HomeMy WebLinkAboutVehicle UtilizationGary W. Nystul CPA CFE
City Auditor
345 Sixth Street Suite 600
Bremerton, WA 98337-1873
360.473.5369
gary. nystu I@ci. bremerton.wa. us
CITY AUDITOR
February 27, 2015
Bremerton City Council
Mayor Patty Lent
The City Auditor has prepared the attached report reviewing the utilization of
vehicles in the city fleet. The project was included in the 2014 work plan.
The intent of the report is to provide city management with information and
recommendations to improve management of the fleet. Vehicles with low
utilization in 2013 were analyzed with observations about their use.
It was also noted that for many years city management has been unable to
promulgate current policies for the procurement and management of the fleet.
Please contact me if you would like further information.
Gary W. Nystul
cc: Director of Public Works & Utilities
Director of Financial Services
Chief of Police
Director of Community Development
Director of Parks and Recreation
Fire Chief
Purpose
Scope
VEHICLE UTILIZATION REPORT
This report is to review the use of vehicles in the city fleet for 2013. The intent is
to provide information to department managers for reviewing their vehicle
utilization.
All vehicles listed in the Cartegraph software as being on hand in 2013 were
included.
Objective
The city vehicles include automobiles, pickups, dump trucks, SUVs and similar
rolling stock. Many are used daily but some are used only a few times each year.
The objective is to determine the miles traveled in 2013 as an indication of their
use. The report is intended to assist the city in managing its fleet. Policies
relating to the management of the fleet of vehicles were also reviewed.
Suggestions for improving the management of the fleet are included.
Statement of Auditing Standards
This performance audit was conducted in accordance with Generally Accepted
Government Auditing Standards, except section 3.82 which requires an external
peer review. Those standards require the auditor to plan and perform the audit to
obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for findings
and conclusions based on audit objectives. The auditor believes that the evidence
obtained provides a reasonable basis for the findings and conclusions based on the
audit objectives.
Summary of Results
• There are several low mileage vehicles whose use/retention should be
reviewed
• There may be opportunities to look at sharing vehicles and other less
expensive methods of providing employee transportation
• Future funding for general fund vehicle replacement needs study
• Fleet management policies have not yet been adopted or updated
Background
Detailed records of vehicles and some equipment owned by the city are
maintained on a software program (Cartegraph). The data base information
includes a description of the vehicle, department and division it belongs to, date
purchased and license plate number. The software is primarily used to track
vehicles and equipment for periodic maintenance by the Equipment Services
Division. It is also used to record and charge the fuel purchased from the fleet
supplier to the vehicles and equipment which use it. This data base is maintained
by the Equipment Services Division.
Included in the data base listing in addition to automobiles, pickups, SUVs and
dump trucks are lawn mowers, trailers, a road grader and similar equipment.
Many of these items are included for tracking of maintenance. Other items are
included in the data base to provide a record for accountability. None of the other
items are included in this review.
Most of the vehicles and some of the equipment included in this data base are
included in the Equipment Rental Reserve Fund (ERR). This fund is for the
accumulation of funds to replace the vehicles and equipment included in it. Items
not included in the ERR fund must be replaced with money from other sources.
This review and listing includes all vehicles whether included in ERR or not.
The following table is a summary of the vehicles at December 2013.
CITY OF BREMERTON
VEHICLES
2013
Motorcycles
2
Automobiles & SUVs
62
Vans
13
Small trucks
40
Medium trucks
39
Large trucks
13
Dump trucks
9
Vactor's
3
Fire engines
6
Fire ladder truck
1
Ambulances
5
Other
5
Total
198
Methodology
In order to measure the annual use of the vehicles the odometer readings were
attempted to be obtained. The miles traveled is the most reasonable indication of
use. The fuel records normally would have an odometer reading near the
beginning of the year and the end of the year. However, in some instances of
limited use and few fuel records, the maintenance records with a recorded
odometer reading were also used. In both cases some errors were noted in the
odometer reading that was entered. An effort was made to interpolate readings to
make a judgment of the approximate odometer reading at the beginning or end of
the year.
The computation of mileage in 2013 for the fire department staff vehicles is not
reliable. The department uses a separate electronic fuel recording system. During
the first 10 months of the year there was a computer problem and the odometer
readings were not recorded in the master fuel report. Public works fixed the
system in November 2013. The best available information from the maintenance
logs was used.
OBSERVATIONS
One indicator of limited vehicle use is low miles traveled. The following table is
a listing of vehicles which traveled fewer than 1,200 miles in 2013. This is an
arbitrary limit which equates to use of a mere 100 miles per month or about 5
miles per work day.
