HomeMy WebLinkAboutMCDOUGALL, STEVEN & CATHERINE When Recording Return To:
City Clerk
City of Bremerton
345 Sixth Street, Suite 600
Bremerton,WA 98337
MCDOUGALL CATHERINE 201611220086
Agreement Rec Fee: $ 103.00
11/22/2016 10:52 AM Page. 1 of 31
Dolores Gilmore, Kitsap Co Auditor
I IIII II 1111 III IIIII IIII IIIVII 111111 IIIA IIIA 111111 III IIII III HMI
IIII
AUDITOR/RECORDER'S INDEXING FORM
Document Title(s): 1. Habitat&Vegetation Management Plan A
/I�f2.2rh¢N
Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released: N/A
Grantor(s)/ 1. Steven&Catherine McDougall
Declarant:
Additional names on page of document.
Grantee(s): 1. City of Bremerton,a Municipal Corporation
Additional names on page of document.
Legal Description: LOT 13,DOCKSIDE ON KITSAP LAKE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF,RECORDED IN VOLUME 25 OF PLATS,PAGE 137 RECORDS OF
KITSAP COUNTY,WASHINGTON.
Additional legal is on page of document.
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number: 5092-000-013-0003
HABITAT &VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
Permit File No.: BB16 00386
Project Address: 6052 OSPREY CIRCLE
WHEREAS, Grantor/Declarant has sought a development permit from the City of
Bremerton, a Washington Municipal Corporation; and
WHEREAS,Grantor/Declarant has sought permission from the City of Bremerton
to construct improvements on a portion of the property that is encumbered by a Critical
Area, specifically a "Category III Wetland" as defined and set forth in Chapter
20.14.320(a)(l)(iii) Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC), and is located within the
"Shoreline Jurisdiction" as defined and set forth in Chapter 3 of the Bremerton
Shoreline Master Program (BSMP); and
WHEREAS, BSMP 7.010 Regulations(d)(4), provides that the City of Bremerton may
reduce the width of shoreline buffers when a supported by a Habitat Management Plan;
and
WHEREAS,BSMP 7.020 Regulations(a)(8),provides that the City of Bremerton
shall require that any owner of real property seeking a development or redevelopment
within the shoreline jurisdiction must sign a"Notice of Title"for Vegetation
Management Plans; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of developing this portion of the property, and in
recognition of the City's ministerial function in accepting and approving
Grantor's/Declarant's development plans, Grantor/Declarant has agreed to execute and
record this hold harmless agreement and covenant.
NOW THEREFORE,
Grantor/Declarant hereby declares and agrees as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are made a part of this agreement as if fully set
forth herein.
2. Grantor/Declarant is the owner of the real property situated in the City of
Bremerton, Kitsap County, State of Washington described in the Legal Description
above.
3. Grantor/Declarant applied for a development permit on the subject
property and has agreed to execute and record this agreement and covenant.
4. Covenant Running with the Property. This agreement, and the attached
September 2016 BGE Environmental, LLC. Habitat Management Plan, is a perpetual
covenant running with the "property" and is binding upon the Grantor's/Declarant's
successor and assigns.
5. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Covenant are
held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion(s)of this Covenant and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
6. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Covenant are
held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portion(s) of this Covenant and the same shall remain in full force and effect.
DATED at Bremerton, Kitsap County,Washington, this22'day of ii0 t[ hA
, 20149.
GRANTOR/DECLARANT:
(Owner of real property, including spouse)
OthinmA2A.114471
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss.
COUNTY OF KITSAP )
On this 2-2-- day of (\b./MI bQ ,201(0 ,before me a Notary Public in and for die
State of Washington,personally appeared 5keljC;rl II/Ac i.joJ I and C4.4- itne_ MG lb,ujetk0
,personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the persons
who executed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act and deed for
the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument.
-Notary Seal Must Appear Within This Box-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and official seal day and year first above written.
J4�y444 iU /
'�`+11Of,.„7
'
a QTS/firsNOTARY PUBLIC,in andtigicthe Stale
” of Washington,residing at
Ui'O IS w 4
C L I C w a My appointment expires 12104 / oZ 0/9-
``moo
r. ' A
The foregoing Agreement is accepted by the City of Bremerton this day of
,20
CITY OF BREMERTON:
By:
Print Name:
Its:
6052 OSPREY CIRCLE
McDougall Deck Replacement
Habitat Management Plan
September 20, 2016
BGE16_05300
NECLEIVE2
OCT 072016
City of Bremerton,DCD w,
IDUIri £NVIIZONM€NTA., LLL.
WETLAND &NSl1LTIN6 AND LAND IMF.Pt AMMUJ4.
6052 OSPREY CIRCLE
McDougall Deck Replacement
Habitat Management Plan
September 20, 2016
Kitsap County Assessors Tax Account Number:
5092-000-0160003
Section 17, Township 24 N, Range 01 E, W.M.
