Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WEST HILLS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - BOOK 1
I CuotquaodaoD pluautuoatnua 00ua 1 I I I _. 1N3NJd0-2,170 kuNnILN�Vv00 .:4r, r _ .1 EI 9902 D Fiflil pi; 0 I I I I I 1 0,4000 /ocig I 1 I 1 1 West Hills Residential Development South of West Werner Road Sections 21, 28, & 29, Township 24N, Range 01E Bremerton, Kitsap County WA BOOK 1 — Text Report & APPENDICES A - G 1 Prepared for: Mr. Steve Chan Triway Enterprises, Inc. 1500 79th Avenue SE Olympia WA 98501 Prepared by: EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O. Box 731747 1508 East Pioneer, STE D Puyallup WA 9 373 Wildlife and Wetland Biologist: ' March 12, 200 Job#WTJK-TriwayWestHills-1 I I 1 I I V�V I EnCo Environmental Corporation ITABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SECTION PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 PURPOSE 1 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 2 4.0 METHODOLOGY 2 5.0 SCHEDULE 2 1 6.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3 6.1 CURRENT AND HISTORICAL LAND USE 3 111 6.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 7.0 ADJACENT PROPERTY LAND USE 4 I8.0 TOPOGRAPHY, DRAINAGE,AND FLOODPLAINS 4 9.0 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGIC SETTING 5 1 10.0 PUBLISHED WETLAND MAPS 12 10.1 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP 12 1 10.2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY WETLAND INVENTORY MAP 13 11.0 WETLAND DELINEATION DATA 14 ill 11.1 WETLAND DEFINITION 14 11.2 NORMAL, DISTURBED,AND PROBLEM AREAS 15 11.2.1 Normal Environmental Conditions 15 11.2.2 Significantly Disturbed(Atypical)Areas 15 I 11.2.3 Problematic Areas 15 11.3 WETLAND BOUNDARY IDENTIFICATION 16 11.4 VEGETATION 18 I 11.5 SOIL 18 11.5.1 Soil Indicators 18 11.5.2 Substrate Characteristics 19 11.5.3 Penetration Resistance 20 I 11.6 WETLAND HYDROLOGY 22 11.6.1 Wetland Hydrology Indicators 22 11.6.2 Water Input 24 11.6.3 Water Output 24 11.7 RATIONAL FOR DETERMINING WETLANDS 25 11.8 RATIONAL FOR DETERMINING NON-WETLANDS 25 11.9 WILDLIFE 26 11.9.1 Mammals 26 EnCo Environmental Corporation I 1 11.9.2 Birds 27 11.9.3 Amphibians and Reptiles 28 11.9.4 Mollusks 28 11.10 FISH 28 12.0 PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES 28 r12.1 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 28 12.2 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH&WILDLIFE 29 13.0 WETLAND CATEGORIES AND BUFFERS 31 13.1 WETLAND CATEGORIES 31 13.2 WETLAND BUFFERS 34 1 14.0 SHORELINES 35 15.0 STREAM CATEGORIES AND BUFFERS 36 15.1 STREAM TYPES 36 15.2 OTHER IDENTIFIED ON-SITE STREAMS 38 15.3 WADNR AND OTHER STREAM TYPE BUFFERS 39 16.0 BUILDING SETBACKS 40 17.0 REGULATORY EXEMPTIONS 40 18.0 OFF-SITE WETLANDS 42 19.0 CONCLUSIONS 42 20.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 42 21.0 REFERENCES 43 I I 1 r 1 r EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 I EnCo Environmental Corporation LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A FIGURES, DIAGRAMS, MAPS, AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 111 APPENDIX B TABLES APPENDIX C FIELD DATA FORMS 1 APPENDIX D FIELD PROCEDURES APPENDIX E REGULATORY FORMS, CORRESPONDENCE, AND DOCUMENTS WADOE Wetland Category Rating Forms — October 1991 Jurisdictional Governmental Agency Regulation Excerpts Government Agency Correspondence (WADNR & WAF&W) Other Documents and Excerpts APPENDIX F CREDENTIALS APPENDIX G TERMS AND CONDITIONS APPENDIX H PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG r Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration I I EnC0 Environmental Corporation LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: Vicinity Map FIGURE 2: Plot Map FIGURE 3: Aerial Map FIGURE 4: Topographic Map FIGURE 5: National Wetlands Inventory Map FIGURE 6: Soil Survey Map FIGURE 7: Flood Survey Map FIGURE 8: Local Wetlands Inventory Map FIGURE 9: Wetland Delineation Map FIGURE 10: State Water Type Map FIGURE 11: State Priority Habitat and Species Map FIGURE 12: Local Fish &Wildlife Habitat Map I 1 I I I I I I 1 I Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration 1 I APPENDIX SUMMARY A vicinity map, plot map, and a recent aerial photographic view of the subject property are presented respectively as FIGURES 1, 2, & 3 in APPENDIX A. Tables not included in the report text are presented in APPENDIX B. A professionally surveyed Wetland Delineation Map is presented as FIGURE 9. Several rolls of film were taken during the field work of which a selected number of photographs were used for the photographic log (APPENDIX H). The photographs depict selected test plots, wetland and non-wetland areas, surficial hydrologic conditions, topographic land features, and the observed vegetation communities. Completed field data forms (APPENDIX C) document the data pertaining to the vegetation, soil, and hydrologic conditions observed in the ecological communities evaluated in the field by the wildlife and wetland biologist. Field procedures (APPENDIX D) followed acceptable industry practices for performing professional wetland related studies. The WADOE wetland category rating forms presented in APPENDIX E documents the method used for determining the wetland categories. Wetland buffers were established according to the criteria established in the jurisdictional governmental agency critical area ordinance. Test excerpts from regulatory agencies and certain documents obtained and reviewed for this project are presented in APPENDIX E. The credentials of the individuals involved in the preparation of this report are presented in APPENDIX F. Terms and Conditions that apply to this report are presented as APPENDIX G. I I I I I i I Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation,Mitigation&Restoration 1 I WETLAND DELINEATION WITH CATEGORY & BUFFER DETERMINATIONS Pd West esDelopment I Southroposeof the 5000Hills BlockRof idential West WernerevRoad Part of Sections 21, 28, & 29, Township 24N, Range 01E Bremerton, Kitsap County WA Report Date: March 12, 2006 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EnCo Environmental Corporation (EnCo) has completed the delineation, categorization, and standard buffer width determination for jurisdictional wetlands identified on the above-referenced property. The work was performed within the scope and limitations of EnCo's October 21, 2005 proposal that was signed on October 21, 2005 by the client (Mr. Steve Chan). This report was prepared under the assumption that there is no on- going or unresolved land use critical area violations reported or filed on the subject property. Term and Conditions which apply to this report is presented in APPENDIX G. field work, submitted data, research, and information acquired,Based uponq , seventeen (17) wetlands (Wetland A—Wetland Q) are located on the subject property that was studied. The entire footprints of eleven (11) of the 17 identifiQd wetlands are located entirely on the subject property. The remaining six (6) wetlands (Wetlands B, E, F, N, 0, & Q) are located both on and off of the subject property. The observed and evaluated characteristics, category, and determined standard buffer widths for each of the wetlands are summarized in TABLES 1A— 1Q (APPENDIX B). The wetland delineation was limited to property within the boundaries of the subject parcels identified in this report. This study did not include assessing or studying the abandoned water reservoir located contiguous to the east of the east-central part of the property or streams located beyond the boundary of the subject property. A cursory inspection was performed on suspect and/or observed wetlands located within about 200 feet from the property boundary. These suspect wetlands were not delineated, however the approximate outer edge of the wetlands were marked with flags for the survey crew. Based on this cursory inspection, four (4) off-site wetlands were observed within about 200 feet of the site. These are depicted on FIGURE 9 as Off-Site Wetland #1 — Off-Site Wetland #4. 2.0 PURPOSE The purpose for performing the work on the vested subject property was to assess and delineate wetlands and to determine wetland categories and standard buffer widths according to current jurisdictional governmental agency critical area regulations. The work was performed on land that is proposed for development into a high intensity residential development with approximately 600 single family dwellings. EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 1 I I 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work included performing the following subtasks: I ➢ Established forty seven (47) test plots in representative plant communities. D Obtained and evaluated test plot data for vegetation, soil, and hydrologic conditions. D Determined whether or not jurisdictional wetlands are located on the property. D Marked the boundary of each identified wetland with consecutively numbered flags. D Determined the class, type, category, and standard buffer width for each wetland. D Performed a cursory inspection for indications of off-site wetlands and associated buffers located within approximately 200 feet of the property boundary. D Prepared a series of figures depicting features of the site (APPENDIX A). D Prepared a photographic log (APPENDIX H). ➢ Reviewed a professionally surveyed Wetland Delineation Exhibit Map. D Prepared this report. 4.0 METHODOLOGY This report has been prepared in general accordance the City of Bremerton critical area regulations as referenced in SECTION 21.0 (REFERENCES). Reportedly this referenced document is the property's vested edition of the City's regulations which pertain to this project. Wetlands, rivers, and streams are protected by local, state, and federal laws and regulations. The Washington Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58.030) regulates shorelines and shorelines of the state. Federal law (Section 404 of the Clean Water Act) generally prohibits the discharge of dredge and/or fill material into the nation's waters, including most wetlands, without obtaining authorization and/or a permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers. Wetlands were classified according Coward — 1979. The wetland ecological classification followed the format as presented on applicable NWI maps. Field procedures followed during the field work are presented as APPENDIX D. Credentials of key individuals who prepared this report are presented as APPENDIX F. 5.0 SCHEDULE Mr. Jonathan M. Kemp, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Wetlands Biologist, of EnCo performed the field portion of the wetland delineation from November 7, 2005 through December 7, 2005. The weather conditions during the field work consisted of mostly sunny to overcast skies. The ambient air temperatures during the field work ranged from 28°F to 58°F. Estimated precipitation which fell during the duration of the field work amounted to about three inches. Recorded precipitation in the amount of about five inches have fallen in the vicinity of the subject property in the previous 2 months of the field work. EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 2 I 6.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 6.1 CURRENT AND HISTORICAL LAND USE Currently the subject property consists of undeveloped land that is occupied by several gravel logging roads (Aerial Photograph - FIGURE 3). The property is primarily occupied with a mixture of scrub shrub and forested class vegetation interspersed with riverine and palustrine wetlands in valleys, slopes, and depressions. The site is bisected by numerous wetland systems that occur in the troughs between ridge tops and steep slopes. Portions of the property have been logged in the last 5 years, I however most of the site is relatively undisturbed and supports second growth stands of mixed coniferous-deciduous forest in the non-wetland areas. Historically, the land was reportedly occupied by managed timberland and was probable originally timbered between the late 1800's and the early 1900's. Reportedly the majority of the site was logged for a second time sometime between 1950 and 1960. An existing abandoned water reservoir was reportedly constructed just east of the east-central portion of the site in 1917. The reservoir was used as a public water source until the 1960's when it was converted to a water storage facility. 6.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of a total of 203 acres of land (Kitsap County — 2005) within the jurisdiction of the City of Bremerton. The site is currently located within an Urban Growth Area. The subject property consists of two separate parcels of land as indicated below. Parcel Number Acreage Shape Length (N to 5) Width (E to W) A: 212401-3-007-2009 165.13 Irregular -3,100' -2,100' B: 292401-1-018-2002 37.5Square -1,050' 1,200' The subject property is situated in the west '/2 of the southwest quarter and the south 3/4 of southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 21 and the north 1/2 of the northwest quarter and the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 28, Township 24N, Range 01 E plus the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 29, Township 24N, Range 01E of the Willamette Meridian. The global coordinates of the approximate center portion of the subject parcels are identified as Latitude North 47° 33.1' and Longitude West 122° 41.5'. According to public records dated February 28, 2006 the subject property is zoned in a City residential district. The current owner of the parcels is identified as OPG Properties, Inc. A legal description of the subject property can be found in the documents presented in APPENDIX E. EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 3 i I I 7.0 ADJACENT PROPERTY LAND USE Improved Roadways There are no improved (impervious) roadways on the subject property. The property boundary is not located contiguous with any improved (impervious) roadway. The following public roadways are located in close proximity of the subject property boundary: West Werner Road (660 feet north), Third Street (835 feet southeast), and Sand Dollar Road (200 feet south). There are no other public roadways which lie contiguous to the site. Contiguous Property Land Use Property contiguous to the north is occupied by a City owned Public Works gravel road (NW), woodland (N) a dry-cleaning establishment (N) and a few small-sized commercial businesses (NE) located on the south side of West Werner Road. Property contiguous to the east is occupied by a City of Bremerton park (Pendergast Park -NE) and woodland (E and SE). Property contiguous to the south is occupied by woodland and a permanent stream (SE), widely scattered dwellings (S), and woodland (SW). Property contiguous to the west is occupied by undeveloped woodland. 8.0 TOPOGRAPHY, DRAINAGE, AND FLOODPLAINS Topography ' The subject property consists of 100 percent pervious surfaces. The local topography slopes from 1 percent to 70 percent downward, and trends in a general southeasterly direction. The surveyed elevation of the subject parcel ranges between 545 feet to 135 feet above mean sea level (FIGURES 4 & 9). Generally, the highest elevation is located at the west-center portion of Parcel B corner, and the lowest elevation is located at the far southeast corner of the site (Parcel A). The site has a wide variety of topographic features ranging from shallowly sloped valley floors to steeply cut ravines sloping downward from hilly ridges. Surface Water Drainage According to the local USGS topographic survey map the subject site is located in the drainage basin of an un-named stream. The un-named stream has been identified by the WDFW as ID#: 1226742475419 (a.k.a. W right Creek and Wilson Creek). The stream traverses the subject site along most of the eastern boundary and exits the site at the far southeast corner. Another unnamed tributary flows easterly into stream #1226742475419 from the west. This unnamed tributary drains the landscape from a large segment of the western and northwestern portions of the subject property. The source of surface water flowing in the waterways occurs primarily from groundwater seeps which develop at the base of steep ridges and slopes and from surface water I EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 4 I I runoff from the undulating and steep terrain within its drainage basin. Stream I #1226742475419 flows southerly into the Sinclair Inlet of Puget Sound. Floodplains IFloodplains are the low, flat, periodically flooded land located adjacent to rivers, lakes, and oceans and subject to geomorphic (land-shaping) and hydrologic (water flow) I processes. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is a semi- independent federal agency established to respond to emergencies beyond the scope of local and state resources. FEMA administers the National Flood Insurance Program I which is responsible to create the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). The FIRM maps show, based on detailed and approximate analyses, the boundaries of the 100-year and 500-year floodplains and the 100-year floodway. The maps identify the areas of I 100-year flood hazards in a community and in some cases base flood elevations and 500-year floodplain boundaries. Many areas within defined floodplains may be classified as wetlands. ISubject Property Designated flood plains were not depicted on the subject property on the local Federal ■ Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) map (FIGURE 7). I 1. The subject property is designated as being in flood Zone C. Flood Zone C includes areas of minimal flooding (no shading). IOff-Site Property Designated flood plains were not depicted on the local FEMA map within approximately 1' 300 feet from the boundary the subject property. 9.0 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGIC SETTING ISoil Series and Description kBased on interpretation from the information depicted on the County Soil Survey aerial map (FIGURE 6), the original, undisturbed, primary soil series identified at the surface and up to 60 inches below ground surface (bgs) on the subject property have been Iidentified as indicated below. The soil types are listed in alphabetic order. Information pertaining to the estimated soil types observed in the identified wetland and non- wetland test plots are presented on the field data forms. I Alderwood Very Gravell Sandy Loam — Kitsap County (2) 1 The soil type identified near the southeast portion (<5 percent) of the subject property is classified as being Alderwood Very Gravelly Sandy Loam. The Alderwood series I consists of moderately deep, moderately well drained soil on broad uplands. Slope ranges from 6 percent to 15 percent. The taxonomic class for Alderwood soils are EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 5 i loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Dystric Entic Durochrepts. This soil formed in glacial till. IAlderwood soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list. Elevation ranges from 50 feet to 550 feet above mean sea level. The average annual precipitation ranges from 40 inches to 55 inches and the average annual air temperature is about 50 degrees F. The average frost-free period is about 180 days. Typically, the surface layer is covered by a mat of undecomposed needles and wood fragments. The subsurface layer is brown very gravely sand loam 1/2 inch thick. The subsoil is brown very gravelly loam about 21 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of I 60 inches or more is grayish brown gravelly sandy loam that is weakly-silica-cemented in the upper part. Depth to the silica-cemented hardpan ranges from 20 to 40 inches. I Permeability is moderately rapid above the hardpan and very slow in the hardpan. The available water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth ranges from 20 to 40 inches. A perched water table is at a depth of 2.5 feet to 3 feet for short periods during the rainy I season in winter and spring. Water flows laterally along the top of the cemented layer and seeps at the bottom of slopes. Runoff is slow and the hazard of water erosion is slight. IThe main limitations are slope, depth to the cemented hardpan and the seasonal perched water table. In areas of moderate or high population density, onsite sewage I disposal systems often fail or do not function properly during periods of high rainfall because of these limitations. I The native vegetation is mainly conifers and hardwoods such as Douglas fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, and red alder. Common understory plants are salal, evergreen huckleberry, Oregon-grape, brackenfern, western swordfern, and Ihuckleberry. Included Soil Series e in this unit and mapped upto about 8percent of the mapunit are Indianola Included pp I and Neilton soils on side slopes. Also included and making up about 6 percent of the map unit are Kapowsin and Harstine soils and areas of Alderwood very gravelly sandy loam that have slopes of less than 6 percent. Included soils are not listed on the county Ihydric soils list. Alderwood Very Gravelly Sandy Loam — Kitsap County (3) IThe soil type identified near the southeast portion (<2 percent) of the subject property is classified as being Alderwood Very Gravelly Sandy Loam. The Alderwood series consists of moderately deep, moderately well drained soil on broad uplands. Slope ranges from 15 percent to 30 percent. The taxonomic class for Alderwood soils are loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Dystric Entic Durochrepts. This soil formed in glacial till. IAlderwood soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list. EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 Page 6 I 1 Elevation ranges from 200 feet to 800 feet above mean sea level. The average annual precipitation ranges from 40 inches to 55 inches and the average annual air temperature is about 50 degrees F. The average frost-free period is about 180 days. rTypically, the surface layer is covered by a mat of undecomposed needles and wood fragments. The subsurface layer is brown very gravelly sandy loam 1/2 inch thick. The subsoil is brown very gravelly loam about 21 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is grayish brown gravelly sandy loam that is weakly-silica-cemented in the upper part. Depth to the silica-cemented hardpan ranges from 20 to 40 inches. Permeability is moderately rapid above the hardpan and very slow in the hardpan. The available water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth ranges from 20 to 40 inches. A perched water table is at a depth of 2.5 feet to 3 feet for short periods during the rainy season in winter and spring. Water flows along the top of the cemented layer and seeps at the bottom of slopes. Runoff is medium and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. The main limitations are steep slopes for homesites. During the rainy season in winter and spring, septic effluent from on-site sewer disposal systems may seep at points further down the slope. The native vegetation is mainly conifers and hardwoods such as Douglas fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, and red alder. Common understory plants are salal, evergreen huckleberry, Oregon-grape, brackenfern, western swordfern, and huckleberry. Included Soil Series Included in this unit are Neilton, Ragnar and Indianola soils. In places, cobbles and stones are on the surface. Also included are areas of advanced glacial outwash that have a two foot capping of strongly compacted material in the substratum. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. Included soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list. Kitsap Dystric Xerorthents — y P Count Y (10) The soil type identified near the southeast portion (< 5 percent) of the subject property is classified as being Dystric Xerorthents. The Dystric Xerorthents series consists of deep, moderately well drained to somewhat excessively drained soils on sidewalls of river valleys and sidewalls of entrenched streams. Slope ranges from 45 percent to 70 percent. The taxonomic class for Dystric Xerorthents soils are unclassified Dystric Xerorthents. These soils formed mainly in glacial till, but some formed in sandy and gravelly outwash. Areas are long and narrow on the contour. Dystric Xerorthents soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list except in "wet spots". EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 7 average ranges from 0 feet to 1,200 feet above mean sea level. The a ga annual precipitation ranges from 35 inches to 70 inches and the average annual air temperature is about 50 degrees F. The average frost-free period is about 200 days. Typically, the surface layer has a mat of undecomposed needles and wood fragments over a surface layer of dark yellowish brown very gravelly sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The upper part of the underlying material is dark brown, brown, and dark yellowish brown very gravelly sandy loam about 40 inches thick. The lower part of the underlying material to a depth of 60 inches is dark grayish brown and grayish brown very gravelly sandy loam and very gravelly loamy sand. Permeability is moderate to rapid. Runoff is medium to very rapid. These soils are mainly in tree covered slump areas. The main limitation is a hazard of high erosion. The native vegetation is mainly conifers and hardwoods such as Douglas fir, red alder, and western hemlock. Common understory plants are western brackenfern, western swordfern, salal, trailing blackberry, and cascade Oregon- grape. Included Soil Series ' Included in this unit are small areas of Indianola and Kitsap soils, and beaches and escarpments that are devoid of vegetation. Also included are small areas of Kapowsin, Harstine, and Poulsbo soils that have slumped. Included soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list. Kilchis Very Gravelly Sandy Loam — Kitsap County (25) The soil type identified near the far southwest portion (<1 percent) of the subject property is classified as being Kilchis Very Gravelly Sandy Loam. The Kilchis series rconsists of shallow, well drained soil on ridge crests and side slopes. Slope ranges from 15 percent to 30 percent. The taxonomic class for Kilchis soils are loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts. These soils formed in residuum from basalt. Kilchis soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list except in "wet spots". Elevation ranges from 300 feet to 1,700 feet above mean sea level. The average annual precipitation ranges from 65 inches to 80 inches and the average annual air temperature is about 47 degrees F. The average frost-free period is about 160 days. Typically, the surface layer is dark reddish brown very gravelly sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is dark reddish brown extremely gravelly loam about 14 inches thick over fractured basalt. Depth to basalt ranges from 16 inches to 20 inches. 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 8 I Permeability is moderately rapid. The available water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth ranges from 16 inches to 20 inches. Runoff is rapid and the hazard of water ' erosion is moderate. The main limitations are slope and depth to rock for urban development. r The native vegetation is conifers such as Douglas fir and western hemlock. Common understory plants are salal, evergreen huckleberry, rhododendron, Oregon-grape, and creambush oceanspray. Included Soil Series Included in this unit are about 5 percent Schneider soils in concave pockets. At the contact line with glacial till sediment there is about 10 percent Shelton soils in concave pockets. Also included are small areas of Kilchis soils that have slopes of more than 30 percent. Included soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list. Kilchis Very Gravelly Sandy Loam — Kitsap County (26) The soil type identified near the central east and southwest corner(10 to 15 percent) portion of the subject property is classified as being Kilchis Very Gravelly Sandy Loam. The Kilchis series consists of shallow, well drained soil on ridge crests and side slopes. Slope ranges from 30 percent to 70 percent. The taxonomic class for Kilchis soils are loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts. These soils formed in residuum from basalt. Kilchis soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list except in "wet spots". Elevation ranges from 300 feet to 1,700 feet above mean sea level. The average annual precipitation ranges from 65 inches to 80 inches and the average annual air temperature is about 47 degrees F. The average frost-free period is about 160 days. Typically, the surface layer is dark reddish brown very gravelly sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is dark reddish brown extremely gravelly loam about 14 inches thick over fractured basalt. Depth to the basalt ranges from 16 inches to 20 inches. Permeability is moderately rapid. The available water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth ranges from 16 inches to 20 inches. Runoff is very rapid and the hazard of water erosion is severe. The main limitations are slope and depth to rock for urban development. The native vegetation is conifers such as Douglas fir and western hemlock. Common understory plants are salal, evergreen huckleberry, rhododendron, Oregon-grape, and creambush oceanspray. EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 9 I Included Soil Series Included in this unit and making up about 5 percent of the map unit are Schneider soils in concave pockets. Also included are small areas of Kilchis soils that have slopes of less than 30 percent. Included soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list. Kilchis-Shelton Complex — Kitsap County(27) The soil type identified on most of the subject property (70 to 80 percent) is classified as being a mixture of soil types identified as the Kilchis-Shelton Complex. The Kilchis-Shelton series are found on ridge crests, side slopes, moraines, and till plains of uplands. The Kilchis very gravely sandy loam series consists of shallow, well drained soil on ridge crests and side slopes. The Shelton very gravelly sandy loam series is moderately deep and moderately well drained on moraines and till plains. Slope ranges from 30 percent to 50 percent. The taxonomic class for Kilchis soils are loamy- skeletal, mixed, mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts and for Shelton soils are loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Dystric Entic Durochrepts. These soils formed in material weathered from basalt or glacial till. Kilchis-Shelton soils are not listed on the county hydric soils list except in "wet spots". ' Elevation ranges from 600 feet to 1,400 feet above mean sea level. The average annual precipitation ranges from 65 inches to 80 inches and the average annual air 111 temperature is about 47 degrees F. The average frost-free period is about 170 days. Typically, the surface layer for Kilchis soils is dark reddish brown very gravelly sandy I loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is dark reddish brown extremely gravelly loam about 14 inches thick over fractured basalt. Depth to the basalt ranges from 16 inches to 20 inches. Typically the surface for the Shelton soils is covered by a mat of needles, leaves, and wood fragments. The subsoil is dark reddish brown and dark brown very gravely sandy loam about 25 inches thick. The substratum is weakly silica cemented, very compact, glacial till to a depth of 60 inches or more. Depth to the cemented hardpan ranges from 23 inches to 35 inches. Permeability in the Kilchis soils is moderately rapid. The available water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth ranges from 16 inches to 20 inches. Runoff is very rapid and the hazard of water erosion is severe. Permeability in the Shelton series is rapid to the cemented hardpan and very slow in the hardpan. Available water capacity is low. iEffective rooting depth is 23 inches to 35 inches. Runoff is very rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is severe. A perched water table is at a depth of 2 feet to 3 feet during the rainy season. The main limitations are slope for urban development. p ' The native vegetation is conifers such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, and lodgepole pine. Common understory plants are salal, bracken fern, evergreen huckleberry, rhododendron, Oregon-grape, creambush oceanspray. EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 10 Included Soil Series 111 Included in this complex unit are small areas of Schneider soils and Kilchis soil that have slopes of less than 30 percent along narrow drainageways. Included soils are not rlisted on the county hydric soils list. Norma Fine Sandy Loam — Kitsap County (37) The soil type identified near the northeast portion (10 percent) of the subject property is classified as being Norma Fine Sandy Loam. The Norma series consists of deep, poorly drained soil on long, narrow stream bottoms and on till plain depressions in the uplands. Slope ranges from 0 percent to 3 percent. The taxonomic class for Norma soils are coarse-loamy, mixed, nonacid, mesic Mollic Haplaquepts. This soil formed in mixed glacial alluvium. Norma soils are listed on the county hydric soils list. Elevation ranges from 0 feet to 300 feet above mean sea level. The average annual precipitation ranges from 35 inches to 60 inches and the average annual air temperature is about 50 degrees F. The average frost-free period is about 170 days. Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish brown fine sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is distinctly mottled, light olive brown fine sandy loam about 14 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is mottled, olive gray and dark yellowish brown stratified sandy loam, clay loam, and loamy sand. Permeability is moderately rapid. The available water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is limited by a high water table. Runoff is ponded and the hazard of water erosion is slight. This soil is ponded during the winter months. The main limitations for homesites are depth to a high water table and ponding. On-site sewage systems do not function property because of wetness and ponding. The native vegetation is sedges, grasses, conifers, and hardwoods. Red alder, Douglas fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, and big leaf maple are the main woodland species on this unit. Common understory plants are trailing blackberry, western swordfern, thimbleberry, salmonberry, brackenfern, and huckleberry. Included Soil Series Included in this unit are Bellingham, McKenna and Shalcar soils. Also included are small areas that have an organic surface layer as thick as 5 inches, and small areas that have a sand substratum. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. Included Bellingham, McKenna, and Shalcar soils are listed on the county hydric soils list. 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 11 I I 10.0 PUBLISHED WETLAND MAPS I10.1 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP I The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through its National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) project have produced maps that show the location, size, and type of wetlands within defined geographical areas. The maps are produced to aid resource managers and I planners in making wise decisions regarding the fate of wetlands. The NWI maps are prepared through conventional photo interpretation techniques using mid to high altitude aerial photographs. IThe NWI maps show: (1) the location and shape of wetlands and deepwater habitats; (2) the type of wetland based on vegetation (or substrate, where vegetation is absent), I water regime, salinity (for tidal areas), and other characteristic; and (3) the type of deepwater habitat based on ecological system, hydrology (tidal/nontidal), and other features (i.e., impounded). While the NWI maps depict the location of a large number Iof wetlands and probably the ones most important to wetland dependent fish and wildlife resource and flood storage, not all wetlands are shown on the maps. In addition, many of the depicted wetlands have not been field verified for accuracy. I Subject Property 1 p Y IWetlands are depicted on the subject property on the local NWI map (FIGURE 5). Mapped NWI wetlands (if any) are discussed below and are listed in a clockwise Idirection starting from a northern compass orientation. 1. NWI-1: A PFOHh wetland is depicted near the northeast corner of the subject I property and extends off-site to the east. The wetland is associated with Wetland B. The footprint of the mapped wetland averages about 250 feet long (north to south) and averages about 400 feet wide (east to west). A PFOHh designation is classified as a palustrine, forested, permanently flooded, diked/impounded wetland. I 2. NWI-2: A PFOC wetland is depicted near the northeast corner of the subject property and most of the wetland extends off-site to the east. The wetland is associated with Wetland B. The footprint of the mapped wetland averages I about 100 feet long (north to south) and averages about 300 feet wide (east to west). A PFOC designation is classified as a palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded wetland. 1 • 3. NWI-3: A R30WH wetland is depicted along and contiguous to the east boundary of the subject property, just north of the surface water input into the I abandoned off-site water reservoir. The wetland is associated with Wetland D. The footprint of the mapped wetland averages less than 15 feet wide and extends linearly north of the northern most boundary of the abandoned reservoir. I EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 12 I A R30WH designation is classified as riverine, upper perennial, open water, permanently flooded wetland. 4. NWI-4: A R30WH wetland is depicted along and contiguous to the east boundary of the subject property, just south of the surface water output out of the abandoned off-site water reservoir. The wetland is associated with Wetland F. The footprint of the mapped wetland averages less than 15 feet wide and extends linearly south of the southern most boundary of the abandoned reservoir. A R30WH designation is classified as riverine, upper perennial, open water, permanently flooded wetland. 5. NWI-5: A PSSC wetland is depicted on the southwest portion of the subject property. The wetland is associated with Wetland P. The footprint of the I mapped wetland averages about 280 feet long (north to south) and averages about 150 feet wide (east to west). A PSSC designation is classified as palustrine, scrub-shrub, and seasonally flooded wetland. Off-Site Property ' Wetlands are depicted on the local NWI map (FIGURE 5) within approximately 300 feet from the subject property boundary. Mapped off-site NWI wetlands (if any) are discussed below and are listed in a clockwise direction starting from a northern ' compass orientation. 1. NW-6: A PFOC wetland is depicted about 200 feet north of the north-central property boundary. The wetland may be associated with off-site Wetland 3. The footprint of the mapped wetland averages about 100 feet long (north to south) and averages about 400 feet wide (east to west). A PFOC designation is classified as a palustrine, forested, seasonally flooded wetland. 2. NWI-7: A POWHh wetland is depicted off-site and contiguous to the east-central portion of the subject property's east boundary. The wetland is associated with the abandoned water reservoir. The footprint of the mapped wetland averages about 350 feet long (north to south) and averages about 200 feet wide (east to west). A POWHh designation is classified as a palustrine, open water, permanently flooded, diked/impounded wetland. 10.2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY WETLAND INVENTORY MAP Many municipalities and counties have created inventories of known or suspect wetlands within their jurisdictional boundaries. Many of these inventoried wetlands are based on a cursory review of aerial photographs, soil survey maps, flood plain maps, topographic maps, national wetland inventory maps, stream and river maps, priority habitat maps, and other sources. In some cases the inventoried wetlands and habitats have been field verified and in other cases they have not been field verified. At this time it is not known if the government has field verified the inventoried wetlands and habitats on or near the subject property. EnCo Environmental Corporation ' Page 13 I Subject Property Wetlands are depicted on the subject property (blue boundary line) on the local government agency wetland inventory map (FIGURE 8). Mapped local government agency wetlands are discussed below and are listed in a clockwise direction starting from a northern compass orientation. 1 1. A local government agency identified wetland is depicted near the northeast corner of the subject property and extends off-site to the east. The wetland is associated L with Wetland B and two NWI wetlands (NWI-1 and NWI-2). The footprint of the mapped wetland averages about 770 feet long (north to south) and averages about 175 feet wide (east to west). 1 2. A local government agency identified wetland is depicted on the southwest portion of the subject property. The wetland is associated with Wetland P and one NWI wetland (NW-5). The footprint of the mapped wetland averages about 280 feet long (north to south) and averages about 150 feet wide (east to west). 1 Off-Site Property Wetlands are depicted (blue boundary line) on the local government agency wetland 1 inventory map within approximately 300 feet from the boundary of the subject property. Mapped off-site local government agency wetlands are discussed below and are listed in a clockwise direction starting from a northern compass orientation. 1. A localgovernment agency identified wetland is depicted about 200 feet north of 9 Y P the north-central property boundary. The wetland may be associated with off-site 1 Wetland 3 and one NWI wetland (NW-6). The footprint of the mapped wetland averages about 100 feet long (north to south) and averages about 400 feet wide (east to west). 2. A localgovernment agency identified wetland is depicted off-site and contiguous to 9 Y P 9 the east-central portion of the subject property's east boundary. The wetland is associated with the abandoned water reservoir and one NWI wetland (NW-7). The footprint of the mapped wetland averages about 350 feet long (north to south) and 1 averages about 200 feet wide (east to west). 11.0 WETLAND DELINEATION DATA 11.1 WETLAND DEFINITION 1 Wetlands are lands where the extent of duration of saturation with water is the primary factor determining the nature of soil development and the types of plant and animal communities living in the soil and on its surface (Cowardin — 1979). Wetlands are generally defined within land use regulations as being "areas that are inundated or ■ EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 14 1 I saturated bysurface orgroundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, q Y PP and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions" (Corps of Engineers Manual — 1987). Wetlands generally exhibit three essential characteristics; hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology. In most cases all three characteristics need to be present for an area to meet the regulatory wetland criteria. 1 11.2 NORMAL, DISTURBED, AND PROBLEM AREAS 11.2.1 NORMAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Normal environmental conditions are defined as areas which do not presently lack hydrophytic vegetation or hydrologic indicators due to temperature fluctuations and/or annual, seasonal, or longterm fluctuations in precipitation, surface water, or ground water levels. Normal environmental conditions identified on the subject property (if any) are presented in TABLE 2. 11.2.2 SIGNIFICANTLY DISTURBED (ATYPICAL) AREAS Significantly disturbed (atypical) is defined as an area where vegetation, soil, and/or hydrology have been significantly altered, thereby making a wetland determination more difficult. Altered sites can include deposition of dredge or fill material, presence of non-woody debris at the surface, scarifying, excavation, subsurface plowing, logging, clear cutting, removal of surface layers, man-made structures, heavy grazing by farm animals, ditches, artificial drainage (i.e. tiles), among others. Significantly disturbed areas identified on the subject property (if any) are presented in TABLE 2. 1 11.2.3 PROBLEMATIC AREAS Problematic areas are defined as areas that are difficult to identify as wetlands because it may lack indicators of wetland hydrology and/or hydric soils, or its dominant plant species are more common in nonwetlands. These types of wetlands are considered problem areas and not significantly disturbed wetlands, because the difficulty in identification is generally due to normal environmental conditions and not the result of human activities or catastrophic natural events, with the exception of newly created wetlands. In some cases, according to the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers delineation manual, a plant community with less than 50 percent of the dominant species represented by facultative (FAC) or wetter species may still be considered a jurisdictional wetland. If an area has hydric soil and wetland hydrology is present or indicated then the plant community is hydrophytic and the area is termed a "problem area" wetland. Problematic areas identified at all the test plots on the subject property (if any) are presented in TABLE 2. EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 15 I I TABLE 2 Normal Environmental Conditions, Atypical, and Problematic Areas Test Plot# Normal Environmental Significantly Disturbed Problematic Conditions (Atypical) 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Yes No No 10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 2, 4, 12, 13, 14, Yes Yes No 15, 29, 30, 32, 34, 39 Wetland test plots are in BOLD text 11.3 WETLAND BOUNDARY IDENTIFICATION According to the WADOE rating manual the footprint of certain wetlands can be divided into smaller "units" prior to rating. The types of environmental conditions where wetlands can be separated into smaller"units" are explained in the referenced WADOE rating manual used for this study. IWetlands with Boundary Confined to the Subject Property The perimeters of eleven Wetlands A, C, D, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, and P are confined within the boundaryof the property (FIGURE 9 . These wetlands were not P p Y ) subject subdivided into smaller "units" for determining the Category. The actual size of each wetland is presented in TABLE 1. The size of each wetland was determined by calculating the area after professionally surveying in the wetland boundary flags placed on the subject property. Wetlands with Boundary not Confined to the Subject Property The perimeters of six Wetlands B, E, F, N, 0, and Q are not confined within the boundaryof the property (FIGURE 9 . These wetlands were subdivided into subjectP p Y ) smaller "units" for determining the Category. The estimated size of each wetland is presented in TABLE 1. The size of each wetland was determined by estimating the area as explained below. I EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 16 r Wetland B The entire area of this wetland was determined by professionally surveying in the boundary flags placed both on and off of the subject property. The wetland was rated by using the entire footprint of the wetland. Wetland E 1 The entire area of this wetland was determined by professionally surveying in the boundary flags placed both on and off of the subject property. The wetland was rated 1 by using the entire footprint of the wetland. Wetland F The area of this wetland was estimated by summing the area as determined by professionally surveying in the wetland boundary flags placed on the subject property to 1 the estimated area of the remaining portion of the identified NWI R30W H wetland associated with Wetland F. The wetland was rated from a point contiguous to the east end of Stream 9, south of the south end of Stream 4, and south to where the NW I R30WH wetland enters into the NWI POWHh wetland located off-site and contiguous to Sinclair Inlet. 1 Wetland N The area of this wetland was estimated by summing the area as determined by professionally surveying in the wetland boundary flags placed on the subject property to the estimated area of the remaining portion of the wetland which appeared to extend about 150 feet north of the north property boundary. Wetland 0 The entire area of this wetland was determined by professionally surveying in the boundary flags placed both on and off of the subject property. The wetland was rated by using the entire footprint of the wetland. Wetland Q The area of this wetland was estimated bysummingthe area as determined by professionally surveying in the wetland boundary flags placed on the subject property to the estimated area of the remaining portion of the wetland which appeared to extend ' south to the NW I PSSC off-site wetland located about 1,300 feet southwest of the south property boundary contiguous to Wetland Q. I EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 17 I 1 11.4 VEGETATION Dominant Hydrophytic Vegetation Identified in Wetland Communities TABLE 3 identifies dominant hydrophytic vegetation species in all of the studied wetland test plots with indicator status OBL, FACW+, FACW, FACW, FAC+, and/or FAC. TABLE 3 Dominant Hydrophytic Vegetation Species Identified in Wetland Plots Test Plots Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Indicator I Status All wetland See Field Data Forms test plots in APPENDIX C Dominant Vegetation Species Identified in Non-Wetland Communities Dominant vegetation (hydrophytic and non-hydrophytic) species observed in non- wetlands (uplands) located in the vicinity of the identified wetland and in the non- wetland test plots are summarized in TABLE 4. Dominant hydrophytic plants were identified in many non-wetland communities, however all three wetland criteria were not met in these areas. TABLE 4 Dominant Vegetation Species Identified in Non-Wetland Areas Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Indicator Status All non-wetland test plots See Field Data Forms in APPENDIX C 11.5 SOIL 11.5.1 SOIL INDICATORS Hydric soil indicators (V) identified in the studied wetland test plots are summarized in TABLE 5. 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 18 I I ITABLE 5 Hydric Soil Indicators Identified in Wetland Plots I _ 0 c x r o = o c •_ U) 1 U O 0 A• p a' 0 E o I z — w U ai0 c C 0) u) CL Jv'F- 0 u V K K ,C 2 L I iiiW N N �= d d F- 2 2 Cl) a re w V a 3 I 0 1 B V V V V 1 2 4 V V 7 E V V V I8 G J Ni V V 10 Q J 16 1 V J J V V I 17 L J J J V J 18 N J J J V J I 21 M J J V V V 22 K V V J I 23 K J J J J V V 27 ,1 V V V J 30 D V V V 1 33 0 J J V V 35 Q J J V V 1 38 P V V V 40 2 J J J V 42 B J J J J V V I 43 B J J J J V V 44 A J J J J J V J I 45 C J J J V V 46 H J J V J 47 F J J V V I11.5.2 SUBSTRATE CHARACTERISTICS IThe primary soil type (V) observed in the near surface (within 12 inches bgs) in the wetland test plots are presented in TABLE 6. Additional information pertaining to the I observed substrate is presented in the Field Data Forms (APPENDIX C). EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 19 I 1 ITABLE 6 Soil Characteristics Observed in Wetland Plots (<12" bqs) I a 4t = � E a J V 2 —1 ?+ 0 >, 3 3 C) >, i >, (Ts m >, as co W = m m > >0 > - a) Z. vs c d L vs 1 M a a 2 M M to v) v) v) 'u. M C v) 0 IiB J J J J 2 4 J J J 7 E V J I 8 G J J 10 Q J J I 16 I J J J 17 L J J 18 N J V I 21 M J J J 22 K V J 1 23 K J J J 27 J J J 30 D J J 1 33 O V Al V 35 Q J J I 38 P J J 40 2 J J J I 42 B J J J 43 B J V 44 A J V I 45 C J V 46 H V J J I47 F V 11.5.3 PENETRATION RESISTANCE ISoils were field tested at selected test plots with a Dickey— John soil compaction tester (penetrometer) within 24 inches bgs. Soil compaction levels were used to help Idetermine the water regime, soil texture layers, human interference (i.e. compaction EnCo Environmental Corporation I Page 20 I from vehicle use), or animal use (i.e. compaction due to farm animals, animal p 1 pathways). Soil resistance levels were taken at approximate three inch intervals from 3 inches bgs to as much as 24 inches bgs. I According to researched sources (Penn State — 2002) soil resistance levels which exceed 150 pounds per square inch (psi) decreases root penetration by approximately 50 percent. Almost no roots penetrate into soil with a penetration resistance greater I than 300 psi. This is reportedly true in both wet and dry soils and is usually independent of soil texture. Penetration resistance levels observed in selected wetland plots are summarized in TABLE 7. 1 TABLE 7 Penetration Resistance (psi) in Wetland Test Plot Soils ITEST WETLAND 3" 6" 9" 12" 15" 18" 21" 24" PLOT # 1 # 1 B 20 50 60 80 95 80 105 275 2 4 35 30 40 70 60 40 160 140 I7 E 20 30 30 90 80 75 95 125 8 G <10 <10 <10 40 60 160 >320 I 10 16 Q 30 40 110 170 215 175 180 100 I 30 140 140 150 200 280 240 >320 17 L 40 75 50 20 15 60 70 145 I 18 N <10 <10 15 70 120 270 180 205 21 M 20 125 185 270 215 260 275 280 22 K <10 <10 20 55 50 50 90 120 I23 K 15 15 35 140 >320 27 J 20 30 85 50 40 35 65 65 I 30 33 D 60 100 140 180 180 >320 0 20 50 80 120 150 >320 35 Q 10 10 10 10 15 40 90 100 I 38 P 25 45 30 40 100 80 90 100 40 2 25 20 30 50 100 235 300 300 42 B 15 140 120 120 210 >320 I 43 B 25 20 10 10 20 20 10 20 44 A <10 <10 25 60 75 40 25 40 45 C 1 46 H 47 F IBased on the instrument readings, soil penetration resistance levels (>150 psi) at varying depths in the upper 12 inches of soil were observed in Wetland Q, I, M, and ID. Readings over 150 psi can significantly limit root penetration by at least 50 percent EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 21 r according to literature sources. Penetration readings which exceeded 150 psi are presented in BOLD text in the table. The less compacted (<150 psi) organic or organic- mineral soil in the upper 12 inches of soil function to maintain root penetration and help retain moisture in the wetlands for extended periods of time. 11.6 WETLAND HYDROLOGY In general, wetland hydrology could be present if soils were saturated within the majority of the rooting zone for a least five percent of the growing season (sufficient to produce anaerobic conditions). It should be noted, however, that areas having saturation to the surface between five and twelve percent of the growing season may or 1 may not be wetland. Depending on soil type and drainage characteristics, saturation to the surface would generally occur if water tables were shallower than about eighteen inches below the ground surface during this time period. ' 11.6.1 WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS ' Wetland hydrology indicators (J) identified in the studied wetlands test plots are summarized in TABLE 8. This is left blank 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 Page 22 I I TABLE 8 i Wetland Hydrology Indicators Identified in Wetland Plots IC N N N O N O d C d d > r C V ca O E O r co W Q r C I 4t 0 4- k V It O L N 3d O d >, 0 0 .3 C . fNV OQ -0 'a O co l0 O Nd OL C Crtr 0 ,O '13, xi ..i rrnd2 =. 0mwNE3cno dC I J ` C L C J L d To 6- 0 L tN p cn t > $ cor. Nr 'a ww O co ied G CO10 UO X1-- _ cnEc a < a3ci) 320i 1 1 B J J J J J J J J Ni 2 4 J J J J J J J J J J J 1 7 E V V J J J J J J 8 G ,/ V J J J J J J 10 Q J J J J J 1 16 1 V V J J J J 17 L J V V V V V V V I 18 N J J J J J J 21 M V V J J J J 22 K J J J J V I 23 K J J J J J J 27 J V V V V V I 30 D J J V V 33 O J J VVVVV • 35 Q V V V J J J J I 38 P V J J V 40 2 J J V J J J J I 42 B J J J J J J J 43 B J J J J J J 44 A V V J J J J I 45 C V V J J J J 46 H J J V J J J J 1 47 F V V V J J J V V V V I I EnCo Environmental Corporation IPage 23 r 11.6.2 WATER INPUT Water input into the identified wetlands is supported by: ' • Precipitation falling directly within the footprint of the wetlands. I . Surface water runoff flowing into the wetlands from the identified ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial streams. Several metal and PVC culverts exist beneath the exiting logging and property access roads as depicted on FIGURE 9. • Surface water runoff flowing in the wetlands via moderate and very steep sloped ' drainage courses and ravines observed in non-wetland areas located contiguous to the wetlands. Surface water was not flowing through many of the ephemeral and intermittent drainage ways at the time of the filed work. Water was flowing in the main intermittent stream traversing in a west to east direction. ■ Groundwater seeps from at the toe of upgradient undulating hills, steep slopes, and ravines located contiguous to the wetlands. ■ Groundwater recharge and surface water flow into Wetlands B, N, and Q from ' the off-site portion of the wetlands. I . High water levels in the pond at Wetland B due primarily to the beaver dam located at the south edge. 11.6.3 WATER OUTPUT Water output in the identified wetlands is supported by: ' • Surface water runoff flowing into and through unconstricted metal and PVC culverts which pass beneath many of the existing logging and property access ' roads. ■ Surface water runoff flowing through the unconstricted downgradient moderately to steeply sloped drainage courses. • Surface water runoff flowing through the unconstricted downgradient ephemeral, ' intermittent, and permanently flowing streams. Surface water was not flowing through many of the ephemeral and intermittent drainage ways at the time of the filed work. ' ■ Surface water runoff flowinginto and through the unconstricted man-made ditch 9 located near the east-central portion of the site. EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 24 • Surface water and groundwater seepageinto wetlandslocated downgradient of the pond at Wetland B due to the beaver dam located at the south edge. 1 • Groundwater migration in general downgradient easterly and southeasterly directions. • Percolation. • Passive infiltration. • Evaporation. • Transpiration. 1 11.7 RATIONAL FOR DETERMINING WETLANDS Wetland boundaries were established based on the presence of hydric soil, hydrophytic vegetation, and indicators of wetland hydrology. Topographic changes within the context of the landscape were also used to aid in the placement of the flags along the wetland edge. Centerlines or the ordinary high water mark of streams were identified and marked with a different color flag that was used for the wetland delineation. 11.8 RATIONAL FOR DETERMINING NON-WETLANDS rSeveral plant community test plots were determined to be non-wetland (upland) areas. A summary of the rational for making the non-wetland determination for these plotted ' communities is presented in TABLE 9. The locations of these test plots are depicted on FIGURE 9 and detailed information pertaining to the determination is presented on the Field Data Forms (APPENDIX C). This is left blank r r r r r r EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 25 r I I TABLE 9 IRational for Determining Non-Wetlands Non-Wetland Hydrophytic Hydric Soil Wetland I Test Plot# Vegetation Indicators Hydrology 4 No Yes Yes 5 Yes No No 1 6 Yes No No 9 Yes No No Yes No No Iii 12 Yes No Yes 13 Yes No No I 14 Yes No No 15 Yes Yes No 19 Yes No Yes I 20 Yes Yes Yes No 24 Yes No 25 Yes Yes No I 26 Yes No No 28 Yes No No 29 Yes No No I31 Yes No No 32 Yes No No 34 Yes No No 36 Yes Yes No 37 Yes No No I 39 Yes No No 41 Yes No No I11.9 WILDLIFE The site and surrounding lands provide habitat for native wildlife species common to second growth coniferous and deciduous forests and successional shrub lands of the IPuget Sound area. 11.9.1 MAMMALS I Most mammals generally exhibit secretive habits and are difficult to observe without I performing detailed field surveys which may include intrusive work such as setting traps for visual identification. In addition, many mammals are nocturnal and are not very active during daylight hours. IMammals that were physically observed while in the field included rabbit, Black-tailed deer, raccoon, eastern gray squirrel, chipmunk, field mice, and small rodents. These I EnCo Environmental Corporation I Page 26 animals w re observed in non-wetland and wetland areas. Mammals were observed were ton the ground, in thickets, and on branches of trees and shrubs. Field indicators for mammals, not physically seen, included beaver, mountain beaver, ' raccoon, moles, and shrews. Field indicators for mammals included observing the beaver dam located at the south edge of Wetland B, raccoon tracks in alluvium (stream bed) soils, and burrows and soil mounds dug by moles and shrews in non-wetland areas. Numerous pellet mounds from Black-tailed deer were observed particularly in matted animal pathways in forested areas. Coyotes and black bear were reportedly observed by others on property located contiguous to the west of the subject property according to interviews with several local individuals. These individuals were interviewed while walking their dogs on the logging trails. A variety of other species could be expected to occur in habitats such as those found on the subject property. 11.9.2 BIRDS Most birds generally exhibit secretive habits and are difficult to observe without ' performing detailed field surveys which may include intrusive work such as constructing blinds for visual identification. Birds that were physically observed while in the field included roughed grouse, pheasant, chickadee, wren, song sparrow, robin, mallard duck, sea gull, blue jay, crow and unidentified song birds. These animals were observed in non-wetland and wetland areas. Birds were observed in the air, on the branches of trees, shrubs, and herbs and on the ground. Most of the smaller variety birds were observed in thickets of berry- producing shrubs such as thimble berry, black berry, and ever green huckleberry. These bird varieties were also observed in water borne areas congested with flying and water loving insects and in low, damp areas populated with worms and crawling insects. ' Larger birds such as sea gulls and crow were observed flying over head in open areas (i.e. clear cuts and on ridges). Field indicators for birds, not physically seen, included woodpecker. Field indicators for birds included observing snags with pecking holes used by woodpeckers in inundated areas within Wetland B. Observed bird remains included feathers and bones in and near the wetlands. Raptor nests were not observed on the studied segments of the subject property. A variety of other species such as warblers, flycatchers, vireos, kinglets, juncos, and other song birds could be expected to occur in habitats such as those found on the subject property. EnCo Environmental Corporation 111Page 27 11.9.3 AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES The distribution and habitat use for amphibians and reptiles is not as well known as compared to those of other vertebrate species in the Pacific Northwest. Many ' amphibians rely on wetlands and streams for breeding habitat. Several species are known to breed in fallen logs and duff in forested areas and are active feeders in forest communities during wet weather periods. ' Most species of this group are very secretive and can be seen only during short periods of their life cycles. Surveys for such species require special techniques to adequately inventory these creatures. No reptiles or amphibians were observed. A variety of species such as salamanders, toads, frogs, and snakes could be expected to occur in habitats such as those found on the subject property. 11.9.4 MOLLUSKS Fresh water snails were observed in the perennial stream identified on the site. ' 11.10 FISH ' Fish populations were not observed in flowing streams during the site work for this project. ' 12.0 PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES ' 12.1 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES The Washington Department of Natural Resources (WADNR) provides, for a nominal ' fee, information on rare or priority vascular plants and high quality native wetland and/or terrestrial ecosystems in the vicinity of the Section, Township, and Range of the subject property. The information provided by the WADNR Natural Heritage Program is based solely on existing information in the Natural Heritage Information System database. The results of the WADNR Natural Heritage Program data base search (APPENDIX E) ' within approximately 330 feet of the subject property within the requested Section, Township, and Range are presented in TABLE 10. 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 28 1 TABLE 10 WADNR Natural Heritage Program — Database Search Results Component Status Reference to Site High Quality Native Wetlands None >330' High Quality Terrestrial Ecosystems None >330' Priority Plants None >330' Rare Plants None >330' The closest boundary of a component on the WADNR rare or priority plants or high ' quality native ecosystems report was not identified in their report. The WADNR may restrict the uses and activities or may require mitigation measures for a proposed ' development within a certain distance (generally 330 feet but in some cases up to 1,000 feet) of a priority habitat or species location component. Usually priority habitat and species buffers are established on a case-by-case basis. 12.2 WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) provides, for a nominal fee, information on priority habitats and animal species in the vicinity of the Section, Township, and Range of the subject property. The information provided by the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species Program is based solely on existing information in the Priority Habitats and Species System database. Priority species may include endangered, threatened, sensitive, candidate, monitored, or game species. These species need protection because of their population status and sensitivity to habitat alteration. The results of the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species Program data base search (APPENDIX E) within approximately 330 feet of the subject property within the requested Section, Township, and Range are summarized in TABLE 11. The Priority ' Habitat and Species map is presented as FIGURE 11. This is left blank 1 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation ' Page 29 TABLE 11 WDFW Priority Habitats & Species Program — Database Search Results Element Map Id Code Reference to Site Priority Habitats Black line/#+2 Unknown/not mapped Priority Species Black line/#+2 Unknown/not mapped Priority Wildlife Heritage 2 purple circles >330' Priority Birds Red/green star >330' Priority Anadromous Fish Presence Red squares >330' Priority Resident Fish Presence Green dots On-site: Stream south of ' 1. Resident Cutthroat (CCT) abandoned reservoir 2. Fall Chum (CHMF) Off-site: >300' Other Wildlife Heritage Points Pink circle >330' Oysters, Clams, Geoducks None >330' NWI Wetland Inventory Green shaded On-site: NWI-1, NWI-2, & NWI-5 ' Off-site: NWI-6 ' Subject Property Based on review of the WDFW Priority Species & Habitats map and report, there is no ' documented occurrence of any priority animal species (state endangered, threatened, sensitive, candidate, or monitor) on the site with the exception of 1.) priority resident fish presence, and 2.) unknown presence of priority habitats and species. The map shows three on-site wetland areas from the USFWS NWI map. Based on reports prepared by other professional consultants (Raedeke Associates, Inc. ' 1997), it appears unlikely that the upper portions of the on-site streams are accessible to salmonid fish. The Raedeke report indicated that on-site streams had no documented use by salmon in the upper reaches due to impassable cascades located ' off-site near the stream's outlet into Sinclair Inlet. During storm events or other periods of high water flows the lower and middle reaches of stream #1226742475419 may be accessible to chum and coho salmon (not confirmed). ' This unknown presence of priority habitats and species (ID +2) labeled just west of stream #1226742475419 corresponds to the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species ' Program map identification code #900000. A WDFW identification code #900000 indicates that the presence of a Priority Habitat Species is unknown or the area was not mapped. During the month of field work priority wildlife or fish species and/or raptor ' nests were not observed on the subject property. Off-Site Property ' The closest boundary of a documented occurrence of any priority animal species (state endangered, threatened, sensitive, candidate, or monitor) on property located contiguous to the subject site on the WDFW Habitat and Species Map were not EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 30 feet from the property boundary. The mapshows one off- site wetland area from the USFWS NWI map. The WDFW may restrict the uses and activities or may require mitigation measures for a proposed development within a certain distance (generally 330 feet but in some cases up to 1,000 feet) of a priority habitat or species location. Usually priority habitat and species buffers are established on a case-by-case basis. ' 13.0 WETLAND CATEGORIES AND BUFFERS ' 13.1 WETLAND CATEGORIES The categories determined for the identified wetlands are based on the size, functions, values, and special characteristics. Wetlands were classified in accordance with criteria established by the referenced WADOE Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington. WADOE Wetland Categories — October 1991 (Publication #91-57) Category 9 rY These wetlands are the "cream of the crop". Generally, these wetlands are not common and would make up a small percentage of the wetlands in the state. These are wetlands that: 1) are very valuable for a particular rare species; 2) represent a high quality example of a rare wetland type; 3) are rare within a given region; or, 4) provide irreplaceable functions and values i.e. they are impossible to replace within a human lifetime, if at all. We cannot afford the risk of any degradation to these wetlands. Category I wetlands are: (i) Documented habitat recognized by federal or state agencies for threatened or endangered plant (or potentially extirpated plant), animal, or fish species, or (ii) Documented Natural Heritage wetland sites or high quality native wetland communities which qualify as Natural Heritage wetland sites; or (iii) Documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or national significance for migratory birds; or 111 (iv) Regionally rare native wetland communities; or (v) Wetlands with irreplaceable ecological functions; or (vi) Documented wetlands of local significance Category II ' These wetlands are those that: 1) provide habitat for very sensitive or important wildlife or plants; 2) are either difficult to replace; or 3) provide very high functions and values, particularly for wildlife habitat. These wetlands occur more commonly than Category I • wetlands and need a high level of protection. EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 31 Category II wetlands satisfy no Category I criteria, and are: (i) Documented habitat recognized by federal or state agencies for sensitive plant, animal, or fish species; or i (ii) Documented priority species or habitats recognized by state agencies; or (iii) Wetlands with significant functions which may not be adequately replicated through creation or restoration; or (iv) Wetlands with significant habitat value of 22 or more points; or (v) Documented wetlands of local significance. Category III These wetlands provide important functions and values. They are important for a variety of wildlife species and occur more commonly throughout the state than either Category I or II wetlands. Generally these wetlands will be smaller, less diverse and/or more isolated than Category II wetlands. They will occur most frequently, be difficult to replace, and need a moderate level of protection. Category III wetlands satisfy no Category I, II or IV criteria and are: (i) Wetlands with significant habitat value of 21 points or less; or (ii) Documented wetlands of local significance. Category IV 111 These wetlands are those that are smaller, isolated and have less diverse vegetation. These are wetlands that we should be able to replace, and in some cases be able to improve on from a habitat standpoint. However, we know that replacement can not be guaranteed in any specific case. These wetlands do provide important functions and values. In some areas, for example islands, these wetlands may be providing important tgroundwater recharge and water pollution prevention functions, and therefore may be more important from a local point of view. They may also be providing important flood storage capacity, and therefore be important in reducing both the extent and frequency of flood events. Thus, regional differences may call for a more narrow definition of this category. rCategory IV wetlands satisfy no Category I, II or III criteria, and are: ' (i) Wetlands less than 1 acre and, hydrologically isolated and, comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% areal cover) by one species from the list in Table 6 in the referenced document; or 1 (ii) Wetlands less than two acres and, hydrologically isolated, with one vegetated class, and >90% of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in Table 7 in the referenced document. 