ID Description
VEHICLES WITH LOW MILEAGE
Division
Mileage
1
1485
1983 CHEVROLET C30 ARMY
PATROL
2
0010
1974 GMC 5000
SEWER
17
3
2221
2001 MERCURY SABLE
POLICE SOG
67
4
0029
1990 KENWORTH BOOM TRUCK
FACILITIES
92
5
1891
1990 INTERNATIONAL w/5 yard dump /snow plow
PARKS DEPARTMENT
116
6
0364
1996 FORD F150 4X2 pickup
MUNICIPAL COURT
143
7
0077
2001 INTERNATIONAL sludge truck
FORESTRY
144
8
1408
1998 DODGE CARAVAN
CRIME PREVENTION
179
9
1468
1996 FORD CROWN VICTORIA (EVOC)
PATROL
186
10
2217
2001 FORD E250 VAN
POLICE (SOG)
191
11
0049
1994 CHEVROLET 3500 HD w/fire pump
FORESTRY
230
12
3022
2002 FORD F550 4X4 CREW w/snow plow
STREET
250
3
13
2140
1994 CHEVROLET K3500 UTL
FIRE SUPPRESSION
252
14
0009
1988 INTERNATIONAL w/5 yard dump
WATER MAINTENANCE
279
15
3081
1995 INTERNATIONAL BUCKET
ELECTRONICS
464
16
0358
1983 GMC 39C BRIGADIER
SEWER
508
17
0059
1996 FORD RANGER 4X4 pickup
WATER RESOURCES
519
18
1522
2002 DODGE STRATUS 4DR
DETECTIVES
568
19
3066
1990 INTERNATIONAL w/salt brine truck
STREET
657
20
0020
1990 INTERNATIONAL w/10 yard dump
WATER MAINTENANCE
686
21
80001
2009 INTERNATIONAL With Vactor
WATER MAINTENANCE
697
22
3021
2002 FORD F550 4X4 CREW w/snow plow
STREET
772
23
0006
2004 CHEVROLET COLORADO 4X2 P/U
ENGINEERING
850
24
0306
2000 CHEVROLET ASTRO VAN
WATER RESOURCES
1,023
25
3092
1988 INTERNATIONAL w/10 yard dump
STREET
1,080
26
1882
1998 DODGE GRAND CARAVAN
PARKS DEPARTMENT
1,116
27
1341
1999 FORD TAURUS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1,236
DISCUSSION OF LOW MILEAGE
A brief description of the vehicles in the table is present below. They are listed in the
order presented above.
1. 91485: Pickup that is kept at the Police pistol range which is near the Gold
Mountain golf course. It is used to haul targets and trash around the range.
Actual annual mileage is unknown.
2. 90010: Flatbed truck with two trench boxes loaded on it. (The intent is that the
truck is ready to go if water or sewer needs a trench box for an excavation.)
3. 92221 Sedan for use by the Special Operations Group. (This vehicle has since
been sold.)
4. 90029: Kenworth truck with a 38,000 pound capacity hydraulic boom mounted on
it. The boom is used to lift pumps and motors for the wastewater system and
other heavy items for other departments.
5. 91891: Dump truck that has been kept because it is fitted for a small snow plow
that is used in residential areas
6. 90364: Pickup assigned to the Municipal Court but used by Kitsap Community
Resources under contract to the city for operating the community services work
program. During 2013 KCR reported they had limited staff and did not use this
vehicle.
7. 90077: Truck with a specialized body used to spread sludge from the wastewater
treatment plant in the city watershed forest. It travels only in the forest.
8. 91408 Van that was originally acquired under the DARE program and is now
used by the Police department community services officer in the crime prevention
program
9. 91468: Police patrol vehicle used for EVOC (Emergency Vehicle Operations
Course) training. The training is usually at Port of Bremerton property.
F1
10. 92217: Van used by the Special Operations Group
11. 90049: Forestry truck with a fire pump unit mounted on it
12. 93022: Truck that can be equipped with different beds but is retained for the snow
plow that can be attached
13. 92140: Pickup with a utility box used by the Fire department for various uses
14. 90009: 5 yard dump truck used by the Water department
15. #3081: Large truck with a bucket used by Electronics
16. 90358: Truck tractor that pulls a 5,000 gallon tank trailer for use by the
wastewater treatment plant primarily in emergencies at a sewer lift station
17. 90059: Pickup used occasionally by water resources staff
18. 91522: Staff sedan used by the police department detectives
19. 93066 Flatbed truck with the salt brine unit mounted on it. The salt is used for
snow and ice control on the streets
20. 90020: 10 yard dump truck used by the water department
21. 980001: Vactor unit. This is a large truck with a vacuum unit on it that is used to
clean and maintain sewer and storm drain lines. It is parked at a manhole or catch
basin while the hose is run through the main to clean it.
