Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/08/2017 AGENDA PACKET ______________________________________________________________ th CITY COUNCIL 345 6 Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 Phone (360) 473-5280 MARCH 8, 2017 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 5:00 PM in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603 The Study Session is open to the public but there will be no opportunities for input or participation; no action is anticipated during the Study Session; and the content of these items is subject to change. If approved by Council, the items will be placed on the March 15, 2017 Council Meeting Agenda: A. NO PRESENTATION PLANNED - The following items are budgeted items or subjects that have been raised by the appropriate Council Committee Members: 1. Confirm Appointment of Jaime Forsyth to the City of Bremerton Arts Commission 2. Program 3. Purchase of four (4) 2017 Ford Interceptors for the Fire Department from Columbia Ford of Longview, WA 4. Purchase of one (1) 2017 Ford F-550 4WD Flatbed Truck for the Forestry Department from Columbia Ford of Longview, WA 5. Purchase of eight (8) Wireless Mobile Column Lifts for Equipment Services from NW Lift & Equipment of Hillsboro, OR 6. Contract Award to Michels Corporation for the 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation Project 7. Accept US Department of Transportation Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Innovative Safety Grant; and Approve WSDOT Local Agency Agreement for the West Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Projects 8. Professional Services Agreement with HDR Inc., for Design of Innovative Safety Improvements for West Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Projects B. BRIEFINGS AND FULL PRESENTATIONS 1. Briefing by the Kitsap Building Association (KBA) - Teresa Osinski, Executive Vice-President 2. Resolution to accept and approve Annexation Proceedings for territory adjacent to Corbet Drive C. GENERAL COUNCIL BUSINESS o Audit Committee Briefing (2/27/17 Special Meeting) Chair Pat Sullivan o Public Works Committee Briefing (3/7/17 Meeting) Chair TBD o Public Safety & Parks Committee Briefing (3/8/17 Meeting) Chair Leslie Daugs o D. ADJOURNMENT OF STUDY SESSION Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations should -5323 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON A1 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Confirm Appointment of Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 Jaime Forsyth to the City of Bremerton COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017 Arts Commission Department: Executive Presenter: Mayor Lent Phone: (360) 473-5266 SUMMARY: The Mayor is seeking confirmation of the appointment of Jaime Forsyth to the Arts Commission. She will be fulfilling an unexpired term due to the resignation of Eugene Brennan. The term will expire May 1, 2020. ATTACHMENTS: Application to the Commission FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None. STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent Agenda General Business Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to confirm the appointment of Jaime Forsyth to the Arts Commission with the term expiring May 1, 2020. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 01/07/15 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON A2 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Resolution No. Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 the COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017 City of Bremerton Employee Wellness Department: Human Resources Program Presenter: Lisa Garland Phone: (360) 473-5347 SUMMARY: The City of Bremerton Employee Wellness Program was established to support and improve the City employees wellness at work and home. The Employee Wellness Program Committee will be pursuing the AWC WellCity Award for 2019. One of the first steps in this process is to create a resolution or to publicly reaffirm a resolution already in place. Resolution No. 3044 adopted in 2007 is being repealed and replaced by the proposed Resolution. The Resolution shows and reaffirms City Wellness Program. ATTACHMENTS: (1) Resolution No. and (2) Resolution No. 3044 dated 12/19/2007 FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): none STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent Agenda General Business Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution No. ______, support of the City Employee Wellness Program. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 01/07/15 RESOLUTION NO. ___________ A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, reaffirming its support of the Employee Wellness Program. WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that wellness p awareness of their health options by providing access to education and activities, and motivate and empower employees to make positive health-enhancing, lifestyle choices; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that improvement to all employees health through active workplace health promotion, activities and education results in better morale, reduces sick leave usage and enhances productivity and performance; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of decreasing the use of health care services under provider health benefits plans and improving employee health; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2007, the City Council passed Resolution No. 3044 supporting the City of Bremerton Employee Wellness Program which includes a Wellness Committee consisting of City employees; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to reaffirm its support of the City of Bremerton Employee Wellness Program aimed at providing education to prevent illness and injuries, promoting better employee health and morale through activities and reducing absenteeism; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Resolution No. 3044 is hereby repealed and replaced in its entirety with this resolution. SECTION 2. City Council hereby expresses and reaffirms its support of the City of Bremerton Employee Wellness Program and agrees to participate with City employees in the program. SECTION 3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this _____ day of __________________, 2017. _________________________________ ERIC YOUNGER, Council President 1 Employee Wellness Program APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: __________________________________ ________________________________ ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk R:\\Legal\\Legal\\Resolutions\\HR\\Employee Wellness Program UPDATED 02.24.2017.doc 2 Employee Wellness Program AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON A3 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Purchase of four (4) 2017 Ford Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 Interceptors for the Fire Department from COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017 Columbia Ford of Longview, WA Department: Fire Presenter: Pat McGanney, Fire Chief Phone: (360) 473-5380 SUMMARY: The Fire Department is proposing to purchase four Fire Department staff vehicles. The total cost for the four (4) vehicles is $139,112.67 including Washington State sales tax. The Fire Department is utilizing State Contract No. 05916 for the purchase. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Quote from Columbia Ford 2) Justification for replacement FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): This is budgeted through the Public Safety Bond. The total cost for the four (4) vehicles is $139,112.67. STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent Agenda General Business Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the purchase of four (4) Ford Interceptors in the amount of $139,112.67, including Washington State sales tax, from Columbia Ford of Longview. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 01/07/15 Pat McGanney Fire Chief 911 Park Avenue Bremerton, WA 98337 (360) 473-5381 FAX (360) 473-5397 EQUIPMENT JUSTIFICATION Date: 2/24/2017 TO: File FROM: Pat McGanney, Fire Chief SUBJECT: 2017 PURCHASE OF 4 FORD INTERCEPTORS This purchase includes four 2017 Ford Interceptors for replacement of the vehicles listed below. This purchase of vehicles was set forth in the public safety bond. The Police Department, Public Works, or other departments may acquire the replaced vehicles for their use. Vehicle # Year Model Miles 101 2007 Ford Escape 59,000 104 2007 Ford Escape 45,000 103 2008 Ford Escape 65,000 105 2008 Ford Escape 96,000 Serving the Citizens of Bremerton Since 1901 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON A4 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Purchase of one (1) 2017 Ford Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 F-550 4WD Flatbed Truck for the Forestry COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017 Department from Columbia Ford of Department: PWU / ERR Longview, WA Presenter: Milenka Hawkins-Bates Phone: (360) 473-5333 SUMMARY: The approved 2017 budget shows a replacement in the Forestry Department of a 1994 Chevrolet 3500 Flat Bed that is used for fire suppression. The requested replacement is a 2017 Ford F-550 4wd Flatbed with all required options per state contract No. 05916 in the amount of $59,509.48 including Washington State sales tax. The authorized dealer is Columbia Ford, Longview WA. The replaced vehicle will be removed from the fleet. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Washington State Contract 05916,quote 2017-2-620; 2) Justification FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Budgeted within the 510 fund at $40,000 STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent Agenda General Business Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the purchase of a 2017 Ford F-550 4WD Flatbed Truck with all required options per State Contract No. 05916 in the amount of $59,509.48 including Washington State sales tax. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 01/07/15 Avg Maint $$700 ! Criteria Forestry ge and maintenance ACriteria have been met 50 for 5 - 5360 - ,000 Mileage 18 the criteria is as follows: 2017 Ford F FAX (360) 473 , 5315 - 94 (360) 473 Purchase of Purch Date 05/01/ replacement 50 for 5 - Bates, Administrative/Operations Manager - 2017 Bremerton, WA 98312 EQUIPMENT JUSTIFICATION , 2017 Ford F February 27FileMilenka Hawkins2017 Vehicle Justification Description 1994 Chevrolet 3500 FB Public Works and Utilities Department 100 Oyster Bay Ave. N. 49 Vehicle# DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: This purchase includes 00 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON A5 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Purchase of eight Wireless Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 Mobile Column Lifts for Equipment Services COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017 from NW Lift & Equipment of Hillsboro, OR Department: PWU/ERR Presenter: Milenka Hawkins-Bates Phone: (360) 473-5333 SUMMARY: The approved 2017 budget for ERR includes replacement of six heavy vehicle column lifts. The department has selected for replacement two sets of four wireless mobile columns in the amount of $78,257.64 including Washington state sales tax. Staff will be utilizing Washington State Contract No. 05316. The current lifts will go to auction or will be traded in. ATTACHMENTS: Quote from NW Lift & Equipment FISCAL IMPACTS: Budgeted within the 509 fund STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent Agenda General Business Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the purchase of eight Wireless Mobile Column Lifts per State Contract No. 05316 in the amount of $78,257.64 including Washington state sales tax. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 01/07/15 February 17, 2017 City of Bremerton Attn: Chuck Ernst Subject: Wireless Mobile ColumnsQuote Dear Chuck, Thank you for choosing Northwest Lift & Equipment for your equipment needs. Per your request, we are pleased to quote our Stertil-Koni WirelessMobile Column liftsperthe WSCAcontract#05316 as follows: 2Setsof 4 ST-1075-2FWAmobile columns 66,000 lbs lifting capacityper set of 4, 24 volts DC, with a control box on every column,fixed wheels,and adjustable forks. YOUR WSCACOST $71,796.00 Units arequoted FOB your locationand includes installation and training for all your personnel. Terms are net 30 days. Delivery is approximately 30-60days ARO. Installation will include off-loading equipment from the freight truck at your job site, load testing with customer-furnished vehicle, training all personnel on safe and correct operation of the lifts, and trainingall facility maintenance personnel on proper care and troubleshooting of the lifts. Trade in value of current lifts:$ 6,000.00 Chuck, thank you for your interest in our Stertil-Koni Heavy Duty Lifts. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me byemailDavid@nwlift.comoron my cell phone at 503-267-1498. Sincerely, David Fay NW Lift & Equipment AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON A6 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Contract Award to Michels Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 Corporation for the 2017 Sewer COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017 Rehabilitation Project Department: PW&U Presenter: Knuckey Phone: (360) 473-2376 SUMMARY: The project will rehabilitate approximately 8249 lineal feet of sanitary sewer using the cure-in-place-pipe (CIPP) method, reinstating approximately 101 side sewers. Kitsap County has agreed to reimburse the city in the amount of $16,400 as its fair share of the cost of lining shared a 24 inch concrete pipe under SR3 and an inter-local agreement (ILA) has been executed with the County for that work. There were three bids submitted which were opened on February 23, 2017. The lowest responsive, responsible bidder was Michels Corporation who submitted a bid in the amount of $797,622.22 which includes sales tax. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement; 2. Kitsap County ILA; 3. Vicinity Map; and 4. Bid Tabulation. FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The project is included in the 2017 Capital Budget. The ILA with Kitsap County provides for reimbursement of $16,400. STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent Agenda General Business Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to award the contract for the 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation to Michels Corporation in the amount of $797,622.22, including Washington State sales tax, and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 01/07/15 CONTRACT Ȩ¯ ¦¤ ΐ ®¥ Βȩ 4()3 !'2%%-%.4 ¨² £ ³¤£ ³§¤ £ ¸ ®¥ ¨­ ³§¤ ¸¤ ± 2017 ¡¸  ­£ ¡¤³¶¤¤­ #¨³¸ ®¥ "±¤¬¤±³®­ Ȩ§¤±¤¨­ ¥³¤± ¢ ««¤£ #)49ȩ  ­£ Ȩ§¤±¤¨­ ¥³¤± ¢ ««¤£ #/.42!#4/2ȩȁ #)49  ­£ #/.42!#4/2Ǿ ¨­ ¢®­²¨£¤± ³¨®­ ®¥ ³§¤ ¬´³´ « ¢®µ¤­ ­³² §¤±¤¨­ ¥³¤± ²¤³ ¥®±³§Ǿ  ¦±¤¤  ² follows: !24)#,% ΐȁ 7/2+ȁ #/.42!#4/2 ²§ «« ¢®¬¯«¤³¤ ³§¤ 7/2+  ² ²¯¤¢¨¥¨¤£ ®± ¨­£¨¢ ³¤£ ¨­ ³§¤ #)49͒² #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³² entitl¤£ 2017 3¤¶¤± 2¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨®­ !24)#,% Αȁ #/.42!#4 4)-%3ȁ 4§¤ 7/2+ ²§ «« ®¡³ ¨­ 3´¡²³ ­³¨ « #®¬¯«¤³¨®­ ¶¨³§¨­ 120 ¢ «¤­£ ± £ ¸² ¥±®¬ ³§¤ ¢®¬¬¤­¢¤¬¤­³ £ ³¤ ²³ ³¤£ ¨­ ³§¤ .®³¨¢¤ ³® 0±®¢¤¤£ȁ 4¨¬¤ ¨² ®¥ ³§¤ ¤²²¤­¢¤  ² ³® ¤ ¢§  ­£ ¤µ¤±¸ £¤ £«¨­¤ ²¤³ ¥®±³§ ¨­ t§¨²  ¦±¤¤¬¤­³ȁ 4§¨² ¯±®µ¨²¨®­ § ² ¡¤¤­ ²¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ««¸ ­¤¦®³¨ ³¤£ȁ !24)#,% Βȁ ,)15)$!4%$ $!-!'%3ȁ #)49  ­£ ³§¤ #/.42!#4/2 ±¤¢®¦­¨¹¤ ³§ ³ ³¨¬¤ ¨² ®¥ ³§¤ ¤²²¤­¢¤ ¥®± ³§¨² !¦±¤¤¬¤­³  ­£ ³§ ³ ³§¤ #)49 ¶¨«« ²´¥¥¤± ¥¨­ ­¢¨ « «®²² ¨¥ ³§¤ 7/2+ ¨² ­®³ ¢®¬¯«¤³¤£ ¶¨³§¨­ ³§¤ ³¨¬¤ ²¯¤¢¨¥¨¤£ ¨­ !±³¨¢«¤ Α §¤±¤¨­Ǿ ¯«´²  ­¸ ¤·³¤­²¨®­² ³§¤±¤®¥  ««®¶¤£ ¨­  ¢¢®±£ ­¢¤ ¶¨³§ 3¤¢³¨®­ ΐ-ΏΗȁΗ ®¥ ³§¤ 3³ ­£ ±£ 3¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ³¨®­² ¶§¨¢§ ¬ ¸ ¡¤ ¬®£¨¥¨¤£ ¡¸ ³§¤ 3¯¤¢¨ « 0±®µ¨²¨®­²ȁ 4§¤¸  «²® ±¤¢®¦­¨¹¤ ³§¤ £¤« ¸²Ǿ ¤·¯¤­²¤Ǿ  ­£ £¨¥¥¨¢´«³¨¤² ¨­µ®«µ¤£ ¨­ ¯±®µ¨­¦ ¨­   «¤¦ « ¯±®¢¤¤£¨­¦ ³§¤  ¢³´ « «®²² ²´¥¥¤±¤£ ¡¸ ³§¤ #)49 ¨¥ ³§¤ 7/2+ ¨² ­®³ ¢®¬¯«¤³¤£ ®­ ³¨¬¤ȁ !¢¢®±£¨­¦«¸Ǿ ¨­²³¤ £ ®¥ ±¤°´¨±¨­¦  ­¸ ²´¢§ ¯±®®¥Ǿ ³§¤ #/.42!#4/2 ²§ «« ¯ ¸ ³§¤ #)49 «¨°´¨£ ³¤£ £ ¬ ¦¤² ¨­ ³§¤  ¬®´­³ ®¥ $1000 ¯¤± £ ¸ after ³§¤ £ ³¤ ®¥ 3´¡²³ ­³¨ « #®¬¯«¤³¨®­ȁ !24)#,% Γȁ #/.42!#4 02)#%ȁ #)49 ²§ «« ¯ ¸ #/.42!#4/2 ¥®± ¢®¬¯«¤³¨®­ ®¥ ³§¤ 7/2+ ¨­  ¢¢®±£ ­¢¤ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³² ¨­ ³§¤  ¬®´­³ ²¤³ ¥®±³§ ¨­ ³§¤ "¨£ 0±®¯®² «Ǿ ¶§¨¢§ ²§ «« ¨­¢«´£¤ ² «¤² ³ ·  ² ¯±®µ¨£¤£ ¨­ Se¢³¨®­ ΐ-ΏΖȁΑȨΑȩ ®¥ ³§¤ 3¯¤¢¨ « 0±®µ¨²¨®­²ȁ !24)#,% Δȁ 0!9-%.4 02/#%$52%3ȁ #/.42!#4/2 ²§ «« ²´¡¬¨³ !¯¯«¨¢ ³¨®­² ¥®± 0 ¸¬¤­³ ¨­  ¢¢®±£ ­¢¤ ¶¨³§ 3¤¢³¨®­ ΐ-ΏΘȁΘ ®¥ ³§¤ 3³ ­£ ±£ 3¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ³¨®­² ¶§¨¢§ ¬ ¸ ¡¤ ¬®£¨¥¨¤£ ¡¸ ³§¤ 3¯¤¢¨ « 0±®µ¨²¨®­²ȁ !¯¯«¨¢ ³¨®­² ¥®± 0 ¸¬¤­³ ¶¨«« ¡¤ ¯±®¢¤²²¤£ ¡¸ %.').%%2  ² ¯±®µ¨£¤£ ¨­ ³§¤ 3¯¤¢¨ « 0±®µ¨²¨®­² _____________ #®­³± ¢³®± )­¨³¨ «² City of Bremerton February 2017 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation CF-1 CONTRACT Ȩ¯ ¦¤ Α ®¥ Βȩ !24)#,% Εȁ #/.42!#4 $/#5-%.43ȁ 4§¤ #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³² ¶§¨¢§ ¢®¬¯±¨²¤ ³§¤ ¤­³¨±¤  ¦±¤¤¬¤­³ ¡¤³¶¤¤­ #)49  ­£ #/.42!#4/2 ¢®­¢¤±­¨­¦ ³§¤ 7/2+ ¢®­²¨²³ ®¥ ³§¨² #®­³± ¢³  ­£ ³§¤ ¥®««®¶¨­¦ ¶§¨¢§  ±¤ ¤¨³§¤±  ³³ ¢§¤£ ®± ¨­¢®±¯®± ³¤£ §¤±¤¨­ ¡¸ ±¤¥¤±¤­¢¤Ȁ - .®³¨¢¤ )­µ¨³¨­¦ "¨£²Ǿ - "¨££¤±² #§¤¢ª«¨²³Ǿ - "¨£ 0±®¯®² « ¨­¢«´£¨­¦ ³§¤ 0±®¯®² « &®±¬²Ǿ )­¥®±¬ ³¨®­ 2¤°´¨±¤£ ®¥ "¨££¤±Ǿ "¨£ "®­£Ǿ  ­£  «« ±¤°´¨±¤£ ¢¤±³¨¥¨¢ ³¤²  ­£  ¥¥¨£ µ¨³²Ǿ - 0¤±¥®±¬ ­¢¤ "®­£Ǿ - 0 ¸¬¤­³ "®­£Ǿ - 3³ ­£ ±£ 3¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ³¨®­²Ǿ - !¬¤­£¬¤­³² ³® ³§¤ 3³ ­£ ±£ 3¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ³¨®­²Ǿ - Appendices, - 3¯¤¢¨ « 0±®µ¨²¨®­²Ǿ - #®­³± ¢³ 0« ­²Ǿ - !££¤­£  ­´¬¡¤±² ͑͑͑͑͑ ³® ͑͑͑͑͑Ǿ ¨­¢«´²¨µ¤ȁ - #§ ­¦¤ /±£¤±² ¶§¨¢§ ¬ ¸ ¡¤ £¤«¨µ¤±¤£ ®± ¨²²´¤£  ¥³¤± %¥¥¤¢³¨µ¤ $ ³¤ ®¥ ³§¤ !¦±¤¤¬¤­³  ­£  ±¤ ­®³  ³³ ¢§¤£ §¤±¤³®ȁ 4§¤±¤  ±¤ ­® #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³² ®³§¤± ³§ ­ ³§®²¤ «¨²³¤£ ¨­ ³§¨² !±³¨¢«¤ Εȁ 4§¤ #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³² ¬ ¸ ®­«¸ ¡¤  ¬¤­£¤£ ¡¸ #§ ­¦¤ /±£¤±  ² ¯±®µ¨£¤£ ¨­ 3¤¢³¨®­ ΐ-ΏΓȁΓ ®¥ ³§¤ 3³ ­£ ±£ 3¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ³¨®­² ¶§¨¢§ ¬ ¸ ¡¤ ¬®£¨¥¨¤£ ¡¸ ³§¤ 3¯¤¢¨ « 0±®µ¨²¨®­²ȁ !24)#,% Ζȁ ).$%-.)&)#!4)/.ȁ 4§¤ #/.42!#4/2  ­£ #)49  ¢ª­®¶«¤£¦¤  ­£  ¦±¤¤ ³§ ³ ³§¤¸ § µ¤ ­¤¦®³¨ ³¤£ ³§¤ ¥®««®¶¨­¦ ¨­  ¢¢®±£ ­¢¤ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ ±¤°´¨±¤¬¤­³² ®¥ 2#7 ΓȁΑΓȁΐΐΔ  ­£ ³§¤ #/.42!#4/2 ²¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ««¸ ¶ ¨µ¤² §¨² ¨¬¬´­¨³¸ ´­£¤± ¨­£´²³±¨ « ¨­²´± ­¢¤ ´­£¤± 4¨³«¤ Δΐ 2#7ȁ 4® ³§¤ ¥´««¤²³ ¤·³¤­³ ¯¤±¬¨³³¤£ ¡¸ , ¶²  ­£ 2¤¦´« ³¨®­²Ǿ ³§¤ #/.42!#4/2 ²§ «« ¨­£¤¬­¨¥¸Ǿ £¤¥¤­£Ǿ  ­£ §®«£ § ±¬«¤²² ³§¤ #)49Ǿ %.').