Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/09/2026 STUDY SESSION AGENDA PACKET CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDA – AMENDED SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 5:00 PM 345 6th Street, Suite 100, Bremerton, WA 98337 - Phone (360) 473-5280 Council Conference Room 603 will be open to the public to attend the Study Session in-person, but there will be no opportunities for input. However, public questions or comments may be submitted at any time to City.Council@bremertonwa.gov. Please remember that the content of the Agenda Bill items is subject to change; and no action at the Study Session is anticipated. Please visit https://www.bremertonwa.gov/691/Council-Meetings to review the Agenda & Study Session Packet; and for instructions on how to join the meeting via Zoom. A. AGENDA BILL BRIEFINGS 1. Authorize Creation of Probation and Treatment Court Administrator and Reallocation of Funding 2. Resolution giving 8th Street between Warren Ave and Pacific Avenue an honorary designation of Bishop L. Robertson Way Item added B. GENERAL COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Briefing (Last Meeting 9/9/26) – Chair Jane Rebelowski 2. Regional and Other Committee/Board Briefings  Kitsap Transit Board of Commissioners Briefing (Last Meeting 9/1/26) – Jane Rebelowski  Kitsap 911 Board of Commissioners Briefing (Last Meeting 9/1/26) – Jane Rebelowski and Jennifer Chamberlin 3. Other General Council Business (Only as necessary, and as time allows) C. INFORMATION ONLY PRESENTATION 1. Proposed Public Hearing on Zoning Code Amendments to Bremerton Municipal Code Section 20.46.090 and Temporary Encampment Permit D. ADJOURNMENT OF STUDY SESSION AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Study Session Date: September 9, 2026 Authorize Creation of Probation and Treatment Court Administrator and Reallocation of Funding COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 16, 2026 Department: Municipal Court Presenter: Judge Tom Weaver Phone: (360) 473-5254 SUMMARY: Bremerton Municipal Court is actively revitalizing and expanding its Community Treatment Court program. The court will receive $81,700 in state funding through the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) to support the program this fiscal year. Of this funding, $66,454 may be applied toward a new full-time equivalent (FTE) position. Due to the Court’s significant probation caseload and the additional responsibilities associated with expanding Treatment Court, we are requesting approval to establish a Grade 18 Probation and Treatment Court Administrator position. This position would provide administrative leadership and oversight for both Treatment Court and Probation operations. ATTACHMENTS: Job description, Salary Schedule (Added 9/9/26 9:00 AM), HR comparables, Power Point, Letter of Support FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Requesting Grade 18 position, which maxes at $116,928. After factoring in state funding of $66,454, fiscal impact would be $50,474 this fiscal year with potential for increased state funding in the future. STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to create the position of Probation and Treatment Court Administrator at Grade 18; and authorize reallocation of funding. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 04/19/2024 A1 City of Bremerton Classification Specification August 2026 PROBATION AND TREATMENT COURT ADMINISTRATOR Page 1 of 4 GENERAL FUNCTION The Probation and Treatment Court Administrator is responsible for the overall administration and day-to-day operations of the Probation Department and Treatment Court Program. This position reports directly to the Municipal Court Judge and supervises assigned probation and treatment court personnel. The Administrator develops and implements policies, procedures, and operational standards; administers an annual operating budget currently totaling approximately $544,810; oversees grants and contracts within delegated authority; evaluates program performance; and ensures services are delivered effectively and in compliance with applicable laws, court rules, evidence-based practices, City policies, and contractual requirements. The Administrator currently supervises one probation employee, with future planning to increase staff, and is responsible for assessing staffing needs and supporting planned departmental growth. The Administrator advises the Municipal Court Judge on operational and strategic matters, provides guidance on complex cases, and may carry a limited caseload or perform advanced probation and treatment court duties as needed. REPRESENTATIVE ESSENTIAL DUTIES and RESPONSIBILITIES (Note: This list is intended to illustrate the various types of work that may be performed. The omission of specific statements does not exclude them from the position.)  Plan, organize, direct, and evaluate the day-to-day operations of the Probation Department and Treatment Court Program to achieve established goals within authorized staffing and budget resources.  Supervise assigned Probation and Treatment Court staff, including assigning and reviewing work, scheduling, training, coaching, and supporting professional development.  Establish work rules and performance standards; conduct performance evaluations; address performance concerns; and recommend corrective or disciplinary action consistent with City policies and applicable labor agreements.  Assess staffing needs and recommend organizational and staffing changes. Participate in recruitment, selection, onboarding, and workforce planning.  Develop, implement, and update departmental policies, procedures, and operational standards to ensure compliance with applicable laws, court rules, evidence-based practices, City policies, and contractual requirements.  Advise and confer with the Municipal Court Judge regarding program priorities, policies, budget allocations, staffing levels, operational needs, program performance, and strategic initiatives.  Develop and administer the annual operating budget, currently totaling approximately $130,000. Monitor expenditures, authorize purchases within delegated authority, ensure fiscal accountability, and recommend budget adjustments as needed.  Develop funding proposals; administer grant-funded activities; monitor grant compliance, expenditures, and deliverables; prepare required reports; and ensure adherence to funding requirements.  Develop, negotiate, administer, and monitor contracts and service agreements within delegated authority and in accordance with City purchasing, contracting, and legal-review requirements. City of Bremerton Classification Specification August 2026 PROBATION AND TREATMENT COURT ADMINISTRATOR Page 2 of 4  Ensure complete, accurate, confidential, and timely case records are maintained for the Probation Department and Treatment Court Program. Maintain required records for any personally assigned limited caseload.  