HomeMy WebLinkAbout5275 . � ,- --- r.
� �'�c;i--:�,����-:
AGENDA BILL
7D
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Consuitant Supplemental Study Session Date: September 14, 2016
Agreement (East Park Stormwater COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 21, 2016
Outfall/Lower Wheaton Way Bridge to Department: PW 8� U
Bridge)—Supplement No. 5 Presenter: Tom Knuckey
Phone: (360)473-2376
SUMMARY: The City signed an agreement for design services with Gray&Osbome, Inc. on August
21, 2013 for the Lower Wheaton Way Project at an original cost of$187,480. On September 30,
2014 Council approved a Supplemental Agreement increasing the contract value to$267,480; the
increased cost was for design revisions, and to provide construction support services for the Lower
Wheaton Way project. Additional supplements were executed to extend the term of the consultant
contract to design the storm water outfall. Staff recommends another supplemental agreement for
$12,695 to complete the East Park Stormwater Outfall. Tasks include SEPA permit review and
response, permit applications, final plans, specifications, construction support, and cost estimate.
The new total for the contract is$280,175 and the contract completion date is extended to
September 30, 2017 since the construction will be done during the summer of 2017.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Consultant Supplemental Agreement No. 5
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): This project is funded by the stormwater utility, and
is within the budget of the project.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: � No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSIO(d ACTION: � Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consultant Supplemental Agreement for
Supplement No. 5 with Gray�Osborne, Inc. for the East Park Stormwater Outfall Project; and
authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the modifications with substantially the same terms and
conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: �Approve ❑ Deny ❑Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 01107115
.
� , ;��,�Transportation Improvement Board
'�,���Consultant Supplemental Agreement
Agency City of Bremerton Project fVumber 8-2-152(025)-1
Project Name Lower Wheaton Way (Manette Bridge to �ebo Boulevard)
Consulting Firm Gray & Osborne, Inc.
Supplement Phase Supplement 5 for East Park Outfall Permitting and Design Revisions
The Local Agency of the City of Bremerton,Washington, desires to supplement the agreement entered into
with Gray&Osborne, Inc., and executed on August 21, 2013.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section II, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby amended to include:
SCOPE OF WORK (ADDITIONAL SERVICES)
East Park OutFall Permitting and Design Revisions:
The City has requested revisions to the 90 percent plans provided to the City as part of the earlier
design effort.
A. Prepare responses to the comments received on the SEPA Checklist and permit
application forms and submit to them the City.
B. Revise the outfall structure based on SEPA review comments from the Washington
State Department of Ecology,Washington State Department of Fish 8�Wildlife, and
the Suquamish Tribe received after the 90 percent design submittal.
C. Prepare Plans, Specifications, Cost Estimates, and permit application documents
for the revisions. The City will submit and pay all permit fees associated with the
project.
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the Completion Date
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLE710N DATE September 30, 2017
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows as set forth in Exhibit A-5
MAXIMUM AMOUNT PAYABLE $280,175
� If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign and date in the
appropriate spaces below.
Agency Signature Date
� 9 27 ���
Consultant Signature Date
��i��� 81�1�/G
Page 1 of 3
���� Transportation Improvement Board •
i3�� Consultant Su lemental A reement
,Tl�
�.��j� p p 9
EXHIBIT A-�i
Supplement 1 Supptement 2
� (Additional (Schley Canyon Supplement 5
Design Culvert (East Park
• Original Services and Replacement Supplement 3 Supplement 4 OutFall
Agreement Limited CM Predesign Report (Amend (Amend Permitting
(Design Support and Limited CM Completion Completion and Design
Phase) Services) Sup ort Services) Date) Date) Revisions) Total
Direct Salary Cost $ 50,988 $ 9,228 $15,268 $0 $0 $ 2,936 $ 78,420
Overhead $ g1,779 $16,610 $27,482 $0 $0 $ 5,285 $141,156
(including Payroll Additives)
Direct Non-salary Costs $ 23,299 $ 286 $ 837 $0 $0 $ 241 $ 24,663
Fixed Fee $ 21,414 $ 3,876 $ 6,413 $0 $0 $ 1,233 $ 32,936
Contingency $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $0 $0 $ 3,000 $ 3,000
Total $187,480 $30,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $12,695 $280,175
Page 2 of 3
.
� %� Transportation Improvement Board
'���—
�1Consultant Supplemental Agreement
EXHIBIT B-5(COfVSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION SHEET-COST PLUS FIXED FEE)
Prepared by: Date:
Barry Baker,P.E. August 10,2016
Project:
Lower Wheaton Way (Manette Bridge to Lebo Boulevard) – East Park OutFall Permitting and
Design Revisions
Classification Hours Rate Cost
Principal-in-Charge 4 x $32 to$58 = $ 224
Project Manager/Engineer 16 x $32 to$55 = $ 672
Design/Civil Engineer(s) 36 x $18 to$36 = $ 1,224
Transportation Engineer 0 x $24 to$50 = $ 0
Environmental Specialist 20 x $22 to$30 = $ 480
AutoCAD/GIS Technician 12 x $15 to$31 = $ 336
Survey Crew 0 x $43 to$96 = $ 0
Professional Land Surveyor 0 x $33 to$42 = $ 0
TOTAL DSC $ 2,936
OH Rate x DSC 180.00% x $2,936 = $ 5,285
FIXED FEE
FF Rate x DSC 42% x $2,936 = $ 1,233
REIMBURSABLE: Printing, Mileage, etc. $ 241
SUBCONSULTANTS COSTS(includes 10%Administrative Overhead): $ 0
CONTINGENCY: $ 3,000
TOTAL,CAMPBELL WAY STORMWATER OUTFALL DESIGN REVISIONS: $12,695
Page 3 of 3
-`�� �►���- ����
,
=_�.
� CONTRACT MODIFICATION AGREEMENT NO. 1
BETWEEN TI�E CITY OF BREMERTON AND
Gray & Osbo ne
Contract # 5�75
z
PROJECT Lower Wheaton Wav/East Park Outfall
CONSULTANT Grav & Osborne
DATE March 24 2016
THIS CONTitACT MODIFICATION AGREEMENT SPECIFICALLY AMENDS THE
AGREEMENT (the "Contract") entered into between the City of Bremerton and Gray &
Osborne on August 21,2013
All provisions in the Contract shall remain in full force and effect except as expressly modified by
this document.
For valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, the modifications to the Contract
are as follows:
I.
Section I. Scope , is modified as follows: Not applicablc
Section II. Term , is modified as follows:
The Consultant shall complete the work described in this Contract Modification Agreement by
September 30, 2016.
Section 1II. Com�ensation , is modified as follows: Not applicable.
II.
Consultant accepts all reyuirements of this Contract Modi�ication by endorsing below.
Consultant further agrees that this Contract Modi�cation constitutes full and �nal settlement
of all of the Consultant's claims for contract time and for all costs of any kind, including
without limitation, costs of delays related to any work either covered or affected by this
Coretract Modification, claims relatcd to on-site or home office over�ead, or lost profits. This
Contract Modification does not limit the City's right to bring a claim for past performance.
The undersigned consultant approves the foregoing Contract Modification as to the changes,
if any, ia� the contract price specified for each item, including any and all supervision costs and
other mascellaneous costs relating to the change in work, and as to the extension of time
allowed, if any,for completion of the entire work due to said Contract Modification.
CONTRACT MODIFICATION #4 I
Contract Numbcr 5475
�,.
d��r� This document well become a supplement of the contract and all provisions will apply hereto.
It is understood that this Contract ModiCcation shall be effective when approved by the City
of Bremcrton.
The parties whose names appear below warrant that they are authorized to enter into a
contract modification that is binding on thc parties of this contract. In addition, Consultant
warrants that it has or will inform the surety of this change, and s9�all take appropriate action
to modify any bonds required under the contract to address this change.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Contract Modification on the day
and year first written above.
City Engineer/Public Works Director approved to process �
[nitials and Date
CONSULTANT. THE CITY OF BREMER'TON
v a�6�t.�� �
(Signalure) (Signature)
gy yh/GH�L Q. �DH�sav P.C, By Patty Lent
Its �sle�' Its Ma or
DATE: �//�f//� DATE: D �� l
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
�
Bremerton City tt ney City Clerk
NOTICES TO BE SEN'I' TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
ATTN: J�IIGH,I�L [�. �okr.fp�,C� Shannon Corin
701 Dexter�1ve N, Ste 200 City Clerk
Seattle, WA 98109 345 Sixth Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
CONTRACT MODIFICATION #t4 2
Contract Number 5475
Contract Number: 5275
Vendor: GR.AY & OSBORNE, INC
Subject: Consultant Agreement Lower 4Vheaton way
Department: Engineering
File Class: LEG 12-1
Begin Date: 8/21/2013
End Date: 12/31/2015
Review Date: 1/1/2015
Vault Date: 2015
Comments: Supplemental #1 5/13/14; Supplemental #2 9/30/14;
Supplemental #3 12/16/14
� �
Transportation Improvement Board
� � Consultant Supplemental Agreement
�}
Agency Bremerton Project Number 5-2-152(025)-1
Project Name Lower Wheaton Way(Manette Bridge to Lebo Boule�ard)
Consulting Firm Gray 8�Osborne, Inc.
Supplement Phase Supplement No. 3
The Local Agency of Bremerton, Washington desires to supplement#he design agreement
entered into with Gray &Osbome, Inc. and originally executed on August 21, 2043.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this
supplement.
The changes#o the agreement are described as follaws:
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the Completion Date
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLETION DATE ! December 31, 2015
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated herein, please sign and date in
the appropriate spaces below.
Agency Signature Date
� � . � 1z /6 za�
Con ultan Si nature Date
� ^ I 2- ! �7 Z�l
Page 1 of 1
Contract Number: 5275
Vendor: GRAY & OSBORNE, INC
Subject: Consultant Agreement Lower Wheaton Way
Department: Engineering
File Class: LEG 12-1
Begin Date: 8/21/2013
End Date: 12/31/2014
Review Date: 1/1/2015
Vault Date: 2015
Comments: Supplemental #1 5/13/14; Supplemental #2 9/30/14
e'v-1,ey- 9W
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Consultant Supplemental Study Session Date: August 13, 2014
Agreement (Lower Wheaton Way Bridge-to- COUNCIL MEETING Date: August 20, 2014
Bridge Trail Project)—Supplement No. 2 Department: PW&U
Presenter: Chal Martin
Phone: 473.5758
SUMMARY: The City signed an agreement for design services with Gray& Osborne, Inc. on August
21, 2013 for the Lower Wheaton Way Project at an original cost of$187,480. In discussions with the
funding agency, additional design features were added into the project and an initial budget for
construction support was established. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 included these costs for
$30,000 and was signed on May 20, 2014. Also found during design was the poor condition of the
culvert in Schley Canyon. Based on initial consultation with Department of Fish and Wildlife and
Suquamish Tribe, City staff wishes to retain Gray& Osborne for a pre-design effort of the culvert and
additional construction services support. Supplemental Agreement No. 2 was prepared and consists
of:
1. The preparation of the pre-design report for the Schley Canyon Culvert Replacement (see
Scope of Work in the attached Supplemental Agreement) in the amount of$30,000.
2. The construction support services needed on a limited "on call' basis during the construction
phase of the project (see Scope of Work in the attached Supplemental Agreement) in the
amount of$20,000.
The new total for the contract is $267,480.
ATTACHMENTS: Consultant Supplemental Agreement#2
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The cost for the predesign effort will be coming from
the Stormwater fund, and the construction support services will be divided with the distribution of
22% from the Stormwater fund, 6% Sanitary, 3% Water, and 69% from the Street funding of the
project.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ❑x No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: 0 Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consultant Supplemental Agreement for
Supplement No. 2 with Gray & Osborne, Inc. for the Lower Wheaton Way Project and authorize the
Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as
presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: [R/Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 01/25/13
i
TRANSMITTAL
I
FINANCIAL SERVICES
City Clerk/Shannon L.Corin -5323
shannon.corin@ci.bremerton.wa.us ax 360 473200
5 6th Street,Suite 600
remertDn.WA 98337-1873
September 30, 2014
Gray& Osborne, Inc.
701 Dexter Ave N, Ste 200
Seattle WA 98109
RE: TIB Consultant Supplemental Agreement—Supplement No. 2
Lower Wheaton Way(Manette Bridge to Lebo Boulevard)
I have enclosed your fully executed copy referenced above.
Best Regards,
Shannon L. Corin
City Clerk
/sic
Enclosure
cc: File
---------------:.—.--- ------------------- --- -----
. ., ., ;....•,��'`_` .�, ; i Iii
Executive Correspondence Routing Memo
Date: 9/30/14
Project: Lower Wheaton Way (Manette Bridge to Lebo Blvd.)
Description: See attached Supplemental Agreement. This is design supplemental # 2 for the Schley Canon
Culvert Replacement Predesign Report and Limited Construction Management Support Services for the LWW
project. The Supplemental was approved by the Council by the attached Agenda Bill. The cost for the
predesign effort will be coming from the Stormwater fund, and the construction support services will be
divided with the distribution of 22%form Stormwater fund, 6%Sanitary, 3%Water, and 69%from the Street
funding of the project.
Action Requested: Review and Signatures
Originator: Katie Ketterer
Coordination /Approval / Recommendation:
Public Works Manager: Recommended Initials/date'," 3�/—/
U
Public Works Director: Recommended Initials/date I/����G'
Finance Director: Recommended Initials/date V:
7�f�
City Attorney : Recommended Initials/date
Mayor: Approval/Signature
Thi l wk I ,r(" Y
glAra oa,/ by CMZ(,
City Clerk: For Filing 6-P,4
When complete:
Please email a copy of the signed original to Engineering ATTENTION / Katie Ketterer for our files and forward
the second original to Parametrix for their files.
