HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/28/2013 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 ❑ Phone (360) 473 -5280
AUGUST 28, 2013
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
Beginning at 5:00 PM in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603
The Study Session is open to the public but there will be no opportunities for input or participation; no action
is anticipated during the Study Session, and the content of these items is subject to change. If approved by
the City Council, the items will be placed on the September 4, 2013 Council Meeting Agenda.
N PRESENTATION PLANNED — The following item are budgeted items or have already
A. O E g s g y
been reviewed by appropriate the a ro riate Council Committee:
1. Interlocal Agreement between the City of Poulsbo and the City of Bremerton relating to the
Special Operations Group (SOG)
2. Interlocal Agreement between the City of Poulsbo and the City of Bremerton relating to
Traffic Safety Operations
3. Interlocal Agreement between the City of Poulsbo and the City of Bremerton relating to
Marine Patrol Services
B. FULL PRESENTATION ITEMS
4. Purchase of four (4) Handheld [Parking] Citation Devices from CiteZone.com (Information
only...)
L ease for P PaFk SOGGer ii with We6t Se Rd FG DromieF SOGGer Club
Item Pulled...
6. Proposed public hearing and resolution to recover fees for abatement costs on the property
located at 1926 North Callow Avenue
7. Proposed public hearing and ordinance to amend Title 20 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
(BMC) entitled "Zoning Code" related to SEPA Exemptions, Drive - through Requirements and
Commercial Setbacks
C. GENERAL COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Finance & Investment Committee Briefing (8128113 Meeting) — Eric Younger, Chair
2. Finalize 2014 City Council Goals — Greg Wheeler, Council President
3. Other General Council Business (As necessary...)
D. ADJOURNMENT OF STUDY SESSION
® Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations
should contact the City Cleric's Office at (360) 473 -5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Council meeting.
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON $ 4,
CITY COUNCIL
■ seaeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee■
SUBJECT Purchase of four (4) handheld Study Session Date 8/28/13
citation devices from CiteZone com (info COUNCIL MEETING Date ; N -
only) Department Finance /City Clerk
Presenter Shannon Conn
Phone 473 -5323
SUMMARY The City issued an RFP for four (4) handheld citation devices closing on July 22, 2013
The best proposal meeting our requirements is from CiteZone com for the Motorola MC75A handheld
and Zebra RW420 Thermal Printers for a cost of under $22,000 This cost includes the purchase of
the four (4) handhelds with printers, accessories for the equipment, 3 year software cost, 3 year
maintenance on hardware and software and $1,000 trade -in on current equipment Continuing
annual cost is estimated at $1,400 per year for paper and envelopes for the handhelds After the third
year, software and maintenance annual cost is estimated at $2,300 per year
ATTACHMENTS Proposal and proposal comparison
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) $22,000 from the Parking System fund Currently
there is $688,000 available in the fund to purchase the equipment Current O &M costs for our current
handhelds and system is $24,000 per year Estimated future O &M costs is $4,000 per year
STUDY SESSION AGENDA ❑ No Discussion ® Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION
No Action Required — Information Only
COUNCIL ACTION ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 11/02/12
Proposal
for
Parking Citation Handhelds
for the
City of Bremerton
t
Cite
WEB BASED CITATION PROCESSING
Submitted by•
CiteZONE.com
July 22, 2013
23151 Verdugo Drive, Suite 202, Laguna Hills, California 92653
Cite �N�.com
Ms Shannon Conn July 22, 2013
City Clerk
City of Bremerton
345 a Street, Suite 600
Bremerton, WA 98337
Dear Ms Conn
The founders and executives of CiteZONE.corn (CZ) have been providing
parking citation issuance and processing systems and services since 1980 In 1986 we
developed the first single unit handheld computer with a bulk-in printer - AutoCITE In
fact we all worked at Enforcement Technology, Inc in 1994 when you purchased your
first AutoCITEs and our AutoPARK System We are pleased to provide our proposal in
response to your RFP for Parking Citation Handhelds
Our proposal here offers two choices of handheld computer systems We also
offer a $1,000.00 trade -in allowance for your 4 AutoCITEs and 1 charger.
In addition our state -of- the -art Citation Issuance Systems our Web Based
Citation Processing System can provide your agency with all of the functionality for your
staff to access through the intemet while we provide the technical support CZ provides
and operates our systems so you need no hardware or software except a PC with a
Web Browser We provide the Integrated Voice Response (IVR) System and our
PublicAccessZone com for Initial Reviews & Administrative Hearing Requests and the
Internet Payment (IPAY) gateway interface We also provide the DMV connection for
the Registered Owner (R/O) Information Exchange along with the R/O Holds and
Releases If you process your own citations it's FREE We supply all of the above and
you supply the staff and management. If you should be interested in a citation
processing system or services please contact us.
Sincerely,
Ga Ward, Ph D (888) 755 -2011 Ext 104
Chairman garyward @citezone com
23161 Verdugo Drive, Suite 202, Laguna Hills, California 92653
Page 1 of 3
From "Gary Ward" <garywardGOWons corm
Subject Fwd RE Handhelds RFP
Sent date 07115/2013 02 42 PM
To <aty derk@d bremerton waus>
Shannon
We looked for addenda on you webszte but did not find any We submit this with our proposal just as
proof of receipt Normally we would bind our proposal but the RFP was very specific "Do not include
special bmgmgs, colored displays, promotional materials, etc" Although not in the proposal text we
did provide Attachments to support our proposal
Thanks
Gary
Gary E. Ward, Ph.D.
Chairman
C teZONE com
(888) 755 -2011 Ext 104
(888) 388 -0484 Fax
----- Forwarded message from Gary Ward <garyward @crtezone com> -----
Date• Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09 39 33 -0700
From Gary Ward <garyward @citezone com>
Reply -To Gary Ward <garyward @citezone com>
Subject RE Handhelds RFP
To City Clerk <City Clerk @ci bremerton wa us>
Thanks Shannon
Gary
Gary E. Ward, Ph.D.
Chairman
CiteZONE com
(888) 755 -2011 Ext. 104
(888) 388 -0484 Fax
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09 15 46 -0700, City Clerk <City Clerk@ci bremerton wa us> wrote
Dear Mr Ward,
7/22113 is the correct date
7/15/2013
Page 2 of 3
Thank you
Shannon C®rin
City Clerk
City of Bremerton
(360) 473 -5323
From- Gary Ward (mailto garyward@citezone corn]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 8 52 AM
To. City Clerk
Subject: Handhelds RFP
Your RFP for Handhelds lists two submittal dates, 7/22 and then #3 in the instructions states 7/15
Can you clarify the correct date?
Thanks
Gay
Gary E. Ward, Ph.D.
Chairman
CrteZONE com
(888) 755 -2011 Ext 104
(888) 388 -0484 Fax
7/15/2013
cae ®N ,Com
City of Bremerton
Table of Contents
I COMPANY INFORMATION 1
A Management and Organization 2
B Executive Team 3
C Key Executive Experience 4
II. CITATION SYSTEMS and SERVICES 7
A Web Based Citation Processing - BASE SYSTEM 7
B Web Based Citation Processing - CITATION SERVICES CENTER 7
C PublicAccessZone com 7
D Handheld Computer Systems 8
E Installation, Training and Implementation Schedule 13
111. REFERENCES and EXPERIENCE 15
IV. PRICE PROPOSAL 20
V. ATTACHMENTS
A Handheld Computer (Motorola and Zebra) Brochures
B Parking Cdabons and Photos
C Management Information System Reports
D Sample User License and Maintenance Agreement
QteZONE.com
1 COMPANY INFORMATION
CiteZONE.com, LLC (CZ) is a California Limited Liability Company The CZ
founders and executives, collectively have over 100 years of experience in Parking and
Traffic Enforcement, Handheld Parking Citation and Traffic Ticket Issuance and Parking
Citation Processing and Collection Systems and Services Our team brings vast
experience and energy to a new concept of citation processing in these difficult and
trying economic times for both the public and private sectors
For over twenty five years the Founders of C7, owners, executives and
managers at Enforcement Technology, Inc (ETEC) and then Duncan Solutions
provided Automated Parking Citation and Traffic Ticket Issuance and Management
Systems and Services for over 600 customers worldwide We now provide those same
services through our Web Based Citation Processing System Our collective past
experience includes processing services for issuing agencies with varying quantities of
citations for each, and over 40,000,000 per year
CZ provides a fully integrated Public Access Zone via the Internet directly, or
linked to your agency home page, for citizen access to our citation processing database
for citation inquiry, payments and contesting CZ citation processing service centers
provide full Integrated Voice Response (IVR) Systems for citation inquiry, payments and
contesting CZ provides for Special Delinquent Collections processing and a National
Network (NLETS) for the pursuit of Out-of-State Delinquent Citations Based on our
efficient and effective approach to this process, and some statistical research done over
the last 30 years of processing parking citations, we can expect to improve your total
citation collection rate (revenue collected), across the country, to 90 %, or better A key
factor is the celerity of the process The earlier you approach the collections the more
positive the impact
We also bring unique handheld computer experience In 1985 our Chairman,
Gary Wand, was one of the inventors and developers of the first handheld computer with
a built -in printer for the parking industry the AutoCITE ETEC, which was founded in
1986, was acquired by Duncan Solutions in 2004 The CZ staff was also integral to the
development and management team at ETEC when the first AutoPROCESS Parking
Citation Processing System was installed at Milwaukee in 1998 That system is still
operational today and is now proprietary to Duncan Solutions
Ms. Linda French will be the CZ Project Manager and Ms. Melissa Ward will be
the Assistant Project Manager Both of these individuals bring extensive parking
citation processing experience to this project and are very familiar with the parking
operations of the City of Bremerton
1
CiteZONE.com
A. Mananement and Organization
,
Melissa Ward Gary Ward
President & CEO Chaimian
i
Mary Soto Linda French Rich Brim
Vice President Vice President Vice President
Sales & Marketing Operations Management Systems Management
Sales Staff Operations Programming Support
Manager
Data Entry
Customer
Service
Cash
Management
Call Center
2
CiteZONE.com
B. Executive Team
Melissa Ward - President and Chief Executive Officer
Ms Ward is the Founder of CdeZONE com Her experience goes back to 1986 when she
was responsible for naming the "AutoCITE ", which has become the most well- known, and
highly rated, handheld computer in the Parking Industry She also brings to the Company her
Accounting, Finance, Marketing and Operations experience of 13 years with one of the
industry's largest Product and Service Vendors providing Automated Parking Citation
Issuance, Processing and Collections Systems and Services
Linda G French - Vice President, Operations Management
With a very distinguished career in of Sales, Marketing and Operations Management,
including 25 years in Operations Management of Automated Parking Citation and Traffic
Ticket Issuance, Processing and Collections Systems and Services Ms French combines
her collection of unique experiences with her overall responsibilities for Operations
Management and Support of the Systems and Services of the Company
Mary Soto — Vice President, Sales and Marketing
After some 30 years of Municipal Government Services, both as an employee and as a
Service Vendor, Ms Soto also joined CdeZONE corn as an inaugural member Her
experience includes 15 years of Sales, Marketing and Management of Automated Parking
Citation Issuance, Processing and Collections Systems and Services She has primary
responsibilities for the Operations and Support of the Company Systems and Services
Rich Brim — Vice President, Systems Management
Prior to joining CiteZONE corn as an inaugural member, Mr Brim was responsible for
Database Administration with a very large Service Vendor providing Automated Parking
Citation Issuance, Processing and Collections Systems and Services His responsibilities are
Systems Design, Development and Management of the Systems and Services of the
Company He has over 20 years' experience with similar systems
Gary E Ward, Ph D — Chairman
Dr Ward holds masters degrees in Management and Public Administration and a doctorate in
Criminal Justice He has over 45 years of law enforcement and parking industry experience
As founder and CEO of Enforcement Technology, Inc (ETEC), he guided their growth
providing Parking Citation and Traffic Ticket Issuance, Processing and Collections Systems
and Services to over 600 customers worldwide before he retired in 2006 He has joined
CiteZONE corn to provide management experience and administrative guidance
CReZ ®NE com
C. Key Executive Experience
Name: Melissa J. Ward Experience while at Enforcement Technology and
Duncan Solutions
a Pwton Division Controller, Corporate Controller Support
and Service Bureau Operations
b Years with company 11
c Recent assignments & Relevant City of Bremerton
Experience City of Atlanta
City of Somerville
City of Long Beach
City of San Diego
City of Milwaukee
City of Pasadena
City of Monterey
City of Pacific Grove
Carmel-by-the-Sea
City of Walnut Creek
Mann Parking Autho
d Roles & Responsibilities in On -Going Customer Support
Connection with this Proposal please refer to Executive Team Profiles
FYears ind&,G:IFrench° ° s ' ' i Experience while at Enforcement Technology and
Duncan Solutions
n Vice President — O erat ions
with Com an 25
Assignments & Relevant City of Bremerton
nce City of Chicago
City of Ottawa
City of Milwaukee
City of Pasadena
City of Glendale
City of Long Beach
City of San Diego
City of Monterey
Carmel -by- the -Sea
City of Pacific Grove
City of Walnut Creek
County of Santa Clara
Mann Parking Autho
d Roles & Responsibilities in Administrative Support
Connection with this Pro osal lease refer to Executive Team Profiles
4
FPwton Mary Soto Experience while at Enforcement Technology and
Duncan Solutions
Southern California Operations Manager
ith company 17
c Recent Assignments & Relevant City of Bremerton
Experience City of Glendale
City of San Diego
City of Berkeley
City of Alhambra
City of Pasadena
City of Long Beach
City of San Diego
City of Monterey
Carmel -by- the -Sea
City of Pacific Grove
City of Walnut Creek
County of Santa Clara
Mann Parking Authon
d Roles & Responsibilities in Service Bureau Operations
Connection with this Proposal please refer to Executive Team Profiles
Name: Rich Brim Experience while at Enforcement Technology and
Duncan Solutions
a Position Director of Information Technol
b Years with company 6
c Recent assignments & Relevant City of Bremerton
Experience City of Ottawa
City of Chicago
City of Milwaukee
City of Pasadena
City of Glendale
City of Long Beach
City of Monterey
Carmel-by-the-Sea
City of Pacific Grove
City of Walnut Creek
County of Santa Clara
Mann Parking Author
d Roles & Responsibilities in Product Support
Connection with this Proposal please refer to Executive Team Profiles
5
tvwrY Experience while at Enforcement Technology and
Duncan Solutions
a Position President and CEO
b Years with Company 19
c Recent Assignments & Relevant City of Bremerton
Experience City of Chicago
City of Ottawa
City of Milwaukee
City of Pasadena
City of Glendale
City of Long Beach
City of San Diego
City of Monterey
Carmel -by- the -Sea
City of Pacific Grove
City of Walnut Creek
County of Santa Clara
Mann Parking Authority
County of Los Angeles
d Roles & Responsibilities in Administrative Support
Connection with this Proposal lease refer to Executive Team Profiles
Name; Leonard Long Experience while at Enforcement Technology and
Duncan Solutions
a Position Northern California Regional Director
b Years with Company 18
c Recent Assignments & Relevant City of Bremerton
Experience Carmel -by- the -Sea
City of Pacific Grove
County of Santa Clara
County of Mann
City of Walnut Creek
City of Alameda
City of Lafayette
County of Alameda
County of Santa Clara
Mann Parkq Authori
d Roles & Responsibilities in Administrative Support
Connection with this Proposal Law Enforcement Consultant
6
CiteZONE.com
II CITATION SYSTEMS and SERVICES
CIteZONE.com markets and sells systems and services to city, county, state and
college agencies who issue parking citations Our market target focuses on agencies
who issue 50,000 or less parking or other types of citations annually Our goal is to
provide these medium or small size agencies a cost effective processing system
operating via the mtemet It's FREE, all you need is a PC and a web browser
A. Web Based Citation Processing — BASE SYSTEM
The BASE SYSTEM functions are provided by CZ staff with daily operations
performed by agency staff CZ provides the system hardware, software and technical
support, the IVR and IPAY interface, and the DMV connection for RIO processing and
DMV holds and releases We provide and support the system and you operate it all via
the Internet
B. Web Based Citation Processing — CITATION SERVICES CENTER
In addition to providing the BASE SYSTEM all of the functions of the system can
be operated by CZ staff through this FULL SERVICE OPTION Once the agency issues
the citation, either with handheld computers or manually, those citations are submitted
to CZ for full processing and follow -up based on state guidelines The functionality is
the same whether the system is operated by the agency or by CZ through our service
center We also provide Motorola handholds and Zebra printers or Schweeers.
sinale unit handholds for purchase or lease.
C PublicAccessZone.com
CitsZONE.com provides a fully integrated Public Access Zone via the Internet
directly as well as linked to the issuing agency home page, for access to our citation
processing database for citation inquiry, payments and contesting The ZONE allows
the public to access information quickly without interaction with the agency staff
Installment of the ZONE conveys a tech savvy, customer oriented agency image to the
public Additional Web Based systems provided by the agency can run in parallel with
the ZONE making it a one -stop information center for your customers
Citizens can gain access from their home computer, their Internet capable cell
phone, or from a PC (or kiosk d you prefer) in the lobby of the agency Once in the
ZONE they can inquire about their citation(s), review Contesting Guidelines, review
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), request initial Reviews and /or Administrative
Hearings, or make Payments
7
CIteZONE.Com
D. Handheld Computer Systems (brochures and samples in attachments)
CiteZONE.com provides an Automated Citation Issuance System that
operates on a WINDOWS based Host PC System, or network Server, and does not
include any of the processing functions A communications program (IssueZONE or
Politess) synchronizes the conversion of the automatic data entry files to the Main CZ
System The Motorola computers and Zebra printers or Schweers one -piece systems
(with built-in pnnters) are designed to be easily portable and used primarily by Parking
Enforcement Officers (PEO), who walk most of their shift, or Traffic Officers (TO), who
nde motorcycles Over 1,200 agencies worldwide use these systems with more than
10,000 officers issuing about 100,000,000 citations annually The below listed
subsystems are available
Parking Citations Traffic Tickets Public Contacts Field Investigations
Transit Violations Code Enforcement Abandoned Vehicles Animal Violations
The CZ System is designed for mostly single stylus or key stroke entry of the
citation information with most of the information stored in memory as described above
The time of day, and the date are automatic, kept by a real -time clock and checked daily
through the Host Computer (PC) The citation number is automatically kept and
incremented by the PDA. This allows for total control of the number and at the same
time unlimited flexibility
The PEO completes most of the information being used during the day on the
first citation issued (name, badge number, geocode, department) These fields are then
kept in memory and print automatically for each subsequent citation Printing occurs
after the required information is entered With the exception of the vehicle license
number, the remaining entries are completed with minimal keystrokes Upon
completion of the citation the printed copy is then removed for placement on the vehicle
Complete editing is possible to correct any errors In addition a second copy can be
printed if the first had errors and was corrected Multiple copies, as many as you want,
can also be printed before going on to the next citation
1. Parking Citations, Administrative Citations & Traffic Tickets
Many times the question is asked if the same handheld computer can issue
parking citations, administrative citations and /or traffic tickets at the same time For
most Vendors the answer is NO because they have differing text on the back for
payment and adjudication Although it is true parking and administrative citations, and
traffic tickets have different text it "IS" possible to issue both on the same handheld
computer The CZ solution allows the use of the same paper stock for ALL types We
8
CdeZONE.com
were the first company (ETEC) in the country to issue Traffic Tickets at the Livermore
Police Department in 1989 Obviously in over 20 years this technology has changed
considerably, but we continue to enhance our systems providing the most efficient and
economical solutions in today's market.
The Santa Clara Police Department in California uses the same Motorola
handheld and Zebra printer we propose for this project to issue their Traffic Tickets
The same exact systems can issue Parking Citations at the same time without changing
paper Our parking issuance software is fully compatible and a Parking Citation
template is sent to the printer with the correct information on the front and back In the
case of Santa Clara they elected to use the same Zebra printer to issue Parking
Citations but use 3" wide paper with pre - printed parking payment and contesting
information Please see the attachments for these examples
2. Traffic Ticket Software and On -Line Records Dissemination
If you choose our Parking Citation Issuance and Processing Systems and/or
Services you can also get our Traffic Ticket Software, On -Line Records
Dissemination (Crash /Collision Reports) and a Collision Database System (for Crash
Reports Analysis), like many of our customers, FREE as part of this project These
systems and services are provided in conjunction with our strategic business partner,
Crossroads Software
3. Handheld and LPR System Scofflaw Interface
CdeZONE com services are designed to increase your payment capability We
send multiple notices, including 2 "d and late notices as well as DMV notices and
habitual offender notices We work with our Collection Agency partner to address In-
State and Out -of -State delinquencies Scofflaw Lists are transferred to the Handheld
Computers and License Plate Recognition (LPR) Systems daily for booting and towing
In addition we can participate in a multiple agency LPR Programs for towing among
agencies Photos are also provided with the citation inquiry by your citizens through our
PublicAccessZone com so they are more likely to pay after seeing the photo evidence
This not only increases your payments, it also eliminates costly processing of Reviews
and Hearings, not to mention the added cost of the Hearing Officer
4. Parking Citation Data Entry Fields
DATE OF ISSUE: This field is automatic and cannot be changed or altered in
the field by the PEO The internal real -time clock and calendar are monitored
daily by the Host
9
CiteZONE.Com
TIME OF ISSUE: Military time is used in the and AM /PM are not designated
(Example TIME 13 52) This can be changed to AM /PM (either way is optional)
Time is automatic and cannot be changed or altered in the field by the PEO
CITATION NUMBER: Up to a 9 digit number and 2 digit alpha numeric prefix is
used for the citation number and it is automatically incremented Each PDA has
a unique numbering series so you will not have to order numbers on the citations
This feature avoids the constant problem of monitoring the citation numbers for
re -order so they will never overlap The citation number is issued by the PDA
and cannot be changed or modified by the PEO Each PDA is assigned a range
of citation numbers by the Host PC which eliminates any duplications and
prevents overlapping of ranges (has MOD 7 or MOD 10 check digit capability d
desired)
PO/TO NAME: This field is entered at the beginning of the shift or when the
PDA is issued to another PEO Two persons could use the computer during a
shift and daily reports at the end of the shift would segment the citations issued
by each PEO
PASSWORD: A password must be entered which matches the password table of
names of authorized users of the CZ System
AGENCY: Department designations (DPW or PD) are entered into this field for
issuance designation purposes and later statistical analyses
AREA: This field is alphanumeric and entered at the beginning of the shift or
changed if the beat assignment or area is changed during the shift
(All of the above fields are entered once at the start of the shift and are
automatic thereafter unless they are changed by the PEO.)
VIOLATION LOCATION: Stored tables of lots, streets or locations are used to
make this entry very simple for the PEO, therefore eliminating a consistent
source of errors and the most time consuming field entry The entry routine
separates the location for street and cross street entry
PARKING METER NUMBER: This is an alphanumeric field to enter the meter
number when issuing meter violations A meter location matrix can be used to
automatically cross reference the meter number with the exact location
10
CIteZONE,com
VIOLATIOWDESCRIPTIONIFINE: These three fields on the citation are
entered with minimal keystroke entry by the PEO A violation list, with
corresponding descriptions and fines is stored in the PDA The CZ System can
accommodate multiple violations per citation
VEHICLE LICENSE: When this field is entered, with the state field, stored lists
are automatically searched The PEO must confirm if a scofflaw is loci! The
data entered can be either alpha or numeric Nineteen characters of the VIN
can be entered field d the vehicle has no state plate A blank license file can
also automatically queue up a VIN Field if desired However both the license
and VIN fields may be entered
VEHICLE STATE: This is a programmed field to default to a designated state
(CA) or selected from a list by entering the first letter of another state A stored
table of states provides for automatic entry with minimal keystrokes
EXPIRATION DATE: This field is used for the year of registration of the
vehicle (and DMV codes d required)
PERMIT NUMBER: This is an alphanumeric field used for the parking permit
number (used by some as 4 digits of the VIN)
COLOR: Standard colors are programmed into the PDA for minimal keystroke
entry The actual color can be typed fully into this field if preferred The stored
method allows for easy entry of two colors with dust minimal key strokes
(Example. R for RED and W for WHT)
VEHICLE MAKE: A user specific make list (CHEV, FORD, etc) is programmed
into the PDA to make this a minimal keystroke entry
VEHICLE MODEL: A user specific model (which is make specific) list is
programmed into the PDA to make this a minimal keystroke entry
VIN NUMBER: This is an alphanumeric field used for the full VIN# or dust 4
digits of the VIN# as required in California (or for other data if desired) This
field will be mandatory and automatic if the license field is left blank However
both the VIN and the license fields may be entered
REMARKS: A stored list of the most often used remarks or comments can be
accessed by a minimal keystroke entry Also two or more lines of 40 characters
each are available for free form comments Examples of remarks used by other
clients have been included for your review in the appendices
11
COeZONE.com
COMMENTS or NOTES: A stored list of the most often used comments or
notes can be accessed by a minimal keystroke entry Also two or more lines of
40 characters each are available for free form comments Unlike the
REMARKS these PRIVATE comments or notes DO NOT print on the citation
Examples of remarks used by other clients have been included for your review
in the appendices
S. Citation Electronic Data Transfer
The Automated Citation Issuance System (IssueZONE or Politess)
operates on a WINDOWS based Host PC System, or network Server, for
synchronizing the handhelds A communications program via a Secure FTP
site coordinates the electronic transfer of citation data At the same time a
hotlist file is transmitted back to the handhelds for towing and/or booting
6. Citation Issuance Reports
Reports are executed from the host side PC by choosing the appropriate menu
deco Although not totally inclusive some examples are listed below Other
Issuance or Enforcement Reports can easily be created to match specific agency
requirements
Officer Productivity Report
- Lists activity counts and percentages by officer (summary report)
Officer Log Report
- Lists citations (time /locations/violabons / fines) by Officer / Date
Violation Summary Report
- Lists all violations and associated fines in a summary format
Violation Summary by Officer Report
- Lists citations by issuing officer (and comparison with other officers)
Violation Summary by Area Report
- Lists citations by issuing department / section
Disposition Code Report
- Lists dispositions for vehicles found on the HotUst
Time Limit Marking Report
- Lists vehicles and markings in time limit zones
Broken Meter and Damaged Sign Reports
- Lists broken meters and damaged signs found and locations
12
E. Installation, Tmining and Implementation Schedule
After executing an agreement with the Agency a general meeting will be
scheduled with all of the users and their operational personnel A list of start -up
procedures will be distributed to each department A follow -up meeting will be
scheduled with the Agency to implement the start-up procedures and go over all
documentation and forms This process can be completed within thirty (30) days Very
thorough Installation and Testing Procedures are always implemented once the data
conversion plan has been defined Upon completion all Agency personnel will be
trained prior to going live Once the Agency has executed the Start-Up Letter the
conversion will be completed and the system and services will become operational Our
proposed Implementation Timetable and Schedule can be found below
Timetable for Tasks - Citation Issuance Start Up
WEEKS 1 2 3 4
Executed Contract (starts process) (DAY 1)
1st Priority Assign Agency Project Manager
Start Up Pack to Agency X
(specifications and definitions of required dots)
Agency Information
Agency Tables
User Profiles
Violations Structure
Sample Citation & Envelope Mock Up
Return of the Above X
Citation/Envelope Design
Revisions & Approval of CZ Mock Ups rX
Printer Proof Approved Orders to Printer
Receipt of Form (delivery 2 -3 weeks) X
Handheld Computer System
POs from Agency X X
POs to Suppliers X X
Receipt of Hardware (delivery 2-3 weeks) X
Software Installed X
Agency Training X
Systems Training at Agency X
(coordinated with ate/env receipt)
Start Issuing New Citations X
13
CiteZONE.com
III. REFERENCES and EXPERIENCE
A. CiteZONE.com Client References
As stated numerous times throughout this proposal CiteZONE.com is a new
company founded and operated by former employees of at Enforcement Technology,
Inc (ETEC) and Duncan Solutions CZ was incorporated in 2011 with the mission to
bring a unique approach to the Citation Processing Industry with our Web Based
Citation Processing References for our current clients are listed below
Agency Name City of Bellflower, CA '
Contact Person Joel Hockman
Director of Public Safety
Agency Address 16600 Civic Center Drive
Bellflower, CA 90706
Phone/Email (562) 804 -1424 Ext 2525 - jhockman @bellflower org
Fax (562) 925 -8660
Annual Issuance 30,000 Citations
Description of Services FULL SERVICE Citation Processing
with AutoCITE handheld computers
Agency Name City of Santa Clara, CA
Contact Person Lt Matthew Hogan
Field Operations Commander
Agency Address 601 El Camino Real
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Phone /Email (408) 615 -4754 - mhogan@santaclaraca gov
Annual Issuance 15,000 Citations
Description of Services FULL SERVICE Citation Processing with
3 Motorola handhelds & Zebra printers
for Parking and 6 for Traffic
Agency Name City of Lafayette, CA
Contact Person Cathy Surges - Moscato
Police Services Manager
Agency Address 3675 Mt Diablo Blvd - Suite 130
Lafayette, CA 94549
Phone/Email (925) 299 -3220 - csurges @lovelafayette org
Annual Issuance 15,000 Citations
Description of Services FULL SERVICE Citation Processing with
3 Motorola handhelds & Zebra printers
14
CgeZONE -com
Agency Name City of Maywood, CA
Contact Person Carlos Fernandez
Manager
Agency Address 4319 E Slauson Avenue
Maywood, CA 90970
Phone /Email (323) 562 -5744 carlos femandez @cityofmaywood org
Annual Issuance 10,000 Cons
Description of Services FULL SERVICE Citation Processing
with AutoCITE handheld computers
Agency Name Ventura Port District, CA
Contact Person Mr Scott Miller
Manager
Agency Address 1603 Anchors Way Drive
Ventura, CA 93001
Phone /Email (805) 642 -8538 - smeller @venturaharbor corn
Annual Issuance 1,000 Citations
Description of Services FULL SERVICE Citation Processing
Agency Name City of Santa Paula, CA
Contact Person Sgt Cody Madison
Watch Commander
Agency Address 214 S 1& Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
Phone /Email (805) 525 -4474 - cmadison@spcity org
Annual Issuance 5,000 Citations
Description of Services FULL SERVICE Citation Processing with
6 Motorola handholds & Zebra printers
Agency Name City of Gonzales, CA
Contact Person Paul Miller
Chief of Police
Agency Address 109 Fourth Street
Gonzales, CA 93926
Phone /Email (831) 657 -5010 - pmiller @ci gonzales ca us
Annual Issuance 1,200 Citations
Description of Services FULL SERVICE Citation Processing
City of Marysville, CA Projected Go Live 7/1/13
Description of Services FULL SERVICE Citation Processing
1 Motorola handheld & Zebra printer
City of Asheville, NC Projected Go Live 8/1/13
Description of Services FULL SERVICE Citation Processing with
20 Schweers handheld computers
15
ClteZONE.com
B. Crossroads Software Client References
CiteZONE.com and Crossroads Software have a strategic partnership to
provide Traffic Ticket and Parking Citation Issuance Systems using Motorola
handhelds and Zebra printers Crossroads also has a Traffic Collision Database
System with Traffic Collision Analysis as well as On -Line Reports and Records
Dissemination Systems and Services They can provide all of the handheld interfaces
required of this RFP (Parkeon, GPS, RFID, WiFi and Cell connectivity, etc) In fact
they currently are transmitting traffic tickets from the field via cell using Motorola
handhelds at the Las Vegas Metro Police Department, both to the station and to the
court Metro also has access to wants and warrants on their handhelds Crossroads
has over 100 customers in Arizona, California, Nevada and Washington Mr. Jeff
Cullen is the owner and CEO They are located at 210 W Birch Street, Brea, California
92821 They can be contacted at 714 -990 -6433 References for sic (6) of their
customers located in Nevada and California are listed below
Agency Name Las Vegas Metro Police Department
Contact Person Officer Chuck Burgess
Traffic Division
Agency Address 2300 St Louis Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89104
Phone (702) 828 -8528
Annual Issuance 600,000 Traffic Tickets
Description of Services Traffic Tickets and Traffic Collision Analysis
with 270 Motorola handheld computers &
Zebra printers and Traffic Collision Database System
Agency Name Reno Police Department
Contact Person Office Phil Tuttle
Traffic Division
Agency Address 455 2nd Street
Reno, NV 89502
Phone (775) 334 -2175
Annual Issuance 20,000 Traffic Tickets
Description of Services Traffic Tickets and Traffic Collision Analysis
with 40 Motorola handheld computers &
Zebra printers and Traffic Collision Database System
16
CiteZONE.com
Crossroads Client References Continued:
Agency Name Fresno Police Department
Contact Person Sgt. Rick Tucker
Traffic Division
Agency Address 2326 Fresno Street
Fresno, CA 93721
Phone (559) 621 -5056
Annual Issuance 50,000 Traffic Tickets
Description of Services with 70 Motorola handheld computers &
Zebra printers and Traffic Collision Database System
Agency Name Inglewood Police Department
Contact Person Officer Jeff LaGreek
Traffic Division
Agency Address 1 Manchester Blvd
Inglewood, CA 90301
Phone (310) 412 -5288
Annual Issuance 5,000 Traffic Tickets
Description of Services with 5 Motorola handheld computers &
Zebra printers and Traffic Collision Database System
Agency Name Moreno Valley Police Department
Contact Person Launa Jiminez
Traffic Division
Agency Address 22850 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
Phone (951) 486 -6964
Annual Issuance 25,000 Traffic Tickets
Description of Services with 30 Motorola handheld computers &
Zebra printers and Traffic Collision Database System
Agency Name Sunnyvale Police Department
Contact Person Capt Jeff Hunter
Traffic Division
Agency Address 456 W Olive Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94088
Phone (408) 730 -7157
Annual Issuance 20,000 Traffic Tickets
Description of Services with 20 Motorola handheld computers &
Zebra printers and Traffic Collision Database System
17
CiteZONE.com
C. Schweers Technologies Client References
CiteZONE.com and Schweers Technologies have a strategic partnership to
provide single -unit Parking Citation Issuance Systems using their Politess product line
featuring one-pew handheld computers with built-in printers X600 and Ticketman
They can also provide all of the handheld interfaces required of this RFP (Parkeon,
GPS, RFID, Pay -by- Phone, WFi and Cell connectivity, etc) Schweers has over 1,200
customers World -Wide with over 10,000 handhelds in operation Mr. Michael
Schweers is the owner and CEO Their corporate headquarters is in Germany and
they have USA offices located at 32 Forest Street, Montclair, New Jersey, 07042 They
can be contacted at 973 - 746 -5200 References for three (3) USA customers and three
(3) international customers are listed below
Agency Name City of Portland
Contact Person Marc Friedman
Agency Address 1120 SW a Ave, Rm 702
Portland, OR 97204
Phone (503) 8231209
Email mark i fnedman @pordandoregon gov
Annual Issuance 220 000 Citations
Description of Services Citation issuance using 50 Schweers Ticketman X600
and Poldess Office
Agency Name San Diego County Regional Airport
Contact Person Vito M Cali
Senior Airport Traffic Supervisor
Agency Address P O Box 82776
San Diego, CA 92138
Phone (619) 400 2704
Email vcali @san org
Annual Issuance 150,000 Citations
Description of Services Citation issuance using 50 Schweers Ticketman
TM -06 and Poldess Office
18
CdeZ®NE.com
Schweers Client References Continued:
Agency Name City of Fullerton Police Department
Contact Person Pauline Flanders
Analyst
Agency Address 237 W Commonwealth Ave
Fullerton, CA 92832
Phone (714) 738 6739
Email pflanders@fullertonpd org
Annual Issuance 30,000 Citations
Description of Services Citation issuance using 6 Schweers Ticketman X600
and Poldess Office
Agency Name City of Berlin, Germany
Contact Person Ka%a Raue
Manager
Agency Address Berliner Str 112 -115
10713 Berlin, Germany
Phone +49 30 90222 6715
Email katja raue @itdz -bedin de
Annual Issuance 8,000,000 Citations
Description of Services Citation issuance using 453 Schweers Ticketman
TM -12 and Poldess Office
Agency Name City of Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact Person Hanne Tidemand
Manager
Agency Address Borgergade 24 B
1300 Copenhagen V, Denmark
Phone +45 8232 -9300
Email hantid@tmf -kk dk
Annual Issuance 900,000 Citations
Description of Services Citation issuance using 130 Schweers Ticketman
TM -06 and Polies Office
Agency Name Roads & Transport Authority Dubai, UAE
Contact Person Alaa Husni Abdulrahman
System Analyst
Agency Address P O Box 118899
Dubai, UAE
Phone +9714 290 6106
Email alaa abdulrahman @rta ae
Annual Issuance 500,000 Citations
Description of Services Citation issuance with 230 Schweers Ticketman X600
19
CiteZ®NE.com
IV. PRICE PROPOSAL - City of Bremerton
Motorola /Zebra
#1. Purchase Price Option
Price Qua ntity Price
Handheld Citation issuance System
Motorola MC75A Handheld 1,45000 4 $5,80000
(Bluetooth & Camera)
Zebra RW420 Thermal Printer 61300 4 2,45200
(Bluetooth & Belt Clip)
CdeZONE Issuance Software 2,00000 4 8,00000
3,56300 $16,25200 *"
Systems Maintenance:
Motorola (3 yrs service) 33850 4 $1,35400
Zebra (1 yr warranty / 2 yrs service) 18825 4 75300
CdeZONE Software (3 yrs service) 30000 4 1,200 00
(5 years not available on hardware) $3,30700
* The RW220 with a 2.25" citation is $499.00
#2. Lease Price Option $1501Month X 4 Handhelds = $6001Month
(includes full maintenance and support for 3 or 5 years)
Paper Products:
