Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5491CONTRACT MODIFICATION AGREEMENT NO. 1 BETWEEN THE CITY OF BREMERTON AND Murray, Smith & Associates Contract # 5491 PROJECT McKenna Falls Intake Improvements CONSULTANT Murray, Smith & Associates DATE January 14, 2016 THIS CONTRACT MODIFICATION AGREEMENT SPECIFICALLY AMENDS THE AGREEMENT (the "Contract") entered into between the City of Bremerton and Murray, Smith, & Associates on July 1, 2015 All provisions in the Contract shall remain in full force and effect except as expressly modified by this document. For valuable consideration and by mutual consent of the parties, the modifications to the Contract are as follows: I. Section I. Scope , is modified as follows: Not applicable Section 11. Term , is modified as follows: The Consultant shall complete the work described in this Contract Modification Agreement by September 30, 2016. Section 111. Compensation , is modified as follows: Not applicable. H. Consultant accepts all requirements of this Contract Modification by endorsing below. Consultant further agrees that this Contract Modification constitutes full and final settlement of all of the Consultant's claims for contract time and for all costs of any kind, including without limitation, costs of delays related to any work either covered or affected by this Contract Modification, claims related to on-site or home office overhead, or lost profits. This Contract Modification does not limit the City's right to bring a claim for past performance. The undersigned consultant approves the foregoing Contract Modification as to the changes, if any, in the contract price specified for each item, including any and all supervision costs and other miscellaneous costs relating to the change in work, and as to the extension of time allowed, if any, for completion of the entire work due to said Contract Modification. CONTRACT MODIFICATION #1 Contract Number 5491 This document will become a supplement of the contract and all provisions wilt apply hereto. It is understood that this Contract Modification shall be effective when approved by the City of Bremerton. The parties whose names appear below warrant that they are authorized to enter into a contract modification that is binding on the parties of this contract. In addition, Consultant warrants that it has or will inform the surety of this change, and shall take appropriate action to modify any bonds required under the contract to address this change. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Contract Modification on the day and year first written above. City Engineer / Public Works Director approved to process Initials and Date CONSULTANT. /w By // & Its lgcwLA-50C11'4TZF- DATE:., i//�,% �Z,-,f(, APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bremerton it Attorn y NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: Brian Casey 2707 Colby Ave, Suite 1110 Everett, WA 98201 CONTRACT MODIFICATION #I Contract Number 5491 THE CITY OF BREMERTON L�7��g� / By Pat Lent Its Mayor DATE: io Z1101& ATTEST: City Clerk NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: Shannon Corin City Clerk 345 Sixth Street Bremerton, WA 98337 Contract Number: Vendor: Subject: Department: File Class: Begin Date: End Date: Review Date: Vault Date: Comments: 5491 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES INC PSA - 2015 Water Resources System Improvements Engineering GS2011-169 Rev. 1 Capital Assets (Non -Real Property) 7/1/2015 2/28/2016 3/1/2016 2017 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with Murray, Smith &_Associates, Inc. for 2015 Water Resources System Improvements Study Session Date: COUNCIL MEETING Date: Department: Presenter: Phone: GjE June 24, 2015 July 1, 2015 PW&U Bill Davis (360) 473-5758 SUMMARY: Based on an evaluation of qualified consultants, the City has selected Murray, Smith, and Associates (MSA) to provide consulting engineering services for the contract 2015 Water Resources System Improvements. The contract includes the design of three projects: 1) The McKenna Falls Intake Improvements, which includes modifications to the concrete channel, replacement of the traveling screen equipment, installation of the main stem bypass system, and evaluation of the West Branch Intake; 2) Geotechnical evaluation of the Casad Dam Overflow Rock Face; 3) Anderson Creek Pump Station 2 Sodium Hypochlorite Building. For projects 1 and 3, MSA will perform pre -design, detailed design, and construction management support. Project 2 is an evaluation with the majority of the work to be done by subconsultant Shannon & Wilson. Four consultants were sent Request for Proposals (RFPs). Two of the consultants submitted proposals and MSA was selected for the work. A scope of work was submitted and negotiated in the amount of $419,904. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Council Summary 2) Professional Services Agreement (w/ attached exhibits) FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): This contract is fully funded and is included in the 2015 Water fund budget. The McKenna Falls Intake Improvements is budgeted for $200,000; Casad Dam Overflow Rock Face Improvements is budgeted for $200,000 for design and construction; Anderson Creek Pump Station 2 Sodium Hypochlorite Building is budgeted for $100,000, for a total of $500,000 for the three projects. During the scoping process, it was determined that only $475,000 would be required for the design in 2015 and the remaining $25,000 can be reallocated for construction in 2016. STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ❑x No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑O Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $419,904 and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented. COUNCIL ACTION: [Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 01/07/15 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 2015 Water Resources System Improvements The City of Bremerton ("City") and Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"), referred to collectively as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services: I. Scope: The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the Scope of Work, dated June 2, 2015, including any attachments thereto , attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be modified only pursuant to Section VII.H of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides for unspecified additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express written request of the City. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such services are performed. II. Term: The City and the Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work described in Exhibit A is to be completed as provided for in the work schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B; provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays or extra work as provided for in Section IKA of this agreement. III. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the City shall pay Consultant in an amount not to exceed $419,904. Consultant's charges and bills shall conform to the fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. The Consultant shall submit regular billing statements detailing work performed and amount charged on each task or portion thereof. The descriptions shall conform to and fall within the categories set out in the Scope of Work and/or Fee Schedule. Upon receipt of a conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to prioritize scoped work and accelerate and/or delay work tasks under the time frame set forth in Section II herein. The Consultant's labor rates and billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibit C. Consultant shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in accordance with Exhibit C. If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold payment until the statement is brought into compliance. Such withholding does not relieve Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement. Bremerton/Murray, Smith & Associates July 2015 Water Resources System Improvements Page 1 of 7 IV. Relationship of Parties: Consultant represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its field of expertise. Consultant and its personnel are independent Consultants and not employees of the City. Consultant and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the City's employees and other Consultants. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub -Consultants of the Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub -Consultants during the performance of this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent Consultants to perform the same or similar work. As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management. The City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of managerial control over Consultant or its personnel. As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for payment of all taxes and licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State professional licensing, and City business licensing. if any taxes or fees due the City have been declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges arising from the delinquency, from any payments due Consultant. V. Indemnification: A. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with Consultant's performance of this Agreement, unless Consultant is conducting work pursuant to Subsection B below. The City's review or acceptance of any of the work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. B. Architects, Engineers and Any Other Professional Listed In and Performing Services Defined in RCW 4.24 115. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that Consultant's services provided pursuant to this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY Bremerton/Murray, Smith & Associates July 2015 Water Resources System Improvements Page 2 of 7 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. VI. Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, sub -consultants or sub -Consultants. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and 2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operationsibroad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's liability; and 3. Excess Liability insurance with limits not less than 1,000,000 limit per occurrence and aggregate. 4. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence/claim. Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant. All required policies shall be provided on an "occurrence" basis except professional liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a "claims -made" basis. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of an endorsement that is acceptable to the City, which names the City as an additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies and endorsements. The City further reserves the right to reject any unacceptable policies and/or endorsements. The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. The Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and it shall be an affirmative obligation upon Consultant to advise the City's Risk Manager by fax at (360) 473- 5161, or by certified mail, return receipt requested to City of Bremerton, attn: Risk Management, Bremerton/Murray, Smith & Associates July 2015 Water Resources System Improvements Page 3 of 7 3456 th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 within two days of the cancellation, suspension or substantive change of any insurance policy set out herein, and failure to do so shall be construed to be a breach of this Agreement. The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason, proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as evidence of coverage. VII. General Conditions: A. Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Consultant shall furnish periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Consultant shall maintain accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to substantiate all billed amounts. B. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents: Original documents, drawings, designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise. All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored at Consultant's office in Everett, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the City upon its request, and at reasonable cost. All documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software or other items prepared or furnished by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments of service with respect to the project and are the property of the City. Any reuse by the City for other than the specific purpose intended will be at City's sole risk. C. Use of Photographs and Images. Consultant shall not use or distribute photographs or images depicting City officials, personnel, property, or equipment whether prepared by Consultant or provided by City without prior written consent of the City. The City will not unreasonably withhold its consent. D. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk: Consultant shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub -consultants in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss Bremerton/Murray, Smith & Associates July 2015 Water Resources System Improvements Page 4 of 7 of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. E. Place of Work: The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this Agreement at its offices in Everett and Tacoma, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at locations mutually agreed upon by the parties. F. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement. G. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. H. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by both Parties. I. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1 st class mail, or by personal service, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. City Address: Consultant Address: 345 Sixth Street 2707 Colby Ave, Suite 1110 Bremerton, WA Everett, WA 98310 98201 J. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be deemed waiver of any other right or power. K. Non -Waiver of Breach: The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. L. Compliance with Laws: Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement. M. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court. Bremerton/Murray, Smith & Associates July 2015 Water Resources System Improvements Page 5 of 7 N. Attorneys' Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney's fees. O. Assignment: Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without the written consent of the City shall be void. VIII. Nondiscrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate in employment or services to the public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, disability, or sexual orientation except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification. IX. Termination: This Agreement shall remain in force until completion and acceptance of the services, terminated by written instrument upon mutual consent, or by the City of Bremerton for convenience. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a Party if the other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party, and the non- performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within thirty (30) days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Any Notice by Consultant shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work current through the termination date. If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement. A. Excusable Delays: The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials, equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2) any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement, the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay. B. Rights Upon Termination: In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. X. Suspension & Debarment. For contracts involving Federal funding, Consultant hereby certifies, by signing this agreement, that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, Bremerton/Murray, Smith & Associatcs July 2015 Water Resources System Improvements Page 6 of 7 suspended, proposed for debannent, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. Consultant shall provide immediate written notice to the City if at any time it learns that it is or has become ineligible for certification. Should Consultant enter into a covered transaction with another fine, Consultant agrees by signing this agreement that it will verify that the firm with whom it intends to do business is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, excluded or disqualified. CITY OF BREMERTON (signature) By: A#JrV trN77 (print, name) its: Date: Approved as to form: f Bremerton/Murray, Smith & Associates Water Resources System Improvements Page 7 of 7 MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. (signature) By:5gt'*q A/. (printed name) its: -0i' --F ce New &Vae-t4jr6 Date: (Pb31 Zal55- Attest: ./i City Clerk July 2015 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK for ENGINEERING SERVICES CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON 2015 WATER RESOURCES SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS June 2, 2015 Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. (MSA) has developed the following Scope of Work for engineering services for the City of Bremerton's (City) 2015 Water Resources System Improvements which include the McKenna Falls Intake Improvements project, the Casad Dam Overflow — Rock Face Hardening project, and the Pump Station 2 Sodium Hypochlorite Improvements project. The scope and budget have been developed based on the review of the site and existing documents, and a scoping meeting with City staff. The McKenna Falls Intake Improvements project consists of several elements that are scheduled for improvement at the intake facility and include: • Replacement of the traveling screen with a new screening system. • Modifications to the concrete channel and/or piping to eliminate the impacts of the high point and facilitate the flushing of sediment and debris through the structure. • Installation of a gravity bypass system to accommodate isolation and cleaning of the intake channel. • Investigate and potentially replace the pipeline from the West Branch Intake to increase pipeline capacity to accommodate full water rights. • Develop final design documents • Support bidding and construction services The Casad Dam is a double -curvature, thin arch dam located in a narrow valley cut through basalt flows along the east flank of Gold Mountain and about 4 miles west of the City of Bremerton. This project will include an assessment of the rock face, compare it to a previous assessment from the mid-1990s, and identify potential remediation options. The City has transitioned to the use of sodium hypochlorite as its primary disinfection method at most of its source locations. Pump Station 2 is the last source to convert from gas chlorination to sodium hypochlorite. Consulting services for this project will be limited to the design of civil site work, building structural, mechanical and electrical. The process piping and equipment will be designed, purchased and installed by the City after the building has been completed. NILUray. Smith & Associates. Inc. City of Bremerton Rine ^ 201 � 2015 W''ater Re>4)tlrces System Imp o ements: EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF WORK SCOPE OF WORK The proposed Scope of Work is for the McKenna Falls Intake Improvements (Intake) project, the Casad Dam Overflow — Rock Face Hardening (Casad Dam) project, and the Pump Station 2 Sodium Hypochlorite Improvements (PS 2) project and is divided into the following work tasks: Task I Project Management Task 2 Intake Data Collection and Field Investigations Task 3 Intake Alternatives Development Task 4 Intake Preliminary Design (30% Design) Task 5 Intake Final Design Task 6 Intake Bidding and Construction Services Task 7 Casad Dam Document Review and Preliminary Engineering Evaluation Task 8 PS 2 Preliminary Design (30% Design) Task 9 PS 2 Final Design Task 10 PS 2 Bidding and Construction Services Task 11 Management Reserve Detailed descriptions of each major work task are described below. Task 1— Project Management Under this task, MSA will manage all aspects of the project scope, schedule and budget. Project management services include: 1.1 Communication: Regular correspondence and coordination with the City's project manager regarding the progress of the project, key project milestones and critical project elements. 