Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5240 ORDINANCE NO. 5240 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, establishing a planned action for the Gorst Urban Growth Area pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act WHEREAS, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and implementing rules provide for the integration of environmental review with land use planning and project review through designation of "Planned Actions" by jurisdictions planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA), and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA, and WHEREAS, to guide Gorst's growth and redevelopment, the City has engaged in extensive watershed characterization and subarea planning for Gorst and have adopted amendments to their Comprehensive Plan including the Gorst Subarea Plan, and WHEREAS, the City has received a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency's Watershed Management Assistance Program to develop a Comprehensive Watershed Plan for sustainable development and restoration of the Gorst Creek Watershed, and also received support from the participation of Gorst property owners, regional stakeholders, and government agencies including Kitsap County, and WHEREAS, the City approved a planned action ordinance (Ordinance No 5189) for part of the Gorst Creek Watershed for the South Kitsap Industrial Area, which was separately approved for a planned action in 2012, and WHEREAS, the City desires to designate a separate Planned Action for the full Gorst Urban Growth Area (UGA) which is a portion of the Gorst Creek Watershed, and WHEREAS, designation of a Planned Action expedites the permitting process for subsequent, implementing projects whose impacts have been previously addressed in a Planned Action environmental impact statement (EIS), and thereby encourages desired growth and economic development, and WHEREAS, the Gorst Planned Action EIS identifies impacts and mitigation measures associated with planned development in the Gorst UGA, and WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations and ordinances which will help protect the environment, and is adopting regulations specific to the Gorst UGA which will guide the allocation, form and quality of desired development, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Rules, set forth in BMC 20.04.205 provide for Planned Actions within the City, and 1 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance WHEREAS, the City as lead agency and County as a project partner provided public comment opportunities through an EIS scoping period in October and November 2012, and for the Gorst Subarea Plan and Draft Planned Action EIS during June and July 2013, and held public meetings and hearings as part of a coordinated Gorst public participation program throughout 2013, and WHEREAS, the City provided legal notice of a community meeting on October 4, 2013 by emailing to all affected federally recognized tribal governments and agencies with ,jurisdiction over the future development anticipated for the planned action, in compliance with RCW 43 21 C 440, and WHEREAS, the City held a community meeting on October 15, 2013 in compliance with RCW 43 21C 440, and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2013 the City provided notification of a public hearing to be held on December 18, 2013 to all parties of record and all affected federally recognized tribal governments and agencies with jurisdiction over the future development for the Gorst Subarea Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on December 18, 2013, considered public comment and approved the Gorst Subarea Plan and functioning plans as Ordinance 5237, and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2014 the City provided legal notice in the Kitsap Sun of a public hearing to be held on February 19, 2014 for the planned action, and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2014 the City provided notification of a public hearing to be held on February 19, 2014 to all parties of record and all affected federally recognized tribal governments and agencies with jurisdiction over the future development anticipated for the planned action WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on February 19, 2014 and considered public comment, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION] Recitals The recitals set forth in this ordinance are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein SECTION 2 . Purpose The City Council declares that the purpose of this ordinance is to. A Combine environmental analysis, land use plans, development regulations, City codes and ordinances together with the mitigation measures in the Gorst Planned Action EIS to mitigate environmental impacts and process planned action development applications in the Planned Action Area, 2 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance B Designate the full Gorst UGA as a Planned Action Area for purposes of environmental review and permitting of subsequent, implementing projects pursuant to SEPA, RCW 43 21 C 440, C Determine that the EIS prepared for the Gorst Subarea Plan meets the requirements of a Planned Action EIS pursuant to SEPA, D Establish criteria and procedures, consistent with state law, that will determine whether subsequent projects within the Planned Action Area qualify as Planned Actions, E Provide the public with information about Planned Actions and how the City will process implementing projects within the Planned Action Area, F Streamline and expedite the land use permit review process by relying on the EIS completed for the Planned Action, and G Apply the City's development regulations together with the mitigation measures described in the EIS and this Ordinance to address the impacts of future development contemplated by this Ordinance SECTION 3 . Findings The City Council finds as follows A The City is subject to the requirements of the GMA (RCW 36 70A), and is applying the Planned Action to a UGA [Urban Growth Area], and B The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA, and is amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate a subarea element specific to the Gorst UGA, and C The City is adopting development regulations concurrent with the Gorst Subarea Plan to implement said Plan, including this ordinance, and D An EIS has been prepared for the Planned Action Area, and the City Council finds that the EIS adequately identifies and addresses the probable significant environmental impacts associated with the type and amount of development planned to occur in the designated Planned Action Area, and E The mitigation measures identified in the Gorst Planned Action EIS and attached to this ordinance as Exhibit B, incorporated herein by reference, together with adopted City development regulations, will adequately mitigate significant unpacts from development within the Planned Action Area, and F The Gorst Subarea Plan and Planned Action EIS identify the location, type and amount of development that is contemplated by the Planned Action, and G Future projects that are implemented consistent with the Planned Action will protect the environment, benefit the public and enhance economic development, and H The City and County provided several opportunities for meaningful public involvement in the Gorst Subarea Plan and Planned Action EIS, including a community meeting prior to the publication of notice for the planned action ordinance, have considered all comments received, and, as appropriate, have modified the proposal or mitigation measures in response to comments, I Essential public facilities defined in RCW 47 06 140 are excluded from the Planned Action and not eligible for review or permitting as Planned Actions unless they are accessory to or part of a project that otherwise qualifies as a planned action, and J The Planned Action applies to a defined area that is smaller than the overall City boundaries and smaller than overall County designated UGAs, and K. Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed Planned Action, with implementation of Subarea Plan and mitigation measures identified in the EIS 3 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance SECTION 4 Procedures and Cntena for Evaluating and Determining Planned Action Projects within Planned Action Area A Planned Action Area This Planned Action designation shall apply to the area shown in Exhibit A, incorporated herein by reference B Environmental Document A Planned Action determination for a site - specific project application within the Planned Action Area shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the Draft EIS issued by the City on June 10, 2013 and the Final EIS published on October 8, 2013 The Draft and Final EIS documents shall comprise the Planned Action EIS for the Planned Action Area The mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference, are based upon the findings of the Planned Action EIS and shall, along with adopted City regulations, provide the framework that the City will use to apply appropriate conditions on qualifying Planned Action projects within the Planned Action Area C Planned Action Desi ated Land uses and activities described in the Planned Action EIS, subject to the thresholds described in Subsection 4(D) of this Ordinance below ( "Planned Action Qualifications ") and the mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B, are designated Planned Actions or Planned Action Projects pursuant to RCW 43 21C 440 A development application for a site - specific Planned Action project located within Planned Action Area shall be designated a Planned Action if it completes the modified SEPA Checklist in Exhibit B and meets the criteria set forth in Subsection 4(D) of this Ordinance and all other applicable laws, codes, development regulations and standards of the City are met D Planned Action Qualifications The following thresholds shall be used to determine if a site - specific development proposed within the Planned Action Area was contemplated as a Planned Action and has had its environmental impacts evaluated in the Planned Action EIS (1) QualifVng Land Uses (a) Planned Action Categories The following general categories /types of land uses are defined the Gorst Subarea Plan and are considered Planned Actions i Mixed Use. Retail, hotel, office, services, and attached single family, cottages, townhomes, and apartments in horizontal or vertical patterns ii Single Family Subdivision and Multifamily Residential detached single family, attached single family, cottages, townhomes, apartments, and accessory dwelling units, in clustered and non - clustered patterns iii Commercial Regional, community, and neighborhood commercial uses including retail, hotel, office, and services iv Open Space, Recreation Active and passive parks, recreation, and open space facilities Secondary uses include accessory commercial such as concessions, recreation equipment rental, and other small -scale facilities (b) Planned Action Uses A land use shall be considered a Planned Action Land Use when i it is within the Planned Action Area as shown in Exhibit A, u it is withrri the one or more of the land use categories described in subsection 1(a) above, and ui it is listed in development regulations applicable to the zoning classifications applied to properties within the Planned Action Area A Planned Action may be a single Planned Action use or a combination of Planned Action uses together in a mixed use development Planned Action uses include accessory uses 4 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance (c) Public Services The following public services, infrastructure and utilities are also Planned Actions Multi -modal transportation improvements, water and sewer improvements, stormwater improvements, fish passage barrier removals, and habitat restoration proposals considered in capital plans associated with the Gorst Subarea Plan i Applicants for public services, infrastructure and utilities projects shall demonstrate consistency with the Gorst Creek Watershed Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, Bremerton Shoreline Master Program, and Bremerton Critical Areas Ordinance 11 Applicants for fish passage barrier removals and habitat restoration proposals shall demonstrate consultation with appropriate federally recognized tribes iii Essential public facilities defined in RCW 47 06 140 are excluded from the Planned Action and not eligible for review or permitting as Planned Actions unless they are accessory to or part of a project that otherwise qualifies as a planned action. (2) Development Thresholds (a) Land Use The following amounts of various new land uses are contemplated by the Planned Action Feature Planned Action Area Residential Dwellings (units) 585 Commercial Square Feet 156,639 (b) Shifting development amounts between land uses in Subsection 4(1))(2)(a) of this ordinance may be permitted when the total build -out is less than the aggregate amount of development reviewed in the EIS, the traffic trips for the preferred alternative are not exceeded, and, the development impacts identified in the Planned Action EIS and are mitigated consistent with Exhibit B (c) Further environmental review may be required pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 172, if any individual Planned Action or combination of Planned Actions exceed the development thresholds specified in this Ordinance and/or alter the assumptions and analysis in the Planned Action EIS (3) Transportation Thresholds (a) Trip Ranges & Thresholds. The number of daily vehicle and peak hour trips anticipated in the Planned Action Area and reviewed in the EIS is as follows Gorst Area Travel Statistics Category Daily Trips Peak Hour Trips Preferred Alternative — 2010 -2035 Trips 5,958 572 Note Based on Gorst area traffic analysis zones and the change in trips from 2010 -2035 Includes the No Action trips (4,114 daily and 395 peak hour), and the net increment of trips attributable to the Preferred Alternative (1,844 daily and 177 peak hour) beyond the No Action trips Source Kitsap County 2013 (b) Concurrency All Planned Actions shall meet the transportation Concurrency requirements and the level of service (LOS) thresholds established in the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 11.12 BMC Transportation Development Code (c) Traffic Impact and Mitigation 1 Applicants shall prepare traffic impact analysis consistent with BMC 11 12 060 Traffic Impact Analysis Reports and the following A Traffic impact analysis reports are required for proposed development projects when the City Engineer or his/her designee has reason to believe that the 5 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance impact on the City's existing or planned future transportation facilities will be significant "Significant," for this purpose, means generating, on any portion of the City transportation system, in excess of two percent (2 %) more traffic above the existing base line at either the peak period or for the average day where the base line shall be determined by the City Engineer or his/her designee The City Engineer or his/her designee may require the traffic study to include any elements determined necessary in order to evaluate the nature and extent of appropriate mitigation measures The report shall contain quantification of existing traffic, including existing LOS circulation, and parking plus that for the site after the proposed project is constructed The analysis shall consider traffic impacts during the peak period If the development generates significant traffic volumes outside the peak period of the adjacent road system, the City Engineer or his/her designee will determine the appropriate time interval of the analysis The report shall also propose means to mitigate the impacts of the project in accordance with BMC 11 12 060 Traffic Impact Analysis Reports The traffic impact analysis shall be prepared by a Washington Registered Professional Engineer who is qualified in traffic engineering B While access to the north via Sherman Heights Road does not provide the most direct route to Werner Avenue and SR 3, this corridor (including Sherman Heights Road, Kent Avenue, 3rd Avenue and Union Avenue) shall be evaluated for spot intersection improvements to make this route and attractive route for traffic originating in the Gorst UGA to head north to avoid having to access SR 3 in central Gorst C While Werner road is north of the Gorst UGA, this roadway is considered an important route for Gorst UGA traffic to access SR 3 The Werner Road corridor between Union Avenue and SR 3 shall be evaluated as part of traffic impact analysis reports prepared for new development in order to optimize the traffic flow on this corridor ii Traffic mitigation shall be provided consistent with BMC 11 12 070 and as follows A The City Engineer or his/her designee shall impose conditions necessary to mitigate all impacts of traffic, circulation and parking resulting from a project For segments, intersections or other portions of the street system for which a LOS standard has been adopted within the current comprehensive plan of the city, mitigation measures shall be sufficient, in the estimation of the City Engineer or his/her designee, to assure that such segments, intersections or other portions of the street system continue to meet or exceed the adopted LOS standards after full project occupancy and operation For segments, intersections or other portions of the street system for where the present LOS is below the standard that has been adopted in the current comprehensive plan, the mitigation measure shall be sufficient in the estimation of the City Engineer or his/her designee to maintain or exceed the present LOS Mitigation measures may include, but are not limited to, channehzation, intersection modifications, signal installation, modification, or replacement, installation of acceleration/deceleration lanes, turn lanes and medians B Required traffic mitigations related to LOS standard shall not require that an applicant mitigate portions of traffic not attributable to the project C The City Engineer or his/her designee may require the applicant to participate in the funding of mitigation measures required as a result of traffic impacts associated with development on the property in lieu of construction of the improvements if the City Engineer 1 or his/her designee determines that the delay in construction will not adversely impact the City Transportation System, and the best interests of the public would be better served by the delay 6 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance (d) Discretion The City Engineer or his/her designee or his/her designee shall have discretion to determine incremental and total trip generation, consistent with the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (latest edition) or an alternative manual accepted by the City Engineer at his or her sole discretion, for each protect permit application proposed under this Planned Action (4) Elements of the Environment and Degree of Impacts A proposed project that would result in a significant change in the type or degree of adverse impacts to any element(s) of the environment analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, would not qualify as a Planned Action (5) Changed Conditions Should environmental conditions change significantly from those analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official may determine that the Planned Action designation is no longer applicable until supplemental environmental review is conducted (6) Substantive Authority Pursuant to SEPA Substantive Authority at BMC 20 04 010 and Comprehensive Plan Policies, impacts shall be mitigated through the measures included in Exhibit B E Planned Action Review Criteria (1) The City's SEPA Responsible Official may designate as "planned actions ", pursuant to RCW 43 21C 030, applications that meet all of the following conditions (a) The proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit A of this ordinance, (b) The proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Planned Action EIS and "Planned Action Qualifications" set forth in Subsection 4(D) of this ordinance, (c) The proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of Subsection 4(D) of this ordinance, (d) The proposal is consistent with the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and the Gorst Subarea Plan, (e) The proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS, (f) The proposal's significant impacts have been mitigated by application of the measures identified in Exhibit B, and other applicable City regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required, (g) The proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and regulations, and the SEPA Responsible Official determines that these constitute adequate mitigation, and (h) The proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36 70A 200(1), unless the essential public facility is accessory to or part of a development that is designated as a planned action under this ordinance (2) The City shall base its decision on review of a Planned Action SEPA checklist (Exhibit C), or an alternative form approved by state law, and review of the application and supporting documentation (3) A proposal that meets the criteria of this section shall be considered to qualify and be designated as a planned action, consistent with the requirements of RCW 43 21C 030, WAC 197 -11 -164 et seq , and this ordinance F Effect of Planned Action (1) Designation as a Planned Action Protect by the SEPA Responsible Official means that a qualifying proposal has been reviewed in accordance with this Ordinance and found to be 7 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance consistent with the development parameters and thresholds established herein, and with the environmental analysis contained in the Planned Action EIS (2) Upon determination by the City's SEPA Responsible Official that the proposal meets the criteria of "Planned Action Qualifications" set forth in Subsection 4(D) of this ordinance and qualifies as a planned action, the proposal shall not require a SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to SEPA G Planned Action Permit Process Applications for planned actions shall be reviewed pursuant to the following process (1) Development applications shall meet all applicable requirements of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) Applications for planned actions shall be made on forms provided by the City and shall include the Planned Action SEPA checklist (Exhibit B) (2) The City's SEPA Responsible Official shall determine whether the application is complete as provided in BMC Chapter 20 02 (3) If the application is for a project within the Planned Action Area defined in Exhibit A, the application will be reviewed to determine if it is consistent with the criteria of this ordinance and thereby qualifies as a Planned Action project (a) The decision of the City's SEPA Responsible Official regarding qualification of a project as a Planned Action is a Type 1 decision The SEPA Responsible Official shall notify the applicant of his/her decision Notice of the determination on Type 1 decisions involving a planned action shall also be mailed or otherwise venfiably delivered to federally recognized tribal governments and to agencies with jurisdiction over the planned action project, pursuant to Chapter 1, Laws of 2012 (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill (ESSB) 6406) and RCW 43 21 C 440 (b) If the project is determined to qualify as a Planned Action, it shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedures specified in BMC Chapter 20 02, except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review shall be required (c) Notice of the application for a planned action project shall be consistent with Chapter 20 02 BMC (4) If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required by this ordinance See Subsection 4(G)(3)(a) regarding notice of the Type 1 decision (5) To provide additional certainty about applicable requirements, the City or applicant may request consideration and execution of a development agreement for a Planned Action project, consistent with RCW 36 70B 170 et seq (6) If a project is determined to not qualify as a Planned Action, the SEPA Responsible Official shall so notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure consistent with the City's SEPA regulations and the requirements of state law The notice shall describe the elements of the application that result in failure to qualify as a Planned Action (7) Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Actions may mcorporate or otherwise use relevant elements of the Planned Action EIS, as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA requirements The SEPA Responsible Official may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non - qualifying project to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Planned Action EIS SECTIONS Monitoring and Review A The City should monitor the progress of development in the designated Planned Action area as deemed appropriate to ensure that it is consistent with the assumptions of this 8 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance ordinance and the Planned Action EIS regarding the type and amount of development and associated impacts, and with the mitigation measures and improvements planned for the Planned Action Area B This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed by the SEPA Responsible Official no later than five years from its effective date. The review shall determine the continuing relevance of the Planned Action assumptions and findings with respect to environmental conditions in the Planned Action area, the impacts of development, and required mitigation measures The SEPA Responsible Official shall also consider the implementation of Public Agency Actions and Commitments in Exhibit C Based upon this review, the City may propose amendments to this ordinance and/or may supplement or revise the Planned Action EIS SECTION 6 . Con ict. In the event of a conflict between this Ordinance or any mitigation measures unposed thereto, and any Ordinance or regulation of the City, the provisions of this Ordinance shall control, except that the provision of any International Building Code shall supersede SECTION 7 . Severabih If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect SECTION 8 . Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law PASSED by the City Council the day of fib/''" hi/ , 2014 ' U/Lt ' GRE 7 9 2014 ELER, Council President Approved this f 7 day of 6- 0 - 61WA V PATTY LEN 7 ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM ON CORIN, City Clerk O R A LUBOVICH, Ci PUBLISHED the day of M6C 2014 EFFECTIVE the -- day of 1 2014 ORDINANCE NO �� -- 9 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance EXHIBIT A GORST UGA PLANNED ACTION AREA 1 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B GORST AERIAL UGA Boundary cl City Limits Parcels - GGergU CA rQ it Date April 2013 Source DigifalGlobc Kltsap County ASwwt 1011 BERK EXHIBIT B MODIFIED SEPA CHECKLIST AND PLANNED ACTION EIS MITIGATION MEASURES Including: • Attachment B -1— Mitigation Required For Development Applications • Attachment B -2 — Advisory Notes to Applicants: Applicable Regulations 1 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B GORST UGA PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCE Exhibit B: Example Environmental Checklist and Required Mitigation Document INTRODUCTION The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires environmental review for project and non - project proposals that are likely to have adverse impacts upon the environment In order to meet SEPA requirements, the City of Bremerton issued the Gorst Planned Action Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on June 10, 2013, and the Final EIS was issued on October 8, 2013 The Draft and the Final EIS together are referenced herein as the `EIS" The EIS has identified significant beneficial and adverse impacts that are anticipated to occur with the future development of the Planned Action Area, together with a number of possible measures to mitigate those significant adverse impacts On December 18, 2013, the City of Bremerton adopted Ordinance No 5240 establishing a planned action designation for the Gorst Urban Growth Area (UGA) studied as Planned Action in the EIS (see Exhibit A) SEPA Rules indicates review of a project proposed as a planned action is intended to be simpler and more focused than for other projects (WAC 197 -11 -172) In addition, SEPA allows an agency to utilize a modified checklist form that is designated within the planned action ordinance (see RCW 43 21 c 440) This Exhibit B provides a modified checklist form adopted in the Gorst Urban Growth Area (UGA) Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Document A Mitigation Document is provided in Attachment B -1, and also summarized in the environmental checklist Attachment B -1 establishes specific mitigation measures, based upon significant adverse impacts identified in the EIS The mitigation measures shall apply to future development proposals which are consistent with the Planned Action scenarios reviewed in the EIS, and which are located within the Gorst UGA Planned Action Area (see Exhibit A) Applicable Plans and Regulations The EIS identifies specific regulations that act as mitigation measures These are summarized in Attachment B -2 by EIS topic, and are advisory to applicants All applicable federal, state, and local regulations shall apply to Planned Actions, including the regulations that are adopted with the Preferred Alternative Planned Action applicants shall comply with all adopted regulations where applicable including those listed in the EIS and those not included in the EIS INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal The City of Bremerton will use this checklist to determine whether the project is consistent with the analysis in the Gorst Subarea Plan EIS and qualifies as a planned action, or would otherwise require additional environmental review under SEPA Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own project plans and the Gorst Planned Action EIS without the need to hire experts 2 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B A. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION Date Applicant Property Owner Property Address Street City, State, Zip Code Parcel Information Assessor Parcel Number Property Size in Acres Give a brief, complete description of your proposal Property Zoning District Name Building Type • Land Use ❑ Engineering • Building ❑ Other Permits Requested (list all that apply) All Applications Deemed Complete? Yes _ No _ Explain Are there pending governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Yes _ No Explain Existing Land Use Describe Existing Uses on the Site ❑ Mixed Use Retail, hotel, office, services, and attached single ❑ Commercial Regional, community, and neighborhood family, cottages, townhomes, and apartments in horizontal or commercial uses including retail, hotel, office, and Proposed Land Use — vertical patterns services Check and Circle All ❑ Single Family and Multifamily Residential detached single ❑ Open Space, Recreation Active and passive parks, That Apply family, attached single family, cottages, townhomes, recreation, and open space facilities Secondary uses apartments, and accessory dwelling units, in clustered and include accessory commercial such as concessions, non - clustered patterns recreation equipment rental, and other small -scale facilities # Existing Dwellings # Proposed Dwellings Units Proposed Density (du /ac) # Dwelling Type # Type Dwellings # Dwelling Type # Type Dwelling Threshold Total in Ordinance 585 Dwelling Bank Remainder as of 20_ dwellings Non - residential Uses Existing Proposed 3 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Acton Ordinance — Exhibit B Building Square Feet Employment Square Feet in Ordinance 156,639 Square Feet Remainder as of 20_ square feet Building Height Existing Stories Proposed Stories Existing Height in feet Proposed Height in feet Parking Spaces Existing Proposed Impervious Surfaces Existing Square Feet Proposed Square Feet Existing Estimated Trips Total Future Estimated Trips Total Net New Trips PM Peak Hour Weekday Vehicle Trips Source of Trip Rate ITE Manual _ Other Transportation Impacts Determined Consistent with BMC Chapter 1112 Transportation Development Code Yes No Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing) Describe plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to this proposal List any available or pending environmental information directly related to this proposal 4 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B B. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND MITIGATION MEASURES Geology /Soils Checklist and Mitigation Measures Geology /Soils Checklist and Mitigation Measures 1 Description of Conditions STAFF COMMENTS A General description of the site (circle one) Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other B What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? C What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? 2 Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed Indicate source of fill 3 Has any part of the site been classified as a "geologically hazardous" area? (Check all that apply) ❑ Landslide Hazards ❑ Erosion Hazards ❑ Seismic Hazards ❑ Liquefaction Hazards ❑ Other Describe 4 Proposed Measures to control impacts to earth, soils, and geologic hazardous areas including Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations 5 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Water Resources /Stormwater Checklist and Mitigation Measures Water Resources /Stormwater Checklist and Mitigation Measures 5 Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, STAFF COMMENTS saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type of surface water body, including their name(s), stream classification, and whether there is a 100 -year floodplain If appropriate, state what stream or river the surface water body flows into 6 Will the proposal require or result in (check all that apply and describe below) • any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? • fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands? ❑ surface water withdrawals or diversions? • discharges of waste materials to surface waters? • groundwater withdrawal or discharge? ❑ waste materials entering ground or surface waters? 7 Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection, treatment, and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe 8 Is the area designated a critical aquifer recharge area? If so, please describe 9 About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 10 What measures are proposed to reduce or control water resources /stormwater impacts? The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) • Compliance with construction- related stormwater requirements, including temporary erosion and sediment control, and development and implementation of a stormwater pollution and spill prevention plan • Determination of necessary permanent, long -term water quality treatment requirements • Low Impact Development (LID) techniques employed, consistent with BMC 15 04 020 and the Gorst Subarea Plan? ❑ Adequate erosion protection at outfalls Other 6 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B T Air Quality /Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Checklist and Mitigation Measures Air Quality /GHG Checklist and Mitigation Measures 11 What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal a) during construction and b) when the project is STAFF COMMENTS completed? Please describe and give quantities if known 12 What measures are proposed to reduce or control air emissions? The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications (check all that apply) ❑ Air Quality Control Plans ❑ Fugitive Dust Control Plan ❑ Haul Traffic Scheduled Off Peak ❑ No burning of slash or demolition debris ❑ GHG reduction measures use ❑ Other Explain Plants and Animals Checklist and Mitigation Measures Plants and Animals Checklist and Mitigation Measures 13 Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site STAFF COMMENTS ❑ Deciduous tree Alder, maple, aspen, other ❑ Evergreen tree Fir, cedar, pine, other ❑ Shrubs ❑ Grass ❑ Pasture ❑ Crop or grain ❑ Wet soil plants Cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ Water plants Water lily, eelgrass, milfo►I, other Other types of vegetation 14 Are there wetlands on the property? Please describe their acreage and classification 15 Is there riparian habitat on the property? 16 What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 17 List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site 18 Are there plants or habitats subject to Critical Areas and /or Shoreline Master Program? 7 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Plants and Animals Checklist and Mitigation Measures 19 Is the proposal consistent with critical area regulations, shoreline regulations, and requirements of the Gorst Subarea Plan? Please describe 20 Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, buffers, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Development application has considered wildlife corridors and connectivity ❑ Clearing of vegetation and construction activities are planned scheduled outside of breeding periods for sensitive bird species and migratory birds If not, rationale for not meeting scheduling requirements provided? Yes_ No_ ❑ Other Noise Checklist and Mitigation Measures Noise Checklist and Mitigation Measures 21 What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (example traffic, equipment, operation, other) STAFF COMMENTS 22 What types and levels of noise would be created by Or associated with the project on a short -term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation, other)? 23 What measures are proposed to reduce or control Noise? The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Demonstration that site planning and building design to reduce noise impacts has been considered for noise sensitive developments ❑ Noise barriers such as walls and earthen berms to mitigate noise from ground transportation, commercial and industrial sources ❑ Conditions to limit noise consistent with Mitigation Measure 15 of Attachment B -1 ❑ Construction noise control plan ❑ Other Hazardous Materials Checklist and Mitigation Measures Hazardous Materials Checklist and Mitigation Measures 24 Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or STAFF COMMENTS hazardous waste that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe 25 Describe special emergency services that might be required 26 What measures are proposed to reduce or control Hazardous Materials? 8 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Provision of hazardous materials awareness training to all grading and excavation crews • Provision of ccontmgency plan to identify, segregate, and dispose of hazardous waste in full accordance with the MTCA • Provision of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan • Provision of Spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plan • Identification of all ACM and lead -based paint in structures prior to demolition activities • Provision of additional studies to locate undocumented underground storage tanks and fuel lines before construction of specific development projects ❑ If property has been identified as having potential for contamination, site assessment has been conducted ❑ Other Land Use Checklist and Mitigation Measures Land Use Checklist and Mitigation Measures . 27 What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? STAFF COMMENTS 28 Describe any structures on the site Will any structures be demolished? If so, what type, dwelling units, square feet? 29 What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 30 What is the current zoning classification of the site? 31 If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? 32 What is the planned use of the site? List type of use, number of dwelling units and building square feet 33 Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, including and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations • Compliance with Gorst Subarea Plan • Compliance with other applicable land use and shoreline policies and development regulations ❑ Other 9 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Aesthetics Checklist and Mitigation Measures Aesthetics Checklist and Mitigation Measures 34 What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s)? STAFF COMMENTS 35 Would any views in the immediate vicinity be altered or obstructed? 36 Would the proposal produce light or glare? What time Of day would it mainly occur? 37 Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 38 What existing offsite sources Of light Or glare may affect your proposal? 39 Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic or light and glare impacts, including Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations ❑ Compliance with Gorst Subarea Plan ❑ Use of Incentives for Height including public benefits in exchange for increased height? ❑ Compliance with other applicable land use and shoreline policies and development regulations ❑ Other Cultural Resources Checklist and Mitigation Measures Cultural Resources Checklist and Mitigation Measures 40 Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on STAFF COMMENTS or next to the site? If so, generally describe ❑ Condition to stop construction if resources of historic or archeological 41 Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be significance are found on or next to the site ❑ Condition if human skeletal remains are encountered during construction, 42 Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to historic or cultural resources, if any the contractor /project proponent will The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for stop work and make appropriate Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) notifications ❑ Applicant in High or Moderate Probability Areas has prepared a cultural resource study ❑ Building is 45 years of age and is reviewed for eligibility for listing on state and national registers ❑ Other 10 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Transportation Checklist and Mitigation Measures Transportation Checklist and Mitigation Measures 43 Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show on STAFF COMMENTS site plans, if any 44 Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 45 How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 46 Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) 47 How many PM peak hour vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? 48 Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) • Evaluate and mitigate roadways consistent with Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 D(3)(c) • Evaluate and mitigate for impacts to West Belfair Valley Road consistent with Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan and Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 D(3)(c) • Project is designed to direct traffic either north (Sherman Heights) or west (Sam Christopherson Avenue or West Belfair Valley Road) of the SR 3/ SR 16 junction • The Werner Road corridor between Union Avenue and SR 3 has been evaluated as part of traffic impact analysis reports prepared for new development in order to optimize the traffic flow on this corridor • Other measures to reduce or control transportation impacts Public Services and Utilities Checklist and Mitigation Measures Public Services and Utilities Checklist 49 Water Supply Would the project result in an increased need for water supply or fire flow pressure? Can City levels of STAFF COMMENTS service be met? 50 Wastewater Would the project result in an increased need for wastewater services? Can City levels of service be met? 51 Police Protection Would the project increase demand for police services? Can City levels of service be met? 11 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Actton Ordinance — Exhibit B Public Services and Utilities Checklist 52 Fire and Emergency Services Would the project increase demand for fire and /or emergency services? Can levels of services be met? 53 Schools Would the project result in an increase in demand for school services? Can levels of services be met? Is an impact fee required? 