HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/15/2017 AGENDA PACKETCITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 - Phone (360) 473-5280
MARCH 15, 2017
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
1. BRIEFING: 5:00 — 5:30 P.M. in %:OUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603
A. Review of Agenda
B. General Council Business (As necessary...)
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. in FIRST FLOOR CHAMBERS
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation
3. MAYOR'S REPORT
4. POLICE DEPARTMENT BRIEFING — By Police Chief Steve Strachan
5. PUBLIC RECOGNITION
6. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Claims & Check Register
B. Minutes of Meeting — March 1, 2017
C. Minutes of Study Session — March 8, 2017
D. Confirm Appointment of Jaime Forsyth to the City of Bremerton Arts Commission
E. Resolution No. 3286 to reaffirm City Council's support of the City of Bremerton Employee
Wellness Program
F. Purchase of four (4) 2017 Ford Interceptors for the Fire Department from Columbia Ford of
Longview, WA
G. Purchase of one (1) 2017 Ford F-550 4WD Flatbed Truck for the Forestry Department from
Columbia Ford of Longview, WA
H. Purchase of eight (8) Wireless Mobile Column Lifts for Equipment Services from NW Lift &
Equipment of Hillsboro, OR
I. Contract Award to Michels Corporation for the 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation Project
J. Professional Services Agreement with HDR Inc., for Design of Innovative Safety
Improvements for West Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety
Projects
7. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Accept US Department of Transportation Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Innovative Safety Grant; and Approve WSDOT Local Agency Agreement for the West Belfair
Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Projects
B. Resolution No. 3287 to accept and approve Annexation Proceedings for territory adjacent to
Corbet Drive
8. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
9. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
® Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations please
contact the City Clerk at (360) 473-5323 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
A,
!FM
a
O
O
LO
r
O
N
C�
r
1 I �.l]
�� � 3
crf
0
r
.�Z
0
0
d
d
0
4-
3
0
I -1
`—W
N
a o
a
a
c a
o
0
o t1 p
¢
r
C
p Q
i
a �
�
•� tya�_
a
0 .'2
c, ao aIL
o °;
N +
}
E °y i a
ji } p }
a 0
} _P
a
d
a
}
0
••00
•
0•
••.•
•: •• V
0
. •
♦�
anyDifi�pd
i
L'
Ln
•
•
any
JlDd
.�Z
0
0
d
d
0
4-
3
0
I -1
`—W
N
Q
LU
W
J
J
0
LL
c
0
x
Q
J
Q
D
LA
tl
�
M
7
N
q
O
P
U
W
E
N
o
2
n
N
o
O
L
U
a
N
m
�
N
J
J
U
N
cn
a
W
N
U
ZOO
O
O
LU
0
N
�
�
(D
U
O
• •
L
L
�
Co
O
},
O
cl
�
O
O
O
4�
o
w
w
40*
C13m
U)
W
^,
_�
Q
c�
�
o
w
r
E
E
CDP
'V
07
r
+�DWE
Lntxo
r
rr
w
ww
w
w
r
E
E
CDP
'V
07
V
Q
O
L
E
W
O .0
0-0 -0
i a LJ
i Eoo U)
E
Lo o
o
co U
r 4-5
c�
o
N � a)
Q -0
0 rYE
L
o6 o �>
Q L cn
Q i �; c�
j
4� c W -0 C/)
> 4)
W Z mU) 0
W
2
N
�/ O ti � m 7
C U 1 4
or
201>
�s
m!
L'
.o
l�
91
r
. —
CU
cn
E
,�
Q�
O
CU
ra
cu
ru
CIE
ro
lJ
Q
ru
d
o
�w
°r1'Ut
u.... wvsssnuxw+�
AN
v-
U
D
I
c
O
D
LU
'i'
Al
t
i�
i
R
a
v
i
n
O
ry
N
LU
O
N
E
0
Q
FS -1
1
co
N
N E
O
N �
o
w
4- 70
<n ELnO
N O
N N L
70
cn
co N �
3 70
j U
Z m C�
1 1 1
1 1 1
6
ME
.5
N
O
O
O
Q
a�
N
N
U
0O
U
N
E N
N
N
-Q
N)
N
rD
N
N
1
.Q
w �
� O
O U
=Q
' - O
� o
m � N
� � O
� O �
O O
N
Q0
4� N E
.�
N
1-0
o N o
LL a� U N
O 70
O N U (D O
n 1 p Q N N 0)
rl ,�oO E
�
U 7C)
O = 1 1 1 0
C>1
`r I
.
tA
M
W
0cL•—
o
M
M
W
O
GC
W
co
LLI
Q
z
Q
O
oc
W
Q
z
a
N
Ln
T-1
Z/ -
LU
co
Ln
p
L
�
C
r
E
O
2
OaA
a)Ln
�Q
cn
U
>
Ln
cn
4-j
C:N
• L
E
C..)
c�
Q
a
>
-�
N
N
.�
Ln
w
U
•roro
ro
-C�0
V)N
C1A
•O
0
U
f:
cn
C:
+-
, _
•�
ro
W•E
N
—
ca
O
0
Ca
cn
Ca
p
V)
N
.N,
ate1
-le
cn
a)
N
Q
-ia>
V)
Ca
m
Em
W
• �
N
V)
QJ
Lu
a
a
w
oo
a-
O
z
m
m
3:
m
�
.
N
Q
O
4—j
O
Ln
W
4
co
GJ
V
caro
a
_
O
C:
0x
W
y
ro
ca
_�
c/
!aA
O
cNn
cNn
4-j
�
ago
CA
lie
N
ro
.0
.N
.N
—
Q�
L
O
X
Ca
�
t%
� 'Ir
C�10
441
m
�
M
L
a
i
>
Lij
N
N
N
u)
ro
W
q)�
U
b
_.
aj
--+
QJ
Q
\
=
i►
V
N
w
"
=3
ro
4-j
4-j
L,
m
o
o
N
o
>>
�i
>
O
�
LL
O
Z
m
V
O
O
W
m
to
O
N
0
N
4-j
4-j
+-j
..
+-
Ln
N
L
i
N
4-jN
a
ate-+
x
LM
o
Ln
00
00
w
00
a)
m
�:
CoLu
m
0
N
40746
N
q
1144 1
"
O
U
O
E
m
V
O
m
w
O
m
N
N
O.
m
N
I
638
|�
-j
<
�
cn
ff Mv
�
� @
z
:
z
kN
un
O
I
Q
O
I
r -
J J
Q
cn
m LLQ
O3:
00
GD p
Cl) LLJ
m
O
W
V)
4-j
V
O
L4Fj
•�
J
A.
lu
"iN yti
3161mimelm w- ANA
141 m M '
ifivir—.S 1 z i !aVil E I
REPORT
JST PROG )RAM YEAR; JAN 1, 2016 — DEC 31, 2016
11
• r)
M
N
T
E
aO
O
O_
Q
T
Q
O
O
O " 0 0 O
CU IE
-0�
O �
t
a
a
O
LL "O
7 •LO
U
OC. (a
Q
Q
-
CL
O
N
N
E
a1
0 N
v�
a)
v
o
n>
o
N
S
7
v+�
c
�
c
O
c
T
CL i
n ,}
o
>
o
o
E
o
a1
aO
n
D
o
C
E
t U
i
CL
+-'
o
E
tea,
>
E
N
w
m
U
O
aO
O
01
T
O
vii
aO N
m
vi
C
O
O U
O
C
ra
u
O_
ra
vOi Q
a0
N
NO
a1
C
,�
ON
C
O
O
O
v
v
Qra
O C
3
O
U
0
0
abO O
u
N
•�
ria
X •v,
O
O
E
E aO
+f6 �
E
Q
Eol
o
v
i
U
OE
a0
O
U
O
C
m
F N
U
i
0
N
N
N
N
Y
a)
WE
-Cu
E
O
F
7
U
i •N
N C
N
O_
O
O'
W
C
O
Q
- 'U
aJ
�n
CO
O
C
Q aO
a1 w
aj
N
N
U
N
O O
_
N O
0
0
=
C
N
vi
In
O a0O
'U
N=
N
16
N
f6
C
c
M
o
T
ra
a)
N
U
ra
-0
v
3 m
E
E
3
3bDw
�:7
O
a)
bOC:
c
N
U
2
7
_
3
i1 T
O
U
o
�
00 v
> E
Q c
v
AA -
c
w
t
LU
m
u
0
U
Y D
O
_0
H
.
O
0 0 Fj5
O " 0 0 O
CU IE
-0�
O �
N Co
a
N O 0�5
LL "O
7 •LO
.S >, �
OC. (a
LO�
O
Q
1 E "O
C
U
0 N
-
co
L �
N
LU
�
d
d O
T
CL i
o~c U
o
d
r-
2 d
-0
W o
o
WG AHD
ASO
o s.� iia
C6
CN
-a E
>, O
Co r -
E c
O
a� a)
CD a)
U) C6
L
a) L
E 7
C2
MV
W
V
r_
m
L
U
0
E
4-0^^
^Y
^W
CL
^0
W
W
4-0-0
C
3
E
E
0
V
CR -05 - Goals and Outcomes
Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan.
91.520(a)
This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and
executed throughout the program year.
Overall, the City of Bremerton met or exceeded its 2016 Year -One Action Plan goals. The City has
demonstrated measurable progress in all of our Consolidated Plan programs and projects. Highlights
include:
INCREASE AND PRESERVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CHOICES
The City of Bremerton, as a member of the Kitsap County HOME Consortium uses its HOME funds for
down payment assistance to homebuyers participating in the Built in Bremerton homeownership
program. This program is a local homeownership program in which Community Frameworks purchases
vacant, foreclosed, or other dilapidated homes within Bremerton's City Limits and rehabs the homes to
quality housing standards, removing hazardous substances, increasing the energy efficiency, upgrading
systems and features, and adding curb appeal. Once rehab is complete, the homes are available for sale
to low-income homebuyers at 80% Area Median Income or below. HOME funds are then used for
downpayment assistance for the homebuyers in the form of a 30 -year One Pay Note at 3% interest.
Kitsap Community Resources used CDBG funds to weatherize and provide minor home repairs for 8
households in the target area and with reallocated money from the City's DPA program, 1 household
with no heat with a child under the age of 6 was provided a new heat system, 1 elderly household, 2
disabled households we provided emergency repairs, and 1 home was provided a roof replacement. The
program was able to hire an Americorps person to do pre-weatherization audits and conduct more in-
depth conservation education with the residents. This is the first year an Americorps member was hired
into the Weatherization and Minor Home Repair Program.
COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The City of Bremerton, Parks Department was awarded funds to complete the ADA Accessible walkway
at the vehicular entrance to Evergreen Rotary Park. With the completion of this walkway, there is now a
full loop surrounding the perimiter of the Park. Included in this work are curb cuts, and wheelchair
ramps providing a safe pathway to Evergreen Rotary Park's Accessible playground. City of Bremerton
CDBG funds helped fund the construction of the Accessible Playground, proving the City's interest in
improving parks in our community.
Kitsap Community Resources Business Education Support and Training Program provides business
training and on-going support services to assist low income individuals with skills to start or expand their
own business. During 2016 the program worked to help 19 new businesses get started,
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
sustained/expanded 23 businesses, and graduated 28 future entrepreneurs from the BE$T program. A
total of 61 jobs were created/retained.
Through City of Bremerton CDBG funds Phase I, construction of a new facade for phase II which is a fully
privately funded project that will convert a chronically vacant building into 28 housing units plus
commerical space and storage. 20% of these units will be made affordable. This project, which had an
inital public investment of $196,629 has led to a private investment of $8 million on improvements and
acquisitions to the entire City block.
Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted
with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward
meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g)
Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators,
units of measure, targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the
grantee's program year goals.
Goal
Category
Sourc
Indicator
Unit of
Expect
Actual
Percen
Expect
Actual
Percen
e/
Measure
ed —
—
t
ed —
—
t
Amou
Strate
Strate
Compl
Progra
Progr
Compl
nt
gic
gic
ete
m
am
ete
Plan
Plan
Year
Year
Public Facility or
Non -
Infrastructure
Housing
Abate
Activities other
Communit
CDBG
Persons
Blight
than
18650
0
965
0
y
Assisted
0.00%
0.00%
Conditions
Low/Moderate
Developm
Income Housing
ent
Benefit
Non -
Housing
Facade
Abate
Communit
CDBG
treatment/busi
Blight
Business
5
0
5
1
y
:$
ness building
0.00%
20.00%
Conditions
Developm
rehabilitation
ent
Non -
Economic
Housing
Jobs
Developme
Communit
CDBG
created/retaine
Jobs
65
61
79
61
nt-City
y
:$
93.85%
77.22%
d
Wide
Developm
ent
Non -
Economic
Housing
Business
Developm
Communi
CDB
Businesses
es
220
84
38.18
79
84
106.3
ent-City
ty
G: $
assisted
Assisted
%
3%
Wide
Developm
ent
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Non -
Increase
Housing
Facade
economic
Communi
CDB
treatment/bus
Business
10
1
10.00
1
1
100.0
opportuni
ty
G: $
iness building
%%
0% 0%
ties
Developm
rehabilitation
ent
Non -
Increase
Housing
Jobs
economic
Communi
CDB
created/retain
Jobs
5
0
61
opportune
ty
G: $
0.00%
ed
ties
Developm
ent
Non -
Increase
Housing
Business
economic
Communi
CDB
Businesses
opportuni
ty
G: $
assisted
es
4
0
0.00%
4
0
0.00%
Assisted
ties
Developm
ent
Preserve
Househ
and
Affordabl
CDB
Rental units
old
Increase
0
0
20
0
e Housing
G: $
constructed
Housing
0.00%
Affordable
Unit
Housing
Preserve
Househ
and
Affordabl
CDB
Rental units
old
Increase
20
1
20
1
a Housing
G: $
rehabilitated
Housing
5.00%
5.00%
Affordable
Unit
Housing
Preserve
Househ
and
Homeowner
Affordabl
CDB
old
Increase
Housing
10
0
e Housing
G: $
Housing
0.00%
Affordable
Added
Unit
Housing
Preserve
Househ
and
Homeowner
Affordabl
CDB
old
Increase
Housing
20
3
15.00
0
3
e Housing
G: $
Housing
Affordable
Rehabilitated
%
Unit
Housing
Preserve
Direct
and
Househ
Affordabl
CDB
Financial
Increase
olds
5
0
10
0
e Housing
G: $
Assistance to
0.00%
0.00%
Affordable
Assisted
Homebuyers
Housing
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Table 1- Accomplishments — Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date
Assess how the jurisdiction's use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and
specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority
activities identified.
The City annually revists and revises the Request for Proposals (RFP) and the guidelines for selcting
subrecipients to carry out the stated goals and outcomes. This new process allows the City to better
align awards with the needs identified in the public process of the consolidated plan. Each of the highest
priorities outlined in the Consolidated Plan, and adopted by the Bremerton Council were weighted with
higher priority.
The City is making steady progress in meeting its goals and objectived as outlined in the Consolidated
Plan. Programs that have a one-year cycle met or exceeded program goals for 2016. Other programs,
notably Capital programs can take up to two years to implement. Consequently, one-year
accomplishments for the two Capital projects have not yet been met. However, the projects are
proceeding as planned and will attain stated goals once they are completed and placed in service.
The City of Bremerton's use of funds addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the
Action Plan. The City looks for projects that are able to leverage resources, and the projects funded in
2016 were able to do just that. The City of Bremerton was able to allocate its recieved Program Income
to fund the ADA improvements at Evergreen Rotary Park in order to provide safe accessible routes to
the Accessible Playground. This year 100% of the allocated funds were used to benefit ILMI residents of
the City.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
4
Public Facility
Non -
or
Infrastructure
Housing
Public
Activities
Communi
CDB
Persons
Facilities-
other than
18960
5620
29.64
5620
5620
100.0
ty
G: $
Assisted
City
Low/Moderat
%
0%
Developm
e Income
ent
Housing
Benefit
Table 1- Accomplishments — Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date
Assess how the jurisdiction's use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and
specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority
activities identified.
The City annually revists and revises the Request for Proposals (RFP) and the guidelines for selcting
subrecipients to carry out the stated goals and outcomes. This new process allows the City to better
align awards with the needs identified in the public process of the consolidated plan. Each of the highest
priorities outlined in the Consolidated Plan, and adopted by the Bremerton Council were weighted with
higher priority.
The City is making steady progress in meeting its goals and objectived as outlined in the Consolidated
Plan. Programs that have a one-year cycle met or exceeded program goals for 2016. Other programs,
notably Capital programs can take up to two years to implement. Consequently, one-year
accomplishments for the two Capital projects have not yet been met. However, the projects are
proceeding as planned and will attain stated goals once they are completed and placed in service.
The City of Bremerton's use of funds addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the
Action Plan. The City looks for projects that are able to leverage resources, and the projects funded in
2016 were able to do just that. The City of Bremerton was able to allocate its recieved Program Income
to fund the ADA improvements at Evergreen Rotary Park in order to provide safe accessible routes to
the Accessible Playground. This year 100% of the allocated funds were used to benefit ILMI residents of
the City.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
4
CR -10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted
Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).
91.520(a)
Table 2 — Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds
Narrative
The families assisted above, were assisted through projects that tracked incomes of families/individuals
served. These numbers do not take into count the area benefit activities which are for activities that
benefit an entire neighborhood. The numbers for activities with area benefit National Objectives are
pulled from census tract data for the neighborhood in which the particular CDBG activity provides
services to. However, ADA improvements provided a public facility benefit of 5620 based on an analysis
of neighborhood demographics and park usage. Jobs created/retained were 61, businesses assisted
were 84, and 1 facade rehabilition is nearing completion to provide for a future commercial space
providing jobs as well as 28 units of housing, of which 20% will be made available as affordable housing
and utilizing the Multifamily Tax Exemption program.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
CDBG
White
22
Black or African American
7
Asian
0
American Indian or American Native
1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3
Total
33
Hispanic
0
Not Hispanic
15
Table 2 — Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds
Narrative
The families assisted above, were assisted through projects that tracked incomes of families/individuals
served. These numbers do not take into count the area benefit activities which are for activities that
benefit an entire neighborhood. The numbers for activities with area benefit National Objectives are
pulled from census tract data for the neighborhood in which the particular CDBG activity provides
services to. However, ADA improvements provided a public facility benefit of 5620 based on an analysis
of neighborhood demographics and park usage. Jobs created/retained were 61, businesses assisted
were 84, and 1 facade rehabilition is nearing completion to provide for a future commercial space
providing jobs as well as 28 units of housing, of which 20% will be made available as affordable housing
and utilizing the Multifamily Tax Exemption program.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
CR -15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds
Source
Resources Made
Available
Amount Expended
During Program Year
CDBG
of Allocation
1,669,752
434,933
Table 3 — Resources Made Available
Narrative
$417,439 was the annual entitlement amount, plus $17,494.07 in program income was made available
for projects in the 2016 program year.
Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments
Target Area
Planned Percentage
Actual Percentage of
Narrative
of Allocation
Allocation
Description
CDBG Target Area
Downtown Bremerton Blight
Zone
10
Downtown/Residential core
N RSA
42
Table 4 — Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments
Narrative
The CDBG Target area and Downtown/Residential core NRSA are the same geographic area, in order to
provide an unduplicated count, the City has determined to count the 42% of allocated funds to projects
within the Downtown/Residential Core NRSA and within that number 10% of that allocation available to
projects taking place in the Blight zone.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Leveraging
Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds),
including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any
publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the
needs identified in the plan.
The 4th Street North and South Projects amounted to a public investment of $240,560. Through this
inital seed money plus the developer taking advantage of the Multifamily Tax Exemption Program the
developer was able to leverage over $8 million of private funding in the Fourth Street Project(s).
Without this start up, initiative -based funding, the developer has stated that this project would have
never occurred. The Weatherization and Minor Home Repair program funded at $27,990 was able to
leverage $573,000 in other federal grants, $141,700 in state grants, and $316,100 in Corporate
Contributions.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
CR -20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)
Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the
number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income,
moderate -income, and middle-income persons served.
Table 5- Number of Households
One -Year Goal
Actual
Number of homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units
Number of non -homeless households to
be provided affordable housing units
Number of special -needs households to
be provided affordable housing units
Total
Table 5- Number of Households
Table 6 - Number of Households Supported
Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting
these goals.
The City of Bremerton, like many other cities is in the midst of a shortage of affordable housing- both
subsidized and market -rate. The 2015 Washington State Affordable Housing Needs Assessment
estimates that there are only 12 units of affordable housing for every 100 units needed by people
earning less than 30% of Area Median Income. This results in 4,168 at 30% of AMI and 3,654 at 30%-50%
of AMI being cost burdened, spending more than 30% of their income on housing. In addition, 1,751
home -owner households at 30% of AMI and 2,082 at 30%-50% of AMI are cost burdened. These are the
households most at risk of housing instability and homelessness.
During the program year no new rental housing units were completed. However, the City provided
funding for Phase I facade improvement, Phase II of this project will rehab the interior of the building to
create rental units. 28 units in total will be created in Phase II and no CDBG funds will be used towards
Phase II. The City relies on non-profit and for profit affordable developers to produce new affordable
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
One -Year Goal
Actual
Number of households supported
through rental assistance
Number of households supported
through the production of new units
Number of households supported
4
10
through the rehab of existing units
Number of households supported
through the acquisition of existing units
Total
Table 6 - Number of Households Supported
Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting
these goals.
The City of Bremerton, like many other cities is in the midst of a shortage of affordable housing- both
subsidized and market -rate. The 2015 Washington State Affordable Housing Needs Assessment
estimates that there are only 12 units of affordable housing for every 100 units needed by people
earning less than 30% of Area Median Income. This results in 4,168 at 30% of AMI and 3,654 at 30%-50%
of AMI being cost burdened, spending more than 30% of their income on housing. In addition, 1,751
home -owner households at 30% of AMI and 2,082 at 30%-50% of AMI are cost burdened. These are the
households most at risk of housing instability and homelessness.
During the program year no new rental housing units were completed. However, the City provided
funding for Phase I facade improvement, Phase II of this project will rehab the interior of the building to
create rental units. 28 units in total will be created in Phase II and no CDBG funds will be used towards
Phase II. The City relies on non-profit and for profit affordable developers to produce new affordable
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
housing units. The overall annual entitlement amount generally is used as seed money to lead to the
completion of larger scale projects. However, the local resources are limited in the City of Bremerton
which makes it very difficult to develop new affordable housing. Obtaining financing for these projects
may take one to two years as the projects typically need allocations of other public resources including
State Housing Trust Funds and Low Income Housing Tax Credits, however due to Bremerton's size it has
not been competitive for Low Income Housing Tax Credits.
Rehab of Existing Units (Ownership and Rental): During the program year the City funded the rehab of 4
homes, of these homes 1 was a rental property. Due to a reallocation of '14 and '15 money Kitsap
Community Resources Weatherization program was able to service an additional 6 homes. This
alleviates some pressure on a few of those cost burdened renters and home owners who are unable to
make necessary repairs to their homes.
The City of Bremerton participates in the Coordinated Grant Application Process for use of the City's
HOME funds and Homeless Services & Homeless Capital Applications. Generally projects that house the
homeless are not funded with CDBG, but they are with Homeless Services & Homeless Capital funds. The
City has not utilized HOME funds to develop new units of affordable housing, but HOME funds have
been utilized to provide homeownership opportunities for lower income residents while eliminating
blighted 'zombie' structures throughout the City.
Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.
The goals stated by the City in the 5 year consolidated plan were based on estimates from the
community needs and market analysis that were conducted. Each year the City publishes a Notice of
Funding Availability (NOFA) to help determine the actual goals for action plans. This process aides in
meeting future stated goals.
Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income persons
served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine
the eligibility of the activity.
Number of Persons Served
CDBG Actual
HOME Actual
Extremely Low-income
12
0
Low-income
6
0
Moderate -income
1
0
Total
19
0
Table 7 — Number of Persons Served
Narrative Information
LMA projects take place in areas that are above 70% LMI.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
CR -25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c)
Evaluate the jurisdiction's progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending
homelessness through:
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their
individual needs
In 2011 Kitsap County implemented a coordinated entry program, the Housing Solutions Center, for all
homeless individuals and households, providing individualized assessment and referrals to appropriate
housing resources. It serves 99% of clients within 72 hours of contact. In addition, this program provides
outreach to unsheltered individuals in partnership with peer support community mental health workers.
In 2016 the Housing Solutions Center served 3,746 households (including 6,916 individuals), comprised
of 1,086 literally homeless households, 675 households imminently at risk of homelessness, 1,045
unstably housed, 851 stably housed, and 89 with an unknown housing status.
The new Kitsap Connect program works to identify the highest utilizers of emergency services, provide
behavioral health and physical health case management, and connections with housing and other
needed resources. This program is a truly successful collaboration accross multiple agencies including:
Kitsap Community Resources, Kitsap Mental Health Services, Bremerton Housing Authority, Kitsap Public
Health District, and Salvation Army. The Kitsap Rescue Mission programs include multiple community
meals, a day room program, mobile showers, and outreach to encampments and unsheltered
individuals. The Salvation Army's social services program provides two meals a day, hygiene services
(showers and laundry), as well as supplies for outdoor living.
Each year, inconjunction with the annual Point in Time Count survey, the Kitsap Continuum of Care
Coalition sponsors a Project Connect event with vendors providing services and information to over 500
low-income and homeless guests. Services provided include: hygiene kits, haircuts, diapers, vision
screenings, pet vaccinations, medical examis, immunizations, and a hot meal. Housing resources are also
offered, both directly and through connection with the coordinated entry program.
Kitsap uses the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS). This is a federally -mandated and
state -managed database of information that is required to be collected by homeless housing and service
providers about every client who receives homeless assistance provided by federal or state funding.
(Faith based or privately -funded programs are not required to participate, though in Kitsap several of
these programs choose to do so).
Homeless outreach is a priorty of the Kitsap Continuum of Care Coalition. In January 2016 an annual
point in time count was conducted by volunteers throughout the County. During this annual Point in
Time Count 658 individuals were counted -a 30% increase since last year. Of these numbers: 223 were in
families with children, and 62 were families with children. Of the Homeless Subpopulations, 127 suffer
from mental disability, 135 were victims of domestic violence, 133 were children (under 18) in families,
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
11
and 104 were physically disabled.
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
In the City of Bremerton, emergency shelters provide immediate relief from homelessness and the
opportunity for service providers to assess the needs of each individual. Transitional housing, with
supportive services, provides the time needed for a homeless household to get stabilized. While there
are two emergency shelters within the City, there is still a continuing shortage of emergency shelter
beds, creative short-term methods have been implemented, such as safe car parks, and severe weather
shelters.
• Kitsap's coordinated entry program, the Housing Solutions Center, includes a community -wide
emergency housing waiting list for shelter. At the end of 2016 the average number of days a
household (including families and individuals) spent on the waiting list for shelter was 9 days,
down from an average of 11 days in 2015. In 2016 Kitsap County's homeless housing inventory
included 113 residential emergency shelter beds (up to 90 days)-comrpised of shelters for
women with children, shelters for families, one shelter for men, and a shelter for survivors of
domestic violence.
• There are an additional 6 shelter beds dedicated for unaccompanied young adults. These shelter
programs also offer referrals to other community services. In December of 2016, an additional
52 night -by -night shelter beds at the Salvation Army were added through March 2017. Another
20 night -by -night shelter beds at the Kitsap Rescue Mission on anticipated to operate year
round.
• 94 transitional housing units provided housing for up to two years for families who need case
management and supports to regain self-sufficiency.
• Rapid rehousing programs serve as many households as possible within program and funding
constraints and the shortage of affordable housing units.
Kitsap adopted the use of Rapid Re -housing programs (supported by national studies) that provide a
brief and graduated subsidy to homeless households, placing them in permanent housing as quickly as
possible while providing short-term supportive services. This housing model has proven successful for
households with few barriers to self-reliance. Significant investments have been made in creating new
units of affordable housing through the Bremerton Housing Authority's Bay Vista Project, which
replaced the aging clustered subsidized housing units of the West Park projet with a mixed income
housing development.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely
low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after
being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care
facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections
programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
12
address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs
Housing and services are still needed for several homeless sub -populations to achieve stable housing.
Because of their special needs, these populations have little hope of regaining housing without
programs specifically geared to their needs. Chronically homeless individuals (particularly men) and
individuals re-entering the community from correctional facilities, jails, mental insitutions, foster care,
and hospitals remain extremely under -served, as there are not always housing options available or
adequate to address the unique needs of these populations. We need to further develop innovative,
evidence -based programs in order to move these sub -populations out of homelessness.
In 2016, homelessness prevention programs provided short-term rental assistance for eviction
prevention, as well as first/last/deposit funding for households with sufficient income to maintain
housing after these supports.
Kitsap Mental Health Services operates a program working with jail inmates with mental health issues
prior to discharge to coordinate their housing upon exit. In 2016 West Sound Treatment Center piloted a
program to work with people with substance abuse disorders who are exiting jails to successfully
transition to housing programs.
Homeless youth in the City of Bremerton have benefitted from improved accessibility to services by
Hope in Christ Ministries' Coffee Oasis programs, which include youth street outreach, drop-in centers,
juvenile justice programs, mental health programs, case management, job training, and a youth shelter.
Youth exiting foster care are served by the West Sound Youth for Christ Independent Living Specialist
program, which helps them make the transition to independent housing, however there are far more
foster youth who need this support than currently receive it. In 2016, this program supported 30 former
foster youth to maintain independent housing, supported with life -skills training. West Sound Treatment
Center is piloting a program for chemically dependent people re-entering the community from jail.
All of these programs that coordinate exits to stable housing from systems of care are not able to serve
all individuals in need of these services due to lack of funding resources.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families
with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to
permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that
individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals
and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were
recently homeless from becoming homeless again
Priority is given to making shelter stays as short as possible and utilizing rapid rehousing programs
whenever possible, as funding permits. Housing case management and early connections with
employment, education, and skill -building services assist households to increase self-sufficiency and
avoid future homelessness.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
13
Significant investments have been made in creating new units of affordable housing throughout the City.
Increasing access to private market units has recently become a focus; the Housing Solutions Center
Landlord Liasion Program works with local landlords to provide incentives for renting to "hard to serve"
households. Additional Housing Choice Vouchers for veterans were recently added to Bremerton
Housing Authority's portfolio, expanding the housing resources for veteran households.
Kitsap providers strive to reduce the number of households that return to homelessness after
graduating to permanent housing. In 2016 these households that returned to homelessness comprised
only 4.58% of the total number of households enrolled in homeless housing programs.
Housing alone is usually not enough to enable people to make this transition from homelessness to
stable housing. Supportive case management services provide assistance and skill building to overcome
the crises and dire circumstances that cause homelessness. Progress has been made in providing
supportive services in a variety of areas, such as legal services, job counseling, traning and placement,
homeless childcare, "ready to rent" classes, financial literacy classes, and behavioral health services.
However, expanded access to all of these services is needed to meet the demand.
Certain homeless populations require specific services or housing situations to be able to acquire and
sustain housing. Several programs exist to serve particular populations, such as veterans, youth, severely
mentally ill, those with chemical use disorders, and survivors of domestic violence. Several programs
work with homeless clients to get them into permanent housing as soon as possible. The Kitsap County
Consolidated Housing Authority's Housing Stabilization Program facilitates homeless household's access
to housing authority units with housing subsidies and case management. Kitsap Community Resources'
Rapid Rehousing Program provides short-term graduated subsidies and housing case management for
homeless families. Bremerton Housing Authority programs provide Section 8 vouchers for households
successfully transitioning to permanent housing.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
14
CR -30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
In 2016 the Bremerton Housing Authority took on the following activities:
• Provided rental assistance for 7 project -based Section 8 voucher units and 6 public housing
units. Wright Court is made up of two 3 bedroom single family dwellings and one 2 bedroom
single family dwellings. The remaining units will be duplexes with one unit is PBV and the other
as public housing subsidies.
• Acquired Casa del Sol, an 18 unit acquisition/rehab property which has six two bedroom units
and twelve one bedroom units. Rehabilitation will focus on creating ADA accessibility within the
building, weatherizing the deck spaces and upgrading the railings, upgrading community
facilities, sealcoating the parking lot and miscellaneous deferred maintenance items.
• Made it possible for 30,857 households to have a safe, decent, affordable place to live.
• Acquired the Charter House apartments maintianing affordable units of housing for seniors
• Sold 6 acres of land in the Bay Vista community (the site of the former Westpark public housing
project) to Peninsula Community Health Services for the future development of a community
health facility serving West Bremerton. This sale is partial fulfillment of the redevelopment
masterplan for Westpark in which a new mixed-use, mixed -income, mixed -housing type
neighborhood would be created.
Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in
management and participate in homeownership
The Bremerton Housing Authority has a ROSS coordinator. The coordinator prepares a monthly calendar
that is mailed out to all Public Housing residents. The calendar has all activities that BHA is sponsoring as
well as what is going on in the community. BHA does surveys to find out the needs of their community
and a lot of effort is put into education and employment. BHA offers a scholarship program at Olympic
College, and pays tuition and books for approved programs. There are currently 2 public housing and 2
Section 8 clients going to school. BHA has a computer lab and barista training program that is offered to
both programs. The ROSS coordinator does a lot of outreach to seniors living in housing that sets them
up with services to keep them independent in their homes, support with annual reviews and keeps their
other paperwork up to date. In some cases, helped them move. In the past few years BHA has helped 5
families purchase homes using a Section 8 vouchers. BHA has just recently begun offering a woman's
friendship group and a brownies/daisy troops for the kids. They are planning a computer rebuild
program in early summer for high school kids and a free lunch program is hosted at the Summit during
the summer.
The Bremerton Housing Authority particpates in the Family Self Sufficiency Program. This program helps
families establish goals, which could include homeownership, and identify barriers which could prevent
achievement of these goals. Once goals are defined, the family executes a FSS Contract of Participation
CAPER 15
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
with the Bremerton Housing Authority. The term of the contract is typically 5 years. The FSS program
assists the family in achieving those goals by coordinating the resources and services necessary. After a
contract is executed, BHA establishes an interest-bearing escrow account for that family. As the family
accesses the resources and services available through the program, the desired outcome is that the
familys earned income will increase. Any increases in the family's rent as a result of increased earned
income during the family's participation in the program results in a credit to the family's escrow account.
Once a family graduates from the program, they may access the escrow account and use it for any
purpose -including homeownership. BHA does not have any homeownership program for public housing,
but they do promote Habitat for Humanity and Housing Kitsap self-help housing programs.
Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs
Does not apply as the Bremerton Housing Authority is not a troubled PHA.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
16
CR -35 - Other Actions 91.220(j) -(k); 91.320(i) -(j)
Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as
barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning
ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the
return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i)
The City has committed to ameliorate any negative effects of public policies that could serve as barriers
to affordable housing by doing the following:
Support increased densitites and infill projects and the use of the Low Impact Development (LID)
techniques and Best Management Practices (BMPs) in order to capitalize on the cost efficiency of
utilization of existing utility services. Additionally, encourage maintenance of City services such as
sidewalks, bike lanes, parks, and utilities in order to enhance the overall affordability and health of the
community.
Encourage expanded availability of incentives for development within the City such as the Multifamily
Tax Exemption, Community Empowerment Zone, Historically Underutilized Business zone, etc.
Eliminate unnecessary regulatory impediments to the development of affordable housing.
Promote financial assistance for low and moderate incomes that assist in essential repairs to
substandard structures. Support private sector low interest loan programs for such repairs, combined
with public resources when available.
Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The City of Bremerton commits to ensuring that underserved needs are met, and will work towards the
following goals:
Disperse below market rate, publicly assisted, affordable, and rental housing throughout the City in a
way that accomodates Bremerton's fair share of the Countywide need. Disperse such housing
throughout the City to avoid concentrations in any particular area and encouraging development close
to employment and public transportation.
Provide opportunities for the production of new housing for all incomes, ages, and families types
through infill by stimulating growth of non-traditional housing types such as townhomes, carriage units,
accessory dwelling units, and duplexes in locations where they will seamlessly infill into the fabric of the
existing neighborhoods.
Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
Kitsap Community Resources, Community Frameworks, and the Bremerton Housing Authority continue
to use trained assessors and inspectors for special handling of the pre -1978 housing stock. In the City of
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
17
Bremerton, all housing projects funded with CDBG or HOME funds are required to complete the Lead
Safe Housing Rule checklist and follow proper procedures for housing built before 1978.
For single family housing programs, Kitsap Community Resource's Weatherizawtion staff are trained in
lead based paint education and lead safe work practices. Both agencies educate clients on lead facts and
hand out literature including the EPA pamphlet "Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home."
Contractors and crews working on pre -1978 homes are all trained and certified in lead safe work
practices and attend refresher courses. Both agencies have staff trained in the use of the Niton XRF Gun,
which assesses the level of lead in surfaces and does readings for other agencies.
The City requires a lead based paint hazard assessment on all properties receiving rehabilitation
assistance. The level of assessment depends on the activity.
• For rehabilitation under $5,000 per unit on properties built prior to 1978 the City requires a lead
based paint test on painted surfaces disturbed as part of the rehabilitation. If the painted area
disturbed contains a lead paint a clearance inspection by a State liscensed clearance inspector is
required to verify that no lead based paint hazards remain after the rehabilitation is completed.
The contractor performing the work needs to be HUD certified for lead safe work practices.
• For rehabilitation over $5,000 per unit on properties built prior to 1978 the City requires a lead
paint risk assessment by a State licensed lead paint risk assessor. If a painted area that is
disturbed contains lead paint a clearance inspection is required to verify no lead based paint
hazards remain after the rehabilitation is complete. If a paint hazard exists interim controls must
be used to remediate the lead hazards. A clearance inspection by a State liscensed clearance
inspector must be performed to confirm no lead hazards remain after the rehabilitation is
complete. In addition, for rehabilition exceeding $5,000 where lead hazards exist on the interior
the lad paint hazards must be abated by a State certified lead paint abatement contractor. A
clearance inspection by a State licensed clearance inspector must be performed to confirm no
lead hazards remain upon completion of the lead abatement.
Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty -level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The purpose of all the City of Bremerton's goals, objectives, and projects carried out in the 2016
program year and listed in the 2016 Year One Action Plan (refer to AP -20 and AP -35 in the 2016 year one
action plan) is aimed at reducing the number of families in poverty. The City of Bremerton strongly
supports the efforts of service providers in the community to end homelessness, help individuals gain
self-sufficiency, and provide affordable housing and economic development activities. The HUD CDBG
entitlement grant allows the City of Bremerton to invest at a minimum $400,000 annually to reduce the
number of poverty -level families.
Specifically the following actions were taken to achieve the anti -poverty goal:
Partially funded the BE$T program which assisted entreprenuers to begin, or sustain small businesses in
the community, helps small businesses generate more employment, and help small business owners get
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
18
assistance in marketing, social media, taxes, insurance, financial literacy, and licensing.
Provided funding for facade improvements which will lead to increased commercial space which allows
for more opportunities for employment.
Funded Weatherization and Minor Home repair programs for owners and renters. Often homeowners
and tenants face necessary repairs to their home which become very costly. Low income homeowners
and renters generally do not have the funds to make these necessary upgrades which occasionaly puts
the residents in an unsafe situation. This program provides assistance and focuses on the health and
safety of the home as well as conservation measures to assist in decreasing energy costs.
Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The City has pledged to improve coordinated, effective planning programs that improve access to
affordable housing. Specifically promote intergovermental cooperation and agreements that support
strategies and programs to achieve City housing goals.
Promote increased housing density to provide a broader customer base for more affordable public
services including utilities.
Eliminate unnecessary regulatory impediments to the development of affordable housing.
Promote private and public efforts to provide adequate capital for rehabilitation of housing projects;
such efforts should include commitments to remove or abate blighting influences near or within
residential areas.
Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service
agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The City creates strategic partnerships to enhance the availability of resources and leverage services
provided to low and moderate income residents and neighborhoods.
Annually the City, Bremerton Housing Authority, and Kitsap Continuum of Care Coalition sign a
'Consistency with the Consolidated Plan' document. This document ensures that activities taken
throughout the year are consistent with the strategic goals outlined in the Consolidated Plan.
Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the
jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a)
The City will begin its process to do a Fair Housing Assessment towards the end of the Consolidated Plan
timeframe. The last Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing took place in 2005.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
19
The City supports the Fair Housing Center of Washington. The mission of the Fair Housing Center of
Washington is to assure equal access to housing, and other related services to the residents of
Washington. The organization achieves this purpose through education, investigation, and enforcement
of applicable laws. The City provides information both on its website, through its Code Enforcement
Officer, and as requested for individuals who reside in the City and may have an allegation of
discrimination relating to a housing transaction. The Fair Housing Center of Washington then conducts
an intake to ensure that the housing issue relates specifically to a protected class under federal, state or
local fair housing laws.
The City has pledged through its Comprehensive Plan update to support efforts to provide for a variety
of housing options such as:
• Emergency group housing, homeless shelters and short term housing to meet the needs of the
lower income categories
• Respond to the special needs of the growing elderly population within the City. Encourage a full
range of housing options including retirement housing complexes in all residential zones
particularly in areas with direct proximity to services and amenities. Encourage programs which
allow elderly to remain in their homes as long as possible.
• Provide for integration of special needs housing within the community by allowing for
government -assisted housing, housing for low-income families, manufactured housing, group
homes, and foster care facilities.
• Encourage construction to meet and exceed ADA standards whenever possible.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
20
CR -40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance
of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs
involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning
requirements
Subrecipient monitoring for CDBG and HOME.
The City of Bremerton (as an entitlement grantee, and member of HOME Consotrium) is responsible for
monitoring its sub -recipients' and Kitsap County (as an Urban County, and Consortium lead agency) is
responsible for monitroing its sub -recipients' activities to ensure compliance with all applicable federal
requirements at 24 CFR 570, 24 CFR 576, and 24 CFR 92 for individual project goals, and local CDBG and
HOME program requirements. The City of Bremerton selects sub -recipients for CDBG program activities
and executes contracts for all funded activities. These contracts meet the applicable program and
federal requirements. The County executes HOME written agreements for sub -recipients, including sub -
recipients within the City of Bremerton and monitors projects funded within the HOME program. All
projects funded are reviewed for eligiblity and compliance by the CDBG administrator, and approved by
the Bremerton Cit Council prior to insertion in the Annual Action Plan.
The City monitors contracts for compliance with the specific program requiremernts applicable to the
project including: general management, performance goals, financial management, data collection,
reporting, eligibility determinations, environmental review, non-discrimination, minority business
outreach, and labor standards compliance, etc. The City of Bremerton also provides annual technical
assistance to interested applicants for CDBG funds to assure compliance with applicable federal
requrements. After a contract is executed, the City frequently conducts desk monitoring to ensure
continued regulatory compliance. This may include review of procurement processes, attendance at
pre -construction meetings to review project requirements with contractors, meetings to review specific
requirements, and assistance in creating bid documents.
A variety of monitoring techniques are used during the implementation of HUD funded activities by staff
to review sub -recipient compliance with federal regulations and the funding agreement. Through risk
assessment, phone conversations, written correspondence, desk monitoring, reviewing specific
requirements for each project, and on-site monitoring visits, staff is able to review each funded project
and program to ensure that the applicable CDBG and HOME program's regulatory requirements are
met. When necessary, the City of Bremerton will take corrective actions to preserve program integrety
with funded sub -recipients. Detailed information on the monitoring processes are outlined in the 2016
Policy Plan, and the City of Bremerton CDBG/HOME subrecipients manual.
Lastly, the City of Bremerton uses the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER)
as a tool for monitoring performance against the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan goals.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
21
Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)
Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to
comment on performance reports.
On March 15th, 2017 citizens were notified of the availability of the 2016 CAPER in the City's Official
Paper of Record, the Kitsap Sun. The notice informed the public of the 15 day public comment period.
The Community Development Block Grant Administrator notified the Bremerton City Council as well as
the public during a presentation on the March 15th, 2017 Bremerton City Council meeting. The 2016
CAPER, along with the following IDIS reports, PR03, PR05, PR07, PR23, PR26 and PR27 are posted on the
City of Bremerton's website. There were no written comments submitted during the 15 day public
comment period and there were no comments during the City Council meeting on March 15th.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
22
CR -45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction's program objectives
and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its
experiences.
For the 2016 Program Year, there were no changes to the City of Bremerton's program objectives that
were identified in the 2016 Action Plan. The City met its stated program objectives, please note that two
capital projects are still underway and are on schedule to meet stated goals and objectives.
Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI)
grants?
EC
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
23
Attachment
CDBG/HOME Loan Portfolio Summary
City of Bremerton
CABG/HOME Loan Portfolio Summary 12/3112016
PORTFOLIO BALANCES BY SERVICER
W ESTSTAR
CDBG 587,532.76 From WestStar year end report: 1/112016.1213112016
HOME 562.918.30 From WestStar year end report 11112016.1213112016
016 PORTFOLIO ACTIVITY
New CD8G/HOME Loans 5 `The City is Not Currently Awarding any new CDBGIHOME Loans
Loans paid of 569,206.83
Loans forgiven 'The City will be bringing a number of loans to be forgiven in 2017
Unrecoverable funds from
Foreclosures (Prior to 2016) $181.813,21 -Will be presented to Council as an Info -Only Item
TOTAL $ 69.206.83
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
32
TOTAL
5 150.451.06
WSHFC DPA
City Share
WSHFC Share
C08G
$ 15,000.00
S 5.000.00
HOME
S 3,338.00
$ 1.113.00
TOTAL
$ 20.000.00
CITY HELD
CDBG
S 45.274.40
HOME
S 3793322
TOTAL
S 83.207 62 x
GRAND TOTAL
S 251.996 68
016 PORTFOLIO ACTIVITY
New CD8G/HOME Loans 5 `The City is Not Currently Awarding any new CDBGIHOME Loans
Loans paid of 569,206.83
Loans forgiven 'The City will be bringing a number of loans to be forgiven in 2017
Unrecoverable funds from
Foreclosures (Prior to 2016) $181.813,21 -Will be presented to Council as an Info -Only Item
TOTAL $ 69.206.83
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
32
Minority Business Enterprise/Women Business Enterprise
Report
1. (:ranMRgm B.:I"" kFe Cbeek F 12 Loc4lwn [trty. $Yk
Ba �me�CeWxs Pnaeo
5arnh Achy l
ib. Pbooe �-rmOn (mclafejAm Cede.7
360-473-5375
�'tP�wB �� �
Io-; vlslA v1'
.` PmF�C.Cr /�-� Table for ClN pray�al
sK „r ...^,.w afCslernnnmdP.6e Uua
ups•n.Baer rn .a�a Fre6nm eed..
b. DAY SrbmlW bSeW
-0.w1.
Qin
.re Ay.ee\ xM.t)caa.0edwxaenr
wamre+em arm*pe�'. ugmwr:er ew.mtav,
•snma[
Ceeu.na
sueearean
3
T,p. NTeae.
tsr.aw.]
cmaav
kreeoeeee
Bvenne�
Ravl._-.
ts.. arrow}.
N'eeu Owed
9ereaar [rrrx
cel
Pee. ceeurna
rdaw<sa'.tID7.m•b«
•-"-eiw.exr
-- -.�fy
Sec. 3 ,�aeb..
Sec.3
Cveeraeta5ribomaxSa Nmu
7i.
aed Address.
1(x N'.rxnwm63361'
Name
Saes
ci
51�e
U.,cmi+nx�.�
5105,071
3
1
Ne
91.3307698
Brew Cooswcum
HSi SECwaS'uev Pe.e
Pen ar<evd
H -A
9t -id'
Bevxa cemarm}
$172.595
3
1
lea
91-19435'0
Nv
Glws Cala
1W Pfa A.rr..e
&.ate
W'
41Sr0
fn Hraen
5174,315
3
1
Yes
91`W3J7
Na
7r He
aro 3lm Sven
sr--
H -A
9143'
3[[Cawavvae
$157.595
3
]
Nv
91-}802:46
Nv
}fC L'aimuce9w
Pv 6e, 671
aw ncelbr
a:a
%Sta
AbwaEknir
521,713
3
1.
No
91.7065347
N.
.ahem Ek.-aie
q;,wo[eeen N'n•9ene[
6e7e>un
WA
9141:
ibrt ard.d
513,770
3
1
No
91.2035261
PettO d
il13 GayeAce2
Po,. ac�ure
WA
91486
a—c—
3
4
Yes
91-',92722
No
1&mtrsne
AO Bvr ]0a
PrnGwaae
N'A
P3;u
Carrerc
538,500
;
]
No
70.3136022
N'o
F.ax CmrveeeC
Po 6u!Y
a -A
91iW
LRS huh ltemwal5mkx
3
]
N.
27-0116555
NO
T&57rash Remd.J
PO Boa!:!3
�awr.mn
WA
E-l[Pre.,mrm
3
1
No
38.36508;2
E IPr.6—CLC
301 v E1Ln Sx.!O'a
Prw
WA
914
S�mn•WHhe
55.300
3
]
No
47-1776599
to
5ywy¢v Wdd—
MIS&ml Qv6
K�rem
H'.i
Alsid
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
33
Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area Map
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
34
PR03, PR05, PR07, PR23, PR26
RSMenrnT
H
U Department of Housing and Urban Development Date:
03 -Mar -2017
1
Of c:P of [mmmumin Planning snrf De!re'al^,ment -rime,
14r05
.yn¢� III■I�1
*r,�
I iI fpD
AT B`Uur 5Br11 Pit 19I -I I rif or nlr)li oil Sv5enl Page:
1
Ac Ivily 6Ummaty Pi poli (UPH) lar Program Year 2016
BPEVEFETON
PGM Year: 20I i
Project: OC::: •,•Jnk: I,,:,k
I DIS Activity: 422-W,t.,• r':r
Status
0111—tive: Create suitable living environments
Location: c::::.1 F IC
1 Cus::lme: Availabilitylaoce55ibility
Matrix Code: Parks, Recreational Facilities {031`) National Objective:
LMA
Initial Funding Date: 0910512013
13—upt—u
C^,nnsuueu;.ln (sl nark in Nies[ 6rern aii,ri
indudirlp larldsra❑ing, pradinp. bene -es. picnic tables.