Oversee Probation and Treatment Court service delivery, provide guidance on complex cases, and perform advanced probation or treatment court duties when necessary to maintain operations.  Evaluate program effectiveness through performance measures, statistical analysis, participant outcomes, compliance data, and required reporting; recommend and implement operational improvements based on results.  Coordinate with treatment providers, prosecutors, defense counsel, law enforcement, community agencies, and other partners to support effective service delivery and participant outcomes.  Attend and testify at court proceedings related to Treatment Court participation, compliance, violations, progress, and case recommendations. Other Duties  Regular attendance is an essential requirement.  Perform related duties and special projects as assigned and/or required. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS and ABILITIES Knowledge of:  Washington State court rules, policies, procedures, and civil and criminal law procedures applicable to municipal probation and treatment court operations.  Treatment court principles, evidence-based supervision and behavioral-change practices, participant monitoring, and community-based treatment resources.  Principles and practices of employee supervision, performance management, training, coaching, organizational development, and labor-management relations.  Public-sector budgeting, purchasing, grant administration, contract administration, fiscal controls, and records management.  Program planning, performance measurement, statistical analysis, outcome reporting, continuous improvement, confidentiality, and information security.  Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, the Washington State Judicial Information System (JIS), Judicial Access Browser System (JABS), Tyler Supervision, O-Court, and other court or case-management systems. Ability to:  Lead, supervise, evaluate, train, and develop employees while applying City policies and applicable labor agreements consistently.  Plan and manage department operations, establish priorities, allocate resources, and maintain service continuity with limited staffing.  Develop and administer budgets, grants, contracts, purchasing activities, policies, procedures, and operational controls.  Analyze program, financial, compliance, and outcome data; identify trends; and present practical recommendations to the Municipal Court Judge and other stakeholders.  Interpret and apply laws, court rules, confidentiality requirements, City policies, labor agreements, contracts, and grant requirements. City of Bremerton Classification Specification August 2026 PROBATION AND TREATMENT COURT ADMINISTRATOR Page 3 of 4  Communicate clearly, professionally, and with appropriate discretion, both verbally and in writing, with court participants, employees, City staff, legal professionals, treatment providers, partner agencies, and members of the public.  Prepare clear, accurate, and detailed reports, case notes, policies, budget documents, grant reports, contract materials, and other court-related documentation.  Exercise sound judgment, resolve complex operational and personnel issues, manage competing priorities, and respond effectively to sensitive or crisis situations.  Learn and effectively use new software, case-management systems, and other technology required for the position. QUALIFYING EDUCATION and EXPERIENCE (Minimum Requirements)  An equivalent combination of education and experience that provides the required knowledge, skills, and abilities may be considered.  Bachelor’s degree in Criminal Justice, Psychology, Social Work, Behavioral Health or Human Services, Public Administration, Business Administration, or a closely related field.  Four (4) years of progressively responsible experience in probation, treatment court, court administration, criminal justice, behavioral health, social work, or a related program.  At least two (2) years of supervisory, lead, or program-administration experience that includes responsibility for staff, operational planning, or program performance.  Experience administering a budget and developing or implementing operational policies and procedures. Preferred Requirements:  Master’s degree in Criminal Justice, Public Administration, Social Work, Behavioral Health, or a closely related field.  Experience in a municipal court, probation department, treatment court, or comparable public-sector program.  Experience administering grants, contracts, public purchasing, or externally funded programs.  Experience implementing evidence-based practices and using program data to evaluate outcomes and improve services.  Experience using JIS, JABS, Tyler Supervision, O-Court, or comparable court and case-management systems. PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS The position requires the ability to sit for extended periods; routinely stand and walk; frequently use hands and fingers to handle documents, equipment, tools, and controls; and reach with the hands and arms. The position also requires the ability to communicate effectively through speaking and hearing; occasionally lift or move objects weighing up to 20 pounds; and maintain close visual acuity and the ability to adjust focus for computer work, reading, reviewing documents, and other detailed tasks. WORKING CONDITIONS The position requires travel throughout Bremerton and the greater Kitsap County area and may involve extended or irregular hours to meet operational needs and accommodate participant appointments. Duties may include meeting with participants in correctional facilities, offices, and other community-based locations. City of Bremerton Classification Specification August 2026 PROBATION AND TREATMENT COURT ADMINISTRATOR Page 4 of 4 The position may occasionally involve exposure to bodily fluids or other potential biohazards when providing operational coverage or working in areas where urine or saliva samples are collected or handled. The position may also involve interactions with individuals experiencing emotional distress, behavioral health concerns, substance use issues, or other crisis situations. Employees must exercise sound judgment, maintain professional boundaries, follow established safety and infection-control procedures, and use appropriate de-escalation techniques when necessary. LEGAL and REGULATORY EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS  This position is classified as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and is not eligible for overtime.  This position is represented by Teamsters Local 589 in accordance with the applicable labor agreement.  