Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SCHLEY BLVD, 2231
i City of Bremerton PERMIT NUMBER: BE14.001.19 , Oho ' I Fire Department DATE,ISSUEth 11125/2014 Witter 91'1 Park Avenue,Bremerton WA.98337. SITE.ADDRESS:2231.SCHLEY WAY,LOT St. fi ESRTON (S60)473-5380 Fax:(360)473-5461 11 ASSESSOR NUMBER: l ' 5559-000.078-6001 ZONING: CITY Nome Phone: Address rlceess.Codc APPLICANT: IIERDMAN PLUMBING LLC 360-830-0997 P.O.,110X 4044: IlFU3E=..©DGWD •SILVERDALE,WA98383 OWNERS IIIGHh1ARK.IIONIESLLC 253=891 t388 16400 SOUTHCENTER'PKWY.ST'E2f0 SEATTLE WA FiN l KL tICAGG 11 CONTRACTOR: H1 RDtV IAN PLUMBING LLC. 36043.0.0997 P.O.BOX 4044- BFI13E-DBGWD SILVERDALE WA98383 LENDER:. SUBMITTED: 0II 7/08/2014 APPROVED: 08/18/2014. EXPIRATION: .05/24/2015 STATUS: ISSUED VALUATION: $1,550.00 Fire Sprinkler PerniitT3=D` FIRE'SP.RINKLER•SYSTEM IN,NEW;SER, FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN NEW.SFR Plan Check 538.35 BID11 'PRICE2 $59.00 "1 TOTAL FEES': S97.35 ' Inspection Requests:' Fire,Inspections (360)473-5 86' It is the responsibility of the'permit holder to see that the requ.ed i spections'arc made Failure to:obtain required inspections may result in st• oppage of the work until such time that the permitholder can susbstantiate to the City of: cm on that.the concealed'work:meets or exceedscode requirements I,herebycertify that;I have.read and ekanained o not Thermik ow athee sa'me,to be true and co,ect: All provisions of laws and ordinances,governing.this type.of work'will be complied with'whethers ecified t grantingrmit.does not presum+to c authority to violate or cancel provisions of any Statepr local.law regulating construction orthe performance , . p� of the construction; • / .SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT: PRINTED NAME: I i, � t� /Y 1 DATE' / Z.. I 'CONDITIONS. 's l.ofthis application'pe'rtains:only.to the City's regulatory-jurisdiction,.and thus.complianee•with City regulations City of iremerton. approval does'not necessarily ensure compliance with federal or state laws. 1. (FIRE-I3DA) Al 3D'compliant:fire sprinkler system is required. Ail Bathrooms required to be covered unless specifically exempt, All balconies,not waived during:plan review are required to be covered. A fire sprinkler head is required within4 of the top of the stove.'including ail spaces.withd'uei tired appliances. No.portion of the`plan review or inspection process exempts the designer or installer from the,spccifics of Fire Code or NEPA' i requirements. A bucket testis required. Cover Inspection/Ducket test is:dope alter.all other:trades,have completed interior work,but just-before the insulation' i .inspection. Final.Inspection%Testing is ONLY done when the rt.sidi.nce is turn key ready,;to;be occupied, ALL PERMIT DOCUMENTS.ARE REQUIRED TO'REMAIN ATTHE FIRE'.SPRINKLER RISER DURING THE ENTIRE INSTALLATION.COPIES ARE-ACCEPTABLE. 1 •Printcdsby;hlnugtjoy,'MnrgrcCan::I125/2014`02:56'E'tvi *Page I of3 e t 1 "1. , I . 1 , City of Bremerton PERMITNUMBER! .11E14 0011;9' ' .. ,......, FireDeport-intent DATE ISSUED: 11/25/2014 !F,,,o,,,,,,,• ,. . . . .. . . „ --- -• . .... . .. . . .. ,, . . . . ;Witrat. , - - - tlypar.4 Ayala e;Bremerton WA 9837, (3!0)4",i3r53.80.Fax:(360)47.3161. SITE ADDRESS 2231 SCHUEYWAY :LOT St i . i .. . ... . . , . 1, (FIRE-01) Life Saiety;:and:Fire„Protectirin systemsAtell„comply-with:• ,4__ _ ... .., . InterhatiOnal„'Fiii Cede(IFC)with Appendix, International:Bidlding-ICOilei(IBC), . . ,1 . • — National Fire ProtectiMVASSoCintiori(NFPA) ,1 Bremerton MiMicipat Code(BMC), Bremerton RoadWay,Standaida .Bremerton Municipal Utilities • Copies of ordinances can befeurid.on"the'citieS website'ot xr‘,v.wei,breinerton.wit.uS; D To contact the Bremerton Fire MershaPs office: Mike Six ni,Michael.Six@cLbrernenon.waMS'Or(360)473-5386 • . . . . ,.. Alt questions:-to beibinding'i„muStbe:-followed,With an,oinail.re-Opting;h question.and-must"ineltideeither'digittil,photOs and/dr drawings to show litith'existingerinditions'and propiiSerl'ehatigesiolleratiOns. ,. • The,inspection retains the right.to!moke',requirernent.1-niaraddreSserf during plan review ;In-roanycases:the-plan reviewer is not given adequate information to address el l'issucs.Thoonsite'inSpeetiOn'0*s for:a trne:representation of the project All projects require'a visible address during and,aficr construction Final fire Inspection will met-be-Signed:Off without oval id "--€ -I aridbsattle address,PleaSe'contOct:thePOlic„91Orks'Oeportinent'inr,:address'if rieed*(3§0)473.„;5,)q7,.. -,-. . „ . I All projects,are,required tohave lire eXtingtiiShers unless exempt by the of O fire:sprinkler system,withspack „ .--- 11.response heads. - !J, 11 All violations of code-and.teterenedif dikiintinis':iii,S12:5 fine perviolatiim.DeViOtirig,from the'appreVeif plans is a . .... .... „ , •, . . .:.:1 violation of the Fire/Building code.Any revisions need to be approved by the Fire Marshal .. . i : . , 10. (DCD-10) A-aeparate.,elpetrieallperitit:issuedlhro4gb.14abtar:kladitstriPa0Alyiarequired:for anY,n . eWonochfied,repoir;leplocentent,- A41- serviceinairttenartee„;-A:it„temporary;installations.-Eiectricalwork,is!inspectedby{Lik 1 otiiie,t0 cover tind'Abc,froming • ' ii ntspeulion.Contact L&I:tit„360-415-4000'Or„WiiI,W.Ini.wo.gpv;(BC9ii'19.28) 10. '1(DCD47), DCP'.Reinspection Fee:All approved plans printedthe. latildirig permit,arid thii4itiribilinSpection.Placard, requiredam: :M.1Se ,4* i ,. : ,. ..„: ,.,..: ....„,. . - on site for inspection„purpOseSand.Workte be.inspecterfshall be'eamplete'-and iOW:for'.inSpectiOn if an Inspection is'called' for and plans are not aVailable bn'site;or the work is not ready for inspection approval WilinOt,be.gninted.-1Maddition,-,a„re . linspection fcczwil i'he charged'and must collected' ,bythe,,Oepartment of COMMiiiiity'DeVelOintient.Priorip'apy,fUrther . - .. .., .. insp.eciions•beingperforrited.or approvals2,grdoteri, 10, (ner),(11) kSBEStOS-AND LEAD-BAED:PAIINT:, .ASBESTOS demolition‘Work Puget Sound Clean Air-Agency and Washington . , Department of Labor and Indiistries,(1.2iB regulations require an:ashestei-StieVeYbeperforined:to dOicon inc whi.ther thire are containingasbesto , materials-,m-the work area-or structure.-The:a8beStOs:Stirvey.:-tritiSt be condUctedbyand EPA certified ,., .. .... . (Ail...RA)-,building,,inspeetor.(exCept renovation or owner-oecupied.Single.familyrisidenees)',For„Mcire Mfortnntionp lease contact,Clean Air Agency through their web Site at wwwipscieanair:org or 552 or 206-$43--ftg)(i; 'The., Lezl yiebsite can be found at wWw.liti:Xvii:goartides(icenSing/L.icenSinglteq/AStiesteidderatilf asp.-: . I t - 1 :LC.:,tp-p40-.):PiONT:.A contractor or person ri.cctving compensation who ts performing renovation ri.pairs or painting on a residential building or a ehild:.ciccuOidfaeil itY.bpiltbefrire 1978, ,must be trained'ond:CertifiSbkamaCeredited'uoining proVider,Ond registered as-o Renovator by the Washington State Department p(Cornmerce-.:LeiOPBOsed Paint PrOgrarn. :For ' 1 further infOrnintien-Pleaso.conMeti The Department Of Commerce website at:www:eommerce.wa:goVilearl,or Call:.(360) „ . ., .. .,. 586rLEA 11(5323); ' - CONTRACTOR:,-A eontractor's.registration,,issUed.bY;Washingtdri,State:Dept..of Labor&'IndUstriesisreqtared for anyone i Who contracts or submits bids for. construction work including neW:constructioNalterations,.repairs;!or eitylatie"Wheseonsults- .: ... ... . ., or apperintenda,:irtiiitiiyea;„iipmciliabea,developsresidential property for sale,,or,-'!fl los:.houses..-contact:L.&IOC:(360)415r 1000 for information. .. l ig, (DCD4)2) DCD:'VeliditYnf.perrnit.the'iSsuance:or-grunting-:of a permit shall not be construcilOytie„o permit for or an approval:Of any -6+E-.. ...,..„,.. • .. 4+f- violation of any o F the provisions of the.WashingtOn State Il.;ilding,e0de or Ofanyotheriordinance"of the City BreMertrin. : 1 ..- periaits,presuMing.-tosiveauthorityto,Violatobt cancel Ahe.pirWisfertScif the:-Washington-State',Building code Or other. o City ordinances of the CiY, f Bremertair shall not be-Valid,The_isSUatiedof n, , perMitbased on.constrnetiOnlidocurrien&iid"Other 1t .„ ,.. -. -.-. : -,..,... _ daishall not prevent the.building official from reqtatingthe:Correction of.errors:in:theconstrtierion-doe uments.and ether- ciata.The building ciffieialis-also atithorizedio-preVent ocCupancY.Orule,of ti'structure:where„in,vicilatiowof the Washington I: State Building code or of any other ordinances of the City of Eltittheritaii. -., ... .. --. . . . It. (DCD,50) Final:InsP . . _.. Inspection Required k A11 building permits Shall haye'il"fiaal:frspection:performed:and approved by:the co of ;1114r. , Brenierton-Deptannent„of Community.DevelepiticiwOrior to'Perinif.expiptiom,The'failtire.to:-'reqiiiiSt'adinafiriSpeetiOn:* y fail tito-tO„obtOlit-firtel approval prior to expiration require reaetiVation:feeor a.new,permil'application,if mon.than-4 year itai:paased Witnnooctivity.. i IC 12, (DM14), DCD: Approved Plans Engineering;Site Plan Permit;aad-coaditipaa.stili Site and bEaVeilnble'fOrinspection. 44fr, $ Attybbangea:ta.marahall bc'epprOVedbeforeeeinstriferiOnis:Performed:„Architect:nrcagineer,Of reCiard;shall approve„tbe • 'eliangebefOreSUbmatiogOrevision,'AreVision is subject tii-ir reviSien-feelind.additional fieS-fbr:plan-reVieW.-and-inSpeCtiOns;. . . _• . . , Printed bk,i'MOUnijoy;:margrvion:tit25/2:01402:56Plvi- POse.2,,pf'1 1 • City of Bremerton: t � PERMIT N.UIVIBER. BF 4110119' Fi;re Department: 'DATE ISSUED:. •11/25[2014 �. %.. 41014:14i$71, 911 Park:Avcnue,,Bremerton,WA 98337 E. SITADDRESS 2231;SCNL"EY WAY,LOT,5i. - ( f (360)473-5380 Faz (360)473 SQfil • 13. (DCD-32) • Changes to Plans:Any changes to llans,shall-be app"roved befon.;eonstruction is performed,Architect or engineer of record shall approve`thc change;before;submitting:a revisions A revision is subject.to a revision fee and:additional aees:forpinn review and inspections, • MINIMUM INSPECTIONS•REQUIRED • • number,•and inspection type.Toregister for on-line inspection.uccess,vi5it the City's:websrte:at www;on.pmcrton.iv address,contni phone; To request an:inspection,plcasiCal)(360)373-538•6 and bespre•to, rovtde our permit:41000r,nam ;ci.bremertnn.wn:as. Ins ection` t p Desccirtion', e FIRE'-.FLUSH EIRE-:Fre Sp�inkler`Fttish .FIRE..-)HYDRO FIRE-:fire Sprinkler flydrostanc Test: • FIRE-COVER, FIRE F:rc Sprinkler/Fire Alarm Cover FIRE--BUCKET' FIRE-I3UGKET;TEST TIRE-FINAL; FIRE-Final'Inspection• • �.I ' €f€ is • k ' Mount}oy,.MEntretan:I'1/25%201402i50.Pkr Page 3 of3 1 City of Bremerton PERMIT NUMBER: BU14 00078 t 0 Public Works and Utilities • DATE ISSUED: 10/09/2014 w; 345-6th Street,Ste.600,Bremerton WA 98337 SITE ADDRESS:2231 SCHLEY WA\ iilyp::• ..! (360)473-5270 Fax:(360)473-5278 ASSESSOR NUMBER: 5559-000-078-0001 ZONING: CITY Name Phone Address Access Code APPLICANT: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC 253-891-4388 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE 210 HN1KL-OCA6G SEATTLE WA OWNER: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC 253-891-4388 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE 210 HNIKL-OCA6G SEATTLE WA CONTRACTOR: ❑ LENDER: SUBMITTED: 03/31/2014 APPROVED: EXPIRATION: 04/07/2015 STATUS: ISSUED Water,Stormwater and Wastewater Utility Permit Fire Sprinkler Inspection Fee $56.00 , Stormwater GFC Residential $1,019.00 GOV PERMIT N Wastewater Connection/Inspection Fee $52.00 General Facility Fee(Wastewater $3,801.00 SERVICE AREA BR Fund) OUTSIDE UTILITY AGREEMENT N Water General Facility Fees $2,511.00 PLAN ATTACHED No Water Connection/Inspection Fees $2,760.54 JURISDICTION BR TOTAL FEES: $10,199.54 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS No GRINDER PUMP REQ'D N RESIDENTIAL ISUS 1 FACILITY TYPE Single Family ERU/MULTIFAMILY UNITS 1.00 FIRE SPRINKLER INSP HRS 1 Started By: Date: Public Works Director/Designee: Completed By: Date: Date: Inspected By: Date: I. This agreement constitutes a Utility Service Agreement,pursuant to BMC 15.01.030. By signing below,the owner is requesting utility service as listed above from the City of Bremerton and agrees to pay for said utilities and any other fees and charges at the rate set forth in the City's rate table,BMC 15.06.015,Exhibit A"Assessments, Rates,Fees and Charges"as may be amended in the future and by any method acceptable to the City Utility Department consistent with BMC Chapter 15.07. 2.Utility Charges are the responsibility of the owner regardless of whether the property is occupied by the owner or tenant. Unpaid charges shall become a lien on the property serviced. This permit must be posted on the job site in a location accessible to City Employees.An inspection must be made prior to any work commencing and after completion of the job. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT: PRINTED NAME: DATE: CONDITIONS Printed by:Wolf,Valarieon:10/09/2014 08:27 AM 1 Page 1 of 2 • City of Bremerton PERMIT NUMBER: BU14 00078 11 Public Works and Utilities DATE ISSUED: 10/09/2014 I 0 345-6th Street,Ste.600,Bremerton WA 98337 �� � � SITE ADDRESS:2231 SCHLEY WAS , (360)473-5270 Fax:(360)473-5278 City of Bremerton's approval of this application pertains only to the City's regulatory jurisdiction,and thus compliance with City regulations does not necessarily ensure compliance with federal or state laws. 10. (UTILITY-0l) Locate all buried utilities prior to digging. The property owner shall bear all costs for damage,repairs or necessary relocation of underground utilities due to his activities. 40. (CROSS-01) A cross-connection(source of potential contamination to domestic water supply)inspection is required prior to final inspection. 50. (CROSS-02) Cross Connection: All irrigation systems for commercial or industrial facilities shall have separate service lines and separate meters. Residential and multi family facilities may install the irrigation system on the domestic supply. This requirement is in place because the wastewater billing fees are tied to water consumption.All facilities with irrigation systems shall have an approved double check valve assembly installed on the service line within(2)two feet of the water meter to proved premises isolation(when the backflow assembly is off,everything on the property will be without water).Systems with chemical addition or auxiliary water supplies will be required to install an approved reduced pressure backflow assembly within(2)feet of the water meter to provide premises isolation.Approved assemblies are assemblies on the current Washington State Department of Health approved assembly list. 60. (ENGR-1004) ENGR: All work shall meet City of Bremerton Standards. MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED To request an inspection,please call(360)473-5870 and be sure to provide your permit number,name on permit,site address,contact phone number,and inspection type.To register for on-line inspection access,visit the City's website at www.ci.bremerton.wa.us. Inspection Description PW&U-SEWER LATERAL PW-Sewer Lateral PW&U-ST PATCH PW-Street Patch Final Inspection , FIXTURE LIST Qty Fixture Type Qty Fixture Type 1 BR-1"DOM FIRE GFC 1 BR-1"DOM FIRE MTR • 1 LATERAL-P/L-BR • Printed by:Wolf Valarieon:10/09/2014 08:27 AM Page 2 of 2 • • City of Bremerton PERMIT NUMBER: BB14 00156 Department of Community Development DATE ISSUED: 10/09/2014 CITY o F 345-6th Street,Ste.600,Bremerton WA 98337 SITE ADDRESS:2231 SCHLEY WAY LT 51 BREMERTON (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278 ASSESSOR NUMBER: 5559-000-078-0001 ZONING: EPSAP Name Phone Address Access Code APPLICANT: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC 253-891-4388 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE 210 HNIKL-OCA6G SEATTLE WA OWNER: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC 253-891-4388 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE 210 HNIKL-OCA6G SEATTLE WA CONTRACTOR: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC 253-891-4388 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY#210 O5KXB-RN8JG Tukwila,WA98188 LENDER: SUBMITTED: 03/26/2014 APPROVED: 07/02/2014 ( 1 PI TION: 04/07/2015 STATUS: ISSUED • VALUATION: $146,900.22 Residential Building Permit w/ `hanical/Plumbing NEW SFR W/3,STALL G E FINALED q NEW SFR W/3 STALL GARAGE State Surcharge $4.50 . G Plumbing Fixture Fee $103.00 Building Code Edition: IBC:2012 Plan Review Fee $88L40 Occupancy Group: R-3/U ��;t Type of Construction: V-B SPR ' State Energy Code $50.00 '' � " `c . '"`• Mechanical Fixture Fee $95.60 Flood Zone: Building Permit $1,356.00 Setbacks: ////:(F/L/RT/RUO) Sanitation Method: .SEWER TOTAL FEES: $2,490.50 Number of Bedrooms: 2.00 Inspection Requests: FIRE:Fire Inspections (360)473-5386 DCD:Building Inspections: (360)473-5870 HEALTH:Kitsap County Health District (360)337-5285 L&I:Department of Labor and Industries (360)415-4000 PW&U:Public Works-Engineering (360)473-5270 This permit shall become null and void if the described work authorized by this permit has not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance,or if the work is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days.It is the responsibility of the permit holder to see that the required inspections are made.Failure to obtain required inspections may result in stoppage of the work until such time that the permit holder can substantiate to the City of Bremerton that the concealed work meets or exceeds code requirements.Any demolition,testing,or financial burden shall be home directly by the permit holder.Failure to substantiate code requirements will indemnify the City against any and all responsibility or liability connected with the construction.I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct.All provisions of laws and ordinances goveming this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not.The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel provisions of any State or local law regulating construction or the performance of the construction.If listing the owner as general contractor,I certify that I am exempt from the requirements of the State Contractor's Registration Law under Section 3,Chapter 126,Laws of 1967.All revisions to an approved plan require DCD review and approval prior to performing work.All building and tenant occupancy permits are required to pass final inspection prior to permit expi? on and obtain a certificate of occupancy prior to use or occupancy. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGNT: PRINTED NAME: �� /Q 1 /. Q./ DATE: /0 < CONDITIONS ) City of Bremerton's approval of this pplication pertains only to the City's regulatory jurisdiction,and thu's compliance with City regulations does not necessarily ensure compliance with federal or state laws. Printed by:Wolf,Valarieon:10/09/2014 08:27 AM Page 1 of 5 City of Bremerton PERMIT NUMBER: BB14 00156 Department of Community Development DATE ISSUED: 10/09/2014 I" CITY o F 345-6th Street,Ste.600,Bremerton WA 98337 SITE ADDRESS:2231 SCHLEY WAY LT 51 BREMERTON (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278 . (DCD-01) ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT: ASBESTOS:Prior to performing any renovation or demolition work,Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and Washington Department of Labor and Industries(L&I)regulations require an asbestos survey be perfonned to determine whether there are asbestos-containing materials in the work area or structure. The asbestos survey must be conducted by and EPA-certified (AHERA)building inspector(except renovation or owner-occupied single family residences).For more information,please contact Clean Air Agency through their web site at www.pscleanair.org or by phone at800-552-3565 or 206-343-8800. The L&I web site can be found at www.lni.wa.gov/TradesLicensing/LicensingReq/Asbestos/default.asp. LEAD-BASED PAINT:A contractor or person receiving compensation who is performing renovation,repairs or painting on a residential building or a child-occupied facility built before 1978,must be trained and certified by an accredited training provider,and registered as a Renovator by the Washington State Department of Commerce-Lead-Based Paint Program. For further information please contact:The Department of Commerce website at:www.commerce.wa.gov/lead,or call: (360) 586-LEAD(5323). CONTRACTOR:A contractor's registration issued by Washington State Dept.of Labor&Industries is required for anyone who contracts or submits bids for construction work,including new construction,alterations,repairs,or anyone who consults or superintends,improves,demolishes,develops residential property for sale,or"flips"houses.Contact L&I at(360)415- 4000 for information. 2. (DCD-02) DCD:Validity of permit.The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for,or an approval of,any violation of any of the provisions of the Washington State Building code or of any other ordinance of the City of Bremerton. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of the Washington State Building code or other ordinances of the City of Bremerton shall not be valid.The issuance of a permit based on construction documents and other data shall not prevent the building official from requiring the correction of errors in the construction documents and other data.The building official is also authorized to prevent occupancy or use of a structure where in violation of the Washington State Building code or of any other ordinances of the City of Bremerton. 3. (DCD-47) DCD:Reinspection Fee:All approved plans,the printed building permit,and the permit inspection placard,are required to be on-site for inspection purposes,and work to be inspected shall be complete and ready for inspection.If an inspection is called for and plans are not available on site,or the work is not ready for inspection,approval will not be granted.In addition,a re- inspection fee will be charged and must be collected by the Department of Community Development prior to any further inspections being performed or approvals granted. 4. (DCD-14) DCD: Approved Plans,Engineering,Site Plan,Permit,and Conditions shall remain on site and be available for inspection. \— Any changes to plans shall be approved before construction is performed.Architect or engineer of record shall approve the change before submitting a revision.A revision is subject to a revision fee and additional fees for plan review and inspections. 5. (DCD-08) Plumbing work shall be performed by a Level 01 Journeyman Plumber licensed in the state of Washington. \_ Residential plumbing work may be performed by a Level 01 or:Level 02 Journeyman Plumber licensed in the state of Washington.Single family residential plumbing work may be performed by the owner. 6. (DCD-10) A separate electrical permit issued through Labor&Industries(L&I)is required for any new,modified,repair,replacement, service,maintenance,or temporary installations.Electrical work is inspected by L&I prior to cover and the framing inspection.Contact L&I at 360-415-4000 or www.lni.wa.gov.(RCW 19.28) 7. (DCD-CO DET.(NEW)) Carbon Monoxide Alarms.For new construction,an approved carbon monoxide alarm listed in compliance with UL 2034 shall be installed outside of each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedroom in dwelling units and on N� each level of the dwelling.In a building where a tenancy exists,the tenant shall maintain the CO alarm as specified by the NIS • manufacturer including replacement of the batteries. 8. (DCD-FUEL COMBUSTION AIR: IRC Section M1701.1.Solid-fuel-burning appliances shall be provided with combustion air in APPLIANCES) accordance with the appliance manufacturer's installation instructions.Oil-fired appliances shall be provided with combustion :� air in accordance with NFPA31.The requirements for combustion and dilution air for gas-fired appliances shall be in accordance with Chapter 24.Fireplaces shall comply with Section 1001, APPLIANCE LOCATIONS: IRC Section G2406.2. Fuel buming appliances shall not be installed in a sleeping room, bathroom,toilet room,or closet.Exception: direct vent appliances(see IRC Section G2406.2 for additional exceptions). PROTECTION OF APPLIANCES: IRC Section M1307.3. Appliances located in a garage or carport or any other location subject to vehicle damage shall be protected by approved barriers.Appliances having an ignition source shall be elevated so that the source of ignition is at least 18"above the floor in garages and in any room that opens to the garage.Appliances designed to be fixed in position shall be fastened or anchored in an approved method. CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS:IRC Section 315.An approved carbon monoxide alarm listed with UL2034 shall be installed outside of each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedroom.In a building where a tenancy exists, the tenant shall maintain the CO alarm as specified by the manufacturer including replacement of the batteries. MANUFACTURER'S SPECS: IRC M1307.1.The manufacturer's operating and installation instructions shall remain attached to the appliance until final inspection 9. (DCD-52) DCD:Gas Piping:Fuel or gas piping shall be inspected after the installation of fuel/gas piping is complete,and before the attachment of fixtures,appliances,or shut-off valves.At the time of inspection the test pressure shall be no less than 10 psi held for no less than 15 minutes.Appliances to be attached to the fuel/gas piping system shall not be used until the final inspection has been performed and approved by a Building Inspector. 