54 Parks and Recreation Would the project require an increase in demand for parks and recreation? Can levels of services be met? 55 Other Public Services and Utilities Would the project require an increase in demand for other services and utilities? Can levels of services be met? 56 Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Capital Facility Plan has been considered, and development provides its fair share of the cost of improvements consistent with applicable local government plans and codes ❑ Law enforcement agency has been consulted, and development reflects applicable code requirements ❑ Fire protection agency has been consulted, and development complies with Uniform Fire Code ❑ School district has been consulted, and appropriate impact fee has been provided, if applicable ❑ Onsite park /recreation, or fee-in-lieu, or a park impact fee is required ❑ Power can adequately service proposed development based on consultation with service providers ❑ Proponents have verifiably determined location of utilities ❑ Proponents provide complete utility relocation or modification, where feasible, prior to project- specific construction ❑ Proponents have prepared Stormwater Management Plan consistent with local government codes and Gorst Subarea Plan ❑ Developer has coordinated with City to ensure that sewer lines will be extended to provide service to proposed development site ❑ Developer will co- locate telecommunications facilities to minimize aesthetic impacts ❑ Developer has planned for appropriate site landscaping to screen telecommunications equipment from surrounding properties and the public realm ❑ Other Measures to reduce or control public services and utilities impacts 12 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B C. APPLICANT SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision Signature Date 13 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B D. REVIEW CRITERIA Criteria Discussion (a) the proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit A of this Ordinance, (b) the proposed uses and densities are consistent with those described in the Gorst Planned Action EIS and Section 4 D of this Ordinance, (c) the proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of Section 4 D of this Ordinance, (d) the proposal is consistent with the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and the Gorst Subarea Plan, (e) the proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS, (f) the proposal's significant impacts have been mitigated by application of the measures identified in Exhibit B, and other applicable City regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required, (g) the proposal complies with all applicable local, state and /or federal laws and regulations, and the SEPA Responsible Official determines that these constitute adequate mitigation, (h) the proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36 70A 200(1), unless the essential public facility is accessory to or part of a development that is designated as a planned action under this ordinance 14 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Review Criteria The City's SEPA Responsible Official may designate "planned actions" consistent with criteria in Ordinance No 5240 Subsection 4 E Determination Criteria Applications for planned actions shall be reviewed pursuant to the process in Ordinance No 5240 Section 4 G Requirement Discussion Applications for planned actions were made on forms provided by the City including this Gorst UGA Environmental Checklist and Mitigation Document The application has been deemed complete in accordance with BMC Chapter 20 02 The proposal is located within Planned Action Area pursuant to Exhibit A of this Ordinance The proposed use(s) are listed in Section 4D of the Ordinance and qualify as a Planned Action 15 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B E. SEPA RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL DETERMINATION ! A. Qualifies as a Planned Action The application is consistent with the criteria of Ordinance 5240 and thereby qualifies as a Planned Action project It shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedures specified in 5240, except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review shall be required C Notice shall be made pursuant to BMC Chapter 20 02 as part of notice of the underlying permits and shall include the results of the Planned Action determination If notice l is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required See Section 4 G(3)(a) regarding notice of the Type 1 decision The review process for the underlying permit shall be as provided in BMC Chapter 20 02 NOTE If it is determined during subsequent detailed permit review that a project does not qualify as a planned action, this determination shall be amended Signature Date j B Does not Qualify as Planned Action The application is not consistent with the criteria of Ordinance 5240, and does not qualify as a Planned Action project for the following reasons Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Actions may incorporate or otherwise use relevant elements of the Planned Action EIS, as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA requirements The SEPA Responsible Official may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non - qualifying project to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Planned Action EIS SEPA Process Prescribed Signature Date 16 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT B -1 MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 17 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B ATTACHMENT B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications Note The following mitigation measures are taken from the Gorst Planned Action Final EIS The concepts are the same as the Final EIS but the description of the "potential mitigation measures" has been made more actionable or implementable, such as by specifying the responsible party or changing "should" to "shall' It also represents bringing in details from the Draft EIS where a discussion of mitigation measures was in some cases more extensive INTRODUCTION The City of Bremerton and Kitsap County issued the Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on June 10, 2013 and the Final EIS on October 8, 2013 The Draft and the Final EIS together are referenced herein as the "EIS" The EIS has identified significant beneficial and adverse impacts that are anticipated to occur with the future development of the Planned Action area, together with a number of possible measures to mitigate those significant adverse impacts Please see Final EIS Chapter 1 Summary for a description of impacts, mitigation measures, and significant unavoidable adverse impacts A Mitigation Document is provided in this Attachment B -1, and it establishes specific mitigation measures, based upon significant adverse impacts identified in the EIS The mitigation measures in this Attachment B -1 shall apply to future development proposals which are consistent with the Planned Action scenarios reviewed in the EIS, and which are located within the Gorst Planned Action Area (see Exhibit A) Where a mitigation measure includes the words "shall' or "will," inclusion of that measure in project plans is mandatory in order to qualify a project as a Planned Action Where "should" or "would" appear, the mitigation measure may be considered by the project applicant as a source of additional mitigation, as feasible or necessary, to ensure that a project qualifies as a Planned Action Unless stated specifically otherwise, the mitigation measures that require preparation of plans, conduct of studies, construction of improvements, conduct of maintenance activities, etc, are the responsibility of the applicant or designee to fund and /or perform MITIGATION MEASURES Geology /Soils No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Water Resources /Stormwater 1 All applicants for construction shall comply with all construction- related stormwater requirements, including temporary erosion and sediment control, and development and implementation of a stormwater pollution and spill prevention plan 2 For all proposed projects, applicants shall prepare a stormwater analysis consistent with BMC 15 04 020 and the Gorst Subarea Plan and based on City conditions, implement to the satisfaction of the City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee the permanent, long -term water quality treatment requirements, necessary for all vehicle - accessible areas and redevelopments Large areas of landscaping or lawn, unless strict policies on pesticide and fertilizer use are adopted, shall also be subject to water quality treatment requirements 3 Water quality treatment shall consist of Low Impact Development (LID) systems or techniques, consistent with BMC 15 04 020 and the Gorst Subarea Plan, unless it can be demonstrated that such techniques are not feasible Applicants should consider the Best Management Practices modeled in the "Technical Memorandum HSPF Hydrologic Modeling and SUSTAIN Stormwater Modeling of the Gorst Creek Watershed," available for review at the Bremerton Community Development Department 4 Additional erosion protection improvements may be required by the City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee at project outfalls because of increased peak runoff rates caused by an increase in impervious surface 18 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B Air Quality Construction Emission Control 5 The City of Bremerton shall require all construction contractors implement air quality control plans for construction activities in the Gorst Planned Action Area (see Exhibit A) The City of Bremerton shall require all future developers to prepare a dust control plan that commits the construction crews to implement all reasonable control measures described in the Associated General Contractors of Washington's Guide to Handling Fugitive Dust from Construction Projects The air quality control plans shall include best management practices (BMPs) to control fugitive dust and odors emitted by diesel construction equipment 6 BMPs shall be used to control fugitive dust consistent with the air quality control plan required above Example measure may include, but are not limited to • Use water sprays or other non -toxic dust control methods on unpaved roadways • Minimize vehicle speed while traveling on unpaved surfaces • Prevent track -out of mud onto public streets • Cover soil piles when practical • Minimize work during periods of high winds when practical The following mitigation measures should be used to minimize air quality and odor issues caused by tailpipe emissions • Maintain the engines of construction equipment according to manufacturers' specifications • Minimize idling of equipment while the equipment is not in use 7 If there is heavy traffic during some periods of the day, applicants shall schedule haul traffic during off -peak times in order to have the least effect on traffic and to minimize indirect increases in traffic related emissions 8 Burning of slash or demolition debris will not be permitted without express approval from the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency GHG Reduction Measures 9 Table B 1 -1 Potential GHG Reduction Mitigation Measures lists a variety of mitigation measures that could reduce GHG emissions caused by transportation facilities, building construction, space heating, and electricity usage (Ecology 2008) The table lists potential GHG reduction measures and indicates where the emission reductions might occur The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee)shall require development applicants to consider the reduction measures shown in in Table B 1 -1 Potential GHG Reduction Mitigation Measures for their projects and identify which measures are feasible and incorporated into their projects, and which measures are infeasible together with a rationale and explanation The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development applications to incorporate GHG reduction measures found to be feasible Table 13.1 -1 Potential Greenhouse Gas Reduction Mitigation Measures Reduction Measures Comments Site Design Retain and enhance vegetated open spaces Retains or increases sequestration by plants Plant trees and vegetation near structures to shade Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and _ buildings purchased electricity, and enhances carbon sinks Minimize building footprint Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and purchased electricity consumption, materials used, maintenance, land disturbance, and direct construction emissions Design water efficient landscaping Minimizes water consumption, purchased energy, and upstream emissions from water management Minimize energy use through building orientation Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and _ purchased electricity consumption Building Design and Operations W - -- _ _ Apply LEED standards (or equivalent) for design and Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and off - operations site /indirect purchased electricity, water use, waste disposal 19 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance —Exhibit B Reduction Measures Comments Purchase Energy Star equipment and appliances for public Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and agency use purchased electricity consumption Incorporate on -site renewable energy production, including Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and installation of photovoltaic cells or other solar options purchased electricity consumption Design street lights to use energy - efficient bulbs and Reduces purchased electricity fixtures _ Construct "green roofs" and use high - albedo roofing Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and materials purchased electricity consumption Install high - efficiency HVAC systems Minimizes fuel combustion and purchased electricity consumption Eliminate or reduce use of refrigerants in HVAC systems Reduces fugitive emissions Compare refrigerant usage before /after to determine GHG reduction Maximize interior day lighting through floor plates, Increases natural /day lighting initiatives and reduces increased building perimeter and use of skylights, purchased electrical energy consumption clerestories, and light wells Incorporate energy efficiency technology such as super Reduces fuel combustion and purchased electricity insulation motion sensors for lighting and climate- control- consumption efficient, directed exterior lighting Use water - conserving fixtures that surpass building code Reduces water consumption requirements Reuse gray water and /or collect and reuse rainwater Reduces water