Public Works& Utilities 1100 Oyster Bay Ave.N.,Bremerton,WA 98312*Phone(360)473-5315 * Fax(360)473-5018
Transportation Improvement Board
Consultant Supplemental Agreement
Agency Bremerton Project Number $-2-152(025)-1
Project Name Lower Wheaton Way(Manette Bridge to Lebo Boulevard)
Consulting Firm Gray& Osborne, Inc.
Supplement Phase Supplement No. 2 for Schley Canyon Culvert Replacement Predesign Report
(Schedule C)and Limited "On-Call" Construction Support Services (Schedule A—
Roadway)
The Local Agency of Bremerton, Washington desires to supplement the design agreement
entered into with Gray & Osborne, Inc. and originally executed on August 21, 2013.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this
supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section II, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read
SCOPE OF WORK (ADDITIONAL SERVICES)
1. Schely Canyon Culvert Replacement Predesign Report:
The City has requested a Predesign Report to determine alternative for repair and/or
replacement of the culvert in the fill section of Lower Wheaton Way in Schley Canyon and
potential off-site mitigation to address impacts on fish habitat.
A. Collect and summarize comments from WDFW and Tribal staff on need for and
options of mitigation of adverse habitat impacts.
B. Evaluate alternatives for culvert repair to provide hydraulic capacity and structural
integrity of the culvert. Develop construction cost estimates.
C. Determine impacted areas of habitat in Schley Canyon and estimate off-site
mitigation areas.
D. Prepare a draft and final Predesign Report.
2. Limited "On-Call" Construction Support Services (Based on 130-Workday Construction
Schedule):
A. Provide office support to include preparation and transmittal of correspondence,
telephone, facsimiles, e-mail, memoranda, coordination with City and construction
team, assist City with Contractor-sponsored requests for information (RFIs), etc.,
as directed by the City of Bremerton.
B. Assist City in negotiation of change orders as may be applicable.
C. Assist the City in preparing project closeout paperwork in compliance with state
law and TIB requirements.
Page 1 of 5
Transportation Improvement Board
!' YF Consultant Supplemental Agreement
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the Completion Date
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLETION DATE I December 31, 2014
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A-2
MAXIMUM AMOUNT PAYABLE I $267,480.00
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated herein, please sign and date in
the appropriate spaces below.
Agency Signature Date
O
Cons ulta i ature Date
Page 2 of 5
Transportation Improvement Board
Consultant Supplemental Agreement
EXHIBIT A-2
Supplement No. 2
(Schley Canyon
Supplement No. 1 Culvert Replacement
Original (Additional Design Predesign Report and
Agreement Services and Limited Limited CM Support
Design Phase) CM Support Services) Services Total
Direct Salary Cost $ 50,988 $ 9,228 S15,268 $ 75,484
Overhead
(including Payroll $ 91,779 $16,610 527,482 $135,871
Additives)
Direct Non-salary $ 23,299 $ 286 $ 837 S 24,422
Costs
Fixed Fee S 21,414 $ 3,876 $ 6,413 S 31,703
Total $187,480 $30,000 $50,000 5267,480
Page 3 of 5
Transportation Improvement Board
Consultant Supplemental Agreement
EXHIBIT B-2(CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION SHEET- COST PLUS FIXED FEE)
Prepared by: Date:
Barry Baker, P.E. July 3, 2014
Project:
Lower Wheaton Way (Manette Bridge to Lebo Boulevard) — Schley Canyon Culvert Replacement
Predesign Report (Schedule C)
Classification Hours Rate Cost
Principal-in-Charge 8 X $32 to$58 = $ 448
Project Manager/Engineer 24 X $32 to$55 = $ 1,008
Design/Civil Engineer(s) 96 X $18 to $36 = $ 3,264
Transportation Engineer 0 X $24 to $50 = $ 0
Geologist/Geomorphologist 60 X $28 to $48 = $ 2,400
AutoCAD/GIS Technician 60 X $15 to$31 = $ 1,680
Survey Crew 0 X $43 to$96 = $ 0
Professional Land Surveyor 8 X $33 to$42 = $ 304
TOTAL DSC I $ 9,104
OH Rate x DSC 180.00% X $9,104 = $16,387
FIXED FEE
FF Rate x DSC 42% X $9,104 = $ 3,824
REIMBURSABLE: Printing, Mileage, etc. $ 685
SUBCONSULTANTS COSTS(includes 10%Administrative Overhead): $ 0
TOTAL, SCHLEY CANYON CULVERT PREDESIGN: $30,000
Page 4 of 5
Transportation Improvement Board
Consultant Supplemental Agreement
Prepared by: Date:
Barry Baker, P.E, July 3, 2014
Project:
Lower Wheaton Way(Manette Bridge to Lebo Boulevard)- Limited CM Services
(Schedule A-Roadway)
Classification Hours Rate Cost
Principal-in-Charge _ 2 X $32 to$58 = $ 112
Project Manager/Engineer 56 X $32 to$55 = $ 2,352
Design/Civil Engineer(s) 94 X $18 to$36 = ! $ 3,196
Transportation Engineer 0 X $24 to$50 - $ 0
Technician/Drafter 18 X $15 to$31 = $ 504
Survey Crew 0 X $43 to S96 = $ 0
Professional Land Surveyor 0 X $33 to $42 = $ 0
TOTAL DSC $ 6,164
OH Rate x DSC 18000% X $6,164 = $11,095
FIXED FEE
FF Rate x DSC 42% X $6,164 = $ 2,589
I
REIMBURSABLE: Printing, Mileage, etc. $ 152
SUBCONSULTANTS COSTS (includes 10%Administrative Overhead): $ 0
TOTAL, LIMITED CM SERVICES: $20,000
TOTAL, CULVERT PREDESIGN AND LIMITED CM SERVICES: $50,000
Page 5 of 5
Contract Number: 5275
Vendor: GRAY & OSBORNE, INC
Subject: Consultant Agreement Lower Wheaton Way
Department: Engineering
File Class: LEG 12 -1
Begin Date: 8/21/2013
End Date: 12/31/2014
Review Date: 1/1/2015
Vault Date: 2015
Comments: Supplemental #1 5/13/14
Transportation Improvement Board
Consultant Supplemental Agreement
Agency Bremerton Project Number 8- 2- 152(025)-1
Project Name Lower Wheaton Way (Manette Bridge to Lebo Boulevard)
Consulting Firm Gray & Osborne, Inc,
Supplement Phase Supplement No. 1 for Additional Roadway Design Services, and Limited "On- Call"
Construction Support Services (Schedule A — Roadway)
The Local Agency of Bremerton, Washington desires to supplement the design agreement
entered into with Gray & Osborne, Inc. and originally executed on August 21, 2013.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this
supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section II, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read
SCOPE OF WORK (ADDITIONAL SERVICES)
Support Services (Based on 130 - Workday Construction Schedule)
1. Additional Roadway Design Services:
The City has requested that additional design elements be incorporated into the Plans,
Specifications and cost estimates including, but not limited to: overlay of the Lebo
Boulevard intersection including replacement of ADA ramps, realignment of Lower
Wheaton Way centerline near 18th Street, installation of decorative illumination and
realignment of side street intersections (Marlow Street and Winfield Avenue).
2. Management Reserve Fund for Limited "On -Call" Construction Support Services:
The Management Reserve Fund allows the City to expand the Scope of Work without
seeking an additional and formal Contract Supplement, within the limits and terms as
stated herein. A specific Management Reserve Fund budget has not been identified at
this time.
A. Provide office support to include preparation and transmittal of correspondence,
telephone, facsimiles, e-mail, memoranda, coordination with City and
construction team, assist City with Contractor - sponsored requests for information
(RFIs), etc., as directed by the City of Bremerton.
B. Assist City in negotiation of change orders as may be applicable. For budgeting
purposes we have assumed up to 2 hours of project engineer time for this task.
C. Assist the City in preparing project closeout paperwork in compliance with state
law and TIB requirements.
Page 9 of 4
Transportation Improvement Board
Consultant Supplemental Agreement
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the Completion Date
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLETION DATE I December 31, 2014
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as set forth in Exhibit A -1
MAXIMUM AMOUNT PAYABLE I $217,480.00
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated herein, please sign and date in
the appropriate spaces below.
Agency Signature Date
-45-12d
Consult W ignature Date
Approved as to form:
BREMERTON CITY ATTORNEY
)
By (
Page 2 of 4
_ Transportation Improvement Board
Consultant Supplemental Agreement
EXHIBIT A-1
Supplement No. 1
Original (Additional Design
Agreement Services and Limited CM
( Design Phase Support Services ) Total
Direct Salary Cost $ 50,988 $ 9,228 $ 60,216
Overhead
(including Payroll $ 91,779 $16,610 $108,389
Additives)
Direct Non- salary $ 23,299 $ 286 $ 23,585
Costs
Fixed Fee $ 21,414 $ 3,876 $ 25,290
Total $187,480 $30,000 $217,480
*The budget for the management reserve fund is $0 at this time.
Page 3 of 4
i
Transportation Improvement Board
CID Consultant Supplemental Agreement
EXHIBIT B -1 (CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION SHEET - COST PLUS FIXED FEE)
Prepared by: Date:
Brian L. Sourwine, P.E. April 25, 2014
Project:
Lower Wheaton Way (Manette Bridge to Lebo Boulevard) — Additional Design Services
(Schedule A — Roadway)
Classification Hours Rate Cost
Principal -In- Charge 2 X $32 to $58 = $ 112
Project Manager /Engineer 38 X $32 to $55 = $ 1,596
Design /Civil Engineer(s) 170 X $18 to $36 = $ 5,780
Transportation /Electrical Engineer(s) 4 X $24 to $50 = $ 160
Technician /Drafter 16 X $15 to $31 = $ 448
Survey Crew 16 X $43 to $96 = $ 1,056
Professional Land Surveyor 2 X $33 to $42 = $ 76
TOTAL DSC $ 9,228
OH Rate x DSC 180.00% X $9,228 = $16,610
FIXED FEE
FF Rate x DSC 42% X $9,228 = $ 3,876
REIMBURSABLE: Printing, Mileage, etc. $ 286
SUBCONSULTANTS COSTS (includes 10% Administrative Overhead): $ 0
TOTAL, ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES $30,000
Page 4 of 4
Contract Number:
Vendor
Sub�ect
Department
File Class
Begin Date.
End Date
Review Date.
Vault Date:
5275
GRAY & OSBORNE, INC
Consultant Agreement Lower Wheaton Way
Engineering
LEG 12-1
8/21/2013
2/28/2014
3/31/2014
Comments
' � \ Transportation improvement Board (TIB}
;�}� Consultant Agreement
tis PRO,�cr Ntn,� P�a�cr �(��1 � Design ❑ Construc�on
&2-i52(025)•1
Pi�JECT TITLE & WORK DESCRIP'TiON
Lower Wheatan Way (Manette 8ndge ro Lebo Boulevard)
Pretim�nary arid final des�gn (PS&�, as well as, geotechn�cal, enva•onmentai {SEPA), and bid and awarci sernces
�NSULTANT NAME 8 ADDRESS
Gray & Qsbome, inc. 7010e�der Avenue North, Suite 200, Seaitle, Washington 98109
AGREEMENT TYPE (r�►ec�cone)
❑ wn�a sur� $
� COST PIUS FIXED FEE OVERHEAD PROGRESS PAYNIENT NATE 180%
OVERHEAD COST METHOD
❑ Adual Cost
❑ Ac�uai Cost Not To E�cceed �
� Faed Ha1e °�
FIXEdFEE $2 1A14
❑ SPEdFlC RATES OF PAY ❑ Nego6ated Howry Aate
❑ Pro�nsional Howty Rate
❑ COST PER ItNIT WORK
D8E PARTIqPAT10N WBE PARTIClPA't'!ON
� Yes � No �� � Yes �) No %
COMPLETION OATE f�AXIMUM AMOUNT PAYABLE
Februa 28, 20t4 $187,480
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered u�to tlus �� day of J 2013. belween the Cdy oi Bremerton, Kdsap County, Wa�ur�n�
uo
heremafter �Iled the AGENCY, and the abo�re organ�zation here�nafter ca1�d d�e CON LTANT The TransportaUon Improvement Baard herematter caQed the TIB,
adrrurnsters the fof�g accountss Urban Arte�t Tn�st Accamt t�urcis� T►ar�sporta0� Mprovement Accour� bu�ds, Small Cdy Accounl fiu�, and CftY �R
Ass�stance Account (ur�s.
