Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02/19/2014 AGENDA
j I t i CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 ❑ Phone (360) 473 -5280 FEBRUARY 19, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 1 BRIEFING 5 00 — 5 30 P M in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603 A General Council Business 2 CALL TO ORDER 5 30 P M in FIRST FLOOR CHAMBERS A Pledge of Allegiance B Invocation 3 MAYOR'S REPORT 4 BPD BRIEFING — City of Bremerton Police Chief Steve Strachan 5 PUBLIC RECOGNITION 6 CONSENT AGENDA A Claims & Check Register B Minutes of Planning Session — February 1, 2014 C Minutes of Meeting — February 5, 2014 D Minutes of Study Session — February 12, 2014 E Appointment of Jeremiah Wiley to the Parks & Recreation Commission F Purchase of (for replacement) three (3) 2014 Ford Interceptor Utility Vehicles from Columbia Ford of Longview, WA for the Police Department (Patrol Division) G Purchase of (for replacement) four (4) 2014 Ford Interceptor Vehicles from Columbia Ford of Longview, WA for the Police Department (Detectives Division) H Purchase of (for replacement) two (2) 2014 Pickup Trucks, one from Legacy Ford of Pasco, WA, and one from Bud Clary Chrysler Dodge of Longview, WA for the Parks Department 1 2014 Kitsap Physicians Service (KPS) Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria J Professional Services Agreement with Parametnx for the Design of the Marine Drive Low Impact Development (LID) Stormwater Retrofit Project 7 GENERAL BUSINESS — There are no General Business items tonight 8 PUBLIC HEARING A Public Hearing to approve Ordinance No 5240 establishing a Planned Action for the Gorst Urban Growth Area (UGA) 9 COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 10 ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING 11 EXEMPT CLOSED SESSION — Update on "Labor Negotiations" per RCW 42 30 140 (4)(b) (Information only ) ® Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request Those requiring special accommodations please contact the City Clerk at (360) 473 -5323 by noon on the day precedinq the Meetmq Vrodamation WHEREAS, Rotary International, founded on February 23, 1905, in Chicago, Illinois is the world's first and one of the largest non - profit humanitarian service organizations, and WHEREAS, there are over 12 million Rotary club members comprised of professional and business leaders in over 34,000 clubs in 200 countries and geographic areas, and WHEREAS, the Rotary motto "Service Above Self' inspires members to provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards, and promote good will and peace in the world, and WHEREAS, Rotary funds club projects and sponsors volunteers with community expertise to provide medical supplies, health care, clean water, food production, job training, and education to millions in need, particularly in developing countries, and WHEREAS, Rotary in 1985 launched PolioPlus and spearheaded efforts with the World Health Organization, U S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and UNICEF to immunize the children of the world against polio, and WHEREAS, polio cases have dropped by 99 percent since 1988 and the world stands on the threshold of eradicating the disease, and WHEREAS, to date, Rotary has contributed more than $1 billion and countless volunteer hours to the protection of more than two billion children against polio in 122 countries, and WHEREAS, Rotary has played a major role in decisions by donor governments to contribute $8 billion to the polio eradication effort and Rotary supports programs that strengthen the capacity of communities to provide basic education and literacy to all, and WHEREAS, there are two Rotary Clubs in Bremerton that include 173 Rotarians, these clubs actively sponsor service projects that address such critical issues as poverty, health, hunger, and the environment in Bremerton and throughout the State of Washington and abroad NOW, THEREFORE, I, Patty Lent, Mayor of the City of Bremerton, do hereby proclaim Sunday, February 23, 2014 as Rotary Birthday, and encourage all citizens to join me in recognizing Rotary International for its 109 years of service to improving the human condition in local communities around the world, and recognize as well the Rotary Clubs of Bremerton, Washington Signed this 19` day of February, 2014 Mayor Patty Lent tr� St b I 1N '� C'1 art �.ac�J9luy /� C'41. 3 5 314 956 � � � 7hrae hundrd �I�rmt ntn� /min +�M �' nIM hundred fi }y ie � 1 'as I II i a __ R oe S —d 6—If— rJ I I) 4 � 1 I � PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, American women of all backgrounds have made historic contributions to the growth and strength of our Nation in countless recorded and unrecorded ways, WHEREAS, American women were particularly important in the establishment of early charitable, philanthropic, social change, and cultural institutions in our Nation, WHEREAS, women have played and continue to play a critical economic, cultural, and social role in our community by constituting a significant portion of volunteers and the labor force working inside and outside of the home, WHEREAS, despite these contributions, the role of American women in history has been overlooked and undervalued, in the literature, teaching, and study of American history NOW, THEREFORE, I, Patty Lent, Mayor of the City of Bremerton, do hereby proclaim that March 7, 2014 is designated as Women's History Day in Bremerton to learn about and celebrate these women of character, courage, and commitment Signed this 19` day of February 2014 Mayor Patty Lent A t _ YN /y r KITSAP -� MUSEUM WOMEN'S Ho37oRV M0H7H WOMEN'S WORK: BREAKING THE MOLD Frida y, March 7 Exhibit Opening Event 5 -8PM Special Presentation at 6PM Kitsap County Historical Museum 280 4th St, Bremerton , �i7 tip' • � , r ■ s I T' �► _ _ �� ..1r� a "�5 /��� , � 1 � ' ���, ' � ` _ _ � T' y r, , G �..` _ `1M!; u. �. - ��' -• r .. - ' C ollective • Art • He i P anel Thursday, February 20 7=9PM Collective Visions Art Gallery Corner of 4th St &Pacific Ave Free to the Public! M S r EJ � op wOW-in" §� u3 Cal NOIDN V ro damatf o n WHEREAS, 2 4 million children and adults sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and another 795,000 individuals sustain an acquired brain injury (ABI) from non - traumatic causes each year, and WHEREAS, currently more than 5 3 million children and adults in the United States live with a lifelong disability as a result of TBI and an estimated 1 1 million have a disability due to stroke, and WHEREAS, causes of TBI include falls (35 percent), car crashes (17 percent), workplace accidents (16 percent) and assaults (10 percent), and WHEREAS the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that TBI costs the U S $76 3 billion each year in direct medical costs and indirect costs such as lost productivity, and WHEREAS, no two brain injuries are alike, and TBI is not an isolated event For many, it is the start of a lifelong neurological disability, often misdiagnosed and misunderstood Immediate access to expert trauma care, specialized rehabilitation and lifelong disease management are a few of the elements needed to restore and maintain quality of life, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Patty Lent, Mayor of the City of Bremerton, do hereby proclaim March 2014 as BRAIN INJURY AWARENESS MONTH and I call upon all government agencies, health organizations, communications media and people of Bremerton to observe this month with appropriate recognition to ensure their own safety and that of their loved ones Signed this 19th day of February 2014 Mayor Patty Lent �. .. � r• v �;�'yu ✓ �.�"�` '���f'�A tti��'ra�f `' : G�,�s�i �'cr 1 -G � ' �'� '' � �� t $f A. �� � w. cs� r �i � r � �j � /�;, '✓,. ,, '��. � , r z f l!LF���je} iN���.�+ � � yI f r l r r'lr " �',�s��„�,y,�✓ -;���w J� a :iv �........ + d � t b3�^y, 7 , a ✓ la�3Lr°_CJCSD, 0 ° I ° { _ 7 i � 1 � � � _ _ T 1Y1c1'� r ❑ 1 OGnppp� - r �' '17-1 r �o� er j l fl l U _ r7 I� I ` , , � 0 d i O I } ! I i r 1 i tt I 1 R r °`- 1 � a � Parking Ticket Amnes March 3,- 3 • Do you have unpaid 1 a rki n h oto / p � p ° #Y enforcement tickets? I a Do you have late z fees? k • is your account at collections? fi PARKING TICKET A MNESTY If you have 2 or more unpaid parking or photo E enforcement citations on your vehicle, you will be unable to renew the registration (tabs). i From March 3 — 31, 2014, the late fees ($25 on { most citations) and interest will be waived. You will only have to pay the original citation amount . R and the collection fee. *If you have a legal judgment on your account, you may not be eligible for this program. e I q Fries made prior to March 3, will not reflect hi rogram. Please contact the court for more information. r E I I Ti '+� �Dl c 0• I a 00 C Ti at+ 25 • + LOttQ FRA 25 ' + 26.25 + ' 001 Pet. 9.5 + I 85.75 0• Ti C.J' 25 • + C o l l F� 9.5 + 34.5 0 • 85.75 + - 34.5 - �'' 51 .25 � � 0• 4 BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL MMEETING SPEAKERS LIST PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME BELOW IF YOU PLAN TO COMMENT_ & YOU WISH YOUR NAME TO BE INCLUDED IN THE RECORD 4 REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CLERK THANK YOU i a?T�)w AUTO BODY REBUILD, INC 706 Pacific Avenue Bremerton, Washington 98337 (360) 377 -9797 Mayor Lent City Council Member February 19, 2014 Director Chal Martin City of Bremerton Mayor Lent, Council Members and Director Martin, PACIFIC AVENUE PROJECT i I would like to introduce myself, Cynthia Large, with Uptown Auto Body Rebuild In the City's enthusiasm to beautify Bremerton, the repercussion on business was not incorporated into the action plan well enough Hopefully, you can help reduce our impact from paving We received an e -mail requesting a three day window to pave the street, which translates to closure for us All of our customers drive their vehicle into our shop for repair or have it towed So, access is critical Appointments are scheduled by insurance carriers, not us We have been able, for the most part, to have them give the modified directions due to construction About 80% of our demographics are people that do not come to town They bypass Bremerton Our clientele gives Bremerton a chance to appeal to a larger population base So when the frustrated driver changes their mind and turns around, we both loose But now, let's look at a three day window If we ask the insurance company to turnoff appointments, it may take a week or several to get reinstated Even if scheduling was active on the fourth day, we have lost a week's gross income Our production is measured by the number of days the vehicle is in our possession If we get a car the day before the window and return it the day after, we have had it 5 days, not 2 We are scored by insurance carriers If we do not meet their rubric, our intake would be reduced until the annual review Please consider we area family of 15 families that depend on our paychecks, dust like you If Uptown is closed, we do not get paid We have not complained much with all of the past interruptions for planned or unforeseen issues The hardship hasn't Just fallen on Uptown, it has translated to all of us The least impact on Uptown would be the weekend We would gladly close the shop on Saturday for paving We dust need to be notified on Friday by end of day I can return to Uptown and make the necessary contacts about the closure Thanking you for your time, I remain Sincerely, Cynthia Large i AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON 6 f5 CITY COUNCIL s0 wa0ME00E000ENNEw00EaaN0E000E0NNMEEEE0wwE0E0aNK0a000000NM0E0000EEa000a00000M000M0000001 SUBJECT Minutes of Planning Session — Study Session Date N/A February 1, 2014 COUNCIL MEETING Date February 19, 2014 Department City Council Presenter Greg Wheeler Council President Phone (360) 473 -5280 SUMMARY Attached is the summary of the City Council Meeting ATTACHMENTS Meeting Minutes FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) STUDY SESSION AGENDA ❑x No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION ❑x Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented COUNCIL ACTION ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 01/25/13 DIGITAL RECORDING CITY COUNCIL JOINT PLANNING SESSION MINUTES Saturday, February 1, 2014 A Joint Planning Session between the City Council, Mayor, and Department Directors of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the Mayor's Conference Room of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER, 345 6th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Saturday, February 1, 2014, at 9 00 AM, with Council President Greg Wheeler presiding Council Members present were Eric Younger, Roy Runyon, Dino Davis, Jerry McDonald, Leslie Daugs, and Mike Sullivan Also in attendance were Mayor Patty Lent, City Attorney Roger Lubovich, Municipal Court Administrator Dawn Nelson, Parks & Recreation Director Wyn Birkenthal, Public Works & Utilities Director Chal Martin, Interim Financial Services Director Cathy Johnson, Police Chief Steven Strachan, Fire Chief Al Duke, and Community Development Director Andrea Spencer Lori Smith, Legislative Assistant and Christine Grenier, Council /Auditor Assistant were present to provide staff support The following is a summarized list of the subjects and key points that were discussed • Local Street Funding • Continue to fund by paying "ourselves" first • Possibly dedicate a set - percentage of REET amount in Reserve Funds (Finance Committee) • Mayor Road Projects • Develop checklist to ensure Mayor Road Projects are completed (PW Committee) • Do more work in -house to ensure no cost overruns (per PW, this is being done) • Keep Project Estimates by City Engineers as the benchmark to avoid overruns • ERR Funding Policy • Update /Revise the current ERR Funding Policy (Finance Committee) • Decide which practice will be used then develop a Funding Policy (Finance Department will provide options) • City Marketing, Planning, and Tourism • Lodging Tax Funding • Roles of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC), City Council, and City Clerk were clarified through provisions in State Law (RCW 67 28) and Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC 2 38) • For selection of LTAC members, preference should be given to representatives for those organizations not applying for or receiving funds during the term of office • Established that LTAC Chair and all members will continue to observe appearance of fairness with respect to applicants • LTAC Chair will report to the Council following each meeting • City Clerks' Reports to the State will be shared with the Council • Council will deliberate on LTAC recommendations and take action prior to Budget process • Once recommendations are approved by Council, any further issues that may be discussed can be remanded to LTAC for review • Continue funding summer foot ferry between Bremerton and Port Orchard • No money to hire a marketing person • Find ways to communicate the positive side of Bremerton to outside markets • Business Development • Largest part of the equation is set by Fire Codes and Building Codes • Ensure codes /policies support small business growth o Enhance Business Climate o Improved Permitting Process City Council Planning Session Minutes Saturday, February 1, 2014 Page 2 of 2 • Rezoning • Annexation • Long -term goal to increase population 50,000+ • Focus on higher assessed values such as commercial areas • What is current vacancy rate and cost per sq ft • Look at how other Councils and Cities have done to increase comparables • Rely on work being done by Kitsap Economic Development Alliance (KEDA) • Mayor will share reports from KEDA Executive Board • Link for "Starting a Business in Bremerton" • Explore ways to provide WiFi downtown and expand fiber optics to neighborhoods • Improving Financial Sustainability of City Parks o Continue to look at ways to fund Parks • Alternative Fuels • Council will be provided a list of what the City is currently doing to meet this goal • Utilize studies already being done by the State • PW is expected to receive an update in March • Contract Compliance • How to hold construction companies accountable to follow City Codes • Withholding permits • Work with neighbors /neighborhoods of East Park to ensure quality of life The final list of " 2014 to 2015 Goals & Priorities were determined to be as follows 1 Continue to look for ways to increase funding for the following • Streets • Annexation • Building Contingency Reserve Fund 2 Expand Communication with Citizens through Website & Social Media 3 Explore options for Marketing and Branding 4 Update Equipment Rental & Reserve (ER &R) Funding Policy 5 Encourage Business Development 6 Determine Sustainable Business Model for Parks & Recreation 7 Neighborhood Traffic Improvements With no further business, President Wheeler adjourned the Council Planning Session at 2 35 PM Prepared and Submitted by �w Attest LORI SMITH, Legislative Assistant SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk GREG WHEELER, City Council President AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ■■ �����s����s�e0NMM000000wNffxE000000000000000N00EEEE000aN000Ma00EEwMEE0E00ss00K00EE00N01 SUBJECT Minutes of Meeting — Study Session Date N/A February 5, 2014 COUNCIL MEETING Date February 19, 2014 Department City Council Presenter Greg Wheeler Council President Phone (360) 473 -5280 SUMMARY Attached is the summary of the City Council Meeting ATTACHMENTS Meeting Minutes FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) STUDY SESSION AGENDA N No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION Nx Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented COUNCIL ACTION ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 01/25/13 DIGITAL RECORDING CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, February 5, 2014 The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order Wednesday, February 5, 2014, at 5 00 PM in Council Conference Room 603 of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER, 345 6` Street, Bremerton, Washington, with Council President Greg Wheeler presiding Council Members present were Eric Younger, Roy Runyon, Dino Davis, Jerry McDonald, Leslie Daugs, and Mike Sullivan Also present were City Attorney Roger Lubovich, City Clerk Shannon Conn, and Council Assistant Christine Grenier A COUNCIL BRIEFING was held to discuss General Council Business at 5 00 PM in the Council Conference Room At 5 30 PM the meeting moved to the Meeting Chambers The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Mike Sullivan followed by the invocation provided by Pastor Jerry Michaels of Voyage MAYOR'S REPORT — Mayor Patty Lent • Recognized Public Works & Utilities Director Chal Martin and Wastewater Division Staff Pat Coxon and Rick Zimburean for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Pump Replacement Project, • Reported that as a result of her meeting with the Kitsap Sun, those choosing to opt out from receiving delivery of separate "A & E" inserts may call (360) 792 -9222 or email aedelivery(a)kitsapsun com • Proclaimed the Month of February 2014 as "Black History Month ", • Announced "Life on the Edge 2" will be held on Wednesday, March 12 from 9 00 AM to 5 00 PM at the Kitsap Conference Center featuring guest speakers Kitsap County Commissioner Linda Streissguth and Police Chief Steve Strachan, • Shared photos of how employees have showed their "12` Man" Pride beginning with a Rally last Friday through the Super Bowl, and • Was pleased with the incredible building permit activity in the past few weeks PUBLIC RECOGNITION Bob Dollar thanked the Mayor for approaching the newspaper issue and commented that the inserts have been found littering alleys and vacant properties Mike Walton provided an update on the events and activities at the Kitsap Family YMCA Ken Brown Bremerton Fraternal Order of Eagles (BFOE), announced that there will be a Charity Marathon to benefit Veteran Homelessness on September 23 CONSENT AGENDA 5A — Claims & Check Register Check Numbers 356708 through 356975, and EFT -13533 through EFT -13579 in the amount of $1,960,469 16, Regular Payroll for the pay period ending January 15, 2014 in the amount of $691,754 65, and Retiree Payroll for the pay period ending January 31, 2014 in the amount of $55,463 54 5B — Minutes of Meeting — January 15, 2014 5C — Minutes of Meeting — January 22, 2014 5D — Amendment No 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Willis of Seattle, Inc for Insurance Broker Services 5E — 2014 Excess Liability Insurance with Ironshore Specialty Insurance, Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance with Midwest Employers Casualty Company, and Crime Insurance with Great American Insurance City Council Reg Mtg Minutes Wednesday, February 5, 2014 Page 2 of 4 5F — Interlocal Cooperative Purchasing Agreement between the City of Bremerton and Snohomish Fire District No 1 for the purchase of one (1) ambulance from Braun NW 5G — Interlocal Agreement between the City of Bremerton and Kitsap County for a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) 5H — Purchase of three (3) Flygt Dry-Pit Submersible Pumps for Pump Station CW -2 51— Sole Source Purchase of two (2) new Alfa Laval Spiral Heat Exchangers for the Westside Wastewater Treatment Plant 5J — Purchase and Replacement of existing Air Handling Unit from Holaday- Parks, Inc for Building 400 at the Westside Wastewater Treatment Plant 5K — Appointment of Jim McDonald to the Bremerton Housing Authority Board of Commissioners 5L — Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between IAFF Local 437 and the City of Bremerton 5M — Appointment of Nick Wofford to the Planning Commission 5N — Approval to Hire Project Temporary Employee for Lower Wheaton Way Project There were no questions or comments from the public 5 55 45 Motion was made by Younger and seconded by Davis Comments and questions were then provided by Runyon (Item 5L) with responses by Charlotte Belmore and Fire Chief Al Duke, and Runyon and Wheeler (Item 5M) with responses provided by Mayor Lent 06 01 42 M /S /C /U (Younger /Davis) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented GENERAL BUSINESS 6A — RESOLUTION NO 3212 APPROVING PHASE 5 OF THE BAY VISTA FINAL PLAT Allison Daniels Community Development, explained that the action before the City Council is to approve Phase 5 of the Bay Vista Final Plat The Bay Vista Subarea Plan was approved by City Council with Ordinance No 5077 on February 25, 2009 An update to the Bay Vista Subarea Plan was approved by City Council with Ordinance No 5202 on December 19, 2012 Preliminary Plat approval was granted by the Administrative Hearings Examiner on July 9, 2009 for the subdivision of 82 acres After the City Council's approval of the updated Bay Vista Subarea Plan, the Hearing Examiner approved the Preliminary Plat Amendment to verify compliance with the updated Subarea Plan on December 26, 2013 Approvals that have been previously issued include the following • Phase I by Resolution No 3114 on May 5, 2010 • Phase 2 by Resolution No 3148 on June 1, 2011 • Phase 3 by Resolution No 3153 on October 19, 2011 • Phase 4 by Resolution No 3163 on February 1, 2012 Proposed Phase 5 would include 45 acres, 15 lots, 2 parks, and a stormwater tract There were no questions or comments from the public 06 08 42 Motion was made by Davis and seconded by Younger Questions and comments were provided by Davis, Runyon, Daugs, and McDonald, with responses provided by Ms Daniels 06 11 39 M /S /C /U (Davis/Younger) Move to adopt Resolution No 3212 approving Phase 5 of the Bay Vista Final Plat, and authorizing the City Council President to sign the Mylar City Council Reg Mtg Minutes Wednesday, February 5, 2014 Page 3 of 4 6B — PACIFIC AVENUE BUDGET ADJUSTMENT, FUNDING, AND PROJECT ACCELERATION Chal Martin Public Works & Utilities Director, summarized that the City awarded the contract to RV Associates for construction of Pacific Avenue (6 to 11 Street Improvements) in May 2013 Due primarily to differing site conditions resulting in incorporation of material quantities beyond the proposal amount, costs on the project, have increased to the point that a budget adjustment is necessary Related to this, the projected transfer of funds from the Water and Wastewater Utility Capital funds also require adjustment In addition, staff has coordinated a proposed change order with RV Associates to accelerate substantial completion of the project to April 18, 2014 Finally, upon completion of the work, a Final Change Order will be executed to reconcile actual field quantities with the bid quantities which is expected to exceed the Administrative Change Order Authority of the Mayor Comments and questions from the public were provided by Robert Parker and Bob Dollar, with responses provided by Mr Martin 06 17 47 Motion was made by Younger, and seconded by Davis Questions and comments were provided by Davis, Runyon, Daugs, and McDonald, and responses were provided by Mr Martin 06 36 15 M /S /C (Younger /Davis) Move to approve an increase in the Pacific Avenue 6 th to 11 th Street Construction Fund budget in the amount of $317,218 for construction cost carryover exceeding the original 2014 budget adjustment, and an additional $141,326 for increased project costs, and to authorize an additional transfer from the Water Fund up to $50,000, authorize an additional transfer from the Wastewater Fund up to $160,000, approve an $18,000 Change Order with RV Associates to be paid if substantial completion is met by April 18, 2014, and authorize Administrative Change Order Authority for the Mayor at $538,000 Voted in favor of Motion McDonald, Davis, Younger, Sullivan, Daugs, and Wheeler Voted Opposed to Motion Runyon Motion carried 6 -Yes, 1 -No COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mike Sullivan reported on Kitsap Transit Board, and was amazed by the outpouring of support for the Seahawks Leslie Daugs attended the Association of Washington City Action Days Conference last week and emphasized that transportation was a key issue discussed with legislators, was pleased with business development in District 2, and thanked the City staff for doing a great fob in keeping traffic moving earlier today in support of the Seahawks Jerry McDonald shared photos of the activity downtown and added "Go Hawks"', looked forward to the Hospice Thrift Shop that will be opening in downtown soon, and hoped to see the community at the First Friday Artwalk Dino Davis also commented in support of the Seahawks adding that our local restaurants also benefited from Super Bowl with many take -out orders, and announced that he may be contacted via Facebook or Twitter Roy Runyon announced that there will be a Volunteer Clean -Up of the Right -of -Way beginning at Matan Park picnic shelter at 9 00 AM and will include 19 Street near the future Lilian & James Walker Park, including along Naval Avenue, and following will be "Coffee with a Council Member" at 10 30 AM at Hi- Lo's Cafe at 2720 15 Street Lastly, he offered his sympathy due to the passing of Jim Anderson and his dog Raffle City Council Reg Mtg Minutes Wednesday, February 5, 2014 Page 4 of 4 Eric Younger also was thrilled about the Seahawks, reported on the Council and Mayor Joint Planning Retreat held last Saturday, added that the City needs to address the social media policy before opening the door to citizen contact Greg Wheeler was amazed at the energy from the Super Bowl and also thrilled with the Seahawks President Wheeler announced that the Transportation Benefit District Board Meeting would be held immediately following the Council Meeting tonight With no further business, he adjourned the Council Meeting at 6 48 PM Prepared and Submitted by �Z , 4 **- CHRISTINE GR NIER Council Assistant Attest SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk r GREG WHEELER, City Council President GW SC Is cg AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ■ o�����������a��00a000wNM00EE000000000E0E0000 0000MEEEw0zaxff00MNffa0EM00ww000 00MMM0000aV01 SUBJECT Minutes of Study Session — Study Session Date N/A February 12, 2014 COUNCIL MEETING Date February 19, 2014 Department City Council Presenter Greg Wheeler Council President Phone (360) 473 -5280 SUMMARY Attached is the summary of the City Council Meeting ATTACHMENTS Meeting Minutes FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) STUDY SESSION AGENDA N No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION N Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented COUNCIL ACTION ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 01/25/13 DIGITAL RECORDING CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES Wednesday, February 12, 2014 A Study Session of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the Council Conference Room of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER, 345 6 1 Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, February 12, 2014, at 5 00 PM, with Council President Greg Wheeler presiding Council Members present were Eric Younger, Roy Runyon, Dino Davis, Jerry McDonald, Leslie Daugs, and Mike Sullivan Lori Smith, Legislative Assistant, was present to provide staff support President Wheeler emphasized that the Study Session was open to the public but there would be no opportunities for input or participation, and announced that approved items by Council will be placed on the February 19, 2013 Council Meeting Agenda, or as indicated A NO PRESENTATION PLANNED -The following items are budgeted items or have been reviewed by the appropriate Council Committee 1 Appointment of Jeremiah Wiley to the Parks & Recreation Commission (Consent Agenda) Mr Wiley was present, and introduced himself to the Council Members 2 Purchase of (for replacement) three (3) 2014 Ford Interceptor Utility Vehicles from Columbia Ford of Longview, WA for the Police Department (Patrol Division) (Consent Agenda) 3 Purchase of (for replacement) four (4) 2014 Ford Interceptor Vehicles from Columbia Ford of Longview, WA for the Police Department (Detectives Division) (Consent Agenda) 4 Purchase of (for replacement) two (2) 2014 Pickup Trucks, one from Legacy Ford of Pasco, WA, and one from Bud Clary Chrysler Dodge of Longview, WA for the Parks Department (Consent Agenda) 5 2014 Kitsap Physicians Service (KPS) Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria (Consent Agenda) 6 Professional Services Agreement with Parametrix for the Design of the Marine Drive Low Impact Development (LID) Stormwater Retrofit (Consent Agenda) Mr Martin stated a Public Meeting would be scheduled at the appropriate time B FULL PRESENTATION 7 Proposed Public Hearing on Planned Action Ordinance for the Gorst Urban Growth Area (Public Hearing) 8 Proposal for Parking Ticket Amnesty for old fines — Dawn Nelson, Bremerton Municipal Court Administrator (Information only) GENERAL COUNCIL BUSINESS o Finance & Investment Committee Briefing (1128114 Meeting) — Roy Runyon, Chair o Public Works Committee Briefing (2104114 Meeting) — Dino Davis, Chair o Public Safety and Parks Committee (2112114 Meeting) — Leslie Daugs, Chair City Council Special Meeting Minutes Wednesday, February 12, 2014 Page 2 of 2 • Summary of 2015 Council Goals (2101114 Planning Session) — Greg Wheeler, Council President • Other General Council Business (As necessary ) With no further business, President Wheeler adjourned the Council Study Session at 7 00 PM Pre red and Submitted by L RI SMITH Legislative Assistant Attest SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk GREG WHEELER, City Council President GW SC Is cg AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ■■ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee■ SUBJECT Appointment of Jeremiah Wiley Study Session Date February 12, 2014 to the Parks and Recreation Commission COUNCIL MEETING Date February 19, 2014 Department Executive Presenter Mayor Lent Phone 473 -5266 SUMMARY There is a vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commission due to the vacancy left by the departure of Christopher Warthen It is recommended the vacancy be filled by Mr Jeremiah Wiley ATTACHMENTS Mr Wiley's application for appointment is available in the Mayor's office FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) No fiscal impacts STUDY SESSION AGENDA 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION © Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to approve the appointment of Jeremiah Wiley to fill the vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commission COUNCIL ACTION ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 11/02/12 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL •■ rrreeerrrerreeeerrerrrrreerrerrrreeerrerrrrrrrrrrrreerrerrrrreeeerrrrrrrrreeerrrrrrrr SUBJECT Purchase (for replacement) of Study Session Date 2/12/14 three (3) Police Patrol vehicles COUNCIL MEETING Date 2/19/14 Department ERR Presenter Jim Orton Phone 473 -5359 SUMMARY The approved 2014 budget for ERR shows replacement of three (3) front line police patrol vehicles The Department requests to purchase three (3) 2014 Ford Interceptor Utility vehicles We will be utilizing Washington state contract for purchase the authorized dealer is Columbia Ford of Longview Washington The total cost of the vehicles only is $98,300 66 including Washington state sales tax ATTACHMENTS 1) Copy of Washington state contract, 2) Specifications FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) Funding available thru ERR 510 STUDY SESSION AGENDA ❑x No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION © Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to authorize purchase of three (3) 2014 Ford Interceptor Utility vehicles from Columbia Ford in the amount of $98,300 66 including Washington state sales tax COUNCIL ACTION ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 11/02/12 Charles Ernst _ s From: Mane Tellinghiusen <manet@colford com> Sent Tuesday, February 04, 201410 AM TO. Charles Ernst Subject: Pursuit Bumper with strobe i 1h Chuck, Okay, have pricing confirmation for the upgrade to add the center strobe to the push bumper #999 Push Bumper, Lighted Pursuit, Front/Side Red/Blue LEDs, Front Center Clear Linear Strobe (Setma PB450L5) $895.00 i Made Tellingbiusen Government Contracts Manager Columbia Ford Lincoln Hyundai Nissan Telephone- 360- 423 -4321 ext 187 FAX. 360 -423 -6056 E -Mail manet a colford com i } 1 PRICING AND ORDERING CHECKLIST, POLICE PURSUIT UTILITY VEHICLE BASE VEHICLE ORDER CODE 2314 - 088 -001 MAKE /MODEL I Ford Interceptor AWD Utility (K8A) EXTERIOR COLORS Note Insert Quantity Next to Color Option Oxford White YZ Sterling Grey Metallic UJ Ultra Blue Metallic MM Deep Impact Blue J4 Medium Titanium Metallic YG Ebony Black UA Norsea Blue Metallic KR Kodiak Brown Metallic JS Ingot Silver Metallic UX Silver Grey Metallic TN Dark Toredor Red Metallic JL Smokestone Metallic HG Light Ice Blue Metallic LS Light Grey TM Medium Brown Metallic BU Arizona Beige E3 Light Blue Metallic LN Royal Blue -LM Dark Blue LK Deep Impact Blue J4 OPTION OPTION DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE EACH PRICE EXTENSION ORDER CODE 2314 - 088 -001 Base Vehicle, Ford Police Interceptor Utility /SUV AWD (K8A /500A) 3 $26,58700 $79 J 61 2314 - 088 -002 Credit for pickup from Dealer (Orders for Eastern Washington) (Deduct) -$13000 ($ (DLR) 2314 - 088 -003 Credit for pickup from Dealer (Orders for Western Washington) (Deduct) -$3000 ($ (DLR) 2314 - 088 -004 Alternative Engine, 3 5L V6 EcoBoost with 6 -speed Automatic Transmission $327400 $ (131mph top speed)(99T /44C) 2314 - 088 -005 Ready for the Road Package [Includes contents of Front Headlamp Lighting $308800 $ Solution #66A, Tad Lamp Lighting Solution #66B, Rear Lighting Solution 66C, Cargo Wiring Upfit Package #67G, Ultimate Wiring Package #67U, plus Whelen Cencom Light Controller Head with dimmable backlight, Whelen Cencom Relay Center /Siren /Amp with Traffic Advisor mounted behind 2nd row seat, Light controller /relay cencom wiring with additional input /output pigtails, high current pigtail, Wheln Specific WECAN cable (console to cargo area) connects Cencom to Control Head, Pre - wiring for grille LED lights, siren and speaker #60A, Rear console Plate #85R Grille inear LED lights (Red /Blue), 100 —Watt Siren /Speaker, Hidden Door -Lock Plunger /Rear Door Handles Inoperable #52P, Wiring Harness with two)(2) 0 -Amp battery and ground circuits in RH rear quarter](67H) 2314 - 088 -006 Cargo Wiring Upfit, Includes Rear Console Plate #85R, wiring overlay $119300 $ harness with lighting and siren interface connections, Vehicle Engine Harness two (2) light connectors to support up to six (6) LED lights, two (2) grille light connectors, two (2) 50 -amp battery ground circuits in right hand rear - quarter power distribution function block, one (1) 10 -amp iren /speaker circuit (engine to cargo area), Whelen Lighting PCC8R Control Head, Whelen PCC8R Light Relay Center mounted behind 2 nd row seat, Light ontroller /relay center wiring bumper harness), Whelen Specific Cable (console to cargo area)(Connects PCC811 to Control Head), Pre - wiring for grille LED lights, siren and speaker #60A)] (Does not include LED Lights, Recommend Police Wire Harness Connector Kits #47C and 21P) (67G) 2314 - 088 -007 Front Headlamp /Housing Only (Includes pre - drilled hole for side marker $11300 $ police use and pre - molded side warning LED holes with standard twist lock Baled capabdity)(does not include LED installed lights)(N /A with Ready for he Road Package #67H) (86P) 2314 - 088 -008 Front Headlamp Lighting Solution, Includes base projector beam headlamps 3 $81300 2,439 plus two (2)multi- function park /turn /warn(PTW) bulbs for wig -way emulation and two (2) white hemispheric lighthead LED side warning lights, pre -wire for grille LED lights, siren and speaker #60A)(LED lights included, controller not mcluded)(N /A with Ready for the Road Package #67H) (66A) Pricing & Ordering - Ford Interceptor Utility Page 1 of 5 PRICING & ORDERING CHECKLIST FORD INTERCEPTOR, UTILITY (CONT 2314 -088 -009 Rear Lighting Solution [Includes two (2) backlit flashing linear high - intensity $40600 $ LED lights (driver's side red /passenger side blue) mounted to inside liftgate lass, two (2) backlit flashing linear high - intensity LED lights (driver's side red /passenger side blue) installed on inside lip of liftgate (lights activate w hen liftgate is open)( LED lights only Wiring, controller not included)(66C) 2314 -088 -010 Tail Lamp Lighting Solution (includes two (2) rear integrated white LED $37900 $ Lights in tail lamps) (Included with Ready for the Road Package #67H )(66B) 2314- 088 -011 Ultimate Wiring Package [Includes Rear Console Mounting Plate #85R, Pre- $49100 $ firing for grille LED lights, siren and speaker #60A, Plus Wiring harness I/P to Rear (overlay) two (2) light cables — supports up to six (6) LED lights (engine compartment /grille), two 92) 50 -amp battery and ground circuits in RH rear - quarter, one (1) 10 -amp siren /speaker circuit engine cargo area, rear hatch /cargo area wiring — supports up to six (6) rear LED lights] (Recommend Police Wire Harness Connector Kits #47C and #21P)(N /A with Interior Upgrade Pkg #65U, Cargo Wiring Upfit Pkg #67G or Ready for the Road Pkg #67H)( 67U) 2314 -088 -012 Police Wire Harness Connector Kit — Front (For connectivity to Ford PI $9500 $ Package Solutions) [Includes two (2) male 4 -pin connectors for siren, five (5) female 4 -pin connectors for lighting/stren /speaker, one (1) 4 -pm IP connector for speakers, one (1) 4 -pin IP connector for siren controller connectivity, one (1) 8 -pin sealed connector, one (1) 14 -pOin IP onnector](47C) 2314 -088 -013 Police Wire Harness Connector Kit — Rear (For connectivity to Ford PI $11800 $ Package Solutions) [Includes one (1) 2 -pin connector for rear lighting, one (1) -pin connector, six (6) female 4 -pin connectors, six (6) male 4 -pin c onnectors, one (1) 10 -pin connector](21P) 2314 - 088 -014 Interior Upgrade, (Includes full carpeting, carpeted floor mats, center floor $34800 $ console w/ cupholders)(retains column shifter)(deletes standard console mounting plate between front seats) (Not available with Ready for the Road or Cargo Wiring Packages)(65U) 2314 - 088 -015 Auxiliary Air - Conditioning (N /A with Cargo Storage Vault #63V) (17A) $54300 $ 2314 - 088 -016 Ballistic Door Panel - Driver only (90D) $141100 $ 2314- 088 -017 Ballistic Door Panels - Driver & Passenger Front Door (90E) $282400 $ 2314 - 088 -018 Badge Delete (16D) $000 $ 2314 -088 -019 BLIS Blind Spot Monitoring with Cross - traffic Alert DELETE (also deletes 3 -$41500 -1,245 Heated Sideview Mirrors)(May be ordered separately #549) (D55B)(Dedud) 2314- 088 -020 Heated Sidewew Mirrors (only order if deleting BLIS #55B)(549) 3 $5500 165 2314 - 088 -021 Cap, Locking Gas (19L) $1800 $ 2314 - 088 -022 Carpeting In Lieu of Rubber Floor Covering (16C) $11200 $ 2314 - 088 -023 Daytime Running Lights (942) $3700 $ 2314 - 088 -024 Dark Car Feature (courtesy lamp disable when any door is opened) (43D) 3 $1600 2314 - 088 -025 Delayed Warranty Start, customer submits request at www fordwsd com $000 $ 2314 - 088 -026 Dome Lamp— Red /White in Cargo Area 17T 3 $4600 138 2314 - 088 -027 Doors /Locks Rear Door Handles Inoperable / Locks Operable (68L) $3300 $ 2314 - 088 -028 Doors /Locks Rear Door Handles Inoperable / Locks Inoperable (68G) 3 $3300 9 Pricing & Ordering - Ford Interceptor Utility Page 2 of 5 PRICING & ORDERING CHECKLIST FORD INTERCEPTOR, UTILITY (CONT 2314 - 088 -029 Doors /Locks Hidden Door Lock Plunger with Rear Door Handles Operable $12500 $ (52H) 2314 -088 -030 Doors /Locks Hidden Door Lock Plunger with Rear Door Handles Inoperable $14300 $ (included with Ready for the Road Package #67H)(52P) 2314 - 088 -031 Fleet Keyed Alike (Call dealer for available key codes)(N /A with Remote 3 $4400 13 Keyless Entry #595) (KEY) 2314 - 088 -032 Heater, Engine Block (41H) $3200 $ 2314 - 088 -033 Perimeter Anti -Theft Alarm (activated by hood, door or liftgate)(Must also $10800 $ order Remote Keyless Entry #595)(593) 2314 - 088 -034 Pre - Wiring for grille lamp, siren and speaker (60A) $4700 $ 2314 - 088 -035 Power Windows, Driver Control (deletes rear window power controls) 3 $2000 6 (18W) 2314 - 088 -036 Remote Keyless Entry w /Two Transmitters (N /A with Fleet Keyed $23500 $ like)(595) 2314 - 088 -037 Rear Console Plate (wiring conduit from front console plate to rear seat) 3 $3200 9 (N /A with Interior Upgrade Package #65U or Front Console Plate Delete 85D) (85R) 2314 - 088 -038 Reverse Sensing System (76R) $24500 $ 2314- 088 -039 Rearview Camera DELETE (video is displayed in rearview electrochromic 3 -$21800 -65 irror)(D21B) (Deduct) 2314 - 088 -040 SYNC Basic Voice - Activated Communications System DELETE (Includes -$26300 ($ ) Ingle USB port and single auxiliary audio input Jack) (Must also delete Rearview Camera (D53M) (Deduct) 2314 - 088 -041 Remappable (4) switches on steering wheel (if ordered with SYNC, 3 $13900 417 includes Voice Button) (61R/61S) 2314 - 088 -042 Siren/Speaker 100 Watt (includes bracket & pigtail) (18X) $26800 $ 2314 - 088 -043 Spot Lamp- driver only (incandescent bulb) (51Y) 3 $18100 543 2314 - 088 -043 Spot Lamp- dual (incandescent bulbs) (51Z) $29700 $ 2314 - 088 -045 Spot Lamp, LED Bulb, Driver Only (Urnty)(51R) $35500 $ 2314 - 088 -046 pot Lamp, LED Bulb, Driver Only (Whelen)(51T) $37400 $ 2314 - 088 -047 l ide pot Lamps, LED Bulbs, Dual (Urnty)(51S) $55200 $ 2314 - 088 -048 pot Lamps, LED Bulbs, Dual (Whelen)(51V) $59400 $ 2314 - 088 -049 Marker LED, Sideview Mirrors(63B) $20200 $ 2314 - 088 -050 Stock Vehicle Upcharge (Call dealer or SPO for availability) Delivery within 7 $25000 $ days when available (DLR) 2314 - 088 -051 Vinyl Seats, 2nd Row (Deduct) (TT9) -$5400 ($ 2314 - 088 -052 Wheel covers (18" full face wheel covers) (64B) $5500 $ 2314 -088 -053 Privacy Glass DELETE 2nd & 3rd Row (replaces with solar - tinted glass (92G) $11000 $ 2314 - 088 -054 Privacy Glass DELETE 2nd Row Only (replaces with solar - tinted glass (92R) $7800 $ 2314 - 088 -055 Roof Rack Side Rails, Black (68Z) $9000 $ 2314 - 088 -056 Deflector Plate (std on EcoBoost engine)(76D) 3 $29800 89 2314 - 088 -057 wo -Tone Vinyl — Roof Only, White(91H) $43700 $ 2314 - 088 -058 wo -Tone Vinyl, White, (RH /LH Front Doors)(91J) $275001 $ Pricing & Ordering - Ford Interceptor Utility Page 3 of 5 PRICING & ORDERING CHECKLIST FORD INTERCEPTOR, UTILITY (CONT.) 2314 - 088 -059 Two-Tone Vinyl Wrap Package #1, White (Roof, RH /LH Front Doors, RH /LH 3 $74800 2,2 Rear Doors)(91A) 2314 - 088 -060 Two-Tone Vinyl Wrap Package #2, White (Roof & Hood)(916) $74800 $ 2314 - 088 -061 Two-Tone Vinyl Wrap package #3, White (Roof, RH /LH Front Doors) (91C) $62300 $ 2314 - 088 -062 Vinyl Word Wrap, "POLICE ", non - reflective white lettering, located on $70800 $ LH /RH sides of vehicle(91D) 2314 - 088 -063 Vinyl Word Wrap, "POLICE ", reflective white lettering, located on LH /RH $70800 $ ides of vehicle(91F) 2314 - 088 -064 Vinyl Word Wrap, "POLICE ", reflective black lettering, located on LH /RH $70800 $ ides of vehicle(91E 2314 - 088 -065 Vinyl Word Wrap, "SHERIFF ", non - reflective white lettering, located on $70800 $ LH /RH sides of vehicle(91G) 2314 - 088 -066 Full carpeting, includes 1 & 2" row floor mats (included with Interior $11400 Upgrade Package #65U)(16C) $ 2314 - 088 -067 2 nd Row Vinyl Seats in lieu of cloth 3 -$5400 -16 2314 -088 -068 Front Console Mounting Plate Delete (N /A with Cargo Wiring Upfit Pkg $0 00 $ 67G, Ready for the Road Pkg #67H, Ultimate Wiring Pkg #67U or Rear Console Plate -#85R )(85D 2314 - 088 -069 Cargo Storage Vault (includes lockable door)(N /A with Auxiliary Air- $21900 $ C onditioning #17A)(63V) 2314- 088 -070 Scuff Guards (protective wrap edging located on front edge of both rear $8200 $ d oors and top surface of rear bumper)(55D) 2314 - 088 -071 Noise Suppression Bonds (Ground Straps)(60R) $9000 $ 2314 - 088 -072 Airbag, Passenger Side Deactivation Switch(DLR) $25300 $ 2314 - 088 -073 Fire Extinguisher, 2 5# Dry Chemical ABC Rated w/ Mounting Bracket, $3800 $ umnstalled(DLR) 2314 - 088 -074 Flare Kit, 3 Piece Triangle with Storage Box for Roadside Emergency Use, $5100 $ uninstalled(DLR) 2314 - 088 -075 Keys, Set of Two Instead of Four (Deduct) (DLR) -$5 00 ($ 2314 - 088 -076 Door Panels, Rear Doors (TPO, Setina) (DLR) 3 $21800 65 2314 - 088 -077 Fire Extinguisher, 2 5# Dry Chemical ABC Rated w/ Mounting Bracket (DLR) $3800 $ 2314 - 088 -078 Flare Kit, 3 Piece Triangle w /Storage Box for Roadside Emergency Use (DLR) $5100 $ 2314 - 088 -079 Manuals, Service (CD) (DLR) 1 $22100 221 2314 - 088 -080 Mud Flaps, HD Plastic (Set of 4) (DLR) 3 $9000 27 2314 - 088 -081 Push Bumpers HD, Upgrade, fender, Describe (Setina PBS)(Fender Wraps) to 3 $36400 1,09 be ordered with Setina Push Bumpers) (DLR) 2314- 088 -082 Push Bumper, HD w/ Welded Upper Cross Support, Describe Setina PB400 $38800 $ (DLR) 2314 - 088 -083 Push Bumper, Lighted Pursuit, Front /Side Red /Blue LEDs, Describe Setina 3 $89500 $2.685 P134501.4 (DLR) Add cutout for opticom 2314 - 088 -084 Undercoating(DLR) 3 $9500 285 2314 - 088 -085 Window Barriers, Rear Doors, HD Steel Bars Setina)(Installed)(DLR) $17800 $ 2314 - 088 -086 Window Barriers, Rear Doors, Polycarbonate Panels (Setlna)(DLR) 3 $19500 585 2314- 088 -087 Partition, Front Horizontal with Sliding Polycarbonate Window, installed $59800 $ (Setina 1OVS)(DLR) Pricing & Ordering - Ford Interceptor Utility Page 4 of 5 PRICING & ORDERING CHECKLIST FORD INTERCEPTOR, UTILITY (CONT 2314 - 088 -088 Partition, Front Horizontal with Sliding Polycarbonate Window, Double $95500 $ Weapon System including lower recess extension panel, one standard shotgun lock, one adjustable universal lock with key override and imer)(installed)(Setina 1OVSRP /DWS)(DLR) 2314 - 088 -089 Partition, Front "XL" Upgrade with center and side recess panel (allows $10000 $ additional legroom for rear right -side passenger)(Only available with 1OVS o r 1OVSRP Partition )(Setina XL DLR 2314 - 088 -090 Partition, Rear Metal Mesh (installed)(Setina 12VS)(DLR) $41500 $ 2314 - 088 -091 Partition, Rear Polycarbonate Panel (installed)(Setina 12VS /P)(DLR) $44000 $ 2314 - 088 -092 Seat, AEDEC Rear Prisoner Transport with Center - Originating Seat $89S00 Belts(Includes rear partition with metal mesh)(factory seat shipped $ loose )(installed AED /CB DLR 2314 - 088 -093 Seat, AEDEC rear partition, polycarbonate upgrade installed over mesh $4000 $ ( Only available with AEDEC Rear Seat DLR 2314 - 088 -094 Seat, Setina HD TPO Rear Prisoner Transport Seat (installed over factory $568 00 $ eat)(Must order with Rear Partition 12VS or 12VS /P)(Setina SPT)(DLR) SUBTOTAL $ 2Q.767 + 8 3% SS $7,53366 TOTAL $98 Pricing & Ordering - Ford Interceptor Utility Page 5 of 5 FORD INTERCEPTOR POLICE PURSUIT UTILITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DESCRIPTION Ford Police Interceptor Utility AWD K8A /500A Highest Output Gas Engine (Minimum 280 HP) 3 7L V6 Gas 304HP (99R) 3 7L V6 Gas 304HP Automatic Transmission with First Gear Lockout and Highest Capacity Cooler FCY /STD Engine Oil Cooler FCY /STD Air Bags, Driver and Front Passenger FCY /STD Air Conditioning with High Speed Cut Out (CFC Free) FCY /STD Alternator 220 AMP Automatic Transmission and Highest Capacity Cooler (police calibrated) FCY /STD Auxiliary Power Points (2 on IP) Y FCY /STD Battery (750 CCA Min) 750 CCA Blind Spot Monitoring (BLIS) (Includes Heated Sideview Mirrors)(Requires Rearview Camera and SYNC) 55B/21B/53M Rearview Camera (video is displayed in rearview electrochromic mirror) FCY /21B SYNC Basic Voice - Activated Communications System (Includes single USB port and single auxiliary audio FCY /53M input hack) Cruise Control FCY /STD Electric Rear Window Defroster FCY /STD Electronic Stability Control, Traction Control FCY /STD Engine Idle Meter FCY /STD Engine Oil Cooler FCY /STD Factory Standard Police Package Equipment FCY /STD Floor Covering, HD Rubber FCY /STD Gauges, Water Temp, Fuel in Lieu of Warning Lights Fuel Temperature Equipment above, if any, that will not OEM factory installed None Factory Warranty 3/36 with 5/100 Powertrain Y 3/36 with 5/100 Powertrain Tire chain compatible as equipped above Yes Height Adjustable Front Seat Belts Included Yes Height Adjustable Driver's Seat Included Yes EPA Estimated MPG City 16 Hwy 21 Vehicle Emission Level Certification (CA) Tier2 Bm5 Mercury Content None NHTSA Crash Test Ratings (1 to 5 stars) Frontal, Driver 5, Passenger N /R, Side, Front 5, Rear N /R, Rollover 4 Frontal, Driver 5 Passenger NR Side, Front 5 Side, Rear NR Rollover 4 Days to deliver after receipt of order 60 TO 120 Starting Date of Model Year Production 08/13/2013 Standard Specifications - Ford Interceptor Utility Page 1 of 1 From Roy Runyon Sent Wednesday, February 19, 2014 4 08 PM To Cathy Johnson Cc City Council, Roy Runyon, Caroline Tompson Subject Agenda Items F, G , and H Vehicle Purchases Cathy, I have some questions related to the vehicle purchases under agenda items F , G , and H 1 How much of the $250K needed to purchase these vehicles for the Police and Parks Depts has actually been contributed into the ERR Fund (510) 2 If sufficient funds through previous contributions on behalf of the Police and Parks Depts currently don't exist in Fund 510, aren't we borrowing funds from the Public Works and utility contributed ERR funds? 3 If "yes" to question 2 , is there a policy that governs how and when funds shall be contributed into the ERR Fund and when vehicles may be purchased? Thanks, - -Roy i AGENDA BILL 61 CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT Purchase (for replacement) of Study Session Date 2/12/14 four (4) Detectives vehicles for Police COUNCIL MEETING Date 2/19/14 Department Department ERR Presenter Jim Orton Phone 473 -5359 SUMMARY The approved 2014 budget for ERR shows replacement of four (4) detectives vehicles within the Police Department These vehicles are a "carry over" from 2013 due to issues with the state contract in 2013 It is requested by the Police department that we replace these vehicles with Police rated 2014 Ford Interceptor We will be utilizing the 2014 Washington state contract dealer Columbia Ford of Longview Washington Total cost for these vehicles is $106,732 90 including Washington state sales tax All 4 replacement vehicles are scheduled to be removed from the fleet ATTACHMENTS 1) Copy of 2014 State Contract, 2) Specifications FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) Budgeted within the ERR fund 510 $106,732 90 STUDY SESSION AGENDA ® No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION O Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to approve the purchase of four (4) 2014 Ford Interceptor vehicles from Columbia Ford in the amount of $106,732 90 including Washington State sales tax and authorize the amendment to the 2014 budget for carryover of unspent funds from 2013 for this purchase COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 11/02/12 PRICING AND ORDERING CHECKLIST, POLICE PURSUIT SEDAN BASE VEHICLE ORDER CODE 12314-083-001 MAKE /MODEL Ford Interceptor (P2L) EXTERIOR COLORS Note Insert Quantity Next to Color Option Oxford White YZ 1 Sterling Grey Metallic UJ Ultra Blue LK Deep Impact Blue J4 i Medium Titanium Metallic YG Ebony Black UA Norsea Blue Metallic KR Kodiak Brown Metallic J1 1 Ingot Silver Metallic UX Silver Grey Metallic TN 1 Dark Toreador Red Metallic 1L Smokestone Metallic HG Light Ice Blue Metallic LS Light Grey TM Medium Brown Metallic BU Arizona Beige E3 Light Blue Metallic LN Royal Blue LM Dark Blue LK OPTION OPTION DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE EACH PRICE EXTENSION ORDER CODE 2314 - 083 -001 Base Vehicle, Ford Police Interceptor Sedan, Front -Wheel Drive (P2L) 4 $22,46300 $ 89,85 2314 - 083 -002 Credit for pickup from Dealer (Orders for Eastern Washington) _$13000 ($ (Deduct)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -003 Credit for pickup from Dealer (Orders for Western Washington) -$3000 ($ Deduct)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -004 AWD Model (Includes 3 7L V6 Ti -VCT, 305HP)( P2M/50OA/99K/44J) 4 $118100 $ 4,72 2314 - 083 -005 Alternative Engine (3 5L V6 EcoBoost)(148MPH Top Speed)(Only available $289100 $ w ith AWD)(99T /44C) 2314 - 083 -006 Special Service Package, Non - Pursuit Rated (Includes 2 OL 1 -4 EcoBoost w/ 6- $68500 $ Speed automatic transmission, active grill shutters, 200 —Amp alternator, quasi dual exhaust with chrome tips, unique front grille, P235/55Rx18 99H BSW all- season tires)(deletes deflector plate, engine oil cooler, auxiliary transmission oil cooler)(N /A with AWD or Alternative Engines)( 501A/999/ 46) 2314- 083 -007 Interior Upgrade Package (Includes cloth rear seats, 1st & 2nd row carpeting $34600 $ and floor mats, full floor console with cupholders, rear grab handles with oat hooks)(N /A with Trunk Upfit Package #854, Light Controller Package 855, Ready for the Road Package #856, Ultimate Wiring Package #857 or Rear Console Plate #97D)(12P) 2314 - 083 -008 Front Headlamp (Housing Only)(Includes pre - drilled hole for side marker $11000 $ police use, does not include LED installed lights, pre - molded side warning LED holes with standard twist lock sealed capability -does not include LED installed lights)(N /A with Front Headlamp Lighting Solution #661 or Ready or the Road Package #856)(13P) 2314- 083 -009 Front Headlamp Lighting Solution (Includes base projector beam headlamp 4 $86200 $ 3,44 plus two (2) multi- function Park/Turn /Warn bulbs for wig -wag simulation, and two (2) white hemispheric lighthead LED side warning lights Wiring, LED lights included Controller "not" included )(Includes Pre - Wiring for grille LED lights, siren and speaker #51G)(Included with Ready for the Road Package #856)(661/51G) 2314 - 083 -010 Tail Lamp Lighting Solution (Includes base Led LED lights, plus two (2) rear $37900 $ integrated hemispheric red lighthead LED side warning lights in taillamps LED lights only Wiring, contgroller "not' included)(Included with Ready for he Road Package #856)(662) Pricing & Ordering Ford Interceptor Sedan Page 1 of 5 PRICING AND ORDERING CHECKLIST POLICE PURSUIT SEDAN (CONT ) 2314- 083 -013 Rear Lighting Solution [Includes two (2) backlit flashing linear high - intensity $43300 $ LED lights (driver side red /passenger side blue) mounted inside back endow, surrounds brake stoplight Also includes two (2) linear high - intensity LED lights (driver side red /passenger side blue) mounted on inside trunk deckled, activates when deckled is open LED lights only Wiring, controller "not' included ) (Included with Ready for the Road Package 856)(663) 2314 - 083 -012 Trunk Upfit Package [Includes Rear Console Mounting Plate #97D„ wiring $65100 $ overlay harness with lighting and siren interface connections, Vehicle Engine Harness two(2) light connectors — supports up to three (3) LED lights each (engine compartment), one (2) grille LED light connector — supports two (2) LED lights, two (2) 50 -amp battery ground circuits in power distribution Junction block (in- trunk), one (1) 10 -amp siren /speaker circuit (engine to trunk), trunk circulation fan #97T, trunk electronics tray #62D, pre - wiring for grille LEDs and siren /speaker #51G)(Does not include LED lights and controller)(Recommend Police Wiring Harness Kits #77E and 1J)(854) 2314 - 083 -013 Light Controller Package [Includes content from Trunk Upfit Package #854, $146100 $ plus Whelen Light Controller Head (PCC84), Whelen PCC811 Light Relay Center (electronics tray mounted), Light Controller /Relay Center Wiring (Jumper harness), Whelen Specific Cable (console to trunk) connects PCC811 to Control Head)(Does not include LED lights)(Recommend Police Wire Harness Connector Kits #77E and 511)(855) 2314 -083 -014 Ready for the Road Package [Includes Packages #661, #662, #663, #854, $325000 $ Plus Whelen Cencom Light Controller Head with dimmable backlight, Whelen Cencom Relay Center /Siren /Amp with Traffic Advisor (mounted on Electronics Tray), Light Controller /Relay Cencom Wiring (wiring harness) with additional input /output pigtails, high current pigtail, Whelen Specific ECAN Cable (console to trunk) connects Cencom to Control Head, Grille linear LED lights (Red /Blue), 100 -Watt Siren /Speaker #96P, Trunk Storage Vault #19T, Hidden Door -Lock Plunger /Rear -Door Handles Inoperable #63P, Wiring Harness with two (2) 50 -amp battery and ground circuits in runk](N /A with Light Controller Package #855)(856) 2314- 083 -015 Ultimate Wiring Package [Includes Rear Console Mounting Plate #97D, Grille $49200 $ LED Lights /Siren /Speaker Wiring #51G, Plus I/P to Trunk Overlay Harness wo (2) light cables — supports up to 6 LED lights (engine compartment), trunk power distribution box (PDB) , two (2) 50 -amp battery and ground circuits in trunk, one (1) 10 -amp siren /speaker circuit engine to trunk, Rear backlight /decklid/trunk wiring — supports up to six (6) rear LED lights, Light controller/relay cencom wiring (wiring harness) with additional input /output pigtails, Does not include LED light side connectors] (Recommend Police Wire Harness Connector Kits #77E and #51J)(N /A with Trunk Upfit Pkg #854, Light Controller Pkg #855 or Ready for the Road Pkg 856)(857) 2314- 083 -016 Police Wire Harness Connector Kit — Front (For connectivity to Ford PI $9500 $ Package Solutions) (includes two (2) made 4 -pin connectors for siren, five (5) female 4 -pin connectors for lighting/siren /speaker, one (1) 4 -pin IP connector for seakers, one (1) 4 -pin IP connector for siren controller connectivity, one (1) 8 -pin sealed connector, one (1) 14 -pm IP onnector)(77E) Pricing & Ordering Ford Interceptor Sedan Page 2 of 5 PRICING and ORDERING CHECKLIST Police Pursuit Sedan (Cont ) 2314 -083 -017 Police Wire Harness Connector Kit — Rear (For connectivity to Ford PI $12000 $ Package Solutions)(Includes one (1) 2 -pin connector for rear lighting, one (1) 2 -pin connector for trunk circulation fan, six (6) female 4 -pin connectors, six (6) male 4 -pin connectors, one (1) 10 -pin connector)(51J) 2314 - 083 -018 Interior Upgrade Package (Full carpeting, carpeted floor mats, full floor $34600 $ c onsole, rear grab handles)(retams column shifter)(12P) 2314 - 083 -019 Rear Console Plate (wiring conduit from front console plate to rear 4 $3200 128 eat)(97D) 2314 - 083 -020 Pre - Wiring for grille LED lights, siren and speaker(51G) $4800 $ 2314 -083 -021 100 -Watt Siren /Speaker (includes bracket and pigtail)(96P) $26500 $ 2314 - 083 -022 Trunk Release Button, Battery Powered (switch is hot at all times)(62B) $2600 $ 2314 - 083 -023 Dark Car Feature (courtesy lamps disabled when any door is opened)(13C) $2000 $ 2314 - 083 -024 Doors /Locks, rear door handles inoperable /locks operable(18L) $3200 $ 2314 - 083 -025 Doors /Locks, rear door handles inoperable /locks inoperable(18G) $3200 $ 2314 - 083 -026 Doors /Locks, hidden door lock plunger with rear door handles $12300 $ operable(63B) 2314 - 083 -027 Doors /Locks, hidden door lock plunger with rear door handles inoperable $14200 $ (included with Ready for the Road Package #856)(63P) 2314- 083 -028 Windows, rear window power delete, operable only from front driver side $2200 $ witches(67D) 2314 - 083 -029 Ballistic Door Panel - Driver only(65E) $1,41100 $ 2314 - 083 -030 Ballistic Door Panels - Driver & Passenger Front Door(65C) $2,81800 $ 2314 - 083 -031 Cap, Locking Gas(98K) $2000 $ 2314- 083 -032 Daytime Running Lights(942) $4700 $ 2314- 083 -033 Heater, Engine Block(41H) $3200 $ 2314 - 083 -034 Reverse Sensing System(76R) $27000 $ 2314 -083 -035 Rearview Camera (Camera displayed in rear view electrochromic $21800 $ mirror)(77B) 2314 - 083 -036 SYNC Basic Voice - Activated Communication System (includes single USB $27000 $ port and single auxiliary audio input Jack)(Must order Reverse Sensing S ystem #76R)(53M) 2314 - 083 -037 Remappable (4) switches on steering wheel(47J /47K) $13800 $ 2314- 083 -038 BLIS Blind Spot Monitoring with Cross - traffic Alert (includes manual fold- $43300 $ a way heated mirrors )(556 2314 - 083 -039 Mirrors, Heated Sidewew (included with BLIS #55B)(549) $5600 $ 2314- 083 -040 Universal Keyed Fleet (All vehicles keyed alike) (Dealer to Call Purchaser for 4 $4500 180 Key Code)(KEY) 2314 -083 -041 Perimeter Anti -Theft Alarm (activated by the opening of Hood, Door or $34500 $ Decklid)(Includes Remote Keyless Entry Key Fob)(59B /60P) 2314 - 083 -042 Remote Keyless Entry Key Fob (does NOT include keypad)(N /A with Fleet $23300 $ Keyed Alike )(60P 2314 - 083 -043 Electronics Tray (without Trunk Fan)(62D) $21800 $ 2314 - 083 -044 Trunk Circulation Fan (mounted inside trunk)(does not include wire $5600 $ harness)(97T) 2314 - 083 -045 Trunk Storage Vault (includes lockable door)(19T) $11500 $ 2314 - 083 -046 Scuff Guards (protective wrap edging located on front edge of both rear $4800 $ oors)(59E) 2314 - 083 -047 2nd Row Vinyl Seats (in lieu of cloth)(D88C) -($5400) $ Pricing & Ordering Ford Interceptor Sedan Page 3 of 5 PRICING and ORDERING CHECKLIST Police Pursuit Sedan (Cont ) 2314 - 083 -048 Carpeting in Lieu of Rubber Floor Covering (includes front & rear carpeted $11400 $ floor mats)(included with Interior Upgrade Package #12P)(171) 2314 - 083 -049 Side Marker LED Fender Lights(96E) $20600 $ 2314 - 083 -050 Spotlights, 6 ", Clear Lens, Pillar Mounted Left (Including Prep Package) $18200 $ (Reinforced A Pillar) (Factory) (Incandescent Bulb)(21D) 2314 - 083 -051 Spotlight, 6 ", Clear Lens, Pillar Mounted DUAL (L &R) (Including Prep $33400 $ Package) (Reinforced A Pillar) (Factory) (Incandescent Bulbs)(21P) 2314 - 083 -052 Spot Lamp, LED Bulb, Driver Only (Unity)(21L $31000 $ 2314 - 083 -053 Spot Lamp, LED Bulb, Driver Only (Whelen)(21F) $33000 $ 2314 - 083 -054 Spot Lamps, LED Bulbs, Dual (Urnty)(21B) $55000 $ 2314 - 083 -055 Spot Lamps, LED Bulbs, Dual (Whelen)(21G) $59300 $ 2314 - 083 -056 Badge Delete ( "Police Interceptor" or "Special Service Police" Badge 4 N/ nly)(19D) 2314 - 083 -057 Two-Tone Vinyl Package #1 (Includes White Vinyl Roof, RH /LH Front Doors, $74700 $ RH /LH Rear Doors)(141) 2314 - 083 -058 Two-Tone Vinyl Package #2 (Includes White Vinyl Roof, Hood, Decklid)(142) $74700 $ 2314 - 083 -059 Two-Tone Vinyl Package #3 (Includes White Vinyl Roof, RH /LH Front Doors $62800 $ nl 143 2314 - 083 -060 Two-Tone Vinyl Roof, White Only(148) $37800 $ 2314 - 083 -061 Two-Tone Vinyl RH /LH Doors, White Only(149) $26900 $ 2314 - 083 -062 Vinyl Word Wrap "POLICE ", Non - reflective, white lettering located on $70600 $ LH /RH sides of vehicle(144) 2314 - 083 -063 Vinyl Word Wrap "POLICE ", Reflective, white lettering located on LH /RH $70600 $ ides of