HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/17/2025 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
______________________________________________________________________________
CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 100, Bremerton, WA 98337 - Phone (360) 473-5280
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2025
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
1. BRIEFING: 5:00 – 5:30 P.M. in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603
A. Review of Agenda
B. General Council Business (Only as necessary)
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. in FIRST FLOOR CHAMBERS
3. MAYOR'S REPORT
4. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Claims and Check Register
B. Minutes of Council Meeting – September 3, 2025
C. Minutes of Study Session – September 10, 2025
D. Purchase of Ford F-750 truck with Hook-lift System and Snowplow
E. Conservation Grant Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for LED Retrofit Phase 6
F. Contract Modification Agreement No. 7 with Parametrix, Inc. for Engineering Services
for the Kitsap Lake Park Renovation Project
G. Resolution No. 3404 to Modify Parking on a portion of Almira Avenue from head-in to back-in angle
parking
H. Local Programs State Funding Agreement with WSDOT for the 6th Street Active Transportation
Project
Council Members and staff will be participating in the meeting in-person, and the public is invited to attend.
Or beginning at 5:30 PM, the public may participate remotely through one of the following options:
To stream online only (via BKAT Feed, with no interaction possible):
https://bremerton.vod.castus.tv/vod/?live=ch1&nav=live
Members of the public are invited to join the Zoom Meeting by clicking on the link below:
https://bremertonwa-gov.zoom.us/j/89694813320?pwd=Z0JvSXNhSFp1c0xhL1NxUjRhN20xUT09
Or One tap mobile:
US: +12532050468…89694813320#...*173061# or +12532158782…89694813320#...*173061#
Or Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 253 205 0468 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 669 444 9171 or +1 669 900 6833
Webinar ID: 896 9481 3320; Passcode: 173061
Public comments or questions for the record may be submitted ahead of time to City.Council@bremertonwa.gov
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special
accommodations please contact the City Clerk at (360) 473-5323 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
Continued on next page
5. PUBLIC RECOGNITION – To address the Council on any issues not already on the agenda.
Please state your name for the record in person and limit your comments to under 3-minutes.
6. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Renewal of Professional Services Agreement with Imperial Parking, Inc. for Parking Enforcement
and Management Services
7. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
8. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
A. 10-Minutes to discuss Potential Litigation as allowed under RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
Public Comments will be accepted on this item, with action anticipated
B. 30-Minutes to discuss Legal Risks of Current or Proposed Action as allowed under
RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) No action anticipated
9. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: N/A
Claims & Check Register COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 17, 2025
Department: Legal Services
Presenter: Angela Hoover
Phone: (360) 473-5323
SUMMARY: Approval of the following checks and electronic fund transfers:
1. Check Numbers 412243 – 412395 and EFT Numbers V44392 - V44500 in the grand total
amount of $3,991,339.57
2. Regular Payroll for pay period ending August 31, 2025 in the amount of $1,111,970.75
3. Regular Payroll Payout for the pay period ending August 31, 2025 in the amount of $423.15
ATTACHMENTS:
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☒ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Claims & Check Register as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 04/19/2024
4A
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Minutes of Council Meeting – September 3,
2025
Study Session Date: N/A
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 17, 2025
Department: City Council
Presenter: Council President
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: The Minutes for the Council Meeting held on September 3, 2025 are attached.
ATTACHMENTS: Council Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☒ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Mo ve to approve the September 3, 2025 Council Meeting Minutes as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 04/19/2024
4B
CITY COUNCIL HYBRID MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, September 3, 2025
The bi-weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order Wednesday,
August 3, 2025, at 5:00 PM in Council Conference Room 603 of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER,
345 6th Street, in Bremerton, Washington, with Council President Eric Younger presiding. Council
Members present were Jennifer Chamberlin, Denise Frey, Jeff Coughlin, Jane Rebelowski, and Michael
Goodnow. Council member Anna Mockler was absent. At 5:30 PM, the meeting moved to the First Floor
Meeting Chambers. Also present were City Attorney Kylie Finnell; City Clerk Angela Hoover; Legislative
Office Manager Anne Williams; and IT Systems Administrator Scott Erickson.
President Younger announced the City Council is conducting the Council Meeting in-person, and
because community involvement is encouraged, the public is invited to also join the meeting in
person or participate via a remote option through Zoom or view on BKAT ; and encouraged anyone
who wishes to speak tonight, to print their name clearly on the sign-in sheet to be included in the final
meeting record.
MAYOR’S REPORT – Mayor Wheeler provided highlights of the following:
Bremerton ranked No. 2 out of 148 beach communities according to Consumer Affairs report
Beautify Bremerton Day on Saturday, September 13th from 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM
Naval Avenue 1st to 15th Bicycle & Pedestrian Enhancements Project Open House on
September 18th from 5:00 to 7:00 PM at the Naval Avenue Elementary School
6TH Street Active Transportation Improvement Project Open House on September 30th from
5:00 to 7:00 PM at the Norm Dicks Government Center
CONSENT AGENDA
4A – Check Numbers 412047 through 412242 and Electronic Fund Transfers Numbers V44298
through V44391 in the grand total amount of $2,858,923.34; Regular Payroll for pay period
ending August 15, 2025 in the amount of $1,164,307.37; Regular Payroll Payout for the pay
period ending August 15, 2025 in the amount of $8,737.42; Regular Payroll Correction for the
pay period ending August 15, 2025 in the amount of $2,025.70; and Retiree Payroll for pay
period ending August 31, 2025 in the amount of $37,832.38
4B – Minutes of Council Meeting – August 20, 2025
4C – Minutes of Study Session – August 27, 2025
4D – Resolution No. 3402 to establish October 1, 2025 as the public hearing date for the vacation
of right-of-way on 26th Street, west of Phinney Bay Drive
4E – Resolution No. 3403 to establish October 1, 2025 as the public hearing date for the vacation
of the alley located between 5th & 6th Streets, west of Veneta Avenue
4F – Approve Upgrade of Budget Analyst to Budget Manager; and Approve Salary at Pay Band 14
of the Management, Professional, Confidential, and Fiduciary Salary Plan
4G – Approve Human Resources Director Salary at Pay Band 21 of the Management, Professional,
Confidential, and Fiduciary Salary Plan; and Approve Job Description
Questions and comments from the public were submitted by Jose Camacho (4B), Robin Weldin (4B).
5:47 PM M/S/C/U (Frey/Chamberlin) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented.
Motion carried unanimously.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, September 3, 2025
Page 2 of 3
President Younger announced that as indicated on the Agenda, Public Recognition provides an
opportunity for attendees to address the Council on any issue not already on tonight’s agenda and
provided a reminder that now that it is election season, to refrain from any comments on political
campaigns or ballot measures. There will be no public comments accepted via Zoom, unless prior
arrangements were made through the City Clerk by calling (360) 473-5323 at least 24-hours prior to
the meeting. We only ask that you state your name for the record and please limit your comments to
3-minutes or less. A timer system will be used so that everyone is treated fairly.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION – Questions and comments from the public were submitted by Mary Lou
Long, Mark L’Esperance, Joslyn LaMadrid, Robin Weldin, Monica Houston, Kathie Lustig, Kimmy
Siebens, Jose Camacho, Gayla Breach
GENERAL BUSINESS
6A – ORDINANCE NO. 5518 TO AMEND BREMERTON MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.78
ENTITLED “MULTI-FAMILY TAX EXEMPTION”: Council Vice President Jane Rebelowski
summarized that the proposed ordinance would eliminate the 12-year and 20-year tax exemptions for
multifamily housing as well as the 12-year extension option. The proposed ordinance would allow for
one 8-year exemption and would require that the multifamily housing receiving the exemption not be
owner occupied.
Questions or comments from the public were provided by Kathie Lustig, Robin Weldin, Noemi Levine,
Gayla Breach, Kimmy Siebens, Marva Lang, Alden Bradford, Jamie Clough, Monica Houston, Mary
Lou Long, Jose Camacho.
6:49 PM Motion was made by Goodnow; and Seconded by Frey. Questions or comments were
provided by Goodnow, Frey, Chamberlin, Rebelowski, Coughlin.
7:05 PM M/S/C/U (Goodnow/Frey) Move to pass Ordinance No. 5518 to amend Bremerton Municipal
Code Chapter 3.78 entitled “Multi-Family Tax Exemption”.
Motion carried unanimously.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Jennifer Chamberlin attended the Doc Luv the Kids event.
Denise Frey announced a Community Meeting on Wednesday, September 10th from 5:00 to 6:00 PM
for the new View Ridge Elementary School Arts Academy; and the Beautify Bremerton City Clean-Up
on Saturday, September 13th from 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM with the drop-off site in the parking lot at
Legion Field on 29th Street.
Jeff Coughlin reminded the community of the September 3rd deadline to comment on the Navy’s
Proposed Dry Dock Project; volunteers are welcome for the Downtown Tidy Up on Thursday,
September 4th from 5:30 to 6:30 PM starting from the Kitsap History Museum; announced Manette
Fest on Saturday, September 6th from 10:00 AM to 3:00 PM; Bridging Bremerton on Saturday,
September 13th at 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM starting from Evergreen Pizza.
Jane Rebelowski recognized the Tim Ryan Family for their contribution to Olympic College’s Health
Care Program; announced the next District 4 Town Hall Meeting on Tuesday, September 11th from
5:00 to 6:30 PM at Bremerton Foodline for a conversation on homelessness with featured Guest
Speakers Marwan Cameron of Gather Together, Grow Together and Dawn Michelle Wilson of Rock
The Block and Sox Box.
Michael Goodnow announced the First Friday Artwalk tomorrow; and the Wycoff Overpass Mural
Ribbon Cutting Ceremony on Friday, September 27th from 1:00 to 2:30 PM.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, September 3, 2025
Page 3 of 3
President Younger announced the next Study Session on Wednesday, September 10th beginning at
5:00 PM in the Council Conference Room. The public is welcome to attend the meeting in-person
or remotely via Zoom, but there will be no opportunity to comment, and no action will be taken.
With no further business, President Younger adjourned the Council Meeting at 7:26 PM.
Prepared & Submitted by:
ANNE WILLIAMS
Legislative Office Manager
APPROVED by the City Council on the 17th day of September 2025.
ERIC YOUNGER, City Council President
Attest:
ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk
EY:AH:AW
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Minutes of Study Session – September 10,
2025
Study Session Date: N/A
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 17, 2025
Department: City Council
Presenter: Council President
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: The Minutes for the Study Session held on September 10, 2025 are attached.
ATTACHMENTS: Council Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☒ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Mo ve to approve the September 10, 2025 Study Session Minutes as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 04/19/2024
4C
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES
Wednesday, September 10, 2025
A Study Session of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order on Wednesday,
September 10, 2025 at 5:00 PM in Council Conference Room 603 located in the Norm Dicks
Government Center at 345 6th Street, with Council President Eric Younger presiding. Other Council
Members present were Jennifer Chamberlin (remotely), Denise Frey, Jeff Coughlin, Jane
Rebelowski, Michael Goodnow. Council Member Anna Mockler was absent. Legislative Office
Manager Anne Williams provided staff support.
President Younger announced that Study Sessions are always open for the public to attend
in-person or view remotely; that tonight’s agenda was amended to add an Executive Session under
Item C1, with action anticipated; and that any of the items approved for action by the Council
tonight will be placed on the September 17, 2025 Council Meeting Agenda or as otherwise
determined.
It was further established that questions or comments by the public may be submitted on any item
at any time by email to City.Council@bremertonwa.gov. And reminded everyone that audio
recordings will be available online within a few days following the meeting.
A. AGENDA BILL BRIEFINGS
1. Purchase of Ford F-750 truck with Hook-lift System and Snowplow – Internal Services
Manager Matt Donleycott. To be placed on September 17 Council Meeting Consent
Agenda.
2. Renewal of Professional Services Agreement with Imperial Parking, Inc. for Parking
Enforcement and Management Services – Contracts Administrator Melinda Monroe. To be
placed on September 17 Council Meeting General Business.
3. Conservation Grant Agreement with Puget Sound Energy for LED Retrofit Phase 6 – Public
Works Operations Manager Ron Moore. To be placed on September 17 Council Meeting
Consent Agenda.
4. Contract Modification Agreement No. 7 with Parametrix, Inc. for Engineering Services
for the Kitsap Lake Park Renovation Project – Parks and Recreation Director Tim Barker. To
be placed on September 17 Council Meeting Consent Agenda.
5. Resolution to Modify Parking on a portion of Almira Avenue from head-in to back-in angle
parking – Engineering Project Manager Nick Ataie. To be placed on September 17 Council
Meeting Consent Agenda.
6. Local Programs State Funding Agreement with WSDOT for the 6th Street Active
Transportation Project – Engineering Project Manager Nick Ataie. To be placed on
September 17 Council Meeting Consent Agenda.
7. Ordinance to increase the Vehicle License Fee for funding Transportation Improvements –
Council Vice President Jane Rebelowski. Finance to come back with data on how funds
have been spent since 2015, in a format similar to how the TBD work plans were prepared,
as well as what Public Works staff feel they can accomplish with new funding. Continued
discussion to be scheduled for a future Study Session.
President Eric Younger called a break from 6:35 to 6:45 PM.
City Council Study Session Minutes
Wednesday, September 10, 2025
Page 2 of 3
2
B. GENERAL COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Public Safety Committee Briefing (Last Meeting 9/4/25) – Chair Michael Goodnow.
Reported: Legal provided an overview of alternatives to jail. Council Members expressed
interest in having the City Attorney prepare a white paper on this topic.
2. Regional and Other Committee/Board Briefings.
Reported: Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council meeting reviewed expected FIFA activities
and impact; the new 6 new pre-permitted ADU designs and KBA is working to create a do-
it-yourself toolkit and cost estimates for the buildings.
3. Other General Council Business. Council Members to participate on the HR Director
hiring committee to include President Younger, Vice President Rebelowski, and
Councilmember Goodnow.
C. EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 7:06 PM, President Younger announced the Council would meet for 15-Minutes to discuss
“Pending Litigation” as allowed under RCW 42.30.110 (i); and that action was anticipated.
At 7:21 PM, President Younger called the meeting back to order; and asked Assistant City
Attorney Brett Jette to explain the action before the Council.
Public Comment was received by Jose Camacho and Kimmy Siebens.
7:30 PM Motion was made by Rebelowski and seconded by Chamberlin.
7:30 PM M/S/C/U (Rebelowski/Chamberlin) Move to authorize the Settlement of the lawsuit filed by
Joseph Redal in the Western District of Washington, Cause number 323CV05782 for $400,000 and
authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the settlement and release pursuant to these terms.
Motion carried unanimously
President Younger also announced the next Council Meeting on Wednesday, September 17th
beginning at 5:30 PM in the First Floor Meeting Chambers of the Norm Dicks Government Center.
He further established that the public is invited to attend in person or remotely, but anyone wishing to
speak during Public Recognition via Zoom must submit their request through the City Clerk by calling
(360) 473-5323 or sending an email to City.Clerk@bremertonwa.gov at least 24-hours prior to the
meeting.
With no further business, the Study Session was adjourned at 7:31 PM.
Prepared & submitted by:
_____________________________
ANNE WILLIAMS
Legislative Office Manager
City Council Study Session Minutes
Wednesday, September 10, 2025
Page 3 of 3
3
APPROVED by the City Council on the 17th day of September, 2025.
ERIC YOUNGER, Council President
ATTEST:
______________________________
ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk
EY:AH:AW
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: 9/10/2025
Purchase of Ford F-750 truck with Hook-lift
System and Snowplow
COUNCIL MEETING Date: 9/17/2025
Department: PW&U
Presenter: Matt Donleycott
Phone: (360) 473-2316
SUMMARY: The City plans to purchase a new Ford F-750 truck equipped with a hook-lift system
and snow plow. The truck is priced at $82,651.75, and the hook-lift system and snowplow total
$77,740.64, resulting in a total project cost of $160,392.39.
This expenditure is fully covered under the approved 2022 Equipment Replacement Reserve (ERR)
budget, which has been carried forward. No additional funding is required.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Vehicle and equipment quotes
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☒ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve purchase of a new Ford F-750 truck with Hook-lift & snow plow and authorize the
Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as
presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 04/19/2024
4D
Published for
September 10
Study Session
Comments
Item A1
From: Matt Donleycott <Matt.Donleycott@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 8:25 AM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Jon Waters <JonWaters@pm.me>
Cc: Greg Wheeler <Greg.Wheeler@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Chance Berthiaume
<Chance.Berthiaume@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Mike Riley <Mike.Riley@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Ned Lever
<Ned.Lever@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: RE: Analysis and Concerns Regarding Proposed Purchase of Ford F-750 Truck with Hook-Lift and
Snowplow (Jon Waters)
Thank you for your comments, Mr. Waters.
The purchase of the Ford F-750, equipped with a hook lift and snowplow, represents the foundation
for the truck's overall intended use. This vehicle is replacing two of our older Ford F-550’s, which
both have snowplows. To ensure we maintain our snow removal capabilities, it was important that
the new truck includes similar functionality.
The truck’s year-round utility will depend on the ancillary equipment we acquire. The primary
addition will be a concrete mixer, which is the main reason for selecting a larger vehicle with a
higher weight capacity. Additional attachments under consideration include a roll-off dumpster,
chipper box, dump bed, flat bed, and de-icer tank.
With these potential configurations, the truck will serve a wide range of functions beyond snow
plowing, providing flexibility for various seasonal and operational needs
While used trucks can offer short-term savings, buying new ensures reliability, warranty coverage,
and longer service life—all critical factors when investing in a multi-purpose vehicle that will be
used year-round. A new truck also reduces the risk of unexpected repair costs and downtime,
which can significantly impact operations.
Matt Donleycott
City of Bremerton
Internal Services Manager
Matt.Donleycott@ci.bremerton.wa.us
From: Jon Waters <JonWaters@pm.me>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2025 4:50 PM
To: Greg Wheeler <greg.wheeler@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; City Council
<City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Analysis and Concerns Regarding Proposed Purchase of Ford F-750 Truck with Hook-Lift and
Snowplow
Introduction
This memo provides a comparative analysis and raises questions regarding the City of
Bremerton’s proposed purchase of a new Ford F-750 truck equipped with a hook-lift system and
snowplow, totaling $160,392.39. Given Bremerton’s climate and limited snowfall, this large
investment requires further justification and clarity on the operational plan to ensure responsible
use of public funds. They framed this truck like it's for snow, but priced it like it's for
everything. And I didn't hear anything about the ‘everything.’
Feature / Factor City's Plan (New F-750) Practical Alternative (Used Hook-
Lift or Plow Rig)
Total Cost $160,392.39 $85,000–$105,000 (avg. surplus
cost)
Truck Type Brand-new Ford F-750 (Class
7)
2–4 yr-old municipal truck (F-750,
M2, etc.)
Upfit New hook-lift + snow plow Already installed or modular
Snow Usage
Justification
Only function mentioned:
snow plow
Same capability (plow included or
retrofitted)
Multi-Use
Justification
�� Not explained
��� Could do dump hauling, leaf vac,
salt, etc.
Replacement
Justification
�� Not explained (What is
this replacing?)
��� If replacing, could be matched by
cheaper option
Fleet Utilization
Explained
�� None provided
��� Could be maximized seasonally
Days of Snow Per
Year(avg.) 0–3 days Same — it's not about snow capacity
Depreciation Hit $20K–$30K instantly Already depreciated
Remaining Service
Life ~15 years (new) 10+ years (used municipal trucks)
Time to Deploy Wait for new build Likely immediate (from
auction/inventory)
Cost Flexibility Budget fully consumed ~$50K left for other needs (operator,
maintenance, etc.)
Feature / Factor City's Plan (New F-750) Practical Alternative (Used Hook-
Lift or Plow Rig)
Public Transparency
�� No breakdown of
alternatives, lifecycle use
��� More responsible if transparently
discussed
•
Concerns
Purchasing a nearly $200,000 new truck primarily for snow plowing in a city with minimal
snowfall usage seems a poor use of public resources. Used Class 6-7 trucks acquired from
municipal fleets typically offer:
• Proven reliability with low mileage from routine DOT inspections.
• A service life often extending beyond 10 years with proper maintenance.
• Flexibility to be refitted with varied attachments using the hook-lift, enabling year-round
utility.
• Significantly lower initial capital outlay, allowing funding for staffing or maintenance
reserves.
2–4 year old surplus municipal hook-lift trucks commonly sell between $85,000–$120,000 on
sites like GovDeals, Ritchie Bros, or surplus state auctions.
Often include plows or dump bodies; remaining life 10+ years for municipal use.
Savings vs. new: $40,000–$70,000.
Also questions,
• Are there fleet utilization reports justifying a new $160K snow-capable truck?
• ❌ How many snow-related calls went unanswered the past few years?
•
�� How many roads were impassable due to lack of equipment?
Recommendations
o Just explain how the truck will be used year-round.
If this is more than a snow plow, just tell the public what else it will do — dump
work, leaf pickup, road repair, etc.
Provide a cost-benefit analysis comparing new versus used options.
o Let us know what it’s replacing (if anything).
Are you swapping out an older truck? Retiring a fleet vehicle? If not, why now?
• Confirm that you explored used municipal options.
If the city considered surplus trucks and found them lacking, that’s fair — but that should
be explained.
If cost efficiency is the priority, the City should:
- Put the hook-lift/plow package out for competitive bid instead of single-source.
- Consider downsizing chassis/upfit specs for actual duty cycle.
- Explore regional/state surplus auctions for nearly new hook-lift + plow trucks.
- Evaluate whether two specialized trucks are more cost-effective and operationally
resilient than one all-purpose overbuilt unit.
Conclusion
In light of Bremerton’s limited snowfall and infrequent snow plowing requirements, the current
proposal merits additional justification especially regarding the year-round utility, lifecycle costs,
and budget impacts. Pursuing a used yet reliable municipal truck could yield significant savings
that support broader city priorities and operational flexibility.
Please advise how the City intends to address these concerns during the final decision-making
process. It came off as, “Don’t worry, I bought a brand-new fire truck to water my
houseplants. It was already in the budget.” We could buy a used, well-maintained
municipal truck for $85,000 or less — one that’s already plowed more snow than
we’ll see in five years — and still have $75,000 left for maintenance, a part-time
operator, or even a second vehicle. Why spend top dollar for something that’s mostly
going to sit? That’s not fiscal responsibility. That’s shiny-object syndrome.
Prepared by:
Jon Waters
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: 9/10/2025
Conservation Grant Agreement with Puget
Sound Energy for LED Retrofit Phase 6
COUNCIL MEETING Date: 9/17/2025
Department: Public Works
Presenter: Ron Moore
Phone: (360) 473-5333
SUMMARY:
In 2022 Puget Sound Energy (PSE) and the City of Bremerton entered into an agreement for PSE to
convert streetlights to LED lighting for the entire City. The project was broken into fifteen phases and
originally planned to take up to fifteen years to complete. Due to a change in the Tariff agreement
with PSE the costs have dramatically reduced.
This grant agreement is for Phase Six was completed in early 2025. The invoice from PSE for the
project in Phase Six was $2,331.26. The grant will pay $2,202.00 for a net cost to the City of $129.26
for 89 lights or a cost of $25.00 per light, which is much less than the assumed cost of $143/light.