WITNESSETH THAT
WHEREAS, fhe AGENCY des�res to accompi'�sh the above referenced pro�Ct, w�lh the aid of T1B hu�ds m ccniormanca vwtt► �e n�es and regulaftons prortnd9ated bY the
TIB, and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY does not have �affiaeM stail to meet B�e requued canmd►ttem aM therefo►e deems d adwsable and �smabte to eru�age the as� of a
OOAISULTANT to pmv�de the �ecessary sernces for the PHOJECT, and
WHEEiEAS. the COiVSULTANT �epresents that he/she �s m compGarxe wdh tlie Wastum,�ton State Statutes relatmg to protess�onat re�StraUon, �f applicab�� and t�s
s�grbfied a anllu�gness to tumish Consultmg serv�es W the AGBVCY,
NOW THEREFORE, in cor��JeraUon ai the temu, concfiUons, oaver�ants and pedortnance coM�ned herei4 or at� and �rx�pora#ed and made a pad hereoi, the
parbes hereto ag�ee as foilows
I
GENERAL OESCFiiPTlON OF WORK
The wak under ttds AGRE9WENT shall �r� ot the above descnb� work ar�
sennces as her��n defa�ed and �cessary to acaompl� the completed work br
th�s PROJECT The CONSULTMtT sha8 tum�sh aU �nnces. lab� and retated
eqwPmenl necessary to oondud and �nplete tlre wak as des��ated e�re
m nns AGFiEEMENT
II
SCOPE OF WORK
The Soope oi Work and pro�eCt level of eftort t� Uus pro�ect �s detaded m Exfab�t 8
attad�ed hereto, and by Uns refererxe made a part oi ttns AGR�AEI�IT
n6 Form 190�016
Rev�se;f Oct 2001
Page t ot 24
;o ,Trar�spoRaron Improvemer�t 9oard (T�B)
�' Consultant Agreement
m
GENEAAL RE�QUIR�NlENT3
All � of caadak�on of ihe v�afc ot ilus AGREEMEM� wdh outs�de
�, �aps or ind'nn�als sha� �ve advance a{�rove� bY the A(iHdiClf
Necessaiy cadads ar� mee6r►gs uv�h agemi�es� 9roups a �n�v�luals shau t�
�a�a m�a�r► me a��c�r
The CONStA.TANT sha� aflend 000rt5�tion, Progress and presentation
rr�e6ngs wdh �fe A(iENCY or such Federal, Commwuty, State, Gly a Courriy
ot6aals� 9roups ot �div�d�fs as may be requested �Y the A(ifNCY The
pt�ENC1f a�l pr�de the OONSULTANT s�ent noUce pna to meet�gs
recpero�g C�iSULTAN7 �cipaUon. The mu�m�wn rnimber of haurs or c�ays
r�ce reqwn� shall be ag�eed to b�v�aeen �e AGENCY and iha CONSULTANT
a�d shoa�m m F.�dn'�t B attad�ed hereto and made part ai Uus AGFlEEMENT The
C�ISULTANT shall prepare a montldy Pm9ress rieport� m a fortn approved bY
�e AGEPICY, tl�ai w� outlme m wntten and grapfucal form the varrous phases and
tt� onier af perfortnanoe of tl�e work � suf�.rerd de#ad so that the prog�ess aE ihe
work can easily be evak�ted. Gosis for Disadvar�taged Bu�r�ss E►rte�pr�ses
(DBE�, t�mn'ty Busir�ss C�terplises (lu18E�, and Wmnerwwned &ismess
6derPnses IwB� d recNired s�l be shrnem m U� heading � U�s Agreemer�t.
1Fre engu�al copies of all reporb, PS&E, and other data fturnshed to the
OONSULTANT by ihe AGENCY sha11 be retumed M des�gns, �rawfn9s,
�eafica6ar�, doamrents, and other wo�C producls prepar�i bY the
CONSULTAtdT pna to �rnpletion or tertmnaiwn of this AGREF�IENT are
u�tnunen� ot serv�e tor the PROJECT and are P►apedY o( lhe AGENCY Reuse
by the AGEriCY or by o6�ers act�ng ihrough or on behalf of the AGENCY of any
such mstruments of senr�e� not ooaurn�g as a pa►t of tlrs PFiOJECT, shail be
w�hout Gability of tegat exposrue to the CANSULTANT
iv
TfME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLET{ON
The C4NSULTANT shal{ not begin arry work under the tertns oi Uxs
AGREEMHd'f unUl auU�onzed m wntu�g by the AGENCY. AA wrntc ur�der this
AC3REEMEM sha� be compteied by the date stwvm �n the head�ng of th�s
AGREEMENT under compleUon data
The estab6st�ed �npleUon time shall not be extended because of arry delays
attr�able ta tlle CONSULTANT, but may be exlen�d by tlle AGEtdCY, m the
eve� 01 a delay attnbutab� to ihe AGENCY, or because oi unavadab� delaqs
caused by an act oi GOD or govemmer�aal ad�s or other cor�tions beyond the
cadrol oi the CONSULTAPlT A pnor supplemental agreement �s�ed by the
ACEtdCY �►equ�ced b extend ihe estabf'�shed camplet�on Ume
V
PAYMENT
The CONSt1lTAM shaU be paaJ bY tl�e AGBdCY for �mpleted v�ric amd
se� rendened under dus ACREEMENT as pmhded m E�dubd C at�ched
hs�eto� and by Uus neferern;e made �d of @us AGREEMENT Sud� payment shaq
be fidl cornper�sahon fw work performed or serv�ces r�endered and iar aU tabor,
mater�s, s�Ges� e4wAment� ar� u�adentais r�ecessary to �nptete the wo�C
�f'ied in SecQon fl, Scope of Wak
�
SUBCONTRACTqVG
The AGENCY pemuis sub�ntracts ta ihase �ems ot v�ro�C as shawn in Extdbd G
to th+s Agreemer�. C�npensahon for Uus subcflr�ltar� work shall be based on
the Cost ta�ors sho+nm a� F.xlubd G, attad�ed hereto and hy tius retererxe made a
part of �us ACRE9�IENT
Tne v� a �e s�co�.e�ar►t � � � tn�e � .c�t � �
wdess a pna,� �
A� �e d�eq tabor� overt�ead, c�re.ct rwn-�ry ca� and 6xed fee co�s
ta �e ��I be s�stat�ated m the sam�e rttanr�er as aAl'ured +n
Sedion V. M� exceec�r�g $10,000 � c�s1 shall conta�n aa app�b1e
pro�n�s oi �ns AGREHd1EN7
Tne cflasw.Ta�tr ahail not s�oa�racl ta the pedom�ance a any,NOrk �►der
tlns AGFIEEMFM w�taut � create, between tt� A(iEiV� and
pem�ion for s�cor�rac�ng
subc�hac�or� anYconhact or anyoUierrelahor�luP
VII
EMPLaYMEr1T
ltre c;ONSUI.Uwr wamards amt nelshe nas not emptoyed or reiamea anv
�any er pe�, otF�r tl�ar► a bona fide emPlayee w�n9 �Y fa tl�
(�NSULTANT, to soGat or �� than a t�na d em pl�ee vuor�n9 sde�y ior
to pa�t auN c�nPa�f' pe�
Uie CONSULTANT, acry fee� comrro Qion, per�m dtie awrard a makm9 of Uus
�her �e�abon, c�� W� �
�trad. Fa brea� w vwfal� of Ihs wdrrard, !he AGENCY shail tmve tl� nght
to amnu� dus AGREEMBVT w�►out 6abldy, or m�s �iscrebon, to deduct irom the
AGREEAAEN'C P�e or cons�derauon or olhemnse recover Ihe i�.dt amount oi sucb
tee, ��, P�9e b�9e �� 9�� or co��ent tee.
q� � ap �(�yees � q�e CONSIRTANT or other persons wM1e engaged �n
the perfortnance af any work or sernces �� the COMSUL A rdY a�d n�
AQRffMENT� �aN be cons�dereE empbyees ar�se ur�der anY
ot N� AGENCY� and any and aQ ctaims U�at may or might
Wo►kets C�per�twn Act an behaif of sa�d emptoyees or other persons wh�le
so engaged, and arry and ail cia�s mac� by a tlurd paury as a consep�noe oi
any act o� om►�on on tfre Part of ihe COIdSULTAN'fs er�►loyees or o�er
persons artn�e so e►�gaged on arry of Q�e work � sernces prov►ded to t� rendered
herem, shall be the sole abigat� am! �pons�lih+ of Ihe CONSUI.TANT
The CflNSULTANT sha0 rrot e�age, on a iup ar part Ume ba�s� or othe� ba�s,
durux� the per� ot the contraG, anY Professwna� or techrncal Pe►sonne! who are,
or have been, ai anY �ne durm9 � Penod ot 1he c4Mract� ���th� wnaen
STATE, � Ure AG�ICY, except reg�larly �Ured emploliees,
cor�nt of 4�e pubhc eroPtoyer ot �d�► person
Yill
NONDISCRiN11NATtON
The CONSULTANT agrees rwt to �scnRU�le agamst anY cGerd, emptoyee or
���yment or tor �mces because of race, creed. cotm� natwnal
�n, m�al statu�s� sex, age w ha�cap except tor a bona f� oa�aGor�t
q�'u�On wdh �ard to. but n� fe�ted to the idia�w� employmer� �9�
derrwiron ot tran�er, reCrWhr�erd or any �xiaknerd �ved�n9� �Y� °f
tertrona�or�s, ►ates of paY w other torms oi compensafwn, selec6� for daugng.
re�on of sernces. The CONSULTMIT ru�derstands aruf ag�ees that d�t
wo�tes tlus Ara►+son, �us AGREEMFM may be temunated by the AGENCY and
(wtl�r that dre CONSULT/WT sha� be barred from �domang any ssmoes fw
the AGENCY now or m�e f�une unfess �ed a�d that r�wrrence�o
AG6d(.Y ihat ��rune�ataY Prad�ces
s� a�a w�
p�ng U�e pedomianoe af iMs AGAEEMINi� Ihe C�VSULTAM� for dseli, ds
assgrtees� and suxess�rs m ��dere� agrees as fo8ow�s
A OOMPUANCE WITH REQULATlONS The CONSULTANT ShaA carr�plY
w�1h the Reg�dabons refa6ve to nond�scnmmatron u► the same manner ag m
�B Form 190-018
Hev�d Oct 2�01
Page 2 of 24
� ,TranspoAatfon �mprovement Board (T18)
�t�r Consultant Agreement
FederalN�a�sted Pm9� of the D�M�ent of Tr�� Tdle 49,
Code ot Fede�al f�gutaUons, Part 21, as theY maY ���0t" iane
to bme� {tre��ter �errad to as the Aegu�bons}, w�ach eue he�em
�ted by reference and made a parl ot U�is AGREEME9JT.
NONDISCRIMINATIOrk The CQNSULTAN7'� wiUt re�rd to fhe worlc
perfom�i bY �t d�u�►9 the AGAEEMEM', �I not c�scn►Y►u�ate on the
grauuis oi race, creed �r, sex, age� mardal �tus, �t� ai9� or
hand�cap e�xept for a bona f�e �up�1�� ��" �^ ����
and reterdron ot subconsullards, uuluc5n9 praa�+�'� of matenals arsd
teas� of e�nPme� The CONSUI.TANT strai� rat ParG�Pate e�er c�reclN
or m�irectly m the �r� P�'� �' Sec6on 21.5 of the
Reg�Aatrons, mcludm9 empl�ment Prad�es aA�en the oo�dta� cavers a
Pro9ram sei fodh m Appe�duc N� the Reg�at�.
' SOUCITAT{ONS FOR SUBCONSIH.TANTS� INCLUDING
PROCUREMENTS OF MATERIAt S AND EQUIPMEM 1n aif s�iala�ns
edher by canpeU�ve bx�ncJ a negobaGon r►�ie b71►he COAISULTANT for
arork to � pe�famed w�der a suboor��a�. � or �.►�
materr�Gs or leases ot e4u�mer�, eacl� PotenGai
shan be r�U6ed by i�e CONSULTAM ot ihe CONSt1LTANTs o�galans
w�der ths AGREEMEN'f and ihe Regula�ors rela4ve w nond'�scmrunaUon
on tl�e grounds of race, creed cola, �x, age� ma�al s�tus� rrabonal ongu►
and t�u�dtcap
D INFOFiMAT10N AND REPORi'S The CONSULTANT shall Pra�e a�
u�tomiat�ar► and repods reqw� bY ��°�� °f �'� �
pursuar�t She�eto, and shaB pertr�i access to its books, recards, a°coU�s+
other sources of into�rnatron, ar�i �s iac�i�Ges as �l► � fiarnse wdh such
AGENCY or TIB to be pe�t to ascedau► comP
Regulatrons or c�recdves Where any tnfomtiaUon req�red o� me
CONSULTANT �s m it� exd��re p�ss�on ot another who ia�s or
retuses lo tum�sh tfns mformabon tt� CONSULTIWT sha8 so cerbiy to the
AGFJVCY, or the TIB as apAr�mate, and stiail �t forth what efforls d has
made E� obtam the mformat�
E SANCTI�IS FOR NONCOfVIPUMICE In die eveM of the
C O N S U L T A N' f s n o� e r� ' n� ih the naa�scntt�natron pro�sans of
thws AGtiEE�ENT, the AGENCY sha� unpose such saruiions as d or the
Tran�wdahon Improve►nent �a�d �Y de�� � � a �� e
,r�tuding, but not hmiied to
1 tl�ihhold'�ng ot paYments to the CONSUITAiVT �der Ih
AGREfMMF1dT u�l the C��T� ��' �or
2 t�nceitaUon, iermmafion or suspensror► ot the AGREEMENT, i
whofe or �n par4
INCORPORA110N OF PROVIStONS The CANSULTANT shall
qie provi�ons of paragraphs U+1 ��� ��1 ° �ry �oatVact.
proaxemeMs ot mate�iais and leasas oi �� � e� �+
Re�dallons or �ire.Wves u�d Pursua� thereto The CONSIlLTANT
tal� s�ch adron vmth respect to any s�co�tant or procuremerrt as
AGENCY or the Trat�ortat�at lmpro�rement 8oatd maY � as a
af ento�an9 such p�o+nsro►�s mdudm9 sdnc6or� ia� nonoo
prornded �r� �� m lhe eveM a CONSULTAiVT b�es �
or �s thiesterred with� G6g�on wdh a subcflm.�itant �CY � e�er
such du�ion. the OONSULTANT may reQuesl
such CiUgaUon to proled the ���o er�er mto such �i$abon�tO� P
CflNfSU1.TANT �y reque
it� mtetests of lhe TI&
� p�� rnm�',eced E070-01 and EO ����� of
the State ot WasMngton.