Prepared For:
Steven and Catherine McDougall
PO Box 7014
Spreckels, CA 93962
Prepared By:
BGE Environmental, LLC
2102 Brashem Ave
Bremerton, WA 98310
360.710.6066
BGE16_05300
www.bgeenvironmental.com
, •
CERTIFICATION
The technical material and data contained in this document were prepared under the supervision
and direction of the undersigned, as a professional wetland scientist licensed to practice as such, is
affixed below.
A
a
• ADB6YN MYERS y
1286 At
Prepared by Robbyn Myers, PWS
fb - (00110.
ir3P(A6 £NVIFDNM€NTRL, LLG.
WETLAND CONSULTING AND LAND USE PLANNING
INTRODUCTION
Steven and Catherine McDougall are owners to a 0.25 acre parcel located at 6052 Osprey Circle,
Bremerton, Washington. The parcel is shoreline frontage to Kitsap Lake. The McDougalls are
proposing to demolish and rebuild a deck to the front of the residence,shoreline facing. The
proposed actions includes upper level decking over the new lower. All actions lie within the existing
footprint of the ground floor deck,see Site Plan-Deck Replacement/Addition by N.L. Olson &
Associates, Inc.
The parcels entirety is within the 200 ft shoreline jurisdiction. Lake fringe wetlands define the
shoreline just prior to determination of the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). The Shoreline
designation is Residential and the wetlands are Category III. Strict application of standard buffers to
the shoreline and wetlands cannot be achieved with legal lot dimensions and the existing use.
The proposed actions are over existing with no expansion to impervious surfaces. This Habitat
Management Plan respectfully requests approval to redevelop over the existing footprint and
recommends the establishment and restoration of shoreline buffer ranging from 11 to 19 ft.
1239 6115 # L____12516009
6032 054 60'30 ( 4 6018 0246026
•
6022 0._ i i n z rt6 27 597v
6036 602
601
6040 6037023,,601 t o`S rig 602 C i
-i 60 8 .6,-zL �6(J1'.6010 6002
---/
604 1 60 1
m ah,+Fie 604 601_
�_ 6 ,21 5966
604. E039 5964
60486010E.\-- 701 018 24z.
Lf/0,3_48,.1 6014 Y e` 600+ I02 •u5953
6050 .042 600
6015 6021 023 7014 ,�.
3i604^ 7008 7012 k4
6054 60 5 0 604f z 5c,
605a �, 6043 �,,orant P 7020
6058 6057 \6\045�?P. 7C,+1 01 r o 7008
6060
k....--4",6061 u r. 60507;01 s 5922
�70+ 7006
606 605 51
1 5928
_60.. 6053'-+". ++ 7004
068 69 6054 700 r'D0 591
1969t5070:16075 609 6095 7�000
1971 0607,_ c.`..;., 6077 6098 591":1 590E
60;3 `t6221 '+"
19721972"6074 66n�t,OS2 60SYu� 5904
.:.,6109
1973 6078S`6D85 0 5905
2 610•
60f: - 60&6 - 1
1970 r61
6G'8.11\ L, 1520
609 1
1974 2 A‘ce 11, o
° I L I
PARCEL ASSESSMENT
Shoreline Designation
The parcel is set within the Single Family Residential Shoreline Designation. The standard buffer
width is based on lot depth of 131 ft requiring a shoreline buffer of 26 ft,or 20%of lot depth, Chapter
7.010 Regulations (d)(1), Bremerton Shoreline Master Program (BSMP) .The lake fringe wetland was
rated as a Category III system with a habitat score of 6,which results in a standard buffer of 220 ft,
Chapter 20.14.330(h)(1), Bremerton Municipal Code(BMC). Existing conditions put the deck at 31 ft
from the wetland and approximately 40 ft from OHWM.
Shoreline Analysis
The Kitsap Lake shoreline is largely single-family residential,with numerous docks, large areas of
modified shoreline,and very little riparian vegetation. There is a large publicly owned wetland on the
south side of the lake,a City park,and a U.S. Navy park on the west side of the lake. Single-family lots
are relatively small and narrow with little potential for additional subdivision. The cumulative effects
analysis of residential development on Kitsap Lake indicate a likelihood of redevelopment with minor
gains to vegetated buffer. No change or positive change in ecological functions is achievable or
anticipated. The shoreline residential designation is intended to support residential development and
maintain existing character of open space, bulk,scale and intensity.
The McDougall shoreline is one of the few lots that retains a lake fringe wetland bound by an
immediate common use of yard. The wetland is a Category Ill complex, rating attached. The wetland
buffer is overcome with English ivy, Himalayan blackberry, and yard, existing along an immediate
topographical break from OHWM.The width is estimated at 5 to 7 ft,along 71 ft of shoreline
frontage. Landward the area is lawn up to the deck. A private dock penetrates through the wetland
and shoreline,center of the property. Vegetation observed within the wetland included bulrush,
yellow iris, pond lily,willow, English ivy and Himalayan blackberry.
The wetland continues both north and south of the McDougall property, having variable vegetation
complexity, density and coverage. The limits of observation were parcel specific and adjacent views.