3" X 6" Thermal Parking Citations 5,000 $ 98000
6" White Parking Envelopes 5,000 43500
SetUp Charges ($75 per plate) 3 22500
$ 1,64000
Additional Accessories
Motorola Single Slot Charger Cradle 1 $ 15250
Four Slot Charger Cradle 1 25350
USB Cable (for sync to PC) 1 1250
Rigid Holster with Clip 1 1899
Zebra Single Unit Charger Cable 1 6525
Shoulder Cary Strap 1 750
** We offer a $1,000.00 trade-in allowance for the 4 AutoCITEs and 1 charter.
Freraht and Taxes are in addition to the above prices
All Prices subject to Chanute until the Order is placed
See Attachment "D" for the Maintenance Lkgreement
20
CReZONE.com
Schweers
#1. Purchase Price Option
Price Quanti Price
Handheld Citation Issuance System
Schweers X600 Handheld Computer 4,220 00 4 $16,88000
with Bluetooth, Color Backlit Display
Touchscreen, Full Keyboard,
Windows CE, 3" Built-In Thermal
Printers & 3MPocel Camera)
MECC Comm /Charger Station 54900 4 2,196 00
( Bluetooth & Belt Clip)
Politess Citation Issuance Software 48200 4 1,92800
5,25100 $ 21,004 00
_Systems Maintenance and Support:
(for the 4 unit system)
Service and Support and License 760 OO /Month
Web Service & Support Service 140 00 /Month
Politess Web Office 180 OO /Month
Schweers Transfer Service 120 00/Month
#2. Lease Price Option $753.42[Month for the 4 unit System (3 or 5 years)
Systems Maintenance and Support Same as with the Purchase
(for the 4 unit system)
Installation and Training $1,040 /Day
Paper Products:
3" X 6" Thermal Parking Citations 5,000 $ 98000
6" White Parking Envelopes 5,000 43500
SetUp Charges ($75 per plate) 3 22500
$ 1,64000
Freight and Taxes are in addition to the above prices
All Prices subject to Change until the Order is placed
21
CIteZONE.com
SUMMARY
Why choose CiteZONE.com?
WWONE.com would like to thank the City of Bremerton for your interest in our
company and giving us the opportunity to provide this proposal As a public agency
service center vendor for over thirty (30) years we are very comfortable with
requirements very similar to those presented by the city Our background in software
design and development, manufacturing of handheld computer systems and citation
processing experience makes us uniquely qualified to accomplish all the requirements
in the RFP Collectively, along with our strategic partners, we bring over one hundred
(100) years of issuance and processing experience at over 2,000 agencies with over
10,000 employees issuing and processing over 100,000,000 million citations
annually We can offer you a collection of services that NO other vendor can
provide. As you have questions concerning any portion of this proposal please don't
hesitate to contact us
Gary E. Ward, Ph.D.
Chairman
22
CdeZONE.com
Attachment "A"
HANDHELD CITATION ISSUANCE SYSTEM
Specfcations
Motorola MC75A Handheld Computers
Zebra RW420/220 & GK420 Printers
Schweers Ticketman (one - piece) Handheld Computers
PRODUCT SPEC SHEET
MC75A SERIES
ID
r I
�® ® -
CM 9 Oe e r e
MCWN BE FD 1
PRFMI M, 3 5G APYORLD !)QE ENTESPSISE DIGITAL ASSISTANT (EDA)
THE NEXT EVOLUTION IN EDA POWER
Motorola s MC75A Series takes its place as one of the world s premier EDAs offering more enterprise-
class features and functionality than any other device in its class Turbocharged with many Motorola
Mobility Architecture eXtenslon (MAX) features, the MC75A addresses top business mobility needs,
offering maximum processing power, rugged design, flexibility In extending solution reach data capture
capabilities, connectivity options, security and manageability Three models meet the needs of every
worker a WLAN -only model for workers inside the four walls a WLAN model designed to meet the
special needs In healthcare environments, and a 3 5G WWAN/WLAN model for your field workforce
Add a field proven ergonomic design that is easy -to -hold easy -to -cant' and easy -to -use, and you have
maximum value In a minimum footprint — all at the right price
MAXIMUM POWER response times improved productivity and decision- making
The MC75A offers the most robust processing platform in the — as well as increased customer service satisfaction and
EDA class today from operating system to memory andutec m retention
including Microsoft Windows Mobile 6 5 a PXA320 processor with Motorola MAX Locate for more robust location -based
806 MHz of blazing speed and 256 MB RAM/16B Rash with a user applications. Integrated aGPS /GPS technology opens up a
accessible microSD slot to accommodate up to 32GB of additional PP
mcorporate
storage As a result, the MC75A delivers consistent deslc[op-Irke world of possible location -based applications —
perfomiance regardless of whether your apple ations including real time navigation better fleet management
high resolution rodeo, documents and images or you need thick the ability to geostamp a photo for proof of condition or capture
client applications coordinates for proof of delivery in transportation and logistics
or proof of service for inspections and maintenance The best -
MOTOROLA'S MOST RUGGED EDA in class implementation includes the ScRFstarlll GSC3f /LP GPS
With Motorola MAX Rugged you can count on reliable operation chipset for robust coverage even in challenging urban canyons
inside and outside the enterprise — the MC75A meets or and areas of dense foliage providing more users with location -
exceeds MIL -STD 810G requirements for stress (drop) testing as based services in more areas And the low -power chipset
well as IEC specifications for tumble and sealing The MC75A is delivers top -notch accuracy with minimal power requirements
built to survive drops to concrete from as high as 5 ftJ152 m conserving battery power
Motorola s tumble drum test proves that the device can endure Enterpnse -class motion sensing wide Motorola MAX
1000 consecutive 16 ft / 5 m tumbles (2,000 hits) — and still Sensor MAX Sensor enables business -class implementation
deliver dependable performance And the IP54 sealing rating of one of the most popular consumer style cellular phone
enables use in dusty environments and exposure to rain or spills technologies m the MC75A on the accelerometer In addition to
The result is a dramatic ruction in repair merits and the typical ability to automatically switch between portrait and
downtime providing a strong return on asseet t (RO ROA) landscape display based on the orientation of the device, marry
In addition the disinfectant ready MC75A Series helps prevent additional features can be enabled in seconds right out of the
the spread of germs to patients and caregivers in a hospital as box. Power management features help ensure full shift battery
well as shaft workers in other industries who share devices All power for example the device can automatically revert to
models can be sanitized with many common cleansers without sleep mode if movement is not detected in a specified period of
harming the plastics or the sensitive scanning components. time, or if the display is face down The ability to detect and log
drops helps increase worker accountability for device condition
MAXIMUM FLEXIBILITY And the open architecture allows enterprises to integrate the
The MC75A offers a level of flexibility that puts it in a class of accelerometer data into customized applications that can help
its own with a feature set that includes marry Motorola- unique improve the safety of field service technicians working in remote
capabilities areas and prevent device theft
The only EDA to offer five keypads. Numeric OWERTY DSD MAXData Capture for maximum business functionality
AZERTY and DWERTZ keypads enable maximum data erit y The MC75A captures virtually any type of data and performs
almost any business function streamlining and reducing
simplicity for virtually any application anywtnere m the world almost
in your business processes As the inventor of bar code
Enterprises can standardize an a single device for many different scanning Motorola offers unparalleled 1 D and 2D scanning
workgroups with different application needs, sinnpldyug the technology The SE950 scan engine provides best in -class 10
mobility architecture as well as reducing framing arid support costs bar code scanning performance while the SE4500 Motorola s
Motorola Integrated Voice Solutions unparalleled revolutionary imager engine delivers equally stunning performance
integrated voice interoperability Inside the four walls on 1 D and 2D bar codes Two options provide the flexibility
different workgroups often require different types of devices to address your unique bar code requirements For 1 D or 2D
that run on different networks — from mobile computers and intensive applications and maximum reading distance choose
VoWLAN devices to two-way radios The result is islands of the SR4500 -SR For 1D and 2D intensive applications with
voice — the inability for cross - communications between device smaller and high density bar codes including those found on
families The MC75A eliminates this issue The integrated TEAM some drivers licenses choose the SR4500 -DL In addition the
Express voice client enables push -to talk instant communications SE4500 offers omni- directional scanning eliminating the need
with other TEAM Express - enabled Motorola mobile computers to align bar code and scanner and providing the intelligence
TEAM smartphones and two -way radios (Radio Link Server to capture even damaged and poor quality bar codes The
required) With powerful and highly cost - effective one - to-one integrated 3 2 megapixel autofocus color flash enabled camera
and one to many voice communications between all workers enables the easy capture of high - resolution photographs video
inside the four walls the enterprise enjoys lightning fast footage and documents — complete with legible fine print
z
MOTOROLA'S
MAXIMUM ► TURES ... MAXIMUM FUNCTIONALITY ► ►
Powerful microprocessor designed for raduldr PXA320 Sit 006 MHz
Desktop -like multimedia performance optimized for IoW sluff Irfe
MicrosofCs latest operating system Windows@ Mobde® 6.5
Increased interoperability with existing enterprise infrastructure enhanced security features more flexible development platform
Maximum improved mobile messaging collaboration
power nliMB RAM/1G13 (flash
Provides memory space required to enable robust performance for database applications
User accessible microSD card slot
Provides additional memory and expandable functionality up to 32GB
Maximum Motorola MAX Rugged Industry- leading drop tumble and seabog spectficahons with a disudectant -ready housing
rugged deal gn Lightweight yet rugged built for year -round use in nearly any environment can be sanitized with many common cleansers to prevent the spread of germs as
well as enable cleaning if the device is exposed to dust, dirt, grease spills and more
3.513 WWAN GSM HSDPA or COMA-MO Rev A broadband connectivity over the cellular network
Hugh performance wireless broadband voice and data airy vice m the world_ connection to most carvers in the world with one platform best in lass cellular
broadband throughput integrated voice and data services allows workers to conduct a phone call while maintaining a data correction (where supported by
carrier) internal WWAN diversity antenna provides better signal reception and a more dependable connection
Maximum
connectivity WLAN 802. 11a/ b/ g td-mode radimcomprehemoveUPsupport
Options — Cost - effective voice and data connectivity in the office and hot spots 8021la enables segmentation of voice traffic to protect voice quality
and wireless WPAN Bluetooth® v2.1 with EDRY
performance Wireless connectivity to moderns printers headsets and more additional profiles for expanded connectivity to more device types with either Microsoft or
Stonestreet stacks v21 simplifies pairing, improves security and reduces power consumption
IrDA
Wireless connectivity to legacy printers and other business equipment
Motorola MAX MP& Mobility Platform Architecture 20
Provides the latest best i"lass tedmalogy arutu Lecture preserves existing application investments by enabling easy and cost - effective porting of applications
from other Motorola mobile computers
Maximum Comprehensive centralized device management
manageability Compatibility with Motorola Mobility Services Platform (MSP) and Motorola Mobility Suite provides superior centralized and remote management of all devices
anywhere in the word — from a single console
Motorola MAX Secure
Maximum FIPS 140 2 certification and support for the most advanced encryption and authentication algorithms as well as Virtual Private Networks (VPNS) enables
compliance with the most stringent industry secunty regulatio s mnduding sensibve government applications
security
Motorola MAX Data Capture multi -mode data capture via a bar rode scanner plus a color camera
Ability to capture high quality pictures documents and agnatiues as well as 1D and 2D bar codes in a single device improves workforce automation increases
productivity and reduces data errors
Motorola MAX Sensor
Enterprise -class Interactive Sensor Technology (IST) enables lead'mg edge motion-based applications including dynamic screen orientation porter management
and free -fall event logging
Motorola MAX Locate: SiRFstadfl GSC3eKP GPS cbipset
Integrated autonomous and assisted GPS support for mbust locatim -based application: high performance power efficient processor capable of acquiring and
maintaining a signal lock in areas where signals are typw0y weak. expanding the coverage area for GPS applications faster time to first fix (TTFFt operates in ether
standalone or assisted GPS (aGPS) mode (tamer depended) for faster and more accurate positioning
Maximum Multiple keyboard options: Numenc, ITWEITrY, DSD GWER7Z and AZERTY
flexibility Flexibility to meet diverse user and applcatwn needs
Multiple voice modes. handset headset and speakerphone
Flexibility to use the right made at the right time high quality speaker microphone and receiver provide superior voice quality and performance
3.5 inch color high definition VGA display (640 x 480) with the latest in LCO technology
Easy to view in any lighting, supports display of high resolution images including video and maps
Backwards compatible wdh MC70 and MC75 accessones
Provides investment protection for existing investments
Comprehensive accessory suite
Add-on functionality expands solution reach, protects investment and maximizes TCD — mtm accessory ecosystem offers the ability to read debit and credit
cards around the world hands free scanning RFID and more
5
MC75A SERIES SPECIFICATIONS CHART
PHY SICAL CHARACTERISTICS �- Note. Performance mettles above were measured vath Battery resew option
- - - - -- - set the highest (72 hours)
Duttensams 6 m. L• x 3 3 in W x 17 in 0
1524cmL•xB4anWx44tmD WIREL WAN DATA AND VO COMMUNICAT
` _
Weight (incluft WWAN standard 15X battery 14 9 oz /423 g WWAN Radio -- GSM HSDPA COMA EVDO Rely A
standard batteryk W(AN standard 15X batter(14 ozJ398 g GPS Integrated. Autonomous and Assorted-GPS (A GFS)
Display - +- -- T Trans0ective color 35" full VGA vinth backlight -_ _ Stlll GSC chhp set r
_ 64 0x 480 _ WIRELESS LAN DATA AND VOICE COM MUNICATIONS
Touch Panel. Glass analog resistive touch WLAN Rad Tn4rm IE EE° MZtta/b/9 _ --
BackhghL LED backlight Data Rates Supported 1 2 5.5,6.9 12 18 24 36 48 and 54 Mbps
Main Battery Reebargeable Lithium Ion 3.7V 36M mAh Smart Battery Operating Channels Chan B-1651150 MHz)
Ext Cap BOW -- Optional 3 7V 4800 mAh Siren Battery - - Chan 113 (1412 2472 MHz)
accessi
ts( Ni-MH battery (rechargeable)15mAh 2 4V Chan l opera m channeW only
Backup Bat
(riot user accessible) Actual 0�9 ufianr�s/fre4Ueoies dew on
_ _ _ _ regulatory o des and certification agency
Expansion Slat mncroSO slat vwlhSDHC Support (up to3260) Security WPAZWEP1 4Dor128briTKIP TLS, TILS(MSOIAP1
Network Comtech= Ethernet (via rxadlet full -speed USB host or client T RS (t W %% TRS (CM TTL&MI35.1TlSPAP
Notification. - - - Vibrator and LED -- - - - - PEAP TLS. PEAP IMS*W v21. AES LEAP CC(v4
_ certified RPS 140 -2 certified _
Keypad Options: Numenc OWERTY DSD AZERTW OWERTZ Spreading Technique Ouect Sequence Spread Spectrum (OSSS) and
Audio VoWWAfrk VhWIAN TEAM Express compliant Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFOM)
support for weed and wialess (Bluetooth) headsets Antenna Internal for LAN External for WAN - - --
h eadset handset an d speaker phone modes _ _ _ _ _ _ _
PERFORM CH ARACTER ISTICS _ Voice Communication Integrated Voice- over4P ready (P2P PBX. FM
_ Wi- W- cemfied IEEE 80211a/b/g direct sequence
CPU - PXA320 @ 806 MHz processor -^ _ wireless LAN Operating System: Microsoft' Windows Mobd9 6 5 Classic WIRELESS P DATA AN D V OICE COM _
- _ and Professional _ Bluetooth Class 11 t/ L1 with Enhanced Data Rate (EDR)
Memorf - - - 256MB RAM IGO Flash - - - _ - integrated ad�n
Interf R - S 232 USB 11 _ _ _ _ DATA CAPTUR OPTIONS
User Eenronment - - - Five Configuration Standard model available in four configurations
Operatug Tmmperamro ^ 14° F to 122° F/ 1(° C to 50° C� - - -- - Options 10 laser scarcer 2D imager 1D laser scanner and
to -40° F 158° F/ 40° C to ° 70 _C_(w /o battery) camera. re u camera
Storage Temperature
_ _ _ Healthcare model p1AC75WC1 configured with 2D
Humidity 95% on cmdensmg onagK 32 MP tamers. OWERfY keypad and
Drop Specification Multiple 5 IL drops to concrete at room temperature _ ___ WLAN/WPAN ( W WAN)
Multiple 4 ft drops to concrete across the C C AMER A - -
operating temperature range meets and Resolution l_ 32 megapael
excee appl icable M ST D 810G specifications _- - - - — - - - - -- - - --
Tumble Specification - 1.00016 ftJ 5 in tumbles (2 000 drops) per -- Illumination User corrorollahleirash -
applicable IEC tumble specifications Lens -^� Auer focus
Sealing IP54 per applicable IEC sealing specifications 1 LAS SCANNER SES50
IrOA. Infra -red port for connection to printers and Range on 100% UPCA 24 mJ60 cm
other devices _ _ Resolution _ 4 Md n mimum element width _
Cock. - --- Integrated real time clock _ Roll - - - t35° from vertical -- - - -
Light Immunity Readability Incandescent - 450 It candles Pitch Angle t 65° from normal - -
Suidight -8000 fl. emdIn Flumescent 450 ft candles _ _ - - - - -- - - - --
Electrostatic t15W air discharge ±8kV direct discharge Skew Tolerance t 50° from tiers) -
Oischarge (ESO): _ Ambient Light Immunity 10 OW fL eandles/IO7 640 tux - -
BATTERY Scan Rate 104 W 121 scans/see(br- directrahal)
Standby time 150 hours T- -- Scan Angle - �47° t 3° default 3 t 3° re&tce
Talk tam 5houts _ 2O IM AGER ENGIN SE4 -SR
User profiles~ Outdoor WANDS 15mm/how voice communication, Focal Distance - From center of eat widow SR - 7 5 mJ19 cm
10k6 transmission every 10 min and GPS on all Sensor Resolution 752 x 480 pixels
tune 8 hours of operation - - - -- - - - - - - -- __ _ _
Outdoor Voice 15 nun/hour voice communication Field of View Honwritak 40' Vertical 25° -
8 hours of operation and 75 hours standby time
for WAN mn* pauw ,%add lot demnemw -_ -
B
Skew Tolerance t60° CORM EV00 Rev A. Venzon and Sprint
-- -- - - IFor the latest information contact your local
Pitch Tolerance t60° Motorola representative)
Roll Tolerance 360° _ RF Exposum USA, FCC Part 2 FCC OEF Bulletin 65 Supplement C
Ambient Light Immunity 9 000 It candles/96 900 lux Canada: RSS -102
Aimmg LED (VLDk 655 t 10 nm Laser Elk EN 50360
_ -_ _ _ _ _ -- _ _ _ Am>straRa Radiocemmumcations Standard 2003
Iilummatro (LE 625t 5 nm LEDs 12 - -
EMVRfl North America FCC Part 15 Class B
20 I MAGER ENGINE SE4500 OL ^v _— Canada ICES 003 Class B
Focal Distance From center of exit window SR - 5 mJi3 an� ELP EN55022 Class B EN 301489.1 EN 301489 3
nc
EN 3014&9.7 EN 301489.17 EN 301489 24
Sensor Resolution 752 x 480 pixels _ EN 6060112
Field of View - - Horizontal 33 Vertical 25° Austrahar AS /NZS CISPRA 22 --
Skew Tolerance t60° Laser Safety IEC Class2/FDA Class II in accordance with
-- - - -- - - - - - IEC60825.1/EN60825 -1
Pitch Tolerance t6O - - - - - -- - - - - - -
- - - For countries outside USA Canada European Economic Area Japan or
Roll Tolerance 360° Australia cons your lo cal Motorola repres —
Ambient Light Immunity 9 000 It candles/96 900 lux _ _ HA ZARDOUS LO CERTIFICATIONS
Aimmg LED (VLD) 655 t 10 rim Laser UL Class 18 III Division 2 Groups A B C D F G (Select Configuration Only)
Ol ummation Element (LEDk 625 15 rim LEDs (2x _ - W ARRANT Y
MOTORO INT ERACTIVE SENSOR TECHN ry15ASeriresis warranted against defects in workmanship and ~�
The Motion sensor 3-axis accelerometer that enables motion - sensing applmca- materials for a period of 12 months from date of shipment provided
trans for dynamic screen orientation powe ma nagement and free -fall detec that the product remains unmodified and is operated under normal and
PERIPHER AND ACC ESSORIES p- - - Pe - ' - ' D - 'dd - ' - O - "s '
Commanicatron and Serial and USB vi t charging cables printer cables The MC75A Series is a true global product that is supported in all industrial
Charging fables vehicle charging cable power /charging cable countries, please visit www.mowrol&com for a complete list of supported
-- -- _ _ ceunti es.
Battery Chargers 4-slot battery charger 11X,15X and 2 5Xk
universal battery charger (requires adapters for
1K 15X and 2 5X capacity batteries) Approved Cleanser 100% of the active ingredients in any cleaner must
Snap Magnetic Stn Reader (MSRk Payment Active Ingredients consist of one or some combination of the
Vertical-specific;
P Pe following isopropyl alcohol bleach/sodium
attachments Snap-on (Debit and Credilk Mobile Payment Module; trypochlonte hydrogen peroxide, mild dish soap
Mobile Payment Module with Chip and PIN
cal Safety Certified to UL / cUL 60950 -i IEC / EN609%1 dui The following the MC75A are known to damage
Electri
_ _ _ _ the plastics on the MC75A Series and should not
EMI/RFI USA FCC Part 15 Canada ICES 003 Class 8 come in contact with the device ammonia
Europe EN55022 Class B EN 55024 EN60601 12 solutions compounds of ammes or ammoma
Australia AS /NZS CISPRA 22 acetone ketones ethers aromatic and chlonnated
hydroc
For countries outside USA Canada European Economic Area Japan or solutio us or alcohols alka
eth nolarm
Australia consult your local Motorola representative for a complete list of benzen e ca rbolic toluene tnchior
hylene
MC75A Peripherals and Accessories please visit bacteria carbolic acid T lys
www motorola com/mc75a or www motorola c Cleamng Instructions Do not apply liquid directly to the MC75A Series.
REGULATORY u- V - -� Dampen a soft cloth or use pre - moistened wipes
_ _ _ -/c Do not wrap the device in the cloth or wipe but
El_ectrical Safety Certified to UL I _ L 60950_ 950
1 IEC - /E N60-i ~ gently vnpe the unit. Be careful not to let liquid
Environmental RoHStoniphant _ - pool around the display window or other places
Allow the unit to air dry be use
WLAN and Biueto0th USA. FCC Part 15.247 15 407
Canada RSS 210 Special Cleaning Many vinyl gloves contain phthalate additives
Notm which are often not recommended for medical
EU EN 300 328 EN 301893
EU EN use and are known to be harmful to the housing
Japan: A A RIB S STD N 3 189 TO T 4268 STD T66 ARIB STD - T711 of the MC75A Series The MG75ASeries should
_ not be handled while wearing virryi gloves
Quad Band GSM/ Global 3GPP TS 51010 3GPP TS 34121 containing phthalates or before hands are
EDGE plus Tri band 36PP TS 34123 GCF approved module washed to remove contaminant residue after
HSDPA USA. FCC Part 22 Part 24 gloves are removed
Canada RSS 132 RSS 133
EU EN301511 EN301908 If products containing any of the harmful
Australia AS /ACIF SO421 &3 ingredients listed above are used prior to handling
- - - the MC75A Series such as hand sanitaers that
contain ethanolamme hands must be completely
dry before handling the MC75A Series to prevent
damage to the plastics
7
Zebrag RWTM Series
v
s ,
J 1 '
t I ~
e
f
r
°n° 'OwmsB7�11
r
1
Wireless Printers Add Versatility to Printing Tasks on v `
the Open Road
Designed for the Road Warrior the Zebra RW series of mobile
printers are ideal for printing delivery receipts and invoices on
the go The modular design allows users to choose among Resilient and lightweight these
IP54certified punters can withstand
wireless options, card readers, and Integral accessories such as the harsh demands of a number of
vehicle mounts for simplified route printing Easy - access vehicle route accounting and field service
mounting cradles and charging options as well as user - intuitive printing applications including
Interfaces and angled displays enhance the convenience and . Invokes
simplicity of mobile printing
Delivery receipts
Rough and Ready Durability for Reliable Printing • Service estimates
Uniquely designed for harsh outdoor environments RW series . Sales orders
mobile printers endure extreme temperatures and weather
conditions Bounce it In the truck carry it In the rain, drop it to • Inventory management
the pavement, and expect the same performance day in and • Mobile point -of -sale
day out • DEx•
DEX eommumcaoon for Duect Store Delivery (U.S. only)
111111 IN 111111 i t I II IIIII IIIII IIIII 111111 IIIII IIIII ill) IIIII IIIII 111111 II 1111111 IIIII 111111 II I IIIIIIIli) IIIIIIIIII11111111111IIIII11111111 111111111111
Zebra RW Series Printers
X�
RW 220° RW 420'"
Meet the RW Series'
The RW series rugged enough for the
Road Warnor
With the most feature -rich offering of r
any mobile printer in the market r t�
Rugged and Easy to Use Printer
• IP54 certified for resistance to
windblown water and dust
• Damage - resistant to multiple drops
of up to 6 feet to concrete
• Weight of 1 1/2 to 2 pounds for The user friendly 2-inch RW 220 simplifies printing tasks Neither wind nor rain nor harsh temperatures can keep
effortless mobility for the mobile workforce with intuitive interfaces rugged the RW 420 from delivering high - quality 41nch receipts
construction and reliable printing and tickets
• Resistant to extreme hot and cold
temperatures Maximum Print Area Maximum Print Area
Width – Width
Ergonomically Designed to Fit 2 20 /56 mm 4 09 /104 mm
Comfortably on the Hip Length Len
Continuous Continuous
• Single push -button media access
for simple re- loading Resolution Resolution
• Angled LCD for easy viewing of 203 dpi/8 dots per mm 203 dpi/8 dots per mm
printer status comes standard
Maximum Pant Speed Maximum Print Speed
Smart and Sophisticated operation 3776 2 mm per second maximum 3"76 2 mm per second maximum
• Print using the same commands Physical Characteristics
as your Zebra tabletop or desktop Physical Characteristics Y
printers with common language Base version Base version
support
Width 4 4 /112 mm •Width 6 3'/160 mm
• Depth 29'/74 mm Depth 3 0'/76 mm
• Choose the wireless connectivity Height 6 6'/173 mm • Height 6 9 /175 mm
module that suits your needs • Weight 1 45 IbsJ658 g •Weight 2 00 Ibs 907 g
802 11b /g Bluetooth 2 0 dual radio Card Reader Version Card Reader Version
support using BluetoothO and • Width 4 4 /112 mm •Width 6 3 /160 mm
WLAN in the same printer • Depth 3 2181 2 mm • Depth 31 !79 mm
(RW 420 Only) • Height 6 8'/173 mm • Height 6 9 /175 mm
Weight 1 55lbsJ703 g • Weight 2 15 lbs / 975 g
• Ouickiy and easily print complex
labels symbologies and graphics Media Specifications
thanks to the RW series' fast Media width Media Specifications
processor and large memory 1 /25 mm to 2 37 /60 mm Media width
2 /51 mm to 4 1 Y /105 mm standard
1111 IIII 111111 IIII 1111111111 IIIII Illlll IIIII Ilill ilia illilllill IIli1
111111 IIIII 111111 IIII 111111 IIII IIIII IIIII IIIII Illlll IIIII IIIII IIII IIIII IIIII 111111 II 1111111 IIIII II
Specifications at a Glance*
Applications
Print Characteristics Networlung and Connectivity
• Print method Direct thermal • Bluetoothe v 2 0
• Resolution 203 dpi/8 dots per mm 80211big Zebra Performance Radio Route Accounting
• Maximum print speed 3 /76 2 mm per second • Native wireless security support VPN WPAIWPA2 Delivery Verification
WEP Kerberos WPA PSK EARTLS EAP-TTLS EAFL Slips —Use an RW
FAST LEAP PEAP 802111 series printer at the
Memory • RW 420 can be configured with dual radios (Bluetooth point of transaction to
8 MB Flash 16 MB RAM and WLAN) print a delivery receipt
Firmware that confirms the
• Wevelmk Avalanche actual quantities that
Physical Characteristics • Motorola° MSP transferred possession
6
• Construction Impact - modified polycarbonate • Native CPCL with ZPL' EPL " and XML support t
abrasion resistant rubber overmold (standard) Invoices
• Drop specification 6-foot multiple drops to concrete Take days off your
• LCD Ergonomic angled display for better viewing Media Characteristics billing cydel Using
Strain relief RS 232 serial interface mobile computers and printers to Issue invoices at
• Fanfold slot for accepting external media (RW 420 only) • Max Roll Size 10 D ► 2 25 /57 mm the time of delivery accelerates the payment Process
• Self - centering media holders • Max. Media Width (RW 420) 4 12•/105 mm eliminating the need for manual data entry and billing
• IP54- certified • Max Media Width (RW 220) 2 37/60 mm in the office
• I D core 75 /19 mm or 1 38'/ 34 9 mm
• Thickness 002 / 05 mm to 0063 / 16 mm Field Service
Standard Features • Media Types direct thermal tags or receipt paper
Service Estimates
• Rugged design synthetic media UV coated media limited label
support Offer customers c rr
• 4 button angled LCD (standard) documented
• Standard serial and USB interfaces information regarding _
• Advanced 32 bit architecture for high-speed processing For optimum print quality and printer performance use the estimate that was
• Enhanced battery management genuine Zebra supplies quoted This estimate
is entered into the
Fonts /Graphics /Symbolo ies system in real time and ,
Operating Characteristics g can be easily accessed
Environment" Fonts and Character Sets when the customer �` Y
• Meets IP54 certification • Standard fonts' 25 bitmapped 1 smooth scalable (CG calls in using the
•Operating Temp .i° F1 -20° C to 131° F/55° C Triumvirate " Bold Condensed) contact information and
• Optional fonts downloadable bitmapped and estimate number that is indicated on the printout
• Storage/Environ -22° F /30° C to 149° F/65° C scalable fonts
• Operating Humidity 10-90% non - condensing • International character sets (optional) Chinese 16
a Humidity 10-90% non-condensing Retail
• Stora
9 Y 9 x 16 (tiadl 16 x 16 (simplified) 24 x 24 (simplified) Mobile Point of Sale/Queue Busting
Electrical Japanese 16 x 16 24 x 24 Hebrew /Arabic
• Standard 4 0 Ah 7 4V battery (RW 420) Graphic Features Watch sales and satisfaction improve when you offer
mobile point -of sale service for line- or queue-busting
• Standard 2 0 Ah 7 4V battery (RW 220) Supports user- defined fonts and graphics— featuring Zebra printers with integrated card readers
External charging options (vehicle and AC) including custom logos and wireless network connectivity
• Shock mounted internal components Bar Code Symbologies
• Selectable baud rate 9600 to 115 2 Kbps • Linear Bar Codes Code 39 Code 93 UCC /EAN -128
• Xon/Xoff or hardware flow control (RTS /CTS) EAN-14 Code 128 UPC A UPC E EAN -8 EAN 13 Transportation
• USB 2 0 full speed support 12 Mbits/second (for setup EAN - 14 UPC and EAN 2 of digital extensions Ticketing /Passenger Information
and configuration) Plessey AM Postnet Interleaved 2-of -5 MSI Codabar Print tickets or passenger information aboard buses
RS 232C serial port (RJ45 connector) for cabled use • 2- Dimensional Aztec Data Matrix GS1 DataBar " trains or boats for an efficient way of reducing lines
Regulatory (RSSI family (12 bar codes) MaxiCode PDF417 OR and increasing customer satisfaction
FCC Part 15 Class B VCCI Class B NOM/NYCE CE Code
compliance (Class B) C Tick CSA canta°vs UFST horn Motietype linaulty lilt Public Safety /Law Enforcement
Zebralink Solutions Options and Accessories Citations
Software • Magnetic stripe reader and EMV certified smart card Improve safety
• ZebraDesigner " Pro reader enforceability and
• Zebra Mobile SDK • Lithium Ion Fast AC Charger efficiency with
• ZebraNet " Bridge Enterprise • Lithium Ion Quad Charger electronic citation
9 systems that are easy to
• Zebra Universal Driver • Cigarette lighter charger (for 1n- vehicle charging) use and tough to beat.
