The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About18TH ST., 1308 ' ` City of Bre�erto�a � Department of Community Development � �E�� 345 - 6`h Street, S�ite 600 G5ty of Bremert� - Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 I �� 20'2 P6one: (360) 473-5275 °s° '• • - — ---� ve arnnentof �+'��[: 360 473-527� Community Developmest �7��'Ir� �� 74��'� 1 �� Applicant: a. , o � a r�.a,� 8w 1c�a�,� File#: P�/o� O 0�5� Permit: ❑ Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance � Exemption � Revision INAC 173-27-180: A complete application for a substantial development, conditional use, or variance permit sha/l contain, as a minimum, the following information: 4 19VFORMATION NOTES APPLICATION FORnfi: 1 Applicant's name, address, phone number.' .p ✓ 2 Contact person's name, address, phone ,4 Number if other than applicant. 3 Property owner's name, address, phone � number, if other than applicant. ✓ 4 Fair market value of the project. ��_ � 5 Location of property, including: address; section, township, range to nearest quarter or quarter section, or latitude/longitude to nearest minute. Q 5-e� �A{LPP� 6 Name of shoreline/wetlands which development is ro osed to be within 200 feet. 1,� 5�� 7 General description of proposed project Including: proposed use/uses;activities ✓ necessa to accom lish ro'ect. ' btsr..-- J �P� 8 General description of property as it now exists including: physical characteristics; � im rovements and structures. � � �— 9 General description of vicinity of proposed project including: identification of adjacent uses, structures and improvements; intensity of � develo ment; ph sical characteristics. � � (e.p�,�.e� S 'The applicant should be the owner of the property or the primary proponent of the project and not the represerrtative of the owner or prima'ry proponent. SHORELINE PERMIT SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Page 1 of 2 � ' (: � ��o��Lon�� i-r su�nni�-r�� cH�c�cLis-r 10 SITE DEVELOPMEMT PLAIN: A Boundary of parcel(s)of land upon which develo ment is ro osed. B Ordinary high water mark(OHWM)of all water bodies located adjacent to or within boundary of ro'ect.' ��- �-�— lu,w� C Existing and proposed land contours.2 D Delineation of all wetland areas that will be altered or used as art of develo ment. N E General indication of character of vegetation found on site. �:wa-� b-�-e- C-,�cs.�c,1•� F Dimensions and locations of all existing and proposed structures and improvements including: buildings; paved/graveled areas; roads; utilities; septic tanks and drainfields; material stockpiles or surcharge; stormwater ✓ mana ement faci�ities. l.co�� s�� P�� ✓ G Where applicable: landscaping plan for project. N � H Where applicable: plans for development of areas on or off site as mitigation for impacts associated with proposed project which contain information consistent with these application ✓ re uirements. iAr I Quantity, source and composition of any fill material placed on site whether temporary or ermanent. J G-�— �,�-.� J Quantity, composition and destination of any �/ excavated or dred ed material. �J liY K Vicinity map showing relationship of property and proposed development or use to roads, ✓ utilities, existing developments and uses on ad'acent ro erties. L Where applicable: depiction of impacts to views ✓ from existin residential uses and ublic areas. �U p M Variance applications—clearly indicate:where development could occur without approval of a variance; physical features and circumstances on property that provide a basis fro the request; location of ad'acent structures and uses. ��r.�,�Q.� �,o�.l,.— 3I 3o I i v Applic s Signature Date Loqtion of OHWM may be an approximate location, except;for any development where a determination of consistency with applicable regulations requires a preclse tocation of the OHWM.The mark shall be located precisely and the biological and hydrological basis for the location as indicated on the plans shall be induded in the development plan. Where the OHWM is neither adjacent to nor within the boundary of the project,the plan shall indicate the distance and direction to the nearest ordinary high water mark of a shoreline. WAC 173-27-180(9)(b). 2 Land contours shall be at intervals sufficient to accurately determine the existing character of the property and the extent of proposed change to the land that is necessary for the development.Areas,within the boundary that will not be altered by the development maybe indicated as such and contours approximated for the area. SHORELINE PERMIT SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Page 2 of 2 i I _.ZL L(C ��/Y � ..�-�-.._.-�oR�f" �r�4s H�►NG"�o� 1V�4RRaws �-�..., , ! ri�1�V r?�ck Qc�.kH£�9+� &�rs�i G� � ' RE��u co tR� 4' . �� `-�" t147= �cr� R�r.�H-� _ , _ �� . . � ` GRpuE+�S u I '�� --:_" h'��kf� �--. y` � I Ft�A � I . \. � Ede .� � �-..�_. � 3gc�� SMoR��,�� • '`�"� �.. . ; � �_ � I �� `pI �� *S�� '� .�.1.fL/ ��t�S..r"' � S�, , � W D 1�NE�2 S � , ' N4�s� � - � � � � i i i I . � � P�t�aw�FV � � � , I ' : C � � , � . �1�.� ' z- . . . . , . ° � SGAI.E: /� �OJ pRAWN BY DRAWIN� 1UMBER � , ' DAT[: � � �r REYISED I N�A Y 17 Op11J�p1�nM�in �IN�nM w/OqUOq14T, . II i .� rf�I�6�!- �4�1 ' �//G/N/r1"� M�� '. sc r� s � :.3 � . � , � � � � � AR�l� ; , '�K � � i � .d.� � —• � �- +6 S Qo�T' w�45�i�Vb�oN • ,� ° �� rt�rsr� N�'��vs ._ 3 D� D .�. n►�Hv �o � � Ft�T�R ±�' � F�t3r?rG iP sT s 3 �d � o 4�N�AN ' . o': � Qa,4RR�J Q sP��s . , ' o T� 5 � ��``� , . M� o � d��'�n�'�1 o1�r t3 , � i � � i � ; � I Is---�- tu' -,---..'►F,� � � � -.�t I � i I . ; . , . ' c . . . --�- �.K��., w 1-r�� . . _. • SGALE: p DRAWN BY DRAWfNG fdUMBER , DATE: IiEVISED Q2 2 BYS X 77 PRINTEp ON N0.t00pH CLRARPAIM'• • j i I i � plArv�-t ivC� '�L� � }'�1oa�t5 w��\ ►x �+n��•\�.c� wt;�nin b' ��S�u,�'.� o�,-cc�. � S's,�scv� �c�2 0� �va1�4�.+�o.d 1a,n�i��1. -�pso�� w�� h� ' brov�ti.+ tv� �to (�oX�to�lla-� c�� p bt�ll�l�•-Qud r-ac�s y�, �lo a��w.� ptaw.+ �v�s�a.tta.�a�-t ar�t/ati- Sprc4et,r�� . � �-- --._.--�----- - ----- ------- -- - - .. -- �---- --- ----- I - � '�cp�acann�x�h- ��Khec�d ' � �;..t . � rn g� � . •� � �. o�' • � . ' �;y.. • �:•� t� I ;?, .,5' � � _ � , •> �•w,-�rs.� ;g,. :%`�;i '��vs:: �� - :0 `�� ' st:- . .� � ?,•r � � Yi � °�'� � � �� c� - . o �- � � I � � � . �a� o�u-�• � � �` � i � Kirri�K��nnic_K fi;'r� ��►-�/�t�►�r�y � ; ' I ,,.. � L:� �hoW�Jr V��11 � �MOu"S4�Ma'''��Ola ' � � lv��n'�o:,v�t'�xu�s1, � �'�'P�"'f'� d`'r,�"`�ood � ,I �' Y°''rr� � Na'�;�- P1wn-4S �t�o �a. �r1S�ta11R,c �w r�arn►rv�.v�do..-�'t� � i -�'y�xr� 11�r5C,✓�. �My �(J2C,�cS uhC.vaidabin. G��- 'w�� -'t�rnx.. � � SWcsrd�r.rr1 v�iy\ �. Su}�S-1i'�d�c�+ W�'� S�v�rula.r f1o�� Plav`-�-. : �¢. o Ccx�Ls-� : t'Tr' ' ��2ad t+��4�{n R,oCK. �U1K_ Itiw.�, . ''"� � � � SGALE: 1�1-� �Q� DRAWN BY DRAWINC-hlUMBER ■ DATE: 5 �Z REVISED t l I B%a X 11 PRINTED ON NO.t000H CLEARPRINT o . n� � a a � i �� ______ �� (�ty of Bremerto�PE�IT CENTER APR 0 � 2012 � � O RESIDENTIAL ; . .• � �`�'ar�eato� Building Permit Application Community Develogment llenarlment of Commuiucv Developmcnt` 395-6d�Strcet,Suitc:600 ' Bremerton 'WA' 98337-1873 (3G0} �.73-5275 ' Faa(36Q) 4•73-5278 ' �ti�+�+�.ci.bremcrton.�+:�.us Applicant ❑ O�vner ❑ Contractor �Authori7xd Agent Site Address: 130$ IL�'� 4� 3rcNv.�,.�n v.� Q�33'� To apply for a property address,contad Public Works at(360)473-5270 CONTRACTOR:5�, u,� OWNER: �.-�k Address: o W S Address: � �3 �► st• Ci , State, Zi : g�Fb Ci , State, Zi : qY�3� License#&Ex . Date: 5�A L� Phone#: p 2- I Contact Name: n Authorized Agent Name: � Contact Phone#: alo.o Zq - v�l Address: �x 3 Email address: ,csr Cit , State, Zi : K� b Tax ID/Parcel#: --oo�-oo�-000to Phone#: (��o) o� ❑ Sewer ❑ Septic Email address: n l,we.l .cum What is the application for? (Please check) New Construction ❑Alteration ❑ Addition �NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE � RESIDENTIAL REBUILD $*+,1Kl�cld ✓ _ C�� NEW DUPLEX ❑ RESIDENTIAL ADDITION � r"�� ,, �NEW MANUFACTURED HOME �RESIDENTIAL REPAIR � �NEW GARAGE/CARPORT ❑ NEW ACCESSORY BUILDING � pl.d�c.r o� � DEMOLITION sf Interior sf Exterior" sf Foundation Wall'* sf Roof I Section*' '*Separate demolition permit and fees required. Contact Public Works for sewer cap permit(47&5270). Sewer must be capped prior to demoli6on permit issuance. Q OTHER: /S THlS PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SHOREL/NE? YE5�, NO ❑ Scope of work proposed: �1�� exis�k� 'h��o' cav�trt�k--bwac�,..aa�d��+'�o. -�CX bLLr�ar� — Square Footage: Building: 1st Floor Basement Garage: �St Fioo� � 2nd Floor Other � 2nd Floor ��'• `��3� . Deck(s): Valuation Plan Review Fee Permit Fee Surcharge Total Fees r �c� o o � cCud� `�J� � JJ� � ' � �oZ . S�are[�rce - � Application for whiG�no permit is issued within 18 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation,and plans and other data (!1C-Ev�� 9�' i submitted for review may thereafter be retumed t e applicant or destroyed by the building official. The building oificial may extend the time for ac6ort by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days on request by the applicant,showing that arcumstances beyond the cantrol of the applicant have prevented adion from being taken. No applicant shatl be extended more than once. In order to renew action on an application after expiration,the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee. 313o1� v App' nYs Sig ature (Print) Date T Rev.Oct.2008 (Continued on back) �3Z 3'J"' ' . � '4' CITY OF BREMERTunI PERMIT NUMBER: BB12 00152 �'_�_ ,.�.. _ .d.,�. F :I; DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE ISSUED: F: 1Y- ;� � f�7 1j; _, I �'�' 345-6th Street,Bremerton,WA 98337 �:,.�:�:F��«;Y ;•`.,`�:.:; �'^"�'��"'+��''�f'�'j: (360)473-5275 Fax:(360)473-5278 y��`ir�y�s-i_ac "_ "_ _. _.._. .... .- -. .._ . -" .... ....__ _ ' _ _"_ ' ' __- � � � I ASSESSOR NUMBER: 3708-007-001-0006 ZONING: R10 SITE ADDRESS: 1308 18TH ST i iAPPLICANT NAME: STITT GUY A&MARY ANN PHONE: (360)792-1542 ADDRESS: 1308 18TH ST,BREMERTON,WA 98337 OWNER NAME: STITT GUY A&MARY ANN PHONE: (360)792-1542 ADDRESS: 1308 18TH ST,BREMERTON,WA 98337 CONTRACTOR: SEALEVEL BULKHEAD BUILDERS PHONE: (360)297-2401 ADDRESS: PO BOX 375,KINGSTON,WA 98346 LENDER NAME: PHONE: ADDRESS: � . � ; SUBMITTED: 04/03/2012 APPROVED: EXPIRATION: 09/30/2012 STATUS: PENDING i VALUATION: $47,000.00 Building Permit-No Mechanical/Plumbing Building Permit $550.00 227� REPLRCE EXISTING CONCRETE BULKHEAD WITH A ROCK BULKHEAD I Plan Review Fee $357.50 16-4580 Building Code Edition: ; State Surcharge $4.50 ozas Occupancy Group: . �� [] H�� Q e Shoreline Exemption $100 00 4582 Type of Construction: . � �� ❑ FIRE ❑ ' SEPA Checklist $320.00 4583 FIOOd ZOfI@: � � �� TOTAL FEES: $i,332.00 Setbacks: D � Sanitation Method: � e � " ` e � �L1 Number of Bedrooms: �--� d � � � `��` J � a �e L�CI i s�-J � � SY1.�Pe �rYl � �X�✓v► fi oVt �� `'�V�ii r ✓\ �/��G��-�"i L(.(' , TOTAL I I t J Square Footage: Bid Pr' e from Applicant p i 1C� ` Inspection Requests FIRE:Fir nspections (360)473-5386 DCD:Building Inspections (360)473-5870 HEALTH:Ki County alth District (360)337-528 L&I:Department of Labor and Industries (360)415-4000 PW&U:Public Works-E gineering (360)473-52 This permit shall become null and void if ihe described work authorized by this permit has not commenced within 180 days from the ance,or if the nded or I abandoned at any hme after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. It is the responsibility of the permit holder to see that the required inspections are made. Failure to obtain � required inspections may result in stoppage oi the work until such time that the permd holder can susbstantiate to the City of Bremerton that the concealed work meets or exceeds code � requirements. Any demoliGon,testing,or financial burden shall be borne directly by the pertnit holder. Failure to substantiate code reqwrements will indemnify the City against any and all �i responsibility or liability connected with the construction. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type oi work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to wolate or cancel prowsions of any State or local law regulating construction or the performance of the construction If listing the owner as general contractor,I certify that I am exempt from ihe requirements of the State Contractors Registration Law under Section 3,Chapter 126,Laws of 1967. All revisions to an approved plan reqwre DCD review and approval prior to performing work. All building and tenant occupancy permits are required to pass final inspeclion prior to permit expiration and obtain a certificate of occupancy prior to use or occupancy. I have read,and agree to abide by the conditions of this permit including all conditions of zoning,building codes,and State and Federel laws. , SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AGENT: i PRINTED NAME: DATE: CONDITIONS City of Bremerton's approval of this application pertains only to the City's regulatory jurisdiction,and thus compliance with City � regulations does not necessarily ensure compliance with federal or state laws. 10. (DCD-01) ASBESTOS: Prior to performing any renovation or demolition work, Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and Washington Department of Labor and Industries(L&I)regulations require an � asbestos survey be performed to determine whether there are asbestos-containing materials � in the work area or structure. The asbestos survey must be conducted by and EPA-certified (AHERA)building inspector(except renovation or owner-occupied single family residences).For more information, please contact Clean Air Agency through their web site at www.pscleanair.org or by phone at 800-552-3565 or 206-343-8800. The L&I web site can be � found at www.ini.wa.gov/TradesLicensing/LicensingReq/Asbestos/default.asp. I LEAD-BASED PAINT:A contractor or person receiving compensation who is performing ! � renovation, repairs or painting on a residential building or a child-occupied facility built before � ; 1978, must be trained and certified by an accredited training provider,and registered as a ' Renovator by the Washington State Department of Commerce-Lead-Based Paint Program. I For further information please contact:The Department of Commerce website at: I www.commerce.wa.gov/lead,or call: (360)586-LEAD(5323). i10. (DCD-02) DCD:Validity of permit.The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a _ _ _ _ _ permit for,or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of the Washington State ___ _� Page 1 oT 3 Print Parcel Search Map � Page ] of] Kitsap County Parcel Search Legend �- � Parcels Road Names ; ' � -- _. -- , - - - � . ; � 18TH ST i — - .._. --:.:� . - _ _ ','. � ' .. -; �---- � - ; `78d1�45i- � , � - ---- -------- �.: . _ ......:-..---i ' � I w i.____ . W _ . .. -1's�H ST -- � -- � i � -. _._......._... d. � � -_ --I� -i� ___- _ � i , . . ; , . . : .._-...;....: . � � W . __.. ,.., . � ; � _. .. . _... . , � ---- 2 . U � ' ...__i �7as-aa�-aa�-aao�'. ,v�'��'�_- Ca ri ht C�2011 Kitsa Count DISCLAIMER� This map is intended for display purposes only and is not intended for any legal representations. [Click here to Print] http://kcwppub3.co.kitsap.wa.us/ParcelSearch/PRINT.ASP?CMD=ZOOMOUT&APAN=&... 4/3/2012 � � r � . � . _� : o...f+�'Y'i�t:'". v-.+r�... .,G':;:b��#i�:>�...'u"Cr'7G��'s;� s*i-.;� ,r':t;i_�`.�`,'�'`y;•�i` �` ' • I.. �,�..'� S �jt •f3 Ki��3 w i`s i,i Cr:[;.p• •y;'�.fi•-;;;�.��;,Fy�:�;:i� - ,�.. ■+ ..,;'��',� �i =�� y" :;G.7.�"i�� "i��"�.: ...$�+"Cv•.�i. C�'�;ii.ii�.r.. v� .i'+ �-. �^��. 4 �.. '1 , �. i - ti- ��s > is�r�s,�.. s ;.,�. . �. .:: �..-... _. - _ �� • , ..__. -...,,, �. ,t .' ' v ..,,.� _ .'h^�i' ' ' �.�.1;i �� - . . . ' .' �..-s:• � ;!� ��.�..n._•.:::.`��•�'�"_'� _ — _ _ _ '_ _ -> _ _ - c'.".. ._.' ..... ,: ' - ..`. ,� , ' ,' ��. .: ..�.�: . -,-... ... �...:_. t' � .,. ��s.{ +�j-• f tr�� •,E.>. -F:��.; 11 1 �', ;,;- I��:.��+: ;i� l � F � r � F II� ��'�� .;: ij , -;. �.:�.�.; � i .`��'. 1`: ',•;._.`i I.' .';. � �• .}La. 1'�. � � ;k.; j� F � � f-;.;{ (' . ��:'`� �� ?��Y''. l.::::, j":::r�` �c,�:i f4:�..� �. . ��:s.��.E~ ''.•.i i. :i'' �;_i�'�.��. :f;. _�,�i�,;; i•';', I• lif: ��'" -;�,': �;.:.�; �.' r:� _ �:, f� S'?: '�J .i�YV': T �t�: ••��*s i;::;` �.i.. �•Si. [�. 1' ••1 � , [.i.. :��:1: ... �.!' "[r':.��.i F;t ::�:� }'..�''. �,..._::�..: �'y'�" ��- '.L:' .� r=._.�, :7�`r�' - _ , : r� ;r,,.�� !: _ � ' � � - �� ,l.:'i. ..._ ._..��.-._.'_'"�-' -' ' _' _. _ ' _ - ' ' _" ' ' " " " . ...:�..^.s_._...._..--,.-...._,..se.� - -�•-•---�.... � .� ...._trr. �'.i�-.i.::�:'c..•!'. ' . - ..�...,..�"i;.�:'� _ 'F�:�i,C±--,2.y�.�� 1 ' ��' ' rl1 ' -;C' - .=.:_3'�i:._.��• �i:...�; �, ... . ... .- . ,:.:.. '.:' '.;:'...,..:,y... --' , • ,..... _ � .„� . . ..... .."'_'' "_' ',_ ' ' '_ ' '" "" '_ ' __ '_ :� _ .. ...::.. c,... � _.... . .. ..._ . 'r' - 1. - - . - i i� '�';i�; � .,�r _ . -..,.i. .�, :. ' .,.:i ...._. , ..,'' ' `.,i:' :.' . ._. . . . . ': '� ... ...�.....�.:.•-.�'. 1.. ..... .-- .. _ . _ y , _ .....}� . ::• .1 ... . �..... .- •--'�� ,�•- .: • - - - '� - Y:•' ..F.�: . �.....>:;....... .. � ; '�.s �t;._. - - �1,-, +�;J - - If_. . :.. .. . . .. .... . , • :. �' , - '��l'C�1: - - :s- - _ . _ -- � — C.. - =r .,,-,.,;, . ...,t_, .:..., . : ... :.,-�...` . ., �:..--•-:.:; •t_:..... -:. _ _ - --'�e' -- - ii_ - - - - - ... -. . _ - -- - .... .__ .. .... _�:.............:.. .. ... . ...-. - - r:_ - - - - " - �,..:. .:;:.�.., . .. .,,., _ - - _ _.k' " ' .. �.i�....� . .".: _ _ ..:,_,. . ..i. _ . -'�' 'i:: .. � �'.:'.r.. ...., .-:-:...^i•'.W:=.�'..�. _ _ _ _ _ _ - ' �� City of Bremerton Department of Community Development :: 345 - 6th Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 . ;� • � Phone: (360) 473-5275 Fax: 360 473-5278 EXEMPTION REOUEST FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AS PER STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT Applicant: STITT GUY A 8� MARY ANN - 130818TH ST Bremerton WA 98312 Prepared by: Nicole Flo d Title: City Planner Signature: Date: June 12, 2012 The proposal by(applicant) B 2 00152 — Replace 80' bulkhead with rock bulkhead To undertake the following development: Repair and maintenance File # BB12 00152 Following property(please list legal description, i.e., section to the nearest quarter section): Section 14, Township 24, Range 1E Tax ID: 3708-001-001-0006 within (name of water azea) Port Washington Narrows and/or Its associated wetlands is exempt from the requirement of a substantial development permit because the development WAC 173-27-040(2)(b) Normal maintenance and repair. A SEPA DNS was issued using the optional process pursuant to WAC 197-11-355 on June 11, 2012 (Identify exemptions as outlined in WAC 173-27-040) DEPARTMENT REFERENCE TO BE COMPLETED BY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with: CHECK ONE Consistent Inconsistent � � Policies of the Shoreline Management Act � � The Bremerton Shoreline Management Master Program(BSMMP) � � (Date) (Signature of Authorized Dep ent of Community Development Representative) Nicole Floyd City Planner Name Title Assigned U.S.Corps of Engineer Public Notice Number. � Page l of 1 Nicole Floyd From: Nicole Floyd Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 12:05 PM To: 'Alison Osullivan'; 'Darren Habel'; 'Joe Burcar'; 'Keith Grellner'; 'Peg Plummer'; waldbcmw@dfw.wa.gov; 'Bruce McDonald'; 'Spencer Horning' Subject: Notice of application and SEPA Determination Attachments: Planting Plan.pdf; SEPA Checklist.pdf; Shoreline Application.pdf; Construction Details.pdf; Geotch Letter.pdf; Geotecti Report.pdf; JARPA.pdf; 2 NOA and SEPA determination.doc To Whom It May Concern: Attached you will find the SEPA notice for a bulkhead replacement at 1308 18�h Street. Please note that the comment deadline is June 7, 2012. Included in this email you will find the following: • Shoreline Checklist • SEPA Checklist • Notice of Application • Geotech Report • Project Plans • JARPA Application Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Hard copies of these materials are available upon request. Sincerely, N��or�r�� City of Bremerton Land Use Planner phone: (360)473-5279 fax: (360)473-5278 5/21/2012 ,►11'� '.'�t� 4 � �� ♦�.r� �� V� ��A. �""r� �4 . • .� �e_� Yt�c�Y�:n' , Y�� • '+5�. �� . t 1�F �. �. •� -� d t•' •� � •r. �, ��a� r''�. i ♦ 4 1 y. + -( � 1 t�\' c C t • + ,F 1'�� t 1 ��?�' ` ��. tiC ;�f yn T .,ry�.: ' ti�,.+C .�,�' ��. ^y ;�r ,L) . � 1 � r i- ZL ,�� 7 � Y �� 4l:� �``y . 1�r�; t�� F . :�f,�l.��.f :"3 •il,: � � . . .� � -- ' 7�,�.a�.'<4*?� i433, � ,r' � t ...i_ �! . 1 4 „�' r _� �� .,f. . . .. . ' 'C�! i � �-'1` r`'�.1 i� 1.�`� �� \ Y . _ . �„ � '*14 �} 'p-r� � .��.� � .}� . J4. { � i �i��'., i .� ,�r 'P d, �-t � iL lt ./,� + �t �.� �' � 4 a s. � ��-,Y �'�n,i�v!�T �`_��*'�� ,��!� �f��y '' ,y#/ '*f t��tr � - • 7t+k �� ,�`�--� i � �• � J -.� `� ,.3.:03,, ly` ,,� ,t 1 r f y •� ^'�.'' � � � x ' b iy! �. ` ,:�t i r ;: -,r, . �' =C' f> �� w. . . �� Y}�:� '� .V� . :� ��. �::j4L ; 'X�- sr�yl� •.t�ti - �� , v �! _ i' t4: "c�1:,�{ -;7�•' �. ��'�� T,Vaa�' \ ,.. � • �. �-� ��.•1 � !,� . .}r,� �. `� � 7� -�►,.'. � : ':� .. . �� 4 ��i� � � R '��' A�.l3 '' � [� y ,, � t.,1 : �, ;� � ` * , . � � �. .i �r ' '`' .l la�..'�t � ., t _ •.s 't t R�. ��. PI•'�� .✓. f-� .�., e i 5�4�M •.`J . � � ,a+� ..9, � �� "�p :1 �, i +� ,.,� �� f- �fi, �H '�' l�'; i r. - r. �� - �� ' �,� ��'4. :, y� '�k�� Si� h a'��°�,� • • /}; � , r ✓�y � , �k i �. 'x ps`` ' w 5. S ✓,. 4 . Y � v .' - � b �k e . ,.a �� ,r - 4 ;��• f.m N ; �w,+. 7'+ r . � '� ' 'M.. - , - i x:_ ��c 4 - Y� . -�� -;� J t=' � ' � ;f, r 1'�� i� c,,y�n _.�1". � �- .,y w r i i „E 3r �_- y:.� �y . ,�•t. �;r . �• , � �{��s l -�t' +�` ��y,� .y •'r�1 ti� t 1 y Tt; • 4 i� Y'r5.Y�i,- � ' ;" V ' .d �`'�4� �..Yt�"�� 3 .`FKj ��,i'� ` . T�y��Srd . ��t.n� l . 'f' � �;� �,, ;{ ,:3� . �� 4r� L.'?b^�.�" ��Fj�s?i .t�4 � tah , • �,��i.��' ` a - � f i .- f , ` - J . 'y1�{�' .�vyy� .r„r s la� ' i R`�r `y `!-J' ! ry�Ix. � ir^� t"�1 A�f +'��' � } ' ,�•�y { � . . ♦ ..Y. �y r i,''r4+"� ��`�;1�' F . �� '� y.y� r�� '* .4` 1.y ' -+ ,�1�. r�� 'I...� �I'.' 1 . • ' ti � . � y�,�. �� ni : y •y s � � t��/�.� 4l�; - L. �i - . ti' y J31�` 1"`dr 3' � �1. J : f� �*t'_f7 2+S! •F�` , ,`�. fii'��,�.� ~ ��• ,� . '`, .r . ' ' . � .T7� -�'�Er�y" ,i. !`l S r �_� � t ��. — Y�^ �rtj � SC�� ,� ' y' '�.. -i� t . . �•z J� ! .� =� '��;r s ,� ,4 ;,�,�. B . . t`�r'. � " ' � � *'��- r' t�, 't , _ , � `.Fff'• . ,' ` ,4 't '� ' �i ,. �. ` � � , . Z_ - , T'. 1 � �sl•�i �: �r.'� . o. S. r. �. . � ��F ,_:� ;4 . ,h r i�f ��' . " . �i".- �;a;. '.� -t r �i- -*..� . . ) y' ._��• � � - . ..c. �. - - '.� . . }! . ..�+ � . 1 . ...`:f v � r,f+Y . J � � ... .�•• �/` . .. �"1 . �' ..,J.+� . . ' � , ' _ - � ' � '`��,r. � . . • . , . =r. .[s �� 1 � � ^ _��: '��..�• 't�y; . . . ',. ',�. r�A � I I % r� �. �117E {��f�}l�/ . =- --I�oRTr l�i�s H-1 NG i o xl N�4R Rd ws �-Z-� ri�vv ��exk (3v�.kN� ��rsiNG�ock � �ZG'P�9c►u�c0/�cR� 4` eo�Hyc/r2qrt ' �� `.l�2 f �?e+c� Rcx,�FF�Ar� A �V�II��I� J � � 1 1 ��r' � GRpvE�S � � `� Z' �iEA�H- Z— _, � _ F�eo�_� �� — �Et3B � � �.`-�.`_ �gar S�R��/-�.� �--�. �...� � I �E(6' � � f�5.�-- *3� .� �4l' p�f}tl1� so' � � �s,� u, D1�NC�5 -� p,. A�-, �"�3 � %� F,� F w.�s:�� =�` Haus� s � ��° r'��. � � �� ..: • ,� O � � �� 2 -� • , � �" , ; ` 1 �$o�� :� � � . sru�va,�.�'`'�''� !�, .- �3 _ cr � ; Ptt��9ew�d � , � � � I o� Co1�C rE o c � �1�.�1I' oc' L��.k��. -� (k.�- e -�_ �' ��' SCALE: / �I� �O1 DRAWN BY DRAWINC I IUMBER ■ � _ DATE: �� REV ISED / • <' ��' - � � , AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Account#37922 AD#283424 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KITSAP I,Christine Kendrick,being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says: That she is now,and at all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned was the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of KITSAP SLJN;that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County of Kitsap,in which County it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to,published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Bremerton,Kitsap County,Washington,a weekly newspaper in Kitsap County, Washington and is now and during all of said time,was printed in an office maintained in the aforesaid place of publication of said newspzper; that the following is a true text of an advertisement as it was published in regular issues(and not in supplement form)of said newspaper on the following date,to wit: And on May 24,2012 such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of$86.72.This amount has not been paid in full. � � (Signature of Principal Clerk) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of May 25,2012. CASSANDRA A CAPAS Notary Public Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,Kitsap County. � F� ,Stc�fe of Washi,ngton ., , MY Commisslon Expires " February 04, 2014 CITY OF BREMERTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT(DCD) NOTICE OF APPLICATION&SEPA DETERMINATION PROPOSAL: Replacement of approx. 