HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/15/2011 PACKET(DRAFT) AGENDA
Regular Meeting - Bremerton Planning Commission
(Subject to PC approval)
November 15, 2011
5:30 P.M.
th
345 – 6Street
Meeting Chamber – First Floor
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL (quorum present)
III. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
IVAPPROVAL OF MINUTES:
October 18, 2011 Regular meeting.
o
V. PUBLIC MEETING
A. Call to the Public:
Public comments on any item not on tonight’s agenda
B. Public Workshop
1. Shoreline Master Program – Public Access Inventory & Definitions
VI. BUSINESS MEETING
A. Chair Report:
Chairman Hoell
B. Director Report:
Andrea Spencer.
C.Old Business:
D.New Business
VII. ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is
January 17, 2012
Planning Commission meeting packets are available on-line at
www.ci.bremerton.wa.us
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 11/15/11
Minutes for
City of Bremerton Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
October 18, 2011
I. Call to Order
Chairman Hoell
The meeting was called to order by at 5:30 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Those present were: Commissioner Cockburn, Commissioner Jose, Commissioner Lambert,
Commissioner Mosiman, Commissioner Tift (arrived at 6:10), and Chairman Hoell. Commissioner
Streissguth was excused. Quorum certified.
Also present: Andrea Spencer, Allison Daniels, and Pam Bykonen (DCD staff).
III. Approval of Agenda
Chairman HoellA motion was made by Commissioner Jose and
introduced the agenda.
seconded by Commissioner Mosiman to approve the agenda as presented
. It was agreed by
general consensus to approve the agenda as presented.
IV. Approval of Minutes
The minutes of the Regular Meeting held on September 20, 2011 were presented for approval by
Chairman HoellA motion was made by Commissioner Jose and seconded by Commissioner
.
Lambert to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of September 20, 2011 as presented.
Called
for a vote: Commissioner Cockburn: Yes; Commissioner Jose: Yes; Commissioner Lambert: Yes;
Commissioner Mosiman: Yes; Commissioner Tift: Yes; Chairman Hoell: Yes. The motion carried.
V. Public Meeting
A. Call To The Public.
(public comments on any item not on tonight’s agenda)
Chairman Hoell
asked if there were any comments from citizens. Seeing none, she closed
this portion of the meeting.
BPublic Hearing – Amendments to Special Development Standards BMC 20.46
.
regarding Opiate Substitution Treatment Facilities:
Using a PowerPoint presentation,
Allison Daniels, City Planner
, gave an overview of the proposed amendments to the zoning
code chapter of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) 20.46. Currently, the code is silent
regarding opiate substitution treatment facilities and staff has had to refer to development
standards used by medical offices and clinics. Allison researched what criteria other
jurisdictions in Washington used to determine appropriate development and parking
standards for opiate substitution treatment facilities. Most jurisdictions’ permit process
required an administrative decision with no public comment period.
Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2011 Page 1 of 4
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 11/15/11
Amendments to BMC 20.46 would include:
¥
Adding the definition of what constitutes an opiate substitution treatment facility;
¥
Requiring a Type III Conditional Use Permit decided upon by a third-party Hearing
Examiner;
¥
Requiring a fourteen (14)-day comment period;
¥
Allowing opiate substitution treatment facilities in commercial zones with medical offices
and clinics;
¥
Preventing opiate substitution treatment facilities from locating within 1,000 feet of
schools, parks, or other opiate substitution treatment facilities;
¥
Requiring opiate substitution treatment facilities to be located on collector streets or
higher;
¥
Requiring one parking space per 150 gross square feet of floor area
Commissioner Mosiman
asked who the Hearing Examiner was for the City of Bremerton
Allison
and what his capacity was. explained that the City contracts with Sound Law Center
of Seattle to provide quasi-judicial decisions regarding City land use and code enforcement.
Commissioner Tift
asked if Kitsap County and other local jurisdictions allow opiate
Allison
substitution treatment facilities. said that Kitsap County does not allow them and the
legality of that decision has been questioned; other jurisdictions in Kitsap County have
imposed moratoriums similar to Bremerton on opiate substitution treatment facilities.
Commissioner Tift
asked if the site chosen by Evergreen Treatment on Burwell Street and
Allison
Montgomery Avenue had sufficient parking to operate at that location. said that
there was not enough parking on the site, but satellite parking could have been an option.
Commissioner Cockburn
commented that the number of zones that an opiate substitution
treatment facility could be located in should be reduced. He felt it would decrease
Andrea
controversy by preventing the facilities from locating within centers. noted that the
restrictions of locating near parks and schools would prevent opiate substitution treatment
facilities from locating in those areas.
Medical Office/Clinic is the most similar use to an opiate substitution treatment facility; staff
felt it was most logical to use similar guidelines with additional restrictions when
determining building standards and zoning for opiate substitution treatment facilities.
Commissioner
Referring to the RCW regulating opiate substitution treatment facilities,
Lambert
asked if Kitsap County would have the ability to increase the number of patients
Allison
serviced by a facility located within the Bremerton City Limits. explained that
approval of the jurisdiction of the facility is required but the RCW is vague on how to go
about it. Other jurisdictions have used various methods to gain approval for increasing
patient numbers.
