The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/11/2012 Special as CITY COUNCIL 345 6 Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 ❑ Phone (360) 473 -5280 JULY 11, 2012 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5:00 PM — IN THE FIRST FLOOR CHAMBERS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THIS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING, THE COUNCIL WILL RECONVENE FOR A STUDY SESSION IN THE COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM LOCATED ON THE 6 TH FLOOR; A SEPARATE NOTICE AND AGENDA WILL BE ISSUED 1. CALL TO ORDER 5:00 P.M. Pledge of Allegiance 2. COMMUNITY MEETING A. Proposed ordinance adopting the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) Sub -Area Plan as part of the Comprehensive Plan; and amending Chapter 20.80 of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) to activate the Development Regulations — Doug McIntyre, Long -Range Planner (2" Presentation is scheduled on July 25, 2012; Public Hearing with Action is scheduled on August 1, 2012...) B. Proposed ordinance amending Chapter 20.04 of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) titled "State Environmental Policy Act" — Andrea Spencer — Director of Community Development (Public Hearing with Action is scheduled on July 18, 2012... ) C. Proposed ordinance adopting the Planned Action Ordinance for the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) — Doug McIntyre, Long -Range Planner (2" Presentation is scheduled on July 25, 2012; Public Hearing with Action is scheduled on August 1,2012 ... ) 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 4. ADJOURNMENT OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ® Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations please contact the City Clerk at (360) 473 -5323 by noon on the day preceding the Meeting. ,i x AGENDA BILL 1 CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ......................................................... ............................... SUBJECT: Public hearing on an ordinance Study Session Date July 11 & 25, 2012 adopting the South Kitsap Industrial Area COUNCIL MEETING Date August 1, 2012 (SKIA) Subarea Plan as part of the Department DCD Comprehensive Plan and amending BMC Presenter Doug McIntyre Chapter 20 80 to activate the development Phone 360 473 5845 regulations SUMMARY: The action before the Council is to conduct a public hearing and consider amendments to the Bremerton Municipal Code and Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) Subarea Plan The purpose of the Subarea Plan is to establish a development plan for the project area and create regulations to guide development, consistent with the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan SKIA, located in southwest Bremerton, comprises approximately 3,700 acres planned for industrial development and use A draft Subarea Plan has been prepared to guide the expected development in SKIA for the next twenty years, emphasizing economic development, fob creation, protection of natural systems, reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, more sustainable development patterns and buildings, and development of innovative and sustainable infrastructure ATTACHMENTS: 1) Proposed Ordinance Exhibit A) Planning Commission Findings and Conclusions for SKIA Subarea Plan Exhibit B) SKIA Subarea Plan (in notebook) FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) None APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR MAYOR RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Ordinance No to amend the Comprehensive Plan to include the SKIA Subarea Plan and amend BMC 20 80 to activate the development regulations detailed in the Plan STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing COUNCIL PRESIDENT COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 11/02/2011 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, adopting the SKIA Subarea Plan, amending the Comprehensive Plan by adding the SKIA Subarea Plan, and amending the Zoning Code Section 20 80 080(a) to activate the development standards contained within the plan WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act authorizes the preparation of subarea plans; and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has adopted a comprehensive plan under the provisions of Chapter 36.70A RCW that includes policies for the creation of subarea plans, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36 70A 130(2)(a)(i), the City may amend the Comprehensive Plan more frequently than once per year under certain circumstances, including the initial adoption of a subarea plan, and WHEREAS, the City passed Ordinance No.5062 designating the SKIA Manufacturing/Industrial Center (MIC) in the Comprehensive Plan as part of the 2008 docket of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, SKIA is designated as one of eight Manufactunng/Industnal Centers in the Puget Sound Regional Council's (PSRC) Vision 2040 regional growth strategy; and WHEREAS, SKIA will retain a different urban form than Bremerton's current regional or district centers, particularly due to the expected industrial development to occur in the next 20 years, and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan encourages a subarea plan to be prepared for designated centers, which must involve the community in its preparation, be consistent with Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, and contain development standards and design guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City has undertaken an extensive public participation process by conducting advisory group meetings, workshops, and public open houses between November 2010 and June 2012 to discuss the SKIA Subarea Plan, gather public input, and guide the development of the Plan; and WHEREAS, the draft SKIA Subarea Plan was made available for public review and comment on March 29, 2012, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 the Washington State Department of Commerce was provided the 60 -day notification on March 29, 2012 of amendments to the 1 SKU Subarea Plan Comprehensive Plan and development regulations as a result of the Subarea Plan adoption and the submittal was assigned "Material ID # 17953 ", and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a workshop to discuss the proposed Subarea Plan and development regulations at its regular meeting on April 17, 2012; and WHEREAS, a legal advertisement was placed in the Kitsap Sun on June 9, 2012 notifying the public of the opportunity to provide testimony at the Planning Commission public heanng; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2012 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed SKIA Subarea Plan and development regulations, considered public comment, and made a recommendation of approval for the City Council's consideration, and WHEREAS, on September 29, 2010 a Determination of Significance and Scope of Work for the SKIA Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) notice was issued to comply with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and WHEREAS, on June 9, 2011 a Draft EIS was issued and comments were accepted through July 21, 2011, and WHEREAS, after consideration of public comment a Final EIS was issued on March 29, 2012, and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan amendment to include the SKIA Subarea Plan meets the decision criteria outlined in BMC 20 10 080(b)(1) through (5) It is consistent with the Growth Management Act, it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan vision for the site and other goals and policies of the City, the Plan is compatible with the current development patterns, the Plan does not adversely affect the City's ability to provide urban services at the planned level of service, and bears a reasonable relationship to benefitting the public health, safety and welfare, and WHEREAS, the Zoning Code amendment to activate the development standards contained within the SKIA Subarea Plan meets the decision criteria outlined in BMC 20.18.020 (d), as the Plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not conflict with other City, state and federal codes, regulations and ordinances; and WHEREAS, a legal advertisement was placed in the Kitsap Sun on July 21, 2012 notifying the public of the opportunity to provide testimony at the City Council public hearing; and WHEREAS, on August 1, 2012 the City Council conducted a public hearing so that the public had further opportunity to comment on the Subarea Plan and development regulations; NOW THEREFORE, 2 SKU Subarea Plan THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS• SECTION 1. The City Council accepts and adopts the Findings and Conclusions of the Planning Commission as presented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full herein. SECTION Z. The Comprehensive Plan is amended by the addition of the SKIA Subarea Plan as presented in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full herein SECTION 3. Section 20 80 080 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Subarea Plans" is hereby amended to read as follows. 20.80.080 SUBAREA PLANS. The following are subarea planning areas where subarea plans and unique development regulations may be created for each. (a) Bay Vista Subarea Plan (adopted by Ordinance No. 5077); (b) East Park Subarea Plan (adopted by Ordinance No. 4962); (c) Wheaton - Riddell Subarea Plan (adopted by Ordinance No. 5025); (d) Downtown Regional Center Subarea Plan (adopted by Ordinance No. 5034), (e) Manette Subarea Plan (adopted by Ordinance No 5082), (f) Harrison Employment Center, (g) Port Blakely Employment Center; (h) SKIA Subarea Plan (adopted by Ordinance No ). The subarea planning areas listed above having adopted subarea plans are identified with the corresponding adopting ordinance number Tins ordinance will contain the unique regulations and standards that guide development for that subarea planning area. Subsequent amendment to adopted subarea plans need not be identified in this section by the amending ordinance number SECTION 4. Severabihty If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION S. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council the day of , 2012 JIM MCDONALD, Council President 3 SKIA Subarea Plan Approved this day of 9 2012 PATTY LENT, Mayor ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk ROGER A LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of , 2012 EFFECTIVE the day of , 2012 ORDINANCE NO. R \Legal\Legal \Ordinances \Community Development\SKIA Subarea Plan doc 4 SKIA Subarea Plan EXHIBIT FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION Summary — Proposal to include the South Kitsap industrial Area (SKIA) Subarea Plan in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code by amendment The Zoning Code will add reference in BMC 20.80.080 to activate the SKIA Subarea Plan as development regulations for the South Kitsap Industrial Area. I. FINDINGS OF FACT 1.0 Project Description The SKIA Subarea covers an approximately 3,700 acre area in the southwestern portion of the City of Bremerton. The Subarea Plan includes two primary components 1) an amendment to the 2004 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and to the Zoning Code, BMC Title 20, adding the SKIA Subarea Plan to both and, 2) development regulations for SKIA that will function as zoning upon Plan adoption. The SKIA Manufacturing/Industrial Center (MIC) was designated in the City's Comprehensive Plan in the 2008 amendment of the Comprehensive Plan, per Ordinance 5062. SKIA is also designated as one of eight Manufacturing/Industrial Centers in the PSRC Vision 2040 regional growth strategy. SKIA will retain a different urban form than Bremerton's current regional or district centers, particularly due to the expected industrial development to occur in the next 20 years. Following SKIA annexations, the Industrial Zoning requirements were applied to the entire area as an interim 'stopgap' zoning scenario. In 2010 the City obtained a grant from the EPA under its "Climate Showcase Communities" program, which funded work on a SKIA Subarea Plan to ensure that future development of the subarea is coordinated, well- designed, and meets sustainable development goals, while still meeting the goals of the MIC to accommodate intensive manufacturing and industrial development. The SKIA Subarea Plan is a detailed planning document that fits within the framework of the Comprehensive Plan The Subarea Plan fits within the growth projections of the Comprehensive Plan and implements its °Centers" concept. 