This position is excluded from the City’s Civil Service system. This job description does not constitute an employment contract and may be modified as organizational needs change. TL589 G18-G19 Hourly minimum $53.00 $46.24 Recommended hourly midpoint $60.50 Current direct reports 1 Hourly maximum $68.00 $57.34 Recommended annual midpoint $125,840 Planned additional position 1 Annual minimum $110,240 $96,549 Current hourly midpoint $52 Approximate operating budget $130,000 Annual maximum $141,440 $119,726 Midpoint increase 16.5%Reports to 1 2 3 4 5 6 Core peer group Primary measure Sensitivity Longview Large-scope roles Implementation Peer Hourly Min Hourly Max Lynnwood ACA $59.95 $77.18 Edmonds ACA $54.89 $73.56 Kitsap TC Manager $50.97 $65.20 Kittitas Chief PO $51.15 $62.32 Snohomish Programs Mgr $48.16 $61.46 Market Recommended $53.00 $68.00 Teamsters 589 Recommended G18 - G19 $46.24 $57.34 Place the classification in the existing bargaining-unit grade closest to the recommended range while checking internal equity. CORE PEER HOURLY RANGES RECOMMENDED RANGE METHOD AND GUARDRAILS Two comparable-city assistant court administrators plus Kitsap Treatment Court Manager, Kittitas Chief Probation Officer and Snohomish Probation & Community Programs Manager. Equal-weighted core peer mean of $53.02–$67.95 per hour, rounded to $53.00–$68.00. Core median is $51.15–$65.20; direct comparable-city blend is $51.59–$67.01. Excluded because municipal-court services are contracted to Cowlitz County District Court. Approximately $130,000 operating-budget responsibility Policy, grant and contract administration Program performance measurement and operational improvement Direct accountability to the Municipal Court Judge Limited rather than primary participant caseload CONCLUSION Recommended salary range: Based on market salary data, $53.00–$68.00 per hour ($110,240–$141,440 annually), with a target midpoint of $60.50 per hour ($125,840 annually). This is the rounded mean of the five-position core management peer group. The updated job description is materially above a probation supervisor or senior officer because it carries formal supervision, fiscal, policy, grant, contract and program-performance accountability. The small current staff and approximately $130,000 budget keep it below full court administrators, large-county directors and large-unit managers. Taking into account the scale of Teamsters L589 positions and internal equity, the closest range to this recommendation is between Grade 18 and Grade 19. WHY THE RANGE CHANGED Formal staff supervision, evaluations and disciplinary recommendations King County director/manager and Tacoma unit-manager ranges are secondary references, not primary pricing inputs. Probation and Treatment Court Administrator — 2026 Salary Analysis City of Bremerton | Updated for formal Administrator-level responsibilities | Analysis date: July 29, 2026 MARKET POSITION CURRENT SCOPE Municipal Court Judge $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 $90.00 Lynnwood ACA Edmonds ACA Kitsap TC Manager Kittitas Chief PO Snohomish Programs Mgr Market Recommended Core Peer Hourly Ranges Hourly Min Hourly Max Employer Position Hourly Min Hourly Max Why Included City of Lynnwood Assistant Court Administrator $59.95 $77.18 Comparable city; formal supervision, policies and fiscal/court operations. Broader scope provides an City of Edmonds Assistant Court Administrator $54.89 $73.56 Comparable city; strong match for supervision, fiscal oversight, policy and performance accountability. Kitsap County District Court Treatment Court Manager $50.97 $65.20 Closest treatment-court management benchmark. Kittitas County District Court Chief Probation Officer $51.15 $62.32 Closest probation leadership benchmark. Snohomish County District Court Probation and Community Programs Manager $48.16 $61.46 Strong dual-program management benchmark, adjusted by peer mix for larger county scale. Core peer mean $53.02 $67.95 Primary market measure Core peer median $51.15 $65.20 Sensitivity / reasonableness check Market Cut Hourly Min Hourly Max Midpoint Annual Midpoint Interpretation Comparable-city direct blend $51.59 $67.01 $59.30 $123,341 Lynnwood and Edmonds administrator plus lower-anchor probation roles; Longview excluded. Core management peer mean $53.02 $67.95 $60.48 $125,808 Best overall measure for the updated Administrator scope. Core management peer median $51.15 $65.20 $58.18 $121,004 Conservative sensitivity check. All supplied external positions $53.36 $68.33 $60.84 $126,556 Broad reference only; includes director, large-county and low- outlier roles. Range Hourly Min Hourly Max Hourly Midpoint Annual Min Annual Max Annual Midpoint Midpoint Change vs Current Current Bremerton Grade 18 $47.67 $56.22 $51.94 $99,159 $116,928 $108,044 0.0% Prior recommendation (earlier job scope) $49.00 $62.00 $55.50 $101,920 $128,960 $115,440 6.8% Updated recommendation $53.00 $68.00 $60.50 $110,240 $141,440 $125,840 16.5% Decision rationale: The updated position is a true program administrator, not a senior practitioner. It owns formal supervision, a roughly $130,000 budget, policies, grants, contracts, performance measurement and strategic advice to the Municipal Court Judge. The recommended range is therefore rounded from the core management peer mean. The small current staff (one employee) and modest budget support excluding King County director and Tacoma unit-manager ranges from the primary calculation. Market Synthesis and Range Determination The recommended range is based on an equal-weighted core peer group. This avoids overstating precision and excludes director-level and unusually low/outlier comparisons. CORE MANAGEMENT PEER GROUP MARKET CUTS RANGE DECISION City Position Year Match Tier Hourly Min Hourly Max Annual Min Annual Max Core Peer? City Blend? Lynnwood Assistant Court Administrator 2026 Primary / upper anchor $59.95 $77.18 $124,696 $160,534 Yes Yes Lynnwood Probation Supervisor 2026 Lower anchor $45.04 $57.99 $93,683 $120,619 No Yes Lynnwood Probation Officer 2026 Reference only $43.23 $54.67 $89,918 $113,714 No No Edmonds Assistant Court Administrator 2026 Primary / upper anchor $54.89 $73.56 $114,171 $153,005 Yes Yes Edmonds Senior Probation Officer 2026 Lower anchor $46.47 $59.31 $96,658 $123,365 No Yes Edmonds Probation Officer 2026 Reference only $44.26 $56.48 $92,061 $117,478 No No Longview No direct City position 2026 Not usable No No Comparable-City Analysis — 2026 Primary municipal comparators identified by the City: Lynnwood, Edmonds, and Longview. Hourly rates are from official 2026 schedules. Scope Notes Official Source Formal supervision, evaluations, policy/procedure, accounting and court operations; broader court-wide scope and approximately nine court https://d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net/lynnwoodwa/6565eb07-c5cb- 11f0-a7da-005056a89546-f7ca5fad-a833-40cd-a821-495da88ccc9b- Direct probation supervision, but narrower than the updated Administrator’s budget, contracts, grants, policy and outcome- https://d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net/lynnwoodwa/6565eb07-c5cb- 11f0-a7da-005056a89546-f7ca5fad-a833-40cd-a821-495da88ccc9b- Practitioner-level role; materially below the updated Administrator scope. https://d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net/lynnwoodwa/6565eb07-c5cb- 11f0-a7da-005056a89546-f7ca5fad-a833-40cd-a821-495da88ccc9b- Supervises and evaluates