80'concret bulkhead with rock bulkhead at 1308 18th Street. (BP 12 00152) OTHER PERMITS: Buiding permit&JARPA DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS: JL1NE 7,2012 by 5:00 P.M. The City of Bremerton has received application for the proposal described above. Consistent with the provisions of Bremerton Municipal Code and the Shoreline Master Program a thirty(14)day comment period will be utilized to obtain comments on the Notice of Application. , � r� A Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS)is expected to be issued through the optional DNS process, . pursuant to WAC 197-11-355,is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. Based on any substantive comments received,the proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes,and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Any person may submit written comments on the applcation by the time and date above. Any person may also request to receive a copy o;the decision once made,and any appeal rights. Please direct any questions,comments or reGuests for additional information to Nicole Floyd,City Planner, 345 6th Street,Suite 600,Bremerton,WA 98337;phone(360)473-5279. May 24,2012 AD#20125452 1 2 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 3 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. 5 COUNTY OF KITSAP ) 6 COMES NOW, Nicole Floyd, who, being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says: 7 g 1. I am an employee in the Department of Community Development for the City of Bremerton. 9 2. On the '� day of , 20 !Z , I mailed a copy of the attached NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND SEPA DE RMINATION, File No. BP12-00152 to the attached ' 10 individuals via e-mail or regular mail, postage prepaid, deposited in the United States mail in Bremerton, Washington, on the date above-indicated. 11 12 l3 14 15 L�cJ c,.x Print Name: NICOLE FL D 16 17 � SIGNED AND SWORN to before me this .vf ' day of � , 20�Zt5y NICOLE FLOYD i8 . �� n � ^��i �9 `�\ O�r��`��/� :yr•.'�' ,. � �t°};�� Notary ublic ' and for the tate of Washington, 20 �• — � = s Notary ; ' residing at , 2� � N; PUbIIC ? � ; My appointment expires: ' � ► i��`''a:!1;?�:g'� 4��0� / � ♦ 2� �/��0 i Wa,r`�� 2� AFFIDAVIT OF MA[LING - 1 24 25 1 ' AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING 3 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. 5 COUNTY OF KITSAP ) • 6 COMES NOW, Nicole Ward, who, being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says: 7 1. I am an employee in the Department of Community Development for the City of g Bremerton. 9 2. On the�day of � , 20 /2 , I posted the attached NOTICE OF l0 APPLICATION AND SEPA DETERMINATION, File Number BP12 00152 on the property at: 11 1308 18th Street �2 Bremerton, WA (3 l4 l5 Print Name: Nicole oyd 16 SIGNED AND SWORN to before me this �day of , 20�2by Nicole �� Floyd. , I 8 `��►�I��i��i �� nn�� C��ii I 9 ��c�r�� '�°A� � �' �to�'':%' % � �' �.m;� ; Notary Public i and for the S te of Washington, � ` { Nofary �' = residing at (��-� ' �. LO p�� = . Publio � My appointment expires: • 1. 2 l %,�4f'�o�••'ti»�p�e•,•�+�`:� '2 ',i°,,,Wa'r,,`.`. 23 AFFIDAVIT OF POST[NG- l 24 25 DEPARTMENT OF COi�I��IUN11'V'DEVELOPA•IEN"1' NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND SEPA DETERMINATION :� ��• PROPOSAL: Replacement of approx. 80' concret bulkhead with rock bulkhead. LOCATION: 1308 18`h Street APPLICANT: Guy Stitt FILE NUMBER: BP 12 00152 EXISTING ENVIRO. DOCUMENTS: Environmental Checklist, Geotechnical Report, & JARPA OTHER PERMITS: Building Permit &JARPA (Fish & Wildlife) DATE OF APPLICATION: Apri13, 2012 � DATE OF NOTICE OF COMPLETENESS: May 21, 2012 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: May 24, 2012 DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS: JUNE 7, 2012 bv 5:00 P.M. The City of Bremerton has received application for the proposal described above. Consistent with the provisions of Bremerton Municipal Code and the Shoreline Master Program a thirty(14)day comment period will be utilized to obtain comments on the Notice of Application. A Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS) is expected to be issued and the optional DNS process,pursuant to WAC 197- 11-35�, is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. Based on any substantive comments received, the proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an E[S is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Any person may submit written comments on the applciaiton by the time and date above. Any person may also request to receive a copy of the decision once made,and any appeal rights. Please direct any questions, comments or requests for additional information to the Department of Community Development, 345 Sixth Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337-1873; or phone Nicole Floyd,Current Planner at(360) 473-5279. Distribution: Dcpartment of Fish and Wildlife Department of Natural Resources Suquamish Tribe Department of Ecology Army Corp of Engineers Navy Health Department Applicant � �:� ' � _ .. _ �.�.�_ � ; •°- —'--- ''< Department of Community Development � �i��;j�. ; 345 6th Street, Suite 600 : . �� : ; �= • �� ;� ;. .'� Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 '~ --� Telephone: 360-473-5289 . . . . _ _ __. --- -- _. - - - --. . --- ---- Fax: 360-473-5278 Nicole.Floyd@ci.bremerton.wa.us Nicole Floyd, Planner May 21, 2012 Notice of Complete Application — 1308 18�h Street, File #BB12 00152 Guy & Mary Ann Stitt 1308 18�h Street Bremerton WA 98337 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Stitt, The Department of Community Development has received your Shoreline Exemption application and SEPA application for a bulkhead repair at 1308 18th Street. The City has deemed this application complete and ready for processing. The application was routed to City departments for review and comment pursuant to City regulations. Enclosed is the Notice of Application, which begins the 14-day public comment period. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360) 473-5279, or email at Nicole.Floyd@ci.bremerton.wa.us. Sincerely, � Nicole Floyd City Planner Distribution: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders P.O. BOX 375 Kingston, WA 98346 sealevelbbCa�silverlink.net 1 ;j-=-�-=_--_ :�', ..�, :.�T=.'.:_�.-_:=::1---� ii'_ - `::r`;•`. r:. �"`:��.�.•�•�.�,� - � �.:; :;�^:`;`- '_;,-...::".V;';:�.;..:'z:s_z'r'=;.:: r i ° -i''» t4;' � �;�=`"` 'E� •-`.'� ��`<-°� ---�;�=��:r`� •:� ;' Department of Community Development .�la`=ii^��z.!;!�-`-y�'1?ta�'.ti_+r �'r=,�r//�.;�"i�; � _i 1 i �'''� '---�+�:��r . ,4;�r.��-G,�f�,t.`{h;�?�� ___�� _ 'i 345 6fh Street, Suite 600 i �_-- ��: - '• �:�c'=� u: � � �:f�:= =:��^-`�= �=�:=_�`��--.�'•��'�� Bremerton WA 98337-1873 j -•''-'°' ��;':?.:: _ ._ _�_._°::,;,�i;� �f�:;r;t�� •;,� , �� —�.� �.;6.'�;::--==j�-.-.:_.`,,::=_=�__ ==-->�L."�'��;�'"c i I' �_=�=�-_�`�=�='--=�==;=�=:� ��.--�-F.�-==-�'! Telephone: 360-473-5289 i�'_�_;�:_�'��?=`��_�_��:�-�---, r... �.::;-.:.:.�. _.. _ . ... ... ......:. :.� _...-------------------------�---�--- � .:� Fax: 360-473-5278 Nicole.Floyd@ci.bremerton.wa.us Nicole Floyd, Pianner April 29, 2012 Notice of Incomplete Application — 1308 18th Street, File#B612 00152 Guy & Mary Ann Stitt 1308 18th Street Bremerton WA 98337 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Stitt, The Department of Community Development has received your Shoreline Exemption, and SEPA application to replace an exiting concrete bulkhead with a rock bulkhead. Prior to processing of this application a planting plan for the buffer is needed. As this proposal is for the full replacement of the bulkhead it appears to exceed the threshold for exemptions from planting requirements (BMC 20.54). Pursuant to BMC 20.14.730(d)(1) enhanced vegetation is required in the buffer (which is the 35' from OHWM or bulkhead landward). Plantings are to include native shrubs on 3' centers, and trees on 8' centers. Alternately, the applicant can provide a Habitat Management Plan that establishes an alternate planting plan; provided it is demonstrated that the reduced buffer and/or alternate plantings will provide better habitat protections than would be achieved through the standard code requirements. Until the above mentioned items are received the City will place your application on hold. Once all necessary information has been submitted the City will continue processing the permit and route it to the applicable agencies for comment. Pursuant to BMC 20.02.090(c) necessary documentation and supplemental information must be submitted within 90 days. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (360)473-5279, or email at Nicole.Floyd@ci.bremerton.wa.us. Sincerely, Nicole Floyd City Planner Distribution: Sealevel Bulkhead Builders sealevelbb(a�silverlink.net 1 Nicole Floyd From: Jordan, Jess NWS [Dale.J.Jordan@usace.army.milJ Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 7:05 AM To: Nicole Floyd Subject: RE: Notice of application and SEPA Determination (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE This work will require a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. Conducting the work without a permit will result in a knowing an willful violation of section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Thank you, Jess Jordan Biologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District-Regulatory Branch 4735 E. Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA, 98124 206-439-4536 Dale.J.JordanC�usace.army.mil -----Original Message----- From: Habel, Darren NWS _ Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 8:43 PM To: Jordan, Jess NWS Subject: FW: Notice of application and SEPA Determination (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE -----Original Message----- From: Nicole Floyd [mailto:Nicole.Floyd@ci.bremerton.wa.us] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 12 :05 PM To: Alison Osullivan; Habel, Darren NWS; Joe Burcar; Keith Grellner; Peg Plummer; waldbcmw@dfw.wa.gov; Bruce McDonald; Spencer Horning Subject: Notice of application and SEPA Determination To Whom It May Concern: Attached you will find the SEPA notice for a bulkhead replacement at 1308 18th Street. Please note that the comment deadline is June 7, 2012 . Included in this email you will find the following: * Shoreline Checklist * SEPA Checklist * Notice of Application * Geotech Report 1 �.R * Project Plans * JARPA Application Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Hard copies of these materials are available upon request. Sincerely, Nicole Floyd City of Bremerton Land Use Planner phone: (360) 473-5279 fax: (360) 473-5278 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE 2 ' -• -------------------------------; . , � AGENCY USE ONLY , 2010 ' ' _ "�" ' ' ; Date received: � � ' ""YU WASHINGTON STATE s��^9��g ; ; � Agency reference#: � Joint Aquatic Resources Permit , , Appiication (JARPA) Form' � TaxParcel#(s): ; , , USE BLACK OR BLUE INK TO ENTER ANSWERS IN WHITE SPACES BEL�1�'iC�"'IVEI� � � City of Bremertoa � ' � '-------------------------------------' � APR � 3 2012 Part 1—Project Identification �. PI'OjeCt NBme (A name for your project that you create. Ex�an��l�tor Seabrook Lane Development) hel Z Stitt Bulkhead Replacement Part 2—Applicant The person or organization responsible for the project. nei Za. Name (�ast, First,Middle)and Organizati0n(if applicable) Stitt, Guy 2b. Mailing Address (street or Po Box) 1308 18�' Street 2c. City, State, Zip Bremerton, WA. 98337 2d. Phone(�� 2e. Phone(2) 2f. Fax 2 . E-mail (360) 792-1542 ( ) ( ) rstark@paladindata.com Part 3—Authorized Agent or Contact Person authorized to represent the applicant about the project. (Note: Authorized agent(s) must sign 11 b. of this application.) nei 3a. Name (Last, First, Middle) and Organization (if appiicable) Sealevel Bulkhead Builders, Inc. 3b. Mailing Address (street or Po Box) P.O. Box 375 �Additional forms may be required for the following permits: • If your project may qualify for Department of the Army authoriaation through a Regional General Permit(RGP),contact the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for application information(206)764-3495. • If your projed might affect species listed under the Endangered Species Ad,you will need to fill out a Specfic Project Information Form(SPIF)or prepare a Biological Evaluation. Forms can be found at http.