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation ' Page 32 1 City of Bremerton Wetland Categories — Ordinance #4476 - 7/13/94 IType I wetlands are wetlands categorized as meeting one of the following: I a. Documented habitat recognized by federal or state agencies for threatened or endangered species of plant or possibly extinct or extirpated plant, animal or fish; b. Documented high-quality Natural Heritage wetland sites or high-quality native I wetland communities which qualify as a Natural Heritage wetland site; c. Documented habitat of regional (Pacific coast) or national significance for migratory birds; Id. Regionally rare wetland communities with irreplaceable ecological functions, including, but not limited to, sphagnum bogs and fens, estuarine wetlands, or mature forested swamps; or I e. Wetlands of exceptional local significance. The criteria for identifying these wetlands may include, but not be limited to, rarity, groundwater recharge areas, significant habitats, unique educational sites, or area where plant associations of • infrequent occurrence such as high and low salt marsh systems, bogs or coniferous forested wetlands occurring on organic soils. I Type II wetlands are categorized as meeting one of the following: a. Documented habitat for sensitive species of plant, animal or fish recognized by federal of state agencies; I b. Wetlands with documented priority habitats or species recognized by state agencies; 1 c. Wetlands with significant functions which may not be adequately replicated through creation or restoration; or d. Regulated wetlands with significant habitat value based on diversity and size; or I e. Regulated wetlands contiguous with salmonid fish-bearing waters, including streams where flow is intermittent; or f. Regulated wetlands with significant use by fish and wildlife; or I g. Wetlands equal to or greater than one acre in size and having three or more wetland classes; or IType III wetlands are defined as those wetlands that do not contain features outlined in Type I, II or IV. IType IV wetlands are defined as those hydrologically isolated wetlands that do not meet the criteria of a Type I or Type II wetland and are: Ia. Equal to or less than one acre in size, have only one wetland class and have only one dominant plant species (monotypic vegetation) or I b. Equal to or less than two acres in size, have only one wetland class and a predominance of exotic species. 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 33 1 I Wetland Subject PropertyCategories IAccording to the referenced City Code and WADOE Wetland Rating System the identified wetlands are categorically rated as presented in TABLES 1A— 1 Q I (APPENDIX B). 13.2 WETLAND BUFFERS I The buffer zone serves as a protected link between a critical area such as wetlands, streams, priority habitats and priority species and its associative upland areas. The buffer zone is an integral part of the habitat ecosystem. The standard buffer width determined for the identified wetlands are based on the size, wetland category, functions, and special characteristics of the wetlands, in addition to I the proposed land use as specified in the jurisdictional governmental agency Critical Area Ordinance. Wetland buffer widths are measured perpendicular to the wetland boundary. INatural Heritage Wetlands, Bogs, Coastal Lagoons, Interdunal, and Mature and Old Growth Forested Wetlands (not applicable to this site) shall have the buffers Iestablished in the jurisdictional authority and such buffers are independent of the points scored in the WADOE wetland rating system. ICity of Bremerton Wetland Buffers — Ordinance #4476 - 7/13/94 I Buffer widths for wetlands may be modified by averaging, reducing, reducing with mitigation, reducing with enhancement, increasing, or modifying based on regulatory approved variances, sliding scales, and/or open space credits. In no instances shall the buffer width for a jurisdictional wetland be reduced to less than 25 feet. Jurisdictional I9wetland standard buffers based on wetland category are presented below. rY IWetland Category Standard Buffer Width Category I 200' ICategory II 100' ICategory III 50' Category IV 25' ISmall-Sized Wetlands N/A Buffer Width Modifications The applicant may modify wetland buffer standard widths according to thresholds Iallowed by regulation. If the applicant wishes to modify wetland buffer standard widths EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 34 1 I beyond the thresholds allowed by regulation then the applicant can apply for a Reasonable or Conditional Use Permit. Modifying wetland buffer widths beyond the allowed thresholds will more than likely require additional studies, enhancements, mitigation, and long term monitoring. Specific buffer requirement criteria depend on the current or proposed future land use activity and/or intensity for any proposed development. If an applicant for a development proposal demonstrates to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional governmental agency that application of the wetland standards would deny all reasonable economic use of the property, then the proposed development (with conditions) may be allowed. Activities allowed in wetland buffers are specified in the jurisdictional governmental agency wetland regulations. Examples of activities usually allowed in buffers are those which have a minimal adverse impact on buffers and wetlands such as low intensity passive recreational activities. Low intensity activities may also include pervious trails, nonpermanent wildlife watching blinds, short term scientific or education activities, and sports fishing or hunting. Construction of stormwater management facilities having no reasonable alternative on-site location or if the development itself has no feasible alternative location may be allowed in wetland buffers (depends on wetland categories). Jurisdictional wetland buffer width modifications are based on wetland category and size. A summary of the allowed buffer width modifications are presented below. On-Site Wetland Buffers According to the referenced City of Bremerton Critical Area Ordinance, the determined standard buffer widths and allowed buffer width modifications for the identified wetlands are presented in TABLES 1A- 1Q (APPENDIX B). 14.0 SHORELINES Shorelines Shorelines are defined in the Washington Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58.030). Shorelines of the State are the total of all "Shorelines" and "Shorelines of Statewide Significance" within the state of Washington. Governmental entities may include in their master program land necessary for buffers for critical areas, as defined in Washington State Chapter 36.70A RCW that occur within shorelines of the state. Shorelines are those lands extending landward for 200 feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high-water mark, 100 year floodway and contiguous floodplain areas landward 200 feet from such floodways, and all wetland and river deltas associated with the stream, lakes, and tidal waters. Shorelines means all of the water areas of the sate, including reservoirs, and their associated shorelands, together with the lands underlying them; except (i) shorelines of EnCo Environmental Corporation iPage 35 I statewide significance; (ii) shorelines on segments of streams upstream of a point where the mean annual flow is 20 cubic feet per second or less and the wetlands associated with such upstream segments; and (iii) shorelines on lakes less than 20 acres in size and wetlands associated with such small lakes. Shorelines of Statewide Significance 1 "Shorelines of Statewide Significance" means the shorelines of the state associated with those areas of Puget Sound and adjacent salt waters and the Strait of Juan de Fuca between the ordinary high water mark and the line of extreme low tide as defined in RCW 90.58.030 (2) (e). Subject Property Shorelines and Shorelines of Statewide Significance were not depicted on the subject parcel as depicted on the State Water Type map (FIGURE 10). Off-Site Property Shorelines and Shorelines of Statewide Significance were not depicted on off-site property as shown on the State Water Type map (FIGURE 10). 15.0 STREAM CATEGORIES AND BUFFERS 15.1 STREAM TYPES WADNR Stream Types Streams and rivers are classified under the WADNR water typing program. The water typing system of the State are defined and codified in Title 222-16-030 WAC, the forest practices rules and regulations. The WADNR in cooperation with the departments of fish and wildlife, and ecology, and in consultation with affected Indian tribes have classified stream, lakes, and ponds. The types are based on a multi-parameter, field- verified geographic information system logistic regression model. The model identified fish habitat by using geomorphic parameters such as basin size, gradient, elevation, and other indicators. The WADNR is in the process of changing its western Washington water typing system from the traditional Types 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 streams to Types S, F, Np, and Ns. On March 1, 2005 the Washington WADNR put into operation improved Internet available maps with S-F-N water types for Western Washington streams. Water type maps (Forest Practice Activity Map) were obtained from the WADNR Water Type Mapping program. Although the maps are relatively new, the same Forest Practice Rule (WAC 222-16-031) is used to define water types (Types 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) at this time. A WADNR stream type conversion table is listed below. 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 36 I Current WADNR System Proposed WADNR System Type 1 Type S Type 2 Type F Type 3 Type F Type 4 Type N p Type 5 Type Ns The Ordinary High-Water Mark as defined by the Washington Forest Practices Manual (WAC 222, December 2002) and the local shoreline authority means the mark on the shores of all waters such as lakes, streams, and tidal waters, which will be found by examining the beds and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the department. Provided that in any area where the ordinary high- water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high-water mark adjoining saltwater shall be the line of mean high tide and the ordinary high-water mark adjoining freshwater shall be the line of mean high-water. City of Bremerton Stream Types— Ordinance 4476 - 7.13.94 Type I streams are those streams inventoried as shorelines of the state and regulated by the Shoreline Master Program of the City of Bremerton and the state Shoreline Management Act. Type II streams are those streams which are smaller than Type I streams and flow year round during periods of normal rainfall. Streams used by salmonids and/or have significant salmonid habitat whether flowing year-round or intermittent. Streams which ' flow directly into streams that are used by salmonids or have significant salmonid habitat whether flowing year-round or flowing intermittent, are Type II streams. Type III streams are those streams that are intermittent or ephemeral during years of normal rainfall and are not used by salmonids and do not have significant salmonid habitat or flow directly into streams used by salmonids or which have significant salmonid habitat. Subject Property Stream Types Streams are depicted on the subject property on the WADNR State Water Type map (FIGURE 10) and on the Local Fish and Wildlife Habitat map (FIGURE 12). The on-site channels for streams varied from one to six feet wide during our field investigations. The channels of streams are relatively well defined with a bank of at EnCo Environmental Corporation 111 Page 37 I least 6 inches in height. The substrates for streams range from small-diameter rocks, small cobbles, medium gravels, and fine to medium sand. In several areas on the property, fine silts have collected in the backwaters of small pools. These backwater areas were found to contain many of the trough wetlands that were identified on the drainage courses. The gradient of the stream is fairly moderate and consists of a series of short (less than two feet) cascades flowing over imbedded woody debris and roots. Mapped streams (if any) are discussed below and are listed in a clockwise direction starting from a northern compass orientation. 1. A WADNR Type II (Type F) stream is depicted near the north boundary and near the northeast corner of the site. The stream originates north of the north property boundary. The stream meanders in a southeasterly direction and enters into the northern boundary of the abandoned water reservoir. The on-site segment of the stream is un-named. ■ 2. A WADNR Type II (Type F) stream is depicted near the east-central part of the site. The stream originates at the southern boundary of the abandoned water reservoir located contiguous to the east of the site. The stream meanders in a southeasterly direction and exits the site at the southeast corner. The stream flows into the Sinclair Inlet of Puget Sound. The on-site segment of the stream is un-named; however, this water body has been identified as Wright Creek. 3. A series of three WADNR Type III (Type N) steams are depicted near the southern boundary and near the southwest section of the site. Two of the streams originate on-site from a northern segment and a western segment. The third stream originates south of the south-central property boundary. The i streams meander in southerly and easterly directions. The on-site segments of �1 the streams are un-named. Off-Site Property Streams and tributaries not directly connected to the those streams already identified on the subject property were not depicted on the WADNR State Water Type map (FIGURE 10) within approximately 200 feet from the subject property boundary. Mapped off-site WADNR streams (if any) are discussed below and are listed in a clockwise direction starting from a northern compass orientation. 1. A WADNR stream was not identified within approximately 200 feet from the property boundary. 15.2 OTHER IDENTIFIED ON-SITE STREAMS In combination with and in addition to the WADNR identified streams a total of sixteen (16) streams were identified on the subject property (Stream "1" — Stream "16" — FIGURE 9). EnCo Environmental Corporation iPage 38 I I1. Based on interpretation, all of the identified on-site streams including those depicted on the WADNR map are Type III (Type N) streams with an exception to the main perennial stream associated with the lower portion of Wetland F as listed below. These streams are located contiguous to Wetlands A, B, C, E, part of F, H, I, J, K, N, P, & Q. These streams are un-named. The Type III stream designation was based upon observed flow patterns and as reported by individuals with knowledge about the site. In addition, the streams do not appear to be suitable for use by salmonids because of constrictions and impedances and do not have significant salmonid habitat. 2. The lower 250 feet section of Wetland F that is associated with the perennial main stream could be Type II stream (not confirmed). This part of the stream has 1 significantly less slope than its upper reaches and the stream bed in this area is filled with silty sediment deposits and contains about 6 inches to 9 inches of water depth in the stream bed. The stream bed in this area also is not severely impeded with rocks, roots, and fallen woody debris. 15.3 WADNR AND OTHER STREAM TYPE BUFFERS ' The standard buffer width (City of Bremerton) determined for the identified streams are based on size, flow rate, elevation, gradient, and special characteristics of the streams, in addition to the proposed land use as specified in the jurisdictional governmental agency Critical Area Ordinance. Stream buffers are measured from the ordinary high water mark of the waterway. rBuffer widths for streams may be modified by averaging, reducing, reducing with mitigation, reducing with enhancement, increasing, or modifying based on regulatory approved variances, sliding scales, and/or open space credits. Jurisdictional steam standard buffer widths based on stream type are presented below. Stream Type - City Standard Buffer Width-City Type I 100' to 200' Type II 50' to 100' ' Type III 25' Buffer Width Modifications The applicant may modify stream standard buffer widths according to thresholds allowed by regulation. If the applicant wishes to modify stream buffer standard widths beyond the thresholds allowed by regulation then the applicant can apply for a Reasonable or Conditional Use Permit. Modifying stream buffer widths beyond the allowed thresholds will more than likely require additional studies, enhancements, mitigation, special passage structures, and/or long term monitoring. Specific buffer EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 39 I requirement criteria depend on the current or proposed future land use activity and/or intensity for any proposed development. Activities allowed in stream buffers are rspecified in the jurisdictional governmental agency wetland regulations. I Streams can be modified by averaging, decreasing, or increasing no more than 50% of the standard buffer width nor be less than 10 feet from the stream. IOn-Site Stream Buffers According to the referenced City of Bremerton Critical Area Ordinance, the determined 1 standard buffer widths for the identified streams on the site are presented in TABLE 1. Where wetland and stream buffers differ and overlap, the more restrictive buffer would likely apply. It is important to note that the City has the final authority to determine Istream categories and required buffers based on the criteria of the ordinance. 16.0 BUILDING SETBACKS IThe capital structure (building) setback width (TABLE 1) for the identified wetlands was determined according to information obtained from the applicable municipal or county Icode. Setbacks range from 0 feet to 15 feet. Setback refers to the minimum required distance between any capital structure and a I specified line such as a lot, public or private right-of-way, utility easement, conservation easement, future street right-of-way as identified through an official control or buffer line that is required to remain free of structures unless otherwise provided in the regulations. 111 If the property is to be developed a site plan shall depict the proper setbacks. 17.0 REGULATORY EXEMPTIONS IWetland Exemptions I Jurisdictional wetland exemptions are primarily based on wetland category and size. A summary of the allowed exemptions are presented below. On-site wetlands which may qualify for a wetland exemption are presented in TABLE 1. ICity of Bremerton 1 Wetland Category Size of Wetland Wetland Criteria Type III & IV 1,000 square feet Must be hydrologically isolated 111 I Type III 2,500 square feet Director shall allow this allowance Wetland has no exceptional value Applicant to provide monetary Icompensation, or EnCo Environmental Corporation 111 Page 40 I Applicant may dedicate land with conditions in lieu of monetary compensation, or Applicant may prepare a wetland mitigation plan to compensate for loss Type IV 10,000 square feet Director shall allow this allowance Wetland has no exceptional value Applicant to provide monetary compensation, or Applicant may dedicate land with conditions in lieu of monetary compensation, or Applicant may prepare a wetland mitigation plan to compensate for loss Type III One acre Director may allow this allowance Applicant to provide monetary compensation, or Applicant may dedicate land with conditions in lieu of monetary compensation, or Applicant may prepare a wetland mitigation plan to compensate for loss Type IV One acre Director may allow this allowance Applicant to provide monetary compensation, or Applicant may dedicate land with conditions in lieu of monetary compensation, or Applicant may prepare a wetland mitigation plan to compensate for loss In most cases the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers makes the final determination as to whether an area meets the definition of a wetland (including "small-sized", "isolated", "hydrologically isolated", and/or"adjacent" wetlands) or a waterway and whether or not any permits are required for any proposed alterations. In some cases isolated wetlands smaller than 1/3 acre can be dredged or filled in with agency authorization and/or 1 permits. Other Listed Exemptions jAgricultural, utility easements, roadways, access ways, educational research, small pathways, recreation, grass-lined swales, and other non-intrusive land uses may be iexempt from certain critical area regulations. In most cases land use activities that EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 41 I encroach within regulated wetland buffers are grandfathered and can continue as long as the land use activity does not change. 18.0 OFF-SITE WETLANDS A cursory inspection and limited assessment for indications of off-site wetlands was performed within approximately 200 feet of the property boundary. The assessment was based upon reviewing reasonably ascertainable information and upon performing a cursory inspection as viewed from the subject site in order to prevent trespassing onto other properties. Four off-site wetlands were observed within about 200 feet of the site. These are depicted on FIGURE 9 as Off-Site Wetland #1 — Off-Site Wetland #4. The potential reaches of wetland buffers from these four identified off-site wetlands do not encroach onto the proposed development footprint at this time. t 19.0 CONCLUSIONS Based upon field work, submitted data, research, and information acquired, seventeen (17) wetlands (Wetland A— Wetland Q) are located on the subject property that was studied. The entire footprints of eleven (11) of the 17 identified wetlands are located entirely on the subject property. The remaining six (6) wetlands (Wetlands B, E, F, N, 0, & Q) are located both on and off of the subject property. The observed and evaluated characteristics, category, and determined standard buffer widths for each of the wetlands are summarized in TABLES 1A— 1Q (APPENDIX B). 20.0 RECOMMENDATIONS I . Submit the appropriate number of copies of this wetland report, an "as-built" development construction plan, a buffer width modification plan (if needed), a wetland and master plan application, and the required permit application, filing, and/or review fees to the jurisdictional government agency (City of Bremerton) prior to any site development. • The final determination of all wetlands, wetland edges, streams, critical areas, and buffers should be made by the jurisdictional governmental agency prior to any construction activities that may affect or modify any wetland. • Appropriately mark the outer extent of the stream and wetland buffer(with any approved buffer width modifications) with permanent signs affixed to wood or metal posts at a distance from each other as determined in the jurisdictional governmental agency regulations. The signs shall be maintained throughout the duration of the permit. EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 Page 42 I lin n • Remove the stream markers and wetland delineation flags and test plot markers after the jurisdictional governmental agency has approved the category and the outer boundary of the identified wetlands. • The permit holder may be required by the jurisdictional government agency to create a separate sensitive area tract or tracts containing the areas determined to be wetlands, streams, and/or buffers. Sensitive area tracts are legally created tracts containing wetlands, streams, and their contiguous buffers that shall remain undeveloped in perpetuity. ♦ Submit proper notice in the public record of the presence of wetlands, streams, or buffers on the subject property. The notice must be submitted to the appropriate Property Records Division in the County. ♦ If any wetland, including "small-sized", "isolated", "hydraulically isolated" or "adjacent" wetlands, are to be dredged, filled, or negatively impacted by future land use activities the applicant will more than likely need to obtain authorization and a permit from the jurisdictional government agency, WADOE, and/or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Placement of fill material into or dredging material out of any wetland is not advised unless authorized by the proper governmental agency. 21.0 REFERENCES Reference Books Cooke, Sarah Spear, A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington & Northwestern Oregon, Seattle Audubon Society, Copyright May 1997, pages 417. Farrar, Laird, John, Trees of the Northern United States and Canada, Iowa State Press — Blackwell Publishing Company, 1995. Guard, Jennifer B., Wetland Plants of Oregon & Washington, Lone Pine Publishing Company, Redmond WA, 238 pages, 1995. Hafenrichter, A.L., Grasses and Legumes for Soil Conservation in the Pacific Northwest and Great Basin States, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation jService, Publication Number 1491, January 1979. Hitchcock & Cronquist, Flora of the Pacific Northwest, University of Washington Press, 730 pages, Twelfth Printing, 2001. Lyons, C. P. & Bill Merilees, Trees, Shrubs & Flowers to Know in Washington & British Columbia, Lone Pine Publishing, Redmond WA, 375 pages, 1995. Mitsch, William and Gossalink, James, Wetlands, Van Nostrand Reinhold NY, 1986, ' 539 pages. EnCo Environmental Corporation 111 Page 43 I I 1 Munsell Soil Color Charts, Macbeth Division of Kollmorgen Instruments Corporation, Baltimore MD, 1990 Edition, Revised in 2000. Pennsylvania State University, Information and Communication Technologies in the College of Agricultural Sciences, Diagnosing Soil Compaction Using a Penetrometer, Agronomy Facts #63, 2002. Peterson Field Guide Series, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Theodore F. Niehaus, A Field Guide to Pacific States Wildflowers, 1976. Pojar & Mackinnon, Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast, Lone Pine Publishing Company, Redmond WA, 527 pages, 1994. ' Porter B. Reed. Jr., U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9), 1988, 89pp., Supplement dated 1993. Tiner, Ralph W., Wetland Indicators: A Guide to Wetland Identification, Delineation, Classification, and Mapping, Lewis Publishers, Washington D.C., 392 pages, 1999. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Taxonomy, Agricultural Handbook #436, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., Second Edition, 1999. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Keys to Soil Taxonomy, Pocahontas Press, Inc., Blacksburg VA, 8th Edition, 1999. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Hydric Soils of the United States, Revised June ' 1991. University of Alberta Press. Edmonton, Alberta Canada, France Royer & Richard 1 Dickinson, Weeds of the Northern U.S. and Canada, Lone Pine Publishing, Renton WA, 1999. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Sponsored by the California Weed Science Society, Joseph M. DiTomaso, Aquatic and Riparian Weeds of the West, Publication 3421, 2003. Western Society of Weed Science, Western United States Land Grant Universities, University of Wyoming, Tom D. Whitson, Editor, Weeds of the West, 9th Edition, 2002. Wetland Training Institute, Inc., Field Guide for Wetland Delineation for 1987 Corps of Engineers Manual, reprinted 1999. EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 Page 44 I I Whitney, Stephen, Rob Sandelin, Field Guide to the Cascades & Olympics, The Mountaineers Books, Second Edition, 2003. Maps, Diagrams, Surveys, and/or Photographs Hatton Godat Pantier, Engineers and Surveyors, Tumwater, WA, Professional Surveyed Wetland Delineation Map, West Hills Residential Development, Bremerton, Kitsap County, WA, March, 2006. DeLorme, Yarmouth ME, Street Atlas USA, Vicinity Map of the Subject Property, Version 2005. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Bremerton WA, Community Panel 530093-0001-0015, Effective Date: August 15, 1979 and Kitsap County, Community Panel 5300920315B, Panel 315 of 400, Effective Date: May 15, 1980. Kitsap County Assessor and GeoData Map Center, Permitting, and Planning, Port Orchard WA, aerial photographs, wetland inventory maps, critical area maps, high groundwater maps, parcel summaries, and parcel plot maps downloaded from the Internet in March 2006. iKitsap County Department of Community Development, Port Orchard WA, Fish & Wildlife Habitat Map (January 18, 2005) and Wetlands and Hydric Soils Map (January 2006) as downloaded from the Internet in March 2006. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (Natural Resources Conservation District), Soil Survey of Kitsap County, Aerial photograph with mapped soil associations, descriptions, classifications, and series, September 1980 Edition, Map ID# 21 and/or NRCS ArcIMS Internet available mapping database. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands ' Inventory Map, Bremerton West WA, Scale: 1:24,000, 1987. United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Map, Bremerton West WA Quadrangle, WA, 7.5-Minute Series (Topographic), 1953, revised in 1981. I Washington Department of Natural Resources, Washington Water Typing Program, Forest Practices Application and Review System Mapping Center, Section, Township, Range of the Subject Property, Bremerton, Kitsap County, WA, May 2005 edition, downloaded from the Internet on March 2006. EnCo Environmental Corporation 111 Page 45 I Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington Priority Habitat & Species Program, Habitat and Species Map, Section, Township, Range of the Subject ' Property, Bremerton, Kitsap County, December 6, 2005. Regulations and Regulatory Manuals City of Bremerton, Bremerton Municipal Code, Critical Lands Ordinance No. 4422 as amended by 4476 on July 31, 1994, Chapter V, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas, Chapter VIII, Wetlands and Streams Corridors. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg MS, Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual — Technical Report Y-87-1, Environmental Laboratory, Department of the Army, January 1987. United States Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C., Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, January 10, 1989. Washington Department of Ecology, Lacey WA, Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, Publication #96-94, 143 pages, March 1997. Washington Department of Ecology, Lacey WA, Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington, Publication #91-57, October 1991. iWashington Forest Practices Manual, Washington Forest Practices Board, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia WA, WAC 222-16-030 & WAC 222- '1 16-031, Water Typing System, December 2002. Correspondence and Other Documents Washington Department of Natural Resources, Washington Natural Heritage Program, Natural Heritage Information System, Letter Report on the Subject Property, Bremerton, Kitsap County, December 27, 2005. Raedeke Associates, Inc., Wetland Inventory, West Hills Property, Bremerton WA, December 23, 1997. Raedeke Associates, Inc., Addendum Report, West Hills Property, Bremerton WA, March 3, 1997. Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife, Washington Priority Habitat & Species Program, Habitat and Species Report, Letter Report on the Subject Property, Bremerton, Kitsap County, December 7, 2005. EnCo Environmental Corporation Page 46 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 i t . EnCo Environmental Corporation I APPENDIX A FIGURES, DIAGRAMS, MAPS, AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH I I r I 1 I I I I I 1 Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation,Mitigation&Restoration I II I TERMS AND CONDITIONS -WETLANDS I The EnCo report is for the exclusive use of our client and their assigns. Any other parties that wish to use the report shall notify EnCo in writing and shall obtain a Reliance ILetter. A separate fee will be charged for this service. The intent of the report was to identify and delineate portions of the subject property that I could be classified as wetland according to the wetland delineation methods described in the report text. The information presented in the attached report reflects the best professional opinion regarding the conditions observed on the subject property at the time the work was performed. The scope of work did not include determining wetland function and values, completing permit applications, attending meetings with the client or regulatory officials, preparing mitigation plans, habitat or biological analysis, endangered I species studies, erosion and sedimentation issues, pollutant impacts, stormwater drainage, and/or geotechnical impacts. I In delineating wetlands EnCo employed professional and technical judgment in accordance with the degree of care and skill generally accepted in the nature of the work accomplished within the constraints of time, budget, and defined scope of work. Our services were executed in accordance with professional standards acceptable in this profession in accordance with then-current technical guidelines and criteria. The determination of ecological system classifications, functions, values, and boundaries is an inexact science and different individuals and agencies may reach different Iconclusions. Wetlands are dynamic communities and may change over time. We cannot guarantee the outcome of such agency determinations. The information and I conclusions presented in the attached report may need to be revised based on comments from agency determinations. I The work was performed based on my understanding of the local, state, and federal regulations and site conditions at the time of the field work. The final wetland and buffer boundary determinations and wetland classifications and/or categories should be verified Iand approved by the local jurisdiction prior to any land use modification. Past and present conditions, which cannot or could not be observed, were established I on the basis of reasonably ascertainable records, maps, photographs, documents, and/or information provided by federal, state, and/or local agencies and contacted individuals. EnCo cannot attest to the validity, completeness, or accuracy of these documents or personal accounts. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. IItems provided by the client included the right of entry (verbally or by a contract) onto the subject property for conducting the work. The property boundaries were clearly marked I or determined by the client prior the fieldwork. A professional survey was or will be performed by others. I I I I DELORME Street Atlas USA®2005 I yo �� CEDARWOOD DR ' ,CH DR QST g W. w m a ., %ukc' LAKEMONT LN O o m0 . HD ,., FITZWATER LN e •" 5�v AOR -53 rn ��C$ 6 9I • 1313 Z F > > ¢ Q��SqQ� 1 PL oo = m 9TH ST z Z r w — co ° ® o o z o m KITS^?WAY T 0 rcn pO�i 0 '< ¢rn Q roe�•.L • 4� z A y > Z Y Gi <w Q O O nQo�<y o C �9yCl m J v $Nf WpV " ¢ 1 z Z n C>. v r�+ 9 r'. 'C w ¢ cP m =a• S �� �y N O m O �p.Fy z w 0c6p 1ST ST ea W �'!F z 'Nast Park N Op o z m © COw� Ill o KITSAP LAKE RD NW0 ST coDF = o w ¢ > � z Ci arleston ¢ �O 0 a m CO / m • A z z RNERRD73 m m CO • ¢ o f m Qz O , Z z N WJST a z o O < w < > m > r = m < > m m 0 o ¢ • CO WGST GST CO WFST FST ST FST r LINDEN ST �1S�oo ENavy Yard City // y a 2. ' w • I `Ir ©a CST West Hills Development a O Q o Bremerton WA BST 7J s` > 1 I Q CCm 0 CC 304 0 � ¢ 0 I ¢ a5 o0 W ?t Q_, O > 03 Nr- z i < co 0 -a $ N En —I > o . EVANS ST �p o 0 o n x 4- * SAND DOLLAR RD WZ'• h 3 C. Q 13 L „ 1 Parcel#s: 21240130072009&29240110182002 Vicinity Map Figure 1 Legal: Part of Sections 21,28&29 T24N, R 01 E Triway Enterprises—West Hills Development Jurisdiction: City of Bremerton Bremerton WA I ,r En Co P.O.Box 731747 0 1" Environmental Puyallup WA 98373 I Approximate Scale: 1"= 1,866.7' � N Corporation 253.841.9710. 253.841.0264 fax Map Source: DeLorme Street Atlas 2005 Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments • Remediation Services •Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration • Environmental Permitting �� I 1 I I I s„ �t'�t �<P HARLOW DR NW ii, I 1ST ST '5Lz j. u'ti � 11.- a KEAN BLVD I /dE'RNER i0 LV WERNER RD WERNER RD I A •� � EST y D5T z 0 IZa Lo J W < 5 a I +"i u m > Q I- W O Q u_ I I... SANDt:.au Rn w Y N ,v a I 12401-3-007-2009 5tt" ;o• r'!ht Kusa• Coun 2004 I I I IParcel #s: 21240130072009 & 29240110182002 Plot Map Figure 2 Triway Enterprises—West Hills Development IBremerton WA V 1 T E n C 0 P.O.Box 731747 0 Environmental Puyallup WA 98373 -� Corporation 253.841.9710• 253.841.0264 fax Map Source: County GeoData Center IPhase I&II Environmental Site Assessments • Remediation Services• Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration • Environmental Permitting I I iA`R '4eit,, :', "' -- a'kP x;^uriw, R e75 w i�.. C yf `�'r �., .4;0.-..",.,',.., .. ..-7::-:,....;;.:',%.,:-,...:.-.!,:. z.• 'yt� Y ;•;:i;:2';':-:::i.:.7w,{�.,, f � SII I I I 111 I I I Subject Property I 1 ,e4020 1 51��: ",coun 2004 I.I�I _JI I I I 1004. I 1-11 I �i ti I Ga.. flht Kitsa. Co u n 2004 .. Irrcel #s: 21240130072009 & 29240110182002 Aerial Map - 2003 Figure 3 Triway Enterprises—West Hills Development Bremerton WA I VV�V1 �f` O P.0.Box 731747 I 0 "l" 41 Environmental Puyallup WA 98373 Corporation 253.841.9710• 253.841.0264 fax , 1111111111•111 •I Aerial Photograph Source: County GeoData Center Phase I &II Environmental Site Assessments ° Remediation Services °Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration 0 Environmental Permitting I 11 _ - (r it. I I IA�i "meg I/7:-,,,„; . ��! II n i� � ,4,-� ���� ( {�,1 ,,\-63,1'' aterT��-�� eat '1 (---/ ' '' i c r .. . � - (, �, 'fit ;' . 'LI 1 ,�,I'-'N../ ' /,/. . it • •I 7 l ��: tp`. JI T IP®.✓oma _,1 . ... 1 i Ill t _ if ' IIS II I// i • • r 'i %' a -., r; 11 i i' t WaterTank 4', _ ! IIr i -'it ; t' n t ( w re II Iit 1� '' 'j (11- ---.- ,'Heins Lake' °o • I ' it,— 'r i :1s I I.,, ic _I y sl Subject Property-► 1 ry ! .,r,' 3 1 I xancler ,, / l �• Ir., Lake °I ' �'1 C -� ��` h, % .11238 ,� _ ��G � i '�T' i _ . • . 7 /r _ 1x262 I i l / r 11, J f — — " l w 1 i • r i i1 1 :I, I Jarstad- J ii • l • ' ° Lake' i II 1.,l): , . •• ''' , .. . _ /// Ili !r I 11:$u)5(atIOR / 'I`X 1 ./ I . / /29 i IIr `. �" 19 ir ii '-';9)2"--',....----;-----A :I i / 'r .:tt i tI "_ �i — .1i '- 4 nVA� O.1 _ — r / F / li % a I` l � 000° o / °o JS — 0oo 0 � .. 4.°',. • �1 / /OB\ Gort Cck 1 gi \ .. ✓~ /i00°° 0000 ,6% ',0 6 1� t • mp-Plant ' �1bs'tabone `l °00 0°000 / U 100 / ." _a ., • 1 • . !�ar 00°V` 11 ^ _ 0 o0 i V. ••••1' ° � o0 oeki p 0 I, i Mud °° o f fir 1 �_-� • ) 000000 ° y{ "•�•-G i �I t •• ' •0-1 7 ••p II°'— O/ �• 0 00 .Piles 080.00•$0 e81r1_§_-- i 174...."...,;;,s. 1 ,:• •Gorst .,s• sti 1 �. 1 .t, • 11 i • 14 L ' ;1_I •Irr Ander11son tit✓ t ,i •Plea ant• Suo Cr T u Parcel#s: 21240130072009 & 29240110182002 Topographic Map Figure 4 1 Triway Enterprises—West Hills Development Contour Interval:20'Bremerton West Map Bremerton WA I Y" Y En(.o P.O.Box 731747 0 1" Environmental Puyallup WA 98373 1 Approximate Scale: 1"=2,000' -- N Corporation 253.841.9710. 253.841.0264 fax Map Source:U. S. Geological Survey IPhase I&II Environmental Site Assessments• Remediation Services • Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration • Environmental Permitting I 1 . El. t., •. 1. \----:'1 , :' -...„ sl, \ \ —1-, , - .,, . 4i4-0 4-••, i• ,,. 5,,,, , -• rvi,; , - vtli '. , .,,_ ),,Liw ',, \ \' ... N• 0 it- I 1 L2 Ae.k ,.' ,,,,- (. \) '\\\ '1 II( ';.-; OPPoPuldlilliiiti',4 .:'''' i i‘(.1;;.',7:";36 ' '''''' '' ' - ‘• --''' . '1 ,°tl' it 1(,\_ .6,,,,J; 7)- N:`; 4.,,,,.1 I i ••, % \\ I 1 ./ /:::...S1,,, /1/44.1,1 1,, ,,,,,,,, ....‘ i • it 1 i 1 ii,10yr;:.,,P, h 7, '' •''',:--: / ;,.. , -)o;1 VV at,,N11'4. .)''):-.A%,'' ' • .?il 1:""*I• °Ini:'' II Irr , . . `,....,' 1 i. .. ''C. 'T :Pwq ''' ' '7.' 11'4 , ' •.,...:,-_,,,,'\ :•_•,;-; -;,. . - — - - , ,••,:, '''..),,_it ___;_- '44- • -;fi f ,'., ,.... j;I/ ' e;', .) , 1 ,(V ---- 1 111 ---°-'4. 4 4/'' 17F%-e '''i'., • ---- -e? It- ,10F:iy--' I r\\ ,- ',;,.1-- .12 ' ''.:',-,• '''-' • -: , r/T EM ./r1--' ) ?., % / 1% ; ),.1* 0 1 , ? --:',.•7';i''?" 17'''', ' F, -.;,--...,:H17',:71 r3.1k bk.....,;:v ':-/ .,',14," ,.,--,',,-'''' -,.. ' •-, V "- ,e;f' \ f`ii-'A", " : — .,,vgFp/C ;-,' ,..1,) •..\ '• -,:'',0- -.:.',-,. )? ,,••••,,,) ‘).-- , j ) ,IP/F• '")' ? - /'1 ' '.. ',1 .:11. i? ',\sj,,.:,.k.-. . , ''1,--•••=.,-..-))•• . , : . .,1 pi(.( (r ,,-- ) 4,,,,‘ ir —) fflt ,iit:ii4..-..-h, --...•,*.s...,,.'':,•, 'kif , , ,.,\'',\''- :., ' '. . ,,,:fr,---) 1 . /i ‘r, 1 21.41;r/:/41:A/PEMC : ,:' ,t1‘,(^,,2 •7„./. 7:1' ;''''' l'4111;114C ' ili 14-"! ' 4:`\':,\::11'\:?-4'-' ..:1 7.- ') ,I 4,4,°?,,,',',.e .,,„fai.-:r-v, ',k' ,,,,/$ '• E* .n'i„.7,,,..''1. 0.1,..--, ,:siU...,'.-L:PC-. ,-,,.-.''.-;..*:"7,,,,,i.'4.\ '''''-. --i ' " / p 0,c/;,./77/,*--- , ,•',), , ---- : . ./ . ( .4.-,'.:- ',..:. ,,,_ v .\: i ,,p,'_,1!;:t., z '\\ 9 '',///1..,,/ .7.°°/-1 ''''' ' 1'"2/1// /4" - '''''-'"D) )' \ ( fi ---- ---... ..,,,. .. .,r-4,-7.,,,o,,, .. A j , , - . •.:: „ „,,e,' - qt„,,,----)u,..„-. ----: \:, -/ .t'''t.: f-jr-k,•:‘..:T' 1„:::::;,,7.,,,,\,“ l'‘‘,11-'-‘, \,,,,,,'''*i.,\,,',. ' 1,11'a-1: ',--.-::::;4:,-, \ ,/, Kiej,44/,`,1,Foc i /,y,/,„• ,,,t‘,.1 v ,.,,.._— _,- I k.---„<4:4 -, t ,,i x-- \,, -,,,,:',;,, ,,„,,,,,,,:-\ 1 ,,..,\.:-,, ,,-7,-----7--; „._:,:a„..,:y 4,, 1':');.//.•11) i/pri'v' Y t ---- I • ,,, , , ;,_ / ' .;''''-?-iii //// C /;" -'\ \•Il n' \ , ' ; T : ,, ,,, '",'.k,-;i•-lel A \ '-i.i.'.. 'ff't -' ' 1 N' „.„---f..,,? 4/' 1' ' 11114 ''':' --IPSS'YVI!f'''4---1-1-1 " " I,P- .,'" .t.-• 4:4t. ,,,. I. :://r\, ,,,1', /, I ‘.- ,/,---`,-.2.1.f(t-',.)F;O,W1•14_,;77',. , /.,)(1, 11 I/• if bil•, .. i '. 41.-i4,,, f\ror,? ,,Nte•N, ,p,tI, 4: !,, //`.-Cf -:-Y/717.al/ I I,• A(7:1/7i7e;2/,,-,--4 ,V(...' 17‘.;", i ‘ti 1 ir•Ai :: '\\ 1:\\-,37 i'fi7,' 7S-- ri'`[: •;'' 'IPT4'''',1/-11 c-1-: i.'; 'II'' ' '':. '''2•--,,, ,/,, Heim illa„e,. ,,,,,37;2),,,,,,,,,;:,, _ ,„„;___ ,, 1 If; ,_ .,. --. , ,..,,*.-{,--- ,,,,,,.42•,...- •44 , , k :::-..' i''':'. .!k:. /-:,. •`./55-/_/' Subject Property c i / \\\--\\'.; ' 4:' . : ::1' ,,,Ii)(11, i. , ,TLIi - )(J.;J-",----90 ) N1,....v 1 • •;,'. — it-JUN.1144,r,,i, ,- k---(---• -'7"- 4 ''' ,:,'-'----•:C •\. 1 a, '...t7.'Cf:' --7 , \IW.404:-'' ''''"'< C/1‘'' j4.0w1.411,, •,--, , „.., N \ ---,, ,,,- w, i. 24 u („,joift ,. , , .;, __, ,,, ,,,,_.. ,,, ,, ,,i u 4. ;, 1/L1 o /e'an (" ';'-7r---- '. r -- ', ,, , vic --, :i 1/i'jr/') j' 0---Pf5 C' '' 'c'Yz%, ::Rf'311:ftAik -r r:i(j1/4/ f 40wHh (1 f,,...di , :1• ;,. i „ / 'Y' c--.{ , „,,,V. ,:,,T• ,•;ve,' . :: :;. ',/irti' •,i Txtice 2,P4,1 _friv ,, --1•,;•1' . '' I V. , _„.,),,ft,))(.;._ ---E E w'N', '4'1.17',' .. .,:; '0`,•• ''''1 ' . Sii Iv P-,6...,--- : h I , D ) v....._,, ) .c ,1.-„, ' ' '' '_.`7' (•- .\`•-„\--.- „.."1.,Al i (-Art4;0--) 49/=,°-\r--) \',:-' '' ,. ,. r'. I / :(‘ ').;\ ) r L; ' , '`k_iy--\‘---valWi / • - 2 cl - . .. ,..' .; :- ili) ,?`• 1 ) (t V/ „ ---;.--1 2, ''=-:' .-= POWI-46 I )) I •.:;, s , ) r.> -____ ;,..„ ....---\i ••••),,,r)-) \4\ _1 i / le! ''''' ' rf• f..t.: ' , ''' E2USN • „ :)I• „,__' „.• ,,---, -•;5,=-1,,r ..,, , d , ,( , ' ',/ .t--\--•r/ t: 1), • I;\ :'. ',-....4,. ;f4k-Rtf5.(7,,:• ., .'-‘7?.„.- } ' gt441:::- ' I '';:',” -----1 ///11'/ ' ik :).\--11-. 4'.6,7,-;(,, ‘'. ,:3co, ( ," 7, , r• ,-1 1-• - z ,-,10, ,.., j, -,....-%)) ,, ,, %.‘ '(.,,-' ft j --,.. : • _ .,,,,..4,,,,,,- \'\, ,( r- ,6,--;-',1% ,,,,,-,-,- „,...?„;;;.,,-, 34,04.,r' ", ,c„,41:,/rt.' / . .....„_/,f"--' I ''•• , /1( .>,..;.N,. 1`--,•.- ..2., . fi' - k. .I . i --' I( •-• 'I ' 7'',1--x 4' r7'•••-ei•. ' .' ";-:511 ; 'Ig,i ,•?: r="1 ':''.; CV4fi 114 4- ' ' 6'; . ' ' '' ''`'-':,'''''''''4i'''''''.5' '--),,,'l ' ' j 1V4A 11) ,. -. • -; -;;- -•'''' ' , ' ''.•1.1' ';'';'-''';‘,7 •.:,•'442---:'-; - ,' /*,,7 I ' I4, --+ ' ric;'› "`„-,,,,--.-',. ‘‘ '-'--.',-- -.- ,„, I 7! ---- ii,p';, ---,;. ‘ II, :,,,--"- ' ,, \ , 1019 g,,, ,,,71/1( - 1,.,,;• ,,, ,,„..-.-•: ---:-4‘•_,,,,„.. --:- ..-- . I , 7, I • „-----. /-,---, .6!--1, -- • ":-.•-.---,',, -;,-;,,,,- 777:-:-;-.1-•• I I,1 ti,\- ).), ..11,14„.I\T.._ /4''' .00 ,,.,,"%,: 1-, _4/ t ,. _ • . ,„. - ,I. --;-,.,-,--- .:••)--tf '''7,-'' ., • , -.:,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,14,:"..,h,, ,,,„_.,i. „.._._.____,L,,,,_ it,/7.1..k.e.--__v.,- .; -.. '•:•7V-- 4,.'"-F,'4./-:I.----21 .% -\'4--...5.' .4•4',4 ,'''• : ' ./'' I ...i, '',...-1 l'',.-',, , , „.. ',/i\ - ',. -) S'', 14-P- ' ', -'-'\ -- /h'' .., 24A,,---- ,"; ..::, 44-4.'4.• ''X' / E2—ABN '.:'r." ''\: 0, E2EMN \ ‘ ?,.—`—'1C.,1;;F- c_,57'' -, kQrs c' '8/ ''') 4-':,:: 4'4.:4:. taUSM , 'PEt<ile_. \, --h. 7.,_ •'.5.--... " .-,1kly''''r,1 . ;?.. „,.. , '',„. .-4••• •_i.,,,,:f" 1 ( , :., .,, - '.Yff' - 4, ..100" -- ---/ ' '' ' . _ ,... , ' M w P qEmN -- .-• • • , • 4vort•-fi, ' • /,, ..,,,,;,--- ,, Ploc ..... ' .,:,,, ' . 447 " .' :., I „4° ,y144:\'_J,'..,,, . n,' _44,4-;:,7,, (j.r-t.,,- _ .) ,. ,' / , •7 "tICY‘o" ,t " °CI I EAMN elle" ?:';,.;:" '''' '7H-- - )11' \'Ii--'' Parcel#s: 21240130072009 &29240110182002 National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 5 On-Site NWI Identified Wetland(s): Triway Enterprises—West Hills Development 1 POWHh, 1 PFOC, 2 R30WH,and 1 PSSC Bremerton WA I lit E,nU•?f,-Ni o IP.O.Box 731747 Puyallup WA 98373 i Approximate Source:roximateScale.usDe 1"p N Corporation 253.841.9710• 253.841.0264 fax Map Dept-. 2of0the Interior: Environmental Interior: Fish&Wildlife Service Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments • Remediation Services • Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration • Environmental Permitting 3 44 i 3 /s3p,+ r. 49 Y { + 26 +i. 2 1 2 3 26 y ( 37/ 5 Pi 38 M °ej 32 1 25 i 2 / d.• � 3 .� • 38 !* :-2 �� 26 y 3� 10 �xj Ni- ''\ �/ - f�� c • n 2. 3 2 d- / �� 36/..„„,„7„,„//--( 1 y $ i 3 45 . 21 �r� 46 / S i cm.' Na f c�' 1 - i 1 Yai l� ,�s' a � Lake 2,/�3a �� ��'!..t � z6 � �-,,� tI 2 / eh ___,--/--- Subject Property---♦ 25 ( 7—� / w 3 0 _J l 27 u /,0 / 26 25 �� 1 63 \ 4lesander % 2fi . 27 ��` ( 1 Lunea..eitoom -? \ I ( 44 / 25 5 26 ,"\ �'•,... \ 2 2 ` / 1 3 s l---\ 25 � /�� V / 25 V 36 3 " - ✓� 38 26 `_ 27 30 4 1 23 25 y /25 ''---/\-- 3 2$ -4 s. • g / 46 26/23 / 26 26(w 231 �- ,43\ 2 _ , --�;�� P `y -- Jar.;tad 4, �j 25 ,. 5 K ? N Lake /36 / /// >� 16'�• m \ 27 - � •.) `7)\J ro L: 38 45 3 28 , 2.6 37 45 30 )"- 44 .,_7211:1-\.: le 18 J--� lES 30 6 63 Ir1411 Gory 18 37 `-',,--371. ) 37 63 �`� 3 ,_ 21 � L 44 4-57._` , / 44 i \�'.'-'•------7--,-/--• �`---.1 Gtss - 33 37 29 o 411 63 --• • , ');111.,„ 29, tib` 18//, nrs1: • 3 38 :`t ".fl \� 18 18 ie 63 �. �`u:::�.. 1. , . . r i_C Parcel #s: 21240130072009 & 29240110182002 Soil Survey Map Figure 6 1 On-Site Soil Types: Triway Enterprises— West Hills Development 2,3= Alderwood Very Gravelly Sandy Loam(6%-30%) Bremerton WA 10= Dystric Xerorthents(45%-70%) 1 25,26= Kilchis Very Gravelly Sandy Loam(15%-70%) Y 27= Kilchis-Shelton Complex(30%-50%) 37= Norma Fine Sandy4 ri O P.O.Box 731747 Loam(0%-3%) Puyallup WA 98373 I Approximate Scale: 1"=2,000' N Environmental Corporation 253.841.9710. 253.841.0264 fax Map Source: County Soil Survey/Natural Resources District Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments • Remediation Services • Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration • Environmental Permitting I I '"] I REFERENCE ELEVATION `t4 I MARK (FT.MGM' OP I RM69 146.67 Set I J - T2. lc 61459 147.40 Set of 0.1 1 Y 0.1 T2 Doi F- I RM80 29.82 Se, I 2 _ _ . list Q \ I IIY 0 ( �� ��� W31'I 2 2 o I \`,/ II JH sr!OrsrU _/ ir Zl \\✓ 123 0 I sr 1 I 0© 1. Q , Subject Property—► • 0 �� W U_ I ___c_______ ____ __F ZONE C I D ��' iI aIIv \ i �a``, I oQ ' = Na Il r ^i► Q u~i (L 1 ZONEC 28 ii ;l I 29 SO11 1 N... �� Jarttad Lake i t ' , I ,_.. -- (iii: , I,__I , ,, JJ N _. ., , , 14 27 I I 1 Parcel#s: 21240130072009 & 29240110182002 Flood Survey Map Figure 7 On-Site Flood Zone Designation: Triway Enterprises—West Hills Development Zone C: Areas of minimal flooding(no shading) Bremerton WA -Y En C o P.O.Box 731747 0 1" Environmental Puyallup WA 98373 I -- N Corporation 253.841.9710• 253.841.0264 fax Map Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency IPhase I& II Environmental Site Assessments • Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration • Environmental Permitting I I I IA 1 1 -tsbi r) 1 L § La 008111616, ' ' ' t Ns air ' h is , I s 0.s ":'1.1 Subject Property--► • f / ,-, IV • I r '- at It� \-,/ -,./ ~ ea L•{ Parcel#s: 21240130072009 &29240110182002 Local Wetland Inventory Map Figure 8 Color Key: Triway Enterprises—West Hills Development Green= Inventoried Hydric Soils and/or Wetlands Bremerton WA Blue= Inventoried Water Bodies Note: Depicted wetlands may or may not be confirmed o 1" �'+-,n(�0 P.O.Box 731747 MINIMEnvironmental Puyallup WA 98373 ' N Corporation 253.841.9710• 253.841.0264 fax Source: Kitsap County GeoData Map Map IPhase I&II Environmental Site Assessments • Remediation Services • Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration • Environmental Permitting 1 I I Parcel #s: 21240130072009 & 2 401101$20 �h Wetland Delineation Map Figure 9 Wetland Biologist: Date: 3.10.06 Triway Enterprises— West Hills Development Bremerton WA Footprint of Wetlands VYY En Co P.O.Box 731747 Environmental Puyallup WA 98373 Approximate Scale: 1"= Corporation 253.841.9710. 253.841.0264 fax Map Source: Hatton Godat Pantier Engineers and Surveyors / I FIGURE EXISTING CONDITIONS -1111 aM".' WETLAND —.. _. CONTINUES' 010 IRAEDEKE ASSOCIATES, INC. 5711 NORTHEAST 63RD ST. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 68115 L,_� 1206) 526.8122 FAX: (206) 626.2880 -. ..ow.� I nn RA #96018 1/9/97 G.L New Base map, Rev Acs.: Wetlds.1 &, 9 1 96018.02 12/97 GL Add Wetland 8 & buffer; Reservoir dams, overflows ' (from: "West Hills Dam Study" by MacLearnsberry, Inc.12/18/96) 5 W1 FFEJ WETLAND CHART I Wetland _Number 1 Wetland Area Community 2 _(_A_cres) Classification 16.37 PF01 2 0.06 PEM1 3 10.10 PF01 4 0.34 PF01 5 0.04 PF01 6 0.20 PSS1 7 0.28 PF01 8 0.98 PSS1,PFO1 9 0.41 PSS1 10 11 0.04 0.83 PSS1 PSS1 12 0.17 PF01 13 0,03 PSS1 Tn-rA I.P., 29',&S . M I L jkny, 005 1 1 1. Acreages listed are for portions of the wetland i= on the West Hills property only. Wetlands 1 004 and 3 extend off the site. Acreage source: MacLearnsberry, Inc. (10/1996). 2. Wetland classification follows Corvardin et al. I 1 i (1992). See text for detailed descriptions. / ✓ Key to wetland plant community classes: II I I. PEM1. = Palustrine, persistent, emergent ------------ PSS1 = Palustrine, scrub -shrub, broad-leaved I 1 deciduous PF01 = Palustrine, forested, broad-leaved deciduous I "Nate: On this drawing: IlWetland continues" is It ' determined by visual observation only. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: APPROX. 267 ACRES I' I i TOTAL WETLAND ARCA: 29.85 ACRES �," I�1� 11I f I , ff BREMERTON, WASHINGTON WETLA-Nr� CONTIN _�i ,<� l 4"� / r/ l,� / �l ` 5 / / g �� ,�`•�, V_/ 25 VIS U � � '3 /13 J( � 526` 1 / ,._..% ✓ ! l` ` /�// .525 •:wer. , C � , , �� s...::..:+ ! I (/ I �Z5 t f 1 002 nu.. 015 016 f 7 0 WE.TLANP EXHIBIT I w S z ` R l � � )�y>'i9 t"�•� e� E� T �t1 _ zoo RIM ' ^"/ /I xnt'I I k 50''4*•'1 BUFFER ll0.T k\/ / 0�] WETLAND ` CONTINUES' OVERFLOW `CHANNEL xml NOTES. - PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY MACLEARNSBERRY INC. THE BOUNDARY SHOWN IS FOR GRAPHIC ORIENTATION ONLY, AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEYED BOUNDARY. E.S.M. INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY AS TO ITS ACCURACY. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN IS A SURVEY PROVIDED BY NIES MAPPING GROUP INC. CONSISTING OF AERIAL SURVEY INFORMATION AND LIMITED FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION. ES.M. INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY AS TO ITS ACCURACY. GRAPHIC SCALE 100 200 400 800 ( IN FEET) I inch - 200 ft. rr t I' A89AD 5n A S T I lu Z r>.A. .lulu. d lu 005 I I YdLa 4• P9, a X99 1\10, 4949 I 1 . V,.l I I 004 III 00 CIO \ t \ 004 CONCRETE \ DAM (CULVERT SEALED) \ ,.• � ,,� Imo,, � l Cejry��yy ``\ RyaT~'+ CONCRE E- _ _ / d� DAM�-_� _-`.._,�_,.__:__.__......__..._1�'_�_s!_!�!!--�� 1 ... '12" CULVERT K=],I �A `� 1078 OUT (APP OX. LOCJ ,WA kN-0'T �\ 100o WEfLAN.D \ UFFERr, 'mx "IA VICINR?Y MAP r• F1 C 058 .I zIm L �ry t a rb/.ii" t %t/i'/�,..�._�.....r•�1`N41TA '•`/!S�„�„rr•.,; ` \\ \�\\ ` ``•} „� ' � rpt ' �N t Sg 11 .wiel•w. �`a'/�� � /"��+t �� � (..� �"� . \ ��\ � \ rA•�i M \ � /� ..��• I ' � O �5_' •r t M ,� _ _ 4�\ `� \ \) 'i nr 1 _7^ l 1 i / T %'!•�/ /� `t �___—v.1.' Y``�`.�\\�_, - 1�� ,� t N , ` �\ �..—/ --__ •----/ I '-.._...�. _—' �,w4—sr._. _• �ti 1 ! _ % /' ,�! tel' r q �., y-_'. .,.�„_�.__�--•� �_ 1 t \ .. \` ���/,/,. j TµA 23 026 024 0 1hLEI 'LyLY. -� _- -- _ � 1 f __ ___ W. DAVIS STREET i_._. � ��.- cONTIN EaS Y T / — Y r 1,( I I_ CONT NOES n»S.PlrIYwIY :� 24 X 36 . t 1 1. Acreages listed are for portions of the wetland i= on the West Hills property only. Wetlands 1 004 and 3 extend off the site. Acreage source: MacLearnsberry, Inc. (10/1996). 2. Wetland classification follows Corvardin et al. I 1 i (1992). See text for detailed descriptions. / ✓ Key to wetland plant community classes: II I I. PEM1. = Palustrine, persistent, emergent ------------ PSS1 = Palustrine, scrub -shrub, broad-leaved I 1 deciduous PF01 = Palustrine, forested, broad-leaved deciduous I "Nate: On this drawing: IlWetland continues" is It ' determined by visual observation only. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: APPROX. 267 ACRES I' I i TOTAL WETLAND ARCA: 29.85 ACRES �," I�1� 11I f I , ff BREMERTON, WASHINGTON WETLA-Nr� CONTIN _�i ,<� l 4"� / r/ l,� / �l ` 5 / / g �� ,�`•�, V_/ 25 VIS U � � '3 /13 J( � 526` 1 / ,._..% ✓ ! l` ` /�// .525 •:wer. , C � , , �� s...::..:+ ! I (/ I �Z5 t f 1 002 nu.. 015 016 f 7 0 WE.TLANP EXHIBIT I w S z ` R l � � )�y>'i9 t"�•� e� E� T �t1 _ zoo RIM ' ^"/ /I xnt'I I k 50''4*•'1 BUFFER ll0.T k\/ / 0�] WETLAND ` CONTINUES' OVERFLOW `CHANNEL xml NOTES. - PROPERTY BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY MACLEARNSBERRY INC. THE BOUNDARY SHOWN IS FOR GRAPHIC ORIENTATION ONLY, AND DOES NOT REPRESENT A FIELD SURVEYED BOUNDARY. E.S.M. INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY AS TO ITS ACCURACY. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN IS A SURVEY PROVIDED BY NIES MAPPING GROUP INC. CONSISTING OF AERIAL SURVEY INFORMATION AND LIMITED FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION. ES.M. INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY AS TO ITS ACCURACY. GRAPHIC SCALE 100 200 400 800 ( IN FEET) I inch - 200 ft. rr t I' A89AD 5n A S T I lu Z r>.A. .lulu. d lu 005 I I YdLa 4• P9, a X99 1\10, 4949 I 1 . V,.l I I 004 III 00 CIO \ t \ 004 CONCRETE \ DAM (CULVERT SEALED) \ ,.• � ,,� Imo,, � l Cejry��yy ``\ RyaT~'+ CONCRE E- _ _ / d� DAM�-_� _-`.._,�_,.__:__.__......__..._1�'_�_s!_!�!!--�� 1 ... '12" CULVERT K=],I �A `� 1078 OUT (APP OX. LOCJ ,WA kN-0'T �\ 100o WEfLAN.D \ UFFERr, 'mx "IA VICINR?Y MAP r• F1 C 058 .I zIm L �ry t a rb/.ii" t %t/i'/�,..�._�.....r•�1`N41TA '•`/!S�„�„rr•.,; ` \\ \�\\ ` ``•} „� ' � rpt ' �N t Sg 11 .wiel•w. �`a'/�� � /"��+t �� � (..� �"� . \ ��\ � \ rA•�i M \ � /� ..��• I ' � O �5_' •r t M ,� _ _ 4�\ `� \ \) 'i nr 1 _7^ l 1 i / T %'!•�/ /� `t �___—v.1.' Y``�`.�\\�_, - 1�� ,� t N , ` �\ �..—/ --__ •----/ I '-.._...�. _—' �,w4—sr._. _• �ti 1 ! _ % /' ,�! tel' r q �., y-_'. .,.�„_�.__�--•� �_ 1 t \ .. \` ���/,/,. j TµA 23 026 024 0 1hLEI 'LyLY. -� _- -- _ � 1 f __ ___ W. DAVIS STREET i_._. � ��.- cONTIN EaS Y T / — Y r 1,( I I_ CONT NOES n»S.PlrIYwIY :� 24 X 36 . t Pe r'LAND GLASSIPIGATIONS 4 STANDARD SUFFER RLQUIR04ONT5 # TYPE BUFFER A II loo' B r1 100' G 1 Ill 50' D Ill 50' E Ill 50' F n 1001 G Ill 50' H I!I 50' 1 I1 r 50' J Ill 50' K Ill 50` L III 50' M Ill 50' N It/ 50' D Ill 50' P Ill 50' a 11 100' werLAvn exHisir OF AffeSor HILLS A PORTION OF 5507ION5 21, 28 AND 24, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGF 1 EAST, W.M. RT NOTES — V I. WETLANDS DELINEATED BY ENCO ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2005. 2. FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED NOVEMBER 2005 THROUGH FEBRUARY 2006 WITH LEICA 6P5 1200 1 f 3. WETLAND 5TREAM BUFFER5 DEPICTED HEREON REPRESENT I ii 5TANDARD REGULATED BUFFER5 ACCORDING TO CHAPTER 20.14.220 OF THE BREMERTON MUNGI PAL GODS I �I t4 4 IG 4 4J qI I,FN ill I P VERTICAL DATUM i 1 BASE ON AERIAL / FHOTOGRAMMETRY FROVIDL12 BY OTHERS r , i (OFF SITE) l f x« J T 0.02 acr'bs jjj U WZ915 w I 9 5f. r -.i f ,f ) J ' SECTION C,ORNOR j, f I Iwf* , OF 21, 26, 2q E 20 HIGH POI i ,`' ' i0��♦ \• 1,5 ` ❑" 0, A1 1 h CITY OF ORZMERTON, KITSAP COUNTY, AASHINGTON cre i r , Grp.! I I 1 , 1\2.11 ac 6 AI�03 .F. I I YVR-ANP 10& 4.26 o&ee 184,64q $.f. t Lye LMI L7I I L I ; , I � 1 1 t 1 \ I / / I I \ Lti0 f ul 06q �' II! ,0 _j ♦ t , P9 �• r �O arae : � I a1 Ff5/TE I I I I I I I i I I I I IOT I , i i _l38IL -ji i114 � 143 i 13q I 071 I I I I I I � I 11 I I I I I 1 I I/ °wPRFPAR W FORM TRIWAY ENTERPR15E5, LL -6 ISM JPA7A AlRgA 202.60 acres — TOTAL 15.40 acres (ON SITE TOTAL) I NATIONAL I I Q CULVERT APPROXIMATE LOCATION (5EE TABU) II �7UARn' I I VOL. � pq�' XE -ea WETLAND FLAG ARMORY I �I _ _ I h\ ® SOIL PLOTS TE HIGH POINT/LOW POINT AFF 5/TE) APPROXIMA ,,q acres Ift545rs.P. WETLAND BOUNDARY I" /� I I _ H— •� • —N CENTERLINE AND DIRECTION OF STREAM WITH END BLG N ,rL I it / - / �� 2 I I I — ... — DITCH 216 —300 CONTOURS PER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS ------------- CONTOURS FER KIT5AP COUNTY RECOR05 20' WIDE INGRESS, 1 GRE55 AND UTILITY L-A5EMENT k i d r— GRANTED TO 5EATTLE 5M5A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PER AUDITOTR'5 F/LE NO. 157081700-56 w 'IC4, VI Li4 B roo ool °j A" ♦ 1\ ]� 1 I �, ` � , � / % ;/; ( X11 `,,� �•``�M\ �'a_. ,\� , I I -� e N I �/ NATIONAL dUARD � n — — — — — —1311.99 ,6 . 4 .Fla q ♦�—I-------- ----�------ ia I s 7' 37 i ITE) / ooef 1 Y GULVER73 AT 6RAVF.L ROAD # TYPE DIRECTION LENGTH FALL QI 24" HDPE 5 60°W 60' 414" Q IS" GMP 5 70E 30' /1,911 QQ 24" IRON 5,22-E 35' 27 I/2" ® IS" GMP 544°E 41' 22" Q5 15" GMP 5 59E 41' W. © 24" GMP SOUTH 51' 11" Q7 15" HDPE 5 156E 24' 2" © 12" CAST IRON N 137 K/T5AP / i 1 V I — � \ -------- 79 - -�I I_ A r�- 1\ I I x-rFNrA I /-, 1 /C i / / 1 06q / i 1 V I — � \ -------- 79 - -�I I_ A r�- 1\ I I x-rFNrA I SCALE? 1"=200 FEET 0 100 200 400 :per U79 y+ BTER: f��L LAlS05 nrn� a/z>/2aoe HATTON GODAT PANTI ER ENGINEER$ AND SURVEYORS 1840 BAFtNES BOULEVARD S W TUMWATER, WA 96512 TEL: 360.943.1599 FAX: 360.357.6299 EEP hattonpantler.com 05-135 E 19' 4" Q Iz" GAsr IRON s to°w q' 3" ® 18" MOOD 5 10°W 20' 6" SCALE? 1"=200 FEET 0 100 200 400 :per U79 y+ BTER: f��L LAlS05 nrn� a/z>/2aoe HATTON GODAT PANTI ER ENGINEER$ AND SURVEYORS 1840 BAFtNES BOULEVARD S W TUMWATER, WA 96512 TEL: 360.943.1599 FAX: 360.357.6299 EEP hattonpantler.com 05-135 I 1 4 4,* flir - - .........._ , tc:,....__ )1..20--. ....1 *...140 0 4.416 1 „AsiE------ \-3 7_,-)„.„ . + 0, „, 1080 +18'1\1082 r' 11;N, ..4-,%\.\\ *+ 1 \..),:\ "ii \(,,,,,,\ -~-* -,..,,,t * j: S.\\ Subject Property_ \\/-1) ; 18 14006C--1 , 1Q $• iell . / ,,, D '''''Ilislik N A,\\ s \,,,,, ( s ip.i,.8; 1 �'' P FR. mar,NumbitrThriri IIIIt 1 ::::,,,,",--1)\)", ,es...;j ; - -<- 1110\ \ l x i 1\211-3 .3(/) ! tw,:iiA . ir'"1 " 01948 + 1181,040 '\ 4:18110:"fil IA. 1 (30../..;/? e'' Ai ''''''''''''\-,—_j f; 'K.-‘, , / gLi 'q , --/ 'F ) k,... F " w a, ,r (1 n I 1 Parcel#s: 21240130072009 &29240110182002 State Water Type Map Figure 10 Water Type: Triway Enterprises—West Hills Development Ns=Non-Fish Bearing—Seasonal(Type 5) Bremerton WA 1 Np=Non-Fish Bearing—Perennial(Type 4) F=Fish Bearing(Type 2 or Type 3) Y S=State Shoreline (Type 1) 0 1" + 11.nk.ico P.O.Box 731747 I ________ Environmental Puyallup WA 98373 U=UnknownPuyallup 253.841.9710. 253.841.0264 fax IMap Source:Department of Natural Resources Water Type Map IPhase I& II Environmental Site Assessments • Remediation Services • Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration • Environmental Permitting S31M1 deW aIII m Is.gsld io luewliedeO alms :aoJnog deW t co' 0 N r000`Z=r,t :alga,alewlxojddy 4, ..t 0 N011Y001 VDIV illii ► Ia71M tilSE c �rr �� . 3�r710ol lu Iu+ml+da0f uaJXryaoM . 1q fr -- _.-- ZOOZ860440tiZ6Z8 600ZL00£60�Z4Z :s# la3aed1 � 11111111111141 xey 49Z0'148'£SZ •01.L6'I.178'£9Z uoi��aodao� 1 £L£86`lM dnlleAnd I>v1uuxuo.a3nu3 11 sluff uoi}oaS itJ0 U8AUI spunitem IDuol{0N LP 4£L x09'O'd O.-DU sluff dIysuMol a0uasaJd ys11 {uaplsad ti{uoud l U0I I losad alooS 000'6Z I FIM uol.zauza.1g ID su1DaJ}S pun sJanld a0uasaJd ys11 snowoJPDU l{IJoIJd luauldoianaQ slim lsarn —sastadaalug ic1 MU1, :siogwAS iagl0 snD DI01 a 1,1, ain6i j s}e4igeH/sai3eds A}!Joiad a;e;s * SJa}Ua0 a}IS IMO plods .001041 sig6!1 AJela!JdoJd s,Mia% loaioid o} AJessaoau A!geuoseau sainpaooJd Ile vim aouepJaooe u! uo!iewiolu! AJela!idoud se paleaJI XJO}IJJal (c–( Snto}S IDI01{I0) * Imo Sioadsal !le u! Is suo!leool put uo!Iewiolul al!IptIM pug qs! ysllgD}s3 0l D}0O {u9ioIJ4nsul sJa}uaO a}IS IMO pa}IodS an!IIsuaS ayi to JOUMO an!snloza all s! MGM •It!luap!luoo aq 01 mod SaOJI UaUJa6DUD M a Od -ai 6u!huedw000e put dew sill uo padelds!p suo!itool Iii!9t9 put sap ads sapmo I w Imo P II S an w suss SJap!Suao tMi6M) al!!PI!M put ys!J to luawliedao uol6u!yseM (saIIS Aou0dn000) AJo}uial paysllgDls3 , ,, s}ulod }alaJJnw paw E 6u!Adoo put uo!loadsu! )!lgnd woJl uo!lewJolu! SaOJI UalUa6DUD M a Od al!IPI!M Pue qs!i aA!l!Suas sidwaza (OLE'Ll'il M7y) Mel aleis uoi6u!gseM S910.1!0 } w Imo P II S •uo!inq!Jis!p leJaua6 'col lou a.e siJodau 6u!Auedwo3e 041 pug dew s!4J SIUIOd }o}IgoH A}uoud Q 310N 3SV31d SIO sao(nJaS A olougoej uollga olu( MNOM Aq pau;I(saa dew 000? '90 Jaquieoaa – alga uo(lonpotd s}ulod e6008H a}gpl!M A{IJ01Jd ® (G?QVN) 995 auoZ fno5 auE(d alglS – UJals6S aleuipJoo3 000'6? : I – a1goS dew SJapDog uo6Aiod (SHd) iz9,-lbZ 8 Z NO I Z 3 I S 3101II Z 1, 10 A J.I N 13 I A 1 H Z NI s}ulod 96DIP9H atlPl!M Jayt0 sa!oadS pup s{D}IgDH ti}uolm :sa{aadSISTefgell xag10 :sapad5isleligeH AU1oi1d d V I1 Si 4i14 /IC (1 \14V CIV 1 1 , VII UN D11 ddik aJHP1mM Pue gm 10 ivauliiedaU uoi5utgseM Ir • � / ot ' � /' "(�ye/ l ,-✓: -fIr 'r .,, \q,.-, : SM ,e1� r9v J , - %�n'` - 'S rtt4 :-,tN°' I (f o )., ,� _J -,- r," , q• ��//1 ` �`I , ,+I. r) - 77.---_,,,-.....---_-_. 1 ` c�i _,/,'1. k i� .. .•-4,r ��t, lam • •• � 1 '_4' /...r:.-11 ir- ; = '`' ar ,r �, 7-}icer- • ♦•• ,%j/ C -7-f ,, " ti L£U95oZLLb . /: I I I I W ____.,--' _r-- 1......,,,,---) i PUGEf S r r. RVI low 04. 4 . ......, . II - 0 Subject Property--..—P \ ' 011. • P 1.• . t ,.,,-- A k. . i e:. M % fir- \ Ar -.4111111111111144ki . : , IIIIIIP.0 , I I II ' Parcel #s: 21240130072009 &29240110182002 Local Fish & Wildlife Habitat Figure 12 Triway Enterprises—West Hills Development IBremerton WA I 0 r ÷ EnCo P.O.Box 731747 Puyallup 98373 IMIIIIIM Environmental Corporation 253.841.9710• 253.841.0264 fax N Map Source: Kitsap County Critical Area Map IPhase I&II Environmental Site Assessments • Remediation Services• Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration • Environmental Permitting I I RTABLES TABLE 1: Wetland Characteristics (APPENDIX B) I TABLE 2: TABLE 3: Normal Environmental Conditions, Atypical, and Problematic Areas Dominant Hydrophytic Vegetation Species in Wetland Plots TABLE 4: Dominant Vegetation Species in Non-Wetland Areas ! TABLE 5: Hydric Soil Indicators Identified in Wetland Plots , TABLE 6: Soil Characteristics in Wetland Plots (<12" bgs) TABLE 7: Penetration Resistance (psi) in Wetland Test Plot Soils I TABLE 8: TABLE 9: Wetland Hydrology Indicators Identified in Wetland Plots Rational for Determining Non-Wetlands TABLE 10: WADNR Natural Heritage Program - Database Results ITABLE 11: WDFW Priority Habitats & Species Program - Results 1 I I 1 11 1 •I 1 1 1 11 I Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation,Mitigation&Restoration I � m w I VVV EnC0 Environmental Corporation I I I APPENDIX B TABLES I 1 a I I I I 1 I I I Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration I I en w v) • 9 w w CO v ea I- to W • co >- Z C ii 111 d ~;06 a.t � a)re w ° I- V I- Q H Q re I � � � a 3 a Z Z w ,, I . N O D m ccoo ccoo C) a) d tx < 0 N N w e a � � (7) (7) vain° Iy N Z ✓ o 0 d y co oZ per c c v) Z d 0 co U) o o ZV ° NopY Z CD —I re Z - w `nc•n Oc'' to u di o• u- Na) a1iNoa�2i0ggo °'• mCnac2o I LIEN w o �; c .- Z 0 C7)- •- � g U d o C M COL- o wa) Zelcoo Q2 , co o cmow ow a6 L uW c m U6 U)cCO c .� Wa < ami > . owa> d m ' 00 cu -- u. c < _N r V 2 c E a� a) m N cc0 E E C ) I _-0 w _ m - t0 O I ., a) o � a) cL -•-• --.=• U) U) 2U) 0O U) U) m U) as V H c. mco o!fO re L re o a ocoLU C9 — ,- I ~ N0)0w m c .11 c < Q isi CO 0 R Q () ._ re ao IC cc oo Z Z 0 > co 700 0 I mea a a D _ � = -ou) a70 o _ -oo � co C) c a) L a) ui IC.) .— i') U mmZE ci00 ,„ii i Cl) >,_ = m (OUcocn� I ._ IA F J O LL N N (/) 0) C9 O H ch u)Q Z r- U. o o o ~ a 7; Q O cn a. I I c0 d co w Cl) •.c, a of ro CO O. z — z 2 � CD 1- 2I- 1- 1 U m .c` ' m 3 _ v I O2 n! a) _ 3 Z Z `Q U P Z *� I— a I d, va) 0 re Du_ I— aa) we ti Qo a O 0. iii 65 CO I oti 0 ) c Z Z a) 0 I j2 1:3 ea) 0 d c CO o c ZU � � o ' v) ZZ mV a W — � ZIw a) iiirz vLou, U Oce: m .. N 'i I ItO co W CD y W W V o y .� cn . N Z Lra W >+ H Q H Q r � � � Q ,:r Q re M MQa) V . � Z I � JQ C 0. ° oLEz [L CO as m V a) I 0 Q. et Q Q N a) W e CL o 4. in 0) N Z I a ^ en 0CO c Z VO a) _ HC C 0 6'. � o 0iii 3d ,J - O O U Z V SN O oO fn ZZ 0 6- N ilit tL Oaflflflhllbil m Uw co -, r Q < a) OW a) Cl) tl m "O N CoO � UIt � 'OWQ O 'rn 03 L0 I O o CO a O CO a) a) a) 7 E C � 0) 0) Icn00a) 0) m u) U II w E N J c4 °ti 22 } O Ce H N oM W 0 = I m C)O FW- — N ea U to > C) c -a cee. a0 1co Cl) c cn o cp C _ _ aa) c O Z• z CD W m OS G � m € Ce "a 4r° F Q Q a) -�' Cl.)Jani ° cmm (5 V 1) a) 2 o iti C� m a`8imZ E a a-Ew m m � a) iii 0 0 a) > c.0 � cnUinin3 I ^N WCU H W N V) VT O H IM to Q Z O tit 7. V � � a) J a I coII U1 CO LU w co 'v � } y a _LU vaoti rtU.1 ▪ L. m a Q < Z a 1 I Zo < Za c=.) `p_ a. c zZ re EE J I lu. a a N 2O— co a s w e a in in NZ I ad . coN z o D o Cl) _0 111 s- la m = N o ovU0LooZo m 2 co co OJ ( � _ zy Locv0o6 Ocs: N ai y Q.= u. `'(\I a) a`� o CU g ED c. o)Q _ ac I v d0mc = mi2oUC) ZQOC) rn2 co = .- CO N = RIW C m ia .> Z CICU c0i CU re > -8 NN ° X � V iri a) m . .� U - a' co c0 •r. � � QCCQ OW N L O 73 Cl)aoQ a) co oCO ft° m o � t cu ao - o m Cl) p t � CncnIcnO0 � � inin m cn — U III W cH J R � i W >- apew o _ 1._ c of O w - o C rN -- < Q ii CO U RI > 0 a Ico m u) 0 IfZ aa) _o FQ < as 0 m m MO 0 a (D V0 V = PmE mai EL E m w mfy aaicaO I coOco Lu LU I N i N H c') ~ M c OZ Ou. u. O O O Ts 70 O a) J a. I I N I m H W WCO CO a a W II- CO M .L N 2.' 0 ;a v o IL O. collLO ir� Z W iH J 0 0. I Q 111 a cr Q aco c 2.) UJ a 33 Cr) v) � Z ad I cz 0 N L.a) .0 -0 O N 0 N) a) Z Imy � --�J oo c 0 ZU0io0 W COZ co WmZ inN � pY O6401 U-> h.m - U � viU) .c c .� � ami > v= a) u) �X3 (� O N c � U O •i it X Q a) > O W 0 I WV °' �sC ci:a 8o mm � ma`Qi 3cncoi 3 3 cn e ca co Ja, w I Q w I— a aGa. caI 3 :!' a� U a) 4- CU Q a) E 3 f I f O 0 c c1'co VU 0 foam 1 Wax Nii U L. y 0 c/)0 ci) 1 ID ii co F- H N II-) U.? N V) O N cO c o 0 0 w 0 o C di co a — I coI II V) ILI N zc }an `� Ca w iv W co I— H RSH H Hcoo V ° oT a Mo a = o 2 LO Q) I .��Ma z 0 Q tea.= V O Q O z I. EM Q N p � y co ca •• V a i2 < a 2 � � We a � � in in z° vai n I a) z z I i � O aO co .ui 0 .84 g e .c,,,, in 0 .., 4 c oma) Ore zU � NoY z +- >, W in Z <n aiii LL Lo U O c • 1 O (Nj i 0 E to LL ON C W N O N O _°c) Oc EQ _ a C ;:, 0O a) c n cm Oatz O .5 '�._ min cp to ` +=' K m N a) z a) 2 >,Q O c 0 c W '- W a) •L m V W 3 > i4 � m c .� � N > -8 Ocn 9. )C ) C) l= - -o ) 2otfU 2 -,_ u_ � „ re < OW N I v 11 rn c E _ � U � � o) to i 0 2 mcoNall a) � coc� EE c CU N `) O 0 a) C t mIrD I'— — CO N 7- m Ii V cnc=n2u)0O 33ini I I Ito 111 Nco .� V W W V a CO u d H 2 Q W V w L H Q Q co � 0 Q Q = III i o g Q i A. ,3 - ZZ QW Z 0 A. Q F-- •Z Z. I- E Q - T. v) O 0 LI_ v) co 0 c d cc Q 0 a � � in vain° 1 II 08 ^ co a) z L v D o � O Z ,rp c c oao o � N `n z° d CJ to 0 0 o ZU ,� NooY Z mN ._ R in _ Z :.. �n Ocam: N L c va W Lo- ca)iii mo � 0 :- -5.0 .cminaca 0 0. 0 0 c = rn12o 5 � ZQ S co � rnF- ,— � r) = v W m iri 03 c V W 0 > a) > o W a� w m t V — Nod O f0 •- L � Q �' Q N Na) - = C = COccom � ° � � � m � � mco o ` a) o a) o r a) m 2 a) . E C.1 t U) U) 2 cn O O in cn m w U N ^ J 05 L } m t' oO Q 0NuJ 0 = ~ 73 0 w0 W N C .., GCDOS Q ili al v .o 0 Ce a co d co ^ O Z Z70• c o f6 0 a) • = Q < 176 a i J E C ( H O Ym C�' V m N21 C • O E III Ew m � Niii U5 > - cnUcn � ^W W +.: N I- 1- N N 0 I— Q Cl)I �Q coZ o O o O u.O .o I cco d (D 0 i" I 111 NNIii W co - • No N Z 11 ( N Ndca L CL ILI HOW Q U4H = Lea I- a Q co +' 0Q 2 Q _ � _ 2 0 , oa V , .5 F- z Z W >^ J .o Q. m Z .. I- • EE Q 71 II •i N O 0u_ y co co W e 6. R Q 0 2 IL in in cool I oa CO N O Z 0 a) — d 43 N 0 a) •• O Q o c \ Z O .,... c = Cl) O OO V Z V 0 0 0 Z = 4' 03 Ln _ Z :.. �nc� � � Y Oc,• co`N •— cn N iri LL U -0 . RI A W - c c 0. @ c .. Q c Q >.cv in � c rn o N y co - � a) O_ a) oa) - - ocmipdco L g g c W O c .� Z O S5 rn� V ypy m mLON Q � 00vEui W ;7.s �( m O Z a >, o N o X •L v W U � w c c .� w � Q ami > � C a) N m L Coati >as L_ .. ..O 3 < N T.; rn cE — � caoU = ccEE to t co Q _ (0 c0 N — U y co (0 (0 (0 •- — L �' y O W L f0 O. O L m a) a) 7 E 3> in cn m cn U 0 3> 3> u) in m cn , COU 11 W coN ._) J co °a 2. c3) >- t- < N 0NW C9 = d 0)0 W — N 13 C 0 Q `ri CC m u m o CD Ts v p• it rem o III Q J cn co N 0 .0 c m Cu - V a)m ai V mai _ W c0Ct Diii 0N v )Ocn : I ^ W W • N in H a Lo V Z co. wr O 8 M Q O O O p 0 I- 1 I III 0 _ w co v Q. „a a a Co I N d °a °'co W a RS ~ H ~ ~ Q L a) a < I 0 � � Q v Ict I Zo oa En U '5 — Z W ItH Q ,O C re Z Z E E U a� I d mm do EL i75 65 CoZ I od va) co o D o O L Z J y b o 1 ZVptop .8..... u) ZZ m• N CJ in z . � cncN � � Oc': M L . LL. >+N of 0 N 0 o c C m Q - ~ I V N 0 W a) a) a� o -5)-9-s m � d3 � c � o c • O � d 0 d c z Ca 112 o 0 CZQ aoi v Ca I— O � a) �.) r+ m Z >,— 7 W N U ._ K w a co .L CO• � W C —0 Lt iii C •O 0tie — N > N > N O LU a) i c U c c °) (n tU E ' to' EE c CU eo O I caom 0U) cu co CD WL co aotm a) a) m " 2 CD •5 E _ .c � cncn = cn ( O i: 3> inin w cn .- 0 i 03 0Q L 1 0 r re0 F- c O u) W C7 . I mcm W - N C l�0 C Q iii O m > V O C d r a) 17- a)d w Ic0 7 o Z U CD 0 Q Q co o m r � � 1 C) 0 �o . V U V �m E I ucocC a) iri U 11) v, v )O0) � - III co W N LI. a) F- co - Q c) O H Nu)< Z o O o O u.O . 111 a ~ mo _1- oV 1 I I in w � ' 0w w co va eI7- 0 '41 a N. O .O a cF- w ..--, Z2 0 11J co c:C a a v •- L � _ Q ~ Q V 2 `t re2 z„3R zoo Q ("6. a Q •� � z IX *ki_ Q I •o Cl)a. 0 re Z ~ as E U a 0 co acdi � we Qo O. 3> 3> in in cant° I co U) H N N -Ng D oo Z I7 d c as u) b oo U zVLo _ oo cn Zz m � 4.. w L � Z .- miriscEi) p � f/j Q LI. T N iii '` c c0 a o c c iin Q _ 0 c en LL o c o m o m o cmina c� IC d O_ m o � zQ � � .�H � W N K w. w co p a� m W ,L O t, m UdE iri � t c .� W0Q ami > woW a� w m t N Co� U 11 0 0 �' Q N I c 0) Umcc c (n 17.) O = co as - 5 co aim as co 1 o � t m aoL a) m 2 2 ' .c i> incn = cnUO 3> 3> inin m cn - 0 WE ea � J ea ca O) >- 03 Q L 'V '7) p ..+ ONIli (9 = I ~ d c Q FW- — 0 vi 0 IC R 7cu o N II o m o t a�u �-� m > 'CZ_ z Dw C eo , 4(-0 c F Q Q J -' E " p p Doi, maui°DZE m Eu- m co 0) iii O O N Iii ( a . m I cn O co co W -J N �' N u) .� "t O I- d 1 (i)0 < Z O It p O p p H IC oN d a 1 I � III W CD.2 v W U) Cl) U Q v a a P I cocio a) CO ~ L. ~ Q H Q i r..0 faLCID O IZ _ CNV = _O � Q �3 •� z°Z Q cx 0 .o a - Z .. 4t H Q CC 33 22 WC 0. ( 0) CI) Z I od H a) co Lea o D c Z CD ZSa) O O p. CJ O O U ZVOOpo fn ZZ ti) m ai a min Zin a) iiia .. m� `oV Oc I U tic C to LL0 " c .- - N a) •U a) O N .O C C m Q _ ~ C ' = rn ` o 'a C) ZQO ° amOa co m a) a) Za) a3j,— = 2Uaf- `- * w ' = v W C i I 1N O _ ' w U) 0 a CL a y •� 11 cn � nc d m eay• °', Q W V :1-1-1 a_ to/ H Q Q Q 0 ++ ((j Q Z Q • e1 Z :t_ .8 zZ < Q a 0 z >. •`o n. , z 1 E E Q Id N 22 < 0 U) co co W e CL 3: 3: 65 65 vain! Io!S cn ac• N c Z ▪ 0 o Iam asZ• d v) o o 0 zL) LoNo0Y Z . mm O -� � _ z a � � Q .. H Qw a L.: N a� N -6.--- o � 0 .o .cc mQ _ a � V w o y c m rn � o � ZQ2 -g cco ° �m — = :+ K w to 7 w L • CO W C m TO cii `n -c c .7. W � Q N > � o W a) a m4' a7 Cpjf (.) ZUEt1D -0aQ N C.) a cE 1-oo -i-..)OUamccEE c — i I0 co `p 13 C N m N (0 CO CU N Jt inu) 2c000 � � inv) m cn 1 Wto N- Jojfa. } H47. UO O ) W Wc 0)NC _ I QC < c• Q iii CO U 0 .o I co c c o c �o O Z_ Z_ a) c 03 D cn c o CC re asm • Q Q O � cE a) Ja0OvcoCUV coa) 0 V 21 IV CO rn E Eu- w w iimce a) OON 11 (4 ! n (13 WUcW ...; NNN NF i v) co o H co p u.. I- '0 II c to co J O d d �. 1 I I U) to W t) v w w 0 2 I c W W r�_+ ~ f- Q Q Q I 1 II" a z < _ `� — I 0 as C) To z ° .