staff; oversees policies, fiscal operations, records, purchasing and court performance. Broader court-wide scope and acts for Court Administrator. https://cdnsm5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_16494932/File/Governm ent/Departments/Human%20Resources/Salaries%20%26%20Wages/2 Senior practitioner/lead benchmark; lacks the full Administrator-level organizational accountability. https://cdnsm5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_16494932/File/Governm ent/Departments/Human%20Resources/Salaries%20%26%20Wages/2 Practitioner benchmark; materially narrower. https://cdnsm5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_16494932/File/Governm ent/Departments/Human%20Resources/Salaries%20%26%20Wages/2 Longview contracts municipal-court services to Cowlitz County District Court; excluded from salary calculations.https://www.mylongview.com/346/Legal-Department Employer Position Annual Min Annual Max Hourly Min Hourly Max Market Use BREMERTON Probation and Treatment Court Director - Union Grade 18 $99,159 $116,928 $47.67 $56.22 Current KING COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Probation Director $149,904 $188,462 $72.07 $90.61 Exclude KING COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Probation Manager $127,788 $160,430 $61.44 $77.13 Secondary KING COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Therapeutic Court Manager $127,788 $160,430 $61.44 $77.13 Secondary KITSAP COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Treatment Court Manager $106,014 $135,626 $50.97 $65.20 Core KITSAP COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Probation Supervisor $63,266 $83,061 $30.42 $39.93 Lower bound KITTITAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Chief Probation Officer $106,383 $129,632 $51.15 $62.32 Core SNOHOMOISH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Probation and Community Programs Manager $100,171 $127,847 $48.16 $61.46 Core SNOHOMOISH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT Therapeutic Court Program Supervisor $95,401 $121,759 $45.87 $58.54 Secondary TACOMA MUNICIPAL COURT Court Support Services Unit Manager (Probation Director)$122,096 $171,954 $58.70 $82.67 Secondary Provided Salary Survey Data Annual ranges are reproduced from the attached salary workbook. Hourly rates are formula-derived using 2,080 hours. Scope / Match Rationale Source Current Bremerton range Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Director-level; significantly larger county scope Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Manager-level; larger county scale Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Manager-level; larger county scale Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Strong program-management match Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Narrower supervision and low outlier Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Strong probation leadership match Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Strong dual-program management match; larger county Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Relevant program oversight but below administrator scope Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Broader/larger municipal-court unit Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Factor Earlier Scope Updated Administrator Scope Pay Effect Market Interpretation Evidence Overall accountability Hybrid practitioner with general oversight Overall administration and day-to-day operations of Probation and Treatment Court Higher Moves benchmark from senior officer/supervisor toward manager/administrator Revised General Function Reporting relationship Not clearly defined Reports directly to Municipal Court Judge Higher Greater organizational visibility and independent accountability Revised General Function Formal supervision General oversight; no explicit evaluation/discipline Direct supervision, work assignment, evaluation, coaching and disciplinary recommendations Higher Requires supervisor/manager market references Essential Duties Staffing scope Not defined One current probation employee; planned addition of Case Manager or Probation Clerk Moderating Small present headcount limits use of large-court manager ranges Essential Duties Budget No explicit budget authority Administers approximately $130,000 annual operating budget Higher / moderated Real fiscal accountability, but modest budget size General Function and Essential Duties Policy and compliance Applies existing requirements Develops and updates policies, procedures and operational standards Higher Administrator-level organizational authority Essential Duties Grants and contracts Referral and vendor coordination Funding proposals, grant compliance, contract development and administration within delegated authority Higher Adds external funding and procurement accountability Essential Duties Program evaluation Participant-level monitoring Performance measures, statistics, outcomes and operational improvements Higher Manager/program administrator benchmark Essential Duties Casework Substantial hands-on monitoring and participant services Limited caseload and advanced coverage as needed Higher Primary value is management, not caseload production General Function Minimum qualifications Two years general related experience Four years progressive experience plus two years supervisory/lead/program administration and budget/policy experience Higher Supports management-level market placement Minimum Requirements Updated Job Scope and Market Position Comparison of the revised Administrator description to the earlier scope used in the prior analysis. OVERALL CLASSIFICATION CONCLUSION The revised classification most closely aligns with a Probation and Treatment Court Administrator / Program Manager. It should be positioned above probation supervisors and senior officers, near treatment-court managers and chief probation officers, and below full court administrators, large-county directors and large-unit managers. Source Supports URL / File Notes Revised Bremerton job description Target duties, qualifications and organizational scope Attached: Probation_and_Treatment_Court_Administrator_Revised(1).docx Reports to Municipal Court Judge; supervises one current employee; planned growth; approximately $130,000 budget. Provided salary workbook Bremerton current range and county/municipal market data Attached: Copy of Probation Trmt Crt Director Salaries.xlsx Annual rates converted to hourly using 2,080 hours. City of Lynnwood 2026 salary schedule Assistant Court Administrator, Probation Supervisor and Probation Officer rates https://d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net/lynnwoodwa/6565eb07-c5cb-11f0-a7da- 005056a89546-f7ca5fad-a833-40cd-a821-495da88ccc9b-1779398195.pdf Official 2026 hourly schedule embedded in City Council materials. City of Lynnwood Assistant Court Administrator flyer Scope and responsibilities https://www.lynnwoodwa.