HomeMy WebLinkAboutSHERIDAN RD, 620P ;
_... Receipt No. '7-
�T :j 45351
Fee $ ...............:...................:............................. . p---�------------------------...-----------•------- ------ ...
BUILDING PERMIT
CITY OF BREMERTON ' • BUILDING DEPARTMENT
F. E. IRISH, Building Inspector., • ESsex 3-1411, Ext. 36
Owner's Value Bldg. Dept. ValueDESCRIPTION:�'��_,�,-�r�,
Lot Blocky4 f7
Address on Job -=--------------------------
------------ Date ---
Building ------------_-- x ----------- ----- and ---------------- stories ------------------------ basement. Lot
Front Yard ------------------------ Rear Yard ------------------------ Side Yard ----------------------- Garage ------- ----------------------
OCCUPANCY. PERMIT REQUIRED BEFORE OCCUPYING BUILDING Zone -------- Z_/______ _______________
Owner �'Qon =Ie - ---- -----------------_------- Address >g;?11A9 Phone ----_----------
Contractor,�r��_._�'�'oy��__aa'_ �� ����Address _ ��'�"
`----------- -------------------
Phone
This permit is issued for:
� a P
•
----------------------------------------------------------------------------f- t` r- -. °�1'`r----------4�19tH--
-------- — �--
All_ work to conform to all, applicable building ordinances and amendments. Please note the following
special instructions and requirements.
DETACH HERE AND POST THIS SECTION ON JOB
INSPECTION — Reinforcing steel must be inspected after placing and before covering. FORMS shall be inspected
and approved before pouring. All plumbing, wiring and the frame of all buildings must be inspected and approved
before covering. Wood preservative to be used on all wood against masonry. Ventilate foundation and attic. Sepa-
rate permits required for plumbing, wiring and heating. See City Engineer before working on streets or sidewalks.
---------------------------------------
--------------------- '= = ,•_ ! ..-��_ _ � 1 - �v�l - ,?
'0 J --
-------------•------------------------------Y----------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------ == ---------------------
----------------
ii�C%'.�s../'.r:/.l..eG.au-.4,%P:r11_._F/-_o4_L'�-ra�''..L---•----G�-='�=fills __-x�--ii...z,C� sfad;P.a.:a�e�_,:._
----------------------------- ----------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------
------ :4 - ------- c . 7. =' �'r =• �----c-----------
�c�s�ac------------------ -------------¢
- --- -
---------------------
--=------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------•----------------------------------------------------_------------ ------- -------- -----------------------------------------------
v------------------------------------------------------------ `---------------------------------•-------
------------------------------------- i
1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------•-------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------•--------------------------------•---------------------- ---------------------------
r
----------------------------------
•--•---•-------------•--•---•-------------•-.___.___-____-----'------------•-------•------•--•-----------------•---'---'---••-•---"-•-•--••-•••-
T
.................................................................................................•--..--...._._........._..--........--.......--...._....._....................
--------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---_.--_•.__..--_---'---------'•--••----•----
llku
Owner-'s Signature --------------- ----------------------------- By -•-••- 6�r
Hisjtluthorized Ageni
Building Inspector _._.
° of By-•-•-•--•-------•-------------•---•-----------------------•-•--_•--- -----------•-•------
N :' 46066 Fee .... ............................. -- Receipt No. ...... ------
c7
BUILDING PERMIT
CITY OF BREMERTON • BUILDING DEPARTMENT
F. E. IRISH, Building Inspector • ESsex 3-1411, Ext. 36
Owner's Value Bldg. Dept. Value ' DESCRIPTION:
$.r Lot Block Additions
Address on Job ---------------------
c^�4._f__.`s' Date f
Building ---------------- x ---------------- and ---------------- stories -----_----------------- basement. Lot ---------------- x _--------------
Front Yard ------------------------ Rear Yard - ------ Side Yard ------------------------ Garage ------------------------------
OCCUPANCY PERMIT REQUIRED BEFORE OCCUPYING BUILDING Zone --------- _________________________________
Owner ----;^`. ' ;.= = - ' -- Address Phone
Contractor------_-------- ig .,------------------------------------- Address ------------------------------------_---- Phone --------
This permit is issued for:--------------
---------------------------------------- --! ? -�� � c Svc. ��t` /1 41
----------^--'-----------------------'--____- ^----------------------- "-- - r--------------""---------'-----------------------
------------
--------- �---�---------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
All work to conform to all applicable building ordinances and amendments. Please note the following
special instructions and requirements.
DETACH HERE AND POST THIS SECTION ON JOB
INSPECTION — Reinforcing steel must be inspected after placing and before covering. FORMS shall be inspected
and approved before pouring. All plumbing, wiring and the frame of all buildings must be inspected and approved
before covering. Wood preservative to be used on all wood against masonry. Ventilate foundation and attic. Sepa-
rate permits required for plumbing, wiring and heating. See City Engineer before working on streets or sidewalks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------..----------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------,,------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'--------- -------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------'----------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------__ -----------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-'----------------------_----------------------------....------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................
.. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Owner's Signature------------------------------------------------------------ BY--------------------------------------------------------'---------- ------
His Authorized Agent
Building Inspector ---------------_-----=' '�-------:'� � -'
-0
CITY OF BIZFN :RT0 I
I?dNIRO ^}L'I1A}. ASSESS14ENT
Property Holding and Development Building Permit Application
SS Wit i,i;.tlti-Farlily llousing Project
ACTION: Building Permit Application for a 53 L1nit ?11ulti-Family
Housing Development on 5..9 Acres at approximately 612 Sheridan
Road.
SPONSOR: Property lloldin�; F, DevelTIPIent.
Tacoma, }'lashington
General
The action requested of the City is the issuance of a building permit for
a S3 unit multi -family housing development in East Bremerton on a 5.9 acre
wooded site at approxi -lately 612 Sheridan !load. The building permit is
requested under Section 328 of the Zoning Ordinance which allows one
dwelling unit for each 4800 sq. ft. of site area.. Under this section of. the
R.-1 Chapter of the Zoliing Ordinance the residentia=l dwellings may be placed,
in any configuration choosen by the developer as long as yard and height
requirements are ]flet.
This site' is the same parcel which Boggess and Richardson requested a
rezone from R-1 to R-2 in the Spring of 1974. That rezone was denied
however the City Council has since aiiinended the R--1 Section of Zoning
Ordinance to allow multi -family developmeii-it in R-1 zones.
The site has 317 J=eet:. frontage on Shori.dan .?o.::' and is 816 feet deem to .tl,e
north. .vest of the site is a tier of r esMent.i.al lots on Pine Road. East
of the Site Lies the Parr property and. M .rain
Should the requested pen-7,it be issued and subsequelit development take ,,lace,
there would be niterat.a.ons to the existing natural and. social conditions.
Addendum A provides a brief description and analysis of these conditions
as they no ; exist in relation to the property.
Information relating to soils and geological material indicate that the site
offers good to excellent foundation stability. Considering the slopes
encountered on the property, and the type of soil Which occupies the KYOTO,
only moderate limitations are expected to be encountered with the tyj�e of
development I,roposed.. These limitations are in respect to potential frost
action and a potentially high seasonal water table. Effects from the
potential limitations are not expected to be significant.
The developr,7ent will not substantially effect the underground storage or
flow of water.
Surface water retention :is small because of the slope, the sparse ground -
cover and the -very thin covering of leaf mold. Surface runoff will be
increased slightly and wi.11 be conta7linated by the grease and oil, etc.
washed from the paving on the parking lots -,',?d -streets.
The streajn rtll7nn d7.agonal.l.y iI7 a north/south direction across the
property, most probably has its source .in the bog approximately 1/4 mile
to the north, (designated as an aquai:er recharge area on the soils map).
The water collectcd in the bon would also have a sub-stantia.! :influence on the.
condition and anount of groun1 at-er in the a ca to the South.
s
-0
CITY OF BIZFN :RT0 I
I?dNIRO ^}L'I1A}. ASSESS14ENT
Property Holding and Development Building Permit Application
SS Wit i,i;.tlti-Farlily llousing Project
ACTION: Building Permit Application for a 53 L1nit ?11ulti-Family
Housing Development on 5..9 Acres at approximately 612 Sheridan
Road.
SPONSOR: Property lloldin�; F, DevelTIPIent.
Tacoma, }'lashington
General
The action requested of the City is the issuance of a building permit for
a S3 unit multi -family housing development in East Bremerton on a 5.9 acre
wooded site at approxi -lately 612 Sheridan !load. The building permit is
requested under Section 328 of the Zoning Ordinance which allows one
dwelling unit for each 4800 sq. ft. of site area.. Under this section of. the
R.-1 Chapter of the Zoliing Ordinance the residentia=l dwellings may be placed,
in any configuration choosen by the developer as long as yard and height
requirements are ]flet.
This site' is the same parcel which Boggess and Richardson requested a
rezone from R-1 to R-2 in the Spring of 1974. That rezone was denied
however the City Council has since aiiinended the R--1 Section of Zoning
Ordinance to allow multi -family developmeii-it in R-1 zones.
The site has 317 J=eet:. frontage on Shori.dan .?o.::' and is 816 feet deem to .tl,e
north. .vest of the site is a tier of r esMent.i.al lots on Pine Road. East
of the Site Lies the Parr property and. M .rain
Should the requested pen-7,it be issued and subsequelit development take ,,lace,
there would be niterat.a.ons to the existing natural and. social conditions.
Addendum A provides a brief description and analysis of these conditions
as they no ; exist in relation to the property.