� � z re * }- a a 2 Qa F2 W e a � � cncn cant° 1 ) 0 0 0) u) 0a)c Z v ` : D o O al Z op d .fl -0ti I "dc6 cn - No `n.. oQo o \a o 0 Uo � Ocno n O ZZ o _ LU . N ,Q u. > N iri 'cccopoccrnQ _ ac y N N O N - - O c f0 V d O E C D cm i2 O V 0 Z Q E E m U -5)H W >>N y = IC W m al _,..,> Q03 o Nre N c) -0 a) u) oX > •L V ULc ui0) c — W orQ N >Et < O W O 0 CO c -° .- ESU ( (jug. o < cn O CD 2 m@ � ° � N � mccoc—cuco m — L a � _E m Fp. 7-1 =, 2 ' .5 E i .0.. RI ca cncn = cnOO 336565 m GO t U T 0V L Q) CO 0 re ' v r ; 0 CC 0 (0W W = C 0 CA 4-0 N � T.-, < Q iri V U c -a � � n°. III a ca 0 yc N m I 7a O Z o o > vC fr mai o Q Q J a f0 (0 IA 0 V h N O` N d C� 0 mNmZ - I E W m m � N iii 0 0 coOcooin � 1 N L J N tT v N -r o I— N I � � Q Z o 0 0 O o co ICes 1-m OJ v 0. 1 1 1CO w 'U COM W CO CO 0 — I 0 y a Z - cnU 'm 0 m I W ILI aI- i_Of Q ~ Q L t m ►n � I 11`II eoV a g3g x = 3 �a I Zo a coa U Z WF. J A. Q. Z .. EE Q 1 0 a N — Qp CO ) 2 W e a � � U) � co z° r 0 ^ s U c Z m1111 s- .Q H e c ? O Q c o fn coH cco v� o co u) CJ Lot a)N u N . a I v m O 0 �' D chi_ o o � zQO , 12 0 rnH _ 2 =-,Lu as w• y = cultic U � UWc > 0 W• m � u) s c c N oa) CD t LI) 066 O u.(13 � .0IXQ N'Li1i VRI a 0 = CE - Iii aUccEE c0) _ ni o oo . cc -oTp - 03 = r (0 u ) m ZV� uIUOO 6Zco I m y • G ce I Oft) W 0 c. = o y _ Q W -- (V a w (2 U r ¢ 0c 1co d a) u) o 3 II u_ O Z m Z a)c I � o E 4 _ 41) c m 140 V g• No mE 1 Vim" m E•• w @@ � a) ifO c�U cn � 1 ^ . W H ill N t. N (0 co '7 HM 1 U) C Z o u- o Oo O O F' 12 1 ~ — - Z OJ 1 I I N H W Cl) '0 V W Cl) — C.) a) co Q. a y a 2 I N � m 0 6OS ci. W � � Q W 0 �- I— 1— Q < I eix ta - o Q 3 Z Q = ea _ }I O g Qac I '3 v F Z Z W Z >' J •O a Z .. I- EE Q i o d N a0 al_i W c a � � tn. canto I od „ - to) y c z o D o 00 m � �l c c •z o < o 00 cnZ I dOJ N o of ZV , N0oY z M ._ re � _ z .v a `nom 06.. m v1 C. N a) O a0i °c' c °'a _ d co U) i = E co LL O iii c •a) .,.., Z i- O •� .5-2 c oa ir) _ 111 V d O y rn o aa) coo < 2 (3125 co W o W a) L 3 V W CO V Ncnt c � WEtQ N > � b a) d m F L O «SU � '"iLL " ‹t N � � � c BULL � � fn aca vs `—° Eco m � cOa) � - ooEE = rd O a) 0 CO �Q 0 L.. m N a) N " 7 E 3> Z5cn7c) OO i> 3> cnin m cn Os U 111 0W E otSL � J e4 MId L0 - 0 <I i— _ r O y W 0 = N N d C co V ea• Q V 13 re a° IC al a) w I O P OZ_ z o o 0c M c VcT) m co VU manic° D- mCC w15 6iU � cnUcni II a 17; FW- 111 F ..J N LL N 7 O < 1- in Z O O O O O 32 O O co ,r, m a_. 1 I u2. v2 w w U C. C m 0. z 2 I a � � a te < o_cD Ill � ~ < ` ea . � in W ' if) Q 3 0- a 3 .� = Z° a - a To p. Z w J �p w Z w E E Q I -4 u)N 0 0U. N amiC we a 2 < 0 a C7) C-7) NZ I 06 " a, tp a, z v n o O L Z c < o 0 0 0 111 = d CO N N o co .cNi ZUo � oo � ZZ � N O _! ,_ �n _ Z = � "' N 'nLc)CO Oce• - a,, - tL �N � 6moaad, a "cr)a _ ac U) i c E ( LL o vi C '°� " Z LO U � o am - � . Q) O d N = N N �,a ? W W • vW c m U iii u) c BUJ < N > � ow a) N U) mI c -0 w c °oO � U � o � C < m I V ea co 2 c E as = 10 a�a co � m c c E E c _ zz CD � L al ao cm a� m E a - iinmzcnOO ii in in m Cl) U W J U °6 o � rn > m u7 OL H4- 0CDW C9 = IIIa: a)0 I — N co U iri Q 0 c Iea d rno O Z Z m _ 70 p o o v I J o 117. Ce a J m O .CCD .--0 so C) � a) oai V U m �m E I 0 n. E mcc a3 zii U , a� cnUin � w I a LL N H N- co caU1Q Z N LL O N O O IC A o^ m J I 1 co M W0 co co v ti W co V H WN fl a F- i RI to O ai 0- V 33 r Z• Z W J It I- •LI. Q—a, Qa y N 2w e a in in a) z° +oN coz u_It = o O L.. co Z cH o o a o I = d C u) 0 V ZO0v) po N Zz m N C J ce ' . Z _.- a) ••.u � N � co Q O C viQ> 'Na) � a) omclo "E)).° cma - ac fA to ar W O E) O .. rn.O .c m 4) I c) to 0O 0 c D o) 12 O aai 2ZQg j za U 2W oW a) D as = m U *W � �t c .� Wiy < a > � QW a) d m � v N c '' (X) -E u_ � u. < N V -O 0 I c ia .@ o (> > c cn.c fA IICU L. (13 ----...-.4 N L CD a o m a) a) N E M > 65U) 2E O O 3> i> 65c4 m up � U _ I M � W o1I i � >- J m 0 'r�' v , 0 ctOPD t/ tit W = M C D• c Q 4.0 r» co 7.1 cu co 7 ..., _ O C • z z CO N E 0 0 m a Q Q � E a� 13 o c -0 (93 0 U . $2 VU U m. COE I a � iii °' Eu- mcc a) w05 (nU� � I LU LU - F_ N . v Co M 9 co 1- a) I 0 i— •a H a 2 0 n. - r 0 1 V EnC0 Environmental ' Corporation i 1 APPENDIX C IFIELD DATA FORMS I I I 1 1 Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services■Wetland Delineation,Mitigation&Restoration I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton 1 Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.07.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:10:30-11:30 Plot#: 1 Plot Diameter: 20' ® Wetland B ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes Z No Weather&Notes: I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status OSee following page I H H W Iø W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,and/or FAC: ' Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .08' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,branches,seeds,roots I N A: .4' 0.17' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey mucky loam,fine roots,saturated None B: 1.5+ 0.5' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey mucky loam,saturated None 0.83' 10YR,4,2 Dark grey brown silty loam with fine sand,loose,saturated 7.5YR,4,4 7% 1.0' 2.5Y,4,4 Olive brown fine sand,loose,saturated 10YR,4,6 7% 1 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq. in.): I 3" 20 I 6" c 50 1 9" 60 1 12" 80 1 15" 6 95 1 18" 80 1 21" 105 1 24" c 275 ii IPrimary Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaciuepts Drainage Class Poorly Included Series Shalcar Muck (50)Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix .4' ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions 2.5' ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ® Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) on roots ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: IGround surface inundated? ®Yes ❑No Surface water depth: .6' Slope(down): SW R1% Hole depth: 1.5' } C9 Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .1' Io J ® Inundated 1-3'center ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems_<.5'ft E ®Saturated s 12" ®Adventitious roots ®Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves C3 ❑Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations [1]Morphological adaptations I = ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials 2003 ®Other Ponding>1'ft ❑Surface scouring ® Drift lines(to the SW) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes:deeper water SW in center I I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? 0 Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophytic vegetation in representative plot 0 Present 0 Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? E g Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicators)in representative plot 0 Present 0 Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM ` Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesl s! Address Bremerton i 'Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 11/7/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29,24N, 01E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 10:30- 11:30 Plot#:I PlotDiameter: 20' '[VI Wetlandef_ i NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator II ( /o) l Status j (—°4) a u Alnus rubra T 60 FAC Typha latifolia [ H 20 OBL Physocarpus capitatus S 40 FACW- 1 Carex deweyanna H 15 FACU IRubus spectabilis S 40 FAC+ Rubus ursmus wUfolius H 15 FACU Lonicera mvolucrata S 20 FAC+ i ( Dr Rhamnus purshiana S 20 FAC- I0 Thuja plicata S 20 I FAC Z Juncus effusus H 55 FACW Carex obnupta H 45 OBL 111. i Oenanthe sarmentosa H 25 OBL Solanum nigrum H 20 FAC+ L Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% I I I I I I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE QN-SITEWETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.07.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 11:30-1:00 Plot#: 2 Plot Diameter: 30' ® Wetland 4 ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Off-site wetland#4 I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Gravel road to S,graded edges,ditched at SW Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Depressional pond north of abandoned reservoir I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status O See following page II-- W Iw _ IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC',andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .05' Duff layer: leaves,grass,twigs p A: .35' 0.17' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown fine-med muck,silty sand,saturated None I N 0.5' 0.83' 2.5Y,4, 1 Dark grey sandy with fine gravel 1/8",loose,saturated None None 1.0' 2.5Y,4, 1 Dark grey sandy fine gravel'/4",loose,saturated <2% I 1.5' _ None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 3" , 35 I 6" 30 1 9" ; 40 1 12" , 70 1 15" , 60 1 18" ri 40 1 21" , 160 1 24" , 140 IPrimary Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly Included Series Shalcar Muck (50)Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix I ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Strong .2'—1.0' ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 1 ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >_ Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑ No Surface water depth:>3'in center Slope(down): SW 1-2% Hole depth: 1.4' 0 Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .7'rising 0 I J ® Inundated >3'ftix marks .3'ft ®Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <.5'ft ®Saturated<_12" ®Adventitious roots ID Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves 0 ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials 2003 ®Other Ponding>3'ft ®Surface scouring ® Drift lines(to the W) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present i JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No j IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesi—I ! Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 11/7/2005 Legal: „21, 28,29,24N, 01E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 11:30-13:00 Plot#:Z PlotDiameter: 30' Iv] Wetland yf 1 NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Off-site wetland 4 Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes Gravel road to S ditched as SW Is the area a potential problem area? No 111 Weather and Notes: • ( ) Identified Plant Species ° ; Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator T 25 FAC (-%) Status p Stratum ' Status 1H Thuja plicata 1 Athyrium filix-femina H 20 FAC Alnus rubra T 20 FAC Epilobium ciliatum H 20 i FACW- I111 Salix hookeriana S 60 FACW- Equisetum arvense H 20 ! FAC S iraea dou lasii S 30 FACW i Juncus tenuis striata m Rubus spectabilis S 35 FAC+ H 20 FACW+ DP 9 f I H 20 FACW- ' ' I - S 25 FAC Triticum sp H 15 None 0E Rosa nutkana z Juncus effusus H 45 FACW Carex obnupta H 30 OBL Typha latifolia H 30 OBL I Ranunculus repens H 25 1 FACW Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% I I I I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of! I ROTlNEON-SITE WETLAN©DETERM{NASION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:2:20-4:20 Date: 11.07.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Plot#: 4 Plot Diameter: 20' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No II Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status ZO See following page I r---H W 0 I au I Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FACT,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma ....1 0: .15' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,branches,roots,seeds O A: 0.17' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey mucky silty loam,loose,saturated None I N 0.5' 10YR,2,2 Black mucky silt loam,loose,saturated None 0.83' 2.5Y,4, 3 Olive brown silty clay,wet 7.5YR,4,6 7% 1.0' 2.5Y,4,4 . Olive brown silty clay,charcoal,very damp 7.5YR,4,5 <2% 1.5' . Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" 0 : 6" 0 1 9" : 70 1 12" ; 40 1 15" i 200 1 18" E >320 1 21" . 1 24" . Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils I ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ® Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ® Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions)1/4 ❑ Notes: I ›- Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SE @ 5% Hole depth: 1;0' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .15' Io -i ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems_<.5'ft re ®Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves } ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials El Other ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ❑Present (E1 Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes El No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? El Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicatorls)in representative plot 0 Present ❑Not Present IJURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest-I Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises I Date: 11/7/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28,29, 24N, 01E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I! Time: 14:20- 16:20 Plot#:q PlotDiameter: 20' [_I Wetland "II NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: ___ Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Identified Plant Species W%) Status (—%) Status Alnus rubra T 25 FAC [Tolmiea menziesii H 35 FAC Thuja plicate T 20 FAC Ca-__.. arex x dee w yanna FACU Ill Pseudotsuga menziesii, T 15 FACU+ Mahonia nervosa H 20 FACU(UPL) I G) ! Rubus H 20 FACU spectabilis S 45 FAC+ Rubus ursinus vitifolius p D Acer macrophyllum S 40 FACU I7 Rubus procerus S 35 FACU za Rhamnus purshiana S 20 FAC- Rubus laciniatus S 20 j FACU+ ', 1 Sambucus racemosa S 20 FACU • I 1 Polystichum munitum H 45 1 FACU Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 50.0% 1 I I I I I I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of l IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present ®Not Present ROUTINE ONaSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM I Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.08.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:10:25-11:10 Plot#: 5 Plot Diameter: 30' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status IZO See following page I— I— I W W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox 1 Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .2' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,seeds,roots I N A: .4' 0.17' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown,silty loam,fine roots,damp None B: 1.6' 0.5' 10YR,4,4 Dark yellowish brown silty sandy loam with fine gravel,moist None 0.83' 10YR,4,4 Dark yellowish brown silty sandy loam with fine gravel,moist None I 1.0' 10YR,4,4 Dark yellowish brown silty sandy loam with fine gravel'/.-3" None 1.5' None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): i1 3" _ 100 1 6" 250 J 9" >320 I 12" _ 1 15" 118" 1 21" _ 1 24" Primary Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils I ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I Ground surface inundated? EI Yes E No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SW @ 3-5% Hole depth: 1.6' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: 1.0' Depth to free water: 1.15' I O —I ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft O ce ® Saturated s 12"(rain) ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves I 0 ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ❑ Surface scouring ®Drift lines(to the SW) ❑Wetland drainage patterns Notes: IHYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? fg Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicatorls)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? El Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I 1; ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes\-I , Address Bremerton 1 Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 11/8/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, O 1 E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 10:25- 11:10 Plot#:C PlotDiameter: 30' C.=1 Wetland [! NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No _______ _______________ __.. Weather and Notes: _.___ ____ i' r Stratum I Indicator Stratum Indicator 1 Identified Plant Species Identified Plant Species (-°/0) 1 Status (-o 1/o) Status Alnus rubra T 100 FAC Thuja plicata S 45 FAC 1 mT1 Rubus spectabilis S 40 FAC+ m I Rubus ursinus vitifolius S 20 j FACU m . D ! Corylus corn uta S 15 FACU I -4 ! Blechnum spicant H 25 FAC+ ZI Tolmiea menziesii H 25 FAC Athynum filix-femina H 15 FAC V ' ! ! Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% 1 I i I I I i I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 o. I ROUTINE:..ON-SIT I ETLANP,D,ETERMR ATION FIELD OATA�FOR I Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.08.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29,T24N, RO1 E I Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:11:10-12:15 Plot#: 6 Plot Diameter: 20' El Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Drainage swale I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status ZZ See following page I H W 1ILJ Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .18' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,moss,roots,cones,seeds go A: .65' 0.17' 10YR,3, 2 Very dark grey brown silty loam,roots,damp None (I) B: 1.7'+ 0.5' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown silty loam with fine gravel,'/:",roots,damp None 0.83' 1.0' 10YR,4,3 Brown clayey silty with fine gravel,'/4-3/4",damp Faint <2% 1.5' Faint <2% Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 1 3" ; 40 1 6" i 120 1 9" i 80 1 12" : 40 1 15" : 75 1 18" 55 1 21" i 160 1 24" : 140 111 Primary Series Dystric Xerorthents (10) Taxonomy Dystric Xerorthents Drainage Class Moderately well Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) I ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >. Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SE @ 10% Hole depth: 1.7' O Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ® No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None r ° J ❑ Inundated O ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft • [' Saturated<_12" ['Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves } ❑Soil survey data ❑ FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ ID Matting/Films El Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ['Aerials ❑Other Waterway lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ❑Yes IKLNo Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophytic vegetation in representative plot ❑Present. ot Present 111 HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ►5 ot Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation IP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD`DATA FORM • Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest—I Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 11/8/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, 01E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp j Time: 11:10- 12:15 Plot#:6 , PlotDiameter: 12.Cr I _1 Wetland NI NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: ___ _____ I �_ -- - Stratum Indicator Stratum Statusr P 1 H 15 I FAC Identified Plant SpeciesIdentified Plant Species (—°/0) (_% j Status 'I Acer macrophyllum T 40 FACU Equisetum a e s 1 Tsuga heterophylla T 30 FACU- [ ACU- Ii M Alnus rubra T 25 FAC m Thuja plicata T 20 FAC D Oplopanax horridus S 45 FAC+ IO Thuja plicatS 35 FACa Z , Rubus spectabilis S 20 FAC+ 1iPolystichum munitum H 80 FACU Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 20 FACW Tolmiea menziesii H 20 FAC Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 50.0% I I I I 1 I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ' ROUTINE;ON-S#TEWOO DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 12:05-12:55 Date: 11.08.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Plot#: 7 Plot Diameter: 15' ® Wetland E ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?I El Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: 2'from stream edge I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page I— <H W W 111 Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma I J 0: .2' Duff layer:leaves,twigs,roots,seeds,cones ii-..il O A: .2' 0.17' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey mucky silt,saturated None cn B: 1.2' 0.5' 2.5Y,3,2 Very dark grey brown silty clay,saturated None 0.83' None 1.0' 10YR,4, 1 Darkgrey lean clay,very wet to saturated 7.5YR,4,3 7% 1.5' 7.5YR,4,3 7% I Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" 20 1 6" 30 1 9" i 30 1 12" i 90 1 15" i 80 1 18" i 75 1 21" c 95 1 24" , 125 IPrimary Series Dystric Xerorthents(10) Taxonomy Dystric Xerorthents Drainage Class Moderately well Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor .2'-.6'strong ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? EIYes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SE A 5-7% Hole depth: 1.3' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: .4' Depth to free water: .6' I O J El Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft El Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems .3'ft i ®Saturated<_12" ®Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves I 13 ❑ Soil survey data IDFAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations El Morphological adaptations _ ❑Matting/Films CI Waterway gauge ®Aerials 2003 El Other ®Surface scouring(stream)®Drift lines(to the SE) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation • P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes -( Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 11/8/2005 Legal: „21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 12:05- 12:55 Plot#:1 PlotDiameter: 15' iVl Wetland e._1 NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No sIs the area a potential problem area? No ~� Weather and Notes: _._ Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (—%) Status StratumT ) 1 Status Indicator Identified Plant Species /° Acer macrophyllum 70 Lactuca muralis H 20 None Thuja plicata T 25 FAC Carex deweyanna H 15 FACU I 6") Alnus rubra T 20 FAC m Oplopanax horridus S 60 FAC+ D Thuja plicata S 50 FAC III - Rubus s ectabilis S 25 FAC+ ZPol stichum munitum ! y H 30 FACU ITolmiea menziesii H 25 FAC f Blechnum spicant H 20 FAC+ 1 {Equisetum arvense H 20 FAC Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 66.7% I I I I I a 1 II I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.08.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, RO1 E I Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 12:55-1:35 Plot#: 8 Plot Diameter: 30' ® Wetland G ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ll Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page I H W iiIII 0W Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW,FAC',and/or FAC: I Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) IFeet BGS Hue Value Chroma - Hue Value Chroma J 0: .15' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,needles,cones,seeds,roots O A: .25' 0.17' 7.5YR,2.5, 1 Black muck,saturated None COI B: .6' 0.5' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown silty fine sand w/fine gravel,saturated None C: 1.4'+ 0.83' 10YR,2, 1 Black sandy silt with fine gravel,'W,saturated None 1.0' 10YR, 2, 1 Black sandy silt with fine gravel, '/4",saturated None I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , <10 1 6" , <10 1 9" , <10 1 12" i 40 1 15" ; 60 1 18" , 160 1 21" , >320 _I 24" IPrimary Series Dystric Xerorthents(10) Taxonomy Dystric Xerorthents Drainage Class Moderately well Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly III ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix I=1Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor .2' .5'moderate ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions El ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: VGround surface inundated? ®Yes ❑No Surface water depth: .15'center Slope(down): SE (a?2-4% Hole depth: 1.4' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .85'rising I O —I ® Inundated .15'ft center ®Water marks .2'ft ❑Water borne sediments ® Shallow root systems_<.5'ft • ®Saturated<_12" ®Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves a El Soil survey data ElFAC-Neutraltest ❑Algae encrustations El Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films El Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ®Other ponding.15'ft ❑Surface scouring ® Drift lines(to the E) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophytic vegetation in representative plot ®Present LI Not Present IHYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicatorls)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicatorls)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation IP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesi-t Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 11/8/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, O IE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp ' Time: 12:55- 13:35 Plot#:S PlotDiameter: 30' f'! Wetland&. I NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Identified Plant Species stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator p (—%) Status (—%) Status Alnus rubra T 70 FAC Tiarella trifoliata var trifoliata H 25 ' FAC- Thuja plicate T 60 FAC ! Blechnum spicant H 20 FAC+ mTsuga heterophylla T 35 FACU- rn L Oplopanax horridus S 45 FAC+ Ribes lacustre S 20 FAC+ o- C+ FA Z Ilex aquifolium S 15 Rubus s ectabilis S 20 FACU Rubus ursinus vitifolius S 15 FACU IDryopteris expansa assimilis H 40 FACW I ! Tolmiea menziesii H 30 FAC Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 75.0% 1 I I I I V I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.08.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:1:35-3:05 Plot#: 9 Plot Diameter: 30' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: II Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page I H W W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .15' Duff layer: leaves,twig,stems,moss,roots,seeds O A: .65' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black decaying plant material,charcoal,damp None I (1) B: 1.4'+ 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black decaying plant material,charcoal,damp None 0.83' 7.5YR,4,3 Brown silty fine sand,moist Faint <2% 1.0' 10YR,4,4 Dark yellowish brown fine sand with fine gravel, 1/8",damp Faint <2% I 1.5' None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" 40 1 6" 75 1 9" , 90 1 12" , >320 1 15" 1 18" , 1 21" , 1 24" , _ IPrimary Series Alderwood (2) Taxonomy Dystric Entic Durochrepts Drainage Class Moderately well Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix Due to charcoal ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List III ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): NNE na.4-5% Hole depth: 1.4' O Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ®No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None I O -1 ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments CI Shallow root systems ft O ❑Saturated s 12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves C3 ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations i _ ❑ Ma!`ing/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ❑ Surface scouring ❑ Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ❑Yes kNo Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophvtic vegetation in representative plot 0 Present 12kNot Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITER'ON MET? ❑Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? 0 Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present 111 EnCo Environmental Corporation IIP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes'"i Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises j Date: 11/8/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 13:35- 15:05 Plot#:9 PlotDiameter: 30' C 1 Wetland 1'J NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No 1 Is the area a potential problem area? No _ � Weather and Notes: Stratumindicator Stratum IndicatorStatus Identified Plant Species (—%) Identified Plant Species a I ) a Alnus rubra T 100 FAC Tolmiea menziesu H 20 FAC +- - Carex obnupta H 10 OBL I Salix hookeriana T 15 FACW- Pseudotsuga menz�esii S 60 FAC Rumex occidentalis H 10 FACW+ 9 f71 Rubus spectabilis iTl S 20 FACU+ D Rubus laciniatus S 20 FACU+ 0 FACU I p Z ! Sambucus racemosa S 20 FACU Thuja plicata S 20 FAC I 1 Carex deweyanna H 40 FACU 'Polystichum munitum H 25 FACU Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 40.0% 1 I I I I I I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE"WETLAND DETERNIII ATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:3:05-4:15 Date: 11.08.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29,T24N, R01 E Plot#: 10 Plot Diameter: 30' ® Wetland Q ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page I I- W W IIPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .2' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,seeds,roots,ferns O A: .8' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black clayey silt loam,few roots 1/8",loose,damp None I N B: 1.5' 0.5' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey clayey silt loam,damp None 0.83' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown silty clay,moist None 1.0' 2.5Y,4,4 Olive brown silty loam with fine sand,moist 7.5YR,4,6 7% I 1.5' 7.5YR,4,6 10% Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" i 30 1 6" i 40 1 9" i 110 1 12" : 170 1 15" i 215 1 18" i 175 1 21" i 180 1 24" : 100 IPrimary Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix 1:1❑ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ O• rganic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ L• isted on Local or National Hydric Soils List 111 ® Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >. Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): NE aqa 1-3% Hole depth: 1.5' O Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ®No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None Io J ❑ Inundated re ft ❑Water marks ft ®Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft ❑Saturated s 12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves } CI Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test El Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations I _ ❑Matting/Films ®Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials 2003 ❑Other ® Drift lines(to the NE) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator/s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicatorls)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes1—i i Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 11/8/2005 Legal: , 21, 28, 29,24N, O 1 E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 15:05- 16:15 1 Plot#:10 PlotDiameter: 30' Iv: Wetlandgl ' NonWetland 1 Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIIs the area a potential problem area? No RWeather and Notes: Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Identified Plant Species ( %) Status (-%) j Status Alnus rubra T 75 FAC Lactuca muralis H 20 None IG Acer macrophyllum T 45 FACU I Tiarella trifoliata var trifoliata H 20 FAC- Ill : Rubus spectabilis S 55 FAC+ Equisetum arvense H 10 FAC T1n Oplopanax horridus S 25 FAC+ D Rhamnus purshiana S 20 FAC- 71-I I Poly stichum munitum H 45 FACU j Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 40 FACW 1 Tolmiea menziesii H 35 FAC I :Athyrium filix-femina H 20 FAC Carex deweyanna H 20 FACU Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 71.4% 1 I I I I I I I U I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON=SITE WETLAND DETEWNafilON FIELD DATA FORM- Project/Site: ORhi1Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLCI Date: 11.08.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:4:15 4:50 Plot#: 11 Plot Diameter: 25' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ® No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: I Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Identified Plant Species (-%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page H I- W - I W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC',andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .25 Duff layer: leaves,twigs,seeds,roots A: 0.17' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam very wet (rain) None MO 0.5' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown silty loam,damp None 0.83' 10YR,4,2 Dark grey brown silty clay,very wet None 1.0' 10YR,4,2 Dark grey brown silty clay,very wet None <2% 1.5' 2.5Y,4,3 Olive brown silty clay,moist 10YR,4,6 5% I Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 3" i 20 1 6" i 40 1 9" , 170 1 12" i 215 1 15" ; 310 _I 18" i >350 1 21" , 1 24" IPrimary Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: IGround surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SE 0,1.2% Hole depth: 1.6' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: 1.05' Depth to free water: 1.05' I O -1 ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft O ❑ ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves � ❑Saturated<_12" Adventitious roots CI ElSoil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials Other❑ ❑ Surface scouring ❑ Drift lines(to the ) ❑Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? 0 Yes Ix No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot 0 Present i Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicatorls)in representative plot 0 Present ►5 Not Present I WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? 0 Yes ®No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747• Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises I Date: 11/8/2005 Legal: „21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp 1 Time: 16:15- 16:50 j Plot#: 11 PlotDiameter: 25' I.7 Wetland [s/F NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes _ Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? NoI Is the area a potential problem area? No �`� �� Weather and Notes: Plot#11 IdentlBed Plant Species Stratumf Indicator Stratum 1 Indicator Identified Plant Species , p (—%) Status l (--%) Status Acer macro h llum o i P Y T 75 FACU Alnus rubraI — T 75 I FAC Thuja plicate T 20 FAC i' m . Rubus spectabilis S 80 FAC+ ID Oplopanax horridus S 25 FAC+ purshiana O S 25 FAC- - Rhamnus urshiana I Z;I Polystichum munitum H 90 FACU 1 Rubus ursinus vitifolius ! H 20I FACU i ! Tolmiea menziesii H 20 FAC Equisetum arvense , H 15 FAC Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 50.0% I I I 1 I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION HELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.10.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 10:00-11:30 Plot#: 12 Plot Diameter: 10' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: II Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator p Identified Plant Species (-%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page I N W Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma _.I 0: 1" Duff layer: leaves,twigs,stems,seeds 0 A: 0.17' 10YR,3,3 Dark brown sandy loam,fine roots,slightly damp None 0.5' 10YR, 3,4 Dark yellow brown silty sandy loam w/fine gravel,slightly damp None 0.83' None I 1.0' 10YR,4,4 Dark yellow brown silty sand loam with gravel'/4-3" None 1.5' None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I13" : 220 I 6" . 180 1 9" i >320 1 12" . 1 15" , 1 18" 1 21" . 1 24" Primary Series Alderwood (1) Taxonomy Dystric Entic Durochrepts Drainage Class Moderately well Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils I ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: ILl Ground surface inundated? Yes No Surface water 7-9% ❑ ® e depth: None Slope(down): SW Hole depth:_1.5' Io• Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ®No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None 0 ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft cz ❑ Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves I 0 ❑Soil survey data ❑ FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑ Other ®Surface scouring ®Drift lines(to the SW) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ❑Yes 51 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophvtic veqetation in representative plot ❑Present ix Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation IP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD•DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/10/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time:10:00- 11:30 Plot#: a PlotDiameter: 10' L 1 Wetland ( l NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot 12 II Species Stratum Indicator Status{ Identified Plant Species I rat I Identified Plant Stratum Indicator Status; ) Cytisus scopanus S 70 None(UPL) IPseudotsuga menziesii S 50 FACU+ M Rubus procerus S 35 FACU m Salix hookeriana S 35 FACW- -I i Gaultheria shallop S 20 FACU 0 Holodiscus discolor S 20 None(UPL) Z Rubus parviflourus S 20 FAC- T Rubus spectabilisI S 20 FAC+ I Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa S 10 FAC jRubus ursinus vitifolius H 25 1 FACU 1 Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 25.0% I I I I I I I I I I Saturday,March I1,2006 Page 1 of 1 111 ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.10.05 Legal: Sec 21 & 28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 11:30-1:00 Plot#: 13 Plot Diameter: 10' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland_ Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator p (-%) Status Identified Plant Species " (-/o) Status ZZ See following page I H W I W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma ..j 0:.02' Duff layer:leaves,grass,seeds, 50%bare I 0O A: .1' 0.17' 10YR,4,4 Dark yellowish brown sandy gravel 1/2",moist None 0.5' 10YR,5,4 Yellowish brown sandy gravel%" 1W,moist None 0.83' 10YR,5,4 Yellowish brown sandy gravel%4-1'/2,moist None 1.0' 2.5Y,4,3 Olive brown sandy gravel 1"-3",moist None I 1.5' None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 3" i 230 I 6" , 300 1 9" , >320 I 12" , 1 15" i 1 18" i 1 21" i 1 24" II Primary Series Alderwood (1) Taxonomy Dystric Entic Durochrepts Drainage Class Moderatelywell Included Series Taxonomyg ❑ Histosol Drainage Class I ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils EI Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SW(G)1% Hole de th:1.4' Soil saturated in hole? p ❑Yes ®No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None Io --I ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments O ❑Shallow root systems ft re ❑ Saturated<_ 12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves } ❑Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ ❑Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ❑Surface scouring ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ISIYes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot I$Present 0 Not Present IHYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRFTERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation IP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest Address Bremerton 1 Site Owner: Triway Enterprises I Date: 1/10/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28,29, 24N, 01E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time:11:30- 13:00 1 Plot#: 13 PlotDiameter: 10' f i Wetland II NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes Is the area a potential problem area?I No • Weather and Notes: Plot#13 Identified Plant Species Stratum 'Indicator Status I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Status ( ) Salix hookeriana S 40 FACW- 1 Dactylis glomerata H 15 1 FACU 1 IPopulus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa S 20 FAC Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 15 FACU i A Cytisus scoparius S 10 None(UPL) m Plantago lanceolata H 40 FAC - ;Agrostis capillaris tenuis H 35 FAC O ,Agrostis exarata sp minor H 20 FACW ! Z 1 Juncus bufonius H 20 I FACW ++j Juncus tenuis H 20 FACW- 1 i Plantago major H 20 FACU+ 1 1 Agropyron repens H 15 I FAC- Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 87.5% I I I I I I 1 I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.10.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:1:00-1:45 Plot#: 14 Plot Diameter: 15' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status OSee following page 1 Ia- W W IIPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: 1" Duff layer: leaves,twigs,seeds I V) A: .35' 0.17' 10YR, 3, 1 Very dark grey silty sandy loam,roots,damp None 0.5' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown silty loam,charcoal,damp None 0.83' None 1.0' 10YR,4,3 Brown silty clay loam,damp Faint <2% I 1.5' 2.5Y,5,3 Light olive brown sandy silty loam with clay,damp 7.5YR,4,4 20% Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , 40 1 6" , 45 1 9" , 95 1 12" , 200 1 15" , >320 1 18" , 1 21" , 1 24" IPrimary Series Alderwood (1) Taxonomy Dystric Entic Durochrepts Drainage Class Moderately well Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Hi ❑ Histic Epipedon gh Organic Content in Surface Soils Layer in Sandy ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions 1.5'+ ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ® Notes: Hard pan at 1.5' 1Ground} surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SW a 5% Hole depth: 1.5' 0 Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ®No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None Io O ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft re ❑Saturated_< 12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves CI ❑ Soil survey data ❑ FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ❑Surface scouring ® Drift lines(to the SW) ❑Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? jtYes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot igt Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicators)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicatorls)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation IP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises i Date: 1/10/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE i Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time:13:00- 13:45 1 Plot#: 111 PlotDiameter: 15' [-1 Wetland rvi NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes I Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#14 Identified11 Stratum Plant Species � ( atom l Indicator Status Identified Plant Species ! Stratum Indicator Statusl Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa S 70 FAC p p p < Salix hookeriana S 50 FACW- - I MCytisus scoparius S 20 None(UPL) m ! Betula populifera S 15 None >I Holcus lanatus H 80 FAC 0 Z i i Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% I I I I 1 I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of I I ROUTINE OM=SITEWfTLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FARM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.10.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, RO1 E I Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 1:45-3:05 Plot#: 15 Plot Diameter: 15' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Z Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Just north of wetland#P II Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator V%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page i H H W W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) IFeet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .08' Duff layer: leaves,grass,seeds,twigs O A: .25' 0.17' 10YR, 2, 1 Black mucky silty loam,fine roots,very moist None I N B: 1.2' 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black mucky silty loam,very moist None 0.83' 10YR,2, 1 Black silty loam,moist None 1.0' 10YR,2,2 Very dark brown silty clay loam,moist None I 1.5' None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 1 3" i 40 1 6" i 50 1 9" i 60 1 12" : 50 1 15" i 100 1 18" : 100 1 21" i 85 1 24" : >32O_ aPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix ® Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >. Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): S 4% Hole depth: 1.5' O Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ®No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None I O J ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft El Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems_<.5' ft O le ❑Saturated<_12" El Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves } ❑Soil survey data El FAC-Neutral test El Algae encrustations El Morphological adaptations l _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ®Surface scouring(stream)® Drift lines(to the S) ❑Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? (El Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicators)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicators)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? 0 Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747• Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes+- ( Address Bremerton 1 Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/10/2005 Legal: „21, 28,29,24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 13:45- 15:05 Plot#: 15 PlotDiameter: 15' L Wetland kel NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes Is the area a potential problem area?I No Weather and Notes: Plot#15 • Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (—%) Status (—%) i Status Alnus rubra T 95 1 FAC Thuja plicate T 20 FAC ; Rubus spectabilis S 80 FAC+ mm Oenanthe sarmentosa H 50 OBL Glyceria elata-strata H 30 1 FACW+ I1' 5 Carex deweyanna H 25 FACU zEquisetum arvense H 20 FAC II Stachys cooleyae var chamissonis H 20 FACW Tolmiea menziesii H 15 I FAC Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% 1 I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE Ohl SITE:WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist:Jonathan Kemp Time:3:05-4:50 Date: 11.10.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29,T24N, R01E Plot#: 16 Plot Diameter: 15' ® Wetland I ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No 1 Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ® No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ® No Weather&Notes: I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page 1 I-- U1 1 0 W 1 Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW',FACW,FACW,FAC',andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0:.15' Duff layer:leaves,twigs I 0A:.25' 0.17' 10YR,3,2 Very dark brown silty sandy loam,saturated None B: 1.0' 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 or 2 Black mucky silty sandy gravel, '/4",loam,saturated None C: 1.4' 0.83' 10YR,2, 1 Black mucky sandy silt w/fine gravel,saturated 7.5YR,4,6 7% I >1.5' 1.0' 10YR,2, 1 Black silty clay loam,moist None 1.5' 2.5Y,5,2 Greyish brown silty clay,moist 10YR,5,6 15% Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 1 I 3" 1 30 I 6" i 140 1 9" i 140 1 12" ; 150 I 15" i 200 1 18" i 280 1 21" ; 290 1 24" >320 Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix ® Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils I ® Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ® Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: 1 Ground surface inundated? ['Yes Z No Surface water ) down Slope None depth: ( : SSW an.2-3% Hole depth: 1.5' P O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .25' I O J ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <.5'ft ®re Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves I ❑Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Waterway gauge ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations _ ❑Matting/Films ®Aerials ❑Other ❑Surface scouring ® Drift lines(to the SSW) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hvdroloav indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present El Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesf-) Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/10/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp , Time: 15:05- 16:50 I Plot#: 1 PlotDiameter: 15' lvl Wetland r NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#16 II _- - i Stratum l Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species (--% � Status I (-%) I Status I Alnus rubra I T 95 FAC I Thuja plicataT 25 FAC IIll 1 Carex obnupta $70 OBL rnRubus spectabilis S 60 FAC+ II > I Alnus rubra S 25 FAC --I Glyceria elata-striata H 35 FACW+ z , Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 25 FACU IStachys cooleyae var chamissonis H 20 I j FAC_ — 1 [ Tolmiea menziesii H 20 FAC Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 83.3% I I I I I I I I I 1 Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON- # `�WElL!ND UE7ERMINAT>ON,f1EED DATA FORM; .. ''. Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.10.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, RO1 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:4:00-4:50 Plot#: 17 Plot Diameter: 20' ® Wetland L El Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? LI Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: II Identified Plant Species _ Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status O See following page I F W 0 W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma _J 0: .12' , Duff layer: leaves,twigs,seeds,branches O A: .15' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,saturated None I N B: 1.4' 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,saturated None C: 1.4+ 0.83' None 1.0' 10YR,2, 1 Black mucky sandy silt w/fine gravel 1/1" None I 1.5' _ 10YR,4, 1 Dark grey fine sand wlfine gravel,saturated None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 3" , 40 1 6" , 75 1 9" , 50 1 12" 20 1 15" , 15 1 18" , 60 1 21" , 70 1 24" , 145 111 Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Shalcar Muck (50) Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix I ® Histic Epipedon El High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Moderate.2'-.6' ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >. Ground surface inundated? ®Yes CINo Surface water depth:Appx. 1'at center Slope(down): SW a..2-3% Hole depth: 1.5' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes CINo Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .15' I 0 J ® Inundated ft ®Water marks .5'ft LI Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems ft O fx ® Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves } ❑Soil survey data CI FAC-Neutral test EI Algae encrustations LI Morphological adaptations ' CI_ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials ®Other Ponding ®Surface scouring LI Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? IM Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com 1 I ROUTINE ON—SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest Address Bremerton 1 Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/10/2005 Legal: „21, 28, 29,24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp i Time: 16:00- 16:50 Plot#: 6'7 PlotDiameter: 20' INeI WetlandLL J NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area?I No Weather and Notes: Plot#17 IIII Indicator Status tratu dicator St NI 1Identified Plant Species Stratum Identified Plant Species s " t" at"� j (—°ro_ Salix lucida var.lasiandra t T 90 FACW+ ,< i Salix hookeriana T 25 FACW- n1r Thuja plicata T 20 FAC rnSpiraea douglasii S 35 FACW —1 S 20 - FAC- , D Rubus spectabilis S 25 FAC+ = Rubus parviflourus ZJuncus effusus H 20 FACW Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 20 FACU 111 Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 66.7% 1 I I I I I . I I I I 1 Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 oft I ROUTINE ON41 " TLAND tiETERMINATMN FIELD DATA FORS! Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.14.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:10:00-10:45 Plot#: 18 Plot Diameter: 15' ® Wetland N ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Depressional at far NW corner of site I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page I 1- W W I Percent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .08' _ Duff layer: leaves,twigs,seeds,needles O A: 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,saturated None I U) 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,saturated None 0.83' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,saturated None 1.0' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty clay loam,saturated None I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" i <10 I 6" 1 <10 1 9" i 15 1 12" i 70 1 15" i 120 1 18" i 270 I 21" : 180 1 24" : 205 IPrimary Series Alderwood (3) Taxonomy Dystric Entic Durochrepts Drainage Class Moderately well Included Series Shalcar Muck(50)Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix .85(edge) ® Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Slight to moderate ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: IGround surface inundated? ®Yes ❑No Surface water depth: .5'—2' Slope(down): E a 1% Hole depth: 1.2' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .2' Io -� ® Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft 1=1 Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <.5'ft O it ® Saturated<_12" ID Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves Ip ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑ Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials ®Other ponding>.5'ft El Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present l HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ❑Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/14/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time:10:00- 10:45 i Plot#: 18 PlotDiameter: 15' ' WetlandNl l NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#18 I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Status o) Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator StatuFA Alnus rubra T 70 FAC ;Polystichum munitum : H 15 CU C Spiraea douglasii S 85 FACW M Rubus spectabilis S 25 FAC+ C) { Thuja plicate S 25 FAC --I D Oenanthe sarmentosa H 75 OBL I O Ranunculus repens H 50 FACW z Tolmiea menziesii H 25 FAC Veronica serpyllifolia j H 25 FAC ICarex obnupta i H 20 OBL Equisetum arvense H 20 FAC Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% I I 1 I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 ROUTINE DN-SITE WETLAND-DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.14.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 10:45 1:15 Plot#: 19 Plot Diameter: 25' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Depressional I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status ZO See following page I17-- H W i (.7W Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW',FACW,FACW-,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (°/a) IFeet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .14' Duff layer: grass,leaves,seeds,stems O A: .25' 0.17' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam,saturated None ' N B: 1.0' 0.5' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown sand,silt loam,very moist None 0.83' 10YR,4, 1 Dark grey sandy silty loam,saturated 7.5YR,5,6 <2% 1.0' 2.5Y,5,2 Greyish brown silty clay loam,very damp 7.5YR, 5,6 10% I 1.5' Hard pan layer 7.5YR,5,6 15% Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 3" 20 1 6" i 60 1 9" i 180 1 12" : 300 1 15" i 180 1 18" : 220 1 21" i 280 1 24" i >320 IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions>_1.0' ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): S ft,4-7% Hole depth: 1.5' 0 Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: .1'(rain) Depth to free water: .45' Io J ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft O re ® Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots El Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves } ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ El Matting/Films El Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ❑Yes E No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot 0 Present E Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes E No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present E Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? E Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot E Present ❑Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? 0 Yes E No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present E Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest � Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises I Date: 1/14/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time:10:45- 13:15 , Plot#: 19 PlotDiameter: 25' C i Wetland [ I NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No I Weather and Notes: Plot#19 L Stratum Indicator Status Stratum Indicator Status) II I Identified Plant Species a Identified Plant Species ( "i�) io Alnus rubra T 75 FAC Juncus effusus H 25 FACW ' Acer macrophyllum T 20 FACU I Cirsium arvense H 20 FACU+ M Rubus spectabilis S 35 FAC+ [Hypochaeris radicata H 20 FACU G") m Rubus procerus S 30 1 FACU —I D Corylus corn uta I S 20 FACU i - -_P H 60 FACW Ranunculus re ens ZAgrostis exarata sp minor H 40 C FACW ii, Carex deweyanna H 40 FACU Agrostis capillaris tenuis H 30 FAC 1 Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 30 FACU 1 Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 50.0% ' I I I I I I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD:DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 1:15-1:45 Date: 11.14.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Plot#: 20 Plot Diameter: 15' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status OSee following page 17.- < W - 1 W Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC',and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .18' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,branches,ferns,seeds O A: 0.17' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown sandy silty loam,fine roots,damp None I CA 0.5' 10YR,3,3 Dark brown sandy silty loam,very damp 7.5YR,4,6 2% 0.83' 10YR,3,4 Dark yellowish brown sandy loam,very damp 5YR,3,4 5% 1.0' 10YR,3,4 Dark yellow brown sandy loam with fine gravel,very moist 5YR, 3,4 7% I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , 20 1 6" 45 1 9" , 40 1 12" , 120 1 15" , 170 1 18" , >320 1 21" , 1 24" Primary Series Kllchis- h ltn (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Ha lumbre is Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) El Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) El Notes: 1 y, Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): N @ 5-7% Hole depth: 1.5' 0 Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: 1.2' Depth to free water: 1.4' 0 J ❑ Inundatedit ft ❑Water marks ft El Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft ❑Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves CI ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations I _ EI Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ❑Surface scouring ®Drift lines(to the 5) ❑Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ❑Yesjst No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot 0 Present a Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicator/sl in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest Address Bremerton 1 Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/14/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time:13:15- 13:45 Plot#: 1O PlotDiameter: 15' I I Wetland Iv] NonWetland 1 Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No I Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#20 Stratum Indicator Status Identified Plant Species Stratum j Indicator Statug 1 Species (_°,o) Identified Plant Alnus rubra T 80 FAC Rubus spectabilis S 85 FAC+ l m Rubus procerus S 20 FACU U -I Vaccinium parvifofium S 20 FACU+C(UPL — I Polystichum munitum H 65 FACU IO Z Rubus ursinus vdifolius H 20 FACU Lactuca muralis H 15 None ,: I Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 50.0% I I I I 1 I I I I I Saturday,March 11,2006 Page 1 of l I ROUTINE ONSITEWETIAN©DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FARM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 1:45-2:50 Date: 11.14.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Plot#: 21 Plot Diameter: ® Wetland M ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status O See following page I H W I W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) IFeet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: Duff layer: O A: 0.17' 7.5YR,2.5, 1 Black mucky clayey silt,saturated None I N 0.5' 7.5YR,2.5, 1 Black clayey silty loam,compact,moist None 0.83' 5YR,2.5, 1 Black silty clay,compact,slightly damp 5YR,5, 1 30% 1.0' 10YR,2, 1 Black silty clay,compact,slightly damp 5YR,5, 1 40% I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 3" i 20 1 6" i 125 1 9" i 185 1 12" `• 270 1 15" i 215 1 18" 260 1 21" i 275 1 24" : 280 IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix I ® Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor .1'-.5'slight to moderate ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: 1 >_ ' Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): S 1-3% Hole depth:1.5' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: .60' Depth to free water: .70' 0 I J ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <.4'ft. O � ® Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑,Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves CI ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ ® Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials ❑Other ❑ Surface scouring ❑ Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation I P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes4}-1 Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises { Date: 1/14/2005 Legal: „21, 28,29,24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 13:45- 14:50 j Plot#:zl PlotDiameter: ' E4J WetlandM,❑ NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No ._ Is the area a potential problem area? No I Weather and Notes: Plot#21 _ I r Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species � Identified Plant Species StratumIndicator I ,- ( %) Status (...,%) Status Thuja plicata T 50 FAC 1 Athyrium filix-femina H 20 FAC I Alnus rubra T 40 FAC ! Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 20 FACU Idi Rubus spectabilis S 45 FAC+ I Epilobium ciliatum H 15 FACW- m Spiraea douglasii S 25 FACW 1 D I Lonicera involucrata S 20 FAC+ ' Carex obnupta H 35 OBL z D o p teris ansa assimilis H 35 FACW Z �Y P expansa Carex deweyanna H 25 FACU Glyceria elata-striata H 25 FACW+ Oenanthe sarmentosa H 25 OBL Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 90.0% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-S1EELAN3 ETERMATON FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.14.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 2:30-3:25 Plot#: 22 Plot Diameter: 15' ® Wetland K El Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? El Yes ® No Weather&Notes: Depressional slope at?? I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status O See following page I- W - W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma - J 0: .22' Duff layer: moss,dead plant material,leaves,twigs O A: .7' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black peaty muck,saturated None I N 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black peaty muck,saturated None 0.83' 2.5Y,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam with fine gravel,saturated None 1.0' 1.5' I Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , <10 I 6" 1 <10 1 9" i 20 1 12" i 55 1 15" ; 50 1 18" i 50 1 21" i 90 1 24" , 120 _ IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Shalcar Muck(50) Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon El High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Slight @.1' .5' ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) E l Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I }, Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑No Surface water depth: .4'-.5' Slope(down): S @ 2% Hole depth: 1.0' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes El No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: At surface Io —1 ® Inundated .5'ft ElWater marks ft ElWater borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft O re ®Saturated<_12" El Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves } ❑Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test El Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films El Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials El ® ® Other ponding.5 ft Drift lines(to the ) Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No I RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesf- I % Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises I Date: 1/14/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28,29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 14:30- 15:25 1 Plot#: 22 PlotDiameter: 15' 41 WetlandKE NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#22 -- to StatusiatIdentified Identified Plant Species I (-'°/0) ) IPlant Species 'I stratum � Indicator Stratum Indicator ° (-%) j Status Thuja plicata T 85 FAC Polypodium glycyrrhiza H 10 FACU(UPL) Spiraea douglasii S 40 FACW < m Rubus spectabilis S 25 FAC+ m ! Rubus ursinus vitifolius S 20 FACU --I Sambucus racemosa S 20 FACU i 0 Carex obnupta H 90 OBL ZAthyrium filix-femina ! H 20 FAC Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 20 FACW I { Oenanthesarmentosa H 0 OBLC 1 Tiarella trifoliata var trifoliata 20 FAC- Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% iii 1 I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I _ ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM; Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I _Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.14.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 3:25-4:30 Plot#: 23 Plot Diameter: 20' ® Wetland K ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Depressional slope I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status Z See following page I IN W 1 W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0:.15' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,seeds O A: .5' 0.17' 10YR, 2, 1 Black mucky silty sandy loam,saturated None I N B: .8' 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black mucky sandy silty loam,saturated None C: .8'+ 0.83' 2.5Y,3,2 Very dark grey brown mucky silty sandy loam,saturated 10YR, 5,6 10% 1.0' 2.5Y,4, 3 Olive brown sandy fine gravel,saturated 10YR,5,6 7% I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , 15 1 6" , 15 1 9" i 35 1 12" , 140 1 13" >320 1 18" , 1 21" , 1 24" Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic HaplumbreptsI Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosoi ® Depleted Matrix ® Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Slight ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑No Surface water depth:.5'in center Slope(down): S 2 3% Hole depth: 1.0' • Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes 111 No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .10' 0 „--I ® Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft El Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <.4'ft CL ® Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves CICISoil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ElMorphological adaptations _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials ®Other pondinq.5'ft center ❑ Surface scouring ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? CO Yes 0 No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes t--I Address Bremerton ' Site Owner: Triway Enterprises I Date: 1/14/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28,29, 24N, O 1 E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 15:25- 16:30 Plot#:23 PlotDiameter: 20' 1,/_] WetlandK❑ NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes ^_ Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No I Weather and Notes: Plot#23 t Status c Identified Plant Species Identified Plant Species Stratumo IndicatorStatus Stratum Indicator T 50 FAC 1 Alnus rubra T 45 FAC La Carex arcta H 20 muralis — OBL Thuja plicata — ! c muralis 20 None fll Rubus spectabilis• _. S 40 FAC+ Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 20 FACU m ; Corylus cornuta S 10 1 FACU Stachys cooleyae var chamissonis H 20 FACW 1 D 1 Carex obnupta H 75 OBL Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 45 FACW z Tolmiea menziesii ( H 40 FAC PoaPrapratensis H30 FAC Glyceria elata-striata I-125 FACW+ II Oenanthe sarmentosa H 25 OBL iPercent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE N-SITEi LAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 11:30-12:00 Date: 11.15.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Plot#: 24 Plot Diameter: 10' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Swale east of wetland#L 11 Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page I t- W W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW',FACW,FACW-,FAC',and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .25' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,stems,seeds,moss p A: .28' 0.17' 10YR, 3,3 Dark brown silty sandy fine gravel, 1/8",roots,moist None I N B: 1.4' 0.5' 10YR,4,4 Dark yellow brown silty sand with fine gravel, 1/8",moist 7.5YR,4,6 10% 0.83' 1.0' 2.5Y,5,4 Light olive brown fine sand,moist 7.5YR,4,6 5% I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 2" i 280 I 3" >320 I 9" , 112" , I 15" , I 18" , 121" , I 24" IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I [I Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix [I Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions 11:1 ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: II >. Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): S @ 7% Hole depth: 1.4' O Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ® No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None I O ❑ 0 Inundated ft LI Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments El Shallow root systems ft re ❑Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ['Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves CI ❑ Soil survey data illFAC-Neutraltest ❑Algae encrustations 1:1Morphological adaptations _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ['Other I ❑Surface scouring ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? 0 Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? CO Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation IP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TnwayWesf- I Address Bremerton tSite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/15/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29,24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 11:30- 12:00 Plot#:2y PlotDiameter: 10' ❑ Wetland INonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#24 � Indicator I Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species �I ; Identified Plant Species ( � oStratumyot status J IL_ t—^io> I Status Alnus rubra T 100 FAC Thuja plicata T 20 FAC Ii Ill Rubus spectabilis S 90 FAC+ m Rubus procerus S 25 FACU 7> Acer—1 Rubus acro hyll m - 1 laci S 20 FACU i I S 20 1 FACU+ 1 0 Rubus parviflourus j S 20 FAC- T IRubus ursinus vitifolius , H 35 FACU 1 Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 66.7% 1 I I I I I IliIII I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON4ITEINETLMD,PETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.15.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 12:00-1:30 Plot#: 25 Plot Diameter: 15' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?I El Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Stream(non-wetland) I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page 1 H W W Percent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW,FAG',and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .04' Duff layer: leaves,ferns,seeds,moss,roots NA: .4' 0.17' 7.5YR, 3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam w/fine gravel 1/8",roots,moist None B: 1.2' 0.5' 2.5Y,4,4 Olive brown silty sandy loam w/fine gravel 1/2",very moist 7.5YR,4,6 7% 0.83' 2.5Y,4,3 Olive brown silty sandy loam w/fine gravel 1/4",very moist 7.5YR,4,6 15% Olive brown siltyloam w/fine gravel 1.0' 2.5Y,4,4W,wet 7.5YR,4,6 15% I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" i 25 1 6" 75 1 9" 155 1 12" , >320 115" , 118" , 1 21" , 1 24" IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class 1 ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ® Redox Body Depletions .4'—1.4'+ ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) I ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I ›„ Ground surface inundated? ElYes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): @ 8-10%_Hole depth: 1_2' 0 Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: 1.1' Depth to free water: 1.15' 0 ❑ Inundated ft El Water marks ft El Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft I r‘--.1 ❑Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves C1ElSoil survey data El FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ElMorphological adaptations I _ ElMatting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ®Surface scouring(stream)®Drift lines(to the E) ❑Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? 