HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/23/2019 STUDY SESSION PACKET______________________________________________________________
CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 100, Bremerton, WA 98337 Phone (360) 473-5280
* * * A M E N D E D * * *
OCTOBER 23, 2019
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
5:00 PM in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603
The Study Session is open to the public, but there will be no opportunities for input or participation; no
action is anticipated; and the content of these items is subject to change. If approved by Council, the
items will be placed on the November 6, 2019 Council Meeting Agenda:
A. BRIEFINGS ON AGENDA ITEMS
1. Professional Services Agreement with LaCross and Murphy, PLLC for Public Defense
Services
2. Interagency Agreement between the Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts
and Bremerton Municipal Court for Interpreter Grant Funds
3. Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) 2019-2021 Biennial Stormwater Capacity
Grant
4. Purchase of 12.5% Bulk Sodium Hypochlorite Solution from HASA, Inc. for the Westside
Wastewater Treatment Plant
5. Grant of Easement to Puget Sound Energy, Inc. (PSE) for Power System Improvement along
Belfair Valley Road
6. Ordinance amending Chapter 2.78 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Real Property
Transactions"
7. Ordinance amending Chapter 2.92 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Insurance
Coverage and Claims Management"
8. Proposed Public Hearing approving Substantial Amendment to the 2018 CDBG/HOME
Action Plan
9. Proposed Public Hearing on a Resolution approving the 2020 Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Funding Recommendations for inclusion in the 2020
CDBG/HOME Action Plan
10. Proposed Public Hearing on Revenue Sources for the Proposed FY-2020 City of Bremerton
Budget
11. Ordinance amending and re-establishing City Rates & Fees for 2020
12. Ordinance amending Section 15.06.015 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
“Assessments, Rates, Fees and Charges – Established” (General Facility Charges)
13. Ordinance amending and re-establishing Utility Assessments, Rates, Fees, and Charges for
2020
14. Update on Qualifying Local Tax in support of SHB 1406 - Financial Services Director Mike
Riley Information only...
15. Discussion on Rental Housing Safety Program – President Eric Younger Information only...
B. GENERAL COUNCIL BUSINESS
o Public Works Committee Briefing (10/15/19 Meeting) – Council Member Richard Huddy
o Audit Committee Briefing (10/22/19 Meeting) – Chair Leslie Daugs
o Other General Council Business
Continued on back…
C. EXECUTIVE SESSION
15-Minutes to discuss "Potential Litigation" allowed under RCW 42.30.110 (1)(i) Item pulled...
D. ADJOURNMENT OF STUDY SESSION
Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations
should contact the City Clerk’s Office at (360) 473-5323 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Professional Services Agreement for Public
Defense Services with LaCross and Murphy,
PLLC
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: Finance
Presenter: Melinda Monroe
Phone: (360) 473-5306
SUMMARY: On July 10th, 2019 the City of Bremerton issued a RFP for public defense services.
LaCross and Murphy, PLLC, the current public defense services provider, is recommended to be
awarded the agreement. Their proposal provides for a decreased fixed cost with a savings of
$25,000 annually, and a year-end reconciling of assigned cases, and payment adjustment as
applicable, to insure compliance with State standards for caseloads for these services.
ATTACHMENTS: Professional Services Agreement and Exhibit A: Washington State Supreme
Court Indigent defense standards dated June 15, 2012.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): $250,000 annually ($20,833.34 monthly) is
included in the current budget. A year-end reconciling of cases could result in a year-end budget
adjustment.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ Limited Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with LaCross and Murphy, PLLC for Public
Defense Services; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially
the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A1
1
Public Defense Services
AGREEMENT FOR CITY OF BREMERTON
PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES
LaCross & Murphy, PLLC
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Bremerton (“the
City”), a Washington municipal corporation and LaCross & Murphy, PLLC, a Professional
Limited Liability Corporation (“Public Defender”), whose address is 559 Bay Street Port
Orchard, Washington 98366.
WHEREAS, the City has solicited legal services via the Public Defense
Services Request for Proposal which closed on August 12, 2019, and LaCross &
Murphy, PLLC is the awarded responder to this proposal, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to have legal services, as described in the
August 12th, 2019 Request for proposal and this Agreement, performed for indigent
persons legally entitled to appointed representation in the City of Bremerton, by
Public Defender as an independent contractor, and
WHEREAS, the City and the Public Defender agree that any and all funds
provided pursuant to this Agreement are provided for the sole purpose of provision of
legal services to indigent persons prosecuted with crimes in Bremerton Municipal
Court,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, the
promises and covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the
parties agree as follows
SECTION 1: DEFINITIONS
A.Case Assignment: A case assignment is that particular case assigned by the Bremerton
Municipal Court.
B.Case Credit: Case credit is a non-weighted case assignment.
C.City: City is the City of Bremerton.
D.Client: An indigent person who has been assigned to the Public Defender by the
Bremerton Municipal Court.
E.Completed Case: A completed case involves all necessary legal action from arraignment
through the end of jurisdiction. This includes the filing of a notice of appeal upon the client’s
request, application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and a motion for appointment of
appellate counsel but does not include the actual representation on appeal.
F.Contract Administrator: Contract Administrator is the City of Bremerton Municipal
Court Administration.
G.Court: Court is the Municipal Court of Bremerton.
2
Public Defense Services
H. Criminal Case: A case is any one charge or series of related charges under one case
number filed against one defendant/respondent.
I. Criminal Case Disposition: The case assignment remains in effect to the end of
jurisdiction of the case and shall include the filing of an appeal, if applicable.
J. Discovery: Discovery consists of those reports, letters, memorandums, after-action
reports, incidents reports, witness statements, officers' statements, expert witness reports which
the City Prosecutor is obligated to provide on a continuing basis under the City or State code and
pursuant to the State and Federal Constitutional requirements.
K. Legal Service: Legal service is legal representation provided by a licensed attorney and
associated paraprofessional staff to an individual client, pursuant to a case assignment or court
appointment. The attorney will be required by the Public Defender to satisfy the Code of
Professional Responsibility, the law of the State of Washington and the United States in the full
discharge of the duties to each individual client under this Agreement.
L. Indigent Defendant: An indigent defendant is a person determined indigent by the Court,
as being eligible for a court-appointed attorney, pursuant to RCW 10.101.
M. Mayor: Mayor is the Mayor of Bremerton or designee.
N. Misdemeanor Practice Area:
1. Misdemeanor Case: Any criminal case filed by the Bremerton City Attorney or
designee in Bremerton Municipal Court whether a misdemeanor or a gross misdemeanor.
2. Misdemeanor Appeal: A misdemeanor appeal involves filing the notice of
appeal, if necessary, perfecting the record following the filing of the notice of appeal, preparation
of the transcript pursuant to Rule 6.3a RALJ, preparing such briefs and memoranda as are
required, arguing the case in Superior Court, and handling such paperwork as the Superior
Court's decision and orders direct.
3. Misdemeanor Writ: A writ involves filing notice, perfecting the record, preparing
such briefs and memoranda as required, arguing the case in Superior Court and handling such
paperwork as the Superior Court's decision and orders direct.
O. Paraprofessional Staff: Investigators, social workers and paralegals.
P. Public Defender: The Public Defender is LaCross & Murphy, PLLC.
Q. Court Time: Time accounted for being the “attorney of the day” for arraignments and in
custody matters that have not been assigned to the Public Defender.
3
Public Defense Services
SECTION 2: PUBLIC DEFENSE STANDARDS
The City adopts the following standards for the delivery of Public Defense Services, pursuant to
RCW 10.101.030:
A. Compensation of Counsel: Compensation of counsel shall be in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections 4 and 6 of this agreement.
B. Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel: The duties and responsibilities of counsel shall be
in accordance with this agreement.
C. Caseload Limits: Public Defender will accept all caseloads for Bremerton misdemeanor
cases, except cases in which there is a conflict of interest, and following six to eight months after
the beginning of the term of this Agreement, shall review the case assignments with the City to
evaluate and establish caseload limits, whether on a weighted basis or not, to meet the new case
limit requirements set forth in Exhibit A. Case assignments are anticipated to exceed 800 non-
weighted cases per year.
D. Responsibility for Expert Witness and Investigator Fees: After approval by the Court,
expert witness and investigator fees will be paid by the City.
E. Attorneys and Staff: The Public Defender shall provide, at a minimum, two full-time
attorneys and one full-time paraprofessional staff person to provide services pursuant to this
Agreement.
F. Supervision: The Public Defender shall provide supervising attorneys at the following
standards: one supervisor for every two attorneys. Supervisors shall ensure all new associates
have been properly trained and are prepared to appear at the Bremerton Municipal Court and
shall appear in court to assist in training of new associates as necessary.
G. New Standards: The Public Defender shall comply with the new standards for Indigent
Defense adopted by the Washington State Supreme Court by order dated June 15, 2012, attached
hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 3: TERM
This Agreement shall commence on the first (1st) day of November 2019 and terminate the
thirty-first (31th) day of December 2021 unless extended or terminated earlier pursuant to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
SECTION 4: SCOPE OF WORK
A. Purpose: The purpose of this agreement is to provide legal services through effective
assistance of counsel to indigent persons. Legal services shall be statutorily and constitutionally
based.
B. Professional Conduct:
4
Public Defense Services
1. The Public Defender shall provide the services of attorneys and staff members in
compliance with all of the applicable laws and administrative regulations of the State of
Washington, the United States, Bremerton Municipal Code, and the Washington State Rules for
Professional Conduct (RPC).
2. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to impair or inhibit the exercise of
independent, professional judgment by an attorney employed by the Public Defender with
respect to any client wherein an attorney-client relationship has been established pursuant to the
terms of this Agreement.
3. Nothing in this Agreement shall require or permit, without the consent of the
client, access to or disclosure of any confidential communication made by a client to any
attorney employed by the Public Defender or any such confidential communications made to
agents or employees of the Public Defender for such attorney; the advice given by an attorney to
a client; or any other statements and materials privileged from disclosure in a court of law.
4. Attorneys and staff employed by the Public Defender shall not solicit or accept
any compensation, gifts, gratuities or services from any client.
C. Eligible Population: The population served shall be indigent persons legally entitled to
appointed legal services in Bremerton Municipal Court, as assigned by the Court.
D. Case Assignment: The Public Defender shall accept all case assignments, except for
cases in which there is a conflict of interest or other related issue that would prevent the Public
Defender from accepting assignment of the case.
E. Conflicts: The Public Defender reserves the right to decline to advise or represent any
client on the basis of actual legal, ethical, or professional conflict of interest. The Public
Defender shall be responsible for checking for conflicts and identifying if a conflict exists. The
Public Defender shall have a written policy which explains how they define conflict cases. This
policy must be approved by the Contract Administrator. The Public Defender shall perform a
conflicts check before any substantial work is done on the case.
F. Duties and Responsibilities of the Public Defender: In order to perform its
responsibilities under the Agreement, the Public Defender shall have the power and duty to:
1. Hire all Public Defender personnel;
2. Provide fiscal management; establish compensation of personnel; maintain
payroll records and provide payments for all personnel including withholding of income taxes,
payment of social security taxes, payment of worker compensation and industrial insurance taxes
(where applicable), and fringe benefits;
3. Supervise and maintain the quality of staff and services received or performed,
and provide internal evaluation sessions as necessary;
4. Suspend, remove, or terminate personnel not adequately performing the duties
and responsibilities assigned, engaging in or condoning misconduct, or whose conduct or
continued performance of duties is detrimental to the Public Defender program;
5
Public Defense Services
5. Accept and represent all cases and clients officially referred by the Court unless
withdrawal from such representation is allowed in accordance with provisions as stated above;
6. In the event that this Agreement is terminated or not renewed, the Public
Defender shall continue to provide services pursuant to this Agreement for three (3) months after
the termination date. Public Defender shall not be assigned any new cases, however, Public
Defender shall attempt to complete the representation of all clients who have been referred by
the Court during the period in which the Agreement is in effect for the compensation received or
receivable under the terms of the Agreement, provided that completed representation is not made
impossible by a client’s failure to appear.
7. Provide after-hours staffing sufficient to take after-hours phone calls.
G. Duties and Responsibilities of Public Defender Attorneys: In order to perform their
duties under this Agreement, staff attorneys of the Public Defender shall:
1. Counsel and represent in all ensuing criminal proceedings before appeal those
clients who are officially referred by the Court. Such services include but are not limited to:
preparation for and representation of the client at the pretrial hearings, trial and at sentencing
hearings or any other related proceedings.
2. Appear at all in-custody and arraignment calendars.
3. Counsel clients with regard to their rights to appellate review and file any
necessary notice for appellate review when requested by a client.
SECTION 5: PERFORMANCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
A. Practice Standards and Records
1. The Public Defender shall ensure that all attorneys, paraprofessional staff and
supervisors shall maintain contemporaneous records of all legal services provided on a specific
case. The records shall provide a factual description of the work done and shall be sufficiently
detailed to allow monitoring of legal service activity by the Contract Administrator, subject to
any ethical obligations of the Public Defender.
2. Upon closing a case, all attorney, paraprofessional and supervisor files associated
with the case shall be cross referenced and accessible as a whole for monitoring by the Contract
Administrator, subject to any ethical obligations of the Public Defender.
3. The Public Defender shall establish practice standards to address the following
substantive areas of Agreement compliance. The practice standards shall set objective
expectations for each position and shall be measurable by objective means. With each practice
standard, the Public Defender shall include a procedure for monitoring compliance with the
standard. Written practice standards are due to the Contract Administrator annually. Practice
standards should address the following areas:
a. Attorney practice, including but not limited to;
6
Public Defense Services
i. Lawyer-client relationship, initial case actions, investigation and
preparation, preliminary hearings; disposition without trial; trial;
post-conviction or fact finding and any other areas of attorney
practice deemed appropriate by Public Defender.
ii. Attorney use of paraprofessionals and expert service.
b. Paraprofessional practice.
c. Supervision of attorneys and paraprofessionals.
4. The Public Defender agrees that, within available resources, reasonable efforts
will be made by the Public Defender to keep the initial attorney assigned to a client throughout
any case in which representation is undertaken. The Public Defender is not prohibited from
rotating attorneys or from assigning a single attorney to handle various aspects of legal
proceedings for all indigent persons where such method of assignment is the most reasonable
method of obtaining effective legal representation for indigent persons.
5. A member of the Public Defender staff shall visit any assigned in-custody
criminal defendant and obtain basic contact and other fundamental intake information for a bond
hearing within one (1) working day from notification to the Public Defender of the assignment of
the case and the in-custody status of the client. This provision applies to clients in custody at any
facility within Kitsap County.
6. The Public Defender attorneys shall attempt to make contact with all assigned
clients within five (5) working days from a case assignment or no later than the day prior to the
first pretrial hearing whichever comes first.
7. The Bremerton City Attorney’s Office or designee is responsible for making a
copy of discovery available to the Public Defender. The Public Defender shall request discovery
as soon as possible after case assignment but no later than three (3) business days of the
assignment, whether initial or subsequent, on any case. The Public Defender shall obtain a copy
of discovery at arraignment if available. The Public Defender agrees that discovery may be
provided in electronic format.
8. Discovery shall be reviewed within five (5) days after receipt for purposes of
determining any conflicts of interest. The Public Defender shall notify the Contract
Administrator immediately of any conflict of interest as defined by the Washington State Rules
of Professional Conduct. The Public Defender shall provide the Contract Administrator with a
written explanation stating the basis for the conflict in its notification, in addition to the required
oral or written request to withdraw presented to the court.
9. The Public Defender shall establish and enforce policies and procedures to ensure
that attorney time and other Defender resources funded by this Agreement shall only be used for
work which is authorized by this Agreement.
10. The Public Defender shall ensure that a preliminary written response to any
written complaints concerning services provided by the employees of the Defender or the
Defender itself shall be submitted to the Contract Administrator within three (3) working days of
the date the complaint is received by the Public Defender. Written complaints include e-mail
communications from the Contract Administrator. The Contract Administrator shall copy the
supervising attorney on any complaints sent to the Public Defender.
7
Public Defense Services
11. The Public Defender shall establish policies and procedures for pro-bono work
provided by staff of the Public Defender. These policies and procedures shall assure that any
such pro bono work is not provided to the exclusion or detriment of legal services that are the
subject of this Agreement.
12. The Public Defender or his attorneys shall not provide transportation to any client
assigned to the public defender pursuant to this Agreement.
B. Minimum Attorney Qualifications:
1. Every attorney providing indigent defense services must be a licensed member of
the Washington State Bar and be a member in good standing of the Bar.
2. Every Public Defender attorney shall satisfy the minimum requirements for
practicing law in Washington as determined by the Washington Supreme Court; seven (7) hours
of each year's required continuing legal education credits shall be in courses relating to criminal
law practice or other areas of law in which the Public Defender provides legal services to clients
under the terms of this Agreement or as otherwise required by the Washington State Office of
Public Defense. The Public Defender will maintain for inspection on its premises records of
compliance with this provision.
3. The Public Defender may employ interns pursuant to Admission to Practice Rule
(APR) 9. No more than 5% of the cases handled by the Public Defender may be assigned to Rule
9 interns. However, Rule 9 interns may not be used to supplant the services of an attorney
assigned by the Public Defender to perform the services of this Agreement.
4. The Public Defender attorneys who supervise the misdemeanor attorneys must
have at least three years of criminal defense experience in superior, district or municipal courts in
Washington State.
5. Unless prior written approval has been granted by the Contract Administrator, no
attorney may provide services under this Agreement if that attorney has been removed from
representation in a case for failure to perform basic services necessary to the case or to the client,
or in any manner has been found to be ineffective on appeal by either an ethics panel or by an
appellate court.
C. Evaluations:
The Public Defender Supervisor, or his/her designee, shall evaluate the professional performance
of Public Defender attorneys and paraprofessional staff annually. Attorney evaluations should
include monitoring of time and caseload records, review of case files, quality of case preparation,
as well as in-court observation. Paraprofessional evaluations shall be sufficiently comprehensive
to assess the quality of the actual work performed. The Contractor shall submit to the City a
summary report of the annual attorney performance evaluations. The Contractor shall make
available to the City its evaluation criteria and evidence evaluations were conducted, although all
evaluations are to be confidential between the Contractor's director and the Contractor attorney.
8
Public Defense Services
SECTION 6: PAYMENT
A. The City shall pay the Public Defender for the services as specified in Section 4, Scope of
Work, in the amount not to exceed $250,000.00 annually. Payments will be made in equal
monthly payments.
B. The City will pay the Public Defender by the thirtieth (30) working day of the following
month.
C. In the event of failure to comply with any items and conditions of this Agreement or to
provide in any manner the work or services as agreed to herein, the City reserves the right to
withhold any payment until the City is satisfied that corrective action has been taken or
completed. This option is in addition to and not in lieu of the City’s right to termination as
provided in Section 13 of this Agreement.
D. Adjustment. By October 31st of the Calendar year the Public Defender and the
Contracts Administrator shall review the year to date case assignment numbers (including all
"court time" counts) and create an estimate of year end numbers. If it appears the estimated
annual case load will result in an excess of 1,000 cases (pursuant to Exhibit A and Section 2. E
of this agreement), these cases will be offered to the firm of LaCross and Murphy, PLLC, the
Public Defender. If the Public Defender is able to accept additional caseload, they shall notify
the Contracts Administrator of the estimated number of cases they can accept. If the Public
Defender is unable to accept these cases due to caseload limits, they shall be assigned to another
firm.
1. A final year end count will be made of assigned cases, completed by the Contract
Administrator in January following the year of service.
a. If the final count of assigned cases to the Public Defender is over the
standard case load in Exhibit A and Section 2. E of this agreement, or 1,000 cases, a payment
will be made to the Public Defender in the amount of $250.00 per case over the standard.
b. If the final count of assigned cases to the Public Defender is below the
standard case load in Exhibit A and Section 2. E of this agreement, less than 1,000, a payment
will be made to the City by the Public Defender in the amount of $250.00 per case below the
standard.
SECTION 7: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Case Management System: The Public Defender will use a case management system that will
allow them to file the reports described below.
Reporting: The Public Defender will provide the Contract Administrator monthly reports within
forty-five (45) working days after the close of each calendar month in acceptable format as
follows:
Report Title Due Date
Monthly Court activity reports including
attorney assignments and hearings held
Monthly (45 working days after the close of
each calendar month)
9
Public Defense Services
Year-end reports, Annual Case assignment
review, additional summaries, other reports or
documents as requested by the Contract
Administrator with reasonable notice
Due no later than January 31st following the
year of service.
These reports must contain:
•Defendant’s name
•Case number(s)
•Criminal charges filed
•Disposition of each charge
•Number of court hearings
•Number of appeals filed annually
•Defendant’s jail custody status prior to sentencing
•Bench Trial, Jury Trial, Plea or Dismissal
•Attorney(s) name(s)
•Date case assigned
•Hours spent by attorney
The City of Bremerton, or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any
such books, records and documents for inspection, audit and copying. The report is due on or
before the forty-fifth (45th) working day after the last day of the month of service. Payment may
be withheld if reports are not submitted on time.
The Public Defender will immediately notify the Contract Administrator in writing when it
becomes aware that a complaint lodged with the Bar Association has resulted in reprimand,
suspension, or disbarment of an attorney providing services under this Agreement.
SECTION 8: ADDRESSES FOR NOTICES AND DELIVERABLE MATERIALS
All official notices under this Agreement shall be delivered to the following addresses (or such
other address(es) as either party may designate in writing):
If to City:
City Clerk
City of Bremerton
345 6th Street, Suite 100
Bremerton, WA 98337
(360) 473-5323
If to the Public Defender:
Jacob Murphy
LaCross & Murphy, PLLC
559 Bay Street Port Orchard, WA 98366
10
Public Defense Services
SECTION 9: OTHER EMPLOYMENT
The Public Defender agrees that its legal staff assigned to the Bremerton Municipal Court shall
have as their primary employment representation of indigent clients in Bremerton Municipal
Court. The Public Defender further agrees that it will abide by all provisions of this Agreement
regarding Personal Performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 10: CORRECTIVE ACTION
If the City believes that a breach of this Agreement has occurred, and if the City believes said
breach to warrant corrective action, the following sequential procedure shall apply:
A. The City will notify the Public Defender in writing of the nature of the breach;
B. The Public Defender shall respond in writing within three (3) working days of its receipt
of such notification, which response shall indicate the steps being taken to correct the specified
deficiencies, and the proposed completion date for bringing its performance under this the
Agreement into compliance, which date shall not be more than ten (10) working days from the
date of the Public Defender's response;
C. The City will notify the Public Defender in writing of the City’s determination as to the
sufficiency of the Public Defender's corrective action plan. The determination of the sufficiency
of the Public Defender's corrective action plan will be at the sole discretion of the City; however,
the City’s determination of the sufficiency of the Public Defender's corrective action plan shall
take into consideration the reasonableness of the proposed corrective action, in light of the
alleged breach. In all cases where corrective action is determined by the City to be appropriate,
the City shall work with the Public Defender to implement the plan;
D. In the event that the Public Defender does not respond within the appropriate time with
the corrective action plan, or the Public Defender's corrective action plan is determined by the
City to be insufficient, the City may commence termination of this Agreement in whole or in part
pursuant to Section 11 (B) Termination and Suspension;
E. In addition, the City may withhold any payment owed the Public Defender and/or
prohibit the Public Defender from incurring additional obligations of funds until the City is
satisfied the corrective action has been taken or completed; and
F. Nothing herein shall be deemed to affect or waive any rights the parties may have
pursuant to Section 11 Termination and Suspension.
SECTION 11: TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION
A. Either party may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon one hundred twenty
(120) days prior written notice.
B. The City may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part upon ten (10) days' written
notice to the Public Defender in the event:
11
Public Defense Services
1. The Public Defender substantially breaches any duty, obligation, or service
required pursuant to this Agreement; or
2. The duties, obligations, or services herein become impossible, illegal, or not
feasible, or
3. The City determines that the Public Defender Services are no longer necessary.
Before the City terminates this Agreement pursuant to subsection 11(B), the City shall provide
the Public Defender written notice of termination, which notice shall include the reasons for
termination and the effective date of termination. The Public Defender shall have the
opportunity to submit a written response to the City within (10) working days from the date of
the City’s notice. If the Public Defender elects to submit a written response, the Contract
Administrator will review the response and make a determination within ten (10) days after
receipt of the Public Defender's response.
In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part pursuant to Subsection B (1) of this
Section, the Public Defender shall be liable for damages, including the reasonable costs of the
procurement of similar services from another source unless it is determined by the Contract
Administrator that (i) no default actually occurred, or (ii) the failure to perform was without the
Public Defender's control, fault or negligence.
C. Otherwise, this Agreement shall terminate on the date specified herein, and shall be
subject to extension only by mutual agreement of both parties hereto in writing.
D. Nothing herein shall be deemed to constitute a waiver by either party of any legal right or
remedy for wrongful termination or suspension of the Agreement.
E. In the event of termination, suspension, or non-renewal of this Agreement, all cases not
required to be completed by the Public Defender shall be returned to the Contract Administrator
for reassignment.
SECTION 12: DISPUTES (OTHER THAN SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION)
The Public Defender shall address questions or claims regarding meaning and intent of the
Agreement or arising from this Agreement in writing to the City Clerk, within ten (10) calendar
days of the date in which the Public Defender knows or should know of the question or claim.
The City will ordinarily respond to the Public Defender in writing with a decision, but absent
such written response, the question or claim shall be deemed denied upon the thirtieth day
following receipt by the City.
SECTION 13: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
The Public Defender shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment
because of race, religion, creed, age, color, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity,
political ideology, ancestry, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical
handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification.
12
Public Defense Services
SECTION 14 OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
A. General Requirement: The Public Defender, at no expense to the City, shall comply with
all applicable laws of the United States and the State of Washington; the Charter and ordinances
of The City of Bremerton; and rules, regulations, orders, and directives of their administrative
agencies and the officers thereof. Without limiting the generality of this paragraph, the Public
Defender shall specifically comply with the following requirements of this section.
B. Licenses and Similar Authorizations: The Public Defender, at no expense to the City,
shall secure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement all required
licenses, permits, and similar legal authorizations, and comply with all requirements thereof.
SECTION 15: INDEMNIFICATION
The Public Defender does hereby release and shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City and its
employees and agents harmless from all losses, liabilities, claims (including claims arising under
federal, state or local environmental laws), costs (including attorneys’ fees), actions or damages
of any sort whatsoever arising out of the Public Defender’s performance of the services
contemplated by this Contract to the extent attributable to the acts or omissions, misconduct or
breach of this Agreement by the Public Defender, its servants, agents, and employees. In
furtherance of these obligations, and only with respect to the City, its employees and agents, the
Public Defender waives any immunity it may have or limitation on the amount or type of
damages imposed under any industrial insurance, worker’s compensation, disability, employee
benefit or similar laws. The Public Defender acknowledges that the foregoing waiver of
immunity was mutually negotiated and agrees that the indemnification provided for in this
section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement.