Due to the reduced cost per light the payback timeline is reduced significantly as presented in the
attached program cost summary.
Phases seven, eight and nine are expected to be completed in late 2025.
ATTACHMENTS:
Street Lighting Conservation Grant Agreement #3 Project P_1577228
Project Map
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): City of Bremerton funded amount is $20,000 per
year from the REET funds that have been set aside for the project. Phase Six were completed for
$2331.26 and the grant will reimburse $2202.00.00 for a net cost of $129.26.
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☒ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve conservation grant from Puget Sound Energy and
authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and
conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 04/19/2024
4E
4386 4/13 rev 11/21/2017 Page 1 of 3
Customer Only Agreement
Customer Only Agreement
Conservation Program: Business Lighting
Agreement No.: 1
Project No.: P_1577228
CONSERVATION
GRANT AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT is made this ________ day of ______________________, 20________, by and between
PUGET SOUND ENERGY (“PSE”) and CITY OF BREMERTON (“Participant”).
RECITALS
A. Under PSE’s Electric Schedule 83 and Gas Schedule 183, as currently in effect and on file with the Washington Utilities
and Transportation Commission (collectively, “Tariffs”), PSE offers grants for certain conservation measures installed or
implemented at facilities that receive electric or natural gas service from PSE.
B. Participant intends to install or implement conservation measures and is requesting a grant from PSE.
AGREEMENTS
PSE and Participant agree as follows:
1. PROJECT PREMISES/METER LOCATION ADDRESS: BREMERTON PHASE 6 ST LIGHTS
BREMERTON WA 98310 - CITY OF BREMERTON PHASE 6 - POLE SERVICES (Please note: meter
location/address may differ from the site mailing address). Participant will install or implement the conservation
measures listed in paragraph 2 (“Conservation Measures”) at the above located facilities (the “Premises”). Participant
represents either (a) that it is the owner or otherwise has the lawful authority to make the statements herein on behalf
of the owner of the Premises, or (b) that it is the lawful tenant of the Premises and that it has obtained written
authorization from the owner of the Premises.
2. Conservation Measures. Participant represents that it will purchase equipment or materials or has entered or will
enter into an agreement with one or more contractors (the “Contractor”) for the purchase and installation or
implementation at the Premises of the Conservation Measures which may be detailed in Attachment C: Attachment
to Conservation Grant, at the following costs:
Conservation Measures Measure
Life Total Cost Eligible Grant
1. Lighting - Street - Custom 20 $2,202.00 $2,202.00
TOTAL (includes sales tax) $2,202.00 $2,202.00
Participant represents that the total cost of the Conservation Measures is the net amount of its obligation with respect
thereto.
3. Grant. Upon the execution by all parties and PSE’s receipt of this Conservation Grant Agreement within 90 days
of the agreement date, PSE agrees to grant the Participant, after installation by Participant and confirmation by PSE
of the Conservation Measures, an amount equal to the Eligible Conservation Grant (“the Grant”) set forth in
Attachment C.
26th August 25
4386 4/13 rev 11/21/2017 Page 2 of 3
Conservation Program: Business Lighting
Agreement No.: 1
Project No.: P_1577228
The parties agree that the Conservation Measures must be installed and the Grant paid within 12 months for
projects saving less than 100,000 kWh or 24 months for projects saving 100,000 kWh or more of the signing of
this Conservation Grant Agreement. Savings are shown on Attachment C-Lighting Installations.
If for any reason the installed cost of the Conservation Measures is less than the amount shown above and on
Attachment C-Lighting Installations, PSE may decrease pro rata the amount of the Grant. The Participant shall be
responsible for paying any amount in excess of the amount of the Grant.
4. Separate Contract. Participant acknowledges and agrees that PSE is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a party to
any purchase or installation contract relating to Conservation Measures, which shall be installed pursuant to a
contract between Participant and its Contractor(s). Participant expressly acknowledges that PSE’s involvement with
respect to any aspect of the Conservation Measures is limited to the furnishing of the Grant. PSE HAS NOT MADE
AND DOES NOT MAKE (AND PARTICIPANT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT PSE DOES NOT MAKE) ANY
IMPLIED OR EXPRESS WARRANTY (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS) REPRESENTATION, OR PROMISE WITH
RESPECT TO EITHER (A) THE CONSERVATION MEASURES, (B) ANY MATERIALS AND LABOR
REQUIRED FOR OR USED IN THE INSTALLATION OF THE CONSERVATION MEASURES, OR (C)
THE INSTALLATION OF THE CONSERVATION MEASURES.
5. Final Cost Documentation, Access & Inspection: Participant agrees to promptly provide PSE, upon request, and
for a period no shorter than the longest applicable measure life: (1) documentation verifying equipment purchased
and/or work performed in connection with the Conservation Measures installed; (2) reasonable access to and
inspection of the Facility and Conservation Measures installed therein before, during and/or after implementation;
and (3) reasonable access to, inspection and use of energy usage data related to the Conservation Measures
including release of utility bills and Facility energy consumption information following implementation.
6. Release. Participant releases PSE from any and all claims, losses, harm, costs, liabilities, damages and expenses
directly or indirectly resulting from or in connection with (a) the Conservation Measures, (b) any materials and
labor required for or used in the installation of the Conservation Measures, (c) the installation of the Conservation
Measures, or (d) the identification, handling and disposal of any associated hazardous waste materials.
7. Disclaimer. PSE conducts energy analyses at the request of its customers to determine the extent to which
conservation measures are cost–effective. Any estimate of energy savings made by PSE in connection with any
such analyses is solely for the purpose of determining the cost–effectiveness of the particular conservation
measures and not to be used for any other purpose. PSE has not and does not make any promise, warranty or
representation with respect to any savings in energy consumption from Conservation Measures.
8. Termination. In the event a Participant’s contribution to PSE’s recovery of energy efficiency program costs is
affected by all or a portion of Participant’s electric and/or gas delivery service being provided by a party other than
PSE, then Participant shall refund to PSE an amount equal to the ratio of the unused Measure Life of the
measure(s) to the total Measure Life of such Conservation Measure(s) multiplied by the dollar amount of the Grant
with respect to such Conservation Measure(s).
9. Incorporation of tariffs by reference. This Agreement and the Attachment To Conservation Grant are subject to
the terms of the Tariffs, incorporated herein by reference. Specific terms and conditions from one or more
conservation schedules from similar filed tariffs may also apply, as determined by PSE at its sole discretion, based
on various criteria. A complete list of conservation schedules is available at:
https://www.pse.com/-/media/Project/PSE/Portal/Rate-documents/Electric/elec_sch_250.pdf
10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and its attachments set forth the entire agreement between the parties and
supersede any and all prior agreements with respect to the Conservation Measures. No change, amendment or
modification of any provision of this Agreement shall be valid unless set forth in writing and signed by both
parties.
4386 4/13 rev 11/21/2017 Page 3 of 3
Conservation Program: Business Lighting
Agreement No.: 1
Project No.: P_1577228
PUGET SOUND ENERGY PARTICIPANT
CITY OF BREMERTON
By: By:
Name: Andrew Pultorak Print Name:
Title: Supv Energy Mgmt. Engineering Title:
Federal Tax I.D. No.:
6011 4/13 Page 1 of 2
Conservation Program: Business Lighting
Agreement No.: 1
Project No.: P_1577228
ATTACHMENT C
TO CONSERVATION GRANT
No
Conservation Measure(s) shall consist of the following:
This project shall implement the Business Standard Lighting project defined in the attached
“Grant Attachment C - Lighting Installations” of the PSE Business Lighting Incentive Program
Application.
At a minimum the project shall follow these specifications:
1) LED Fixtures and Lamps: All Fixtures and Lamps must be UL or ETL listed, have a Power
Factor 90% or greater, and have a Manufacturer’s Warranty of five years or greater. Data
shall be listed on the required manufacturer's specification sheet and the sheet shall
include the Total Input watts (LED module plus driver) of the fixture or lamp.
2) Advanced Controls (LLLC, NLC & AELC): All Advanced Controls are defined and shall meet
the requirements listed on the Terms page of the Lighting Application. All Advanced
controls shall be approved by PSE prior to installation.
The above specifications are solely for the purpose of defining energy-related components of Conservation Measure(s) for which
the Grant is offered. Puget Sound Energy is not responsible for ensuring the health, safety, comfort, or well-being of workers or
facility occupants or the suitability of equipment selected for the intended application. It is the responsibility of the grant
Participant and the Participant’s hired designers, contractors, consultants to ensure compliance of the Conservation Measure(s)
with Participant’s needs and all applicable codes and standards.
The following shall be submitted by Participant prior to Grant payment:
Completed Request for Taxpayer I.D. Number (“W-9”).
Copies of invoicing (no purchase orders, quotes, or estimates) for all expenses, including but not limited to equipment,
materials, and labor associated with installation of Conservation Measure(s).
Other (specify):
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
6011 4/13 Page 2 of 2
Conservation Program: Business Lighting
Agreement No.: 1
Project No.: P_1577228
ATTACHMENT C
TO CONSERVATION GRANT
No
Conservation Measure(s) shall be verified as follows prior to Grant payment:
PSE shall conduct the following as the verification process:
1) A final site visit may be conducted by a PSE Representative to verify as built fixture types
and quantities. PSE reserves the right to conduct onsite verifications for Projects with
25,000 kWh or less.
2) Projects may require additional back-up documentation as requested by PSE
Representative.
3) All Advanced Controls shall require an onsite verification after the controls are installed
and operational for at least 30 days.
If intended energy savings are not being achieved by Conservation Measure(s) because specified equipment efficiency
parameters or performance parameters defined above are not used, Participant shall be required to correct such deficiencies
prior to Grant payment. Failure to comply with specified equipment efficiency or performance parameters may result in
forfeiture or reduction of Grant payment.
Estimated PSE IncentivePole Services Installation ChargeRate ScheduleProject Info Fixture CountsProject Name (REQ)Total Existing 89City/Company (REQ)Existing fixturePSE Account # (REQ)Total New 89Contact, first and last (REQ)New fixtureAddress (REQ)Email (REQ)Fixture savingsCity (REQ)Phone (REQ)Control savings State WAZip (REQ)98337Tax IDTOTAL SAVINGS Pole Services W/O #Billing Street AddressLighting Fixture / LampControls Total Savings and CostSavedkWhExist67120 8.04 33,768 67 0% 0 33,768New67 $25 37 2.48 10,412 67$0 27%2,811 7,601Exist18120 2.16 9,072 18 0% 0 9,072New18 $25 39 0.70 2,948 18$0 27%796 2,152Exist1120 0.12 504 1 0% 0 504New1 $25 71 0.07 298 1$0 27%81 218Exist3245 0.74 3,087 3 0% 0 3,087New3 $25 98 0.29 1,235 3$0 27%333 901Exist1800.00018 0%00New180.00 018$0 0%00Exist700.00070%00New70.00 07$0 0%00Exist100.00010%00New10.00 01$0 0%00Exist00.00000%00New0.00 00$0 0%00Exist00.00000%00New0.00 00$0 0%00Exist00.00000%00New0.00 00$0 0%00Exist00.00000%00New0.00 00$0 0%00Exist00.00000%00New0.00 00$0 0%00Exist00.00000%00New0.00 00$0 0%00BUSINESS LIGHTING INCENTIVE PROGRAM$2,202Application expires in 132 daysCity of Bremerton Phase 6 - Pole ServicesCity of BremertonPole Services ඤ Street LighƟng V25-01 - Valid through 12/31/2025kWhkWϮϮϬͲϬϯϵͲϬϮϳͲϮϲϳNick AtaieStreet Lighting$2,202Sch 5xCustomer / Payee InfoPSE Pole Services Projects ONLY31,5387.5146,43111.06various locations360-473-230614,8933.55BremertonNick.Ataie@ci.bremerton.wa.us4,021NotesLocation Qty Lamp / FixtureDescriptionCost EachQty ControlCostEachYour saveWatts kW kWhCost kWhFinal kWh35,559(10) 115-9558345 6th ST STE 1001VariousCompleteHigh Pressure SodiumPole Services Street LightAdvanced Exterior ControlHPS 100WExterior Photo Control26,167 $1,6582VariousCompletePole ServicesStreet LightAdvanced Exterior ControlHigh Pressure Sodium HPS 100WExterior Photo Control6,920 $446Pole ServicesStreet LightAdvanced Exterior ControlHigh Pressure Sodium HPS 100WExterior Photo Control286$254variousComplete3variousCompletePole ServicesStreet LightAdvanced Exterior ControlHigh Pressure Sodium HPS 200WExterior Photo Control2,186 $74Pole ServicesExterior Photo ControlExterior Photo Control0$06Missing Info5Missing InfoPole ServicesExterior Photo ControlExterior Photo Control0$0Pole ServicesExterior Photo ControlExterior Photo Control0$08Missing Info7Missing InfoPole ServicesExterior Photo ControlExterior Photo Control0$0Pole ServicesExterior Photo ControlExterior Photo Control0$010Missing Info9Missing InfoPole ServicesExterior Photo ControlExterior Photo Control0$011Missing InfoExterior Photo ControlPole ServicesExterior Photo Control120$0Missing InfoExterior Photo Control0$0Pole ServicesExterior Photo ControlPole ServicesExterior Photo ControlExterior Photo Control0$013Missing InfoPuget Sound EnergyPage 18/21/2025P1577228 | Grant Number: 1
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NR Can, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (H ong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), N GCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Bremerton
Phase
!(3 (94)
!(4 (99)
!(5 (98)
!(6 (97)
!(7 (83)
!(8 (100)
!(9 (94)
!(10 (100)
!(11 (100)
!(12 (100)
!(13 (100)
!(14 (97)
!(15 (94)
PH ASE 3
PH ASE 4
PH ASE 5
PH ASE 8
PH ASE 7
PH ASE 6
PH ASE 9
PH ASE 10
PH ASE 11
PH ASE 12
PH ASE 13
PH ASE 14
PH ASE 15
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: 9/10/25
Contract Modification Agreement No. 7 with
Parametrix, Inc. for Engineering Services
for the Kitsap Lake Park Renovation Project
COUNCIL MEETING Date: 9/17/25
Department: Parks & Recreation
Presenter: T. Baker
Phone: (360) 473-5429
SUMMARY: The proposed Contract Modification No. 7 is for $20,735.08, which brings the total
contract amount to $256,610.69. The added scope of work includes engineering services for an
extended 5 months of work, engineering services during construction beyond the previous scope,
redesign of the drainage system by boat launch, and irrigation design.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Exhibit A: Scope of Work; 2) Contract Change Order No. 7; 3) Power Point
Presentation
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The change order is within the approved $1.6M
project budget.
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☒ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve Contract Modification No. 7 with Parametrix, Inc, and authorize the Mayor to finalize
and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 04/19/2024
4F
Scope of Work
60 Washington Avenue, Suite 390 • Bremerton, WA 98337 | 360.377.0014 | Parametrix.com
Exhibit A
City of Bremerton
Kitsap Lake Park Renovation Project
Change Order 7 – Additional Engineering Services During Construction
Introduction
This document describes Parametrix’s proposed scope of work (SOW) for Change Order 7 under our
existing contract. The purpose of Change Order 7 is to request budget for the following services:
1. Project Management and Meetings for extended 5 additional months of work.
2. Engineering services during construction beyond previous scope.
3. Redesign of drainage system by boat launch.
4. Irrigation Design.
A proposed schedule is included in this scope as Exhibit B and our proposed budget is attached as
Exhibit C.
Task 1 – Project Management and Meetings
Objective
Continue project management through the substantial completion of the project.
Activities
The following activities will be performed as part of this task:
Manage and direct the project technical team.
Provide routine project management and communications (scope, schedule, budget, and
invoicing).
Prepare monthly progress reports and progress billings and submit to the City for approval
and payment.
Deliverables
The following deliverables are associated with this task:
Routine correspondence and monthly invoices and progress reports
Meeting agendas and notes.
Assumptions
The following assumptions apply to this task:
Project duration is expected to take an additional 5 months beyond the previous estimate
because of the extended construction schedule.
Scope of Work
City of Bremerton 233-1896-174
Kitsap Lake Park Renovation Project 2 August 2025
Change Order 7 – Additional Engineering Services
and Irrigation Design
Task 6 – Engineering Services During Construction
Objective
The following objectives apply to this task:
Receive compensation for previously performed engineering services during construction
completed beyond previous scope.
Receive compensation for the previously performed design of the trench drain.
Provide additional engineering support during the construction phase of the project.
Activities
The following activities have been previously performed as part of this task:
Attended construction meetings as requested.
Responded to applicable Contractor’s Requests for Information (RFIs) and requests for
change orders and make recommendations to the City.
Attended site walks at the request of the City.
Designed trench drain for parking lot.
Revised design documents in response to changes encountered during the construction.
The following activities will be performed as part of this task:
Attend construction meetings as requested.
Review Contractor’s submittals for compliance with the design.
Respond to applicable Contractor’s Requests for Information (RFIs) and requests for change
orders and make recommendations to the City.
Attend site walks at the request of the City.
Revise design documents in response to changes encountered during the construction.
Deliverables
The following activities will be performed as part of this task:
Electronic copies of responses to material submittals, cut sheets, shop drawings review, RFI
responses, and revised design documents.
Assumptions
The following assumptions apply to this task:
Parametrix previously provided the design of the trench drain in the main parking lot.
Parametrix will review and respond to RFIs at an estimated 2 hours each. It is assumed that
a total of no more than 2 additional RFIs will be reviewed (4 hours).
The Parametrix PM and/or one lead staff will attend up to 3 online meetings at 1 hour each
and 2 site meetings at 2 hours each (7 hours).
Scope of Work
City of Bremerton 233-1896-174
Kitsap Lake Park Renovation Project 3 August 2025
Change Order 7 – Additional Engineering Services
and Irrigation Design
Hours for support are 65 hours for the Parametrix PM, 1 hours for the project engineer for a
total of 66 technical staff hours.
Task 7 – Irrigation Design
Objective
The following objectives apply to this task:
Provide irrigation design plan and details for construction.
Activities
The following activities will be performed as part of this task:
Coordinate with City Parks staff about irrigation design.
Develop and provide design documents for irrigation design.
Provide bid support to City Parks staff during irrigation contractor selection.
Deliverables
The following activities will be performed as part of this task:
Electronic copies of irrigation plan sheet Draft and Final design documents.
Assumptions
The following assumptions apply to this task:
Parametrix will provide irrigation plan (1) and detail (1) sheets.
Limits irrigation design are shown in Exhibit D.
The City will provide a point of connection location and available pressure/flow rate from
municipal potable water source.
The City shall provide at most one (1) round of consolidated comments prior to finalization of
the Irrigation Plans.
WSDOT Standard Specifications (2025 edition) shall be used. No Special Provisions are to be
prepared.
Parametrix will not provide engineering services during construction in this scope.
Exhibit B - Schedule
Work Element Completed By
Notice to Proceed August 22, 2025
Construction Complete October 1, 2025
Exhibit C
Client: City of Bremerton
Project:Kitsap Lake Park Improvements
Project No:233-1896-174
Robert Golembiewski IIJason CeraldeDarren SandenoMarcus VasseyKyle HaleJean Johnson3.0 Project CoordinatorProject ManagerSr. PlannerEngineer IVProject AccountantSr. Contracts Specialist$99.36 $153.51 $252.24 $178.71 $106.47 $187.17
Task Description Labor Dollars Labor Hours
01.A Project Management and Meetings $3,006.71 23 8 11 0 0 4 1
COMPLETED Project Management and Coordination $1,280.99 10 4.75 4.75 0.75
NEW Virtual Project Meetings (3)$460.53 3 3
NEW Project Management and Coordination (3 mo.) including scoping CO7 $1,265.19 10 3 3 3 1
01.B Project Management and Meetings $729.17 5 0 5 0 0 0 0
COMPLETED Project Management and Coordination $729.17 5 4.75
06.A Schedule A Eng Services During Construction $38.38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
COMPLETED RFI Response (1)$38.38 0 0.25
06.B Schedule B Eng Services During Construction $11,768.72 77 0 76 0 1 0 0
COMPLETED Construction Meetings including stormwater issues $2,225.90 15 14.5
COMPLETED Trench Drain Design Concepts $7,854.21 51 50 1
NEW Construction Meetings (3)$460.53 3 3
NEW Site Visits (2)$614.04 4 4
NEW Respond to RFIs (2)$614.04 4 4
07 Irrigation Design $5,921.28 28 0 32 4 0 0 0
NEW Irrigation Design Plans (1 plan, 1 detail sheet)$4,693.20 28 24 4
NEW Irrigation Design coordination $614.04 4 4
NEW Irrigation Design bid support $614.04 4 4
Labor Totals:128 8 119 0 1 4 1
Totals:$20,735.08 $770.04 $18,190.94 $0.00 $178.71 $399.26 $187.17
Other Direct Expenses
Mileage - $0.625/mile $0.00
Other Direct Expenses Total:$0.00
Project Total $20,735.08
Billing Rates:
8/5/2025 ExhibitC_Cost Est_080525.xlsx
PR
I
C
E
RO
A
D
NW
KITSAP LAKE
17518017617717817918
0
181
182
183 MOTORCYCLEPARKING ONLYMOTORCYCLEPARKING ONLY166167168168168169171172173174170
N 212055.70E 1179386.72N 211934.01E 1179368.41N 212038.59E 1179393.52N 211913.64E 1179357.05N 211959.44E 1179372.22N 211958.27E 1179399.37N 211963.41E 1179410.91N 211995.28E 1179424.27N 212014.13E 1179418.92N 212018.47E 1179401.52N 212073.79E 1179375.31N 212067.79E 1179409.71N 212053.43E 1179404.23N 212069.86E 1179474.95N 212050.06E 1179470.06N 212076.30E 1179460.78N 212098.33E 1179474.24N 212114.00E 1179479.73N 212136.97E 1179477.60N 212143.12E 1179494.40N 212151.95E 1179499.48N 212159.60E 1179500.74N 212175.72E 1179514.58N 212187.32E 1179517.80N 212195.44E 1179516.29N 212207.23E 1179507.30N 212210.11E 1179492.36N 212205.84E 1179472.28N 212209.94E 1179455.64N 212209.87E 1179445.99N 212197.86E 1179436.67N 212189.25E 1179433.97N 212144.29E 1179374.16N 212153.44E 1179359.56N 212118.80E 1179338.18N 212109.70E 1179352.72N 212099.44E 1179349.22N 212098.08E 1179336.50N 212096.78E 1179319.09N 212099.25E 1179292.33N 212091.43E 1179280.89N 212032.70E 1179282.46N 212081.60E 1179242.95N 212083.82E 1179249.61N 212032.37E 1179245.02N 212029.43E 1179247.68N 212023.40E 1179265.94N 212063.69E 1179232.31N 212068.20E 1179221.38N 212058.50E 1179214.31N 212052.76E 1179222.10N 212035.27E 1179215.19N 212044.89E 1179203.04N 212032.24E 1179193.56N 212020.40E 1179208.86N 212008.70E 1179199.75N 212006.37E 1179175.00N 211985.08E 1179130.39N 211969.43E 1179113.23N 212063.19E 1179309.89N 212062.35E 1179317.96N 212058.10E 1179302.24N 211995.92E 1179225.94N 211996.75E 1179234.79N 211921.04E 1179335.03N 212161.64E 1179421.35N 212145.90E 1179441.60N 212102.88E 1179438.45N 212086.92E 1179403.71N 212089.21E 1179371.00N 212101.60E 1179363.63N 212136.33E 1179383.38N 212062.76E 1179228.76N 212051.23E 1179279.27N 212058.56E 1179381.71N 212088.03E 1179325.76N 212027.78E 1179290.49N 212048.71E 1179305.50N 212054.14E 1179321.72N 212042.51E 1179320.71N 212043.08E 1179314.86N 212075.51E 1179260.88N 212050.27E 1179241.00OFSHEETVERT.HORIZ.SCALECITY OF BREMERTONREVISIONSDEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATIONIF NOT SCALE ACCORDINGLYTWO INCHES AT FULL SCALE1"02"PN:DWG NO.REMERTONBC I T Y O FKITSAP LAKE PARK IMPROVEMENTSXXXX
23Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCONFORMED SETLANDSCAPE PLANLS123PLANSCALE IN FEET02040TILL 3" FINE COMPOST INTO TOP 6" OFUNDERLYING SOIL AND HYDROSEED(SEE LANDSCAPING NOTE 2)LANDSCAPING LEGEND:LANDSCAPING NOTES:1.LANDSCAPE LIMITS SHOWN CORRESPONDTO CLEARING AND GRUBBING LIMITS,SHOWN ON SHEET DM1.2.IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS BY OTHERS.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITHDESIGNER/INSTALLER PRIOR TOHYDROSEEDING.PLAY AREASHELTERUPPERPARKINGLOTLOWER PARKING LOTBOAT RAMPFISHING PIERKITSAP LAKE68/8/24
CITY OF BREMERTON
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO: 07
PROJECT NAME: KITSAP LAKE PARK RENOVATION PROJECT
PROJECT NO: 59163 CONTRACTOR: PARAMETRIX, INC.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT: 113,889.00 DAYS: March 2021
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
CHANGES:
121,986.61 DAYS: 0
THIS CHANGE: 20,735.08 DAYS: August 2025
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT: 256,610.69 DAYS: August 2025
This Change Order covers changes to the subject contract as described herein. The Contractor shall
construct, furnish equipment and materials, and perform all work as necessary or required to complete
the Change Order Items. The increase or decrease in c ontract price shown below includes any
applicable taxes.