2.0 Procedural History A public participation process for the SKIA Subarea Plan has been ongoing since the Fall of 2010. The Subarea Plan includes documentation of the public participation process (parts of Section A and Section B). Three public open houses and a wide range of stakeholder meetings were held over the course of the planning process. Additionally the Plan was presented and discussed at a Planning Commission Workshop on April 17, 2012. Extensive community input is integrated throughout the plan, meeting and exceeding requirements 1 of 7 - EXHIBITA A summary of meetings, workshops, and open houses held is listed below Technical Working Group (TWG) Meetings The TWG is an advisory group comprising senior technical staff from each of the regional jurisdictions, Port of Bremerton, SKIA property owners, Suquamish Tnbe, Port Gamble /S'Klallam Tribe, South Kitsap Economic Development Alliance, Sustainable Bremerton, Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, Hood Canal Coordinating Council, and the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard /Naval Base Kdsap. 2.1 November 9, 2010 2.2 April 28, 2011 Executive Committee (EC) Meetings The EC comprises elected and appointed officials from the following organizations Bremerton City Council, Bremerton Planning Commission, Port of Bremerton Port Commission, Kitsap County, Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Suquamish Tribal Council, Port Orchard City Council, and Naval Base Kitsap. 2.3 December 9, 2010 2.4 May 5, 2011 Joint TWG and EC Meetings 2.6 June 16, 2011 2.6 July 25, 2011 2.7 March 28, 2012 2.8 April 10, 2012 (Developer's Forum) Public Open Houses 2.9 October 10, 2010 2.10 June 16, 2011 2.11 May 7, 2012 Planning Commission 2.12 Public Workshop— August 17, 2010 (Overview of grant and process) 2.13 Public Workshop —Apnl 17, 2012 (Overview of Draft Subarea Plan) 2.14 Planning Commission Public Hearing —June 19, 2012 Notice Notice for all open houses, workshops and hearings was publicized widely in a range of outlets including advertisement in the Kitsap Sun, City of Bremerton website and direct mailings. Direct mailing to persons with property in proximity to or within the SKIA Subarea was the primary method for notification of public meetings. A record of contacts for all persons participating in any of the meetings was maintained. 2 of 7 EXHIBIT A 3.0 Public Comment at Public Hearing Numerous individuals, groups, and agencies provided comments at public workshops, community meetings, and via comment cards and letters. Comments received were considered and used to develop the draft plan that is prepared for Planning Commission Review A general summary of public participation is found in Section A of the SKIA Subarea Plan. Individuals providing verbal testimony at the Planning Commission Public Hearing are listed below: 3.1 Fred Salisbury, Port of Bremerton, 8850 S.W. State Hwy 3, Bremerton 3.2 Roger Zabinski, Port of Bremerton, 8850 S W. State Hwy 3, Bremerton 3.3 Stan Palmer, Stan Palmer Construction, 5107 State Hwy 3 SW, Bremerton 3.4 Ryan Sandstrom, Alpine Evergreen, 7124 State Hwy 3 SW, Bremerton 4.0 SEPA Determination, Environmental Review, and Agency Notification 4.1 SEPA Adoption of development regulations and amendments to the Comprehensive Plan require evaluation of environment impacts through the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process. The City issued a SEPA Determination of Significance (DS) on the Plan on September 29, 2010. The Subarea Plan is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment due to the threshold of development expected to occur. The DS requires statutory notice, review and appeal periods, which the City completed The determination that this proposal is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment resulted in the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) as outlined below. 4.2 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the SKIA Subarea Plan evaluates the probable significant environmental impacts that could occur as a result of development activities within SKIA under a range of EIS Alternatives. Direct, indirect and cumulative impacts associated with the range of alternatives were assessed. Impacts associated with the alternatives were analyzed and appropriate mitigation measures to address significant adverse impacts were identified. The EIS provides decision- makers with relevant information to evaluate the Proposed Action The EIS addresses the probable significant adverse environmental impacts of two action alternatives and one no- action alternative identified in the Subarea planning process. The EIS is also intended to fulfill SEPA requirements for Planned Action environmental review. According to SEPA, a "Planned Action" is a designation for a project or elements of a project that shifts environmental review from the time a permit application is made to an earlier phase in the process (WAC 197 -11 -164). The planned action analysis applies to the entire study area and addresses potential impacts and mitigating measures for each of the identified alternatives. 3 of 7 EXHIBIT A Because future site - specific proposals that qualify under the planned action ordinance would not be subject to future SEPA threshold determinations or public comment on environmental impacts, interested individuals and agencies were given the opportunity to provide comment during the public comment periods during the planned action EIS process. The Draft EIS was issued on June 9, 2011 and the Final EIS was issued on March 29, 2012. The Draft EIS and the Final EIS are intended to be used in conjunction with one another. 4.3 60-day State Agency Review Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations also require a 60 day State Agency Review and Comment Period The document was forwarded to State agencies, commencing the review period, on March 29, 2012. There were no comments received from State agencies during the review period, which closed on May 29, 2012. 5.0 Comprehensive Plan Consistency Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall meet the decision criteria outlined in BMC 20.10 The Planning Commission may recommend, and the City Council may adopt or adopt with modifications, an amendment to the comprehensive plan if the criteria outlined below are met. The proposal is to add the SKIA Subarea Plan to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plans as an amendment, providing more specific and detailed planning for the area. 5.1 BMC 20.10.080(a) allows amendments to the Comprehensive Plan if there is an obvious technical error. Not applicable to this project 5.2 BMC 20.10.080(b) allows amendments to the Comprehensive Plan if the following criteria have been met. 5.2 (1) The amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act (GMA): This amendment is consistent with the GMA by meeting the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan which was created to achieve the goals of the GMA. Specifically, the Subarea Plan meets the Economic Development goal by supporting existing industries, recruiting new industrial sectors, and emphasizing the development of a "clean -tech" sector. Through the various Low4mpact Development (UD) measures and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reducing measures outlined in the standards (Section C), guidelines (Section D), and the EIS, the Subarea Plan meets the Environment goal by striving to enhance the quality of the local environment. Furthermore, through an aggressive public outreach component, which focused on both public involvement as well as involvement of staff at regional jurisdictions and 4of7 EXHIBIT A agencies, the Subarea Plan meets the Citizen Participation and Regional Coordination goal of the GMA The GMA encourages the adoption of subarea plans, recognizing that this may occur outside of the annual amendment bmeframe, as is the case with the SKIA Subarea Plan. 5.2 (2) The amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan or other goals or policies of the City. The SKIA Subarea Plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation of the SKIA Subarea as a Manufacturing/industrial Center. The Manufacturing/lndustnal Center designation calls for intensive, concentrated manufacturing and industrial land uses that cannot be easily mixed with other activities. Furthermore, Manufacturing/lndustrial Centers are intended to accommodate a significant amount of regional employment, and will have a different urban form and purpose than the rest of the City's centers. The Subarea Plan achieves this vision through the Goals and Strategies (Section A), the Zoning and Development Standards (Section C), and the Design Guidelines (Section D) which promote compact industrial and commercial development and job creation that support long -term economic vitality. The Subarea Plan also includes specific goals and strategies that meet the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Subarea Plan encourages environmentally responsible development and economic development, which are goals also found in the Comprehensive Plan. 5.2 (3) If the amendment was reviewed but not adopted as a part of a previous proposal, circumstances related to the proposed amendment have significantly changed, or the needs of the City have changed, which support an amendment, This amendment supplements and implements the Comprehensive Plan. It is based on the direction of the Comprehensive Plan to develop specific area plans for the SKIA Manufacturing /Industrial Center 5.2 (4) The amendment is compatible with existing or planned land uses and the surrounding development pattern, The SKIA Subarea Plan is compatible with the adopted Manufacturing/Industrial Center land use and the surrounding development pattern. Industrial uses currently are predominant in the Subarea and through the Subarea Plan, industrial uses are intended to remain the predominating use in the long term. 5.2 (5) The amendment will not adversely affect the City's ability to provide urban services at the planned level of service and bears a reasonable relationship to benefiting the public health, safety and welfare 5 of 7 EXHIBIT The SKIA Subarea Plan will not adversely affect the City's ability to provide urban services at the planned level of service. The Environmental Impact Statement addresses the City's ability to provide urban services at the planned level of service. Additionally, the GMA compliant Capital Facilities Plan (Section E) outlines the provision of urban services, including transportation, water, sewer, and