//www.nws.usace.army.md/PublicMenu/Menu.cfm?sitename=REG&pagename=mainpage_ESA . If you are applying for an Aquatic Resources Use Authorization you will need to fill out and submit an Application for Authorization to Use State- Owned Aquatic Lands form to DNR,which can be found at http.//www.dnr.wa gov/Publications/aqr_use_auth_app.doc • Not all cities and counties accept the JARPA for their local Shoreline permits.If you think you will need a Shoreline pertnit,contad the appropriate city or county government to make sure they will accept the JARPA. ZTo access an online JARPA form with(help]screens,go to http://www epermitting wa.gov/sitelalias resourcecenter/jarpaJarpa_form/9984ljarpa_form.aspx. For other help,contad the Govemor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at 1-800-917-0043 or help@ora.wa gov. JARPA 2010 v1 3f30/2010 Page 1 of 12 3c. City, State, Zip KingSton, WA. 98346 3d. Phone(�� 3e. Phone(2) 3f. Fax 3 . E-mail (360) 297-2401 ( ) (360) 297-2308 jenny@sealevelbb.com Part 4�Property Owner(s) Contact information for people or organizations owning the property(ies) where the project will occur. nei � Same as applicant. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ Repair or maintenance activities on existing rights-of-way or easements. (Skip to Part 5.) ❑ There are multiple property owners. Complete the section below and fill out JARPA Attachment A for each additional property owner. 4a. Name (�ast,First, Middle)and Organization (if applicable) 4b. Mailing Address (Street or PO Box) 4c. City, State, Zip 4d. Phone(�� 4e. Phone(2) 4f. Fax 4 . E-mail � ) � ) Part 5—Project Location(s) Identifying information about the property or properties where the project will occur. nei ❑ There are multiple project locations (e.g., linear projects). Complete the section below and use JARPA Attachment B for each additional project location. 5a. Indicate the type of ownership of the property. (Cneck au tnat appiy.� hel ❑ State Owned Aquatic Land (if yes or maybe,contact the Department of Natural Resources(DNR)at(360)902-1100) ❑ Federal ❑ Other publicly owned (state,county,city, special districts like schools,ports,etc.) ❑ Tribal � Private 5b. StP62t Addl'eSS (Cannot be a PO Box. If there is no address, provide other location information in 5p.) hel 1308 18th Street 5C. Clty, State, Zlp(If the project is not in a city or town, provide the name of the nearest city or town.) h�elp] Bremerton, WA. 98337 5d. County hel ' Kitsap JARPA 2010 v1 3I30/2010 Page 2 of 12 5e. Provide the section, township, and range for the project location. nei '/4 Section Section Township Range NE 14 24N 1 E 5f. Provide the latitude and longitude of the project location. nei • Example:47.03922 N lat./-122.89142 W long. (NAD 83) 47° 34'40.52" N/ 122°38'13.92" W 5g. List the tax parcel number(s) for the project location. nei • The local county assessors office can provide this information. 3708-001-001-0006 5h. Contact information for all adjoining property owners. (�f you need more space, use JARPA Attachment C.) hel Name Mailing Address Tax Parcel #(if known) Pamula Sparks 1800 Ohio Ave 3708-001-003-0004 Bremerton, WA 98337 Olympic College 3804-006-001-1006 Breme�ton, WA. 98337 5i. List all wetlands on or adjacent to the project location. n�] None 5j. List all waterbodies (other than wetlands) on or adjacent to the project location. nei Port Washington Narrows 5k. Is any part of the project area within a 100-year flood plain? hel ❑ Yes ❑ No � Don't know 51. Briefly describe the vegetation and habitat conditions on the property. n�] Grass and Landscaping between the home and the OHW JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 3 of 12 �m. uescnoe now tne propeRy is curreniiy usea. nl eip� Single Family Residence 5n. Describe how the adjacent properties are currently used. hei Single Family Residence 50. Describe the structures (above and below ground) on the property, including their purpose(s). nei Owner's home, existing concrete bulkhead. 5p. Provide driving directions from the closest highway to the project location, and attach a map. nei Traveling south on WA-3 take the Kitsap Way exit, turning left on 6�' street/WA-310. Follow and turn left at 11�' Street, then left onto High Street, then right onto 17th Street. From 17�'tum left at Ohio Ave and right onto 1gth Street. End at site. � Part 6—Project Description 6a. Summarize the overall project. You can provide more detail in 6d. n[ ep] The project consists of removing the concrete bulkhead and replacing it with a granite bulkhead. The rock bulkhead will be constructed with 5-6 man (weighing 4,000-8,000 Ibs) rocks for the base with 2-4 man (weighing 1,500-4,000 Ibs) stacked on top of them. The base rocks will be keyed in +/-3' below beach grade with the remaining rocks stacked on top for a total above beach grade height of+/-5'. Quarry spalls will be placed behind the armor rock and filter fabric befinreen the spalls and the bank. The bulkhead will be installed no further waterward than the existing bulkhead. All materials and equipment will be delivered to the site by barge. 6b. Indicate the project category. (check au tnat appiy� hel ❑ Commercial � Residential ❑ Institutional ❑ Transportation ❑ Recreational ❑ Maintenance ❑ Environmental Enhancement 6c. Indicate the major elements of your project. �cneck au cnat appiy� �neip� ❑ Aquaculture ❑ Culvert ❑ Float ❑ Road ❑ Bank Stabilization ❑ Dam /Weir ❑ Geotechnical Survey ❑ Scientific ❑ Boat House ❑ Dike/ Levee/Jetty ❑ Land Clearing Measurement Device JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 4 of 12 ❑ Boat Launch ❑ Ditch ❑ Marina / Moorage ❑ Stairs ❑ Boat Lift ❑ Dock/ Pier ❑ Mining ❑ Stormwater facility ❑ Bridge ❑ Dredging ❑ Outfall Structure ❑ Swimming Pool � Bulkhead ❑ Fence ❑ Piling ❑ Uti�ity Line ❑ Buoy ❑ Ferry Terminal ❑ Retaining Wall ❑ Channel Modification ❑ Fishway (upland) ❑ Other: 6d. Describe how you plan to construct each project element checked in 6c. Include specific construction methods and equipment to be used. nei �. Identify where each element will occur in relation to the nearest waterbody. • Indicate which activities are within the 100-year flood plain. All material and equipment will be brought in by barge and grounded on the beach and used as needed to construct the bulkhead. Equipment and materials will stay within allowed work corridors. All none native material onsite will be removed. 6e. What are the start and end dates for project construction? (month�year) h[ elp] • If the project will be constructed in phases or stages,use JARPA Attachment D to list the start and end dates of each phase or stage. Start date: As soon as possible_ End date: _7-10 days after start date_ ❑ See JARPA Attachment D 6f. Describe the purpose of the project and why you want or need to perForm it. nei The existing concrete bulkhead is in need of being replaced to continue to protect the single family residence. Please see attached geo-technical report completed by Coastal Solutions for more details. 6g. Fair market value of the project, including materials, labor, machine rentals, etc. hei $46,000 6h. Will any portion of the project receive federal funding? hel • If yes, list each agency providing funds. ❑ Yes � No ❑ Don't know JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 5 of 12 Part 7—Wetlands: Impacts and Mitigation � ❑ Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) n�] la. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. nf elpl ❑ Not applicable 7b. Wil�the project impact wetlands? n[ e� ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7c. Will the project impact wetland buffers? hel ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? hel • If yes, submit the report, including data sheets,with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating System? hel • If yes, submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't know 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? hel • If yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. nei 7h. Use the table below to list the type and rating of each wetland impacted; the extent and duration of the impact; and the type and amount of mitigation proposed. Or if you are submitting a mitigation plan with a similar table, you can state (below) where we can find this information in the plan. nei JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 6 of 12 Activity (fill, Wetland Wetland Impact Duration Proposed Wetland drain, excavate, Name' type and area (sq. of impact' mitigation mitigation area flood, etc.) rating ft. or type4 (sq. ft. or category2 Acres) acres) If no official name for the wetland exists,create a unique name(such as'1Netland 1"). The name should be consistent with other project documents,such as a wetland delineation report. Z Ecology wetland category based on current Westem Washington or Eastem Washington Wetland Rating System.Provide the wetland rating forms with the JARPA package. 'Indicate the days,months or years the wetland will be measurably impacted by the adivity.Enter"permanent"if applicable. °Creation(C),Re-establishmenURehabilitation(R),Enhancement(E),Preservation(P),Mitigation Bank/In-lieu fee(B) Page numbe�(s) for similar information in the mitigation plan, if available: 7i. For all filling activities identified in 7h., describe the source and nature of the fill material, the amount in cubic ards that will be used, and how and where it will be laced into the wetland. nei 7j. For all excavating activities identified in 7h., describe the excavation method, type and amount of material in cubic yards you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. nei Part 8—Waterbodies (other than wetlands): Impacts and Mitigation In Part 8, "waterbodies" refers to non-wetland waterbodies. (See Part 7 for information related to wetlands.) nei � Check here if there are waterbodies on or adjacent to the project area. (If there are none, skip to Part 9.) 8a. Describe how the project is designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to the aquatic environment. hel ❑ Not applicable The project will result in no net loss of habitat. JARPA 2010 v1 3/3012010 Page 7 of 12 I 8b. Will your project impact a waterbody or the area around a waterbody? nei � Yes ❑ No 8c. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for the project's adverse impacts to non-wetland waterbodies? hel • If yes, submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 8d. • If No,or Not applicable,explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. ❑ Yes � No ❑ Not applicable None at this time. To be discussed with Fish and Wildlife. 8d. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish. Describe how a watershed approach was used to design the plan. • If you already completed 7g.,you do not need to restate your answer here. hel N/A 8e. Summarize impact(s) to each waterbody in the table below. nei Activity (clear, Waterbody Impact Duration of Amount of material Area (sq. ft. or dredge, fill, pile name' Iocation2 impact3 to be placed in or linear ft.) of drive, etc.) removed from waterbody waterbod directl affected � Remove- Port In Permanent +/-75 yards +/-80 feet Concrete Washington bulkhead Narrows Dredge-remove Port Adjacent Permanent +/-50 yards +/-80 feet material for Washington footin Narrows Fill-Bulkhead Port Adjacent Permanent +/-140 yards +/-80 feet rock Washington Narrows If no official name for the waterbody exists,create a unique name(such as"Stream 1")The name should be consistent with other documents provided. Z Indicate whether the impact will occur in or adjacent to the waterbody. If adjacent,provide the distance between the impact and the waterbody and indicate whether the impact will occur within the 100-year flood plain. 'Indicate the da s,months or ears the waterbod will be measurabl im acted b the work. Enter" ermanent"if a licable. 8f. For all activities identified in 8e., describe the source and nature of the fill material, amount (in cubic yards) you will use, and how and where it will be placed into the waterbody. nei JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 8 of 12 The bulkhead will be constructed with appropriate sized rock and quarry spalls as described above. The existing concrete bulkhead will be removed from the beach, which will total +/-75 yards of material. The footing of the new bulkhead will require the removal of+/-50 yards of beach material to place the buried base rocks. If suitable, this material will be placed on the beach for nourishment. The armor rock for the bulkhead will total +/- 140 yards. All rock materials will be gathered from a local quarry. 