10. (DCD-56) Combustion Air:In buildings of unusually tight construction,or within a garage,all fuel-burning appliances,other than cooking appliances and domestic clothes dryers,shall obtain combustion air from outside in accordance with the International Mechanical Code,International Fuel Gas Code and/or the International Residential Code. Printed by:Wolf,Valarieon:10/09/2014 08:27 AM Page 2 of 5 City of Bremerton PERMIT NUMBER: BB14 00156 tM Department of Community Development DATE ISSUED: 10/09/2014 J CITY o F -jai, 345-6th Street,Ste.600,Bremerton WA 98337 SITE ADDRESS:2231 SCHLEY WAY LT 51 BREMERTON (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278 11. (DCD-04) DCD:Plan Review Requirements:The attached plan review checklist and identified corrections,along with the Energy Compliance Worksheet(when applicable)are part of the approved plans and must remain attached thereto.It is the responsibility of the applicant to make the corrections indicated on the plans.Once the plans are marked"APPROVED",they shall not be changed or altered without authorization from the Building Official. All proposed changes to"APPROVED"building plans that effect compliance with the City of Bremerton Building and Fire Code as adopted and amended in BMC Title 17 and Title 18,or any other City of Bremerton ordinance or regulation,must be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development prior to construction.Failure to comply and/or removal of attached documents will result in failure of required building inspections. 12. (DCD-19) Engineered Wood Floor Trusses&Truss Roof Systems shall have a site specific engineered design(Framing Plan)available ` at time of Under Floor and/or Framing Inspection. 13. (DCD-060) Property lines shall be properly marked.Setbacks are measured to the fnished wall of the structure. 14. (DCD-43) Under-floor Inspection:After the foundation is complete,and the floor system is framed,but prior to the installation of the ` 1 sub-floor or floor sheathing,(exposed floor framing)the under-floor area must be inspected,including all floor framing, anchor bolts,hold-downs and under-floor posts and positive connection devices. `; 15. (DCD-38) Shear Wall Inspection:Due to the complexity of the shear wall nailing patterns and hold-down requirements contained within the engineered lateral design,a separate shear wall inspection is required for this project.This inspection should be requested ,r and performed prior to the installation of exterior wall coverings,prior to the framing inspection,such that all shear-wall , nailing pattems may be observed,and the installation of all required hold-down devices and required straps,etc.are in place in accordance with the engineer's lateral design. 1 16. (DCD-50) Final Inspection Required:All building permits shall have a final inspection performed and approved by the City of as. _ Bremerton Department of Community Development prior to permit expiration.The failure to request a final inspection or le failure to obtain final approval prior to expiration may require a reactivation fee,or a new permit application if more than a year has passed with no activity. 17. (DCD-42) Geotechnical inspections and tests shall be performed in accordance with the geo-technical engineer's requirement and recommendations.All inspection results or density tests shall be piovided to the Department of Community Development prior to requesting any soils related inspections(such as footing or foundation inspections). Required geotechnical inspections: 1.Structural fill and compaction 2.Soil bearing 3.Retaining wall and rockery placement 4.Ongoing site monitoring during wet weather construction 5.Final grading 18. (DCD-58) To satisfy public records retention requirements and public disclosure requests,a set of as-built plans in electronic format shall be submitted to the Building Dept.before the final building inspection is scheduled.The format may be in.pdf (preferred),.jpg,or.tif electronic files and submitted on CD,flash drive or other acceptable method as determined by the information technology specialist.As-built plans include the civil drawings,site plan,floor plans,construction and structural drawings,and facility systems. 19. (DCD-51) Certificate of Occupancy:A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued for the building prior to use and occupancy.Please call (360)473-5870 to schedule the required final building inspection after the final Development Engineering,Public Works, Planning Department,Health District and L&I Electrical inspections have been performed and approved.OCCUPANCY— Certificate of Occupancy inspections by Building and Fire Departments after the occupancy is stocked and stored and before opening to the public may be requested by email.at Michael.Six@ci.bremerton.wa.us or(360)473-5870. 20. (LU31) Development must comply with the East Park Sub-Area Plan,Conditions of Plat Approval,and Title 20 in the BMC. No structures shall be placed within the setbacks,driveways shall not exceed 20'in width,height shall not exceed 35'from average grade to the peak of the structure,and all development not shown on the approved plans must be submitted for III review and approval prior to construction. , \ 21. (LU9) All driveways and areas used for loading,parking,and maneuvering motorized vehicles shall have a paved surface.Two off- ghat street parking spaces are required for every residential unit pursuant to BMC 20.48. 7, 22. (Custom) Each parking stall shall have the address of the associated home painted on the floor of the stall. 11.111._ MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED To request an inspection,please call(360)473-5870 and be sure to provide your permit number,name on permit,site address,contact phone number,and inspection type.To register for on-line inspection access,visit the City's website at www.ci.bremerton.wa.us. Inspection Description GEOTECH-GRADING Geotechnical inspection for grading and fill.Send report to Bldg Dept. GEOTECH STRUCT FILL Geotechnical Report for Structural Fill and Compaction,Soil Bearing.Send report to Bldg Dept. Printed by:Wolf,Valarieon:10/09/2014 08:27 AM • Page 3 of 5 i II PERMIT NUMBER: BB14 00156 t' . LL t City of Bremerton r Department of Community Development DATE ISSUED: 10/09/2014 I' CITY o F .`' 345-6th Street,Ste.600,Bremerton WA 98337 SITE ADDRESS:2231 SCHLEY WAY LT 5( BREMERTON (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278 r 1 FOUNDATION-FOOT Foundation Footings,Property lines shall be properly identified FOUNDATION-WALL"i Foundation Walls/Hold downs GEO ENGINEER FINAL Geotechnical Engineer Final Letter,Send report to Bldg Dept PLUMBING GROUND it Plumbing Groundwork 11 FRAMING-UNDERFLOOR Underfloor Framing Inspection/Anchor Bolts&Washers/Hold Downs SHEAR WALL Shear Wall Panels/Braced Wall Panels MECHANICAL Mechanical Rough-In PLUMBING-ROUGH Plumbing Rough-In GAS PIPING Gas Piping Pressure Test ELECTRICAL COVER L&I-Electrical Cover Inspection Before Framing(State of Washington) FRAMING �� Framing Inspection(Mechanical&Plumb Rough-In,Elect Cover Completed) INSULATION-WALL Ij Insulation-Wall SHEETROCK Sheetrock Nailing DRIVEWAY Paved Driveway&parking areas INSULATION-CEILING Insulation-Ceiling • INSULATION-UNDERFL Insulation-Underfloor ENERGY-DUCT TESTIN Energy Code-Duct Testing-Provide signed affidavit to Bldg Dept ENERGY-AIR LEAK Energy Code-Air Leakage Test(Blower Door Test) ELECTRICAL FINAL ! L&I-Electrical Final Inspection PW&U-SEWER LATERAL PW-Sewer Lateral PW&U-UTILITIES PW-Final Inspection-Utilities PW&U-DWY APPROACH PW-Driveway approach final PW&U-ROW OTHER PW-Right-of-Way Other INSULATION-SLAB Insulation-Slab FIRE-FINAL FIRE-Final Inspection PW&U-FINAL PW-Final Inspection-Public Works WATER-CROSS CONNEC WATER-Potable Water Backflow Prevention(domestic,fire sprinklers,irrigation) FINAL-BUILDING Final Inspection-Building FIXTURE LIST Qty Fixture Type Qty Fixture Type 1 0 C-AIR-HANDLING 10K+ 0 C-BACKFLOW<=2"DIAM 0 C-AIR-HANDLING 10K- 0 C-BACKFLOW>2"DIAM 0 C-BOILER<II 100K/3HP 0 C-BUILDING SEWER • 0 C-BOILER>L75M/50 HP 0 C-CLOTHES WASHER 0 C-BOILER>100K<=500K 0 C-DISH WASHER 0 C-BOILER>I M<=1.75M 0 C-DRAIN PIPE CHANGE 0 C-BOILER>500K<=IM 0 C-DRINKING FOUNTAIN 0 C-BROILER 0 C-EYEWASH Printed by:Wolf,Valarieon:10/09/2014 08:27 AM Page 4 of 5 11 t City of Bremerton PERMIT NUMBER: BB14 00156 t t Department of Community Development DATE ISSUED: 10/09/2014 it tt , c i T r o F 345-6th Street,Ste.600,Bremerton WA 98337 SITE ADDRESS:2231 SCHLEY WAY LT 5i BREMERTON (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278 0 C-CLASS I HOOD 0 C-FLOOR DRAIN 0 C-CLASS 2 HOOD 0 C-FLOOR SINK 0 C-CLOTHES,DRYER 0 C-HOSE BIB 0 C-COMPRESSORS 0 C-INTER-GREASE 0 C-COOKING APPLIANCE 0 C-INTERCEPT-INDUST 0 C-DEEP FRYER 0 C-LAWN SPRINKLER 0 C-DUCT CHANGE 0 C-PLUMBING EQUIPMENT 0 C-ELEC FURN/HEAT PMP 0 C-ROOF DRAIN 0 C-EVAP.COOLERS 0 C-SHAMPOO SINK 0 C-FAN 0 C-SINK 0 C-FIREPLACE,lel E,GAS 0 C-SUMP PUMP 0 C-FIREPLACE,WOOD 0 C-TUB/SHOWER 0 C-FURNACE<100K BTU 0 C-VACUUM BKR(1-5) 0 C-FURNACE>100K BTU • 0 C-VACUUM BKR>5 0 C-GASPIPE SYSTEM 0 C-WATER CLOSET I 0 C-GRIDDLE0 C-WATER HEATER 0 C-LP TANK'' 0 C-WATER PIPE CHANGE 0 C-MECH EQUIP 1 R-BUILDING SEWER 0 C-PIZZA OVEN f I R-CLOTHES WASHER 0 C-RANGE TOP 1 R-DISH WASHER 0 C-ROTISSERIE OVEN I R-HOSE BIB 0 C-UNIT HEAT 3 R-SINK 0 C-WATER HEATER GAS I R-TUB/SHOWER 0 C-WOK h 1 R-WATER CLOSET 0 C-WOOD CHARBROILER I R-WATER HEATER 1 R-CLOTHES DRYER 1 R-COOK STOVE 2 R-FAN 1 R-FURNACE-NATURAL 2 R-GASPIPE SYSTEM Printed by:Wolf,Valarieon:10/09/2014 08:27 AM Page 5 of 5 1 • Field Report aCift EnviroSound Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Consulting l • Project Name: The Ridge at East Park Job Number: ESC13-G014 Client: Highmark Homes LLC Date: 2-13-15 Weather: Sunny Report Number: 81 Purpose of Visit: Observe Lot 50 Permit Number: Reviewed By: Shawn E. Williams,LG/LEG If Arrived on site at 1200. A representative of EnviroSound Consultants (EnviroSound) arrived on site as requested to observe Lot 50. Construction was nearly complete on Lot 50 with the structure in place and landscaping being finalized. It is our opinion that no further geotechnical inspections are necessary on Lot 50. Departed site shortly after 1230. END OF REPORT li IIt. EnviroSound Consulting • 3388 Byron Street Ste 200 • Silverdale, WA 98383 360.698.5950 Fax 360.698.5929 BUILDING PERMIT 2231 SCHLEY WAY LT 50 INSPECTION CARD NEW SFR W/3 STALL GARAGE PROTECT THIS CARD FROM THE WEATHER I r r OF xv, BREMERTON Building Plumbing Mechanical IEF Alarm/Sprinkler LI This Placard must be posted on or near building and the Permit&"Approved" plans must be at the site. Permit # BB 14 00156 PO - SITE Call the following Agency Telephone Numbers for inspections: -Property lines shall be properly identified and marked before foundation footing inspection.Setbacks are measured to the ' Building Department Inspections: (360)473-5870 finished wall structure. Water-Public Works: (360)473-5927 -Reinspection fee may be assessed if inspection has been PW-Public Works-Engineering: (360)473-5270 requested when not ready or corrections are not completed.. Kitsap Public Health: (360)337-5235 -Permit,approved plans,engineering,and inspection card shall Fire-Fire Department: (360)473-5386 be on site during construction or Reinspection Fee may be L&I-Dept.of Labor and Industry: (360)415-4000 assessed. Inspection" APP, �� DATE Notes Geotechnical inspection for grading and fill.Send report to Bldg Dept. Geotechnical Report for Structural Fill and Compaction, Soil Bearing.Send report to Bldg Dept. Foundation Footings,Property lines shall be properly I- identified L, ( '3-'4 Foundation Walls/Hold downs Geotechnical Engineer Final Letter,Send report to Bldg Dept Plumbing Groundwork Th. (1/4) Underfloor Framing Inspection/Anchor Bolts& i rpt Washers/Hold Downs �'�, Shear Wall Panels/Braced Wall Panels 04* 1--1-1;-- Srralf 5 dria, e_ t2ld p,.n alA CJ-Selga Mechanical Rough-In ( ( - -t Plumbing Rough-In _ 1-2.-t 5 Gas Piping Pressure Test /,., — L&I-Electrical Cover Inspection Before Framing(State of Washington) 4.11 0, t 5 Framing Inspection(Mechanical&Plumb Rough-In, Elect Cover Completed) `r 7 /5 Insulation-Wall l-7-1�J Sheetrock Nailing ° ( (- Paved Driveway&parking areas M a- { 3-I$. Insulation-Ceiling NIA a-15 r 5� Insulation-Underfloor ' ._�- y" FINAL BUILDING (360)473-5870 All of the above must be approved. Approved Final Inspection grants occupancy for single-family residence only. Commercial structures require separate Certificate of Occupancy. DO NOT OCCUPY BUILDING WITHOUT BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Page I of2 BUILDING PERMIT 2231 SCHLEY WAY LT 50 INSPECTION CARD NEW SFR W/3 STALL GARAGE CITY OF PROTECT THIS CARD FROM THE WEATHER BREMERTON Inspection- = APP DATE < a Notes v Energy Code-Duct Testing-Provide signed affidavit to Bldg Dept N ' Energy Code-Air Leakage Test(Blower Door Test) mkt 2-10-1 1-1,3 L&1-Electrical Final Inspection u !Z- - t5 PW-Sewer Lateral PW-Final Inspection-Utilities 74A.c PW-Driveway approach final PW-Right-of-Way Other Insulation-Slab A-2-get15 FIRE-Final Inspection Jr 1.1-12.0) PW-Final Inspection-Public Works T ci 'Z WATER-Potable Water Backflow Prevention(domestic, n C fire sprinklers, irrigation) v�• Final Inspection-Building FINAL BUILDING (360)473-5870 All of the above must be approved.Approved Final Inspection grants occupancy for single-family residence only. Commercial structures require separate Certificate of Occupancy. DO NOT OCCUPY BUILDING WITHOUT BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Page 2 of 2 Print Parcel Search Map Page 1 of 1 Kitsap County Parcel Search � �� , Legend. Parcels Read Names. • xis t. 5559-000-078-0001 Copyright©2011 Kitsap County. DISCLAIMER: This map is intended for display purposes only and is not intended for any legal representations. [Click here to Prints http://kcwppub3.co.kitsap.wa.us/ParcelSearch/PRINT.ASP?CM... 9/16/2014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION CITY OF 345 — 6th Street, Suite 600 BREMERTON Bremerton, Washington (360) 473-5275 INSPECTION REPORT PERMIT #: 1-31 ` t>v I ADDRESS: 2-25 54.e.,667 (1) id-vi4o,,;( r cc_�. 5 ire 4-�5 cry ( c. e 119 (2--4 4-6-6r---ca_eii 10-0-Ibit S4V -‘')./tietzre4,--1 3 4`-3 wux - bee— , ref Lc-e-ok- Cv i4A'l -51/i* • "(17/1-04--- - �u mak. 1 ee,t- „ . G") 1)-"Aot et.5t /1 ( 4?e-eGe 1,1\ y-,0 Date: 1 2 Phond1-7?-C 2'� I/I , .1 S ' -1 TOR `'�----- )2sf' 1 C , 0 11 o 40'' / i ' ' 1/4t,.. N 10 il IX / / - '..v.„ __ ./ e, 1,-) .4 4/1 ' A Uf . ,� c‘. ,/ o / 49.7,,,. ,.... , ' :,-dip —0 ". : ill) O ''', "0-1:!:-i i " - -4:: „- ,..).1., if-, 44 , r.. , 'vy e NC :a#,I iv Iv ' G92\ DRI A- :S !ibijii!! ♦, EAST FAF K 1 r• `LOT IS, EAST PARK SETBACKS ,�„O T 50 Front: S' 2231 5C1-4LEY UJ,41' Side: `---- Rear: !BiEME TON UJA The setback is measured from PARCEL *5555-000-O7S-0001 the propertyline to the finishe eXerior wall. (�d �l O ACS C A L C. SCOL E 1 : 2 0 LOT AREA. 052 SF PROPOSED STRUCTURE= 988SF LOT COVERAGE= 59.8% 1 ;; 2 ad MAR 2 6 2014 -' City of Bremerton, DCD .„, Lo/ 7,1 Dora � rWMT : CENTER CPS/ li•''- "A RESIDENTIAL cern _oi �® -` BREMERTC�t�", \Apo �6 8uiidi'rg Permit Application Q ... Dc >artnuv>t oCConu unity Develo iii>c _' fi • 100.1)01 SUret,Suite 600 ' 13rcn>c'rtou " WA ' !18337-1873 ( (1) 17 $m ax (3fi(1) I7 .)2(8 cnctc.ci.l>rcn>crtou.cv:c.us Applicant:. 1-1"'';r0 ri Contractor j„.._, 4)0 Authorized Agent Site Address: 2231 Schley Way Lo 1 50 To apply for a properly address,contact Public Works at(360)473-5270 . CONTRACTOR:Highmark Homes �� OWNER: _ „_ Address16400 Southcenter Pkwy #21 i`ddress: City, State, Zi , WA 981 88 ukca laCit- , State, Zi.): License# 8, Exp. DatetlIGHMHL 9 0 4R7 1 2-27- .' one#: ( ) Contact Name: Thomas Toll en — 1-4 Authorized Agent Name: Mike Goral Contact Phone #: (253 ) 89.1 -4388 Address: 26506 163rd Ave.. SE.- , . .. _ . Email addrklcmast@windermere. c_om_ City, State, Zip_l Covington, WA 98042 Tax ID/Parcel#: 5559-000-078-0001 Phone#: (253 ) 255-5532 _________________ M Lx Sevier Li Septic l[Email addres michaelgoral@msn.com 'What is the application for (Please check) ___�r 1 New Construction E}Alteration L Additiord (_x1 NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE L i RESIDENTIAL REBUILD L_-.J NEW DUPLEX LA RESIDENTIAL/.DDITION I::j NEW MANUFACTURED HOME Li RESIDENTIAL REPAIR LA NEW GARAGE/CARPORT [_i NEW ACCESSORY BUILDING f.__. )6,,101.1("ION __. _..sf Intelinr f Exterior` .__ ___.sf Foundation Wali'` _ _ of Rcof/Section"" _- _J Separate demolition permit and fees required. Contact Public Works for sewer cap permit(473-5270). Sewer must be capped prior to demolition permit issuance. , , I.---1 OTHER: IS THIS PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SHORELINE? • YES[1 NO)X.J Scope of work proposed: New SFR Square Footage: Building: 1st Floor 85 Basement Garage: 1stFicor240 at)-84- a q-•3 2nd Floor 9 48 other 4 0�_....-----""",�"".7,��"2nd"Ftber � -tired Deck(s)''._... 49_ ': o, /i A 0/) Valuation Plan Review Fee porch ' tea, ' e 1 _I r ,.�f����C le__ --Surcharge__ To :1 ee o A �c 45'o ÷0 IP 7 qo _ . Application tor which no permit is issued within 180 days following the elate of appticatton shall expire by limitation,and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days on request by the applicant,showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. No applicant shall be extended more than once. In order to renew action on an '9 application after expiration,the applicant snail resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee. Applicant's Signature (Print) Date • Rev.Oct 2008 (Continued on back) RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Site Address: 2231 Schley Way 2. Are any areas being developed on the site within 200 feet of the shoreline? Yes No NOTE: If yes,please fill out a Shoreline Permit Submittal Checklist(WAC 173-27-180) CRITICAL AREA CHECKLIST: • 3. Slope is calculated by dividing the vertical Check all that apply to the site and areas within 200 feet of the distance by the horizontal distance and then site. multiplying the result by 100. Example: Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling:slopes on site generally :r ::a ° % Distance="20' VHilly: slopes present on site of and less than 30%. Horizontal v Steep: grades of greater than 30%present on site. • Distance = 100' Vertical 20 feet Other(please describe): Horizontal 100 feet=.2 X 100=20%slope 4. Does the site or properties within 200 feet of the site contain areas of standing water, creek or an area where water flows across the ground surface? Yes N 5. Is there an apparent wetland present on the site or on properties within 200 feet of the site'? Yes RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEET: 6. What is the amount of grading proposed(in cubic yards), not including foundation area? • Fill amount__ � Cut amount Total grading j., f5 •ritn4 fro-y NOTE: Grading over 50 cubic yards requires a separate permit. Will the grading material be imported or exported? Yes/No 7. Please provide the following information. The setbacks are measured from the finished exterior wall of a structure to the lot line, not from the foundation. Accurately represent your setbacks on site plan. ++' DESC.RIPTION ' PROPOSED 1 ront ' ard'setback tb �: �'_.._ Use this as the second front yard setback Rear yard setback y1 for corner lots and through lots. -- Side yard setback I Side):_ rd setback y' • Development Coverage is defined as Maximum her;ht that portion of a lot covered by impervious I Development coverage' _ surface areas of all structures, and Number of off-street impervious paved areas, such as parkin slrtces Z ^-- driveways and walkways. Residential Questionnaire Revision: October 2008 . get 0 A I ISCEZIV ea tf.0-MilWat• . ---, F MAR 2 6 2014 PERMIT CENTER _..... .., . .,, Dept. of Community.Development*345 -6th Street. Suite 600*Bremerton*\\PA*W3337-11173 .... T Of remerton, DCD 0 Mechanical jiN s Plumbin,, - — — 11 _ r..._ 1 Type of Fuel: 'Electric 'Gas Li Oil CI Propane Occupancy: 95 Residential Li Commercial Site Address 2231 Schley Way --- , I CONTRACTOR: Ppltram Plumbing i OWNER: Highmark Homes _ — ------------ - _______ Address: 1929 W. -Valley Hwy. S. [ Address: 16400 SOuthcenter Pkwy#210 t----. _ _ !-- — City, State, Zip: AtIbtlill, WA 9800LCV State Zip: Tukwila WA.98188 rficeilse-71:PELTRP1075DZ ! Phone F(25i)891-4388 --- ' -- - --------- I Contact Phone#: (-253)891-8781 I Tax ID/Parcel -II: 5559-000-078-0001 ----------- ir : - ! ! No. 1 -61;1'ffoffiOtTI13ilCiffNt------1- 67-1------WfitefoVill, ipki7,------ 1 i-- -_i AIRTIANDLING UNIT>10,000CFM 1 ATMOSPHERIC VACUUM BRKR 1-5 r"---- 1 AIR HANDLING UNIT<10,000 CFM -------1--------- ATMOSPHERIC VACUUM BRKR>5_ 1 1 BATH FAN AND/OR EXHAUST FAN BAC ----- KI7EOW DEVICE<=2" , CLASS I HOOD&DUCT SYSTEM I 1 BACKFLOW DEVICE>2" _ ----1 --T -----7--77,--7-7--- , — CLASS 2 HOOD&DUCT SYSTEM 1 . i j_BUILDING SEWEI. V 471. CLOTHES WASHERt, i 1 COMMERCIAL FURNACE/DUCT_ I COMMERCIAL FLOOR DRAIN , 1 C-(YMNI. IITRWAC-F;i7)-6RIOTTI t-IS' I : _i 1---51-§0,-,A§Tick-- --7- • _ ___ _ _ I — -R-OMPR ESSOTZK- 1 i DRAIN PIPE/VENT PIPE ALTERATION _ —,_ I I COOK STOVE \V/EXHAUST . I 1 DRINKING FOUNTAIN I - (-DUCT CHAOE W/O NEW FURNACE 1 I FLOOR DRAIN --- I ELECTRIC FURNACE/HEAT PUMP --I — ---1 FLOOR SINK/INDIRECT WASTE__ --- , ! EVAPORATIVE COOLER 4 f , j GREASE INTERCEPTOR __ , I 1 FIREPLACE4GAS OR GAS LOI GINSERT __ - F I / HOSE BIBBS v 1 i FIREPLACE-M)05, 612Wo-C7DS-TOVE — 1 ,— ' I INDUSTRIAL SAND/01-CINTERCEPTOR— __+______/___ -:--;-_-77:-: I GAS WATER HEATER St\TENT ------ : I_LAWN SPRINKLER W/13ACKPLOW-IiiiV. 1 GAS!-- PIPIN61 1 ROOF DRAIN-----1-WSCF-1 LANI6US NTECHANICALSHAMPOO SINK W/BACKFLOVTDEVICe---- NATUTZAL GAS FURNACE/DUCTINCi _ _L_ 3 i SINK-(LAV. KITCHEN, MOP OR BAR) P' i PR6TANE F(1kNACEIDUCIING _ 1 1 st5,TPTUkip : i 1 PROPANE TANK (<2000 GALLONS) - i / I TUB AND/OR SHOWER UNIT UNIT HEATER . / r-WATER CTOSET AND/OR URINAL i." ! 1 al-11ER: 1 , I OTHER , _ L _ ra ITIER: _ . _ _ ---------------- , i ---------- i 1 NIECHANICAL F*ES: I• ' ' -----i- L _PILIWBING FEES: L L..._ ______TiOTAL FEES: 1 -____Li _________ 7'...z_._ 1 i,...40,..0.-e. 721/.-/ L1 _ - Applicant's Signature Date • • ,, i *,,,i,,.:,2; & ' ! h i ' e ., ....,..!. ,: , PERMIT T CENTER MAR 2 6 2014 ., Dot. of Community Development*345 — 6th Street, Suite 600*Bremerton*WA '981mty S7�remerton, DCD pit Mechanical ❑ Plumbing Type of Fuel: ❑Electric X Gas ❑Oil 0 Propane Occupancy: V Residential El Commercial Site Address: 2231 Schley Way__ CONTRACTOR: Indoor Comfort Systems, Inc. OWNER: Highmark Homes Address: 118 Violet Meadows St. S. Address: 16400 Southcenter Pkwy. #210 City, State, Zip: Tacoma, WA 98444 City, State, Zip: Tukwila, WA 98188 License #: INDOOCS 132OH Phone # (253)255-5532 Contact Phone#: (253)539-1424 Tax ID/Parcel #: 5559-000-078-0001 NO. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT ' NO. TYPE OF FIXTURE AIR HANDLING UNIT>10,000CFM ATMOSPHERIC VACUUM BRKR 1-5 AIR HANDLING UNIT<10,000 CFM ATMOSPHERIC VACUUM BRKR>5 A BATH FAN AND/OR EXHAUST FAN V BACKFLOW DEVICE<=2" CLASS 1 HOOD&DUCT SYSTEM BACKFLOW DEVICE>2" CLASS 2 HOOD&DUCT SYSTEM BUILDING SEWER 1 CLOTHES DRYER W/EXHAUST `' _ CLOTHES WASHER COMMERCIAL FURNACE/DUCT COMMERCIAL FLOOR DRAIN COMM. FURNACE>100,000 BTUS DISHWASHER COMPRESSORS DRAIN PIPE/VENT PIPE ALTERATION 1 COOK STOVE W/EXHAUST V DRINKING FOUNTAIN DUCT CHANGE W/O NEW FURNACE FLOOR DRAIN ELECTRIC FURNACE/HEAT PUMP FLOOR SINK/INDIRECT WASTE EVAPORATIVE COOLER GREASE INTERCEPTOR FIREPLACE-GAS OR GAS LOG INSERT HOSE BIBBS FIREPLACE-WOOD,OR WOODSTOVE INDUSTRIAL SAND/OIL INTERCEPTOR _ 1 GAS WATER HEATER&VENT ✓ LAWN SPRINKLER W/BACKFLOW DEV. 1 GAS PIPING ROOF DRAIN MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL SHAMPOO SINK W/BACKFLOW DEVICE 1 NATURAL GAS FURNACE/DUCTING / SINK(LAV,KITCHEN, MOP OR BAR) PROPANE FURNACE/DUCTING SUMP PUMP PROPANE TANK (<2000 GALLONS) TUB AND/OR SHOWER UNIT UNIT HEATER WATER CLOSET AND/OR URINAL OTHER: OTHER OTHER: OTHER: MECHANICAL FEES: PLUMBING FEES: TOTAL FEES: Applicant's Signature Date • Simple Heating System Size: Washington State • ' This heating system sizing calculator is based on the Prescriptive Requirements of the 2012 Washington State Energy Code(WSEC)and ACCA , Manuals J and S.This calculator will calculate heating loads only.ACCA procedures for sizing cooling systems should be used to determine cooling loads. The glazing(window)and door portion of this calculator assumes the installed glazing and door products have an area weighted average U-factor of 0.30. The incorporated insulation requirements are the minimum prescriptive amounts specified by the 2012 WSEC. Please fill out all of the green drop-downs and boxes that are applicable to your project.As you make selections in the drop-downs for each section, some values will be calculated for you.If you do not see the Selection you.need in the drop-down options,please call the WSU Energy Extension Program at(360)956-2042 for assistance. , . • • Project Information. „ Contact Information G'1033"• .. .n. s Heating System Type: Forced Air Furnace 0 Heat Pump • To see detailed instructions for each section,place your cursor on the word"Instructions". Design Temperature • Instructions Design Temperature Difference(AT) • 41 Bremerton w AT=Indoor(70 degrees)-Outdoor Design Temp Area of Build • ding Conditioned Floor Area Instructions. Conditioned Floor Area(sq ft) 1 033, Average.Ceiling Height Conditioned Volume . M? • Instructions Average Ceiling Height(ft) � •, 9i0 - 9,297 . . n Glazing and Doors U-Factor X Area UA ' Instructions 0.30 48.. ••;n, 14.40 O Insulation • CO 7 Attic U-Factor X Area = UA ry . Nom.,,... Instructions t 25:69 CD O7 R-49 • 0.026 ,988 .Single Rafter or Joist Vaulted Ceilings U-Factor Area UA Instructions `" Select R Value I No selection • Above Grade Walls(see Figure 1) U-Factor Area • UA Instructions " 9 =sem 0.0564741r595„,..„."i 84.28 I ,44,1 R-21 .b.., "-•^,w. ter.., ,.