• Label Vista • Vehicle cradle for docking and charging
• Auto - detect firmware load • RW 420 4 -Bay Power Station
• Battery management (monitors battery for longer life • Ram Mount Kit
and performance) • Route Palette (RW 420 only)
• Shoulder Strap/Hand Strap
• Environmental Soft Case
• Fanfold media support (RW 420 only)
• Linedess label support (RW 420 only)
• XML Support Applications and Documentation
utility CO
1 1111111 IIIII 111111 IN 111111 IIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII 11111 IIIII 1111 IIIII 11111111111 II 111
111111111111111II 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111Bill11
Mobile A to Z
From Accessories, to Supplies, to ZebraCare' Plans
Vehicle Cradles RW 420 4 -Bay Power Station RW 420 Battery Oiminator
RW 4M cmdb Ideal for users If you keep and use your printer In the
Intuitive push- button who prefer cab — fixed- mounted and powered by
release cradle for :.q to dock and your vehicle s power system Instead
convenient storage and go At the of the printer s battery—look to the
charging of the printer end of your ; RW 420 Battery Eliminator to reduce
while in a vehicle shift, simply your cost of owning the RW 420
Fanfold media can be slide up to printer
fed through the base of the cradle four RW 420 printers Into this power
to extend the media capacity of the station for simultaneous charging Lithium -Ion Batteries
printer Designed to meet the SAE Lithium -Ion (LI-lon) cells represent the
J1113 -11 International Automotive Carriers latest In mobile battery technology
Standards RW 420 Route Palette They offer higher power -to- volume
RW 220 cradle RW 420 Route and power- to-weight than their nickel
Grab your printer Palette provides rn1T� metal hydride and nickel cadmium
and gol Store your a single 1 counterparts Order spare Li-Ion
compact printer convenient batteries for your RW series printer to
conveniently in the carrier for Zebra's guarantee you'll always be charged up
vehicle and release it rugged RW 420 ' and ready to gol
Instantly to take to the mobile Pinter
customer with a push and your choice ZebraCare Depot Service Agreements
of a lever Flexible Ram Mounting kits of Motorola's MC9590/MC9596/ A ZebraCare Depot service agreement
are also available for mounting the MC9598 MC9094/MC9097 MC75 or is a cost - effective means e
cradles In convenient orientations MC70 mobile computer Designed to of
meet the SAE J1113 -11 International planning and budgeting your annual
Cases Automotive Standards maintenance expenditures This
Add dust and rain back-to-factory service ensures that
trained and certified Zebra technicians
protection to your Lithium -Ion Chargers will bring your printer back to factory
RW series mobile Fast Charger specifications every time Zebra offers
printer with an
environmental Charges a single RW 220 battery in four plans to meet your
case By adding an 3-4 hours and an RW 420 battery in specific needs
extra layer of protection your printer 5-7 hours
will be well prepared for the harshest Guad Charger Mobile Media
conditions Charges up to 4 Zebra Li-lon batteries Ensure high - quality, crisp Images
RJ45 Cable at a time In approximately 2 -5 hours and text and that your receipts and
DC /OC vehicle charger with cigarette lighter adapter documents remain readable and
For wired communications, Zebra intact for their entire life by choosing
recommends using a serial Plug the printer into your vehicles genuine Zebra'" supplies Zebra
RJ -45 cable for connection with our cigarette lighter adapter for
y convenient charging on the go offers materials that have been tested
RW printer's RS -232C serial port A g g and approved by Zebra Supplies
USB to RJ-45 cable is also available R&D to meet the durability image
for USB cabled file transfers The RW quality and archival requirements of
series USB port Is intended for setup your application and budget We can
and maintenance of the printer only also pre -print your company logo
Instructions terms and conditions
and other information allowing you
specticatwms subject to change without notice Extremes in temperature and label image density may affect thro and time image to maximize the functionality of your
cruelty Please contact Zebra for guidance to maumue the performance of your solution 02011 ZIH Corp ZebraCare and an product names and receipts and documents
numbers one Zebra trademarks and Zebra and tine Zebra head gnapluc are registered oddernanks of ZIH Corp All rights reserved etuetooth is a
registered trademark of eluelooth SIG ktc. Windows is either a registered trademark or trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the touted States
and/or other countries CG Trio rate and UFST are trademarks of Monotype Imaging Inc. and may be registered in certain lunsdctros. GSl
Datatlar is a trademark of GSl U brie Wavalurk Avalanche is a registered trademark of Waveli nk Corporatrorn Motaola is a trademark of Motorola
Inc registered in the US Patent 0 Trodemark Oflrcc All other trademarks arc the propery of their respective owners
Corporate Headquarters Asia Pacific Headquarters EMEA Headquarters Latin America Headquarters
+1800 423 0442 +65 6858 0722 +44 (0)1628 556000 +1847 955 2283
Email inqulry4@zebra com Email apacchannelmarketing @zebra com Email mseurope@zebra com Email inquiry4 @zebra com
Other Locations
USA California Georgia Illinois Rhode Island Texas Wisconsin Europe France Germany Italy the Netherlands Poland Spain Sweden Turkey
United Kingdom Asia Pacific Australia China Hong Kong India Japan Malaysia South Korea Singapore Thailand Latin America Brazil Flonda
www.zebraeom (LA Headquarters in USA( Mexico Afnca/Middle East Dubai South Africa GS" GS
P1026290 Rev 4 (6/11)
111111 IIIII 111111 III 111111 IIII IIIII IIIII IIIII 111111 IIIII IIIII IIII IIIII IIIII 111111 II 1111111 IIIII
111111 IN 111111 IN 1
ticketman
SCHWEERS
.11
Controt in the P•
of • Hand:
1 n-street computing
delivered •
You're never out of the office new dimensions to its users, as it will search,
The Schweers Ticketman X600 -11 combines the find retrieve and even print data such as
speed of handheld computers with the perfor- address files, city maps, timetables or restau-
mance and convenience of stationary terminals rant guides
The touchscreen allows you to write or draw Customer focus
The custom designed backlit keyboard makes Well aware that a perfect application consists of
typing with one hand easy - even wearing glo- exceptional hardware as well as brilliant soft -
ves Thanks to multiple interfaces, you may ware. Schweers works alongside customers to
access the internet or exchange data with other ensure that their needs are met in every respect
PCs, display machines or parking meters The The X600 -11 comes for instance with the
X600 -11 comes with a wide internal thermal powerful Politess 0 traffic enforcement soft -
printer supplying you with print -outs of texts ware and easily handles a variety of other inno-
graphics or even barcodes on the spot That is vative applications, such as statistics, market
why this handheld is called the "Office on the stall and harbour fees, maintenance of pay and
Streets' display equipment, police applications etc
Comfortable and ergonomic handling Main advantages at a glance
Unlike other handheld computers, the X600 -11 ✓ Robust & ergonomic design
is ergonomic - and it also makes use of Levera- ✓ State of art engineering
ges and torques to minimize the perceived ✓ Ease of use
weight while maximizing user - friendliness
Working with a mobile terminal has never been ✓ 400 MHz XScale processor
more comfortable ✓ High Capacity Li-Ion battery
A real service provider ✓ Microsoft Windows CE NET
The versatility and power of the X600 -11 opens ✓ Made in Germany
Applications
v Parking & Code Enforcement
r.. Traffic Enforcement
n Field Mobility
�- Market Stall and Harbour Fees
v Facility Management
v Security
v And many more
t It
.11
Performance Charactenstia Specialty suitable for right- and
left- handed persons
Device
Processor Marvell (Intel) XScale' PXA255 camera tired in
400 MHz viewing direction
Memory 128 MB RAM + 64 MB Flash -ROM Environment O
Optional up to 2GB ATA Flash Disk Operation -20 °C to +60 oC /
a Card temperature -4 F to +140 F
Storage Drop Specification 12 m /4 ft on concrete
Operating System Microsoft Windows CEnet 4 20 (drop & penduluml
Compact Framework 3 5 Environmental IP 64 water and dust
Power Supply Field Replaceable 2 2 Ah Li Ion Cell Protection resistant
optional 4Ah Regulatory
User Interfaces EN 55022 EN 55024 EN 6100 -3 -2 EN 61000 -3-3
Display 3 5" backlit (automatic daylight CE FCC & ROHS compliant
sensor) full graphic transflective
QVGA full color display Optional Features
Touchsreen High resolution analogue resistive Camera
Keyboard Full alphanumeric keyboard Resolution 31 Mpixel (2048x1536)
+ 2 lateral enter keys backlit Autofocus 10 cm -
silicon rubber Zoom up to 2x DRZ and 2x digital
(DRZ = Dynamic Resolution Zooml
Printer Integrated 3 "thermal printer Flash Light 2x LED flash light
papermark and paperend detection
Integrated Interface Infrared communication up to Bluetooth WLAN GPS GSM /GPRS /EDGE
115,200 Baud UMTS /G3 (HSPA) RFID I RFID II
IrDA and direct mode configurable Magnet Card Reader Smart Card Reader
Barcode Reader /Imager
Physical Characteristics Further options peripherals and accessories on demand.
Casing Schweers reserves the right to change this specification without prior
Material PC -ABS notice or notification
Dimensions 234 x 125 x 73 3 mm (LxWxH) Ticketman Politess and the Schweers Logo are registered trademarks
Weight 890g (incl printer, paper, battery) of Schweers Informationstechnologie GmbH
SCHWEERS
INFORMATIONSTECHNOLOGIE • • •
Schweers Informationstechnologie GmbH
Rudolf Diesel Str 18 4067 Meerbusch Germany
Tel +49 2159 5292-0 Fax +49 2159 5292
www schweers com
CiteZONE com
Attachment "B"
SAMPLE CITATIONS and PHOTOS
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Payment must be made within 21 days form the Citation
date or 14 days from the Notice of Parking Violation Please
include the Citation Number and the vehicle license plate on
your check or money order DO NOT MAIL CASH
M IL 1 ME
City of
clo Citation Services Center
P O Box 63246
Irvine CA 92602
PAY ONLINE OR BY PHONE
www PublicAccessZone com
(888) 755 -2011
PAY BY MOBILE PHONE,
0 p al
�s
in
TO CONTEST THIS CITATION You may contest this
citation within 21 calendar days of issuance or 14 days
from the Notice of Parking Violation Contest in writing
or online r@ www PublicAccessZone com Appeal forms
are available online Please call (888) 755 -2011 for
more information If you do not respond within the
timeframe above you will waive the right to contest this
citation per CVC 40215(x)
If you are cited for California Vehicle Code Section 5200 5202
or 5204 you must provide satisfactory proof of correction to
any police agency during regular business hours If the police
Agency determines the violation has been corrected the
agency will sign the certificate of correction The registered
oumer /operator is responsible for submitting the proof of
correction and pay a s15 00 processing fee
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
SECTWN SIG. OFFICER OAOGE ICY GATE
viaATEo
Samples following this pa_ae
Lafayette Citation and Photos
2.25" Parking Citation
3" Parking Citation
Traffic rcket
CITY OF LAFAYETTE
NOTICE OF PARKING VIOLATION
You are charged with a violation of the parking provisions of the Lafayette
Municipal Code (MC) or the California Vehicle Code (VC) The specific
violation(s) and amounts) due are indicated below
NOTE You must respond to this citation within 21 days of the issue by
(1) Paying the amount due or (2) Contesting the citation by filing an
Administrative Review form with the City
11111111MIN
40850249'
PARKING CITATION
Issue No. code
40850249
Date Thme
MON 11/05/2012 3:32 AM
Officer manse OQloerm
S. LLOYD LQ25
Agency Beat
City Of Lafayette BEAT 40
Photos MeterNa
YES
Location
12345 2ND STREET
Violation
Code: LMC"144C
DISABLED PARKING IN MUNICIPAL LOT
$280
Vehicle
License No State emp Type
4PPZ811 CA 0112013
Make ModeUBoftStyte
HONDA
VIN Color
1234 RED
Remarks
PHOTO TAKEN
YOU MAY PAY THE AMOUNT DUE BY MAIL
City of Lafayette Citation Seances Center
P 0 Box 63246 Irvine CA 92602 6108
Ph otos F or 4 08 502 49
It
l�Z=s:z:ii ar.r � � .,t 11�5�12 s:.,z:ll a�•I
"`�1Z345 ZIVD ST ; }�: 'i 1245 21VD STREET �'
``'► p p;hlNG
•:
12_ =� Zf�D STR.EETI�" .� •'� _ -r-
rw;
CITY OF COLUMBUS
NOTICE OF PARKING VIOLATION
You nave iocavao INS amtron for avlotaWn of ay par" IMPORTANT NOTICE
rogWaaom. The spcca "c valation b dewnbed be as READ CAREFULLY
Man PnnvmeM to.
4 8 5 2 Columbus Police Department a s
PARKING CITATION Parking Enforcement Division r
123 Washington street '❑
0850255 a Columbus. IN 47201 •
Dabe Time
TUE 11/06/2012 6 37 AM To Pay Onlinevwwcitepayzonecom
Officer Name Officer ID
G WARD 123 Fines for all overtime parking violations Got Including Three Hour Parking Zone and Short
C ity Of Lafayette BEAT 40 Tenn Parking Zone*
Phobos Meter No 1 ° violation in a calendar year so
NO 2 1 VIGabonIna calendar year $to
3'vlolabon In a Calendar year $15
Location 4- violation in a calendar year $20
465 ALMANOR LANE 5 in a calendar year $30
Violation If you fad to pay the fine within 72 hours of the
C e C 8120C violation an additional $10 late penalty Will be
PARKING IN LOADING ZONES added
$3000 Fine for Freight or Curb Loading Zone or City
Bus Loading Zone Violations $10 An
additional $10 late penalty win be added for
failure to pay the fine within 30 days of the
violation
Vehicle Fines for Leased Parking, Fire Lane Yellow
luense No State Exp Curb and No Parking Area violations $25 An
AAA111 CA 05/2012 additional $10 late penalty will be added for
Make ModeUBody style Type failure to pay the fine Within 30 days of the
violation Each day that a vehicle is parked
BUGA Illegally shall constitute a new violation
VIN Color
X123 (last 4 digg*MPAGNE BROWN Fine for Parking for Persons with Physical
Disabilities Spaces $50 An additional $50 late
Remarks penalty will be added for (allure to pay within 30
CITYPERMITOKILY days of the violation A $100 fine shall be
unposed for the second and subsequent
violations of this section
Cokmitra Police oeporinlenl For questions please call (812) 3764652
Cm OF COLUMSM CZ1012
173 WASHINGTON STREET
COLUMBUS, IN 47201
CITY OF LAFAYETTE
NOTICE OF PARKING VIOLATION IMPORTANT NOTICE
You my — ,grid wIh a . d aoon d aw Punk" Plo %!-- Of ub tahyeae
Mumdpat Cod. (NC) w the C&La Wade Code (VC) The saecdc
rdal—(a) arof amount(s) due m wmfta d raze Payment must be made within 21 days forth the Citation date or 14
NOTE You aa1R mspond to uia amaon .earn 21 days at Irs tame by
(1) Payne the .—I due a (2) CoM.eslft OW DWOM by WV days from the No tice of Parking Violation Please include the Citation m
A&m aaWa R.vI w rom--M ov C2y Number and the vehicle license plate on your check or money order
DO NOT MAIL CASH
IIII�����IUU I
M AI L PAYMEN O
e
ta
do Citatioon Services Center
a o e e n r o a P O Box 83248
PARKING CITATION Irvine CA 02802 - 8108
ssue o
90850204 PAY ONLINE OR BY PHONE
Dab Time www PublicAccessZone com
TUE 05/08/2012 135 PM (ee8)4434501
Officer Name Officer ID
G WARD 123 PAY BY MOBILE PHONE
Agency Beat
Public Works BEAT 40 Q
Photos Meter No
No 456 R
Location
SPRINGHILL SCHOOL 1234 TO CONTEST THIS CITATION. You may contest this
Violation citation within 21 calendar days of issuance or 14 days
Code LMC8 8164 from the Notice of Parking Violation Contest In writing or
METERED AND LOCKED BOX PARKING online @ www PublicAccessZone com Appeal fors are
$ 3000 available online Please call (888) 443.4501 for more
Information if you donot respond within the timeframe
above you will waive the right to contest this citation per
CVC 40215(a)
It you are cited for California Vehicle Code Section 5200 5202, or
Vehicle 5204 you must provide satisfactory proof of correction to any
License No State Exp Type poUce agency during regular business hours If the police Agency
QWERTY CA 02/2012 determines the violation has been corrected the agency will sign
Make ModeUBOdy Style the certificate of correction The registered ownedoperamr is
ACUR responsible for submitting the proof of correction and pay a $15.00
VIN Color processing fee
1234 (last 4 digits) BLACK
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
Rema SECTION SIG OFFICER BADGE
AGENCY GATE
t)IN 0 5 CKI 1) VIOLATED Caddying Cw 11
Q IJKLM
YOU MAY PAY THE AMOUNT DUE BY MALL
PO 5-6324 Gtalbn Savkca - e =
PO ROTH R aver CA OPTIONS
(�t'p�
FOR OTHER PAYMENT OPTIONS
MILL VALLEY
POLICE DEPARTMENT UHI A ll N M** IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY
NOTICE TO APPEAR 011(miR 11N(iN11"t C04429
H 0 Rx AINdt 11(11 t,AY(d FItK IAll K 19,111m) I oP l 111- r traa ra• I 1 i n n ,
9/6/2012 11 00 AM 1 hulsday it
(7 UtS114fIt.Al IA.)I� D(INrYI IC"Ri '+Ih A( IfsUIIY (Jr 11 ttMd�at rlMXll) _.— t{ _ I '_ ` _ _ _ a_
CAROL SMITH ,
) .-
mI& - ti _ - +t
i BLUE RIDGE COMMONS
nTy _ _ _ _ _ - - 51n71° /W A r FY 1 , r A t it
I t lit r Itr t t l
PALMOALE CA 79029 t — I r , rM1 a d , u i — 1.1 a i
W(IA( 10 00
I)Wwn►R wu - - - _ 11n11` Uxtt41xi1ni Jnld n11i1Rjinn a t I , 1 „ 1 a ,�
12800208 CA [@ Y, , [IN—)4 02/02/ 1971
iii - tTW4 rti t tl 1, a,l
11hat 1 YI % to P9'u QI Rau IFA(1 jTW I I Y i r a �: f ilia
F BLK BRN 500 125 H 1 _ - . k i i• t t, I t y l l
,: an , t 1> l i it F 1 r• r t
1 tiIAII
GYTR CA n r
f l tfiAxl i), tilYll (U (At ! a^ ,,. t t I ' i rdd 1 + I I i u
?II(Mt 1(x11) It NtMNYp I(At1A lilk �- 1111A
x d(A ix 1 IHANI 1nl 10 !F NEV6114-11
ALLSTATE
th ( , I au
1 tS11kibo (aitof Ir-,l I - - - �t.ua nlulwv ,,,,t- +-,F I ttr r , 1 S (
JOE SMITH t ad ,- I r I I A +r , • I
AlAxtl is - -- - - ,.nail ill ulna 1 , {, d 1 a 1 s 1 r 11 Ir + tY 1 I
I BLUE RIDGE COMMONS l i y1 1„
- -- - _ — ___ _—___— - a tau A I <a u 1
PALMDALE CA 74029
_ laa Ir 1 l 1 t t c t 1
(.(xtl" 1AWI YRAAI10H (W I I (rA )f Sl tt IUttltl �' IA>tikutV iCt.liwavl loiauux u 3 3 r t a t , 1 t i e P t f , , r i 1 r•
YNS IA%k rill .,Imi IkaatayAPua _ - -- to 11111 ((%Milt Iy t � , sn t 1 a, ,At i
❑� 1.111 ItvWAW PR(XA to UY,S' -tANil �'^ - 1 i Im Y a I i �rl'I i +l i la 1 It t Il't It
u s �N I I t)VI ft I Ot111{M 1 - -- _.�. Aau J , a 1 K 1 r a t a m a
rt a 1_ f+ ' 1 S t l A A 11 1
❑ ❑ _ ___..._._ —_ -.._ __ - - __ _ - -_ - — 1 A F r a , F , t { 1 7 � , , 11 r y I .f
_ t i { I t
'1q DA19+115k PI FLAX x9 �1 111) ^ I uIrr l L1 t(1N"i l nII11A41111MtI u1111 -
110 _ 35 �3J__ — nl 35
Th"fl - kill 111 1
MADISON ST
N of JEFFERSON 5I
((x4141 NIti(YA A IIA R IWA11Y IRAII it atNd ltlll I ACCIDENTO _ —.--
LIGHT, RAiN, DRY
J Westatl 001952
t 1314 I l i ft t l l B'1 R _-
09/06/2012 _ it
1Y1 11x11 N/tAl11IFM �11U1 111YiA IIZd IUN9R IIC AI Il- I1f 11 Af A+ilAl{ ItU +ka All Ulp liN!
t r dl , 4 A• 1 1 1 hwt It
1 1t Ar yt A, i �, t r a
baphthnt X 0„ ma t t u 7 i r t , ill I r I i 11 + r•,i
WH N'0170RfitFURF 1H1 T,Alt 10 /Z A :1uc11+Olan At, 1141 3 11 Ai , 1 11 ter U i s
WHAT TO 00 F616v a151t uchom attached e+ 1 t o
WHERE FIORENO YAIl FY TRAI FIC COURT +1, 1 + IY 1 II a 1 Y n
13800 t1CdLUCk 0201 .t A a I 11{ a
(9�n CA 91553
0 1611% au,tt -,l 22
rr, f A I A I I FA AN 1 t k*Y
caezom com
Attachment "C"
Management Information System Reports
CZ has an extensive set of standard management reports to support the
payment management analysis process We have included a list below
Standard Reports
Name Description
Issuance Reports
Violation Summary Provides a quantitative summary view of
citation activity by violation for a selectable
nod of time
Violation Summary by Area Provides a quantitative summary view of
citation activity by Area/Beat, by violation for
a selectable period of time
Violation Summary by Officer Provides a quantitative summary view of
citation activity by Officer, by violation for a
selectable period of time
Officer Log Detail list of citations issued by Officers or for
a selected Officer for a selected period of
time
Processing Reports
Citation Processing Activity Summary of citation processing activity for a
selected period of time Includes summary
counts and dollar value for entry,
maintenance and payments
Citation Aging Summary of financial data for current month,
current quarter, balance of year and past
years Includes summary values
withtwithout DMV Holds, with/without RIO
data for in -State and Out -of -State plates
Current Open Citations Provides ability to list a detail view of
citations which are currently in open status
Entered Citations Provides a detailed list of citations which
entered the system over a selected period of
time
Citation Aging by Year Summary of financial data for current year to
date, past five years and aggregate beyond
Includes summary values wdh/without DMV
Holds, with/Hnthout R/O data for in -State and
Out -of -State plates
Cleared Citations Provides ability to list a detail view of
citations which have been cleared by
payment, dismissal or voidin
Credit Balance Provides ability to list a detail view of
Name Description `
citations with a credit value in balance due
Summary of Daily Payments Received Provides a detail list and summary of
pay ments received
Citation Payment After Activity Summary view of citation payment activity
including those which occurred after
issuance of notices or DMV Holds
Citation at Collections Provide a detailed list of citations sent to bad
debt collection
Processing Specialty Reports
Payment Batch Summary Provides a summary of batch payments by
method of payment for a specified period
Outstanding NSF Check Service Fees Provides a report of NSF fees assessed to
on Open citation
Out of State Plates Payment Detailed report of payment made ontfor Out
of State plates
Late Payments Detail report of payments made where Late
Fees were applied
Payments Received Report Provides a detailed list of payments received
for citations along with an end of report
p ayment summa
Citation Payments After Collection Provides a summary & detail view of
citations where payments were made after a
citation went to the Collections stem
Processing Exception Reports
Skeletal Citations Report Provides a list of payments made on
citations where the detailed citation data has
not been entered into the system
Open Citations Without R/O Information Provides a list of citations without Registered
Owner information
Citation with R/0 but 1 st Notice Not Sent Provides a detailed list of unpaid citations
with Registered Owner data where a first
notice has not been sent
Citation with R/O but 2 nd Notice Not Sent Provides a detailed list of unpaid citations
with Registered Owner data where a second
notice has not been sent
Suspended Citations Provides a list of suspended citations by
date suspended
Selected Samples follow this page
Issued Citations Report
Vio/abon Summary by Officer Report
Officer Lo_a Report
Hot Sheet Report
Issued Citations Report Run 05/151201313 4420 Page 14 of 14
ti
SANTACLARA Includes dates from 4/1/2013 thru 4/30/2013
CITATION ISSUED LICENSE STATE NUMBER STREET NAME REMARKS BALANCE
40001920 04129/2013 3WBJ745 CA 2236 SCHOTT CT 13600
40001921 04/29/2013 2RF736 OK 4034 LICK MILL BLVD 000
40001922 04/29/2013 6JZN465 CA 1400 BOWE AVE 4800
40001923 040013 5ZHH654 CA 873 FRANKLIN ST 4800
40001924 04/29/2013 6ZMU458 CA 873 FRANKLIN ST 000
40001925 04/2912013 6XEN634 CA 800 FRANKLIN ST 000
40001926 04!2912013 7K36452 CA 461 LAFAYETTE WAY 5300
40001927 04/30/2013 6TUF635 CA 5201 GREAT AMERICA PKWY 000
40001928 04/3d/2013 8W04318 CA 5201 GREAT AMERICA PKWY 5300
40001929 04/3=013 6PFV220 CA 5201 GREAT AMERICA PKWY 6300
40001930 04/30/2013 5SLP840 CA 5201 GREAT AMERICA PKWY 5300
40001931 04/30/2013 5RDS166 CA 850 POPLAR ST 000
40001932 04/30/2013 A169430 WA 410 LAFAYETTE WAY 6300
40001933 04130/2013 6YYH844 CA 461 LAFAYETTE WAY 5300
40001934 04!3012013 8M38533 CA 461 LAFAYETTE WAY 5300
40001935 04/30/2013 6DTH967 CA 745 LOCUST ST 000
40001936 04130/2013 6RRT821 CA 791 FREMONT ST 000
40001937 04130/2013 6VIG291 CA 595 FRANKLIN ST 5300
40001936 04130/2013 6PGF588 CA 2600 THE ALAMEDA 000
40001939 04/30/2013 5LZT623 CA 2600 THE ALAMEDA 000
40001940 04 1424HG FL 740 BELLOMY ST 5300
40001941 04/3012013 193WGO WA 655 WASHINGTON ST 6300
40001942 04/30/2013 8KO5334 CA 950 SANTA CLARA ST 5300
40001943 0413012013 4YWK498 CA 950 SANTA CLARA ST 5300
P063704 04/07/2013 4VNE087 CA 2173 AZA DRIVE 4800
P064277 04106/2013 6KZW968 CA 590 HILMAR ST 5300
P064278 04/06/2013 6MSZ512 CA 590 HILMAR ST 5300
P064279 04/06/2013 6EPT564 CA 520 HILMAR ST 5300
P064280 04/1712013 4YXL525 CA 2080 SCOTT BLVD NO PARKING 4300
P064281 04/07/2013 3VCF366 CA 2080 SCOTT BLVD NO PARKING 4300
P064282 04/0712013 6VIK297 CA 2080 SCOTT BLVD NO PARKING 4300
P084283 04/1312013 4PIR447 CA LICKMILIIPARK WEST 9300
P084284 04/13/2013 6XIK453 CA 4032 LICK MILL BLVD NO PARKING 4300
P064285 04/13/2013 4UYH218 CA 4032 LICK MILL BLVD NO PARKING 4300
P064288 04H312013 5RNR063 CA 4032 LICK MILL BLVD NO PARKING 000
P064356 04/17/2013 - CA 3295 SAINT IGNATIUS PL 4300
P084592 0410412013 8MB5739 CA 161 ROXBBURY 4300
P06576i 04/25/2013 Y97984 CA 2943 BENTON ST 4300
P068202 04/16/2013 B01361W WA 430 LAFAYETTE WAY 4300
P070117 04/25/2013 6AAN569 CA 2520 WARBURTON AVE 9300
P070118 04/25/2013 4NKN481 CA RAGGIO AVE @ LAINE 9300
AVE
P070119 04/2512013 5X42477 CA 2474 WARBURTON AVE 9300
P070157 04/02/2013 SG98895 CA 1246 LEXINGTON MARKED TIRES 3128/13 6300
P070169 04/02/2013 4FIK082 CA WATSON CIRBURDICK 000
Total Citations 788 Total Balace Amount $30,402.94
Violation Summary by Run 05/151201313 54 39 Page 1 of 1
r Officer Report
LAFAY LIM,
LAFAYETTE Includes dates from 4/1/2013 thru 4/30/2013
Officer AHS AMAC
Violation Description Amount Late Fee Total Percent Total Percent
CVC21113A PKGIPUBLIC GROUNDS (CITY HOSP) $4600 $3000 12 10000 $54000 10000
Totals 12 10000 $54000 10000
Officer LQ26 LLOYD, SHARON
Violation Description Amount late Fee Total Percent Total Percent
CVC225008 BLOCKING CROSSWALK $45.00 $3000 1 049 $4600 0.45
CVC22500E BLOCKING DRIVEWAY $4500 $3000 1 049 S4600 046
CVC22500F BLOCKING SIDEWALK $4500 $3000 4 194 $18000 179
CVC22602A CURB PARKING $4500 $30 00 3 146 $13600 135
CVC22507 SA PARKING IN HANDICAPPED STALL $28500 $3000 3 I A6 $85500 853
CMC5200 NO LICENSE PLATES $4500 $3000 5 243 $22500 2.24
CVC6204 TABS NOT DISPLAYED $45 W $30 OD 1 049 S4600 045
LMC8 -8101 TIME LIMIT $45 00 $3000 19 922 $85600 863
LMCS -8104 PARKING SPACE MARKINGS $4500 $3000 5 243 $22500 224
LMCB -81200 PARKING IN LOADING ZONES $4500 $3000 2 097 $9000 0 90
L MCB -8141 B PARKINGISTANDING IN MUNICIPAL LOT $4500 $3000 1 049 $4600 045
LMCS -8153 OVERNIGHT PARKING PROHIBITED $5800 $3000 3 146 $17400 173
LMC"163 PARKING WITHIN SPACES $45.00 $3000 1 049 $4500 046
LMCB -8164 METERED AND LOCKED BOX PARKING $4500 $3000 151 7330 $6.79500 6775
LMC8 -890C NO STOPPINGIPARKING $4500 $3000 6 2.91 $27000 269
Totals 206 10000 $10,02900 10000
Officer L034 KOTSCHWAR, NICCOLE
Violation Description Amount Late Fee Total Percent Total Percent
CVC212118 PARKED IN BIKE LANE $4500 $30 .00 1 019 $4500 019
CVC21468A PARKED IN RED ZONE $4500 $3000 4 078 $18000 076
CVC22600B BLOCKING CROSSWALK $4500 $3000 1 019 $4500 019
CVC22600E BLOCKING DRIVEWAY $4600 $3000 3 0.58 $13600 056
CVC22502A CURB PARKING $45.00 $3000 1 019 $4500 019
CVC22507 8A PARKING IN HANDICAPPED STALL $28600 $3000 3 058 $85600 355
CVC22507 8C PARKING ON L1NESIHANDICAPPED STALL $28500 $3000 1 019 $28500 118
CVC6200 NO LICENSE PLATES $4500 $3000 18 360 $810 00 336
CVC5204 TABS NOT DISPLAYED $4500 $3000 1 019 $4500 019
LMC"101 TIME LIMIT $4500 $3000 80 1566 $3,60000 1494
LMCB -8104 PARKING SPACE MARKINGS $4500 $3000 5 097 $22500 093
LMCB -8122A STANDING IN LOADING ZONES $45.00 $3000 2 039 $9000 037
LMCB -8164 METERED AND LOCKED BOX PARKING $45.00 $30.00 384 7471 $17,28000 7173
LMCB -890C NO STOPPINGIPARKiNG $4500 $3000 10 196 $46000 187
Totals 514 10000 $24,09000 10000
Officer LQ36 WHITE, KEVIN — -
Violation Description Amount Late Fee Total Percent Total Percent
CVC2250CE BLOCKING DRIVEWAY $4600 $30 00 1 100 $4500 095
CVC22505B PARKING IN POSTED NO PARKING AREA $4500 $3000 2 2.00 $9000 190
CVC22507 8A PARKING IN HANDICAPPED STALL $285.00 $3000 1 100 $28500 601
CVC6200 NO LICENSE PLATES $4500 $3000 22 2200 $990 00 2089
CVC6204 TABS NOT DISPLAYED $4600 $3000 11 1100 $49500 1044
LMC8 -8122A STANDING IN LOADING ZONES $4500 $3000 1 100 $4500 083
L -8 METERED AND LOCKED BOX PARKING $4500 $3000 62 6200 $2,79000 5886
Totals 100 10000 $4,74000 10000
Offi Log Report Run 05/141201316 Page 10416
r� �p r
LAWALT
LAFAYETTE Includes dates gran 41112013 thiu 4/3012013
Officer Id AHS
CITATION TIME DATE LOCATION VIOLATION AMOUNT STATE LICENSE
1901719 10.35 04/1112013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 4500 CA 6RFN207
1901727 1040 0411112013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 45.00 CA 5BXE134
1901735 10:40 04/1112013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 4600 CA 4WFV932
Citations 3 Violation Amount $13600
CITATION TIME DATE LOCATION VIOLATION AMOUNT STATE LICENSE
1901750 0830 04/1212013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 4500 CA 61 ZES12
Citations 1 Violation Amount 545.00
CITATION TIME DATE LOCATION VIOLATION AMOUNT STATE LICENSE
1901271 08.30 04123!2013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 4500 CA DMNODRM
1901313 0660 04123/2013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 4500 CA 6RGO029
1901321 0900 04123/2013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 45.00 CA 5VXC376
1901339 0900 0412312013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 45.00 CA 3XXBL563
Citations 4 Violation Amount $180.00
CITATION TIME DATE LOCATION VIOLATION AMOUNT STATE LICENSE
ISM354 08:20 04/2412013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 4500 CA SXFK137
1901370 08.20 04/2412013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 4600 CA DIUNODRM
1901388 08.25 04/24/2013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL CVC21113A 4500 CA
CVC21113A 45.00 CA 5HJM416
1901396 1026 04/2412013 ACALANES HIGH SCHOOL
Citations 4 Violation Amount $18000
Officer Id L025
CITATION TIME DATE LOCATION VIOLATION AMOUNT STATE LICENSE
40858404 0117 04/01/2013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMCB -8164 45 00 CA 6MQJ952
40858405 0122 04/01/2013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMCB -8164 45.00 CA 6TLK749
40858406 02.35 04/01/2013 OAKHILL ROAD LMCB -8164 45.00 CA 7X53318
40858407 0249 04/0112013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMC"164 45.00 CA 37199H1
40858408 0312 0410112013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMCB -6164 45.00 CA 6.112903
40858409 0328 0410112013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMCB -8164 45M CA 6BTH583
1894740 0833 04/01/2013 3316 S,LUCILLE LMC"i63 5800 CA 8853475
40868401 1131 040112013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMC"164 4600 CA 6VVVBST1
40858402 12.41 04/01/2013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMCB 8104 4500 CA 6NNU853
40858403 1258 04/0112013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMCB -8164 4500 CA GMNZ654
Citations 10 Violation Amount 546300
CITATION TIME DATE LOCATION VIOLATION AMOUNT STATE LICENSE
40858410 09:30 04/03/2013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMC"164 4500 CA 6THG835
4085411 10 9 0410312013 MORAGA ROAD LMC"164 45 00 CA 6XJD156
40858412 10 04/0312013 MORAGA ROAD LMCM164 4500 CA KNTNONI
40858413 1125 0410312013 GOLDEN GATE WAY LMC"i64 4500 CA PUP804
Cifadons 4 Vtoldon Amount b780.00
CITATION 11ME DATE LOCATION VIOLATION AMOUNT STATE LICENSE
4WS8421 0110 04/04/2013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMC8.8164 4500 CA 4KRJ765
40868422 0117 0410412013 MT DIABLO BLUR LMCM164 4500 CA 6XGGS20
40858423 02 04/0412013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMC"164 4600
40858424 02.11 0410412013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMCB -8164 4500 CA 5NRB853
40858425 0307 04/04/2013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMCS4164 4500 CA eFyxI63
40858426 03.18 0410412013 GOLDEN GATE WAY L.MCB -8164 45.00 ME JKH7204
40858427 0336 0410412M 3 MORAGA ROAD LMCIC8$"164 45 00 CA PO 164 45 00 CA LOVEBRL BRI.