1X
TERMtNATION OF pGREF.�9EM
The rg� �s reserved bY tlle AG�lCY to temiu�ate ths AGREENIEtd'!' at arry iune
u� ten days w�ten noUce 10 the COAlS1N.7ANT
k� the ever� tfis AGREEMEPIT ��rtnatated bY the e�� ��f to U►e
k � ot ihe CONSULTAN'i'� a 1'mal paYm
on the A� F fot ths type of AGRF�IE� u�.
�ULTANT as shown �n E�
No payme� shap � made for arry work oompis�d after ien days to�w°'9 rece�pt
by qre CONStlLTAN'f ot the Nofx� of Temur+a�on. If tl� � P��
made to Ute t�NNSULTANT Prar to Notice ot Ta�n e� ihe lotal
�t that wotdd be due comP�ed as �t fodh heram above� lhen tro fmal
p�yme� shall be due and the CONSULTANT sha� x��Y ��� �
AGENCY tor anY excess Aa�l
!n U�e everd q�e sennces of �e CONSW.TANT are tem�ar�ted b�► � AG�ICY
for tatdt on the part of the CONSULTANT, the above fomu� b� PaYme� � not
eppiy In such an event, the amoimt to be pa� st�aU be detemur►ed bY i�
AGB�iCY anih cansuieratwn gnren 4o the a� cas� v�wrred bY ihe
(�NSULTANT �n perfortrnng the wak to the date of tema�t�a4 ��M ot
to date � ��
v�lc o�igu�aqy requ��d wPnch was sa6�a� n� �usab� to d�s AGENCY at d�e
whether d'�t work is m a torm or a iype �er Tum to
Ume ot teKninat�on� me cost to the AGENCY ot emP�N^9 ����
��nptete the work reqtured and Ute tmie whxh maYbe �� at 1he
other tactors wt�ch affecl the vafue to the nces st�all ���r tivs
tane of temimat�on Under no a�u►nsta
subsecUOn exceed the amouM wfud� would have been made u�n9 t� formuta
m ma�
set fodh �n ihe prevaus {�ara9►�h.
if d �s determmed far arry ceason tl�at the CONSULTNVT � not � defauft or Ihat
lhe CONSULTANTs iadure to pedom► is untl�ut A or its �� f�the
�h� ie� i ao�� � aC��ance w�h the � of this
AGREEMIENT
' In the event ol d�e death a� any membe�, p�r or ofF�� of the C�SULTANT
asssgned to the Pra�d �� ��� °f �
or anY ot its supen�s°N P�'SO�E or dsa�iatpn oi the pm�Y
8 �rU�ers�� temunabon other me�� � Ihe CONSULTANI' he�ebll ��
u�vofu�d e�oY � s�' d Uo do so bY
n c�nptete the wak under the te� � �� � to �' ot the
the AGENCY The subsecb �m�rs ot tl�e CANSUITANT and the
AGREEMENT bet� 1� �""�
a�dude AGEMCY, A tl�e AGENCY sa choose.s.
� �s Gsted m #�e prev� �
� tn 9rie eve.nt ot ihe death of �Y of � SlA.T14NT, vwih � AGENCYs
� �ould tlte �Wn9 me�� 1�s A(iREEM�'f� �� be tt� �
tt� ��erxe, de�re to termir�te � �us �d�n.
�� set fo�lh m tl� second pars9 Ph
� In the eu�rd it� A(3REEMENT �s temunaUed Pno� to c�1e�an, �e �9��
tot �es of a� reports and othe� data, PS&E matenals fum�hed to the
a�to �ULTANT bY the AQEt�C� and do� p�� � tt� �1SU�TANT
� to sa�d tema�t�n� st�ari be�rr►e and ►ertmm t� P�nY °� �e AGENC`!
rotect ��y be us�1 bY it w�hout rest�' Su� �uu� �� �°� �
a part of �ds PROJECT� st�ll be w�OUt �►b ��� Eo the
CptJSULTANT.
G. � R�W 4960180 pwh�Ung ��P�� ��s ar�d the
ns � aoa�2oo�
Page 3 of 24
�
,� TransportaUon Improvement Board (T�B)
,�,' Consultant Agreement
PaymeN for arry part o� 4t� raork b�t the AGENCY sf�ii not oauMute a wanr8r by
tl�e AGENCY � an�r rer�es � any type � may have against tl� �NSULTANT
for any+ bre9Ch o1 Bds AGREEMHVT by tl�e COIJ.SULTANT, or tw ial�ae of the
CONSULTANT to pertom� work reqwred of d by Ihe AGENCY Fosbearance of
arh' m,�hts u�r tl�e AGREEMENT w�l cwt consU'�te wanFer of entitlanent W
exerase tlmse rgMs anm respect to any tuhme act or arns�on by U�e
(�NSULTANT
X
CNANGES OF WORK
The CONSiJLTANT sha6 make such changes and rev�aris m Ihe oanplete mrork
oi Uus AGREEMENT as neoessary� to oo�t er�ors aPpearm9lhe�m, when
►eqmred to do so by U� AGENCY, wnhout addtanal oompensaUa� tl�eof
ShaAd tt�e AGENCY fmd d des�r�le for it� oHm purpases to have p�+rouusiY
sapsiactanly �ed wo�C or parts thereof d�nged or �ev�i, the
CONSULTANT sf�ll make such rev�au as drecbed by ihe AGHVCY This work
st�y � cor�dened as Fxtra W�Ic and w�l be pand ta as herem provided under
Sectan XIV
XI
DISPUTES
�Y �e ��9 �� fad �n connecUon w►�h the work not d�sposed
� by AGREBWgVT beriveen the CONSULTANT and khe AGENCY shall be
�eferted for deterrt�r�adon to the Olrector oi Pubhc 1No�cs or AGENCY F.ngu�eer,
wfrose decis� � the matt� shaq be tinal and bmd�r�g on the parUes ot tFus
AGREEMEWi', provded tav�rever, tfrat d sn acdon is brought challengmg the
D�rector of Publ'ic Works or AG�tCY Engi�ets dec�aon, ihat decf�on sha� be
sub�ect to the �ope ot p�ai rewew � ded under WasMngton Case Law
dENUE, APPLICABl.E LAW AND
PERSdNAL JURISDICTION
in tlie ev�ent tfmt e�ther �rty c�ems �t rrecessary to mstdute Iega! actron ar
proceedu�gs � gn(p►�e any nght or obGgaUOn under tMs AGREEMENT� the
part�es hereto ag�ee that arry s�ch ac�n st�il be ind�ted in �►e Su�nar Coutt of
the State of Wastm�gton, s�hr�ded in the c�wty+ the AGENCY �s located m. The
partres h�eb agree drat all que�rons shall be resolved by apphc'atwn of
Wastur�gta� faw and ttrat lf� parbes to sud� acUon shall have the rgM d appea�
frorn su�s decis�or�s ot ff�e S�enor oaut +n accondar�ce wdh the laws of the Stats
of Waslungton. The �TANT he�eby ca�nts b the pe�sanal }unsd�dron of
the Supenor Court of ihe State ot Was�ur�lon, sluated m ihe cauntyy 1he AGEIdCY
�s located u�.
Xill
LEGAL RELAT�ONS AND INSURANCE
The CONSULTANI' shail cbmply wnth alf Federai, Stab, and Iocaf laws a�x1
or�nanc8s appi'�ab4e b ihe wak to be done under Uus AGREEMBVT Tlus
AGREEM1AENT �aA be mterpreted and �nstnted m accord mih the haws ot
Wastungtan.
The CANSULTMIT sl�fl md�nrnty and hold the AGENCY and the STATE of
Wa�ungton, and th�r a�icers and employees ham�ss from and sha8 prooess
and defend ffi ils owm e�en9e aq clauris, demarnis, or s�nts at law or epu�y
a�ng in rV�1e ar m paR from I�e CONSULTANTs negGgence or breach of arry
of �7s obtigaUOru ur� Ws AGREEMENT, Pnov�ded that nothmg herem shall
requee a CONSULTANF to mdemroiy d�e AGENCY and ihe STATE agam� and
hold harmiess tl� AG6dCY and the STATE irom daims, demands at suits based
s�efy ttpar� the oon�t � the AGENCY and it� STATE, �eir agerds, �ts and
empioyees ar� prowded furlher fhai if the dauns or s�ats are caused by or ++�sult
(ran the concumenl negfigence of (a) the t:ONSULTANT's age�ts or ert�yees
and @) the AGENCY and the STATE, tt�eir agents, afGcers and empfoyea, this
mdemn�1y pro�ns�on wdh respect to {t) claims or swts based W�ors s�u�'►
�gGgence, (2) the costs to �e AQENCY and the STATE of defen�ng such
dam� and �, etc. shail be vand and er�oreeable onty to the exter� of U�
CONSUl.TMIT's ne�igence or @�e neg6gence oi the CONSULTAM's ageMs w
��
The CONSUITANTs �aUOn to the AGf�iCY shail be at all Irrnes as an
uxfepende�t conUador �r ac�ons b►ought bY
The CONSULTANT speaficaUY a�s P��� �'
the CONSULTANT's own employees aga� the AGFSICY and, solelY tor tl�e
Puipo� of th�s u�erm�'tcaban ar� deter�se� 6te �NSUI.TAM speaf�ca�Y
waives am+ tmmtmdy ur�r tl� siate mdu�r�t u�u�ar►ce � purs�u�t
C4NSULTAM �recog�vzes�t�15 ar�d w�s the su�e od 1 muriml �egob�on.
to ihe prova�ans
U�ess otliervu9se speat�ed m lhe AGFtEE(�IIHV7� tl►e AGB�CY shall be
�es(�nsbte tor admin�sba�on ot ao�stnu� conhac�s� +f �� on 1�P�1�
S�ect to the process� � an axeptable� suPp�e� �
COidSULTANT shaA provi� on�caB a� � 1he AaENCY dunng coMract
admeast�aha�. By prowdmg s� a�tar�ce� ihe CONSULTAWT sl�ap assurne no
re�onsbi1�yr far. proper cor�stn�on ted'mi�es, 1ob s�e satety� or a�Y
const�Uon cordraclo�'s fa�ure 6o perfmm its wodc m aacocd�ance vwth Ihe co�rad
documerds.
The CONSULTMf f shail ob�n and keeA m fo�ce d�mng the terms � the
AGREEMENT� w as othenvse re�red� tl�e fdlowmg �su� w�h comparues
or through soutoes approved by the State Iruurar�ce Comrrassanec pu�suant ro
RCW 48.
lnsurance Coverege
A Workers comper�sadon arni empiqr�s Gab�tY msura� as reci�red by Ihe
STATE.
B�eneral cammeraai Nab�ty u►swxnce �n ar+ a�u�1 n � than a su►gle hm�
ot one rtn�iron ar�d OOit00 Dol�rs ($t,�0.�000) tor bod�y in1uN� u►dud�ng death
and propedy dama9e Per ooc�rnence
�p�n9 � Wodcers Comperuatwn �suraru� and arry Professional Uab�'dy
snsurarxe seaued by the COIdSULTAtdI', Nie AGENCY w,I► be named an a�l
cerGf�cate.s ot mswance as an ad�a► u�ed. The CONSULTANT shail furtnsh
the AGENCY uwth venixadon of msuranoe and erdorsemerds re4uued
AGREEMEN7 The AGENCY re �� ms�ua►�ce
c�qes of aU requrced tnsutance po1
shai! be Arnnary and nor+•c�tr�bt�ory ►�th arry oiher msurance and/or self-
rnsurarxae
Ail msurarx� shail be obtamed from � rne C�iSULTMtT st►all �b do
busu�ss �n the State � Wasiw�On
yenficahon ot u�rd�nce as a�ined a�ue w�hu� 14 days of tl�e exeadron�
AGREEMEPiT to the AGENCY No carxeilatwn of ihe foregoin9 po
effecUve without thuty {�) days P� notcce to the AGENCY
The CONSULTANTS prolesaonai Ga�tY to the ACa9+lCY shall be Gmded to 1he
amount payabla under tlas AGREEMENT or a� miA�on dot�rs, whxhever � ihe
greater ttt�ess mod�f�d by Exta'bit H. In no case shaA the CANSUL�ANTs
profess�onal 6at�ly to thrci parUes be lunitsd n arry waY
The A(iENCY wUl pay r�o progress payme�is tader SecUon V ur�l Ihe
COtdSULTMiT has tutly comPf�d vwth tMs sec�on. ltas remedll � noi exdusnre,
and ihe AGE�dCY and the STATE may talae �cti otlier acUon as �s avadable to
fhem under aU� prov�+or� of thas AGREEMENT, or oihen�se m taw
XtY
EXTRA WORK
A i'he A(3ENCY may at anY Ume, bY wnrien order� make char�'n� 1�e
general scope of tl�e AGRE8y18VT m the sem� to be peAom�ed.