vehicle 146 2314 - 083 -064 Vinyl Word Wrap "POLICE ", Reflective, black lettering located on LH /RH $70600 $ sides of vehicle(1451 2314 - 083 -065 Vinyl Word Wrap "SHERIFF ", Non - reflective, white lettering located on $70600 $ LH/RH sides of vehicle(147) 2314 - 083 -066 Wheel Covers, 18" Full Face Wheel Cover)(N /A with 18" Painted Aluminum $6000 $ Wheel #642)(65L) 2314 - 083 -067 18" Painted Aluminum Wheel (Spare wheel is an 18" conventional police $42500 $ black steel wheel )(642 2314 - 083 -068 Spare Wheel, Additional (No Tire)(DLR) $30500 $ 2314 - 083 -069 Keys Set of 2 Instead of 4 (Deduct)(DLR) -$500 $ 2314 - 083 -070 Manuals, Service (cd)(DLR) i $22100 221 2314 - 083 -071 Air Bag, Passenger Side Deactivation Switch(DLR) $23500 $ 2314 - 083 -072 Mud Flaps, HD Plastic (Set of 4)(DLR) $9000 $ 2314 - 083 -073 Undercoating (Factory Approved)(DLR) $9500 $ 2314 - 083 -074 Door Panels, interior rear doors, covers locks and handles (Setina TPO) $21800 $ 2314 - 083 -075 Partition, Front Horizontal with Polycarbonate Sliding Window and Full $59800 $ Lower Extension Panel, installed (Setina 10S)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -076 Partition, Double Weapon Mounting System (includes Front Horizontal $94500 $ Partition with Polycarbonate Sliding Window, Lower Recess Extension Panel, one (1) standard shotgun lock, one (1) adjustable universal lock, including key override and timer), installed (Setina IORP /DWS)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -077 Partition, "XL" Upgrade with center and side recess panel (allows additional $10000 $ legroom for rear right -side passenger)(Only available with 10S or 10RP /DWS Partitions )(Setina 1ORPXL DLR Pricing & Ordering Ford Interceptor Sedan Page 4 of 5 PRICING and ORDERING CHECKLIST Police Pursuit Sedan (Cont ) 2314 - 083 -078 Vehicle Push Bumpers 12" HD Aluminum, Set 2 (Installed) (Setina PB200) $28900 $ (DLR) 2314 - 083 -079 Vehicle Push Bumpers 16" HD Aluminum, Set 2 (Installed) (Setina $30200 $ PB200)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -080 Vehicle Push Bumpers HD with Bolted oval upper cross support (Setina $33500 $ PB300 )(DLR 2314 - 083 -081 Vehicle Push Bumpers HD with Welded oval cross support (Setina $34800 $ PB400 )(DLR 2314 - 083 -082 Vehicle Push Bumper, Lighted Pursuit, Front /Side Red /Blue LEDs, installed $70500 $ (Setina PB450L4)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -083 Vehicle Push Bumpers Upgrade Fender Protectors when ordered with one $35400 $ of the above (Setina PB5)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -084 Window Barriers, Rear Doors, Polycarbonate Slotted Panels, untinted, $18800 $ installed (Setina WDW /P)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -085 Window Barriers, Rear Doors, Steel Bars, installed (Setina WDW /S)(DLR) $17200 $ 2314 - 083 -086 Seat Rear AEDEC Prostraint (Factory Seat and Seat Belts Loose in Trunk) $48500 $ (Includes center - originating seat belts)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -087 Rear Prisoner Transport Seat, installed over factory seat (Setina $56800 $ PT /TPO)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -088 Stock Vehicle Upcharge, Dealer Stock Vehicle with all contract required $25000 $ equipment, Color White, delivery 7 Days (See Special Instructions, Stock ehicles)(DLR) 2314 - 083 -089 Delayed Warranty Start (customer submits request at $000 $ ww fordwsd com )(DLR) SUBTOTAL $ 98553 SS $ 8 , 17990 TOTAL $ 106 90 Pricing & Ordering Ford Interceptor Sedan Page 5 of 5 FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR, HIGH SPEED PURSUIT SEDAN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS & ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DESCRIPTION Ford Police Interceptor 4 -Door Sedan FWD (Front -Wheel Drive) P2L /500A C lender Gas Engine (Minimum 280HP 3 5L V6 Gas 288HP Automatic Transmission with First Gear Lockout and Highest Capacity Cooler FCY /STD Engine Oil Cooler FCY /STD Air Bags, Driver and Front Passenger FCY /STD Electronic Stability Control, Traction Control FCY /STD Air Conditioning with High Speed Cut Out (CFC Free) FCY /STD Tinted Glass All Around FCY /STD Police Special Speed Rated 18 inch Tires (specify brand, size) P245/55Rx18 BSW Matching Full Size Spare Tire and Wheel FCY /STD Power Door Locks FCY /STD Power Mirrors FCY /STD Power Windows with Passenger Lockout Switch FCY /STD Power Steering FCY /STD Tilt Steering Wheel FCY /STD Heavy Duty Power Brakes, Anti -Lock Braking System FCY /STD 750 CCA Battery (Min) 750 CCA 160 AMP Alternator (Min) 220 AMP Electric Rear Window Defroster FCY /STD Heavy Duty Police Suspension FCY /STD Heavy Duty Cloth Front Buckets, With Weapon Cutouts, Cloth Rear Bench Seat with HD Seat Cushions FCY /STD Power Driver's Seat FCY /STD Power Adjustable Pedals FCY /STD Power Distribution Box, Front FCY /STD Dome Lamp, Independently Switched, White and LED Red Lamp FCY /STD Engine Hour Meter FCY /STD Full floor Covering (vinyl or carpet) FCY /STD -VINYL Headliner, Removable with Dual Beam Map Light FCY /STD Heavy Duty Police Suspension FCY /STD Heavy Duty Cloth Front Buckets, With Weapon Cutouts, Cloth Rear Bench Seat with HD Seat Cushions Vinyl Headlamps on Warning Buzzer /Chime FCY /STD Heavy Duty Cooling, Coolant Recovery System FCY /STD Power Police Pigtail FCY /STD Radio Prewire (2 Way Radio Connection to Front Speakers) FCY /STD Tire Pressure Monitoring System FCY /STD Trunk Release, Electric, Inside, Left Door and Instrument Panel Mounted, Ignition Controlled instead of FCY /STD battery Wheel covers, hubcaps instead of full (set of 4) FCY /STD Inside Hood Release FCY /STD Inside Trunk emergency Release FCY /STD Intermittent Wipers FCY /STD Keys, Set of 4, Random Code Single Key Lock System FCY /STD Stereo, Factory Installed AM /FM /CD /MP3 FCY /STD Radio Suppression Package FCY /STD Intermittent Wipers FCY /STD Gauges in Lieu of Warning Lights (factory) (identify) FCY /STD Cruise Control FCY /STD Standard Specifications Ford Interceptor Sedan Page 1 of 2 FORD INTERCEPTOR, HIGH SPEED PURSUIT SEDAN STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS & ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DESCRIPTION Cigarette Lighter or Auxiliary Power Source, Rear Power Point (rear power point= N /A)(2 on front I /P) FCY /STD 131 MPH Certified Speedometer FCY /STD Factory Standard Police Package Equipment FCY /STD Factory Warranty 3/36 with 5/100 Powertrain Tire chain compatible as equipped above NO Height Adjustable Front Seat Belts Included YES Height Adjustable Front Seat Belts Included Yes Height Adjustable Driver's Seat Included Yes EPA Estimated MPG City 18 Hwy 26 City 18 Hwy 26 Vehicle Emission Level Certification (CA) Tier 2 Bin 5 Tier 2 /Bin 5 Mercury Content NONE None NHTSA Crash Test Ratings Frontal, Driver 5, Passenger N /R, Side, Front 5, Rear NR, Rollover 4 Frontal, Driver 5 Passenger NR Side, Front 5 Side, Rear NR Rollover 4 Days to deliver after receipt of order 60 TO 120 Starting Date of Model Year Production 06/03/2013 Standard Specifications Ford Interceptor Sedan Page 2 of 2 AGENDA BILL 614 CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee■ SUBJECT Purchase (for replacement) of Study Session Date 2/12/14 two (2) Parks trucks COUNCIL MEETING Date 2/19/14 Department ERR Presenter Jim Orton Phone 473 -5359 SUMMARY The approved 2014 budget for ERR shows replacement of two (2) Parks department pickup trucks Both of these trucks have met their anticipated life and are due for replacement It is requested that we purchase one (1) Ford F250 4X2 Extended cab and one (1) Dodge Ram 1500 4X2 Extended cab These will be purchase utilizing Washington state contracts The authorized Ford dealership is Legacy Ford of Pasco Washington for a total of $25,512 31 including Washington state sales tax The authorized Dodge dealer is Bud Clary Chrysler Dodge of Longview Washington for a total cost of 23,481 61 for a grand total of $48,993 92 including Washington state sales tax ATTACHMENTS 1) Washington state contract for Ford, 2) Ford Specifications 3) Washington state contract for Dodge, 4) Dodge Specifications FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) Funding available thru the ERR fund 510 for a total of $48,993 92 STUDY SESSION AGENDA ® No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION ® Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to authorize the purchase of two (2) Pickup trucks for Parks department for the total amount of $48,993 92 including Washington state sales tax COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 11/02/12 PRICING AND ORDERING CHECKLIST F250 2WD EXTENDED CAB Ingot Silver Metallic Tuxedo Black Metallic 1 Oxford White 314 -120 -001, Extended Cab — F250 (X2A) Pale Adobe Metallic Sterling Gray Metallic Vermillion Red Note Insert Quantity Next to Color option Blue Jeans Metallic Green Gem Metallic OPTION OPTION DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE EACH PRICE EXTENSION ORDER CODE 2314 - 120 -001 %Ton Pickup (2WD), Extended Cab 1 $22,89200 22,892 2314 - 120 -002 Credit for pickup from Dealer (Orders for Eastern Washington) (Deduct) -$7500 ($ 2314 - 120 -003 Credit for pickup from Dealer (Orders for Western Washington) (Deduct) -$7500 ($ 2314 - 120 -004 Air Bags, Side Impact (STD) $000 $ 2314 - 120 -005 Air Conditioning Delete (Deduct) (D572) -$68000 ($ 2314 - 120 -006 Alternative Gas Engines $7,15800 $ 7L V8 Diesel (99T) 2314 - 120 -007 Alternative Engine Warranty Information, please describe DIESEL ENGINE WARRANTY IS 100,000 MILES GAS ENGINE WARRANTY IS 60,000 MILES UNLESS STATED DIFFERENTLY ALL PREP ENGINES ARE 60,000 MILES W ARRANTY (STD) $000 $ 2314 - 120 -008 Alternator, HD 200 AMP (Maximum) (67D) $6400 $ 2314 -120 -009 Alternative Seating (Specify type and trim material) (e g bucket seats) CLOTH SEATS 40/20/40 (1S) $10000 $ VINYL 40 /CONSOLE /40 SEAT (LS) $35500 $ CLOTH 40 /CONSOLE /40 SEAT (2S) $43800 $ 2314 -120 -010 Battery, HD 850 CCA (DLR) $14000 $ 2314 - 120 -011 Bedlmer, Spray On (Over the Rails and Tailgate) (MFR Linex, Rhino, or 325 e qual) (DLR) 1 $32500 2314 - 120 -012 Bed Mat, HD Rubber (DLR) $13000 $ 2314 - 120 -013 Cab and Chassis, Pickup Box Delete (No Trader Hitch Receiver) (Identify any Additional Equipment Deletions, Changes)(Factory Only- Incomplete Vehicle Tag) (Deduct) 10,000# GVW ON F350 SRW 9900# GVW ON F250 (66D) -$53300 ($ 2314 - 120 -014 Cab Steps (18B) $31600 $ 2314 - 120 -015 Clearance Lights, Roof (592) $4800 $ 2314 - 120 -016 Cruise Control (525) $20000 $ 2314 - 120 -017 Daytime Running Lights (942) $36 00 /PR $ 2314 - 120 -018 Differential, Limited Slip (Available With Rear Axle Ratios 3J LS F250/F350 3 55 6 7L DIESEL (X3E) $29600 $ 3E LS F250/F350 3 73 6 2L GAS X4M 4 30 6 2L GAS (X4M) $29600 $ 2314 - 120 -019 Dual Alternators 57 AMP REQUIRES 6 71. DIESEL ENGINE 99T 357 AMPS (67A) $3240 $ 2314 - 120 -020 GVWR Increase 10500 # FOR REG CAB 10800# FOR EXTENDED CAB 11,000# FOR CREW CAB (Identify Equipment changes) (X3A) $1,23100 $ 2314 - 120 -021 GVWR, Maximum 14000 # (1 Ton Dual Rear Wheels)(Identify all upgrades, Tire size and Load range) LT245/751117E BSW AS TBK 3C= 13,800# $1,4910 $ 2314 - 120 -022 Heater, Engine Block (41H) $7700 $ 2314 - 120 -023 Keys, Set of 2 Instead of 4 (Deduct) (DLR) -$20 00 /P ($ 2314 - 120 -024 Manuals, Service (Paper or CD) (DLR) 1 $27500 275 Pncing & Ordenng for Ford F250 Extended Cab 2WD Page 1 of 3 PRICING AND ORDERING CHECKLIST, FORD %TON 2WD (FORD), EXTENDED CAB(CONT ) 2314 - 120 -025 Mirrors, Alternative (Telescoping Trailer Tow)(Identify type, size, finish) T ELESCOPING BLACK TO MIRRORS W MANUAL GLASS (STD) $000 $ 2314 - 120 -026 Mud Flaps, Rear (DLR) $7900 $ 2314 - 120 -027 Power Adjustable Pedals $000 $ 2314 - 120 -028 Power Group Delete (Deduct) -$76300 ($ 2314 - 120 -029 Rear Axle Ratios, Alternatives 313 316 7L DIESEL 4X4/4X2 37 3 73 6 2L GAS (FCY) $000 $ 2314 - 120 -030 Rear Storage Bin $000 $ 2314 - 120 -031 Reverse Sensing System, SENSOR NOT AVAIL WITH 66D BOX DELETE OR 3T DIESEL IDLE SHUTDOWN DELETE (76R) $20800 $ 2314 - 120 -032 eating Alternative, Cloth Bucket Seats 40 /Console 40 (US) $000 $ 2314 - 120 -033 eat, cloth trim instead of vinyl (1S) $8500 $ 2314 - 120 -034 hort Bed (Identify Additional Equipment Changes /Restrictions) (Deduct) Extended Cab 6 5' bed (142" WB) -$18500 ($ 2314 -120 -035 Special Paint, Single Color, Monotone (DLR) $54500 $ 2314 - 120 -036 Special Paint, (Fish & Wildlife ONLY) Pale Adobe (LQ) $000 $ 2314 - 120 -037 Spotlight, 6 ", Clear Lens, Pillar Mounted, Left (DLR) $46500 $ 2314 -120 -038 Stock vehicle upcharge, dealer stock vehicle with all contract required equipment, color white, delivery 7 days (See Special Instructions, Stock V ehicles) (DLR) $25000 $ 2314 - 120 -039 Stability Control System, Electric ADVANCE TRAC W ROLL STABILITY C ONTROL (FCY /STD) $000 $ 2314 - 120 -040 Stereo, AM /FM /CD (585) $23400 $ 2314 - 120 -041 Stock vehicle Upcharge, dealer stock vehicle with all contract required e quipment, color white, delivery 7 days $25000 $ 2314 - 120 -042 Suspension Package HEAVY SERVICE FRONT SUSPENSION PKG INCLUDES HEAVY SERVICE FRONT SPRINGS MAY DETERIORATE RIDE Q UALITY RIDE HEIGHT MAY DECREASE (67H) $10700 $ 2314 - 120 -043 Tilt Steering Wheel (STD) $000 $ 2314 - 120 -044 Tow Hooks, Front (STD) 1 $000 000 2314 - 120 -045 Towing Package Delete (Deduct) -$000 ($ 2314 - 120 -046 Trailer Brake Controller (52B) $18300 $ 2314 - 120 -047 Undercoating (DLR) $18500 $ 2314 - 120 -048 UpFitter Switches, Describe Dealer or Factory FACTORY REQUIRES 67D HD $10000 $ ALTERNATOR OR 67A DUAL ALTERNATORS 2314 - 120 -049 Window, Sliding Rear (433) $12700 $ 2314 - 120 -050 Alternative Fuel Vehicle, Diesel, Biodiesel Engine (Min B20 Biodiesel Certified), Propane, CNG with all contract required (See special instructions- Alternative Fuel, Hybrid, Biodiesel Vehicles) NG SYSTEM WITH 98F PREP ENGINE BIFUEL SYSTEM 6 21. ENGINE INCLUDES 98F PREP ENGINE INCLUDES 18 4 GGE TANK QVM INSTALLED (DLR) $9,51800 $ DEDICATED PROPANE SYSTEM WITH 98F PREP ENGINE IN BED TANK 21. ENGINE INCLUDES 98F PREP ENGINE AND 38 GALLON IN BED PROPANE TANK QVM INSTALLED (DLR) $10,46300 $ DEDICATED PROPANE SYSTEM WITH 98R PREP ENGINE UNDERBED TANK 6 2L ENGINE INCLUDES 98F PREP ENGINE (DLR) $11,46300 $ Pncmg & Ordenng for Ford F250 Extended Cab 2WD Page 2 of 3 I FORD PREP ENGINE WITH HARDENED VALUES AND HEAD FOR CNG OR LPG 1 $268001 $ PRICING AND ORDERING CHECKLIST, FORD % TON 2WD (FORD), EXTENDED CAB(CONT ) OTHER RECOMMENDED OPTIONS 2314 - 120 -051 Engine Idle Shutdown Delete (For Emergency Vehicles ) (Diesel Only) (Deduct) (63T) -$20000 ($ 2314- 120 -052 Pickup Box Delete (66D) $48300 $ 2314 - 120 -053 EXTRA HEAVY SERVICE SUSPENSION PACKAGE FOR PU BOX DELETE (67X) $10700 $ 2314 - 120 -054 PPERATOR CONTROLLED REGENERATION (OCR) DIESEL (98R) $22400 $ SUBTOTAL $ 23 492 +86%SST $202031 TOTAL $25,S1231 Pncmg & Ordenng for Ford F250 Extended Cab 2WD Page 3 of 3 FORD % TON 2WD STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Ford F250 Ford F250 Ford F250 DESCRIPTION Regular Cab 2WD Extended Cab 2WD Crew Cab 2WD (2314- 119 -001) (2314- 120 -001) (2314- 121 -001) , r , GVWR (8600# Minimum) 10,000# 10,000# 10,000# Engine (Minimum 5 4L V8) 6 2L V8 6 2L V8 6 2L V8 Box Length 8 Ft 8 Ft 8 Ft Air Bags, Driver and Front Passenger FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Air Conditioning FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Alternator (Minimum 130AMP) 157 AMP 157 AMP 157 AMP Battery (Minimum 600 CCA) r 650 CCA 650 CCA 650 CCA r Brakes, HD Power 4 Wheel, Anti - Locking System FCY /STD FCY /STD L FCY /STD Bumper, HD Rear Step FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Cigarette Lighter or Auxiliary Power Source FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD r Cruise Control/Tilt Steering Wheel FCY /STD FCY /STD L FCY /STD Dome Light FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Door Trim Panels FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD , r , Floor Covering, Vinyl FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Fuel Capacity 36 Gallon 36 Gallon 36 Gallon Gauges In Lieu of Warning Lights (FCY) Speedometer, Tachometer, FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Fuel, Oil Pressure, Coolant temp, Amp r Glass, Tinted All Around L FCY /STD FCY /STD L FCY /STD L Headliner, Non Metallic FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Keys, Four (4) Set of Exterior Keyed Door Locks, Driver & Front DLR DLR DLR Passenger Doors, or Remote Keyless Entry w/ 2 Fobs Mirrors, Manufacturer's Standard Exterior Mirrors, L & R FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Power Group (Windows, Door Locks, Mirrors) FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Radio, AM /FM (Factory Installed) FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD r Rear Axle Ratio L 373 373 L 373 Seating, Head Restraint Type, Vinyl or Cloth Front Bench Folding FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Spare Tire Carrier, Jack, Lug Wrench Full size conventional spare FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD r Steering, Power FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Tires, Steel Belted Radial, On -Off Road or All Terrain Tread, FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Matching Full Size Spare Tire and Wheel Transmission, Automatic FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Wipers, Intermittent FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Factory Warranty 3 year /36,000 3 year /36,000 3 year /36,000 5 year /60,000 5 year /60,000 5 year /60,000 , r , Equipment above, if any, that will not be OEM factory None None None installed r r r Ground Clearance 8 5" 8 5" 8 5" Tire chain compatible as equipped above Yes /Chains Yes /Chains Yes /Chains Mercury Content, If Any, In Vehicle None None None Vehicle Emission Level Certification (CA) 50 State (NAS) 50 State (NAS) 50 State (NAS) , EPA Estimated MPG as equipped above None None None NHTSA Crash Test Ratings (1 to 5 stars) Frontal N/A Frontal N/A Frontal N/A Passenger N/A Passenger N/A Passenger N/A Side /Front N/A Side /Front N/A Side /Front N/A Side /Rear N/A Side /Rear N/A Side /Rear N/A Rollover N/A Rollover N/A Rollover N/A Standard Specifications Ford F250 2WD Page 1 of 2 FORD F250 % TON 2WD STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED) Days to Deliver after receipt of order 90 to 120 90 to 120 90 to 120 Starting Date of Model Year Production 07/15/2013 07/15/2013 07/15/2013 Standard Specifications Ford F250 2WD Page 2 of 2 PRICING AND ORDERING CHECKLIST RAM 1500 2WD EXTENDED CAB 314- 114 -001, Extended Cab — Dodge Bright Silver Metallic Blue Streak Pearl Black Clear Ram 1500 (DSiL41) Bright White Clear Black God Pearl Deep Cherry Red Note Insert Quantity Next to Color Option Granite Crystal Metallic Clear Flame Red Clear Crystal Pearl Western Brown Maximum Steel Prairie Pearl Metallic Clear True Blue Pearl ORDER CODE OPTION DESCRIPTION CITY PRICE EACH PRICE EXTENSION 2314 - 114 -001 Z Ton Pickup (2WD), Extended Cab 1 $19,98700 19.98 2314 - 114 -002 Credit for pickup from Dealer (Orders for Eastern Washington) (Deduct) -$1000 ($ 2314 -114 -003 Credit for pickup from Dealer (Orders for Western Washington) (Deduct) -$10000 ($ 2314 - 114 -004 Alternative Gas Engines (3 5L V6, Extended Cab)(ERB) $62500 $ 2314 - 114 -005 Bedliner, Spray On (Over the Rails and Tailgate) (XM9) 1 $27500 275 2314 - 114 -006 Bed Mat, HD Rubber (DLR) $14500 $ 2314 - 114 -007 Daytime Running Lights (LMK) $35 00 /pr $ 2314 - 114 -008 Differential, Limited Slip(DSA) $28000 $ 2314 - 114 -009 Heater, Engine Block (NKH) $8500 $ 2314 - 114 -010 Keys, Set of 2 Instead of 4 (Deduct) -$200 00 /p ($ 2314 - 114 -011 Manuals, Service (Tech Connect) (DLR) i $000 $ 0 2314 - 114 -012 Mats, Rubber Floor (DLR) $13500 $ 2314 - 114 -013 Mirrors, Camper Style(GPG) $15500 $ 2314 - 114 -014 Mud Flaps, Front & Rear (DLR) $16000 $ 2314 - 114 -015 Power Group Delete (Deduct)(AJIi) -$60000 ($ 2314 - 114 -016 Rear Axle Ratios, 3 92( Available ONLY with V8 3 55 with the V6) (DMH) $5000 $ 2314 - 114 -017 Reverse Sensing System, Ultrasonic Sensors (XAA) $21500 $ 2314 - 114 -018 I(quipment, at, cloth trim instead of vinyl(Extended or Crew Cab)(AJY) $43000 $ 2314 - 114 -019 otlight, 6 ", Clear Lens, Pillar Mounted, Left (DLR) $42500 $ 2314 - 114 -020 ereo, AM /FM /CD (RH1) $17000 $ 2314 - 114 -021 ock vehicle Upcharge, dealer stock vehicle with all contract required $25000 $ color white, delivery 7 days (DLR) 2314 - 114 -022 Tires On -Off Road (Set of 5) (LT265 /70RE) (TXN) $215 00 /se $ 2314 - 114 -023 Towing Package, Heavy Duty (Receiver Hitch and 7 PIN Connector)(XF8) i $85000 850 2314 - 114 -024 Warranty, Delayed Start $000 $ 2314 - 114 -025 UN Connect (Bluetooth Compatibility)(RA2) i $57000 57 SUBTOTAL $21 +83 %SS $1 799 61 TOTAL] $ 23 481 61 Pncmg & Ordenng for Dodge Ram 1500 Extended Cab 2WD Page 1 of 1 CHRYSLER/DODGE % TON 2WD STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Dodge Ram 1500 Dodge Ram 1500 Dodge Ram 1500 DESCRIPTION Regular Cab 2WD Extended Cab 2WD Crew Cab 2WD (DS1L62) (DS11_41) (DS11_91)) r GVWR (6000# Minimum) F 6,600# 6,700# r 6,700# Engine (Minimum 3 6L V6) 5 7L V8 5 7L V8 5 7L V8 Box Length 8 Ft 8 Ft 8 Ft Air Bags, Driver and Front Passenger FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Air Conditioning FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Alternator (Minimum 100AMP) 180 AMP 180 AMP 180 AMP Battery (Minimum 600 CCA) 730 CCA 730 CCA r 730 CCA r Brakes, HD Power 4 Wheel, Anti - Locking System L FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Bumper, HD Rear Step FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Cigarette Lighter or Auxiliary Power Source FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD r Cruise Control/Tilt Steering Wheel L FCY /STD FCY /STD L FCY /STD Dome Light FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Door Trim Panels FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Floor Covering, Vinyl FCY /STD FCY /STD r FCY /STD Fuel Capacity 26 Gallon 26 Gallon 26 Gallon Gauges In Lieu of Warning Lights (FCY) Speedometer, Tachometer, FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Fuel, Oil Pressure, Coolant temp, Amp Glass, Tinted All Around FCY /STD FCY /STD L FCY /STD Headliner, Non Metallic FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Keys, Four (4) Set of Exterior Keyed Door Locks, Driver & Front DLR DLR DLR Passenger Doors, or Remote Keyless Entry w/ 2 Fobs Mirrors, Manufacturer's Standard Exterior Mirrors, L & R L FCY /STD a FCY /STD FCY /STD Power Group (Windows, Door Locks, Mirrors) FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Radio, AM /FM (Factory Installed) FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD r Rear Axle Ratio 3 73 3 73 L 3 73 Seating, Head Restraint Type, Vinyl or Cloth Front Bench Folding FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Spare Tire Carrier, Jack, Lug Wrench Full size conventional spare r FCY /STD FCY /STD r FCY /STD Steering, Power FCY /STD FCY /STD L FCY /STD Tires, Steel Belted Radial, On -Off Road or All Terrain Tread, FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Matching Full Size Spare Tire and Wheel Transmission, Automatic P265/70R17 P265/70R17 P265/701117 r Wipers, Intermittent FCY /STD FCY /STD FCY /STD Standard Specifications Chrysler /Dodge Ram 1500 2WD Page 1 of 2 CHRYSLER/DODGE RAM 1500 2WD STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED) Factory Warranty 3 Yr /36,000 3 Yr /36,000 3 Yr /36,000 5 Yr /100,000 5 Yr /100,000 L 5 Yr /100,000 Equipment above, if any, that will not be OEM factory Extra Keys Extra Keys Extra Keys installed Ground Clearance 7 6" 7 6" 7 6" r Tire chain compatible as equipped above r Yes /Chains Yes /Chains Yes /Chains Mercury Content, If Any, In Vehicle L None None L None Vehicle Emission Level Certification (CA) 50 State (NAS) 50 State (NAS) 50 State (NAS) EPA Estimated MPG as equipped above City 17 Hwy 25 City 17 Hwy 25 City 17 Hwy 25 NHTSA Crash Test Ratings (1 to 5 stars) Frontal 4 Frontal 4 Frontal 4 Passenger 4 Passenger 4 Passenger 4 Side /Front 5 Side /Front 5 Side /Front 5 Side /Rear 5 Side /Rear 5 Side /Rear 5 Rollover 4 Rollover 4 Rollover 4 Days to Deliver after receipt of order 90 to 120 90 to 120 90 to 120 r r Starting Date of Model Year Production In Production In Production In Production Standard Specifications Chrysler /Dodge Ram 1500 2WD Page 2 of 2 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ■■ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa■ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaraaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaa SUBJECT 2014 KPS Rates & Study Session Date February 12, 2014 Underwriting Criteria COUNCIL MEETING Date February 19, 2014 Department Legal /HR Division Presenter Charlotte Belmore Phone 473 -5926 SUMMARY Approval of the KPS 2014 Rates and Underwriting Criteria and authorization of formal execution of the 2014 contracts between the City and KPS Health Plans for employee group health insurance coverage by the Mayor The new rates, which were negotiated on our behalf by our benefits consultants, reflect a 8 9% rate increase above the 2013 levels ATTACHMENTS KPS 2014 Premium Rates & Underwriting Criteria for KPS Plan A, KPS Plan B and KPS Retiree Plan FISCAL IMPACTS This increase was accounted for in the 2014 adopted budget, therefore, no amendment is needed STUDY SESSION AGENDA © No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY ACTION © Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to approve the 2014 KPS Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria between the City and KPS, and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the coverage contracts with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented COUNCIL ACTION ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 11/02/12 `` KPS Health Plans Business Address Mailing Address 400 Warren Avenue P O Box 34803 Bremerton, WA 98337 Seattle, WA 98124 -1803 CITY OF BREMERTON — PLAN A COVERAGE CONTRACT Group Number 1000780 Effective Date January 1, 2014 Contract Renewal Month January Open Enrollment Period December This Coverage Contract includes the following Attachment A Benefits Booklet Attachment B Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria KPS Health Plans (KPS) is a licensed health care services contractor (HCSC) in Washington State In its capacity as an HCSC, KPS agrees to underwrite and provide the benefits and services described in any Benefits Booklet that may be listed above (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Attachment A "), as applicable to the eligible Employees and their Eligible Dependents of the above -named Group, provided the Group, its eligible Employees, and their Eligible Dependents meet and comply with the provisions of this Coverage Contract ( "Contract') C14BREMA TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS 1 CONTRACT EXAMINATION PERIOD 3 EFFECTIVE DATE, DURATION, AND RENEWAL 3 PREMIUM PAYMENT PROVISIONS 3 Payment Due Date /Grace Period 3 Premium Rate Adjustments 3 Premiums Paid by Subscribers /Dependents 4 Premium Refunds 4 ELIGIBILITY AND ENROLLMENT 4 Group Eligibility 4 Subscriber /Dependent Eligibility Requirements 4 Eligibility of Newborn and Adopted Children 4 Court- ordered Coverage for Eligible Dependent Children 5 Enrollment Reporting Requirements 5 Enrollment Timeframes 5 When Coverage Begins 5 Coverage Waiting Periods 6 TERMINATION OF COVERAGE 6 Continuity of Coverage 6 Termination or Rescission of Contract 6 Termination or Rescission of Enrollee Coverage 7 COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act -1985) 8 Fraudulent Information 8 Re- Enrollment/Reinstatement 8 SUBSCRIBER/DEPENDENT LIABILITY AND RIGHTS 8 Subscriber /Dependent Liability 8 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 9 Applicable Law 9 Assignment of Benefits 9 Binding Agreement 9 Confidentiality 9 Contract Modifications 9 Coverage Limits 9 Entire Agreement 9 Equity of Application 10 Force Majeure 10 Group Cooperation 10 Headings 10 Notices 10 Severabdity 10 Third Party Beneficiaries 11 Waiver of Breach 11 COVERAGE CONTRACT DEFINITIONS Capitalized words found in the text of this Contract are defined below or may be found in Attachment A Child or Children (i) Natural children, adopted children, stepchildren or other legally designated ward under the Limiting Age who is a dependent of the Subscriber or the Subscriber's Spouse (u) Children under the Limiting Age who are legally entitled to receive medical coverage as a result of a court order binding either the Subscriber or the Subscriber's Spouse, regardless of whether or not the Subscriber or Subscriber's Spouse has legal custody of the chtid(ren) (iii) Children who have reached the Limiting Age, or are older than the Limiting Age, are incapable of self - sustaining employment due to developmental disability or physical handicap, and are dependent upon the Subscriber or the Subscriber's Spouse for total or partial support and maintenance (see the Continued Eligibility for Disabled Dependent Children section of Attachment A) Contract this document and any other attachments, exhibits, Riders, or Endorsements listed on the title page or otherwise described herein, and any subsequent amendments or modifications to the Contract or its attachments, exhibits, Riders, or Endorsements Contract Renewal Month the calendar month specified on the title page of this Contract during which the Group may renew its coverage each year Covered Benefits and Services those Medically Necessary benefits and services described in Attachment A that an Enrollee is entitled to receive Eligible Dependent the legal Spouse and /or Children of a LEOFF I or LEOFF II law enforcement officer Employee (a) LEOFF I employees who are full -time law enforcement officers or firefighters hired prior to October 1, 1977, and who are members of the LEOFF system as defined in Sections (3) and (4), CH 131, Law of 1972, 1 st Ex Session, or (b) LEOFF II employees who are full -time law enforcement officers or firefighters hired on or after October 1, 1977, and who are not members of the LEOFF system as defined in Sections (3) and (4), CH 131, Law of 1972, 1 st Ex Session Endorsement an amendment to the conditions of coverage or the benefits provided by this Group Plan Enrollee a person enrolled in this Group Plan Group the employer entity, association, or other group that has entered into this Contract with KPS Group Master Application the application form completed by the Group and submitted to KPS prior to securing coverage under this Group Plan Group Plan the Premium rates and benefits chosen by the Group as listed in Attachment A, any Riders and Endorsements, Attachment B — Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria, plus other attachments that state the terms and conditions for eligibility and administration of Covered Benefits and Services Limiting Age the age at which Children may no longer be covered under this Group Plan as an Eligible Dependent of the Subscriber The Limiting Age is specified in the Benefits Summary section of Attachment A Medical Director the licensed physician acting as chief medical advisor for KPS Open Enrollment Period the 31 -day period or some other period agreed to by both KPS and the Group, beginning one (1) month prior to the Group's Renewal Month or at some other mutually agreeable time but at least annually During the Open Enrollment Period, Subscribers may add or delete Eligible Dependents, and all eligible Employees and their Eligible Dependents have the opportunity to select from alternative health plans offered by the Group Coverage will be effective as of the renewal date Page 1 COVERAGE CONTRACT Participating Facility an accredited facility, which has contracted with KPS, either directly or indirectly, to provide health care services to Enrollees Participating Facilities have agreed to accept the KPS allowance for Covered Benefits and Services as payment in full, except for Deductible, Copayment, and Coinsurance amounts, which are the responsibility of the Enrollee Participating Provider a Provider who has contracted with KPS, either directly or indirectly, to provide health care services to Enrollees Participating Providers have agreed to accept the KPS allowance for Covered Benefits and Services as payment in full, except for Deductible, Copayment, and Coinsurance amounts, which are the responsibility of the Enrollee Premium the periodic payment made by, or on behalf of, the Enrollee as consideration for this Group Plan and in accordance with the terms of this Contract Premium Due Date the scheduled, periodic dates by which Premium payments must be received by KPS as a condition for continued enrollment in this Group Plan This date is typically the first day of each month of coverage Provider a licensed or certified health care practitioner acting within the scope of his /her license or certificate Rider an additional benefit over and above those listed in the Benefits Summary section of Attachment A Rider documents are attached at the back of Attachment A and provide detailed benefit information Spouse (i) An individual who is living in a marital relationship with the Subscriber The marital relationship must be legally recognized by the state of Washington (n) An individual who is living with the Subscriber as a state registered domestic partner Subscriber an eligible employee who is enrolled in this Group Plan, or any other eligible person, who is the principal Enrollee in this Group Plan Page 2 COVERAGE CONTRACT CONTRACT EXAMINATION PERIOD If, after examination, the Group is not satisfied with this Contract for any reason, the Group may return the Contract to KPS within ten (10) days of the date it is received Upon receipt of the returned Contract, KPS will refund to the Group any pre -paid Premiums The Contract shall subsequently be deemed null and void EFFECTIVE DATE, DURATION, AND RENEWAL This Contract shall begin at 12 01 a m Pacific Time on the effective date (as indicated on the title page), and shall remain in effect until the Contract Renewal Month unless terminated according to the provisions set forth herein Thereafter, this Contract may be renewed automatically at 12 01 a m on the same date (month and day) in subsequent calendar years, unless otherwise terminated according to the provisions set forth herein PREMIUM PAYMENT PROVISIONS Payment Due Date /Grace Period The initial Premium payment is due and payable to KPS on or before the effective date of this Contract indicated on the title page Thereafter, Premium payments are due and payable on or before the first day of every month ( "Premium Due Date ") for which coverage is provided A roster of current enrollment and enrollment changes must accompany each Premium payment A ten (10) day grace period following the Premium Due Date is allowed, during which time this Contract shall not be terminated If payment is not received within the ten (10) day grace period, KPS may, at its sole discretion, elect to extend the grace period for up to 60 days from the Premium Due Date or terminate this Contract without notice to the Group If KPS elects to terminate this Contract due to non - payment of Premium, the effective date of termination will be retroactive to the last day of the month for which payment was received No further liability for claims will accrue to KPS Enrollees in this Group Plan shall not be entitled to benefits during any calendar month for which the Premium, on his /her behalf, was not received by KPS Premium payments, if applicable, must accompany all applications for coverage Premium Rate Adjustments The Premium rates applicable to this Group Plan are defined in Attachment B - Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria Rates are guaranteed until the Contract Renewal Month each calendar year Notwithstanding the foregoing, KPS reserves the right to revise the rates as follows ➢ As part of the annual Contract renewal process ➢ As a result of any state or federal law or regulation that imposes an additional tax, new tax, or other assessment on KPS revenue ➢ In the event there is a material change in the basis upon which KPS assumed risk under this Contract Such changes may include inaccurate information presented by the Group, changes in the benefits, or other Contract terms required by statute or regulation, underwriting guidelines, or fluctuations of ten percent (10 %) or more in the number of enrolled Subscribers and /or Eligible Dependents KPS will give the Group 60 days prior written notice of any change in Premium rates not associated with the annual Contract renewal process KPS will give the Group 30 days prior written notice of rate increases associated with the annual Contract renewal process Page 3 COVERAGE CONTRACT Premiums Paid by Subscribers /Dependents In certain instances, Subscribers and their enrolled Eligible Dependents may be required to self -pay their Premiums in order to continue coverage Those instances include ➢ Strikes, lockouts, and other labor disputes that cause a disruption in Employee benefits ➢ When the Subscriber and /or Eligible Dependent(s) elects to continue coverage under a COBRA provision or other coverage continuation provision available under this Group Plan The Group is required to collect self -paid Premiums for continuation coverage and forward payments to KPS on or before the Premium Due Date In the instance of strikes, lockouts, and labor disputes, the Enrollee may self -pay their Premium directly to the Group on or before the Premium Due Date Premium Refunds KPS will refund to the Group any Premium paid, in advance, for periods after the termination date of this Group Plan In the case of ineligible persons enrolled in this Group Plan, KPS will refund to the Group any Premium paid, during a period of ineligibility, that is in excess of claim payments made on behalf of the ineligible person(s), during the period of ineligibility This refund will not exceed an amount equal to three (3) months of Premium payments ELIGIBILITY AND ENROLLMENT Group Eligibility In order to be eligible to participate in this Group Plan, the Group must continuously meet all eligibility, participation, Group size, contribution, and other requirements specified in the Group Master Application form KPS reserves the right to audit the Group's employment, payroll, and eligibility records to ensure that the Group continues to meet its participation requirements and to ensure that eligible Employees and their Eligible Dependents are properly enrolled in this Group Plan Subscriber /Dependent Eligibility Requirements Active, full -time LEOFF I and LEOFF II Employees, as defined in the Definitions section are eligible to enroll in this Group Plan Eligible Dependents of an active, full -time LEOFF I or LEOFF II law enforcement officer, as defined in the Definitions section, are also eligible to enroll in this Group Plan The children of an Eligible Dependent, other than the Children of the Spouse, are not eligible to enroll in this Group Plan Subscribers and their Eligible Dependents who do not enroll when they are initially eligible must wait until the next Open Enrollment Period, except in certain circumstances (see the Enrollment Under Special Circumstances section of Attachment A) Eligibility of Newborn and Adopted Children Newborn, adopted Children, and Children placed for adoption are initially eligible for coverage as follows ➢ Natural newborn Children are eligible as of the date of birth and are covered automatically for a period of three (3) weeks In order for coverage to continue after the initial three (3) week period, the Children must qualify as an Eligible Dependent If additional Premium is required, the application and Premium for the Children must be received by KPS within 60 days of birth Page 4 COVERAGE CONTRACT ➢ Adopted Children and Children placed for adoption are eligible (i) on the date of their adoption, (u) on the date the Subscriber or Spouse assumes legal obligation for total or partial support in anticipation of adoption, or (iii) on the date the Subscriber or Spouse acquires partial or complete legal custody If additional Premium is required, the application and Premium for coverage must be received by KPS within 60 days of the date of placement for adoption NOTE When additional Premium is not required, we encourage enrollment as soon as possible to prevent delays in claims processing Court- ordered Coverage for Eligible Dependent Children In the case of court- ordered coverage dependent Children become initially eligible on the date the Subscriber or Spouse receives the order to provide medical coverage for the Child, even if neither the Subscriber nor the Spouse is the custodial parent KPS requests that an application for coverage be submitted within 31 days of the date of the court order Coverage will become effective on the first day of the month, following the effective date of the court order Enrollment Reporting Requirements The Group will verify enrollment of all Employees and their dependents eligible for enrollment under this Contract and ensure that appropriate documentation is submitted to KPS for approval Enrollment Timeframes Current LEOFF I and LEOFF II Employees, including Eligible Dependents of active, full -time LEOFF I and LEOFF II law enforcement officers, are initially eligible to apply for coverage beginning on the effective date of this Group Plan Application for coverage must be received by KPS within 31 days of initial eligibility New LEOFF II Employees, including Eligible Dependents of active, full -time LEOFF I and LEOFF II law enforcement officers, may initially apply for coverage on the first day of the first full month following their first day of employment Application for coverage must be received by KPS within 31 days of initial eligibility Those Employees who do not enroll immediately following their probationary period(s) must wait until the next Open Enrollment Period A new Spouse and the Spouse's Children may initially apply for coverage as of the date of marriage Application for coverage must be received by KPS within 31 days of initial eligibility When Coverage Begins Coverage for new Enrollees begins on their date of initial eligibility provided they enrolled in this Group Plan within the specified time limits (see Enrollment Timeframes) and any applicable Premium amounts have been paid If the Employee enrolls during an Open Enrollment Period, coverage will begin on the first of the month, following the Open Enrollment Period Newborn Children who meet eligibility requirements are covered automatically for a period of three (3) weeks from the date of birth, provided either the female Subscriber, or male Subscriber's Spouse, is eligible for maternity coverage under this Group Plan at the time of the Child's birth If additional Premium is required, coverage will not extend beyond the three- (3) week period unless the Child is enrolled within 60 days of the date of birth Any applicable Premium amount must accompany the enrollment application If additional Premium is required, coverage for adopted Children is retroactive to the date the Children were adopted, legally placed for adoption, or when the Subscriber or Subscriber's Spouse assumes legal obligation for total or partial support of the Children in anticipation of adoption, provided that the application and applicable Premium for the Children are received by KPS within 60 days from the date of adoption, placement for adoption, or assumption of financial responsibility NOTE When additional Premium is not required, we encourage enrollment as soon as possible to prevent delays in claims processing Page 5 COVERAGE CONTRACT Coverage Waiting Periods (This section does not apply to LEOFF I Employees) Transplant Procedures KPS provides coverage for transplant procedures only after you have been continuously enrolled under this Group Plan for six (6) months This transplant waiting period applies to the transplant procedure, as well as any pre- and post - transplant care directly related to a transplant you receive while covered under this Group Plan Creditable Coverage If you were required to complete an employer imposed probationary period, the waiting periods begin on the first day of your probationary period The transplant procedures waiting period may be reduced by the number of months of Creditable Coverage you have accrued under other health care programs prior to your enrollment in this Group Plan Creditable Coverage means periods of other health coverage an Enrollee may use to reduce transplant procedures waiting period These include • Group health coverage • Part A or Part B of Medicare • Medicaid • Military health coverage • Indian Health Service or tribal coverage • State High Risk Pool • Federal or Public Health Plans • Peace Corps Plan • State Children's Health Insurance Program • Other health insurance coverage The Enrollee will receive credit for prior Creditable Coverage if it was continuous and terminated not more than three (3) months immediately preceding enrollment in this Group Plan Health coverage will be considered continuous if there was not more than a three (3) month break between any Creditable Coverage No credit will be given if there was more than a three (3) month break between any coverage between the Enrollee's prior plan and their effective date of enrollment in this Group Plan Any Employer imposed probationary period will not be considered a break in coverage or creditable coverage To request a credit to the transplant procedures waiting period, the Enrollee must submit a Certificate of Creditable Coverage from the prior health plan carrier with his /her enrollment application In lieu of a Certificate of Creditable Coverage, the Enrollee must provide all of the following information ➢ The name of the prior health plan carrier ➢ The dates of coverage under the prior plan ➢ Proof of coverage under the prior plan that documents the coverage penod(s) TERMINATION OF COVERAGE Continuity of Coverage Continuity of coverage under this Contract is guaranteed to all Enrollees provided the Group continues to meet eligibility requirements and continues to pay applicable Premium payments on a timely basis Termination or Rescission of Contract This Contract may be terminated as of the date on which any of the following occurs ➢ The Group fads to make full Premium payments ➢ The Group violates, or refuses to comply with, the terms and conditions of this Contract ➢ The Group violates, or refuses to comply with, any published KPS policies and procedures that have been approved by the Insurance Commissioner Page 6 COVERAGE CONTRACT ➢ There is a change to, or implementation of, federal or state law that prohibits the continued offering of this Group Plan ➢ KPS replaces this Group Plan In this case, the replacement plan will (i) include the services covered under the replaced Group Plan, (u) be offered to the Group's eligible Employees and their Eligible Dependents, and (iii) not significantly limit access to the kind of services covered under the replaced Group Plan In addition, the Group may terminate this Contract, at any time, by providing thirty (30) days written notice to KPS KPS may rescind or terminate this Contract upon thirty (30) days written notice in the event that intentional misrepresentation of material fact or fraud was used in order to obtain Group coverage In no event will coverage be terminated or rescinded solely on the basis of an Enrollee's physical or mental condition provided they meet all other eligibility requirements set forth by the Group The Group may appeal a termination or rescission decision through the KPS appeals process Either party may terminate this agreement in the event of intentional misrepresentation, fraud, or omission of information by the other party in performance of its responsibilities under this agreement If this Contract is terminated coverage for all Enrollees will end automatically on the effective date of termination, or on the last day of the last month for which the Group paid the Premium, whichever occurs first KPS will refund to the Group any Premium paid for periods after the termination date In the case of termination or non - renewal of this Contract, KPS shall be responsible for providing the effective date of termination of coverage to all affected Subscribers and their Eligible Dependents Termination or Rescission of Enrollee Coverage Coverage for an individual Enrollee under this Contract will end as of the date on which any one of the following events occurs ➢ Non - payment of any Premium amount, when Premium payment is the responsibility of the Enrollee ➢ The Enrollee loses eligibility for coverage under this Contract ➢ The Enrollee refuses to comply with the terms and conditions of this Group Plan as described in Attachment A ➢ The Enrollee obtains coverage through intentional misrepresentation of material fact or fraud ➢ The Enrollee voluntarily disenrolls from this Group Plan ➢ There is a change in either state or federal laws that no longer permit KPS from offering this Group Plan ➢ This Contract is terminated Additionally, Eligible Dependent coverage ends if ➢ The Subscriber is no longer employed or no longer meets eligibility requirements ➢ The Subscriber dies ➢ The Children reach the Limiting Age Coverage ends on the last day of the month in which the Enrollee was eligible for coverage, provided all applicable Premium amounts have been paid In the case of non - payment of Premium, coverage ends on the last day of the month for which KPS received a Premium payment KPS will be entitled to recover claims payments for services received by the Enrollee after the termination date, unless there was prior authorization for those services Upon termination of coverage either KPS or the Group shall issue a Certificate of Creditable Coverage certifying the period(s) during which the Enrollee was enrolled in this Group Plan An Enrollee who loses coverage under this Group Plan may be eligible to continue coverage or enroll in a KPS Conversion Plan (see the Continuation of Coverage section of Attachment A) A Subscriber who voluntarily disenrolls from this Group Plan will not be eligible to re- enroll in this Group Plan, until the next Open Enrollment Period See the Enrollment Under Special Circumstances section of Attachment A for exceptions to this policy Page 7 COVERAGE CONTRACT COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act -1985) If an Enrollee loses eligibility for coverage under this Group Plan, they may be eligible to continue their coverage for a period of time specified by federal law and regulations then in effect This continuation of coverage is referred to as COBRA and applies generally to groups of 20 or more employees KPS offers coverage only when ➢ Groups are required by law to provide COBRA coverage for their employees, and ➢ KPS is notified of a beneficiary's election of COBRA coverage within 31 days of that election being made Continuation of coverage under COBRA is not automatic Enrollees must apply for continuation of their Group coverage within 60 days of the date they receive a COBRA election notice from the Group KPS offers COBRA coverage to Groups only as required by law The Group Plan Administrator is required to notify KPS of an Enrollee's election of COBRA continuation coverage within 31 days of that election Failure on the Enrollee's part to make a timely election, or failure on the part of the Group Plan Administrator to provide KPS with timely notification of the election, will be interpreted by KPS as a waiver of the Enrollee's right to continue coverage under this provision Failure by the Group Plan Administrator to provide timely notification to KPS may not, in all cases, eliminate the Group's obligation to provide continuation coverage It will, however, eliminate any obligation on the part of KPS to provide the Enrollee with COBRA continuation coverage under this Group Plan Fraudulent Information In the event it is discovered that the Group has provided false or misleading information in connection with the provisions of this Contract for the purpose of defrauding KPS, KPS reserves the right to terminate or rescind coverage and shall inform the appropriate state and regulatory authorities, including, but not limited to, the Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner (OIC) for a determination of the Group's liability Re- Enrollment/Reinstatement If this Contract has been terminated by KPS due to non - payment of Premium, the Group automatically forfeits all rights to guaranteed renewal of coverage afforded under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 Any decision to reinstate or re- enroll the Group is at the sole discretion of KPS SUBSCRIBER/DEPENDENT LIABILITY AND RIGHTS Subscriber /Dependent Liability Subscribers and their Eligible Dependents who are enrolled in this Group Plan are liable for the following costs ➢ Deductible (defined in Attachment A) ➢ Copayments (defined in Attachment A) ➢ Charges for non - Covered Benefits and Services ➢ Coinsurance, up to the Coinsurance Maximum limit (defined in Attachment A) ➢ Charges incurred after a benefit maximum for a specific service or supply has been exhausted ➢ Charges in excess of the amount allowed by KPS for Non - Participating Providers If KPS fails to reimburse a Participating Provider for the cost of Medically Necessary Covered Benefits and Services provided in accordance with the terms of this Contract, neither the Enrollee nor the Group shall be required to compensate the Participating Provider for such services beyond the limit of Deductibles, Copayments, or Coinsurance amounts specified in Attachment A What happens if a Provider no longer participates with KPS? If a Participating Provider chooses to terminate their agreement with KPS, we will notify the affected Enrollees of the termination The notification will allow Enrollees at least 60 days to either (i) complete their Page 8 COVERAGE CONTRACT course of treatment, or (u) appropriately transfer their care to another Participating Provider After the 60 days, services received from a Provider who has terminated their agreement with KPS will be covered at the Non - Participating Provider benefit level GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Applicable Law This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the state of Washington and is entered into in Bremerton Washington Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Contract shall be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction in Kitsap County, Washington or the U S District for the Western District of Washington Assignment of Benefits The benefits of this Contract shall accrue to Subscribers and their enrolled Eligible Dependents This Contract, payments, or Covered Benefits and Services are not assignable to a third party KPS reserves the right to make benefit payments to the Subscriber, their Provider(s), or jointly, as KPS deems necessary and appropriate, subject to federal and /or state laws Binding Agreement This Contract is binding on KPS and the Group, as well as their respective executors, administrators, successors, and /or assigns By election of coverage or payment of applicable Premiums, or if the Group's Subscribers or their enrolled Eligible Dependents seek the services provided under this Contract, all of the terms, covenants, and conditions contained herein shall become binding on the Group and its Subscribers and any enrolled Eligible Dependents, notwithstanding the failure of the Group to sign this Contract This Contract shall not bind KPS until (i) a person authorized by KPS signs it, and (u) a signed copy is delivered to the Group Confidentiality The underwriting and financial terms of this Contract are confidential and shall not be disclosed except as is necessary for the performance of this Contract or as required by law Contract Modifications Except as set forth under the Premium Rate Adjustments section, KPS reserves the right to modify the provisions of this Contract, or the services described in Attachment A, upon 30 -days written notice to the Group The Group may elect to reject such modifications by providing KPS with 15 -days written notice However, rejection of a modification will result in the termination of this Contract as of the last day of the month for which Premium payment has been received Lack of notification of rejection by the Group shall be interpreted as acceptance of the modification, and this Contract will be renewed as modified No modification of the terms of this Contract shall be binding upon KPS unless endorsed, in writing, and signed by an authorized officer of KPS Such endorsement shall be deemed a part of this Contract, effective as of the effective date of the endorsement Any amendment or Contract modification required by law or regulation shall become effective as of the effective date required by such law or regulation Coverage Limits The Covered Benefits and Services offered under this Contract are subject to the coverage limits and maximums set forth in Attachment A Entire Agreement This Contract, together with Attachment A, any Riders and /or Endorsements attached hereto, and Attac B — Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria, constitutes the entire agreement This Page 9 COVERAGE CONTRACT Contract supersedes all previous communications, representations, or agreements, whether verbal or written, between KPS and the Group Equity of Application This Contract is intended to apply equally to all Enrollees Force Majeure In the event KPS is unable to perform its obligations hereunder by reason of fire, casualty, lockout, strike, labor condition, riot, war, act of God, or by ordinance, law, order, or decree by any legal authority, the Contract may, at the option of KPS, be suspended During any period of suspension, KPS shall not be required to perform any service hereunder, nor shall KPS be liable for any damages arising from any event that precipitated the suspension If this Contract is suspended pursuant to this provision, any obligation by the Group and /or an Enrollee to make Premium payments also shall be suspended for the same period of time Group Cooperation The Group agrees to cooperate with KPS in the administration of this Contract by ➢ Advising Subscribers and their enrolled Eligible Dependents of policies and procedures applicable to this Group Plan ➢ Providing Subscribers and their enrolled Eligible Dependents with Attachment A, ID cards, and any applicable notices or other information regarding this Group Plan ➢ Providing information about Enrollees that is relevant to the determination of eligibility, claim reimbursement, coordination of benefits, or other information required for the administration of this Contract ➢ Making appropriate payroll deductions, if applicable, to facilitate Premium payment Headings The headings of sections and paragraphs in this Contract are for convenience and reference purposes only and do not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of any provision of this Contract Notices Any notice that may affect the provisions of this Contract shall be deemed delivered to the Group when deposited in the United States mad, with prepaid postage, addressed to the Group at the most recent address listed for the Group Any notice that may affect the provisions of this Contract shall be deemed delivered to KPS when deposited in the United States mad, with prepaid postage, addressed to KPS Health Plans P O Box 34803 Seattle, WA 98124 -1803 Any requirement of KPS to provide notice to Enrollees shall be fulfilled when the Group has received such notice It is the responsibility of the Group to disseminate notices to Enrollees within 31 days of receipt Severability If a court of competent jurisdiction deems any term, provision, Endorsement, or condition of this Contract invalid or unenforceable, the same shall be deemed severable from this Contract The remaining provisions of this Contract shall remain in full force and shall in no way be affected or invalidated as a result of such decision Page 10 COVERAGE CONTRACT Third Party Beneficiaries There are no third party beneficiaries to this Contract Waiver of Breach Waiver of a breach of any provision of this Contract shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach of the same or different provision The following topics are described in detail in Attachment A Please refer to the Table of Contents in Attachment A to locate each section ELIGIBILITY AND ENROLLMENT ➢ Continuation of Inpatient Coverage ➢ Continued Eligibility for Disabled Dependent Children BENEFITS SUMMARY CONTINUATION OF COVERAGE Coverage During a Labor Dispute Continuation of Group Coverage Conversion Coverage COORDINATION OF BENEFITS (COB) KPS'S RIGHT OF REIMBURSEMENT AND SUBROGATION COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS PROCESS ENROLLEES RIGHTS ➢ KPS Privacy Policy ➢ Statement of ERISA Rights Page 11 KPS Health Plans Business Address Mailing Address 400 Warren Avenue P O Box 34803 Bremerton, WA 98337 Seattle, WA 98124 -1803 CITY OF BREMERTON — PLAN A COVERAGE CONTRACT Group Number 1000780 Effective Date January 1, 2014 Contract Renewal Month January Open Enrollment Period December This Coverage Contract includes the following Attachment A Benefits Booklet Attachment B Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria This Contract is entered into and delivered in the state of Washington and is governed by Washington State laws, except to the extent state laws are preempted by federal law Signature by an authorized Group representative or payment of the Premium shall constitute acceptance of the terms and conditions set forth herein FOR KIDS FOR GROUP W James Page Jr, President Signature Date Print Name Title Date KPS Health Plans Business Address Mailing Address 400 Warren Avenue P O Box 34803 Bremerton, WA 98337 Seattle, WA 98124 -1803 CITY OF BREMERTON — PLAN B COVERAGE CONTRACT Group Number 1000780 Effective Date January 1, 2014 Contract Renewal Month January Open Enrollment Period December This Coverage Contract includes the following Attachment A Benefits Booklet Attachment B Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria KPS Health Plans (KPS) is a licensed health care services contractor (HCSC) in Washington State In its capacity as an HCSC, KPS agrees to underwrite and provide the benefits and services described in Attachment A any Benefits Booklet that may be listed above (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Attachment A "), as applicable to the eligible Employees and their Eligible Dependents of the above -named Group, provided the Group, its eligible Employees, and their Eligible Dependents meet and comply with the provisions of this Coverage Contract ( "Contract") C14BREMB TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS 1 CONTRACT EXAMINATION PERIOD 3 EFFECTIVE DATE, DURATION, AND RENEWAL 3 PREMIUM PAYMENT PROVISIONS 3 Payment Due Date /Grace Period 3 Premium Rate Adjustments 3 Premiums Paid by Subscribers /Dependents 4 Premium Refunds 4 ELIGIBILITY AND ENROLLMENT 4 Group Eligibility 4 Subscriber /Dependent Eligibility Requirements 4 Eligibility of Newborn and Adopted Chdd(ren) 5 Court- ordered Coverage for Eligible Dependent Chdd(ren) 5 Enrollment Reporting Requirements 5 Enrollment Timeframes 5 When Coverage Begins 5 Coverage Waiting Periods 6 TERMINATION OF COVERAGE 7 Continuity of Coverage 7 Termination or Rescission of Contract 7 Termination or Rescission of Enrollee Coverage 7 COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act -1985) 8 Fraudulent Information 8 Re- Enrollment/Reinstatement 8 SUBSCRIBER/DEPENDENT LIABILITY AND RIGHTS 9 Subscriber /Dependent Liability 9 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 9 Applicable Law 9 Assignment of Benefits 9 Binding Agreement 9 Confidentiality 10 Contract Modifications 10 Coverage Limits 10 Entire Agreement 10 Equity of Application 10 Force Majeure 10 Group Cooperation 10 Headings 11 Notices 11 Severabdity 11 Third Party Beneficiaries 11 Waiver of Breach 11 COVERAGE CONTRACT DEFINITIONS Capitalized words found in the text of this Contract are defined below or may be found in Attachment A Child or Children (i) Natural children, adopted children, stepchildren, or other legally designated ward under the Limiting Age who is a dependent of the Subscriber or the Subscriber's Spouse (u) Children under the Limiting Age who are legally entitled to receive medical coverage as a result of a court order binding either the Subscriber or the Subscriber's Spouse, regardless of whether or not the Subscriber or Subscriber's Spouse has legal custody of the children (iii) Children