8g. For all excavating or dredging activities identified-in 8e., describe the method for excavating or dredging, type and amount of material you will remove, and where the material will be disposed. n� An excavator will be on site to complete the above described removal, digging and placement of the rock. See above for further description. Part 9-Additional Information Any additional information you can provide helps the reviewer(s) understand your project. Complete as much of this section as you can. It is ok if you cannot answer a question. 9a. If you have already worked with any government agencies on this project, list them below. nei Agency Name Contact Name - Phone Most Recent Date of Contact ( ) � ) 9b. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies identified in Part 7 or Part 8 on the Washington Department of Ecology's 303(d) List? n� � If yes,list the parameter(s) below. • If you don't know, use Washington Department of Ecology's Water Quality Assessment tools at: http://www.ecv.wa.gov/proqrams/wQ/303d/. ❑ Yes � No 9c. What U.S. Geological Survey Hydrological Unit Code (HUC) is the project in? hel • Go to http://cfpub.epa.qovlsurf/locate/index.cfm to help identify the HUC. 17110019 9d. What Water Resource Inventory Area Number (WRIA#) is the project in? n[ eIa] • Go to http://www.ecy.wa.qov/services/qis/maps/wria/wria.htm to find the WRIA#. JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 9 of 12 15 9e. Will the in-water construction work comply with the State of Washington water quality standards for turbidity? hel • Go to http://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/wq/swqs/criteria.html for the standards. � Yes ❑ No ❑ Not applicable 9f. If the project is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act, what is the local shoreline environment designation? n(� • If you don't know,contact the local planning department. • For more information,go to: http://vuww.ecv.wa.gov/programs/sea/smallaws rules/173-26/211 designations.html. ❑ Rural � Urban ❑ Natural ❑ Aquatic ❑ Conservancy ❑ Other Semi-Rural 9g. What is the Washington Department of Naturai Resources Water Type? n[ e�] • Go to http://www.dnr.wa.qov/BusinessPermitslTopics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp watertvpinq.aspx for the Forest Practices Water Typing System. � Shoreline ❑ Fish ❑ Non-Fish Perennial ❑ Non-Fish Seasonal 9h. Will this project 6e designed to meet the Washington Department of Ecology's most current stormwater manual? h� • If no, provide the name of the manual your project is designed to meet. � Yes ❑ No Name of manual: 9i. If you know what the property was used for in the past, describe below: nei Unknown 9j. Has a cultural resource (archaeological) survey been perFo�med on the project area? hel • If yes, attach it to your JARPA package. ❑ Yes � No 9k. Name each species listed under the federal Endangered Species Act that occurs in the vicinity of the project area or might be affected by the proposed work. nei Salmon, Bald Eagles, Orca 91. Name each species or habitat on the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's Priority Habitats and Species List that might be affected by the proposed work. hei Unknown JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 10 of 12 � Part 10—SEPA Compliance and Permits Use the resources and checklist below to identify the permits you are applying for. • Online Project Questionnaire at http://apps.ecv.wa.aov/oqas/. • Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance at (800) 917-0043 or helq _ora.wa.qov. • For a list of agency addresses to send your application, click on the "where to send your completed JARPA" at http://www.epermitting.wa.gov. 10a. Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). (cneck au tnat appiy.� n� • For more information about SEPA,go to www.ecv.wa.Qov/proqrams/sea/seQa/e-review.html. ❑ A copy of the SEPA determination or letter of exemption is included with this application. � A SEPA determination is pending with City of Bremerton (lead agency). The expected decision date is Unknown ❑ I am applying for a Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption. (Cneck tne box beiow in �ob.) net ❑ This projeCt is exempt (choose type of exemption below). ❑ Categorical Exemption. Under what section of the SEPA administrative code (WAC) is it exempt? ❑ Other: ❑ SEPA is pre-empted by federal law. 10b. Indicate the permits you are applying for. (cneck au tnat appiy.) hel LOCAL GOVERNMENT Local Government Shoreline permits: ❑ Substantial Development ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Variance � Shoreline Exemption Type (explain): Other city/county permits: ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Critical Areas Ordinance STATE GOVERNMENT Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: � Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) ❑ Fish Habitat Enhancement Exemption Washington Department of Ecology: ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Washington Department of Natural Resources: ❑ Aquatic Resources Use Authorization � FEDERAL GOVERNMENT United States Department of the Army permits (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): ❑ Section 404 (discharges into waters of the U.S.) ❑ Section 10 (work in navigable waters) United States Coast Guard permits: ❑ General Bridge Act Permit ❑ Private Aids to Navigation (for non-bridge projects) JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 11 of 12 , Par# 11—Authorizing Signatures Signatures are required before submitting the JARPA package. The JARPA package includes the JARPA form, project plans, photos, 2tC. hel 11 a. Applicant Signature (required) hel I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities, and I agree to start work only after I have received all necessary permits. I hereby authoriz h agent named in Part 3 of this application to act on my behalf in matters related to this application. � (initiai) By initialing� e, state that I have the authority to grant access to the property. I also give my consent to the permitting agencies enteri property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work related to the project. (initiaq L.7 �/i �• � �,� l� � /l ✓o�, Applican Printed Name " p ca ignatu Date 1'i b. Authorized Agent Signature nei I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information provided in this application is true, complete, and accurate. I also certify that I have the authority to carry out the proposed activities and I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been issued. �r.�.i�2��.r, C�ir��.�—�,�,.- �–f t�l�z Authorized Agent Printed Name Aut ' ed Agent Signature Date 11 c. Property Owner Signature (if not applicant). nei Not required if project is on Existing rights-of-way or easements. I consent to the permitting agencies entering the property where the project is located to inspect the project site or any work. These inspections shall occur at reasonable times and, if practical, with prior notice to the landowner. Property Owner Printed Name Property Owner Signature Date 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that:Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. If you require this document in another format,contact The Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance(ORA). People with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. People with a speech disability can call (877)833-6341. ORA publication number: ENV-019-09 JARPA 2010 v1 3/30/2010 Page 12 of 12 City of Bremerton Department of Community Development DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE PROPOSAL: Replacement of approx. 80' concrete bulkhead with rock bulkhead. APPLICANT: City of Bremerton � LEAD AGENCY: Department of Community Development FILE NUMBER: BP12 00152 LOCATION: 1308 18th Street The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued after using the option DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Andrea L. Spencer Department of Community Development City of Bremerton 345 6'h Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337 STAFF CONTACT: Nicole Floyd, (360) 473-5279 DAT I F ISSUE: June 11, 2012 n rea L cer, Responsible Official N T . Pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.075, City of Bremerton SEPA requirements 20.04.210 and C of Bremerton environmental requirements BMC 20.14, decisions of the Responsible Official may be appealed. Appeals must be filed with the appropriate fees at the Department of Community Development located at the Bremerton Government Center, 345 Sixth Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337. NOTE: The issuance of this DNS does not constitute project approval. The applicant must comply with all other applicable requirements of the City of Bremerton and the State of Washington. - City of Bremertoa Department of Community Developrnent ��g 345 -6th Street, Suite 600 E�tyofBremerto� Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 �' '�• �pR � � 201� Phone: (360) 473-5275 Faz: 360 473-5278 Community Develo�menc ENVIRONIv1ENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose ofchecklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmenta.l agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is reyuired. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information lmown, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you rea.11y do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not la7ow"or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for rronproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). �� For nonproject�actions, the references in the checklist to the words ��project," "applicant," and "property or s�te should be read as proposal, proposer, and affected geographic area, respectively. � A) BACKGROUND 1 Name of proposed project,if applicable: Stitt Replacement Bulkhead 2 Name of applicant:Guy Stitt TO f'sE CQ��PLF"fED F3Y API'LICA��'I' EVALU:1�'ION I�OR ;GEhC1'USL-ONLI' 3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Guy Stitt, 1308 18'� St Bremerton, WA 98337 (360) 792-1542 Contact: Sealevel Bullchead Builders, Inc. PO Box 375, Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2401 jenny@sealevelbb.com 4 Date checklist prepared: Feb. 9'�',2012 5 Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF BREMERTON 6 Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): To begin as soon as possible and completed all at once. 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. No 8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Geo-technical report, dated Nov.21,20]1,by Coastal Solutions,LLC 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.No 10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal; if known. 11 Give brief, complete description of your proposal, inclvding the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The project consists of removing the concrete bulkhead and replacing it with a granite bulkhead. The rock bulkhead will be constructed with 5-6 man (weighing 4,000-8,000 Jbs) rocks for the base with 2-4 man (weighing 1,500-4,000 ibs) stacked on top of them. The base rocks will be keyed in +/-3' below beach grade with the remaining rocks stacked on top for a total above beach grade height of+/- 5'. Quarry spalls will be placed behind the armor rock and filter fabric between the spalls and the bank. The bulkhead will be installed no further waterward than the existing bulkhead. All materials and equipment will be delivered to the site by barge. 12 Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any, and section,township,and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or deta.iled plans submitted with any permit applications related to 2 't'U 13L CO?