Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4411 T--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ =FEnter Search Criteria, Press Esc Key to Transmit - - ==Press Del Key to Terminate Delete Mode - . -- CHANGE Contract Transactions ... - - Contract Number 4411 + - - + +vendor Name ROBINSON & NOBLE INC + +Subject WELL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS - ANDERSON CREEK + =FDepartment ENGINEERING =F ==Status Code PRO A -.- Amount $131000.00 == + Begin Date o 1 / 0 8 /20 0 4 =,= + Insurance End Date 12/31/2004 == + Type Amount Review Date 02/15/2007 == =1= GL $2000000.00 - - -- AL $1000000.00 ;= -- E&O $1000000.00 + + Insurance Total $4000000.00 + + Insurance Review Date 02/01/2005 + + + + Comments PROJECT #R0241102 + + VAULT 01/01/2007 =F + + +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ---.----------.- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ANDERSON CREEK WELLFIELD IMPROVEMENTS Project Number R024 11 02 The City of Bremerton ("City") and Robinson & Noble, Inc. ("Consultant"), referred to collectively as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services: 1. Scope: The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the Scope of Work, including any attachments thereto, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be modified only pursuant to Section VII.H. of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides for unspecified additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express written request of the City. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such services are performed. II. Term: The City and the Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work described in Exhibit A is to be completed as provided for in the work schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B; provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays or extra work as provided for in section IX (A) of this agreement. III. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the City shall pay Consultant in an amount not to exceed $131,000.00. Consultant's charges and bills shall conform to the fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. The Consultant shall submit regular billing statements detailing work performed and amount charged on each task or portion thereof. The descriptions shall conform to and fall within the categories set out in the Scope of Work and/or Fee Schedule. Upon receipt of a conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to prioritize scoped work and accelerate and/or delay work tasks under the time frame set forth in Section II herein. The Consultant's labor rates and billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibit C. Consultant shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shaH only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in accordance with Exhibit C. If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold payment until the statement is brought into compliance. Such withholding does not relieve Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement. BremertonIRobinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Well field Improvements Page I of? ----------- -- -----------~~ IV. Relationship of Parties: Consultant represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its field of expertise. Consultant and its personnel are independent Consultants and not employees of the City. Consultant and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the City's employees and other Consultants. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-Consultants of the Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub-Consultants during the performance of this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent Consultants to perform the same or similar work. As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management. The City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of managerial control over Consultant or its personnel. As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for payment of all taxes and licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State professional licensing, and City business licensing. If any taxes or fees due the City have been declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges arising from the delinquency, from any payments due Consultant. V. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance ofthis Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's sole negligence. The City's review or acceptance of any of the work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent ofthe Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. BremertonlRobinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield hnprovements Page 2 of7 VI. Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-Consultants. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and 2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's liability; and 3. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence/claim. Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant. All required policies shall be provided on an "occurrence" basis except professional liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a "claims-made" basis. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of an endorsement that is acceptable to the City, which names the City as an additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies and endorsements. The City further reserves the right to reject any unacceptable policies and/or endorsements. The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. The City shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage. The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason, proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as evidence of coverage. Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 3 of 7 VII. General Conditions: A. Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Consultant shall furnish periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Consultant shall maintain accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to substantiate all billed amounts. B. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents: Original documents, drawings, designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the property of the City. All written infonnation submitted by the City to the Consultant in connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise. All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored at Consultant's office in Tacoma, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the City upon its request, and at reasonable cost. All documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software or other items prepared or furnished by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments of service with respect to the project and are the property of the City. Any reuse by the City for other than the specific purpose intended will be at City's sole risk. C. Consultant to Maintain Records to Support Independent Consultant Status: On the effective date of this Agreement (or shortly thereafter), Consultant shall: 1. File a schedule of expenses with the Internal Revenue Service for the type of business Consultant conducts; 2. Establish an account with the Washington State Department of Revenue and other necessary state agencies for the payment of all state taxes normally paid by employers, register to receive a unified business identifier number from the State of Washington; and 3. Maintain a separate set of books and records that reflect all items of income and expenses of Consultant's business, all as described in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Section 51.08.195, as required to show that the services performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall not give rise to an employer- employee relationship between the parties which is subject to RCW Title 51, Industrial Insurance. Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 4 of 7 D. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk: Consultant shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub consultants in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. E. Place of Work: The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this Agreement at its offices in Tacoma, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at locations mutually agreed upon by the parties. F. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement. G. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. H. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by both Parties. I. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1st class mail, or by personal service, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. City Address Consultant Address City of Bremerton Robinson & Noble, Inc. City Clerk 5320 Orchard Street West 239 Fourth St. Tacoma, WA 98467 Bremerton, WA 98337 Attention: Mr. Doug Dow J. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power ar/sing out of this Agreement shall not be deemed waiver of any other right or power. K. Non-Waiver of Breach: The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. L. Compliance with Laws: Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement. Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 5 of 7 M. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court. N. Attorneys' Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney's fees. O. Assignment: Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without the written consent of the City shall be void. VIII. Nondiscrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate in employment or services to the public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, or disability, except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification. IX. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated, at will, by either Party upon sixty (60) days notice to the other Party. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a Party if the other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party, and the non-performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within thirty (30) days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Notice by Consultant shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work current through the termination date. If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement. Termination shall be effective ten calendar days after Consultant's receipt of the written notice by certified mail. A. Excusable Delays: The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials, equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2) any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement, the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay. B. Rights Upon Termination: In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 6 of 7 without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. CITY OF M CONSULTANT By: ~: Mayor its: Date: /- ~' O~ Date: Approved as to form: Bremerton City Attorney Bremerton/Robinson & Noble, Inc. Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Page 7 of 7 Exhibit A Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Scope of Work November 13, 2003 Robinson & Noble, Inc. proposes the following scope of work for the City of Bremerton's (City) Anderson Creek Wellfield Improvements Project. As a result of our meeting on October 7tn, we understand the City has the goal of being able to distribute a minimum of 3,000 gallons per minute (gpm) from the ~nderson Creek Wellfield. Presently, the wellfield is able to produce about 2,250 gpm. We have reviewed our files from past work in the wellfield and believe this goal can be attained. Robinson & Noble typically provides general professional services as detailed below for each new, reconstructed, rehabilitated, or abandoned well. Specific requirements will vary for each Task. Administer Project Robinson & Noble will provide for the administrative needs of the project. After the pre-design report is approved, we will prepare well drilling, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and decommissioning technical specifications and bid documents to be included with the City's boiler-plate bid package. Technical specifications will be put together by Robinson & Noble with pertinent sections provided by the City for insert into the document. Robinson & Noble will provide draft documents for 70 and 100-percent review by the City. When requested, we will meet with your representative and provide periodic verbal progress reports. We will also review the selected drilling contractor's invoices for accuracy. Robinson & Noble invoices will include a summary sheet which itemizes the previous billings to date, the current billing, and the total amount billed by task as outlined in this document. Included with each invoice will be a written project status report showing the percent complete for each task. Observe Well Construction, Rehabilitation and Abandonment A qualified hydrogeologist will observe new well construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or abandonment and keep the City informed of the Contractor's progress. Proper design and complete development are the keys to a successful well. Our hydrogeologist will be onsite during all critical phases of construction, completion, and development for each new, reconstructed, or rehabilitated well. We will also observe the critical phases of the well abandonment process. Provide Well Screen Design Our hydrogeologist will collect aquifer samples during new well construction and perform sieve analysis of the samples in our soils laboratory. We will also conduct appropriate geophysical logs, if needed, to help determine screen placement in the aquifer. Our proposed screen design for each new or reconstructed well will be submitted for City approval before completion materials are purchased and installed by the Contractor. Conduct 24-hour Pumping Tests The Department of Health requires all new sources to be tested for a minimum of 24-hours and the test results evaluated by a licensed hydrogeologist. We will install automatic water level sensing devices in the pumping well and observation wells (if available and accessible) prior to conducting 24-hour well tests. We may request some labor assistance from the City to back-up the automatic data with manual measurements at appropriate intervals. At the end of each 24-hour test, we will collect any required water quality samples for transport to a certified laboratory and pay all lab fees. Prepare Reports Robinson & Noble will prepare a technical report for each new well. These reports will include all information and analysis required by Ecology and Health. This will consist of a location map, lithologic and geophysical logs, well completion details, and graphic analysis of the well tests along with all test data, water quality results, and 6-month, 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year wellhead protection area delineations. Wellhead protection area delineations shall be established using the USEPA