SECTION 16: INSURANCE
A. Insurance certification required. The Public Defender must carry the following
coverages and limits of liability:
(1) Professional Liability (Errors, and Omissions) for attorneys with limits no less
than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence/claim; and
(2) Workers’ Compensation insurance as statutorily required by the Industrial
Insurance Act of the State of Washington, Title 51, Revised Code of Washington and employer's
liability with limits not less than $1,000,000
Any payment of deductible or self-insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the
Public Defender.
All required policies shall be provided on an “occurrence” b asis except professional
liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a “claims-made” basis.
The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance
policies and endorsements. The City further reserves the right to reject any unacceptable policies
and/or endorsements.
13
Public Defense Services
The Public Defender's Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage
shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with
respects to the limits of the insurer's liability.
The Public Defender's insurance shall be primary and non-contributory insurance as
respects the City and shall contain a waiver of subrogation against the City for claims arising out
of any operations, liabilities and obligations to which coverage applies. It shall be an affirmative
obligation upon Public Defender to advise the City’s Risk Manager by fax at (360) 473-5161, or
by certified mail, return receipt requested to City of Bremerton, Attn: Risk Management, 345 6th
Street, Suite 100, Bremerton, WA 98337 within two days of the cancellation, suspension or
substantive change of any insurance policy set out herein, and failure to do so shall be construed
to be a breach of this Agreement.
The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason, proof of
coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as evidence of
coverage.
SECTION 17: ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS
A. All records required under this Agreement shall be maintained for a period of (6) years
after termination hereof unless permission to destroy them is granted by the Office of the
Archivist in accordance with RCW Chapter 40.14.
B. Willful failure to maintain or produce records or other required documentation during the
time for maintenance of records may result in specific, related costs being disallowed. In the
event the City has reason to believe that such a failure exists, notice shall be given to the Public
Defender and the Public Defender shall respond in writing. The time for notification and
response shall be the same as set forth in Section 11 (A).
SECTION 18: AUDITS, RECORDS, AND ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A. The Public Defender must ensure that the City has full access to materials necessary to
verify compliance with all terms of this Agreement. At any time, upon reasonable notice during
business hours and as often as the City may deem necessary for a period of six (6) years, the
Public Defender shall provide to the City right of access to its facilities, including those of any
subcontractor, data, and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. Provided
that if any such data, records or materials are subject to any privilege or rules of confidentiality
the Public Defender must maintain such data in a form or manner to provide same to the City
that will not breach such confidentiality or privilege.
The Public Defender shall maintain such data and records in an accessible location and condition
for a period of not less than six (6) years following the receipt of final payment under this
Agreement, unless the City agrees in writing to an earlier disposition.
The Public Defender agrees to cooperate with the City or its agent in the evaluation of the Public
Defender’s performance under this Agreement and to make available all information reasonably
required by any such evaluation process or ongoing reporting requirements established by the
14
Public Defense Services
City. The results and records of said evaluations and reports shall be maintained and disclosed in
accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17.
Notwithstanding any of the above provisions of this paragraph, all Constitutional, statutory,
and common law rights and privileges of any indigent client are not waived. Provided
further that nothing in this section shall require the disclosure of the names of any client
represented pursuant to RCW 13.34 et seq, or RCW 71.02 et seq, or RCW 71.05 et seq.
B. All such reports as are required under the terms of this Agreement shall be submitted to
the City via electronic media (e-mail attachment or diskette) within the time limits for each
report.
SECTION 19: CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP
The relationship of the Public Defender to the City by reason of this Agreement shall be that of
an independent contractor. This Agreement does not authorize the Public Defender to act as the
agent or legal representative of the City for any purpose whatsoever and neither the Public
Defender nor its employees shall be deemed employees of the City. The Public Defender is not
granted any express or implied right or authority to assume or create any obligation or
responsibility on behalf of or in the name of the City or to bind the City in any manner or thing
whatsoever. It is expressly understood and agreed that the Public Defender and the Public
Defender’s employees shall in no event be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are
entitled, including, but not limited to overtime, any retirement benefits, worker's compensation
benefits, and injury leave or leave benefits. The Public Defender shall complete this Agreement
according to the Public Defender’s own means and methods of work, which shall be in the
exclusive charge and control of the Public Defender and which shall not be subject to control or
supervision by the City, except such requirements for performance as are specified in this
Agreement.
The Public Defender agrees that it has secured or will secure at the Public Defender's own
expense, all persons, employees, and equipment required to perform the services
contemplated/required under this Agreement.
SECTION 20: ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
The Public Defender shall not assign or subcontract any of its obligations under this Agreement
without the City’s written consent, which may be granted or withheld in the City’s sole
discretion. Said consent must be sought in writing by the Public Defender not less than fifteen
(15) days prior to the date of any proposed assignment. Any subcontract made by the Public
Defender shall incorporate by reference all the terms of this Agreement. The Public Defender
shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the obligations and requirements of the
subcontract. The City’s consent to any assignment or subcontract shall not release the Public
Defender from liability under this Agreement, or from any obligation to be performed under this
Contract, whether occurring before or after such consent, assignment, or subcontract.
SECTION 21: INVOLVEMENT OF FORMER CITY EMPLOYEES
A. The Public Defender shall promptly notify the City in writing of any person who is
expected to perform any of the Work funded by this Agreement and who, during the twelve (12)
15
Public Defense Services
months immediately prior to the expected commencement date of such work or subcontract, was
a City officer or employee.
B. The Public Defender shall ensure that no Work or matter related to the Work funded by
this Agreement is performed by any person (employee, subcontractor, or otherwise) who:
(1) was a City officer or employee within the past twelve (12) months; and
(2) as such was officially involved in, participated in, or acted upon any matter
related to the Work.
SECTION 22: NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Public Defender confirms that the Public Defender does not have a business interest or a
close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was, is, or will be involved in
the Public Defender selection, negotiation, drafting, signing, administration, or evaluating the
Public Defender's performance. As used in this section, the term "Public Defender" shall include
any employee of the Public Defender who was, is, or will be involved in the negotiation,
drafting, signing, administration, or performance of the Agreement. As used in this section, the
term "close family relationship" refers to the following: spouse or domestic partner; any
dependent parent, parent-in-law, child, son-in-law, or daughter-in-law; or any parent, parent-in-
law, sibling, uncle, aunt, cousin, niece or nephew residing in the household of a City officer or
employee described above.
SECTION 23: ERRORS & OMISSIONS; CORRECTION
The Public Defender shall be responsible for the professional quality of all services furnished by
or on the behalf of the Public Defender under this Agreement. The Public Defender, without
additional compensation, shall correct or revise any Public Defender services immediately upon
notification by the City. The obligation provided for in this section with respect to any acts or
omissions during the term of this Agreement shall survive any termination or expiration of this
Agreement.
SECTION 24: CONFIDENTIALITY
The parties agree that they will not permit the duplication or disclosure of any information
designated in advance by the other party as "Confidential and Proprietary" to any person (other
than its own employee, agent, or representative who must have such information for the
performance of that party’s obligations hereunder) unless such duplication, use or disclosure is
specifically authorized in writing by the other party or is required by law. "Confidential and
Proprietary” information does not include ideas, concepts, know-how or techniques related to
information that, at the time of disclosure, is in the public domain unless the entry of that
information into the public domain is a result of any breach of this Agreement. Likewise,
"Confidential and Proprietary” information does not apply to information that is independently
developed, already possessed without obligation of confidentiality, or rightfully obtained from a
third party without an obligation of confidentiality.
16
Public Defense Services
SECTION 25: EXTRA WORK
The City may desire to have the Public Defender perform work or render services in connection
with this project other than that expressly provided for in the "Scope of Work" section of this
Agreement. This will be considered extra work, supplemental to this Agreement, and shall not
proceed unless authorized by an amendment. Any costs incurred due to the performance of extra
work prior to execution of an amendment will not be reimbursed under this Agreement or an
amendment.
SECTION 26: GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. Amendments: No modification of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and
signed by an authorized representative of each of the parties hereto.
B. Binding Agreement: This Agreement shall not be binding until signed by both parties.
The provisions, covenants and conditions in this Agreement shall bind the parties, their legal
heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns.
C. Applicable Law/Venue: This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The venue of any action brought
hereunder shall be in the Superior Court for Kitsap County.
D. Remedies Cumulative: Rights under this Agreement are cumulative and nonexclusive of
any other remedy at law or in equity.
E. Captions: The titles of sections are for convenience only and do not define or limit the
contents.
F. Severability: If any term or provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not
be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and
enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
G. Waiver: No covenant, term or condition or the breach thereof shall be deemed waived,
except by written consent of the party against whom the waiver is claimed, and any waiver of the
breach of any covenant, term or condition shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding or
succeeding breach of the same or any other covenant, term or condition. Neither the acceptance
by the City of any performance by the Public Defender after the time the same shall have
become due nor payment to the Public Defender for any portion of the Work shall constitute a
waiver by the City of the breach or default of any covenant, term or condition unless otherwise
expressly agreed to by the City, in writing.
H. Entire Agreement: This document, along with any exhibits and attachments, constitutes
the entire Agreement between the parties with respect to the Work. No verbal agreement or
conversation between any officer, agent, associate or employee of the City and any officer,
Public Defender, employee or associate of the Public Defender prior to the execution of this
Agreement shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in this Agreement.
17
Public Defense Services
I. Negotiated Agreement: The parties acknowledge that this is a negotiated agreement, that
they have had the opportunity to have this Agreement reviewed by their respective legal counsel,
and that the terms and conditions of this Agreement are not to be construed against any party on
the basis of such party's draftsmanship thereof.
J. Political Activity Prohibited: None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided
directly or indirectly under this Agreement shall be used in the performance of this Agreement
for any partisan political activity or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public
office.
K. Security Access: City shall provide Public Defender three (3) access codes for entry into
the court facility after hours, except that the Public Defender shall provide the names of those
individuals who will use the access codes.
L. Parking: City shall provide up to four (4) parking spaces as needed near the Municipal
Court for Public Defender Staff.
M. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties
at the addresses listed below by registered or 1st class mail, or by personal service, and shall be
deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such
other address as may be hereafter specified in writing.
Notices to be sent to: Notices to be sent to:
CITY: PUBLIC DEFENDER:
Attn: Melinda Monroe, Finance Attn: Jacob Murphy, Esq.
City of Bremerton LaCross and Murphy, PLLC
345 6th Street, Suite 100 559 Bay Street
Bremerton, WA 98337-1891 Port Orchard, WA 98366
N. Use of Photographs and Images: Public Defender shall not use or distribute photographs or
images depicting City officials, personnel, property, or equipment whether prepared by Public
Defender or provided by City without prior written consent of the City. The City will not
unreasonably withhold its consent.
O. Work Performed at Public Defender's Risk: Public Defender shall take all precautions
necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub -Public
Defenders in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protect ion necessary for
that purpose. All work shall be done at Public Defender's own risk, and Public Defender shall be
responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in
connection with the work.
18
Public Defense Services
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, in consideration of the terms, conditions, and covenants contained
herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties have executed this
Agreement by having their representatives affix their signatures below.
CITY OF BREMERTON LACROSS & MURPHY, PLLC
GREG WHEELER, MAYOR By: ____________________
Its:
Date: Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roger A. Lubovich, City Attorney
ATTEST:
______________________
Angela Hoover, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
CrR 3.1
STANDARDS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE
Preamble
The Washington Supreme Court adopts the following Standards to address certain basic
elements of public defense practice related to the effective assistance of counsel. The
Certification of Appointed Counsel of Compliance with Standards Required by CrR 3.1/CrRLJ
3.1/JuCR 9.2 references specific “Applicable Standards.” The Court adopts additional Standards
beyond those required for certification as guidance for public defense attorneys in addressing
issues identified in State v. A.N.J., 168 Wash.2d 91 (2010), including the suitability of contracts
that public defense attorneys may negotiate and sign. To the extent that certain Standards may
refer to or be interpreted as referring to local governments, the Court recognizes the authority of
its Rules is limited to attorneys and the courts. Local courts and clerks are encouraged to
develop protocols for procedures for receiving and retaining Certifications.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012.]
Standard 1. Compensation
[Reserved.]
Standard 2. Duties and Responsibilities of Counsel
[Reserved.]
Standard 3. Caseload Limits and Types of Cases
Standard 3.1. The contract or other employment agreement shall specify the types of
cases for which representation shall be provided and the maximum number of cases which each
attorney shall be expected to handle.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012.]
Standard 3.2. The caseload of public defense attorneys shall allow each lawyer to give
each client the time and effort necessary to ensure effective representation. Neither defender
organizations, county offices, contract attorneys, nor assigned counsel should accept workloads
that, by reason of their excessive size, interfere with the rendering of quality representation. As
used in this Standard, “quality representation” is intended to describe the minimum level of
attention, care, and skill that Washington citizens would expect of their state’s criminal justice
system.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012.]
Standard 3.3. General Considerations. Caseload limits reflect the maximum caseloads
for fully supported full-time defense attorneys for cases of average complexity and effort in each
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
case type specified. Caseload limits assume a reasonably even distribution of cases throughout
the year.
The increased complexity of practice in many areas will require lower caseload limits.
The maximum caseload limit should be adjusted downward when the mix of case assignments is
weighted toward offenses or case types that demand more investigation, legal research and
writing, use of experts, use of social workers, or other expenditures of time and resources.
Attorney caseloads should be assessed by the workload required, and cases and types of cases
should be weighted accordingly.
If a defender or assigned counsel is carrying a mixed caseload including cases from more
than one category of cases, these standards should be applied proportionately to determine a full
caseload. In jurisdictions where assigned counsel or contract attorneys also maintain private law
practices, the caseload should be based on the percentage of time the lawyer devotes to public
defense.
The experience of a particular attorney is a factor in the composition of the case types in
the attorney’s caseload, but it is not a factor in adjusting the applicable numerical caseload limits
except as follows: attorneys with less than six months of full time criminal defense experience
as an attorney should not be assigned more than two thirds of the applicable maximum numerical
caseload limit. This provision applies whether or not the public defense system uses case
weighting.
The following types of cases fall within the intended scope of the caseload limits for
criminal and juvenile offender cases in standard 3.4 and must be taken into account when
assessing an attorney’s numerical caseload: partial case representations, sentence violations,
specialty or therapeutic courts, transfers, extraditions, representation of material witnesses,
petitions for conditional release or final discharge, and other matters that do not involve a new
criminal charge.
Definition of case. A case is defined as the filing of a document with the court naming a
person as defendant or respondent, to which an attorney is appointed in order to provide
representation. In courts of limited jurisdiction multiple citations from the same incident can be
counted as one case.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012; amended effective January 1, 2015.]
Standard 3.4. Caseload Limits. The caseload of a full-time public defense attorney or
assigned counsel should not exceed the following:
150 felonies per attorney per year; or
300 misdemeanor cases per attorney per year or, in jurisdictions that have not adopted a
numerical case weighting system as described in this standard, 400 cases per year; or
250 juvenile offender cases per attorney per year; or
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
80 open juvenile dependency cases per attorney; or
250 civil commitment cases per attorney per year; or
1 active death penalty trial court case at a time plus a limited number of non-death-
penalty cases compatible with the time demand of the death penalty case and consistent with the
professional requirements of standard 3.2; or
36 appeals to an appellate court hearing a case on the record and briefs per attorney per
year. (The 36 standard assumes experienced appellate attorneys handling cases with transcripts
of an average length of 350 pages. If attorneys do not have significant appellate experience
and/or the average transcript length is greater than 350 pages, the caseload should be accordingly
reduced.)
Full-time rule 9 interns who have not graduated from law school may not have caseloads
that exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the caseload limits established for full-time attorneys.
In public defense systems in which attorneys are assigned to represent groups of clients at
first appearance or arraignment calendars without an expectation of further or continuing
representation for cases that are not resolved at the time (except by dismissal) in addition to
individual case assignments, the attorneys’ maximum caseloads should be reduced
proportionally recognizing that preparing for and appearing at such calendars requires additional
attorney time. This provision applies both to systems that employ case weighting and those that
do not.
Resolutions of cases by pleas of guilty to criminal charges on a first appearance or
arraignment docket are presumed to be rare occurrences requiring careful evaluation of the
evidence and the law, as well as thorough communication with clients, and must be counted as
one case. This provision applies both to systems that employ case weighting and those that do
not.
In public defense systems in which attorneys are assigned to represent groups of clients in
routine review hearing calendars in which there is no potential for the imposition of sanctions,
the attorneys’ maximum caseloads should be reduced proportionally by the amount of time they
spend preparing for and appearing at such calendars. This provision applies whether or not the
public defense system uses case weighting.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2013, except paragraph 3, regarding misdemeanor caseload limits,
effective January 1, 2015; amended effective January 1, 2015.]
Standard 3.5. Case Counting and Weighting. Attorneys may not count cases using a
case weighting system, unless pursuant to written policies and procedures that have been adopted
and published by the local government entity responsible for employing, contracting with, or
appointing them. A weighting system must:
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
A. recognize the greater or lesser workload required for cases compared to an
average case based on a method that adequately assesses and documents the
workload involved;
B. be consistent with these Standards, professional performance guidelines, and the
Rules of Professional Conduct;
C. not institutionalize systems or practices that fail to allow adequate attorney time
for quality representation;
D. be periodically reviewed and updated to reflect current workloads; and
E. be filed with the State of Washington Office of Public Defense.
Cases should be assessed by the workload required. Cases and types of cases should be
weighted accordingly. Cases which are complex, serious, or contribute more significantly to
attorney workload than average cases should be weighted upward. In addition, a case weighting
system should consider factors that might justify a case weight of less than one case.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012; amended effective January 1, 2015.]
Standard 3.6. Case Weighting Examples. The following are some examples of situations
where case weighting might result in representations being weighted as more or less than one
case. The listing of specific examples is not intended to suggest or imply that representations in
such situations should or must be weighted at more or less than one case, only that they may be,
if established by an appropriately adopted case weighting system.
A. Case Weighting Upward. Serious offenses or complex cases that demand more-
than-average investigation, legal research, writing, use of experts, use of social
workers, and/or expenditures of time and resources should be weighted upward
and counted as more than one case.
B. Case Weighting Downward. Listed below are some examples of situations where
case weighting might justify representations being weighted less than one case.
However, care must be taken because many such representations routinely
involve significant work and effort and should be weighted at a full case or more.
i. Cases that result in partial representations of clients, including client
failures to appear and recommencement of proceedings, preliminary
appointments in cases in which no charges are filed, appearances of
retained counsel, withdrawals or transfers for any reason, or limited
appearances for a specific purpose (not including representations of
multiple cases on routine dockets).
ii. Cases in the criminal or offender case type that do not involve filing of
new criminal charges, including sentence violations, extraditions,
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
representations of material witnesses, and other matters or representations
of clients that do not involve new criminal charges. Noncomplex sentence
violations should be weighted as at least 1/3 of a case.
iii. Cases in specialty or therapeutic courts if the attorney is not responsible
for defending the client against the underlying charges before or after the
client’s participation in the specialty or therapeutic court. However, case
weighting must recognize that numerous hearings and extended
monitoring of client cases in such courts significantly contribute to
attorney workload and in many instances such cases may warrant
allocation of full case weight or more.
iv. Representation of a person in a court of limited jurisdiction on a charge
which, as a matter of regular practice in the court where the case is
pending, can be and is resolved at an early stage of the proceeding by a
diversion, reduction to an infraction, stipulation on continuance, or other
alternative noncriminal disposition that does not involve a finding of guilt.
Such cases should be weighted as at least 1/3 of a case.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012; amended effective January 1, 2015.]
Related Standards
ABA STANDARDS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE: PROSECUTION FUNCTION AND DEFENSE
FUNCTION Defense Function std. 4-1.2 (3d ed. 1993)
ABA STANDARDS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE: PROVIDING DEFENSE SERVICES std. 5-4.3 (3d
ed. 1992)
AM. BAR ASS’N, GUIDELINES FOR THE APPOINTMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF DEFENSE
COUNSEL IN DEATH PENALTY CASES (rev. ed. 2003)
ABA Comm. on Ethics & Prof’l Responsibility, Formal Op. 06-441 (2006) (Ethical
Obligations of Lawyers Who Represent Indigent Criminal Defendants When Excessive
Caseloads Interfere With Competent and Diligent Representation)
Am. Council of Chief Defenders, Statement on Caseloads and Workloads (Aug. 24,
2007)
ABA House of Delegates, Eight Guidelines of Public Defense Related to Excessive
Caseloads (Aug. 2009)
TASK FORCE ON COURTS, NAT’L ADVISORY COMM’N ON CRIMINAL STANDARDS & GOALS,
COURTS std. 13.12 (1973)
MODEL CODE OF PROF’L RESPONSIBILITY DR 6-101.
ABA House of Delegates, The Ten Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System (Feb.
2002)
ABA House of Delegates, Standards of Practice for Lawyers Who Represent Children in
Abuse and Neglect Cases (Feb. 1996)
Nat’l Legal Aid & Defender Ass’n, Am. Council of Chief Defenders, Ethical Opinion 03-
01 (2003).
Nat’l Legal Aid & Defender Ass’n, Standards for Defender Services std. IV-1 (1976)
Nat’l Legal Aid & Defender Ass’n, Model Contract for Public Defense Services (2000)
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
Nat’l Ass’n of Counsel for Children, NACC Recommendations for Representation of
Children in Abuse and Neglect Cases (2001)
Seattle Ordinance 121501 (June 14, 2004)
Indigent Defense Servs. Task Force, Seattle-King County Bar Ass’n, Guidelines for
Accreditation of Defender Agencies Guideline 1 (1982)
Wash. State Office of Pub. Defense, Parents Representation Program Standards of
Representation (2009)
BUREAU OF JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE, U.S. DEP’T OF JUSTICE, INDIGENT DEFENSE SERIES NO.
4, KEEPING DEFENDER WORKLOADS MANAGEABLE (2001) (NCJ 185632)
Standard 4. Responsibility of Expert Witnesses
[Reserved.]
Standard 5. Administrative Costs
Standard 5.1. [Reserved.]
Standard 5.2.
A. Contracts for public defense services should provide for or include administrative
costs associated with providing legal representation. These costs should include but are not
limited to travel; telephones; law library, including electronic legal research; financial
accounting; case management systems; computers and software; office space and supplies;
training; meeting the reporting requirements imposed by these standards; and other costs
necessarily incurred in the day-to-day management of the contract.
B. Public defense attorneys shall have (1) access to an office that accommodates
confidential meetings with clients and (2) a postal address, and adequate telephone services to
ensure prompt response to client contact.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012.]
Standard 6. Investigators
Standard 6.1. Public defense attorneys shall use investigation services as appropriate.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012.]
Standards 7-12
[Reserved.]
Standard 13. Limitations on Private Practice
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
Private attorneys who provide public defense representation shall set limits on the amount
of privately retained work which can be accepted. These limits shall be based on the percentage
of a full-time caseload which the public defense cases represent.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012.]
Standard 14. Qualifications of Attorneys
Standard 14.1. In order to assure that indigent accused receive the effective assistance of
counsel to which they are constitutionally entitled, attorneys providing defense services shall
meet the following minimum professional qualifications:
A. Satisfy the minimum requirements for practicing law in Washington as
determined by the Washington Supreme Court; and
B. Be familiar with the statutes, court rules, constitutional provisions, and case law
relevant to their practice area; and
C. Be familiar with the Washington Rules of Professional Conduct; and
D. Be familiar with the Performance Guidelines for Criminal Defense Representation
approved by the Washington State Bar Association and when representing youth,
be familiar with the Performance Guidelines for Juvenile Defense Representation
approved by the Washington State Bar Association; and
E. Be familiar with the consequences of a conviction or adjudication, including
possible immigration consequences and the possibility of civil commitment
proceedings based on a criminal conviction; and
F. Be familiar with mental health issues and be able to identify the need to obtain
expert services; and
G. Complete seven hours of continuing legal education within each calendar year in
courses relating to their public defense practice.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012; amended effective April 24, 2018.]
Standard 14.2. Attorneys' qualifications according to severity or type of case 1:
A. Death Penalty Representation. Each attorney acting as lead counsel in a criminal
case in which the death penalty has been or may be decreed and which the
decision to seek the death penalty has not yet been made shall meet the following
requirements:
1 Attorneys working toward qualification for a particular category of cases under this standard may associate with lead counsel
who is qualified under this standard for that category of cases.
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1; and
ii. At least five years’ criminal trial experience; and
iii. Have prior experience as lead counsel in no fewer than nine jury trials of
serious and complex cases which were tried to completion; and
iv. Have served as lead or co-counsel in at least one aggravated homicide
case; and
v. Have experience in preparation of mitigation packages in aggravated
homicide or persistent offender cases; and
vi. Have completed at least one death penalty defense seminar within the
previous two years; and
vii. Meet the requirements of SPRC 2.2
The defense team in a death penalt y case should include, at a minimum, the two attorneys
appointed pursuant to SPRC 2, a mitigation specialist, and an investigator. Psychiatrists,
psychologists, and other experts and support personnel should be added as needed.
B. Adult Felony Cases—Class A. Each attorney representing a defendant accused of
a Class A felony as defined in RCW 9A.20.020 shall meet the following
requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1; and
ii. Either:
a. has served two years as a prosecutor; or
2
SPRC 2
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
At least two lawyers shall be appointed for the trial and also for the direct appeal. The trial court shall retain responsibility
for appointing counsel for trial. The Supreme Court shall appoint counsel for the direct appeal. Notwithstanding RAP 15.2(f) and
(h), the Supreme Court will determine all motions to withdraw as counsel on appeal.
A list of attorneys who meet the requirements of proficiency and experience, and who have demonstrated that they are
learned in the law of capital punishment by virtue of training or experience, and thus are qualified for appointment in death
penalty trials and for appeals will be recruited and maintained by a panel created by the Supreme Court. All counsel for trial and
appeal must have demonstrated the proficiency and commitment to quality representation which is appropriate to a capital case.
Both counsel at trial must have five years’ experience in the practice of criminal law (and) be familiar with and experienced in the
utilization of expert witnesses and evidence, and not be presently serving as appointed counsel in another active trial level death
penalty case. One counsel must be, and both may be, qualified for appointment in capital trials on the list, unless circumstances
exist such that it is in the defendant’s interest to appoint otherwise qualified counsel learned in the law of capital punishment by
virtue of training or experience. The trial court shall make findings of fact if good cause is found for not appointing list counsel.
At least one counsel on appeal must have three years’ experience in the field of criminal appellate law and be learned in the
law of capital punishment by virtue of training or experience. In appointing counsel on appeal, the Supreme Court will consider
the list, but will have the final discretion in the appointment of counsel.
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
b. has served two years as a public defender; or two years in a private
criminal practice; and
iii. Has been trial counsel alone or with other counsel and handled a
significant portion of the trial in three felony cases that have been
submitted to a jury.
C. Adult Felony Cases—Class B Violent Offense. Each attorney representing a
defendant accused of a Class B violent offense as defined in RCW 9A.20.020
shall meet the following requirements.