%%2Ǿ ³§¤¨± ¢®­²´«³ ­³²Ǿ ²´¡ ¢®­²´«³ ­³²Ǿ  ­£ ³§¤ ®¥¥¨¢¤±²Ǿ £¨±¤¢³®±²Ǿ ¤¬¯«®¸¤¤²Ǿ  ­£  ¦¤­³² ®¥ ¤ ¢§  ­£  ­¸ ®¥ ³§¤¬Ǿ  ¦ ¨­²³  ­£ ¥±®¬  ­¸  ­£  «« ¢« ¨¬²Ǿ ¨­©´±¨¤²Ǿ £ ¬ ¦¤²Ǿ «®²²¤² ®± ²´¨³²Ǿ ¨­¢«´£¨­¦  «« «¤¦ « ¢®²³²  ­£  ³³®±­¤¸ ¥¤¤²Ǿ  «« ¢« ¨¬²  ­£ «¨ ¡¨«¨³¸  ±¨²¨­¦ ´­£¤±Ǿ ¡¸ ±¤ ²®­ ®¥Ǿ ±¤« ³¤£Ǿ ®± ¨­¢¨£¤­³ « ³® ³§¤ #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³² ®±  ­¸ ¯¤±¥®±¬ ­¢¤ ®¥ ³§¤ 7/2+Ǿ ¡´³ ­®³ ¥±®¬ ³§¤ ²®«¤ ­¤¦«¨¦¤­¢¤ ®± ¶¨««¥´« ¬¨²¢®­£´¢³ ®¥ ³§¤ #)49  ­£ȝ®± ³§¤ %.').%%2  ² ¥´±³§¤± £¤¥¨­¤£ ¨­ ³§¤ #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³²ȁ 4§¤ ¯±®µ¨²¨®­² ®¥ ³§¨² ²¤¢³¨®­ ²§ «« ²´±µ¨µ¤ ³§¤ ³¤±¬¨­ ³¨®­ ®¥ ³§¤ ¢®­³± ¢³ȁ _____________ #®­³± ¢³®± )­¨³¨ «² City of Bremerton February 2017 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation CF-2 CONTRACT Ȩ¯ ¦¤ Β ®¥ Βȩ !24)#,% Ηȁ !33)'.-%.4 .®  ²²¨¦­¬¤­³ ¡¸   ¯ ±³¸ §¤±¤³® ®¥  ­¸ ±¨¦§³² ´­£¤± ®± ¨­³¤±¤²³² ¨­ ³§¤ #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³² ¶¨«« ¡¤ ¡¨­£¨­¦ ®­  ­®³§¤± ¯ ±³¸ §¤±¤³® ¶¨³§®´³ ³§¤ ¶±¨³³¤­ ¢®­²¤­³ ®¥ ³§¤ ¯ ±³¸ ²®´¦§³ ³® ¡¤ ¡®´­£ǿ  ­£ ²¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ««¸ ¡´³ ¶¨³§®´³ «¨¬¨³ ³¨®­ ¬®­¨¤² ³§ ³ ¬ ¸ ¡¤¢®¬¤ £´¤  ­£ ¬®­¨¤² ³§ ³  ±¤ £´¤ ¬ ¸ ­®³ ¡¤  ²²¨¦­¤£ ¶¨³§®´³ ²´¢§ ¢®­²¤­³ Ȩ¤·¢¤¯³ ³® ³§¤ ¤·³¤­³ ³§ ³ ³§¤ ¤¥¥¤¢³ ®¥ ³§¨² ±¤²³±¨¢³¨®­ ¬ ¸ ¡¤ «¨¬¨³¤£ ¡¸ « ¶ȩǾ  ­£ ´­«¤²² ²¯¤¢¨¥¨¢ ««¸ ²³ ³¤£ ³® ³§¤ ¢®­³± ±¸ ¨­  ­¸ ¶±¨³³¤­ ¢®­²¤­³ ³®  ­  ²²¨¦­¬¤­³Ǿ ­®  ²²¨¦­¬¤­³ ¶¨«« ±¤«¤ ²¤ ®± £¨²¢§ ±¦¤ ³§¤  ²²¨¦­®± ¥±®¬  ­¸ £´³¸ ®± ±¤²¯®­²¨¡¨«¨³¸ ´­£¤± ³§¤ #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³²ȁ 4§¤ #)49Ǿ ¨­ ¨³² ²®«¤ £¨²¢±¤³¨®­Ǿ ¬ ¸ ±¤¥´²¤ ³®  ««®¶ ³§¤ #/.42!#4/2 ³®  ²²¨¦­  ­¸ ®±  «« ®¥ ¨³² £´³¨¤²Ǿ ±¨¦§³²  ­£ȝ®± ±¤²¯®­²¨¡¨«¨³¨¤² ´­£¤± ³§¤ !¦±¤¤¬¤­³Ǿ ¤·¢¤¯³ ¶¨³§ ±¤¦ ±£² ³®  ­  ²²¨¦­¬¤­³ ®¥ ¥´­£² ¥®± ²¤¢´±¨³¸ ¯´±¯®²¤²ȁ )­ ³§¤ ¢ ²¤ ®¥  ­  ²²¨¦­¬¤­³ ¥®± ²¤¢´±¨³¸ ¯´±¯®²¤² ³§¤ #)49 ¬ ¸ ¢®­£¨³¨®­ ¨³²  ¯¯±®µ « ³® ³§¤ ¤·³¤­³ ¨³ £¤¤¬² ­¤¢¤²² ±¸ ³®  ²²´±¤ ³§ ³ ³§¤±¤ ¶¨«« ¡¤  £¤°´ ³¤ ¥´­£² ³® ¢®¬¯«¤³¤ ³§¤ 7/2+  ­£ ³® ¯ ¸   ²´¡¢®­³± ¢³®±²  ­£ ²´¯¯«¨¤±²ȁ #)49  ­£ #/.42!#4/2 ¤ ¢§ ¡¨­£² ¨³²¤«¥Ǿ ¨³² ¯ ±³­¤±²Ǿ ²´¢¢¤²²®±²Ǿ  ²²¨¦­²  ­£ «¤¦ « ±¤¯±¤²¤­³ ³¨µ¤² ³® ³§¤ ®³§¤± ¯ ±³¸ §¤±¤³®Ǿ ¨³² ¯ ±³­¤±²Ǿ ²´¢¢¤²²®±²Ǿ  ²²¨¦­²  ­£ «¤¦ « ±¤¯±¤²¤­³ ³¨µ¤² ¨­ ±¤²¯¤¢³ ®¥  «« ¢®µ¤­ ­³²Ǿ  ¦±¤¤¬¤­³²  ­£ ®¡«¨¦ ³¨®­² ¢®­³ ¨­¤£ ¨­ ³§¤ #®­³± ¢³ $®¢´¬¤­³²ȁ ). 7)4.%33 7(%2%/&Ǿ #)49  ­£ #/.42!#4/2 § µ¤ ¢ ´²¤£ ³§¨² !¦±¤¤¬¤­³ ³® ¡¤ ¤·¤¢´³¤£ ³§¤ £ ¸  ­£ ¸¤ ± ¥¨±²³  ¡®µ¤ ¶±¨³³¤­ȁ #)49 Ȁ #¨³¸ ®¥ "±¤¬¤±³®­ #/.42!#4/2 (Signature) (Signature) "¸ "¸ Ȩ0±¨­³¤£ ­ ¬¤ȩ Ȩ0±¨­³¤£ ­ ¬¤ȩ Ȭ#/20/2!4% 3%!,ȭ !³³¤²³ !³³¤²³ !££±¤²² ¥®± ¦¨µ¨­¦ ­®³¨¢¤² !££±¤²² ¥®± ¦¨µ¨­¦ ­®³¨¢¤² ,¨¢¤­²¤ .®ȁ !¯¯±®µ¤£  ² ³® &®±¬Ȁ !¦¤­³ ¥®± ²¤±µ¨¢¤ ®¥ ¯±®¢¤²²Ȁ (Signature) (Title) City of Bremerton February 2017 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation CF-3 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON A7 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Accept US Department of Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 Transportation Highway Safety Improvement COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017 Program (HSIP) Innovative Safety Grant; Department: PW&U and Approve WSDOT Local Agency Presenter: Knuckey Agreement for West Belfair Valley and Phone: (360) 473-2376 Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Projects SUMMARY: The City has been offered a Highway Safety Improvement Grant under the 2016 Innovative Safety Program to construct high friction pavement and guardrails on both West Belfair Valley and Tracyton Beach Roads. The project cost is $1,675,490. The grant requires a 10% match; however, the match is waived for each project phase that begins before August 31, 2017. To obtain construction obligation before the August 31 deadline the project must be expedited. The offered grant will be in WSDOT Standard Forms, with their standard terms and conditions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Grant Award Letter, 2. Site Plan, 3. Local Agency Agreement, 4. Local Agency Federal Aid Prospectus (blank) FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The 10% match for design (Preliminary Engineering) will be waived. The construction match is identified as $148,273, and will be waived assuming construction obligation is received by August 31, 2017. This project is not included in the 2017 budget, but will be added at mid-year. STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent Agenda General Business Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to accept the US Department of Transporation Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Innovative Safety Grant; approve the Local Agency Agreement with WSDOT for West Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Projects; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 01/07/15 SCALE:1"=1200' VICINITY MAP CITY OF BREMERTON WEST BELFAIR VALLEY ROAD PROJECT LOCATIONPROJECT LOCATION SCALE:1"=1200' VICINITY MAP CITY OF BREMERTON TRACYTON BEACH ROAD PROJECT LOCATION Local Agency Federal Aid Project Prospectus Route( )Date Federal Aid DUNS Number Project Number Local Agency Federal Employer WSDOT Project NumberUse Only () AgencyCA AgencyFederal Program Title Yes No 20.205 Other Project Title Start Latitude N Start Longitude W End Latitude NEnd Longitude W Project Termini From-ToNearest City NameProject Zip Code (+4) Begin Mile PostEnd Mile PostLength of ProjectAward Type Local Local Forces State Railroad Begin Mile PointEnd Mile PointCity NumberCounty NumberCounty Name WSDOT RegionLegislative District(s)Congressional District(s)Urban Area Number Total Local Agency Phase Start Federal Funds Phase Estimated CostFundingDate (Nearest Hundred Dollar)(Nearest Hundred Dollar)(Nearest Hundred Dollar)Month Year P.E. R/W Const. Total Description of Existing Facility (Existing Design and Present Condition) Roadway WidthNumber of Lanes Description of Proposed Work Description of Proposed Work (Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary) Local Agency Contact PersonTitlePhone Mailing AddressCityStateZip Code By Approving Authority Project Prospectus Title Date DOT Form 140-101Page 1 Previous Editions Obsolete Revised 04/2015 AgencyProject TitleDate Type of Proposed Work Project Type (Check all that Apply)Roadway WidthNumber of Lanes New Construction Path / Trail 3-R Reconstruction Pedestrian / Facilities 2-R Railroad Parking Other Bridge Geometric Design Data DescriptionThrough RouteCrossroad Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Federal Urban Urban Collector Collector Rural Rural Functional Major Collector Major Collector NHS NHS Minor Collector Minor Collector Local Access Local Access Terrain Flat Roll Mountain Flat Roll Mountain Posted Speed Design Speed Existing ADT Design Year ADT Design Year Design Hourly Volume (DHV) Performance of Work Preliminary Engineering Will Be Performed ByOthersAgency %% Construction Will Be Performed ByContractAgency %% Class I - Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Class III - Categorically Excluded (CE) Project Involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404 Projects Requiring Documentation Interagency Agreement(Documented CE) Class III - Environmental Assessment (EA) Project Involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404 Interagency Agreements Environmental Considerations DOT Form 140-101Page 2 Previous Editions Obsolete Revised 04/2015 AgencyProject TitleDate Right of Way No Right of Way Needed Right of Way Needed * All construction required by the No Relocation Relocation Required contract can be accomplished within the exiting right of way. UtilitiesRailroad No utility work required No railroad work required All utility work will be completed prior to the start All railroad work will be completed prior to the start of of the construction contractthe construction contract All utility work will be completed in coordination All the railroad work will be completed in coordination with the construction contractwith the construction contract Is any airport located within 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) of the proposed project? Yes No Remarks This project has been reviewed by the legislative body of the administration agency or agencies, or it’s designee, and is not inconsistent with the agency’s comprehensive plan for community development. Agency By Date Mayor/Chairperson DOT Form 140-101Page 3 Previous Editions Obsolete Revised 04/2015 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON A8 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Professional Services Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 Agreement with HDR, Inc. for Design of COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017 Innovative Safety Improvements for West Department: PW&U Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Presenter: Knuckey Road Innovative Safety Projects Phone: (360) 473-2376 SUMMARY: The City has been offered a Highway Safety Improvement Grant under the 2016 Innovative Safety Program to design and construct high friction pavement and guardrails on both West Belfair Valley and Tracyton Beach Roads. The City advertised a Request for Qualifications, and received proposals from two firms to perform the design. The City selected HDR, Inc., to do the work; their design cost is $146,699.30 and is eligible for 100% grant funding upon receipt of design obligation from WSDOT. Staff will withhold notice to proceed to HDR, Inc., until design obligation has been received. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Professional Services Agreement with HDR, Inc. 2. Site Plan FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The 10% match for design (Preliminary Engineering) will be waived upon receipt of design obligation from WSDOT. STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent Agenda General Business Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with HDR, Inc. for design of the West Belfair Valley Road and Tracyton Beach Road Innovative Safety Projects; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action Form Updated 01/07/15 SCALE:1"=1200' VICINITY MAP CITY OF BREMERTON WEST BELFAIR VALLEY ROAD PROJECT LOCATIONPROJECT LOCATION SCALE:1"=1200' VICINITY MAP CITY OF BREMERTON TRACYTON BEACH ROAD PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION ONLY ITEM CITY OF BREMERTON B1 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 Briefing by Kitsap Building Association Presenter: Teresa Osinski, Executive Vice President Phone: (360) 479-5778 SUMMARY: KBA Mission: The Kitsap Building Association is an association of professional builders, subcontractors, service providers and purveyors representing the construction industry. The association provides information, education, and services that promote the health and welfare of the construction industry. As leaders of the industry, we foster safe, affordable housing, and promote economic development by advocating on behalf of the construction industry and the consumers that rely on it. Our Association seeks: To remain a proactive and positive influence in the legislative, regulatory, and civic arenas. To foster public awareness of the contribution the construction industry makes to our community. To encourage ethical conduct, good business practices, and professionalism among our members. To be recognized as an organization that promotes to its members and the community as a whole the importance of responsible management of natural resources. STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation Form Created 5/4/15 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON B2 CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Resolution No. Study Session Date: March 8, 2017 to accept and approve Annexation COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 15, 2017 Proceedings for territory adjacent to Department: DCD Corbet Drive Presenter: Allison Satter Phone: (360) 473-5845 SUMMARY: The City received a petition to annex on January 23, 2017. The petition method of annexation is accomplished with two steps, the fi must represent either 10% (first petition) or 60% (second petition) of assessed value or acreage of land. The proposed annexation uses the percentage of assessed value method. After being notified of the proposed annexation, the City Council must set a date within 60 days of receipt of the petition for a meeting with the initiating parties. The meeting is scheduled for March 15, 2017. At this meeting the City Council must determine: 1) Whether the city will accept, reject or modify the proposed annexation; 2) Whether it will require simultaneous adoption of a Comprehensive Plan; and 3) Whether it will require assumption of all or any portions of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. At the conclusion of the meeting on March 15, 2017, the City Council is expected to pass a resolution which will allow the annexation to move forward procedurally, and allows the gathering of signatures for the second step (60% petition). ATTACHMENTS: I. Resolution No. _______ which includes: Exhibit 1) Notice of Intention of Commence Annexation Proceeding; and Exhibit 2) List of Petitioners of the Outside Utility Agreements, and Exhibit 3) Map of Proposed Territory for Annexation Exhibit 4) Parcel Details for Territory Exhibit 5) Pre-Land Use Designation Map II. Corbet Drive Fiscal Analysis on Impacts of Annexation Attachment A) Potential Annexation Area Map Attachment B) Growth Assumptions Attachment C) Fiscal Impact of West Bremerton & Gorst UGA Report Attachment D) Rocky Point Handout Attachment E) Infrastructure Map FISCAL IMPACTS: A Fiscal Analysis on Potential Annexation impacts has been included into this packet as Attachment II STUDY SESSION AGENDA: No Presentation Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent Agenda General Business Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Resolution No. _____ accepting and approving annexation proceedings for territory adjacent to Corbet Drive. COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, accepting the proposal for annexation, affirming the adoption of pre-land use designation of this annexation area and requiring the assumption of all of the City's existing indebtedness by the area to be annexed and authorizing the circulation of a petition for annexation,. WHEREAS, on January 23, 2017, the City received a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings from owner of property at 1539 Corbet Drive as depicted in Exhibit 1; and WHEREAS, the City has Outside Utility Agreements for properties located in close proximity to 1539 Corbet Drive, as listed in Exhibit 2, which grants consent to annexation; and WHEREAS, the proposed area for annexation is identified on the map in Exhibit 3, and further described in Exhibit 4; and WHEREAS, the parties initiating the proposed annexation including Outside Utility Agreements for properties iating are owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in value of the property, according to the assessed valuation for which annexation is petitioned; and WHEREAS, the proposed area for annexation is located within the an Urban Grown Area (UGA); and WHEREAS, the City Council must meet with the Initiating Parties no later than 60 days after filing the request for annexation to consider the petition and decide whether it will 1) accept, reject, or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2) require the simultaneous adoption of the comprehensive plan for the area proposed to be annexed; and 3) require the assumption of all or any portion of City indebtedness by the area to be annexed; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 5299 passed on May 18, 2016, Comprehensive Plan (Plan) and established pre-annexation land use designations. The pre- designations are contained within the Land Use Element of this Plan in a table known as the equivalences for the Kitsap County Land Use designations; and WHEREAS, based on the Equivalence Table, the City established the Plan for the proposed annexation area as is Multifamily Residential (MR) and Low Density Residential (LDR 1 Annexation Corbet Drive WHEREAS, City Council has set March 15, 2017, as the date that it will meet with the Initiating Parties to consider the petition; and WHEREAS, City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City to accept the proposed annexation as presented, require the simultaneous adoption of the Plan for the area proposed to be annexed, and require the assumption of all or any portion of City indebtedness by the area to be annexed; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated by reference as set forth herein in full. SECTION 2. The Petition for Annexation of Territory to the City of Bremerton attached hereto as Exhibit 1, the List of Outside Utility Agreement properties included as Petitioners attached hereto as Exhibit 2, and the descriptions of the annexation area provided in Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 are hereby accepted as presented without any geographic modification to the area proposed to be annexed. SECTION 3. The City Council hereby affirms the adoption of pre-land use designation for this annexation area that the 2016 Comprehensive Plan established as Multifamily Residential (MR) and Low Density Residential (LDR) designations as shown in Exhibit 5. SECTION 4. The City Council shall require the assumption of all existing City indebtedness by the area to be annexed. SECTION 5. To proceed with the proposed annexation, the Initiating Parties shall be required to submit the appropriate petition to the City Council for consideration and further action all deemed appropriate pursuant to RCW 35.13.130. SECTION 6. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. \[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE\] 2 Annexation Corbet Drive PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this _____ day of __________________, 2017. _________________________________ ERIC YOUNGER, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: __________________________________ ________________________________ ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk R:\\Legal\\Legal\\Resolutions\\Community Development\\Annexation Corbet Dr. - 03.01.17.doc 3 Annexation Corbet Drive L A EE E MORA JO OLSEN T DENISE PATRICIAPATRICIAPATRICIA J RICHMAN CONSUELO C/O & M STEPHANIE L EVANSEVANSEVANS &&&LISA R TIFFANY LUCY UDAVE EEE &RR KYLENE & & INC & GUIZAR V TRUSTEE & Owner W L & ROBERTA RAYRAYRAY COLLEEN D INCINC L ENT & & LLC M DEVDEV ROBERT JERRY JAIRO MICHAEL ERIC CAROLINECAROLINE MARTIN WESLEY WEST Property CHRISTOPHER TREE JAMES THOMAS GARY CurrentSCHERFENBERGSCHERFENBERGFELTISWALDORFRAGANITRAGANITRUDDPOPPY DrSUNWARDDrSUNWARD CorbetCorbet DriveSKYLINE DR DriveCOOPERDriveRICHMANDriveNEYMAN DriveSCHERFENBERGDriveMILLERDriveMOMSENDriveNEESDriveFLADOOSDriveMORALES STST StreetStreet 17411741 ADDRESS CorbetCorbetCorbet19th19thandandCorbetCorbetCorbetCorbetCorbet5Crobet17THCORBET17THCorbet addressaddressAddress OUAsNoNo19111737174X174X174X17371710No1706 1756320132031737 LLL PARTNE1903 VOSHELVOSHELVOSHEL PETITIONERS NEWTON3014NEWTON3012 A NEES1743 s) OU BAIRD1517 EQUITY of SUSANSUSAN KIMBERLYKIMBERLYKIMBERLY && MVE BEEBE ROBERTA &&& NEWTON PINEOPINEO & & HARKINS NameTENNYSON & MOMSEN (OUA Filling No. File AGREEMENTS 9407130050SCHERFENBERG9407130050SCHERFENBERG9407130050SCHERFENBERG201408040068PROSERPINA9608190024LUCY9207150063TODD9208310063HILLDORNE9511030188BRUCE9511030188BRUCE200805050185GARY9507310126AARON950 7310126AARON9507310126AARON8006240022ALLEN9306210125MARY200711200088ROGER200711200087MICHAEL8110140060CLAYTON200711200085MICHAEL9502240043MARIE Auditor OUA UTILITY 0100AFN.0101AFN.0606AFN.0002AFN.0002AFN.0309AFN.0200AFN.2004AFN.2008AFN.2001AFN.0100AFN.0505AFN.0407AFN.2005AFN.0109AFN.0901AFN.1008AFN.0006AFN.0004AFN.2005AFN. 011010010010001001001186190189002003002193003003003001011201 11111 Number 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Parcel OUTSIDE OF 2378633786437865378693787 213787233787243787293787 1037871137871615240118152401201524012515240127378728378730375935375939152401 EXHIBITLIST City of Bremerton ¯ Area Proposed for Annexation 10% Petition March 2017 1 2 3 4 5 1 9 T H 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 19 Territory Proposed for 15 16 24 21 22 18 20 18T H Annexation 23 26 29 2728 2 30 31 32 33 34 35 1 7 T H 36 37 38 39 Legend Proposed Territory for Annexation Initial Petitioner Outside Utility Agreement (OUA) City Limits Urban Growth Area (UGA) 00.1Miles Parcel Detail Proposed for Annexation to the City of Bremerton Parcel 1 3786-000-010-0705 1919 Corbet Dr NW THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE SOUTH 260 FEET OF TRACT 10, AND THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE SOUTH 260 FEET OF THE EAST 66 FEET OF TRACT 11, PHINNEY BAY WATER FRONT TRACTS, LYING SOUTH OF BOND PROJECT NO. 13, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 OF PLATS, PAGE 17, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 2 3786-000-011-0100 - No Site Address BLK 000 LOT 11 D-01 '2' E 66FT OF S 260FT EX S 80FT & EX N 60FT OF S 140FT & EX N 60FT Parcel 3 3786-000-010-0101 - No Site Address BLK 000 LOT 10 D-01 '3' N 60FT OF S 200FT Parcel 4 3786-000-010-0606 1911 Corbet Dr NW BLK-000 LOT-10 D-06 1 N 60FT OF S 140FT BLK 000 LOT 11 N 60FT OF S 140FT OF E 66FT Parcel 5 3786-000-010-0002 1903 Corbet Dr NW THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF LOTS 10 AND 11, PHINNEY BAY WATER FRONT TRACTS, LYING SOUTH OF BEND PROJECT NO. 13, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 OF PLATS, PAGE 17, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 6 152401-1-213-2001 No Site Address LOT C, SHORT PLAT NO. 7224 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200307110206/0207, IN VOLUME 17 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 199. BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS DEPICTED ON THE SHORT PLAT. Parcel 7 152401-1-212-2002 1759 Corbet Dr NW LOT B, SHORT PLAT NO. 7224 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200307110206/0207, IN VOLUME 17 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 199, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS DEPICTED ON THE SHORT PLAT. Parcel 8 152401-1-211-2003 1763 Corbet Dr NW LOT A, SHORT PLAT NO. 7224 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200307110206/0207, IN VOLUME 17 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 199, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS DEPICTED ON THE SHORT PLAT. Parcel 9 3787-000-001-0002 1756 Corbet Dr NW THE WEST 175 FEET OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD PURPOSES. Parcel 10 th 3787-000-001-0309 3213 19 St. THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY'S 2 1/2 ACRE TRACT, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 175 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE EAST 60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 166.45 FEET; THENCE WEST 60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 166.45 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 11 th 3787-000-001-0200 3203 19 St. THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 235 EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1, BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING EAST 87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 166.45 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE WEST 87 FEET; THENCE NORTH TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET DEEDED TO KITSAP COUNTY, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 12 th 3787-000-001-0408 3193 NW 19 St. LOT A, SHORT PLAT NO. 5761, AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 9111010087/0088; BEING THE WEST 92.00 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5, OF PLATS, ON PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 322.00 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE SOUTH, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 1, TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 13 th 3787-000-001-0507 3183 19 St. LOT B SHORT PLAT 5761 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9111010087; BEING THE EAST 92.00 FEET OF THE WEST 184.00 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5, OF PLATS, ON PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 332.00 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE SOUTH, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 1, TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 14 th 3787-000-001-0606 3173 19 St. LOT C SHORT PLAT 5761 AS RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9111010087; BEING THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5, OF PLATS, ON PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 322.00 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 1; THENCE SOUTH, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 1, TO A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE WEST 184.00 FEET AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 15 152401-1-191-2007 No Site Address TH PTN NW1/4 NE1/4 DESC FOR TAX PURP ONLY AS FOLS, BAAP BEARING S0*16'52W 232.46FT FR N1/4 COR OF SEC 15 TH S0*16' 52W 100.45FT TH S89*50'59E 339.97FT TH NLY 166.45FT TH N89*50'46W 339.97FT TH S TO POB EXC E 122.90FT THOF & EXC W 30FT OF N 66FT THOF Parcel 16 152401-1-186-2004 1737 Corbet Dr NW THE EAST 122.90 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT BEARING SOUTH 0*16'52" WEST 166.46 FEET FROM THE NORTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 0*16'52" WEST 166.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89*50'59" EAST 339.975 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 166.45 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 39*50'46" EAST FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89*50'46" WEST 339.975 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS OF RECORD. Parcel 17 152401-1-187-2003 1747 Corbet Dr NW THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., I KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0*16'52 WEST 166.46 FEET AND SOUTH 89*50'46 EAST 679.97 FEET FROM QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 10 AND 15; THENCE NORTH 89*50'46 WEST 340 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0*16'52 WEST 60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89*50'46 EAST TO CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 60 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT EASTERLY 200 FEET THEREOF. TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER AND ACROSS THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING TRACT: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE OF CORBET DRIVE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0*16'52 WEST 166.46 FEET AND SOUTH 89*50'46 EAST 679.97 FEET FROM QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 10 AND 15; THENCE ALONG CENTERLINE OF SAID CORBET DRIVE, SOUTH 60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89*50'46 WEST 340 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0*16'52 WEST 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89*50'46' EAST 340 FEET TO CENTERLINE OF CORBET DRIVE; THENCE NORTH LONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CORBET DRIVE 106.45 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT CORBET DRIVE ON THE EAST SIDE THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 130 FEET THEREOF. SUBJECT TO: RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED MARCH 26, 1956, UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 63066. Parcel 18 152401-1-190-2008 1741 Corbet Dr NW THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE WESTERLY 140 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0*16'52" WEST 166.46 FEET AND SOUTH 89*50'46" EAST 679.97 FEET FROM QUARTER SECTION CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 10 AND 15; THENCE ALONG CENTERLINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SOUTH 60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89*50'46" WEST 340 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0*16'52" WEST 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89*50'46" EAST 340 FEET TO CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD 106.45 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS OF RECORD. Parcel 19 152401-1-188-2002 1745 Corbet Dr NW PT OF NW1/4 NE1/4 BAAP ON CEN LN OF CO RD WH BEARS S 0*16'52'' W 166.46FT & S 89*50'46'' E 679.97FT W FROM THE 1/4 SEC COR BET SEC 10 & 15 TH N 89*50'46'' W 200FT TH S 0*16'52'' W 60FT TH S 89*50'46 E 200FT TO CEN LN OF CO RD TH NLY ALG SD CEN LN 60FT TO POB EX THEREFROM CO RD ALG E LN TF Parcel 20 152401-1-189-2001 1743 Corbet Dr NW PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD WHICH BEARS S0*16'52 W 166.46 FEET AND S89*50'46 E 679.97 FEET, MORE OR LESS, FROM QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 10 AND 15, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD SOUTH 60 FEET TO TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N89*50'46 W 340 FEET; THENCE S0*16'52 W 106.45 FEET; THENCE S89*50'46 E 340 FEET TO CENTERLINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, 106.45 FEET TO TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT WEST 140 FEET AND EXCEPT PORTION FOR ROAD ON EAST SIDE. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 21 3787-000-002-0100 1736 Corbet Dr NW (LOT A SHORT PLAT NO 6066 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR FILE NO 9207290235, VOLUME 8, PAGE 109) BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 2, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KITSAP COUNTY BY DEED BEARING AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 948367; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 22 3787-000-002-0209 No Site Address LOT B SHORT PLAT NO. 6066 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9207290235; BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 2, PHINNEY 2-1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KITSAP COUNTY BY DEED BEARING AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 948367. PARCEL II: AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, AND UTILITIES OVER A PORTION OF THE NORTH 40 FEET OF LOT D OF SHORT PLAT NO. 6066 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9207290235. SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 23 3787-000-003-0505 1748 Corbet Dr NW RESULTANT PARCEL B OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 3070943, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT C SHORT PLAT NO 6066 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR FILE NO 9207290235, VOLUME 8, PAGE 109, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; >>ALSO THE EAST 200.00 FEET OF THE WEST 350.00 FEET OF LOT 3, PHINNEY 2-1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 24 3787-000-002-0407 1752 Corbet Dr NW (LOT D SHORT PLAT NO 6066 RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR FILE NO 9207290235, VOLUME 8, PAGE 109) BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 2, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KITSAP COUNTY BY DEED BEARING AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 948367; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 25 152401-1-193-2005 No Site Address THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE WEST 5 FEET TO KITSAP COUNTY; EXCEPT THE WEST HALF AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 900 PAGE 227 OF DEEDS. Parcel 26 3787-000-003-0208 1722 Corbet Dr NW THE WEST 150 FEET OF LOT 3, PHINNEY 2-1/2 ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 65 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 10 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KITSAP COUNTY FOR CORBET DRIVE BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 18, 1969, UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 949109. Parcel 27 3787-000-003-0109 1710 Corbet Dr NW A PORITON OF LOT 3, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY OF CORBET DRIVE, 65 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65 FEET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF LOT 3; THENCE WEST 150 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 28 3787-000-003-0901 No Site Address RESULTANT PARCEL A OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200805060002, AND AS CORRECTED BY AFFIDAVIT OF MINOR CORRECTION RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200805090057 AND 200806020156, AND AS DEPICTED ON SURVEY RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200806020157, IN VOLUME 70 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 212, BEING A RE- RECORDING OF AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200805060001, IN VOLUME 70 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 183, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 10, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF RESULTANT PARCEL A OF THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 3070943, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, C. JACK JONES ADDITION; THENCE NORTH 24*17'25" WEST 184.99 FEET, AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER KITSAP COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200805060001, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 3, PHINNEY 2 1/2 ACRE TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 1 AND THE TERMINATION OF THIS LINE; SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; SUBJECT TO A 25 FOOT WIDE ACCESS AND UTILITIES EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT 10, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, THE WEST LINE OF SAID 25 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT SHALL BE LENGTHENED ACCORDINGLY TO INTERSECT THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF RESULTANT PARCEL B OF THIS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT. Parcel 29 th 3787-000-003-1008 3014 17 St. RESULTANT PARCEL 1 OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200903300137, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: RESULTANT PARCEL B OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200805060002, AND AS CORRECTED BY AFFIDAVIT OF MINOR CORRECTION RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 200805090057 AND 200806020156, AND AS DEPICTED ON SURVEY RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200806020157, IN VOLUME 70 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 212, BEING A RE-RECORDING OF AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200805060001, IN VOLUME 70 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 183, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 32 FEET OF LOT 11, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 30 3759-000-001-0006 1706 Corbet Dr NW LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 31 th 3759-000-004-0003 3208 17 St. LOT 4 AND THE WEST 25 FEET OF LOT 5, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 32 3759-000-005-0002 No Site Address LOT 6 AND THE EAST ONE-HALF OF LOT 5 OF C. JACK JONES ADDITON, RECORDED IN VOLUME 6, PAGE 50 OF PLATS, KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 33 th 3759-000-007-0000 3030 17 St. BLK-000 LOT-007 D-00 ALL OF LOT 7 & W 25FT OF LOT 8 Parcel 34 th 3759-000-008-0009 3020 17 St. THE EAST 25 FEET OF LOT 8 AND ALL OF LOT 9, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY; SITUATE IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 35 th 3759-000-011-0004 3012 17 St. RESULTANT PARCEL 2 OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 200903300137, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 11, C. JACK JONES ADDITION, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 32 FEET THEREOF. Parcel 36 152401-1-205-2001 1539 Corbet Dr NW THE EAST 350 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Parcel 37 152401-1-195-2003 1525 Corbet Dr NW S1/2 N1/2 SW1/4 NW1/4 NE1/4 EXC W 1 AC Parcel 38 152401-1-200-2006 1523 Corbet Dr NW N1/2 N1/2 S1/2 SW1/4 NW1/4 NE1/4 EX RD EX W1/2 Parcel 39 152401-1-201-2005 1517 Corbet Dr NW RESULTANT PARCEL C OF BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 201512110075, RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST 158.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT CORBET DRIVE. City of Bremerton ¯ Area Proposed for Annexation Pre-Land Use Designation Map 1 2 3 4 5 1 9 T H 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 19 Territory Proposed for 15 16 24 21 22 18 20 18T H Annexation 23 26 29 2728 20 30 31 32 33 34 35 1 7 T H 36 37 38 39 Legend Low Density Residential (LDR) Proposed Territory for Annexation City Limits Urban Growth Area (UGA) 00.1Miles Fiscal Impacts of Annexation: Corbet Annexation March 2017 City of Bremerton Allison Satter, Senior Planner th 345 6 Street Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 (360) 473-5845 Allison.Satter@ci.bremerton.wa.us Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Table of Contents Project Overview ........................................................... 2 Potential Annexation Aerial ........................................... 3 Study Area ...................................................................... 4 Growth Planning Status .................................................. 4 Report Structure ............................................................. 4 General Annexation Discussion: ..................................... 5 Rocky Point Urban Growth Area .................................... 5 Annexation Method Petition Method ......................... 5 Request for Annexation & Outside Utility Agreements ............................... 6 Fiscal Impacts City Perspective .................................... 7 Cost and Benefits Rocky Point Resident Perspective ...................... 8 Community Character of the Proposed Annexation ...... 