analytical model GPTP~AC or similar method. Other reports, not required by regulators, will be tailored to fit the needs of the City. This scope of work is divided into six sections that describe the proposed work to be done followed by cost estimates for our professional services. Pre-design Evaluation and Report Task 1. Pre-design Evaluation and Report Once the final scope of work is determined we will visit the wellfield, conduct a pre-design evaluation, select new well sites, and prepare a detailed pre-design report. Professional services estimate: $10,000 New Wells We propose construction of the following new wells categorized as direct replacements or additional points of withdrawal. Replacement Wells Task 2. Well IR Water right claim number 116705 for 800 gpm and 1,000 acre feet per year (af/yr). In 1940, Well 1 was completed at a depth of 261 feet below ground surface (bgs) in the Shallow Artesian Aquifer (SAA). Replacement Well iR should be located approximately 50 feet from Well 1 and drilled to a depth of 300 feet to take advantage of the thickness of the aquifer found in Wells 2R and 3. Although Wells 2R and 3 were tested at rates over 1,000 gpm, they produce significant interference (30 ft plus or minus) between each other and other SAA wells. Consequently, we estimate the sustainable pumping rate from Well iR (with other SAA wells operating) will be between 400 and 600 gpm. Professional services Estimate: $15,000 Task 3. Well 6R Water right claim number 116700 for 600 gpm and 700 af/yr in 1944. Well 6 is completed at 535 feet bgs in the Deep Artesian Aquifer (DAA). It originally produced 320 gpm. Replacement Well 6R should be located approximately 50 feet from Wells 5 and 6 and drilled to a depth between 550 and 600 feet to take advantage of the thickness of the aquifer found in Wells 7 and 8. Wells 5 and 6 originally produced 400 and 320 gpm respectively. With more aquifer thickness and modern completion methods, we estimate the sustainable yield will be between 500 and 600 gpm from Well 6R. Professional services estimate: $20,000 Additional Point of Withdrawal Task 4. Well 3R Water right claim number 116703 for 1,200 gpm and 1,500 af/yr in 1943. Well 3 is completed in the SAA at a depth of 316 feet. It was originally tested at rates up to 1,500 gpm but now produces 350 to 400 gpm with some sand at the higher rate. Since Well 3 is still operational and should be able to provide 200 gpm of free-flow water during the winter and 200 gpm or more sand-free, pumped water during summer peak periods, Well 3R would be categorized as an additional point of withdrawal under the same water right claim. Well 3R is proposed as a SAA well to be drilled to a depth of about 320 feet. It will be completed using modern methods similar to the construction of Well 2R. It should have the same sustainable yield as Well 2R, which is about 800 ~pm. Professional services estimate: $15,000 Reconstruction We believe Wells 7 and N-2 can be reconstructed to provide sand- free water from Well 7 and about 500 gpm of new water from N-2. Task 5. Well 7 Water right certificate number G1-05570C (3728) 450 gpm and 700 af/yr in 1960. Well 7 is completed in the DAA at a depth of 629 feet. It was originally tested at a pumping rate of 1,080 gpm in 1945 and had a free flow of 450 ~pm. It was producing 530 gpm in 1984 and was rated for 500 gpm after reconstruction in 1990. Legally, it should not be pumped at rates over 450 gpm without being designated as an additional point of withdrawal under another water right claim or certificate. The well has a sanding problem on startup and must be discharged to waste for several hours before the sand content diminishes to an acceptable level. Robinson & Noble recommends installation of an 8-inch well screen inside the 16-inch perforated casing and filling the annulus with correctly sized filter sand. This reconstruction would allow use of sand-free water on startup. After reconstruction, we expect Well 7 will be capable of producing 450 gpm of sand-free water with a few more feet of drawdown. Professional services estimate: $8,000 Task 6. Well 4R (Well N-2) Well N-2 was originally drilled into the DAA as Well 9R but did not produce an adequate quantity of water (50 gpm) and was not put into service. The original Well 9 (N-l) was completed in the SAA between depths of 282 and 330 feet bgs but produced less than 300 gpm of questionable quality water. An unsuccessful attempt was made to salvage the well screen and drill deeper. Some of the tools used to attempt salvage of the screen were lost in the well and were not recovered. The drilling contractor moved over and drilled a new well (N-2) to a depth of 876 feet bgs in 1986. Neither well was ever used and the Well 9 designation was transferred to a well constructed outside of the Anderson Creek Wellfield. A review of our files indicated there were numerous problems during the completion phase of the Well 9R (N-2) project. The well as constructed is completed with a 10-inch pipe size screen welded to the bottom