Information relating to soils and geological material indicate that the site
offers good to excellent foundation stability. Considering the slopes
encountered on the property, and the type of soil Which occupies the KYOTO,
only moderate limitations are expected to be encountered with the tyj�e of
development I,roposed.. These limitations are in respect to potential frost
action and a potentially high seasonal water table. Effects from the
potential limitations are not expected to be significant.
The developr,7ent will not substantially effect the underground storage or
flow of water.
Surface water retention :is small because of the slope, the sparse ground -
cover and the -very thin covering of leaf mold. Surface runoff will be
increased slightly and wi.11 be conta7linated by the grease and oil, etc.
washed from the paving on the parking lots -,',?d -streets.
The streajn rtll7nn d7.agonal.l.y iI7 a north/south direction across the
property, most probably has its source .in the bog approximately 1/4 mile
to the north, (designated as an aquai:er recharge area on the soils map).
The water collectcd in the bon would also have a sub-stantia.! :influence on the.
condition and anount of groun1 at-er in the a ca to the South.
•
Environmental Assessment
S3-thiit Multi -Family
Housing Project
The City sanitary sewer system is adequate to serve the urban development which
might be exTected to take place in this neighborhood. This would include both
increased singled family development and. multi -family development as proposed.
The action of issuing building perm.its.for this development would be a
positive factor leading toward future development of this neighborhood.
It is not known the degree to which*these actions would enhance the
possibilities of future development.
As a result of the foregoing findings'",�it-is the opinion of the staff that
the action of issuing a building permit..would result in environmental
effects which are not significantly adverse and therefore, an Environmental
Impact Statement, will not be prepared.
WW-ORGE PLES -ITR
lanni g Director
0
Enviroi-oriental Assessment
53 -Unit Olt:i-Family
}lousing Project
-2-
Should surface drainage from roofs or parking areas be allowed to enter
the stream, dokvnstream water quality would be reduced. Adequate storm
sewer is available at Pine and Sheridan; utilization of this facility
would eliminate potential storm water pollution of the stream.
The development plans indicate that the Ss unit will be located in 5 two-
story structures. All the units are oriented to the.view to the west.
The area to the south and .east of the small stremm is shown to be
undeveloped.
Initially about 4S96 of the site will be cleared for the construction of
roads, buildings and ,)arhing facilities: About 250 of this developed
area will be relandscaped for a total loss of about 33% of the vegetative
cover.
Numbers of people in the neighborhood will increase by approximately 96.
This figure is based cn 1973 average household size for miulti-family
structures of: 20 or more units in this neighborhood. This would mean in
approximate 3% increase in the total population of the neighborhood.
The most recent data available indicates that between . 35 and .39 school_ age
children can be expected to occupy each two Wroom apartment. The proposed
complex contains 21 one -bedroom and 32 two- bedroom: units. If the two
bedroom average is applied to all 53 units, the resulting number of school
age children would be less than 21. This nt: ber of: children distributed
over the 1.2 years of public education, does not indicate any adverse effects
to be felt by the local school system as a result of the proposed. action,
Traffic characteristics within the neighborhood and particularly on Sheridan
Road will be altered with addition of 53 aparment units.
At present, the average daily traffic count on Sheridan- road, 'adjacent to
the subject property, is approximately 3800 veh:i_cics a. day.
To determine the impact of the proposed on the traffic pattern,
a comparison has been made beti-ieen single far.i:i.ly development and the 5:, unit.
complex. The averao e rn, mber of trips taken per day per 'dwelling unit is S.
A trip is considered to be the going from one poi. -it to another point. Thus,
weekly grocery shopping would involve two trips; one from home to the
grocery store, and a second from the grocery store back i,_ome.
Single family developmentof this site would ronult :in daily traffic counts
on Sheridan Road of approximately 3940 vehicles. The multi -family development.,
as proposed, ivould result in 4065 vehicles daily passing this point on
Sheridan Road. The percentage difference in the impact of multi -family
development over single family development is 3%. Considering a 14 hour day
in which the greater majority of traffic occurs, the difference between s1ngh,
family and multi -family developT:ent of the property would he that less than
10 more trips per hour are generated by the multi -family developirent. This
level of increase is insignificant.
Sheridan Road is scheduled for improvement :in 1975--76, as indicated on the
City's Sit Year Construction Plan for Streets and. Ay terials. The Nprovarent
is planned to include grading, the placing of store sewer in the road bed.,
curbs, sidewalks find p.a.v ing The resulting street would be two lanes wide,
with two parking lanos and sidewalks.
r
t'
k
r
t
Enviroi-oriental Assessment
53 -Unit Olt:i-Family
}lousing Project
-2-
Should surface drainage from roofs or parking areas be allowed to enter
the stream, dokvnstream water quality would be reduced. Adequate storm
sewer is available at Pine and Sheridan; utilization of this facility
would eliminate potential storm water pollution of the stream.
The development plans indicate that the Ss unit will be located in 5 two-
story structures. All the units are oriented to the.view to the west.
The area to the south and .east of the small stremm is shown to be
undeveloped.
Initially about 4S96 of the site will be cleared for the construction of
roads, buildings and ,)arhing facilities: About 250 of this developed
area will be relandscaped for a total loss of about 33% of the vegetative
cover.
Numbers of people in the neighborhood will increase by approximately 96.
This figure is based cn 1973 average household size for miulti-family
structures of: 20 or more units in this neighborhood. This would mean in
approximate 3% increase in the total population of the neighborhood.
The most recent data available indicates that between . 35 and .39 school_ age
children can be expected to occupy each two Wroom apartment. The proposed
complex contains 21 one -bedroom and 32 two- bedroom: units. If the two
bedroom average is applied to all 53 units, the resulting number of school
age children would be less than 21. This nt: ber of: children distributed
over the 1.2 years of public education, does not indicate any adverse effects
to be felt by the local school system as a result of the proposed. action,
Traffic characteristics within the neighborhood and particularly on Sheridan
Road will be altered with addition of 53 aparment units.
At present, the average daily traffic count on Sheridan- road, 'adjacent to
the subject property, is approximately 3800 veh:i_cics a. day.
To determine the impact of the proposed on the traffic pattern,
a comparison has been made beti-ieen single far.i:i.ly development and the 5:, unit.
complex. The averao e rn, mber of trips taken per day per 'dwelling unit is S.
A trip is considered to be the going from one poi. -it to another point. Thus,
weekly grocery shopping would involve two trips; one from home to the
grocery store, and a second from the grocery store back i,_ome.
Single family developmentof this site would ronult :in daily traffic counts
on Sheridan Road of approximately 3940 vehicles. The multi -family development.,
as proposed, ivould result in 4065 vehicles daily passing this point on
Sheridan Road. The percentage difference in the impact of multi -family
development over single family development is 3%. Considering a 14 hour day
in which the greater majority of traffic occurs, the difference between s1ngh,
family and multi -family developT:ent of the property would he that less than
10 more trips per hour are generated by the multi -family developirent. This
level of increase is insignificant.
Sheridan Road is scheduled for improvement :in 1975--76, as indicated on the
City's Sit Year Construction Plan for Streets and. Ay terials. The Nprovarent
is planned to include grading, the placing of store sewer in the road bed.,
curbs, sidewalks find p.a.v ing The resulting street would be two lanes wide,
with two parking lanos and sidewalks.
y 5/13/75
ADDENDUIvt A
ENVIROMIENTAL ASSESSMENT
P.H.D. CORP. BUILDING PERMIT
This property was apparently stripped of all vegetation approximately 10 to
15 years ago. The vegetation has progressed beyond the grass stage and into
the deciduais stage. The final stage would be the coniferous, and is still far
in the future. The predominant specie of trees in the area are Alder, with a
lesser number of Vine Maple and Big Leaf Maple.. A few Madrona, Fir and Cedar
Str@es are also found. The understory is composed mostly of fern, Oregon Grape,
alal and a few Huckleberry. There are also some small.cedar trees, approxi-
mately six to ten feet high. Those shrubs such as Red Willow, Thimbleberry,
Salmonberry and Currant are lacking. In the lower, southwestern corner of the
property is some Blackberry and Scotchbroom..
Walking through the area, no wildlife wad encountered, with the exception
of one Winter Wren. Although additional field trips would be required to make
a valid determination of the presence or absence of wildlife, the nature of the
habitat would not indicate the presence -of, -large numbers of individual species
of birds or animals.
Stephenson Canyon Park, one of the largest parks in the City of Bremerton,
and which is in its natural state, is approximately two blocks away from the
subject site. Therefore, it is presumed that the vast majority of the birds and
animals in this particular area inhabit that park, rather than the woodland
where the apartment houses are proposed to be constructed. With such a large
natural park close by, the removal of the habitat would not have a great impact
on the plants and animals within the general area because they can easily move
to Stephenson Canyon Park.
A stream runs diagonally across the eastern half of the subject property,
in a north/south direction. The stream originates in a small pool at the
northern end of the property and there cascades down the sloping terrain following
-the base of a steep gulch. As proposed, the stream would be an attractive
landscape feature for the proposed project and future residential. development
to the east.
The land uses in the surrounding area are generally residential.. To the
east of the subject property is a large acreage containing one dwelling unit,
and beyond that a row -of houses along McClain Avenue. To the west of the property
is one dwelling unit on Sheridan Road and another dwelling unit along the western
border rear the northern part of the property. This dwelling.is"served'by-a dirt
drive coming from Pine Road. To the south, across Sheridan Road, are four dwelling
units. On the corner of Sheridan Road and Pine Road is a small neighborhood grocery
store. Generally, the type of housing to the south is that which was constructed
as temporary housing during World War II. To the north of the property, the land
is vacant until you reach the site of the Armin Jahr school.
The soils in the area are such that they would support heavy buildings with-
out any hazards. To the north of the property, however, is an area of muck, which
is probably the source of the water in the creek.