0 Yes 6r No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ❑Present StNot Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicatorls)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: j J ect VII h Address a re,-, t On ISite Owner: - 1c;wo,. Date: 11. lS•05- Legal: SPC 2)1 2 / 29 T 2.`J N Rqf Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 12:00- 13:30 Plot#:2P1otDiameter: 15' ❑ Wetland fel NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#25 Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species � Stratym �I Indicator �i Identified Plant Species I (-%) FACU 1 (-%) Status P Acer macrophyllum T 55 Alnus rubra T 15 FAC 1 AI A Rubus spectabilis S 80 I FAC+ m Rubus parviflourus S 40 FAC- Sambucus racemosa S 30 FACU _ Rhamnus purshiana I S 25 FAC- I, O Z Polystichum munitum ! H 50 FACU Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 20 FACU Tolmiea menziesii H 20 FAC I Galium triflorum H 10 FACU L Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 40.0% 1 I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE QN SJTE WETLANDPETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.15.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29,T24N, R01 E I Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:1:30-2:00 Plot#: 26 Plot Diameter: 25' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?111 ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes:Stream(non-wetland) I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status ZO See following page I H W W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW{,FACW,FACW,FAC',andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) IFeet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .15' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,stems, moss,roots I 0 A: 0.17' 7.5YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam,roots,very damp None Cl) 0.5' 7.5YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam,very damp None 0.83' 7.5YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam,very damp None 1.05' 2.5Y,4,4 Olive brown sandy loam,very damp 7.5YR,4,6 10% 1.2' 7.5YR,4,6 22% Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , 30 I 6" , 90 1 9" , 80 1 12" , 230 1 13" , >320 118" 1 1 21" , 1 24" IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions >1' ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ['Yes ® No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): E a..5% Hole depth: 1.2' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: 1.15' Depth to free water: None Io J ❑ Inundated ft El Water marks ft El Water borne sediments El Shallow root systems ft O Et ❑Saturated<_12" Ill Adventitious roots CI Oxidized root channels<12" 1=1 Water stained leaves } El Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test El Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other El Surface scouring ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? laYes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophytic vegetation in representative plot IN Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present E)Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation iP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesj--( Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/15/2005 Legal: „21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE r-- Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 13:30- 14:00 Plot#:26 PlotDiameter: 25' I.1 Wetland Irl NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No _________ Weather and Notes: Plot#26 1 , Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species I Stratum I Indicator Status I , (—%) 1 Status 1 Thu a plicata T 35 FAC Alnus rubra T 30 FAC Rubus s ectabilis S 85 FAC+ m Acer macrophyllum S 25 FACU Rubus procerus I S 25 H 40 FACU FACU "I y Pol stichum mundum z Tolmiea menziesu H 40 FAC Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 20 FACU i Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 80.0% 1 I I 1 I II I I I 1 Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITEET I I P;ETERMINATION FIELD DATA;FORA Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:2:00-3:10 Date: 11.15.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Plot#: 27 Plot Diameter: 20' ® Wetland J ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: 11 Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page II— - H W 111 W Percent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC*,andlor FAC: 111 Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .12' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,needles,seeds,moss O A: .8' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,very wet None I Cl) B: 1.15' 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,very damp None C: 1.15'+ 0.83' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown silty clay loam,very damp None _ 1.0' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,very damp None • 1.2' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 13" i 20 I 6" i 30 1 9" i 85 1 12" i 50 1 15" ? 40 I 18" i 35 1 21" i 65 1 24" 65 IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Shalcar Muck (50) Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions >1.4' 10% El Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None • Slope(down): SSE(a 5% Hole depth: 1.5' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: 1.1' Depth to free water: 1.2' Io —I ❑ Inundated ce ft ['Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <4'ft ❑Saturated 12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves C3 ❑Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I >" ❑Matting/Films ElWaterway gauge ®Aerials Other _ ❑ Surface scouring ® Drift lines(to the S) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com IROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesf- I Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/15/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 14:00-15:10 Plot#:"27 P1otDiameter: 20' L WetlandSCl NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No — 11 Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#27 — -- to Status 1 i Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator ndi` r Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Specieso P Thuja plicata T 70 FAC ! Stachys cooleyae var chamissonis H 20 FACW Alnus rubra T 50 FAC m Rubus spectabilis S 75 FAC+ m Vaccinum ovatum S 20 None D Oplopanax horridus S 10 FAC+ 11 _-I " Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 40 FACW Z Tolmiea menziesii H 40 FAC i 1 Polystichum munitum H 25 FACU Carex arcta H 20 OBL Lactuca muralis( o per stratum,no H 20 None Percent of dominant(>20%,>2ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 83.3% 1 I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE-WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM ;. Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.15.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, RO1 E I Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:3:10-4:45 Plot#: 28 Plot Diameter: 30' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page W - 111 W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) IFeet BGS _ Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .15' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,stems,moss, roots,berries O A: .2' 0.17' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam with roots,moist None I N B: 1.5' 0.5' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam,moist None 0.83' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam,moist 7.5YR,4,6 <2% 1.0' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown silty loam,moist None 1.5' 10YR, 3,2 Very dark grey brown sandy loam w/fine gravel l/",v moist 7.5YR,4,6 <2% Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 13" , 60 1 6" i 70 I 9" i 80 1 12" i 90 1 15" , 115 1 18" i 75 1 21" 75 1 24" , 110 IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly ILl Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) I ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: IGround surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): SE(a.4% Hole depth: 1.5' O Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ®No Depth to saturated soil: 1.5' Depth to free water: None Io J ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft O ❑Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves } CI Soil survey data ❑ FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations CI Morphological adaptations I _ 1=1Matting/Films ❑Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other CI Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ❑Yes I$No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot 0 Present ®'Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? El Yes ®No iRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com i I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes-f- i Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/15/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 5:10- 16:45 Plot#:2-a PlotDiameter: 30' C i Wetland lV NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community?I Yes p �� Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No I Weather and Notes: Plot#28 Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator VA) Status (—°/°) Status 1 Alnus rubra T 60 FACDryopteris expansa assimilis H 10 FACW IIj <111 Salix Salix holuokearvar.iana T 40 FACW- I Glyceria elata-striata H 10 � FACW+ Rubus spectabilis S 60 fn FAC+ Juncus effusus H 8 OBL { dlasiandra T 40 FACW+ Carex obnupta H 8 FACW P S 45 FACU Tolmiea menziesii H 7 FAC procerus D Rubus I Corylus cornuta I S 20 FACU L ZCarex deweyanna H 25 FACU Polystichum munitum H 20 FACU Rubus ursinus vitifolius I H 20 { FACU Bromus vulgaris H 15 UPL Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 50.0% 1 I 1 I I I I I I I i I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE;ON-.SITE WETLAND DEtERM NATION FEEL: DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I _ Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.17.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 11:00-11:45 Plot#: 29 Plot Diameter: 20' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Gravel road west and timbered I Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope near knockout-south 11 Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page I— < H W W 111 Percent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW,FACW,FACW,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma .I 0: .12' _ Duff layer:grass,rush,leaves,twigs,seeds I 0 A: .25' 0.17' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown silty sandy fine gravel,roots,saturated None B: 1.1'+ 0.5' 10YR,3,3 Dark brown silty sandy fine gravel 1/2"-2",saturated None 0.83' 10YR,3,4 Dark yellow brown silty sandy fine gravel /2"-2",saturated None 1.0' 10YR,3,4 Dark yellow brown silty sandy fine gravel 1"-2",saturated None 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 3" . 220 1 6" : >320 I 9" . I 12" 115" I 18" . I21" I 24" . Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils I ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: IGround surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): NE @ 7% Hole depth: 1.1' 0 O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ElNo Depth to saturated soil: At surface(rain) Depth to free water: .3' I O J ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ElWater borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft O• ❑Saturated<-12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves } ❑ Soil survey data ElFAC-Neutraltest ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ El Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ❑Surface scouring ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: IHYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? tgi Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot I,$Present 0 Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? 0 Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes{- ( Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises i D� ate: 1/17/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, O IE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 11:00- 11:45 j Plot#:2q, PlotDiameter: 20' Li Wetland NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes Gravel road west and timbered IIIIs the area a potential problem area? No __ __ Weather and Notes: Plot#29 (—%) Indicator tus Identified Plant Species 1 Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator . Stratum Indicator � Status - (—%) I Acer macrophyllum T 40 FACU Holcus lanatus H 60 FAC Alnus rubra T 40 FAC i Juncus effusus H 60 FACW cm/lis S 45 enz�esii S 40 FAC+ ; Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 30 FACU I mPseudotsugaFACU+ Geum macrophyllum H 20 FACW- Cytisus scoparius j S 35 None(UPL) Hypericum perforatum H 20 None - Rubus procerus Hypochaeris radicata H 20 FACU z1 Salix hookeriana S 35 FACW- Buddleja davidii S 20 I None itHolodiscus discolor S 20 None(UPL) 1 Rubus parviflourus S 20 FAC- Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 62.5% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLANp DETERMINATK N FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.17.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:11:45 1:10 Plot#: 30 Plot Diameter: 1S' ® Wetland D ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Road and clearcut Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ® No Weather&Notes: Depression,slope I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page I I— <H W I " W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC',andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma .J 0: .18' Duff layer: grass,leaves,seeds O A: 0.17' I CO 0.5' 10YR, 2,2 Very dark brown sandy loam,saturated None 0.83' 10YR,2,2 Very dark brown mucky silt loam,saturated 5YR,4,4 <2% 1.0' 10YR,2, 1 Black mucky silt loam,very saturated,damp None 1.5' 10YR,2,2 Very dark brown silty sandy loam,very damp None I Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" i 60 1 6" , 100 1 9" , 140 1 12" , 180 1 15" i 180 1 17" i >320 1 21" , 1 24" II Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix .83' ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ® Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) 5YR,4,41/8" ❑ Notes: I >„ Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑ No Surface water depth: .4' Slope(down): S A 1-2% Hole depth: 1.5' D Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: .6' Depth to free water: .85' Io J ® Inundated .4'ftce CI Water marks ft Ii Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft ®Saturated<_12" El Adventitious roots CI Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves C1 ❑Soil survey data ❑ FAC-Neutral test I=1Algae encrustations CIMorphological adaptations _ Cl Matting/Films CIWaterway gauge CIAerials ElOther I ❑ Surface scouring ❑ Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicatorls)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ' ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesF— i Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/17/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 11:45- 13:10 Plot#: PlotDiameter: IS.' V, Wetland 01- 1 NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes Road and clearcut IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#30 % 1 Status - t .. 1 Identified Plant SpeciesII j Identified Plant Species I stratum Indicator ll � i 1 rubra P Stratum 35 � Indicator FAC Carex obnupta H 15 r StatusOBLI Alnus ub i Rubus spectabilis S 30 FAC+ I1 Salix hookeriana S 20 FACW- Tl I Agrostis capillaris tenuis H 40 1 FAC Ranunculus repens H 40 FACW IAgrosfis exarata sp minor H 30 FACW z ,Juncus effusus H 30 FACW I Elymus glaucus H 25 FACU Plantago major H 25 FACU+ 1 Rumex crispus H 20 FAC+ Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 • Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE,ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:1:00-1:45 Date: 11.17.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Plot#: 31 Plot Diameter: 15' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope area I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page I FI- W W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .15' Duff layer: grass,leaves,seeds,twigs,berries 0 A: .35' 0.17' 10YR, 2, 2 Very dark brown silt loam,rooty,moist None I (0 B: 1.15' 0.5' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silt loam,moist None C: 1.5'+ 0.83' 10YR,4,2 Dark grayish brown silt clay loam,moist None 1.0' 10YR,4,2 Dark grey brown silty sandy loam,very moist 7.5YR,4,6 <2% I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq. in.): I 3" ; 60 1 6" , 140 1 9" , 130 1 12" , 180 1 15" i 280 1 18" i >320 121" , 1 24" Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class ❑ Histosol Ell Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon 1:1 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils IE] Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic El Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): N @ 1-2% Hole depth: 1_5' � Yes No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None Soil saturated in hole? P t7 ❑ ® P Io --I ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft 01 Water borne sediments ['Shallow root systems ft O ❑Saturated<_ 12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves } ❑ Soil survey data ❑ FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations U _ ❑Matting/Films ❑Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge El Aerials ID Other r] Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? 0 Yes jgt No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ❑Present Efir Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑ Yes El No 111 RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑ Present El Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes--1 I Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises i Date: 1/17/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28,29, 24N, 01E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 13:00- 13:45 Plot#:31 PlotDiameter: 15' C] Wetland vl NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIs the area a potential problem area? No _ n Weather and Notes: Plot#31 —- Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator WY.) Status (-%) L Status Alnus rubra T 70 FAC Juncus effusus H 10 ; FACW Rubus spectabilis S 55 FAC+ I Rumex crispus H 10 FAC+ Salix hookeriana i M Rubus procerus S 35 FACU m i j S 20 FACW- Carex degweyanna ! H 30 FACU I Z j Holcus lanatus H 30 I FAC Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 25 FACU IBromus vulgaris C H 20 UPL Carex arcta H 15 OBL IPercent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 50.0% i I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION. FIELD�,DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.17.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E I Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:1:45-2:45 Plot#: 32 Plot Diameter: 20' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?I ®Yes 1:1 No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ❑No Weather&Notes: Slope I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator - Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page H W I W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .25' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,branches,seeds,roots O A: 0.17' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silt loam,moist None I N 0.5' 10YR,3,3 Dark brown silty sandy fine gravel,very moist None 0.83' 10YR,3,3 Dark brown sandy fine gravel,very moist None 1.0' 10YR,3,4 Dark_yellow brown sandy fine gravel 1/8"—1",very moist 5YR,3,4 <2 I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , 40 I 6" , 115 I 9" , 160 1 12" 280 I 15" , 305 118" , >320 I 21" , 124" Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List 1 I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SE A 6-7% Hole depth: 1.6' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: 1.5' Depth to free water: None I ° J ❑ Inundated ft El Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments LI Shallow root systems ft O re ❑Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" CI Water stained leaves } ❑Soil survey data El FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations 1:1 Morphological adaptations I _ El Matting/Films 1=I Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot 51 Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesfr I I Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/17/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N,OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 13:45- 14:45 Plot#:'3)-PlotDiameter: 20' [ I Wetland Iv] NonWetland 11 Do non-nal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#32 Ij Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator I Identified Plant Species I StratumIndicator (—%) Status 1 (—°/0) 1 Status 1 Alnus rubra T 40 FAC Salix hookeriana T 35 FACW- I1I Rubus spectabilis S 90 FAC+ j m Rubus procerus S 50 FACU 1 D Salix hookerrana S 50 FACW- - I Polystichumm unitum H 10 FACU ZCarex dewe anna H 5 FACU 'i. 1 Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 57:1% I I I I . I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I . ROUTINE ON-SITE iNETLAND DETERM1NATIQN RCELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.17.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28 &29, T24N, RO1 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:2:45-3:35 Plot#: 33 Plot Diameter: 30' ® Wetland 0 ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes:Depression near north road to Parcel II 111 Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status OSee following page 1 H W I W 111 Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW',FACW,FACW-,FAC',andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) i Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .25 Duff layer: leaves,twigs,roots,stems,moss p A: .6 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black peaty muck with decaying organic matter,saturated None N B: 1.0' 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black peaty muck with decaying organic matter,saturated None 0.83' 10YR,2, 1 Black fine mucky sand,saturated None 1.0' 10YR,2,2 Very dark brown mucky silty loam,saturated None I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" . 20 I 6" , 50 1 9" 80 1 12" 120 1 15" , 150 1 18" , >320 I 21" , 1 24" Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Shalcar Muck (50) Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix I ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor .2'-.6'moderate ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils EA Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ❑ Redox Body DepletionsI ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) El Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑No Surface water depth: .4' Slope(down):SE @ 0-1% Hole depth: .8' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: At surface 0 J ® Inundated .4' ft ❑Water marks_<.5'ft ❑Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <.5 ft • ® Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves O ❑Soil survey data ❑ FAC-Neutral test ®Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ ❑Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials ®Other ponding ❑Surface scouring ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot r Present ❑Not Present • HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesf-I Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/17/2005 Legal: „21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 14:45- 15:35 Plot#: 33 PlotDiameter: 30' I#1 WetlandO° _I NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#33 ----- ' �/ Status II, IIdentified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species (atu Status I Stratum I Indicator II I Salix hookeriana T 80 FACW- Populus balsamifera ssp.trichocarpa T 30 I! FAC f11 :Alnus rubra rn FAC Spiraea douglasii S 95 FACW D Rubus spectabilis S 30 FAC+ I ---I _ Carex obnupta H 25 OBL z Carex arcta H 20 OBL Polystichum munitum H 10 FACU • Rubus ursinus vitifolius i H 10 FACU III I Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of l I ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:3:35-4:35 Date: 11.17.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Plot#: 34 Plot Diameter: 15' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Stream ii Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Status OZ See following page I H- H W W 111 Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .15' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,seeds,berries I 0 A:.20' 0.17' 10YR,3,2 Very dark_grey brown sandy fine gravel,roots,moist None 6: 1.5' 0.5' 10YR,3,3 Dark brown silty sandy loam with fine gravel 1/8"-1",moist None 0.83' 10YR,3,3 Dark brown silty sandy loam,very moist None 1 1.0' 10YR,3,3 _ Dark brown silty sandy loam,very moist None 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): II 3" i 60 I 6" i 100 I 9" i 50 1 12" E 80 1 15" c 80 1 18" i 80 1 21" i 120 1 22" i >320 Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils I ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: IGround surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SE(a 6% Hole depth: 1.5' } Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: 1.05' Depth to free water: 1.15' IO —0 ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments I]Shallow root systems ft re ❑Saturated s 12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves } ❑Soil survey data ElFAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other ®Surface scouring(stream)0 Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: I HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ❑Yes i;§No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ❑Present allot Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ❑Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present EI Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? 0 Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation IP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesfi-I ' Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises , Date: 1/17/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 15:35- 16:35 Plot#: 3-f PlotDiameter: 15' LI Wetland ISI NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes .__._..m___.._„ Is the area a potential problem area? No µm Yv Weather and Notes: Plot#34 II I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator r uStatus Identified Plant Stratum Indicator (—%) Satus AcermT 80 FACU Stachys cooleyae varrchamisonis H 15 FACW Thuja plicata T 65 FAC I Carex deweyanna H 10 1 FACU 111, Ill Rubus spectabilis S 65 FAC+ m Rubus procerus ; S 50 FACU Glecoma hederaceae S 25 FACU+ Sambucus racemosa S 20 FACU Zj Polystichum munitum H 85 FACU Tolmiea menziesii H 30 FAC IGlyceria elata-striata H 20 FACW+ Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 15 FACW Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 50.0% II I I I I I I I 1 I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of! I ROUTINE oN s1TE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA F{?RM,. Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.18.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:10:00-11:30 Plot#: 35 Plot Diameter: 25' ® Wetland Q ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Boundary road to South Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: II Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page I IH W Il W Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW,FAC+,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma _J 0: .15' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,seeds,moss,roots O A: .30' 0.17' 10YR,2,2 Very dark brown muck with fine sand,roots,saturated None I N B: .80' 0.5' _ 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,saturated None C: 1.5'+ 0.83' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,saturated None 1.0' _ 2.5Y,2.5, 1 Black muck,saturated None _ I 1.25' 2.5Y,2.5, 1 Black muck,saturated None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , 10 1 6" , 10 1 9" , 10 1 12" , 10 1 15" , 15 1 18" i 40 1 21" , 90 1 24" , 100 IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Shalcar Muck (50) Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix ® Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Slight at.3' ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List l ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: IGround surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): N a.5% Hole depth: 1.4' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .5'(rising) Io J ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems_<.5'ft O • ®Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves c ❑Soil survey data ❑ FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge Aerials® Other ® Surface scouring ® Drift lines(to the N) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesf-I Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/18/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28,29,24N, 01E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 10:00- 11:30 Plot#: 35 PlotDiameter: 25' IsI Wetlandc3 I _1 NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Boundary road to South Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#35 in' __ - (—°/0)t IndicatorStco , Identified Plant Species Stratum , Indicator Stratum Identified Plant Species � L p Status Alnus rubra T 95 FAC Thu'ap licata S 90FAC AC+ Ill Rubus spectabilis I mOplopanax horridus S 30 FAC+ DPolystichum munitum H 35 FACU 1. Tolmiea menziesii H 35 FAC Z1 Athyrium filix-femina H 20 FAC Carex deweyanna H 20 FACU i Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 20 FACW 1 Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 20 FACU Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 66.7% 1 I I I 1 II I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ONSITE' TLAND DETERMII ATt9N°FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.18.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29,T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 11:30 1:30 Plot#: 36 Plot Diameter: 20' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑ No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Stream I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page E- I-- W (.9 _ Percent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma _ii 0: .20' Duff layer:leaves,twigs,stems,grass,roots,fern Ic A: .28' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black silty loam,slightly damp None 0.5' 10YR,2,2 Very dark brown silty loam,damp None 0.83' 10YR,2, 1 Black silty loam,damp None 1.0' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam,damp None I1.5' Compaction in.): 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam,slightly damp None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , 15 1 6" , 20 1 9" , 60 1 12" . 50 1 15" . 85 1 18" , 150 1 21" , 20 1 24" , 170 IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix El Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions 1=1 ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >. Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): E a,4% Hole depth: 1.4' O Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ® No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None I O --I ❑ Inundated O ft E1 Water marks ft El Water borne sediments E1 Shallow root systems ft ix El Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" 11 Water stained leaves C1 ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations I >' ❑Matting/Films _ 111 Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ill Other Waterway lines(to the ) Z Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? N Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot E.Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation IP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesf--( Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/18/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 11:30- 13:30 Plot#:36 PlotDiameter: 20' L Wetland !vi NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No III Weather and Notes: Plot#36 Identified Plant Species { Stratum I Indicator Identified Plant Species I Stratum Indicator �( (—%) i Status (—%) Status Acer macrophyllum T 75 ' FACU Athynum filix-femina H 20 FAC Alnus rubra T 45 1 FAC Polystichum munitum H 20 FACU IRubus spectabilis S 95 FAC+ m Oplopanax horridus S 30 FAC+ D I Sambucus racemosa S 30 FACU IAcer macrophyllumCo S 20 FACU Z -_ ry lus comuta S 20 FACU Rhamnus purshiana S 20 FAC- I Tolmiea menziesii H 40 FAC 1 I Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 25 FACW Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 83.3% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 ROUTINE QN- TE ' I.„ fi bE ' RM „ , ,, FtEL© DATA a tM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:1:30-2:15 Date: 11.18.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Plot#: 37 Plot Diameter: 20' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope(stream) Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status OSee following page I H 4 I— W I W Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .18' Duff layer: leaves,ferns,twigs, moss,roots O A: .15' 0.17' 10YR,3,2 Very dark brown silty sandy loam w/fine gravel 1/8",damp None Cl) 6: .85' 0.5' 10YR,2,2 Very dark brown silty loam decaying wood,moist None C: 1.5'+ 0.83' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam w/fine gravel,damp None 1.0' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey silty loam w/fine gravel,damp None I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq. in.): 3" i 140 I 6" i 100 I 9" 125 1 12" 1135 1 15" 1155 1 18" 1100 1 21" = 60 1 24" 1145 Primary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic HaplumbreptsI Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >- Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): E an 6 7% Hole depth: 1.6' O Soil saturated in hole? ❑ ® Yes No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None OJ ❑ Inundated ft CI Water marks ft CI Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft I Et El Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots El Oxidized root channels<12" Ill Water stained leaves • CI Soil survey data CI FAC-Neutral test El Algae encrustations 1=1 Morphological adaptations _ ❑Matting/Films 1=1 Waterway gauge El Aerials CI Other I ®Surface scouring(stream)®Drift lines(to the E) ❑Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ELYes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®.Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? El Yes ®No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes f I I Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/18/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp 'I Time: 13:30- 14:15 Plot#:37 PlotDiameter: 20' P. Wetland Ivl NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#37 Identified Plant Species (—%) Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator I • Stratum Indicator PStatus I (—%) Status I Acer macrophyllum T 75 FACU I Rubus ursinus vitifolius ' H 20 1 FACU Alnus rubra T 50 FAC ill I Rubus spectabilis S 50 FAC+ I77 Tolmiea menziesii S 35 FAC { Oplopanax horridus S 20 FAC+ 0i H 30 FACW+ 1 Glyceria elata-striata � z I Ranunculus repens H 25 I FACW Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 20 FACW I1 Equisetum arvense i H 20 FAC I Polystichum munitum H 20 FACU Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 70.0% I I 1 I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of l I ROUTINE ONSITE WETLAND-DETERMINATION'HELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:2:15-2:50 Date: 11.18.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Plot#: 38 Plot Diameter: 20' ® Wetland P ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope II Identified Plant Species Stratum % Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page 1 H W • I W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW',FACW,FACW-,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma _J 0:.2' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,stems,seeds,ferns,roots O A: .7' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black silty loam,roots,damp None I N 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black silty loam,roots,damp None 0.83' 10YR,2, 1 Black silty loam,damp None 1.0' 10YR,2,2 Very dark brown silty clay loam None I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 3" . 25 1 6" . 45 1 9" . 30 1 12" i 40 1 15" , 100 1 18" . 80 1 21" , 90 1 24" . 100 IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix I ® Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils CI Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ®No Surface water depth:None Slope(down): SE @ 4% Hole depth: 1.5' 0 Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ®No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None 0 I —I ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft CI Water borne sediments ID Shallow root systems ft O ce ❑Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots [11 Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves C3 El Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations I _ ❑Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge Aerials® ❑Other III Surface scouring ®Drift lines(to the E) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? E(Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot at Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present LI Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation I P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I . ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes ' Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Ili Date: 1/18/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 14:15- 14:50 Plot#:3b PlotDiameter: 20' ,'1 Wetland Pr I NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No 111 Weather and Notes: Plot#38 e Stratum Indicator I _I. Identified Plant Species o � Identified Plant Species , Stratum Indicator 'i �� (—%) Status � Status 1 Alnus rubra T 95 FAC 1 Acer macrophyllum < T 40 FACU Thuja plicata T 20 FAC 'm Rubus spectabilis S 90 FAC+ D I- Oplopanax horridus S 45 FAC+ I - Polystichum munitum S 25 FACU j Z j Sambucus racemosa S 20 FACU Thuja plicate S 20 FAC Tolmiea menziesii H 75 1 - FAC Dryopteris expansa assimi is H 20 FACW Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 83.3% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:2:50-4:20 Date: 11.18.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Plot#: 39 Plot Diameter: 15' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ®Yes ❑No Recently clear cut slash piles Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status O See following page H W I W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) IFeet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma ..j 0: .15' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,stems,roots,grass O A: .4' 0.17' 10YR, 2, 1 Black sandy silt loam w/decaying organic matter,saturated None I N B: .7'+ 0.5' 10YR,3, 1 Very dark grey sandy silty loam,saturated None 0.83' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown sandy loam w/'/z'gravel,saturated None 1.0' 10YR,3,2 Very dark grey brown sandy fine gravel 1/8"-1/2",saturated None I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , 30 I 6" , 250 1 9" , 300 1 12" , 280 1 15" , >320 I 18" , 1 21" , 1 24" IPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class El ❑ Depleted Matrix I ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor LI Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >. Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): NE a 7% Hole depth: 1.0' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: At surface(rain)Depth to free water: .30' 1 O J ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft El Water borne sediments ❑ Shallow root systems ft • ®Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ['Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves CI ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations _ IllMatting/Films ['Waterway gauge ®Aerials El Other ❑ Surface scouring ❑ Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET?1$Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot X Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ❑Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ❑Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com 1 ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesT-( IAddress Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Enterprises , Date: 1/18/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE i Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 14:50- 16:20 Plot#:37 PlotDiameter: 15' (. 1 Wetland ivl NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes Recently clear cut slash piles IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#39 Identified Plant Species state InStatusr Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator I %i° I (--°i°) f Status Alnus rubra T 90 FAC i Holcus lanatus H 75 FAC Rubus procerus A 1 Rubus spectabilis 55 S 45 FACU FA1 Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 30 FAC t+ C+ Festuca rubra H 45 I i m rn Alnus rubra S 40 FAC Agrostis capillaris tenuis H 20 FAC D Salix p i pen S 40 FACW I Juncus effuses H 15 FACW j Pseudotsuga menziesii S 20 FACU+ 1 Cirsium arvense H 10 FACU+ Z Salix sitchensis S 20 FACW Spiraea douglasii S 20 FACW IHolodiscus discolor S 10 None(UPL) Populus balsamifera ssp.trichocarpa S 10 FAC Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 66.7% I I 1 I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE DETERMINATION FIELD DATA TORN Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton 1 Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.21.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:10:10-11:40 Plot#: 40 Plot Diameter: 20' ® Wetland 2 ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Off-site wetland I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ® No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ® No Weather&Notes: Depressional,off-site wetland#2 I Identified Plant Species,off-s %itI dicatStatus r - Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator OSee following page 1 H W 1 W Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW',FACW,FACW-,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer Hue Value Chroma (%) I J 0:,18' Duff layer:leaves,twigs,roots NA: 0.17' 10YR,2,2 Very dark grey sandy silty loam,roots,saturated None I 0.5' 10YR,3, 1 _ Very dark grey sandy silty loam,saturated SYR,4,3 10% 0.83' 10YR, 3,2 Very dark grey brown silty sandy loam wlfine gravel,saturated None 1.0' 10YR,4,2 Dark grey brown silty clay wlfine gravel,saturated None U 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.):- 1 3" n.):13" i 25 1 6" i 20 I 9" i 30 1 12" 50 115" i 100 1 18" i 235 I 21" : 300 1 24" : 300 IPrimary Series Alderwood (3) Taxonomy Dystric Entic Durochrepts Drainage Class Moderately well Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol El D• epleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Slight to moderate.2'-.5' ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions El ❑ G• ley Colors(depleted matrix) Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >_ Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑ No Surface water depth: .8'in center Slope(down): S @ 3-4%at outlet Hole depth: 1.2' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .30' Io J ® Inundated .8' ftce ❑Water marks .501t 11 Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <.5' ft O ® Saturated<_ 12" ®Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves in ❑ Soil survey data ❑ FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations El Morphological adaptations I _ ❑ Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge Z Aerials ❑Other ❑ Surface scouring Waterway lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? l .Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophytic vegetation in representative plot Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? 0 Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No I RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present 0 Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest-- t 1 Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises I Date: 1/21/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29,24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 10:10- 11:40 Plot#:i p PlotDiameter: 20' !v! Wetland_] NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Off-site wetland -Oa- _._� Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No IIIWeather and Notes: Plot#40 --- � r Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species(^oI StratuIndicator ) Status (-°/0)-_ Status Salix hookeriana T 75 FACW- 1 Carex amplifolia H 20 FACW+ G Salix lucida var. lasiandra T 45 FACW+ i Geum macrophyllum H 20 FACW- ' Pyrus fusca T 20 FACW an culu- --_ � tTl Alnus rubra 1 T 30 FAC , C Ranunculus repens H 20 FACW mMalus fusca or y Carex deweyanna H 15 FACU I� _ Rubus spe t bilis uisetum e i S 20 FAC D S 20 FAC+ 4 ZThuja plicate S 20 FAC i Glecoma hederaceae S 10 FACU+ Rubus laciniatus S 10 FACU+ Elymus glaucus H 40 FACU Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 88.9% I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 oft I ROUTINEx ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 11:40-12:20 Date: 11.21.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Plot#: 41 Plot Diameter: 20' ❑ Wetland ® Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope north of wetland#2 I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status ZO See following page II— W I W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW',FACW,FACW-,FAC',and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) IFeet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma t J 0: .14' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,branches,seeds,roots 0 A: 0.17' 10YR,3,3 Dark brown,sandy loam w/fine gravel'/,",slightly moist None I N 0.5' 10YR,4,3 Brown sandy loam w/fine gravel''1h"-1/2",slightly moist None 0.83' 10YR,4,3 Brown silty sandy loam w/fine gravel,slightly moist None _ 1.0' 2.5Y,4,3 Olive brown sandy loam w/fine gravel,moist None I 1.45' Compaction (lbs/sq. in.): 13" 165 1 6" . 290 1 9" >320 1 12" 1 15" , 1 18" , 1 21" , 1 24" UPrimary Series Alderwood (3) Taxonomy Dystric Entic Durochrepts Drainage Class Moderately well Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class I ❑ Histosol ❑ Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >- Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): W a 3 5% Hole depth: 1.45' O Soil saturated in hole? ❑Yes ® No Depth to saturated soil: None Depth to free water: None 0 I J ❑ Inundated ft ❑Water marks ft El Water borne sediments ❑Shallow root systems ft O ce ❑ Saturated<_ 12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ❑Water stained leaves } ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations _ 01 Matting/Films El Waterway gauge ❑Aerials ❑Other I ❑ Surface scouring ❑ Drift lines(to the ) ❑Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ❑Yes fa No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ❑Present N.Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? 0 Yes®No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ❑Yes IS No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ®Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ❑Yes ®No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT 0 Present ®Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWest-I Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises i Date: 1/21/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, 01E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 11:40- 12:20 l' Plot#: // PlotDiameter: 20' I _ Wetland ["i NonWetland IDo normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No I Is the area a potential problem area? NowW I Weather and Notes: Plot#41 Identified Plant Species j Stratum Indicator I Identified Plant Species Stratumi Indicator I (-%) Status 1 (—%) 1 Status i Alnus rubra ! T 55 FAC ' Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 30 FACU Salix hookeriana T 35 FACW- Lactuca muralis H 25 None Im Populus balsamifera ssp.trichocarpa T 25 FAC Polystichum munitum H 25 FACU rRubus procerus S 50 FACU r Hypericum perforatum H 20 None Crataegus oxyacantha S 20 None Pteridium aquilinum H 20 FACU Cytisus scoparius S 20 None(UPL) zRubus parviflourus S 20 FAC- 1 Thuja plicata , S 20 FAC 1 Ranunculus repens 1 H 70 FACW 1 Elymus glaucus H 35 FACU Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 50.0% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 ROUTINE ON-SITE WETL AND DETERM1NAIION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.21.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:12:20-1:55 Plot#: 42 Plot Diameter: 25' ® Wetland B ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status (-%) Status ZZ See following page 1 N W - IIIW IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW',FACW,FACW,FAC',and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .18' Duff layer:leaves,twigs,seeds,roots,ferns O A: .6' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck,saturated None I Cl) B: 1.4'+ 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 muck with sand,very wet None 0.83' 2.5Y,3,2 Very dark grey brown sandy silt,saturated None 1.0' 2.5Y,3,2 Very dark grey brown sandy silt w/fine gravel,saturated 10YR,3,3 5% 1.5' I Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" , 15 1 6" , 180 1 9" , 120 1 12" , 120 1 15" , 210 1 18" , >320 1 21" , 1 24" IPrimary Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly Included Series Shalcar Muck (50)Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix ® Histic Epipedon In center of swale ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Slight to moderate.2'-.4' ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime In center of swale ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions 1.0'—1.4' El ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑ No Surface water depth: Seep, .1' Slope(down): WNW(a.6% Hole depth: 1.4' t7 Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .85'rising I ° J ® Inundated .1' ftgt ❑Water marks ft CI Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <51t• ® Saturated<_12" ®Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves } ❑ Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations Ci Morphological adaptations I _ 111Matting/Films ❑ Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ❑Aerials CI Other ® Drift lines(to the W) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hydrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for hvdric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation IP.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes}— 1 I Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/21/2005 Legal: „21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 12:20- 13:55 Plot#:la PlotDiameter: 25' `N/J Wetlandgl I NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No 111 Weather and Notes: Plot#42 Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator I Identified Plant Species T /° Status (—')/0) D o teas ex'an d PSamt,Species (—% Status I P Salix lucida var.lasiandra 60 C ry p p H 20 FACW j.,e, Salix hookeriana T 50 FACW- Geum macrophyllum I H 20 � FACW- iAlnus rubra T 40 FAC Lysichiton americanum H 20 OBL m Rubus spectabilis S 85 FAC+ Polystichum munitum H 20 FACU J_P rep > j FACW D Thuja licata S 25 FAC Ranunculus re ens H 20 Ribes lacustre S 20 FAC+ I Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 20 FACU IL Q z Tolmiea menziesii H 55 FAC Carex deweyanna H 35 FACU II Athyrium fllix-femina H 20 FAC Carex obnupta H 20 OBL Percent of dominantstratum,>2,% >20no ties)° per species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 78.6% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITg W411.04DATERIONATION FIELD DATA FORT Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 11.21.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, ROlE Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:1:55-3:30 Plot#: 43 Plot Diameter: 30' ® Wetland B ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ® No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Depressional I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-DM Status Identified Plant Speciesecies Stratum Indicator -% Status 1 O See following page I H W I W IPercent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW-,FAC',andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .22' Duff layer: sedge leaves,leaves, needles,roots O A: 0.17' 5YR,2.5, 1 Black muck,saturated None I N 0.5' 5YR,2.5, 1 Black peaty muck,saturated None 0.83' 5YR,2.5, 1 Black peaty muck,saturated None 1.0' 5YR,2.5, 1 Black peaty muck,saturated None 1.5' 5YR,2.5, 1 Black peaty muck,saturated None Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 13" i 25 I 6" i 20 1 9" ; 10 1 12" , 10 1 15" i 20 1 18" i 20 1 21" , 10 1 24" i 20 Primary Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly Included Series Shalcar Muck (50)Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly ® Histosol ® Depleted Matrix 0-1.5'+ M Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils III ® Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List 1 ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >. Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑No Surface water depth: 1'-2' Slope(down): Level Hole depth: 1.8' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: At surface II O J ® Inundated 1 -2' ft ❑Water marks ft El Water borne sediments ® Shallow root systems <.1'ft O Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves CI ❑Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑ Morphological adaptations I _ ❑Matting/Films ❑Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials 2003 1=1 Other — ❑Drift lines(to the ) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT Z Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation I P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: f" � WTJK-Triwa Wes I Address Bremerton Y 1 Site Owner: Triway Enterprises I Date: 1/21/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, O 1 E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: 13:55- 15:30 1Plot#:1/3 PlotDiameter: 30' !vI WetlandBI.1 NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#43 _.. • Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Identified Plant Species ` (--%) Status (-%) Status Thuja plicata T 70 FAC Equisetum arvense H 25 FAC I to oph S 20 ACU Epilobium ciliatum H 20 FACW ' � G FACU- Tsuga heterophylla T 15 a i H 20 FACW+ � Budd etaGalium trifidum � m _- - A Solanum dulcamara H 20 FAC+ Salix hookeriana - _ -- --- —_ S 20 FACW- I Y D p S 10 FAC- 1 [Ath num filix-femina H 15 FAC '- Carexamplifol�aiana I I H 80 FACW+ z1 Phalaris arundinaceae H 60 FACW Potamogeton natans H 40 OBL Juncus effusus H 35 FACW 1 Glyceria elata-striata H 30 FACW+ Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 83.3% t I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE 014- 1TE-WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM, Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:3:30-4:50 Date: 11.21.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Plot#: 44 Plot Diameter: 20' ® Wetland A ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope in swale Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator-- 11 (-%) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page — I ~ H W W IPercent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma _J 0:.15' Duff layer: leaves,ferns,roots,seeds,twigs _ O A: .5' 0.17' 2.5Y,2.5, 1 Black muck,saturated None — I N B: 1.2'+ 0.5' 2.5Y,2.5, 1 Black mucky silty clay,saturated None _ 0.83' 2.5Y,2.5, 1 Black silty clay,saturated 5YR,4,3 5% _ 1.0' 2.5Y, 2.5, 1 Black mucky silty clay,saturated 5YR,4,3 15% _ I1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): 1 3" , 40 I 6" , <10 I 9" , 25 1 12" , 60 1 15" , 75 1 18" 40 1 21" 25 1 24" 40 J Primary Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Ha la uepisDrainage ClassPoorly Included Series Shalcar Muck (50)Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix I ® Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Moderate at.2'-.8' ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions 11 Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ® Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I . } Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth: Seeps.05' Slope(down): E @ 3-5% Hole depth: 1.2' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .20'rising I O J ❑ Inundated ft El Water marks ft ID Water borne sediments ® Shallow root systems ft O ®Saturated<_12" ['Adventitious roots 1=1 Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves } CI Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations CI Morphological adaptations I _ EI Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge Aerials® ❑Other ❑ Surface scouring ®Drift lines(to the E) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot (El Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicatorls)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicatorls)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes i--I Address Bremerton tSite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/21/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, 01 E Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 15:30- 16:50 Plot#: yy rlotDiameter: 20' Iv Wetland A) 1 NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No IIs the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#44 II(� ) Indicator I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Status (—%) Status i Identified Plant Species Stratum Alnus rubra T 60 FAC Polystichum munitum I H 15 I FACU Thuja plicata T 50 FAC Im Rubus spectabilis S 75 FAC+ M 1 Thuja plicata S 20 FAC DDryopteris expansa assimilis H 75 FACW Tiarella trifoliata var trifoliata H 35 FAC- zi Asarum caudatum H 25 FACU Equisetum arvense H 20 FAC Lysichiton americanum i H 20 OBL I Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 20 FACU Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 83.3% 1 I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE;oN SrrE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC I Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time:1:00-1:30 Date: 11.28.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Plot#: 45 Plot Diameter: 20' ® Wetland C ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ® No Weather&Notes: Slope 11 11 Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator . (-%) Status ZSee following page it- '— w ict I ILI 1 Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,and/or FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox I Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0: .18' Duff layer: leaves,twigs,ferns,roots _ 5 A: .45' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black muck None B: 1.0'+ 0.5' 10YR,4,2 Dark grey brown silty clay,very moist 7.5YR,4,6 25% _ 0.83' 10YR,4,2 Dark grey brown silty clay,very moist 7.5YR,4,6 30% _ 1.0' _ I 1.5' _ Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I 3" ' 6" I 9" 12" 15" , 118" . 121" • 124" • I I ue.is Drainage Class Poorly TaxonomyMesic Mollic Hap aq p Primary Series Norma (37) 9 ry Included Series Taxonomy Drainage Class ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix .45' I ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ® Redox Body Depletions .45'-1.0' ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ® Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I >_ Ground surface inundated? ❑Yes ® No Surface water depth: None Slope(down): San.4% Hole depth: 1.0' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: At surface Depth to free water: .15' Io J ❑ Inundated ft El Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems_<.4'ft ®Saturated<_12" El Adventitious roots El Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves C31E1Soil survey data ❑FAC-Neutral test ElAlgae encrustations ElMorphological adaptations _ ❑ Matting/Films ElWaterway gauge ®Aerials ❑Other I ❑Surface scouring ® Drift lines(to the SW) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophvtic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot 0 Present ❑Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM - Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesI / Address Bremerton 1 Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 1/28/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28,29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp 'i Time: 13:00- 13:30 Plot#:1/s PlotDiameter: 20' ISI WetlandCl -! NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No 1 Is the area a potential problem area? No Weather and Notes: Plot#45 __ --_ e. Statusat Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Identified Plant Species � (—%) -- i i (—%°) Status Alnus rubra T 70 FAC Tolmiea menziesii H 20 I FAC Thuja plicata T 65 FAC IA i Rubus spectabilis S 40 FAC+ 1 m Ribes lacustre S 20 FAC+ Vaccinium ovatum S 20 None ' O Gaultheria shallop I S 12 FACU Z ' Carex obnupta H 85 OBL Blechnum spicant j H 35 FAC+ IPolystichum munitum H 25 FACU Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 20 FACU Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 85.7% I I I I I I I I I I Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 of 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM; Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Date: 12.07.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01 E Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: 11:00-11:50 Plot#: 46 Plot Diameter: 25' Z Wetland H ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?I ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator (-%) Status Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator— (-%) Status ZZ See following page H H W I W _ Percent of dominant(50120 rule)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW,FAC+,andlor FAC: — Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) I Feet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma J 0:.15' Duff layer: leaves,stems,seeds _ p A:.3' 0.17' 10YR,2, 1 Black mucky peat,very damp None CO B: 1.4'+ 0.5' 10YR,2, 1 Black mucky silty clay loam,saturated None _ 0.83' 10YR,2, 1 None _ 1.0' 10YR,2, 1 Black mucky silty clay,saturated None _ I 1.5' Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): I l 3„ I 6" I 9" 12" 1 15" • 1 18" . 121" • 124" J IIPrimary Series Kilchis-Shelton (27) Taxonomy Mesic Lithic Haplumbrepts Drainage Class Well drained Included Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaciuepts Drainage Class Poorly I ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix >1.0' ® Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Slight.4' ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic El Peraquic Moisture Regime ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List I ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I }, Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑ No Surface water depth: .4"in center Slope(down): S(a)2-3% Hole depth: 1.4' 0 Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑ No Depth to saturated soil: .3' Depth to free water: .5' Io J ® Inundated .4'ft ❑Water marks ft ❑Water borne sediments ®Shallow root systems <.4'ft c ®Saturated<_12" ❑Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves 13 ❑Soil survey data El FAC-Neutral test ❑Algae encrustations ❑Morphological adaptations j _ ❑Matting/Films ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials ❑Other ❑ Surface scouring ®Drift lines(to the 5) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes ❑No IRATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com I I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWes I--I Address Bremerton ISite Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 12/7/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp I Time: 11:00- 11:50 Plot#:U6 PlotDiameter: 25' [v] Wetlandtt1 l NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No I Is the area a potential problem area? No mm _W,µN✓� �_ Yv Weather and Notes: Plot#46 p Strat°) Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum 20 Indicator Identified Plant Species Status Alnus rubra T 35 FAC j Cmna latifolia Thuja plicata T 30 FAC Rubus ursinus vitifolius H 15 FACU IRl Spiraea douglasii S 60 FACW m n � Salix lucida var. lasiandra S 50 FACW+ -I r D ; Rubus spectabilis S 35 FAC+ I; Thuja plicata S 20 FAC Z i Oenanthe sarmentosa H 90 OBL Sparganium eurycarpum H 35 OBL IMentha arvensis H 25 FACW- 1 Carex obnupta H 20 - OBL Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 100.0% II I I 1 I I I I 1 I . 1 Page 1 of 1 Sunday,March 12,2006 I ROUTINEON-SITE WETLAND DE'TERI INATION.FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site:WTJK-TriwayWestHillsBremerton-1 Address: Bremerton I Site Owner: Triway Investments, LLC Wetland Biologist: Jonathan Kemp Time: Date: 12.07.05 Legal: Sec 21 &28&29, T24N, R01E Plot#: 47 Plot Diameter: 10' ® Wetland F ❑ Non Wetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? ®Yes ❑No I Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? ❑Yes ®No Is the area a potential problem area? ❑Yes ®No Weather&Notes: Slope I Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator Identified Plant Species Stratum Indicator - (-V.) Status (-%) Status ZO See following page I H W - W 1 Percent of dominant(50/20 rule)species that are OBL,FACW*,FACW,FACW,FAC*,andlor FAC: Horizon Sample Matrix Color Soil Characteristics Redox Color Redox Layers Depth Munsell(Moist) Color Texture Plant Material Moisture Structure Fill &Layer (%) IIFeet BGS Hue Value Chroma Hue Value Chroma r J 0: Duff layer: leaves,twigs,cones,fronds O A: 0.17' Organic NoneI _B: 0.5' 10YR, 2, 1 Black muck,saturated,loose None = 0.83' 1.0' _ Fill: None 1.5' _ I Compaction (lbs/sq.in.): l I 3,, ' g» I 9,, 112" 15" , I 18" . 121,E • 124" • 1 IIIPrimary Series Norma (37) Taxonomy Mesic Mollic Haplaquepts Drainage Class Poorly Included Series Shalcar Muck (50)Taxonomy Mesic Terric Medisaprists Drainage Class Very poorly ❑ Histosol ® Depleted Matrix ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ® Sulfidic Odor Slight to moderate ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ® Aquic❑ Peraquic Moisture Regime Seeps ® Listed on Local or National Hydric Soils List 1 ❑ Redox Body Depletions ❑ Gley Colors(depleted matrix) ❑ Redox Concentrations(soft masses/pore linings) ❑ Reduced Matrix(gleyed) ❑ Redox Concentrations(nodules/concretions) ❑ Notes: I } Ground surface inundated? ®Yes ❑ No Surface water depth: .2' Slope(down): SE @ 10% Hole depth: .5' O Soil saturated in hole? ®Yes ❑No Depth to saturated soil: Surface Depth to free water: At surface I O J ® Inundated .2'ftre ❑Water marks ft ®Water borne sediments ® Shallow root systems <.5'ft ®Saturated<_12" ®Adventitious roots ❑Oxidized root channels<12" ®Water stained leaves } ❑Soil survey data IIIFAC-Neutraltest ❑Algae encrustations ID Morphological adaptations I = ❑Matting/Films ®Surface scouring ❑Waterway gauge ®Aerials 2004 ❑Other ®Drift lines(to the SE) ®Wetland drainage patterns Notes: HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale: Criterion for>50%hvdrophytic vegetation in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present I HYDRIC SOIL CRITERION MET? ®Yes 0 No Rationale: Criterion for hydric soil indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present 0 Not Present WETLAND HYDROLOGY CRITERION MET? ®Yes❑No Rationale:Criterion for wetland hydrology indicator(s)in representative plot ®Present ❑Not Present JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE: IS THE PLANT COMMUNITY A WETLAND? ®Yes 0 No RATIONALE FOR JURISDICTIONAL DECISION: ALL THREE WETLAND CRITERION IN REPRESENTATIVE PLOT ®Present ❑Not Present EnCo Environmental Corporation P.O.Box 731747•Puyallup,WA 98373•253.841.9710 office•253.841.0264 fax•jonkemp30@msn.com 1 I ROUTINE ON-SITE WETLAND DETERMINATION FIELD DATA FORM Project/Site: WTJK-TriwayWesi--( Address Bremerton Site Owner: Triway Enterprises Date: 12/7/2005 Legal: „ 21, 28, 29, 24N, OlE Wetland Biologist: J.K. Kemp Time: - Plot#:L19 PlotDiameter: 10' Ivl Wetland f[ I NonWetland Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes Has the vegetation,soils,and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? No Is the area a potential problem area?I No Weather and Notes: Plot#47 r to Status I Identified Plant Species o [ Identified Plant Species 1 Stratum Indicator Stratum Indicator (_%) Status I -I Alnus rubra T 50 FAC Lysichiton americanum I H 10 1 OBL 1. e Thuja plicate T 50 FAC Im Tsuga heterophylla T 15 FACU- m Rubus spec1abilis j S 65 FAC+ D ; Oplopanax horridus S 30 FAC+ I i 11 _-I ! Dryopteris expansa assimilis H 20 FACW Polystichum munitum H 20 FACU Tolmiea menziesii H 20 FAC Equisetum arvense H 15 FAC Carex deweyanna H 10 FACU ii Percent of dominant(>20%,>2 per stratum,no ties)species that are OBL,FACW+,FACW,FACW-,FAC+,and/or FAC: 85.7% II I I I I I I I I I 1 Sunday,March 12,2006 Page 1 41 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ID 1 1 1 1 1 1 EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 ' APPENDIX D ' FIELD PROCEDURES 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments■Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation,Mitigation&Restoration 1 I I FIELD PROCEDURES I WETLAND DELINEATION WITH I CATEGORY & BUFFER DETERMINATIONS West Hills Residential Development I South of West Werner Road Sections 21, 28, & 29, Township 24N, Range 01E Bremerton, Kitsap County WA 98 I 1 .0 PERSONNEL 1 The field work was performed by Mr. Jonathan M. Kemp, Wildlife, Fisheries and Wetland Biologist employee from EnCo Environmental Corporation (EnCo) of Puyallup. IThe work was performed on the dates specified in the report text. 2.0 WETLAND UNITS FOR RATING AccordingI to the WADOE ratingmanual the footprint of certain wetlands can be divided P I into smaller"units" prior to rating. The types of environmental conditions where wetlands can be separated into smaller"units" are explained in the referenced WADOE rating manual used for this study. IWetlands in a Series of Depressions in a Valley I For wetlands in a series of depressions along stream or river corridors may contain constrictions where the wetland narrows between two or more depressions. If surface water flows back and forth freely it is not a separate unit. If the flow is unidirectional, I down-gradient, with an elevation change (not defined, assume 6 inches) from one part to the other, then a separate unit should be created. The justification for separating wetland increases as the flow between two areas becomes more unidirectional and has 111 a higher velocity. Wetlands Associated with Streams or Rivers IFor wetlands associated with streams or rivers the stream or river wetland may be broken into "units" using criteria based on hydrologic factors or vegetation as presented I in the most recent edition (August 2004) of the WADOE Wetland Rating Manual. In summary, wetlands may be rated separately using criteria based on change in the water regime or vegetation. These changes include: IWater Regime Changes • A tributary coming into the main stream that increase the water flow by at least 25% EnCo Environmental Corporation I1 I • A weir or dam • A series of rapids ' Vegetation Changes 9es r • Lack of vegetation (<30% cover in all classes) replaced with unvegetated bars or banks for at least 50 feet along the stream or river • The vegetation becomes narrow (<30 feet in width) for a linear distance of at least 100 feet MWetlands Bisected by Human-Made Features When a wetland is divided by a human-made feature, such as a road embankment, the ' wetland should not be divided into different "units" if there is a level surface-water connection between the two parts of the wetland systems. In this case surface water should be able to flow equally well between the two wetland areas. If the bottom of the culvert or other structure which lies beneath the road is above the high water marks in the receiving wetland, or if the high-water marks on either side of the road differ by more than 6 inches in elevation then the two wetlands may be rated as two separate wetland "units". Identifying Wetlands in a Patchwork on the Landscape (Mosaic) ' If the wetland being categorized is in a mosaic of wetlands, the entire mosaic should be considered one unit when: • Each patch of wetland is less than 1 acre (0.4 hectares), and • Each patch is less than 100 ft (30 m) apart, on the average, and i • The areas delineated as vegetated wetland are more than 50% of the total area of the wetlands and the uplands together, or wetlands, open water, and river ' bars. If these criteria are not met, each area should be considered as an individual unit. 3.0 TEST PLOTS AND SOIL PROBES The field work and was limited to land located within the boundary of the identified parcel(s). A cursory inspection was made on the subject property prior to performing the wetland delineation to assess the types of plant communities, surface hydrologic conditions, and hydric soil conditions. Sample plots were then randomly selected to represent the characteristics of plant communities. Generally, sample plots were chosen where upland plants change to facultative or facultative wet understory plants, where there was evidence of extended standing or pooled surface water, suspect or observed saturated soils, selected topographic depressions or flats, or at the base or toe of selected drainage ways and/or ravines. EnCo Environmental Corporation 2 r Test plots were evaluated to determine if shade or surface hydrologic conditions were contributing to the predominance of facultative plant species. Test plots were established in upland (non-wetland) and in wetland communities (if applicable) in order to identify the transition between wetland and nonwetland boundaries. Test plots were dug with a trenching shovel with a 1.3 foot long blade. The dimensions of the test plots were approximately 20 inches deep by 9 inches wide. Data was obtained and evaluated at each test plot for vegetation, soil, and hydrology. A wooden stake or marker (flagged with colored tape) was placed at each test plot. Each wooden stake was labeled (using indelible ink) with a discrete test plot number(i.e. Plot 1). Test plot data forms are presented in APPENDIX C. A 1-inch diameter probe was frequently used to sample soil and note soil characteristics and hydrologic conditions to a depth of about 12 inches or more in order to help define the wetland boundaries when placing the flags. 