Chairman Hoell
asked if staff knew how many local pharmacies honor methadone
Allison
prescriptions. did not have that information and noted that methadone can also be
prescribed as a short-term pain reliever so it would be difficult to determine who was
receiving methadone as an addiction replacement and who was prescribed it as a pain
reliever.
Commissioner Mosiman
asked what the unintended consequences would be of having an
opiate substitution treatment facility located in the city such as littering, public nuisance, and
Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2011 Page 2 of 4
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 11/15/11
Allison
loitering. said that parking, loitering, and theft were often cited as side effects of
having an opiate substitution treatment facility, but the facilities are usually located in urban
Andrea
areas where those problems would exist whether the facility was there or not. added
that Council wanted parking and adequate public comment addressed in the permitting
process.
Commissioner Mosiman
commented that the facilities exist for people seeking treatment.
He cautioned against implementing standards that are so strict the facilities could not
develop.
Commissioner Jose
felt that the traffic pattern or surges of traffic would be of concern. He
Allison
asked if Allison’s research included traffic patterns. said her survey focused on
parking not traffic volume.
Commissioner Lambert
felt that the proposed amendments went beyond what other
jurisdictions required. She asked about public comment – could the Hearing Examiner
Allison
accept testimony based on emotions and not facts? said the Hearing Examiner
cannot base his decision on testimony that is not backed up with facts but he could require
additional conditions for the permit.
Commissioner Tift
suggested having Dr. Scott Lindquist of the Kitsap County Health
District attend public hearing for opiate substitution treatment facilities.
A motion was made by Commissioner Jose and seconded by Commissioner Mosiman to
recommend that the Planning Commission adopt the citation for the Special Development
Standards and definition for Opiate Substitution Treatment Facility as detailed in Attachment
1 based on the Findings and Conclusions in Attachment 3.
Called for a vote: Commissioner
Cockburn: No; Commissioner Jose: Yes; Commissioner Lambert: Yes; Commissioner Mosiman:
Yes; Commissioner Tift: Yes; Chairman Hoell: Yes. The motion carried.
Note: Commission Cockburn’s No vote was due to the number of zones the facilities could be
located in.
VI. Business Meeting
A.Chairman’s Report:None
.
B. Director’s Report: Andrea
reported that the City is expecting a $2M shortfall in the
budget and is reviewing all departments to find ways to cut costs.
C. Old Business:None
.
D. New Business: None
.
VII. Adjournment
Meeting was adjourned at 6:13 p.m. The next Regular Meeting is scheduled for November 15, 2011.
Respectfully submitted by:
Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2011 Page 3 of 4
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 11/15/11
_______________________________________
Andrea L. Spencer, AICP, Executive Secretary
Approved by:
_______________________________________
Lois Hoell, Chairman
Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2011 Page 4 of 4
Commission Meeting Date: October 15, 2011 Agenda Item: V.B.1
CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TITLE: Workshop to discuss the definition and public access sections of
the Draft SMP
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development
PRESENTED BY:
Nicole Floyd, City Planner
SUMMARY:
This workshop is part of a series of workshops to discuss the Draft Shoreline Master Program
(SMP) update. Each workshop focuses on a different set of topics and or sections of the code.
In order to help identify sections which have been previously discussed and are to be discussed
Attachment I
the table of contents has been provided as . This workshop will focus on the
following sections:
Definitions
Public Access Inventory
In drafting these sections the City utilized language from the existing SMP where applicable.
Made changes to bring the code into compliance with State requirements, to and clarify portions
of the code that have been difficult to interpret or enforce in the past. Prior to presenting these
sections to the Planning Commission the Citizen Advisory Committee reviewed them in detail
and recommended revisions. Staff has revised the draft sections based on the Committee’s
Attachments II and III
input. The revised code sections are in this packet and are identified as
respectively.
CODE SECTION OVERVIEW:
20.16.300 – Definitions:
The definitions listed in this chapter are intended to help the reader better understand technical
terms discussed in the document. This section is not intended to be a stand alone document for
all words used therefore words already defined within the BMC are not re-defined in the SMP.
In order to prepare a complete list of words Staff reviewed:
The definition sections of other jurisdictions that have recently received approval from
the Department of Ecology.
The existing SMP definition section. Words kept from the existing document were
compared with the Ecology guidelines to ensure the definitions were updated if
necessary. Words no longer used in the new SMP document were removed from the
definition section.
The WAC and RCW. Some words already defined by the State have been added for
quick reference and readers ease.
While reviewing the definitions section please ask yourself if there are any words that you have
read in the text of the code that are not defined.
Appendix 1 – Public Access Inventory:
Public access is one of the three primary goals of the Shoreline Master Program. The attached
document is intended as a reference to Staff, community groups, and citizens to quickly identify
the potential for improved public access along the shoreline. The document is broken into
1
shoreline reaches and addresses the existing access, potential for improvements, and the
potential barriers to improvements in each reach. Maps and photos are included to aid the
reader in identifying locations and improvement potential.