stormwater facilities The purpose of the CFP for SKIA is to provide adequate public facilities consistent with the development plan of the SKIA Subarea Plan. Careful planning and sound fiscal policies will provide the needed facilities that achieve and maintain the City of Bremerton's standards for level of service concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of development. The amendment will benefit the public health, safety and welfare by achieving numerous City goals and policies related to environmental stewardship, while ensuring that intense industrial development occurs where it is most suited 6.0 Amendment to the Zoning Code An amendment to the Zoning Code, BMC 20.80.080 Master Development, is proposed to accompany adoption of the SKiA Subarea Plan. This amendment adds a reference to the Ordinance adopting the Subarea Plan, thereby activating the development standards contained in the Plan as the zoning for the SKIA Subarea. Zoning code text amendments shall meet the decision criteria outlined in BMC 20.18 020 (d) The Planning Commission may recommend, and the City Council may adopt or adopt with modifications, an amendment to the zoning code text if the criteria outlined below are met. 6.1(1) 20.18.020(d)(2) allows amendments to the Zoning Code if it is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan See discussion in 5.2 above for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and Section A of the Subarea Plan. The SKIA Subarea Plan is fully consistent with the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shows the SKIA Subarea as a Manufactunng /Industrial Center, which is described on page LU -23a of the amended Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan as ...areas with existing or expected intensive, concentrated manufacturing and industrial land uses that cannot be easily mixed with other activities. Manufacturingfindustnal Centers are intended to accommodate a significant amount of regional employment, and will have a different urban form and purpose than the rest of the City's centers. They can be characterized as areas of large contiguous blocks of land served by the region's major transportation infrastructure, including such items as roads, rail, and port facilities. Protecting these centers from incompatible uses, as well as providing them with adequate public facilities and services will riequire deliberate and careful planning. 6of7 EXHIBIT The SKIA Subarea Plan is consistent with this vision for the Manufacturing /Industrial Center and achieves it through the Goals and Strategies (Section A) and the Zoning and Development Standards (Section C). 6.2(2) 20.18.020(d)(2) allows amendments to the Zoning Code if it does not conflict with other City, state and federal codes, regulations and ordinances. The SKIA Subarea plan does not conflict with any other regulations. 11. CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings above, the Planning Commission concludes that the SKIA Subarea Plan has met the requirements for 1) amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and 2) text amendments to the zoning code as detailed in BMC 20.80. Therefore the Commission recommends the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to include the SKIA Subarea Plan and an amendment to the zoning code text in BMC 20.80 to include the Ordinance number of the SKIA Subarea Plan. Respectfully submitted by: Approved by: drea L r, AICP G Jose, it ecub cretary Planning Commission 7 of 7 i PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED POST- PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING _ tj SKIA Subarea Plan Comment Table for comments received after Planning Commission Public Hearing on June, 19, 2012 Comment Commenter Comment Summary Staff Response Letter # 1 Kitsap County The number of expected jobs in SKIA is The Planned Action EIS preferred identified as 6,500, per the Preferred Alternative alternative identifies 6,500 jobs This This is a decrease from the 9,350 projected as number is only for purposes of the planned the basis for the UGA's designation in 2003 action designation, and does not limit the amount of employment in the subarea, and there is ample capacity to allow for 10,000 jobs in the subarea In Section A of the subarea plan, under Economic Development Goals page A -14 it clearly describes a desired outcome of progress of 10,000 jobs, with the ultimate long -term goal of 20,000 employees, as established by the PSRC MIC designation When the planned action ordinance reaches the employment and development limit, the City has the option of conducting additional SEPA review to allow additional growth through the Planned Action Ordinance 1 Kitsap County SKIA was designated based on a countywide This Mixed Employment (ME) designation analysis of employment needs, and the jobs allows for commercial, office and light projected for SKIA were industrial /manufacturing industrial uses These uses are allowed in focused, and the area designated Mixed the City's current zoning designation for Employment allows other uses SKIA as "Industrial," the zoning that became effective upon annexation Commercial uses are more broadly identified in the ME zone in order to respond to and serve additional demand for services associated with more intensive industrial development in SKIA Printed July 11, 2012 Page 1 of 3 1 Kitsap County The code provisions for the Mixed Employment The City has the prerogative to structure its area may not provide for the retail services and code in order to meet its goals In this case, high -tech manufacturing mix the City has clearly established in the intent of providing flexibility and a mix of uses in this area 1 Kitsap County Transportation analysis focused on intersections Comment is correct The EIS transportation of County roads with SR 3 or SR 16 analysis used existing background traffic and projected trip generation and distribution to determine where the transportation system would be most impacted Based on this information, the busiest and most impacted locations were intersections rather than roadway segments Please see also the response to the comment on intersection LOS, below 1 Kitsap County, Analysis focuses on intersection LOS and no Intersection LOS analysis was used as a jurisdictions have LOS standards for conservative measure of delay as this intersections method is generally most sensitive to impacts resulting from increases in vehicle trips In general, the segment LOS methods cited in the comment are simplified approaches that seek to measure the same type of traffic congestion that is measured by intersection LOS, and therefore the two methodologies (intersection and segment) are measuring the same thing The intersection LOS method of analysis does not require any change to current city or county mitigation and monitoring practices and these agencies can continue to use their standard approach to monitoring traffic congestion (This comment and response was also included in the Final EIS Printed July 11, 2012 Page 2 of 3 1 Kitsap County Belfair Bypass will have no impact on SR 3 in Staff concurs that Belfair Bypass does not Kitsap County help SR 3 in Kitsap County Improvements to SR 3 in Kitsap County are discussed and identified as a future state project in the EIS and Subarea Plan Please see the response to the comment on infeasible mitigation, below 1 Kitsap County Stating that improvements are infeasible does The comment appears to be referring to text not relieve the proponent from mitigating the in the Draft EIS Chapter 1 Summary, which impact was identifying mitigation options for specific intersections with SR 3, and not the Subarea Plan text The statement of "infeasible" was recognition that the state has not identified plans to address the impacts described in the EIS (and that neither the City of Bremerton nor a private applicant has the ability or the financial capacity to assume responsibility for improvements to state facilities) The draft planned action ordinance establishes that the City and WSDOT should develop a memorandum of understanding to determine how impacts to state facilities will be addressed The MOU provides a vehicle to address the impacts identified in the Draft EIS and corresponding state projects identified in the Subarea Plan CFP Printed July 11, 2012 Page 3 of 3 Comment #1 KITSAP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FJ Y fl Efficient, accessible and effective county services June 13, 2012 Robert Gelder DISTRICT 1 Mayor Patty Lent Charlotte Garrido City of Bremerton DISTRICT 2 345 6th Street, Suite 600 Josh Brown Bremerton, WA 98337 DISTRICT 3 Dear Mayor Lent: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) Sub - Area Plan being prepared by the City of Bremerton. This Plan will help guide SKIA as it grows into a key employment center for Kitsap County and provides opportunities for high -tech jobs at family wages On behalf of Kitsap County, I offer the following comments regarding the Draft Plan and Preferred Alternative: 7 a The Preferred Alternative reduces the number of expected fobs in SKIA to 6,500 (down from the 9,350 projected as the basis for the LIGA's designation in 2003). Since 2003, the SKIA area was designated a regional growth center for employment by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). The PSRC sets a goal of 10,000 jobs for such a center. PSRC input regarding the substantially reduced employment projection should be documented prior to a final decision by the City Council. A growth center designation -- and access to additional federal funds -- is key to the successful development of the SKIA area, and any action that may affect it should be justified in advance. • The SKIA area was designated based upon a countywide analysis of employment needs through 2012 and recently extended through 2025. As SKIA was fully - Industrial /manufacturing focused, those were the employment sectors projected for this area. Yet the Preferred Alternative proposes to redesignate several hundred acres of the developable land from full manufacturing to mixed employment. This change appears to allow for retail and service employee sectors never expected to occupy SKIA. Rather, these jobs were allocated to other portions of the cities and county based upon the countywide analysis. Neither the Draft Plan nor the HIS Include analysis to support the increased need for retail and service land and this large redesignation. Without analysis, other jurisdictions cannot determine whether this new land supply impacts their areas already designated for such uses. • The code provisions for the mixed - employment area may not provide for the retail services and high -tech manufacturing mix. It appears open to varied uses without `r j L t Jk i 614 Division Street, MS-4 - Port Orchard, Washington 98366 -4676 - (360) 337 -7146 - FAX (360) 337 -4632 From Olalla (253) 851 -4147 - Bainbridge Island (206) 842 -2061 www.kdsaoaov.com Comment #1 prescribing requirements for a mix of uses would be required. Additional limits seem necessary to ensure future development meets the intent for this area. I have also attached a comment letter from the Department of Public Works regarding specific elements of the Plan and FEIS. The issues generally relate to transportation methodology and consistency between jurisdictions. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment. This Plan will be an important blueprint for SKIA's future and we look forward to opportunities to collaborate further as the plan moves toward adoption. Sincerely, Charlotte Garrido Commissioner Attachment. Public Works letter cc: Department of Community Development Department of Public Works Special Projects Comment #1 Kitsap County Department of Public Works is 614 Division Street (MS -26), Port Orchard, WA 98366 -4699 R W Casteel, P E, Director ►rr June 18"', 2012 To: Mayor Patty Lent From: Greg Cioc, Kdsap County Transportation Planning Manager CC: Charlotte Garrido, Commissioner District 2 Randy Casteel PE, Director Kitsap County Public Works Jon Brand, Kitsap County Engineer Enc Baker, Special Projects Manager Re: South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) Su -Area Plan c Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft SKIA Sub -area Plan, Transportation section pages 1 -19 to 1 -27 There is no analysis of impacts to any county roads, only intersections of county roads with SR3 or SR16 As stated in previous comments on the Draft 2011 Ian, b . p p no jurisdictions in Kitsap County have set Level of Service Standards for intersections Much of the analysis in this plan focuses on intersection LOS Intersection LOS should be analyzed and adopted by the City of Bremerton and Kitsap County in the future in support of the SKIA Plan In our opinion, the Belfair By -pass may relieve traffic in the Belfair community, but will have no impact on SR3 in Kitsap County Those travelling to the shipyard or points north that might use the by -pass will still merge onto SR3 at the Kitsap /Mason border Those travelling south to Tacoma already have the ability to turn onto Lake Flora Road and avoid SR3 without using the by -pass Alternatives 2 and 3 In the Sub -area plan, it is stated on page 1 -21 "however, since WSDOT has not considered or planned for these alternative improvements, they are considered infeasible" and page 1 -22 "However, these improvements are not in any WSDOT plans and could lead to additional right - of -way, environmental and cost impacts and are considered infeasible" Stating that improvements are considered infeasible does not relieve the proponent from mitigating the transportation need Roads/Engineering 360 - 337 -5777 . Utilities Informabon 360 -337 -7127 . FAX 360 - 337 -4867 • Kdsap 1 360 -337 -5777 Toll free 1- 800 - 825 -4940 or from Olalla 253 -851 -4147 — printed on recycled paper — AGENDA BILL ,x r CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ■• eeeeeeeeeeereeeeeeeerrreeeeerereeeeerrreeeeeeeerrrrerrreeererrrrrreeeeeerrrreeeeerree� SUBJECT: Public hearing on an ordinance Study Session Date July 11, 2012 amending BMC Chapter 20 04, State COUNCIL MEETING Date July 18, 2012 Environmental Policy Act Department DCD Presenter Andrea L Spencer Phone 360 473 5283 SUMMARY: The Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) Chapter 20 04, contains provisions for the City's implementation of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requirements The City's regulations were drafted primarily in 1984, and since that time the state legislature has made modifications to SEPA Staff recommends that Council update the references in the BMC to include new provisions contained in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) related to SEPA The proposed ordinance contains two updates to the SEPA rules 1) Reference is added to BMC 20 04 010 Statutory Authority to include reference to the city's comprehensive plan, capital facilities plans, and municipal code These references are important as these policies and regulations and their associated environmental review documents are often used during the mitigation process for development projects 2) Add a new Section 20 04 205 called "Planned Action " This incorporates the provisions contained within the WAC 197 -11 164, 197 -11 -168, & 197 -11 -17 ATTACHMENTS: 1) Proposed Ordinance II) Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Excerpts being adopted by reference FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) None APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY 4t FINANCE DIRECTOR MAYOR P RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Ordinance No amending Chapter 20 04 BMC State Environmental Policy Act to include rovisions for Planned Action environmental review and clarify the statutory p Y authority STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing COUNCIL PRESIDENT COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 11/02/2011 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 2004 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "State Environmental Policy Act" to update the section relating to statutory authority for SEPA and to add provisions for Planned Action environmental review WHEREAS, the current provisions of Chapter 20 04, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) were primarily drafted in 1984, and WHEREAS, the Chapter 20 04 010 BMC requires minor modification to clarify the statutory authority the City uses to perform environmental review, and WHEREAS, in 1997 amendments to the SEPA rules were enacted by the State Legislature allowing jurisdictions to prepare environmental impact statements for planned actions such as those projects identified in a subarea plan, and WHEREAS, the current provisions of Chapter 20 04 BMC do not contain provisions for Planned Action environmental review, and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to incorporate changes to the City's SEPA regulations to allow flexibility to implement the beneficial planned action tool, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS. SECTION 1. Section 20 04 010 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Statutory Authority" is hereby amended to read as follows 20.04.010 STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The City adopts the ordinance codified in this chapter under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43 21C 120, and the SEPA Rules, WAC 197 -11 -904 This chapter contains the City's SEPA procedures and policies. The SEPA Rules, Chapter 197 -11 WAC, must be used in conjunction with this chapter The City also designates and adopts by reference the following, policies and regulations as the basis for the Crty's exercise of authonty pursuant to this chapter Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Comprehensive Plans and the Bremerton Municipal Code including but not limited to Title 6 (Health and Samtation), Title 11 (Streets and Rights -of -Way) Title 15 (Municipal Utilities) Title 17 Buildings and Construction), and Title 20 Land Use) 1 SEPA Planned Action SECTION 2. A new section, Section 20 04 205, entitled " Planned Actions " is hereby added to Chapter 20 04 of the Bremerton Municipal Code to read as follows- 20.04.205 PLANNED ACTIONS The Ci _ adopts by reference and codifies in this chapter the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) rules WAC 197 -11 -164 WAC 197 -11 -168 and WAC 197 -11 -172 that establish the definitions, procedures, and project review requirements for Planned Actions SECTION 3. Severabdq If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect SECTION 4. _Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law PASSED by the City Council the day of 9 2012 JIM McDONALD, Council President Approved this day of 3 2012 PATTY LENT, Mayor ATTEST. APPROVED AS TO FORM SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of , 2012 EFFECTIVE the day of , 2012 ORDINANCE NO R \Legal\Legal \Ordinances \Community Development \SEPA Code Change Planned Action doc 2 SEPA Planned Action Attachment II — WAC References WAC 197 -11 -164 Planned actions -- Definition and criteria. (1) Under RCW 43.21C.031, GMA counties /cities may designate a planned action A planned action means one or more types of project action that. (a) Are designated planned actions by an ordinance or resolution adopted by a GMA county /city, (b) Have had the significant environmental impacts adequately addressed in an EIS prepared in conjunction with (i) A comprehensive plan or subarea plan adopted under chapter 36 70A RCW, or (ii) A fully contained community, a master planned resort, a master planned development, or a phased project, (c) Are subsequent or implementing projects for the proposals listed in (b) of this subsection; (d) Are located within an urban growth area, as defined in RCW 36 70A 030, or are located within a master planned resort, (e) Are not essential public facilities, as defined in RCW 36.70A 200, and (f) Are consistent with a comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36 70A RCW (2) A GMA county /city shall limit planned actions to certain types of development or to specific geographical areas that are less extensive than the jurisdictional boundaries of the GMA county /city. (3) A GMA county /city may limit a planned action to a time period identified in the EIS or the designating ordinance or resolution adopted under WAC 197 -11 -168 WAC 197 -11 -168 Ordinances or resolutions designating planned actions -- Procedures for adoption. (1) If a GMA county /city chooses to designate a planned action, the planned action must be designated by ordinance or resolution Public notice and opportunity for public comment shall be provided as part of the agency's process for adopting the ordinance or resolution (2) The ordinance or resolution- (a) Shall describe the type(s) of project action being designated as a planned action, (b) Shall describe how the planned action meets the criteria in WAC 197 -11 -164 (including specific reference to the EIS that addresses any significant environmental impacts of the planned action), (c) Shall include a finding that the environmental impacts of the planned action have been identified and adequately addressed in the EIS, subject to protect review under WAC 197 -11 -172, and (d) Should identify any specific mitigation measures other than applicable development regulations that must be applied to a project for it to qualify as the planned action. (3) If the GMA county /city has not limited the planned action to a specific time period identified in the EIS, it may do so in the ordinance or resolution designating the planned action. (4) The GMA county /city is encouraged to provide a periodic review and update procedure for the planned action to monitor implementation and consider changes as warranted. i Attachment II — WAC References WAC 197 -11 -172 Planned actions -- Project review. (1) Review of a project proposed as a planned action is intended to be simpler and more focused than for other protects. A project proposed as a planned action must qualify as the planned action designated in the planned action ordinance or resolution, and must meet the statutory criteria for a planned action in RCW 43.21C 031 Planned action project review shall include: (a) Verification that the project meets the description in, and will implement any applicable conditions or mitigation measures identified in, the designating ordinance or resolution; and (b) Verification that the probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the protect have been adequately addressed in the EIS prepared under WAC 197 -11 -164 (1)(b) through review of an environmental checklist or other project review form as specified in WAC 197 -11 -315, filed with the project application (2)(a) If the project meets the requirements of subsection (1) of this section, the project shall qualify as the planned action designated by the GMA county /city, and a project threshold determination or EIS is not required Nothing in this section limits a GMA county /city from using this chapter or other applicable law to place conditions on the protect in order to mitigate nonsignificant impacts through the