1.2 Reporting: Monthly progress reports, invoices and schedule updates. Develop and maintain a Project Management Plan (PMP). 1.3 Kick -Off Meeting: Conduct kick-off meeting, prepare draft and final agendas and meeting minutes. Kick-off meeting will be combined with other subtasks for efficiency as noted in the following tasks. Assumptions: • Anticipate Notice to Proceed the week of July 6, 2015. • Intake final design phase will be complete January, 2016 • Intake construction will be complete November 2016 • Casad Dam evaluation will be complete August 2015 • PS 2 final design will be complete December 2015 Jturr.n. Smith &. Associates. Inc. Cih of Bremerton June • 201i 201 i Water Rc•ources System Improticntents: FXHIBrr A-- SCOPE OF WORK 2 • PS 2 construction will be complete July 2016 Deliverables: Monthly progress reports, invoices and schedule updates. Draft and final kick off meeting agenda and minute. Draft and final Project Management Plan. Task 2 — Intake Data Collection and Field Investigations MSA shall evaluate existing conditions and collect data. Subtasks include: 2.1 Data Collection: Obtain and review existing records, drawings and data on the intake facilities. 2.2 Facility Evaluation: Conduct a field evaluation of the existing intake facility, which will include inspection of facilities, operation of equipment, drawdown of basins, inlets and other hydraulic features and other operational activities that would provide an understanding of system operations and features. During this evaluation confirm project goals and establish design criteria for the intake project. It is anticipated that this field evaluation will be combined with the kick-off meeting for the Intake project in Subtask 1.3 for efficiencies. 2.3 Screening Technologies Investigation: Conduct an investigation of screening options for the Main Branch intake. Investigation will be based on communication with and literature from vendors and manufacturers. Investigation will be presented in the workshop in Subtask 3.1 and documented in a Project Report, Subtask 4.4. 2.4 Site Survey: MSA's surveying subconsultant, Prizin Surveying, will obtain survey information utilizing available data and record information, supplementing information with field survey of the existing intake sites. The survey will obtain topographic information for the existing intake channels, structures and nearby ground features in order to provide a base map of the existing facilities and generate a detailed hydraulic profile. The work will include reestablishing/confirming local control and providing temporary benchmarks at the site as needed. 2.5 Base Map and Hydraulic Profile: Based on the survey data, supplemented with existing data, a base map and hydraulic profile will be developed of the intake facilities to be used in the evaluation of existing facilities and alternatives. Using the hydraulic profile, note capacity deficiencies of the existing system based on ability to convey full water rights. Assumptions: • City will provide all available documentation for the intake facilities, including design documents and available historic flow data. Murray. Smith & As,ociatc,. Inc. City of Bremerton June ^ 2015 2015 Water Re;;ources S\ stem Improvements: EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF WORK • City will provide access to the site and associated facilities. • City will provide operation staff and any other staff with knowledge of the existing system during the field evaluation and operate facilities to accommodate inspection. • Site Survey will be limited to existing intake facilities, additional survey data may be necessary depending on the preferred alternative selected. Deliverables: • Copies of draft and final inspection reports and survey data. Task 3 — Intake Alternatives Development MSA will evaluate data collected in the previous task, engage City staff and develop recommendations for the McKenna Falls Intake Improvements to accommodate the City's needs. Subtasks include: 3.1 Alternatives Development and Preliminary Selection: Develop up to two alternatives for each of the three project elements (screen options, impoundment modifications, and gravity bypass implementation) based on staff input and design criteria established in the previous task. Alternatives will be developed to a conceptual level that will allow review and comparison during a workshop with City staff. Conduct a workshop with City staff to review the alternatives developed and select alternatives that should be carried forward for further, more detailed evaluation, thus eliminating impractical or unfavorable alternatives. 3.2 Alternatives Evaluation: Evaluate alternatives selected in the previous task to further refine concepts and allow more detailed review and comparison. Comparison of alternatives will take into account cost, operation/maintenance considerations, implementation, permitting/environmental reviews, and other criteria established in the previous tasks. 3.3 Selection of Preferred Alternatives: In a second workshop with City staff, review alternatives with respect to system needs and criteria established in the previous tasks. Evaluate and rank alternatives and select preferred alternatives for the intake improvements. The selection of preferred alternatives will be documented in the workshop meeting minutes and later in the Project Report in Task 4. Assumptions: • City staff will participate in design development workshops. • Up to two workshops will be held as part of this task. Murray. Smith & Aswciatc�. Inc. Cite of Bremerton June - 201I 2015 Water Reaources System Impiotiements: EXHIBIT A — SCOPE OF WORK Deliverables: • Workshop meeting agendas and supporting materials. • Workshop meeting minutes documenting key design decisions and alternatives anal ysi s/preference(s). Task 4 — Intake Preliminary Design (30% Design) The preferred alternatives for the intake improvements selected in the previous tasks will be further refined to develop a 30% design plan set. For the purpose of developing this level of effort, it is anticipated that the proposed improvements will require some channel and piping modifications, installation of new valving/gates and piping and an intake screening system. These improvements will replace the existing system with a similar mechanical system or a passive system within the channel as noted below in the assumptions. The following subtasks expand on this work and are intended to provide a more thorough understanding of MSA's project approach: 4.1 Preliminary Plans: Prepare preliminary plans to 30% complete. In the preparation of the 30% design, conduct a team development workshop meeting to collaborate with City staff on the development of the proposed improvements and design elements. It is anticipated the preliminary plan set will consist of approximately 9 drawings, which may include the following sheets: Cover Sheet, Vicinity Map and Index Drawing Key Map and Survey Control Hydraulic Profile Bypass Gate Modifications — Plans and Sections Screening — Demolition Plan, Sections, and Details Screening — Mechanical Plan and Sections Channel Modifications — Plan View and Sequencing Channel Modifications — Piping Plan and Profile West Branch — Piping Plan and Profile 4.2 Cost Estimate and Project Schedule: Develop a preliminary opinion of probable construction cost and a project schedule for final design, bidding, construction and start-up. 4.3 Permitting Support: Under this subtask, MSA will support City -led permitting requirements. It is anticipated that permitting requirements will be limited to SEPA, a Critical Area Review permit, and permits for construction. 4.4 Documentation: Document the work in the previous tasks and subtasks in an entD gineering report. The report will include workshop meeting minutes and materials, the cost estimate and project schedule, the draft permit management plan, NlurraV. Smith & Associates, Inc. City of Bremerton .lune • 2015 2015 Water Reanirc:es System Improvements: I::XHIBIT A — SCOPE OF WORK geotechnical report and the preliminary plans. The report will be structured and have sufficient data to be submitted to the DOH as a Project Report. 