who have reached the Limiting Ag, or are older than the Limiting Age, are incapable of self - sustaining employment due to developmental disability or physical handicap, and are dependent upon the Subscriber or the Subscriber's Spouse for total or partial support and maintenance (see the Continued Eligibility for Disabled Dependent Children section of Attachment A) Contract this document and any other attachments, exhibits, Riders, or Endorsements listed on the title page or otherwise described herein, and any subsequent amendments or modifications to this document, its attachments, exhibits, Riders or Endorsements Contract Renewal Month the calendar month specified on the title page of this Group Contract during which the Group may renew its coverage each year under this Group Plan Covered Benefits and Services those Medically Necessary benefits and services described in Attachment A that an Enrollee is entitled to receive Eligible Dependents the legal Spouse and /or Children of an Eligible Employee, or the legal Spouse and /or Children of an active, full -time LEOFF I or LEOFF II firefighter Employee an active, full -time Employee who is not a LEOFF I or LEOFF II Employee Endorsement an amendment to the conditions of coverage or the benefits provided by this Group Plan Enrollee a person enrolled in this Group Plan Group the employer entity, association, or other group that has entered into this Contract with KPS Group Master Application the form completed by the Group and submitted to KPS prior to securing coverage under this Group Plan Group Plan the Premium rates and benefits chosen by the Group as listed in Attachment A, any Riders and Endorsements, Attachment B — Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria, plus other attachments that state the terms and conditions for eligibility and administration of Covered Benefits and Services LEOFF I Employee an active, full -time law enforcement officer or firefighter hired prior to October 1, 1977, and who is a member of the LEOFF system as defined in Sections (3) and (4), CH 131, Law of 1972, 1 st Ex Session LEOFF II Employee an active, full -time law enforcement officer or firefighter hired on or after October 1, 1977, and who is not a member of the LEOFF system as defined in Sections (3) and (4), CH 131, Law of 1972, 1 Ex Session Limiting Age the age at which Children may no longer be covered under this Group Plan as an Eligible Dependent of the Subscriber The Limiting Age is specified in the Benefits Summary section of Attachment A Medical Director the licensed physician acting as chief medical advisor for KPS Open Enrollment Period the 31 -day period or some other period agreed to by both KPS and the Group, beginning one (1) month prior to the Group's Renewal Month or at some other mutually agreeable time but at least annually During the Open Enrollment Period, Subscribers may add or delete Eligible Dependents, and all eligible Employees and their Eligible Dependents have the opportunity to select from alternative health plans offered by the Group Coverage will be effective as of the renewal date Page 1 COVERAGE CONTRACT Participating Facility an accredited facility, which has contracted with KPS, either directly or indirectly, to provide health care services to Enrollees Participating Facilities have agreed to accept the KPS allowance for Covered Benefits and Services as payment in full, except for Deductible, Copayment, and Coinsurance amounts, which are the responsibility of the Enrollee Participating Provider a Provider who has contracted with KPS, either directly or indirectly, to provide health care services to Enrollees Participating Providers have agreed to accept the KPS allowance for Covered Benefits and Services as payment in full, except for Deductible, Copayment, and Coinsurance amounts, which are the responsibility of the Enrollee Premium the periodic payment made by, or on behalf of, the Enrollee as consideration for this Group Plan and in accordance with the terms of this Contract Premium Due Date the scheduled, periodic dates by which Premium payments must be received by KPS as a condition for continued enrollment in this Group Plan This date is the first day of each month of coverage Provider a licensed or certified health care practitioner acting within the scope of his /her license or certificate Rider an additional benefit over and above those listed in the Benefits Summary section of Attachment A Rider documents are attached at the back of Attachment A and provide detailed benefit information Spouse (i) An individual who is living in a marital relationship with the Subscriber The marital relationship must be legally recognized by the state of Washington (u) An individual who is living with the Subscriber as a state registered domestic partner Subscriber an eligible employee who is enrolled in this Group Plan, or any other eligible person, who is the principal Enrollee in this Group Plan Page 2 COVERAGE CONTRACT CONTRACT EXAMINATION PERIOD If, after examination, the Group is not satisfied with this Contract for any reason, the Group may return the Contract to KPS within ten (10) days of the date it is received Upon receipt of the returned Contract, KPS will refund to the Group any pre -paid Premiums The Contract shall subsequently be deemed null and void EFFECTIVE DATE, DURATION, AND RENEWAL This Contract shall begin at 12 01 a m Pacific Time on the Effective Date (as indicated on the title page), and shall remain in effect until the Contract Renewal Month unless terminated according to the provisions set forth herein Thereafter, this Contract may be renewed automatically at 12 01 a m on the same date (month and day) in subsequent Calendar Years, unless otherwise terminated according to the provisions set forth herein PREMIUM PAYMENT PROVISIONS Payment Due Date /Grace Period The initial Premium payment is due and payable to KPS on or before the effective date of this Contract indicated on the title page Thereafter, Premium payments are due and payable on or before the first day of every month ( "Premium Due Date ") for which coverage is provided A roster of current enrollment and enrollment changes must accompany each Premium payment A ten (10) day grace period following the Premium Due Date is allowed, during which time this Contract shall not be terminated If payment is not received within the ten (10) day grace period, KPS may, at its sole discretion, elect to extend the grace period for up to 60 days from the Premium Due Date or terminate this Contract without notice to the Group If KPS elects to terminate this Contract due to non- payment of Premium, the effective date of termination will be retroactive to the last day of the month for which payment was received No further liability for claims will accrue to KPS Enrollees in this Group Plan shall not be entitled to benefits during any calendar month for which the Premium, on his /her behalf, was not received by KPS Premium payments, if applicable, must accompany all applications for coverage Premium Rate Adjustments The Premium rates applicable to this Group Plan are defined in Attachment B - Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria Rates are guaranteed until the Contract Renewal Month each Calendar Year Notwithstanding the foregoing, KPS reserves the right to revise the rates as follows ➢ As part of the annual Contract renewal process ➢ As a result of any state or federal law or regulation that imposes an additional tax, new tax or other assessment on KPS revenue ➢ In the event there is a material change in the basis upon which KPS assumed risk under this Contract Such changes may include inaccurate information presented by the Group, changes in the benefits, or other Contract terms required by statute or regulation, underwriting guidelines, or fluctuations of ten percent (10 %) or more in the number of enrolled Subscribers and /or Eligible Dependents KPS will give the Group 60 days prior written notice of any change in Premium rates not associated with the annual Contract renewal process KPS will give the Group 30 days prior written notice of rate increases associated with the annual Contract renewal process Page 3 COVERAGE CONTRACT Premiums Paid by Subscribers /Dependents In certain instances, Subscribers and their enrolled Eligible Dependents may be required to self -pay their Premiums in order to continue coverage Those instances include ➢ Strikes, lockouts, and other labor disputes that cause a disruption in Employee benefits ➢ When the Subscriber and /or Eligible Dependent(s) elects to continue coverage under a COBRA provision or other coverage continuation provision available under this Group Plan The Group is required to collect self -paid Premiums for continuation coverage and forward payments to KPS on or before the Premium Due Date In the instance of strikes, lockouts, and labor disputes, the Enrollee may self -pay their Premium directly to the Group on or before the Premium Due Date Premium Refunds KPS will refund to the Group any Premium paid, in advance, for periods after the termination date of this Group Plan In the case of an ineligible person(s) enrolled in this Group Plan, KPS will refund to the Group any Premium paid, during a period of ineligibility, that is in excess of claim payments made on behalf of the ineligible person(s), during the period of ineligibility This refund will not exceed an amount equal to three (3) months of Premium payments ELIGIBILITY AND ENROLLMENT Group Eligibility In order to be eligible to participate in this Group Plan, the Group must continuously meet all eligibility, participation, Group size, contribution, and other requirements specified in the Group Master Application form KPS reserves the right to audit the Group's employment, payroll, and eligibility records to ensure that the Group continues to meet its participation requirements and to ensure that eligible Employees and their Eligible Dependents are properly enrolled in this Group Plan Subscriber /Dependent Eligibility Requirements Active, full -time Employees, as defined in the Definitions section and their Eligible Dependents, are eligible to enroll in this Group Plan Eligible Dependents of active, full -time LEOFF I or LEOFF II firefighters, as defined in the Definitions section, are also eligible to enroll in this Group Plan The Children of an Eligible Dependent, other than the Children of the Spouse, are not eligible to enroll in this Group Plan Subscribers and their Eligible Dependents who do not enroll when they are initially eligible must wait until the next Open Enrollment Period, except in certain circumstances (see the Enrollment Under Special Circumstances section of Attachment A) Page 4 COVERAGE CONTRACT Eligibility of Newborn and Adopted Children Newborn, adopted Children, and Children placed for adoption are initially eligible for coverage as follows ➢ Natural newborn Children are eligible as of the date of birth and is covered automatically for a period of three (3) weeks In order for coverage to continue after the initial three (3) week period, the Children must qualify as an Eligible Dependent If additional Premium is required, the application and Premium for the Children must be received by KPS within 60 days of birth ➢ Adopted Children and Children placed for adoption are eligible (i) on the date of their adoption, (n) on the date the Subscriber or Spouse assumes legal obligation for total or partial support in anticipation of adoption, or (iii) on the date the Subscriber or Spouse acquires partial or complete legal custody If additional Premium is required, the application and Premium for coverage must be received by KPS within 60 days of the date of placement for adoption NOTE When additional Premium is not required, we encourage enrollment as soon as possible to prevent delays in claims processing Court- ordered Coverage for Eligible Dependent Children In the case of court- ordered coverage dependent Children becomes initially eligible on the date the Subscriber or Spouse receives the order to provide medical coverage for the Children, even if neither the Subscriber nor the Spouse is the custodial parent KPS requests that an application for coverage be submitted within 31 days of the date of the court order Coverage will become effective on the first day of the month, following the effective date of the court order Enrollment Reporting Requirements The Group will verify enrollment of all Employees and their dependents eligible for enrollment under this Contract and ensure that appropriate documentation is submitted to KPS for approval Enrollment Timeframes Employees and their Eligible Dependents, including Eligible Dependents of active, full -time LEOFF I and LEOFF II firefighters, may initially apply for coverage in this Group Plan, beginning on the Group's effective date Application for coverage must be received by KPS within 31 days of initial eligibility New Employees and their Eligible Dependents, including Eligible Dependents of active, full -time LEOFF I and LEOFF II firefighters, may initially apply for coverage on the first day of the first full month, following their first day of employment Application for coverage must be received by KPS within 31 days of initial eligibility Those Employees who do not enroll immediately following their probationary period(s) must wait until the next Open Enrollment Period A new Spouse and the Spouse's Children may initially apply for coverage as of the date of marriage Application for coverage must be received by KPS within 31 days of initial eligibility When Coverage Begins Coverage for new Enrollees begins on their date of initial eligibility, provided they enrolled in this Group Plan within the specified time limits (see Enrollment Timeframes) and any applicable Premium amounts have been paid If the Employee enrolls during an Open Enrollment Period, coverage will begin on the first of the month following the Open Enrollment Period Newborn Children who meets eligibility requirements is covered automatically for a period of three (3) weeks from the date of birth, provided either the female Subscriber, or male Subscriber's Spouse, is eligible for maternity coverage under this Group Plan at the time of the Child's birth If additional Premium is required, coverage will not extend beyond the three- (3) week period unless the Child is enrolled within 60 days of the date of birth Any applicable Premium amount must accompany the enrollment application Page 5 COVERAGE CONTRACT If additional Premium is required, coverage for adopted Children is retroactive to the date the Children were adopted, legally placed for adoption, or when the Subscriber or Subscriber's Spouse assumes legal obligation for total or partial support of Children in anticipation of adoption, provided that the application and applicable Premium for the Children are received by KPS within 60 days from the date of adoption, placement for adoption, or assumption of financial responsibility NOTE When additional Premium is not required, we encourage enrollment as soon as possible to prevent delays in claims processing Coverage Waiting Periods Transplant Procedures KIPS provides coverage for transplant procedures only after you have been continuously enrolled under this Group Plan for six (6) months This transplant waiting period applies to the transplant procedure, as well as any pre- and post - transplant care directly related to a transplant you receive while covered under this Group Plan Creditable Coverage If you were required to complete an employer imposed probationary period, the waiting periods begin on the first day of your probationary period The transplant procedures waiting period may be reduced by the number of months of Creditable Coverage you have accrued under other health care programs prior to your enrollment in this Group Plan Creditable Coverage means periods of other health coverage an Enrollee may use to reduce transplant procedures waiting period These include ➢ Group health coverage ➢ Part A or Part B of Medicare ➢ Medicaid ➢ Military health coverage ➢ Indian Health Service or tribal coverage ➢ State High Risk Pool ➢ Federal or Public Health Plans ➢ Peace Corps Plan ➢ State Children's Insurance Program ➢ Other health insurance coverage The Enrollee will receive credit for prior Creditable Coverage if it was continuous and terminated not more than three (3) months immediately preceding their date of enrollment in this Group Plan Health coverage will be considered continuous if there was not more than a three (3) month break in Creditable Coverage No credit will be given if there was more than a three (3) month break in coverage between the Enrollee's prior plan and their effective date of enrollment in this Group Plan Any employer imposed probationary period will not be considered a break in coverage or Creditable Coverage To request a credit to the transplant procedures waiting period, the Enrollee must submit a Certificate of Creditable Coverage from the prior health plan carrier with his /her enrollment application In lieu of a Certificate of Creditable Coverage, the Enrollee must provide all of the following information ➢ The name of the prior health plan carrier ➢ The dates of coverage under the prior plan ➢ Proof of coverage under the prior plan that documents the coverage penod(s) Page 6 COVERAGE CONTRACT TERMINATION OF COVERAGE Continuity of Coverage Continuity of coverage under this Contract is guaranteed to all Enrollees provided the Group continues to meet eligibility requirements and continues to pay applicable Premium payments on a timely basis Termination or Rescission of Contract This Contract may be terminated as of the date on which any of the following occurs ➢ The Group fails to make full Premium payments ➢ The Group violates, or refuses to comply with, the terms and conditions of this Contract ➢ The Group violates, or refuses to comply with, any published KPS policies and procedures that have been approved by the Insurance Commissioner ➢ There is a change to, or implementation of, federal or state law that prohibits the continued offering of this Group Plan ➢ KPS replaces this Group Plan In this case, the replacement plan will (i) include the services covered under the replaced Group Plan, (ii) be offered to the Group's eligible Employees and their Eligible Dependents, and (iii) not significantly limit access to the kind of services covered under the replaced Group Plan In addition, the Group may terminate this Contract, at any time, by providing thirty (30) days written notice to KPS KPS may rescind or terminate this Contract upon thirty (30) days written notice in the event that intentional misrepresentation of material fact or fraud was used in order to obtain Group coverage In no event will coverage be terminated or rescinded solely on the basis of an Enrollee's physical or mental condition provided they meet all other eligibility requirements set forth by the Group The Group may appeal a termination or rescission decision through the KPS appeals process Either party may terminate this agreement in the event of intentional misrepresentation, fraud, or omission of information by the other party in performance of its responsibilities under this agreement If this Contract is terminated coverage for all Enrollees will end automatically on the effective date of termination, or on the last day of the last month for which the Group paid the Premium, whichever occurs first KPS will refund to the Group any Premium paid for periods after the termination date In the case of termination or non - renewal of this Contract, KPS shall be responsible for providing the effective date of termination of coverage to all affected Subscribers and their Eligible Dependents Termination or Rescission of Enrollee Coverage Coverage for an individual Enrollee under this Contract will end as of the date on which any one of the following events occurs ➢ Non - payment of any Premium amount, when Premium payment is the responsibility of the Enrollee ➢ The Enrollee loses eligibility for coverage under this Contract ➢ The Enrollee refuses to comply with the terms and conditions of this Group Plan as described in Attachment A ➢ The Enrollee obtains coverage through intentional misrepresentation of material fact or fraud ➢ The Enrollee voluntarily disenrolls from this Group Plan ➢ There is a change in either state or federal laws that no longer permit KPS from offering this Group Plan ➢ This Contract is terminated Additionally, Eligible Dependent coverage ends if ➢ The Subscriber is no longer employed or no longer meets eligibility requirements Page 7 COVERAGE CONTRACT ➢ The Subscriber dies ➢ The Children reach the Limiting Age Coverage ends on the last day of the month in which the Enrollee was eligible for coverage, provided all applicable Premium amounts have been paid In the case of non - payment of Premium, coverage ends on the last day of the month for which KPS received a Premium payment KPS will be entitled to recover claims payments for services received by the Enrollee after the termination date, unless there was prior authorization for those services Upon termination of coverage either KPS or the Group shall issue a Certificate of Creditable Coverage certifying the penod(s) during which the Enrollee was enrolled in this Group Plan An Enrollee who loses coverage under this Group Plan may be eligible to continue coverage or enroll in a KPS Conversion Plan (see the Continuation of Coverage section of Attachment A) A Subscriber who voluntarily disenrolls from this Group Plan will not be eligible to re- enroll in this Group Plan, until the next Open Enrollment Period See the Enrollment Under Special Circumstances section of Attachment A for exceptions to this policy COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act -1985) If an Enrollee loses eligibility for coverage under this Group Plan, they may be eligible to continue their coverage for a period of time specified by federal law and regulations then in effect This continuation of coverage is referred to as COBRA and applies generally to groups of 20 or more employees KPS offers coverage only when ➢ Groups are required by law to provide COBRA coverage for their employees, and ➢ KPS is notified of a beneficiary's election of COBRA coverage within 31 days of that election being made Continuation of coverage under COBRA is not automatic Enrollees must apply for continuation of their Group coverage within 60 days of the date they receive a COBRA election notice from the Group KPS offers COBRA coverage to Groups only as required by law The Group Plan Administrator is required to notify KPS of an Enrollee's election of COBRA continuation coverage within 31 days of that election Failure on the Enrollee's part to make a timely election, or failure on the part of the Group Plan Administrator to provide KPS with timely notification of the election, will be interpreted by KPS as a waiver of the Enrollee's right to continue coverage under this provision Failure by the Group Plan Administrator to provide timely notification to KPS may not, in all cases, eliminate the Group's obligation to provide continuation coverage It will, however, eliminate any obligation on the part of KPS to provide the Enrollee with COBRA continuation coverage under this Group Plan Fraudulent Information In the event it is discovered that the Group has provided false or misleading information in connection with the provisions of this Contract for the purpose of defrauding KPS, KPS reserves the right to terminate or rescind coverage and shall inform the appropriate state and regulatory authorities, including, but not limited to, the Washington State Office of the Insurance Commissioner (OIC) for a determination of the Group's liability Re- Enrollment/Reinstatement If this Contract has been terminated by KPS due to non - payment of Premium, the Group automatically forfeits all rights to guaranteed renewal of coverage afforded under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 Any decision to reinstate or re- enroll the Group is at the sole discretion of KPS Page 8 COVERAGE CONTRACT SUBSCRIBER/DEPENDENT LIABILITY AND RIGHTS Subscriber /Dependent Liability Subscribers and their Eligible Dependents who are enrolled in this Group Plan are liable for the following costs ➢ Deductible (defined in Attachment A) ➢ Copayments (defined in Attachment A) ➢ Charges for non - Covered Benefits and Services ➢ Coinsurance, up to the Coinsurance Maximum limit (defined in Attachment A) ➢ Charges incurred after a benefit maximum for a specific service or supply has been exhausted ➢ Charges in excess of the amount allowed by KPS for Non - Participating Providers If KPS fads to reimburse a Participating Provider for the cost of Medically Necessary Covered Benefits and Services provided in accordance with the terms of this Contract, neither the Enrollee nor the Group shall be required to compensate the Participating Provider for such services beyond the limit of Deductibles, Copayments, or Coinsurance amounts specified in Attachment A What happens if a Provider no longer participates with KPS? If a Participating Provider chooses to terminate their agreement with KPS, we will notify the affected Enrollees of the termination The notification will allow Enrollees at least 60 days to either (i) complete their course of treatment, or (u) appropriately transfer their care to another Participating Provider After the 60 days, services received from a Provider who has terminated their agreement with KPS will be covered at the Non - Participating Provider benefit level GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Applicable Law This Contract shall be governed by the laws of the state of Washington and is entered into in Bremerton Washington Any controversy or or claim arising out of or relating to this Contract shall be resolved in a court of competent jurisdiction in Kitsap County, Washington or the U S District for the Western District of Washington Assignment of Benefits The benefits of this Contract shall accrue to Subscribers and their enrolled Eligible Dependents This Contract, payments, or Covered Benefits and Services are not assignable to a third party KPS reserves the right to make benefit payments to the Subscriber, their Provider(s), or jointly, as KPS deems necessary and appropriate, subject to federal and /or state laws Binding Agreement This Contract is binding on KPS and the Group, as well as their respective executors, administrators, successors, and /or assigns By election of coverage or payment of applicable Premiums, or if the Group's Subscribers or their enrolled Eligible Dependents seek the services provided under this Contract, all of the terms, covenants, and conditions contained herein shall become binding on the Group and its Subscribers and any enrolled Eligible Dependents, notwithstanding the failure of the Group to sign this Contract This Contract shall not bind KPS until (i) a person authorized by KPS signs it, and (n) a signed copy is delivered to the Group Page 9 COVERAGE CONTRACT Confidentiality The underwriting and financial terms of this Contract are confidential and shall not be disclosed except as is necessary for the performance of this Contract or as required by law Contract Modifications Except as set forth under the Premium Rate Adjustments section, KPS reserves the right to modify the provisions of this Contract, or the services described in Attachment A, upon 30 -days written notice to the Group The Group may elect to reject such modifications by providing KPS with 15 -days written notice However, refection of a modification will result in the termination of this Contract as of the last day of the month for which Premium payment has been received Lack of notification of refection by the Group shall be interpreted as acceptance of the modification, and this Contract will be renewed as modified No modification of the terms of this Contract shall be binding upon KPS unless endorsed, in writing, and signed by an authorized officer of KPS Such endorsement shall be deemed a part of this Contract, effective as of the effective date of the endorsement Any amendment or Contract modification required by law or regulation shall become effective as of the effective date required by such law or regulation Coverage Limits The Covered Benefits and Services offered under this Contract are subject to the coverage limits and maximums set forth in Attachment A Entire Agreement This Contract, together with Attachment A, any Riders and /or Endorsements attached hereto, and Attachment B - Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria, constitutes the entire agreement This Contract supersedes all previous communications, representations, or agreements, whether verbal or written, between KPS and the Group Equity of Application This Contract is intended to apply equally to all Enrollees Force Majeure In the event KPS is unable to perform its obligations hereunder by reason of fire, casualty, lockout, strike, labor condition, riot, war, act of God, or by ordinance, law, order, or decree by any legal authority, the Contract may, at the option of KPS, be suspended During any period of suspension, KPS shall not be required to perform any service hereunder, nor shall KPS be liable for any damages arising from any event that precipitated the suspension If this Contract is suspended pursuant to this provision, any obligation by the Group and /or an Enrollee to make Premium payments also shall be suspended for the same period of time Group Cooperation The Group agrees to cooperate with KPS in the administration of this Contract by ➢ Advising Subscribers and their enrolled Eligible Dependents of policies and procedures applicable to this Group Plan ➢ Providing Subscribers and their enrolled Eligible Dependents with Attachment A, ID cards and any applicable notices or other information regarding this Group Plan ➢ Providing information about Enrollees that is relevant to the determination of eligibility, claim reimbursement, coordination of benefits, or other information required for the administration of this Contract ➢ Making appropriate payroll deductions, if applicable, to facilitate Premium payment Page 10 COVERAGE CONTRACT Headings The headings of sections and paragraphs in this Contract are for convenience and reference purposes only and do not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of any provision of this Contract Notices Any notice that may affect the provisions of this Contract shall be deemed delivered to the Group when deposited in the United States mad, with prepaid postage, addressed to the Group at the most recent address listed for the Group Any notice that may affect the provisions of this Contract shall be deemed delivered to KPS when deposited in the United States mad, with prepaid postage, addressed to KPS Health Plans P O Box 34803 Seattle, WA 98124 -1803 Any requirement of KPS to provide notice to Enrollees shall be fulfilled when the Group has received such notice It is the responsibility of the Group to disseminate notices to Enrollees within 31 days of receipt Severability If a court of competent jurisdiction deems any term, provision, Endorsement, or condition of this Contract invalid or unenforceable, the same shall be deemed severable from this Contract The remaining provisions of this Contract shall remain in full force and shall in no way be affected or invalidated as a result of such decision Third Party Beneficiaries There are no third party beneficiaries to this Contract Waiver of Breach Waiver of a breach of any provision of this Contract shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach of the same or different provision Page 11 COVERAGE CONTRACT The following topics are described in detail in Attachment A Please refer to the Table of Contents in Attachment A to locate each section ELIGIBILITY AND ENROLLMENT ➢ Continuation of Inpatient Coverage ➢ Continued Eligibility for Disabled Dependent Children BENEFITS SUMMARY CONTINUATION OF COVERAGE ➢ Coverage During a Labor Dispute ➢ Continuation of Group Coverage ➢ Conversion Coverage COORDINATION OF BENEFITS (COB) KPS'S RIGHT OF REIMBURSEMENT AND SUBROGATION COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS PROCESS ENROLLEE RIGHTS ➢ KPS Privacy Policy ➢ Statement of ERISA Rights Page 12 KPS Health Plans Business Address Mailing Address 400 Warren Avenue P O Box 34803 Bremerton, WA 98337 Seattle, WA 98124 -1803 CITY OF BREMERTON — PLAN B COVERAGE CONTRACT Group Number 1000780 Effective Date January 1, 2014 Contract Renewal Month January Open Enrollment Period December This Coverage Contract includes the following Attachment A Benefits Booklet Attachment B Premium Rates and Underwriting Criteria This Contract is entered into and delivered in the state of Washington and is governed by Washington State laws, except to the extent state laws are preempted by federal law Signature by an authorized Group representative or payment of the Premium shall constitute acceptance of the terms and conditions set forth herein FOR KPS FOR GROUP W James Page Jr, President Signature Date Print Name Title Date City of Bremerton January 1, 2014 Renewal Final Renewal PLAN A 2013 2014 Active LEOFF I Employees $98818 $1,07613 LEOFF II & non - LEOFF Employees $71754 $ 781 40 Spouse $79541 $ 86620 1 st Child $35921 $ 391 18 2nd Child+ $28912 $ 31485 LEOFF I Retirees (Under Age 65) Subscriber $2,58592 $2,81607 PLAN B Active LEOFF II & non - LEOFF Employees $62047 $ 67569 Spouse $69504 $ 75690 1 st Child $31620 $ 34434 2nd Child+ $24603 $ 26793 Renewal Adjustment - 8 90% u 1 From Roy Runyon Sent Wednesday, February 19, 2014 4 13 PM To Charlotte Belmore, Cathy Johnson Cc City Council, Roy Runyon Subject Agenda Item I KIPS rates Charlotte, Cathy, I have some questions related to KPS premium rates for 2014 1 How much more will this rate increase cost the City overall (all funds)? 2 What will the additional cost be to the General Fund? 3 Is this rate Increase included in the 2014 budget? Thanks, Roy 1 AGENDA BILL 6S CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT Professional Services Study Session Date February 12, 2014 Agreement with Parametrix for Design of the COUNCIL MEETING Date February 19, 2014 Marine Drive Low Impact Development (LID) Department Public Works and Utilities Stormwater Retrofit Presenter Chal Martin, Public Works Director Phone 473 -5758 SUMMARY The City of Bremerton accepted a no -match Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant from the Department of Ecology to fund the design of the Marine Drive Low Impact Development Stormwater Retrofit project The benefits of this project would be reduced runoff and improved stormwater quality entering Oyster Bay in addition to adding safe pedestrian routes with pervious sidewalks Parametrix has been selected as the engineering firm best qualified to design this project according to the requirements and schedule of the grant ATTACHMENTS Professional Services Agreement FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) The Stormwater Utility has received a $120,000 grant from the Department of Ecology for design of stormwater capital improvements This grant does not require a match STUDY SESSION AGENDA 0 No Presentation ❑ Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION N Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to approve the professional services agreement with Parametrix for design of the Marine Drive Low Impact Development Stormwater Retrofit in the amount not to exceed $120,000 and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented COUNCIL ACTION ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 01/25/13 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Engineering Design Services — Marine Drive Stormwater LID Retrofit Parametrix The City of Bremerton ( "City ") and Parametrix ( "Consultant "), referred to collectively as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services I. Scope: The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the Scope of Work, dated February, 2014, including any attachments thereto, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein The Scope of Work may be modified only pursuant to Section VII G of this Agreement If the Scope of Work provides for unspecified additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express written request of the City Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such services are performed II. Term: The City and the Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement The parties agree that the work described in Exhibit A is to be completed as provided for in the work schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B, provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays or extra work as provided for in Section IX A of this agreement III. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the City shall pay Consultant in an amount not to exceed $120,000 Consultant's charges and bills shall conform to the fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference The Consultant shall submit regular billing statements detailing work performed and amount charged on each task or portion thereof The descriptions shall conform to and fall within the categories set out in the Scope of Work and/or Fee Schedule Upon receipt of a conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to prioritize scoped work and accelerate and/or delay work tasks under the time frame set forth in Section II herein The Consultant's labor rates and billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibit C Consultant shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this Agreement Consultant shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in accordance with Exhibit C If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold payment until the statement is brought into compliance Such withholding does not relieve Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 1 of 13 IV. Relationship of Parties: Consultant represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its field of expertise Consultant and its personnel are independent Consultants and not employees of the City Consultant and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the City's employees and other Consultants None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub - Consultants of the Consultant Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub - Consultants during the performance of this Agreement The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent Consultants to perform the same or similar work As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management The City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of managerial control over Consultant or its personnel As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for payment of all taxes and licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement These taxes and fees include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State professional licensing, and City business licensing If any taxes or fees due the City have been declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges arising from the delinquency, from any payments due Consultant V. Indemnification: A Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with Consultant's performance of this Agreement, unless Consultant is conducting work pursuant to Subsection B below The City's review or acceptance of any of the work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification B Architects, Engineers and Any Other Professional Listed In and Performing Services Defined in RCW 42 24 115 Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that Consultant's services provided pursuant to this Agreement is subject to RCW 4 24 115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 2 of 13 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement VI. Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, sub - consultants or sub - Consultants Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing 1 Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage, and 2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage Coverage shall include but not be limited to blanket contractual, products /completed operations/broad form property damage, explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable, and employer's liability, and 3. Excess Liability insurance with limits not less than 1,000,000 limit per occurrence and aggregate 4. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence /claim Any payment of deductible or self - insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant All required policies shall be provided on an "occurrence" basis except professional liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a "claims- made" basis The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of an endorsement that is acceptable to the City, which names the City as an additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies and endorsements The City further reserves the right to reject any unacceptable policies and/or endorsements The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability The Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and it shall be an affirmative obligation upon Consultant to advise the City's Risk Manager by fax at (360) 473- 5161, or by certified mail, return receipt requested to City of Bremerton, Attn Risk Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 3 of 13 Management, 345 6` Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 within two days of the cancellation, suspension or substantive change of any insurance policy set out herein, and failure to do so shall be construed to be a breach of this Agreement The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason, proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as evidence of coverage VII. General Conditions. A Reports and Information When requested by the City, Consultant shall furnish periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement The reports and documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested Consultant shall maintain accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to substantiate all billed amounts B Ownership and Use of Records and Documents Original documents, drawings, designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the property of the City All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like information relating to its own business If such information is publicly available or is already in Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored at Consultant's office in Bremerton, Washington Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such information in the City's offices Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the City upon its request, and at reasonable cost All documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software or other items prepared or furnished by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments of service with respect to the project and are the property of the City Any reuse by the City for other than the specific purpose intended will be at City's sole risk C Work Performed at Consultant's Risk Consultant shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub - consultants in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work D Place of Work The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this Agreement at its offices in Bremerton, Washington Meetings with the City staff as described in Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 4 of 13 Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at locations mutually agreed upon by the parties E Entire Agreement This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement F Severability Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect G Modification This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by both Parties H Written Notices All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1st class mail, or by personal service, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing City Address Consultant Address Public Works and Utilities Parametrix 100 Oyster Bay Avenue N 4660 Kitsap Way Suite A Bremerton, WA 98312 Bremerton, WA 98312 I Waiver Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that provision Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be deemed waiver of any other right or power J Non - Waiver of Breach The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect K Compliance with Laws Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement L Choice of Law and Venue This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Washington Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court M Attorneys' Fees In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney's fees N Assignment Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without the written consent of the City shall be void Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 5 of 13 VIII. Nondiscrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate in employment or services to the public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, disability, or sexual orientation except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification IX. Termination- This Agreement shall remain in force until completion and acceptance of the services, terminated by written instrument upon mutual consent, or by the City of Bremerton for convenience This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a Party if the other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party, and the non- performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within thirty (30) days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non - performing Party Any Notice by Consultant shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work current through the termination date If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement A Excusable Delays The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due to 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials, equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency, 2) any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay, and 3) causes not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in writing of the cause of the delay If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement, the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay B Rights _ Upon Termination In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final invoice submitted to the City After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant X. Suspension & Debarment For contracts involving Federal funding, Consultant hereby certifies, by signing this agreement, that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency Consultant shall provide immediate written notice to the City if at any time it learns that it is or has become ineligible for certification Should Consultant enter into a covered transaction with another firm, Consultant agrees by signing this agreement that it will verify that the firm with whom it intends to do business is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, excluded or disqualified Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 6 of 13 CITY OF BREMERTON CONSULTANT By By its its Date Date Approved as to form Attest Bremerton City Attorney City Clerk R \L.egal\ Legal \Contracts\FORMS\Professional Services Agreement Form (2012) doc Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 7 of 13 Exhibit A - SCOPE OF WORK PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Bremerton received funding from the Department of Ecology 2013 -2015 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant Program to design a stormwater low impact development (LID) project Project criteria and completion deadlines are specified by the grant The City's Project Manager for this will be the Stormwater Permit Coordinator under the direction of the Water Resources Manager The Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit will treat and control runoff from approximately 1 2 miles of urban roadway surface and more than 800,000 ft of impervious surface using LID and nutrient - specific filtration The existing system collects runoff from the southern portion of Marine Drive, a portion of Rocky Point Road and Kitsap Way, as well as runoff from surrounding light commercial, residential and school impervious surfaces Water quality concerns are pollutants from vehicles, yards, and landscapes that contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, fertilizers, pesticides, and fecal coliform bacteria This project will help meet the Sinclair and Dyes Inlet fecal Coliform TMDL by improving water quality in Oyster Bay and will be a part of an effort to reopen currently closed commercial shellfish harvesting in the area Underground infiltration, filtration, bio- swales, and pervious concrete sidewalks will reduce water quantity and improve water quality at the stormwater outfall Water quality will be improved by integrating nutrient - specific filters into this system prior to the outfall Pervious concrete sidewalks will be installed to increase the infiltration while also providing safe areas for the local elementary school and residents in this high pedestrian use area The design will incorporate filtration systems, pervious concrete sidewalks, and underground infiltration /detention pipe The system will be designed to control, filter, and manage flow to the extent possible for the soil conditions PROJECT GOALS • Improve water quality • Reduce the quantity of runoff into Oyster Bay • Develop a cost - effective design to use in retrofitting other City storm sewer systems • Less expensive maintenance • Effectively treat stormwater runoff • Reduce water quantity by infiltrating stormwater back into the ground • Improve the area by adding pervious sidewalks and safe pedestrian routes SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Project design will reference 2013 -2015 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant Agreement No G1400319, Department of Ecology (DOE) Grant Program Guidelines August 2013 (Publication no 13 -10 -032), and the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (August 2012) B remerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 8 of 13 PROJECT TASKS TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS Parametrix Activities • Manage budget and schedule • Hold face to face meetings and progress calls with City Project Manager as needed and at key milestones • Prepare monthly progress reports and invoices City Responsibilities • Participate in progress calls and meetings • Payment of submitted invoices within 30 days Deliverables • Minutes from progress calls summarizing key action items • Monthly progress report and invoice Assumptions • Up to four face to face meetings will be held with City staff including design submittal review meetings and a presentation of the final design to Bremerton Public Works and Utilities Department staff • Project duration will be 10 months (February through November 2014) TASK 2 DESIGN Parametrix Activities • Submit data requests to City • Provide quality control reviews • Retain a geotechnical subconsultant to perform soil investigations and testing according to the 2012 Ecology Manual Geotechnical report will include recommendations for soil infiltration rates and retaining wall design • Design project components to include Infiltration trenches Bioswales Underground filtration basins using mixed media to treat identified contaminates of concern Retaining wall assessment and design Pervious sidewalk sections for project area Diversion weirs for existing manholes Sediment and trash filtration pre- treatment structures • Prepared plan sheets as listed in Exhibit C Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 9 of 13 City Activities • Furnish available data requests, drawings, records, etc in a timely manner • Provide timely review of deliverables • Provide a loaner copy of pertinent stormwater planning documents Deliverables • Submit 4 copies of the pre - design report (including 30% design plans and construction cost estimate) by March 31, 2014 • Submit 4 copies of the 90% design (plans, specifications, and estimate) by July 30, 2014 • Submit 4 copes of the final design (100% plans, specifications, and estimate) by October 31, 2014 The final design shall incorporate changes pursuant to comments received on the preliminary and 90% designs • Submit operations and maintenance manual for the filtration systems, sediment and trash removal system, bioswale, and pervious concrete sidewalks by October 31,2014 Assumptions • Notice to proceed will be received on February 21, 2014 • Geotechnical drilling can be accomplished within two weeks following notice to proceed • Feasibility of proposed design will be evaluated following geotechnical investigation and design may be adjusted with input from the City and Ecology prior to completion of 30% design • Pre - design will be completed using preliminary geotechnical recommendations • City review for each submittal will be completed within 2 weeks Ecology review for 30% and 90% submittals will be completed within 45 days • For each submittal, 4 hard copies will be submitted, plus electronic copes with reports in MS Word and PDF formats, with spreadsheets in Excel format Plans will be provided in half size (11 x17) hard copes TASK 3 BID PACKAGE Parametrix Activities • Prepare Bid Package plans, specifications, contract documents, and engineers estimate incorporating City review comments to the final design Deliverables • Submit 4 copies of the bid package by November 30, 2014 Assumptions • The City will provide the most current version of contract documents for use by Parametrix Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 10 of 13 • Four hard copies will be submitted, plus electronic copies with reports in MS Word and PDF formats, with spreadsheets in Excel format Plans will be provided in half size (11x17) and full size (22x34) hard copies TASK 4 MONITORING Parametrix Activities • Prepare Water Quality QAPP and perform stormwater sampling to determine water quality baseline for pollutants of concern and to determine suitable filtration media for filters • Prepare a technical memorandum describing the sampling results and recommendations for appropriate filter media Deliverables • Submit 4 copies of the QAPP by March 7, 2014 • Submit 4 copies of the sampling results technical memorandum by April 4, 2014 Assumptions • Notice to proceed will be received on February 21, 2014 • QAPP approval by Ecology will not be required • A total of two stormwater grab samples plus 1 duplicate (3 total) will be collected from the stormwater outfall at low tide Sampling dates will be coordinated with the City • All samples will be analyzed for diesel, motor oil, PAHs, priority pollutant metals, pesticides, herbicides, fecal coliforms, total dissolved solids, and total suspended solids • City review for the QAPP will be completed within 1 week • For each submittal, 4 hard copies will be submitted, plus electronic copies with reports in MS Word and PDF formats, with spreadsheets in Excel format TASK 5 SURVEY Parametrix Activities o Perform a topographical surrey of the two project areas sufficient for design and develop a base map of each area Deliverables • Final topographical base maps for use in design plans Assumptions • Survey of approximately 300 to 400 lineal of roadway in each project area will be performed, extending from approximately right of way line to right of way line Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 11 of 13 • Survey will include boundary lines, topography, break lines, surface features, and all utility locations including pipe inverts TASK 6 DIRECTED SERVICES Parametrix Activities • Perform additional services at the direction of the City Deliverables As directed by the City Assumptions • Work under this task will require prior written direction from the City TASK 7 SUBCONSULTANTS Parametrix Activities • Retain subconsultants to perform geotechnical studies, utility locates, and laboratory testing Deliverables • Submit geotechnical report by March 15, 2014 • Laboratory report for inclusion in sampling results technical memorandum Assumptions • Geotechnical investigation will include two soil borings to 30 feet each at each project location (4 borings total) If groundwater is encountered in the borings, one boring at each project location will be completed as a monitoring well for the purposes of groundwater level monitoring (maximum of two wells) • Up to two soil samples will be collected from each soil boring for testing for grain size analysis, cation exchange capacity, and organic content • The cost for the geotechnical studies included in Appendix C is an estimate and will be refined during design Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 12 of 13 Exhibit B SCHEDULE Notice to proceed February 21, 2014 30% Design March 31, 2014 90% Design ready for Ecology review July 30, 2014 Final Design October 31, 2014 Bid Package November 30, 2014 Bremerton/Parametrix Marine Drive LID Stormwater Retrofit Page 13 of 13 PARAMETRIX EXHIBIT C - BUDGET 2/5/2014 Project Marine Drive Stormwater LID Retrofit Client City of Bremerton PMX# BILLING STAFF Sr Erg Eng 111 CAD ShW Erg Struct CAD Survey Ctdef Survey PC WP Acct 233 1896 873 MULT D Dinkuhn D Zavack J Petersen J Mart A Valencia B Pusey J Kemrdtz L Stevens L Edwards V Sdeau TOTAL TOTAL PHASE TASK 325 Burdened Labor Rate $173 81 $10725 $10930 $18428 $13267 $15626 $11898 $8694 $9003 $96.88 HOURS COST 1 1 Project Management and Meetings Meetings a�th City (up to 4) 8 8 16 $2,248 Project Management 10 nio ) 20 I 1 10 10 40 $5314 1 r2 De*28 8 10 10 56 $7563 1 2 n Pro-Design (30 %) Basin Map 4 F4 8 $866 Hydrologic Modeling (WWHM4) 8 8 $858 Infiltration Facility Modelling (WWHM4) 12 12 $1,287 Cover Sheet with Vicinity and Lac Map 1 1 2 $217 Pvg and Drainage Plan and Profile (2) 2 16 32 50 $5561 Infiltrabon Facility/Paving Details (2) 2 8 32 42 $4703 30% Construction Cost Estimate 2 8 10 $1206 Pre - Design Report 2 30 8 40 $4285 Design (90% and Final) Cover Sheet with Vicinity and Loc Map Legend Abbr and Index 1 1 2 $283 Site Prep Demo & Traffic Control Plan (2 2 16 24 42 $4687 TESC & Traffic Control Details 2 8 8 18 $2080 Pvg and Drainage Plan and Profile (2) 4 16 16 36 $4160 Infiltration Fac111ty/Paving Details (3) 4 16 24 44 $5034 Retaining Wall Plan and Elevation 1 24 24 49 $7780 Retaining Wall Details 1 12 20 33 $5038 SHEETTOTAL 12 Special Provisions 4 16 12 32 $3492 Cost Estimates 4 16 2 22 $2591 0&M Manual 2 16 4 22 $2424 Expenses $500 Subtotal 33 191 142 36 44 26 472 $67053 1 3 181d Par*age Bid Set Drawings 4 16 24 4 4 52 $6302 Bid Set Special Provisions 4 4 4 12 $1484 Bid Set Contract Documents 8 4 12 $1751 Engineers Estimate 4 8 12 $1553 Subtotal 20 28 24 4 4 8 a $110" 1 4 IM=Rodn Sampling CAPP 1 8 9 $1032 Sampling Field Work 2 8 10 $1,206 Sampling Results Tech Memo 2 8 10 $1,206 Expenses $200 Subtotal 5 24 29 $3643 1 5 S urvey Survey and Base Map 2 16 40 58 $7607 Equip & Supplies I I 1 $400 Subtotall 2 1 1 58 $8007 Tasks 1 through 5 Subtotal 88 1 251 1 196 40 48 1 10 34 10 703 $87 356 Marine Drive Budget 020514 xlsx Page 1 PARAMETRIX EXHIBIT C - BUDGET 2/5/2014 Project Marine Drive Stormwater LID Retrofit Client City of Bremerton PMX11 BILLING STAFF Sr Eng Eng III CAD Strict Erg Strict CAD SurveyCNe1 Survey PC WP Acet 233 1896 873 MULT D Dinkuhn D Zavack J Petersen J MeM A Valencia B Pussy J Kemnez L Stevens L Edwards V Soleau TOTAL TOTAL PHASE TASK 325 Burdened Labor Rate $17381 $10725 $10930 $18428 $13267 $15626 $11898 $8694 $9003 $96.18 HOURS COST 1 S Directed Services Directed Services $10000 1 7 Subeonsuitards Geotechnmal Stantech $17500 Ublity Locates APS $400 Laboratory OnSdeEnvironmental $2600 Subtotal $20500 Direct Cost Fee ( % 10) $2050 Total Subconsugards $22,550 PROJECT TOTAL $119,906 Prepared By D Dinkuhn Rev By Phi Struck (Project Manager) (Senior Consultant) Marine Drive Budget 020514 xlsx Page 2 AGENDA BILL %A CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ■■ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee SUBJECT Public Hearing to approve Study Session Date February 12, 2014 Ordinance No 5240 establishing a COUNCIL MEETING Date February 19, 2014 Planned Action for the Gorst Urban Growth Department DCD Area Presenter Allison Daniels Phone 360 473 5845 SUMMARY The action before the Council is to conduct a public hearing and consider public testimony on the Planned Action Ordinance for the Gorst Urban Growth Area Subarea According to SEPA, a "Planned Action" is a designation for a project or elements of a project that shifts environmental review from the time a permit application is made to an earlier phase in the process The planned action analysis applies to the entire study area of the Gorst Urban Growth Area and addresses potential impacts and mitigating measures as a result of the Environmental Impact Statements analysis This action will support the Gorst Subarea Plan which was recently adopted by City Council in December 2013 under Ordinance 5237 ATTACHMENTS 1) Proposed Planned Acton Ordinance Exhibit A) Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Area and Site Map Exhibit B) Modified SEPA Checklist and mitigation measures Attachment 1) Mitigation measures Attachment 2) Applicable Regulations Exhibit C) Public Agency Actions and Commitments "Final EIS and Draft EIS can be located at www gorstwatershed com FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) None STUDY SESSION AGENDA ❑ No Presentation ® Full Presentation STUDY SESSION ACTION ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ® Public Hearing RECOMMENDED MOTION Move to pass Ordinance No 5240 establishing a Planned Action for the Gorst Urban Growth Area COUNCIL ACTION ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 01/25/13 ORDINANCE NO. 5240 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, establishing a planned action for the Gorst Urban Growth Area pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act WHEREAS, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and implementing rules provide for the integration of environmental review with land use planning and project review through designation of "Planned Actions" by jurisdictions planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA), and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA, and WHEREAS, to guide Gorst's growth and redevelopment, the City has engaged in extensive watershed characterization and subarea planning for Gorst and have adopted amendments to their Comprehensive Plan including the Gorst Subarea Plan, and WHEREAS, the City has received a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency's Watershed Management Assistance Program to develop a Comprehensive Watershed Plan for sustainable development and restoration of the Gorst Creek Watershed, and also received support from the participation of Gorst property owners, regional stakeholders, and government agencies including Kitsap County, and WHEREAS, the City approved a planned action ordinance (Ordinance No 5189) for part of the Gorst Creek Watershed for the South Kitsap Industrial Area, which was separately approved for a planned action in 2012, and WHEREAS, the City desires to designate a separate Planned Action for the full Gorst Urban Growth Area (UGA) which is a portion of the Gorst Creek Watershed, and WHEREAS, designation of a Planned Action expedites the permitting process for subsequent, implementing projects whose impacts have been previously addressed in a Planned Action environmental impact statement (EIS), and thereby encourages desired growth and economic development, and WHEREAS, the Gorst Planned Action EIS identifies impacts and mitigation measures associated with planned development in the Gorst UGA, and WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations and ordinances which will help protect the environment, and is adopting regulations specific to the Gorst UGA which will guide the allocation, form and quality of desired development, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Rules, set forth in BMC 20 04 205 provide for Planned Actions within the City, and 1 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance WHEREAS, the City as lead agency and County as a project partner provided public comment opportunities through an EIS scopmg period in October and November 2012, and for the Gorst Subarea Plan and Draft Planned Action EIS during June and July 2013, and held public meetings