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1; and
ii. Either;
a. has served one year as a prosecutor; or
b. has served one year as a public defender; or one year in a private
criminal practice; and
iii. Has been trial counsel alone or with other counsel and handled a
significant portion of the trial in two Class C felony cases that have been
submitted to a jury.
D. Adult Sex Offense Cases. Each attorney representing a client in an adult sex
offense case shall meet the following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1 and Section 2(C); and
ii. Has been counsel alone of record in an adult or juvenile sex offense case
or shall be supervised by or consult with an attorney who has experience
representing juveniles or adults in sex offense cases.
E. Adult Felony Cases—All Other Class B Felonies, Class C Felonies, Probation or
Parole Revocation. Each attorney representing a defendant accused of a Class B
felony not defined in Section 2(C) or (D) above or a Class C felony, as defined in
RCW 9A.20.020, or involved in a probation or parole revocation hearing shall
meet the following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1, and
ii. Either:
a. has served one year as a prosecutor; or
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
b. has served one year as a public defender; or one year in a private
criminal practice; and
iii. Has been trial counsel alone or with other trial counsel and handled a
significant portion of the trial in two criminal cases that have been
submitted to a jury; and
iv. Each attorney shall be accompanied at his or her first felony trial by a
supervisor if available.
F. Persistent Offender (Life Without Possibility of Release) Representation. Each
attorney acting as lead counsel in a “two strikes” or “three strikes” case in which a
conviction will result in a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole
shall meet the following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1;3 and
ii. Have at least:
a. four years’ criminal trial experience; and
b. one year’s experience as a felony defense attorney; and
c. experience as lead counsel in at least one Class A felony trial; and
d. experience as counsel in cases involving each of the following:
1. Mental health issues; and
2. Sexual offenses, if the current offense or a prior conviction
that is one of the predicate cases resulting in the possibility
of life in prison without parole is a sex offense; and
3. Expert witnesses; and
4. One year of appellate experience or demonstrated legal
writing ability.
G. Juvenile Cases—Class A. Each attorney representing a juvenile accused of a
Class A felony shall meet the following requirements:
3 RCW 10.101.060(1)(a)(iii) provides that counties receiving funding from the state Office of Public Defense under that statute
must require “attorneys who handle the most serious cases to meet specified qualifications as set forth in the Washington state bar
association endorsed standards for public defense services or participate in at least one case consultation per case with office of
public defense resource attorneys who are so qualified. The most serious cases include all cases of murder in the first or second
degree, persistent offender cases, and class A felonies.”
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1, and
ii. Either:
a. has served one year as a prosecutor; or
b. has served one year as a public defender; or one year in a private
criminal practice; and
iii. Has been trial counsel alone of record in five Class B and C felony trials;
and
iv. Each attorney shall be accompanied at his or her first juvenile trial by a
supervisor, if available.
H. Juvenile Cases—Classes B and C. Each attorney representing a juvenile accused
of a Class B or C felony shall meet the following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1; and
ii. Either:
a. has served one year as a prosecutor; or
b. has served one year as a public defender; or one year in a private
criminal practice, and
iii. Has been trial counsel alone in five misdemeanor cases brought to a final
resolution; and
iv. Each attorney shall be accompanied at his or her first juvenile trial by a
supervisor if available.
I. Juvenile Sex Offense Cases. Each attorney representing a client in a juvenile sex
offense case shall meet the following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1 and Section 2(H); and
ii. Has been counsel alone of record in an adult or juvenile sex offense case
or shall be supervised by or consult with an attorney who has experience
representing juveniles or adults in sex offense cases.
J. Juvenile Status Offenses Cases. Each attorney representing a client in a “Becca”
matter shall meet the following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements as outlined in Section 1; and
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
ii. Either:
a. have represented clients in at least two similar cases under the
supervision of a more experienced attorney or completed at least
three hours of CLE training specific to “status offense” cases; or
b. have participated in at least one consultation per case with a more
experienced attorney who is qualified under this section.
K. Misdemeanor Cases. Each attorney representing a defendant involved in a matter
concerning a simple misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor or condition of
confinement, shall meet the requirements as outlined in Section 1.
L. Dependency Cases. Each attorney representing a client in a dependency matter shall
meet the following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements as outlined in Section 1; and
ii. Attorneys handling termination hearings shall have six months’
dependency experience or have significant experience in handling
complex litigation.
iii. Attorneys in dependency matters should be familiar with expert services
and treatment resources for substance abuse.
iv. Attorneys representing children in dependency matters should have
knowledge, training, experience, and ability in communicating effectively
with children, or have participated in at least one consultation per case
either with a state Office of Public Defense resource attorney or other
attorney qualified under this section.
M. Civil Commitment Cases. Each attorney representing a respondent shall meet the
following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1; and
ii. Each staff attorney shall be accompanied at his or her first 90 or 180 day
commitment hearing by a supervisor; and
iii. Shall not represent a respondent in a 90 or 180 day commitment hearing
unless he or she has either:
a. served one year as a prosecutor; or
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
b. served one year as a public defender; or one year in a private civil
commitment practice, and
c. been trial counsel in five civil commitment initial hearings; and
iv. Shall not represent a respondent in a jury trial unless he or she has
conducted a felony jury trial as lead counsel; or been co-counsel with a
more experienced attorney in a 90 or 180 day commitment hearing.
N. Sex Offender “Predator” Commitment Cases. Generally, there should be two
counsel on each sex offender commitment case. The lead counsel shall meet the
following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1; and
ii. Have at least:
a. Three years’ criminal trial experience; and
b. One year’s experience as a felony defense attorney or one year’s
experience as a criminal appeals attorney; and
c. Experience as lead counsel in at least one felony trial; and
d. Experience as counsel in cases involving each of the following:
1. Mental health issues; and
2. Sexual offenses; and
3. Expert witnesses; and
e. Familiarity with the Civil Rules; and
f. One year of appellate experience or demonstrated legal writing
ability.
Other counsel working on a sex offender commitment case should meet the minimum
requirements in Section 1 and have either one year’s experience as a public defender or
significant experience in the preparation of criminal cases, including legal research and writing
and training in trial advocacy.
O. Contempt of Court Cases. Each attorney representing a respondent shall meet the
following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1; and
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
ii. Each attorney shall be accompanied at his or her first three contempt of
court hearings by a supervisor or more experienced attorney, or participate
in at least one consultation per case with a state Office of Public Defense
resource attorney or other attorney qualified in this area of practice.
P. Specialty Courts. Each attorney representing a client in a specialty court (e.g.,
mental health court, drug diversion court, homelessness court) shall meet the
following requirements:
i. The minimum requirements set forth in Section 1; and
ii. The requirements set forth above for representation in the type of practice
involved in the specialty court (e.g., felony, misdemeanor, juvenile); and
iii. Be familiar with mental health and substance abuse issues and treatment
alternatives.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012.]
Standard 14.3. Appellate Representation. Each attorney who is counsel for a case on
appeal to the Washington Supreme Court or to the Washington Court of Appeals shall meet the
following requirements:
A. The minimum requirements as outlined in Section 1; and
B. Either:
i. has filed a brief with the Washington Supreme Court or any Washington
Court of Appeals in at least one criminal case within the past two years; or
ii. has equivalent appellate experience, including filing appellate briefs in
other jurisdictions, at least one year as an appellate court or federal court
clerk, extensive trial level briefing, or other comparable work.
C. Attorneys with primary responsibility for handling a death penalty appeal shall
have at least five years' criminal experience, preferably including at least one
homicide trial and at least six appeals from felony convictions, and meet the
requirements of SPRC 2.
RALJ Misdemeanor Appeals to Superior Court: Each attorney who is counsel alone for a
case on appeal to the Superior Court from a court of limited jurisdiction should meet the
minimum requirements as outlined in Section 1, and have had significant training or experience
in either criminal appeals, criminal motions practice, extensive trial level briefing, clerking for an
appellate judge, or assisting a more experienced attorney in preparing and arguing a RALJ
appeal.
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012.]
Standard 14.4. Legal Interns.
A. Legal interns must meet the requirements set out in APR 9.
B. Legal interns shall receive training pursuant to APR 9, and in offices of more than
seven attorneys, an orientation and training program for new attorneys and legal
interns should be held.
[Adopted effective October 1, 2012.]
Standards 15-18
[Reserved.]
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
For criminal and juvenile offender cases, a signed Certification of Compliance with
Applicable Standards must be filed by an appointed attorney by separate written certification on
a quarterly basis in each court in which the attorney has been appointed as counsel.
The certification must be in substantially the following form:
EXHIBIT A: WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE STANDARDS
SEPARATE CERTIFICATION FORM
__________________________ Court of Washington
for _______________________________________
[ ] No.: __________________
[ ] Administrative Filing
State of Washington_______________________,
Plaintiff
vs.
_______________________________________,
Defendant
CERTIFICATION OF APPOINTED
COUNSEL OF COMPLIANCE WITH
STANDARDS REQUIRED BY CrR 3.1
/ CrRLJ 3.1 / JuCR 9.2
The undersigned attorney hereby certifies:
1. Approximately _____% of my total practice time is devoted to indigent defense cases.
2. I am familiar with the applicable Standards adopted by the Supreme Court for attorneys
appointed to represent indigent persons and that:
a. Basic Qualifications: I meet the minimum basic professional qualifications in
Standard 14.1.
b. Office: I have access to an office that accommodates confidential meetings with
clients, and I have a postal address and adequate telephone services to ensure prompt
response to client contact, in compliance with Standard 5.2.
c. Investigators: I have investigators available to me and will use investigative
services as appropriate, in compliance with Standard 6.1.
d. Caseload: I will comply with Standard 3.2 during representation of the defendant in
my cases. [Effective October 1, 2013 for felony and juvenile offender caseloads; effective
January 1, 2015 for misdemeanor caseloads: I should not accept a greater number of cases
(or a proportional mix of different case types) than specified in Standard 3.4, prorated if the
amount of time spent for indigent defense is less than full time, and taking into account the
case counting and weighting system applicable in my jurisdiction.]
e. Case Specific Qualifications: I am familiar with the specific case qualifications in
Standard 14.2, Sections B-K and will not accept appointment in a case as lead counsel unless
I meet the qualifications for that case. [Effective October 1, 2013]
_________________________________________ ___________________
Signature, WSBA# Date
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Interagency Agreement between the
Washington State Administrative Office of
the Courts and Bremerton Municipal Court
for Interpreter Grant Funds
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: Municipal Court
Presenter: Dawn Williams
Phone: (360) 473-5242
SUMMARY: : This Interagency Agreement between the Administrative Office of the Courts and the
Bremerton Municipal Court provides reimbursement for up to 50% of interpreter costs not to exceed
$3,358.00 from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020.
ATTACHMENTS: Interagency Agreement IAA20147 between the Administrative Office of the Courts
and Bremerton Municipal Court.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Reimbursement Funding in an amount not to
exceed $3,358.00. No matching funds are required.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ Limited Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to accept the Interagency Agreement IAA20147 between the Washington State Administrative
Office of the Courts and the Bremerton Municipal Court ;and authorize the Court Administrator to
finalize execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A2
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Washington State Department of Ecology
(DOE) 2019-2021 Biennial Stormwater
Capacity Grant
Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: PW&U ---------Presenter: Chance Berthiaume
Phone: (360) 473-5929
SUMMARY:
DOE is providing a no match grant for $95,000 to assist in the implementation and management of
the municipal stormwater program. The overall goal is to improve water quality by reducing
stormwater pollutants discharged to state water bodies.
ATTACHMENTS:
Water quality stormwater capacity agreement between the Washington State Department of Ecology
and City of Bremerton.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
A $95,000 no match grant to the Stormwater Utility to assist with implementation of the NPDES
Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit requirements beginning July 1, 2019 through March 31, 2021.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: 181 Limited Presentation D Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: D Consent Agenda
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
D General Business D Public Hearing
Move to accept the 2019-2021 Biennial Stormwater Capacity Grant with the Washington State
Department of Ecology and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with
substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0Deny 0 Table 0 Continue D No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A3
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Purchase of 12.5% Bulk Sodium
Hypochlorite Solution from HASA, Inc. for
the Westside Wastewater Treatment Plant
Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: PW &U/WWTP
Presenter: Rick Zimburean
Phone: (360) 473-5449
SUMMARY: Requests for proposals were submitted to four Chemical Companies. Three proposals
were received in response to a request from the city for furnishing 12.5% bulk sodium hypochlorite
low-salt solution to the Westside WWTP. HASA, Inc., of Longview, WA submitted a proposal for low-
salt, sodium hypochlorite at $0.925/gallon delivered to the Westside WWTP. The proposal also
included $150 split-load fee when delivery is made to the Westside WWTP and to city lift station OC-
1 located at 2100 12th Street or OC-3 located at 1730 Park Avenue. The proposal will have firm
pricing for a one-year term, from the time the proposal agreement is signed. HASA, Inc., cost
including tax is the lowest proposed to the city.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Sodium Hypochlorite proposals from HASA, Inc., JCI Jones Chemicals, Inc.,
Univar Solutions, and NorthStar Chemical
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): These purchases are budgeted through the
WWTP Operating Supplies budget of $540,000.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ Limited Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the proposal to purchase bulk low salt 12.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for a
period of one year from HASA, Inc. at a cost of $0.925/gallon delivered; and authorize the
Wastewater Manager to make these purchases on an as needed basis.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A4
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Grant of Easement to Puget Sound Energy,
Inc. (PSE) for Power System Improvement
along Belfair Valley Road
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: PW&U
Presenter: Tom Knuckey
Phone: (360) 473-2376
SUMMARY:
Puget Sound Energy is requesting the City grant an easement for a project to improve power
reliability on Belfair Valley Road. The project will install more robust “tree wire” and will also install a
vault and appurtenances on City utility land. To complete the work PSE requires an easement of
approximately 833 square feet.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Easement; 2) Real Property Voucher Form
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): PSE will compensate the City $1,500 for the
Easement
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ Limited Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to authorize the granting of an easement to Puget Sound Energy, Inc. for power system
improvement along Belfair Valley Road; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the
agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A5
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter
2.78 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Real Property Transactions”
Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: City Council
Presenter: Eric Younger
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: This update to the Bremerton Municipal Code updates language in Chapter 2.78 to
allow the Mayor or designee to approve real property transactions without City Council approval
when the value of the transaction does not exceed $10,000.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Ordinance No.______
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ Limited Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Ordinance No._______ amending Chapter 2.78 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Real Property Transactions”.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A6
Chapter 2.78 BMC -
Real Property Transactions
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending provisions of Chapter 2.78 of
the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Real Property
Transactions".
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend provisions of Chapter 2.78 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code relating to City Council approval of purchases and sales of real
property and to make related changes; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 2.78 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Real
Property Transactions" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2.78.010 PURCHASES AND SALES.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, Tthe City Council shall approve all
purchases of real property and shall surplus as appropriate and approve all sales of real property
by the City.
(b) When disposing of real property, the City may list the property with a real estate
broker, negotiate directly with a prospective purchaser or utilize any other appropriate means to
sell the property.
(c) If the City determines that the real property has value only to an abutting owner of
land because of the size, shape, topography, feature or restriction of the property, the City shall
notify the abutting owner that the property is for sale to allow them an opportunity to submit an
offer to purchase the property and/or to match any offer presented.
(d) Subject to the provisions of this chapter, all real property purchases and sales shall
be pursuant to terms and conditions as approved by the City Council., except as provided in
subsection (e) below.
(e) The purchase or sale of real property including easements and the granting or
acquisitions of rights-of-way with a purchase or sale cost which does not exceed ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00) may be approved by the Mayor or designee and shall not require City
Council approval.
2.78.020 LEASES.
The leasing of real property by or to the City for a term which, including options, does
not exceeds two (2) years and/or rent or lease payments which does not exceeds ten thousand
dollars ($10,000) per year may be approved by the Mayor or designee and shall not require the
approval of the City Council approval.
Chapter 2.78 BMC -
Real Property Transactions
2.78.030 RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITIONS.
City Council approval of project budgets or condemnation proceedings for right-of-way,
easement or other land acquisitions for street or road development or improvements shall
constitute City Council approval for the purpose of BMC 2.78.010.
2.78.040 UTILITY PROPERTY - SURPLUSING.
Prior to the sale or lease of City public utility real property, the City Council shall, by
resolution, surplus and authorize the sale or lease of said property following a public hearing
pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35.94.040.
2.78.050 PARKS PROPERTY.
The sale or lease of parks property as designated in BMC 13.12.020 shall be subject to
the provisions of the Parks Protection Code, Chapter 13.12 BMC.
2.78.060 INTERGOVERNMENTAL SALES AND LEASES.
Prior to the sale or lease of surplus City property having an estimated value of more than
fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to another governmental entity, the City Council shall hold a
hearing following notice pursuant to the provisions of RCW 39.33.020.
2.78.070 RELOCATION
Pursuant to RCW 8.26.010(2), the City hereby elects not to comply with the provisions of
RCW 8.26.035 through 8.26.115 regarding moving and related expenses when acquiring
property in connection with a program or project not receiving federal financial assistance.
SECTION 2. Corrections. The City Clerk and codifiers of this ordinance are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the
correction of scrivener, clerical, typographical, and spelling errors, references, ordinance
numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.
SECTION 3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences
of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and
effect.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the___________ day of ____________________, 2019.
_________________________________
ERIC YOUNGER, Council President
Chapter 2.78 BMC -
Real Property Transactions
Approved this ________ day of ________________________, 2019.
_________________________________
GREG WHEELER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ _________________________________
ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the ________ day of ______________________, 2019.
EFFECTIVE the ________ day of ______________________, 2019.
ORDINANCE NO. ________.
R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Legal\2019.09.30 BMC 2.78 Real Property Transactions Ordinance3.docx
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Ordinance amending Chapter
2.92 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Insurance Coverage and Claims
Management”
Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: City Council
Presenter: Eric Younger
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: This update to the Bremerton Municipal Code updates language in Chapter 2.92 to
allow the City Attorney or designee to approve the purchase of an insurance policy without City
Council approval when the annual premium does not exceed $25,000. Further amends the chapter
correct language relating to claims management.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Ordinance No.______
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ Limited Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Ordinance No._______ amending Chapter 2.92 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Insurance Coverage and Claims Management”.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A7
1
BMC 2.92.040 – Risk Management
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Sections 2.92.040 and 2.92.060
of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the purchase of
insurance policies, funded self-insurance programs, pooled
coverage and related services, and amending language relating to
claims management.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the provisions of Section 2.92.040
of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the purchase of insurance policies, funded self-
insurance programs, pooled coverage and related services; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the provisions of Section 2.92.060
of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to claims management to correct language; NOW
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 2.92.040 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Insurance/Self-Insurance/Pooled Coverage Programs" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2.92.040 INSURANCE/SELF-INSURANCE/POOLED COVERAGE
PROGRAMS.
The Risk Management Specialist is responsible for the procurement and administration of
all insured, self-insured and/or pooled property, casualty and liability coverage programs:
(a) The Risk Management Specialist may, with the approval of the City Attorney,
negotiate with insurance brokers for any type of insurance and may recommend that the City
engage the services of such brokers;.
(b) The Risk Management Specialist shall purchase all insurance policies including
funded self-insurance programs, pooled coverage and related services, and shall administer the
same. The purchase of any policy shall be as follows:
1. For any insurance policy with an annual premium of twenty-five thousand
dollars ($25,000.00) or less, the Risk Management Specialist may purchase the policy with the
approval of the City Attorney, or designee. Such purchase shall not require City Council approval.
2. For any insurance policy with an annual premium exceeding twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00), the Risk Management Specialist, with the approval of the City
Attorney, or designee, is authorized to bind policy coverage without prior City Council approval
subject to budget authority. Within sixty (60) days of binding coverage, the Risk Management
Specialist shall advise City Council that coverage was bound and seek City Council approval for
continuation of the bound coverage.
(b) The Risk Management Specialist shall purchase, with the approval of the City
Attorney and City Council, all insurance policies, funded self-insurance programs, pooled
coverage and related services, and shall administer the same. The Risk Management Specialist,
2
BMC 2.92.040 – Risk Management
with the approval of the City Attorney, is authorized to bind property, casualty, and surety
insurance coverage without prior approval by City Council subject to budget authority. Within
sixty (60) days of binding coverage, the Risk Management Specialist shall advise City Council
that coverage was bound and seek City Council approval for continuation of the bound coverage;
(c) The Risk Management Specialist shall make an annual report to the City Council
regarding insurance coverage and the level of retained risk, and such other reports as may be
required by the Council.
SECTION 2. Section 2.92.060 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Claims Management – Non-Litigation Claims" is hereby amended to correct language in
Subsection (d) as follows:
2.92.060 CLAIMS MANAGEMENT - NON-LITIGATION CLAIMS.
The Risk Management Specialist shall be responsible for the investigation and evaluation
of all non-litigation claims by or against the City.
(a) The City Clerk is hereby designated to receive all claims. He/she shall forward to
the Risk Management Specialist all non-litigation claims naming the City and/or its officers or
employees, which claims allege that said officers or employees, acting within the scope of their
duties, caused the claimant damages.
(b) All City departments, divisions and other City agencies shall report immediately to
the Risk Management Specialist the occurrence of any accident or incident which may give rise
to a claim by or against the City to ensure prompt investigation of the incident.
(c) The Risk Management Specialist shall initiate and/or coordinate the investigation of
all non-litigation claims. The Risk Management Specialist may employ, subject to the City
Attorney’s approval, the services of claims specialists. All investigation of non-litigation claims
and potential claims shall be conducted as the agent of the City Attorney, and protected by the
attorney-client privilege and attorney work product rule, to the extent allowed by law.
(d) The City Attorney shall have the authority to negotiate and approve the settlement
of any non-litigation claim; provided, however, the settlement of any such claim in excess of
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) shall require the approval of the Mayor and the
settlement of any non-litigation claim in excess of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) shall be
subject to the approval of the City Council.
(e) The Risk Management Specialist shall maintain complete histories of all non-
litigation claims reported to the Office of Risk Management, and investigation thereof sufficient
to document at least a seven (7) year claims history or such other period of time deemed
necessary for purposes of reporting claims history to insurance companies.
SECTION 3. Corrections. The City Clerk and codifiers of this ordinance are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the
correction of scrivener, clerical, typographical, and spelling errors, references, ordinance
numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
3
BMC 2.92.040 – Risk Management
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the___________ day of ____________________, 2019
_________________________________
ERIC YOUNGER, Council President
Approved this ________ day of ________________________, 2019
_________________________________
GREG WHEELER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ ________________________________
ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the________ day of ______________________, 2019
EFFECTIVE the_________day of ______________________, 2019
ORDINANCE NO. ____________
R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Risk\Section 2.92 Insurance Purchase 2019 - Final.doc
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Public Hearing approving Substantial
Amendment to the 2018 CDBG/HOME
Action Plan
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: DCD-CDBG
Presenter: Sarah Achaoui
Phone: (360) 473-5375
SUMMARY: Annually the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) reviews the
performance of each entitlement community according to 24 CFR 570.902. On November 1 of each
calendar year HUD runs a formula calculation and the amount of entitlement grant funds available to
the recipient under grant agreements but undisbursed by the U.S. Treasury must be under 1.5 times
the entitlement grant amount for its current program year. Currently, the City of Bremerton is over the
1.5 ratio by $119,389, a 1.75 ratio. There is a significant unspent balance on the 2018 Public Works
and Utilities Quincy Square Engineering and Design Project with no real plan to get the funding
drawn down in a timely manner.
To remedy, to ensure CFR compliance, is to create a substantial amendment to the 2018 CDBG
Annual Action Plan to transfer unspent funding in the amount of $120,000 from the Quincy Square
project and create a new activity. The City’s CDBG Policy Plan outlines the procedures that must be
followed to make an amendment to the grant awards. The plan requires that the Project Review
Committee must meet and make a funding recommendation. That recommendation is published and
a 30-day public comment period is opened. The comment period ran from September 25th-October
26th all public comments have been forwarded to the City Council for review.
ATTACHMENTS:
Memo with Project Review Committee Priorities number 1 and 2
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): No fiscal impacts to the City.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ Limited Presentation ☒ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☒ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the substantial amendment to the 2018 CDBG/HOME Action plan to remove
$120,000 from Quincy Square to: ________________________________________________
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A8
To: Bremerton City Council
From: Sarah Achaoui
Date: October 23, 2019
Re: Public Hearing to Adopt Substantial Amendment to the 2018 CDBG/HOME Action Plan
What a Substantial Amendment?
A substantial amendment, as defined in the 2020 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan is a change in the use of
CDBG or HOME funds from one eligible activity to another. The Project Review Committee (PRC) is
tasked with reviewing changes and making a recommendation of any funding change. A substantial
amendment was published in the Kitsap Sun on September 25th and was subject to a 30-day public
comment period, which many public comments were received. The Bremerton City Council has to
adopt the final change.
Why are we doing a Substantial Amendment to the 2018 CDBG/HOME Action Plan?
The City is experiencing a timeliness issue with expenditures of 2018 funds. According to 24 CFR
570.902 the City cannot have more than 1.5 times the entitlement grant amount for its current
program year sitting in its Line of Credit. Currently we are at 1.75 times the current grant amount
($120,000). Since we will not have those funds drawn down by November 1st (the date of the test),
we must immediately create a substantial amendment to the 2018 plan to create a new activity and
use those funds. The largest project funded with 2018 CDBG funds which is still open is Quincy
Square with a current balance of: $286,591. Due to this large amount of funding not being able to be
drawn down in time for our timeliness check the PRC has proposed two options for use of these
funds.
Why did the Project Review Committee choose two options?
The Project Review Committee always creates contingency and back up plans in case the first priority
doesn’t work. Since it is so critical to have these funds awarded and spent down in a timely manner it
was important to have two options selected. The Project Review Committee (PRC) selected Priority
use 1 and Priority use 2 and they have built in important criteria that must be met by Priority use 1 in
order for the recipient/project to be eligible. If eligibility is not met, the funds still need to be awarded
in a timely manner so Priority use 2 will need to be selected.
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
PRIORITY 1:
The Kitsap Rescue Mission was selected for Priority 1 to install a sprinkler system in their building in
order to gain Occupancy for the building to be used as a shelter. The Project Review Committee
placed criteria which need to be met in order to be eligible to receive CDBG funds. These
requirements are Statutory requirements for the use of CDBG funds. The conditions are described in
the attached document under ‘Priority 1-Option.’ Here are the applicable Federal Regulations and
Statutes which must be met by all grantees:
24 CFR Part 6: Nondiscrimination in Programs and Activities receiving assistance under Title 1 of the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (which includes 24 CFR 6.5 Discrimination
prohibited-employment which states: A recipient may not, under any program or activity funded in
whole or in part with Federal Financial Assistance, subject a person to discrimination in the terms and
conditions of employment. Terms and conditions of employment include advertising, interviewing,
selection, promotion, demotion, transfer, recruitment and advertising, lay off or termination, pay or
other compensation, including benefits and selection for training.
Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (as implemented CDBG: 24
CFR 570.602): Which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, age,
religion and sex within Community Development Block Grant programs or activities. This includes
employment and beneficiaries of CDBG funded activities.