consumption with its indirect upstream electricity requirements Use recycled building materials and products Reduces extraction of purchased materials, possibly reduces transportation of materials, encourages recycling and reduction of solid waste disposal Use building materials that are extracted and /or Reduces transportation of purchased materials manufactured within the region Use rapidly renewable budding materials Reduces emissions from extraction of purchased materials Conduct third -party building commissioning to ensure Reduces fuel combustion and purchased electricity energy performance consumption Track energy performance of budding and develop strategy Reduces fuel combustion and purchased electricity to maintain efficiency_ consumption Transportation — Size parking capacity to not exceed local parking Reduced parking discourages auto - dependent travel, requirements and, where possible, seek reductions in encouraging alternative modes such as transit, walking, parking supply through special permits or waivers or Gorst- and biking Reduces direct and indirect VMT specific parking standards or incentives Develop and implement a marketing/information program Reduces direct and indirect VMT that includes posting and distribution of ridesharing/transit information Subsidize transit passes Reduce employee trips during Reduces employee VMT peak periods through alternative work schedules, telecommuting, and /or flex time Provide a guaranteed - ride -home program _ Provide bicycle storage and showers /changing rooms Reduces employee VMT Use traffic signalization and coordination to improve traffic Reduces transportation emissions and VMT flow and support pedestrian and bicycle safety Apply advanced technology systems and management Reduces emissions from transportation by minimizing strategies to improve operational efficiency of local streets idling and maximizing transportation routes /systems for _fuel efficiency 20 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Reduction Measures Comments Develop shuttle systems around business district parking Reduces idling fuel emissions and direct and indirect garages to reduce congestion and create shorter VMT commutes LEED = Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, HVAC = heating, ventilation, and air - conditioning 10 In addition, other vehicle trip reduction measures and land- use - related GHG reduction measures have been published by various air quality agencies For example, Table B 1 -2 SMAQMD' Recommended Measures for Land Use Emission Reductions lists the emission reduction measures developed by SMAQMD, 2010 The table lists SMAQMD's estimated "mitigation points" value, where each point value corresponds to the percent reduction in emissions For example, a mitigation point value of 10 corresponds to a one percent reduction in land- use - related emissions SMAQMD developed this table to quantify reductions in criteria pollutant emissions, but the listed measures would also generally reduce GHG emissions The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee shall require development applicants to consider the reduction measures shown in in Table B 1 -2 SMAQMD Recommended Measures for Land Use Emission Reductions for their projects and identify which measures are feasible and incorporated into their projects, and which measures are infeasible together with a rationale and explanation The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development applications to incorporate GHG emission reduction measures found to be feasible Table B 1 -2 SMAQMD Recommended Measures for Land Use Emission Reductions Measure Mitigation Number Title Description Points Bicycle /Pedes /Transit Measures 1 Bike parking Non - residential projects provide plentiful short -term and long -term 0 625 bicycle parking facilities to meet peak season maximum demand 2 End of trip facilities Non - residential projects provide "end -of- trip" facilities including 0 625 showers, lockers, and changing space 3 Bike parking at Long -term bicycle parking is provided at apartment complexes or 0 625 multiunit condominiums without garages _ re sidential 4 Proximity to bike Entire project is located within 1/2 mile of an existing designated 0 625 path /bike lanes bike lane and project design includes a comparable network that connects the project uses to the existing offsite f 5 Pedestrian network The project provides a pedestrian access network that internally V 10 links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site 6 Pedestrian barriers Site design and building placement minimize barriers to pedestrian 10 minimized access and interconnectivity Physical barriers such as walls, berms, landscaping, and slopes between residential and non - residential uses that impede bicycle or pedestrian circulation are eliminated 7 Bus shelter for Bus service provides headways of one hour or less for stops within 0 25 -1 0 existing transit 1/4 mile, project provides safe and convenient bicycle /pedestrian service access to transit stop(s) and provides essential transit stop improvements (i e , shelters, route information, benches, and light _ 8 Bus shelter for Project provides transit stops with safe and convenient 025 planned transit bicycle /pedestrian access Project provides essential transit stop service improvements (i e , shelters, route information, benches, and lighting) in anticipation of future transit service ' Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District 21 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance -Exhibit B Measure Mitigation Number Title Description Points 9 Traffic calming Project design includes pedestrian /bicycle safety and traffic calming 025-10 measures in excess of jurisdiction requirements Roadways are designed to reduce motor vehicle speeds and encourage pedestrian and bicycle trips by featuring traffic calming features Parking Measures 10a Paid parking Employee and /or customer paid parking system _ 10-72 10b Parking cash out Employer provides employees with a choice of forgoing subsidized 0 6 -4 5 parking for a cash payment equivalent to the cost of the parking space to the employer 11 Minimum parking Provide minimum amount of parking required Special review of 0 1 -6 0 parking required 12 Parking reduction Provide parking reduction less than code Special review of parking 01-12 beyond code required Recommend a Shared Parking strategy 13 Pedestrian Provide a parking lot design that includes clearly marked and shaded 05 pathway through pedestrian pathways between transit facilities and building parking entrances 14 Off street parking Parking facilities are not adjacent to street frontage 0 1 -1 5 Site Design Measures 15 Office /Mixed -use Project provides high density office or mixed -use proximate to 0 1 -2 0 density transit 16 Orientation to Project is oriented towards existing transit, bicycle, or pedestrian 05 existing transit, corridor Setback distance is minimized bikeway, or _ pedestrian corridor 17 Orientation toward Project is oriented towards planned transit, bicycle, or pedestrian 025 planned transit, corridor Setback distance is minimized bikeway, or pedestria co rridor _ 18 Residential density Project provides high - density residential development 10 -12 19 Street grid Multiple and direct street routing (grid style) 10 20 Neighborhood Make physical development consistent with requirements for 0 5 -1 5 electric vehicle neighborhood electric vehicles access 21 Affordable housing Residential development projects of 5 or more dwelling units 0 6 -4 0 component provide a deed - restricted low- income housing component on -site Mixed -use Measures 22 Urban mixed -use Development of projects predominantly characterized by properties 3 0 -9 0 on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design 22 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Measure Mitigation Number Title Description Points 23 Suburban mixed- Have at least three of the following on site and /or offsite within % 30 use mile Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office 24 Other mixed -use All residential units are within X mile of parks, schools or other civic 10 uses Budding Component Measures 25 No fireplace Project does not feature fireplaces or wood burning stoves 10 27 Energy Star roof Install Energy Star labeled roof materials 05-10 28 Ons►te renewable Project provides onsite renewable energy system(s) 10-30 energy system 30 Solar orientation Orient 75 or more percent of homes and /or buildings to face either 05 north or south (within 30 degrees of N /S) 31 Non -roof surfaces Provide shade (within 5 years) and /or use light- colored /high - albedo 10 materials (reflectance of at least 0 3) and /or open grid pavement for at least 30 percent of the site's non -roof impervious surfaces, including parking lots, walkways, plazas, etc , OR place a minimum of 50 percent of parking spaces underground or covered by structured parking, OR use an open -grid pavement system (less than 50 percent impervious) for a minimum of 50 percent of the parking lot area Unshaded parking lot areas, driveways, fire lanes, and other paved areas have a_mmimum albedo of 3 or greater 32 Green roof Install a vegetated roof that covers at least 50 percent of roof area 05 TDM and Miscellaneous Measures 33 Transportation Include permanent TMA membership and funding requirement so Management Funding to be provided by Community Facilities District or other Association non - revocable funding mechanism member_shi_p_ _ 34 Electric Provide a complimentary electric lawnmower to each residential 10 lawnmower buyer 99 Other Other proposed strategies, in consultation with project lead agency To Be Determined Plants and Animals 11 The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development applications to consider wildlife corridors and connectivity when designing and permitting new developments within the Gorst Creek Watershed 12 All clearing of vegetation and construction activities shall be limited to times outside the breeding period for sensitive bird species and migratory birds, unless an applicant can demonstrate mitigation measures to avoid or minimize impacts 23 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Acton Ordinance — Exhibit B Noise 13 All development proposals in the Gorst UGA shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee that proper site planning to reduce noise impacts has been considered for noise sensitive developmentS Measures may include but are not limited to • Increasing the distance from the noise source to sensitive receptors by creation of setbacks, • Placing non -noise sensitive uses such as parking lots and utility areas between the noise source and receiver, and • Orienting usable outdoor living space such as balconies, patios, and child play areas away from roadways • Orienting the budding to place activities that are more noise tolerant to face the roadway or other noise source, and • Limiting the number and size, and properly locating doors and windows to benefit interior noise control 14 The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development proposals to provide noise barriers such as walls and earthen berms to mitigate noise from ground transportation, commercial and industrial sources Noise barriers can be used to reduce the noise level both outdoors and indoors 15 The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development proposals to achieve the following • Provide hourly and maximum property line noise level limits for all mayor zoning districts defined in the Zoning Ordinance • Limit the hours of deliveries to commercial, mixed use, and industrial uses adjacent to residential and other noise sensitive land uses • Limit the hours of operation for commercial and retail to limit noise intrusion into nearby residential and other noise sensitive land uses • Limit noise levels generated by commercial and industrial uses • Limit outdoor industrial activities or operations to control excessive noise at adjacent residential properties • Limit the hours of operation of high noise - generating industrial equipment • Limit the hours of operation for refuse vehicles and parking lot sweepers if their activity results in an excessive noise level that adversely affects adjacent residential uses • Require the placement of loading and unloading areas so that commercial buildings shield nearby residential land uses from noise generated by loading dock and delivery activities If necessary, additional sound barriers shall be constructed on the commercial sites to protect nearby noise sensitive uses • Require the placement of all commercial HVAC machinery to be placed within mechanical equipment rooms wherever possible (Equipment manufacturer's specifications for venting and access to outside air shall be maintained ) • Require the provision of localized noise barriers or rooftop parapets around heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), cooling towers, and mechanical equipment so that line -of -sight to the noise source from the property line of the noise sensitive receptors is blocked (Equipment manufacturer's specifications for venting and access to outside air shall be maintained ) 16 All contractors shall prepare a noise control plan and implement the following measures during construction activities • Construction equipment shall be properly maintained per manufacturers' specifications and fitted with the best available noise suppression devices (e g, mufflers, silencers, wraps) Z As described in the Gorst Planned Action Draft EIS, noise sensitive receivers are generally considered humans engaged in activities or utilizing land uses that may be subject to the stress of significant interference from noise Activities usually associated with sensitive receptors include, but are not limited to, talking, reading, and sleeping Land uses often associated with sensitive receptors include residential dwellings, mobile homes, hotels, motels, hospitals, nursing homes, education facilities, libraries, and churches Parks and open space are also sometimes considered to be noise sensitive land uses Generally, outdoor areas of frequent human use are considered to be noise sensitive Industrial and commercial land uses are generally not considered sensitive to noise 24 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B • Construction operations and related activities associated with the project shall comply with the operational hours outlined in the City of Bremerton Noise Ordinance • Construction equipment shall not be idled for extended periods of time in the vicinity of noise sensitive receptors • Fixed and /or stationary construction equipment shall be located as far as possible from noise sensitive receptors (e g, generators, compressors, rock crushers, cement mixers) • All impact tools shall be shrouded or