and hearings as part of a coordinated Gorst public participation program throughout 2013, and WHEREAS, the City provided legal notice of a community meeting on October 4, 2013 by emailmg to all affected federally recognized tribal governments and agencies with jurisdiction over the future development anticipated for the planned action, in compliance with RCW 43 21C 440, and WHEREAS, the City held a community meeting on October 15, 2013 in compliance with RCW 43 21 C 440, and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2013 the City provided notification of a public hearing to be held on December 18, 2013 to all parties of record and all affected federally recognized tribal governments and agencies with jurisdiction over the future development for the Gorst Subarea Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on December 18, 2013, considered public comment and approved the Gorst Subarea Plan and functioning plans as Ordinance 5237, and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2014 the City provided legal notice in the Kitsap Sun of a public hearing to be held on February 19, 2014 for the planned action, and WHEREAS, on February 3, 2014 the City provided notification of a public hearing to be held on February 19, 2014 to all parties of record and all affected federally recognized tribal governments and agencies with jurisdiction over the future development anticipated for the planned action WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on February 19, 2014 and considered public comment, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1 . Recitals The recitals set forth in this ordinance are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein SECTION Z Purpose The City Council declares that the purpose of this ordinance is to A Combine environmental analysis, land use plans, development regulations, City codes and ordinances together with the mitigation measures in the Gorst Planned Action EIS to mitigate environmental impacts and process planned action development applications in the Planned Action Area, 2 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance B Designate the full Gorst UGA as a Planned Action Area for purposes of environmental review and permitting of subsequent, implementing projects pursuant to SEPA, RCW 43 21C 440, C Determine that the EIS prepared for the Gorst Subarea Plan meets the requirements of a Planned Action EIS pursuant to SEPA, D Establish criteria and procedures, consistent with state law, that will determine whether subsequent projects within the Planned Action Area qualify as Planned Actions, E Provide the public with information about Planned Actions and how the City will process implementing projects within the Planned Action Area, F Streamline and expedite the land use permit review process by relying on the EIS completed for the Planned Action, and G Apply the City's development regulations together with the mitigation measures described in the EIS and this Ordinance to address the impacts of future development contemplated by this Ordinance SECTION 3 Findings The City Council finds as follows A The City is subject to the requirements of the GMA (RCW 36 70A), and is applying the Planned Action to a UGA [Urban Growth Area], and B The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA, and is amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate a subarea element specific to the Gorst UGA, and C The City is adopting development regulations concurrent with the Gorst Subarea Plan to implement said Plan, including this ordinance, and D An EIS has been prepared for the Planned Action Area, and the City Council finds that the EIS adequately identifies and addresses the probable significant environmental impacts associated with the type and amount of development planned to occur in the designated Planned Action Area, and E The mitigation measures identified in the Gorst Planned Action EIS and attached to this ordinance as Exhibit B, incorporated herein by reference, together with adopted City development regulations, will adequately mitigate significant impacts from development within the Planned Action Area, and F The Gorst Subarea Plan and Planned Action EIS identify the location, type and amount of development that is contemplated by the Planned Action, and G Future projects that are implemented consistent with the Planned Action will protect the environment, benefit the public and enhance economic development, and H The City and County provided several opportunities for meamngful public involvement in the Gorst Subarea Plan and Planned Action EIS, including a community meeting prior to the publication of notice for the planned action ordinance, have considered all comments received, and, as appropriate, have modified the proposal or mitigation measures in response to comments, I Essential public facilities defined in RCW 47 06 140 are excluded from the Planned Action and not eligible for review or permitting as Planned Actions unless they are accessory to or part of a project that otherwise qualifies as a planned action, and J The Planned Action applies to a defined area that is smaller than the overall City boundaries and smaller than overall County designated UGAs, and K Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed Planned Action, with implementation of Subarea Plan and mitigation measures identified in the EIS 3 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance SECTION 4 Procedures and Criteria for Evaluating and Determining Planned Action Projects within Planned Action Area A Planned Action Area This Planned Action designation shall apply to the area shown in Exhibit A, incorporated herein by reference B Environmental Document A Planned Action determination for a site - specific protect application within the Planned Action Area shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the Draft EIS issued by the City on June 10, 2013 and the Final EIS published on October 8, 2013 The Draft and Final EIS documents shall comprise the Planned Action EIS for the Planned Action Area The mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference, are based upon the findings of the Planned Action EIS and shall, along with adopted City regulations, provide the framework that the City will use to apply appropriate conditions on qualifying Planned Action projects within the Planned Action Area C Planned Action Designated Land uses and activities described in the Planned Action EIS, subject to the thresholds described in Subsection 4(D) of this Ordinance below ( "Planned Action Qualifications ") and the mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B, are designated Planned Actions or Planned Action Projects pursuant to RCW 43 21C 440 A development application for a site - specific Planned Action project located within Planned Action Area shall be designated a Planned Action if it completes the modified SEPA Checklist in Exhibit B and meets the criteria set forth in Subsection 4(D) of this Ordinance and all other applicable laws, codes, development regulations and standards of the City are met D Planned Action Qualifications The following thresholds shall be used to determine if a site - specific development proposed within the Planned Action Area was contemplated as a Planned Action and has had its environmental impacts evaluated in the Planned Action EIS (1) Quahfymg_Land Uses (a) Planned Action Categories The following general categories /types of land uses are defined the Gorst Subarea Plan and are considered Planned Actions i Mixed Use Retail, hotel, office, services, and attached single family, cottages, townhomes, and apartments in horizontal or vertical patterns ii Single Family Subdivision and Multifamily Residential detached single family, attached single family, cottages, townhomes, apartments, and accessory dwelling units, in clustered and non - clustered patterns iii Commercial Regional, community, and neighborhood commercial uses including retail, hotel, office, and services iv Open Space, Recreation Active and passive parks, recreation, and open space facilities Secondary uses include accessory commercial such as concessions, recreation equipment rental, and other small -scale facilities (b) Planned Action Uses A land use shall be considered a Planned Action Land Use when i it is within the Planned Action Area as shown in Exhibit A, ii it is within the one or more of the land use categories described in subsection 1(a) above, and iii it is listed in development regulations applicable to the zoning classifications applied to properties within the Planned Action Area A Planned Action may be a single Planned Action use or a combination of Planned Action uses together in a mixed use development Planned Action uses include accessory uses 4 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance (c) Public Services The following public services, infrastructure and utilities are also Planned Actions Multi -modal transportation improvements, water and sewer improvements, stormwater improvements, fish passage bamer removals, and habitat restoration proposals considered in capital plans associated with the Gorst Subarea Plan i Applicants for public services, infrastructure and utilities projects shall demonstrate consistency with the Gorst Creek Watershed Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, Bremerton Shoreline Master Program, and Bremerton Critical Areas Ordinance 11 Applicants for fish passage barrier removals and habitat restoration proposals shall demonstrate consultation with appropriate federally recognized tribes ill Essential public facilities defined in RCW 47 06 140 are excluded from the Planned Action and not eligible for review or permitting as Planned Actions unless they are accessory to or part of a project that otherwise qualifies as a planned action (2) Development Thresholds (a) Land Use The following amounts of various new land uses are contemplated by the Planned Action Feature Planned Action Area Residential Dwellings (units) 585 Commercial Square Feet 156,639 (b) Shifting development amounts between land uses in Subsection 4(1))(2)(a) of this ordinance may be permitted when the total build -out is less than the aggregate amount of development reviewed in the EIS, the traffic trips for the preferred alternative are not exceeded, and, the development impacts identified in the Planned Action EIS and are mitigated consistent with Exhibit B (c) Further environmental review may be required pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 172, if any individual Planned Action or combination of Planned Actions exceed the development thresholds specified in this Ordinance and/or alter the assumptions and analysis in the Planned Action EIS (3) Transportation Thresholds (a) Trip Ranges & Thresholds The number of daily vehicle and peak hour trips anticipated in the Planned Action Area and reviewed in the EIS is as follows Gorst Area Travel Statistics Category Daily Trips Peak Hour Trips Preferred Alternative — 2010 -2035 Trips 5,958 572 Note Based on Gorst area traffic analysis zones and the change in trips from 2010 -2035 Includes the No Action trips (4,114 daily and 395 peak hour), and the net increment of trips attributable to the Preferred Alternative (1,844 daily and 177 peak hour) beyond the No Action trips Source Kitsap County 2013 (b) Concurrency All Planned Actions shall meet the transportation concurrency requirements and the level of service (LOS) thresholds established in the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 11 12 BMC Transportation Development Code (c) Traffic Impact and Mitigation I Applicants shall prepare traffic impact analysis consistent with BMC 11 12 060 Traffic Impact Analysis Reports and the following A Traffic impact analysis reports are required for proposed development projects when the City Engineer or his/her designee has reason to believe that the 5 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance impact on the City's existing or planned future transportation facilities will be significant "Significant," for this purpose, means generating, on any portion of the City transportation system, in excess of two percent (2 %) more traffic above the existing base line at either the peak period or for the average day where the base line shall be determined by the City Engineer or his/her designee The City Engineer or his/her designee may require the traffic study to include any elements determined necessary in order to evaluate the nature and extent of appropriate mitigation measures The report shall contain quantification of existing traffic, including existing LOS circulation, and parking plus that for the site after the proposed project is constructed The analysis shall consider traffic impacts during the peak period If the development generates significant traffic volumes outside the peak period of the adjacent road system, the City Engineer or his/her designee will determine the appropriate time interval of the analysis The report shall also propose means to mitigate the impacts of the project in accordance with BMC 11 12 060 Traffic Impact Analysis Reports The traffic impact analysis shall be prepared by a Washington Registered Professional Engineer who is qualified in traffic engineering B While access to the north via Sherman Heights Road does not provide the most direct route to Werner Avenue and SR 3, this corridor (including Sherman Heights Road, Kent Avenue, 3rd Avenue and Union Avenue) shall be evaluated for spot intersection improvements to make this route and attractive route for traffic originating in the Gorst UGA to head north to avoid having to access SR 3 in central Gorst C While Werner road is north of the Gorst UGA, this roadway is considered an important route for Gorst UGA traffic to access SR 3 The Werner Road corridor between Union Avenue and SR 3 shall be evaluated as part of traffic impact analysis reports prepared for new development in order to optimize the traffic flow on this corridor ii Traffic mitigation shall be provided consistent with BMC 11 12 070 and as follows A The City Engineer or his/her designee shall impose conditions necessary to mitigate all impacts of traffic, circulation and parking resulting from a project For segments, intersections or other portions of the street system for which a LOS standard has been adopted within the current comprehensive plan of the city, mitigation measures shall be sufficient, in the estimation of the City Engineer or his/her designee, to assure that such segments, intersections or other portions of the street system continue to meet or exceed the adopted LOS standards after full project occupancy and operation For segments, intersections or other portions of the street system for where the present LOS is below the standard that has been adopted in the current comprehensive plan, the mitigation measure shall be sufficient in the estimation of the City Engineer or his/her designee to maintain or exceed the present LOS Mitigation measures may include, but are not limited to, channelization, intersection modifications, signal installation, modification, or replacement, installation of acceleration/deceleration lanes, turn lanes and medians B Required traffic mitigations related to LOS standard shall not require that an applicant mitigate portions of traffic not attributable to the project C The City Engineer or his/her designee may require the applicant to participate in the funding of mitigation measures required as a result of traffic impacts associated with development on the property in lieu of construction of the improvements if the City Engineer 1 or his/her designee determines that the delay in construction will not adversely impact the City Transportation System, and the best interests of the public would be better served by the delay 6 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance (d) Discretion The City Engineer or his/her designee or his/her designee shall have discretion to determine incremental and total trip generation, consistent with the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (latest edition) or an alternative manual accepted by the City Engineer at his or her sole discretion, for each project permit application proposed under this Planned Action (4) Elements of the Environment and Degree of Impacts A proposed project that would result in a significant change in the type or degree of adverse impacts to any element(s) of the environment analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, would not qualify as a Planned Action (5) Changed Conditions Should environmental conditions change significantly from those analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official may determine that the Planned Action designation is no longer applicable until supplemental environmental review is conducted (6) Substantive Authority Pursuant to SEPA Substantive Authority at BMC 20 04 010 and Comprehensive Plan Policies, impacts shall be mitigated through the measures included in Exhibit B E Planned Action Review Criteria (1) The City's SEPA Responsible Official may designate as "planned actions ", pursuant to RCW 43 21 C 030, applications that meet all of the following conditions (a) The proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit A of this ordinance, (b) The proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Planned Action EIS and "Planned Action Qualifications" set forth in Subsection 4(D) of this ordinance, (c) The proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of Subsection 4(D) of this ordinance, (d) The proposal is consistent with the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and the Gorst Subarea Plan, (e) The proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS, (f) The proposal's significant impacts have been mitigated by application of the measures identified in Exhibit B, and other applicable City regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required, (g) The proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and regulations, and the SEPA Responsible Official determines that these constitute adequate mitigation, and (h) The proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36 70A 200(1), unless the essential public facility is accessory to or part of a development that is designated as a planned action under this ordinance (2) The City shall base its decision on review of a Planned Action SEPA checklist (Exhibit C), or an alternative form approved by state law, and review of the application and supporting documentation (3) A proposal that meets the criteria of this section shall be considered to qualify and be designated as a planned action, consistent with the requirements of RCW 43 21 C 030, WAC 197 -11 -164 et seq , and this ordinance F Effect of Planned Action (1) Designation as a Planned Action Project by the SEPA Responsible Official means that a qualifying proposal has been reviewed in accordance with this Ordinance and found to be 7 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance consistent with the development parameters and thresholds established herein, and with the environmental analysis contained in the Planned Action EIS (2) Upon determination by the City's SEPA Responsible Official that the proposal meets the criteria of "Planned Action Qualifications" set forth in Subsection 4(D) of this ordinance and qualifies as a planned action, the proposal shall not require a SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to SEPA G Planned Action Permit Process Applications for planned actions shall be reviewed pursuant to the following process (1) Development applications shall meet all applicable requirements of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) Applications for planned actions shall be made on forms provided by the City and shall include the Planned Action SEPA checklist (Exhibit B) (2) The City's SEPA Responsible Official shall determine whether the application is complete as provided in BMC Chapter 20 02 (3) If the application is for a project within the Planned Action Area defined in Exhibit A, the application will be reviewed to determine if it is consistent with the criteria of this ordinance and thereby qualifies as a Planned Action project (a) The decision of the City's SEPA Responsible Official regarding qualification of a project as a Planned Action is a Type 1 decision The SEPA Responsible Official shall notify the applicant of his/her decision Notice of the determination on Type 1 decisions involving a planned action shall also be mailed or otherwise verifiably delivered to federally recognized tribal governments and to agencies with jurisdiction over the planned action project, pursuant to Chapter 1, Laws of 2012 (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill (ESSB) 6406) and RCW 43 21 C 440 (b) If the project is determined to qualify as a Planned Action, it shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedures specified in BMC Chapter 20 02, except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review shall be required (c) Notice of the application for a planned action project shall be consistent with Chapter 20 02 BMC (4) If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required by this ordinance See Subsection 4(G)(3)(a) regarding notice of the Type d decision (5) To provide additional certainty about applicable requirements, the City or applicant may request consideration and execution of a development agreement for a Planned Action project, consistent with RCW 36 70B 170 et seq (6) If a project is determined to not qualify as a Planned Action, the SEPA Responsible Official shall so notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure consistent with the City's SEPA regulations and the requirements of state law The notice shall describe the elements of the application that result in failure to qualify as a Planned Action (7) Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Actions may incorporate or otherwise use relevant elements of the Planned Action EIS, as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA requirements The SEPA Responsible Official may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non - qualifying project to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Planned Action EIS SECTION 5 Monitoring and Review A The City should monitor the progress of development in the designated Planned Action area as deemed appropriate to ensure that it is consistent with the assumptions of this 8 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance ordinance and the Planned Action EIS regarding the type and amount of development and associated impacts, and with the mitigation measures and improvements planned for the Planned Action Area B This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed by the SEPA Responsible Official no later than five years from its effective date The review shall determine the continuing relevance of the Planned Action assumptions and findings with respect to environmental conditions in the Planned Action area, the impacts of development, and required mitigation measures The SEPA Responsible Official shall also consider the implementation of Public Agency Actions and Commitments in Exhibit C Based upon tlus review, the City may propose amendments to this ordinance and/or may supplement or revise the Planned Action EIS SECTION 6 . Con act. In the event of a conflict between this Ordinance or any mitigation measures imposed thereto, and any Ordinance or regulation of the City, the provisions of this Ordinance shall control, except that the provision of any International Building Code shall supersede SECTION 7 Severabih If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect SECTION 8 Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law PASSED by the City Council the day of , 2014 GREG WHEELER, Council President Approved this day of 3 2014 PATTY LENT, Mayor ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk ROGER A LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of , 2014 EFFECTIVE the da�yy of , 2014 ORDINANCE NO 5a 7 0 9 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance EXHIBIT A GORST UGA PLANNED ACTION AREA 10 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance GORST AERIAL 1 UGA Boundary Q Gty Limits El Parcels �� Parcels v,a '0 _.��•, 1 .. Ile B ty �e Gorst UGA f 0.2 1 i II - I Ev I r s I sr 1 �'► � -A II ` �=. ±_� —('.' _ Jp I� �F — �� •4 4� �� o jl ......qwn � � M iles Qn ® Date Apill 2013 Sourei Dlgltal Globe Kitsap C , iunty Assessor 2012 BERK . EXHIBIT B MODIFIED SEPA CHECKLIST AND PLANNED ACTION EIS MITIGATION MEASURES Including: • Attachment B -1— Mitigation Required For Development Applications • Attachment B -2 — Advisory Notes to Applicants: Applicable Regulations 12 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance GORST UGA PLANNED ACTION ORDINANCE Exhibit B: Example Environmental Checklist and Required Mitigation Document INTRODUCTION The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires environmental review for project and non - project proposals that are likely to have adverse impacts upon the environment In order to meet SEPA requirements, the City of Bremerton issued the Gorst Planned Action Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on June 10, 2013, and the Final EIS was issued on October 8, 2013 The Draft and the Final EIS together are referenced herein as the "EIS" The EIS has identified sigmficant beneficial and adverse impacts that are anticipated to occur with the future development of the Planned Action Area, together with a number of possible measures to mitigate those significant adverse impacts On December 18, 2013, the City of Bremerton adopted Ordinance No ® establishing a planned action designation for the Gorst Urban Growth Area (UGA) studied as Planned Action in the EIS (see Exhibit A) SEPA Rules indicates review of a project proposed as a planned action is intended to be simpler and more focused than for other projects (WAC 197 -11 -172) In addition, SEPA allows an agency to utilize a modified checklist form that is designated within the planned action ordinance (see RCW 43 21 c 440) This Exhibit B provides a modified checklist form adopted in the Gorst Urban Growth Area (UGA) Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Document A Mitigation Document is provided in Attachment B -1, and also summarized in the environmental checklist Attachment B -1 establishes specific mitigation measures, based upon significant adverse impacts identified in the EIS The mitigation measures shall apply to future development proposals which are consistent with the Planned Action scenarios reviewed in the EIS, and which are located within the Gorst UGA Planned Action Area (see Exhibit A) Applicable Plans and Regulations The EIS identifies specific regulations that act as mitigation measures These are summarized in Attachment B -2 by EIS topic, and are advisory to applicants All applicable federal, state, and local regulations shall apply to Planned Actions, including the regulations that are adopted with the Preferred Alternative Planned Action applicants shall comply with all adopted regulations where applicable including those listed in the EIS and those not included in the EIS INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal The City of Bremerton will use this checklist to determine whether the project is consistent with the analysis in the Gorst Subarea Plan EIS and qualifies as a planned action, or would otherwise require additional environmental review under SEPA Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own project plans and the Gorst Planned Action EIS without the need to hire experts Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance A. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION Date Applicant Property Owner Property Address Street City, State, Zip Code Parcel Information Assessor Parcel Number Property Size in Acres Give a brief, complete description of your proposal Property Zoning District Name Building Type • Land Use ❑ Engineering • Building ❑ Other Permits Requested (list all that apply) All Applications Deemed Complete? Yes _ No Explain Are there pending governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Yes _ No _ Explain Existing Land Use Describe Existing Uses on the Site ❑ Mixed Use Retail, hotel, office, services, and attached single ❑ Commercial Regional, community, and neighborhood family, cottages, townhomes, and apartments in horizontal or commercial uses including retail, hotel, office, and Proposed Land Use — vertical patterns services Check and Circle All ❑ Single Family and Multifamily Residential detached single ❑ Open Space, Recreation Active and passive parks, That Apply family, attached single family, cottages, townhomes, recreation, and open space facilities Secondary uses apartments, and accessory dwelling units, in clustered and include accessory commercial such as concessions, non - clustered patterns recreation equipment rental, and other small -scale facilities # Existing Dwellings # Proposed Dwellings Units Proposed Density (du /ac) # Dwelling Type # Type Dwellings # Dwelling Type # Type Dwelling Threshold Total in Ordinance 585 Dwelling Bank Remainder as of 20_ dwellings Non - residential Uses Existing Proposed Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -2 Building Square Feet Employment Square Feet in Ordinance 156,639 Square Feet Remainder as of 20_ square feet Building Height Existing Stories Proposed Stories Existing Height in feet Proposed Height in feet Parking Spaces Existing Proposed Impervious Surfaces Existing Square Feet Proposed Square Feet Existing Estimated Trips Total Future Estimated Trips Total Net New Trips PM Peak Hour Weekday Vehicl Source of Trip Rate ITE Manual _ Other Transportation Impacts Determined Consistent with BMC Chapter 1112 Transportation Development Code e Trips Yes No Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing) Describe plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to this proposal List any available or pending environmental information directly related to this proposal Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND MITIGATION MEASURES Geology /Soils Checklist and Mitigation Measures Geology /Soils Checklist and Mitigation Measures 1 Description of Conditions STAFF COMMENTS A General description of the site (circle one) Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other B What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? C What general types of sods are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? 2 Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling Or grading proposed Indicate source of fill 3 Has any part of the site been classified as a "geologically hazardous" area? (Check all that apply) ❑ Landslide Hazards ❑ Erosion Hazards ❑ Seismic Hazards ❑ Liquefaction Hazards ❑ Other Describe 4 Proposed Measures to control impacts to earth, soils, and geologic hazardous areas including Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance Water Resources /Stormwater Checklist and Mitigation Measures Water Resources/stormwater Checklist and Mitigation Measures 5 Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, STAFF COMMENTS saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type of surface water body, including their name(s), stream classification, and whether there is a 100 -year floodplain If appropriate, state what stream or river the surface water body flows into 6 Will the proposal require or result in (check all that apply and describe below) ❑ any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? ❑ fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands? ❑ surface water withdrawals or diversions? ❑ discharges of waste materials to surface waters? ❑ groundwater withdrawal or discharge? ❑ waste materials entering ground or surface waters? 7 Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection, treatment, and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe 8 Is the area designated a critical aquifer recharge area? If so, please describe 9 About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 10 What measures are proposed to reduce or control water resources /stormwater impacts? The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Compliance with construction- related stormwater requirements, including temporary erosion and sediment control, and development and implementation of a stormwater pollution and spill prevention plan ❑ Determination of necessary permanent, long -term water quality treatment requirements ❑ Low Impact Development (LID) techniques employed, consistent with BMC 15 04 020 and the Gorst Subarea Plan? ❑ Adequate erosion protection at outfalls Other Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -5 Air Quality /Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Checklist and Mitigation Measures Air Quality /GHG Checklist and Mitigation Measures 11 What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal a) during construction and b) when the project is STAFF COMMENTS completed? Please describe and give quantities if known 12 What measures are proposed to reduce or control air emissions? The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications (check all that apply) • Air Quality Control Plans • Fugitive Dust Control Plan • Haul Traffic Scheduled Off Peak • No burning of slash or demolition debris • GHG reduction measures use • Other Explain Plants and Animals Checklist and Mitigation Measures Plants and Animals Checklist and Mitigation Measures 13 Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site STAFF COMMENTS • Deciduous tree Alder, maple, aspen, other • Evergreen tree Fir, cedar, pine, other • Shrubs • Grass • Pasture • Crop or grain • Wet soil plants Cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other • Water plants Water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation 14 Are there wetlands on the property? Please describe their acreage and classification 15 Is there riparian habitat on the property? 16 What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 17 List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site 18 Are there plants or habitats subject to Critical Areas and /or Shoreline Master Program? Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B-6 Plants and Animals Checklist and Mitigation Measures 19 Is the proposal consistent with critical area regulations, shoreline regulations, and requirements of the Gorst Subarea Plan? Please describe 20 Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, buffers, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Development application has considered wildlife corridors and connectivity ❑ Clearing of vegetation and construction activities are planned scheduled outside of breeding periods for sensitive bird species and migratory birds If not, rationale for not meeting scheduling requirements provided? Yes_ No_ ❑ Other Noise Checklist and Mitigation Measures Noise Checklist and Mitigation Measures 21 What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (example traffic, equipment, operation, other) STAFF COMMENTS 22 What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation, other)? 23 What measures are proposed to reduce or control Noise? The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Demonstration that site planning and building design to reduce noise impacts has been considered for noise sensitive developments • Noise barriers such as walls and earthen berms to mitigate noise from ground transportation, commercial and industrial sources • Conditions to limit noise consistent with Mitigation Measure 15 of Attachment B -1 • Construction noise control plan ❑ Other Hazardous Materials Checklist and Mitigation Measures Hazardous Materials Checklist and Mitigation Measures 24 Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or STAFF COMMENTS hazardous waste that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe 25 Describe special emergency services that might be required 26 What measures are proposed to reduce or control Hazardous Materials? Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -7 The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Provision of hazardous materials awareness training to all grading and excavation crews ❑ Provision of ccontingency plan to identify, segregate, and dispose of hazardous waste in full accordance with the MTCA ❑ Provision of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ❑ Provision of Spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plan ❑ Identification of all ACM and lead -based paint in structures prior to demolition activities ❑ Provision of additional studies to locate undocumented underground storage tanks and fuel lines before construction of specific development projects ❑ If property has been identified as having potential for contamination, site assessment has been conducted ❑ Other Land Use Checklist and Mitigation Measures Land Use Checklist and Mitigation Measures 27 What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? STAFF COMMENTS 28 Describe any structures on the site Will any structures be demolished? If so, what type, dwelling units, square feet? 29 What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 30 What is the current zoning classification of the site? 31 If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? 32 What is the planned use of the site? List type of use, number of dwelling units and building square feet 33 Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, including and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations ❑ Compliance with Gorst Subarea Plan ❑ Compliance with other applicable land use and shoreline policies and development regulations ❑ Other Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -8 Aesthetics Checklist and Mitigation Measures Aesthetics Checklist and Mitigation Measures 34 What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s)? STAFF COMMENTS 35 Would any views in the immediate vicinity be altered or obstructed? 36 Would the proposal produce light or glare? What time of day would it mainly occur? 37 Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 38 What existing offsite sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? 39 Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic or light and glare impacts, including Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations ❑ Compliance with Gorst Subarea Plan ❑ Use of Incentives for Height including public benefits in exchange for increased height? ❑ Compliance with other applicable land use and shoreline policies and development regulations ❑ Other Cultural Resources Checklist and Mitigation Measures Cultural Resources Checklist and Mitigation Measures 40 Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on STAFF COMMENTS or next to the site? If so, generally describe ❑ Condition to stop construction if resources of historic or archeological 41 Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be significance are found on or next to the site ❑ Condition if human skeletal remains are encountered during construction, 42 Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to historic or cultural resources, if any the contractor /project proponent will The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for stop work and make appropriate Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) notifications ❑ Applicant in High or Moderate Probability Areas has prepared a cultural resource study ❑ Budding is 45 years of age and is reviewed for eligibility for listing on state and national registers ❑ Other Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B-9 Transportation Checklist and Mitigation Measures Transportation Checklist and Mitigation Measures 43 Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show on STAFF COMMENTS site plans, if any 44 Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 45 How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 46 Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private) 47 How many PM peak hour vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? 48 Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Evaluate and mitigate roadways consistent with Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 D(3)(c) ❑ Evaluate and mitigate for impacts to West Belfair Valley Road consistent with Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan and Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 D(3)(c) ❑ Project is designed to direct traffic either north (Sherman Heights) or west (Sam Christopherson Avenue or West Belfair Valley Road) of the SR 3/ SR 16 function ❑ The Werner Road corridor between Union Avenue and SR 3 has been evaluated as part of traffic impact analysis reports prepared for new development in order to optimize the traffic flow on this corridor ❑ Other measures to reduce or control transportation impacts Public Services and Utilities Checklist and Mitigation Measures Public Services and Utilities Checklist 49 Water Supply Would the project result in an increased need for water supply or fire flow pressure? Can City levels of STAFF COMMENTS service be met? 50 Wastewater Would the project result in an increased need for wastewater services? Can City levels of service be met? 51 Police Protection Would the project increase demand for police services? Can City levels of service be met? Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -10 Public Services and Utilities Checklist 52 Fire and Emergency Services Would the project increase demand for fire and /or emergency services? Can levels of services be met? 53 Schools Would the project result in an increase in demand for school services? Can levels of services be met? Is an impact fee required? 54 Parks and Recreation Would the project require an increase in demand for parks and recreation? Can levels of services be met? 55 Other Public Services and Utilities Would the project require an increase in demand for other services and utilities? Can levels of services be met? 56 Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services The application includes the following mitigation measures as required in Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications and Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations (check all that apply) ❑ Capital Facility Plan has been considered, and development provides its fair share of the cost of improvements consistent with applicable local government plans and codes • Law enforcement agency has been consulted, and development reflects applicable code requirements • Fire protection agency has been consulted, and development complies with Uniform Fire Code • School district has been consulted, and appropriate impact fee has been provided, if applicable • Onsite park /recreation, or fee -in -lieu, or a park impact fee is required • Power can adequately service proposed development based on consultation with service providers • Proponents have verifiably determined location of utilities ❑ Proponents provide complete utility relocation or modification, where feasible, prior to project- specific construction • Proponents have prepared Stormwater Management Plan consistent with local government codes and Gorst Subarea Plan • Developer has coordinated with City to ensure that sewer lines will be extended to provide service to proposed development site • Developer will co- locate telecommunications facilities to minimize aesthetic impacts • Developer has planned for appropriate site landscaping to screen telecommunications equipment from surrounding properties and the public realm • Other Measures to reduce or control public services and utilities impacts Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -11 C. APPLICANT SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision Signature Date Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance s -12 D. REVIEW CRITERIA Criteria Discussion (a) the proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit A of this Ordinance, (b) the proposed uses and densities are consistent with those described in the Gorst Planned Action EIS and Section 4 D of this Ordinance, (c) the proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of Section 4 D of this Ordinance, (d) the proposal is consistent with the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and the Gorst Subarea Plan, (e) the proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS, (f) the proposal's significant impacts have been mitigated by application of the measures identified in Exhibit B, and other applicable City regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required, (g) the proposal complies with all applicable local, state and /or federal laws and regulations, and the SEPA Responsible Official determines that these constitute adequate mitigation, (h) the proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36 70A 200(1), unless the essential public facility is accessory to or part of a development that is designated as a planned action under this ordinance Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -13 Review Criteria The City's SEPA Responsible Official may designate "planned actions" consistent with criteria in Ordinance No I ` Subsection 4 E Determination Criteria Applications for planned actions shall be reviewed pursuant to the process in Ordinance No F I Section 4 G Requirement Discussion Applications for planned actions were made on forms provided by the City including this Gorst UGA Environmental Checklist and Mitigation Document The application has been deemed complete in accordance with BMC Chapter 20 02 The proposal is located within Planned Action Area pursuant to Exhibit A of this Ordinance The proposed use(s) are listed in Section 4D of the Ordinance and qualify as a Planned Action Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -14 E. SEPA RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL DETERMINATION A Qualifies as a Planned Action The application is consistent with the criteria of Ordinance and thereby qualifies as a Planned Action project It shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedures specified in , except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review shall be required I Notice shall be made pursuant to BMC Chapter 20 02 as part of notice of the underlying permits and shall include the results of the Planned Action determination If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required See Section 4 G(3)(a) regarding notice of the Type 1 decision The review process for the underlying permit shall be as provided in BMC Chapter 20 02 NOTE If it is determined during subsequent detailed permit review that a project does not qualify as a planned action, this determination shall be amended I Signature l Date B Does not Qualify as Planned Action The application is not consistent with the criteria of Ordinance I I, and does not qualify as a Planned Action project for the following reasons Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Actions may incorporate or otherwise use relevant elements of the Planned Action EIS, as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA requirements The SEPA Responsible Official may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non - qualifying project to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Planned Action EIS SEPA Process Prescribed Signature Date Exhibit B — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance B -15 EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT B -1 MITIGATION REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 16 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 Mitigation Required for Development Applications Note The following mitigation measures are taken from the Gorst Planned Action Final EIS The concepts are the same as the Final EIS but the description of the "potential mitigation measures" has been made more actionable or implementable, such as by specifying the responsible party or changing "should" to "shall' It also represents bringing In details from the Draft EIS where a discussion of mitigation measures was in some cases more extensive INTRODUCTION The City of Bremerton and Kitsap County issued the Draft Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on June 10, 2013 and the Final EIS on October 8, 2013 The Draft and the Final EIS together are referenced herein as the "EIS" The EIS has identified significant beneficial and adverse impacts that are anticipated to occur with the future development of the Planned Action area, together with a number of possible measures to mitigate those significant adverse impacts Please see Final EIS Chapter 1 Summary for a description of impacts, mitigation measures, and significant unavoidable adverse impacts A Mitigation Document is provided in this Attachment B -1, and it establishes specific mitigation measures, based upon significant adverse impacts identified in the EIS The mitigation measures in this Attachment B -1 shall apply to future development proposals which are consistent with the Planned Action scenarios reviewed in the EIS, and which are located within the Gorst Planned Action Area (see Exhibit A) Where a mitigation measure includes the words "shall' or "will," inclusion of that measure in project plans is mandatory in order to qualify a project as a Planned Action Where "should" or "would" appear, the mitigation measure may be considered by the project applicant as a source of additional mitigation, as feasible or necessary, to ensure that a project qualifies as a Planned Action Unless stated specifically otherwise, the mitigation measures that require preparation of plans, conduct of studies, construction of improvements, conduct of maintenance activities, etc, are the responsibility of the applicant or designee to fund and /or perform MITIGATION MEASURES Geology /Soils No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Water Resources /Stormwater 1 All applicants for construction shall comply with all construction- related stormwater requirements, including temporary erosion and sediment control, and development and implementation of a stormwater pollution and spill prevention plan 2 For all proposed projects, applicants shall prepare a stormwater analysis consistent with BMC 15 04 020 and the Gorst Subarea Plan and based on City conditions, implement to the satisfaction of the City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee the permanent, long -term water quality treatment requirements, necessary for all vehicle - accessible areas and redevelopments Large areas of landscaping or lawn, unless strict policies on pesticide and fertilizer use are adopted, shall also be subject to water quality treatment requirements 3 Water quality treatment shall consist of Low Impact Development (LID) systems or techniques, consistent with BMC 15 04 020 and the Gorst Subarea Plan, unless it can be demonstrated that such techniques are not feasible Applicants should consider the Best Management Practices modeled in the "Technical Memorandum HSPF Hydrologic Modeling and SUSTAIN Stormwater Modeling of the Gorst Creek Watershed," available for review at the Bremerton Community Development Department 4 Additional erosion protection improvements may be required by the City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee at project outfalls because of increased peak runoff rates caused by an increase in impervious surface 17 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 Air Quality Construction Emission Control 5 The City of Bremerton shall require all construction contractors implement air quality control plans for construction activities in the Gorst Planned Action Area (see Exhibit A) The City of Bremerton shall require all future developers to prepare a dust control plan that commits the construction crews to implement all reasonable control measures described in the Associated General Contractors of Washington's Guide to Handling Fugitive Dust from Construction Projects The air quality control plans shall include best management practices (BMPs) to control fugitive dust and odors emitted by diesel construction equipment 6 BMPs shall be used to control fugitive dust consistent with the air quality control plan required above Example measure may include, but are not limited to • Use water sprays or other non -toxic dust control methods on unpaved roadways • Minimize vehicle speed while traveling on unpaved surfaces • Prevent track -out of mud onto public streets • Cover soil piles when practical • Minimize work during periods of high winds when practical The following mitigation measures should be used to minimize air quality and odor issues caused by tailpipe emissions • Maintain the engines of construction equipment according to manufacturers' specifications • Minimize idling of equipment while the equipment is not in use 7 If there is heavy traffic during some periods of the day, applicants shall schedule haul traffic during off -peak times in order to have the least effect on traffic and to minimize indirect increases in traffic related emissions 8 Burning of slash or demolition debris will not be permitted without express approval from the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency GHG Reduction Measures 9 Table B 1 -1 Potential GHG Reduction Mitigation Measures lists a variety of mitigation measures that could reduce GHG emissions caused by transportation facilities, budding construction, space heating, and electricity usage (Ecology 2008) The table lists potential GHG reduction measures and indicates where the emission reductions might occur The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee)shall require development applicants to consider the reduction measures shown in in Table B 1 -1 Potential GHG Reduction Mitigation Measures for their projects and identify which measures are feasible and incorporated into their projects, and which measures are infeasible together with a rationale and explanation The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development applications to incorporate GHG reduction measures found to be feasible Table B 1 -1 Potential Greenhouse Gas Reduction Mitigation Measures Reduction Measures Comments Site Design _ Retain and enhance vegetated open spaces Retains or increases sequestration by plants Plant trees and vegetation near structures to shade Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and buildings---- _ _ purch ele and enhances carbon sinks Minimize building footprint Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and purchased electricity consumption, materials used, maintenance, land disturbance, and direct construction e missions Design water efficient landscaping Minimizes water consumption, purchased energy, and _u emissions fr om water m Minimize energy use through building orientation Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and purchased electricity consumption f Budding Design and Operations 18 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 Reduction Measures Comments Apply LEED standards (or equivalent) for design and Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and off- operations site /indirect purchased electricity, water use, waste dis posal Purchase Energy Star equipment and appliances for public Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and _a use _ pur electrici cons umption _ Incorporate on -site renewable energy production, including Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and ^ insta of photovoltaic cells - or other solar options pur chased electri consumptio _ Design street lights to use energy - efficient bulbs and Reduces purchased electricity - fixtures Construct "green roofs" and use high - albedo roofing Reduces on -site fuel combustion emissions and ma terials _ _ pur e co nsumpti on _ _ Install high - efficiency HVAC systems Minimizes fuel combustion and purchased electricity co nsumption Eliminate or reduce use of refrigerants in HVAC systems Reduces fugitive emissions Compare refrigerant usage _ before /after to determi GHG re duction Maximize interior day lighting through floor plates, ---- before /after natural /day lighting initiatives and reduces increased building perimeter and use of skylights, purchased electrical energy consumption - clerestories, and light wells Incorporate energy efficiency technology such as super Reduces fuel combustion and purchased electricity insulation motion sensors for lighting and climate- control- consumption efficient, directed exte lig hting__ Use water - conserving fixtures that surpass budding code Reduces water consumption _req uirements Reuse gray water and /or collect and reuse rainwater Reduces water consumption with its indirect upstream e lectricity req Use recycled building materials and products Reduces extraction of purchased materials, possibly reduces transportation of materials, encourages rec ycling a reduc o f solid wa disposa Use budding materials that are extracted and /or Reduces transportation of purchased materials manufactured within the regi Use rapidly renewable building materials Reduces emissions from extraction of purchased materials Conduct third -party budding commissioning to ensure Reduces fuel combustion and purchased electricity energy performance_ _ _ _ _ _ con Track energy performance of budding and develop strategy Reduces fuel combustion and purchased electricity to maintain efficien _ consumption Transportation Size parking capacity to not exceed local parking Reduced parking discourages auto - dependent travel, requirements and, where possible, seek reductions in encouraging alternative modes such as transit, walking, parking supply through special permits or waivers or Gorst- and biking Reduces direct and indirect VMT specific parking stand or ince Develop and implement a marketing/information program Reduces direct and indirect VMT that includes posting and distribution of ridesharmg/transit info rmation Subsidize transit passes Reduce employee trips during Reduces employee VMT peak periods through alternative work schedules, telecommuting, and /or flex time Provide a guaranteed - ride -home pr og ra m_ Provide bicycle storage and showers /changing rooms Reduces employee VMT 19 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 Reduction Measures Comments Use traffic signalization and coordination to improve traffic Reduces transportation emissions and VMT flow and sup pe destrian and bi cycle s afety Apply advanced technology systems and management Reduces emissions from transportation by minimizing strategies to improve operational efficiency of local streets idling and maximizing transportation routes /systems for f uel effici Develop shuttle systems around business district parking Reduces idling fuel emissions and direct and indirect garages to reduce congestion and create shorter VMT commutes LEED = Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, HVAC = heating, ventilation, and air - conditioning 10 In addition, other vehicle trip reduction measures and land- use - related GHG reduction measures have been published by various air quality agencies For example, Table B 1 -2 SMAQMD' Recommended Measures for Land Use Emission Reductions lists the emission reduction measures developed by SMAQMD, 2010 The table lists SMAQMD's estimated "mitigation points" value, where each point value corresponds to the percent reduction in emissions For example, a mitigation point value of 10 corresponds to a one percent reduction in land- use - related emissions SMAQMD developed this table to quantify reductions in criteria pollutant emissions, but the listed measures would also generally reduce GHG emissions The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee shall require development applicants to consider the reduction measures shown in in Table B 1 -2 SMAQMD Recommended Measures for Land Use Emission Reductions for their projects and identify which measures are feasible and incorporated into their projects, and which measures are infeasible together with a rationale and explanation The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development applications to incorporate GHG emission reduction measures found to be feasible Table B 1 -2 SMAQMD Recommended Measures for Land Use Emission Reductions Measure Mitigation Number Title Description Points Bicycle /Pedestrian/T Mea 1 Bike parking Non- residential projects provide plentiful short -term and long -term 0 625 bicycle parking facilities to meet peak s eason maximum dema 2 End of trip facilities Non - residential projects provide "end -of- trip" facilities including 0 625 showers, lock and ch space 3 Bike parking at bicycle parking is provided at apartment complexes or 0 625 multiunit condominiums without garages _ residen 4 Proximity to bike Entire project is located within 1/2 mile of an existing designated 0 625 path /bike lanes bike lane and project design includes a comparable network that connects the project uses to the existing offsite f 5 Pedestrian network The project provides a pedestrian access network that internally 10 links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site 6 _ Pedestrian barriers Site design and building placement minimize barriers to pedestrian 10 minimized access and mterconnectiwty Physical barriers such as walls, berms, landscaping, and slopes between residential and non - residential uses that impede bicycle or pedestrian circulation are eliminated 1 Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District 20 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 Measure Mitigation Number Title Description Points 7 Bus shelter for Bus service provides headways of one hour or less for stops within 025-10 existing transit 1/4 mile, project provides safe and convenient bicycle /pedestrian service access to transit stop(s) and provides essential transit stop improvements (i e, shelters, route information, benches, and _ l 8 Bus shelter for Project provides transit stops with safe and convenient 025 planned transit bicycle /pedestrian access Project provides essential transit stop service improvements (i e, shelters, route information, benches, and lighting) in anticipation of future transit service 9 Traffic calming Project design includes pedestrian /bicycle safety and traffic calming 025-10 measures in excess of jurisdiction requirements Roadways are designed to reduce motor vehicle speeds and encourage pedestrian and bicycle trips by featuring traffic calming features Parking Measures 10a Paid parking Employee and /or customer paid parking system 10-72 10b cash out Employer provides employees with a choice of forgoing subsidized 0 6-4 5 parking for a cash payment equivalent to the cost of the parking space to the employer 11 _ Minimum parking Provide minimum amount of parking required Special review of 01-60 parking required 12 Parking reduction Provide parking reduction less than code Special review of parking 01 -12 beyond code required Recommend a Shared Parking strategy 13 Pedestrian Provide a parking lot design that includes clearly marked and shaded 05 pathway through pedestrian pathways between transit facilities and budding _ pa _ _ entrance 14 Off street parking Parking facilities are not adjacent to street frontage 01 -15 Site Design Measures _ -- 15 Office /Mixed -use Project provides high density office or mixed -use proximate to 01-20 density tran _ 16 Orientation to Project is oriented towards existing transit, bicycle, or pedestrian 05 _ existing transit, corridor Setback distance is minimized bikeway, or _ pedestrian corridor 17 Orientation toward Project is oriented towards planned transit, bicycle, or pedestrian 025 planned transit, corridor Setback distance is minimized bikeway, or pedestrian corridor 18 Residential density Project provides high - density residential development ^y 10 -12 19 _ Street grid Multiple and direct street routing (grid style) 10 20 _ Neighborhood Make physical development consistent with requirements for 05-15 electric vehicle neighborhood electric vehicles access 21 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -I Measure Mitigation Number Title Description Points 21 Affordable housing Residential development projects of 5 or more dwelling units 0 6-4 0 component provide a deed - restricted low - income housing component on -site Mixed -use Measures 22 Urban mixed -use Development of projects predominantly characterized by properties 3 0 -9 0 on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent ph ysical desi 23 Suburban mixed- Have at least three of the following on site and /or offsite within X 3 0 use mile Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office 