�11'LL"i'C:C DY AI'Yl_IC:AM L''�%iyI.UAT]UN Fi.)Z r"�GENCY IiSE O\�I_Y this checklist. Address: 1308 18'�St.Bremerton, WA Section: 14 Township: 24N Range: lE 1/4 Section:NE Legai Description: 3708-OO1-001-0006: BAY DRNE PARCEL 2 OF BOUNDARY LINE ADNSTIV�NT RECORDED LJNDER AUDTTOR'S FTLE NO.20041101023],RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY,WASHINGTON,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:LOTS l AND 2, BLOCK l,BAY DRNE ADDITTON,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 OF PLATS,PAGE 85,RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON;AND COMMENCING 606.62 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 2,SECTION 14,TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH,RANGE 1 EAST, W.M.;TT�ENCE WEST 359 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE EAST LINE OF BAY DRNE ADDITION,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 OF PLATS,PAGE 85,RECORDS OF KITSAP COUNTY,WASHINGTON; "TI�NCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO TF�SOUTF�AST CORNER OF LOT 1,BLOCK 1,SAID PLAT OF BAY DRIVE ADDITION AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE EAST ON THE EASTERLY EXT'ENSION OF Tf�SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 6.00 FEET;THENCE NOR B) ENV[RONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 Earth a) General description of the site(circle one): Flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous,other. Steep Slopes b) What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? ]H:1V c) What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay, sand,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultwal soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. Cobble, sand,gravel-Please see attached geo-tech report for more detail. d) Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe.Yes,as indicated in the attached geo-tech report,the yard has settled. e) � Describe the purpose,type,and approximate yuantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Local quarry rock for the spalls and armor rock will be brought onto the site.A total of+/- ]40 yards will be brought in. g) Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally describe. Al.l precuations and recommendations from the engineers will be followed. � � 'f0 B!:CJi�4PLf�I CG BY APPLIG11dT tVALU.4T10N FOR AGrT'C1'USE Oh�t_l' h) About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? N/A i) Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the ear�h,if any: The scope of work is designed to stop erosion and settling at the site. During construction,best management pracitices will be followed to reduce any control. 2 Air a) What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,dust,automobile,odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Exhaust from machines during working hours. b) Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. No c) Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: None 3 Water a) Surface: (i) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater, lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. Saltwater-Port Washington Narrows (ii) Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and atta.ch available plans. Yes,please review above descripton. (iii)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.Indicate the source of fill material. None (iv)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate yuantities if known. No (v) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note loca.tion on the site plan. Unknown 4 �ro se-.co:�,��:�rr-n sv�aYri.ic��.�� Fv,��u:��no.�.r-or. ,�c,�?.c��usr o1�L� (vi)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b) Ground: (i) Will ground water be withdravm,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate qaantities if known. No (ii) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals, agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c) Water runoff(including stormwater): (i) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Downspout drains are tightlined and routed to a pipe that exits at the face of the revemetment on the beach.This will remain. (ii) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: None at this time 4 Plants a) Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: � deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other � evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other � shrubs � grass ❑ pasture ❑ crop or grain ❑ wet soil plants: catta.il,buttercup,bulrush,skunk cabbage,other ❑ water plants: water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other ❑ other types of vegetation 5 'l("�131:C'0�,1PI_I:TF_[�L'1'F.PFLIC'ANT E1%:ALU:�I IQN FUF. AGE'vCY USL•ONLY b) What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Only what is necessary for consrtuction. c) List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown d) Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: None at this time 5 AnimaLs a) Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are lrnown to be on or near the site: birds: hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other: mammals: deer,bear,elk, beaver,other: fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other b) List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Salmon c) Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Unknown d) Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The project will result in no net Ioss of beach habitat by constructing the rock bulkhead no fiirther waterwazd than the exisimg concrete bullchead. 6 Energy and natural resources a) What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar) will be used to meet d�e completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing,etc. N/A b) Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. N/A c) Wliat kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: N/A 7 Environmental health � a) Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal?If so,describe. No. Machines use vegetable grease and biodegradab�e hydraulic fluid. (i) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 6 `!G Bf:C.•p:�4P1..1:'I"LD L'�'r�l'PI..1CA?`:'I� };�%qLUAl�IUi�}=0i•', AGFir'CY USE 07�'Ll' (ii) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: See above for machine fluids used. 7 TO 8r�CC�A7PLf:']'ED Fi1'AI'PLIC.4t•!'1' L\%nL,U:'�'i�10�1�0i: AGE1�'C'Y USf�ONLI' 8 Noise a) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)? During construction b) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: tra�c, conshvction,operation,other)?Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Normal working hours,as allowed by the agencies. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Complete the work as allowed. 9 Land and shoreline use a) What is the cunent use of the site and adjacent properties? SFR b) Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe.Unknown c) Describe any structures on the site. Owner's home, existing concrete bulkhead d) Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Yes,the concrete bullchead will be removed from the beach and repalced with the rock bulhead. e) What is the current zoning classification of the site?R-10 fl What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? R-10 g) If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? R-6 h) Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify.Yes,shoreline i) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A j) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A k) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: N/A 1) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Work closely with the agencies. 10 Housing 8 TO BL COiti4�•LETE•D Bl`APPLtC'P:!`:'f l:Vr1LUAfiUi�I i=0(Z AGEt�C1'USE Ot�'iY a) Approximately how many units would be provided,if any? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. N/A b) Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. N/A c) Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: N/A 11 Aesthetics a) What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A b) What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N/A c) Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 12 Light and glare a) What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A b) Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c) What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A d) Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A 13 Recreation a) What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Saltwater related b) Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: None at this time 14 Historic and cultural preservation a) Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national, state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the 9 TO BL-CO�PLC7'L-ll 13l'Af'PLICA?�'"T L'VALU=:i IOtJ FOIt AGC'�C'Y USL-ONL`' site? If so,generally describe. All material being disturbed during work have been imported. b) Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic; archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: All work will stop if something is located. 15 Transportation a) Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. 18'�St b) Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c) How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A d) Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private).�No e) Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity o�water,rail, or air transportation? If so,generally describe. No fl How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If laiown,indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/a g) Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: N/A 16 Public services a) Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection,police protection,health care,schools, other)? If so,generally describe. No b) Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. None 17 Utilities a) Circle utilities currently available at the site: eleciricity,natural gas, water,refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer, septic system,other: 10 T'O BL-C0�4PI.ETE�BY FlPl'L1CAn'T L-VALU.AZ70P:EC)R .AGE?•:CY USF..G�L`' b) Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None 11 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ...................... .. . ......1�.. ..... ...... . ........ ............................................•••................................. DateSubmitted: .................................x.�.�..�.��..�L..................................................................................... CONSTRUCTION DETAILS FOR REPLACE ROCK & CONCRETE W/ BULKHEAD �CEIVEI) 1308—18T"Street CStyo[Bremert� Bremerton,WA 98337 APR 0 3 201� n�� $t OWNER: -� P� AR�,j �� o&wAs�y��O Guy Stitt -' 1308—18`h Street � y� ' � � � _ Bremerton,WA 98337 � 1 � .c� 8 'T' �'�GISZF�� . . �S10NA1-��.. December 8,2011 � 2 —l3 s�/ TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1-3 Site Plan SEALEVEL BULKHEAD BUILDERS 2-3 Cross Sections -Vicinity Map SEALEVEL BULKHEAD BUILDERS �S�Tl� ��l � - � ._ -�o RTr llU�4s�F 1 N�►o xl ill�4R I?Q wS �1 ri�1tv i?ock Qv�,kN�� is�►NG c�s � t��"P�k.►�tG-co cR� 4' eoKc,�� _ _M_H� �[,2 F Rcac� QUL►�H-�e 13c�IsFl�F��) — _ ��} .' 1 — � GRpv��/S � � �� z' t�EA�H- -L _, � _ c�e�o� � I G---�"EdB , ` �s� �....-o a-. ��' S��/-� - . �` . '�_ `� � 1 � �(8� _ ��p wG ��t��t^ *5l ,�� LfLJ � S�� ' �� • � W 01r�NC�tS .� p,. A��;`.�'� , ��,� aF w.�s.y�,�,�f� Haus� s �- ,�� ..: • � � , � ;� � �Il . � I � f - 1 �' �P�8�..gc0 �"„ � i ,: �r- SfONAI.�G "� �a - �3 - l� ' pRl�9�v�� ' � o �� 1 �C COIY CI �E _ � L� � c�C c1�(��. lkz-- e SCALE: / �I� �D1 DRAWN BY DRAWING IUMBER ■ DATE: �/ � �� REV ISED / . `_. �- � �Ross��r�c�- A�4 v��i�r�w �� sc��,e� � =3' 19�s — , . � ��°�� '�P��K n W , � ��` � I _�, 65� Qe R T- wl4sh�r�IG-%o�c � —. , o D O �� i Prtar�cTsrT� s Q 3 0 � � M�v O � � Fc�TCR ±5' � � � FA�O?lG �t sr 3 3 �M�}ril � 6 � Q�I�RI�� o �, Q 5��.5 � � r++ � �-!I� � p �� 5 �� (3 l��M�'�1 oI�l +3' �� o � � v �� A A R�! L ' _ ��p�wA sy��c�� S i � l�.�' �� 'b O I � Z � :� x k-- ±�t' --� �� --�} _- $894 � �o�.�� Sr�NAI.��G � [2 —« — << ._ . � o o �2 - � S __.��i.�.1�� uv L-r� l�oc 13r1b.�.� r&- si � � 1 E o 3 � e SCALE: p DRAWN BY DRAWINC hIWMBER ■ DATE: �/ REV ISED O� /� . BVi X 71 PRIN7ED ON tun.�nnnw r.�Feqaw�n�r. , � CO�IS?"�1L SOLi,�T"IOIVS, LL�. 