Rule 170 Rule 171 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES INCREASE IN
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
($)
(DECREASE) IN
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
($)
CONTRACT
TIME
EXTENSION
(DAYS:)
X
Contract Modification No. 7
Added SOW to include:
1. Project management and meetings for extended 5
months of work.
2. Engineering services during construction beyond
previous scope.
3. Redesign of drainage system by boat launch.
4. Irrigation design.
20,735.08
0.00
August 2025
NET CHANGE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT
INCREASE OR (DECREASE)
20,735.08
0.00 0
ESTIMATED SALES TAX AT 9.0% 0.00 0.00
TOTAL INCLUDING SALES TAX 20,735.08
0.00 0
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO: _07_
PROJECT NAME: KITSAP LAKE PARK RENOVATION PROJECT
Page 2 of 2
Change Order
Rev. 06/2018
Contractor acknowledges and accepts that this Change Order constitutes final settlement of all claims
of any kind or nature arising from or connected with any work either covered or affected by this Change
Order, including, without limitation, claims related to contract time, on -site or home office overhead, or
lost profits. Nothing in this Change Order shall limit the City’s right to bring a claim for past performance.
The undersigned Contractor approves the foregoing Change Order as to the changes, if any, in the
contract price specified for each item, including any and all supervision costs and other m iscellaneous
costs relating to the change in work, and as to the extension of time allowed, if any, for completion of
the entire work due to said Change Order.
This document will become a supplement of the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. I t is
understood that this Change Order shall be effective when approved by the City of Bremerton.
The parties whose names appear below warrant that they are authorized to enter into a change order
that is binding on the parties of this co ntract. In addition, Contractor warrants that it has or will inform
the surety of this change, and shall take appropriate action to modify any bonds required under the
contract to address this change.
CONTRACTOR
Approved: DATE:
PROJECT MANAGER
Recommended: DATE:
CITY ENGINEER
Council action is required as project cost will exceed approved budget. Yes No
Council action is required as change exceeds Mayors authority per BMC 2.76.110. Yes No
Recommended: DATE:
DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Recommended: DATE:
MAYOR
Approved: DATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
___
KYLIE J. FINNELL, Bremerton City Attorney ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk
Kitsap Lake Park Project
Change Order
Contract Modification No. 7 with Parametrix, Inc.
for Engineering Services for the Kitsap Lake Park
Renovation Project
City Council previously approved an overall project budget of $1.6 million,
this change order will not increase the total project cost
The change order is being supported by staff due to the long-term benefit to
amending the stormwater design and the consultant’s knowledge of the site
related to the irrigation design work, which was a planned contract
The slopes of the parking lot across the asphalt were very difficult to plan
proper drainage to start
The original design for stormwater after install, did not move all water to
where it needed to go, the revised design did, however, it has created
issues/concerns with the boat launch area for users
Met onsite with contractors, users and city staff to discuss concerns and
potential solutions
The original design was no fault of Parametrix or the install by Redside or
their subcontractors
Let's fix the issue now instead of going back later
Kitsap Lake Park Project –Change Order
Kitsap Lake Park Project –Concept Plan
Kitsap Lake
Future
Parking for
“Kitsap Lake to
West Belfair Trail”
(N.I.C.)
Future Wildlife Viewing
Platforms & Nature Trails
(N.I.C.)
Improved Water Access via
Ramp, Seating,
Accessible Pathways/Parking
& Restroom Upgrades
Wetland
Viewpoint & Signage
(N.I.C.)
New
Shelter Accessible
Pathways &
Parking
Future
Play Area
& Seating
(N.I.C.)
Entry Signage &
Landscaping
(N.I.C.)
Stormwater Vault
Treatment System
& Trench Drain
New
Accessible
Fishing
Dock
New Accessible
Boat Launch
Accessible Boat Launch
Parking
N.I.C.: Not in Contract
Kitsap Lake Park Project –Stormwater Design
Kitsap Lake Park Project –Gutter Concern
Kitsap Lake Park Project –Preferred Design
Kitsap Lake Park Project –Irrigation Design Area
The proposed Contract Modification No. 7 is for $20,735.08, which brings the total
contract amount to $256,610.69. The added scope of work includes engineering
services for an extended 5 months of work, engineering services during construction
beyond the previous scope, redesign of the stormwater system by the boat launch,
and irrigation design
Staff recommends that council approve Contract Modification No. 7 with Parametrix,
Inc, and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially
the same terms and conditions as presented.
Kitsap Lake Park Project –Change Order
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: 09/10/2025
Resolution No. 3404 to Modify Parking on a
portion of Almira Avenue from head-in to
back-in angle parking
COUNCIL MEETING Date: 09/17/2025
Department: PW&U-Engineering
Presenter: Nick Ataie
Phone: (360) 473-2306
SUMMARY:
The 2025 – 2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes multimodal transportation improvements
under the View Ridge Elementary – Safe Routes to School (Phase 1) Project. A portion of the project
includes a reconstruction of Almira Drive between Sylvan Way and Ivy Road including a
reconfiguration of the roadway to accommodate active transportation improvements. During design
of this project, Engineering staff evaluated reconstruction options of existing head-in street parking
on the 3400 block of Almira Drive and has recommended conversion to back-in angle parking. The
Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) and Washington Administrative Code (WAC) requires a resolution
of the City Council for back-in angle parking upon completion of an engineering study. With approval
of this resolution, conversion of this parking would occur with project construction currently estimated
in 2026.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Parking Location Map
2. Engineering Memo
3. Resolution
4. Power Point Presentation
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
None
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☒ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Resolution No. 3404 to modify parking on a portion of Almira Drive from head-in to
back-in angle parking.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 04/19/2024
4G
RESOLUTION NO. _____________________
MODIFICATION OF PARKING ON A PORTION OF ALMIRA DRIVE
FROM HEAD-IN TO BACK-IN ANGLE
PARKING AREA
LEGEND
3422 Almira Dr
3430a Almira Dr
View Ridge Elementary – Almira Drive Safe Routes to School
City Project No. 315055
State Project HLP-SR22(004)
Back-In Angle Parking Memorandum (Near 3422Almira Drive)
Prepared By:
Nick Ataie, P.E. – Project Manager
City of Bremerton Public Works & Utilities – Engineering Division
June 2025
Nick Ataie
Digitally signed by Nick AtaieUser: Nick.AtaieCity of Bremerton - PW&U Engineering Divisionnick.ataie@ci.bremerton.wa.us
Date: 06/05/2025
Time: 9:16:53 AMFile: View Ridge SRTS - Almira Back In ParkingMemo.pdf
Page 2
PROJECT OVERVIEW
The View Ridge Elementary – Almira Drive Safe Routes to School Project includes planned
pedestrian and bicycle improvements serving areas north of View Ridge Elementary School
including Spruce Avenue, East 33rd Street, Sylvan Way, and Almira Drive. The general
project location is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 – Project Location Map
The scope of work includes construction of a 10’ – 11’ shared-use path or sidepath from the
school to the northern terminus of the project at Ivy Road via Spruce Avenue, East 33rd
Street, an unnamed alleyway serving the 3300 block of Almira Drive, and Almira Drive. The
Page 3
project also includes sidewalk and curb ramp improvements along Spruce Avenue, Sylvan
Way, and Almira Drive. Along Almira Drive, the proposed typical section is depicted in
Figure 2 and includes a 21’ roadway (2 – 10.5’ travel lanes), a 6’ sidewalk on the west side
of the roadway, and a 11’ shared-use sidepath on the east side of the roadway.
Figure 2 – Almira Drive Proposed Typical Section
EXISTING HEAD-IN STREET PARKING OVERVIEW
Almira Drive is a non-classified 2-lane local roadway serving approximately 2,000 vehicles
per day. The project limits includes portions of on-street parking along the east side of
Almira Drive between Sylvan Way and Nome Drive. The majority of designated parking is
parallel with the exception of approximately 20 head-in parking spaces located near
apartment buildings at 3422 and 3430 Almira Drive as shown in Figure 3. This parking
configuration was included in the View Crest Gardens 1965 plat which included
development of the adjacent housing development. The parking area is encompassed fully
within the existing Almira Drive right-of-way and is considered a City street parking facility
as defined in BMC 10.10 (Parking Code). The dimensions of the existing head-in parking
spaces are approximately 7’ wide by 14’ long. There are no designated accessible parking
stalls.
Figure 3 – Existing Head-In Parking (Almira Drive)
Page 4
Per BMC Figure 20.48(a), Parking Minimum Design Requirements, 0 degree parking shall
have a minimum stall width of 8’ and a minimum length of 22’. The existing parking stall
dimensions as previously noted are non-conforming.
Due to the proposed improvements reducing the width of traveled vehicle way on Almira
Drive in conjunction with incorporating a separated shared-use sidepath within the existing
right-of-way, a reconstruction of the existing head-in parking area is required.
PARKING RECONSTRUCTION DESIGN EVALUATION
The following parking area reconstruction options were evaluated.
OPTION 1 – RECONSTRUCT HEAD-IN PARKING
Due to the proposed geometric changes to Almira Drive previously discussed, re-
incorporation of head-in parking meeting the minimum parking stall dimension
requirements of BMC Figure 20.48(a) was determined to not be feasible without acquiring
additional right-of-way. Due to the existing developed nature of the property frontage at this
location, acquisition of additional right-of-way was identified as non-viable.
OPTION 2 – PARALLEL PARKING
On-Street parallel parking typically consists of 18’-20’ long by 7.5’ – 8’ wide parking stalls.
While this configuration was determined to be feasible, it results in the fewest number of
proposed parking stalls of all viable options (8).
OPTION 3 – 45 DEGREE ANGLE PARKING
45 degree angle parking was determined to provide adequate minimum parking space
depth based on available right-of-way for improvements. BMC Figure 20.48(a) establishes a
minimum parking stall depth of 17’-4” for 45 degree angle head-in parking and a minimum
stall width of 8’-6”. This option was determined to be feasible, and includes the following
considerations:
· Reduces the number of parking stalls to 10 including an accessible parking space
and not including a painted area which would accommodate motorcycle parking.
· Easier pull-in maneuver than back-in angle parking or parallel parking.
· More di@icult pull-out maneuver than back-in angle parking or parallel parking.
· Requires similar backing movement onto Almira Drive as head-in parking.
· Backing movement view obstruction possible for oncoming tra@ic.
· Parked vehicle loading/unloading from the rear of the vehicle requires standing near
or at edge of travel lanes.
Page 5
· Rear passenger doors encourage exiting vehicle behind vehicle and not towards the
sidewalk.
OPTION 4 – BACK IN 45 DEGREE ANGLE PARKING
45 degree back-in angle parking was determined to provide adequate minimum parking
space depth based on available right-of-way for improvements. BMC Figure 20.48(a)
establishes a minimum parking stall depth of 17’-4” for 45 degree angle head-in parking
and a minimum stall width of 8’-6” but does not speak to back-in angle parking. The FHWA
On-Street Motor Vehicle and the Bikeway Selection Guide (February 2021) recommends a
minimum 19.8’ parking stall depth for 45 degree back-in angle parking. Input from the
project design engineer (SCJ Alliance) recommends utilizing wider 10’ wide parking stalls
and an 18’ parking stall depth. This option was determined to be feasible, and includes the
following considerations:
· Reduces the number of parking stalls to 10 including an accessible parking space
and not including a painted area which would accommodate motorcycle parking.
· More di@icult back-in maneuver than regular pull-in angle parking.
· Easier pull-out maneuver than regular pull-in angle parking. Eliminates the di@iculty
drivers have of backing into moving tra@ic.
· Drivers have a better view of tra@ic when exiting the parking space into the travel
lane.
· Puts the truck or back of vehicle to the sidewalk for safer loading/unloading.
· Positions drivers and passengers, particularly children, to enter or exit the vehicle
towards the sidewalk with the doors shielding people from moving tra@ic.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATION
Of the four (4) parking design options considered, the alternatives deemed viable include
parallel parking, 45 degree angle parking, and 45 degree back in angle parking. Back-in
angle parking was determined as the recommended design option due to providing the
maximum number of parking stalls and providing safer operations which is in alignment
with the project goals. A similar back-in angle parking design is currently provided on Lebo
Boulevard which is also a multimodal street consisting of enhanced bicycle and pedestrian
facilities.
APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS
RCW 46.61.575 states that local authorities may by ordinance or resolution permit angle
parking on a roadway. WAC 308-330-270 states that a local authority may, by resolution,
declare upon what highways angle parking shall be permitted after engineering and tra@ic
Page 6
investigation. Based on the requirements of the RCW and WAC, a resolution of the
Bremerton City Council is required for designation of the recommended angle parking on
Almira Drive.
Page 7
PROPOSED BACK-IN ANGLE PARKING EXHIBIT
SIGN LEGENDE-LINE(ALMIRA DR)E-LINE(ALMIRA DR)F-LINE(SPRUCE AVE)PAVEMENT MARKING LEGEND8730 TALLON LANE NE, SUITE 200, LACEY, WA 98516P: 360.352.1465SCJALLIANCE.COMSENNIOALF EP R ON D57696IGERSERETSSTATEOFWASHIGINEERG T O N
SAMUEL A ROWSW E L LKEY MAPREMERTONBC I T Y O FOFSHEETCHECKED BY:DESIGN BY:DRAWN BY:BYDATENO.CITY OF BREMERTONDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIESENGINEERING DIVISION315055DWGDATE:WA P.E.#DATE:REVISIONSSECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE:GRANT/LOAN INFORMATIONDATE:WA P.E.#VIEW RIDGE ELEMENTARYALMIRA DRIVE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PHASE 1S01, T24N, R01E, W.M114PN:PRELIM4/18/20254/18/20254/18/2025SEE THIS SHEETMATCH LINE 505+00MATCH LINE 500+75SEE SHEET PM-04SEE SHEET PM-06MATCH LINE 510+00MATCH LINE 505+00SEE THIS SHEETSCALE IN FEET02040S ROWSWELL57696S DUNNA KNIGHT52136PM-05CHANNELIZATION AND SIGNING PLAN105STOPSPRUCEAVEALMIRADRBACK-INPARKINGONLYNOPARKINGNOPARKINGSTOPNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGHERE TOCORNERSTOPALMIRADRNOMEDRBACK-INPARKINGONLYNOPARKINGNOPARKINGSTOPSPRUCEAVEALMIRADRNOPARKINGSTOPSTOPALMIRADRNOMEDRNOPARKINGNOPARKINGFIRELANENOPARKINGFIRELANES SAWYER35872MOTORCYCLE PARKINGAREA12345678910ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, to modify parking on a portion of Almira
Drive from head-in to back-in angle parking
WHEREAS, the View Ridge Elementary – Almira Drive Safe Routes to School
transportation capital project includes roadway improvements focused on improving safety and
mobility for children by enabling and encouraging them to walk and bicycle to school, and
WHEREAS, the View Ridge Elementary – Almira Drive Safe Routes to School
transportation capital project includes a roadway reconfiguration and reconstruction of Almira
Drive impacting existing head-in parking near 3422 Almira Drive, and
WHEREAS, back-in angle parking has been identified as safer for road and
parking users while also reducing the roadway width for traffic calming and slower vehicle
speeds, and
WHEREAS, BMC 10 04 010 adopts the Model Traffic Ordinance as set out in the
Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Chapter 308-330, and
WHEREAS, in order to permit angle parking on a city street, WAC 308-330-
270(4) requires a resolution by the City after the City’s Traffic Engineer has conducted an
engineering and traffic investigation, and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic
investigation regarding modifying a portion of Almira Drive near 3422 Almira Drive to include
back-in angle parking, and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that modifying a portion of Almira Drive near
3422 Almira Drive to be back-in angle parking creates a safer street and parking operation;
NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Back-in angle parking on Almira Drive near 3422 Almira Drive
shall be created as determined by the City Engineer and consistent with the City Engineer’s
engineering and traffic investigation
SECTION 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this _____
day of __________________, 20____.
ERIC YOUNGER,
Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
KYLIE J. FINNELL, City Attorney ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk
3404
VIEW RIDGE ELEMENTARY
Safe Routes to School (Phase 1)
City Council Study Session
September 10, 2025
Nick Ataie, P.E. – PW&U Engineering Division
Resolution to Modify Parking on Almira Drive
Agenda Bill Schedule
Public Works Committee (08/18/25)
City Council (09/17/25)
Almira Drive
PARKING MODIFICATION LOCATION
Existing Head-In Parking, Almira Drive Right-of-Way
(Approximately 200 Feet North of Sylvan Way)
ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Reconstruct Head-In Parking
Proposed Multimodal Roadway Section (Almira Drive)
Not Viable – Insufficient Right-of-Way
Not Recommended – Safety & Operations
Change to Parallel Parking
Feasible – Highest Parking Reduction
Change to Head-In Angle Parking
Feasible – Moderate Parking Reduction
Not Preferred – Safety & Operations
Change to Back-In Angle Parking
Feasible – Moderate Parking Reduction
Preferred – Safety & Operations
Back-In Angle Parking
Presented at May 2024
Project Public Meeting
PROPOSED DESIGN
•Provides 10 Back-In Angle Parking Spaces
•Provides Motorcycle Parking Area
•Provide New Accessible Parking Space
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUIRED
•BMC Adoption of WAC Model Traffic Ordinance
Chapter 308-330 (BMC 10 04 010)
•WAC 308-330-270(4) requires the following to permit
angle parking on a City street:
•Engineering & Traffic Investigation
•City Council Resolution
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: 09/10/2025
Local Programs State Funding Agreement
with WSDOT for the 6th Street Active
Transportation Project
COUNCIL MEETING Date: 09/17/2025
Department: PW&U-Engineering
Presenter: Nick Ataie
Phone: (360) 473-2306
SUMMARY:
The 2025 – 2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes programmed funding for active
transportation improvements along 6th Street including a portion of Kitsap Way east of 11th Street.
The project scope of work consists of a roadway re-channelization to incorporate on-street bike lanes
and improve safety for all users. In 2024, the City submitted a funding request through the WSDOT
Pedestrian & Bicycle grant program for right-of-way and construction phases of the project. The City
was notified by WSDOT in early 2025 that the project was selected to receive $3.16 million in funding
through the Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Program. The grant funding would only be allocated to right-
of-way and construction phases as preliminary engineering is locally funded. The grant does not
require any matching local funds. The offered grant will be in WSDOT Standard Forms, with their
standard terms and conditions.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. WSDOT Award Letter
2. Project Location Map
3. WSDOT State Funding Agreement (Blank)
4. Power Point Presentation
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
This project is included in the 2025 – 2030 CIP including the $3.16 million WSDOT grant.
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☒ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Grant Agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation; and
authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and
conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 04/19/2024
4H
July 15, 2025
Mr. Chance Berthiaume
Interim Public Works Director
City of Bremerton
100 Oyster Bay Avenue N
Bremerton, WA 98312
RE: 6th Street Active Transportation Improvements
2025-27 Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Program
State Funding
Dear Mr. Berthiaume:
WSDOT is pleased to advise you that the above-mentioned project was selected to receive
funding through the Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety program. The state funding is limited as shown
below:
6th Street Active Transportation Improvements $3,160,000
Scope: See attached project summary.
A Local Programs State Funding Agreement or Supplement must be authorized before the
start of each state funded phase of the project. This includes authorization of the
construction phase prior to advertisement of the construction contract.
To meet the state requirements for this project, the following are required:
Please refer to the Local Programs webpage for detailed authorization information,
including: (http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/localprograms/)
Local Agency Guidelines (LAG) manual for detailed requirements.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP) amendments, as applicable.
Funding and billing forms.
Local Project Report is required to be completed by the end of June and
December each year. To access the database, you will need an account name and
password. Your account name is and your password is .
The password is case sensitive.
Project expenditures incurred before receiving notice from Local Programs of state
fund authorization are not eligible for reimbursement.
Mr. Chance Berthiaume
City of Bremerton
July 15, 2025
As a reminder, Local Programs encourages all agencies to submit monthly progress billings to
ensure timely reimbursement of eligible expenditures.
For questions or assistance, please contact your Region Local Programs Engineer, John Ho at
564.669.1018 or John.Ho@wsdot.wa.gov.