9 Land Use ......................................................................... 9 Housing and Population ............................................... 10 Assessed Valuation ....................................................... 10 Public / Open Space ...................................................... 10 Schools .......................................................................... 10 Infrastructure Overview ............................................... 11 Potable Water .............................................................. 11 Sanitary Sewer .............................................................. 11 Stormwater Infrastructure............................................ 11 Streets and Transportation ........................................... 11 Attachment A: Staff Proposed Study Area ................... 12 Attachment B: Growth Assumptions ........................... 13 Attachment C: Fiscal Impacts of West Bremerton & Gorst UGA Annexation ...... 14 Attachment D: Rocky Point Public Handout ................. Attachment E: Water & Sewer Map ............................. March 6, 2017 Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Project Overview This report was prepared for City Council Review in advance of the March 15, 2017 City Council meeting with annexation petitioners. The City has been asked to consider annexing a portion of the Rocky Point Urban Growth Area (UGA). This process began on January 23, 2017 when the City Clerk received a Petition to Annex from a single property owner pursuant to RCW 35.13.125 . This property proposed for annexation is adjacent to the City of Bremerton current limits. In addition to the single property owner petition, over recent years the City has extended utility services to nearby parcels and (OUAs). This means that in exchange for extending a public util water or sewer service) an agreement was signed stating that the owner of the property would not oppose a future annexation. The Corbet Annexation has been configured by Staff as shown on the following page based on the petitioner request and the Citys OUAs. Corbet Drive th 17 Street Subject Parcel March 6, 2017 City of Bremerton ¯ Area of Proposed Annexation 1 2 3 4 5 1 9 T H 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Territory Proposed for 17 19 Annexation 15 16 24 21 22 18 20 18T H 23 26 29 28 27 30 31 32 33 34 35 1 7 T H 36 37 38 39 Legend Territory Proposed for Annexation Initial Petitioner OUA Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, City Limits 00.12Miles CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Study Area The map on the previous page identifies the subject area that the City is considering for th annexation. The general boundaries of the study area are adjacent to Corbet Drive near 15, thth 17 and 19 Streets and this area is adjacent to current city limits. As an overview, this area is a relatively developed neighborhood of single family homes. There are some larger lots within the area that are undeveloped or have a single family home on a large lot that may choose to subdivide their property in the future. Growth Planning Status This Corbet Annexation is entirely within the City of Bremerton associated Rocky Point UGA and is contiguous to the City. This UGA it may be annexed at any time by Bremerton without challenge or dispute from other jurisdictions. 2016 Comprehensive Plan anticipated annexing this area during the 20-year time horizon of the Plan. Report Structure The purpose of this report is to summarize the following: Area proposed for annexation (Attachment A) Growth assumptions (Attachment B) Fiscal impacts of annexation (Attachment C) Share public information relevant to Rocky Point (Attachment D) Vicinity of City infrastructure (Attachment E) Attachment A: A map of potential annexation. Attachment B: As the City annexes territory, the City must consider both the existing population and the buildout potential. This attachment contains the figures data in this section are used for assessed value and future population growth. Attachment C: Fiscal Impacts of West Bremerton UGA and Gorst UGA Annexation. This attachment addresses the fiscal impacts of all West Bremerton UGAs: Navy Yard City, West Hills, Gorst and Rocky Point. City Council should consider the impacts to annexations comprehensively and in totality. This attachment provides the insight for City Council to determine the short and long-term impacts of annexing all the West Bremerton UGAs. The reader should understand that the proposed Corbet Annexation is only a small portion of this much more comprehensive look at annexation. Attachment D: Rocky Point Handout). This document contains public information regarding annexation benefits and impacts to a property owner. Attachment E: Vicinity Map of the sewer and water mains to assist the reader understanding where the capital infrastructure is located. March 6, 2017 Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis General Annexation Discussion: Rocky Point Urban Growth Area An important consideration is how the Corbet Annexation relates to the remaining portion of the Rocky Point Urban Growth Area. As of this time, the City is promoting annexations but is not the initiating party for annexation. The City is seeking interested owners within UGAs to request annexation. In Spring 2017, Staff will be proceeding with educational outreach processes to each UGA to assist the public with any annexation questions and gauge public interest in annexations. The Corbet proposal is to annex a small portion of the Rocky Point UGA; the remaining peninsula of UGA is not be proposed for annexation at this time. Please also note that Kitsap County is not like to see Bremerton annex the Rocky Point UGA as it is surrounded by City of Bremerton limits. The proposed annexation of a portion of the Rocky Point UGA does not further create more impact to Kitsap County. Annexation Method Petition Method There are nine methods of annexation pursuant to state law, and the Corbet Annexation utilizes The petition method of annexation is accomplished with two steps: Step 1 Step 2 quirement that the signatures on the petitions must represent the requisite percentage of either assessed value or acreage of land. One of the primary purposes of the two step process is first for the City Council to meet with the initiating petitioners and determine if the City will accept, reject, or modify the proposed annexation. Once the City Council sets the geographical boundaries for the annexations signatures are gathered for the finalizing petition (60%). The first step is the only time that the City Council may make modifications to the area that is proposed for annexation. The City must ensure that annexations have logical boundaries. The Corbet Annexation is at step 1 of the petition process, and the City Council will be meeting with petitioners on March 15, 2017. Following this meeting, the Council will decide to accept, reject, or modify the annexation. consideration to establish a logical boundary for this proposed annexation; this will be a modification from the original annexation petition that was received. The boundaries that City staff have proposed for the Corbet Annexation are described in more detail in the next section. March 6, 2017 Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Request for Annexation & Outside Utility Agreements The City received a petition to annex on January 23, 2017. Upon receipt of that request to annex, Staff reviewed City records to find OUAs in close proximity to the property requesting annexation. Staff strategically utilized a portion of the existing OUAs to enlarge the annexation geography to the greatest extent feasible while designing a logical City limit boundary. OUA documents previously executed between the City and property owners state that in exchange for the extension of a public utility to a property (eg. water or sewer service) the owner of that property agrees to support a future annexation. The OUA is a legal document that runs with the land, and is on file with the City of Bremerton and the Kitsap County recording power of attorney clause. Previous legal precedent confirms that OUAs may be substituted as a signature on annexation petitions by the owner of the property, even if the current owner is different than those who signed the agreement. Staff believes that the proposed annexation geography makes the most effective use of concentrations of OUAs. March 6, 2017 Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Fiscal Impacts City Perspective The City Council desires to move forward with annexation for all the UGAs. Before undertaking any annexation, the City must consider the 20-year vision of annexation, including fiscal impacts. The City of Bremerton has developed a Fiscal Impacts of West Bremerton UGA and Gorst UGA 1 Annexation which can be seen in Attachment C. The current petition for annexation is to bring . The total acreage of the West Bremerton UGA is 1,530 AC. The Corbet Annexation, as configured by Staff, is 23.6 AC (1.5% of the West Bremerton UGAs). The table below is an excerpt from Attachment C (page 11). This has been provided for the reader to see the total West Bremerton UGAmpacts for 2017, 2020, and 2032. This report has assumed that 1.5% of the total impacts identified in the table above can be attributed to the Corbet Annexation. Here are the calculations to show the proportionate share of the total West Bremerton UGA cost/benefits: Corbet Drive Annexation 2017 2020 2032 Net Resources ($2,895) $8,040 $3,840 1 As the Fiscal Impacts of West Bremerton UGA and Gorst UGA Annexation was completed in 2015, the data used for this report was the 2014 and 2015 budget and documents. However, after reviewing the 2016 and 2017 budgets, Staff has determined that there were no considerable structural changes between these budgets. For this reason, the City would not expect significant differences in planning-level results of the study and is comfortable with continuing to use this data as a basis for this analysis. City financial Staff confirmed the reasonableness of this assumption. March 6, 2017 Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Cost and Benefits Rocky Point Resident Perspective An informational handout has beencreated to help the residents identify the impactsof annexations. This handout was developed utilizing information from the Fiscal Impacts of West Bremerton UGA and Gorst UGA Annexation. This handout has been included as Attachment D. Attachment D is based on three categories of cost that a property owner may be impacted by. Those include the following: (1) Property taxes; (2) Utility Services cost, fees and taxes; and (3) Transportation Benefit District (car tabs). Property Taxes: Property Tax rates between the City and County area is less than 3% difference. Part of property taxes include any capital bonds or levies. In 2015, the City of Bremerton voters passed the Fire capital bond by 71.1%. This bond will generate $4.5M for fire engines, a ladder truck, two ambulances and other vehicle and firefighting equipment. It also will remodel two fire stations to outfit them with fire sprinklers and create specialized facilities for both men and women. Property taxes increase by 22 cents per thousand dollars of assessed property values. Upon annexation the recommendation is for this Fire capital bond to be extended the annexed territory. Utility Service Cost: Most residents already using City water and sewer utilities will cease to pay out-of-city surcharges, so they will see some savings. Other differences include: the City shows storm water utility charges as a separate line item on the utility bill whereas the County includes it in taxes; and the City requires garbage collection service while the County does not. Transportation Benefit District: Transportation Benefit District (TBD) is used to improve and Kitsap County does not have a TBD, and the City does. The handout has assumed each household has two cars, thus an additional fee of $40 per year if annexed. Summary of Cost: Attachment D shows that an average assessed property value of $240,000 could expect to pay an additional cost of $143 a year, or less than $12 a month. March 6, 2017 Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Community Character of the Proposed Annexation The following documents the overall character and existing conditions in the proposed area. Land Use The area is approximately 23.6 acres and is predominantly developed with single family homes. An important part of the annexation process is to establish an adopted City Comprehensive Plan land use for the territory that will be annexed. The following describes what the City has done to prepare that land use designation. nated the area with two land uses: Urban Medium and High Density Residential (UMHDR) Urban Low Density Residential (ULDR) would annex during the 20-year plan horizon, and in this adopted plan the City predesignated all land uses within our UGAs. The City believed that by pre-designating the land use with the to the City and individuals would be fully informed about what land use designation they would receive after annexation. be as follows: Kitsap County UMHDR will become C (LDR) City: Kitsap: LDR ULDR Kitsap: City: LDR March 6, 2017 Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Housing and Population The City and County Department of Community Development have witnessed increased development pressure within the region. As for this area, most of the undeveloped area (approximately 6 acres) may contain some wetland features and moderate geological hazardous area (slopes) that make development more challenging, but the strength of the housing market is making these areas viable for development. In total, the estimated existing population of the study area is 69 people and at full buildout, the City could expect 156 people. Assessed Valuation The total assessed valuation of land and structures in the area in 2017 is $6.2M. As shown in Attachment B, the total assessed value of existing buildings is $4.8M, and the total assessed value of the land is $1.5M. Public / Open Space Within a short distance from the potential annexation area, there is an existing City Neighborhood Park: Haddon Park (picture to the right). This park was established in 1987 and is about 3.09 acres. This park includes a play area, perimeter pathway, restrooms and open lawn. It is well-used and provides passive and active recreation opportunities. Schools School district boundaries are typically a major concern for residents. Municipal annexations do not modify school district boundaries. March 6, 2017 Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Infrastructure Overview Attachment E is a map that shows the City of Bremerton installed infrastructure, including water and sewer mains. The following is information regarding the potential annexation and its infrastructure. Potable Water The potential annexation area is serviced by City of Bremerton water infrastructure. A water main runs through the potential annexation area. Little or no additional public investment would be required to service this area with water. As development occurs within this area with subdivisions, private developers will be responsible for extending the water system for their projects. Sanitary Sewer Sanitary Sewer service is available for the potential annexation area. As development occurs within this area with subdivisions, private developers will be responsible for extending the collection system for their projects. Stormwater Infrastructure Most streets in the vicinity have not been developed with integrated curb and gutter systems. Future public investment would be required to bring the Stormwater system up to the City of Bremerton standards in future years. Streets and Transportation The existing network of streets in the study area is operating well within City of Bremerton service capacity levels. Corbet Drive is the key arterial street running through the study area and this road has further capacity for services. As development occurs within this area with subdivisions or multifamily housing, private developers will be responsible for contributing to any necessary transportation improvements March 6, 2017 City of Bremerton ¯ Area Proposed for Annexation 10% Petition March 2017 1 2 3 4 5 1 9 T H 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 17 19 Territory Proposed for 15 16 24 21 22 18 20 18T H Annexation 23 26 29 2728 2 30 31 32 33 34 35 1 7 T H 36 37 38 39 Legend Proposed Territory for Annexation Initial Petitioner Outside Utility Agreement (OUA) City Limits Urban Growth Area (UGA) 00.1Miles Corbet Drive Annexation Fiscal Analysis Attachment B: Growth Assumptions Corbet Annexation Feb 2017 Existing & Projected Buildout Data Existing Conditions (2017) Projected Buildout (2037) Units Single Family 30 68 Units Multi Family 0 0 Commercial GSF 0 0 Number Operating 0 0 Businesses Estimated Total 69 156 Population Total Parcels (Lots) 39 68 Lots Sewered 13 51 Lots City Water 18 68 Total Acres (Taxable 20 20 Property) Total 6 2 Undeveloped/Open Acreage Total Assessed $4,822,860 $13,866,860 Value Buildings Total Assessed $1,457,180 $1,457,180 Value Land Total Assessed $6,280,040 $15,324,040 Value Assumptions / Sources 1. Kitsap County Assessor Records checked against aerial photo for unit counts. 2. 2.3 persons/household assumed. Figure suggested for use by OFM for Kitsap. 3. Gross Density of 6 DU / Acre assumed for remainder infill development lots. 4. All future buildout lots assumed to have water and sewer. 5. Average 2016 assessed value of single family home is applied to all units at buildout. 6. All dollar figures in 2017 dollars. March 6, 2017 CITY OF BREMERTON FISCAL IMPACTS OF WEST BREMERTON UGA AND GORST UGA ANNEXATION FINAL: AUGUST 5, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Purpose ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area Description ......................................................................................... 1 1.3 Document Organization ........................................................................................ 2 1.4 Approach and Methodology.................................................................................. 3 1.5 Data Sources .......................................................................................................... 4 2.0 ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................................ 6 2.1 General Assumptions ............................................................................................ 6 2.2 Development Assumptions ................................................................................... 6 3.0 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS ....................................................................... 