4.5 City and DOH Review: Submit a draft report to the City for review and comments. Comments on the draft report will be incorporated into a final draft document. Comments on the preliminary plans will be carried forward into the development of the plan set in the Final Design phase. The final draft report will be submitted to DOH for review and comment. DOH comments will be reviewed with the City and incorporated into the final report as needed. Assumptions: • The 30% design plan set will be approximately 9 sheets and include key project elements. • The preliminary design will not include electrical design. • City will review 30% submittal and provide comments within about two weeks following submittal. • It is anticipated that MSA will conduct one design development workshop. • City will prepare SEPA documentation with support from MSA. • DOH comments on the Project Report are anticipated to be minimal. • The project falls under the City's Critical Area Ordinance and the stream is non -fish bearing. • A habitat assessment is not anticipated, but if required, it will be completed by the City. • No geotechnical engineering is required. The City will dig exploration pits, as deemed necessary by MSA, to better understand digging conditions and location of any shallow bedrock. • In order to develop this scope and associated fee estimate improvements anticipated include: o Replacement of the existing screen with a similar screen or a passive screening system within existing channel, o Modifications to the lower section of the concrete channel to eliminate the impact of the high point, o A bypass system that will isolate the channel and redirect water through piping to the East Branch, and o Replace all or part of the pipeline from the West Branch Intake to increase capacity. Permitting support will not require production of documentation in addition to proposed the 30% design plans. Deliverables: • Draft and final meeting agendas and minutes. • Draft and final draft of Project Report. • Final Project Report (incorporating DOH comments). • 30% Plans titurra+'. Smith & Associates, Inc. of Bremerton June ^'415 2015 water ReSnurces Sastem Improvements: EXHIBIT A — SCOPE OF WORK Task 5 — Intake Final Design The objective of this task is to develop and produce final plans and specifications necessary to publically bid and construct the project. Specifications will be developed following the 1995 CSI edition format (16 divisions) with the use of City standard language and front end contract documents. Anticipated work tasks for final design are outlined as follows: 5.1 Revised Plans and Specifications (60%): The preliminary design drawings will be revised and further developed to incorporate comments from the preliminary design review. Specifications, including full contract documents, will be developed to support the design. One design workshop/meeting will be conducted. Develop plans and specifications that are approximately 60% complete. Update cost estimate and project schedule. 5.2 City Review (60%): Three copies of the 60% complete plans and specifications will be prepared and submitted to the City for review and comment. Submittal will include an updated cost estimate and project schedule. Meet with City to review 60% submittal and discuss review comments. Prepare and maintain a review log to document comments and responses. 5.3 Revised Plans and Specifications (90%): The plans and specifications will be revised and further developed to incorporate comments from the previous 60% complete review. One design workshop/meeting will be conducted. Develop plans and specifications that are approximately 90% complete. Update cost estimate and project schedule. 5.4 City Review (90%): Three copies of the 90% complete plans and specifications will be prepared and submitted to the City for review and comment. Submittal will include an updated cost estimate and project schedule. Meet with City to review 90% submittal and discuss review comments. Update the review log to document comments and responses. 5.5 Final Plans and Specifications: Prepare final plans and specifications incorporating prior City review comments. Preparation of the final documents will include: • One full size (2204) and one half size (I I x 17) stamped hard copy plan set. • One hard copy of the specifications. • An electronic copy of the final construction drawings and specifications in Word format on CD. • Bid tabulation with updated engineer's estimate of quantities, unit prices and total construction cost. N4urray. Smith & Associates, Inc. Cite of Bremerton June • 20li N15 Watcr Resources System Improvements: EXHIBIT A — SCOPE OF WORK 5.6 Regulatory Review: Transmit two sets of final documents to DOH for plan review. Coordinate with DOH and respond to any comments DOH has during the review process (as needed). The City will be responsible for any plan review fees. Assumptions: • City will provide standard specification and contract documents. • City will review 60% and 90% submittals and provide comments within about two weeks following submittal. • The final design plan set will consist of up to 25 sheets. • Permits for construction will be led by the City. • Submit project report to City for application to DOH. • Up to two design works hopshneetings will be facilitated. • In order to develop this scope and associated fee estimate, improvements anticipated include: o Replacement of the existing screen with a similar screen or a passive screening system within existing channel, o Modifications to the lower section of the concrete channel to eliminate the impact of the high point, o A bypass system that will isolate the channel and redirect water through piping to the East Branch, and o Replace all or part of the pipeline from the West Branch Intake to increase capacity. Deliverables: • 60% and 90% plans, specifications, cost estimates and project schedule. • Review log after 60% and 90% reviews with City. • Final plans and specifications. • Meeting agendas and minutes. Task 6 — Intake Bidding and Construction Support This task includes supporting the City, on an as -requested basis, with assistance during the bidding and construction of the project. The level of support provided will be at the direction of the City up to the budget amount available under this task. Anticipated support during bidding and construction may include: 6.1 Bidding Support: Attend pre-bid meeting. At the direction of the City and up to the budget amount respond to questions from bidders, subcontractors, equipment suppliers and other vendors regarding the project, plans and specifications. Prepare draft addenda items for use by the City in preparing addenda. 6.2 Construction Support: At the direction of the City and up to the budget amount review specific construction submittals/resubmittals, assist with issuing clarifications to the construction contractor, assist with review of contractor changes and change Murray. Smith & Associates. Inc. City of Bremerton ,lune • 2015 2015 water Re,�ourees System Improvements: EXHIBIT A -- SCOPE OF WORK order negotiation, conduct site visits, and participate in construction meetings including the pre -construction meeting. 6.3 Record Drawings: Create drawings of record based on red -line drawings provided by the City. Assumptions: • The City will take the lead in all tasks associated with bidding. • The City will provide on-site inspection and will take the lead in administering and managing all aspects of the construction contract and communicating with the construction contractor. • Up to 10 submittal s/resubmittals are anticipated for review and comment by MSA. • Up to 5 requests for information (RFIs) are anticipated for review and comment by MSA. • Participate in 5 construction meetings. Participation in construction meetings will be coordinated with site visits for efficiency. • Up to 5 site visits are anticipated. • Only at the request of the City will MSA provide support services during project bidding and construction. Deliverables: • Record of bidder questions and inquiries. • Addenda documentation, as required for the City to distribute to plan holders. • Responses to submittals, clarification, changes, etc. as requested by the City. • Record drawings. Task 7 Casad Dam Document Review and Preliminary Engineering Evaluation MSA's geotechnical subconsultant, Shannon & Wilson, shall compare existing conditions to those of the slope documented roughly 20 years ago and present preliminary assessment and preliminary recommendations for improving the slope stability in the west rock slope, immediately downstream of Casad Dam. Subtasks include: 7.1 Preliminary Engineering Evaluation: Review available geotechnical data and relevant maintenance documents obtained from the City of Bremerton and review geologic and geotechnical information in existing Shannon & Wilson files relevant to the improvement of rock slope stability at Casad Dam. Provide a preliminary evaluation of geology, geologic hazards, and rock slope hardening/stabilization alternatives for the right abutment of the dam to prevent rock fall onto the single -lane access/maintenance road to the base of Casad Dam. Based on the information provided during our preliminary meeting with the City of Bremerton, a visit to Casad Dam, published reports and data, provide a preliminary assessment and preliminary recommendations for the following means for improving slope stability in the west rock slope immediately downstream of Casad Dam: Mtur,IV. S,tiith &Associates, Inc. Citi of Bretnertor. .Iunc • 2015 2015 Water Remmces System Improvements: EXHIBIT A — SCOPE OF WORK a. Periodic scaling of the fractured rock slope. This would likely have to be repeated every couple of years and heavy overflow water volumes or very cold winters with ice buildup could result in the requirement for more scaling or could result in more rock falls. b. Scaling and placement of medium weight wire mesh draped down the slope and suspended from rock anchors drilled in at the crest of the slope. Rock fall would be retained behind the mesh and slide down to the toe of the slope. c. Scaling and placement of heavy duty, cable -reinforced wire mesh draped and anchored to the slope with permanent, grouted rock dowels at a spacing designed to reinforce