of 10-inch well casing at 876 feet extending up into the 16-inch well casing to a depth of 477 feet. Figure 2 in our 2001, In-Depth Analysis of Anderson Creek Wellfield, report to the City erroneously showed the 10-inch well casing extending to the surface. Our file offered a completion design for the SAA that was not approved by the City in 1986. We recommend that design, calling for abandonment of the lower portion of the well and installation of a well screen between 210 and 260 feet bgs, be completed under this project. Our hydrogeologist's field notes indicate a very permeable section of gravel and sand in the SAA that was not logged or recognized in the original Well 9 (N-i) drilled by the City's own drilling contractor. We estimate the sustainable yield from this new source will be at least 500 gpm. We propose calling this Well 4R. It would be designated as the replacement for Well 4 under the 1944 water right claim number 116702 for 500 gpm and 650 af/yr. Professional services estimate: $10,000 Rehabilitation Wells that have lost yield over time can usually be redeveloped to increase their efficiency to allow pumping rates close to their original well yields. Robinson & Noble's hydrogeologist will observe the cable-tool drill redevelop these wells using surge and bail techniques. The hydrogeologist will consult with the City if more exotic and costly redevelopment using chemicals or high-pressure jetting is required. The hydrogeologist will determine when development is complete and will conduct short pumping tests to determine well efficiency (specific capacity) for comparison with previous test data. Task 7. Well 2R Water right claim number 116704 for 1,200 gpm and 1,500 af/yr in 1941. Well 2R was drilled into the SAA and completed with a modern, filter-sand completion design at a depth of 275 feet bgs in 1989. Originally tested by our hydrogeologist at rates up to 1,000 gpm and rated for 800 gpm, Well 2R is now reported to produce between 600 and 800 gpm and free flow between 100 and 400 gpm during the non-pumping winter months. Although Well 2R currently produces nearly 800 gpm, its loss of efficiency has caused a deeper pumping water level to reach that level of production. Redevelopment will increase well efficiency and reduce the drawdown at the same pumping rate. This is important because it will minimize the interference impacts from the other SAA wells and reduce production costs. Discussion with the City's well operations supervisor indicated that the original Well 2 still is capable of free-flowing several hundred gpm during the winter months. We recommend that this flow be encouraged and used by the City when possible. Well 2R should be designated as an additional point of withdrawal under the Well 2 water right claim. Professional services estimate: $5,000 Task 8. Well 8 Water right certificate G1-22932C for 600 9pm and 960 af/yr in 1977 supplemental to the City's existing water rights (Report of Examination for Well 8). This supplemental water right does not add to the City's water rights including claims. As a supplemental source it can be used up to the certificated amounts when other City sources cannot meet their claimed or certificated withdrawal amounts. It can not be used to expand the City's rights. Well 8 was completed in 1978 at a depth of 578 feet in the DAA. It was originally tested at a pumping rate of 750 gpm with a free flow of 160 ~pm. Currently producing 500 gpm it should be rehabilitated to increase well efficiency. Since it has the capability of producing more that it's authorized amount of 600 gpm, the City could try to designate any additional production from Well 8 as from an additional point of withdrawal under the 1944 Well 5 water right claim 116701 for 800 ~pm and 1,000 af/yr. Professional services estimate: $5,000 Abandonment Wells should be decommissioned (abandoned) when they are no longer useful as producing sources or aquifer monitoring points. They should also be abandoned if they interconnect different aquifers or are potential conduits for contaminants. The following wells are proposed for abandonment if budgets allow. However, if these sources can produce sufficient free flowing water of good quality, they should be used whenever possible. Task 9. Well 1 Wells 1 and 4 are completed in the SAA and, pending evaluation as free-flowing sources, are not needed for aquifer monitoring. They should be abandoned according to WAC 173-160-381 which calls for perforation of the well casing to within five feet of the surface and pressure grouting with cement. Care must be taken to ensure a seal is made to an aquitard outside of the well casing. Uncontrolled flow around the outside of the casing may not be correctable. Professional services estimate: $3,000 Task 10. Well 4 Professional services estimate: $4,000 Task 11. Well 6 Well 6 is completed at a depth of 535 feet in the DAA. However, it may also be open to the SAA. Interconnection of aquifers is not allowed under current law. However, Well 6 is located on the east