normal local project review and permitting process (b) If the project does not meet the requirements of subsection (1) of this section, the project is not a planned action and a threshold determination is required In conducting the additional environmental review under this chapter, the lead agency may use information in existing environmental documents, including the EIS used to designate the planned action (refer to WAC 197 -11 -330 (2)(a) and 197 -11 -600 through 197 -11 -635). If an EIS or SEIS is prepared on the proposed project, its scope is limited to those probable significant adverse environmental impacts that were not adequately addressed in the EIS used to designate the planned action. (3) Public notice for protects that qualify as planned actions shall be tied to the underlying permit If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a planned action If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required However, the GMA county /city is encouraged to provide some form of public notice as deemed appropriate AGENDA BILL u CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL fffff••f•11111f ■ ■ff/ fffff / fffff / fff /f / ■■ fffff ■ ■f fff fffff /• / ■ff /fffff ■•fff ■ ■f ■ ■ ■ / / ■ff /fff SUBJECT: Public heanng on a Planned Study Session Date July 11 & 25, 2012 Action Ordinance for the South Kitsap COUNCIL MEETING Date August 1, 2012 Industnal Area (SKIA) Department DCD Presenter Doug McIntyre Phone 360 473 5845 SUMMARY: The action before the Council is to conduct a public hearing and consider public testimony on the Planned Action Ordinance for the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) Subarea According to SEPA, a "Planned Action" is a designation for a project or elements of a project that shifts environmental review from the time a permit application is made to an earlier phase in the process The planned action analysis applies to the entire study area and addresses potential impacts and mitigating measures for each of the identified alternatives ATTACHMENTS: 1) Proposed Planned Action Ordinance Exhibit A) Subarea Plan map Exhibit B) Mitigation measures 11) User's Guide, Final EIS, Draft EIS, Appendix to Draft EIS (in notebook) FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) None APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR MAYOR RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Ordinance No to adopt the Planned Action Ordinance for the South Kitsap Industnal Area (SKIA) STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing COUNCIL PRESIDENT COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action Form Updated 11/02/2011 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, establishing a Planned Action for the South Krtsap Industrial Area (SKIA), pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act WHEREAS, the State Environmental policy Act ( "SEPA ") and implementing rules provide for the integration of environmental review with land use planning and project review through designation of "Planned Actions" by jurisdictions planning under the Growth Management Act ( "GMA "), and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA, and WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations permitting designation of Planned Actions, and WHEREAS, the Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2040 designates SKIA as a regional Manufacturing/Industrial Center (MIC), which is expected to accommodate significant employment growth at higher densities; and WHEREAS, the City has received a Climate Showcase Communities grant from the U S Environmental Protection Agency to develop a sub -area plan that supports sustainability, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, low impact development stormwater and wastewater recycling, and WHEREAS, the City has prepared a sub -area plan and development regulations for the SKIA Sub -area, and WHEREAS, designation of a Planned Action expedites the permitting process for subsequent, implementing projects whose impacts have been previously addressed in a Planned Action environmental impact statement ( "EIS "), and thereby encourages desired growth and economic development, and WHEREAS, the SKIA Sub -area Planned Action EIS identifies impacts and mitigation measures associated with planned development in the sub -area, and WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations which will help protect the environment, and is adopting zoning regulations specific to the sub -area which will guide the amount, location, form, and quality of desired development, and WHEREAS, the SKIA Sub -area is deemed to be appropriate for designation of a Planned Action; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS 1 SKIA Planned Action Ordinance SECTION] Recitals The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference SECTION 2 . Purpose The City Council declares that the purpose of this ordinance is to A Combine analysis of environmental impacts with the City's development of plans and regulations; B Designate the SKIA Sub -area as a Planned Action for purposes of environmental review and permitting of subsequent, implementing projects pursuant to SEPA, RCW 43 21C 031, C Determine that the EIS prepared for the sub -area plan meets the requirements of a Planned Action EIS pursuant to SEPA, D Establish criteria and procedures, consistent with state law, that will determine whether subsequent, implementing projects qualify as Planned Actions, E Provide the public with information about Planned Actions and how the City will process applications for implementing projects, F Streamline and expedite the land use review and approval process for qualifying projects by relying on the EIS completed for the Planned Action, and G Apply the City's development regulations together with the mitigation measures described in the Planned Action EIS and this Ordinance to address the impacts of future development contemplated by the Planned Action. SECTION 3 . Findings. The City Council finds as follows A The City is subject to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, RCW 36 70A, and is located within an Urban Growth Area, B The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA, and is amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate a sub -area element specific to the SKIA Sub- area, C The City is adopting development regulations concurrent with the SKIA Sub -area Plan to implement said Plan, including this ordinance, D The City has prepared an EIS for the SKIA Sub -area ( "Planned Action EIS ") and finds that this EIS adequately addresses the probable significant environmental impacts associated with the type and amount of development planned to occur in the designated Planned Action area, E The mitigation measures identified in the Planned Action EIS and attached to this ordinance as Exhibit B, incorporated herein by reference, together with adopted City development regulations, will adequately mitigate significant impacts from development within the Planned Action area, F The subarea plan and Planned Action EIS identify the location, type and amount of development that is contemplated by the Planned Action; G Future projects that are implemented consistent with the Planned Action will protect the environment, benefit the public and enhance economic development, H The City has provided numerous opportunities for meaningful public involvement in the proposed Planned Action, including a community meeting prior to publication of notice for the planned action ordinance, has considered all comments received, and, as appropriate, has modified the proposal or mitigation measures in response to comments, 2 SKIA Planned Action Ordinance I The SKIA Sub -area Plan is not for an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36 70A.200(1), and any future projects which meet the definition of an essential public facility will not qualify as Planned Actions unless they are accessory to or part of a project that otherwise qualifies as a planned action, J The Planned Action applies to a defined area that is smaller than the overall City boundaries, and K Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed Planned Action, with implementation of mitigation measures identified in the EIS SECTION 4 Procedures and Criteria for Evaluating and Determininz Protects as Planned Actions A Planned Action Area The Planned Action designation shall apply to the area shown in Exhibit A, incorporated herein by reference B Environmental Document A Planned Action determination for a site - specific implementing project application shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the Draft EIS issued by the City on June 9, 2011 and the Final EIS published on March 29, 2012 The Draft EIS and Final EIS shall comprise the Planned Action EIS The mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B are based upon the findings of the Planned Action EIS and shall, along with adopted City regulations, provide the framework that the City will use to impose appropriate conditions on qualifying Planned Action projects C Planned Action Desianated Land uses and activities described in the Planned Action EIS, subject to the thresholds described in subsection 4 D and the mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B, are designated Planned Actions or Planned Action Projects pursuant to RCW 43 21C 031 A development application for a site - specific Planned Action project located within the SKIA Planned Action Area shall be designated as a Planned Action if it meets the criteria set forth in subsection 4 D of this ordinance and applicable laws, codes, development regulations and standards of the City D Planned Action Qualifications The following thresholds shall be used to determine if a site - specific development proposed within the SKIA Planned Action Area is contemplated by the Planned Action and has had its environmental impacts evaluated in the Planned Action EIS (1) Land Use The following general categories /types of land uses, which are permitted in zoning districts applicable to the SKIA Planned Action Area, and subject to any limitations in size contained in the applicable zoning districts, are considered Planned Actions Anticipated land uses are further identified below (a) Industrial and manufacturing uses, (b) Office uses, including but not limited to research and development, compatible with and supporting industrial activities, (c) Retail and service uses compatible with and supporting industrial activities, (d) Utilities and capital facilities Individual land uses considered to be Planned Actions shall include those uses specifically listed in development regulations applicable to the zoning classifications applied to properties within the Planned Action Area (2) Development Thresholds (a) The following amount of various new land uses are contemplated by the Planned Action 3 SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Land Use Development Amount (square feet) General Industrial, Port 2,850,000 sf Industrial Mix and Aviation Business I Mixed Employment 1,000,000 sf 1 Includes uses permitted in the General Industrial (GI), Port Industrial Mix (PIM), Aviation Business (AB) described in the SKIA Subarea Plan, Section C 2 Includes uses permitted in the Mixed Employment (ME) zone described in the SKIA Subarea Plan, Section C (b) If future development proposals in the SKIA Planned Action Area exceed the development thresholds specified in this ordinance, further environmental review may be required pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -172 Furthermore, if proposed development