MI, V,-rerr. ae.d 151815 firm Prr k:: rilrM trIM7 amlllr_!
ihr pra,Fct rail �n Frnn Fie by AllOsr
k ie -un "' it le delay �, due 1. a delayed Start and longer lead little on nrarenal :
Tn Ja , wer 2T4q ;r rhe. $170,650 project budget has
been expanded on perm:r.I - g, equipment. rental and marerials.
Finanriny
'-nd Type Grant Year
Grant Funded Amount brawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year
Pre -2015
$163,585.69 $0.00
$0.00
••r'•l 2012
B12MC530D11 so. DD
$1,215.49
G❑fs:, 2614
614MC530011 $17905.35
$162,37029
-'
$0,476.45 $1,334,07
56,476.45
Total Total
$172,062.14 539,239.42
$172,1162.14
Proposed Accomplishments
PIll11 , Fn•. hi,-, 7
Tnt, Pop, '-nruv i Area: 34,459
Censu: Traci Herren[ L— I Mpd: 50-60
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative
# Bewefitting
2013 C-,pleL,d NEPA review
2014 P :. Ir l :::u:. p Irl rip. ,I.i"' c :
..,, I . r. ,v..r _uly 31, 2015
2015 Comp etc Inst i iu.n r.l •:a1 :'::.::I:
r 111' r.d 1 c-1:-csen 111 c:.,:; ..rens=rty hne. Awaiting estab I::I—ent of lawn to install trees on
newly h,rnrlst .rl t ;I rte r , ..
p ' l- : _:. k :3e-�eduled planting cf sho•eli-e 1;, �k with natio= plants and live
stake wd r. •r L11 it l -.: 11et l u y
r q F - -�.1 n DA :acct- 1. 1"SII - niti i❑ park.
2016 Trees -, d pAui in �. k1t:e , re II I
111:)'[.._.:.e_f n n. I1:LL..; ru 1_ . :�11: ::1.:n e•: a6lished. Ph,,[ I'le ak—l a"rI h„ale in,', led in the bid.
:lal n ': .1'n •l a
, I, —d n:cne 11, ;'tc rr n^ dank
❑nn atld renal Ilam --ir. 1, dei a I -r I•:'r al r ;•, a on 71 Jl l'i I ne houn...nr;: an.- tilltop of the
SiCpe A publi 0 IraP.cll 110L
s'. ,; Ile I.In 201h J L:al lr, ll I, 1-:111 of Lilo awi J� nes :`a ke1 rark.
PR03 - BRQNB3TOfV Page: 1 -o-f-2- 1
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
35
RzwenrnF U.S. Depar[men: o- Hnusing and Ji bar. Dere opment
der IIhII` COs Of• opt of Commmni[y fXanring and Delle.opment
n I - Irlre[ 3i r:^ fTS:lurSenlPnl alrl Inf[?(i-nxi.ln em
* IIIIIIII * WBG Activity Sunrrnary Hepprt (GPHj for Ffiogram Year 2016
BHEM14UON
.E•.! i, FY'c
PCM Year; 2014
Project- 0003 - Weathen7ation and Related Repair
1015 Activity: 432 - Weathetzatiett and Related Repair
Status: Open
Drawn Thru Program Year
Lucation. 2529 Sheridan Rd
Bremerton, WA 85310.5230
Inibat Funding Date:
07/3112014
Descriptikon:
$13.747.71
Weadlerization and Related Repair
574.665,00
Financing
Total
Fend Type
Gram Year Grant
White:
-Cr15
CDBG
R13MC53O011
0 14
0
Total Tonal
SlacIdAfrican American
Proposeil Ar. cnniplistimr•.ncs
0
Haus.ng lr c, .
0 0
Actual Accomphshmants
0 C
Objective: Create suirable living environments
rvlautt Ccrl;: C-.cgly ion, ry Improvements (14F)
Date: 03 -Mar -2017
Time: 14:45
Page: a
National Ohjective: LMH
Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year
Drawn Thru Program Year
$1&4,665 Or $0.00.
_. $0.00
$O. DO
$65,917.29
$0.00.,.
$13.747.71
564,665.00 $0.00
574.665,00
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
36
owner
Renter
TOW
Person
Number assrstetl.
Total
Hispanic
Total Hispanic
Total
Hispanic
Total Hispanic
White:
113
0
0
0 14
0
4 C
SlacIdAfrican American
0
0
0
0 0
0
0 C
Asian:
1
0
0
0 1
0
0 C
Americarnlndfa,;-1i
0
0
0
0 0
0
0 C
Ratios Ha,va, i<••::'[.•.:;. ! ._ . L.I.,..,J;
6
0
0
0 4
0
0 C
nnerica� L.;;::-�naeka� r�uiee:4'v;Ilne
0
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
. an"Ai' -
a
a
o
0 0
0
0 C
glaLi,ii. -%rierican&White:
0
a
0
0 0
0
0 C
Arris, • h. Akan Native & BlacklAfrican American:
0
0
0
0 0
0
0 C
Other rnur,. racial.
1
0
o
0 1
0
0 C
AsianlPacific Islander:
0
0
0
0 0
0
0 C
Hispanic
0
0
0
0 0
0
0 C
Total:
12
0
0
0 12
a
0 0
---- -- --- ----- ----- --- -- ---- -- --- ----- ----- ----- --- -- ---- --
PRO3 - BREME RTON
--- ----- -----
--- -- ---- --
---- -- --- ----- -----
--- -- ---- -- ----
-- --- ----- -----
--- -- ---- -- --- ----- ----- ----- --- -- ---- -
Page: 2 of 21
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
36
RzwenrnF U.S. Depar[men: o' Housing and Jrhar. Dere Dpment Date: 03 -Mar -2017
der IIhII� yOs Or op: of Community f1gnreng nnrt Delle.opment Time: 14:45
°' * * Integratrr: ❑smusentenl aul IntOmla:i.-.n5y5tett'I Page! 3
IIIIIIII
CABG Activity Summary Heport (GF'Hj for Ffiogram Year 2016
OPEME}'ifON
Gn'6gg r, F� 6'pe
Female -headed Households: 1
Income Category,
owner
Renter
Total
Person
Extremely Law
4
0
4
0
Low Mod
S
0
a
0
Moderate
0
0
0
0
Non Low Moderate
D
0
0
0
Total
12
0
12
0
Percent LowfMod
100A95
100.095
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative ifBenefitting
2014 KCR has provided a full spectrum of weathedzation and related repairs to 11 Bremerton homeowner occupied homes.
- -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - — - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - -
PRO3 - BREME RTON Page: 3 of 21
CAPER 37
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF U.S. Depanmen: o- Hnueing and Ji ban. Dere opment
der IIhII` COs Of' opt of Community fXanreng and Delle.opment
n I - IrSte[ 3i r:^ fT5:7ur5enlPnl :3.lrl Iflf[?n71a:i.ln 2m
* IIIIIIII * CDBG Aclivity Sumrnary Pr pori ((34PH) for Ffiogram Year 2016
BPEMETiti-ON
.E•N i. FY'c
PCM Year: 2014
Project- ODD4 - West Hills Pre -School
1015 Activity: 433 - Constructron- West Hills Pre -School
Status: Open
Location. 520 5 Nation! Ave Bremenan, WA 9a3123660
hill Funding Date: 1WI512015
Description:
Construction• West Hills Pre-school
Financing
Objective: Create suitable living environmerns
Outcome= Availabirrtylaccessibility,
Matrix Code: Public FaciPities and Improvement
(General) (03)
Crn:. Ti t
Annual Accomplishmrntr
No data returned ror the view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data
Date: 03 -Mar -2017
Time: 14:45
Page: 4
National Objective: Lr,AA
Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year
$000 $0.00
357,404.68 $67,045.79
$57,404.88 $67,045.74
- -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - – - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - -
PRO3 - BREMERTON Page: 4 of 21
CAPER 38
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Fund Type Grant Year Grant
Funded Amount
Cl
EN Pr,2015
$139563.25
2014 514MC530D11
Total
Total
$133,663.25
Propase,l A—ruiptishmenie
Pi::I •. F:i..
iiir-, 1
To: :. P:"•'::ii
'ino.n. in S—re Arra45.205
Crn:. Ti t
Annual Accomplishmrntr
No data returned ror the view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data
Date: 03 -Mar -2017
Time: 14:45
Page: 4
National Objective: Lr,AA
Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year
$000 $0.00
357,404.68 $67,045.79
$57,404.88 $67,045.74
- -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - – - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - – - - - - – - - - - – -- - - - - -- - -
PRO3 - BREMERTON Page: 4 of 21
CAPER 38
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF
IJS. Depanmen: o- Hnusing and Jrhal-.
Dere opment
Date:
03 -Mar -2017
der °s
Or op: of Community Flgnring nnri
Delle.opment
Time:
14:45
IIhII`
n * I *
Inte[jrat rn fl s:lursenlenl a.1rl Int(,ri
lnxiln5y5teM
Page:
5
WBG RGlivity Suntrnary Prpurt (GF'Hj for
IIIIIIII
Ffiogram Year 2016
G�6A'!
BREME iTON
,FY'VSe
PCM rear: 2014
Project: 0611 - I Pn, mf9^t M.^:
YDIS Activity,: 4�! -:.�.. • r:,tyr.. r,.-:::..:i:'..;r,.a.
Status: CC,I, rod;);?t*S: i:lb t2 C AM
Objective:
Crealeeconomic opportunities
Location. 345 54h 5t 5te 500 Suite OCO Bremerton, WA 953374873 Outeume:
Susiatnability
Matrix Code:
Direct Hamewmership Assistance
National
Ohjeetive:
LMH
(13)
Initial Funding Date: 02/0212015
Description:
City of Bremerton DPA program provides up to $15.000 loan to qualifying first-time homebuyers.
City RFP in progress for activity delivery contractor selection.
Financing
Fund Type Grant Year
Grant Funded Amount
Drawn M Program Year
Drawn Thou Program
Year
1
$15,000.00
$0.Oo
$0.06
CDBG EN
2014
514MC530011
$0.00
$15,000.06
Total Total
S15.000.00
Si
515,000A0
Proposed Accampushri
Housenon5 (i,ene•all
Actual Accomplishments
owner
Renter
Total
Person
Number assisted
Totgl Hispanic
Tatel Hispanic
Total Hispanic
Total
Hispanic
While:
1 0
0 0
1
0
0 C
BlackfAhican American
6 0
0 0
0
6
0 C
Asian:
6 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
American IndanfAlaskan Native
6 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
Native HawaiianlOther Pacific Islander:
0 0
0 0
0
0
6 C
American IndiaNAlaskan Naive & White:
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
Asian White:
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
BlackJAfdcan American & White:
6 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
American IndianiAlaskan Native & BiacklAfricalt American: 0 0
0 0
0
0
6 C
Other multi -racial:
6 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
Asian/Pacific Islander:
6 0
6 0
0
0
0 C
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
Total:
1 a
a 0
1
0
0 a
--------- ----- ------------------- ----- ----- -----
I - BREMERTON
-------------- ----- -------------------------
----- -------------------------
-----
-------------------
-----
Page:
----- ----- ----------
5 of 21
CAPER 39
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF U.S. Depar[men: o' Housing and Ji bar. Dere Dpment Date: 03 -Mar -2017
der IIhII� yOs Or op: of Cmmnuoniry fXanring nnr Delle.opmew, Time: 14:45
°' * * Integratrr: ❑smusentenl aul IntOrma:i.-.n5y5tern Page! 6
IIIIIIII
CABG Activity Summary Heport (GPftj for Ffiogram Year 2016
OPEME}'ifON
Gn'6gg r, F� 6'pe
Female -headed Households: u
Income Category,
owner
Renter
Total
Person
Extremely Law
1
0
1
0
Low Moe
0
0
0
0
Moderate
0
0
0
0
Non Low Moderate
0
0
0
0
Total
1
0
1
0
Percent LowfMod
100A95
100.095
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative ifBenefitting
2015 One DPA loan was made in 2015 in the amount of $15,000. The program allowed a low income elderly female to purchase a home in the
Bremenon City Limits, the home was closed en October 9, 2015.
..----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRO3 - BREMERTON Page: 6 of 21
CAPER 40
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF U.S. Department o- Housing and Ji bar. De-de opment
Date:
03-Mar-2017
der
°s Or'te c' Community Flanrdng nnr Delle.opmew,
Time:
14:45
n *
IIhII`
I * Interjrat rn fTsaurSenlenl alrl InfUr77a:iln 5y5t2tp
Page:
7
IIIIIIII
MISS RGlivity Summary Hrport (C441) for Ffiogram Year, 2016
G�6A'!
BPEMERTON
,FY'VSe
PCM Year: 2015
Project: OK4 - Vd-thrri-lion rind Vror H,r, Rnnair
1015 Activity: 443 - Weatherization and Minor Home Repa6r
Status: Open Objective: Provide decent affordable housing
Lai 154 St4VM Circle C1r 8remenon, WA 98312.8840 OWED—
Mac- Cad, f r.cgly Ff' ci, ry Improvements
(14F)
National Objective:
LMH
Initial Funding Date: 07/3112015
Descn Ation;
V; rz.'. ^r:nz Nx and minor home repair for t -income household,
Prop con hull!, re rerl!:cr he2,!ng rusts to, In-ro-inrnrlr families. p tical^^'d for The elderly. people with disabilifles, and children by improving the energy ef5ciency at their
homes,
adLbessn r� -i Lrlu• I lure !epan • '.•:I rte i•'sn i•rp :i reit I i=al [I l ora: saiFty
TI ie r•rl r. v'ii r.rn401 T, c: i w -ar make a p.A;,,,v^ cola r o n:=. r,vices ,l i n Ien_r •:ed.
I h2 3 .Vl Ili �n ,;d,I LI • V I Il r '-,i S.-t. (d]fli e Ehls foI u,, iv--al-: -.'Izat.Ori participant.
Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount
Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program
Year
Pre-2015 $19,855.88
So. DO.
60.00
CDOG EN 2014 B14MC530011
$0.60
$0.00
2015 B15MC530D11 598,402.19
50. DO
$98,402.19
PI $144.32
$0.00
Tata) ...Totak 8118.402.18
,$0.00.....
30.D0
888,402.18
Proposed Accomplishments
Housing Units: 17
Actual Accomplishments
Owner Reiner
Tinel
Person
Number assisted:
Total Hispanic Total Hispanic
Total Hispanic
ToEel Hispanic
White. 12 0 0 0
12
0 0 0
Black+African An 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
Asian: O 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
American IndkWAlaskan Nati 0 0 0 0
0
0 D 0
Native HawaiiaNOtber Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0
0
0 6 0
Ameri� IndianlAlaskan Native & White: 1 0 0 0
1
0 0 0
Asian White: 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
BlacklAhican American & White: 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
Amer6can IndianlAlaskan Native & BlacltlAfriean American: 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
Other mu1G-racial: 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
PRO3 - BREMERTON
Page:
7 of 21
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
41
RzwenrnF U.S. Depar[men: o- Housing and Ji Fan Dere Dpment
Date:
03 -Mar -2017
der
°s Or op: of C.nmmuni[y fXanring niI Delle.opment
Tinte:
14:45
n *
IIhII`
I * Interjrat rn fTsaurSenlenl aIrl Int(,rn1xiln5y5tenn
Page:
8
IIIIIIII
WBG Activity Summary Prpor4 (GF'Hj for Ffiogram Year 2016
G�6A'!
BREMERTON
,FY'VSe
AslanlPacr4c Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
Hispanic 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
Total: 13 0 0 0 13 0
0
0
Femate•headed Households: 5 0 5
Income Category
Owner Renter Total Person
Extremely Low 5 0 5 0
Low Mad 5 0 5 0
Moderate 3 0 3 0
Non Low Moderate o a 0 0
Total 13 0 13 0
Percent LowlMod 100.0% 100.095
Annual Accomplishments
Years Acramplishn—t Narratrve
#9eneTitting
2015 R�4s vera: h;1- It! pro rare reduced heatinc cr;ts for fo-inoome heasrngs, paruculi,, y for the eIde y peep v -h drsandiUes. and children
b la o' i'.g rl n I, -0'10y eft rir"-n of thea hnr— n9dressisp minor home rcm s t hdc nsn. my the r: -.r-.. r and nfr:} KC;R
seas nr-ded
52,1 00r•. •..,rcu.:n d ccnu d_I di I e;1':1 eit f-�i I- _.V A. 'u IIIwq;indlly z 'dI ,t d tL th ,r:� -FI HJsmU I I -nice Ccriru -: Ji 1.
L;e::ai=e Jt dtis
contract amen-ircnf. IL L:4 .: t: nhln it :rrn. .: ❑dr.itinndl hJr�u:hnld; nt thn ��: arl l rr.n�nl hra,r hr,l l.v n��c .n.. c dc'r Lr.t-a rrc
di ;aP:ITd. C}f
those, 2 repair, Ew . net e - y epa rr. t , i eplacement of a heal system rl - to v:irI It if rep acencM
..----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PR03 - BREMERTON Page: 8 of 21
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
42
RzwenrnF U -S. Del o- Hnueing and Ji ban. Dere opment
Date: 03 -Mar -2017
der
°s Or to of Communi[y fXanreng nnr Delle.opmew
Time: 14:45
n *
IIhII`
I * Integral rn fl s:wrsenlenl alrl Intori11xiln5y5tem
Page: 9
IIIIIIII
WBG A•Glivity Summary Rrpor4 (GF'H) for Ffiogram Year 2016
BREMERTON
PCM Yal 2015
Project: OWN -.S m:e :':'Fst Hia; Pre -School
IDIS Activity: 444 - Save West kills Pre -School
Status: Open Objective: Create suitable living environments
Lueativn. 845&h St Bremerton, WA 88337.1517 Outwri Availabirtrylaccessi4iliry
Matrix Code: Public Facilities and Improvement
National Ohjeetive: LMA
(General) (03)
bipat Funding Date: 1012 212 0 1 5
Descriptlon:
Build a new, replacement pre-school Classroom for children enrolled in Head Start and Early Childhood HdoCBtlon Assistance Program.
Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year
EN 2015 B15MC530011 $76803. 92
$76,803. 92. S76803.92
Cl
PI $817.08
$817.08 $817,08
Total Total $77,621.00
577,821.00 S77,621.0(1
Prupasert A—rinptishments
Pi. :l •: P:r:. ries : 2
T,r'.:': P::•':: ii 'i non in Snrvire Arro4,R30
:.r:n :. ': Ti:t::-r.,,.�.._ l .,:; - P.I:... 6 :'2
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative
# Benefitting
2015 Ccrip.eled dawn+qs and filed for permits with Kirsap County-
13M,i in, u7 liti-
- e•l sau•k u' szlecli^y su lb-coglraclors
S�gn•s1 c nntrrv. r;nh bn:a rho, c:rrhitect and general cuntracior
Hired CiuiO Engimeeiing Company
- -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - — - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - — - - - - — - - - - — -- - - - - -- - -
PRO3 - BREMERTON Page: 9 of 21
CAPER 43
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF
U.S. Department o- HDusing and Ji ban. DereDpment
der
COs
Of' opt of Community I'lanring nnr Dewe.opmew
n
* IIhII`
I -
*
IrSte[ 3t rr: fTS:lurSenlPnl •3.lrl Inf[?n71a:i.ln eIp
IIIIIIII
CUBG Activity Sunlrnary HPort (G -H) for Ffiogram Year 2016
GT6A,;
BREME iTON
cFY'r.,Ae
PCM rear: 2015
Project: oNq - D—n Pnymenf A,5:-xce
Actual Accomplishments
1015 Activity: 448 - )own Pa,m— Assistance
Status: Canceled g1220016 4:34:24 PM
Objective: Create suitable living erwonmerns
Locativ, 1000 2nd Ave 42700 Startle, WA
8a104 Outcome: Affordability
Matrix Code: Direct Hamemmership Assistance
(13)
WOW Funding Date: 08/0312015
Descriptkon:
Dem,npayment assistance through the Washington stere Housing Finance Commission.
Financing
No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied fiber excludes all data -
Date: 03 -Mar -2017
Time: 14:05
Page: 10
National Ohjeetive: LMH
Proposed Accomplishments
Households (General) : 32
Actual Accomplishments
Owner
Renter
Total
Person
Number assisted:
Total
Hispanic
Total
Hispanic
Total
Hispanic
Total
Hispanic
P
White:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BlaclriAfrican American.
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
Asian:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
American IndianlNaskan Native
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Native Hnnm+inn.'t7rher Pnn;..c Islander:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
America, ln,,—; A,: -kit:. h.a[rve &White:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.4:nn 'aril ite:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
fs,nrk+A'nCan American A white:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Amr,,nc In:^in,A'n=kn- Kntive & SlacklAfrican American:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other rnw.r-racisP.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Asian/Paciec Islander:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
..----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PR03 - BREME RTON
Page: ID of 21
CAPER 44
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF
U-S. Depar[men: o- HDusing and Ji Fan Dere Dpment
Date:
03-Mar-2017
der °s
Or'te of C.nmmuniry 1-1mring nnr Delle.opment
Time,
14:45
n I -
IIhII`
Irlte[ 3t rr: fTsaur5en7Pnl alrl Int[?rma:i.ln ern
Syst
Page! g .:
ll.
IIIIIIII -
WBG Acclivity Summary Heport (GPftj for Ffiogram Year 2016
G�6A'!
BPEMERTON
,FY'VSe
Hispanic
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
Total:
a 0 a a 0 a
0 0
Pemate-Watled Mausehol®s�
0 0 ♦}
Income Category
Owner
Renter
Total Person
Extremely Low
0
0
0 0
Low Mod
0
0
0 0
Mod-grate
0
0
0 0
Non Low h[cder ILI
0
0
0 0
Total
0
0
0 0
Percent Lova Mod
Anmtal Accomplishrients
No data return-2c 'nr ,r s v anv. This
might be
because the applied fiber excludes all data.
--------- ----- -------------------
PRO3 - BREMERTON
-----
-----
------------------- ----- ------------------------- ----- ------------------------- ----- -----
-------------- -----
Page:
----- ---------------
11 of 21
CAPER 45
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RZMervrnF
c4*11111111*g'
Gn'6gg r, F� 6'pe
PCM Year: 2016
Project: 0001- CDBG Administration
1015 Activity: 449 - CDBG Administration
Status: Open
Location:
U.S. Depar[men: o- Hnusing and Ji bar. Dere opment
Or oe n' Community Flgnrii anr3 Delle.opment
IrSregrarrr: ❑5mu5enlPnl a.lrl Inf[�n71a:i0nSy5ieRl
WBS Activity Summary Hrport (GPH) for Diagram Year 2016
BHEMERTION
Initial Funding Date: 08/1712016
Description:
General Program Administration for the CDBG program.
Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant
2015 Bv5tuC5300ii
CDBG EN 2016—I B16MC5300I1
PI
Tota) Tota{
Proposed Accomptishments
ACt4al ACCornpliShinentS
Objective:
Outcome=
Matrix Code: General Program Administration (ZIA)
Date: 03 -Mar -2017
Tinte: 14:45
Page: 12
National Objective:
Funded Amount
Drawn In Program Year
Drawn Thru Program Year
$495 07
"5.07
$495 07
$75 666.31
$75.660.31
$75,666.31
$15,643.04
$15,643.04
$15,643.04
ig1,W4A2
S9i1,t1I
191304A2
CAPER 46
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Omer Renter
Total
Person
V'r, glh2� 8S5r$i 6`d
Total Hispanic Total Hispanic Total
Hispanic
Total Hispanic
`^.shite'
D
0
lack-Wrican American,
0
0
.s an.
0
0
r,ned;a• lndia,W%Ia,ka,Datwe.
0
0
r,ati.e Ha9b:ia^,;Jthe! I:=.7c Islander:
0
0
i,•tt ri^r,n IndiaNAlaskan Native & White:
0
0
.s an vhite:
0
0
L,:eu k: rd• can rate -san & White:
0
0
Am, -Co,' hwiar: ,askan Dative& BlacklAftican American:
0
0
Otho rLl'-rcrdal.
0
0
Asienlpaa',c Islander,
0
0
Hispanic:
0
0
Total.-
0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0
Female -headed Households:0
PROS - BREMERTON
Page: 12 of 21
CAPER 46
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF U -S. Depar[men: o- Housing and Ji Fan Dere Dpment Date: 03 -Mar -2017
der IIhII` °s Of opt of Communi[y 1-1mring nnr Delle.opmew Time: 14:45
n I - Inte[ 3t rr: fTsaur5en7Pnl alrl Int[?rnla:i.ln ern Pa1,3
Syst Page! .:
IIIIIIII - CABG Acclivity Summary Heport (GRRj for Ffiogram Year 2016
BREMERTON
Gn'6gg r, F� 6'pe
income Category.
Owner Renter Tolal Person
Extremely Law 9
Low Mod 0
Moderate 0
Non Low Moderate 0
Total 0 0 0 0
Percent LowrMod
Annual Accomplishments
No data returned for this view, This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.
--------- ----- ------------------- ----- ----- ------------------- ----- ----- -------------------- ----- ------------------------- ----- ------------------- ----- ----- ---------------
PRO3 - BREMERTON Page: 13 of 21
CAPER 47
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF U.S. Department o- Hnusing and Ji ban. Dere opment
Date: 03 -Mar -2017
der °s Or'te of C.nmmunity fXanring and Delle:opment
Tinle, 14:45
n I - Inte[13t rn fTs:lur5enlenl alrl Infnrllxi'.ln eM
IIhII` Syst
g p .: 1
Page!
IIIIIIII- WBG Activity Sunllnary Nrport (CRR) for rfiagram Year 2016
BREMgZTON
PCM Year: 2016
Project: ODD2 -4th Street North -Facade
1015 Acavity: 450 - 40 Street North -Facade
Status: Open Objective: Creale suitable living environments
Location: 423 Pacific Ave Suite 402 Bremerton. WA 98337.1940 Outeume: Avallabirrty1dQQessib1lity
Matrix Code: Rehab; Publicly or Privately -Owned
National Ot4wrve: LMA
Commerciallinduslrial (14E)
initial Funding Date: 08/1712016
Description:
Th —i eget.: fully funded the facade improvement for one par,o of property that has stood vacant for aver 25 years.
V:`l�ll "' ".;IJ Ili �h�ry �haSP IS ft?IlllietP ? fl Ill t'!"t'I�1nrPll� tl l�^.fPd ARfI�:P ' t�.i. hPff In
F" .�.se roll k,[d W I, a rgre;:r. tl cu rl i•leru d1,1r .e as w I a_ 28 n:-, h_ Pin" Lill IS, if III '.L'"�'. s• II hF Iiai I- d r Johl
This initial public investment of 4;96.629 has led to a total private irivcsnnenc in this (and other Pi0Jccis Gin 4Th street) of $8 million.
Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year
CUSG EN 2016 B16MC530011 $196,629.00 $0.00 $0.00
Taw Total $196,629.D6 SO.DO SI'1.110
Proposed Accomplishments
Businesses: 3
Total Population in service Area: 2,705
Census Tract Percent Low I Med: 7227
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative 11 Bar1efrtlinq
2016 Pacade improved on one chronically vacant building during Phase I. Completion of Phase I will lead to a fully privately funded Phase ll which will
construct housing units (20% affordable) and 5,000 sq It of commercirll space. This project. which was funded at $196,629 led to a private
investment of S8 million in bath acquisition and rehab of vacant buildings
- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - -
PRO3 - BREMERTON Page: 14 of 21
CAPER 48
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF
U.S. Department o- Hnusing and Ji balr. Dere opment
Date:
03 -Mar -2017
der °s
Of t:2 of C.nmmuni[y Flgnring and Delle.opmew,
Time:
14:45
IIhII`
n * I *
Inte[jrat rn fTsaurSenlenl alrl IntUn77a:iln5y5tem
Page:
15
WBG RGlivity Summary Prpor4 (GF'H) for Ffiogram Year 2016
IIIIIIII
G�6A'!
BREMERTON
,FY'VSe
PCM Yaw; 2016
project- 0003 - 4th Street South -Blight
1015 Activity: 451 - 40 Street Seut"light
Status: Open
Objective: Create economic opportunities
Lueation: 2784th St Bremedan, WA 88337.1812
Outeume: AvailabirrtylaccessibBty
Mavix Code: Rehab; Publicly or Prvately-Owned
National Objective:
SBA
Commerciallfnduslrial [14E)
Initial Funding Date: 08/1712016
Description:
Financing
Fund Type Grant Year
Grant Funded Amount prawn In Program Year Drawn Thm Program
Year
COBG EN 2016
13161VIC530011 $43,931.00
$0.00
50.00
Total Total
$43,031.00
$0.00
$OAO
Proposed Accomplishments
Businesses: 1
Annual Accomplishments
No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data
---- -- --- - ----- - ----- - --- -- ---- -- --- - ----- - ----- - ----- - --- -- ---- -- --- - ----- - ----- - --- -- ---- -- ---- -- --- - ----- - ----- - --- -- ---- -- ---- -- --- - ----- - ----- - --- -- ---- -- --- - ----- - ----- - ----- - --- -- ---- -
PRO3 - BREMERTON Page: 15 of 21
CAPER 49
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
.c,
U.S. Deparrmen: o` Housing and Ji ban. Dere opment
Date:
03-Mar-2017
der
COs
Or op: of C.nmmuni[y Flgnreng and Delle.opment
Time:
14:05
x IIhII`
I *
Integratrr. fls:wrsen+ertl and Int(,(nnxi.'n5ystem
Page:
16
11111111
-
CUBG Ac(ivity Summary Hr Pori (G-H) for Ffiogram
Year 2016
G�6A'!
BHEME}'ZTON
,FY'VSe
PCM Yaw; 2016
Project: 0004 - Kitsap Community Resources-Business Education Support and Training
1015 Activity: 452 - BEST
Status: Open
Objective:
Create economic opportunities
Location. 845 Bth St Bremerton, WA 88337.1517 Outeume:
Susiafnability
Matrix Code:
Micro-Enterprise Assistance (1aC)
National Ohjeetive:
LMC
Initial Funding Gate: 08/1712016
Description:
The Business Education S. pport and Trainrrlq
Program wrnks to create. srarr and launch businesses in the Cry of Bremerton.
Tho PmphAFic of th S nrnrJrn m;; in'1S.
r
10 10 I1 1M h thy- JP11I,nn of qi,n pin line ^t Onll n^Il"III
.S '15 NPI .l= I'P.r:l l^Ing
and sustaining businesses
in the cnmmunity.
*: ., c.Il - a•.ru •.. _: n y Maes all _, ..I
-
I V .. "1 .,. L, I� w dlw ( "di a a11_ rahc•
a e _1 &.du ,Ied , ,r1
.11e eight-week training
class to
assist in keep rg
their husinesses
npc-. antl suc-�•sful.
Financing
Fund Type„r1
dell nn uu•...
Drawn In Program Year
Drawn Thru Program Year
EN
:'()lfi H16MC511CA]
55:.7.1:.85
$24219.07
$24,219..07
CDBG
PI
512,95$15
$12,954.15
$12,954.15
Total Tota!
$65,896.00
$37,173.1.8
$37,113.22
Proposed Accomplishments
People (General); 37
Actual Accomplishments
Owner
Renter
Total
Person
Number assisted.-
Total Hispanic
Total Hispanic
Total Hispanic Total Hispanic
White:
0 0
0 0
0
0
18 C
Rack �`rican American
0 0
0 0
0
0
7 C
A.S.-
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
Ame,,,wmm-'A-kpKativel
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
Nation Hary 1 fa ;.^,rI r Pacrlc Islander:
0 0
0 0
0
0
1 C
Amen::n• .r akan Native &White:
0 0
0 0
0
0
1 C
Asan •.••Ata,
0 0
0 0
0
0
1 C
Blaekr„'r can urt—In 8 v:hlte:
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
Ametir Inr.ion Alaskw+ Native & BlacklASican American: C 0
0 0
0
0
1 C
Othe, rui arial,
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
AsianlPacrfrc Islander
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
Hispanic
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 C
---- -- --- ----- ----- --- -- ---- -- --- ----- -----
PRO3 - BREMERTON
----- --- -- ---- -- --- ----- ----- --- -- ---- -- ----
-- --- ----- ----- --- --
---- -- ---- -- ---
----- ----- ---
-- ---- -- --- -----
Page:
----- ----- --- -- ---- -
15 of 21
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
50
RzwenrnF
U -S. Deparrmen: o- Housing and Jr Far'. Dere Dpment Date:
03 -Mar -2017
der
°s
Or op: of Communiry Flgnreng nnr Delle.opmew Tinle:
14:45
n *
IIhII`
I *
Interjrat rn fTsaurSenlenl a Irl l nt(,rn1; :i'1n 5y5tern Page:
17
IIIIIIII
WBG RGlivity Summary Prpor4 (GF'H) for rfitrgram Year 2016
BPEM9:UON
Total:
a a a a a a 29 0
Female -headed Households:
4 a 0
Income Category
Owner
Renter
Total Person
Extremely Low 0
0
0 18
Low Mod 0
0
0 7
Moderate 0
0
0 1
Non Law Moderate 0
a
0 3
Total 0
0
0 29
Percent Law Mod
89"7%
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative
dBenefitting
2016 .4_.i vVI �rll':If ' Jr
rL "': (;kLL1 II.• II•:rl':-L 01 Lll:.-T-l"... r:'.11LiFM,11' l :J aril: :ill.,[ we n...n Lr" 111 I n1 ; or expl.,1:1:�d. 'iurrber
o` rignNnyf C. Inns :'
,irr'.fl fmill t'I
I, nn`,'. f:Kinnll`-li:ll, "I Ilnh,'I' of -I nil'-. I'r:^r• :'rc ••.-n-Illovn-nil" •x11'Ir Ilnl'r no, ". 11,g l' ':11.- 'l1'r;:1 •,111" r..r'l1 f5 of
1•.Lr C� ali i]n e'..'.o,
SII -J
"I1nIUFl r, - L' I;IlJcll l IS al nJ .I1'L'e ( l:flIt—di LI'.:_Aunc rI c,-- ne terlr lid c,. ,tai n.,2 fl'. ..dnig klsine55
.'inrl I;�grn. ;:.rnl n -,V q.
. "__"--"--"-"--"-"-- --"--"__"--"--"-"--"-"--"-"-- __"--"__"-""--"-"--"_"_-.-_"--"__"--"__"--"--"-"--"-"-- --"--"__"--"__"--"--"-"--"-"-- --"--"__"--"--"-"--"-"--"-"-- --"--"__"-
PR03 - BREMERTON Page: 17 of 21
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
51
RzwenrnF U.S. Deparlmen: o- Housing and Ji bar. Dere opment
Date:
03-Mar-2017
der
COs Or op: of C.nmmuni[y Flgnring nnr Delle.opmew
Time:
14:05
.� * IIhII`
I * Integral rn fl s:wrsenlenl alrl Infori11xiln5y5tem
Page:
18
11111111
- WBG Activity Summary Heport (0444) for Ffiogram Year 2016
�T64'+
BRE IgUON
,FY'VSe
PCM Yaw; 2016
Project: 0005 - Kitsap Community Resources-Weatherization and Mirror Home Repair
1015 Activity: 453 - WeathenzaWn and Minor Hone Repair
Status: Open Objective: Create surrable living environments
Location. 154 Sereno Circle C1r Bremwtvrl, WA 99312.8840 orncnate- .,,.r, sena; i'it';
Mautt Cod, Cnerly IT ,, y I grovemams, (14F) National
Ohjeetive:
LMH
Initial Funding Date: 08/1712016
Description:
n ,l on Program provides uueatherization measures and reduces healing costs for low-income families, particularity
for the elderly, peoplewith
disabilities,
and children by
ripi .q,: nr� ril, i hm11n +prnim -NIR inq, inn Their health 111-1 sa+ery.
II1� V. eli[H r,ii fi iii.._ _:110, Irl :�'� VHI-Te ir'(i Ve . `r f1rcm4'n 13,+.1_1�adl.. Coal r"e 1-i uii a'11
111V •ii-aSures.
4-r.usrhmd.=. •::Il I r in rho Neighborhood Revitalization. Swraregy Area, and 4 house :olias outside Thr. CDOG Target area wise served VATh additional
funds from com Tact
ail '?nCm8nl5 -'c 1, .,1113e[i lif'A furies.
Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount
Drawn In Program Year
Drawn Thru Program
Year
BN 2016 B16MC530D11 $19629.57
$•4474.34
$4,474,34
CDBG .. ..
PI $6,360.43
..-.
$8,360A3
$8,360.43
Total Total 527,990.00
512,934.77
S12,934.77
Proposed Accomplishments
Housing units : 6
Actual Accomplishments
Owner Rentar
Ta1Hl
Person
Number assrsted'
Total Hispanic Total Hispanic
Total Hispanic Total
Hispanic
White: 4 a a 0
4 0
0 C
Black/Afdcan Amefican. 0 C 0 0
0 0
0 C
Asian: 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 C
American India i, ask,'-. r.au:e. 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 C
tialive H wa :Clhe• Pack Islander 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 C
',•.0=nea! have&Willie . 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 C
?,s an bAIIIL: 0 C 0 0
0 0
0 0
Black:P,'• cai i',ri i afican&Write, 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
Arnenca•. luciarl+nlaskan Native&13kcidAfriran Ameriran-_ 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 C
ower nlmu-racial. 0 C 0 0
0 0
0 C
AsianlPaci is Islander: 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
---- -- --- ----- ----- --- -- ---- -- --- ----- ----- ----- --- -- ---- -- --- ----- ----- --- -- ---- -- ---- -- --- ----- ----- --- -- ----
PR03 - BREME RTON
-- ---- -- --- ----- ----- ---
-- ---- -- --- -----
Page:
----- ----- --- -- ---- -
16 of 21
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
52
RzwenrnF U.S. Depar[men: o- HDusing and Ji bar. Dere Dpment Date: 03-Mar-2017
der IIhII` °s Or op: of C.nmmuniry 1-1mreng anri Delle.opment Time: 14:45
n I - Inte[13t rr: fTsaurSenll?nl alrl Int[?rnla:i'.ln ern
Syst Page! l9
IIIIIIII - WBG Acclivity Summary Heporl. (GPftj for rfiogram Year 2016
BPEMERTON
Gn'6gg r, F� 6'pe
Hispanic 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total: 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Pemate"headed !'tanseholds4 0 4
Income Category
Owner Renter Total Person
Extremely Low 3 0 3 0'
Low Mod 1 0 1 0
Moderate 0 0 0 0
Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 0
Total 4 0 4 0
Percem LowWod 100.0% 100.0%
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative ti 13—fining
2016 KC .....:. ' L' f 1z':rl:ll Pru 171 ,.:.—d tl-.1I11 7:15"' fl r III" nI f I111 WI l Ulall`: III hf- f.. ;ff'l 1'.1: W 'jI ':' II'I'e :IIS . tl d"I_rl
b'v l r1 �tr ng rl.r r_c10y cffiri..m, cf TI—I n rr.. rims n nr rr; n .' ilc nvv n� Ili- I `cs.r- ln-1 ;n4q:y Thr nr:cd
Irl .IJ........ t� 't ll4't ,I, "'dth" z't'l '.;'l:e� h IrI IJ I. Ye':1 I e i1`:r yL dJU I% I:': 111-Ie lL IJ"'d -I Jfllell' 1 Jh- I -"r),I
pr rll:. I1.1 Ill. 111 r,l[. C,:'q 11t `rI 01-1 r rn r1 .1 Ilr"I I'. nr•: ::'rrl f. ":illI frl' I'-1 III i:7T I•'111'—I,I I, n"•. 'I 1.11 r 11 r, - If rr n Ijru ;i In r, .7 fin
aLICIN "f'li '1'l'IP i` c?plh alif'.
PR03 - BREMERTON Page: 19 of 21
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
53
RzwenrnF U.S. Departmen: o- Hnusing and Jrbar. Dere opment
Date:
03 -Mar -2017
der °s Or'te of Community fXanreng nnr Delle.opmew
Time:
14:45
IIhII`
.� x I * Integratrr: fls:wrsemenl aIrl Intorinxi.'n5ystem
Page:
20
IIIIIIII i Ac ivity Summary i (0444) for Ffiogram Year 2016
BREMERTON
G�6A'!
,FY'VSe
PCM Yal 2016
Project: 0012 - Ciry of Bremerton ADA "improvements at Evergreen Rotary Padt
i Activity: 457 - ADA Improvements at Evergreen Rotary Park
Status: Open Objective: Create suitable living environments
Location. 1400 Park Ave Bremerton, WA 96337.1776 Ouliccri Availability7accessiltdity,
Matrix Code: Parks, Recreational Facilities (03F)
National Objective:
LMA
nil Funding Date: 07M12016
Descriptll
ADA improvements, curb cuts, and sidewalk installation at vehicular entrance to Evergreen Rotary Park
Financing
Fund Type Grant Year Grant Funded Amount Drawn In Program Year Drawn Thru Program Year
CDBG Pre•2015 $16,250. go $0.00 $0.00
2015 515MC530D11 $74918 $0. DO $0,00
Total Total 517,000.DO 50.00 SOM
PrOpnsrrl Accomplishments
T,r: :. P:".:: i, 'il. .�.. :-=•::i:i:'^Arra'.2705
:.r:n :. Ti t .;•: - M:,.: 7227
Annual Accomplishments
Years Accomplishment Narrative if Benefitting
2016 The City 3 street crew completed in stallativn of concrete curbing, sidewalk and ADA ramps and all work was reviewed and approved by the City
Inspector. The City's parks crews completed landscape restoration including topsoil. reseeding as well as installation of plants and bark mulch at
crosswalk in parking lot This walkway completed the sidewalk pedestrian foot path around the perimeter of the park and allowed for complete
ADA access to the Accessible playground.
..----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRO3 - BREMERTON Page: 2D of 21
CAPER 54
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
RzwenrnF U.S. Depar[men: o- Housing and Ji bar. Dere Dpment
der IIhII` COs Of' opt n' Commmni[y Flnnring nnr Delle.opment
n I - IrSte[ 3t rr: fTS:lurSenlPnl •3.lrl Int[?rn1xinn eM
* IIIIIIII * WBG Ac(ivity Sumrnary HrpOrt (GRRj for Ffiogram Year 2016
BREMffUON
Gn'6gg r, F� 6'pe
Total Drawn Thru Program Year•. 3651,608.53
Total Drawn In Program Year: 5296,077.51
PROS - BREMERTON
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
Date: 03 -Mar -2017
Time, 14:45
Page: 21
Page: 21 of 21
55
IDIS- PR05
f
U.5 D P.
a ". 1 H - 1 =:nrl urr r enl:menl
DATE
03-03-17
On-,
mni,, 'Y' Geveol'.menl
TIME
14:06
Inta9rn'.:_,:
Iilei]iy',-�,: I;-.:.i:..;,..i-.r,: it a�rl Irdnrml:i::i•. Syn em
PAPE
1
Cr—I.-r Repan by Rnjficl and 1v9y
RPFVFRTON vlA
RBI QRr FOR
PROGRAM (ABG
9d
Program Yeorl
PGM YR 2016
Line Voucher
LOOTS Groh[ Fund
Drawn
Project
PROJECT ALL
Name Y"a l honer
Item Salus
Sa Dale Year Grant Number Type
Amount
ACTIVITY ALL
�9F 167
3 Completed
12/23x20162016 B16MC530011 R
$6,272.02
6004645
EN
21012017 2016 B16M0530011 E14
57.108.56
Program Year!
II)Iti Prior Voucher
Line Voucher
L0OCS Grant Fund
Prawn
Project
Ari IU A%vvily %I III Year Number
Item Satua
Send Date Year Gant Number Type
Amount
2016 1
CDBG Administration
449 CbBG Fcimij,i;lr,il inn
Program Year 2016 Total
160,871.41
1 Oumpleied
8!2212016 2015 015MC530011 EN
$495.07
5553493
2 Completed
812212016 2016 B15MC530011 BJ
$54.335.26
5us5393
3 Completed
&2212016 2016 B15MMO011 PI
C9"0.3n
ti961088
1 Completer'
-J ;'S ?01; ill 81530011 EN
F.081440
1 CnmpVTll
1: l 221717167078 RI6M1 x.30011 R
_6.302.
7982992
1 C1,11111eter
12123+20162013 01 GbIC530911 R
042
5905708
1 CompictUd
12123126162015 316MC530011 PI
5995706
2 Completed
12,23720162016 B16MC530011 EN
5W".::.
Activity Total
$91,804.42
Project Total
91,804.42
2016 4
ll Oommunity ResourcesBusiness Education
452 BEST
Support and Training
5971977
2 Completed
10111120162016 B10110 11 EPI
$24,219.07
5981440
2 Completed
1212320162916 816M0330011 R
$6,596.36
5907567
2 Completed
1212320162916 316110 11 R
$6,357.79
6009645
5 Culllpleled
2!8!2017 2016 816MC5WQ11 EN
$11.950.45
Activity Total
$49,122 57
Project Total
49,123.57
2016 5
161sap Oammunity Resources -Weather -tion and
453 Weam ir4lion and Minor Home Repair
Minor Home Repair
5971977
1 completed
1N11120162016 B16MC530011 BJ
$4,474.34
5981446
3 Grmpleted
1212320162016 B16MC530011 PI
$2.067.61
DIS -PR05
U.5 D P.
..I' ' H I''-, ;I .lel f :nl:rtlenl
DATE
03-03-17
On-,
mni,, 'Y' Geveol'.menl
TIME
14:06
Inta9rn'.:_,:
I: A. ,-,I rl : I ,I., mr:'i::n. S,"ler,
PAGE
2
SPEMERTON, WA
9d
Program Yeorl
IDIS
Line Voucher
LOOTS Groh[ Fund
Drawn
Project
Act ID Activity
Name Y"a l honer
Item Salus
Sa Dale Year Grant Number Type
Amount
�9F 167
3 Completed
12/23x20162016 B16MC530011 R
$6,272.02
6004645
4 Completed
21012017 2016 B16M0530011 E14
57.108.56
Activity Total
$19,943.32
Project Total
19,943.32
Program Year 2016 Total
160,871.41
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
56
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND DATE: 3W2017
URBAN DEVELOPMENT TIME: 2:11:31 PMI
4FFIGE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PAGE' 74176
DEVELOPMENT
PR07 - Drdwc rwm RepOr'1 by Voucher NurnbOr
- All Vour:hers
IaIS
Status Date
LGICCS Send Dale Gran[ Number
Gtdllt year
Fund TYPp
ReC ipient TIN
M'0612015
814/2015
B15MC530011
2015
EN
916001231
1WO37'.2015
16+712015
B15MC530011
2015
EN
91UM1231
10104+2015
19/712015
815MC530011
2015
EN
916001231
1O.IO91201�
1111712015
615MC530011
2015
EN
916001231
1(11712015
l(V1612015
BI*JC.530011
2014
EN
916031231
10)17/2015
1011FV2015
3.11NIC530011
2014
EN
916031231
19117/2015
ii.'1412015
Bi",NC530011
2015
EN
916461 2 3 1
1911712015
1.:LIW2015
Bl!,F.10530011
2015
EN
915001231
1tU1712015
1 '142615
Bl:ir•.iC530011
2015
EN
916CO1231
1011 712 0 1 5
I`''1 F..+7t715
B 151 C::a90011
2015
EN
4155"1; 3.
1(V1712015
1 1rJ2;15
Bibi -,+C530011
2915
EN
'le, -"12i:-
10124/2015
1['131."':5
R141-.10530011
2014
EN
5.111&:"?3:
111202015
11'2 '2 15
BIIINIC530011
2014
EN
91boloi231
1,112013015
1'.%`:.'::"* -5
BIsr.1c530011
2015
P1
92KO2231
111 2112 0 1 5
li'2 '2:.15
Bl' r,1c530011
2015
EN
916001231
1112112015
1124+.' 'S
1315MC530011
2015
EN
916001231
11123/)015
11.' `2:: _'a
E31!;NIC530011
2015
EN
916001231
11121/2015
1'7"i?^'.S
RIN"CKOO11
2015
EN
916001231
12119/2015
b111-,'[530011
2014
EN
916001.231
1211912015
1'18 2 i5
P.I,WC530011
2014
EN
916001231
1211912015
1:':1Pi2::i5
BI',I:^:i=10011
2015
EN
91MM1231
12119/2015
12'12.12215
61!4:'.:,;C011
2015
EN
916001231
1211912015
.I.:'::1':::.'::15
In 1 WC:7.:30011
2015
EN
916001231
1211912015
12'1::215
61�-.10530011
2015
EN
916031 2 3 1
1211912015
19'1E i:i5
BI5rv1C530011
2015
EN
9161061231
02112/2016
L•'ll:t _E
U1•IP,1C530011
2014
EN
916001231
02112/2016
2111 a:1.r
SIF,r.1c530011
2015
PI
91&001232.
0211212016
2111:2_.
U1,1MC530011
2014
EN
916001 2 3 1
021]217016
511'1=":".':
F.14H(7.530011
2014
EN
91&001731
2+11 2c _v
Ui u,10530011
2014
EN
916003231
0 211 212 0 1 6
`e� I I:SC' F
F.15do1C530011
2015.
EN
91KO1231
0 211212 0 3 6
TJ11!2-:_c
E15mcsW0x3
2015
EN
916001231
0211212016
211101..