4.0 WETLAND DELINEATION METHOD Wetlands were identified by determining the presence of three characteristics as described in the references listed in the wetland delineation report The Army Corps of Engineers 1987 manual describes three levels of on-site investigation methods. Sites that are small (less than 5 acres) and/or which have homogeneous vegetation are well ' suited for the Routine Wetland Determination method. Larger or more diverse sites may require intermediate or comprehensive investigations. Because this project site is not complex, the Routine Wetland Determination method was employed with emphasis on all three criteria: vegetation types, soil characteristics, and hydrologic conditions. ' 4.1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Boundaries between wetland and non-wetland areas were established by assessing the transitional gradient between hydrophytic vegetation and upland vegetation criteria. In cases where the on-site vegetation in a plot was significantly disturbed a visual inspection was performed on undisturbed areas located contiguous or very near to the plot. In these cases undisturbed (or less disturbed) off-site vegetation was used to interpret whether the hydrophytic vegetation criteria was met on the plot. The observed dominant vegetation species were recorded onto a field data form. Nomenclature of the identified plant species generally followed guidelines in Hitchcock and Cronquist - 2001. A college degreed botanist was contracted to key out plants which could not be accurately identified in the field. Dominant species in each stratum were ranked in decreasing order of abundance and cumulatively totaled, exceed 50% (not equal to 50%) of the total dominance measure for that stratum, plus any additional plant species comprising 20% or more of the total ' dominance measure for the stratum. At least two plant species (including non- EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 3 r dominants) were counted in each stratum where more than two species exist. In cases where species have the same cover(tie) both species were counted. Dominant species were compared to their respective indicator status (U.S.D.A. - 1993). When more than 50% of the dominant species in the plot for all stratums had an indicator status of OBL, FACW+, FACW, FACW-, FAC+ and/or FAC, the hydrophytic criteria for vegetation was met. Indicator categories for vegetation status are presented below: ' Obligate Wetland (OBL): Occur almost always (estimated probability greater than 99%) under natural conditions in wetlands. Facultative Wetland (FACW): Usually occur in wetlands (estimated probability 67% - 99%) but occasionally found in non-wetlands. ' Facultative (FAC): Equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands (estimated probability 34% - 66%). Facultative Upland (FACU): Usually occur in non-wetlands (estimated probability 67% - 99%) but occasionally found in wetlands (estimated probability 1% - 33%). Obligate Upland (UPL): Occur in wetlands in another region but occur almost always (estimated probability >99%) under natural conditions in non-wetlands in the region indicated. If a species does not occur in wetlands in any region, it is not on the National 1 List. 4.2 Hydric Soil n r lI two to four subsurface soils were collected at each testplot usinga long- bladed Generally g bladed trenching shovel and a 1-inch diameter, open sided, soil probe. Soil samples ' were evaluated beneath the 0 horizon (in the A, B, or C horizons) and/or at approximately 2 inches, 6 inches, and from 10 inches to 12 inches below ground ' surface, depending on soil characteristics, hydric soil indicators, and/or observed moisture conditions. Soil samples were visually compared to the 2000 edition of the Munsell soil color charts. The observed colors were recorded onto a field data form. Soil color can be used to infer parent material, percent organic content, or soil drainage characteristics. For example, soils with both low chroma and value (10YR, 2, 2) are very dark-colored and tend to have high organic matter contents; soils with a Munsell t chroma code of 2 or less (10YR, 7, 2) may be poorly drained. Generally, soils were classified as potentially being hydric when the matrix chroma was 2 or less than 2 in soils with distinctive redox concentrations (>2 percent) and 1 or less in soils with no redox concentrations or with few (indistinct) redox concentrations. Distinct redox concentrations are an indication that the soil goes through alternating periods of extended soil saturation and drying. Other field indicators used to determine whether the soils were hydric included visual ' observation, color matching of redox concentrations and/or gleying, iron and EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 4 manganese concretions, sulfidic conditions, histic epipedons, organic soils (i.e. Histosols), aquic or peraquic moisture regimes, reducing soil conditions, texture, high organic matter (i.e. mucks or peats), and observed moisture content. County Soil Conservation Service hydric soils lists were reviewed where applicable. Soil texture describes the relative dominance in size of soil particle smaller than 2 millimeters in diameter. Sand, silt, and clay are the three size classes with sand being the largest size and clay being the smallest. The textural names are applied based on the weight percentage of sand (S), silt (Si), and clay (C). The field estimate of percent sand, silt and clay are given with the textural name. IMottling indicates the evidence of slow vertical movement of surface water through the upper low permeable barns to the top of the till and long duration saturation of this soil, which, normally occurs during he wet winter periods. Due to the very dense and cemented nature of the till, percolated water does not flow through the till, but flows laterally across the top of the till, and therefore mottling occurs near the transition between the upper loam and the till layer. Penetration Resistance A diagnostic tool for measuring the extent and depth of subsurface compaction is a penetrometer. A penetrometer consists of a 30-degree circular stainless steel cone with a driving shaft and a pressure gauge. The penetrometer comes with two cones, one with a base diameter of 0.798 (3/4) inches for soft soils and the other with a base diameter of 0.505 (1/2) inches for hard soils. The tip is slightly wider than the driving shaft to limit friction of the shaft with the surrounding soil. The driving shaft is graduated every 3 inches for determining the depth of compaction. The pressure gauge indicates pressure in pound per square inch (psi). The penetrometer is designed to mimic a plant ' root. Root penetration decrease linearly with penetration resistance. Almost no roots penetrate into soil with a penetration resistance level greater than 300 psi. This is true in both wet and dry soils and is independent of soil texture. 1 For best results thep enetrometer readings should be taken when the whole soil profile is a field capacity (approximately 24 hours after a soaking rain). If the soil is too wet compaction could be underestimated because the soil acts as a liquid. If the soil is too dry compaction could be overestimated because roots will be able to penetrate the soil when it dampens. The penetrometer rod is driven in the soil at a rate of approximately 1 inch per second. As the penetrometer is pushed into the soil the depth and indicated pressure is ' recorded onto a field data sheet every three inches bgs. As the rod is pushed into the soil the depth at which the soil compaction exceeds 300 psi is also recorded. This ' depth is considered the top of the highly compacted zone. The unit is then pushed down until the pressure falls below 300 psi. This is considered the bottom of the highly compacted zone. For each measuring point the top of the compaction zone and the bottom of the compaction zone is recorded. If penetration resistance does not increase ' EnCo Environmental Corporation 5 I above 300p si then this condition indicates no severe root-limiting compaction. If penetration resistance increases above 300 psi but does not fall below 300 psi with depth then there is no bottom of the compaction zone within the maximum depth of the probe (24 inches). As a general guide (Penn State —2002) soil penetration resistance readings compared to percentage of root penetration are listed below: ' Penetration Resistance (psi) Root Penetration (%) ' 75 80 100 67 150 50 I 200 33 300 0 4.3 Wetland Hydrology Visual indicators of hydrology were observed at each test plot and these data were ' recorded onto a field data form. Examples of wetland hydrology indicators observed in the field included inundation, saturated soil zones, water marks, drift lines, waterborne sediment deposits, water-stained leaves, adventitious roots, oxidized root channels, shallow root systems, morphological adaptations, surface scoured areas, algae encrustation, matting or surface films, and topographic and wetland drainage patterns. Wetland hydrology is determined based on an "average year" of wetness that prevails in most years. Extended wetness occurring in most years is defined as roughly every ' other year on average. This definition for average year wetness has been the standard for wetland delineation methods in the United States. ' Saturation in the root zone is fundamental for defining wetland hydrology. The majority of roots tend to occur within one foot of the ground surface. Generally, most of the roots in wetland herbs occur within the upper 6 inches and in woody plants within the upper 6 to 18 inches. Slope percentage was measured in the field using one of three methods: 1 1. Interpreting elevation contours from local USGS topographic maps 2. Visual estimation 3. Using a STABILA level and electronic inclinometer, Model/Type 86 4. Referring to a recent professional survey with elevations of the subject property ' 5.0 WETLAND CLASSIFICATION Wetland boundaries were established based on the presence of hydric soil, hydrophytic ' vegetation, and indicators of wetland hydrology. Topographic changes within the EnCo Environmental Corporation 1 6 1 context of the landscape were also used to aid in the placement of the flags along the wetland edge. Centerlines or the ordinary high water mark of streams were identified ' and marked with a different color flag that was used for the wetland delineation. If all three wetland parameters (hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology) were met, a positive wetland determination was made for that test plot and community. If any one or more of the three parameters was not wetland in character the area was considered upland (non-wetland) unless the area was determined to be abnormal, significantly disturbed (atypical), or problematic. Abnormal, significantly disturbed (atypical), or problematic areas may include situations where field indicators of one or more of the three wetlands identification criteria are obliterated or not present due to recent change, land use, or other difficult situations. A I decision as to whether or not the assessed area is abnormal, significantly disturbed (atypical), or problematic was made and recorded after review of aerial photographs, surface and subsurface soil characteristics, hydrologic conditions, Soil Conservation Service/Natural Resource District soils manuals, county hydric soils lists, wetland atlases, wetland inventory maps, and/or local site conditions in the near vicinity of each plot. 6.0 WETLAND DELINEATION MAP ' The topographic contours, site features, man-made structures, test plots, and marked perimeter of the wetland and buffer (estimated) boundaries were surveyed and plotted to scale on a map by a local professional surveyor. The boundaries depicted on the ' attached Wetland Delineation Map should be considered accurate only to the degree permitted by the implied plotting, sketching, measuring, or surveying methods. ' 7.0 SIGNAGE ' Wetland buffer signs must be placed around the outer perimeter of each delineated wetland on the subject property. The signs must be placed in a clearly visible location along the outer edge of the approved wetland buffers at a distance from each other as ' presented in the jurisdictional governmental agency regulations. The signs must be affixed to permanent treated wood or metal fence posts by the landowner or representative of the landowner after the wetland boundary and final buffer width has ' been approved by the applicable jurisdictional regulatory agency. The signs shall be placed at a minimum of three feet above the ground surface and set deep enough in the ground so that they cannot be pulled out by hand. Generally, signage should be placed i I every 30 to 100 linear feet, depending on government regulations. The signs shall state Wetland Buffer Boundary". EnCo Environmental Corporation I7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m 1 . EnC0 Environmental Corporation I APPENDIX E ' REGULATORY FORMS, CORRESPONDENCE, AND DOCUMENTS WADOE Wetland Category Rating Forms — October 1991 Jurisdictional Governmental Agency Regulation Excerpts Government Agency Correspondence (WADNR &WAF&W) ' Other Documents and Excerpts I Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation,Mitigation&Restoration I \4'^J 00GE9l- 517. fic1 ) 9E WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM • I _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: Ove V�ehl Affiliation: \%(1 CQ riNAV ‘ref Date: ` °`s Name of wetland (if known): WeflG".d(f 1f 1 'J — as( j )6 . Government Jurisdiction of wetland: C ' ! c � "` . I Location: S: of 1/4 S: 5 W SEC: TWNSHP: "2"4/t11 RNGE: . ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map: NWI map: I" Aerial Photo:2.cc)3Soils survey: Other: / Describe: �ccd 2/0i 1 r,: We ' l , - AP -- , MArs- IWhen office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: I.0 I ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA . CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in "CATEGORY"column. qualifies) Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I ' Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? NO I .. Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or -W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next Iby the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question Wo • Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I I Federally Iisted or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next . Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question Washington Department-of Wildlife or the Washington IDepartment of Fisheries? N(7 Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I '. Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next 1,,`,... Question (\KJ I F I IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) • Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? No: Next Question k ky Is the wetland documented as•Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt Yes:Category.I Significance? No: Next Question Na . ' Does the wetland contain individuals of State-Iisted Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes:Category II - plant species? Heritage) No: Next Question VU Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-Iisted or W D Wildlife Yes:Category-I • candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington - No: Next I Department of Wildlife? Question , 1 I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question . • Department of Fisheries? NO - Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented- W D Wildlife Yes: Category II ' by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question. \ Is the wetland documented as a Category H Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category H Significance? No: Next Question 0 Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category III ' Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Form 1 1 1 i R We k c€ °11 5) - Ct.1i-i-,„ 1941 WETLANDS RATING FthLD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: 6iAffiliation: v Date: -`-'9.00-5- Name of wetland (if known): .Na / A - WQd \i lk ,,.Government Jurisdiction of wetland: vIW 1-"`-' Location: 1/4 5: of 1/4 S: 7 W SEC: 21 TWNSHP: 29 IV RNGE: ___ ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map: NWI map: VAerial Photo: Y .Soils survey: V I Other: V Describe: .:71 .0101-' P / c` @ WdN i P p f itt J • 777 ; mho I WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE. IQ.1. High ()uality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer thisuestion ifyou have adequate information or experience q to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. Ila. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing,grading, Y=.:go to Q.3. • filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, . 1 Nrgo to lb. dredging, diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly decribe the changes and your I information source/s: N prig 'fit rv*e lb. Aro there populations of non-nativelants which are currentlypresent and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Y go to Q.3. Ipopulations and information source(s): N 4Y'Q, 4 •oto lc. Ilc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the waterquality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Y -go to Q3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of 0 Possible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,Iivestock use or dead fish etc. ategory I Briefly describe: _ 0-4-+ I I I • I Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native ' wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: - ' Does the wetland:. No to• go tQ.4. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; N Yes:go to 3a. -or•have a forested classr a g e ter than 1 acre; No Yes:go to 3b. -or,have characteristics of an estuarine system; °V Yes:go to.3c. -or,have eel grass, floating or non-floating kelp beds? a•. Yes:go to 3d. 3a. Peat Wetlands. 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover ' of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees >50'tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. 3b3. Is > 50% (areal cover)of the dominantlants in one or more. P e layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. No: Category I •1 IQ.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National I Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-1519 . Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. I3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. I or is the wetland< 1 acre? . Yes:go to 3c4.• I3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3 of the following 4 criteria- Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, I ditching, filling, cultivation,grazing or the presence of non-native plant. species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; I -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazedpasture,astur e,open water, shrub or forest; - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. f I3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II No: Category III IQ.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I I . g 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than 50% No: o to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I INo: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands \• 39 I4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 aide and, hydrologically isolated and. comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% Iareal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV 2 No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres `qQ Iand, hydrologically isolated, ,0p with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 es: Category IV I et,go to Q5. I I 111 I0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres >20.00 Yes=6 ■ Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10=19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-999 Yes=4 1or1-4.99 Yesolg Enter acreage of wetland here:)�3 I acres, and source: (V 0.1-0.99 Yes=2 C-.5) <0.1 Yes=1 ' I5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . Open Water. if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland area. Source: NO I d Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds> 10%of the open water'area or> 1/2 acre. I Emerarea.gent: if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland \N S'hYJ6 Ccv--- ,,,v,. 1 Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is 1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland area. Cie a'"& \- Forested: if area of forested is > 1/2 acre or> 1070 of.the total wetland area. IAdd the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify, and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. 1 Yes=1 l 2 Yes 6 e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent Sr 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 5 Yes=10 0 1 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not 3... Yes=2 have to name them. " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 / 3-4... Yes=2 3 I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4... Yes=3 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 tr species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 3-4... Yes=2 2 " >4... Yes=3 Forested 1-2... Yes=1 I I " 3-4... Yes=2 " >4... Yes=3 0 I I - . • I . 5d. Structural diversity. A . • • If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: -trees>50' tall � Yes 411 I • -trees 20'-49'tall Yes ii)-shrubs Yes 0 ; -herbaceous ground cover Yes til J/ I 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes s:.,y_i/ . is high,moderate,low or none? '1?..... .$;•:', • y44...',, i::,}.;; .,:}.. •a,• '•''• .:f}:,if :da`i' s •{} ' ::i. 4'lvCvy� k�...i C<:T}� .?: Yip r^�y... rue . a•}•{{: low '•,iii... t: �$$.:,.:v }. ,.,•:::: :::>;>:.;:: .„ ; $ to . High {,:{was ;: �x:Y >.: • • 3 • {� Moderatj ' ' ""''"" None=O .- 'ti.1i. lele moderate{ moderate •_, ♦ high '.' ♦ T 2 ) . . i5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below, circle features that apply,and score to right: i Is there evidence of current use by beavers? WOYes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? Na Yes=2 I Are raptor nest/s located within 300'7 '40 Yes=1 Are there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre? G 3 tQ Yes=1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10" in diameter? Yes=1. Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? No Yes=1 • Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? i' Yes=1 6I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) . WI)W QCT Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water:I to a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish;. .\VP. . Yes=5 or, to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes6) . or,is not connected to any stream? Yes=03. I I I • • • •I • 5h. Buffers. STEP 1 STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the %of each Multiply result(s) of step 1: buffer or land-use type (below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; by 3,.ifbuffer width is >100'. Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: right: roads, buildings or I parking lots: % x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: % C/ x1= x _ = ungrazed grassland or orchards: %O x 2= x _ = • open water or native grasslands: % 0 x 3= x = • forest or shrub: %)(11 x 4= 1 W x �/ = y Rd .n3: )20 Add Buffer total= 1-2_04) STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: buffer total 900-1200... Yes=4 600-899.. .. Yes=3 300-599. ... Yes=2 100-299.. .. Yes=1 5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other'habitat area? Yes -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide with low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=l -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or cultivated agricultural land? Yes=0 NOW: Add the scores circled(for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total . ... Total = 3j Is the Total greater than or equal to 22 points.. Yes: Category II No: Category III ) WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM I _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: sn Ferre Affiliation: 1w.Gyre Date: 0130-2C4C -V Ai en co Name of wetland (if known): j 1•t.+\J' IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: C..,1+.1 Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: C SEC: z) TWNSHP: 7-9 IVRNGE: 41 E:' ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map: V NWI map: V Aerial Photo: I"Soils survey: k .-T1 Other:V Describe: Ga 41., clA \ 7y e', N tq, c. EJ l i IWhen office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: J, IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA - CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) I Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-Iisted DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next I historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? - N IDoes the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or .W D Wildlife Yes: I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next by the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question m) I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next . Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the ' . W D Fisheries Question Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington' I Department of Fisheries? • N 0 I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question tto 1 1 IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) " Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? No: Next Question M I Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local"Govt. Yes:Category I Significance? No: Next Question x a I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-Iisted Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes: Category II plant species? • Heritage) No: Next Question 1 Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington • No: Next Department of Wildlife? Question Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question Department of Fisheries? ti 'V Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented" W D Wildlife Yes: Category II 11 by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? . . No: Next Question NG Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data F rm N •1 i- 1 I \O 00,-," ,.3 , W(XOcE ori 5) - Ct:•ce 1 qq 1 WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater Affiliation: y -Cite Date:1G :<N Name of wetland (if known): tt`fps� "H:/1 �►Vc Government Jurisdiction of wetland: Q:1 cl. liXen",'"eor 2 . Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: $ SEC: . TWNSHP: 2941/ RNGE: VA ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map: 1.---"' NWI map: Aerial Photo ,Soils survey: Other: V Describe: - A —a' '\... ' rt. �.,,(a WHEN THE FIELD DATAj FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE:ji..." 1 Q.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not ( find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to I questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. Ila. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography o hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing,grading, Y• :go to Q.3, filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer,or culverts,ditches, o:go to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly describe the changes and your Iinformation source/s: Nd lb. Are there populations of non-native plants which are currently present and 1 currently appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Y:,,:go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): .. ,o to lc. Ilc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the water quality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts •s:go to Q.3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of 0 ossible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,livestock use or dead fish etc. gory I Briefly describe: I --_-- -- - ---------- I i . 3 . I / Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native I wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: - No to all: Does the wetland: goto Q.4. .. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; ii) Yes:go to 3a. I -or have a forested class greater than 1 acre; Yea- Yes:go 3b. ' 1 -orhave characteristics of an estuarine system; No G Yes:go to.3c. -or•have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds' WO O. .. Yes:go to 3d. I3a. Peat Wetlands. 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I INo: go.to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. I3b1. Is the average age of dominant tree,in the forested wetland >80 y ars? Yes: Category I 304* (pyo No: go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80II years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. ilD go to Q.5. 3b3. Is> 50% (areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. INo: Category I 1 I I ) Q.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30451? Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I . or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland< 1 acre? . Yes:go to 3c4. 3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3 of the following 4 criteria- Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazed gr pasture,open water, shrub or forest; 111 - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. 3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II g rY No: Category III IQ.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I I g 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s)present with greater than 50% No: o to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands 4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre and, hydrologically isolated and. comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres and, hydrologically isolated,. with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Category IV No:go to Q5. I I I } 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres II >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: S�G 5-9.99 Yes . l...).% 07,c ( 1-4.99 Yes=3 Enter acreage of wetland here: acres, and source: I- 0.1-0.99 Yes=2 <0.1 Yes=1 ' I5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: NerfNiftaen Water: if the area of open ater is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland - /- area. Source: IAquatic Beds: peidarea of aquatic beds> 10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. I `/,Emergent if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre a> 10%of the total wetland area. L-.Grp, g . Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland 1 area. lyaj)...„Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland area. IAdd the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify, and #of lasses then score according to the columns at right. 1 Yes=1 2 Yes=3 e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent k 3 Yes=5 II scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 5 Yes=10 I ICI 5c. Plant species diversity. #of / Class species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes&l the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not ." 3... Yes=2 have to name them. " >3... Yes=3 1 Score in column at far right Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 " 3-4... Yes= I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4... Ye3 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 I " 3-4... Yes=2 >4... Yes4 • Forested 1-2... Yes=1 " 3-4... Yes=2 " >4... Ye -3 to I ) • I I I i • • I . 5d. Structural diversity. If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: c- -trees>50' tall Yes=1 • I • -trees 20'-49' tall Yes 2 . -shrubs • Yes -herbaceous ground cover Yes 6-;,1-‘\` 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes r is high,moderate,low or none? . I - . . { .. .\ 4;;2 'a{ti",C,�'hN.+, '- \wt;"a„CCdthw • f#F;:.{t{•�{• k2+c %tie ii. .... • ._'CyY . w q»,.#yy''.y:.4�'a�4•.•: ,''4,{fV?",?12?% ..? r.%:.. •i•••4v 4� ,•2 S •: .• .:;{;;•'•y?{%: • 4 vi+"w`,•sF•:::} ..,2 r :.2?$; '. •'e} }{2'' :1 .{2?:'}w. A;,:�L,'i:: KS'r •tiv2 l's: .< S:?T{ •.:;•,+ .�k+.,{off I 4: : .:\ ;i>;{ ia3 .;< IOW +';::'{•}:.. •:'{�`.,x}?;;S' 10 .$;'y I1CHle 3y {; •t X,{ ;,;}.e,:•'•'• .SY.. .`,�,N.°lam•••}.'`. .{, r.i £:... ;fi nvt.::•:, High=3 Moderate=2 1 },x4:: v45.;: 5 « ;: c:>. - • , 3"` yti; Low=1 {.: . None— 0: {..:•:.w;:$•::::* / / / / I / I /::/ / / moderate` moderate •\ \ •\ \ \ \ 1''''i . . 1 5f. Habitat features. i Answer questions below, circle features that apply,and score to right: • IIs there evidence of current use by beavers? Y44- Yes Is a heron rookery located within 300'? Y P. Yes=c Are raptor nest/s located within 300'? �/,,,,1 Q Yes=1 Are there at least 3 standing dead trees (snags)per acre? Ye —1 \ Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter? V-4-4.- Ye . Il _. Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? NO Yes=1 Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yes6/7; r5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) ., Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: I to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish;. . . . Yes= or• to a seasonal stream without fish;... .. . .... . .. , . Ye . or,is not connected to any stream? Yes=O r I I4 I • 1 . • i „ I ) 5h. Buffers. I ;STEP 1 ,STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s) of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1, if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; I by 3,.if buffer width is >100'. Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or III parking lots: % x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: %Q x 1= x _ _ ungrazed grassland or orchards: %C) x 2= x _ _ 0 open water or native grasslands: %x 3= x _ = 0 1 forest or shrub: %c7° x 4= x 1 "C�/ 1914 }v Add Buffer total= -- e0 ISTEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total 900-1200... Yes=4 I 600-899. . .. Yes=3 300-599.. .. Yes=2 100-299.. .. Yes 5i. Connection to other habitat areas: I -Is there a riparian corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> I • 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes 0 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or Ia significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=l -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=0 Is NOW: Add the scores circled(for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total . 1•4.1...1 = 1.IC 1 IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 pointsCategory No: Category III. I , IWA l w,df C, t WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM f _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • Name of Rater: ) Affiliation: \t .` ejfi _ Date: XC IName of wetland (if known): We L Government Jurisdiction of wetland: C1 i Location: 4 SW �) 9/N ac . / S: of 1/4 S: SEC: TWNSHP: RNGE: I SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) IV Site visit: 1.--'USGS Topo Map: NWI-map: 1/ Aerial Photo: Soils survey: Other: V. Describe: L\ < W ., i W VP- _./ Ce j i • When office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: _ w IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA - CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest • circle the category in"CATEGORY" column. qualifies) I Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-Iisted DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next I historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? No IDoes the wetland e nd contain documented habitats for State-listed or .W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next Iby the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question N I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally Iisted or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question IWashington DepartmentofWildlife or the Washington Department of Fisheries? N I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? - No: Next Question Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local-Govt. Yes:Category I Significance? No: Next Question Nd I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes:Category II plant species? Heritage) No: Next Question Does the-wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington No: Next Department of Wildlife? Question i\b Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question - Department of Fisheries? 9 S R� Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented- W D Wildlife Yes: Category II by Washington Department of WildIife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question - IV G • I Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes:Category II Significance? No: Next 1 Question No Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category III Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Fo i 1 (� t I 1 I wP ►G WaocE ow-5 7 - Gtr 1q q1 WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: JMKe.rf Affiliation: Lir - Co& Date: %E-- IName of wetland (if known): `N r4 C — Watlf PA1c Government Jurisdiction of wetland: i;lly ` t W 21 Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: SEC: . TWNSHP:"' RNGE: CA E ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) V Site visit: USGS Topo Map: t/ i.,map: y Aerial Photo: ,Soils survey: y IOther: V Describe: c7frrt/ Otill 94 Viot,tiAi I WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE IIQ.1. High Quality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. I Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. I la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing, grading, Yes:goQ.3, filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer,or culverts,ditches, No:go to TG- dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly describe the changes and your I information source/s: / s -, -414- 2V,,c-cl5c) 1 lb. Are thei-e populations of non-nativelants which are currently present and P currently appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes:go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): — No:go to lc. 111 lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the water quality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of No:Possible Iwastes, oily sheens,extreme eutrophic conditions,Iivestock use or dead fish etc. Category I Briefly describe: I _ / 1 •/ I , I I IQ.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. . Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: No to .11- Does the wetland: go t. . -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; Yes:go to 3a. -or.have a forested class greater than 1 acre; U Yes:go to 3b. -or,have characteristics of an estuarine system; lvt Yes:go to 3c. -or•have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? Yes:go to 3d. 3a. Peat Wetlands. 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I ' No: go_to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees >50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. I . . No:go to Q.5. 3b3. Is> 50% (areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more.layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs)invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. No: Category I • • i I ) 1 , I IQ.3c. Estuarine wetlands. f 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National t onal Wildlife Refuge, National Park, EstuaryReserve;Natural Area I to Preserve,State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-1519 Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. 1 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I • or is the wetland I-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland< 1 acre? Yes:g oto 3c4. I3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria. Yes: Category I No: Category Il -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, I ditching, filling,cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; I -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazedpasture,open water, pe shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. ( 1 3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II g �' No: Category III I Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I g 2. ' 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s)present with greater than 50% No:go to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I g rY I No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands \ie°1 1114.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre and. 00,,,.- . ,t hydrologically isolated and, : \vQ comprised of one vegetated class g that is dominated (> 80% I areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Y : Category IV 140 (goto4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres I and, hydrologically isolated with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Cate ••.. N I No:got• Q5. I I I 1 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter da requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area (i C1+ acres V / C vvet-- . >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the nea 'ght column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 r C..,1 acreage of wetland here: 1 acres, and source: J� C0.1-0.992 Yes T <0.1 Yes=1 ' ( 1' 5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . I 'b Open Water. if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland area. Source: i ^\ Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds>10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. mergent: if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland I area. ypt.Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or> 10% of the total wetland Ii area. ,(° ti) •4 IN.Pi 3 Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. IAdd the number of wetland classes, above, that qualify,and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. ,11� Yes= Ye I e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent & 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 5 Yes=10 GO 1 5c. Plants species diversity. p #of Class species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1,i the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not 3... Yes=2 0 have to name them. >3... Yes=3'`""" IScore in column at far right: Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 0 " I/ ! G. Yes=2 e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an / >4... Yes=3 I emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 " (`;) 3-4... Yes() I `:'J >4... Yes=3 il(1-I ,,,Forested 1-2... Yes=1 2d " 3-4... Yes=2 0 " >4... Yes=3 1 • I . 5d. Structural diversity. . If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: -trees>50' tall Yes=1 ' • -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1 -shrubs Yes= • herbaceous ground cover Yes=1 � . I5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes �1V� is high,moderate,low or none? I . 46:w4,.. ....:.,,s t.r.... ..:04.,:mo 2 ytr`*."... ,nYciiii s,� .+fig}{ s.':-...- 5 t: r .x, : :i,:-• low < to } •i } ;4` .<, : . ,'.. ...:•"" High=3 Moderate=2 «u::<:' - Low=1 ` .+ .;::wv y:::M> J _ - „• None=O :;}'< ..A '''''te''''',''" .... __ ... / / :•,•::f':,::�i::::':.4:i<:.'•<h:'?:: / I / J J / / IJ J moderate moderate \'\' ' ' high ',:":14"81111.'' \, 0 . .\ 1 5f. Habitat features. . Answe.�r questions below,circle features that apply,and score to right�� I Is there evidence of current use by beavers? j Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? Yes=2 Are raptor nest/s located within 300'7 Yes=1 I • Are there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre? N Yes=1 1,,,....9) Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter? NQ Yes=1. 111Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? . Np Yes=1 Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? C) Yes=1 , I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: I to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 or• to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes=3 or,is not connected to any stream, Yes=0 3 I I I •I I • 5h. Buffers. $TEP 1 •,STEP 2 I Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the %of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; 1 by 3,.ifbuffer width is >100'. Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or ' parking lots: % x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: % 0 x 1= x _ =I ungrazed grassland or orchards: %0x2= x _ _ _ open water or native grasslands: %0 x 3= x _ = Iforest or shrub: %/aZdx 4= / x '' = P . • Add Buffer total=_ . ISTEP 3. Score points according to table at right I I001LW.,. Yes=4 1 600-899. . .. Yes=3 300-599. . .. Yes=2 100-299. . .. Yes=1 8 5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> I - 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes=5 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or Ia significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=0 (4 II NOW: Add the scores circled (for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total .... Total = 71 IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points Yes: Category No: Catego III Ij '1,) ODS, 9)- 511- C)c- -d - )991 WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM I _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: . . Name of Rater: ')t ' Affiliation: �.�4 y -Gyre Date: /•-Cd 1 Name of wetland (if known): VV 4A 46 UJ Ht.')k • Government Jurisdiction of wetland: Cit qt e`�. - ' Location: 1/4of 2 2 Cl - / S: 1/4 S: N W SEC: 6 TWNSHP: RNGE: SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map: f NWI map: Aerial Photo:1 r- Soils survey: - IOther:r1/ . Describe: pc./ oolk. / 1Ahr' /p( ` t 'i Cr i i(( 1 IWhen office and/or field data-forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: 1-7.--)41.- IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in "CATEGORY" column. qualifies) I . Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next I historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? NO 1 . Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-Iisted or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next I by the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question N 1, I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally Iisted or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next . Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington Department of Fisheries? NG I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next r,1 Question IN I WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) ' Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory birds? • No: Next Question Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local"Govt. Yes:Category I Significance? No: Next IQuestion I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes:Category II ' plant species? Heritage) No: Next Question Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-Iisted or W D Wildlife Yes:Category'II candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington No: Next Department of Wildlife? . Question N I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes:Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question Department of Fisheries? N y • • Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented' W D Wildlife Yes: Category II by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question, 1, • IIs the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? No: Next 1 Question • rJ� Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III I Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Form I . I I I I i), ,,- , l ' Nit WO oc• (I1 5) GtA--6.- - 1 91 1 ■ WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater t Affiliation: G"1'1 4 gw. car Date: I Name of wetland (if known): WeitNel 1) --\4421 Wit- _ IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: rit V(, 434C Location: 1/4 5: of 1/4 S: 1A)SEC: • 2 t� l / N �TWNSHP. y RNGE: ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) V Site visit: V USGS Topo Map: NWI map: t.,1Aerial Photo: 1/ Soils survey: y IOther: IV Describe: CIPPIINAfs-., Vsf J•� e ' `-ci , f i evii - I WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE: I Q.1. High Quality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this uestion ifhave adequate information or experience youeq to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or I hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing,grading, go to Q.3, filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, - "go:go to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the we land. Brief describe the changs andteyour I information source/s: — ,-�qt-r l ---- - LN4 4 -_-- Ilb. Are theme populations of non-native plants which are currently present and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes:go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): No:go to lc. 111 lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the water quality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3, entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of No: Possible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,livestock use or dead fish etc. Category I Briefly describe: I I I I • Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: • 1 No to . Does the wetland: j go t. -have ata least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; 1`tD Yes:go to 3a. I -or,have a forested classgreater No than 1 acre; Yes:go to 3b. I -or,have characteristics of an estuarine system; ` it/ Yes:go to 3c. -or•have eel grass, floating or non-floating kelp beds' ND ... Yes:go to 3d. r3a. Peat Wetlands. I . 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have < 80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: CategoryI ' No:go to 3b2. • I 3b2. Is the average age of dominant ant trees in the forested wetland - g 50 80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. I No:go to Q.5. 3b3. Is > 50%(areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. i No: Category I I 1 ) II Qac. Estuarine wetlands. f 3c1. Is the wetland Iisted as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National I Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-15.1 Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. 1 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres;• Yes: Category I . or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. I or is the wetland < 1 acre? Yes:go to 3c4. I3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3 of the following 4 criteria- Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant ' species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of un grazed pasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. ( I 3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II g �' No: Category III IQ.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. ' 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I g 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than 50% No: o to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I I No: Category II �J Q.4. Category IV wetlands \,re& 4.1. Is the wetland: less than I acre and. ;424) hydrologically isolated and. comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% I areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Y s: Category IV 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres IS"' oto 4.2. and, hydrologically isolated, G with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 •s: Category IV I No:..o to Q5. I I I0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. • Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres ' >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10.19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 ' . w 01 - 1-4.99 • Yes=3 Enter acreage of wetland here: acres, and source: Vt .1-0.99 Yes=2 <0. Yes=1 'cl,) 5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . I Open Water: if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland area. Source: U Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds>10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. I Nita, Emergent if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland 7 area. pp Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or> 10% of the total wetland area. IY. u Forested: if area of forested class is> 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. IAdd the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify, and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. 1 Yes=1 a ss 2 Yes e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent & 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 5 Yes=10 a-, I 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class. species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b.above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not 3... Yes=2 C) have to name them. . " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right: Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 " 3-4... Yes=2 3 e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4 . Yes=3 I emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 10 Yes() 2., 3-4_:. Yes=2 q.) I >4... Yes=3 Forested 1-2... Yes=1 I " 3-4— Yes=2 0 >4... Yes=3 • 1 1 I , I . 5d. Structural diversity. If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: -trees>50' tall Yes=1 U -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1 -shrubs Yes=1 • -herbaceous ground cover Yes=1 0 , ' • 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? I . �;ry'1tiil�y'•v.; ti�•Y.•. is • .? ++ • .A,.. } s: pit..:,. ,��:V,,.'A;^}.. q. y'4, { .' . DOM '"''a . :,•:;`.r...-4:i::•::, low •..,�' ;,4 to ""' :....... High=3 Mod erate=2 .:;. ; ,..«.:.- • - Low=1 .k:::. .' - - -' %V None=O U : .. z::.:....: moderate °%< °`'"' moderate high ' I5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below,circle features that apply,and score to right • (. IIs there evidence of current use by beavers? NO Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? NG . Yes=2 0 Are raptor nest/s located within 300'7 Np Yes=1 Are there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre? Yes=1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter'? Yes=1. U I _ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? Yes=1 Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yes=1 G I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) . . Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: to•a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 or•to a seasonal stream without fish; NYes=3 or is not connected to any stream? �2 • Yes=0 INo- vat+n 0 I . I I . • I • I ) 5h. Buffers. STEP 1 STEP 2 I Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s) of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; I by 3,.if buffer width is >100,. Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: I right: roads, buildings or ' parking lots: Tpx 0= 0 (3 T c lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: % C)x 1= x _ =I _ ungrazed grassland or orchards: %Qx 2= x _ _ open water or native grasslands: %°x 3= x = I forest or shrub: % x 4= I w x _ = 7(;ti • .. . Add Buffer total=_ . I . STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total ) 900-1200... Yes=4 I . 600-899. . .. Yes=3 300-599.... Yes 2' 100-299. ... Yes=1 --'\, 5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor>I - 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes ) -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide with low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or I a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or S • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=O ..77).,„,. • NOW: Add the scores circled (for Q.5a.-QSi above) to get a Total .... Total =W I Is the Total greater than or equal to 22 points.._ : Category II No: ategory III- 1 , Ii°Nv' E . -ivu A Oce c ..SI- Ocie )991 1 WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: c.....)74eltle Affiliation: Vii?n Date: ++,ZS Name of wetland (if known): L, :O IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: l't .or 3tc.ria(11,1%J • - Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: NW SEC: 26TWNSHP. 'V RNGE:O ) . SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map: NWI-map: y Aerial Photo: Soils survey: 1 Other: �. Describe: 1 t" '1taiti J ) \tr 'lige- PAN.) CA(4 • I When office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE:_ ,jil IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) 1 Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I I . T neatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? h t o Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next by the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question ;00 I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next . Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question I Washington Department-of Wildlife or the Washington Department of Fisheries? I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question WO I 1 • WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM-(CONTINUED) • • Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? • No: Next Question n�� I . Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local"Govt. Yes:Category.I Significance? No: Next Question NO I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes: Category II . . plant species? . Heritage) No: Next •Question i,,_; Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes: CategorylI candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington • No: Next I Department of Wildlife? . Question npV • I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes:Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question . • 1 Department of Fisheries? SO• Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented- W D Wildlife Yes: Category II I by Washington Department of WildIife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question m - • Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? No: Next IQuestion • ^6 Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III I Significance? No:Go to • Wetlands Rating Field Data Form I I , - . . . 1 I I . wao� �n 57 C Icrai 111 . WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: 37.14€51 Affiliation: ((---e;A`t/ 44) Date: D .,,,-,e2:Cf IName of wetland (if known): `f Ail . C (_ ‘44421 i4,11isj IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: C�. a 1 r✓ai , Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: 1 v w SEC: .2 TWNSHP: 29& RNGE: OI L ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map: f/ NWI map: Aerial Photo: v Soils survey: V I Other 1/ Describe: _ pl", h i b A, • it , I WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS C OMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE: IQ.1. High Quality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO,contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. I la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing,grading, Yes:go to Q.3, filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer,or culverts,ditches, . No: o to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly describe` the c{ianges and your I information source/s: •4 -------- yuot h Pte_ --. 1 lb. Are there populations of non-nativelants which are currently YPresent and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes:go to Q.3. ipopulations and information source(s): lo'-- -'---M go to lc. Ilc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the waterquality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3.' entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of o: ossible Iwastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,livestock use or dead fish etc. . egory I Briefly describe: _ 1 I . IQ.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities • The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. I Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: - IDoes the wetland:. • No to al go . Q.4. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; .1\10 Yes:go to 3a. I -or,have a forested classgreater . ND Yes:go to 3b. r r`� -or•have characteristics of an estuarine system; C Yes:go to.3c. -or•have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? NO Yes:go to 3d. I3a. Peat Wetlands. . 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have<25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. I Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. - I3b1. Is the average age of dominant tree in the forested wetland >80 years Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. 3b2. Is,the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is I the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. I . 3b3. Is > 50%(areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more.layers young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. rNo: Category I • I . •Iii I r ) I 1 Q.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park,National I Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park,or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-1519 Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. I3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes:Category I • or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland< I acre? . Yes:go to 3c4. I3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria. Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, I ditching, filling,cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant. species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; I i -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazed grazepasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. i I3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II g ry No: Category III Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I I • No:go to 3d2. 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than 50% macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I . No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands /41". Ni I 4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre and, O hydrologically isolated and. comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV ‘i414- No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres ('— ND I and, hydrologically isolated, with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 ZailCategory NI I I 1 ' 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres >20.00 Yes=6 • Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10=19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 +�. 1-4-.9999 499 Yes=3 Enter acreage of wetland here: /acres, and source: c/in -11 0.99 Yes=2 I <0.1 Yes=1 d . 5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify. 111 Open Water if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland . - area. Source: Aq" q open Beds: if the area of aquatic beds>10%of the o n water area or> 1/2 acre. Emergent if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland I + area. Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland area. ' ! Forested: if area of forested classi > c 0 s 1/2 acre or 10%of the total wetland area. 111 v Add the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify,and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. Yes=1 b Yes=3 . I . . e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent & 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 5 Yes=10C3) 1 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class species I I For all wetland classes (at right)that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not " " 3... Yes=2 0 have to name them. . " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right: Emergent - .. Yes=1 0 " Yes=2 e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4... Yes=3. emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 " � Yes=2 (1) Yes-3 Forested 1-2.. Yes=1 I " 3-4... Yes=2 " >4... Yes=3 I I I I . 5d. Structural diversity. f If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: • -trees>50'tall Yes=1 I -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1 -shrubs Yes=1 ' 0 -herbaceous ground cover Yes=1 I5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? i\dell- C10041"" s, h ; .:; 41W J.. { •; '�{::5 -j '•'y.:}?;...,A;:::.• ..e �W Ohl ......fto, iO �• , ..-. ...i.:;„:............;:` wmig... ` . High=3 Moderate=2 .:•r:s:.K«� .. urs>: - Low=1 >:: :. ,.i ,',.. - :::: None=O SAF}%.,;y; / / / / I / / / / / / moderate moderate high \ \ \ /' 1 t . I5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below,circle features that apply,and score to right: (I .. Is there evidence of current use by beavers? N c, Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? N1/ Yes=2 t IAre raptor nest/s located within 300'? � Yes=1 Are there at least 3 standingdead trees (snags)per acre? Yes=1 g Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter? NAV Yes=1. I _ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)' . y• / Yes=1 Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yes=1 I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) , Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: �,1V `C III to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 or• to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes=3 . or,is not connected to any stream? Yes=0 S,..) I I . 1 •I • • I ) 5h. Buffers. • I ,STEP 1 •STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; . by 3,.if buffer width is >100'. Then multiply the%/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to. Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or parking lots: %L x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: %a x 1= x _ = _ I ungrazed grassland or P� — = orchards: %V x 2= x open water or �^y native grasslands: % 1!x 3= x = • Iforest or shrub: % x 4= x3. _ f • Add Buffer total= ISTEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total _ I - 900-1200... Yes14 I 600-899.... Yes=3 300-599.... Yes=2 100-299.... Yes=1 I5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> I • 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yee -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=l -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=0 �' I • 24 NOW: Add the scores circled(for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total .... Total = ) IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points. . Yes: Category No: Catego III I t i F • . \P%) Aft 9)-51. Oci )991 WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: }kAffiliation: Date: Dle..seZ1 IName of wetland (if known): .w d' F cl wlfatil s.H.:116 Government Jurisdiction of wetland: ly.G +D't``/ - N vv Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: N E SEC: AV TWNSHP: 2 Y RNCE: 01 ' : ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map i+'' NWI-map: io 'Aerial Photo: L Soils survey: L' . Other: V Describe: 1 i Yv M 1 __ANI (4(4K i 064)•I When office and/or field data.forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA - CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest • circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) i • • • Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next I historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question . or Extirpated from Washington? N 0 • I . Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or .W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next by the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington IDepartment of Fisheries? ITs the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next , ` Question 01 t I "'ft° IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory birds? - No: Next Question I Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category.I I Significance? No: Next Question �� I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes:Category II - plant species? - Heritage) No: Next Question . Ni) \y Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes: Category-II I candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington No: Next Department of Wildlife? Question • I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question IDepartment of Fisheries? 0* 01?..cef Vei- _ Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented- W D Wildlife Yes: Category II III by Washington Department of WildIife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question • Nk7ek cji,c-eve-cl- ho 111 . Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? No: Next Question • \)0 I Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Form I Itis I WcoocE °II 5) - Ct4-c\>„ r q 1 (k . . WETLANDS RATING HELD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: \"f! ' Affiliation: "�1 f"V' Date: OW....:01CONC IName of wetland (if known): NO@ F — /1 kfb is I Government Jurisdiction of wetland: C cf \31,t4-(1.' ot4Pv‘., - Location: 1/4 S; , 2 Z of 1/4 S: he SEC: TWNSHP: /V RNGE: 0 ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map: ✓ NWI map: Y Aerial Photo: `Soils survey: IOther: // Describe: [Rt\,nW k At Aka '4 IWHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE.:i.., 111 Q.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not Ifind someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO,contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. Ila. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing, grading, oto Q.3. filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, No: to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the w tland. Briefly akescribe the changes and your Iinformation source/s: -- LC ' lb. Are there populations of non-native plants which are currently present and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes:go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): No: o to lc. Ilc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the waterquality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of 1o: 'ossible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,livestock use or dead fish etc. . egory I Briefly describe: I I . : . , IQ.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. I Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: I Does the wetland: • No to go o Q.4. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; Nib .. Yes:go to 3a. I -or,have a forested classeater than n 1 acre; NO Yes:go to 3b. I. - uor•have characteristics of an estuarine system; . .. Yes:go to 3c. -or have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? NU Yes:go to 3d. I3a. Peat Wetlands. I 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have<25% areal cover of any combination of species from the Iist of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go to Q.4. I Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. I3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is I the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees >50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. I. 3b3. Is > 50% (areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more ore layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. Yes:go to Q.5. INo: Category I I I 1 ) I III tQ.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 36. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National I Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-15.1? Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. t3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I. . or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. I or is the wetland< 1 acre? Yes:go to 3c4.