42 U.S.C. 5309: No person in the United States shall on the ground of race, color, national origin,
religion, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available in
this chapter (which includes the Community Development Block Grant).
Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964: All personnel actions affecting employees or applicants for
employment shall be made free from any discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national
origin.
Executive Order 11246: Equal Employment Opportunity: Contractors receiving funds under the
Community Development Block grant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
CPD Notice 04-01: Provides guidance regarding the CDBG grantees covered by the September 30,
2003 final rule on ensuring equal treatment of faith-based organizations in CPD programs: A faith-
based organization, like any other entity participating in a HUD funded program, must comply with all
the statutory requirements of that program. The CDBG and HOME programs contain statutory
provisions imposing nondiscrimination requirements on all grantees and their recipients and
subrecpients.
While the Kitsap Rescue Mission has stated in their Employee Handbook that they have a
Constitutional right to retain Religious preference in hiring, which may be true however the CDBG and
HOME Programs contain statutory provisions which impose certain nondiscrimination requirements
on all grantees (see above), which means hiring on the basis of religion is prohibited in these
programs.
The Kitsap Rescue Mission has requested an exemption to this under the Religious Freedom
Restoration Act. The City requested more information on this exemption from the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development on September 26, 2019. The request is currently being handled by
the Office of Community Planning and Development located at the Headquarters of the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (Robert C. Weaver Federal Building, 451 7th St SW
Washington DC, 20410). It is undetermined when we will receive guidance on this exemption. If the
Rescue Mission does receive an exemption and it occurs after the November 1st deadline, they will be
welcome to apply for CDBG funds in the future. Unfortunately, due to Federal requirements for
timeliness, we must have a plan in place immediately after this Public Hearing with expenditures
occurring very soon after contract execution. We simply cannot wait for an exemption which may or
may not happen.
It should be noted that the Kitsap Rescue Mission has indicated that they will not be revising their
hiring practices. Due to this, they will be ineligible to receive Federal funding at this time. The CDBG
program does fund other faith-based organizations. Staff is recommending that this option not be
selected because they are ineligible. Organizations that are funded have board approved non-
discrimination policies which include employment and they separate with time/location all faith-
based activities. Board approved non-discrimination documents for other faith-based organizations
funded with City of Bremerton CDBG funds can be provided by request from the CDBG Administrator.
PRIORITY 2
Project is to do necessary rehabilitation and repairs which include: lead based paint and asbestos (as
necessary) abatement, weatherization, security and required repairs to the shelter. The Project
Review Committee recommends that the YWCA contract with Kitsap Community Resources for
construction and project management. The YWCA has submitted their board-approved equal
employment opportunity policy which documents compliance with CDBG statutory non-
discrimination requirements.
Substantial amendment to 2018 Action Plan
Project Review Committee recommendation for 2018 funding
Priority 1-Option:
Reallocate ‘unused/at-risk’ funds from Quincy Square ($120,000) for Capital
Improvements to Kitsap Rescue Mission to help create an overnight shelter
facility that is in conformance with building and fire code.
Award Conditions:
Provided Kitsap Rescue Mission does the following:
1. Demonstrate conformance with HUD non-discrimination requirements documented in Federal
Statute 42 U.S.C. 5309, 24 CFR 6.5, Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974 (as implemented CDBG 24 CFR 570.602), and Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, which
includes policies that protect employees, volunteers and beneficiaries of the Kitsap Rescue
Mission.
*This shall be done with Kitsap Rescue Mission board approved action with notification to the
City no later than close of business on October 22nd. This also includes a commitment from
Kitsap Rescue Mission to publish the Nondiscrimination Policy on their website and
communicate that it is Kitsap Rescue Mission’s adopted policy.
All non-discrimination policies must run concurrently with the deed restriction recorded on the
property and all restricted use requirements can be found in the City of Bremerton 2020 Policy
Plan.
2. Kitsap Rescue Mission must meet milestones and timelines as delineated by the Mayor and City
staff on September 20, 2019.
Priority 2- Option:
Reallocate ‘unused/at-risk’ funds from Quincy Square ($120,000) for Capital
Improvements to YWCA shelter for lead based paint abatement and asbestos
(as necessary) abatement, weatherization, security and necessary repairs to the
shelter.
Award Conditions:
The committee encourages a partnership with Kitsap Community Resources for contract and project
management.
Ms. Embree-Russell,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided to Mayor Wheeler and the
Council Members for their review and consideration.
Due to the subject matter, a copy will also be shared with the CDBG Program Administrator to review,
and to include as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Andrea [mailto:drea2228@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 7:20 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Support Kitsap Rescue Mission
Hello.
My name is Andrea Embree-Russell. I am a Registered Nurse in Bremerton. I often care for men
and women who are homeless. There is a great need for the services (case management, day
room, education services, meals, safe harbor shelter for men and women, and clothing) provided
by the shelter. As a lifelong resident of Kitsap County, the continuing increase of homelessness
has been apparent over the years.
I hope support for Kitsap Rescue Mission will be a focus of the council. Thank you for your time
and consideration. The council does great work for the community.
Sincerely,
Andrea Embree-Russell, RN
360-204-1785
drea2228@gmail.com
Ms. Kincaid,
This is to acknowledge that your emails to both the City Council and Mayor Wheeler were received,
along with the attachment.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Beverly Kincaid [mailto:sound.grants@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 9:57 AM
To: Greg Wheeler <Greg.Wheeler@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Cc: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: FW: Sharing my concern/Rescue Mission
Hello Greg
I realized I should have sent you a copy of this message I sent to the Council last
night. I am sharing my concerns about the proposed transaction with the Rescue
Mission. I have some concerns, but also realize that if government funds are not spent
for religious activities, there may not be a problem in that regard. I would anticipate it
would be necessary for the BRM to set up a separate account for tracking use of the
proposed funds. I believe, as I mentioned in my message to the Council, that there are
a number of other options the mission could have pursued during nearly 4 years to
ensure that they had a save environment. Also, it appears to me that this is setting a
dangerous precedent for other nonprofits to pitch requests to the City for financial
assistance.
You know that I have often worked tirelessly to advocate for service and housing for our
local residents who are without homes. I believe in housing the most
vulnerable. among us. One only has to look at the efforts to situate tiny houses in Port
Orchard (that project has been in the works for close to 4 years) to know that the
solution is not any easy one. One option might be to offer matching funds after the
Mission raises a certain percentage of the needed funding for building safety.
Throwing money at the mission, with no strings attached, is not necessarily the
answer. One option might be to give the Mission a set length of time (Oct. 1 – Jan 1) to
raise matching funds, resulting in the city funding half and the Mission raising the other
half. Or perhaps a loan type of transaction. Times are changing, and with that change
comes more challenges. I hope you and the Council will arrive at the best possible
decision related to this project, but I do not support taking full funding from the Quincy
Square project to support this effort, but would be more supportive of placing some
burden on the Mission to raise matching funds by a date agreed on by both parties. A
loan agreement would be an even better option, with full payment due within a
year. For that matter, I wonder if the Mission has considered getting a bank loan for this
building safety project?
Kind regards,
Bev
From: Beverly Kincaid [mailto:sound.grants@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2019 8:53 PM
To: 'City Council'
Subject: Sharing my concern/Rescue Mission
Dear Council Members
Perhaps the Council has already made a decision on this matter. If so disregard my
comments. I wanted to share with you my concern about the city taking money from the
Quincy Square project to give to the Rescue Mission. Many of you know that I believe
in appropriate support of the needs of people who are homeless. I am alarmed the city
is willing to sign over funding in this manner. According to the news I read, the Rescue
Mission facility has been occupied for nearly 4 years. I cannot understand why in nearly
4 years’ time they have not been able to raise sufficient funding for completing the
projects that are essential for safe operation of a shelter. There are myriad resources
available, including foundation grants, county grants, private donors, donor-advised
funds, corporate support, small fee for service, to name a few. If the Council has
supported this transfer of funds, at a minimum the Council should have signed
assurance that people who are sheltered will not be required to participate in or be
subjected to religious activity as a condition for receiving secular services.
I am personally not in favor of setting this precedent. Which nonprofit will be the next
one to want to be bailed out? One must wonder how this Mission is going to continue
operating if for nearly 4 years they have been unable to raise enough money to take
care of urgent capital needs?
I am remain concerned about how the community can coalesce to address the needs of
those who have become homeless, but I am equally concerned about the role of religion
in this project, particularly if it involves the use of government funds.. How does the
Rescue Mission serve those who are not Christians, or who don’t want the love of Christ
or may be Muslim or Buddhist, or have no faith beliefs at all? Having worked in the past
as the regional grants manager for a large faith-based organization, I was proud of the
level of government funding Catholic Community Services (CCS) received both for
major capital projects and for general program operations. Those funds would not have
been made available to our organization if our programs or projects included any
religious overtones or proselytization.
It is true that our population of individuals who are homeless seems to be increasing at
an alarming rate, but the three points I am trying to make are: 1) Has the Mission
exhausted its efforts to reach out to the various other revenue streams I mentioned; 2)
Is it appropriate to transfer funds from an approved project that will benefit the entire
community?; and, 3) Should government funds be used for a facility in which religion
may be a condition for accessing secular services? One look at the Mission’s website
and mission statement seem to indicate that religion plays a significant role in this
organization and its activities:
Statement of Faith
We believe –
• The Bible to be the inspired, infallible, authoritative Word of God. (2 Timothy
3:15-17; 2 Peter 1:20-21)
• That there is one God, eternally existent in three persons: Father, Son and Holy
Spirit. (1 Timothy 3:16; Matthew 28:19; Ephesians 4:4-6; 1 Peter 1:2; Romans
8:14-17)
• In the deity and humanity of Christ, born of a virgin. His sinless life. His miracles.
His vicarious and atoning death through His shed blood. His bodily resurrection.
His ascension to the right hand of the Father. His present rule as Head of Church
and His personal return in power and glory. (Luke 1:30-35; John 1:14; 2
Corinthians. 5:21; 1 Corinthians 15:3-4)
• God created man and woman in His image for the purpose of worship, fellowship
and dominion of the physical realm. Male and Female He created them. (Genesis
1:26-28 )
• Each child is a gift of God and is given life at conception. (Psalm 139:13, 127:3;
Isaiah 44:2; Jeremiah 1:5; Luke 1:15,41; Galatians 1:15)
• That marriage is the union of one man and one woman that creates a bond for
the purpose of procreation, the care of their children, and being helpmates. (Gen
2:18,24; 1 Timothy 3:12)
• That for the salvation of a lost and sinful mankind, regeneration by the Holy Spirit
is absolutely essential. We are saved by grace through faith, not of works. That
the sinner who repents and personally accepts the finished work of Christ on the
cross becomes a child of God, is made a new creature, and is indwelt by the
Holy Spirit. (Ephesians 2:8-9; John 1:12, 3:36; 2 Corinthians 5:17; John 14:17;
Hebrews 9:11-14)
• In the present ministry of the Holy Spirit, by whose indwelling the Christian is
enabled to live a godly life.(John 14:17, 26; John 16:13-15; Romans 8:14-17)
• The Power of death is kept from those who put their trust in Christ...and that they
will dwell with Christ forever. (John 14:3, Rev. 20:6, 14, 15, 22:1-5)
• In the spiritual unity of believers in our Lord Jesus Christ, with equality across
racial, gender and class differences. (1 Corinthians 12:13; Ephesians 2:13-14)
They are currently looking for a new executive director and that position description also
illustrates that this group is quite immersed in religion. See attached recruitment
document,.
Kind regards,
Beverly Kincaid
360.509.3547
Kitsap Rescue Mission
Executive Director
Position Description
Position Summary
The Executive Director is responsible for the overall strategy and operations of the Kitsap Rescue
Mission (KRM) including planning and implementing long range goals, ensuring fiscal responsibility and
stewardship, and guaranteeing ongoing financial stability through the development and growth of a
sustainable pool of funding sources. The Executive Director will be a strategic, visionary and
collaborative leader who motivates and develops a team of employees and volunteers towards
excellence. Most importantly, because KRM is a Christian outreach, the Executive Director will be a
committed Christian who has demonstrated maturity in their faith and who believes in the redemptive
power of the Gospel of Grace through Jesus Christ. The Executive Director is the senior spiritual leader
of the mission.
Key Responsibilities
• Leadership and staff/volunteer development
o Develops, implements and monitors goals, objectives and operational plans for the Mission
that ensure ongoing excellence in the programs, staffing, administration, fundraising and
communications
o Leads, works collaboratively with, develops and evaluates mission employees.
o Builds a culture of team work
o Encourages employees to maximize their own productivity through the strategic and
purposeful management of volunteer resources
o Ensures that the mission meets all corporate responsibilities including insurance, corporate
filings, audits and annual reports
o Works in concert with the board in strategic planning and goal setting. Keeps the Board
informed on the condition of the organization and of internal/ external factors that impact the
mission in any significant way.
o The Executive Director will be committed to adhering to the policies and direction set by the
Board of Directors
• Fiscal Management/Stewardship
o Develops a yearly budget, closely monitors and adjusts as necessary
o Develops and implements a strategic well-rounded (planned giving, direct mail, major donors,
social media, events, etc.) fund development plan to guarantee stable, ongoing funding for the
mission
• Fund Development
o Serves as the chief fundraiser/spokesperson for the organization
o Partners with board members to develop, cultivate and honor all contributors including, major
donors, corporations, government agencies, churches and foundations.
o Ensure that donor intentions are honored and that accurate records are kept, and donations
are acknowledged in a timely manner.
• Community Relations
o Builds and maintains relations with elected officials, community leaders, other services
organization, churches and civic groups to increase organizational awareness and standing
Qualifications
o Minimum 5 years’ experience as a non-profit executive
o 4 year degree in social sciences, business, non-profit management, communications or related
field. Advance degree preferred
o Demonstrated ability to develop and implement fundraising strategies
o Strong nonprofit financial management skills
o Results oriented with strong follow through
o Strong communications skills including the ability to develop and deliver compelling
presentations
o Preferred: experience in capital campaign management
Required Personal Attributes and Values
o Must subscribe to the Kitsap Rescue Mission’s Statement of Faith and By-Laws
o Desire to serve the Lord Jesus Christ in the ministry of life recovery for those coming off the
streets, out of homelessness and out of addictions
o Possesses and demonstrates excellent personal integrity
o Demonstrates a Christ-like manner with guests, volunteers, co-workers, and internal and
external partners/agencies.
Mr. Enns,
This is to acknowledge that your email with (4) attachments was received, and will be provided to
Council Vice President Leslie Daugs as you indicated.
Due to the subject matter, a copy will also be shared with the remaining Council Members, Mayor
Wheeler, and the City’s CDBG Program Administrator for their review and information, and to include
your correspondence as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments. (By the way, I unfortunately could not open
your attachments, but I’ve kept them attached to this email just in case others can open them…)
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Bruce Enns [mailto:bruceenns14@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 3:59 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: letter to Leslie Daugs
Hi Leslie:
I just called Mountain View only to discover that you were not there this year. I'd like to see you
but, given my Parkinson’s I can't drive anymore, so I'll write you a little letter.
I read last week that you and the city council are involved in the difficult decision as to how and
where to spend your money with the homeless. Yes, of course I have an opinion. I spent the
entire year of 2018 volunteering at the Kitsap Rescue Mission on Tuesday and Thursday
mornings. There were wonderful people both on the staff and
the clientele that became good friends. I truly miss being there but, such is life when age sets in.
Leslie, please do not be affected by the "religious affiliation" clauses that now surround the
funding issue. These are great people and whatever proselytizing goes on is encouraged by the
clientele for personal growth and betterment. Nothing is forced or untoward. For example, my
contribution was primarily drawing many of the clients who wanted their "Picture". (see copies)
I know nothing about the YMCA mother's shelter which I am sure is also a great project, but The
mission is dear to my heart. Just give them an open ear is my request Leslie.
Bruce Enns (former coach)
Sent from my iPad
4 Attachments
Preview attachment image1.jpeg
image1.jpeg
502 KB
Preview attachment image2.jpeg
image2.jpeg
1.2 MB
Preview attachment image3.jpeg
image3.jpeg
605 KB
Preview attachment image4.jpeg
image4.jpeg
980 KB
Ms. Speare,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be shared with the Council Members for
their review and information.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Bjspeare [mailto:bjspeare@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2019 9:01 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Greg Wheeler
<Greg.Wheeler@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Rescue Mission Sprinkler System
Hello City Council,
As a property owner, resident, and volunteer in Bremerton - I request your support of spending Quincy
Jones funds to install a sprinkler system
in the Rescue Mission downtown.
It is important our community takes care of our vulnerable people and that we work to maintain and
create a downtown we can all enjoy together.
Mayor Wheelers proposal shows good leadership. I hope he has your support and we can move forward
as a community in a positive way to support our residents experiencing homelessness.
Kind Regards,
Jacquelyn Speare
Ms. Flores,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided to the Council Members and
Mayor Wheeler for their review and consideration.
Due to the subject matter, a copy will also be shared with the City’s CDBG Program Administrator for her
review and to include your correspondence as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Janet Flores [mailto:jntdflrs@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2019 3:31 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Housing for our homeless population
Thank you for your service and time to Bremerton and it's residents. Your time is valuable and I
appreciate your willingness to step up and serve ALL the people who choose to live here.
I am writing today to encourage you to continue the work of finding and funding, within reason,
shelters for those who find themselves without stable housing. This feat is not easy and money is
not always readily available. You have in your grasp money which would help rectify the current
option to meet fire codes - codes which are vital to keep in place in order to ensure the safety of
those who utilize the Kitsap Rescue Mission's current location. To ignore them would be
irresponsible. Although they are based in the belief of Jesus Christ and His eternal salvation for
all, this belief is vital, as well, in keeping their mission true to who they are and why they do
what they do - minister to the homeless population of our community.
If this money does not get placed into their care, I highly encourage your cooperation with this
organization to find new space for them to utilize in the interim in order to continue their work
for the least of our community. We in Bremerton are not on the same playing field of the federal
government, and it would benefit us all if we could allow ourselves a partnership with those who
have a proven track record at helping those who seek transition from homelessness to becoming
a working member of our society - no matter what their religious affiliation. When we are
allowed the opportunity to work and make things better for ourselves and our community, our
place of residence becomes a better and safer place to live.
Thank you again for your time and service to this community.
--
Janet Flores
Attn: Council Members (FYI)
From: Greg Wheeler
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 11:33 AM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Cc: jesse abrams <bassmintwrath@gmail.com>; James Burchett <James.Burchett@ci.bremerton.wa.us>;
Andrea Spencer <Andrea.Spencer@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Michael Six
<Michael.Six@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Roger Lubovich <Roger.Lubovich@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Re: Citizen Concern - Kitsap Rescue Mission (Jesse Abrams)
Good morning Jesse,
Thank you for taking the time to email the with your concerns. I briefed the City Council last
night that myself and City of Bremerton (COB) staff were working with the Kitsap Rescue
Mission (KRM) to help get their building up to fire code. The KRM building is not out of
compliance based on a technicality, it is out of compliance due to it missing basic life safety
components, mainly a sprinkler system and proper ways to evacuate in a fire. The ability of the
building to withstand an earthquake is also seriously in question. This is a dangerous building as
it now stands and we (COB & KRM staff) need to make some very serious decisions by Oct 13th
to determine it’s future use. We are all hoping KRM will be successful in applying for funds to
help with the required improvements. There will be more to come on that front.
To answer your question about the police being heavy handed on people with negative
credibility, I can assure you they only address the behaviors they personally observe or have
reported to them. Everyone has the right to be treated with respect and the Bremerton Police
Department takes this approach very seriously. Hopefully this helps answer your questions and
addresses your concerns. If you have more questions or concerns please don’t hesitate to contact
me. I hope you have a nice day.
Greg Wheeler
Mayor
City of Bremerton
(360) 473-5266
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:29 PM, City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us> wrote:
Mr. Abrams,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be shared with the Council Members and.
Due to the subject matter of your question, I have also provided a copy of your email to Mayor Wheeler
and Police Chief James Burchett.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your concerns.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: jesse abrams [mailto:bassmintwrath@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 5:14 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: request for consideration
I am not a employee of the Kitsap Rescue Mission, However they provide a service to myself
and to 40 or 50 other people. We are losing the overnight shelter. The Shelter from the Salvation
Army opens in December. The KRM needs a new sprinkler system. This is a problem as we
whom are affected drag our personal effects through the streets to the same places like Salvation
Army. Do you believe that the police may be heavy handed on people with negative credibility. I
hope you look into this and respond.
Mr. Wilson,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided to Mayor Wheeler and the
Council Members for their review and consideration.
Due to the subject matter, a copy will also be shared with the CDBG Program Administrator to review,
and to include as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments and to express your concerns.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: josh wilson [mailto:jawil87@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 2:00 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Kitsap rescue mission
I implore you all to keep funding and permitting running and current for the Kitsap rescue
mission. It helps all types of people, children, elderly, families. It helps the community to
maintain it's humanity. Societies willingness to help those who need it demonstrates the
direction in which it's moral compass points. Please, do not let those who wish to pervert
morality prevail.
Keep the mission open.
Ms. Siebens,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be shared with the Council Members for
their review and information.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: kim siebens [mailto:kimmysiebens@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2019 3:52 AM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Greg Wheeler
<Greg.Wheeler@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Kitsapcommissioners@co.kitsap.wa.us;
councilmembers@cityofportorchard.us; rputaansuu@cityofportorchard.us;
councilmembers@cityofpoulsbo.com; berickson@cityofpoulsbo.com; council@bainbridgewa.gov;
kmedina@bainbridgewa.gov; emily.randall@leg.wa.gov
Subject: Keeping Kitsap Rescue Mission's over night shelter open will save lives
Dear Community Leaders,
Thank You Bremerton Mayor, Greg Wheeler and Bremerton City Council Members for
offering to discuss assisting the Kitsap Rescue Mission in keeping their overnight
homeless shelter open. I am so glad to hear you are going to add this discussion to your
Sept. 25 Study Session Meeting.
I am calling on other cities in Kitsap County to reach out and help as well. The people
who utilize KRM are not all from Bremerton. I meet people who come over on the ferry
from Port Orchard or who take the bus from Bainbridge Island and Poulsbo. This is an
entire county issue. I hope we all start helping one another. If other cities choose not to
maintain a homeless shelter, let us support the one and only in Bremerton.
I have been a RN for over 13 years and work in Seattle at a leading hospital. I have
worked for over a decade with the indigent population and have seen conditions
become dire in Seattle. I am the founder of the local community group, Bremerton
Homeless Community Coalition. I am also the founder of the local non profit, Their
Voice, where we assist homeless pet owners. I could spend my spare time doing
hobbies I love or even working overtime to earn more money. I choose to spend my
“spare time” helping the local homeless community for free. By helping them we can
prevent even worse conditions from occurring.
Understanding the homeless crisis is very complex and can be incredibly frustrating.I
understand you have many other responsibilities and this is merely one of them that you
are having to face as a city leader. There are some very basic things we can do to help.
By helping to keep the Kitsap Rescue Mission doors open you will be making a very
important first step.
KRM is the only year round shelter in Kitsap County and therefore very important in
getting people connected to resources that can help address some of their complex
issues and get them off of the streets. When people are living on the streets they cost
more financially and utilize resources that could be used in more appropriate ways. This
is putting an unbelievable burden on our police and emergency response workers, our
local health care facilities, local businesses, property owners, and other housed
citizens.
We cannot ignore the homeless or become so scared or disgusted with them that they
disappear. Instead try and look at them as people in crisis, people who are often sick
(physically, mentally, emotionally) and also just people who cannot find affordable
housing. This is an issue that will take some thoughtful interventions and time to sort
out. I urge you to assist the Kitsap Rescue Mission to Keep their doors open at night.
People will die without their services. That is guaranteed.
Over the past few years I have seen many success stories come from KRM. People
that, without their help, would have died in tragic and preventable ways or caused much
more trouble to themselves and the city. I have been able to meet people who use KRM
resources and assist them into more permanent housing such as housing provided by
the local non profit, Eagles Wings Coordinated Care. You should all pay attention and
visit this particular non profit as they have been able to get dozens of previously
homeless individuals, off the streets of Kitsap County. KRM has acted as a starting
point to getting many of these people into these supportive, clean and sober, managed
housing environments.
They understand that the housing first model works. There are many scholarly research
articles that can help explain this. I will use one example from a 2009 JAMA article
titled, Health Care and Public Service Use and Costs Before and After Provision of
Housing for Chronically Homeless Persons with Severe Alcohol Problems
(https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/183666). In this study, people
who were homeless with severe alcohol problems and chronic users of health and
criminal justice services were assisted into housing. Prior to being housed these
individuals were shown to cost approx $4066 per person per month to their community.
Costs were incurred from such things as: jail bookings, days incarcerated, shelter and
sobering center use, hospital-based medical services, publicly funded alcohol and drug
detoxification and treatment, emergency medical services, and Medicaid-funded
services.After 12 months in stable housing these same people were down to costing an
average of $958 per month.
There are many more studies out there that come to this same conclusion. Unhoused
people just cost more money and take away from public services that could be used in
much more efficient ways.
You don’t need to be a bleeding heart or humanitarian to want to help people.
Supporting KRM and local non profits who are providing valuable services can help
decrease the cities financial burden and allow a more efficient allocation of our local
resources.
Thank you for your time and service,
Kimmy Siebens
President, Their Voice
http://www.their-voice.org
Founder, Bremerton Homeless Community Coalition
https://www.facebook.com/groups/410116102775715/
Ms. Hammes and Ms. Wilmot on behalf of Kitsap Movement Builders,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided with the Council Members for
their review and consideration.
Due to the subject matter, a copy will also be shared with Mayor Wheeler for his information, and with
CDBG Program Administrator to be included as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your support for the Kitsap Rescue Mission.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Sonja Hammes [mailto:sonja.hammes@outlook.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2019 4:23 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: In support of Kitsap Rescue Mission
Dear Bremerton City Council Members,
We are the Kitsap Movement Builders. We are the union members of UFCW Local 21 who work in
your grocery stores, hospitals and healthcare facilities of Kitsap County. We have partnered together
across sectors, to address issues that commonly affect us in our workplaces and communities.
When we came together last year we discussed our workplace issues and decided that homelessness and
substance addiction are common problems that we all face. Everyday, we see the struggles of our
homeless neighbors. Our stores and hospitals have become default shelters for people who have nowhere
else to go. With increasing rents, we also have colleagues and family members who face housing
insecurity, which is making many in our community vulnerable. This problem will only be compounded
with no overnight shelter.
As a group we decided to see what we can do to address this and to help. We researched and initially
made a monetary contribution to the Bremerton Homeless Community Coalition. Next, just last month,
we sponsored one their monthly picnics alongside Kitsap Rescue Mission at Evergreen Park. Both
groups, who mostly come from the communities they serve, are doing wonderful work in respectfully
meeting some of the basic needs of our vulnerable population. While we served the picnic food we met so
many people -young and old, men and women, healthy and ill. Every single one of them was gracious
and appreciative of the small bit of help we offered. They all deserve a place to call home. We also know
that people have a significantly higher chance of getting and keeping a job if they have a place to sleep.