the rock mass and anchor the mesh securely to the slope so as to preclude large rock fragments from detaching from the rock surface. d. Any of the above with the addition of permanent rock bolts and shoterete to reinforce and stabilize the more highly fractured portions of the slope, particularly those areas centered on a fractured andesite dike that steeply traverses the basalt slope and a spillway channel that has eroded across the dike. 7.2 Report Preparation: Prepare a brief letter report documenting at least 3 methods for improving stability in the right rock abutment of the dam to reduce the number of hazardous rock falls onto the access/maintenance road at the base of the dam. This report will also include planning level estimate of overall construction costs based on recent bid prices for similar rock slope stability improvement projects. Asstcmptions: • One data collection site visit to rock face at the dam. • One meeting to discuss the brief letter report. Deliverables: • Brief Letter Report, draft and final Task 8 — PS 2 Preliminary Design (30% Design) For the purpose of developing this level of effort, it is anticipated that a new building will be constructed to house the sodium hypochlorite facilities. The proposed building will match the existing PS 2 building architecture and be sized to house two 1,200 gallon tanks, piping, pumping equipment, and other items associated with this type of system. To accommodate the proposed equipment it is anticipated that the building would be in the 400 square foot range with one room, and a foundation that will accommodate containment. The following subtasks expand on this work: :Murray. Smith &' Associates. Inc. City of Firemcrton .lune • 2015 2015 water Remources System Improvements: F,XHIBIT A —SCOPE' OF V4'ORi: 1.0 8.1 Data Collection: Obtain and review existing records, drawings and data on the PS 2 facilities. 8.2 Establish Design Criteria: Meet with staff to develop design criteria for the facilities. This will include inventorying hypochlorite facility needs including bulk storage, water supply, power, containment, etc. It is anticipated that this meeting will be combined with the kick-off meeting for the PS 2 project in Subtask 1.3 for efficiencies. A site visit will be conducted as part of the meeting to confirm record drawings and inspect facilities. 8.3 Geotechnical Engineering: Work under this subtask includes subsurface investigations and geotechnical engineering to evaluate site conditions and develop recommendations for the building's foundation design and design of a retaining wall adjacent to the roadway. It is anticipated that City staff can excavate a test pit at the location of the proposed building which can be inspected by the geotechnical engineer. 8.4 Additional Survey Data: It is anticipated that previously developed survey data will be used for the development of a base map, but will require supplemental information to verify existing data and capture additional information at the site. 8.5 Preliminary Plans: Prepare preliminary plans to 30% completion. It is anticipated the preliminary plan set will consist of approximately 5 drawings, which may include the following sheets: Title Sheet, Vicinity Map and Index Site and Piping Plan Building Plan Building Cross Sections Electrical Site Plan 8.6 Cost Estimate and Project Schedule: Develop a preliminary opinion of probable construction cost and a project schedule for final design, bidding, construction and start-up. 8.7 Permitting Support: Under this subtask, MSA will support City -led permitting requirements. It is anticipated that permitting requirements will be limited to SEPA and permits for construction. Other permits, such as shorelines, will not be necessary due to the stream designation and previous use/development of the site. Assumptions: • City staff will excavate a test pit for the geotechnical investigation. • Current survey data exists for the site and will require supplemental data. One-half day of survey work is anticipated at the site. Murray. Smith & Associates. Inc. Cite of Bremerton June • 2015 2015 hater RC'GMirees System Improvements: EXHIBIT A — SCOPE OF WORK 1.1 • Permitting requirements are limited due to the stream designation and previous development/use of the site, and are expected to include building/grading permits for construction only. • The 30% design plan set will be approximately 5 sheets and include key project elements. • City will review 30% submittal and provide comments within about two weeks following submittal. • The City will prepare SEPA documentation with support from MSA. • City will provide all available documentation for the PS 2 facilities, including cut sheets for equipment that the city will install with sufficient information to facilitate the design efforts. • City will provide operation staff and any other staff with knowledge of the existing system during the site visit. • Design is based around a CMU building with shed roof, approximately 400sf Deliverables: • 30% plans, specifications, and cost estimate. Task 9 — PS 2 Final Design The objective of this task is to develop and produce final plans and specifications necessary to publically bid and construct the project. Specifications will be developed following the 1995 CSI edition format (16 divisions) with the use of City standard language and front end contract documents. Anticipated work tasks for final design are outlined as follows: 9.1 Revised Plans and Specifications (90%): The plans and specifications will be revised and further developed to incorporate comments from the previous 30% complete review. Develop plans and specifications that are approximately 90%n complete. Update cost estimate and project schedule. 9.2 City Review (90%): Three copies of the 90% complete plans and specifications will be prepared and submitted to the City for review and comment. Submittal will include an updated cost estimate and project schedule. Meet with City to review 90% submittal and discuss review comments. Update the review log to document comments and responses. 9.3 Final Plans and Specifications: Prepare final plans and specifications incorporating prior City review comments. Preparation of the final documents will include: One full size (2204) and one half size (1 I x 17) stamped hard copy plan set. One hard copy of the specifications. Murray. Smith & ;Associates. Inc Cite of Bremerton .(uric • 2015 2015 Water ROOLirces System Improvemems: EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF WORK 1.2 • An electronic copy of the final construction drawings and specifications in Word format on CD. • Bid tabulation with updated engineer's estimate of quantities, unit prices and total construction cost. Assumptions: • City will provide standard specification and contract documents. • City will review 90% submittal and provide comments within about two weeks of submittal. • The final design plan set will consist of approximately 1 1 sheets. • Permits for construction shall be led by the City. • City will develop and submit DOH report and pay any required fees. Deliverables: • 90% plans, specifications, and cost estimate. • Final plans and specifications. Task 10 — PS 2 Bidding and Construction Services This task includes supporting the City on an as -requested basis in providing assistance during the bidding and construction of the project. The level of support provided will be at the direction of the City up to the budget amount available under this task. Anticipated support during bidding and construction may include: 10.1 Bidding Support: Attend pre-bid meeting. At the direction of the City and up to the budget amount respond to questions from bidders, subcontractors, equipment suppliers and other vendors regarding the project, plans and specifications. Prepare draft addenda items for use by the City in preparing addenda. 10.2 Construction Support: At the direction of the City and up to the budget amount review specific construction submittals, assist with issuing clarifications to the - construction contractor, assist with review of contractor changes and change order negotiation, conduct site visits, and participate in construction meetings. 10.3 Record Drawings: Create drawings of record based on red -line drawings provided by the City. Assumptions: • The City will take the lead in all tasks associated with bidding. • The City will provide on-site inspection and will take the lead in administering and managing all aspects of the construction contract and communicating with the construction contractor. • Up to 2 submittals/resubmittals are anticipated for review and comment by MSA. • Up to 5 RFIs are anticipated for review and comment by MSA. Nlurray. Smith & Associates, Inc. Cit} of Bremerton June • 2015 2015 Water Resources S\ stem Iniprovemems: EXHIBIT A -- SCOPE OF WORK 13 • Participate in 2 construction meetings. Participation in construction meetings will be coordinated with site visits for efficiency. • Up to 2 site visits are anticipated. • Only at the request of the City will MSA provide support services during project bidding and construction. Deliverables: • Record of bidder questions and inquiries. • Addenda documentation, as required for the City to distribute to plan holders. • Responses to submittals, clarification, changes, etc. as requested by the City. • Field observation reports. • Record drawings. Task 11 — Management Reserve This task provides a management reserve allowance that may be used to address unforeseen tasks necessary for any of the project components. This allowance may only be utilized based on written authorization from the City's project manager. PROPOSED ENGINEERING FEES The fee estimate shown below is based upon the proposed scope of work, basic assumptions, and the project schedule, as