R15MC530011
2015
EN
916001231
0211212016
2J11i201ti
B15MC!i:3{7011
2015
EN
9160@1231
02112/2016
211112016
d:'C .?0011
2015
EN
916001,231
02112/2016
211112016
BIF,". C:. -;:3&7011
2014
EN
91MM1231
314/2016
t',1.4,11CS,,0011
2014
EN
916901231
314!2016
E15MC530011
,2015
EN
9115001231
314/2016
615MC530011
24)15
EN
91 6001 2 3 1
03/05/2016
31412€716
E14MC530011
2014
EN
916601231
03195/2016
314/2416
815MC530011
2015
EN
916401 2 3 1
03105/2016
31412016
815MC530011
2015
EN
91 6001 2 3 1
712912016
616MC530011
2616
PI
916461231
712Bi7016
816MC53G011
2016
PI
916401731
71 29120 1 6
E311110530011
2014
EN
916001231
06.10212016
612/2016
B I rr.,iC530011
2016
P1
916001231
0MLV2016
612&2016
B1dr,1C530011
2014
EN
916401231
04+0312016
612/2016
RI4r.1C530011
2014
EN
916901231
ES912712016
6312212016
Bi'.,iC530011
2015
EN
916061231
04122/2016
W2212016
fi I i MC530011
2916
EN
916001231
OE1122/2016
63122.+2016
61 C.h,10530011
2015
PI
916001231
091(912016
91412016
B16MC520011
2016
EN
916001231
74178
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
57
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND DATE: 31312417
URBAN DEVELOPMENT TIME: 2:11:31 PMI
4FFIGE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PAGE' 75176
DLv�-"FrfLNT
PR07- Drdwd(wAi Number
-All VOUcI'C:i
WK
Pay" TIN
Program
pY
Drawn Arnourrt
916M1231
t.r7RG
$46,400.78
916041231
C: DLG
$76,711.00
91fi641231
r)RG
$62,988.40
916041231
CDBG
$15,i22.fi0
916601231
Cr7BG
$18,793.06
916001231
CDBG
$14,702.42
916601231
CDBG
$2,833.34
916001231
ODBC
$15,400.09
916661231
CD6G
S91.41
9 1600 12 3 1
GDBG
$11,175.89
916001231
CDRG
$11,252.81
916601231
CDBG
$11,453.88
915441231
CDBG
$32,037.34
916661231
CDBG
$2,739.25
918001231
C6BG
$5,19&.32
916601.231
GDBG
52,833.34
916001231
C018G
$1,928.3fi
916661231
CDBG
$182.12
916041231
CDBG
$26,198..59
916601231
CDBG
59,599.37
9 1 600 123 1
C:08G
$3,037.77
9 1666 123 1
CDBG
57,633.55
9 1 600 1 2 31
CDBG
32,633.34
9 1 566 1 23 1
CDBG
3166.51
915441231
C: rJ BC,
9;10,431.23
916061231
C:DLG
Y
$2,188.99
97 6607 23 1
crrRG
Y
$4,443.13
916401231
LDLG
Y
541.74
916601231
C.DRG
Y
$15,60G.00
916061231
CL'13G
Y
$21,975.82
9113661231
C.DRG
V
$23,740.50
915001231
4:DBG
v
$5,452.99
915661231
C'rIRG
Y
$56,378.60
9 1500 123 1
CDLG
Y
$5291.37
91SW1221
C:r7BG
Y
$21,975.62
915W1231
CDBG
Y
$19,000.00
916601231
CDBG
55,381.98
916 01231
CDBG
$565,19
916601231
CDBG
$61259.50
916041231
Cr1RG
v
$5,301.96
916443231
CDe3G
Y
$565.19
916661231
-..r)RG
Y
56,259.50
915001231
CL7BG
5&2.7:4
916603231
c r1RG
$1.334.07
916061231
CDUG
$11.906.36
91 6661 29 1
C r7RG
$1,334,07
91ri17012.31
i.: DEG
$17,904.35
91 6661 23 1
CDBG
S5.00
916441231
CDBG
$496.07
916601231
CDBG
$64,335.26
916441231
CDBG
$470.38
916661231
CD6G
516,$30.98
75178
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
58
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND DATE: 31312017
URBAN DEVELOPMENT TIME: 2:11:31 PMI
4FFIGE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PAGE' 76176
DEVELOPMENT
PRO7 - Drawdrwm Repbr'1 4y Voucher Number
All Vour:hers
lal$
V0Q0W Number
Line Ilem
1015 project ID
IDI5 AGC 10
voucher Grmed
Vnurher 9ratus
5971977
1
5
453
liV1.112616
Completed
2
4
452
1LU11i2616
Campleted
5961448
1
1
449
11JW2016
Completed
2
4
452
1116120115
Campleted
3
5
453
111&2616
Completed
5962342
1
1
449
11114126115
Campl[tnd
5967567
1
1
449
1113612016
Cancelled
2
4
452
11136121116
Completed
3
5
453
1113012016
Completed
599228-4
1
5
444
12;7-472916
CMJAPIRJ
2
5
444
12114120115
Completed
59472RR
1
4
433
72174+7016
Complexed
'399S3 ;;a
1
1
449
12+23120115
Completed
2
1
449
82;73i7016
C'amnleted
6UtA5
1
4
443
21!12017
Campleted
2
4
443
2)712617
Dompleted
3
432
21712617
Completed
4
5
453
2712617
Completed
5
4
452
21712017
Completed
TOTAL DRAWS:
76178
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
59
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND DATE: 31312017
URBAN DEVELOPMENT TIME: 2:11:31 PMI
4FFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PAGE' 77176
DEVELOPMENT
PR07 - Drdwc rwm Repor'1 by Voucher Nurnber
- All Vouchers
lal$
SfAws Clete LGICCS Send Date Gran[ Number Gtdllt year Fund 7yp0 Req lipient TIN
1.0.+1212016
10111/2016
B16MC530011
2016
EN
916001231
101121201E
1{.V11J2016
B15MC530011
2015
EN
91UM1231
12123/2016
12!2312016
616MC530011
2016
PI
916001231
1212312016
121231201E
B1F,N1C530011
2015
PI
9115001231
12123/2016
1212312016
B14,10530011
2016
PI
916631231
12123120115
12123120115
316MC530011
2D16
PI
916071231
12123120116
11130/2016
Bl"MC530011
2016
PI
916461 2 3 1
12+2312916
12.+2312416
B1 (,r.10530C111
2016
PI
915001231
12123J2016
12+2312016
616NIC530011
2015
PI
916CO1231
12123/2016
12;23120115
B 151 C:a90011
2015
EN
41�f.•^•?,'3.
12+23.120116
12123!2016
1sLora C530011
2615
PI
Cali,
12124/2016
12123/2016
B141.dC530011
2014
EN
CHIC"'.":
121241201E
12+231201'3
BICNIC530011
2618
PI
91bJ10i23'_
12124/2016
1212312016
B16111C'530011
2016
EN
92KO2231
0216912017
21612017
Bidr.lc530011
2014
EN
916001231
02109/2017
21612017
RI111IC530011
2017
PI
91NO1231
02109120.11
21412017
B1'IN1C530011
2014
rN
916001231
02A)W.2017
716/2017
1316MC530011
2016
EN
916441231
02H3912017
2V2017
B15MC530011
2016
EN
916001231
77178
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND DATE: 3[312017
URBAN DEVELOPMENT TIME: 2:11:31 PMI
4FFIGE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PAGE' 7$f7$
DLv�-"FrfLNT
PR07- Drdwd(wi Re4aiai:::d'Jniich0r Number
-All Voucl-c:i
W,
Pay" TIN
Program
pY Drawn Amount
916001231
t.r7RG
$4,57=.34
916441231
is DEG
$2�.2;J.0
91GW1231
r)RG
$61855.38
9164b1231
C:DEG
$6,596.36
916061231
Cr7RG
22,037.61
916001231
CDBG
$11,243.34
916001231
CDBG
$3,573.94
916001231
ODf35
$6,357.79
915001231
CDBG
$5.272.82
9 1600 12 3 1
ODBG
$76,803.92
916001231
CABG
$817.08
916001231
GDEG
$57,404.68
916401231
CDEG
33,573.134
915W1231
CDUG
$5W.07
916401231
C6BG
$13,824.32
916M1231
GD6G
$144,32
916401231
C018G
$802.95
916W1231
CABG
$7,108.55
916Wi231
CDHG
$11,950.45
CD80
TOTAL DRAWS: 814,357494.96
814,357,394.96
78178
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
61
-
Us Department at Mou9ng and Urban Development
DATE
03.03.17
°•
,'
office of Community Planning and Development
TIME
14:13
Integrated Dsbursement and Information System
PAC£
1
IIIIIIII
CDBG Sunni of Accomplishments
n
rsProgram
IFN
Year. 2015
❑c., 1:1�
BREMERTON
Count of CDBG Activitieswith Disburserrentsby Activity Group & Matrix Code
Cam. ;Irtcrl
Activity Group
Activity Category Open Activities
Completed
AC vi l: ee
program Year
Tata! Activities
Open Count Disbursed
Count
i•,crl
Count
Disbursed
Economrc Development
Rehab; Publicly or Privately. Darted 2 $0 OD
0
3Q.00
2
$000
Cgmmgr�ial+Indust'ial (14E)
�sao-E^fie p•ise rrssistanoe (18q 1 $37,173.22
0
$0.00
1
$37,17322
ornl=.-n-rrnic `rvelonm enc 3 $37,17322
a
$0.00
3
$37,173.22
Housing
Du, -,r Arastance (13) 0 $0.00
1
$000
1
$0.00
Energy Eiicicncv inprovements (14F) 3 $12,634,77
0
50.00
3
$12,63477
Total Mousing 3 $12,834.77
1
$0.00
4
$12,834.77
Public Facilimsard Improvements% is Facirnes;inu lrnr.?ruverne,( 2 $135,025.66
0
$O.D)
2
$135,025.69
(; TIVI'll) tp:7j
.r.Ks. t?;•c c-a.rr •'a 1-a�ili>.as )030 1 $0.00
1
$19,239.42
2
$19,23942
mnrr.v--rlcnr=. 3 $135,Q25 68
1
$19,239.42
4
$154,265.10
General Administration and
Cr"•:;I (21A) 1 $91,604.42
0
$O.OD
1
$91,604.42
Planning
Total Genera:. donir•.istrar,on and
Planning 1 $91,804,42
0
$0.00
1
$91,804.42
Grand Total
30 $276,83809
2
$19,239.42
12
$296,077.51
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
62
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
63
U.S. Department of Mousing and Urban Development
DATE
03.03.17
Office of Community Planning and Development
TIME
14=13
Integrated Dsbursement and Infcrmation *Zem
PAGE
2
IIIIIIII
CDBG Summary of Accomplishments
n
vs
IFN
I
Program Year: 2015
❑NF
BREMERTON
CUBG Sum of Actual Accomplishments by Activity Group and Accomplishment
Type
Activity Group
Matrix Code Accomplishment Type
Program Year
Open Count Completed
Count
Totals
Economic Development
Rehah. Rlh ir'q a Ir:,aII ly 0., -ed Business
2,705
0
2,705
Com l"I r!'::I �iIP I I I:1'.:5,,I 1'I CI
Micro C....egrisc K.i:I St l^[s' (,aq Persons
29
0
29
TOtal E— u col . ---L;oment
2,734
0
2,734
Housing
WEr [ H-Ieur- •e =Ino %wsinar.w j13) Households
0
1
1
5telyy-2Itileuu,y ;nly:•u.r=lllrnts f14F) Housing Units
29
0
29
Total
29
1
30
Public Facilities and
Pupli, [ acilittes and I mprovement (General) (03) Public Facilities
4,830
6
4,830
Improvements
lla,s. Ilece?,Lc^air-acilit,es !C3rI) Public Facilities
2,705
137,836
140,541
-orol i- Fachiries aa"I "PI ovem ents
7,535
137,635
145,371
Grand Total
10,298
137,837
148,135
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
63
-
V * ���{{t1����• *'
n IIIIIIII
vs I
IFN c
Housing -Nan Housing
U.S. Department of Mousing and Urban Development
office of Community Flan.ning and Development
Integrated Dsl ursement and Information System
CDBG S. mni of Accomplishments
Program Year: 2015
BREMERTON
CDBG Beneficiarieshy Racial l Ethnic Category
Race
Total Persons
DATE
TIME
F'AGE
Total Hispanic
Persons Total Households
03.03.17
14:13
3
Total Hispanic
Households
Rousing
White
0
0
27
0
Asian
0
0
1
0
Anic n; r; nkan Native&White
❑
0
1
❑
Ot hr ^i.i - "Ji
0
0
1
0
Tot.. -.1 1•.
30
0
Non Rousing
Wlu'•::
]H
0
❑
0
f3l-l:.At—n American
7
0
0
0
Asim
0
0
0
0
Na;—-AamaiianrOther Pacific Islander
1
0
0
0
Ame•i::, r1i=nJWaskan Native& White
1
0
0
0
Asim - -,Ii ,
1
0
0
0
Arne: ins—)Alaskan Native & OlaCii
0
0
Ami. -
1
0
Tot r.1 'Jan Rousing
29
0
0
0
Grand total
whi-
16
0
27
0
B'acl: Al— Arnedcan.
7
0
0
0
Asim
p
0
1
4
Na: Rwif:r lsn-d.^.r
I
0
0
0
A,,,,, i:., •.i
0
1
0
ASI2i1 .. �,J1 ..
1
❑
0
0
Am, l i i:rJaskm Native & Black/African
0
0
Am =:
1
❑
Othr.. ..,ir..-.oval
0
❑
1
0
Total Grand Total
29
0
30
0
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
64
-
U.S. Department cf Housing and Urban Development
DATE
03.03.17
V
office of Community Flan.ning and Development
TIME
14=13
* ���{{t1����•
Integrated Dsbursement and Information *stem
PAGE
4
*'
IIIIIIII
CDBG 9.trnmay of Accomplishments
n
vs I
IFN
Program Year: 2015
❑NF
BREMERTON
CDBG Beneficiaries by Income Category
I ncnme Levels
Owner Occupied
Renter Occupied
Persons
Hvugng
Ext rc nely Lwv (<=3095)
3
0
0
Con •' 3046 and I= 504b)
1
0
❑
Mod (> 50Mi and <=W%)
0
0
0
Total LOA -'sod
4
0
0
Non Lc,+ -moi (-8046)
0
0
0
Total bel lell-I -
4
0
0
Non Housing
Ext r H�ly LuA {t =30%)
0
0
18
I.— 3095 and C= 5046)
e
0
7
Mort 5095 and <=6046)
❑
0
1
Toml I_rn.-Mod
0
❑
20
Non low -Mod (,8046)
0
0
3
Total Beneficiaries
0
0
29
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
65
0ffio,0 awenunity Planning and Developrdemi
DATE; 03-03-17
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Daveloprnani
7P4E 14:15
Inkegraled oisbursemerx and 111ormanpn S�Mem
PACS- 1
v
7jG IIIIIIII
L PR26 - CDBG RrWciai SiMMarY Report
F�
e-R1J Program Year 2016
&'1'N i'; ,i 5`� 13REnMERTCN , WA
PART I S.TIMARY OF CDUG RESIDURCES
01 -11NU5 A I \:i Or--':<L:;,J! 1c -V:ad:'Am YEAR
0.00
02 ENT T. FIJFNT ('F'WIT
417,438.00
03 .SLIP'_J`: UHUAFe P,_•,: �,:':',_
0.00
(14 SFC'T C7hJ I.OF C...AF?.•%r•JTFFr, I' AN FUNDS
0,00
05 0--.H, 1.H P-0,RAM 4U1.11-
39.106.77
(Ka C: 7,RFNT'r F:':R:F;'T CN''OF. ':V ;7AM ItM, .r,--'FOR-y1 TYPE)
0.00
06=UrdD'S 11 -1 10 1 11 C LI NL U= C-4-r. 1
0.00
Of F1 W)G. ,FT0nF.1FFI -C -HF ::C`tl :T:SF: %�C`X'JI Jrvl
0,00
CH ;.:_JUN-11,1: .- 1-UUY-r,-JI- U-4,[AV.4JLAUL_
6.06
08 TU-^, AVra 1 2V.1 - : fJ PA . I NFF; 01-c".
456,548.77
PAR" _.."f.1AH,' OF LJ3ti L11=LNDI -U L.i
09 DI OTHER -1 VA .#i T ON ;Of. ,I-PA•MEWSA\C)PIANNINISTRATION
204.273.09
10 AL'dLl'SI r, ='•:T TO ZXXARJT = -O-.L °L'iMN l[:;:�f.:` TO _C:k`;1 rr1Ol.] ii='i El-:, 1-
0. DO
11 Al•.^:::Urd 1 SJUWECT TO i-Cr,:,,. P01) :1 M I- I r1 :f., C9 - I.I nI: ;17i
204.273.09
12 DISF..i=i'.=+1]IN IDISFCR t..=:FJIJ: ititi,: {[Jr:°:•,.5'=�n-I(?',
91,804.42
13 IN I DI S FO'« `RX'Q\ 1;i1 I . IAYMLI,116
0.00
14 AP..1l1:iTr:'=•:-TL'1CIJMF1LJT=. Q--A1 FXPFNo4TVR�5
000
15 rU: =,L LYHLNL: I Jkt ��. �:�.9. LI \,LS 11.14)
296,077.51
I i- JIIF;1r1FhJrlr7 BJ,::�.`,C'.F I I %F::9 LIVE 25}
160.4$9.26
PAR' I. LUVa M`- -'L) UU4L=1 I "I I S LPOR'I NG PERI OO
17 FKTFNF)71 MR I i ix'u VM H0. ^.,. \i' I rJ ::?=+. ;I ':I :.RFA$
0.00
18 L w-rdL 1: F{.H U- ,'F ".'UL; r,1UL I I „ , I IU1-151 `JG
0.00
19 DI FFP c?:+R;,� < •..^.Tti- :.:'rdu': t li 1rJ A, F `dl 71155
191,438.32
20 ALJUtolh,'f_`,"IU 1_GL'-"JIL'U---LLr*1vC cSM17
0.00
21 TO-?: 1 CA,,C1 °:1:.; : MFr)I T : . A4, I NF$ 17-20)
191,438.32
22 FIJ-S:LN 1 _,. e'1: MMU i U',6 I:r LI IJL 1.1)
93.7296
LOW! BENEr=1 T -:--P L1 :...--I vFAr: CFRTL FI CATI ONS
1,3 f'ROIG4 RM YEARS(FY) C:::: rtf=LL: I'•1 G:c- I : i C:! - I U',
Py! Py-. P1".
'a C Inn-t1RT1VE NET 17x1-1. rdr> r,a<f ; _+,1K)I-C1 1U 1(:`4W BQNffIT CALCULATION
0.00
':110-FC11-1 c-l'Tr53HrdHl` 111 „Vr MO.)F9450NS
0.00
�6 -)L`JL� 11U L0:•v: ei:.:+`: F"Ch" ;NS (.1 NE 25,rUNE 24)
0.00%
;,.A R- ', ri!RI I C 77R'vI CF . n�) C:Ar -r',LCGLATI0NS
:: UI <�,w .L LI ', U15 . ,,y-I �U._;_11; .Y;?_:..L'LS
0.00
78 F:: MAI OUI A Fri OR :=:T'. i 10.,'.4 ii FND CF p1F,-%FNT -,ROCS YEPR
0 00
,y i::_ UN- Q.11 LA LU C':L'LI aA I UNE A UV OF t 2LVI QUS PROGRAM YEAR
0.00
V, :':-1. 111 r,-,,- TO CCr,,-tjTF-D-:d FY:I-)BI IIai Ips z5
0.00
'.) %, 1-"-'Ui:I. C. ,IIUNS(UNE2t* U NL 2 8 - U NL 29 + L I NE 30)
0.00
I HJT 'I '.11 N I -�7aNT
417.433.00
,17.:C4:`L
7.142.36
34�.,-.:J.,TN'W-^.-T�;t::.v-lJTE-0 'd.SLB,ECTTOPS CAP
0.00
35 '10..:,,_SUBJLt I ;. 1=.;LAP(9UM.1-INES32-34)
42+1.500.313
36 PEP�ZNT FUNDS Cb-I GATED FOR PS ACTT 0 TI ES W NIIE 311 LI NE 35)
019096
PART V: PLANNI NG AND ACIM I NI STRAY[ ON (P-) ;:A;,
37 DI S. RECD I, I DirCP -1 ANrr r[ ADM-. MSTPT, 1:_)•,91,804.42
3s r"-._•...IQ- ,. r=:'O31,1(,1::7I1;r•Sfil:-•.1;Or:x;r?l r•.-F'Fxr_. MYEAR
0.00
39 PA LA&1 Qltl :i; l ,__ :-. aLI C-A' I:-J S ^. I L'rL) 01F+ !:1::'I.15 -c l; ,RAM VFAR
0.00
"0 +1D.11JSTMENT TO C- :rV.71JTE 70-:u Fn ca.Ic!,'.T i1N[-,
0.00
41 1V'A.-P1•C:L:_1:d'.I UFJS(UNE37+LINE 38-LINE 39+LINE 40)
91,804.42
<1 FNT T. F.",1FNT -RA,%T
417,438,00
'',i-OUL
39.108.77
W5T1,17 SIJB EGT Tp PR CAF
0.00
456.546.77
-'.i. f�FrY.FFff711NF;,j-,IF IGATs.DPOP PA,ALTIMTIES(LI NE4IJUNE45)
20.11%
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
LI NE 18 DETAIL: ACTT V I TI ES TO CONST DER I N OETERM I NI NG THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON Ll NE 18
Report returned no data
Lf NE 19 D5 -TAI L: ACT] VI Tl FS INCLUDED I N THE COM PUTATI ON OP LI NE 19
Plan Year
IDIS Project
Offio, bf OWerlunity Nanning and DENelopmwt
Activity Nam,
DATE;
03-03-17
U.S� Department of Housing and Urban Development
Numbe4
7 ME
14:15
Code
Objective
Integrated Disbursemerx and Intprmanon item
2014
PAGe
z
v
7JG IIIIIIII
Construction- Weg Hills Pre -School
PR26 - COBG FnWcial SLmmarY Report
F�
LMA
557,404,68
2415
ek1`
444
Program Year 2016
Save Wes[ Fulls Pre-Schcd
03
LMA
377,621.00
CSG Adminrarativn
6REMERTON , WA
$6,655.38
2015
03
LI NE 17 DETAIL:
ACTI V I TI ES TO CONSIDER I N OETERM I NI NG THE AMOUNT TO
ENTER ON Ll
NE 17
422
5949681
IDI S
Voucher Matrix
National
Target
2013
Plan Year 141 S Rroject
Activity
Activity Name
Number Code
Objective
Area Type
brawn Amount
2016 5
453
5971977 Weal'.heiizat.on and Miner Home N2palr 14F
LMH
51rategy area
$4,474.34
2016 5
453
5981448 Weatherixation and MAnor Home Repair 14F
LMH
Strategy area
$2„067.61
2016 5
453
59$7567 Weatherizatrpn and Minor Home FWalr 14F
LMH
aralogy area
$6,272.$2
2015
4
14F
Matrix C9de
9E5T
$12,834.77
Total
$24,219.07
2016
4
452
112,8.34.77
LI NE 18 DETAIL: ACTT V I TI ES TO CONST DER I N OETERM I NI NG THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON Ll NE 18
Report returned no data
Lf NE 19 D5 -TAI L: ACT] VI Tl FS INCLUDED I N THE COM PUTATI ON OP LI NE 19
Plan Year
IDIS Project
IDISActivity Voucher
Activity Nam,
Matrix
National
Numbe4
Number
code
Code
Objective
Drawn Amounl
2014
4
433
5992288
Construction- Weg Hills Pre -School
03
LMA
557,404,68
2415
5
444
5992284
Save Wes[ Fulls Pre-Schcd
03
LMA
377,621.00
CSG Adminrarativn
21A
$6,655.38
2015
03
Mal rex Code
$135,025.68
2013
2
422
5949681
Walker Park
03F
LMA
$1,334.07
2013
2
422
5949592
Walker Fork
03F
LMA
317,900.35
2013
2
422
5949703
Walker Park
03F
LMA
$5.00
03F
Matrix Code
319,239.42
2015
4
452
5971977
9E5T
18C
LMC
$24,219.07
2016
4
452
5981448
BEST
18C
LMC
$6,596.36
2016
4
452
6997567
88tT
18C
LMC
$6,357.79
18G
Malt Ix Cape
$37.173.22
Total
LI NE 27 DETAIL: ACTI VI TI E5 INCLUDED IN THE C7M PLFTATI ON OF LI NE 27
Report returned no data.
LI NE 37 DETAIL: ACTT VI TI FS INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LI NE 37
� 191.9 3 tl.3 L
Plan Year
I DIS Project
101 SActivity VouCber
Activity Name
Malrix
National
Numbe4
code
oojeclive
Drawn Amount
2016
1
449 5956493
CDaG Administration
21A
$65,800..71
2016
1
449 5961888
CDflG Administration
21A
$10.830.96
2016
1
449 5961446
CSG Adminrarativn
21A
$6,655.38
2015
1
449 5962992
Ct BW Administration
21A
$4,243.34
2016
1
449 5995708
CSG Administration
21A
$4,074..01
21A
Matrix Code
$91.804.42
Total
$91,604.42
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
67
2016 Project Profiles
Creating Economic Opportunities
Ki Co,nuntui ty lZe- o�ce,�-
Bremerton, WA
SNAPSHOT`
Activity :y;[: -Business education
6l
and microenterprise assistance
project Total 4115,000
CDBGFunds •$65.896
TheBE$7programservesaremertonandallothercommunitiesofKBsapCounty.Atypicalprogramyear
sees approximately 50%o1 clients served from Bremerton,
Leverage Ralier-0.5
Key Resull — Mowing 29 individuals
0—i the best. ways to address poverty in any community is to foster an environment where new
from IOW -income situations t0
PEOP4E
"""""""""""'°"""'""'°""""""
business can grow and thrive_ BEST provides the support that often is lacking For low-income persons.
The program's target audience indudrs, but is not limited to i the unemployed, underemployed.,
becoming small business owners in
individuals with disabilities, Winter cititens, veterans, minorities, refugees and immigrants,
one year.
Example of a project beneficiary —
BEST (Business Education Support and Training) is a micro-enterprrse program that provides
In April 2015,a Bi graduate
PROJECT
businessW•:,`—sbac rtilcne, with facet=Yng ac— to capital to help
Shared that her business has grown
clients witn Im cadd=vFlr.p -he r business. i, 707679 6remerton and gitsap
to support her family of six and she
county si��>,i, . ; r. r -, r=:ji- - r.-r++�'r' -.� b.---. BEST provides the path
has recently hired tale employees.
to ramify stahilay �,� yr - ;,,r;i<:�«•�r:y d,r��.el� ;n-�I� h�„r�«„ r:w,«.r„ir;.
Her family is no longer dependent
upon SNAP and TANK. Her creditPARTNERS
Kitsap County Community Development Block Grant Program• Connection Credit union, Kitsap Credit
Score Is improving and for the firs)
Union
time she feels it may be possible to
purchase her own home in a few
years.
.,.•�.
$
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Ila
•.
f�'
Svxvi,vr�•Lrnu-unt�Nirnu'u.fY�L
ncv»+ae,]'e+'sc»1yani�h'eirt3trnxis in•thc�. (�ti.
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
M
HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME)
C&msvzuV,ty Fra4neWOV4 Project Profile
B ",i W [Nv B revterto-w
Bremerton, WA
SNAPSHOT
Activity y;r= - Affatdable Housing
Project 7o1.al - $10892.724
FederaB Funds - S 7,394,417
PLACE h ui th c frr. nous r to w ere r un ¢ well oae o years old Much has not been welt•malntained over the
Leverage Ratio— 1.4 r s.�-rl uL, r:, - r. •.. -t. occupmtn - .I , nr.ermostmillhborhoods. Absentee landlords
:.•..-.�..,�udks farhames thatarevacantantl in need
Doleclive —To create home I: _'.' t - -r! •. .. •a. healthy, and energy efficient, so that after
purchase opportunities and deliver " 'r: t .. •r: -, .
financial education for people, who r..., • ,- ;, I _,., , r -. I,. ..:_.,. ,r ,:-- -.. v 11.,
would otherwise be priced out of PEOPLE warker,a
the marker, w ,• . - .«,. ,. ,,,, heir
Program Beneficiary—"Anew
homeowner was previously living in r , . "I , . r , . _ , • of area
Seattle paying more in rent for a PROJECT t -,. , r t , t r , :� t ,r cl ,, t :. r •i : r, :r : , rchase
450 square foot studio apartment U'ic'rbyputtingthefir'istrinktrhrtand I'ar,d... p eonthurrewhome.
than he will now be paying towards
the mortgage of his newly rm 'I X111 -u•,Ity partners have Important rules as renders, real—, conrractors, suppliers and ou!, -v,.: 4s
remodeled house. The home was PARTNERS neghhon.nthersreelmeposrrmenergyandare,nsrmdmlmpnerhMow aze.
initially out of his price range, but ncreased Seo,oao In arve between p r -and past -rehab mnbmuring sle r „ c,;r• so
with the help of down payment .hd wnrtces.
assistance, he was able to afford it
comforiabiy."
Community Development Black Grant (CDBG)
Servi+vA-Lrnv- ane{ 1.4nde+'a-InWmePe+'so+ ancLNeighba+-Fwv[td-E the
G -S. IIIII ' r
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
W
Creating Suitable Living Environments
cityofBr"WFtovt ' o "
ADA T vLro-vw nn k t g- Evergree4 v X o irw y Tia i
Bremerton, WA
Lit
- i v
r
'.
I
SNAPSHOT
Acfivily yl:e - Public Fatalities
Improvements
Project Total -$17,000
C❑BC PundS - $17,000 ------------- Evergreen Rotary Park is a prcr ier waterfront park with regional significance drawing an
PLACE �Stima!ed ?4J. 00 •.istrr, yez [9urt•J-'.vi p. In addition to ihq :v'Idl}• papular iniJu;'nrw
Key Result—Improved right-of-way p1,,C aard`undcrl r -r:111,-.vlth C7r `pnrl s,uo:vos of ppoplo Barrer w•r=eicryaz thin park for
improvements and safe, aocessible the Er L-urtnn I rim-, Varket, a^c for county -wide events including the annual S-11
pathways W Evergreen Park's Ceremony, Juneteenth event, and the K;tsap Pride Event.
Accessible Playground. I Evergreen Rotary Park Is located within the Community Development Block Grant 2016-2020
PEOPLE Conso idaled Plan Target Area. The Park serves residents within its Cein s Tract M (wherein
Park Information --The Evergreen 77"r cd residr" c r.amci
art lawi.'ncrlcratc. in. �o',v inc,n:c rcrslr:cn-s raccugi:o.,i [..^.r. Ci:w that
Rotary Park inclusive Playground Is rely on public iac tics for no -cost recreation., and drawsvisitors county -wide.
Bremenon and Kitsap County's first
fully accessible playground, PROJECT Pathway and publ c n ht -of -way im-cvemews v Evergreen Rotary Park were listed as
designed to provide play •. pr u•itv in d< pled 2Ct4Park, Hecredtion &.Open Space Pian. These
opportunities to children regardless imp,ocemr tc tin r-m:t t aro- trdrtural harriematthe site toensure the
of ability. The project design goes public his access :o safe, no cost recreation.
beyond the minimum accessibility
Standards to create a play City of Bremerton Parks Department and Public Works Department, Rremerion
environment that includes everyone PARTNERS Rotary, Bremerton Beyond Accessible Play, Department of Natural Resources,
and challenges themat their pelpartment of Ecology
individual level.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)[a. Y� I�(�iI
`� ./ ServutgLaw-a.ncLMociertxt�-Trtc;orrte.€'e+'aottAartd-Neig7tboriwutt2-in:i3te.t1.5. ry5^,,IIIIII`i.
t 1 I I�
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
70
Decent Housing & Viable Communities
Ka�ap C&Imnuuviy 12e3o cel
Weathe-rw5ar'o-M a+,& M"1,0 -r n0-"WF'ePa"r
Bremerton, WA
SNAPSHOT
Aiol;v:iL- Energy Efficiency r
Improvements: aRcrdable housing
Project Tmal - $1,002,444
CDUG Funds - $98.827 --- PLACE T141 T141 1,111. 1 ir, 1n.anm . . . . . . I 111 1, N11SM This r4RSA
-jnc� -, �, 7 u,n-.- and ntlldlltjal
Leverage Rahn_0.9 01no,". , " -".i --r- ;' l
At -0,. , k ;(W zl, J ..�l i i. I nth—h&&
Key Result - Health. Safety. and PEOPLE i. 2 11 . .... .... 9 1. 11 1 L I I, I � P- " k' I
Security measures, ADA , .. -,,--h: 1".. e
acces-Mility, and energy efficiency 1-31
improvements for low income -111 101:J -0 (11 5e1 -d h-ing -dili-. TI -1
homeowners and renters ....... .. ,"j 11, k, 111,1011, M11111 Faellitift, 3. HoW19 CWS
are greener than 30% of hoo srhald income, a c, More th,., are q .n per -.1.
Quo[a from a beneficiary - -We are
so thankful for all the work you have The city tal h -n a Inng time Ra I— wird Kit.n 1--t, R-111 bn prnnde Me M,nbr H— R"a, And
done for our family! You have all PROJECT A,- I 1� -i:,.1 r:, , - , - , -1 i, -H la,n, U 1=•1 1. n r-1 —Flp for the --nit,, as—ll .1
been so wonderful to work with! We 1- Ill 1-'- 01 14 - 1! 11, 'Ll -
appreciate all your time and effort to
help make our home moreCORE Wrdl Ml -to W -1h, �1,11 1., 1, J.- , I- I
PARTNERS hu Ith and Wety repairs to bL :1::r w (I I 'U- 1 -1 - 1, 1 1-. j S, 01r- I!, If 1 ", D. . .
comfortable and affordable for us. It and Human 5-i- Washington 5tate Matiti Maker, and Puget 5-d Energy,
is amazing to know that people and
programs like yours exist. We will
be forever grateful!"
Community Development BloiCk Grant (CDBG)
CAPER
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015)
71
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
MEETING SPEAKERS LIST
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME BELOW IF YOU PLAN TO COMMENT
SO YOUR NAME CAN BE INCLUDED IN THE RECORD
C'I- wt 8s ct r-� vz J-,, r
PAv�
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CLERK
THANK YOU
SUBJECT: Claims & Check Register
SUMMARY:
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
Study Session Date: N/A
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017
Department: Financial Services
Presenter: Shannon Corin
Phone: 473-5323
Approval of the following checks and electronic fund transfers:
1) Check #'s 372510 through 372742 and EFT's 17084 through 17126 in the amount of
$2,291,444.16.
2) Regular Payroll for the pay period ending February 28, 2017 in the amount of $680,639.68.
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: N Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the consent agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny
Form Updated 01/07/15
❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON 6B
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Minutes of Meeting — Study Session Date: N/A
March 1, 2017 COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017
Department: City Council
Presenter: Council President
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: Attached is the summary of the City Council Meeting on March 1, 2017.
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/A
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: N ConsentAgenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny
Form Updated 12/15/15
❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order Wednesday,
March 1, 2017, at 5:02 PM in Council Conference Room 603 of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT
CENTER, 345 6t" Street, Bremerton, Washington, with Council President Eric Younger
presiding. Council Members present were Richard Huddy, Dino Davis, Greg Wheeler, Jerry
McDonald, Leslie Daugs, and Pat Sullivan. Also present were City Attorney Roger Lubovich; City
Clerk Shannon Corin; Council Assistant Christine Grenier; and Kevin Matthew, Information
Services Manager.
A COUNCIL BRIEFING was held to discuss General Council Business at 5:00 PM in the Council
Conference Room. At 5:30 PM the meeting moved to the Meeting Chambers.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Pat Sullivan followed by the Invocation
provided by Associate Pastor Russ Reuther of Sylvan Way Baptist Church.
MAYOR'S REPORT — President Younger (on behalf of Mayor Lent) ...
• Proclaimed the Month of March 2017 as "Brain Injury Awareness Month"; which was
accepted by Suzanne Griffin, Brain Injury Alliance of WA (Kitsap County); Rick Benari
and Donovan Glen both shared testimony on their recovery and living with the injury; and
Kenni Tubbs announced that details for a fundraiser event this fall will be available soon
on their new website at www.kitsapbraininoury.org. Ms. Griffin thanked the City for their
support and proudly displayed her 2nd Place Quilt from last year's Kitsap County Fair;
• Invited David Raymond and Jeremy Linn forward to present 100 teddy bears donated by
the community for children who are transported during emergencies to Interim Fire Chief
Pat McGanney and Stacy Parizek, Director of Operations for Olympic Ambulance.
KEDA QUARTERLY REPORT
Kathy Cocus, KEDA Business Development Director provided highlights on economic
development in Kitsap County for the 4t" Quarter of 2016; and introduced Mike Hamilton, Critical
Informatics, who discussed services that KEDA provides to its clients. Comments and questions
were provided by Younger, Sullivan, Huddy, and McDonald, with responses provided by Mr.
Hamilton...
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
President Younger acknowledged the large group in attendance tonight; and announced that
although Council is willing to hear everyone who wishes to speak regarding the "Welcoming City"
issue, he would "pause" Public Recognition after approximately 30 minutes to allow City business
to be conducted, and then Public Recognition will reopen to continue receiving comments.
Kyle Ulrich informed the Council about his firsthand experience with aggressive panhandling and
criminal activity downtown; and thanked Police Chief Strachan for hearing his concerns earlier
this evening. President Younger responded that this issue was formally addressed in the
budget by increasing the Police presence downtown.
Karen Vargas asked for Council to support students' efforts in promoting inclusion in Bremerton
which will include a "Charter for Compassion" in the near future.
Terry Fessner respectively requested a response from Mayor Lent regarding his letter dated
30 -days ago; and expressed concerns about downtown.
Jane Rebelowski hoped Kitsap Transit would focus on providing weekend bus service to
residents.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
Page 2of5
Police Chief Steve Strachan discussed the Bremerton Police Department's Policy No. 428
which states that law enforcement does not participate in immigration enforcement, does not ask
individuals about immigration status, established that any detention is based only on criminal
activity; and emphasized that the Police Department will continue working hand in hand with
Kitsap Immigrant Assistance Center on these same issues.
Comments in support of a proposed "Welcoming City" Resolution were provided by Althea
Paulson; Daryl Daugs; Adam Brockus; Dr. Karen Bolton; Airen Lydick; Denise Frey, Alec
Matias; Nancy Williams Painter; Eli Oldfield; and Chuck Tanner...
President Younger announced that Public Recognition will be re -opened after the Consent
Agenda and General Business.
06:49:00 M/S/F (Davis/Daugs) Move to set aside the rules of the day; and to continue public
comment after conclusion of City Business (Motion requires 2/3 vote in favor of Motion):
Voted In Favor of Motion — Daugs, Wheeler, Davis, Huddy
Voted Opposed to Motion — Sullivan, McDonald, Younger
Motion failed: 4 -Yes; 3 -No
Council then returned to the business portion of the meeting
CONSENT AGENDA
6A — Claims & Check Register: Check Numbers 372146 through 372509, and EFT -16993
through EFT- 17083 in the amount of $3,909,194.88; Regular Payroll (Pay Out) for the
pay period ending January 31, 2017 in the amount of $89,019.52; Regular Payroll for the
pay period ending February 15, 2017 in the amount of $765,999.21; Regular Payroll (Pay
Out) for the pay period ending February 15, 2017 in the amount of $3,239.49; and Retiree
Payroll for the pay period ending February 28, 2017 in the amount of $52,808.08
6B— Minutes of Joint Planning Workshop — February 11, 2017
6C — Minutes of Special Meeting — February 13, 2017
6D— Minutes of Study Session — February 22, 2017
6E— Contract Award to Utility Pipeline Contractors, Inc. of Gig Harbor, WA for the Kitsap Lake
Interceptor Siphon Replacement Project
6F — Resolution No. 3285 to amend Right -of -Way Deed for Tahuyeh Lake Road NW & Gold
Creek Road NW
6G — Amend Consulting Agreement with BMcConsulting, LLC to extend the term through June
30, 2017
06:53:45 M/S/C/U (Sullivan/McDonald) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented.
GENERAL BUSINESS
7A — INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE KITSAP CONSERVATION DISTRICT FOR THE
RAIN GARDEN PROJECT: Teresa Smith, with the Water Resources Department, explained
that Bremerton's rain garden project will provide technical and financial support to property owners
for installation of rain gardens and other low impact development in the Anderson Cove basin to
avoid Combined Sewer Overflows during storm events using green infrastructure.
The Kitsap Conservation District will be contracted to complete site visits, designs, and installations
because of their extensive rain garden experience and proven success with similar programs.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
Page 3 of 5
Selected recipients will receive rain garden excavation, construction, and materials. The landowner
will contribute the cost of a portion of the plants and their own labor to the extent possible. The
project will offer resources to teach people to care for their rain gardens and other plantings using
natural methods.
There were no comments from the public...
06:56:57 Motion was made by Daugs and seconded by Sullivan... Comments were provided by
Daugs...
06:57:40 M/S/C/U (Daugs/Sullivan) Move to approve the Interlocal Agreement with the Kitsap
Conservation District; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with
substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
7B — AMEND THE AUTHORIZED POSITIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT, AUTHORIZE THE HIRING OF THE BUILDING DEVELOPMENT
SPECIALIST III ON MAY 1, 2017, AND INCREASE THE 2017 PERSONNEL BUDGET BY
$24,806: Andrea Spencer, Department of Community Development Director, proposed to
modify the authorized positions within the Building Division from (2) Building Development
Specialist II (BDS-II) positions to (1) BDS-II and (1) BDS-III.
Following the discussion of permitting inspection workload at the study session on February 22,
2017, the City Council directed staff to additionally modify the proposal to change the hire date of
the BDS-III from mid -year (July 1) to May 1, 2017. This modification resulted in a budget increase
from $6,350 to $24,806.
The cost breakdowns are as follows: The 2017 Budget authorized the hiring of a BDS-II on July 1.
The upgrade from BDS-II to BDS-III will cost the City an additional $6,350.
The monthly BDS-III costs are estimated at $9,228. If the BDS-III is hired two months earlier than
anticipated (May 1 instead of July 1), then the additional cost will be $18,456.
Total costs: $6,350 (position upgrade costs) + $18,456 (additional 2 months of BDS-III) _ $24,806
Terry Fessner expressed concerns about budget amendments; and emphasized that there are
many issues besides the Council Goals that need attention, including water and sewer
infrastructure and protecting the remaining large retailers like car dealerships who provide
considerable revenue for the City.
07:03:05 Motion was made by Huddy and seconded by Davis... Comments and questions were
provided by Huddy; Davis; Daugs; with responses provided by Ms. Spencer...
07:09:13 M/S/C (Huddy/Davis) Move to amend the authorized positions in the Department of
Community Development from (2) BDS II positions to (1) BDS II and (1) BDS III; authorize the
hiring of the BDS III on May 1, 2017; and increase the 2017 personnel budget by $24,806.
Voted in Favor of Motion: McDonald, Wheeler, Davis, Huddy, Sullivan, Younger
Voted Opposed to Motion: Daugs
Motion carried: 6 -Yes; 1 -No
PUBLIC RECOGNITION (Continued...)
Comments in support of the "Welcoming City" Resolution were provided by Pastor Pamela
Armstrong; Jennifer Chamberlin; Nolle Pritchard; Laura Rarlg; and George Fine...
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
Page 4 of 5
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Pat Sullivan encouraged people to participate in the next Lions Park Work Party on Saturday,
March 11 from 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM; announced that applications will be accepted for the
vacancy on the City's Audit Committee through Wednesday, March 15; thanked Bremerton
Citizen Auxiliary Patrol (BCAP) Volunteer Tom Danaher for a wonderful ride -along opportunity;
encouraged anyone interested in becoming a volunteer to contact Community Resource Office
Joe Sexton at (360) 473-5231 or visit the City's website for more information; established that the
City's Police Department already has a policy in place that protects immigrants; and affirmed that
she would uphold the laws of the United States per her oath.
Leslie Daugs was pleased that Council would be re -opening Public Recognition for a continued
discussion regarding the resolution; and shared her family's personal history of immigrating to the
United States from the Philippines.
Jerry McDonald provided an update on the Spyglass Apartments and 4t" Street/Quincy Square
Projects; welcomed the USS Turner Joy back to the waterfront; and encouraged people to visit
the City's website to view and share the new "Bremerton Community Video Tour'.
Greg Wheeler will ask Council to revisit the issue of the "Welcoming City" Resolution in a public
forum; and thanked the people who came to express their opinions and share their values.
Dino Davis believed that the public here tonight have helped move this conversation forward;
shared his family's immigration story; and hoped that the City will take action to help protect basic
human dignity.
Richard Huddy reported on a Community Roundtable hosted by King 5 News at Bremerton High
School on February 15; attended the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) City Action Days
Conference in Olympia to promote legislative priorities and meet with Legislators; visited the West
Sound Business Expo; expressed concerns about the proposed relocation of Harrison Hospital
to Silverdale; welcomed more discussion on a resolution that was truly inclusive; and shared
photos of the USS Turner Joy as it returned from Lake Union to Bremerton.
Eric Younger expressed the concerns he had regarding Mr. Garrido's proposed resolution;
believed that the key question is whether to make a statement on the national level or to embrace
the community; and emphasized that reaching consensus among Council Members might be
possible; and that the resolution might be expanded to include other people besides immigrants
and without using the label "Welcoming City".
Council recessed at 8:09 PM to meet for a 15 -Minute Executive Session to discuss "Potential
Litigation" and a "Real Estate Acquisition" No action was anticipated...
With no further business, President Younger adjourned the Council Meeting at 8:25 PM
Prepared and Submitted by:
CHRISTINE GRENIER
Council Assistant
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
Page 5 of 5
APPROVED by the City Council on the 15th day of March, 2017.
ERIC YOUNGER, City Council President
ATTEST:
SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk
EY:SC:ls:cg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 6C
SUBJECT: Minutes of Study Session — Study Session Date: N/A
March 8, 2017 COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017
Department: City Council
Presenter: Council President
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: Attached is the summary of the City Council Study Session on March 8, 2017.
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/A
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: x❑ No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: 0 ConsentAgenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny
Form Updated 12/15/15
❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
A Study Session of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the Council
Conference Room of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER, 345 6t" Street, Bremerton,
Washington, Wednesday, March 8, 2017, at 5:00 PM, with Council President Eric Younger
presiding. Council Members present were Richard Huddy, Dino Davis, Greg Wheeler, Jerry
McDonald, Leslie Daugs, and Pat Sullivan. Lori Smith, Legislative Assistant, was present to
provide staff support.
President Younger emphasized that the Study Session was open to the public but there would
be no opportunities for input or participation; and announced that approved items by Council will
be placed on the March 15, 2017 Council Meeting Agenda or as indicated...
A. NO PRESENTATION PLANNED — The following items are budgeted items or subjects that
have been raised with the appropriate Council Committee Members...
1. Confirm Appointment of Jaime Forsyth to the City of Bremerton Arts Commission
Consent Agenda
2. Resolution to reaffirm City Council's support of the City of Bremerton Employee
Wellness Program ConsentAgenda
3. Purchase of four (4) 2017 Ford Interceptors for the Fire Department from Columbia Ford
of Longview, WA Consent Agenda
4. Purchase of one (1) 2017 Ford F-550 4WD Flatbed Truck for the Forestry Department
from Columbia Ford of Longview, WA ConsentAgenda
5. Purchase of eight (8) Wireless Mobile Column Lifts for Equipment Services from NW Lift
& Equipment LLC of Hillsboro, OR ConsentAgenda
6. Contract Award to Michels Corporation for the 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation Project
Consent Agenda
7. Accept US Department of Transportation Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Innovative Safety Grant; and Approve WSDOT Local Agency Agreement for the West
Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Projects General
Business
8. Professional Services Agreement with HDR, Inc. for Design of Innovative Safety
Improvements for West Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety
Projects Consent Agenda
B. BRIEFINGS & FULL PRESENTATIONS
1. Briefing by Kitsap Building Association (KBA) — Executive Vice -President Teresa
Osinski; 1St Vice President Miriam Villiard; and State Director Wayne Keffer, CGR, CAPS
Information Only
2. Resolution to accept and approve proposed Annexation Proceedings for territory
adjacent to Corbet Drive General Business
President Younger called a recess from 7:00 to 7:10 PM...
C. GENERAL COUNCIL BUSINESS
o Audit Committee Briefing (2/27/17 Special Meeting) — Chair Pat Sullivan
0 Public Works Committee Briefing (3/07/17 Meeting) — Chair Dino Davis
City Council Study Session Minutes
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
Page 2 of 2
o Public Safety & Parks Committee Briefing (3/08/17 Meeting) — Vice Chair Greg Wheeler
o Other General Council Business was briefly discussed including an announcement for a
Reception for Fire Chief Candidates on Thursday, March 16 from 5:00 to 7:00 PM at Fire
Station 1; and a Special Meeting on the 51h Wednesday this month, March 29 at 5:00 PM
in the First Floor Meeting Chambers for a Study Session to allow Council Members
dedicated time to study and discuss the merits of a proposed Resolution related to
designating the City of Bremerton as a "welcoming city". Since this will be a Study
Session, no public comment will be taken during the meeting.
With no further business, President Younger adjourned the Council Study Session at 8:30 PM.
Prepared and Submitted by:
LORI SMITH, Legislative Assistant
APPROVED by the City Council on the 15th day of March, 2017.
