HomeMy WebLinkAboutRental Licensing ReviewGary W. Nystul CPA CFE
City Auditor
345 Sixth Street Suite 600
Bremerton, WA 98337-1873
360.473.5369
gary.nystul@ci.bremerton.wa.us
CITY AUDITOR
June 24, 2015
Members of the Bremerton City Council
Mayor Patty Lent
Attached is my report reviewing the implementation of the rental licensing ordinance.
The ordinance, effective January 2014, is intended to address the condition of rental
properties by requiring rental property owners to be licensed. The review was scheduled
on the 2015 work plan.
The 2010 U S Census reported 8,552 renter -occupied housing units. The city does not
know exactly how many units are licensed since the software does not provide totals and
is not designed for owners with more than three units. It is estimated that approximately
5,400 units are licensed. The report observed that the level of staffing of the Tax and
License and the Community Resources was not sufficient to implement the program in a
timely manner. In addition, the report noted there are opportunities to improve the flow
of data in the whole process.
The assistance of the Jeanette Wischhoefer in Tax & License and Joseph Sexton in
Community Resources is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Gary W. Nystul
cc: Chief of Police
City Attorney
Director of Financial Services
Purpose
Scope
RENTAL LICENSING REVIEW
The City Council passed an ordinance effective January 2014 revising the
licensing of rental residential properties. This is a review of the first year of the
revised process.
The review included residential rental licenses issued during 2014.
Statement of Auditing Standards
This performance audit was conducted in accordance with Generally Accepted
Government Auditing Standards, except section 3.82 requiring an external peer
review. Those standards require the auditor to plan and perform the audit to
obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for findings
and conclusions based on audit objectives. The auditor believes that the evidence
obtained provides a reasonable basis for the findings and conclusions based on the
audit objectives.
Objectives
To determine:
• If the changes in rental licensing were implemented
• The intended effect of the licensing is being accomplished
• Participation in the police department landlord notification program
• If there are any observations from the process relative to economy, efficiency
or effectiveness
Summary of Results
• The TaxTools software is not adequate for the needs of rental licensing
• Using the censes as a measure, many rental units are not licensed
• Extra help resulted in obtaining over 500 new licenses
• Providing clerical assistance to both the Tax and License department and
Community Resource Specialist could help implement the program in a timely
manner
• Finding an additional 400 unlicensed owners would generate $30,000
additional revenue to support the program
BACKGROUND
In June 2013 the City Council passed Ordinance 5221 entitled "Rental Property
Registration" with an effective date of January 1, 2014. The ordinance requires
any landlord who rents, or makes available for rent, a dwelling unit to obtain a
rental license. The fee is $75 for one or more rental properties. The City Attorney
stated in the agenda bill:
There are residential tenants within the City living in residences that are
substandard and potentially dangerous to their health and safety.
Substandard rental housing also has a harmful effect on the value of nearby
housing and creates an environment which creates an increased demand
upon City services and thereby adversely affecting the health, safety and
welfare of the citizens of the City.
The ordinance also requires owners to participate in the Police Department's
Landlord Notification Program. In this program, the police department
Community Resource Specialist compiles daily reports of police activity and
notifies the owner and/or agent of police activity on their property. The
information includes reports of events such as assaults, burglary, malicious
mischief, unwanted subjects etc. The information is matched to addresses of
properties participating in the notification program. An email is sent to the owner
and/or manager reporting this activity. If the owner has not provided an email
address, a notification will be sent by mail. The intent is to be proactive in
dealing with rental property problems by giving owners timely information.
State law, (Landlord Tenant Act) requires a landlord to meet certain requirements
for the condition and maintenance of the rental properties, notices to tenants,
terms of access and other requirements. The ordinance also requires the owner
to declare on the application, that they are in compliance with the Landlord
Tenant Act which is found at Chapter 59.18 of the Revised Code of Washington.
The ordinance did not change any provisions relating to code enforcement. The
city does not inspect dwelling units for compliance with building codes or the
Landlord Tenant Act. Should a tenant have concerns about the condition of their
unit, they can contact code enforcement for an inspection or assistance. City
inspectors must be invited into a dwelling unit.
Landlord license applications are submitted to the Tax & License division of the
Department of Financial Services. Information is requested about the owner and
the addresses of all rental units including the number of units at each address.
Licenses are not required if the owner lives in one half of a duplex. A license is
also not required if there is no rent paid. Some have reported family members
2
living in housing units and therefore they are not licensed. Also, accessory
dwelling units are not licensed.
The 2010 U.S. Census reported 8,552 renter -occupied housing units in the city.