outlined herein. In addition, the fee estimate has been developed taking into account work that is being conducted in parallel with this project for the McKenna Falls Intake Improvements, the Casad Dam Rock Face Hardening, and the Pump Station 2 Sodium Hypochlorite Building projects, and capturing efficiencies associated with working on all three projects with the City. Smith & Associates. Inc. C;tv of Bremerton .lune • 2015 2{115 Water Resources System Improvements: EXHIBIT A — SCOPE OF WORK 14 Task Fee Estimate per Task Total Estimate per Project Task 1 — Project Management $28,973 $28,973 Task 2 — Intake Data Collection and Field Investigations $26,220 Task 3 — Intake Alternatives Development $27,884 Task 4 — Intake Preliminary Design (30% Design) $48,357 Task 5 — Intake Final Design $122,524 Task 6 — Intake Bidding and Construction Services $24,554 Intake Total $249,539 Task 7 — Casad Dam Document Review and Preliminary Engineering Evaluation $17,409 Casad Dam Total $17,409 Task 8 — PS 2 Preliminary Design (30% Design) $31,299 Task 9 — PS 2 Final Design $42,864 Task 10 — PS 2 Bidding and Construction Services $9,820 PS 2 Total $83,983 Task 11 — Management Reserve $40,000 $40,000 Total Project $419,904 Nturray. Smith &. Associates. Inc. Citv of Bremerton June • 2015 '1015 Water Resources System Improvements: EXHIBIT A — SCOPE OF WORK 1.5 Exhibit B - Project Schedule City of Bremerton 2015 Water Resources System Improvements ID' Task Name Duration Start Finish 2016 July Aug_ust September October_ November December Janua Februa Marc 715 7/12 7/19 7/26 8/2 8/9 8/16 8123 8/30 9/6 9/13 9/20 9/27�10/4�10/1110/18110/25111/1111/8111/1511/2251/29 _ 1216 12/1312/2012127 1/3 1/10 1/1=71/2411/31 12/7 2114 2/21 2128 _ R1=212=8 1 Project Management 1 151 days? Task 1 - Project Management 151 days? Notice to Proceed 0 days 1.1 -Communication 150 days?, - 1.2 _Reporting- 151 days 1.3 - Kick-off meeting -1-day McKenna Falls Intake Project 157 days? ----- -- - - Task 2 - Intake Data Collection and Field Invest: 30 days 2.1 - Data Collection 3 days Review available documentation 1 3 days 2.2 -Facility Evaluation 1 day: Field evaluation 1 day 2.3 - Screening Technologies Investigation 10 days Research screening alternatives 1 2 wks 2.4 Site Survey 20 days Survey development 4 wks, 2.5 - Base Map and Hydraulic Profile 10 days Develop hydraulic profile 10 days Task 3 - Intake Alternatives Development 1 22 days: 3.1 - Alternatives Development and Prelimi' 11 days Mon 7/6/151 Mon 2/1116 Mon 716115 Mon 2/1/16 Mon 7/6/15' Mon 7/6/15 Mon 7/61151 Sun 1/31/16 Mon 7/8/15: on 211/16 Wed 7181151 Wed 718115 Wed 7!811& Thu 2/11116 Wed 718/15:. Tue 8/18115 Thu 7!9115Mon 7/13/15 Thu 7/9/15' Mon 7/13/15 Wed 7181151 Wed 7/8/15 Wed 7!8/15; Wed 7/8/15 Wed 7/8/15 Tue 7121115 Wed 7181151 Tue 7/21/15 Wed 7/8/15' Tue 814115 Wed 7/8/151 Tue 8/4/15 Wed 8/5/15 Tue 8/18/15 Wed 8/5/15; Tue 8/18/15 Wed 8/12/151 Thu 9110115 Wed 8/12/15! Wed 8128115 716 7 7 Notice to Proceed 1 --......._......-._.._._.._........._. _ .__ _........._ _ ....._..........._.. ......--............. ........................_.__,....._...._...,.........._.................._......._....._ ...._ ......_._..... _.. _..................._........_. _......... --.... _............... _.............__ ... _.........._.._ ._............. Q g -off meeting 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Review available documentation evaluation ' Research screening altern tives qFM Survey development ..... ... .... ........._........... ... .. I , , Develop hydraulic profile -, -� - Develop alternatives Develop preferred alternatives 9110 Review workshop ' - LIDIevelopminary plans al review ost estimate and schedule Support City permitting efforts dop Engineering Report b 1016 �mit-Ipt and 30% Plans to City , 10/21 Review mtg with City Revise report 10 28 fans to DOH 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Develop alternatives 2 wks Wed 8/12/151 Tue 8/25/15 Alternatives workshop ! 1 day Wed 8126/15; Wed 8/26/15 3.2 - Alternatives Evaluation 10 days. Thu 8/27/15; Wed 9/9!15 Develop preferred alternatives 2 wks Thu 8/27/15 Wed 919/15 3.3 -Selection of Preferred Alternatives 1 1 day' Thu 9/10/151 Thu 9/10115 Review workshop 1 day Thu 9/10/151 Thu 9/10/15 Task -4- intake Preliminary Design 59 days Fri 9/11/15; Wed 1212/15 - -- ------------------- 4.1 - Preliminary Plans 18 days Fri 9111115 Tue 10/6/15 Develop preliminary plans 3 wks: Fri 9/11/15; Thu 10/1/15 30% internal review 3 days; Fri 10/2/15Tue 1016/15 ----- ---- -- ---- -- .. ------------------- -- ----- - ---- --...._....._.. 4.2 - Cost Estimate and Project Schedule 3 days Fri 10/2/15; Tue 1016115 Develop cost estimate and schedule 3 days Fri 10/2115' Tue 10/6/15 4.3 - Permitting Support 20 days Wed 10/7/15; Tue 1113/15 Support City permitting efforts 4 wks Wed 10/7/15; Tue 11/3/15 iT 4.4 - Documentation 15 days, Fri 9/11/15 Thu 1011/15 -- ._.....__.... ............- Develop Engineering Report 3 wks: Fri 9/11/15' Thu 10/1/15 4.5 -City and DOH Review ! 41 days Tue 10/81151 Wed 1212115 Submit Rpt and 30% Plans to City E 0 days Tue 10/6/15; Tue 10/6/15 -------------- ---- - ... - -- - - ..... - - --- - ................. --------- --=----------- - -- Review mtg with City 1 day Wed 10/21/151 Wed 10/21/15 Revise report 1 3 days Thu 10/22/151 Mon 10/26/15 Submit report and plans to DOH 0 days; Wed 10/28/151 Wed 10/28/15 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Project: Bremerton Water System Imprc Date: Mon 6/8115 Task Split .. ... Progress Milestone ® Deadline_ Summary - External Tasks - c Project Summary `'� External Milestone <J Page 1 Exhibit B - Project Schedule City of Bremerton 2015 Water Resources System Improvements ID Task Name Duration I Start Finish 2016 Jul _ _ Au ust September October _ 6/2116128 715 7/12 7/19 17/26 8/2 1 8/9_ ,8/116 8/23 8/30 1 916 9/13 9/20 9/27 110/4 110/11110/1]10/25 November December I January February Marc_ 11/1 11/8 11/1511/22;11/212/6 12/1312/2012/27 1/3 1110 1/17 1/24 1131 ` 2R 2/14 2/21 2/28 53 _ Receive DOH comments 1 0 days. Wed 11125/15, Wed 11/25/15 ----- ---- - -- - - -- � -- -... ---h-_- - Revise and Submit Final Report ! 1 wk Tu 11/26/15! Wed 12/2/15 _.. Task 5 - Intake Final Design 68 days Thu 10/22/151 Mon 1/25116 6.1-- 60%Plans and Specifications 25 days' Thu 10122/15 Wed 11/25115 Develo 60% Plans and S s 4 wks. Thu 10/22/15 Wed 11/18/15 P P� Internal 60% Review 1 wk Thu 11119/15: Wed 11/25/15 Submit 60% documents 0 days Wed 11125/15' Wed 11/25/15 5.2 - City 60%Review 10 days' Thu 11/26/16 Wed 12/9115 60% Review period j 2 wks Thu 11/26/15 Wed 12/9/15 5.3 - 90%Plans and Specifications 20 days Thu 11/26/15: Wed 12/23/15 Develop 90% Plans and Specs 3 wks Thu 11/26/151 Wed 12/16/15 Intemal 90% Review 1 wk Thu 12/17/151 Wed 12/23/15 Submit 90% documents 0 days Wed 12/23/151 Wed 12/23/15 5.4-- City 90% Review 10 days Thu 12/24/15; Wed 1/6116 --- - ---- 90% review period 2 wks Thu 12/24/15; Wed 1/6/16 5.5 - Final Plans and Specifications I 13 days Thu 117/161 Mon 1/25/16 Develop final plans and specs 2 wks Thu 117!16; Wed 1/20/16 Submit final plans and specs 0 days Mon 1/25/161 Mon 1125/16 5.6 -Regulatory Review ' 23 days Wed 12/23/16 Mon 1/25116 Submit documents to DOH 0 days Wed 12/23/15 Wed 12/23/15 Incorporate DOH comments 3 days Thu 1/21/16 Mon 1125/16 I —Task-6 - Intake Bidding and Construction Supp; 3 days? Tue 2/9/16' Thu 2111/16 6.1 - Bidding Support 1 day? Tue 2/9/16' Tue 2/9/16 6.2 - Construction Support i 1 day? Wed 2110/16 Wed 2/10/16 .---------...--- ------.... - -----...._.._. --- 6.3 -Record Drawings 1 day? Thu 2111/161 Thu 2111/16 Casad Dam Rock Face Evaluation 22 days; Thu 7/23/15] Fri 8/21/15 Task 7 -Casad Dam Document Review and Pre; 22 days Thu 7!231151 Fri 8121115 _ --------=-------------------------- -- — - - - ..._................. 7.1 -Preliminary Engineering Evaluation 1 day. Thu 7/23/151 Thu 7/23/15 - ---- — -- - .._....- -- --- - - - -- - --- - -- - - - - --- - -- Field Evaluation 1 day Thu 7/23/15 Thu 7/23/15 - - - - ......... - -------- ----.----------- ---------------- - - - -- -=-...._- ........... ----- 7.2 -Report Preparation 21 days Fri 7/24/15 Fri 8!21115 ._._.... .._-_._..._._.__...............-.--_....____.._._..-.. ----- _...._i. ____.._..__.___._.__._ Prepare report i 3 wks Fri 7/24/15 Thu 8113/15 Submit report to City 0 days Thu 8/13/151 Thu 8/13115 - - -------Report--....--- - ---------- review meeting 1 day Fri 8/21/15: Fri 8/21/15 - -- - -- ------- ------ - - - -- ...._._.. - --- — -- -- - --- --------------- ----------...89 1- - - - - - - ---- - ----------------- -- ...- ------=--------....------------- ----- -- - -- Pump Station 2 Hypochlorite Conversion Project 85 days?, Wed 7/8/15 Tue 1113/15 ------------ - - - ------ -- --...... - - - - - -- - - _ .... -- - , Task 8 - PS 2 Preliminary Design ! 52 days Wed 7/8/15; Thu 9/17115 8.1 - Data Collection 3 days Thu 7l9/15j Mon 7/13/15 - - -- - - - -...- -.... - - ----- - - ---------- ------ - - Review available documentation 3 days Thu 7/9/15 Mon 7/13/15 _44-- --E-,s-t-a-b-l-i-s--h Design Criteria 1 day Wed 7/8115; Wed 7/8115 ---------.... --... _. _... __.. _...------------------- ;------ - Discuss design parameters with city 1 day Wed 7/8/15: Wed 718/15 - ..__.._.. .._.... - - - ...----- ------------------ ._...----- -..._.__..............