side of Anderson Creek and new access may have to be constructed before it can be abandoned. It should also be evaluated as a potential source of free-flowing water during the winter months. Professional services estimate: $4,000 Other Services Robinson & Noble will perform other professional services as directed and authorized by the City. Some of those potential services were discussed at the meeting and may include the following. Task 12. Well£ield Evaluation Report We were asked to include an updated wellfield evaluation report at the end of the project. This report would be in addition to the individual well reports for work under this project and may include: · Brief history of each well. · Table of well completion details. · Graphic as-built for each well. · Individual well pumping rates. · Wellfield operation recommendations. · Recommendations for additional work. · Water rights table. · Copies of Form RCW 90.44.100(3) for all replacement wells and additional points of withdrawal. · Well free-flow evaluation with recommendations. · Other recommendations. Professional services estimate: $6,000 Task 13. Well Testing City wells not specifically designated as part of this project may need to be tested as part of the wellfield evaluation. Robinson & Noble hydrogeologist's would provide level monitoring equipment, conduct testing, and prepare reports as requested by the City. Part of the wellfield evaluation should be determining the combined production rate for wellfield. This will include pumping as many wells as possible at the same time to determine the wellfield's maximum sustainable yield. However, this test may be limited by the capability of the City's pump station. Professional services estimate: $8,000 14. Coordination with Regulators Robinson & Noble will provide professional support to the City as requested for answering questions by; preparation of documents, exhibits, reports for; and attendance at meetings with State and County regulators, for example the Departments of Ecology and Health. Professional services estimate: $6,000 15. Other Authorized Services (Contingency) Robinson & Noble will provide other professional services as authorized in writing by the City. Professional services estimate: $12,000 (10% of total services) Project Estimate Number Professional Services 1 $10,000 2 $15,000 3 $20,000 4 $15,000 5 $ 8,000 6 $10,000 7 $ 5,000 8 $ 5,O00 9 $ 3,0OO 10 $ 4,000 11 $ 4,000 12 $ 6,000 13 $ 8,000 14 $ 6,000 15 $12,000 Estimate $131,000 Service Agreement Robinson & Noble works on a time-and-expense basis according to the attached General Fee Schedule, Exhibit B. We estimate the total cost of our services for the scope of work described above to be $131,000 based on our understanding of the project and the conditions outlined in this scope. Project costs will be tracked closely, and any foreseeable changes affecting cost will be discussed with the City at the earliest opportunity. We have reviewed the City's modified Professional Services Agreement (PSA) and find it acceptable. If the City accepts this proposal after reviewing it, please forward to us your PSA for our signature. Upon our receipt and acceptance of the signed agreement, we will commence work on the project. EXHIBIT C - COST ESTIMATE City of BremeHon Pre-Desig[~ Report Preliminary Robinson & Noble Cost Estimate October 27, 2003 task Task Description HGEO I.A Project management 1 4 $760 1.B Project coordination 2 $200 1 .C $0 task Tot= $960 2.A Review well completion reports 2 $200 2.B Review production data 2 $200 2.C Discuss operational history 2 $200 2,D $0 2,E $0 rask Tot= $600 3.A Visit each well site 8 $100 $900 3.B Discuss access to well sites $100 3.C Discuss City responsibilities $100 3.D $0 task Tot= $1,100 4.A Discuss test procedure 2 $200 4.B Set up flow measurement 2 2 $360 4.C Conduct test 8 $640 4.D Evaluate test results 2 2 2 $560 task Tot= $1~760 5.A Review test data 2 $20 $220 5.B Discuss known well problems $100 5.C Determine well specific capacity 8 $740 Task Tot= $1~060 3.0 Determine scope of work · · :':: :':': :'::: :'::: ::: ::::::: 6.A Discuss existing problems 2 $200 6.B Determine City needs 2 $200 6.C Meet at City 2 $200 Task Tot= $600 7.A .~oordinate with City $100 7.B Vleet with City and Health at site $300 7.C ~.nswer quesfions $100 7.D 7.E $0 fask Tot= $500 8.A ;)raft report 16 8 3 2 $2,570 8.B =inal report 2 2 2 2 $760 8.C ~nswer questions $100 i'ask Tot= $3,430 TOTAL HOURS 3 61 0 30 7 9 RATE PER HOUR $120 $106 $90 $80 $70 $60 TOTAL COST $360 $6,100 $0 $2r400 $490 $540 $120 $10~010 Cost Estimate = $10,010 10% Contigency = $1,001 TOTAL ESTIMATE = $11,011 EXHIBIT C - COST ESTIMATE City of Bremedon Well 1R Preliminary Robinson & Noble Cost Estimate October 27, 2003 Fask Task Description HGEO HGEO HGEO HGEO DRAFT ADMIN ~,O STS COST 1.0 Administer Project ::;::::::::::;:::::: ::::::::;::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: :,:::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: :;::::::::::::::::: 1.A Project management 2 $1,080 1.B Reviewofbackground maledals $100 1.C Project coordination $200 I.D Review contractors invoices 0.