Public access can be enhanced by one of the following:
1. Better utilization of existing City owned facilities. Existing underutilized City owned
property such as sewage pump stations, vacant City owned land, and street ends
located on the shoreline are identified throughout the document.
2. New access locations on commercial lots. The Shoreline Master Program requires public
access improvements on new commercial development and redevelopment of
commercial properties. Areas likely to be redeveloped, or have new development are
identified.
3.
New access from subdivision. The Shoreline Master Program requires improved access
for new subdivisions of 4 or lots. Locations where this type of development is possible in
the future are identified. Due to the density of existing lots along the shoreline this is not
.
likely applicable in most areas
Please review the draft Public Access Inventory and evaluate it for accuracy. Potential
questions to ask while reviewing include:
1. Are there existing public access locations that are not listed?
2. Are you aware of potential improvements that are not listed?
3. Are there areas listed as improvable that should not be listed?
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment I: Table of Contents
Attachment II: Definitions
Attachment III: Public Access Inventory
2
Attachment I
2011 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Previously reviewed sections are in GREEN
New sections to review are in BLUE
Incomplete sections are in BLACK
20.16.100 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE…….…..……………………....
20.16.200 DOCUMENT GOALS……..……………………………............
20.16.210 – Intent …………………………………………………………
20.16.220 – Master Goal…………………………………………………
20.16.230 – General Goals……………………………………………
20.16.300 DEFINITIONS…………………………………………………
20.16.400 SHORELINE MAPS AND DESIGNATIONS.…………........
20.16.410 – Intent
20.16.420 – Shoreline maps
20.16.430 – Shoreline environmental designations and policies
20.16.440 – Shorelines of Statewide Significance
20.16.500 ADMINISTRATION…………………………………………….
20.16.510 – Applicability
20.16.520 – Permit Application Types
20.16.530 – Noticing Requirements
20.16.540 – Criteria of Approval
20.16.550 – Appeals
20.16.560 – Time Periods
20.16.570 – Violations and Penalties
20.16.580 – Shoreline Moratorium
20.16.590 – Restoration Project Relocation of OHWM
20.16.600 NONCONFORMITIES...................................................................
20.16.610 – Intent
20.16.620 – Establishment of a Legal Nonconformity and Applicability
20.16.630 – Annexations
20.16.640 – Definitions
20.16.650 – Nonconforming Lots
20.16.660 – Nonconforming Structures
20.16.670 – Unsuitable Structure for Uses
20.16.680 – Unlawful Uses and Structures
20.16.700 GENERAL POLICIES AND REGULATIONS……….……
20.16.710 – Buffers and Setbacks
20.16.720 – Vegetation Conservation
20.16.730 – No Net Loss / Mitigation Sequencing
20.16.740 – Public Access
20.16.750 – Water Quality, Stormwater, and Non-Point Pollution
20.16.760 – Archaeologically Sensitive Areas
20.16.770 – Lighting Requirements
1
Attachment I
20.60.780 – Parking Requirements
20.16.790 – Use Matrix and Height Table
20.16.800 USE REGULATIONS………………………………………
20.16.810 – Intent
20.16.820 – Aquaculture
20.16.830 – Commercial Development
20.16.840 – Forest Practices
20.16.850 – Industrial Development
20.16.860 – Marinas and Boating Facilities
20.16.870 – Recreational Development
20.16.880 – Residential Development
20.16.890– Roads, Railways, and Utilities
20.16.900 SHORE MODIFICATIONS………………………………….
20.16.910 – Intent
20.16.920 – Clearing and Grading
20.16.930 – Docks, Piers, and In-Water Structures
20.16.940 – Dredging
20.16.950 – Flood Hazard Reduction
20.16.960 – Landfills
20.16.970 – Restoration and Conservation
20.16.980 – Shoreline Stabilization
20.16.990 – Stormwater Control Facilities
APPENDICES …………………………….….…………….………..………
Public Access Inventory
2
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
20.16.300 Definitions
The following shall be deemed definitions for the Shoreline Master Program.
Where these definitions conflict with other definitions in the Bremerton Municipal
Code, these definitions shall prevail for projects within the shoreline jurisdiction.
Where they conflict with definitions in the Revised Code of Washington (RCW)
or the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) the RCW or WAC provisions
shall prevail. This list of definitions is not exhaustive, all definitions in RCW
90.58.030, WAC 173-26-020, BMC 20.42 and BMC 20.14.200 shall be deemed
definitions for this title. Words not defined within these codes shall be as defined
in Webster's Third New International Dictionary, latest edition.
Accessory Use:
A use that is demonstrably subordinate and incidental to the
principal use and which functionally supports its activity.
Act:
The Shoreline Management Act of 1971, Chapter 90.58 RCW. [WAC 173-
27-030(1)]
Adjacent Lands:
Property which is immediately bordering or abutting lands under
shoreline permit jurisdiction.
Alteration:
Any human activity which results or is likely to result in a significant
impact upon the existing condition of a critical area. Alterations include, but are
not limited to, grading, filling, dredging, draining, channelizing, applying any
hazardous substance, discharging pollutants except stormwater, paving,
constructing, applying gravel, modifying surface water management purposes,
cutting, pruning, topping, trimming, relocating or removing vegetation or any other
human activity which results or is likely to result in a significant impact to existing
vegetation, hydrology, wildlife, or wildlife habitat. Alterations do not include
walking, fishing, or any other passive recreation or other similar activities.