Aerial interpretation allowed for an estimated riparian distance of 650 ft, north and south. However,
the limits of the wetland are not absolute as nine docks are observed along this tract. Severance of
the wetland unit is highly probable. Professional judgement is applied along with personal knowledge
of the lake by use.
Priority habitat and species use within Kitsap Lake is documented as winter steelhead, resident
coastal cutthroat and coho. Cutthroat are documented to migrate through the lake to the south to a
contributing stream.
IMPACT ANALYSIS
Impact analysis for the redevelopment of the McDougall deck to shoreline ecological functions is net
zero.All actions are over existing or elevated to the second floor. No vegetation will be removed and
no change in impervious surfaces apply.
Avoidance and Minimization
Mitigation Measure Mitigation Action(s)
AVOID the impact altogether by not • The parcel is a legal lot. Maintenance and redevelopment is
taking a certain action or parts of an permissible.
action • No vegetation disturbance or removal proposed.
• Redevelopment over existing footprint.
• Impacts are avoided.
MINIMIZE impacts by limiting the • The 20+year old deck is in disrepair.
degree or magnitude of the action and • Redevelopment is over existing use.
its implementation by using • Minimization efforts are applied.
appropriate technology or by taking
affirmative steps to avoid or reduce
impacts
RECTIFY the impact by repairing, • Establishment of variable buffer which accommodates use,
rehabilitating,or restoring the affected access and enjoyment of lake side living.
environment • Restoration of buffer(variable width)to native shrubs.
• Shoreline ecological function recovered.
Buffer Reductions
Strict application of the shoreline buffer would eliminate common use area (yard)fronting the
lakeside residence. At a minimum, once the 10 ft building setback is acknowledged,the remaining
shoreline buffer would be 21 ft. Strict application of the Category III wetland buffer is outside the
limits of parcel ownership (220 ft).The existing use cannot meet the dimensional standard of this
provision.
This Habitat Management Plan is provided to recommend reasonable recovery of critical area
function with respect to existing use. In order to achieve rational, balanced, and responsible use of
our shorelines, wetland,and contributing functions,degraded conditions should be managed and
restored to not only recover but preserve system wide processes.Therefore,the McDougall deck
replacement proposes buffer restoration to the shoreline and associated wetland,despite having no
vegetation impact or increased impervious surface.
Buffer restoration is provided from the wetland boundary beyond the top-of-slope from 6 to 12 ft.
The established buffer will average between 11 and 19 ft. A 10 foot building setback is acknowledged.
The existing buffer is mostly grass with dense English ivy and Himalayan blackberry along the
ecotone. Invasive species will be removed and native shrubs will be installed. The No Net Loss
principal is achieved and recovery to shoreline ecological function is anticipated.
VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN
The buffer restoration proposes reestablishment of native vegetation along the shoreline which
targets the recovery of multiple functions and processes. These functions and processes include, but
are not limited to:
• Restoration of wetland buffer and function opportunity
• Protection of plant and animal species and habitat
• Provides food sources and sinks for aquatic and terrestrial interactions
• Reduces erosion
• Improves visual and aesthetic qualities of the shoreline
• Improves water quality
• Maintains and enhances habitat corridor parallel the shoreline
Planting Detail
Plant installation should occur as close to conclusion of construction activities as possible. Planting
should occur in the dormant season between October 1 and March 31.Once planted,the area
landward of the top-of-slope should be mulched to deter weedy growth and maintain water
moisture. Do not mulch waterward of the top-of-slope. Irrigation is recommended for at least two
years, or once plants have established.
All plant materials used shall be in good health from an approved nursery. For potted individuals,
plant to circular pits set at 6 ft on center(o.c.). Live stakes should be a minimum height of 24 in. Pres
stakes into the soil surface to a minimum of 12 in below the surface. If the soil is difficult to
penetrate, use a shovel to cut and loosen the profile prior to installing each individual stake.
Distribute plantings an approximated distance of 18 in o.c. The species proposed is Red Osier
Dogwood and can tolerate wet conditions. Therefore,these species can be set at and along the toe-
of-slope, within the wetland boundary. Do not�fertili
Planting calculations are based on an area ofl9g ft. Density spacing is dense for shrubs at full
coverage with maturity. Conceptual planting plan is provided for general location,species
distribution and materials specifications. Some flexibility is permissible in field installation.Species
alternatives may be necessary based on availability.Any alternatives proposed shall be pre-approved
by BGE prior to installation. Species,quantities and planting specifications for the identified shoreline
mitigation area are provided in the following table.The conceptual planting plan is depicted in the
figures at the end of this report.
Species Common Name Quantity Spacing Size Min
Rhododendron macrophyllum Rhododendron 11 5 ft o.c. 5 gal
Gaultheria shallop Sala! 20 2 ft o.c. 1 gal
Pinus contorta Spaans Dwarf Shore Pine 5 6 ft o.c. 5 gal
Symphoricarpos a/bus Red Osier Dogwood 60 18 in o.c. Live stakes
Additional native species should be incorporated into the structural landscaping around the deck or
as otherwise improved over the life span of the structure. Use of native species provides a landscape
of native and naturalized species habitat, materials surplus and sink, low maintenance gardens and
plant bases with ecoregional tolerances to temporal variations in the climate. There are multiple
resources available for native gardening and landscaping for wildlife. BGE encourages the land owner
to do some independent research on the subject to implement a continued practice for sound
stewardship to the property and Kitsap Lake.