~ $50 I.E Coordinate meetings (Assume 2) $50 450 Task Tot= $1 ~880 -).0 Prepare Technical Specifications :.:::::::::::::::: ::: ::: :::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::'::::::: ::::::: :: ::: : :::.: .: :.: :: 2.A Prepare ddlling plan 0.5 $130 2. B Prepare proposed well design 0.." $120 2. C Prepare technical specifications 0.5 2 $580 2.D Answer Contractors questions $100 2.E Assist City with bid process $100 ]'ask Tot= $1,030 3.0 Observe Ddlling ;:'::::;:::::::::: :.::::::::.:.:.: ::::;:.;:.:.::: :.:::::;:::::::::::;::::::::::;:::::: ::'::::':':':::: ;:::::::::::: 3.A Observe drilling 48 $100 $3,600 3.B Compare hydrogeology 0,.~ $50 3.C Verbalprogress reports $100 3.D Determine completion depth 0.5i $58 Task Tot= $31800 L0 Provide Well Screen Design :::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::: ::::::: :::::::::::::: ::::: :::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: :::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: 4.A Collect aquifer samples $166 4.B Conduct sieve analysis $32£ 4.C Conduct geophysical logging $32£ 4.D Prepare well screen design 1 $32£ Task Tot-- $1 ~ 120 ~.0 Observe Completion :::::;::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::; :: ::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: 5.A Observe completion $20 $66C 5.B Check dimensions with design $8C 5.C Confirm placement depths $8£ Task Tot= $820 3.0 Observe Development ::'::::::: :::::':: :::::'::: :::.: ::: ::: :::::::.:::::. :-:.:.::i:i:i:: :i: ~::i: :i:i: :i: :i:iI !:::!: :: :::::!::: ::: ::: :::::::::::: 6.A Determine development method 1 $1 6.B Observe development progress 1( $30 $1,31( 6.C Determine when complete 1 $10( Task Tot= $11810 ~.0 Conduct Pumpn~ Test :::::::::: ::::::::i::: :::::::::: ::::::::::::::; :::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: 7.A Coordinate testing with City 0,5 $5( 7.8 Determine test pump size 0.5 $5( 7.C Provide and install data loggers $100 $74( 7.D Make manualmeasurements 12 $28 $98( 7.E Collect water quality samples $1,00C $1,08£ Task Tot= $21900 3.0 Report of §ndin,qs :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::;::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: :;::::::: ::::::::: 8.A Draft report 4 8 3 2 $1,37( 8.B Final report 1 1 2 2 $50( 8. C Answer questions 1 $10( Task Tot= $1,970 TOTAL HOURS 3.5 36 0 108 6 10.5 RATE PER HOUR $120 $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 TOTAL COST $420 $3~600 $0 $8,640 $420 $630 $1f320 $15f030 I Cost Estimate = $15,030 10% Contigency = $1,503 TOTAL ESTIMATE = $18,533 EXHIBIT C - COST ESTIMATE City of Brenr~rton Well 6R Preliminary Robinson & Noble Cost Estimate October 27, 2003 Task l'ask Description HGEO HGEO HGEO HGEO DRAFT ADMIN COSTS COST 1 .A Project management 2 $1,080 1.B Review of background materials $200 1.C Project coordination $400 1.D Review contractors invoices $100 1.E 3.oordinate meetings (Assume 2) $5( 450 Task Tot= $2~230 2.A Prepare drilling plan $260 2.B Prepare proposed well design 1 $170 2.0 Prepare technical specifications 1 ~ $640 2. D Answer Contractors questions $200 2,E Assist City with bid process $200 Task Tot= $1 ~470 3 .A Dbserve ddlling 60 $100 $5,200 3.B Sompare hydrogeology $100 3.C Verbal progress reports 2 $260 3.D Deterr~ine completion depth $100 Task Tot= $5~660 4.A Collect aquifer samples 2 $160 4.B Conduct sieve analysis 6 $480 4.C Conduct geophysical logging 4 $320 4.D Prepare well screen design 1 2 2 $400 Task Tot= $11360 5.A Observe comple6on 16 $20 $1,300 5.B Check dimensions with design 1 $80 5.C Confirm placement depths I $80 ~aask Tot= $1 r460 6.0 Observe Development ':':': :':: :'::': ::':::::~::~:: :: :': ?:': :':: :': :':':': ::': :' :::::::::: : ::: :':':' ':'" ' 6.A Determine development method 1 $100 6.B Observe development progress 24 $30 $1,95C 6.C Determine when complete 1 $100 Task Tot= $2~150 7.A Coordinate testing with City 0.5 $5( 7.B Determine test pump size 0.5 $5( 7.C Provide and install data loggers 8 $100 $74£ 7.D Make manual measurements 16 $20 $1,30( 7. E Collect water quality samples 2 $1,000 $1,16( Task Tot= $3~300 8.A Draft report 6 8 2 $1,57( 8.B Final report 1 11 2 $69( 8.C Answer questions I Task Tot= $2r360 TOTAL HOURS RATE PER HOUR $120 $100 $90 $50 $70 $60 TOTAL COST $600l $4~600 $0 $12~320 $490 $660 $1r320 $19,990 Cost Estimate = $19,990 10% Con6gency = $1,999 TOTAL ESTIMATE = $21,989 EXHIBIT C - COST ESTIMATE City of Sremerlon Well 3R Preliminary Robinson & Noble Cost Estimate October 27, 2003 Sub PRIN ~SSOC SENIOR PROJECT ~llSC IITAS=< Task task Descdpflon HGEO '~GEO HGEO HGEO DRAFT ~DMIN 3OSTSIICOST 1.A 3roject management 2: 6 4 $1,08£ 1.B ~eview of background materials I St 1.C =roject coordination 2 $20( 1.D ~eview contractors invoices 0.5 $5( I.E 3oordinate meetings (Assume 2) 4 $50 45( Task Tot= $1 ~880 2.A ~repareddlling plan 1 0.5 $13( 2.B 3repare proposed well design 0.5 1 $12( 2.C 3repare technical specifications 0.5 4 2 $58( 2.D ~nswer Contractors ques6ons 1 $10( 2.E ~ssist City with bid process 1 $10( Task Tot= $1,030 3.A 3bserve drilling 3 4C $100 $3,60( 3. B 3ompare hydrogeology 0.5 $5( 3. C ~/erbalprogress reports 1 $10( 3. D 3etermine completion depth 0,5 $5( Task Tot= $6~800 4.A 3ollect aquifer samples $160 4.B .