Applicant:
A person who files an application for permit under this Title and who is
either the owner of the land on which the proposed activity would be located, a
contract purchaser, or the authorized agent of such person.
Appurtenance:
Development necessarily connected to the use and enjoyment of
a single family residence and located landward of the perimeter of an associated
wetland and landward of the Ordinary High Water Mark. Normal appurtenances
include a garage, deck, driveway, utilities solely servicing a subject single family
residence, and grading which does not exceed 250 cubic yards.
Aquaculture:
the culture, harvesting or farming of food fish, shellfish, or other
aquatic plants and animals. Activities include the hatching, cultivating, planting,
feeding, raising, harvesting, and processing of aquatic plants and animals and
the maintenance and construction of necessary equipment, buildings and
growing areas. Cultivation methods include but are not limited to fish pens, fish
1
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
hatcheries, shellfish rafts, racks and long lines, seaweed floats and nets and the
culture of clams and oysters on tidelands and subtidal areas.
Associated Wetlands:
those wetlands which are in proximity to and either
influence or are influenced by tidal waters or a lake or stream subject to the
Shoreline Management Act.
Average Grade Level:
The average of the natural or existing topography of the
portion of the lot, parcel, or tract of real property which will be directly under the
proposed building or structure: In the case of structures to be built over water,
average grade level shall be the elevation of the Ordinary High Water Mark.
Calculation of the average grade level shall be made by averaging the elevations
at the center of all exterior walls of the proposed building or structure. [WAC 173-
27-030(3)]
Beach:
The zone of unconsolidated material that is moved by waves, wind, and
tidal currents, extending landward to the coastline.
Bluff:
A steep headland, promontory, broad faced bank, or cliff running adjacent to
and rising up from the shoreline. For the purpose of measuring buffers and
setbacks from the top of a bluff the following shall apply: A bluff rises up from the
OHWM to the first significant break in slope. The first significant break in slope is a
bench at least thirty (30) feet wide. The top of a bluff is the point where the first
significant break in slope occurs.
Boat Ramp:
Graded slopes, slabs, pads, planks, or rails used for launching
boats by means of a trailer, hand, or mechanical device.
Buffer:
An area that is contiguous to and protects a critical area which is required
for the continued maintenance, functioning, and or structural stability of a critical
area.
Bulkhead:
A solid or open pile wall erected generally parallel to and near the
ordinary high water mark for the purposes of protecting adjacent uplands from
waves or current action.
City:
The City of Bremerton
Clearing:
The removal vegetation.
Conditional Use:
A use or development which is classified as a conditional use or
is not classified within the Master Program, or materially interferes with the normal
public use of the water or shorelines of the state.
Conservation Easement:
A legal agreement that the property owner enters into a
restricted use of the land. Such restrictions can include, but are not limited to,
2
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
passive recreation uses such as trails or scientific uses and fences or other
barriers to protect habitat. The easement is recorded on a property deed, runs
with the land, and is legally binding on all present and future owners of the
property, therefore providing permanent or long-term protection.
Critical Areas:
Any of the following areas or ecosystems: aquifer recharge areas,
fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, geologically
hazardous areas, and wetlands as defined in RCW 36.70A and BMC 20.14.
Critical saltwater habitat:
Means all kelp beds, eelgrass beds, spawning and
holding areas for forage fish, such as herring, smelt and sandlance; shellfish
beds; mudflats, intertidal habitats with vascular plants, and areas with which
priority species have a primary association.
Development:
A use, consisting of the construction or exterior alteration of
structures; dredging; drilling, dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel or
minerals; bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a
permanent or temporary nature which interferes with the normal public use of the
surface of the waters overlying lands subject to this program at any state of water
level. [RCW 90.58.030(3d)]
Docks:
A fixed structure or structures floating upon the water.
Dredging:
The removal of earth, sand, sludge or other materials from the bottom
of a stream, river, lake, bay or other water body. The creation of temporary
depressions or contour alterations on tidelands or bedlands through the use of
aquaculture harvesting equipment approved by the Washington State
Department of Fish and Wildlife shall not be construed to be dredging.
Drift Cell, drift sector, or littoral cell:
A particular reach of marine shore in
which littoral drift may occur without significant interruption and which contains
any natural sources of such drift and also accretion shore forms created by such
drift.
Ecology:
The State of Washington Department of Ecology.
Ecological Function or Shoreline Functions:
The work performed or role
played by the physical, chemical, and biological processes that contribute to the
maintenance of the aquatic and terrestrial environments that constitute the
shoreline's natural ecosystem. See WAC 173-26-200 (2)(c).
Ecological Restoration:
An intentional activity that initiates or accelerates the
recovery of an ecosystem with respect to its health, integrity and sustainability.