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/municipal-court/assistant- court-administrator-recruitment-flyer.pdf Supervision, evaluation, accounting, collections, jury management, policies and procedures; broader court-wide role. City of Edmonds job descriptions Classification titles and grades https://www.edmondswa.gov/government/departments/human_resources/job_descriptio ns Assistant Court Administrator NR-37; Probation Officer NE-33; Senior Probation Officer NE-34. Sources, Assumptions and Method Notes City of Edmonds Assistant Court Administrator description Scope and responsibilities https://www.edmondswa.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_16494932/File/Government/Dep artments/Human%20Resources/Job%20Descriptions/Non%20Represented/Assistant% 20Court%20Administrator%20rev-003.pdf Supervision, fiscal operations, policies, records, purchasing and performance; broader court-wide role. City of Edmonds 2026 AFSCME schedule Probation Officer and Senior Probation Officer rates https://cdnsm5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_16494932/File/Government/Department s/Human%20Resources/Salaries%20%26%20Wages/2026%20Wages/2026_AFSCME _Wages_2.7_COLA_FINAL.pdf Official 2026 schedule. City of Edmonds 2026 non-represented schedule Assistant Court Administrator rate https://cdnsm5- hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_16494932/File/Government/Department s/Human%20Resources/Salaries%20%26%20Wages/2026%20Wages/2026_NonRepr esented_Wages_2.7_COLA_FINAL.pdf Official 2026 schedule. City of Longview Legal Department Court-service structure https://www.mylongview.com/346/Legal-Department Municipal-court services are provided through contract with Cowlitz County District Court; no direct City pay comparator. Annualization Hourly × 2,080 hours. Market year 2026 nominal pay ranges; no geographic or benefit-value adjustment. Core peer method Equal-weighted mean of five primary management peers; mean and median shown for sensitivity. Exclusions Longview has no direct City classification. King County Probation Director, Tacoma large-unit manager and Kitsap low probation- supervisor outlier are not used in the primary calculation. METHOD NOTES Internal equity Final adopted range should align with the closest City bargaining-unit grade and preserve appropriate differentials from supervised classifications. Classification caution Non-exempt and Teamsters status were retained in the job description; validate those designations separately against actual duties and the labor agreement. Bremerton Municipal Court Community Treatment Court FTE Proposal: PROBATION AND TREATMENT COURT ADMINISTRATOR Judge Weaver takes bench on January 1, 2026. The BMC Therapeutic Court is effectively defunct. •No participants (final participant graduated in February, 2026). •No funding. •There are many in the legal community who believe it is best to terminate the program. •No Treatment Coordinator or infrastructure. THE NEED Americans Dead. . . From fentanyl overdose 1999-2025: 520,395 American combat deaths in WWII, Korean War, Vietnam War, Gulf War, and War on Terror (through January, 2025) combined: 507,473 State v. Blake February 25, 2021 •“Legislative acquiescence has locked our old interpretation of RCW 69.50.4013 into that drug possession statute. But that interpretation makes that statute criminalize innocent and passive possession, even by a defendant who does not know, and has no reason to know, that drugs lay hidden within something that they possess. The legislature's police power goes far, but not that far. RCW 69.50.4013(1)—the portion of the simple drug possession statute creating this crime— violates the due process clauses of the state and federal constitutions and is void.” Legislative Response to Blake Senate Bill 5476, May 13, 2021. •Reenacted drug possession laws and made it illegal to knowingly possess a controlled substance. •Reduced drug possession from a Class C felony to a misdemeanor punishable by up to 180 days in jail. •Explicitly states, “The prosecutor is encouraged to divert cases under this section for assessment, treatment, or other services.” •Authorized funding for expanded recovery support services program. RCW 71.24.135. Among the needs to be addressed by the program include: •(a) Recovery housing; •(b) Employment pathways, support, training, and job placement, including evidence-based supported employment program services; •(c) Education pathways, including recovery high schools and collegiate recovery programs; •(d) Recovery coaching and substance use disorder peer support; •(e) Social connectedness initiatives, including the recovery café model; •(f) Family support services, including family reconciliation services; •(g) Technology-based recovery support services; •(h) Transportation assistance; and •(i) Legal support services. Impact on CLJ was immediate and profound •YEAR State Kitsap Superior BMC •2016 5,620 229 0 •2017 5,875 275 0 •2018 6,078 330 0 •2019 5,727 346 0 •2020 4,913 254 0 •2021 1,665 74 0 Supreme Court decides State v. Blake on February 25, 2021. Legislature reinstates statute May 13, 2021, making drug possession a misdemeanor. •2022 45 0 0 •2023 63 0 210 (11% of all filings) •2024 100 3 335 (17.2% of all filings) •2025 98 3 329 (17.2% of all filings) •2026 TBD TBD 279 (19.3 % through August 28) Typical Sentences for Drug Possessio n Charges •An average sentence of 33 days in jail, ranging from 7 days to 180 days, with a median sentence of 17 days (based upon a random sampling of jail sentences since January 1, 2026) •Active probation with substance abuse evaluation and treatment. •With a jail rate of $214 per person per day, this comes to a $7,062 per person, with a median cost of $3,638 per person. •Projected cost to City to incarcerate 14 hypothetical defendants for 17 days: $50,932 Probation •The transfer of drug possession charges from the Superior Court to BMC has resulted in a sharp increase in the need for Probation services and direct intervention in chemical dependency, mental health, and domestic violence services •Recommended maximum probation case load per officer: 70 •Current Probation Case Load: •126 active probationers •Another 70 probationers on warrant status BMC creates Therapeutic Court. Judge Flood is suspended by CJC in January, 2025. Interim Judge James Armstrong assumes primary responsibilities. Therapeutic Court Coordinator left unstaffed and unfunded with no new participants for remainder of year. July 1, 2025-June 30, 2026 $5,000 (all designated for training) Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) authorizes renewable grant for Therapeutic Court. City Council authorizes a Level 15 position for Therapeutic Court Coordinator. AOC grant applications due in early May each year. July 1, 2022-June 20, 2024 $215,896 July 1, 2023-June 30, 2024 $212,000 July 1, 2024-June 30, 2025 $144,300 Judge Tracy Flood takes bench on January 1, 2022. April 23, 2026 •Spearheaded by Probation Officer Alexis Green (nee Reeves), BMC hosts a meeting of community partners to discuss future of Therapeutic