Sincerely,
Jay Drye, PE
Director
Local Programs
JD:st:cdm
Attachment
cc: Ned Lever, PE, Bremerton City Engineer
Shane Weber, PE, PTOE, Managing Engineer Transportation Capital, City of Bremerton
Isabel Servedio, Project Assistant, City of Bremerton
Kelly McGourty, Transportation Director, PSRC
John Ho, PE, Olympic Region Local Programs Engineer
Page 1 of 3
Project Summary
Program: Pedestrian and Bicyclist Program
Date: May 2025
Agency: City of Bremerton
Name of person who will complete the Local Project Reports: Gunnar Fridriksson
E-mail: gunnar.fridriksson@ci.bremerton.wa.us
Project Title: 6th Street Active Transportation Improvements
Project Description: Speed Feedback Signs, Pedestrian Refuge Islands, High-visibility Crosswalks,
“Turning Vehicles Stop for Pedestrians” Signs, Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons, Leading
Pedestrian Intervals, Bike Detection at Traffic Signals, Bicycle Intersection Crossing Markings,
Bicycle Boxes, Pedestrian and Bicyclist Illumination at the Crossings, Bike Lanes, Buffered Bike
Lanes, Separated Bike Lanes, Median Diverter
Detailed Project Description:
Intersections
1) Kitsap Way/SR 310 and
a. N Cambrian Ave:
i. Separated bike lanes
b. Wycoff Ave (Signalized):
i. Separated bike lanes
ii. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
c. Callow Ave (Signalized):
i. Separated bike lanes
ii. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
2) 6th St and
a. Montgomery Ave (Signalized)
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
ii. Separated bike lanes
b. Rainier Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
c. Bryan Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
d. Olympic Ave (Dual T-intersection)
i. Median turn restriction
ii. High-visibility crosswalk
iii. Pedestrian refuge island
iv. Rectangular rapid flashing beacon
v. Illumination for the pedestrian crossing
vi. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
e. Naval Ave (Signalized)
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
f. Roosevelt Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
g. Hewitt Ave (Dual T-intersection)
i. Median turn restriction
ii. High-visibility crosswalk
Page 2 of 3
iii. Pedestrian refuge island
iv. Rectangular rapid flashing beacon
v. Illumination for the pedestrian crossing
vi. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
h. Pennsylvania Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
i. High Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
j. Veneta Ave (Signalized)
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
k. Chester Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
ii. High-visibility crosswalk
iii. Rectangular rapid flashing beacon
iv. Illumination for pedestrian crossing
l. Broadway Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
m. Warren Ave (Signalized)
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
n. Park Ave (Signalized)
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
o. Pacific Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
p. Pleasant Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
q. Highland Ave
i. Green bicycle intersection crossing markings
r. Washington Ave (Signalized)
i. Green bike boxes
Segments
3) On Kitsap Way/SR 310 between 11th St and Callow Ave
a. Roadway reconfiguration
b. Separated bike lanes
4) On 6th St between Callow Ave and Montgomery Ave
a. Roadway reconfiguration
b. Separated bike lanes
5) On 6th St between Montgomery Ave and Park Ave
a. Roadway reconfiguration
b. Separated or buffered bike lanes (Montgomery Ave to Rainier Ave)
c. Bike lanes (Rainier Ave to Park Ave)
6) On 6th St between Park Ave and Pacific Ave
a. Roadway reconfiguration
b. Bike Lanes (Westbound)
c. Separated or buffered bike lanes (Eastbound)
7) On 6th St between Pacific Ave and Washington Ave
a. Roadway reconfiguration
b. Bike Lanes (Eastbound)
c. Separated or buffered bike lanes (Westbound)
WARSENAL
WAY
NE
SYLVANWAY
SHERIDAN RDWHEATON WAYSNYDER AVE11TH STTRACYTONBEACHRDNW
NAVAL AVE15TH ST
CORBET DR NW6TH ST WARREN AVEKITSAPWAY HIGH AVECHARLESTON B L VDN CALLOW AVEBURWELL ST
BREM
ERTONTUN
LSC HLEYBLVDPARK AVEMAGNUSON
WAY
E PHINNEY BAY DRE18TH
STWHEATON WAY26TH
ST
SYLVAN WAY
MARINE DRLEBO BLVD
1ST ST
WARREN AVE1ST ST
SHERIDANRD
13TH ST
WASHINGTONAVEWASHINGTON AVE25TH
ST
CALLAHAN
DR
E16TH
STWARREN AVEPACIFIC AVEPINE RDWARREN
AV E
14TH ST SHELDONBLV
DHARKINS
STWARRENAVE
WASHINGTONAVECLAREAVETRANS
I
T
TRA
F
F
IC
17TH
ST
CHARLESTONBLVDCALLAHANDRS HARTFORDAVE2ND STJUNIPER STN WYCOFF AVE4TH ST 5TH ST
10TH ST
8TH
ST
DRMLKINGWAYN MONTGOMERY AVEN
W
PHI
NNEYB
AY
DR
WARRENAVENUEBRGMANETTE
BRG
WDFW Habitat Program
CITY OF BREMERTON
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES
ENGINEERING DIVISION
DATE: 6/3/2024
345 6th Street, Suite 100 | Bremerton, WA | 98337-1891
6TH STREET ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
City Project #315060
Project Location
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
State
Department of Transportation
Local Programs State Funding
Agreement
Work by Public
Agencies
Agency and Address
Agreement Number Project Number
Project Title
Description of Work (See also “Exhibit A”)
Termini Advertisement Date Indirect Cost Rate
Yes No
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation,
acting by and through the Secretary of Transportation, hereinafter called the “STATE,” and the above named organization,
hereinafter call the “AGENCY.”
WHEREAS, the AGENCY is planning the work shown above, and in connection therewith, the AGENCY has requested
financial assistance for the project or program, and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY has requested funds for the above shown project or program, which has been selected by the
STATE for funding assistance.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, or attached
and incorporated and made a part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
Type of Work
PE
or
Planning
a. Agency
Estimate of Funding
(1)
Estimated Total
Funds
(2)
Estimated Agency
Funds
(3)
Estimated
State Funds
b. Other
c. Other
d. State Services
e. Total PE Cost Estimate
RW f. Agency
g. Other
h. Other
i. State Services
j. Total R/W Cost Estimate
CN k. Contract
l. Other
m. Other
n. Other
o. Agency
p. State Services
q. Total CN Cost Estimate
r. Total Project Cost Estimate
DOT Form 140-087LP Revised 12/2024● Previous Versions Obsolete ●Page 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
_________________________________________________ _________________________________________________
___________________________________ ________________________________________
I
General
The AGENCY agrees to perform the above described work in accordance
with the Project Application attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and made a
part of this AGREEMENT.
Plans, specifications, and cost estimates shall be prepared by the
AGENCY in accordance with the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction and adopted
design standards, unless otherwise noted. The AGENCY will incorporate
the plans and specifications into the AGENCY’s project and thereafter
advertise the resulting project for bid and, assuming bids are received
and a contract is awarded, administer the contract, or if the project is of
a size which the AGENCY is authorized to perform with its own forces
under the laws of the State of Washington, the AGENCY may proceed
with its own forces.
All work performed under this AGREEMENT shall comply with the
applicable provisions of state law.
II
Payment
The STATE, in consideration of the faithful performance of the work to
be performed by the AGENCY, agrees to reimburse the AGENCY for
the percentage of the actual direct and related indirect cost of the work
shown above, up to the “MAXIMUM AMOUNT AUTHORIZED”. The
agency will comply with Governmental Accounting Auditing and Financial
Reporting Standards and applicable state law and local regulations,
policies and procedures. No payment will be made for work done prior to
execution of this AGREEMENT.
Partial payments shall be made by the STATE, upon request of the
AGENCY, to cover costs incurred. These payments are not to be more
frequent than one (1) per month. It is agreed that any such partial
payment will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any
item and that, at the time of the final audit, all required adjustments will
be made and reflected in a final payment. The AGENCY agrees to submit
a final bill to the STATE within forty-five (45) days after the AGENCY has
completed work.
The AGENCY agrees that all costs in excess of the amount authorized
and the AGENCY’s matching funds shall be the responsibility of the
AGENCY.
III
Audit
The AGENCY agrees that an audit may be conducted by the STATE.
During the progress of the work and for a period not less than three (3)
years from the date of final payment to the AGENCY, the records and
accounts pertaining to the work and accounting thereof are to be kept
available for inspection and audit by the STATE and copies of all records,
accounts, documents, or other data pertaining to the project will be
furnished upon request. If any litigation, claim, or audit is commenced,
the records and accounts along with supporting documentation shall
be retained until all litigation, claim, or audit finding has been resolved
even though such litigation, claim, or audit continues past the three-year
retention period.
IV
Legal Relations
No liability shall attach to the AGENCY or the STATE by reason of
entering into this AGREEMENT except as expressly provided herein.
V
Nondiscrimination
The AGENCY agrees to comply with all applicable state and federal
laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to nondiscrimination and agrees
to require the same of all subcontractors providing services or performing
any work using funds provided under this AGREEMENT.
VI
Venue
For the convenience of the parties to this AGREEMENT, it is agreed that
any claims and/or causes of action which the AGENCY has against the
STATE, growing out of this AGREEMENT or the project or program with
which it is concerned, shall be brought only in the Superior Court for
Thurston County.
VII
Termination
The Secretary of the Department of Transportation may terminate this
AGREEMENT if the funding becomes unavailable or if the Secretary
determines that it is in the best interest of the STATE.
VIII
Final Report and Final Inspection
Within ninety (90) days following the completion of the project and
submission of the final billing for the project, a final report and/or final
inspection shall be submitted to the Director, Highways & Local Programs
containing the following information:
Non-Capital Projects
1. A description of the project or program.
2. A summary of actual costs of the project or program.
3. An evaluation of the project or program. This should address
aspects such as transportation and/or other benefits to the
public.
Capital Projects
1. A final inspection is required.
IX
Supplement
This agreement may be modified or supplemented only in writing by
parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on the day and year last written below.
AGENCY
By:
Title:
Agency Date:
S TATE
By:
Director, Local Programs
Date Executed:
DOT Form 140-087LP Revised 12/2024 ● Previous Versions Obsolete ●Page 2
Instructions – Local Programs State Funding Agreement
1. Name and Address – Enter the agency name and billing address of the lead agency that will become a party to
the agreement.
2. Agreement Number – MUST be left blank. This number will be assigned by WSDOT.
3. Project Number – MUST be left blank. This number will be assigned by WSDOT.
4. Description of Work – Enter a concise statement of the major items of work to be performed. If applicable, attach
the signed Project Summary from the project’s selection letter as “Exhibit A”.
5. Project Title – Enter the project’s title.
6. Termini – Enter the begin and end points of the project.
7. Advertisement Date – At construction phase authorization only, enter the proposed construction contract
advertisement date.
8. Indirect Cost Rate
a. Check the Yes box if the agency will be claiming indirect costs on the project. For those projects claiming
indirect costs, supporting documentation that clearly shows the indirect cost rate being utilized by the agency
must be provided with the Local Programs State Funding Agreement. Indirect cost rate approval by your
cognizant agency or through your agency’s self-certification and supporting documentation is required to be
available for review by WSDOT and/or State Auditor.
b. Check the No box if the agency will not be claiming indirect costs on the project.
9. Type of Work and Funding (Round all dollar amounts to the nearest whole dollar)
a. Planning – For projects that only include planning and/or study activities, lines a through d show Planning costs
for the project by type of work (e.g., agency, consultant, state services, etc.).
• Line a – Enter the estimated cost of agency performed work in columns 1 through 3.
• Line b & c – Identify consultant, etc., and enter the estimated amounts in columns 1 through 3.
• Line d – State Services. Every project must have funding for state services. Enter the estimated amounts in
columns 1 through 3.
• Line e – Total of lines a + b + c + d.
b. Preliminary Engineering – For projects authorizing a Preliminary Engineering phase, lines a through d show PE
costs for the project by type of work (e.g., agency, consultant, state services, etc.).
• Line a – Enter the estimated cost of agency performed work in columns 1 through 3.
• Line b & c – Identify consultant, etc., and enter the estimated amounts in columns 1 through 3.
• Line d – State Services. Every project must have funding for state services. Enter the estimated amounts in
columns 1 through 3.
• Line e – Total of lines a + b + c + d.
c. Right of Way – For projects authorizing a Right of Way phase, lines f through i show RW costs for the project by
type of work (e.g., agency, consultant, state services, etc.).
• Line g & h – Identify consultant, etc., and enter the estimated amounts in columns 1 through 3.
• Line i – State Services. Every project must have funding for state services. Enter the estimated amounts in
columns 1 through 3.
• Line j – Total of lines f + g + h + i.
d. Construction – For projects authorizing a Construction phase, lines k through p show CN costs for the project
by type of work (e.g., contract, agency, consultant, state services, etc.).
• Line k – Enter the estimated cost of the CN contract in columns 1 through 3.
• Lines l, m, & n – Identify consultant, utilities, etc., and enter the estimated amounts in columns 1 through 3.
• Line o – Enter the estimated cost of agency performed work in columns 1 through 3.
• Line p – State Services. Every project must have funding for state services. Enter the estimated amounts in
columns 1 through 3.
• Line q – Total of lines k + l + m + n + o + p.
e. Total Project Cost Estimate
• Line r – Total Cost Estimate of the Project. Total of lines e + j + q.
10.Signatures – An authorized official of the local agency signs the agreement and enters their title and date of
signature (include month, day, and year). Note: Do NOT enter a date on the Date Executed line.
DOT Form 140-087LP Revised 12/2024● Previous Versions Obsolete ●Page 3
6 TH STREET
Active Transportation Improvement Project
City Council Study Session
September 10, 2025
Nick Ataie, P.E. – PW&U Engineering Division
Acceptance of Grant Funds
Agenda Bill Schedule
Public Works Committee (08/18/25)
City Council (09/17/25)
GRANT OVERVIEW
WSDOT Pedestrian & Bicycle Program
The Pedestrian and Bicycle program objective is to
improve the transportation system to enhance safety and
mobility for people who choose to walk or bike.
Spring 2024
Project Request
Submitted
Summer 2024
WSDOT Review
& Site Meeting
Fall 2024
Application
Update
Submitted
Winter 2024
WSDOT Report
to Legislature
Spring 2025
State Legislative
Session Ends
Summer 2025
Notice of Project
Award
▪State Funding
▪No Local Match
Requirement
$3.16 Million in Awarded Project Funding
Construction Phase with Minor Right-of-Way Phase
GRANT APPLICATION SCOPE
•Application Required Defined Scope
of Work
•Scope Developed in Collaboration
with WSDOT to Allow Flexibility
•Future Scope Modifications Require
WSDOT Concurrence
•WSDOT Cannot Provide Additional
Grant Funding Beyond Award
GRANT APPLICATION KEY SCOPE ELEMENTS
•Roadway Reconfiguration (Corridor-Wide) 1
•Separated Bike Lanes (W of Montgomery) 2
•Bike Lanes (E of Montgomery) 3
•Green Pavement Markings (Major Intersections)
•RRFB Enhanced Crossings (Olympic, Hewitt, Chester)
•Traffic Signal Modifications
1 Reduction in general purpose vehicle lanes, parking modifications,
lane width reductions, and/or turn lane installation or removal
2 May include deviations from WSDOT guidance considering
NACTO/AASHTO guidance for constrained corridors
3 Includes evaluation of buffered bike lane and/or separated bike lanes
where feasible
PROJECT FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
DESIGN
Locally Funded
Expanded Concept Design
Underway
Expanded Project Scope
Anticipated to Require
Additional Funding for
Complete Design
Development (TBD)
$700,000
RIGHT-OF-WAY
Allocated in Grant
Only Includes Very Minor
Right-of-Way Cost in
Alignment with Project Scope
at Time of Application
$50,000
CONSTRUCTION
Allocated in Grant
Includes Anticipated External
Construction Management
Support
Grant Request Included
Assumed Design Elements at
Time of Application
$3,110,000
WSDOT Pedestrian & Bicycle Program
OPEN HOUSE REMINDER
NICK ATAIE, PE
PROJECT MANAGER – ENGINEERING
NICK.ATAIE@CI.BREMERTON.WA.US
360-473-2306
QUESTIONS & DISCUSSION
www.bremertonwa.gov/6thStreetProject
6th Street Active Transportation Improvement Project
WSDOT AWARD SCOPE
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: September 10th, 2025
Renewal of Professional Services
Agreement with Imperial Parking, Inc. for
Parking Enforcement and Management
Services
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 17th, 2025
Department: Finance/IT
Presenter: Melinda Monroe
Phone: (360) 473-5306
SUMMARY: The City would like to offer a renewal of the Parking Enforcement and management
services agreement to Imperial Parking Services, Inc. / dba Impark.
ATTACHMENTS: Renewal PSA
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Included in 2026 Budget
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☒ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the agreement with Imperial parking services as presented and authorize the Mayor
to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 04/19/2024
6A
Page 1 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
PARKING ENFORCEMENT AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES
THIS RENEWAL to the Professional Services Agreement dated July 1, 2011 (the effective
date) between the City of Bremerton (“City”) and Imperial Parking (U.S.), Inc. (“Operator”),
referred to collectively as the “Parties,” enter into the following Agreement for professional
services:
WHEREAS, the City and Imperial Parking (U.S.), Inc. entered into a Professional
Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”) effective July 1, 2011, for parking services; and
WHEREAS, effective October 12, 2011, Imperial Parking (U.S.), Inc. converted from a
corporation to a Delaware limited liability company known as Imperial Parking (U.S.), LLC and,
by operation of law, assumed all the rights and obligations of Imperial Parking (U.S.), Inc.
including, without limitation, those pursuant to the Services Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2016, the Parties entered into Contract Modification No. 1
(amendment) to the Services Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2016, the Parties entered into Contract Modification No. 2
(amendment) to the Services Agreement (the Services Agreement as thereby amended is herein
called the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2019, the Parties entered into Contract Modification No. 3
(amendment) to the Services Agreement (the Services Agreement as thereby amended is herein
called the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2019, the Parties entered into Contract Modification No.
4 (amendment) to the Services Agreement (the Services Agreement as thereby amended is herein
called the “Agreement”);and
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2022, the Parties entered into Contract Modification No. 5
(amendment) to the Services Agreement (the Services Agreement as thereby amended is herein
called the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, on March 24th, 2023, the Parties entered into Contract Modification No. 6
(amendment) to the Services Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on April 24th, 2023, the Parties entered into Contract Modification No. 7
(amendment) to the Services Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to enter into a renewal of the Services Agreement
containing the following terms and conditions, which shall supersede all other amendments and
agreements;
Page 2 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants and agreements
herein contained, the parties agree as follows:
RENEWAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
IMPERIAL PARKING (U.S.), LLC
The City of Bremerton (“City”) and Imperial Parking (U.S.), LLC (“Operator”), referred
to collectively as the “Parties,” enter into the following Agreement for professional services:
I. Definitions: For the purposes of this agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto the
following terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meanings given herein
when indicated within the text of the Services Agreement by being capitalized.
a. Downtown Core: the streets and public right-of-way between Warren Avenue and 6th
street, Bremerton, Washington and including the 600 block to the 900 block of Pacific
Avenue and the 600 block to the 800 block of Park Avenue, Bremerton, Washington,
98337.
b. Overtime enforcement action: includes a chalk of a vehicle and the resulting actions
necessary to determine if a warning, citation, impound or boot of a vehicle is warranted.
c. Flat fee Monitoring and Parking Violation enforcement of On-street zones per
Municipal Code 10.10. Including Flat fee, monitoring and ticketing, random and on-
call residential patrols. Location: Bremerton City Limits in all enforcement zones.
Time: 7 days per week excluding City observed Holidays.
d. Hourly Special Event Enforcement. provide enforcement as needed and determined by
the City for larger functions at the parking facilities. Normally, the attendants will be
required for one hour before and until one hour after the scheduled start time for the
event. Location: Bremerton City Limits Time: As needed/ requested basis only.
e. Off-street Enforcement and Monitoring of City Owned Property in all zones per
Municipal Code 10.10. Location: Bremerton City Limits in all enforcement zones, City
owned Garages and Lots, City Parks, City owned properties. Time: 7 days per week
excluding City observed Holidays.
f. Commuter Area Parking Enforcement. Monitoring and parking violation enforcement
on street in zoned areas impacted by commuter parking per Bremerton Municipal Code
10.10. Location: Bremerton City Limits in all enforcement zones as needed with
enforcement minimums in Downtown Core, SW and SE Zones Time: 7 days per week
excluding City observed Holidays.
II. Scope: The Operator agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the
Scope of Work, dated January 1, 2026, including any attachments thereto, attached hereto
as Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be
modified only pursuant to Section VII.H of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides
for unspecified additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express
written request of the City. Operator further represents that the services furnished under
this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional
practices in effect at the time such services are performed.
Page 3 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
III. Term: The term of this Agreement shall be five (5) years. The City and the Operator agree
that work will begin on the tasks described in Exhibit A commencing January 1, 2026
through December 31, 2030.
IV. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the
City shall pay Operator in an amount not to exceed a monthly amount of $32,805.13.
Operator’s charges and bills shall conform to the fee schedule including applicable annual
CPI increases, attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. The
Operator shall submit regular billing statements detailing work performed and amount
charged on each task or portion thereof. The descriptions shall conform to and fall within
the categories set out in the Scope of Work and/or Fee Schedule. Upon receipt of a
conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment. The Operator's
labor rates and billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibit C. Operator shall not perform
work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated for such work, unless the Scope
of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this Agreement. Operator
shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant to Section II and,
if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in accordance with Exhibit C. If a
billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold payment until
the statement is brought into compliance. Such withholding does not relieve Operator of
its obligations under this Agreement.
V. Relationship of Parties: Operator represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed in
the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its
field of expertise. Operator and its personnel are independent Operators and not employees
of the City. Operator and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the
City’s employees and other Operators. None of the benefits provided by the City to its
employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment
insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub -
Operators of the Operator. Operator will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and
for the acts of Operator's agents, employees, representatives and sub-Operators during the
performance of this Agreement. As an independent Operator, Operator is responsible for
its own management. The City’s administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall
not be deemed an exercise of managerial control over Operator or its personnel. As an
independent Operator, Operator is responsible for payment of all taxes and licensing fees
necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees include
but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State professional
licensing, and City business licensing. If any taxes or fees due the City have been declared
delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges
arising from the delinquency, from any payments due Operator.
VI. Indemnification:
A. The Operator shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against all
claims, liabilities, costs, and expenses arising in connection with any negligence or intentional
misconduct of the Operator, its employees, invitees, and any others for whom the Operator is at
Page 4 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
law responsible, except to the extent caused by the willful misconduct or negligent act or omission
of the City.
B. Architects, Engineers and Any Other Professional Listed In and Performing
Services Defined in RCW 4.24.115. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that
Operator’s services provided pursuant to this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the
event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused
by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Operator and the City, its officers, officials,
employees, agents and volunteers, the Operator's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of
the Operator's negligence.
IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE
INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE OPERATOR'S WAIVER OF
IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE
PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLE DGE
THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER.
The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
VII. Insurance: The Operator shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Operator, its agents,
representatives, employees, sub-Operators or sub-Operators.
Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Operator shall
provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing:
1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined
single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and
2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with
limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general
aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall
include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed
operations/broad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground
(XCU) if applicable; and
3. Excess Liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 limit per
occurrence and aggregate; and
4. Crime and Employer’s Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000
limit per occurrence/claim; and
5. Workers Compensation insurance as statutorily required by the Industrial
Insurance Act of the State of Washington, Title 51, Revised Code of Washington
and employer's liability with limits not less than $1,000,000.
Any payment of deductible or self-insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the
Operator.
Page 5 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
All required policies shall be provided on an “occurrence” basis except professional
liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a “claims-made” basis.
The City shall be included as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability
insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Operator and a copy of an
endorsement that is acceptable to the City, which names the City as an additional insured shall be
attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of
all the required insurance policies and endorsements. The City further reserves the right to reject
any unacceptable policies and/or endorsements.