24 Other mixed -use All residential units are within % mile of parks, schools or other civic 10 uses Building component Measures _ T � - - -- -- �� — 1 25 No fireplace Project does not feature fireplaces or wood burning stoves 10 27 Energy Star roof Install Energy Star labeled roof materials �~ 05-10 28 Onsite renewable Project provides onsite renewable energy systems) 10-30 energy system 30� Solar orientation Orient 75 or more percent of homes and /or buildings to face either 0 5 north or south (within 30 degrees of N /S) 31 _ Non -roof surfaces Provide shade (within 5 years) and /or use light- colored /high - albedo 10 materials (reflectance of at least 0 3) and /or open grid pavement for at least 30 percent of the site's non -roof impervious surfaces, including parking lots, walkways, plazas, etc, OR place a minimum of 50 percent of parking spaces underground or covered by structured parking, OR use an open -grid pavement system (less than 50 percent impervious) for a minimum of 50 percent of the parking lot area Unshaded parking lot areas, driveways, fire lanes, and ^_ other paved areas have a mini albed_o_of 3 o greater 32 Green roof Install a vegetated roof that covers at least 50 percent of roof area 0 5 TDM a Miscellane Measu 33 Transportation Include permanent TMA membership and funding requirement so Management Funding to be provided by Community Facilities District or other Association non - revocable funding mechanism _ mem 34 Electric Provide a complimentary electric lawnmower to each residential 10 la wnmower buyer 99 Other Other proposed strategies, in consultation with project lead agency To Be Determined 22 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 Plants and Animals 11 The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development applications to consider wildlife corridors and connectivity when designing and permitting new developments within the Gorst Creek Watershed 12 All clearing of vegetation and construction activities shall be limited to times outside the breeding period for sensitive bird species and migratory birds, unless an applicant can demonstrate mitigation measures to avoid or minimize impacts Noise 13 All development proposals in the Gorst UGA shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee that proper site planning to reduce noise impacts has been considered for noise sensitive developmentS Measures may include but are not limited to • Increasing the distance from the noise source to sensitive receptors by creation of setbacks, • Placing non -noise sensitive uses such as parking lots and utility areas between the noise source and receiver, and • Orienting usable outdoor living space such as balconies, patios, and child play areas away from roadways • Orienting the building to place activities that are more noise tolerant to face the roadway or other noise source, and • Limiting the number and size, and properly locating doors and windows to benefit interior noise control 14 The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development proposals to provide noise barriers such as walls and earthen berms to mitigate noise from ground transportation, commercial and industrial sources Noise barriers can be used to reduce the noise level both outdoors and indoors 15 The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may condition development proposals to achieve the following • Provide hourly and maximum property line noise level limits for all mayor zoning districts defined in the Zoning Ordinance • Limit the hours of deliveries to commercial, mixed use, and industrial uses adjacent to residential and other noise sensitive land uses • Limit the hours of operation for commercial and retail to limit noise intrusion into nearby residential and other noise sensitive land uses • Limit noise levels generated by commercial and industrial uses • Limit outdoor industrial activities or operations to control excessive noise at adjacent residential properties • Limit the hours of operation of high noise - generating industrial equipment • Limit the hours of operation for refuse vehicles and parking lot sweepers if their activity results in an excessive noise level that adversely affects adjacent residential uses • Require the placement of loading and unloading areas so that commercial buildings shield nearby residential land uses from noise generated by loading dock and delivery activities If necessary, additional sound barriers shall be constructed on the commercial sites to protect nearby noise sensitive uses • Require the placement of all commercial HVAC machinery to be placed within mechanical equipment rooms wherever possible (Equipment manufacturer's specifications for venting and access to outside air shall be maintained ) Z As described in the Gorst Planned Action Draft EIS, noise sensitive receivers are generally considered humans engaged in activities or utilizing land uses that may be subject to the stress of significant interference from noise Activities usually associated with sensitive receptors include, but are not limited to, talking, reading, and sleeping Land uses often associated with sensitive receptors include residential dwellings, mobile homes, hotels, motels, hospitals, nursing homes, education facilities, libraries, and churches Parks and open space are also sometimes considered to be noise sensitive land uses Generally, outdoor areas of frequent human use are considered to be noise sensitive Industrial and commercial land uses are generally not considered sensitive to noise 23 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 o Require the provision of localized noise barriers or rooftop parapets around heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), cooling towers, and mechanical equipment so that line -of -sight to the noise source from the property line of the noise sensitive receptors is blocked (Equipment manufacturer's specifications for venting and access to outside air shall be maintained ) 16 All contractors shall prepare a noise control plan and implement the following measures during construction activities • Construction equipment shall be properly maintained per manufacturers' specifications and fitted with the best available noise suppression devices (e g, mufflers, silencers, wraps) • Construction operations and related activities associated with the project shall comply with the operational hours outlined in the City of Bremerton Noise Ordinance • Construction equipment shall not be idled for extended periods of time in the vicinity of noise sensitive receptors • Fixed and /or stationary construction equipment shall be located as far as possible from noise sensitive receptors (e g, generators, compressors, rock crushers, cement mixers) • All impact tools shall be shrouded or shielded, and all intake and exhaust ports on powered construction equipment shall be muffled or shielded 17 Where feasible, temporary barriers shall be placed as close to the noise source or as close to the receptor as possible and break the line of sight between the source and receptor where modeled levels exceed applicable standards 18 The City SEPA Responsible Official or his /her designee may consult Draft EIS Section 3 5 Noise for additional detail and guidance on the application of noise mitigation measures Hazardous Materials 19 Since encountering unreported spills or unreported underground fuel tanks is a risk when performing construction, Contractors shall be required to provide hazardous materials awareness training to all grading and excavation crews on how to identify any suspected contaminated soil or groundwater, and how to alert supervisors in the event of suspected contaminated material Signs of potential contaminated sod include stained soil, odors, oily sheen, or the presence of debris 20 Contractors shall be required to implement a contingency plan to identify, segregate, and dispose of hazardous waste in full accordance with the MTCA 21 Contractors shall be required to develop and implement the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, BIVIPs, and other permit conditions to minimize the potential for a release of hazardous materials to soil, groundwater, or surface water during construction 22 Contractors shall be required to follow careful construction practices to protect against hazardous materials spills from routine equipment operation during construction, prepare and maintain a current spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plan, and have an individual on site designated as an emergency coordinator, and understand and use proper hazardous materials storage and handling procedures and emergency procedures, including proper spill notification and response requirements 23 Contractors shall be required to identify all ACM and lead -based paint in structures prior to demolition activities in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35 If ACM or lead -based paint is identified, appropriately trained and licensed personnel shall contain, remove, and properly dispose of the ACM and /or lead based paint material according to federal and state regulations prior to demolition of the affected area 24 If warranted, contractors shall be required to conduct additional studies to locate undocumented USTs and fuel lines before construction of specific development projects (areas of concern include current and former commercial and residential structures) and will permanently decommission and properly remove USTs from project sites before commencing general construction activities 25 All applicants for development on properties identified as having potential for contamination shall conduct a thorough site assessment If contamination is discovered, the applicant shall be required to comply with all state and federal regulations for contaminated sites Land Use Patterns, Aesthetics, and Socio- Economics 26 Development proposals shall comply with the Gorst Subarea Plan development and design regulations that address • Allowed and prohibited uses /development types 24 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 • Minimum and maximum density • Budding height • Building setbacks • Maximum lot coverage • Maximum impervious area • Critical area buffers • Streetscape guidelines • Site planning guidelines • Design of the roadway, including width of travel, bicycle, and parking lanes • Design of the curb zone, which includes street trees and other amenities and infrastructure • The sidewalk • The transitional zone, which is the area between the sidewalk and edge of right -of -way • Building frontage elements such as the provision of weather protection where buildings abut the right -of -way • Building orientation, including the location of entrances • Budding fagade, including street - facing windows, budding articulation, and blank wall limitations • Parking and vehicular access, including location of parking, curb cuts, shared parking, and pedestrian accessibility Cultural Resources 27 A cultural resources study shall be conducted at the applicant's expense for specific projects within High Probability Areas (See Figure B 1 -1 and Table B 1 -3 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures) to determine if archaeological sites, traditional cultural properties (TCPs), or historic built environment resources are present that may be significant This should include but is not limited to background research, consultation with appropriate Tribes and interested parties, field study, and reporting A desktop review of existing background information regarding cultural resources shall be conducted at a minimum for projects within Moderate Probability Areas to determine if resources older than 50 years are present requiring evaluation and /or additional field studies See Figure B 1 -1 and Table B 1 -3 Table 3 10 -6 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures identifies the potential mitigation measures for significant cultural resources and when they should be completed Table B 1 -3 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures identifies the potential mitigation measures for significant cultural resources and when they should be completed 25 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -I Figure B 1 -1 Gorst Creek Watershed Cultural Resources Probability / f / �f Bremerrop 0 I L 1 1 Wn r , I o a ` Bremerton West�UGA r J 1 to i Gorst UGA - t. / r ✓ 1 t r lnla 1 s w ISO ' 7 o J ; Port Orchard U - CoM Mnnnitln ` IJ" 1 1 I S 'y- � 1 BremRtoo l ULID6 s / ? t i SKIA UGA ��ULID6' SKIA UGA SKIA UGA rbrtombaW A l ULID6 AhWI s / / ® p I 10 Yr 6 d� z Legend s O High Probability Area Road - Moderate Probability Area Railroad L _ Urban Growth Area - Stream ® City of Bremerton ® Wetland (WDFW /NWI) sp F= City of Port Orchard L —_. Waterbody 8 0 8 Q G o M a I® Date My 2013 0 05 1 Miles �G_ J Source Suquamish Tribe Department of Ecology Depan —MOf Fish Is Wildlife BERK 26 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 Table B 1 -3 Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure Description Timing A For future projects that are qualified as planned actions and that involve, Prior to Construction development, ground disturbance, and /or construction in the Study Area in areas shown as high or moderate probability on the predictive model map in Figure B 1 -1 Gorst Creek Watershed Cultural Resources Probability, the City of Bremerton shall determine if cultural resources are located in the specific project area (at the applicant's expense) This should consist of background research, a field visit (particularly for High Probability Areas), and consultation with the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) and the Tribes to determine if cultural resources (sites, buildings, TCPs) are located within the project area The following provides guidance for qualified planned action activities requiring land use, construction, or budding permits from the City of Bremerton and located within high or moderate probability areas i Areas with prior negative archaeological survey, no ground disturbance, or in 100 percent culturally - sterile fill 1) document reason no survey is required, 2) require no further review ii For all ground - disturbing projects not addressed in "i" above 1) consult statewide predictive model and tribal predictive model, 2) provide tribal notification, 3) if no known cultural resources are present, condition permit with standard inadvertent discovery language, 4) if known cultural resources are present, provide state and tribal notification, conduct survey, 5) In the event that a proposed project would disturb an archaeological resource, the responsible local government shall impose any and all measures to avoid or substantially lessen the impact, 6) if avoidance of the archaeological resource is not possible, an appropriate research design /treatment program must be designed and implemented with data recovery to occur prior to project related ground disturbance, 7) the avoidance of archaeological resources through selected of project alternatives and changes in design to avoid the archaeological resource would eliminate the need for measuring or mitigating impacts B In the event that a proposed development location within the Planned Prior to Construction Action Area (Exhibit A) contains a budding or structure at least 45 years of age that is not listed in the WHR or the NRHP, the project shall be required by the City of Bremerton to undergo a review at the applicant's expense to determine if the building/structure is considered eligible for listing on the State or National Registers If impacts cannot be avoided on a historic resource that is determined eligible for listing on either state or national historic registers, the responsible local government is required to consult with DAHP about mitigation options C If human skeletal remains are encountered during construction, the During Construction contractor /project proponent will stop work and the Kitsap County Sheriff, DAHP, and the necessary Tribes will be contacted immediately D If archaeological resources are encountered during construction, work During Construction must stop until state and tribal notifications are made and until a qualified archaeologist can assess the discovery and implement mitigation if necessary 27 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 Transportation 28 West Belfair Valley Road is projected to be operationally deficient prior to 2035 This roadway was identified in the 2012 Kitsap County UGA Remand SEIS and 2012 Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan as needing widening from 2 to 4 lanes All of the other County roadways within the Gorst Subarea have capacity to support the additional traffic associated with all three alternatives Planned Actions shall mitigate for their impact to this facility consistent with Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 D(3)(c) 29 Due to the lack of capacity on SR 3 and SR 16 within the center of Gorst as well as a variety of merging and diverging movements, All new developments or redevelopments shall be designed to direct traffic either north (Sherman Heights) or west (Sam Christopherson Avenue or West Belfair Valley Road) of the SR 3/ SR 16 function Planned Actions shall mitigate for their impact to this facility consistent with Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 D(3)(c) 30 To address increased pedestrian demand between the proposed residential areas and the waterfront commercial and recreational land uses, consideration shall be made by development applicants to construct grade- separated pedestrian overpasses that would connect the residential and walkable commercial areas that are on both sides of SR 3 and SR 16 The exact location(s) of these overpasses need to be determined in conjunction with any proposed highway improvements in this area Planned Actions shall mitigate for their impact nonmotorized modes consistent with Planned Action Ordinance Section 4 1)(3)(c) Fire Protection and EMS No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Law Enforcement No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Schools No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Parks, Recreation, and Open Space 31 The City shall require that master planned developments within the Gorst UGA provide parks and /or open space as part of the development in order to serve the residents of that development and offset the need for the City to acquire and develop additional facilities Libraries No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Power 32 Applicants shall consult with Puget Sound Energy and Cascade Natural Gas and provide evidence of their consultation with Puget Sound Energy and Cascade Natural Gas As development permits are issued for future development in the Gorst UGA, the City of Bremerton, Puget Sound Energy and Cascade Natural Gas shall be advised by the responsible local government of large development or redevelopment projects and allowed to provide input on their ability to adequately serve the project Solid Waste No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater 33 Proponents of development shall evaluate the effect of proposed utility relocations on other nearby utility infrastructure 34 Proponents of development shall determine the exact location and depth of utilities and work with individual utility providers to verify the location 35 Proponents of development in coordination with utility provides shall complete utility relocation or modification, where feasible, prior to project- specific construction to reduce operational risks and reduce any potential disruption of service 28 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 36 The City of Bremerton shall require that sewer lines are extended to provide service to remaining areas unsuitable for onsite septic service treatment, and shall require development applicants in the Gorst UGA to ensure adequate sewer service consistent with BCC Chapter 15 03 Telecommunications 37 Developers shall be required to co- locate telecommunications facilities wherever appropriate and underground infrastructure to minimize aesthetic impacts 38 Developers shall be required to use appropriate site landscaping to screen telecommunications equipment from surrounding properties and the public realm Relationship to Plans and Policies No mitigation required See Attachment B -2 Applicable Regulations and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments 29 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Attachment B -1 EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT B -2 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANTS: APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 30 Gorst Urban Growth Area Attachment B -2 ATTACHMENT B -2 Advisory Notes to Applicants: Applicable Regulations The Gorst Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) identifies specific regulations that act as mitigation measures These are summarized in Table B 2 -1 by EIS topic All applicable federal, state, and local regulations shall apply to Planned Actions Planned Action applicants shall comply with all adopted regulations where applicable including those listed in the EIS and those not included in the EIS Table B 2 -1 Summary of Applicable Regulations Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment 3 1 Geology /Sods • City of Bremerton Critical Area Ordinance • BMC Chapter 15, Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW) and LID Guidance Manual • International Budding Code as adopted by City of Bremerton 3 2 Water Resources • Surface water quality standards are implemented through the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 certifications, water quality modifications, and compliance with the standards in Chapter 90 48 RCW and WAC 173 -201A • Applications for water quality related permits include the Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (DARPA) process, and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits In addition there are shoreline and critical area regulations applied by the City and County • As a result of the National Marine Fisheries Services' (2008) biological opinion regarding Federal Emergency Management Agency flood management, future development in the 100 -year floodplam of study area streams, such as Gorst Creek, will require avoidance or mitigation to address loss of habitat function associated with that development 3 3 Air Quality • National Ambient Air Quality Standards EPA establishes National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and specifies future dates for states to develop and implement plans to achieve these standards • State Ambient Air Quality Standards The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) establishes state ambient air quality standards for the same six pollutants that are at least as stringent as the national standards, in the case of S02, state standards are more stringent Draft EIS Table 3 3 -1 National and Washington State Ambient Air Quality Standards lists the state ambient air quality standards for six criteria pollutants • Outdoor Burning Puget Sound Clean Air Agency State Outdoor Burning Regulations per Washington Clean Air Act at Chapter 70 94 743 RCW • Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( PSCAA) Regulations All construction sites in the Puget Sound region are required to implement rigorous emission controls to minimize fugitive dust and odors during construction, as required by PSCAA Regulation 1, Section 9 15, Fugitive Dust Control Measures All industrial and commercial air pollutant sources in the Puget Sound region are required to register with PSCAA Facilities with substantial emissions are required to obtain a Notice of Construction air quality permit before construction is allowed to begin • State of Washington Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Laws Washington enacted a new law establishing GHG reduction limits • City of Bremerton SKIA Subarea Plan A subarea plan for SKIA was adopted in 2012 A portion of the Gorst Watershed is located within the SKIA subarea The SKIA subarea plan contains development incentives and requirements to ensure sustainable development and reduce GHG emissions Attachment B -2 B -31 Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment 3 4 Plant and Animals • City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Environment Chapter • City of Bremerton Critical Area Ordinance • City of Bremerton Shoreline Master Program • Federal Regulations Multiple federal regulations that pertain to the protection of plants and animals and their habitat include the Endangered Species Act, CWA, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act 3 5 Noise • BMC Chapter 6 32 (Noise Levels) establishes limits on noise levels and durations of noise crossing property boundaries with the City of Bremerton • The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Criteria The FHWA has adopted criteria for evaluating noise impacts associated with federally funded highway projects, and for determining whether such impacts are sufficient to justify funding of noise abatement These criteria are specified in the Code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR 772), Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise The Washington State Department of Transportation ( WSDOT) has adopted the FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria for evaluating noise impacts and determining whether such impacts are sufficient to justify funding of noise abatement for roadway improvement projects with state funding Any roadway improvements that would occur within the study area that would use state or federal funding would be subject to State and /or FHWA policies and procedures for evaluating traffic noise impacts and noise abatement In cases where no state or federal funding is involved, the WSDOT and FHWA protocols are not applicable 3 6 Hazardous Materials • Federal Laws and Regulations Federal hazardous material and waste laws and regulations would be applicable to hazardous substances used, stored, or generated by the project These include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) (aka Superfund), and Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act Pursuant to regulations promulgated under Section 102 of CERCLA, as amended, release of a reportable quantity of a hazardous substance to the environment in a 24 -hour period must be reported to the National Response Center (40 CFR Part 302) • Washington State Hazardous Material and Waste Laws and Regulations These would be applicable to hazardous substances used, stored, and generated by the project The Model Toxics Control Act requires reporting of a release of any hazardous substance within 90 days of the release (or within 24 hours for releases from an underground storage tank [UST], WAC 173 - 340 -300) Cleanup activities at contaminated sites are conducted under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) and disposal of contaminated materials are conducted under RCRA • Washington Department of Safety and Health Asbestos Standards Demolition of older facilities may require asbestos and lead -based paint mitigation Under the Washington State Department of Safety and Health asbestos standards (WAC 296- 62, 296 -65, and 296 -155), thermal system insulation (pipe lagging, boiler insulation, etc ), surfacing materials (spray -on acoustical plasters, troweled on plaster coatings, etc ) and flooring materials (vinyl tile, sheet goods, etc ) are all presumed to contain asbestos in buildings built before 1981 unless these materials are shown not to contain asbestos by a certified contractor Demolition of asbestos in the project area is regulated by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (Article 4 Asbestos Control Standards) and requires an asbestos survey, a notification of demolition, verification that all asbestos was properly removed, and proper disposal of the asbestos - containing materials • Washington State Department of Commerce The Washington State Department of Commerce (WAC 365 -230), regulates certification, accreditation, enforcement Attachment B -2 B -32 Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment and compliance for firms and individuals to use lead -safe work practices when working on pre -1978 homes or child- occupied facilities The regulations apply to training and certification requirements for individuals and firms and to accreditation requirements for training programs 3 7 Land Use Patterns • Gorst Subarea Plan including design guidelines and development regulations for land use and stormwater • BMC Chapter 20 50, Landscaping • BMC Title 20, Land Use • BMC 20 14, Critical Areas 3 8 Socio- Economics • Chapters of the BMC and Comprehensive Plan include • BMC Title 20, Division III Zoning, with development standards in each zone as well as general and specific standards for particular uses • BMC Chapter 20 50, Landscaping • BMC Chapter 20 14, Critical Areas • Bremerton City Services Element of Comprehensive Plan 3 9 Aesthetics • Gorst Subarea Plan development and design regulations 0 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan • BMC Title 20 Land Use Shoreline Master Program (update adopted by City of Bremerton, currently in review by Ecology) – part of BMC Title 20 Land Use, Chapter 16 3 10 Cultural Resources • Governor's Executive Order 05 -05 Washington State Executive Order 05-05 — requires state agencies with capital improvement projects to integrate DAHP, the Governor's Office of Indian Affairs, and concerned tribes into their capital project planning processes • Chapter 27 44 RCW, Indian Graves and Records, provides for the protection of Native American graves and burial grounds, encourages voluntary reporting of said sites when they are discovered, and mandates a penalty for disturbance or desecration of such sites • Chapter 27 53 RCW, Archaeological Sites and Resources, governs the protection and preservation of archaeological sites and resources and establishes DAHP as the administering agency for these regulations • RCW 36 70A 020 includes a goal to "Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures that have historical, cultural, and archaeological significance " Cities planning under the Washington State GMA must consider and incorporate this historic preservation goal in their Comprehensive Plans and implementing development regulations • Chapter 68 60 RCW, Abandoned and Historic Cemeteries and Historic Graves, provides for the protection and preservation of abandoned and historic cemeteries and historic graves • City Historic Preservation Regulations The City of Bremerton has adopted historic preservation regulations to promote a special tax valuation to promote historic site rehabilitation and preservation and protect important archaeological and historic sites • City of Bremerton Shoreline Mater Program (SMP) The City's recently adopted SMP would, when approved by Ecology, include several protective measures including "a site assessment by a qualified professional archaeologist or historic preservation professional and ensure review by qualified parties including the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, and the Suquamish Tribe Archaeology and Historic Preservation Program" for properties with known cultural resources and "stop work" orders on any newly discovered cultural features with a requirement for notification of the State and tribes and an Attachment B -2 B -33 Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment assessment 3 11 Transportation • Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Laws Passed in 1991 as part of the Washington Clean Air Act (Chapter 70 94 RCW), the CTR law seeks to reduce workplace commute trips in the 10 most populous counties in the state This law requires that in designated high population counties, including Kitsap County and Bremerton, each employer with more than 100 employees will adopt a CTR plan Programs provide various incentives or disincentives to encourage use of alternative transportation modes other than the Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) City of Bremerton ordinances set goals for the reduction of SOV trips • City of Bremerton Roadway Standards, indicate that sidewalks are required on all roadway classifications The preferred location of the sidewalk is away from the roadway (separated by a landscape buffer) The minimum width of sidewalks in the City of Bremerton is five feet • City of Bremerton Non — Motorized Transportation Plan is a comprehensive document that provides an inventory and assessment of existing bicycle and pedestrian conditions with the City of Bremerton It also provides recommendations and strategies for system -wide improvements and opportunities to connect to regional systems such as the Mosquito Fleet Trail While the City of Bremerton Non - Motorized Transportation Plan does not specifically address the Gorst UGA, it does provide some routing options to the Mosquito Fleet Trail to provide and efficient non - motorized connection from Gorst to Bremerton • Washington State Department of Transportation ( WSDOT) Level of Service (LOS) Standards WSDOT sets LOS standards for use in evaluating the performance of Highways of Statewide Significance facilities based on RCW 47 06 140 (2), which in the Gorst UGA consist of all or portions of SR 3, and SR 16 The Table below presents the congestion indices for urban and rural highways (freeway and arterial types) that equate to an urban LOS D and a rural LOS C for peak -hour travel LO Standards for Highways of Statewide Significance Area / Facility Type LOS Congestion Index Urban Freeway D 10 Arterial D 10 Rural Freeway C 6 Arterial C 6 Source WSDOT 2010 The HSS standards make a distinction between urban and rural areas For urban areas, the standard is LOS D, whereas the standard is LOS C in rural areas Urban /Rural designation is based upon the federal urban area rather than by UGA • City of Bremerton Roadways LOS standards are as follows V= Volume and C= capacity • Maintain LOS E or better (v /C less than or equal to 10) in the SR 303 (Warren /Wheaton) corridor, Kitsap way (SR 310), Sylvan Way, and the Manette Bridge • Maintain LOS D or better (WC less than or equal to 0 9) on all other arterial streets in the City of Bremerton However, while the City identifies the LOS measures above in its Transportation Element, the City also notes that some state routes are subject to different standards " WSDOT sets LOS standards for Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS), including State Routes (SR) 304, 310 and 3 in the City of Bremerton " See the Attachment B -2 B -34 Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment discussion below for more information • Bremerton Transportation Development Code (BMC Chapter 11 12) The purpose of the Transportation Development Code is to implement the transportation element of the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan, and to provide an orderly process for the adoption, implementation, interpretation and modification of City of Bremerton transportation system development standards (Chapter 1112 020) The Transportation Development Code gives the City of Bremerton Engineer the authority to request traffic impact analysis reports for proposed development projects if there is reason to believe the impact on the City of Bremerton's existing or planned future transportation facilities will be significant The City of Bremerton Engineer shall impose conditions necessary to mitigate all impacts of traffic, circulation and parking resulting from a project For segments, intersections, or other portions of the street system for which a LOS Standard has been adopted, mitigation measures shall be sufficient to assure that such segments, intersections or other portions of the street system continue to meet or exceed the adopted LOS standards after full project occupancy and operation For segments, intersections or other portions of the street system for where the present LOS is below the adopted standard, the mitigation measure shall be sufficient to maintain or exceed the present LOS (BMC Chapters 1112 060 and 1112 070) Attachment B -2 B -35 Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment 312 Public Services 3 12 1 Fire Protection and a Fire Codes New development would be required to meet City of Bremerton EMS codes, as well as International Fire Code and International Budding Code regulations, regarding the provision of fire hydrants, fire flow, alarm systems, sprinklers, and emergency vehicle access a Mutual Aid Agreements Fire protection districts in Kitsap County have entered into agreements with the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to jointly fight fires on state -owned land and private forestland 3 12 2 Law Enforcement a Police department The department is maintained primarily through the general fund, which is funded through sales and property tax revenues The increased tax base associated with increased population and development would increase tax revenues and bonding potential, providing additional funding for law enforcement services and facilities 3 12 3 Schools a School District Six -year CIP School districts are required to plan for growth over time by regularly updating their six -year capital improvement program 312 5 Libraries a With additional development and population in the Gorst UGA, property tax revenues, which are the primary source of funding for the Kitsap Regional Library, would increase over time These additional revenues could be used to purchase additional circulation materials for the Downtown Bremerton and Port Orchard libraries to offset the additional demand generated by growth 3 13 Utilities, Water, f Wastewater, Stormwater 3 13 1 Power a All future development of energy resources and transmission facilities would be required to comply with federal and state laws, the regulations of the Northwest Power Planning Council, and the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) 3 13 2 Solid Waste a Coordination and monitoring at transfer facilities and RAGFs would be ongoing to ensure adequate solid waste capacity Service levels for curbside collection as outlined in the CFP would continue or improve to encourage recycling 3 13 3 Water, Wastewater a Safe Drinking Water Ad Sets national primary drinking water standards The act and Stormwater includes the designation of sole source aquifers The 1996 amendment identifies source water protection a Clean Water Act (CWA) Regulates discharge of stormwater from certain industries and municipalities NPDES permit or water quality discharge permit The EPA delegated the Department of Ecology the authority to implement these permits in Washington State a Drinking Water Regulations Chapter 70 116 RCW Directs the Washington State Department of Health to assure safe and reliable drinking water and protect drinking wells a Washington State Water Pollution Control Act Chapter 90 48 RCW Regulates various source control activities related to sediment management a City of Bremerton Comprehensive Wastewater Plan and Updates Ensures adequate existing and future wastewater capacity a City of Bremerton Stormwater Management Program Summarizes the actions to be taken by the City of Bremerton to fulfill its obligations as listed in the NPDES Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit a City of Bremerton BMC Chapter 15, Stormwater, SWMMWW and LID Guidance Manual Regulates for stormwater management associated with new development and redevelopment a Any future development would need to comply with applicable utility franchises and permits Attachment B -2 B -36 Topics in order of Final EIS Applicable Regulation or Commitment 3 13 4 • Future construction of telecommunications infrastructure would be required to Telecommunications comply with federal and state laws, including the regulations of the FCC, the provisions of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, as appropriate, the regulations of the BMC, and the KCC 3 14 Relationship to Plans • See Land Use Patterns and Exhibit C Public Agency Actions and Commitments and Policies Attachment B -2 B -37 EXHIBIT C PUBLIC AGENCY ACTIONS AND COMMITMENTS 38 Gorst Urban Growth Area Planned Action Ordinance Exhibit C — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance Exhibit C -1 Public Agency Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures Proposed Short Term Estimated Year of Concurrent Next Comp Plan Implementation and Actions Amendment Long Other Responsible Cycle or within Term Agency Department 5 years (upon annexation) Geology /Soils, Water Resources, Air Quality, Plants and Animals, Hazardous Materials, Land Use Patterns, Socio- Economics, Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, Transportation, Power, Telecommunications, Water, Wastewater, Stormwater Adoption and implementation of Gorst X City of Bremerton Subarea Plan, and Gorst Creek and Kitsap County Watershed Characterization & 2013 Framework Plan Noise BMC Chapter 6 32 (Noise Levels) X City of Bremerton establishes limits on noise levels and 2016 or upon durations of noise crossing property annexation boundaries with the City of Bremerton Permissible noise levels at a receiving land use depend on the Noise Control District classification of the both the sound source and the receiving property The City of Bremerton Noise Control District classifications for land use zones will need to be updated with the new zoning classifications to be applied in Gorst through the subarea plan Public Services Fire Protection and EMS If the City of Bremerton experiences X Timing of this unexpected demand needs due to coordination would annexation of Gorst, the City of depend on the rate of Bremerton could work with South development in the Kitsap Fire and Rescue (SKFR) to Gorst UGA develop a Mutual Aid Agreement to Coordination would serve the Gorst UGA area This occur between the agreement could include information City of Bremerton on sharing levy revenues generated and SKFR within the Gorst UGA boundaries Upon amendment of the Countywide X X City of Bremerton in Planning Policies to reallocate consultation with population to Gorst or upon Kitsap County and annexation, the City Capital Facilities KRCC Plan should be amended to reflect Consider for 2016 updated level of service analysis Plan Update cycle included in the Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, and Gorst Planned Action EIS (October 2013) Exhibit C — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance C 2 Mitigation Measures Proposed Short Term Estimated Year of Concurrent Next Comp Plan Implementation and Actions Amendment Long Other Responsible Cycle or within Term Agency Department 5 years (upon annexation) Law Enforcement Upon amendment of the Countywide X City of Bremerton in Planning Policies to reallocate consultation with population to Gorst or upon Kitsap County and annexation, the City Capital Facilities KRCC Plan should be amended to reflect Consider for 2016 updated level of service analysis Plan Update cycle included in the Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, and Gorst Planned Action EIS (October 2013) The City of Bremerton and Kitsap X Impacts to levels of County could pursue implementation service would be of mutual aid agreements if increasing assessed continually Gorst population impacts levels of and coordination service between City of Bremerton and Kitsap County would be on- going Schools To address enrollment changes on an X The School district ongoing basis, prior to reaching the would determine its level of demand that would necessitate demands on an construction of a new facility, districts ongoing basis can use portable classrooms to temporarily meet growth demands Portables can be funded by impact fees paid by residential developers The City, Kitsap County, and school X City County, and districts could work together to school district identify potential sites for new school coordination would development in areas where higher be ongoing amounts of growth are planned The City's regular review of the Capital X X City of Bremerton in Facilities Plan (CFP) in coordination consultation with with the school districts should allow Kitsap County and for ongoing long -range planning for KRCC educational services Consider for 2016 Upon amendment of the Countywide Plan Update cycle Planning Policies to reallocate population to Gorst or upon annexation, the City Capital Facilities Plan should be amended to reflect updated level of service analysis included in the Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, and Gorst Planned Action EIS (October 2013) Exhibit C — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance C -3 Mitigation Measures Proposed Short Term Estimated Year of Concurrent Next Comp Plan Implementation and Actions Amendment Long Other Responsible Cycle or within Term Agency Department 5 years (upon annexation) Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Upon amendment of the Countywide X City of Bremerton in Planning Policies to reallocate consultation with population to Gorst or upon Kitsap County and annexation, the City Capital Facilities KRCC Plan should be amended to reflect Consider for 2016 updated level of service analysis Plan Update cycle included in the Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization & Framework Plan, Gorst Subarea Plan, and Gorst Planned Action EIS (October 2013) Libraries The Kitsap Regional Library could X Ongoing assessment partner with the Cities of Bremerton Kitsap Regional and Port Orchard to acquire additional Library circulation materials or expand their local branches to accommodate growth in Gorst The Kitsap Regional Library could X Ongoing assessment increase the amount of circulation Kitsap Regional materials and services that are Library available online to reduce demand for physical library space and offset new growth in Gorst Utilities, Water, Wastewater, Stormwater Solid Waste Based on available landfill capacity at X Kitsap County in the County's current contracted landfill consultation with location a new or extended contract other agencies could be enacted to provide landfill including City of capacity well beyond the 2035 Bremerton planning horizon Relationship to Plans and Policies Gorst Creek Watershed X City of Bremerton Characterization & Framework Plan Kitsap County and Gorst Subarea Plan are submitted 2013 to the Washington State Department of Commerce The Gorst Subarea Plan and associated X EIS contain a land capacity analysis The County and City of Bremerton X X Prior to 2016 could work with KRCC to reallocate Mineral Population City of Bremerton population from undersized UGAs to Resource and Kitsap County Gorst to match Preferred Alternative Designation population levels This could be accomplished prior to the County and City of Bremerton's GMA required 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update Exhibit C — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance C -a Mitigation Measures Proposed Short Term Estimated Year of Concurrent Next Comp Plan Implementation and Actions Amendment Long Other Responsible Cycle or within Term Agency Department 5 years (upon annexation) Until that time, the mineral resources designation in the Kitsap County plan could remain while the mine is still in active operation, thus not allowing residential growth until population targets are reallocated City regulations allow for mining to continue until such time as reclamation and redevelopment occur The Gorst Subarea Plan includes X City of Bremerton coordinated shoreline and critical area 2013 standards with the Gorst Creek Management Overlay to apply upon City Annexation Exhibit C — Gorst Planned Action Ordinance C -5 Christine Grenier From Christine Grenier on behalf of City Council Sent Thursday, February 13, 2014 4 31 PM To City Council Subject Planned Action Ordinance - Response to Study Session Questions Attachments BEDSreport_HiRes_021612 pdf Council Members, Allison has provided a response below to questions asked by Council Members during last night's Study Session Due to the size of the attached report, a copy will be available in the office for review Christine From. Allison Daniels Sent. Thursday, February 13, 2014 4 07 PM To: City Council Cc: Patty Lent, Andrea Spencer Subject. Planned Action Ordinance - Study Session Questions Lori or Christine, can you please forward this to City Council? Thank you Good Afternoon City Council, There were a few inquiries from last night's study session on the Planned Action Ordinance for the Gorst Urban Growth Area Below is further information from the discussion last night • Several questions included discussion on the traffic concerns and potential widening of State Route 3 & SR 16 As the Mayor mentioned, the Gorst Subarea Plan did utilize the Bremerton Economic Development Study (BED Study) which has been attached for your convenience The Bed Study is a planning effort between WSDOT, agencies and the local jurisdictions to assess the current and future transportation needs within the study area and provide recommendation to address short-term and long -term safety and mobility decencies which was published in March 2012 The study area did include the Gorst urban growth area Our current Gorst Subarea Plan is consistent with the BED Study In addition, the Gorst Subarea Plan (SAP), which can be located at www gorstwatershed com, states the development standards for the specific zones As shown in Chapter 8, Table 8 -1 Density and Dimensional Standards, there are front yard setbacks allocated for the different zones fronting on the State Routes, however setbacks may be increased when "fronting on an arterial or state route" Staff is available to help with any questions on the Subarea Plan, however please note that the Subarea Plan was adopted by City Council in December 2013 and is not subject to be revised by this process for the planned action • Within the PowerPoint, it was discussed the different thresholds of development for the Planned Action Ordinance This included the traffic trips generated for the projects and it was asked if that those trips accounted for the Highway and the local roads Clarification of this will be addressed in the upcoming Hearing • Councilman Runyon commented on Exhibit -C, Public Agency Actions and Commitments, should be required at the point of annexation Exhibit C has been revised to state as such and the updated exhibit will be in the Council's packets for the public hearing 1 If you should have any further questions, please feel free to contact me Best, AM-50n pan-W5 Senior Planner Phone 360 473 5845 Allison Daniels@ci bremerton wa us City of Bremerton Department of Community Development 345 6th Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337 2 A; F Washington State Department of Transportation Br emerton Deve St ud y Kitsap and Mason Counties, Washington US 101 SR 3, and SR 16 ;� , pis Bremerton Port Orchard Mason County � ry GOrst Belfair'�' r 30 Kitsap County 1 / § King County w� Allyn�� f l� T £ Piorce County f t \ ° s� 1 0 m Shelton FINAL REPORT March 2012 Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportations ( WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall on the grounds of race color national origin or sex as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 be excluded from participation in be denied the benefits of or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated may file a complaint with WSDOT s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and /or information regarding our non - discrimination obligations please contact OED's Title VI Coordinators, George Laue at (509) 324 -6018 or Jonte Sulton at (360) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information Materials can be provided in alternative formats large print Braille cassette tape or on computer disk for people with disabilities by calling the ADA/504 Compliance Manager Shawn Murmko at (360) 705 -7097 Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact OEO through the Washington Relay Service at 7 -1 -1 12 -02 -1165 i Bremerton Economic Development Study Kitsap and Mason Counties, Washington US 101, SR 3, and SR 16 FINAL REPORT March 2012 Prepared by Washington State Department of Transportation In Association with H W Lochner, Inc Envirolssues, Inc Acknowledgements The following agencies and organizations participated in the Bremerton Economic Develop- ment Study The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) would like to acknowledge and thank everyone involved Stakeholders Allyn Community Association Mason County Bremerton Chamber of Commerce Mason County Transit City of Bremerton North Mason Chamber of Commerce City of Port Orchard Port of Allyn City of Shelton Port of Bremerton Economic Development Council of Mason County Port of Shelton Kitsap County Puget Sound Naval Ship Yard Kitsap Economic Development Alliance Shelton -Mason County Chamber Kitsap Transit of Commerce Washington State Department of Transportation Paula Hammond, Secretary of Transportation Kevin Dayton, Regional Administrator Troy Cowan, Asst Reg Adm. for Project Dev Bob Jones, Transportation Planning Manager T J Nedrow, Transportation Planning Specialist 3 Bill Elliott, Protect Engineer - Belfair Projects Chris Picard, Manager, Urban Planning Office Richard Warren, BEDS Project Manager Consultant Team H W Lochner, Inc, Prime Consultant EnviroIssues, Inc, Public Involvement S Washington State Department of Transportation Olympic Region 6 } Bremerton Economic Development Study US 101 SR 3, and SR 16 in Kitsap and Mason Counties F Approved by. Kevin Dayton Date WSDOT Olympic Region Administrator Concurrence: a�� �3 •s7.�Z ay AI xander Date Di r, Capital Program Development & Management, Headquarters 3 -28 -12 Scott Zeller Date Assistant State Design Engineer, Headquarters Brian Smith V Date Director, Strategic Planning and Programming This page intentionally left blank Br emerton Economic Development Study Contents Executive Summary 1 What is the Bremerton Economic Development Study? 1 Who was involved in the study? 2 What is the long -range vision for the corridor? 3 What are the goals for the corridor? 3 What are the recommended improvements? 4 Chapter 1 - Project Overview 7 What is the purpose of the Bremerton Economic Development Study (BEDS)? 7 What are the origins of BEDS? 7 What is the study area assessed in BEDS? g What information is contained in the plan? 10 What is the study process? 11 How have local agencies been involved in the study? 12 How has the public been involved in the process? 12 What transportation issues does the plan address? 14 What are the top recommended improvements? 16 What are the next steps? 17 Chapter 2 - Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis .19 How were the study corridors analyzed? 19 How are the study corridors designated and classified? 22 What are the physical characteristics of the study corridors? 25 What multimodal facilities and other transportation services are available along the study corridors? 33 What are the land uses in the study area? 36 What are the population growth trends In the study area? 37 What are the environmental conditions within the study area? 39 What is the safety analysis along the study corridors? 40 How are safety Issues being addressed? 43 March 2012 - Final Bremerton Economic Development Study Chapter 3 - Existing and Future Traffic Conditions .45 How was the traffic analysis conducted? 45 5 What are the existing traffic conditions along the study corridors? 48 What are the future traffic conditions? 52 Where are the existing and future bottlenecks and congested areas? 58 Was a Sinclair Inlet Bridge analyzed? 59 Chapter 4 - Study Corridors Long -Range Vision 65 How were the study corridors long -range visions developed? 65 What is the long -range vision for the corridor? 66 What is the vision for Segment 1 66 What is the vision for Segment 2 69 What is the vision for Segment 3 71 What is the vision for Segment 4? 75 Chapter 5 - Recommended Improvements 79 How were the potential improvements identified? 79 How were the potential improvements evaluated? 79 What are the evaluation results? 84 How were the improvements prioritized? 92 What are the recommended 2020 improvements? 93 Are there other associated recommendations? 103 How will the improvements be implemented? 105 What are the long -term (beyond 2020) improvements? 117 Chapter 6 - Next Steps . 119 What are the next steps? 119 What are the State's Transportation Policy Goals? 120 Washington Transportation Plan (WTP) - 2007 -2026 121 Highway System Plan (HSP) 121 Why are regional plans important? 122 Why are local agency plans important? 123 For which funding sources could the recommended projects compete? 