22. #3021: Truck that can be equipped with different beds but is now used for its
snowplow attachment
23. 90006: Pickup used by engineers while inspecting projects and other uses
24. 90306: Van used by water resources which has recently been modified for other
current needs
25. 93092: 10 yard dump truck
26. 91882: Dodge caravan, the only city vehicle available for use by the Parks
department administrative staff and recreation program (six employees).
27. 91341: 1999 Ford Taurus used by the DCD staff
ANALYSIS OF SELECTED VEHICLES
A more detailed analysis of five vehicles is presented.
42. 0010 A 1974 GMC was driven about 17 miles in 2013. This vehicle has
trench boxes loaded on its bed. They are on the truck and ready to go if the water
or sewer departments need to dig a deep trench. With the overhead cost
allocation methods proposed for 2015, a more economical procedure may be
advantageous.
98. 1408 A 1998 Dodge van is used by the Police department for the Community
Resource person. This van traveled about 179 miles in 2013. If the employee
were paid at the current IRS mileage rate of $0.56 per mile, the cost would have
been $100.24. In 2013 the actual cost for labor, materials and sublet work was
$659. Dividing by the 179 miles gives a cost per mile of $3.68. Using the 2015
budget projection for overhead, the cost per mile in 2015 would be $6.99 per mile
or $1,635.69.
93. 2221 A 2001 Mercury Sable used by the Police department special
operations group had little use in 2013. It also had little use in 2012 and 2011. It
was sold at auction in 2014. There is no provision for fleet management to
annually review vehicle use and require departments to justify keeping those with
little use.
927. 12341 The Ford Taurus used by DCD has limited use. Since the vehicle is
stored at the Government Center, it could be used by staff from legal, finance, city
council and HR. These staff members have been observed using their own
personal vehicles for city business which is generally not reimbursed.
ABSENCE OF POLICIES
For many years internal audit reports have stated that the city does not have
current or sufficient policies to adequately manage the vehicle and equipment
fleet. The fleet manager has suggested policies for many years but none have
been approved. These deficiencies include missing policies:
-Requiring annual justification to keep vehicles that have had minimal use in
the last year. There is no policy in place that looks at the use of department
vehicles annually. Such a review could take place as part of the budget
process. Responsibility and authority for conducting such a review should
be established.
-Prohibiting departments from retaining vehicles that have been replaced
without specific management approval. Fleet creep, the process by which
vehicles are "retired" or "disposed of but are actually kept, is a constant
challenge. There are no policies which prohibit keeping "retired" vehicles
without approval of someone at the overall city management level.
Individual departments now can choose to keep vehicles. There is no one
designated to review that decision.
-Encourage shared uses. There may be opportunities to share vehicles
within a department or at a work site. For example, in the Norm Dicks
Government Center is an automobile "owned" by DCD which was used
1,236 miles in 2013. City employees in the Finance, Legal, Risk and City
Council have been observed using their personal vehicles for city business.
Most do not get reimbursed for mileage on their personal vehicles. The
underutilized DCD automobile could be shared with other city departments.
-Authority and responsibility for determining replacements. The
replacement of vehicles has worked but perhaps the process could be
improved.
-Administrative authority to retire vehicles.
71
FUNDING OF ERR
Analysis and management of the vehicle fleet includes not only an annual
assessment of use but the ability to replace vehicles when needed. Fund 510
Equipment Rental Reserve accumulates money for vehicle and equipment
replacement. Transfers are usually made annually to support anticipated needs.
However in three of the last five years there has not been a transfer to support
General Fund vehicle and equipment replacement. There have been transfers to
support replacement in the utility funds.
The water, wastewater and storm water funds have sufficient resources to ensure
their vehicles and equipment are replaced when needed. General Fund
departments such as Fire, Police and Parks compete with operating expenditure
needs of their departments and all the other departments funded in the General
Fund for vehicle replacement budgets.
At the end of 2013 there was a cash balance of $5.9 million in the fund but only
about 16% or $986,000 was allocated to the General Fund. There most likely will
be continued limitations of available money in the General Fund to support
vehicle replacements. A long term fine-tuned replacement schedule and a funding
plan should be developed.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Vehicles with limited use should be evaluated annually to determine if they
could be better utilized or if they no longer are needed.
2. Policies should be adopted to manage the acquisition, operation and
replacement of vehicles in the fleet.
3. The future availability of funding sources for general fund vehicles should be
explored.
11