Eric Younger, Council President
ATTEST:
Shannon L. Corin, City Clerk
EY:SC:ls:cg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Confirm Appointment of
Jaime Forsyth to the City of Bremerton
Arts Commission
Study Session Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
March 8, 2017
March 15, 2017
Executive
Mayor Lent
(360) 473-5266
SUMMARY: The Mayor is seeking confirmation of the appointment of Jaime Forsyth to the Arts
Commission. She will be fulfilling an unexpired term due to the resignation of Eugene Brennan. The
term will expire May 1, 2020.
ATTACHMENTS: Application to the Commission is available in the Mayor's Office.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: o Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to confirm the appointment of Jaime Forsyth to the Arts Commission with the term expiring May
1, 2020.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve
Form Updated 01/07/15
❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 3286
to reaffirm City Council's support for the
City of Bremerton Employee Wellness
Program
Study Session Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
6E
March 8, 2017
March 15, 2017
Human Resources
Lisa Garland
(360) 473-5347
SUMMARY: The City of Bremerton Employee Wellness Program was established to support and
improve the City employees' wellness at work and home.
The Employee Wellness Program Committee will be pursuing the AWC WellCity Award for 2019.
One of the first steps in this process is to create a resolution or to publicly reaffirm a resolution
already in place. Resolution No. 3044 adopted in 2007 is being repealed and replaced by the
proposed Resolution. The Resolution shows and reaffirms City Council's support of the Employee
Wellness Program.
ATTACHMENTS: (1) Resolution No. 3286 (2) Resolution No. 3044 dated 12/19/2007
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): none
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: o Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to adopt Resolution No. 3286, reaffirming City Council's support of the City Employee Wellness
Program.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve
Form Updated 01/07/15
❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
RESOLUTION NO. 3286
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City
of Bremerton, Washington, reaffirming its support of the
City's Employee Wellness Program.
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that wellness programs increase
participants' awareness of their health options by providing access to education and activities
and motivates and empowers employees to make positive health -enhancing, lifestyle choices;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that improvement to all employees
health through active workplace health promotion, activities and education results in better
moral, reduces sick leave usage and enhances productivity and performance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of decreasing the use of
health care services under provider health benefits plans and improving employee health; and
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2007, the City Council passed Resolution No. 3044
supporting the City of Bremerton Employee Wellness Program which includes a Wellness
Committee consisting of City employees; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to reaffirm its support of the City of
Bremerton Employee Wellness Program aimed at providing education to prevent illness and injuries,
promoting better employee health and morale through activities and reducing absenteeism; NOW
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION]. Resolution No. 3044 is hereby repealed and replaced in its entirety
with this resolution.
SECTION 2. City Council hereby expresses and reaffirms its support of the City
of Bremerton Employee Wellness Program and agrees to participate with City employees in the
program.
SECTION 3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences
of this resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and
effect.
SECTION 4. L ective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage
Employee Wellness Program
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this
day of )2017.
ERIC YOUNGER, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk
R:\Legal\Legal\ResolutionsAM\Employee Wellness Program UPDATED 03.08.2017.doe
2
Employee Wellness Program
RESOLUTION NO. 3344
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, supporting the Employee Wellness
Program.
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of raising awareness and
empowering employees to make positive health -enhancing lifestyle choices; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that improvement to employee health
can result in better morale, reduced sick leave usage and enhance productivity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of decreasing the use of
health care services under provider health benefits plans; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. City Council hereby expresses its support of the City of Bremerton
Wellness Program.
SECTION 2. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 3. Elkaive Date, This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this _Zq__��
day of >AV4XC '2007.
2_
WILL MAUPIN, C(uncil Prt<ldent
0 R A. LUI3TM1CH_,r—it__
y_XU_4� CAff_0L ETEN, City Ckrk
Wellness Committee
DATE SUBMITTED: 12/6/07
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
--7
BILL # t9 /
'30
SUBJECT: Resolution No. w- in Committee Meeting Date: December 12, 2007
Support of the Employee Wellness Program COUNCIL MEETING Date: December 19, 2007
Department: City Council
Presenter: Nick Wofford,
Council Member
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: A resolution of the City Council to express their support of the City of Bremerton
Wellness Program for its employees.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: Council President
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT: 0.Y CONSENT AGENDA
GENERAL BUSINESSE]
PUBLIC HEARING ❑
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve Resolution No. Iff-, supporting the
Employee Wellness Program.
COUNCIL ACTION: P,Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue nNoAction
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Purchase of four (4) 2017 Ford
Interceptors for the Fire Department from
Columbia Ford of Longview, WA
Study Session Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
6F
March 8, 2017
March 15, 2017
Fire
Pat McGanney, Fire
Chief
Phone: (360) 473-5380
SUMMARY: The Fire Department is proposing to purchase four Fire Department staff vehicles. The
total cost for the four (4) vehicles is $139,112.67 including Washington State sales tax. The Fire
Department is utilizing State Contract No. 05916 for the purchase.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Quote from Columbia Ford 2) Justification for replacement
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): This is budgeted through the Public Safety Bond.
The total cost for the four (4) vehicles is $139,112.67.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: o Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the purchase of four (4) Ford Interceptors in the amount of $139,112.67, including
Washington State sales tax, from Columbia Ford of Longview.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve
Form Updated 01/07/15
❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
� M
0000
rn
LL a'
to
Q
s o
E I 5
c
LI) U r,
L:
t
Q)
c
U
c
M
E
O
c
c
0
N
N
�o
oL
O
3
CD o
O
W a)
N N
LL Q
ro 'v
G
U c
Z
O u
CD
E
Lu Y
Lu m
m O.
c 'm
O E
Lu
N
c
m
O
aL O o
V O O
a` ° �o
CO M
K
l!J O �
H}
N O O
U O O
00
a`
c `fl
O �
o
c �
o �
C C U
al U a
0
r a.
� U �
U C L
O 6 O
G U 0
c O)U
C= �
E c
m Lu a�
m �
3
o
a
c
0 'L 0
0 m
J i o
N L Q)Nc
u, _� G
Q o0
O L u
� 3 0
� :aJ
raM o
Q) 0 a)
Q j O
Fa
MR:
C: m
a,
f�
�'�
O
a
Lnco Q 3
Lu
v 1 O
a)
> = 2 )
DLn
O T
wo��
@ a
� o T d
O V U
In
07 O
M ce
L 3:
c c _rn
CO: v -
o E �
Q o T,�o
cow
M
CL Ln m
Li C1 T: Y
c ) - � 3 co
c LL•- a °-
a
-' 3 '
c
L u a c •c
of M @@��
p -a MO TV a
Q)ro
LL = = N E
ra c
a p 0 o u L
O N LL m C O
-4 M
d o 0
-0 b
0
V O O
y O O
O N N
4
/1
r
o0o
>1
V
N
�
u-
0 O
~
U
�
�
L
�
z
�
�
o
o
w
o
2
rn
O >66 Mk.D
ul
0
L-
0
0)
0) r—
N
U)
O N
f6
.0
O
N
L
�
Za) a
U�cU�
�Oy
v
JLL G
m
N N
L
LuY
r � Q V
—=a--+
V
O�
Z LL a a >
N
�C
C
O
N
0
c
L
�
E
E
z
Z
40-
4
L
�
Q
N
G
ami
3
c
p
a
fa
cs
V
N
V
U
i
E
s
V%
L!
ti of I-� V of
>
F-
U
� M
0000
rn
LL a'
to
Q
s o
E I 5
c
LI) U r,
L:
t
Q)
c
U
c
M
E
O
c
c
0
N
N
�o
oL
O
3
CD o
O
W a)
N N
LL Q
ro 'v
G
U c
Z
O u
CD
E
Lu Y
Lu m
m O.
c 'm
O E
Lu
N
c
m
O
aL O o
V O O
a` ° �o
CO M
K
l!J O �
H}
N O O
U O O
00
a`
c `fl
O �
o
c �
o �
C C U
al U a
0
r a.
� U �
U C L
O 6 O
G U 0
c O)U
C= �
E c
m Lu a�
m �
3
o
a
c
0 'L 0
0 m
J i o
N L Q)Nc
u, _� G
Q o0
O L u
� 3 0
� :aJ
raM o
Q) 0 a)
Q j O
Fa
MR:
C: m
a,
f�
�'�
O
a
Lnco Q 3
Lu
v 1 O
a)
> = 2 )
DLn
O T
wo��
@ a
� o T d
O V U
In
07 O
M ce
L 3:
c c _rn
CO: v -
o E �
Q o T,�o
cow
M
CL Ln m
Li C1 T: Y
c ) - � 3 co
c LL•- a °-
a
-' 3 '
c
L u a c •c
of M @@��
p -a MO TV a
Q)ro
LL = = N E
ra c
a p 0 o u L
O N LL m C O
-4 M
d o 0
-0 b
0
V O O
y O O
O N N
4
C)
CD
C)
C)
O
C)
C)
C)
C)
CD
C)
C)
CD
CD
C)
CD
C)
0
C?
CR
o
O
o
CR
0
0
0
C?
0
0
o
O
O
C!
C)
k.0
(N
00
N
[Y-
lD
1-
110
N
(Ij
7
14-
N
C)
1-
(14
00
1-1
r"
00
0)
C)
r�
CY)
Ln
ko
00
CY)
r4
m
kc�Ln
N
M1-1
C)
'A
CD
C)
M
:��
.-i
Ni&
4j)-
-b�
I -z
-41
_-z
ir,
-Z
j)-
trl
4j)-
j)-
4j)-
j)-
�
4Pr
-bP,
C)
CD
CD
C)
CD
C)
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
C)
C)
C)
C)
C)
C)
O
CR
CR
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CR
O
O
O
O
O
C)
1-
00
Il
00
to
(7,
-4
00
CO
-A
I -q
CO
Ln
'A
00
C)
N
00
ko
0)
m
Ln
U)
ry)
m
r,
Lr)
rl)
m
I-
r1i
Ln
N
4Pr
All)-
ld)-
N
Ln
r4
N
N
rl)
+q -
IL
-b�
Iii-
j)-
(1)
co
m
ui
E
m0)
(U
-14
u
a)
F-
m
E
c
0
Q)
a -
LU
ko
(v
>
a)
c
>%
>
0
LL
0
0
a)
[2
0
(U
Oa)
a)
0
O-
0
0
fu
uw
.0
U
LU
of a
0
u
2!
0)
fu
a)
LU
ry)
3:
CmE
�o
a)
C:
cu
0
ru
ru
a)
0
U
:3
0
u
cl
>
D
Lu
40-
0
u
u
0
m
fu
0
0
-M
U
0
E 'd
0
(n
CL
3:
a)
C:
(a
Cl.
c
ui
0
_m
kD
CM
0
0 u
<
a)
Ln
0
Ln
ko
M
_lz
S CL
0—
a)
a)Ln
a)
I=
C:
U
ru
0
M
a)
-0
Ln
Ln
fu
a)
0
CMa)
_0
0)
-0
!E
a) a)
-0
Ne
=3
0
cr-
U
.F CL
=3
70
-2 C:
u
>
J--
x
a)
_0
V)
a)
U c
C: 0
ru
n CD
a)
a)
Ln
zpg
D
=3
_0
m
c
Q.
Va)
u
, Ln
ko
>
a)
ru
E
C
2 o
C
6
C:F
0 �
2
C:
0
01
0
=3 V�
-'Z
4:1 0
Ln
cl
-0 21
a)
Ln
z ��
Ln
0 U)
a)
.21 -c3
a)
m
a)
0
a)
70
E
[2 u
fu
Q)
_0
-2
E
>
0)0)
CM
m CL
,,e Ln
0) C:
fu 0
a) C:
fu
P M
0
Q)
u
U -
m
u
m e
-2
a)
-0
Mn
a)
70
19
40
a- 0
>t3
Ln
=3
±2
0
CL
t
a)
:2 0-
a)
> 0.
rz
m
Ln
0
U)
u
-0 a)
tn E
ol
�,
a)
(V
01
En
ra
-2
-0
m
LL C:
-0 OC
a)
a) a)
V)
c
0)
(v
m
•m
0-0
C
0
0 u
LL u
0)-T
m
Ul
-0
a)
�o
m
a)
-
0
>
(v
E
CL
2�
(n 0)
(n
ru
0
a)
(n
(v
_0
=3m
-
2
ru
T
,
Z3 E a
5; E
fu -
_0
x
a) =3
u
0) Ln
m
C:
uw
7U CL
u
N
Ln
I a)
CD
C:
a)
0
E
En
a)
T
V)
V
-0 N
OU
u 0
a) t
Os
u
V)
0
a)
Ln
:3 -0
(D
C:
0
LU a) zt:�
-0
-
0
a)
OL
CD
40 m
U)
U LO
_j
U- C:
u
'I
73
-
fu
a)
m
ru Cm
I a) u
72
0
LO
a)
U
0
>
- 0
u
m
m
2
m 0
m
E 00
a)
a)
a) 00-
a
a)
0
(n
fu
1:;
Ch
—
u a)
V)
0
C:
n
(U
=3
9L
0
E m
En
_0
0
ro
u
E
ro
a)
, m
70 Q) 0
�4 a)
Ne u
0-
(U
Z3
21
m
a) a)
E
C: = ce
2 (V
0 LA
- OL
-
0
-
u
R
=>
3�
0
u
(U
0 (V
C: 0
0
0
-0
C:
U
a)
u
(D
u
E
.4-
m
— Z
ol
'0
k.0
N
3:
u
CD
mo
0
0-
OU
C: r- c
C
r- a)
f6
a)
(D
0
>
u
uj
�o
C)
0 cn 0
U
0
u E
a)
_0
0
2
OL
0
Id
a)•
0
0
C:
m
a)
LL
U)
_0
V)
0)0)
ate') t
w
U)
a)
u
Ln
Ln
m
CD
CD
0
(v
-j
0)
0
LU u)
0
M
E i2
E
d.E
LU =
(D
-4
.
CD
0)
C:
'n .0
U)
u
LU
-i
0
m C:
M
U)
0
0
F
�o
C:
(3)
_0
C3)
0
m
0
C:
a)
a)
a)
E
CL
Ln
>
a)
(u a) U
C: 70
a)
a)
fu
ca.
E
ty
r
u
Q)
a) 0
2
U-
2� -0
E C: w
Cc a)
0
t
e
fu
fo
a)
Cl.
CL
Ln
19
a)
:3
LU -
Fn
ru
m
Ln
a)
�.e :L3
a) 0�
C:
0
0
0-0
Z3
u (U
a) C: a)
Q) a)
Z 2
cv
U')
a)
E
a) a)
C:
u
a)
- 0
0
u
u
U
u
C:
C:
(v -
-0 C
fu
2
M
E
0
u
0)
V)
>
(3)
fu Ln
C_-
Q)
OO
ac' 4-
0 o
CL u
0
in Q)
a)
ce
U')
0
M
0
0 c
a- a)
CIO
Ln
(1)
C!
(1)
Q
0
U')
>
M
V-
Ln
co
a)
Ln
110
CO
m
N
r1i
Ln
00
CD
I;r
r�
-4
1-1
1-(
-1
1-1
N
N
r1l
rlj
m
m
LO
to
00
?
?
C?
?
?
?
?
?
?
91
?
?
?
C?
ko
�
LD
lo
ko
I'D
ID
lo
ko
ko
-10
ko
k.0
1.0
ko
110
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
=0
CD
CD
CD
C)
CD
CD
CD
C)
U)
C?
Ln
?
U)
9
Ln
O
Ln
C?
Ln
9
Ln
1?
m
1?
Ln
1?
Ln
9
Ln
C?
U)
cp
Ln
9
Ln
1?
Ln
1?
Ln
1?
M
9
C)
C)
C)
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
C)
CD
CD
CD
C)
CD
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
rq
r4
rq
rq
N
rq
N
rlj
r1i
C=)
@
\
%
\
/
§
R
%
J
7
y
+
\
\
\
\
\
~
$
2
@
G
\
\
�
Ln
k
0
rn
/
M
�
^
\3
W
k
f
0
®
\
�
\
\
)a
\
/
\
3
2
\
\
�) §
C
}
\
£
\
_
/
2
§
m
=
§
3
t
)
2
2
/®
§
f
§
>
0
cuƒ
/
§
f
)
)
p
/
E
\
! g
kCM
a
:
CL/
_
%
ƒ
�
»
t9
2�»
/
LU \
V)
� /
\®
d�
��
-1
m
g
2\
20[0
a
2
=
CD
E
�u
�0
ƒ
-
yg
CD -
j
a)
)
}u
7
\
j E
p
*
o?
o y
\ 2
\ w
N
/
/
%
/
ko
$
$
\
\
\
\
\
/
\
\
\
\
\
\
Pat McGanney Fire Chief
911 Park Avenue • Bremerton, WA 98337 • (360) 473-5381 • FAX (360) 473-5397
EQUIPMENT JUSTIFICATION
Date: 2/24/2017
TO: File
FROM: Pat McGanney, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: 2017 PURCHASE OF 4 FORD INTERCEPTORS
This purchase includes four 2017 Ford Interceptors for replacement of the vehicles
listed below. This purchase of vehicles was set forth in the public safety bond.
The Police Department, Public Works, or other departments may acquire the
replaced vehicles for their use.
Vehicle #
Year
Model
Miles
101
2007
Ford Escape
59,000
104
2007
Ford Escape
45,000
103
2008
Ford Escape
65,000
105
2008
Ford Escape
96,000
• Serving the Citizens of Bremerton Since 1901 •
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Purchase of one (1) 2017 Ford
F-550 4WD Flatbed Truck for the Forestry
Department from Columbia Ford of
Longview, WA
6G
Study Session Date: March 8, 2017
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15. 2017
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
PWU/ERR
Milenka Hawkins -Bates
(360) 473-5333
SUMMARY: The approved 2017 budget shows a replacement in the Forestry Department of a 1994
Chevrolet 3500 Flat Bed that is used for fire suppression. The requested replacement is a 2017 Ford
F-550 4wd Flatbed with all required options per state contract No. 05916 in the amount of $59,509.48
including Washington State sales tax. The authorized dealer is Columbia Ford, Longview WA. The
replaced vehicle will be removed from the fleet.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Washington State Contract 05916,quote 2017-2-620; 2) Justification
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Budgeted within the 510 fund at $40,000
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: o Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the purchase of a 2017 Ford F-550 4WD Flatbed Truck with all required options per
State Contract No. 05916 in the amount of $59,509.48 including Washington State sales tax.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve
Form Updated 01/07/15
❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Charles Ernst " �u le� �G
From: NOREPLY@des.wa.gov
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 9:42 AM
To: Charles Ernst
Cc: Philip.Saunders@des.wa.gov
Subject: Vehicle Quote **2017-2-620 - BREMERTON, CITY OF - 21801
Vehicle Quote Number: 2017-2-620 Create Purchase Request View organization purchase requests
This is a quote only. You must create a purchase request to order this vehicle(s)
Contract & Dealer Information
Contract #: 05916
Dealer: Coumbia Ford (W403)
700 7th Avenue
Longview WA 98632
Organization Information
Organization: BREMERTON, CITY OF - 21801
Email: charles.emst@d.bremerton.wa.us
Color Options
Dealer Contact: Marie Tellinghiusen
Dealer Phone: (360) 423-4321 Ext: 187
Dealer Email: mallet@colford.com
Oxford White - 1
Tax Exempt: N
Vehicle Options _W
Order Code Option Description2017-0914-0012017 Ford F550 4WD Cab & Chassis, Regular Cab, 145WB, 60CA, DRW, 18,000# GVWR
(F5H/660A/145WB)
2017-0914-013 GVWR Maximum (19,500# GVWR, 4.88 RAR with Limited Slip, High -Capacity Trailer Tow Package)
(Increases GCW from 31,000 Lbs to 40,000 Lbs) (Only available with Diesel Engine)(68M/X8L/535)
Qty Unit Price Ext. Price
1 $34,541.00 $34,541.00
1 $2,484.00 $2,484.00
2017-0914-014 Alternative Engine, 6.7L 4 -Valve OHV PowerStroke V8 Turbo Diesel (B20) (Includes 4.10 RAR, Dual
1
$8,119.00
$8,119.00
750CCA Batteries, 220 -AMP Alternator) (99T/44W)
2017-0914-024 11OV/400W Outlet (includes one in -dash mounted outlet (43C)
1
$72.00
$72.00
2017-0914-033 Operator Commanded Regeneration (OCR) with Active Regeneration Inhibit (Only Available with
1
$240.00
$240.00
diesel)(98R)
2017-0914-037 Tires, Alternative, Max Traction (225/70Rx19.5G BSW, Front and Rear)(Not recommended for over -the-
1
$205.00
$205.00
road applications; could incur irregular front tire wear and/or NVH)(TGB)
2017-0914-049 Cab Steps, Regular Cab (6a€ Angular Black Running Boards)(18B)
1
$307.00
$307.00
2017-0914-054 Engine Block Heater (41H)
1
$72.00
$72.00
2017-0914-055 Backup Alarm (76C)
1
$133.00
$133.00
1
2017-0914-056 Skid Plate, Transfer Case (4x4 Only) (41P) 1 $96.00 $96.00
2017-0914-057 Power Equipment Group (Regular/Extended Cabs) [Includes manual -folding, manually -telescoping trailer 1 $1,173.00 $1,173.00
tow mirrors with power heated glass and integrated clearance lamps/tum signals, power windows,
power door locks, remote keyless entry) (Includes (4) RKE Fobs w/ Integrated Key) (901.154K)
2017-0914-060 SYNC with MyFord Touch Voice -Activated Communications, includes 911 Assist and AppUnk, one (1) USB 1 $350.00 $350.00
port, compass feature will display in instrumentation center) (must also order XL Value Package #96V)
(91M)
2017-0914-061 XL Value Package (includes 4.2" center stack screen AM/FM/CD/MP3 #585, Cruise Control #525, chrome
front bumper)(96V)
2017-0914-063 Rearview Camera and Prep Kit (includes loose camera, wiring bundle, electrochromic mirror w/ video
display) (Must also order AM/FM/CD #585 or XL Value Package #96V) (872)
2017-0914-200 200-299 Dealer Installed Options (12-month/12,000 mile warranty)
1 $690.00 $690.00
1 $396.00 $396.00
1 $0.00 $0.00
2017-0914-206 Undercoating (DLR) 1 $155.00 $155.00
2017-0914-207 Service Manual, CD (DLR) 1 $221.00 $221.00
2017-0914-208 Service Wiring Diagram, Paper (DLR) 1 $87.00 $87.00
2017-0914-209 Spotlight, 6" Clear Lens, Pillar Mounted, Driver Side (Unity) (DLR) 1 $350.00 $350.00
2017-0914-306 Platform Bed, 9 Foot (60CA, DRW)(inc. 40in Heavy Duty Weld on Bulkhead, Wood Deck, LED marker 1 $3,834.00 $3,834.00
lights, ICC bumper) (Knap PVMX-93C) (ABW306)
2017-0914-317 Alternative Smooth Steel Deck in lieu of wood deck (requires Knapheide platform or stakeside bed) 1 $220.00 $220.00
(ABW317)
2017-0914-319 2" Receiver Hitch w/ 7 -Way Flat RV Plug, Class V (non -hoisted beds) *7 -Way round or 6 -Way round 1 $605.00 $605.00
plugs available at n/c, must specify at time of order (ABW319)
2017-0914-499 Install Rearview Camera (Must order OEM Rearview Camera which is shipped loose from factory) 1 $96.00 $96.00
(INSCAM) (ABW499)
Quote Totals
.,
Total Vehicles: 1
Sub Total: $54,446.00
Quote Tia ' $a6, 465.02
q ,3%0 §l0%3.40
TYFWL, 5q, 50q , `t8
Vehicle Standard Specifications And Additional Information
Vehicle: 2017 Ford F550 4WD Cab & Chassis, 18,000# GVWR
Contract #: 05916 - Motor Vehicles
Dealer: Coumbia Ford
Vehicle Standard Specifications And Additional Information
Page 1 of 2
Specification Description
Specification
2017 Ford F550 4WD Cab & Chassis, Regular Cab,
145 -inch Wheelbase, 60 -inch Cab -to -Axle, Dual
Rear Wheel
F5H/660A/145WB
18,000# GVWR
STANDARD
6.8L 3 -Valve Gas SOHC EFI NA V10 Gas Engine
(includes CNG/Propane Gaseous Prep: hardened
engine intake valves and valve seats)
(99V)
Transmission, Automatic 6 -Speed TorgShift
Automatic Transmission w/ SelectShift (6R140)
(NEW)
(44P)
Air Bags, Driver and Front Passenger
STANDARD
Air Conditioning
STANDARD
240 AMP Alternator
STANDARD
750CCA Battery
STANDARD
4.88 Rear Axle Ratio, non -limited slip (X48)
STANDARD
Brakes, HD Power 4 Wheel, Anti -Locking System
STANDARD
Cigarette Lighter or Auxiliary Power Source
STANDARD
Tilt Steering Wheel
STANDARD
Dome Lamp and Dual Map Lights, Front Row
(Crew Cab includes front & rear)
STANDARD
Door Trim Panels with armrest/grab handle and
reflector
STANDARD
Dual Rear Wheels
STANDARD
Floor Covering, Vinyl
STANDARD
40 -Gallon Fuel Tank
STANDARD
Gauges: Oil Pressure, Coolant and Transmission
Temperature, Tachometer, and Fuel
STANDARD
Glass, Tinted All Around
STANDARD
Headliner, Non Metallic
STANDARD
Manual Door Locks, Front Door Lock Cylinders, (4)
Keys
STD/DEALER
Mirrors: Manually telescoping two-way fold trailer
tow mirrors with manual glass
STANDARD
Manual Windows
STANDARD
TTA
https:Hfortress.wa.gov/ga/apps/CARSNehicleSpecifications.aspx?id=633 2/17/2017
Vehicle Standard Specifications And Additional Information
Page 2 of 2
Seats: Vinyl 40/20/40 split bench w/ center armrest,
cupholder and storage, driver side manual lumbar
Maximum Factory Cooling — Radiator, Engine Oil,
Transmission
STANDARD
Radio, AM/FM (Factory Installed)
STANDARD
Shocks, HD springs (Front and Rear)
STANDARD
Steering, Power
STANDARD
225/70Rx19.5G BSW ALL -SEASON (TFB)
TFB
Wipers, Intermittent
STANDARD
Trailer Wiring - 7 wire harness w/ relays, blunt cut
and labelled
STANDARD
Headlamps - Dual Beam Jewel Effect Halogen
STANDARD
Roof Marker/Clearance Lamps
STANDARD
Front Tow Hooks
STANDARD
Upfitter Switches (6 located in overhead console)
STANDARD
AutoLamp (with On/Off Hadlamps) with Rainlamp
Wiper Activated Headlamps
STANDARD
2.3" Productivity Screen in Instrument Cluster
STANDARD
Daytime Running Lights (On/Off Configurable)
STANDARD
Stabilizer Bars, Front and Rear
STANDARD
Rear Auxiliary Springs
STANDARD
Oil Minder System (Gas Engines)
STANDARD
Factory Warranty, 3 years/36,000 miles, Bumper -to-
Bumper Limited Warranty
STANDARD
Factory Warranty, 5 years/60,000 miles, Gasoline
Powertrain Limited Warranty
STANDARD
Factory Warranty, 5 years/100,000 miles,
PowerStroke Diesel Limited Warranty
STANDARD
Ground Clearance
8.4"
Tire chain compatible as equipped above
Yes/Chains
60-120 Days to Deliver after receipt of order
STANDARD
Exterior Paint Colors (M=Metallic): Oxford White,
Ingot Silver M, Caribou M, Blue Jean M, Magnetic
M, Race Red, Shadow Black
STANDARD
Extra Cost VSO Exterior Paint Colors: School Bus
Yellow, Vermillion Red, Green Gem
OPTIONAL
https://fortress.wa.gov/ga/apps/CARSNehicleSpecifications.aspx?id=633 2/17/2017
0
v
0
Xm
Q
m
v
0
N_
00
(h
O
N
m
�Z
CO
T
O
C)
'o
Z
O
1
U
LL
U)
1
Z
W
n�
li
W
r
O
N
ti
N
m
m
i
Li IL
2
0
LL
i
LL
L
O
Ln
Ln
LL
LL
U
U E
(II �
N
N N
0 i.± 7
O M
N QU
N
� � o
v C
S
v �
� V O
� 7 �
i d O
O
LO
Lc)
LL 1 m
LL
O
O O
LO
LL co
r
O O
N O N
V p
N
S
V
LU
C
N s rn
s 0
H > o
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Purchase of eight Wireless
Mobile Column Lifts for Equipment Services
from NW Lift & Equipment of Hillsboro, OR
Study Session Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
6H
March 8, 2017
March 15, 2017
PWU/ERR
Milenka Hawkins -Bates
(360) 473-5333
SUMMARY: The approved 2017 budget for ERR includes replacement of six heavy vehicle column
lifts. The department has selected for replacement two sets of four wireless mobile columns in the
amount of $78,257.64 including Washington state sales tax. Staff will be utilizing Washington State
Contract No. 05316. The current lifts will go to auction or will be traded in.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Quote from NW Lift & Equipment 2) Photo
FISCAL IMPACTS: Budgeted within the 509 fund
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: o Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the purchase of eight Wireless Mobile Column Lifts per State Contract No. 05316 in
the amount of $78,257.64 including Washington state sales tax.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve
Form Updated 01/07/15
❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
A
LIFT&EQUIPMENT
February 17, 2017
City of Bremerton
Attn: Chuck Ernst
Northwest Lift & Equipment LLC
5075 SW River Road Hillsboro, Oregon 97113
Subject: Wireless Mobile Columns Quote
Dear Chuck,
Office: 503-515-8161
Cell: 503-267-1498
Thank you for choosing Northwest Lift & Equipment for your equipment needs. Per your request,
we are pleased to quote our Stertil-Koni Wireless Mobile Column lifts per the WSCA contract 905316
as follows:
2—Sets of 4 ST-1075-217WA mobile columns 66,000 lbs lifting capacity per set of 4, 24 volts DC,
with a control box on every column, fixed wheels, and adjustable forks.
YOUR WSCA COST
$ 71,796.00
Units are quoted FOB your location and includes installation and training for all your personnel.
Terms are net 30 days. Delivery is approximately 30-60 days ARO.
Installation will include off-loading equipment from the freight truck at your job site, load testing
with customer -furnished vehicle, training all personnel on safe and correct operation of the lifts,
and training all facility maintenance personnel on proper care and troubleshooting of the lifts.
Trade in value of current lifts: $ 6,000.00
Chuck, thank you for your interest in our Stertil-Koni Heavy Duty Lifts. Should you require further
information, please do not hesitate to contact me by email David2nwlift.com or on my cell phone at
503-267-1498.
Sincerely,
David Fay
NW Lift & Equipment
71,796.00
6,461.64 (9% Sales Tax)
78,257.64 Total Cost / MHB
dr
.r
Ly`
dr
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
6I
SUBJECT: Contract Award to Michels Study Session Date: March 8, 2017
Corporation for the 2017 Sewer COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017
Rehabilitation Project Department: PW&U
Presenter: Knuckey
Phone: (360) 473-2376
SUMMARY: The project will rehabilitate approximately 8249 lineal feet of sanitary sewer using the
cure -in -place -pipe (CIPP) method, reinstating approximately 101 side sewers. Kitsap County has
agreed to reimburse the city in the amount of $16,400 as its fair share of the cost of lining shared a
24 inch concrete pipe under SR3 and an inter -local agreement (ILA) has been executed with the
County for that work.
There were three bids submitted which were opened on February 23, 2017. The lowest responsive,
responsible bidder was Michels Corporation who submitted a bid in the amount of $797,622.22 which
includes sales tax.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement; 2. Kitsap County ILA; 3. Vicinity Map; and 4. Bid Tabulation.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The project is included in the 2017 Capital Budget.
The ILA with Kitsap County provides for reimbursement of $16,400.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: o Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to award the contract for the 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation to Michels Corporation in the amount
of $797,622.22, including Washington State sales tax, and authorize the Mayor to finalize and
execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve
Form Updated 01/07/15
❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
THIS AGREEMENT is dated the
CONTRACT
(page 1 of 3)
day of in the year 2017 by
and between City of Bremerton (hereinafter called CITY) and
(hereinafter called CONTRACTOR).
CITY and CONTRACTOR, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as
follows:
ARTICLE 1. WORK.
CONTRACTOR shall complete the WORK as specified or indicated in the CITY's Contract Documents
entitled 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation
ARTICLE 2. CONTRACT TIMES.
The WORK shall obtain Substantial Completion within 120 calendar days from the commencement
date stated in the Notice to Proceed. Time is of the essence as to each and every deadline set forth in
this agreement. This provision has been specifically negotiated.
ARTICLE 3. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.
CITY and the CONTRACTOR recognize that time is of the essence for this Agreement and that the CITY
will suffer financial loss if the WORK is not completed within the time specified in Article 2 herein,
plus any extensions thereof allowed in accordance with Section 1-08.8 of the Standard Specifications
which may be modified by the Special Provisions. They also recognize the delays, expense, and
difficulties involved in proving in a legal proceeding the actual loss suffered by the CITY if the WORK
is not completed on time. Accordingly, instead of requiring any such proof, the CONTRACTOR shall
pay the CITY liquidated damages in the amount of $1000 per day after the date of Substantial
Completion.
ARTICLE 4. CONTRACT PRICE.
CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR for completion of the WORK in accordance with the Contract
Documents in the amount set forth in the Bid Proposal, which shall include sales tax as provided in
Section 1-07.2(2) of the Special Provisions.
ARTICLE 5. PAYMENT PROCEDURES.
CONTRACTOR shall submit Applications for Payment in accordance with Section 1-09.9 of the
Standard Specifications which may be modified by the Special Provisions. Applications for Payment
will be processed by ENGINEER as provided in the Special Provisions
Contractor Initials
City of Bremerton February 2017
2017 Sewer Rehahilitatlon CF -1
CONTRACT
(page 2 of 3)
ARTICLE 6. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.
The Contract Documents which comprise the entire agreement between CITY and CONTRACTOR
concerning the WORK consist of this Contract and the following which are either attached or
incorporated herein by reference:
- Notice Inviting Bids,
- Bidders Checklist,
- Bid Proposal including the Proposal Forms, Information Required of Bidder, Bid Bond, and all
required certificates and affidavits,
- Performance Bond,
- Payment Bond,
- Standard Specifications,
- Amendments to the Standard Specifications,
- Appendices,
- Special Provisions,
- Contract Plans,
- Addenda numbers to , inclusive.
- Change Orders which may be delivered or issued after Effective Date of the Agreement and are
not attached hereto.
There are no Contract Documents other than those listed in this Article 6. The Contract Documents
may only be amended by Change Order as provided in Section 1-04.4 of the Standard Specifications
which may be modified by the Special Provisions.
ARTICLE 7. INDEMNIFICATION.
The CONTRACTOR and CITY acknowledge and agree that they have negotiated the following in
accordance with the requirements of RCW 4.24.115 and the CONTRACTOR specifically waives his
immunity under industrial insurance under Title 51 RCW. To the fullest extent permitted by Laws
and Regulations, the CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the CITY, ENGINEER,
their consultants, sub consultants, and the officers, directors, employees, and agents of each and any
of them, against and from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs
and attorney fees, all claims and liability arising under, by reason of, related, or incidental to the
Contract Documents or any performance of the WORK, but not from the sole negligence or willful
misconduct of the CITY and/or the ENGINEER as further defined in the Contract Documents. The
provisions of this section shall survive the termination of the contract.
Contractor Initials
City of Bremerton February 2017
2017 Sewer Rehahilitatlon CF -2
CONTRACT
(page 3 of 3)
ARTICLE 8. ASSIGNMENT
No assignment by a party hereto of any rights under or interests in the Contract Documents will be
binding on another party hereto without the written consent of the party sought to be bound; and
specifically but without limitation monies that may become due and monies that are due may not be
assigned without such consent (except to the extent that the effect of this restriction may be limited
by law), and unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no
assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under the Contract
Documents. The CITY, in its sole discretion, may refuse to allow the CONTRACTOR to assign any or
all of its duties, rights and/or responsibilities under the Agreement, except with regards to an
assignment of funds for security purposes. In the case of an assignment for security purposes the
CITY may condition its approval to the extent it deems necessary to assure that there will be adequate
funds to complete the WORK and to pay a subcontractors and suppliers.
CITY and CONTRACTOR each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to
the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect of all
covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract Documents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONTRACTOR have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY: City of Bremerton CONTRACTOR
(Signature)
By
(Printed name)
Attest
Address for giving notices
Approved as to Form:
(Signature)
(Title)
(Signature)
By
(Printed name)
Attest
[CORPORATE SEAL]
Address for giving notices
License No.
Agent for service of process:
City of Bremerton February 2017
2017 Sewer Rehahilitatlon CF -3
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KITSAP COUNTY AND
THE CITY OF BREMERTON
TO SHARE THE COST OF LINING WASTEWATER PIPING UNDER SR3
I. PREAMBLE
This Interlocal Agreement (hereafter "AGREEMENT") is by and between Kitsap
COUNTY (hereafter "COUNTY') whose principal offices are located at 614 Division
Street, Port Orchard, WA, 98366 and the CITY of Bremerton (hereafter "CITY') whose
principal offices are located at 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA.
II. RECITALS
Whereas, the COUNTY owns and operates a 24" concrete wastewater pipeline
(hereafter "Pipeline") that crosses Highway 3 at "D" Street; and
Whereas, there is an existing Interlocal agreement between the CITY and the COUNTY
relating to the shared use of the Pipeline; and
Whereas, the CITY discharges wastewater to the Pipeline which requires the COUNTY
to provide and maintain additional flow capacity within the pipeline; and
Whereas, the Pipeline is in disrepair and requires the installation of a cure -in-place liner;
and
Whereas, the CITY has a project planned to contract for the installation of a cure -in-
place liner in the Pipeline; and
Whereas, Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington provides that local
jurisdictions may enter into cooperative agreements for their mutual benefit,
NOW THEREFORE, the COUNTY and the CITY, through their respective legislative
bodies, do hereby agree as follows:
III. AGREEMENT
A. The Recitals set forth above are expressly incorporated into the Agreement by
this reference.
B. This AGREEMENT consists of the following documents:
1. Interlocal Agreement
2. Exhibit A: Basis of Cost Sharing
C. Purpose: The purpose of the AGREEMENT is to provide a mechanism through
which the COUNTY and the CITY share in the installation costs that are incurred by the
CITY to install a liner in the Pipeline.
D. Scope of Work: The CITY shall administer the project and provide all design,
construction management, and contract administration services to provide for the cure -
in -place lining of the Pipeline.
E. Reimbursement: COUNTY shall reimburse CITY for $16,400 as its fair share
contribution of costs upon presentation of a properly executed invoice. The
determination of fair share cost is outlined in Exhibit A. COUNTY shall reimburse CITY
within thirty (30) days of receipt of a properly executed CITY invoice.
F. Ownership: Upon completion of the installation of the liner, and acceptance by
the COUNTY, the liner will become the property of the COUNTY. The COUNTY will
continue to own, operate, and maintain the Pipeline.
G. Indemnity: Both COUNTY and CITY shall accept responsibility for any and all
liability arising from acts of its own officers, employees, agents and contractors to the
extent provided by law. Additionally, each party agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold
harmless the other party, and its officers, agents, and employees for all claims
(including demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages or costs of any kind whatsoever)
including costs, expenses and reasonable attorney's fees, to the extent such a claim
arises or is caused by the indemnifying party's own negligence or that of its officers,
agents, or employees in performance of this Agreement.
Nothing contained in this section of this Agreement shall be construed to create a
liability or a right of indemnification in any third party.
This section shall survive the expiration of this Agreement.
H. Amendments: The parties hereby further agree that this AGREEMENT cannot
be amended or modified without the written concurrence of both parties.
I. Termination: Either party to this AGREEMENT may elect to terminate this
AGREEMENT for any reason by delivering a sixty (60) day written notice of intent to
terminate to the other party.
J. Duration: This AGREEMENT shall commence on the date of execution, and
shall remain in effect through December 31, 2017.
K. Interlocal Agreement: This is an interlocal agreement entered into pursuant to
the authorization of Chapter 39.34 RCW. Accordingly, the following provisions are set
forth in accordance with the provisions of RCW 39.34.030.
1. No separate legal or administrative entity is created by this Agreement.
2. Each party shall separately maintain a budget for its own activities under this
Agreement.
3. No administrator or joint board shall be responsible for administering the
undertakings of this Agreement.
4. No joint property shall be acquired, held or disposed of. Any real or personal
property used in the joint or cooperative undertaking shall be considered to be
and remain the property of the party who purchased such real or personal
property unless otherwise specified in this Agreement.
5. This Agreement shall be effective when posted on the website of the County or
the City in accordance with RCW 39.34. Alternatively, pursuant to RCW
39.34.040, as interlocal agreements may be recorded with the county Auditor in
the county where the public agencies entering into the agreement are located,
this Agreement may be recorded with the Kitsap County Auditor as soon as
reasonably possible after its execution by the County and the City.
L. Waiver: A failure by either party to exercise its rights under this agreement shall
not preclude that party from subsequent exercise of such rights and shall not constitute
a waiver of any other rights under this Agreement unless stated to be such in a writing
signed by an authorized representative of the party and attached to the original
Agreement.
M. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.
N. Venue. The venue for any action to enforce or interpret this Agreement shall lie
in the Superior Court of Washington for Kitsap County, Washington.
O. Multiple Originals. This Agreement may be executed in multiple copies, each of
which shall be deemed an original.
P. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or any provision of any
document incorporated by reference shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect
the other provisions of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid
provision, if such remainder conforms to the requirements of applicable law and the
fundamental purpose of this agreement, and to this end the provisions of this
Agreement are declared to be severable.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the parties on the dates
hereinafter indicated.
DATED /';L y of 61 , 2017
CITY OF BREMERTON
ATTEST:
6CO-4�
CITY Clerk
Approved as to From:
CITY Attorney
DATED this' day of cA Qb , 2017
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON
CHARLOTTE GARRIDO, Chair
ROBERT dELDEA, Commissioner
i
EDWARD E. WOL E, Commissioner
ATTEST:
f
Dana Daniels, Clerk of the Board
:rri
40010
SgP�Cwrz�
y
Estimate of Kitsap County Share of Lining 24" Concrete Pipe under SR3
The CITY plans to contract for pipe lining services in a number of locations including the
Pipeline crossing SR3 at "D" Street in Bremerton. The Pipeline is owned by the COUNTY but
both jurisdictions convey wastewater through this Pipeline. The Pipeline is constructed with
24 inch diameter concrete pipe which has deteriorated and is 255 feet long. The estimated
cost of installing a cure -in-place liner in the Pipeline is $58,000.
There was a similar shared project in 2011 which established the COUNTY share as that
required to slip line an 8" pipe through the existing pipe. The 2011 estimated cost per foot
to slip line an 8" pipe was $49.46/foot, excluding sales tax. Using an inflation rate of 3% the
2017 cost per foot would be $59.07/foot. The length of this section of pipe is 255 feet.
Based on these costs the COUNTY fair share cost for this work is $16,400.
Amounts are rounded to the nearest $100.
Estimated fair share of costs.
Pipe Length
$/ft
Cost
255
$59.07
$15,100
Sales Tax
8.70%
$1,300
Total
$16,400
_0
X
z
nz
m
(�`
�0n
W
°v
00
S
:CJ
CD
D
�
�
cn
X
�.
�
co
z
0
CA
CIO��
?
—`�
—
or
co
_ .
Gr
v
ll�
m
co
HCl
L
cn
Cmn
O0—loo
m -DI r�-0
zmm
m
0
O�
-vK
M
z
m
0
w
0
0
-a
3
co -<< m O
O z
X m
0 0
m
0
n
W�
®0
�-n
W
crn
qrn
am
z
z
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
6J
SUBJECT: Professional Services Study Session Date: March 8, 2017
Agreement with HDR, Inc. for Design of COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017
Innovative Safety Improvements for West Department: PW&U
Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Presenter: Knuckey
Road Innovative Safety Projects Phone: (360) 473-2376
SUMMARY: The City has been offered a Highway Safety Improvement Grant under the 2016
Innovative Safety Program to design and construct high friction pavement and guardrails on both
West Belfair Valley and Tracyton Beach Roads. The City advertised a Request for Qualifications,
and received proposals from two firms to perform the design. The City selected HDR, Inc., to do the
work; their design cost is $146,699.30 and is eligible for 100% grant funding upon receipt of design
obligation from WSDOT. Staff will withhold notice to proceed to HDR, Inc., until design obligation
has been received.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Professional Services Agreement with HDR, Inc. 2. Site Plan
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The 10% match for design (Preliminary
Engineering) will be waived upon receipt of design obligation from WSDOT.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: x❑ No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: 0 Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with HDR, Inc. for design of the West Belfair
Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Projects; and authorize the Mayor to
finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve
Form Updated 01/07/15
❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Local Agency A&E Professional Services
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement
Agreement Number:
Firm/Organization Legal Name (do not use dba's):
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Address
Federal Aid Number
500 108th Ave NE, Suite 1200, Bellevue, WA 98004
NA
UBI Number
Federal TIN or SSN Number
601 021 437
47-0680568
Execution Date
Completion Date
1099 Form Required
Federal Participation
❑ Yes ❑ N
i❑ Yes ❑ No
Project Title
West Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Project
Description of Work
Preparing engineering, contract documents and plans for the design of high friction pavement, guardrail,
permanent signage, storm water conveyance and delineation of Tracyton Beach and Belfair Valley Road.
❑i Yes 33.8% ❑ No DBE Participation
Total Amount Authorized: $133,363.30
❑ Yes ❑i No MBE Participation
Management Reserve Fund: $13,336.00
❑ Yes ❑i No WBE Participation
❑ Yes ❑i No SBE Participation
Maximum Amount Payable: $146,699.30
Index of Exhibits
Exhibit A
Scope of Work
Exhibit B
DBE Participation
Exhibit C
Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and Other Data
Exhibit D
Prime Consultant Cost Computations
Exhibit E
Sub -consultant Cost Computations
Exhibit F
Title VI Assurances
Exhibit G
Certification Documents
Exhibit H
Liability Insurance Increase
Exhibit I
Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
Exhibit J
Consultant Claim Procedures
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 1 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as shown in the "Execution Date" box on page one (1) of this
AGREEMENT, between the City of Bremerton ,
hereinafter called the "AGENCY," and the "Film / Organization Name" referenced on page one (1) of this
AGREEMENT, hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT."
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the work referenced in -Description of Work" on page one (1)
of this AGREEMENT and hereafter called the "SERVICES;" and does not have sufficient staff to meet the required
commitment and therefore deems it advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide
the necessary SERVICES; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that they comply with the Washington State Statutes relating
to professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish consulting services to
the AGENCY.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performance contained herein,
or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I. General Description of Work
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of the above-described SERVICES as herein defined, and
necessary to accomplish the completed work for this project. The CONSULTANT shall furnish all services, labor,
and related equipment and, if applicable, sub -consultants and subcontractors necessary to conduct and complete the
SERVICES as designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT.
II. General Scope of Work
The Scope of Work and projected level of effort required for these SERVICES is described in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. The General Scope of Work was developed
utilizing performance based contracting methodologies.
III. General Requirements
All aspects of coordination of the work of this AGREEMENT with outside agencies, groups, or individuals shall
receive advance approval by the AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with agencies, groups, and/or
individuals shall be coordinated through the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination, progress,
and presentation meetings with the AGENCY and/or such State, Federal, Community, City, or County officials,
groups or individuals as may be requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will provide the CONSULTANT
sufficient notice prior to meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation. The minimum required hours or days'
noticc shall be agreed to between the AGENCY and the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "A."
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY, which will
outline in written and graphical form the various phases and the order of performance of the SERVICES in
sufficient detail so that the progress of the SERVICES can easily be evaluated.
The CONSULTANT, any sub -consultants, and the AGENCY shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws,
rules, codes, regulations, and all AGENCY policies and directives, applicable to the work to be performed under
this AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of Washington.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 2 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
Participation for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) or Small Business Enterprises (SBE), if required,
per 49 CFR Part 26, shall be shown on the heading of this AGREEMENT. If DBE firms are utilized at the
commencement of this AGREEMENT, the amounts authorized to each firm and their certification number will
be shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. If the Prime
CONSULTANT is a DBE certified firm they must comply with the Commercial Useful Function (CUF) regulation
outlined in the AGENCY's "DBE Program Participation Plan" and perform a minimum of 30% of the total amount
of this AGREEMENT. It is recommended, but not required, that non -DBE Prime CONSULTANTS perform
a minimum of 30% of the total amount of this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, is required to submit DBE Participation of the amounts paid to all DBE
firms invoiced for this AGREEMENT.
All Reports, PS&E materials, and other data furnished to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be returned.
All electronic files, prepared by the CONSULTANT, must meet the requirements as outlined in Exhibit "C —
Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and other Data."
All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products, including all electronic files, prepared
by the CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for
these SERVICES, and are the property of the AGENCY. Reuse by the AGENCY or by others, acting through or
on behalf of the AGENCY of any such instruments of service, not occurring as a part of this SERVICE, shall be
without liability or legal exposure to the CONSULTANT.
Any and all notices or requests required under this AGREEMENT shall be made in writing and sent to the other
party by (i) certified mail, return receipt requested, or (ii) by email or facsimile, to the address set forth below:
If to AGENCY.