Si. r�J Ly' .. •4,
t �f a '�.•jt .° _ �"`'"•yrv,�;�. ,�"
7,0
n i.
7 Z / T � .t
ty S. tit �tro-a s �, Ge".*' JI L..
A fl 0-,-,) �. rii. `,- s I'.+ �.�JTN ��s 3'-
,��ft
ALT
..t
--------------------------------- ---------- -----------------
ul?1zC�l*'€' I:.343Yt; M` 8 1-o r o v c d
9.' -7 i i LCA 27'ti "il v . ./ «. ,. riT 7:C0'd s Ci S
ati L D tt'e Peri -it isS;
------=------ --------------------------------------------------
¢ Tra'fzc =Partn,Prit: �/ t,Ge�'' : proved approved
Cor--j-'.ants
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- T�);
'"r1 1T?e.r7 ring' l;eT)2Y ul-i—en ,: -Approved, :;ot n- pro ed Ccrr cticn Permit r'n-".!irn'
�,. janitarzr-DrainaF.-� e
gyral na e-- .. �..
c nci! r rcc?nd utile ✓i =s ' ___��_ �}
'f •�A�.C.. a.�:Z.,,,.-m� v,,tZ7=`':,l v"S...Ci,,.t�. ,.'�.'. �`Y=s+���� p,.,��,b� f^ � ss. n - ,I '�.1
>, ��'.,,:¢�....ys'+++..,�,$ ,r•�'t.�-w^``.s.��q*je� - �.. -' "��; � _ 1' t `�"C�w�- °,, . 1;�� �e'��t - ..
• ; r �^ ..fk±�*w.�+?�"" ' :i.-��'4„-'�''crt.n...t s�`:-:�'".�v��"^4 .4.a h.. .,w„{1.M`,(;,,,,`
�� �'�". v2 �:Ca,. Lt",z"?. �^.T"tlli�x �i: .�" � � � �i•�•,�y,otT�C: �\ �\Oti ae-r rr0�rs�d
Pl !`i4' 1 C" �l ei oTJ x)pr"iP l!
i
C G7-1
s l t c ; �'j,! ./r� { F -t r t. � �� 4A ,�.!�{ • /',..,�" � ,i� a.�'�+�- `��L�
c -f I;r'
Ing
_ H a:� Gam-✓,, w`e
rmi
______________ m --_-__-_-_a_-.-_--------------
.on,
•_ `
ot X 55 o �r YL2Clic � -ori .: �,ro� -e
r.�_–.n, �-'d?�.LSC%1.. ✓ .2..n✓F..6^^,...x--r-<u.r,.. ,,,,j„YLw.. r•Cw t, ,, ..[.. 1
'•' CJ V'. ,,.. y 4F r^fc-.e-c �.�c^'J. _ �h�G`}�1.''d" .��f 1.:�t...� ..rs+'."'S'-...!'y + _
v ` .+� \. , �i: ,..y.-•{�cl/-G„• ,Gcr-: "4�' � /�7 �,.� ' ,i" ----'�,/'-�j,�-'�'n-',�;y�!:���-s="^.-C.,.r:i ,,..- y:.caNMY .4e...
�
1..�.('i;'_.,. .."'"t•f.+T/'�� !/Lr �W.��' .�'y'w•4-..Ci,...., �'j��ji�'+ ( tn'_C..a f:.�^�'. ,
.± f „r Y':t3�=.I 6.`/"'�...s3 �'i"f ^'.K.<•..c.G;•-.�.+-�•..�i C5'4�7ii^,c..
tf 4 t ae:. r 5 p.. � •y ... � •. 6
THEE OLYMPICS
j ' \ i:Al
GLENN K. JARSTAD FRED S. SCHONEMAN
MAYOR AND COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER
OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES
ROBERT B. STEWART June 11 1975 G. C. YEADON, SR.
COMMISSIONER CITY CLERK
OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING AND PURCHASING AGENT
Building Department
City of Bremerton
Re: Letter of Approval
Property Holding & Development
apartment complex at
620 Sheridan Rd.
The proposed apartment complex will have 53 apartments on the 5.9 acre
site. Approximately 55% of'the site will remain in outdoor livability space
free of buildings, parking or roads. The average dwelling unit density
is approximately 9 dwelling units per acre, or 4500 square feet per dwelling
unit, which is the minimum area per dwelling unit required in the R=1 district
of the zoning ordinance.
The Comprehensive Plan as adopted by the Sheridan.Neighborhood Planning
Committee has designated this area as a rural environment. The environment
immediately south of Sheridan Road and adjacent to this site is in the
urban environment. Both areas lie within a residential land use category.
There is no definite line where one environment ends and another begins, but
rather there is a transition area between environments which would have the
characteristics of each of the environments.
An apartment structure built at the normal R-1 residential density
creates greater common open space than would be possible if' the area were
platted out in lots and single family dwellings built on each of these lots.
Therefore, this gives us urban density and still creates the openness that is
a requirement of the rural environment. With multifamily structures, a larger
proportion of the natural vegetation will be left undisturbed.
Approval is hereby granted in accordance with Section 328.2 of the Zoning
Ordinance #1792 under the following conditions:
1. The approval is based upon the site plan as submitted and dated
March 15, 1975 and as amended by the plan dated June 4, 1975.
2. Outlet grease & oil traps be placed at points where storm drainage
enters the stream.
3. The face of the fill crossing the stream should be replanted with
indigenous vegetation.
HOME OF THE PUGETi SOUND NAVAL BASE AND SHIPYARD
r
Building Dept.
City of Bremerton (P.H.D. Approval) -2- June 11, 1975
4. Clearing shall be limited to roads, parking and building
locations, except where selective clearing would improve views.
5. The fire return shall be blocked to normal traffic.
Three letters of opposition were received and two parties came to the
Planning Department to review the plan. r,
cc: City Attorney
P.H.D. Inc.,
Mrs. Warren Wagner
Mr. & Mrs. Owen Tripp
Pat Carey
Sheridan Neighborhood Housing Committee.
Mrs. Clarice Parr
Joe O'Brien
3OZO PINE ROAD
pREMIERTON, '�'i%+SHINGTON
tMAY 19, 1975
GEORGE PLESCHER, PLANNING DIRECTOR
CITY HALL
2i9 POUTH STREET
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON 99510
DEAR, MiR. PLESCHER,
HO!"J MANY TIMES HAVE YOU HEARD THE REMARK 11 GOVERNOR DAN EVANS IS NOT LISTENING
TO THE PEOPLE?II I THINK WE HAVE THE VERY SAME PROBLEt-X-IN OUR OWN CITY HALL.
JUST A LITTLE OVER A YEAR AGO CITZENS 1N THE MANETTE VILLA, SHERIDAN AND PINE
ROAD AREA HIRED A LAWYER TO REPRESENT THEM AND HAD A PETITION 4J I TH APPROX INIATELY`
165 SIGNATURES STATING THAT WE DID NOT WANT A REZONE CHANGE TO ALLOV,A DEVELOPMENT
OF APARTMENTS IN OUR AREA, BOGGESS/RICHARDSON REZONE OFF SHERIDAN ROAD. CITY
HALL DENIED THE REZONE, FOR WHICH WE ARE GRATEFUL -- BUT --- A FE'+ti: MONTHS LATER
CHANGED A CITY ORDINANCE SUCH THAT NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT IS UNDER VERY LOOSE
CONTROLS. 'NHAT FREEDOM TO THE DEVELOPERS AND AN 1NDISCRET1OWN,TO THE PRIVATE
HOME OWNERS!!
NOV;, AN APARTMENT COMPLEX UNDER THE NAME OF PROPERTY HOLDING AND 'DEVELOPME=NT$
TACOMA, '%`,ASH I NGT ON, 13 AGAIN PLANNED FOR THE VERY GAME APEA, A\O YlE AS PRIVATE
CITIZ'EN'S HAVELITTLE: RECOURSE@ TF';E SHERIDAN NEIGHDORHOOD COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE
PLAN PREPARED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE AREA OVER SEVERALP/ONTHS OF EFFORT SEEMS TO
BE IGNORED& IF OTHER;'! I Sr, THE PERM: 1 T REQUEST WOULD NOT SO MUCH AS BE CONSIDERED,
'NE KNON YOU APE ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT APART:'+LENTS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. I THINK
YOU 1'+'ILL FIND FEW HOME ONNERS THAT 1'+'ILL AGREE %`LITH YOUR REASONING. ',titTH ALL THE
OPEN LAND IN THIS AR.EAy ARE G%'E TO BE OUTNU�-IBERED %`' I: TH APARTt.IE HJT BUILDINGS?
DOES ',REMERTON REALLY NEED ALL THE APARTi•.iENT COMPLEXES THAT ARE SEEING BUILT AND
ONES THAT HAVE APPLIED FOR REZONES TO BUILD? YOU HAVE POINTED OUT T%^JO LARGE
APART.mKNT BUILDINGS THAT WERE MISTAKES I N PERI.i 1 TT i NG THEM TO BE BUILT. 'NI LL
WE END UP tli 1 TH A It I STAKE 11 IN OUR NE I GHBORHG'D:
�'+COST OF THE SAt:4E NEIGHBORHOOD PEOPLE 4VHO TOLD CITY HALL WHAT THEY \NANTED A YEAR
AGO WILL PROBABLY DO NOTHING ABOUT THIS CO,'APLEX. '+`fHY? FOP. SOfvlT OF THEPA, THIS
WILL'BE THE THLRD TIME THEY HAVE TOLD CITY HALL THEY DO NOT WANT APARTMENTS IN
THIS AREA AND THEY ARE TIRED OF TRYING TO GET CITY HALL TO LISTEN. A "WHAT'S THE
USE 11 ATTITUDE HAS DEVELOPED. IT LEAVES ONE TO ':BONDER ABOUT THE INTEGRITY OF
CITY 'HALL.