shielded, and all intake and exhaust ports on powered construction equipment shall be muffled or shielded 17 Where feasible, temporary barriers shall be placed as close to the noise source or as close to the receptor as possible and break the line of sight between the source and receptor where modeled levels exceed applicable standards 18 The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may consult Draft EIS Section 3 5 Noise for additional detail and guidance on the application of noise mitigation measures Hazardous Materials 19 Since encountering unreported spills or unreported underground fuel tanks is a risk when performing construction, Contractors shall be required to provide hazardous materials awareness training to all grading and excavation crews on how to identify any suspected contaminated soil or groundwater, and how to alert supervisors in the event of suspected contaminated material Signs of potential contaminated soil include stained sod, odors, oily sheen, or the presence of debris 20 Contractors shall be required to implement a contingency plan to identify, segregate, and dispose of hazardous waste in full accordance with the MTCA 21 Contractors shall be required to develop and implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, BMPs, and other permit conditions to minimize the potential for a release of hazardous materials to soil, groundwater, or surface water during construction 22 Contractors shall be required to follow careful construction practices to protect against hazardous materials spills from routine equipment operation during construction, prepare and maintain a current spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plan, and have an individual on site designated as an emergency coordinator, and understand and use proper hazardous materials storage and handling procedures and emergency procedures, including proper spill notification and response requirements 23 Contractors shall be required to identify all ACM and lead -based paint in structures prior to demolition activities in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35 If ACM or lead -based paint is identified, appropriately trained and licensed personnel shall contain, remove, and properly dispose of the ACM and /or lead based paint material according to federal and state regulations prior to demolition of the affected area 24 If warranted, contractors shall be required to conduct additional studies to locate undocumented USTs and fuel lines before construction of specific development projects (areas of concern include current and former commercial and residential structures) and will permanently decommission and properly remove USTs from project sites before commencing general construction activities 25 All applicants for development on properties identified as having potential for contamination shall conduct a thorough site assessment If contamination is discovered, the applicant shall be required to comply with all state and federal regulations for contaminated sites Land Use Patterns, Aesthetics, and Socio- Economics 26 Development proposals shall comply with the Gorst Subarea Plan development and design regulations that address • Allowed and prohibited uses /development types • Minimum and maximum density • Budding height • Building setbacks • Maximum lot coverage • Maximum impervious area • Critical area buffers • Streetscape guidelines • Site planning guidelines 25 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B • Design of the roadway, including width of travel, bicycle, and parking lanes • Design of the curb zone, which includes street trees and other amenities and infrastructure • The sidewalk • The transitional zone, which is the area between the sidewalk and edge of right -of -way • Building frontage elements such as the provision of weather protection where buildings abut the right -of -way • Building orientation, including the location of entrances • Building fagade, including street - facing windows, building articulation, and blank wall limitations • Parking and vehicular access, including location of parking, curb cuts, shared parking, and pedestrian accessibility Cultural Resources 27 A cultural resources study shall be conducted at the applicant's expense for specific projects within High Probability Areas (See Figure B 1 -1 and Table B 1 -3 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures) to determine if archaeological sites, traditional cultural properties (TCPs), or historic built environment resources are present that may be significant This should include but is not limited to background research, consultation with appropriate Tribes and interested parties, field study, and reporting A desktop review of existing background information regarding cultural resources shall be conducted at a minimum for projects within Moderate Probability Areas to determine if resources older than 50 years are present requiring evaluation and /or additional field studies See Figure B 1 -1 and Table B 1 -3 Table 3 10 -6 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures identifies the potential mitigation measures for significant cultural resources and when they should be completed Table B 1 -3 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures identifies the potential mitigation measures for significant cultural resources and when they should be completed 26 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B Figure B.1 -1 Gorst Creek Watershed: Cultural Resources Probability A E A j f t t _ c d t I "� � r I LlatrOnba �Rearvrtr �'' * s q � r t} 0 Q C9 M Bremerton West UGA , i �r , j' © g a r er t ..t 159 e U q` M s '� �" / C> 4� Gorst U r Shwi lr 166_ .p 16 16 m © b ! i` 4 �' � Port Orchard U a � C m Monm.m , 3 r � if — Cottan° t� � � _1 Bremerba 1 1 f ° ULID6 F er SKIAUGA `ULID6 = ! 5 SKIA UGA SKIA UGA'' ULID6 Bremerton � (,�, G f�f Airport Alrpnn f Legend s High Probability Area — Road r R Moderate Probability Area t— Railroad a _ _ t. W Urban Growth Area Stream a City Bremerton Wetland (WDFWJNWI) s City of Port Orchard Waterbody a b G c w (® Oa. May 2013 5 1 Mlles Source Suquam,sh Tribe Department of Ecology Department of Fish & Wildlife BERK Table 6.1 -3 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures 27 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B Mitigation Measure Description Timing A For future projects that are qualified as planned actions and that involve, Prior to Construction development, ground disturbance, and /or construction in the Study Area in areas shown as high or moderate probability on the predictive model map in Figure B 1 -1 Gorst Creek Watershed Cultural Resources Probability, the City of Bremerton shall determine if cultural resources are located in the specific project area (at the applicant's expense) This should consist of background research, a field visit (particularly for High Probability Areas), and consultation with the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) and the Tribes to determine if cultural resources (sites, buildings, TCPs) are located within the project area The following provides guidance for qualified planned action activities requiring land use, construction, or building permits from the City of Bremerton and located within high or moderate probability areas i Areas with prior negative archaeological survey, no ground disturbance, or in 100 percent culturally - sterile fill 1) document reason no survey is required, 2) require no further review n For all ground - disturbing projects not addressed in "i" above 1) consult statewide predictive model and tribal predictive model, 2) provide tribal notification, 3) if no known cultural resources are present, condition permit with standard inadvertent discovery language, 4) if known cultural resources are present, provide state and tribal notification, conduct survey, 5) In the event that a proposed project would disturb an archaeological resource, the responsible local government shall impose any and all measures to avoid or substantially lessen the impact, 6) if avoidance of the archaeological resource is not possible, an appropriate research design /treatment program must be designed and implemented with data recovery to occur prior to project related ground disturbance, 7) the avoidance of archaeological resources through selected of project alternatives and changes in design to avoid the archaeological resource would eliminate the need for measuring or mitigating impacts B In the event that a proposed development location within the Planned Prior to Construction Action Area (Exhibit A) contains a building or structure at least 45 years of age that is not listed in the WHR or the NRHP, the project shall be required by the City of Bremerton to undergo a review at the applicant's expense to determine if the building /structure is considered eligible for listing on the State or National Registers If impacts cannot be avoided on a historic resource that is determined eligible for listing on either state or national historic registers, the responsible local government is required to consult with DAHP about mitigation options C If human skeletal remains are encountered during construction, the During Construction contractor /project proponent will stop work and the Kitsap County Sheriff, DAHP, and the necessary Tribes will be contacted immediately D If archaeological resources are encountered during construction, work During Construction must stop until state and tribal notifications are made and until a qualified archaeologist can assess the discovery and implement mitigation if necessary Transportation 28 West Belfair Valley Road is projected to be operationally deficient prior to 2035 This roadway was identified in the 2012 Kitsap County UGA Remand SEIS and 2012 Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan as needing widening from 2 to 4 lanes All of the other County roadways within the Gorst Subarea have capacity to support the additional traffic associated with all three alternatives Planned Actions shall mitigate for their impact to this facility consistent with Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 D(3)(c) 28 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B 29 Due to the lack of capacity on SR 3 and SR 16 within the center of Gorst as well as a variety of merging and diverging movements, All new developments or redevelopments shall be designed to direct traffic either north (Sherman Heights) or west (Sam Christopherson Avenue or West Belfair Valley Road) of the SR 3/ SR 16 function Planned Actions shall mitigate for their impact to this facility consistent with Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 D(3)(c) 30 To address increased pedestrian demand between the proposed residential areas and the waterfront commercial and recreational land uses, consideration shall be made by development applicants to construct grade- separated pedestrian overpasses that would connect the residential and walkable commercial areas that are on both sides of SR 3 and SR 16 The exact location(s) of these overpasses need to be determined in conjunction with any proposed highway improvements in this area Planned Actions shall mitigate for their impact nonmotonzed modes consistent with Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 D(3)(c) Fire Protection and EMS No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Law Enforcement No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Schools No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Parks, Recreation, and Open Space 31 The City shall require that master planned developments within the Gorst UGA provide parks and /or open space as part of the development in order to serve the residents of that development and offset the need for the City to acquire and develop additional facilities Libraries No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Power 32 Applicants shall consult with Puget Sound Energy and Cascade Natural Gas and provide evidence of their consultation with Puget Sound Energy and Cascade Natural Gas As development permits are issued for future development in the Gorst UGA, the City of Bremerton, Puget Sound Energy and Cascade Natural Gas shall be advised by the responsible local government of large development or redevelopment projects and allowed to provide input on their ability to adequately serve the project Solid Waste No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater 33 Proponents of development shall evaluate the effect of proposed utility relocations on other nearby utility infrastructure 34 Proponents of development shall determine the exact location and depth of utilities and work with individual utility providers to verify the location 35 Proponents of development in coordination with utility provides shall complete utility relocation or modification, where feasible, prior to project- specific construction to reduce operational risks and reduce any potential disruption of service 36 The City of Bremerton shall require that sewer lines are extended to provide service to remaining areas unsuitable for onsite septic service treatment, and shall require development applicants in the Gorst UGA to ensure adequate sewer service consistent with BCC Chapter 15 03 Telecommunications 37 Developers shall be required to co- locate telecommunications facilities wherever appropriate and underground infrastructure to minimize aesthetic impacts 38 Developers shall be required to use appropriate site landscaping to screen telecommunications equipment from surrounding properties and the public realm 29 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Relationship to Plans and Policies No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments 30 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT B -2 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANTS: APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 31 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B ATTACHMENT B -2 Advisory Notes to Applicants: Applicable Regulations The Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) identifies specific regulations that act as mitigation measures These are summarized in Table B 2 -1 by EIS topic All applicable federal, state, and local regulations shall apply to Planned Actions Planned Action applicants shall comply with all adopted regulations where applicable including those listed in the EIS and those not included in the EIS Table B.2 -1. Summary of Applicable Regulations Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment 3 1 Geology /Soils • City of Bremerton Critical Area Ordinance • BMC Chapter 15, Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW) and LID Guidance Manual a International Building Code as adopted by City of Bremerton 3 2 Water Resources • Surface water quality standards are implemented through