123 March 2012 -Final �� Bremerton Economic Development Study List of Exhibits Exhibit No Exhibit Name Page 1 -1 Study Area 9 2 -1 Corridor Segments 21 2 -2 Access Control Types 23 2 -3 Access Controls 24 2 -4 Summary of Physical Characteristics 26 2 -5 Speed Limits 27 2 -6 Intersection Locations for Analysis & Type of Traffic Control 28 2 -7 Intersection Summary 29 2 -8 Summary of Bridge and Structure Data 32 2 -9 Transit Routes and Park & Ride Locations 34 2 -10 Population Growth by Cities in the Study Area 37 2 -11 Incorporated Area and Unincorporated Area Population Increase (1990 -2009) 38 3 -1 Congestion Measurement for State Highways 46 3 -2 Intersection LOS standards 47 3 -3 2008 Annual Average Daily Traffic Summary 50 3 -4 2008 Traffic Conditions Summary 51 3 -5 2020/2030 Average Daily Traffic Summary 54 3 -6 2020 Traffic Conditions Summary 56 3 -7 2030 Traffic Conditions Summary 57 3 -8 2030 Sinclair Inlet Area Traffic Volumes without New Bridge 61 3 -9 2030 Sinclair Inlet Area Traffic Volumes with New Bridge 62 March 2012 - Final iii Bremerton Economic Development Study I Exhibit No Exhibit Name Page 4 -1 Segment 1 - Section A 66 4 -2 Segment 1 - Section B 67 4 -3 Segment 1 - Section C 67 4 -4 Segment 1 - Section D 68 4 -5 Segment 2 - Section A 69 4 -6 Segment 2 - Section B 70 4 -7 Segment 3 - Section A 71 4 -8 Segment 3 - Section B 72 4 -9 Segment 3 - Section C 73 4 -10 Segment 3 - Section D 74 4 -11 Segment 4 - Section A 75 4 -12 Segment 4 - Sections B & C 76 4 -13 Segment 4 - Section D 77 5 -1 Summary of Project Evaluation Scoring 85 5 -2 Priority of Corridor Improvements 95 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix 106 5 -4 Additional Long -Range Projects to Meet Transportation Needs Beyond 2020 118 March 2012 -Final iv Bremerton Economic Development Study ACRONYMS AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic GIS Geographical Information Systems AASHTO American Association of State HCM Highway Capacity Manual Highway and Transportation Officials HCS Highway Capacity Software AAWDT Annual Average Weekday Traffic HNS Highway of National Significance ADT Average Daily Traffic HSP Washington State Highway System ARM Accumulated Route Mile Plan ATR Automatic Traffic Recorder HSS Highway of Statewide Significance AWSC All Way Stop Controlled ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization BEDS Bremerton Economic Development ID Identification Study ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe LOS Level -of- Service (Railway) MP Milepost CARA Critical Aquifer Recharge Area N/A Not applicable CCTV Closed Circuit Television NB Northbound CWG Corridor Working Group NBL Northbound left -turn DAHP Department of Archaeology and NBR Northbound right -turn Historic Preservation EB Eastbound NBT Northbound through- movement EBL Eastbound left -turn NEPA National Environmental Policy Act EBR Eastbound right -turn NFIP National Flood Insurance Program EBT Eastbound through- movement NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric EMME /2 Equilibre Multimodal, Administration Multimodal Equilibrium N/O North of E/O East of NRHP National Register of Historic Places FEMA Federal Emergency Management NWI National Wetland Inventory Agency O &D Origin and Destination FGTS Washington State Freight and Goods OC Overcrossmg Transportation System OFM Washington State Office of Financial FHWA Federal Highway Administration Management FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Maps PAL Pedestrian Accident Location March 2012 - Final v ACRONYMS — continued P &R Park & Ride USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service PHS Priority Habitat and Species USGS United States Geological Survey PSRC Puget Sound Regional Council US 101 United States Route 101 RCW Revised Code of Washington VMS Vehicle Management Systems SB Southbound WB Westbound SBL Southbound left -turn WBL Westbound left -turn SBR Southbound nght -turn WBR Westbound nght -turn SBT Southbound through- movement WBT Westbound through- movement SEPA State Environmental Policy Act WDFW Washington State Department of S/O South of Fish and Wildlife SR State Route WDNR Washington State Department of SR 3 State Route 3 Natural Resources SR 16 State Route 16 W/O West of SRMP State Route Milepost WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone WSF Washington State Femes TWSC Two -Way Stop Controlled WTP Washington State Transportation Plan UC Undercrossmg Bremerton Economic Development Study Executive Summary What is the Bremerton Economic Development Study? The Bremerton Economic Development Study (BEDS) is a planning study focused within the South Kitsap/North Mason County area The study corridors are comprised of the following three principal highways and has a total length of approximately 47 1 miles • US 101, beginning at the intersection of State Route (SR) 102 north of Shelton and continuing southward to its intersection with SR 3, • SR 3, beginning at the intersection of US 101 and continuing northeastward through Shelton, Allyn, Belfair, and Gorst, ending at the intersection with Loxie Eagans Boulevard in Bremerton, and • SR 16, beginning at the intersection of SR 3 in Gorst and continuing southeastward to the intersection with SR 160 in Port Orchard (Sedgwick Road) These highways provide regional access for Mason and IGtsap Counties and are the primary commercial, freight, military and recreational travel routes within and through these counties The highways are part of the federal National Highway System (NHS) and classified as part of Washington State's Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS) system The study has its origins in a July 8, 2004 transportation summit hosted by the Port of Bremerton The purpose of the summit was to determine how to address transportation and economic issues in the south Kitsap County area, especially in regards to the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) Recognizing the need to develop a coordinated and comprehensive plan outlining current and future transportation needs community leaders agreed to fund a study to develop such a plan The cities of Bremerton, Port Orchard, Kitsap County, and the Ports of Allyn, Bremerton, and Shelton contributed a total of $173,500 to help fund a study Additionally, in 2007 the state legislature appropriated $500,000 (ESHB 1094) for "the SR3 /SR16 corridor March 2012 - Final 1 Br Econo Development Study study to plan and prioritize state and local improvements needed over the next 10 -20 years to support safety, capacity development, and economic development within the corridor " This $673,500 total funded the Bremerton Economic Development Study The study efforts, beginning in March 2008, were led by the Urban Planning Office of the Washington State Department of Transportation with assistance from a private transportation consulting firm, H W Lochner Who was involved in the study? The Washington State Department of Transportation ( WSDOT) and its consultants were assisted throughout the study by a stakeholders group At the beginning of the study WSDOT formed this stakeholders group to help provide input and guidance to the study process and acted as a sounding board regarding the development of the recommendations The stakeholders provided valuable insight into the economic and transportation concerns of their respective agencies and which project recommendations would or would not be acceptable to their management, elected officials and communities The stakeholder group was comprised of representatives from Allyn Community Association Bremerton Chamber of Commerce City of Bremerton City of Port Orchard City of Shelton Economic Development Council of Mason County Kitsap County Kitsap Economic Development Alliance Kitsap Transit Mason County Mason County Transit North Mason Chamber of Commerce Port of Allyn Port of Bremerton Port of Shelton Puget Sound Naval Ship Yard Shelton -Mason County Chamber of Commerce WSDOT — Olympic Region March 2012 -Final 2 Breme Ec onomic D e v e l opment Study What is the long -range vision for the corridor? The overall vision for the corridor is to provide a safe and efficient transportation system that supports the economic vitality of the region, allows the region to grow, unproved safety, meets community values and provide multi -modal travel opportunities for area residents, while minimizing impacts to the local environment and preserving the existing infrastructure Input for community values was provided by the stakeholders and includes the following measurements job creation or preservation, community support, and local comprehensive plan consistency To reflect the varying conditions within the study area, the BEDS long -range corridor vision for the study corridors varies by study segment and highway, as defined in Chapter 4 of this report Each segment vision represents the long -range goal for the corridor, which in some areas may be beyond the planning horizon, years 2020 and 2030, of this study Depending upon a segment's needs and /or if its performance is below WSDOT's predefined threshold, improvements could range from preservation and maintenance, to safety, to managing demand, or adding capacity strategically and where it is most cost effective to do so What are the goals for the corridor? The Bremerton Economic Development Study considered all six policy goals established by the state legislature for WSDOT, namely economic vitality, preservation, safety, mobility, environment, and stewardship The study process focused on safety and mobility issues, while preserving the existing transportation infrastructure, minimizing impacts to the environmental character of the study corridors, and investigating low cost improvements For safety, fatal and serious injury collision reduction is a focus along the US 101, SR 3 and SR 16 study corridors and is in accordance with "Target Zero," the state's effort to attain zero fatal and serious injury traffic crashes by year 2030 For mobility, the three state highways within the study area are all part of the National Highway System, and have been designated as Highways of Statewide Significance by the state legislature For this corridor system, the BEDS Study has established a goal of maintaining an operating speed of at least 70 percent of posted speeds March 2012 - Final 3 Bremerton Economic Development Study What are the recommended improvements? The BEDS Plan identifies 37 projects ranging between $2 million and $258 million dollars The proposed improvement projects were evaluated by the project team and stakeholders based on five categories involving 16 criteria The stakeholders group considered community and agency input, as well as the technical evaluation results to prioritize the proposed project improvement list The recommended top three projects for the communities along the study corridors are • Belfair Bypass - Construct an alternate 4 -lane highway, with limited access, around the community of Belfair The Bremerton Economic Development Study did not reanalyze the Belfair Bypass but did adopt the findings from previous studies regarding this project Further information on improvements in the Belfair area can be found at www wsdot wa gov /projects /sr3/ belfairnmprovements/ • SR 3 /Johns Prairie Road - Relocate the intersection north of its current terminus with SR 3 This would require re- aligning Johns Prairie Road Additionally, provide intersection controls, such as a roundabout, signal and /or channelization, as warranted It should be noted that the 2009 Legislature required that the WSDOT conduct a public outreach process to identify and respond to community concerns regarding the portion of John's Creek Road that connects SR 3 and US 101 WSDOT was also directed to issue a report on this public outreach effort The Bremerton Econorruc Development Study has adopted the report's recommendations for this location The report can be found at www wsdot wa gov/ News / 2010 /07 /16_101 -Johnsprairiereport htm • Gorst Area Improvements - Heavy peak period travel through the Gorst area from SR 304, SR 3 and SR 16 has created a traffic congestion issue that cannot be easily improved with a single project Improvements to SR 3 through the SR 304 interchange, widen SR 3 through the Gorst area to four -lanes with HOV lanes north of its Junction with SR 16, grade separate the Sam Christopherson Road /SR 3 intersection with a new interchange, and, widen connecting ramps to maintain traffic flows are all needed as well as a new interchange at SR 304 and HOV lanes extended north along SR 3 and south along SR 16 Information on projects in the Gorst area can be found at www wsdot wa gov /Projects /SR3 /UnstableSlopes/ March 2012 -Final 4 Bremerton Economic Development Study Recognizing that the above projects would be costly and take time to implement, the BEDS stakeholders also endorsed projects that are less expensive and potentially quicker and easier to construct The list of projects can be found in Chapter 5, Exhibit 5 -2 Depending upon economic conditions within the next five to ten years, it may be necessary to reevaluate and update the project list if future traffic conditions along the corridor evolve differently than anticipated in the study Lastly, an analysis was conducted to identify low -cost, high- return safety and mobility locations along the study corridors This analysis indicated that there are four intersections that meet this criteria These four locations are • SR 3 /Pickering Road (MP 10 76) — This location is identified as a safety need location • SR 3 /SR 302 Victor Cutoff Road (MP 23 23) — This location is identified as a safety need location • SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road /SR 16 Spur (MP 34 26) — This location is identified as a mobility need location • SR 3/Werner Road /Loxie Eagans Blvd (MP 37 31) — This location is identified as a safety need location WSDOT proposes that these four locations be improved based on their position on WSDOT's priority list Further and more detailed discussion of this safety and mobility analysis can be found on pages 40 through page 45 March 2012 - Final 5 This page intentionally left blank Bremerton Economic Development Study Chapter 1 - Project Overview What is the purpose of the Bremerton Economic This chapter describes Development Study (BEDS)? the Bremerton Economic The Bremerton Economic Development Study (BEDS) is a planning Development Study's study focused within the South Kitsap /North Mason County purpose, the process area Through this study, the Washington State Department of used, how the public Transportation (WSDOT) in conjunction with local stakeholders was Involved, and determined the 20 -year vision for the state highways encompassed by summarizes the key this study effort The following issues were assessed and identified findings and recommended • Current and future transportation needs within the study area Improvements along the • Recommendations to current safety needs and both existing and study corridors future mobility needs • Improvement strategies that support the economic objectives within the study area Funding for the study was provided by the Washington State Legislature during the 2007 Legislative Session along with local contributions from the Port of Bremerton, the city of Bremerton, Kitsap County, the Port of Shelton, the city of Port Orchard, and the Port of Allyn What are the origins of BEDS? The genesis for the Bremerton Econommc Development Study began nearly six years ago On July 8, 2004 the Port of Bremerton hosted a Transportation Summit in Bremerton The focus of the discussion was on transportation improvements needed for the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) proposal See page 29 of this report and Appendix 2 for a brief summary of SKIA This summit was attended by approximately 60 people and included state legislators, various local port comrmssioners, Kitsap County Commissioners, city council members, Kitsap Transit, public works directors, The Puget Sound Regional Council, staff' from economic development agencies, the Washington State Patrol, staff from the Naval Station Kitsap, Senator Maria Cantwell's office, land owners, WSDOT Olympic Region and Urban Planning Office staff, and the press March 2012 - Final 7 Breme Eco De Study Discussions focused on ferry service, safety and economic development, capacity improvements needed for relieving congestion in the Gorst area, potential Sinclair Inlet crossings, and how Kitsap and Mason Counties should prioritize their projects and present a united front to the legislature to obtain funding for such projects Eventually, it became evident that two things were needed to advance projects for funding by the legislature The first step was to have a well thought out, coordinated projects list This list would show a priority ranking of projects that would be constructed The second step was to ensure that projects were supported by data A project had to show it addressed a specific need or purpose, such as a safety or mobility issue and that it was also accompanied by a cost benefit analysis and a planning level cost estimate to construct the project With this in mind local elected officials and legislators from Kitsap and Mason Counties set about to secure funding for a study that would achieve the two steps listed above Ports, cities, and the two counties agreed to contribute funding to a study that would analyze roadway improvements needed to help support economic development in and around SKIA Along with local funding the state legislature allocated funding towards the study in the 2007 -2009 budget WSDOT was asked to lead the BEDS study Interlocal agreements were established between the funding agencies and WSDOT to commence the study What is the study area assessed in BEDS? The study area encompasses parts of two counties, one US highway, two state routes, and six communities The counties and communities within the study area include • Mason and Kitsap Counties • Cities of Shelton, Bremerton, and Port Orchard • Unincorporated Communities of Allyn, Belfair, and Gorst March 2012 -Final 8 Br Economic Development Study The study corridors are approximately 47 1 total miles in length The limits for the study corridors are • US 101, beginning at the intersection of State Route (SR) 102 north of Shelton and continuing southward to its intersection with SR 3, • SR 3, beginning at the intersection of US 101 and continuing northeastward through Shelton, Allyn, Belfair, and Gorst, ending at the intersection with Loxie Eagans Boulevard in Bremerton or approximately milepost (MP) 37 30, and • SR 16, beginning at the intersection of SR 3 in Gorst (SR 16 MP 29 16) and continuing southeastward to the intersection with SR 160 in Port Orchard (Sedgwtck Road SR 16 MP 25 43) Exhibit 1 -1 Study Area ' Edm a , Bellevue STUDY AREA Bremerton � Seattle f _ Port OrchaW Gors BatMlr ' Allyn f T acoma Shelton. O"Pla ` YCUr_, -.rc GN..xs'e 'w ,`; •�+nrj, i March 2012 - Final 9 Bremerton Economic Development Study What information is contained in the plan? This BEDS report presents the long -range corridor vision, provides analysis and evaluation of the existing and future transportation conditions, identifies current and future needs, and provides recommended actions to improve safety and mobility along the principal study corridors The information in this report is presented in six chapters, as follows • Chapter I presents the project overview, including an outline of the study's purpose and origin, the study area and principal corridors, the involvement of local agencies, tribes, and the public, and it summarizes the key findings and recommended improvements • Chapter 2 describes the existing conditions along the study corridors • Chapter 3 describes the future 2020 and 2030 traffic conditions along the study corridors • Chapter 4 presents the long -range vision for the study corridors, as developed by the stakeholders • Chapter 5 describes the recommended improvements along the study corridors and how they were prioritized • Chapter 6 discusses the next steps in the planning process There are also several appendices and referenced documents included Documents incorporated by reference include • Bel�air Bypass Study • SR 3 Belraer Area Widening and Safety Improvements Prolect March 2012 -Final 10 Breme E co n o mi c D e v e l opment Study What is the study process? The study was a collaborative process between WSDOT BEDS Study Process & Schedule and local agencies and organizations within the study area The study was organized and developed by taking the following steps March 2008 — September 2008 Identify Stakeholders • Establishing a Stakeholders Group of local agencies and Hold Key Stakeholders Interviews organizations along the study corridors to help direct the Establish Study Goals and Process study and prioritize recommended safety and mobility Review Previous Reports Collect & Analyze Traffic & Safety Data improvements Identify Existing Transportation Needs • Engaging citizens, special interest groups (including Attend Fairs and Festivals Conduct First Stakeholders Meeting recreational travelers, freight users, and labor groups), and public agencies through maintaining an open community involvement process September 2008 — March 2009 • Summarizing and analyzing existing traffic conditions, Develop Traffic Forecasts Analyze 2030 Traffic Operations identifying existing safety and mobility needs, and Develop Long -Range Vision developing improvement recommendations for existing Analyze 2020 Traffic Operations safety and mobility conditions Identify Transportation Needs Develop Evaluation Process • Reviewing local agency comprehensive plans to assess Identify Improvement Options projected population and employment growth in the study Analyze Improvement Options area This growth contributes to future traffic volumes and Conduct Second Stakeholders Meeting Continue Public Outreach influences recommended improvement strategies for the study corridors • Analyzing and summarizing future traffic conditions to April 2009 — June 2009 determine where mobility needs will exist in the future if no Refine Project List Stakeholders and Team Evaluate Projects improvements are made Conduct Third Stakeholders Meeting • Identifying mobility improvements that support projected Prioritize Projects & Recommendations population and fob growth Continue Public Outreach • Evaluating and prioritizing transportation improvements that can be implemented within the area as funding becomes December 2010 — January 2011 available Write Draft BEDS Report Finalize Report • Developing broad -based support of final recommendations Obtain Final Approvals from local jurisdictions, including Kitsap and Mason Counties, the cities of Bremerton, Shelton, and Port Orchard, the ports of Bremerton, Shelton, and Allyn, and the communities of Allyn, Belfair, and Gorst March 2012 - Final 11 Bremerton Economic Development Study How have local agencies been involved In the study? Throughout the study process, local agencies were involved This began with stakeholder interviews held to identify transportation concerns along the corridor, continued through development, evaluation, and prioritization of proposed projects, and ended with approval of the study report Stakeholder group - The stakeholder group consisted of 16 local agencies and organizations Members of the group acted as liaisons to their agencies and communities throughout the study Meeting three times during the course of the project, the group reviewed traffic and safety information, improvement projects, and discussed community and economic development issues During the final stakeholders meeting, the group endorsed the project list and corridor plan Agency and organization briefings - Throughout the duration of the project, WSDOT provided periodic briefings to local agencies and organizations represented by the stakeholder group These briefings allowed elected officials and others to hear first -hand how the project was progressing and what recommendations were being developed How has the public been involved in the process? Involving local communities in the study is important to WSDOT By using various methods of public involvement and outreach, the project team successfully gathered the input of the public throughout the study to create a plan that reflects the communities' character and concerns Fairs and festivals - WSDOT staffed booths at local events between July and September 2008 Staff' shared information about the study ,. in the form of fact sheets and display boards and asked the public for their thoughts, ideas, and concerns about the three corridors (SR 3, SR 16, and US 101) Staff noted conversation highlights, tallied common themes, and reported them back to the project team and ti p ' stakeholders group More than 900 community members visited a r r project booth at local fairs and festivals (See Appendix One, Public Outreach Summary for more information) March 2012 -Final 12 Bremerton Economic Development Study Website and comment form - Throughout the project, WSDOT maintained a project website to keep the public informed of project progress General project information and stakeholders meeting summaries were posted on the site In addition, the locations of community booths and briefings were posted there for those who were interested in attending The project websrte also included an online comment form allowing anyone to submit comments or questions to the project team Feedback from fairs and festivals, the online comment form, the stakeholders group, and briefings helped us identity concerns and issues along the project corridors Common concerns included congestion, safety, and the need for more bicycle and pedestrian facilities Common suggestions from the communities included • Building the Belfair Bypass • Improving throughput in the Gorst area • Fixing the Johns Prairie Road /SR 3 intersection • Widening the roadways in general • Installing turn lanes, passing lanes, and signals in select locations Project kiosks & information materials - After the project recommendations were endorsed by the stakeholders, WSDOT developed project kiosks, a folio, and fact sheets to share results and recommendations with community members along the corridors These materials were placed in the following six locations in the area • Norm Dicks Government Center in Bremerton • Fred Meyer at 5050 State Highway 303 NE in Bremerton • Kitsap County Administration Building in Port Orchard • Theler Center in Belfair • Port of Allyn at 18560 SR 3 in Allyn • Shelton Civic Center at 525 West Cota Street in Shelton Media - WSDOT maintained contact with local media at mayor milestones throughout the study, generating several news articles and one radio spot WSDOT also placed ads in local papers to notify the public of locations of project kiosks and information materials March 2012 - Final 13 B E conomic D evelop m ent Study What transportation issues does the plan address? The BEDS considered all five policy goals established by the state legislature for WSDOT, namely preservation, safety, mobility, environment, and stewardship The study process focused on safety and mobility issues, while preserving the existing transportation infrastructure, considering the environmental character of the study corridors, and investigating low cost improvements Safety - Collision reduction is a focus area along the US 101, SR 3, and SR 16 study corridors WSDOT has developed a new system that identifies sections of a highway that are considered "Sites with Potential for Improvement" or SWPI, which includes identifying "Collision Analysis Corridors" (CAC) and "Collision Analysis Locations" (CAL) These corridors and locations typically have multiple collisions that involve fatalities There are four sites along SR 3 that have been identified as SWPI sites plus one CAL and CAC These sites are located south of Shelton, north of Allyn, through Belfair, and south of the Bremerton National Airport See page 32 for further discussion on the safety analysis for this study and pages 35 -36 for a description of the CAC and CAL locations Mobility - The three state highways (US 101, SR 3, and SR 16) within the study area are all part of the National Highway System (NHS), having been designated as Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS) by the state legislature and are functionally classified as Urban or Rural Principal Arterials depending on location To analyze the state highway system, WSDOT has revised their analysis tools and methods to be consistent with current times and be good stewards of the highway system in their current 2007 -2026 Highway System Plan Previously, WSDOT targeted highway improvements to maintain free -flow conditions (or traveling at the posted speed 24 hours per day) This approach resulted in expensive projects that limited the ability of the state to address congestion on a statewide basis Furthermore, highway officials realized that there simply is not enough state and local money or land to build sufficient capacity to reach free -flow conditions As a result, WSDOT has set a new goal in their plan to manage the state system to achieve maximum vehicle throughput Typically, maximum March 2012 - Final 14 Bremerton Economic Development Study throughput of vehicles on a highway with a posted speed of 60 mph is achieved at speeds of 42 to 51 mph or about 70 to 85 percent of the posted speeds, during the p in peak period When speeds fall below 70 percent, the highway no longer operates efficiently Hence, WSDOT has targeted this condition (operating speed below 70 percent of posted speeds) as the threshold for determining when capital improvements to improve operating conditions should be considered Traffic analysis for the existing 2008 traffic conditions indicates that the operating speed along the corridors is below 70 percent of the posted speed for about 12 5 miles or nearly 27 percent of the corridor Future year analyses indicate that the operating speed along the corridors will fall below 70 percent of the posted speed for about 25 8 miles in 2020 and for about 35 5 mules by 2030 with no improvements For intersection analysis, the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) provides the guidelines to analyze intersection level -of- service (LOS) Based on these procedures, the level -of- service at 23 of the 29 intersections analyzed will be below LOS D by 2020 The number of failing intersections operating below adopted standards increases to 26 by 2030 if no improvements are made March 2012 - Final 15 Bremerton Economic Development Study What are the top recommended improvements? Proposed safety and mobility projects were evaluated based on five categories, involving 16 criteria The evaluation categories included • Safety • Constructability • Congestion /Mobility • Environmental Impact • Community Issues The stakeholders prioritized the project list based on the evaluation results, community and agency input, and desires The recommended top three priority projects are • Belfair Bypass - Construct an alternate highway around the community of Belfair The highway was to be 4 -lanes with full lumted access control The 2009 legislature, in a proviso, directed the WSDOT to conduct a public outreach process to be used in reconsidering the scope and budget of the Belfair Bypass project With the aid of elected officials, stakeholders and members of the community, WSDOT has identified four alternatives for consideration On June 23, 2010 a report was delivered to the legislature documenting the findings and recommendations instructed by the proviso The proviso, report and status of the Belfair Bypass project can be found at www wsdot wa gov/Pro}ects /SR3 /BelfairBypass/ • SR 3 /Johns Prairie Road - Relocate the intersection north of its current terminus with SR 3 This would require realigning Johns Prairie Road Additionally, provide intersection controls, such as a roundabout, signal and /or channelization, as warranted It should be noted that the 2009 State Legislature required that the WSDOT "conduct a public outreach process to identify and respond to community concerns regarding the portion of John's Creek Road that connects state route number 3 and state route number 101 The process must include representatives from Mason county, the legislature, area businesses, and community members The department shall use this process to consider, develop, and design a project scope so that the community's needs The original recommendation adopted by the BEDS stakeholders was to relocate the intersection south of its current terminus The recommendation has been modified to be consistent with the findings from the Johns Prairie Road proviso 2 This should have read "Johns Prairie Road in the above legislature text March 2012 -Final 16 Bremerton Economic Development S are met for the lowest cost The department shall provide a report on the process and outcomes to the legislature by June 30, 2010 " The report required by legislative proviso in the 2009 transportation budget was submitted to the legislature by the June 30, 2010 deadline The report can be found at www wsdot wa gov/ News / 2010 /07 /16_101 -Johnsprairiereport htm The proviso report to the legislature can be found at www wsdot wa gov / News / 2010 /07/16_101_j ohnsprairiereport htm • Gorst Area Improvements - Widen SR 3 through the Gorst area to four -lanes with HOV lanes north of its function with SR 16, grade separate the Sam Christopherson Road /SR 3 intersection with a new interchange, and widen connecting ramps to maintain traffic flows SR 16 will be re- striped to provide two general purpose lanes and one HOV lane in each direction from SR 166 to SR 3 What are the next steps? Recognizing that the above projects would be costly and take time to implement, the BEDS stakeholders also endorsed a list of projects that are less costly and would be easier and quicker to construct The list of prioritized projects can be found in Chapter 5, Exhibit 5 -2 Depending upon economic conditions within the next five to ten years, it may be necessary to reevaluate and update the project list if future traffic conditions along the corridor evolve differently than anticipated in the study Only one of the thirty -three recommended projects has existing funding With the high demand for transportation dollars and limited funds, it was important that the stakeholders agreed on the prioritization of area projects so that funds can be sought in a cooperative manner Specific actions that can be taken be taken by the local agencies and communities to encourage implementation of the BEDS prioritized projects, including • Incorporate the BEDS' recommendations in the state Highway System Plan and in regional agency plans, and • Encourage local agencies within the study area to adopt the BEDS' recommendations as part of their comprehensive plans March 2012 - Final 17 This page intentionally l blank Bremert Economic Development Study Chapter 2 - Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis How were the study corridors analyzed? This chapter describes The study corridors are divided into four segments to account for the existing conditions varying regional geographies and transportation characteristics These along the three main corridor segments are illustrated in Exhibit 2 -1 highways through the A brief description of each corridor segment is defined from study area This includes west to east how the corridor is classified, its physical • Segment I is defined as the segment of the corridor that provides tics, the teris access to the city of Shelton It contains highway segments that characteristics, eras facilities along range from linuted access highways (part of US 101) to city streets the corridor, summaries of as SR 3 passes through Shelton This segment begins on US 101 at environmental, land use, Dayton Airport Road (SR 102) and continues south along and population changes US 101 until it intersects SR 3 The segment then turns north, running along SR 3 through Shelton before ending at East Mason in the study area, and a Lake Road Terrain along the US 101 portion is characterized as summary of the safety rolling with marginal slopes As SR 3 enters the city of Shelton, analysis conducted for this the terrain along the corridor becomes level and remains so until it study exits the city, where it becomes rolling again • Segment 2 is defined as the segment that encompasses the unincorporated, rural area between Shelton and Allyn This segment begins at East Mason Lake Road along SR 3 and runs northeast until the northern intersection of East Grapeview Loop Road and SR 3 The terrain is marginally rolling throughout this segment The segment is marked by controlled and non - controlled intersections and driveways March 2012 - Final 19 Bremerton Economic Development Study Segment 3 is defined as the segment that transverses the rural communities of Allyn and Belfair with lower posted speed limits This segment begins on SR 3 at the intersection of East Grapeview Loop Road, and runs northeast through the areas of Allyn and Belfair until SR 3 intersects with SW Lake Flora Road in Kitsap County The terrain in this segment is rolling This segment is marked by controlled and non - controlled intersections and driveways Additionally, this segment is where SR 302 terminates with SR 3, dust north of Allyn and where SR 106 and SR 300 terminate with SR 3 in the Belfair area Segment 4 includes SR 3 and SR 16 that lead into the unincorporated area of Gorst and the cities of Bremerton and Port Orchard This segment continues northeast along SR 3 until it forks directly before the Sinclair Inlet The top leg turns north and runs northeast along SR 3, ending at Loxie Eagans Boulevard in Bremerton The bottom leg becomes SR 16 and heads southeast until the end of the study area at the intersection of SR 16 and SR 160 /Sedgwick Road, south of the city of Port Orchard The terrain in Segment 4 is rolling until the SR 3 /SR 16 intersection, at which point it becomes level through the Gorst area As SR 3 heads north into Bremerton, it remains level along the shore of Sinclair Inlet to Loxie Eagans Boulevard Along SR 3 there are both controlled and non - controlled intersections and driveways between the Mason County and Kitsap County line North of SR 16 to Bremerton, SR 3 is a minted access highway There is some business access and driveways at the SR 3 /SR 16 terminus SR 16 is mostly a limited access freeway Additionally, this segment is where SR 304 terminates with SR 3 in Bremerton, and SR 166 terminates with SR 16 west of Port Orchard March 2012 -Final 20 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 2 -1 Corridor Segments 30 AL DHBrer� rton - -. ' +X ' Loxle Eagans Boulevard ' 30 Port Orchard f Mason County o rs rf . Lake Flora Road . Sedgwlck Road ' 300 I Kltsap County U6 $ Kmg Cant/ JIM 0 i 30 Allyn �, ;- ' e_ "' evlew Loop Read 3 ( - -Fierce County • • f 1 b r �, • • , ?" �'g ° y r / /fir t � sod ( �7�`4{ �{ �} y ° "�� � S 1 O • F, LEGEND ason Lake 4 Oad � i ( Bremerton Ecammc Dev*pmM Study �+ Study COtndOr ' on Segment Break Pant SR 3 March 2012 - Final 21 Bremert Economic Development Study How are the study corridors designated and classified? There are several roadway classification systems that apply to the three main highways (US 101, SR 3, and SR 16) in the study area These systems include national, statewide, and functional classifications, ds well as freight designations Federal Classification The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) established a National Highway System (NHS) that in 1995 was approved by the United States Congress To become part of the NHS, a roadway must be deemed important to the nation's economy, defense, and mobility The segments of US 101, SR 3, and SR 16 encompassed by the study area are all part of the NHS State Classification At the state level, Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS) were established by the 1998 State of Washington Legislature through House Bill 1487 and coded as RCW 47 06 140 HSS are considered to be important to the movement of people, goods, services, and the military on a statewide basis, and have beneficial effects on the welfare of the state economy US 101, SR 3, and SR 16 within the study area are part of the HSS Functional Classification WSDOT in partnership with the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) and the FHWA establish the functional classifications for state highways The functional classification is primarily a reflection of the type of travel associated with a highway facility For all three state highways (US 101, SR 3, and SR 16) the functional classification is either "Rural Principal Arterial - R 1" or "Urban Principal Arterial - U 1," dependent upon the location By definition, principal arterials serve corridor movements having travel characteristics indicative of substantial statewide and interstate travel March 2012 -Final 22 Bremerton Economic Development Study Freight Designations All three major roadways (US 101, SR 3, and SR 16) are part of the Strategic Freight Corridor System The three state The Washington State Freight and Goods Transportation highways are classified as follows within the study area System (FGTS) was created to • US 101 from SR 3 to Wallace Road is classified as T -2, and from classify state highways county Wallace Road to SR 102, it is classified as T -3 roads and city streets according to their annual freight tonnage • SR 3 from US 101 to Sunnyslope Road is classified as T -3, from There are five freight categories Sunnyslope Road to Gorst, it is classified as T -2, and from Gorst to ranging from T -1 to T -5 SR 308, it is classified as T -1 • SR 16 Its entire length within the study area is classified as T -1 with the Gorst Spur classified as T -2 See Appendix 2 for a definition of the freight classifications Access Control In the state of Washington, state highways are divided into two access control classes, limited access and managed access, and further divided into three and five sub - classes, respectively All classes are based on the amount of restrictions, with WSDOT controlling approaches to hmited access routes, and cities controlling approaches within their boundaries on managed access routes Approaches in unincorporated areas to managed access routes require state authorization The study corridors traverse various regions and jurisdictions, thus access control classifications vary accordingly The access classifications along the study corridors are illustrated in Exhibit 2 -3 Exhibit 2 -2 Access Control Types Main Classes Limited Access Managed Access Description Highway access property rights purchased Abutting property owner has right to access from owners of property abutting highway highway, but this right is subordinate to a safe WSDOT controls approaches to highway and efficient highway system Cities control approaches within their boundaries, others controlled by WSDOT Sub - classes Full Control, Partial Control, Modified Control Class 1, Class 2 Class 3, Class 4, Class 5 Charactenstics Full Control most restrictive Modified Control Class i most restrictive, Class 5 least least restrictive At -grade intersections restrictive Accesses spaced at least 1250' and commercial approaches prohibited or apart for Class 1 and at least 125' apart for selectively permitted Class 5 Other classes have distances that lie between these two values Source WSDOT Design Office March 2012 - Final 23 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 2 -3 Access Controls _ f � T3 ` -� U li _ mPort 4rchaod Mason County GOrt 16 Belfair � �F 300 �� 16 �� ' Kitsap County *ing County 106 Ally ��� 30 �.� � � y � Pierce County 3 01 LEGEND � r 10 ' s �, a Bremerton Ecownic Development Study Lunted Access s YIeItO� ' �� zi Managed Access March 2012 -Final 24 Brem Ec onomic D evelopment Study What are the physical characteristics of the study corridors? US 101 is a national highway traversing Washington, Oregon, and California A 7 6 mile segment of this roadway on the west side of Shelton is within the study area This section of US 101 is an undivided, two -lane highway between its intersection with SR 102 at MP 343 44 and MP 349 30 near the SR 3 interchange, except for a one -mile segment between the Wallace Boulevard off-ramp and the Shelton - Matlock Road on -ramp where an additional northbound lane is added South of its function with the SR 3 ramps, US 101 becomes a divided highway and transitions from a two -lane facility to a four - lane facility near MP 35100 SR 3 is a state highway originating at its junction with US 101, south of the city of Shelton From there, it runs northeast through Mason County and Kitsap County Upon reaching Bremerton, it continues north through Kitsap County before terminating at SR 104 on the eastern end of the Hood Canal Floating Bridge The total length of SR 3 is 59 8 miles, 37 8 miles of which are included in the study area SR 3 is generally a two -lane undivided highway from its beginning at US 101 (SR 3 MP 0 00) to SR 16 (SR 3 MP 34 31), except for a short segment (0 06 miles) in the city of Shelton, where it becomes a four - lane, undivided roadway Between SR 16 and Sherman Heights Road, SR 3 becomes a divided highway that transitions to a six -lane facility North of Sherman Heights Road to Loxie Eagans Boulevard, SR 3 is generally a four -lane divided highway, except in the vicinity of SR 304 where the southbound direction is reduced to a single lane SR 16 is a state highway that begins in the city of Tacoma at its connection to I -5 From there it continues north through Pierce County and into Kitsap County It continues northwest past the city of Port Orchard before ending at SR 3 in Gorst, an unincorporated community at the head of Sinclair Inlet SR 16 is a total of 27 miles long, of which the last 4 3 miles are in the study area SR 16 is a four - lane, limited access, divided highway from Sedgwick Road (SR 160) near MP 24 68 to the SR 166 interchange where it becomes a six -lane highway, to its junction with SR 3 (SR 16 MP 29 06) Exhibit 2 -4 summarizes the general physical configuration of the three mayor highways along the study corridors March 2012 - Final 25 Bremerton Economic Developm Study Exhibit 2 -4 Summary of Physical Characteristics Roadway Physical Characteristics Segment Hwy Milepost Location EB WB Div /Undiv lanes lanes 1 US 101 343 44 - 345 47 Intersection w /SR 102 to Wallace Blvd Off -ramp 1 1 Undivided 1 US 101 345 47 - 346 47 Wallace Blvd Off -Ramp to Shelton - Matlock Rd On- 1 2 Undivided ramp 1 US 101 346 47 - 349 30 Shelton - Matlock Rd On -ramp to directly after SR 3 1 1 Undivided bridge 1 US 101 349 30 - 35017 Directly after SR 3 bridge to directly before the Off- 1 1 Divided ramp to SR 3 1 US 101 35017 - 350 23 Off -ramp to SR 3 vicinity 2 1 Divided 1 US 101 350 23 - 351 00 No significant landmarks 2 2 Divided 1 SR 3 000-271 Intersection w /SR 101 to intersection w /Railroad 1 1 Undivided Avenue in Shelton 1 SR 3 271 -277 Railroad Avenue to Front Street 2 2 Undivided 1 SR 3 277-724 Front Street to Mason Lake Road 1 1 Undivided 2 SR 3 724-2032 E Mason Lake Road to E Grapeview Loop Road 1 1 Undivided 3 SR 3 2032-2693 E Grapeview Loop Road to North of Cokelet Lane 1 1 Undivided 3 SR 3 2693-2766 North of Cokelet Lane to North of NE Peninsula Place 2 1 Undivided 3 SR 3 2766-2878 North of NE Peninsula Place to Lake Flora Road 1 1 Undivided 4 SR 3 2878-3230 Lake Flora Road to South of Sunnyslope Road 1 1 Undivided 4 SR 3 3230-3407 South of Sunnyslope Road to South of W Pleasant 1 2 Undivided Street 4 SR 3 3407-3451 South of W Pleasant Street to SR 16 EB Off -ramp 1 1 Undivided 4 SR3 3431 - 34 51 SR 16 EB Off -ramp to SR 16 EB intersection 1 1 Divided 4 SR 3 3451 -3467 SR 16 EB intersection to end of SR 16 bridge 1 3 Divided 4 SR 3 3467-3481 End of SR 16 bridge to Sherman Heights Road vicinity 3 3 Divided 4 SR 3 3481 - 36 37 Sherman Heights Road vicinity to vicinity of Off -ramp 2 2 Divided to SR 304 4 SR 3 3637-3675 Off-ramp to SR 304 to vicinity of On -ramp from SR 2 1 Divided 4 SR 3 3637-3675 On -ramp from SR 304 to On -ramp from Loxie Eagans 2 2 Divided Boulevard 4 SR 16 2468-2816 On -ramp from SR 160 (Sedgwick Rd) to SR 166 2 2 Divided intersection 4 SR 16 124 16 29 06 1 SR 166 to intersection w /SR 3 3 3 Divded Source WSDOT State Highway Log EB is increasing mile post WB is decreasing March 2012 -Final 26 Bremerton Economic Development Study Highway Speed Lumts Speed limits range from 25 mph to 60 mph in the study area As would be expected, speed limits are generally higher along multi -lane divided highways, as well as areas more rural in character Lower speed linuts occur in more urban areas, such as Shelton, Allyn, and Belfair Exhibit 2 -5 depicts speed limits throughout the corridor Exhibit 2 -5 Speed Limits &0 Lome Eagans Blvd 1 Brem rton s t SR 304` " Frontage Road r 30 Orchard Mason County I �7OMt 6 I g Belfair � ��� Belfair UGA Limit O 300 m�f� udy Lane � Kttsap County 16 North Bay Road P C Ktng Cou r _ Allyn ar pevtew Loop Road..° / \) "- Pierce County, w =� 3 x ' -a 01Y Wallace Kneeland Blv LEGEND j Agate Road r ; aj Bmme tun Eomamk DaydWnimt SWO a 1` t w (3 � Posted Speed 60 mph Ity Limit f Speed op Rallroad Avenues ,a Posted 50 to 55 h Shelton ' 9 ' r° �° Posted Speed 40 to 50 mph Delaware Stregt �' Posted Speed 30 to 35 mph t 8 Arcade Avenue � j$ 1 ° posted Speed < 30 mph Source WSDOT State Highway Log March 2012 - Final 27 Bremerton Economic Development Study Intersections The study corridors have a total of 88 intersections, not including interchanges Of these intersections, 29 were selected for analysis based on collision history and level of congestion Exhibit 2 -6 identifies the location of the intersections selected for analysis and the type of traffic control features that currently exist Exhibit 2 -6 Intersection Locations for Analysis & Type of Traff ic Control 3 x / Lofds Eagans Blvd If it 13-" emerton (two Intersections) 1 Sam Christopherson Road 3 0 Sunnyslopo Rea Port Orchard L Clifton Road IIC two Intersections) t Mason County orst perlai Way gwiek R C Belfai r Lake Fiore Road (tw Int ersealdns ) 1 1 a Drive , /9 Kitsap County 16 i SR soz i LPkeland Drive North Bay Road '— King County �' 10 Allyn so 1 � - r Sherwood Creek Road Pierce County McEwan Prairie Rdf Asson'Lake R _ I Anthony Road t ' pevlew Loop Road Pickering Road GrapevievytLcop Road Agate Road a#on B on Road \ tl NlcEwan Pralde RdfBrockdaiA Rd stand � 1 stand row oad ! ° '10 Deer Cree� Road LEGEND Cranberry Creek Road Brematon Econonw Devebpmmt Stady Wallace Kneel Blvd aeon Lake Road sa>• Study Candor (lwo Intersections) y oboe Prairie Roan � � Shelton ` ` � � StopConhd lntersechon Shelton ock Road Slgit>11¢edlntersec6orl SR ] Source WSDOT State Highway Log March 2012 - Final 28 Bremerton Economic Development Study Segment 1 contains the highest number of intersections Although these intersections are spaced farther apart along the rural segments of US 101, they are densely spaced in the city of Shelton As SR 3 moves into Segment 2, development is less intensive, with intersections spaced almost one mile apart on average Segment 3, at 8 46 miles in length, is shorter than Segment 1, and yet contains nearly as many intersections Segment 3 intersections are more closely spaced on average than any other segment in the study corridors Intersections through the Belfair area were analyzed as part of various Belfair area studies and were not re- analyzed as part of this study In Segment 4, SR 3 starts near the border of Mason and Kitsap Counties with most of the intersections in this segment being evenly spaced, except those that lie in the Gorst area, where they are more concentrated A total of 29 intersections were selected for traffic analysis, including interchange on/off ramps Of the 29 intersections analyzed, two were located outside of the immediate study corridors These two intersections, Mason Lake Road with McEwan Prairie Road and McEwan Prairie Road with Brockdale Road, are both located north of the city of Shelton These two intersections were included to investigate potential benefits of an alternate route for SR 3 across the area north of Shelton This alternative route was examined to determine if it would divert commercial truck traffic from downtown Shelton and provide a more conducive access to SR 3 than the SR 3/ Johns Prairie Road intersection Exhibit 2 -7, Intersection Summary, provides details on the four corridor segments Exhibit 2 -7 Intersection Summary Total Average Number of Segment Intersections Intersection Intersections Spacing (miles) Analyzed 1 30 049 7 2 14 1 093 1 9 3 27 0 31 4 4 17 079 9 March 2012 - Final 29 Bremerton Economic Development Study Traffic Control Most of the intersections are stop - controlled with the stop signs located on cross streets or at ramp terminals There are no stop signs on US 101 or SR 16 mainline within the study area On SR 3 northbound, there are two stop signs in Shelton, but no stop sign on SR 3 in the southbound direction There are 13 signalized intersections along the study corridors, of this total, five are in the Shelton area in Segment 1, two in the Belfair area in Segment 3, and six in Segment 4, including the SR 3 /Imperial Way and SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road intersections and the ramp terminals of Loxie Eagans Boulevard and SR 160 (two at each interchange location) There are no signalized intersections along Segment 2 Of these signalized intersections, only the six signalized intersections in Segment 4 are included in the list of locations to be analyzed The type of traffic control at each location to be analyzed is also shown on Exhibit 2 -6 There is also a signalized crosswalk in the Belfair area Interchanges There are a total of nine interchanges in the study area, all are located in Segments 1 or 4 Interchanges in Segment 1 are on US 101 where the speed limit is 60 mph Segment 1 interchanges are located at SR 3, Shelton Matlock Road, and Wallace Kneeland Boulevard Those in Segment 4 begin at the Gorst Spur and intermittently lie along SR 3 and SR 16 until the end of the segment Segment 4 interchanges are located at SR 3 /SR 16, SR 3 /SR 304, SR 3 /Loxie Eagans Boulevard, SR 16 /SR 16 Spur /SR 166, SR 16 /SR 160 (Sedgwick Road), and Old Clifton Road /Tremont Street Left -Turn Pockets There are a total of 33 intersections with left -turn lane channelization along the study corridors, with 15 in Segment 1, three in Segment 2, eight in Segment 3, and seven in Segment 4 The highest frequency of left -turn pockets exists where development is more intensive March 2012 -Final 30 Bremerton Economic Development Study Crosswalks Along the study corridors, crosswalks are predominantly located in the urbanized areas of Shelton, Allyn, and Belfair In Segment 1, there are 23 crosswalk locations, all located in Shelton where traffic speeds are low and development is most intense Segment 2 contains no crosswalks In Segment 3, one crosswalk is located in the Allyn area, and four are located in the Belfair vicinity, of these four, two are mid -block pedestrian crossings (one signalized and one unsignalized) Segment 4 contains crosswalks at Imperial Way (three crosswalks) and at Sam Christopherson Road (three crosswalks), both at signalized intersections In addition, crosswalks are located at the SR 3 ramp ternunals with Loxie Eagans Boulevard and at the SR 16 ramp terminals with SR 160 Two -Way Left -Turn Lanes Two -way left -turn lanes (TWLTL) are added along corridors to make mid -block left -turns from blocking the through lanes Segment I contains six locations where TWLTL are present, including two along US 101 south of SR 102 and four along SR 3 in Shelton Four TWLTL segments are located in Segment 3 in the Belfair area The longest TWLTL is approximately 2,700 feet, providing access to the Bremerton National Airport and the South Krtsap Industrial Area, in Segment 4 Bridges and Structures Along the study corridors there are a total of 30 structures The oldest structure, built in 1923, is the Goldsborough Creek Bridge in Shelton The newest structure is Sweetwater Creek Culvert in Segment 3 constructed in 2001 Exhibit 2 -8 provides a summary of the bridges and structures, with their sufficiency rating, along the study corridors All bridges along the study corridors were rated using a load factor method Based on the calculated results, WSDOT can deternune whether or not a bridge or other structure is in need of repair or in need of replacement A sufficiency rating below 50 indicates that a structure needs repair or replacement Based on the ratings listed in Exhibit 2 -8, all structures along the study corridors have ratings above 50, although there are four structures that are close to the 50 threshold sufficiency rating March 2012 - Final 31 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 2 -8 Summary of Bridge and Structure Data Segment Corridor Mile Post Bridge Bridge Name Year Operating Sufficiency Number Built Tonnagea Rating° 1 US 101 34511 101/423 US 101 OC, Wallace Blvd 1993 75/F 9900 1 US 101 34618 101/424 US 101 OC C St 1973 59/F 8271 1 US 101 34651 101/425 Goldsborough Creek & RR OC 1973 54/F 9028 1 US 101 34679 101/426 Matlock Rd OC 1973 56/F 9352 1 US 101 34808 101/427 US 101 OC, Lost Lake Rd 1972 44/F 7708 1 US 101 34844 101/428 Mill Creek 1973 51/F 8326 1 SR 3 000 101/429 SR 3 OC 1972 69/F 9290 1 SR 3 092 3/2 Mill Creek 1921c 61 F/ 7013 1 SR 3 245 3/3 Goldsborough Creek 1923 43/F 5002 1 SR 3 659 3/8 Johns Creek 1948 54/F 8467 2 SR 3 856 3/10 Cranberry Creek 1957 39/F 51 98 2 SR 3 892 3/11 Deer Creek 1957 40 /F 5344 3 SR 3 2036 3/15 Sherwood Creek 1952 58 /F 5221 3 SR 3 2533 3/1925 Sweetwater Creek Culvert 2001 60 /N 8496 4 SR 3 3442 3/103N SR 16 OC 1988 59/F 8700 4 SR 3 3456 3/104 Gorst Creek Bridge 1988 87/F 8375 4 SR 3 3457 3/10425 Gorst Creek 1960 99/N 81 00 4 SR 3 3659 304/1 W -S W -S Ramp SR 3 OC 1991 99/F 9469 4 SR 3 3731 3/114 SR 3 OC, K St 1972 99/F 8000 4 SR 3 3782 3/116P Searle St Pedestrian UC 1974 0/N 000 4 SR 3 3829 3/118E SR 310 - Kitsap Way OC 1983 88/F 9016 4 SR 3 3829 3/118W SR 310 - Kitsap Way OC 1974 81 /F 9011 4 SR 16 2374 16/202 SR 16 OC, Bethel Rd 1977 51/F 9493 4 SR 16 2515 160/5 SR 16 OC 1977 65/F 9900 4 SR 16 2595 16/204W Sidney Rd OC SB 1977 91/F 9710 4 SR 16 2596 16/204E Sidney Rd OC NB 1977 91/F 9810 4 SR 16 2668 16/204 5E Tremont St O/C 1988 63/F 9810 4 SR 16 2669 16/204 5W Tremont St O/C 1988 65/F 9093 4 SR 16 2781 16/205 SR 166 OC 1956 57/F 6557 4 SR 16 287 16/208N -S N -S Ramp SR 16 OC 1988 56/F 8280 a - 99 is the operating rating tonnage F means the ratings are calculated by the load factor method N means that no calculations were conducted b - If the value in this column is < 50, the structure needs repair or replacement c - This bridge was rebuilt in 1966 OC = Overcrossing UC = Undercrossing Source WSDOT Bndge and Structures Office March 2012 -Final 32 B reme rt on Economic Development Study What multimodal facilities and other transportation services are available along the study corridors? Transit Mason County Transportation Authority (MCTA) and Kitsap Transit are the two agencies responsible for public transit in the study area There are a total of six bus routes provided by MCTA that traverse the study corridors There are a total of ten park & ride facilities along or near the study corridors The location of these facilities along with the regular bus routes in the study corridors are depicted in Exhibit 2 -9 Kitsap Transit provides Worker /Driver Program routes within the study area The Worker /Driver Program was started during World War II when fuel rationing and the use of buses proved to be most efficient in a time of tight resource supplies Kitsap Transit inherited 12 routes when it took over the transportation needs of Kitsap County residents Today, the current program operates 26 routes to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) and Naval Station Bremerton These buses are driven by full -tune employees ( "workers ") of the military facilities and are also part - tune employees of Kitsap Transit ( "drivers ") This system transports thousands of employees to and from work Its buses traverse sections of SR 16 and SR 3 that lie within the study area March 2012 - Final 33 Bremert Economic Dev Study Exhibit 2 -9 Transit Routes and Park & Ride Locations .._ W 0 k 3 f Brem rtow 30 ./ ' - 'Port Orcharl Mason County Gorst 16 P &R PQ tz� P 2(40) 30 ( I Kitsap County s S ( Kmg County Allyn, t 1� Prerce County 3 N 01 PsR r — LEGEND 10 Pm Bremerton Economic Development Rudy Transit Route f t ` Route Number heIton r , P&a Park & Ride (no of stalls) P &R P s, 1 S 2 (1� Ib"° locations n rtwlbcls Ioc.> 2(40) z ` March 2012 -Final 34 Bremerton Economic Development Study Ferry Service Portions of SR 3 and SR 16 are located next to Sinclair Inlet and Port Orchard Bay, which provide waterway access to Puget Sound Within the study area, ferry service from Seattle to Bremerton, from West Seattle (Fauntleroy) to Vashon Island, and on to Southworth in Kitsap County are operated by Washington State Ferries (WSF) In addition, Kitsap Transit operates a passenger- only ferry that operates between downtown Port Orchard and downtown Bremerton and downtown Bremerton to Annapolis (to the east of downtown Port Orchard) People who are traveling between the two cities may choose to use this transportation option to avoid driving through the Gorst area Both Washington State Ferries and Kitsap Transit Foot Ferry operate daily Passenger Rail Neither Mason nor Kitsap Counties have operational passenger rail facilities Freight Rail Service There is a freight railway that follows the same general alignment as SR 3 from Shelton to Gorst When it reaches Gorst, it branches into two segments one branch travels north through Bremerton to its endpoint at the Bangor Naval Reservation, and the other branch follows the SR 3 and SR 304 alignments until it terminates at the PSNS This railway is used to transport materials and equipment to and from the military stations and installations located in the Kitsap Peninsula Non - Motorized Facilities As documented in the 2005 Comprehensrne Plan, Mason County has two designated pedestrian/bicycle trails • On Brockdale Road from Wallace Boulevard to Island Lake Drive • On Arcadia Road from SR 3 to Binns- Swiger Road On the Mason County Recreation Map dated December 2008, the Mason Lake Loop, 24 -miles long, and the Grapeview Loop Road, 7 8 -miles long are listed as two of Mason County's favorite bicycle rides Both of these loops have access to SR 3 Bicycle and pedestrian travel, even on these routes, is mainly on the roadway or roadway shoulder, although there may be informal paths off the roadway within neighborhoods Shoulders along US 101 are generally wide enough to accommodate bicycle travel, however, in many areas along SR 3, the shoulders do not have sufficient width for bicycles to operate outside the travel lanes March 2012 - Final 35 Bremerton Economic Development Study Currently, there is considerable bicycle traffic to and from the Puget Sound Naval Slupyard During the week of April 19 - 25, 2009, there were 288 persons reported entering the shipyard by bicycle and 274 persons leaving from the east gates For the west gate entrances, the Naval Shipyard personnel estimate that approximately 35 to 50 persons arrive or leave by bicycle a day, many of which use SR 3, SR 304, or SR 16 for a portion of their commute The lower number of bicyclists using the west gates may be attributed to the smaller shoulder widths on the heavier traveled highway These counts show that there is a demand for better bicycle facilities in the area Kitsap County has developed a more extensive non - motorized transportation plan with mayor north -south and east -west routes, as described in the county's Non - Motorized Transportation System Elements Along the study corridors, part of the planned Mosquito Fleet Trail extends along SR 166, SR 16, and SR 3 around Sinclair Inlet What are the land uses in the study area? US 101 is surrounded by the city of Shelton and other urban growth areas through Mason County Along SR 3, most of the corridor traverses rural areas except for the urban growth areas of Shelton, Allyn, and Belfair There is also a section of long -term commercial forest area along SR 3 south of Allyn Much of SR 3 and SR 16 pass through the incorporated cities of Bremerton and Port Orchard, which include both residential and commercial developments in Kitsap County Along SR 3, there are also areas of rural development, urban industrial, rural residential, and commercial /mixed use developments, such as the planned expansion of the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) The adoption of the SKIA Sub -Area Plan in 2003 set the stage for the allocation of industrial capacity and land -use designations to locate what is envisioned as a mayor, private sector employment center The goal of this plan is to allow development of compact, individually master planned industrial and business parks that will provide opportunities for development and create or retain professional, technical, and manufacturing employment March 2012 - Final 36 Bremerton Economic Development Study What are the population growth trends in the study area? In 2009, the estimated population of the entire state of Washington was about 6 7 million people Only five percent of that figure resides in the two counties that comprise the study area, with estimates of 56,800 and 247,600 residents for Mason and Kitsap counties, respectively There are five incorporated cities within Mason and Kitsap Counties Shelton to Mason County, Bremerton, Bainbridge Island, Poulsbo, and Port Orchard in Kitsap County The remaining communities are unincorporated, yet comprise a large part of the residential population, especially in Mason County During the 15 -year period from 1990 to 2005, the population of Bremerton, the largest city in Kitsap County, decreased by approximately nine percent, but has rebounded by nearly six percent from 2005 to 2009 This decrease in Bremerton's population has been offset somewhat by an increase in neighboring Port Orchard of 65 percent for the same 15 -year period Between 2005 and 2009, Port Orchard's growth has slowed to nearly two percent Shelton, in Mason County, experienced modest population growth, from 7,241 in 1990 to 8,965 in 2009 or approximately a 24 percent increase Exhibit 2 -10 Population Growth by Cities in the Study Area 4SO00 00 000 $ - - -- — - -- - - -- 35 00o 30000 25 000 20 000 1b000 --- -- 10 000 m _ 5,000 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2009 - --City of BREMEMON —City ol PORT tlRMARD —t 1V&SKLION Source Office of Financial Management (Intercensal and Postcensal Estimates, Revised June 2009) March 2012 - Final 37 Bre E conom i c Deve Study A significant percentage of the population for both Mason and Kitsap Counties live in unincorporated areas and this is where the majority of population growth during the 19 -year period from 1990 to 2009 has occurred in both counties, whereas on a statewide basis the growth in population has occurred in incorporated areas Exhibit 2 -11 Incorporated Area and Unincorporated Area Population Increase (1990 -2009) i 1C+6% � I s , s A04 � IWO Mas�lcauRty IatsapS�iu1►ty �iS�IhFj� '911 0IncopaaatedAltai MUntnecipatatedAicat Source Office of Financial Management (Intercensal and Postcensal Estimates Revised June 2009) March 2012 -Final 38 Bremerton Economic Development Study What are the environmental conditions within the study area? The study area is included in the Puget Sound region The Puget Sound ecosystem is one of the most ecologically diverse in North America, containing a wide range of internationally significant species and habitats It is a place of rare biological diversity and high economic value Its health and productivity affects the region's quality of life Within the study area, there are several streams and wetlands that dram into Puget Sound Increased run -oft from traffic, if not treated properly, can impact the quality of the Puget Sound ecosystem There are also many species of wildlife, including several species that are classified as threatened or endangered that live within the study area Consideration of wildlife needs to be given during the design of any improvement to these habitat areas A general summary of the region's environment was prepared as part of this study and is included in Appendix 2 March 2012 - Final 39 Bremerton Economic Development Study What is the safety analysis along the study corridors? The WSDOT uses two procedures that make use of GIS data to screen state highways to identify Sites with Potential for Improvement The Types of Collisions first procedure is Collision Analysis Location, or CAL The CAL is . Fatality Collisions are a quarter -mile analysis, using the last five years of collision data and collisions that resulted in at entered into MS Excel to generate results that are then mapped in least one fatality GIS Fatal, serious, and evident injury collisions become points for • Serious lniury Collisions ARM along a route These points applies to collisions h where an each Accumulated Route Mile (ARM) g p injury occurs which prevents are compared to adjacent points and if they are located within one- the inured person from quarter rule of each other it becomes a segment and is assigned walking, driving or continuing a segment number with a beginning and ending ARM value The normal activities at the time of the collision segments are analyzed to determine the various (Fatal, Serious Injury, . Evident lniury Collisions are or Evident Injury) collision totals If the segment has six or more collisions that involve any Evident Injury collisions and four or more Fatal and Serious Injury injury other than fatal or collisions, as well as no planned safety (subprogram I -2) project over serious injuries that can be observed at the scene the next six years, the segment is retained on the CAL list If not, no Possible Ind the Collisions are additional analysis is performed collisions that include any injury reported to the officer or The second procedure is the Collision Analysis Corridor, or CAC The claimed by the individual CAC is an analysis, using the latest five -year period of collision data, No Injury (Property Damage Only) Collisions are collisions inputted into MS Excel to generate results which are then mapped in in which the officer at the GIS Fatal and Serious Injury collisions become points along a route scene has no reason to Any five -mile segment with a history of 11 or more Fatal or Serious believe that, at the time of the Injury collisions would then be included in the CAC list collision the person received any bodily harm due to the collision A third analysis procedure was approved by WSDOT in June 2010 as part of a federal safety stewardship agreement This procedure is the Intersection Analysis Location (IAL) which produces a list of prioritized safety improvement needs that ranks the intersections by the societal costs which are generated from fatal, serious, and evident injury accidents at the intersection during a five -year period and consideration of collisions that involve "entering at an angle ", "rear- end ", and "opposite direction" collision types These improvement projects are prioritized on a statewide basis, using average societal cost per each target intersection The most recent safety data assembled (2004 — 2008) for the CAC and CAL analysis shows that SR 3 contains both a CAC and a CAL March 2012 -Final 40 Bremerton Economic Development Study The CAC stretches for five miles from milepost 0 (at the function with SR 101) to milepost 5 (to the northeast of the city limits of Shelton ) Federal law 23 United States According to the safety data there were a total of 402 collisions along Code 409 governs use of the this CAC, with 4 fatalities that occurred between MP 0 0 (SR 3 /SR 101 data contained in this discussion regarding collisions Under Junction) and MP 10 Oust south of the Shelton city limits) A further this law data maintained for breakdown of the analysis shows that the predormnant collision types purposed of evaluating potential were rear end (152 collisions or 56 %) followed by striking or being highway safety enhancements o Shall not be subject to struck by an object (79 collisions or 20 0 /o) and entering at an angle (46 discovery or admitted into collisions or 11 0 /4) The main recorded contributing