The Operator's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that
coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability.
The Operator's insurance shall be primary and non-contributory insurance as respects the
City and shall contain a waiver of subrogation against the City for claims arising out of any
operations, liabilities and obligations to which coverage applies. It shall be an affirmative
obligation upon Operator to advise the City’s Risk Manager by fax at (360) 473-5161, or by
certified mail, return receipt requested to City of Bremerton, Attn: Risk Management, 345 6th
Street, Suite 100, Bremerton, WA 98337 within two days of the cancellation, suspension or
substantive change of any insurance policy set out herein, and failure to do so shall be construed
to be a breach of this Agreement.
The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason, proof
of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as evidence
of coverage.
In the event that the Operator employs other Operators or Operators (sub-Operators or sub-
Operators) as part of the work covered by this Agreement, it shall be the Operator’s responsibility
to require and confirm that each sub-Operator or sub-Operator meets the minimum insurance
requirements specified above. The Operator shall, upon demand of the City, deliver to the City
copies of such policy or policies of insurance and the receipts for payment of premiums thereon.
Operator may meet the limits of insurance required under this Agreement through a
combination of primary and excess coverage and that Operator shall include the City as an
additional insured (rather than name the City).
VIII. General Conditions:
A. Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Operator shall furnish
periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and documents
shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Operator shall maintain accounting records in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) to substantiate all billed
amounts.
Page 6 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
B. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents: Original documents, drawings,
designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the
property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Operator in connection
with the services performed by the Operator under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the
Operator to at least the same extent as the Operator safeguards like information relating to its own
business. If such information is publicly available or is already in Operator's possession or known
to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Operator from third parties, Operator shall bear no
responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise.
All data, documents and files created by Operator under this Agreement may be stored at
Operator's office in Bremerton, Washington. Operator shall make such data, documents, and files
available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying
and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such information in the
City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the City upon its request,
and at reasonable cost.
All documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software or other
items prepared or furnished by Operator pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments of service
with respect to the project and are the property of the City. Any reuse by the City for other than
the specific purpose intended will be at City’s sole risk.
C. Use of Photographs and Images. Operator shall not use or distribute photographs
or images depicting City officials, personnel, property, or equipment whether prepared by Operator
or provided by City without prior written consent of the City. The City will not unreasonably
withhold its consent.
D. Work Performed at Operator's Risk: Operator shall take all precautions necessary
and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub -Operators in the
performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All
work shall be done at Operator's own risk, and Operator shall be responsible for any loss of or
damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work.
E. Place of Work: The Operator shall perform the work authorized under this
Agreement at its offices in Bremerton, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in
Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at locations mutually agreed
upon by the parties.
F. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire
agreement between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements,
written or oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement.
G. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
H. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed
by both Parties.
Page 7 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
I. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the
parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1st class mail, or by personal service, and
shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Ag reement
or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing.
Notices to be sent to: Notices to be sent to:
CITY: OPERATOR:
Attn: Finance Director Attn: Legal
City of Bremerton Imperial Parking (U.S.), LLC
345 6th Street, Suite 100 307 7th Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98337-1891 New York, NY 1001
Copy to:
legalnotice@reimaginedparking.com
J. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a
waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be
deemed waiver of any other right or power.
K. Non-Waiver of Breach: The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of
any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred
in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants,
agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect.
L. Compliance with Laws: Operator shall comply with all applicable Federal, State,
and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement.
M. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the
laws of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this
Agreement shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court.
N. Attorneys’ Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions
herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney’s fees.
O. Assignment: Any assignment of this agreement by the Operator without the written
consent of the City shall be void.
IX. Equal Employment Opportunity Statement: In the hiring of employees for the
performance of work under this Agreement, the Operator, its sub-operators, or any person acting
on behalf of Operator shall not discriminate in any employment practice on the basis of age (40+),
sex, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation/gender identity, marital status, military
status, or the presence of any physical, mental or sensory disability.
Page 8 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
X. ADA Statement: The City of Bremerton does not discriminate on the basis of disability
in programs and activities, which it operates pursuant to the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, and ADA Amendments Act. This policy extends to both employment
and admission to participation in the programs, services and activities of the City of
Bremerton. Reasonable accommodation for employees or applicants for employment will be
provided.
XI. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated by written instrument upon mutual
consent. Termination may be made by the City or Operator for convenience on ninety (90) day
advanced written notice. Termination may be made by the City or Operator for convenience on
ninety (90) day advanced written notice. This agreement may be immediately terminated for cause
by a Party if the other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party,
and the non-performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within
thirty (30) days of the terminating Party’s sending notice to the non-performing Party. The City
may withhold payment, until the corrective action is completed, but may not withhold payment
longer than thirty (30) days after correction is completed.
In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the Operator to the
effective date of termination provided by such notice, and any applicable reimbursement pursuant
to the provisions of Exhibit A. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and
data within the Operator’s possession pertaining to this project which may be used without
restriction by the City. Any such use not related to the project which Operator was contracted to
perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Operator.
XII. Force Majeure. Operator shall not be deemed to be in default and shall not be liable for
failure to perform under this Agreement if Operator’s performance is prevented or delayed by
Force Majeure. For purposes of this Agreement, the term Force Majeure shall mean any acts of
God, including landslides, lightning, forest fires, storms, floods, freezing and earthquakes,
terrorism, civil disturbances, strikes, lockouts or other industrial labor disturbances, acts of the
public enemy, wars, blockades, public riots, explosions, governmental restraint or causes, whether
of the kind enumerated otherwise, that are not reasonably within the control of the Operator.
XIII. Suspension & Debarment. For contracts involving Washington State and Federal
funding, Operator hereby certifies, by signing this agreement, that neither it nor its principals are
presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this transaction by any State or Federal department or
agency. Operator shall provide immediate written notice to the City if at any time it learns that it
is or has become ineligible for certification. Should Operator enter into a covered transaction
with another firm, Operator agrees by signing this agreement that it will verify that the firm with
whom it intends to do business is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, excluded or disqualified.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below have executed this Agreement.
Page 9 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
CITY OF BREMERTON IMPERIAL PARKING (U.S.), INC.
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
By: By:
Kylie J. Finnell, Bremerton City Attorney Angela Hoover, City Clerk
Page 10 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF SERVICES
Effective January 1, 2026
I. OPERATIONS
A. GENERALLY.
1. Operator shall be responsible for all aspects of recruitment and selection
of parking enforcement personnel.
2. Limited Commission – Operator shall provide the City of Bremerton
Police Department with all personnel information required to investigate and issue a Limited
Commission in accordance with RCW and BMC chapter 10. The City shall review all
information regarding a prospective parking enforcement employee prior to authorization of
issuance of a Limited Commission and reserves the right to not offer commission. The operator
shall ensure that all Parking Enforcement Officers maintain active limited commissions and
notify City staff of any impeding lapse of commission within 30 days of enforcement
commission.
3. Operator shall provide all enforcement personnel with professional
appearing uniforms including jackets. Uniform jackets and shirts shall have attached patches or
emblems whether printed or sewn, on the sleeves with an emblem designating the wearer as
official parking enforcement personnel. All enforcement personnel must carry photo
identification and a copy of their commission while on duty. The operating company will have
responsibility for the overall daily operation of the identified City-owned and leased parking
facilities. The operating company will develop the staffing plan, operating procedures, and other
portions of the policies and procedures necessary to operate the parking facilities in an efficient
and cost-effective manner. A thorough working knowledge of the latest parking technology and
systems, including but not limited to, validation programs, valet parking systems, and parking
management practices is considered essential. The operating company will be expected to note
problems or opportunities for improvement and make recommendations to the City’s Designated
Representative as to possible policy or operational changes. The operating company shall
always maintain a high standard for personnel and performance, consistent with good customer
relations. The operating company shall control the conduct, demeanor and performance of its
employees to ensure that good, efficient and courteous service shall be furnished all users of the
parking facilities on a fair, equal and non-discriminatory basis. Additionally, the operating
company is specifically authorized to exercise such control as it deems reasonably necessary for
the orderly, safe, sanitary and secure use thereof, and to prevent or discourage disturbances,
illegal acts and violations of laws, regulations, ordinances and rules of the City.
B. COMMUNICATIONS. All enforcement personnel shall have ready access to their
supervisor or appointee and to the Bremerton Police Department.
C. MAINTENANCE. The Operator shall notify the City of Bremerton facilities contact for
removal of trash and debris or of other observed safety concerns. Notwithstanding anything to the
Page 11 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
contrary in this Agreement, the parties agree and acknowledge that Operator is not responsible for
(i) claims or liabilities to the extent caused by the acts or omissions of the City of Bremerton, third
parties or its or their personnel, Operators, or agents or (ii) safety or repairs or maintenance to the
structures or systems of the premises.
D. RESPONSIBILITIES. The Operator shall:
1. Issue time and date stamped parking ticket receipts for all electronic
and/or manual pay parking stations and issue date and time stamp parking citations or other
infractions at all enforcement locations.
2. Collect money for all parking stations whether from physical meters or
from digital stations, parking permits, plus daily, monthly and event parking fees.
3. Ensure that all parking income collected by the operating company shall
be accounted for and deposited at least one time weekly and no later than the last calendar day
of calendar month revenue was remitted in, to the designated city account. Bank deposit slips,
and reports and shall be submitted to the City Treasurer’s Office at least one time weekly.
4. Invoicing of enforcement services will be itemized as applicable by:
Enforcement Type, Enforcement Zone, location and date per Exhibits E & F, Enforcement
Type Definitions and per Exhibit G City owned property, lots, garages and meters listings.
5. Issue parking citation violation tickets for parking violations when
appropriate.
6. Implement, enforce, and acknowledge all City of Bremerton Parking
Policies. Likewise, the City of Bremerton is responsible to communicate and share all
applicable parking policies with Impark Employees and Limited Commission Parking
Enforcement Officers and agents that service the City of Bremerton.
E. ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES. The City will provide at least one vehicle and at least
one low speed vehicle(s), known as the City Vehicle(s), for enforcement during the term of this
agreement. Additional vehicles the number, nature and type of enforcement vehicles, if any, (i.e.:
scooters, bikes or other) is solely discretionary with the Operator. The Operator will be
responsible for holding at their expense Automobile Liability coverage for the City vehicle(s)
while providing services to the City, including Comprehensive and Collision liability policies, a
General Liability policy, and an Umbrella liability policy insurance coverage at the minimums
outlined in Section VII. of the Services Agreement for the duration of this agreement as
amended. The Operator will be responsible to provide regular maintenance services on City
vehicles utilized by the operator with reimbursement available by the City in each billing cycle
or at the City’s discretion and direction the City may provide direct maintenance. The Operator
will fuel City vehicles via a City owned Fuel Card or electric charging station and accept liability
for all agents and employees of the operator that have access to assigned Fuel Card, use and
charge of electric vehicle, and the City Vehicle(s).
II. SCOPE OF REQUESTED SERVICES AND SERVICE FEE
A. FLAT FEE MONITORING AND TICKETING:
Operator shall provide monitoring and ticketing services enforcing the parking
codes of the City of Bremerton, in all enforcement zones with not less than the following
Page 12 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
frequencies for the following enforcement types:
1. DOWNTOWN CORE ENFORCEMENT: Downtown Zone for on-street
restricted parking in the Downtown Core: Not less than three times daily, Monday – Saturday
excluding City Holidays, with an annual average minimum of one-hundred and sixty (160) hours
per month. Additionally, there shall be at least one (1) full overtime enforcement action patrol,
including chalking and resulting citations, throughout the Downtown Core and to the end of the
900 Block of Pacific Avenue Monday - Saturday. This enforcement type is reimbursed via the
agreed upon flat fee amount.
Flat fee hours for the Downtown Core Enforcement shall be covered under the
monthly flat fee rate of: $7,520.00
2. RANDOM RESTRICTED ENFORCEMENT: the operator will schedule
random checks in all enforcement zones for an annual average minimum of one-hundred and
twenty (120) hours per month, Monday through Sunday, excluding City Holidays. Included in
this response is Right-of-way violation enforcement actions. This enforcement type is
reimbursed via the agreed upon flat fee amount.
Flat fee hours for the Random On-Call Enforcement shall be covered under the
monthly flat fee rate of: $5,637.70
3. EAST ZONE ENFORCEMENT: included in this type of enforcement provided
at not less than one times daily, Monday – Saturday excluding City Holidays, with an annual
average minimum of one-hundred and twenty (120) hours per month.
Flat fee hours for the East Zone Enforcement shall be covered under the monthly
flat fee rate of: $1,146.00
4. ON-CALL ENFORCEMENT in all zones will be based on complaint
basis only response. Monthly Invoice will define the enforcement type, hours and location. More
than forty (40) hours per month requires City approval.
Flat fee hours for the On-Call Enforcement shall be covered under
the monthly flat fee rate of: $1,879.23
5. COMMUTER PARKING ENFORCEMENT: On-street parking
enforcement in the commuter impacted zones at not less than one-hundred and sixty (160) hours
per month. Locations include the SW Zone, the SE Zone and the Downtown core related to all
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Access points.
Flat fee hours for the Commuter Zone Enforcement shall be covered under
the monthly flat fee rate of: $3,690.20
6. CITY OWNED GARAGES: Provide parking enforcement and
management in City-owned Garages. Garages will receive not less than twice daily reviews
and one daily overtime enforcement action, Monday through Sunday. Garages will receive
one (1) daily timed enforcement. Flat fee enforcement for City Owned Off-street lots and,
Garages shall be covered under the monthly flat fee rate of:
Page 13 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
$3.184.00
7. CITY OWNED SURFACE LOTS AND PARKS: Provide parking
enforcement and management in City-owned surface lots. Paid lots will receive 1 daily timed-
enforcement action. This does not include repair and maintenance of lot meters. Park property
will receive an annual average enforcement of not less than sixty (60) hours per month during
park hours of operation. Park Property enforcement will occur at the parks identified by the
Parking Enforcement office manager and at the office manager’s discretion.
Flat fee enforcement for City-owned on-street lots shall be covered under the monthly flat fee
rate of: $2,748.00
8. VEHICLE IMMBOLIZATION: in all zones will be based on Enforcement
Officer recommendation for vehicles that qualify per the Bremerton Municipal Code. A
minimum of fifteen (15) hours per month will be provided and more than eighty (80) hours per
month will require City approval.
Flat fee hours for the On-Call Vehicle Immobilization Enforcement shall be
covered under the flat fee rate of:$_400.00
Parking enforcement types and hours of this Section A shall be covered under the monthly Flat
fee total rate of: $_26,205.13*
*Service Fee Adjustments: An annual increase will be applied to the rates in Section II. Scope of
Requested Service and Service Fee. A. Effective upon the annual contract anniversary date,
2027, the increase shall be based on the Consumer Price Index-W change for Seattle-Tacoma-
Bremerton, All Urban Consumers 1982-84 (CPI-U) as published by the US Department of
Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for June of the year of increase. The annual increase factor will
be limited by a cap of 8% in any given year.
B. HOURLY RATE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL EVENTS.
The operator will be required to provide supplemental parking attendants (one per
floor, 2 attendants) as needed and determined by the City for larger functions at the parking
facilities. Scheduling requests for operator presence at such events will occur at least 1 month
prior to the event. It is currently estimated that there will be 20± such events annually.
Normally, the attendants will be required for one hour before and until one hour after the
scheduled start time for the event. Reporting of hours and number employee worked with the
date and name of the event will be provided with invoicing. Additional attendants as needed and
requested at the following hourly rate per attendant:
Hourly Rate per Attendant: $23.75*
*Service Fee Adjustments: An annual increase will be applied to the rates in Section II. Scope of
Requested Service and Service Fee. B Special Events Only. Effective upon the annual contract
anniversary in 2027, the increase shall be based on the Consumer Price Index-W change for
Page 14 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, All Urban Consumers 1982-84 (CPI-U) as published by the US
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for June of the year of increase. The annual
increase factor will be limited by a cap of 8% in any given year.
C. OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
The operator will be required to maintain an office in the City of Bremerton
Downtown Core five days a week, open not less than 7 hours a day. The specific days and hours
to be negotiated with the city Designated Representative. The City will provide contact
information to the operator for specific City departmental representative communications to be
used by the operator to notify city divisions as appropriate. The City will reimburse lease cost
in a mutually agreed amount not to exceed $1,800.00 per month. Should the City terminate this
Agreement without cause prior to the expiration of Operator’s lease agreement, the City agrees
to reimburse the Operator’s costs of the lease in an amount not to exceed $1,800.00 per month
for the term of the lease. The City will provide garbage service. Operator will be responsible for
electricity, water (if any), phone, business license and all other costs.
a) The city will also provide space for storing of up to 3 vehicles.
b) Operator shall maintain local phone number and e-mail address for receipt
of public requests comments and complaints that will be monitored daily Monday – Friday,
except City Holidays. Office Support: Customer Service support for 6 hours per day during
normal business hours Monday through Friday, except City Holidays.
c) Personnel. The operator shall be required to separate personnel so that no
individual has responsibility or access for enforcement, repair and/or revenue collection from
pay stations.
D. RESIDENTIAL PERMITS AND ADMINISTRATION:
1. Residential, street and parking garage permits, will be managed and issued by
Operator at office or online during normal business hours. Operator would issue residential
permits types as outlined in the Bremerton Municipal Code, or in accordance with City
contracts and policy.
2. Operator shall assume responsibility for updating and maintaining the Residential
Parking Permit Program database and any other permit databases.
3. Residential Permits are currently issued for five (5) residential Parking Permit
Areas and one (Downtown, NW, NE, SW, SE) “Permit Only” zone.
4. Office Administration in support of permits and citation issuance shall be provided
at full-time hours
Monthly Flat Rate: $1,200.00
E. MANAGEMENT, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE OF ELECTRONIC PAY
STATIONS OR ONLINE PAYMENT OPTIONS
1. City Parking Pay stations. The electronic pay stations or equivalent shall have
debit/credit card, real time authorization, coin and bill capabilities. Said equipment and software
shall be repaired and maintained at a standard not less than set forth in Exhibit C as amended, of
Page 15 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
the Services Agreement.
Garages (3 locations).
Lot 90: Conference Center at 1st & Washington (6 stations on second and third floor
levels)
Lot 91: Washington Avenue Garage - between Fourth & Fifth Streets (2 stations on first
floor level and vestibule)
Lot 92: Park Avenue Plaza (5 stations on two levels)
On Street/Off Street Surface Parking (7 Electronic Pay Stations maintenance and collection)
The monthly rate payable by the City to Operator for, repair and maintenance of
electronic pay stations. $100 per meter per month per meter
Total Monthly Rate with current 20 meters: $2,000
2. Meter Damage. If a meter or Pay station sign is damaged beyond replacement or
maintenance standards the meter will be replace at cost to the City. The operator is responsible to
order replacement meters and assist with the coordination of installation and invoicing. The City
will pay for installation and utilize warranty agreements as available.
3. Use of Affiliates. The City acknowledges and agrees that Operator may from time-to-
time purchase goods, supplies and services from or through Operator and its Affiliates. If an
Affiliate performs services Operator is required to provide under this Agreement, Operator shall
be ultimately responsible to the City for Operator's Affiliate's performance. For purposes of this
Agreement, "Affiliates" means any entity directly or indirectly controlled by, controlling or under
common control with Operator.
F. REVENUE REMITTANCE AND REPORTING.
1. Revenue Collection. The Operator shall process all revenues collected pursuant to
this Agreement as follows:
a) Meter Revenue (On-Street and Off-Street). Cash revenues shall be
collected at least once per week and deposited directly to City’s bank account.
b) Credit Card Revenues (On-Street and Off-Street). shall be processed
through the City’s merchant account or account held for the City by the operator whichever
holding arrangement results in savings for the City.
c) Pay by Phone or other Payment Collection Software System (On-Street
and Off-Street). Revenues shall be deposited to Operator’s account or the City’s Merchant
account and be remitted to the City on or before the 15th of each month with respect to the
preceding calendar month.
d) Monthly Parking. Revenues shall be deposited to the Operator’s bank
account and remitted to City on or before the 15th of each month with respect to the proceeding
calendar month, after deduction by Operator of all credit card account fees.
e) Violations fees from City controlled parking areas. Fines from these
Page 16 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
sources will be processed by the Operator using equipment, supplies and software provided by
the City and all revenues will be received directly by the City and not by the Operator.
f) Violations fees from metered parking areas. Fines from these sources will
be processed by the Operator using equipment and stationery provided by the City and all
revenues will be received directly by the City and not by the Operator.
g) Leasehold Tax. The City shall be responsible for the remittance of any
parking tax and any applicable Washington State sales taxes for all revenues received and
remitted by the Operator on the City’s behalf, and the City hereby releases and agrees to
indemnify Impark with respect of any claims, actions, liabilities, penalties, costs and expenses
suffered by Impark arising out of the City’s failure to do so. This indemnity is limited to the
City’s taxing responsibilities under this Agreement and shall survive the expiration or earlier
termination of this Agreement. The Operator shall be responsible for its own parking and
Washington state sales taxes, if applicable, on revenues it retains under section 1.b). All other
taxes associated with its business operations are the sole responsibility of the respective parties.
2. Reporting. On or before the 15th day of each month, the Operator will give the City a
statements and performance reports for the preceding calendar month setting out all revenues
collected by the Operator as contemplated in paragraphs 1.b) for such month and the amount of
any permitted deductions (the "Statement") and will deposit the net revenue to the City’s bank
account. The Statement shall be deemed to be correct unless the City provides Operator with
written notice of any errors or omissions within ninety (90) days of the Statement date.
i.Monthly reporting will include at minimum: the number of enforcement hours
worked in the month by zone; the vacancy by lot including metered daily lots;
the numbers of permit holders by lot; the number of individuals on monthly
permit waitlists; daily parker metered usage by lot.
ii. Monthly parking lot permit reports should show monthly purchased permits
and terminations, monthly vacancy by permit type; monthly waitlist numbers
added and pulled from waitlist.
iii. Monthly reporting/statements should show revenue by meter, by pay phone
apps, or other online payment software, and by monthly permitted parking.
Equipment Maintenance Standards and Locations: Electronic Pay Stations or digital pay
stations equipment and software shall be maintained in accordance with the following standards:
1. No pay station will be out of service for more than 10 consecutive system operating hours for
lack of replacement part;
2. Units will be out of order no more than 1 % of system operating hours per year;
3. Each machine has a sixty day burn in period before standards apply;
4. The City has right to demand that a unit be replaced within one business day if unit
experiences system failure that cannot be corrected in field or exceeds average equipment
failure rate (1%) by 50%;
5. Less than 1% of receipt paper replenishment or coin collection notice shall result in
Page 17 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
machine being out of service;
6. Performance standards are related to performance while operating in temperature range
of -13 to 130 degrees (Fahrenheit) and 97% non-condensing humidity;
7. Access to associated operating systems, reporting and software per the manufacturer’s
standards and intent of operation.