With winter approaching, Kitsap County needs to have a place for anyone to go for respite and sleep
and needed support in their struggle to live in these economic times. We grocery and healthcare workers
see it every day. We know and recognize that every person in our community is worthy and deserves
dignity.
We the undersigned Kitsap Movement Builders fully support the proposal to fund Kitsap Rescue
Mission and keep it open overnight throughout the year. We also want to work with you, the Bremerton
Homeless Community Coalition, Kitsap Rescue Mission and other concerned community organizations to
expand the support for those who need housing through more temporary, transitional and permanent
housing to enable everyone in our county to thrive. We will be watching this process and look forward to
a positive resolution.
Sincerely,
The Kitsap Movement Builders
-Sonja Hammes, PharmD, BCPS
Harrison Medical Center
1610 Park Ave, Apt E2, Bremerton WA, 98337
206-218-5875
-Susan Wilmot - Safeway Checker, Executive Board Vice President UFCW Local 21
Ms. Sandstrom,
This is to acknowledge your follow-up email, which will also be provided to the Council Members, Mayor
Wheeler, and Ms. Achaoui. This includes your offer for each of them to visit the Kitsap Rescue Mission,
as well as your call for blankets, sleeping bags, and back packs.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
BTW, we very urgently need blankets, sleeping bags and back packs.
From: Marcia Sandstrom [mailto:marciasandstrom@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 5:11 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Kitsap Rescue Mission
Dear Council,
Today, Thursday, was my volunteer day at the Mission. The homeless who came to the day room are
showing signs stress regarding where they will be overnight, especially since the nights are getting so
cold. Please help them.
Perhaps you don't know, the volunteers at the Mission far out number the paid staff. Even the Board of
Directors are volunteer. The Mission has a very low employee expense for as many people as we
serve. The day room can have well over 100 during cold weather. We would house many more than 26
over night if allowed by building codes. In other words, we need renovations. This building is a perfect
location as we are in the same block as The Salvation Army. We work closely together. They serve
meals and we encourage "loitering". In other words, we have a welcoming space for them to stay
during the day. We have coffee, water, snacks, movies, we know their names and we listen to
them. We give out clothing Monday, Wednesday and Friday afternoons. Each guest gets 10 free items a
week and they get to shop in our "store".
Please come visit and see our people and how much the volunteers love them.
BTW, we very urgently need blankets, sleeping bags and back packs.
Sincerely,
Marcia Sandstrom
From: Lori Smith On Behalf Of City Council
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 10:53 AM
To: Marcia Sandstrom <marciasandstrom@yahoo.com>
Cc: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Greg Wheeler
<Greg.Wheeler@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Sarah Achaoui <Sarah.Achaoui@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: RE: Citizen Support - Kitsap Rescue Mission (Marcia Sandstrom)
Ms. Sandstrom,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided to the Council Members,
Mayor Wheeler, and the City’s CDBG Program Administrator for their review and information, and to
include your correspondence as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments; and for your service to the community.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Marcia Sandstrom [mailto:marciasandstrom@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 4:43 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Kitsap Rescue Mission
Please step in and save the mission. The staff and volunteers are wonderful and caring. The people who
criticize are not volunteering any of their time to help our homeless.
I volunteer time and money at the mission. This is a fantastic organization and a true asset to the
community. I love our homeless. Please come in a visit us, I'm there on Thursday mornings.
Marcia Sandstrom
Ms. Sandstrom,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided to the Council Members,
Mayor Wheeler, and the City’s CDBG Program Administrator for their review and information, and to
include your correspondence as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments; and for your service to the community.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Marcia Sandstrom [mailto:marciasandstrom@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 4:43 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Kitsap Rescue Mission
Please step in and save the mission. The staff and volunteers are wonderful and caring. The people who
criticize are not volunteering any of their time to help our homeless.
I volunteer time and money at the mission. This is a fantastic organization and a true asset to the
community. I love our homeless. Please come in a visit us, I'm there on Thursday mornings.
Marcia Sandstrom
Ms. Sandstrom,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be shared with the Council Members and
Mayor Wheeler for their review and information.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Marcia Sandstrom [mailto:marciasandstrom@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2019 7:53 AM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Kitsap Rescue Mission
Please keep our overnight homeless shelter open.
Even increase capacity, if there is enough money.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Rochon,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided to the Council Members and
Mayor Wheeler for review and information.
Due to the subject matter, a copy will also be shared with the City’s CDBG Program Administrator for her
review and to include your correspondence as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Karen Rochon [mailto:kjrochon40@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 12:54 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Kitsap Rescue Mission
To Mayor Greg Wheeler and members of the City Council,
We would like to voice our full support to awarding the Kitsap Rescue Mission the federal
grant money, that you originally offered to assist them in meeting code requirements, in order to
keep their overnight shelter open.
They offer a vital service to our community. They are mainly run by volunteers. Hiring
requirements should be left up to their discretion, we believe, and should be exempt from federal
restrictions. They are a faith based organization at their core, not a church, and do not
discriminate whom they serve. All are welcome.
Please give them the support they need to stay open and serve our vulnerable homeless
community.
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Mr. and Mrs. Andrew Rochon
Kingston, WA
Good afternoon Shu,
This is the perfect time to email me your input since the 30 day public comment period began
today. I am forwarding your comments to city staff and the City Council for their consideration
also. Please let everyone in your network know that now is the time to provide comments and
what everyone says really does matter. Take care and have a great evening!
Sincerely,
Greg Wheeler
Mayor
City of Bremerton
(360) 473-5266
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 25, 2019, at 3:59 PM, Shu Latif <shulatif@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi I have some concern about finding the homeless Shelter. I just found out it is religious based
and maybe they turn away members of the lgbtq community or force trans people into dorm
areas for the wrong gender. I’m all for helping our only homeless housing in the area, it is an
emergency. But can we force them to stop discriminating if they want the money? It seems if this
is our tax payers money, they need to provide the service to all members of our community and
not just the ones they like.
Shu
Attn: Council Members (FYI)
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Wheeler
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 11:49 AM
To: Thira Delacey <thiramarie84@gmail.com>
Cc: James Burchett <James.Burchett@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Randy Plumb
<Randy.Plumb@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Tom Wolfe <Tom.Wolfe@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Andrea Spencer
<Andrea.Spencer@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Michael Six <Michael.Six@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; City Council
<City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Re: Concerns on rescue mission.
Good morning Thira,
Thank you for taking the time to email me with your concerns and provide very valuable insight! I am
aware of the issues in your neighborhood and every negative consequence you bring forward is
something I am very concerned about. If the Kitsap Rescue Mission is successful in correcting very
serious life safety deficiencies in their building and is allowed to continue operating an overnight shelter,
they will need to address their part of the issues you bring forward. I am including several officials from
the City of Bremerton in my reply for their consideration and input. I really do appreciate you taking the
time to alert me to your concerns and I appreciate your commitment to our beautiful city. We must as a
city address the issues you highlight if we are to continue to move forward as a desirable place to live.
Take care and I hope you have a great day!
Greg Wheeler
Mayor
City of Bremerton
(360) 473-5266
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 8:06 PM, Thira Delacey <thiramarie84@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Mayor Wheeler,
>
> I am writing in concerns of the location of the Rescue Mission shelter. I live at 619 park ave with my 5
kids with the shelter in our back yard. We absolutely love our home. However, we have seen fights daily,
people going to the bathroom a long our fences, a drug overdose on our property, drug deals and more.
This is a daily thing. I do believe a shelter is needed but the location is very concerning as there are many
children on this block.
> We had asked our landlord for a fence, in which I feel he should not have had to pay for, but it was
needed to keep the homeless out. Both ours and the neighbors house had the basement doors kicked
in. We have found needles in our garden.
> My kids are ages 2,6,8,10 and 16.
> The rescue mission does not do background which means sex offenders can stay there or harden
criminals.
> I want to feel safe.
> As I said, I do believe in homeless shelters and support them. I also believe in the safety of kids.
> I love our country very much. I was born and raised here in Kitsap. I see a lot of good things coming to
Bremerton but the drugs and the things I see in the back yard are very sad. Please consider our concerns
for the safety of our kids and our house.
> Thank you for your time.
> Thira Rayfield
Ms. Nicks,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided to the Council Members and
Mayor Wheeler for their review and consideration.
Due to the subject matter, a copy will also be shared with the CDBG Program Administrator to review,
and include as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments and to express your concerns.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: Tricia Nicks [mailto:tricianicks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 9:18 AM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Concerns re: Closing of Kitsap Rescue Mission
Good morning,
I am writing because of the concerns I have for the people of Kitsap who are without housing and the
potential for closing of the Kitsap Rescue Mission. I am not the most knowledgeable about all the work
and details and specific numbers of our community members that will be affected by this closing, but
from what I understand the mission is filled to capacity often, and if it closes, there are no alternatives.
I certainly trust that if the building has been deemed unsafe that it is true. I also trust in my local
government to do what is right for our community, in this case it sounds like fix it and/or provide
alternative accommodation. Incredibly simplistic, but frankly, that is what I expect.
Should there be ways as a community member that I can help - I’m willing to do so as well as recruit my
fellow nurses at Harrison. Please do what is within your power to not have these people suffer on the
streets. It is our civic responsibility to provide the basic needs of shelter for them. It is what I expect
from living in the State of Washington, it is what makes me proud to live here.
I volunteer with Kitsap Harvest. A program that picks unwanted fruit from trees and distributed to our
community members in need. It is a program from Washington State University Extension Program. We
focus on the issues of both food waste and food insecurity. We utilize food from trees and also items of
surplus in personal gardens. We issue these foods to food banks, soup kitchens, assisted living, shelters
and other access points. I’m a gleaner, have gone out and picked the fruit that is then sorted and
distributed.
I volunteer as Secretary for StandUp for kids - Kitsap. We are a local chapter of a national organization
that provides assistance to homeless and at-risk youth within Kitsap. We provide 1200 meal packs
monthly to 31 different locations within Kitsap where the counselors distribute to kids for weekend
food. Weekdays they have the school food program and we provide snacks. As a 100% volunteer non-
profit, we are doing what we can to assist these young people in getting education and jobs to become
working members of our community. It’s what they want! Our main focus is food - but we also provide
hygiene, clothing, back to school and assistance over the holidays. We give them a paper bag of cereal,
bread, peanut butter and jam so they have something to eat. Some kids age out of foster care at 18 and
we provide aid until they turn 25. These kids will be affected by the closure of KRS.
I am a nurse at Harrison Silverdale. I have been a nurse for 26 years. I’m extremely pumped about
the growth and merger between Bremerton and Silverdale campus where we will be able to serve our
community members safely during their final transition of care - to discharge within the community. I
am working with UFCW21 and my hospital to address concerns regarding discharge of patients focusing
on a clothing closet. But hoping to dive into the issue of ready for discharge, but no place to go.
Anecdotally, a patient was discharged - sent in a cab to a storage facility. Nurses don’t want to do that,
nor do case managers or social workers. We need to help them provide a safe plan for discharge. I come
from Canada where again, anecdotally, we would have patients ready for discharge that we couldn’t
because of housing and it being 30 degrees below 0. Just because weather here is livable, doesn’t mean
that people don’t need a safe place to go.
I want to work with the system to help. It’s not a quick fix, or people smarter than I would have done it
already. It’s a process. Please find a way to keep KRS open and/or provide alternate housing.
I am trying. I ask you to do the same.
Cheers,
Tricia Nicks
Manitoban, Texas x 12 years, Nurse 26 yrs, Proudly live in Poulsbo-Washington with my husband & 3
dogs for 6 years
Mr. Duckarmen,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided to Mayor Wheeler and the
Council Members for their review and consideration.
Due to the subject matter, a copy will also be shared with the CDBG Program Administrator to review,
and to include as a part of the record.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your comments and to express your concerns.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Victor Duckarmenn [mailto:duckster1@centurylink.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 2:32 PM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: Bremerton Rescue Mission Grant
City Council Office mailto: City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
Mailing: 345 6th St., Suite 100
Bremerton, WA 98337
Ph: 360-473-5280
To: Whom It May Concern
Subject: Grant
I have volunteered at the mission for two years with over 125 hours working with the
homeless. This rescue mission needs to continue assisting local residents and citizens
find jobs, acquire phones, acquire housing, find a place where this can be facilitated on
a weekly basis. Both the mission and Salvation Army facilities need the assistance to
support our citizens to become economically viable and become productive people
again. Your support has become vital to ensure these voters, Americans get the
necessary help to lift themselves out of the cycle they find themselves in. The folks
there at the mission running dailyassistance are the most dedicated citizens with the
welfare of local peoples quality of life.
Please support this faith based operation as many people depend on the missions on
going success.
Thank you
Victor Duckarmen
405-664-8239
USAF Retired
From:Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
To:City Council; Greg Wheeler
Cc:Sarah Achaoui
Subject:Citizen Concern - Kitsap Rescue Mission (Charles Ely)
Date:Monday, September 23, 2019 5:13:06 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
Attn: Council Members and Mayor Wheeler
A voicemail was left at the Council Office from Charles Ely, (360) 405-0685 to express his support for
the Kitsap Rescue Mission, which he states provides a vital service.
Thanks, Lori
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From:Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
To:Sarah Achaoui
Subject:FW: Citizen Concern - Kitsap Rescue Mission (Jona Reynolds)
Date:Monday, September 30, 2019 11:31:48 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
Sarah, I forgot to “cc” you on this one…
From: Lori Smith On Behalf Of City Council
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2019 11:08 AM
To: Jona Reynolds <jonalreynolds@gmail.com>
Cc: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>; Greg Wheeler
<Greg.Wheeler@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: RE: Citizen Concern - Kitsap Rescue Mission (Jona Reynolds)
Ms. Reynolds,
This is to acknowledge that your email was received, and will be provided to the Council Members
for their review and information.
Due to the subject matter, a copy was also shared with Mayor Wheeler for his consideration.
Thank you for taking the time to submit your suggestion.
Lori Smith
Legislative Office Manager
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473-5280
City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us
www.BremertonWA.gov
From: Jona Reynolds [mailto:jonalreynolds@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2019 9:26 AM
To: City Council <City.Council@ci.bremerton.wa.us>
Subject: mission
If you decide to back making improvements to the mission, would it be possible to move the
entrance to the mission to the backside to make that sidewalk more desirable to walk.
Jona Reynolds
2018 Substantial
Amendment to the
Community Development
Block Grant Annual Action
Plan
November 6th 2019
Sarah Achaoui,
CDBG Administrator
24 CFR 570.902 Review to determine if
CDBG-funded activities are being carried
out in a timely manner
Sixty days prior to the end of the grantee’s current program year, the
amount of entitlement grant funds available to the recipient under grant
agreements but undisbursed by the U.S. Treasury cannot be more than 1.5
times the entitlement grant amount for its current program year.
In early September staff ran the test and determined that we needed to
spend down at least: $118,913 (To bring the ratio from 1.75 to 1.5).
Administration determined that we needed to do a “substantial
amendment” to reallocate $120,000 to a grantee that can spend the
funding quickly.
Substantial amendments
as defined by 2019 Policy Plan adopted by Bremerton
City Council on March 16, 2018 (resolution number 3307).
The Policy Plan required that the Project Review Committee (PRC) meet
and develop and alternate funding plan for a substantial amendment.
There were no grant applications that were unfunded from 2018 so the PRC
reviewed current applicants for 2020 funding and developed a
recommendation for them to receive the 2018 funds.
The following are two options for 2018 funding are:
Priority 1: Kitsap Rescue Mission-Shelter Improvements
Priority 2: YWCA -Improvements to ALIVE Shelter
Priority 1:
If a 2018 Substantial Amendment is awarded as follows: Reallocate
‘unused/at-risk’ funds from Quincy Square ($120,000) for Capital
improvements to Kitsap Rescue Mission to help create an overnight shelter
facility that is in conformance with building and Fire code.
Award Conditions: Kitsap Rescue Mission must:
Demonstrate conformance with HUD non-discrimination requirements
documented in Federal Statute 42 U.S.C. 5309, Section 109 of the Housing and
Community Development (HCD) Act of 1974 (as implemented in 570.602), and 24
CFR Part 6,
Which states: “No applicant can deny an individual an opportunity to participate in a
program or activity as an employee” and which includes policies that protect
employees, volunteers, and beneficiaries of the Kitsap Rescue Mission.
This shall be done with Kitsap Rescue Mission board approved action with
notification to the City, which also includes a commitment from Kitsap Rescue
Mission to publish the nondiscrimination policy on their website and
communicate that it is Kitsap Rescue Mission’s adopted policy.
Federal Regulations and Statutes regarding
non-discrimination required to be followed
for use of CDBG Funds:
42 U.S.C. 5309: No person in the United States shall on the ground of race, color, national origin, religion, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available under this chapter includes Community Development Block Grant.
Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (as implemented CDBG: 24 CFR: 570.602: Prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, age, religion and sex within Community Development Block Grant programs or activities. This includes employment and beneficiaries of CDBG funded activities.
24 CFR Part 6 Nondiscrimination in Programs and Activities receiving assistance under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (includes 6.5 -Discrimination prohibited –employment): A recipient may not, under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Federal Financial Assistance, subject a person to discrimination in the terms and conditions of employment. Terms and conditions of employment include advertising, interviewing, selection, promotion, demotion, transfer, recruitment and advertising, layoff or termination, pay or other compensation, including benefits and selection for training.
Federal Regulations and Statutes required
to be followed for use of CDBG Funds
(cont.):
Executive Order 11246: Equal Employment Opportunity: Contractor will not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because
of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national
origin.
CPD Notice 04-01: provides guidance regarding the CDBG grantees
covered by the September 30, 2003 final rule on ensuring equal treatment
of faith-based organizations in CPD programs: A faith-based organization,
like any other entity participating in a HUD funded program, must comply
with all the statutory requirements of that program. The CDBG and HOME
programs contain statutory provisions imposing nondiscrimination
requirements on all grantees and their recipients and subrecipients
On September 25th the Kitsap Rescue Mission requested from the City an
exemption to meeting the Statutory requirements of the CDBG program
under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
On September 26th 2019 the City contacted the U.S. Department of Housing
And Urban Development Region 10 office of Regional Counsel and Office
of Community Planning and Development to request additional guidance
on an Exemption under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
This request could not be handled in the Seattle Regional Office but was
forwarded by Region 10 to HUD Headquarters in Washington D.C. The
request is now being handled by the Office of Community Planning and
Development and Office of General Counsel in HUD Headquarters in
Washington D.C.
Due to the timeliness issue, the City cannot wait while a determination is
made by HUD and therefore staff recommends that Kitsap Rescue Mission
not receive funding at this time. If a determination is made in the
affirmative, the Rescue Mission is welcome to apply for CDBG funds in the
future, unfortunately timing will not work for 2018 funding
Priority 2:
Reallocate ‘unused/at-risk’ funds from Quincy Square ($120,000) for Capital
Improvements to the YWCA Shelter for lead based paint abatement and
asbestos (as necessary) abatement, weatherization, security and necessary
repairs to the shelter.
YWCA is immediately ready to go under contract and work will begin
immediately after.
Council to provide guidance at study
session:
Council Direction for Public Hearing on November 6th:
Fund Kitsap Rescue Mission or YWCA?
Amend Agenda Bill and motion to reflect which option the City Council selects
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Public Hearing on a Resolution approving
the 2020 Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) and HOME Funding
Recommendations for inclusion in the 2020
CDBG/HOME Action Plan
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: DCD-CDBG
Presenter: Sarah Achaoui
Phone: (360) 473-5375
SUMMARY: On March 20, 2019, City Council approved the 2020 CDBG/HOME Policy plan outlining
the CDBG and HOME funding allocation process. Based on that policy, the Project Review
Committee has developed the 2020 funding recommendations for Council consideration and
approval. If approved, these submissions will be sent to the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) in the City’s 2020 Annual Action Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution, with Exhibit A* – 2020 Action Plan Project Review Committee (PRC)
recommendation for 2020 funding
*NOTE: The funding recommendations from the PRC for 2020 is dependent on the
amendments to the 2018 Action Plan (revising the $120,000 of the grant awards),
which is currently under review by the City Council. The reader will see in Exhibit A
that there are some varying grant awards (with notes about Priority 1 and Priority 2)
for a couple of the grantees – this is because the PRC presented the City Council with
two priorities for the 2018 amendment. After the study session on October 23, 2019
Exhibit A will be revised to reflect the priority option that City Council is moving
forward to Public Hearing on November 6. In other words, after the study session on
October 23rd Exhibit A will be revised to show only one grant award amount for each
agency.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None. Block Grant is pass-through funding from
the Department of Housing and Urban Development and these recommended sub-recipient grants
are paid 100% through the City’s CDBG and HOME grants. Administrative costs associated with the
program, most of which are covered by the HUD entitlement, are approved in the Policy Plan and in
the City’s budget process.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ Limited Presentation ☒ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☒ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Resolution No. ________ approving the 2020 funding recommendations to be included
in the 2020 Action Plan to HUD; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with
substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A9
1
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, approving the 2020 CDBG/HOME
Funding Recommendations for inclusion in the 2020 CDBG/HOME
Action Plan.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton is an entitlement community which receives a
Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) each year from the Department of Housing
and Urban Development (“HUD”), and also receives funding from HUD’s Home Investment
Partnerships (“HOME”) program through its participation in the Kitsap County HOME
Consortium; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has established a mandatory Policy Plan for
the City’s management of its HUD entitlement, including a citizen participation plan, application
and review processes, eligibility, and implementation requirements for grant funded projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton conducts a competitive annual process based
on the Policy Plan to determine allocation of CDBG and HOME entitlement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton’s 2020 Policy Plan citizen participation plan
establishes a Project Review Committee to assist the Department of Community Development in
reviewing CDBG and HOME applications by interviewing applicants and recommending annual
project allocation decisions to the Bremerton City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton participates in a Coordinated Application
process with Kitsap County Block Grant Program and Kitsap County Housing and Homelessness
Program for HOME and Homeless Housing Grant Programs, and had its own competitive CDBG
RFP process which received six (6) capital applications, and two (2) job training applications,
and all were forwarded to the Project Review Committee; and
WHEREAS, the CDBG Project Review Committee has reviewed, interviewed
and discussed each of the eligible funding requests and formulated funding recommendations
and a funding contingency plan based on their review; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton Block Grant staff on Wednesday, September
24th 2019, posted the recommendations to the City of Bremerton’s website and advertised in the
Kitsap Sun a 30-day written public comment period commencing September 24th and
concluding October 26th, 2019; and
WHEREAS, no public comments were received during the public comment
period; and
2
WHEREAS, a legal ad was placed in the Kitsap Sun on September 25th, 2019
advertising the City of Bremerton Public Hearing adopting the funding recommendations on
November 6th 2019; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development CDBG/HOME staff
presents the Project Review Committee’s recommendations to the City Council for adoption;
NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The recitals and findings of fact set forth in this resolution are
hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. The 2020 CDBG/HOME Funding Recommendations attached
hereto as Exhibit A will be incorporated into the 2020 Action Plan to be submitted to the
Department of Housing and Urban Development for approval.
SECTION 3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences
of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and
effect.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this _____
day of __________________, 2019.
_________________________________
ERIC YOUNGER, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________ ________________________________
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk
City of Bremerton Public Works & Utilities Curb Ramp Construction and Sidewalk Replacement and Repair
Kitsap Mental Health Services-Pendleton Place $295,986
Community Frameworks-Downpayment Assistance $68,920
Funds will be used for acquisition of land, architectural and engineering costs, and building permit fees for the development for 9-units,
three (3) townhouse style triplexes. Each triplex will have two 2-bedroom units and one 3-bedroom unit. One of the 2-bedroom units in
each triplex will be one level, ADA accessible, and available for a veteran. The units will be available for households at or below 30% of
area median income, prioritizing based on the Housing Solutions Center vulnerability assessment. Rental assistance will be provided
through Section 8 vouchers.
Funds requested will be used for the construction of a 70-unit permanent supportive and affordable housing facility for residents of
Kitsap County, 18 and older, experiencing chronic homelessness and living with persistet mental illness, substance use disorders and/or
other disabling conditions. The complex will consist of 35 studios, 35 1 bedroom, common space (including 2 respite beds), and office
space for onsite housing staff and visiting service providers. Rental assistance will be provided through Project Based Vouchers for 56-
units and McKinney funds, through BHA for 14-units.
Funds will be used for Down Payment Assistance (DPA) and administrative costs of the Bremerton Homeownership program. The
program will pair HOME funds with internal and lender-partner funds to provide up to 20$ DPA and closing cost assistance to program-
qualified, mortgage-ready homebuyers at or below 80% Area Median Income purchasing an eligible home in the Bremerton City limits.
Homebuyer education and Individual Pre-Purchase Counseling is required for all participants. When possible, Community Frameworks
will undertake "Acquisition, Rehab, Resale" activities focusing on health and safety improvements, with a sweat equity and volunteer
labor component.
This project would build on the ADA accessible infrastructure in the CDBG target Area from 2019 by constructing an additional 12 curb
ramps and approximately 500 lineal feet of new sidewalk. This project, if funded, will improve walkability for pedestrians of all ages and
abilities, remove barriers for those with disabilities, and provide connected corridors for foot traffic within the target area. If funded
under Priority 2: the funded portion is to be completing the Evergreen Rotary Park walkway connector sidewalk.
Priority 1: $0 Priority 2: $56,000
YWCA Kitsap County-Emergency Shelter Improvements Priority 1: $159,000 Priority 2: $103,000
Necessary rehabilitation and repairs to include: lead based paint and asbestos (as necessary) abatement, weatherization, security and
required repairs to the shelter. The Project Review Committee recommends that the YWCA contract with Kitsap Community Resources
for construction and project management.
Kitsap Community Resources-Weatherization and Minor Home Repair Priority 1: $25,000 Priority 2: $25,000
Funds will be used to install weatherization measures such as insultation of attics, walls, floors and heating ducts. Priority air sealing and
blower door driven air sealing, installation of ventilation and minor home repairs such as roofing, plumbing and electrical necessary to
ensure the preservation of these measures as well as health and safety improvements, including grab bars and wheelchair ramps.
Kitsap Community Resources (KCR)- Manette Housing $159,193
HOME Funding Recommendations
Capital OR Microenterprise Applications
Kitsap Community Resources-Business Education Support and Training $75,000
The BE$T micro-enterprise program is designed specifically for low-income individuals and those with limited funds, who are interested
in mastering the skills necessary to start and/or expand their own business. Grant funding will allow affordable tuition and access to all.
2020 goals for Bremerton residents include 32 businesses to be assisted and 27 new jobs to be created. BE$T is offered four times per
year and isdelivered in four phases:
1. Phase 1: The 2.5 hour "Business Workshop and Orientation"
2. The eight-week 20-hour basic business training class
3. A six-session development & planning program over 90 days
4. Advanced support groups that meet twice per month
CDBG PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE 2020 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Project Descriptions
Exhibit A
Project Name
Job Training Applications (Public Services)-subject to 15% cap $60,000 capped
Coffee Oasis-HOPE Inc.