would alter the assumptions and analysis in the Planned Action EIS, further environmental review may be required Shifting the development amount between categories of uses may be permitted so long as the total build -out does not exceed the aggregate amount of development and trip generation reviewed in the EIS, and so long as the impacts of that development have been identified in the Planned Action EIS and are mitigated consistent with Exhibit B (3) Transportation (a) Trip Ranges & Thresholds The number of new pm peak hour trips anticipated in the Planned Action area and reviewed in the EIS are as follows Total PM Peak Hour Trips 4,576 Uses or activities that would exceed these maximum trip levels will require additional SEPA review (b) Concurrency The determination of transportation impacts shall be based on the City's concurrency management program contained in BMC 11.12 070 (c) Traffic Impact Mitigation In order to mitigate transportation related impacts, all Planned Action Projects shall be responsible for a proportional share of off -site improvements for local streets and roads listed in Exhibit B A proposed project's proportional share shall be determined based on a traffic generation study, included with the planned action checklist required by Section G 1 of this ordinance The study shall consider the type, intensity and location of the proposal, and its proportional demand for identified local traffic improvements This mitigation shall not duplicate any improvements required pursuant to BMC 11 12 070 (d) Director Discretion. The Director of Community Development shall have discretion to determine incremental and total trip generation, consistent with the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (latest edition) or an alternative manual accepted by the City Engineer at his or her sole discretion, for each project permit application proposed under this Planned Action (4) Elements of the Environment and Degree of Impacts A proposed project that would result in a significant change in the type or degree of impacts to any of the elements of the environment analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, would not qualify as a Planned Action 4 SKIA Planned Action Ordinance (5) Changed Conditions Should environmental conditions change significantly from those analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official may determine that the Planned Action designation is no longer applicable until supplemental environmental review is conducted E Planned Action Review Criteria (1) The City's SEPA Responsible Official may designate as "Planned Actions ", pursuant to RCW 43.21C.030, applications that meet all of the following conditions (a) The proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit A of this ordinance, (b) The proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Planned Action EIS and Section 4.1) of this ordinance, (c) The proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of Section 4 D of this ordinance, (d) The proposal is consistent with the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and the SKIA Sub -area Plan, (e) The proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS, (f) The proposal's significant impacts have been mitigated by application of the measures identified in Exhibit B, this ordinance, and other applicable city regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required, (g) The proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and regulations, and the Responsible Official determines that these constitute adequate mitigation, and (h) The proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36 70A.200(1), unless the essential public facility is accessory to or part of a development that is designated as a planned action under this ordinance (2) The City shall base its decision on review of a SEPA checklist, or an alternative form authorized by state law, and review of the application and supporting documentation (3) A proposal that meets the criteria of this section shall be considered to qualify and be designated as a Planned Action, consistent with the requirements or RCW 43.21 C 030, WAC 197 -11 -164 et seq, and this ordinance F Effect of Planned Action (1) Designation as a Planned Action project means that a qualifying proposal has been reviewed in accordance with this ordinance and found to be consistent with its development parameters and thresholds, and with the environmental analysis contained in the Planned Action EIS (2) Upon determination by the City's SEPA Responsible Official that the proposal meets the criteria of Section 4 D and qualifies as a Planned Action, the proposal shall not require a SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to SEPA G Planned Action Permit Process Applications for Planned Actions shall be reviewed pursuant to the following process (1) Development applications shall meet all applicable requirements of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC). Applications for Planned Actions shall be made on forms provided by the City and shall include a SEPA checklist, or an approved Planned Action checklist 5 SKU Planned Action Ordinance (2) The City's Director of Community Development or designee shall determine whether the application is complete as provided in BMC 20 02 090. (3) If the application is for a project located within the Planned Action Area defined in Exhibit A, the application will be reviewed to determine if it is consistent with the criteria of this ordinance and thereby qualifies as a Planned Action protect (a) The decision of the SEPA Responsible Official regarding qualification of a project as a Planned Action is a Type I decision The SEPA Responsible Official shall notify the applicant of his/her decision Notice of the determination shall also be mailed or otherwise verifiably delivered to federally recognized tribal governments and to agencies with jurnsdiction over the planned action project, pursuant to Chapter 1, Laws of 2012 (Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill (ESSB) 6406) (b) If the project is determined to qualify as a Planned Action, it shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedures specified in BMC 20 02 040, whether Type II or Type III, except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review shall be required (c) Notice of the application for a planned action project shall be pursuant to BMC 20 02.100 and 20 02 110 (4) If notice is required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required by this ordinance (5) Development Agreement. To provide additional certainty about applicable requirements, the City or an applicant may request consideration and execution of a development agreement for a Planned Action project The development agreement may address review procedures applicable to a Planned Action project, permitted uses, mitigation measures, payment of impact fees or provision of improvements through other methods, design standards, phasing, vesting of development rights, or any other topic that may properly be considered in a development agreement consistent with RCW 36 70B.170 et seq (6) If a project is determined to not qualify as a Planned Action, the SEPA Responsible Official shall so notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure consistent with the City's SEPA regulations and the requirements of state law The notice shall describe the elements of the application that result in failure to qualify as a Planned Action (7) Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Actions may incorporate or otherwise use relevant elements of the Planned Action EIS, as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA requirements The SEPA Responsible Official may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non - qualifying project to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Planned Action EIS SECTIONS Monitorme and Review A The City shall monitor the progress of development in the designated Planned Action Sub -area to ensure that it is consistent with the assumptions of this ordinance and the Planned Action EIS regarding the type and amount of development and associated impacts, and with the mitigation measures and improvements planned for the SKIA Planned Action Area B This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed by the SEPA Responsible Official no later than five years from its effective date The review shall determine the continuing relevance of the planned action assumptions and findings with respect to environmental conditions in the Planned Action area, the impacts of development, and required mitigation 6 SKIA Planned Action Ordinance measures Based upon this review, the City may propose amendments to this ordinance or may supplement or revise the Planned Action EIS, as appropriate C When planned action monitoring indicates that development proposals that generate 650 PM peak hour trips have been submitted, the City will begin work towards developing a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Transportation to address identified impacts to state transportation facilities The MOU may address the timing, design and funding of state facilities, and/or such other topics as the parties may determine SECTION 6 . Con ict. In the event of a conflict between this Ordinance or any mitigation measure unposed thereto, and any ordinance or regulation of the City, the provisions of this ordinance shall control, EXCEPT that the provision of any International Building Code shall supersede SECTION 7 . Severabikty If any one or more sections, sub - sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect SECTION 8 . Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law PASSED by the City Council the day of , 2012 JIM McDONALD, Council President Approved this day of , 2012 PATTY LENT, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHANNON CORIN, City Clerk ROGER A LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the day of 9 2012 EFFECTIVE the day of 9 2012 ORDINANCE NO R \Legal \Legal \Ordinances \Community Development \SKIA Planned Action Ordinance docx 7 SKIA Planned Action Ordinance I 1 1 I 1 11 1� I 1 1 . •. l•::O.r�. -ems• ARA WQ.IR gy lc'Eii 'J �a NEV tlrcQ= � ur IN r rr�� 111s" j SON Legend Subareas MA Me MD ME MKW PWA 0 025 05 073 1 r� ... • ... Exhibit B South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) Subarea Plan Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires environmental review for project and non - project proposals that may have adverse impacts upon the environment In order to meet SEPA requirements, the City of Bremerton issued the Draft SKIA Subarea Plan Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement on June 9, 2011, and Final Environmental Impact Statement on March 29, 2012 The Draft Environmental Impact Statement and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement are referenced collectively herein as the "EIS" The EIS has identified significant impacts that would occur with the future development of the Planned Action area, together with a number of possible measures to mitigate those significant impacts. The purpose of this Mitigation Document is to document the specific mitigation measures identified in the EIS, based upon the identified significant impacts The EIS considers potential impacts associated with the natural environment, greenhouse gases, land use, cultural resources„ aesthetics, transportation, public services and utilities The mitigation measures would apply to future development proposals which are consistent with the EIS and located within the Planned Action area (see Exhibit A) It should be noted that some EIS mitigation measures identified in the EIS address potential Subarea Plan policies and development standards. These measures have been considered as part of the Subarea Plan process and are not included in this Mitigation Document This Exhibit also summarizes measures, excluding background discussion and similar information. Please refer to the Draft and Final EIS for complete text associated with each element of the environment. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Applicable Regulations and Requirements Earth • Specific foundation support systems to be used for onsite improvements will be determined as part of the specific design and permit process for infrastructure and individual buildings associated with future site development. • Site - specific studies and evaluations would be conducted in accordance with City of Bremerton Municipal Code requirements and the provisions of the most recent version of the IBC Landsliding • If any development occurs adjacent to steeper slopes within SKIA, site - specific slope stability analyses would be conducted during the design and permit process in order to determine the required setback buffer widths. Potential mitigation measures include 2 Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures limiting soil disturbance and vegetation removal, limiting building footprint and impervious surface areas, constructing retaining walls, and revegetating the slopes located within moderate to high geologically hazardous areas • During a large seismic event, some sloughing and slope movement would likely occur within loose surficial materials on the steeper slopes present within SKIA Site - specific analysis of any development planned adjacent to or near these slopes would be completed during the design and permit process to address specific methods to mitigate potential landslide impacts Erosion During construction, temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures and Best Management Practices would be used to control erosion. These measures would be consistent with City regulations, and could include the following • Limit areas of exposure • Schedule earthwork during drier times of the year • Retain vegetation where possible, especially on the steeper slope areas within SKIA • Seed or plant appropriate vegetation on exposed areas as soon as earthwork is completed • Construct stabilized construction entrances with rock pads or truck washing stations to limit excess soil materials from entering the right -of -way • Route surface water through temporary drainage channels around and away from disturbed soils or exposed slopes • Use silt fences, temporary sedimentation ponds, or other suitable sedimentation control devices to collect and retain possible eroded material • Cover exposed soil stockpiles and exposed slopes with plastic sheeting, as appropriate • Use straw mulch and erosion control matting to stabilize graded areas and reduce erosion and runoff impacts to slopes, where appropriate • Intercept and drain water from any surface seeps, if encountered • Incorporate contract provisions allowing temporary cessation of work under certain, limited circumstances, if weather conditions warrant Seismic Hazards With development consistent with the City of Bremerton Municipal Code and IBC, no additional mitigation measures would be required Settlement Impacts associated with potential settlement of buildings, roadways, utilities, or other infrastructure improvements constructed on areas with peat deposits would be mitigated by use of typical design and construction measures that could include- partial to full removal of peat deposits and replacement with structural fill; preloading; use of geosynthetic reinforcing materials to support fill materials; settlement monitoring; use of driven steel pipe or H -piles or i rammed aggregate piers for building foundation support. Construction Excavation Impacts from temporary construction excavations could be mitigated through the use of properly designed and constructed excavation shoring systems or sloped excavations in accordance with 3 Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures Safety Standards for Construction Work Part N, Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296- 155 Construction Dewatering Site - specific investigations and analyses during the design and permitting process would determine what structures may require or be influenced by excavation dewatering. Mitigation measures to control the potential impact of excavation dewatering include site - specific design and control of dewatering systems, minimizing the extent and duration of dewatering, and monitoring for settlement. Extracted groundwater may contain certain chemical contaminants and/or high turbidity, which might necessitate special handling, treatment, and/or disposal methods. Mitigation measures include monitoring to assess the quality of dewatering discharges and treatment, of needed, to comply with applicable state and local requirements Placement of Structural Fill Ground subsidence impacts could be mitigated by designing the fill to control adjacent settlements, including settlement monitoring and use of geosynthetnc reinforcing materials to support fill materials over peat Adjacent structures /surfaces could be monitored during construction to verify that no adverse settlement occurs. Placement of structural fill to modify site grades adjacent to high or moderate geologically hazardous areas would require site - specific geotechnical investigations, slope stability analyses, and design and construction of earth retention structures, fill slopes, and drainage and erosion control measures as needed to stabilize the area Foundation Construction Foundation construction impacts could be mitigated by site specific design and construction procedures, including temporary excavation shoring and dewatering, overexcavation of unsuitable materials and replacement with structural fill, use of deep foundations or ground improvement techniques, conducting pre- and post - construction surveys of nearby buildings, monitoring of ground movements, and vibration monitoring during pile installation. Aquifer Recharge Areas Groundwater protection strategies to be used for onsrte improvements will be determined as part of the specific design and permit process for infrastructure and individual buildings associated with future site development Site- specific studies and evaluations would be conducted in accordance with City of Bremerton Municipal Code requirements, including conditions set forth by the City's Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO). Methods are available to build out SKIA without resulting in significant unavoidable adverse impacts. Mitigation measures to limit impacts to aquifer recharge areas during each mayor stage of project are discussed below. Construction impacts are short-term impacts that could occur during the construction phase of site redevelopment. BMPs to manage site construction and operation activities will be in place to reduce potential impacts to aquifer recharge areas. Environmental monitoring during the construction process will verify that required best management practices are followed 4 Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures BMPs required under the City's CAO to control construction - related impacts include, but are not limited to, proper containment and storage of construction materials, proper containment and disposal of waste materials, and appropriate and effective management of stormwater BMPs required under the City's CAO to control operational- related impacts include, but are not limited to, spill control plans, waste management plans, and appropriate long -term management of sanitary sewer and stormwater management infrastructure Plants and Animals The following mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts to plants, animals, and their habitat. • Required stormwater best management practices would attenuate flows and prevent polluted water from entering the stormwater system and ensure that construction and operation activities would not impact the ESA - listed species, critical habitats, or Essential Fish Habitat in Sinclair Inlet, Hood Canal, North Bay, and/or their tributaries in the project vicinity • Comply with critical area mitigation sequence requirements in the City of Bremerton critical areas ordinance to avoid, minimize, and mitigate for unavoidable impacts to wetlands, streams, and their buffers • Stream mitigation could include improving fish access through redesigned culvert crossings or installation of fish passable culverts associated with new road crossings. Install native plants, as possible, and remove invasive plants, in accordance with Executive Order 13112, to provide habitat for native ammals and to reduce future maintenance efforts • Nest removal for species protected under MBTA would occur outside of nesting season after birds have fledged CLIMATE CHANGE AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Greenhouse gas mitigating measures identified in the EIS were for proposed plan features that could be incorporated into the Subarea Plan policies and development standards These mitigating measures were considered as part of the planning process and adopted zoning and development regulations contained in the SKIA Subarea Plan, Sections C and D, already address potential greenhouse gas mitigating measures No additional measures are necessary 5 Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures LAND USE Applicable Regulations and Requirements Many land use mitigating measures identified in the EIS were for proposed plan features that have been incorporated into the Subarea Plan policies and development standards Adopted zoning and development regulations contained in the SKIA Subarea Plan, Sections C and D, already address potential land use mitigating measures identified in the EIS CULTURAL RESOURCES Applicable Regulations and Requirements The EIS identified applicable federal and state laws that govern protection and preservation of archaeological sites as described below. Federal Laws • The Archaeological Resource Protection Act of 1979 helps secure the protection of archaeological resources and sites that are on public and Indian lands and assists in sharing of information among entities seeking to preserve these resources • The National Historic Preservation Act establishes national standards for designation of historic and culturally significant properties, including archaeological sites In addition, this Act of Congress establishes the office of the State Historic Preservation Officer Section 106 USC 470(a)(d) of this law establishes a program to assist Indian Tribes in preserving their particular historic properties. • The Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 governs archaeological and other historic and cultural resources found in federal construction activities, including the construction of dams. • The Native American Graves and Repatriation Act governs protection, preservation, and repatriation of Native American remains and cultural artifacts found in Native American burial sites State Laws • Governor's Executive Order 05 -05 requires State agencies with capital improvement projects to integrate the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, the Governor's Office of Indian Affairs, and concerned Tribes into their capital project planning process This Executive Order affects any capital construction projects and any land acquisitions