8 3.1 Baseline Budget Assumptions (No Annexation) ................................................. 8 3.2 Annexation is Estimated to Provide a Net Fiscal Benefit to the City ................. 9 4.0 SHORT-TERM ANNEXATION IMPACTS ....................................................... 10 4.1 Short-term Operating Revenue Impacts ............................................................ 10 4.2 Short-Term Operating Cost Impacts .................................................................. 14 4.3 Short-Term Capital Impacts ................................................................................ 17 5.0 LONG-TERM ANNEXATION IMPACTS ......................................................... 21 5.1 Long-Term Operating Impacts ............................................................................ 21 5.2 Long-Term Capital Impacts ................................................................................. 21 APPENDIX A: GORST PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE LAND USE MAP ................. 27 1.0INTRODUCTION 1.1STUDY PURPOSE The City of Bremerton is considering annexation of the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), and this analysis was conducted to assist the City in assessing the fiscal implications of such an annexation. In 2014 a separate analysis was completed evaluating potential annexation of the Gorst UGA; this assessment differs from the 2014 analysis in that it combines the impact of annexing all four areas at the same time. The purpose of the analysis is to give the City an understanding of specific incremental fiscal impacts costs and revenues of such an annexation during the first five years after annexation. In addition, the City is interested in potential long-term fiscal impacts of annexation. This analysis assesses high-level potential impacts over the next 20 years to identify long-term risks, opportunities, and uncertainties the City of Bremerton should consider. 1.2STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION In 2014, the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs had a population of approximately 4,900 residents and an estimated 630 jobs. The four Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) are shown in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1: Potential Annexation Areas Map Source: Kitsap County, 2014; BERK, 2015. Navy Yard City UGA. The Navy Yard City is the largest of the four areas in terms of population and employment, with approximately 2,600 residents and an estimated 370 jobs in 2014. Rocky Point UGA. Rocky Point UGA is primarily residential, with a population of approximately 1,560 residents. West Hills UGA. In 2014, West Hills UGA had a population of approximately 480 residents and an estimated 15 jobs. Gorst UGA. In 2010, the Gorst UGA had a population of 222 residents and an estimated 237 jobs. Under the Preferred Alternative from the Gorst Subarea Plan developed in 2013, the UGA is planned to evolve into a complete community with places to live, play, shop, and work in a waterfront setting. Mixed uses would be allowed through much of the UGA. The waterfront area would allow lower intensity commercial uses with smaller impervious footprints interspersed by trails, parks, and reclaimed shoreline habitat. Under this alternative the UGA is assumed to add 1,060 people and 298 additional jobs by 2035. For a map that shows the future zoning of Gorst under the Preferred Alternative, please refer to Appendix A. 1.3DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION This document includes the following sections: Assumptions Short-Term Impacts Long-Term Impacts 2.0 Study Approach. This section introduces the approach and methodology of this study, and provides some additional background information in the purpose of the analysis. 3.0 Summary of Key Findings. This section presents the high-level findings around net fiscal impact of the annexation. 4.0 Short-Term Annexation Impact. This section presents the detailed findings for operating costs and revenues and capital costs and revenues for the first five years after annexation. 5.0 Long-Term Annexation Impacts. This section presents a high-level consideration of how the annexation may impact the City over the next 20 years. Appendix A. Gorst UGA Preferred Alternative Future Land Use Map. 1.4APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY This report presents planning-level operating cost and revenue estimates of annexing the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs into the City of Bremerton over the next five and twenty years. The report also addresses capital impacts of annexation including capital facility needs and capital revenue estimates. High-Level Planning Document It is important to note that this is a financial planning study and not a budget development exercise. The analysis is intended to provide a reasonable estimate of potential costs and revenues associated with annexation and to allow for the development and evaluation of alternative scenarios to test the implications of development assumptions, policy choices, and alternative service delivery options, to help the City determine how to proceed with the potential annexation of these areas. If the City proceeds with annexation, this analysis provides a basis from which the City can begin the process of planning for the higher service demands of a slightly larger city. However, the actual implementation will be accomplished through the regular budget process wherein City management will revisit the balance of costs and revenues in light of updated information and the overall needs of the City at that time. In addition, staffing projections used in this analysis are the best estimates given current information. The City will need to determine exact staffing levels for each department if annexation becomes a reality. There will likely be a transition phase as new staff are hired and trained, which can include substantial lead time. The number of personnel needed and the timing of hiring by position will have to be planned to a greater level of detail than was necessary for this planning-level analysis. 2014 Base Year Budget BERK started this study in mid-2014, and due to timing, used the 2014 City of Bremerton budget as a basis for building the baseline fiscal model. The preliminary draft results were submitted to City staff in late 2014. The City has since finalized the 2015 budget; however, after reviewing both 2014 and 2015 budgets, BERK determined that there were no considerable structural changes between these budgets. For this reason, BERK would not expect significant differences in planning-level results of the study and is comfortable with continuing to use 2014 as a basis for the analysis. finance staff, who confirmed the reasonableness of this assumption. Analysis Considers City With and Without Annexation To be an effective decision support tool, the analysis cannot consider fiscal impacts by looking just at the annexation areas alone, but instead must consider the potential impacts of annexation by comparing the fiscal outlook for the City of Bremerton under two alternative futures: (1) the future of the current City with boundaries unchanged and (2) the future of a larger version of the City that includes annexation of the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs. Analysis of these two alternative futures provides a truly comprehensive look at the potential implications of annexation on long-term fiscal sustainability. Land-Based Fiscal Model BERK developed an annexation fiscal model to estimate revenues and expenses for both the existing City and a post-annexation City. Taking the analysis into the future shows how the fiscal balance in the City might change over time and how annexation might affect the long-term fiscal outlook for the new, larger City. Ongoing Costs and Revenues The fiscal model estimates changes in the cost of services based on relationships between direct services, such as maintenance workers or planners, and underlying demographic and community changes, such as increases in population, housing units, commercial activity, and land area. Costs are separately estimated for labor and non-labor categories: Labor costs are based on current salaries and benefits and an assumed annual escalation rate. Non-labor costs in each department are driven by the current relationships between the number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) in that department and the magnitude of non-labor costs in that department. Non-labor costs that are unrelated to the positions in a department (such as facilities maintenance, which is related to the size of a building, or street lighting costs, which are related to lane miles) are separated from the department costs and estimated based on relevant cost drivers. The analysis of operating impacts focuses solely on the general and street funds, as these are the primary operating funds for the City. Enterprise funds, whose operations are generally self-supporting through user fees, are not addressed as part of the operating impact analysis. Capital Cost and Revenue The capital impact analysis includes capital costs from all City departments, including the enterprise funds, to capture all capital needs in the potential annexation areas. The capital revenue analysis focuses on general capital revenues, primarily the Real Estate Excise Tax. 1.5DATA SOURCES Data used in this report came from the following sources: City of Bremerton o City of Bremerton Budget, 2014 o Staffing detail, including position titles, FTEs, salary and benefit costs, 2014 o Bremerton Annexation of Gorst UGA Memo, 2014 o Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013 o Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement, 2013 o White Paper: Rocky Point Assumption Issues, 2014 o Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Capital Improvement Program Overview, 2014 o Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Water System Plan Update, 2012 o Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014 o Bremerton Parks Department, Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2014 Kitsap County o Kitsap County Assessor, Parcel data, 2014 o Kitsap County, Buildable lands data, 2014 o Kitsap County Assessor, Personal property tax revenue, 2012 o Kitsap County GIS, Parcel and street layer, 2014 o Kitsap County, UGA Sizing & Composition Remand Final Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2012 o Kitsap County Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2012 o Kitsap County Public Works, Navy Yard City Sewer CFP 2015-2020, 2014 o Kitsap County Public Works, Sewer Utility Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019 o Kitsap County Public Works, Solid Waste Division Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019 o Kitsap County Public Works, Surface and Stormwater Plan Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014- 2019 o Kitsap County Public Works, Transportation Six-Year Improvement Program 2015-2020 Puget Sound Regional Council o 2014 employment Washington State Department of Revenue o 2013 taxable retail sales Washington State Office of Financial Management o 2014 population o 2014 housing units 2.0ASSUMPTIONS 2.1GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS General Assumptions The analysis assumes that the City of Bremerton annexes the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs into the City in 2016. The analysis assumes annexation related costs and revenues accrue on an annual basis beginning in 2016. All analysis presented in this document is based on annual estimates. Actual impacts from annexation in any specific year will depend on the effective date of the annexation. Impacts in this document should be considered planning-level estimates for the City to understand the direction and magnitude of likely impacts. Escalation Assumptions. The analysis assumes a general inflation rate of 3.0% annually. Staff salaries are escalated at 2.0% annually. Benefits are assumed to grow at 6.5% per year in most years, with the following exception: benefits are assumed to jump by 15% in 2018 due to Affordable Care Act implementation rules regarding health plans. 2.2DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS The analysis is built on the premise that key factors in the land base (such as population, employment, and commercial activity) drive both demand for serv regarding fiscal and taxing policy (limited by tax laws). The BERK fiscal analysis framework is flexible and allows for varying assumptions about anticipated development in the City and annexation areas over time, and how these changes affect the underlying local tax base. In particular, the following elements are explicitly specified: (1) development assumptions including type, scale, and timing of new development; (2) type and mix of tenants, associated employment, and business income levels; (3) housing mix (single-family and multi-family) and density; and (4) productivity of new retail activity. development activity similar to that seen historically. Development assumptions for the potential annexation areas are described below. Exhibit 2 summarizes the population and employment projections that underlie the cost and revenue estimates in this study. The first column shows the current estimated housing units, population, and employment within the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs. The subsequent columns show the estimated housing units, population, and employment in the UGA boundaries over time. Exhibit 2. Development Metrics for Potential Annexation Areas (2014-2031) 20142016202120262031AAGR 2014-2031 Navy Yard City Housing Units1,3321,3651,4471,5291,6111% Population2,6132,7272,9163,1053,2941% Est. Employment3744355977769746% Rocky Point Housing Units7347648399159902% Population1,5571,6641,8432,0222,2012% Est. Employment22222- West Hills Island Housing Units2092302823343874% Population4805546798039274% Est. Employment1515151515- Gorst Housing Units10610714126852010% Population2222343115731,04010% Est. Employment2372372753424284% Total All Potential Annexation Areas Housing Units2,3812,4662,7103,0463,5082% Population4,8725,1795,7486,5037,4623% Est. Employment6286898891,1351,4195% Source: Kitsap County, 2014; BERK, 2015. Gorst. These development assumptions are based on the adopted Preferred Alternative in the 2013 Gorst Subarea Plan, which designated long-term growth targets for 2035. Interim years are interpolated based on conversations with planners and City staff, and give a conceptual representation of the pace at which the UGA may develop to reach its long-term targets. Immediately upon annexation in 2016, the City of Bremerton will add to its boundaries the 107 housing units, 234 residents, and approximately 237 jobs in the Gorst UGA. By 2021 units, 311 residents, and approximately 275 jobs. All of this activity would be located within the new boundaries of the City of Bremerton. Based on the Gorst Subarea Plan, this fiscal analysis assumes that Gorst will grow to approximately 520 housing units, 1,040 residents, and approximately 428 jobs by 2031. Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, and West Hills. Since a detailed subarea plan has not been developed for these subareas, development assumptions for this model were based on assuming similar build-out rates for these PAAs as for the Gorst subarea. Therefore, of the available capacity in each subarea, the same percentage of available residential and commercial capacity was assumed to be built out by 2035 in all four subareas. The driving assumption was the implicit build-out percentage from the Gorst Subarea Plan Preferred Alternative. 3.0SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS This section provides a brief overview of the key findings of how annexation of the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs will impact the City of Bremerton, based on the conceptual development assumptions identified above. This section quantifies the impacts for both operating costs and revenues as the City transitions through the annexation. Short-term impacts, defined as 2016-2020, are explained in more detail in Section 4.0. Longer-term impacts of annexation (after 2020) are described in Section 5.0. 3.1BASELINE BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS (NO ANNEXATION) While all cities across the state are different in terms of tax bases, mixes of commercial and residential land uses, and fiscal policies, almost all cities face structural challenges in local government funding that have led to the cost of municipal services growing at faster rates than tax and fee revenues. This creates an ongoing budget challenge for cities to maintain adequate levels of service without changing tax and fee policies. The most significant contributors to this underlying structural challenge have been the result of two voter approved initiatives: 1.Initiative 695, which was passed by voters in 1999, reduced Motor Vehicle Excise Tax rates to a flat $30 fee. A portion of these revenues were used to support sales tax equalization payments that were a significant funding source for many cities with lower than average sales tax collections. 