HOPE Inc Job Training Program provides a comprehensive plan for preparing and equipping street and homeless youth ages 16-25 years
old for employment opportunities in the community. Every job training internship comprises of:
1. 6 weeks of business classes (e.g. interview skills, resume writing, work ethics)
2. On the job training at a local business in the community for 100 hours
3. Aftercare support in acquiring permanent employment.
Funding Contingency for CDBG: If allocation is higher, the increase is awarded to YWCA. If lower, reduce the KCR weatherization award. (Under Priority
1)
(Under Priority 2: If allocation is higher, fund City of Bremerton Public Works to increased amount. If less, decrease amount to City of Bremerton
Public Works)
2020 Community Development Block Grant
Project Review Committee Recommendations for 2020 Funding
November 6, 2019
Description of Funding Sources
Community Development Block Grant
program is a flexible program which
provides communities with resources to
address a wide range of unique
community development needs.
Beginning in 1974 and funded under
Title 1 of the Housing and Community
Development Act, the CDBG program is
one of the longest continuously run
programs at HUD.
The City of Bremerton as an Entitlement
Community receives an annual formula
allocation.
2020 Funds
Estimated 2020 Entitlement: $400,000
Total:$400,000
2020 Available for Grant Administration:
(20% of entitlement)$80,000
Amount Available for funding: $320,000
Project Review Committee •Made up of a combination of City Staff (3), Community Volunteers (3), City Council representative (1), and Planning Commissioner (1).
•The Role of the Project Review Committee established in the 2020 Policy Plan is to review, score, and interview applicants.
•Project Review Committee members make funding recommendations to the City Council who ultimately makes the final funding recommendation to the Federal Funding Agency: the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
•Established by 2020 CDBG
Policy Plan
•Resolution Number 3317
•Passed March 20, 2019
Funding Priorities Set By Council and Consolidated Plan
Consolidated Planning Priorities:
•Creating Economic Opportunities
•Providing decent Affordable Housing
•Creating suitable living environments (removing architectural barriers)
•Support Affordable Housing (HOME Priority)
City Council Priorities:
•Capital Projects in the Target Area Projects will focus on affordable housing, weatherization and minor home repair, or projects which create or support suitable living environments.
•City-wide job training programs Including Public Service Programs and Microenterprise programs (microenterprise will not be subject to the 15% public service cap).
•Determined by Council
during planning session
March, 2019
•A public comment period
was also held where no
comments were received
on the funding priorities
Admin Costs
Administration is 20% of estimated entitlement award: $80,000
Recommended Projects
Project Review Committee Funding Recommendations
Coffee OasisHOPE Inc. Job Training-$60,000
•HOPE Inc. Job Training Program connects homeless youth ages 16-25 with job training opportunities at Coffee Oasis businesses and with partners for 100-150 hour internships.
•Program will create employment within the City of Bremerton by equipping youth with the skills and support network necessary to acquire employment where they live.
•Recommended amount for funding: $67,500
•Projected outcomes for 2020:
•35 youth participate in Job Preparation Classes
•25 youth participate in a Job Training Internship
•Goal to have18 youth acquire employment within 6 months of participating in the program
CDBG-JOB TRAINING (15%
CAP)
Kitsap Community ResourcesBusiness Education Support and Training-$75,000
•The BE$T Micro-enterprise program is designed specifically for low-
income individuals and those with limited funds, who are interested in
mastering the skills necessary to start and expand their own business.
•Funds will allow for comprehensive entrepreneurial training for low-
income individuals seeking self-sufficency through entrepreneurship.
•BE$T's primary target population are the unemployed,
underemployed, individuals with disabilities, senior citizens, veterans,
minorities, refugees and immigrants. A sub-set of this population
includes the difficult-to-place employee who may struggle with health
issues, age discrimination, addiction recovery, and/or criminal history.
A secondary target are the existing small business owners in the
community who are struggling and need basic business training and
coaching to become a stable and sustainable business.
•Estimated number of businesses to be assisted: 32
•FTE Jobs Created: 11
•FTE Jobs Retained: 6
CDBG-
MICROENTERPRISE
Capital Projects in the Target Area
Kitsap Community ResourcesWeatherization and Minor Home Repair-$25,000
•Funds will be used to assist low and moderate income
Bremerton residents with weatherization and minor
home repairs. This will include installing measures
which improve energy efficiency such as insulation,
blower door testing to assess heat leakage, ductless heat
pumps and combustion safety evaluation.
•It will also include minor home repairs that may include
repair or replacement of a leaking roof, improvements
that increase accessibility such as wheelchair ramps, as
well as health and safety improvements such as
repairing wiring and plumbing.
•These funds are available to both renters and home-
owners City-wide. Funds will be used for contractor
labor and materials, program staff wages & benefits,
and support costs for the Weatherization Program.
•Recommended amount for funding: $25,000
•Approximately 2 homes will receive assistance in the target zone
Weatherization and
Minor Home Repair
2018 Substantial Amendments impact the 2020
funding strategy.
Priority 1: (Kitsap Rescue Mission)
YWCA: $159,000
City of Bremerton Public Works: $0
Priority 2: (YWCA Shelter)
YWCA: $103,000
City of Bremerton Public Works: $56,000
CDBG CAPITALAffordable Housing
YWCA Improvements to ALIVE Shelter
•YWCA Kitsap County is the only State certified provider of emergency shelter, housing and support services for victims of domestic violence in Kitsap County.
•YWCA Kitsap County owns and operates a 13-bed emergency communal living shelter for families fleeing domestic violence.
•The emergency shelter, opened in 1978 is in need of necessary repairs.
•Necessary repairs include:
•Lead Based Paint abatement
•Privacy improvements
•Security upgrades
•Replacement of Windows for energy efficiency and safety improvements
•Roof and gutter repair
•Project review committee has recommended the YWCA partner with KCR for expertise and ability to leverage work
Priority 1: $159,000
Priority 2: $103,000
City of Bremerton Public Works ADA Improvements
•Funds will be used to improve
dangerous sidewalks and
provide curb ramps where none
currently exist
•Priority of work will be
completing the walkway on
Park Drive
•Plan will work to implement
the City’s ADA Transition Plan
•Project will be carried out by
City staff for more cost
efficiency
CDBG CAPITAL
Priority 1: $0 Priority 2: $56,000
HOME Projects
Kitsap Community Resources-ManetteHousing-$159,193
•Funds will be used for acquisition of
land, architectural and engineering
costs, and building fees for the
development for 9-units, three (3)
townhouse style triplexes. Each triplex
will have two 2-bedroom units and one
3-bedroom unit. One of the 2-bedroom
units in each triplex will be one level,
ADA accessible, and available for a
veteran. The units will be available for
households at or below 30% of area
median income, prioritizing based on
the Housing Solutions Center
vulnerability assessment. Rental
assistance will be provided through
Section 8 vouchers.
HOME FUNDS
Kitsap Mental Health Services-Pendleton Place-$295,986
•Funds requested will be used for the
construction of a 70-unit permanent
supportive and affordable housing facility
for residents of Kitsap County, 18 and older,
experiencing chronic homelessness and
living with persistent mental illness,
substance use disorders and/or other
disabling conditions.
•The complex will consist of 35 studios, 35 1
bedroom, common space (including 2 respite
beds), and office space for onsite housing
staff and visiting service providers.
•Rental assistance will be provided through
Project Based Vouchers for 56-units and
McKinney funds, through BHA for 14-units.
HOME FUNDS
Community Frameworks-Down Payment Assistance-$68,920
•Funds will be used for Down Payment
Assistance (DPA) and administrative costs
of the Bremerton Homeownership program.
The program will pair HOME funds with
internal and lender-partner funds to provide
up to 20% DPA and closing cost assistance
to program-qualified, mortgage-ready
homebuyers at or below 80% Area Median
Income purchasing an eligible home in the
Bremerton City limits.
•Homebuyer education and Individual Pre-
Purchase Counseling is required for all
participants. When possible, Community
Frameworks will undertake “Acquisition,
Rehab, Resale” activities focusing on health
and safety improvements, with a sweat
equity and volunteer labor component.
HOME FUNDS
Council to provide guidance at study session:
•To amend Public Hearing documents for 11/6:
Selection of Priority 1 or Priority 2 in the 2018 Substantial Amendment.
Amend Exhibit A of the Resolution to reflect funding strategy that matches the 2018 Substantial Amendment
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Proposed Public Hearing on Revenue
Sources for the Proposed FY-2020 City of
Bremerton Budget
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: Financial Services
Presenter: Mike Riley and
Caroline Tompson
Phone: (360) 473-5303
SUMMARY: Tonight’s public hearing is to take comments on the revenue sources for the 2020
Proposed Budget. The proposed budget anticipates property levy increases of the full 1% allowed by
law. The EMS levy is being set at .50 cents per $1000 of Assessed Valuation in anticipation of
pending ballot measure. Utility tax rates remain unchanged. The proposed budget also adjusts for
the annual $20,000 increase to the B&O tax exemption rate plus an additional $20,000 increase to
the exemption, incorporates utility rate increases and includes interfund transfers between funds
where appropriate. Overall, the revenue projections throughout all funds remain conservative.
ATTACHMENTS:
The 2020 Proposed Budget may be found on the City’s website at www.bremertonwa.gov.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
Total proposed general fund revenue, without beginning fund balance, is $45,955,262.
With beginning fund balance, total general fund revenue is $57,058,229.
Total proposed revenue city wide, without beginning fund balance, is $128,738,080.
With beginning fund balance, total revenue city wide is $180,874,553.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ Limited Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☒ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Open Hearing for Public Comment
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A10
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Ordinance amending and re-establishing
City Rates & Fees for 2020
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: All
Presenter: Mike Riley
Phone: (360) 473-5303
SUMMARY: Each year, as part of the budget process, the various City departments review their
charges, rates and fees for services and make recommendations on any changes needed. The
attached included recommended changes to fees charged by the various departments.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. ______; and 2) Exhibit A
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Impacts to revenues are dependent on the
demand for services. The 2020 proposed budget does anticipate the approval of the ordinance and
related rate tables.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ Limited Presentation ☒ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Ordinance No. ____ amending and re-establishing City Rates and Fees for 2020.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A11
Page 1 of 2
2020 Rates & Fees
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending and reestablishing rates and fees
for services established in Ordinance No. 5357 relating to Animal
Control, Bremerton Kitsap Access Television (“BKAT”),
Department of Community Development, Department of Financial
Services, Fire Department, Gold Mountain Golf Course, Ivy Green
Cemetery, Kitsap Conference Center, Municipal Court, Parking,
Parks and Recreation Department, Police Department, Public
Records, Department of Public Works and Utilities, Tax & License,
Telecommunications and other related services.
WHEREAS, the City Council, by this ordinance, desires to amend and reestablish
the rates and fees established in Ordinance No. 5357; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Rate Tables Amended and Reestablished. The rates and fees
relating to Animal Control, Bremerton Kitsap Access Television (“BKAT”), Department of
Community Development, Department of Financial Services, Fire Department, Gold Mountain
Golf Course, Ivy Green Cemetery, Kitsap Conference Center, Municipal Court, Parking, Parks
and Recreation Department, Police Department, Public Records, Department of Public Works
and Utilities, Tax & License, and Telecommunications, and other related services, as set forth in
Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 5357, are hereby amended and reestablished in their entirety as set
forth in the attached Exhibit A of this ordinance, said exhibit is incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. Rate Tables - Effective Date. The amendment and
reestablishment of rate tables as set forth in Section 1 above shall be effective January 1, 2020.
SECTION 3. Corrections. The City Clerk and codifiers of this ordinance are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the
correction of scrivener, clerical, typographical, and spelling errors, references, ordinance
numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force
ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
Page 2 of 2
2020 Rates & Fees
PASSED by the City Council the___________ day of November, 2019.
_________________________________
ERIC YOUNGER, Council President
Approved this ________ day of November, 2019.
_________________________________
GREG WHEELER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ ________________________________
ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the ________ day of ______________________, 2019.
EFFECTIVE the ________ day of ______________________, 2019.
ORDINANCE NO. ________.
R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Legal\2020 Rates and Fees Ordinance.docx
2019 RATES & FEES2020
RATES & FEES
City of Bremerton
Ordinance No. ____5357
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Rate Table Page
ANIMAL CONTROL ........................................................................................... 1
BREMERTON KITSAP ACCESS TELEVISION (BKAT) ............................................. 2
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .............................................. 43
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES ............................................................ 1211
FIRE DEPARTMENT ........................................................................................... 1312
GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE ..................................................................... 1514
IVY GREEN CEMETERY ...................................................................................... 1615
KITSAP CONFERENCE CENTER .......................................................................... 1716
MUNICIPAL COURT .......................................................................................... 1817
PARKING .......................................................................................................... 1918
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ............................................................... 20
POLICE DEPARTMENT ...................................................................................... 25
PUBLIC RECORDS ............................................................................................. 26
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES ................................................. 27
TAX & LICENSE ................................................................................................. 28
TELECOMMUNICATIONS .................................................................................. 29
202019 Rates & Fees 1 | Page
TABLE A ANIMAL CONTROL FEES
1. Licenses for Dogs and Cats
a) For Each Cat Spayed or Neutered (Upon Proof of Spaying or Neutering)
− Annual $7.50
− Lifetime $25.00
b) For Each Dog Spayed or Neutered (Upon Proof of Spaying or Neutering)
− Annual $12.50
− Lifetime $45.00
c) For Each Cat Not Spayed or Neutered $37.50
d) For Each Dog Not Spayed or Neutered $37.50
e) Senior Citizen Permanent Dog/Cat $12.50
f) Replacement Tag $1.00
g) Additional License Fee (for late renewal) $10.00
2. License for Chickens
a) Annually up to five (5) chickens $12.50
b) Senior permanent for up to five (5) chickens $12.50
3. Impound and Redemption Fees - Domestic Animals
a) Impound $45.00
b) Vaccination $45.00
c) Boarding (per day) $20.00
d) Medical care Case dependent
e) Microchip $30.00
4. Impound and Redemption Fees - Livestock
a) Impound $60.00
b) Boarding (per day) $40.00
c) Medical care Case dependent
d) Special Transportation fee $120.00
2 | Page
TABLE B BREMERTON KITSAP ACCESS TELEVISION (BKAT)
1. PRE-PRODUCTION
a) Equipment Consultation $100105.00/ hour
b) Program Development $100105.00/hour
c) Research $100105.00/hour
d) Location $100105.00/hour
e) Scripting $100105.00/hour
f) Graphics Development $100105.00/hour
2. PRODUCTION*
a) Set-up $100105.00/hour
b) Production $100105.00/hour
c) Breakdown $100105.00/hour
*minimum of 2 hours for any productions
3. POST PRODUCTION
a) Edit $100105.00/hour
b) Voice Over $100105.00/hour
4. TRAINING
a) Studio - 3 hours of camera and director training – max 4 people $100.00No Charge
b) Edit – First 3 hours of Apple Final Cut No Charge
Additional 5 hours of Apple Final Cut $50.00
5. MISCELLANEOUS
a) Equipment Installation $100/hour
b) Equipment Troubleshooting and Repair $100/hour
c)a) DVD Duplication (includes tax) $35.84
b) Studio rental for non-members -with all equipment
(must be certified with crew training- min 2 hours) $25 /hour $105/hour
BKAT Staff as crew Additional $105/hour
6. MEMBERSHIP (ANNUAL)
a) Individual Resident (within Kitsap County) $25.00
b) Individual Non-Resident $50.00
c) Organization – Resident (within Kitsap County) $75.00
d) Organization – Non-Resident $150.00
7. PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT
BKAT will produce a PSA with or without voiceover. The public service announcement will air on
BKAT for a minimum of two weeks. Client receives a digital copy for their own purposes.
$100.00105.00/hour
202019 Rates & Fees 3 | Page
TABLE C DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1. CODE ENFORCEMENT
a) ABATEMENTS
− Dangerous Building $900 + Direct Service and Supply Cost
− Garbage & Weed $640 + Direct Service and Supply Cost
b) ABANDONED PROPERTY FINES & PENALTIES
− Failure to Register $1,000 + $100 per day
− Failure to Inspect, Maintain, and/or Secure $1,000 + $100 per day
c) RENTAL PROPERTY REGISTRATION FINES & PENALTIES
− Failure to Register and File a Declaration of Compliance as Required
$1,000 + $100 per day
− Failure to Obtain a Certificate of Inspection When Required
$1,000 + $100 per day
2. PLANNING
a) SUBDIVISIONS
− Preliminary Short $1000 + $150/lot
− Preliminary Formal Plat/Binding Site Plan $2500 (base) + per lot
• 1-100 lots $150/lot
• 101-200 lots $100/lot
• 201 + lots $75/lot
− Final Short $630 + $40/lot
− Final Formal Plat/Binding Site Plan $945 + 40/lot
− Minor Amendment $630 (no lot fee)
− Extension $630 (no lot fee)
b) SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM
− Substantial Development Permit $1300
− Conditional Use Permit – Type II $850
− Conditional Use Permit – Type III $1750
− Shoreline Variance $1750
− Permit Revision $325
− Shoreline Exemption $100
c) STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
− Checklist $320
− Environmental Impact Statement Review/Adoption $650 +
additional cost of expertise
4 | Page
d) PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE $100
e) ZONING ORDINANCE
− Ordinance Amendments
• Text $740
• Rezone (Map Amendment) $740
− Variance
• Administrative $325
• Public Hearing/Single Family $500
• Public Hearing/Other $1750
− Development Agreements $1600
− Conditional Use Permit
• Single Family Residential Type II $350
• Single Family Residential Type III $500
• Commercial / Non-Residential / Multifamily – Type II $850
• Commercial / Non-Residential / Multifamily – Type III $1750
− Non-Conforming Use Determination $275
− Director’s Code Interpretation $175
f) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
− Text or Map Amendment $1500
− Combined Text and Map Amendment $2500
g) MULTIFAMILY TAX EXEMPTION
− Application $1500
h) DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
− Conceptual Design Conference $500
− Design Response Conference $500
i) CRITICAL AREA REVIEW Hourly Rate
(Dangerous trees, tree removal in sloped area, etc.)
j) FORESTRY Hourly Rate
Conversion Harvest Option Plan
3. MISCELLANEOUS FEES
a) APPEAL (to Hearing Examiner) $350
b) Hourly Rate $73.00
c) Technology Surcharge on Permits 5% of Permit Fee
(Permit Surcharge Levied on Fees Noted with *)
d) Third-Party Technical Review and Verification Actual Cost
(Geotechnical Evaluation, Habitat Review, Structural Engineering Review, Etc.)
202019 Rates & Fees 5 | Page
4. SITE DEVELOPMENT
a) SITE PLAN REVIEW
− Commercial / Non-Residential / Multifamily – Type II $1,000
b) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT* $1,000
c) GRADING PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW FEES* Refer to Exhibit 4
5. BUILDING
a) CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY $73.00
b) BUILDING PERMIT FEES* Refer to Exhibit 1
c) BUILDING PLAN REVIEW FEE 65% of the building permit fee as set forth in Exhibit 1
d) ESTABLISHED “BASIC” PLAN REVIEW 50% of Plan Review Fee
Pursuant to DCD policy
e) BUILDING PERMIT FEE FOR REROOF* $100
f) MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES*
− Residential Refer to Exhibit 2
− Commercial / Non-Residential / Multifamily Valuation and Refer to Exhibit 1
g) PLUMBING PERMIT FEES*
− Residential Refer to Exhibit 3
− Commercial / Non-Residential / Multifamily Valuation and Refer to Exhibit 1
h) Stop Work Fee 100% of permit fee
6 | Page
EXHIBIT 1
BUILDING AND OTHER PERMIT FEES
TOTAL VALUATION1 FEE
$1.00 TO $500.00 $35.00
$501.00 TO $2,000.00 $35.00 for the first $500.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $100.00, or
fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $40,000 $80.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $11.00 for each additional $1,000.00,
or fraction thereof, to and including $40,000
$40,001.00 to $100,000.00 $498.00 for the first $40,000; plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00,
or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,038.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $7.00 for each additional
$1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,838.00for the first $500,000.00 plus $5.00 for each additional
$1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00
$1,000,001.00 to 5,000,000.00 $6,338.00 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional
$1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to include $5,000,000.00
$5,000,001.00 and over $18,338.00 for the first $5,000,000.00; plus $1.00 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
Other Inspections and fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours (minimum
charge – two hours)
Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
2. Re-inspection fees assessed under provisions of this
chapter shall be as follows (per inspection):
Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated
(minimum charge – one-half hour)
Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or
revisions to plans (minimum charge – one-half hour)
Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
5. For use of outside consultants for plan checking and
inspections, or both
Actual Costs 2
6. Manufactured Home Setup Fee Foundation Bid Price valuation used in Exhibit 1
7. Moved Building Permit Fee (not including other
required permits)
$100.00
8. Demolition permit Fee: 3 cents per square foot, with a
minimum charge of
$100.00
9. Energy Code Plan Review Surcharge for New Single
Family Residences
$50.00
1 Valuation includes fair market value of labor and materials.
2 Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
202019 Rates & Fees 7 | Page
EXHIBIT 2
MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance and Heaters Fee
1. For the issuance of each mechanical permit $25.00
2. For issuing each supplemental permit for which the original permit has not expired, been
canceled or finaled $7.25
Unit Fee Schedule (Note: The following do not include permit-issuing fee)
1. Furnaces
For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner,
including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100,000 Btu/h
(29.3 kW) $14.80
For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner,
including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h (29.3 kW) $18.20
For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including vent $14.80
For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor-
mounted unit heater $14.80
2. Appliance Vents
For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not
included in an appliance permit $7.25
3. Repairs or Additions
For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit,
cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption or evaporative cooling
system, including installation of controls regulated by the Mechanical Code $13.70
4. Boilers, Compressors and Absorption Systems
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including 3
horsepower (10.6 kW), or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h (29.3 kW) $14.70
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over three horsepower (10.6
kW) to and including 15 horsepower (52.7 kW), or each absorption system over 100,000
Btu/h (29.3 kW) to and including 500,000 Btu/h (146.6 kW) $27.15
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower (52.7
kW) to and including 30 horsepower (105.5 kW), or each absorption system over 500,000
Btu/h (146.6 kW) to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h (293.1 kW) $37.20
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower (105.5
kW) to and including 50 horsepower (176 kW), or each absorption system over 1,000,000
Btu/h (293.1 kW) to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h (512.9 kW) $55.45
For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 50 horsepower (176
kW), or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h (512.9 kW) $92.65
5. Air Handlers
8 | Page
For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute (cfm) (4719 L/s),
including ducts attached thereto
Note: This fee does not apply to an air-handling unit which is a portion of a factory-
assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit
is required elsewhere in the Mechanical Code $10.65
For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm (4719 :s) $18.10
6. Evaporative Coolers
For each evaporative cooler other than portable type $10.65
7. Ventilation and Exhaust
For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct $7.25
For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system
authorized by a permit $10.65
For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the ducts
for such hood $10.65
8. Incinerators
For the installation or relocation of each domestic-type incinerator $18.20
For the installation or relocation of each commercial or industrial-type incinerator $14.50
9. Miscellaneous
For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by the Mechanical Code but not classed
in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in the table $10.65
For each gas piping system $10.00
Other Inspections and Fees
Inspections outside of normal business hours, per
hour (minimum charge – two hours Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
Re-inspection fees assessed under provisions of this
chapter shall be as follows (per inspection): Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated,
per hour (minimum charge – one-half hour) Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
Additional plan review required by changes,
additions or revisions to plans or to plans for which
an initial review has been completed (minimum
charge – one-half hour) Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
202019 Rates & Fees 9 | Page
EXHIBIT 3
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance
1. For issuing each permit $25.00
2. For issuing each supplemental permit $10.00
Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to items 1 and 2 above)
1. For each plumbing fixture on one trap or a set of fixtures on one trap (including
water, drainage piping and backflow protection therefore) $7.00
2. For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer $15.00
3. Rainwater systems – per drain (inside building) $7.00
4. For each cesspool (where permitted) $25.00
5. For each private sewage disposal system $40.00
6. For each water heater and/or vent $7.00
7. For each gas piping system $10.00
8. For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent,
except kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps $7.00
9. For each installation, alteration or repair of water piping and/or water treating
equipment, each $7.00
10. For each repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture $7.00
11. For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter including backflow protection
devices therefore $7.00
12. For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in item 12:
1 to 5 $5.00
Over 5, each $1.00
13. For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric type vacuum
breakers:
2 inch (51 mm) diameter and smaller $7.00
Over 2 inch (51 mm) diameter $15.00
14. For each graywater system $40.00
15. For initial installation and testing for a reclaimed water system $30.001
16. For each annual cross-connection testing of a reclaimed water system (excluding
initial test ) $30.001
17. For each medical gas piping system serving one to five inlet(s)/outlet(s) for a
specific gas $50.00
18. For each additional medical gas inlet(s)/outlet(s) $5.00
Other Inspections and Fees
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours Hourly rate per Rate Table C –
Miscellaneous Fees
2. Re-inspection fee Hourly rate per Rate Table C –
Miscellaneous Fees
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated Hourly rate per Rate Table C –
Miscellaneous Fees
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions
to approved plans (minimum charge – one-half hour)
Hourly rate per Rate Table C –
Miscellaneous Fees
10 | Page
EXHIBIT 4
GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES
50 cubic yards (38.2 m3) or less No fee
51 to 100 cubic yards (40 m3 to 76.5 m3) $23.50
101 to 1,000 cubic yards (77.2 m3 to 764.6 m3) $37.00
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m3 to 7645.5 m3) $49.25
10,001 100,000 cubic yards (7646.3 m3 to 76,455 m3) $49.25 for the first 10,000 cubic yards
(7645.5 m3), plus $24.50 for each
additional 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5
m3) or fraction thereof
100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards (76,456 m3 to 152,911 m3) $269.75 for the first 100,000 cubic yards
(76,455 m3), plus $13.25 for each
additional 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5
m3) or fraction thereof
200,001 cubic yards (152,912 m3) or more $402.25 for the first 200,000 cubic yards
(152,911 m3), plus $7.25 for each
additional 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5
m3) or fraction thereof
Other Fees:
Additional plan review required by changes, additions or
revisions to approved plans (minimum charge – one-half
hour)
Hourly rate per Rate Table C –
Miscellaneous Fees
GRADING PERMIT FEES1
50 cubic yards (38.2 m3) or less $23.50
51 to 100 cubic yards (40 m3 to 76.5 m3) $37.00
101 to 1,000 cubic yards (77.2 m3 to 764.6 m3) $37.00 for the first 100 cubic yards (76.5 m3)
plus $17.50 for each additional 100 cubic
yards (76.5 m3) or fraction thereof
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards (765.3 m3 to 7645.5 m3) $194.50 for the first 1,000 cubic yards
(764.6 m3), plus $14.50 for each additional
1,000 cubic yards (764.6 m3) or fraction
thereof
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards (7646.3 m3 to 76,455 m3) $325.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards (7645.5
m3), plus $66.00 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards (7645.5 m3) or fraction thereof
100,001 cubic yards (76,456 m3) or more $919.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards (76,455
m3), plus $36.50 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards (7645.5 m3) or fraction thereof
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours
(minimum charge – two hours) Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
2. Re-inspection fees assessed under provisions
of this chapter shall be as follows (per
inspection): Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically
indicated (minimum charge – one-half hour) Hourly rate per Rate Table C – Miscellaneous Fees
1The fee for a grading permit authorizing additional work to that under a valid permit shall be the difference between the fee paid
for the original permit and the fee shown for the entire project.