Restoration attempts to return an ecosystem to its historic trajectory. Frequently,
the ecosystem that requires restoration has been degraded, damaged,
transformed or entirely destroyed as the direct or indirect result of human
3
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
activities. In some cases, these impacts to ecosystems have been caused or
aggravated by natural agencies such as wildfire, floods, storms, or volcanic
eruption, to the point at which the ecosystem cannot recover its pre-disturbance
state or its historic developmental trajectory. In cases where a historic trajectory
cannot be determined one should use a combination of knowledge of the
damaged ecosystem’s pre-existing structure, composition and functions rather
than the historic trajectory.
Emergency
is an unanticipated and/or imminent threat to public health, safety, or
the environment that requires immediate action within a time too short to allow
full compliance with the Master Program. Emergency construction is defined as
that necessary to protect property and facilities from the elements. All emergency
construction shall be consistent with the SMA and the Master Program (see
RCW 90.58.030(3eiii)).
Enhancement:
The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological
characteristics of a wetland to heighten, intensify, or improve specific function(s)
or to change the growth stage or composition of the vegetation present.
Enhancement is undertaken for specified purposes such as water quality
improvement, flood water retention, or wildlife habitat. Enhancement results in a
change in wetland function(s) and can lead to a decline in other wetland
functions, but does not result in a gain in wetland acres. Examples are planting
vegetation, controlling non-native or invasive species, and modifying site
elevations to alter hydro-periods.
Erosion:
The process whereby wind, rain, water, and other natural agents
mobilize and transport particles.
Estuary:
The zone or area of water in which freshwater and saltwater mingle and
water is usually brackish due to daily mixing and layering of fresh and saltwater.
Exempt development
is development listed in WAC 173-27-040 as exempt from
the definition of “substantial development,” and, therefore, exempt from the
substantial development permit process of the SMA. An activity that is exempt
from the substantial development provisions of the SMA must still be carried out
in compliance with policies and standards of the SMA and the Master Program.
Conditional use and/or variance permits may still be required even though the
activity does not need a substantial development permit (RCW 90.58.030(3e)).
Extreme Low Tide:
The lowest line on the land reached by a receding tide.
[RCW 90.58.030(2a)]
Fair Market Value:
The expected price at which the development can be sold to
a willing buyer. For developments which involve nonstructural operations such
as dredging, drilling, dumping, or filling, the fair market value is the expected cost
of hiring a contractor to perform the operation, or where no such value can be
4
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
calculated, the total of labor, equipment use, transportation, and other costs
incurred for the duration of the permitted project. [WAC 173-14-030(7)]
Feasible:
Actions that meet all of the following conditions:
(a) The action can be accomplished with technologies and methods that have
been used in the past in similar circumstances, or studies or tests have
demonstrated in similar circumstances that such approaches are currently
available and likely to achieve the intended results;
(b) The action provides a reasonable likelihood of achieving its intended purpose;
and
(c) The action does not physically preclude achieving the project's primary
intended legal use.
In cases where these guidelines require certain actions unless they are
infeasible, the burden of proving infeasibility is on the applicant. In determining
an action's infeasibility, the City may weigh the action's relative public costs and
public benefits, considered in short- and long-term time frames.
Fill:
Any material, such as earth, clay, sand, concrete, rubble, wood chips, bark
or waste of any kind which is placed, stored or dumped upon the surface of the
ground resulting in an increase in the natural surface elevation.
Floating Home:
A structure designed and operated substantially as a
permanently based structure and not as a vessel and is typically characterized by
permanent utilities, a semi-permanent anchorage/moorage design, and by the
lack of adequate self-propulsion to operate as a vessel.
Floats (Rafts):
floating structures that are moored, anchored, or otherwise
secured in the water that are not directly connected to the shoreline.
Floodway:
For purposes of determining the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master
Program in conjunction with the definition of “shoreland,” “floodway” means the
area, as identified in a Master Program, that either: (i) Has been established in
federal emergency management agency flood insurance rate maps or floodway
maps; or (ii) consists of those portions of a river valley lying streamward from the
outer limits of a watercourse upon which flood waters are carried during periods
of flooding that occur with reasonable regularity, although not necessarily
annually, said floodway being identified, under normal condition, by changes in
surface soil conditions or changes in types or quality of vegetative ground cover
condition, topography, or other indicators of flooding that occurs with reasonable
regularity, although not necessarily annually. Regardless of the method used to
identify the floodway, the floodway shall not include those lands that can
reasonably be expected to be protected from flood waters by flood control
devices maintained by or maintained under license from the federal government,
the state, or a political subdivision of the state.
5
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
Forage fish:
Small, schooling fish which serve as an important source of food for
other fish species, birds, and marine mammals. Examples of forage fish species
are herring, smelt, anchovies, and sardines.
Geotechnical Report:
A scientific study or evaluation conducted by a qualified
professional that includes a description of ground and surface hydrology and
geology, the affected land form and its susceptibility to mass wasting, erosion,
and other geologic hazards or processes, conclusions and recommendations
regarding the effect of the proposed development on geologic conditions, the
adequacy of the site to be developed, the impacts of the proposed development,
alternative approaches to the proposed development, and measures to mitigate
potential site specific and cumulative geological and hydrological impacts of the
proposed development, including the potential adverse impacts to adjacent and
down-current properties. Geotechnical reports shall conform to accepted
technical standards and must be prepared by a qualified professional engineer or
geologist who has professional expertise about the regional and local shoreline
geology and processes.