2.Initiative 747 (and subsequent legislative action to restore the provisions of the Initiative after it was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in November 2007) limits growth in property taxes to 1% per year, without voter approval. The effect of this change was to reduce the rate of growth in property tax revenues, which is one of the three most important sources of local government funding, to a rate that, in most cases, is lower than general inflation. The 1% limit does not apply to the value of new construction. As a result, a projection of revenues and costs that assumes no change in current policies (tax or level- of-service) suggests the City of Bremerton can expect to face budget deficits in the coming years. This finding is consistent with the common fiscal challenge in most other cities in Washington State and is principally related to the impact of rising costs of doing business and additional staffing related to in-city growth needed to maintain existing levels of service. Since a city cannot operate with a budget deficit, the Bremerton City Council will make choices each budget cycle to bring cost and revenue growth into alignment and maintain a balanced budget every year. When analyzing annexation, it is important to consider that the way in which the City chooses to address any baseline operating deficits may change the potential impacts of annexation. For example, if the City were to consider raising business or residential taxes to close the gap, the different tax rates would change revenues expected from the annexation areas based on the individual land base in those areas. If the approach were to reduce costs by modifying levels of service, then these revised levels of service would reduce costs associated with annexation in different proportions, again based on the land base and the corresponding demand for services. future budgets, and the City does not need to make those decisions at this time. Since the goal of this annexation study is to evaluate the incremental fiscal impacts of a potential annexation, it analyzes a scenario which assumes continuing current policies. This results in a long-term outlook that shows increasing budget deficits. These long-term deficits represent the structural imbalance between municipal cost and revenue growth rates. In reality, the City will balance its budget in any given year. 3.2ANNEXATION IS ESTIMATED TO PROVIDE A NET FISCAL BENEFIT TO THE CITY The key finding of this analysis is that the annexation of the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs will have a slight negative impact in the short-term to the City of Bremerton, and a moderate annual benefit in the medium- to long-term. A high-level picture of this finding is shown in Exhibit 3. Exhibit 3 Estimated Long Term Net Fiscal Impact of Annexation Source: BERK, 2015. Note: This Exhibit if no changes were made to policies that impact costs and revenues. In reality, the City Council will balance its budget each year. This table represents the impact that the Navy Yard City, Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst UGAs current cost and revenue structures. The Exhibit shows that in the near term there may be a slight negative impact, as the City may need to hire some staff before the full revenue impacts of the UGA are realized. In addition, the near term figures include impact of potential property tax and sales tax revenue sharing with Kitsap County (approximately $785,000 in 2017; see Section 4.1 for more information). The short-term and long-term impacts on revenues and costs are described in more detail in the following sections. Specific decisions around long-term service decisions for police and fire services may change the long-term impact. 4.0SHORT-TERM ANNEXATION IMPACTS 4.1SHORT-TERM OPERATING REVENUE IMPACTS Exhibit 4 shows short-term estimated revenues that would accrue to the City of Bremerton from annexation of the Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs), assuming annexation in 2016. All analysis presented in this document is based on annual estimates. Actual impacts from annexation in any specific year will depend on the effective date of the annexation. This analysis of operating impacts only includes revenues for the General Fund and Street Fund. Exhibit 4 Annual Annexation Revenue Impacts, 2016-2020 (Assuming 2016 Annexation Year) Operating Revenues20162017201820192020 Revenues not assuming any revenue sharing Sales Tax629,000665,000698,000735,000777,000 Criminal Justice Tax60,00063,00066,00068,00072,000 Property Tax/Road Levy01,088,0001,128,0001,168,0001,209,000 Leasehold Excise Tax00000 Utility Taxes296,000312,000330,000347,000368,000 Commercial Parking Tax00000 Gambling Tax00000 Solid Waste Franchise Fee19,00020,00021,00022,00023,000 Building Permits and Fees57,00059,00061,00063,00065,000 Business Licenses and Permits11,00012,00013,00014,00015,000 EMS Levy0191,000192,000192,000193,000 Liquor Board Profits and Excise Tax52,00054,00056,00059,00061,000 Gas Tax104,000106,000108,000110,000113,000 Planning and Plan Check Fees23,00024,00024,00025,00026,000 Municipal Court Costs61,00063,00065,00067,00069,000 Fines and Forfeits134,000140,000147,000153,000161,000 Recreation Charges(13,000)(13,000)(11,000)(10,000)(9,000) Grants and Other Intergovernmental108,000113,000119,000124,000129,000 Other Charges29,00031,00032,00033,00035,000 B&O Tax000329,000329,000 Police Services and Ambulance Transport Fees68,00071,00074,00076,00079,000 Internal Charges for Service00000 Total1,638,0002,999,0003,123,0003,575,0003,715,000 Potential Impacts of Revenue Sharing (472,000)(333,000)(174,000)00 Loss in Sales Tax Revenue Loss in Property Tax Revenue0(451,000)(312,000)(161,000)0 Total After Revenue Sharing1,166,0002,215,0002,637,0003,414,0003,715,000 Source: City of Bremerton, 2014; and BERK, 2015. Exhibit 4 provides two different pictures of the level of revenue the City may receive from annexation. The top portion of the table shows the full level of revenue that would be generated by the PAAs. The bottom portion of the table provides a picture of how revenues may accrue to the City if the City were to sign a revenue sharing agreement with Kitsap County to mitigate the impacts of annexation on the s. Such an agreement would only be put in place if the interlocal method of annexation were used. Currently, the City is not subject to a revenue sharing agreement with Kitsap County. However, for the purpose of providing a conservative fiscal analysis, the revenue estimates assume that the City may choose to participate in revenue sharing. The 2020 revenue impacts shown in Exhibit 4 reflect a stable picture of the PAAs going forward, given the assumption that any potential revenue sharing agreements with Kitsap County would be completed by 2020. In 20203.7 million in revenue from the annexation of these areas. This amount would grow going forward based on inflation as well as increased development in the UGA as services are built out. Operating Revenue Detail This section describes the methodology used to estimate the primary revenue items described above. Primary Revenue Sources As with many cities in Washington State, the three largest revenue sources for the City of Bremerton are Sales Tax, Property Tax, and Utility Taxes (including Payments In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT)), which make up approximately 60% of the 2014 general and street fund operating revenues. Additionally, the City levies a Business & Occupation (B&O) tax that is a significant revenue contributor, although the City is working to reduce this source of revenue over time. Sales Tax. Taxable retail sales are assumed to increase by 0.5% per year more than the general inflation rate of 3.0% used in this analysis. If the City entered a revenue sharing agreement with Kitsap County to offset the impact to the County of losing the UGA, this analysis assumes the City would receive 25% of sales tax revenues generated in the UGA in 2016, 50% in 2017, 75% in 2018, and 100% of revenues thereafter. Any actual revenue sharing agreement would be negotiated with the County and may vary from these assumptions. Property Tax. The property tax revenue (the amount that the City can collect) is limited to 1% or IPD (Implicit Price Deflator), whichever is lower, above the previous year collections plus a levy on the value of new construction. In future years, the base assessed value in the City and annexation areas is expected to increase at a rate of 2% (0.5% below inflation). Additional assessed value will be added to the area through residential and commercial development. If the City entered a revenue sharing agreement with Kitsap County to mitigate the impacts of annexation on th with the County using the same ratios as described above for sales tax. The timing of annexation will impact when the City begins to collect the property tax levy from the PAAs. Collections would only begin in 2017 if the City annexes the UGA early in 2016. Utility Tax and PILOT. Utility taxes for telephone, gas, cable, electricity, and garbage are assumed to grow based on the combination of population and employment in the PAAs. Current rates of these utility revenues relative to population and employment in the City of Bremerton were applied to assumed population and employment totals in the UGA to estimate utility revenues generated within the UGA. The City utility systems transfer Payments In Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) to the General Fund. PILOT payments include water, wastewater, and stormwater systems and are charged to the utility as a percentage of the total revenue from all customers. These revenues are similar to utility taxes and are projected in a similar fashion. The City already provides water service within Gorst, Navy Yard City, and West Hills, and charges a 50% surcharge for these customers since they are outside city limits. Rocky Point currently has its own water district, although the water is purchased from the City of Bremerton; this study assumes that the Rocky Point Water District would be absorbed into the City upon annexation. Therefore, annexation of these UGAs would result in a decrease in revenues from these customers to the utilities. This will subsequently result in a decrease in PILOT revenues to general and street funds (approximately $95,000 in 2016). Business & Occupation Tax. City of Bremerton is slowly reducing its dependency on B&O taxes as a major revenue source by increasing the total Gross Business Income (GBI) exemption by $20,000 per year until the tax is no longer collected (Bremerton Municipal Code 3.48.050(2)(b)). In 2015, this exemption is at $120,000. Due to this provision, B&O tax receipts have generally stayed flat over the last several years. To account for this going forward, B&O revenues for both the City and the annexation areas are projected to stay at current levels throughout the timeframe of this analysis, effectively reducing the real value over time. In addition, business in the PAAs annexation. Therefore, B&O tax revenues are assumed to begin accruing to the City in 2019. For existing Gross Business Incom apply, since the majority of business activity in Gorst comes from the retail sector. This tax rate is 0.125%. For the increase in GBI from development within the UGA, this analysis uses an effective tax rate of 0.1625% to account for exemptions and varying rates based on types of businesses. This effective rate the City. Other Revenue Sources The City receives revenue from many other sources, as described below. Criminal Justice Tax. Kitsap County levies a dedicated sales tax to support criminal justice expenditures. This 0.1% sales tax is collected by the state Department of Revenue, and is distributed to counties and cities on a per capita basis. In 2014, Bremerton estimates per capita criminal justice sales tax revenue at approximately $11.04 per capita. Future revenues are calculated on a per capita basis, with the annual per capita revenue assumed to increase at the rate of inflation. Solid Waste Franchise Fee. The Solid Waste provider in the City pays a franchise fee for providing this service within the City limits. These revenues are projected on a per capita basis and are estimated to be $3.51 per resident in 2014. These fees are assumed to extend into the PAAs upon annexation. Building Permits and Fees, and Planning and Plan Check Fees. These fees help cover the cost of staff that review building plans and permit applications for residents. Since the City does not set its fees on a strict cost recovery basis, these revenues are estimated on a per capita and per job basis, and are assumed to increase both with inflation as well as with increases in population and employment. Business Licenses and Permits. The City of Bremerton charges a fee to obtain a business license within the city limits. These revenues are projected based on the ratio of total employment in the City and the annexation areas. Annual employment estimates are generated from land use and development assumptions within the model. EMS Levy. The City of Bremerton is currently authorized by voters to levy an Emergency Medical Services tax. The maximum allowable levy is $0.50. In 2014, the levy rate was $0.50, since it was renewed at the maximum rate in August 2014. Because the EMS Levy is a form of property tax, is it subject to the same 1.0% annual increase plus new construction in years without voter-approved increases. It is therefore assumed that the levy revenue will begin to stabilize going forward as assessed values begin to grow at a pace more in line with historical growth as the region recovers from the recession. The timing of annexation will impact when the City begins to collect the EMS levy from the PAAs. Collections would only begin in 2017 if the City annexes the UGA early in 2016. Liquor Board Profits and Excise Tax. According to Washington State law, a share of the state profits from liquor sales and state collected excise tax on liquor is distributed directly to cities on a per capita to be $9.89 in 2014. This per capita estimate is assumed to increase with inflation. Gas Tax. A portion of the state-collected gas tax is shared directly with municipalities, which bear a substantial portion of the overall costs of road maintenance and construction. The gasoline and diesel tax is a flat amount levied per gallon (rather than a percentage of the price at the pump). Cities are allowed to use this funding for maintenance or capital, and Bremerton uses the full funding capita gas tax allocation of $20.03 in 2014. Since the tax is a per-gallon tax and not impacted by changes in prices, this per capita number is assumed to remain constant into the future. Municipal Court Revenues. These revenues are collected through fees that help cover the cost of Municipal Court services. These revenues are estimated to grow with increases in population and employment going forward, with the per capita and per employment amount growing with inflation into the future. Fines and Forfeits. Tcurrently projects the per capita revenues for fines and forfeits to be approximately $24.53 in 2014. This per capita estimate is assumed to increase with inflation going forward. Recreation Charges. This analysis assumes that current UGA residents are already using and recreation services, and therefore new revenue will only come from population growth from development within the UGA. Users who live in the PAAs and currently pay for parks and recreation services are charged a 25% surcharge for being non-residents. Therefore, there would be some loss in revenue from these uses being transitioned into the City at first. Over time, the revenue from new users will offset revenue loss from the 25% non-resident surcharge. Grants and Other Intergovernmental Revenue. The grants and transfers from other government agencies considered in this analysis are for operational expenditures only, not for capital projects. Future revenues from these sources are estimated on a per capita basis and applied to the annexation 2014 budget, are $20.08 and are assumed to increase at the rate of inflation. It is important to note that it is difficult to estimate this source of revenue, as grants tend to fluctuate widely from year to year, and that very little additional revenue will likely be seen from annexation. Police Services and Ambulance Transport Fees. The City estimates it will receive approximately $323,100 in 2014 from law enforcement services, such as fees for police service, fingerprint fees, and to be approximately $20.57 in 2014. This per capita estimate is assumed to increase with inflation going forward. This analysis assumes that the City would take over provision of fire and EMS services for Rocky Point, West Hills, and Navy Yard City. Bremerton Fire Department estimates approximately five ambulance transports per month from Navy Yard City, resulting in approximately $21,000 in additional revenue per year. Other Charges. This analysis models approximately $250,000 in other miscellaneous revenues. These charges include revenue streams such as investment interest, donations, miscellaneous permits and fees not related to buildings or businesses, and other minor charges for City services. Currently the revenue approximately $6.79 in 2014. This per capita estimate is assumed to increase with inflation going forward. Car Tab Fees. These fees currently accrue to the Transportation Benefit District (TBD) and are used to improve and repair existing streets. Tab fees are approved for a six year period and there is no existing City policy on allocating these revenues between capital and operating projects. In addition, any TBD revenues dedicated to operations in the Street fund are typically offset by expenditures to carry out the work plan, resulting in a net fiscal impact of zero. For these reasons, car tab fee revenue estimates are not included in this study. Leasehold Excise Tax, Commercial Parking Tax, Gambling Tax, and Internal Charges for Service. These revenues are not expected to be impacted by the annexation of these PAAs, as the taxes are structured 4.2SHORT-TERM OPERATING COST IMPACTS Exhibit 5 summarizes the estimated cost impacts of a 2016 annexation in 2020 five years later. The chart shows 2020 because it presents a snapshot of the short-term impact of annexation once development in the PAAs has begun and the departments have hired up to their full short-term need. Years 2016-2019 are not shown in the table because the exact impact in any one year will depend on how the City chooses to ramp up its hiring. The City will need to weigh the impacts on the ground as well as the actual revenue increases from the PAAs to determine when hiring decisions need to be made. The methodology behind these hiring numbers is described after the chart. Exhibit 5 Snapshot of Annexation Staffing and Cost Impacts, 2020 Source: BERK, 2015. The annual costs listed next to the FTE amounts reflect the total annual cost increase in each of these departments due to annexation. In some cases, these increases include equipment, supplies, utility costs, and contract charges. Operating Cost Detail Operating cost and staffing impacts were estimated based on our land base fiscal model and refined after conversations with City staff. The following departments are estimated to receive cost impacts from the annexation: Finance. The finance department will likely need to add one additional Accounting Assistant II beginning in 2017 to handle the increase in licensing activity, and about 0.5 FTE additional payroll specialists to handle increased staffing levels in other departments. Police. The Police Department currently serves the City in five patrol areas with a total of 71 FTEs including commissioned and non-commissioned staff. According to the Bremerton Police Department, annexing all four PAAs at the same time would trigger the need for a new patrol area to serve the residents and businesses in these areas with the same response times that other City residents receive. While Rocky Point, West Hills, and Gorst do not currently generate a large call volume, Navy Yard City is known for a high volume of service calls related to felony crimes. If a new patrol area were added, it would require 6.0 FTEs to provide full-day patrol service. There would also be a need for 0.5 FTE Community Resource Specialists. There is a timing gap of approximately one year that exists for Police Officers between testing, academy, training, and