�B Form 190-016
flsvsed � 2001
�eao�2a
� Tra,r�sportaiwn Improvement 8oard (TIB)
�'' Consultant Agreement
B p a�t sud� c�ar►ge cau�s an mcrease or �crease m the estar�ated cost of,
ot droe t¢ne Bqwred tot� Pedortnance of arry paR of the wo�1c w�der tln.s
AGf�EMENT, whether or not d�anged by the arder, or othennnse a(f�s
any od�er term.a and cor�hOns of the AGREEMBdT, the AGENCY shall
make an ec�utable a�jastment m Uie (1) mawmum amouM pay�le, (2)
del�ery or c�mpleUon sd�edu�e, or both, and {3) other affeaed terms ar�d
shaU ma6Ey the AGRF.ENIEP(T axorrbr�glY
xvo
CER7'1fICATIO(d OF TIiE
CONSULTAPR ANO THE AGEtVCY
Aitact�d he�eto as Fadtib� A-1, are ttre Cerhfii�6ons ot the Cflns�ant and the
A9�Y
XVIII
COdEPLETE AGREEMENi'
C The (�NSULTMIT musl s�mit amr proposal for adusbnent (hereafler
�eferred to as pr+oposa� under ths cl�e w�1Mn 30 days from tl�e date of
m.ceipt oi U�e wmaen order Hoa�ever, � the AGENCY deades ihat Ure facts
�u6iy it, the AGENCY may receive a�nt act upon a proposai s�mdted
betore faml payment af Um AGREEMEM
D Faawe to agree ro arry adjustmer� sl�p be a�pute under the �
clause However nottur� m Uus dause shall exaue d�e CANSULTAM
(rom p�eedmg wdh die AGREEMENT as c�nged
E Notsmdt�'u►g tl� terrr� and con�l� ot paragraPhs (a) and @) above,
the rtmxirnum amount payabie for th�s AGRE£MENT, shall not De axre�ed
or oor�dered lo be Encreased except bY specrfic w�lten supplement ro Uus
AC�REEMB3T
XV
EIdDORSEMENT OF PLANS
Ttre COMSULTANT shatl pEace tns er�orsement on all plans, estuur�ates or arry
othef ertgEneermg data lurt�shed bY XVI
TIB AND AGENCY REVIEW
The AGENCY and T!B shaff have d�e nght ro parhppate m ihe re�new or
e�mma6on of the work in progress.
Th�s c�c�rnent and re(erenced attad�metds t�mair�s ait covenar�, st�W1�
and prov�ons agreed upon bY �►e Par�s No �ent� oT reP►ese►�Uve ot e�her
p � a��y �o mal�� and the parbes sha{I irot be bound bY or be 4able tor,
� ���� �ahon, prom�se a agreemeni rwt set foAh herem No
char,ges� amer�ments, a moe'd�catro � the iertns t►ereot s��dro �s
reduced to aw�g ar►d s�ed 5Y pe�
AGAEEMENT
XIX
EXECUTION AP1D ACCEPTIWCE
� oi r�rtuch �ali deemed to� � or� ��3 �� f ��� �
CONSULTMiT does herebY raUtY and adopt ati statemerds, represeMahons,
v�arrartbes, covenards, and agreemerds cor�ned m the proposat, and tt�
s�porqng mate►�S s�uttea by ►he c�Alst�rarrr, and does nereby a«�P�
the AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terrns arni cor�hans thereoi
in wdness whereoi the parLes hereto have exec�ed ih�s AGREEMENT as of the daY and Year ���
1 1 �... � �- ..
gy �r
Tim Osbome, P E, V�ce Pres�denUPnnapal �
Consuftam Grav & Osbome Inc �aty af Bre.rr�edon
n 8 Forrn 190-Ot6 Page 5 ot 24
fisv�d 0� 2001
' � � Transportation Improvement Board (TIB)
j �'�;` Consultant Agreement
EXH161T A-1
Pr�t No
8-2-152(02�-1
Certification of Consuitant
�
C�tyr of Bremertan, lGtsap Camty
I hereby csrbEy that i am Timoihy J. Osbame, P E, a duly authonzed reFuesentaUve of tlie firm of Gray & Osbome, Inc wh�e address �s
701 Dexter Avenue North, S�ute 2a0, Sea�le, Washington 98109 and that nedher i nor the above firm I here represer� has•
(a) Employed or �etamed for a�mm�on, percentage, brokerage, c�ntmgent fee or other cflns�deratron, any firrn or person {other than a
bona fide empioyee vvorkmg �lely for me or the above COAfSULTMI'�) to soCtat or secure th�s conlract.
{b} Ag�eed, as an express or unp�ed cond�tron for obtam�ng this contract, to emptoy or Tetam the sennces of a fi►m or pe�n in connecUon
�nth carrymg out the c�ontract.
{c) Paid, or agreed to �y, ta any firm, organizat�on or person {other than a bona fide employee worica�g solelY Em �� �e cannad,
C01dSULTANT) amr fee, contnbuhon, donaUon or cons�deratwn of any tand for, or �n connecGon mth proairn'ig a► carMn9
except as here expressly stated ('�f any}
I fu�ther oer�fy ihat the firm i hereby represent � authonzed to do business �n the State of Washmgton and that the �irm �s m full compl�ance w�th
�equnements of the Board of Profe�onal RegisUa�on.
l acknowledge that ih�s cer�f�ate �s to be avadable to the Transpartation Improvement Board (TIB} �n connec�on w�ih th�s contract irno�vmg
pamc��at�on of 116 tunds and �s sub�ect to ap�icat�ie State and Federai laws, both cx�msnal and cro�
�,°� Z(o - Za t 3
!!�
11 `
Sg�na�re— V'�ce Pre�den�
Certification of Agency Official
I here6y cer�fy that I am the AGENCY Otficral af ihe Ciry of Bremedon, Washmgton and that the above consult�g firm or h�slher representaUve
has not been reqwred, da�e�tly or mdirec�ly as an express or unp�ed cand�bon m connection �nth obtammg or carrye�g out ih�s contract to.
(a) Emplay or reta�n, or agree to empiay or retau�, any firm or person, or
(b) Pay or agree to pay to any fum, person ar organization, any fee, oontnbuLon, danatron or consideratron of any land, except as here
expressiy stated (if anY)
I ack�owledge that th�s cert�ficate �s to be ava�able to tl�e TIB, in connedwn with this contraci �rohrm9 Pafiapa�n of'�B �� �d � sub�ect
to applicable State and Federal �ws, both cx�minal and cnnl �
�-z�-i3
�
�B fOrm 190-056
tiav+sed Qc� 24Q :
Page 6 ot 24
� TransportaUon lmprovement Board (TIB)
(�- Consultant Agreement
EXH{BIT B-1
Scope of Work
��
oe�be the scope ot walc
The C�r vf &emerton, uu�fh financEa! ass�stance (grant) irom the Washington State Transporta#�on improvem�t Board (Ti6), de�res to
enprove a porhon of Lower Wheaton Way, more par6cularlyr a 0.93-m�e sechon �f roadway from Manette Bndge to Lebo Boulevard
The ewstmg roadway has v�sibie signs of surface cracks and patches Exishng sidewatks on botl� sides of the street are broken. The
ex�sbng roadway cons�sts of ivuo travef lanes w�th curbs and sect�ns of sidewalk Tt� ex�sdng {�vement width �s 36-feet w�de (face of cxub
to face of aub) The �ntent of th�s proJed �s to rehab��ate (plane and overNaY) the ex�tm9 ioadwaY and �nstal� new c�s and sidewalks.
Where required, �salated secGons of the ex�sting roadway pavement w�ll be removed and replaced
The new typ�l roadway c�oss section wql be 34-feet wide {face of a�uYb to tace of an�) and mdude two eadh 12'foot-'w�de travel lanes,
5doot bike lanes, cflnc�ete curbs, and 10•#oot-w�de conaete sidewalk on ihe we,sterty sde of the road. AdcGhonaliy, certam sechons of
5-foot s�dewalk anll be located on the easteriy side of the road and it underlying sa� are found to be appropnate sflme sec�tons of s�dewalk
may be perv�ous. Overhead uhf�Ges w�q rema�n The pro�ect wnli also mdude c�d�at stub�s for fut�e figh�ng�ounchahons, and stotm
drainaqe unprovementslenhancements The pro�ect w71 not u�clude traffic signalaat�n, nght-of-way acq�tts�hon, nor ssgnrficant landsc�ping
or imgatron A wanant analys�s wdl be compteted for the ex�stmg Lebo Boutevard h�affic s�gnal Sxlewalks will be �canstructed as requ�red
to meet ADA req�oremenls. S�gnmg and street channeluaUOn a�ll a�o be prov�ded
The Lower Wheaton Way nght-oE-way contams stormwater management systems wrth an outfa(i to S�ncia�r in(et The outfall ptpe � of
unknown condihon and the dramage pipe �s pNaced at or very near the surface of the ex�ng hdl slope The proposed stormwater
outfail portion ot the pra�ect (Schedule B} is to design a system ihat vv�ll collect and convey the stormwater runoff flows, p�otect the
hdlside nom erosron, and prowde ad�uate energy dispersion at the outlet. The des�gn also �nciudes design of systems to meet the
current ed�Gon of the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Westem Washingtan
requ�rements for the road unprovement prqeci.
The Consultar►t will perfortn the tasks and work needed to des�gn the pro�ect, and develop the plans and speuficat�ons for pro�ect
biddmg and constructwn. The pro�ect iasks may mclude geotechrncal mveshgatron, hydrologiclhydraul�c analys�s, perm�t assistance,
prelumnary des�gn, f�nai design plans and spec�icat�ans
A new 6-�nch duchie iron waterlme (Schedule C) �nll be mstalled on Marlow Avenue (Wheaton Way to East 13� Street) and on East 13m
Streeet (Mariow Avenue to Wheatan Way) Mew sennce 6nes w�n a�so be uistall� (meters to rema�n)
lfiless othennnse dvected and approved by the C�r and the TiB, the project vu�a be designed u� oor�Ormance �nth the 11B grant apphcabon
(FY 2012 Pro�ect) A cultural survey, as mandated by the Washington State DeparCmem af Archaeobgy and N�stancal Presen�ation
(DAHP) �s Imown to be required as th�s bme The City wiU contract separately for this work bY others
tt is the �tent of ihis Cont�act to develop one set of constructbn documen� (PS&� products that +�nil mdude tha pro�ect� Schedute A—
Lowe� Wheaton Way Improvements (Manette Bndge to Lebo Boulevar� alsfl Imown as TIB ProJec� �o &2-152(a25}i, and Scfiedu� 8—
Storm Drama� 4utfaU, and Schedule C— Schtey Canyon Culvert Pre-design, Schedu�e D— San�tary Sewe� �mProvemer�ts� and Schedule
E- Lower Wheaton Way Water System Improvements
DF�lGN SERVICES
(lt is the mtent of th�s sc�pe to genera�y+ compty rroith the unprovements �de�f'�ed m the City's TlB grant apphc�afion, as weil as �mply wdh
C'iiy Standards and Ti6 fun�ng requaements.)
Task 1— Pre�ect Management
Provide overall pro�ect management serv�ces a�dud'�ng:
{1) PreparaUon ar�d exea�on of su�onVacts,
nB Form 180-016 Page 7 of 24
Rev�sed Oci 2001
� Transportarion improvement Board {77B)
�(�J' Consuttant Agreement
(2) Pro��t staff and subcons�tant management,
{3) Implementahon of qua�ty co�'ol pro9ram, and
(4) Managemer� of �xo�ect budget and schedu�e
Prepare and submit progress repurt v�th monlhN �nvo�ce
T�k 2 — Geote.chnical Malysis {Roadwey)
A Subc�r�tract and 000rd'mate geotechrncal work w�th a qualfied and f�censed geotechnxai firm
Rewew and c�nment on subc�nsuitant sut�n�tals
Provrcle these add�donat sernces rna our geot�►n�cal subconsultant, PanGEO, Inc
(1) Stle Reconnaissance — PanGEO unll conduct a reconnaissance along the pro�ect ai�gnment to oaserve
swiace cond�tions that could impact the proposed unprovements Dunng the reconna�ssance, we wnll
mark test bonng locahons for utdity laca#es, and evaluate equipment access to dnll our test barings (ses
ltem 2, below).
(2) Subsurface Exploration — Dniimg a total of four test bonngs for this project The bonngs w�ll be dnlled to
a depth of abaut 12 to 15 feet The test bonng locattons wdl be �ointly determmed on a later date v�nth
G&0 and the C�iyr 'me proposed test bormgs wdl be dniled usmg hollow stem augers The dniied holes
w�l be about 12 mches m diameter Sod samples wiii be obta�ned from the test bor�ngs at 2•t 12 and 5-
foot depth intemals, using Standard Penetra�on Test (SP"� method When completed, the test bor�ngs
wdl be backhlled Whe�e bo�gs unll be dnlled through the exis�ng pavement, the bormgs will be
patched with concrete the thickness oi the roadway
Pnor to the dnlimg, we wnii contact Ihe i-call center to request a utihty locate We will coordu�ate all �ieid
activitres unth Gray 8� Osbome (G&0) and City persannet.
Assumptions
PanGEO understands that, �n addit�on to our prypos te� wdl�ut�irze the results from
12 add�honal pavement cares of the exisUng pa
the pavem�t cores to our pavement evatuat�on,
PanGEO assumes that a nght-of-way perm�t w�H be prov�ded at no cast; and
PanGEO wdk prowde traffic control durmg drdi�ng.
(3) Laboratory Tests — Laboratory tests wdl be conducted on representaGve sod samples Spec►ficaity, �re
budget 15 grain s�ze tests from our four test bonngs. The test resufts w�ii be used to evaluate the
infiltrahon charader�sbcs ot the site sods, based on the procedure outlined in the 2012 DOE Stomiwater
RAanuat Other tests may mciude naturai mo�sture cantents and Atterberg Innits.
{4) Meetmg — One meetmg at the G&0 oHice to discuss fmdmgs.
(5) Engineenng and Report — Perform engmeenng evaivaaon to assess the mfil�adon charactensUcs of the
s�te sods, and pavement rehabditabon opUons A draft report wdi be prepared and subrn�ted to the
pro�ect team for review The draft report �nll be rewsed and fmal¢ed once we receive rev�ew comments
from the project team. In general, the �eport w�ll inctude
A s�te map w�th approx�mate banng and pavement core locahons,
and
�B fortrl 190-018 raga o w��.