Grading:
The movement or redistribution of the soil, sand, rock, gravel,
sediment, or other material on a site in a manner that alters the natural contour of
the land.
Grubbing:
The removal of vegetative matter from underground, such as sod,
stumps, roots, buried logs or other debris, and shall include the incidental
removal of topsoil and earth.
Houseboat:
a vessel used for living quarters but licensed and designed
substantially as a mobile structure by means of detachable utilities or facilities,
anchoring, and the presence of adequate self-propulsion to operate as a vessel.
Height:
The distance measured from the average grade level to the highest
point of a structure: Television antennas, chimneys, and similar appurtenances
shall not be used in calculating height.
Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA):
A permit issued by the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife for modifications to waters of the State in
accordance with RCW 75.20.
Invasive:
A vegetative or animal species not native to a region and marked by a
tendency to spread, especially with proclivity to replace healthy native species.
In-Water Structure:
A structure located waterward of the ordinary high water
mark that either causes or has the potential to cause water impoundment or the
diversion, obstruction, or modification of water flow.
6
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
Littoral drift:
Themud, sand, or gravel materials moved parallel to the shoreline
in the nearshore zone by waves and currents.
Marina:
A water dependent facility that provides wet and/or dry moorage for over
ten (10) boats, and related accessory boat launching facilities and supplies and
services for small commercial and/or pleasure craft.Marinas may be designated
for temporary day-use only or for permanent (long-term) moorage.
May:
A choice to act or not, denoting the use of discretion in making a decision.
Mean Higher High Water (MHHW):
The tidal elevation obtained by averaging
each day's highest tide at a particular location over a period of nineteen years. It
is measured from the mean lower low water = 0.0 tidal elevation.
Mooring Buoy
: a floating object anchored to the bottom of a water body that
provides tie up capabilities for vessels. Mooring Buoy’s are regulated separately
from docks and piers.
Mixed-Use Commercial:
Mixed-use commercial developments are shoreline
developments which combine more than one separate but related activity into a
coordinated package. Activities usually include one or more water-dependent
uses with non-water dependent uses, and feature high amenity public access or
recreational uses. The public benefit will be evaluated and weighed against the
impact of the project in review of a mixed-use commercial development proposal.
Modification:
An action that modifies the physical configuration or qualities of the
shoreline area, usually through the construction of a physical element such as a
breakwater, dock, boat launch ramp, or other shoreline structures. A shoreline
modification also can consist of other activities, such as dredging and filling.
Nonconforming Development:
A shoreline use, site, or structure which was
lawfully constructed or established prior to the effective date of the Shoreline
Management Act or the Bremerton Shoreline Master Program or amendments
thereto, but which does not conform to present regulations or standards of the
Master Program or policies of the Act. [WAC 173-14-040(1b)]
Non-Water-Oriented Use:
A use which does not require or depend on a location
on or near the waterfront, and which is neither a water-dependent, water-related,
or water-enjoyment use as defined herein.
Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM):
The mark on all lakes, streams, and tidal
waters which will be found by examining the beds and banks and ascertaining
where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long
continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from
that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation, as that condition exists on the
effective date of this chapter, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may
7
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or
the department: In any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found,
the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher
high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line
of mean high water.
Photic Zone:
The area between the OHWM and approximately -30 feet Mean
Lower Low Water (MLLW).
Piers:
fixed, pile-supported structures extending over the water.
Primary Structure:
Any permanent building, road, bridge or utility requiring a
permit or approval which is necessary to support the primary use of a site.
Public Access, Limited (physical or visual):
Access with restrictions that are
deemed necessary to protect the health, safety or welfare of the public OR to
protect and maintain a particular site. Restrictions may limit times of use, or allow
access only to certain users. [A limitation to restrict access may not be based on
race, sex, color, creed, age or physical disability.] For example, such restrictions
may limit public use to daylight hours, limit use to residents of a private community,
or restrict use of tidelands used for shellfish production.
Public Access, Physical:
Unobstructed access with public use improvements
which are available to the general public extending from the public right-of-way to
OHWM
the or to the wetland directly abutting the OHWM. This includes access to
the navigable waters of any water body and to tidelands in marine waters.
Public Access, Visual:
Access with public use improvements available to the
general public which provide a view of the shoreline or water but do not allow
physical public access to the shoreline.
Qualified Professional:
A person with experience and training in the pertinent
scientific discipline whose expertise is appropriate for the relevant critical area and
meets the following criteria:
A) A qualified professional must have obtained a B.S. or B.A. or equivalent degree
in biology, engineering, environmental studies, fisheries, geomorphology, or
related field, and five (5) years of related work experience applicable to the scope
of the project. AND
B) A qualified professional proposing a structural solution such as a bulkhead or
retaining wall must be a civil engineer, geotechnical engineer, or geologist with
experience in the field and must be licensed in the State of Washington.
RCW:
Revised Code of Washington.