S PREVAIL UPON CITY HALL TO MAINTAIN GOOD FAITH 'WITH THE SHERIDAN NEIGHBORHOOD
PLANNING PEOPLE AAD DENY THE PERMIT REQUESTED BY PROPERTY.AND HOLDING OEVELOPMENT,
TACOMA, ' ASHINGTON.
VERY TRULY YOURS
IYIRS. CWEN S. TRIPP
tAAY 20, 1975
FROM: Q'JEN S. TR1pP
300 PINE ROAD
BREMERTON, 'NASHINGTON 95310
TO: MR. GEORGE PLESCHER, PLANNING -DIRECTOR
CITY OF BREMERTON
239 FOURTH STREET
BREIAERTON, WASHINGTON 98310
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR BUILDING PERMIT
PROPERTY HOLDING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
'— —UNIT MULTI—FAi ILY DEVELOPMENT,AT 612 SHERIDAN ROAD
DEAR SIR:
THIS IS TO ADVISE YOU THAT 1 AM OPPOSED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF MULTIDWELLING
UNITS AT THE SUBJECT SITE*
SUCH FORM OF HOUSING HAS ALREADY BEEN PERMI TIED TO AN EXTENT THAT IS UNDESIRABLE
FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. — TIK COURTS AT SYLVAN AND EINE ROAD, A LARGE NUMBER OF
UNITS UNDER CONSTRUCTION OFF PINE ROAD ON THE ORIGINAL CHRIST'IANSEN PROPERTY; A
UNIT PLANNED AT ROBIN AVENUE, AND A NURSING HOME AND APARTMENTS PLANNED OFF SYLVAN
WEST OF Pl NE ROAD. THE MULTI PLE—OVIELLI NG DEVELOPMENTS ARE ENCROUCH I NG INTO A
NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS CHARACTERIZED BY PRIVATE HOMES AND LOW POPULATION DENSITY.
THE FOLL04tiING ARE FIVE SPECIFIC REASONS WHY ADDITIONAL MULTIPLE—Dk.%fELLING DEVELOP—
MENTS SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED IN THE GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD AREA:
1e APPROXI!AATELY 160 CITIZENS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD PETITIONED THE CITY COUNCIL
TO DENY A REZONE -REQUEST -.FOR-:-MULTIPLE—D1'JELL1NG DEVELOPMENT ON THE SANTE PROPERTY,
ONE YEAR AGOo
2. THE. VOTE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO DENY THE REZONE RE -QUEST
(pGGGESSIRICFEARCSQN)
WAS UNAI,4IMOUS. IN THE PREPARATORY STATEMENT FOR A. MOTION TO DENY T'HE RE;2UEST,
COiaiiVASSIONER OCHONEMAN CONCLUDED THAT THE RE1IAINDER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOULD BE
PRESERVED FOR SINGLE FAMILY D'NELLINGSs THE CITIZENS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD APPRECIATED
THAT*
3• THE CURRENT REQUEST FOR A PERN11 T TO BUILD MULTIPLE—D?`:'ELLI NG STRUCTURES AT THE
SUBJECT SITE IS CONTRARY TO THE SHERIDAN NEIGHBORHOOD COMPREHENSIVE (_.AND USE PLAN,
PREPARED BY THE CITIZENS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, UPON INVITATION BY THE CITY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, AND A YEAR OF CONCERNED EFFORT.
• THE BUILDING SITE 1S ESSENTIALLY. LAND --LOCKED BY SURROUNDING PRIVATE HO%tES.
TRESPASSING AND SII:41LAR NUISANCES ARE ENTIRELY FORESEEABLE.
�e GOOD AND PROPER DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT SITE WOULD AT MOST BE BY %'.'ELL
SPACED PRIVATE HOMES.
THE CONCERNS AND INTERESTS FOR PLANNING THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAVE BEEN WELL PLACED
BEFORE THE CITY PLANNING DEPART,.;ENT WITH THE EXPECTATIONS OF BEING HONORED*
ACCORDINGLY, THE SUBJECT REQUEST FOR PERMIT IMUST BE DENIED*
VERY TRULY YOURS, �
(61
1 �' °-
ONEId S. TR I pP
PAUL PAZOOKI, P.E.
DENNIS M. McMENAMIN, P.E.
JOHN R. BRISKI, P.L.S.
May 8, 1975
0 •
PAZOOKI & McMENAMIN
ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING
CENTRAL KITSAP MALL
P. O. BOX 728
SILVERDALE, WASHINGTON 98383
SK 2-5333 MY 2-5525
Mr Fred E. Irish, Building Inspector
City of Bremerton
239 Fourth Street
Bremerton, Wa. 98310
RE: Plan Review for Bremerton Apartments
Near Sheridan Street and Pine Road
_..Dear Mr. Irish:
TACOMA OFFICE:
1008 S. YAKIMA AVE.
TACOMA, WA 98405
BR 2.3146
We have reviewed the plans and specifications for the Bremerton
Apartments submitted by Richard H. Shaw, Developer.
We recommend the following items be on file with the Bremerton
Building Department prior to the issuance of a building permit.
1. A site survey and topography showing new and
existing contours - (use City of Bremerton Datum).
2. Drainage flow design for culvert.
3. Plan profile design for sewer, storm and water, sub-
mitted to Bremerton Engineering Department.
4. Site and soils investigations in accordance with
Section 2905-c, 1973 UBC.
5. Structural calculations from licensed structural
engineer for prefab roof trusses and for building
horizontal and vertical loads.
6. Provide general structural notes by structural eng-
ineer. The engineer of record for the project shall
ems turfy the co.n.struction of the roof trusses, and
connections, roof diaphragms, shear walls and struct-
ural intergrity of the buildings to be -in accordance
with his design.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.
Very Truly Yours,
PAZOOKI & McMENAMIN
v
Dennis M. McMenamin, E.
DM/ps
#1792
May 9, 1975
City of Bremerton
Building Department
239 Fourth Street
Bremerton, Washington 98310
RE: Soils Investigation, Bay View East, Sheridan Avenue
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to the "Uniform Building Code" Section 2905 {c), the following
is a report of a foundation investigation at the subject property.
A sketch of the subject property with soil test hole locations shown
is enclosed. The soil found in each of the three locations is sandy
silt. Holes were dug to a depth of four feet in uniform soil conditions.
No ground water was found in any of the test holes.
As recommended in the U.B.C. Tables Nos. 29-A and 29-B, soils of this
type have an allowable foundation pressure of 1500 lbs/sq.ft. and the
foundation for the two story structures planned for this site are:
Wall thickness - 8 inches
Footing width - 15 inches
Footing thickness - 7 inches
Footing depth - 18 inches
Expected total and differential settlement is none.
Very truly yours,
RAMETRIX, INC.
MC� Ild
rl F. Reichhardt, P.E.
R/cf
-losure
LY'MA
Consultants in Engineering and Environmental Sciences
Parametrix, Inc. Post Office Box 279 Sumner, Washington 98390
Seattle 206o838o9810 Tacoma 20608635128
i
TEST yoL E`2
{
TEST MOLE
.S ,l/ E .2
•U
ORDIN11NCh NO.
AN 01U)IN11NCL amending the use and area maps
according to Ordinance No. 1792.
' (I3ogess/11Uchardson)
T1JL•'•.CITY.OF B111liME"HTON DOLTS ORDAIN: ,
00
SECTION 1. '1'liat the use and area reaps of Ordinance
co No. 1792, be and they hereby are, ariiended in conformity with
00
Title IV, Chapter 1 thereof as follows:
The North half of the North half of.` the Northeast
quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 2,
Township 29 North, Range 1 East, W.H., except State
Highway 21 B and except the l.:aster.l.v 350 feet thereof,
situate in Kitsap County, Washington.
Also Lot 13, Waltenburg Addition.
Be and the same Hereby is reclassified from R;2sidenti:al-1 (R-7.)
to Residential -2 (R-2) subject to the following restrictions:
(1) Developer and su))secluent a.nncirs are hereby restricted
from nrovidinq any driveway, inciress, egzeSs
or other access from the proposed development
to either Hanford or Pearl Streets;
(2) Developer must provide adequate screuiing for all surrowiding
homeowners in the form of vegetation, either
existing or transplanted,'and in the case of
particularly close proximity (10 feet- or less
between the property line and.proposed structure
or parking lot) provide a six foot fence to
protect the interests of both the homeowner and
the developer.
(3) Subject rezone shall be d(velopo-A ao.ording to site plan...
APPROVED•by the City Council on the first reading
this day of November, 1.979.
PISSED by the City Council of the City of -Bremerton,
Z.
•..••,--&,(jne.d .rJy►.the_ Mayor and attested by the City Clerk in
.'..�'".J10 pntiCa�ion of such Massage this /,3rday of L o,"r'!)tl J -r 1979.