readiness for patrol activities. To bridge this gap and also to phase-in the annexation impact in the short-term, the Police Department could add two FTEs to the graveyard shift (8pm until 6:40am) to cover the time with the highest number of calls. Another option is adding two FTEs to the graveyard shift and two FTEs to the day shift (6:20am until 5pm) to have better service coverage. However, both of these scenarios would still likely result in slower response times to the PAAs and possibly the City until the new patrol area is added. These additional staff members will necessitate a one-time capital investment for new vehicles (3 patrol cars at $42,000 each, using ratio of two officers per car) and equipment ($5,000 per officer, $30,000 total). Fire. The four PAAs differ in their estimated impacts to fire services: o Gorst. Given the geographic constraints of the UGA, the City plans to contract with South Kitsap Fire and Rescue (SKFR) to continue providing service to Gorst. The City would pay for this service $100,000 annually beginning in 2014, and would increase over time with development in Gorst. o Rocky Point. Similar to Gorst, this area is currently served by SKFR. The City already responds to calls in this area based on mutual aid agreements, and the Fire Department estimates that they can provide service to this area with no additional staffing. o West Hills. This area is currently served by Central Kitsap Fire and Rescue (CKFR). Considering the small geography and low call volume, the Fire Department estimates that they can provide service to this area with no additional staffing. o Navy Yard City. This area is also currently served by SKFR; unlike other PAAs, it generates high volumes of calls for service. The Fire Department estimates that annexing this area will necessitate changes to the current response zones including the need for two additional firefighters. March 8, 2017 Andrea Spencer, Director Allison Satter, Senior Planner ANNEXATIONS #¨³¸ #®´­¢¨« 3³´£¸ 3¤²²¨®­ 0±¤²¤­³ ³¨®­ Drive Annexation Annexation Work - History of AnnexationsPreDifferent MethodsBoundary Review Board Annexations in General:Corbet OVERVIEW Annexation (84 acres): Approved 2009 Approved 2007Voter Recalled 2007 TracytonSKIA (PSIC) Annexation (3,500 acres):West Hills Annexation (172 acres): RECENT HISTORY OF ANNEXATIONS term - owners within an requiring property As identified in the Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies (KCPPs), the City anticipates incorporating the Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) within the planning timeframe. Evaluate annexations based on short and longcommunity impacts and benefitsEncourage and assist existing unincorporated Support annexations that create logical boundaries and reasonable service areas within where the City has the fiscal capacity to provide services, while indebtedness ANNEXATION POLICIES 2016 Comprehensive Plan: Tracyton ANNEXATION WORK - ). conducted an analysis which identified impacts of PRE Enetai BERKannexations to all West Bremerton UGAsAnalysis being prepared for East Bremerton UGAs (& Helps City Council realized cumulative impacts vs. piecemeal approach UGA Handouts of cost/benefit to Property Owner In Construction: Annexation Analyzer (online Calculator) COMPLETED FISCAL REVIEWEDUCATIONAL OUTREACH MATERIALS 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN front Land Use Designation - AGREEMENTS ANNEXATION WORK - PRE allows for water or sewer services outside City limits, thus property owner Example: Identifies Equivalent Land Use Designations between County and City Removes requirement for SEPA (Environmental Review)Allows Petitions to be processed more efficiently City signs an agreement to count towards consent for annexation. EQUIVALENCE TABLE OUTSIDE UTILITY County that city and the serving properties - agreement between subject to referendum election Election decides for annexation to occur based on an local Method - llows Most popular method of annexationVoters Petition By majority vote of Council, annexation can occur for MunicipalA(and/or Fire District) 60% Petition MethodElection MethodAnnexation for Municipal Services or Federally Owned LandsAnnexation of Unincorporated IslandsInter Washington State Law many different method of annexation: ANNEXATION PROCESSES File & Record Petition invoke review begins. 120 day become effective BRB does BRB does not invoke Ordinance jurisdiction, 45 days, then jurisdiction in get Review Boundary Ordinance Board (BRB) forwarded to pass an Public to annex. ordinance Once 60% Hearing to with intent received City Council holds passes, seek 60% process stops Signatures Petitioners the annexation If Resolution the (3/15). Public Prepare Petition, Resolution Petitioners annexation Fiscal Plan, ³® ¢®­²¨£¤± Holds Public Notices, and Resolution is Meeting with ANNEXATION PROCESS: 60% PETITION METHOD (1/23) Receive Petition districts within days it is approved. - and port , . water/sewer annexed area. appointed by Governor, one by the County, one by the Cities, - changes by cities, fire districts, , new city incorporations, and district mergers days to invoke jurisdiction. No ones invokes, after 45 - members: 2 - City annexationsWho can invoke jurisdiction: Kitsap County, any affected governmental unit or petition of registered voters of the Reviews boundary Kitsap County:Upon adoption of City Ordinance (following 60% petition) to Annex, City submits to BRBBRB has 45If jurisdiction is invoked: Potentially 120 days added to review/address conflict BRB: BRB: 5and one for Special Purpose Districts BRB Process: BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD (BRB) arcels: Upcoming p Pending Annexation in East Bremerton UGA: Waiting on Petition Request Drive: Annexation of Municipal Purposes: Ordinance that super majority (5 of 7) of Council must approve CorbetClogstonCity owned watershed STATUS ON ANNEXATIONS Kitsap Lake Addition area (11 acres) Tracyton Tracyton islands: Small Small areas contiguous to City: Expanded UGA for Southwestern portion of Kitsap Lake (6 acres)Gorst Other potential annexations utilizing OUAs: STATUS ON ANNEXATIONS the annexation? Before specific proposal: any general questions on QUESTIONS? Public Meeting on March 15, 2017 DRIVE ANNEXATION CORBET Decision before City Council Location & BoundaryMethod & Process of this annexationCost/Benefits of Annexations TO PREPARE COUNCIL FOR THE 3/15 MEETING Whether the City will accept, reject, or modify the proposed annexation?Will it require simultaneous adoption of the Comprehensive Plan?Whether it will require the assumption of all or any portion of the indebtedness by the area to be annexed? QUESTIONS FOR COUNCIL TO CONSIDER 1.2.3. Rocky Point UGA PROPOSED ANNEXATION LOCATION 10% PETITIONERS 1.5 acre parcel24 acres City Clerk received Petitioner Request January 23, 2017Outside Utility Agreements (OUAs) DECISION: COUNCIL ACCEPT, MODIFY, OR REJECT PROPOSAL 2016 Comprehensive Plan addresses Land Use Designations for our UGAs and utilizes the Equivalence Table to predesignate the Comprehensive Plan for any annexed areasNo additional Comprehensive Plan adoption is required Will there be need for an additional Comprehensive Plan adoption? Question: COUNCIL DECISION:COMP PLAN ADOPTION REQUIRED? Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan policy and MRSC, the Council should require a condition of annexation for the property owners assume their share of indebtedness the City has where indebtedness Will Council require the annexed territory to assume the cost of the Fire Capital Bond? Support annexations the fiscal capacity to provide services, while requiring property owners within an annexing area to assume a share of the Question:Attachment II: Fiscal Analysis provided to help you consider the impactsComp Plan Policy:cities do require the assumption of indebtedness as a condition of COUNCIL DECISION:ACCEPT AREA INDEBTEDNESS term - term - term and moderate - to long - FISCAL PLAN Proportionate: 1.5% of West Bremerton UGASSlight negative impact in the shortannual benefit in the medium Cost Estimates for Short and Long$8.8M identified for Rocky Point Capital Improvements, though this proposal is for a small portion of the area needed for Capital improvementsNot part of the Rocky Point Water District BRB (45 or 120 days) (April 2017) Ordinance Assessors) (Confirmed by Seek 60% Petitioners Notifying the County DRIVE ANNEXATION 10% Petition (March 15, 2017) Resolution: PROCESS: CORBET Petitioners: will accept, reject, or modify the proposed Will the City annexation?Will it require simultaneous adoption of the Comprehensive Plan?Whether it will require the assumption of all or any portion of the indebtedness by the area to be annexed? Petitioners are the Original Petitioner and OUA Properties CONCLUSION City Council will hold a Public Meeting with the In addition, the City would likely need to add one FTE for additional fire inspection services. This within the annexation areas s fire code as they come into This staff person would also support the need for additional inspections as development ramps up in Gorst. Municipal Court. The City currently contracts for public defender services, budgeted at $285,000 per 2014 budget. Since the increase in demand for these services is driven by caseload, this analysis assumes that this contract will increase proportionally with population growth over time. To estimate the impacts of annexation, the current per capita cost of this contract within the City was applied to the increase in population from annexation. This approach results in an estimated cost of approximately $17,000 in 2014, growing with both inflation and population going forward. This contract cost also grows over time due to population increase within the current city boundaries. Considering caseload increases in the current city and annexation areas, the total contract is projected to increase to approximately $380,000 in 2020. In addition, the City will likely need to increase to hear a higher number of cases. This can be accomplished by increasing the contracted number of hours with the Court Commissioner, estimated to cost approximately $15,000 per year. This cost will continue to increase with inflation annually until 2021 when an additional part-time judge (or bigger contract for the Commissioner) is estimated to be needed. The total cost impact of annexation is estimated at $37,000 in 2020. Community Development. The community development department will likely need to add 1.5 FTE additional Building Development Specialist II (building inspector and plan reviewer) to handle the increase in permit activity citywide. These additional staff members will necessitate a one-time capital investment for a vehicle when they are hired. The analysis assumes a one-time cost of $36,000 for vehicle and other equipment. Parks Maintenance and Recreation Level of Service (LOS) requires a neighborhood park to be within ½ mile pedestrian distance of all residences. Based on the land area included in the PAAs and the locations of existing neighborhood and community parks, the model estimates there would need to be seven new neighborhood parks to meet LOS requirements for the newly annexed areas. Using a minimum of 1.5 acres per new neighborhood park, this translates into a minimum of 10.5 acres of new park area in the annexed areas. Assuming a maintenance cost to the City of approximately $4,000 per developed acre, this would generate about $42,000 in costs per year once the parks are developed (reflected in the model as 0.25 FTE laborer, with associated non-labor costs). While the exact development timeline of these parks is unknown, this analysis assumes maintenance beginning in 2019 to provide the City with a conservative estimate of cost impacts. Additionally, based on population growth, the City may need to hire approximately 0.25 FTEs in recreation program staff to support additional recreational users once residential development in the UGA comes online. Street Maintenance. The new lane miles that will be added to the City through annexation, from both the existing roads in the PAAs as well as new roads that will be built as the UGA develops, will drive the need for additional maintenance staff. Based on the constraints of hiring for partial positions, the City would have to add a full 2.0 FTE based on the additional demand. Additionally, there will be marginal costs related to the additional lane mileage beyond staff time, including supplies, materials, and utility costs to support the maintenance work. This results in annual costs of significantly more than just salaries and benefits for the 2.0 FTE. These additional non-labor costs are based on the average non-labor costs per FTE that the City currently budgets in the Street Fund. Non-Departmental Impacts. In addition to department-specific impacts, the growth in population and development will result in marginal cost increases to election services, population-based contracts with other jurisdictions, and programs like animal control. These costs are based on the share of population between the baseline City and the City after annexation. This analysis of non-departmental impacts includes the following major costs: o Election services o Care and custody of prisoners o Animal Control o Kitsap County emergency management contract o Public health district contract and alcoholism programs Additionally, the City may incur additional costs from assuming responsibility for the proportionate PAAs. In total, non-departmental impacts are estimated at about $100,000 per year immediately after annexation, and the majority of these costs will grow with inflation and population over time. The analysis assumes that the other departments not mentioned explicitly above such as City Council, Legal, will not be impacted. 4.3SHORT-TERM CAPITAL IMPACTS The following provides an overview of short-term capital facility projects between 2015 and 2020 with an assumption of annexation in 2016. Overall, there are nine separate short-term capital facility projects identified, totaling approximately $18.6 million. Responsibility for these projects is divided between the City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, public grants, and local utility LIDs. Exhibit 6 provides a list of the individual projects by capital facility type, PAA, and funding source. Exhibit 6 Planned Short-term Sewer Capital Projects SOURCE: City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014; Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013. City of Bremerton Responsibilities For purposes of this analysis, capital facility projects financed by user fee assessments (UFA) were classified as City of Bremerton projects. A conservative approach was taken whereby projects that either have full or partial City funding ownership including UFAs were categorized as City funded projects. As a result, it is estimated that approximately $15.9 million in short-term capital facility projects would be funded by the City. The following provides a brief overview of short-term capital facility projects by capital type for those projects identified as having City-based funding sources. Fire. (Cost: None). There were no short-term capital impacts related to Fire services for annexation. Police. (Cost: None).There were no short-term capital impacts related to Police services for annexation. Parks. (Cost: None). There were no short-term capital impacts related to Parks services for annexation. Sewer. One to seven projects (Cost: up to $15.3 million). A total of seven short-term sewer capital facility projects have been identified that are located across the four annexation areas. The four PAAs differ in their respective estimated impact to short-term sewer capital facilities as listed below. Note: Some projects overlap or cross annexation geographies and may be listed more than once. Gorst. (Cost: Up to $200,000). One short-term sewer-related capital improvement project was identified for Gorst, the Grout Annular Space of SW Bremerton Force Main. This project is funded by the City via user assessment fees. Navy Yard City. (Cost: Up to $6.9 million). Three short-term sewer capital facility projects have been identified for Navy Yard City including: o Westside WWTP Outfall o East and West Bremerton UGA Sewerage ULID Development o Grout Annular Space of SW Bremerton Force Main All of these projects would be financed by a combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or utility LIDs. Navy Yard City Additional Context: Prior to the current annexation study, the County expressed interest in the City taking ownership of the Navy Yard City sewer infrastructure. However, as the infrastructure for this area dates to WWII there are significant related operating, maintenance, and capital facility costs. Approximately five years ago the County offered the City $1,000,000 in capital funding to support transition to City ownership. At the time, it was decided that City ownership did not make sense from a financial perspective and transition of ownership to the City did not take place. Currently, there is one short-term sewer capital facility project listed within the Kitsap County Public Works Sewer Utility Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan the Navy Yard City I & I Collection System Improvements project, with an estimated cost of $2.7 million. Based upon conversations with the City, this project would need to be completed by the County as a prerequisite for annexation. Rocky Point. (Cost: up to $8.8 million). A total of four short-term capital improvement projects have been identified including: o Jackson to Corbet Drive Sub Basin RP-3 o Phinney Bay Extension Sub Basin RP-3 o Sewer Collection Sub Basin RP-5 o East and West Bremerton UGA Sewerage ULID Development All of these projects would be financed by a combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or utility LIDs. West Hills. (Cost: up to $1.5 million). Two short-term capital facility projects have been identified including: o Ostrich Bay Extension o East and West Bremerton UGA Sewerage ULID Development All of these projects would be financed by a combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or utility LIDs. Stormwater. One project (Cost: up to $600,000). The Gorst Creek Watershed Capital Improvement Plan lists the need for a Flood Cause Study to evaluate flooding within the UGA. The plan estimated the cost of the study at $600,000 and designated the City of Bremerton as responsible for funding. Listed revenue sources for this Flood Cause Study include the stormwater fund and grants. There were no other short-term stormwater capital facility projects identified in the remaining PAAs. Transportation: (Cost: TBD). There were no short-term capital impacts related to transportation for annexation. Water. (Cost: None). There were no