Name: Shane Weber
Agency: City of Bremerton Public Works & Utilitie
Address: 100 Oyster Bay Ave. N
City: Bremerton State: WA Zip: 98312
Email: Shane.Weber@ci.bremerton.wa.us
Phone: (360) 473-2354
Facsimile: (360) 473-5398
IV. Time for Beginning and Completion
If to CONSULTANT:
Name: Mason Skinner
Agency: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Address:
City: State: Zip:
Email:
Phone:
Facsimile:
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in writing
by the AGENCY. All work under this AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this
AGREEMENT titled "Completion Date."
The established completion time shall not be extended because of any delays attributable to the CONSULTANT,
but may be extended by the AGENCY in the event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or because of
unavoidable delays caused by an act of GOD, governmental actions, or other conditions beyond the control of the
CONSULTANT. A prior supplemental AGREEMENT issued by the AGENCY is required to extend the established
completion time.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 3 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
V. Payment Provisions
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed SERVICES rendered under this AGREEMENT
as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for SERVICES performed or SERVICES
rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete SERVICES,
specified in Section II, "Scope of Work". The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of 48 CFR
Part 31 (www.ecfr.gov). The estimate in support of the Cost Plus Fixed Fee amount is attached hereto as Exhibits
"D" and "E" and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT.
A. Actual Costs: Payment for all consulting services for this PROJECT shall be on the basis of the
CONSULTANT'S actual cost plus a fixed fee. The actual cost shall include direct salary cost, indirect cost rate,
and direct non -salary costs.
Direct (RAW) Labor Costs: The Direct (RAW) Labor Cost is the direct salary paid to principals,
professional, technical, and clerical personnel for the time they are productively engaged in work necessary
to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall maintain support data to verify the
direct salary costs billed to the AGENCY.
2. Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) Costs: ICR Costs are those costs, other than direct costs, which are included as
such on the books of the CONSULTANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books. Progress payments
shall be made at the ICR rates shown in attached Exhibits "D" and "E" of this AGREEMENT. Total
ICR payment shall be based on Actual Costs. The AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT
the actual ICR costs verified by audit, up to the Maximum Total Amount Payable, authorized under this
AGREEMENT, when accumulated with all other Actual Costs.
A summary of the CONSULTANT'S cost estimate and the ICR percentage is shown in Exhibits "D" and
"E", attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT (prime
and all sub -consultants) will submit to the AGENCY within six (6) months after the end of each firm's fiscal
year, an ICR schedule in the format required by the AGENCY (cost category, dollar expenditures, etc.) for
the purpose of adjusting the ICR rate for billings received and paid during the fiscal year represented by the
ICR schedule. It shall also be used for the computation of progress payments during the following year and
for retroactively adjusting the previous year's ICR cost to reflect the actual rate. The ICR schedule will be
sent to Email: Con sultantRates@wsdot.wa.gov.
Failure to supply this information by either the prime CONSULTANT or any of their sub -consultants shall
cause the AGENCY to withhold payment of the billed ICR costs until such time as the required information
is received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is approved.
The AGENCY's Project Manager and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the
CONSULTANT'S books and records at any time during regular business hours to determine the actual ICR
rate, if they so desire.
Direct Non -Salary Costs: Direct Non -Salary Costs will be reimbursed at the Actual Cost to the
CONSULTANT. These charges may include, but are not limited to, the following items: travel, printing,
long distance telephone, supplies, computer charges and fees of sub -consultants. Air or train travel will be
reimbursed only to economy class levels unless otherwise approved by the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT
shall comply with the rules and regulations regarding travel costs (excluding air, train, and rental car costs)
in accordance with WSDOT's Accounting Manual M 13-82, Chapter 10 — Travel Rules and Procedures, and
revisions thereto. Air, train, and rental car costs shall be reimbursed in accordance with 48 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 31.205-46 "Travel Costs." The billing for Direct Non -Salary Costs shall include an
itemized listing of the charges directly identifiable with the PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall maintain
the original supporting documents in their office. Copies of the original supporting documents shall be
supplied to the AGENCY upon request. All above charges must be necessary for the services provided
under this AGREEMENT.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 4 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
4. Fixed Fee: The Fixed Fee, which represents the CONSULTANT'S profit, is shown in attached Exhibits "D"
and "E" of this AGREEMENT. This fee is based on the Scope of Work defined in this AGREEMENT and
the estimated person -hours required to perform the stated Scope of Work. In the event the CONSULTANT
enters into a supplemental AGREEMENT for additional work, the supplemental AGREEMENT may
include provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The Fixed Fee will be prorated
and paid monthly in proportion to the perccntagc of work complctcd by the CONSULTANT and rcportcd
in the Monthly Progress Reports accompanying the billings. Any portion of the Fixed Fee earned but not
previously paid in the progress payments will be covered in the final payment, subject to the provisions of
Section IX entitled "Termination of Agreement."
5. Management Reserve Fund (MRF): The AGENCY may desire to establish MRF to provide the Agreement
Administrator with the flexibility to authorize additional funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable
unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in
this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s) shall be in writing and shall not exceed the lesser of 5100,000 or
10% of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount included
for the MRF is shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. This fund may not be replenished. Any
changes requiring additional costs in excess of the MRF shall be made in accordance with Section XIII,
"Extra Work."
6. Maximum Total Amount Payable: The Maximum Total Amount Payable by the AGENCY to the
CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this
AGREEMENT. The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized, and
the MRF. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not include payment for Extra Work as stipulated in
Section XIII, "Extra Work." No minimum amount payable is guaranteed under this AGREEMENT.
B. Monthly Progress Payments: The CONSULTANT may submit billings to the AGENCY for reimbursement of
Actual Costs plus the ICR and calculated fee on a monthly basis during the progress of the work. Such billings
shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports required under
Section III, "General Requirements" of this AGREEMENT. The billings will be supported by an itemized
listing for each item including Direct (RAW) Labor, Direct Non -Salary, and allowable ICR Costs to which will
be added the prorated Fixed Fee. To provide a means of verifying the billed Direct (RAW) Labor costs for
CONSULTANT employees, the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist of
recording the names, titles, Direct (RAW) Labor rates, and present duties of those employees performing work
on the PROJECT at the time of the interview.
C. Final Payment: Final Payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned will be made
promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under this AGREEMENT,
contingent, if applicable, upon receipt of all PS&E, plans, maps, notes, reports, electronic data and other related
documents which are required to be furnished under this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such Final Payment by
the CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for payment, which the CONSULTANT may have
against the AGENCY unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by
the CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said Final Payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that
the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY may pursue with respect
to such claims.
The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and at the time
of final audit; all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. In the event that such
final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to
the AGENCY within thirty (30) calendar days of notice of the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute
a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any claims relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of
overpayment. The CONSULTANT has twenty (20) working days after receipt of the final POST AUDIT to
begin the appeal process to the AGENCY for audit findings.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 5 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
D. Inspection of Cost Records: The CONSULTANT and their sub -consultants shall keep available for inspection
by representatives of the AGENCY and the United States, for a period of six (6) years after receipt of final
payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon
these records with the following exception: if any litigation, claim or audit arising out of, in connection with,
or related to this AGREEMENT is initiated before the expiration of the six (6) year period, the cost records and
accounts shall be retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
An interim or post audit may be performed on this AGREEMENT. The audit, if any, will be performed by the
State Auditor, WSDOT's Internal Audit Office and/or at the request of the AGENCY's Project Manager.
VI. Sub -Contracting
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for those items of SERVICES as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by
this reference made part of this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract for the performance of any SERVICE under this AGREEMENT without
prior written permission of the AGENCY. No permission for subcontracting shall create, between the AGENCY
and sub -consultant, any contract or any other relationship.
Compensation for this sub -consultant SERVICES shall be based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit "E" attached
hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT.
The SERVICES of the sub -consultant shall not exceed its maximum amount payable identified in each sub -
consultant cost estimate unless a prior written approval has been issued by the AGENCY
All reimbursable direct labor, indirect cost rate, direct non -salary costs and fixed fee costs for the sub -consultant
shall be negotiated and substantiated in accordance with section V "Payment Provisions" herein and shall be
memorialized in a final written acknowledgement between the parties.
All subcontracts shall contain all applicable provisions of this AGREEMENT, and the CONSULTANT shall require
each sub -consultant or subcontractor, of any tier, to abide by the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT. With
respect to sub -consultant payment, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the STATE'S
Prompt Payment laws as set forth in RCW 39.04.250 and RCW 39.76.011.
The CONSULTANT, sub -recipient, or sub -consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin, or sex in the performance of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall carry out applicable
requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT -assisted contracts. Failure by the
CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT, which may result in the
termination of this AGREEMENT or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate.
VII. Employment and Organizational Conflict of Interest
The CONSULTANT warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona
fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or
agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the
award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul
this AGREEMENT without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from this AGREEMENT price or consideration
or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work
or services required of the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered employees of the
CONSULTANT only and not of the AGENCY, and any and all claims that may arise under any Workmen's
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 6 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
Compensation Act on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims made
by a third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the CONSULTANT's employees or other
persons while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation
and responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full- or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of this
AGREEMENT, any professional or technical personnel who are, or have been, at any time during the period of this
AGREEMENT, in the employ of the United States Department of Transportation or the AGENCY, except regularly
retired employees, without written consent of the public employer of such person if he/she will be working on this
AGREEMENT for the CONSULTANT.
VIII. Nondiscrimination
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, sub -consultants,
subcontractors and successors in interest, agrees to comply with the following laws and regulations:
• Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 U.S.C. Chapter 21 Subchapter V § 2000d
through 2000d -4a)
• Federal -aid Highway Act of 1973
(23 U.S.C. Chapter 3 § 324)
• Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987
(Public Law 100-259)
• American with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 U.S.C. Chapter 126 § 12101 et. seq.)
• 23 CFR Part 200
• Rehabilitation Act of 1973 • 49 CFR Part 21
(29 U.S.C. Chapter 16 Subchapter V § 794) • 49 CFR Part 26
• Age Discrimination Act of 1975 • RCW 49.60.180
(42 U.S.C. Chapter 76 § 6101 et. seq.)
In relation to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the CONSULTANT is bound by the provisions of Exhibit "F"
attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT, and shall include the attached Exhibit "F" in
every sub -contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations
or directives issued pursuant thereto.
IX. Termination of Agreement
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate this AGREEMENT at any time with or without cause upon ten
(10) days written notice to the CONSULTANT.
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the AGENCY, other than for default on the part of the
CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged and any appropriate
fixed fee percentage at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT, plus any direct non -salary costs incurred up to
the time of termination of this AGREEMENT.
No payment shall be made for any SERVICES completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the
CONSULTANT of the notice to terminate. if the accumulated payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice
of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due when computed as set forth in paragraph two (2) of this
section, then no final payment shall be due and the CONSULTANT shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for
any excess paid.
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CONSULTANT,
the above formula for payment shall not apply.
In the event of a termination for default, the amount to be paid to the CONSULTANT shall be determined by the
AGENCY with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the CONSULTANT in performing SERVICES
to the date of termination, the amount of SERVICES originally required which was satisfactorily completed to
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 7 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
date of termination, whether that SERVICE is in a form or a type which is usable to the AGENCY at the time of
termination, the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firin to complete the SERVICES required and the
time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the AGENCY of the SERVICES
performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the
amount, which would have been made using the formula set forth in paragraph two (2) of this section.
If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT's failure to
perform is without the CONSULTANT's or its employee's fault or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to
be a termination for the convenience of the AGENCY. In such an event, the CONSULTANT would be reimbursed
for actual costs and appropriate fixed fee percentage in accordance with the termination for other than default
clauses listed previously.
The CONSULTANT shall, within 15 days, notify the AGENCY in writing, in the event of the death of any member,
partner, or officer of the CONSULTANT or the death or change of any of the CONSULTANT's supervisory and/or
other key personnel assigned to the project or disaffiliation of any principally involved CONSULTANT employee.
The CONSULTANT shall also notify the AGENCY, in writing, in the event of the sale or transfer of 50% or
more of the beneficial ownership of the CONSULTANT within 15 days of such sale or transfer occurring. The
CONSULTANT shall continue to be obligated to complete the SERVICES under the terms of this AGREEMENT
unless the AGENCY chooses to terminate this AGREEMENT for convenience or chooses to renegotiate any term(s)
of this AGREEMENT. If termination for convenience occurs, final payment will be made to the CONSULTANT
as set forth in the second and third paragraphs of this section.
Payment for any part of the SERVICES by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of
any remedies of any type it may have against the CONSULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by the
CONSULTANT, or for failure of the CONSULTANT to perform SERVICES required of it by the AGENCY
Forbearance of any rights under the AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights
with respect to any future act or omission by the CONSULTANT.
X. Changes of Work
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and revisions in the completed work of this AGREEMENT as
necessary to correct errors appearing therein, without additional compensation thereof. Should the AGENCY find
it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed SERVICES or parts thereof changed or
revised, the CONSULTANT shall make such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This work shall be considered
as Extra Work and will be paid for as herein provided under section XIII "Extra Work."
A. Disputes
Any disputed issue not resolved pursuant to the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be submitted in writing within
10 days to the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer, whose decision in the matter shall be final and
binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT; provided however, that if an action is brought challenging the
Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall be subject to judicial review. If the
parties to this AGREEMENT mutually agree, disputes concerning alleged design errors will be conducted under
the procedures found in Exhibit "J". In the event that either party deem it necessary to institute legal action or
proceeding to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, this action shall be initiated in the Superior
Court of the State of Washington, situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located. The parties hereto
agree that all questions shall be resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties have the right of
appeal from such decisions of the Superior Court in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The
CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Superior Court of the State of Washington,
situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 8 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
Al. Legal Relations
The CONSULTANT, any sub -consultants, and the AGENCY shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws,
rules, codes, regulations and all AGENCY policies and directives, applicable to the work to be performed under this
AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and hold The State of Washington (STATE) and the AGENCY and
their officers and employees harmless from all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part
from the negligence of, or the breach of any obligation under this AGREEMENT by, the CONSULTANT or the
CONSULTANT's agents, employees, sub consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons
for whom the CONSULTANT may be legally liable; provided that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT
to defend or indemnify the STATE and the AGENCY and their officers and employees against and hold harmless
the STATE and the AGENCY and their officers and employees from claims, demands or suits based solely upon
the negligence of, or breach of any obligation under this AGREEMENT by the STATE and the AGENCY, their
agents, officers, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom
the STATE and/or the AGENCY may be legally liable; and provided further that if the claims or suits arc caused
by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the CONSULTANT or the CONSULTANT's agents, employees,
sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the CONSULTANT is legally
liable, and (b) the STATE and/or AGENCY, their agents, officers, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors and or
vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the STATE and or AGENCY may be legally liable, the defense
and indemnity obligation shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the CONSULTANT's negligence or
the negligence of the CONSULTANT's agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier,
or any other persons for whom the CONSULTANT may be legally liable. This provision shall be included in any
AGREEMENT between CONSULTANT and any sub -consultant, subcontractor and vendor, of any tier.
The CONSULTANT shall also defend, indemnify, and hold the STATE and the AGENCY and their officers
and employees harmless from all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the
alleged patent or copyright infringement or other allegedly improper appropriation or use of trade secrets, patents,
proprietary information, know-how, copyright rights or inventions by the CONSULTANT or the CONSULTANT's
agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other- persons for whom the
CONSULTANT may be legally liable, in performance of the Work under this AGREEMENT or arising out of any
use in connection with the AGREEMENT of methods, processes, designs, information or other items furnished or
communicated to STATE and/or the AGENCY, their agents, officers and employees pursuant to the AGREEMENT;
provided that this indemnity shall not apply to any alleged patent or copyright infringement or other allegedly
improper appropriation or use of trade secrets, patents, proprietary information, know-how, copyright rights or
inventions resulting from STATE and/or AGENCY'S, their agents', officers' and employees' failure to comply
with specific written instructions regarding use provided to STATE and/or AGENCY, their agents, officers and
employees by the CONSULTANT, its agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or
any other persons for whom the CONSULTANT may be legally liable.
The CONSULTANT's relation to the AGENCY shall be at all times as an independent contractor.
Notwithstanding any determination by the Executive Ethics Board or other tribunal, the AGENCY may, in its sole
discretion, by written notice to the CONSULTANT terminate this AGREEMENT if it is found after due notice and
examination by the AGENCY that there is a violation of the Ethics in Public Service Act, Chapter 42.52 RCW; or
any similar statute involving the CONSULTANT in the procurement of, or performance under, this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT's own
employees or its agents against the STATE and /or the AGENCY and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification
and defense, the CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51
RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated between the Parties.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 9 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
Unless otherwise specified in this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of
construction contracts, if any, on the project. Subject to the processing of a new sole source, or an acceptable
supplemental AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT shall provide On -Call assistance to the AGENCY during contract
administration. By providing such assistance, the CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for: proper
construction techniques, job site safety, or any construction contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance
with the contract documents.
The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of this AGREEMENT, or as otherwise
required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance
Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the STATE.
B. Commercial general liability insurance written under ISO Form CG 00 01 12 04 or its equivalent with minimum
limits of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) in the
aggregate for each policy period.
C. Business auto liability insurance written under ISO Form CG 00 01 10 01 or equivalent providing coverage for
any "Auto" (Symbol 1) used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000.00) combined single
limit for each occurrence.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and any Professional Liability Insurance, the STATE and
AGENCY, their officers, employees, and agents will be named on all policies of CONSULTANT and any sub -
consultant and/or subcontractor as an additional insured (the "AIs"), with no restrictions or limitations concerning
products and completed operations coverage. This coverage shall be primary coverage and non-contributory and
any coverage maintained by the AIs shall be excess over, and shall not contribute with, the additional insured
coverage required hereunder. The CONSULTANT's and the sub -consultant's and/or subcontractor's insurer shall
waive any and all rights of subrogation against the AIs. The CONSULTANT shall furnish the AGENCY with
verification of insurance and endorsements required by this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY reserves the right to
require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen (14) days of the
execution of this AGREEMENT to:
Name:
Agency:
Address:
City: State: Zip:
Email:
Phone:
Facsimile:
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the AGENCY
The CONSULTANT's professional liability to the AGENCY, including that which may arise in reference to
section IX "Termination of Agreement" of this AGREEMENT, shall be limited to the accumulative amount of the
authorized AGREEMENT amount or one million dollars ($1,000,000.00), whichever is greater, unless the limit of
liability is increased by the AGENCY pursuant to Exhibit H. In no case shall the CONSULTANT's professional
liability to third parties be limited in any way.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 10 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
The parties enter into this AGREEMENT for the sole benefit of the parties, and to the exclusion of any third party,
and no third party beneficiary is intended or created by the execution of this AGREEMENT.
The AGENCY will pay no progress payments under section V "Payment Provisions" until the CONSULTANT has
fully complied with this section. This remedy is not exclusive; and the AGENCY may take such other action as is
available to it under other provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise in law.
XIII. Extra Work
A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written order, make changes within the general scope of this AGREEMENT
in the SERVICES to be performed.
B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of, or the time required for, performance
of any part of the SERVICES under this AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the order, or otherwise
affects any other terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall make an equitable adjustment
in the: (1) maximum amount payable; (2) delivery or completion schedule, or both; and (3) other affected terms
and shall modify this AGREEMENT accordingly.
C. The CONSULTANT must submit any "request for equitable adjustment," hereafter referred to as "CLAIM,"
under this clause within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the written order. However, if the AGENCY
decides that the facts justify it, the AGENCY may receive and act upon a CLAIM submitted before final
payment of this AGREEMENT.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the section XI "Disputes" clause. However, nothing
in this clause shall excuse the CONSULTANT from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changed.
E. Notwithstanding the terms and conditions of paragraphs (A.) and (B.) above, the maximum amount payable for
this AGREEMENT, shall not be increased or considered to be increased except by specific written supplement
to this AGREEMENT.
XIV. Endorsement of Plans
If applicable, the CONSULTANT shall place their endorsement on all plans, estimates, or any other engineering
data furnished by them.
XV. Federal Review
The Federal Highway Administration shall have the right to participate in the review or examination of the
SERVICES in progress.
XVI. Certification of the Consultant and the Agency
Attached hereto as Exhibit "G -1(a and b)" are the Certifications of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, Exhibit
"G-2" Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered
Transactions, Exhibit "G-3" Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
and Exhibit "G-4" Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibit "G-3" is required only in AGREEMENT's
over one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) and Exhibit "G-4" is required only in AGREEMENT's over
five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00.) These Exhibits must be executed by the CONSULTANT, and
submitted with the master AGREEMENT, and returned to the AGENCY at the address listed in section III "General
Requirements" prior to its performance of any SERVICES under this AGREEMENT.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 11 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
XVII. Complete Agreement
This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the
parties. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or
be liable for, any statement, representation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or
modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as a supplement
to this AGREEMENT.
XVIII. Execution and Acceptance
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
to be an original having identical legal effect. The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements,
representations, warranties, covenants, and AGREEMENT's contained in the proposal, and the supporting material
submitted by the CONSULTANT, and does hereby accept this AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terms and
conditions thereof.
XIX. Protection of Confidential Information
The CONSULTANT acknowledges that some of the material and information that may come into its possession
or knowledge in connection with this AGREEMENT or its performance may consist of information that is exempt
from disclosure to the public or other unauthorized persons under either chapter 42.56 RCW or other local, state
or federal statutes ("State's Confidential Information"). The "State's Confidential Information" includes, but is
not limited to, names, addresses, Social Security numbers, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, financial profiles,
credit card information, driver's license numbers, medical data, law enforcement records (or any other information
identifiable to an individual), STATE and AGENCY source code or object code, STATE and AGENCY security
data, non-public Specifications, STATE and AGENCY non -publicly available data, proprietary software, State
security data, or information which may jeopardize any part of the project that relates to any of these types of
information. The CONSULTANT agrees to hold the State's Confidential Information in strictest confidence
and not to make use of the State's Confidential Information for any purpose other than the performance of this
AGREEMENT, to release it only to authorized employees, sub -consultants or subcontractors requiring such
information for the purposes of carrying out this AGREEMENT, and not to release, divulge, publish, transfer,
sell, disclose, or otherwise make it known to any other party without the AGENCY's express written consent
or as provided by law. The CONSULTANT agrees to release such information or material only to employees,
sub -consultants or subcontractors who have signed a nondisclosure AGREEMENT, the terms of which have
been previously approved by the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT agrees to implement physical, electronic, and
managerial safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the State's Confidential Information.
Immediately upon expiration or termination of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT shall, at the AGENCY's
option: (i) certify to the AGENCY that the CONSULTANT has destroyed all of the State's Confidential
Information; or (ii) returned all of the State's Confidential Information to the AGENCY; or (iii) take whatever other
steps the AGENCY requires of the CONSULTANT to protect the State's Confidential Information.
As required under Executive Order 00-03, the CONSULTANT shall maintain a log documenting the following:
the State's Confidential Information received in the performance of this AGREEMENT; the purpose(s) for which
the State's Confidential Information was received; who received, maintained and used the State's Confidential
Information; and the final disposition of the State's Confidential Information. The CONSULTANT's records shall
be subject to inspection, review, or audit upon reasonable notice from the AGENCY.
The AGENCY reserves the right to monitor, audit, or investigate the use of the State's Confidential Information
collected, used, or acquired by the CONSULTANT through this AGREEMENT. The monitoring, auditing, or
investigating may include, but is not limited to, salting databases.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 12 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
Violation of this section by the CONSULTANT or its sub -consultants or subcontractors may result in termination of
this AGREEMENT and demand for return of all State's Confidential Information, monetary damages, or penalties.
It is understood and acknowledged that the CONSULTANT may provide the AGENCY with information which
is proprietary and/or confidential during the term of this AGREEMENT. The parties agree to maintain the
confidentiality of such information during the term of this AGREEMENT and afterwards. All materials containing
such proprietary and/or confidential information shall be clearly identified and marked as "Confidential" and shall
be returned to the disclosing party at the conclusion of the SERVICES under this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall provide the AGENCY with a list of all information and materials it considers confidential
and/or proprietary in nature: (a) at the commencement of the term of this AGREEMENT; or (b) as soon as such
confidential or proprietary material is developed. "Proprietary and/or confidential information" is not meant to
include any information which, at the time of its disclosure: (i) is already known to the other parry; (ii) is rightfully
disclosed to one of the parties by a third party that is not acting as an agent or representative for the other party;
(iii) is independently developed by or for the other party; (iv) is publicly known; or (v) is generally utilized by
unaffiliated third parties engaged in the same business or businesses as the CONSULTANT.
The parties also acknowledge that the AGENCY is subject to Washington State and federal public disclosure
laws. As such, the AGENCY shall maintain the confidentiality of all such information marked proprietary and/
or confidential or otherwise exempt, unless such disclosure is required under applicable state or federal law. If a
public disclosure request is made to view materials identified as "Proprietary and/or confidential information" or
otherwise exempt information, the AGENCY will notify the CONSULTANT of the request and of the date that such
records will be released to the requester unless the CONSULTANT obtains a court order from a court of competent
jurisdiction enjoining that disclosure. If the CONSULTANT fails to obtain the court order enjoining disclosure, the
AGENCY will release the requested information on the date specified.
The CONSULTANT agrees to notify the sub -consultant of any AGENCY communication regarding disclosure that
may include a sub -consultant's proprietary and/or confidential information. The CONSULTANT notification to the
sub -consultant will include the date that such records will be released by the AGENCY to the requester and state
that unless the sub -consultant obtains a court order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that disclosure
the AGENCY will release the requested information. If the CONSULTANT and/or sub -consultant fail to obtain
a court order or other judicial relief enjoining the AGENCY by the release date, the CONSULTANT shall waive
and release and shall hold harmless and indemnify the AGENCY from all claims of actual or alleged damages,
liabilities, or costs associated with the AGENCY's said disclosure of sub -consultants' information.
XX. Records Maintenance
During the progress of the Work and SERVICES provided hereunder and for a period of not less than six (6) years
from the date of final payment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall keep, retain and maintain all
"documents" pertaining to the SERVICES provided pursuant to this AGREEMENT. Copies of all "documents"
pertaining to the SERVICES provided hereunder shall be made available for review at the CONSULTANT's place
of business during normal working hours. If any litigation, claim or audit is commenced, the CONSULTANT shall
cooperate with AGENCY and assist in the production of all such documents. "Documents" shall be retained until
all litigation, claims or audit findings have been resolved even though such litigation, claim or audit continues past
the six (6) year retention period.
For purposes of this AGREEMENT, "documents" means every writing or record of every type and description,
including electronically stored information ("EST"), that is in the possession, control, or custody of the
CONSULTANT, including, without limitation, any and all correspondences, contracts, AGREEMENT `s,
appraisals, plans, designs, data, surveys, maps, spreadsheets, memoranda, stenographic or handwritten
notes, reports, records, telegrams, schedules, diaries, notebooks, logbooks, invoices, accounting records,
work sheets, charts, notes, drafts, scribblings, recordings, visual displays, photographs, minutes of meetings,
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 13 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
tabulations, computations, summaries, inventories, and writings regarding conferences, conversations or
telephone conversations, and any and all other taped, recorded, written, printed or typed matters of any kind or
description; every copy of the foregoing whether or not the original is in the possession, custody, or control of the
CONSULTANT, and every copy of any of the foregoing, whether or not such copy is a copy identical to an original,
or whether or not such copy contains any commentary or notation whatsoever that does not appear on the original.
For purposes of this AGREEMENT, "ESI" means any and all computer data or electronic recorded media of any
kind, including "Native Files", that are stored in any medium from which it can be retrieved and examined, either
directly or after translation into a reasonably useable form. ESI may include information and/or documentation
stored in various software programs such as: Email, Outlook, Word, Excel, Access, Publisher, PowerPoint, Adobe
Acrobat, SQL databases, or any other software or electronic communication programs or databases that the
CONSULTANT may use in the performance of its operations. ESI may be located on network servers, backup
tapes, smart phones, thumb drives, CDs, DVDs, floppy disks, work computers, cell phones, laptops or any other
electronic device that CONSULTANT uses in the performance of its Work or SERVICES hereunder, including any
personal devices used by the CONSULTANT or any sub -consultant at home.
"Native files" are a subset of ESI and refer to the electronic format of the application in which such ESI is normally
created, viewed, and /or modified.
The CONSULTANT shall include this section XX "Records Maintenance" in every subcontract it enters into in
relation to this AGREEMENT and bind the sub -consultant to its terms, unless expressly agreed to otherwise in
writing by the AGENCY prior to the execution of such subcontract.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year shown in the
"Execution Date" box on page one (1) of this AGREEMENT.
Signature
Signature
Date
Date
Any mod cation, change, or reformation of this AGREEMENT shall require approval as to form by the Office
of the Attorney General.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 14 of 14
Revised 3/11/2016
Exhibit A
Scope of Work
Project No.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit B
DBE Participation
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit B Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit C
Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and Other Data
In this Exhibit the agency, as applicable, is to provide a description of the format and standards the consultant is
to use in preparing electronic files for transmission to the agency. The format and standards to be provided may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
L Surveying, Roadway Design & Plans Preparation Section
A. Survey Data
B. Roadway Design Files
C. Computer Aided Drafting Files
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Page 1 of 4
Revised 10/30/2014
D. Specify the Agency's Right to Review Product with the Consultant
E. Specify the Electronic Deliverables to Be Provided to the Agency
F. Specify What Agency Furnished Services and Information Is to Be Provided
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Page 2 of 4
Revised 10/30/2014
II. Any Other Electronic Files to Be Provided
III. Methods to Electronically Exchange Data
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Page 3 of 4
Revised 10/30/2014
A. Agency Software Suite
B. Electronic Messaging System
C. File Transfers Format
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Page 4 of 4
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit D
Prime Consultant Cost Computations
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit D Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit E
Sub -consultant Cost Computations
There isn't any sub -consultant participation at this time. The CONSULTANT shall not sub -contract for
the performance of any work under this AGREEMENT without prior written permission of the AGENCY.
Refer- to section VI `'Sub -Contracting" of this AGREEMENT.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit E Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit F
Title VI Assurances
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, and successors
in interest agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations: The CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regulations relative to non-
discrimination in federally assisted programs of the AGENCY, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the "REGULATIONS"),
which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT.
2. Non-discrimination: The CONSULTANT, with regard to the work performed during this AGREEMENT,
shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention
of sub -consultants, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The CONSULTANT
shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the
REGULATIONS, including employment practices when this AGREEMENT covers a program set forth
in Appendix B of the REGULATIONS.
Solicitations for Sub -consultants, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed
under a sub -contract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential sub -
consultant or supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT's obligations under
this AGREEMENT and the REGULATIONS relative to non-discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
sex, or national origin.
4. Information and Reports: The CONSULTANT shall provide all information and reports required by the
REGULATIONS or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the AGENCY, the
STATE, or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
REGULATIONS, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a CONSULTANT is in the
exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the CONSULTANT shall
so certify to the AGENCY, the STATE, or the FHWA as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has
made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Non-compliance: In the event of the CONSULTANT's non-compliance with the non-
discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose such AGREEMENT sanctions
as it, the STATE, or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
• Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT until the CONSULTANT
complies, and/or;
• Cancellation, termination, or suspension of this AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.
6. Incorporation of Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through
(5) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the
REGULATIONS, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The CONSULTANT shall take such action with
respect to any sub -consultant or procurement as the STATE, the AGENCY, or FHWA may direct as a means
of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-compliance.
Provided, however, that in the event a CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is threatened with,
litigation with a sub -consultant or supplier as a result of such direction, the CONSULTANT may request
the AGENCY enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the STATE and/or the AGENCY and, in
addition, the CONSULTANT may request the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests
of the United States. Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit F Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit G -1(a)
Exhibit G -1(b)
Exhibit G-2
Exhibit G-3
Exhibit G-4
Exhibit G
Certification Documents
Certification of Consultant
Certification of
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters -
Primaiy Covered Transactions
Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit G -1(a) Certification of Consultant
I hereby certify that I am the and duly authorized representative of the firm of
whose address is
and that neither the above firm nor I have:
a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or other consideration,
any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT)
to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT;
b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the services of
any firm or person in connection with carrying out this AGREEMENT; or
c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely
for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in
connection with, procuring or carrying out this AGREEMENT; except as hereby expressly stated (if any);
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the
and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation in connection with this
AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and
Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Consultant (Firm Name)
Signature (Authorized Official of Consultant) Date
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit G -1(b) Certification of
I hereby certify that I am the:
p
❑ Other
of the , and
or its representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection
with obtaining or carrying out this AGREEMENT to:
a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ to retain, any firm or person; or
b) Pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration
of any kind; except as hereby expressly stated (if any):
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the
and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this
AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and
Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Signature
Date
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit G-2 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other
Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions
I. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
B. Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under
a public transaction; violation of Federal or State anti-trust statues or commission of embezzlement,
thcft, forgcly, bribcty, falsification or dcstruction of rccords, making falsc statcmcnts, or rccciving
stolen property;
C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
(Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b)
of this certification; and
D. Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this application / proposal had one or more public
transactions (Federal, State and local) terminated for cause or default.
II. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant (Firm Name)
Signature (Authorized Official of Consultant) Date
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit G-3 Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds
for Lobbying
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member
of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan,
the entering into of any cooperative AGREEMENT, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment,
or modification of Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative AGREEMENT.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative AGREEMENT, the undersigned shall complete and submit
Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into
this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000.00, and not more than $100,000.00,
for each such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require
that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier sub -contracts, which exceed $100,000,
and that all such sub -recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Consultant (Firm Name)
Signature (Authorized Official of Consultant) Date
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit G-4 Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data
This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in section
2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15.403-4) submitted,
either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the Contracting Officer or to the Contracting Officer's
representative in support of * are accurate, complete, and current
as of
**
This certification includes the cost or pricing data supporting any advance AGREEMENT's and forward pricing
rate AGREEMENT's between the offer or and the Government that are part of the proposal.
Firm:
Signature
Date of Execution***:
Title
*Identify the proposal, quotation, request for pricing adjustment, or other submission involved, giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g. project title.)
**Insert the day, month, and year, when price negotiations were concluded and price AGREEMENT was reached.
***Insert the day, month, and year, of signing, which should be as close as practicable to the date when the price negotiations were concluded and the
contract price was agreed to.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit H
Liability Insurance Increase
To Be Used Only If Insurance Requirements Are Increased
The professional liability limit of the CONSULTANT to the AGENCY identified in Section XII, Legal Relations
and Insurance of this Agreement is amended to $
The CONSULTANT shall provide Professional Liability insurance with minimum per occurrence limits in the
amount of $
Such insurance coverage shall be evidenced by one of the following methods:
• Certificate of Insurance.
• Self-insurance through an irrevocable Letter of Credit from a qualified financial institution.
Self-insurance through documentation of a separate fund established exclusively for the payment of professional
liability claims, including claim amounts already reserved against the fund, safeguards established for payment
from the fund, a copy of the latest annual financial statements, and disclosure of the investment portfolio for
those funds.
Should the minimum Professional Liability insurance limit required by the AGENCY as specified above exceed
$1 million per occurrence or the value of the contract, whichever is greater, then justification shall be submitted
to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for approval to increase the minimum insurance limit.
If FHWA approval is obtained, the AGENCY may, at its own cost, reimburse the CONSULTANT for the additional
professional liability insurance required.
Notes: Cost of added insurance requirements: $
• Include all costs, fee increase, premiums.
• This cost shall not be billed against an FHWA funded project.
• For final contracts, include this exhibit.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit H Page 1 of 1
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit I
Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
The purpose of this exhibit is to establish a procedure to determine if a consultant's alleged design error is of a
nature that exceeds the accepted standard of care. In addition, it will establish a uniform method for the resolution
and/or- cost recovery procedures in those instances where the agency believes it has suffered some material damage
due to the alleged error by the consultant.
Step 1 Potential Consultant Design Error(s) is Identified by Agency's Project Manager
At the first indication of potential consultant design error(s), the first step in the process is for the Agency's
project manager to notify the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer regarding the potential design
error(s). For federally funded projects, the Region Local Programs Engineer should be informed and
involved in these procedures. (Note: The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer may appoint an
agency staff person other than the project manager, who has not been as directly involved in the project,
to be responsible for the remaining steps in these procedures.)
Step 2 Project Manager Documents the Alleged Consultant Design Error(s)
After discussion of the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged error(s), and with the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer's concurrence, the project manager obtains more detailed
documentation than is normally required on the project. Examples include: all decisions and descriptions
of work; photographs, records of labor, materials and equipment.
Step 3 Contact the Consultant Regarding the Alleged Design Error(s)
If it is determined that there is a need to proceed further, the next step in the process is for the project
manager to contact the consultant regarding the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the all
error(s). The project manager and other appropriate agency staff should represent the agency and the
consultant should be represented by their project manager and any personnel (including sub -consultants)
deemed appropriate for the alleged design error(s) issue.
Step 4 Attempt to Resolve Alleged Design Error with Consultant
After the meeting(s) with the consultant have been completed regarding the consultant's alleged design
error(s), there are three possible scenarios:
• It is determined via mutual agreement that there is not a consultant design error(s). If this is the case,
then the process will not proceed beyond this point.
It is determined via mutual agreement that a consultant design error(s) occurred. If this is the case,
then the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, or their representatives, negotiate a settlement
with the consultant. The settlement would be paid to the agency or the amount would be reduced from
the consultant's agreement with the agency for the services on the project in which the design error
took place. The agency is to provide LP, through the Region Local Programs Engineer, a summary
of the settlement for review and to make adjustments, if any, as to how the settlement affects federal
reimbursements. No further action is required.
• There is not a mutual agreement regarding the alleged consultant design error(s). The consultant may
request that the alleged design error(s) issue be forwarded to the Director of Public Works or Agency
Engineer for review. If the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, after review with their legal
counsel, is not able to reach mutual agreement with the consultant, proceed to Step 5.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit I Page 1 of 2
Revised 10/30/2014
Step 5 Forward Documents to Local Programs
For federally funded projects all available information, including costs, should be forwarded through the
Region Local Programs Engineer to LP for their review and consultation with the FHWA. LP will meet
with representatives of the agency and the consultant to review the alleged design error(s), and attempt
to find a resolution to the issue. If necessary, LP will request assistance from the Attorney General's Office
for legal interpretation. LP will also identify how the alleged error(s) affects eligibility of project costs
for federal reimbursement.
• If mutual agreement is reached, the agency and consultant adjust the scope of work and costs
to reflect the agreed upon resolution. LP, in consultation with FHWA, will identify the amount
of federal participation in the agreed upon resolution of the issue.
• If mutual agreement is not reached, the agency and consultant may seek settlement by arbitration
or by litigation.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit I Page 2 of 2
Revised 10/30/2014
Exhibit J
Consultant Claim Procedures
The purpose of this exhibit is to describe a procedure regarding claim(s) on a consultant agreement. The following
procedures should only be utilized on consultant claims greater than $1,000. If the consultant's claim(s) are a total
of $1,000 or less, it would not be cost effective to proceed through the outlined steps. It is suggested that the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer negotiate a fair and reasonable price for the consultant's claim(s)
that total $1,000 or less.
This exhibit will outline the procedures to be followed by the consultant and the agency to consider a potential
claim by the consultant.
Step 1 Consultant Files a Claim with the Agency Project Manager
If the consultant determines that they were requested to perform additional services that were outside
of the agreement's scope of work, they may be entitled to a claim. The first step that must be completed
is the request for consideration of the claim to the Agency's project manager.
The consultant's claim must outline the following:
• Summation of hours by classification for each firm that is included in the claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work;
• Timeframe of the additional work that was outside of the project scope;
• Summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs associated with
the additional work; and
• Explanation as to why the consultant believes the additional work was outside of the agreement
scope of work.
Step 2 Review by Agency Personnel Regarding the Consultant's Claim for Additional Compensation
After the consultant has completed step 1, the next step in the process is to forward the request to the
Agency's project manager. The project manager will review the consultant's claim and will met with the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer to determine if the Agency agrees with the claim. If the
FHWA is participating in the project's funding, forward a copy of the consultant's claim and the Agency's
recommendation for federal participation in the claim to the WSDOT Local Programs through the Region
Local Programs Engineer. If the claim is not eligible for federal participation, payment will need to be from
agency funds.
If the Agency project manager, Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, WSDOT Local Programs
(if applicable), and FHWA (if applicable) agree with the consultant's claim, send a request memo, including
backup documentation to the consultant to either supplement the agreement, or create a new agreement
for the claim. After the request has been approved, the Agency shall write the supplement and/or new
agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim. Inform the consultant that the final payment for
the agreement is subject to audit. No further action in needed regarding the claim procedures.
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, proceed to step 3 of the procedures.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit J Page 1 of 2
Revised 10/30/2014
Step 3 Preparation of Support Documentation Regarding Consultant's Claim(s)
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, the project manager shall prepare a summary
for the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer that included the following:
• Copy of information supplied by the consultant regarding the claim;
• Agency's summation of hours by classification for each firm that should be included in the claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work;
• Agency's summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs associated
with the additional work;
• Explanation regarding those areas in which the Agency does/does not agree with the consultant's
claim(s);
• Explanation to describe what has been instituted to preclude future consultant claim(s); and
• Recommendations to resolve the claim.
Step 4 Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer Reviews Consultant Claim and Agency Documentation
The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall review and administratively approve or disapprove
the claim, or portions thereof, which may include getting Agency Council or Commission approval (as
appropriate to agency dispute resolution procedures). If the project involves federal participation, obtain
concurrence from WSDOT Local Programs and FHWA regarding final settlement of the claim. If the claim
is not eligible for federal participation, payment will need to be from agency funds.
Step 5 Informing Consultant of Decision Regarding the Claim
The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall notify (in writing) the consultant of their final
decision regarding the consultant's claim(s). Include the final dollar amount of the accepted claim(s)
and rationale utilized for the decision.
Step 6 Preparation of Supplement or New Agreement for the Consultant's Claim(s)
The agency shall write the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount
of the claim. Inform the consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit J Page 2 of 2
Revised 10/30/2014
asjnoo J,., ul°aunow Ppg
N
U
O
J
U
w
O
ry
n
17
III
Z
O
LU
2
'w
m
LL
O
A
�J
O
ry
LU
J
J
ry
LL
LU
m
r�
�/
LU
Of
z
a
] }uowa6pi8l ❑
z
P!J}uaJB
3N PD08
'GA Plald
an 6wJoj
DJpuos 'any ¢ ulgol
❑
Of
a
a-
w Benita Dr. NE
z
Jalung
uosu o
°1bJJagsuDH
T
U
�D
al6ui}s
Ja;ulod
lwoDN
sau6y
z
O
Q
U
O
J
U
w
O
ry
n
,�R
JQ
Q \Oe
U)
FA
•any wgod ny uDb '}s spiow
a 'any pile w a 'a y auDJ� o '4s qon
� M
' ny aospalg auD�c •any s lll!4d 'any �' }JDMa;s
v_
auD� ? 3 0
c c Ja �JDd N o N 'any uIDIDDh N
❑ _
a ❑ > N
'any a}}alpD M -
w w a
any a;;all!D Id IJoad z
❑
a L
L
U
° 3N 'P2] auld U) (n
- c
J L
N VI � J
of ld �Oor
U.
o 3 pooh la�loi,y w
ac °
`❑
j
C/)
�
auoD auld Z
w w w r� Gvq
Q
Z
Q
O
O
i
LL,
Q
U
22<
W
W
7
LL
7
OL
OCU
U
U
Q
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Accept US Department of
Transportation Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Innovative Safety Grant;
and Approve WSDOT Local Agency
Agreement for West Belfair Valley and
Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety
Projects
7A
Study Session Date: March 8, 2017
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15. 2017
Department:
PW&U
Presenter:
Knuckey
Phone:
(360) 473-2376
SUMMARY: The City has been offered a Highway Safety Improvement Grant under the 2016
Innovative Safety Program to construct high friction pavement and guardrails on both West Belfair
Valley and Tracyton Beach Roads. The project cost is $1,675,490. The grant requires a 10% match;
however, the match is waived for each project phase that begins before August 31, 2017. To obtain
construction obligation before the August 31 deadline the project must be expedited. The offered
grant will be in WSDOT Standard Forms, with their standard terms and conditions.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Grant Award Letter, 2. Site Plan, 3. Local Agency Agreement, 4. Local Agency
Federal Aid Prospectus (blank)
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The 10% match for design (Preliminary
Engineering) will be waived. The construction match is identified as $148,273, and will be waived
assuming construction obligation is received by August 31, 2017. This project is not included in the
2017 budget, but will be added at mid -year.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ❑x No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ Consent Agenda 0 General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to accept the US Department of Transportation Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Innovative Safety Grant; approve the Local Agency Agreement with WSDOT for West Belfair Valley
Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Projects; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and
execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve
Form Updated 01/07/15
❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Mr. Chal Martin
Public Works Director
City of Bremerton
100 Oyster Bay Avenue N
Bremerton, Washington 98312
WUuWu�
Transportation Building
310 Maple Park Avenue S E.
P.O. Box 47300
Olympia, WA 98504-7300
December 21, 2016 360-705-7000
TTY: 1-800-833-6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
�et(qf
U'
City of Bremerton
2016 Innovative Safety Program
Federal Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Funding
WSDOT is pleased to advise you that the following HSIP project has been selected to receive federal
funding and is limited to the amount shown below:
Project Title: West Belfair Valley Road & Tracyton Beach Road $1,675,490
Scope: See attached Project Summary for detailed project description and locations. Please include the
Project Summary with project authorization documentation as part of the scope of work.
Note: Safety projects require a 10 percent local match for design, right of way and construction.
However, if any phase is authorized by August 31, 2017, no match is required for all eligible
expenses in that phase.
In order to meet state and federal requirements, the following are required:
■ Projects utilizing federal funds must be included in your current Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) as a complete programmed project. Once your TIP amendment is approved,
WSDOT will amend the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
■ Project expenditures incurred before receiving notice from Local Programs of federal fund
obligation are not eligible for reimbursement.
■ Any changes in scope, schedule or budget will require approval from HQ Local Programs.
■ To maintain funding, a Quarterly Project Report form (including schedule, scopes and budget)
must be completed by the end of March, June, September and December each year. The online
database can be found at: hM://www.wsdot.wa.gov/locall2ro rg ams/. To access the database,
you will need an account name and password. Your account name is � and your
password is�. The password is case sensitive.
To obligate funding for the project, please refer to the information above and your Local Agency
Guidelines (LAG) manual for additional information. As a reminder, Local Programs encourages all
agencies to submit monthly progress billings to ensure timely reimbursement of eligible federal
expenditures.
For assistance please contact Neal Campbell, your Region Local Programs Engineer, at 360.357.2666.
Sincerely,
knth�lee'nIB Davis
Director
Local Programs
KBD:dk:ac
Attachment
cc: Neal Campbell, Olympic Region Local Programs Engineer, MS 47440
Project Summary
Program: 2016 Innovative Safety Program
Date: December 2016
Agency: City of Bremerton
Project Title: West Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Project
Project Number: Not yet assigned
Project Type: High friction surface treatment(s)
Project Description: Design for and construct high friction surface treatment, drainage improvements, warning signs, and
guardrail.
Detailed Project Description:
A. On West Belfair Valley Road (1) from the US Navy Railroad to approximately 300 feet east of Gold Mountain Golf Course
Road (Segment 1) and (2) from approximately 3,300 feet east of Gold Mountain Golf Course Road to approximately 5,300
feet east of Gold Mountain Golf Course Road (Segment 2):
1. Apply high friction surface treatment. Includes associated pavement markings.
2. Evaluate/upgrade existing and add new warning signs.
3. Install guardrail in two locations in Segment 1 and three locations in Segment 2.
B. On Tracyton Beach Road:
1. Apply high friction surface treatment from the North city limit for Kitsap County/City of Bremerton to approximately
1,900 feet south of that limit. Includes associated pavement markings.
2. Evaluate/upgrade existing and add new warning signs from the city limit for Kitsap County/City of Bremerton to
approximately 1,900 feet south of that limit.
3. Install guardrail from the city limit the North city limit for Kitsap County/City of Bremerton to the South city limit.
4. Install three catch basins and approximately 500 linear feet of storm drain pipe to eliminate ponding and ice on the
roadway within curves.
Project Schedule (Estimated):
Project added to the local jurisdiction's Transportation Improvement Program TIP
7/2015
Project added to the Regional TIP
1/2017
Project added to the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program STIP
3/2017
Project agreement signed
3/2017
Begin PE PE authorized by WSDOT/FHWA
3/2017
National Environmental Policy Act NEPA kickoff
3/2017
Environmental documents approved
5/2017
Right-of-way started
NA
Right-of-way completed certification
NA
Geometric/30% design complete
5/2017
Geometric/60% design complete
7/2017
End PE
8/2017
Contract advertised
8/2017
Contract awarded
8/2017
Open to the public (operationally complete)
10/2017
Construction complete
12/2017
Page 1 of 2
Project Cost and Award Amount:
Phase
Total cost
10% local
Amount
10% Match
Amount
Amount
match
funded from
provided
requested
awarded
required
previous
(From City
federal funds
of
(Does not
Bremerton
count toward
Street
the local
Fund)
match
Preliminary
$192,760
$19,276*
$0
$19,276*
$173,484*
$173,484*
Engineering
—Right -of -Way
$0
$0*
$0
$0*
$0*
$0*
Construction
$1,482,730
$148,273*
$0
$148,273*
$1,334,457*
$1,334,457*
Total
$1,675,490
$167,549
$0
$167,549
$1,507,941
$1,507,941
*Project phase must be obligated by August 31, 2017 to waive the 10% local match requirement.