40858428 0337 0410413 MORAGA ROAD LN
40858414 0904 04/0412013 PLAZA WAY LMC"164 45.00 CA 6TT14442
40856415 0930 04/04/1013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMC"164 4500 CA 61MYN972
408511416 0933 04!0412013 MT DIABLO BLVD LMGB -0164 4500 CA 6VYE711
40$58417 1040 041=13 MT DIABLO BLVD LMCB- 8164 4500 CA 6VNVWM
Hot Sheet Report Run 051151201313 52 Page2 of 4
LAWAYETIrE
4
LAFAYETTB
License State Citation Issue Date RO Name Amount Due
4RZ N715 CA 40855164 11/1412012 RAINBIRD KELLY LEE $6000
4RZW715 CA 40855939 12/0712012 RAINBIRD KELLY LEE $8000
4RZW115 CA 40858631 04/1112013 RAINBIRD KELLY LEE $7600
Count 11 Amount pw
License State Citation Issue Date RO Name
4TW442 CA 40400813011 0310712012 SHERBORNE JENNIFER RENEE $6000
4TKV442 CA 40852973 0810212012 SHERBORNE JENNIFER RENEE $6000
4TKV442 CA 40853314 0811412012 SHERBORNE JENNIFER RENEE $8000
4TKV442 CA 40853380 0813012012 SHERBORNE JENNIFER RENEE $60 00
4TKV442 CA 40855350 1112912012 $60.00
4TKV442 CA 40855985 1211912012 SHERBORNE JENNIFER RENEE $
4TKV442 CA 40856388 01/1012013 SHERBORNE JENNIFER RENEE $7500
4TKV442 CA 40858218 0312112013 SHERBORNE JENNIFER RENEE $7600
Count 8
License State Citation Issue Date RO Name Amount Due
4UDS992 CA 40400469661 10127/2008 LECLEAR TRINITY LEIGHANN $5500
4UDS992 CA 40400482948 1212212008 LECLEAR TRINITY LEIGHANN $6500
4UDS992 CA 40400510681 022612009 LECLEAR TRINITY LEIGHANN $5500
4UDS992 CA 40400520061 0410712009 LECLEAR TRINITY LEIGHANN $5500
41�S992 CA 40400549903 0610912009 LECLEAR TRINITY LEIGHANN
Count 5
License State Citation Issue Date RO Name Amount Due
4YNP328 CA 40400523524 03/302009 WHITEHOUSE TIMOTHY J $30 00
4YNP328 CA 40400528015 05/112009 WHITEHOUSE TIMOTHY J $ 5500
4YNP328 CA 40400529253 06/0512009 WHITEHOUSE TIMOTHY J $55.00
4YNP328 CA 40400530454 04/292009 WHITEHOUSE TIMOTHY J $ 5500
4YNP328 CA 40400549763 061082009 WHITEHOUSE TIMOTHY J $55 00
4YNP328 CA 40400555352 07/1312009 WHITEHOUSE TIMOTHY J $55 00
4YNP328 CA 40400556671 07/102009 WHITEHOUSE TIMOTHY J $55 00
4YNP328 CA 40400558690 07202009 WHITEHOUSE TIMOTHY J $55 00
Count 8
License State Citation issue pate RO Name Amount Due
5ABU163 CA 40400557566 07/162009 MARSON CHARLES C $25 00
6ASU 282
153 CA 40400619656 02010 MARSON CHARLES C $25 00
5ABU153 CA 40400753334 07/052011 MARSON CHARLES C $30 00
5ABU153 CA 40400780741 0823/2011 MARSON CHARLES C $300
5ABU153 CA 404OD792070 10/132011 MARSON CHARLES C $30 0
00
5ABU153 CA 40400825633 02/292012 MARSON CHARLES C ti30 00
Count 6
Ucense State Citation Issue Date RO Name Amount Duo
5AWC140 CA 40400468832 10/20/2008 MARIN ROBIN T $65
5AWC140 CA 40400472236 101292008 MARIN ROBIN T $5500
5AWC140 CA 40400491733 12/102008 MARIN ROBIN T $6500
5AWC140 CA 40400819532 01/302012 MARIN ROBIN T $5000
5AWC140 C A 40853534 081312012 MARIN ROBIN T $6000
Count 6
License State Citation Issue Date RO Name Amount Due
5KPF241 CA 40400769493 081162011 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $30 00
5KPF241 CA 40400789686 10/262011 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $6400
5KPF241 CA 40400808634 01/0912012 13ROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $3000
5KPF241 CA 40400824701 0221/2012 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $60 00
5KPF241 CA 40400826572 02106/2012 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $30.00
5KPF241 CA 40400830076 030512012 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $3000
5KPF241 CA 40851323 06=012 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $ 6000
5KPF241 CA 40852333 07!062012 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $6000
5KPF241 CA 4085253E 0723/2012 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $8000
6KPF241 CA 40852919 07/302012 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $0000
SKPF241 CA 40855177 11/192012 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN s w 00
5KPF241 CA 40855823 120012012 BROCKMAN CHRISTIAN $6000
Count 12
CiteZone Aparc Duncan Cardinal
4 handheld citation devices with field printer & Motorola MC75A Motorola MC65 AutoCITE X3 Casio IT9000
camera w /Zebra RW420 Printer w /Zebra RW420
Printer
Equipment Cost $8,252 $10,704 $14,094 $11,192
Accessories Cost $633 $756 incl $488
SOFTWARE IssueZone TicketManager AutolSSUE TickeTrak
Required
a Handheld software must provide a user- x x x x
friendly interface for ease of use and durability
b Handheld software must be completely x x x x
configurable so that the department may select
data entry fields and make them a required
entry, an optional entry, or an unused field
c The software must require a x x x x
password /security sign on
d The system must support entry of x x x Exception -- can
information such as vehicle make, model, color, only do voids on
style, plate type, violation, void and standard PC
codes The citation entry screen must be a
selectable format such as drop down menus
e The system must easily allow the user to x x x x
display all citation data entered to that point
and to edit or modify any field without
disruption of the citation entry process
f The system must allow the user to view and x x x Exception -- can
void any citation written by the user since the only do voids on
last upload of data to the host A valid void code PC
must be entered for the voiding of any
completed citation The system must support
the reprinting of an issued citation, this
reprinted citation must contain the same time as
the original citation not simply the time it was re
printed The system must be able to produce a
voided ticket audit trail
g When the license plate is entered during a x x x x
citation entry, the system must automatically
search the customer, vehicle, and scofflaw
request file for a match If a match is found, the
customer and vehicle information should be
automatically entered into the proper data fields
without additional keying by the officer If a
match is found in the scofflaw request file, the
system must display the number of citations in
the last 90 days
CiteZone Aparc Duncan Cardinal
4 handheld citation devices with field printer & Motorola MC75A Motorola MC65 AutoCITE X3 Casio IT9000
camera w /Zebra RW420 Printer w /Zebra RW420
Printer
h The system must support monitoring of x x x x
vehicles in a fixed time zone The system must
maintain a file of license plate numbers in a
fixed time zone and display the elapsed time and
previous location of the vehicle The software
should allow the user to enter the citation entry
module directly from the chalking module with
one keystroke
i All transactions must be time stamped by x x x x
the systems internal clock
l The system must support the issuance and x x x x
tracking of warnings as well as actual citations
k The system must support standard location x x x x
codes and descriptions, location comments,
block numbers, and meter numbers Location
descriptions should be used in a drop down
menu format Locations shall also be manually
generated when necessary
m The handheld must have a level of security x x x x
which provides the officer a sign on to prevent
unauthorized use
o The software shall allow the user to select x x x x
whether they wish to check for multiple
citations to the same vehicle in the same day
and notify the officer of the previous citation
Optional
I The system should be configurable by PC only x x PC only
authorized personnel to allow field personnel to
modify the standard violation fine The system
shall only allow one fine per citation
n The system should have a field for officer x x x Exception -
comments which can be preprogrammed into comments do not
the system "canned" or free form comments repeat from
The Officer shall have a choice for these to print citation to citation
on the citation or simply show in the system
Option for same comment to repeat from
citation to citation if selected
p The handheld should support presentation x x x x
of citation data entry screens according to a user
specified order
q The handheld should have drop down menu x x x x
choices for all US States and Canadian Provinces
This list should be able to allow for those most
utilized to be placed in order of use
CiteZone Aparc Duncan Cardinal
4 handheld citation devices with field printer & Motorola MC75A Motorola MC65 AutoCITE X3 Casio IT9000
camera w /Zebra RW420 Printer w /Zebra RW420
Printer
r The software should provide the ability to x x x x
take an unlimited number of color or non -color incl FTP photo
snapshots The software must automatically transfer with ticket
download the snapshots and associate to the ($18,000 mcl in
appropriate citation record Software Costs)
Software Cost $8,000 $37,160 $3,000 $16,721
Data Import/Export Yes Yes Yes Yes
Work with CodeSmart Yes Yes Yes Provide a XML file
or fixed length
export file
Hardware & Software Maintenance Support
Years 3 5 5 5
After hours support Hardware Yes, Software Yes No
No
Maintenance Cost $3,307 $764/mo $8,480 $5,396
Total Purchase Price $19 $66,620 $31,574 $37,854
OPTIONAL COSTS
Monthly Lease Option $600 $1,383 $828 Lease Option is for
two installments
with 50% Down
payment
Installation $500/day + travel $12,000 $3,000 $3,500
expenses
Paper Products $1,640 $224 $2,253 $1,045
Trade -In $1,000 n/a $425 n/a
Chapter 20 46 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Page 1 of 1
20 46 040 MANUFACTURED HOMES
(a) Manufactured homes are permitted on one (1) individual parcel, lot, or tract in
residential zones, provided, that the home is
(1) Approved by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries or
the U S Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the appropriate
certification insignia is affixed to the unit, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter
43 22 RCW,
(2) Comprised of at least two (2) fully enclosed parallel sections each of not
less than twelve (12) feet wide by thirty -six (36) feet long,
(3) Set upon a permanent foundation, as specified by the manufacturer, and
that the space from the bottom of the home to the ground be enclosed by concrete or
an approved concrete product which can be either load- bearing or decorative,
(4) Compliant with all local design standards applicable to all other homes
within the neighborhood in which the manufactured home is to be located,
(5) Thermally equivalent to the State Energy Code,
(6) Originally constructed with and now has a composition or wood shake or
shingle, coated metal, or similar roof of nominal three to twelve (3 12) pitch or greater,
(7) Sided with exterior siding similar in appearance to materials commonly
used on conventional site -built International Building Code single -family residences,
and
(8) A new manufactured home as defined in RCW 35 63 160 (2)
(b) A manufactured home which was legally placed and maintained prior to the
date of adoption of this chapter, and does not meet the requirements of this chapter,
shall be deemed to be a nonconforming structure If a legal nonconforming
manufactured home is partially or wholly destroyed, replaced, or altered, it shall be
required to meet the relevant requirements set forth in the nonconforming provisions of
this title
(c) The Building Official or designee shall inspect the installation of manufactured
homes prior to occupancy and issue certificates of occupancy for manufactured
homes If all requirements are met, a certificate of occupancy shall be issued No
manufactured home shall be occupied until after the City issues a valid certificate of
occupancy
(d) If a manufactured home is replaced by another manufactured home, a new
certificate of occupancy shall be required for the installation of a manufactured home
after the date of adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter (Ord 4950 §8 (Exh
A) (part), 2005)
http / /www codepublishmg com/ wa/ Bremerton /html /Bremerton20 /Bremerton2046 html 8/28/2013
Chapter 20 46 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Page 1 of 1
r
20 46 010 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) may be installed where a new or existing single -
family dwelling unit (hereafter, "principal unit ") is allowed Accessory dwelling units are
exempt from density requirements and shall be subject to the following specific
development, design and owner occupancy standards
(a) An ADU shall comply with the development standards of the underlying zone
for the principal unit including setbacks, height, and lot coverage
(b) An ADU may be attached or detached from the principal unit
(c) Only one (1) ADU may be created per lot
(d) The property owner, which shall include titleholders and contract purchasers,
must occupy either the principal unit or the ADU as their permanent residence for at
least six (6) months out of the year
(e) An ADU shall be limited to not more than
(1) Sixty (60) percent of the principal unit's total floor area (not including
basement), and
(2) One thousand (1,000) square feet maximum, nor less than three hundred
(300) square feet
(f) Any ADU shall be designed so that the appearance of the building remains that
of a single - family residence including the following
(1) Constructed of similar materials and siding as the principal unit,
(2) A roof of equal or greater pitch as the principal unit,
(3) A height no more than twenty -five (25) percent greater than the principal
unit not to exceed the height limit of the zone
(g) The entrance to an attached ADU shall not be on the same facade of the
structure as an entrance to the principal unit
(h) Accessory dwelling units shall provide one (1) off - street parking space in
addition to that which is required for the principal unit
(i) When development of an ADU is for people with disabilities, the Director may
allow reasonable deviation from the stated requirements to install features that
facilitate accessibility such as those required by the International Building Code
0) An ADU shall have a deed restriction recorded with the Kitsap County Auditor to
indicate the presence of the ADU, the requirement of owner occupancy, and other
standards for maintaining the unit as described above (Ord 5008 §4, 2007 Ord 4950
§8 (Exh A) (part), 2005)
http //www codepublishmg com/ wa/ Bremerton /html/Bremerton20 /Bremerton2046 html 8/28/2013
Chapter 20 46 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Page 1 of 1
20 46 010 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) may be installed where a new or existing single-
family dwelling unit (hereafter, "principal unit ") is allowed Accessory dwelling units are
exempt from density requirements and shall be subject to the following specific
development, design and owner occupancy standards
(a) An ADU shall comply with the development standards of the underlying zone
for the principal unit including setbacks, height, and lot coverage
(b) An ADU may be attached or detached from the principal unit
(c) Only one (1) ADU may be created per lot
(d) The property owner, which shall include titleholders and contract purchasers,
must occupy either the principal unit or the ADU as their permanent residence for at
least six (6) months out of the year
(e) An ADU shall be limited to not more than
(1) Sixty (60) percent of the principal unit's total floor area (not including
basement), and
(2) One thousand (1,000) square feet maximum, nor less than three hundred
(300) square feet
(f) Any ADU shall be designed so that the appearance of the budding remains that
of a single -family residence including the following
(1) Constructed of similar materials and siding as the principal unit,
(2) A roof of equal or greater pitch as the principal unit,
(3) A height no more than twenty -five (25) percent greater than the principal
unit not to exceed the height limit of the zone
(g) The entrance to an attached ADU shall not be on the same facade of the
structure as an entrance to the principal unit
(h) Accessory dwelling units shall provide one (1) off - street parking space in
addition to that which is required for the principal unit
(i) When development of an ADU is for people with disabilities, the Director may
allow reasonable deviation from the stated requirements to install features that
facilitate accessibility such as those required by the International Building Code
0) An ADU shall have a deed restriction recorded with the Kitsap County Auditor to
indicate the presence of the ADU, the requirement of owner occupancy, and other
standards for maintaining the unit as described above (Ord 5008 §4, 2007 Ord 4950
§8 (Exh A) (part), 2005)
http //www codepublishmg com/ wa/ Bremerton /htmUBremerton20/Bremerton2046 html 8/28/2013
Money into new Road Construction /Maintenance Fund (non - arterial)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
from water 116,653 264,351 374,940 494,302 620,002 680,630
from sewer 78,714 168,394 273,703 382,989 496,402 611,831
from stormwater 370 11,897 20,630 29,873 36,288 42,949
total 195,737 444,642 669,272 907,164 1,152,691 1,335,410
total for six years 4,70
8/26/2013 4 05 PM aggregates
subtotal Beginning projected REET 15% money to money to REST
Year Fund 203 Fund 204 Fund 205 REET needs FB REET REET Rev available reserve sidewalks streets remaining
2014 62,844 99 91,405 88 208,607 76 362,858 63 330,894 00 420,000 00 388,035 37 54,428 79 20,000 00 25,000 00 288,606 58
2015 79,320 63 84,829 56 206,568 76 370,718 95 343,035 37 420,000 00 392,316 42 55,607 84 20,000 00 25,000 00 291,708 58
2016 89,690 01 87,195 59 207,768 76 384,654 37 347,316 42 420,000 00 382,662 05 57,698 16 20,000 00 25,000 00 279,963 90
2017 109,216 23 84,429 94 208,868 76 402,514 94 337,662 05 420,000 00 355,147 12 60,377 24 20,000 00 25,000 00 249,769 88
2018 108,162 17 86,664 27 209,868 76 404,695 21 310,147 12 420,000 00 325,45191 60,704 28 20,000 00 25,000 00 219,747 63
2019 106,103 69 83,766 91 210,768 76 400,639 37 280,45191 420,000 00 299,812 54 60,095 91 20,000 00 25,000 00 194,716 64
2020 108,891 77 85,869 56 205,518 76 400,280 09 254,812 54 420,000 00 274,532 46 60,042 01 20,000 00 25,000 00 169,490 44
2021 106,372 95 82,840 51 204,743 76 393,957 22 229,S3246 420,000 00 255,575 23 59,093 58 20,000 00 25,000 00 151,48165
2022 103,700 69 83,748 15 203,293 76 390,742 61 210,575 23 420,000 00 239,832 63 58,611 39 20,000 00 25,000 00 136,22124
2023 105,874 99 84,477 89 206,693 76 397,046 64 194,832 63 420,000 00 217,785 99 59,557 00 20,000 00 25,000 00 113,228 99
2024 106,389 36 85,029 72 209,793 76 401,212 84 172,785 99 420,000 00 191,573 14 60,181 93 20,000 00 25,000 00 86,391 22
2025 106,545 76 85,403 59 207,593 76 399,543 11 146,573 14 420,000 00 167,030 03 59,93147 20,000 00 25,000 00 62,098 57
2026 96,344 23 85,599 56 205,243 76 387,187 54 122,030 03 420,000 00 154,842 49 58,078 13 20,000 00 25,000 00 51,764 36
2027 99,739 52 84,887 63 202,743 76 387,370 91 109,842 49 420,000 00 142,47158 58,105 64 20,000 00 25,000 00 39,365 94
2028 97,524 00 83,971 72 205,093 76 386,589 48 97,471 58 420,000 00 130,882 10 57,988 42 20,000 00 25,000 00 27,893 68
2029 99,901 30 82,851 82 206,48126 389,234 39 85,882 10 420,000 00 116,647 71 58,385 16 20,000 00 25,000 00 13,262 55
2030 96,667 84 76,527 90 207,543 76 380,739 50 71,647 71 420,000 00 110,908 21 57,110 93 20,000 00 25,000 00 8,79728
2031 98,027 18 000 203,28126 301,308 44 6S,90821 420,000 00 184,599 77 45,196 27 20,000 00 25,000 00 94,403 51
2032 93,539 38 000 209,218 76 302,758 14 139,599 77 420,000 00 256,84163 45,413 72 20,000 00 25,000 00 166,427 91
2033 93,637 64 000 204,687 50 298,325 14 211,84163 420,000 00 333,516 49 44,748 77 20,000 00 25,000 00 243,767 72
2034 98,114 97 000 200,000 00 298,114 97 288,516 49 420,000 00 410,401 52 44,717 25 20,000 00 25,000 00 320,684 27
2035 81,764 47 000 000 81,764 47 365,40152 420,000 00 703,637 05 12,264 67 20,000 00 25,000 00 646,372 38
t w�` Q f ♦7
f
S
7/25/2013 2 05 PM
1
REET requirements
August 28, 2013 Study Session
General Council Business C -2
Proposed 2014 Council Goals
Goals involving Public Works Department
1) Street Department Projects (Capital & Maintenance)
a) Budget more money for projects around schools (sidewalks)
b) Increase money for paving overlays (road maintenance)
c) Set aside money for grant matches
d) Set aside money for small street projects (speed bumps, street lights)
e) Design & estimate street projects in the city and look for grant opportunities
f) Continue to fund painting (striping, crosswalks, curbs)
2) Street Department Proiects (Funding Sources for above protect considerations)
a) Extend TBD
b) Continue PILOT at current percentage(s) but establish 2013 collections as a baseline and
divert extra to street fund as utility rates increase over the next 5 years
c) REET appropriations could be done in a way similar to item "b"
d) Look for grant opportunities "Safe Routes to School'
e) If Grant, PILOT or TBD options are off the table Determine which project to divert money
away from to support above capital requests
3) Utility Department
a) Freeze PILOT at current dollar amount (as rates increase percentages will drop)
Goals involving Finance Department
a) Build contingency reserve fund
Goals involving Community Development
1) Annexation
a) Develop a Marketing/Outreach strategy
b) Set goals and time lines
c) Develop a cost benefit analysis
d) Develop a strategy for which areas (north of Riddell, Gorst, Navy Yard City, Rocky Point)
2) Annexation (Funding)
a) Staff and material resources require funding
Marketing
1) Develop a Marketing and Branding plan for Bremerton
a) Hire a consultant
b) Hire part time city employee
c) Fund way - finding signs
d) Decide what to market (Tourism, Image, Livability, Efficiency)
2) Fund Consultant and Capital /Maintenance costs
a) Where will the money come from
August 28, 2013 Study Session
General Council Business C -2
Proposed Council Goals from Council Study Sessions & Comments
County wide animal control ordinance (IN PROCESS)
Code review (IN PROCESS September 2013)
Comprehensive Plan review (2014 -2015)
Reduce Fire Department overtime
(Work through Public Safety & Parks Committee)
Implement Passenger Only fast fernes
(Work through Kitsap Transit Board, Mayor & Council representative)
Restore Funding to Police and Fire Departments
(Work through Public Safety and Parks Committee, could be accomplished in 2013 budget cycle, zero
sum accounting which general fund activities would you remove funding from)
Increase Business, Mayor Industry and Employer recruitment (KEDA & KADA)
Fund Pendergast Park Field Drainage
(Work through Public Safety and Parks Committee, Parks funding task force recommendation, Refer to
Parks Commission survey)
Support EMS Levy
(Work through Public Safety and Parks Committee, very important must get the word out and educate
the citizens)
Improve Gateway Landscaping
(Work through Public Safety and Parks Committee, Image and first impression impacts)
Review Lodging Tax contract review procedures for possible improvements
(Work through Lodging Tax Committee)
Downtown Circulation Plan (All ready accomplished)
Reign in Healthcare Costs (Negotiated through contracts)
Beef up Auditor role (IN PROCESS)
Focus Areas
• Increase funding in Streets Department
• Develop list of priorities for Street Department
• Increase Marketing and Branding efforts
• Support Annexation efforts and begin Comprehensive plan review
• Discuss efforts assigned to Committee
• Fund Public Safety and Parks departments
______________________________________________________________
CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 Phone (360) 473-5280
August 28, 2013
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
5:00 PM in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603
The Study Session is open to the public but there will be no opportunities for input or participation; no
action is anticipated during the Study Session; and the content of these items is subject to change. If
approved by Council, the items will be placed on the September 4, 2013 Council Meeting Agenda:
A. NO PRESENTATION PLANNED - The following items are budgeted items or have been
reviewed by the appropriate Council Committee:
1. Interlocal Agreement between the City of Poulsbo and the City of Bremerton relating to the
Special Operations Group (SOG)
2. Interlocal agreement between the City of Poulsbo and the City of Bremerton relating to
Traffic Safety Operations.
3. Interlocal agreement between the City of Poulsbo and the City of Bremerton relating to
Marine Patrol services
B. FULL PRESENTATION ITEMS
4. Purchase of four (4) Handheld [Parking] Citation Devices from CiteZone.com (information
only)
5. Proposed public hearings (on September 4 and 18) to approve Letter of Agreement and
Lease for Pendergast Park Soccer Field to West Sound FC
6. Proposed public Hearing and resolution to recover fees for abatement costs on the property
located at 1926 North Callow Avenue
7. Proposed public hearing and ordinance to amend Title 20 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
(BMC) entitled "Zoning Code" related to SEPA Exemptions, Drive-through Requirements and
Commercial Setbacks
C. GENERAL COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Finance & Investment Committee Briefing (8/28/13 Meeting) - Eric Younger, Chair
2. Finalize 2014 City Council Goals - Greg Wheeler, Council President
3. Other General Council Business (As necessary...)
D. ADJOURNMENT OF STUDY SESSION
Americans with Disabilities Act accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations
should contact the City Clerk’s Office at (360) 473-5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Council meeting.
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Interlocal SOG Agreement between the City
of Poulsbo and the City of Bremerton
Study Session Date: August 28, 2013
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 4, 2013
Department: Police
Presenter: James Burchett
Phone: (360) 473-5225
SUMMARY: Interlocal agreement to create a collaborative effort between the Bremerton Police
Department and the City of Poulsbo Police Department to enhance joint investigative abilities in order
to more effectively identify, arrest and deter those members of our community involved in the use,
sale, manufacturing and distribution of narcotics, prostitution, gambling or criminal gang activity.
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Poulsbo to receive from Bremerton a sum equal to
seven percent (7%) of the yearly drug forfeiture cash and cash proceeds from sales of forfeited
property of all cases.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ No Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Poulsbo and authorize the Mayor to
finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/25/13
Page 1 of 4
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF BREMERTON AND
THE CITY OF POULSBO
This Interlocal Agreement is made and entered into pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 39.34
RCW by and between the City of Bremerton (“Bremerton”) and the City of Poulsbo (“Poulsbo”).
WHEREAS, this agreement is intended to create a collaborative effort between the City of
Poulsbo Police Department (“PPD”) and the City of Bremerton Police Department (“BPD”) to enhance
joint investigative abilities in order to more effectively identify, arrest and deter those members of our
community involved in the use, sale, manufacturing and distribution of narcotics, prostitution, gambling
or criminal gang activity.
NOW THEREFORE, Poulsbo and Bremerton, through their respective legislative bodies, do
hereby agree as follows:
1. Poulsbo shall assign, as department staffing levels permit, a full time officer to work in the BPD
Special Operations Group (“SOG”) to participate in narcotics, prostitution, gambling and gang
investigations. This understanding permits the Poulsbo police officer to work out of the SOG
office in Bremerton, Washington. SOG will target criminal activities that impact both the City
of Poulsbo and the City of Bremerton communities. These officers will liaise between the
agencies and facilitate a closer working relationship.
2. BPD recognizes that the assigned Poulsbo police officer has responsibilities with PPD and may
be required to provide investigative support, attend mandatory training, conduct investigations or
attend to other work related issues associated and required by Poulsbo.
3. BPD also recognizes that the assigned Poulsbo police officer has reporting responsibilities to
PPD regarding his or her delegated duties in SOG. Prior to reporting any information to PPD
regarding an ongoing SOG investigation or covert operation, the assigned Poulsbo police officer
will obtain approval from the SOG supervisor. This will allow Poulsbo and SOG superiors to
ensure that the investigation or operation is not compromised.
4. BPD will issue a limited police commission to the Poulsbo officer assigned to work with SOG.
This limited commission is authorized when assigned to SOG and gives authority to the Poulsbo
officer to enforce ordinances of the City of Bremerton and to protect the public peace within the
City of Bremerton. This commission is valid during work hours and for the duration of the
officer’s assignment. At the conclusion of this agreement all forms of identification and
authorization issued by the Bremerton Police Department will be returned and terminated.
5. PPD will issue a limited police commission to the Bremerton Police officers assigned to SOG.
This limited commission is authorized when assigned to SOG and gives authority to the
Bremerton officers to enforce ordinances of the City of Poulsbo and to protect the public peace
within the City of Poulsbo. This commission will be revoked upon the Bremerton officer leaving
SOG. At the conclusion of this agreement all forms of identification and authorization issued by
PPD will be returned and terminated.
Page 2 of 4
6. Law enforcement personnel assigned to SOG shall have such authority to enforce state laws
within the geographical area of the Cities of Bremerton and Poulsbo, or any other jurisdiction in
Washington, as is given them by the Washington Mutual Aid Peace Officers Powers Act,
R.C.W. 10.93.
7. PPD personnel assigned to SOG will adhere to the policies established by SOG and PPD and will
work under the day-to-day supervision of the SOG supervisor. Nevertheless, at all times, PPD
personnel assigned to SOG shall be considered employees of the PPD, which shall be solely and
exclusively responsible for that employee. All rights, duties and obligations of the employer
shall remain with PPD. The personnel assigned by PPD shall continue under the employment of
PPD for purposes of any losses, claims, damages, or liabilities arising out of or related to the
services provided to SOG or the activities of SOG.