Court. •Over 20 people attend representing 10 community partners •Therapeutic Court receives overwhelming support from community partners Community Partners SPAR Program West Sound Treatment (WST) Agape Treatment WST Liason Program Agape REAL Program Forensic Navigator Program (DSHS) Trueblood (Competency ) Program Kitsap Mental Health Services (KMHS) YWCA Commonstree t Counseling Implementations to Community Treatment Court Following April 23 Meeting •West Sound Treatment (WST), led by Dr. Ken Wilson, dedicated a full-time treatment counselor to BMC for the first time •Courthouse on-site treatment evaluations, within easy walking distance from Salvation Army •Improved access to housing •Improved access to public transportation and private rides, permitting participants to actively engage in treatment •Furloughs with WST bussing to allow potential participants to attend CTC from the jail Spring, 2026 Community Treatment Court AOC required BMC to apply for a grant as a first time applicant. Rebranded as Community Treatment Court (CTC) Community –Designed to assist participants in addressing housing, transportation, and social needs Treatment –Designed to address chemical dependency and mental health treatment needs In June of 2026, AOC authorizes grant of $81,700, of which $66,454 is allocated for a 50% treatment coordinator. Community Treatment Court February 1, 2026 •No participants •No funding •There are many in the legal community who believe it is best to terminate the program •No Treatment Coordinator September 1, 2026 8 Participants State funds to provide for treatment coordinator, training, and misc. costs Strong support from community partners, City Attorneys Office, defense attorneys, and Judge Continuing need. Program cannot be sustained without Coordinator PROBATION AND TREATMENT COURT ADMINISTRATOR Plan, organize, direct, and evaluate day-to- day operations of Probation and Community Treatment Court 1 Supervise assigned Probation and Treatment Court staff 2 Oversee Probation and Treatment Court service delivery 3 Oversee grant/state funding application to AOC and manage department budgeting 4 Fiscal Impact Defund current Treatment Coordinator position (Level 15) Create new position: Probation and Treatment Court Administrator (Level 18) Retain current Probation Officer position (Level 15) After factoring in state funding of $66,454, fiscal impact would be $50,474 Projected savings to City to divert rather than incarcerate 14 hypothetical defendants for 17 days: $50,932 Therapeutic Court Position Change From support classification to proposed court administrator classification —cost and funding impact shown from the workbook. PROPOSED 09/09/2026 Original 10/04/2022 Therapeutic Court Coordinator Grade 10 Current 01/01/2026 Service Support Specialist Grade 15 Proposed 09/09/2026 Probation & Treatment Court Administrator Grade 18 Classification change The proposed action moves the position from a Grade 15 Service Support Specialist to a Grade 18 Probation & Treatment Court Administrator. Grade 15 Support Svc Grade 18 Administrator Cost and funding view Current values use 01/01/2026. Proposed compensation uses the low end of the salary range. Total compensation Current $115,253 Proposed $128,907 Grant support Original $215,900 Proposed $66,454 General Fund need Current $0 Proposed $62,453 Net General Fund need $0 $62.5k Increased estimated General Fund support needed, driven by the decreased grant support reflected in the proposed column. Key figures Salary $88,656 $99,159–$116,928 Grade 15 18 Total comp. $115,253 $128,907 Grant support $215,900 $66,454 Source: Therapeutic Court Analysis.xlsx, Sheet1. General Fund need shown as absolute value of workbook formula. Page 1 of 1 Resolution Document Reference Rev. 03/2024 RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, giving 8th Street between Warren Avenue and Pacific Avenue an honorable designation of Bishop L. Robertson Way. WHEREAS, a Citizens group has requested that 8th Street between Warren Avenue and Pacific Avenue be renamed to honor Bishop Lawrence Ray Robertson; and WHEREAS, staff coordinated with CENCOM on the request and concluded that Bishop L. Robertson Way was an approved name, formal letters were sent out to all owners and residents on 8th Street between Warren Avenue and Pacific Avenue, and neighborhood outreach was conducted by the citizen’s group; and WHEREAS, for nearly five decades, Bishop Lawrence Ray Robertson faithfully served as Senior Pastor of Emmanuel Apostolic Church in Bremerton. Guided by faith and an unwavering commitment to public service, he devoted his life to strengthening individuals, families, and neighborhoods while advancing education, youth development, community health, economic opportunity, and civic engagement throughout Bremerton and Kitsap County; and WHEREAS, Bishop Robertson founded the New Life Community Development Agency to expand educational opportunities, workforce development, economic growth, youth programming, and family support services; founded the Bremerton Jaguars Track Club to mentor generations of young people through athletics, leadership, and academic achievement; and established the Marvin Williams Recreation Center and C. Keith Birkenfeld Empowerment Center, as an enduring center for education, recreation, health promotion, mentorship, and community services for residents of all ages; and WHEREAS, through visionary and collaborative leadership, Bishop Robertson united government, education, business, healthcare, philanthropy, nonprofit organizations, and the faith community to secure resources, build strategic partnerships, and improve the quality of life throughout Bremerton, Kitsap County, and the Pacific Northwest; and WHEREAS, his distinguished record of public service included leadership as Chairman of the Olympic College Board of Trustees, Commissioner of the Bremerton Housing Authority, Chairman of the Pacific Northwest District Council, and numerous other civic, educational, and nonprofit organizations, leaving a lasting legacy of leadership, unity, and community transformation; and WHEREAS, designating 8th Street as honorable Bishop L. Robertson Way permanently recognizes a lifetime devotion to strengthening the Bremerton community, of distinguished leadership, public service, youth development, community partnership, and civic achievement that continues to benefit the residents of Bremerton and greater Kitsap County; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Honorary Designation. An honorary designation of the city street 8th Street from Warren Avenue to Pacific Avenue is hereby established as Bishop L. Robertson Way. SECTION 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this _____ day of __________________, 20____. Jane Rebelowski, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: KYLIE J. FINNELL, City Attorney ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk R:\Legal\Legal\Forms\FORMS ON COBWEB\Resolution Rev. 03 2024.doc AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Study Session Date: September 9, 2026 Resolution giving 8th Street between Warren Ave and Pacific Avenue an honorary designation of Bishop L. Robertson Way COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 16, 2026 Department: City Council Presenter: Pres. Jane Rebelowski Phone: (360) 473-5280 SUMMARY: During the August 19, 2026, City Council Business meeting a motion was made for the honorary designation of 8th Street between Warren Ave and Pacific Ave as Bishop L. Robertson Way. No resolution or ordinance was adopted, nor are they required. However, afterward the City received the attached correspondence from Dr. Lillian Robertson requesting a formal resolution be passed. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Correspondence 2) Resolution No. FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution No.____ approving the honorary designation of 8th Street between Warren Ave and Pacific Ave as Bishop L. Robertson Way. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 04/19/2024 A2 Item added 9/9/26 10:45 AM AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Study Session Date: September 9, 2026 Proposed Public Hearing on Zoning Code Amendments to Bremerton Municipal Code Section 20.46.090 and Temporary Encampment Permit COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 16, 2026 Department: DCD Presenter: Garrett Jackson Phone: (360) 473-5289 SUMMARY: The Bremerton Housing Authority (BHA) has made an application (file #BP26 00105) to amend Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) 20.46.090 which governs Temporary Encampment Permits. The applicant requests an amendment to expand eligibility for a 3-year Temporary Encampment Permit to the Multi-Use Zone of the Harrison Heights Subarea Plan, which includes the property located at 1231 Sheridan Road. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on August 17, 2026 and concluded that the proposed zoning code amendment does not meet Text Amendment criteria of approval established per BMC 20.18.020(d), and therefore recommended the City Council deny the application. Materials considered by the Planning Commission are included in the August 17, 2026 Planning Commission Packet, and include a Staff Report, submitted application materials, received public comments, and other documents. Potential motions are as follows: Planning Commission Recommended Motion: Move to accept the Findings and Conclusions of the Planning Commission, which conclude that Application BP26 00105 requesting changes to Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) section BMC 20.46.090 Temporary Encampment Permits does not meet the code amendment criteria established by BMC 20.18.020(d), and is therefore denied. Alternative Motion: Move to reject the Findings and Conclusions of the Planning Commission for Application BP26 00105 requesting changes to Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) section BMC 20.46.090 Temporary Encampment Permits, and direct staff to perform SEPA review and prepare an ordinance for future public hearing which adds the Multi-Use Zone of the Harrison Heights Subarea Plan to zones eligible for a 3-year Temporary Encampment Permit per BMC 20.46.090(h)(1)(ii)(a). ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Findings & Conclusions Presentation FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☒ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to accept the Findings and Conclusions of the Planning Commission, which conclude that Application BP26 00105 requesting changes to Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) section BMC 20.46.090 Temporary Encampment Permits does not meet the code amendment criteria established by BMC 20.18.020(d), and is therefore denied. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 04/19/2024 C1 Zoning Code Amendments: Public Hearing Bremerton Housing Authority Proposal Temporary Encampment Permit (BMC 20.46.090) Presenter: Garrett Jackson September 16, 2026 1 Applicant Proposal The Bremerton Housing Authority (BHA) has made an application (file #BP26 00105) to amend Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) 20.46.090 which governs Temporary Encampment Permits. The applicant requests an amendment to expand eligibility for a 3-year Temporary Encampment Permit to the Multi-Use Zone of the Harrison Heights Subarea Plan, which includes the property located at 1231 Sheridan Road. 2 SHERIDAN SITE ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS TIMELINE January 2024 –August 2026 JAN 2024 City Council Resolution 3375 Hybrid low-barrier walk- up congregate and pallet shelter, to open fall 2024 JUL 2024 Ordinance 5494 City Council adopts BHA proposed zoning code amendments allowing 3-year Temporary Encampment Permits AUG 2024 DCD Communication to BHA 3-year Temporary Encampment would not be permitted at the Sheridan Site; an Indoor Emergency Shelter would DEC 2024 Interlocal Agreement City Council ILA with BHA for a hybrid congregate and pallet shelter “in accordance with applicable laws and regulations” AUG 2025 Pre-submittal Conference BHA conference with City for hybrid congregate and pallet shelter SEP 2025 City Council Study Session BHA presents at City Council Study Session NOV 2025 Sheridan Site Purchased BHA purchases 1231 Sheridan Site JAN 2026 City Council Study Session BHA presents at City Council Study Session MAY 2026 Pre-submittal Conference BHA conference with City for pallet shelter only MAY 2026 Application Withdrawn BHA withdraws application for Zoning Code Amendments for May 18 Planning Commission meeting JUN 2026 Complete Application Submitted BHA submits complete application for Zoning Code Amendment JUN 2026 Planning Commission Workshop JUL 2026 Planning Commission Workshop AUG 2026 Planning Commission Public Hearing Planning Commission Recommendation 4 No Code Change 5 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on August 17, 2026 and concluded that the proposed zoning code amendment does not meet Text Amendment criteria of approval established per BMC 20.18.020(d), and therefore recommends the City Council deny the application. Criteria of Approval 6 Criteria of Approval (BMC 20.18) Per BMC 20.18.010, text amendments may be necessary when changing circumstances or conditions justify updates to the Zoning Code’s development regulations, provided those changes remain consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (1)It is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (2)It does not conflict with other City, state and federal codes, regulations and ordinances. 