for purposes of capital construction • RCW 27.44 Indian Graves and Records provides protection for Indian graves and burial grounds, encourages voluntary reporting of said sites when they are discovered, and mandates a penalty for disturbance or desecration of such sites. • RCW 27.53 Archaeological Sites and Resources governs the protection and preservation of archaeological sites and resources and establishes the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation as the administering agency for these regulations • RCW 68.60 Abandoned and Historic Cemeteries and Historic Graves provides for the protection and preservation of abandoned and historic cemeteries and historic graves 6 Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures Other Mitigation All cultural resource mitigating measures identified in the EIS were for proposed plan features that could be incorporated into the Subarea Plan or other city policies. These mitigating measures were considered as part of the planning process and no additional measures are necessary AESTHETICS SKIA has historically been, and will continue to be, planned for industrial development. The expectation is for development with industrial character and uses that meets the intent of the respective zone. Consequently, future industrial development under any of the alternatives would be consistent with public expectations and unlikely to result in significant adverse visual impacts However, visual screening and measures to retain vegetation could help improve the overall character of future industrial development. Many of the aesthetics mitigating measures identified in the EIS were for proposed plan features that could be incorporated into the Subarea Plan policies and development standards These mitigating measures were considered as part of the planning process and have been incorporated into Section D of the Subarea Plan Please see section D for measures that could help retain forested areas, provide for visual screening from public nghts -of -way and ensure that view corridors are retained TRANSPORTATION Applicable Regulations and Commitments Many of the transportation mitigating measures identified in the EIS were for proposed plan features that could be incorporated into the Subarea Plan policies and development standards These mitigating measures were considered as part of the planning process and specific measures that have been incorporated into the SKIA Subarea Plan include SKU Subarea Plan, Section C Zoning and Development Standards, Chapter S Right of Way Standards — Chapter 5 contains conceptual street standards, a process for deferred construction of street frontage improvements, mtersection standards, including a preference for roundabouts, and non - motorized facilities standards This section also includes a conceptual roadway network and preferred street typologies map (Figure 1). SKU Subarea Plan, Section E Capital Facilities Plan — The Capital Facilities Plan identifies the Roadway Improvement Projects (local and state) as listed in Table 1 and Figure 1, below Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures The Capital Facilities Plan establishes a financing plan for transportation projects based on the following assumptions • Grants will be sought and used to pay for as much of the project costs as possible • SKIA developers /property owners are responsible for funding the portion of local road improvements that are not funded by grants. • The state is responsible for the cost of state road projects other than local matching requirements, which, from recent experience, can be up to 20% Table 1. SKIA Subarea Plan Capital Facilities Plan: Transportation Projects # Project Description Cost "c "'� �3'�`;t ''n"�t":v^r k s§�i'Na * s Fit�n�''S'� T3 _' ° � �z _a Tc�*�. -x s .�-ar x�- R 4 � � s , t,s. ,x s9r?�' +,��c3 � , c, - � s > `?� -w 7r i K• �ys<':�'� � ;�' V ,. '.°rr "-,�. T1 Area B Collector New roadway west of SR -3 at Cross SKIA $ 4,441400 Road intersection ' T2 Area C Collector New roadway south of Lake Flora Road to 1,835,600 Road the Belfair Bypass T3 Area D Collector Portion of new roadway south of Lake Flora 498,000 Road Road T4 Area F Collector New roadway north from Lake Flora Road 3,140,000 Road T5 Area G Collector New roadway east from Cross SKIA Road 415,100 Road T6 Area A Local 0 43 miles of local access roads 681,100 Access Road T7 Area B Local 130 miles of local access roads 2,059,200 Access Road T8 Area C Local 130 miles of local access roads 2,059,200 Access Road T9 Area D Local 0 35 miles of local access roads 554,400 Access Road T1 Area E Local 0.74 miles of local access roads 1,172,200 0 Access Road T1 Area F Local 1.00 miles of local access roads 1,584,000 1 Access Road TI Area G Local 0.52 miles of local access roads 823,700 2 Access Road T1 Analysis Area C/D New intersection southeast of existing Lake 9 and Lake Flora Flora Road / SR 3 intersection 1,000,000 Road 8 Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures # Project Description Cost Cross -SKIA T2 Connector and Lake New intersection at southern terminus of 1,000,000 0 Flora Road extension of Cross -SKIA Connector T2 Lake Flora Widening to southern end of potential 3,201,100 3 Widening southern end of Cross -SKIA Road T2 Trails 12 miles of trails 1,300,000 5 Total Cost of Local 25,765,000 Roads _ !*r.4' 2�10'7 " � "Ei'-{yvk-F ye Pi's M`�- +id� Y' f fey "xt 1 !, i'r. 4t a T' n "``s.. .;j '4`v' »x F: t '.:'"'` c La ir - ' �te s%a �� ,:•= c-';�. � ...�) �a �, � � �„ �, ;r T1 SR 3 / Imperial Way Signalize intersection, modify approaches 2,000,000 3 T1 SR 3 / Sunnyslope Signalize intersection, modify approaches 2,000,000 4 Road T1 SR 3 / SR 16 / Sam Grade separation 63,000,000 5 Christopherson Ave T1 Old Clifton Road / Signalize intersection add dedicated right 6 SR 116 Eastbound turn EB and dedicated left turn WB 1,000,000 Ramps T1 Old Clifton Road / 7 SR 16 Westbound Signalize intersection 500,000 Ramps T1 Analysis Area C New intersection southwest of existing Lake 2,000,000 8 and SR 3 Flora Road / SR 3 intersection Cross -SKIA T2 Connector / New intersection at northern terminus of 500,000 1 Analysis Area B / Cross -SKIA Connector SR 3 T2 SR 3 Widening Widening from Imperial Way to Gorst 109,000,000 2 T2 Belfair Bypass 2-lane divided highway with capability for 4 76,000,000 4 lanes Total Cost of State 256,000,000 Roads Source SKL4 Subarea Plan, Capital Facilities Plan 2012 9 Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures Figure 1 Roadway Project Locations f MYOFSOWD"M 1 i.r C s 1 I I TIT I T14 1' ` �— T18 1 Area OW®ffanRd a "'� SE Wkk Rd T1 1 [sue Area Br TS T19 Area A iF Ot LEGEND T19 - - -• ce9eetor Ronda 0 T" PraposedlBeUauBypese E Area F � SKIAAreas roa C rea a T4 4W PoW*d Development Areas r gg a SpeaficTr W-tabw r T2 T3 (made iiterchanges etc) r ® Area Trer spartatvon Protects p ®= AR Development Area TradS (meal access trails, eta) ' r r r N NOT M SC Local roads. Development proposal applications submitted to the City for planned action review will include a trip generation and distribution report. The City will review and verify this report for use in determining the percentage share contribution from the proposal for local road improvements. State roads. The EIS and Subarea Plan recognize that coordination with the Washington State Department of Transportation ( WSDOT) to ensure that improvements to state facilities needed as a result of growth and development in SKIA is essential. The City should work with WSDOT to prepare a Memorandum of Understanding or other instrument to establish the process for improvements to state facilities impacted by SKIA development. NOTE: MITIGATION STRUCTURE. Staff is currently developing a mitigation structure to clearly outline the manner in which proportional fees will be charged for traffic impacts. This will be presented prior to adoption. Other Mitigation Transit, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Circulation Assuming the transit, bicycle, and pedestrian elements of the SKIA Subarea Plan are implemented, no additional mitigation measures are required for these modes of travel. 10 Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures Traffic Safety Future development would lead to additional traffic passing through the Collision Analysis Location (CAL) identified by WSDOT at SR 3 near Lake Flora Road Implementing the intersection improvements described above to improve traffic operations at the SR 3 / Lake Flora Road intersection should also reduce the number of collisions, particularly those where failure to yield was the primary cause. While this impact is considered less - than- significant with mitigation, monitoring of this location should continue after the implementation of any improvements at the intersection PUBLIC SERVICES Mitigation measures can be taken to prevent or further minimize environmental consequences to public services, including • Coordinate with South Kitsap Fire and Rescue and Bremerton Police Department during final design, construction, and operation of future development under proposed action to ensure that reliable emergency access is maintained. • Reduce public safety impacts thru adherence to CPTED design standards UTILITIES Stormwater Applicable Regulations and Requirements • Water quality and quantity impacts can be mitigated by the practices required by the City's regulatory process for stormwater (BMC 15 04) Water and Wastewater Applicable Regulations and Requirements • Bremerton Municipal Code 15 02 and 15 03 set forth standards for water and wastewater with which all development must comply • Future development would comply with adopted City policies and regulations in the SKIA Subarea Plan, Section E Capital Facilities Plan and other applicable water and wastewater planning documents. The SKIA Subarea Plan Capital Facilities Plan identifies water and sewer projects in SKIA as shown in Table 2 • The Capital Facilities Plan establishes that SKIA developers /property owners are responsible for the local access water lines that provide access to their property from the core water system and that the cost of core water system improvements would be paid by the City and/or SKIA developers /property owners. Because requirements will vary depending on the location and nature of the proposal, the City will work with applicants on a case -by -case basis to determine project - specific needs Exhibit B: SKIA Planned Action Ordinance Mitigation Measures Table 2 Water and Sewer Projects i "W Y itcri Y-40 0'eWSM "'54_N�Ak F"I'l Wit Project Cost 16" Transmission Main from City system to New Reservoir $2,201,000 1,000,000 Gallon Water Storage Reservoir and Miscellaneous Pump 2,545,900 Station & Treatment Upgrades Primary 16" Loop 5,995,300 Secondary 8" & 10" Loops Built Along with Local Access Roads 1,590,800 Total 12,333,000 X -A % i &N Fir fi ''' In, g3 Project cost Secondary 8" & 10" Gravity Sewer Built Along with Local Access $2,080,300 Roads Sewer Service for Area G 4,921,100 Pump Station 1 4" Force Main 8" –10" Gravity Sewer New Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Plant #1 with Re-Use, Sewer 13,499,300 Service for Areas A (partial) and B MBR Plant Pump Station 2 6" Force Main Winter Sewage Disposal / Groundwater Recharge Re-Use ex 8" DI Water for Reclaimed Water Effluent to Golf Course 8" –10" Gravity Sewer New MBR Plant #2 with Re-Use 12,391,000 MBR Plant Pump Station 3 6" Force Main 8" –10" Gravity Sewer Winter Sewage Disposal / Groundwater Recharge Sewer Service for Areas E & F 2,433,000 Pump Station 4 4" Force Main 8" –10" Gravity Sewer Total 35,324,700 12