8. Indemnification.
a. In executing this agreement, Poulsbo does not assume liability or responsibility for or in
any way release Bremerton from any liability or responsibility, which arises in whole or in part
from the existence, validity or effect of Bremerton ordinances, rules or regulations. If any such
cause, claim, suit, action or administrative proceeding is commenced, Bremerton shall defend the
same at its sole expense and if judgment is entered or damages are awarded against Bremerton,
Poulsbo, or both, Bremerton shall satisfy the same, including all chargeable costs and attorney's
fees.
b. In executing this agreement, Bremerton does not assume liability or responsibility for or
in any way release Poulsbo from any liability or responsibility, which arises in whole or in part
from the existence, validity or effect of Poulsbo ordinances, rules or regulations. If any such
cause, claim, suit, action or administrative proceeding is commenced, Poulsbo shall defend the
same at its sole expense and if judgment is entered or damages are awarded against Poulsbo,
Bremerton or both, Poulsbo shall satisfy the same, including all chargeable costs and attorney's
fees.
c. Poulsbo shall indemnify and hold harmless Bremerton and its officers, agents, and
employees, or any of them, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits liability, loss,
costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, which are caused by or result from a
negligent act or omission of Poulsbo, its officers, agents, and employees in performing services
pursuant to this agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, or
damage is brought against Bremerton or Bremerton and Poulsbo, Poulsbo shall defend the same
at its sole cost and expense; and if final judgment be rendered against Bremerton and its officers,
agents, and employees or jointly against Bremerton and Poulsbo and their respective officers,
agents, and employees Poulsbo shall satisfy the same.
d. Bremerton shall indemnify and hold harmless Poulsbo and its officers, agents, and
employees, or any of them, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss,
costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, which are caused by or result from a
negligent act or omission of Bremerton, its officers, agents, and employees in performing
services pursuant to this agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action,
loss, or damage is brought against Poulsbo or Bremerton and Poulsbo, Bremerton shall defend
the same at its sole cost and expense; and if final judgment be rendered against Poulsbo, and its
officers, agents, and employees or jointly against Poulsbo and Bremerton and their respective
officers, agents, and employees Bremerton shall satisfy the same.
Page 3 of 4
e. If a claim is made that both parties are responsible for all or a portion of damages alleged
to have been sustained as a result of acts or omissions of the parties hereto, then the above
referenced indemnity and hold harmless provisions shall apply only to the extent of the
proportion of liability attributable to the indemnifying party. If liability is not or cannot be
apportioned, then the parties shall be responsible for their own costs and attorneys fees incurred
in the matter and shall indemnify and hold the other party harmless for one half of any amount
awarded by the Court or other decision making body with jurisdiction as a result of the alleged
acts or omissions.
9. Poulsbo agrees to furnish and pay for service of a cellular system for its assigned agent that is
compatible to cellular equipment utilized by SOG.
10. Bremerton will provide workspace and work station with required computer equipment and
maintenance support for the assigned Poulsbo officer.
11. Bremerton, through its SOG supervisor, shall maintain a fund of ready cash so that day-to-day
needs of SOG can be met. The Poulsbo officer assigned to SOG will be apportioned imprest
monies from the fund by the SOG supervisor, in accordance with SOG polices, to conduct
controlled narcotics purchases and other authorized official business. The assigned Poulsbo
officer will be accountable for the proper handling of the funds in accordance with SOG policy
and will be subject to audit.
12. For operational necessity, the assigned Poulsbo officer will be authorized to participate in SOG
required training and meetings.
13. The Poulsbo officer assigned to SOG pursuant to this agreement will receive compensation from
Poulsbo only, and is prohibited from receiving compensation in any form, from SOG or any
other source.
14. The terms of this agreement will commence as of the date signed by both parties. This
agreement can be terminated at any time with 30 days written notice by either party with the
understanding that all reasonable attempts will be made not to jeopardize personnel and active
undercover operations.
15. The parties do not intend to create through this Agreement a separate legal entity subject to suit.
16. Drug forfeiture cash and cash proceeds from sales of property forfeited as a result SOG
operations pursuant to RCW 69.50.505 shall be placed into a forfeiture fund managed by
Bremerton. Such monies shall remain subject to the use restrictions of RCW 69.50.505 in the
hands of each party until fully expended for the law enforcement purposes permitted in RCW
69.50.505.
17. Poulsbo shall receive from Bremerton a sum equal to seven percent (7%) of the yearly drug
forfeiture cash and cash proceeds from sales of forfeited property of all cases. The seven percent
is calculated after deduction of the State of Washington remittance required by RCW
69.50.505(9).
Page 4 of 4
18. BPD will issue tactical equipment that is available within the SOG quartermaster system. All
other officer equipment will be purchased by and the responsibility of PPD.
19. BPD will assign a SOG unmarked / undercover vehicle to the Poulsbo officer. Fuel and
maintenance will be the responsibility of the PPD.
20. Poulsbo shall be responsible for record keeping, reporting, managing and dispersing of funds it
receives from the forfeiture fund in accordance with the restrictions and provisions of RCW
69.50.505.
21. The Chiefs of BPD and PPD, or their designees, will meet each quarter, or as needed, for the
purpose of reviewing and discussing the operations and performance of SOG.
Signatures of approving authorities.
Dated this ___________ day of _________________ 2013
___________________________________ _____________________________
Alan Townsend Steven Strachan
Chief of Police Chief of Police
City of Poulsbo City of Bremerton Police Department
___________________________________ ______________________________
Becky Erickson Patty Lent
Mayor, City of Poulsbo Mayor, City of Bremerton
R:\Legal\Legal\Contracts\Police\SOG - Poulsbo interlocal Agreement bremerton Edits 6-24-13 - Final.doc
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement between
the City of Poulsbo and the City of
Bremerton relating to Traffic Safety
Operations
Study Session Date: August 28, 2013
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 4, 2013
Department: Police
Presenter: Chief Strachan
Phone: 473-5750
SUMMARY: This agreement confers authority on City of Poulsbo police officers to enforce State and
locals laws and ordinances within the City of Bremerton for the purpose of mutual aid traffic safety
enforcement and education.
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement signed by the City of Poulsbo.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): There are no fiscal impacts, as mutual aid will only
occur with on-duty officers.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ No Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Poulsbo and authorize the Mayor to
finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/25/13
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement between
the City of Poulsbo and the City of
Bremerton relating to Marine Patrol Services
Study Session Date: August 28,2013
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 4, 2013
Department: Police
Presenter: Chief Strachan
Phone: 473-5750
SUMMARY: This agreement confers authority to the City of Poulsbo Police Department Marine
Patrol to patrol waters within the Bremerton city limits for the purposes of enforcing applicable laws
and ordinances, promoting boating safety, and preventing law and safety violations.
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement signed by the City of Poulsbo.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Due to the mutual interest of and benefit to both
parties in public safety for the community, no monetary compensation will be paid for these services.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☒ No Presentation ☐ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
Move to approve the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Poulsbo and authorize the Mayor to
finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/25/13
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Purchase of four (4) handheld
citation devices from CiteZone.com (info
only)
Study Session Date: 8/28/13
COUNCIL MEETING Date: N/A
Department: Finance/City Clerk
Presenter: Shannon Corin
Phone: 473-5323
SUMMARY: The City issued an RFP for four (4) handheld citation devices closing on July 22, 2013.
The best proposal meeting our requirements is from CiteZone.com for the Motorola MC75A handheld
and Zebra RW420 Thermal Printers for a cost of under $22,000. This cost includes the purchase of
the four (4) handhelds with printers, accessories for the equipment, 3 year software cost, 3 year
maintenance on hardware and software and $1,000 trade-in on current equipment. Continuing
annual cost is estimated at $1,400 per year for paper and envelopes for the handhelds. After the third
year, software and maintenance annual cost is estimated at $2,300 per year.
ATTACHMENTS: Proposal and proposal comparison
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): $22,000 from the Parking System fund. Currently
there is $688,000 available in the fund to purchase the equipment. Current O&M costs for our current
handhelds and system is $24,000 per year. Estimated future O&M costs is $4,000 per year.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ No Discussion ☒ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☐ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
No Action Required – Information Only
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 11/02/12
CiteZone Aparc Duncan Cardinal
4 handheld citation devices with field printer &
camera
Motorola MC75A
w/Zebra RW420 Printer
Motorola MC65
w/Zebra RW420
Printer
AutoCITE X3 Casio IT9000
Equipment Cost $8,252 $10,704 $14,094 $11,192
Accessories Cost $633 $756 incl $488
SOFTWARE IssueZone TicketManager AutoISSUE TickeTrak
Required
a. Handheld software must provide a user-
friendly interface for ease of use and durability.
x x x x
b. Handheld software must be completely
configurable so that the department may select
data entry fields and make them a required
entry, an optional entry, or an unused field.
x x x x
c. The software must require a
password/security sign on.
x x x x
d. The system must support entry of
information such as vehicle make,model,color,
style,plate type,violation,void and standard
codes.The citation entry screen must be a
selectable format such as drop down menus.
x x x Exception -- can
only do voids on
PC
e. The system must easily allow the user to
display all citation data entered to that point and
to edit or modify any field without disruption of
the citation entry process.
x x x x
f. The system must allow the user to view and
void any citation written by the user since the
last upload of data to the host.A valid void code
must be entered for the voiding of any
completed citation.The system must support the
reprinting of an issued citation,this reprinted
citation must contain the same time as the
original citation not simply the time it was re-
printed.The system must be able to produce a
voided ticket audit trail.
x x x Exception -- can
only do voids on
PC
g. When the license plate is entered during a
citation entry,the system must automatically
search the customer,vehicle,and scofflaw
request file for a match.If a match is found,the
customer and vehicle information should be
automatically entered into the proper data fields
without additional keying by the officer.If a
match is found in the scofflaw request file,the
system must display the number of citations in
the last 90 days.
x x x x
CiteZone Aparc Duncan Cardinal
4 handheld citation devices with field printer &
camera
Motorola MC75A
w/Zebra RW420 Printer
Motorola MC65
w/Zebra RW420
Printer
AutoCITE X3 Casio IT9000
h. The system must support monitoring of
vehicles in a fixed time zone.The system must
maintain a file of license plate numbers in a fixed
time zone and display the elapsed time and
previous location of the vehicle.The software
should allow the user to enter the citation entry
module directly from the chalking module with
one keystroke.
x x x x
i. All transactions must be time stamped by
the systems internal clock.
x x x x
j. The system must support the issuance and
tracking of warnings as well as actual citations.
x x x x
k. The system must support standard location
codes and descriptions,location comments,
block numbers,and meter numbers.Location
descriptions should be used in a drop down
menu format.Locations shall also be manually
generated when necessary.
x x x x
m. The handheld must have a level of security
which provides the officer a sign on to prevent
unauthorized use.
x x x x
o. The software shall allow the user to select
whether they wish to check for multiple citations
to the same vehicle in the same day and notify
the officer of the previous citation.
x x x x
Optional
l. The system should be configurable by
authorized personnel to allow field personnel to
modify the standard violation fine.The system
shall only allow one fine per citation.
PC only x x PC only
n. The system should have a field for officer
comments which can be preprogrammed into
the system “canned”or free form comments.
The Officer shall have a choice for these to print
on the citation or simply show in the system.
Option for same comment to repeat from
citation to citation if selected.
x x x Exception -
comments do not
repeat from
citation to citation
p. The handheld should support presentation of
citation data entry screens according to a user-
specified order.
x x x x
q. The handheld should have drop down menu
choices for all US States and Canadian Provinces.
This list should be able to allow for those most
utilized to be placed in order of use.
x x x x
CiteZone Aparc Duncan Cardinal
4 handheld citation devices with field printer &
camera
Motorola MC75A
w/Zebra RW420 Printer
Motorola MC65
w/Zebra RW420
Printer
AutoCITE X3 Casio IT9000
r. The software should provide the ability to
take an unlimited number of color or non-color
snapshots.The software must automatically
download the snapshots and associate to the
appropriate citation record.
x x
incl FTP photo
transfer with ticket
($18,000 incl. in
Software Costs)
x x
Software Cost $8,000 $37,160 $3,000 $16,721
Data Import/Export Yes Yes Yes Yes
Work with CodeSmart Yes Yes Yes Provide a XML file
or fixed length
export file
Hardware & Software Maintenance Support
Years 3 5 5 5
After hours support Hardware Yes, Software
No
Yes No
Maintenance Cost $3,307 $764/mo $8,480 $5,396
Total Purchase Price $19,559 $66,620 $31,574 $37,854
OPTIONAL COSTS
Monthly Lease Option $600 $1,383 $828 Lease Option is for
two installments
with 50% Down
payment
Installation $500/day + travel
expenses
$12,000 $3,000 $3,500
Paper Products $1,640 $224 $2,253 $1,045
Trade-In $1,000 n/a $425 n/a
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Public Hearings to approve the
Letter of Agreement and Lease for
Pendergast Park Soccer Field with
West Sound FC Premier Soccer Club
Study Session Date: August 28, 2013
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 4, 2013 &
September 18, 2013
Department: Parks and Rec.
Presenter: Wyn Birkenthal
Phone: 473-5752
SUMMARY: Pendergast Soccer Fields have been an underused asset since they were constructed
in the 1990’s. West Sound FC has agreed to make artificial turf improvements to the 2 fields in return
for a lease allowing West Sound to collect revenue from field scheduling once the turf is installed.
Additionally, the city would receive $13,537.00 per year in compensation and maintenance fees for
the duration of the agreement. The payment amount will be adjusted for inflation. Public use of the
fields is guaranteed under section 2.1 of the lease.
ATTACHMENTS: Letter of Agreement for lease, Pendergast Soccer Field Lease; Exhibit A-Legal
Description and Map; Exhibit B-Leased Area and Parking; Exhibit C-Lease and Maintenance Fee
Calculation Worksheet
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The city will be relieved of soccer field maintenance
responsibility and receive $13,537.00 annually in compensation and maintenance fees.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ No Presentation ☒ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☒ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
September 4, 2013 – 1st Public Hearing – No Action
September 18, 2013 – 2nd Public Hearing
Move to approve the Letter of Agreement for lease and the Lease with West Sound FC Premier
Soccer Club for the Pendergast soccer fields and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute both
the Letter of Agreement and the Lease with substantially the same terms and conditions as
presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/25/13
Letter of Agreement
Between City of Bremerton
and West Sound FC Premier Soccer Club
for the Lease of Soccer Fields
This letter of Agreement between the City of Bremerton (“City”) and West Sound FC
Premier Soccer Club (“Lessee”) relates to the lease, attached hereto as Exhibit A, of two (2)
soccer fields and associated property at Pendergast Park.
This Letter of Agreement serves the purpose of allowing Lessee to obtain a commitment
from the City to enter into the attached lease in order to enable procurement of grant and
foundation funds by Lessee to make the agreed upon improvements to Pendergast Park. It also
provides for continued use of the fields by the City until such time as the Lease is executed and
construction is imminent.
By this Letter of Agreement, the parties stipulate that they will not execute the lease
agreement until such time as Lessee has accumulated the financial and in-kind resources
necessary to begin construction of the artificial turf improvements to the two (2) soccer fields.
This Letter of Agreement will expire on June 30, 2015. If the lease is not executed by said date,
any and all rights to the lease by Lessee shall expire. During the interim period, prior to full
execution of the attached lease, the City will continue to have full right to use, maintain, and
schedule the soccer fields. Lessee shall have no right or interest in the fields until the Lease is
fully executed.
This Letter of Agreement and attached lease are subject to approval of the City Council
prior to execution of this letter.
Approved by City Council _________________, 2013.
CITY OF BREMERTON
______________________________________
By: Patty Lent
Its: Mayor
Date:_________________________________
WESTSOUND FC PREMIER SOCCER
CLUB
_____________________________________
By:__________________________________
Its:__________________________________
Date:________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Roger A. Lubovich, City Attorney
R:\Legal\Legal\Files\Current Active Files\Pendergast Park\WestSound FC Premier Soccer Club Lease\Letter of Agreement -
WestSound FC Premier Soccer Lease.docx
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
11
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
PENDERGAST SOCCER FIELD LEASE
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT (hereinafter “Lease”) is between the CITY OF
BREMERTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, with offices located at 345
6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, Washington 98337 (hereinafter “City”), and WESTSOUND
FC PREMIER SOCCER CLUB, a non-profit corporation ,, (hereinafter “Lessee”).
1. PROPERTY.
1.1 Property Defined. The City leases to Lessee and Lessee leases from the City the
real property consisting of 5.93 acres encompassing 2 fields and buffer area described in Exhibit
A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, together with all the rights of the
City, if any, to improvements on and easements benefiting the property but subject to the
exceptions and restrictions set forth in this Lease (collectively the "Property" or “Leased
Property”).
1.2 Survey, Maps, and Plans. Lessee is not relying upon and the City is not making
any representations about any survey, plat, diagram, and/or legal description provided by the
City.
1.3 Acceptance of Property. The City makes no representation regarding the
condition of the Property, or the improvements located on the Property. Lessee has examined the
Property and accepts it in its present condition.
2. USE.
2.1 Permitted Use. The Property shall be used for soccer or compatible sports,
practice, games, and tournaments, and for concessions to service the aforementioned uses. (the
"Permitted Use") and for no other business or purpose, without the prior written consent of the
City. The Property shall not be used for illegal purposes. It is agreed that this lease shall not be
construed as the City’s waiver of land use or building code provisions that would otherwise apply
to any improvements or uses of the site.
The Lessee is responsible for scheduling the Property including fields and lighting. It is
understood by the parties that the Lessee will work cooperatively with the City to establish
guidelines outlining field use priority for school teams, current users of the Pendergast soccer
fields, Bremerton based organizations, etc. Lessee shall be entitled to revenue derived from field
and light rental and concession proceeds, with the exception of the consideration to the City.
Lessee shall allow for community access for use of the Property by non-members at
reasonable times and rates not to exceed averages for similar artificial turfed soccer facilities in
the Kitsap-Pierce County area. Scheduling priority for non-member usage will be in the
following order:
1) Bremerton based youth recreational soccer;
2) Youth recreational soccer;
3) Adult recreational soccer;
4) School and collegiate soccer;
5) Other recreational sports as appropriate for artificial turf play; and
6) Professional and semi-professional soccer and field sports.
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
22
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
2.2 Parking Lot. Along with use of the Property, Lessee shall be entitled to the non-
exclusive use of the lighted parking area so described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference herein.
2.3 Conformance with Laws. Lessee shall, at all times, keep current and comply with
all conditions and terms of any permits, licenses, certificates, regulations, ordinances, statutes,
and other government rules and regulations regarding its use or occupancy of the Property.
2.4 Liens and Encumbrances. Lessee shall keep the Property free and clear of any
liens and encumbrances arising out of or relating to its use or occupancy of the Property. At the
City’s request, Lessee shall furnish the City with written proof of payment or any item which
would or might constitute the basis for such a lien on the leased Property if not paid.
2.5 Use Restrictions. The Lessee shall not carry on upon the demised Property, any
trade or activity, which would constitute a nuisance or hazard to the public, and shall not
substantially deviate from its announced and original use of the property, without consultation
and consent from the City.
2.6 Alcohol. No alcohol is to be served or consumed on the leased Property unless
authorized by BMC 13.04.140.
3. TERM.
3.1 Term. The term of this Lease is fifteen (15) years (the “initial term”), beginning
on the ______ day of _____________, 20____ (the "commencement date"), and ending on the
_______ day of _________, 20___ (the "termination date"), unless terminated sooner under the
terms of this Lease.
33..22 Extension of Term. Prior to the expiration of the Initial term of this lease, Lessee
may request to extend the term of this lease in the event Lessee desires to replace the artificial
turf on the play fields in order to amortize the cost. A request to extend the term of the lease
must be made prior to installation of the artificial turf. Any extension is subject to mutual
agreement of the parties regarding the lease payment and other terms and conditions and is
further subject to City Council approval. There is no guarantee of an extension of the term of
this lease beyond the initial term.
3.3 End of Term. Upon the expiration or termination of the term of this lease, as
applicable, Lessee shall surrender the Property to the City in the same or better condition as
existed on the commencement date, reasonable wear and tear excepted.
3.5 Hold Over. If Lessee remains in possession of the Property after the termination
date, the occupancy shall not constitute an extension or renewal of the term. The occupancy shall
be a month-to-month tenancy, on terms identical to the terms of this Lease, which may be
terminated by either party on thirty (30) days written notice. The monthly rent during the
holdover shall be the same rent which would be due if the Lease were still in effect and all
adjustments in rent were made in accordance with its terms. If the City provides a notice to
vacate the Property in anticipation of the termination of this Lease or at any time after the
termination date and Lessee fails to do so within the time set forth in the notice, then Lessee shall
be a trespasser and shall owe the City all amounts due under applicable law.
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
33
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
4. CONSIDERATION.
4.1 Lease Payment. During the Initial Term of this lease, Lessee shall pay to the City
a monthly lease payment of nine hundred nineteen dollars and 75/100 ($919.75) based on the
factors as set forth in Exhibit C, aattttaacchheedd hheerreettoo aanndd iinnccoorrppoorraatteedd bbyy tthhiiss rreeffeerreennccee hheerreeiinn (“lease
payment”). The first installment shall be due and payable on or before the commencement date,
and subsequent installments shall be due and payable on or before the same day of each month
thereafter. LLeesssseeee sshhaallll aallssoo ppaayy LLeeaasseehhoolldd EExxcciissee TTaaxx sseett ffoorrtthh iinn SSeeccttiioonn 44..22 bbeellooww.. The lease
payment shall be adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as set forth in Section 4.3 below.
4.2 Leasehold Tax. Lessee agrees to pay the leasehold excise tax on the lease
payment pursuant to Chapter 82.29A RCW currently in the amount of 12.84 percent and as may
be adjusted pursuant to Ch. 82.29A RCW.
4.3 Consumer Price Index (CPI) Adjustment. The lease payment will be adjusted by
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as published by the United
States Department of Labor for Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton. For purposes of the CPI adjustment,
the base shall be the June 2012 CPI index. The CPI adjustment shall occur on the following
January 1st of each year during the term of this Agreement. In no instance shall the adjustment be
negative. In addition, Lessee agrees to pay when due, the leasehold excise tax, or any additional
assessments thereto, with respect to any payment or obligation hereunder, which is deemed by
the State of Washington to be taxable rent under said chapter and to indemnify and hold the
Lessor harmless from the same.
4.4 Payment. Lessee shall pay quarterly to the City by the fifteenth day of the month
following the end of each quarter, or as otherwise required by the State of Washington, the
amount of the leasehold tax owing. Lessee may prepay these quarterly payments on a semi-
annual or annual basis or as otherwise approved by the City.
4.5 Payment Place. Payment is to be made to the City of Bremerton, Attn:
Department of Financial Services, 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, Washington 98337.
5. UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AND TAXES.
During the Term, Lessee shall pay the following additional expenses:
55..11 Utilities. Lessee shall pay all fees charged for utilities in connection with the use
and occupancy of the Property, including but not limited to electricity, stormwater, water, gas,
and telephone service. In addition, Lessee shall pay City the following:
Soccer field lighting controller $500 per year
Lighting maintenance (parking lot) $1,000 per year
Parking lot maintenance & repair $1,000 per year
These annual expenses to the City shall be made in equal monthly payments in
conjunction with the lease payment. These payments shall be adjusted by the Consumer Price
Index (CPI) as set forth in Section 4.3 above.
5.2 Taxes. Lessee shall be liable for, and shall pay, throughout the term of this lease
before delinquency, all license and excise fees and occupation taxes covering the business
conducted on the Property and taxes that may be on leasehold improvements created under this
lease agreement.
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
44
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
5.3 Proof of Payment. Lessee shall, if required by the City, furnish to the City
receipts or other appropriate evidence establishing the payment of any amounts required to be
paid under the terms of this Lease.
5.5 Failure to Pay. If Lessee fails to pay any of the amounts due under this Lease, the
City may pay the amount due, and recover its cost in accordance with the provisions of Section 6,
unless Lessee has contested any amount due pursuant to Section 5.3 above.
6. LATE PAYMENTS AND OTHER CHARGES.
6.1 Late Charge. If any rental payment is not received by the City within ten (10)
days of the date due, Lessee shall pay to the City a late charge equal to four percent (4%) of the
amount of the lease payment due to defray the overhead expenses of the City incident to the
delay.
6.2 Interest Penalty for Past Due Lease Payments and Other Sums Owed. If a Lease
Payment is not paid within thirty (30) days of the date due, then Lessee shall, in addition to
paying the late charges determined under Subsection 6.1, above, pay interest on the amount
outstanding at the rate of one percent (1%) per month until paid. If the City pays or advances any
amounts for or on behalf of Lessee, including but not limited to leasehold taxes, taxes,
assessments, insurance premiums, costs of removal and disposal of unauthorized materials, costs
of removal and disposal of improvements pursuant to Section 7 below, or other amounts not paid
when due, Lessee shall reimburse the City for the amount paid or advanced and shall pay interest
on that amount at the rate of one percent (1%) per month from the date the City notifies Lessee of
the payment or advance unless Lessee has contested any amount due pursuant to Section 5.3
above.
6.3 No Counterclaim, Setoff, or Abatement of Rent. Except as expressly set forth
elsewhere in this Lease, rent and all other sums payable by Lessee pursuant to this Lease shall be
paid without the requirement that the City provide prior notice or demand, and shall not be
subject to any counterclaim, setoff, deduction, defense or abatement.
7. IMPROVEMENTS.
7.1 Lessee-Owned Improvements - Ownership. So long as this Lease remains in
effect, Lessee shall retain ownership of all authorized improvements and trade fixtures it may
place on the Property (collectively "Lessee-Owned Improvements"). Lessee-Owned
Improvements shall not include any construction, reconstruction, alteration, or addition to the
Property by the City (City-Owned Improvements) or any Unauthorized Improvements as defined
in Subsection 7.6 below. No Lessee-Owned Improvements shall be placed on the Property
without the City's prior written consent. All Lessee-Owned Improvements upon the Property will
revert to the ownership of the City, without payment by the City, at the expiration of the lease or
its earlier termination. However, if the City terminates the lease without cause prior to the
expiration of the Initial Term, Lessee will be entitled to a payment equal to the depreciated value
of the Lessee-Owned Improvements with the parties agreeing that all such improvements,
including the artificial turf, have a 15 (fifteen) year life expectancy.
7.2 Soccer Fields. Lessee agrees to make capital improvements to (2) soccer fields
by upgrading sand fields to artificial turf fields. Plans for permanent improvements shall be
approved in writing by the City in advance.
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
55
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
7.3 Restrooms. The parties agree that permanent restroom facilities in proximity to
the soccer fields are needed and agree to work cooperatively toward the development of
restrooms. In the interim the Lessee shall be responsible for the provision of portable chemical
toilets as needed to meet public health requirements and user convenience. And the City shall
continue to maintain the pit toilet located at the parking area until this toilet is no longer needed.
7.4 Signs. No signs or other advertising material shall be attached to or painted on or
within the leased Property without the approval of the City, except warning signs, advertising on
perimeter fencing, facility rules and regulations, signs identifying the name of the Property and
facilities at the Property. At the termination, or sooner expiration of this lease, all such signs or
advertising material attached to or painted by the Lessee shall be removed by Lessee at its own
expense, and Lessee shall repair any damage or injury to the Property, and correct any unsightly
condition, caused by maintenance and removal of said signs.
7.5 Construction. Lessee is responsible for permitting, design, construction and
maintenance of improvements. Prior to Lessee commencing any construction, alteration,
replacement, removal or major repair of any improvements (whether City-Owned or Lessee-
Owned), Lessee shall submit to the City plans and specifications which describe the proposed
activity. Construction shall not commence until the City Director of Parks and Recreation
Department or the Director of Community Development, as applicable, for permitting purposes,
or their designee) has approved those plans and specifications in writing The City shall have
thirty (30) days in which to review the proposed plans and specifications. The plans and
specifications shall be deemed approved and the requirement for the City’s written consent shall
be treated as waived, unless the City notifies Lessee otherwise within the thirty (30) days. Upon
completion of construction, Lessee shall promptly provide the City with as-built plans and
specifications. The City’s consent and approval shall not be required for any routine
maintenance or repair of improvements made by the Lessee pursuant to its obligation to maintain
the Property in good order and repair that does not result in the construction, alteration,
replacement, removal, or major repair of any improvements on the Property. The provisions of
this section do not obviate any permit requirements that may apply to the proposed activity.
7.6 Unauthorized Improvements. Improvements made on the Property without the
City's prior consent pursuant to Subsection 7.4 or which are not in conformance with the plans
submitted to and approved by the City ("Unauthorized Improvements") shall immediately
become the property of the City, unless the City elects otherwise. Regardless of ownership of
Unauthorized Improvements, the City may, at its option, require Lessee to sever, remove, and
dispose of them, charge Lessee rent for the use of them, or both. If Lessee fails to remove an
Unauthorized Improvement upon request, the City may remove it and charge Lessee for the cost
of removal and disposal.
8. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES – INDEMNITY.
8.1 Lessee shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from and against any and all
claims, demands, damages, losses, liens, liabilities, penalties, fines, lawsuits, and costs and
expenses which accrue to or are incurred by the City which arise directly or indirectly from the
discovery or cleanup of hazardous substances from the Property which are deposited on the
Property during the term of this Lease. City shall indemnify and hold harmless the Lessee from
and against any and all claims, demands, damages, losses, liens, liabilities, penalties, fines,
lawsuits, and costs and expenses which involve the placement of hazardous substances upon the
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
66
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
Property prior to or after the termination or expiration of this lease. The provisions of this
section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Lease.
8.2 Hazardous substance shall mean any waste or material defined or designated as
hazardous, toxic or dangerous by any federal, state or local statute, regulation or ordinance
presently in effect or adopted during the term of this Lease.
9. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING.
9.1 City Consent Required. Except for field use rentals and related concession
rentals, Lessee shall not sell, convey, mortgage, assign, pledge, sublet, or otherwise transfer or
encumber all or any part of Lessee's interest in this Lease or the Property without the City's prior
written consent, which may not be unreasonably withheld by the City. In the event of such
consent, each permitted transferee shall assume all obligations under this Lease, including the
any lease payment. No assignment, sublet, or transfer shall release, discharge, or otherwise affect
the liability of Lessee.
9.2 Lease Payments Following Assignment. The acceptance by the City of any lease
payment following an assignment or other transfer shall not constitute consent to any assignment
or transfer.
9.3 Renting of Property. Lessee has the right to rent the Property on a per hour basis
and retain revenue from such rental. Property may not be rented to a third party for other than
standard field rental without the advanced written approval of the City.
10. INDEMNITY.
10.1 The City shall not be liable for any injury to any person or for any loss of or
damage to any property (including property of Lessee) occurring in or about the leased Property
or the buildings thereon and caused by or resulting from any act or omission by Lessee, any
officer, agent, employee, guest, invitee, or visitor of Lessee; and, during the full term hereof,
Lessee agrees and covenants to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and those persons
who were, now are, or shall be duly elected or appointed officials or members or employees or
agents thereof, against and from any loss, damage, costs, charge, expense, liability, claim,
demand, or judgments of whatsoever kind or nature (including attorney’s fees and costs) whether
to persons or property, to the extent arising on said Property, in or on said building(s), or on any
areas adjoining the same, which is under the control or use of Lessee pursuant to this Lease and
arising out of or in connection with Lessee’s use and occupancy of said Property. City agrees
and covenants to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Lessee, its officers, employees, and
agents thereof, against and from any loss, damage, costs, charge, expense, liability, claim,
demand, or judgment of whatsoever kind or nature whether to persons or property, arising out of
or in connection with the City’s negligence in its performance under this Agreement.
10.2 Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Lease is subject to
RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons
or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of Lessee and the
City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Lessee’s liability hereunder shall be
only to the extent of the Lessee’s negligence.
10.3 IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT
THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE LESSEE’S WAIVER
OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51, RCW, SOLELY FOR THE
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
77
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the
parties.
The provisions of Section 10 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease.
11. INSURANCE.
11.1 General Commercial Liability Insurance. Lessee agrees to procure and maintain
in force during the term of this Lease and any extension thereof, at its expense, general
commercial general liability insurance. This insurance shall be adequate to protect against
liability for damage claims through public use of or from accidents or other liability arising out of
Lessee’s use or occupancy of the Property and buildings thereon. This insurance shall be in a
minimum amount of $2,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and $4,000,000 aggregate
for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage which may be covered under a blanket
policy. Lessee agrees that, if such insurance policies are not kept in force during the term of this
Lease and any extension thereof, the City may procure the necessary insurance, pay the premium
therefor, and that such premium shall be repaid to the City on demand. The City shall be named
as an additional insured as to liability arising out of the Property and buildings thereon and the
insurance of Lessee shall be the primary insurance as to said liability.
11.2 Lessee’s Property Insurance .. Lessee shall purchase and maintain for the term of
the lease, property insurance covering any improvements to the premises for their full
replacement value.
11.3 Certificate of Insurance. Lessee shall provide to the City documentary evidence,
certified by the insurer, of all insurance(s) required in this Lease.
11.4 Subrogation. The City shall not be liable to Lessee (by way of subrogation or
otherwise) or to any insurance company insuring the other party for any loss or damage to any
building, structure, or other tangible property, or any resulting loss of income, or losses under
worker’s compensation laws and benefits, if any such loss or damage is covered by insurance
benefiting the party suffering such loss or damage or was required to be covered by insurance
pursuant to this Lease. Lessee shall, upon obtaining the policies of insurance required give
notice to the insurance carrier or carriers that the foregoing mutual waiver of subrogation is
contained in this Lease.
12. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR.
12.1 The City's Repairs. The City shall not be required to make any alterations,
maintenance, replacements, or repairs in, on, or about the Property, or any part thereof, during the
term.
12.2 Lessee's Repairs, Alteration, Maintenance and Replacement.
(a) Lessee shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep and maintain the Property
and all improvements (regardless of ownership) in good order and repair, in a clean, attractive,
and safe condition.
(b) Lessee shall, at its sole cost and expense, make any and all additions,
repairs, alterations, maintenance, replacements, or changes to the Property or to any
improvements on the Property which may be required by any public authority.