7 Review 8 9 City of Olympia City of Everett City of Seattle STEP HOUSING TEMPORARY ENCAMPMENT •RCW 35.21.915 •Temporary accommodations that do not meet building code or local development standards •Do not count toward growth targets •Washington State Building Code Council is currently considering draft regulations for Temporary Emergency Shelters •RCW 35.21.683 •STEP means Indoor emergency Shelter, Transitional housing, Emergency housing, and/or Permanent supportive housing •Structures meet local development standards •Bremerton has completed code amendments to support STEP housing Washington State Department of Commerce Guidance Temporary Encampments cannot be counted towards a jurisdiction’s Comprehensive Plan local housing need allocations. Temporary Encampments are elective and not required by the State of Washington. The Washington State Department of Commerce first published this guidance in a July 2024 STEP Model Ordinance document. This information was not available when the Planning Commission originally recommended code amendments to the City Council allowing 3-year encampments in May of 2024. Commerce guidance was reaffirmed in June 2026. 10 June 2026 Chapter 232, Laws of 2026 (HB 2266): STEP Siting and Permitting 11 Housing Goals are for Permanent Structures, not Temporary Structures WA Department of Commerce estimates 1.1 million new homes will be needed in Washington State by 2044. Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) estimates 830,000 new homes will be needed in the Puget Sound by 2050. Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council (KRCC) estimates 32,950 new homes will be needed in Kitsap by 2044. Bremerton Comprehensive Plan estimates 9,556 new homes will be needed in the City by 2044. Harrison Heights Subarea Plan estimate 1,695 new homes will be needed in the City by 2044. NOTE:Housing goals do not apply to temporary structures -Examples H3(I), H3(G), H2(H), etc. Department of Commerce Example: Permanent Structure Example: Temporary Structure Recent Updates to Permanent Housing Types Recent Code Updates in Bremerton Increases in density and maximum structure height Accessory Dwelling Units Pre-approved ADU Program Middle Housing Multifamily Citywide Multifamily Conversion Co-Living Housing STEP Housing Unit Lot Subdivision Affordable Housing Bonus No Minimum Parking Citywide 12 According to the Department of Commerce, “Rising rents, combined with lagging income growth and a lack of housing supply, are the core causes of increased homelessness in the State.” Temporary Encampment Permit (BMC 20.46.090) Existing Code Section 183-Day Temporary Encampment Permit •Type I Permit allowed in all zoning districts •Outreach to police, fire, school, childcare, and health district •Neighborhood meeting (mailed notification within 500-feet) •Agree to inspections from Police, Fire, Building, Health District •Plans for Security, sanitation, trash, setbacks, and screening •Establish Code of Conduct eligibility 3-year Temporary Encampment Permit (Elective) •Type II Conditional Use Permit •Social services provided onsite •Accommodations composed of durable/rigid materials •Eligible for smaller ½ acres sites •Allowed in select zoning districts (see May 18 PC Packet)13 Non-rigid materials Rigid materials Commerce Guidance 14 Existing Zones, 3-Year Temporary Encampment: District Center Core, General Commercial, Freeway Corridor, Industrial Zone, and Puget Sound Industrial Center Excluding City Watershed and Utility Lands, this represents approximately 42% of all property area in the City. Comprehensive Plan 15 Is it consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? 16 Regionally Coordinated Planning: Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A) Department of Commerce Guidance Documents Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Multicounty Planning Policies (MPPs) Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council (KRCC) Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Goals & Policies LU1(B). Coordinate Bremerton's growth consistent with the Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies, the Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2050, and State requirements. Harrison Heights Countywide Center 17 PSRC Multicounty Planning Policies MPP-RGS-11. Encourage growth in designated countywide centers. KRCC Countywide Planning Policies KRCC CPP C-1. Centers are focal points of growth within Kitsap County. In decisions relating to population and employment growth and resource allocation supporting growth, Centers have a high priority. Bremerton Comprehensive Plan H2(H). Provide sufficient land for the city’s projected population and housing targets, especially in the City’s Centers and accessible to transit. NOTE:Approximately 70-percent of all future housing units needed by 2044 are planned within Centers, with Harrison Heights accounting for 17% of the total housing units planned. Harrison Heights Subarea Plan HH(10). Support the transformation of underutilized lands, such as surplus public property, parking lots, or environmentally contaminated lands that are cleaned up, to higher-density, mixed-use development, or amenities, aligned with the vision for the area. Accommodates Bremerton’s fair share of the Countywide need Bremerton Comprehensive Plan H3(B). Encourage rental and subsidized housing near public transportation, employment opportunities, and throughout the City in a manner that accommodates Bremerton’s fair share of the Countywide need. Kitsap County Homeless Housing Plan 2025-2030 Homeless crisis response providers identified several critical gaps that hinder progress including, “Geographic disparities, with services concentrated in Bremerton.” KRCC Countywide Planning Policies “2020 snapshot” shows Bremerton provides substantially more housing for those experiencing homelessness than other Kitsap jurisdictions.18 19 Kitsap County Homeless Housing Plan 2025-2030 Existing & Projected Services https://www.kitsap.gov/hs/HOUSINGBLOCK/Kitsap%20Homeless%20Housing%20Plan%202025-2030%20-%20FINAL%2012.10.25.pdf Kitsap County Regional Approach to Homelessness Kitsap County Point-in-Time Count 2026 46% self-reported a Bremerton location No unincorporated option Kitsap County Homeless Housing Plan 2025-2030 Comprehensive Plans for all Kitsap jurisdictions each contain provisions addressing homelessness Kitsap County HEART team (Homeless Encampment Action, Response, and Transitions) connects individuals countywide in unsanctioned encampments to stable housing and services 20 21 Bremerton City Limits and Bremerton Addresses US Census Data •Bremerton 13.8% poverty rate median household income $ 74,940. •Bainbridge Island 3.5% poverty rate median household income $172,188 •Kitsap County 7.8% poverty rate median household income $ 104,158 •Port Orchard 9.7% poverty rate median household income $ 89,795 •Poulsbo 9.3% poverty rate median household income $116,250 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/ Bremerton STEP Examples Since 2020 22 Planning Commission Recommended Motion 23 Planning Commission Recommended Motion Move to accept the Findings and Conclusions of the Planning Commission, which conclude that Application BP26 00105 requesting changes to Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) section BMC 20.46.090 Temporary Encampment Permits does not meet the code amendment criteria established by BMC 20.18.020(d), and is therefore denied. 24