• I3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria- Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, I ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazed pasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. I3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II No: Category III 1 Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I g 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than 50% No: o to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I I No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands n1 I4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre's d. hydrologically isolated and. comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (> 80% I areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category N No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acre - I and, hydrologically isolated, with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Category N I ...Sto Q5. I I I F I ' 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores . that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres I >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: ttK, rt t1 O1 ` 5-9.99 Yes=4 1e4.' i '-1 4.99 • Yes I Enter acreage of wetland here: !. acres, and source: Yes=10.1-0.99 Yes= I <0.11/4_ � 5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qu fy: . Open Water. if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland - • I\IV area. Source: 111 Or) Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds>10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. Emergent: if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland area. L c1^ s- "T ' IScrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or> 10% of the total wetland ' \I area. te4 Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. IAdd the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify,and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. I Yes=1 I Yes=3 e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent Sr L..y 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 I5 Yes=10 CD 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class. species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not ." 3... Yes=2 0 have to name them. >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right: Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 " 3-4... Yes=2 Ni }° I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4... Yes=3 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1 . Yes=1 " 3-4... Yes=2 del 1 " >4... Yes=3 Forested 1-2... Yes=1 I " 3-4... Yes 2` ,D . >4... Yes=3 .) I I5d. Structural diversity. ( If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the ' following. -trees>50' tall Yes PIP -trees 20'-49'tall Yes shrubs Yes 13, ,-....) . • -herbaceous ground cover Yes q � I . . 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? a k{( ::'j? S h}" ,.. ..0kt f� :ui:3 nor k. IOW `":�, �,'c 10 •:� ;i Mod ate=2 I }: ss } • ;,:eft"}:} - >> ,.:. :>:: ;, «w _ Low 1 ,'`/'<;':e : •{:{ ;h><p :•�' V- None= Mow y 111 19.6MINES:. • • • moderate `` moderate '\ ' ' high ' '\'\ \ /°) p . ' 5f. Habitat features. ._.__ Answer questions below, circle features that apply,and score to right: l Is there evidence of current use by beavers? C) Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? Yes=2 Are raptor nest/s located within 300'? isi 0.... Yes=1 i . Are there at least 3 standing dead trees (snags)per acre? Yes=1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter*, Yes=1. ( I • _ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? _ .,, ' • Yes=1 Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Ye . lgo:67.)•\. I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) ' ' Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: I to•a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish;.,._1. . . . Yes=5 or•to a seasonal stream without fish;.. '(15r`. Yes 3' . or•is not connected to any stream? Yes= I • I • I (.. • I . • I5h. Buffers. • I STEP 1 .,STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; I by 3,.if buffer width is >100'. Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or I parking lots: %_x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or • annual crops: % 0 x 1= x _ =I _ ungrazed grassland or orchards: %Qx 2= x _ = _ open water or native grasslands: % Ox 3= x _ _ _ . I forest or shrub: %1F.�c 4= ChM x 3 = 110.) . • Add Buffer total= I STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total 900-1200... Yes/ I 600-899.... Yes= 300-599.... Yes=2 100-299.... Yes=1 V 1 5i. Connection to other habitat areas: T .,-I -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> ..,-- I - 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or Ia significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=0 1 • NOW: Add the scores circled(for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total • .... Total = -2-7 IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points Yes: Category II No: Category III I ) V) AoC 9)-SI- Ocie )99E WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM I _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: - Name of Rater: t)�1IC j '. Affiliation: 1%y�4i `V.C4 I Date: I • Name of wetland " (if known): ilG IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: c` .G� �^� Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: WV) SEC: TWN HP:2/ N RN : O) / s GE OUR(-PSOURCPS OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) - C 2•S ISite visit: USGS Topo-Map: NW,^,I''- nap: Aerial Photo: L.---- Soils survey: Other: �escribe: ! �V c -ON?) (6 4, meg. ......._..... I When office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA - CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? - N2 i • Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or -W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next Iby the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or • & No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question Washington Department-of Wildlife or the Washington IDepartment of Fisheries? I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next n) NI Question (/ I IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM.(CONTINUED) Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I v national significance for migratory.birds? - No: Next ' Question to Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category I Significance? No: Next - IQuestion I . Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes:Category II - . plant species? Heritage) No: Next 'Question - Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-Iisted or W D Wildlife Yes:CategorylI candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington - No: Next Department of Wildlife? Question RR � 1�7 I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or ' W D Wildlife Yes: Category U Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question - IIDepartment of Fisheries? Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented- W D Wildlife Yes: Category II I by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question_ • • I Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? No: Next IQuestion Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III I Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Fore I . I •111- I i Wei-1N G W0.0cE 0)1,-5) - Gt 1c ci i ( I WETLANDS RATING HELD DATA FORM • I BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: lloin c� Ver'f Affiliations Iiv�Cy�N,�(f Date: �� Name of wetland (if known): lei G �w l) Government Jurisdiction of wetland: tit 1 ItrAm04f , I Location: 1/4 S: - of 1/4 S• NW SEC: A TWNSHP: oZ N RvcE: 01E, I : :SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map: NWI map:4..------ Aerial Photo: �. Soils survey: Other: 1-/Describe: ) e- IWHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE:5, . IQ.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or Ihydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing,grading, Yes:go to Q.3. filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, ( :4:go to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly describe the changes and your information source/s: • I lb. Are there populations of non-native plants which are currently present and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes:go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): .Jgo to lc. 111 lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the waterquality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts go to Q.3.' entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of N Possible wastes, oily sheens,extreme eutrophic conditions,livestock use or dead fish etc. tegory I I Briefly describe: 1 ./I G • Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: • No to all: Does the wetland:. go to Q.4. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; Yes:go to 3a. -o •have a forested classgreater than 1 acre; NC- Yes:go to 3b. �. -or,have characteristics of an estuarine system; Yes:go to.3c. -or have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? VC) Yes:go to 3d. I3a. Peat Wetlands. 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. • I • 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. ' . 3b3. Is > 50%(areal cover)of the dominantlants in one or more. P layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. No: Category I I I S Q.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park,National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-15.19 . Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres;• Yes: Category I. or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland< 1 acre? . Yes:go to 3c4. 3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria- Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, ditching, filling,cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant. species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of unpasture,open grazed pe water, shrub or forest; - has at least 3 of the followingfeatures: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. 3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II g rY No: Category III Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I ' 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s)present with greater than 50% No:go to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I . No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands 9y `'C41 4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre and, T hydrologically isolated and • comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% 1 areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV No:go to 4.2. • 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres andhydrologically isolated, A)b • with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Cat -o N No:go t. Q5. 1 1 I • } I 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. • Circle scores . that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres i >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 R 1-4.99 • Yes=3 Enter acreage of wetland here:' 7acres, and source: S -0.99 Yes=2 <0.1 Yes=1 ' 09 5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . II Open Water. if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland area. Source: ii JA uatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds>10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. • q q P I \) Emergent: if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. o Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or> 10% of the total wetland • I `� area. 04- / Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or'>10%o the total wetland area. IAdd, the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify, and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. 1 Yes=1 QYes=3 . I e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent & 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 3 5 Yes=10 5c. Plant species diversity. #of P h' Class. species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the number.of different plant species you can find. You do not .,, 3... Yes=2 L have to name them. . " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 Yes=2 e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4... Yes=3 I emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 • species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 • " 3-4... Yes=2 . " > >. Yes=3 �,'/ Forested 1-2.. Yes=1 V ' " 3-4_ Yes=2 N d' >4... Yes=3• , • I I , • • I . 5d. Structural diversity. If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: • -trees>50' tall Yes=1 I -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1 -shrubs Yes=1 `9 • • -herbaceous ground cover Yes=1 . ' • 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? I nom e •' '" IOW �y9PT�}"i�'" 1 E <: v ' ::' High=3 Moderate=2 • :� T x:: - Low=1 :.:: .>: ::, , „•.;;: y :.• Non •:?a •'w%+ fiY• :.'$`Fy';pr .apT '.s.:4 >a' ♦ ♦ t moderate <.:Tr,>TT:. ? moderate • high (::: . . II5f. Habitat features. • • Answer questions below,circle features that apply,and score to right • I Is there evidence of current use by beavers? NP . Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? IV Yes=2 (' Are raptor nest/s located within 300'? 1t Yes=1 IAre there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre? N.) Yes=1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter? t Yes=1 LV . I _ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? ND Yes=1 • Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Fv C) Yes=1 . 1 5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: I to•a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes= orto a seasonal stream without fish; Yes 3 7.2). or,is not connected to any stream? Yes= I • • 1 - • I ) 5h. Buffers. • I STEP 1 STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; Then multiply'the %/s by the factor(s) by 3,.ifbuffer width is >100'. below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or I parking lots: % 0 x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: % 0 x 1= x _ = _ ungrazed grassland or I orchards: %0 x 2= x _ = open water or native grasslands: %0 x 3= x _ = _ Iforest or shrub: %� x 4= �y�J x 3 = / 2-C4N Add Buffer total= STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total I 900-1200... Yes4 I600-899. . .. Yes=3 300-599. ... Yes=2 (:) 100-299. . .. Yes=1 1 5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> I • 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yell -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or Ia significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=0 6....). NOW: Add the scores circled(for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total .... Total = 21_ IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points... Yes: Category No: Categ III- I , • • 1,,A1 A 0 ce. c p. 51. c )9 9 I . 1 WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: .. . Name of Rater: °"`K t� ' Affiliation:. 1ci A/C01 Date: IName of wetland (if known): . tN f1A.." H - wail. kJil)s . IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: C_ 6 (2k.r+e4 fe. Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: SW SEC oft TWNSHP: 29N RNGE:C),,,.., SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map:'_ NWI map: �''Aerial Photo: L._ Soils survey: IOther: 1...7 Describe: 1 'PO ?) N 1N Aot._�'✓! Ji IWhen office and/or field data-forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: • I ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA - CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) 1 • Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question . or Extirpated from Washington? G. I . • t\i . Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or .W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next I by the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question Nc I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally Iisted or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question IWashington Department-of Wildlife or the Washington Department of Fisheries? NG I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next yd�) Question I VV 1 . IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) . ' Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W I) Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? - No: Next - Question 1 v„i 1 . Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local"Govt. Yes:Category.I Significance? No: Next IQuestion I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes:Category U ' . plant species? Heritage) No: Next Question • I Np Does the"wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes: Category-II candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington - No: Next I - Department of Wildlife? Question b.i v . I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes:Category U Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by - & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question - IIDepartment of Fisheries? NL Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented- W D Wildlife Yes: Category ll I by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question • • " Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? . • No: Next Question V VI Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III ISignificance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Form I Nu I . 1- 1 wo,ocE °II 5 7 Gt lora) WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: , `— ' �' � 10 Name of Rater: ��. � Affiliation: Date: ' Name of wetland (if known): t'J i / i4 wicii44l) IGovernment jurisdiction of wetland: C le- Location: 1/4 S: . of 1/4 S: SW SEC: .21 • TWNSHP: 27 NRNGE• '1 • ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) / ' Site visit: ✓USGS Topo Map:k" NWI map: Aerial Photo: 1'"'Soils survey: IOther: _ z- Describe: q-lt rl 'fin \,,, ic, I i WHEN THE HELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE: 11. I Q.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. I Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not ' find someone with the expertise to answer the questions: Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO,contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. I la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing,grading, Y s:go to Q.3. filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, <N :go to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland Briefly describe the changes and your Iinformation source/s: l 1 lb. Are there populations of non-nativelants which are currently present and P currently appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yom.:go to Q.3. I populations and information source(s): ___populations d t. :oto lc. Ilc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the waterquality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3.' entering the system,direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of lo: ossible Iwastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,livestock use or dead fish etc. egory I Briefly describe: _ I 1 ./I • Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native I wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: . ' S Noto Does the wetland: go t Q.4. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland;. j YG Yes:go to 3a. I -or have a forested class greater than 1 acre; f*, Yes:go to 3b. ' I -or,have characteristics of an estuarine system; No Yes:go to 3c. -or•have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? fio Yes:go to 3d. I3a. Peat Wetlands. . 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover I . of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. I Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. I . I 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: Category I g ry No:go to 3b2. I 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50'tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? .. Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. 3b3. Is > 50% (areal cover)of the dominantlants in one or p more layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. 1 No: Category I • I . 111 . ) I • 4 Q.3c. Estuarine wetlands. - ( 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National I Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-151? Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. I3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I . or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. I or is the wetland< 1 acre? . Yes:go to 3c4. I . 3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria- Yes: Category I No: Category II • -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant. I species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; 1 -at least 75%of the wetland has a 100'buffer of un grazed pasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. j I3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II g rY No: Category III IQ.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I INo:3d2. Are go to 3d2. there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s)present with greater than 50% macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I I . No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands 4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre bnd, �� hydrologically isolated €a d. comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% I areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category N 4.2. Is the wetland:less than two acres Vie' No:goto4.2. • and, hydrologically isol e l,_ with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Ca N INo:go o Q I I I t I0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores - thatuali q fy 5a. Total wetland area acres I >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 Yes=3 I . Enter acreage of wetland here: ''' .5. acres, and source:creel 0.1-0.99 Yes=2 <0.1 Yes=1 'I Sb. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: Open Water. if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland area. Source: I NA atic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds>10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. Vq" q p I Emergent if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland ti-area. IScrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is>1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland area.ksav , . . Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. IAdd the number of wetland classes, above, that qualify,and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. Yes=1 I . e.g. If there are 4 classes(aquatic beds,open water,emergent & Yes=3Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 I5 Yes=10 6 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class. species I . For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b.above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not 3... Yes= have to name them. " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right: Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 " 3-4... Yes=2 a >9 . Yes=3 I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. 4 Scrub-Shrub . Yes=1 "2 3-4... Yes=2 �� � ,� >4... Yes=3 IF 90)1 4 Forested 1-2_ Yes=1 A y� " " 3-4_ Yes=2 ,y\ >4... Yes=3 rWei,^a4 I ,) I I . I 1 . 5d. Structural diversity. If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following. - -trees>50' tall Yes=1 I -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1 0 shrubs Yes=1 -herbaceous ground cover Yes=1 • 1 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? i . •{x i,s y :.] 1I tib-, •:'c. - ow },•e:ef lo '.:. :y_: ` ' r?s"< '`> • High=3 Mode te=2 ' r ' hi' \ \ «% - None=0tip ` % , / ♦ . ign •:$,.. •• + fi�dd•• \ \ .G;,..f,•$i;:{ti7;j%+v`•'yA:•;;:,•:};.:t+ i;Y.,{r'• ! I / / / / / I I / moderate ;:;:.;•w,"�':''>''' moderate ,\/\' , , high / ,\'\ \ 0 . . I 5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below,circle features that apply,and score to right: Is there evidence of current use by beavers? 4Y Ti Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? C Yes=2 C Are raptor nest/s located within 300" V I .... Yes=1 Are there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre? �� Yes=1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter? Yes=1. C./ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? .. Yes=1 C/ 1 • Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yes=1 6 , I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) . • Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: A I ' to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Nit? Yes=5 or• to a seasonal stream without fish; Yesd3-') . . or is not connected to any stream? Yes=O 1 I II I • I . • I . 5h. Buffers. STEP 1 BTEP 2 I Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2,if buffer width is 50-100'; I by 3,.if buffer width is >100'. Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or I parking lots: % 1)x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards Qr • annual crops: %_x 1= x _ = ungrazed grassland or ��� I orchards: %d-)} x 2= x _ = open water or r� native grasslands: %° x 3= x _ = Iforest or shrub: % ,x 4_ 4Mi x 7= Add Buffer total= l 2 Co STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total j 900-1200. . . Yeo. I 600-899. . .. Yes=3 300-599.. .. Yes=2 100-299.. .. Yes=1, 11 5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian corridor toother wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corn'dor> I • 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes=5 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide with low cover to any other habitat area? Yes -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or Ia significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? iYes=0 Q • .:/7-0/-) NOW: Add the scores circled (for Q.5a,-Q5i above) to get a Total .... Total IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points. . Yes: Category II� No: CategorIII I ) 4 t . V1 A 0 cE, `l 1- 5'icfi& r )99I I WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM' BACKGROUND INFORMATION: -. Name of Rater: .J )(t AffiIiation:. 1..4) M1W ( V Date: IName of wetland (if known): itve410.4, I i Wadi*6 - • Government Jurisdiction of wetland: 6 pf v ' `- . Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: 5 bV SEC: -74 TWNSHP: 219 N RNGE: 01 :- SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map:' NWI-map: Aerial Photo: Soils survey: IOther: Describe: 1" E X 1/1^ I ti When office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: 51.1-0-"` t • ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? NV I . Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or .W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next iby the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question , t I! Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question I Washington Department-of Wildlife or the Washington A p Department of Fisheries? , • IY I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question Ai ty 1 I IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) •IIs the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory birds? • No: Next Question Nri Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt Yes:Category.I Significance? No: Next Question NG I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes: Category II " plant species? . Heritage) No: Next Question I N Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes:Category II candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington - No: Next Department of Wildlife? Question I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by " & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question i Department of Fisheries? V if tr. Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented• W D Wildlife Yes: Category II by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question 1 Nv 1 Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? No: Next Question A+1; I Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III I Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Fo a 1 I 111- 1 I WeRP'S I ' wotoc 0)i-5 7 - ct4-6-f 1c14 a WETLANDS RATING HELD DATA FORM 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater 5n <etq Affiliation t\ ff V 4.1-) Date: (7°`"C IName of wetland (if known): ,YV A '€1 1 'P o— IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: �+ 4 � . Location: 1/4 5: ' of 1/4 S: 5-11\) r .SEC: I TWNSHP: 2W RNGE: 0? E ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map: V NWI map: ±Aerial Photo: , Soils survey: Other v Describe: _SIit �. 4 Nile WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE: IQ.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. 4 • Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. I 1a. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing, grading, Yes:go to Q.3. filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer,or culverts, ditches, No:go to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly describe the changes and your Iinformation source/s: Nte I lb. Are there populations of non-nativelants which are currently present and currently appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes:go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): 1\14. No:go to lc. i ____ _. . lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused di lmdisturbance of the water quality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of No:Possible Iwastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,Iivestock use or dead fish etc. CategorjJ Briefly describe: l _ I I 1 Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: No to 1: Does the wetland:. go t 4. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; O Yes:go to 3a. -orhave a forested class greater than 1 acre; ' Yes:go to 3b. -or,have characteristics of an estuarine system; Yes:go to 3c. -or,have eel grass, floating or non-floating `t kelp beds? Q Yes:go to 3d. I 3a. Peat Wetlands. 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have<25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? . Yes: Category I No:goto3b2. 3b2. Is,the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? .. Yes:g oto 3b3. INo:go to Q.S. 3b3. Is > 50%(areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. No: Category I r • I Q.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-15.19 . Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. • 111 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I. or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland< 1 acre? Yes:go to 3c4. 3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria. Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, ditching,,filling,cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant. species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of un grazed pasture,open water, shrub or forest; - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. 3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II No: Category III Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I I 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than 50% No:go to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands II4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre and, 44- hydrologically isolate 'and, comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (> 80% areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV yam► No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres and. hydrologically Bolded, ,,• with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal Leover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Cat s :, IV No.go . Q5 I I I , 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 I V -4.99 Yes=3 _S___I___ Enter acreage of wetland here:'1 acres, and source: 0.1 0.99 Yes=2 <I. Yes=1 ' 5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: N% G Open Water: if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland - area. Source: IA� Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds>10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. 1V� open I Emergent: if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland At. , area. I Scrub-Shrub: if the a of scrub- hrub class is> 1/2 acre or> 10% of the total wetland ' NV area. c 1 )1 Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. V Add the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify, and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. 1 Yes=1 I 2 Yes �3 e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergentSr 3 Yes V scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 ---� 5 Yes=10 ) 5c. Plant species diversity. #of I Class. species For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b.above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 /'` the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not 3... Yes=2 have to name them. , h " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right: Emergent 4110. Yes° Yes=2 e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an • >4... Yes=3 ' I emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 t,l)6 3-4... Yes=2 v >4... Yes=3 CArke Forested 1-2.. Yes0 F 3-4_ Yes=2CO ; .i " >4... Yes=3 ) i • I • • 1 . *5d. Structural diversity. • f If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: -trees>50' tall Yes=1 I .. -trees 20'-49' tall Yes 1 -shrubs Yes 00 • -herbaceous ground cover Yeses I5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? • k2 :. .4.4ti,,L,,.�oto:::tik::„. "fan .I.%•,:-..-"t ;,,,,,m0.• .:::::*,...00.4„:,4, ..,. •.#. L i4&^' },..... .. ;', : : #, -. �;>;. • .72 'y. . 4 {L k ..L .{{•Y.v .Q. �•M v•/ 1Y7�1 :•f.}�, fsP• c.. low >:,:}:; Y ;.}. to ! :4:'.' High=3 Moderate=2 �$(� ::: :<>::_: _: Low=1 ♦ \ . "t'.r,� :� c ,•.,v:. •;� ^- ' ::< :: None=0 I I%J moderate moderate \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 111 5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below,circle features that apply,and score to right: i IIs there evidence of current use by beavers? Ne- Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? 01- Yes=2 CO,...) Are raptor nest/s located within 3001 d1 Yes=1 Are there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre? D g Yes1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter? TVPYes=1 � I _ Are there any other perches (wires,poles or posts)? • W. ... Yes=1 Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yes=1 6,..) , I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) • • - I Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; d Yes=5 or to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes3 . or,is not connected to any stream? Yes`— d ,• .. I . •I . . (, I I - I ) 5h. Buffers. I STEP 1 ,STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; IThen multiply the %/s by the factor(s) by 3,.ifbuffer width is >100'. below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: I . right: roads, buildings or I parking lots: %j x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards Qr annual crops: % x 1= x _ =I _ ungrazed grassland or orchards: %?x 2= x _ = _ . open water or native grasslands: % x 3= x = 111 forest or shrub: % x 4= = '- 4k 1 . . x _ Add Buffer total= ISTEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total I 900-1200.. . Yes I 600-899. ... Yes=3 300-599.... Yes=2 I 100-299.. .. Yes=1 I5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> I • 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes =5 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yeo -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=0 Ci) II • NOW: Add the scores circled(for Q.5a.-Q.5i above) to get a Total .... Total = 2) IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points Yes: Category No: Categ IIIA 1 ) . I 5 1 WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM I _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: . . \f Name of Rater: 1NAffiliation: \) C4461 Date: 31*- IName of wetland (if known): \A -4k/ Pi ik IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: Cttla T4 + � t Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: SW SEC: 21 TWNSHP:' 1 Y- RNGE: (M :' • ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map V NWI map: V Aerial Photo: t.-- Soils survey: IOther: 1,* Describe: -° 0 itr .1 ; (� ' i When office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question . or Extirpated from Washington? 1 Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or W Dit W dhfe Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next Iby the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next . Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question I Washington DepartmentofWildlife or the Washington Department of Fisheries? I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question N 0 I V .. WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) . 111 Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? • No: Next : Question I Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local"Govt. Yes: Category.I I Significance? No: Next Question kfrOI Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes: Category II plant species? Heritage) No: Next Question Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes: Category1I candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington • No: Next Department of Wildlife? Question I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question Department of Fisheries? Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented W D Wildlife Yes: Category II by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question • Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? . . No: Next Question p Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Form 1 I • I I- 1 W0.4cE ow5)? - Ce `c>-e 1°!Cl I (I . WETLANDS RATING HELD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: e--- Name of Rater: --)a4.1KAffiliation: --tver, ,ft1/cefe Date: IName of wetland (if known): 341k IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: Cif, A iwerti Location: 1/4 5: of 1/4 S: 5-\ SEC: 2) , TWNSHP: 2900 RNGE: CIF 1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map-. NWI map: 'Aerial Photo: , Soils survey: IOther: Describe: Fru eiltii . _ Wct-Or / "" ( ( ,f IWHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE: Q.1. High OualityNatural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. • Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience todo so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing, grading, Yes:go to Q.3, filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, . No:go to Ib:' dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland. pr fly describe the changes and your Iinformation source/s: ,r r5 lb. Are there populations of non-nativelants which are currently present and P currently appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes:go to Q_3. populations and information source(s): No:go to c1 lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the water quality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3.' entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of No:Possible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,Iivestock use or dead fish etc. Category Briefly describe: – -- — ------------- I / 1 I ' i i Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: Does the wetland:. Not go Q.4. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; 17 Yes-go to 3a. -or have a forested class greater than 1 acre; Yes:go to 3b. -or have characteristics of an estuarine system; N Yes:go to 3c -or have eel grass, floating or non-floating kelp beds? C Yes:go to 3d. 3a. Peat Wetlands. 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years' . . Yes: Category I g rY No:go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50'tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. 1 3b3. Is > 50%(areal cover)of the dominantlants in p one or more layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. No: Category I r • �r I IQ.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National I Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-151? Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. II3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres;• Yes: Category I. . or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. 1 . or is the wetland< 1 acre? Yes:go to 3c4.• I3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria. Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, I ditching, filling,cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75%of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazed gr pasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. ( I3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II No: Category III Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I g 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s)present with greater than 50% No: o to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I I . No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands I4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre and. Alp hydrologically isolate and. comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (> 80% I areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres D . I and, hydrologically iso a ed,_ with one vegetated class, and > 90% of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Cat N No:got Q.5. I . 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres I >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 rf 1- 99 Yes=3 I Enter acreage of wetland here: acres, and source40 Yes ,1 _ <0.1 Yes=1 ' I5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . Open Water. if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland ' area. Source: IA uatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds> 10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. !" � q q p Emergent if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland I 190 area. . , 1i Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class > 2 acre or> 10% of the total wetland I 1'�°� area. .' 44. Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland area. IAdd the number of wetland classes, above, that qualify, and #of classes i . then score according to the columns at right. 1 Yes— 2 Yes e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds, open water,emergent & 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 I5 Yes=10 G 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class. species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not ." 3... Yes=2 have to name them. " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right. Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 ' 3-4... Yes=2 rid " 1 I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4... Yes=3 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 " 3-4... Yes=2 WM I " >4... Yes=3 • Forested Yes=1 0 " 3-4... Yes=2 . " >4... Yes=3 I ,) I . 5d. Structural diversity. f • If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: „-^^ • -trees>50' tall Yes&1) I • -trees 20'-49'tall Yes 1 -shrubs Yes 1' .„.„ -herbaceous ground cover Yes 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? � yK:i}' L LYe `CO tir � , : 4 : , kto ' yoW ,:*,..'f:'"0::<. .: .. High=3 • Mod erste=2 7.!.:::::::::7:46... ::>s:..; � 2r Low=1 .m.'+4'+ \ \ \ . § ::> :« r x '” J f > None=O ''(.k:' 'live{giil.;;, .\ee\ \ :i:eeee \ \ I moderate moderate ' ' high '.'\'\ \ CD I5f. Habitat features. • Answer questions below, circle features that apply, and score to right: 1 I' Is there evidence of current use by beavers? iVa Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? • Yes=2 C) Are raptor nest/s located within 300'? W Yes=1 I Are there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre? Yes=1 � Yes 1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter' Yes=1 6.) I _ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? ND Yes=1 • Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yes$ x I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) I Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=S or to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes � � . or,is not connected to any stream? Yes= I • I ( . I • I . 5h. Buffers. STEP •,STEP 2 I Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; I by 3,.ifbuffer width is >100'. Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or . I parking lots: %Ox 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards annual crops: % 1= x _ =I _ ungrazed grassland or orchards: V4-1x2= 4-1 x 2= x open water or native grasslands: %Ox 3= x _ = I _ forest or shrub: %Xidlc 4= x -3_ n . Add Buffer total=_ . I . STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer$ total 900-1200... Yes I 600-899. . .. Yes=3 300-599. . .. Yes=2 0100-299.... Yes=1 I5i. Connection to other habitat areas: Nil -Is there a riparian-corriid!r to tlier wetlands w�0.25 of a`fnile,or a corridor> I - 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=l -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or cultivated agricultural land? Yesr 1 .. yel �-"--_ • NOW: Add the scores circled(for Q5a.-Q.5i above) to get a Total . ... Total = -( IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points. . Yes: Catego No: Catego II� r I 1 WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM I _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: .5Name of Rater: - Kerlicl Affiliation: �j ''\ Date: 2 1 ‘.,, Name of wetland (if known): V.i 4/Thii — w 4116- 1 ! d GovernmentJurisdiction of wetland: Cif ' 29N OW Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: S SEC: -Z1 TWNSHP: RNGE: - SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: LOGS Topo Map: '` - NWI map: V Aerial Photo: L.",„_ Soils survey: t"--- Other: L''• Describe: )..,4 ': t f i o . IWhen office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA . CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) 1 111 • Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an.. Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? 1 Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or .W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next Iby the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question Washington DepartmentofWildlife or the Washington Department of Fisheries? -4.- II Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question N ti IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM"(CONTINUED) • Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category i national significance for migratory.birds? • No: Next Question Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local"Govt. Yes:Category.I Significance? No:Next Question . Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes:Category II • , plant species? Heritage) No:Next •Question Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes: CategoryiI candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington • No: Next Department of Wildlife? t Question• 1 Y I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes:Category U Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question . " Department of Fisheries? • Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented- W D Wildlife Yes: Category II by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and N_ o: Next Species Program? Question • eP 1 • Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? . . No: Next Question • Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category III Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data FR • " " • • 111- 1 I W W0.0c . °f1 57 - Ct4-c a 1cIc11 g • I WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: ec Name of Rater: � YeA47 Affiliation: �w • �� Date: 1 Name of wetland (if known): ,A)Q'rt'vti K — W 4 fil,\VG IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: '. pt- C-3( Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: 5-W SEC: . 21 TWNSHP;2W RNGE: �1 iSOURCES OF INFORMATION: '(Check all sources that apply) ✓ c.--- Site visit: USGS Topo Map: 1------ NWI map:"2 Aerial Photo: .Soils survey: IOther: v Describe: iI c d ()Itis / tAY-tY7:54, OVI (4- JM 64ger WHEN THE FIELD DATA �— FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE:ill, . . IQ.1. High Quality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to I questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or I hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing,grading, e• •go to Q.3. filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer,or culverts,ditches, - eVgo to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly describe the changes and your Iinformation source/s: M ,,.�,_rtr; 4. (4 111 lb. Are there populations of non-native plants which are currentlypresent and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes: lo to Q.3. populations and information source(s): .4o: , • to lc. 1 lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of thewater equality I of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced b culverts y Yes:go to Q.3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of No:Possible Iwastes, oily sheens,extreme eutrophic conditions,livestock use or dead fish etc. Categor() Briefly describe: / ./I i I 1^/ y Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: " f No t. _. Does the wetland:. go •. Q.4. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; D Yes:go to 3a. I -or•have a forested class greater than 1 acre; N c.t. Yes:go to 3b. I -or,have characteristics of an estuarine system; No Yes:go to 3c. -or•have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds' No Yes:go to 3d. r3a. Peat Wetlands. 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover I of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. I Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. t I • 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. I 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50'tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? .. Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. I 3b3. Is> 50%(areal cover)of the dominantlants in one or more ore layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. INo: Category I I 1 • IQ.3c. Estuarine wetlands. ( 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National I Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve,State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-15.1? Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. I3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I • or is the wetland 1-5 acres; .. Yes:go to 3c3. I or is the wetland< 1 acre? . Yes:go to 3c4. I3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria. Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plantI . species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; I -at least 75%of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazed gr pasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. I 3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II g �' No: Category III IQ.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I I . . . No:goto3d2. tere floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than 50% macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I I . No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands IIII- 4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre and, Af, hydrologically isolated and. comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV .Z,Zr ��I� No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland:less than two cr s • • I and, hydrologicall)solated,. with one vegetated class, and > 90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Cab., .i' I No:go .. Q5. • I I lI . ; 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres ' >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 1- .. Yes=3 I Enter acreage of wetland here: 19Cacres, and source: c 0.1- 1.'• Yes=2 G. <0.1 Yes=1 'lam' I5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that quad. . SID Open Water if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland . • area. Source: IAquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds> 10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. I k/41_,lEmergent if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. Jip Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or> 10% of the total wetland ' area. vo Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. I Add the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify, and #of dasses then score according to the columns at right. Yes=1 1 2. Yes e.g. If there are 4 classes(aquatic beds,open water,emergent & Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 I5 Yes=10 GD 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class. species 1 For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b.above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not ." 3... Yes=2 have to name them. " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right: Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 2-- " 3-4... Yes=2 ( S) I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4... Yes=3 '` emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. 30 b-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 O " 3-4... Yes=2 ) I �,.�. >4_. Yes=3 aid 1 Forested 1-2... Yes=1 In 3-4_ Yes=2 N " >4... Yes=3 t I . I , • 1 . 5d. Structural diversity. . If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: - . -trees>50' tall Yes=1 I . • .. -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1 -shrubs Yes=1 ei -herbaceous ground cover Yes=1 . 1 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? 1 .. : IYgL� 47.4,,,,,,,,..k.,40*.... a . " low •:. ryr';. to .,4 .< Hi h= Moderate=2 J I :. . >_ ♦ ♦ :•.+*i•:. • r 4 :: :. None=0 h•.` .••;:•.4.:.:.�' •..;.•h.}"J':1.6 ! / I / J / I /r/�/ ,;.y:'• •.`$'iaT•^ :.wu:i. i\'J\s/\J\i/ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Imoderate """••`.;"'"'`'• moderate \'\` ' ' high / J•I • • @ 1 5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below,circle features that apply,and score to right: IIs there evidence of current use by beavers? Y`G Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? At . Yes=2 C), Are raptor nest/s located within 300' ? Yes=1 I . Are there at least 3 standing dead trees (snags)per acre? t\iL Yes=1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter' hit Yes=1 rth Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? W . Yes=1 Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yes=1 0 . I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) . . Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 I or to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes=3 r•-•\_,‘. . or"is not connected to any stream Ye I I I I I • I ) 5h. Buffers. ' TEP 1 STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2,if buffer width is 50-100'; ' Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) by 3,.if buffer width is >100'. below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: • roads, buildings or I parldng lots: % 0 x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: %C x 1= x = I ungrazed grassland or orchards: %C) x 2= x _ = _ . open water or native grasslands: % V x 3= x _ = _ - Iforest or shrub: % 4)x 4= `Mkx 3= • Add Buffer total= • I . STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: � duffer total I 900-1200. .. Yes q) 600-899. . .. Yes= /' 300-599. . .. Yes=2 (� ) 100-299.. .. Yes=1 V/ I51. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> 1 • 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes-(5) -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wideI with low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or I . a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or cultivated agricultural land? Yes= c I • NOW: Add the scores circled(for Q5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total .... Total = % IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points... Yes: Category No: Catego III I I L . ADS 91-511 Oci-ce )991 . WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: .- . Name of Rater: 0s"\ Keirr,c Affiliation:. 1F-A4 ' -VIi" Date: £,2- Name of wetland (if known): Wetl tea/ L , 1.4.004 1-0/6. • . IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: Cf of 3c#reor . - . Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: S W SEC: 1 TWNSHP: /N RNGE:OF . • • Nw -26 SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) , / Site visit: V USGS Topo Map:. NWI map: 1---"Aerial Photo: ✓Soils survey: IOther: Describe: 1"i Q►11 ? 1; \46r. ,� 7644 Mile f C- Aver. 1447 IWhen office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE:_i_____ IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA - CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) 1 Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? Nip ' Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-Iisted or .W D Wildlife Yes: CategoryI candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next I by the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question NG I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or 8& No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question I Washington Department.of Wildlife or the Washington `G Department of Fisheries? , I v • I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question 0 I- I IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or • W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? • No:Next : Question y\ Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category I I Significance? No: Next Question N •I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes:Category Il - plant species? . Heritage) No: Next Question • �L C Does the- wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes:Category-II I candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington - No: Next Department of Wildlife? Question • I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries QuestionI Department of Fisheries? Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented' W D Wildlife Yes: Category H I by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and N_ o: Next Species Program? Question tit • Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II � ?Y eg rY Significance? No: Next Question j• • Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category III ' Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data form 1 1 I • • ■ WETLANDS RATING HELD DATA FORM ' BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: 3riset Affiliation: ?•,1\41 .('L/ r4' Date: i- Name of wetland (if known): ` eMpri L — ).t` ' Government Jurisdiction of wetland: C.411 Cibestvw Location: 114 S: of l/4 S: SEC: . 21 TWNSHP: 29 NRNGE:U NW :SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: ✓USGS Topo Map: NWI map: 4-Aerial Photo: 47-Soils survey: ' 0-� �1RI\ l Other: � Describe: �� y�pp f6J WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE: Q.1. High Quality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or I hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing, grading, o to Q.3. filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer,or culverts,ditches, . No:go to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the . d. :riefly describe the changes and your l information source/s: • Ilb. Are there populations of non-nativelants which are currentlypresent and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes:go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): No:go to lc. Ilc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the water quality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of No:Possible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,Iivestock use or dead fish etc. Category I Briefly describe: 1 •/1 II Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native I wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: I Does the wetland:. No to go Q.4. I -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; Wt. Yes:go to 3a. -or.have a forested class greater than 1 acre; NO Yes:go to 3b. -or•have characteristics of an estuarine system; V Yes:go to.3c. -or•have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? WP Yes:go to 3d. I3a. Peat Wetlands. ' 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have<25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. I Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. 1 I3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is I the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50'tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. I 3b3. Is> 50% (areal cover)of the dominantlants in one or more. P e layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. INo: Category I • I I I 1 1 Q.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National ' Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve,State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30451? Yes: Category I No:goto3c2. • 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I. • or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland< 1 acre? . Yes:go to 3c4.• ' 3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3 o the following 4 criteria. Yes:.Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, ' ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant. species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; ' -at least 75%of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazed gr pasture,open water, shrub or forest; - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. 3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II g ry No: Category III Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I 1 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s)present with greater than 50% No:go to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I . No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands 1 � 4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 a e and, "Vag' hydrologically isolated and, Alp comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV No:goto42. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acmes jag.. • ' and, hydrologically isolated,. 1Jcj with one vegetated class, and >9D%of areal cover is any • combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Catego u IV ' No:go t. . ` 1 1 1 , • 1 5d. Structural diversity. I If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: -trees>50' tall Yes=1 I -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1 Q -shrubs Yes=1 • -herbaceous ground cover d1. .. Yes=1 . I5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? I . t'• {??? C .AY.ah�#i%; iii•. d:•d{ :+tai+ ::t%:: • '':=.{ Y{i�:tiS�'•'`•�;(;f`f����)��)••)::''+�•�'%k{Y"'r.Y�}•p::.:; yQC)�,'��' 4•:;.+.+M....�{P:�n, fit' .. '%i. .J��.{,:.�Y:i3:v'. �CI:3'*. 0:..Aii.h;K::?:.?y.•: v'•4'?M1l ,,, ,rya+; . R A..,{Y ?.�;:;Y:}:: :•T:: :JY{Y;:{•Y:;�4:v:<mii?Y. •. •\?•• �.k'?i y\?:ti; :S �::{{.hiiY .+«Y. .w { nY:Y.v. ��'�{ii::Yr I nomVigoK ¢>.. : :>z•:.,'. low :::::.... ... :;k:'Y to• <,.Y, '::"�•, s ,;.y v••••. 4,>.....,Y:. + ;..:; >:>: . ,,, High=3 • Mod era& ;:>":: .:: Yom,;+•. {• ."- ' > : • :>: ..„,: • I aAv _ - None=O 1 -4;I•,•,%,•,•,%, moderate moderate ' ' high ' \'\ \ I 5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below, circle features that apply, and score to right: I Is there evidence of current use by beavers? tt . Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? 4 Yes=2 Are raptor nest/s located within 3001 NCI Yes.---1 I . there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre? " Ye g s Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10”in diameter' NiTi Yes= I . Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? NV...... Yes=1 • I • Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yes=1 0 , I5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) _ I Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: to a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 or• to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes=3 • I . or•is not connected to any stream? Yes=0 I n .> I . I I • •I • 5h. Buffers. I STEP1 •STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; I Then multiply'the %/s by the factor(s) by 3,.if buffer width is >100'. below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or ' parking lots: %6x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: % C"x 1= x _ = ungrazed grassland or I orchards: % x 2= x _ = _ . open water or native grasslands: %4/x 3= x _ = _ Iforest or shrub: %Aix 4= YVx 5 = /2co Add Buffer total=_ I STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total • I 900-1200.. . Yea I 600-899. . .. Yes=3 300-599. ... Yes=2 100-299. . .. Yes=1 51) I5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 025 of a mile,or a corridor> I • 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes!,, 1 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=O 1 • NOW: Add the scores circled (for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total . . . Total = t 1 IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points. .. Yes: Category No: Catego II -' I , I 00y, 91- s•. 0,4 1 clq f • 1 . WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM I _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: i Affiliation " ' P j y.CCDate: , IName of wetland (if known): t / M CU )/;/k IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: C^i'y ti)-CCA'N" A - Location: 1 4 S: of 1/4 S: S51/VE 2/V _ . / S C: TWNSHP: W RNGE: NW nd SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map: m NWI ap: Aerial Photo: Soils sury v IOther: Describe: T"RaWNS2rV') \ tir tI (4,4-,/, IWhen office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE:___S- I' ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA - CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY"column. qualifies) I • Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? NG Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-Iisted or _W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next Iby the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question k I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally Iisted or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question IWashington Department of Wildlife or the Washington Department of Fisheries? ] I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question IV 0 .. IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) • Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I ' national significance for migratory.birds? No: Next Question • Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category I Significance? No: Next Question I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes: Category II plant species? Heritage) No: Next Question Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-Iisted or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington • No: Next I - Department of Wildlife? Question t"r'jf ' Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question Department of Fisheries? Ivy Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented W D Wildlife Yes: Category II III Species Washington Department of WildIife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question IIs the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? No: Next Question Nib, Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III ' Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Fori{i 1 • • • I 1 1 WaOck 01i 5) - C 4i>"* 1°!q1 I WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM • IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: a -;r�te Name of Rater: )P.A keilVT Affiliation: Date: i " i Name of wetland (if known): �' ° 1N N! c�� ��1/6-- IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: Cth; t't ileorlf: eedVi\.."' Location: 1/4 5: of 1/4 S: C 1 u SEC: .21 TWNSHP: ' 91/RNGE: Cdc, ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) - L-- / Site visit: V LL L USGS Topo Map: NWI map: Aerial Photo: . Soils survey: Other: _ Describe: ��Cc I kINIee 64-'4, recil 1 WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE:.-x, Q.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. Ila. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing,grading, :go to Q.3. filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, ( go to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetlar1d. Briefly describe the changes and your Iinformation source/s: qr 1 lb. curr Are there populations of non-native lants which are — p ently present and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Y go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): o to lc. 1 lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the waterquality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3.' entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of No: Possible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,Iivestock use or dead fish etc. Cate o " I Briefly describe: — ...-..� • IQ.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: ' Does the wetland:. No to_: go Q4) -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; NDYes:go to 3a. -orhave a forested class greater than 1 acre; NG Yes:go to 3b. -or•have characteristics of an estuarine system; Yes:go to 3c. -or•have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? Yes:go to 3d. 3a. Peat Wetlands. 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have<25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. I 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees >50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. 3b3. Is> 50%(areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. No: Category I •I • rQ.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National IEstuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-15.19 Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. I 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I. • Ior is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland< 1 acre? Yes:go to 3c4.• I3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3 of the following 4 criteria- Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, ditching,.filling,cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant I species (see guidance for definition); I - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of ungrazed pasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. I3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II No: Category III 1 Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I No:go to 3d2. 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than 50% macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I I . No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands I4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 a e and, , hydrologically isolated and, 711k, comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (> 80% 1 areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV �2 No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two, es / Iand, hydrologically isol ted, l P"' with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Cat _. No:gote, .. I I I i\A I ' Q.S. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-999 Yes=4 1-499 Yes=3 Enter acreage of wetland here: acres, and source: 0. 0.99 Yes }e <0. Yes= I5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . 1 ` Open Water. if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland area. Source: I y Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds> 10%of the NG open water area or> 1/2 acre. Emergent: if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland \ area. I jScrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland area. frForested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland area. IAdd the number of wetland classes, above, that qualify, and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. 'j Yes=1 I Yes=3 e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent (Sr 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 I5 Yes=10 (3......) 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 :``" the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not " 3... Yes=2 C�;l have to name them. " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right: Emergent - . Yes=1(.) Yes=2 111 e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species, an >4... Yes=3 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 7-11 " 34... Yes j " >4_. Yes=3 Forested 1-2... Yes=1 I "" 3-4_. Yes=2 ► / >4... Yes=3 1 ) • • 1 5d. Structural diversity. f If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: -trees>50' tall Yes=1 I .. -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1 /_ • -shrubs Yes=1 0 . • -herbaceous ground cover Yes=1 . 1 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes , is high,moderate,low or none? itri ficbi;<'•.�• is ti}T �::+.t}Y<#r:•.{.: ;t: E`•' f'r,�", ''•�s:•iT?;F• {,;:$":•::S;rir,:::;{a;;:.^`�'.�:�7,'i8}:''�o et• # 3�:' ,,�fT Sii,_$,444:40::• x:::,..::„,:„:.::•••••. '3 x� ..Tp Yt:; •.•F:}>�{(:�•":?:;<•'' }\,.:. . },•.•• Qtiv':'r :h7,},.'•:2i,:{;;;'' ''!"•,e�4/'is • • p� .. 1 3. �/�� • 1 0 nom low T}i. .i +4 1 ................. • ...< .{. <{:... }.,�:}.};. �;:v �{�:}:.:' .• High=3 • • Moderate=2 s ::: .<;. - Low=1 {?f`•::::j::::+'. •.•. . '•.r`:•. $<{f}:n.}F: Y•:'. _— — rOr. > . \ \ \ • £<y`':•. } None=O i•.5 __ __- ;;;.4. ;{}}}y{y :•:?:inti:ii:v:}:;:; }}} ;:•:;:•; 'T': •}", •:v .. \ \ \ \ \ \ ' , C ^\ moderate moderate '\' \' ' ' high ".'''.,"41211111\ 1 5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below,circle features that apply,and score to right: 1 Is there evidence of current use by beavers? 1\1P. Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? Yes=2 (.6). Are raptor nest/s located within 300'7 "iG Yes=1 I . Are there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre? Nt> Yes=1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter? Yes=1 ,6"' Are there any other perches (wires,poles or posts)? No ' Yes_1 ' Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yes >/ t ! . Il5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) t~/ • III Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 or, to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes= • . or•is not connected to any stream? Ye--0 IC I . • II •I • 1 . • • I ) 5h. Buffers. • STEP 1 •BTEP 2 I Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; Iby 3,.ifbuffer width is >100'. Then multiply the %/s by the factors) below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or I parking lots: %2x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: %Cx 1= x _ = I ungrazed grassland or orchards: %C' x 2= x _ _ open water or native grasslands: %±x 3= x _ = _ Iforest or shrub: %A x 4= 46x _9= • Add Buffer total=_ ISPEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total • I 900-1200... Y 4 111 600-899. . .. Yes=3 300-599. . .. Yes=2 100-299. . .. Yes=1 t s)" I5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> .c I • 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes 45) -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=l -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and ori cultivated agricultural land? Yes= I NOW: Add the scores circled (for Q.5a.-Q.5i above) to get a Total .... Total = 7 IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points.. Yes: Cate o No: Cate III i . N ocz, ` ) sr, acts # ) t'li WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM I _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: . . s� . Name of Rater: ;r\ t"� Affiliation: •F.,(450./-.614-6()Date: 1 Name of wetland (if known): Wet/r-r dJ NI ` CU 4,416-- 1 Government Jurisdiction of wetland: C14) v6 a.61-14-141°' - Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: 1,J) SEC: 2/ TWNSHP: 2AIRNGE: Cid SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: V USGS Topo Map: L/ NWI map: Aerial Photo: Soils survey: ICACI Other: Describe: r/ � � � �( / -11 ' T i When office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: 1 " IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in "CATEGORY"column. qualifies) 1 Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? 1\k v Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-Iisted or .W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next Iby the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question N I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next . Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question I Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington Department of Fisheries? . `v I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question j • IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) . Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? • No: Next Question Mr, 1 J Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt Yes:Category I Significance? No: Next Question p I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes:Category II plant species? Heritage) No: Next Question � ! Does the wetland contain documented cu ented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes:CategoryII • candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington No: Next IDepartment of Wildlife? Question f Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question � / • Department of Fisheries? I Y 1 Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented W D Wildlife Yes: Category II by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question A ) Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? . . No: Next Question Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category III ISignificance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Fob, t Y t i 1 1 I tY ` W0.0cE °I1 S) - ali'c - - 1941 I .. WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: Keil( Affiliation: 1 ,(y4 Date: ,.- � I Name of wetland (if known): Ne er,./ 14 — C444 1ih I Government Jurisdiction of wetland: Clq7 t( r. Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: 51") SEC: 2-y TWNSHP:�MNGE: 6)E ISOURCES OFA INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map: NWI map: Aerial Photo: Soils survey: I 71,1 Other: Describe: _ 1i 1 i A 6,44 s I WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE.- IQ.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing, grading, o to Q.3. filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, (No- o to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland, Br• fly describe the changes and your Iinformation source/s: *,r„ g"� --- 1.:3-X _- - Z llb. Are there populations of non-native plants which are currently present and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes populations and information source(s): go to Q.3. o to lc. lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the waterquality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of No:Possible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,Iivestock use or dead fish etc. CategoI Briefly describe: r ./I . 1 r I ) Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native wetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: • t No to . Does the wetland:. go to • -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; f Yes:go to 3a. r -or have a forested class greater than 1 acre; Yes:go to 3b. -orhave characteristics of an estuarine system; NE( Yes:go to.3c. -orhave eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? NU Yes:go to 3d. 111 3a. Peat Wetlands. 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have<25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I No: go.to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? . . . Yes: Category I No: go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees >50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. No:go to Q.5. 3b3. Is > 50% (areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. ' No: Category I I1 1 1 I • 1 I .0 IQ.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park,National IEstuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-15.19 Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. I3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I. . or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. I or is the wetland < 1 acre? . Yes:go to 3c4.• I . 3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria. Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, I ditching,,filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; I -at least 75%of the wetland has a 100' buffer of ungrazed pasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. t3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II g rY No: Category III IQ.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I I3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s)present with greater than 50% No:go to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I 1 No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands 1o...... 0, 4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 a and hydrologically isolated`and, IN, ii comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category N /^ No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two ac es !. I . , hydrologcally so ated, with one vegetated class, and >90%/of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Cato;y ry N INo:go to I I I 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres III >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 Ir' 1-4.99 Yes=3 Enter acreage of wetland here: acres, and source- 0.1 ,99 Y• 2d r <0.1 Yes= 5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . Open Water. if the area of open water is> 1 2 acre or> 10%o f the . � pe / o total wetland �f " area. Source: 1Nc Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds> 10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. I \/ — Emergent: if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. I Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or> 10% of the total wetland ypt_:, e ra. 1Vco Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland area. IAdd the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify, and #of classes then score according to the columns at right. 1 Yes= Yes 3} I e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent & 2 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 I5 Yes=10 "/3 5c. Plant species diversity.p ty #of Class species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not 3... Yes=2 have to name them. " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right: Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 " 3-4... Yes=2 I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an Yes=3 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 " Yes=2 t::?...) " Yes=3 Forested 1-2... Yes=1 I " 3-4... Yes=2 N A >4... Yes=3 i • I . 5d. Structural diversity. . If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: • -trees>50' tall Yes=1 I -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1C)‘ • -shrubs Yes=1 • -herbaceous ground cover Yes=1 . t5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? {....4011011t4 , ^'i+ 1011ti. iii ;mX 4 ,�,• :. • • :r C {�,� 2ti ms, 00.... ::#::%2 ;Si::;;....„:000... .c {:cb'•, l i ''{ti^':�'"•,,`•;'y;.nx`�s;.,., �'Rw'�E •.,•'` {:.N� `ya,or. ?Y}{3,,'�;,•:.�; 0.00 tui. '.,•:.{ q+af::::,.,>:.? 10W "r;:: 4f ?•,`.`•?:• o '.x,x:':.=i ,,.: 4.;,x:,:h.<.:' .a ::::: ": :•:v::::. ...t<' High— Moderate=2 -- Low=1:::a" ;. ' � I1W:4::*AVM `r None= 0 I / \ \ \ ♦ \ \ \ \ I J odera.'•. \ \ m to � moderate high • 0 I5f. Habitat features. • Answer questions below, circle features that apply, and score to right (. Is there evidence of current use by beavers? tiVYes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? Yes=2 Y /"/c Are raptor nest/s located within 300'? .�V Yes=1 Are there at least 3 standing dead trees (snags)per acre? Yes=1 1`t Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10" in diameter? 14ci Yes=1. I _ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? Nc• Yes=1 Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Ye 1 'ej,)''r 1 5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) . Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: I to perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 or• to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes . or,is not connected to any stream? Ye• tIOPPI •I I • • • 5h. Buffers. • I STEP 1 •STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the %of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; 1 by 3,.ifbuffer width is >100'. Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or I parking lots: % x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyardsr annual crops: %Vx 1= x _ _ ungrazed grassland or I orchards: %0x 2= x _ _ _ open water or native grasslands: % 0 x 3= x _ _ I forest or shrub: % — c 4= t x � et() I . ,iu`Trry A Add Buffer total= t ( STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total 900-1200... Yes=4 I 0-89 . .. Yes=3 599. . .. Yes=2 Cll.) 100-299.. .. Yes=1 I5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> 1 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes6 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide 1 with low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or Ia significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or cultivated agricultural land? Yes= c f • NOW: Add the scores circled (for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total .... Total = 20 IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points Yes: Catego No: Catego I ) I 1 (O 9)-5'1 Octel:/:,-,-.)991 WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM I_ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: . Name of Rater: ' Ktrv,e Affiliation: E`- rlyvCore Date: -0 � Name of wetland (if known): G3) (W� e I Government Jurisdiction of wetland: C-iC() #��r ✓u+.e Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: SEC: 21 TWNSHP: ' IVRNGE: ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: 1/USGS Topo Map: NWI map: Aerial Photo' Soils survey 1 P Other: _le' � �Describe: fli `; W rVk k? When office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA _ CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY" column. qualifies) • Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? IV to` Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or .W D Wildlife Yes: Category I I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next by the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question 4 tv to' 1 Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question Washington DepartmentofWildlife or the Washington Department of Fisheries? 1\01 Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next Question f3) I I L IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) I Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? • No: Next Question i I - t Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category.I Significance? No: Next Question ww }} I Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes: Category II ' plant species? - Heritage) No: Next Question NIC. Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-Iisted or W D Wildlife Yes: Category TI candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington - No: Next IDepartment of Wildlife? - Question tiF ie I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes:Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by . & No: Next �1t the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question . tJ I Department of Fisheries? • Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented W D Wildlife Yes: Category II by Washington Department of WildIife's Priority Habitats and N_ o: Next Species Program? Question • I- Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. g ry Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? . - No: Next I Question g I Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III Significance? No:Go to _ Wetlands Rating Field Data Form Iv, I 1 • I I I 441 o W0.0c. °Il 5) - aAcc 1ciq 1 WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM IIBACKGROUND INFORMATION: ------\ c Name of Rater: ; ,,r-1'Kell Affiliation: `' 4 Date: Name of wetland (if known): 'I O—cl 0 — tn/`�1 k1' Government jurisdiction of wetland: C- V `(`el I . � 1 VVV Location: 1/4 5: of 1/4 S: WE SEC: .(29 TWNSHP: 29N RNGE: (:)/E- ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map: NWI map: `Aerial Photo: Soils survey: �.--- I Other: Describe: - n.r,),:„.,, ct,, kc,1 I14e-r- (ll)Of I WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE:1„..- f 111 Q.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. s Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. Ila. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing, grading, ye .go to Q.3. filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer,or culverts,ditches, No:'go to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly describe the changes and your Iinformation source/s: +_ + G550 1 lb. Are there populations of non-native plants which are currently present and appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant Yes:go to Q.3. 1 populations and information source(s): No:go to lc. lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the water quality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:go to Q.3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of No:Possible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,livestock use or dead fish etc. Category I Briefly describe: I , • Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native Iwetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: - 1No to Does the wetland: go ta� ` -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; Nt., Yes:go to 3a. -or have a forested class greater than 1 acre; Nic Yes:go to 3b. I -or have characteristics of an estuarine system; lk,ic Yes:go to 3c. -or•have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? N Yes:go to 3d. I 3a. Peat Wetlands. 1 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I INo: go.to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. I3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. I 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. INo:go to Q.5. 3b3. Is> 50%(areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more.layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. INo: Category I I I I I • 1 IQac. Estuarine wetlands. f 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National I Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-1519 . Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. ' 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I. or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. I or is the wetland< 1 acre? Yes:go to 3c4. I3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria. Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, I ditching, filling,cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; I -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of un az gr ed pasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. I3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II No: Category III IQ.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I I No:go to 3d2. 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s)present with greater than 50% macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I I . No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands I /y°� 4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acirY and. /)D/ hydrologically isolated'and, U comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% I areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV /,l� , No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres ,,p�A . and, hydrologically isa7ated, WI' with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Cate •.._,.IV INo:go tl Q5. I I � 1 0 . 1 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores . that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres I >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5-9.99 Yes=4 C„f99 Yes=3 1 Enter acreage of wetland here: acres, and source '47 -0.9 Yes=2 <0.1 Yes=1 ' -I 5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . Open Water. if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland - area. Source: I Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds> 10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. q p I mU ,Emergent if the area of emergentclass is>1/2 acre or? 10%of the total wetland area. S Yv i reoas I 1,pi_ Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland area. vPk Forested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. AddI the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify, and #of classes I then score according to the columns at right. Yes=1 I 6s) Yes=3e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent & Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 5 Yes=10 ( 3 ) 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class species I For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the numberof different plant species you can find. You do not 3... Yes=2 V have to name them. . " >3... Yes=3 I Score in column at far right Emergent 1-2... Yes=1 " 34... Yes=2 G I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4... Yes=3 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. ) ag, Scrub-Shrub 0.. Yes /(.1) I N,•�, (, � C 34... Yes==� \i'l ' 1- >4... Yes=3 i \ �/`u4G,,v Forested 1- . Yes=1 I 1 }d^ ^ Yes=2 WI >4... Yes=3 • Ii I . 5d. Structural diversity. f! If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: • • -trees>50' tall Yes=1 -trees 20'-49' tall Yes 1 -shrubs Yesg6, • -herbaceous ground cover Yes 1 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes r is high,moderate,low or none? '�}Sti}'iiia i,+4ly'S{•i. u}\,f¢4vy ..e0..r .. W i. ,, AMA^\:A.61` 2?ni.$, .:+ •40:'...-�:"''.:,'"2•. i .•{?..: IV ,y}y��: 'i�'p . :L:?ii;ti'})Pr•\ {rl •�`•,�;i}}:i j:{y+;.:i•• t•i� t ?.;•::4 n;\}{:'•111 r �:'•r,:-0i,44:�v,},h{h•,,:�;v.},..{.:} •.,� +'ii.�r:�.:. ......4:40:0:i: :0'. :�ti;{ :%•#>:i.4;:t;yii;tiw,i;":;:>;t}•s}y;{;>%tiff . `,:..: ..,. `.tlq,,,,SA51{•:I,::::'• 'fti.J.J.A,n :•:•Y iiJ iv.• yy .,i 1 +{ 0 r� ow i, h:�:c:�.y.,.r..::. "'�>�z �s%?�: �,`>. '.%rg{.:,.•:• � High=3 Mode a.te=2 ``$ Aiiiii;•,:;ara} ..,::::40:4.:' - Low 1' .j:, n — \ e 0 s<�` e �Tf ‘e%,"%,‘ / v:f: /•I•/ '41 144100 / rnoderate� moderate••• • high \ \ \ • ifi . . I5f. Habitat features. • Answer questions below, circle features that apply,and score to right: IIs there evidence of current use by beavers? tVc Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? Yes=2 CO Are raptor nest/s located within 300'? Yes=1 Are there at least 3 standing dead trees (snags)per acre? N U Yes=1 Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10"in diameter? I` Yes=1 111 _ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? p Yes=1 • • Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? • Yes 1 r . • 111 5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) 1 • Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: I to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 or•to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes= . or,is not connected to any stream? Yes 0 C..„") I I4 I . I ) 5h. Buffers. I STEP 1 •,STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; ' adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) by 3,.if buffer width is >100'. below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: I right: • roads, buildings or I parking lots: % Cix 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: %n C` x 1= x = ungrazed grassland or — = orchards: %L x 2= x • I open water or native grasslands: % x 3= x _ = _ I ' rrte� forest or shrub: % x 4= 3 Xx Z= &7� r.,/ e*`^ -N 6.r.4.,Add Buffer total=4 ' STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total I 9001200.,,. Yes=4 I -1-00-8 - . Yes=3 599. . .. Yes=2 �^ 100-299.. .. Yes=1 ' I5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Y6 J__:_5_} -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide Iwith low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or I a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=O 1 ) NOW: Add the scores circled (for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total .... Total = 'V Is the Total greater than or equal to 22 points Yes: Category II No: Category I- • ‘1/41,) (c 9)- 5'x. 0,4-4,,e, )c,,91 WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: 'h^IcAffiliation: %71 ' Date IName of wetland (if known): \IVei4a+o/ ? i�/�'�` Mr!" IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: Ci l7 " Location: 1/4 S: • of 1/4 S: IV VO SEC: 2y, TWNSHP: RNGE:at SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) L.--- Site visit: SGS Topo Map: C� NWm I" ap: Aerial Photo: Le.-- Soils survey: IOther: L(Describe: .7s;c1 1 W 7 mo D crib,c-,,," y me t IWhen office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA . CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in"CATEGORY" column. qualifies) Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an- Heritage) No: Next I historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? Mi I Does the wetlandn co fain documented habitats for State-Iisted or .W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next Iby the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally Iisted or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next . Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question I Washington DepartmentofWildlife or the Washington IV , Department of Fisheries? 1 V I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next mi Question I I 1 • IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory.birds? No: Next Question 1 Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category I I Significance? No: Next Question Does the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes: Category II . plant species? Heritage) No: Next Question } I Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington • No: Next Department of Wildlife? Question I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question IDepartment of Fisheries? frt Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented W D Wildlife Yes: Category II I by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Question hi, ie, IIs the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II Significance? No: Next Question •K I V I Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Form 1 IJ 1 f 1 I Wckoc °11-5 7 - ct..\-er 1gg1 I . WETLANDS RATING FIELD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Name of Rater: }vrn k Affiliation: Trn�v rielV• " Date: 1 Name of wetland (if known): _ V 4t ? — Capt._ i1l-c Government Jurisdiction of wetland: _ 514 Location: 1/4 S: of 1/4 S: Nlr�) SEC TWNSHP: 2 VRNGE: 'VI ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: AV USGS Topo Mapl---- 1 NWI map: 1..' Aerial Photo: .Soils survey: 1 Other: _ " Describe: _'')'ll (AV C)�t ,.. g ,( ( " A., - I WHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE /� 111 Q.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. la. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or I hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing, grading, tio to Q.3, filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, o: to lb. dredging,diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly describe the changes and your 1 information source/s: I lb. Are there populations of non-nativelants which are present and currently appear to be invading native populations?. Briefly describe any non-native plant Y :go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): Nooto lc. lc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the water quality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culverts Yes:;go to Q.3. entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping of /No: ossible I wastes, oily sheens,extreme eutrophic conditions,livestock use or dead fish etc. tegory I Briefly describe: I 1 ./i I I Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities i The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native Iwetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: - ' Does the wetland: No to I: go toL� -have ata least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; G I ^ ' Yes:go to 3a. -or.have a forested class greater than 1 acre; '�1 r- Yes:go to 3b. 1 -or,have characteristics of an estuarine system; Nt Yes:go to 3c. -or,have eel grass,floating or non-floating kelp beds? f1 Yes:go to 3d. . 3a. Peat Wetlands. - 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover I of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I I No: go to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. i • I3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years . Yes: Category I No:go to 3b2. 3b2. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-80 years,and is I the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50' tall and trees 20'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3b3. INo: go to Q.5. 3b3. Is > 50% (areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more.layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. No: Category I • I 1 _ ' Q.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National ' Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-1519 .. Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes:Category I. • or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland< 1 acre? • Yes:go to 3c4. 3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria. Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, ditching,.filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant. species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75% of the wetland has a 100'buffer of un grazed pasture,open water, shrub or forest; - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. (' 3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II No: Category III Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I g 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than 50% No: o to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I No: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands • 4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre nd,A9 hydrologically isolated and. • comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% ' areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two airs ' and, hydrologically isolated, with one vegetated class, and > 90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Cat ' IV No:go o Q5. 1 I I0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify �5a. Total wetland area acres >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 10-19.99 Yes=5 in the far column: 5- ' '• Yes=4 ' el fi IIIEIM Yes=3 Enter acreage of wetland here: oma'F acres, and source: 3____ ___ 0.1-0.99 Yes=2 , <0.1 Yes=1 -C-3--) ISb. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . Nt.., Open Water: if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland - area. Source: I Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds> 10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. 4t� q q p I it jet Emergent: ifdhe area f e grg t class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland PPV area. 1 Sh f v 7r Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or>10% of the total wetland I. V°:°--area. . riYorested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>. 0% f the total wetland area. Add the number of wetland classes,above, that qualify,and #of classes i . then score according to the columns at right. 1 Yes& I 2 Yes=3 e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent & 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 co I5 Yes=10 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class species I .For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b. above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 (C.,/) the number.of different plant species you can find. You do not 3... Yes=2 have to name them. " >3... Yes=3 IScore in column at far right: Emergent 1-2... Yes (I.!) I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species,an >4... Yes=3 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 .,----.. " ED Yes=2 ? i I " •... Yes=3 Forested 1-2.. Yes=1 I 3-4_ Yes=2 N >4... Yes=3 • I I I . 5d. Structural diversity. f • If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: -trees>50' tall Yes=1 -trees 20'-49'tall Yes=1 -shrubs6.".9 Yes=1 • -herbaceous ground cover Yes=1 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? • ::;i'.',\•�'T�1::a :� de5nst .: >�':':,:.!'\•11401.4.P:: :{�»:r•Tf ;;;a'�Td,°'P�h�'•:��.,;;T•i$?rh`.;•k 'ix.kf. �,',,\`zi}.�}}`},y'd�i::t{ ,�4.ij� •.�T �ky'.�',. %{}({S..nS.}}. ..., S�'y,+•i,:;•):• '•;51.x••3" "<E y!.<,;! . ifs} ,$.\ •TJ•.y:\ ;Y.:,+.:k!' : }:* :b,•:},'r- •i l:rJ.•,Xw}i .}�.: .{;,v •�4:2V.`� .r) x:l <T:u.}+"• i �}: }'rye,,,;,,,,. . r� Q 1 Off♦r, F: v°:y� f.T:<�;;�.::::�� High=3 Moderate=2 I :::.}:...\ Aider r ;}{}# : Low=1 - None.° J / r'/ J J .. ..."111220„ moderate•• moderate•�, \ high \ \ \ 0 I5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below,circle features that apply,and score to right: • (. I Is there evidence of current use by beavers? Nit . Yes=3 ;ri Is a heron rookery located within 300'? Wt. . Yes=2"G-) Are raptor nest/s located within 300'? a Yes=1+„.- ' Are there at least 3 standing dead trees (snags)per acre? V Ye Are any of these standing dead trees(snags)> 10" in diameter? lir = s1Yes=1. (.9. I _ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? Ni• If • Yes=1 rte"\ Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? YE fi 5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) P Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: I , to'a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 or• to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes . or•is not connected to any stream? Yes= �:_) I � I I • 1 . • I . 5h. Buffers. • I STEP 1 STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the%of each Multiply result(s) of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1, if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; I by 3,.ifbuffer width is >100'. Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) below and enter result in column to. Enter results below and add subscore: Iright: roads, buildings or I parking lots: % x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards/or • annual crops: % ‘"' x1= x ___ = I ungrazed grassland or orchards: % ` x 2= x _ = open water or native grasslands: %6_1 x 3= x _ = _ I forest or shrub: 9'c x 4= x 3 = / 14_ • Add Buffer total • ' STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: Buffer total , 900-1200. .. Ye?-4,i,i I 600-899.. .. Yes= 300-599.. .. Yes=2 100-299.. .. Yes=1 yj I5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> I100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes `ti -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wideI ��// with low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=l -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or cultivated agricultural land? Yes=CC__-_ .) . 1 NOW: Add the scores circled (for Q.5a.-Q5i above) to get a Total .... Total = -`) IIs the Total greater than or equal to 22 points. . Yes: Category No: Catego y'"III� 00cE `l)- 51 Ocie).:7-t- 91 WETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM I _ BACKGROUND INFORMATION: , . Name of Rater: Keit ( Affiliation: --r\Q ` 1( Date: C IName of wetland (if known): W&h -j CI - P,Pc I Government jurisdiction of wetland: CL's36,,,e, - 111 Location: 1/4 S: of 1 4 S: SEC: 2 2 N O • / / TWNSHP: RNGE: I SOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map: NWI'map: Aerial Photo: Soils survey: IOther lr Describe: ) ri ?)..41 P \ '7oiftle _c4eikr, / r When office and/or field data forms are completed ENTER CATEGORY HERE: I IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW. If the source agency DATA . CATEGORY identifies the wetland as satisfying any of the questions below, SOURCE (the highest circle the category in "CATEGORY"column. qualifies) I Does the wetland contain individuals of Federal or-State-listed DNR (Natural Yes: Category I I Threatened or Endangered plant species;or is the wetland an-- Heritage) No: Next historic location of a plant species thought to be possibly Extinct Question or Extirpated from Washington? { 1 Does the wetland contain documented habitats for State-listed or .W D Wildlife Yes: Category I candidate Threatened or Endangered wildlife species managed No: Next by the Washington Department of Wildlife? Question I Y . I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category I Federally listed or State or Federal candidate Threatened or & No: Next Endangered fish species,or races of fish,managed by the W D Fisheries Question Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington IDepartment of Fisheries? I Is the wetland already on record with the Washington Natural DNR (Natural Yes: Category I Heritage Program as.a high quality native wetland? Heritage) No: Next _ Question IVO I II- I IWETLANDS RATING OFFICE DATA FORM (CONTINUED) I _ Is the wetland documented habitat of regional (Pacific Coast) or W D Wildlife Yes:Category I national significance for migratory birds? No: Next Question n } Is the wetland documented as Category I Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes:Category.I I Significance? No: Next Question % IDoes the wetland contain individuals of State-listed Sensitive DNR (Natural Yes: Category II . plant species? Heritage) No: Next Question Does the wetland contain documented habitat for State-listed or W D Wildlife Yes:Category II candidate sensitive wildlife species managed by the Washington • No: Next Department of Wildlife? Question i) I Does the wetland contain documented habitats of State or W D Wildlife Yes: Category II Federally listed or candidate Sensitive fish species managed by & No: Next the Washington Department of Wildlife or the Washington W D Fisheries Question IDepartment of Fisheries? I Does the wetland contain priority species or habitats documented- W D Wildlife Yes: Category II by Washington Department of Wildlife's Priority Habitats and No: Next Species Program? Questionk 1 I. Is the wetland documented as a Category II Wetland of Local. Local Govt. Yes: Category II g TY Significance? No: Next I Question a 1 IVii I Is the wetland documented as a Category III Wetland of Local Local Govt. Yes: Category III Significance? No:Go to Wetlands Rating Field Data Form I - r I I Cc WO, c€ 90-5 7 — CtA > IggI WETLANDS RATING FThLD DATA FORM IBACKGROUND INFORMATION: ig Name of Rater: v"i\ Affiliation: 5164tibe_cte:C Date: c- I Name of wetland (if known): I ' �* Q .c W %— W IGovernment Jurisdiction of wetland: k t� y , Location: 1/4 5: of 1/4 S: N SEC: .2 E TWNSHP: 24 RNGE• C E • ISOURCES OF INFORMATION: (Check all sources that apply) Site visit: USGS Topo Map: !i NWI map: CiAerial Photo: t----, Soils survey: Other: C- ► I 6escribe: ,`a1 s:3, i @'''� I L^ kvf n - moi to IWHEN THE FIELD DATA FORM IS COMPLETE ENTER CATEGORY HERE:5. 1 Q.1. High Ouality Natural Heritage Wetland. Circle answers. Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so. If not I find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then,if the answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage program of DNR. I 1a. Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or hydrology of the wetland? Significant changes could include clearing, grading,. Yes:go to Q.3, filling,logging of the wetland or its immediate buffer, or culverts,ditches, lo, o to lb. dredging, diking or drainage of the wetland. Briefly dpscrpe the changes andou Iinformation source/s: £$ctt i GOI Ilb. Are there populations of non-nativelants which are currently present P currently tand appear to be invading native populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant :go to Q.3. populations and information source(s): No:go to lc. Ilc. Is there significant evidence of human-caused disturbance of the waterquality of the system? Degradation of water quality could be evidenced by culvertsgo to Q.3.' entering the system, direct road/parking lot runoff,evidence of historic dumping o o: ossible I wastes, oily sheens, extreme eutrophic conditions,Iivestock use or dead fish etc. egory I Briefly describe: Il i I i • 6‹.) • Q.2. Regionally Rare Native Wetland Communities The Department of Ecology is developing a methodology for regionally rare native Iwetland communities. It is not yet available for use. Q.3. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions: . No to all: Does the wetland: go to Q.4. -have at a least 1/2 acre of contiguous peat wetland; d Yes:go to 3a. -or have a forested class greater than 1 acre; Yes:go 0 3b.. I -or•have characteristics of an estuarine system; `\c' Yes:go to 3c. -or,have eel grass, floating or non-floating kelp beds' �YO Yes:go to 3d. I 3a. Peat Wetlands. I • 3a1. Does at least 1/2 acre of the contiguous peat wetland have< 25% areal cover of any combination of species from the list of invasive/exotic species on p.19, and have <80% areal cover of Spirea douglasii? Yes: Category I INo: go.to Q.4. Q.3b. Mature forested wetland. I . 3b1. Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland >80 years? • : Category I i g D' 0 No: ;oto 3b2. 3b Is the average age of dominant trees in the forested wetland 50-8(� I years,and is the structural diversity high as characterized by a multi-layer community of trees>50'tall and trees'0'-49' tall and shrubs and herbaceous groundcover? . . Yes:go to 3.-:NO .. No:go . Q.8. 3b3. Is > 50% (areal cover)of the dominant plants in one or more.layers(canopy, young trees, shrubs,herbs) invasive/exotic plant species from the p.19 list?. . Yes:go to Q.5. INo: Category I I I I ) 1 1 Q.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National IEstuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-1519 . Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. • I 3c2. Is the wetland>5 acres; Yes: Category I • Ior is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland< 1 acre? Yes:go to 3c4. 1 3c3. Does the wetland meet at least 3.of the following 4 criteria. Yes: Category I No: Category II -minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking, I ditching, filling,cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant. species (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; -at least 75%of the wetland has a 100' .0 b ffer of ungrazed pasture,open water, shrub or forest; I - has at least 3 of the followingfeatures: low marsh; high igh marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. I3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category II No: Category III IQ.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I I3d2. No:go to 3d2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than 50% macro algal cover in the month of August or September? Yes: Category I INo: Category II Q.4. Category IV wetlands I4.1. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre and. hydrologically isolated and. comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (>80% - areal cover)by one species from the list in guidance p.18 Yes: Category IV No:go to 4.2. 4.2. Is the wetland: less than two acres . I and, hydrologically isolated, with one vegetated class, and >90%of areal cover is any combination of species from the list in guidance p.19 Yes: Category IV 1 No:go to Q.5. I I 0.5. Significant habitat value. Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circle scores that qualify 5a. Total wetland area acres >20.00 Yes=6 Estimate area,select from choices in the near-right column,and score 0, 11 Yes=5 in the far column: 4 K 5-9.99 Yes=4 9IIi9 ��c‘./041 -4.99 Yes=3 (' Enter acreage of wetland here: acres, and source: 0.1-0.99 Yes=2 <0.1 Yes=1 ' I5b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify: . It Open Water if the area of open water is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland - area. Source: I Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds>10%of the open water area or> 1/2 acre. q p I ) Emergent: if the area of emergent class is> 1/2 acre or> 10%of the total wetland Narea. Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/2 acre or> 10% of the total wetland area. I \ iForested: if area of forested class is > 1/2 acre or>10%of the total wetland area. Add the number of wetland classes, above, that qualify, and #of lasses then score according to the columns at right. Yes=1 2 • Yes=3 1 e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water,emergent 8r 3 Yes=5 scrub-shrub),you would circle 7 points in the far right column. 4 Yes=7 I5 Yes=10 5c. Plant species diversity. #of Class. species 111 For all wetland classes (at right) that qualify in 5b.above, count Aquatic Bed 1-2... Yes=1 the number.of different plant species you can find. You do not ." 3... Yes=2 V have to name them. >3_. Yes=3 IScore in column at far right Ement 1-2... Yes=1 , 311... Yes=2 1$1/ l,#) I e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species, an >4 . Yes=3 emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub class with 2 species you would circle 2,2,and 1 in the far column. Scrub-Shrub 1-2... Yes=1 " (... Yes=2 0 " >4... Yes=3 • Forested 1-2... Yes=1 " ;g'). Yes=2 j?. >4... Yes=3 I ) — I I • 5d. Structural diversity. • If the wetland has a forested class,add 1 point for each of the following: -trees>50' tall Yes? III -trees 20'-49'tall Yes -shrubs Yest . -herbaceous ground cover Yes ;1 .. . 11 . 5e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? t;}?}H�ti.�,;`•..`.h.,`'�,v'`�,k,`•i' ,•Y,.•,.?t ..,:°V,.'"•:'t'��{�L.4 v`�:,Sa�A�y.x( {{•.ri.'. S{00$01.i..::•::,:j'+�{ •.M14 ..Ww� 4 Ji �lemmimamar / vA• }i%l•: {f N: n�?ltibii f�"v,{:4n .fi�}:: ia- 1 I - 1 r� ow' 3 ........................ "'�.r�:�:>l~.:v,:::. ":''��'�' '`��<�����• .:�: High=3 Moderat =2) :ft::c>.:M.. )row-1 N n — IJ - e 0 I ,•,%, �`I J n •••v ry • I I I / / I / I .• IIIJ / Itmoderate high . . (T3) 5f. Habitat features. Answer questions below, circle features that apply, and score to right: IIs there evidence of current use by beavers? N 'C Yes=3 Is a heron rookery located within 300'? �F Yes=2 :2 ) Are raptor nest/s located within 3001 W' Yes=1 I Are there at least 3 standingdead trees(snags)per acre? Yes=1 g Yes-1 fJ Are any of these standing dead trees(snags) > 10"in diameter? Yes=1 C I _ Are there any other perches(wires,poles or posts)? . WV . Yes=1 • Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre? Yer it 2.:0) . 1 , 5g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.) . . I Is the wetland connected at any time of the year via surface water: to a perennial stream or a seasonal stream with fish; Yes=5 or to a seasonal stream without fish; Yes /D. 3 $ ii . or,is not connected to any stream? Yes= • I l I I . • 5h. Buffers. TEP 1 STEP 2 Estimate(to the nearest 5%)the %of each Multiply result(s)of step 1: buffer or land-use type(below)that by 1,if buffer width is 25-50'; adjoins the wetland boundary. by 2, if buffer width is 50-100'; Then multiply the %/s by the factor(s) by 3,.if buffer width is >100'. below and enter result in column to Enter results below and add subscore: right: • roads, buildings or parking lots: %_x 0= 0 lawn, grazed pasture, vineyards or annual crops: %_x 1= x _ = _ ungrazed grassland or orchards: %x 2= x _ open water or native grasslands: %_x 3= x _ = forest or shrub: %f c 4= 94,1 x = 1 -2.ct70 Add Buffer total= STEP 3. Score points according to table at right: ;• • - 91.0 1211) Yes 600-899. . .. Yes=3 300-599. . .. Yes=2 100-299. . .. Yes=1 5i. Connection to other habitat areas: -Is there a riparian-corridor to other wetlands within 0.25 of a mile,or a corridor> I • 100' wide with good forest or shrub cover to any other habitat area? Yes) -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with good cover or a wide corridor>100'wide with low cover to any other habitat area? Yes=3 -Is there a narrow corridor< 100' wide with low cover or a significant habitat area within 0.25 mile but no corridor? Yes=1 -Is the wetland and buffer completely isolated by development and or • cultivated agricultural land? Yes=0 f" • NOW: Add the scores circled (for Q.5a.-Q51 above) to get a Total .... Total = 3 ,,,._, Is the Total greater than or equal to 22 points. Yes: Categor f., ) No: Category III • 1 BREMERTON CRITICAL LANDS ORDINANCE TABLE OP CONTENTS 1 CHAPTER PAGE I• Purpose Intent 1 Scope and Applicability Abrogation and Greater Restrictions II• Definitions 3 �• Administrative Procedures 8 IV. Aquifer Recharge Areas 9 V. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas 10 VI. Flood Hazard Areas • 12 VII• Geologically Hazardous Areas 13 VII. Wetlands and Stream Corridors 18 IX. Environmentally Sensitive Designation 39 • X. Administration Non-Conforming Uses/Structures 40 Appeals Enforcement Severability Powers I • I I 1 i CHAPTER 1 1.010 PURPOSE: The purpose of this chapter is to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by establishing II provisions to classify, protect, and preserve Bremerton's critical areas; by providing standards to manage development in association with these areas; and by designating some of these areas as environmentally sensitive in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). 1 1.020 INTENT: Critical areas include critical aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, flood hazard areas, geologically hazardous areas, stream corridors, wetlands, and any buffer zones. These critical areas serve many important ecological functions. Many of the critical areas in Bremerton have been lost or degraded through past development. Bremerton, as an urban growth I area, is experiencing increasing growth and its land resource is diminishing. This increasing growth and diminishing land resource is creating pressure for the development of critical areas. New construction technology is also creating pressure on these sites by making development feasible on I sites where it was formerly impractical to build. Because of the ecological benefits of critical areas,their past destruction, and the increasing pressure to develop them, the intent of this chapter is to ensure that the City's remaining critical I areas are preserved and protected and that development in or adjacent to these areas is managed. This chapter contains classification criteria and preservation standards for each type of critical area. The classification criteria identify physical characteristics by which critical areas are designated. The I preservation standards are provisions designed to protect critical areas from degradation caused by improper development. These criteria and standards will secure the public health, safety and welfare by: 1 1. Reducing risk of damage due to erosion, flooding, and land slides; 2. Reducing the risks to the public from personal injury, loss of life, or property damage; 3. Maintaining surface water quality and protecting groundwater areas which help recharge I (purify or resupply) rivers, streams, and aquifers; 4. Maintaining and protecting priority fish and wildlife habitats; 5. Providing open space and aesthetic value; I 6. Providing migratory pathways for fish and birds; 7. Providing unique urban wilds that serve as natural laboratories for schools and the general public; I 8. Avoiding public expenditures to correct damaged or degraded critical ecosystems; 9. Alerting appraisers, assessors, owners, potential buyers, or lessees to the potential presence of a critical ecosystem and possible development limitations; and I 10. Providing City officials with information, direction, and authority to protect ecosystems when evaluating development proposals. I I Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 IAs amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 1 I 1 I II CHAPTER V 1 1.090 FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION AREAS. 1 A. Classification: Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas are areas identified by the Washington Department of Wildlife as being of critical importance to the maintenance of fish and wildlife species. These areas may include other critical areas such as geologically I hazardous areas, stream corridors, wetlands, and these critical areas' associative buffers. 1. Potential fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas: Fish and wildlife habitat areas may include: 111 a. Lan containing priority habitats and species. b. All public and private tidelands or bedlands suitable for shellfish harvest, including any shellfish protection districts established pursuant to RCW I Chapter 90.72. The Washington Department of Health's classification system shall be used to classify commercial shellfish areas. c. Kelp and eelgrass beds and herring and smelt spawning areas. Kelp and I eelgrass beds may be classified and identified by the Washington Department of Natural Resources Aquatic Lands Program and the Washington Department of Ecology. Locations are compiled in the Puget Sound Environmental Atlas, Volumes 1 and 2. Herring and smelt spawning times I and locations are outlined in WAC 220-110, Hydraulic Code Rules and the Puget `Sound Environmental Atlas_ d. Natural ponds under 20 acres and their submerged aquatic beds that provide I critical fish or wildlife habitat. e. Waters of the state, which are defined in WAC Title 222, Forest Practices Rules and Regulations. Waters of the state must be classified using the I system in WAC 222-16-030. In classifying waters of the state as fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas the following may be considered: (1) Species present which are endangered, threatened, sensitive or i (2) priority; Species present which are sensitive to habitat manipulation; (3) Historic presence of priority species; I (4) Existing surrounding land uses that are incompatible with salmonid habitat; (5) Presence and size of riparian ecosystem; I (6) Existing water rights; and (7) The intermittent nature of some of the higher classes of waters of the state. f. Lakes, ponds, streams and rivers planted with game fish, including those planted under the auspices of a federal, state, local or tribal program and waters which support priority fish species as identified by the Washington Department of Wildlife. I I Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 IAs amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 10 I I i g. State natural area preserves and natural resource conservation areas, which .1 are defined, established, and managed by the Washington Department of Natural Resources. 2. Minimum fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas: Any property meeting the requirements of subparagraphs a through g above may be classified as a fish and I wildlife habitat conservation area. At a minimum, all property meeting any of the following characteristics will be classified as a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area: I a. Lands containing endangered or threatened species or habitats for endangered or threatened species; and b. Streams containing salmonids. I B. Standards: Alteration of fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas may. reduce the likelihood that the species will survive or reproduce. Activities allowed in fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas shall be consistent with the species located there and all I applicable state and federal regulations regarding that species. Many of these marine habitats are regulated by the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program and the Washington Department of Fisheries Hydraulic Permit process. The Critical Areas ordinance is II designed to address fish and wildlife habitat areas not previously addressed by the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program, the Fisheries Hydraulic Permit or other regulatory program. In determining allowable activities, the provisions of the Washington Department I of Wildlife's Management Recommendations for Washington Priority Habitatsand_Species shall be reviewed. Development in these areas shall be in accordance with the requirements of the underlying zone and any overlapping critical area classification. I 1 I 1111 V I I . r Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 IAs amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 11 1 CHAPTER VIE I r 1.120 WETLANDS AND STREAM CORRIDORS: Sections 1.130 through 1.280 apply to wetlands and stream corridors only. 1.130 WETLANDS & STREAM CORRIDORS — II APPLICABILITY. This chapter does not apply to wetlands or streams waterward of the ordinary high water mark of any body of water regulated by the Shoreline Management Act. 1.140 CLASSIFICATION. A. General: A wetland or stream classification shall be established based upon the completion of a delineation report to determine boundary, size, function, and value. Guidelines for preparing stream corridor and wetland delineation reports are defined in Section 1.150.0 and the "Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands" (1989). B. Streams shall be classified type4 an in accordance with the following criteria: 1. Type I streams: Those streams inventoried as shorelines of the state and regulated by the Shoreline Master Program of the City of Bremerton and the state Shoreline Management Act. 2. Type II streams: Those streams which are smaller than type I streams and flow 1 year round during periods of normal rainfall. Streams used by salmonids and/or have significant salmonid habitat whether flowing year-round or intermittent. Streams which flow directly into streams that are used by salmonids or have significant salmonid habitat whether flowing year-round or intermittent, are type II streams. 3. Type III streams: Those streams that are intermittent or ephemeral during years of normal rainfall and are not used by salmonids and do not have significant salmonid habitat or flow directly into streams used by salmonids or which have significant salmonid habitat. C. Wetlands shall be classified type I, II, III and IV, in accordance with the following criteria from the Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington developed by the Washington Department of Ecology. The Washington Depai talent of Ecology has developed a methodology for rating wetlands under this rating system. That methodology shall be used in rating wetlands under this chapter. It is contained in Washington Department of Ecology Publication Number 91-57 (October.1991),; 1. Type I wetlands are wetlands categorized as meeting one of the following: 1 Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 As amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 18 I ia. Documented habitat recognized by federal or state agencies for threatened or endangered species of plant or possibly extinct or extirpated plant, animal I or fish; b. Documented high-quality Natural Heritage wetland sites or high-quality 1 native wetland communities which qualify as a Natural Heritage wetland site; I c. Documented habitat of regional (Pacific coast) or national significance for migratory birds; • d. Regionally rare wetland communities with irreplaceable ecological functions, induding,but not limited to, sphagnum bogs and fens, estuarine wetlands, or mature forested swamps; or e. Wetlands of exceptional local significance. The criteria for identifying these I wetlands may include, but not be limited to, rarity, groundwater recharge areas, significant habitats, unique educational sites, or area where plant associations of infrequent occurrence such as high and low salt marsh systems, bogs or coniferous forested wetlands occurring on organic soils. I - --- --_- - "--2.----- - Type II wetlands are categorized as meeting one of the following: a. Documented habitat for sensitive species of plant, animal or fish recognized I by federal or state agencies; b. Wetlands with documented priority habitats or species recognized by state agencies; c. Wetlands with significant functions which may not be adequately replicated through creation or restoration; or d. Regulated wetlands with significant habitat value based on diversity and size; or I e. Regulated wetlands contiguous with salmonid fish-bearing waters, including streams where flow is intermittent; or f. Regulated wetlands with significant use by fish and wildlife; or I g. Wetlands equal to or greater than one acre in size and having three or more wetland classes; or 3. Type III wetlands are defined as those wetlands that do not contain features I 4. outlined in type I, II or IV. _ Type IV wetlands are defined as those hydrologically isolated wetlands that do not meet the criteria of a type I or II wetland and are: I a. Equal to or less than one acre in size, have only one wetland class and have only one dominant plant species (monotypic vegetation) or b. Equal to or less than two acres in size, have only one wetland class and a predominance of exotic species. . 1.150 REVIEW PROCESS. I A. Overview: Application for a wetland or stream assessment, delineation or permit by one or more property owners or applicants shall be made to the Department of Community Development. The Department of Community Development may utilize information from I I Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 IAs amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 19 I I I granted if it has been demonstrated that no adverse impact to a wetland will occur and a 1 minimum buffer width will be provided in accordance with this section. The buffer shall be measured from the upland edge of the wetland or stream and shall consist of an area of natural, enhanced or new native vegetation. B. Minimum Requirement: I1. Wetlands: (a) Wetland buffer widths shall be established as follows, based on wetland classification: IType I 200 feet Type II 100 feet Type III 50 feet IType IV 25 feet (b) Modification: For Type III and Type IV wetlands and buffers for a Type III and Type IV wetlands, the applicant may request a modification of the requirements of this section using the Review Process described in Section 150 of this Chapter. In addition to the application material required in Sec1 , p I specialisttion ,.150and fund the aapplirevcantiew ofshallthissubmreitporta byreport the Citypre's wearedtlandbya specwetlialistand consultant, except that a modification necessary for the construction of a single family residence shall not be required to fund an independent review I by the City's wetland consultant. This report must contain an assessment of the habitat, water quality purification and enhancement, storm water detention, ground water recharge, shoreline protection, and erosion I protection functions of the wetland and/or buffer and the effect on those functions caused by the proposed improvement or land surface modificationv The Director of Community Development may approve an improvement or land surface modification in a wetland or environmentally sensitive area I buffers for a wetland under this paragraph only if he/she finds that: (I). It will not adversely affect water quality; I (2). It will not destroy, nor damage, or disrupt a significant habitat area; g P gn , I (3). It will not have an adverse effect on drainage and/or storm water detention capabilities; 1 (4). It will not lead to unstable earth conditions or create erosion hazards; (5). It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area Iof the subject property or to the City as a whole; and (6). It will result in land surface modification of not more than one (1) IIacre, nor more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the wetland on the I Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 IAs amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 28 I I I subject property. 1 (7) Mitigation is provided as required in accordance with Section 1.270 2. Streams: Streams with riparian wetland habitats shall have the buffer widths which I apply to their wetland classification or the following buffer widths, whichever is more restrictive. a. Minimum buffer widths based on stream classification and the intensity of use and/or activity are: 1 (1) Type I streams: As set forth in the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program, or the same as type II streams below, whichever is greater. (2) " Type II streams: I (a) Streams used by salmonids and/or have significant salmonid habitat shall have a minimum 100-foot buffer. (b) High intensity uses/activities shall have a minimum 100-foot buffer. (c) Low intensity uses/activities shall have a minimum 50-foot buffer. (d) Streams which flow directly into streams that are used by _ salmonids or have significant salmonid habitat shall have a minimum 50-foot buffer. (3) Type III streams: A minimum 25-foot buffer. b. For streams with banks within 25 feet of the toe of slopes which are 25 percent or greater, the required buffer width shall be the minimum buffer I width for that stream type or a buffer width which extends 25 feet beyond the top of the slope, whichever setback provides the maximum buffer. C. Buffer areas or buffer widths may be modified, on a case-by-case basis, by averaging, decreasing or increasing widths under the following conditions. In making determinations I concerning the modification of buffers, the Director shall consider the relationship between the size in area of the buffers on site and the size in area of the wetlands or streams on site. 1. Averaging shall be allowed only where the following is demonstrated: I a. Variations in sensitivity exist because of physical characteristics; b. The least intense land use will be adjacent to reduced buffer width; c. Width averaging will not adversely impact wetland function or value; and I d. Total area contained within the averaged buffer is equal to the minimum required within the standard buffer zone. I However, in no instance shall the buffer be reduced by more than 50 percent for a wetland or stream, or be less than 25 feet for a wetland or ten feet for a stream. 2. The Director may require increased buffer widths if a larger buffer is necessary to I protect the stream or wetland. The determination that an increased buffer width is required shall be based on the following: a. Streams: Increased buffer widths to protect streams shall be based on, but • IInot limited to, the following circumstances: I Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 I - - As amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 29 1 I I (1) The development proposal will potentially produce significant noise, I light or glare or involves the production, use, storage or sale of hazardous material; (2) The stream serves as a critical fish habitat for spawning or rearing; I (3) The stream and/or its riparian habitat is utilized by species classified as endangered, threatened or sensitive; (4) The land adjacent to the stream is classified as a potential landslide I or erosion hazard area; (5) The adjacent riparian system has highly infiltrative soils that help to recharge/purify groundwater supply to the stream,or is characterized I - by till soil where runoff will increase significantly if vegetation is removed; (6) The adjacent riparian system helps to reduce storm water runoff or I controls sediment flow; or (7) A low-intensity activity or utility easement is a proposed use of the buffer. b. Wetlands: Increased buffer widths to protect wetlands shall be based on, but I not limited to, the following circumstances: (1) Wider bufferis needed to preserve viable populations of existing species; or I (2) Adjacent land has minimal vegetative cover or has a slope greater than 15 percent. 3. Buffer widths may also be decreased where it can be demonstrated that: I a. Adjacent land is extensively vegetated and is less than 15 percent slope; or b. . Project includes a buffer enhancement plan utilizing native wetland vegetation which substantiates that the proposed enhancement will improve the functions I c. of the buffer; and No direct or indirect short-term or long-term adverse impacts to the wetland or stream willresult. In no instance shall a buffer be reduced by more than 25 percent, or be less than I 25 feet for a wetland or ten feet for a stream. D. Low-impact uses and activities consistent with the stream or wetland buffer function may be permitted within the buffer depending upon the sensitivity of wetland and intensity of I activity or use_ These may include pedestrian trails,viewing platforms, utility easements and storm water management facilities such as grass-lined swales. E. Yard Reduction: In order to accommodate for the required buffer zone the Director may Ireduce the front and/or rear yard setback requirements_ on individual lots. The front and/or rear yard shall not be reduced by more than 50 Percent. In determining whether - or not to allow the yard reduction, the Director shall consider the impacts of the reduction Ion adjacent land uses. 1.240 STANDARDS. I I I Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 As amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 30 1 I I A. Wetlands: 1. Type I wetlands: No regulated activities shall be permitted within the wetland boundary or buffer except where the applicant can demonstrate an extraordinary hardship in accordance with Section 1.250 and mitigation is provided in accordance I with section 1.270 hereof. However, those low-intensity uses or activities necessary for public access, educational or research purposes may be allowed within the wetland buffer if it can be demonstrated that there will be no adverse impact on the I 2. wetland ecosystem. Type II wetlands: No regulated activities shall be allowed within the wetland boundary or buffer unless the applicant can demonstrate: I a. The application of these standards presents an extraordinary hardship in accordance with Section 1.250 hereof; or b. The proposal is in the public interest in accordance with Section 1.260 hereof. c. Mitigation is provided in accordance with section 1.270 hereof. I 3. Type III and IV wetlands: No regulated activities shall be allowed within the wetland boundary or buffer unless the applicant can demonstrate as follows: a. The application of these standards presents an extraordinary hardship in Iaccordance with Section 1.250 hereof; or b. The proposal is in the public interest in accordance with Section 1.260 hereof; or c. In addition to the application material required in Section 1.150, the applicant shall submit a report prepared by a wetland specialist, and fund a review of this report by the City's wetland specialist consultant, except that I a modification necessary for the construction of a single family residence shall not be required to fund an independent review by the City's wetland consultant. This report must contain an assessment of the habitat, water quality purification and enhancement, storm water detention, ground water recharge, shoreline protection, and erosion protection functions of the. wetland and/or buffer for the wetland and the effect on those functions caused by the proposed improvement or land surface modification. The I Director of Community Development may approve an improvement or land surface modification in a wetland or environmentally sensitive area buffers for a wetland under this paragraph only if he/she finds that: I (1). It will not adversely affect water quality; I (2). It will not destroy, nor damage, or disrupt a significant habitat area; (3). It will not have an adverse effect on drainage and/or storm water I. detention capabilities; l (4). It will not lead to unstable earth conditions or create erosion hazards; I I I Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 As amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 31 I I I (5). It will not be materially detrimental to any other property in the area Iof the subject property or to the City as a whole; and (6). It will result in land surface modification of no more than one (1) I acre, nor more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the wetland on the subject property; and (7) Mitigation is provided as required in accordance with Section 1.270 1 4. For all wetland types, the applicant must demonstrate the following: a. The existence of plant or wildlife species appearing on the federal or state - endangered or threatened species list will not be-jeopardized; I b. The proposal will not lead to significant degradation of groundwater or surface water quality; and - c. The proposal complies with the remaining standards of this chapter, which I include those pertaining to wetland compensation and the provision of bonds. 5. H drologicall isolated type III and IV wetlands which have been classified and identf ed as having a total cumulative area of less than 1,000 square fee regardless of property lines, are exempt from the provisions of this—chapter. 6. Unless the wetland is determined to_have exceptional value, the Director shell exclude typeIII wetlands less than 2,500`:square feet and type IV wetlands less than I 10,000 square feet from the provisions of this chapter, provided the applicant --.. provides monetary compensation':to mitigate for such wetland loss. These monies shall be held in a designated mitigation fund to meet the City's intent of no net loss I in wetland function. Such funds shall be used in future wetland creation, - restoration and/or enhancement projects or acquisition of wetland sites for public purposes. Such monetary compensation shall be based on the area of wetland loss on a square foot per square foot basis. This monetary compensation value shall be based upon the price of land acquisition plus 125 percent of the amount that would be required to perform off-site, in-kind compensation in accordance with the replacement guidelines set forth in Section 1.270.B.1 hereof and monitoring I requirements in Section 1.270.E hereof. Dedication of land containing wetlands_or _ streams may substitute for monetary compensiy aton,but only to the extent that such dedication would provide the City with increased value because of access, control and protection provided by public ownership or to the extent that such dedicated I land would be developable under the provisions of this chapter. Provisions for access must be included with any dedication of land. B. 4 Stream orridors: 1. Type I streams: All proposed alterations of these areas shall be in accordance with the Shoreline Master Program of the City of Bremerton, and all applicable state and I federal regulations. All proposed alterations in the riparian corridor of a type I stream shall be in accordance with the standards for the specific wetland type. 2. Type U streams may be altered for bridge crossings, trails, utility relocations, embankment stabilization, storm drainage way maintenance, and facilities for 1 I Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 IAs amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 32 I _ I surface water management. Such alterations may be permitted by the Director, provided: 1 a. Where riparian habitats exist, activity or use shall be allowed in accordance with the intensity of use and wetland classification and standards; b. The applicant can demonstrate: I (1) The application of these standards presents an extraordinary hardship in accordance with Section 1.250 hereof, or (2) The proposal is in the public interest in accordance with Section 1.260 I hereof; and c. Adverse impacts will be mitigated. 