Maintenance
Maintenance of the mitigation area shall consist of any and all actions necessary to promote survival
of the planted species. Actions may include irrigation during the dry season and mulching. Limbing
and trimming is acceptable. When trimming and pruning the top of slope buffer, pile the debris in an
area somewhere within the property to create a brush shelter. Tucking the trimmings beneath the
shrubs is a perfect option. Downed wood,even a pile of twigs provides food and shelter to many
species,while slowly retuning nutrients to the soil. The pile can be in the sun or the shade, place it in
an unused area of the property. Remove starts of invasive species immediately.
Limit the use of herbicides or pesticides particularly near the areas of berry,fruit or mast producing
shrubs or trees.This will help ensure the availability of foraging for wildlife. Even fertilizing lawn can
degrade nutrients and alter the decomposition process of the natural grasses. Limit the use of
insecticides. Insect populations are important on many ecological levels particularly as a food source
for insectivores.
Monitoring
The buffer restoration shall include an as-built document created and submitted within 60 days of
planting. The document may consist of a summary of actions as they pertain to the restoration efforts
defined in this mitigation plan. A list of planted species,time of installation and supporting
photographs, before and after installation, should accompany the document. Once complete no
additional monitoring is necessary so long as maintenance is continued to ensure survival of
vegetation materials and growth continues to produce a shrub complex.
Five years post planting,a review of mitigation and compliance documents should be provided to the
City of Bremerton.The compliance documents should be a determination of success in regard to
vegetation coverage, health and sustainability.The assessment may evaluate, but not be limited to,
obsery itinnc of cneripc cl Irvi, I roninrmmant vnantetinn r -z- __ _
completed to support the success of the restored shoreline buffer(irrigation,trimming,fertilizer use,
etc.). It may include an estimate of buffer area restoration and quantification of,if any,addition use
of native vegetation which promotes ecoregional function within the landscape.
r
ZV
08
QO
,; vv
O
r?r
da. O O
Ol
UleOri
Z0 NrJz pr a rH CO pa 'r'3 �i � � ��' r �c a ,�r al�`�, �ae* y:� F. s'y xnr,.: i „� 'S fs Os ".di °yifie �,. 43 W,v,,,-.• } fi s4EgaFP; r r°,, > k, .
rl
a T
J
ITf A J -9 •t
J
J
Q
f 0
O
i CO
W'-'f *,
C V 01
Z � W3
g
ae Z
� CC0uj O
s$Q uuLnW
0 t
Z 0 W
CC
W CO
W
N
CA
/
I
01
C
ICesC
es
_ A
s, 47
C
# ' O
L pp
12 A
a V
3
`5
r
mW Oo ON .__ _.____-' HO 7
O u 01 c?:
en
ca-w0OO
0 otny0Zd n-
o
in
<ill J
J
J
Q
D 0
O }- wm
OZ (-)
01
Lu V Q
z0W3
FE Ce Z
LU CL CL 0
CC
= w to
u.
of < VOw
f Z ce
w
w m
>
w
I—
w
! � � �� ISI � �Iiili II i ! I 1
t !u.1 I.I I
12
J I
L
0 t
ccQ
QC
i
17
d .a
ados- 0 3
f do-doj
_, 1,..,
PuegaM HI tio2a2e3
H40WMH•
I
O
N Z
_- z
a
m
o ? t. O
o « z O O
1-4 m ell
Z In m
0
�n 2 ! 0'0
a c
< W O
oa
m0
w O
z
O
U
(7----1---
I J
Q
i 0 O
0i- w �
ULaU °r'
wUa
U W
z
wQ Q.
� O O
m °6la m0w
ZCC
La CO
W
i-
(i)N
N
To co
Y
v.
LA
111111111 111'11,1 '11 III pliiiiill : 111 I'', ri 1:1 ii IP"
u 1 [[!! II 1E u ` 7 1 I {1
bp Er. trs c
i E! "? k ! j ii �i' ijW i Ali ( I f; c0 C � G
12
..6
„11
,1 , 10, ,i. 1 ,
1 , i
N
0 0 f0 le
..I3
-0 '° as
0 O -QJ i m
O C N 0
N
'Aim •
REFERENCES
City of Bremerton Municipal Code. September 25, 2015.
http://www.codepublishinq.com/WA/Bremerton/#!/Bremerton20/Bremerton20.html
City of Bremerton Shoreline Master Program. Dec. 4, 2013. Number 5229.
http://www.bremertonwa.gov/DocumentCenter/HomeNiew/1966
Parametrix. 2012. City of Bremerton Shoreline Master Program Shoreline Inventory and Analysis.