short-term capital impacts related to water capital facilities for annexation. Short-term Capital Revenues funded by the enterprise funds themselves. The City manages four capital improvement funds general capital improvements, park facilities construction, Washington Avenue connector, and Lower Wheaton Way. The largest funding sources for Washington Avenue connector and Lower Wheaton Way are grants, which are not expected to be impacted by annexation. The remaining capital funds are primarily supported by the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET). This section describes how the annexation would generate additional REET revenues. Real Estate Excise Tax. The REET is levied on all sales of real estate, both commercial and residential, that occur within City boundaries. The City collects REET at a 0.5% tax rate based on the transaction price of the sale. To estimate REET revenues, this analysis makes assumptions about the turnover rate of properties within the PAAs. The current rate of real estate sales is still slightly lower than historical averages due to the recovery from the recession. To be conservative, this analysis assumes a turnover rate of 4.0% for residential properties and 2.5% for commercial properties through 2015, and then a return to a more typical rate of 5.0% for residential properties and 3.5% for commercial properties for 2016 and beyond. These assumptions result in the following REET revenue impacts from the PAAs: in the near term, 2016- 2020, the City is estimated to receive a total of approximately $675,000 in REET revenues from the PAAs, or an average of about $135,000 per year. This is based on turnover of existing property as well as sales of new development. This compares to approximately $400,000 in the REET revenue per year, which is expected to increase as the economy recovers and development returns to a more typical pace. The City has additional revenue sources, besides REET, that can be used for capital funding. These include the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax and the Commercial Parking Tax. However, given current pressures on operations through the general and street funds, it may be difficult for the City to reallocate significant portions of these funds to capital expenditures in the short-term. 5.0LONG-TERM ANNEXATION IMPACTS 5.1LONG-TERM OPERATING IMPACTS Over the long run, it is estimated that revenues generated by activity in the PAAs will be higher than costs and staffing needs generated by the areas. These general long-term fiscal impacts of annexation mirror the short-term findings, as shown in Exhibit 3, and will result in a positive annual impact to the City o However, as with any long-term financial analysis, there are risks inherent in some of the revenue and cost analysis that could arise. A few issues that could substantially change the long-term outlook include: Development Assumptions. The development assumptions included in the model drive nearly all of the cost and revenue findings presented above. Very few impacts are generated simply by the geography of the annexation, rather they are generated by the people and businesses that choose to live and operate there. Therefore, there would be risk if the PAAs did not develop as quickly as planned. The risk is primarily that the PAAs would not have as large of a fiscal benefit to the City. Given the moderate current population and the low level of service need, a lower development rate would result in both lower costs and revenues, resulting in a minor and possible negligible fiscal benefit if development did not occur. Fire Service Needs. The short term impacts of annexing Gorst UGA are to be addressed through a contract with South Kitsap Fire & Rescue. However in the long term, the City would need to look at providing these services directly. In that case, the City would need a fire station (of which there is one currently in Gorst), an engine/paramedic unit, and 6- 5.2LONG-TERM CAPITAL IMPACTS Over the remainder of the study period, there are additional capital facility needs, particularly for parks, sewer, stormwater, and transportation facilities. Responsibility for these projects is divided between the City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and private property owners via local utility LIDs. All Capital Facility Needs The scope of this analysis does not include a new examination of all this section focuses on compiling and describing the capital needs identified in recent capital facility needs analyses including: City of Bremerton, Bremerton Annexation of Gorst UGA Memo, 2014 City of Bremerton, Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013 City of Bremerton, Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement, 2013 City of Bremerton, White Paper: Rock Point Assumption Issues, 2014 Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Capital Improvement Program Overview, 2014 Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Water System Plan Update, 2012 Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities, Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014 Bremerton Parks Department, Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2014 Kitsap County, UGA Sizing & Composition Remand Final Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2012 Kitsap County Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2012 Kitsap County Public Works, Navy Yard City Sewer CFP 2015-2020 Kitsap County Public Works, Sewer Utility Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019 Kitsap County Public Works, Solid Waste Division Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019 Kitsap County Public Works, Surface and Stormwater Plan Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2019 Kitsap County Public Works, Transportation Six-Year Improvement Program 2015-2020 City of Bremerton Responsibilities Funding sources for the identified long-term capital facility projects vary by project type and include the City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, WSDOT, grants, and local utility LIDs. For purposes of this analysis, capital facility projects financed by user fee assessments (UFA) were classified as City of Bremerton projects. Overall, after the year 2020 there are 32 projected capital facility projects located across the PAAs, totaling $51.3 million. Exhibit 7 provides a high level summary of long-term capital facility costs by jurisdictional funding source with an estimated $33.8 million worth of capital facility projects to be funded by the City of Bremerton. As shown in detail in Exhibit 8, there are multiple long-term capital facility projects whose funding sources are either undetermined or potentially shared. As a result, a conservative approach was taken whereby projects that either have full, potential, or undetermined City funding ownership were listed as City of Bremerton projects. A brief discussion of long-term capital facility projects by facility type is provided below. Exhibit 7 Long-term Capital Facility Projects by Jurisdiction CityCountyCounty/StateStateTotal FireTBD---$ - ParksTBD---$ - Police----$ - Sewer$ 31,890,000---$ 31,890,000 Stormwater$ 1,858,000-$ 456,000$ 3,224,000$ 5,538,000 TransportationTBD$ 12,804,000--$ 12,804,000 Water--$ 1,100,000-$ 1,100,000 Total$ 33,748,000$ 12,804,000$ 1,556,000$ 3,224,000$ 51,332,000 Source: Kitsap County/City of Bremerton Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013; City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014; City of Bremerton Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2014; Kitsap County Public Works Transportation Six-Year Improvement Program 2015-2020; City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014. Fire. New fire station and equipment (Cost: TBD). Upon annexation, the South Kitsap Fire & Rescue district would provide support services including equipment to the Gorst UGA. Over the long-term the City would assume fire service to this area requiring a fire station and the purchase of related equipment (e.g. fire engine, paramedic unit). The estimate for these costs are undetermined but would be needed as part of long-term capital facilities planning for the City. Police. (Cost: None). There were no long-term capital impacts related to Police services for annexation identified. Parks. Seven additional neighborhood parks totaling 10.5 acres in size (Cost: TBD). To meet Level of Service (LOS) standards established by the City, a neighborhood class level park is required to be within ½ mile pedestrian distance of all residences. Based on the land area included in the PAAs and the locations of existing neighborhood and community parks, the analysis estimates there would need to be seven new neighborhood parks to meet established LOS requirements within the newly annexed areas. The LOS park analysis excludes both Pendergast Park Regional Park in Navy Yard City and Harborside Fountain Park in Bremerton. Using a minimum of 1.5 acres per new neighborhood park, an additional seven new parks would translate into a minimum of 10.5 acres of new park lands that would need to be purchased in the annexed areas. The estimated cost of purchasing new park lands depends on a variety of factors such as location, site topography, potential remediation needs, and other factors. Estimating this cost is outside the scope of this analysis; this cost remains undetermined. Exhibit 8. Long-term Capital Facility Projects by Capital Facility Type Funding Capital Facility UGAProjectsCostsYear 3 Type Source FireAllFire station; engine/paramedic unitTBD> 2020TBD 1 All7 Additional neighborhood parks (10.5 acres) TBD> 2020TBD Parks PoliceAllNone$0> 2020- SewerNavy Yard CityReplace Crosstown Pipeline (#C-3)$8,600,000> 2020UFA SewerNavy Yard CitySR 304 Sewer Collection (#NS-3)$4,280,000> 2020UFA/G SewerRocky PointPump Station MD-2 (#NS-2B)$4,730,000> 2020UFA/G SewerRocky PointPump Station MD-3 (#NS-2C)$2,830,000> 2020UFA/G SewerRocky PointSewer Collection - Sub Basin MD-1 (#NS-1A)$2,550,000> 2020UFA/G SewerRocky PointSewer Collection - Sub Basin MD-2 (#NS-1B)$1,320,000> 2020UFA/G SewerRocky PointSewer Collection - Sub Basin RP-1 (#NS-2D)$1,220,000> 2020UFA/G SewerRocky PointSewer Collection - Sub Basin RP-2 (#NS-2E)$2,180,000> 2020UFA/G SewerRocky PointSewer Collection - Sub Basin RP-4 (#NS-2G)$820,000> 2020UFA/G SewerRocky PointSewer Collection - Sub Basin RP-5 (#NS-2H)$1,910,000> 2020UFA/G SewerWest HillsNorth Extension (#NS-4B)$1,450,000> 2020UFA/G StormwaterAllNPDES UpgradesTBD> 2020TBD StormwaterGorstGorst Creek floodplain flooding$15,000> 2020TBD StormwaterGorstHighway flooding from two creeks$3,224,000> 2020WSDOT StormwaterGorstHillside seepage & stream overbank flooding$99,000> 2020TBD StormwaterGorstPrivate storm sewer piping creating sink hole & fish $456,000> 2020County/State passage barrier StormwaterGorstRoadway undermining and culvert clogging$13,000> 2020UFA/G StormwaterGorstStorm drain piping & sink hole$216,000> 2020TBD StormwaterGorstStream overtopping$1,049,000> 2020TBD StormwaterGorstUpstream Culvert 12 inlet flooding and fish $292,000> 2020TBD passage, Map ID #111010 StormwaterGorstWater quality concerns with yard flooding$0> 2020- StormwaterGorstWater quality with private pond$0> 2020- StormwaterGorstWSDOT Hwy 3 flooding$174,000> 2020TBD 2 AllPossible bike improvementsTBD> 2020TBD Transportation TransportationAllPossible pedestrian ImprovementsTBD> 2020TBD TransportationGorstBelfair Widening to 4 lanes - Bremerton City Limits $2,822,000> 2020County to Sam Christopherson Ave. TransportationGorstBelfair Widening to 4 lanes - Mason County Line to $9,982,000> 2020County Bremerton City Limits TransportationGorstPossible Intersection improvements - Sherman TBD> 2020TBD Heights Road WaterAllNone$1,100,000> 2020County/State Total$51,332,000 1 This table does not include costs of upgrading the UGAs' current transportation infrastructure to an urban standard. 2 These parks were identified as part of the long-term annexation analysis, and are not identified in any existing City or County capital documents. 3 UFA = User Fee Assessment; G = Grants & LID Source: Kitsap County/City of Bremerton Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013; City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014; City of Bremerton Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan, 2014; Kitsap County Public Works Transportation Six-Year Improvement Program 2015-2020; City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update, 2014. Sewer. One to eleven projects (Cost: up to $31.9 million). A total of 11 long-term sewer capital facility projects have been identified that would be fully or partially located within the PAAs. All of the 11 long- term sewer projects identified are listed in the 2014 City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan Update. The four PAAs differ in their estimated impacts to sewer capital facilities: Gorst. (Cost: None). No long-term sewer capital improvements have been identified. Navy Yard City. (Cost: Up to $12.9 million). Two long-term sewer capital improvement projects have been identified. The first is the Replace Crosstown Pipeline project to be financed by user fee assessments. The second is the SR 304 Sewer Collection project and it would be financed by a combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or utility LIDs. Rocky Point. (Cost: up to $17.6 million). A total of eight long-term capital improvement projects have been identified. These include two pump station projects (Pump Station MD-2 and MD-3) and six sub-basin sewer collection projects (Sub Basin MD-1, MD-2, RP-1, RP-2, RP-4, and RP-5). All projects would be financed by combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or utility LIDs. West Hills. (Cost: up to $1.5 million). One project has been identified the North Extension project. This project would be financed by combination of user fess assessments, grants, and/or utility LIDs. Stormwater. (Cost: up to $1.86 million). The majority of long-term stormwater projects identified are within the Gorst annexation area. Additional NPDES-related stormwater projects are anticipated across all PAAs (see Exhibit 9). All PAAs. It is anticipated that the NPDES regulatory framework adopted by the City of Bremerton would facilitate the planning and building of new stormwater structures within any one or all of the PAAs. To date, no NPDES related capital improvement projects have been identified nor funding sources identified. However, upon annexation, NPDES related projects may add costs and/or impacts to stormwater capital facility planning over the long-term. Gorst. Between one to seven projects (Cost: up to $1.86 million). The Gorst Creek Watershed Plan identifies 35 sites within the watershed that need stormwater improvements. Of these projects, 11 are within the Gorst UGA. These projects are shown in Exhibit 9 below. Exhibit 9 Long-term Stormwater Capital Facility Needs for the Gorst UGA (2018 - 2035) Source: Kitsap County/City of Bremerton Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan, 2013. The plan provides initial cost estimates for these projects and lists the entity responsible for each project. Of the 11 projects in the Gorst UGA, seven are designated the responsibility of the City of Bremerton. These seven projects total $1.86 million. Responsibility for stormwater projects is based on the Gorst Creek Watershed Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan Technical Memorandum completed in September, 2013. Discussions with the City of Bremerton Public Works Department indicate that they believe the City is only responsible for projects in the public right-of-way, which is just one project totaling $13,000. $771,000. As a result, potential long-term stormwater capital costs vary widely based on how responsibility is ultimately assigned. To be conservative, the City may want to assume the maximum of $1.86 million when considering the full impacts of annexation. Once Gorst residents begin paying into t the City may be expected to partner on drainage issues on both public and private party. Transportation. (Cost: TBD). Future transportation infrastructure capital investments will be necessary to achieve a modern urban standard. The City should consider long-term planning around upgrading the UGAs current transportation infrastructure to an urban standard which may include adding sidewalks, curbs, gutters, bike paths, and storm drain systems. These improvements could be phased over time as the City identifies specific needs and revenue sources. Water. (Cost: Up to $1.1 million). Currently, the Cityprovides drinking water to the Gorst, Navy Yard City, and West Hills annexation areas as part of the Bremerton Service Area. The City also ultimately supplies drinking water to the Rocky Point annexation area but its relationship to Rocky Point remains unique. In particular, although Rocky Point conveyed its water system infrastructure to the City in 1952, the area has maintained its own special purpose water district with an elected three-person board of commissioners with responsibilities for administration, planning, and capital improvements. This structure currently results in redundant costs for Rocky Point residents. Upon annexation the City would likely enter into negotiations with the Rocky Point Water District for potential inclusion within the City of Bremerton water utility. Prior to assumption by the City, should that occur, improvements may need to be completed within the Rocky Point Water District, financed by non-City funding sources. These improvements have an estimated cost of approximately $1.1 million. APPENDIX A: GORST PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE LAND USE MAP Exhibit A- 1 shows the future land use map for the Gorst UGA under the Preferred Alternative. Exhibit A- 1 Gorst UGA Preferred Alternative Future Land Use Map Source: City of Bremerton, 2014. WHAT IF WE BECAME PART OF BREMERTON... Rocky Point in 20 annually. LEVEL OF SERVICE Representation. represented by three County Commissioners serving 250,000 people, residents would be served by one Mayor and seven City Council Members serving about 40,000 people. Police Services. Fire and EMS Services. Parks and Recreation For More Information, with geographic service standards (1/2 mile distanc Please Contact: Utilities MUNICIPAL TAXES AND FEES Annex to County Assumptions: three that owns their own home and has approximate this include: 2 7.0 HCF 6.5 HCF * Fire Levy County Roads Levy Monthly Garbage Level $89 * to levy this tax on annexed property is a Stormwater Garbage we have included them (based using the increased assessed value $808 annexed. $0 included as a cost to annexed residents. Existing City of Bremerton ¯ Water & Sewer Infrastructure 1 9 T H 18T H PotentialAnnexation 1 7 T H Legend aterain Sewer Mains Study Area City Limits 00.12Miles