In addition, 1,109 units were reported as vacant, but available for rent. Assuming
these were the same rentals in 2014 they would total 9,661. The census has only
the categories of "owner occupied" and "renter occupied" housing units. As
indicated in the following table, approximately half of the total census units were
licensed. It appears there are many rental dwelling units which should be
licensed.
The following schedule shows the estimated number of dwelling units for each
size of property currently licensed. This is only an estimate because the city does
not have a complete list of dwelling units by property. An estimate was made
about the number of units based on type of structure, notation on the license
application, or units identified by the Community Resource Specialist. Only a
portion of the approximately 1,700 licenses active in 2014 were individually
verified during this review in an effort to confirm the exact number of dwelling
units.
Units/Property
Number of Properties
Dwelling Units
1
1,056
1,056
2
354
708
3
100
300
4
90
360
5
42
210
6
31
186
7
20
140
8
8
64
9
4
36
10
1
10
11
7
77
12
5
60
14
1
14
15
2
30
Over 15
29
2,188
Total 1,750 5,439
3
DISCUSSION OF ISSUES IDENTIFIED
SOFTWARE ISSUES
The TaxTools software used for rental licensing is limited in its ability to record
all of the desirable data for licensing. It only provides space for three properties
per license. Many owners have more than three properties and the staff tries to
combine entries into the allotted spaces. This precludes sorting of addresses in
any data search. It is also not in a compatible format that the police department
can import without modifications. In addition, there is no field to enter the
number of units in each property. The software does allow the retention in
electronic format of the license application and related correspondence which
could be helpful.
The software developer has reportedly been working for four years on improving
this product to allow for more addresses to be added. The software is also used
for the city Business & Occupation Tax collections. There is no information on
when the corrections will be completed.
The Community Resource Specialist receives the data from Tax and License in an
excel format. However, it must be reformatted for use in the landlord notification
program data base. Street addresses must follow a specific format. In addition,
the Community Resource Specialist must determine how many units are at each
address and the numbering scheme for each unit and then enter that information
into the data base.
The Community Resource Specialist also adds the name and email address of
property managers or agents to the data base. Although there are only a little over
1,700 rental licenses, when rental managers or agents and the individual units are
listed in the data base, there are over 10,000 entries. This is a substantial number
of items of data to manage.
DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF RENTAL UNITS
The 2010 Census counted 9,661 residential units and the city licensing process
has identified an estimated 5,439. Thus there appear to be about 4,000 residential
units which are not licensed. A plan should be developed to locate additional
unlicensed units. Some options to consider are:
• The first priority should be for the Community Resource Officer to
complete building the data base which includes the number of units for
each property. This will give a more accurate estimate of the number
of unlicensed units.
F
• The use of utility billing accounts is a possible source of identifying
property required to be licensed. (A test of 70 of 508 water meters in
the multi -family class identified five accounts that may not be
licensed.) This is a slow process but may be a source of additional
properties.
County real estate tax files could also be sorted by categories of
different occupancies. This data can be sorted by 2, 3 or 4 living units,
& etc. A comparison of some of these various categories of property
to licensed properties may yield additional properties that should be
licensed.
Community Resources sends out an annual verification letter to
owners to confirm their contact information and rental units. Tax and
License sends out the annual license renewal forms. Results of these
mailings could be shared with each other.
RECONCILE THE DATA BASES
There were several differences noted in the two data base listings which if
reconciled may change the number of units identified.
• Properties were noted as being listed in Community Resources that
were listed as closed in TaxTools.
• Several properties were listed in Community Resources that were not
listed in TaxTools.
• Some license numbers listed in Community Resources were incorrect.
• There is no routine established to share changes in licensing
information.
The use of two separate data bases, one in Tax & License and one in BPD
Community Services, is inefficient. Transmitting license data by excel and then
having to reformat excel is inefficient. Additions, changes and corrections must
be made in each data base by each office.
THE IMPLEMENTATION HAS NOT BEEN TIMELY
The Community Resource Officer received a listing of new landlord licenses in
July 2014. Eight months later he is still getting the data entered in the BPD data
base. Consequently it does not appear the staffing level in Tax and License and
Community Resources, along with their other duties, allows adequate time to
5
search records for unlicensed rental units or update files. Data sources such as
city utility bills and county property tax records could also be used if there were
adequate staff time available.
Temporary help was used in 2014 to assist Tax and License with the
implementation of the ordinance. The cost of this help was about $5,500 and
located over 500 additional owners generating $37,500 additional revenue.
RECOMMENDATIONS
There should be a search for unlicensed rental units by Tax and License. This
will require temporary help or assistance from other staff in the department.
Searching water utility accounts, county property records and landlords registered
with the police department may provide unlicensed owners.