(c) All additions, repairs, alterations, replacements or changes to the Property
and to any improvements on the Property shall be made in accordance with, and ownership shall
be governed by, Section 7, above.
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
88
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
13. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION.
13.1 In the event of any damage to or destruction of the Property or any improvements,
Lessee shall promptly give written notice to the City.
13.2 In the event fire, storm, earthquake or other cause does damage to the
improvements on the demised Property, the Lessee may elect to make such repairs as are
necessary to restore improvements to a safe, neat and useable condition. Otherwise, the City may
elect to terminate this lease by giving notice to the Lessee in writing if the Property is not
restored within a reasonable time after the date of the casualty. City will be responsible for
repairing City-owned improvements, roads, parking, and utilities as elsewhere within the park. If
the park should be abandoned because of severe damage, then the lease shall be terminated and
the Lessee may remove the artificial turf and Lessee’s improvements that are not permanently
affixed to the Property.
13.2 Unless this Lease is terminated, there shall be no abatement or reduction in rent
due to any damage or destruction of the Property.
14. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES.
14.1 Acts Constituting Default. Lessee shall be in default of this Lease on the
occurrence of any of the following:
(a) Failure to pay Rent or other expenses when due;
(b) Failure to comply with any law, regulation, policy, or order of any lawful
governmental authority;
(c) Failure to comply with any other provision of this Lease;
(d) Failure to cure a default pursuant to Section 14.2 below; or
(e) Proceedings are commenced by or against Lessee under any bankruptcy
act or for the appointment of a trustee or receiver of Lessees' property.
14.2 Failure to Cure. A default shall become an event of default ("Event of Default") if
Lessee fails to cure the default within thirty (30) days after the City provides Lessee with written
notice of default, which specifies the nature of the default
14.3 City’s Remedies upon Default. Upon an Event of Default, the City may terminate
this Lease and remove Lessee by summary proceedings or otherwise. The City may also, without
terminating this Lease, relet the Property on any terms and conditions as the City in its sole
discretion may decide are appropriate. If the City elects to relet, rent received by it shall be
applied: (1) to the payment of any indebtedness other than rent due from Lessee to the City; (2) to
the payment of any cost of such reletting; (3) to the payment of the cost of any alterations and
repairs to the Property; and, (4) to the payment of rent and leasehold excise tax due and unpaid
under this Lease. Any balance shall be held by the City and applied to Lessee's future rent as it
becomes due. Lessee shall be responsible for any deficiency created by the reletting during any
month and shall pay the deficiency monthly. The City's reentry or repossession of the Property
under this subsection shall not be construed as an election to terminate this Lease or cause a
forfeiture of rents or other charges to be paid during the balance of the term, unless the City gives
a written notice of termination to Lessee or termination is decreed by legal proceedings. The
City may at any time after reletting elect to terminate this Lease for the previous Event of
Default.
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
99
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
15. ENTRY BY THE CITY. The City shall have the right to enter the Property at any
reasonable hour to inspect for compliance with the terms of this Lease upon twenty-four (24)
hours notice. The City and/or City’s agents shall comply with all of Lessee’s work safety rules
and restrictions, including but not limited to following Lessee’s warning instructions and,
without prior approval of the Lessee, keep out of restricted areas of the Property due to pesticide,
fertilizer, and other chemical and hazardous substance exposures on the Property.
16. NOTICE. Any notices required or permitted under this Lease may be personally
delivered, delivered by facsimile machine, or mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, to
the following addresses or to such other places as the parties may direct in writing from time to
time:
The City: City of Bremerton
Attn: Director of Parks and Recreation
680 Lebo Boulevard
Bremerton, Washington 98310
LLeesssseeee:: WestSound FC Soccer Club
P.O. Box 828
Silverdale, WA 98383
A notice shall be deemed given and delivered upon personal delivery, upon receipt of a
confirmation report if delivered by facsimile machine, or three (3) days after being mailed as set
forth above, whichever is applicable.
17. MISCELLANEOUS.
17.1 Authority. Lessee and the person or persons executing this Lease on behalf of
Lessee represent that Lessee is qualified to do business in the State of Washington, that Lessee
has full right and authority to enter into this Lease, and that each and every person signing on
behalf of Lessee is authorized to do so.
17.2 Successors and Assigns. This Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
of the parties, their successors and assigns.
17.3 Entire Agreement. This Lease, including the exhibits and addenda, if any,
contains the entire agreement of the parties. All prior and contemporaneous agreements,
promises, representations, and statements relating to this transaction or to the Property, if any, are
merged into this Lease.
17.4 Waiver. The waiver by the City of any breach or default of any term, covenant, or
condition of this Lease shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such term, covenant, or condition;
of any subsequent breach or default of the same; or of any other term, covenant, or condition of
this Lease. The City’s acceptance of a rental payment shall not be construed to be a waiver of
any preceding or existing breach other than the failure to pay the particular rental payment that
was accepted.
17.5 Cumulative Remedies. The rights and remedies of the City under this Lease are
cumulative and in addition to all other rights and remedies afforded to the City by law or equity
or otherwise.
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
1100
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
17.6 Time is of the Essence. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE as to each and every
provision of this Lease.
17.7 Invalidity. If any provision of this Lease shall prove to be invalid, void, or illegal,
it shall in no way affect, impair, or invalidate any other provision of this Lease.
17.8 Applicable Law and Venue. This Lease shall be interpreted and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Any reference to a statute shall mean that
statute as presently enacted or hereafter amended or superseded. Venue for any action arising out
of or in connection with this Lease shall be in the Superior Court for Kitsap County, Washington.
17.9 Attorneys’ Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or
provisions herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney’s fees.
1177..1100 Entire Agreement – Amendments .. This agreement constitutes the whole
agreement between the City and Lessee. There are not terms, obligations, covenants or
conditions other than those contained herein. No modification or amendment of this agreement
shall be valid and effective without the written consent of both parties.
17.11 Survival of Covenants. The covenants contained herein survive the termination or
expiration of the Lease for the applicable statute of limitation periods.
17.12 Quiet Enjoyment. The City covenants and agrees that Lessee, upon performing
the terms and conditions of the Lease, may peacefully hold and enjoy the Property during said
term without any interruption by the City, its successors or assigns. City will use its best efforts
not to interfere with Lessee’s business or right of access to and from the Property during the term
of this Lease.
17.13 Non-Discrimination. The Lessee shall operate the Property in such a fashion to
insure that no person is discriminated against on the basis of sex, national origin, race, creed or
color. In addition, Lessee shall assure that no qualified person with a disability shall be
discriminated against in access to and use of the facility.
17.14 Recording of Short Form Lease. Neither the City nor Lessee may record this
Lease without the other’s prior approval, but the parties will at any time at the request of either
party promptly execute duplicate originals of an instrument, in recordable form, which will
constitute a short form of this lease, setting forth a description of the Property, the terms of this
lease and other provisions hereof, except the rental and other provisions as either party may
request, which may be recorded.
17.15. Duplicate Originals. This Lease Agreement may be executed in duplicate
originals.
THIS AGREEMENT requires the signature of all parties and is executed as of the date
of the last signature below.
CITY OF BREMERTON
______________________________________
By: Patty Lent
Its: Mayor
Date:_________________________________
WESTSOUND FC PREMIER SOCCER
CLUB
_____________________________________
By:__________________________________
Its:__________________________________
Date:________________________________
EEXXHHIIBBIITT AA
1111
PPeennddeerrggaasstt SSoocccceerr FFiieelldd LLeeaassee
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Roger A. Lubovich, City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) §
COUNTY OF KITSAP )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Patty Lent is the person who
appeared before me, and acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she
was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as Mayor of the City of
Bremerton to be the free and voluntary act of such City for the uses and purposes mentioned in
the instrument.
WITNESSETH my hand and seal this _______ day of _____________________, 201_.
__________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at .
My commission expires / / .
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) §
COUNTY OF KITSAP )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ____________________ is the
person who appeared before me, and acknowledged that (s)he signed this instrument, on oath
stated that (s)he was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it to be the free and
voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
WITNESSETH my hand and seal this _______ day of ______________________, 201_.
__________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at .
My commission expires / / .
R:\Legal\Legal\Files\Current Active Files\Pendergast Park\WestSound FC Premier Soccer Club Lease\WestSound FC Premier Soccer Center
Lease - 5-16-13 - Final.doc
APPROXIMATE
LEASE AREA
PENDERGAST REGIONAL PARK
WEST SOUND FC LEASE
LIGHTED
PARKING AREA
EXHIBIT C
PENDERGAST REGIONAL PARK
OUTDOOR SOCCER FIELDS (7 & 8)
PROPERTY VALUE AND LEASE CALCULATION
LAND VALUE CALCULATION
CONCESSION SITE AREA 256,417 SQ. FT.
SQ. FT. PER ACRE 43,560 SQ. FT.
CONCESSION SITE AREA 5.887 ACRES
PARCEL VALUATION (PER ACRE)$25,000 PER ACRE
CONCESSION SITE LAND VALUE $147,163
LEASE PAYMENT CALCULATION
CONCESSION SITE LAND VALUE $147,163
PREFERED RETURN ON LEASE 7.50%
ANNUAL LAND LEASE $11,037
CONCESSION CALCULATION
ANNUAL LAND LEASE $11,037 per year
SOCCER FIELD LIGHTING CONTROLLER $500 per year
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE (PARKING LOT)$1,000 per year
PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE & REPAIR $1,000 per year
TOTAL CONCESSION AMOUNT $13,537 per year
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Resolution
to recover fees for abatement costs on the
property located at 1926 N. Callow Avenue.
Study Session Date: August 28, 2013
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 4, 2013
Department: DCD
Presenter: Janet Lunceford
Phone: 473-5213
SUMMARY:
In July of 2013, the City contracted with TRS to secure the house and remove garbage, debris and
weeds from the property located at 1926 N. Callow Avenue, pursuant to an Order of Abatement
issued by Kitsap County Superior Court. The Order of Abatement allowed the City to enter the
property, perform the work, and lien the property for the costs of the action. The owner of the
property, Robert Bottorff, could not be located; service was made by publication. The cost charged
to the revolving abatement fund for this action totaled $6351.40, which includes the contract amount,
the advertising costs, process server costs, filing fees and administrative fees as specified in Rate
Table C of the Bremerton Municipal Code. The Notice of Hearing was advertised in the Kitsap Sun
on August 16, 2013, and was posted on the front door of the house on the property located at 1926
N. Callow. Council must now decide if the fees are just and reasonable, and how they should be
collected.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Resolution
Resolution Exhibit A:
Clerk’s Memo with Invoices and BMC Rate Table C
Order of Abatement from Kitsap County Superior Court, dated May 10, 2013
Order of Default from Kitsap County Superior Court, dated May 10, 2013
Declaration of Posting, dated August 14, 2013
Affidavit of Publication from Kitsap Sun, dated August 16, 2013
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
If not approved, the City’s abatement fund would suffer the deficit of not collecting these funds.
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ No Presentation ☒ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☒ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to adopt Resolution #_______, ordering that the fees incurred for securing the house and
removing garbage and debris from the property located at 1926 N. Callow Avenue be collected as
reasonable abatement costs and become a lien against the property.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/25/13
1
1926 Callow Avenue Abatement Lien
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington approving charges for the abatement of
nuisance conditions on the property located at 1926 N. Callow
Avenue and determining means of collection.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton incurred costs for securing the house and
removing garbage and debris from the property located at 1926 N. Callow Avenue; and
WHEREAS, Section 1.04.120 of the Bremerton Municipal Code allows the City
to recoup these costs either by personal judgment against the property owner or as a lien against
the property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is charged with determining whether the fees are
just and how they should be collected; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development recommends the fees be
collected as a lien against the property located at 1926 N. Callow Avenue; and
WHEREAS, has City Council has considered the report of charges filed by the
Director of Community Development and any protests or objection filed, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The abatement charges included in the report to the City Clerk for
the property located at 1926 N. Callow Avenue, Bremerton, WA, attached hereto as Exhibit A,
are just and reasonable and are hereby confirmed and approved.
SECTION 2. The City of Bremerton will exercise its right to recapture abatement
fees by filing a lien against the property. The Mayor is authorized to execute and file a lien
against the property located at 1926 N. Callow Avenue, Bremerton, WA, for the abatement
charges approved herein.
SECTION 3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
2
1926 Callow Avenue Abatement Lien
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, this
4th day of September, 2013.
_____________________________
GREG WHEELER, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST
________________________________ _______________________
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk
R:\Legal\Legal\Resolutions\Community Development\Bottorff Resolution 8-14-13.docx
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Public Hearing and Ordinance
amending BMC Title 20, the Zoning Code.
Study Session Date: August 28, 2013
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 4, 2013
Department: DCD
Presenter: Nicole Floyd
Phone: 360.473.5279
SUMMARY: The action before Council is to conduct a public hearing and adopt an Ordinance
amending BMC Title 20 as follows:
1. Increase SEPA exemption levels as permitted by State Code
2. Modify requirements relating to drive-through facilities within commercial districts
3. Alter front yard setback requirements for commercial properties.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Staff Memo and Planning Commission Meeting Minutes from the workshop held on April 16,
2013 & the hearing held on July 16, 2013.
B. Proposed Ordinance including Planning Commission Findings & Conclusions.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
STUDY SESSION AGENDA: ☐ No Presentation ☒ Full Presentation
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ☐ Consent Agenda ☐ General Business ☒ Public Hearing
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Ordinance No.______ to amend BMC Title 20 related to
SEPA exemptions, Drive-through requirements, and Commercial setbacks.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve Deny Table Continue No Action
Form Updated 01/25/13
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: Nicole Floyd, Senior Planner
Date: August 21, 2013
Subject: Zoning Code Amendments
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Planning Commission is unanimously recommending that the City Council review
and approve three separate zoning code amendment topics. These amendments are
intended to encourage growth and development within the City and have bee n
supported by local developers, community members, and City Staff. A brief summary of
each is as follows:
SEPA Exemptions: Recognizing that the Department of Ecology approved higher
thresholds earlier this year, the Planning Commission recommends raising these
thresholds to the highest levels allowed by state law. This increase will result in an
expedited permit review process, without reducing the quality of the environmental
review performed by City Staff. SEPA exemptions have not been raised in Bremerton
since the 1970’s however significant increases in alternative regulatory controls have
been enacted since the 1970’s. These updated City regulations have superseded the
need for SEPA on small scale projects.
Drive-Through Facilities: These revisions are a direct outcome from the City
Council’s annual retreat, when Council requested DCD review standards relating to
drive-through facilities and the inconsistency between the requirements from zone to
zone. The Planning Commission, agreed with City Council and are forwarding
amendments to the City Council that establish criteria for drive-through facilities that
addresses site design and aesthetic elements necessary to ensure consistency with the
comprehensive plan’s vision. Draft amendments establish general standards for all
drive-through facilities throughout the City and significantly reduce the num ber of zones
in which drive-throughs are prohibited.
Maximum Front Yard Setbacks: These revisions are also a direct outcome from the
City Council’s annual retreat when Council requested DCD to identify revisions to the
zoning code which could facilitate redevelopment, while retaining the comprehensive
plan “centers” concept. The Planning Commissions draft amendments provide a better
transition towards the centers concept by adding flexibility without compromising the
Comprehensive Plan’s overall goals and policies.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I – Minutes from the Planning Commission hearing held on 7/16/2013 and
the workshop held on 4/16/2013.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Page 2
SEPA Categorical Exemptions Thresholds
In 2012, the State Legislature passed amendments to the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) that directly affects local governments. In part three of the Second
Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill (2ESSB) 6406, the legislature enacted a number of
changes to SEPA that are designed to make this environmental law work better for
cities, counties and project applicants by coordinating it more efficiently with current
land use planning and development regulations, and by streamlining the regulatory
process. The amendments went into effect on July 10, 2012.
The Department of Ecology spent the remaining part of 2012 preparing SEPA rule
updates to implement the 2012 legislation. The rules have been updated and went into
effect on January 28, 2013. One of the amendments to SEPA is to allow local
governments fully planning under GMA to establish separate flexible SEPA exemption
thresholds. Maximum exemptions are identified in WAC 197-11-800, but local
governments have the flexibility to establish exemptions within that range. In order for
local governments to raise the levels of development activity that are exempt from
SEPA review to the maximum specified in the amended SEPA rules, an amendment to
the jurisdiction’s codified SEPA procedures must be made, and the process established
in WAC 197-11-800(c) must be followed.
The Planning Commission, during their workshops, reviewed the various exemption
ranges, and recommended that the highest exemption levels be adopted primarily due
to the City’s exemplary set of regulations specifically addressing potential adverse
environmental impacts such as the Critical Area Ordinance, Shoreline Master Program,
Stormwater Manuals, and adopted Best Management Practices.
Threshold Levels for SEPA Categorical Exemptions
WAC 197-11-800(1)(c)and(d)
Minor New
Construction
Levels allowed
outright by
WAC
1971-2012 Highest
Exemptions
Available
2013 Highest Exemptions
Available –
Recommended by
Planning Commission
Dwelling Units 4 dwelling units 20 dwelling units 30 dwelling units and
60 multi-family units
Parking Stalls 20 stalls 40 stalls 90 stalls
Commercial
Building
4,000 square
feet
12,000 square feet
+ 40 parking stalls
30,000 square foot + 90
parking stalls
Grading 100 cubic yards 400 cubic yards 1,000 cubic yards
Page 3
Auto Oriented Development and the Comprehensive Plan
The following two topics (drive-through facilities and setbacks) are both somewhat
unique in that they are intrinsically tied to goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Both were created to directly implement the “Centers” concept which is intended to
promote new development into mixed use centers, where one can comfortably walk
from their home to the grocery store, coffee shop, office etc. When considering revisions
to either of these code sections it is important to reflect upon the impact such revisions
may have on the successful implementation of the Comprehensive Plans goals.
Significant effort has been taken to ensure the proposed revisions do not inadvertently
diminish the long-term viability of the Centers Concept. Instead, Planning
Commission’s recommendation is to bridge the gap between the existing development
pattern and the goals for the future.
These two sections have been challenging to draft because of their interconnectedness
to implementation of the “Centers” concept. Since auto oriented businesses such as
drive-through facilities or large seas of parking in front of businesses are contrary to the
to the type of development that achieve a dense walkable center, their permitted
locations are currently severely limited by the Zoning Code. Transition from auto
oriented development patterns to the Centers concept has not been as successful as
was anticipated when the Zoning Code was adopted in 2005. The Planning
Commission finds that this transition would be more successful if the code provided
more flexibility to allow this transition to take place over time. The proposed revisions
reflect this effort towards flexibility, without alteration to the long term goals established
in the Comprehensive Plan. For both topics, the focus is on following elements:
1. Consistency: Revisions are intended to ensure that all commercial zoning
designations have similar requirements and use similar language so that code
provisions are applied appropriately. Zones designated as a “Center” such as District
Center, or Neighborhood Center are intended to be more intensely regulated for
compliance with the “Centers Concept” because they are the primary focus areas in
the Comprehensive Plan. Proposed revisions maintain this emphasis.
2. Flexibility: Revisions are intended to acknowledge that every site is different,
each with unique constraints. The proposed code language intends to establish clear
requirements, but to allow for minor code departure on a case by case basis provided
specific criteria is met. In this way, the code maintains consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan but achieves greater flexibility for unforeseen situations where
specific compliance is not feasible.
3. Existing Development: Current code provisions focus primarily on new
development, where the site is void of existing structures and new structures are built.
Very little consideration for remodel or expansion of existing developed sites is given.
These existing developments make up a substantial portion of the Commercial
property in Bremerton. Proposed revisions include provisions that accommodate
existing development.
Page 4
This drive-through lane is physically
separated from the parking area,
located behind and to the side of the
building, screened with a combination
of landscaping and a trellis, and
provides additional aesthetics with its
pavement treatment.
Drive-Through Facilities
Significant attention was paid to drive-through facilities at the April Planning
Commission Workshop. The Commission discussion focused primarily on the two
major highways running through the City, Kitsap Way and Wheaton Way. There are
several different commercial zones scattered along these highways, all of which have
their own specific regulations. Some zones outrightly permit drive-through facilities
without any specific requirements for their placement or design, while other zones
prohibit such uses altogether. Additionally, the existing development pattern along
these two highways is primarily auto oriented and includes a considerable number of
existing drive-through facilities throughout all of the zones. With so many existing drive -
through facilities, it has been challenging for applicants to understand why a new drive -
through is prohibited, when neighboring businesses have them.
Based on these issues, the Commission’s proposed revisions allow drive-through
facilities in more locations without negatively impacting the overall growth strategy of the
Comprehensive Plan. The following summarizes the changes proposed.
Enhanced code language is shown in the existing “Drive-Through Lane” section. The
new language establishes criteria for all drive-throughs. This additional language
resolves the issue of consistency as it ensures that all drive-through facilities will be
held to the same standard regardless of the zone in which they are located. The new
drive-through standards include the following:
Clarification of Use: The proposed amendments include modifications to the definition
section to clearly identify what components make up a drive-through facility (window
and stacking lane) and to clarify that a drive-through
facility is not a separate use, rather it can be an
accessory function to any permitted use in the
applicable zone.
Preferred Locations: Amendments encourage the
drive-through facility to be located to the side or rear
of the building when possible. When this is not
possible, screening requirements have been added to
reduce the visual impacts of the drive-through.
Stacking Lane: Current code language does not
explicitly identify the minimum number of waiting cars
the lane must hold. This is typically important for small
lots, to ensure waiting cars are not blocking traffic on
the street. The stacking lane requirement has been
set at a minimum of 4 cars, and 6 cars for
restaurant/food/drink uses.
Page 5
This pedestrian walkway
provides a safe connection
from a parking area to a
building.
Design: The Comprehensive Plan establishes that the most important design elements
for drive-through facilities include screening of the drive-through lane and ensuring safe
pedestrian movement on and within the site. The amendments establish design c riteria
that include: landscaping, screening, modified materials for the stacking lane, and
enhanced pedestrian features.
Signage: New requirements have been created to ensure proper size, placement and
screening of menu boards to minimize impact on adjacent
properties.
Pedestrian Features: Acknowledging the Comprehensive
Plan’s policies for pedestrian friendly centers a new
provision requiring walkways distinguished with pavement
treatment, is included and intended to provide safe
connections onto the site from public sidewalks, as well as
within the site from parking areas.
These new standards enable a reduction in the number of
zones that currently prohibit drive-throughs because these
requirements will facilitate better design and enhanced
pedestrian safety. The only zones that continue the prohibition on drive -through
facilities are the District Center Core, Neighborhood Center Core, and Neighborhood
Business. The following chart identifies the proposed relaxation of the prohibition.
The District and Neighborhood Center Core zones are extremely important in terms of
achieving the “Centers Concept” outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. These areas
include places such as Downtown, Manette, and Charleston where drive -through
facilities seem out of character with the existing development pattern as well as the
planned growth strategy. Two areas within these center zones are proposed to allow
drive-through facilities because the properties within them are located on Kitsap Way or
Wheaton Way where existing development is dominated by auto oriented uses.
Similarly, due to the small scale nature of the Neighborhood Business zone, drive -
through facilities seem inappropriate.
Allowed with Permitted Use Prohibited
Commercial Corridor District Center Core
~Exception: Wheaton/Riddell Sub-Area
Wheaton Way Redevelopment Corridor Neighborhood Center Core
~ Exception: Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center Freeway Corridor
Industrial
Neighborhood Business Industrial Park
Employment Center
Institutional
Page 6
Maximum Front Yard Setbacks and Parking
The Planning Commission deliberated extensively on the topic of maximum front yard
setbacks and recommends the amendments because they will provide for enhanced
flexibility without diminishing the long term goals of the Comprehensive Plan related to
the “Centers” concept. One of the primary purposes of the maximum front yard setback
is to place the building, rather than parking on the street frontage, much like one would
see in a dense urban core such as Downtown. Particular attention is paid to street
corners, as they anchor the entire street scape and affect more than one street
frontage. Due to the extensive discussions in the code about parking lot locations,
careful attention must be paid to ensure increased setbacks are coupled with adequate
parking standards to ensure compliance with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of the
street presence.
Complaints about the maximum front yard setback have been primarily due to a lack of
flexibility for unforeseen circumstances such as topography, or the added complexities
from trying to design a new structure around existing onsite development. Additionally,
Staff has struggled with the code language due to the lack of consistency between
different zones, where some set the maximum at 5’ and others at 10’ with very few
provisions to allow for an increase. The proposed revisions intend to resolve these
issues without substantial impact to the Comprehensive Plan goals as follows:
Improved Setback Flexibility: New language is provided that recognizes several
scenarios in which increased setbacks may be appropriate and allows any applicant to
request an increase. The list is not exhaustive; rather it is intended to provide guidance
regarding what situations the increase may apply to, such as: topography, utilities, site
constraints, to accommodate phased infill, for projects with existing occupied structures,
etc. Prior to approval of the setback departure, the applicant must demonstrate why an
increased setback is needed, how it is the minimum necessary, what compensating
features will be provided in order to facilitate a superior site design, and how it maintains
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. It is anticipated that these criteria will
provide enough flexibility to allow for modifications when strict code compliance is not
possible, but will be challenging enough that applicants will make a concerted effort to
comply with the code prior requesting a departure.
Setback Consistency: Revisions establish consistency through all zoning districts by
establishing the same 10’ maximum front yard setback in as many zones as possible,
rather than having a 5’ setback in some and 10’ in others.
Parking:
Each zone with maximum front yard setback requirements also include s a specific
parking section which establishes regulations in excess of the standard parking chapter.
These parking requirements are intended to fulfill the Comprehensive Plans vision to
hide parking lots behind the building, rather than placing them in f ront of buildings.
Page 7
Site Frontage – 50% max
parking
Happy Street
building
Each zone has slightly different language relating to parking, but most contain similar
concepts such as:
Minimize the amount of parking in front of the
building.
Prohibit parking on street corners
Access parking off of smaller ancillary roads when
possible.
Proposed revisions focus on increasing flexibility as with
the maximum setback discussion above. Revisions are as
follows:
Parking at the Building Frontage: Each zone establishes a slightly different
maximum percentage for the amount of parking that may be between the building and
the street frontage. The proposed amendments establish the same percentage (50%)
for all of the zones. Additionally, the proposed amendments include clarifying language
that helps identify what portions of the lot this
requirement applies to.
Parking at the Corner: Rather than prohibiting parking
at the corner of two street intersections, the proposed
amendments provide for some flexibility by establishing
design criteria to screen the parking should it be located
at an intersection. Such screening is intended to fully
hide the parking areas. The wall or hedge is intended to
achieve the anchoring effect desired by the
Comprehensive Plan.
Consistency: Although not discussed in detail, there are several revisions included
throughout the attached proposed amendment document that are not intended to have
substantive impact, but are to clarify the existing intent. For example, the word
“principal” has been added in front of “arterial” because there are several different types
of arterial roads within Bremerton. Another example is the removal of handicapped
parking stall requirements as these requirements are more clearly addressed in the
Building Code.
In summary, the Planning Commission unanimously recommends these zoning code
amendments because they will likely encourage development within the City, will
provide more flexibility for applicants, and will maintain consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Attachment I
Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes for:
Workshop held on
April 16, 2013
&
Public Hearing held on
July 16, 2013
DRAFT
Subject to September 17, 2013 Approval
CITY OF BREMERTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
July 16, 2013
CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Jose called the regular meeting of the Bremerton Planning Commission to order at 5:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present
Staff Present
Chair Jose
Vice Chair Tift
Commissioner Albright
Commissioner Dinkuhn
Commissioner Lambert
Commissioner Strube
Commissioners Absent
Commissioner Simpson (excused)
Quorum Certified
Andrea Spencer, Director, Department of Community Development
Nicole Floyd, Current Planner, Department of Community Development
Allison Daniels, Current Planner, Department of Community Development
Others Present
Lisa Grueter, Berk Consulting
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COMMISSIONER LAMBERT MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED. VICE CHAIR TIFT
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
COMMISSIONER STRUBE MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 18, 2013 AS AMENDED.
COMMISSIONER ALBRIGHT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC MEETING
Call to the Public (public comments on any item not on the agenda)
Chair Jose asked if there were any comments from citizens. Seeing none, he closed the public portion of the meeting.
Public Hearing: Zoning Code Amendments Relating to Drive -Throughs, Commercial Building Setbacks, and State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Exemptions
Ms. Floyd recalled that the Commission previously discussed all three topics in both January and May. She said her staff
report would cover the broad concepts, but she could cover the topics in more detail at the request of the Commission.
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 2 of 11
Staff Report on SEPA Exemptions
Ms. Floyd said it is important to remember that the State has allowed increases to the SEPA exemptions over the years , and
most recently in 2012. She provided a chart to illustrate how the State SEPA exemption levels changed in both 1971 and
2012. She noted that the City of Bremerton chose not to adopt the maximum exemptions allowed by the State in 1971, and
they recently held a workshop discussion about the pros and cons of changing the City’s exemption levels to the fullest exten t
allowed by the 2012 changes. During the earlier workshops the Commission recommended that staff bring to public hearing
the option to raise the exemption levels to the highest levels primarily because the City now has an exemplary set of
regulations that specifically address potential adverse environmental impacts such as the Critical Areas Ordinance, Shoreline
Master Program, Stormwater Manual and adopted Best Management Practices. She noted that these regulations were not
available in 1971. She explained that utilizing the higher exemptions would expedite permit review. Projects that fall below
the exemption limits would not be required to go through the three -month SEPA process. Staff is of the opinion that other
City regulations would address any environmental impacts.
Staff Report on Zoning Code Amendments Relating to Drive-Through Facilities
Ms. Floyd said it is anticipated that the City of Bremerton will be the largest metropolitan area in Kitsap County in the
future. The Comprehensive Plan focuses on how the City can reach this goal through the “Centers” concept, which is
intended to promote new development into mixed-use centers. She provided pictures to illustrate what the City is supposed
to look like in the future. The goal is to encourage mixed -use development with commercial on the ground floor and
residential units above. Street corners would become key anchors, and there would be places for citizens to walk, shop and
interact. Because pedestrians, not cars, would be the major focal point, pedestrians should be in front of buildings and cars in
back.
Ms. Floyd noted that the Commission’s discussion about the “centers” concept was most recently focused on Kitsap Way
and Wheaton Way. It was discussed that the existing development patterns focus on vehicular rather than pedestrian traffic.
While it is the City’s intent that the areas transform over time, very little transition has occurred during the last eight years
except for more vacant buildings. She commented that consumer demand is important. Developers build what consumers
want, and they contend that consumers want to be able to drive to a building and park in front.
Ms. Floyd said that, although staff is not recommending changes to the vision outlined in the Comprehensive Plan at this
point, staff believes the “centers” concept outlined in the Comprehensive Plan would be more su ccessfully implemented if
the code provided more flexibility to allow transition to take place over time. The proposed revisions are intended to provi de
this flexibility, without altering the long-term goals established in the Comprehensive Plan. She explained that transitioning
from existing development to the vision outlined in the Comprehensive Plan will take a giant leap, and will require that
properties be completely redeveloped with no existing non-conforming buildings remaining. Staff does not believe this
approach is realistic at this time, given the current economy. The proposed revisions acknowledge that each site is different
and has unique constraints. The revised language would establish clear requirements but allow for minor code departure on a
case-by-case basis provided that specific criteria are met.
Ms. Floyd advised that consistency is important. The revisions are intended to ensure that all commercial zones have similar
requirements and use similar language so that code provisions can be applied appropriately. She noted that the current code
provisions focus primarily on new development, and very little consideration is given for remodel or expansion of existing
developed (non-conforming) sites. However, because existing development makes up a substantial portion of the
commercial property in Bremerton, the proposed revisions include provisions that accommodate existing development. As
an example, she provided a picture of an auto-oriented development. She explained that it is unreasonable to think that the
property will be completely redeveloped to a different use within the next 20 years, but any remodel or addition to the
property can be done in a way that is more consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan.
Ms. Floyd recalled that the Commission’s last discussion about drive-through facilities focused primarily on properties along
the two major highways running through the City (Wheaton Way and Kitsap Way). Since that time, staff considered the use
in other commercial zones in the City, as well. She explained that drive -through facilities are prohibited entirely in some
commercial zones but are allowed in others without any design criteria. She said that instead of focusing just on Wheaton
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 3 of 11
Way and Kitsap Way, staff is now recommending that the City establish standards for all drive -through facilities regardless
of the zone they are located in. She reviewed a chart provided in the Staff Report to illustrate where drive -through facilities
would be permitted or prohibited. She noted that, as currently proposed, drive-through uses would be prohibited in the
District Center Core, Neighborhood Center Core and Neighborhood Business Zones. She emphasized that the Di strict and
Neighborhood Center Core Zones are extremely important in terms of achieving the “Centers” concept, and drive -through
facilities in these zones would seem out of character with both the existing development pattern and the planned growth
strategy. The exceptions would be the Wheaton/Riddell Subarea and the Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center. There are
already several drive-through facilities in the Wheaton/Riddell Subarea, and the subarea plan provides regulations that are
specific to the area. Allowing drive-through facilities, with specific criteria, seems appropriate in this one location. She also
said that, due to the small-scale nature of the Neighborhood Business zone, drive-through facilities would be out of character.
Ms. Floyd reviewed the proposed drive-through facility standards as follows:
Clarification of Use. Drive-through facilities should be considered an accessory to any permitted use. The way the
code is currently written calls them out as a separate use, but they are usually attached to a busines s or use. Definitions
were added to make it clear that if you have an allowed use, a drive -through facility would be permitted as long as the
criteria can be met.
Preferred Locations. At their last workshop, the Commission discussed where drive-through facilities would be
appropriate. The proposed amendments encourage the drive-through facilities to be located to the side or rear of the
building when possible. When this is not possible, screening requirements were added to reduce the visual impacts of
the drive-through facility.