-�• ,�<<„a►` '•4,. GLENN K: jARSTAD --- 7 Mayor
•�tri. •......•••' • •� �••
s
G. C. Y , ON, Sr., City Clert;
r'Ucd for rcccnd h� �'c_, l n7 :2t
'4 FIO`d`El� ill�T'�,I TIT�.E INS CO L '4F
R� u TED WRiGH , hitsip 0U(Q AddirorcRCI G� Ffi ��t�
- 1.- •
-,'
ORDINANC$ No. / %
AN ORDINANCE CREATING ZONING DISTRICTS TO BE APPLIED
CITYWIDE IN WIIICH SPECIFIC LAND USES ARE PERMITTED;
PRESCRIBING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DENSITY CONTROLS;
PRESCRIBING PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR TIIE GRANTING
OF VARIANCES, SPECIAL USE PERMITS AND OTHER LAND USE
ACTIONS; INCLUDING PROVISIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION,
ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES; AND REPEALING ORDINANCE
NO. 1792.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton staff, Planning Commission and City
Council have concluded the development of a new Zoning Ordinance, consisting
of a map and text, and have conducted numerous study sessions and public
hearings and have carried out an extensive notification process to ensure
maximum public awareness and participations now therefore
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN,
SECTION 1, That the document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
entitled "Zoning Ordinance of the City of Bremerton, Washington".is
incorporated herein and hereby adopted as Chapter 21.16 of Title 21 of
the Bremerton Municipal Code.
SECTION 2. That the map entitled "Zoning Map - Bremerton, Washington",
attached hereto as Exhibit "B", is incorporated herein and hereby adapted.
SECTION 3. That Ordinance No. 1792, entitled "Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Bremerton, Kltsap County, Washington" and all amendments thereto,
except Ordinances No. 3136, 3421, 3429, 3451, 3543, 3546, 3552, 3636, 4067,
and 4168, are hereby repealed.
SECTION 4. That a six-month period will immediately follow adoption
of this Ordinance to provide for further review, correction of zoning errors,
and completion of unresolved or additional concerns including, but not limited
to, hasardous waste and time limits for the processing of permits and
responding to complaints.
APPROVED on the first reading this � 8 '� day of , 1988.
PASSED on second reading by the Bremerton City Council, thie iTT`
day of 6G-ku IO. " , 1988.
HANK WAIDEL, President
City Council
APPROVED this day of 1988.
ATTEST, E E LODE, Mayor
KATHLEEN L. MCCLUSKEY
City Clerk
PUBLISHED,
PUBLICATION DATE 10 11Irl
ORDINANCE NUMBER y 17 - -
:' y or ; -{�' f..p � �.� �. `� - y rv.kt+ � �, ri'Nlr; � ` :.r, t i� � � a T t 7 ¢ a j • � �. .:
YLr`7_.v...�_.rM,.f ._& r u:... ...�. ��. ,-. .�._.., .+ �� i� �, Vii.. � fv T r: r n. - i t' i ..-r� ,.... ,. �. 'r. i .- � .... .. ..
<.... _ .,, � . _ ....... � : � : ! :..4. s ,fx.,. X� r :. moi' �t • ..
" OL7Y MC•
OLENN K. JARSTAD
MA'IOK AND COMMISSIONER
OF PUBLIC MIALT14 AND SAFM.
ROBERT B. STEWART
COMMISSIONER
OF FINANCE ANO ACCOUNTING
a
WASHINGTON •� ; i"6.
e ' v"71 ``� '� f�• 239 FOURTH STREP
To: The Building Department
March 1,. 1976
Re: Letter of Approval P.H.D. Inc. - Bayview East - Phase II,
620 Sheridan Road
FRED 8. SCHONEMAt
COMMISSIONER
OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITII
Q C. YEADON. SR.
el" CU
AND VU RCMASINOR. AGEIIT
The proposed 20 unit apartment complex, to be located on the 2.52 acres
directly north of the approved Bayview East - Phase 1, meets the require-
ments of the R-1 section of the zoning ordinance.
Notice was given to nearby residents on August 21„ 1975 as required by
Section 328.2 of the zoning ordinance. An E.I.A. was circulated at that
time. No written comments have been received. Mr. 0. Tripp of 3030 Pine Rd.
verbally related several concerns to this department involving the project.
The Fire Department, Water Department, Police -Traffic Division and
Engineers -have been contacted. All these departments voiced approval to the
plans as submitted to the Building Department, however -the Engineering Depart-
ment will require a sewer easement and fulfillment of the similar conditions
as those placed on the first 53 unit phase.
An apartment structure built at the R-1 residential density creates
greater common open space than would be possible if the area were platted
out in lots at the same density and single family dwellings built on each of
these lots. Therefore, this gives us urban. density and still creates the
openness that is a requirement of the rural environment. With multifamily
structures, a larger proportion of the natural vegetation will be left
undisturbed.
Approval is hereby granted in accordance with Section 328.2 of the Zoning
Ordinance 1#1792 under the following conditions:
1. The approval is based upon the Parametrix Inc. plan dated Aug. 4, 1975,
which indicated the westerly 140 feet of the site to remain undeveloped.
2. Clearing shall be limited to roads,
sept where selective clearing would
parking and building locations, ex -
improve views.
G RG�CE CHER
anning Director
Attachment: E.I.A., Aug. 21, 1975 •
cc: City Attorney
P.H.D. Inc.
0. Tripp
The Pea, rrs
HpaVifra�r THE PUGET SOUND NAVAL BASE AND SHIPYARD
~4L �.
orw.
HINGTON
WAS
o�w►+cK •239 FOURTH STREET"
gala - ,� t
`
GLENN K. JARSTAD FRED S. SCHONEMAN
'
MAYOR AND COY NISSIONER COMMISSIONER
OF /USLIC NEALTN AND SAFETY 01 ►U/LIC WORKS AND UTILITIES
ROBERT B. STEWART March 1, 1976 C3. C. YEADON. SR.
CONNISS1OMER ;1 _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ CITY CLERK
Of FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING AND /URCNASINO AGENT
To: The Building Department
Re: Letter of Approval P.H.D. Inc. - Bayview East - Phase II;
620 Sheridan Road
The proposed 20 unit apartment complex, to be located on the 2.52 acres
directly north of the approved Bayview East - Phase I, meets the require-
ments of the R-1 section of the zoning ordinance.
Notice was given to nearby residents on August 21, 1975 as required by
Section 328.2 of the zoning ordinance. An E.I.A. was circulated at that
time. No written comments have been received. Mr. 0. Tripp of 3030 Pine Rd.
verbally related several concerns to this department involving the project.
The Fire Department, Water Department, Police -Traffic Division and
Engineers have been contacted. All these departments voiced approval to the
plans as submitted to the Building Department, however -the Engineering Depart-
ment will require a sewer easement and fulfillment of the similar conditions
as those placed on the first 53 unit phase.
An apartment structure built at the R-1 residential density creates
greater common open space than would be possible if the area were platted
out in lots at the same density and single family dwellings built on each of
these lots. Therefore, this gives us urban density and still creates the
openness that is a requirement of the rural environment. With multifamily
structures, a larger proportion of the natural vegetation will be left
undisturbed.
Approval is hereby granted in accordance with Section 328,2 of the Zoning
Ordinance 1#1792 under the following conditions:
1. The approval is based upon the Parametrix Inc. plan dated Aug. 4, 1975,
which indicated the westerly 140 feet of the site to remain undeveloped.
2. Clearing shall be limited to roads,
sept where selective clearing would
parking and building locations, ex -
improve views.
7
G RGE - CHER
anning Director
Attachment: E.I.A., Aug. 21, 1975 •
cc: City Attorney
P.H.D. Inc.
0. Tripp
pThett Parrs
H�NIi�r&�r THE PUGET SOUND NAVAL BASE AND SHIPYARD
CITY OF'B-REMERT014
■ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT N
,--"• .... ,� .fin ��.�--.
Gateway to the Olympics and Home of the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
America's Most Liveable City
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
November 27, 1990
Bob Bergquist
Bogle & Gates
2 Union Square
601 Union
Seattle, WA 98101-2322
RE: 620 Sheridan Road
Mr. Bergquist:
In response to your request, the building permit file for 620'
Sheridan Road, Bremerton shows a building permit was issued for the
construction of a 53 -unit apartment complex in 1975 (copy
enclosed). We assume the buildings were built in conformance with
the 1973 Uniform Building Code, which was the code in effect at the
time the permit was issued.
The Planning Department informs me that the current zoning for the
site is multi -family (MF).
Please contact me if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,.
David A. Nelson
Building Official
DAN: j1
cc: file
286 4TH STREET ■ BREMERTON, WA 98310 ■ (206) 478-5275
An Equal Opportunity Employer
PERMIT CENTER
Department of Community Development * 286 4th Street * Bremerton * WA * 98337
(360) 478-5275 * Fax (360) 478-5278
November 18, 2002
KeyBank National Association
911 Main Street, Ste. 1500
Kansas City, MO 64105
Ladies and Gentlemen
RE: 620 Sheridan Road.
This letter is in response to Mr. Benson Wong's E-mail letter received on November 13, 2002. A
building permit was issued for the construction of a 53 — unit apartment complex in 1975. We
assume the buildings were built in conformance with the 1973 Uniform Building Code, which was the
code in effect at the time the permit was issued.
(1) The current zoning for this site is multi — family (MF).
(2) The Department of Community Development is currently unaware of any building code
violations on this site.
(3) Copies of final Certificates of Occupancy are unavailable.
(4) Enclosed figure 130 allowed density, set back's and height requirements. Figure 120 zone
summary. Figure 140 land use tables.
(5) Figure 670 (a) off street parking current parking requirements for residential uses.
(6) Copy of Section 21.02.800 Nonconforming Structures this covers what can be rebuilt under
loss.
Please contact me if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely
Patrick H. Conroy
Building Development Specialist
T7
MV
4j r
kr
.70
4,
ru FV7 d"t
�r
1w:
-k�
eu
OF
F, 17. 1
�12
Wrt ................... .....
4,1
=4
. tn=_
tit y7
J.,
77777�, ,
-P.