Page 2 of 2
asjnoo J,., ul°aunow Ppg
N
U
O
J
U
w
O
ry
n
17
III
Z
O
LU
2
'w
m
LL
O
A
�J
O
ry
LU
J
J
ry
LL
LU
m
r�
�/
LU
Of
z
a
] }uowa6pi8l ❑
z
P!J}uaJB
3N PD08
'GA Plald
an 6wJoj
DJpuos 'any ¢ ulgol
❑
Of
a
a-
w Benita Dr. NE
z
Jalung
uosu o
°1bJJagsuDH
T
U
�D
al6ui}s
Ja;ulod
lwoDN
sau6y
z
O
Q
U
O
J
U
w
O
ry
n
,�R
JQ
Q \Oe
U)
FA
•any wgod ny uDb '}s spiow
a 'any pile w a 'a y auDJ� o '4s qon
� M
' ny aospalg auD�c •any s lll!4d 'any �' }JDMa;s
v_
auD� ? 3 0
c c Ja �JDd N o N 'any uIDIDDh N
❑ _
a ❑ > N
'any a}}alpD M -
w w a
any a;;all!D Id IJoad z
❑
a L
L
U
° 3N 'P2] auld U) (n
- c
J L
N VI � J
of ld �Oor
U.
o 3 pooh la�loi,y w
ac °
`❑
j
C/)
�
auoD auld Z
w w w r� Gvq
Q
Z
Q
O
O
i
LL,
Q
U
22<
W
W
7
LL
7
OL
OCU
U
U
Q
Auk
Washington State
TAf Department of Transportation
Agency City of Bremerton
Address 345 6th Street, Suite 600
Bremerton, WA 98337
Local Agency Agreement
CFDA No. 20.205
(Catalog or Federal Domestic Assistance)
Project No.
Agreement No.
For OSC WSDOT Use Only
The Local Agency having complied, or hereby agreeing to comply, with the terms and conditions set forth in (1) Title 23, U.S. Code
Highways, (2) the regulations issued pursuant thereto, (3) 2 CFR Part 200, (4) the policies and procedures promulgated by the
Washington State Department of Transportation, and (5) the federal aid project agreement entered into between the State and Federal
Government, relative to the above project, the Washington State Department of Transportation will authorize the Local Agency to
proceed on the project by a separate notification. Federal funds which are to be obligated for the project may not exceed the amount
shown herein on line r, column 3, without written authority by the State, subject to the approval of the Federal Highway Administration.
All project costs not reimbursed by the Federal Government shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency.
Project Description
Name West Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Project Length N/A
Termini West Belfair Valley Road @ Kitsap County Line; Tracyton Beach Road @ Kitsap County Line
Description of Work
Design and construction high friction pavement, guardrail, signage, delineation and other improvements along Belfair Valley Road
and Tracyton Beach Road.
Project Agreement End Date 1/31/2018 Claiming Indirect Cost Rate
Proposed Advertisement Date 8/1/2017 [:]Yes ❑✓ No
Agency Official
By
Title patty Lent
Mayor, City of Bremerton
DOT Form 140-039
Revised 05/2015
Washington State Department of Transportation
By
Director, Local Programs
Date Executed
Page 1
Estimate of Fundin
(t)
(2)
(3)
Type of Work
Estimated Total
Estimated Agency
Estimated Federal
Project Funds
Funds
Funds
PE a.Agency
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
100 % b. Other HDR
$ 146,699.30
$ 146,699.30
Federal Aid c. Other
Participation d. State
$ 5,000.00
$ 5,000.00
Ratio for PE
e. Total PE Cost Estimate a+b+c+d
$171,699.30
$ 0.00
$ 171,699.30
Right of Wayo f. Agency
g. Other
Federal Aid
h. Other
Participation
Ratio for RW i. State
'. Total R/W Cost Estimate f+ +h+i
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
Construction k. Contract
100 % 1. Other
m. Other
Federal Aid n. Other
Participation
o. A enc
Ratio for CN
p. State
q. Total CN Cost Estimate k+l+m+n+o+
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
r. Total Pro'ect Cost Estimate a+m+
$171,699.30
$ 0.00
$ 171,699.30
Agency Official
By
Title patty Lent
Mayor, City of Bremerton
DOT Form 140-039
Revised 05/2015
Washington State Department of Transportation
By
Director, Local Programs
Date Executed
Page 1
Construction Method of Financing (Check Method Selected)
State Ad and Award
Method A - Advance Payment - Agency Share of total construction cost (based on contract award)
Method B - Withhold from gas tax the Agency's share of total construction coast (line 5, column 2) in the amount of
$ at $ per month for months.
Local Force or Local Ad and Award
Method C - Agency cost incurred with partial reimbursement
The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and
as a condition to payment of hte federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions
set forth below. Adopted by official action on
, Resolution/Ordinance No.
Provisions
I. Scope of Work
The Agency shall provide all the work, labor, materials, and services necessary to perform the project which is described and set
forth in detail in the "Project Description" and "Type of Work."
When the State acts for and on behalf of the Agency, the State shall be deemed an agent of the Agency and shall perform the
services described and indicated in "Type of Work" on the face of this agreement, in accordance with plans and specifications as
proposed by the Agency and approved by the State and the Federal Highway Administration.
When the State acts for the Agency but is not subject to the right of control by the Agency, the State shall have the right to perform
the work subject to the ordinary procedures of the State and Federal Highway Administration.
II. Delegation of Authority
The State is willing to fulfill the responsibilities to the Federal Government by the administration of this project. The Agency agrees
that the State shall have the full authority to carry out this administration. The State shall review, process, and approve documents
required for federal aid reimbursement in accordance with federal requirements. If the State advertises and awards the contract, the
State will further act for the Agency in all matters concerning the project as requested by the Agency. If the Local Agency advertises and
awards the project, the State shall review the work to ensure conformity with the approved plans and specifications.
III. Project Administration
Certain types of work and services shall be provided by the State on this project as requested by the Agency and described in the
Type of Work above. In addition, the State will furnish qualified personnel for the supervision and inspection of the work in progress. On
Local Agency advertised and awarded projects, the supervision and inspection shall be limited to ensuring all work is in conformance
with approved plans, specifications, and federal aid requirements. The salary of such engineer or other supervisor and all other salaries
and costs incurred by State forces upon the project will be considered a cost thereof. All costs related to this project incurred by
employees of the State in the customary manner on highway payrolls and vouchers shall be charged as costs of the project.
IV. Availability of Records
All project records in support of all costs incurred and actual expenditures kept by the Agency are to be maintained in accordance
with local government accounting procedures prescribed by the Washington State Auditor's Office, the U.S. Department of
Transportation, and the Washington State Department of Transportation. The records shall be open to inspection by the State and
Federal Government at all reasonable times and shall be retained and made available for such inspection for a period of not less than
three years from the final payment of any federal aid funds to the Agency. Copies of said records shall be furnished to the State and/or
Federal Government upon request.
V. Compliance with Provisions
The Agency shall not incur any federal aid participation costs on any classification of work on this project until authorized in writing
by the State for each classification. The classifications of work for projects are:
1. Preliminary engineering.
2. Right of way acquisition.
3. Project construction.
Once written authorization is given, the Agency agrees to show continuous progress through monthly billings. Failure to show
continuous progress may result the Agency's project becoming inactive, as described in 23 CFR 630, and subject to de -obligation of
federal aid funds and/or agreement closure.
If right of way acquisition, or actual construction of the road for which preliminary engineering is undertaken is not started by the
close of the tenth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which preliminary engineering phase was authorized, the Agency will repay to
the State the sum or sums of federal funds paid to the Agency under the terms of this agreement (see Section IX).
If actual construction of the road for which right of way has been purchased is not started by the close of the tenth fiscal year
following the fiscal year in which the right of way phase was authorized, the Agency will repay to the State the sum or sums of federal
funds paid to the Agency under the terms of this agreement (see Section IX).
DOT Form 140-039 Page 2
Revised 05/2015
The Agency agrees that all stages of construction necessary to provide the initially planned complete facility within the limits of this
project will conform to at least the minimum values set by approved statewide design standards applicable to this class of highways,
even though such additional work is financed without federal aid participation.
The Agency agrees that on federal aid highway construction projects, the current federal aid regulations which apply to liquidated
damages relative to the basis of federal participation in the project cost shall be applicable in the event the contractor fails to complete
the contract within the contract time.
VI. Payment and Partial Reimbursement
The total cost of the project, including all review and engineering costs and other expenses of the State, is to be paid by the Agency
and by the Federal Government. Federal funding shall be in accordance with the Federal Transportation Act, as amended, 2 CFR Part
200. The State shall not be ultimately responsible for any of the costs of the project. The Agency shall be ultimately responsible for all
costs associated with the project which are not reimbursed by the Federal Government. Nothing in this agreement shall be construed as
a promise by the State as to the amount or nature of federal participation in this project.
The Agency shall bill the state for federal aid project costs incurred in conformity with applicable federal and state laws. The agency
shall minimize the time elapsed between receipt of federal aid funds and subsequent payment of incurred costs. Expenditures by the
Local Agency for maintenance, general administration, supervision, and other overhead shall not be eligible for federal participation
unless a current indirect cost plan has been prepared in accordance with the regulations outlined in 2 CFR Part 200 - Uniform Admin
Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, and retained for audit.
The State will pay for State incurred costs on the project. Following payment, the State shall bill the Federal Government for
reimbursement of those costs eligible for federal participation to the extent that such costs are attributable and properly allocable to
this project. The State shall bill the Agency for that portion of State costs which were not reimbursed by the Federal Government (see
Section IX).
1. Project Construction Costs
Project construction financing will be accomplished by one of the three methods as indicated in this agreement.
Method A — The Agency will place with the State, within (20) days after the execution of the construction contract, an advance in the
amount of the Agency's share of the total construction cost based on the contract award. The State will notify the Agency of the exact
amount to be deposited with the State. The State will pay all costs incurred under the contract upon presentation of progress billings
from the contractor. Following such payments, the State will submit a billing to the Federal Government for the federal aid participation
share of the cost. When the project is substantially completed and final actual costs of the project can be determined, the State will
present the Agency with a final billing showing the amount due the State or the amount due the Agency. This billing will be cleared by
either a payment from the Agency to the State or by a refund from the State to the Agency.
Method B — The Agency's share of the total construction cost as shown on the face of this agreement shall be withheld from its
monthly fuel tax allotments. The face of this agreement establishes the months in which the withholding shall take place and the exact
amount to be withheld each month. The extent of withholding will be confirmed by letter from the State at the time of contract award.
Upon receipt of progress billings from the contractor, the State will submit such billings to the Federal Government for payment of its
participating portion of such billings.
Method C — The Agency may submit vouchers to the State in the format prescribed by the State, in duplicate, not more than once
per month for those costs eligible for Federal participation to the extent that such costs are directly attributable and properly allocable
to this project. Expenditures by the Local Agency for maintenance, general administration, supervision, and other overhead shall not be
eligible for Federal participation unless claimed under a previously approved indirect cost plan.
The State shall reimburse the Agency for the Federal share of eligible project costs up to the amount shown on the face of this
agreement. At the time of audit, the Agency will provide documentation of all costs incurred on the project. The State shall bill the
Agency for all costs incurred by the State relative to the project. The State shall also bill the Agency for the federal funds paid by the
State to the Agency for project costs which are subsequently determined to be ineligible for federal participation (see Section IX).
VII. Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts
The Agency, if services of a consultant are required, shall be responsible for audit of the consultant's records to determine eligible
federal aid costs on the project. The report of said audit shall be in the Agency's files and made available to the State and the Federal
Government.
An audit shall be conducted by the WSDOT Internal Audit Office in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing
standards as issued by the United States General Accounting Office by the Comptroller General of the United States; WSDOT Manual
M 27-50, Consultant Authorization, Selection, and Agreement Administration; memoranda of understanding between WSDOT and
FHWA; and 2 CFR Part 200.501 - Audit Requirements.
If upon audit it is found that overpayment or participation of federal money in ineligible items of cost has occurred, the Agency shall
reimburse the State for the amount of such overpayment or excess participation (see Section IX).
VIII. Single Audit Act
The Agency, as a subrecipient of federal funds, shall adhere to the federal regulations outlined in 2 CFR Part 200.501 as well as all
applicable federal and state statutes and regulations. A subrecipient who expends $750,000 or more in federal awards from all sources
during a given fiscal year shall have a single or program -specific audit performed for that year in accordance with the provisions of 2
CFR Part 200.501. Upon conclusion of the audit, the Agency shall be responsible for ensuring that a copy of the report is transmitted
promptly to the State.
DOT Form 140-039 Page 3
Revised 05/2015
IX. Payment of Billing
The Agency agrees that if payment or arrangement for payment of any of the State's billing relative to the project (e.g., State force
work, project cancellation, overpayment, cost ineligible for federal participation, etc.) is not made to the State within 45 days after
the Agency has been billed, the State shall effect reimbursement of the total sum due from the regular monthly fuel tax allotments to
the Agency from the Motor Vehicle Fund. No additional Federal project funding will be approved until full payment is received unless
otherwise directed by the Director, Local Programs.
Project Agreement End Date - This date is based on your projects Period of Performance (2 CFR Part 200.309).
Any costs incurred after the Project Agreement End Date are NOT eligible for federal reimbursement. All eligible costs incurred prior
to the Project Agreement End Date must be submitted for reimbursement within 90 days after the Project Agreement End Date or they
become ineligible for federal reimbursement.
X. Traffic Control, Signing, Marking, and Roadway Maintenance
The Agency will not permit any changes to be made in the provisions for parking regulations and traffic control on this project
without prior approval of the State and Federal Highway Administration. The Agency will not install or permit to be installed any signs,
signals, or markings not in conformance with the standards approved by the Federal Highway Administration and MUTCD. The Agency
will, at its own expense, maintain the improvement covered by this agreement.
XI. Indemnity
The Agency shall hold the Federal Government and the State harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense
all claims, demands, or suits, whether at law or equity brought against the Agency, State, or Federal Government, arising from the
Agency's execution, performance, or failure to perform any of the provisions of this agreement, or of any other agreement or contract
connected with this agreement, or arising by reason of the participation of the State or Federal Government in the project, PROVIDED,
nothing herein shall require the Agency to reimburse the State or the Federal Government for damages arising out of bodily injury to
persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of the Federal Government or the State.
XII. Nondiscrimination Provision
No liability shall attach to the State or Federal Government except as expressly provided herein.
The Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any USDOT-
assisted contract and/or agreement or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26. The Agency
shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of
USDOT-assisted contracts and agreements. The WSDOT's DBE program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26 and as approved by USDOT,
is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms
shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the Agency of its failure to carry out its approved program, the
Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under
18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S. C. 3801 et seq.).
The Agency hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction work, or modification
thereof, as defined in the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor in 41 CFR Chapter 60, which is paid for in whole or in part with
funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant to a grant, contract, loan,
insurance, or guarantee or understanding pursuant to any federal program involving such grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee,
the required contract provisions for Federal -Aid Contracts (FHWA 1273), located in Chapter 44 of the Local Agency Guidelines.
The Agency further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment
practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work: Provided, that if the applicant so participating is a State or Local
Government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality, or subdivision of such government
which does not participate in work on or under the contract.
The Agency also agrees:
(1) To assist and cooperate actively with the State in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal
opportunity clause and rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
(2) To furnish the State such information as it may require for the supervision of such compliance and that it will otherwise assist the
State in the discharge of its primary responsibility for securing compliance.
(3) To refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with
a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, government contracts and federally assisted construction
contracts pursuant to the Executive Order.
(4) To carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors
and subcontractors by the State, Federal Highway Administration, or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, subpart D of the
Executive Order.
In addition, the Agency agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the State may take any or all of the
following actions:
(a) Cancel, terminate, or suspend this agreement in whole or in part;
(b) Refrain from extending any further assistance to the Agency under the program with respect to which the failure or refusal
occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the Agency; and
(c) Refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.
DOT Form 140-039 Page 4
Revised 05/2015
XIII. Liquidated Damages
The Agency hereby agrees that the liquidated damages provisions of 23 CFR Part 635, Subpart 127, as supplemented, relative to
the amount of Federal participation in the project cost, shall be applicable in the event the contractor fails to complete the contract within
the contract time. Failure to include liquidated damages provision will not relieve the Agency from reduction of federal participation in
accordance with this paragraph.
XIV. Termination for Public Convenience
The Secretary of the Washington State Department of Transportation may terminate the contract in whole, or from time to time in
part, whenever:
(1) The requisite federal funding becomes unavailable through failure of appropriation or otherwise.
(2) The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work as a direct result of an Executive Order of the President with
respect to the prosecution of war or in the interest of national defense, or an Executive Order of the President or Governor of
the State with respect to the preservation of energy resources.
(3) The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work by reason of a preliminary, special, or permanent restraining
order of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order is primarily caused by the acts or omissions of
persons or agencies other than the contractor.
(4) The Secretary is notified by the Federal Highway Administration that the project is inactive.
(5) The Secretary determines that such termination is in the best interests of the State.
XV. Venue for Claims and/or Causes of Action
For the convenience of the parties to this contract, it is agreed that any claims and/or causes of action which the Local Agency
has against the State of Washington, growing out of this contract or the project with which it is concerned, shall be brought only in the
Superior Court for Thurston County.
XVI. Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
The approving authority certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or
an employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the
making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment,
or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to
influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee
of a member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall
complete and submit the Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at
all tiers (including subgrants, and contracts and subcontracts under grants, subgrants, loans, and cooperative agreements) which
exceed $100,000, and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.
Submission of this certification as a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S.
Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than
$100,000 for each such failure.
XVII. Assurances
Local agencies receiving Federal funding from the USDOT or its operating administrations (i.e., Federal Highway Administration,
Federal Transit Administration, Federal Aviation Administration) are required to submit a written policy statement, signed by the Agency
Executive and addressed to the State, documenting that all programs, activities, and services will be conducted in compliance with
Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Additional Provisions
DOT Form 140-039 Page 5
Revised 05/2015
Aft
Washington State
TAf Department of Transportation
Local Agency Federal Aid
Project Prospectus
DOT Form 140-101 Page 1
Revised 04/2015 Previous Editions Obsolete
Prefix
Route
( )
Date
Federal Aid
Project Number
DUNS Number
LocalAgency
Project Number
WSDOT
Use Only J
Federal Employer
Tax ID Number
Agency
CAAgency
Yes No
Federal Program Title
20.205 Other
Project Title
Start Latitude N
End Latitude N
Start Longitude W
End Lon itude W
Project Termini From -To
Nearest City Name
Project Zip Code (+4)
Begin Mile Post
End Mile Post
Length of Project
Award Type
Local Local Forces State Railroad
Route ID
Begin Mile Point
End Mile Point
City Number
County Number
County Name
WSDOT Region
Legislative District(s)
Congressional District(s)
Urban Area Number
Phase
Total
Estimated Cost
Nearest Hundred Dollar
Local Agency
Funding
Nearest Hundred Dollar
Federal Funds
Nearest Hundred Dollar
Phase Start
Date
Month Year
P. E.
R/W
Const.
Total
Description of Existing Facility (Existing Design and Present Condition)
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Description of Proposed Work
Description of Proposed Work (Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary)
Local Agency Contact Person
Title
Phone
Mailing Address
City
State
Zip Code
Project Prospectus
By
Approving Authority
Title
Date
DOT Form 140-101 Page 1
Revised 04/2015 Previous Editions Obsolete
Agency
Project Title
Date
Type of Proposed Work
Project Type (Check all that Apply)
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
New Construction Path / Trail
3-R
Reconstruction Pedestrian / Facilities
2-R
Railroad Parking
Other
Bridge
Geometric Design Data
Description
Through Route
Crossroad
Principal Arterial
Principal Arterial
Federal
Minor Arterial
Minor Arterial
Urban
Urban
Functional
Rural
Collector
Rural
Collector
Classification
NHS
Major Collector
NHS
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Collector
Local Access
Local Access
Terrain
Flat
Roll Mountain
Flat
Roll Mountain
Posted Speed
Design Speed
Existing ADT
Design Year ADT
Design Year
Design Hourly Volume (DHV)
Performance of Work
Preliminary Engineering Will Be Performed By
Others
Agency
Construction Will Be Performed By
Contract
Agency
Environmental Classification
Class I - Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Class III - Categorically Excluded (CE)
Project Involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404
Projects Requiring Documentation
Interagency Agreement
(Documented CE)
Class III - Environmental Assessment (EA)
Project Involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404
Interagency Agreements
Environmental Considerations
DOT Form 140-101 Page 2
Revised 04/2015 Previous Editions Obsolete
Agency
Project Title
Date
Right of Way
No Right of Way Needed
Right of Way Needed
* All construction required by the
No Relocation Relocation Required
contract can be accomplished
within the exiting right of way.
Utilities
Railroad
No utility work required
No railroad work required
All utility work will be completed prior to the start
All railroad work will be completed prior to the start of
of the construction contract
the construction contract
All utility work will be completed in coordination
All the railroad work will be completed in coordination
with the construction contract
with the construction contract
Description of Utility Relocation or Adjustments and Existing Major Structures Involved in the Project
FAA Involvement
Is any airport located within 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) of the proposed project? Yes No
Remarks
This project has been reviewed by the legislative body of the administration agency or agencies, or it's
designee, and is not inconsistent with the agency's comprehensive plan for community development.
Agency
Date By
Mayor/Chairperson
DOT Form 140-101 Page 3
Revised 04/2015 Previous Editions Obsolete
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 3287 Study Session Date:
to accept and approve Annexation COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Proceedings for territory adjacent to Department:
Corbet Drive Presenter:
r =J
March 8, 2017
March 15, 2017
DCD
Allison Satter
Phone: (360)473-5845
SUMMARY: The City received a petition to annex on January 23, 2017. The petition method of
annexation is accomplished with two steps, the first is called the "10% petition" and the second is called
the "60% petition." The percentages refer to the laws requirement that the signatures on the petition
must represent either 10% (first petition) or 60% (second petition) of assessed value or acreage of land.
The proposed annexation uses the percentage of assessed value method.
After being notified of the proposed annexation, the City Council must set a date within 60 days of receipt
of the petition for a meeting with the initiating parties. The meeting is scheduled for March 15, 2017.
At this meeting the City Council must determine:
1) Whether the city will accept, reject or modify the proposed annexation;
2) Whether it will require simultaneous adoption of a Comprehensive Plan; and
3) Whether it will require assumption of all or any portions of existing city indebtedness by the area to
be annexed.
At the conclusion of the meeting on March 15, 2017, the City Council is expected to pass a resolution
which will allow the annexation to move forward procedurally, and allows the gathering of signatures for
the second step (60% petition).
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Resolution No. 3287 which includes:
• Exhibit 1) Notice of Intention of Commence Annexation Proceeding; and
• Exhibit 2) List of Petitioners of the Outside Utility Agreements, and
• Exhibit 3) Map of Proposed Territory for Annexation
• Exhibit 4) Parcel Details for Territory
• Exhibit 5) Pre -Land Use Designation Map
Corbet Drive Fiscal Analysis on Impacts of Annexation
• Attachment A) Potential Annexation Area Map
• Attachment B) Growth Assumptions
• Attachment C) Fiscal Impact of West Bremerton & Gorst UGA Report
• Attachment D) Rocky Point Handout
• Attachment E) Infrastructure Map
FISCAL IMPACTS: A Fiscal Analysis on Potential Annexation impacts has been included into this
packet as Attachment II
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ❑ No Presentation 0 Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ Consent Agenda o General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Resolution No. 3287 accepting and approving annexation proceedings for territory
adjacent to Corbet Drive.
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
RESOLUTION NO. 3287
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, accepting the proposal for annexation,
affirming the adoption of pre -land use designation of this
annexation area and requiring the assumption of all of the City's
existing indebtedness by the area to be annexed and authorizing the
circulation of a petition for annexation,.
WHEREAS, on January 23, 2017, the City received a Notice of Intention to
Commence Annexation Proceedings from owner of property at 1539 Corbet Drive as depicted in
Exhibit 1; and
WHEREAS, the City has Outside Utility Agreements for properties located in
close proximity to 1539 Corbet Drive, as listed in Exhibit 2, which grants consent to annexation;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed area for annexation is identified on the map in Exhibit
3, and further described in Exhibit 4; and
WHEREAS, the parties initiating the proposed annexation including Outside
Utility Agreements for properties ("Initiating Parties") are owners of not less than ten percent
(10%) in value of the property, according to the assessed valuation for which annexation is
petitioned; and
WHEREAS, the proposed area for annexation is located within the an Urban
Grown Area ("UGA"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council must meet with the Initiating Parties no later than
60 days after filing the request for annexation to consider the petition and decide whether it will
1) accept, reject, or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2) require the simultaneous
adoption of the comprehensive plan for the area proposed to be annexed; and 3) require the
assumption of all or any portion of City indebtedness by the area to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5299 passed on May 18, 2016, adopted the City's
Comprehensive Plan ("Plan") and established pre -annexation land use designations. The pre -
designations are contained within the Land Use Element of this Plan in a table known as the
"Equivalence Table," which established the City's equivalences for the Kitsap County Land Use
designations; and
WHEREAS, based on the Equivalence Table, the City established the Plan for the
proposed annexation area as is Medium Density Residential ("MDR") and Low Density
Residential ("LDR" ); and
Annexation — Corbet Drive
WHEREAS, City Council has set March 15, 2017, as the date that it will meet
with the Initiating Parties to consider the petition; and
WHEREAS, City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City to accept
the proposed annexation as presented, require the simultaneous adoption of the Plan for the area
proposed to be annexed, and require the assumption of all or any portion of City indebtedness by
the area to be annexed; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION]. The recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated by reference as
set forth herein in full.
SECTION 2. The Petition for Annexation of Territory to the City of Bremerton
attached hereto as Exhibit 1, the List of Outside Utility Agreement properties included as
Petitioners attached hereto as Exhibit 2, and the descriptions of the annexation area provided in
Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 are hereby accepted as presented without any geographic modification
to the area proposed to be annexed.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby affirms the adoption of pre -land use
designation for this annexation area that the 2016 Comprehensive Plan established as Medium
Density Residential ("MDR") and Low Density Residential ("LDR") designations as shown in
Exhibit 5.
SECTION 4. The City Council shall require the assumption of all existing City
indebtedness by the area to be annexed.
SECTION 5. To proceed with the proposed annexation, the Initiating Parties
shall be required to submit the appropriate petition to the City Council for consideration and
further action all deemed appropriate pursuant to RCW 35.13.130.
SECTION 6. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
2
Annexation — Corbet Drive
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this
day of )2017.
ERIC YOUNGER, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk
R:\Legal\Legal\Resolutions\Community Development\Annexation Corbet Dr. - 03.01.17.doe
Annexation — Corbet Drive
Exhibit 1
INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS
PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY
TO CITY OF BREMERTON
January 24th, 2017
City Council
City of Bremerton RECEIVED
345 6'h St. Suite 600
Bremerton, WA 98337 JAN 2 8 2017
Re: Corbet Parcel Annexation CITY CLERK
Dear City Councilmembers,
We the undersigned, who are the owners of not less than 10% of the value of property,
according to the assessed valuation records for general taxation purposes of the Assessor
of Kitsap County, of the following described real property situated in Kitsap County,
Washington, respectfully file this Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation
Proceedings ("Notice") requesting that said real property be annexed to the City of
Bremerton, Washington and we respectfully state as follows:
1. The area proposed to be annexed to the City is more particularly described as per the
legal description attached hereto as EXHIBIT A and made part of this Notice.
2. A plat map outlining the boundaries of the real property described is attached hereto
as EXHIBIT B and is made a part of this Notice.
3. The said area adjoins the existing boundaries of the City of Bremerton and is in Kitsap
County, and is within City of Bremerton's Urban Growth Area.
4. The undersigned Petitioners respectfully request that the City Council of the City of
Bremerton entertain this Notice and fix a date for a meeting with the initiating parties
within 60 days of the filing of this Notice as per RCW 35.15.125. The undersigned
Petitioners respectfully request that the City Council determine at said meeting whether it
will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; whether it will
require the simultaneous adoption of a comprehensive plan; and whether it will require
the assumption of all or any portion of existing city indebtedness by the area to be
annexed.
Joseph L. Keller.
Tax Ncel No. 152401-1-205-2001
y: Joseph L. Keller
Exhibit 1
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OF TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION
TO THE CITY OF BREMERTON
15241 E
THE EAST 350 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1
EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
e�XWisl —/ 8
3.144 o 11.00
-145
3.195 3 196
x•133
y -3.1.35-_3.194 3.197 012.02
•219 2-001
_ 1.213
2.0. 2.003
2.002 1.1911 -�
2.016
2.057
i� 2.040
] •19
2-017 2-006
2-019 2.028 -042
2-06
02-103S8
2-043
2-063 1.194
2.036
1.196
2.065
�.;---�
2-027
2.242
2.098
2.051 R4'*
2.097-
2.091 2.083
2.090 2-084
2.089
-189
1.195
1.200
1.202
? 1.20
1.204 1 2
017 00
018-00 01 •02
018.01
'019.00 019.01
020-03 020.01
020. 0
021.
002.04
Exhibit 1
010.04
011.04
r, 013.18
13.16 013.17
2 088
016.01
N N
F—
m
x
W
Z
LU Q
LU w w -1 O
Q Q Q O
U U U w 0 Z
N a
z Z
LU N
Qa Qa Qa 0 Z U
Ln Ln Ln O O
Z Z Z U U Z
J Q w
LU
W W W u z a a LL W N z
v oZs oZs oZs LU
_j w 0 N J U }
3 LU LU LU w °Z -i 0� LU m °� oZs z LU L Y
O a a a= W O D U o> z z
CL U= Z Z= J z Z
Q ww w
O m m m w= 0 0 w L Q w Q Q 2 w
a w w w U Z Q Z Z N
w LL LL m N o a a< w Q - 2i a Z op z z~}
� 0 0 Z Z w O= J< 0U' 0U' a
U U U O w Q D D w O v w Y -i 0 0 0
U Ln Ln Ln 2 2 w� Ln Ln Z U R Z Ln LL== 8-
0 0
v v
N N N 0 0 N N N N > N N
> > > U U > > > > > >
v v
N 0 0 0 2 2-- 0 0 0 0 0 0
W v vLU %% v v v v v v' m ' v
W o v v-0-0� ��-0-0-0-0-0-0 co �
Z 0 0 0 rn rn c c 0 0 0 0 0 r, O r, o
Q U U U a U U U U U c0 U U
O Q i --I M l0 rl Q
O ul O O M M� M ,� O
O O Ol m I, N N n n n n n n n n O O n O Ln
O Z Z ri ri ri M M ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri Z M ri M ri
_ wLU LU LU
J J J ZZ
F z = = = O O
=== a W 0 0 0
d } w r r r z z o
Z J J J
Z Z
N O z Q w w w Z Q Q Q
Q l7 l7 l7 c Z 0 m m m w Vn O N V)co
w w w Q NLt) O O CO 2i� CLU
O z >�> N N j
E CO CO CO Z Z w Z Z 0 Y Y Y m W c2S c2S
O w w w a O w a s c2S c2S c2S Q Z w Z w cz
z===� H O w w °� Z Z Z °� _ Q O Q w
W W W LU o o U U r 0 0 0W>- w_
o U o J>= m m m m J Q U =} U a U a
Z
CW
G
W °� 00 0000 0000 0000
W Z O O O O 'tt M M X 00 �D �D �D N Lr) O O O O M
N U'IU)Lr) O N lD lD 00 00 O N N N N N O O lD O�
LL OO
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O r-4 O
M M M 00 Ol Ln ri M M Lr) ri ri ri zt r4 ri zt i --I Rt
O M O O O M M M N N i --I ri ri ri N
I� n n'tt 00 n 00 i --I ri 00 n n n�D �D n n O n N
zT TZT O�D N N Ln Ln O Ln Ln Ln O M O O O u'I
r Q Ol Ol Ol N Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol N Ol Ol Ol 00 Ol N N 00 N Ol
LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
J O a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
O N N m O ZT w rl O Ln I, Ln m rl GO lD ZT Ln
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
W
Q 0 0 0 l0 O Ol N M N M M M M i --I ri ri
N l0 l0 l0 l0 I� n n n n n n n n Ol Ol
i GO GO GO GO GO GO GO N N N w w w N w w X Ln Ln N
O n n n n n n n u) u) u) n n n u) n n n n n Ln
a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
LL _
OM
N M It un m co O Mzt ul r� w m O ul M
Q� i --I ri ri ri N N N N N N N N M M M
N cc� x
� G W
J v
Exhibit 3
City of Bremerton
Area Proposed for
Annexation
10% Petition
March 2017
1
2 3
40 4
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 ed f9r
18 20 21 22
23
26
29
20 27 2
30 31 32 33 34
37
38
Legend
CProposed Territory for Annexation
Outside Utility Agreement (OUA)
Initial Petitioner
City Limits
Urban Growth Area (UGA)
Exhibit 4
Parcel Detail
Proposed for Annexation to the City of Bremerton
Parcel 1
3786-000-010-0705 —1919 Corbet Dr NW
THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE SOUTH 260 FEET OF TRACT 10, AND THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE SOUTH 260
FEET OF THE EAST 66 FEET OF TRACT 11, PHINNEY BAY WATER FRONT TRACTS, LYING SOUTH OF BOND
PROJECT NO. 13, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 OF PLATS, PAGE 17, IN KITSAP COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
Parcel 2
3786-000-011-0100 - No Site Address
BLK 000 LOT 11 D-01'2' E 66FT OF S 260FT EX S 80FT & EX N 60FT OF S 140FT & EX N 60FT
Parcel 3
3786-000-010-0101- No Site Address
BLK 000 LOT 10 D-01'3' N 60FT OF S 200FT
Parcel 4
3786-000-010-0606 —1911 Corbet Dr NW
BLK-000 LOT -10 D-06 1 N 60FT OF S 140FT BLK 000 LOT 11 N 60FT OF S 140FT OF E 66FT
Parcel 5
3786-000-010-0002 —1903 Corbet Dr NW
THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF LOTS 10 AND 11, PHINNEY BAY WATER FRONT TRACTS, LYING SOUTH OF BEND
PROJECT NO. 13, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 OF PLATS, PAGE 17, RECORDS OF
KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 6
152401-1-213-2001— No Site Address
LOT C, SHORT PLAT NO. 7224 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200307110206/0207, IN VOLUME
17 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 199. BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS DEPICTED ON THE SHORT PLAT.
Parcel 7
152401-1-212-2002 — 1759 Corbet Dr NW
LOT B, SHORT PLAT NO. 7224 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200307110206/0207, IN VOLUME
17 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 199, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS DEPICTED ON THE SHORT PLAT.
Parcel 8
152401-1-211-2003 — 1763 Corbet Dr NW
LOT A, SHORT PLAT NO. 7224 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200307110206/0207, IN VOLUME
17 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 199, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS DEPICTED ON THE SHORT PLAT.
Exhibit 4
Parcel 9
3787-000-001-0002 —1756 Corbet Dr NW
THE WEST 175 FEET OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN
VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF
FOR ROAD PURPOSES.
Parcel 10
3787-000-001-0309 — 3213 19" St.
THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY'S 2 1/2 ACRE TRACT, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME
5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A
POINT 175 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE EAST 60 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 166.45 FEET; THENCE WEST 60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 166.45 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 11
3787-000-001-0200 — 3203 19" St.
THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF
PLATS, PAGE 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 235 EAST OF THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1, BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING EAST 87 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 166.45 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE WEST 87
FEET; THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET DEEDED TO
KITSAP COUNTY, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 12
3787-000-001-0408 — 3193 NW 19" St.
LOT A, SHORT PLAT NO. 5761, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 9111010087/0088; BEING
THE WEST 92.00 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT
RECORDED IN VOLUME 5, OF PLATS, ON PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 322.00 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1;
THENCE EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1;
THENCE SOUTH, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID TRACT 1, TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
Parcel 13
3787-000-001-0507 — 3183 19" St.
LOT B SHORT PLAT 5761 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9111010087; BEING THE EAST 92.00
FEET OF THE WEST 184.00 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER
PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5, OF PLATS, ON PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATA POINT 332.00 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1;
THENCE EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1;
THENCE SOUTH, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID TRACT 1, TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
Exhibit 4
Parcel 14
3787-000-001-0606 — 3173 19" St.
LOT C SHORT PLAT 5761 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9111010087; BEING THAT PORTION
OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5, OF PLATS, ON PAGE 1,
RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 322.00 FEET EAST OF
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE SOUTH, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE
WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 1, TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH OF THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE WEST 184.00 FEET AND EXCEPT
THE NORTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 15
152401-1-191-2007 — No Site Address
TH PTN NW1/4 NE1/4 DESC FOR TAX PURP ONLY AS FOLS, BAAP BEARING SO*16152W 232.46FT FR N1/4
COR OF SEC 15 TH SO*16' 52W 100.45FT TH S89*50'59E 339.97FT TH NLY 166.45FT TH N89*50'46W
339.97FT TH S TO POB EXC E 122.90FT THOF & EXC W 30FT OF N 66FT THOF
Parcel 16
152401-1-186-2004 — 1737 Corbet Dr NW
THE EAST 122.90 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT BEARING SOUTH 0*16'52" WEST 166.46 FEET FROM
THE NORTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 0*16'52" WEST 166.45 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89*50'59" EAST 339.975 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 166.45 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A
POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39*50'46" EAST FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
89*50'46" WEST 339.975 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
Parcel 17
152401-1-187-2003 — 1747 Corbet Dr NW
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP
24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., I KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0*16'52 WEST 166.46
FEET AND SOUTH 89*50'46 EAST 679.97 FEET FROM QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 10
AND 15; THENCE NORTH 89*50'46 WEST 340 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0*16'52 WEST 60 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 89*50'46 EAST TO CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID
CENTERLINE 60 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT EASTERLY 200 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH
AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER AND ACROSS THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE
FOLLOWING TRACT: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER,
SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE OF CORBET DRIVE WHICH BEARS SOUTH
0*16'52 WEST 166.46 FEET AND SOUTH 89*50'46 EAST 679.97 FEET FROM QUARTER SECTION CORNER
BETWEEN SECTIONS 10 AND 15; THENCE ALONG CENTERLINE OF SAID CORBET DRIVE, SOUTH 60 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89*50'46 WEST 340 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0*16'52
WEST 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89*50'46' EAST 340 FEET TO CENTERLINE OF CORBET DRIVE;
THENCE NORTH LONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CORBET DRIVE 106.45 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; EXCEPT CORBET DRIVE ON THE EAST SIDE THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 130 FEET
THEREOF. SUBJECT TO: RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED MARCH 26, 1956,
UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 63066.
Exhibit 4
Parcel 18
152401-1-190-2008 — 1741 Corbet Dr NW
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP
24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE
WESTERLY 140 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE OF
COUNTY ROAD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0*16'52" WEST 166.46 FEET AND SOUTH 89*50'46" EAST 679.97
FEET FROM QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 10 AND 15; THENCE ALONG CENTERLINE
OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SOUTH 60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89*50'46" WEST
340 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0*16'52" WEST 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89*50'46" EAST 340 FEET TO
CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD 106.45
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
Parcel 19
152401-1-188-2002 — 1745 Corbet Dr NW
PT OF NW1/4 NE1/4 BAAP ON CEN LN OF CO RD WH BEARS S 0*16'52" W 166.46FT & S 89*50'46" E
679.97FT W FROM THE 1/4 SEC COR BET SEC 10 & 15 TH N 89*50'46" W 200FT TH S 0*16'52" W 60FT
TH S 89*50'46 E 200FT TO CEN LN OF CO RD TH NLY ALG SD CEN LN 60FT TO POB EX THEREFROM CO RD
ALG E LN TF
Parcel 20
152401-1-189-2001— 1743 Corbet Dr NW
PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF
COUNTY ROAD WHICH BEARS SO*16'52 W 166.46 FEET AND S89*50'46 E 679.97 FEET, MORE OR LESS,
FROM QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 10 AND 15, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE
ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SOUTH 60 FEET TO TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE N89*50'46 W 340 FEET; THENCE SO*16'52 W 106.45 FEET; THENCE S89*50'46 E 340 FEET TO
CENTERLINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, 106.45 FEET TO
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT WEST 140 FEET AND EXCEPT PORTION FOR ROAD ON EAST SIDE.
SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 21
3787-000-002-0100 —1736 Corbet Dr NW
(LOT A SHORT PLAT NO 6066 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR FILE NO 9207290235, VOLUME 8, PAGE 109)
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 2, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF
PLATS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF
CONVEYED TO KITSAP COUNTY BY DEED BEARING AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 948367; SITUATE IN KITSAP
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 22
3787-000-002-0209 — No Site Address
LOT B SHORT PLAT NO. 6066 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9207290235; BEING A PORTION OF
TRACT 2, PHINNEY 2-1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1,
RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO
KITSAP COUNTY BY DEED BEARING AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 948367. PARCEL II: AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS,
EGRESS, AND UTILITIES OVER A PORTION OF THE NORTH 40 FEET OF LOT D OF SHORT PLAT NO. 6066
RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9207290235. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Exhibit 4
Parcel 23
3787-000-003-0505 —1748 Corbet Dr NW
RESULTANT PARCEL B OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO.
3070943, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT C SHORT PLAT NO 6066 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR FILE
NO 9207290235, VOLUME 8, PAGE 109, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; >>ALSO THE EAST
200.00 FEET OF THE WEST 350.00 FEET OF LOT 3, PHINNEY 2-1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS RECORDED IN
VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 24
3787-000-002-0407 — 1752 Corbet Dr NW
(LOT D SHORT PLAT NO 6066 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR FILE NO 9207290235, VOLUME 8, PAGE 109)
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 2, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF
PLATS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF
CONVEYED TO KITSAP COUNTY BY DEED BEARING AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 948367; SITUATE IN KITSAP
COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 25
152401-1-193-2005 — No Site Address
THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE WEST 5 FEET TO
KITSAP COUNTY; EXCEPT THE WEST HALF AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 900 PAGE 227 OF DEEDS.
Parcel 26
3787-000-003-0208 —1722 Corbet Dr NW
THE WEST 150 FEET OF LOT 3, PHINNEY 2-1/2 ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN
VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 65 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KITSAP COUNTY FOR CORBET DRIVE BY DEED
RECORDED MARCH 18, 1969, UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 949109.
Parcel 27
3787-000-003-0109 —1710 Corbet Dr NW
A PORITON OF LOT 3, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS,
PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF CORBET DRIVE, 65 FEET; THENCE
EASTERLY 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 FEET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF LOT 3; THENCE WEST 150
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 28
3787-000-003-0901— No Site Address
RESULTANT PARCEL A OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO.
200805060002, AND AS CORRECTED BY AFFIDAVIT OF MINOR CORRECTION RECORDED UNDER
AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200805090057 AND 200806020156, AND AS DEPICTED ON SURVEY RECORDED
UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200806020157, IN VOLUME 70 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 212, BEING A RE-
RECORDING OF AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200805060001, IN VOLUME 70 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 183, RECORDS
OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 10, C. JACK JONES ADDITION,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY,
WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF RESULTANT PARCEL A OF THE BOUNDARY LINE
Exhibit 4
ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 3070943, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, C. JACKJONES
ADDITION; THENCE NORTH 24*17'25" WEST 184.99 FEET, AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY
RECORDED UNDER KITSAP COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200805060001, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 3,
PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1
AND THE TERMINATION OF THIS LINE; SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
SUBJECT TO A 25 FOOT WIDE ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE EAST
25 FEET OF SAID LOT 10, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, THE WEST LINE OF SAID 25 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT
SHALL BE LENGTHENED ACCORDINGLY TO INTERSECT THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF RESULTANT PARCEL
B OF THIS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT.
Parcel 29
3787-000-003-1008 — 3014 17" St.
RESULTANT PARCEL 1 OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO.
200903300137, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: RESULTANT
PARCEL B OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200805060002,
AND AS CORRECTED BY AFFIDAVIT OF MINOR CORRECTION RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS.
200805090057 AND 200806020156, AND AS DEPICTED ON SURVEY RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE
NO. 200806020157, IN VOLUME 70 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 212, BEING A RE-RECORDING OF AUDITOR'S FILE
NO. 200805060001, IN VOLUME 70 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 183, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THE
NORTH 32 FEET OF LOT 11, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF
PLATS, PAGE 50, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 30
3759-000-001-0006 —1706 Corbet Dr NW
LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS
OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 31
3759-000-004-0003 — 320817t" St.
LOT 4 AND THE WEST 25 FEET OF LOT 5, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6
OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 32
3759-000-005-0002 — No Site Address
LOT 6 AND THE EAST ONE-HALF OF LOT 5 OF C. JACK JONES ADDITON, RECORDED IN VOLUME 6, PAGE
50 OF PLATS, KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 33
3759-000-007-0000 — 303017t" St.
BLK-000 LOT -007 D-00 ALL OF LOT 7 & W 25FT OF LOT 8
Parcel 34
3759-000-008-0009 — 302017t" St.
Exhibit 4
THE EAST 25 FEET OF LOT 8 AND ALL OF LOT 9, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN
VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
Parcel 35
3759-000-011-0004 — 3012 17" St.
RESULTANT PARCEL 2 OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO.
200903300137, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 11, C. JACK
JONES ADDITION, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF
KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 32 FEET THEREOF.
Parcel 36
152401-1-205-2001— 1539 Corbet Dr NW
THE EAST 350 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1
EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Parcel 37
152401-1-195-2003 — 1525 Corbet Dr NW
S1/2 N1/2 SW1/4 NW1/4 NE1/4 EXC W 1 AC
Parcel 38
152401-1-200-2006 — 1523 Corbet Dr NW
N1/2 N1/2 S1/2 SW1/4 NW1/4 NE1/4 EX RD EX W1/2
Parcel 39
152401-1-201-2005 — 1517 Corbet Dr NW
RESULTANT PARCEL C OF BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO.
201512110075, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST
158.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT CORBET DRIVE.
Parcel 40
152401-1-201-2005 — No site address
THE SOUTH 165 FEET OF TRACTS 12 AND 13 AND THE EAST 32.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 165 FEET OF
TRACT 14 PHINNEY BAY WATERFRONT TRACTS, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 OF
PLATS ON PAGE 17, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF IN THE EAST ONE-
HALF OF TRACT 12, SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
Exhibit 5
City of Bremerton
Area Proposed for Annexation
Pre -Land Use Designation Map
LK4
40
5
6 7 8 9 10 11 1 12 13 1i
17 19
15 16
1 s 1 22 24
rn os d for
A nLwx tion 29
20 27 28
30 31 32 33 34
36
37
38
39
N
i
Legend '
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Proposed Territory for Annexation
City Limits
Urban Growth Area (U GA)
Fiscal Impacts of Annexation:
Corbet Annexation
March 2017
A
Table of Contents
Project Overview .....................................................
Potential Annexation Aerial .....................................
StudyArea...............................................................
Growth Planning Status ...........................................
Report Structure.......................................................
General Annexation Discussion: ...............................
Rocky Point Urban Growth Area ..............................
Annexation Method — Petition Method ...................
Request for Annexation &
Outside Utility Agreements .........................
Fiscal Impacts — City Perspective ..............................
Cost and Benefits —
Rocky Point Resident Perspective ................
Community Character of the Proposed Annexation
LandUse...................................................................
Housing and Population ...........................................
Assessed Valuation ...................................................
Public / Open Space .................................................
Schools.....................................................................
Infrastructure Overview ...........................................
PotableWater..........................................................
Sanitary Sewer..........................................................
Stormwater Infrastructure ........................................
Streets and Transportation .......................................
Attachment A: Staff Proposed Study Area ...............
Attachment B: Growth Assumptions .......................
Attachment C: Fiscal Impacts of
West Bremerton & Gorst UGA Annexation.
Attachment D: Rocky Point Public Handout............
Attachment E: Water & Sewer Map ........................
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
2
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
7
.. 8
.. 9
.. 9
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
March 6, 2017
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
Project Overview
This report was prepared for City Council Review in advance of the March 15, 2017 City Council
meeting with annexation petitioners. The City has been asked to consider annexing a portion of
the Rocky Point Urban Growth Area (UGA).
This process began on January 23, 2017 when the City Clerk received a Petition to Annex from a
single property owner pursuant to RCW 35.13.125 (see image below for the Petitioner's Parcel).
This property proposed for annexation is adjacent to the City of Bremerton current limits. In
addition to the single property owner petition, over recent years the City has extended utility
services to nearby parcels and in trade for this, they signed "Outside Utility Agreements"
(OUAs). This means that in exchange for extending a public utility to a person's property (eg.
water or sewer service) an agreement was signed stating that the owner of the property would
not oppose a future annexation. The Corbet Annexation has been configured by Staff as shown
on the following page based on the petitioner request and the City's OUAs.
March 6, 2017
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
Study Area
The map on the previous page identifies the subject area that the City is considering for
annexation. The general boundaries of the study area are adjacent to Corbet Drive near 151H
17th and 191h Streets and this area is adjacent to current city limits.
As an overview, this area is a relatively developed neighborhood of single family homes. There
are some larger lots within the area that are undeveloped or have a single family home on a
large lot that may choose to subdivide their property in the future.
Growth Planning Status
This Corbet Annexation is entirely within the City of Bremerton associated Rocky Point UGA and
is contiguous to the City. This UGA it may be annexed at any time by Bremerton without
challenge or dispute from other jurisdictions. The City's 2016 Comprehensive Plan anticipated
annexing this area during the 20 -year time horizon of the Plan.
Report Structure
The purpose of this report is to summarize the following:
• Area proposed for annexation (Attachment A)
• Growth assumptions (Attachment B)
• Fiscal impacts of annexation (Attachment C)
• Share public information relevant to Rocky Point (Attachment D)
• Vicinity of City infrastructure (Attachment E)
Attachment A: A map of potential annexation.