Prepared by Parametrix, Bellevue, Washington. May 2012
http://www.bremertonwa.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/571
Sound Native Plants. Plant Quantity Calculator. http://soundnativeplants.com/nursery/plant-
quantity-calculator/
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species Report. September 25,
2015. PHS on the Web.
http://apps.wdfw.wa.qov/phsontheweb/jasper/jasper/PHSPIus.pdf?paramClipArea ID=P1509251222
41&clipPolvReportUrl=http://aispublic.dfw.wa.qov/aasoutputfwq/Geoprocessing5ervices/ExportWeb
Map GPServer/ aqs 2d249349cf69490ea7c0cbea1213f5cf.pdf&phsReportlayerCode=3
estimating width and coverage for Wetland Rating Determination.
i
s!-
0 E
15 ft
5 Blue Bron P!
• e11
y
U
414 t7og:
N
1
O
f
f
IRA
Sa
. nd./Per pi..
4
0.
$
4
i
0 , ) .
,, O
0
.
Aes."\ MCDOUGALL 1 ( . 1
i+S -dam .-
•
1 g
rc
1
n
N
0
r
At
�"\ MCDOUGALL \ ( 1
1
- E73 Assessed Waters/Sediment p
1‘ 0 Water
Category 5 - 303d
Category 4C
C 41100 ategory 4B
x ;.
..4R«PR#.9R«•••$a .1,w
Category 4A
r
Category 2 ,
Category 1
a
Sediment !
® Category 5 - 303d
® Category 4C
ti
® Category 4B
1 ® Category 4A
Category 2
y %
Min I 11111 JUIIMVIA ►IRT — vresiern vvasnington
Name of wetland(or ID#): Kitsap Lake-Osprey Circle Date of site visit: 07.27.16
Rated by R.Myers BGE Environmental Trained by Ecology? O Yes 0 No Date of training 11-Sep
HGM Class used for rating Lake Fringe Wetland has multiple HGM classes? 0 Yes 0 No
NOTE:Form is not complete with out the figures requested(figures can be combined).
Source of base aerial photo/map NWI and Bing Maps
OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY III (based on functions p or special characteristics ❑ )
1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS
Category I-Total score=23-27 Score for each
Category II-Total score=20-22 function based
X Category III-Total score=16-19 on three
Category IV-Total score=9-15 ratings
(order of ratings
FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat is not
Water Quality important)
List appropriate rating(H, M, L)
Site Potential M L M 9=H,H,H
Landscape Potential H M L 8=H,H,M
Value H L H Total 7=H,H, L
Score Based on8 4 6 18 7=H,M,M
Ratings 6=H,M, L
6=M,M,M
5=H,L,L
5=M,M,L
4=M, L, L
3=L,L,L
2.Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland
CHARACTERISTIC Category
Estuarine
Wetland of High Conservation Value
Bog
Mature Forest
Old Growth Forest
Coastal Lagoon
Interdunal
None of the above X
Deoressional Wetlands
Map of: To answer questions: Figure 1
Cowardin plant classes D 1.3,H 1.1,H 1.4
Hydroperiods 0 1.4,H 1.2
Location of outlet(can be added to map of hydnaperiods) D 1.1,D 4.1
Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to another figure) D 2.2,D 5.2
Map of the contributing basin D 4.3,D 5.3
1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3
polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat
Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) D 3.1,D 3.2
Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) D 3.3
Riverine Wetlands
Map of: To answer questions: Figure 1
Cowardin plant classes H 1.1,H 1.4
Hydroperiods H 1.2
Ponded depressions R 1.1
Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to another figure) R 2.4
Plant cover of trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants R 1.2,R 4.2
Width of unit vs.width of stream(can be added to another figure) R 4.1
Map of the contributing basin R 2.2,R 2.3,R 5.2
1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3
polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat
Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) R 3.1
Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) R 3.2,R 3.3
Lake Fringe Wetlands
Map of: To answer questions: Figure 1
Cowardin plant classes L 1.1,L 4.1,H 1.1,H 1.4 1
Plant cover of trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants L 1.2 1
Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to another figure) L 2.2 1
1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3 2
polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat
Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) L 3.1,L 3.2 3
Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) L 3.3 3
Slope Wetlands
Map of: To answer questions: Figure 1
Cowardin plant classes H 1.1,H 1.4
Hydroperiods H 1.2
Plant cover of dense trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants S 1.3
Plant cover of dense,rigid trees,shrubs,and herbaceous plants S 4.1
(can be added to another figure)
Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland(can be added to another figure) S 2.1,S 5.1
1 km Polygon:Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge-including H 2.1,H 2.2,H 2.3
polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat
Screen capture of map of 303(d)listed waters in basin(from Ecology website) S 3.1,S 3.2
Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found(from web) 5 3.3
For questions 1 -7,the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated.
If hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated,you probably have a unit
with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1 -7 apply,and go to
Question 8.
1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods?
O NO-go to 2 0 YES-the wetland class is Tidal Fringe-go to 1.1
1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per thousand)?
❑ NO-Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine) ❑YES-Freshwater Tidal Fringe
If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands.
If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be
used to scone functions for estuarine wetlands.