, AT
c'i
zi
.. .......
it
77-1—
TT
M
0
//N
GD rn
rn
—4
//N
0a - 0� OF
0, 04 (
Z,csv—e M F
PERMIT CENTER
Department of Coininunity Development 286 4th Sb-eet Biemelton ~' WA 98337
(360) 478-5275 Fax (360) 478-5278
Building Permit Application
APPLICANT: ❑ OWNER (CONTRACTOR ❑ AUTHORIZED AGENT
Site Address jQ6 .s,1,Ei l&97V ?-.a I Tax Account Number:
CONTRACTOR: 1/o�V5 6;9 -TE 6N5,9.
OWNER Address: go-, Ro)c 9,2/ S
Address: B QX 1//61/
City, State, Zip A5D&e)4 &JA -X Wrl - 13663
City, State, Zi `/', o�+,A IVA- -lT `lll
Phone #: 36Q (1/79) yY77
License # & Expir. Date: ilolvSGc9 X y
Authorized Agent Address::
Contact Name: , EFf-KE S, (°,)l
City, State, Zip
Contact Phone #: 36o '( y79) yzl77 Phone #: ( )
STRUCTURE DEMOLITION
Check the type of application for below:
❑ NEW MULTI -FAMILY
F-1 NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE f l NEW COMMERCIAL F7 NEW G
Qo 2002
EARY Pj
il
❑ NEW DUPLEX
❑ COMMERCIAL REMODEL
❑
NEW ACCESSORIBREMMTON
❑ NEW MANUFACTURED HOME
❑ COMMERCIAL ADDITION
❑
NEW SIGN BUILDING DEPARTMENT
❑ RESIDENTIAL REMODEL
❑ COMMERCIAL REPAIR
❑
STRUCTURE DEMOLITION
❑ RESIDENTIAL ADDITION
❑ NEW MULTI -FAMILY
❑
GRADING (Cubic yards: )
RESIDENTIAL REPAIR
❑ TENANT IMPROVEMENT
❑
OTHER
IS THIS PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FEET OFA SHORELINE?
YES ❑ NO [;0"',
Scope of Work Proposed: ^02&F Pr'ge 1g6i D YuSFlooX
3E7WEEA/ 157- F1.009
SECOND F1_06(Z ON
Ar% /N
/)9/9 S 7 z7X - l3 E o ROd M
4
Square Footage: Dwelling:
910 sq Garage:
Decks:
Valuation
Plan Review Fee
Permit Fee
Surcharge
Total Fees
7aov
®S�
Gj�-5
�5D
D- oZ�
Application for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and
plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official.
The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days on request by
the applicant showing the circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. No
applicant shall be extended more than once. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant
shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE:
6k_' --74v 4-(_4 ��. 2
DATE:
BREMERTON BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Inspection Report
Scope oAN9
work:/- Permit Number:
Address
Owner: Phone -
or: Phone:
7
Inspection card/approved plans on site
Footings: required steel placement
Footings: required width & depth
Bearing soil (soils analysis if applicable)
COMMENTS:
FOOTINGS APPROVED:
FOUNDATION
Setbacks
Walls: required steel
Walls: required size
Special inspector (wl
WALLS APPROVED:
co n suu^
:moment
applicable)
Electrical approved
Plumbing & mechanical approved
Crawl space access (min. 18 x 24)
Floor joists and beams/proper clearance to earth
Positive connections posts & beams
Foundation vents
Posts properly supported
Anchor bolts: nuts & washers in place
Mudsill: treated material
Floor joists: size & span
Beams/girders: size & span
Smoke detectors: all required locations
Notching & drilling: joists & beams, studs
Exhaust fans insulated: unconditioned space
Exhaust fans: where required
Whole house fan, outside air intakes each bedroom
Fans terminating directly outside
Range hood
Dryer exhaust vent
Fireplace combustion air
All vent terminations: windows & property line
Windows: proper U valve
Windows: meets egress requirements
Ceiling heights
Windows: safety glazed where required
Stairs: rise &run; proper width
Stairs: headroom clearance
Fire blocking: stairs, soffits,lowered ceilings
Fire blocking wall to ceiling, furred walls every t 0'
Fire blocking: tubs/showers
Fire blocking: lids in void spaces, shafts
Sheet rock backing
blocking: stuff holes top &bottom plates
lE
Rafters size/notching
bracing
Trusses: specs, bracing
Attic access
Attic ventilation
Wall & roof sheathing
Shear nailing
Building dried in
n
COMMENTS: 1'100e;z- fe4%04KG,y6-r
9ft-12 t 0 le IA )AL I In ,
APPROVED:
1=KJF:0 '=V nnnc nn■en1 I A Ll^.-
�-•�� �+vvL va„rmrL1I11YlrC
Insulation: proper R valve Insulation: proper fastening
Insulation: vapor barrier Bottom plates caulked to floors
Penetrations caulked as required Electrical boxes gasketed or caulked
6 mil black poly in crawl space
COMMENTS:
NDER FLOOR/FOUNDATION INSULATION APPROVED:
/ALL INSULATION APPROVED: CEILING INSULATION APPROVED:
15 (5)-z
MECHANICAL
Appliance location and access, proper supportAppliance
clearance to combustibles
Venting: clearance to combustibles
Venting: size & support
Vent termination
Combustion air
Ducts: size & support
Gas pipe under test
Gas pipe size & support
Gas pipe: underground min. 12" below grade
Gas, pipe: within 6" or underground -coated
Gas shutoff within T of appliance
Gas logs: safety shut-off
Gas logs: damper permanently open
Wood stoves EPA certified
Wood stoves & fireplaces: Tight -fitting doors
Wood stoves & fireplaces: proper health
Manufacturer's specs on site
Chimney liner: when required'
Chimney: separate flues when required
COMMENTS:
GAS PIPING APPROVED: FURNACE APPROVED:
OTHER APPLIANCES APPROVED:
PLUMBING
DWV & water piping under test
DWV` proper grade
DWV: proper sizing
DWV: proper drainage fittings where required
DWV & water piping proper support
DWV: required cleanouts
Vent termination
All fixtures vented properly
Water supply: proper sizing
Shut-off valves on all fixtures
Water heater gate valve on cold water supply
Vacuum breakers: where required
Water heater relief valve drain to outside
Water heater: seismic strap
R-10 pad under water heaterwhen required
Water -piping insulated as required
Grease traps/interceptors: where required
Proper indirect wastes: where required
COMMENTS:
PLUMBING GROUNDWORK APPROVED:
SHEETROCK
PLUMBING ROUGH -IN APPROVED:
Proper fastening nails - 7" o.c. horiz. Plane
Nails 8" o.c. vertical plane
Proper fastening screws 12" o.c. horiz. Plane (1/2")
Screws -12" o.c. horiz. plane (1/2') 24" o.c. framing
Proper fastening: screws -16" o.c. vert. Plane (1/2")
Screws - 12" o.c. vert. plane (1/2") 24" o.c. framing
Proper fastening screws - 12" o.c. horiz. plan (5/8")
Screws - 12" o.c. hodz. plane (5/8') 24" o.c. framing
Proper fastening screws - 16" o.c. vent. Plane (5/8")
Screws - 12" o.c. vert. Plane (5/8") 24" o.c. framing
Area & occupancy separation walls
Draftstops where required
Usable space under stairs (518" required)
Waterboard where required (not on ceiling)
Corridors
COMMENTS:
SHEETROCK APPROVED:
FINAL
Energy code requirements met, exhaust fans
Plumbing & mechanical
Garage/dwelling door self closing solid core
Smoke detectors where required
Handrails & guardrails, as required
Fire ratings maintained
Exit signs when required
Emergency lighting when required
Occupant load posted when applicable
Building weathertight /
Wood siding to earth separation (6")
Building address posted /
Randon monitor when required
/
COMMENTS:
0^z4 -
rut
Header
Stud
Drywall or `
Plaster----
Rough
laster-
Rough
f
Opening
Sill i
Plate
i
Exterior
Siding
Secti®n 19: Installation with Frame and
Sash Removed
Installations with the frame and sash removed require taking
out all of the old window components down to the rough open-
ing or framing. Common rough opening types are stud wall
(2 x 4 and 2 x 6 wood rough frarning), concrete masonry
(concrete block or poured concrete rough opening) and the stud
wall rough framing.
Installations into the rough framing can be done from the exterior
or the interior of the home but are more easily completed from the
exterior of the home. The same steps are taken for either the inte-
rior or exterior methods.
Stud Wall Type
1. Measure the opening that the window will be installed. Make
sure that the window will fit into the opening before removing
the existing window.
For Bryn Mawr /I double -hung windows: Remove shipping
clips only after installation is complete.
bng 6 Z) 5? F
TL
16 1OT46
Insulate Series
(200)
Single -hung
Slider, Picture
Drill locations illustrated
are approximate.
NW 44
Insulate Slimline
(400)
Single -hung
Slider, Picture
4. For Insulate Series windows: Pre -drill 3/8" diameter holes
completely through the window frame at the side jambs
every 8" to 12" where indicated, see drawings below. Do not
drill within 6" of the frame corners. Do not screw through the
sill; use a structural adhesive and/or trim cornponents.
For Insulate windows: Close and lock window vents.
5
4 16
Insulate Slimline
(550)
Casement
Awning, Picture
Insulate Series
(700)
Casement
Awning, Picture
Insulate Series
(800)
Patio Door
2. Place the replacement window into the opening to check the
F1 Lh
fit. Correct any problems before proceeding. If the opening is
firm and secure, remove the window and proceed with the
installation.
3. Shim sill as needed to level and provide support.
°w
�[�Q�® VED
For Insulate Series windows: The sill must have adequate con-
DZ
SGf
tinuous support. Secure sill to opening using a structural
1 . I'%
adhesive and/or trim components.
bng 6 Z) 5? F
TL
16 1OT46
Insulate Series
(200)
Single -hung
Slider, Picture
Drill locations illustrated
are approximate.