Rehabilitation:
The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological
characteristics of a site with the goals of repairing natural or historic functions
8
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
and processes of a degraded wetland. Rehabilitation results in a gain in wetland
function but does not result in a gain in wetland acres. Activities could involve
breaching a dike to reconnect wetlands to a floodplain or returning tidal
influences to a wetland.
Restore, Restoration, or ecological restoration
means the reestablishment or
upgrading of impaired ecological shoreline processes or functions. This may be
accomplished through measures including but not limited to re-vegetation,
removal of intrusive shoreline structures and removal or treatment of toxic
materials. Restoration does not imply a requirement for returning the shoreline
area to aboriginal or pre-European settlement conditions.
Shorelands or Shoreland Areas:
Those lands extending landward for two
hundred feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the
Ordinary High Water Mark; floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward
two hundred feed from such floodways; and all wetlands and river deltas
associated with the streams, lakes, and tidal waters which are subject to the
provisions of this chapter; the same to be designated as to location by the
Department of Ecology.
Shoreline jurisdiction
: All shorelines of the state and shorelands as defined in
RCW 90.58.030; in Bremerton this includes shorelands and water bodies
waterward of OHWM out to the middle of Sinclair Inlet and Port Orchard Bay, all
of Port Washington Narrows, Ostrich Bay, Oyster Bay, Phinney Bay and Mud
Bay, the portion of Kitsap Lake within the Bremerton City limits, Union Reservoir,
Twin Lakes, one mile of Gorst Creek and one mile of Union River.
Shall:
A mandate; an action that must be done.
Should:
A particular action that is required unless there is a demonstrated,
compelling reason, based on policy of the Shoreline Management Act and this
program against taking the action.
Shoreline Environment Designations:
The categories of shorelines
established by the City’s Master Program in order to provide a uniform basis for
applying policies and use regulations within physically distinct shoreline areas.
The City’s Shoreline Master Program classifies shorelines into the following
environment designations: Aquatic, aquatic conservancy, commercial, downtown
waterfront, industrial, isolated, multi-family residential, recreation, single family
residential and urban conservancy.
Shoreline Jurisdiction:
Those lands extending landward for 200’ in all
directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the OHWM; floodways and
100 year floodplains; and all wetlands and river deltas associated with the
streams, lakes, tidal waters and all other areas as defined by RCW 90.58.030.
9
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
Shoreline Master Program:
The general term for shoreline comprehensive
plans and regulations prepared under the jurisdiction of the Shoreline
Management Act.
Shoreline Permit:
A substantial development, conditional use, revision, or
variance permit or any combination thereof. [WAC 173-14-030(13)]
Shorelines:
All of the water areas of the State, including reservoirs and their
associated wetlands, together with the lands underlying them, except:
1. Shorelines of state-wide significance (sub-tidal Puget Sound);
2. Shorelines on segments of streams upstream of a point where the mean
annual flow is twenty (20) cubic feet per second or less, and the wetlands
associated with such upstream segments; and
3. Shorelines on lakes less than twenty (20) acres in size, and wetlands
associated with such small lakes.
Shorelines of Statewide Significance:
Shorelines designated by the State of
Washington that are major resources from which all people in the state derive
benefit. Shoreline areas in the City that are designated as shorelines of statewide
significance are portions of the Puget Sound adjacent to the city limits and Kitsap
Lake.
Shoreline Substantial Development:
any development of which the total cost,
or fair market value, whichever is higher, exceeds $5,000, or any development
which materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines
of the state.
State Master Program
: The cumulative total of all Shoreline Master Programs
approved or adopted by the Department of Ecology.
Structure:
A permanent or temporary edifice or building, or any piece of work
artificially built or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner,
whether installed on, above, or below the surface of the ground or water, except
for vessels. [WAC 173-14-03(15)]
Tidelands:
Land on the shore of marine water bodies between the line of
ordinary high tide and the line of extreme low tide.
Topography, Natural or Existing:
The surface including the relief and position of
natural or man made features of the lot, parcel, or tract of real property
immediately prior to any site preparation or grading, including excavation or filling.
Upland
: Generally the area above and landward of the Ordinary High Water
Mark.
10
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
Variance
: a permit for the limited purposes of granting relief to specific bulk,
dimensional, or performance standards set forth in the City’s Shoreline Master
Program.
Vessel
: A ship, boat, barge, or any other floating craft which is designed and
used for navigation and does not interfere with the normal public use of the
water.
WAC
: Washington Administrative Code.
Water Dependent Use
: A use or portion of a use which cannot exist in any other
location and is dependent on the water by reason of the intrinsic nature of its
operations. Examples of water-dependent uses may include cargo terminal
loading areas, ferry and passenger terminals, marinas, and sewer outfalls.
Water-Related Use
: A use or portion of a use which is not intrinsically dependent
on a waterfront location but whose operation cannot occur economically without a
shoreline location. Examples of water-related uses may include warehousing of
goods transported by water, seafood processing plants, or log storage. (Also see
Non-water-oriented Use.)