Revlsed Oct 200i
� Transportatwn Improvement Board {TIB)
L'(�� Consuitant Agreement
. A summary of existmg pavement thickness, based on pavement cores to be compieted by the
C�ty,
. Recommendations for pavement overlay, based on the s�te sod cond�s, ex�sbng pavement
th�ckness, existmg pavement cond�tions, and traffic data (ro be provided bY others;
. Assessment of site sods for inidtrabon and, if appropnate, prowde design �n�(trat�on rate based
on grain s�ze d�stribuhan,
. Recommendations for s�dewalk subg�ade preparatwn, and
. Earthwork recommendations includmg the sudabd�ty of the sde sods as structural fill, subgrade
preparatwn, temporary excavation, and general earthwork d�scx�ssrons
(6) Post Report Consu{tation — Provide post repoct consultat�on on an as-needed bas�s
Task 3— Communit�t and Agency Coord(nation
A. Su�part staff at two pub�c "open house" meeUngs The Cdy shall lead the meehng ar►d arrange for the meetmg time
and locabon
B Pa�bapate at up to iwo additwna{ pro�a.ct meehngs with C�y stait to rev�ew proJect, pro�ect concems, status of
de6verables, budget, cr�hcal path �tems, any new pro�ect cancems, etc , dunng the oourse of the pro�ecl
Task 4— Quabty Ass�uanceJ(#ua��h+ Control Meetings
A. Conduc� three m-house quality assurance/quality controt (QNQC) meebngs durmg the course of the prolect The
mee�ngs will take place at the approwmate 35, 70, and 95 percent status The meetings wn'� �ndude rev�ew by
qualfied senar staff inembers, key des�gn team members, and Agency staff (as requiredldes�red)
tncorporate per�nent rec�mmendaGons and suggest�ons mto bidiconstrucbon documents regardng QAIQC rewews
Task 5— Project Fundu�g Agency Coordinatton
A G8�0 staff shail coord'inate ihe�r work (as appfic�bfe}�a�s � a a� �y repo�s, and �er � �� agency
{f16) and ass�t the City m preparmg pro�ect prosp
paperworic.
Task 6— R�ght-af Way and Topographical Survey {by City of Bremerton)
A, The C�ty of Bremerton has completed stuvey and mappu�g of the street pro�ed comdor Th�s mforrnation, aicludmg
venc�al and honzonia{ centrol wdl be prov�ded to G&0 for their use for this pro�ect My adc�twna� survey mfortnation
requ�red for design v�ll be �btamed by G&0
Nate• Gray &�bome, Inc. shall be enhtled to rely on the accu�acy of infamabon prowded by ihe C�ty ior the (n�►pose ot th�s
wwk.
Task 7— Coric�ptual and Pretm�inary Design
A. Develop prei�mmary concepts (35 percent levei of design} and sxh�bds for use �n publ�c meet�cj, staff meeUngs, etc.,
for evaluatlon and oomments on c�onceptual desu�r► Conceptua� ptans an�� evaluate, m parhcu�ar, Pavemer►t
rehab'I�a�on and �econst�uchon, parkmg aftemahves, sidewalk altemaWes, new stortn ou�a�� (Sct►ed�le 8) and water
system anprovements (Schedule C), �ngresslegress, and nght-of-way impacts.
B Incorporate avadabie ut�ty as-budt or record drawing mformahan, plat map {properry Imej �nformatwn, survey data, and
othar ava�lable and relevant �nformaUon into the base map Consultant shaif be abte to reiy on �nformaUon provuied by
�B Foftli 190-016 rayc a v, ��
RBV�f �'1'�'Jv i
.� 'fransportafion fmprovement 9oard (1'IB)
�'E� Consultant Agreement
the G1ty for the mterxied purpose of devel�ng design
C. P�epare specdicabons �n WSDOT and Aty -aPProved format sani�ar to previous trans�rtat►on pro�eds designed by tlie
C�y. This w�l mdude, but nat be hm�t� to, pnoposal, c�ntract, bonds and insurance documentslrequ�eme►ats and
related documentat�n.
D. Desrgn storm dramage faciGUes br the col�c6on, treatmeM (as app6�bie), and canveyanc8 of starmwate�' suff�ent to
suppo�t the "prqecC' and pec appl'�cable Oepartment of Eoology and C�y standards C�y to prov�de ver�at�a► (T1�
u+spection) of ex�ng storm conveyance �nes c�ndrtan m order ta help determ�ne starm line replacement
requirem�is The design shall also oonsaler the �orporatron of pervrous concrete sidewalk where #easi'ble to meet
the mtent of pro�ect LiQ requirements
E. Prepare preUmmary pians, drawnngs, speaal deta�is, etc•� of au mo�onzed and non-mota�zed fac��b� inciuudm9 r�d
anprovements, m�nor lanclscapmg, storm fac�h� �uminatior+ (cond�ac onry) and related fac��es at 35, 70 and 95
pett�nt teve� of des�gn, and m City�approved fortnat ro mdude u� � en�g �, � C'ns�cbo�nvc�s�t ��m at
Subm�t (iwo copies) plan sets and specficat�s f nciudm9 W�
35, 70 and 95 percent mteroals incflrporate appvcable Gty c�mn►ents
Task 8 — Stormwater 4utfail
Subtask 8.1— Geotechnicai tnvesUgation
The geotechn►cal scope of work �s I�sted by tasks as determmed by predesign recommendations and fieid
investigations The geotechmcal tasks I�sted beiow are anUcipated G&0 wili submit �nvoices onty for actual work
completed
1. Irnestigate and rev�ew ex�s�ng regional and toc�al geologic mformation, reports, and studies �etevant to
the pro�ect design The pro}e�t may be located in an area w�tfi poor sub-surface soils
2. Perform onsite geologic investigaUons to identrfy subsurface cand�Uons that may affect p�o�ect des�gn
and cons�uct►on. nnll one test bonng to about 15-feet deep near the top af the slope, at the locahon
where the proposed outfail p�pe may be anchored The purpose of the test bonng �s to provale sod
informat�on #o design the pipe anchor The proposed test bormg wdl be dnlled usmg ho{fow stem augers.
The drdled hole wili be abaut 12 inches m d'�ameter. Sod samples v�nll be obtained from the test bonngs
at 2-1/2 and 5•foot-depth mtemals, us�ng Standard PenetraUon Test (SPT) method The consuultzant shall
provide all necessary equipment and operators for ihe geotechrncal irnrestiga�on Ground elevahon will
be surveyed at bonng locations artd cflordmated w�th the surveyodcnr8 des�gner �Il surfaces shall be
restored following geotechrnca! mvestigat�ons
3 Geo•techmcal Report The resutts of the Geo-techmcal tnveshgahon wip be prowded m a bound report
The Consultant uudl submit an unbound draft copy for C�ry review and comments. The Geatechnical
Report wdl rndude the followmg
a. A summary of the regiona! geologic mformatwn,
b. A descnpbon of the onsde geoiog�c mvesagahon, equ�pment, methods, and testmg performed
c. Site spec►�ic geolog�c informaron sud� as site map, bonng locatlons, bormg bgs, water
elevations, sad samples, and sod analys�s resutts.
d Analys�s of the geolog�c infamaUon and recommendat�ons tor pro�ect consVuchon
e Recommendations for dewatenng, sol stabildy, shormg, bearm9 strength, trench excavatwn,
potent�al need for pipe anchonng, foundaUon, andlor support depend�ng on matenal propose�i
by the civd designer, p�pe bedd'm9, and trench backf'il{
T�s Form 190-�16
Page to oi 2a
••� Rev�sad Oc� 2CC1
� Tsanspo►tatwn Improvement Boasd (TIB)
�t� J� Consultant Agreement
The Geo-techrncai Report w�ll be ava�able to b�dders with aU of the Geo-techrncal Report ex�uded m the
pro�ect bai document
The Cansuitant v�nll provide iwo bound cop�es of the fmai Geatechn�cal Report and one unbound copy.
The Consultant wtii provide an elsctron�c c4py (MS �Narc1I of the final �eport, a� graphs and tabtes, and
any other �nformation contained m ihe finai repo�.
Two generai options are being c;onsuiered as of the wrding of th�s scope of wark. The �irst opiion �s for
the outfali p�pe to be anchored at the top af the slope and pfaced on the surface af the biuff The c4st
esGmate for the geotechrncal sub�nsuitant �s included in the fee estunate The s�c;ond option �s to
dir�Uonalry drdE a pipel�ne to Just above the ordmary high water mark at the beach. � � a► w���
require greater geotechn�cal invesbgatron and the cost for that is mduded m the geo
subcbnsuitant proposal but is NOT mciuded m the stormwater design fee estanate if the directional
dnlling �s pursued, the add�honai tmst wauld be addressed in an amendment b the engmeermg serv�ces
c�ntract
Subtask 8.2 — Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analys�s and Report
A. Rev�ew ex�s�ng hydrologic information that will impact the storm system des+gn and perform hydrolog�c and
hydraulic model�ng to desi� the new storm system. The hydrologic and hydraul�c work wrtl mclude the foilowing�
1 Revrew ex�sfing and future hydrology for the pro)ect area mclud'mg u�tream V�butary flows• Review
ewshng hydrolog�c reports for the area, and develop a WVIIHM hydrolog�c mode� tor ex�sGng flow
condihons Peak flows for ex�sting oonditions for the 6-monih, 2-,10-, 25- and 100-year starm wil! be
developed.
Check capac�► usmg Manning Equahon and review energy dissipahon of drainage outfali
Subtask 8.3 — Storm System 4utfali Design
A. Us�ng the cesutts from the Geotechnical, and Hydtaul�c Tasks deta�led above, the Cansuitant wtiA develop the
des�gn tor the new stonn system The C�ty antiGpates that the new storm system anli discharge at or near ihe
exESting discharge point The Scope of Work assumes that replaced sroim pipe wdt be at a near �e surface and
HDPE p�pe and apptopr�aie anchors vudl be used dunng cansirucGon if poor or wistabis sub-surfac� sods that
require sp�al engmeermg des�gn are discavered within the pipe altgnment, an addendum to the Eng�neenng
Agreement �nll be negotiated.
The des�gn +uo�k wdl �nclude the folloNnng•
Rev�ew the physicat and hydraulic mformatlon and evaluate design a4temaUves for a repfacement storm
system. Meet w�th C�ty to discuss des�gn alterna�ves and choose the preferred aitemabve.
The tocat�on of pubi�c and pr�vate uGi�Ges, and potent�al u6t�ty confl�cts, uwil be mvest�9ated tar the design
Pothohng �s not anficipated for th�s pro�ect if pothoimg �s requ�red, the Consuitant wiN notrfy the Gty and
the Giy w�ll dete�rnme rf locatronslut�dies need to be pothaled,
gubtask 8.a — Enviranm�tai Revie�ru and Permit Assistance
A. Perm�Gng �s expected to occur eary m the t�st fialf of the praject. The perm�tbn9 work rowN i�dude the followmg�
1. Determ�ne what State and Federal Perm►ts (�f any} may be needed for the {xo�ect.
Prepare drafts of local, Siate, or Federaf permit applical�ons Provide expert analys�s and
figures!'mformatron as needed for the permits.
The Consuitant w�ll prepare the Environmental Checklist and perm�t appNcairon forms and subm�t to the
Citv for review The Gty v�nil supplement the enwronmentai sect�ons of the Environmental Checkfist, rf
�$ Form 190-076 �g@ "v""
�ev+sed C� 2tf0 �
� t Transportatwn Improvement Boarci (T�81
��` Consultant Agreement
ne�led and submit checkl�st and 3596 des►gn plan set to review agencies for approvai
A Jomt Aquat�c Resource Permit AppGcabon (JAAPA) �nA be �xepared for Gty subm�ttai to Wash�ngton
pepartment of F�sh & Wildlifs {WDF1M, Washmgton Department of Ecology (Ecology), and US Army
Corps of Engineers (COE�. lf a we�ands m�dgabon ptan �s required, +t shall be considered add�onal
work and an addendum to the Engmeedng Agreement v�ll be negot�ated
Su6task 8.5 — Fsh Survey of Schley Canyon
A Conduct a fish survey as typxally required by WONR, WDOT, and WDFW to determine fish presence or absence
in appro�umately 3,000 feet of sVeam channel w�thin the Gty of Bremerton, Washmgton Th� task alsa includes
tapograph�c survey of the culvert mverts and stream d�annel downstream of the Lower Wheaton Way culvert This task
assumes there �mll be one meeting with regulatory agenaes to discuss ihe survey find�ngs
Subtask 8.6 — Culvert R��rlReplacemerrt Predesign Anaiysis and Alternatjvve De�relopment
A, Gather and develop informaaon on the stream system and aftemadves to p�ovide repa�r or replacement of the
culve�. Existing data �ncludes aenal photographs, ex�stmg survey/aenat informadon, and prewous hydraulic and
hydrologic reports. Altematives wdl include s�ng, construct�on feasb�'ity, peam�thng requ�rements, and cost estimates
for the vanous altemaUves
B Devefop conceptuai plans based on the selected altemahve followmg agency and stakehofder review. These pians
v,n11 mdude conceptual sketches and cross secGons to prowde the Cdy u�nth sufficient informat�on to determme ihe
means for the repan or replacement and plamm�g level cost eshmates.