NW 44
Insulate Slimline
(400)
Single -hung
Slider, Picture
4. For Insulate Series windows: Pre -drill 3/8" diameter holes
completely through the window frame at the side jambs
every 8" to 12" where indicated, see drawings below. Do not
drill within 6" of the frame corners. Do not screw through the
sill; use a structural adhesive and/or trim cornponents.
For Insulate windows: Close and lock window vents.
5
4 16
Insulate Slimline
(550)
Casement
Awning, Picture
Insulate Series
(700)
Casement
Awning, Picture
Insulate Series
(800)
Patio Door
Bryn
Mawr II
Hung Windows
Q
W
Y
Bryn Mawr II
Slider �—
Windows ili
Bryn Mawr II
Picture
Windows
For Bryn Mawr 11 windows: Pre -drill installation holes in the
center of the interior sash track in the frame, see drawings.
above; use a 1/8" to 3/8" step drill.
For Bryn Mawr 11 slider frames with a weep pocket in the sash
track: Do not need to be counter --bored with a step drill. Drill
1/8" pilot holes with a standard drill bit for fastening. Locate
these installation holes approximately 6" from each corner and
spaced evenly within 14".
For Bryn Mawr 11 slider windows: Remove the sash(es) and
screens from the frame.
5. Prior to final installation of window frame, apply a thin bead of
sealant to the remaining exposed surface of the interior trim
extension jamb or drywall return where the surface of the win-
dow will make contact with it, see drawing A.
6. Place the window frame in the opening. Lower the window
onto the sill and center it; place the interior lower edge of the
sill tight against the window stool. Firmly press the window
frame into the sealant.
NW 45
CAUTION: Do not fasten the replacement window frame through the
sill. This will reduce the performance of the window, as it is a poten-
tial source of water leakage.
7. Shims are required at all fastening points. Using the pre -drilled
Slider window
holes in the frame interior sash track, fasten one of the upper
A Frame/Sash Reveal
corners of the jamb to the window framing. Hold the window
tightly against the stop while fastening.
8. After the window frame has been temporarily secured in .the
upper the for the
corner, check window jambs plumb and sill
for level. Check the jambs to assure that the are equally
� y
lilt i
straight. Do not twist the window frame in the opening. Check it
_---_=
for square using a diagonal measurement from the top corners
—� <-B Casement
Frame/Sash
to the opposite bottom corner. Diagonal measurements must
pp g
—�- ;-K- A Reveal
be within 1/4" of each other. Make adjustments if necessary and
verify measurements.
For Bryn Mawr 11 slider windows: Replace the sash(es) into the
frame.
9. Close the sash or sashes against the frame, leaving a small gap,
and check the reveal between the sash and frame, see drawing
----.._
B. Adjust the frame until the reveal is even along the. entire open-
If
>l _
Ing. necessary, level the sill using a continuous shim.
Hung window B -B
Frame/Sash Reveal
NOTE. The sill of the rough opening must be in a continu-
ous level condition for proper, support the entire length of
the vinyl window sill. If the rough opening sill is not level,
the sill plate itself should be leveled or a continuous shim
may be used.
NW 45
Interior Exterior
Fastener
Location,,
Installation
Hole Cover
0
NW 46
10. Shim at all fastening points. Secure the frame iambs by plac-
ing a minimum of 3 screws through 1/8" pre -drilled holes in
the jambs. Use #8, corrosion resistant type round or pan head
screws.
Fasteners must penetrate the rough framing by a minimum of
1 ". Place fasteners at the upper and lower jamb ends (within
6" of sill and head) and in a continuous manner every 14". Do
not over -tighten fasteners.
For fixed windows: Fasteners must be placed every 14".
For slider windows: Fasten at the meeting stiles.
For hung windows: Fasten at the meeting rails.
IMPORTANT: Especially for hung and casement style windows,
the jambs must be installed straight and not bowed. The vertical
reveal between the sides of the sash(es) must be even between the
frame jambs and the sash(es) the entire length from top to bottom.
If the frame is installed bowed, it will impede the movement of the
sash(es).
For Bryn Mawr 11 double -hung windows: Installation screw
heads must be flush with balance pocket wall for clearance of
balance mechanism of hung windows.
11. Again check that the jambs are straight and the window is
square and level in the opening. Shim and fasten at the head.
Do not bow the frame.
12. Cover the installation holes with high-performance sealant and
tap in the installation hole covers, see drawing A.
This step is not necessary for Bryn Mawr II with a weep pock-
et in the sash track.
13. Insulate the gap around the window between the replacement
window frame and the existing opening.
CAUTION: To insulate, pre-cut strips of fiber glass insulation are
recommended. If using spray -in type foam insulation, use only
non -expanding professional grade with a trigger spray gun. Do not
over pack; this will cause the frame to distort causing operating and
performance problems.
For Bryn Mawr 11 double -hung windows: Remove shipping clips.
14. Apply a corner bead of sealant around the entire replacement
window frame where it meets the interior extension jamb or
drywall return; tool the bead smooth.
For more information on interior and exterior trimming out, refer to
Section 21, Finishing.
Exterior Interior
d
°
° d
Sealant Adhesive New Fastener
Masonry Wood
Sealant Frame
With frame and sash removed - concrete masonry
or masonry veneer
Determine first if the wall type is concrete masonry or masonry
veneer. If the wall is concrete masonry, a few extra steps must be
taken in addition to the general rough framing type installation.
1. With the frame and sash of the old window removed, there
should be an exposed wood stud frame around the rough
opening to which the old window was fastened, drawing A.
Examine the wood stud frame for damage, cracking, moisture
damage, dry rot, etc. If there is damage to the framing, com-
pletely remove it and replace it with new stud framing.
2. If the existing wood stud framing is not damaged, it can be
used to install the replacement window. Place a bead of
masonry sealant to the exterior perimeter of the stud framing
where it meets the concrete. Be sure that there is a good seal.
3. If the wood stud frame around the rough opening is
damaged, completely remove it. If there is no wood stud
frame surrounding the old window, then one must be
installed. Remove all of the debris on the surface of the
concrete masonry rough opening and install a new wood
stud frame around the perimeter of the rough opening. A
wood stud frame is usually 2" x 4" construction (drawing B),
but the width dimension is up to the installer. Be sure the
width dimension is thick enough for the attachment of the
replacement window fasteners.
4. The new wood stud framing must be sealed against the
concrete masonry rough opening using masonry adhesive
sealant. Place a generous bead of masonry adhesive sealant
around the perimeter of the concrete rough opening where the
wood framing will be seated.
5. Place the wood framing into the opening over the adhesive
sealant. Seat the wood framing into the adhesive sealant,
making sure of a good seal.
6. Fasten the wood framing to the concrete masonry with ram
set nails or concrete masonry screws long enough to pene-
trate the concrete by a minimum of 1 ", drawing B.
7. Place a bead of masonry sealant: to the exterior perimeter of
the stud framing where it meets the concrete. Be sure that
there is a good seal.
8. The replacement window is ready for installation. Follow
instructions for your window style installation into a rough
opening with,the frame and sash removed as described in the
previous section.
NW 47
O
CD
0
0
:0
0
0
LO -1
w
cc
0
0
m
C)
x
0
m
77---
77
C�4
04
0 z
�
v0 M
r
0 CA
00
N IJM
L
0
CA
CN
�l
0 Lj
zs
ED
to
Or
0
2
NI
m
'o
lo
m
Gj
m
m
0
9
o )
K X
0 C'A
00
,
t -A
LO -1
w
cc
0
0
m
C)
x
0
m
77---
77
C�4
C>4
u ^� w i � i-�I /-� I
�
v0 M
r
0 CA
00
N IJM
L
0
CA
77---
77
C�4
C>4
C) Z
cr)
r
0 CA
00
L
L
L
CA
0 ly
0 Lj
zs
ED
Or
0
2
NI
m
jG-,
lo
Gj
m
o )
K X
,
77---
o)
C�4
cr)
r
0 CA
00
L
L
L
CA
0 ly
0 Lj
zs
ED
2
NI
m
jG-,
lo
Gj
o )
K X
,
----------
o)
cr)
r
0 CA
00
L
L
L
----------
o)
cr)
r
CA
----------
0 ly
0 Lj
zs
FORAGE,
CIO
TORAGE
O
3 z
m
C)
!0-
o
73
at
rs
r
m
r
�,
12 1:
O
p
m:
.0 ry
76:
1 STOVE
1
.. 1 11 .
: . : r
rn
>
V.
yk
C,
1�
CA
o
at
rs
r
r
�,
12 1:
2
m:
.0 ry
76:
V.
yk
C,
1�
CA
o
r
�,
12 1:
V.
yk
C,
1�
CA
� g o o s�q 8
MIT ENTER
COMMERCIAL
Building Permit Application
Department of Community Development * 345 - 6th Street, Suite 600 * Bremerton, WA 98337-1873
(360) 473-5275 * Fax (360) 473-5278 * www.ci.bremerton.wa.us
Business Name: Bayview East Apartments
Site Address: 620 Sheridan Road, Bremerton, WA 98310_
To apply for a property address, contact Public Works at (360) 473-5270
CONTRACTOR: South Tacoma Glass, Inc. OWNER: Northwest Apartments
Address: 8915 Lakeview Ave SW Address: PO Box 4215
Cit , State, Zip: Lakewood, WA 98499 City, State, Zip: Federal Way, WA 98063
License # & Exp. Date SOUTHG014L9 8/31/09 Phone #: 253-946-0374
Contact Name: Guy Hemley/Mike Moen Authorized Agent Name: Lee Chaffee
Contact Phone #: 253-582-2401 Address: Suite 102
Email address: lass u st comcast.net City, State, Zip: Same as above
Tax ID/Parcel #: 4585-000-009-006 Phone #: ( )
0 Sewer ❑ Septic Email address:
What is theapplicatfortif
far?(iPleas ch;k) ;❑ New':Construction X❑' Afteratiar❑Adcilttcin
❑ NEW COMMERCIAL
❑ COMMERCIAL REMODEL
❑ COMMERCIAL ADDITION
❑ COMMERCIAL REPAIR
❑ NEW MULTI -FAMILY
x❑ TENANT IMPROVEMENT WITH WORK FOR MULTI FAMILY
❑ TENANT IMPROVEMENT WITHOUT WORK
❑ NEW SIGN
❑ GRADING (Cubic Yards:.