11027 Man�ou Beach DTnre NE,Bainbrtdge Istand,Washington 98110 206-459-7264 November 21,2011 a C��ED Guy Stitt q'�Bre�e� 1348 18`�St Bremerton,WA 98337 APR �� 201z Re: Geologic Slope and Beach Processes Reconnaissance D��o�r o� Stitt Pro�l'ty C0�UD1h'DeveloPment 1308 18 St Bremerton,Washington Project No. 11021 Dear Mr.Stitt: This letter-report summarizes Coastal Solutions' observations made during a recent geologic slope,coastal processes and subsurFace exploration study of the subject property. The purpose of our study was to observe and evaluate the existing shoreline conditions at the site with regard to the proposed seawall replacement project. Observations Site Conalidons�nd Topography The site is located on the westem shore of Port Washington Narrows in Bremerton, Washington. The residential properiy consists of a generally flat upland on the south side where the house and driveway were located and a steeply sloping noRhern beach slope that descended to the shoreline of Port Washington Narrows. The house consisted of a wood-frame structure with a full basement foundatioa and attached garage. The house footings were located approximately 8 feet from the top of the slope at the closest poin� The pmperty was surrounded by similaz private p�roperties to the east and west(the neighboring property to the east was undeveloped),the 18 Street right-of-way to the south,and the Port�Vashington Narmws Tidelands to the north. The slope was on the order of 30 vertical feet high as measured from the toe of the existing seawall and the prominent break in slope adjacent to the house. Slope angles for the upper approximately 25 feet were on the order of 1 H:1 V(horizontal:vertical).The lower 5 feet was protected by the existing,vertical concrete and rock seawall. Below the�toe of the seawall,the ' upper intertidal area sloped on the order of l OH:l V toward the deeper water of Port Washington Narrows. The bullchead consisted of a combination of concrete and rock that spanned the entire 75 feet of the property. We understand the house was constructed in the 1940's. The age of the seawall is unlaiown. The seawall was still providing protection from erosion but was in generally poor condition showing signs of vertical deflection,undermining,and offset cracking. We also noted what appeared to be settlement of the northern porEion of the yard as exhibited by gently sloping upland area corroborated by reports from the owner. The owner reported that gradual settlement occurred over a period of years. The owner reported no damage to the house or other portions of the site,only that the northern approximately 5 horizontal feet of the yazd adjacent to the top of the slope appeared to have settled on the order of 6 to 12 inches. The Guy Stitt November 21,2011 Project No. 11021 settlement was primarily confined to the northwest corner of the apper lot adjacent to the top of slope and a makeshift block retaining wall that separated tlte lower neighboring property to the west from the subject property. Based on our observation of surface and subsurface conditions and previous historical aerial photographs of the area,the shoreline along this reach of Port Washington Narrows appears to have been extensively modified over the last approxunately 50 years. Various erosion control construction methods including rock bulkheads,concrete seawalls, and rock/rubble revetments could be seen north and south of the site. Grading and placement of fill soils along the top of slope was also common when the residential lots were created. The settlement near the top of slope adjacent to the block retaining wall is consistent with uncontrolled fill placed to create a relatively flat lot at the subject site. Existing,Shoreline Conditions The entire shoreline at the site was protected by the existing concrete and rock seawall. The natural intertidal area east of the toe of the slope consisted largely of a gravel and cobble surface that continued to deeper water to the north. We noted a series of manholes located waterward of the ordinary high water(OHVV)mark. Based on our research,the manholes allow access to a public sanitary sewer pipe owned by the City of Bremerton. We could not confirm if this pipe system is still active at the time of our field visit. The seawall was still performing as intended but shows signs of severe deflection,cracking,undermining and erosion landwazd of the wall. In our opinion,the seawall is at high risk of further damage and and/or collapse that could result in breach and ioss of lateral support for the lower slope at the property. Cunent plaas call for the replacement of the entire 75 feet of seawall with a new, irregular- �aced,rock bulkhead. The toe of the replacement bulkhead will be constructed at the same location as the footing for the existing wall. The new rock wa�l will be on the order of 6 feet above the ground surface waterwazd of the face of the bullchead with a proposed embedment depth an the order of 4 feet below existing grade(see att�ached plans prepared by Sealevel ' Bulkhead Builders,Inc.for proposed construction details). The new rock wall will occupy the same approximate footprint within the upper intertidal area of Port Washington Nanows. The east end of the bulkhead wilt be tapered to join the existing toe of slope and the west edge will join the remains of the failed neighboring seawall. The west edge of the new bulkhead will utilize a short wing-wall or"return"to minimize end scour in the event the neighboring bulkhead faiLs to the point of exposing the intact bluff toe. �each and Coas�a/Condition� The beach consisted of an approximately l OH:l V gravel,cobble,and sand surface waterwazd of the tce of the existing seawall. Based on our observations of bamacles and other indications of periodic inundafion on the face of the existing revetment,mean higher high water(MHI�V� was located at the face of the existing seawall. The location of the current OHW line could nat be determined due to the presence of fill and the existing wall. The former OHW line is inferred to be located approximately 2 feet landward of the face of the wail based on the natural toe-of-slope conditions on the neighboring property to the east. The most recent data regarding coastal processes published by the Washington State Department of Ecology,(Ecology) �i'ashington Coastal Atlas indicated that the property lies Page 2 Guy stitt Pro•ect No. l 1021 November 21,2011 � within a littoral drift zone that begins at the Wheaton Way bridge pier to the east and extends approximately 0.6 miles to the west. Puget Sound shorelines can typically be divided into a series of individual drift cetls that contain zones along the shoreline that include erosion azeas, transport corridors,and deposition or accretion azeas. We noted no strong signs of westerly tittoral sediment movement which suggests that based on the north facing location of the site, and strong tidal currents within Port Washington Narrows, littoral drift direction in the area likely fluctuates from winter to summer. [Dr�inage The owners reported that downspout drains for the house were tight-lined and routed to a buried pipe that descends the slope taward the seawall. We could not confirm the location of the upland pipe system or the condition of the system dwing our field visi� We noted no signs of standing water or surface erosion from concentrated stormwater flow on the upland or on the slope. We noted no sigas of groundwater seepage on the slope during our field visits. Although groundwater seepage levels and flow volumes should also be expected to vary with precipitation, irrigation practices,time of year,and upland land uses both on and off-site. Comprehensive drainage analysis, including testing the downspouts during our field visit,was beyond the scope of services for this phase of the project. During construction of the new bulkhead,the inferred outfall pi�e should be located, inspected and tested to verify proper working condition. The proposed replacement bulkhead design should include a suitable storm water outfall replacement penetration through the bulkhead that the existing downspout drains can be routed toward. The replacement penetration should be placed in such a manner as not to jeopardize the integrity of the bulkhead or cause concentrated aischarge waterward of the face of the new bullchead. Vegefation Vegetation on the upland portion of the site consisted primarily of landscaped shrubs and grass tawn both surmunding the hoase. The back yard to the edge of the slope consisted largely of grass lawn. The slope was covered with scattered maple and small fir trees and a dense understory of berry bushes and ivy. We noted no signs of surface erosion on the slope. C@Ol�ry The relatively flat backyard area directly north of the house transitioned to gently sloping near the top of the slope. The owner reported that the back yard area near the top of sIope h�s experienced settlement over a period of years. During our field reconnaissance,we dug a series of hand excavations on the slope and encouatered ioose sihy sand infen�ed to be fill soils neaz the top of slope. We could not determine the depth of fill,but based on other hand excavations in the acea,the thiclmess is inferred to be on the order of 2 to 3 feet. The presence of fill waterward of the house is consistent with typicat historical fill placement during development of this type of water&ont lot The Se�ttlement is an indication of low density and/or poor compaction at the time of placement and suggests the fill was placed with no engineering oversight(monitoring moisture and compaction levels). Below the fill on ttie face of the slope,we encountered what appeared to be natural,in--place weathered sand and gravel. These soils are consistent with exposed soils east of the site on neighboring sites. Soils of this type are typically well drained and when covered with appropriate vegetation have a relatively tow risk of surface erosion or deep seated la�dslide Page 3 Guy Stitt November 21,2011 Project No. 11021 activity. We noted the founda.tion of the house was in good condition with no off-set cracking or signs of settlement,also signs that the basement foundation was likely placed on in-place na,tw�al soils. The natural sand and gravel is interpreted to be Vashon advance outwash sed'unents deposited during the last major glaciation of the Puget lowland approximately 18,000 years ago. As the Vashoa ice sheet advanced to the south,large quantities of silt,sand, and gravel were deposited in&ont of the ice sheet by high-energy pro-glacial streams. These sediments and those stratigraphically lower,were overridden and compressed by the wei�ht of thousands of feet of glacial ice. In addition to being generally well•drained,these soils exhibit relatively high shear strength and low compressibitity characteristics. Despite these characteristics sand and gravel is highly susceptible to erosion whea exposed to wave action at the beach. The existing seawall has buried the former toe of slope and has essentially stopped toe erosion in the area. The existing seawall protects natural sand and gravel at the toe of the slope which in turn protects the footing area and supports the upper slope,back yard and house fouccdation. The fill in the backyard area consisted of loose,moist,sitty sand with variable amounts of gravel. Because the fill was likely�laced without engineering oversight,the fill is highly suspect in terms of its erosion resistance and strength qualities and will likely continue to settle. Settlement confined to the fill however will likely not adversely unpact the house foundation. Despite its generally poor condition,the seawall is still providing a degree of toe protecfion and has resulted in its intended purpose of stopping toe erosion. A comprehensive"natural" bank retreat analysis could not be performed due to the long-term presence of the existing revetment and the historically placed fill soils. Conclusions Based on the existing seawall deteriorated condition,the seawall is at risk of collapse and is in need of replacement. The seawall protects the in-place natural sand and gravel that is highly susceptible to erosion if exposed to wave action. Loss of tce support at the site could result in landslide activity along the entire height of the slope. Current plans call for replacing the seawall with a rock bulkhead built at the same location as the existing seawall and removal of concrete debris from the area. Replacing the deteriorated seawall will improve drainage and will provide a more predictable erosion control structure(in terms of long-term performance). �Bt�PI'11�10/@S Shoreline erosion and stability can be addressed by several methods depending on site conditions, location,and project goals. Generally shoreline erosion control methods can range from t[ie use of planted,supplemental vegetation to control sur�ace erosion,consttvcting"soft" or bio-engineered shoreline protection systems,constructing"hard"surfaced bulkheads or rock