factors to these evidence in a federal or state collisions were following too closely (77 collisions or 19°/,) and not court proceeding or considered yielding the right -of -way (54 collisions or 13 %) for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location The data also shows that of the 402 collisions, a majority of the mentioned or addressed in such collisions (224 or 56 %) reported no injuries followed by possible injury reports, surveys, schedules, (121 collisions or 30 %) and then evident injury (37 collisions or 9 °/0) lists, or data " If anyone attempts to use this data in an action for damages against WSDOT the There is also a CAL on SR 3 for about one -half mile from Lake Flora State of Washington, or any Road north to the Bremerton National Airport (milepost 28 78 to other jurisdiction involved in the locations mentioned in the data, milepost 29 30) This CAL contains 35 total collisions and one fatality, these entities expressly reserve which occurred at the SR 3 /Lake Flora Road intersection the right, under Section 409 to object to the use of the data, The safety analysis shows that the two leading causes of including any opinions drawn collisions were speeding (12 collisions or 34`%,) and not granting the from the data right -of -way (7 collisions or 21 %) with other categories comprising the remaining 16 collisions Of the 35 total collisions, the safety analysis shows that 17 collisions (49°/0) reported no injuries, 8 collisions (23°/,) reported possible injury, and 6 collisions (17 %) reported evident injury Based on a review of the collision data from 2004 to 2008, there were two other sites along SR 3 that were initially identified as possible CALs These sites were within the Belfair area • MP 23 00 to MP 24 05 between Lucky Lane and south of E Hemming Way Lane to dust south of the SR 3 /SR300 intersection in downtown Belfair • MP 24 35 to MP 26 10 from north of E Hemming Way Lane in Belfair March 2012 - Final 41 Bremerton Economic Development Study The analysis showed that both of the segments had six or more Evident Injury collisions and four or more Fatal and Serious Injury collisions However, because the SR 3 Belfair Area Widening and Safety Improvements project is being planned and is currently funded for construction in 2012, these segments are not included in the statewide CAL list The IAL analysis used the most recent safety data with the societal costs generated from fatal, serious, and evident injury accidents at the intersection during a five -year, period from 2004 through 2008 This analysis identified the list of intersection locations that meets the IAL criteria There are four intersections along the SR 3 corridor within the BEDS study area that meet the IAL criteria, as listed below Intersection Description Programmed MP 37 31 SR3/Werner Rd On- and Off -Ramp No MP 25 51 SR3 /Roessel Rd Intersection Yes (12 Safety Project ID 300344D) MP 23 23 SR3 /SR 302 Victor Cutoff Rd Intersection No MP 10 76 SR3 /Pickering Rd Intersection No One of the four intersections, SR 3 Roessel Road intersection, is located in Belfair and is already programmed and funded for safety improvements, as part of the Belfair Area Safety & Widening Improvements Project The mobility analysis also identified one intersection as a mobility need location, based on the BEDS traffic analysis This intersection is the SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road /SR 16 Spur intersection Based on these analyses, there are three intersections that are identified as safety need locations and one intersection is identified as a mobility need location Due to the economy, an emphasis was placed on identifying these safety and mobility needs for the next six to ten years, rather than the longer -term needs as identified in the BEDS study March 2012 -Final 42 Bremerton Economic Development Study How are safety issues being addressed? As part of a federal safety stewardship agreement, the WSDOT Safety Executives identified the analysis tools and the minimum acceptable performance levels required to obtain the Target Zero goals on state highways to reduce fatalities and serious injury accidents to zero in the state of Washington by 2030 For more information on Target Zero, please see http / /targetzero com/ WSDOT receives a federal safety apportionment on an annual basis for addressing statewide safety needs These safety funds will be used to address the safety needs identified from the Collision Analysis Locations (CAL), Collision Analysis Corridors (CAC), and Intersection Analysis Locations (IAL), as part of the federal safety stewardship agreement The identified CAC /CAL needs are currently being addressed using the federal safety apportionment For the CAC along SR 3 from MP 0 0 to MP 5 0 (from US 101 to Shelton), safety improvements, including the installation of guiderails and rumble strips along the sides and in the median, were implemented For the CAL along SR 3 from MP 27 78 to MP 29 30 (from Lake Flora Road to a half mile north), safety improvements, including the installation of a right -turn lane at Lake Flora Road, the construction of a center acceleration lane, widen SR 3 in the vicinity of the intersection and the installation of shoulder and centerline rumble strips, are already programmed to be implemented Most of the identified current needs in transportation improvements along the BEDS corridor are already addressed, or will be addressed as part of the 2020 improvements However, there are some locations that still need safety and mobility improvements, as identified through the IAL analysis March 2012 - Final 43 Bremerton Economic Development Study The safety and mobility locations that should be improved when funding is available are as follows 1 SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road /SR 16 Spur, MP 36 26 - This location is identified as a Mobility Need Location This intersection is recommended for improvement A detailed geometric, traffic and safety analysis of the intersections is needed to determine the appropriate improvement, including consideration for additional channelization, signal modifications, or redesign to a roundabout configuration 2 SR 3 /SR 302 Victor Cutoff Road intersection, MP 23 23 - This location is identified as a Safety Need Location This intersection is recommended for improvement A detailed geometric, traffic and safety analysis of the intersections is needed to determine the appropriate improvement, including consideration for additional channelization, signalization, or redesign to a roundabout configuration 3 SR 3 /Pickering Road, MP 10 76 - This location is identified as a Safety Need Location This intersection is recommended for improvement A detailed geometric, traffic and safety analysis of the intersection is needed to determine the appropriate improvement, including consideration for additional channelization, signalization, or redesign to a roundabout configuration 4 SR 3/Werner Road /Loxie Eagans Boulevard northbound and southbound ramp intersections, MP 37 31 - This location is identified as a Safety Need Location These intersections are recommended for improvement A detailed geometric, traffic and safety analysis of the intersections is needed to determne the appropriate improvement, including consideration for additional channelization, signal modifications, or redesign to a roundabout configuration As the economy recovers, and if future conditions along the corridor evolve differently than anticipated in this study, the data used to develop the recommendations for this study should be updated or reevaluated March 2012 -Final 44 Bremerton Economic Development Study Chapter 3 - Existing and Future Traffic Conditions How was the traffic analysis conducted? This chapter describes For roadway operations along the study corridors, the Highway the existing and future Capacity Software (HCS) was used to evaluate the level of service and S 101, na 3, and along traffic analyses alon operating speeds Synchro software was used to analyze signalized and stop controlled intersections Each of these software techniques are U U used to analyze specific locations and do not reflect delays and queues project to The e methodology 2020 and logy resulting from other intersections traffic volumes, as well These software packages use capacity and level -of- service to analyze as the corridor analysis roadway operations, based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and intersection analysis (HCM), developed by the Transportation Research Board Capacity used to determine corridor is defined on page 2 -2 of the 2000 HCM as "the maximum hourly rate bottlenecks and needs are at which persons or vehicles reasonably can be expected to traverse a presented for this study point or a uniform section of a lane or roadway during a given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions " To analyze the quality of service on a roadway and at intersections, the 2000 Highisay Capacity Manual uses level -of- service (LOS) which is "a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience" (See HCM, Transportation Research Board, 2000, page 2 -2) Six LOS categories are used to describe the quality of the transportation system These LOS categories range from LOS `A' through LOS `F' with LOS `E' being the point where the traffic demand on the roadway is equal to the capacity of the roadway LOS is defined differently for different roadway classifications and intersections March 2012 - Final 45 Bremerton Economic Development Study For highway segments, WSDOT has developed a congestion measurement approach, using a comparison of posted speeds and operating speeds WSDOT's Congestion Measurement Thresholds are listed in Exhibit 3 -1 (Based on 60 MPH Posted Speeds on State Highways) Exhibit 3 -1 Congestion Measurement for State Highways Condition Highway Speed Posted Speed 52 mph or above (Posted Speed) Maximum 51 mph to 42 mph (about 85% to 70% of Posted Throughput Speed Congestion 1 Less than 41 mph (below 70% of Posted Speed) Source WSDOT s Congestion Measurement Approach Evaluating System Performance January 2008 As part of their `Highway System Plan 2007 - 2026,' WSDOT has used the rating of `below 70% of posted speed' as the threshold to determine if a roadway segment performs below WSDOT's predefined threshold This threshold was used for this study For intersections, LOS is defined differently for signalized and unsignalized intersections For signalized intersections, LOS is defined by the amount of control delay, which is a measure of a driver's discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and increased travel time LOS at signalized intersections is stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle for all approaches, typically for a 15- minute analysis period, and the overall intersection March 2012 -Final 46 Bremerton Ec Development Study For unsignalized intersections, LOS is defined by the amount of control delay, but the LOS thresholds are different from those of a signalized intersection to reflect different driver expectations LOS is also measured differently for Two -Way Stop Controlled (TWSC) intersections and All -Way Stop Controlled (AWSC) intersections For TWSC intersections, controlled delay is defined for each minor (stopped controlled) movement LOS is not defined for the whole intersection For AWSC intersections, LOS is calculated for each approach, as well as the whole intersection A summary of the LOS thresholds for signalized and unsignalized intersections is shown in Exhibit 3 -2 Exhibit 3 -2 Intersection LOS standards LOS - SIGNALIZED LOS - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTIONS AVERAGE AVERAGE LOS CONTROL DELAY LOS CONTROL DELAY PER VEHICLE PER VEHICLE (SecNeh) (SecNeh) A =/< 10 sec A =/< 10 sec B >10 -20 sec B >10 -15 sec C >20 - 35 sec C >15 - 25 sec D >35 - 55 sec D >25 - 35 sec E >55 - 80 sec E >35 - 50 sec F >80 sec F >50 sec Source 2000 Highway Capacity Manual March 2012 - Final 47 Bremerton Economic Development Study What are the existing traffic conditions along the study corridors? Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is the conventional method by which planners and engineers gain an initial perspective about traffic and congestion in any given corridor These traffic volumes are based on actual vehicle counts which are adjusted by seasonal factors to account for traffic volume variations that occur during the course of a year These seasonal adjustment factors are applied to ADT values to give Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) values which are more indicative of daily traffic volumes For this study, traffic counts were taken only on April 8 -10, 2008 at 15 locations along the study corridors and at 26 intersections Intersection volumes are available at three other selected locations Exhibit 3 -3 presents a summary of the 2008 AADT traffic data collected along the study corridors The highest AADT volumes are in Segment 4 in the Gorst area, while the lowest are in Segment 3 through rural Mason County Well designed intersections are critical to the smooth and steady flow of traffic along the roadways, as well as safety It is here that conflicting movements emerge with potential negative effects on throughput and safety Intersection performance is one way of determining the quality of traffic flow March 2012 -Final 48 Br emerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 3 -4 summarizes the roadway and intersection analysis results As shown on the exhibits, there are currently five intersections along the study corridors that operate below WSDOT's standard of LOS D Four of these intersections are unsignalized and one intersection is signalized The below standard intersections are listed here • Johns Prairie Road currently operates at LOS F Its intersection with SR 3 is skewed and has high left - turning traffic onto SR 3 • The US 101 NB ramp with Wallace Kneeland Boulevard operates at LOS F, because of the amount of traffic exiting US 101 through a stop control intersection • The SR 16 NB ramp intersection with Old Clifton Road /Tremont Street operates at LOS F due to heavy traffic movements, especially exiting traffic from the northbound off -ramp • The SR 16 SB ramp intersection with Clifton Road/Tremont Street operates at LOS F due to heavy traffic movements, especially exiting traffic turning right from the off -ramp • The SR 3 signalized intersection with SR 16 Spur /Sam Christopherson Road in the Gorst area currently operates at an overall rating of LOS E It contains multiple movements that operate at LOS E or F There are also approximately 12 5 miles of roadway that fall below the 70 percent threshold These sections include • SR 3 within the Shelton area • SR 3 from Sam Christopherson Road to SR 304 • SR 16 from Sedgwick Road (SR 160) to its junction with SR 3 • US 101 from SR 3 to the Wallace Kneeland Interchange March 2012 - Final 49 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 3 -3 2008 Annual Average Daily Traffic Summary t l LoxieEagansBlvd ,Brerner#on 44,000 - 30 f 67,000 73 000 Sunnyslope Ro port Orcharml SR 168 �— = 43,000 Mason CouOt) I %= Gorst '' 19,000 ' ' perm Way 16 �� • 17 000 • Sedgwick Road Belf Lake Fl Roa • I • 1 5,000 ' 1 300 t Kttsap County '� s • North Bay Road King County • 10 Ally n r , • r view Loop Road • - Pierce .County . �soa $ 6,704 A O1 : 13,000 J i Pickering Re 11,000 ■ ate Road LEGEND 0 anon Lake Road &wwW li���e S" W - Ftnaelnad Blvd Study Candor M Shelton - I* Segment Break Point 4ttaiton Matlock Road 1 1T 000 2006 AADT ISO + R3 / •`�....�. 1 T 000 f March 2012 -Final 50 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 3 -4 2008 Traffic Conditions Summary 4 I t Lo)de Eagans Blvd �y B e11 r#ot1' / Sam Christopherson Road �r Sumryslope Road --c Orchclyd L' Clifton Road ' Mason County Gors 160 mperlal Way Sedgwick Ro Belfair a� Ty Lake Rora Road to Cove 30 Vtsap County 16 4 , SR 3 2 ( -.�..NOrth Bay Road �� (q' King County &ter � Lakeland Orive� t' 10 ,�Q s �? Allyn Crook Road - -Pterce Coun McEwan Prairie Rd/Mason Its R r elf ,. Anthony Roa }�( pevlew Loop Road { LEGEND 01 Pickering Road GrapbWe oop Road BrerrermnEarnmcOeudo 7 pnerd Study Agate Road1 m �as"on� on Road ° t� Travel speed 45% of posted speed McEwanPraldeRd!&ockdand J 1 sfantl�A�r9road� C Travel s t>efvveen70 %and 85 %of nb er reek Road + Travel speed 70% of posted speed 10 '�._Cranber Creek Road{ f § r � AHMULEWIV tarts Belfair Area ftenmg & Safety Project ason Lake oad • IrdersedonLOS A or 8 Wa0a Kneelaid 'Sheltone �,� �` 0 IrdersechonLOS C or 0 Shelton 11letiock Road I/C�� • bdersechon LOS E or F `fi �� 3 Note Travel speed refers to PM peals hour travel � g speed akugl roadway aeon March 2012 - Final 51 Bremerton E Devel s What are the future traffic conditions? To determine future operational performance of the study area, long - range traffic forecasts for the year 2030 were estimated, as well as for the interim year 2020 These volumes were then analyzed to determine the interim and long -range traffic conditions The forecast assumes that the Lake Flora Connector (also referred to as the South Kitsap Industrial Area Connector) between SR 3 and SR 16 is completed, as well as the new roadway around the east side of the Bremerton National Airport Forecast Methodology Two travel demand models were found to be applicable for providing 2008 -2030 traffic growth rates for the study area • The most current Kitsap County travel demand model • The city of Shelton Transportation Plan model For the study area, traffic forecasts were developed using data from both models For these forecasts, the SR 3 corridor was divided into three sections one section west of the Shelton Urban Growth Area (UGA) northern boundary, another between the Shelton UGA boundary and the Kitsap /Mason County line, and the last east of the Kitsap /Mason County line to the end of the study area For the area west of the Shelton UGA northern boundary, the year 2030 annual average weekday,traffic (AAWDT) PM peak -hour forecasts were based on the Shelton transportation forecasting model as stated above Because the model network included US 101, SR 3, and the intersecting arterials, the intersection turning movement forecasts were obtained directly from the model These forecasts were then post - processed to provide the adjusted intersection turning movements and corridor balancing along with the rest of the corridor forecasts for the year 2030 For the area east of the Kitsap /Mason County line to the end of the study area, traffic forecasts were based on the current Kitsap County travel demand model The post - processed traffic forecasts were developed by Kitsap County and provided to the project team March 2012 -Final 52 Bremerton Economic Development Study The area between the Shelton UGA boundary and the Kitsap /Mason County Line was not part of either the city of Shelton transportation plan model or Kitsap County travel demand model To develop 2030 corridor and intersection turning movement forecasts, a growth rate was calculated by averaging the growth rates from the intersections located at the east end of the Shelton model (Mason Lake Road) and west end of the Kitsap model (Lake Flora Road) The resulting 4 2 percent annual growth rate was developed and applied to the 2008 PM peak hour intersection approach and corridor volumes For the interim year 2020 forecasts, the existing 2007/2008 volumes and the forecasted 2030 volumes were used Based on the growth rate at each analysis point, 2020 traffic volumes were projected over the base 2008 volumes Future Year Volumes The estimated 2020 and 2030 future year AADT volumes are shown on Exhibit 3 -5 These increase in range from a growth of nearly 37 percent on SR 16 north of the Sedgwick Road Interchange to almost 260 percent on SR 3 through the SKIA industrial area March 2012 - Final 53 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 3 -5 2020/2030 Average Daily Traffic Summary l Loxie Eagans Blvd Wernoi vd , 58,000171,000 F / 32,00055000 78,0001 30 72,060181,000 SunnysiopeRoad 10200 Ort Orcl -ace! yr` J L SR 166 S6,000R7,Q00 GOrst , Mason CouOty 1 32,000158,000 2o,00aao 000 � P•iiar Way 88dgwlck Road Belf - r Lake Flora Road 45,66082,000 � ■ _ 17,000126,006 1 00 Kitsap County 16 i North Bay Road King County ■ 15,000123 OOO J ' ' ° Allyn so , j • - • Cyapeview loop Road r' Pierce County ■ • 3 10 000114 000 ' ■ 13,000!18,000 1 • : h t• • ir(ckering Roa • 12,00820 000 ■ { LEGEND 1 ° y ate Road ason Lake Road flret wft Eow mic: D velop wt Study Wallace Krleelnad Blvd r_ Study Corridor 17,000127 000 A �1 S ment Break Point S*Iton Matlock Road Sh elton r • 11,000120,000 - - 17,00a20 oeo 202012030 Average Daly Traffic 0127 18,00,000 R S March 2012 -Final 54 Bremerton Economic Development Study Future Year Traffic Analyses A summary of the 2020 and 2030 future year highway and intersection analyses are shown on Exhibits 3 -6 and 3 -7 The Belfair area was not included in these analyses because this area has been extensively analyzed in the Belfair Bypass Study and the SR 3 Belfair Area Widening and Safety Improvements Project The results and recommendations of these recent studies are included in this study by reference More details about these studies are available on the WSDOT web site www wsdot wa gov /projects /sr3 /belfairbypass/ The highway segment performance analysis for the study corridors uses the WSDOT's "Percent of Posted Speed" method to be consistent with the current Highway System Plan By applying this methodology, the 2020 roadway performance of the state highways within the study area degrades to `less than 70% of the posted speed' for most of the corridor More than 25 miles of the corridor will be operating at `less than 70% of the posted speed' in 2020 By 2030, nearly 35 miles of the corridor within the study area degrades to less than 70 percent of the posted speed The only exception is the roadway section on SR 3 between Pickering Road to Grapeview Loop Road (north end), which maintains about 72 percent of the posted speed in 2030 and along US 101 between SR 102 and the Wallace Kneeland Interchange, which maintains about 71 percent of posted speed This last area is likely to deteriorate if the capacity through the segment to the south is widened to four lanes The intersection performance analysis was conducted using the Highway Capacity Manual level -of- service (LOS) methodology and minimum threshold of LOS D The 2020 intersection results showed that 22 of the 29 intersections analyzed are below LOS D without improvements By 2030, the number of intersections below LOS D increases to 26 locations Many of the intersections poor performance are caused by excess delays on the cross streets or ramps where vehicles are waiting to access the main highways March 2012 - Final 55 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 3 -6 2020 Traffic Conditions Summary ' o 3 ` loxta Pagans Blvd � + � - -� �,,B�eme�rton / J Sam Christopherson Road 30 SunnyslopeRoa ort Orchacel Clifton Ro Mason County ( Gorst _ 1 M= 7 mpertal Way gwick Ro C Belfair ; (twolydersectl no) ake Rora Road f e **_Beffalr Bypass I Drive 300 K tsap County 16 Norm Bay Roan King County Lakeland Drive Allyn �� " = r ` herwood Creek Road r Pierce C+bunty J Anthony Road -3 pevlew Loop Road Pickering Rea p ) LEGEND 01 as a e Res �/ aP*4 op Road, Brewrtm Eton* Development Stody ` �a oa n Rpad siista Travel speed � of ported speed McEwan Prairie RdR on flake Rd "� Lisla b r d W. d r= Travel speed men 70% and 85%of McEwan Prairie RdlBroekdalC Rd� \ Door Creek Road Pfd speed Travel ` 70%ofpostedspe 10 i Cranberry Creek Road � s� speed e� 8elfac Area Widenng 8 Safety Prgw ason Lake Road • Irdersecbon LOS A or 8 otms Prairie R wallaca, neelartd Blvd ,� , r ' Irdersecdon LOS C or D s h - • IrdersecbanLOS E or F 8heltonldatlockRoa Note, Travdspeed refers toPM peak hourtravd � J �t8R r 1 �eedWong roadwaycec6on March 2012 -Final 56 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 3 -7 2030 Traffic Conditions Summary ' � f Loxie Eagans Bl B 1 em erto n 30 ` Sam Christopherson Roa SumrystopeRoa ort orchard Clifton Ito Mason County G0 1 gQ • Imperial Way Sedgwick Roams / C Belfair Lake Flora Road (two lydwsegl6rts) ° M�Belfalr Bypass Ita Drive 30 ; ° SR � ltsap County 16 / North Bay Road A / King County 1 06 Lakeland Drive 30 ` Ally i Sh erwo od Road Pierce Coun 3 paview Loop Road Pickering Ro LEGEND 01 A to Roa Gaper( oop Road Bremerton Economic M ason 8e / r�on Road aRrrr TrvM speed posted speed McEwan Prairie Rd/Mason Lake Rd .island View Road Travel speed behmm 70%and 85%of McEwan Prairie RdlBrockdala Rd� Pfd steed Deer Creek Road 1 0 Cranberry Creek Road Travel speed <70% of posted speed Cron Lake Road ` Sethr Area Widermg & Safety ohms Prairie R e IrddsectnnlOS A or B Wallace Kneels d 8(W IntersectronLOS C or D • IntersectronLOS E or F Shelton Matlock Roa Note• Travel speed refers to PM peak hour travel SR speed along road*W secbm March 2012 - Final 57 Bremerton Economic Development Study Where are the existing and future bottlenecks and congested areas? Corridor segments are considered to be in need when they operate below 70 percent of the posted speed during the peak period Intersections are considered to be in need when they operate below the LOS D threshold In addition, corridor segments are also considered in need where they have a documented safety problem For this study, the intersections and study corridor's segments highlighted in red on Exhibit '3 -6 and Exhibit 3 -7 are considered to be in need based on the operational analysis From a safety perspective, the key areas to examine along SR 3 include • MP 0 58 to MP 1 19 between King Road and the south Shelton city limit • MP 7 76 to MP 8 73 from north of Mason Lake Road to Cranberry Creek Road • MP 23 00 to MP 24 05 between north of Lake Devereaux Road and south of Judy Road between Allyn and Belfair • MP 24 35 to MP 26 10 in the Belfair area • MP 28 78 to MP 29 30 between Lake Flora Road and south of Imperial Way • MP 0 00 to MP 5 00 from the SR NUS 101 interchange to dust outside the northeast city limits of Shelton Collisions, especially those involving injuries and fatalities, along the study corridors also result in the highway being closed for extended periods while the collision is being investigated There is no easy way for traffic to pass safely around a collision site along much of the SR 3 corridor March 2012 -Final 58 Bremerton Economic Development Study Was a Sinclair Inlet Bridge analyzed? The possibility of constructing a bridge across Sinclair Inlet was briefly looked at towards the end of the study For decades there has been interest in having a bridge span the Inlet The theory is a bridge would reduce travel times and distance between Bremerton and Port Orchard, thereby reducing congestion on SR 3 in the Gorst area Evaluating a bridge was not originally in the BEDS scope of work or budget However, various local policy makers requested that a bridge be analyzed and the study team incorporated such an analysis into the project scope The project team examined past efforts and analyses that were done regarding a Sinclair Inlet Bridge In January 1994, the "SR16 /SR3 Corridor Analysis" (referred from here on as the "1994 Analysis ") was released This report was done in conjunction with WSDOT, Kitsap County, and the city of Bremerton and prepared by Parametrix, Inc, a private transportation consulting firm While the "1994 Analysis" contained three potential alignments (I, J, and K) for a bridge across the Sinclair Inlet, the BEDS project team focused on an alignment similar to Alignment K, which would span from Port Orchard to the SR3 /SR304 interchange This alignment was chosen due to discussions with local policy makers in which most of them expressed such an alignment as their preference for an analysis For consistency with other traffic modeling efforts done for BEDS, the project team used the year 2030 for its traffic model analysis and a full SKIA build out For this analysis, the PSRC regional model was used It produced similar data to the model used in the original analysis The analysis looked at how many vehicles would utilize the proposed alignment, the travel time saved by drivers using the alignment, and if the alignment would negate the need to widen SR 3 between the SR 16 and SR 304 interchanges Summaries of traffic volumes around the Sinclair Inlet area without and with a new Sinclair Inlet Bridge are shown on Exhibits 3 -8 and 3 -9 March 2012 - Final 59 Bremerton Economic Development Study The analysis showed • Travel time would be reduced by 10 minutes between Port Orchard and Bremerton if a bridge was constructed and no improvements were made to SR 3 between the SR 16 and SR 304 interchanges i • The 102,OOO,vehicle trips on SR 3 between SR 16 and SR 304 mterchanges,would be reduced to 31,000 vehicles • Approximately 76,000 vehicle trips would be drawn onto the new bridge from the segment of SR 16 between the SR 3 /SR 16 interchange and Port Orchard • The amount of traffic on the 4 lane bridge would have a slightly higher level of congestion than SR 3 north of the Gorst area where in 2006 traffic volumes were 71,000 vehicles per day • A new or reconstructed interchange would be needed at the bridge's start /touchdown point at or before SR 16 and SR 166 • A new or reconstructed SR 3 /SR 304 interchange would be required • Connection to SR 166 would be difficult due to elevations • SR 3 between SR 16 and Sam Christopherson Road would still need to be widened since the bridge is not a logical option for travelers on SR 3 headed to or from the Bremerton Airport /Belfair/ Mason County areas • The SR 3 /SR 16 interchange would still need to be improved March 2012 -Final 60 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 3 -8 2030 Sinclair Inlet Area Traffic Volumes without New Bridge 4 3 4,140 1 8,975 i (34,60 (76,000 I _ F I f 304 12,240 (102,000) 168 (19,000) .� 3 - r t 6,636 _ - _ (46,000) 16 _ 9,726 (81,000) 9 f �3 10,900 w ; --- - (90,800) I f 3 i PM Peak Hour - _f (Dally Volume) 16 I 2030 Baseline Assumptions • No highway improvements • SKIA build out Volumes • 2030 PM peak hour (in red) and daily (in black) two -way traffic volumes are shown Results • SR 3 and SR 16 are in fading condition during PM peak hour in 2030 March 2012 - Final 61 Breme Eco Development Study Exhibit 3 -9 2030 Sinclair Inlet Area Traffic Volumes with New Bridge 3 304 9,000 ,r (75,000) r 4,100 (34,500) Generic Sinclair Inlet Bridge for traffic analysis purposes 9,100 *`` 3,700 (75,900) (31,000) �/ 1,700 166 ~ .-- / (19,000) 3 6,600 (46,000) 9,700 1,800 (81,000) 3 16 (16,000) - – — - 16 _ t Bridge Assumptions • 4 -lane bridge structure • 2030 Forecast Year • No widening of SR 3 between SR 3 /SR 16 interchange and the SR3 /SR304 interchange • SKIA build out • Cost estimates — TBD 'Bridge alignment is not final and is only for traffic modeling analysis for this report A specific bridge alignment, plus its take off /touch down points, would need to be studied further in any future analysis that might be done regarding a possible span across the Sinclair Inlet Volumes • 2030 PM peak hour (in red) and daily (in black) two -way traffic volumes are shown March 2012 -Final 62 Bremerton Economic Development Study Given the limited availability of state transportation revenues and pressing demands for state and federal investments to address transportation problems elsewhere in the state, it is highly unlikely a badge across the Sinclair Inlet would become a state priority and, if pursued, would likely need to be a local endeavor There was discussion regarding tolls helping to pay for a badge However, an analysis would need to be conducted to determine toll rates and what affects those rates would have on traffic diversion Would a toll divert a significant amount of traffic from the bridge to SR 3, thereby overloading that highway and requiring expensive improvements and upgrades and neutralizing any benefits of a bridge? The BEDS report is not making a recommendation regarding the pursuit of a bridge It is a complex issue that requires a more in -depth analysis that would need to review tolling, potential environmental impacts, tribal fishing rights, navy and civilian maritime operations, public outreach, and cost estimates to construct such a structure These items are more than what could have been accomplished under the limited BEDS project budget March 2012 - Final 63 This page intentionally left blank Bremerton Economic Development Study Chapter 4 - Study Corridors Long -Range Vision How were the study corridors long -range visions This chapter describes developed? the long range vision of Each corridor segment vision was drafted by the study team the corridor to meet future and refined by the project stakeholders Each vision takes into traffic projects, encourage consideration the long -range infrastructure related to future growth, and provide a population and employment growth based on the adopted local sound transportation land use plans, future year traffic projections, community visions infrastructure to support compatibility, and environmental concerns the area economy A safety analysis was also performed that included a review of the collisions that have occurred between 2004 and 2008 (see Chapter 2) and through discussions with stakeholders and the public This process identified recommended improvements that could reduce the severity and frequency of collisions and injuries, as well as ways to provide for emergency vehicle access to collision sites These improvements included improved intersection operations to reduce conflicts, wider shoulders for more vehicle recovery area and emergency access, rumble strips to warn drivers that they are straying out of the designated lane, and improved signage To enhance mobility, each segment vision implies that over time various strategic transportation investments will be needed to meet the long -range traffic needs beyond 2020 Investments will be needed to support area employment and population growth, reduce conflict points, provide optimal intersection spacing, maintain traffic flow while allowing safe access, and, within population centers, include traffic calming techniques to maintain safe and steady traffic speeds The vision for each corridor segment also provides for unproved non - motorized travel by providing bike lanes through growing urban areas, such as Belfair and Allyn, providing wider shoulders, and supporting off - corridor trails March 2012 - Final 65 Bremerton Economic Development Study What is the long -range vision for the corridor? The transportation infrastructure needed to maintain economic growth varies by safety and traffic issues, community values, and the environment To better reflect varying conditions within the study area, the BEDS' long -range corridor vision varies by study segment and highway, as defined on the following pages Each segment vision represents the long -range goal for the corridor, which in some areas may be beyond the planning horizon of this study Exhibits 4 -1 through 4 -13 show visions for each section of the four segments in the corridor Qy Mason County O What is the vision for Segment 1? SR 102 ftbm W FUS M PA Through Segment 1, the long -range vision includes safety and mobility improvements for US 101 and SR 3, varying by access control and location Section A US 101 from Wallace Kneeland Boulevard to SR 102 — The vision for this section includes • Widen the two -lane highway to a four -lane highway with eight -foot shoulders and rumble strips • Improve the US 101 /SR 102 intersection as warranted with roundabout, signal, and /or additional channelization • Limit all other side street access to right - in/right -out only • Provide a two -foot centerline median with rumble strip Exhibit 4 -1 Typical Cross Section - US 101 (Wallace Kneeland Boulevard to SR 102) Shoulder Travel Travel Travel Travel Shadder Lane Lane Zsne tan€ r try wNh ,� * i na�le str(R ' 3 Segment 1 - Section A Conceptual Design March 2012 -Final 66 Bremerton Economic Development Study Section B US 101 from SR 3 to Wallace Kneeland Boulevard — The vision for this section includes • Extend the existing liimted access, four -lane highway from south of SR 3 to the Wallace Kneeland Boulevard Interchange • Improve ramp terminal intersections by providing roundabouts, signals, or additional channelization, as warranted • Limit all side street access to right- in/right -out only Exhibit 4 -2 Typical Cross Section - US 101 (SR 3 to Wallace Kneeland Boulevard) } shoulder, Travel Travel Median Median Travel Travel Shoulder L:L Segment 1 - Section B Conceptual Design Section C SR 3 from US 101 to south City Limits — The vision for this section includes • Four -lane highway with a center median that may be used for left turns and eight -foot outside shoulders with rumble strips • Improve intersections where warranted with additional channelization • Provide intersection spacing in accordance with WSDOT's access management requirements and limit driveways to right- in/right -out Exhibit 4 -3 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 (South of Shelton) Shoulde Travel Travel flan Travel Travel Shoulder -j- Lane I care Segment 1 - Section C Conceptual Design March 2012 - Final 67 Bremerton Economic Development Study Section D SR 3 from the eastern Shelton City Limits north to Mason Lake Road — The vision for this section includes • Four -lane highway with eight -foot outside shoulders with rumble strips • Improve intersections where warranted with additional channelization • Provide intersection spacing in accordance with WSDOT's access management requirements and linut driveways to right- in/right -out • Provide a two -foot centerline median with a rumble strip Through the city of Shelton - The two -mile section through the Shelton area will remain as it is currently configured as either a two- or four -lane city street with curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and parking lanes Exhibit 4 -4 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 (North of Shelton) Shoulder Travel Travei Travel Travel Shodlder rye — rat@ arte Tar e ?median _ m mrtmle tr sip � Segment 1 - Section D SR 3 — Shelton eastern City Limits to Mason Lake Road Conceptual Design March 2012 -Final 68 Bremerton Economic Development Study What Is the vision for Segment 2? / L- Allyn Through Segment 2, the long -range vision includes safety and mobility improvements developed for SR 3, depending on area icon county Pk Rd 3 development, traffic needs, and the rural nature of the segment 01 Section A SR 3 from Mason Lake Road to Pickering Road — ,,,, A* R d �0 a The vision for this section includes • Four -lane highway with eight -foot outside shoulders and Shelton Q4 rumble strips • Improve intersections as warranted with roundabouts, signals, and /or added channelization • Provide intersection spacing in accordance with WSDOT's access management requirements and limit driveways to right- in/right -out • Provide a two -foot centerline median with rumble strip Exhibit 4 -5 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 (Mason Lake Road to Pickering Road) Shedd Travel Travel Travel Shoulder Lane Lane Lane Lane 2 medlan wa iumbla" Segment 2 - Section A Conceptual Design March 2012 - Final 69 Bremerton Economic Development Study Section B SR 3 from Pickering Road to the north intersection of Grapeview Loop Road — This vision includes • Maintain a two -lane highway with twelve -foot lanes and eight -foot outside shoulders with rumble strips • Improve intersections as warranted with roundabouts, signals, and/ or added channelization • Upgrade bridges as necessary to meet new roadway configurations • Provide intersection spacing in accordance with WSDOT's access management requirements • Provide a two -foot centerline median with rumble strip • Provide passing lanes as warranted to maintain traffic flow by allowing safe passing of slower moving vehicles Exhibit 4 -6 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 (Pickering Road to Grapeview Loop Road) ShmAder Travel Travel Shoulder Lane n _ 00 0 7 ned&m wO wide strip Segment 2 - Section B Conceptual Design March 2012 -Final 70 Bremerton Economic Development Study What is the vision for Segment 3? The vision for Segment 3 through the Allyn and Belfair Belfair, area, included safety and mobility improvements developed �` 16 in accordance with community involvement and planned ` I Kitsap county improvements from the Belfair Bypass Study and the SR 3p `— !� Belfair Area Widening and Safety Improvements Project Allyn pfd Section A SR 3 from Grapeview Loop Road to North Bay Road 3 (Downtown Allyn Area) — The vision for this section includes Mason county • An urban two -lane highway section with a five -foot shoulder, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks • A landscaping area may be added where there is sufficient right -of -way and land owners agree to maintain it Traffic forecasts for the Allyn area indicate the long -term need for a four -lane facility through the community However, a four -lane highway is inconsistent with the community context and the Allyn Community Association expressed a preference to pursue a long- term, through traffic by -pass rather than expanding the current roadway to four lanes through Allyn Further study is needed to determine the most appropriate alternate route Exhibit 4 -7 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 (Downtown Allyn Area) Sidewalk Sidewalk Landscape shoulder Shout Q Landscape Travel Tr avel � Lane Lam t Segment 3 - Section A Conceptual Design With Optional Landscaping Area March 2012 - Final 71 Bremerton Economic Dev Study Section B SR 3 from North Bay Road to Belfair & south of Allyn - The vision for this section includes • Maintain a two -lane highway with twelve -foot lanes and eight -foot outside shoulders with rumble strips • Improve intersections as warranted with additional channelization • Provide intersection spacing in accordance with WSDOT's access management requirements and limit driveways to right -in/right -out • Provide a two -foot centerline median with rumble strip Exhibit 4 -8 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 (Allyn to Belfair & south of Allyn) Shoulder Travel Travel Shoulder Lane Lane 2 medw with rumble amp Segment 3 - Section B SR 3 — Allyn to Belfair Conceptual Design March 2012 -Final 72 Bremerton Economic Development Study Section C SR 3 through Belfair - Planned improvements from the SR 3 Belfair Area Widening and Safety Improvements Project were used to develop the vision for this section • A two -lane highway with an improved, two -way, left -turn lane and revised access points to reduce congestion and provide more efficient traffic movement • Improve bicycle and pedestrian safety by adding a bicycle lane and sidewalks • Add street lighting throughout the section • New stormwater treatment facilities are proposed to reduce pollutants in highway run -off Exhibit 4 -9 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 (Belfair Area) &* Me- ear Travel 1Mo YL tab TAI &1<e swam LM UM LM lane Um Segment 3 - Section C Conceptual Design WSDOT — SR 3 Belfair Widening & Safety Project March 2012 - Final 73 Br E D S Section D SR 3 — Belfair Bypass - Planned improvements from the Belfair Bypass Study were used to develop this vision, which includes • A four -lane, divided, limited access bypass around the Belfair area with standard shoulders • Initially construct as a two -lane highway • Controlled Intersections as warranted based on access management requirements • New stormwater treatment facilities Exhibit 4 -10 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 (Belfair Bypass) kt Shoulder Travel Travel Median Median Travel Travel Shoulder h ^=: Jr tane Segment 3 - Section D Belfair Bypass Conceptual Design WSDOT — Belfair Bypass Project March 2012 -Final 74 Bremerton Economic Development Study What is the vision for Segment 4? 3 Through Segment 4, the long -range vision includes safety and mobility improvements developed separately for SR 16 and ; Br @tiael to g , SR 3, and varying by access control and location Section A SR 3 from Belfair area to Gorst - The vision for this GOrst 16 section includes LM FWreFW &ftwkk Rd • From Belfair to Gorst, widen SR 3 to a four -lane, divided Beffidi �g highway with full inside and outside shoulders and rumble strips • Improve intersections as warranted with roundabouts, signals, and /or added channelization • Provide intersection spacing in accordance with WSDOT's access management requirements and limit driveways to right in/right -out (U -turn locations will be provided) Exhibit 4 -11 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 (Belfair to Gorst) 'S 7 Shoulder k Travel Travel Medan Median Travel Travel Shoulder La ne ne Lane Segment 4 - Section A Conceptual Design March 2012 - Final 75 Bremerton Economic Development Study Sections B & C SR 3 from Gorst to Loxie Eagans Boulevard Interchange and SR 16 from Gorst to Sedgwick Road Interchange - The vision for this section includes • A six -lane, divided, limited access highway, including High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes and full inside and outside shoulders with rumble strips • Access will mainly be from interchange locations (other local street and driveway access will be limited to right- in/right -out only) Exhibit 4 -12 Typical Cross Section - SR 3 & SR 16 (SR 3 - Gorst to SR 304 & SR16 - Gorst to SR 160) NOV HOV Shoulder Travel Travel Travel Travel Lane Median Median Lane Shoulder ane ane Lane ane a _g i Segment 4 - Sections B & C Conceptual Design March 2012 -Final 76 Bremerton Economic Development Study Section D SR 3 & SR 16 through the Gorst Area - A preliminary concept for the Gorst area improvements for the vision for this area includes • Provide a new interchange at the SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road intersection via a four -lane bridge with shoulders extended over Sam Christopherson Road and the SR 16 ramps • Improve SR 3 ramp terminal intersections with Sam Christopherson Road with new signals and channelization or roundabout • Provide for continuous HOV lanes from SR 3 to SR 16 • Widen SR 3 and SR 16 ramps to accommodate traffic flows • Limit access from local streets to right-in/right-out only 3 01 m Exhibit 4 -13 �F Conceptual Layout — SR 3 & SR 16 m �o / ( Gorst Area) i t / , 1a Sam Christopherson Road m / O March 2012 - Final 77 This page intentional) left blank Brem Econ Development Study Chapter 5 - Recommended Improvements How were the potential Improvements identified? This chapter discusses Together with input from the public collected as part of the the methodology and public outreach activities, the stakeholders and project team used process for Identifying the information and data presented in the first three chapters of and evaluating potential this corridor plan to identify the proposed mobility and safety Improvement projects improvements outlined in Chapter 4 Based on the stakeholders' The bottlenecks, safety concerns, and roadway conditions were first review of these projects, reviewed on a segment basis Improvements were developed to address the recommended each specific need Improvement projects and their priority are Once a total list of improvements was developed by segment, the list summarized was reviewed to determine if there was proper transition between improvements The various improvements were then adjusted to ensure compatibility with adjacent improvements How were the potential improvements evaluated? The evaluation methodology for BEDS was designed to provide an unbiased rating for each proposed project to assist in prioritizing the improvements for implementation as funds become available The methodology and criteria were presented to the stakeholders at their March 18, 2009 meeting After some discussion, the stakeholders agreed upon the methodology, criteria, and the points allocated to each category The methodology is based upon the evaluation criteria used in state, regional, county, and local grant decision processes These criteria include the following categories • Safety • Constructability • Congestion/Mobility • Environmental Impact • Community Issues March 2012 - Final 79 Bremerton Economic Development Study Specific evaluation criteria were developed for each category, based on available data, knowledge of the area, and grant programs The criteria are listed below by category • Safety o Five -Year Period of Total Collisions • Five -Year Period of Total Injury Collisions • Five -Year Period of Total Fatality Collisions • Constructabihty 0 2008 Planning Level Cost Estimate o Benefit/Cost Ratio o Right -of -Way (ROW) Needed • Congestion /Mobility 0 70% of posted speed limit for segments o LOS E for intersections o Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 0 2020 Level -of- Service without improvement o Non - Motorized Benefit • Environmental Impact • Wetlands • Cultural Sites • Endangered Species Impacts • Unsafe Soils or Slopes • Community Issues • Job Creation or Preservation • Community Support • Local Comprehensive Plan Consistency Based on discussions with the stakeholders, it was agreed that the project team would enter the data for all the categories except "Community Issues," which was the responsibility of the stakeholders to complete It was also agreed that there would be one score from each stakeholder agency March 2012 -Final 80 Bremerton Economic Development Study After the "Community Issues" category was completed by the stakeholders and submitted to the project team, the project team entered scores into a combined scoring sheet for final tabulation These final scores were sent to the stakeholders before their April 29, 2009 meeting This information was used to guide the discussion of project prioritization A preliminary set of maximum points available for each category, as well as the scoring method for each criterion is summarized on the following pages The stakeholders reviewed and approved the categories and criteria, maximum point, and scoring process before it was applied to the project EVALUATION CRITERIA & SCORING SUMMARY Safety (Maximum Points — 20) Calculated - Rate per million vehicles miles traveled compared to 2007 WSDOT Olympic Region average rate for similar class of highway (Rural Principal Arterial — Olympic Region) - Collision Rate 1 15 - Injury Collision 039 - Fatality Collision 220 • Five -Year Average Rate - Total Collisions • Five -Year Average Rate — Injury Collisions • Five -Year Average Rate - Fatality Collisions Safety Scoring 5 = > twice average 4 = 10% more to twice average 3 = around average rate 2 = 50% to 90% of average 1 = 1 % to 50% of average 0 = < 1 % of average March 2012 - Final 81 Bremerton Economic Development Study Constructabdity (Maximum Points — 15) • 2008 Planning Level Cost Estimate • Benefit /Cost Ratio — Based on WSDOT planning level benefit cost analysis • ROW Needed - Based on rough planning estimate 2008 Cost Scoring Benefit Cost Scoring Right of Way Scoring 5 = Tier 1 - <$5M 5 = >25 5= <05acre 4= Tier 2- $5Mto$15M 4= 11to25 4= 05tolacre 3 = Tier 2 - $15M to $25M 3= 09to11 3= 1to2acres 2 = Tier 3 - $25M to $40M 2= 06to09 2= 2to3acres 1= Tier 3- >$40M 1 =< 0 6 1= 3 to 4 acres 0 = > 4 acres Congeshon/Mobdity (Maximum Points - 40) • ADT (PM peak hour volumes times 10) • 2020 Level -of- Service without improvement (Based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual analysis procedures) • Non - Motorized Benefit ADT Scoring Level -of- Service (LOS) Non - Motorized Scoring 5 = > 60 000 Scoring 5 = dedicated non - motorized 4 = 40,000 to 60 000 5 = LOS >F- facility 3 = 25 000 to 40 000 4 = LOS F- 3 = shared use facility 2 = 10 000 to 25,000 3 = LOS F minimum (shoulders /intersection) 1 = < 10,000 2 = LOS E 1 = little or no improvement 1 = LOS <D March 2012 - Final 82 Bremerton Economic Development Study Environmental Impact (Maximum Points - 10) Based on currently available plans from county wetland and sensitive designated areas, national wetland data, and wildlife areas • Wetland Impacts • Cultural Site Impacts • Species Impacts • Unsafe Soils or Slopes Environmental Scoring 5 = little or no adverse impact potential 3 = moderate adverse impact potential 1 = high adverse impact potential Commumty Issues (Maximum Points — 15) • Job Creation or Preservation (qualitative evaluation based on personal knowledge) • Community Support (qualitative evaluation based on personal knowledge) • Local Comprehensive Plan Consistency (based on project consistency with current state, regional, and local agency plans) Job Creation & Community Support Scoring 5 = high potential 3 = moderate potential 1 = low potential Plan Consistency Scoring 5 = consistent with state, regional, and local plans 3 = consistent with two of the three plans 1 = consistent with one plan 0 = not included in any current plans March 2012 - Final 83 Bremerton Economic Development Study What are the evaluation results? Using the safety information, the 2020 traffic volumes, level -of- service analysis, conceptual level cost estimates, benefit /cost analysis, right -of- way, and environmental impacts associated with each of the potential improvements along the corridor, the project team scored the safety, constructability, congestion /mobility, and environmental categories The stakeholders evaluated the community issues category, using their knowledge of the area, project benefits, and public comments The project list and final scores are presented in Exhibit 5 -1 These scores ranged from a high of 75 points out of a possible 100 points for two projects to a low of 46 points The two highest scoring projects included • Project 20 - Intersection improvement at the SR 3 /Imperial Way intersection near the Bremerton National Airport • Project 33 - Non - motorized improvements along SR 3 in Belfair that connects to the funded Belfair widening project March 2012 -Final 84 Br emerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -1 Summary of Project Evaluation Scoring Proposed Project Location Project Issues Category Scores Project From To Problems / Bottlenecks / Congestion / Safety Construct- Congestion/ Environ- Community Number Description of improvement Milepost Milepost Delays ability Mobility mental Issues Total Score 20 points 15 points 40 points 10 points 15 points US 101 Widening - Widen to 4 -lanes from Wallace Kneeland Rural congestion travel speed 1 Blvd to Shelton Matlock Rd 34540 34711 will be less than 70% of posted 12 3 16 10 15 59 improvements for Matlock Rd interchange limited access speed by 2020 freeway section US 101 Widening - Widen to Rural congestion travel speed 2 4 -lanes from Shelton Matlock Rd 34711 34916 will be less than 70% of posted 13 2 16 9 15 57 to SR 3 limited access freeway speed by 2020 section US 101 /SR 102 - Intersection Extensive delay (average 473 improvements, Install roundabout sec) on SR 102 at the intersection 3 or traffic signal, based on detailed 34344 34344 with 912 -ft queue in 2020 (total 12 11 24 10 12 69 traffic study and warrants intersection approach volume = 1 535 in peak hour) US 101 SB Ramps/Wallace Average intersection delay = Kneeland Blvd - Intersection 116 sec (WB delay 211 sec) in 4 improvements install roundabout 34512 34512 2020 (total intersection approach 5 11 21 10 12 60 or traffic signal based on detailed volume = 1 505 in peak hour) traffic study and warrants Ramp queue length and delay US 101 NB Ramps/Wallace exceed analysis limitations Kneeland Blvd - Intersection Expect ramp backups onto 5 improvements install traffic signal 34512 34512 mainline US 101 delaying all 3 15 29 10 15 72 or roundabout, based on detailed northbound traffic in 2020 (total traffic study and warrants intersection approach volume = 2,500 in peak hour) March 2012 - Final 85 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -1 Summary of Project Evaluation Scoring - Continued Proposed Project - Locabon Project Issues Category Scores Project From To Problems / Bottlenecks / Congestion / Safety Construct- Congestion/ Environ- Community Number Description of Improvement Milepost Milepost Delays ability Mobility mental Issues Total Score 20 points 15 points 40 points 10 points 15 points US 101 SB Ramps /Shelton - Matlock Road - Intersection SB Off -Ramp delay = 36 sec improvements, Install new SB 34682 34682 for 87 vehicles in 2020 (total 5 15 19 10 13 62 6 off ramp, install traffic signal or intersection approach volume = roundabout, based on detailed 1,100 in peak hour) traffic study and warrants US 101 NB Ramps /Shelton NB Off -Ramp left turn delay = - Matlock Road - Intersection 739 sec for 324 vehicles in 2020 7 improvements install roundabout 34628 34682 with a queue length of 630 feet 4 15 27 10 11 67 or traffic signal based on detailed (total intersection approach traffic study and warrants volume = 1 344 in peak hour) Johns Prairie EB approach SR 3 /Johns Prairie Road - delay = 736 sec with 870 -foot Intersection improvements queue length and 362 vehicles S including relocating intersection 657 657 in 2020 safety issues, geometric 13 8 27 9 12 69 to the south improve intersection issues for turning movements, angle and add in new roadway link natural feature limitations (total intersection approach volume = 1 700 in peak hour) Mason Lake Rd SB approach SR 3 /Mason Lake Road - delay = 271 sec with 189 vehicles Intersection improvements install (including 251 -foot queue 9 roundabout or traffic signal based 724 724 length and 557 sec delay for left 13 10 24 9 11 67 on detailed traffic study and turns) in 2020 (total intersection warrants approach volume = 1 800 in peak hour) March 2012 - Final 86 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -1 Summary of Project Evaluation Scoring - Continued Proposed Project location Project Issues Category Scores Project From To Problems / Bottlenecks / Congestion / Safety Construct- Congestion/ Environ- Community Number Description of Improvement Milepost Milepost Delays ability Mobility mental Issues Total Score 20 points 15 points 40 points 10 points 15 points SR 3 /Cranberry Creek East Cranberry Creek Rd SB Road - (Interim) Intersection approach delay = 158 sec for 26 10 improvements install roundabout 876 876 vehicles, NB approach delay = 5 14 24 10 9 62 or traffic signal based on detailed 157 sec for 7 vehicles in 2020 traffic study and warrants (total intersection approach volume = 1 828 in peak hour) SR 3 /Agate Road — (Interim) East Agate Rd NB approach Intersection improvements, install delay = 602 sec with 551 feet 11 roundabout or traffic signal based 899 899 queues for 231 vehicles in 2020 7 11 27 10 13 67 on detailed traffic study and (total intersection approach warrants volume = 1,860 in peak hour) New County Road & Improved SR 3 Intersection - (Long -term) Install new county connector roadways to combine traffic from Cranberry Creek Rd, Deer Extensive delays on the side Creek Rd, and Agate Rd install 12 roundabout or traffic signal 876 899 streets, intersection spacing too 11 9 27 9 10 65 at common point for traffic close to meet recommended movements with SR 3, limit access spacing at other locations to right- in/right- out (This project replaces SR 3/ Agate Rd and SR 3 /Cranberry Creek Rd projects) SR 3 /Pickenng Road - East Pickering Rd NB approach Intersection improvements, install delay = 317 sec with 400 feet 13 roundabout or traffic signal based 1076 1076 queues for 222 vehicles in 2020 13 11 24 10 12 70 on detailed traffic study and (total peak hour approach warrants volume = 1,500) March 2012 - Final 87 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -1 Summary of Project Evaluation Scoring - Continued Proposed Project Location Project Issues Category Scores e t y Construct - Congestion/ Environ- Community Project Description of Improvement From To Problems /Bottlenecks /Congestion / ability Mobility mental Issues Total Score Number Milepost Milepost Delays 20 points 15 points 40 points 10 points 15 points SR 3 Safety Improvements - Widen shoulders from Pickering Rd Lack of shoulders vehicle to Grapeview Loop Rd install SB and pedestrian access issues 14 left -turn lane at South Grapeview 1076 2032 emergency vehicle access during 11 2 16 7 10 46 Loop Rd install NB right -turn lane incident at North Grapeview Loop Rd add passing lanes E Grapeview Loop Rd EB SR 3 /Grapeview Loop Road approach delay = 141 sec with (north intersection) - Intersection 85 feet queues for 29 vehicles in 15 improvements, install roundabout 2032 2032 2020, WB approach delay = 33 13 11 21 8 10 64 or traffic signal, based on detailed sec with 64 feet queues for 110 traffic study and warrants vehicles in 2020 (total peak hour approach volume = 1,300) SR 3 Safety Improvements - Lack of non - motorized facilities 16 Standardizing shoulders from 2032 2048 vehicle and pedestrian access 13 11 16 8 10 58 Grapeview Loop Rd to Sherwood issues emergency vehicle Creek Rd access during incident SR 3 Allyn Non - motorized _ Improvements - Install sidewalks 17 2048 21 17 Lack of non - motorized facilities 11 8 21 9 15 64 curbs gutters within Allyn business _ zone East Lakeland Dr EB approach SR 3/1-akeland Dnve /Evans Street - delay = 263 sec with 218 feet Intersection improvements install queues for 97 vehicles in 2020, 18 traffic signal based on detailed 2093 2093 Evans St WB approach delay 13 11 24 10 15 73 traffic study and warrants = 42 sec for 7 vehicles in 2020 (total approach volume = 1 570 in peak hour) March 2012 - Final 88 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -1 Summary of Project Evaluation Scoring - Continued Proposed Project Location Project Issues Category Scores Project From To Problems / Bottlenecks / Congestion / Safety Construct- Congestion/ Environ- Community Number Description of improvement Milepost Milepost Delays ability Mobility mental Issues Total Score 20 points 15 points 40 points 10 points 15 points SR 3 /North Bay Road - East North Bay Dr WB approach Intersection improvements install delay = 205 sec with 316 feet 19 roundabout or traffic signal, based 21 24 21 24 queues for 210 vehicles in 2020 13 13 24 10 14 74 on detailed traffic study and wye intersection (total approach warrants volume = 1 490 in peak hour) Extensive Delay at the SR 3 /Imperial Way - Intersection intersection average delay = 413 20 improvements by adding additional 30 51 3051 sec with intersection v/c ratio = 13 15 24 10 13 75 channelization improvements 2 7 (total peak hour approach volume = 3,265) SR 3 Widening - Widen to 4 lanes Exceed maximum throughput in 21 from Imperial Way to Sunnyslope 3051 3260 2020 travel speed will be less 9 7 29 9 11 66 Rd than 70% of posted speed by 2020 22 SR 3 Widening - Widen to 4 lanes 3260 3418 High traffic volumes on a 2/3 lane 12 7 24 9 12 64 from Sunnyslope Rd to Gorst facility cause congestion SR 3 /Sunnyslope Road - Sunnyslope Rd queue length and Intersection improvements install delay exceed analysis limitations 23 roundabout or traffic signal, based 3260 3260 in 2020 WB left turn on SR 3 12 15 24 10 10 71 on detailed traffic study and delay = 68 sec with 142 -foot warrants queues (total peak hour approach volume = 3,560) SR 3 Widening - Eliminate lane drop on SR 16 to northbound SR Various lane drops and the 24 3 by extending the lane north of 3481 3504 merging leads to congestion 8 5 27 8 13 61 the railroad bridge and extend the ( Gorst area interim improvement) northbound SR 3 lane for longer merge area (interim) March 2012 - Final 89 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -1 Summary of Project Evaluation Scoring - Continued Proposed Project Location Project Issues Category Scores Project From To Problems / Bottlenecks / Congestion / Safety Construct- Congestion/ Environ- Community Number Description of Improvement Milepost Milepost Delays ability Mobility mental Issues Total Score 20 points 15 points 40 points 10 points 15 points SR 3 Widening - Widen to 6 lanes Exceed maximum throughput by 25 (creating one HOV lane in each 3426 3659 2020 travel speed will be less 5 6 27 7 12 57 direction) from Gorst to SR 304 than 70% of posted speed by 2020 ( Gorst area improvement) SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road - 2008 Level of Service of E 2020 (Interim Intersection Improvements average intersection delay = 428 to meet 2008 demand) sec with v/c ratio = 2 12 and 26 Intersection improvements - 3426 3426 queues ranging from 162 feet 5 15 29 10 10 70 provide channelization or signal to 3 670 feet (total intersection modifications or replace with a approach volume = 3 970 in roundabout based on detailed peak hour) ( Gorst area interim safety and traffic warrant analysis