HomeMy WebLinkAbout1 - Original Submission_ FW_ 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security ImprovementsFrom:Stephanie Olson
To:Katie Ketterer
Subject:FW: 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security Improvements
Date:Thursday, June 10, 2021 9:44:07 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
Hi Katie,
Please see Brett’s email below – we are good to go.
Thanks!
Stephanie Olson
Legal Assistant
City Attorney’s Office
(360) 473-2345
stephanie.olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us
From: Brett Jette <Brett.Jette@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 9:41 AM
To: Stephanie Olson <Stephanie.Olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: RE: 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security Improvements
Yes, its fine, I don’t disagree that it doesn’t hurt anything to have the non-collusion form in there.
Also 1-02(8) are incorporated by reference. The contract appears to incorporate all Standard
Specifications unless modified and 1-02(8) is not modified. Again, I don’t think it is necessarily an
issue.
Best,
Brett
From: Stephanie Olson <Stephanie.Olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 9:28 AM
To: Brett Jette <Brett.Jette@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: FW: 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security Improvements
Hi Brett,
I reviewed the latest bid docs and checked on the changes you noted, here is what Parametrix
responded with and I confirmed in my review:
Page I-5, the Bidder’s checklist numbering is incorrect I think. FIXED
Page II-7, Section 1-02.4(1) It says first sentence of the last paragraph…I believe that it
should be the seventh paragraph, not the last paragraph, but they should double check that.
DOUBLE CHECKED – THE LANGUAGE IS THE SAME AS THE AWPA GSP – NO
CHANGE
Page II-35, at the bottom, it says LO=liquidated damages, it should be LD=liquidated
damages based on the formula right above it. FIXED
Question:Is this a WSDOT/USDOT funded project? I’m curious about the use of the USDOT non-collusionform and provisions 1-02.8(1) and 1-02.8(2) if this is not a WSDOT/USDOT project. THIS FORMIS POSSIBLY JUST A LEGACY FROM OTHER PROJECTS AND NOT NEEDED, BUT IT
SHOULDN’T CAUSE AN ISSUE IF WE LEAVE IT IN. I COULDN’T FIND THE PROVISIONS1-02.8(1) AND (2), WE MUST HAVE TAKEN THEM OUT. With all of that corrected/answered – can I tell Katie we approve?
Thanks,
Stephanie Olson
Legal Assistant
City Attorney’s Office
(360) 473-2345
stephanie.olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us
From: Katie Ketterer <Katie.Ketterer@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 10:05 AM
To: Stephanie Olson <Stephanie.Olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: FW: 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security Improvements
Hi Stephanie,
Attached is the revised bid document for the Res 4 project which Brett reviewed earlier this week.
Comments have been addressed and a response was provided for Brett’s question (in the thread
below, highlighted in red). Do we need any further review, or are we good to go?
Thanks,
Katie Ketterer
Project Manager
City of Bremerton
Katie.Ketterer@ci.bremerton.wa.us
360-473-5334
From: David Dinkuhn <DDinkuhn@parametrix.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 2:54 PM
To: Katie Ketterer <Katie.Ketterer@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
David Dinkuhn, P.E.Senior Consultant360.850.5319 direct360.471.3917 cellddinkuhn@parametrix.com60 Washington AveBremerton, WA 98337
Subject: RE: 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security Improvements
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless
you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Katie, the revised doc is attached, I did it in the pdf using “edit text” because our word processing
says they cant take anymore specs this week. See responses to legal questions below.
Please QC the changes and scroll through for formatting, I found and fixed a couples.
Thanks,
Dave
Parametrix
ENGINEERING . PLANNING . ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
From: Katie Ketterer <Katie.Ketterer@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 9:47 AM
To: David Dinkuhn <DDinkuhn@parametrix.com>
Subject: FW: 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security Improvements
Hi Dave,
A couple of questions and comments on the final documents for you. I have two below, and then
there are a few from Legal in the email thread below.
Page 7, Site Walk: Change date to July 8, 2021 (same time)
Page 94, second sentence. NTP date should be changed to August 30, 2021.
Thanks,
Katie Ketterer
Project Manager
City of Bremerton
Katie.Ketterer@ci.bremerton.wa.us
360-473-5334
From: Stephanie Olson <Stephanie.Olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 8:51 AM
To: Katie Ketterer <Katie.Ketterer@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Cc: Brett Jette <Brett.Jette@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: FW: 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security Improvements
Hi Katie,
Please see Brett’s email below regarding his review of the Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security
Improvements bid packet, specifically his question about the WSDOT/USDOT funded project.
Thanks!
Stephanie Olson
Legal Assistant
City Attorney’s Office
(360) 473-2345
stephanie.olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us
From: Brett Jette <Brett.Jette@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 4:43 PM
To: Stephanie Olson <Stephanie.Olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: RE: 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security Improvements
Overall it looks good. I have a couple of potential corrections and a question.
Corrections:
Page I-5, the Bidder’s checklist numbering is incorrect I think. FIXED
Page II-7, Section 1-02.4(1) It says first sentence of the last paragraph…I believe that it
should be the seventh paragraph, not the last paragraph, but they should double check that.
DOUBLE CHECKED – THE LANGUAGE IS THE SAME AS THE AWPA GSP – NO
CHANGE
Page II-35, at the bottom, it says LO=liquidated damages, it should be LD=liquidated
damages based on the formula right above it. FIXED
Question:
Is this a WSDOT/USDOT funded project? I’m curious about the use of the USDOT non-collusionform and provisions 1-02.8(1) and 1-02.8(2) if this is not a WSDOT/USDOT project. THIS FORMIS POSSIBLY JUST A LEGACY FROM OTHER PROJECTS AND NOT NEEDED, BUT ITSHOULDN’T CAUSE AN ISSUE IF WE LEAVE IT IN. I COULDN’T FIND THE PROVISIONS
1-02.8(1) AND (2), WE MUST HAVE TAKEN THEM OUT. Best,
Brett
Brett M. JetteAssistant City AttorneyCity of Bremerton345 6th Street, Suite 100Bremerton, Washington 98337(360) 473-2336
Brett.Jette@ci.bremerton.wa.us ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION This e-mail message and its attachments may contain confidential attorney work product and be
subject to the attorney-client communication privilege. It is intended solely for the use of theindividual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible to deliver itto the intended recipient, you are hereby advised that any dissemination, distribution or copying ofthis communication is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately
notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and/or destroy the original and all copies of the e-mailmessage.
From: Stephanie Olson <Stephanie.Olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 11:02 AM
To: Brett Jette <Brett.Jette@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: 210196 - Bid Docs - Reservoir 4 Fencing and Security Improvements
Here is the green sheet and the bid docs.
Thanks!
Stephanie Olson
Legal Assistant
City Attorney’s Office
(360) 473-2345
stephanie.olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us
From: Katie Ketterer <Katie.Ketterer@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Sent: Thursday, June 3, 2021 9:35 AM
To: Stephanie Olson <Stephanie.Olson@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Contract for green sheet review
Hi Stephanie,
Attached is a contract and bid package for green sheet review. This project is scheduled to go out to
bid on 6/15.
Thanks,
Katie Ketterer
Project Manager
City of Bremerton
Katie.Ketterer@ci.bremerton.wa.us
360-473-5334