202019 Rates & Fees 11 | Page
TABLE D DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
1. CHECK HANDLING FEE $40.00
2. PASSPORT ACCEPTANCE FEE U.S. Department of State Fee Chart
12 | Page
TABLE E FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. REGULATORY LICENSE FEES
a) BMC 9.48 Fireworks Stands / Displays $100/stand/year
b) BMC 9.48.020(9) Cash Bond
− Fireworks Stand Clean-Up (refundable) $50/stand/year
− Citywide Fireworks Clean-up Fee (non-refundable) $50/stand/year
c) BMC 18.06
− Ambulance Services $75.00/vehicle
− Ambulance Inspections $75.00/vehicle
2. AMBULANCE TRANSPORT FEE
a) ALS—1 $791.00
b) ALS – 2 $884.00
c) BLSE $620.00
d) Mileage $16.80/mile
e) Itemized EMS Fees (one charge per transport)
− ECG $70.00
− IV/10 $50.00
− O2 $50.00
− SPO2 $15.00
− CSPINE $40.00
− End Tidal CO2 $30.00
− C-PAP $175.00
3. EMS SERVICE CALL TO ASSISTED LIVING, LONG TERM CARE AND ADULT CARE FACILITIES
$100 After first response per quarter
4. RE-INSPECTION FEE $73.00
5. HAZARD MATERIALS RESPONSE
a) Rice Hull Ash Actual Cost per Bag
b) Absorbent Pads Actual Cost per Bag
6. STAND-BY-TIME
a) Fire Engine w/Crew of 2 $155.001 + $150.00 = $305.00/hour
b) Fire Engine w/Crew of 3 $155.001 + $225.00 = $380.00/hour
c) Fire Engine w/Crew of 4 $155.001 + $300.00 = $455.00/hour
7. ACTIVE FIREFIGHTING
a) Fire Engine Washington Fire Chiefs Published Rate1
b) Aerial Ladder Washington Fire Chiefs Published Rate1
1Washington Fire Chiefs Association Wage & Equipment Rates for the Washington State Fire Service
8. FIRE WATCH $75.00/hour
9. AFTER HOURS INSPECTION $75.00/hour – 2 hour Minimum
202019 Rates & Fees 13 | Page
10. RUSH PLAN REVIEW $500.00 plus Standard Fees
11. OPERATIONAL PERMIT $100.00
12. FIRE SAFETY OFFICERS $75.00/hour – 2 hour minimum
13. FALSE FIRE ALARM $200.00
14 | Page
TABLE F GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE
1. CASCADE COURSE (prices do not include sales tax)
a) Friday 18 Holes $45.00
b) Weekday 18 Holes (Mon-Thurs) $40.00
c) Weekend/Holiday 18 Holes (Note: 1) $50.00
d) Weekday 9 Holes (Mon-Thurs) $28.0030.00
e) Weekend/Holiday 9 Holes $30.0032.00
f) Continuation Fee $25.00
g) Twilight Weekday (Mon-Thurs) $28.0030.00
h) Twilight Weekend/Holiday $32.00
i) League Rate (Not Sat, Sun or Holiday) $23.0024.00
j) Junior 18 Holes (Mon-Thurs) $17.0018.00
k) Junior Twilight Weekend/Holiday $17.0018.00
l) 36 Hole Special (Mon-Thurs) $90.00
m) 36 Hole Special (Fri-Sun) $110.00
n) Senior Punch Card (Not Sat, Sun or Holiday) (Note: 2) $250.00280.00
n)o) Regular 10 Round Punch Card $320.00
o)p) Junior 10 Round Punch Card $120.00130.00
p)q) Low Income Sr. Punch Card (Not Sat, Sun or Holiday) (Note: 2 & 3) $120.00130.00
q)r) Daily Private Cart $18.00
r)s) Shotgun Tournament (Not To Exceed 18 Hole Green Fee) $85.00
2. OLYMPIC COURSE (prices do not include sales tax)
a) Friday 18 Holes $72.00
b) Weekday 18 Holes (Mon-Thurs) $60.00
c) Weekend/Holiday 18 Holes (Note: 1) $82.00
d) Weekday 9 Holes (Mon-Thurs) $35.0036.00
e) Weekend/Holiday 9 Holes $45.0046.00
f) Continuation Fee $35.00
g) Twilight Weekday (Mon-Thurs) $35.0036.00
h) Twilight Weekend/Holiday $45.0046.00
i) League Rate (Not Sat, Sun or Holiday) $23.0024.00
j) Junior 18 Holes (Mon-Thurs) $25.0028.00
k) Junior Twilight Weekend/Holiday $25.0028.00
l) 36 Hole Special (Mon-Thurs) $90.00
m) 36 Hole Special (Fri-Sun) $110.00
n) Shotgun Tournament (Not To Exceed 18 Hole Green Fee) $120.00
o) Olympic Punch card plus $30.00
p) Annual Pass Single $2,200.002,500.00
q) Annual Pass Couple $3,400.003,800.00
r) Annual Pass Family $3,400.003,800.00
s) Annual Pass Junior (Mon-Thurs) $500.00700.00
1. Saturday, Sunday or Holiday (May-September Not to Exceed Rate)
May be used for twilight any day of the week including holidays.
3.2. Ages 62 & up with household income < $18,000.
202019 Rates & Fees 15 | Page
TABLE G IVY GREEN CEMETERY
1. GRAVE SITES
a) Adult $1,435.001,464.00
b) Infant (Not in Infant Sections) $1,464.001,435.00
c) Infant Section $366.00359.00
d) Veteran $850.00836.00
e) Perpetual Care (collected at time of site sale) 10% of site fee
2. LINERS (Subject to sales tax)
a) Casket Liner $874.00979.00
b) Cremation Liner $215.00240.00
c) Infant Liner $359.00400.00
d) Oversized Liner $1,172.001,313.00
3. OPENING AND CLOSING
a) Casket $836.00853.00
b) Cremation $300.00306.00
c) Infant $586.00598.00
d) Veteran $502.00512.00
4. DISINTERNMENT
a) Adult $1,794.001,830.00
b) Infant $1,794.001,830.00
c) Urn $287.00293.00
d) Removal (only) $1,185.001,209.00
5. MARKER SETTING FEES
a) Setting Fee $193.00250.00
6. GRAVE SIDE SERVICES
a) Chairs & Awning $256.00260.00
7. MARKERS (Subject to sales tax)
a) Markers Value based on size and type of marker
16 | Page
TABLE H KITSAP CONFERENCE CENTER
All Rates are Minimum Rates
1. ROOM RENTAL (in conjunction with food minimums) 1
a) Puget Sound Ballroom- per section (4 sections) $500.00
b) Oyster Bay Room $250.00
a)c) Marina Vista 1 & 2 – per section $200.00
c)d) Marina Vista 3 $500.00
d)e) Glacier Cove 1 & 2 – per section $200.00
e)f) Fountain Room $850.00
2. EVENT FEE
a) Puget Sound Ballroom- per section (4 sections) $500.00
b) Oyster Bay Room $250.00
c) Marina Vista 1 & 2 – per section $300.00
d) Marina Vista 3 $750.00
e) Glacier Cove 1 & 2 – per section $300.00
f) Fountain Room $1,000.00
1. 501(c)3 Organizations receive 50% off Room Rental rate with purchase of an Event Package.
3. RECURRING ROOM RENTAL (at least 35 events per year)
a) Room fee waived with food purchase for at least 60 people.
202019 Rates & Fees 17 | Page
TABLE I MUNICIPAL COURT
1. ANTI-HARRASSMENT ORDER $73.00
2. HEARING EXAMINER APPEAL $73.00
3. TRAFFIC PENALTIES
a) Inattention to Driving $139.00136.00
b) Automated Traffic Safety Camera Violations $139.00136.00
18 | Page
TABLE J PARKING
1. PARKING FEES*
a) On-Street Locations
− 3 hours $20.00
− 10 hours $30.00
b) Off-Street Location
− 3 hours $20.00
− 10 hours $30.00
c) Parking Garage Monthly Permit $200.00
d) Administrative Immobilization Fee (i.e. boot) $100.00
2. RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMITS*
a) Residential Parking Permits
− First Two Permits NO CHARGE
− Each additional permit issued not-to-exceed four permits per unit $100.00
b) Petition for Creation of Residential Restricted Parking Zone $100.00
c) Replacement of parking permit $10.00
d) Visitor Parking Permits $20.00
c)e) Service/Landlord Permits $20.00
3. PARKING PENALTIES
a) Overtime or Reparking
− 1st Violation in 180 Days $20.00
− 2nd Violation in 180 Days $60.00
− 3rd or More Violation in 180 Days $180.00
b) Non-Payment in Collection Devices
− 1st Violation in 180 days $20.00
− 2nd Violation in 180 days $60.00
− 3rd Violation in 180 days $180.00
c) Loading Zones $25.00
d) No Parking $30.00
− 1st Violation in 180 days $30.00
− 2nd Violation in 180 days $60.00
− 3rd Violation in 180 days $180.00
e) Wrong Way $30.0035.00
f) Parked on Sidewalk $30.00
g) Fire Hydrant $30.0035.00
h) 12" From Curb $30.00
i) Physically Disabled (Public and Private) $450.00
j) Counterfeiting or User of Counterfeit Permits,
− Tokens or Script $500.00
− Unauthorized Use of Permits $250.00
k) Blocked Driveway $30.0035.00
l) Expired Tabs $45.00
m) 30 Foot to Stop Sign $30.00
n) Double Parked $30.0035.00
202019 Rates & Fees 19 | Page
o) No Stopping/No Standing $30.00
p) Failure to Respond – Additional Penalty $25.00
q) All parking infractions set forth in Chapter 10.10 BMC not identified above $20.0030.00
4. *Rates are not-to-exceed rates. These rates shall apply unless reduced by the Department of Financial
Services for a specific site or use.
20 | Page
TABLE K PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Non-Resident Fee – Base Fee plus 25%
All Rates Listed Are “Not To Exceed” Fees
9. FACILITY USE RENTAL RATES
• Facility use policies apply.
• Appropriate taxes are included in rates unless otherwise noted.
• Regular Groups (10 or more meetings a year, reserved in advance) may receive up to a 20%
discount on Facility and Park Rental Fees.
a) SHERIDAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER – ROOM RENTAL RATES
− (Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL – Rental Rates
Recreation and/or educational purposes only.
Per hour, two (2) hour minimum
• Daytime (Monday – Friday: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM)
(i) Lounge $11.5011.75
(ii) Room A, B/C, Conference Room $9.509.75
(iii) Gym $28.0028.50
• Evenings (Monday – Thursday: 5:00 PM to 10:00 PM)
(i) Lounge $28.0028.50
(ii) Room A, B, Conference Room $22.0022.50
(iii) Gym $38.5040.00
(iv) Room Package (Lounge & Gym) $63.7565.00
(v) Entire building – Up to eight (8) hours* $730.00745.00
• Friday Evening (5:00 PM to 10:00 PM) & Saturday and Sunday
(i) Lounge $33.2534.00
(ii) Room A, B, Conference Room $25.0025.50
(iii) Gym $46.0047.00
(iv) Room Package (Lounge & Gym) $75.2576.75
(v) Entire building – Up to eight (8) hours* $755.00770.00
− (Group B) COMMERCIAL – Rental Rates
Per hour, two (2) hour minimum
• Lounge $50.0051.00
• Room A, B, Conference Room $38.0038.25
• Gym $69.0070.50
• Room Package (Lounge & Gym) $113.00115.25
• Entire Building - Up to eight (8) hours* $1,130.001,155.00
*Entire building rental for events with 250 or more participants requires additional staffing fee at $17.5018.00
per hour.
202019 Rates & Fees 21 | Page
b) BREMERTON SR. CITIZENS CENTER - ROOM RENTAL RATES
− (Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL – Rental Rates
• Per hour, two (2) hour minimum
• Cardroom/Meeting Room $23.0023.50
• Main Room $45.0046.00
• Kitchen $23.0023.50
• Additional staffing per hour $17.5018.00
• Entire Facility up to eight (8) hours $750.00510.00*
(*Note: The $750 amount was not correct for 2019, should have been $500)
− (Group B) COMMERCIAL – Rental Rates
• Per hour, (two ) 2 hour minimum
• Cardroom/Meeting Room $44.0035.25
• Main Room $86.0069.00
• Kitchen $44.0035.25
• Additional staffing per hour $17.5018.00
• Entire Facility – Up to eight (8) hours $750.00765.00
PARK SHELTERS – RESERVATION FEES
Four (4) hour sessions per reservation unless otherwise noted.
Bremerton residents may reserve park shelters beginning January 1st for the upcoming year. Non-
resident reservations will be accepted beginning February 1st.
− (Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL – Rental Rates
• Bachmann, Bataan, Lent Landing, Matan, NAD (Upper) Shelters and Gazebos
$30.00
• Blueberry Shelter $51.00
• Evergreen Shelter 1 $78.0079.50
• Evergreen Shelter 2 or 3 $41.0042.00
• Evergreen Shelter 4 (not reservable, first come first served) NO CHARGE
• Evergreen Shelter 5 or 6 $43.0044.00
• Evergreen Amphitheatre with power $190.00194.00
• Kiwanis Park Shelter $41.0042.00
• Lions Park Shelter 1 $53.0055.00
• Lions Park Shelter 2 $41.0042.00
• Manette Park Shelter $41.0042.00
• Reserve portion of a park not having a shelter. $36.0030.00
− (Group B) COMMERCIAL – Rental Rates
• Bachmann, Bataan, Lent Landing, Matan, NAD (Upper) Shelters and Gazebos
$45.00
• Blueberry Shelter $76.50
• Evergreen Shelter 1 $117.00119.25
• Evergreen Shelter 2 or 3 $61.5063.00
• Evergreen Shelter 4 (not reservable) NO CHARGE
• Evergreen Shelter 5 or 6 $64.5066.00
• Evergreen Amphitheatre with power $285.00291.00
• Kiwanis Park Shelter $61.5063.00
22 | Page
• Lions Park Shelter 1 $79.5082.50
• Lions Park Shelter 2 $61.5063.00
• Manette Park Shelter $61.5063.00
• Reserve portion of a park not having a shelter. $45.00
c) SPECIAL EVENTS, CELEBRATIONS, WEDDINGS
(Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL – Rental Rates
− Harborside Fountain Park (Waterfront plaza only, per four (4) hour session
$40.0042.00
− Louis Mentor Boardwalk $500.00510.00
− Stage (20’ x 24’) –Available Memorial Day-Labor Day (per day) $225.00230.00
(Group B) COMMERCIAL – Rental Rates
− Harborside Fountain Park (Waterfront plaza only, per four (4) hour session $63.00
− Louis Mentor Boardwalk $765.00
− Stage (20’x24’) – Available Memorial Day-Labor Day (per day) $345.00
d) ATHLETIC FIELD – RESERVATIONS
Per hour unless noted
− (Group A) NON-COMMERCIAL
• Youth Use $16.5017.00
• Adult Use $31.0031.75
− (Group B) COMMERCIAL $55.0056.00
• Game Fees
(i) Baseball/Softball $38.5039.00
(ii) Soccer $59.0060.00
(iii) Sand Volleyball $30.00
e) BLUEBERRY PARK – P-PATCH ANNUAL RATE
Non-commercial gardening only.
− Raised Beds $13.0014.00
− 10’ x 20’ Beds $52.0053.00
− 16’ x 30’ Beds $75.0076.00
f) LIONS TENNIS COURT LIGHTS
− 1 token (1 hour) $2.50
− 6 tokens (6 hours) $11.2511.50
2. PROGRAM FEES & CHARGES
a) NEW PROGRAMS See Section 3, subsection (a)
b) ATHLETIC PROGRAM FEES
− VOLLEYBALL
• League Play (per team, per game) $30.00
• Open Gym (Oct. – June) per person $4.00
• Sand Volleyball $30.00
202019 Rates & Fees 23 | Page
− BASKETBALL
• Men’s League Play (per team, per game) $63.5064.00
• Boy’s League Play (per team, per game) $37.5038.00
• Boy’s League (Individual Registration - per individual) $47.0048.00
- PICKLEBALL
• Drop In $3.00
• 10-Visit Punchcard $24.00
− SOFTBALL
• Adult League Play (per team, per game) $46.0047.00
• Adult League – Players fee (per player, per game) $2.052.07
− TOURNAMENTS (BASEBALL/SOFTBALL AND SOCCER)
INVITATIONAL TOURNAMENTS
c) Lions – One Day $426.00434.00
d) Lions – Two Day $680.00693.00
e) Lions – Three Day $905.00923.00
f) Pendergast – One Day $560.00571.00
g) Pendergast – Two Day $873.00890.00
h) Pendergast – Three Day $1,062.001083.00
STATE TOURNAMENTS*
i) Lions – One Day $592.00604.00
j) Lions – Two Day $884.00902.00
k) Lions – Three Day $1,029.001,050.00
l) Pendergast – One Day $767.00782.00
m) Pendergast – Two Day $1,029.001,050.00
n) Pendergast – Three Day $1,220.001,244.00
*Regional and National Tournaments cost to be negotiated depending on field preparation requirements.
3. SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER AND RECREATION DIVISION PROGRAMS
a) PROGRAM FEE FORMULAS. Except for the Sr. Citizens Trip program, participant fees for activities
(programs, classes, events, etc.) promoted by the Sr. Citizen Center and the Recreation Division are
established by the following formulas:
− Activities when the instructor is on City payroll.
*Based on “Not-to-Exceed” rates
[(Total class hours including preparation) x (Instructor’s hourly wage) x (1.5 Administration
factor)] divided by (minimum # of students per activity)] + (the cost of group supplies divided by
minimum # of students) + Cost of individual class supplies, if applicable = Student class fee for
City of Bremerton Resident
− Activities taught by contracted instruction.
*Based on “Not-to-Exceed” rates
24 | Page
[(Price per student required by the Instructor less class supply fees) x (1.5 Administration
factor)] + Class supply fees = Student class fee for City of Bremerton Resident.
− Non-Resident Fees for Recreational Programs.
For recreation classes, programs, and rentals – ranging from:
• $5.00 to $25.00 add on 25%
• $25.01 to $50.00 add a flat $6.25
• $50.01 to $100.00 add a flat $12.50
• $100.01 to $200.00 add a flat $25.00
• $200.01 to $400.00add a flat $50.00
• $400.01 to $750.00 add a flat $100.00
• $750.01 to $1,000.00 add a flat $150.00
• $1,000.00 + add a flat $200.00
b) SENIOR CENTER ACTIVITIES (AGE 55+)
Couples Membership is for two people, at least one needs to be 55 or better, who reside at the
same address.
Associate Memberships are for those individuals not yet 55 but still would like to participate in the
programs, trips and classes offered at the Center.
− Senior Citizen – City Resident annual membership $17.0017.25
− Senior Citizen – Non-Resident annual membership $34.0034.50
− Senior Center – City Resident Couples annual membership $25.0025.50
− Senior Center – Non-Resident Couples annual membership $50.0051.00
− Senior Center – City Resident Associate annual membership $25.0025.50
− Senior Center – Non-Resident Associate annual membership $50.0051.00
c) SENIOR CENTER TRIPS Cost plus 25%
202019 Rates & Fees 25 | Page
TABLE L POLICE DEPARTMENT
1. TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORTS $10.00
2. FINGERPRINTS – 1st Card $10.00
a) Each Additional Card $10.00
3. CRIMINAL HISTORY CHECK $10.00
4. ALARM COMPLIANCE FEE
a) 1st False Alarm in any 1 Quarter $60.00
b) 2nd False Alarm in the same Quarter $80.00
c) 3rd False Alarm in the same Quarter or Subsequent Alarms in a Calendar Quarter
$160.00
5. SERVICE FEE FOR ANTI-HARASSMENT ORDER $50.00
6. SERVICE OF ARREST WARRANTS AND SUBPOENAS
a) Arrest Warrant $15.00 plus mileage
b) Subpoena $6.00 plus mileage
c) Preparation of return of service $5.00
Mileage (for each mile actually and necessarily traveled by a member of the Police Department in going to or returning from any
place of service, or attempted service) current business mileage rate allowed by the Internal Revenue Service.
7. TAXICABS
a) Taxicab Business Certificate $30.00/year
b) Taxicab Driver’s Certificate $30.00/year
c) Vehicle Decal $10.00/vehicle/year
d) Annual Renewal $30.00
e) Certificate Changes $10.00
f) Finger prints $10.00
g) WSP Background Check (effective 1/1/2019) $51.25
WSP Background Check (effective 7/1/2019) $71.25
8. CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS (Rates set by State subject to change)
a) New Permit (effective 1/1/2019) $49.25
b) Renewal Permit $32.00
c) Late Permit $42.00
d) Replacement $10.00
e) Firearm Dealer License $125.00
26 | Page
TABLE M PUBLIC RECORD FEES
1. Copy or Print - Letter or Legal paper size (No fee for first 50 pages) $0.15/page
2. Scan – Letter or Legal paper size (No fee for first 50 pages) $0.10/page
3. Electronic Files or Attachment uploaded to email, cloud-based data storage service or other means of
electronic delivery $0.05/4 files
4. Transmission of Public Records in an Electronic Format $0.10/GB
5. Video Reproduction (includes personnel time) Actual Costs
6. CD/DVD $2.00
7. USB 2 GB $5.00
8. Postage or Delivery Charges Actual Costs
9. Certification $5.00
10. Oversized Plans, Aerial Photos, Drawings, and Maps (Black and White) $8.00/page or
Actual Costs when performed by a Vendor
11. Color GIS Plotted Maps $5.00/sq. ft.
12. Other Documents:
a) Medical Records $19.00
b) Fire Incident/Investigation Reports $8.00
c) Budget
− (Hard Copy) $70.00
− (Electronic Version) $10.00
d) Annual Report
− (Hard Copy) $35.00
− (Electronic Version) $10.00
In addition to the above fees, each department may establish fees for records that do not fall into one of
the above categories. Each department and the City Clerk shall have the department's fee schedule
available for inspection upon request.
202019 Rates & Fees 27 | Page
TABLE N PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. RIGHT-OF WAY USE PERMITS FEES
a) Type A (Short Term Use) Regular (Misc. Construction) $307.00320.00
− Dumpster – Individual personal use NO CHARGE
− Dumpster – Commercial/Construction $153.32320.00
b) Type B (Disturbance of ROW)
− Sidewalk Repairs (2 inspections) NO CHARGE
− Driveway, Transverse Street Patch and Spot Patches (2 inspections) $307.00320.00
− Frontage Improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, illumination, etc.); Longitudinal Street Patch;
and Utility Installation $3.834.00/ft with a $230.00240.00
minimum
− New Street $6.526.80/ft with a $782815.00
minimum
− Water & Sewer Mains & Laterals (ROW Permit) (2 inspections) $307.00320.00
− Additional Inspection $76.6680.00/hour + equipment
charges
c) Type C (Long Term Use)
− Application and Processing $ $307.00320.00
− Annual Renewal $ $76.6680.00
d) Type D Regular (Franchised Utility Routine Maintenance) $153.32160.00
e) Plan Reviews $0.270.25/foot of improvement with $112160.00
minimum
2. ADDITIONAL WORK $76.6680.00/hour + Equipment
Charges
3. RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION $1,750.00
4. BMC 10.24 HOUSEMOVING/OVERSIZE LOADS $635640.00+$69.00/mile to .10 of a mile
5. BANNER FEE INSTALL/REMOVAL $100.00212.00
6. MEMORIAL SIGN CREATION $500.00COST
7. TRAFFIC CONTROL $74.0080.00/hour + Equipment
Charges
8. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
a) Barricades if not returned $30.00/barricade
b) Barricades $20.00 per barricade per day
b)c) Cones, if not returned or damaged $16.00/cone
d) Cones $2.00 per cone per day
28 | Page
c)e) Signs, if not returned or damaged $215.00/sign
f) Signs $18.00 per sign per day
g) Labor Rate Hourly (equipment not included) $80
9. SIGN CREATION COST
9.10. BLOCK PARTY STREET CLOSURE $25.00
202019 Rates & Fees 29 | Page
TABLE O TAX & LICENSE
1. REGULATORY LICENSE FEES
a) BMC 5.17 Charitable Solicitation
− Non-Profit $25.00/60 days
− Professional Fundraiser $675.00/60 days
b) BMC 5.22 Dance/Public $265.00/yr or $70.00/30 days
c) BMC 5.96 Erotic Dance Studios $700.00/yr
d) Dancers $100.00/yr
e) BMC 5.16 Mobile Food Vendor $150.00/veh/yr
f) BMC 5.16 Peddlers $75.00/yr or $25.00/30 days
g) BMC 5.36 Special Events $100.00/event
h) BMC 5.08 Street/Sidewalk Vendors $100/yr
i) Site Relocation $50.00
j) BMC 5.16 Temporary Merchant $400.00/30 days
2. BUSINESS LICENSE FEE
a) BMC 5.02 $75.00/yr
30 | Page
TABLE P TELECOMMUNICATIONS
1. TOWER LEASE - APPLICATION, RENEWAL AND ASSIGNMENT FEE $530.00
2. CABLE FRANCHISE APPLICATION AND RENEWAL FEE DEPOSIT1 $3,588.00
1Actual cost will be based on staff time. City may require additional deposit(s) up to $3,500 per deposit if funds
are exhausted.
3. MASTER PERMIT - APPLICATION AND RENEWAL FEE DEPOSITS2 $5,125.00
2Actual cost will be based on staff time plus legal review. City may require additional deposit(s) up to $5,000
per deposit if funds are exhausted.
4. TELECOM LICENSE FEE $222.00/one time
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Ordinance amending Section 15.06.015 of
the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
“Assessments, Rates, Fees and Charges –
Established” (General Facility Charges)
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: PW&U
Presenter: Thomas Knuckey
Phone: (360) 473-2376
SUMMARY: The proposed ordinance updates language in Section 15.06.015 of the Bremerton
Municipal Code to change the index relating to rate adjustments of general facility charges.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Ordinance Updated
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ Limited Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Ordinance No. ________ amending Section 15.06.015 of the Bremerton Municipal
Code relating to Assessments, Rates, Fees and Charges.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A12
Updated
Page 1 of 2
BMC 15.06.015 - GFC Adjustments
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Section 15.06.015 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code entitled “Assessments, Rates, Fees and
Charges – Established.”