„-.,,�. u • Floorsruction-' cto Area • 'UA • • U-Far instS R so .:., 0.029 X788,',"',, 22.85 Below Grade Walls(see Figure 1) U-Factor Area UA instructions -! No selection Select R value Slab Below Grade(see Figure f) F-Factor Length • ' UA Instructions• Select conditionin • ?-' • No selection Slab on Grade(see Figure F-Factor Length UA • Instructions wr «; : , 0.540 52«.. -28 08 L R-10 Perimeter Location of Ducts s instruction .. _ Duct Leakage Coefficient Unconditioned Space V 1.10 Sum of UA 175.30 Envelope Heat Load 7,187 Btu/Hour Figure 1. Sum ofUAXAr Air Leakage Heat Load „ 4,117 Btu/Hour VolumeX 0.6XATX.018 Above Grade% Building Design Heat Load ' . 11,304 Btu/Hour K� .. Air Leakage*Envelope Heat Loss Building and Duct Heat Load • 12,434 Btu/Hour " Ducts in unconditioned space:Sum of Building Heat Loss X 1.10 . • Ducts in conditioned space:Sum of Building Heat Loss X 1 Maximum Heat Equipment Output 17,408. Btu/.Hour Building and Duct Heat Loss X 1.40 for Forced Air Furnace • Building and Duct Heat Loss X1 25 for Heat Pump (07/01/13) Prescriptive Energy Code Compliance for.Climate Zones 6, 5 and Marine 4 Project Information • Contact Information G1033 4 , $ ,"'W" ft14> g1? .1� y ___..iii., ,uk-i,a ..,.�., =� ,., .. X t**'''' ""�' :aw..:?•.,. This project will use the requirements of the Prescriptive Path below and incorporate the the minimum values listed. In addition, based on the size of the structure,the appropriate number of additional credits are checked as chosen by thepermit applicant. Authorized Representative Date Climate Zone 5 & Marine 4 6 R-Values U-Factora R-Values U-Factora Fenestration U-Factorb n/a 0.30 n/a 0.30 Skylight U-Factor. n/a 0.50 n/a 0.50 Glazed Fenestration SHGC e • n/a n/a n/a n/a Ceiling 49) 0.026 49 0.026 Wood Frame Wall9'k'l 21 int 0.056 21+5ci 0.044 Mass Wall R-Value' 21/21h ' 0.056 21+5h. . 0.044 Floor309 0.029 309 . . 0.029 Below Grade Wallc,k 10/15/21 int+TB 0.042 10/15/21.int+TB 0.042 Slabd R-Value& Depth 10, 2 ft n/a 10,4 ft ._ n/a *Table R402.1.1 and Table R402.1.3 Footnotes included on Page 2. Each dwelling unit in one and two-family dwellings and townhouses,as defined in Section 101.2 of.the International Residential Code shall comply with sufficient options from Table R406.2 so as to achieve the following minimum number of credits: D. Small Dwelling Unit: 0.5 points Dwelling units less than 1500 square feet in conditioned floor area with less than 300 square feet of fenestration area. Additions to existing building that are less than 750 square feet of heated floor area. ❑2. Medium Dwelling Unit: 1.5 points All dwelling unitsthat are not included in#1 or#3, including additions over 750 square feet. ❑3. Large Dwelling Unit: 2.5 points Dwelling units exceeding 5000 square feet of conditioned floor area. Table R406.2 Summary Option Description; Credit(s) 1a Efficient Building Envelope la 0.5 ❑ . 1 b Efficient Building Envelope 1 b 1.0 ❑ 1c Efficient Building Envelope lc 2.0 ❑ 2a Air Leakage Control and Efficient Ventilation 2a 0.5 El 0.5 2b Air Leakage Control and Efficient Ventilation 2b 1,0 ❑ 2c Air Leakage Control and Efficient Ventilation 2c • 1.5 ❑ 3a High Efficiency HVAC 3a 0.5 2 0.5 3b High Efficiency HVAC 3b 1.0 ❑ 3c High Efficiency HVAC 3c - 2.0 ❑ 3d High Efficiency HVAC 3d 1.0 ❑ 4 High Efficiency HVAC Distribution System 1.0 ' . .❑ 5a . Efficient Water Heating 0.5 2 ' ' 0.5 5b Efficient Water Heating 1.5 ❑ 6 Renewable Electric Energy 0.5 *.1200 kwh 0.0 Total Credits 11 1.50 *Please refer to Table R406.2 for complete option descriptions http://www.energy.wsu.edu/Documents/2012%20Res%20Energy.pdf Table R402.1.1 Footnotes For SI: 1 foot 304.8 mm, ci =continuous insulation, int intermediate framing: a R-values are minimums.U.-factors and SHGC are maximums. When insulation is installed in a cavity which is less than the label or design thickness of the insulation, the compressed R-value of the insulation from Appendix Table A101.4 shall not be less than the R-value specified in the table: b The fenestration U;-factor column excludes skylights.The SHGC column applies to all glazed fenestration. Exception:Skylightsi'may be excluded from glazed fenestration SHGC requirements in Climate Zones 1 through 3 where the SHGC for such skylights does not exceed 0.30. "10/15/21.+TB" means R-10 continuous insulation on the exterior of the wall, or.R-15 on the continuous insulation on the interior of the wall, or R-21 cavity insulation plus a thermal break between the slab and the basement wall at the interior of the basement wall. "10/15/21.+TB"shall be permitted to be met with R-13 cavity insulation on the interior of the basement wall plus R-5 continuous insulation on the interior or exterior of the wall.';'10/13" means R-10 continuous insulation onthe interior or exterior of the home or R- 13 cavity insulation at the interior of the basement wall. "TB" means thermal break between floor slab and basement wall. d R-10 continuous insulation is required under heated slab on grade floors.See R402.2.9.1. e There are no SHGC requirements in the Marine Zone. f Basement wall insulation is not required in warm-humid locations as defined by Figure R301.1 and Table R301.1. g Reserved. h First value is cavity insulation, second is continuous insulation or insulated siding,so "13.+5" means R-13 cavity insulation plus R-5 continuous insulation or insulated siding. If structural sheathing covers 40 percent or less of the exterior, continuous insulation R-value shall be permitted to be reduced by no more than R-3 in the locations wheref structural sheathing is used to maintain a consistent total.sheathing thickness. The second R-value applies when more than half the insulation is on the interior of the mass wall. For single rafter-or joist-vaulted ceilings,the insulation may be reduced to R-38. k Int. (intermediate framing) denotes standard framing 16 inches on center with headers insulated with a minimum of R-10 insulation. Log and solid timber walls with a minimum average thickness of 3.5 inches are exempt from this insulation requirement. Table R402.1.3 Footnote a Nonfenestration.U-factors shall be obtained from measurement, calculation or an approved source or as specified in Section R402.1.3. Glazing Schedule • Project Information .. Contact Information. G-1033 : •_ •. ., , . . . .• -• . „ . ., . . . .. .., . . . .. . • • . , . . . .. • . , ....• .. . . . . . . . . .. . . • • • . . . . . .. .. • . ... • . ... ..... . . . . ..• . .., .•.. . • ... . . . . . , . • . . . „ . , .• • . . • ..• R402.3.3 Exception (15 sq. ft Max.) • 15 Vertical Glazing (Windows and glazed doors) . • Plan . Component . -• • ' Glazing • Width Height , - . Glazing • ID - . . Description - ' - Ref. U-factor - Qt. Feet Inch Feet Inch Area UA ENTRY ,0.3Q ' ••1! 2 4 8.0 2.40 ,.,gu STAIRS 0 30 I , 4..'`; 5 20.0 6.00 • .,.;:KITCHEN 030, 1`1; . •3••••;,i:.4 4 12.0 3.60 . Mit" 2 010 1` 4 `:5 •20.0 6.00 ,r 'BEDROOM 1 - . 0130 1„ 8 ' 5 40.0 . 12.00 ,,,, ':GREAT ROOM .mM 0!3,0 ::0 1 8 5 - 40:0 • 12.00 DINING ROOM - 0 30' 1 4. 5 20.0 . 6.00 ;' 03,0 :; • 0.0 . 0.00 � 0 3 ':aiii-a .. 0.0 0.00 ' • 'K ''. :,' _:` mak?': , 0 3o r,T. • �o:o o.00 _ .. 030 .•-o . ' 0.0 0.00 ,. ;. 0 30 Z., 0.0 . 0.00 o3a 0.0 0.00 e• 'sem i.i,; «;_ • i2 _ ;i .01',.U..;-,.24 • - 0.0 0.00 . gyi; 0 30<�,. o.o o.00 . x' 030 .. i o.o 0.00 • - i 0130, E, - o.o "o.00 - i,, 030 k • o.o o.00 '"':-:""'"9-"': .0 30 . 0.0 0.00 % U. 0.0 -0.00 k , f .,_ .li. , ... ill!,..2-21:-030:-.0:23-ti , • 0.0 0.00 ,. .,.Zx;o-..Y. .?,.,, , .�•;.,, aril w •; 0.0 0.00 1, .., . sr :F I,, j i i. . i . .... 0.0 0.00 Foolotit t " 1, 0 oma <; : > �: . N 0.0 0.00 1. ,. .,, tea.. .. „ , - 0.0 • 0.00 7 .. . „e x„„ ' - ki.. 0.0 0.00 l :: b a ; , 0.0 0.00 i +' Sitiliy • ° • • 0.0 0.00 .'; .. _':; ..,..,R%f '/Lne , F,,, ,e.. K .. •.?,;, F" k,. ,i%s' ,.._ Nuys ,. ,s.,.,. J ..".'^. � �� � 0.00 ` 0.0 i it 4 x .,��. ; r��• jp cz:> 0.0 0.00 . 5D,'. ?,; .. '. a=,=R+ate_„ ,, ;;; ,'" xw1 ➢ ',;." $,, '-11.,: 0.0 0.00 am ,' ,, M. 0.0 0.00 qR5 ix2•*, °zrr .«.H, ,aw+k',fi f CRR 00 ^fit ri;i ea'n' .0000n: . s=,; 4 0.0 • 0.00 . . , , ; . l : i ..,r_ 0.0 0.00 . ;gt rx „1.20,-,.;,,, : .... ,, .. 0.0 0.00 "e aa ,, � , n, ,,,ti. �� R , • 0 0 0.00 • • • I: .�„�` ,;�' 4, =.a�qa,'���� ... :: .. r�roaa'...�. ...., . ...', ..«,..,. ,- ..., � �,. .'.,- *; ., � •- 0.0 0.00 • . . Sum of Area.and UA - , 160.0 48.00 Area Weighted U •=..UA/Area• • •. 0.30 .. pally ::,;,::: H. . . i',. ,„ ' . Permit Center MAR 2 6 2014 •-.. Dept. of Community Development k ; : ,z,',,,< F 345 - 6th Street, Suite 600*Bremerton*INA'�98337-�f Bremerton, DCD WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION USING THE PRESCRIPTIVE METHOD IN 2009 IRC Purpose: We have all heard about office and school buildings which cause people to become ill. If improperly ventilated,our homes can cause some of us to become ill too. With all of the new materials we use to construct and furnish our buildings, it is very important that our homes are ventilated in such a way as to provide us with a method to get the stale air out and fresh air in. Please check the appropriate box to describe which of the four prescriptive Whole House Ventilation Systems you will be using,and fill in any blanks or boxes under the system you choose. 1 Option 1// Whole house Ventilation Using Exhaust Fans(IRC Section M1508))24 • (Do CFM Exhaust Fan Flow Rating Per Table M1508.2(attached). Location of whole house exhaust fan(s)must be shown on the plans, • Fan Controls:24 hour clock timer with capability of continuous operation,manual and automatic control&accessible • Whole house fans located 4 feet or less from the interior grille shall have a sone rating of 1.5 or less at 0.1 inches w.g. • Outdoor Air shall be distributed to each habitable room by individual Outdoor Air inlets. Exception:Exhaust only ventilation systems do not require outdoor air inlets if the home has a ducted forced air heating system that communicates with all habitable rooms and the interior doors are undercut a minimum of%inch. EllOption 2. Whole house Ventilation Integrated with a Forced Air Heating System(IRC Section M1508.5.1) • inch Fresh air duct,connected to the furnace return plenum,sized Per Table M1508.6.2.(attached) • Fresh Air inlet duct Damper Selection:(Choose one) ❑ Motorized Damper(no testing of ventilation flow rates as long as the prescriptive duct sizing per Table M1508.6.2.are met. ❑ Manual Damper meeting Table 3-2 flow rates: CFM(see attached Table M1508.6.2.) Automatic Flow-Regulated Device(Requires field testing or calculation.) • Outdoor Air inlets shall be screened or otherwise protected from entry by leaves or other material and located • All Ventilation supply ducts in the conditioned space shall be insulated to a minimum of R-4 0 Option 3. Whole house Ventilation Using a Supply Fan(IRC Section M1508) . • inch Outdoor air inlet duct,connected to the furnace supply air stream,sized Per Table M1508.6,2.(attached) • Fresh Air inlet duct Back-draft Damper Selection:(Choose one) 0 Calibrated manual volume damper installed and set to meet the measured flow rates in Table 3-2(attached)by field testing with a pressure gauge and/or following manufacturer's installation instructions. EjA manual volume damper installed and set to meet the measured flow rates specified In Table M1508.6.2.by field testing with a flow hood or flow measuring station. ElAn automatic flow-regulating device sized to the specified flow rate in Table Mt 508.6.2.which provides constant flow over a pressure range of 0.20 to 0.60 inches water gauge. • Outdoor Air inlets shall be screened or otherwise protected from entry by leaves or other material and located • All Ventilation supply ducts in the conditioned space shall be insulated to a minimum of R-4 El Option 4. Whole house Ventilation Using a Heat Recovery Ventilation System . • All duct work in heat recovery system shall be at least 6 inches in diameter • Balancing dampers shall be installed on the inlet and exhaust side. . • Flow measurement grids shall be installed on the supply and return. • System minimum flow rating shall not be less than specified in Table M1508.6.2. • • Outdoor air inlets shall be screened or otherwise protected from entry by leaves or other material and located . • Ventilation Supply Ducts in the conditioned space upstream of the heat exchanger shall be insulated to a minimum of R-4 • e'a THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO THE OPTION CHOSEN: • At the time of final inspection,the automatic control time shall be set to operate the whole house fan for at least 8 hours per day, • A label shall be affixed to the control that reads"Whole House Ventilation"(see operating instructions) • 24-hour clock timer installed with capability of continuous operation,manual and automatic control,readily accessible. • Installer shall provide the manufacturer's installation,operating instructions,and a whole house ventilation system operation description. REFERENCE TABLES Table M1508.2 Whole House Ventilation • Minimum Ventilation Rates: (Continuously Operated Systems)(cfm) Floor Area(ft2) Number of Bedrooms 0-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 >7 <1500 30 45 60 75 90 1501 -3000 45 60 75 90 105 3001 -4500 60 75 90 105 120 4501 -6000 75 90 105 120 135 6001 -7500 90 105 120 135 150 >7500 105 120 135 150 165 Table M1508.6.2: Prescriptive Supply Fan Duct Sizing Supply Fan Tested CFM at 0.40"w.g. Specified Minimum Smooth Minimum Flexible Volume from Duct Diameter Duct Diameter Table 408.1 50-90 cfm 4 inch 5 inch 90-150 cfm 5 inch 6 inch 150-250 cfm 6 inch 7 inch 250-400 cfm 7 inch 8 inch PRESCRIPTIVE HEATING SYSTEM SIZING All heating equipment must be sized using a recognized engineering practice.Typical sources include: •ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals. •ACCA Manual J,8m Edition-Residential Load Calculation. •ACCA Manual N-Commercial Load Calculation. WSEC:www.eneray.wsu.edu/code ,r #' r �(/� . ::• Ba a,.'>;,4 'f i, Tr;fit F' ' • r, y + k :!p,S4ts.f�>;iytl ' ".#'-.,'g�. �.: . ':? _:fir., • • T ' 4'.pWc- ♦ .A K.‘‘.:'''.,`::;;;11?:';',.: ' ,p06 00047f _ . Ie. „1' i.'� lr),{,' •• Solufion.s .. - , . , • HAR 2., 2006I? 2©°fig V D • .: • i., f.fn t rvdr, st r,,;.„.ii...:... .. : • . ... . , . BRE ERT , e,, { wt -� 'oMMUNyppv-ntpTof NT t 1•.v• 711'4' 1 [xlt51�r,t .r„+r 1+i ''r '. 1 ft,it f;:•1r -- .•f i , -i _.4,,P: .. p• 1'i 'i•''.;;`` • 1 • " x { ,. r , • [ 11 ./ I1�t ft.I xI :l cv5 i •rl'� f•' M4• • 1.154 -I:..1117,,,-.1: 4. 1 r • . • 1 •s�I> ••Y t+ t f • • • • , ._.. ..a •r'/ f'Ya ( 'F'7� S •1 r • {r . ,'. Y, If• • 1G9:y�.,t,J�`t„- ti - i t 'i '114 1 j f, '' rM1 ; -''.1'...:.•40-'' 3 •••••--4 •'•-..,,•1-•') co t r 4.T. . -;,,, ' _.,, ,,411 V ' ' 7 R , c E `. },' k' } xt 1 I „.,...........p. ia ' +rti t+� r rl frMAR 262014 J 1L . yk +d.. .r 1 -1 • • City of Bremerton, DCS t r •; 1Y ypp 1'(� :7� LiJ/ 5 - t t'AT1;�b .1.T.,;:•,:' S r.F I ° jt, 2603 - 151ST Ci' l.•, { ` i ' • J', PLACE N.E., Rr-on+conra, VVASKINGT � _ i � ; ., ,,; •• , 425.284.3300 FAx 425.284.28 + N L r - Si F IT r ii .r ' Toa FREE 866.336.8710 '� 1 • �• �tFc . 11t.kY L'Y - • 1 � ,•/ •r ys �i r1 t • • PREPARED FOR EAST PARK, LLC CIO C.C. EDWARDS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. July 7, 2005 Sco.':Rie; -I P S410! c?.1. 4:*1 ft Tiletr 46 411 P #. Ira 7/7J-7 Raymond A. Coglas,P; Principal GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED EAST PARK RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WARREN G. MAGNUSON WAY BREMERTON, WASHINGTON ES-0125 Earth Solutions NW, LLC 2603— 151st Place Northeast, Redmond, Washington 98052 Ph: 425-284-3300 Fax: 425-284-2855 t_ p Earth (Solutions NW1« • July 7, 2005 ES-0125 Earth Solutions NW LLC East Park, LLC •Geotechnical Engineers do C.C. Edwards Construction Company, inc. •Geologists P.O. Box 1600 •Environmental Scientists Orting, Washington 98360 ••Construction Monitoring Attention: Mr. Jim Holland Dear Mr. Holland:. Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) is pleased to.present this report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed East Park Residential Development, Warren G. Magnuson Way, Bremerton,'Washington". Based on the conditions encountered during our fieldwork, the site is underlain primarily by native soils consisting of loose to dense silty sand, silty sand with gravel glacial till deposits, and occasional layers of sand and gravel. Areas of fill were observed throughout portions of the building sites. The existing fill areas are likely associated with previous grading activities related to the prior development. Groundwater seepage was not observed at the test sites. Perched zones of groundwater seepage, however, could be encountered in the site excavations, particularly in the deeper excavations. However, based on the results of our study, we do not anticipate extensive dewatering of excavations will be necessary for the proposed development. Based on the results of our study, the proposed residential structures can be supported on Conventional spread and continuous foundations bearing on competent native soil or structural fill. We anticipate that competent native soil suitable for support of foundations will be encountered at depths of approximately 2 to 3 feet below existing site grades. Where loose or unsuitable native or existing fill soils are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with suitable structural fill, may be necessary. There are steeply descending slopes bordering the west side of the site. At the time this report was prepared, a final site layout had not been prepared. However, based on the results of our study, for preliminary design purposes, a minimum _tw en five 25 foot,building setback from p _,steep -op Areas .; l_ , . .Was ( y, partb........ ,,the to of the slope can be considered. Additional) as of our study a preliminary assessment of site infiltration feasibility was completed. The soils encountered at the test sites consist primarily of sandy loam with isolated areas of fine sand (USDA Classification). These soils generally exhibit slow infiltration characteristics. Extensive deposits of clean sand and gravel deposits which arts conducive-fo infiltrafion were not encountered at the test sites, However, for preliminary design purposes, we have assigned infiltration rate values to the sandy loam and fine sand soils encountered at the test sites. 2603 151st PI.NE*Redmond,WA 98052•(425) 284-3300•FAX(425)284-2855 p East Park, LLC ES-0125 c/o C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 2 July 7, 2005 The opportunity to be of service to you is appreciated. If you have any questions regarding the content of this geotechnical engineering study, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Principal Earth Solutions NW,LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS ES-0125 • PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 General 1 Site History 2 Project Description 2 Surface 3 Subsurface 3 Groundwater 4 GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS ASSESSMENT 4 , Landslide Hazard Potential 4 Erosion Hazard ... 5 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 General ' 5 Site Preparation and Earthwork 6 Excavations and Slopes ... 7 Utility Trench Backfill 7 Pavement Sections 8 Rockeries and Modular Block Wails 8 Foundations 8 Foundation Setbacks 9 Slab-on-Grade Floors 9 Retaining Walls 10 Drainage 10 Preliminary Infiltration Evaluation 10 Seismic Considerations 11 LIMITATIONS 11 Additional Services 11 Earth Solutions NW,LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Cont'd ES-0126. GRAPHICS. PLATE 1 SITE VICINITY MAP PLATE 2 TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN PLATE 3 FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Test Pit Logs Appendix B Laboratory Test Results Sieve Analysis Results • Earth Solutions PNl,LLC GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED EAST PARK RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WARREN G. MAGNUSON WAY BREMERTON,WASHINGTON ES-0125 INTRODUCTION General This geotechnical engineering study was prepared for the proposed residential development to be constructed ';north of the intersection of Wheaton Way and Warren G. Magnuson Way in Bremerton, Washington. The purpose of this study was to assess subsurface conditions throughout the site, perform appropriate geotechnical analyses, and develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed development. Our scope of services for completing this geotechnical engineering study included the following: • A site geologic description including soil and groundwater conditions that may impact site development; • Recommendations for site grading, drainage, cut and fill slopes, structural fill placement and compaction, retaining walls, erosion control measures, and recommended pavement sections; • Recommendations for soil bearing capacity, subgrade preparation, and foundation support; • A preliminary assessment of the potential for infiltrating stormwater on a per-lot basis; • An assessment of the site soils and suitability for use as structural fill, and; Additional geotechnical recommendations, as appropriate. Earth Solutions NW,LLC .. r East Park, LLC ES-0125 do C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 2 July 7, 2005 Site History The subject property was previously used as military housing for the Bremerton Naval Station facility. The residential structures associated with the previous development have been removed. However, the previous site infrastructure including concrete paved arterial roads and asphalt paved parking areas remain. The building pad areas associated with the previous development are stepped along a series of shallow benches throughout the site. Previous grading associated with the previous building pad sites likely involved a series of cuts and fills. With respect to previous grading activities, there is also evidence of fill placed at the top of the slopes along the western site boundary. Presumably these fills were placed to create additional developable areas. We understand the previous building structures were removed approximately five to six years ago. In addition to the previous buildings and associated foundations, the majority of the previous utility lines were either abandoned or plugged. We understand there is one active sewer line that runs diagonally through the southeastern portion of the site. Prolect Description We understand the site will be developed with single-family residential lots, and associated site improvements. Site layout and elevations were not finalized at the time of this report. However, due to the topographic relief throughout the site, we anticipate cuts and fills of up to approximately 10 feet may be required to achieve design elevations. We anticipate the mass grading at this,site will largely use a balanced approach, with native cut soils utilized elsewhere on-site as structural fill. Site development plans were being developed at the time of this report. However, we anticipate development or grading activities are not planned for the steep descending slopes located along the western site boundary. At the time this report was prepared, specific building load values were not available. However, based on our experience with similar developments, we anticipate perimeter footing loads on the order of 1 to 2 kips per lineal foot and slab-on-grade loads of 150 pounds per square foot (psf). A stormwater plan was being developed at the time of this report. The feasibility of stormwater infiltration has been addressed in this study. Our preliminary findings indicate the presence of sandy loam and isolated areas of fine sand native soil deposits. These soils generally exhibit slow infiltration'characteristics. if the above design estimates are incorrect or change, ESNW should be contacted to review the recommendations in this report. ESNW should review the final design to verify that our geotechnical recommendations have been incorporated. Earth Solutions NW,LLC • East Park, LLC ES-0125 c/a C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 3 July 7, 2005 Surface The site is located north of Wheaton Way in Bremerton, Washington, and encompasses portions of both Warren G. Magnuson Way and Schley Way. The approximate site location is illustrated on the Vicinity Map (Plate 1). The site is roughly rectangular in shape, and is bordered to the north by existing residences, to the south by Wheaton Way, to the east by residential developments, and to the west by a steeply descending ravine. The site is currently vacant, with the exception of the existing asphalt and concrete roadways associated with the previous residential development. The existing roadway areas have not been maintained, and the condition of the existing roadways can generally be characterized as poor. The topography across the site generally descends gently to the west-northwest, with a series of terraces, and approximately 100 feet of elevation change across the site. The terraces appear to be the result of previous grading activities associated with the building pad construction for the previous residential development. Based on our observations, there were no visible signs of recent grading activity at the site. Steeply descending slopes are located along the western site boundary, and range in height up to approximately 60 feet. The slopes are located above an existing natural north-south drainage channel west of the site. Vegetation throughout the majority of the development areas of the site consists of field grass and occasional trees. Subsurface Twenty-four (24) test pits were excavated throughout the subject site for purposes of assessing soil conditions, and for purposes of characterizing and classifying the site soils. Please refer to the test pit logs provided in appendix A for a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions. Topsoil was encountered at all of our test sites and ranged in depths between four (4) and twelve (12) inches. Topsoil is not suitable for foundation or pavement support, and should not be mixed with soil to be used as structural fill.. The topsoil can be considered for use in landscape or non-structural areas, if desired. A representative of ESNW should observe stripping operations, and provide supplement recommendations for stripping depths, as appropriate. Existing fill areas were encountered at the site. The fill consisted of medium dense silty sand with gravel (Unified Soil Classification SM) and was primarily observed along the tdp of the slopes located on the western boundary, and along the downslope margins of the existing terraced building pads. In general, the depth of the existing fill observed at the test sites was on the order of approximately 2 to 3 feet A deeper fill area however was observed at test pit location TP-7, located in the northwesterly corner of the site. Underlying the topsoil, up to three feet of loose silty sand and silty sand with gravel (SM) was encountered. Underlying the loose soils, medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel (SM) Earth Solutions NW,LLC r East Park, LLC ES-0125 c/o C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. • Page 4 July 7, 2005 containing occasional layers of poorly graded sand with silt and gravel (SP-SM). and poorly graded sand (SP) were encountered extending to the maximum exploration depths. An isolated deposit of silt (ML) was also observed at one of the test sites. The geologic map of the area identifies glacially consolidated till deposits throughout the site and surrounding areas. The Kitsap County Soil Survey indicates the site is underlain primarily by Shelton glacial till (unit 2) with areas of Kilchis weathered basalt (unit 3) in the northeastern quarter, and Harstine gravelly sandy loam glacial till (unit 17) along the western flanks. The Shelton and Harstine series soils are characterized by a. matrix of non-sorted silt, sand and gravel in a compact or dense condition at depth. The Kilchis series soils are composed of weathered basalt soils extending to depths of approximately 25 to 40 inches, overlying bedrock. We did not encounter any Kilchis series soil at our test sites. In general, the soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork generally correlate with the geologic map and soil survey designations. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was not encountered at the time of our fieldwork (June 9, 2005). However, perched seepage zones are relatively common in glacial soil deposits. Due to the anticipated grading and associated cuts planned for the site, groundwater seepage may be encountered in deeper site excavations. Groundwater seepage rates and elevations fluctuate depending on many factors„ including precipitation duration and intensity, the time of year, and soil conditions. In general, groundwater flow rates are higher during the wetter, winter months. GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS ASSESSMENT The steep slopes located along the western site boundary meet the current criteria detailed in Chapter 21.22.100 of the City of Bremerton Municipal Code for geologically hazardous areas. The specific geologic hazards present at the subject site are related to landslide potential and erosion hazard. The slopes generally meet or exceed 40 percent in gradient and range in height up to approximately 60 feet. Site development plans were being developed at the time of this report. However, we anticipate that no modifications or grading will be planned for the steeply descending slopes located along the western site boundary. Landslide Hazard Potential As part of our report preparation, we assessed the descending slopes located along the western site boundary for instability. Much of the slope surface was obscured by dense undergrowth. During our fieldwork, we observed portions of the slope that were accessible for signs of recent or large scale instability. The slopes are heavily vegetated with a mature forest and dense understory. No scarps, groundwater seeps, or hummocky terrain were observed during our site visit. We did observe several arched tree trunks. However, this condition does not explicitly indicate slope instability. Rather, this is a natural process whereby loose surficial Earth Solutions NW,LLC • East Park, LLC ES-0125 do C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 5 July 7, 2005 • soils mantling slopes become loose or saturated and lose shear strength. We also observed signs of fill placed along portions of the top of the descending slopes. It is unclear when this occurred, however, fill may have been placed along the top of the slopes during the installation of a sewer line constructed as part of the original site development. The soils encountered at the site consist generally of dense glacial till. This soil unit is generally stable and can maintain rather steep angles of repose for long periods without failing. In our opinion, based on the soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork, the presence of dense vegetation, and the lack of any signs of deep-seated rotational failures along the slopes, the site slopes are in a stable condition and the proposed development will not increase the potential for slope instability, provided the recommendations detailed in this report are followed. ESNW should review the site layout to verify that adequate building setbacks are utilized and to provide additional recommendations, as necessary. Erosion Hazard The soils that underlie the steep slopes along the western site boundary are comprised primarily of dense glacial till deposits with heavy vegetative growth. In general, the glacial till deposits located on the slopes present a severe erosion hazard and rapid runoff. At the time of this report, no modifications or grading was planned for the steep slopes. Provided the recommendations detailed in this report are followed, in our opinion, the proposed development will not increase the potential for erosion hazard,at tt asite Water should.not beAllowed..to.flow_ouer.the.slopes,. ,lnterce for swales,placed�along the top of the slopes should be installed to redirect any surface water to an approved drainage system, as propriate.:'.-.._........ , _.__ �_ ..�_,...._ .. ....._}.,._.. . _, DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General • • Based on the results of our study, in our opinion construction of a residential development at the subject site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. The primary geotechnical considerations associated with the proposed development include site earthwork, structural fill placement, and the suitability of the on-site soils for use as structural fill. An assessment of site infiltration feasibility is also an important geotechnical consideration for the project. In our opinion, the proposed residential structures can be supported on conventional spread and continuous foundations bearing on competent native soils or structural fill. Where native soils are present, we anticipate that competent native soil suitable for support of foundations will be exposed at depths of approximately 2 to 3 feet. Where loose or unsuitable native or existing fill soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications ofstructural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill may be necessary, depending on encountered conditions. Earth Solutions NW,ULC East Park, LLC ES-0125 do C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 6 July 7, 2005 In our opinion, the soils generated from cuts throughout the site should generally be suitable for use as structural fill. The silty sand and silty sand with gravel soils encountered at the exploration sites are moderately moisture sensitive, and placement and compaction of these soils during wet weather conditions will likely be difficult. Depending on the moisture content of the soils at the time of construction, moisture conditioning of the on-site soils may be necessary prior to use as structural fill. The soils encountered at the test sites consist)arg.ely.,of sandy„Igam, with occasional areas of fine.sand (USDA Classification). With respect to infiltration, sandy loam is generally characterized as having a relatively slow m i tratioj rate. In our opinion, the deRosits.. f fine sand were inconsistent, and ,cannot reasonably,be. relied .upon fpr infiltration Widespread • deposits of sand and gravel outwash soils that are typically well suited to infiltration systems were not encountered at the site. However, for preliminary design purposes, we have provided infiltration rates for sandy loam and fine sand soils in the "Infiltration Evaluation" section of this report. This study has been prepared for the exclusive use of East Park, LLC and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, Is made. This study has been prepared in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. Site Preparation and Earthwork With respect to earthwork, the primary considerations at this site are related to fill placement and compaction, suitability of the native soils for use as structural fill, and appropriate erosion control measures. From a geotechnical standpoint, the soils encountered at the test sites are generally suitable for use as structural fill. However, the site soils are moderately moisture sensitive, and successful use of the on-site soils will largely be dictated by the moisture content of the soils and weather conditions at the time of placement and compaction. The soils encountered at the test sites.were generally in a moist to wet condition at the time of the exploration (June 2005). Soils encountered during site excavations that are excessively over the optimum moisture content may require moisture conditioning prior to placement and compaction. During periods of dry weather, the on-site soils should generally be suitable for use as structural fill, provided the moisture content is at or near the optimum level at the time of placement. Successful placement and compaction of the on-site soils during periods of extended precipitation will likely be difficult. If the on-site soils cannot be successfully compacted, the use of an imported soil or a soil treatment may be necessary,. Imported soil intended for use•as structural fill should consist of a well graded granular soil with a maximum aggregate size of four inches, and a moisture content that is at or near the optimum level. During wet weather conditions, imported soil intended for use as structural fill should consist of a well graded Earth Solutions NW,LLC East Park, LLC ES-0125 do C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 7 July 7, 2005 granular soil with a fines content of 5 percent or less defined as the percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction. Structural fill is defined as compacted soil placed in foundation, slab-on-grade, and roadway areas. Fills placed to construct permanent slopes and throughout retaining wall and utility trench backfill areas are also considered structural fill. Soils placed in structural areas should be compacted to a relative compaction of 90 percent, based on the maximUrn dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Method (ASTM D-1557-00) and placed in maximum twelve (12) inch lifts. In pavement areas, the upper twelve (12) inches of the structural fill should be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 95 percent. Temporary erosion control measures should include, at a minimum, silt fencing placed along the downslope perimeter of the construction envelope. As appropriate, temporary construction entrances should consist of at least six inches of quarry spalls to help minimize off-site soil tracking and to help provide a stable temporary road base. Excavations and Slopes The Federal and state Occupation Safety and Health Administration (OSHA/WISHA) classifies soils in terms of minimum safe slope inclinations. Based on the soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork, the site soils encountered to depths of up to four feet would be classified by OSHA/WISHA as Type C. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type C soils should be sloped at an inclination of 1.5H:1V, or flatter. The site soils encountered to depths of greater than four feet would generally be classified by OSHA/WISHA as Type A and B. Temporary slopes over four feet in height in Type A soils can be sloped at an inclination of 0:75H:1V and 1H:1V, or flatter, respectively. If appropriate slopes cannot be achieved, temporary shoring may be necessary to provide excavation support. Permanent slopes should maintain a gradient of 2H:1 V, or flatter, and should be planted with an appropriate species-Of vegefation to enhance stability and to minimize erosion. A representative of ESNW should observe temporary and permanent slopes to verify that the inclination is appropriate, and to provide additional grading recommendations, as necessary. Utility Trench Backfill In our opinion, the soils observed at the test sites are generally suitable for support of utilities. Organic or highly compressible soils encountered in the trench excavations should not be used for supporting utilities. in general, the on-site soils observed at the test sites should be suitable for use as structural backfill in the utility trench excavations, provided the soil is at or near the optimum moisture content at the time of placement and compaction. Moisture conditioning of the soils may be necessary at some locations prior to use as structural fill. Utility trench backfill should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or to the applicable specifications of the city or county jurisdiction, as appropriate. Earth Solutions NW,LLC East Park, LLC ES=0125 do C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 8 July 7, 2005 Pavement Sections The existing asphalt and concrete pavement areas were observed to be in a generally poor condition; In our opinion, resurfacing or replacement of the exiting roadways would be necessary if these alignments are to be incorporated into the new development. The performance of site pavements is largely related to the condition of the underlying subgrade. To ensure adequate pavement performance, the subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition when subjected to proofrolling with a loaded dump truck. Structural fill in pavement areas should be compacted to the specifications detailed in the "Site Preparation and Earthwork"section of this report. It is possible that soft, wet, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade areas may still exist after base grading activities. Any areas containing unsuitable or yielding subgrade conditions will require remedial measures such as overexcavation and thicker crushed rock or structural fill sections prior to pavement. For relatively lightly loaded pavements subjected to automobiles and occasional truck traffic, we recommend the following pavement section: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) placed over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB), or; • Two inches of AC placed over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). The AC, ATB and CRB materials should conform to WSDOT specifications. Heavier truck-traffic areas generally require thicker pavement sections depending on site usage, pavement life expectancy, and site traffic. ESNW can provide appropriate pavement section design recommendations for truck traffic areas and the City of Bremerton right-of-way improvements, as necessary. Additionally, the City of Bremerton Road Standards may supersede the recommendations provided in this report. Rockeries and Modular Block Walls We anticipate that rockeries or modular block walls may be utilized at this site. In our opinion, the use of rockeries or modular block walls at this site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Rockeries or modular block walls over four feet in exposed height will require an engineered design. ESNW can provide engineered rockery and modular block wall designs, upon request. At a minimum, ESNW should review the final wall locations and heights, as necessary. Foundations - Based on the results of our study, the proposed residential buildings can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on competent native soil or structural fill. Where native soils are present, we anticipate that competent native soil suitable for support of foundations will be exposed at depths of approximately 2 to 3 feet. Where loose or unsuitable Earth Solutions NW,LLC • East Park, LLC ES-0125 do C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 9 July 7, 2005 • native or existing fill soil conditions are exposed at foundation subgrade elevations, compaction of the soils to the specifications of structural fill, or overexcavation and replacement with structural fill, may be necessary. Foundations bearing on competent native soil or structural fill should be designed using an allowable soil bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred (2,500) psf. For short term wind and seismic loading, a one-third increase in the allowable soil bearing capacity can be assumed. With structural loading as expected, total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of approximately three-quarters of an inch. The majority of the settlements should occur during construction, as dead loads are applied. Passive resistance and friction acting on 'the foundations can be assumed for purposes of , calculating resistance to lateral loading.•Assuming the foundations are backfilled with structural fill, passive resistance can be calculated using an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of three hundred fifty (350) pounds per cubic foot (pct). For calculating friction, a coefficient of 0.40 should be used. A factor-of-safety of 1.5 has been applied to these passive resistance values. Foundation Setbacks Steeply descending slopes border the western site boundary. The site layout was being developed at the time of this report. However, we anticipate that single-family residences will possibly be constructed near the top of these slopes. For preliminary design considerations, in our opinion, a minimum building.setback.of twenty-live.(25) feet should be maintained from the ..192,_of the slopes bordertng..„the w,estem..siteboundary In our opinion, based on the soil conditions encountered during our fieldwork and our understanding or the proposed project, a minimum building setback of twenty-five (25) feet will not adversely impact the stability of the existing slopes. ESNW should review the site layout to verify that adequate setbacks are used, and to provide additional recommendations, as necessary. • Slab-On-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors for the proposed buildings should be supported on a firm and unyielding subgrade consisting of competent native soil or structural fill. Unstable or yielding areas of the subgrade should be recompacted or overexcavated and replaced with suitable structural fill prior to construction of the slab. A capillary break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free draining crushed rock or gravel should be placed below the slab. The free draining material should have a fines content of 5 percent or less (percent passing the #200 sieve, based on the minus three-quarter inch fraction). In areas where slab moisture is undesirable, installation of a vapor barrier below the slab should be considered. Earth Solutions NW,LLC East Park, LLC ES-0125 do C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 10 July 7, 2005 • Retaining Walls Retaining walls should be designed to resist earth pressures and any applicable surcharge loads. For design, the following parameters can be assumed for retaining wall design: • Active Earth Pressure (Yielding Wall) 35 pcf(equivalent fluid) • At-Rest Earth Pressure (Restrained Wall) 50 pcf • Traffic Surcharge (Passenger Vehicles) 70 psf(rectangular distribution) • Passive Resistance 350 pcf(equivalent fluid) • Coefficient of Friction 0.40 Additional surcharge loading from foundations, sloped backfill, or other loading should be included in the retaining wall design, as appropriate. Drainage should be provided behind retaining walls such that hydrostatic pressures do not develop. If drainage is not provided, hydrostatic pressures should be included in the wall design, as appropriate. ESNW should review retaining wall designs to verify that appropriate earth pressure values have been incorporated into the design, and to provide additional recommendations, as necessary. Retaining walls should be backfilled with free draining material that extends along the height of the wall, and a distance of at least eighteen (18) inches behind the wall. The upper one foot of the wall backfill can consist of a less permeable (surface seal) soil, if desired. A rigid, perforated drain pipe should be placed along the base of the wall, and connected to an appropriate discharge location. Drainage Groundwater seepage was not observed at the time of our fieldwork (June 9, 2005). However, the presence of perched groundwater seepage may be encountered in the deeper site and utility excavations.. Temporary measures to control groundwater seepage and surface water runoff during construction would likely involve interceptor trenches and sumps, as necessary. In our opinion, perimeter drains should be installed at or near the invert of the building footings. A typical footing drain detail is provided on Plate 3 of this report. Preliminary Infiltration Evaluation As previously discussed, the sandy loam soils that were predominantly encountered at the test sites have a relatively slow infiltration rate. Extensive deposits of sand and gravel outwash soils that are typically conducive to infiltration were not encountered at the test sites. However, for preliminary design purposes, we have provided the following assessment of infiltration rates for the site soils. Earth Solutions NW,LLC • East Park, LLC ES-0125 do C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. Page 11 July 7, 2005 As part of our report preparation, we evaluated the site soils for the potential to infiltrate stormwater runoff. We collected representative samples of site soils at various depths and performed textural analyses to assess the potential infiltration capacity and rates for design. The textural classifications were performed in accordance with the USDA sieve method. Based on the results of our textural analyses, the site soils consist primarily of sandy loam and isolated areas of fine sand (USDA Classification). Ultimate infiltration rates for these soils are provided in Table 6.3 of the Pierce County Stormwater Management and Site Development Manual. These rates are provided below: USDA Classification Ultimate Infiltration Rate Sandy Loam kwy 'i �: 30 min. /Inch Fine Sand 15 min. /inch For design, the above ultimate infiltration rates should be increased by a factor of two (2) for design. If necessary, further evaluation of infiltration feasibility can be performed during mass grading of the site, when soil conditions throughout a large portion of the site will be exposed. Seismic Considerations The 2003 International Building Code specifies several soil profiles that are used as a basis for seismic design of structures. Based on the soil conditions observed at the test sites, Site Class C, from table 1615.1.1, should be used for design. In our opinion, liquefaction susceptibility at this site is low. The relative density of the site soils and the lack of a uniform, shallow groundwater table is the primary basis for this designation. LIMITATIONS The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the test sites may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. Additional Services . ` ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and consultation services during construction. Earth Solutions NW,LLC c , , . . . . . . . • . - . ------------. -- -, .-- 1w- 1 ,....I.,,,i -"---gi 6111131111)g- it ! 1— "- 1. r • ,e'oraCif TII . ! 3:' ... , 4)7...; ''.10 °.. ,4. a 4, r .: r , LI ..: _%. !stoic.atm.',. . .__._!___--4.....,• OROWD \f=,,,' ../ /S61ND i„, . *. i C''. • 1 I rj 1...,...0 IA on ho ... ;'.-..., t" ,„•-.41 N. • • ... -, Mt!.7 I % • ,4 /a r •,* itke.,,wc.. 1/4•47,, ' •T ";• ."- r.r ... .i,..;..!, ,,,,,•Now e,pr, ..0... ,..4..r... ..1 er urr.rrr net st 14 f"-•""" "r"""""""""-\""*"."'""'"--"""" 1.,..;;;,7.7"5"7.•:::---1---"---7,,?:... r• „ . ,,,... 4 ,, Lu - — 1 ,...,... , igi• .-4. .. ,.....:1 .1, .4;.• .,.....,, ., - •. ...„........, : A .!.-1 • ...• ....c,..3,‘, A ..,, I, ,..? : .. ..., .. , , .. 4,.....-0 , i .. 1,., .,• %.,,re,..1 ,6 ;•.t.. .• ,,,,,.. . ._ , ...,c, , •,. , i: \ •••.jr11: '•.4.1.-P.:11 IT.!1 i.01r1J • 7' •g..,: :‘-4.'g ti , . •. ... Y.. .4......•..• .. . '''.., • •'i: ,i, • ,1 . l'. ... • . .. • i ' .s • • • •• 11 I,:R:!!IS ' ..•• . If .' •1 ..; • V• 4* '• t•.4.. t•'. WWI t.1...,...;:•.1••• • v.li •••"•• I ta•A. • ••"r1. s.I a et ,...... ' S.0 Vi, • ,If 44..' IL ! '• ' ''. .,. .. I , lel MOUS 7, ... -. ,\ t.4 ...::"..*--,1/4.•-p---;.....,,..:-.• .....„, . i • i a.„,,,,,10:)r.t.;:ty -,.1...,„. i erl.r in, '<tie., ,--. •40„,,ovoQz... 014/1y ‘• ..—..-.--........ -. .1.-,.. ...i.. 4...th....!.1.0; _ti•.1.\••,.............. -...1.I 0,14.11 • tk ,. ,;IF , . 1.....:s .......111,,,,„,,,,,,,..., , . 7„.14,7,• .. ? 1,1..' 1 , ,11 • ,, L.. ....