the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 certifications, water quality modifications, and compliance with the standards in Chapter 90 48 RCW and WAC 173 -201A • Applications for water quality related permits include the Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (DARPA) process, and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits In addition there are shoreline and critical area regulations applied by the City and County • As a result of the National Marine Fisheries Services' (2008) biological opinion regarding Federal Emergency Management Agency flood management, future development in the 100 -year floodplain of study area streams, such as Gorst Creek, will require avoidance or mitigation to address loss of habitat function associated with that development 3 3 Air Quality • National Ambient Air Quality Standards EPA establishes National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and specifies future dates for states to develop and implement plans to achieve these standards • State Ambient Air Quality Standards The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) establishes state ambient air quality standards for the same six pollutants that are at least as stringent as the national standards, in the case of S02, state standards are more stringent Draft EIS Table 3 3 -1 Notional and Washington State Ambient Air Quality Standards lists the state ambient air quality standards for six criteria pollutants • Outdoor Burning Puget Sound Clean Air Agency State Outdoor Burning Regulations per Washington Clean Air Act at Chapter 70 94 743 RCW 0 Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( PSCAA) Regulations All construction sites in the Puget Sound region are required to implement rigorous emission controls to minimize fugitive dust and odors during construction, as required by PSCAA Regulation 1, Section 9 15, Fugitive Dust Control Measures All industrial and commercial air pollutant sources in the Puget Sound region are required to register with PSCAA Facilities with substantial emissions are required to obtain a Notice of Construction air quality permit before construction is allowed to begin 0 State of Washington Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Laws Washington enacted a new law establishing GHG reduction limits • City of Bremerton SKIA Subarea Plan A subarea plan for SKIA was adopted in 2012 A portion of the Gorst Watershed is located within the SKIA subarea The SKIA subarea plan contains development incentives and requirements to ensure sustainable development and reduce GHG emissions 32 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment 3 4 Plant and Animals • City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Environment Chapter • City of Bremerton Critical Area Ordinance • City of Bremerton Shoreline Master Program • Federal Regulations Multiple federal regulations that pertain to the protection of plants and animals and their habitat include the Endangered Species Act, CWA, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act 3 5 Noise • BMC Chapter 6 32 (Noise Levels) establishes limits on noise levels and durations of noise crossing property boundaries with the City of Bremerton • The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Criteria The FHWA has adopted criteria for evaluating noise impacts associated with federally funded highway projects, and for determining whether such impacts are sufficient to justify funding of noise abatement These criteria are specified in the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR 772), Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise The Washington State Department of Transportation ( WSDOT) has adopted the FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria for evaluating noise impacts and determining whether such impacts are sufficient to justify funding of noise abatement for roadway improvement projects with state funding Any roadway improvements that would occur within the study area that would use state or federal funding would be subject to State and /or FHWA policies and procedures for evaluating traffic noise impacts and noise abatement In cases where no state or federal funding is involved, the WSDOT and FHWA protocols are not applicable 3 6 Hazardous Materials • Federal Laws and Regulations Federal hazardous material and waste laws and regulations would be applicable to hazardous substances used, stored, or generated by the project These include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (aka Superfund), and Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act Pursuant to regulations promulgated under Section 102 of CERCLA, as amended, release of a reportable quantity of a hazardous substance to the environment in a 24 -hour period must be reported to the National Response Center (40 CFR Part 302) • Washington State Hazardous Material and Waste Laws and Regulations These would be applicable to hazardous substances used, stored, and generated by the project The Model Toxics Control Act requires reporting of a release of any hazardous substance within 90 days of the release (or within 24 hours for releases from an underground storage tank [UST], WAC 173 - 340 -300) Cleanup activities at contaminated sites are conducted under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) and disposal of contaminated materials are conducted under RCRA • Washington Department of Safety and Health Asbestos Standards Demolition of older facilities may require asbestos and lead -based paint mitigation Under the Washington State Department of Safety and Health asbestos standards (WAC 296- 62, 296 -65, and 296 -155), thermal system insulation (pipe lagging, boiler insulation, etc ), surfacing materials (spray -on acoustical plasters, troweled on plaster coatings, etc ) and flooring materials (vinyl tile, sheet goods, etc ) are all presumed to contain asbestos in buildings built before 1981 unless these materials are shown not to contain asbestos by a certified contractor Demolition of asbestos in the project area is regulated by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (Article 4 Asbestos Control Standards) and requires an asbestos survey, a notification of demolition, verification that all asbestos was properly removed, and proper disposal of the asbestos - containing materials • Washington State Department of Commerce The Washington State Department of Commerce (WAC 365 -230), regulates certification, accreditation, enforcement 33 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Acton Ordinance — Exhibit B Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment and compliance for firms and individuals to use lead -safe work practices when working on pre -1978 homes or child- occupied facilities The regulations apply to training and certification requirements for individuals and firms and to accreditation requirements for training programs 3 7 land Use Patterns 0 Gorst Subarea Plan including design guidelines and development regulations for land use and stormwater • BMC Chapter 20 50, Landscaping • BMC Title 20, Land Use • BMC 20 14, Critical Areas 3 8 Socio- Economics • Chapters of the BMC and Comprehensive Plan include • BMC Title 20, Division III Zoning, with development standards in each zone as well as general and specific standards for particular uses • BMC Chapter 20 50, Landscaping • BMC Chapter 20 14, Critical Areas • Bremerton City Services Element of Comprehensive Plan 3 9 Aesthetics • Gorst Subarea Plan development and design regulations • Bremerton Comprehensive Plan • BMC Title 20 Land Use Shoreline Master Program (update adopted by City of Bremerton, currently in review by Ecology) – part of BMC Title 20 Land Use, Chapter 16 3 10 Cultural Resources • Governor's Executive Order 05 -05 Washington State Executive Order 05-05 — requires state agencies with capital improvement projects to integrate DAHP, the Governor's Office of Indian Affairs, and concerned tribes into their capital project planning processes 0 Chapter 27 44 RCW, Indian Graves and Records, provides for the protection of Native American graves and burial grounds, encourages voluntary reporting of said sites when they are discovered, and mandates a penalty for disturbance or desecration of such sites • Chapter 27 53 RCW, Archaeological Sites and Resources, governs the protection and preservation of archaeological sites and resources and establishes DAHP as the administering agency for these regulations • RCW 36 70A 020 includes a goal to "Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical, cultural, and archaeological significance " Cities planning under the Washington State GMA must consider and incorporate this historic preservation goal in their Comprehensive Plans and implementing development regulations • Chapter 68 60 RCW, Abandoned and Historic Cemeteries and Historic Graves, provides for the protection and preservation of abandoned and historic cemeteries and historic graves • City Historic Preservation Regulations The City of Bremerton has adopted historic preservation regulations to promote a special tax valuation to promote historic site rehabilitation and preservation and protect important archaeological and historic sites • City of Bremerton Shoreline Mater Program (SMP) The City's recently adopted SMP would, when approved by Ecology, include several protective measures including "a site assessment by a qualified professional archaeologist or historic preservation professional and ensure review by qualified parties including the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, and the Suquamish Tribe Archaeology and Historic Preservation Program" for properties with known cultural resources and "stop work" orders on any newly discovered cultural features with a requirement for notification of the State and tribes and an 34 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance – Exhibit B Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment assessment 3.11 Transportation • Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) laws Passed in 1991 as part of the Washington Clean Air Act (Chapter 70 94 RCW), the CTR law seeks to reduce workplace commute trips in the 10 most populous counties in the state This law requires that in designated high population counties, including Kitsap County and Bremerton, each employer with more than 100 employees will adopt a CTR plan Programs provide various incentives or disincentives to encourage use of alternative transportation modes other than the Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) City of Bremerton ordinances set goals for the reduction of SOV trips • City of Bremerton Roadway Standards, indicate that sidewalks are required on all roadway classifications The preferred location of the sidewalk is away from the roadway (separated by a landscape buffer) The minimum width of sidewalks in the City of Bremerton is five feet • City of Bremerton Non — Motorized Transportation Plan is a comprehensive document that provides an inventory and assessment of existing bicycle and pedestrian conditions with the City of Bremerton It also provides recommendations and strategies for system -wide improvements and opportunities to connect to regional systems such as the Mosquito Fleet Trail While the City of Bremerton Non - Motorized Transportation Plan does not specifically address the Gorst UGA, it does provide some routing options to the Mosquito Fleet Trail to provide and efficient non - motorized connection from Gorst to Bremerton • Washington State Department of Transportation ( WSDOT) Level of Service (LOS) Standards WSDOT sets LOS standards for use in evaluating the performance of Highways of Statewide Significance facilities based on RCW 47 06 140 (2), which in the Gorst UGA consist of all or portions of SR 3, and SR 16 The Table below presents the congestion indices for urban and rural highways (freeway and arterial types) that equate to an urban LOS D and a rural LOS C for peak -hour travel LO Standards for Highways of Statewide Significance Area / Facility Type LOS Congestion Index Freeway D 10 Arterial 10 Rural__ ____ ____ _____� _ Freeway C 6 Arterial C 6 Source WSDOT 2010 The HSS standards make a distinction between urban and rural areas For urban areas, the standard is LOS D, whereas the standard is LOS C in rural areas Urban /Rural designation is based upon the federal urban area rather than by UGA • City of Bremerton Roadways LOS standards are as follows V= Volume and C= capacity • Maintain LOS E or better (v /C less than or equal to 10) in the SR 303 (Warren /Wheaton) corridor, Kitsap way (SR 310), Sylvan Way, and the Manette Bridge • Maintain LOS D or better (WC less than or equal to 0 9) on all other arterial streets in the City of Bremerton However, while the City identifies the LOS measures above in its Transportation Element, the City also notes that some state routes are subject to different standards " WSDOT sets LOS standards for Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS), including State Routes (SR) 304, 310 and 3 in the City of Bremerton " See the 35 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment discussion below for more information • Bremerton Transportation Development Code (BMC Chapter 11 12) The purpose of the Transportation Development Code is to implement the transportation element of the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan, and to provide an orderly process for the adoption, implementation, interpretation and modification of City of Bremerton transportation system development standards (Chapter 1112 020) The Transportation Development Code gives the City of Bremerton Engineer the authority to request traffic impact analysis reports for proposed development projects if there is reason to believe the impact on the City of Bremerton's existing or planned future transportation facilities will be significant The City of Bremerton Engineer shall impose conditions necessary to mitigate all impacts of traffic, circulation and parking resulting from a project For segments, intersections, or other portions of the street system for which a LOS Standard has been adopted, mitigation measures shall be sufficient to assure that such segments, intersections or other portions of the street system continue to meet or exceed the adopted LOS standards after full project occupancy and operation For segments, intersections or other portions of the street system for where the present LOS is below the adopted standard, the mitigation measure shall be sufficient to maintain or exceed the present LOS (BMC Chapters 1112 060 and 11 12 070) 36 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit B Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment 3 12 Public Services 3 12.1 Fire Protection and • Fire Codes New development would be required to meet City of Bremerton EMS codes, as