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend Section 15.06.015 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code entitled “Assessments, Rates, Fees and Charges – Established” in
order to change the index relating rate adjustments of general facility charges; NOW
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 15.06.015 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
“Assessments, Rates, Fees and Charges – Established.” is hereby amended to read as follows:
15.06.015 ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES AND CHARGES - ESTABLISHED
(a) Assessments, rates, fees, and charges for services relating to the Department for
water, wastewater, stormwater utilities, and other related services are on file with the City Clerk
and posted on the City of Bremerton’s website. See Chapter 3.01 BMC for the link to the City of
Bremerton’s website for rates and fees.
(b) Commencing on January 1, 2018, and on January 1st of each successive year
thereafter, the established utility rates, fees and charges identified in Chapter 3.01 BMC, not
otherwise adjusted by the City Council during the previous six (6) month period, shall
automatically be adjusted as follows:
(1) The utility GFCs shall be adjusted upward to the nearest dollar based upon
the most current ENR (Engineering News-Record) Construction Cost Index - 20 City
AverageSeattle Construction Index (SCI); and
(2) All other utility rates, fees and charges shall be adjusted upward to the
nearest dollar based on the most current Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers,
Seattle.
SECTION 2. Corrections. The City Clerk and codifiers of this ordinance are
authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the
correction of scrivener, clerical, typographical, and spelling errors, references, ordinance
numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.
SECTION 3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences
of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and
effect.
Page 2 of 2
BMC 15.06.015 - GFC Adjustments
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the___________ day of ____________________, 2019.
_________________________________
ERIC YOUNGER, Council President
Approved this ________ day of ________________________, 2019.
_________________________________
GREG WHEELER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ _________________________________
ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the ________ day of ______________________, 2019.
EFFECTIVE the ________ day of ______________________, 2019.
ORDINANCE NO. ________.
R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Public Works & Utilities\2019.10.17 BMC 15.06.015 - Ordinance.docx
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Ordinance amending and re-establishing
Utility Assessments, Rates, Fees, and
Charges for 2020
COUNCIL MEETING Date: November 6, 2019
Department: Financial Services and
PW&U
Presenter: Mike Riley/Tom
Knuckey
Phone: (360) 473-5303
SUMMARY: Ordinance to amend and re-establish the 2020 Utility Assessments, Rates, Fees, and
Charges.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance No. ______; and 2) Exhibit A
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): General Facility Charges (GFCs) were adjusted by
3.57%, the annual change in the 20-City national average Construction Cost Index (CCI) published
by Engineering News-Record (ENR). Miscellaneous fees were adjusted by an annual change in the
Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue for the month
ended August 31, 2019 at 3.2%. The Utility rates are incorporated in the 2020 Proposed Budget.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ Limited Presentation ☒ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Ordinance No. ____ amending and re-establishing 2020 Assessments, Rates, Fees,
and Charges for Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, and other related services.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/02/2018
A13
1
2020 Utilities Rates and Fees
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending and reestablishing the
assessments, rates, fees and charges established in Ordinance No.
5358 regarding rates and fees relating to the Department of Public
Works and Utilities for water, wastewater, stormwater and other
related services.
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend and reestablish the assessments,
rates, fees, and charges (“Rates and Fees”) relating to the Department of Public Works and
Utilities for general facility charges and water, wastewater, stormwater, and other related
services established in Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 5358; NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Rate Tables established. Rates and fees for services relating to the
Department of Public Works and Utilities for general facilities charges and water, wastewater,
stormwater, and other related services, as established in Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 5358, are
hereby amended and reestablished in their entirety as set forth in the attached Exhibit A of this
ordinance, said exhibit is incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. Rate Tables – Effective Date. The amendment and
reestablishment of rate tables as set forth in Section 1 above shall be effective January 1, 2020.
SECTION 3. Corrections. The City Clerk and codifiers of this ordinance
are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the
correction of scrivener, clerical, typographical, and spelling errors, references, ordinance
numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto.
SECTION 4. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the _____ day of November, 2019.
_________________________________
ERIC YOUNGER, Council President
2
2020 Utilities Rates and Fees
Approved this ________ day of November, 2019.
_________________________________
GREG WHEELER, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ _________________________________
ANGELA HOOVER, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the ________ day of ______________________, 2019.
EFFECTIVE the ________ day of ______________________, 2019.
ORDINANCE NO. ________.
R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Public Works & Utilities\2020 Utility Rates & Fees Ordinance.doc
2019
GENERAL FACILITY CHARGES
Water based on meter size average normal flow
5/8" x 3/4" 6,074.00$
1" 6,074.00$
1" Commercial 8,322.00$
1 1/2" Commercial 48,592.00$
2" Commercial 48,592.00$
3" Commercial 121,481.00$
4" Commercial 242,962.00$
Greater than 4"
5/8" x 3/4" 7,089.00$
1" 7,089.00$
1" Commercial 8,791.00$
1 1/2" Commercial 49,626.00$
2" Commercial 49,626.00$
3" Commercial 127,611.00$
4" Commercial 255,221.00$
Greater than 4"
Stormwater (per IHSU)3,261.00$
CONNECTION FEES
Water Connection Fees Inside Outside
5/8" x 3/4" 3,247.00$ 3,376.00$ 4,871.00$ 5,064.00$
1" 3,434.00$ 3,562.00$ 5,151.00$ 5,343.00$
1 1/2" 8,365.00$ 8,558.00$ 12,548.00$ 12,837.00$
2" 8,829.00$ 9,022.00$ 13,244.00$ 13,533.00$
3" - 4" x 4" - Service to property line 15,618.00$ NA 23,427.00$ NA
3" - 4" x 6" - Service to property line 15,646.00$ NA 23,469.00$ NA
3" - 4" x 8" - Service to property line 15,658.00$ NA 23,487.00$ NA
3" - 4" x 10" - Service to property line 15,735.00$ NA 23,603.00$ NA
3" - 4" x 12" - Service to property line 15,716.00$ NA 23,574.00$ NA
3" NA 16,169.00$ NA 24,254.00$
4" - 4" x 4" - Service to property line 17,694.00$ NA 26,541.00$ NA
4" - 4" x 6" - Service to property line 17,723.00$ NA 26,585.00$ NA
4" - 4" x 8" - Service to property line 17,734.00$ NA 26,601.00$ NA
4" - 4" x 10" - Service to property line 17,812.00$ NA 26,718.00$ NA
4" - 4" x 12" - Service to property line 17,792.00$ NA 26,688.00$ NA
4" NA 18,246.00$ NA 27,369.00$
6" - 6" x 6" - Service to property line 22,943.00$ NA 34,415.00$ NA
6" - 6" x 8" - Service to property line 22,899.00$ NA 34,349.00$ NA
6" - 6" x 10" - Service to property line 22,991.00$ NA 34,487.00$ NA
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE January 1, 2020
251,636.00$
2020
Inside & Outside City Limits
6,291.00$
6,291.00$
8,619.00$
50,327.00$
50,327.00$
125,818.00$
Case by Case basis
Wastewater based on meter size average normal flow
7,342.00$
7,342.00$
9,105.00$
51,398.00$
51,398.00$
132,167.00$
264,332.00$
Case by Case basis
3,377.00$
1 of 9
2019
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE January 1, 2020
2020
Water Connection Fees (continued)Inside Outside
6" - 6" x 12" - Service to property line 22,975.00$ NA 34,463.00$ NA
6" NA 23,426.00$ NA 35,139.00$
8" - 8" x 8" - Service to property line 29,127.00$ NA 43,691.00$ NA
8" - 8" x 10" - Service to property line 29,010.00$ NA 43,515.00$ NA
8" - 8" x 12" - Service to property line 28,858.00$ NA 43,287.00$ NA
8" NA 29,444.00$ NA 44,166.00$
10" - 10" x 10" - Service to property line 36,743.00$ NA 55,115.00$ NA
10" - 10" x 12" - Service to property line 37,187.00$ NA 55,781.00$ NA
10" NA 37,621.00$ NA 56,432.00$
12" and greater
Wet Tapping (Water Main Only, excluding excavation & backfill)*
Inside Outside
4" x 4" - excluding excavation & backfill 2,797.00$ NA 4,196.00$ NA
4" x 6" - excluding excavation & backfill 2,826.00$ NA 4,239.00$ NA
4" x 8" - excluding excavation & backfill 2,837.00$ NA 4,256.00$ NA
4" x 10" - excluding excavation & backfill 2,914.00$ NA 4,371.00$ NA
4" x 12" - excluding excavation & backfill 2,895.00$ NA 4,343.00$ NA
4" NA 2,995.00$ NA 4,493.00$
6" x 6" - excluding excavation & backfill 3,124.00$ NA 4,686.00$ NA
6" x 8" - excluding excavation & backfill 3,079.00$ NA 4,619.00$ NA
6" x 10" - excluding excavation & backfill 3,172.00$ NA 4,758.00$ NA
6" x 12" - excluding excavation & backfill 3,107.00$ NA 4,661.00$ NA
6" NA 3,252.00$ NA 4,878.00$
8" x 8" - excluding excavation & backfill 4,181.00$ NA 6,272.00$ NA
8" x 10" - excluding excavation & backfill 4,064.00$ NA 6,096.00$ NA
8" x 12" - excluding excavation & backfill 3,845.00$ NA 5,768.00$ NA
8" NA 4,145.00$ NA 6,218.00$
10" x 10" - excluding excavation & backfill 5,404.00$ NA 8,106.00$ NA
10" x 12" - excluding excavation & backfill 5,982.00$ NA 8,973.00$ NA
10" NA 6,728.00$ NA 10,092.00$
12" x 12" - excluding excavation & backfill 6,350.00$ NA 9,525.00$ NA
12" and greater
Wet Tapping (Water Main to Property Line)*
Inside Outside
2" - service 4,632.00$ 4,825.00$ 6,948.00$ 7,238.00$
4" x 4" - service 10,535.00$ NA 15,803.00$ NA
4" x 6" - service 10,563.00$ NA 15,845.00$ NA
4" x 8" - service 10,574.00$ NA 15,861.00$ NA
4" x 10" - service 10,652.00$ NA 15,978.00$ NA
4" x 12" - service 10,632.00$ NA 15,948.00$ NA
4" NA 11,067.00$ NA 16,601.00$
6" x 6" - service 10,875.00$ NA 16,313.00$ NA
6" x 8" - service 10,831.00$ NA 16,247.00$ NA
6" x 10" - service 10,923.00$ NA 16,385.00$ NA
6" x 12" - service 10,908.00$ NA 16,362.00$ NA
6" NA 11,342.00$ NA 17,013.00$
8" x 8" - service 12,717.00$ NA 19,076.00$ NA
Actual time & material + equipment
Actual time & material + equipment
2 of 9
2019
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE January 1, 2020
2020
Water Connection Fees (continued)Inside Outside
8" x 10" - service 12,600.00$ NA 18,900.00$ NA
8" x 12" - service 12,448.00$ NA 18,672.00$ NA
8" NA 13,035.00$ NA 19,553.00$
10" x 10" - service 14,914.00$ NA 22,371.00$ NA
10" x 12" - service 15,358.00$ NA 23,037.00$ NA
10" NA 15,792.00$ NA 23,688.00$
12" x 12" - service 15,400.00$ NA 23,100.00$ NA
12" and greater
Fire Hydrant Installation*Inside Outside
6" x 8" and smaller - service to property line 13,878.00$ 14,312.00$ 20,817.00$ 21,468.00$
6"x 10" - service to property line 13,971.00$ 14,405.00$ 20,957.00$ 21,608.00$
6"x 12" service to property line 13,955.00$ 14,389.00$ 20,933.00$ 21,584.00$
PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION FEES
Engineering Services**Inside Outside
Plan Check Fees
Main Extensions: per foot 0.55$ 0.57$ 0.83$ 0.86$
BUT not less than 383.00$ 383.00$ 575.00$ 575.00$
(Includes hydrants and appurtenances
and connection to water system)
Pump Stations 3,066.00$ 3,200.00$ 4,600.00$ 4,800.00$
Fireline Extension 153.00$ 160.00$ 230.00$ 240.00$
Irrigation Systems 153.00$ 160.00$ 230.00$ 240.00$
Miscellaneous (per hour) plus equipment 77.00$ 80.00$ 115.00$ 120.00$
Storm Drainage Plan Review Fees ***
Preliminary Drainage Plans
Residential Development 613.00$ 640.00$ N/A N/A
Non-Residential Development 383.00$ 400.00$ N/A N/A
Plus per IHSU 19.00$ 20.00$
Final Detailed Drainage Plans
Residential Development (per lot)
0 - 20 Lots 65.00$ 68.00$ N/A N/A
21 - 50 Lots 58.00$ 60.00$ N/A N/A
51 - 100 Lots 46.00$ 48.00$ N/A N/A
100+ Lots 38.00$ 40.00$ N/A N/A
Minimum Charge 460.00$ 480.00$ N/A N/A
Non-Residential Development
per IHSU 25.00$ 40.00$ N/A N/A
Minimum Charge 377.00$ 480.00$ N/A N/A
Resubmittal Fees
First Resubmittal No Charge No Charge N/A N/A
Subsequent Resubmittal 460.00$ 480.00$ N/A N/A
Actual time & material + equipment
3 of 9
2019
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE January 1, 2020
2020
Field Inspection Fees
Water main extensions (per foot) 1.53$ 1.60$ 2.30$ 2.40$
but not less than: 536.62$ 560.00$ 804.93$ 840.00$
Pump Station 3,066.00$ 3,200.00$ 4,600.00$ 4,800.00$
Miscellaneous (per hour) 76.66$ 80.00$ 115.00$ 120.00$
Wastewater Connection Fees
Lateral Connection at P/L 153.00$ 160.00$ 230.00$ 240.00$
Lateral Connection at Main 383.00$ 400.00$ 575.00$ 600.00$
Conveyance Facility Ext. (Per Foot) 3.00$ 3.20$ 5.00$ 5.00$
but not less than: 767.00$ 800.00$ 1,150.00$ 1,200.00$
Pump Station 3,066.00$ 3,200.00$ 4,600.00$ 4,800.00$
Miscellaneous (per hour) 77.00$ 80.00$ 115.00$ 120.00$
Storm Drainage Inspection Fees ***Inside Outside
Residential Development (per lot) 77.00$ 80.00$ N/A N/A
Non-Residential Development (per IHSU) 38.00$ 40.00$ N/A N/A
Minimum Charge 307.00$ 320.00$ N/A N/A
Conveyance Facility Extensions (per foot) 2.00$ 2.00$ N/A N/A
Minimum Charge 460.00$ 480.00$ N/A N/A
Unscheduled Inspections**** (per site visit) 77.00$ 80.00$ N/A N/A
MISCELLANEOUS FEES AND CHARGES
Office Services
New Account (includes water turn-on) 22.00$ 23.00$ N/A N/A
Account Maintenance 5.00$ 5.00$ N/A N/A
Past Due Notice 3.00$ 3.00$ N/A N/A
ACH Credit -$ -$ N/A N/A
Lien Recovery Charge 108.00$ Cost N/A N/A
Close Account/Meter Read/Water Service Turn-
off 22.00$ 23.00$ N/A N/A
Utility/Lien Search Fee (Manual) per parcel 33.00$ 34.00$ N/A N/A
Park Reservation Fee (non-refundable) 125.00$ 125.00$ N/A N/A
Park Reservation Refundable Deposit 100.00$ 100.00$ N/A N/A
Field Services
Pavement Restoration Charge
(refundable, if assessed and not required)
Asphalt Patch 1,536.00$ 1,585.00$ 2,304.00$ 2,378.00$
Concrete Patch 1,730.00$ 1,785.00$ 2,145.00$ 2,678.00$
Asphalt Trench 3,448.00$ 3,558.00$ 5,172.00$ 5,337.00$
Concrete Trench 3,433.00$ 3,543.00$ 5,150.00$ 5,315.00$
County Road Permit N/A N/A Cost Cost
Water Meter Installation
3/4" & 1" 236.00$ 161.00$ 236.00$ 242.00$
1-1/2" & 2" 243.00$ 256.00$ 243.00$ 384.00$
3" and greater Actual Time, Materials & Equipment
4 of 9
2019
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE January 1, 2020
2020
Field Services (continued)Inside Outside
Water Meter Reactivation 53.00$ 66.00$ 53.00$ 99.00$
Water Meter Reinstallation 161.00$ 149.00$ 242.00$
Water Meter Deactivation 66.00$ 149.00$ 99.00$
Water Meter Tampering
Tampering Fee 426.00$ 458.00$ 426.00$ 687.00$
Tampering Repair
Fire Service - Detector, Meter & MXU 602.00$ 613.00$ 602.00$ 920.00$
Storz Adapter 290.00$ 323.00$ 290.00$ 485.00$
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on
(Customer Request)
Regular Hours 53.00$ 66.00$ 53.00$ 99.00$
After Hours 261.00$ 285.00$ 261.00$ 428.00$
Delinquency Notice 22.00$ 23.00$ 22.00$ 35.00$
Water Service Turn-off/Turn-on
(Delinquent Accounts)
Regular Hours 106.00$ 114.00$ 106.00$ 171.00$
After Hours 261.00$ 285.00$ 261.00$ 428.00$
Flow and Pressure Test (Uncertified)
3/4" & 1" meters only 106.00$ 114.00$ 106.00$ 171.00$
1-1/2" & 2" meters only 193.00$ 209.00$ 193.00$ 314.00$
Larger than 2"
Meter Test Fee (based on meter size)
3/4" & 1" 236.00$ 256.00$ 236.00$ 384.00$
1-1/2" & 2" 323.00$ 351.00$ 323.00$ 527.00$
3" or greater
Utility Plant Locates
Regular Hours N/C N/C N/C N/C
After Hours 260.00$ 285.00$ 260.00$ 285.00$
Emergency N/C N/C N/C N/C
Utility Compliance Specialist
Inspection 106.00$ 114.00$ 106.00$ 114.00$
Administration Fee 43.00$ 47.00$ 43.00$ 47.00$
Utility Labor Rate Hourly (Eqp not included) 87.00$ 95.00$ 87.00$ 95.00$
Actual Time, Materials & Equipment
Actual Time, Materials & Equipment
Actual Time, Materials & Equipment
5 of 9
2019
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE January 1, 2020
2020
RETAIL WATER SERVICE RATES
General Service - Monthly Service Charge Inside Outside
Meter Size
5/8 x 3/4 inches 14.30$ 14.73 21.44$ 22.08$
1 inch 16.34$ 16.83 24.52$ 25.26$
1 1/2 inch 23.23$ 23.93 34.85$ 35.90$
2 inch 31.21$ 32.15 46.81$ 48.21$
3 inch 59.22$ 61.00 88.82$ 91.48$
4 inch 110.04$ 113.34 165.05$ 170.00$
6 inch 391.24$ 402.98 586.86$ 604.47$
8 inch 1,429.13$ 1,472.00 2,143.71$ 2,208.02$
10 inch 5,097.10$ 5,250.01 7,645.63$ 7,875.00$
12 inch 19,161.62$ 19,736.47 28,742.42$ 29,604.69$
Residential Commodity Charge (per HCF)
Per HCF/Month 2.47$ 2.54 3.70$ 3.81
Non - Residential Commodity Charge (per HCF) 2.23$ 2.30 3.34$ 3.44
Fire Protection - Monthly Service Charge
Service Size
1 inch 29.67$ 30.56 44.49$ 45.82
1 1/2 inch 44.65$ 45.99 66.97$ 68.98
2 inch 58.05$ 59.79 87.07$ 89.68
3 inch 63.95$ 65.87 95.95$ 98.83
4 inch 69.72$ 71.81 104.57$ 107.71
6 inch 87.02$ 89.63 130.52$ 134.44
8 inch 115.85$ 119.33 173.78$ 178.99
10 inch 162.12$ 166.98 243.19$ 250.49
12 inch 231.60$ 238.55 347.41$ 357.83
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 4.47$ 4.60 6.70$ 6.90
- For Usage Other Than Firefighting
Low-Income (1) Senior and Low-Income(1) Disabled Citizen - Monthly Service Charge
Base Charge (per account) 5/8" x 3/4" 14.30$ 14.73 21.44$ 22.08
Base Charge (per account) 1" 16.34$ 16.83 24.52$ 25.26
Commodity Charge
0 - 5 HCF/Month
Over 5 HCF/Month 2.47$ 2.54 3.70$ 3.81
Temporary/Construction Meter
1" Meter
Deposit 400.00$ 500.00 400.00$ 750.00$
Base Fee (per month) 16.34$ 16.83 16.34$ 25.26
Set Up Fee & Removal Fee 342.00$ 342.00 342.00$ 513.00$
No Charge No Charge
6 of 9
2019
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE January 1, 2020
2020
RETAIL WATER SERVICE RATES (CONTINUED)Inside Outside
Temporary/Construction Meter (continued)
Hydrant meter (3" Meter)
Deposit 2,856.00$ 3,000.00 2,856.00$ 4,500.00$
Base Fee (per month) 59.22$ 61.00 59.22$ 91.50$
Set Up Fee 342.00$ 342.00 342.00$ 513.00$
Equipment Loss/Damage
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 2.23$ 2.30 3.34$ 3.44
City Parks and Recreation Dept. - Irrigation
Commodity Charge (per HCF)1.12$ 1.15
Gold Mountain Golf Course Complex - Irrigation
Commodity Charge (per HCF)1.51$ 1.56
RETAIL WASTEWATER SERVICE RATES Inside Outside
Monthly Service Charge
Single Family
Base Charge (per account)36.15$ 37.23 54.22$ 55.85
Commodity Charge (per HCF)4.85$ 5.00 7.27$ 7.49
Duplex on 1 Meter or 2 Bldgs. on 1 Meter
Base Charge (per unit)28.62$ 29.48 42.94$ 44.23
Commodity Charge (per HCF)4.85$ 5.00 7.27$ 7.49
Multi - Family
Base Charge (per unit)28.62$ 29.48 42.94$ 44.23
Commodity Charge (per HCF)4.85$ 5.00 7.27$ 7.49
Low-Income (1) Senior and Low-Income(1) Disabled Citizen
Base Charge (per account)22.42$ 23.09 34.06$ 35.08
Commodity Charge (per HCF)
0 - 10 HCF/Month
Over 10 HCF/Month 4.85$ 5.00 7.27$ 7.49
Commercial I
Base Charge (per account)53.44$ 55.04 80.16$ 82.56
Commodity Charge (per HCF)5.00$ 5.15 7.49$ 7.71
Commercial II
Base Charge (per account)53.83$ 55.44 80.74$ 83.16
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 6.40$ 6.59 9.60$ 9.89
Commercial III
Base Charge (per account) 54.36$ 55.99 81.55$ 84.00
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 7.82$ 8.05 11.72$ 12.07
Actual Time, Materials & Equipment
No Charge No Charge
7 of 9
2019
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE January 1, 2020
2020
RETAIL WASTEWATER SERVICE RATES (CONTINUED)
Monthly Service Charge Inside Outside
Commercial IV
Base Charge (per account) 54.89$ 56.54 82.34$ 84.81
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 9.23$ 9.51 13.84$ 14.26
Commercial V
Base Charge (per account) 60.38$ 62.19 90.59$ 93.31
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 11.54$ 11.89 17.31$ 17.83
Commercial VI
Base Charge (per account) 66.41$ 68.40 99.63$ 102.62
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 14.42$ 14.85 21.63$ 22.28
Commercial VII
Base Charge (per account) 73.06$ 75.25 109.59$ 112.88
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 16.84$ 17.35 25.27$ 26.03
Commercial Special
Base Charge (per account) 80.36$ 82.77 120.54$ 124.16
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 22.54$ 23.22 33.78$ 34.79
Beverage Production
Base Charge (per account) 54.36$ 55.99 81.55$ 84.00
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 5.08$ 5.23 7.61$ 7.84
Commercial Fountains - Separately Metered
Base Charge (per account) 53.44$ 55.04 80.16$ 82.56
Commodity Charge (per HCF) 1.65$ 1.70 2.47$ 2.54
Septage Disposal (per gallon of tank capacity) 0.27$ 0.28 0.40$ 0.41
Leachate Per Gallon of Tank Capacity
Individual Residential Grinder Pumps
Grinder Pump Surcharge 11.65$ 12.00 17.48$ 18.00
Low-Income (1) Senior and Low-Income(1) Disabled Citizen
Grinder Pump Surcharge 8.74$ 9.00 13.11$ 13.50
RETAIL STORMWATER RATES
Monthly Service Charge Inside Outside
Residential I (Single Family/Duplex)
Base Charge (per account) 16.17$ 17.54 N/A N/A
Exception: Duplex
with 2 Meters (per account) 8.13$ 8.77 N/A N/A
8 of 9
2019
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE January 1, 2020
2020
RETAIL STORMWATER RATES (CONTINUED)
Monthly Service Charge Inside Outside
Residential II - SW Impact Fee (per IHSU)
50% of the Res I Base Charge 8.08$ 8.77 N/A N/A
Residential III - SW Impact Fee (per IHSU)
100% of the Res I Base Charge 16.17$ 17.54 N/A N/A
Commercial I
Base Charge (per IHSU) 16.17$ 17.54 N/A N/A
Commercial II - SW Impact Fee (per IHSU)
50% of the Comm I Base Charge 8.08$ 8.77 N/A N/A
Commercial III - SW Impact Fee (per IHSU)
100% of the Comm I Base Charge 16.17$ 17.54 N/A N/A
Public School Districts (per account) 16.17$ 17.54 N/A N/A
Low-Income (1) Senior and Low-Income(1) Disabled Citizen
Base Charge (per account) 9.84$ 10.68 N/A N/A
Multi - Family & Commercial Rate Adjustment
Water Quality (per IHSU) 1.79$ 1.94 N/A N/A
Water Quantity (per IHSU) 5.40$ 5.86 N/A N/A
Stormwater Penalty
New Multi - Family & Commercial
development without on-site detention
Charge (per IHSU) 3.58$ 3.88 N/A N/A
(1) Low-Income defined as Gross Earned Income of $40,000 or less
*Pavement Restoration Charge May Also Be Assessed
** Fees include original review and one resubmittal review.
Additional reviews will be charged at miscellaneous hourly rate (above).
*** Does not apply to single family residence or duplex construction on an existing established lot.
**** (Unscheduled inspections shall be tracked through the course of a project and billed after
the final site inspection. Fees for unscheduled inspections shall be paid prior to final
9 of 9
Form Created 5/4/15
INFORMATION ONLY ITEM
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Discussion on Qualifying Local
Tax in support of SHB 1406
Study Session Date: October 23, 2019
Presenter: Mike Riley,
Finance Director
Phone: (360) 473-5303
SUMMARY:
HANDOUTS: “Qualifying Local Taxes Associated with HB1406”
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ No Presentation ☒ Full Presentation
A14
Form Created 5/4/15
INFORMATION ONLY ITEM
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Discussion on Rental Housing
Safety Program
Study Session Date:
October 23, 2019
Presenter:
Council President
Eric Younger
Phone:
(360) 473-5280
SUMMARY:
HANDOUTS: Multiple Handouts were distributed for Future Review (Kept on File)
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ No Presentation ☒ Full Presentation
A15