Stacking Lane. To address safety issues, at least four cars must be able to park behind the window to ensure waiting
cars are not blocking traffic on the street. The current code language does not specifically identify a minimum number
of waiting cars the lane must hold. The proposed amendment sets the stacking lane requirement at a minimum of four
cars, and six cars for restaurant/food/drink uses. Chair Jose asked if the four-car requirement includes the car that is at
the window. Ms. Floyd said the requirement applies to the space behind the window, and would not include the space
for the car being served. She explained that the standard is flexible in terms of how long each of the spaces must be.
Design. The Comprehensive Plan establishes that the most important design elements for drive-through facilities
include screening of the drive-through lanes and ensuring safe pedestrian movement on and within the site.
Pedestrian Features. Drive-through facilities, in general, are contrary to the Comprehensive Plan’s goal of making
pedestrians the primary users and vehicles the secondary users. This can be done by creating space that makes it clear
the pedestrian has the right-of-way via designated walkways from parking areas, using a different material for dri ve-
through lanes so they are easily identifiable to pedestrians, and enhancing landscaping to provide a buffer between the
parking area and the drive-through lane.
Signage. The current code does not have adequate signage requirements for drive -through lanes. The proposed
amendment includes new requirements to ensure proper size, placement and screening.
Ms. Floyd provided pictures of drive-through facilities currently located at two Starbuck locations to illustrate the concepts
outlined in the proposed new design standards. She also provided pictures to illustrate the difference between a drive -
through facility that is consistent with the proposed standards and one that is not. She summarized that the proposed
standards are intended to facilitate better design and enhanced pedestrian safety.
Staff Report on Zoning Code Amendments Relating Commercial Building Setbacks
Ms. Floyd reminded the Commission that the purpose of the maximum front-yard setback is to place the building, rather than
the parking, on the street front. The intent is to create the sense of an urban environment by pushing the building forward and
providing parking behind. This concept encourages pedestrians, rather than vehicles, along the frontage. She provided
pictures to illustrate the difference between development that is pushed up to the street front and development that is located
further back on the lot to provide parking in front.
Ms. Floyd advised that the proposed amendments are intended to provide more flexibility t o address unforeseen
circumstances such as topography and existing, on-site development without substantially impacting the Comprehensive Plan
goals. She reviewed the revisions staff is recommending to provide additional flexibility as follows:
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 4 of 11
Setback Consistency. Currently, the maximum setback is different, depending on the zone. The proposed amendment
would establish a consistent 10-foot maximum setback requirement for all commercial zones. In addition, the language
related to setbacks in each of the zones would be made as consistent as possible.
Improved Setback Flexibility. The proposed amendment would allow for an exception to the maximum 10 -foot front-
yard setback. This recognizes that there may be scenarios where a greater setback would be ap propriate. However, in
order to obtain approval of a setback departure, an applicant must demonstrate why an increased setback is necessary and
how it is the minimum necessary. The Director would make the final decision. Possible reasons for a setback d eparture
include topography, utilities, site constrains, and existing development.
Parking at the Building Frontage and on Corner Lots. The current code states that parking in front of a commercial
development should be minimized and parking on corners is prohibited. Each zone establishes a slightly different
maximum percentage for the amount of parking that may be located between the b uilding and the street front. Staff is
recommending a consistent percentage of 50% for all zones. Rather than prohibiting parking intersections, the proposed
amendments provide flexibility by establishing design criteria to screen the parking should it b e located at an
intersection. She provided a diagram to illustrate what is meant by “building fro ntage” (area between the sidewalk and
the building along the entire frontage) and explained how the proposed amendments would be applied. She also
provided examples to illustrate how the parking requirements could be achieved.
Ms. Floyd explained how the proposed amendments would be applied to the property that is currently developed as Arnold’s
Furniture Store. She recalled that there was a fire several years ago and half the site is now sitting vacant. As per the current
zoning code, any development that occurs on the site must be pushed into the corner towards the two street fronts. The
proposed amendments offer optional building locations, provided that the property owner submits analysis to demonstrate
why the setback departure is necessary and how he/she would compensate for pushing the building back.
Commissioner Dinkuhn asked if the 50% parking limitation would apply to both streets when a building is located at the
corner and fronts two streets. Ms. Floyd answered that it would apply to both streets.
Commissioner Lambert requested clarification of the term “primary frontage” and “secondary frontage.” Ms. Floyd
answered that “primary frontage” typically refers to the portion of the building that fronts the busier street. She explaine d
that the current code does not differentiate between the different types of streets. The proposed amendments would identify
both “primary arterial” and “secondary arterial” streets, consistent with the Engineering Department’s classification map of
streets.
Ms. Floyd concluded her staff report and recommended the Commission conduct an open record hearing, consider
testimony, and make a recommendation of the proposed amendments to the City Council.
Public Comments
Chair Jose opened the public hearing for comments related to the proposed amendments outlined by staff.
Larry Matel, Port Orchard, said he was very impressed by the forward-thinking staff presentations with respect to urban
design and transportation. He expressed his belief that the City of Bremerton has taken a strong leadership in the
consideration of form, function and design of t he City; not only with respect to land-use planning and development, but also
with respect to stormwater. He commented that the proposed amendments are in line with what he has seen happen in a
number of other progressively-oriented communities throughout the western states and United States, in general. He said the
proposed revisions will set a tone for the future of what Bremerton will be as time goes on. He asked the Commission to
recommend approval of the modifications as presented. While there may be some push back from some citizens who support
the status quo, the City must look towards a new generation of citizenry, as well.
Ralph Ericson, Bremerton, said he owns the Arnold’s Furniture property located at Kitsap Way and Marine Drive, which
was shown in one of the illustrations provided during the Staff Report. He said he has been trying to develop the property for
a number of years, but has been held back by the poor economy and because the City codes are too restrictive. The land has
remained vacant and does not produce income for either the owners or the City. He noted that extensive planning has gone
into the proposed amendments, and they represent an approach that he can work with to develop the property. He
encouraged the Commission to recommend approval of the proposed revisions as presented by staff. While he recognized
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 5 of 11
the ultimate goal of the Comprehensive Plan vision, the current requirements are tough on developers. The amendments are
just one way to encourage development that will help to revitalize the community.
Chair Jose closed the public hearing.
Commission Deliberation and Action
Commissioner Strube said he appreciates staff’s hard work on the proposed amendments. He likes to see that the City is
willing to compromise to make the situation better for businesses in the community. He said supports the amendments, as
proposed.
Commissioner Lambert agreed and said she particularly appreciates staff’s attention to making the code requirements more
flexible. While they must work with the Comprehensive Plan that is currently in place, staff has put a lot of thought into
making it flexible to accommodate whatever business might come in. She said she supports the proposed change, as
proposed.
Chair Jose shared correspondence from Commissioner Simpson, who was unable to attend the hearing. She recommends
adoption of the proposed amendments, as well.
COMMISSIONER DINKUHN MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT THE TEXT AMENDMENTS TO BREMERTON MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 20 AS DETAILED IN
ATTACHMENT I BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS PRESENTED IN ATTACHMENT II.
COMMISSIONER STRUBE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Public Workshop: Provide Feedback for the Selection of a Preferred Alternative of the Gorst Subarea Plan and
Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Ms. Daniels introduced Lisa Grueter from Berk Consulting, who was present to help answer ques tions from the Commission.
She announced that the draft Gorst Subarea Plan, draft Gorst Creek Watershed Characterization Framework Plan and the
associated EIS was released on July 10th and public comments will be accepted until July 24 th. She noted that all comments
would be considered when the City moves forward with a preferred alternative.
Ms. Daniels advised that the purpose of the workshop is for the Commission to help identify a preferred land -use alternative
to proceed in the planning effort for the Gorst Urban Growth Area (UGA) Subarea Plan. She reminded the Commission that
the City of Bremerton is working jointly with Kitsap County to outline three potential futures for the Gorst Watershed and
UGA. She noted that the Gorst UGA is currently located in Kitsap County’s jurisdiction, but there is potential for future
annexation into the City of Bremerton. Working together to create the subarea plan would allow for a smooth transition if
and when annexation occurs.
Ms. Daniels announced that a public workshop on the draft Gorst Subarea Plan on was held on June 20th. Staff has also
conducted workshops with both the Kitsap County Planning Commission and the Bremerton Planning Commission. In
addition, staff has met on several occasions with the Advisory Committee and other project partners. All of the entities will
come together to help determine the preferred alternative. The Planning Commission's recommendation and guidance will be
very valuable in creating the subarea plan for the Gorst UGA.
Ms. Daniels reviewed the project objectives as follows:
To make Gorst a place where people shop, live and recreate.
To protect the water quality, environmental aspects and habitat while fostering economic development. She noted that
Gorst is an endangered species habitat area, and salmon and steelhead run through Gorst Creek.
Identify areas for development and restoration protection based on science.
Adopt a land-use plan for Gorst.
Implement a long-range capital improvement plan.
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 6 of 11
Ms. Daniels said the main focus of her presentation is to review the three alternatives the Commission discussed at their last
workshop in more detail. She encouraged the Commission to provide feedback regarding the pros and cons of each
alternative. She said she anticipates a public hearing on the preferred alternative before the Planning Commission in October.
She reminded the Commission that the EIS required the City to evaluate three alternatives. She reviewed the alternatives and
the public comments that were received for each one.
Alternative 1 – A Small Highway-Oriented Commercial and Industrial Center. Ms. Daniels said this alternative is
based on what the City’s current code would allow. The mine area is identified in the Kitsap County Comp rehensive
Plan as “Mineral Resources,” which would be equivalent to the City’s “Industrial” zone. The City is proposing that the
properties identified as “Industrial” in the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan would be changed to “Open Space” in
Alternatives 2 and 3, but they would remain as “Industrial” in Alternative 1. The majority of the area is identified as
high-intensity “Commercial Mixed Use.” The County allows for residential along the freeway corridor, and the City of
Bremerton does not. She also noted where the “Low-Density Residential” properties would be located.
Ms. Daniels advised that the majority of those in attendance at the public workshop were not in complete support of
Alternative 1. Some individuals liked the existing Low-Density Residential, likely because that is where their homes are
located. They did not like the high-intensity Commercial Mixed Use Zone, and they preferred that the Industrial zones
be changed to Open Space. Overall, the alternative was not supported.
Alternative 2 – A Well-Designed Regional Commercial Center. Ms. Daniels explained that the mine area is going to
be reclaimed at some point in the future. Regardless of the preferred alternative, the property will remain designated as
Mineral Resources until the mining activity is completed. The mining company is required to complete a reclamation
plan when the mining use is discontinued. Alternative 2 is centered around a commercial center, with residential uses on
the outskirts. As per Alternative 2, the mining area would be designated as Medium-Density Residential. Low-Density
Residential would be located to the west, and the areas surrounding the highways would be identified as Commercial
Corridor. The Commercial Corridor Zone would allow most commercial uses, excluding industrial uses. The majority
of the areas that are currently identified as Industrial would be changed to Open Space.
Ms. Daniels reported that two negative comments were received at the workshop about the proposed Medium-Density
Residential Zone. There was support for the commercial area to the north, and there was substantial support for
designating properties as Open Space. They expressed a desire to maintain the waterfront zone, with very little support
for commercial uses in the area. They heard from a number of people that they would like lower -intensity development
on the properties located along the creek to protect the stream. Ms. Daniels noted that the impacts of Alternative 2
would be greater than the impacts associated with Alternative 1 because it calls for redevelopment of the mine property
as Medium-Density Residential. However, the subarea plan will provide smart planning principles and guidance in an
effort to reduce the potential impacts.
Commissioner Lambert asked about the point of leaving the mining property zoned as Mineral Resources, if the use
will discontinue within 10 years. Ms. Daniels explained that if Alternative 1 goes forward for the next 20 years, the
mining company would be required to obtain a rezone in order to complete their reclamation plan. Alternatives 2 and 3
would make the mining operation non-conforming with the subarea plan, but the use would be allowed to continue.
Future reclamation of the site would require compliance with the current code.
Alternative 3 – A Complete Community. Ms. Daniels said this alternative moves away from the commercial corridor
concept. The mining area would be designated as Neighborhood Mixed Use, which would allow for medium-density
residential and small neighborhood businesses. The area designated as Gorst Creek Residential would allow for clusters
of residential development such as “cottage homes” in order to protect the creek. To obtain the higher density, a
different type of development may be necessary. The Gorst Mixed Use area would allow both residential and
commercial uses. She noted that the area along the waterfront was identified as Low-Intensity Waterfront, which would
allow commercial development but with more stringent environmental requirements. The open spaces would be the
same as those proposed for Alternative 2.
Ms. Daniels said most of the participants at the public workshop agreed that the City should start with Alternative 3 as
the preferred alternative, but also include some elements from Alternatives 1 and 2. The citizens indicated support for
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 7 of 11
the waterfront remaining accessible to the community. She said regardless of the preferred alternative, Kitsap County is
planning a boardwalk in the waterfront area someday. Citizens want more protection for the creek and expressed a
desire for more residential zoning along the creek. There was a mixed reaction to the proposed Neighborhood Mixed
Use Zone, with some expressing their desire that it remain as residential development.
Chair Jose issued a call to the public to comment on the agenda item.
Jack Standfill, Chico Creek Task Force, commented that there should be a reclamation permit in place with the
Department of Natural Resources for the mine site. He asked how much of the property would be reclaimed and restored,
and what the process will be. He suggested that perhaps some trails through the property could be included.
Larry Matel, Port Orchard, said he attended the Kitsap Planning Commission’s recent meeting, but there was no
opportunity for public input. Once again, he applauded the efforts of the City staff and consultants in taking a long-term look
at the Gorst area and the future of this part of Kitsap County and Bremerton proper. He said that, in preparation for the
meeting, he reviewed the documentation provided on line, which is voluminous and daunting. He suggested the City provide
an executive summary for public dissemination to help the citizens understand the important issues. From the standpoint of
land-use planning and being a planner, himself, the concept of trying to look forward to the highest and best use i s a
traditional approach to land-use planning, and he finds no fault with the process that has taken place thus far. He said he
supports Alternative 3, which would provide a reasonable mix of trying to accommodate existing uses while looking to the
future.
Mr. Matel said that, as a transportation planner, he analyzed the impacts of large redevelopment projects in other parts of the
country. Making transportation fit and serving the land uses will be a significant factor to consider. He noted that they
anticipate 77,000 to 80,000 cars per day through the corridor, and realizing redevelopment of the commercial properties will
be challenging. They must consider the potential conflicts for getting vehicles into and out of the sites even without the
future growth in this part of Kitsap County. He said he read with interest a while back that the Washington State Department
of Transportation (WSDOT) is considering some type of transportation planning effort for the area. This will have to happen
in order for the Gorst Subarea to be an enticing place for developers to make significant investments in the future. He
clarified that his comments are not meant to suggest the City should not identify a preferred alternative . However, as they
move forward with their subarea planning efforts, transportation will be a key factor in making the area viable in the future.
Mr. Matel said that at a previous Commission meeting he mentioned the concept of non-motorized connections from the
Gorst Subarea to the rest of Kitsap County, including the Cities of Bremerton and Port Orchard, the South Kitsap Industrial
Area, etc. As the east side of Puget Sound becomes more congested, people will look to move to Kitsap County. They have
the opportunity to plan now for the complete needs of the community from the standpoint of transportation. While the
automobile has been, and most likely will remain, a major method of transporting people in the future, the concept of
seriously looking at alternative transportation (pedestrian and bicycle) will be key to helping mitigate some of the impacts.
He said he read information that indicated they are anticipating an additional 500 to 600 new homes in the Gorst Subarea,
which equates, under current transportation planning estimates, to another 5,000 to 6,000 cars per day through the corridor.
The highway facility in this area is already maxed out during peak hours, and long term plans needs to be in place He
recommended there be some dialogue established betwee n the City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, the United States
Government (Navy), and WSDOT that looks at a forward-thinking, sustainable transportation system in the area.
Mr. Matel commented that the Sinclair Trail should also be an important element of the Gorst Subarea Plan. He said he has
worked with trail advocates in the area to try and revive the momentum of the Sinclair Trail charette that was held a few
years ago. He has also read with interest the things that are happening with the United States Navy and their inability to
forward the waterside aspect of the trail. However, he does not think all is lost. The state highway is still available; and with
some creative engineering with WSDOT and its new leadership, there are opportunities that are compatible with the Navy,
WSDOT, Kitsap County and the Cities of Bremerton and Port Orchard. Providing an opportunity for visitors to make a tour
from Bremerton to Port Orchard and then take the ferry home would add a lot of economic vibrancy to the City without
bringing in a lot of extra growth.
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 8 of 11
Mr. Standfill thanked the staff for doing a great job of answering the citizens concerns and questions. He also thanked the
Commission for allowing public input at their workshop meetings. He said the Chico Creek Task Force has people r eady to
build a north/south trail over to Jarstad Park, and it will be called the Pleasant Valley Trail.
Mr. Matel said it is also important for pedestrians to have the ability to get fr om the Charleston area to the Gorst Subarea.
Currently, this is both impossible and illegal. In a recent conversation with a State Patrolman, he learned that only bicycl es
and motorized vehicles are permitted. He expressed his belief that WSDOT has a re sponsibility to the non-motorized
segment of the community to make the area safe and passable for pedestrians.
Commissioner Strube said he prefers Alternative 3, but he is having a hard time with the concept of adding more people
into the Gorst Subarea without having a bypass for the highway. He agreed that the City should work with WSDOT to find a
solution. He reminded the Commission that when the area floods, the community is crippled. He said he would like the
waterfront area to be improved, but he questioned how the proposed Low-Intensity Waterfront Zone would impact the
existing development. He noted that the Subaru dealership is a successful business in this location. Ms. Daniels answered
that neither the proposed Low-Intensity Waterfront Zone nor the proposed Shoreline Master Program would allow for new
developments of these kinds to be established . The Subaru dealership would become a legal non-conforming use. Ms.
Grueter commented that the intent of the zone is not to prohibit commercial uses, but to allow them in a different format.
However, no decision has been made as to the types of uses that would and would not be allowed. She noted that a car sales
business requires a lot of impervious surface, and the City is interested in reducing impervious surface in this area. The new
designation could impact the dealership’s ability to redevelop the site. Ms. Daniels said the intent of the Low-Density
Waterfront Zone is for development to go up versus out to reduce the amount of impervious sur face. It may be possible for a
property owner to negotiate with the City to obtain approval to expand existing development upward in exchange for
reducing the amount of impervious surface.
Commissioner Strube pointed out that many businesses in the waterfront area have struggled, but the Subaru dealership has
thrived. As much as he would like to see the waterfront area redevelop into less intense uses, he does not want to drive out
the sales tax revenues generated by this successful business. Ms. Daniels noted that the dealership site is essentially built
out, and the property owner would be allowed to maintain and repair the site for as long as the use continues. Chair Jose
commented that if the Subaru dealership were to do a substantial redevelopment , a number of other codes would apply to
severely constrain what they could do. The Low-Intensity Waterfront Zone would not add too many additional requirements
over and above those that already exist. Ms. Daniels concurred.
Commissioner Albright asked if other uses currently located in the waterfront area would be allowed to continue if
Alternative 3 is the preferred alternative. Ms. Daniels said the uses would be allowed to continue, but the non-conforming
regulations would apply. She said another issue for the Commission to consider is whether or not there should be a specific
non-conforming section of the code that is unique to the waterfront area.
Chair Jose summarized that the participants at the public workshop indicated a preference for Alternative 3, and this
preference was voiced by other citizens, as well. He asked the Commission to provide input on whether they should start
their discussions with Alternative 2 or Alternative 3.
Commissioner Lambert said she likes Alternative 3, particularly the Low-Intensity Waterfront and Gorst Creek Residential
Zones. She said she would not have a problem with the former mining site being either Medium-Density Residential
(Alternative 2) or Neighborhood Mixed Use (Alternative 3). Ms. Spencer noted that there was not a lot of public support for
the Medium-Density Residential Zone (Alternative 2), but there was significant support for the Neighborhood Mixed Use
Zone (Alternative 3) which would provide opportunities for small retail close to home. Ms. Grueter said that, while there
was general support for the Gorst Mixed Use Zone, there was some discussion that the access and viability of this area to
have amenities that residents would want is more limited in the triangular area that is between the two highways.
Commissioner Albright asked how many people participated in the community workshop. Ms. Daniels answered that there
were between 20 and 25 people in attendance, but only 18 signed in. Approximately 12 stayed for the small group
discussions at the end.
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 9 of 11
Chair Jose shared correspondence from Commissioner Simpson regarding her preferences for the preferred alternatives.
She recommends Alternative 2, but with the change that the mine area be designated as Neighborhood Mixed Use rather th an
Medium-Density Residential.
Commissioner Strube suggested that the area in vicinity to the mine property could be identified as Commercial instead of
Gorst Mixed Use. Ms. Grueter said the property is accessed from Sherman Heights Road, and most of the properties are
considered vacant by the County Assessor. Ms. Daniels noted that the property is owned by Lockhart, and it is proposed to
be developed as a business center. Ms. Grueter noted that this area did not receive much attention at the public wor kshop.
Ms. Spencer added that the property owner has submitted an application to Kitsap County to develop the site as a business
center.
Chair Jose referred to the properties that are designated as Gorst Creek Residential in Alternative 3 and Low-Density
Residential in Alternative 2. He asked the Commission to share their thoughts and preferences regarding these to
designations. Commissioner Lambert said she likes the Gorst Creek Residential Zone, as it allows units to be clustered to
lessen the environmental impacts associated with redevelopment. She pointed out that the Gorst Creek Residential Zone
would likely result in less development and better protection for the waterways that run through the are a.
Commissioner Dinkuhn noted that the Gorst Creek Residential Zone would provide an opportunity for the City and the
County to focus more on restoration of the entire area. She expressed her opinion that Alternative 1 is not viable. No one
believes the current situation should remain. Therefore, they only have two alternatives to talk about. She wished a third
alternative would have included reclamation of the entire area. She asked if the City and/or County would possibly entertain
ideas of offering incentives for the existing businesses to encourage them over time to move out of the areas designated in
Alternative 3 as Low-Intensity Waterfront, Open Space/Recreational and Gorst Mixed Use. These uses could then be
replaced with lower -intensity uses that would better protect the watershed and waterfront. Ms. Daniels said the Low-
Intensity Waterfront Zone would include additional requirements to protect the environment. If an existing use wants to
expand beyond what the requirements will allow, the owner would likely look for a new location. In addition, transportation
issues may encourage existing uses to relocate. Ms. Spencer suggested that rather than writing these types of incentives into
a plan, the City and County have an action plan to move the desired concepts forward. For example, the County has
demonstrated action with recent land acquisition and shoreline reclamation.
Commissioner Albright suggested that the bottom-line problem is transportation and traffic. Regardless of the types of uses
allowed, it is important for people to be able to get around the area. If the car dealership is made nonconforming, the use on
the site would change if the property is sold. However, the new owner would have the same problems with traffic and
access. Ms. Spencer said the subarea plan would identify improvements to interior streets and rights-of-way to address
traffic issues and improve pedestrian access. However, the highways are controlled by WSDOT. She noted that WSDOT
has invested $500,000 to research and study congestion near the sewer treatment plant, including the Gorst area. Ms.
Grueter said the EIS indicates that a mixed-use pattern with an increase in jobs (not as much as Alternatives 1 and 2) and
adding more residential would actually reduce the amount of congestion on the state routes by about 5%. Traffic is a
problem regardless of the alternative, but Alternative 3 would result in slightly less congestion. Chair Jose pointed out that
residential development would spread trips throughout the day. Commercial uses would have a greater impact on traffic
during the peak times.
Chair Jose asked staff to address what requirements would be put in place for the Gorst Mixed Use Zone to protect the
watershed and stream. Ms. Grueter answered that all of the alternatives would have a requirement to comply with critical
area and shoreline regulations. For the version of the subarea plan that would come before the Com mission in the fall, they
are considering incentives to help development back away from the creek. The advantage of the Gorst Mixed Use Zone in
Alternative 3 was more to recognize that most of the area is already in residential use, with very little commercial use. On e
commenter suggested either residential only or a reduced intensity pattern be extended through the Gorst Creek Floodplain.
A pattern of this type would still allow for a mixture of uses but would result in a smaller footprint. The concept might wor k
well as a middle ground between all mixed use and residenti al. Chair Jose commented that, either way, the mixed-use zone
would have sufficient protection for the streams. Ms. Grueter answered that it could. One of the mitigation measures called
out in the EIS is the possibility of extending the Low-Intensity Waterfront Zone to further reinforce protection of the creek
beyond just the buffer.
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 10 of 11
Ms. Daniels advised that, earlier in the day, the Kitsap County Planning Commission indicated support for expanding the
Low-Intensity Waterfront Zone to include the larger triangular portion of the Gorst Mixed Use Zone that is locate d west of
Highway 3. She asked the Commission to share their thoughts on expanding the Low-Intensity Waterfront Zone to the
properties that surround the creek or are located within the floodpl ain. This would allow the City to apply stricter
requirements. Commissioner Dinkuhn indicated support for this change. She felt it would be a more responsible approach
considering the possibility that the area will continue to flood until changes are ma de. It is also important to keep in mind
that sea levels are anticipated to rise, and it would be irresponsible to develop homes and businesses in the areas that migh t be
affected by rising tides.
In response to staff’s request for feedback related to the proposed zoning for the smaller triangular portion of the Gorst Mixed
Use Zone that is located south of Highway 3, Chair Jose pointed out that a mixed-use zone can allow both residential and
commercial development and allows a developer to determine what is in his/her best interest to develop. Zoning the
properties as mixed use would allow market demand determine the type of development that takes place. He expressed his
belief that Gorst Mixed Use is a more appropriate zone for this area.
Chair Jose asked if extending the Low-Intensity Waterfront Zone further to the west would create more nonconformity. Ms.
Grueter said that, while they have not yet written the use allowances, it is possible to prohibit residential uses on the
shoreline side of the highway, but allow both residential and commercial uses on the properties west of Highway 3 to reflect
the pattern of current development. Ms. Spencer asked if it would be possible to maintain this area as a Gorst Mixed Use
Zone, but with a low-intensity overlay. Ms. Grueter agreed that is another option the Commission could consider. Chair
Jose asked if a low-intensity overlay would create more nonconformity than a straight mixed-use zone. Ms. Daniels pointed
out that the majority of the properties along the creek are developed as residential. Chair Jose noted that most property
owners in this area would likely favor the Gorst Mixed Use Zone, which would allow for more development options. He
emphasized that, regardless of the zoning, rules would be in place to protect the shoreline. He questioned if the Commission
was in favor of providing more flexibility for property owners while still retaining the protections, or if they to want to ramp
up the protections beyond those proposed in Alternative 3. The majority of the Commission indicated a preference for
zoning the triangular property west of Highway 3 Gorst Mixed Use, but with an overlay or some other method of providing
additional protection for the creek.
Commissioner Dinkuhn agreed that the Gorst Mixed Use Zone would offer more flexibility, but the Commission must also
keep in mind the community they want to create. If they focus on this area as becoming a green space that people want to
live around rather than giving them more opportunities to live in it, it could be a better place. Rather than focusing on the
commercial potential, they should focus on creating a reason for people to visit and recreate in the area. She noted that th e
Gorst area has a very negative reputation at this time. Development needs to be more aggressively focused on creating a
positive environment that people want to live and play in. Vice Chair Tift agreed with Commissioner Dinkuhn. Gorst has
not changed for many years, and the Commission should focus on what will make the area attractive to new families.
Although not within the City’s purview, highway improvements will be key to making the area more attractive and desirable.
Commissioner Dinkuhn pointed out that if the area is developed like it is or without an intense focus on it being more of a
green space, it runs the risk of becoming rental propert y. People will not stay in the area for a long time, so they will not be
as invested in the community. If they focus on developing the area to become a place of pride, the area will have an entirely
different feel and demographic for social economics.
Vice Chair Tift pointed out that if the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) develops as per the adopted plan, Gorst woul d
become a much more attractive location for redevelopment, as well. That being the case, Alternative 3 has the potential to
make the Gorst Subarea a destination. Ms. Daniels said people who had have lived in Gorst for more than 40 years
participated in the community workshop and they take pride in their community. However, she acknowledged that there is
room for improvement.
Chair Jose observed that development is taking place on properties near the Gorst Subarea, and it is anticipated that the mine
property will be redeveloped into more than 400 residential homes. He expressed his belief that the subarea will naturally
become a center and key neighborhood for the City, and this is the City’s opportunity to shape what the neighborhood will
look like.
Draft
Bremerton Planning Commission Minutes
July 16, 2013 ~ Page 11 of 11
BUSINESS MEETING
Chair Report
Chair Jose reported that he continues to be involved in the Gorst Subarea Planning Process as a member of the Advisory
Committee, and he attended the June 20th community workshop. He invited the Commissioners to share their ideas so he
can express them at the Advisory Committee meetings.
Director Report
Ms. Spencer recognized Ms. Floyd for her excellent work on the proposed zoning code amendments. The amendments were
not easy to draft, and she spent a lot of time considering different options for solving the problems. She came up with a
sophisticated, yet simple, solution for the Commission’s consideration that remains true to the Comprehensive Plan but still
allows development to occur. She explained that when the zoning code was written, different staff members worked on each
of the chapters, which resulted in a number of inconsistencies. The proposal brought forward by Ms. Floyd fixed a number
of problems with the existing code.
Ms. Spencer announced that Kitsap and Jefferson Counties have been nominated by Naval Base Kitsap to be a candidate to
participate in a joint land-use study funded by the Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment . The next step is
to go forward with an actual application to receive grant funding. Under the Growth Management Act, the City and County
is required to update its Comprehensive Plan by 2016. The plan must many issues including affordable housing, to
transportation, to historic preservation, and others. The plan must also ensure that the land use decisions do not impact
military operations. It is exciting that the City’s Comprehensive Plan update will be supported by grant funding for the joi nt
land-use study. She advised that the City Council will take action on the City of Bremerton’s participation in the study at
their next meeting. Kitsap County will be the lead in submitting the grant application, which is due by August. It is
anticipated that the study will begin in early 2014 and that the process will include design charettes and community open
houses.
Ms. Spencer announced that Parks and Recreation Department is undertaking a major effort to update the Parks, Recreation
and Open Space Plan, and a general public meeting is scheduled for July 23rd at the Sheridan Park Community Center starting
at 5:30 p.m. The Commissioners are invited to attend and participate in the process.
Ms. Spencer reminded the Commission that their August meeting has been cancelled. The next regular meeting will be
September 17th.
Old Business
There was no old business to come before the Commission.
New Business
No new business was scheduled on the agenda.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:12 p.m.
Respectively Submitted by:
______________________________ ______________________________
Andrea L Spencer Greg Jose
AICP, Executive Secretary Chair, Planning Commission
1
Zoning Code Amendments
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City
of Bremerton, Washington, making amendments to the
Zoning Code - BMC Title 20, to increase the SEPA
threshold exemptions, modify drive-through requirements,
and adjust front yard setback requirements for commercial
properties.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance 4950 on November 30,
2005 establishing a new Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, through practical use and application of the Zoning Code the
need for modification has been identified; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has established a procedure for
amending the Zoning Code in Title 20.18.020 (d) of the Bremerton Municipal Code
(BMC), which requires amendments to the Zoning Code to be both consistent with the
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and to be consistent with other applicable
rules and regulations; and
WHEREAS, these amendments are consistent with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan, County Wide Planning Policies, The State Growth Management
Act, and other applicable regulations and ordinances; and
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2013 the Planning Commission conducted a
workshop on the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, on June 28, 2013 the proposed Zoning Code amendments
were circulated to the State Agencies for the requisite 60-day review and comment period
and the City received conformation on July 1, 2013 that the notice was received; and
WHEREAS, on June 28, 2013 a SEPA DNS was issued for the proposed
action with an administrative appeal deadline of July 15, 2013 and no appeals were filed;
and
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2013 the public was notified by a legal
advertisement in the Kitsap Sun of the opportunity to make comment and participate in
the public hearing held by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013 the Planning Commission conducted a
public hearing on the Zoning Code amendments and formulated a recommendation to
forward the amendments for City Council consideration; and
2
Zoning Code Amendments
WHEREAS, on August 24 ,2013 the public was notified by a legal
advertisement in the Kitsap Sun of the opportunity to make comment and participate in
the public hearing by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on September 4, 2013 the City Council conducted a public
hearing and considered all testimony prior to their decision.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The findings and conclusions adopted by the Planning
Commission attached hereto as Exhibit A are adopted and incorporated as if set forth
fully herein.
SECTION 2. Section 20.04.100 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Use of Categorical Exemptions” is hereby amended by adding a new subsection
as follows:
20.04.100 USE OF CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS
(a) Whenever a department within the City receives an application for a
license or, in the case of governmental proposals, the department within the City initiates
the proposal, the Planning Department shall determine whether the license and/or the
proposal is exempt. The Planning Department's determination that a proposal is exempt
shall be final and not subject to administrative review. If a proposal is exempt, none of
the procedural requirements of this chapter apply to the proposal. The City shall not
require completion of an environmental checklist for an exempt proposal.
(b) In determining whether or not a proposal is exempt, the Planning
Department shall make certain that the proposal is properly defined, and shall identify the
governmental licenses required (WAC 197-11-060). If a proposal includes exempt and
nonexempt actions, the Planning Department shall determine the lead agency even if the
license application that triggers the Department's consideration is exempt.
(c) If a proposal includes both exempt and nonexempt actions, the City may
authorize exempt actions prior to compliance with the procedural requirements of this
chapter, except that:
(1) The City shall not give authorization for:
(i) Any nonexempt action;
(ii) Any action that would have an adverse environmental
impact; or
(iii) Any action that would limit the choice of alternatives.
(2) The responsible official may withhold approval of an exempt
action that would lead to modification of the physical environment, when such
modification would serve no purpose if nonexempt action(s) were not approved; and
(3) The responsible official may withhold approval of exempt actions
that would lead to substantial financial expenditures by a private applicant when the
expenditures would serve no purpose if nonexempt action(s) were not approved.