-/„. .. ir ,.. 5„-. - I •I i • • , % A ,>. -., ••-7.n.dt:tx tt n. -01. •cs it s\)44t.'.2\s4 1 'lb .ISM',1 ' ).Pl.1 y ' 2.. . it OILS i i 1 \\ - ,... 7./P1••'''' \.•4 ,4,IC.,,, •YiaSs••hr. ;,.!1/4 ''s 1 ..--ftlheissill V;0.1'" I ,i II Øt,.. IZ,444'; as - .. )1151'•_GPI; r,:f Mammas.. /.. I. ' \ ,•-: .14, -IV w.,,•• elttnesp. .•••••••• . .„ .. . . 1 (....:.1 ,,::/•• i ,S " ,....) ---•.v.erl in , N i / , REM •-r4.1.• ' .. • frtUri 01 A I •I ERTON• ..i,° it..., ,1,,,,i. • Yea, te I • • . . C.Itt . ,).; • .1 .921.1.ntS, •. • vcati RD . i; ,. / r , • ett -- -.'---. ', PORT ORCHARD ,. .-1 .,,e_.••• ,,,,,,---.....„, .,v,IVA 't, i I • " ' ' • .r : i.orvivitt sr I r ori ectro. "."–'7"1"01–,•-•,I. • 1-,,......-4– , ,04",,4,.., , e 4 , ci. 4,.. * $r•,, ‘ . or–CS -------•, -- =4 '.I•.si v ••. PiStd.wy :.....• 1ukefli Colby ''' / 9. , 1 ' 7., „. r .. z. • ,,-si.. I ..:: . . ,.....,p4 .; :( . • rs 4 ' .`"C":•44,4,40,. II I i • .. I §0 op •••g.i7. n•lion SI It •t'l „le tor#ILI& • " / 44 1 y '''' OA • c"' ,., 4' .1. ..• . • :iv 7 . .. iit ,,,, , 0..,, 4.a w gnu *mum In it' % .•r; :-..' UK V....11f'''. '-i-t.,4;:. s ... --'' ! *.: 9<, !4.•.? N''''.'r- * P• Ir Alt ,1:::•;',le'',!,... t L'-'"•'''' , 04 Si st.,;:artttv ,.- Ir 0 t.to...titotrolo I,tree,•I ' 'M .. • AV . t.8 •••• :', •00. 4 . • .' .1...1.-.t,._. . I ...,/ - it: K I/SAP 4, 1,•• ". , :.1 •..., •-, • ,. . . ' 1. 1 ., . . . W44* ti, •J ...' .:(/.irt y.,, aillttry , 4:- " • • • : ..ei • e. • : . I ,4,, •no r:1 tts ttt :s i 1 •1 , a, •i • 4 40 g 4 A v lima Li: / . • .: .o. Do 10- ... .. , it m g la SAX., St .... i .. .0• SI „ . I :. .? • 0.111.1110 NI ,. ' IA0 •NM it.• .. -..C.‘.t.1WA.S.411.l'IlGTON • . L'I !•,.,,,,,, ‘.?/ • ••' raw . ;;..•.. • ••4 : 1 s' - 9 flOMIA MD (i,•! .••• .t. : ' 1 • • $1' Zs, S.:1 • IJ , / 1 -. : , i 1J14...•4 I i .,•• a -:. 2 . A - — ... )".' 1 .,... ,.. .,,, . • , . , 4, ,./ 1 i or... . . ,,,.„,„0.,. ., . . ':•0 .' 4 ti Ly W 41041re; .. tt • " I• 3.1.14I g .o 1 ( . 4.1 .v.t. io u, 1 .... ' ,o. 4. .., t .,,Ag.Ain. • , i i. :.g. .1 i I 1 • sk• Nu • • •• . , 4, :10,V:A ..I0 1 /31".• KING .. ..._.._..... • aura:j". •'''' aft" 1 FL -. c.,,, 41 tI III • l•il.. SI Sr 14/M1I .0),I, kb V vothnt t 7,1 ,, s,sin Li a ,. „, 4 wt •... t:.,„. ...,. . IA ..1..7;., 1.11- •.71"-N.- trri ti. , 1 m) .... „i "... 2"frl ,e' ii A ,:v -i f." ..,,,.. A.ft• r". so•411', ....) / ? . w.Couto a:ii cm : * ,•.1 i .4.1..:-41...;R:.:, e,, k 31 \...it:k.,.....4"COUNTY"*...1*' .-,-.). • 1 E., .., 1011.11-'''V...1 51 FITS071 1 . 44 * ,,t.:2 ,. Cli i MI III St !IP,III.. Z .•:-•7s.. 11 .10.04'; 10 0,,,,, amtm/ '. 2 i ,f• ,4,..Sic MCC 10 r4 a 1 eiR,.. ' ' • ur •• v .;Io .s. :..- ..I., i ' NA10,!if 1 4..--fl ,.....• g i....... LI ,4...f\+i. / '; V..' *•'1011v • / ' . 140,111toe g, , '" ) 4-* : j • • a raw or si 44 y au 1 . I: rlotohnds1 _ _ _.,..._ X ...._ to . SAl ettO.1 :O ' *•. r"' $ . ...,1,4 o g • "II'`1' '' •:_;*;.-7-' i g net '. _.• t' 2 'AA: -. ,7. T. ., i.,, • r: Ntrop.r....1 i! , ., 2 ' r...tro. ...,. 1 [(Will ., , `-,r'4.,‘; --A° " • k IW NORTH Suns `AI 3 -1011S mi II ift, •• i Reference: #1r4IIN %Wm; . • . .:4,s,--, ;• • - . . „•:, ;-• st,,,,c,,r,,,t•.70,...t.c,„-,., , . •. • • •;•-,..,t- - -,-,••• ; ! ' , Pacific Northwest .. • .0 -:,,...t..4-;,.....1....,. .• • • • .. ! Map 174 40 , . , . • Vicinity Map By Thomas Brothers Maps I Dated 2005 East Park i. Bremerton, Washington • • NOTE:This plate may contain areas of color.ESNW cannot be Drwn. GLS Date June 2005 Proj. No. 0125 1 i responsible for any subsequent misinterpretation of the information VIEMMEMIMIIIMII•1111 A 1 resulting from black&white reproductions of this plate. Checked SSR Date 6/21/05 Plate 1 l ..1. • IV 17 1 I eft i SI— I I't' .-1 rI` r—, r---; — o Vii— _1_ 1 _I_ 41 it —I— y I N1 to W _ I4 A 1 14 aI zi 1 I x I m i I N —i_ I z t I a i i Ip 1 II N O I O d O / b ' . NORTH / r:/ 1 O b / N O Op ;,. IN m i- 1 _ tp 5 ry W "'I `, ', !Will ill , , 1 I m m,oa.W' \, '111111 r __III XnmmDm Ngogeg tC t0 m N-I a co the 3 mN cin.5. $ m m :r 1;1 li P 1 +tI to N O 0 : filr 11 N g o z '12 m . c)§ i...11..111 moi" !ions !Wm Test Pit Location Plan N r-' ,11Atttifins t„ o o z m m •�_ p,�„ .I, .. East Park i 111 u I ::�;.�� l m Bremerton,Washington .: -•g:, 1 • ▪ A • 4•.A • •••e • i • . 4 . o'• • • �� ° ��•..� •_ Slope • • A ^'rte iJlV Miii} r f 2"(Min.) Perforated Rigid Drain Pipe (Surround with 1"Rock) NOTES: • Do NOT tie roof downspouts to Footing Drain. • Surface Seal to consist of SCHEMATIC ONLY-NOT OT SCALE 12"of less permeable, suitable NOTA CONSTRUCTION DRAWING soil.Slope away from building. LEGEND: Surface Seal; native soil or other low permeability material. Girth '' II S•S�S•S• �Illlllthiltiftirr •. 1 W{{r o,tutions NViti 1"Drain Rock :me ring,Co 2ruu10 ;1'111 .tc •S•S•S•S• fi N .. •,r074menta Sacncr> FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL East Park Bremerton, Washington Dom. GLS Date July 2005 Proj. No. 0125 Checked SSR Date 7/6/05 Plate 3 I APPENDIX A SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ES-0125 The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating twenty-four (24) test pits. The approximate test pit locations are illustrated on Plate 2 of this report. The test pit logs are provided in this Appendix. The subsurface exploration was completed in June 2005. The test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of thirteen (13) feet below existing grades. Logs of the test pits excavated by ESNW are presented in Appendix A. The final logs represent the interpretations of the field logs and the results of laboratory analyses. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. • Earth Solutions NW,LLC • Earth Solutions NWLLC SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOLS TYPICAL GRAPH LETTER DESCRIPTIONS CLEAN '101144. WELL-GRADED GRAVELS,GRAVEL• GRAVEL GRAVELS • bib• 6 GW SAND MIXTURES.LITTLE OR NO AND • GRAVELLY d Cr,d t FINES SOILS 0' POORLY-GRADED GRAVELS, (LITTLE OR NO FINES) o D�o 0` GP GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES,LITTLE QUI Q o 0'11• OR NO FINES COARSE GRAINED GRAVELS WITH •0�� SOILS MORE THAN 50% FINES �o '`3ii D GM SILTY GRAVELS,GRAVEL-SAND- OF COARSE p , SILT MIXTURES FRACTION °• .S RETAINED ON NO. it f�t P. 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE �;.i 0,• G.`. CLAYEY GRAVELS,GRAVEL.SAND - AMOUNT OF FINES) �;1:%� .• CLAY MIXTURES �I: / f_ MORE THAN 50% SAND CLEAN SANDS :.::::- SW SANDS,LITRE OR NO FINES WELL-GRADED SANDS. LLY OF MATERIAL IS AND •'•'' LARGER THAN :•:;:;•;:::�:• No.zoo SIEVE SANDY ••••••••••••••• '' SIZE SOILS (LITTLE DR NO FINES) POORLY-GRADED SANDS, SP flims GRAVELLY SAND.LITRE SR NO SANDS WITH ' ' ;f .*4:::: MORE THAN Sox FINES ,• .�'• .T SM SILTY SANDS,SI1N®•SILT PASS1 ION OF COARSE t,• 1 ; M�7URE3 4 SIEVE (APPRECIABLE SC CLAYEY SAND_CLAY AMOUNT OF FINES) 4 INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE ML cStA/44Y FlNE SFLOUANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO FINE SILTSALJOUID UMIT jMEDIUM PLASTICITY,GRAVELLY GRAINED CLAYS LESS THAN 50 j C" CLAYS,SANDY CLAYS,SILTY SOILS CLAUS,LEAN CLAYS OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY MORE THAN 50% __ — — OF MATERIAL IS INORGANIC SILTS,MICACEOUS OR SMALLER THAN MU DIATOMACEOUS FINE SAND OR NO.200 SIEVE SILTY SOILS SIZE SILTS LIQUID LIMIT CLAS GREATER THAN 50 j CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH AND Norve U ®H HIIGGH PLASTICITY,ORGANICI TO IANIC SILTS feittree HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS I.u a a 3 PT PEAT,HUMUS,SWAMP SOILS wl.H u u HIGH ORGANIC CONTENTS DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classifications. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a pmper understanding of the nature of the material presented in the attached logs. , I ' Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER.TP-1W)iii tg4n . IA rill 2803 151st Pl.NE Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax 4252842855 • CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.VVIghleaton DATE STARTED 8/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 420' TEST PR SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV ASsodetes GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD Al TIME OF EXCAVATION — • LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR . AT.END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsolt&Sod 4":field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — Ui tr g TESTS (t8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o scl• 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist ,o. • SM - Brown silty SAND with gravel,dense,moist MC=10% .•:. -slightly cemented 5 SM ••• .•:. -decrease in silt content -.• MC=10% • 7.0 Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet. gri 0 • LI! • Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-2 tl•rrltr 2603151stPl.NE • 'S l u l i,i n Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 ti ,4. Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 420' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4`:field crass AFTER EXCAVATION — W N Sc7 o a? TESTS 0 a.O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION O • 0 �,�;�;• Brown silty SAND,loose to medium dense,moist(Possible Fill) SM .••+ MC=12% • • Fines=21% :❖i• 2.5 - Brown silty SAND with gravel,dense,moist -slightly cemented 5 -becomes gray MC=9% 6.0 Test pit terminated at 6.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 6.0 feet. • • C5 w r B v ri .a` J W QJ • Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-3 Earth 2603 151st Pl.NE "14)1uii4)n. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 • NK`''' Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 • CLIENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 619105 GROUND ELEVATION 425' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates' GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil 8 Sod 4":field press AFTER EXCAVATION — , w a m • U Ia? TESTS N MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Z ' 0 0 Brown silty SAND,loose to medium dense,moist SM 25 —�' Brown silty SAND with gravel,dense,moist - - SM 5. ''5.0 -refusal on very dense till MC=896 Test pit terminated at 5.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 5.0 feet. • a 0 vi c a. a Lei m W r • Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-4 F.f rtti l 2603151st PI.NE • 'S4Ji1/11449. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 ,4 j Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT CC Edwards Construction Co.,Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 415' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates • GROUND WATER LEVELS: • EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR • CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 3":field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — r w a. c) TESTS H g- MATERIAL DESCRIPTION •0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist ` - SM t.s •• Grayish brown silty SAND with gravel,dense,moist MC=8% •: -slightly cemented SM 5 :• MC=9% 7.0 Test pit terminated at 7.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 7.0 feet. z C, [7 t7 O OD W Z W C9.. Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-5. F:f rt h 2803151st PI,NE • I 111141 n. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co.,Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION• Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 405'. TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 41':field crass AFTER EXCAVATION — , w rV1 U TESTS N MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CI z e, 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,loose to medium dense,moist SM t.s Brown silty SAND with gravel,dense,moist • - - MC=9% -slightly cemented -becomes gray 5 SM 10 MC=9% !• : Test pit terminated at 13.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 13.0 feet. a • 0 F CD a C9 • N O J w5J yyi S �1 Earth Solutions NW,LLC f�irtt; 2803it;1stPl NE TEST PIT NUMBER TP-6 Solution- Redmond,WA•98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 \W] Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co.,Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 390' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Death of Tarrson 8 Sod 4":field crass AFTER EXCAVATION — w Ig TESTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION O 0 •.•�.�.• Brown silty SANDWith gravel,loose,moist(Possible FlU) . • - - SM ••.• �•••�+•2.0 Gray silty SAND,dense,moist _ - MC=796 Fines=18% 5 SM -trace gravel - r - MC=6% :!'• r9.0 • Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet. o • v n H N r�0 a} F OD Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-7 Earth 2603151st PI.NE �li�tiOfl. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington _ DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 370' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Death of Toosoll&Sod 6':blackberry brambles AFTER EXCAVATION — grO w v. �' TESTS q. 8MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o 0 %'•'�'+ Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist(Possible Fill) - ••O:• - - MC=11% ::::$ 5 SM - - •••O• r L�� -decrease in silt content • I- - ••. ;•; -slight caving 10 ,'••••.10.0 Brown poorly graded SAND with silt and gravel,dense,moist SP- SM • -contains cobbles MC=7% • - •,12.0 ' Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 12.0 feet c� y F N N d uSJ, CO 6 • • Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-8 Earth 2603151st PI.NE 'M)iutuin- Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 380' TEST PIT SIZE _' EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Death of Topsoil&Sod 2":field crass • AFTER EXCAVATION — • N g iutg TESTS H MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 13 ' 0 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist -contains cobbles -decrease in gravel content -dense MC=10% Fines=17% 5 SM 'r :tet 10 MC=6% : ' 10.0 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 10.0 feet. •F a c� fA F d N N a 5 a F- 'x • m 1.. Y '1 Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-9. • 1 d rt h 2603 151st PL NE Soluliu!n. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 %1114,' Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT CC Edwards Construction Co.,Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,•Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 360' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 46:field crass AFTER EXCAVATION — v TESTS ai e 8 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 • Brown silty SAND with gravel,loose to medium dense,moist(Fill) - - ...e.. •... SM *X+' -trace debris MC=11% ••• ee •'�.L 3.0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,dense,moist 5 SM -decrease in silt content -occasional cobbles _ -becomes gray MC 5% Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. • Bottom of test pit at 8.0 feet. 0 ai • UI JJ •• m W ' C7 [IA rib 03 5 lution NE ,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TEl 'tiol,ul141n.: Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF i \b'I' Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 345' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Death of Togpoll&Sod 8":field grass • AFTER EXCAVATION — •C FEW VJ C1.• a? TESTS ai O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Z ' 0 0 Brown silty SAND,loose,moist(Fill) L _ SM •• - - '•'•' ❖•• •i!�li•3.0 Brown silty SAND,medium dense,moist,trace gravel r ^— h_5 MC=9% Fines=16% . • -dense _ - SM •• ': -slightly cemented - - '•r .r, MC=8% L Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 9.0 feet. • Ol OJ W L. i Earth Solutions NW,LLC ih 2603151st PI.NE TEST PIT NUMBER TP-11 'NA"1,1 a ,' Redmond,WA.98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 VWf Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washington DATE STARTED 8/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 350' EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR BV Associates TEST PIT SIZEGROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Death of Topsoil&Sod r:field arass AFTER EXCAVATION — • tw w V ^ w m Z(ry TESTS J� MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Z 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,loose to medium dense,moist MC=9% -dense 5 -becomes gray SM 10 MC=7% 120 Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 12.0 feet. • vi 0 a 0 0 d ►- 0 m z c� Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-12 Li rth 2603 151st PI.NE • 11.4)111114 n• Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NATIVE East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COtiIPLEfED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 360' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR . CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOT NOTES Death of Tooson&Sod 41':field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — r 6 as O vTESTS y• MATERIAL DESCRIPTION t 4.0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,loose,moist(Fill) - SM t o -trace construction debris • Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist -becomes gray MC=9% -dense -slightly cemented 5 SM - MC=9% r?, •_. •:8.5 Test pit terminated at 8.5 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 8.5 feet. • C i3 a. d 0 JO 12 171 _ r. Mh Earth Solutions NW,LLC 2603 151st PI.NE TEST PIT NUMBER TP-13 'SOW q twn,' Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 NWI Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 370' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TINE OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4":field grass AFTER EXCAVATION -- r w W UJ t3 cv a TESTS y J MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 2 z 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist •1. MC=9% Fines=15% -dense -slightly cemented 5 •+;•: SM -decrease in gravel 10 MC=10% Fines=21% 120. Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 12.0 feet. o i 0 0 vi Z 0 a N N O n� F m W Ll • Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-14 Firth 2603151st PI.NE • su 11.1116 n. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CLIENT CC Edwards Construction Co.,Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 385' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION —• LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Death of Topsoil&Sod 4":field grass AFTER EXCAVATION -- ^ m y g P TESTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION t`isBrown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist -becomes gray - - MC=9% SM '•': -dense 5 : . MC=10% ..,' - _ 8.0 Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 8.0 feet. r a iI . Earth Solutions NW,LLC • TEST PIT NUMBER TP-15 Li rth' 2603151st PI.NE Solution. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF I Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 395' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 3":field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — W a. °C rA 0 ±r J TESTS N MATERIAL DESCRIPTION • • 0 Brown silty SAND,medium dense,moist -trace gravel MC=8%- Fines=15% -dense -slightly cemented - 5 `•`• '- SM MC=8% 10 10.0 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 10.0 feet. • ca YI O WSJ ai 2 • IEarth Solutions NW,LLC • f.t r-th 2603151st PI.NE TEST PIT NUMBER TP—f 6 Milutun Redmond,WA98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 ti11, Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 • • CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co.,Inc. PROJECT NAPE East Park • PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 6/8/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 405' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4":field crass AFTER EXCAVATION — Vtl oggTESTS O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist • • -decrease in gravel content MC=11% Fines=17% ' -dense - _ ;• -becomes gray • 5 fi - - SM - - 10 MC=9% •12.0 Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered dunng excavation. Bottom of test pit at 12.0 feet. ry� 3 � 7 F- C7 h JO 1J aS m tL 0 rth Earth Solutions NW,LLC 2603 151st Pl.NE TEST PIT NUMBER TP-17 i+l�uutuin;. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF t %III,' Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co.,Inc. • PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washincton DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 400' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Death of Topsoil&Sod 4•:field crass • AFTER EXCAVATION — V •i TESTS ai O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 Brown silty tY SAND with gravel,loose to medium dense,moist(Fill), SM •.•❖.; Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist - - MC=14% -dense _ _ -slightly cemented 5 SM 10 10.5 -decrease In sift content Brown py graded SAND with sit,dense,moist SP- MC=8% SM 12.0 Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 12.0 feet. • ii J • t T , • , Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PST NUMBER TP-18 t:rrllt 2803 151stst PI.I.NE 414)1111'111 n. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 VW i( ; Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park • PROJECT NUMBER 0125 - PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9105 GROUND ELEVATION 390' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4":field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — r W r tW N o a? TESTS 0a?t5 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION O Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist 1 SM 3.5 MC=12% Gray poorly graded fine to medium SAND with silt,medium dense,moist Fines=10% 5 • SP • - . SM ' • • • MC=14% • 10 10.0 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 10.0 feet. 1 g r 0 • M1 F7 Z a 0 Ili N 5 0 i x CO g Z W 0 4 - I Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-19, FA rill 2603 151st Pl.NE 111114)n, Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE I OF 1 %."'" Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton.Washington • DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 380' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT'TIME OF EXCAVATION LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod er:field area AFTER EXCAVATION — ui 'gm Ea te TESTS 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 Brown silty SAND,loose,moist(Fill) - - SM z_ ••.• Brown silty SAND,medium dense,moist :' ••*.• ••••• .• . 5 MC=15% •• .• . . • - SM •.;•• . . - - •.••• .11::• .•:. -becomes gray MC=12% . . 10 Fines=15% •••••:::10.0 Test pit terminated at 10.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 10.0 feet. • a tfi 1 t • Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-20 • td lit! 2803 151st PI.NE Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 " Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUNDELEVATION 366 TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Assodates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT ME OF EXCAVATION — • LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod r:field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — tujwIr TESTS 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 2 z z 0 4 Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist(Fill) SM t:. -trace debris •••••.%. 2.5 Gray silty SAND,medium dense,moist MC=14% -trace gravel Fines=30% 5 SM 1.0 -dense Gray SILT,dense,moist 10 MC=24% 11.0 Test pit terminated at 11.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 11.0 feet. z 11J Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-21 Ist rip 2603 151st Pl.NE • '14 3 I LI 1 IP ti Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 Wt1' Telephone: 4252843300 Fax 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 6/W05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 350' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 6":field grass AFTER EXCAVATION — tu • 0 TESTS cal g MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o. g z 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,loose to medium dense,moist(Fill) •- SM -occasional rubble .:1;:;:•-•2.5 - Brown silty SAND,medium dense,moist •••• - MC=14% SM 5 6.5 MC=7% Brown poorly graded SAND,medium dense,moist Fines=I 4% SP )11 10 MC=5% 12.0 Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered during excavation. Bottom of test pit at 12.0 feet. co t. t • .. �. Earth Solutions NW.LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-22 rill, 2603151st Pi.NE • •S4)1"1"i n. Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1 H Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co.,Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 6/9/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 260' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — NOTES Depth of Topsoil 8 Sod 4":field areas AFTER EXCAVATION — rW us U m C J TESTS t)! MATERIAL DESCRIPTION •0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist r • :• f: • - : •. 5 • ••�'• MC=14% SM • r' • ▪ • MC=9% r Fines=15% 1 ,: 0 • MC=10% ion Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered dunng excavation. Bottom of test pit at 12.0 feet. •vi a m C7 • Earth Solutions NW,LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-23 Li r1 h 2603 151st Pi.NE 'Solution, Redmond,WA 98052 PAGE 1 OF 1• h14' Telephone: 4252843300 Fax: 4252842855 CUENT CC Edwards Construction Co..Inc. PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER 0125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton,Washington DATE STARTED 619/05 COMPLETED 6/9/05 GROUND ELEVATION 295' TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR RV Associates GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION — LOGGED BY SSR CHECKED BY SSR AT END OF EXCAVATION — • NOTES Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4":field crass AFTER EXCAVATION • — w ~ °� TESTS w E; a 1 O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 0 Brown silty SAND with gravel,medium dense,moist r - r, MC 6% SM 5 -dense,becomes gray �:• • - x:;6.0 Gray poorly graded SAND with silt,medium dense,moist - 10 SP- ' SM - - MC=5% 12.0 - Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade.No groundwater encountered dunng excavation. Bottom of test pit at 12.0 feet. . c CI VJ Z d • a� F Y m qJ W Z W .Y • APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ES-0125 • • Earth Solutions NW,LLC A .) • Lint] Earth Solutions NW,LLC GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION . 2603 151st Place N.E. LI int] Redmond,WA 98052 VIA Ili Telephone: (425)284-3300 . Fax: (425)284-2855 CLIENT C.C.Edwards PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER ES-125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton U.S.SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S.SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1 • .1/23/8 3 4 6 810 1416 20 30 40 50 80 100 ii ®\8a 100 1 IlI , l IY 1 I I Ilii_I _ 95 90 IIR�IIIIIn�; �!IIII 1111111/ 1111111 IOU .. 85 111111111111111 1 IIIc 'iO11111111 IIIIIO 11111 II 8011I1111III1111I�!!IIII\'III111111 II1III llhI1IIS • z 1111 111111 11111111 ElIlIJOIlIlI 11I1111111. IIIIIIIiIII 01111 11111 II I Ill 1111111 IIii1I 11��IIl111� 11111/1/ IIII111 � IIII1111 11111 ill ' ill1 111Ill 35 30 IIIIFI 251111 I �, 20 II a wNI!l 15 I .I. . 10 • 5 • 0 I 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY coarse fine coarse medium fine Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu e TP-2 2.0ft. Brown silty SAND,SM i ® TP-6 4.0ft. Gray silty SAND,SM 8n TP-8 4.0ft. Gray silty SAND, SM 3 * TP-10 5.0ft. Gray silty SAND,SM 2 (Di TP-13 3.0ft. Specimen Identification 0100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay eis s TP-2 2.0ft. 19 0.405 0.134 13.4 65.4 21.2 TP-6 4.0ft. 19 0.446 0.166 11.7 70.6 17.7 A TP-8 4.0ft. 19 0.525 0.164 12.7 70.4 16.8 _ * TP-10 5.0ft. 19 0.517 0.127 13.2 70.9 15.9 - ti 0 TP-13 3.0ft. 37.5 0.746 0.188 _ 22.6 62.4 15.0 f -, 3 Z— ko ; Earth 2603 15 stiPlace N.E.LC GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION • x)+1�1/full' Redmond,WA 98052 'r I'• Telephone: (425)2844300 Fax: (425)284-2855 CUENT C.C.Edwards PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER ES-125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton U.S.SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S.SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1 5 1 112: 3 6 810 1416 20 30.40 .50 60 100 140 200 100 I I ---- 4 iii I • 'r1,1%1 T I I 95 11111%111 185 • . • ,� ' iILIUJii I • t2 60 I1ih'iII_m 55 `11111.11I III z50 - . . _ ! NN z45 • cc 40 W a 35 30 , -_ . 11111111.i . 251 : Ilk 1:1 - MEI 20 5 I . IlIlill � � 10 � ' liii— uii i 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I COBBLES GRAVEL SAND coarse I fine i coarse I medium I fine I SILT OR CLAY Specimen identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu •� TP-13 12.0ft. Gray silty SAND,SM § m TP-15 3.01t. Gray silty SAND, SM 0. 6 7. TP-16 3.Oft. Gray silty SAND,SM 3 * TP-18 4.0ft. Gray poorly graded SAND with silt,SP-SM O TP-19 10.Oft. 1.43 3.36 Gray silty SAND, SM a Specimen Identification D100 D60 030 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Cla �, • TP-13 12.Oft. 19 0.321 0.151 Y 6.5 72.5 21.0 1 TP-15 3.0ft. 19 0.505 0.18 11.1 74.2 • N 14.7 W s TP-16 3.Oft. 37.5 1.53 0.195 25.5 57.4 z TP-18 4.Oft. 4.75 0.25 0.16317.1 0 TP-19 10.Oft. 9.5 0.342 0.185 0.0 89.8 10.2. _ 0.4 84.4 15.2 `" 0 Y ' .r t:ertt1 Earth Solutions NW,LLC GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION 2603 151st Place N.E. idritiolil Redmond,WA 98052 MI'"' Telephone: (425)284-3300 • Fax: (425)284-2855 CLIENT C.C. Edwards PROJECT NAME East Park PROJECT NUMBER ES-125 PROJECT LOCATION Bremerton _ U.S.SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S.SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 8 4 3 2 ' 1 1/23/8 3 4 8 810 1418 20 30 40 50 80 100 140 200 100 I i I I 1 1 i F. l I r i' . 95 - .. _ 85 \ 1 T .... . 1 • 80 • • 70 . I- 65 ' r �wu 60 - - _ m55 r • I , __ •z z z 45 , \ ' w a 40 - . w a _ \\12,,.....,ir__ 35 — -, - - 30 . 25 , - , 20. "I I i • 10 5 0 . 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY coarse I fine coarse I medium I fine Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu � o TP-20 4.Oft. , Gray silty SAND,SM F.' MI TP-21 7.0ft. Brown poorly graded SAND,SP 0.67 4.85 8 A TP-22 9.Oft. Gray silty SAND,SM 3 * TP-24 5.0ft. Gray silty SAND,SM fn m g Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay • * TP-20 4.0ft. 37.5 0.299 0.077 13.8 56.7 29.5 ® TP-21 7.0ft. 19 0.815 0.303 0.168 7.6 88.5 4.0 W 4 TP-22 9.0ft. 19 0.485 0.183 13.0 72.3 14.7 N * TP-24 5.0ft. 19 0.344 0.154 8.5 74.1 17.4 � ! A • • • REPORT DISTRIBUTION ES-0125 1 Copy East Park, LLC 1601 — 114th Avenue Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98004 Attn: Mr. Jack Willing 2 Copies C.C. Edwards Construction Company, Inc. P.O. Box 1600 Orting, Washington 98360 Attn. Mr. Jim Holland 1 Copy West Sound Engineering, Inc. 217 Wilkins Drive Southwest Port Orchard, Washington 98366 Attn. Mr. Craig Baldwin Earth Solutions NW,LLC A .4.!...... 1 . .` ' ..:,'., • ^,.•.:•,,••:,.1 --?., -, . 1 ;,"I,. '- : , '".., A.i.•°:-'44,,t-,,A:1,-A k . i'. • „-.,...,-„..,,; ,,...,„„,..„.., _ . : .,.,_,,.. .. ,44-.•••• • • 1 • ' ,• ...2,,, . 0"Jr4":"'.'• . . 1 .. _ • ;./:..',..,.:. .. , .. . ., ...• f '.1,- , - .'! , ! • ,;4114' :/.1*.z.":4`.::f'' ' '. fr.--7-...,-V - -..,-.5„,.., • ,•-:,:„ 1..,,,,,„:„.. ,,...,,,,,... . . . '"4'.'-' !'•-'-'..-...1;6,4.. .,i-4,5" : •- a ..,..;,..,••:,",•,'41, , -,,,-,,,-•:-,4e,.:P;i:..!!;!'..11.'.:- • . .1 • ..;‘-,-.. ..-'!'1.-il:.;e . 4.,. • •,,,,,, - ' .-. '. 1 •J7,4 ,A.if 1;IP.'.:-.- :- . AT EARTH SOLUTIONS NW .. 1,- ., , ,,..,,.„ . „,,,,...., . ......,„,,,„:„...... _. .. • • 'eY' -*, ,',..,.. '" cr r`I''''V‘..." •' . - OUR MISSION Is TO ... •''.,•,-.0" . ',',;,..::;Ct('-"z*:'.. -' . '' • . .• ; HONOR OUR.COMMITMENTS '"--"4.b-y;'- ',' . , PROVIDE INNOVATIVE • • • : .,=.1010 .. • _A\ , . SOLUTIONS THAT CREATE I1 .- '.'`41:. , ,,,,),,;:',4),'• • . - • l' ''':'''-*Ar -aP.;.7..:„....* VALUE 1 !,w,1,01'; ,•., _ • ' ..-• ..-- ' , • .. 1... „ • ;• -'''' RECOGNIZE THAT OUR. i• •., :T. i':.'''-',••Zi:'1:,.7,,,.;,:,i. 1111 r ; '- ,,,:i:W1 4•4.0::4R:-'•'• . POWER AND EFFECTIVENESS - , . .! ' ... i_ .114,, i. 1,- -• . , • ' ., - 'l ' ! -",.-lit'Z'. ;I'•',.;.! . ,• . - . LIES WITH OUR PEOPLE ! , .!.,.. 1.,•;-.•!,,...,,, f_'i,•.....V-_,...,...:2:,•,' -- " . ''!•!:.;::'.4''''*.'":J!4,,t5 f.-...,!...:* ... ; ' \\(-7 TREAT ALL. FAIRLY AND 1.P. III , HONESTLY , --. - .,*. .. .-..., . ' .• . ' : •' • : ',''•. „A...4,-,.. , • aDEDICATE OURSELVES TO 0 k\ II .' • '`,'ei 1 1 4t;k{•,t,,..,r,;,.4:,,:1,4,4th, BRINGING OUT THE BEST IN .. , .•'' 1,..-IF•7p 4 latat,. .., ..,1,..,...4„.„:,e'./..17041:11wl%'. • EVERYONE 11 •• --s.,.4.,.,teri.,:.,. - -- .:,,!'"..,,,-;,-, _ • . • ,.. •:,..-,ji.A1,',!ii&A. • -- ' • i.--.0 ,--- .....•-,..:4.,.-.. X MAINTAIN AN ATMOSPHERE ' :.''.144"-:;-•; i1 4,-.' '. . , ,,...' •;,_ :.;;;i.v; 27:tfire,,e,4: ' . OF PROFESSIONAL, FRIENDLY , • • ;')- i.,.." ,!,,'_/-ei.-' - 111 'CUSTOMER RELATIONS . .,.-•,-..,..,,Jh'',,,t5lr''. . . .-'2. CONTINUE TO SEEK e•-•'...) ;"',21,.'? ‘4g)1*"., ,-• OPPORTUNITIES FOR I -. -•'-!':,.!',.'1 .,.4....„,. ' . , LEARNING AND GROWTH 1 '.....'',...! ,,.-',1•?.':•...,. 1 • -,•„..,,4t!„,r ' . -- ,40:-.,,:•-• • ,,- MAINTAIN A CLEAN, . ,1, .;'t.6.1.2%';...:,• , i II ' -4A litIC'fa'!--3-,-: ,• • WELL ORGANIZED WORK • . ..-•,z::::::.,,,,t',....•...-;:- ! .....,:71%a;"-•--, li',-; • • • ,. ,:-..-;..-4,!•!---;•••,: ., ,•••. • ENVIRONMENT • '.;•''.:4-#1'1,-;1-, ';', .• IMPLEMENT • J r q'f$:..ilyys..,;' -• ''' .)•- ICONSISTENT, 1 1111 RELIABLE ACCOUNTING .. •;* ',';i:7';'..--1,,ei;,-;, .;- . PROCEDURES - '- ' -..:;'-•''' '-f.1•',.1, : • • II BE A RESOURCE TO THE - .• .-.-:::'. %' cf41,•• 4.""i' ,- • ., .... ,,,, .,,.4,-... 1 :, ' COMMUNITY 111 ' • ••••'.' I ,-:, ; • -, : ,, ''- .:::4;'.-•,54-.Pi?.?:::,,.. . . ' •-:, -- '"r:-.:•;„:::-,:-.:'Y.-;i7:::.-,'.- • '•-1 ••-:.•,-' -:41:•,-t;. ...?;.* .1'.••-• • el13.:,,0.,,t-,,:r STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE HIGHMARK HOMES RESIDENTIAL PROJECT , Plan G-1033 March 14, 2014 . 4 ,01 EAPv, " JASly ° r I I,firiaffil Pirill" 7:*. - , - , lEgM1174 4,1'I! �' ,r #,��`O,l;�-_�:- MAR 2 6 2014 . _ tel. %, RAL- po i r City of Bremerton, DCD Job No. : 14-023 Location: Lot 50, East Park Bremerton, Washington SEGA Engineers/ /Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers 22939 SE 292"d PL (360)886-1017 Black Diamond,WA 98010 Copyright 2014,SEGA Engineers STATEMENT OF WORK SEGA Engineers was asked to provide a lateral loads analysis, shearwall design, review of major framing members and foundation, and drawing red-lines for a two-story wood framed residential garage with apartment. The roof framing is manufactured trusses, the floor framing is 2x dimensional:or.wood I-joists, and the foundation is typical concrete strip footings with a slab on grade.' The application and use of these calculations is limited to a single site referenced on the cover sheet. The cover sheet should have an original signature in blue ink over,the seal. The attached calculations may or,may not apply to other sites and the contractor assumes all responsibility and liability for sites not expressly reviewed and approved: Please contact SEGA Engineers for use at other sites. SEGA Engineers will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under. . similar circumstances by members of the engineering profession in this local. No other warranty', either expressed or implied is made.in connection with our rending of professional services. For any dispute, claim, or action arising out,of this design, SEGA Engineers shall have liability limited to the amount of the total fee received by SEGA Engineers. Questions regarding the attached should be addressed to SEGA Engineers. Greg Thesenvitz, PE/SE SEGA Engineers. SEGA Engineers' `Project G-1033 / Structural Civil Consulting.Engineers ,. Job No. 14-023 By: GAT 22939 SE 292nd PL (360)886-1017 Black Diamond, WA 98010 . Checked Date: 03/14/14 Sht i Design Criteria International.Building Code (IBC), 2012 LOADS Roof DL 15 psf LL 30 psf Floor DL 10 psf LL 40. psf Wind Risk Category II " Design Wind Speed 110 mph. (Vu,t) KZt 1.00 Exposure B Seismic Design Category . D SDS , 1.00 Response Factor 6.5 Cs= 0.154 Importance Factor 1.00 Soil Allowable Bearing 1,500 psf SEGA Engineers; Project G-1033 / Structural&Civil Consulting Engineers Job No. 14-023 By: GAT 22939 SE 292nd PL. (360)886-1017 Black Diamond,WA 98010 Checked - Date: 03/14/14 Sht 1 LOADS ROOF DL . . . Roofing(Comp) .3.5 psf OSB 1.8 2x@24 3.5 Insulation 1.1 /8" GWB 2.8 Misc. 1.5 14.2 psf LL Snow, Pf 30 psf (115% Load Duration) Reduction, Cs 0.00 (Ct= 1.1, other surfaces) 5/12 pitch =23 deg Total Roof Load 44.2 psf FLOOR DL Flooring 0.5 psf 3/4' Plywood 2:3 . 2x10@16"oc 2.8 5/8.,GWB . 2.8 Misc. 1.5 9.9 psf LL . . Residential 40 psf Total Floor Load 49.9 psf DECKS . DL .2 x Decking 4.3 psf • • 2x10@16" oc 2.8 Misc - 1.5. 8.6 LL . Residential 40 psf . . Total Deck Load 48.6 psf WALLS DL Siding 3.5 1/2" Plywood 1.5.psf 2x6@16"oc 1:7 Insul 0.6 1/2" GWB 2.2 9.5 psf Copyright 2014,SEGA Engineers. SEGA Engineers / PROJECT / Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers -'3' JOB NO. ' FIGURED BY CI 41'- 22939 SE,292nd Place Black Diamond, Washington 98010 43 (360) 886-1017 CHECKED BY DATE FtiN SHEET Z OF rr1 N C._ "l 1)?.l:J?--- ti aax ! 1 1dip,Z � ©, N. CIA.2 4 �►� • (moo sr � c-�Ns�-n (Ar- C` z�(so t)00 _ r Iip •)-z S -:-.., a ),. si,c, his,-T. st 1 )4 3)7„i iri4 , a,4S C 024e 1`1Pf)(6)3" 'Z_ ,s-k!u3 ,k,ti'' eth- .. . . 1174- N Sg..- 3 97-,12.. - +Z r,F,r, -` Copyright 2014,SEGA Engineers SEGA Engineers Project G-1033 Structural&Civil Consulting Engineers . Job No. "14-023 By: GAT 22939 SE 292nd PL (360)886-1017 Black Diamond,WA 98010 Checked _ Date: 03/14/14 ..Sht. - LATERAL LOADS - (Alternate ASD) SEISMIC Maximum Base Shear, V= F Sps W Eq. 12.14-11 where, F= 1.1 Two-Story Building Sos = 1.00 ' ' Ss = 1.5 Fa = 1.00 (Table 11.4-1, Ss> 1:25) R= 6.5 Table 12.14-1 W= Seismic Weight For W: Wroor ( 38 ft) ( 26 ft) (16 psf)+ ( 2 ) ( 38ft+. '26ft) (4.0ft) (9.5psf) = 21 kips Wfloor=. ( 38 ft) ( 26 ft) (14 psf) + ( 2 ) ( 38 ft+ 24ft) '.( 8.5 ft) ( 9.5 psf) = 24 kips- "(total = 45 kips. Design Base Shear,'V= . ( .169) (45 kip ) = 7.5 kip E = 7.5 kip = 5.4 kip 1.4 WIND . Design Wind Pressure,ps=X Kn Ps3o Eq. 28.6-1, Sect.28.6.3 where, X = 1.00 0- 15 ft Exposure B Figure 28.6-1 = 1.00 20 ft 1.00 25 ft Ke= 1.00 Section 26.8 P30 =17.7 psf 110 mph Figure 28.6-1 (ASD) P0-15= ( 1.00) ( 1.00 ) (17.7 psf) = 17.70 psf (x 0.6= 10.62 psf) P20 = ( 1.00 ) ( 1.00 ) (17.7 psf) _ 17.70 psf . ' (x 0.6= 10.62 psf) P25 = ( 1.00) ( 1.00) (17.7 psf) = 17.70 psf. (.x 0.6= 10.62 psf) Design Base Shear: (Wind) Vfb= ( 38 ft) ( 10 ft) (17.7 psf) + (38 ft) '( 5ft) (17.7 psf) + ( 38 ft). ( 5ft) (17.7 psf) =13.5 x 0.6 = 8.1 kips Vs's= (24ft) ( 10ft) (17.7 psf) + (26ft) . (5ft) (17.7 psf) + ( 20ft) ( 5ft) (17.7 psf). 8.3 x 0.6 = 5.0 kips Therefore, Wind Loads Govern for Lateral Design -Front/Back Seismic Loads Govern for Lateral Design-Side/Side Copyright 2014,SEGA Engineers SEGA Engineers g� exS j Project .,. G-1033 Structural&Civil Consulting Engineers Job No. 14-023 By: GAT 22939 SE 292nd PL (360)886-1017 .` Black Diamond,WA 98010 Checked Date: 03/14/14 Sht. LATERAL LOADS (cont'd) Distribute Seismic Loads Over Height Maximum Base Shear, V 5.4 k Fx = wX V (Eq. 12.14-12) Froof= ( 20.7 ) ( 5.4 k) = 2.5 kip (44.5 ) Ffloor= (23.8) ( 5.4 k) _, 2.9 kip (44.5) F,�= 5.4 kip Copyright 2014,SEGA Engineers SEGA Engineers PROJECT _ 33 / Structural & CivilConsultingEngineers �� JOB NO '4 .-O Z FIGURED BY 7 22939 SE 292nd Place Black Diamond,Washington 98010 3J CHECKED BY DATE ig/ l SHEET 5OF (360) 886-1017 �`� SHS \ bfAi Sia \ / / r't) 014# ' Z,o 4 C a�-�Go�LP /&P, -4P put a it PooIv . Alzhoo pip Z14) 14 � L-r 'Jr ,oz�8 nL .,..� 0.1° 01.3ti c. Z7 YLir 1.11-L LS'r1106 Copyright 2014,SEGA Engineers SEGA EngineersPROJECT G� 0 3 3 / Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers, JOB NO. 1 i!02 3 : FIGURED BY 6714./- 22939 22939 SE 292nd Place Black Diamond,Washington 98010 CHECKED BYDATE°1//4 f 4.SHEET �DOF (360) 886-1017 ' SvJ VIIIA- )1-City-AJ __-S e \li/i C 113, L 2 , J.- ....1 1 , 1 - - --it of ;-. / 2 sc)/ ••4 sl-%7 - ff-viPtIP Dc-,010 7—. V4_ )0Zs. f- _ ". 7-.1_ %, . 1 )'. 3f.'''' . t1 3$' 7_ z)--1,Ec �3g 7 1> 11p lin -CY)ff--)\-'(L- \Aili-PL 4" 1- t, - ills. , r 6 L,-: t$0 ,-............i.pvl iz- 3.4- 81-t -s' -= i4F1 . 04 iAllikkb. {i 7- 1, 7--oti,4,, t. tzcItx-it El �' v� V �n err Vp Z,1S li /1 ' '' / ii-liC frk S/il• 1-/ •Ct, X It -44 -.Z211/60 i C 4. -stfi-g i):> t ., , t ' .-.-k, Copyright 2014,SEGA Engineers S E G A Engineers, PROJECT - 033 /Structural Se Civil Consulting-Engineers • Q 22939 SE 292nd Place •• Black Diamond, Washington 98010 JOB NO. 14.-023 FIGURED BY •CHAT • • (360) 888-1017•FAX 886-1016 - • CHECKED BY DATE 03/14/14 SHEET 1. OF• 1 • SHEAR WALL KEY PLAN • • • • • • • , • ,� • • • UPPER FLOOR A=948SQFT • •TND-BEAM LDTA30-VAR 161LL WAND••NOR 1 - O TOP PLATE . TO 3x BLOCKM. TO 3x BLOCKM (TTP:7 PLACED) - (TTP,7 PLACED) • - . • • • • IN FLOG' - 196 sQ Fr • • _ 1 _ LDTA74-BENT t0 top PLATE ♦ - O 'maw mow ■ ■` • C ` •• ns L C as ° ° . m -c a) O u) ° us ami � ' a) E w ' L c _c .� °c 10 3• C N . L CNI . O. mm � a) a) c al . m • .4 o y • -- ca o N a) a) CO Ir N 7 O N L. N a.) a) E C N. N N 0 C O tZ a nm ~ (a � • m 0E- o • (6. a) a) . 0 .4 x5 '- 2 ° o o - 0 E o • o' a) C o ° v ' 6 .L m .. .° E �. o a) u) Q-' a) •- • . -a . ci .� (4 . c : . vi �cl � � Z 'ea N ° �a a) o ° . 2 • m c) L E a)c1 2 •c "' c ( N c . ' s E .•a m O C 'a). L C = O u) "0 _Q). (B . •� .E w v U L CD ° ,C E LW. -a 0.) O L Cr) a) a) D E o) <o o -^ •c .. •E N N a0i 0 ai — © , Ll— v a) ° a a`) w C Z O ` - -N o L _a. a) a. 2 u) J E ° 0C -0 0 .3 = a) o C 5 � W 30 .E -°a a) E o � • • W Z • • 4c•` i { r^.Yt4ex 1iFin1 : aViaa eAPA rti, .a. I TT 100E �. k ... APRIL 2014 A Portal Frame with Hold Downs for Engineered Applications The APA portal-frame design,as shown in Figure 1,was envisioned primarily for use as bracing in conventional light- frame construction.However,it can also be used in engineered applications,as described in this technical topic.The portal frame is not actually a narrow shear wall because it transfers shear by means of a semi-rigid,moment-resisting frame.The extended header is integral in the function of the portal frame,thus,the effective frame width is more than just the wall segment,but includes the header length that extends beyond the wall segment. For this shear transfer mechanism,the wall aspect ratio requirements of the code do not apply to the wall segment of the APA portal frame. Cyclic testing has been conducted on the APA portal-frame design(APA 2012).Recommended design values for engi- neered use of the portal frames'are provided in Table 1. Design values are derived from the cyclic test data using a rational procedure that considers both strength and stiffness. • The Table 1 values in this report were developed using the CUREE cyclic test protocol(ASTM E2126);using a flexible load head.Earlier testing was conducted using rigid load heads and the sequential phased displacement(SPD)method, as outlined in SEAOSC(1997)Standard Method of Cyclic(Reversed)Test for Shear Resistance of Framed Walls for Buildings. The design values in Table 1 ensure that the code(IBC)drift limit and an adequate safety factor are maintained. For seismic design,APA recommends using the design coefficients and factors for light-frame(wood)walls sheathed with wood structural panels rated for shear resistance(Item 15 of Table 12.2-:L of ASCE 7-10). See APA Report T2004-59 for more details. For designs where deflection may be less of a design consideration,for example,wind loading while the portal frames are used in tandem with each other,and not used as conventional shear walls,a load factor of 2.5, based on the cyclic test results is used. Since cyclic testing was conducted with the portal frame attached to a rigid test frame using embedded strap-type • hold downs,design values provided in Table 1 of this document should be limited to portal frames constructed on similar rigid-base foundations,such as a concrete foundation,stem wall or slab,arid using a similar embedded strap- type hold down. • • 1 ©2014 APA—The Engineered Wood Association t • (. Table 1. Recommended Allowable Design Values for APA Portal Frame Used on a Rigid-Base Foundation for Wind or Seismic Loading(e,b,e,d) Minimum Width Maximum Height Allowable Design(ASD)Values per Frame Segment (in.) (ft) Shears"-fl(lbf) Deflection(in.) Load Factor 8 850 0.33 3.09 16 10 625 0.44 2.97 8 1,675 0.38 2.88 . 24 10 1,125 0.51 3.42 (a) Design values are based on the use of Douglas-fir or Southern pine framing.For other species of framing,multiply the above shear design value by the specific gravity adjustment factor=(1-(0.5-SG)),where SG=specific gravity of the actual framing.This adjustment shall not be greater than 1.0. (b) For construction as shown in Figure 1 (c) Values are for a single portal-frame segment(one vertical leg and a portion of the header).For multiple portal-frame segments,the allowable shear design values are permitted to be multiplied by the number of frame segments(e.g.,two=2x,three=3x,etc.). (d) Interpolation of design values for heights between 8 and 10 feet,and for portal widths between 16 and 24 inches,is permitted. (e) The allowable shear design value is permitted to be multiplied by a factor of 1.4 for wind design. (f) If story drift is not a design consideration,the tabulated design shear values are permitted to be multiplied by a factor of 1.15.This factor is permitted to be used cumulatively with the wind-design adjustment factor in Footnote(e)above. Figure 1. Construction Details for APA Portal-Frame Design with Hold Downs FRONT ELEVATION SECTION Extent of header with double portal frames(two'braced wall panels) • Extent of header with single portal frame lone braced wall panels) ' . - - Header to jack-stud strap 2'to 18'rough width of opening I per wind design min 1000 lbf for single or double portal on both sides of opening T • - ( • _ opposite side of sheathing Pony } re_. ') ...... .-. I � 4 I height �, Mm 3 x 11-14'net header •s ,� :. Fasten top plate to header with two rows of 16d t � steel header;not allowed .,5:'''i 4' ii 'sinker hails at 3"o.c.typ 74 Ct, `—Fasten sheathing to header with 8d common or ,� 12' galvanized box nails at 3"grid pattern as'shown Min.318"wood structural Max , panel sheathing total oil1.f. .—Header to jack-stud strap per wind design. wall Min 1000 Ibf on both sides of opening height P 9 opposite side of sheathing. " If needed,panel splice edges f shall occur over and be 10' .Min.double.2x4 framing covered with min 3/8" ii, nailed to common blocking • max thick wood structural panel sheathing with f•o I• within middle 24"of portal height 8d common''or galvanized box nails at 3"o.c. height.One row of 3"o.c. in all framing(studs,blocking,'and sills)typ. nailing is required in;each j" panel edge. 1. Min length ofpanel � 9 per table 1 I Typical portal frame '7-.._Mm(2)3500 lb strap-type hold-downs \\ .j a construction • (embedded into concrete and nailed into framin ' 9), Min double 2x4 post(king and jack stud).Number of • Min reinforcing of foundation,one#4 bar 4" , jack studs per IRC tables ,a# ;4 top and bottom of footing.Lap bars 15"min. �' - R502.5(1)$(2). Min footing size under opening is 12"x 12".A turned-down \ slab shall be permitted at door'openings. device(embedded 1000lb hold-down into • \--Min(1)'5/8"diameter anchor bolt installed per IRC R403.1.6- concrete and nailed with 2"x 2"x 3/1e'plate washer into gaming) • i 2 ©2014 APA-The Engineered Wood Association A • ( References • APA,' 2004, Confirmation of Seismic Design Coefficients for the APA Portal Frame, APA Report T2004-59, APA—The Engineered Wood Association,Tacoma,WA. • APA,2012,Effect of Hold-Down Capacity on IRC Bracing Method PFH.and IBC Alternate Method,APA Report T2012L-24, APA—The Engineered Wood Association,Tacoma,WA. ASCE, 2010,Minimum Design Load for Buildings and Other Structures.ASCE 7. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston,VA. ASTM E2126-11,Standard Test Methods for Cyclic(Reversed)Load Test for Shear Resistance of Vertical Elements of the Lateral Force Resisting Systems for Buildings,ASTM International.West Conshohocken,PA. SEAOSC, 1997,Standard Method of Cyclic (Reversed) Test for Shear Resistance of Framed Walls for Buildings, Structural Engineers Association of Southern California.Whittier,CA. • • • • • • • • • • • • • We have field representatives in many major U.S.cities and in Canada who can help answer questions involving www dpdwoOdorg APA trademarked products.For additional assistance in specifying engineered wood products,contact us: APA HEADQUARTERS:70.11 So.19th St.•Tacoma,Washington 98466•(253)565-6600•Fax:(253)565-7265 APA PRODUCT SUPPORT HELP DESK:(253)620-7400•E-mail:help@apawood.org Form No.TT-100F Revised April 2014 DISCLAIMER:The information contained herein is based on APA-The Engineered Wood Association's continuing programs of laboratory testing,product research,and comprehensive field experience.Neither APA nor its members make any warranty, expressed or implied,or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the use, application of, and/or reference to opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations included in this publication. Consult your local jurisdiction or design professional to assure compliance with code, construction, and performance A P �i requirements.Because APA has no control over quality of workmanship or the conditions under which engineered , wood products are used,it cannot accept responsibility of product performance or designs as actually constructed. 3 ©2014 APA—The Engineered Wood Association 0 n....,,lita' ,, al 141-111W r?' i 1 % It: 4; ';-; `` � 424 STRAP - FAR SIDE 4 IL H.E7 ININA1jO H� (TYP. OF 2) d w/ Sol're 3I' O.C. EA WAY / 10' 16 / �l MINIMUM CONTINUOUS 2x TOP PLATE HDR -\\ VW; Llm ' fi �® HDR PER PLAN. EXTEND OVER PANEL. /-\ OVER (2) STUDS. 2 ri, . + „ ,. ',5,' H 1 FASTEN TOP PLATEFt, (3) 2x STUDS ..V TO HEADER w/ (2) . ROWS 16 d e 3" O.C. ' /- :; 4x BLOCKING 6 MIDDLE E724" IF REQUIRED. 10'-011 .. ♦ 4 . MAXIMUM 1/2" RATED SHEATHING (24/0 EXP I). .. .: NAIL w/ (2) ROWS 0c13" O.C. AT " PANEL EDGES. (2) 2x STUDS (2) 2x PLATE. (NAIL .. :: SHT'G TO EA PLATE) TOP OF STEM WALL :„--:;.,::..ii_; ; ^1+,--f-,,, ELEV. VARIES 2x PT SILL STHDI4 HOLDOWN U.NO. (2) 5i8"� ANCHOR BOLT w/ MIN. ��� EMBEDMENT 4 3" x 3" x �i4" r i Z ,fp„ ,. GALVANIZED R WASHER. ' o ,e /� k FOUNDATION PER PLAN. MIN. 8" THICK STEM WALL w/ ` / is -, #4 BAR HORIZ. TOP 4 BOTTOM. x 'ANL AL SEGA Engineers/ _I� s,,,ARK =0� 5 / =133 /Structural & Civil Consulting Engineers s1STF/ RKLOT 50 22939 SE 292nd Place • Black Diamond, Washington 98010 JOB: L_�� 0L/22/14 SK (360) 886-1017•FAX 886-1016 Valarie Jacobsen From: Allison Satter Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 12:54 PM To: Jeannie Vaughn;Valarie Jacobsen; Margret Mountjoy; Kelli Lambert;Curtis Hogenson Subject: FW: Carraige House in East Park FYI about East Park and Carriage House. From: Debra Purcell [mailto:debra@highmarkhomes.us] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:54 AM To: Allison Satter Cc: Kelli Lambert Subject: Re: Carraige House in East Park Yep, I was aware of that! Maybe one step ahead of you on this one dp :) Debra Purcell Land Acquisition and Development MTT Holdings,Inc. /Highmark Homes LLC 16400 Southcenter Parkway, Suite 210 Tukwila,WA 98188 360.551.2282 (cell) debranhighmarkhomes.us On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Allison Satter<Allison.Satternci.bremerton.wa.us> wrote: Deb, Another potential issue has popped up. Our Inspector was talking about doing the Final inspection soon on one house on Schley in East Park. However, it is one of those houses that has its only parking at carriage house. As the carriage house has not been built yet, this house does not have any parking, except street parking. As this home needs to have the off-street parking to comply with all requirements, the carriage house will have to be built prior to us giving a final inspection for lots 47 and 48 in East Park. So to reiterate: my inspector cannot sign off any homes for occupancy without their off-street parking established. 