Meter Locations by Lot
LOT 90 - Harborside KCC Number of Meters
Accepts
Cash Zone
Type
6 Yes Downtown Garage
LOT 91 - Washington Ave Meter Number Zone Type
2 Yes Downtown Garage
LOT 92 - Park Plaza Meter Number Zone Type
5 Yes Downtown Garage
*LOT 93 – 4TH & Warren Meter Number Zone Type
1 Yes SE On street
LOT 94 – 5th & Warren Meter Number Zone Type
1 No SE on-street
LOT 95 - 4th & Park - Meter Number Zone SE Type
1 Yes Off-street
*LOT 96 - Burwell & Warren Meter Number Zone Type
1 No SE Off-street
*LOT 97 -Chester & Gregory - Meter Number Zone Type
1 No SE on-street
*LOT 98 -5TH St. Meter Number Zone Type
1 No SE off-street
*LOT 99 - Venetta & 4th Meter Number Zone Type
0 No SE On-street
LOT 100 -4th & High Meter Number Zone Type
1 No SE On-street
Page 18 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
Enforcement Zones: Map
*East Zone extends to entire East Bremerton Annexed Area
*NW Zone encompasses Port Orchard Annexed Area
Page 19 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
EXHIBIT B: SCHEDULE
Effective 1/1/2026 through 12/31/2030
Downtown Core Enforcement:
3 times daily – Monday through Saturday Annual average of 160 hours per month*
Random Restricted Residential
Monthly through all residential enforcement zones Annual average of 120 hours per month*
On-Call – Customer Service Response
In all enforcement zones Annual Average of 40 hours per month*
Commuter Parking
All commuter impacted zones Annual Average of 160 hours per month*
*Minimum
City owned Lots*, Garages and Parks
Garages and Lots 1 daily timed enforcement Monday –
Saturday
Park Property Annual average of 60 hours per month
minimum
Meter Maintenance/collection Cash collections and maintenance at
minimum weekly
Vehicle Immobilization 15 hours minimum
All zones per Enforcement officer recommendation
Monday through Wednesday Annual Average of 120 hours per month
maximum
*Includes on street lots
Administrative services will be provided Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 am to 5
pm with customer service hours between 9 am and 4 pm.
Holiday schedule will follow the City of Bremerton recognized holidays
Page 20 of 20
Bremerton/[Imperial Parking Services]
[City of Bremerton Parking Enforcement and Management Services 2026-2030]
Rev. 04/2023
EXHIBIT C: RATES AND FEES TABLE
FLAT FEE MONITORING AND TICKETING
Enforcement fee types and rates Monthly Rate
Downtown core $7,520.00
Random restricted residential $5,637.70
East zone $1,146.00
On-call all zones $1,879.23
Commuter Parking $3,690.20
City owned garages $3,184.00
City owned lots and parks $2,748.00
Vehicle Immobilization $ 400.00
Total $26,205.13*
HOURLY ENFORCEMENT
Special Events $23.75/hour*
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Service Type Monthly Rate
Residential permits $1,200.00
Customer support $1,800.00
Monthly lot and garage permits
Revenue Remittance and Reporting
Meter management repairs and maintenance $100 per meter per month
Leased space reimbursement $1,600
Materials and supplies Cost Reimbursement basis
Estimated Total Monthly cost $32,805.13*assuming 20 meters
*Service Fee Adjustments: An annual increase will be applied to the rates in Section II. Scope of Requested Service and Service Fee. A and B.
Special Events, only. Starting in 2027, the increase shall be based on the Consumer Price Index-W change for Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton, All
Urban Consumers 1982-84 (CPI-U) as published by the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for June of the year of increase. The
annual increase factor will be limited by a cap of 8% in any given year.
Published for
September 10
Study Session
Responses
to Council Questions
Item A2
Jeff Coughlin
1.If enforcement in Downtown and other areas is only Mon-Sat, will we be updating signs
to reflect there is no 2-hour parking on Sunday for the signs that currently say 7 days per
week? Or if not, is it possible to have enforcement on Sundays as well?
o Answer: In the current contract the scheduled enforcement for the
downtown core is Monday through Saturday twice daily. However, random
and on-call enforcement is scheduled for Monday through Sunday
throughout the City. On Sundays the operator provides random
enforcement in the downtown core with a focus on safety violations. The
laws and time restrictions that are in place are in effect regardless of the
enforcement schedule. Any enforcement officer or police officer could
provide random enforcement in the downtown core 24/7 and enforce per the
signage as needed. The signage reflects this and is not directly tied to the
scheduled beats.
I believe consistency in laws, enforcement, and communication is key.
2.I want to check that the random residential zone enforcement section includes e.g.,
Lower Washington Ave? What is the current visitation rate in the current contract versus
this renewal?
o There is no change to the random enforcement of Lower Washington in
this contract versus the prior contract. Under both agreements they
received random and on-call enforcement. In the last year in this
location, we chalked and cited 53 vehicles YTD July 31, 2025. However
there has not been any citizen-initiated change to signage so we cannot
enforce on Saturdays and Sundays here.
3.From the latest monthly financial report available (May) of the budgeted 2025 parking
revenue ($2,058,000) only 33.06% had been recorded, which seems under projection. Is it
expected to meet projections with significantly increased revenue in summer or are we
looking at a shortfall compared to projection for the year? What is the breakdown in parking
revenue from parking tickets (Impark) versus garage fees and other sources?
o Answer: The parking revenue number referenced: $2,058,000 is the gross
revenue for the parking fund. And I believe we are on track to meet this
budget. I pulled our 7-13-2025 Revenue report which I have attached and
see that we’ve receipted (in enforcement) 47.97% of our expect infraction
budget by 6/30/2025. And in Garage and Lot revenue we’ve receipted 46%
of annual revenue by 6/30/2053; However our long term lease has an
outstanding accounts received and we’ve only collected in 28% as of
6/30/2025. I do have the breakdown of the revenue by category for you
attached. I also pulled the last three years of revenue reports as of
6/30/2025 and have the last three (3) year comparision of the 06/30
revenue receipts for comparision. For example, in 2023 at this same YTD
we have receipted in only 25%, in 2024 we had receipted in 46.01%.
o I expect we will make our projections for 2025 in revenue with the
possibility of our on-street lots which were impacted by construction this
year.
4. Has any study been done on increasing parking enforcement versus the increased cost
and revenue? E.g., how did we settle on this particular level of enforcement that we are
paying for?
o No study has been completed. In 2017 there were recommendations
that this should be improved so in 2019 – 2020 we rolled out the new
systems. In 2022, we further increased efficiency by adding a two (2)
enforcement vehicles for the residential areas and one (1) dedicated
vehicle for the downtown core zone. I have included a summary of the
enforcement levels and hours dedicated to these areas and I have
visuals for you see the areas of enforcement.
The current Enforcement levels:
Downtown Core- This area receives enforcement twice daily
Monday through Saturday and Sundays receives random patrols
with a focus on safety violations.
Commuter zones (SE and SW Zone) receives daily enforcement
Monday through Friday. Both the NW and NE residential zones
have commuter overflow impacts and we have additional
enforcements provided several times a week in these zones for
that reason.
In the East Zone on a bi-weekly basis with a focus on safety
violations.
Random patrols throughout the City residential areas on an
annual basis this include the NW Zone, NE Zone, the SW zone and
the SE zone the parks and city owned lots and garages.
On-call response – response to citizen requests through all zones
Monday through Friday and with a Monday response – result in
Cartegraph request no. We do not have a guaranteed same day
response but we do respond within 72 hours.
5. I would like a discussion of the proposed increase by business owners and others to
3 or 4 hours instead of the 2 currently in the Downtown core and how that proposed
change would affect the contract before signing a new five-year contract. This ties
into the 2017 Parking Study recommendation to "Create a park-once strategy for
Downtown."
a. This change would not impact the contract. If implemented at the City’s
discretion and the current contract would allow for twice daily
enforcement of these areas. This means that free 3-hour parking
between 5 am and 5 pm would be enforced upon if they did not move
during the second 3 hour block and the same would apply to free 4 hour
parking.
6. Should there be a revisit of creating new residential permit-only parking zones (e.g.,
as was brought forth for Lower Washington Ave), as recommended by both the JCTP
and the 2017 Parking Study, can this contract accommodate that?
a. That is a City Council and administrative decision - I recommend setting
time apart for this discussion. This contract does accommodate that
need if it was approved. I have the break down of the Minimum contract
hours under this agreement – if we found these still were not enough we
can open the contract up for amendment at anytime.
Required enforcement minimums per the contract
Amend. 7
Associated
Zones
Required enforcement minimums per new renewal
Associated Zones
Hours Enforcement type Hours Enforcement type
1920 Downtown Core enforcement DT Core 1920 downtown core enforcement DT Core
1440 Random on-call residential All zones 1440 random on-call residential All zones
960 East zone enforcement East 1440 East zone enforcement East
480 On-call response All zones 480 On-call response All zones
1920 Commuter parking enforcement
SE, SW, NE*,
NW* 1920 commuter parking enforcement
SE, SW, NE*,
NW*
720 City owned off streets lots garages and parks 720 city owned off streets lots garages and parks
City owned
property
7440 total 180 Vehicle Immobilization
8100 total
7. How does this contract meet any other recommendations of the JCTP, 2017 Parking
Study, and any other relevant planning documents?
a. This contract includes two ALPR enable vehicles, the use of third-party
software payment providers (i.e.. Paybyphone others) and includes the
issuance of residential parking permits throughout the City. It also
include dedicated time for booting responses.
The City has set up the parking program to implement the next set of
recommendations in the JCTP in two primary ways: first, by rolling out 2
vehicles for enforcement including 1 EV ALPR vehicle for the Residential
zone and adding the downtown core Go -4 ALPR vehicle. Secondly, by
adding the ALPR systems in two of the vehicles (we would like to add LPR
to a third vehicle in the future) and updating the enforcement software
there is enough capacity in the system to implement the enforcement of
the expanded Residential Parking Zones and to address paid on-street
parking recommendations in JTCP item PM15. This contract allows for
this and does not limit or define the maximum number of enforcement
officers we could add to the enforcement. We could easily add another
enforcement officer and handheld without changing this agreement.
Many of the JCTP recommendations are administrative actions and this
contract stands ready to support any implementation of this actions.
Some examples of possible near term actions:
Back up parking – or event parking
Residential only parking permits
Expanded Residential parking permit zones (resident only or time
limited).
Expansion of Smart Commuter stalls in the City owned stalls and lots
On-street paid parking
Anna Mockler
• The contract seems heavily tilted in favor of East Bremerton and downtown. My
district has longstanding parking problems: vehicles that block access, others that
act as nuisance properties parked on the public street. We deserve equal levels of
enforcement.
1. Why is East Bremerton a separate area? You explained last week that this was
because it had so many parks. On reflection, I can’t see why many parks would
lead to more enforcement needs.
a. East side had no enforcement prior to 2021 – but the demand we
received and our regular visits to this area prompted the change. It is
a high density area with potential for commuter impacts and growing
density. I have comparision of the East Side enforcement area -these
are minimums and the NW and SW zones so you can see what is
provided.
b. I have our 2025 YTD through July 2025 cites by zone below
Row Labels
Count of Citation
ID
DOWNTOWN 3400
NE 961
NW 917
SE 1416
SW 382
EAST 227
Grand Total 7303
And our 2024 citations had the following distribution by zone
Row Labels
Count of Citation
ID
DOWNTOWN 7536
NE 2021
NW 2121
SW 976
EAST 742
SE 2610
Grand Total 16,006
2.When was the change made to add E Bremerton as a separate area? April 2023
3.How effective has it been, compared to other zones and to the former policy to
survey the whole city randomly? The random patrol for the residential zones
is not new and is a standard in enforcement as a means of keeping people
honest. If we notify them of our scheduled enforcements they plan around
this we have found.
4.My district, however, has long complained of insufficient attention from Impark.
We have vehicles of every description parked for long periods, many derelict,
unregistered, or active trading centers for goods & services.
I hope sharing numbers above helps you to see how we do enforce in
your district. We are on schedule to issue 2,254 citations across the
SW and NW Zone in 2025 with a YTD number of 110 for expired vehicle
registration and I have asked for more of a focus on in abandoned and
operable vehicles in 2026.
5.For years, a large truck in the alley between Lafayette and Cambrian, just south
of 15th St., has prevented Waste Mgmt. from picking up in the alley. Multiple
times. Code Enforcement has reported that they’ve visited the address multiple
times.
a.Parking Enforcement also visited this location many times and provided
many responses to this area. The vehicle in mention was having issues
with the alley for because it was over 33 feet. It was a commercial sized
vehicle parked in a residential neighborhood. While they were legally
parking it on private property it was not made for the small back alley and
we did not have this same complaint from non-commercial vehicles in this
alley. We visited many times and found violations against inoperable
vehicles, expired vehicle registrations, parked facing traffic and parking a
recreation vehicle boat trailer.
I don’t want better treatment for District Six. I just want the same treatment given to
residents of Pennsylvania between 6th St and 11th St., for instance, where I have yet to see
any of the above problems. Restore random routes!
I hope sharing numbers above helps you to see how we do enforce in your district. In
regards to responding to parking enforcement across the City however, we respond to
parking needs and provide service in the following ways:
1)Planned enforcement beats in commuter impacted zones and high traffic
volume commercial districts. We do this in the Downtown core, the parks, and
the commuter impacted residential zones.
2)Random patrols- with a focus on safety violation types
3)Citizen requests
Mid Year Budget Amendment YTD Receipts thru 6/30/23 Remaining Budget % Collected Revenue Budget Receipts Collected YTD 6/30/24 Remaining Budget % Collected YTD 2025 Rev Budget Receipts Collected YTD 6//30/25 Remaining budget % Collected YTD353.7000 OTHER NON-TRAFFIC INFRACT$0.00$0.00$0.000%- - $0.00354.0000PARKING INFRACTIONS $400,000.00$98,402.61$301,597.3925%410,000.00 188,640.80 $221,359.2046.01%435,000208,672226,32847.97%359.0000 FINES AND PENALTIES $500.00$0.00$500.000%500.00 - $500.000.00%50015834231.61%361.1100 INVESTMENT EARNINGS $5,000.00$10,557.97($5,557.97)211%18,000.00 6,469.93 $11,530.0735.94%18,0008,1689,83245.38%361.3200 UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) $0.00$0.00$0.000%- - $0.000361.4000 INTEREST ON RECEIVABLES $4,078.00$0.00$4,078.000%- - $0.000362.2001 4TH & WASHINGTON GARAGE $230,000.00$99,409.86$130,590.1443%260,433.00 139,059.18 $121,373.8253.40%260,000111,772148,22842.99%362.2003 ON STREET PARKING DAILY $227,600.00$75,732.04$151,867.9633%247,489.00 75,541.96 $171,947.0430.52%250,00075,847174,15330.34%362.2005 OFF STREET PARKING DAILY $200,000.00$87,398.28$112,601.7244%215,413.00 114,603.15 $100,809.8553.20%215,000138,39276,60864.37%362.2006 CONFERENCE CENTER GARAGE $517,000.00$213,189.94$303,810.0641%544,758.00 209,406.22 $335,351.7838.44%550,000256,114293,88646.57%362.2007 RESIDENTIAL PRK PERMITS $1,000.00$1,077.25($77.25)108%2,500.00 880.00 $1,620.0035.20%2,5002002,3008.00%362.2008 PARK PLAZA GARAGE $257,000.00$110,564.37$146,435.6343%272,765.00 107,793.81 $164,971.1939.52%275,000124,214150,78645.17%362.2020 L.T. FACILITY LEASE$50,000.00$23,378.21$26,621.7947%50,000.00 21,844.06 $28,155.9443.69%50,00014,44535,55528.89%369.2000 UNCLAIMED ASSETS $0.00($5.00)$5.000%- - $0.000369.4000 JUDGEMENTS AND SETTLEMENT$500.00$0.00$500.000%- - $0.000369.8100 CASH OVER AND SHORT $0.00$8.25($8.25)0%- - $0.000369.9100 OTHER MISCELLEOUS REVENUE$0.00$31.61($31.61)0%- 57.04 ($57.04)0389.0000 OTHER NONREVENUE $4,000.00$1,008.05$2,991.9525%2,000.00 1,113.00 $887.0055.65%2,00002,0000.00%$1,896,678.00$720,753.44 $1,175,924.5638%2,023,858.00 865,409.15 $1,158,448.8542.76%2,058,000937,9821,120,01845.58%$1,896,678.00$720,753.44 $1,175,924.5638%2,023,858.00 833,489.19 $1,158,448.8541.18%2,058,000937,9821,120,01845.58%105 43PARKING SYSTEM 43 105 2025-2026 Revenue Budget202320242025
1 month – 1 vehicle in the NE Zone 6-1-2025 to 6-30-2025
1 month – DT core – in the Go-4 June 2025
1 month -1 vehicle in the NW Zone
1 month 1 vehicle SE Zone
1 month – 1 vehicle in the SW Zone
September 2025
Opioid Settlements
8A
September 2025 Opioid Settlements
Settlements with Purdue Phrama/Sacklers, Algoven, Amneal, Aptex, Hikma, Indivior, Mylan,
Sun, Zydus
The total settlement amount to the State of Washington would be approximately $122.2M.
The State and local governments will split most of that amount 50/50.
Total settlement amount to the City would be approximately $315,000.
Payments would occur over a 15-year period. Each payment would not be identical and
would vary from year to year.
Purdue Pharma/Sackler Settlement
This is part of a bankruptcy.
Payments from Purdue Pharma and Sackler family members
6.5B from Sackler Family
900M from Purdue Phama which will be liquidated.
City will get approximately $278,000
Secondary Manufacturers Settlement
There are 8 secondary manufacturers involved in this settlement.
Algoven, Amneal, Aptex, Hikma, Indivior, Mylan, Sun, Zydus
Total Payments from 8 manufacturers will be approximately $618.8M
City will get approximately $37,000
•Algoven –$18.6M •Indivior –$38M
•Amneal –$71.7M •Mylan –$284.4M
•Aptex –$36.6M •Sun –$31.6M
•Hikma –$95.8M •Zydus –$14.8M
Settlement
Amount
The actual amount the City receives is dependent on
participation from other entities.
The number of participating local governments in Washington impacts the amount of the actual
payments.
Each settlement has various incentives built in which
will increase payments given the number of participating Washington local governments.
The State has previously been able get full local
government participation in other opioid settlement.
As of September 5, 84 of 129 local governments have signed on to the Purdue Pharma/Sackler Settlement
As of September 5, 65 of 129 local governments have signed on to the Secondary Manufacturers settlement.
Additional
Information
Per the OneWashington MOU, there will be a maximum
15% attorney fees.
Some of the settlements contain Narcan kits for the
State.
The State can choose to convert the kits into a cash
payment. The State has full control to distribute the
kits as it sees fit. If converted to cash, the local
governments will not receive a 50% share.
The Settlements contain provisions limiting the entities'
ability to market and promote the opioids in the future.
Uses of money
Must be used for opioid abatement
Treatment/Recovery
Support Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Support People in Treatment and Recovery
Connections to Care
Address Needs of Criminal Justice Involved Persons
Address Needs of Pregnant or Parenting Women and Their Families Including Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
Prevention
Prevent Overprescribing and Ensure Appropriate Prescribing and Dispensing of Opioids
Prevent Misuse of Opioids
Prevent Overdose Deaths and Other Harms
Other
First Responder Training and Support
Leadership Planning and Coordination
Training
Research
Published for
September 3
Council Meeting
Mayor’s Report
Item 3
MAYOR’S REPORT
September 17, 2025
Cascade Trail Stormwater System and Paving
•There was no previous stormwater system and installation of a new system fixes a
decades old problem of excess runoff on the road and winter ice issues
•City staff installed 590 feet of stormwater main, 5 catch basins and manholes, new ring
and lid assemblies
•Work included repairing areas of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and replacing a failed
road surface
•Total project cost: $142,000
•Project was completed last week on Sept. 11
City of Bremerton Poet Laureate Update
Since her appointment earlier this year as Poet Laureate, Sarah
Steinke has been working on a number of initiatives to promote
poetry and the arts in the City:
•She launched and is steadily growing a monthly online mini-
workshop series to support poetry participation in the
community
•She is actively cultivating partnerships to bring poetry to
classrooms and businesses to build opportunities for
engagement
•Her contributions have also been highlighted at key civic and
cultural events. She created original poems for both the
City’s Arbor Day celebration in April and the recent Fall for
the Arts Art Gala & Auction to celebrate artists and the arts
•These efforts continue to promote community connections,
raise the visibility of the arts, and expand creative
engagement across the city
Haddon Park Shade Tree Planting
•City staff are putting finishing touches on the Haddon Park Renovation project --
today we began planting new trees in the park
•Tree species were selected for their resilience, adaptability to urban and changing
environments, resistance to disease, and shade cover, as recommended in the
Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan
Pin Oak, Quercus palustris
Forest Green Oak, Quercus frainetto 'Schmidt'
Published for
September 17
Council Meeting
Public Recognition
Item 5
From: Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2025 12:30 PM
To: Greg Wheeler <greg.wheeler@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; City Council
<City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Legal <legal@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Brett Jette
<Brett.Jette@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Lindsey Victor <Lindsey.Victor@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; City Clerk
<city.clerk@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Cc: paralegal312@gmail.com; Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>;
kimmysiebens@yahoo.com; Robin Weldin <rdmoley26@gmail.com>
Subject: Public Awareness Was Intentionally Constricted As To $400K Settlement Of Redal v. Bremerton
Sect. 1983 Civil Rights Action / Public Record Requests
9-12-25
To: Mayor, City Council, City Attorney / News Media
Re:
Redal v. Wolf, Bremerton et al. $400K Settlement Of Sect.
1983 Civil Rights Act Police Brutality Suit
New Open Hearing Should Be Convened / Settlement
Release Should Contain No Confidentiality Terms Given City
Policy Of Harassment & Persecution Of Homeless
Kindly accept this submittal as my demand, and as my
Public Recognition comment for the City Council hearing of
September 17, 2025.
We request of the mayor and Council that a full public
hearing be noticed, and full public participation be allowed
on the question of the city's $400,000 "settlement and
release" of Mr. Redal's Section 1983 Civil Right Act claim
against the city. This is especially needed if the mayor will be
signing terms imposing secrecy or non-disclosure in this
matter.
In the attached email, I questioned and objected to the way
the city kept the public in the dark about the executive
session belatedly added to the agenda for the Study
Session.
The city placed the Redal v. Wolf, Bremerton et al. executive
session within a Study Session - accessible only online with
not even minimal material information on the agenda which
would inform the public to be able to decide whether they
should become further informed or not, participate or not.
The Council's rule about 24 hour prior permission would by
itself dissuade members of the public from participating in
the post-session public commenting. And even those who
watched and waited for the end of that session would have
zero idea what it could be about. Only Kimmy Siebens and
myself waited and commented. I had no idea what to expect
post session. See:
"9-10-25 Exec Session: City's $400K Settlement Of Sect.
1983 Civil Rights Act Police Brutality Suit"
https://youtu.be/lHM_vQYP-2Q
There has been a continuing abusive use of the stated
charge of "Violation: BMC 9.32.020 - Unauthorized
Camping."
against houseless people here. It has been the position and
testimony of Friends of Smith Cove and Rock The Block that
the police are being used to persecute the homeless, and
even what Councilmember Rebelowski incredibly calls our
"social services," Commonstreet, is part of the system of
persecution since it is being used as a way to tighten the
noose around the homeless to activate police misconduct,
as well as for propaganda. See:
"Snow Job Study Session: 'Homeless Outreach;' Per
'Validated' CommonStreet, Police Are 'Exceptional.'"
https://youtu.be/XQeExMky2DU (e.g.,Trusha Munson's "the
police are exceptional" testimony).