2. Properties and licenses could be entered much sooner with temporary help. The
amount of time (eight months) that it is taking to add all of the new licenses
issued in 2014 by Tax and License to the police data base is not reasonable.
Property owners are not able to participate in the Landlord Notification Program
until their data is entered.
3. Create efficient ways to share and manage data. There are a number of data
related issues that should be discussed and resolved. One approach is to form a
working group of the two departments to explore the issues such as creating one
data base (such as on the R drive) or at least enable data sharing and or editing.
Another joint issue is how to compare the two existing data bases in order to
identify exceptions. Some mechanism to share data between the two departments
may be helpful. The Community Resources Officer and Tax and License should
share updated information with each other as it is received and from the annual
verification or relicensing.
4. Identifying 400 additional owners licensed would generate $30,000 additional
revenue to support the goal of improved rental properties. There may well be
more than 400 unlicensed owners. The exact number will not be known until the
existing licenses are completely entered and the data verified.
rel
� - O
0
i`C I CITY OF
BREMERTON
0
THE CITY OF PRIDE AND OPPORTUNITY
Mayor Patty Lent
June 24, 2015
MEMO TO: Gary Nystul, City Auditor
FROM: Mayor Patty Lent Yr
SUBJECT: Landlord Licensing Review 2015
Tel 360-473-5266
Q
345 6th Street, Suite 600
Bremerton, WA 98337-1873
This memo is in response to The City Auditor's draft Rental Licensing Review dated April 13,
2015. My staff and I generally agree with the issues stated but don't feel that the issues and
recommendations presented necessarily address the stated objectives of the review.
Objective: Were the changes in rental licensing implemented?
In June of 2013 the City Council adopted Ordinance 5221 that provides for the registration and
inspection of rental dwelling units. In addition to the business license required since 1999, the
ordinance requires that the owner register each rental unit owned and provide a declaration of
compliance that each dwelling unit complies with RCW 59 18 060 of the Landlord Tenant Act
and does not present conditions that endanger or impair the health or safety of the tenants.
Beginning with 2014 license renewals the additional items required by ordinance 5221 have been
required. Tax and license staff spent a significant amount of time over the first half of the year
preparing and processing the required forms as well as educating landlords on the required
changes and following up on applications with incomplete information. The implementation of
the ordinance identified changes/clarifications that were necessary to carry out the intent of the
ordinance resulting in the passage of Ordinance 5269 in January of 2015.
Objective: Is the intended effect of the licensing being accomplished?
As stated in the review the intent of the ordinance is to assist in the reduction of substandard
rental housing that has a harmful effect on the value of nearby housing and creates an
environment which increases demand upon City services.
Since the passage of this ordinance no owners have been cited for a violation nor required to
present a certificate of inspection. Increase in notifications to landlords of nuisance activity at
their properties has not significantly increased. Increases in notifications are related to increased
activity as properties have been added to the notification database upon reports of activity at their
properties. However, the collection of landlord information through the licensing program has
increased the timeliness of notifications in the event of a call for service at their properties
presumably reducing the response time in dealing with problem tenants.
Objective: Participation in the police department landlord notification program
The intent of the 2013 code change was to automatically include all licensed landlords in the
notification program. With that end in mind, information collected by the Tax and License
division is provided to the Community Resource Officer on a regular basis to add to the landlord
notification database.
Objective: Observations from the process relative to economy, efficiency or effectiveness
All of the recommendations from the review relate to this area. The recommendations focus on
the addition of staff to identify unlicensed landlords and to assist in the manual entry of data into
the landlord notification database as well as finding more efficient ways to collect and share data.
Response to recommendations:
The auditor's recommendations are focused on three areas: The search for additional unlicensed
landlords, the addition of extra staff to continue this effort and to assist with the manual entry
into the landlord notification database and creating more efficient way to share and manage data.
I agree with the recommendation to create more efficient ways to share and manage data.
To that end the Financial Services staff will take the lead in working with all stakeholders to
identify their program requirements and work with information services staff to find a more
efficient way of sharing information among programs. Relationships with city departments and
external agencies that collect similar information will also be explored. This effort is scheduled
to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2015.
The number of licensed landlords has increased by over 200 this year without the addition of
staff. Given the current level of effort required to identify rental properties I don't believe the
addition of staff in 2015 would be productive until the above effort is completed. Notifications
of police contact to landlords not currently entered in the notification system will not be
negatively impacted as the information collected by the licensing division is available for any
new licensees. Staffing levels will be considered during preparation of the 2016 city budget.
Given the lack of resources available to fund additional staffing I must consider the return on
investment of any staffing decision. As an example additional staffing to focus on the collection
to B&O taxes due would return up to $100,000 to fund city programs as opposed to $30,000
from license fees.