1 I am available today and all next week(minus lunch, and a couple meetings here and there), so if you want to talk to me about this, please give me a call. I have CCed Kelli Lambert, as she is our Planner who will be i eviewing all Residential permits, if you can't get in touch with me, she may be available (360-473-5245). Best, Senior Planner City of Bremerton 1345 6th Street Suite 600 I Bremerton, WA 98337 (360) 473-5845 Allison.Satter@ci.bremerton.wa.us • 2 j. MEMORANDUM CITY OF BREMERTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: FOR THE RECORD { FROM: JEANNIE VAUGHN, BUILDING OFFICIA SUBJECT: BB14 00156, CARRIAGE HOUSE DATE: JUNE 23, 2014 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................:.............................................................................................. The carriage house to be constructed at 2231 Schley Way, Lot 50, is proposed to have a residential dwelling unit above three car garages, one of which is dedicated to the residence and the other two dedicated to two other residences in the plat. As such, the carriage house does not fall under the purview of the International Residential Code (IRC) and was reviewed under the auspices of the 2012 International Building Code (IBC). The IBC calls for 1-hour fire-resistance rated exterior walls when the walls are located with fire separation distance of 10 feet or less. This differs from the IRC which has a fire separation distance of 5 feet. The carriage house as proposed has fire separation distance of 5 feet. • Although the IBC calls for fire-rated exterior walls, opening protection is not required. The only difference in the carriage house and the other single family dwellings in the plat is the two garage spaces that are designated for other residences. The garages are only required to be separated from the dwelling unit above by the same fire-resistance construction as found in the IRC, one layer of 5/8" Type X gypsum board or equivalent on the ceiling of the garage and 1/" gypsum board applied to supporting structures. The 2003 IBC had an exception 'b' in Table 602 which allowed Group R-3 and accessory structures under Section 101.2 to have.,exterior walls be non-rated at 3 feet or greater, with the intent that the structure was treated as an IRC structure, and was `equating' it to the IRC allowances at the time. Until 2009, the fire separation distance in the IRC was 3'. The 2006 IBC removed the footnote because of concerns of density in plats. However, with the 2009 IRC, the fire separation distance was increasedto 5' and the density in plats is less. The 2012 IRC now allows a decrease to 3' for fire separation distance when the residence is sprinklered. Although the IRC has changed to increase the fire separation distance, the footnote in IBC was not restored. The carriage house is intended to be occupied the same as any other single family residence, the structure is sprinklered, the fire separation between the Group U garages and the residence is the same as the IRC, and the only other carriage house in the plat was constructed under the same conditions. The provision of 1-hour exterior walls with no opening protection serves little purpose and is not an expectation of the public in this instance. • Jeannie Vaughn From: Jeff Walker <JWalker@iccsafe.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 7:27 AM To: Jeannie Vaughn Subject: RE: 12 IRC R302.6 & R101.1.2 (JW) Glad to hear you found more info—and please reply if I can be of any more assistance. Have a great week! JW From: Jeannie Vaughn [mailto:Jeannie.Vaughn@ci.bremerton.wa.us] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 3:28 PM To: Jeff Walker Subject: RE: 12 IRC R302.6 & R101.1.2 (JW) Thank you. I just found a 2006 Update document that talks about eliminating the footnote because of the concern of distance between houses in dense plats. It would have been nice to get the footnote back when the fire separation setback in the IRC was changed to 5'. This one structure in the whole plat will be the only one with 1-hour walls, although there's no restrictions on openings. The reasonableness in me wants to treat it the same as all the other residences in the plat and I'm very conflicted.. Jeannie Vaughn Building Official Department of Community Development City of Bremerton 345 6th St., Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337 (360) 473-5212, desk (360) 473-5278, fax Jeannie.vaughn@ci.bremerton.wa.us From: Jeff Walker [mailto:JWalker@iccsafe.orq] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 11:42 AM To: Jeannie Vaughn Subject: RE: 12 IRC R302.6 &R101.1.2 (JW) Importance: High Jeannie, Thanks for your reply. As to setbacks, I don't believe there is anything specific allowing Group R-3 to have a 'lesser' FSD than any other occupancy, as Table 602 notes that ALL types of'R' use groups have the same requirements. 1 The 2003 IBC had an exception 'b' in Table 602 which allowed Group R-3 and accessory structures under Section 101.2 to be non-rated at 3 feet or greater, but that was ultimately trying to convey that the structure was treated as an IRC structure, and was'equating' it to the IRC allowances at the time. Hope this helps—and thanks again for using our services. Sincerely, JW From: Jeannie Vaughn [mailto:Jeannie.Vaughn@ci.bremerton.wa.us] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 3:45 PM To: Jeff Walker Subject: RE: 12 IRC R302.6 &R101.1.2 (JW) I apologize, but I have a follow question that perhaps you can help. This carriage house is in a plat with 5' setbacks. I thought there was a code section that allowed Group R-3 to have 5' fire separation distance, but the only section I can find is IBC 705.2.3 for the projections, and Footnote f of Table 705.8 for openings. I'm not finding an exception to requiring 1-hour exterior walls for fire separation distance for R-3 in Table 602. Do you know if another section of the code covers the exterior wall of Group R-3 that is at least 5' from the property line? Jeannie Vaughn Building Official Department of Community Development City of Bremerton 345 6th St., Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337 (360) 473-5212, desk (360) 473-5278, fax Jeannie.vaughn@ci.bremerton.wa.us From: Jeff Walker [mailto:JWalker@iccsafe.org] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 5:29 AM To: Jeannie Vaughn Subject: RE: 12 IRC R302.6 & R101.1.2 (JW) Jeannie, You are welcome—and thanks for using the services of ICC. Sincerely, JW From: Jeannie Vaughn [mailto:Jeannie.Vaughn@ci.bremerton.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 5:53 PM To: Jeff Walker Subject: RE: 12 IRC R302.6 & R101:1.2 (JW) Thank you, Jeff. I suspected as much and appreciate the rewording of my questions. Jeannie Vaughn 2 ' . Building Official Department of Community Development City of Bremerton 345 6th St., Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337 (360) 473-5212, desk (360) 473-5278, fax J8Onniexooahn@cibnemerkon/wo.un _ From: Jeff Walker [nnaiUo:]VVa|kerOiccsafe.oro] Sent: ThursdayMay 01, 2014 2:37 PM To: Jeannie Vaughn; Lis Valdemarsen Subject: RE: 12 IRC R302.6 &R101.1.2 (JW) Importance: High May 1. 2014 RE: 2O12IRC Sections R3O2.8and R1U1.1.2 Ms. Vaughn, Thanks for submitting your code opinion questions to ICC. Your questions referenced Sections R302.6 and R101.1.2 of the 2012 IRO. and are paraphrased as follows: 01: Regarding a dwelling unit with a multiple bay garage below it, where some of the bays are serving other dwelling units: What would this arrangement be classified as? Al: Since there are multiple parties utilizing the structure, the arrangement described would be governed by the IBC as a mixed occupancy. Per Section 406.3.1 of the 2012 IBC, private garages of 1,000 square feet or less are allowed to be classified as Group LI. The dwelling unit above the Group U garage would be classified as Group R-3. Q2: Regarding a dwelling unit a multiple bay garage below it, where some of the bays are serving other dwelling units: What are the separation requirements between the 'other' garage bays and the dwelling unit? A2: Separation between a Group U 'private garage of 1,000 s.f. or less' (for ALL bays) and Group R-3 would be in accordance with the prescriptive requirements of Section 406.3.4 of the 2012 IBC. This is in lieu of the requirements for mixed occupancies in accordance with Section 508 ofthe 2O12 |BC. Q3: Regarding a dwelling unit with a multiple bay garage below it, whare some of the bays are serving other dwelling units: What are the separation requirements between the two 'other' garage bays? A3: There are no requirements for separation between multiple Group U occupancies; the only separation requirement is between the Group R-3 Dwelling Unit and the Group U area(s). Q4: Regarding a dwelling unit with a multiple bay garage below it, where some cif the bays are serving other dwelling units: What type(s) of NFPA sprinkler systems are allowed to serve the 'other' garage bays? A4: The Group R-3occupancy may use NFPA18. NFPA13R. orNFPA13D. If the Group R-3 occupancy is provided with an NFPA 13R sprinkler system, as allowed by Section 903.3.1.2, the Group U occupancy must be provided with sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13, per Section 7.3.2 of NFPA 13R (2010 Edition). If the Group R-3 occupancy is provided with an NFPA 13D sprinkler system, as allowed by Section 903.3.1,3, then the guuagevvou|dod|| naquiveeprink|eosoaforaNFPA13syabam. sinomthegansgeimnotacoeneory. butunctheroccupanoy within the structure. 3 • Code opinions issued by ICC staff are based on ICC published codes and do not include local, state or federal codes, policies or amendments. These opinions are based on the information which you have provided. We have made no independent effort to verify the accuracy of this information nor have we conducted a review beyond the scope of your questions. These opinions do not imply approval of an equivalency, specific product, specific design, or specific installation and cannot be published in any form implying such approval by the International Code Council. As these opinions are only advisory, the final decision is the responsibility of the designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of this code. Sincerely, Jeff H.Walker, P.E., C.B.O., M.C.P. Senior Staff Engineer Architectural & Engineering Services International Code Council The International Code Council(ICC)Plan Review Services staff of professionals is ready and available to serve your plan review needs. Please contact the ICC Plan Review Department at 1-888-ICCSAFE(422-7233)extension 33809,or visit the ICC website at: http://www.iccsafe.orq/cs/Paqes/PR-Consultinq.aspx From: Jeannie Vaughn [mailto:Jeannie.Vaughn@ ci.bremerton.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 11:57 AM To: Lis Valdemarsen; Jeff Walker Subject: RE: 12 IRC R302.6 & R101.1.2 (JW) Thank you. I realized after I sent the request that I forgot to ask about the type of fire sprinkler system to cover the two garages, but that may be a question out of NFPA 13b or NFPA R. Jeannie Vaughn Building Official Department of Community Development City of Bremerton 345 6th St., Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337 • (360) 473-5212, desk (360) 473-5278, fax Jeannie.vaughn@ci.bremerton.wa.us From: Lis Valdemarsen [mailto:Ivaldemarsen@ iccsafe.orq] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 9:36 AM To: Jeff Walker Cc: Jeannie Vaughn Subject: 12 IRC R302.6 & R101.1.2 (JW) Jeannie, I have forwarded your request to Jeff Walker. 4 • If you have any questions regarding the status of your reply to your code opinion question, please contact me by either phone or email. Sincerely, Lis Valdemarsen Senior Secretary International Code Council,Inc. Los Angeles District Office 5360 Workman Mill Rd Whittier,CA 90601-2298 Phone:(562)699-0541 exit 3201 Fax: (562)699-4522 Ivaldemarsen@iccsafe.orq www.iccsafe.orq Our usual response time is up to a week depending on the issues for email code opinions, Reminders are sent out once a week(7 days)from date engineer is assigned to keep us on track with items on the in box. For written(letter)request: Response time is up to 2 weeks(14 business days). Codes&Standards Forum: The Code Council has revisited how best to provide an online,professional Discussion Forum and area within the website that has a sense of community—where Members and nonmembers can provide input and exchange ideas with their peers in the industry.The new Codes&Standards Discussion Forum does just that, as it allows Registered Website Users and ICC Members to discuss the I-Codes in an online community. Note to Non-Members: If you join the ICC you can have access to important building safety information! Link: www.iccsafe.orq/ICCFORUMS Feed: Codes, Standards &Guidelines: Request Code Opinion Posted on: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 8:56 AM • Author: Jeannie Vaughn Subject: Jeannie Vaughn Requestor Full Name:Jeannie Vaughn Job Title: Building Official Phone Number: 360-473-5212 Requestor email address: ieannie.vaughn@ci.bremerton.wa.us Requestor Address: City of Bremerton Community Development 345 6th St, Ste 600 Bremerton, WA 98337 USA Code Reference: 2012 International Residential Code • Code Edition: 2012 IRC Code Section: R302.6 Dwelling/garage fire separation. Page 51 & R101.1.2 Scope, Page 1 Questions: A plat has two carriage houses in which a residence is constructed over three garages. One of the garages is intended for the residence, while the other two garages are intended for two other houses. All three residences are on separate lots with a separate owner and intended to be occupied as single family residences. 1. Since two of the garage spaces are not associated with the dwelling unit, does the structure fall under the scope of the IRC or the IBC? 2. How should the fire rated separation between the residence and the two non-accessory garages and the separation between the two non-accessory garages be treated? Status: New View article... Celebrate Building Safety Month in May to help raise awareness on the importance of safe, sustainable and resilient communities through effective use of the latest building safety codes. 5 • Celebrate Building Safety Month in May to help raise awareness on the importance of safe, sustainable and resilient communities through effective use of the latest building safety codes. Celebrate Building Safety Month in May to help raise awareness on the importance of safe, sustainable and resilient communities through effective use of the latest building safety codes. Celebrate Building Safety Month in May to help raise awareness on the importance of safe, sustainable and resilient communities through effective use of the latest building safety codes. Celebrate Building Safety Month in May to help raise awareness on the importance of safe, sustainable and resilient communities through effective use of the latest building safety codes. 6 Field Report EnviroSound Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Consulting .Project Name: The Ridge at East Park Job Number: ESC13-G014 /Client: Highmark Homes LLC Date: 7-15-13 Weather: Sunny Report Number: 32 Purpose of Visit: Observe Lot 17 Permit Number: Reviewed By: Shawn E. Williams, LG/LEG Arrived on site at 1600. A.representative of EnviroSound Consultants (EnviroSound) arrived on site as requested to observe Lot 17. Construction appeared to be completed at the time of the site visit and it is our opinion that no further geotechnical inspections are necessary on Lot 17. Departed site shortly after 1630. END OF REPORT I0 EnviroSound Consulting • 3388 Byron Street Ste 200 • Silverdale, WA 98383 360.698.5950 Fax 360.698.5929 ' I1 BUILDING PERMIT 2231 SCHLEY BLVD, LT 18 ' NEW SFR W/ATTACHED GAR & {' ' INSPECTION CARD DECK (BASIC BS12 00009) l ,f, i •PROTECT THIS CARD FROMTHE WEATHERt Ii r a Building Plumbing ei Mechanical a Alarm/Sprinkler 0 This Placard must be posted on or near building and the Permit & "Approved" plans must be at the site. Permit # B 12 00661 Y (44,i-,-,:',717, , ., , Call the following Agency Telephone Numbers for inspections: Property lines shall be properly identified and marked before foundation footing inspection.Setbacks are measured to the Building Department Inspections Call: (360)473-5870 • . finished wall structure. WATER-Public Works -Water: . (360)473-5927 -Reinspection fee may be assessed if inspection has been PW-Public Works -Engineering: (360)473-5270 requested when not ready or corrections are not completed. HEALTH -Kitsap Co. Health District: (360)337-5285 -Permit,approved plans,engineering,and inspection card shall Fire -Fire Department: (360)473-5386 be on site during construction or Reinspection Fee may be L&I - Dept. of Labor and Industry: (360)415-4000 assessed. Inspection Approved Date Notes Special Inspection -Geotechnical-Soils Compaction &Bearing y e 1 Send to Bldg Dept -ZZ y (�.J `... -s-a-13 Geotechnical report for retaining wall placement, Send report to Bldg Dept Geotechnical Report for Structural Fill and Compaction, Soil . Bearing Foundation Footings. Property lines shall be properly identified C,124,4 4.1'?-(3 Foundation Walls/Hold downs .-,?2, Geotechnical Engineer Final Letter, Send report to Bldg Dept "7'-24--c) Plumbing Groundwork Underfloor Framing Inspection/Anchor Bolts&Washers/Hold Downs M4i4 4-105 Shear Wall Panels/Braced Wall Panels eztAt 5,1--(3 Mechanical Rough-In yff��^^�JJ 6-244' Plumbing V2 4 Plumbing Rough-In 'aig465-1/2-12, "7 p t Gas Piping Pressure Test 6 6-(j.(' 3 04- L&I -Electrical Cover Inspection Before Framing (State of. Washington) c.�.e.._ .(43 FIRE-Fire Sprinkler/Fire Alarm Cover tf(.44-, F-3-0-13 Framing Inspection (Mechanical & Plumb Rough-In, Elect Cover �'�, ,�/}nV 6,(.2..../33 Completed) Insulation-Wall V« 6—I z-ja Sheetrock Nailing e444 6 10.1 Paved Driveway&parking areas 3 Insulation-Ceiling e9r2,13 7.17-11 Insulation-Underfloor 6424i 7-17'(13 FINAL BUILDING (364) 4 73-58 70 All of the above must be approved. Occupancy approval Pr SFR only- Commercial structures require a separate Certificate of Oc'cuparrcv. DO NOT OCCUPY BUILDING WITHOUT BUILDING DEPARTMENTAPPROVAL PROTECT THIS CARD FROM THE WEATHER Energy Code-Duct Testing -Provide signed affidavit to Bldg Dept OZIA 7,17,-31 611-1 Energy Code-Air Leakage Test(Blower Door Test) MA -7-n--51 / 00021 L&I -Electrical Final Inspection 612-0 747 ( -7i7-I3 PW- Final Inspection-Utilities < 7-17- ? Vo1-0, Pak& izdese • FIRE-Final Inspection 7-14-)/ Final Inspection-Building 7-17,--5) 1 • FINAL BUILDING All e above must be approved. (360 473-5870 e,INO -2c4- (3 Occupancy approval in SER only- Commercial structures require a separate Certificate of Occupancy. DO NOT OCCUPY BUILDING WITHOUT BUILDING DEPARTMENTAPPROVAL PROTECT THIS CARD FROM,THE WEATHER „Kitsap County Parcel Search Page 1 of 1 a 11., ,1 _ Ty «�,ew GEOGRAPHICP INFORMATIUON SYSTEM as f �N� + .r$ `.,anav a��^'` .�' .�.. ` � � s „ a . 614,Division Street,M5-21 z x ��. •• , , �:- , :a�#w t � ' A�„ ._. t .��,: Port Orchard,WA 98366 Applications Parcel Search KITSAP COUNTY PARCEL SEARCH Voter Information ; Section Downloads Zoom to an area: --Select Area Data . Download Data Data Change Request Links to External Data I Printable Maps Map Library General About Us Contact Us Search On In' Home A full or partialby taxTax accountAccnumber may be entered. tytiPprt ` '91 ._. __...... . Search by Address r Do NOT enter Street Direction(E,WN,S)or Street Suffix(St.,Ave., rr«v yisaay{,m 5 Blvd.,etc.).A list of potential matches will be displayed. Ct Search by Taxpayer Enter last name first or a partial name. Show 2009 Imagery(1:24 000).El 5559-noo,o20 0109 Show 2007 Imagery(eg; 1:24 000)' Copynght.2011-..itsap'County Tax assessment,property,and valuation 360.337.7160 SNOW TeX Account ID:[ questions: Show Contour Lines: ;i Tax payment questions: 360.337.7135 Permit and zoning questions: 360.337.7181 DISCLAIMER:This map is intended for display purposes only and is not intended for any legal representations. Last Updated: Copyright©1995-2011 Kitsap County GIS.All rights reserved. October 06.2011 Support Privacy Policy Disclaimer Comments • http://kcwppub3.co.kitsap.wa.us/ParcelSearch/map.asp?Cmd=Z... 12/13/2012 SETBACKS FrontFro 6 ` R�eac L,O' The is measured from ex the propel line tzar finished 1.-I --.'-'3 ' '' PIN m - - -;\(9s .le , - Revise,d '/ DRI��WAY 0 61 t�;�/// �a ,,,, - �� �� ya a ,, ���0 •,;7i, -,ifo\--,".to i,#\t‘s 11,,., Itft f� �'�4 • RECEIVED ; lI�i,� / i ....,19 -''''''''''' '' City of Bremerton o . �,�r iii‘e 1.���� MAR 11 2013 -41%-- "-- .,- iit Department of 3 �f�' 49///0" AT Pj1. Community Development 5)1.6-9---- 111 A 10*0764 �nc 0. 7764 \ __,T9 • 5G EAST FAR< PARCEL I, SLA 2 LOT 11 / L2AL-16&0A 2231 SSCHLEY BLVD BREMERTON WA PARCEL "5559-000-020-0109 COVERAGE CALC. LOT AREA. 2,869 SF SCALE 1:2 PROPOSED STRUCTURE 3 LOT COVERAGE 72 SF ReViS SETBACKS -{ Front:_ __r OP Rear: 0' 3S�e The setback is measured from , Z`� ., %S '�' the.property line to the finished b-3 „: - '^\ ex/erior wall. CONCRETE \\ \\ '-DRIVEUTAY 1/\ .1' \\.41.-. 4.• it. 4 a i .Nt i ‘‘'il 'A\V‘+4., :_ititimfi., ,,i,v--,„1. , .„„;0,,,,:,,,,,, ..„3.,_ \„, '- ji.... V\ilall/ / V\ISk. _ 1/44,1'1\ \Ilif 7 i \ ilif 1% s S \ / , /AA\ 0% , 'I.9 \4 ri iffii;,\ ' - 14 f 11 I ,/fr'‘'' i , EAST PARK PARCEL I, BLA 2 LOT 11 / L2AL-1660A 2231 SCHLEY BLVD BREMERTON WA PARCEL 5555-000-020-0109 COVERAGE CALC. LOT AREA', 2,865 SF SCALE 1:20 PROPOSED STRUCTURE a 1,312 SF LOT COVERAGE a 41.8% DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION CITY OF 345 — 6th Street, Suite 600 BREMERTON Bremerton, Washington (360) 473-5275 INSPECTION REPORT PERMIT #: -613 (Z CZ46-6./ ADDRESS: 2-2-31 5Alb/ 7( v Com` Qe6s Pin s <cer riA L2) Cid4N1.,_12, 6locki-e/_:z See err, s c` R . -a--� � c Date: 4 -to-t3 Phone: 7 :52 CI6 a4/21/4 NSPECTOR ti Field Report ti EnviroSound Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Consulting Project Name:The Ridge at East Park Job Number: ESC 13-G014 Client: Highmark Homes LLC Date: 3-18-13 Weather: Sunny Report Number: 1 Purpose of Visit: Observe footing excavations Permit Number: BB12 00661 Reviewed By: Shawn E. Williams,LG/LEG Arrived on site at 1530. A representative of EnviroSound Consultants (EnviroSound) arrived on site as requested to verify the load bearing capacity of the foundation for Lot 17. At the time of the site visit the footings had been excavated with form work in place. The footing had been excavated approximately 1 foot below' existing grade with 3 grade breaks along the foundation for a total elevation drop of approximately 5.3 ,t feet. The footings were periodically probed by the EnviroSound representative utilizing a steel rod It approximately 5/8 of an inch in diameter. The soils were found to be relatively dense to very dense with little to no penetration and suitable for the proposed bearing load capacity of 1,500 psf which was specified in onsite Landmark Design Site Plans. Departed site shortly after 1600. END OF REPORT • • EnviroSound Consulting • 3388 Byron Street Ste 200 • Silverdale, WA 98383 360.698.5950 Fax 360.698.5929 19) 6 • .... I a 0 Li Co ( :r • PERMIT CENTER _ - RESIDENTIAL REMET Building Permit Application _____ \/ Departmcnt of Community Dcreiopuu•nt - 31:i-6th Street.Suite 600 ` Bremerton ' WA ' 98337-1873 (;,(50) 173-.i27,i ` Fax O(i0) 17r'-.i278 ° lrtrtr.ci.I)1Ctnciton.t►a.us ;\ppliccaiit: I „J (Owner EllContractor I Authorized Agent Site Address: 2231 Schley Blvd To apply for a property address,contact Public Works at(360)473-5270 CONTRACTOR: Highmark Homes OWNER: Same _ Address: 16400 Southcenter Pkwy. #210Address: --•------- City, State, Zip: Tukwila, WA 98188 City, State, Zip: _____ ---- I_icenseft& Exp. Date:HIGHMHL904R7 1 2-27hone#: ( ---- Contact Name: Thomas Tollen 12 Authorized Agent Name: Mike Gora____�_ Contact Phone#: (253 J255-5532 Address: 16400 Southcenter Pkw1#21 0 . Tukwila, WA 98188 Email address: thomast@windermere,cpm City, Slate, Tip: - — Tax ID/Parcel #: 5559-000.-020-0109 Phone#: ( 253) 255-5532 _____,_ " —ewer t ; Septic Email addressmike@highmarkhomes. us __~ �Nsty Construction (^!Alteration J I Addition iilfVh?i is the appi3catiott tor? (Please check) __ �� RESIDENTIAL REBUILD ----- jX1 NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE t____I Li NEW DUPLEX . (____( RESIDENTIAL ADDITION L__✓I NEW MANUFACTURED HOME L} RESIDENTIAL REPAIR • t�j NEW GARAGE/CARPORT Li NEW ACCESSORY BUILDING t N si Interior ____;-5I Exterior __Si Foundation Wall- _ st ;toot/Section'` 'Separate demolition permit and fees required. Contact Public Works for sewer cap permit(473-5270). Sewer must be capped prior to demolition permit issuance. r----1 OTHER: IS THIS PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FEET OFA SHORELINE? YES L:J NO 17_1 • Scope of work proposed: New SFR — Square Footage: Building: 1st Floor 860 Basement Garage: 1st Floor413 2nd Floor 800 Other 2nd Floor Deck(s): I Valuation ( Plan Review Fee ( Permit Fee Surcharge ( Total Fees T5/ 3J 1 Application for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the dale of application shall expire by limitation,and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days cn request by the applicant,showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. No applicant shalt be extended more than once. In order to renew action on an application after expiation,the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee. ..