3. Type II streams may be_relocated or placed in,culverts; provided it can be I demonstrated that: a. necessary to allow a reasonable economic use; d. No significant habitat area will be destroyed; • e. The new channel or culvert is designed and installed to allow passage of fish inhabiting or using the stream; f. The channel or culvert is large enough to accommodate a 100-year storm; I g. The applicant will, at all times, keep the channel or culvert free of debris and sediment to allow free passage of water and/or fish; and h. The applicant will provide a bond or other financial security to ensure I maintenance as provided in Section 1.280 hereof. 4. ;'Type III streams may be relocated or placed in culverts, provided it can be demonstrated that: a. No significant habitat area will be destroyed; I b. The new channel or culvert is designed and installed to allow passage of fish inhabiting or using the stream; c. . The channel or culvert is large enough to accommodate a 100-year I storm; d. The applicant will, at all times, keep the channel or culvert free of debris and sediment to allow free passage of water and/or fish; and I e. The applicant will provide a bond or other financial security to ensure maintenance as provided in Section 1.280 hereof. f. The relocated stream channel will result in improved stream function I 5. and value In the event stream corridor alterations or relocations , as specified in Subparagraphs and 3)above, are allowed, the applicant] hall.isubmit an alteration I or relocation plan prepared by a wetlands specialist with expertise in this area. The plan shall address the following information: a. Creation of natural meander patterns and gentle side slope formations; b. Creation of narrow subchannel, where feasible, against the south or west Ibank; c. Provisions for the use of native vegetation; d. Creation, restoration or enhancement of fish spawning and nesting areas; I Bremerton Critical Lands Ordinance, Ord. No 4422 IAs amended by Ord. No. 4476, 7/13/94 Page 33 1 `® WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF 14 DOUG SUTHERLAND Natural Resources Commissioner of Public Lands IIIW I December 27, 2005 I Jonathan Kemp EnCo Environmental Corporation IPO Box 731747 Puyallup WA 98373 Proposed West Hills Residential Development,SUBJECT: p p , Bremerton I (T24N ROlE S21,28,29) We've searched the Natural Heritage Information System for information on significant natural I features in your project area. Currently, we have no records for rare plants or high quality native ecosystems in the vicinity of your project. X The information provided by the Washington Natural Heritage Program is based solely on existing information in the database. In the absence of field inventories, we cannot state whether or not a given site contains high quality ecosystems or rare plant species; there may be significant Inatural features in your study area of which we are not aware. The Washington Natural Heritage Program is responsible for information on the state's rare I plants as well as high quality ecosystems. For information on animal species of concern, please contact Priority Habitats and Species, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 600 Capitol Way N, Olympia WA 98501-1091, or by phone (360) 902-2543. I Please visit our internet website at nr.wa. ov htt ://www.d /nh for more information. Lists of rare p g P plants and their status, rare plant fact sheets, as well as rare plant survey guidelines are available for download from the site. Please feel free to call me at (360) 902-1667 if you have any questions, or by e-mail at sandra.moody@wadnr.gov. ISincerely, 16614/46/d- cc611)--17)451 Sandy Swope Moody, Environmental Review Coordinator IWashington Natural Heritage Program MAsset Management&Protection Division,PO Box 47014, Olympia WA 98504-7014 FAX 360-902-1789 I I 1111 WASHINGTON ST SE I PO BOX 47000 I OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7000 TEL:(360)902-1000 I FAX:(360)902-1775 I TTY:(360)902-1125 1 5'-a Equal Opportunity Employer RECYCLED PAPER 0 # STA 7-€ Ps di .t O� 3••. y0 4:I 7ede ac State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Mailing Address: 600 Capitol Way N•Olympia,WA 98501-1091 •(360)902-2200,TDD(360)902-2207 Main Office Location: Natural Resources Building• 1111 Washington Street SE•Olympia,WA Date: DEC 0 7 2005 Dear Habitats and Species Requester. Enclosed are the habitats and species products you requested from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). This package may also contain documentation to help you understand and use these products. These products only include information that WDFW maintains in a computer database. They are not an attempt to provide you with an official agency response as to the impacts of your project on fish and wildlife, nor are they designed to provide you with guidance on interpreting this information and determining how to proceed in consideration of fish and wildlife. These products only document the location of important fish and wildlife resources to the best of our knowledge. It is important to note that habitats or species may occur on the ground in areas not currently known to WDFW biologists, or in areas for which comprehensive surveys have not been conducted. Site-specific surveys are frequently necessary to rule out the presence of priority habitats or species. Your project may require further field inspection or you may need to contact our field biologists or others in WDFW to assist you in interpreting and applying this information. Generally, for assistance on a specific project, you should contact the WDFW Habitat Program Manager for your county and ask for the area habitat biologist for your project area. Refer to the enclosed directory for those contacts. Please note that sections potentially impacted by spotted owl management concerns are displayed on the 1:24,000 scale standard map products. If specific details on spotted owl site centers are required they must be requested separately. 1 These products are designed for users external to the forest practice permit process and as such, does not reflect all the information pertinent to forest practice review. The Forest Practice Rules adopted August 22, 1997 by the Forest Practice Board and administered by the Washington Department of Natural Resources require forest practice applications to be screened against marbled murrelet detection areas and detection sections. Marbled murrelet detection locations are included in the standard priority habitats and species products, but the detection areas and detection sections are not included. If your project is affected by Forest Practice Regulations, you should specially request murrelet detection areas. WDFW updates this information as additional data become available. Because fish and wildlife species are mobile and because habitats and species information changes, project reviews for fish and wildlife should not rest solely on mapped information. Instead, they should also consider new information gathered from current field investigations. Remember, habitats and species information can only show that a species or habitat type is present, they cannot show that a species or habitat type is not present. These products should not be used for future projects. Please obtain updates rather than use outdated information. 111 -Joy-) WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE - HABITATS AND SPECIES REPORT IN THE VICINITY OF T24R01E SECTION 21 Report Date: December 06, 2005 • Information About Priority Habitats and Species Polygons Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) polygons are labeled with a unique number and "+" symbol, roughly in the ' 6 center of the polygon on the map. This PHS Poly number refers to a list of form numbers and species and habitat codes contained in the PHS Polygon Cross Reference Report (listed below) . The form numbers refer to the attached PHS Polygon Report. This report details each species or habitat depicted as a polygon on the map. For a complete description of the codes used in this report please refer to the Fish and Wildlife Map Products document. 1 This document may be viewed on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/release.htm. Priority Habitats and Species Polygon - Summary Habitat and Species List: This report and the accompanying maps may contain some species or habitats that are not considered priority by the agency. YES under the "PHS" column in the table below indicates that the species is considered a priority and is on the Priority Habitats and Species List and/or the Species of Concern List. NO under the "PHS" column indicates the species/habitat is not considered an agency priority. State PHS Status PHS Code Common Name Species Use Species Use Description 1 YES SHBI SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATIONS RC REGULAR CONCENTRATION YES WAFO WATERFOWL CONCENTRATIONS RLC REGULAR LARGE CONCENTRATION YES WET WETLANDS Priority Habitats and Species Polygon Cross Reference Report: Form number 900000 indicates presence of PHS is unknown or the area was not mapped. Form numbers 909998, 909997, or 909996 indicate compilation errors. IIPHS Poly# Form# PHS Code*Species Use 2 900000 *- 3 904451 WET*- II 4 902414 WAFO*RLC- 5 900000 *- 6 902371 SHBI*RC- 7 902371-902414 SHBI*RC-WAFO*RLC- IInformation About Wildlife Heritage Point Report Wildlife Heritage points on the map can be referenced to this report by noting the quadpt number where the point occurs on the map, and then looking up the information listed below. This report is sorted by the quadpt I/ number and provides details on each species depicted on the map. For a complete description of the codes used in this report, please refer to the Fish and Wildlife Map Products document. This document may be viewed on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/release.htm. IIWildlife Heritage Point - Summary Species List: This report and the accompanying maps may contain some species or habitats that are not considered priority by the agency. YES under the "PHS" column in the table below indicates that the species is considered a priority and is on the Priority Habitats and Species List and/or the Species of Concern List. NO under the "PHS" column indicates the species/habitat is not considered an agency priority. State Species PHS Status Code Common Name Species Use Species Use Description YES SM ARHE GREAT BLUE HERON B BREEDING OCCURRENCE II YES ST HALE BALD EAGLE B BREEDING OCCURRENCE YES ORPI MOUNTAIN QUAIL IO INDIVIDUAL OCCURRENCE YES SC PRSU PURPLE MARTIN ART ARTIFICIAL NEST STRUCTURE YES SC PRSU PURPLE MARTIN BOX NEST BOX Wildlife Heritage Point Report: Quadpt#: 4712256005 Species Code: ARHE Species Use: B Common Name: GREAT BLUE HERON Year: 1996 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: ARDEA HERODIAS 1 State Status: SM Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range Section: T24N ROlE S35 NWOFNW Occurrence#: 197 Sequence#: 1 General Description: GREAT BLUE HERON COLONY IN ALDERS & MAPLES 200 FT N OF MELCHER ST, IN 2 CLUSTERS 200 FT APART (99); 8 NESTS IN ALDERS-88; 19 NESTS-89; 19 ACTIVE -92 JENSEN UW; 94: 33 NESTS; 96:MIN 17 NESTS; 1999: 25 NESTS SOUTH, 8 NESTS NORTH INACTIVE Quadpt#: 4712256005 Species Code: ORPI Species Use: IO Common Name: MOUNTAIN QUAIL Year: 1993 Class: GA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: OREORTYX PICTUS State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S35 NWOFNW Occurrence#: 170 Sequence#: 1 I/ General Description: MOUNTAIN QUAIL: UNKNOWN NUMBER SEEN BY PORT ORCHARD Quadpt#: 4712256010 Species Code: PRSU Species Use: BOX Common Name: PURPLE MARTIN 1 Year: 1998 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: PROGNE SUBIS State Status: SC Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range Section: T24N ROlE S23 NWOFSW Occurrence#: 55 Sequence#: 1 I General Description: PURPLE MARTIN. 1-2 PRS NESTING IN INACTIVE NAVY FLEET, PIERS D & E DURING 86 & 87.19870700 LOVE, B.R. POULSBO; 1998: NESTING IN SHIPRYARD, NOT NESTING IN MARTIN BOXES. . Quadpt#: 4712256011 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Common Name: BALD EAGLE Year: 2005 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS State Status: ST Federal Status: FT Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE SO8 SEOFSE Occurrence#: 142 Sequence#: 1 ' General Description: BALD EAGLE. KITSAP LAKE TERR: NEST ON TOP OF LARGE DOUG FIR NE OF LAKE. Quadpt#: 4712256029 Species Code: PRSU Species Use: ART Common Name: PURPLE MARTIN Year: 1998 Class: AA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: PROGNE SUBIS I State Status: SC Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township Range Section: T24N ROlE 810 SWOFSE Occurrence#: 84 Sequence#: 1 General Description: PURPLE MARTIN NEST BOXES AT HEAD OF PHINNEY BAY, NEAR 3415 NW PHINNEY BAY. NO NESTING REPORTED. 1 Quadpt#: 4712256033 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Common Name: BALD EAGLE Scientific Name:2005 Class: SA Accuracy: C HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS State Status: ST Federal Status: FT Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S27 NWOFSW Occurrence#: 493 Sequence#: 1 II General Description: BALD EAGLE NEST, LOCATED IN A SQUASHED TOP TREE NEXT TO A TALLER DOUG FIR. ONE OF 2 TALL TREES ON S SIDE OF HWY 160, ON S SIDE OF SINCLAIR INLET. ICodes Used In Wildlife Heritage Point Report Quadpt# : A sequential number for a point based on a US Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle. ISpecies Code : Alphanumeric code which identifies the species. List of codes are available in the documentation. Species Use : Criteria that identifies how the area is used by the indicated species. List of codes are available in the documentation. IICommon Name : Common name of the species. Year : Year of the observation. Class : Code that separates animals into general groups. 11 AA = Artifical animal (e.g., nest platforms not used yet) . EA = Exotic animal. GA = Game animal. NA = No animal found after target specific survey completed. SA = Special animal (e.g., state listed and monitor species) . ST = Split territory. I/ ZA = Zapped animal. Site no longer supports original occurrence. Accuracy : Mapping accuracy of the site as determined by the individual doing the mapping. C = Accurate to within 1/4 mile radius and confirmed by a reliable source. IIG = Location known only to a general locality. N = Accurate to within one mile radius. U = Accurate to within 1/4 mile radius and unconfirmed by a reliable source. Scientific Name : Scientific name of the species. IState Status : State listing status of species. SE = State endangered. SC = State candidate. ST = State threatened. SM = State monitor. SS = State sensitive. IIFederal Status : Federal listing status of species. FE = Federal endangered. FC = Federal candidate. FT = Federal threatened. FCo = Federal concern. Priority : Species and habitats that are considered to be priorities for conservation and management by Washington IIDepartment of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) . For a copy of the most current Priority Habitats and Species List contact WDFW PHS Section at (360)902-2543, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm. YES = Indicates that the species is considered a WDFW priority and is on the Priority Habitat and Species List and/or Species of Concern List. NO = Indicates that the species is not a WDFW priority. I/ WDFW Region : This contains the WDFW administrative region number 1 through 6. Verified : Verification code for an observation. V = Verified by a reliable source, generally WDFW or other agency biologist. IIU = Not verified by a reliable source, or identification of species is uncertain. 1 = Confirmed grizzly bear or wolf observation. 2 = Probable grizzly bear or wolf observation. Township - Range - Section : The legal description of the species occurrence. I/ Occurrence# : An ascension catalog number that combined with sequence number identifies a unique record within a species. Sequence# : Occurrences with multiple locations of a species. IIGeneral Description : Description of location of a species. 111 Priority Habitats and Species Polygon Report I . Form#: 902371 PHS Code: SHBI Species Use: RC Common Name: SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATIONS Season: SU Definition: 6 Accuracy: 1 Scientific Name: II State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name: GORST AQUATIC PRESERVE General Description: SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATION AREA. I/ Source: FOX, RON-WDW Source Date: 90 Source Code: PROF Synopsis: I/ Form#: 902414 PHS Code: WAFO Species Use: RLC Common Name: WATERFOWL CONCENTRATIONS Season:W Definition: 6 Accuracy: 1 Scientific Name: II State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name: DYES & SINCLAIR INLET General Description: WATERFOWL WINTERING SITE I Source: WDW DIVING DUCK SURVEYS Source Date: 01 91 Source Code: WTRAN Synopsis: WIDGEON AND MALLARDS OBSERVED PRIMARILY AT MOUTN OF INLET STREEAMS. GOLDENEYE AN D BUFFLEHEAD AT HIGH CONCENTRATION NEAR THE BRIDGE. Form#: 904451il PHS Code: WET Species Use: Common Name: WETLANDS Season: Definition: 6 Accuracy: 1 Scientific Name: State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name: REGION 6 SALTWATER WETLANDS IIGeneral Description: COASTAL SALT MARSHES SALT MEADOWS AND BRACKISH MARSHES Source: WASHINGTON STATE COASTAL ZONE ATLAS D.O.E., 1979 II Source Date: 04 78 Source Code: CZA Synopsis: D.O.E. SPONSORED MAPPING OF COASTAL FEATURES Codes Used In Priority Habitat and Species Polygon Report Form# : Unique number that links the information in the reports to features on the map. PHS Code : This contains a code that identifies the fish and wildlife species found in the area or the habitat IIthat occurs there. List of codes are available in the documentation. Species Use : Criteria that identifies how the area is used by the indicated species. List of codes are available in the documentation. This field is not used if a habitat is described. I Common Name : Common name of the species or habitat. Season : Season of species use. Use is indicated by the presence of a non-blank character in one or more pos- tions or sub-strings of the field position. Position 1: W = Winter use. Position 2: S = Spring use. IIPosition 3: U = Summer use. Position 4: F = Fall use. Position 5: S = Severe winter use. Definition : Identifies the definitions or criteria used to classify the area as a priority. List of codes are available in the documentation. IIAccuracy : Mapping accuracy of the line delineation as determined by the mapper. 1 = Accurate within a 1/4 mile. 3 = Location known to within one mile. 2 = Accurate within a 1/2 mile. 4 = Location known to general locality only. IScientific Name : Scientific name of the species. State Status : State listing status of species. SE = State endangered. SC = State candidate. ST = State threatened. SM = State monitor. IISS = State sensitive. Federal Status : Federal listing status of species. FE = Federal endangered. FC = Federal candidate. FT = Federal threatened. FCo = Federal concern. I/ Priority : Species and habitats that are considered to be priorities for conservation and management by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) . For a copy of the most current Priority Habitats and Species List contact WDFW PHS Section at (360)902-2543, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm. YES = Indicates that the species is considered a WDFW priority and is on the Priority Habitat and Species List 1 and/or Species of Concern List. NO = Indicates that the species is not a WDFW priority. ISite Name : Name assigned to the area based generally on a local place name. General Description : Description about the area, including how it is used and why it is important. 1 , Source : Identifies and describes the source responsible for the information described on the form or drawn on the map. Single or multiple sources may be cited. Source Date : Date of source of information. 1, Source Code : Code identifying the source of information. Synopsis : Brief narrative describing content of source of information. I i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I II I 1 1 1 I WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PRIORITY FISH REPORT FROM THE WASHINGTON LAKES AND RIVERS INFORMATION SYSTEM (WLRIS) DATABASE FOR TOWNSHIP T24R01E, SECTION 21 II • Report Date: December 06, 2005 Information About The Fish Presence Report The fish information in this report only includes information that Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife II (WDFW) maintains in a central computer database. This information only documents the location of important fish resources to the best of our knowledge. It is not a complete inventory of the fish species in the state. Fish are identified as priority by WDFW if they meet one of three criterion as listed in the Priority Habitats and Species List. The list is available by contacting WDFW Priority Habitats and Species section at (360)902- 2543, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm. To insure appropriate use IIof this information users are encouraged to consult with WDFW biologists. Streams with presence of priority anadromous and resident fish species from the WLRIS database are highlighted on the accompanying map. Due to the complexity of displaying linear features individual species that utilize each river reach are not distinguishable. If more species specific information is needed, users should request IIindividual species maps, digital data, or contact the WLRIS database manager. State status information is not available in the WLRIS database for these species. Please see WDFW Species of Concern List for current status. For a copy of this list, contact WDFW Endangered Species Section at (360)902- 2515, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/w1m/diversty/soc/soc.htm. IIPriority Anadromous Fish Presence: Code Common Name Stream Name Stream LLID Record Date 11 CHFA Fall Chinook Heins Creek 1227133475309 03-11-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Heins Creek 1227133475309 04-04-05 CHMF Fall Chum Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-03-08 I COHO Coho Salmon Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Kitsap Creek 1227114475869 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Kitsap Creek 1227114475869 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Kitsap Creek 1227114475869 03-11-10 11 STWI Winter Steelhead Kitsap Creek 1227114475869 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 05-03-08 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226742475419 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226808475756 05-02-10 II CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1227104475308 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1226808475756 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1227104475308 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 05-02-10 Priority Resident Fish Presence: 11 Code Common Name Stream Name Stream LLID Record Date I CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226742475419 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226808475756 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1227104475308 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Heins Creek 1227133475309 04-12-08 11 RBT Rainbow Trout Kitsap Creek 1227114475869 04-10-05 Codes Used In The Fish Presence Report IICode : WDFW alphanumeric code that identifies the fish species. Common Name : Common name of the fish species. Stream Name : Stream name based on the US Geological Survey, Geographic Names Information System database. Stream LLID : Unique stream identifier (ID) generated from the node latitude and longitude located at a stream's mouth. This ID is to be construed only as an ID, and not necessarily as a reference to a stream's location. Record Date : Date the information was entered into the database. I 1 t i I WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE - HABITATS AND SPECIES REPORT IN THE VICINITY OF T24R01E SECTION 28 Report Date: December 06, 2005 II ti Information About Priority Habitats and Species Polygons Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) polygons are labeled with a unique number and "+" symbol, roughly in the IIcenter of the polygon on the map. This PHS Poly number refers to a list of form numbers and species and habitat codes contained in the PHS Polygon Cross Reference Report (listed below) . The form numbers refer to the attached PHS Polygon Report. This report details each species or habitat depicted as a polygon on the map. For a complete description of the codes used in this report please refer to the Fish and Wildlife Map Products document. This document may be viewed on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/release.htm. IIPriority Habitats and Species Polygon - Summary Habitat and Species List: This report and the accompanying maps may contain some species or habitats that are not considered priority by the agency. YES under the "PHS" column in the table below indicates that the species is considered a priority I/ and is on the Priority Habitats and Species List and/or the Species of Concern List. NO under the "PHS" column indicates the species/habitat is not considered an agency priority. State PHS Status PHS Code Common Name Species Use Species Use Description II YES SHBI SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATIONS RC REGULAR CONCENTRATION YES WAFO WATERFOWL CONCENTRATIONS RLC REGULAR LARGE CONCENTRATION YES WET ' WETLANDS IIPriority Habitats and Species Polygon Cross Reference Report: Form number'900000jindicates presence of PHS is unknown or the area was not mapped. Form numbers 909998, 909997, or 909996 indicate compilation errors. IIPHS Poly# Form# PHS Code*Species Use 2 900000 _—. 3 902414 WAFO*RLC- II 4 902371 SHBI*RC- 5 902371-902414 SHBI*RC-WAFO*RLC- 6 902371-902414-904451 SHBI*RC-WAFO*RLC-WET*- 7 902371-902414-904451 SHBI*RC-WAFO*RLC-WET*- Information About Wildlife Heritage Point Report Wildlife Heritage points on the map can be referenced to this report by noting the quadpt number where the point occurs on the map, and then looking up the information listed below. This report is sorted by the quadpt number and provides details on each species depicted on the map. For a complete description of the codes used IIin this report, please refer to the Fish and Wildlife Map Products document. This document may be viewed on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/release.htm. Wildlife Heritage Point - Summary Species List: This report and the accompanying maps may contain some species or habitats that are not considered priority by II the agency. YES under the "PHS"column in the table below indicates that the species is considered a priority and is on the Priority Habitats and Species List and/or the Species of Concern List. NO under the "PHS" column indicates the species/habitat is not considered an agency priority. State Species PHS Status Code Common Name Species Use Species Use Description YES SM ARHE GREAT BLUE HERON B BREEDING OCCURRENCE II YES ST HALE BALD EAGLE B BREEDING OCCURRENCE YES ORPI MOUNTAIN QUAIL IO INDIVIDUAL OCCURRENCE YES SC PRSU PURPLE MARTIN BOX NEST BOX Wildlife Heritage Point Report: I/ Quadpt#: 4712256005 Species Code: ARHE Species Use: B Common Name: GREAT BLUE HERON Year: 1996 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: ARDEA HERODIAS State Status: SM Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V I Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S35 NWOFNW Occurrence#: 197 Sequence#: 1 General Description: GREAT BLUE HERON COLONY IN ALDERS & MAPLES 200 FT N OF MELCHER ST, IN 2 CLUSTERS 200 FT APART (99) ; 8 NESTS IN ALDERS-88; 19 NESTS-89; 19 ACTIVE -92 JENSEN UW; 94: 33 NESTS; 96:MIN 17 NESTS; 1999: 25 NESTS SOUTH, 8 NESTS NORTH INACTIVE I Quadpt#: 4712256005 Species Code: ORPI Species Use: IO Common Name: MOUNTAIN QUAIL Year: 1993 Class: GA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: OREORTYX PICTUS State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S35 NWOFNW Occurrence#: 170 Sequence#: 1 General Description: MOUNTAIN QUAIL: UNKNOWN NUMBER SEEN BY PORT ORCHARD II Quadpt#: 4712256010 Species Code: PRSU Species Use: BOX Common Name: PURPLE MARTIN Year: 1998 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: PROGNE SUBIS II State Status: SC Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S23 NWOFSW Occurrence#: 55 Sequence#: 1 General Description: PURPLE MARTIN. 1-2 PRS NESTING IN INACTIVE NAVY FLEET, PIERS D & E DURING 86 & I 87.19870700 LOVE, B.R. POULSBO; 1998: NESTING IN SHIPRYARD, NOT NESTING IN MARTIN BOXES. • Quadpt#: 4712256031 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Common Name: BALD EAGLE Year: 2005 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS State Status: ST Federal Status: FT Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S33 NWOFSW Occurrence#: 1677 Sequence#: 1 General Description: BALD EAGLE NEST, SPLIT TERRITORY FROM SINCLAIR INLET TERR #493. BALD EAGLE NEST IN TRIPLE-TOPPED TREE 15 FT DOWN IN CROTCH BELOW FULL ROUNDED II TOP. TREE IS MOSTLY SURROUNDED BY HARDWOODS BUT SOME CONIFER TO NORTH. Quadpt#: 4712256033 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Common Name: BALD EAGLE Year: 2005 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS State Status: ST Federal Status: FT Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V I Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S27 NWOFSW Occurrence#: 493 Sequence#: 1 General Description: BALD EAGLE NEST, LOCATED IN A SQUASHED TOP TREE NEXT TO A TALLER DOUG FIR. ONE OF 2 TALL TREES ON S SIDE OF HWY 160, ON S SIDE OF SINCLAIR INLET. Quadpt#: 4712256035 Species Code: ARHE Species Use: B Common Name: GREAT BLUE HERON I/ Year: 2001 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: ARDEA HERODIAS State Status: SM Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S32 NEOFNE Occurrence#: 404 Sequence#: 1 General Description: GREAT BLUE HERON COLONY IN 7 DOUG-FIR NEST TREES. COLONY HAS BEEN AROUND FOR IIMANY YEARS. 3190 BARTOLATZ ROAD. I Codes Used In Wildlife Heritage Point Report a point based on a US Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle. Species Code : Alphanumeric code which identifies the species. List of codes are available in the documentation. IISpecies Use : Criteria that identifies how the area is used by the indicated species. List of codes are available in the documentation. Common Name : Common name of the species. Year : Year of the observation. 1 Class : Code that separates animals into general groups. AA = Artifical animal (e.g., nest platforms not used yet) . IIEA = Exotic animal. GA = Game animal. NA = No animal found after target specific survey completed. SA = Special animal (e.g., state listed and monitor species) . ST = Split territory. ZA = Zapped animal. Site no longer supports original occurrence. I/ Accuracy : Mapping accuracy of the site as determined by the individual doing the mapping. C = Accurate to within 1/4 mile radius and confirmed by a reliable source. G = Location known only to a general locality. N = Accurate to within one mile radius. IIU = Accurate to within 1/4 mile radius and unconfirmed by a reliable source. Scientific Name : Scientific name of the species. State Status : State listing status of species. SE = State endangered.I SC = State candidate. ST = State threatened. SM = State monitor. SS = State sensitive. Federal Status : Federal listing status of species. IIFE = Federal endangered. FC = Federal candidate. FT = Federal threatened. FCo = Federal concern. Priority : Species and habitats that are considered to be priorities for conservation and management by Washington I Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) . For a copy of the most current Priority Habitats and Species List contact WDFW PHS Section at (360)902-2543, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm. YES = Indicates that the species is considered a WDFW priority and is on the Priority Habitat and Species List and/or Species of Concern List. NO = Indicates that the species is not a WDFW priority. I WDFW Region : This contains the WDFW administrative region number 1 through 6. Verified : Verification code for an observation. V = Verified by a reliable source, generally WDFW or other agency biologist. U = Not verified by a reliable source, or identification of species is uncertain. 111 = Confirmed grizzly bear or wolf observation. 2 = Probable grizzly bear or wolf observation. Township - Range - Section : The legal description of the species occurrence. IIOccurrence# : An ascension catalog number that combined with sequence number identifies a unique record within a species. Sequence# : Occurrences with multiple locations of a species. General Description : Description of location of a species. I Priority Habitats and Species Polygon Report • II Form#: 902371 PHS Code: SHBI Species Use: RC Common Name: SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATIONS I Season: SU State Status: Definition: 6 Accuracy: 1 Scientific Name: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name: GORST AQUATIC PRESERVE General Description: SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATION AREA. I Source: FOX, RON-WDW Source Date: 90 Source Code: PROF Synopsis: I Form#: 902414 PHS Code: WAFO Species Use: RLC Common Name: WATERFOWL CONCENTRATIONS Season:W Definition: 6 Accuracy: 1 Scientific Name: II State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name: DYES & SINCLAIR INLET General Description: WATERFOWL WINTERING SITE I Source: WDW DIVING DUCK SURVEYS Source Date: 01 91 Source Code: WTRAN Synopsis: WIDGEON AND MALLARDS OBSERVED PRIMARILY AT MOUTN OF INLET STREEAMS. GOLDENEYE AN D BUFFLEHEAD AT HIGH CONCENTRATION NEAR THE BRIDGE. Form#: 904451II PHS Code: WET Species Use: Common Name: WETLANDS Season: Definition: 6 Accuracy: 1 Scientific Name: State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name: REGION 6 SALTWATER WETLANDS II General Description: COASTAL SALT MARSHES SALT MEADOWS AND BRACKISH MARSHES Source: WASHINGTON STATE COASTAL ZONE ATLAS D.O.E., 1979 I Source Date: 04 78 Source Code: CZA Synopsis: D.O.E. SPONSORED MAPPING OF COASTAL FEATURES Codes Used In Priority Habitat and Species Polygon Report Form# : Unique number that links the information in the reports to features on the map. PHS Code/ : This contains a code that identifies the fish and wildlife species found in the area or the habitat IIthat occurs there. List of codes are available in the documentation. Species Use : Criteria that identifies how the area is used by the indicated species. List of codes are available in the documentation. This field is not used if a habitat is described. Common Name : Common name of the species or habitat. I/ Season : Season of species use. Use is indicated by the presence of a non-blank character in one or more pos- tions or sub-strings of the field position. Position 1: W = Winter use. Position 2: S = Spring use. IIPosition 3: U = Summer use. Position 4: F = Fall use. Position 5: S = Severe winter use. Definition : Identifies the definitions or criteria used to classify the area as a priority. List of codes are available in the documentation. IIAccuracy : Mapping accuracy of the line delineation as determined by the mapper. 1 = Accurate within a 1/4 mile. 3 = Location known to within one mile. 2 = Accurate within a 1/2 mile. 4 = Location known to general locality only. IIScientific Name : Scientific name of the species. State Status : State listing status of species. SE = State endangered. SC = State candidate. ST = State threatened. SM = State monitor. IISS = State sensitive. Federal Status : Federal listing status of species. FE = Federal endangered. FC = Federal candidate. FT = Federal threatened. FCo = Federal concern. I/ Priority : Species and habitats that are considered to be priorities for conservation and management by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) . For a copy of the most current Priority Habitats and Species List contact , WDFW PHS Section at (360)902-2543, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm. YES = Indicates that the species is considered a WDFW priority and is on the Priority Habitat and Species List I and/or Species of Concern List. NO = Indicates that the species is not a WDFW priority. 111 Site Name : Name assigned to the area based generally on a local place name. General Description : Description about the area, including how it is used and why it is important. IISource : Identifies and describes the source responsible for the information described on the form or drawn on the map. Single or multiple sources may be cited. Source Date : Date of source of information. IISource Code : Code identifying the source of information. Synopsis : Brief narrative describing content of source of information. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 i 1 II I WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PRIORITY FISH REPORT FROM THE WASHINGTON LAKES AND RIVERS INFORMATION SYSTEM (WLRIS) DATABASE FOR TOWNSHIP T24R01E, SECTION 28' Report Date: December 06, 2005 Information About The Fish Presence Report The fish information in this report only includes information that Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife II (WDFW) maintains in a central computer database. This information only documents the location of important fish resources to the best of our knowledge. It is not a complete inventory of the fish species in the state. Fish are identified as priority by WDFW if they meet one of three criterion as listed in the Priority Habitats and Species List. The list is available by contacting WDFW Priority Habitats and Species section at (360)902- 2543, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm. To insure appropriate use I of this information users are encouraged to consult with WDFW biologists. Streams with presence of priority anadromous and resident fish species from the WLRIS database are highlighted on the accompanying map. Due to the complexity of displaying linear features individual species that utilize each river reach are not distinguishable. If more species specific information is needed, users should request II individual species maps, digital data, or contact the WLRIS database manager. State status information is not available in the WLRIS database for these species. Please see WDFW Species of Concern List for current status. For a copy of this list, contact WDFW Endangered Species Section at (360)902- 2515, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/diversty/soc/soc.htm. ' Priority Anadromous Fish Presence: Code Common Name Stream Name Stream LLID Record Date II CHMF Fall Chum Anderson Creek 1226818475280 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Anderson Creek 1226818475280 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Anderson Creek 1226818475280 05-02-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Gorst Creek 1226963475279 03-11-10 II CHFA Fall Chinook Gorst Creek 1226963475279 04-04-05 CHMF Fall Chum Gorst Creek 1226963475279 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Gorst Creek 1226963475279 05-03-08 COHO Coho Salmon Gorst Creek 1226963475279 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Gorst Creek 1226963475279 03-11-10 11 STWI Winter Steelhead Gorst Creek 1226963475279 05-02-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Heins Creek 1227133475309 03-11-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Heins Creek 1227133475309 04-04-05 CHMF Fall Chum Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-03-08 II COHO Coho Salmon Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Kitsap Creek 1227114475869 05-02-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Parish Creek 1227123475308 03-11-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Parish Creek 1227123475308 04-04-05 CHMF Fall Chum Parish Creek 1227123475308 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Parish Creek 1227123475308 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Parish Creek 1227123475308 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 05-03-08 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226571475290 05-02-10 II CHMF Fallch km Stream name(s) not in database 12267424754191 05-02-10 CHMF Fail Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226$24475230 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226919475271 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1227026475270 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1227104475308 05-02-10 II COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1226571475290 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1226824475230 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1226919475271 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1227026475270 05-02-10 II COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1227104475308 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Stream name(s) not in database 1226571475290 05-02-10 II Priority Resident Fish Presence: Code Common Name Stream Name Stream LLID Record Date CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226551475388 04-12-08 II CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226571475290 04-12-08 CCT Uiesident Cutthroat( Stream name(s) not in database E122674247541 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226808475756 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226824475230 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226919475271 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1227026475270 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1227104475308 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Anderson Creek 1226818475280 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Gorst Creek 1226963475279 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Heins Creek 1227133475309 04-12-08 IICCT Resident Cutthroat Parish Creek 1227123475308 04-12-08 Codes Used In The Fish Presence Report II Code : WDFW alphanumeric code that identifies the fish species. Common Name : Common name of the fish species. II ,Stream Name : Stream name based on the US Geological Survey, Geographic Names Information System database. Stream LLID : Unique stream identifier (ID) generated from the node latitude and longitude located at a stream's II .mouth. This ID is to be construed only as an ID, and not necessarily as a reference to a stream's location. 'Record Date : Date the information was entered into the database. II II II 1 . •I 1 I • II II II II II I II i III WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE - HABITAT$ VD SPECIES REPORT IN THE VICINITY OF T24R01E SECTION(29,7 Report Date: December 06, 2005 II Information About Priority Habitats and Species Polygons Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) polygons are labeled with a unique number and "+" symbol, roughly in the ' ,. center of the polygon on the map. This PHS Poly number refers to a list of form numbers and species and habitat IIcodes contained in the PHS Polygon Cross Reference Report (listed below) . The form numbers refer to the attached PHS Polygon Report. This report details each species or habitat depicted as a polygon on the map. For a complete description of the codes used in this report please refer to the Fish and Wildlife Map Products document. This document may be viewed on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/release.htm. IIPriority Habitats and Species Polygon - Summary Habitat and Species List: This report and the accompanying maps may contain some species or habitats that are not considered priority by the agency. YES under the "PHS" column in the table below indicates that the species is considered a priority IIand is on the Priority Habitats and Species List and/or the Species of Concern List. NO under the "PHS" column indicates the species/habitat is not considered an agency priority. State PHS Status PHS Code Common Name Species Use Species Use Description II YES SHBI SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATIONS RC REGULAR CONCENTRATION YES WAFO WATERFOWL CONCENTRATIONS RLC REGULAR LARGE CONCENTRATION YES WET WETLANDS IIPriority Habitats and Species Polygon Cross Reference Report: Form number 900000 indicates presence of PHS is unknown or the area was not mapped. Form numbers 909998, 909997, or 909996 indicate compilation errors. IIPHS Poly# Form# PHS Code*Species Use 2 900000 - 3 902371 SHBI*RC- II 4 902371-902414 SHBI*RC-WAFO*RLC 5 902414 WAFO*RLC- 6 902371 902414-904451 SHBI*RC-WAFO*RLC-WET*- 7 902371-902414-904451 SHBI*RC-WAFO*RLC-WET*- II Information About Wildlife Heritage Point Report Wildlife Heritage points on the map can be referenced to this report by noting the quadpt number where the point occurs on the map, and then looking up the information listed below. This report is sorted by the quadpt IInumber and provides details on each species depicted on the map. For a complete description of the codes used in this report, please refer to the Fish and Wildlife Map Products document. This document may be viewed on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/release.htm. Wildlife Heritage Point - Summary Species List: IIThis report and the accompanying maps may contain some species or habitats that are not considered priority by the agency. YES under the "PHS" column in the table below indicates that the species is considered a priority and is on the Priority Habitats and Species List and/or the Species of Concern List. NO under the "PHS" column indicates the species/habitat is not considered an agency priority. II State Species PHS Status Code Common Name Species Use Species Use Description YES SM ARHE GREAT BLUE HERON B BREEDING OCCURRENCE II YES ST HALE BALD EAGLE B BREEDING OCCURRENCE NO SM PAHA OSPREY B BREEDING OCCURRENCE Wildlife Heritage Point Report: IIQuadpt#: 4712256012 Species Code: PAHA Species Use: B Common Name: OSPREY Year: 1990 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: PANDION HALIAETUS State Status: SM Federal Status: Priority: NO WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S19 SEOFSE Occurrence#: 681 Sequence#: 1 II General Description: OSPREY NEST, NW CORNER OF ALEXANDER LAKE. Quadpt#: 4712256031 Species Code: HALE Species Use: B Common Name: BALD EAGLE II Year: 2005 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: HALIAEETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS State Status: ST Federal Status: FT Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V Township - Range Section: T24N ROlE S33 NWOFSW Occurrence#: 1677 Sequence#: 1 General Description: BALD EAGLE NEST, SPLIT TERRITORY FROM SINCLAIR INLET TEAR #493. BALD EAGLE NEST IN TRIPLE-TOPPED TREE 15 FT DOWN IN CROTCH BELOW FULL ROUNDED II TOP. TREE IS MOSTLY SURROUNDED BY HARDWOODS BUT SOME CONIFER TO NORTH. Quadpt#: 4712256035 Species Code: ARHE Species Use: B Common Name: GREAT BLUE HERON Year: 2001 Class: SA Accuracy: C Scientific Name: ARDEA HERODIAS State Status: SM Federal Status: Priority: YES WDFW Region: 6 Verified: V II Township - Range - Section: T24N ROlE S32 NEOFNE Occurrence#: 404 Sequence#: 1 General Description: GREAT BLUE HERON COLONY IN 7 DOUG-FIR NEST TREES. COLONY HAS BEEN AROUND FOR MANY YEARS. 3190 BARTOLATZ ROAD. II II • Codes Used In Wildlife Heritage Point Report Quadpt# : A sequential number for a point based on a US Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle. ,Species Code : Alphanumeric code which'identifies the species. List of codes are available in the documentation. IISpecies Use : Criteria thatidentifies how the area is used by the indicated species. List of codes are available in the documentation. Common Name : Common name of the species. IIYear : Year of the observation. Class : Code that separates animals into general groups. AA = Artifical animal (e.g., nest platforms not used yet) . IIEA = Exotic animal. GA = Game animal. NA = No animal found after target specific survey completed. SA = Special animal (e.g., state listed and monitor species) . ST = Split territory. IIZA = Zapped animal. Site no longer supports original occurrence. Accuracy : Mapping accuracy of the site as determined by the individual doing the mapping. C = Accurate to within 1/4 mile radius and confirmed by a reliable source. G = Location known only to a general locality. IIN = Accurate to within one mile radius. U = Accurate to within 1/4 mile radius and unconfirmed by a reliable source. Scientific Name : Scientific name of the species. IIState Status : State listing status of species. SE = State endangered. SC = State candidate. ST = State threatened. SM = State monitor. SS = State sensitive. Federal Status : Federal listing status of species. IIFE = Federal endangered. FC = Federal candidate. FT = Federal threatened. FCo = Federal concern. Priority : Species and habitats that are considered to be priorities for conservation and management by Washington IIDepartment of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) . For a copy of the most current Priority Habitats and Species List contact WDFW PHS Section at (360)902-2543, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm. YES = Indicates that the species is considered a WDFW priority and is on the Priority Habitat and Species List and/or Species of Concern List. NO = Indicates that the species is not a WDFW priority. IIWDFW Region : This contains the WDFW administrative region number 1 through 6. Verified : Verification code for an observation. V = Verified by a reliable source, generally WDFW or other agency biologist. U = Not verified by a reliable source, or identification of species is uncertain. II1 = Confirmed grizzly bear or wolf observation. 2 = Probable grizzly bear or wolf observation. Township - Range - Section : The legal description of the species occurrence. IIOccurrence# : An ascension catalog number that combined with sequence number identifies a unique record within a species. Sequence# : Occurrences with multiple locations of a species. IIGeneral Description : Description of location of a species. I II II II Priority Habitats and Species Polygon Report I . ; Form#: 902371 PHS Code: SHBI Species Use: RC Common Name: SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATIONS I Season: SU State Status: Definition: 6 Accuracy: 1 Scientific Name: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name: GORST AQUATIC PRESERVE • General Description: SHOREBIRD CONCENTRATION AREA. II Source: FOX, RON-WDW Source Date: 90 Source Code: PROF Synopsis: II Form#: 902414 PHS Code: WAFO Species Use: RLC Common Name: WATERFOWL CONCENTRATIONS Season:W Definition: 6 Accuracy: 1 Scientific Name: I State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name: DYES & SINCLAIR INLET General Description: WATERFOWL WINTERING SITE I Source: WDW DIVING DUCK SURVEYS Source Date: 01 91 Source Code: WTRAN Synopsis: WIDGEON AND MALLARDS OBSERVED PRIMARILY AT MOUTN OF INLET STREEAMS. GOLDENEYE AN D BUFFLEHEAD AT HIGH CONCENTRATION NEAR THE BRIDGE. IForm#: 904451 PHS Code: WET Species Use: Common Name: WETLANDS Season: Definition: 6 Accuracy: 1 Scientific Name: State Status: Federal Status: Priority: YES Site Name: REGION 6 SALTWATER WETLANDS II General Description: COASTAL SALT MARSHES SALT MEADOWS AND BRACKISH MARSHES Source: WASHINGTON STATE COASTAL ZONE ATLAS D.O.E., 1979 I Source Date: 04 78 Source Code: CZA Synopsis: D.O.E. SPONSORED MAPPING OF COASTAL FEATURES I Codes Used In Priority Habitat and Species Polygon Report Form# : Unique number that links the information in the reports to features on the map. PHS Code : This contains a code that identifies the fish and wildlife species found in the area or the habitat IIthat occurs there. List of codes are available in the documentation. Species Use : Criteria that identifies how the area is used by the indicated species. List of codes are available in the documentation. This field is not used if a habitat is described. IICommon Name : Common name of the species or habitat. Season : Season of species use. Use is indicated by the presence of a non-blank character in one or more pos- tions or sub-strings of the field position. IIPosition 1: W = Winter use. Position 2: S = Spring use. Position 3: U = Summer use. Position 4: F = Fall use. Position 5: S = Severe winter use. Definition : Identifies the definitions or criteria used to classify the area as a priority. List of codes are available in the documentation. IIAccuracy : Mapping accuracy of the line delineation as determined by the mapper. 1 = Accurate within a 1/4 mile. 3 = Location known to within one mile. 2 = Accurate within a 1/2 mile. 4 = Location known to general locality only. IIScientific Name : Scientific name of the species. State Status : State listing status of species. SE = State endangered. SC = State candidate. ST = State threatened. SM = State monitor. IISS = State sensitive. Federal Status : Federal listing status of species. FE = Federal endangered. FC = Federal candidate. FT = Federal threatened. FCo = Federal concern. IIPriority : Species and habitats that are considered to be priorities for conservation and management by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) . For a copy of the most current Priority Habitats and Species List contact WDFW PHS Section at (360)902-2543, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm. YES = Indicates that the species is considered a WDFW priority and is on the Priority Habitat and Species List IIand/or Species of Concern List. NO = Indicates that the species is not a WDFW priority. IISite Name : Name assigned to the area based generally on a local place name. General Description : Description about the area, including how it is used and why it is important. I .Source : Identifies and describes the source responsible for the information described on the form or drawn on the map. Single or multiple sources may be cited. Source Date : Date of source of information. II Source Code : Code identifying the source of information. Synopsis : Brief narrative describing content of source of information. II II I II 1 I/ I 1 II 1 I I II 1 II II II II WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PRIORITY FISH REPORT FROM THE WASHINGTON LAKES AND RIVERS INFORMATION SYSTEM (WLRIS) DATABASE FOR TOWNSHIP T24RO1E, SECTION 29 Report Date: December 06, 2005 Information About The Fish Presence Report The fish information in this report only includes information that Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife II (WDFW) maintains in a central computer database. This information only documents the location of important fish resources to the best of our knowledge. It is not a complete inventory of the fish species in the state. Fish are identified as priority by WDFW if they meet one of three criterion as listed in the Priority Habitats and Species List. The list is available by contacting WDFW Priority Habitats and Species section at (360)902- 2543, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/hab/phspage.htm. To insure appropriate use IIof this information users are encouraged to consult with WDFW biologists. Streams with presence of priority anadromous and resident fish species from the WLRIS database are highlighted on the accompanying map. Due to the complexity of displaying linear features individual species that utilize each river reach are not distinguishable. If more species specific information is needed, users should request I/ individual species maps, digital data, or contact the WLRIS database manager. State status information is not available in the WLRIS database for these species. Please see WDFW Species of Concern List for current status. For a copy of this list, contact WDFW Endangered Species Section at (360)902- 2515, or it is available on our web site at http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/w1m/diversty/soc/soc.htm. ' Priority Anadromous Fish Presence: Code Common Name Stream Name Stream LLID Record Date I CHMF Fall Chum Anderson Creek 1226818475280 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Anderson Creek 1226818475280 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Anderson Creek 1226818475280 05-02-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Gorst Creek 1226963475279 03-11-10 I CHFA Fall Chinook Gorst Creek 1226963475279 04-04-05 CHMF Fall Chum Gorst Creek 1226963475279 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Gorst Creek 1226963475279 05-03-08 COHO Coho Salmon Gorst Creek 1226963475279 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Gorst Creek 1226963475279 03-11-10 II STWI Winter Steelhead Gorst Creek 1226963475279 05-02-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Heins Creek 1227133475309 03-11-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Heins Creek 1227133475309 04-04-05 CHMF Fall Chum Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-03-08 II COHO Coho Salmon Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Heins Creek 1227133475309 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Kitsap Creek 1227114475869 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Kitsap Creek 1227114475869 05-02-10 CHFA Fall Chinook Parish Creek 1227123475308 03-11-10 I CHFA Fall Chinook Parish Creek 1227123475308 04-04-05 CHMF Fall Chum Parish Creek 1227123475308 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Parish Creek 1227123475308 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Parish Creek 1227123475308 05-02-10 CHMF Fall�. Chum-^ Stream name(s) not in database 1226742475419 05-02-10 CHMF FaT -MiliTi Stream name(s) not in database 1226824475230 05-02-10 II CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1226919475271 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1227026475270 05-02-10 CHMF Fall Chum Stream name(s) not in database 1227104475308 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1226824475230 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1226919475271 05-02-10 II COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1227026475270 05-02-10 COHO Coho Salmon Stream name(s) not in database 1227104475308 05-02-10 STWI Winter Steelhead Stream name(s) not in database 1226571475290 05-02-10 IIPriority Resident Fish Presence: Code Common Name Stream Name Stream LLID Record Date CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226571475290 04-12-08 111/ CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226742475419 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226808475756 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226824475230 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1226919475271 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1227026475270 04-12-08 II CCT Resident Cutthroat Stream name(s) not in database 1227104475308 04-12-08 1 CCT Resident Cutthroat Anderson Creek 1226818475280 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Gorst Creek 1226963475279 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Heins Creek 1227133475309 04-12-08 CCT Resident Cutthroat Parish Creek 1227123475308 04-12-08 ICodes Used In The Fish Presence Report Code : WDFW alphanumeric code that identifies the fish species. 1 IICommon Name : Common name of the fish species. Stream Name : Stream name based on the US Geological Survey, Geographic Names Information System database. IIStream LLID : Unique stream identifier (ID) generated from the node latitude and longitude located at a stream's mouth. This ID is to be construed only as an ID, and not necessarily as a reference to a stream's location. Record Date : Date the information was entered into the database. 1 • I . 1 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IKitsap County Assessor's Property Report Page 1 of 1 1 Absentee Ballot I Property Report Archie Past Elections v Future :lection Dates Tax Account No. Process No. Situs Address Poili€ g I neAttinnS 292401-1-018-2002 2161842 INO ADDRESS FOUNiter Registration I Property Class: 910- Undeveloped land info 004 Election Results & Licenses `T arrF ge, 111 Parcel Information Vehicle, Vessel Marriage Licenses Tax Code Area: 0195 #of Buildings: 0 IJurisdiction: BREMERTON Acres: 37.5 Sec-Twp-Rng: 29 24N 1E Zoning: City INeighborhood: 7402601 Account Status: A - Active ITaxpayer Information Name: OPG PROPERTIES LLC I Mailing Address: I I I I I I I . I httn:Ukrwnnub2.co.kitsan.wa_us/n1s/ilisw/lis.online lis info pkg.acct info?p in rp acct ... 2/28/2006 Kitsap County Assessor's Sale History Page 1 of 1 I I Sales History Tax Account No. Process No. Situs Address 292401-1-018-2002 2161842 Sale Date: Sale Price: Excise Number: Instrument: Screening Code: I 19-NOV-99 0 199909819 W 2 04-MAY-92 2836989 199203939 W W I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I htt :!,/kcw»pub2.t o kitcap.wa.us/nls/ilisw/online_lis info pkg.sales hist?p in rp acct id... 2/28/2006 Kitsap County Assessor's Property Report Page 1 of 1 I I Property Report Tax Account No. Process No. Situs Address 212401-3-007-2009 2362325 NO ADDRESS FOUND Property Class: 910- Undeveloped land ' Parcel Information Tax Code Area: 0010 # of Buildings: 0 IJurisdiction: BREMERTON Acres: 165.13 Sec-Twp-Rng: 21 24N 1E Zoning: City INeighborhood: 7100541 Account Status: A- Active Taxpayer Information I Name: OPG PROPERTIES LLC I Mailing Address: I I I I I 1 1 I I I http://kcwppub2.co.kitsap.wa.us/pls/ilisw/lis.online lis info pkg.acct info?p in rp acct_... 2/28/2006 Kitsap County Assessor's Sale History Page 1 of 1 i Sales History 1 Tax Account No. Process No. Situs Address 212401-3-007-2009 2362325 Sale Date: Sale Price: Excise Number: Instrument: Screening Code: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 http://kcwppub2.co.kitsap.wa.us/pls/ilisw/online lis info pkg.sales hist?p in rp acct id... 2/28/2006 ■ I WETLAND INVENTORY I West Hills Property P Y Bremerton, Washington December 23, 1997 1 RAEDEKE ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1 ADDENDUM REPORT 1 II. West Hills Property i . Bremerton Washin on 7 ...,-4.,,,...:i • • ,. - - ,_. march 3, 1997 • II I 1 I RAEDEKE ASSOCIATES, INC. Er; � T 1 I I V EnCo Environmental ICorporation I I I APPENDIX F ICREDENTIALS I I 1 I 1 I I I I I Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation, Mitigation&Restoration - ?(;-;,r) EnCo Environmental Corporation WETLAND RESUME ' Jonathan M. Kemp Wildlife, Fisheries, and Wetlands Biologist 1 • Mr. Kemp has over 24 years of experience in the environmental field and has held a ' variety of professional positions at private analytical testing laboratories, and environmental engineering and consulting firms. Since 1996, Mr. Kemp has taken the responsibility to own and operate EnCo Environmental Corporation (EnCo). • Mr. Kemp is on the most recent edition of the Pierce, Lewis, Thurston, King, and Mason Counties Wetland Specialist Lists. ■ Successfully completed a five-day wetland delineation course and a two-day wetland delineation practicum in Seattle in May of 1996. The course covered the procedures presented in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers manual with an added emphasis on hydric soils and wetland hydrology. The course taught several delineation scenarios under the direct supervision of experienced wetland delineators. The wetland ' practicum course provided training on report writing and presentation techniques. • Delineated over 150 wetlands for a variety of proposed county highway expansion ' projects and large commercial and residential developments up to 350 acres in size. Mr. Kemp determined the wetland classification, functions, values, category, type, coordinated professional surveys depicting wetland and buffer boundaries, and designed and implemented several successful mitigation projects for damaged and destroyed wetlands. ' • Mr. Kemp has knowledge of federal, state, and local laws and regulations affecting development and construction in and adjacent to jurisdictional wetlands. He has the ability to recognize and solve wetland compliance issues in a creative and cost- !' effective manner and prepares supporting documents for environmental permit applications. ' • Provided technical guidance for selecting alternative methods in order to mitigate damaged or destroyed wetlands on several commercial and residentially zoned lots. These mitigated wetlands have been monitored for over three years and have been classified as being successful projects when compared to approved governmental performance standards. 1 Resume K.M. Hutten March 31, 2005 I Karen M. Hutten 441 Hudson Rd. Port Angeles, WA 98363 (360) 928-9648 111 ' JOB SPECIFIC SKILLS: • Extensive experience with plant ecology studies (spanning 7 field seasons), conducting vegetation surveys, setting up vegetation plots, mapping vegetation, and collecting 1routine measurements for long-term ecological monitoring. • Eighteen years botanical experience: knowledgeable of vascular and non-vascular plants of western U.S. including grasses, sedges, mosses, liverworts and lichens. ' • Extensive and detailed experience with taxonomic keys. • Experienced with data collection, and with collection and transportation of voucher specimens and vegetative samples. • Experienced at hiring, training, and leading field crews for biological studies, supervising teams of up to five persons. • Cooperative and considerate in team situations. • Experienced with biological field-research equipment including(but not limited to) GPS units, compass, digital camera, clinometer, increment borer, DBH tape. • Skilled at orienteering, proficient with maps and aerial photos, and have taught compass use and orienteering to field crews. • Very comfortable with conditions in the field, capable of distance hiking with a full pack, enduring adverse weather conditions, and preparing for several days in the field at a time. • Data Management experience: Initiated the development of a Microsoft Access database for ONP's Coastal Wetlands Project to improve efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of ' data. Used ArcView to map plot locations and rare plant sightings. Related computer skills: Access, ArcView, Excel, SAS, Sigma Plot, Statgraphics. • Report-writing experience: Co-author of report Inventory of the Mosses, Liverworts and ' Lichens of Olympic National Park: Species List (in final stages of preparation - to be published by USGS); primary writer(second author) for the field guide 101 Common Mosses, Lichens, and Liverworts of the Olympic Peninsula; author of coastal wetlands ' site reports 2004; and author of MS thesis entitled Nutrient and Tannin Concentrations of Shrub Leaves in Managed and Unmanaged Forests of the Oregon Coast Range: Implications for Herbivores (1998). Related computer skills: MS Word; Wordperfect. ' • Presentation and outreach experience: part-time bryology instructor at Peninsula College, have given moss and lichen presentations for elder hostel groups, co-leader of field trips for WNPS, and instructor of weekly classes on plant biology for middle-school age ' children. While at Oregon State University I was a teacher's assistant for one year, and presented my MS thesis (award received). Related computer skills: Harvard Graphics, PowerPoint. I Resume K.M. Hutten March 31, 2005 ' EDUCATION Foss High School, Tacoma, WA 98407 Graduated June, 1984 (GPA: 3.79) ' Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 Bachelor of Science June, 1989: Geology(GPA: 3.69) June, 1994: Botany(GPA: 3.97) Master of Science: June, 1998: Forest Science (GPA: 3.66) 80 credit hours ' WORK EXPERIENCE Botany Instructor—part time ' February—March 2005. Peninsula College, Port Angeles, WA Co-teacher of class on moss, liverwort and lichen identification. ' Science Instructor—part time October 2004—Present. Home Connections, Port Angeles, WA Science teacher for homeschool organization, teaching botany,biology, field skills, and ' chemistry in a school setting, one day per week. Contact: Randy Mouw (360) 279-5057 ' Biological Science Technician (plants) GS-07: May—September 2004. Olympic National Park. Conducted vascular plant surveys in Coastal Wetlands of Olympic National Park, visiting ' sites considered under-botanized and likely to support species not yet located. This often required locating wetlands on maps and aerial photos and orienteering cross-country. Plant lists were made for each polygon(a subjective outline of a plant community) within each site visited. All vascular plant species occurring within a polygon were identified using either Hitchcock and Cronquist or more recent keys as advised by the Flora of the Olympic Peninsula. Polygons were outlined in ArcView, and species names and cover ' class were entered into an access database that I initiated and co-developed with the data manager for ONP. For species considered either"park rare" or listed by the Washington State Natural Heritage program, locations were recorded with GPS and entered into ' ArcView. Vegetation data was collected for rare plant locations using the Releve' method. Additional work included aiding in a study to locate white bark pine and assess blister rust infection in the high country. This required differentiating krummholz white bark and western white pine, looking for indications of infection, measuring tree diameter (dbh), tree coring, and taking GPS points of trees. I also identified the Ribes specimens for this study and developed a"cheat sheet"to aid others in field identification of Ribes. ' Additionally, I identified troublesome grasses and collected seed for the Elwha restoration project. 40 hours per week ' Supervisor: Rich Olson (360) 565-3069 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I E+ nCo Environmental ' Corporation 1 i 1 APPENDIX G ' TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Phase I&II Environmental Site Assessments•Remediation Services•Wetland Delineation,Mitigation&Restoration 1 1 ' TERMS AND CONDITIONS -WETLANDS The EnCo report is for the exclusive use of our client and their assigns. Any other parties that wish to use the report shall notify EnCo in writing and shall obtain a Reliance Letter. A separate fee will be charged for this service. The intent of the report was to identify and delineate portions of the subject property that could be classified as wetland according to the wetland delineation methods described in the report text. The information presented in the attached report reflects the best professional opinion regarding the conditions observed on the subject property at the time the work was performed. The scope of work did not include determining wetland function and values, completing permit applications, attending meetings with the client or regulatory officials, preparing mitigation plans, habitat or biological analysis, endangered ' species studies, erosion and sedimentation issues, pollutant impacts, stormwater drainage, and/or geotechnical impacts. ' In delineating wetlands EnCo employed professional and technical judgment in accordance with the degree of care and skill generally accepted in the nature of the work accomplished within the constraints of time, budget, and defined scope of work. Our ' services were executed in accordance with professional standards acceptable in this profession in accordance with then-current technical guidelines and criteria. The determination of ecological system classifications, functions, values, and boundaries is an inexact science and different individuals and agencies may reach different ' conclusions. Wetlands are dynamic communities and may change over time. We cannot guarantee the outcome of such agency determinations. The information and conclusions presented in the attached report may need to be revised based on comments from agency determinations. ' The work was performed based on my understanding of the local, state, and federal regulations and site conditions at the time of the field work. The final wetland and buffer boundary determinations and wetland classifications and/or categories should be verified ' and approved by the local jurisdiction prior to any land use modification. Past and present conditions, which cannot or could not be observed, were established ' on the basis of reasonably ascertainable records, maps, photographs, documents, and/or information provided by federal, state, and/or local agencies and contacted individuals. EnCo cannot attest to the validity, completeness, or accuracy of these documents or personal accounts. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. ' Items provided by the client included the right of entry (verbally or by a contract) onto the subject property for conducting the work. The property boundaries were clearly marked ' or determined by the client prior the fieldwork. A professional survey was or will be performed by others. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1