2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source(>90%)of water to it.
Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit.
0 NO-go to 3 0 YES-The wetland class is Flats
If your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands.
3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
0 The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water(without any
plants on the surface at any time of the year)at least 20 ac(8 ha)in size;
0 At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m).
❑ NO-go to 4 0 YES-The wetland class is Lake Fringe(Lacustrine Fringe)
4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
❑ The wetland is on a slope(slope can be very gradual),
El The water flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional)and usually comes from seeps.
It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks.
❑ The water leaves the wetland without being impounded.
0 NO-go to 5 ❑YES-The wetland class is Slope
NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow
depressions or behind hummocks(depressions are usually<3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep).
5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
0 The unit is in a valley, or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding
from that stream or river,
❑ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years.
O NO-go to 6 ❑YES-The wetland class is Riverine
NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding.
some time during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland.
0 NO-go to 7 ❑YES-The wetland class is Depressional
7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding?
The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high
groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet.
L7 NO-go to 8 E YES-The wetland class is Depressional
8.Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For
example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a
Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE
HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT
(make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for
the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored.
NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10%or more of
the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10%
of the unit;classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90%of the total area.
HGM classes within the wetland unit HGM class to
being rated use in rating
Slope+Riverine Riverine
Slope+ Depressional Depressional
Slope+Lake Fringe Lake Fringe
Depressional+Riverine along stream Depressional
within boundary of depression
Depressional+Lake Fringe Depressional
Riverine+ Lake Fringe Riverine
Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other Treat as
class of freshwater wetland ESTUARINE
If you are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than
2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating.
,
L 1.U. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality?
L 1.1.Average width of plants along the lakeshore(use polygons of Cowardin classes):
Plants are more than 33 ft(10 m)wide points=6
Plants are more than 16 ft(5 m)wide and<33 ft points=3 1
Plants are more than 6 ft(2 m)wide and< 16 ft points= 1
Plants are less than 6 ft wide points=0
L 1.2. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland: Choose the appropriate description that results
in the highest points, and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage. The
herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form or as an understory in a shrub or forest
community. These are not Cowardin classes.Area of cover is total cover in the unit, but it can be
in patches. Herbaceous does not include aquatic bed.
Cover of herbaceous plants is>90%of the vegetated area points=6
Cover of herbaceous plants is>2/3 of the vegetated area points=4 6
❑ Cover of herbaceous plants is> 1/3 of the vegetated area points=3
❑ Other plants that are not aquatic bed>2/3 unit points=3
Other plants that are not aquatic bed in> 1/3 vegetated area points= 1
Aquatic bed plants and open water cover>2/3 of the unit points=0
Total for L 1 Add the points in the boxes above 7
Rating of Site Potential If score is: ❑8-12=H 0 4-7=M El 0-3=L Record the rating on the first page
L 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site?
L 2.1. Is the lake used by power boats? Yes= 1 No=0 1
L 2.2. Is> 10%of the area within 150 ft of wetland unit on the upland side in
land uses that generate pollutants? Yes= 1 No=0 1
L 2.3. Does the lake have problems with algal blooms or excessive plant
growth such as milfoil? Yes= 1 No=0 1
Total for L 2 Add the points in the boxes above 3
Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 0 2 or 3=H ❑1 =M ❑0=L Record the rating on the first page
L 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society?
L 3.1. Is the lake on the 303(d) list of degraded aquatic resources? Yes= 1 No=0 1
L 3.2. Is the lake in a sub-basin where water quality is an issue(at least one
aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list)? Yes= 1 No=0 1
L 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for
maintaining water quality?Answer YES if them is a TMDL for the lake or 2
basin in which the unit is found. Yes=2 No=0
Total for L 3 Add the points in the boxes above 4
Rating of Value If score is: l ] 2-4=H 0 1 =M ❑ 0=L Record the rating on the first page
L 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion?
L 4.1. Distance along shore and average width of Cowardin classes along the lakeshore
(do not include Aquatic bed): Choose the highest scoring description that matches conditions in
the wetland.
>'/4 of distance is Scrub-shrub or Forested at least 33 ft(10 m)wide points=6 0
❑ >%of distance is Scrub-shrub or Forested at least 6 ft(2 m)wide points=4
El >%distance is Scrub-shrub or Forested at least 33 ft(10 m)wide points=4
Plants are at least 6 ft(2 m)wide(any type except Aquatic bed) points=2
Plants are less than 6 ft(2 m)wide(any type except Aquatic bed) points=0
Rating of Site Potential If score is: 0 6=m n 0-5=L Record the rating on the first page
L 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site?
L 5.1. Is the lake used by power boats with more than 10 hp? Yes= 1 No=0 1
L 5.2. Is the fetch on the lake side of the unit at least 1 mile in distance? Yes= 1 No=0 0
Total for L 5 Add the points in the boxes above 1
Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: ❑2=H [MI =m ❑0=L Record the rating on the first page
L 6.0.Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society?
L 6.1.Are there resources along the shore that can be impacted by erosion? If more than one
resource is present, choose the one with the highest score.