revetments,or the application of a hybrid system that employs both hard and soft armoring techniques. Replacing an existing emsion control structure however, limits the available alternatives for the property owner to adequately protect existing improvements on the property and on adjacent properties. � Page 4 Guy Stitt November 21,2011 Project No. 11021 Supplemental Yegetation In our opinion,the existing upland vegetation is providing good surFace erosion control and should not be removed. However,removing the seawall and replacing it with vegetation at the beach level will not provide adequate erosion control needed at the site. The placement of supplemental vegetation will not contribute in any way to the protection of the properiy from wave action and has little,to no mitigating effect on wave generated toe erosion. As a result supplemental vegetation is not a viable option as a replacement for pmtection at the site. Rock Bulkhead Rock bulkheads consist of essentially vertical rock walls constructed at or near the ordinary high water line. 3,000 to 5,000 pound mcks are keyed into the beach approximately 4 to 6 feet,stacked to a typical height of approximately 6 to 8 feet above the beach surface and backfilled with free-draining rock ballast. Of the alternatives discussed in this report,rock bulkheads are the most effective method to control toe erosion over the anticipated service life of the structure. The most significant effect of constructing a rock bulkhead where no bullchead or revetrne�t existed before is reduced sedimeat input to the beach. This is the result of building a structure that is necessarily designed to stop or significandy slow toe erosion. While the effects of reduced sediment input to the beach can be mitigated,rock bulkheads result in an alteration of the shoreline as compared to natural conditions. Where a properly constructed rock bulkhead replaces an older failing structure.such as the existing revetrnent at the site,erosion control is maintained and potential adverse affects to the upper intertidal area are minimized due the reduced need for ongoing or long-term maintenance. As seawalls age maintenance increases the frequency of barge landings and heavy equipment on the upper intertidal area. A properly constructed rock bulkhead replacement at the site will result in an overall decrease in disturbance of the upper intertidal area that results from heavy construction on the beach and will result in no net loss of upper intertidal azea. Rock Revetments The second most effective erosion control method is the construction of a rock revetmen� Rock revetments are similar to mck bulkheads in that they consist of"hazd"armoring of the shoreline by constructing a sloping rock surface at the toe of the beach slope. The benefit of a revetment is a more gradual wave run-ap area at the shoreline that can reduce wave reflection and potential scour in front of the bulkhead. The negative aspects of a revetment are that their larger footprint results in a larger area of the upper intertidal that is buried and depending on their height may not provide protection for the lower slope during storm events or extreme high tides. The lower the angle of the face,the more beach area is covered. To minimize footprint and maximize the erosion control aspect of the revetment they are typically built at steep angles to take advantage of the surcharging affect of the upper rocks similar to the structural characteristics of a vertical rock bulkhead. Absent the surcharge,the rocks at the toe of a revetmetrt are more susceptible to movement and redistribution than a rock bulkhead. A rock revetment in lieu of a mck bulkhead will result in more intense and more frequent maintenance due ta a reduced face angle and would result in an unpredictable emsional environment where the revetment connects to the adjacent structures located to the east and Page 5 Guy Stitt November 21,2011 Project No. 11021 wesrt. Mare maintenance at the project site would require additional barge landings and heavy equipment on the upper intertidal ar�a. Most importandy,the r�vetment would occupy a larger footprint within the upper intertidal area due to the height of the slope in the area and the limited space to construct the revetment. Soft Bank Protection The use of"sof�'bulkhead techniques includes the combined use of beach nourishment and restrained lazge woody debris(beach logs)at the site. Beach logs are restrained using cables and an earth retention system such as dead-man anchors or tieback style earth-anchors. The logs are arranged in such a way as to impede wave energy acting on the toe of the slope. Imported beach sediments aze then placed to embed the logs aiding in energy dissipation. The beach nourishment also provides"sacrificial"sediment that is actively recruited by the natural coastal processes acting on the shore. In azeas of diminished littoral transport volume and areas where sed'unent recruitrnent is high,soft-bank protection typically results in a net loss of nourished sediment. As the sediment is eroded over time,additional nourishing sand is placed to maintain the erosion control function of the system. The amount of beach nourishment is initially estimated using average bank retreat rates for the project site but is adjusted based on actua}long•term performance. Soft bank protection is best suited for low wave-energy environments where a broad,relatively flat back-beach azea exists between the MHFiW tine and the OHW line to minimize the angle of the constructed surface and maximize the wave run-up distance. Maximizii►S the wave run- up distance on an artificial beach has the affect of reducing the overall wear to the system, which increases its longevity. Soft-bank structures are also not well suited for sites that are flanked by existing hard surface structures such as the project site(similar failing seawall to the west). A breach of the soft bank system during a storm event would not only jeopazdize upland improvements at the project site but would affect the integrity of both adjacent structures. The performance of a soft bank system is directly related to the intensity,duration and frequency of high-energy storm events. As a dynamic system,they result in the lowest overall visual and littoral impacts to the shoreline environment but provide the least amount of bank protection during storm events and require constant maintenance and construction on the beach. Hvbrid Soft-bank/Revetment Hybrid systems employ elements of both a hard surface"stopgap"component and the dynamic component of a soft-bank system. A rock revetrnent or bullchead is constructed at or above the ordinary high water line and is partially buried and fitrther protected by the addition of anchored beach logs,sand,gravel and cobbles placed as beach nourishment. The sand and logs mimic natural beach conditions on a day-taday basis and the rocks serve as a structural stop-gap measure during Iazge storm events. The benefits of a hybrid system are that they partially mimic natural coastal processes while pmviding a high level of erosion control due to the rock structure. The drawbacks to a hybrid system is that sunilar ta the soft bank system, the dynamic portion of the hybrid system(restrained logs and imported sand)will require lon� term maintenance demands that cannot be fully determined until the system has been in place Page 6 ' Guy Stitt November 21,2011 Ptoject No. 11021 � for a periad of years. Depending on the location of the hard and soft components of the hybrid,adjacent hazd-surface structures can be placed at higher risk of damage similar to the soft bank alternative. The height of the slope and lack of usable,�low-angle upper intertidal area effectively precludes the use of a soft bank/bulkhead hybrid system at the site. - A�it�gation Construction of the replacement rock bulkhead will result in a no net loss of upper intertidal beach area once the bulkhead is installed. The irregular face of the bulkhead as compared to the seawall will result in less scour and wave reflection and will r�duce the adverse affect of the existing flat-surfaced structure on the beach. Beach noutishment volume estirnating was not performed due to the extensive historical modification of the shoreline and the fact that no natural erosion(that could contribute sed'unent to the beach at the site)is cuirently occurting at the site. Recomrnendations Based on our field observations,the existing concrete seawall is at risk of collapse and is in need of replacement. To reduce the impacts of the existing failing seawall to both the upland improvements and the existing coastal processes at the site,we recommend replacing the existing seawall as proposed. The new rock bulkhead should be placed at or landward of the existing tce of the seawall. The bulkhead should be constructed flush to the adjacent natural toe-of-slope to the east and the existing shoreline protection to the west. Constructed in this manner,the proposed bulkhead wiil result in a net gain of hydraulic and littoral functions at the beach. To reduce the probability of erosion to the fill soils behind the proposed bulkhead,we recommend the following: • Verify that the existing surface water drainage systems including roof nuioff from the house are functioning properiy and can still be routed ta the beach when the new bulkhead is constructed. This pipe should be connected to an appropriate outfall near the beach that will not jeopardize the bulkhead. No concentrated flow should be allowed to discharge onto the slope. Energy dissipaters,rock splash pads and other means may be needed to reduce the likelihood of concentrated seepage at the face of the bullchead. • Place sufficient size rocks landward of the existing revetment toe to create a gravity wall system. The rocks should be piaced in a manner to provide a smooth connection to both the adjacent pmperties to the east and to the west. � Monitor the upper inferned fill area for additional settlement or more importantly,changes in the rate of settlement. Mitigating measures to control settletnent of the fill area are possible but do not depend on the existence of the bulkhead. Pl�ns d4eview We have reviewed the proposed plans prepared by Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,titled"Replace concnete seawall with a Rock Bulkhead,for Cruy Stitt, 130818`�'St., Bremerton, WA"dated 11/8/11. In our opinion,the plans as proposed are consistent with the geotechnical opinions and recommendations in this letter-report. Page 7 , � �uy sntt ��t No. i ioai November 21,201 I Lidnitations This letter-report was prepared based on a Iimited field reconnaissance and no subsurface explorations were performed. A more in-depth characterization of slope conditions and geotechnical aaalysis, including quantitative slope stability analyses for the subject property or the adjacent properties was beyond the scope of work for this study. There are inherent risks associated with construcdon in the shoreline environment. The longevity and effectiveness of shoreline armoring is higlily dependent on the frequency and severity of wavo-generating storm events that aze inherently unpredictable. Other factors that impact the effectiveness of shoreline armoring are the frequency and magaitude of upland landslide activity and erosion, and the skill and care used by the contractor during construction of the bulkhead. The opinions in this letter report are meant to help the property owner manage the natural erosion that is occurring at the site and do not constitute a legal opinion or a wan�anty,express or unplied. 'It►is letter-report was prepared for the exclusive use of Guy Stitt and his agents with specific application to the project site. It has been a pleasure to provide these services to you. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, COASTAL SOLUTIONS� LLC d��hi .r��',�',n, 5�,1� � ,�� , �'�. � � � . � . a �� ----- „ - - 21`s2—$�w �� ------------- .`g l ``20 ' . IS'�.1z ,•G.ti t � . /��tl eQ�p� �\1Y. �11�iAL ��, `�� . � . � 0�1 / �1j .� � Robert F Cousins` � �� Robert F.Coasins,LEG Piina L.Cousins,P.E. Principal Geo[ogist Principal Engineer rob�a.coastalsolns.com nina(cr�coastalsolns.com Attachments: -Construction Drawings Prepared by Sealevel Bulkhead Builders,Ina(2 sheets) cc:Jentty Powell,Sealevel Bulkhead Builders Macinta�HIY.Coastat SafaUoas LLCpro}eas 1102!-StittStitt Fioal iptduc Page 8