Attachment B: As the City annexes territory, the City must consider both the existing population
and the buildout potential. This attachment contains the figures for a 'baseline' year of 2017,
and a'buildout' year of 2037. The data in this section are used for assessed value and future
population growth.
Attachment C: Fiscal Impacts of West Bremerton UGA and Gorst UGA Annexation. This
attachment addresses the fiscal impacts of all West Bremerton UGAs: Navy Yard City, West Hills,
Gorst and Rocky Point. City Council should consider the impacts to annexations comprehensively
and in totality. This attachment provides the insight for City Council to determine the short and
long-term impacts of annexing all the West Bremerton UGAs. The reader should understand
that the proposed Corbet Annexation is only a small portion of this much more comprehensive
look at annexation.
Attachment D: "Rocky Point, What If We Became Part of Bremerton" (also referred to as the
Rocky Point Handout). This document contains public information regarding annexation benefits
and impacts to a property owner.
Attachment E: Vicinity Map of the sewer and water mains to assist the reader understanding
where the capital infrastructure is located.
March 6, 2017
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
General Annexation Discussion:
Rocky Point Urban Growth Area
An important consideration is how the Corbet Annexation relates to the remaining portion of
the Rocky Point Urban Growth Area. As of this time, the City is promoting annexations but is not
the initiating party for annexation. The City is seeking interested owners within UGAs to request
annexation. In Spring 2017, Staff will be proceeding with educational outreach processes to each
UGA to assist the public with any annexation questions and gauge public interest in annexations.
The Corbet proposal is to annex a small portion of the Rocky Point UGA; the remaining peninsula
of UGA is not be proposed for annexation at this time. Please also note that Kitsap County is not
supportive of annexations that create or further enhance more 'island' or 'peninsula' and would
like to see Bremerton annex the Rocky Point UGA as it is surrounded by City of Bremerton limits.
The proposed annexation of a portion of the Rocky Point UGA does not further create more
'islands' or 'peninsulas' and actually reduces the existing 'peninsula' UGA size, thus reducing the
impact to Kitsap County.
Annexation Method — Petition Method
There are nine methods of annexation pursuant to state law, and the Corbet Annexation utilizes
the "petition method." The petition method of annexation is accomplished with two steps:
• Step 1— "10% Petition" (or initiating petition)
• Step 2 — "60% Petition" (finalizing petition)
The percentages refer to the law's requirement that the signatures on the petitions must
represent the requisite percentage of either assessed value or acreage of land. One of the
primary purposes of the two step process is first for the City Council to meet with the initiating
petitioners and determine if the City will accept, reject, or modify the proposed
annexation. Once the City Council sets the geographical boundaries for the annexations
signatures are gathered for the finalizing petition (60%). The first step is the only time that the
City Council may make modifications to the area that is proposed for annexation. The City must
ensure that annexations have logical boundaries.
The Corbet Annexation is at step 1 of the petition process, and the City Council will be meeting
with petitioners on March 15, 2017. Following this meeting, the Council will decide to accept,
reject, or modify the annexation. City staff has done some preliminary work for City Council's
consideration to establish a logical boundary for this proposed annexation; this will be a
modification from the original annexation petition that was received. The boundaries that City
staff have proposed for the Corbet Annexation are described in more detail in the next section.
March 6, 2017
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
Request for Annexation & Outside Utility Agreements
The City received a petition to annex on January 23, 2017. Upon receipt of that request to
annex, Staff reviewed City records to find OUAs in close proximity to the property requesting
annexation. Staff strategically utilized a portion of the existing OUAs to enlarge the annexation
geography to the greatest extent feasible while designing a logical City limit boundary.
OUA documents previously executed between the City and property owners state that in
exchange for the extension of a public utility to a property (eg. water or sewer service) the
owner of that property agrees to support a future annexation. The OUA is a legal document that
runs with the land, and is on file with the City of Bremerton and the Kitsap County recording
office. Bremerton's OUAs include a limited power of attorney clause. Previous legal precedent
confirms that OUAs may be substituted as a signature on annexation petitions by the owner of
the property, even if the current owner is different than those who signed the agreement. Staff
believes that the proposed annexation geography makes the most effective use of
concentrations of OUAs.
March 6, 2017
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
Fiscal Impacts — City Perspective
The City Council desires to move forward with annexation for all the UGAs. Before undertaking
any annexation, the City must consider the 20 -year vision of annexation, including fiscal impacts.
The City of Bremerton has developed a Fiscal Impacts of West Bremerton UGA and Gorst UGA
Annexation' which can be seen in Attachment C. The current petition for annexation is to bring
only a small portion of the West Bremerton UGAs into the City's jurisdiction. The total acreage
of the West Bremerton UGA is 1,530 AC. The Corbet Annexation, as configured by Staff, is 23.6
AC (1.5% of the West Bremerton UGAs).
The table below is an excerpt from Attachment C (page 11). This has been provided for the
reader to see the total West Bremerton UGA's fiscal impacts for 2017, 2020, and 2032.
Estimated Long Term Net Fiscal Impact of Annexation
This report has assumed that 1.5% of the total impacts identified in the table above can be
attributed to the Corbet Annexation. Here are the calculations to show the proportionate share
of the total West Bremerton UGA cost/benefits:
Net Resources
($2,895) 1 $8,040 1 $3,840
1 As the Fiscal Impacts of West Bremerton UGA and Gorst UGA Annexation was completed in 2015, the data used for
this report was the 2014 and 2015 budget and documents. However, after reviewing the 2016 and 2017 budgets,
Staff has determined that there were no considerable structural changes between these budgets. For this reason, the
City would not expect significant differences in planning -level results of the study and is comfortable with continuing
to use this data as a basis for this analysis. City financial Staff confirmed the reasonableness of this assumption.
March 6, 2017
2017
2020
2032
Core Expenditures
2,408,000
3,179,000
6,080,000
Core Revenues
2,215,000
3,715,000
6,336,000
FTEs from Annexation
13.5
15.0
18.9
Net Resources (000"s)
193,000
536,000
256,000
-8%
17%
4%
Qefidt Sur lus as %of Expenditures
This report has assumed that 1.5% of the total impacts identified in the table above can be
attributed to the Corbet Annexation. Here are the calculations to show the proportionate share
of the total West Bremerton UGA cost/benefits:
Net Resources
($2,895) 1 $8,040 1 $3,840
1 As the Fiscal Impacts of West Bremerton UGA and Gorst UGA Annexation was completed in 2015, the data used for
this report was the 2014 and 2015 budget and documents. However, after reviewing the 2016 and 2017 budgets,
Staff has determined that there were no considerable structural changes between these budgets. For this reason, the
City would not expect significant differences in planning -level results of the study and is comfortable with continuing
to use this data as a basis for this analysis. City financial Staff confirmed the reasonableness of this assumption.
March 6, 2017
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
Cost and Benefits — Rocky Point Resident Perspective
An informational handout has been created to help the residents identify the impacts of
annexations. This handout was developed utilizing information from the Fiscal Impacts of West
Bremerton UGA and Gorst UGA Annexation. This handout has been included as Attachment D.
Attachment D is based on three categories of cost that a property owner may be impacted by.
Those include the following:
(1) Property taxes;
(2) Utility Services cost, fees and taxes; and
(3) Transportation Benefit District (car tabs).
Property Taxes: Property Tax rates between the City and County area is less than 3% difference.
Part of property taxes include any capital bonds or levies. In 2015, the City of Bremerton voters
passed the Fire capital bond by 71.1%. This bond will generate $4.5M for fire engines, a ladder
truck, two ambulances and other vehicle and firefighting equipment. It also will remodel two
fire stations to outfit them with fire sprinklers and create specialized facilities for both men and
women. Property taxes increase by 22 cents per thousand dollars of assessed property values.
Upon annexation the recommendation is for this Fire capital bond to be extended the annexed
territory.
Utility Service Cost: Most residents already using City water and sewer utilities will cease to pay
out -of -city surcharges, so they will see some savings. Other differences include: the City shows
storm water utility charges as a separate line item on the utility bill whereas the County includes
it in taxes; and the City requires garbage collection service while the County does not.
Transportation Benefit District: Transportation Benefit District (TBD) is used to improve and
repair existing streets. The fee enacted by the TBD is commonly referred to as "Car Tab Fees."
Kitsap County does not have a TBD, and the City does. The handout has assumed each
household has two cars, thus an additional fee of $40 per year if annexed.
Summary of Cost: Attachment D shows that an average assessed property value of $240,000
could expect to pay an additional cost of $143 a year, or less than $12 a month.
March 6, 2017
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
Community Character of the Proposed Annexation
The following documents the overall character and existing conditions in the proposed area.
The area is approximately 23.6 acres and is predominantly developed with single family
homes. An important part of the annexation process is to establish an adopted City
Comprehensive Plan land use for the territory that will be annexed. The following describes
what the City has done to prepare that land use designation.
As illustrated in the map below, Kitsap County's Comprehensive Plan has designated the area
with two land uses:
• Urban Medium and High Density Residential (UMHDR)
• Urban Low Density Residential (ULDR)
During the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update (2016 Plan) the City anticipated that our UGA's
would annex during the 20 -year plan horizon, and in this adopted plan the City predesignated all
land uses within our UGAs. The City believed that by pre -designating the land use with the
"Equivalence Table" it would facilitate the smooth transition of jurisdiction from Kitsap County
to the City and individuals would be fully informed about what land use designation they would
receive after annexation.
Pursuant to the City's adopted 2016 Plan, after annexation the future land use designations will
be as follows:
• Kitsap County UMHDR will become City of Bremerton equivalent "Multifamily
Residential" (MR)
• Kitsap County ULDR will become City of Bremerton equivalent "Low Density Residential"
(LDR)
March 6, 2017
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
Housing and Population
The City and County Department of Community Development have witnessed increased
development pressure within the region. As for this area, most of the undeveloped area
(approximately 6 acres) may contain some wetland features and moderate geological hazardous
area (slopes) that make development more challenging, but the strength of the housing market
is making these areas viable for development. In total, the estimated existing population of the
study area is 69 people and at full buildout, the City could expect 156 people.
Assessed Valuation
The total assessed valuation of land and structures in the area in 2017 is $6.2M. As shown in
Attachment B, the total assessed value of existing buildings is $4.8M, and the total assessed
value of the land is $1.5M.
Public / Open Space
Within a short distance from the potential annexation area, there is an existing City
Neighborhood Park: Haddon Park (picture to the right). This park was established in 1987 and is
about 3.09 acres. This park includes a play area, perimeter pathway, restrooms and open lawn.
It is well -used and provides passive and active recreation opportunities.
Schools
School district boundaries are typically a major concern for residents. Municipal annexations do
not modify school district boundaries.
March 6, 2017
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
Infrastructure Overview
Attachment E is a map that shows the City of Bremerton installed infrastructure, including water
and sewer mains. The following is information regarding the potential annexation and its
infrastructure.
Potable Water
The potential annexation area is serviced by City of Bremerton water infrastructure. A water
main runs through the potential annexation area. Little or no additional public investment
would be required to service this area with water. As development occurs within this area with
subdivisions, private developers will be responsible for extending the water system for their
projects.
Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary Sewer service is available for the potential annexation area. As development occurs
within this area with subdivisions, private developers will be responsible for extending the
collection system for their projects.
Stormwater Infrastructure
Most streets in the vicinity have not
been developed with integrated curb
and gutter systems. Future public
investment would be required to
bring the Stormwater system up to
the City of Bremerton standards in
future years.
Streets and Transportation
The existing network of streets in the
study area is operating well within
City of Bremerton service capacity levels. Corbet Drive is the key arterial street running through
the study area and this road has further capacity for services. As development occurs within this
area with subdivisions or multifamily housing, private developers will be responsible for
contributing to any necessary transportation improvements
March 6, 2017
Attachment A
City of Bremerton
Area Proposed for
Annexation
10% Petition
March 2017
1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1 10
15 16 18 20 21 22 sed for
ion
26
23 . -----
29
25 27 28
30 31 32 33 34
37
38
39
Legend
Proposed Territory for Annexation
Initial Petitioner
Outside Utility Agreement (OUA)
City Limits
Urban Growth Area (UGA)
Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis
Attachment 6: Growth Assumptions
Corbet Annexation
Feb 2017 Existina & Proiected Buildout Data
Existing Conditions (2017)
i
Units Single Family 1 30 1 68
Projected Buildout (2037)
Units Multi Family 1 0 10
Commercial GSF 0 0
Number Operating
0
0
Businesses
Estimated Total
69
156
Population
39
68
Total Parcels (Lots)
---------------
Lots Sewered
13
51
Lots City Water
18
68
Total Acres (Taxable
20
20
Property)
Total
6 2
Undeveloped/Open
Acreage
Total Assessed
$4,822,860 $13,866,860
Value Buildings
_
Total Assessed
$1,457,180 $1,457,180
Value Land
Total Assessed
$6,280,040 $15,324,040
Value
Assumptions / Sources
1. Kitsap County Assessor Records
checked against aerial photo for unit counts.
2. 2.3 persons/household assumed.
Figure suggested for use by OFM for Kitsap.
3. Gross Density of 6 DU /Acre assumed for remainder infill development lots.
4. All future buildout lots assumed to have water and sewer.
5. Average 2016 assessed value of single
family home is applied to all units at buildout.
6. All dollar figures in 2017 dollars.
March 6, 2017
Attachment C
CITY OF BREMERTON
FISCAL IMPACTS OF WEST BREMERTON
UGA AND GORST UGA ANNEXATION
FINAL: AUGUST 5, 2015
Attachment C
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................1
1.1 Study Purpose.......................................................................................................1
1.2 Study Area Description.........................................................................................1
1.3 Document Organization........................................................................................ 2
1.4 Approach and Methodology.................................................................................. 3
1.5 Data Sources.......................................................................................................... 4
2.0 ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................................6
2.1 General Assumptions............................................................................................ 6
2.2 Development Assumptions................................................................................... 6
3.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS.......................................................................8
3.1 Baseline Budget Assumptions (No Annexation) ................................................. 8
3.2 Annexation is Estimated to Provide a Net Fiscal Benefit to the City ................. 9
4.0 SHORT-TERM ANNEXATION IMPACTS.......................................................10
4.1 Short-term Operating Revenue Impacts............................................................10
4.2 Short -Term Operating Cost Impacts..................................................................14
4.3 Short -Term Capital Impacts................................................................................17
5.0 LONG-TERM ANNEXATION IMPACTS.........................................................21
5.1 Long -Term Operating Impacts............................................................................
21
5.2 Long -Term Capital Impacts.................................................................................
21
APPENDIX A: GORST PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE LAND USE MAP .................27
061
Attachment C
1.1 STUDY PURPOSE
The City of Bremerton is considering annexation of the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst
Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), and this analysis was conducted to assist the City in assessing the fiscal
implications of such an annexation. In 2014 a separate analysis was completed evaluating potential
annexation of the Gorst UGA; this assessment differs from the 2014 analysis in that it combines the
impact of annexing all four areas at the same time. The purpose of the analysis is to give the City an
understanding of specific incremental fiscal impacts — costs and revenues — of such an annexation during
the first five years after annexation.
In addition, the City is interested in potential long-term fiscal impacts of annexation. This analysis
assesses high-level potential impacts over the next 20 years to identify long-term risks, opportunities,
and uncertainties the City of Bremerton should consider.
1.2 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION
In 2014, the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs had a population of approximately
4,900 residents and an estimated 630 jobs. The four Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) are shown in
Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1: Potential Annexation Areas Map
Urban Growth Areas for Analysis ■
August 2014
Rocky J,
i.
Point
i 6
I�
West
1
HIills
L
.
�Navy
-
-
� I
._
Yard
City
I
I
Gorst L - I' Cih� of &remehar
0 025 C 5 1 M I s i UO On Growth An
I ' J - I
I
Source: Kitsap County, 2014; BERK, 2015.
3
Attachment C
Navy Yard City UGA. The Navy Yard City is the largest of the four areas in terms of population and
employment, with approximately 2,600 residents and an estimated 370 jobs in 2014.
Rocky Point UGA. Rocky Point UGA is primarily residential, with a population of approximately 1,560
residents.
West Hills UGA. In 2014, West Hills UGA had a population of approximately 480 residents and an
estimated 15 jobs.
Gorst UGA. In 2010, the Gorst UGA had a population of 222 residents and an estimated 237 jobs. Under
the Preferred Alternative from the Gorst Subarea Plan developed in 2013, the UGA is planned to evolve
into a complete community with places to live, play, shop, and work in a waterfront setting. Mixed uses
would be allowed through much of the UGA. The waterfront area would allow lower intensity
commercial uses with smaller impervious footprints interspersed by trails, parks, and reclaimed
shoreline habitat. Under this alternative the UGA is assumed to add 1,060 people and 298 additional
jobs by 2035. For a map that shows the future zoning of Gorst under the Preferred Alternative, please
refer to Appendix A.
1.3 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION
This document includes the following sections:
• Assumptions
• Short -Term Impacts
• Long -Term Impacts
2.0 Study Approach. This section introduces the approach and methodology of this study, and provides
some additional background information in the purpose of the analysis.
3.0 Summary of Key Findings. This section presents the high-level findings around net fiscal impact of
the annexation.
4.0 Short -Term Annexation Impact. This section presents the detailed findings for operating costs and
revenues and capital costs and revenues for the first five years after annexation.
5.0 Long -Term Annexation Impacts. This section presents a high-level consideration of how the
annexation may impact the City over the next 20 years.
Appendix A. Gorst UGA Preferred Alternative Future Land Use Map.
Attachment C
1.4 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
This report presents planning -level operating cost and revenue estimates of annexing the Navy Yard
City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs into the City of Bremerton over the next five and twenty
years. The report also addresses capital impacts of annexation including capital facility needs and capital
revenue estimates.
High -Level Planning Document
It is important to note that this is a financial planning study and not a budget development exercise.
The analysis is intended to provide a reasonable estimate of potential costs and revenues associated
with annexation and to allow for the development and evaluation of alternative scenarios to test the
implications of development assumptions, policy choices, and alternative service delivery options, to
help the City determine how to proceed with the potential annexation of these areas.
If the City proceeds with annexation, this analysis provides a basis from which the City can begin the
process of planning for the higher service demands of a slightly larger city. However, the actual
implementation will be accomplished through the regular budget process wherein City management will
revisit the balance of costs and revenues in light of updated information and the overall needs of the
City at that time.
In addition, staffing projections used in this analysis are the best estimates given current information.
The City will need to determine exact staffing levels for each department if annexation becomes a
reality. There will likely be a transition phase as new staff are hired and trained, which can include
substantial lead time. The number of personnel needed and the timing of hiring by position will have to
be planned to a greater level of detail than was necessary for this planning -level analysis.
While this analysis provides a comprehensive look at the potential incremental impacts on the City's
financial picture, it does not provide a full accounting of the City's projected sources and uses of funds.
2014 Base Year Budget
BERK started this study in mid -2014, and due to timing, used the 2014 City of Bremerton budget as a
basis for building the baseline fiscal model. The preliminary draft results were submitted to City staff in
late 2014. The City has since finalized the 2015 budget; however, after reviewing both 2014 and 2015
budgets, BERK determined that there were no considerable structural changes between these budgets.
For this reason, BERK would not expect significant differences in planning -level results of the study and
is comfortable with continuing to use 2014 as a basis for the analysis. BERK also consulted with the City's
finance staff, who confirmed the reasonableness of this assumption.
Analysis Considers City With and Without Annexation
To be an effective decision support tool, the analysis cannot consider fiscal impacts by looking just at the
annexation areas alone, but instead must consider the potential impacts of annexation by comparing
the fiscal outlook for the City of Bremerton under two alternative futures: (1) the future of the current
City with boundaries unchanged and (2) the future of a larger version of the City that includes
annexation of the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs. Analysis of these two
alternative futures provides a truly comprehensive look at the potential implications of annexation on
long-term fiscal sustainability.
Land -Based Fiscal Model
BERK developed an annexation fiscal model to estimate revenues and expenses for both the existing City
and a post -annexation City. Taking the analysis into the future shows how the fiscal balance in the City
Attachment C
might change over time and how annexation might affect the long-term fiscal outlook for the new,
larger City.
Onaoina Costs and Revenues
The fiscal model estimates changes in the cost of services based on relationships between direct
services, such as maintenance workers or planners, and underlying demographic and community
changes, such as increases in population, housing units, commercial activity, and land area.
Costs are separately estimated for labor and non -labor categories:
• Labor costs are based on current salaries and benefits and an assumed annual escalation rate.
• Non -labor costs in each department are driven by the current relationships between the number of
Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) in that department and the magnitude of non -labor costs in that
department.
• Non -labor costs that are unrelated to the positions in a department (such as facilities maintenance,
which is related to the size of a building, or street lighting costs, which are related to lane miles) are
separated from the department costs and estimated based on relevant cost drivers.
• The analysis of operating impacts focuses solely on the general and street funds, as these are the
primary operating funds for the City. Enterprise funds, whose operations are generally self-supporting
through user fees, are not addressed as part of the operating impact analysis.
Capital Cost ana Kevenue
The capital impact analysis includes capital costs from all City departments, including the enterprise
funds, to capture all capital needs in the potential annexation areas. The capital revenue analysis
focuses on general capital revenues, primarily the Real Estate Excise Tax.
DATA SOURCES
Data used in this report came from the following sources:
• City of Bremerton
o City of Bremerton Budget, 2014
o Staffing detail, including position titles, FTEs, salary and benefit costs, 2014
o Bremerton Annexation of Gorst UGA Memo, 2014
o Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013
o Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement, 2013
o White Paper: Rocky Point Assumption Issues, 2014
o Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Capital Improvement Program Overview,
2014
o Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Water System Plan Update, 2012
o Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update,
2014
o Bremerton Parks Department, Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2014
• Kitsap County
o Kitsap County Assessor, Parcel data, 2014
o Kitsap County, Buildable lands data, 2014
Attachment C
o Kitsap County Assessor, Personal property tax revenue, 2012
o Kitsap County GIS, Parcel and street layer, 2014
o Kitsap County, UGA Sizing & Composition Remand Final Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2012
o Kitsap County Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2012
o Kitsap County Public Works, Navy Yard City Sewer CFP 2015-2020, 2014
o Kitsap County Public Works, Sewer Utility Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019
o Kitsap County Public Works, Solid Waste Division Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019
o Kitsap County Public Works, Surface and Stormwater Plan Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-
2019
o Kitsap County Public Works, Transportation Six -Year Improvement Program 2015-2020
• Puget Sound Regional Council
o 2014 employment
• Washington State Department of Revenue
o 2013 taxable retail sales
• Washington State Office of Financial Management
0 2014 population
0 2014 housing units
7
Attachment C
2.1 GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
General Assumptions
The analysis assumes that the City of Bremerton annexes the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills,
and Gorst UGAs into the City in 2016. The analysis assumes annexation related costs and revenues
accrue on an annual basis beginning in 2016.
All analysis presented in this document is based on annual estimates. Actual impacts from annexation in
any specific year will depend on the effective date of the annexation. Impacts in this document should
be considered planning -level estimates for the City to understand the direction and magnitude of likely
impacts.
Escalation Assumptions. The analysis assumes a general inflation rate of 3.0% annually. Staff salaries are
escalated at 2.0% annually. Benefits are assumed to grow at 6.5% per year in most years, with the
following exception: benefits are assumed to jump by 15% in 2018 due to Affordable Care Act
implementation rules regarding health plans.
DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
The analysis is built on the premise that key factors in the land base (such as population, employment,
and commercial activity) drive both demand for services and changes in the City's tax base. Demand for
services drives costs in the model, and depends on a jurisdiction's scope of services and choices
regarding level of service. The tax base drives revenues and will vary based on a jurisdiction's choices
regarding fiscal and taxing policy (limited by tax laws).
The BERK fiscal analysis framework is flexible and allows for varying assumptions about anticipated
development in the City and annexation areas over time, and how these changes affect the underlying
local tax base. In particular, the following elements are explicitly specified: (1) development assumptions
including type, scale, and timing of new development; (2) type and mix of tenants, associated
employment, and business income levels; (3) housing mix (single-family and multi -family) and density;
and (4) productivity of new retail activity.
Development assumptions within the City of Bremerton's current boundaries assume a level of
development activity similar to that seen historically. Development assumptions for the potential
annexation areas are described below.
Exhibit 2 summarizes the population and employment projections that underlie the cost and revenue
estimates in this study. The first column shows the current estimated housing units, population, and
employment within the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs. The subsequent
columns show the estimated housing units, population, and employment in the UGA boundaries over
time.
Attachment C
Exhibit 2. Development Metrics for Potential Annexation Areas (2014-2031)
2014 2016 2021 2026 2031 AAGR 2014-2031
Navy Yard City
Housing Units 1,332 1,365 1,447 1,529 1,611 1%
Population 2,613 2,727 2,916 3,105 3,294 1%
Est. Employment 374 435 597 776 974 6%
Rocky Point o000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000O\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Hous ingUnits 734 764 839 915 990 2%
Population 1,557 1,664 1,843 2,022 2,201 2%
Est. Employment 2 2 2 2 2
West Hills Island
Housing Units 209 230 282 334 387 4%
Population 480 554 679 803 927 4%
Est. Employment 15 15 15 15 15
Gorst��
Housing Units 106 107 141 268 520 10%
Population 222 234 311 573 1,040 10%
Est. Employment 237 237 275 342 428 4%
Total All Potential Annexation Areas
Housing Units 2,381 2,466 2,710 3,046 3,508 2%
Population 4,872 5,179 5,748 6,503 7,462 3%
Est. Employment 628 689 889 1,135 1,419 5%
Source: Kitsap County, 2014; BERK, 2015.
Gorst. These development assumptions are based on the adopted Preferred Alternative in the 2013
Gorst Subarea Plan, which designated long-term growth targets for 2035. Interim years are interpolated
based on conversations with planners and City staff, and give a conceptual representation of the pace at
which the UGA may develop to reach its long-term targets.
• Immediately upon annexation in 2016, the City of Bremerton will add to its boundaries the 107
housing units, 234 residents, and approximately 237 jobs in the Gorst UGA.
• By 2021, it's estimated that the Gorst area will have grown to include approximately 141 housing
units, 311 residents, and approximately 275 jobs. All of this activity would be located within the new
boundaries of the City of Bremerton.
• Based on the Gorst Subarea Plan, this fiscal analysis assumes that Gorst will grow to approximately
520 housing units, 1,040 residents, and approximately 428 jobs by 2031.
Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, and West Hills. Since a detailed subarea plan has not been developed for
these subareas, development assumptions for this model were based on assuming similar build -out
rates for these PAAs as for the Gorst subarea. Therefore, of the available capacity in each subarea, the
same percentage of available residential and commercial capacity was assumed to be built out by 2035
in all four subareas. The driving assumption was the implicit build -out percentage from the Gorst
Subarea Plan Preferred Alternative.
Attachment C
This section provides a brief overview of the key findings of how annexation of the Navy Yard City, Rocky
Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs will impact the City of Bremerton, based on the conceptual
development assumptions identified above. This section quantifies the impacts for both operating costs
and revenues as the City transitions through the annexation.
• Short-term impacts, defined as 2016-2020, are explained in more detail in Section 4.0.
• Longer-term impacts of annexation (after 2020) are described in Section 5.0.
3.1 BASELINE 3UDGET ASSUMPTIONS (NO ANNEXATION)
While all cities across the state are different in terms of tax bases, mixes of commercial and residential
land uses, and fiscal policies, almost all cities face structural challenges in local government funding that
have led to the cost of municipal services growing at faster rates than tax and fee revenues. This creates
an ongoing budget challenge for cities to maintain adequate levels of service without changing tax and
fee policies. The most significant contributors to this underlying structural challenge have been the
result of two voter approved initiatives:
1. Initiative 695, which was passed by voters in 1999, reduced Motor Vehicle Excise Tax rates to a flat
$30 fee. A portion of these revenues were used to support sales tax equalization payments that
were a significant funding source for many cities with lower than average sales tax collections.
2. Initiative 747 (and subsequent legislative action to restore the provisions of the Initiative after it was
declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in November 2007) limits growth in property taxes
to 1% per year, without voter approval. The effect of this change was to reduce the rate of growth in
property tax revenues, which is one of the three most important sources of local government
funding, to a rate that, in most cases, is lower than general inflation. The 1% limit does not apply to
the value of new construction.
As a result, a projection of revenues and costs that assumes no change in current policies (tax or level -
of -service) suggests the City of Bremerton can expect to face budget deficits in the coming years. This
finding is consistent with the common fiscal challenge in most other cities in Washington State and is
principally related to the impact of rising costs of doing business and additional staffing related to in -city
growth needed to maintain existing levels of service.
Since a city cannot operate with a budget deficit, the Bremerton City Council will make choices each
budget cycle to bring cost and revenue growth into alignment and maintain a balanced budget every
year. When analyzing annexation, it is important to consider that the way in which the City chooses to
address any baseline operating deficits may change the potential impacts of annexation. For example, if
the City were to consider raising business or residential taxes to close the gap, the different tax rates
would change revenues expected from the annexation areas based on the individual land base in those
areas. If the approach were to reduce costs by modifying levels of service, then these revised levels of
service would reduce costs associated with annexation in different proportions, again based on the land
base and the corresponding demand for services.
It is not possible to know what the City of Bremerton's future Councils may choose to do to balance
future budgets, and the City does not need to make those decisions at this time. Since the goal of this
annexation study is to evaluate the incremental fiscal impacts of a potential annexation, it analyzes a
itt
Attachment C
scenario which assumes continuing current policies. This results in a long-term outlook that shows
increasing budget deficits. These long-term deficits represent the structural imbalance between
municipal cost and revenue growth rates. In reality, the City will balance its budget in any given year.
ANNEXATION IS ESTIMATED TO PROVIDE A NET FISCAL BENEFIT
TO THE CITY
The key finding of this analysis is that the annexation of the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills,
and Gorst UGAs will have a slight negative impact in the short-term to the City of Bremerton, and a
moderate annual benefit in the medium- to long-term. A high-level picture of this finding is shown in
Exhibit 3.
Exhibit 3
Estimated Long Term Net Fiscal Impact of Annexation
Source: BERK, 2015.
Note: This Exhibit shows the City's future fiscal outlook if no changes were made to policies that impact costs and revenues.
In reality, the City Council will balance its budget each year. This table represents the impact that the Navy Yard City,
Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs would have under the City's current cost and revenue structures.
The Exhibit shows that in the near term there may be a slight negative impact, as the City may need to
hire some staff before the full revenue impacts of the UGA are realized. In addition, the near term
figures include impact of potential property tax and sales tax revenue sharing with Kitsap County
(approximately $785,000 in 2017; see Section 4.1 for more information).
The short-term and long-term impacts on revenues and costs are described in more detail in the
following sections. Specific decisions around long-term service decisions for police and fire services may
change the long-term impact.
i`l
2017
2020
2032
Core Expenditures
Core Revenues
FTEs from Annexation
Net Resources (000's)
Deficit/Surplus as %of Expenditures
2,408,000
2,215,000
13.5
3,179,000
3,715,000
15.0
6,080,000
6,336,000
18.9
(193,000)1
536,000
256,000
-8%
17%
4%
Source: BERK, 2015.
Note: This Exhibit shows the City's future fiscal outlook if no changes were made to policies that impact costs and revenues.
In reality, the City Council will balance its budget each year. This table represents the impact that the Navy Yard City,
Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs would have under the City's current cost and revenue structures.
The Exhibit shows that in the near term there may be a slight negative impact, as the City may need to
hire some staff before the full revenue impacts of the UGA are realized. In addition, the near term
figures include impact of potential property tax and sales tax revenue sharing with Kitsap County
(approximately $785,000 in 2017; see Section 4.1 for more information).
The short-term and long-term impacts on revenues and costs are described in more detail in the
following sections. Specific decisions around long-term service decisions for police and fire services may
change the long-term impact.
i`l
Attachment C
4.1 SHORT-TERM OPERATING REVENUE IMPACTS
Exhibit 4 shows short-term estimated revenues that would accrue to the City of Bremerton from
annexation of the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs), assuming annexation in 2016. All analysis
presented in this document is based on annual estimates. Actual impacts from annexation in any specific
year will depend on the effective date of the annexation. This analysis of operating impacts only
includes revenues for the General Fund and Street Fund.
Exhibit 4
Annual Annexation Revenue Impacts, 2016-2020 (Assuming 2016 Annexation Year)
Revenues not assuming any revenue sharing
Sales Tax
629,000
665,000
698,000
735,000
777,000
Criminal Justice Tax
60,000
63,000
66,000
68,000
72,000
Property Tax/Road Levy
0
1,088,000
1,128,000
1,168,000
1,209,000
Leasehold Excise Tax
0
0
0
0
0
UtiIityTaxes
296,000
312,000
330,000
347,000
368,000
Commercial Parking Tax
0
0
0
0
0
Gambling Tax
0
0
0
0
0
Solid Waste Franchise Fee
19,000
20,000
21,000
22,000
23,000
Building Permits and Fees
57,000
59,000
61,000
63,000
65,000
Business Licenses and Permits
11,000
12,000
13,000
14,000
15,000
EMS Levy
0
191,000
192,000
192,000
193,000
Liquor Board Profits and Excise Tax
52,000
54,000
56,000
59,000
61,000
Gas Tax
104,000
106,000
108,000
110,000
113,000
Planning and Plan Check Fees
23,000
24,000
24,000
25,000
26,000
Municipal Court Costs
61,000
63,000
65,000
67,000
69,000
Fines and Forfeits
134,000
140,000
147,000
153,000
161,000
Recreation Charges
(13,000)
(13,000)
(11,000)
(10,000)
(9,000)
Grants and Other Intergovernmental
108,000
113,000
119,000
124,000
129,000
Other Charges
29,000
31,000
32,000
33,000
35,000
B&O Tax
0
0
0
329,000
329,000
Police Services and Ambulance Transport Fees
68,000
71,000
74,000
76,000
79,000
Internal Charges for Service
0
0
0
0
0
Total
1,638,000
2,999,000
3,123,000
3,575,000
3,715,000
Potential Impacts of Revenue Sharing
Loss in Sales Tax Revenue
(472,000)
(333,000)
(174,000)
0
0
Loss in Property Tax Revenue
0
(451,000)
(312,000)
(161,000)
0
Total After Revenue Sharing
1,166,000
2,215,000
2,637,000
3,414,000
3,715,000
Source: City of Bremerton, 2014; and BERK, 2015.
Exhibit 4 provides two different pictures of the level of revenue the City may receive from annexation.
The top portion of the table shows the full level of revenue that would be generated by the PAAs. The
bottom portion of the table provides a picture of how revenues may accrue to the City if the City were
to sign a revenue sharing agreement with Kitsap County to mitigate the impacts of annexation on the
County's finances. Such an agreement would only be put in place if the interlocal method of annexation
were used.
iVA
Attachment C
Currently, the City is not subject to a revenue sharing agreement with Kitsap County. However, for the
purpose of providing a conservative fiscal analysis, the revenue estimates assume that the City may
choose to participate in revenue sharing.
The 2020 revenue impacts shown in Exhibit 4 reflect a stable picture of the PAAs going forward, given
the assumption that any potential revenue sharing agreements with Kitsap County would be completed
by 2020. In 2020, it's estimated that the City would receive approximately $3.7 million in revenue from
the annexation of these areas. This amount would grow going forward based on inflation as well as
increased development in the UGA as services are built out.
Operating Revenue Detail
This section describes the methodology used to estimate the primary revenue items described above.
Primary Rcvent- _Snrrrrcc
As with many cities in Washington State, the three largest revenue sources for the City of Bremerton are
Sales Tax, Property Tax, and Utility Taxes (including Payments In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT)), which make up
approximately 60% of the City's 2014 general and street fund operating revenues. Additionally, the City
levies a Business & Occupation (B&O) tax that is a significant revenue contributor, although the City is
working to reduce this source of revenue over time.
Sales Tax. Taxable retail sales are assumed to increase by 0.5% per year more than the general inflation
rate of 3.0% used in this analysis. If the City entered a revenue sharing agreement with Kitsap County to
offset the impact to the County of losing the UGA, this analysis assumes the City would receive 25% of
sales tax revenues generated in the UGA in 2016, 50% in 2017, 75% in 2018, and 100% of revenues
thereafter. Any actual revenue sharing agreement would be negotiated with the County and may vary
from these assumptions.
Property Tax. The property tax revenue (the amount that the City can collect) is limited to 1% or IPD
(Implicit Price Deflator), whichever is lower, above the previous year collections plus a levy on the value
of new construction. In future years, the base assessed value in the City and annexation areas is
expected to increase at a rate of 2% (0.5% below inflation). Additional assessed value will be added to
the area through residential and commercial development.
If the City entered a revenue sharing agreement with Kitsap County to mitigate the impacts of
annexation on the County's budget, this analysis assumes that property tax revenues would be shared
with the County using the same ratios as described above for sales tax. The timing of annexation will
impact when the City begins to collect the property tax levy from the PAAs. Collections would only begin
in 2017 if the City annexes the UGA early in 2016.
Utility Tax and PILOT. Utility taxes for telephone, gas, cable, electricity, and garbage are assumed to
grow based on the combination of population and employment in the PAAs. Current rates of these
utility revenues relative to population and employment in the City of Bremerton were applied to
assumed population and employment totals in the UGA to estimate utility revenues generated within
the UGA.
The City utility systems transfer Payments In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) to the General Fund. PILOT payments
include water, wastewater, and stormwater systems and are charged to the utility as a percentage of
the total revenue from all customers. These revenues are similar to utility taxes and are projected in a
similar fashion.
The City already provides water service within Gorst, Navy Yard City, and West Hills, and charges a 50%
surcharge for these customers since they are outside city limits. Rocky Point currently has its own water
district, although the water is purchased from the City of Bremerton; this study assumes that the Rocky
13
Attachment C
Point Water District would be absorbed into the City upon annexation. Therefore, annexation of these
UGAs would result in a decrease in revenues from these customers to the utilities. This will subsequently
result in a decrease in PILOT revenues to general and street funds (approximately $95,000 in 2016).
Business & Occupation Tax. City of Bremerton is slowly reducing its dependency on B&O taxes as a
major revenue source by increasing the total Gross Business Income (GBI) exemption by $20,000 per
year until the tax is no longer collected (Bremerton Municipal Code 3.48.050(2)(b)). In 2015, this
exemption is at $120,000. Due to this provision, B&O tax receipts have generally stayed flat over the last
several years. To account for this going forward, B&O revenues for both the City and the annexation
areas are projected to stay at current levels throughout the timeframe of this analysis, effectively
reducing the real value over time.
In addition, business in the PAAs would be exempt from the City's B&O tax for the first three years after
annexation. Therefore, B&O tax revenues are assumed to begin accruing to the City in 2019. For existing
Gross Business Income (GBI) in the Gorst UGA, the model assumes that the City's retail tax rate will
apply, since the majority of business activity in Gorst comes from the retail sector. This tax rate is
0.125%.
For the increase in GBI from development within the UGA, this analysis uses an effective tax rate of
0.1625% to account for exemptions and varying rates based on types of businesses. This effective rate
reflects the City's current ratio of B&O tax revenues compared to total Gross Business Income (GBI) in
the City.
Other Revenue Sources
The City receives revenue from many other sources, as described below.
Criminal Justice Tax. Kitsap County levies a dedicated sales tax to support criminal justice expenditures.
This 0.1% sales tax is collected by the state Department of Revenue, and is distributed to counties and
cities on a per capita basis. In 2014, Bremerton estimates per capita criminal justice sales tax revenue at
approximately $11.04 per capita. Future revenues are calculated on a per capita basis, with the annual
per capita revenue assumed to increase at the rate of inflation.
Solid Waste Franchise Fee. The Solid Waste provider in the City pays a franchise fee for providing this
service within the City limits. These revenues are projected on a per capita basis and are estimated to be
$3.51 per resident in 2014. These fees are assumed to extend into the PAAs upon annexation.
Building Permits and Fees, and Planning and Plan Check Fees. These fees help cover the cost of staff
that review building plans and permit applications for residents. Since the City does not set its fees on a
strict cost recovery basis, these revenues are estimated on a per capita and per job basis, and are
assumed to increase both with inflation as well as with increases in population and employment.
Business Licenses and Permits. The City of Bremerton charges a fee to obtain a business license within
the city limits. These revenues are projected based on the ratio of total employment in the City and the
annexation areas. Annual employment estimates are generated from land use and development
assumptions within the model.
EMS Levy. The City of Bremerton is currently authorized by voters to levy an Emergency Medical
Services tax. The maximum allowable levy is $0.50. In 2014, the levy rate was $0.50, since it was
renewed at the maximum rate in August 2014.
Because the EMS Levy is a form of property tax, is it subject to the same 1.0% annual increase plus new
construction in years without voter -approved increases. It is therefore assumed that the levy revenue
14
Attachment C
will begin to stabilize going forward as assessed values begin to grow at a pace more in line with
historical growth as the region recovers from the recession.
The timing of annexation will impact when the City begins to collect the EMS levy from the PAAs.
Collections would only begin in 2017 if the City annexes the UGA early in 2016.
Liquor Board Profits and Excise Tax. According to Washington State law, a share of the state profits
from liquor sales and state collected excise tax on liquor is distributed directly to cities on a per capita
basis. Currently, the City's budget estimates the per capita distribution for liquor profits and excise taxes
to be $9.89 in 2014. This per capita estimate is assumed to increase with inflation.
Gas Tax. A portion of the state -collected gas tax is shared directly with municipalities, which bear a
substantial portion of the overall costs of road maintenance and construction. The gasoline and diesel
tax is a flat amount levied per gallon (rather than a percentage of the price at the pump).
Cities are allowed to use this funding for maintenance or capital, and Bremerton uses the full funding
amount for street maintenance. The gas tax revenue estimates from the City's budget project a per
capita gas tax allocation of $20.03 in 2014. Since the tax is a per -gallon tax and not impacted by changes
in prices, this per capita number is assumed to remain constant into the future.
Municipal Court Revenues. These revenues are collected through fees that help cover the cost of
Municipal Court services. These revenues are estimated to grow with increases in population and
employment going forward, with the per capita and per employment amount growing with inflation into
the future.
Fines and Forfeits. The City's budget currently projects the per capita revenues for fines and forfeits to
be approximately $24.53 in 2014. This per capita estimate is assumed to increase with inflation going
forward.
Recreation Charges. This analysis assumes that current UGA residents are already using the City's parks
and recreation services, and therefore new revenue will only come from population growth from
development within the UGA. Users who live in the PAAs and currently pay for parks and recreation
services are charged a 25% surcharge for being non-residents. Therefore, there would be some loss in
revenue from these uses being transitioned into the City at first. Over time, the revenue from new users
will offset revenue loss from the 25% non-resident surcharge.
Grants and Other Intergovernmental Revenue. The grants and transfers from other government
agencies considered in this analysis are for operational expenditures only, not for capital projects.
Future revenues from these sources are estimated on a per capita basis and applied to the annexation
area population. The current per capita revenues, according to the City's 2014 budget, are $20.08 and
are assumed to increase at the rate of inflation. It is important to note that it is difficult to estimate this
source of revenue, as grants tend to fluctuate widely from year to year, and that very little additional
revenue will likely be seen from annexation.
Police Services and Ambulance Transport Fees. The City estimates it will receive approximately
$323,100 in 2014 from law enforcement services, such as fees for police service, fingerprint fees, and
police records searches. Currently, the City's budget projects the per capita revenues for police services
to be approximately $20.57 in 2014. This per capita estimate is assumed to increase with inflation going
forward.
This analysis assumes that the City would take over provision of fire and EMS services for Rocky Point,
West Hills, and Navy Yard City. Bremerton Fire Department estimates approximately five ambulance
transports per month from Navy Yard City, resulting in approximately $21,000 in additional revenue per
year.
ik
Attachment C
Other Charges. This analysis models approximately $250,000 in other miscellaneous revenues. These
charges include revenue streams such as investment interest, donations, miscellaneous permits and fees
not related to buildings or businesses, and other minor charges for City services. Currently the revenue
estimated in the City's budget projects the per capita revenues for these miscellaneous charges to be
approximately $6.79 in 2014. This per capita estimate is assumed to increase with inflation going
forward.
Car Tab Fees. These fees currently accrue to the Transportation Benefit District (TBD) and are used to
improve and repair existing streets. Tab fees are approved for a six year period and there is no existing
City policy on allocating these revenues between capital and operating projects. In addition, any TBD
revenues dedicated to operations in the Street fund are typically offset by expenditures to carry out the
work plan, resulting in a net fiscal impact of zero. For these reasons, car tab fee revenue estimates are
not included in this study.
Leasehold Excise Tax, Commercial Parking Tax, Gambling Tax, and Internal Charges for Service. These
revenues are not expected to be impacted by the annexation of these PAAs, as the taxes are structured
in such a way that they will not see an increase from adding the UGA to the City's boundaries.
SHORT -PERM OPERATING COST IMPACTS
Exhibit 5 summarizes the estimated cost impacts of a 2016 annexation in 2020—five years later. The
chart shows 2020 because it presents a snapshot of the short-term impact of annexation once
development in the PAAs has begun and the departments have hired up to their full short-term need.
Years 2016-2019 are not shown in the table because the exact impact in any one year will depend on
how the City chooses to ramp up its hiring. The City will need to weigh the impacts on the ground as well
as the actual revenue increases from the PAAs to determine when hiring decisions need to be made. The
methodology behind these hiring numbers is described after the chart.
Exhibit 5
Snapshot of Annexation Staffing and Cost Impacts, 2020
Estimated Staff and Cost 2020
Impacts by Department FTEs _ , , •.
City Counci I
Mayor/Auditor
Finance/Human Resources
1.50
191,000
Engineering
-
-
Law Enforcement
6.50
1,055,000
Fi re
3.00
970,000
Municipal Court
-
37,000
Community Development
1.50
207,000
Parks
0.50
84,000
Streets/Public Works
2.00
518,000
Legal
-
-
Non -departmental
-
117,000
TOTAL
15.00
3,179,000
* The annual cost includes staffing costs as well as
non -labor costs such as contracts and equipment.
Source: BERK, 2015.
iIF:
Attachment C
The annual costs listed next to the FTE amounts reflect the total annual cost increase in each of these
departments due to annexation. In some cases, these increases include equipment, supplies, utility
costs, and contract charges.
Operating Cost Detail
Operating cost and staffing impacts were estimated based on our land base fiscal model and refined
after conversations with City staff. The following departments are estimated to receive cost impacts
from the annexation:
• Finance. The finance department will likely need to add one additional Accounting Assistant II
beginning in 2017 to handle the increase in licensing activity, and about 0.5 FTE additional payroll
specialists to handle increased staffing levels in other departments.
• Police. The Police Department currently serves the City in five patrol areas with a total of 71 FTEs
including commissioned and non-commissioned staff. According to the Bremerton Police
Department, annexing all four PAAs at the same time would trigger the need for a new patrol area to
serve the residents and businesses in these areas with the same response times that other City
residents receive. While Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst do not currently generate a large call
volume, Navy Yard City is known for a high volume of service calls related to felony crimes.
If a new patrol area were added, it would require 6.0 FTEs to provide full-day patrol service. There
would also be a need for 0.5 FTE Community Resource Specialists.
There is a timing gap of approximately one year that exists for Police Officers between testing,
academy, training, and readiness for patrol activities. To bridge this gap and also to phase-in the
annexation impact in the short-term, the Police Department could add two FTEs to the graveyard
shift (8pm until 6:40am) to cover the time with the highest number of calls. Another option is adding
two FTEs to the graveyard shift and two FTEs to the day shift (6:20am until 5pm) to have better
service coverage. However, both of these scenarios would still likely result in slower response times
to the PAAs and possibly the City until the new patrol area is added.
These additional staff members will necessitate a one-time capital investment for new vehicles (3
patrol cars at $42,000 each, using ratio of two officers per car) and equipment ($5,000 per officer,
$30,000 total).
• Fire. The four PAAs differ in their estimated impacts to fire services:
o Gorst. Given the geographic constraints of the UGA, the City plans to contract with South Kitsap
Fire and Rescue (SKFR) to continue providing service to Gorst. The City would pay for this service
based on SKFR's current levy rate of $2.00 per $1,000 AV. This equates to approximately
$100,000 annually beginning in 2014, and would increase over time with development in Gorst.
o Rocky Point. Similar to Gorst, this area is currently served by SKFR. The City already responds to
calls in this area based on mutual aid agreements, and the Fire Department estimates that they
can provide service to this area with no additional staffing.
o West Hills. This area is currently served by Central Kitsap Fire and Rescue (CKFR). Considering
the small geography and low call volume, the Fire Department estimates that they can provide
service to this area with no additional staffing.
o Navy Yard City. This area is also currently served by SKFR; unlike other PAAs, it generates high
volumes of calls for service. The Fire Department estimates that annexing this area will
necessitate changes to the current response zones including the need for two additional
firefighters.
17
Attachment C
In addition, the City would likely need to add one FTE for additional fire inspection services. This
position would work with the fire marshal's office to conduct inspections of existing developments
within the annexation areas to ensure they are compliant with the City's fire code as they come into
the City's jurisdiction. This staff person would also support the need for additional inspections as
development ramps up in Gorst.
• Municipal Court. The City currently contracts for public defender services, budgeted at $285,000 per
year in the City's 2014 budget. Since the increase in demand for these services is driven by caseload,
this analysis assumes that this contract will increase proportionally with population growth over time.
To estimate the impacts of annexation, the current per capita cost of this contract within the City was
applied to the increase in population from annexation. This approach results in an estimated cost of
approximately $17,000 in 2014, growing with both inflation and population going forward. This
contract cost also grows over time due to population increase within the current city boundaries.
Considering caseload increases in the current city and annexation areas, the total contract is projected
to increase to approximately $380,000 in 2020.