~onduct sieve analysis $320 4.C 3onduct geophysical logging $320 4.D =repare well screen design 2 $320 Task Tot= $1 ~120 5.A Dbserve completion $2C $660 5.B 3heck dimensions with design $80 5.C .~on6rm placement depths $80 Task Tot= $820 6,A :)etermine development method $100 6.B :)bserve development progress 16 $3C $1,310 6.C 3etermine when complete $100 Task Tot= $1 ~510 7.A 3cordinate testing with City 0.5 $50 7.B 3etermine test pump size 0.5 $50 7.C 3rovide and install data loggers 8 $10C $740 7,D ~lake manual measurements 12 $2C $980 7.E ;ollect water quality samples 1 $1,00C $1,080 Task Tot= $2T900 8.0 Report of findings · "" "'' "'" 8.A Draft report 8 3 2 $1,370 8,B Final report 1 2 2 $500 8.C Answer questions $100 ITask Tot= $1,970 TOTAL HOURS 3.5 3E 108 6 10.5 RATE PER HOUR $120 $10~ $9( $80 $70 $60 TOTAL COST $420 $3~60¢ $( $8,640 $420 $630 $I~320 $15~030 Cost Estimate = $15,030 10% Contigency = $1,503 TOTAL ESTIMATE = $16,533 ~ ~ ,.,::::: - : ~-:::: ~0 iii :i::: ,~-~c° ::::: ~ ::: ~ · ~ 0 0 ::::: :.:.: ~oo ~~ o~ o=~ ~ ~ ~ ,, ,, · - ~ ~ c = 0 o 0 > 0 ::::: I- :.: ~ · .:.: I- ~ n,, ..:. ~- ~ w :::: i:i:E :.:: o ~ '~:': !'!:! ::::: -- ~.~ <"'~< ~, ~' '~ 'oo>® .~ ,~_= E ~.¢1~' = 0~0 o 0 ~i__. ~ ~mqq <mo <mo ~>"'~ ~ ~ o .... oNc4c4 ocdcdcd I- ::::: ~ :.: ~ i:ii ~' ::::: ~ ill ----- ~ :i:i :.:: k.- iiii :'::: ~ ~0 o O ".':': i:i:i '::' ~ ~ (.9:::: ... ~ ::::: :6 ..: m 0 0 ::::: i::i: "' '" m © © ~ ~ - :::: er ~ :.:::: :!:i: ==~.z'"° .~ ~ ,.,, E ,,, ,,, ~'~ ~ r~ ,~ ",=m ,~ On'O -- -E~ ~,~= o o- TI.UO .-- ='- ~.8~:'- <,,,< < O%, -~ ~.-, O ~om mSmc 0 o 0 ~ ::i:i ::. i:i:i: :':' i:i: ~ ~ ~ ~ . ..: ~ ii!iii :::::: :.: ~o * ~ ~ ::. ~~ m !ii!!i :'!:!: .:.:. o ~ ~ :i:i:i ' :: x ~ m ::::: :::i: ~ ~ iiiii ":' :': _ z ~ :i:i :.::: ~ ~ :::: ':' 0 ~z ~.-~0 ~ ~'~ .9~ ~ ~ ~ · =o ~ ~:~i0~0 E '- ~w o ~.~ ~ o ~i~ ~m~ ~ <mo Exhibit C General Fee Schedule October 1, 2003 Professional Typical Fee Position Duties Per Hour Principal Hydrogeologist/ Service requiring the scientific expertise of Environmental Scientist company principals. Includes top-level project $80 - $120 review and control, client liaison, and hydrogeo[ogic analysis. Associate Hydrogeologist/ Associate-level project management, client Environmental Scientist liaison, field services, project analysis, and $80 - $100 repod writing. Senior Hydrogeologis'd Senior-level project management, client liaison, Environmental Scientist field services, data interpretation and analysis, $70 - $90 and report writing. Project Geologist/ Field services; data collection, reduction, $70 - $80 Hydrogeologist/ interpretation and analysis; and report writing. Environmental Scientist Draftsperson/Technician Technical illustration/CADD, production layout, $60 - $70 technical aide. Service Typical Fee Category Duties Per Hour Legal supportJtestimony Expert witness services. 125% of above rates Administrative Services Contracts, technical specifications, $60 administrative tasks., grammatical editiing Typist/Clerical Support Word processing, report preparation, general $40 - $60 office tasks. Subcontracts Professional Services Negotiated Outside Lab Services 12% Construction Subcontracts 12% Other Costs Travel (Auto) $0.35/mile Travel (Other) Cost + 5% Direct Other Expenses Cost + 5% Equipment Rental See following page This fee schedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions. Hydrogeologic Equipment Rental Schedule January 1, 2003 Equipment Unit Rate Water level transducer First five days $25 and data logger Each day thereafter $25 Electric water level sounder(s) Flat fee per project $25 Gamma Ray Probe Per day $25 Electrical Resistivity Logger Per day $35 2-inch Centrifugal Pump Per day $35 Submersible pump Per day $100 Generator Per day $60 Other Equipment Negotiated Negotiated This fee schedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions. Environmental Equipment Rental Schedule January 1,2003 Equipment Unit Rate Water level transducer and data logger Per day $50 Electric water level sounder Per day $25 Purge Pump Per day $25 Purge/Sampling tubing Each 10 feet $2.50 Peristaltic Pump Per day $40 Peristaltic tubing Each 10 feet $5 2-inch Centrifugal Pump Per day $75 Submersible pump Per day $100 Generator Per day $60 Photoionization Detector Per day $100 Combustible Gas Indicator Per day $50 Water Quality Meters (pH, DO, Per meter per day $40 Turbidity, Conductivity) Water sample bailer Each $10 Bailer Rope/String Each 10 feet $2.50 Soil Sampling Equipment (hand) Per day $30 Soil Sampling Equipment (power) Per day $40 Personal Protection Equipment Per day per person $50 Other Equipment Negotiated Negotiated This fee schedule is subject to change according to contract or Professional Services Agreement conditions.