❑ REROOF � n
❑ DEMOLITION Interior Exterior** Foundation Wall** Roof /Section**
*` Separate demolition permit and fees required.
Contact Public Works for sewer cap permit (473-5270). Sewer must be capped prior to demolition permit issuan BRF.iV1 �PT0N-QFPT C'r
❑ OTHER:
OMMiUNITY DEVELOPIUIEN-
IS THIS PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SHORELINE? YES ❑ NO x❑
Scope of work proposed: Replace all windows and patio doors to meet all codes and requirements of
Puget Sound Energy and the City of Bremerton
Square Footage: Building
1924
Construction Type:
Valuation
Plan Review Fee Permit Fee
Surcharge
Total Fees
14,168.76
_T ai
IDJ
Application for which no permit is issued within 180 days Ilowing the date of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data
submitted for review may there rob e returned t h plicant or destroyed by the building official. The building official may extend the time
for action by the applicant for perid not c i 80 days on request by the applicant, showing the circumstances eyond the ntrol of the
applicant have prevented ion from n k . No applicant shall be extended more than once. In order to rene action on a ' pplic ' n
after expiration, the ap ant shat i ans and pay a new plan review fee.
Applica 13igna a Date
Rev. July 2008
Kitsap County Assessor's Property Report
Property Report
Tax Account No. Process No. Situs Address
14585-000-009-0006 1712025 620SHERIDAN RD
Property Class: 137- 50+ units
Parcel Information
:Tax Code Area: 10060 1# of Buildings:
Jurisdiction: IBREMERTON Acres:
Sec-Twp-Rng: 102 24N 1E Zoning:
Ne ghcftgd..:_ 18100507 Account Status:
a..
Taxpayer Information
Name:
Mailing
.Address:
NORTHWEST APARTMENTS INC
PO BOX 4215
PEDERAL WAY WA 98063
t
11111 /kC\v1)1)uh2.Co kit",91-1 Nva _nn
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF BREMERTON
PERMIT NUMBER: BB08 00598
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE ISSUED: 09/30/2008
345 - 6th Street, Bremerton, WA 98337
(360) 473-5275 Fax: (360) 473-5278
ASSESSOR NUMBER: 4585-000-009-0006 ZONING: R10 SITE ADDRESS: 620 SHERIDAN RD
APPLICANT NAME: NORTHWEST APARTMENTS INC PHONE: (253) 946-0374 ADDRESS: PO BOX 4215, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063
OWNER NAME: NORTHWEST APARTMENTS INC PHONE: (253) 946-0374 ADDRESS: PO BOX 4215, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063
CONTRACTOR: SOUTH TACOMA GLASS PHONE: (253) 537-7132 ADDRESS: 8915 LAKEWOOD, LAKEWOOD, WA 98499
LENDER NAME: PHONE: 0- ADDRESS:
SUBMITTED: 09/25/2008 APPROVED: 09/25/2008 EXPIRATION: 03/29/2009 STATUS: ISSUED
VALUATION: $14,169.00 Building Permit - No Mechanical/Plumbing
Building Permit $212.00 2211 BAYVIEW EAST APTS. - NEW WINDOWS & PATIO DOORS
State Surcharge $4.50 0236 Building Code Edition: IBC: 2006
TOTAL FEES: $216.50 Occupancy Group:
Type of Construction:
Flood Zone:
Setbacks: (Front) (Side) (Rear) (Other)
Sanitation Method:
Number of Bedrooms:
Square Footage: Bid Price from Applicant TOTAL
Inspection Requests Fire Inspections (360) 473-5394
DCD: Building Inspections (360) 473-5870 H/D: Bremerton, Kitsap County Health District (360) 337-5285
L.&I: Department of Labor and Industries (360) 415-4000 PW: Department of Public Works (360) 473-5270
This permit shall become null and void if the described and authorized by this permit has not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned
at anytime after the work is commenced for a period of 160 days. It is the responsibility of the permit holder to see that the required inspections are made. Failure to obtain required
inspections may result in stoppage of the work until such time that the permit holder can susbstantiate to the City of Bremerton that the concealed work meets or exceeds code
requirements. Any demolition, testing, or financial burden shall be borne directly by the permit holder. Failure to substantiate code requirements will indemnify the City against any and all
responsibility or liability connected with the construction. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and
ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel provisions of
any State or local law regulating construction or the performance of the construction. If listing the owner as general contractor, I certify that I am exempt from the requirements of the State
Contractor's Registration Law under Section 3, Chapter 126, La sof 1967. All revision to an approved plan require DCD review and approval prior to performing work. All building and tenant
occupancy permits are required to pass final inspection pn o permit ex . i btain a certificate of occupancy prior to use or occupancy.
I have read, and agree to abide by the conditio of this r m all conditions of zoning, building codes, and State and Federal laws.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR
AGENT: � D
PRINTED NAME: DATE:
CONDITIONS
City of Bremerton's approval of this application pertains only to the City's regulatory jurisdiction, and thus compliance with City
regulations does not necessarily ensure compliance with federal or state laws.
10. (DCD-01) DCD: Prior to performing any renovation or demolition work, Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
(Clean Air Agency) and Washington Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) regulations
require an asbestos survey be performed to determine whether there are asbestos -
containing materials in the work area or structure. The asbestos survey must be
conducted by and EPA -certified (AHERA) building inspector (except renovation or owner -
occupied single family residences). DC D: For more information, please contact Clean Air
Agency through their web site at www.cleanair.org or by phone at 800-552-3565 or 206-
689-4058. The L&I web site can be found at www.Ini.wa.gov/p-ts/asbestos/asbestos.htm.
11. (DCD-02) DCD: Validity of permit. The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a
permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of the Washington State
Building code or of any other ordinance of the City of Bremerton. Permits presuming to give
authority to violate or cancel the provisions of the Washington State Building code or other
ordinances of the City of Bremerton shall not be valid. The issuance of a permit based on
construction documents and other data shall not prevent the building official from requiring
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF BREMERTON
PERMIT NUMBER: BB08 00598
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE ISSUED: 09/30/2008
345 - 6th Street, Bremerton, WA 98337
(360) 473-5275 Fax: (360) 473-5278
ASSESSOR NUMBER: 4585-000-009-0006 ZONING: R10 SITE ADDRESS: 620 SHERIDAN RD
APPLICANT NAME: NORTHWEST APARTMENTS INC PHONE: (253) 946-0374 ADDRESS: PO BOX 4215, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063
OWNER NAME: NORTHWEST APARTMENTS INC PHONE: (253) 946-0374 ADDRESS: PO BOX 4215, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063
CONTRACTOR: SOUTH TACOMA GLASS PHONE: (253) 537-7132 ADDRESS: 8915 LAKEWOOD, LAKEWOOD, WA 98499
LENDER NAME: PHONE: 0- ADDRESS:
SUBMITTED: 09/25/2008 APPROVED: 09/25/2008 EXPIRATION: 03/29/2009 STATUS: ISSUED
the correction of errors in the construction documents and other data. The building official
is also authorized to prevent occupancy or use of a structure where in violation of the
Washington State Building code or of any other ordinances of the City of Bremerton.
12. (DCD-15) DCD: Smoke detectors required in all sleeping areas, adjacent hallways and floor levels.
Smoke detectors shall be hard -wired with battery backup and interconneted. Exception:
Smoke detectors installed in existing buildings may be solely battery-operated when
interconnecting would require the removal of wall or ceiling finishes.
13. (DCD-16) DCD: At least one operable emergency escape and rescue opening shall be provided in
each sleeping room and basement, with a sill height less than or equal to 44" above the
floor, minimum clear opening of 5.7 sq. ft., minimum width of 20" and minimum height of
24".
20. (DCD-22) Building Plan Review:
Code Compliance -All work in the City of Bremerton shall adhere to the current adopted
version of the following codes:
International Building Code
International Residential Code
International Fire Code
International Mechanical Code
Uniform Plumbing Code
International Fuel Gas Code
WA State Barrier Free Code
WA State Energy Code
WA State Ventilation Code
Bremerton Municipal Code
Check For All Washington State Amendments.
All Construction: All construction must meet or exceed the requirements of the City of
Bremerton Building & Fire Codes, including the 2006 International Building Code as
adopted and amended by the city of Bremerton and the State of Washington. Occupancy is
limited to the approved and permitted classification. Any non -approved change of use or
occupancy could result in permit revocation and/or Code Enforcement action.
30. (OTHER) This permit is to install new windows & patio doors only. Does not include any structural
work. If damage is found requiring additional work/repair, either revise this permit or submit
for a new permit.
MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
To request an inspection, please call (360) 473-5870 and be sure to provide your permit number, name on permit, site address, contact
phone number, and inspection type.
Framing
Final Inspection - Building
Page 2 of 2