--._....._._ ....... -- ....:.... ... - - 8.3 - Geotechnical Engineering 11 days Thu 7/23!15' Thu 8/6/15 ' 71 11/25 Receive DOH comments , Revise and Submit Final Report Develop 60% Plans and Specs Internal 60% Review 11/25 Submit 60% documents 60% Review period Develop 900% Plans and Specs - --- - - Internal 90% Review 12123 Submit 90% documents 90% review period, ; velop final plans and specs" 1125 Mmi. nal plans and specs 12123 ts{o H Incorporate DOH comments Field Evaluation , , „N Prepare report 8/13 +-& mit report to City 8/21 Q Report review meeting available documentation parameters with city 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 712 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 � Re iew Discus design 93 94 95 96 Project Bremerton Water System Imprc Date: Mon 6/8115 Task _ .._ _ Progress Summary External Tasks Deadline Split Milestone ® Project Summary ___ External Milestone 0 Page 2 p,. Exhibit B - Project Schedule City of Bremerton .2015 Water Resources System Improvements ID Task Name Duration ; Start Finish 2016 Jul Au ust September October November December _LJanua February Marc 6/28 _ _ 7/5 7/12 7/1917/261 8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 916 9/13 9120 9/27 10/4 10/1110/18110125 _ 11/1111/8 11/15r1/22r11/29 12/6 12!131212012127 1/3 1/10 1/17 1124 1/312/7 2/14 2121 2/28 97 Site investigation 1 day Thu 7/23/151 Thu 7/23/15 712 Site investigation Develop and submit report 2 wks Fri 7124!15! Thu 816/15 — — Develop and submit report 98 --...----... .. -- — 8.4 -Additional Survey Data -- 15 days - Wed 7/8/15; Tue 7/28/15 ' 99 Survey development 3 wks Wed 7/8/15 Tue 7/28/15 Survey development 100 101 8.5 - Preliminary Plans 12 days Wed 7/29/151. Thu 8113/15 Develop 30% Plans 2 wks Wed 7/29/15: Tue 8/11/15 ^� _ Develop 30% Plans 102 Internal Review 2 days. Wed 8/12/15' Thu 8113/15 Internal Review 103 Submit 30% Documents 8.6 --Cost Estimate and Project Schedule 0 days 1 day Thu 8/13/151 Thu 8/13/15 Wed 8112115 Wed 8/12/15 8113 0% Documents 104 105 106 Develop cost estimate and schedule 8.7 - Permitting Support 1 day 20 days Wed 8112/15; Fri 8121115: Wed 8/12115 Thu 9/17/15 Dev op c st estimate and schedule ' 107 Support City permitting efforts Task 9 - PS 2 Final Design 4 wks I 35 days. Fri 8/21/15 Thu 9/17/15 Fri 8!28115; Thu 10115115 Support City permitting efforts 108 109 110 6.1-- 90% Plans and Specifications I 15 days Fri 8128/15; Thu 9117115 111 Develop 90% Plans and Specs Internal 90% Review ! 2 wks ! 1 wk Fri 8/28/15 Thu 9/10/15 Fri 9/11/15; Thu 9/17/15 Develop 90% Plans and Specs Internal 90% Review 112 113 Submit 90% documents - - -- - - _.. -- - 9.2 -City 90% Review I 0 days --- ays ! 10 days — Thu 9/17/15 Fri 9/18/15' Thu 9/17/15 Thu 10/1115 o 9117 Submit 90 /o documents 114 115 90% review period 9.3 - Final Plans and Specifications 2 wks j 10 days Fri 9/18/151 Fri 1012115; Thu 10/1/15 Thu 10115115 90% review period 116 117 Develop final plans and specs 2 wks Fri 10/2115; Thu 10/15/15 _; Develop final plans and specs 118 Submit final plans and specs 0 days Thu 10/15/15: Thu 10/15/15 10115 nal plans and specs 119 120 --- - -- - ..—_ . ----- Task 10 - PS 2 Bidding and Construction Servii 3 days? 10.1 - Bidding Support -1-day?, Fri 10/30/16. Fri 10/30115; Tue 11/3115 Fri 10/30/15 121 122 10.2 - Construction Support 1 day? Mon 11/2/15; Mon 1112115 p, 123 124 -- --- --------------- - 10.3 - Record Drawings j 1 day? Tue 1113/15 Tue 11/3115 Project: Bremerton Water System Imprc Task _.. _. ,. __ - __,- . ,._, Progress Summary External Tasks Deadline v Date: Mon 6/8/15 Split Milestone ® Project Summary r" �— T' External Milestone 0 Page 3 EXHIBIT C 2015 WATER RESOURCES SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS CITY OF BREMERTON PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE City of Bremerton Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. 2015 Water Resources System Modifications June 2015 Engineers/Planners GAPDX_BD\Clients\Bremerton, City of\Watcr System Improvements 3-15\Scopmg\Brcmcrton Combined Fee Estimate 6-1-2015 xis Task 1 - Project Management Task 1 Subtotal $ 28,973 Task 2 - Intake Data Collection and Field Investigations Task 2 Subtotal $ 26,220 Task 3 - Intake Alternatives Development Task 3 Subtotal $ 27,884 Task 4 - Intake Preliminary Design (30% Design) Task 4 Subtotal $ 48,357 Task 5 - Intake Final Design Task S Subtotal $ 122,524 Task 6 - Intake Bidding and Construction Services Task 6 Subtotal $ 24,554 Intake Project Total Tasks 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 $ 249,539 Casad Dam Document Review and Preliminary Task 7 - Engineering Evaluation Task 7 Subtotal $ 17,409 Casad Dam Project Total Task 7 $ 17,409 Task 8 - PS 2 Preliminary Design 30% Design) Task 8 Subtotal $ 31,299 Task 9 - PS 2 Final Design Task 9 Subtotal $ 42,864 Task 10 - PS 2 Bidding and Construction Services Task 10 Subtotal $ 9,820 PS 2 Project Total Tasks 8, 9, and 10 $ 83,983 Task 11 - Management Reserve Task 11 Subtotal $ 40,000 TOTAL - ALL TASKS is 419,904 City of Bremerton Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. 2015 Water Resources System Modifications June 2015 Engineers/Planners GAPDX_BD\Clients\Bremerton, City of\Watcr System Improvements 3-15\Scopmg\Brcmcrton Combined Fee Estimate 6-1-2015 xis Y EXHIBIT C 2015 WATER RESOURCES SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS CITY OF BREMERTON PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE City of Bremerton Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. 2015 Water Resources System Improvements June 2015 Engineers/Planners Inntke Project G.\PDX_BD\Clents\Bremcrton, City of\Water System Improvements 3-I5\Seoping\Brcmer1on Combined Fee Ftlimate 6-1-2015 xIs Principal Engineer V $212 Perry Professional Engineer VIII $169 Casey Professional Engineer VII $161 Meyer/Hardy/S Engineering Designer I $110 Sexton[Huang Technician III $115 Williams Administrative I $77 Bostic. Hours Labor Geotech S&W ESTIMATED FEES Subconsultants Survey Structural Electrical Prizm PSE R&W Expenses Total Task 2 - Intake Data Collection and Field Investigations Task 2.1 - Data Collection 6 8 14 $ 2,302 $ - $ 2,302 Task 2.2 - Facility Evaluation 6 8 8 22 $ 3,912 $ - $ 3,912 Task 2.3 - Screening Technologies Investigation 2 8 26 2 38 $ 6,116 $ - $ 6,116 Task 2.4 - Site Survey 10 10 $ 1,690 $ 5,000 $ 50 $ 6,740 Task 2.5 - Base Map and Hydraulic Profile 10 24 12 46 $ 6,934 $ 216 $ 7,150 Task 2 Subtotal 8 42 66 0 12 2 130 $ 20,954 $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ 266 $ 26,220 Task 3 - Intake Alternatives Development Task 3.1 - Alternatives Development and Preliminary Selection 2 16 44 16 16 2 96 $ 13,966 $ 288 $ 14,254 Task 3.2 - Alternatives Evaluation 2 12 32 12 8 66 $ 9,844 $ 144 $ 9,988 Task 3.3 - Selection of Preferred Alternatives 4 8 8 2 22 $ 3,642 $ - $ 3,642 Task 3 Subtotal 8 36 84 28 24 4 184 $ 27,452 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 432 $ 27,884 Task 4 - Intake Preliminary Design (30% Design) Task 4.1 - Preliminary Plans 2 24 40 40 44 12 162 $ 21,304 $ 1,000 $ 892 $ 23,196 Task 4.2 - Cost Estimate and Project Schedule 3 8 12 23 $ 3,115 $ - $ 3,115 Task 4.3 - Permitting Support 6 8 8 4 26 $ 3,530 $ 244 $ 3,774 Task 4.4 - Documentation 2 8 40 24 8 82 $ 11,472 $ 200 $ 11,672 Task 4.5 - City and DOH Review 4 24 8 4 40 $ 6,500 $ 100 $ 6,600 Task 4 Subtotal 8 65 104 76 52 28 333 $ 45,921 $ - $ - $ 1,000 $ - $ 1,436 $ 48,357 Task 5 - Intake Final Design Task 5.1 - Revised Plans and Specifications (60%) 6 24 80 80 102 8 300 $ 39,354 $ 5,000 $ 3,000 $ 1,936 $ 49,290 Task 5.2 - City Review (60%) 8 8 16 $ 2,640 $ 50 $ 2,690 Task 5.3 - Revised Plans and Specifications (90%) 8 24 56 60 72 16 236 $ 30,880 $ 2,000 $ 5,000 $ 1,396 $ 39,276 Task 5.4 - City Review (90%) 8 8 16 $ 2,640 $ 50 $ 2,690 Task 5.5 - Final Plans and Specifications 2 16 32 40 50 24 164 $ 20,278 $ 2,000 $ 3,000 $ 1,100 $ 26,378 Task 5.6 - Regulatory Review 8 4 2 14 $ 2,150 $ 50 $ 2,200 Task 5 Subtotal 16 88 188 180 224 50 746 $ 97,942 $ - $ - $ 9,000 $. 11,000 $ 4,582 $ 122,524 Task 6 - Intake Bidding and Construction Support Task 6.1 - Bidding Support 20 8 6 4 4 42 $ 6,096 $ 72 $ 6,168 Task 6.2 - Construction Support 38 12 10 4 64 $ 9,762 $ 1,000 $ 1,500 $ - $ 12,262 Task 6.3 - Record Drawings 1 4 8 1 20 1 32 $ 4,264 $ 500 $ 500 $ 860 $ 6,124 Task 6 Subtotal 0 62 28 16 24 1 8 138 $ 20,122 1 $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ 2,000 $ 932 $ 24,554 40 293 470 300 336 1 92 1531 McKenna Falls Intake Project Total Tasks 2, 3 4, 5 and 6 $ 249,539 City of Bremerton Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. 2015 Water Resources System Improvements June 2015 Engineers/Planners Inntke Project G.\PDX_BD\Clents\Bremcrton, City of\Water System Improvements 3-I5\Seoping\Brcmer1on Combined Fee Ftlimate 6-1-2015 xIs EXHIBIT C 2015 WATER RESOURCES SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS CITY OF BREMERTON PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE City of Bremerton Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc 2015 Water Resources System Modifications June 2015 Engineers/Planners Casad Dam Abutment G:U'DX_MClients\Bremerton, City of\Water System Improvements 3-15%Scopmg\13remerton Combined Fee Estimate b1--2015.xis ESTIMATED FEES Principal Engineer V $212 Professional Professional Engineering Engineer VIII Engineer VII Designer I $169 $161 $110 Technician III $115 Administrative I $77 Hours Labor Subconsultants Expenses Geotech Survey Structural Electrical S&W Prizm PSE R&W Total Perry Casey Meyer/Hardy/Sz Sexton/Huang Williams Bostic Casad Dam Document Review and Preliminary Task 7 - Engineering Evaluation Task 7.1 - Prefirrtinary Engineering Evaluation 8 8 $ 1,352 $ 9,429 $ 50 $ 10,831 Task 7.2 - Report Preparation 2 4 4 10 $ 1,408 $ 5,170 $ - $ 6,578 Task 7 Subtotal 2 1 12 0 0 0 4 18 $ 2,760 $ 14,599 $ - I $ - $ - $ 50 $ 17,409 2 1 12 0 0 0 4 18 Casad Dam - Rock Face Assessment Total Tasks 7, 8, and 9 $ 17,409 City of Bremerton Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc 2015 Water Resources System Modifications June 2015 Engineers/Planners Casad Dam Abutment G:U'DX_MClients\Bremerton, City of\Water System Improvements 3-15%Scopmg\13remerton Combined Fee Estimate b1--2015.xis EXHIBIT C 2015 WATER RESOURCES SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS CITY OF BREMERTON PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE City of Bretherton Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. 