3
Zoning Code Amendments
(d) Threshold levels for categorical exemptions. Pursuant to WAC 197-11-
800(1)(c) and (1)(d), cities may adopt raised levels of threshold exemptions for certain
types of actions, except as provided in WAC 197-11-305 and 197-11-800(1)(a). As
authorized pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(c) and (1)(d) the following threshold
exemptions are adopted:
(1) The construction or location of 30 or fewer single family
residential units.
(2) The construction or location of 60 or fewer multifamily residential
units.
(3) The construction of an office, school, commercial, recreational,
service or storage building with 30,000 square feet of gross floor area, and with
associated parking facilities designed for 90 parking spaces;
(4) The construction of a parking facility designed for 90 parking
spaces;
(5) Any landfill or excavation of 1,000 cubic yards throughout the
lifetime of the fill or excavation, and any fill or excavation classified as Class I, II, or III
forest practice under RCW 76.09.050 or regulations thereunder.
SECTION 3. Section 20.42.040 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Definitions” is hereby amended as follows by amending the definition of
“Drive-through facility,” deleting the definition of “Drive-through lanes,” and adding the
definition of “Stacking Lane” as follows:
20.42.040 DEFINITIONS
"Drive-through facility" means an automobile-oriented component of a
permitted use that includes both service window(s) and a stacking lane facility designed
primarily for drive-through trade, and which provides service and caters to patrons while
in their motor vehicles. Drive-through facilities conduct a majority of their business
transactions with customers served in their motor vehicles. This does not include gas
stations, service stations, and auto repair garages.(See BMC 20.44.120).
"Drive-through lanes" means a secondary or ancillary drive-up service at a
business that is primarily oriented to walk-in or sit-down customers. The business must
conduct a majority of transactions with walk-in or sit-down customers. (See also BMC
20.44.120, Ancillary drive-through lanes.)
“Stacking Lane” means a designated driving lane provided for vehicles waiting
for, receiving, and exiting after receiving a service at a drive up window from a permitted
use. The lane is physically separated from other traffic and pedestrian circulation on the
property and includes adequate area for cars to wait for service.
4
Zoning Code Amendments
SECTION 4. Section 20.44.120 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Ancillary Drive-Through Lanes” is hereby amended as follows:
20.44.120 ANCILLARY DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIESLANES.
Ancillary drive-through lanes as defined in BMC 20.42.040 may be permitted in
conjunction with an allowable principal use, unless drive-through lanes are expressly
prohibited in the zone district.
(a) Applicability: Drive-through facilities are an accessory to a principal use
of a structure and therefore are only allowed when found in association with a permitted
use. Drive-through facilities are expressly prohibited in some zoning districts regardless
of the principal use.
(1) Exception: While generally prohibited within the NCC and DCC
zones, drive-through facilities may be permitted in the following areas provided the
business has direct vehicular access from either Wheaton Way or Kitsap Way:
(i) Properties zoned Neighborhood Center Core (NCC) that
are within the Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center; and
(ii) Properties within the Wheaton Riddell Sub-Area Plan.
(2) Drive-through facilities standards within this section apply to the
construction of new drive-through facilities, the addition of a drive-through facility to
existing developments, and/or the relocation of an existing drive-through facility onsite.
(b) Site Design Requirements: All drive-through facilities shall comply with
the following requirements:
(1) Location: All efforts should be taken to locate the drive-through
facility towards the side and or rear of buildings. Drive-through facilities shall not be
located between the building and the street frontage except in the following
circumstances:
(i) Primary Frontage: A drive-through facility may be placed
between a building and the street frontage only when all other site designs have been
exhausted and are deemed unworkable by the Director. The drive-through facility shall
be fully screened from view of the fronting street through the use of features such as
sight-obscuring fencing, walls, trellises, and landscaping.
(ii) Secondary Frontage: When a site contains more than one
street frontage the drive-through facility may be located between the building and
secondary frontage only when all other site designs have been exhausted and found
unworkable. Screening from the secondary frontage is encouraged, but not required.
(2) Stacking: All drive-through facilities shall include a stacking lane
that provides room for a minimum of four (4) cars to line up behind the drive-through
window. For restaurant/food/drink uses the stacking lane shall provide room for a
minimum of six (6) cars.
(3) Design: The drive-through lane(s) shall be designed as a dedicated
lane, physically separated from parking areas and internal parking circulation aisles in
order to enhance pedestrian safety and provide screening from adjacent properties, and
right-of-way. A combination of the two of following shall be provided adjacent to the
drive-through lane(s):
5
Zoning Code Amendments
(i) Landscaped strips, islands, or berms that are a minimum of
three (3) feet wide and fifty (50) square feet in size are required in addition to all other
required landscaping areas. Said landscaped areas shall include a mix of ground covers
and shrubs that act as a barrier between the drive-through lane and adjacent properties,
right-of-way, and parking area;
(ii) Hedges, decorative walls, fencing, or trellis that act as a
visual barrier between the drive-through lane(s) and adjacent properties, right-of-way and
parking areas;
(iii) Decorative pavement, alternative materials (bricks,
stamped concrete), or other durable ground treatment that clearly separates the drive-
through lane(s) from other driving and parking areas onsite that will withstand heavy
traffic conditions found in association with drive-through lanes. Paint striping does not
meet this requirement.
(4) Signage:
(i) Each ordering location shall have a maximum of one menu
board. One additional menu board may be placed adjacent to the stacking lane for
patrons waiting behind the ordering station. Each menu board sign shall not exceed thirty
(30) square feet and have a maximum height of seven (7) feet.
(ii) Menu boards shall be located in a landscaped strip or island
no smaller than three (3) feet wide and fifty (50) square feet in total size. This
landscaping area shall be in addition to all other required landscaping. The menu
board(s) shall be oriented away from public streets and be intended for viewing by drive-
through patrons only. Screening of the menu board may be required when the board is
located adjacent to the right-of-way or neighboring properties. Screening shall ensure the
board is not readable from the surrounding properties or street.
(5) Pedestrian features: In order to enhance safe pedestrian access,
designated walkways from all onsite parking areas and from the public sidewalk to a
building entry, shall be provided as follows:
(i) Walkways shall be a minimum five (5) feet in width,
clearly marked and easily distinguished from driving surfaces by using a combination of
landscaping strips or islands that delineate the pedestrian walkways; and
(ii) Walkways shall include at least one of the following
treatments: decorative paving, stamped/stained concrete or raised walkways with
alternative materials (such as brick, cobblestone, and decorative pavers) to clearly
indicate the safe walking route. Walkways through heavy traffic areas such as the drive-
through must be made of durable materials able to withstand heavy traffic conditions.
SECTION 5. Section 20.48.260 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Drive-Through Stacking Requirements” is hereby amended as follows:
20.48.260 DRIVE-THROUGH STACKING REQUIREMENTS.
Drive-through stacking requirements can be found in Chapter 11.12 BMC
20.44.120.
6
Zoning Code Amendments
SECTION 6. Subsection 20.62.060(a) in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Development Standards” within the Commercial Corridor Zone is hereby
amended as follows:
20.62.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(a) Lot development shall be in accordance with the following standards,
unless allowed for otherwise by law:
(1) Maximum front yard setback: Tenfive (105) feet. At least sixty-
five (65) percent of the building’s front facade must meet the maximum front yard
setback. The setback may be increased if the Director finds that such increase is the
minimum necessary to facilitate a superior site design. In order to obtain approval for an
increased setback, the applicant shall submit a written analysis establishing how the
project facilitates superior site design is the minimum necessary, is consistent with
specific goals and policies within the Comprehensive Plan, and is compliant with all
applicable sections of the BMC. The following list identifies examples of circumstances
where increased setbacks may be found to be appropriate:
(i) When the site includes more than one (1) street frontage;
(ii) To accommodate existing topography, utilities, or other
physical site constraints that make compliance with the setback infeasible;
(iii) To accommodate phasing of infill development;
(iv) On sites that are significantly developed with existing
legally established nonconforming uses or structures whereby strict code compliance will
not facilitate effective circulation; or
(v) For projects that in the opinion of the Director provide
enhanced public amenities within the setback area which includes, but is not limited to,
the following: public plazas, increased landscaping, architectural features, improved
pedestrian connections.
(2) Minimum side yard setback: zero (0) except when adjacent to the low
density residential zone (R-10) where a ten (10) to twenty (20) foot visual screen is
required pursuant to BMC 20.50.050(b).
(3) Minimum rear yard setback: zero (0), except when adjacent to the low
density residential zone (R-10) where a ten (10) to twenty (20) foot visual screen is
required pursuant to BMC 20.50.050(b).
(4) No maximum density for secondary residential uses.
(5) Maximum building coverage: fifty (50) percent unless increased per
subsection (b) of this section. In no case shall maximum lot coverage exceed seventy-five
(75) percent.
(6) Maximum development coverage is seventy-five (75) percent unless
increased per subsection (b) of this section. In no case shall maximum lot coverage
exceed ninety-five (95) percent.
(7) Maximum height: forty-five (45) feet, except that structures within one
hundred (100) feet of the low density residential (R-10) zone shall not exceed thirty-five
(35) feet in height.
(8) Maximum building heights within the downtown regional center are
pursuant to the Downtown Subarea Plan and shall supersede subsection (a)(7) of this
section.
7
Zoning Code Amendments
SECTION 7. Section 20.62.080 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Parking Requirements” within the Commercial Corridor Zone is hereby
amended as follows:
20.62.080 PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
On-site parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 20.48 BMC, and the
following standards shall be met:
(a) On-site parking shall be to the rear or to the side of buildings on the site
and shall not occupy more than fifty (50) percent of the site frontage facing the arterial
street frontage(s). The site frontage includes all of the area between the right-of-way and
front building wall which applies to the entire length of the property regardless of
building width. Corner lots have two (2) site frontages as they are positioned on two (2)
street frontages.
(b) All efforts shall be taken to avoid installing Pparking shall not be placed
on street corners. Parking located between the building frontage and street corners shall
be fully screened. Screening shall consist of the following:
(1) A four (4) foot tall decorative wall within the front yard
landscaping area that fully screens the parking areas. The wall shall be located such that
it blocks views of the parking from the right-of-way. For long spans of frontage (one
hundred (100) feet or more), the wall shall include modular articulation to add
architectural variety.
(2) Shrubs or other alternative materials may be substituted for the
wall, provided it is demonstrated that the shrubs/alternative will provide equal to or better
visual screening than the wall. Shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3) feet tall at time of
installation and shall be additional to the landscaping required in BMC 20.52.
(3) Openings may be required within a wall section in order to provide
a sidewalk from the right-of-way to the building entry. The entry shall be the minimum
necessary to accommodate a sidewalk that is a minimum of five (5) feet in width, clearly
marked, and distinguished from driving surfaces by using decorative paving,
stamped/stained concrete, or raised walkways with alternative materials (such as brick,
cobblestone, decorative pavers). Paint striping does not meet this requirement.
(c) Access to parking may be from adjacent non-principal arterial streets, or
from driveways off of the principal arterial.
(d) Driveways providing access to parking area shall be well marked.
SECTION 8. Subsection 20.64.060(a) in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Development Standards” within the Wheaton Way Redevelopment Corridor
Zone is hereby amended as follows:
20.64.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(a) Lot development shall be in accordance with the following standards,
unless allowed for otherwise by law:
(1) Maximum front yard setback: is Tenfive (105) feet. except that
front yard setback may be increased if the Director finds that such increase is necessary
to accommodate pedestrian features per BMC 20.64.070 or equivalent. At least sixty-five
8
Zoning Code Amendments
(65) percent of the building’s front facade must meet the maximum front yard setback;
The setback may be increased if the Director finds that such increase is the minimum
necessary to facilitate a superior site design. In order to obtain approval for an increased
setback, the applicant shall submit a written analysis establishing how the project
facilitates superior site design is the minimum necessary, is consistent with specific goals
and policies within the Comprehensive Plan, and is compliant with all applicable sections
of the BMC. The following list identifies examples of circumstances where increased
setbacks may be found to be appropriate:
(i) When the site includes more than one (1) street frontage;
(ii) To accommodate existing topography, utilities, or other
physical site constraints that make compliance with the setback infeasible;
(iii) To accommodate phasing of infill development;
(iv) On sites that are significantly developed with existing
legally established nonconforming uses or structures whereby strict code compliance will
not facilitate effective circulation; or
(v) For projects that in the opinion of the Director provide
enhanced public amenities within the setback area which includes, but is not limited to,
the following: public plazas, increased landscaping, architectural features, improved
pedestrian connections.
(2) Minimum side yard setback: zero (0) except when adjacent to the low
density residential zone (R-10) where a ten (10) to twenty (20) foot visual screen is
required pursuant to BMC 20.50.050(b);
(3) Minimum rear yard setback: zero (0) except when adjacent to the low
density residential zone (R-10) where a ten (10) to twenty (20) foot visual screen is
required pursuant to BMC 20.50.050(b);
(4) Maximum building coverage: fifty (50) percent unless increased per
subsection (b) of this section. In no case shall maximum lot coverage exceed seventy-five
(75) percent;
(5) Maximum development coverage: seventy-five (75) percent unless
increased per subsection (b) of this section. In no case shall maximum lot coverage
exceed ninety-five (95) percent;
(6) Maximum height: forty (40) feet, and structures within one hundred (100)
feet of the low density residential (R-10) zone shall not exceed three (3) stories in height.
SECTION 9. Section 20.64.080 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Development Standards” within the Wheaton Way Redevelopment Corridor
Zone is hereby amended as follows:
20.64.080 PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
On-site parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 20.48 BMC and the
following standards shall be met:
(a) On-site parking shall be to the rear or to the side of buildings on the site
and shall not occupy more than fiftyforty (4050) percent of the site frontage facing the
arterial street frontage(s). The site frontage includes the area between the right-of-way
and front building wall which applies to the entire length of the property regardless of
9
Zoning Code Amendments
building width. Corner lots have two (2) site frontages as they are positioned on two (2)
street frontages.
(b) All efforts shall be taken to avoid placing parking on street corners.
Parking located between the building frontage and street corners shall be fully screened.
Screening shall consist of the following:
(1) A four (4) foot tall decorative wall within the front yard
landscaping area that fully screens the parking areas. The wall shall be located such that
it blocks views of the parking from the right-of-way. For long spans of frontage (one
hundred (100) feet or more), the wall shall include modular articulation to add
architectural variety.
(2) Shrubs or other alternative materials may be substituted for the
wall, provided it is demonstrated that the shrubs/alternative will provide equal to or better
visual screening than the wall. Shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3) feet tall at time of
installation and shall be additional to the landscaping required in Chapter 20.52 BMC.
(3) Openings may be required within a wall section in order to
provide a sidewalk from the right-of-way to the building entry. The entry shall be the
minimum necessary to accommodate a sidewalk that is a minimum of five (5) feet in
width, clearly marked, and distinguished from driving surfaces by using decorative
paving, stamped/stained concrete, or raised walkways with alternative materials (such as
brick, cobblestone, decorative pavers). Paint striping does not meet this requirement.
(c) Access to parking may be from adjacent non- principal arterial streets, or
from driveways off of the principal arterial.
(d) Driveways providing access to parking area shall be well-defined, highly
visible entryways.
(e) On-street parking shall be allowed to help satisfy parking requirements,
provided paved street widths provide adequate room pursuant to City standards for on-
street parking.
SECTION 10. Section 20.66.050 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Prohibited Uses” within the Neighborhood Center Zone is hereby amended as
follows:
20.66.050 PROHIBITED USES.
(a) Drive-through lanes except within the Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center
when the business has direct vehicular access from Kitsap Way.
SECTION 11. Subsection 20.66.060(a) in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Development Standards” within the Neighborhood Center Zone is hereby
amended as follows:
20.66.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(a) Maximum Ffront yard setback: no minimum front yard setback. The
maximum front yard setback shall be ten (10) feet. At least eighty (80) sixty-five (65)
percent of the building’s front facade shall meet the maximum front yard setback. The
setback may be increased if the Director finds that such increase is the minimum
necessary to facilitate a superior site design. In order to obtain approval for an increased
10
Zoning Code Amendments
setback, the applicant shall submit a written analysis establishing how the project
facilitates superior site design is the minimum necessary, is consistent with specific goals
and policies within the Comprehensive Plan, and is compliant with all applicable sections
of the BMC. The following list identifies examples of circumstances where increased
setbacks may be found to be appropriate:
(1) When the site includes more than one (1) street frontage;
(2) To accommodate existing topography, utilities, or other physical
site constraints that make compliance with the setback infeasible;
(3) To accommodate phasing of infill development;
(4) On sites that are significantly developed with existing legally
established nonconforming uses or structures whereby strict code compliance will not
facilitate effective circulation; or
(5) For projects that in the opinion of the Director provide enhanced
public amenities within the setback area which includes, but is not limited to, the
following: public plazas, increased landscaping, architectural features, improved
pedestrian connections.
SECTION 12. Section 20.66.080 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Parking Requirements” within the Neighborhood Center Zone is hereby
amended as follows:
20.66.080 PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Parking shall meet the standards of Chapter 20.48 BMC and the following
requirements:
(a) For nonresidential uses, the minimum parking requirement is one (1)
space per employee, plus one (1) handicapped-accessible space;
(b) On-site parking for nonresidential uses shall not exceed one (1) space per
three hundred (300) square feet of floor area;
(c) On-site parking shall be to the rear or to the side of buildings on the site
and shall not occupy more than fifty (50) percent of the site frontage facing the arterial
street(s). The site frontage includes the area between the right-of-way and front building
wall which applies to the entire length of the property regardless of building width.
Corner lots have two (2) site frontages as they are positioned on two (2) street frontages.
(d) All efforts shall be taken to avoid placing parking on street corners.
Parking located between the building frontage and street corners shall be fully screened
as follows:
(1) A four (4) foot tall decorative wall within the front yard
landscaping area that fully screens the parking areas. The wall shall be located such that
it blocks views of the parking from the right-of-way. For long spans of frontage (one
hundred (100) feet or more), the wall shall include modular articulation to add
architectural variety.
(i) Alternate architectural features, shrubs may be substituted
for the wall, provided it is demonstrated that the shrubs/alternative will provide equal to
or better visual screening than the wall. Shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3) feet tall
at time of installation and shall be additional to the landscaping required in Chapter 20.52
BMC.
11
Zoning Code Amendments
(ii) Openings and architectural features may be required within
a wall section in order to tie the wall feature into the architecture of the building and to
provide pedestrian access. The entry shall be the minimum necessary to accommodate a
sidewalk that is a minimum of five (5) feet in width, clearly marked, and distinguished
from driving surfaces by using decorative paving, stamped/stained concrete, or raised
walkways with alternative materials (such as brick, cobblestone, decorative pavers).
Paint striping does not meet this requirement.
(de) Access to parking shall be provided from the adjacent public facilities per
the following priority:
(1) First, from an alley if available; if an alley is not available, then
from local street;
(2) If an alley is not available, from a nonarterial street, if available;If
neither are available, then from a non-principal arterial street;
(3) If neither an alley nor a nonarterial street are available, from an
arterial If none of the above are available then from a principal arterial street.
Project applicants shall be required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City
that access design has been considered with the preceding priorities. The applicant shall
demonstrate that the proposed access is provided from the highest priority facility per the
above list;
(ef) Driveways providing access to parking shall be well marked;
(fg) Reduction in number of required parking spaces. The Director may reduce
the number of required parking spaces on a site by up to ten (10) when a remodel,
expansion, alteration, or change in the use or tenancy of an existing building occurs,
provided:
(1) For sites with multiple uses or structures, the reduction shall be applied to
the entire site and not to individual uses.
(2) When a use is nonconforming to the required number of off-street parking
spaces, it shall not be allowed to reduce the number of existing spaces.
SECTION 13. Section 20.70.050 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Prohibited Uses” within the District Center Zone is hereby amended as follows:
20.70.050 PROHIBITED USES.
(a) Drive-through lanes except within the Wheaton/Riddell District Center
when the business has direct vehicular access from Wheaton Way.
SECTION 14. Subsection 20.70.060(a) in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Development Standards” within the District Center Zone is hereby amended as
follows:
20.70.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
Lot development shall be in accordance with the following unless allowed for
otherwise by law:
(a) MaximumF front yard setback: no minimum front yard setback. The
maximum front yard setback is ten (10) feet. At least sixty-five (65)eighty (80) percent of
12
Zoning Code Amendments
a building’s front facade shall meet the maximum front yard setback. The setback may
be increased if the Director finds that such increase is the minimum necessary to facilitate
a superior site design. In order to obtain approval for an increased setback, the applicant
shall submit a written analysis establishing how the project facilitates superior site design
is the minimum necessary, is consistent with specific goals and policies within the
Comprehensive Plan, and is compliant with all applicable sections of the BMC. The
following list identifies examples of circumstances where increased setbacks may be
found to be appropriate:
(1) When the site includes more than one (1) street frontage;
(2) To accommodate existing topography, utilities, or other physical
site constraints that make compliance with the setback infeasible;
(3) To accommodate phasing of infill development;
(4) On sites that are significantly developed with existing legally
established nonconforming uses or structures whereby strict code compliance will not
facilitate effective circulation; or
(5) For projects that in the opinion of the Director provide enhanced
public amenities within the setback area which includes, but is not limited to, the
following: public plazas, increased landscaping, architectural features, improved
pedestrian connections.
SECTION 15. Subsection 20.70.070(b) in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Design Standards” within the District Center Zone is hereby amended as
follows:
20.70.070 DESIGN STANDARDS.
(b) Site Design. In addition to other standards provided in this chapter, site
design shall meet the following requirements:
(1) No less than thirty (30) percent of the frontage of a site along arterial
streets, as measured in lineal feet, shall be occupied by commercial structures set back ten
(10) feet or less from a public right-of-way. In addition, such commercial structures shall
be either mixed-use structures with residential or office uses above or be constructed so
as to allow future addition of at least two (2) additional stories containing residential or
office uses.
(21) Circulation. Clearly defined pedestrian and vehicle circulation
routes shall be provided such that all portions of the site are linked.
(32) Storage. Outside storage of any kind is prohibited with the
exception of garbage cans and/or dumpsters. Garbage cans and dumpsters shall be placed
in an enclosure per BMC 20.46.120. No garbage enclosure shall be permitted between a
street and the front of a building.
SECTION 16. Section 20.70.080 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Parking Requirements” within the District Center Zone is hereby amended as
follows:
20.70.080 PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
13
Zoning Code Amendments
Parking shall meet the standards of Chapter 20.48 BMC and the following
requirements:
(a) For nonresidential uses, the minimum parking requirement is one (1)
space per employee, plus one (1) handicapped-accessible space.
(b) On-site parking for nonresidential uses shall not exceed four one (41)
spaces per three hundred (300)one thousand (1,000) square feet of floor area.
(c) On-site parking shall be to the rear or side of buildings facing the arterial
street and shall not occupy more than fifty (50) percent of the site frontage facing the
arterial street(s). The site frontage includes the area between the right-of-way and front
building wall which applies to the entire length of the property regardless of building
width. Corner lots have two (2) site frontages as they are positioned on two (2) street
frontages.
(d) All efforts shall be taken to avoid placing parking on street corners.
Parking located between the building frontage and street corners shall be fully screened
as follows:
(1) A four (4) foot tall decorative wall within the front yard
landscaping area that fully screens the parking areas. The wall shall be located such that
it blocks views of the parking from the right-of-way. For long spans of frontage (one
hundred (100) feet or more), the wall shall include modular articulation to add
architectural variety.
(i) Alternate architectural features, shrubs may be substituted
for the wall, provided it is demonstrated that the shrubs/alternative will provide equal to
or better visual screening than the wall. Shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3) feet tall
at time of installation and shall be additional to the landscaping required in Chapter 20.52
BMC.
(ii) Openings and architectural features may be required within
a wall section in order to tie the wall feature into the architecture of the building and to
provide pedestrian access. The entry shall be the minimum necessary to accommodate a
sidewalk that is a minimum of five (5) feet in width, clearly marked, and distinguished
from driving surfaces by using decorative paving, stamped/stained concrete, or raised
walkways with alternative materials (such as brick, cobblestone, decorative pavers).
Paint striping does not meet this requirement.
(de) Access to parking shall be provided from the adjacent public facilities per
the following priority:
(1) First, from an alley if available; if an alley is not available, then
from local street;
(2) If neither are available, then from a non-principal arterial street;
(3) If none of the above are available then from a principal arterial
street. ) If an alley is not available, from a nonarterial street, if available;
(3) If neither an alley nor a nonarterial street are available, from an
arterial.
(e) Project applicants shall be required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
City that access design has been considered with the preceding priorities. The applicant
shall demonstrate that the proposed access is provided from the highest priority facility
per the above list.
(f) Driveways providing access to parking shall be well marked.
14
Zoning Code Amendments
(g) Reduction in number of required parking spaces. The Director may reduce
the number of required parking spaces on a site by up to ten (10) when a remodel,
expansion, alteration, or change in the use or tenancy of an existing building occurs,
provided:
(1) For sites with multiple uses or structures, the reduction shall be
applied to the entire site and not to individual uses.
(2) When a use is nonconforming to the required number of off-street
parking spaces, it shall not be allowed to reduce the number of existing spaces.
SECTION 17. Subsection 20.82.060(a) in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Development Standards” within the Neighborhood Business Zone is hereby
amended as follows:
20.82.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
Lot development requirements shall be in accordance with the following
standards unless allowed for by law otherwise:
(a) Maximum front yard setback: ten (10) feet. At least sixty-five
(65)seventy-five (75) percent of a building’s front facade must meet the maximum front
yard setback. The setback may be increased if the Director finds that such increase is the
minimum necessary to facilitate a superior site design. In order to obtain approval for an
increased setback, the applicant shall submit a written analysis establishing how the
project facilitates superior site design is the minimum necessary, is consistent with
specific goals and policies within the Comprehensive Plan, and is compliant with all
applicable sections of the BMC. The following list identifies examples of circumstances
where increased setbacks may be found to be appropriate:
(1) When the site includes more than one (1) street frontage;
(2) To accommodate existing topography, utilities, or other physical
site constraints that make compliance with the setback infeasible;
(3) To accommodate phasing of infill development;
(4) On sites that are significantly developed with existing legally
established nonconforming uses or structures whereby strict code compliance will not
facilitate effective circulation; or
(5) For projects that in the opinion of the Director provide enhanced
public amenities within the setback area which includes, but is not limited to, the
following: public plazas, increased landscaping, architectural features, improved
pedestrian connections.
SECTION 18. Section 20.82.080 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Parking Requirements” within the Neighborhood Business Zone is hereby
amended as follows:
20.82.080 PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
Parking shall meet the standards of Chapter 20.48 BMC and the following.:
(a) On-site parking shall be to the rear or to the side of buildings on the site
and shall not occupy more than fiftyforty (4050) percent of the site frontage facing the
arterial street frontage(s). The site frontage includes the area between the right-of-way
15
Zoning Code Amendments
and front building wall which applies to the entire length of the property regardless of
building width. Corner lots have two (2) site frontages as they are positioned on two (2)
street frontages.
(b) All efforts shall be taken to avoid placing parking on street corners.
Parking located between the building frontage and street corners shall be fully screened
as follows:
(1) A four (4) foot tall decorative wall within the front yard
landscaping area that fully screens the parking areas. The wall shall be located such that
it blocks views of the parking from the right-of-way. For long spans of frontage (one
hundred (100) feet or more), the wall shall include modular articulation to add
architectural variety.
(i) Alternate architectural features, shrubs may be substituted
for the wall, provided it is demonstrated that the shrubs/alternative will provide equal to
or better visual screening than the wall. Shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3) feet tall
at time of installation and shall be additional to the landscaping required in Chapter 20.52
BMC.
(ii) Openings and architectural features may be required within
a wall section in order to tie the wall feature into the architecture of the building and to
provide pedestrian access. The entry shall be the minimum necessary to accommodate a
sidewalk that is a minimum of five (5) feet in width, clearly marked, and distinguished
from driving surfaces by using decorative paving, stamped/stained concrete, or raised
walkways with alternative materials (such as brick, cobblestone, decorative pavers).
Paint striping does not meet this requirement.
(c) Access to parking may be from adjacent non- principal arterial streets, or
from driveways off of the principal arterial.
(d) Driveways providing access to parking area shall be well-defined, highly
visible entryways.
SECTION 19. Subsection 20.84.060(a) in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Development Standards” within the Limited Commercial Zone is hereby
amended as follows:
20.84.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(a) Maximum front yard setback: ten (10) feet. At least sixty-five
(65)seventy-five (75) percent of a building’s front facade must meet the maximum front
yard setback. The setback may be increased if the Director finds that such increase is the
minimum necessary to facilitate a superior site design. In order to obtain approval for an
increased setback, the applicant shall submit a written analysis establishing how the
project facilitates superior site design is the minimum necessary, is consistent with
specific goals and policies within the Comprehensive Plan, and is compliant with all
applicable sections of the BMC. The following list identifies examples of circumstances
where increased setbacks may be found to be appropriate:
(1) When the site includes more than one (1) street frontage;
16
Zoning Code Amendments
(2) To accommodate existing topography, utilities, or other physical
site constraints that make compliance with the setback infeasible;
(3) To accommodate phasing of infill development;
(4) On sites that are significantly developed with existing legally
established nonconforming uses or structures whereby strict code compliance will not
facilitate effective circulation; or
(5) For projects that in the opinion of the Director provide enhanced
public amenities within the setback area which includes, but is not limited to, the
following: public plazas, increased landscaping, architectural features, improved
pedestrian connections.
SECTION 20. Section 20.84.080 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Parking Requirements” within the Limited Commercial Zone is hereby amended
as follows:
20.84.080 PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
Parking shall meet the standards of Chapter 20.48 BMC and the following:.
(a) On-site parking shall be to the rear or to the side of buildings on the site
and shall not occupy more than fifty (50) percent of the site frontage facing the arterial
street frontage(s). The site frontage includes the area between the right-of-way and front
building wall which applies to the entire length of the property regardless of building
width. Corner lots have two (2) site frontages as they are positioned on two (2) street
frontages.
(b) All efforts shall be taken to avoid placing parking on street corners.
Parking located between the building frontage and street corners shall be fully screened
as follows:
(1) A four (4) foot tall decorative wall within the front yard
landscaping area that fully screens the parking areas. The wall shall be located such that
it blocks views of the parking from the right-of-way. For long spans of frontage (one
hundred (100) feet or more), the wall shall include modular articulation to add
architectural variety.
(2) Alternate architectural features, shrubs may be substituted for the
wall, provided it is demonstrated that the shrubs/alternative will provide equal to or better
visual screening than the wall. Shrubs shall be a minimum of three (3) feet tall at time of
installation and shall be additional to the landscaping required in Chapter 20.52 BMC.
(3) Openings and architectural features may be required within a wall
section in order to tie the wall feature into the architecture of the building and to provide
pedestrian access. The entry shall be the minimum necessary to accommodate a sidewalk
that is a minimum of five (5) feet in width, clearly marked, and distinguished from
driving surfaces by using decorative paving, stamped/stained concrete, or raised
walkways with alternative materials (such as brick, cobblestone, decorative pavers).
Paint striping does not meet this requirement.
(c) Access to parking may be from adjacent non- principal arterial streets, or
from driveways off of the principal arterial.
(d) Driveways providing access to parking area shall be well-defined, highly
visible entryways.
17
Zoning Code Amendments
SECTION 21. Section 20.92.020 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Outrightly Permitted Uses” within the Employment District Zone is hereby
amended as follows:
20.92.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES.
The following uses are permitted outright:
(a) Co-location of wireless telecommunications facilities per BMC 20.46.140;
(b) Community use facility;
(c) Day care facility, all;
(d) General office and business services;
(e) Finance, insurance and real estate (no drive-through facilities);
(f) General retail (no drive-through facilities);
(g) Hotels and lodging places;
(h) Medical offices;
(i) Outdoor athletic fields;
(j) Park playgrounds and open space, and parks;
(k) Personal service business;
(l) Physical fitness and health clubs;
(m) Public administration;
(n) Residential uses of the following types:
(1) Group residential facility - Class I;
(2) Multi-unit structure;
(3) Nursing convalescent home;
(4) Senior housing complex;
(5) Single unit structure, attached or detached;
(6) Townhouse;
(o) Restaurants and drinking places (no drive-through facilities);
(p) Schools and education uses;
(q) Transportation facility;
(r) Veterinary clinic;
(s) Worship and religious facility.
SECTION 22. Section 20.98.020 in the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled “Outrightly Permitted Uses” within the Institutional Zone is hereby amended as
follows:
20.98.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES.
The following uses are permitted:
(a) Co-location of wireless telecommunications facilities per BMC
20.46.140;
(b) Community facility;
(c) General office and business services;
(d General retail associated with an institution;
(e) Higher education and colleges;
(f) Hospitals;
18
Zoning Code Amendments
(g) Medical offices and clinics;
(h) Outdoor athletic fields and park playground and open spaces;
(i) Parking as a principal use;
(j) Public administration;
(k) Residential uses of the following types:
(1) Group residential facility - Class I;
(2) Nursing convalescent home;
(3) Senior housing complex;
(4) Single-unit dwelling unit, detached;
(5) Single-unit dwelling unit, attached;
(l) Restaurants (no drive-through facilities);
(m) Schools and education uses;
(n) Transportation facility;
(o) Welfare and charitable services and facility;
(p) Worship and religious facility.
SECTION 23. Severability. If any one or more sections, sub-sections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall
not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 24. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in
force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by
law.
PASSED by the City Council the___________ day of ____________________, 2013
_________________________________
GREG WHEELER, Council President
Approved this ________ day of ________________________, 2013
_________________________________
PATTY LENT, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ ________________________________
SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the________ day of ______________________, 2013
19
Zoning Code Amendments
EFFECTIVE the _________day of ______________________, 2013
ORDINANCE NO. ____________
R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Community Development\Zoning Code Amendments (2013).docx