In addition, the Citywill likely need to increasethe Municipal Court's capacityto hear a higher number
of cases. This can be accomplished by increasing the contracted number of hours with the Court
Commissioner, estimated to cost approximately $15,000 per year. This cost will continue to increase
with inflation annually until 2021 when an additional part-time judge (or bigger contract for the
Commissioner) is estimated to be needed.
The total cost impact of annexation is estimated at $37,000 in 2020.
Community Development. The community development department will likely need to add 1.5 FTE
additional Building Development Specialist II (building inspector and plan reviewer) to handle the
increase in permit activity citywide. These additional staff members will necessitate a one-time
capital investment for a vehicle when they are hired. The analysis assumes a one-time cost of
$36,000 for vehicle and other equipment.
• Parks Maintenance and Recreation. The City's parks Level of Service (LOS) requires a neighborhood
park to be within % mile pedestrian distance of all residences. Based on the land area included in the
PAAs and the locations of existing neighborhood and community parks, the model estimates there
would need to be seven new neighborhood parks to meet LOS requirements for the newly annexed
areas. Using a minimum of 1.5 acres per new neighborhood park, this translates into a minimum of
10.5 acres of new park area in the annexed areas. Assuming a maintenance cost to the City of
approximately $4,000 per developed acre, this would generate about $42,000 in costs per year once
the parks are developed (reflected in the model as 0.25 FTE laborer, with associated non -labor costs).
While the exact development timeline of these parks is unknown, this analysis assumes maintenance
beginning in 2019 to provide the City with a conservative estimate of cost impacts.
Additionally, based on population growth, the City may need to hire approximately 0.25 FTEs in
recreation program staff to support additional recreational users once residential development in
the UGA comes online.
• Street Maintenance. The new lane miles that will be added to the City through annexation, from both
the existing roads in the PAAs as well as new roads that will be built as the UGA develops, will drive
the need for additional maintenance staff. Based on the constraints of hiring for partial positions, the
City would have to add a full 2.0 FTE based on the additional demand.
18
Attachment C
Additionally, there will be marginal costs related to the additional lane mileage beyond staff time,
including supplies, materials, and utility costs to support the maintenance work. This results in
annual costs of significantly more than just salaries and benefits for the 2.0 FTE. These additional
non -labor costs are based on the average non -labor costs per FTE that the City currently budgets in
the Street Fund.
• Non -Departmental Impacts. In addition to department -specific impacts, the growth in population and
development will result in marginal cost increases to election services, population -based contracts
with other jurisdictions, and programs like animal control. These costs are based on the share of
population between the baseline City and the City after annexation. This analysis of non -departmental
impacts includes the following major costs:
o Election services
o Care and custody of prisoners
o Animal Control
o Kitsap County emergency management contract
o Public health district contract and alcoholism programs
Additionally, the City may incur additional costs from assuming responsibility for the proportionate
share of South Kitsap Fire and Rescue's (SKFR) debt service that is paid by residents of the PAAs.
In total, non -departmental impacts are estimated at about $100,000 per year immediately after
annexation, and the majority of these costs will grow with inflation and population over time.
The analysis assumes that the other departments not mentioned explicitly above — such as City Council,
Legal, the Mayor's and Auditor's Offices, and Engineering — will not be impacted.
The following provides an overview of short-term capital facility projects between 2015 and 2020 with
an assumption of annexation in 2016. Overall, there are nine separate short-term capital facility
projects identified, totaling approximately $18.6 million. Responsibility for these projects is divided
between the City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, public grants, and local utility LIDS. Exhibit 6 provides a
list of the individual projects by capital facility type, PAA, and funding source.
Exhibit 6 Planned Short-term Sewer Capital Projects
Capital '
UGA Projects Costs Year Funding Source
Facility Type
Sewer
Navy Yard City
Navy Yard City I & I Collection System Improvements (#4107001)
$2,650,000
2015-2016
Kitsap County
Sewer
Rocky Point
Phinney Bay Extension (Sub Basin RP -3) (#NS -2A)
$1,960,000
2016-2017
UFA/G
Sewer
Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, et al
East & West Brem UGA Sewerage - ULID Development (#NS -1 -NS -8)
$4,050,000
2016-2018
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Jackson to Corbet Drive (Sub Basin RP -3) (#NS -2F)
$830,000
2017-2018
UFA/G
Sewer
West Hills
Ostrich Bay Extension (#NS -4A)
$3,720,000
2018-2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Sewer Collection - Sub Basin RP -5 (#NS -2H)
$1,910,000
2018-2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Navy Yard City
Westside WWTP Outfall (#C-11)
$2,650,000
2019-2020
UFA
Sewer
Navy Yard City, Gorst
Grout Annular Space of SW Bremerton Force Main (#C-18)
$200,000
2020
UFA
Stormwater Gorst
Gorst Creek Watershed Flood Cause Study
$600,000
< 2020
UFA/G
Total
$18,570,000
' UFA = User
Fee Assessment: G =Grants & LID
SOURCE: City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014; Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital
Improvement Plan, 2013.
iK
Attachment C
City of Bremerton Responsibilit'
For purposes of this analysis, capital facility projects financed by user fee assessments (UFA) were
classified as City of Bremerton projects. A conservative approach was taken whereby projects that
either have full or partial City funding ownership including UFAs were categorized as City funded
projects. As a result, it is estimated that approximately $15.9 million in short-term capital facility
projects would be funded by the City.
The following provides a brief overview of short-term capital facility projects by capital type for those
projects identified as having City -based funding sources.
Fire. (Cost: None). There were no short-term capital impacts related to Fire services for annexation.
Police. (Cost: None).There were no short-term capital impacts related to Police services for annexation.
Parks. (Cost: None). There were no short-term capital impacts related to Parks services for annexation.
Sewer. One to seven projects (Cost: up to $15.3 million). A total of seven short-term sewer capital facility
projects have been identified that are located across the four annexation areas. The four PAAs differ in
their respective estimated impact to short-term sewer capital facilities as listed below. Note: Some
projects overlap or cross annexation geographies and may be listed more than once.
• Gorst. (Cost: Up to $200,000). One short-term sewer -related capital improvement project was
identified for Gorst, the Grout Annular Space of SW Bremerton Force Main. This project is funded by
the City via user assessment fees.
• Navy Yard City. (Cost: Up to $6.9 million). Three short-term sewer capital facility projects have been
identified for Navy Yard City including:
o Westside WWTP Outfall
o East and West Bremerton UGA Sewerage — ULID Development
o Grout Annular Space of SW Bremerton Force Main
All of these projects would be financed by a combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or
utility LIDS.
Navy Yard City—Additional Context: Prior to the current annexation study, the County expressed
interest in the City taking ownership of the Navy Yard City sewer infrastructure. However, as the
infrastructure for this area dates to WWII there are significant related operating, maintenance, and
capital facility costs. Approximately five years ago the County offered the City $1,000,000 in capital
funding to support transition to City ownership. At the time, it was decided that City ownership did
not make sense from a financial perspective and transition of ownership to the City did not take
place.
Currently, there is one short-term sewer capital facility project listed within the Kitsap County Public
Works Sewer Utility Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan — the Navy Yard City I & I Collection System
Improvements project, with an estimated cost of $2.7 million. Based upon conversations with the
City, this project would need to be completed by the County as a prerequisite for annexation.
Rocky Point. (Cost: up to $8.8 million). A total of four short-term capital improvement projects have
been identified including:
o Jackson to Corbet Drive Sub Basin RP -3
o Phinney Bay Extension Sub Basin RP -3
P
Attachment C
o Sewer Collection Sub Basin RP -5
o East and West Bremerton UGA Sewerage — ULID Development
All of these projects would be financed by a combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or
utility LIDS.
• West Hills. (Cost: up to $1.5 million). Two short-term capital facility projects have been identified
including:
o Ostrich Bay Extension
o East and West Bremerton UGA Sewerage — ULID Development
All of these projects would be financed by a combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or
utility LIDS.
Stormwater. One project (Cost: up to $600,000). The Gorst Creek Watershed Capital Improvement Plan
lists the need for a Flood Cause Study to evaluate flooding within the UGA. The plan estimated the cost
of the study at $600,000 and designated the City of Bremerton as responsible for funding. Listed
revenue sources for this Flood Cause Study include the stormwater fund and grants. There were no
other short-term stormwater capital facility projects identified in the remaining PAAs.
Transportation: (Cost: TBD). There were no short-term capital impacts related to transportation for
annexation.
Water. (Cost: None). There were no short-term capital impacts related to water capital facilities for
annexation.
Short-term Capital Revenues
The City of Bremerton's capital projects are primarily funded by the Capital Improvement Funds, except
for capital projects undertaken by the City's enterprise funds. Those capital projects are generally
funded by the enterprise funds themselves.
The City manages four capital improvement funds — general capital improvements, park facilities
construction, Washington Avenue connector, and Lower Wheaton Way. The largest funding sources for
Washington Avenue connector and Lower Wheaton Way are grants, which are not expected to be
impacted by annexation. The remaining capital funds are primarily supported by the Real Estate Excise
Tax (REET). This section describes how the annexation would generate additional REET revenues.
Real Estate Excise Tax. The REET is levied on all sales of real estate, both commercial and residential,
that occur within City boundaries. The City collects REET at a 0.5% tax rate based on the transaction
price of the sale.
To estimate REET revenues, this analysis makes assumptions about the turnover rate of properties
within the PAAs. The current rate of real estate sales is still slightly lower than historical averages due to
the recovery from the recession. To be conservative, this analysis assumes a turnover rate of 4.0% for
residential properties and 2.5% for commercial properties through 2015, and then a return to a more
typical rate of 5.0% for residential properties and 3.5% for commercial properties for 2016 and beyond.
0%
Attachment C
These assumptions result in the following REET revenue impacts from the PAAs: in the near term, 2016-
2020, the City is estimated to receive a total of approximately $675,000 in REET revenues from the
PAAs, or an average of about $135,000 per year. This is based on turnover of existing property as well as
sales of new development. This compares to approximately $400,000 in the City's REET revenue per
year, which is expected to increase as the economy recovers and development returns to a more typical
pace.
The City has additional revenue sources, besides REET, that can be used for capital funding. These
include the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax and the Commercial Parking Tax. However, given current pressures
on operations through the general and street funds, it may be difficult for the City to reallocate
significant portions of these funds to capital expenditures in the short-term.
KI
Attachment C
5.1 LONG-TERM OPERATING IMPACTS
Over the long run, it is estimated that revenues generated by activity in the PAAs will be higher than
costs and staffing needs generated by the areas. These general long-term fiscal impacts of annexation
mirror the short-term findings, as shown in Exhibit 3, and will result in a positive annual impact to the
City of Bremerton's operations budget.
However, as with any long-term financial analysis, there are risks inherent in some of the revenue and
cost analysis that could arise. A few issues that could substantially change the long-term outlook
include:
Development Assumptions. The development assumptions included in the model drive nearly all of the
cost and revenue findings presented above. Very few impacts are generated simply by the geography of
the annexation, rather they are generated by the people and businesses that choose to live and operate
there. Therefore, there would be risk if the PAAs did not develop as quickly as planned.
The risk is primarily that the PAAs would not have as large of a fiscal benefit to the City. Given the
moderate current population and the low level of service need, a lower development rate would result
in both lower costs and revenues, resulting in a minor and possible negligible fiscal benefit if
development did not occur.
Fire Service Needs. The short term impacts of annexing Gorst UGA are to be addressed through a
contract with South Kitsap Fire & Rescue. However in the long term, the City would need to look at
providing these services directly. In that case, the City would need a fire station (of which there is one
currently in Gorst), an engine/paramedic unit, and 6-12 FTE's to provide fire service.
5.2 LONG-TERM CAPITAL IMPACT
Over the remainder of the study period, there are additional capital facility needs, particularly for parks,
sewer, stormwater, and transportation facilities. Responsibility for these projects is divided between the
City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and private
property owners via local utility LIDS.
All Capital Facility Needs
The scope of this analysis does not include a new examination of all PAAs' capital facility needs. Instead
this section focuses on compiling and describing the capital needs identified in recent capital facility
needs analyses including:
• City of Bremerton, Bremerton Annexation of Gorst UGA Memo, 2014
• City of Bremerton, Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013
• City of Bremerton, Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement, 2013
• City of Bremerton, White Paper: Rock Point Assumption Issues, 2014
• Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Capital Improvement Program Overview, 2014
• Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Water System Plan Update, 2012
23
Attachment C
• Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update,
2014
• Bremerton Parks Department, Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2014
• Kitsap County, UGA Sizing & Composition Remand Final Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2012
• Kitsap County Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2012
• Kitsap County Public Works, Navy Yard City Sewer CFP 2015-2020
• Kitsap County Public Works, Sewer Utility Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019
• Kitsap County Public Works, Solid Waste Division Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019
• Kitsap County Public Works, Surface and Stormwater Plan Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019
• Kitsap County Public Works, Transportation Six -Year Improvement Program 2015-2020
City of Bremerton Responsibilit
Funding sources for the identified long-term capital facility projects vary by project type and include the
City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, WSDOT, grants, and local utility LIDS. For purposes of this analysis,
capital facility projects financed by user fee assessments (UFA) were classified as City of Bremerton
projects.
Overall, after the year 2020 there are 32 projected capital facility projects located across the PAAs,
totaling $51.3 million. Exhibit 7 provides a high level summary of long-term capital facility costs by
jurisdictional funding source with an estimated $33.8 million worth of capital facility projects to be
funded by the City of Bremerton.
As shown in detail in Exhibit 8, there are multiple long-term capital facility projects whose funding
sources are either undetermined or potentially shared. As a result, a conservative approach was taken
whereby projects that either have full, potential, or undetermined City funding ownership were listed as
City of Bremerton projects. A brief discussion of long-term capital facility projects by facility type is
provided below.
Exhibit 7 Long-term Capital Facility Projects by Jurisdiction
City County County/State State Total
Fire
TBD
- - - $
-
Parks
TBD
- - - $
-
Police
-
- - - $
-
Sewer $
31,890,000
- - - $
31,890,000
Stormwater $
1,858,000
- $ 456,000 $ 3,224,000 $
5,538,000
Transportation
TBD $
12,804,000 - - $
12,804,000
Water
-
- $ 1,100,000 - $
1,100,000
Total $
33,748,000 $
12,804,000 $ 1,556,000 $ 3,224,000 $
51,332,000
Source: Kitsap County/City of Bremerton Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013;
City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014; City of Bremerton Parks, Recreation & Open Space
Plan, 2014; Kitsap County Public Works Transportation Six -Year Improvement Program 2015-2020; City of Bremerton
Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014.
24
Attachment C
Fire. New fire station and equipment (Cost: TBD). Upon annexation, the South Kitsap Fire & Rescue
district would provide support services including equipment to the Gorst UGA. Over the long-term the
City would assume fire service to this area requiring a fire station and the purchase of related
equipment (e.g. fire engine, paramedic unit). The estimate for these costs are undetermined but would
be needed as part of long-term capital facilities planning for the City.
Police. (Cost: None). There were no long-term capital impacts related to Police services for annexation
identified.
Parks. Seven additional neighborhood parks totaling 10.5 acres in size (Cost: TBD). To meet Level of
Service (LOS) standards established by the City, a neighborhood class level park is required to be within
mile pedestrian distance of all residences. Based on the land area included in the PAAs and the
locations of existing neighborhood and community parks, the analysis estimates there would need to be
seven new neighborhood parks to meet established LOS requirements within the newly annexed areas.
The LOS park analysis excludes both Pendergast Park Regional Park in Navy Yard City and Harborside
Fountain Park in Bremerton.
Using a minimum of 1.5 acres per new neighborhood park, an additional seven new parks would
translate into a minimum of 10.5 acres of new park lands that would need to be purchased in the
annexed areas. The estimated cost of purchasing new park lands depends on a variety of factors such as
location, site topography, potential remediation needs, and other factors. Estimating this cost is outside
the scope of this analysis; this cost remains undetermined.
Q
Attachment C
Exhibit 8. Long-term Capital Facility Projects by Capital Facility Type
Capital Facility
Funding
UGA
Projects
Costs
Year
3
Type
Source
Fire
All
Fire station; engine/paramedic unit
TBD
> 2020
TBD
Parks'
All
7 Additional neighborhood parks (10.5 acres)
TBD
> 2020
TBD
Police
All
None
$0
> 2020
Sewer
Navy Yard City
Replace Crosstown Pipeline (#C-3)
$8,600,000
> 2020
UFA
Sewer
Navy Yard City
SR 304 Sewer Collection (#NS -3)
$4,280,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Pump Station MD -2 (#NS -2B)
$4,730,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Pump Station MD -3 (#NS -2C)
$2,830,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Sewer Collection -Sub Basin MD -1 (#NS -1A)
$2,550,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Sewer Collection -Sub Basin MD -2 (#NS -1B)
$1,320,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Sewer Collection -Sub Basin RP -1 (#NS -2D)
$1,220,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Sewer Collection -Sub Basin RP -2 (#NS -2E)
$2,180,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Sewer Collection -Sub Basin RP -4 (#NS -2G)
$820,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Sewer
Rocky Point
Sewer Collection -Sub Basin RP -5 (#NS -2H)
$1,910,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Sewer
West Hills
North Extension (#NS -4B)
$1,450,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Stormwater
All
NPDES Upgrades
TBD
> 2020
TBD
Stormwater
Gorst
Gorst Creek floodplain flooding
$15,000
> 2020
TBD
Stormwater
Gorst
Highway flooding from two creeks
$3,224,000
> 2020
WSDOT
Stormwater
Gorst
Hillside seepage & stream overbank flooding
$99,000
> 2020
TBD
Stormwater
Gorst
Private storm sewer piping creating sink hole & fish
$456,000
> 2020
County/State
passage barrier
Stormwater
Gorst
Roadway undermining and culvert clogging
$13,000
> 2020
UFA/G
Stormwater
Gorst
Storm drain piping & sink hole
$216,000
> 2020
TBD
Stormwater
Gorst
Stream overtopping
$1,049,000
> 2020
TBD
Stormwater
Gorst
Upstream Culvert 12 inlet flooding and fish
$292,000
> 2020
TBD
passage, Map ID #111010
Stormwater
Gorst
Water quality concerns with yard flooding
$0
> 2020
Stormwater
Gorst
Water quality with private pond
$0
> 2020
Stormwater
Gorst
WSDOT Hwy 3 flooding
$174,000
> 2020
TBD
Transportation
All
Possible bike improvements
TBD
> 2020
TBD
Transportation
All
Possible pedestrian Improvements
TBD
> 2020
TBD
Transportation
Gorst
Belfair Widening to 4 lanes - Bremerton City Limits
$2,822,000
> 2020
County
to Sam Christopherson Ave.
Transportation
Gorst
Belfair Widening to 4 lanes - Mason County Line to
$9,982,000
> 2020
County
Bremerton City Limits
Transportation
Gorst
Possible Intersection improvements -Sherman
TBD
> 2020
TBD
Heights Road
Water
All
None
$1,100,000
> 2020
County/State
Total
$51,332,000
1This table does not include costs of upgrading the UGAs' current transportation infrastructure to an urban standard.
2These parks were identified as part of the long-term annexation analysis, and are not identified in any existing City or County capital
documents.
3 UFA = User Fee Assessment; G =Grants & LID
Source: Kitsap County/City of Bremerton Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013;
City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014; City of Bremerton Parks, Recreation & Open Space
Plan, 2014; Kitsap County Public Works Transportation Six -Year Improvement Program 2015-2020; City of Bremerton
Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014.
Q,
Attachment C
Sewer. One to eleven projects (Cost: up to $31.9 million). A total of 11 long-term sewer capital facility
projects have been identified that would be fully or partially located within the PAAs. All of the 11 long-
term sewer projects identified are listed in the 2014 City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan
Update. The four PAAs differ in their estimated impacts to sewer capital facilities:
• Gorst. (Cost: None). No long-term sewer capital improvements have been identified.
• Navy Yard City. (Cost: Up to $12.9 million). Two long-term sewer capital improvement projects have
been identified. The first is the Replace Crosstown Pipeline project to be financed by user fee
assessments. The second is the SR 304 Sewer Collection project and it would be financed by a
combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or utility LIDS.
• Rocky Point. (Cost: up to $17.6 million). A total of eight long-term capital improvement projects
have been identified. These include two pump station projects (Pump Station MD -2 and MD -3) and
six sub -basin sewer collection projects (Sub Basin MD -1, MD -2, RP -1, RP -2, RP -4, and RP -5). All
projects would be financed by combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or utility LIDS.
• West Hills. (Cost: up to $1.5 million). One project has been identified — the North Extension project.
This project would be financed by combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or utility LIDS.
Stormwater. (Cost: up to $1.86 million). The majority of long-term stormwater projects identified are
within the Gorst annexation area. Additional NPDES-related stormwater projects are anticipated across
all PAAs (see Exhibit 9).
• All PAAs. It is anticipated that the NPDES regulatory framework adopted by the City of Bremerton
would facilitate the planning and building of new stormwater structures within any one or all of the
PAAs. To date, no NPDES related capital improvement projects have been identified nor funding
sources identified. However, upon annexation, NPDES related projects may add costs and/or
impacts to stormwater capital facility planning over the long-term.
• Gorst. Between one to seven projects (Cost: up to $1.86 million). The Gorst Creek Watershed Plan
identifies 35 sites within the watershed that need stormwater improvements. Of these projects, 11
are within the Gorst UGA. These projects are shown in Exhibit 9 below.
Exhibit 9
Long-term Stormwater Capital Facility Needs for the Gorst UGA (2018 - 2035)
Projects Costs Designated Responsibility
WSDOT Hwy 3 flooding
$174,000
City
Hillside seepage & stream overbank flooding
$99,000
City
Storm drain piping & sink hole
$216,000
City
Highway flooding from two creeks
$3,224,000
WSDOT
Stream overtopping
$1,049,000
City
Gorst Creek floodplain flooding
$15,000
City
Roadway undermining and culvert clogging
$13,000
City
Private storm sewer piping creating sink hole & fish passage barrier
$456,000
Non -city, County, State
Upstream Culvert 12 inlet flooding and fish passage, Map ID #111010
$292,000
City
Water quality concerns with yard flooding
$0
Water quality with private pond
$0
Total
$5,538,000
Source: Kitsap County/City of Bremerton Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013.
27
Attachment C
The plan provides initial cost estimates for these projects and lists the entity responsible for each
project. Of the 11 projects in the Gorst UGA, seven are designated the responsibility of the City of
Bremerton. These seven projects total $1.86 million. Responsibility for stormwater projects is based
on the Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan Technical Memorandum
completed in September, 2013.
Discussions with the City of Bremerton Public Works Department indicate that they believe the City
is only responsible for projects in the public right-of-way, which is just one project totaling $13,000.
There are also three sites where the responsibility is uncertain. These uncertain projects' costs total
$771,000. As a result, potential long-term stormwater capital costs vary widely based on how
responsibility is ultimately assigned.
To be conservative, the City may want to assume the maximum of $1.86 million when considering
the full impacts of annexation. Once Gorst residents begin paying into the City's stormwater fund,
the City may be expected to partner on drainage issues on both public and private party.
Transportation. (Cost: TBD). Future transportation infrastructure capital investments will be necessary
to achieve a modern urban standard. The City should consider long-term planning around upgrading the
UGAs' current transportation infrastructure to an urban standard which may include adding sidewalks,
curbs, gutters, bike paths, and storm drain systems. These improvements could be phased overtime as
the City identifies specific needs and revenue sources.
Water. (Cost: Up to $1.1 million). Currently, the City's Water Utility provides drinking water to the Gorst,
Navy Yard City, and West Hills annexation areas as part of the Bremerton Service Area. The City also
ultimately supplies drinking water to the Rocky Point annexation area but its relationship to Rocky Point
remains unique.
In particular, although Rocky Point conveyed its water system infrastructure to the City in 1952, the area
has maintained its own special purpose water district with an elected three-person board of
commissioners with responsibilities for administration, planning, and capital improvements. This
structure currently results in redundant costs for Rocky Point residents. Upon annexation the City would
likely enter into negotiations with the Rocky Point Water District for potential inclusion within the City of
Bremerton water utility. Prior to assumption by the City, should that occur, improvements may need to
be completed within the Rocky Point Water District, financed by non -City funding sources. These
improvements have an estimated cost of approximately $1.1 million.
28
Attachment C
Exhibit A- 1 shows the future land use map for the Gorst UGA under the Preferred Alternative.
Exhibit A-1
Gorst UGA Preferred Alternative Future Land Use Map
PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE: FUTURE LAND USE MAP
West Bremerton UGA.
City of Bremerton
Neighborhood Mixed Use"
Gorst UGA
Low Intensely
Gorst Creek Mixed Use"
Residenh al
UGA Boundary
.......... ❑Cc.L t
Preferred Alternative Land Use
opo Space!
? Commiercial Low Intensity Recreation- �netcial %Orrldor
Corridor Waterfront
�..-.....•-•---•---, i Industrial
i Gorst Mixed Use
L6�
Neighbnrhond Mixed Use
;,.••,.....-- • ••'• -•• Gorst Mixed Use
• Low Intensity Mixed Use
,.... t
•- .......... _ ........... Lnw Intensity Waterfront
City of Bremerton Gorst Creek Residential
Open Space/Recreation
�Nnte 7h7s ztrne is similar to Low Intensely Waterfront except that residential dove lopw ent is allowed. Lam
'—ty, BERK
Source: City of Bremerton, 2014.
P
Attachment D
WHAT IF WE BECAME PART OF BREMERTON...
Rocky W..r
Rocky Point is one of several unincorporated urban growth areas (UGAs)
in Kitsap County, and is primarily residential, with a population of 1,560
in 2014. Annexation to the City of Bremerton would improve residents'
representation and level of service for public safety, parks and recreation,
and utility services. Annexation would also increase a typical family of
three's total overall annual taxes, utility service costs, and fees by $143
annually.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
Annexation by the City of Bremerton would greatly enhance Rocky Point
residents' level of service for city services and over time bring urban amenities
like sidewalks, neighborhood parks, and beautification programs to the Rocky
Point area. Some examples of anticipated increases in level of service for
Rocky Point residents include:
Representation. Rocky Point residents would have more
representation in their municipal government. Rather than being
represented by three County Commissioners serving 250,000
people, residents would be served by one Mayor and seven City
Council Members serving about 40,000 people.
Police Services Rocky Point residents would be served by the
Bremerton Police Department instead of the Kitsap County Sheriff.
Bremerton Police Department's response times are at least five
minutes faster for the three highest priority call types.
Fire and EMS Services, Rocky Point residents are currently served by
�
_� the Bremerton Fire Department (through an agreement with South
Kitsap Fire and Rescue) while paying taxes to support South Kitsap
Fire and Rescue. If annexed, Rocky Point residents would pay and be
For More Information,
Please Contact:
Allison Satter, City of Bremerton
allison.salter@ci.bremerton.wa.us
360.473.5845
www.BremertonWA.gov/annexation
0
WSHINGTO" CO
FEBRUARY 2017
served directly by Bremerton Fire Department.
Parks and Recreation. Rocky Point residents would be served by the
City of Bremerton instead of Kitsap County. The City of Bremerton
provides 331 acres of parks property, as well as a 180 -acre golf course,
with geographic service standards (1/2 mile distance for neighborhood
parks and 2-5 mile distance for community parks). The City operates
Haddon Park in close proximity to Rocky Point. The City also provides
recreation programming at reduced rates for City residents.
Utilities. Rocky Point Water District would likely be assumed by the
City of Bremerton water utility, and residents served by it would
continue to receive water service, now from the City of Bremerton,
without interruption. Currently, residents of Rocky Point do not have
sewer services. Residents may be transitioned to sewer at some point
in the future, regardless of whether they are annexed. Residents
should not expect to receive sewer services as part of annexation.
"I NICIPAL TAXFq A ri FFF
If Rocky Point was annexed to the City of Bremerton, the typical single
family household with three people and two cars would see an increase of
approximately $143 in overall annual taxes, utility service costs, and fees. The
table below provides this point -in -time (based on 2016 levy rates, services
costs, and fees) estimate by individual cost. While residents would pay a bit
more, they would also benefit from increased representation and level of
service for public safety, parks and recreation, and utility services.
Transportation Benefit District
Total Costs for a Typical Single Family Household
$0 $40
$0 $40
Total Cost Difference of Incorporation 540
FEBRUARY 2017
Attachment D
Assumptions: The costs to the left represent
a point -in -time snapshot of the average
annual cost differences if annexation were
to happen today for an average family of
three that owns their own home and has
two vehicles. The assumptions used to
approximate this include:
Assessed Value $240,000
........................................................
Number of Vehicles 2
........................................................
Monthly Water Usage 7.0 HCF
........................................................
Monthly Wastewater 6.5 HCF
Monthly Electricity Bill $50
........................................................
Monthly Natural Gas Bill $25
Monthly Telephone Bill $25
........... ...........................................
Monthly
Cable Bill $75
.................................
Monthly Garbage Level 135 -gallon
of Service can weekly
........................................................
* The City is authorized to levy property
taxes on annexed properties to support
existing capital bonds. Whether or not
to levy this tax on annexed property is a
decision that will be made at the date of
annexation. For the purposes of this analysis,
we have included them (based
on a decreased levy rate estimated
using the increased assessed value
from annexation) as a potential cost to urban
growth area residents if they were to be
annexed.
** Currently, residents of Rocky Point do not
have sewer services. These residents may
be transitioned to sewer at some point in
the future, regardless of whether they are
annexed. This analysis presents a snapshot
of costs if annexation were to happen under
current conditions (based on 2016 levy
rates, services costs, and fees). As such,
sewer capital costs and service fees were not
included as a cost to annexed residents.
:111 BERK
County
Bremerton
PropertyAnnual by Typical Single
HouseholdFamily
State General Property Tax
$565
$565
Regional Library Property Tax
$92
$92
Local School Property Tax
$1,336
$1,336
County General Property Tax
$280
$280
Port Property Tax
$92
$92
PUD Property Tax
$19
$19
Noxious Weed Property Tax
$2
$2
City of Bremerton Property Tax
$0
$679
Fire Capital Bonds
$38
$130*
Fire Levy
$294
$0
EMS Levy
$120
$117
County Roads Levy
$385
$0
Total Cost for a Typical Single Family Household
$3,223
$3,312
Total Cost Difference of Incorporation
$89
Utilities Service Costs, Fees, and Taxes ..
Householda Typical Single Family
Cable TV Franchise Fees
$48
$63
Water
$488
$325
Stormwater
$87
$138
Garbage
$168
$210
Streetlighting
$3
$0
Telephone Tax
$0
$18
Natural Gas Tax
$0
$18
Electricity Tax
$0
$36
Total Cost for a Typical Single Family Household
$794
$808
1
Total Cost Difference of Incorporation
$14
Annual Fees d by Typical Single Family Household
Transportation Benefit District
Total Costs for a Typical Single Family Household
$0 $40
$0 $40
Total Cost Difference of Incorporation 540
FEBRUARY 2017
Attachment D
Assumptions: The costs to the left represent
a point -in -time snapshot of the average
annual cost differences if annexation were
to happen today for an average family of
three that owns their own home and has
two vehicles. The assumptions used to
approximate this include:
Assessed Value $240,000
........................................................
Number of Vehicles 2
........................................................
Monthly Water Usage 7.0 HCF
........................................................
Monthly Wastewater 6.5 HCF
Monthly Electricity Bill $50
........................................................
Monthly Natural Gas Bill $25
Monthly Telephone Bill $25
........... ...........................................
Monthly
Cable Bill $75
.................................
Monthly Garbage Level 135 -gallon
of Service can weekly
........................................................
* The City is authorized to levy property
taxes on annexed properties to support
existing capital bonds. Whether or not
to levy this tax on annexed property is a
decision that will be made at the date of
annexation. For the purposes of this analysis,
we have included them (based
on a decreased levy rate estimated
using the increased assessed value
from annexation) as a potential cost to urban
growth area residents if they were to be
annexed.
** Currently, residents of Rocky Point do not
have sewer services. These residents may
be transitioned to sewer at some point in
the future, regardless of whether they are
annexed. This analysis presents a snapshot
of costs if annexation were to happen under
current conditions (based on 2016 levy
rates, services costs, and fees). As such,
sewer capital costs and service fees were not
included as a cost to annexed residents.
:111 BERK
Attachment E
Existing City of Bremerton mQ N
Water
Sewer Infrastructure z�v
z
Qs
0
LL
19TH
18TH
17TH
Ui
ca
LU
CO
sr W
Legend
W y
Water Main
Sewer Mains
Study Area 0
QCity Limits 0 0.12 Mile
El
El
O
N
00
u
L
ro
Q
D
Z
LU
l7
Q
v1
z
z
0
I
luI
i
LU
0
..
(6
i
V
—
M
O
4-J
N
O
O
--"z
L
O
M
O
X
ci
_p
X
C:
O
L
O
z
0-
O
x<
X
C:
a
v
O
X
C
a-
k
O
��
o
m
o
m
X
>
o
O
a
V
c
0
0
ry
O
c
O
v
O
V)
c
V
N
0
06
a-�+
O
a--+
a
V
u
Lr)
W
a1
a1C:
Ln Ln
N Q
rB
c O Q
Ol
c
N
- - -0
>_ un
0-
O
O +,
ro
0-
N 0q)
-0 Ln
O
— +-+ >, �: T,
+-+
O
c
0•- V O O
+�+ QLn
ate1
C:X
N +_' Q i iJ
U
�
Q
0
C:
rD
._
O tjLn
O
N
Ol
V Qs
.
Q fB
4J
J O
N V Q r6
Ln N
ro
- rD
-0N
r6
in
N
V
V1
Ln
rB
Ln i
Ln
Ln
Ln
X
�
ro
r Ns O
� 0
:
N n
�
�
� L
-c (1)
� r6
Q
Y
v
r6 +_+
N O
ro p N ro c
0) -op
+., r6
Ln
N
_
ro :
+, Ln
-0
_
O N UJ X +�+
V
0 V
>
p
O
cin
� aJ N v
��-C �_0
�O
OQ
Ln p�
+, ,
W
V
W :
N
Vl r6 � 'Ln ro .�
N
a
J
W
U1
W
IEW
O
(,O
O
rV
I
LU
J
a
W
z
W
J
D
d
W
�Ln
Ln
V
aJ
M
�--+
O
a,
Ln
aJ
>.
Ln
D
m
O
O
V
LJ
O
L
C)
0
aJ
z
�
J
�
Vl
:^
O
O
ro
O
E
aJ
E
a,
al
a1
m
Ul
N
m
II
II
T
u
�n
+-j
a1
0
_0
E
�n
O
J
�
U
v
L
D
—
LU
N
cr-E
Q
O
J
ro
-0
O
J
ro
-0
X
D
D
a
W
\n
\n
—
ro
ro
Ln
Ln
a- +
a--+
O
M
tn
a1
0
ai
th
ro
J
O
4-
L
O
i
W
r -
O
W
a_
aJ
�u
a1
a�
O
ai
tn
in
ai
u
O
0-
a,
O
tn
O
a1
tn
O
El
El
w
W
uiQ
D
ui
C)
D
O
aJ
0
i
aJ
Q
O
i
Q
tn
D
Q
+j X
ai
ro
U �
aJ+j
-0 c:.— ai
+j �^
=) C:
O O
tn u
utn
-0
> ro
tn O
+j
D
N O
"'u
o O
a+j' �
ro ai
�: E
N
�
N
r
O r-
- ro
ro n
cl
U 'vi
O
R3
v
R3
4-
0
O
4J
E
v
L
0
ro
E
ro
J
N
ro
Ln
O
cm
s
O
ro
x
ro
4-
0
O
s
aJ
L
ro
D
0-
0 O
Q
tn
O
wa
tn
O_
+j
V
aJ
w
I
O
+j
+-i
aJ
a
tn
L
aJ
+j
O
El
tn
aJ
E
L
aJ
0-
0 O
L
Q
cl
L
aJ
Ln
ro
u
.E
CD
G
L
O
L
D
u
u
O
M
u
O
M
x
cliM
V
D
O
U
4-
0
aJ
O
O
m
i
O
V
_N
aJ
E
D
a,
a,
a,
O
V
aJ
D
Ln
Ln
ro
n
i
O
ro
x
ro
a,
T
+-+
ro
E
V
D
O
V
MA
D
O
U
aJ
u
ro
aJ
aJ
aJ
aJ
� o
u
ro aJ
ro D
C: -0
O
-0(IJ
cli
� L
L O
D�
u
U
O v
O
C: U)
O +j
u
x
aJ tn
Q
ro (]j
L i
OLL
4- 1--
tn O
O 0
Q ro
C:
\
V 1
l
.>
_0
:tj
V
O
}'
NO
>
cn
V_
�,
O
O
V1
ro
•V1
cQ
N
OU
O
O
• —
�n
tn:LJ�1
X
ro
N
1/
ry
ro
C
a
;
m
o
ro
>
>
ro
a
O
O
(IJ
i
Q
O
C
-
.�
N
-0
u
4J
V
vii
O
�
0
+-j
_0
O
Ol
O
>1
W
.Ln
_0
C
i
. C
O
Z
M
-
N
§
LU
Ln
4 -Ju
L
L7
i,•�
O
�
O
V
o ro
Q L
+-'
O
Q
4-j
_
ro ro
L
W
Ln
C
Z
CY)0
o
-�
�
O
o
o f
ua)
c
V
u
(a
�-�+
n
OV
N
O
C:n/
o>1>
�
—
to U
O
(n
L
a
�o0aQ
c
ro
-0 0L
^
L.L
Q
p �
a�
E L
tn
v�
Q
u1
O—
>j
ro
an
^
Dro
Q
>1
Q
p
nr'1
M
m
CO ro
CO
.
z
0
Iffli
�V
O
U
4-
0
O
Ln
O
ro
E
L
Q�
Q
ro
V
ro
L
0
N
to
O
L
ru
�V
75
O
c
O
X
v
El
0
Q
ro
O
L
X
W
m
z
Ul
ro
z
LU
Q
z-0Xro
0
O
Q
o�
+,O
N
LO
to
V
V
Iffli
�V
O
U
4-
0
O
Ln
O
ro
E
L
Q�
Q
ro
V
ro
L
0
N
to
O
L
ru
�V
75
O
c
O
X
v
El
0
Q
ro
A
z
L
p
Q
��
O
_0 l0
c
X
�N
ro
W
L
ro
Q
"�
J
—
ro
z
��(n
r
v
V
.2
L
O v
}'ra
O
ro
X
c
O
C:z
v
O O
V
Olt
O
r6ro
O
� Q
ro
O
L
ro
/
��-+
O
.i
� j
<
aj
E
E
Ln
0
Ln L
V
0
O
.Lj
0
Q
J
ro
tn
C�
0
4�
s
z 0
0
N
zLn
Lr)
M
LU
ry
O
L.L
J
V
z
O
V
LU
V
ro
V
C:
v
p
D
O
LV
— j
m
o2S
LLI
0_
0
O
W
��
N
V
N
n/
_0
LU
v
ro
X
-
,—
L I
zrl)0-
4—
°
O
VLf)
°
cli
0
v
q
E
ru
ru
V
O
V
o
z
E°
u
0
°
°
�
0
o
O
�-,
0-
0-
E
V
a
�'
°
_0
Ul
(n
R3
�-0
O
v
Z)
u
�
�X
LL
ro
c
ai
ai
Lr)•cr
4-J
ro
z
�E_��
p
•j
4-J
M
v
v
ro
LU
Ij
C-
0
r
u
O
ry
�
a
rf Wk
.....'.'.,
W
s
± P
IW
Ij
C-
0
r
u
O
ry
■■■�� ■1111111111■ ■■ ■1
111miSEE Ilmil
o-
0
Ul
L
W
v
z
:°
o
—
_0
;
z
LD
Lf)
V
W
r)
Ul
GJ
LnO
Q
ro
0-
n
r6
O
N
N
L
0
u
C
v
�
v
Q
v
`n
_ra
. �
ro
W
>
nmO-U
�p
D
iJ
I..L
dJ
N
0
��
�Ln
W
ai
as -1
N
—
Ln
O
0-
�
ro
X
ai
0
Q
v
E
O
N
tn
N
_
ro
ro
W
Dv�
O
r—_0
M
di
O
Z
+,
(!)
rV
J
r6
Q-
4-
0
zr
c
0
_0
.2
r..
�7io
�o
_0
'Zi,
_
V
Q
(13C
C:
O
W
z
ro
o
Q
��
`u
�>
_
V
�C-
zr)
00
V
V
0
■ ■
z
0
Lf)
V
W
C)
i.�
0
N
O
� O
O
�
ro
lO
M
c�
O c
N O
-C
U1
tA
>
L
-o ro
Vl 'v r
N
o
V
X
Q
+_+ V ' —
O
O C
N
TVrE
L
0-v4-
-)
s vii
EO
((An
Ok-�
O C:
ro
a �,
`O
v
r�
N
N���
c
+, C
Ln
Ln
>1
� Ov
O
�
�
Ln
� ro
>,-o
c
ro
a)u
E Z
ro
0
V
>
kn
+
D
r�
o
CO
v
E
d
—
+ a
a
ate-+—
Ul
x ro
ro
i
O
O
�
0
L ro
QJ
c�
.--C
��
4-j
-o ro
O
�
o
V
X
Q
+_+ V ' —
O
V >
L
ro
s vii
(1)c
a -
E
Ok-�
o
a �,
v
r�
oroL^
--)o
>1
>1
'�
�
a)
+J
Ul -M
c
c
D=
0 �`
a)u
E Z
ro
0
V
>
�
+
D
r�
o
CO
v
E
d
—
+ a
a
o
V
c
Lnro
ro
c�
.--C
��
4-j
�
o
+_+ V ' —
O
V >
L
O
s vii
L
N r
Ok-�
oroL^
�
s o
0-i
>1
'�
�
N
Ul -M
c
O
o
Ln +�
o
�
o
°
m
0- 0
—
+�ru
x ro
ro
ru
CA
'
(� L N
Z) (n
Qo�o
ov�vi�
-0
(1) Ln
v
_0
M
x
0- -
D��vlLn
C:+�
C
C
V .�
�
fB
N
M
0
N
Ln
ro
Q
_0
Lqn
E
un
r6
>
0
a
_0
ro
"t-
Ej
�`2E
i
Np
+-+
�--+
-
—
r6
Ul
a --i
t
�y
ruro
a..i
0
i
p
J
v
L
O O
��
--
O"
V
L
+-+
ru
_0
m
I
N E
d
ru
[�
N
_�
_0
4-1
-�C
VO
N
O
O
E
w
cm
a
N
Ln
o
ro
Q
i
Ln
E
4-
s
a
O
0
'i
—
-0
+-J
L
M4
rU
> }'
(IJ
vi
N
-J
ra
c
O
°
v�
C:
v
t
x
C
c—
-0
E�
o
O
v�1
LU
O
QLa
cro
N
o
0
i
Ul
a, C:CL
co
O
c11 ra
00
E
op
V
4J0-
Z
L
O
U
Ln
ro
m _0
N
N
m H
L
0
L!1
i
oto
o
0
aj
�0
�
0
O
o��
u
a�
o
Lin
�
4-
0,
>
oto
�
+
���
o��
ul
o
L
0
>
v
v
0
O
ro
i
N
O
v
ro
0
s
v
ro
Ln
O
CL
O
s
0
E
O
.n
s
a�
E
O
V
a�
s
4-
0
O
Q
O
ro
Ln
Z)
O
ro
Z)
E
Ln
ro
E
4-
0
O
i
O
r
r6
O
= -0
r6 (1)
4— x
O (1)
C: C:
O C:
r6
Q (-)
O
V) 4-j
ro N
ro
>1
Ln
Ul
-0
a_+ N
a -J
W
4-J
Bremerton City Council to consider
annexing Corbet Drive -)sh Farlev , Kitsap Sun 6:39 p.m. PM March 13, 2017
BREMERTON — Ken Cates counts himself as "on the fence" about Bremerton plans to annex about 30
homes on or near Corbet Drive.
As he walked his dog, Bessie, down the road on a rainy Monday morning, he estimated that being governed
by the city instead of Kitsap County wouldn't amount to that much difference.
"I don't necessary see an advantage with coming into the city," he said. "But I don't necessarily find many
negatives, either."
He has neighbors on both sides. Joe Keller, a Bremerton public works employee who lives south on Corbet,
petitioned city officials in January to take his property inside Bremerton. Prefering the city's potential zoning of
the area between Kitsap Way and Phinney Bay, Keller says he'll see a reduction of his utility bill and hopes to
push for improvements like sidewalks and lighting on the street.
Other neighbors see higher costs coming and wonder whether they'll be asked to pay for new services. Gayle
Brown, whose septic system has to be monitored to ensure nothing leaks into nearby Oyster Bay, asks
whether she'll be asked to hook up to the city's sewer system.
"It's bad enough they have to come in the house" to do such testing, she said.
The city hasn't taken in an annexation since 2009 when the South Kitsap Industrial Area, now known as Puget
Sound Industrial Center -Bremerton, joined. But bringing in new property — particularly "islands" of
unincorporated areas like Rocky Point and Navy Yard City — is a priority of Mayor Patty Lent. She sees
Corbet as "the first of many."
"It's a small step. But it's a step that's going to make us a stronger city," she said.
While there are other ways to annex properties, the City Council has instructed Lent's administration to
encourage petitioners like Keller as a way to demonstrate an area's willingness to join the city. A consultant's
analysis of Rocky Point — of which Corbet is included — found owners of a home assessed at $240,000
would see an increase of about $143 a year when considering a variety of taxes, fees and utilities.
As Keller points out, residents outside Bremerton who still rely on the city's water, sewer and stormwater
utilities must pay 50 percent more than those inside city limits. That surcharge would go away but the city also
has its own property taxes and car tab fees that would make it slightly more expensive for a property owner
there to live in the city.
Nonetheless, he sees it as time for the neighborhood to have greater city amenities: namely, a way to walk
safely down the street.
"This area has lots of kids walking on the road at night with no lighting, sidewalks or shoulders for protection,"
he said.
City planners aimed to create a "logical boundary" with Keller's home within it. The annexation includes about
30 residences along Corbet just south of 15th Street and nearly to where the road meets Phinney Bay Drive; it
also includes most homes on 17th and 19th streets between Lafayette Avenue and Morgan Road.
City leaders must attain a percentage of support from the area's neighbors to complete an annexation. The
metric used is the value of properties by the Kitsap County Assessor's Office. More than 60 percent of
combined value of an annexation area's properties must support the annexation.
In this case, the city installed a sewer line down Corbet in the 1990s. With each new connection, city officials
asked for a signed document that, when the day came for annexation, those property owners would not make
a challenge. That sewer hookup cost local neighbor Ray Scherfenberg thousands of dollars, and he's still
displeased he had to sign such a document with the city.
Bremerton is considering
annexing the area around Corbet
Drive and 17th Street. (Photo.
Meegan M. Ree / p , 3p Sun)
Lent and others believe that annexation will bring about faster police and fire service — currently, Corbet is
served by the Kitsap County Sheriffs Office and South Kitsap Fire and Rescue — and that the area will have
better representation with a City Council rather than a three-person board of commissioners.
Scherfenberg disagrees.
"I honestly don't see any benefit coming out of it," he said.
The City Council will consider the annexation at its 5:30 PM Wednesday meeting in the Norm Dicks
Government Center, 345 6t" Street.
Allison Satter
From: Nathan Kerns <jnathankerns@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 9:41 AM
To: Allison Satter
Subject: Corbet dr. Annexation
Ms. Satter,
I recently received a notice that my property on Corbet Drive is being considered for annexation into the city of
Bremerton. I understand this will be discussed at a city council meeting next week. Will this meeting be my
only chance to oppose this action? Will the residents of the area have an opportunity to vote on this proposal?
Thank you,
Nathan Kerns
Allison Satter
From: Leslie Kerns <lesliewkerns@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 8:45 AM
To: Allison Satter
Subject: Potential Annexation into the City of Bremerton
Hi Ms. Satter
We received the information in the mail on our neighborhood possibly being annexed into the
Bremerton city limits. My question to you is how do we go about protesting this proposal? We
would rather not have this happen if possible. Please advise on how/what we need to do?
Thank you,
J. Nathan and
Leslie
Kerns (Corbet Dr)
360-362-2896
•
N
' i. .f.
ar
-
4
r
00
tC
o
'
SO
QL
t
L
L
0
d
++
cot04
E
p
=
u Ln
E
T
r
Qi
-L
•w
"p
s
a
r
°' I gr
U-
r
co0zd
•
'�'S I
' i. .f.
-
4
•w
"p
a
i.
Lnlie
�+CD N °
N
tz
o U
C C4
�¢
N L
r*4
U
O
U
I
�,'
!, ��`_
� �},."- ,
t�_ .� ��
F'
k
�'�
<v.�`' t 'alp.
�i
,o"
�� !• w
#'
k , � _,�
�'
�A
'1 �' .,,..�..,
«r°P�'aa°��+iu�IIiIIG �� P
Mtl�dwir� I d �
,�:
s�
"^w -":,:.0.a
. _4.
r�;, n
ir�2" . �
a+:
"� .
Ej
ra
LA
u
i
ca
0
79
I
rr
Iw
1 M
t
1�
Zv3�-
N
U
.�
W
V
W
Q
W
W
Q
w
, --t' - 4- -4 4 -- I
Erm
� . ,� .
� .� ~^` � �>
\� � �.�. �� y �.
�\ y : � � .
� / �� � � !�\ `.,
. �� � � �\ \� \� �
\. � . . \ƒ �\ .
� � � � z� §/
: � .� w y ,� � j
. � \:,\
r
h
0
. : r
-
�
\ . e
r
om
In4
=jUJ
d r
Fc.) -w
s�
M
V) 0
OL ".
^
13