There are human structures or old growth/mature forests within 25 ft
of OHWM of the shore in the unit points=2
El There are nature trails or other paths and recreational activities 2
within 25 ft of OHWM points= 1
El Other resources that could be impacted by erosion points= 1
There are no resources that can be impacted by erosion along the
shores of the unit points=0
Rating of Value If score is: 0 2=H ❑1 =M E 0=L Record the rating on the first page
NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
Evaluations of vegetation and extent of the lake fringe unit are based on observations from the existing parcel
and personal knowledge of the conditions of the lakes shoreline, by use.
r
H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the
Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be
combined for each class to meet the threshold of Yd ac or more than 10%of the unit if it is smaller
than 25 ac.Add the number of structures checked.
❑ Aquatic bed 4 structures or more:points=4
O
Emergent 2
g 3 structures: points=2
CJ Scrub-shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) 2 structures: points-1
Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) 1 structure: points=0
If the unit has a Forested class, check if:
❑ The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous,
moss/ground-coverl that each cover 20%within the Forested polygon
H 1.2. Hydroperiods
Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime
has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or%ac to count(see text for descriptions of
hydroperiods).
O Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points=3
❑ Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points=2 1
❑ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points= 1
❑ Saturated only 1 types present: points=0
❑ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to,the wetland
❑ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to,the wetland
❑ Lake Fringe wetland 2 points
El Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points
H 1.3. Richness of plant species
Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2.
Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do
not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoll, reed canarygrass,purple
loosestrife, Canadian thistle 2
If you counted: > 19 species points=2
5-19 species points= 1
<5 species points=0
H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats
Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes
(described in H 1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)
is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open
water, the rating is always high.
C-C=>
2
None=0 points Low= 1 point Moderate=2 points
All three diagrams
in this row are
HIGH = 3 points Ar
LJ a-OIyG, VVI.IGV vew.d7 VGV11J•SII UII II IG vGLIg11V V" 7 III' IIaII IGIGI as IV V 1I IVIlw
❑ Standing snags(dbh >4 in)within the wetland
❑ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2 m)and/or overhanging plants extends
at least 3.3 ft(1 m)over a stream (or ditch)in, or contiguous with the wetland,for at
least 33 ft(10 m) 1
❑ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning
(>30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees
that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed)
❑ At least%ac of thin-stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas
that are permanently or seasonally inundated(structures for egg-laying by amphibians)
CI Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in every stratum of plants(see
H 1.1 for list of strata)
Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above, 8
Rating of Site Potential If Score is: ❑15-18=H El 7-14=M [JO-6=L Record the rating on the first page
H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat function of the site?
H 2.1 Accessible habitat(include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit).
Calculate:
0 %undisturbed habitat + ( 25 %moderate&low intensity land uses/2)=12.5%
If total accessible habitat is: 1
> 1/3(33.3%)of 1 km Polygon points=3
20-33%of 1 km Polygon points=2
10-19%of 1 km Polygon points= 1
< 10%of 1 km Polygon points=0
H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland.
Calculate:
25 %undisturbed habitat + ( 25 %moderate&low intensity land uses/2)=37.5%
Undisturbed habitat>50%of Polygon points=3 1
Undisturbed habitat 10-50%and in 1-3 patches points=2
Undisturbed habitat 10-50%and>3 patches points= 1
Undisturbed habitat< 10%of 1 km Polygon points=0
H 2.3 Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If
>50%of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points=(-2) -2
5 50%of 1km Polygon is high intensity points=0
Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 0
Rating of Landscape Potential If Score is: ❑4-6=H ❑ i -3=M E<1 =L Record the rating on the first page
H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society?
H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose
only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated.
Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points=2
❑ It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page)
❑ It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species(any plant
or animal on the state or federal lists)
2 It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species 2
❑ It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the
Department of Natural Resources
❑ it has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or
regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a
watershed plan
Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats(listed on next page)with in 100m points= 1
Site does not meet any of the criteria above points=0
Ise..-..:.. I-7n—u ri • —•• r1I
y i
-^ �- -. ...•i.•.i.vi i 1011 al v Vaurua, Ltwo. rri(rny rraorrat and pecies
List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00165/wdfw00165.odf or access the list from here:
http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/phs/list/
Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft(100 m)of the wetland unit: NOTE: This
question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat.
El Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac(0.4 ha).
Biodiversity Areas and Corridors:Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species
of native fish and wildlife(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report).
El Herbaceous Raids:Variable size patches of grass and forts on shallow soils over bedrock.
El Old-growth/Mature forests:Old-growth west of Cascade crest—Stands of at least 2 tree species,
forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/ac(20 trees/ha)
>32 in(81 cm)dbh or>200 years of age. Mature forests—Stands with average diameters
exceeding 21 in (53 cm)dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of
snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80-200
years old west of the Cascade crest.
❑ Oregon White Oak:Woodland stands of pure oak or oakkonifer associations where canopy
coverage of the oak component is important(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158—see
web link above).
❑ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both
aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other.
El Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a
dry prairie or a wet prairie(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161—see web link above).