well as International Fire Code and International Building Code regulations, regarding the provision of fire hydrants, fire flow, alarm systems, sprinklers, and emergency vehicle access • Mutual Aid Agreements Fire protection districts in Kitsap County have entered into agreements with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to jointly fight fires on state -owned land and private forestland 312 2 Law Enforcement • Police department The department is maintained primarily through the general fund, which is funded through sales and property tax revenues The increased tax base associated with increased population and development would increase tax revenues and bonding potential, providing additional funding for law enforcement services and facilities 3 12 3 Schools • School District Six -year CIP School districts are required to plan for growth over time by regularly updating their six -year capital improvement program 3 12 5 Libraries • With additional development and population in the Gorst UGA, property tax revenues, which are the primary source of funding for the Kitsap Regional Library, would increase over time These additional revenues could be used to purchase additional circulation materials for the Downtown Bremerton and Port Orchard libraries to offset the additional demand generated by growth 3 13 Utilities, Water, Wastewater, Stormwater 3 13 1 Power • All future development of energy resources and transmission facilities would be required to comply with federal and state laws, the regulations of the Northwest Power Planning Council, and the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) 3 13 2 Solid Waste • Coordination and monitoring at transfer facilities and RAGFs would be ongoing to ensure adequate solid waste capacity Service levels for curbside collection as outlined in the CFP would continue or improve to encourage recycling 3 13 3 Water, Wastewater 9 Safe Drinking Water Act Sets national primary drinking water standards The act and Stormwater includes the designation of sole source aquifers The 1996 amendment identifies source water protection • Clean Water Act (CWA). Regulates discharge of stormwater from certain industries and municipalities NPDES permit or water quality discharge permit The EPA delegated the Department of Ecology the authority to implement these permits in Washington State • Drinking Water Regulations Chapter 70 116 RCW Directs the Washington State Department of Health to assure safe and reliable drinking water and protect drinking wells • Washington State Water Pollution Control Act Chapter 90 48 RCW Regulates various source control activities related to sediment management • City of Bremerton Comprehensive Wastewater Plan and Updates Ensures adequate existing and future wastewater capacity 0 City of Bremerton Stormwater Management Program Summarizes the actions to be taken by the City of Bremerton to fulfill its obligations as listed in the NPDES Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit • City of Bremerton BMC Chapter 15, Stormwater, SWMMWW and LID Guidance Manual Regulates for stormwater management associated with new development and redevelopment • Any future development would need to comply with applicable utility franchises and permits 37 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit B Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment 3 13 4 • Future construction of telecommunications infrastructure would be required to Telecommunications comply with federal and state laws, including the regulations of the FCC, the provisions of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, as appropriate, the regulations of the BMC, and the KCC 3 14 Relationship to Plans • See Land Use Patterns and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments and Policies 38 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Actron Ordinance — Exhibit B EXHIBIT C PUBLIC AGENCY ACTIONS AND COMMITMENTS 1 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit C EXHIBIT C PUBLIC AGENCY ACTIONS AND COMMITMENTS INTRODUCTION The City of Bremerton issued the Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on June 10, 2013 and the Final EIS published on October 8, 2013 The Draft and the Final EIS together are referenced herein as the "EIS" Under some elements of the environment, specific City, County, or other agency actions are identified Generally, incorporation of these actions is intended to provide for consistency within the Comprehensive Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, or between the Plan and implementing regulations, to document pending City or County actions, to establish a protocol for long -term measures to provide for coordination with other agencies, or to identify optional actions that the City or County may take to reduce impacts These actions are listed below in Table C -1, organized by the pertinent EIS element of the environment in which they are discussed Actions identified as "Proposed Concurrent Actions" refer to legislative actions proposed for adoption together with the Preferred Alternative CIP Actions identified as short term are currently underway or expected to be completed in time for the next mayor Comprehensive Plan review Longer term and other agency actions will occur in the future, depending on need The projected timeframe and responsible departments are identified and will be used in monitoring the implementation of the Planned Action Ordinance (PAO) This Exhibit C will be used in the monitoring process established in Ordinance No 5240 adopted February 19, 2014 2 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance - Exhibit C Exhibit C -1 Public Agency Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures Proposed Short Term Estimated Year of Concurrent Next Comp Plan Implementation and Actions Amendment Long Other Responsible Cycle or within Term Agency Department 5 years (upon annexation) Geology /Sods, Water Resources, Air Quality, Plants and Animals, Hazardous Materials, Land Use Patterns, Socio- Economics, Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, Transportation, Power, Telecommunications, Water, Wastewater, I Stormwater Adoption and implementation of Gorst X City of Bremerton Subarea Plan, and Gorst Creek and Kitsap County Watershed Characterization & 2013 Framework Plan Noise BMC Chapter 6 32 (Noise Levels) X City of Bremerton establishes limits on noise levels and 2016 or upon durations of noise crossing property annexation boundaries with the City of Bremerton Permissible noise levels at a receiving land use depend on the Noise Control District classification of the both the sound source and the receiving property The City of Bremerton Noise Control District classifications for land use zones will need to be updated with the new zoning classifications to be applied in Gorst through the subarea plan Public Services Fire Protection and EMS If the City of Bremerton experiences X Timing of this unexpected demand needs due to coordination would annexation of Gorst, the City of depend on the rate of Bremerton could work with South development in the Kitsap Fire and Rescue (SKFR) to Gorst UGA develop a Mutual Aid Agreement to Coordination would serve the Gorst UGA area This occur between the agreement could include information City of Bremerton on sharing levy revenues generated and SKFR within the Gorst UGA boundaries Upon amendment of the Countywide X X City of Bremerton in Planning Policies to reallocate consultation with population to Gorst or upon Kitsap County and annexation, the City Capital Facilities KRCC Plan should be amended to reflect Consider for 2016 updated level of service analysis Plan Update cycle included in the Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, and Gorst Planned Action EIS (October 2013) 3 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit C Mitigation Measures Proposed Short Term Estimated Year of Concurrent Next Comp Plan Implementation and Actions Amendment Long Other Responsible Cycle or within Term Agency Department 5 years (upon annexation) Law Enforcement Upon amendment of the Countywide X City of Bremerton in Planning Policies to reallocate consultation with population to Gorst or upon Kitsap County and annexation, the City Capital Facilities KRCC Plan should be amended to reflect Consider for 2016 updated level of service analysis Plan Update cycle included in the Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, and Gorst Planned Action EIS (October 2013) The City of Bremerton and Kitsap X Impacts to levels of County could pursue implementation service would be of mutual aid agreements if increasing assessed continually Gorst population impacts levels of and coordination service between City of Bremerton and Kitsap County would be on- going Schools To address enrollment changes on an X The School district ongoing basis, prior to reaching the would determine its level of demand that would necessitate demands on an construction of a new facility, districts ongoing basis can use portable classrooms to temporarily meet growth demands Portables can be funded by impact fees paid by residential developers The City, Kitsap County, and school X City County, and districts could work together to school district identify potential sites for new school coordination would development in areas where higher be ongoing amounts of growth are planned The City's regular review of the Capital X X City of Bremerton in Facilities Plan (CFP) in coordination consultation with with the school districts should allow Kitsap County and for ongoing long -range planning for KRCC educational services Consider for 2016 Upon amendment of the Countywide Plan Update cycle Planning Policies to reallocate population to Gorst or upon annexation, the City Capital Facilities Plan should be amended to reflect updated level of service analysis included in the Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, and Gorst Planned Action EIS (October 2013) 4 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit C Mitigation Measures Proposed Short Term Estimated Year of Concurrent Next Comp Plan Implementation and Actions Amendment Long Other Responsible Cycle or within Term Agency Department 5 years (upon annexation) Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Upon amendment of the Countywide X City of Bremerton in Planning Policies to reallocate consultation with population to Gorst or upon Kitsap County and annexation, the City Capital Facilities KRCC Plan should be amended to reflect Consider for 2016 updated level of service analysis Plan Update cycle included in the Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, and Gorst Planned Action EIS (October 2013) Libraries The Kitsap Regional Library could X Ongoing assessment partner with the Cities of Bremerton Kitsap Regional and Port Orchard to acquire additional Library circulation materials or expand their local branches to accommodate growth in Gorst The Kitsap Regional Library could X Ongoing assessment increase the amount of circulation Kitsap Regional materials and services that are Library available online to reduce demand for physical library space and offset new growth in Gorst s Utilities, Water, Wastewater, Stormwater Solid Waste Based on available landfill capacity at X Kitsap County in the County's current contracted landfill consultation with location a new or extended contract other agencies could be enacted to provide landfill including City of capacity well beyond the 2035 Bremerton planning horizon Relationship to Plans and Policies Gorst Creek Watershed X City of Bremerton Characterization & Framework Plan Kitsap County and Gorst Subarea Plan are submitted 2013 to the Washington State Department of Commerce The Gorst Subarea Plan and associated X EIS contain a land capacity analysis The County and City of Bremerton X X Prior to 2016 could work with KRCC to reallocate Mineral Population City of Bremerton population from undersized UGAs to Resource and Kitsap County Gorst to match Preferred Alternative Designation population levels This could be accomplished prior to the County and City of Bremerton's GMA required 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update 5 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Ackon Ordinance — Exhibit C Mitigation Measures Proposed Short Term Estimated Year of Concurrent Next Comp Plan Implementation and Actions Amendment long Other Responsible Cycle or within Term Agency Department 5 years (upon annexation) Until that time, the mineral resources designation in the Kitsap County plan could remain while the mine is still in active operation, thus not allowing residential growth until population targets are reallocated City regulations allow for mining to continue until such time as reclamation and redevelopment occur The Gorst Subarea Plan includes X City of Bremerton coordinated shoreline and critical area 2013 standards with the Gorst Creek Management Overlay to apply upon City Annexation 6 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance — Exhibit C AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Account #42742 AD #20139331 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KITSAP I, Christine Kendrick, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says That she is now, and at all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned was the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of KITSAP SUN, that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County of Kitsap, in which County it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Bremerton, Kitsap County, Washington, a weekly newspaper in Kitsap County, Washington and is now and during all of said time, was printed in an office maintained in the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, that the following is a true text of an advertisement as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said newspaper on the following date, to wit And on February 24, 2014 such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period The full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $35 60 This amount_ has not been paid in full cm (Signature of Principal Clerk) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of February 27, 2014 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Kitsap County NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON CHRISTY M MOFFITT My Appointment Expires July 08, 2018 ORDINANCE NO 5240 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, establishing a planned action for the Gorst Urban Growth Area pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act PASSED by the City Council on the 19th day of February, 2014 The full text of this ordinance is available from the City Clerk's Office, 345 Sixth Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 February 24, 2014 AD# 20139331