-.4../ ../ ilei. Y,.%4...,.z.__ /frii t'.44- y-, G. �;'.',/-'t / cl _/V-/2 _ Applicant's Signature (Print) Date Rev.Oct 2038 (Continued on back) . L/ter Y. oc PERMIT CENTER Dept. of Community Development*345 -6th Street, Suite 600*Bremerton*WA*98337-1873 Ifa Mechanical 0 Plumbing Type of Fuel: 0 Electric X Gas ❑Oil El Propane Occupancy: 32Residential 0 Commercial Site Address: ,1 0 3/ ,ice//1 , /54 4/4 CONTRACTOR: Indoor Comfort Systems, Inc. OWNER: Highmark Homes Address: 118 Violet Meadows St. S. Address: 16400 Southcenter Pkwy. #210 City, State, Zip: Tacoma, WA 98444 City, State, Zip: Tukwila, WA 98188 License#: INDOOCS 132OH Phone# (253)255-5532 Contact Phone#: (253)539-1424 Tax ID/Parcel #: NO. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT NO. TYPE OF FIXTURE AIR HANDLING UNIT>10,000CFM ATMOSPHERIC VACUUM BRKR 1-5 AIR HANDLING UNIT<10,000 CFM ATMOSPHERIC VACUUM BRKR>5 4 BATH FAN AND/OR EXHAUST FAN BACKFLOW DEVICE<=2" CLASS 1 HOOD&DUCT SYSTEM BACKFLOW DEVICE>2" CLASS 2 HOOD&DUCT SYSTEM BUILDING SEWER I CLOTHES DRYER W/EXHAUST CLOTHES WASHER COMMERCIAL FURNACE/DUCT COMMERCIAL FLOOR DRAIN COMM. FURNACE>100,000 BTUS DISHWASHER COMPRESSORS DRAIN PIPE/VENT PIPE ALTERATION 1 COOK STOVE W/EXHAUST DRINKING FOUNTAIN DUCT CHANGE W/O NEW FURNACE FLOOR DRAIN ELECTRIC FURNACE/HEAT PUMP FLOOR SINK/INDIRECT WASTE EVAPORATIVE COOLER GREASE INTERCEPTOR 1 FIREPLACE-GAS OR GAS LOG INSERT HOSE BIBBS FIREPLACE-WOOD,OR WOODSTOVE INDUSTRIAL SAND/OIL INTERCEPTOR 1 GAS WATER HEATER&VENT LAWN SPRINKLER WI BACKFLOW DEV. 3 GAS PIPING ROOF DRAIN MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL SHAMPOO SINK W/BACKFLOW DEVICE 1 NATURAL GAS FURNACE/DUCTING SINK(LAV,KITCHEN, MOP OR BAR) PROPANE FURNACE/DUCTING SUMP PUMP PROPANE TANK(<2000 GALLONS) TUB AND/OR SHOWER UNIT UNIT HEATER WATER CLOSET AND/OR URINAL OTHER: OTHER OTHER: OTHER: MECHANICAL FEES: PLUMBING FEES: TOTAL FEES: nc4., /- - ✓( /i-/t,--//2 Applicant's Signature Date e lased • RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE I. Site Address: 3/ --/?i4``P U/J 2. Are any areas being developed on the site within 200 feet of the shoreline? Yes/Q NOTE: If yes, please fill out a Shoreline Permit Submittal Checklist(WAC 173-27-180) • CRITICAL AREA CHECKLIST: 3. Slope is calculated by dividing the vertical Check all that apply to the site and areas within 200 feet of the distance by the horizontal distance and then site. multiplying the result by 100. Example: yFlat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling:slopes on site generally less than 15%. Vertical • Distance=20' Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30%. Steep: grades of than 30% present on site. Horizontal g' greater Distance = 100' Other(please describe): Vertical 20 feet Horizontal 100 feet=.2 X 100=20%slope 4. Does the site or properties within 200 feet of the site contain areas of standing water,creek or an area where water flows across the ground surface? Yes/( o 5. Is there an apparent wetland present on the site or on properties within 200 feet of the site? Yes a RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEET: 6. What is the amount of grading proposed(in cubic yards), not including foundation area? Fill amount ,O Cut amount / Total grading 145'5 r/>` 5V/4f NOTE: Grading over 50 cubic yards requires a separate permit. Will the grading material be imported or exported? 0/No 7. Please provide the following information. The setbacks are measured from the finished exterior wall . of a structure to the lot line, not from the foundation. Accurately represent your setbacks on site plan. DESCRIPTION 7 PROPOSED Front yard setback c!' *Use this as the second front yard setback Rear yard setback* f for corner lots and through lots. Side 'ard setback Side yard setback 5", **Development Coverage is defined as Maximum height that portion by impervious ! of a lot covered tm Develo 3ment covera_e�� surface areas of all structures, and x _ �1�:-��v _ Number of off-street impervious paved areas, such as parkin spaces i oC driveways and walkways. Residential Questionnaire Revision: October 2008 'R Wised B/3 fEIVED City of Bramoricua RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE MAR 1 1 2 013 3/ f t/ `' -,7 Department of 1. Site Address: 1�C y 4. Community Development 2. Are any areas being developed on the site within 200 feet of the shoreline? Yes 4119 NOTE: If yes,please fill out a Shoreline Permit Submittal Checklist(WAC 173-27-180) CRITICAL AREA CHECKLIST: 3. Slope is calculated by dividing the vertical Check all that apply to the site and areas within 200 feet of the distance by the horizontal distance and then site. multiplying the result by 100. Example: s Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. 1/ Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15%. Vertical Distance=20' Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30%. 1 Horizontal Steep: grades of greater than 30%.present on site. Distance = 100' Other(please describe): Vertical 20 feet Horizontal 100 feet=.2 X 100=20%slope 4. Does the site or properties within 200 feet of the site contain areas of standing water,creek or an area where water flows across the ground surface? Yes 5. Is there an apparent wetland present on the site or on properties within 200 feet of the site? Yes RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHEET: 6. What is the amount of grading proposed(in cubic yards),not including foundation area? Fill amount Cut amount Total grading Z s5 17/4'v iyAf NOTE: Grading over 50 cubic yards requires a separate permit. Will the grading material be imported or exported? Yes I No 7. Please provide the following information. The setbacks are measured from the finished exterior wall of a structure to the lot line,not from the foundation. Accurately represent your setbacks on site plan. DESCRIPTION PROPOSED Front yard setback 9' *Use this as the second front yard setback Rear yard setback* /7 i for corner lots and through lots. Side yard setback 1' G " Side yard setback s''' o" **Development Coverage is defined as Maximum height 2 7' that portion of a lot covered by impervious Development coverage** y7.4 surface areas of all structures, and Number of off-street impervious paved areas, such as Pg spaces s aces driveways and walkways. Residential Questionnaire Revision: October 2008 S'ia ,( C 9 PERMIT CENTER Dept. of Community Development*345—6th Street, Suite 600*Bremerton*WA*98337-1873 I0 Mechanical j . Plumbing Type of Fuel: 0 Electric X Gas ❑Oil 0 Propane Occupancy: ii4 Residential 0 Commercial Site Address: a 3/ J )/i ' CONTRACTOR: Peltram Plumbing OWNER: Highmark Homes Address: 1929 W. Valley Hgwy. S. Address: 16400 Southcenter kwy.. #210 City, State, Zip: Auburn, WA 98001 City, State, Zip: Tukwila, WA 98188 License#: PELTRPI075DZ Phone# (253)255-5532 Contact Phone#: (253)891-8781 Tax ID/Parcel #: NO. TYPE OF EQUIPMENT NO. TYPE OF FIXTURE AIR HANDLING UNIT>10,000CFM ATMOSPHERIC VACUUM BRKR 1-5 AIR HANDLING UNIT<10,000 CFM ATMOSPHERIC VACUUM BRKR>5 BATH FAN AND/OR EXHAUST FAN BACKFLOW DEVICE<=2" CLASS 1 HOOD&DUCT SYSTEM BACKFLOW DEVICE>2" CLASS 2 HOOD&DUCT SYSTEM 1 BUILDING SEWER CLOTHES DRYER W/EXHAUST 1 CLOTHES WASHER COMMERCIAL FURNACE/DUCT COMMERCIAL FLOOR DRAIN COMM. FURNACE>100,000 BTUS 1 DISHWASHER COMPRESSORS DRAIN PIPENENT PIPE ALTERATION COOK STOVE W/EXHAUST DRINKING FOUNTAIN DUCT CHANGE W/O NEW FURNACE FLOOR DRAIN ELECTRIC FURNACE/HEAT PUMP FLOOR SINK/INDIRECT WASTE EVAPORATIVE COOLER GREASE INTERCEPTOR FIREPLACE-GAS OR GAS LOG INSERT 2 HOSE BIBBS FIREPLACE-WOOD,OR WOODSTOVE INDUSTRIAL SAND/OIL INTERCEPTOR GAS WATER HEATER&VENT LAWN SPRINKLER W/BACKFLOW DEV. GAS PIPING ROOF DRAIN MISCELLANEOUS MECHANICAL SHAMPOO SINK W/BACKFLOW DEVICE NATURAL GAS FURNACE/DUCTING 5(`' SINK(LAV,KITCHEN,MOP OR BAR) PROPANE FURNACE/DUCTING SUMP PUMP PROPANE TANK(<2000 GALLONS) 2 TUB AND/OR SHOWER UNIT UNIT HEATER 3 WATER CLOSET AND/OR URINAL OTHER: OTHER OTHER: OTHER: MECHANICAL FEES: PLUMBING FEES: TOTAL FEES: Applicant's Signature Date CITY OF BREMERTON PERMIT NUMBER: BB12 00661 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT •DATE ISSUED: 03/12/2013 • 345-6th Street,Suite 600,Bremerton,WA 98337 (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278 'A"SESSOR NUMBER: 5559-000-020-0109 ZONING: HDR SITE ADDRESS: '2231 SCHLEY BLVD,LT 17 t LICANT NAME: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255-5532 ADDRESS: ,16400 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY STE 204,SEATTLE,WA OWNER NAME: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255-5532 ADDRESS: 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE 204,TUKWILA,WA 981 CONTRACTOR: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255-5532 ADDRESS: 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY#204,SEATTLE,WA 98188 LENDER NAME: PHONE: 0- DRESS: SUBMITTED: 12/11/2012 APPROVED: 03/12/2011, E R N: 09/08/2013 STATUS: ISSUED VALUATION: $178,632.11 Residential Building Permit I e'chanicalIPlumbing 50%Plan Review Fee $513.50 16.4580 NEW SFR W/ATTAC ED GI\R& DECK(BASIC BS12 00009) Building Permit 51,580.00 2211 Building Code Editio • IRC 2009 Mechanical Fixture Fee $151.90 2215 Occupancy Group: R-3 State Surcharge S4.50 0236 Type of Construction: Type V, Sprinklered Plumbing Fixture Fee $111.00 2213 Flood Zone: State Energy Code $50.00 16-4580 Setbacks: (Front) (Side) (Rear) (Other) TOTAL FEES: $2,410.90 Sanitation Method: Public Sewer System Number of Bedrooms: 4 Square Footage: R-3 Residential,1&2 Family,Type VB 1.660 U Utility/Deck Covered(All Types) 28 U Utility/Private Garage,Type VB 413 Inspection Requests FIRE:Fire Inspections (360)473-5386 DCD:Building Inspections (360)473-5870 HEALTH:Kitsap County Health District (360)337-5285 L&I:Department of Labor and Industries (360)415-4000 PW&U:Public Works-Engineering (360)473-5270 This permit shall become null and void if the described work authorized by this permit has not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance,or if the work is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. It is the responsibility of the permit holder to see that the required inspections are made. Failure to obtain required inspections may result in stoppage of the work until such time that the permit holder can susbstantiate to the City of Bremerton that the concealed work meets or exceeds code requirements. Any demolition,testing,or financial burden shall be borne directly by the permit holder. Failure to substantiate code requirements will indemnify the City against any and all responsibility or liability connected with the construction. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel provisions of any State or local law regulating construction or the performance of the construction. If listing the owner as general contractor,I certify that I am exempt from the requirements of the State Contractor's Registration Law under Section 3,Chapter 126,Laws of 1967. All revisions to an approved plan require DCD review and approval prior to performing work. All building and tenant occupancy permits are required to pass final inspection prior to permit expiration and obtain a certificate of occupancy prior to use or occupancy. I have read,and agree't.abide. y the conditions of this permit including all conditions of zoning,building codes,and State and Federal laws. SIGNATURE OF OWNER•' AGENT: p 1rR PRINTED NAME: -vl/C✓� - e'"'X�` DATE: — `� CONDITIONS City of Bremerton's app oval o is application pertains only to the City's regulatory jurisdiction, and thus compliance with City regulations does not -cessarily ensure compliance with federal or state laws. 10. (DCD-47) DCD: Reinspection Fee:All approved plans,the printed building permit, and the permit cul_ inspection placard, are required to be on-site for inspection purposes, and work to be inspected shall be complete and ready for inspection. If an inspection is called for and plans are not available on site,or the work is not ready for inspection, approval will not be granted. In addition, a re-inspection fee will be charged and must be collected by the Department of Community Development prior to any further inspections being performed or approvals granted. 10. (DCD-50) Final Inspection Required:All building permits shall have a final inspection performed and approved by the City of Bremerton Department of Community Development prior to permit expiration. The failure to request a final inspection or failure to obtain final approval prior to expiration may require a reactivation fee, or a new permit application if more than a year has passed with no activity. 10. (DCD-01) ASBESTOS: Prior to•performing any renovation or demolition work, Puget Sound Clean Air Page 1 of 4 CITY OF BREMERTON PERMIT NUMBER: BB12 00661 I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE ISSUED: 03/12/2013 E 345-6th Street,Suite 600,Bremerton,WA 98337 (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278. ASSESSOR NUMBER: 5559-000-020-0109 ZONING: HDR SITE ADDRESS: 2231 SCHLEY BLVD,LT 17 AP LICANT NAME: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (2531255-5532 ADDRESS; 16400 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY STE 204.SEATTLE,WA OWNER NAME: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255-5532 ADDRESS: 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE 204.TUKWILA,WA 981 CONTRACTOR: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255.5532 ADDRESS: 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY#204,SEATTLE,WA 98188 LENDER NAME: PHONE: (I- ADDRESS: SUBMITTED: 12/11!2012 APPROVED: 03/12/2013 EXPIRATION: 09/08/2013 STATUS: ISSUED Agency and Washington Department of Labor and Industries(L&l)regulations require an asbestos survey be performed to determine whether there are asbestos-containing materials in the work area or structure. The asbestos survey must be conducted by and EPA-certified (AHERA) building inspector(except renovation or owner-occupied single family residences).For more information,please contact Clean Air Agency through their web site at www.pscleanair.org or by phone at 800-552-3565 or 206-343-8800. The L&I web site can be found at www.lni.wa.gov/TradesLicensing/LicensingReq/Asbestos/default.asp. LEAD-BASED PAINT:A contractor or person receiving compensation who is performing renovation. repairs or painting on a residential building or a child-occupied facility built before 1978, must be trained and certified by an accredited training provider, and registered as a Renovator by the Washington State Department of Commerce-Lead-Based Paint Program. For further information please contact: The Department of Commerce website at: www.commerce.wa.gov/lead,or call: (360)586-LEAD(5323). 10. (DCD-02) DCD: Validity of permit. The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of.any violation of any of the provisions of the Washington State • Building code or of any other ordinance of the City of Bremerton. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of the Washington State Building code or other ordinances of the City of Bremerton shall not be valid. The issuance of a permit based on construction documents and other.data shall not prevent the building official from requiring the correction of errors in the construction documents and other data. The building official is also authorized to prevent occupancy or use of a structure where in violation of the Washington State Building code or of any other ordinances of the City of Bremerton. 11. (DCD-52) DCD: Gas Piping: Fuel or gas piping shall be inspected after the installation of fuel/gas. , piping is complete, and before the attachment of fixtures, appliances, or shut-off valves.At the time of inspection the test pressure shall be no less than 10 psi held for no less than 15 minutes.Appliances to be attached to the fuel/gas piping system shall not be used until the final inspection has been performed and approved by a Building Inspector. 12. (DOD-FUEL APPLY COMBUSTION AIR: IRC Section M1701.1. Solid-fuel-burning appliances shall be provided with combustion air in accordance with the appliance manufacturer's installation instructions. Oil-fired appliances shall be provided with combustion air in accordance with NFPA 31. The requirements for combustion and dilution air for gas-fired appliances shall be in accordance with Chapter 24. Fireplaces shall comply with Section 1001. APPLIANCE LOCATIONS: IRC Section G2406.2, Fuel burning appliances shall not be installed in a sleeping room, bathroom, toilet room, or closet. Exception: direct vent appliances(see IRC Section G2406.2 for additional exceptions). PROTECTION OF APPLIANCES:, IRC Section M1307.3. Appliances located in a garage or carport or any other location subject to vehicle damage shall be protected by approved barriers.Appliances having an ignition source shall be elevated so that the source of ignition is at least 18"above the floor in garages and in any room that opens to the garage. Appliances designed to be fixed in position shall be fastened or anchored in an approved method. CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS: IRC Section 315.An approved carbon monoxide alarm listed with UL 2034 shall be installed outside of each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedroom.'In a building where a tenancy exists,the tenant shall maintain the CO alarm as specified by the manufacturer including replacement of the batteries. MANUFACTURER'S SPECS: IRC M1307.1.The manufacturer's operating and installation instructions shall remain attached to the appliance until final inspection 13. (DCD-04) DCD: Plan Review Requirements: The attached plan review checklist and identified corrections. along with the Energy Compliance Worksheet(when applicable)are part of the approved plans and must remain attached thereto. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make the corrections indicated on the plans.Once the plans are marked "APPROVED",they shall not be changed or altered without authorization from the Building Official. All proposed changes to"APPROVED"building plans that effect compliance with the City of Page 2 of 4 A' CITY OF BREMERTON PERMIT NUMBER: BB12 00661 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE ISSUED: 03/12/2013 • 345-6th Street,Suite 600,Bremerton,WA 98337 u� (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278 ASSESSOR NUMBER: 5559-000-020-0109 ZONING: HDR SITE ADDRESS: 2231 SCHLEY BLVD,LT 17 AOilltICANT NAME: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255-5532 ADDRESS: 16400 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY STE 204.SEATTLE,WA OWNER NAME: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255-5532 ADDRESS: 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE 204,TUKWILA.WA 981 CONTRACTOR: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255-5532 ADDRESS: 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY 4'204,SEATTLE,WA 98188 LENDER NAME: PHONE: 0- ADDRESS: SUBMITTED: 12i11/2012 APPROVED: 03/12/2013 EXPIRATION: 09/08/2013 STATUS: ISSUED Bremerton Building and Fire Code as adopted and amended in BMC Title 17 and Title 18, or any other City of Bremerton ordinance or regulation, must be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development prior to construction. Failure to comply and/or removal of attached documents will result in failure of required building inspections. 14. (DCD-060) Property lines shall be properly marked. Setbacks are measured to the fnished wall of the structure. 15. (DCD-43) Under-floor Inspection:After the foundation is complete, and the floor system is framed, but prior to the installation of the sub-floor or floor sheathing, (exposed floor framing)the under- floor area must be inspected, including all floor framing, anchor bolts, hold-downs and under- floor posts and positive connection devices. 16. (DCD-19) Engineered Wood Floor Trusses&Truss Roof Systems shall have a site specific engineered design (Framing Plan)available at time of Under Floor and/or Framing Inspection. 17. (DCD-38) Shear Wall Inspection: Due to the complexity of the shear wall nailing patterns and hold- down requirements contained within the engineered lateral design, a separate shear wall inspection is required for this project. This inspection should be requested and performed prior to the installation of exterior wall coverings. prior to the framing inspection, such that all shear-wall nailing patterns may be observed,and the installation of all required hold-down devices and required straps,etc. are in place in accordance with the engineer's lateral design. 18. (DCD-14) DCD: Approved Plans, Engineering, Site Plan, Permit, and Conditions shall remain on site 1A-14- and be available for inspection. Any changes to plans shall be approved before construction is performed.Architect or engineer of record shall approve the change before submitting a revision.A revision is subject to a revision fee and additional fees for plan review and inspections. 19. (DCD-CO DET. (NE Carbon Monoxide Alarms. For new construction,an approved carbon monoxide alarm listed 14(4•14- in compliance with UL 2034 shall be installed outside of each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedroom in dwelling units within which fuel-fired appliances are installed and in dwelling units that have attached garages. In a building where a tenancy exists,the tenant shall maintain the CO alarm as specified by the manufacturer including replacement of the batteries. 20. (FIRE-13D) A 13D compliant fire sprinkler system is required. 14- All Bathrooms and spaces larger than 10 sqft are required to be covered unless specifically exempt. All balconies not waived during plan review are required to be covered. A fire sprinkler head is.required within 4'of the top of the stove. Including all spaces with fuel fired appliances. No portion of the plan review or inspection process exempts the designer or installer from the specifics of Fire Code or NFPA requirements, A bucket test is required. ALL PERMIT DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO REMAIN AT THE FIRE SPRINKLER RISER DURING THE ENTIRE INSTALLATION. COPIES ARE ACCEPTABLE. 20. (OTHER) A fire sprinkler system is required for the parcels located in Bay Vista per the conditions of approval for the plat.The sprinkler system may be installed in accordance with NFPA 13D for a single family residence. 21. (OTHER) Development must comply with the requirements of the East Park Sub-Area Plan and the ddl'_ Zoning Code. Driveway width shall not exceed 20'in width. Page 3 of 4 CITY OF BREMERTON PERMIT NUMBER: BB12 00661 i • _I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE ISSUED: 03/12/2013 I 1117g 345-6th Street,Suite 600,Bremerton,WA 98337 (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278 ASSESSOR NUMBER: 5559-000-020-0109 ZONING: HDR SITE ADDRESS: 2231 SCHLEY BLVD,LT 17 APaCANT NAME: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255-5532 ADDRESS: ,16400 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY STE 204,SEATTLE.WA OWNER NAME: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: (253)255-5532 ADDRESS: 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY STE 204,TUKWILA,WA 981 CONTRACTOR: HIGHMARK HOMES LLC PHONE: '(253)255-5532 ADDRESS: 16400 SOUTHCENTER PKWY#204,SEATTLE,WA 98188 LENDER NAME: PHONE: 0- ADDRESS: SUBMITTED: 12/11/2012 APPROVED: 03/12/2013 EXPIRATION: 09/08/2013 STATUS: ISSUED MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED To request an inspection,please call(360)473-5870 and be sure to provide your permit number,name on permit,site address,contact phone number,and inspection type.To register for on-line inspection access,visit the City's website at www.ci.bremerton.wa.us. Special Inspection-Geotechnical-Soils Compaction &Bearing Send to Bldg Dept Geotechnical report for retaining wall placement, Send report to Bldg Dept Geotechnical Report for Structural Fill and Compaction, Soil Bearing Foundation Footings, Property lines shall be properly identified Foundation Walls/Hold downs Geotechnical Engineer Final Letter, Send report to Bldg Dept Plumbing Groundwork Underfloor Framing Inspection/Anchor Bolts&Washers/Hold•Downs Shear Wall Panels/Braced Wall Panels Mechanical Rough-In Plumbing Rough-In Gas Piping Pressure Test L&I -Electrical Cover.Inspection Before Framing(State of Washington) FIRE-Fire Sprinkler/Fire Alarm Cover Framing Inspection (Mechanical& Plumb Rough-In, Elect Cover Completed) • Insulation-Wall Sheetrock Nailing Paved Driveway&parking areas Insulation-Ceiling Insulation-Underfloor Energy Code-Duct Testing-Provide signed affidavit to Bldg Dept Energy Code-Air Leakage Test(Blower Door Test) - L&I-Electrical Final Inspection PW-Final Inspection-Utilities FIRE-Final Inspection Final Inspection-Building FIXTURE LIST Qty Description Qty Description 1 R-Clothes Washing Machine 1 R-Gas Water Heater Vent&Combustion Air 2 R-Tub and/or Shower Unit 1 R-Clothes Dryer with Exhaust 2 R-Hose Bibs 3 R-Gaspipe System LPG/NATL/OIL 4 R-Sink(Lavatory, Kitchen, Mop or Bar Sink) 1 R-Fireplace-Gas, or Gas Log Insert 3 R-Water Closet and/or Urinal 1 R-Cook Stove with Exhaust 1 R-Dish Washer 1 R-Range Hood 4 R-Bath Fan and/or Exhaust Fan 1 R-Natural Gas Furnace+/- Ducting Page 4 of 4