❑ Instream: The combination of physical, biological,and chemical processes and conditions that
interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources.
❑ Nearshore:Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open
Coast Nearshore,and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of
relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report—see web link on previous page).
El Caves:A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void,or system of interconnected passages under the
earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human.
❑ Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft(7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation.
Cl Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5-6.5 ft(0.15-2.0 m),
composed of basalt,andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May
be associated with cliffs.
❑ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay
characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast
height of>20 in(51 cm) in western Washington and are>6.5 ft(2 m) in height. Priority logs are> 12
in (30 cm)in diameter at the largest end, and>20 ft(6 m)long.
Note:All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are
addressed elsewhere.
Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. List the category when the appropriate criteria are met.
SC 1.0. Estuarine Wetlands
Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands?
❑ The dominant water regime is tidal,
❑ Vegetated, and
O With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt
0 Yes-Go to SC 1.1 0 No=Not an estuarine wetland
SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary
Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific
Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151?
❑ Yes=Category I 0 No-Go to SC 1.2
SC 1.2. Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions?
O The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing,
and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are
Spartina, see page 25)
O At least' of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un,
grazed or un-mowed grassland.
❑ The wetland has at least two of the following features:tidal channels, depressions with
open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands.
El Yes=Category I 0 No=Category II
SC 2.0.Wetlands of High Conservation Value(WHCV)
SC 2.1. Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list
of Wetlands of High Conservation Value?
0 Yes-Go to SC 2.2 El No-Go to SC 2.3
SC 2.2. Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value?
❑ Yes=Category I 0 No=Not WHCV
SC 2.3. Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland?
http://wwwl.dnr.wa.gov/nho/refdesk/datasearch/wnhpwetlands.pdf
0 Yes-Contact WNHP/WDNR and to SC 2.4 El No=Not WHCV
SC 2.4. Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation
Value and listed it on their website?
❑ Yes=Category I ❑ No=Not WHCV
SC 3.0.Bogs
Does the wetland(or any part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation
in bogs? Use the key below. If you answer YES you will still need to rate the
wetland based on its functions.
SC 3.1. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons, either peats or mucks,
that compose 16 in or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile?
❑ Yes-Go to SC 3.3 0 No-Go to SC 3.2
SC 3.2. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils,either peats or mucks,that are
less than 16 in deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic
ash, or that are floating on top of a lake or pond?
❑Yes-Go to SC 3.3 0 No=Is not a bog
SC 3.3. Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground
level,AND at least a 30%cover of plant species listed in Table 4?
❑ Yes=Is a Category I bog ❑ No-Go to SC 3.4
NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory, you may
substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at
least 16 in deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present,
the wetland is a bog.
SC 3.4. Is an area with pests or mucks forested(> 30%cover)with Sitka spruce, subalpine fir,
western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Engelmann
spruce, or western white pine,AND any of the species(or combination of species)listed
in Table 4 provide more than 30%of the cover under the canopy?
Y
vYVIIJ.
0 Old-growth forests(west of Cascade crest): Stands of at least two tree species,
forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/ac
(20 trees/ha)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height
(dbh)of 32 in (81 cm)or more.
❑ Mature forests(west of the Cascade Crest):Stands where the largest trees are 80-
200 years old OR the species that make up the canopy have an average diameter(dbh)
exceeding 21 in(53 cm).
0 Yes=Category 1 0 No= Not a forested wetland for this section
SC 5.0.Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons
Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon?
0 The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially
separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently,
rocks
❑ The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or
brackish (>0.5 ppt)during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to
be measured near the bottom)
❑ Yes-Go to SC 5.1 0 No=Not a wetland in a coastal lagoon
SC 5.1. Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions?
❑ The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking, ditching,filling, cultivation, grazing),
and has less than 20%cover of aggressive, opportunistic plant species(see list of
species on p. 100).
❑ At least' of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un-
grazed or un-mowed grassland.
0 The wetland is larger than 1/10 ac(4350 ft2)
❑Yes=Category I ❑ No=Category H
SC 6.0.Interdunal Wetlands
Is the wetland west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland
Ownership or WBUO)?If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland
based on its habitat functions.
In practical terms that means the following geographic areas:
0 Long Beach Peninsula: Lands west of SR 103
0 Grayland-Westport: Lands west of SR 105
0 Ocean Shores-Copalis: Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109
❑ Yes-Go to SC 6.1 0 No= Not an interdunal wetland for rating
SC 6.1. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or 9 for the habitat functions on the form
(rates H,H,H or H,H,M for the three aspects of function)?
❑ Yes=Category I ❑ No-Go to SC 6.2
SC 6.2. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger?
0 Yes=Category II ❑ No-Go to SC 6.3
SC 6.3. Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and
1 ac?
0 Yes=Category III ❑ No=Category IV
Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics
If you answered No for all types, enter"Not Applicable"on Summary Form
- ."8
c.II€, £NVIR.ONM£NTAL, LLC..
Wetland Consulting and Land Use planning
2102 5rashem Ave
5remerton, WA 98310