2015 Water Resources System Modifications June 2015 EngineerctPlanners PS 2 Project GAPDX_BD\Chents\Bremcrton, City onwater System Improvements 3-15\ScopinLABrcmer1on Combined Fee Estimate 6-I 2015.xls Principal Engineer V $212 Perry Professional Engineer VIII $169 Casey Professional Engineer VII $161 Meyer/Hardy/Sza Meyer/Hardy/S Engineering Designer I $110 SextontHuang Technician III $115 Williams Administrative I $77 Bostic Flours Labor Geotech S&W ESTIMATED FEES Subconsultants Survey Structural Electrical Prizm PSE R&W Expenses Total Task 8 - PS 2 Preliminary Design (30% Design) Task 8.1 - Data Collection 5 6 1 12 $ 1,582 $ $ 1,582 Task 8.2 - Establish Design Criteria 8 4 1 13 $ 1,869 $ 50 $ 1,919 Task 8.3 - Geotechnical Engineering 4 4 $ 676 $ 2.800 $ $ 3,476 Task 8.4 - Additional Survey Data 4 4 $ 676 $ 3,000 $ - $ 3,676 Task 8.5 - Preliminary Plans 2 8 28 24 32 2 96 $ 12,758 $ 1,000 $ 2,250 $ 576 $ 16,584 Task 8.6 - Cost Estimate and Project Schedule 2 4 8 14 $ 1,862 $ - $ 1,862 Task 8.7 - Permitting Support 2 4 8 2 16 $ 2,056 $ 144 $ 2,200 Task 8 Subtotal 2 33 36 42 40 6 159 $ 21,479'7$-2,800$ $ 3,000 1,000 $ 2,250 $ 770 $ 31,299 Task 9 - PS 2 Final: Design Task 9.1 - Revised Plans and Specifications (90%) 4 8 36 36 40 10 134 $ 17,326 $ 8,500 $ 3.000 $ 820 $ 29,646 Task 9.2 - Cit Review (90% 4 4 8 $ 1,320 $ 50 $ 1,370 Task 9.3 - Final Plans and S ecifications 2 6 12 12 12 6 50 $ 6,532 $ 2,000 $ 3,000 $ 316 $ 11,848. Task 9 Subtotal 6 18 52 48 52 16 192 $ 25,178 $ - $ - $ 10,500 $ 6,000 $ 1,186 $ 42,864 Task 10 - PS 2 Bidding and Construction Services Task 10.1 - Bidding Support 10 4 1 15 $ 2,207 $ - $ 2,207 Task 10.2 - Construction Support 14 3 1 18 $ 2,926 $ 500 $ 500 $ - $ 3,926 Task 10.3 - Record Drawings 6 12 1 19 $ 2,471 $ 500 $ 500 $ 216 $ 3,687 Task 10 Subtotal 1 0 30 3 4 12 3 52 $ 7,6041$ - $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,0001s 216 $ 9,820 8 81 91 94 104 25 403 PS 2 Hypo Conversion Project Total Tasks 10, 11, 12, and 13 )1 83,983 City of Bretherton Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. 2015 Water Resources System Modifications June 2015 EngineerctPlanners PS 2 Project GAPDX_BD\Chents\Bremcrton, City onwater System Improvements 3-15\ScopinLABrcmer1on Combined Fee Estimate 6-I 2015.xls Client#: 335837 MURRASMII SV9J ACORD,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE TE D 9/03/ /DD/YYYY) 9/03/2015 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Kibble & Prentice, a USI Co PR 601 Union Street, Suite 1000E Seattle, WA 98101 CONTACT NAME: PHONE A A/C No Ext): 206 441-6300 .JC No : 610-362-8528 -MAIL ADDRESS: pl.certrequest@usi.biz INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A: XL Specialty Insurance Company 37885 SEP 1 0 2015 INSURED Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. 121 SW Salmon, Suite 900 City of Bremerton INSURER B - INSURER C: Portland, OR 97204 Risk Management INSURER D: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE FIOCCUR INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: RFVISION NIIMRFR- THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. IN TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSR SUBR VA POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF MM/DD/YYYY POLICY EXP MM/DD/YYYY — LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE FIOCCUR DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES Ea occurrence $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ _ GENERAL. AGGREGATE $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMITAPPLIES PER: POLIC'I I. PRO LOG PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ -- � $ --- AUTOMOBILE AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (E,. ant) _ $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INJURY Per accident $ ( ) NON -OWNED HIRED AUTOS AUTOS I PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident $ $ _ UMBRELLA LIAR OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ _ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N / A WC STATU- OTH- Y IMI E E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below _ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITJ$ $ A Professional DPR9725407 9/04/2015 09/04/2016 $2,000,000 per claim Liability $4,000,000 annl aggr. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) RE: MSA Project No. 15-1690/ Bremerton Water System Improvements 2015. This Certificate is issued in respects to above referenced. �Qn r rr"Im r r_ nvLur_n L;ANGtLLA 1 ION City of Bremerton 345 Sixth Street Bremerton, WA 98310 ACORD 25 (2010/05) 1 of 1 #S16130941/M16130229 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE @ 1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 110 11y", Client#: 335837 MURRASM11 5u q ) ACORDTN CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCEDATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 9/06/2016 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER USI Kibble & Prentice PR 601 Union Street, Suite 1000 RECEIVED Seattle, WA 98101 SEP 2 O 2016 0I6 CONTACT NAME: PHONIE — IFAX A/c No El: 441-6300 AC, No, 610-362-8528_ ADDRESS: PL.CertRequest@usi.com INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC >x INSURER A: Colony Specialty Insurance Comp 36927 INSURER B - - - INSURED Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. 888 SW 5th Ave, Suite 1170 City of Bremerton Risk Management Portland, OR 97204 INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E : INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. �TFR TYPE OF INSURANCE NSRL SUBR WVD POLICY NUMBER MM/DDY EFF MM/DDNYYP LIMITS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ JCLAIMS -MADE U OCCUR PREMISESOEaoccurrence $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRO - GENERAL AGGREGATE $ POLICY JECTD LOC PRODUCTS -COMP/OP AGG $ $ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT Ea accident OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS _ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ Per accident UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE DED I I RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION PEROTH- AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ N/A E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ ----- --- - - E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below 9/04/2016 09/04/2017 E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ $2,000,000 per claim A Professional IAE133390 Liability $4,000,000 annl aggr. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) RE: MSA Project No. 15-1690/ Bremerton Water System Improvements 2015. This Certificate is issued in respects to above referenced. City of Bremerton 345 Sixth Street Bremerton, WA 98310 ACORD 25 (2014/01) 1 of 1 #S18548382/M18544923 NL;t:LLA I IUN SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD MDKZP This page has been left blank intentionally. Asp, t MURRSMI-01 DDRAPER ACORN" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 0E(MMID017 E (MMID DATE D/YYYY) THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER] THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Albany Office PayneWest Insurance, Inc. 1025 Bain Street SE Albany, OR 97322 CONTACT PHON No, Ext): (541) 9264291 FAX (A/C, No):(541) 926-4298 ADDRESS: INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A: Argonaut Insurance INSURED INSURER B: INSURER C : Murraysmith, Inc INSURER D: ' 888 SW 5th Avenue STE 1170 Portland, OR 97204 INSURER E: �1 INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAIDICLAIMS. ILT R LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSD SUBR WVD POLICY NUMBER POI -ICY EFF MM/DD/YYYY POLICY EXP MM/DD/YYYY LIMITS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE ❑ OCCUR i EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES Ea occurrence $ MED EXP Anyoneperson) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ _ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC GENERAL AGGREGATE $ I I PRODUCTS -COMP/OP AGG $ $ OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT Ea accident $ _ BODILY INJURY Per erson $ ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS I BODILY INJURY Per accident $ HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident $ $ UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE DED RETENTION $ $ I WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y/N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below N / A i PER OTH- STATLITE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE -EA EMPLOY EE $ ' E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $ A Professional Liab IAE4197842 09/04/2017 09/04/2018 Each Claim 2,000,0 0 A Professional Liab IAE4197842 09/04/2017 0 4/2018 I Aggregate 4,000,00 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/ LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more spacells required) Professional Liability renewal certificate -Revised Certificate RE: MSA Project No. 15-1690/ Bremerton Water System Improvements 2015. I �I CERT iFiGAT t HOLDER CANCELLATION ^"""" `�""�"'�► ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACOIRD I SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE City of Bremerton THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN 345 Sixth Street ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Bremerton, WA 98310 AUTHORIZED .REPRESENTATIVE A/�AI"f rl 1f ^"""" `�""�"'�► ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACOIRD KIBBLE & PRENTICE A USI COMPANY CERTIFICATE RETURN MAIL PROCESSING P.O. BOX 5007 NOVATO, CA 94948-5007 CITY OF BREMERTON 345 6TH ST STE 600 BREMERTON WA 98337-1.873