Task 9—Temporary Construction and Right-of-Way Documentat�on
A ident+�l areas on ad�acent pnvate property where temporary construcdon per�its need to be acqwred to factldate
construcGon Tfiis may �nclude small, parrallel, and a�jacent sinps of land a dnveway areas needed to be
reconstructed and incorporated into proJect documents
Prepare "genend' temporary consWc�on permits fa� City d�sa�uhon arid acqu�sibon as may be required
Note Wght-of-way acqu�s�bon is not anGcipated nor Enduded �n our scope of wodc. If such �s reqwred �t wdl be
negoUated as a supptement
Task 10 — Saniimy System ImprovemeMs
q, The C�ty �s currently rev�ew�ng the ex�sUng san�tary system �n�in the pro�e� Im►�is Video �nspe�on has identrf'�ed
areas of cancem where repairs or replac�ment may be necessary.
B. G&0 wdl �nc�de the design of m-s�tu repair �nthin the cantract set and the appropnate spec�al prowsions Cured �n
plac� pipe u ant�c�pated for the ex�stmg pipehnes unthm the project rim�.
Note. Removal and repiacement of sandary unprovements are not antiapated nor mduded in our scope of work. if
su� methods are required �t wAI be negot�ated as a su�lement.
7ask i 1— Fna1 D�aign Pians and Specificatlons
A. Prepare and submd final (100 perceni) pro�ect plans. spe�CaGons, and cost estanates to inciude evaluat�on and
mc�rporatron of an prevwus and per�nent C�ty andfor funding agency c�mments.
B Prepare and submit �inal SEPA Checklist, Incorporate applicabte Cttyy rev�ew comments to indude suc�� rev�ons or
darific�pons as may be necessitated. C►ty to pro�nde threshoki determ�natan and Pubrists determmat�on as may be
reqwred
final
�B Fo�m 180-016 Page tz o� za
Fiavtsed Qci 2001
-�. Transportatron improvement Board (1'�B?
��% Cansuitant Agreemen#
Board (TIB} conshucUon prospech�s form (UCE brm) to the Ctly and TIB and sohc�t au#honzaUon to b�d ihe �ro�ect
from both the Ciry and TiB
Prepare and ass�st City m subm�ng DOE requrced Conshucctior► Stormwater General Permit (incNde gener�c copy m
Specif'icat�ons re�rding'Yransfer of ooverage° trom Gly to ConVac�or).
Task 12 — Bid Services
A Prepare bid adve►ttsemettt and d�stribute to tuw newspapers (Dady Joumai and Kitsap Sun). Our fees do not mcfude
cosi of publicaGan of advert�semenis
B. Fonnrard b�d package to ARC of Tacoma frn distr�u�on to plan c�nters and bidders.
C Ass�t C�+ v�ih answermg bid inquvies durmg tnd p�ase, to mdude prowdmg wntten clanficat�on as may be requued
p, Prepare and d�stnbute any bid addenda as requsr�,
Da�meMs to be futmshed by 1hB Consulfani
• Electron�c f�e of ail finai plans {AutoCAD and PDF files) and �eafica�ons (MS Word/PDF #iles) mcluding addenda (as
may be applicabte)
• Hard copy of pians, spe�rficatwns, and c�ost esUmates to u�clude any addenda (as may be appUcable).
o Two sets (paper copies) oE plans (34° x 22" �uik s�ze and 11" x tT half s�zej, speaf�cat�ans, and cost estenates at each
of the three subm�ttal mtervals as hsted m the scope of work.
• Co of all photog , e�fibrts, and dra+aings prepared as part of th�s pro eci.
�B form190-036 Page13of24
Revised Oct 20�1
r• Transportatwn Improvement Board (T18)
�tj1. Consultant Agreement
EXHIBtT C-2
Payment
(Cost Plus Faed Fee}
The CONSt1LTA�fT sha� be ��d by the AG4VCY far oompleted waic and sernces rendered under ihis AGREEMEfdf as prowded here�nafter
Such payment sha� be full compensat�on for ail work perfortned or senr�ces rendered and for ali labor, maienais, eqtupment, and �nadentals
necessary to compiete the work spec�ied �n Sect►on U, 'Scope af Work°
A. Actual Costs
Payment for aU cansultu�g services fo� this pro�ect shatl be on ihe basis of the CONSULTANTs actual �st pius a fixed fee The a�uai cost
sfiall �nclude direct salary cast, overhead, and dnect nonsaiary wst
1. Direct Costs
The c�r�ary cost is the d�ect salary pa�d to pnnc�pafs, ��, techmc�l, and clencal persame! for the Ume they are produc�vdY e��9�
in wak necessary to fu1171 the terms of Uus AGREEMENT
Ov�head Costs
Overhead oosts are those aosts oiher than dreet oos� avtuch are mduded as such on the books oi the CONSULTANT m the normal ev�aY
keeping ot �ts books Progress paymenis shall be made at ihe rate �own �n the headmg of this AGREEMENT, undea''Ov�ad P� � f �t
Rate.° Tota1 ovefi�d payment sha11 be based on the method shown +n the headmg af the AGREEMEldT The three opUortis are explamed
a Actual Cost if tMs meihod �s in�cated �n the headmg of the A� t�a�AG�EId AGa � NT� ��en ae��UL�TMR� act
orrerhead costs venhed by audEt, up to mawmum amount payab
cflsts
b Actual Cost Not Ta Exceed Ma�dmum Perc�t If th�s m�hod +s md�cated m the headmg ot ttns AGREEMEM', the AGENCY�� ��
r�mburse the CONSULTANT at the actuad ove►'�ead rate vea�ied bY aucGt uP to the mawmum perc�tage shown in the space p
overh�d paymer� when aocumulated wtlh aV other actua� �s�s shali rrot exc�ed the total maxunum amouM Rayable sho�m m the t�ng o�
this AGREEMENT
c. Faed Rate� If th�s method is mdicated in the hea�'ing of the AGREEh9ENT, the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT for ovefi�d
at the percentage rate shown. Ttus rate shall not chan� dwmg the Gfe of the AGREEMENT
A summary � the OONSUITAN'fs cast �tunate and the overhead eomputa�on a►'e attached her�° as Exh''�ts D and E and bY �S rd�ce made
part of this AQREEMENT When an actuat �st overhead rate or actual aast not to acceed werhead rate �s used, the acivat ovefi�d �ate
deterrruned at the end of each fiscal year st�ll be used fa the compulahfln of pr�gress PaYm�� �unng the iollowing year and for r�ro�a�vety
ad'}usGng ihe prernous year's overhead cast to ref(ect the actual rate.
The CONSULTANT sha11 ad�se the AGENCY as sflon as pos�bte of the adual overhead rate tor ea� liscai Year and of �e ac�al rate ��1 to
ihe date of c�mpletion of the wodc The AGENCY andlor TiB may perform an audd ot the CONSULI'APIT's books and recads at arry bme dunng
regular business haus to detemune ihe actual werhead rale, d ihey so de�re
Direct Nonsalary Cost mdude, but are not
pirect nonsalary costs wdi be reimlwrsed at the adual cost to the CONSULTANT appUcable to th�s concrad These d�arges may
lirruted to the follabnng �t�ns travel, pnrt�ng, long disstance idepl�e, suppGes. oomPuter c�ar9es, and fees oE subc�ruttltards Pur or tram havei wili
aniy be re�mbursed to ec�nomy ciass levefs �udess oth�w�se a� by the AQENCY The txqmg for nonsalary cosi, �irecdY id�ab�e ""th ihe
Pro�ect, shall be an dem2�l BsUng of the d�+arges supported bY o�nal l�ds or le�bie oopies of mvaces� �xp�e AGENCYup� reque�. AA of
supporGng data r�a�ned by the �NSULTANT Cop�es of the ongmal suppo►�nH docume"is shaU be pro�nded
the above charges must be neoessary for sen+►ces to be provrcled und� tlus A41�EMENT
Fixed Fee
The fixed iee. whlch repres�ts the CONSULTAM'`s profit, �s �ou�m m ihe hea�ng of tlus AGREfMENT under Faced Fce. Ttns iee is has� a� ihe
soope of work detir�ed m itus AQREEMEM' and the eshmated marrmonths re�,ared to perfonn the stated scope of +�rk in the event a
supplsmenta! agreemeni �s entered into for addbonal wodc by the CAI�kStATAM'� ihe supplemental a�eement may mdude� �eted b�
costs and appropnate add�twnal fee The fixed fee �n11 be prorated and paid monthly �n proportion to ihe percer�ta9e
CONSULTANT and repoded m the moMhly progress repats aa;omparrym� the �mro�ces
.�.� pp� tgp.ptg Page 14 of 24
Rrsrns6d OCt 2C01
� Transportation Improvement Board (TIB)
�' Consultant Agreement
Any pahon of 1he fixed fee eamed by not prevwusiy pa�d m the �ogr�s f�Yments w�l be cover m the finai payment, sub�ect to the pransans ot
Sect�on !X, Temu►�Uon ot Agreernent
5 Maxanum Totai Amour� Payable
The mauamum t�al arna.mt payabie, by the AGEtdCY to the CONSULTANT under itnns AGREEMENff, shall not exceed tl�e am°unt shown'n ihe
hea�ng of th�s AGREEMF.HT as maxmwm amamt payabte, mdud� indudes tl�e Fxed Fee� ur�less a suppteme�tai agreement has been ne�trated
and execxated by the AGENCY pna to a�a,rrmg any oosts m exoess ot tl�e mawn►wn a� t�'Y���
B. Mor�thty Progress Payments
The CANSULTA(VT may submit imro�ces to the AGENCY for reimtwrsement of a�al casts pl�s the �u�ated °�fi� �d fee n� more aft� than
oncs per mor�h during the progress of the wor4c. Such �nvou:es shall be m a�m�at approved by the AGENCY and aoc�rn�n�ed by the monthiY P��
fa each item mdudmg direct sal cGred nonsalary and ailowable ov� cos#s io whrc� ra'll be t�he�prorat � Fee 9 and suppod documeni
C. Final Payment
Final Paymer+t a� arry balance due the CANSULTANT oi the gross amouM eamed wal be made promptlY �Pon �ts v�'f'cah°n by the AGENCY after the
oomptetion ot the work under th�s AGREEMENfT, contingent upori receipl of alt PS&E, Pl�ns, m�s� notes. repo�, and other related documents which are
requ�red to be fum�shed under tMs AGREEMENT Aaceptance of such rinai PaYm�1 b�'the COWSULTAM' shall consfitute a release of all daims of ar�r
nature wlnch the C�NSULTAM may have agamst the AGENCY unless such da+rt� are speafrcaliy reserved �n wnting a►� tr�m'aed to the AGENCY by
the CaNSULTANT pnor b tls aco�tance. Sa�d final payme,nt shaB not, howeva'� be a bar to anY da�"�s tha� ihe AGENCY may hava aga�nst the
CONSULTAM' or to arry remedies ihe AGEIVCY may pursue w�h �ect to such dam�s that the AGENCY may have agamst the C4NSULTANT or to
any r�ned� the AGENCY may pursue with respect to such cl�ms.
D. Inspec�on af Cost Records
The CONSULTANI' and his subcmnsullaMs shall keep avalat�e for inspecbon by r�resentaUvss of the AGENCY andlar TIB, for a penod af tnree years
after finat payment, the c�st recflrds and ac�unts peda�rung to th� AGREENIENT 8 any �ibgaUOn, claim, or audit ansmq out of, m connecha► with, or
related to tlus oordrad �s mitiated before the exp�raUon ot the thre.e�year penod, the oost records and a000unts �ali be r�a�ned unt� such t�tigation, d�m,
or audtt u�vaNnng ihe rec�rds �s oompleted
-nB Form 190-018 Page 15 oi 24
r�6vt�d OCt 2v"0 �
.r"ma Transportation ImprovemeM Board (118)
�� Consultant Ag�eement
EXHIBIT D-i
Consultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet
(Lump Sum, Cost Pius Fixed Fee, Cost per Unit of Work}
Prepared lry Date
Bnan Sourwme, P E June 17, 2013
Pro�ect
Lower Wheaton Way {Manette Bndge to Lebo Boulevartq — Schedule A. Roadway Design
Direct Salary Cost (DSC)
Ciassi�ica�on Man Hours Rate
Pr�ncipaNn-Charge 24 x $32 to $58
Profect Manager/Engmeer 180 x $32 to $55
E i TJQesigNCnnl Engmeers 290 x $18 to $36
Trans�rtai�oNElecUical 6x,pneer 48 x $24 to $50
AutoCAD Techrnc�aNDrafter 130 x $15 �o $31
Envffonmental TechrncianlSpe,cial�st 24 x $26 to $36
Profess�onai Land Swveyor 0 x $33 to $42
Survey (Xew d x $43 to $96
Rescdent Inspector 0 x $28 to $46
TOTAL DSC
OdERHEAD (OH Cost inctuding SaNary Additives)
Cost
$ 1,344
$ 7,92fl
$ 9,8�
$ 1,924
$ 3,77Q
$ 768
$ 0
$ 0
$ 0
$25,582
� OH Rate x DSC ar 180� x$25,582 � $�,�
F{XED FEE (FF)
FF Rate x DSC or 4290 x$25,582
REIMBURSABLES
Mix. Expenses, inciudmg mil�ge, Reproduct�on, etc.