The systemic cruelty against the homeless is such an
accepted baseline that the last Councilmember we would
have believed was part of this, is in fact part of the city's
embrace of such persecution which includes crafting cover
stories to conceal the ill motive. See:
"Mockler: Soak The Homeless & Say Its Conservation /
Goodnow: Turning Hoses On People Is A Bad Look"
https://youtu.be/kC_BEduxCXE (see also the acceptance of
classifying the homeless as "criminal vagrants" for the sin of
not accepting non-existent or ill-suited services).
Bremerton's municipal government uses deceit-as-policy
and even when confronted with this in Council's chambers
during its formal proceedings, deceit is again resorted to by
Councilmembers without being halted or stricken. See:
"Mockler's Non-Apology Side-Steps Deceit Of Her Park
Proposal: Invoke Conservation To Harass Homeless"
https://youtu.be/AHADbRGnNDE (i.e., Mockler's "the parks
are watered with the sprinklers; it's not a deterrent thing").
A city expenditure of $400K is by itself worthy of public
scrutiny. But this expenditure as a result of a police beating
resulting in facial reconstruction surgery and permanent
bodily injury demands public scrutiny. See:
Justia "Redal v. Merritt et al, No. 3:2023cv05782 -
Document 40 (W.D. Wash. 2024)."
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-
courts/washington/wawdce/3:2023cv05782/325902/40/
allegations of police misconduct
Under the circumstances of current abuse and persecution
of Bremerton's unhoused population, the Redal matter
should be open and discussed by more than two members
of the public online who had no idea what to expect during
and after the executive session, and did not have the
opportunity to read the terms of the settlement and release.
In addition to a new adequate hearing on the Redal matter,
we request:
Public Record Act Request
With reference to the above concerns in the Redal matter
and as to the city's active marginalization and
persecution of the homeless, we request pursuant to the
Public Records Act:
1. All terms offered by each party in the Redal
settlement and release.
2. The documents Council possessed during said
executive session, including any such
documents signed or to be signed by the mayor.
3. All city materials filed in the Redal litigation,
including materials disclosing police policy and
conduct; pleadings, filed discovery, and
depositions; declarations and affidavits by the
mayor and police officers.
(Mr. Redal's medical and other healthcare
information is excluded in this request).
With reference to our well-known demands for
24/7 public bathrooms, and as to the city's
active marginalization and persecution of the
homeless, we request pursuant to the Public
Records Act:
4. All materials submitted to the Dept. of Ecology
for its approval / review of the city's Wastewater
Comprehensive Plan Update.
5. All evidence, including emails, other
communications, memos, etc., that the March
5, 2025 comments regarding the Wastewater
Comprehensive Plan Update of Jose Camacho,
Robin Weldin, Friends of Smith Cove, Rock The
Block, Dr. Naomi Levine, and Mary Lou Long, and
city response(s) thereto, were submitted to the
Dept. of Ecology for its approval / review of the
city's Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update.
For the city's reference those March 5, 2025 Wastewater
comments were:
My comment
https://youtu.be/c0B8InZb1Xo?si=SLXaPxlt0T6FD5Ko
Robin Weldin's comment
https://youtu.be/GqmD7MMHcZY?si=VUE7Up5bhKkrsPbR
Dr. Naomi Levine's comment & City Response Thereto
https://youtu.be/BEmZXQz95Jo?si=TXdSq6J48PAjy8xl
Councilmember Anna Mockler also commented on
the Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update on March 5,
2025.
Thank you
--
Friends of Smith Cove in Evergreen Park
Jose Camacho
https://www.youtube.com/@FriendsofSmithCove
Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>
Tomorrow's Executive Session - Public Comment / Open Meetings Act Or Due
Process Violation
4 messages
Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 5:10 PM
To: Jane.Rebelowski@ci.bremerton.wa.us, City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
Open Meetings Act Violation
I have looked at the agenda for tomorrow at:
https://meetings.municode.com/d/f?u=https://mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/
brem-pubu/MEET-Packet-17f7d96aaac443768714244e778d3d
83.pdf&n=AgendaPacket-Study%20Session-September%2010,%
202025%205.00%20PM.pdf
"Item C.1. Executive Session - Item added" keeps the public in the dark.
What "pending litigation" will be discussed tomorrow by Council in which "public
comments will be accepted?"
The public has a right to be informed about matters before the Council and to be
discussed by the Council with enough information so as to intelligently inform us for
meaningful participation.
--
Friends of Smith Cove in Evergreen Park
https://www.youtube.com/@FriendsofSmithCove
Our text-only # is 360-488-9903 for tips and news re development projects, complaints re environmental violations,
government transparency, accountability, corruption. Requests for anonymity will be honored to the fullest extent of law.
Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 5:29 PM
To: kimmysiebens@yahoo.com
Friends of Smith Cove in Evergreen Park
https://www.youtube.com/@FriendsofSmithCove
9/12/25, 12:26 AM Gmail - Tomorrow's Executive Session - Public Comment / Open Meetings Act Or Due Process Violation
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=784759e165&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8837192597206160970&simpl=msg-a:r-77349199893801…1/5
Our text-only # is 360-488-9903 for tips and news re development projects, complaints re environmental violations,
government transparency, accountability, corruption. Requests for anonymity will be honored to the fullest extent of law.
[Quoted text hidden]
City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 2:14 PM
To: Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>
Cc: Jane Rebelowski <Jane.Rebelowski@ci.bremerton.wa.us>, City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Thank you for your message regarding tonight’s agenda. I want to assure you that the City Council follows the
requirements of Washington’s Open Public Meetings Act (Chapter 42.30 RCW) when entering executive session.
Specifically, RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) authorizes a governing body to hold an executive session:
“…to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency matters relating to agency enforcement actions, or to discuss
with legal counsel representing the agency litigation or potential litigation to which the agency, the governing body, or a
member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become, a party, when public knowledge regarding the discussion is
likely to result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency.”
Executive sessions under this provision are limited in scope and may only be used for the purposes allowed by law. No
final action may be taken in executive session. If Council were to take any action related to litigation, that would occur in
the public portion of a meeting and the public would have an opportunity to provide public comment on the proposed
action. The Council is required to vote in public if acting after an executive session.
We appreciate your close attention to these issues, and the Council shares your commitment to open and transparent
government.
Warmly,
Anne
Anne L. Williams
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
345 6th Street, Suite 100
Bremerton, WA 98337-1873
anne.williams@ci.bremerton.wa.us
(360) 473-5280
www.BremertonWA.gov
CLICK HERE to subscribe to email notifications for newly available meeting documents.
9/12/25, 12:26 AM Gmail - Tomorrow's Executive Session - Public Comment / Open Meetings Act Or Due Process Violation
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=784759e165&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8837192597206160970&simpl=msg-a:r-77349199893801…2/5
For a quick response to non-emergency issues like potholes, graffiti, or streetlight outages, contact Bremerton 1 by
phone (360) 473-5920, or email Bremerton1@ci.bremerton.wa.us.
NOTE: Please be advised the City of Bremerton is required to comply with the Public Records Act Chapter
42.56 RCW. This act establishes a strong state mandate in favor of disclosure of public records. As such,
the information you submit to the City, including personal information, may ultimately be subject to
disclosure as a public record.
From: Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2025 5:11 PM
To: Jane Rebelowski <Jane.Rebelowski@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Tomorrow's Executive Session - Public Comment / Open Meetings Act Or Due Process Violation
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize
the sender and know the content is safe.
Open Meetings Act Violation
I have looked at the agenda for tomorrow at:
https://meetings.municode.com/d/f?u=https://mccmeetings.
blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/brem-pubu/MEET-Packet-
17f7d96aaac443768714244e778d3d83.pdf&n=AgendaPacket-
Study%20Session-September%2010,%
202025%205.00%20PM.pdf
"Item C.1. Executive Session - Item added" keeps the public in
the dark.
9/12/25, 12:26 AM Gmail - Tomorrow's Executive Session - Public Comment / Open Meetings Act Or Due Process Violation
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=784759e165&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8837192597206160970&simpl=msg-a:r-77349199893801…3/5
What "pending litigation" will be discussed tomorrow by Council in
which "public comments will be accepted?"
The public has a right to be informed about matters before the
Council and to be discussed by the Council with enough
information so as to intelligently inform us for meaningful
participation.
[Quoted text hidden]
Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 2:59 PM
To: anne.williams@ci.bremerton.wa.us
I appreciate the response and explanation Anne. I follow the reasoning of an executive
session under the OPMA up to a point.
My concerns:
1. Council has a rule in place that the public cannot comment over Zoom or phone
without first obtaining city approval 24 hours in advance of a hearing. This city rule
actually does violate the Open Public Meetings Act because it is impermissibly stricter
than the Act - which must be construed liberally.
2. The public is alerted to the need to comment by advance notice - an agenda - with
some indication of the subject of the hearing / vote. The agenda description "pending
litigation" is too vague to put us on notice with sufficient time to prepare or digest
information to meaningfully comment. "Pending litigation" could be pending labor
litigation, or pending civil rights litigation, or pending election litigation, etc. The OPMA
provision for executive sessions cloisters "public discussion" inside the session; I don't
think it is foreclosing some description beyond pending litigation.
3. Council does not engage in interactive back and forth with residents who may have
questions on a matter presented at hearing, and in this case the public will literally be
learning that matter right that second.
[Quoted text hidden]
9/12/25, 12:26 AM Gmail - Tomorrow's Executive Session - Public Comment / Open Meetings Act Or Due Process Violation
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=784759e165&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8837192597206160970&simpl=msg-a:r-77349199893801…4/5
Virus-free.www.avast.com
9/12/25, 12:26 AM Gmail - Tomorrow's Executive Session - Public Comment / Open Meetings Act Or Due Process Violation
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=784759e165&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-8837192597206160970&simpl=msg-a:r-77349199893801…5/5
From: Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 7:05 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; david.nelson@kitsapsun.com;
marianm@realchangenews.org; whitney@investigatewest.org; editor@thestranger.com;
kimmysiebens@yahoo.com
Subject: Submitting Comment For City Council Public Recognition 9-17-25
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments
unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Attached is my Public Recognition Comment for today's City
Council hearing (9-17-25). Please make it part of the record.
It's time City Council re-acquaints itself with accountability.
--
Friends of Smith Cove in Evergreen Park
Jose Camacho
https://www.youtube.com/@FriendsofSmithCove
Virus-free.www.avast.com
From: Friendsof Smith Cove <friendsofsmithcove@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 2:08 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Cc: kimmysiebens@yahoo.com; Robin Weldin <rdmoley26@gmail.com>; paralegal312@gmail.com
Subject: Public Recognition Comment For Tomorrow: Bremerton's Government Deceit-As-Policy
Includes Misrepresenting / Omitting Law To The Public & This Is Deployed To Harm Our Unhoused
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments
unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
9-16-25
Public Recognition Comment: City's Deceit-As-Policy
Bremerton's Government's Deceit-As-Policy Includes
Misrepresenting / Omitting Law To The Public & This Is
Deployed To Harm Our Unhoused
To: City Council
I am submitting this as my Public Recognition comment for
tomorrow's City Council hearing. Please include the
attachments as part of this comment.
If this falls on deaf ears to those currently on Council,
perhaps one day it won't. We need a culture of integrity at
the Norm Dicks. Not deceit-as-policy. Our homeless need
your help. You are law-makers and you can make law
requiring 24/7 public restrooms. And not just in a ghetto to
keep them away from the bright shiny surfaces of your
developer cartel masters.
Our government cannot lie to or deceive us. Bremerton does
it to such a pervasive extent it is violating our Constitutional
civil rights and obstructing our ability to be meaningfully
informed of public processes so that we may
intelligently give input to the decision-making processes
intended to fulfill representative governance.
As you all know by now - but have chosen to cover up -
Director Andrea Spencer's tightly run Department of
Community Development is a honed tool for corruption
inuring to benefit the top dog realty / developer in town -
most prominently, "Sound West Group." After Jack
Paauw's (and Mike Miller's) installation into the Planning
Commission, this crony network for the wealth and
connected (see "4th Street Action Group") is effectively a
cartel. Uncovering this starting with the DCD-rigged
Evergreen Pointe project was my introduction to the
supposedly finest citizens in Bremerton.
Unchecked commercial ventures only become more
mendacious over times. And because city agents are not in
bed with these ventures, they have embraced deceit, lying,
and concealment in dealing with the public. The cartel's
takeover here has tainted our city's public processes in
many ways. One way is the routine infusion of DCD
presentations and municipal proceedings with lies,
deception, and calculated omission. The public is thereby
manipulated and democratic processes subverted. This has
been used to erase law developers consider obstacles to
their private pecuniary enrichment.
Our government cannot lie to or deceive us. Our
transparency statutes are to ensure democracy and they
state these principles clearly as being in aid of actual
democracy.
Public Records Act RCW 42.56.030
"The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the
agencies that serve them. The people, in delegating
authority, do not give their public servants the right to
decide what is good for the people to know and what is
not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining
informed so that they may maintain control over the
instruments that they have created."
Open Public Meetings Act RCW 42.30.010
"The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the
agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating
authority, do not give their public servants the right to
decide what is good for the people to know and what is
not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining
informed and informing the people's public servants of their
views so that they may retain control over the instruments
they have created."
These statutorily expressed ideals did not arise out of a
vacuum. Our Supreme Court has long held that our First
Amendment right not only gives us protected speech, but
imposes a duty upon government to ensure the free and full
flow of knowledge and information from the government to
the people. Our First Amendment right to freedom of
expression is not separable from the First Amendment right
to information from the City of Bremerton. INFORMATION -
not disinformation, and certainly not the purposeful
manipulative omission of information REGARDING LAW:
* The right to receive information is the fundamental
counterpart of the right of free speech; it ensures the
public’s right to receive information in an open society. Fritz
v. Gorton, 83 Wash. 2d 275 (1974). Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S.
374 (1967).
* The "Constitution protects the right to receive information
and ideas." Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969).
* The "State may not ... contract the spectrum of available
knowledge." Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
* The First Amendment "prohibit[s] government from limiting
the stock of information from which members of the public
may draw." First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S.
765 (1978); Board of Ed., Island Trees Union v. Pico, 457 U.S.
853 (1982).
These tenets are not just feel-good aspirations; they are
Constitutional mandates. They are important enough that
Washington has a statute well over a century old:
RCW 42.20.040 False report.
"Every public officer who shall knowingly make any false
or misleading statement in any official report or
statement, under circumstances not otherwise
prohibited by law, shall be guilty of a gross
misdemeanor."
Bremerton has become accustomed to evading this
necessary body of truth-sustaining law.
For example, Andrea Spencer's first rigging of the Evergreen
Pointe project is objectively obvious simply by looking at the
law, and looking at her decision-making as evidenced by
DCD's written analyses and decisions. The decision-making
- a sham - was outside of the state law's framing. Spencer
simply decided to ignore the law requiring the use of a
variance procedure and criteria to allow Goldburg's initial
iteration of the E.P. project a height well past the admitted
35-foot height limit. She instead used a "conditional use"
veneer made up for the purpose of deceiving the public her
agency was acting in good faith.
And yet, Bremerton - city administration, City Council, and
Planning Commission - has allowed Spencer and her
corrupted mendacious agency to continue to wreak havoc
on law and process decades later. It has simply decided not
only to misrepresent state shoreline and environmental law,
but to effectively nullify and erase it - particularly the
Shoreline Management Act. This erasure inures to the
benefit of the developers who have a monopoly here (as
we've see in the Evergreen Pointe project).
"Map E & Interrupted Buffer = E.P. Project. Each Violates
RCW 90.58.020, But DCD Evades On 6-17-
24." https://youtu.be/xQhlt8DHaYU
"DCD Cons Us, Erases Shoreline Management Act, &
Never Discloses E.P. Project's 35-Foot Height
Limit" https://youtu.be/qqTznzYA9G4
This is evidence of the raw power, influence, and dominance
of the developers' cartel over our elected and appointed
public officers - some of whom are literally directors and
partners in cartel ventures such. See Jack Paauw and
Denise Frey's constant fawning over all things Sound West.
Another example of casual deceit is the recent disgrace of
Councilmember Anna Mockler - caught in the act of
proposing a deceptive cover story of water conservation to
promulgate harassment of the homeless out of public parks.
"Mockler: Soak The Homeless & Say Its Conservation /
Goodnow: Turning Hoses On People Is A Bad
Look" https://youtu.be/kC_BEduxCXE (Public Safety
Committee 8-7-25)
"Mockler's Non-Apology Side-Steps Deceit Of Her Park
Proposal: Invoke Conservation To Harass
Homeless" https://youtu.be/AHADbRGnNDE (City Council
hearing 8-20-25)
Another example of deceit-as-policy in action is the Study
Session preceding the Mockler disgrace in which she, and
other Councilmembers, are seen using this public process
to mount a PR stagecraft intended to depict Commonstreet
as a successful "social services" aid to the homeless, and
the Council as a caring body concerned with the
demographic they want to disappear. This PR effort was
mounted after public outcry over the city's heist of CDBG
funds intended for the needy homeless and low-income to
enrich Sound West Group and its cronies.
"Snow Job Study Session: 'Homeless Outreach;' Per
'Validated' CommonStreet, Police Are
'Exceptional.'" https://youtu.be/XQeExMky2DU (July 2025)
Viewing the August 7, 2025 Public Safety Committee
deliberations which captured for all time the attempted
creation of a deceptive ploy as part of a proposal to harass
and ghettoize the homeless out of our parks, one sees
through the snow job Study Session in which the
Commonstreet contractor tells Council what it wants to
hear. In the Public Safety exchange, we see Ms. Munson's
reality-bending "the police are exceptional" (Joseph Redal
might disagree), and we see Tom Wolf extol Commonstreet
as a tool through which the homeless are marked as
refusing services so that police can brand them "criminal
vagrants" to then "tighten" the targeting of their punitive
persecution against the homeless.
How Deceit-As-Policy Covers Up The Fact That
Councilmembers Do Not Want Public Bathrooms For The
Homeless Despite Their Pretense
Council insists it is not depraved. It insists it really really
cares. And yet, the most minimal nod towards the idea that
the homeless might actually be human, might actually be a
mom and her kids on the street, might actually be someone
trying to hold onto to his or her dignity to fight through
another day - a 24/7 public restroom - somehow seems
beyond the reach of our very very caring compassionate
Councilmembers. It is almost as if they were not law-makers
but were in thrall to some mysterious force. Meanwhile,
years pass and city policy has hardened into more deceit-
as-policy.
"5-16-18 Younger: It's Frustrating To Listen To Pleas Of
The Homeless But 'We're Actively
Engaged.'" https://youtu.be/Y6_SAd6SDLw
"Camping Ordinance for MLK Way (Clip) - Denise
Frey" https://youtu.be/81PUWg85u6A (June 2023)
“Before we get any more aggressive … we better know what
we’re doing as far as providing adequate support."
Councilmember Frey expressed concern over how it looks to
ready persecution against the homeless without addressing
the UN human right of sanitation for the poorest of the
poor.Here, our local Chamber of Commerce influencer at
Norm Dicks starts the Council trend of avoiding its duty.
Understanding what it says about character, Frey prepares a
cover story much as Anna Mockler recently has - despite the
$10K allocation for portable toilets they had not yet been
installed on MLK Way. The light bulb turns on: "This is for the
administration. Fix it!" Frey demands while blaming the
branch of government which does not make law.
The back drop can seen here:
https://www.kitsapsun.com/story/news/local/2023/07/03/b
remerton-washington-homelessness-ordinance-tent-
encampments-laws-camping/70375250007/
Meanwhile years later still no public bathrooms. But yes
there are photo ops.
Over two years after Frey's deceptive deflection to the
mayor, we can see Councilmember Mockler do the same
thing - she adds a very dramatic eye roll and sigh to enhance
the image of an exasperated legislator whose hands are tied
by the omnipotence of a do-nothing Mayor Wheeler:
"8-14-25 Mockler Blames Mayor Re Lack Of Public
Restrooms, Omitting Council Can Enact This Into
Law." https://youtu.be/Nn2igyRqSGI
Councilmember Mockler has an upcoming Town Hall titled
"Government 101." This is how Mockler (on The Conduit)
deliberately hides the legislative power and duty to do
something about helping the homeless maintain their dignity
- a U.N. human right:
"You know that 10 grand that we allotted. ... It's still sitting in
our budget. The mayor refuses to pay it. If you look in well in
any government document the legislative body makes policy
decisions, and then the executive body carries them out. So
if that doesn't happen, we haven't been able to figure out
how to go around that ... It's sitting in our budget and from
time to time, we go is there any way to do that? The mayor
feels it's too great a risk ..."
The "policy decision" Mockler mentions is not hocus pocus.
Legislators legislate. It is called law. Council must make law
requiring 24/7 public bathrooms because it very well knows
there are unhoused Bremertonians who need them, and
who in fact will be arrested by a punitive police force if
caught having bodily functions.
The deceit is casual at Norm Dicks. And self-serving.
Another example, of deceit-as-policy from Council. This one
after our protest over how
"6-4-25: Jeff Coughlin Lies On Mayor - Omits Council Has
Power To Enact 24/7 Public Bathroom
Law." https://youtu.be/SqIfAQ2zGjw
" ... a theme here you'll see which is Council allocated
money for downtown restrooms. Mayor didn't propose how
to use that. We did give that money to a local non-profit, G2
G2. A good chunk of it so for the record that is where most of
that ten thousand did go. But we gave it to administration to
implement and it wasn't implemented."
Omitted is that the City Charter gives Council what it needs
to overcome the mayor's spitefulness towards the
homeless. With a 5 - 2 vote the Council can override any of
the Mayor's veto and pass one or more ordinances requiring
as a matter of law the installation and funding of 24/7 public
bathrooms.
City Charter, Section 15 Ordinances - Styles - Requisites -
Veto:
https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Bremerton/#!/Bremer
tonCH.html#Section15
"... (5) Every ordinance that passes Council in order to
become valid must be presented to the Mayor. If approved, it
shall be signed, but if not, it shall be returned with written
objections to Council who shall cause the objections to be
entered on the record and proceed to reconsideration
thereof within thirty (30) days of return of the vetoed
ordinance. If upon reconsideration, a majority plus one of
the whole membership favor its passage, the ordinance
shall become valid notwithstanding the Mayor’s veto. The
Mayor’s veto with respect to budget measures shall extend
to specific items only, and not to the whole budget. If the
Mayor fails for ten days to either approve or veto an
ordinance, it shall become valid without approval.
Ordinances shall be signed by the Mayor and attested by the
City Clerk. (Amended by election, 11/8/11)"
A noise nuisance veto was overriden by the Council in this
way a few years ago.
This misrepresentation of law - an erasure of law giving the
Council all the tools it needs to help the homeless, denies
the public not only true representation in their governance,
but deprives us of even being able to understand and assess
the workings of our government. This is the erasure of law by
those who are most knowledgeable about law because they
are inside the manifestation of law as governmental public
officers with a duty to us not to lie to or mislead us.