improvement) LOS F by 2020 with interim SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road improvements, 2020 average - 2020 Intersection improvements intersection delay = 428 sec 27 - provide channelization or signal 3426 3426 with v/c ratio = 2 12 and queues 5 14 29 10 12 71 modifications or replace with a ranging from 162 feet to 3 670 roundabout based on detailed feet (total intersection approach safety and traffic warrant analysis volume = 3 970 in peak hour) ( Gorst area interim improvement) NB ramp average intersection - SR 16 Ramps /Sedgwick Road - delay = 93 sec with v/c ratio = 28 Widen Sedgwick Rd to 4 lanes 2514 2514 1 44 queue > 620 feet and cross 9 7 24 9 13 62 plus turn lanes street queues > 1,393 ft SB ramp average delay = 108 sec with queues of 142 to >967 ft SR 16 Ramps/Tremont Street - NB off ramp average delay 2,306 29 Widen Tremont St to 4 lanes install 2669 2669 sec with backup onto SR 16, SB 4 9 29 9 14 65 new signals at both NB and SB off ramp average delay = 673 ramp interchanges with queues of 2,107 ft March 2012 - Final 90 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -1 Summary of Project Evaluation Scoring - Continued Proposed Project Location Project Issues Category Scores Project From To Problems / Bottlenecks / Congestion / Safety Construct- Congestion/ Environ- Community Number Description of Improvement Milepost Milepost Delays ability Mobility mental Issues Total Score 20 points 15 points 40 points 10 points 15 points SR 16 Widening - Widen to 6 -lanes (creating one HOV lane in 50% of posted speed in 2020 30 each direction) from SR 160 to SR 2514 2905 (part of Gorst area improvement) 7 5 27 7 11 56 166 and re -strip from SR 166 to Gorst Belfair Bypass - Construct an Ramp queue length and delay alternate 2 -lane divided highway exceed analysis limitations, around Belfair to be eventually Expect ramp backups onto 31 widened to 4 -lanes with full limited 2326 2878 main line US 101 delaying all 13 5 21 7 15 62 access control access points will northbound traffic in 2020 (total be located at about 1 mile intervals intersection approach volume = 2 500 in peak hour) Belfair Area Safety & Widening SB Off -Ramp delay = 36 sec Improvements - Widen existing for 87 vehicles in 2020 (total 32 2 -lane roadway to add two -way left 24 91 2634 intersection approach volume = 13 6 27 9 15 70 turn lane (TWLTI-) with a bike lane 1 100 in peak hour) and sidewalk in each direction SR 3 Belfair Additional Non - NB Off -Ramp left turn delay Motorized Improvements - Widen = 739 sec for 324 vehicles in 33 exiting 2 -lane roadway to include 2634 2798 2020 with a queue length of 630 13 10 27 10 15 75 a bike lane and sidewalk in each feet (total peak hour approach direction volume = 1 344) Extend SB SR 3 Through SR 304 Interchange - Extend SB Traffic congestion at bottle neck 35A SR 3 two -lanes though SR 304 3585 3675 where SR 3 narrows to one lane 9 9 21 9 15 64 Interchanges and adjust SR 304 southbound SB ramp to merge instead of add lane 35 Revise SR 3 /SR 304 Interchanges 3585 3675 Exceeds highway capacity 9 4 21 9 15 59 to allow for HOV lanes March 2012 - Final 91 Bremerton Economic Development Study How were the improvements prioritized? The project information including safety, traffic, congestion, costs and other impacts, as well as the evaluation scoring results and public comments from the outreach activities were presented to the stakeholders at their April 29, 2009 meeting After a lengthy discussion about the pros and cons of the alternatives, scoring criteria, and public comments, the stakeholders decided that highest priority should focus on improvements to three mayor safety and bottleneck locations, as identified through the public outreach activities and interviews with stakeholder agencies These three locations include the Belfair area, the Gorst area, and the SR 3 /Johns Prairie Road intersection The stakeholders believed that improvements to these three locations would benefit overall traffic operations and encourage econormc activity along the corridor The three projects noted above are generally the most constrained and consequently more expensive, which resulted in lower evaluation scores However, the stakeholders agreed that if sufficient funds are available, these projects should be considered first If funding is not sufficient for these improvements then lower cost improvements on the priontized lists should receive any available funding The stakeholders then decided that the prioritization of the remaining projects would follow the evaluation scores, based on safety, constructability, congestion, environmental overview, and community issues March 2012 -Final 92 Bremerton Economic Development Study What are the recommended 2020 improvements? The stakeholders reviewed the project list and identified the following projects as their top priorities • Project 31- Belfair Bypass — Construct an alternate 2 -lane divided highway around Belfair to be eventually widened to 4 lanes with full limited access control, access points will be located at approximately one -mile intervals • Project 8 - SR 3 /Johns Prairie Road — Relocate the intersection to the south to improve the intersection angle and add a new roadway link Gorst Area Improvements - Widen all roadways through the Gorst area to six lanes with HOV lanes, grade separate Sam Christopherson Road/SR 3 intersection, and widen SR 3 and SR 16 ramps to accommodate future traffic flows This vision would include the following improvements • Project 26 - SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road — (to meet existing demand) provide intersection improvements such as re- channelization and signal modifications or replace with roundabout, based on detailed geometric, safety and traffic analyses of the intersection (interim) • Project 27 - SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road — (to meet projected 2020 demand) provide intersection improvements such as re- channelization, additional lanes, and signal modifications or replace with a roundabout, based on detailed geometric, safety and traffic analyses of the intersection (interim) • Project 24 - SR 3 Widening — Eliminate lane drop on SR 16 to northbound SR 3 by extending the lane north of the railroad bridge, rebuild the railroad bridge, and extend the northbound SR 3 lane for a longer merge area (interim) • Project 25 - SR 3 Widening — Widen to 6 lanes (creating one HOV lane in each direction) from Gorst to SR 304 and rebuild SR 304 /SR 3 interchange March 2012 - Final 93 Brem Economi D S • Project 30 - SR 16 Widening — Widen to 6 lanes by adding one HOV lane in each direction from SR 160 to SR 166 and re- stripe from SR 166 to Gorst • Project 34 - SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Interchange — Grade - separate the SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road intersection by building a new interchange • Project 35 - SR3 /SR304 Interchange — Rebuild the interchange to provide additional lanes along SR 3 • Project 36 - SR 3 Widening — Widen to 6 lanes by adding one HOV lane in each direction from SR 304 to Loxie Eagans Interchange and maintain the NB drop lane to off -ramp to Loxie Eagans Boulevard As noted under "What are the recommended improvements" page 4, the stakeholders recognized that the above projects would be costly and take time to implement With this recognition, the BEDS stakeholders also endorsed a list of projects that are less costly and would be potentially easier and quicker to construct This list of projects can be found in Exhibit 5 -2, below Depending upon economic conditions within the next five to ten years, it may be necessary to reevaluate and update the project list if future traffic conditions along the corridor evolve differently than anticipated in this study The complete list of improvement projects to meet 2020 needs by priority ranking is presented in Exhibit 5 -2 March 2012 -Final 94 B Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -2 Pnonty of Corridor Improvements 2008 Planning Proposed Project Location Project Issues Level Cost Estimate * Priority Project Description of Improvement From To Problems / Bottlenecks / ($ Millions) Ranking Number Milepost Milepost Congestion / Delays Belfair Bypass - Construct an alternate 2 -lane divided highway around the town of Belfair, this Existing travel speed is less $76m highway will be designed to than 70% of the posted (2007 $ from 1 31 4 -lanes with full limited access 2326 2878 speed, a large amount of Belfair Bypass controlled but initially built to through traffic on SR 3 Project) 2- lanes, access points will be travelling through a congested located at approximately 1 mile developing area intervals, R/W will be acquired for 4 -lane design Johns Prairie Rd EB approach SR 3 /Johns Prairie Road - delay = 736 sec with 870 -foot $20m Intersection improvements queue length and 362 vehicles (2009$ 2 8 - relocate intersection to the in 2020, safety issues from Mason south improve the intersection 6 57 6 57 geometric issues for turning County) angle, and add in new roadway movements, natural feature link limitations (total peak hour approach volume = 1 700) Congestion along all roadways 3 Gorst Area Improvements (includes the through Gorst area, travel following projects) speed less than 70% of posted speed Extend SB SR 3 Through SR 304 Interchange - Extend SB Traffic congestion at bottle 35A SR 3 two -lanes though SR 304 35 85 3675 neck where SR 3 narrows to $19m Interchanges and adjust SR 304 one lane southbound SB ramp to merge instead of add lane SR 3 /Sam Christopherson 3 Road — (Interim Intersection 2008 Level of Service of E, Improvements to meet 2020 average intersection 2008 demand) Intersection delay = 428 sec with We ratio 26 improvements — provide 3426 3426 = 2 12 and queues ranging $3m channelization or signal from 162 feet to 3,670 feet modifications or replace with a (total intersection approach roundabout, based on detailed volume = 3,970 in peak hour) safety and traffic warrant analysis The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level, and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 95 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -2 Priority of Corridor Improvements - Continued 2008 Planning Proposed Project Location Project Issues Level Cost Estimate * Priority Project Description of Improvement From To Problems / Bottlenecks ! ($ Millions) Ranking Number Milepost Milepost Congestion / Delays SR 3 /Sam Christopherson LOS F by 2020 with interim Road - 2020 Intersection improvements, 2020 average improvements - provide intersection delay = 428 sec 27 channelization or signal 3426 3426 with v/c ratio = 2 12 and $6m modifications or replace with a queues ranging from 162 feet roundabout based on detailed to 3,670 feet (total intersection safety and traffic warrant approach volume = 3 970 in analysis peak hour) SR 3 Widening - Eliminate lane drop on SR 16 to northbound SR 24 3 by extending the lane north of 3481 3505 Various lane drops and the $23m the railroad bridge and extend merging leads to congestion the northbound SR 3 lane for longer merge area (interim) SR 3 Widening - Widen to 6 Exceed maximum throughput 25 lanes (creating one HOV lane in 3426 3659 travel speed will be less than $258m each direction) from Gorst to SR 70% of posted speed by 2020 3 304 SR 16 Widening - Widen to 6 -lanes (creating one HOV lane Rural congestion travel speed 30 in each direction) from SR 160 to 2514 29 05 will be less than 70% of $145m SR 166 and re -strip from SR 166 posted speed by 2020 to Gorst SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Interchange - Construct a new 34 interchange to grade separating 3426 3467 Exceed maximum throughput $63m the SR 3 /Sam Christopherson by 2030 Road intersection and widen the SR 16 Spur 35 SR 3 /SR 304 Interchange - 3659 3660 Exceed maximum throughput $48m Reconstruct interchange SR 3 Widening - Widen to 6 lanes (creating one HOV lane in Exceed maximum throughput 36 each direction) from SR 304 to 3451 3731 by 2030, travel speed will $31 m Loxie Eagans Boulevard, and be less than 70% of posted maintain the northbound auxiliary speed by 2030 Pane The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 96 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -2 Priority of Corridor Improvements - Continued 2008 Planning Proposed Project Location Project Issues Level Cost Estimate * Priority Project Description of Improvement From To Problems / Bottlenecks / ($ Millions) Ranking Number Milepost Milepost Congestion / Delays Extensive delay at the SR 3 /Imperial Way - Intersection intersection average delay = 20 improvements add additional 3051 3051 413 sec with intersection v/c r $2m ratio = 2 7 (total intersection channelization improvements approach volume = 3,265 in peak hour) 4 SR 3 Belfair Additional Non - Motorized Improvements - Widen exiting 2 -lane roadway to Lack of non - motorized 33 include a bike lane and sidewalk 2634 2708 facilities in a developing area $3m in each direction with a closed drainage system from Old Belfair Highway to Belfair northern limit East North Bay Dr WB SR 3 /North Bay Road - approach delay = 205 sec Intersection improvements, with 316 feet queues for 5 19 install roundabout or traffic 2124 21 24 210 vehicles in 2020, wye $2m signal based on detailed traffic intersection (total intersection study and warrants approach volume = 1 490 in peak hour) East Lakeland Dr EB approach SR 3 /1-akeland Drive/ delay = 263 sec with 218 Evans Street - Intersection feet queues for 97 vehicles in 6 18 improvements install traffic 2093 2093 2020, Evans St WB approach $2m signal, based on detailed traffic delay = 42 sec for 7 vehicles study and warrants in 2020, (total intersection approach volume = 1,570 in peak hour) US 101 NB Ramps/Wallace Ramp queue length and delay Kneeland Boulevard - exceed analysis limitations, Intersection improvements, expect ramp backups onto 7 5 install traffic signal or 34512 34512 mainline US 101 delaying all $2m roundabout, based on detailed northbound traffic in 2020 traffic study and warrants (total intersection approach volume = 2,500 in peak hour) " The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including nght - of -way) rising matenal costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergroundmg of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 97 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -2 Priority of Corridor Improvements - Continued 2008 Planning Proposed Project Location Project Issues Level Cost Estimate * Priority Project Descnpbon of Improvement From To Problems / Bottlenecks / ($ Millions) Ranking Number Milepost Milepost Congestion / Delays Sunnyslope Rd queue length SR 3 /Sunnyslope Road - and delay exceed analysis Intersection improvements, limitations in 2020, WB left 8 23 install roundabout or traffic 32 60 3260 turn on SR 3 delay = 68 sec $2m signal, based on detailed traffic with 142 -foot queues (total study and warrants intersection approach volume = 3 560 in peak hour) SR 3 /Pickenng Road - East Pickering Rd NB Intersection improvements approach delay = 317 sec 9 13 install roundabout or traffic 1076 1076 with 400 feet queues for $2m signal based on detailed traffic 222 vehicles in 2020 (total study and warrants intersection approach volume = 1,500 in peak hour) US 101 /SR 102 - Intersection Extensive delays (average improvements, install 473 sec) on SR 102 at the 10 3 roundabout or traffic signal, 34344 34344 intersection with 912 -ft queue $2m based on detailed traffic study in 2020 (total intersection and warrants approach volume = 1,535 in peak hour) The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergroundrng of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 -Final 98 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -2 Priority of Corridor Improvements - Continued 2008 Planning Proposed Project Location Project Issues Level Cost Estimate * Priority Project Description of Improvement From To Problems / BotBenecks / ($ Millions) Ranking Number Milepost Milepost Congestion / Delays SR 3 /Agate Road - Intersection East Agate Rd NB approach improvements, install delay = 602 sec with 551 11 roundabout or traffic signal, 899 899 feet queues for 231 vehicles $2m based on detailed traffic study in 2020 (total intersection and warrants approach volume = 1,860 in peak hour) Mason Lake Rd SB approach SR 3 /Mason Lake Road - delay = 271 sec with 189 Intersection improvements, vehicles (including 251 -foot 11 9 install roundabout or traffic 724 724 queue length and 557 sec $2m signal, based on detailed traffic delay for left turns) in 2020 study and warrants (total intersection approach volume = 1,800 in peak hour) US 101 NB Ramps /Shelton - NB off -ramp left turn delay Matlock Road - Intersection = 739 sec for 324 vehicles 7 improvements, install 34682 34682 in 2020 with a queue length $2m roundabout or traffic signal of 630 feet (total intersection based on detailed traffic study approach volume = 1 344 in and warrants peak hour) SR 3 Widening - Widen to 4 Exceed maximum throughput 12 21 lanes from Imperial Way to 3051 3260 in 2020, travel speed will $57m Sunnyslope Rd be less than 70% of posted speed by 2020 The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders pnonhze projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way), nsing material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 99 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -2 Priority of Corridor Improvements - Continued 2008 Planning Proposed Project Location Project Issues Level Cost Estimate * Priority Project Description of Improvement From To Problems / Bottlenecks / ($ Millions) Ranking Number Milepost Milepost Congestion / Delays New County Road & Improved SR 3 Intersection - Install new county connector roadways to combine traffic from Cranberry Creek Rd Deer Creek Rd and Agate Rd, install roundabout or Extensive delays on the side 12 traffic signal at common point 876 899 streets $9m for traffic movements with SR 3 limit access at other locations 13 to right-in/right-out (This project replaces Project SR 3 /Agate Rd and SR 3 /Cranberry Creek Rd projects) SR 16 Ramps/Tremont Street - NB off -ramp average delay Widen Tremont St to 4 lanes, 2,306 sec with backup onto 29 install new signals at both NB 2669 2669 SR 16, SB off -ramp average $16m and SB ramp interchanges delay = 673 with queues of 2,107 feet East Grapeview Loop Rd EB SR 3 /Grapeview Loop Road approach delay = 141 sec with (north intersection) - Intersection 85 feet queues for 29 vehicles 15 improvements, install 2032 2032 in 2020 WB approach delay $2m roundabout or traffic signal = 33 sec with 64 feet queues based on detailed traffic study for 110 vehicles in 2020 (total and warrants peak hour approach volume = 14 1,300) SR 3 Allyn Non - Motorized 17 Improvements - Install 2048 21 17 Lack of non - motorized $8m sidewalks, curbs, and gutters facilities within Allyn business zone SR 3 Widening - Widen to 4 High traffic volumes on a 2/3 22 lanes from Sunnyslope Rd to 3260 3418 lane facility cause congestion $52m Gorst ' The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars, are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 -Final 100 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -2 Priority of Corridor Improvements - Continued 2008 Planning Proposed Project Location Project Issues Level Cost Estimate * Pnordy Project Description of improvement From To Problems / Bottlenecks ! ($ Millions) Ranking Number Milepost Milepost Congestion I Delays US 101 SB Ramps/Shelton - Matlock Road - Intersection SB off -ramp delay = 36 sec 6 improvements, install new SB 34682 34682 for 87 vehicles in 2020 (total $3m off -ramp, install traffic signal or intersection approach volume roundabout, based on detailed = 1,100 in peak hour) traffic study and warrants East Cranberry Creek Rd SB SR 3 /Cranberry Creek Road approach delay = 158 sec - Intersection improvements for 26 vehicles, NB approach 15 10 install roundabout or traffic 876 876 delay = 157 sec for 7 vehicles $2m signal, based on detailed traffic in 2020 (total intersection study and warrants approach volume = 1 828 in peak hour) NB ramp average intersection delay = 93 sec with v/c ratio SR 16 Ramps /Sedgwick = 1 44 queue > 620 feet and 28 Road - Widen Sedgwick Rd to 4 2514 2514 cross street queues > 1,393 ft, $16m lanes plus turn lanes SB ramp average delay = 108 sec with queues ranging from 142 ft to >967 feet US 101 SB Ramps/Wallace Kneeland Blvd - Intersection Average intersection delay = 116 sec (WB delay 211 sec) 16 4 improvements install 34512 34512 in 2020 (total intersection $2m roundabout or traffic signal, approach volume = 1,505 in based on detailed traffic study peak hour) and warrants US 101 Widening - Widen to 4 -lanes from Wallace Kneeland Rural congestion travel speed 17 1 Blvd to Shelton Matlock Rd, 3454 34711 will be less than 70% of $55m improvements for Matlock Rd posted speed by 2020 interchange, limited access - freeway section SR 3 Safety Improvements - Lack of non - motorized 18 16 Standardizing shoulders from 2032 2048 facilities, vehicle and $2m East Grapeview Loop Road to Sherwood Creek Road pedestrian access issues " The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 101 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -2 Priority of Corridor Improvements - Continued 2008 Planning Proposed Project Location Project Issues Level Cost Estimate * Priority Project Description of Improvement From To Problems / Bottlenecks / ($ Millions) Ranking Number Milepost Milepost Congestion / Delays US 101 Widening - Widen to 4 -lanes from Shelton Matlock Rd Rural congestion travel speed 19 2 to SR 3, improvements to the SR 34711 34916 will be less than 70% of $58m 3 interchange, limited access - posted speed by 2020 freeway section SR 3 Safety Improvements - Widen shoulders from Pickering Rd to Grapeview Loop Rd 20 14 install SB left -turn lane at South 1076 2032 Lack of shoulders vehicle and $72m Grapewew Loop Rd, install pedestrian access issues NB right -turn lane at North Grapewew Loop Rd, and add passing lanes, as warranted PROJECT PREVIOUSLY FUNDED Belfair Area Safety & Widening Improvements - Widen exiting Existing travel speed is less 2 -lane roadway to a 3 -lane than 70% of the posted roadway (including two -way speed, left- turning traffic 32 left turn lane (TWLTL)) with a 2491 2634 slowing travel speed through $19m bike lane and sidewalk in each the Belfair area, lack of direction with a closed drainage non - motonzed facilities in a system from SR 106 to Old developing area Belfair Hwy The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (Including right -of -way) nsIng material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergroundIng of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 -Final 102 Bremerton Economic Devel Study Are there other associated recommendations? As part of the BEDS process, other transportation modes and facility improvements were discussed and reviewed Based on this review, the following additional transportation improvement projects are supported by the stakeholders • Expanded park & ride facilities, especially in the SKIA area, are needed to encourage transit and carpools and reduce traffic along the corridor • Expanded transit service is also recommended as the SKIA industrial area grows and develops • Encourage local agencies to develop off - roadway trails, such as the Sinclair Inlet Trail Project, to provide alternative routes for pedestrians and bicyclists and avoid conflicts with vehicular traffic through heavily congested areas In addition to these improvements, another recommendation is to add an Active Traffic Management (ATM) system for the Gorst area An ATM system represents a wide range of technologies and strategies that may be used to optimize traffic operations during periods of peak travel demand or when incidents and events occur that affect traffic operations and safety An ATM system can be a highly cost - effective strategy to improve the efficiency and safety of the state highways in the Gorst area An ATM system may include • Variable Speed Limit Signs These are electronic speed limit signs that would enable WSDOT to temporarily reduce the speed of traffic on SR 16 and SR 3 during congested periods or when incidents occur that create unsafe conditions The benefit of these signs would be to improve safety and maximize vehicle throughput during congested periods or when incidents occur • Advanced Traveler Information Signs These are electronic variable message signs that provide travelers with information regarding travel conditions ahead The safety benefit of these signs are that they warn travelers of conditions ahead, such as congestion ahead, lane blockages or incidents, while enabling travelers to choose alternate routes to avoid the incidents or delays March 2012 - Final 103 Bremerton Economic Development Study • Ramp Metering Ramp metering of the on -ramps can be an effective way to manage mainline congestion and improve safety during periods of peak travel demand Ramp metering would control the quantity and frequency of traffic merging onto the state highways during congested periods Ramp meters help reduce severe bottlenecks that form where on -ramps merge onto limited access state highways during congested periods, and maximize the number of vehicles that the state highways can handle without inducing gridlock Managing the volume of traffic entering a limited access state highway improves safety by reducing the frequency of merge - related collisions Ramp metering can also provide opportunities for transit and HOV bypass lanes on the on -ramps However, ramp metering could degrade mobility on the local street system unless sufficient ramp meter storage space is provided on the ramps The effects of implementing ramp metering without adding sufficient ramp storage can be long traffic queues on the local street system potentially resulting in the diversion of trips to other routes The lack of available storage space on the existing ramps in the study area should be a primary consideration if ramp metering is implemented To avoid local roadway queuing problems, a significant rebuild and lengthening of the on -ramps would be required These technologies would be used to improve the efficiency of SR 16 and SR 3 and provide travelers with real -tune information about roadway conditions, congestion, and incidents so they can make better decisions about how and when to use these highways and when to use alternate routes or other modes of travel March 2012 -Final 104 i Bremerton Economic Developm S How will the improvements be implemented? Overall, the BEDS Plan identified 36 projects needed to meet the corridor vision and 2020 needs Of these projects, only one is partially funded With the current recession, the available revenue needed to implement these improvements is very limited and cannot fund all of the projects in the near term To assist with the implementation of the improvements, an action matrix was developed based on the guidelines outlined in WSDOT's 2007 Planning Studies Guidelines and Criteria Report This action matrix, as presented in Exhibit 5 -3, lists the project by their priority and classifies them in terms of the Washington Transportation Guidelines and the Highway System Plan implementation strategies March 2012 - Final 105 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix WTP Investment Guideline HSP Esbmated Costs Implementation State P =Preservabon 1 = Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route / Funding responsible Partners/ Ranking Project Recommendation # Source Programmed for securing Resources Number S =Safety 2 = Tier 2 ($- millions) (Biennium) funding EV =Eton Vitality M =Mobility 3 =Tier 3 EQ =Environ Quai Belfair Bypass - Construct an alternate 2 -lane divided highway $76m around the town of Belfair this (2007 $ from highway will be designed to 4 -lanes Belfair Bypass Mason 1 SR 3/31 with full limited access controlled S /M /EV 3 Project) TBD TBD TBD County but initially built to 2 -lanes access points will be located at approximately 1 mile intervals, R/W will be acquired for 4 -lane design SR 3 /Johns Prairie Road $20m - Intersection improvements - (2009$ 2 SR 3/8 relocate intersection to the south S 1 County) from Mason TBD TBD Mason WSDOT, County Shelton improve the intersection angle, and add in new roadway link The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders priontize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including nght -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 106 Brem Econ D S tudy Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WiP Investment Guideline HSP Estimated Costs Implementation State P= Preservation 1 =Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route/ Funding responsible Partners/ Ranking Project Recommendation Source Programmed for securing Resources S= Safety 2 =Tier 2 ($- millions) * (Biennium) Number EV =Econ Vitality funding M =Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ= Envtron Qual 3 Gorst Area Improvements (includes the S/M/EV following projects) Extend SB SR 3 Through SR 304 WSDOT SR Interchange - Extend SB SR 3 two- Kitsap Port of 3/35A lanes though SR 304 Interchanges S/M 1 $19m TBD TBD County, Bremerton and adjust SR 304 SB ramp to Bremerton Kitsap merge instead of add lane Transit SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road - (Interim Intersection Improvements WSDOT to meet 2008 demand) Intersection improvements - Kitsap Port of 3 SR 3/26 provide Lion improvements n or signal S/M 1 $3m TBD TBD County Bremerton Bremerton Kitsap modifications or replace with a Transit roundabout based on detailed safety and traff ic warrant analysis SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road - 2020 Intersection improvements WSDOT of SR 3/27 - provide channelization or signal m Kitsap Port rtt modifications or replace with a S/M 1 $6 TBD TBD County, Bremerton, roundabout based on detailed Bremerton Kitsap safety and traffic warrant analysis Transit nsit t The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality Is difficult to estimate without more design and maybe higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 107 Bremerton Economic Development S tudy Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WTP Investment Guideline HSP Estimated Costs Implementation State P =Preservation 1 = Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route/ Recommendation Funding programmed responsible Partners/ Ranking Project Source for securing Resources Number S =Safety 2 = Tier 2 ($- millions) (Biennium) funding EV =Econ Vitality - M =Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ =Environ Quai SR 3 Widening - Eliminate lane drop on SR 16 to northbound SR WSDOT Kitsap Port of 3 by extending the lane north of SR 3/24 the railroad bridge and extend the S /M /E:V 2 $23m TBD TBD County, Bremerton, Bremerton Kitsap northbound SR 3 lane for longer merge area (interim) Transit The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders pnontize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are panning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergroundmg of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 108 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WTP Investment Guideline HSP Estimated Costs Implementation State P= Preservation 1 = Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route! Recommendation Funding programmed responsible Partners/ Ranking Project Source for securing Resources Number S =Safety 2 = Tier 2 ($- millions) * (Biennium) funding EV =Econ Vitality M= Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ= Environ Qual WSDOT, Port of Bremerton SR 3 Widening - Widen to 6 lanes Kitsap Kitsap SR 3/25 (creating one HOV lane in each M/EV 3 $258m TBD TBD County Transit, direction) from Gorst to SR 304 Bremerton Puget Sound Naval Shipyard 3 SR 16 Widening - Widen to Kitsap WSDOT SR 6 -lanes ( creating one HOV lane in County Port of 16/30 each direction) from SR 160 to SR M /EV 3 $145m TBD TBD Port Bremerton 166 and re -strip from SR 166 to Orchard, Kitsap Gorst Bremerton Transit SR 3 /Sam Christopherson WSDOT, Interchange - Construct a new interchange to grade separating the Kitsap Port t of SR 3/34 SR 3 /Sam Christopherson Road M 3 $63m TBD TBD County, Bremerton, intersection and widen the SR 16 Bremerton Kitsap Transit Spur The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 109 B remerton E Dev Stu dy Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WTP Investment Guideline NSP Estimated Costs Implementation State P =Preservation 1 = Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route! Funding responsible Partners/ Ranking Project Recommendation Programmed for securing Resources S =Safety 2 = Tier 2 0-millions) * Source (Biennium) Number EV =Econ Vitality funding M =Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ =Environ Quai WSDOT Port of Bremerton, SR 3 /SR 304 Interchange - Kitsap Kitsap SR 3 Reconstruct interchange M 3 $48m TBD TBD County Transit Bremerton Puget Sound Naval 3 Shipyard WSDOT, Port of SR 3 Widening - Widen to 6 lanes Bremerton (creating one HOV lane in each Kitsap Kitsap SR 3 direction) from SR 304 to Loxie M /E:V 3 $31m TBD TBD County Transit, Eagans Boulevard and maintain the Bremerton Puget northbound auxiliary lane Sound Naval Shipyard WSDOT, SR 3 /Imperial Way - Intersection Kitsap Port of 4 SR3 /20 improvements add additional S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County Bremerton, channelization improvements Bremerton Kitsap Transit The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engmeenng analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 110 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WTP Investment Guideline NSP Estimated Costs Implementabon State P= Preservabon 1 = Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route/ Recommendation Funding Funding responsible Partner;/ Ranking Project Source for securing Resources Number S= Safety 2 = Tier 2 ($- millions) (Biennium) funding EV =Econ Vitality M= Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ =Environ Qual SR 3 Belfair Additional Non - Motorized Improvements - Widen exiting 2 -lane roadway to include Mason WSDOT 4 SR3/33 a bike lane and sidewalk in each S 1 $3m TBD TBD County Shelton direction with a closed drainage system from Old Belfair Highway to Belfair northern limit SR 3 /North Bay Road - Intersection improvements, install Mason WSDOT, 5 SR3 /19 roundabout or traffic signal based S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County Port of Allyn on detailed traffic study and warrants SR 3 /1-akeland Drive /Evans 6 SR 3/18 Street - Intersection improvements S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD Mason WSDOT, install traffic signal, based on County Port of Allyn detailed traffic study and warrants US 101 NB Ramps/Wallace WSDOT Kneeland Boulevard - Intersection Mason Port of 7 1015/5 improvements install traffic signal S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County, Shelton or roundabout, based on detailed Shelton Mason traffic study and warrants I Transit The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 111 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WTP Investment Guideline HSP Estimated Costs Implementation State P= Preservation 1 = Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route/ Recommendation Source programmed responsible Partners/ Ranking Project Source for securing Resources Number S= Safety 2 = Tier 2 ($- millions) * (Biennium) funding EV =Econ Vitality M =Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ =Envimn Quai SR 3 /Sunnyslope Road - WSDOT Intersection improvements install Kitsap Port of 8 SR 3/23 roundabout or traffic signal based S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County, Bremerton on detailed traffic study and Bremerton Kitsap warrants Transit SR 3 /Pickering Road - Intersection WSDOT, 9 SR 3/13 improvements, install roundabout S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD Mason Mason or traffic signal based on detailed County traffic study and warrants Transit US 101 /SR 102 - Intersection WSDOT US improvements, install roundabout Mason Port of 10 101/3 or traffic signal based on detailed S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County, Shelton traffic study and warrants Shelton Mason Transit SR 3 /Agate Road - Intersection SR 3/11 Mason improvements install roundabout Mason M or traffic signal based on detailed S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County Mason Transit traffic study and warrants - 11 SR 3 /Mason Lake Road - Intersection improvements, install Mason WSDOT, SR 3/9 roundabout or traffic signal, based S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County Mason on detailed traffic study and Transit warrants ' The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders pnontize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineenng analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and maybe higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 112 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WTP Investment Guideline HSP Estimated Costs State Implementation Agency Priority Route/ P =Preservation 1 = Tier 1 2008 Funding Funding responsible Partners/ Ranking Project Recommendation Source Programmed for securing Resources Number S =Safety 2 = Tier 2 ($- millions) * (Biennium) funding EV =Econ Vitality M =Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ =Enron Qual US 101 NB Ramps /Shelton- WSDOT, us Matlock Road - intersection Mason Port of 11 101//7 improvements, install roundabout S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County Shelton, or traffic signal, based on detailed Shelton Mason traffic study and warrants Transit WSDOT SR 3 Widening - Widen to Kitsap Port of 12 SR 3/21 4 lanes from imperial Way to S /M /E:V 3 $57m TBD TBD County, Bremerton, Sunnyslope Rd Bremerton Kitsap Transit New County Road & Improved SR 3 Intersection - Install new county connector roadways to combine traffic from Cranberry Creek Rd Deer Creek Rd and Agate WSDOT, 13 SR 3/12 Rd, install roundabout or traffic M 2 $gm TBD TBD Mason Mason signal at common point for traffic County movements with SR 3, limit access Transit at other locations to right- in /right- out (This project replaces Project SR 3 /Agate Rd and SR 3 /Cranberry Creek Rd projects) The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders pnont¢e projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineenng analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including nght -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergroundmg of utilities wig increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 113 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WTP Investment Guideline NSP Estimated Costs Implementation State P =Preservation 1 = Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route/ Recommendation Funding programmed responsible Partners/ Ranking Project Source for securing Resources Number S =Safety 2 = T ier 2 ($- millions) * (Biennium) funding EV =Econ Vdairty M =Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ =Environ Qual SR 16 Ramps/Tremont Street - Kitsap WSDOT 13 SR Widen Tremont St to 4 lanes, install S/M 2 $16m TBD TBD County, Kitsap 16/29 new signals at both NB and SB Port Transit ramp interchanges Orchard SR 3 /Grapeview Loop Road (north intersection) - Intersection Mason WSDOT, SR 3/15 improvements, install roundabout S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County Mason or traffic signal based on detailed Transit traffic study and warrants SR 3 Allyn Non- Motonzed 14 SR 3/17 Mason Improvements - Install sidewalks S 1 $8 Mason M curbs and gutters within Allyn m TBD TBD County Mason Transit business zone WSDOT, SR 3/22 SR 3 Widening -Widen to 4 lanes Kitsap Port of from Sunnyslope Rd to Gorst S /M /EV 3 $52m TBD TBD County Bremerton Bremerton Kitsap Transit US 101 SB Ramps /Shelton- Matlock Road - Intersection WSDOT 15 101/6 improvements, install new SB S/M 1 $3m TBD TBD Mason Mason off -ramp install traffic signal or County Transit roundabout based on detailed traffic study and warrants The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders pnontize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including right -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergroundmg of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 114 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WTP Investment Guideline HSP Estimated Costs Implementation State P= Preservation 1 =Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route/ Recommendation Funding programmed responsible Partners/ Ranking Project Source for securing Resources Number S =Safety 2 = Tiier 2 ($-millions) * (Biennium) funding EV =Econ Vitality M =Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ =Enron Qual SR 3 /Cranberry Creek Road - Intersection improvements install Mason WSDOT, 15 3/10 roundabout or traffic signal based S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County Mason on detailed traffic study and Transit warrants SR 16 Ramps /Sedgwick Road - Kitsap WSDOT, 15 16/28 Widen Sedgwick Rd to 4 lanes plus S/M 2 $16m TBD TBD County Kitsap turn lanes OPort Transit US 101 SB Ramps/Wallace WSDOT Kneeland Blvd - Intersection Mason Port of 16 101/4 improvements, install roundabout S/M 1 $2m TBD TBD County Shelton or traffic signal, based on detailed Shelton Mason traffic study and warrants Transit US 101 Widening - Widen to WSDOT, 4 -lanes from Wallace Kneeland Mason Port of 17 101/1 Blvd to Shelton Matlock Rd, M 3 $55m TBD TBD County Shelton improvements for Matlock Rd Shelton Mason interchange limited access - Transit freeway section SR 3 Safety Improvements - WSDOT 18 3/16 Standardizing shoulders from East S 1 $2m TBD TBD Mason Mason Grapewew Loop Road to Sherwood County Transit Creek Road The preliminary project costs are for planning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate fora proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders prioritize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are planning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including nght -of -way) rising material costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 115 Bremerton Economic Development Study Exhibit 5 -3 BEDS Implementation Action Matrix - Continued WTP investment Guideline HSP Estimated Costs Implementation State P =Preservation 1 = Tier 1 2008 Funding Agency Priority Route/ Recommendation Funding programmed responsible Partners/ Ranking Prefect Source for securing Resources Number S =Safety 2 = Tier 2 ($- millions) * (Biennium) funding EV =Econ Vitality - - M =Mobility 3 = Tier 3 EQ =Environ Quai US 101 Widening - Widen to WSDOT, 4 -lanes from Shelton Matlock Rd Mason Port of 19 101/2 to SR 3 improvements to the SR M 3 $58m TBD TBD County Shelton, 3 interchange limited access - Shelton Mason freeway section Transit SR 3 Safety Improvements - Widen shoulders from Pickering Rd to Grapeview Loop Rd, install SB Mason WSDOT, 20 3/14 left -turn lane at South Grapeview S 1 $72m TBD TBD County Mason Loop Rd, install NB right -turn lane Transit at North Grapeview Loop Rd and add passing lanes as warranted Belfair Area Safety & Widening Improvements - Widen exiting 2 -lane roadway to a 3 -lane roadway Currently (including two -way left turn lane State Gas Mason Funded 3/32 (TWLTL)) with a bike lane and S/M 1 $19m Tax 2014 WSDOT County sidewalk in each direction with a closed drainage system from SR 106 to Old Belfair Hwy The preliminary project costs are for panning purposes only and should be viewed as a starting point when determining a final cost estimate for a proposed project The preliminary project costs were created to help the stakeholders pnontize projects for the Bremerton Economic Development Study The preliminary project costs are in 2008 dollars are panning level and are not based on engineering analysis They do not account for potential environmental mitigation (including nght -of -way) rising matenal costs or other unforeseen expenditures that may occur during design or construction Cost to meet water quality is difficult to estimate without more design and may be higher than estimated Also unknown utility relocation or undergrounding of utilities will increase the costs These factors may increase the final costs of individual projects March 2012 - Final 116 Bremerton Economic Development Study What are the long -term (beyond 2020) improvements? To meet the mobility needs of the area and to implement the long - range vision for the study corridors, additional improvements are needed along US 101, SR 1, and SR 16 The study team has identified additional projects that need further study These long -range projects are listed in Exhibit 5 -4 March 2012 - Final 117 Bremerton Economi D S Exhibit 5 -4 Additional Long -Range Projects to Meet Transportation Needs Beyond 2020 Proposed Project Location Project Issues Segment Description of Improvement M Fr Milepost Problems / Bottlenecks / Congestion / Delays US 101 Widening from SR 102 to Wallace Rural congestion travel speed will be less 1 Kneeland Boulevard - Widen from 2 lanes 34344 34711 than 70% of posted speed by 2030 to 4 lanes SR 3 Widening from US 101 to south Rural congestion travel speed will be less 1 Shelton City limits - Widen from 2 lanes to 000 1 58 than 70% of posted speed by 2030 4 lanes SR 3 Widening from south of Johns Rural congestion travel speed will be less 1 Prairie Road to Mason Lake Road - 500 724 than 70% of posted speed by 2030 Widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes SR 3 Widening from Mason Lake Road Rural congestion travel speed will be less 2 to Pickering Road - Widen from 2 lanes to 724 1076 than 70% of posted speed by 2030 4 lanes SR 3 /Mason Benson Road - Intersection improvements, install roundabout, traffic 2 signal, and /or additional channelization, 1424 1424 Intersection LOS F by 2030 based on detailed traffic study and warrants SR 3 Improvements from Grapeview Loop Road to Belfair - Traffic forecasts 3 show traffic congestion through the Allyn 2032 2491 Congestion travel speed will be less than area by 2030, further study is needed to 70% of posted speed by 2030 investigate traffic flows through the Allyn area and determine appropriate solution SR 3 Widening from Belfair to Imperial Exceed maximum throughput by 2030, travel 4 Way - Widen from 2 lanes to 4 lanes 2878 3051 speed will be less than 70% of posted speed by 2030 SR 3 /Imperial Way - Intersection improvements, additional channelization Exceed maximum throughput by 2030, 4 or grade separation may be needed to 3051 3051 Intersection LOS F by 2030 with interim meet 2030 LOS standards Monitor traffic improvements increases to determine when further improvements are needed SR 3 Widening from Belfair to Imperial 4 Way - Widen to 4 lanes as a divided 2708 3051 Exceed maximum throughput by 2030 highway, restrict access to right -in/ right -out March 2012 -Final 118 Bremerton Economic Development Study Chapter 6 - Next Steps What are the next steps? The Bremerton Economic Development Study (BEDS) was initiated to identify transportation improvements to support the growth and This chapter presents an employment projections within the study area Existing and projected overview of the next steps traffic volumes were analyzed, current safety issues were identified towards integration with and local agencies and area residents were invited to participate in the other plans, obtaining process with their assessments of the transportation issues in project funding, and the corridor initiating implementation of the BEDS vision for study However, revenue to implement the identified improvements is very corridors limited Specific actions that should betaken to position the BEDS proposed improvements for future implementation include • Incorporate the BEDS recommended improvements in the State Highway System Plan (HSP) and the regional plan (Transportation 2040) • Incorporate the BEDS recommended improvements, as appropriate, in county and city comprehensive plans • Adopt a cooperative funding strategy with WSDOT and stakeholders �o , March 2012 - Final 119 Bremerton Economic Development Study What are the State's Transportation Policy Goals? In 2007, the Washington State Legislature and the Governor created five investment policies for planning, operations, performance, and investment in the state's transportation system as outlined in RCW 47 04 280 (derived from Senate Bill 5412) A sixth policy goal was added by the legislature in 2010 Investment in the state transportation system must support one or more of the following policy goals • Economic Vitality To promote and develop transportation systems that stimulate, support, and enhance the movement of people and goods to ensure a prosperous economy • Preservation To mamtam, preserve, and extend the life and utility of prior investments in transportation systems and services • Safety To provide for and improve the safety and security of transportation customers and the transportation system • Mobility To improve the predictable movement of goods and people throughout Washington state • Environment To enhance Washington's quality of life through transportation investments that promote energy conservation, enhance healthy communities, and protect the environment • Stewardship To continuously improve the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the transportation system March 2012 -Final 120 Bremerton Economic Development Study Washington Transportation Plan (WTP) - 2007 -2026 The 2007 -2026 Washington Transportation Plan (WTP) is the long range, multnnodal transportation plan for the state The WTP covers all modes in the transportation system and is - required by state and federal law The current plan covers the period from 2007 -2026 Because the plan projects nearly $38 .r billion in unfunded needs, it has established guiding principles for investments in current and future facilities The guiding principles in the WTP largely reflect the policy goals adopted by the State Legislature in RCW 47 04 280 (see discussion on previous page under "Transportation Policy Goals ") According to the 2007 -2026 Washington Transportation Plan, current law funding for the 20 -year WTP period provides approximately $29 billion for transportation projects, including the 2003 Nickel Package and the 2005 Transportation Partnership Act (TPA) e.. �r Highway System Plan (HSP) The Highway System Plan addresses current and forecasted needs for state -owned and operated highways in the state of Washington As a "living" document, the HSP is updated every two years The recommendations from studies such as this SR 518 Route Development Plan Amendment help provide the basis for each new iteration of the HSP The HSP contains a constrained and unconstrained section The constrained section lists projects and revenue that would be available to fund the projects The unconstrained section of the HSP lists additional projects and project needs without a funding source The HSP project list is re- prioritized every two years as WSDOT prepares its biennial budget The recommendations contained in this report are currently not included in the HSP March 2012 - Final 121 Bremerton Economic Development Study Why are regional plans important? Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) and Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPO) have specific responsibilities under both federal and state law relating to transportation and growth management planning The organizations that perform these planning functions within the study area are the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), the MPO for Krtsap, King, Pierce, and Snohormsh Counties and the Peninsula RTPO, which serves Mason, Krtsap, Jefferson, and Clallam Counties Transportation 2040 is the current transportation plan adopted by PSRC This regional plan focuses on the transportation system investments needed to provide an integrated, multimodal transportation system in the Central Puget Sound For transportation projects to receive federal funding, they must be consistent with and included in these regional transportation plans The Peninsula RTPO adopted its Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) in 1995 and last updated it in 2006 The RTPO is currently in the process of updating the entire plan, which is scheduled to be adopted in the summer of 2011 The RTPO intends it to be used as a blueprint for local jurisdictions within the region to develop and coordinate regional transportation priorities to better serve the region's needs as a whole March 2012 -Final 122 Bremerton Economic Development Study Why are local agency plans important? The two most important reasons a project should be incorporated into a regional plan are • It demonstrates to funding agencies that the plan has support at state, regional, and local levels • It addresses a critical requirement under the Growth Management Act, which requires plans to be consistent between and among jurisdictions For which funding sources could the recommended projects compete? There are a variety of funding sources that can be utilized to fund the BEDS recommendations Given the current economic climate, coupled with the limited dollars that are available for projects and the stiff competition for available funding, one or all of the sources listed below might be needed to fund the improvements These sources include Local Agency Funding - To be eligible for and competitive in most grant programs, local matching dollars are required — in fact, the more local participants are involved in and support a project financially, the more competitive a grant application can become In addition to local matching dollars for grants, some communities have formed transportation benefit districts to raise funds for transportation projects These districts, formed by the local government(s) through legislative action or a vote of the people, levy a tax for a specific transportation project within that jurisdiction(s) State law regarding benefit transportation districts should be consulted before such a district is established by thejurisdiction(s) March 2012 - Final 123 Bremerton Economic Development Study Development Impact Fees - The use of development impact fees to fund public facilities that are necessary to provide services for new developments and maintain acceptable level -of- service has been widely used in Washington and across the U S Development impact fees are one -time charges applied to new developments Their goal is to raise revenue for the construction or expansion of capital facilities located outside the development to maintain an acceptable level -of- service for all users Impact fees are assessed and dedicated principally for the provision of additional water and sewer systems, roads, schools, libraries, parks, and recreation facilities made necessary by the presence of new residents in the area As new developments are approved, consideration should be given to their impact on the operation of local, county, and state highways within the proxirruty of the new development State Fundmg - The state of Washington also administers a number of funding programs that can be used for transportation projects The most common source of state grant funds for projects along the BEDS corridors is the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) "The Washington State Legislature created the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) to foster state investment in quality local transportation projects The TIB distributes grant funding, which comes from the revenue generated by three cents of the statewide gas tax, to cities and counties for funding transportation projects " For the BEDS improvements, these funds can be used by the incorporated cities to lead selected improvement projects within their jurisdictions, such as intersection improvements or parallel street improvements than can divert traffic from the state highway along the corridor Federal Funds - One of the most common sources of funding for mayor highway projects is the federal SAFETEA -LU program or the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act A Legacy for Users "With guaranteed funding for highways, highway safety, and public transportation totaling $244 1 billion, SAFETEA -LU represents the largest surface transportation investment in our nation's history The two landmark bills that brought surface transportation into the 21st century - the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA -21) - shaped the March 2012 -Final 124 Bremerton Eco Development Study highway program to meet the nation's changing transportation needs SAFETEA -LU builds on this firm foundation, supplying the funds and refining the programmatic framework for investments needed to maintain and grow our vital transportation infrastructure " Within SAFETEA -LU, the Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding that may be used by states and localities for projects on any federal -aid highway In addition, the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) provides a flexible funding source to state and local governments for transportation projects and programs to help meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act While there are many sources of federal grants, including direct legislative "earmarks ", these two are the most commonly used for projects similar to those along the BEDS corridor SAFETEA -LU expired on September 30, 2009 Efforts are currently underway in the U S Congress, USDOT, and national organizations to help shape the next act Each state and Regional Transportation Planning Organization should help shape the act and the types of projects to be funded within the act County Road Administration Board - The County Road Administration Board (CRAB) manages three grant programs to help counties meet their transportation needs The programs are administered with maximum flexibility and minimum overhead • Rural Arterial Program (RAP) - The RAP is a road and bridge reconstruction funding program that counties compete for every two years within their respective regions Taken from fuel tax revenues, the account generates approximately $40 million per biennium Less than 3 percent is used for administration of the program ( WAC 136 -100) • County Arterial Preservation Program (CAPP) — The CAPP program is designed to help counties preserve their existing paved arterial road networks The program generates approximately $30 million per biennium Less than 3 percent of the revenue is spent for administration (WAC 136 -300) March 2012 - Final 125 v� o t � Y , I �J} o a � cw a a C= cw e@ 9 y V ' ° �41 �s n ^^ 11 y d f 4� I o A6 f n F3 �° D - � k- 1 I ° a C AW lo I d J (b t °a rn ® " r 1 i ° 030 4 � t � 4 a o � GO S A G 0 ■ Gorst Urban Growth Area - County jurisdiction ■ 2009 - City and Health District installed City Sewer to UGA ■ Prime for Redevelopment ■ 2012 - City and County jointly worked for future • Ecology grant • Project Partners (agencies, tribe), Planning Commission, Open Houses, Advisory Committee Meetings, City Council, Board of County Commissioners - Total 24 meetings between Oct 2012 -Dec 2013 F G S FO RT ■ December 2013: ■ City Council and Board of County Commissioners approved Watershed Plan and Subarea Plan GORST URBAN GROWTH AREA PLANNING IZ A o.. WWW.GORSTWATERSH ED.COM ■ Subarea Plan, Watershed Characterization, Environmental Impact Statement (Draft and Final), summary /handouts of meetings, comments received, all documentation, etc. PROJECT OBJECTIVE Objectives Status • Make Gorst a place where ■ Watershed Framework people want to live, shop and recreate, Plan and Gorst Subarea • Protect water quality, habitat and fish while fostering Plan Adopted - 2013 economic development, • Identify areas for development, 'Establishes vision, plan, restoration and protection capital needs based on based on science, science • Adopt a land use plan for Gorst, and ■ Planned Action • Implement a long -range capital improvement plan to provide for ■ Facilitates economic future utility services, public development while services and transportation needs. protecting environment PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FUTURE LAND USE MAP GORST = SUBAREA Werst Bremerton UGA e PLAN CdyofBremerren __ i Color area is Neighborhood Mixed Use , '' UGA r r • Gorst UGA ✓ • Use F Gorst Creek Lowtntensity Commercial r'� Mixed Use^ Res i d ential Residential ` 4 ; UGA Boundary s fl ..-- -� 4° ❑ City Limits t y am~ J Preferred Alternative Land Use • Sp r Open 5�cer = 6bm" e� Lawintensdy kewVatPdQ t Y U J Waterfront _ _ t ❑Commercial Corndor ❑ Industrial t ! ' Gorst Mixed Use _ - = Neighborhood Mixed Use Gorst Mixed Use Y � r Low Intensely Mixed Use .» r „� .. low Intensely Waterfront Cky of Brerr=ertmr Gorst Creek Residential ❑ open Space/Recreation Note Mineral resource extraction may continue in near term a 01 02 o i No nn b r oI " Note Thn, zone is similar to Low Intensity Waterfront except that residential development is allowed I I source Kte pLounty BERK Mtlea A A PLANNED ACTION? • Advances environmental impact review of proposed development ■ Occurs at the planning stage • Identifies mitigation measures • No additional SEPA review for implementing development if consistent with EIS and mitigation measures • Provides certainty for public and developers for long -term projects • SKIA regulated under a planned action - 2012 s�i J fi K t �6 WHAT IS IN THE PLANNED ACTION? The Planned Action Ordinance: • Is based on Planned Action EIS analysis as well as public and agency comment • Identifies a planned action area - the Gorst Subarea • Establishes thresholds of growth for land use, traffic trips • Requires mitigation measures • Establishes a planned action consistency review process • Includes periodic monitoring Rtl "ys- PLANNED ACTION PROCESS Prepare &Issue Consider Adoption- �g �� Review�Futu�ei�° Y�a � z Environrrientai� a r pqf Planned Action _ ,a 4 i Permits fo r 8� Ordinance � Consisten with � Impact�Statement 'O w v b c�! �v_defining allowed � �� Planned Action � � °� t s ` r a tz N e�� Kx Bevek me" & � y �� Ordrnancewan'd � . - 4 ` a v t x- z�4required�- � � Go <rst S�uki`area�a COdtdbe r�8;�20$1� 144 � � � �� w gation a Planes a vp $, - x 4. &,,,,ti 'Fe c § a cW`m e 5,7Y t w" k as �r N ° 1A. 0 F K :� Public & Agency Input ➢ Community ➢ Planning ➢ Planned ➢ Planning ➢ City Council Workshops Commission Action Commission Hearing & _ meetings Community Hearing & Deliberation Meeting Deliberation LAND USE THRESHOLDS Land Use Planned Action Value Residential Dwellings (units) 585 Commercial Square Feet 156,639 Would result in over 1000 persons and greater commercial square feet than has occurred in past Can flex between housing/ commercial square footage as long as meeting traffic trips assumed TRANSPORTATION THRES 0 S Peak Hour Daily Trips Trips Preferred Alternative - 2010 -2035 Trips 5 572 Mix of land use in Gorst shown to improve regional highway traffic over other alternatives n EXAMPLE MITIGATION MEASURES • Water Resources: ■ Water quality treatment shall consist of Low Impact Development (LID) systems or techniques, consistent with BMC 15.04.020 and the Gorst Subarea Plan... • Transportation: ■ ...All new developments or redevelopments shall be designed to direct traffic either north (Sherman Heights) or west (Sam Christopherson Avenue or West Belfair Valley Road) of the SR 3/ SR 16 junction... • Parks: ■ The City shall require that master planned developments within the Gorst UGA provide parks and /or open space as part of the development in order to serve the residents of that development and offset the need for the City to acquire and develop additional facilities. QUESTIONS PLANNED ACTION PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE FUTURE LAND USE MAP t t t = V*d Wernerton UGA f = cryasrernbton r > t t Neighborhood Mixed Use � p F� t N� Gorst UGA a Gorsi Creek Mixed � Restden(rai �� Use ^ t tit ; UGA Boundary + y r — ❑ City Limits / �Io Preferred Alterrtatwe Land Use _ Low Intensity Pe0 $P?� Eteueatran r Commercial Corridor e_ r Gprttd� c� VWtertront t ❑ industrial Gorst Mixed Use Neigttboittood Mixed Use Gorst Mixed Use Loa intertstiv Mixed Use r Low Intensity Watedroro CttydBremerton Gorst Creek Residential 7 Open Space/Recreatton Note Minerif resource extraction may continue in near term ` 0 01 02 tD r roremM :113 Note This zone is similar to Low Intensity Waterfront except Ibat residential development is allowed A t t i of t,;- 0-1r BERK p,t�log