SUBCONSULTANT COST (See Exhibit G) (includtng 10°k Administrative Overhead)
TOTAL (SCHEDULE A)
TIB F°""190-016
Revised Oct 200i
s�a7�a
$ 775
$11,941
595,090
Page 16 of 24
r,,,��• Transp�rtatwn Improvemeni Board (TIB)
t�'. Consultant Agreement
Prepared by �
�� ��, P � June 17. 2013
Pro�e�t
Lower Wheaton Way (Mar�ette Bndge ro Lebo Boulevarc� - Schedule B. Storm Drainage Outfall
Direct Satary Cost (DSC}
Class�ation Man Hou�s Rate
pr�apaWn-Charge 16 x $32 to $58 =
Project ManagerlEn�neer 70 x $3'L ro$55 =
E.1.UDes�gNCmi Engmeers i60 x $18 to $36 =
TransporhafiorVElecincal Eng�neer 0 x $24 to $50 =
AutoCAD TechnraaNDraiter 84 x $15 to $31 =
Env�ronmenfi�l Ter�ir►ic�anlSp�al�st 80 x $26 to $36 =
Professia�al Land Surveya 4 x $33 to $42 =
Survey Crew 0 x $43 to $96 =
ResrcieM inspector 0 x $28 to $46 -
TOTAL DSC
QVERHEAD (OH Cost including Salary Additirrea)
OH Rate x DSC or 184� x$14,296
�. l�]
f F Rate x DSC or 42% x$14,296
REIMBURSABLES
Misc. Expenses, including mdeage, Reproduction, etc.
SUBCONSULTAWT COST (See Exhibit G) (inaiuding 10°b Admt�strative Or►eri►eac�
TOTAL (SCHfDU1.E$)
�e Fa�m 190-016
Rsv�sed Oci 2801
Cost
�—
$ 896
$ 3,080
$ 5,440
� 0
$ 2,320
$ 2,`a60
$ 4
$ 0
$ d
$14,296
$25,733
S��
$ 282
$ 6,838
$53,153
Page 17 ot 24
� Transportation Improvement Buard (Tt8)
t�'' Consultant Agreement
oate
Prepared by
��� P E Jurre 17, 2013
�1�
Lower Wheaton Way (Manette 8ndge #o Lebo Baufavard) - Schedule C Schley Canyon Cu�rert RepaidReplacement
oi,� s��y co� �osc�
Classifica�on Man Hours ��
Prncq�m-Charge 2 x $32 to $58 =
Project R�anager/En�neer 18 x $32 to $55 =
EI.TJDesigMCivd Engmeers 36 x $18 b$36 =
TransporNafion/Electncai Engfieer 0 x $24 to $50 = -
AutoCAD TechnicianlDrafter 28 x $15 to $31 =
En�nronmen#ai TechrnqanlSpec�af�t 0 x $26 to $36 =
Professional Land Surveyor 0 x $33 to $42 -
Sunrey Crew 20 x $43 to $96 =
Res�dent Inspector 0 x $'18 to $46 =
TOTAL OSC
OVERHEAD (OH Cost inciuding Salary Addifives)
8H Rate x DSC ar 180% x$4,620
FlXED FEE (FFj
F� Rate x DSC or 42% x$4,620
REl�BURSABLES
I�isa Expens�.a, lnciuding mile�age, Repraducaon� etc.
SUBCONSULTANT COST {See Exh�it G) (ficladmg 14% Administrative Ovefiead)
'i'OTAL (SCt�IEDULE C)
-�B Porm 190-016
R6vi;ed Cct 2001
c�
$ 112
$ 792
$ 1,224
$ 0
� stz
$ 0
$ 0
$ 1,680
$ 0
$ 4,620
$ 8,316
$ ��
$ 271
$ 2.840
$17,987
Page 18 ot 24
s TranspoRatwn Improvement Board (T18)
��� Consu{tant Agreement
Prepared by Date
Ba►ry Baker. P E Juy 31. 2013
�
Lower Wheaton Way (Manette Bndge to Lebo Boulevard} - Schedule D San�tary Sewer Rehab�fitatwn
Direct Satary Cost (DSC}
Classifica�on Man Hours �
Princ�paWn-Charge 2 x $32 to $58 =
Pro�ect MaraagerlEngmeer S x $32 to $55 =
EI TJDesigniCivil En�neers 24 x $18 to $36 =
TransportatioNElec��cai Engineer 0 x $24 to $50 -
AutoCAD Tedtn►ciaNDrafter 24 x $15 to $31 -
Env�onmental Techrnc�aNSp�iafist 4 x $28 to $36 =
Professwnal Land Suroeyor 0 x $33 to $42 =
Survey Crew 0 x $43 to $96 =
Resxient Inspector 0 x $28 to $46 =
TOTAL OSC
OVERHEAD (ON Cost including Sa1ary Addi�vesj
OH Rate x DS� or i 80�o x$1,976
�xEO � �FFl
FF Rate x DSC or 42°k x$i,976
REJMBURSABLES
Mi�. Expe��s, inctuding mileage, Reproduction, etc.
SUBCONSULTANT COST (S� Exhibit G) (including 10°h Administrative Overhead)
TOTAL (SCHfDULE Dj
ng Farm 190-418
FieViSv�d OCi 2W S
Cost
$ 112
$ 352
$ s�s
$ 0
$ 696
$ 0
$ 0
$ 0
$ 0
$1,976
��
g s�a
$ 152
$ a
$6,515
Page t9 0124
a. Transportat�on Improvement Board (TIB)
�? Consuitant Agreement
��
Prepared by
&ran Saurovme, P.E July 31. 2013
Pro�ect
Lower 1Nheaton Way (Manette Bndge to Lebo Boulevard} — Schedute E. Wate� System Improvements
Direct Salary Cost (DSC}
Ctassiflca�on Man Hours Rate
pnncq�a�.m.Charge 2 x $32 #o $58 -
Pro}ect Manage�lEngineer 16 x $32 to $55 =
EI.T.lDes�gnlCml Engmeers 56 x $18 to $36 =
AutoCAD Tec�rnaanlDrafter 4U x $15 to $31 =
Environmenhdl Technx,yanfSpec�alwst 0 x $26 to $36 =
Profess►onal Land Surveyot 2 x $33 to $42 -
S�nvey Ctew 10 x $43 to $96 =
Res�dent Inspe.ctor 0 x $28 ta $46 =
TOTAL DSC
OVERHEAD (OH Cost inclu�ng Salary Addi�vesj
OH Rate x OSC or i80°k x$4,514
RXED FEE (FF)
FF Rate x DSC or 42% x$4,514
REiMBURSABLES
Misc. Expenses, including mileage, R�roducbon, etc.
SUBCONSULTANI' COST (See Fxhibtt G) (inciuding 10°k Adminisbafive Overheadj
TOTAL(SCHEDULE �
70TAL Ai1990UM' SC}tEDULE A{$95,090), SCHEDULE B($53,153) Ai�1D SCHEQULE C($17,987),
SCHEDULE D($6,515�, AND SCHEDULE f(14,735�
n$ Form t90-016
r�ev�ci OCt 2�i
cost
$ 112
$ 704
$ 1,904
$ 1,160
__
$ o
$ �
$ 550
$ 4
$ 4,514
$ 8,125
$ 1,896
$ 20Q
$ 0
$14�735
$187,484
Page 20 of 24
��',..`- Transportatron ImprovemeM Board (Ti8)
E� Consultant Agreement
EXHIBIT D-2
Consultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet
(Spec�c Rates of Pay)
FEE SCHEDULE
D�scipline or Job TiUe Hourly Rate Overh�d Profit per Hour
TechnicianlDrafter $14-$36 $25.24-$64,80 $5.7aS14.65 $44.90-�115.45
E.1.T.IDesigniCivii Engineers (Eng. !, II and Ill) $24-$35 $43.20-�63.00 $9J7-$14.25 576.97•$11225
Environme�rtal T�hnician(Specialist $25$40 $45.00�$7200 $14.18-$16.28 $80•18
StructuraUElectricat Engmeers �31-$53 $55.80$95.40 $1Z.62-$21.57 $99.42-$169.97
Pro{ect Manager/Engineer (Eng. IV, V and V� $33�56 �59.40-$100.80 $13.43-$22.79 $105.83-5179.58
Principal-�n-Charge/Proj�t Managers $35�59 $63.00-$101.20 $1425-324.01 $i12.25-$189.21
Survey Crew $45-$85 �85.00�$153.00 $18.32-534.60 $144.32-$2T2fi0
Professional Land Surveyor �34$38 $61.20-�68.40 $13.84515.47 �109•Q4$121.87
Fleid InspectodResident Engineer $23-$48 $41.90-$86.40 $9.36-$9•54 $73•76-�153.94
Secretary/Typisti` NIA WA NIA NIA
' Seaetanat and clerkal tees are nct b�qed, but are included in Ihe overhe� mult�l�er Gsted The same �s uue for accountmg, bookkeeping, m•house pnnung up ro m�au.
word process�ng, computer use, �mputer aided drafting, and telephone and fax c�is.
�g Form 190-Ot6 Page 21 of 24
Abv�sbtt Oct 2�i,S
r�. TranspoRaUon Improvement Board (TIB)
E�, Consultant Agreemen#
EXHIBIT E-1
Breakdown of Overhead Cost
GRAY & OSBORNE
COMPUTATION OF OVERHEAD MULTIPLIER
Federal, State, and Local Taxes ... .... ...................................................................... .....25.47%
Insurance and Medical... ..... ....................................... .......... ......... ............. .. ..26.58%
Professional Development and Educat�on .............. ......... .... .............. ......................... ..4.56°/a
Vacations and Holidays .. . . .......... ... ...................................... . ..... . .... ..15.14%
..... . . ..
AdmEn�shation (TYpin9, CADD, G1S, Computer) ..... .......... ................. .... .......... ..... ..54.21%
Rent, Ubl�ies, and Depreciabon ...... . . ......... .............. ... ...............................................
0#�ce Expenses ............ ......... .. . .. .................................................... .... ............. .....8.12%
Recruiting ..................................................................... ................ ............................0.12%
Professional Serv�ces ................ . ........ .. .. ................................................................. . i 22%
Incentnre and Retirement ............ .............................................. ...... ....... .. .....26.60°/a
Facdities Cost af Cap�tal ...... ........... ........... .. ...... ........ . ..... . ........................................0
TOTAL .............................................................................................................
PROFESSIONAL ENGiNEERIPfG SERViCES CONTRACT
ENGiNEER'S REPRESENTATIVE PAYROLL RATES
THROUGH JUNE 15, 2013*
Emplovee Ctassification
AutoCAD/GIS Technician/Engmeer�ng Intern
AutoCAD/GIS Manager/Graphic Artist
Sen�or Electncal Engineer
Senior Structural Eng�neer
Elec�ical Engineer
Structural Engineer
Environmental Techn�cianlSpec�al�st
Engineers ! and I1
Eng�neer III
Engmeer IV
Eng�neers V and VI
Pr�ncipal-in-Charge/Pro�ect Manager
Resident Engmeer
Field Inspector
F�eld Survey Crew (2 Person)*'
Field Survey Crevu (3 Person)*'`
Professional Land Surveyor
SecretaryMford Processor"
$14.00
$29.00
$44.00
$36 00
$a2.ao
$31 AQ
$25.40
$24.00
$29.40
$33 00
$35.00
$38 00
$23.00
$45.00
$68A0
$34.00
NlA
Payroll Rates
to $27.00
to $36A0
to $53.00
to $49.00
to $43.40
to $40.00
to $44.00
to $33.40
to $35.00
to $41.00
to $56 QO
to $59.00
to $48.40
to $37.00
to $60.00
to $85 04
to $38.00
Updated annually, together wdh the ovefiead
All actual out�of-podcet sxp�ses incurred drcedly oo fhe pro�ect are a�ed to ihe bd6ng The bi8ing �s based on direct out-at�podcet expenses, meals, �od9�9•
laboratory te�g and trar�sportation The tran�ortabon rate is $0 55 per rmle or lhe current �amum IRS rate �nihout reoe�t IAS S� 162{a)
" Admm�s7atan expenses,ndude �creta�ial and cler�cal work, GIS, CADD, and canputer equ�pmen� owned swvey eq�+�proent and mols (stakes, Aubs, lath.
etc - Nate rtnleage b�led sQparatefy at rate notec�, misc811aneous adrtanistra0on tasks. facs�m�es, te�p►rone. a� �m6ng �sts, wh�ch are iess than $150
n$ Fwm 190-016 Paga 22 of 24
Revlsed Ott 200i
� 7ransportatron improvement 8oard (TIB)
t�� Consultant Agreement
EXHIBIT F-1
Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
by the Agency Other than for Fault of the Consuitant
{Re#er to Agreement, Section I�
Lump Sum Cor�h�cts
A�inal payment shali be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payme�ts prev�ously made
shaii totaf the same percentage of the Lump Sum Amour� as the wak compieted at the fime af terminahon is
to the total work required for the PROJECT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shail be pa�d for any authonzed
exba wark c�mpleted
Cast Pius Fixed Fee Contracts
A final payment shail be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made,
shall tatai the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as tl�e work compieted at the t�me of
terminabon �s to the tatal work required for the PROJECT. In add�Uon, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any
authorized ex�aa work campieted.
Spec'�'ic Rates of Pay Contracts
A finai payment shail be made to the CONSULTAM' fa actual hours charged at the fime of term�nation of this
AGREEMENT pius and dir�t nansalary c4sts incurred at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT
Cost Per Unit of Work Contwacts
A finai payment shall be made to the CO(VSULTAMI' for actua{ units of work compfeted at the time of
termma6on of this AGREEMENT
�B Form 150-018 Page 23 of 24
Re�iised Oct 2031
� Transportation tmprovement Board {TIB)
�,E?�� Consultant Agreement
EXHiB1T G-1
Subcontracted Work
The AGENCY perm�ts subcontracts for the following por�ons of the work of th�s AGREEMENT•
PanGEO, Inc. (Geotechrncal Sennces) $10,855 (Schedule A)
$ 6,216 (Schedule By
Mendian Environmentai, Inc. (Fsh Suroey} $ 2,581(Schedule C)
Note. Amount sflown above does not include 10 percer� Administrabve Overhead as shown in Exh�bii D-1.
�B Form 190-018 Page 24 of 24
Rev�sed Oct 200