Again, it is not only a violation of our civil rights, but a crime
for Council to deceive us.
RCW 42.20.040 False report.
"Every public officer who shall knowingly make any false
or misleading statement in any official report or
statement, under circumstances not otherwise
prohibited by law, shall be guilty of a gross
misdemeanor."
Council's deceit-as-policy is deployed despite what the
public wants. The casual deceit is intended to undermine
the desire of the public for humane treatment of our
neighbors, even those who are destitute. Just on the day of
Coughlin's misleading statement of non-law, the following
city residents implored Council for decency towards the
homeless:
"Akuyea Vargas (ERACE Coalition) Our Youth Leave The
City / Become Homeless Because City
Unaffordable" https://youtu.be/YAmgFqTiAvM
"6-4-25 Wendy: City Responsible For Human Waste
Outside / Other Cities Have 24/7 Public Restrooms."
https://youtu.be/SVcBBHXG0bw
"6-4-25 Jeff: Moonshot Effort Needed For Homeless;
Minimally, Dignity Demands 24/7 Public
Restrooms." https://youtu.be/Sjg4VOG95J0
"6-4-25 Joslyn: RTB's Grass Roots Efforts Trying To Help
Our Homeless Neighbors- Stop Hindering
Us." https://youtu.be/w-lv_D0tIio
These sincere entreaties from the public go back years. The
default deceit is a betrayal of public trust. Deception on
matters of law from the dais of the Council is a crime.
Bremerton's City Charter is not a secret, and Council should
not feign impotence when it is literally empowered to make
law. The False report law is also not dead. It is also not
restricted to falsified paperwork as in Andrea Spencer's
tenure as our developers' favorite fixer.
The Council has long enabled Spencer's dismantling of
shoreline law on behalf of developers, it has been able to
make years of comp planning deliver gifts to the developer
cartel for years to come, it has spent months devising ways
to hide the murder of due process inside "SB5290"
measures to protect developers and their rigged projects, it
has orchestrated proceedings intended to act as PR to put a
smiley face on the persecution of the homeless, and
Council has even recently laundered a moratorium effort as
to the 8-Year MFTE into the enshrinement of that subsidy,
while abandoning low-income housing. These were all
protracted efforts at law-making, however dishonest. But to
aid the homeless, a mysterious torpor overcomes you all
and somehow it's all the mayor's fault ...
If you do not want to help the homeless, say so. If you want
the homeless to have access to basic sanitation 24/7, make
law. You are law-makers.
I have attached as an exhibit to this entreaty a prosecuting
attorney's press release regarding the charge of False Report
some years ago against the mayor of Langley, who violated
RCW 42.20.040 as a planning director. This law is real. It
acted to bar the Langley mayor from public office. Perhaps it
is time to enliven this statute in Bremerton.
____________________
Attachments: Prosecuting Attorney's Press Release Re False
Report Charge (RCW 42.20.040) Against Ex-Mayor Of
Langley
--
Friends of Smith Cove in Evergreen Park
https://www.youtube.com/@FriendsofSmithCove
Virus-free.www.avast.com
9-16-25
Public Recognition Comment For 9-17-25 - City's Deceit-As-Policy
Bremerton's Government's Deceit-As-Policy Includes Misrepresenting / Omitting Law To The
Public & How This Is Deployed To Harm Our Unhoused
To: City Council / News Media
I am submitting this as my Public Recognition comment for City Council hearing of 9-17-25.
Please include the attachments from the Island County Prosecuting Attorney as part of this
comment.
If this falls on deaf ears to those currently on Council, perhaps one day it won't. We need a
culture of integrity at the Norm Dicks. Not deceit-as-policy. Our homeless need your help.
You are law-makers and you can make law requiring 24/7 public restrooms. And not just in a
ghetto to keep them away from the bright shiny surfaces of your developer cartel masters.
Our government cannot lie to or deceive us.
Bremerton’s municipal government does this to such a pervasive extent it is violating our
Constitutional civil rights and obstructing our ability to be meaningfully informed of public
processes so that we may intelligently give input to the decision-making processes intended
to fulfill representative governance.
As you all know by now - but have chosen to cover up - Director Andrea Spencer's tightly run
Department of Community Development is a honed tool for corruption inuring to benefit the
top dog realty / developers in town - most prominently, "Sound West Group." After Jack
Paauw's (and Mike Miller's) installation into the Planning Commission, this crony network for
the wealth and connected (see "4th Street Action Group") is effectively a cartel. Uncovering
this starting with the DCD-rigged Evergreen Pointe project was my introduction to the
supposedly finest citizens in Bremerton.
Unchecked commercial ventures only become more mendacious over time. Their big money
lobbies have attritted our democratic ideals locally and nationally. In Bremerton, we see the
ultimate result of this. And because city agents are in bed with these ventures, they have also
embraced deceit, lying, and concealment in dealing with the public. The cartel's takeover here
has tainted our city's public processes in many ways. One way is the routine infusion of DCD
presentations and municipal proceedings with lies, deception, and calculated omission. The
public is thereby manipulated and democratic processes subverted. This has been used to
effectively erase law and civil values and principles which developers consider obstacles to
their private pecuniary enrichment.
Page 1 of 11.
Our government cannot lie to or deceive us. Our transparency statutes are to ensure
democracy and they state these principles clearly as being in aid of actual democracy.
Public Records Act RCW 42.56.030
"The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies that serve them.
The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to
decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know.
The people insist on remaining informed so that they may maintain control over the
instruments that they have created."
Open Public Meetings Act RCW 42.30.010
"The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve
them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to
decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know.
The people insist on remaining informed and informing the people's public servants of
their views so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created."
These statutorily expressed ideals did not arise out of a vacuum. Our Supreme Court has long
held that our First Amendment right not only gives us protected speech, but imposes a duty
upon government to ensure the free and full flow of knowledge and information from the
government to the people. Our First Amendment right to freedom of expression is not
separable from the First Amendment right to information from the City of Bremerton.
INFORMATION - not disinformation, and certainly not the purposeful manipulative omission
of information REGARDING LAW:
* The right to receive information is the fundamental counterpart of the right of free
speech; it ensures the public’s right to receive information in an open society. Fritz v.
Gorton, 83 Wash. 2d 275 (1974). Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 (1967).
* The "Constitution protects the right to receive information and ideas." Stanley v.
Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969).
* The "State may not ... contract the spectrum of available knowledge." Griswold v.
Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
* The First Amendment "prohibit[s] government from limiting the stock of information
from which members of the public may draw." First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti ,
435 U.S. 765 (1978); Board of Ed., Island Trees Union v. Pico , 457 U.S. 853 (1982).
Page 2 of 11.
These tenets are not just feel-good aspirations; they are Constitutional mandates. They are
important enough that Washington has a statute well over a century old:
RCW 42.20.040 False report.
"Every public officer who shall knowingly make any false or misleading statement in any
official report or statement, under circumstances not otherwise prohibited by law, shall
be guilty of a gross misdemeanor."
Bremerton has become accustomed to evading this necessary body of truth-sustaining and
democracy-sustaining law.
For example, Andrea Spencer's first rigging of the Evergreen Pointe project is objectively
obvious simply by looking at the law, and looking at her decision-making as evidenced by
DCD's written analyses and decisions. We have the records. The decision-making - a sham -
was outside of the state law's framing. Spencer simply decided to ignore the law requiring the
use of a variance procedure and criteria to allow Mark Goldberg's initial iteration of the E.P.
project a height well past the admitted 35-foot height limit. She instead used a "conditional
use" veneer made up out of thin air for the purpose of deceiving the public that her agency
was acting in good faith. With the Sound West Group iteration of the Evergreen Pointe
projecte, DCD simply doubled-down and got even more creative in flouting law. And Council
could not care less. The jump in value from $42 million to $57 million might even earn
another “pivot award” from Denise Frey one day.
Bremerton - city administration, City Council, and Planning Commission - has allowed Spencer
and her corrupted mendacious agency to continue to wreak havoc on law and process
decades later. It has simply decided not only to misrepresent state shoreline and
environmental law, but to effectively nullify and erase it - particularly the Shoreline
Management Act. This erasure inures to the benefit of the developers who have a monopoly
here (as we've see in the Evergreen Pointe project).
"Map E & Interrupted Buffer = E.P. Project. Each Violates RCW 90.58.020, But DCD Evades On
6-17-24." https://youtu.be/xQhlt8DHaYU
"DCD Cons Us, Erases Shoreline Management Act, & Never Discloses E.P. Project's 35-Foot
Height Limit" https://youtu.be/qqTznzYA9G4
This is evidence of the raw power, influence, and dominance of the developers' cartel over our
elected and appointed public officers - some of whom are literally directors and partners in
the cartel ventures. See Planning Commissioner Jack Paauw and Councilmember Denise Frey's
constant fawning over all things Sound West.
Page 3 of 11.
Another example of casual governmental deceit is the recent disgrace of Councilmember
Anna Mockler - caught in the act of proposing a deceptive cover story of water conservation
to promulgate harassment of the homeless out of public parks.
"Mockler: Soak The Homeless & Say Its Conservation / Goodnow: Turning Hoses On People Is
A Bad Look" https://youtu.be/kC_BEduxCXE (Public Safety Committee 8-7-25)
"Mockler's Non-Apology Side-Steps Deceit Of Her Park Proposal: Invoke Conservation To
Harass Homeless" https://youtu.be/AHADbRGnNDE (City Council hearing 8-20-25)
Another example of deceit-as-policy in action is the Study Session preceding the Mockler
disgrace in which she, and other Councilmembers, are seen using this public process to mount
a PR stagecraft intended to depict Commonstreet as a successful "social services" aid to the
homeless, and the Council as a caring body concerned with the demographic they want to
disappear. This PR effort was mounted after public outcry at the Council over the city's heist of
CDBG funds intended for the needy homeless and low-income to enrich Sound West Group
and its cronies to achieve not low-income housing but gentrification via the B-Flats
apartments and the Quincy Square “arts district” and “cultural resurgence.”
"Snow Job Study Session: 'Homeless Outreach;' Per 'Validated' CommonStreet, Police Are
'Exceptional.'" https://youtu.be/XQeExMky2DU (July 2025)
Viewing the August 7, 2025 Public Safety Committee deliberations which captured for all time
the attempted creation of a deceptive ploy as part of a proposal to harass and ghettoize the
homeless out of our parks, one sees through the snow job Study Session in which the
Commonstreet contractor tells Council what it wants to hear. In the Public Safety exchange,
we see Ms. Munson's reality-bending "the police are exceptional" (Joseph Redal might
disagree), and we see Tom Wolf extol Commonstreet as a tool through which the homeless
are marked as refusing services so that police can brand them "criminal vagrants" to then
"tighten" the targeting of their punitive persecution against the homeless.
How Deceit-As-Policy Covers Up The Fact That Councilmembers Do Not Want Public
Bathrooms For The Homeless Despite Their Pretense
Council insists it is not depraved. It insists it really really cares. And yet, the most minimal nod
towards the idea that the homeless might actually be human, might actually be a mom and
her kids on the street, might actually be someone trying to hold onto to his or her dignity to
fight through another day - a 24/7 public restroom - somehow seems beyond the reach of
our very very caring compassionate Councilmembers. It is almost as if they were not law-
makers but were in thrall to some mysterious force. Meanwhile, years pass and city policy has
hardened into more deceit-as-policy.
Page 4 of 11.
"5-16-18 Younger: It's Frustrating To Listen To Pleas Of The Homeless But 'We're Actively
Engaged.'" https://youtu.be/Y6_SAd6SDLw
"Camping Ordinance for MLK Way (Clip) - Denise Frey " https://youtu.be/81PUWg85u6A
(June 2023)
“Before we get any more aggressive … we better know what we’re doing as far as providing
adequate support." Councilmember Denise Frey expressed concern over how it looks to ready
persecution against the homeless without addressing the UN human right of sanitation for
the poorest of the poor. Here, our local Chamber of Commerce influencer at Norm Dicks
starts the Council trend of avoiding its duty by pretending the City Charter doesn’t instruct
Council how to provide public bathrooms.
Understanding what it says about character, Frey prepares a cover story much as Anna
Mockler recently has - the $10K allocation for portable toilets had not yet been installed on
MLK Way. The light bulb turned on: "This is for the administration. Fix it!" Frey demands while
blaming the branch of government which does not make law. The back drop can seen here:
https://www.kitsapsun.com/story/news/local/2023/07/03/bremerton-washington-
homelessness-ordinance-tent-encampments-laws-camping/70375250007/
Page 5 of 11.
Over two years after Frey's deceptive deflection in pointing to the mayor, we can see
Councilmember Mockler recently do the same thing - she adds a very dramatic eye roll and
sigh to enhance the image of an exasperated legislator whose hands are tied by the
omnipotence of a do-nothing Mayor Wheeler:
"8-14-25 Mockler Blames Mayor Re Lack Of Public Restrooms, Omitting Council Can Enact
This Into Law." https://youtu.be/Nn2igyRqSGI
Councilmember Mockler has an upcoming Town Hall titled "Government 101." This is how
Mockler (on The Conduit) deliberately hides the legislative power and duty to do something
about helping the homeless maintain their dignity - a U.N. human right:
"You know that 10 grand that we allotted. ... It's still sitting in our budget. The
mayor refuses to pay it. If you look in well in any government document the
legislative body makes policy decisions, and then the executive body carries
them out. So if that doesn't happen - we haven't been able to figure out how to
go around that ... It's sitting in our budget and from time to time, we go is there
any way to do that? The mayor feels it's too great a risk ..."
The "policy decision" Mockler mentions is not hocus pocus. Legislators legislate. It is called
law. Law-making is why she and other Councilmembers were elected. Council must make law
requiring 24/7 public bathrooms because it very well knows there are unhoused
Bremertonians who need them, and who in fact will be arrested by a punitive police force if
caught having bodily functions.
The deceit is casual at Norm Dicks. And self-serving. Another example of deceit-as-policy
from Council. This one after our protest over how the city heisted CDBG funds for the needy
to enrich Sound West Group.
"6-4-25: Jeff Coughlin Lies On Mayor - Omits Council Has Power To Enact 24/7 Public
Bathroom Law." https://youtu.be/SqIfAQ2zGjw
" ... a theme here you'll see which is Council allocated money for downtown
restrooms. Mayor didn't propose how to use that. We did give that money to a
local non-profit, G2 G2. A good chunk of it so for the record that is where most
of that ten thousand did go. But we gave it to administration to implement and
it wasn't implemented."
Omitted is that the City Charter gives Council what it needs to overcome the mayor's
spitefulness towards the homeless. With a 5 - 2 vote the Council can override any of the
Mayor's vetos and pass one or more ordinances requiring as a matter of law the installation,
maintenance, and funding of 24/7 public bathrooms for our unhoused.
Page 6 of 11.
Bremerton City Charter, Section 15 Ordinances - Styles - Requisites - Veto:
https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Bremerton/#!/BremertonCH.html #Section15
"... (5) Every ordinance that passes Council in order to become valid must be
presented to the Mayor. If approved, it shall be signed, but if not, it shall be returned
with written objections to Council who shall cause the objections to be entered on the
record and proceed to reconsideration thereof within thirty (30) days of return of the
vetoed ordinance. If upon reconsideration, a majority plus one of the whole
membership favor its passage, the ordinance shall become valid notwithstanding the
Mayor’s veto. The Mayor’s veto with respect to budget measures shall extend to
specific items only, and not to the whole budget. If the Mayor fails for ten days to
either approve or veto an ordinance, it shall become valid without approval. Ordinances
shall be signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. (Amended by election,
11/8/11)"
This process is not arcane or secret. This has actually happened. A noise nuisance veto was
overriden by the Council in this way a few years ago.
This misrepresentation of law - an erasure of law which gives the Council all the tools it needs
to help the homeless, denies the public not only true representation in their governance, but
deprives most of us of even being able to understand and assess the workings of our
government. This is the erasure of law by those who are most knowledgeable about law
because they are inside the manifestation of law as governmental public officers with a duty
to us not to lie to or mislead us.
Again, it is not only a Constitutional violation of our civil rights, but a crime for Council to
deceive us.
RCW 42.20.040 False report.
"Every public officer who shall knowingly make any false or misleading statement in
any official report or statement, under circumstances not otherwise prohibited by law,
shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor."
Council's deceit-as-policy is deployed in spite what the public wants. The casual deceit is
intended to undermine the desire of the public for humane treatment of our neighbors, even
those who are destitute and barely hanging on. Just on the day of Coughlin's misleading
statement of non-law, the following city residents implored Council for decency towards the
homeless:
Page 7 of 11.
"Akuyea Vargas (ERACE Coalition) Our Youth Leave The City / Become Homeless Because City
Unaffordable" https://youtu.be/YAmgFqTiAvM
"6-4-25 Wendy: City Responsible For Human Waste Outside / Other Cities Have 24/7 Public
Restrooms." https://youtu.be/SVcBBHXG0bw
"6-4-25 Jeff: Moonshot Effort Needed For Homeless; Minimally, Dignity Demands 24/7 Public
Restrooms." https://youtu.be/Sjg4VOG95J0
"6-4-25 Joslyn: RTB's Grass Roots Efforts Trying To Help Our Homeless Neighbors- Stop
Hindering Us." https://youtu.be/w-lv_D0tIio
These sincere entreaties from the public go back years and continue. Council’s default deceit
is a betrayal of public trust. Deception on matters of law from the dais of the Council is a
crime. Bremerton's City Charter is not a secret, and Council should not feign impotence when
it is literally empowered to make law. The False Report law is also not dead. It is also not
restricted to falsified paperwork as in Spencer's tenure as our developers' favorite fixer. As
Council President said years ago over Leslie Daug’s “this is bullsh_t!:” Councilmembers are
"free to express [their] opinion, elected officials are held to a higher standard ." “Like it or not,
[their] actions do reflect on the council ." That higher standard should not allow deceit or
misrepresenting law when communicating to the public.
The Council has long enabled Spencer's dismantling of shoreline and environmental law on
behalf of developers, it has been able to make years of “Bremerton2044” comp planning
deliver gifts to the developer cartel for years to come, it has spent months devising ways to
hide the murder of due process inside "SB5290" measures to protect developers and their
rigged projects, it has orchestrated proceedings intended to act as PR to put a smiley face on
the persecution of the homeless, and Council has even recently laundered a moratorium effort
as to the 8-Year MFTE into the opposite of a moratorium: the enshrinement of that subsidy,
while abandoning all mechanisms low-income housing. T hese were all protracted efforts at
law-making, however dishonest. But to aid the homeless with a bare minimum common sense
measure, a mysterious torpor overcomes you all and somehow it's all the mayor's fault ...
If Council does not want to help the homeless, say so. If you want the homeless to have
access to basic sanitation 24/7, make the law. You are law-makers.
I have attached as an exhibit to this entreaty a prosecuting attorney's press release regarding
the charge of False Report some years ago against the mayor of Langley, who violated RCW
42.20.040 as a planning director. This law is real. It acted to bar the Langley mayor from public
office.
Perhaps it is time to enliven this statute in Bremerton.
Page 8 of 11.
EXHIBITS
Page 9 of 11.
Page 10 of 11.
Page 11 of 11.
From: kim siebens <kimmysiebens@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 5:30 PM
To: City Council <city.council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Public Restrooms
Hi, This is Kimmy Siebens, representing myself and the Bremerton Homeless Community
Coalition.
Today, I'm addressing the $10,000 allocated for public restrooms that was approved by council
but never implemented.
I respectfully don't know whether the Council understands its legislative authority or not. They
CAN advance this initiative with a supermajority vote of 5 to 2. They have already demonstrated
their support by allocating the $10,000. I just can’t figure out what is preventing them from
exercising this option.
It's concerning to me when councilmember Coughlin stated on June 4th that "I really want to
iterate a theme here, council allocated money for downtown restrooms... We gave it to
administration to implement it and it wasn't implemented”. I'd like to remind everyone of a
Washington State Law RCW 42.20.040 which states that public officers who knowingly make
false statements in their official capacity are committing a gross misdemeanor. Because he is a
NASA scientist and someone running for Mayor, I have a hard time believing he doesn't know
how the government works.
As a friendly reminder, I would also like to iterate: The City Council creates legislation to
address the need for public restrooms. If the Mayor disagrees, he can veto it. The Council can
then override that veto with a 5 to 2 vote. Should the Mayor not enforce the law, legal remedies
through a writ of mandamus can compel him or else he would be held in contempt of court.
Our unhoused community members cannot keep waiting while you keep dodging responsibility.
They deserve real action from the body that has both the funds and authority to address this
need.
If what you need is more political will, please tell us—we're here to help. Our coalition can
provide the support you might need. Currently there is such a lack of transparency and so much
political double talk, I honestly cannot speculate on what your true barriers are unless you tell us
and let us help you.
Thank you for your time,
Kimmy Siebens RN
Economic Inequity and Health Task Force Member, Washington Physicians for Social
Responsibility,
http://www.wpsr.org
President, Their Voice
http://www.their-voice.org
Founder, Bremerton Homeless Community Coalition
https://www.facebook.com/groups/bremertonhomeless
Founding Member, Rock the Block
http://www.facebook.com/groups/rocktheblockkitsap/
2023 USA TODAY Woman of the Year Honoree
https://www.kitsapsun.com/in-depth/news/2023/03/19/kimmy-siebens-washington-usa-
today-women-year/69925589007/
2002 Citizen of The Year - Kitsap County Association of Realtors
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=914581119903692&set=pcb.914581543236983
From: Reama Bubblez <reama@spreadsupplies.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 6:14 PM
To: City Council <city.council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Permits in Charleston
Hi council,
My point that I didn't get to say is please review the city laws to be flexible in situations
like this.
There should be wiggle room to promote progress and if that needs to be more clearly
stated, let's make that happen.
Thanks for everything you do!!
Yay for being gay in Bremerton!
Reama (she/her/hers)
Spread Supplies
New and used art supplies
641 N Callow Ave
Bremerton, Washington
360-800-6641
www.spreadsupplies.com
facebook.com/spreadsupplies
instagram.com/spreadsupplies
Kitsap County Earth Day Award recipient - 2024
Leadership Kitsap's 20 under 40 honoree - 2025
Published for
September 17
Council Meeting
Council Reports
Item 7
Council District Updates
September 17, 2025
District 6 –Councilor Anna Mockler
39/22/2025
Details coming soon for
my October meeting
which will focus on
Government 101!
Eco Forum Review
49/22/2025
This is an opportunity to
contribute to
transparency,
accountability, and sound
financial practices in your
community.
Serve Your Community –Join Bremerton’s
Audit Committee
District 5 –Councilmember Michael Goodnow
Charleston Business District
Invites the Community to the:
Wycoff Overpass Mural
Ribbon Cutting Ceremony
Saturday, September 27, 2025
1:00 –2:30 PM
District 4 –Councilmember Jane Rebelowski
89/22/2025
On September 11 neighbors came
together for an important community
conversation on the impact on community
and individuals experiencing
homelessness.
Next Meeting:
Review of what priorities were set in
2025 and what should be adjusted for
2026.
Neighbors in Conversation
District 3 –Councilmember Jeff Coughlin