Water-Enjoyment Use:
A recreational use such as a park, pier, or other use
facilitating public access as a primary character of the use; or, a use that provides
for passive and active interaction of a large number of people with the shoreline for
leisure and enjoyment as a general character of the use and which, through
location, design and operation, assure the public's ability to interact with the
shoreline. In order to qualify as a water-enjoyment use, the use must be open to
the public and most if not all of the shoreline oriented space in the facility must be
devoted to the specific aspects of the use that foster shoreline interaction. Water-
enjoyment uses include, but are not limited to, restaurants, museums, and mixed-
use commercial, provided that such use conforms to the above requirements and
the provisions of the Master Program.
Water Oriented Use
: Any combination of water dependent, water related, and/or
water enjoyment uses. Non-water oriented serves to describe those uses which
have little or no relationship to the shoreline. Examples of non-water oriented
uses include professional office, automobile sales or repair shops, mini storage
facilities, multifamily residential development, department stores, and gas
stations.
Wetlands:
Areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or
groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under
normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted
for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes,
bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands
intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including, but not limited to,
11
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
éÔÍÊ×ÐÓÎ× ìÇÚÐÓÙ ûÙÙ×ÉÉ óÎÆ×ÎÈÍÊÃ
This document identifies existing and potential public shoreline access locations within the City. It
is formatted to provide area specific information with a summary of each geographical location, a
map, and photos. Improved public access can be achieved by the following:
1.Better utilization of existing City owned facilities. Existing underutilized City owned
property such as sewage pump stations and street ends located on the shoreline are
identified.
2.The Shoreline Master Program requires public access improvements on new commercial
development and redevelopment of commercial properties. This document identifies
locations within the City likely to be required to improve access.
3.The Shoreline Master Program requires improved access for new subdivisions of 4 or lots.
Locations where this type of development is possible in the future are identified. Due to the
density of existing lots along the shoreline this is not likely applicable in most areas.
The photos in this document are to be used as a aid to the reader, not all underutlized areas
are photographed. This document should be used to help guide neighborhood groups and City
Staff in understanding where improvement potential exists, what are some potential benefits,
and if any barriers are foreseeable.
íÉÈÊÓÙÔ úÛÃ
éÍÇÈÔ ÐÓÏÓÈ ÍÖ îÛÆÛÐ ÔÍÉÌÓÈÛÐ ÈÍ
ï×Ã×ÊÉ ÌÐÛÙ×
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Public access is limited in the Jackson Park Naval
Housing Community. While not gated these are
Federal lands, access is conditional and may be
denied at any time.
The area has a well lit paved trail system along the
shoreline which runs from the hospital through NAD
Park. The trail includes areas of second growth
forest and developed lawn areas.
Amenities include a covered picnic area, basketball
court, and play equipment.
The beach is accessible at multiple locations via
formal and informal connections.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
A formal agreement between the City and Navy
would ensure future civilian pedestrian access.
Public access could be improved at the
City owned pump stations within the Navy Facilities located at Dowell Rd and Root Ct.
Public information and education signage could be installed along the trail system.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Currently the Navy is not supportive of an agreement to allow civilians onto Navy Facilities due
to security issues.
øÍÅ×ÐÐ êØ ìÇÏÌ éÈÛÈÓÍÎ
ï
: Covered picnic table.
îÍÈ×É
Pedestrian path following
shoreline. Visual access to water.
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
Improvements to City Pump Stations would not be accessible by civillians without approval by
the Navy.
íÉÈÊÓÙÔ úÛÃ
îûø ïÛÊÓÎ× ìÛÊÑ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Within NAD Park the shoreline is in open space with an established second growth forest.
êÍÍÈ ùÍÇÊÈ ìÇÏÌ éÈÛÈÓÍÎ
There is continious public access via the trail system running paralell to the shoreline.
: Rough paved path. Visual
îÍÈ×É
Beach access is avaiable at multiple lecations via formal and informal connections.
access to water. Steep vegetated
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
bank.
There are opportunities for public information and educational programs and signage along the
trail system.
Park improvements could provide for increased public shoreline access and A.D.A. accessibility,
kayak launching areas, picnic benches, etc that would enhance the pedestrian environment.
íÉÈÊÓÙÔ úÛÃ
éÔÍÊ×ÅÍÍØ øÊ ÈÍ
øÊ ¦ èÓÌ ÍÖ ïÛØÊÍÎÛ ìÍÓÎÈ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
The area is developed with single-family residential uses with no current public access.
ïÛØÊÍÎÛ ìÍÓÎÈ ûÐÐ×ÃÉ å×ÉÈ ìÇÏÌ
There are two existing pump stations directly across from one another approximately half way
éÈÛÈÓÍÎ èÔ× ùÊÍÉÉÓÎÕ
up Madrona Point Drive called “The Crossing”. A photo of the west station is shown to the
: Steep, narrow access.
îÍÈ×É
right. The opposite pump station is addressed in the Oyster Bay section of this document.
Encroachment by adjacent residents.
Currently these pump stations do not provide public access.
Limited Views due to vegetation and
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
the pump station.
“The Crossing” pump stations could be
improved to provide pedestrian access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Vehicular access to “The Crossing” is extremely
limited as they are located on a narrow pice of
Right-of-Way and surrounded by private
property.Stairway is steep and may pose a
safety risk.
New public access locations are not likely due
to the existing built out development pattern of
the area.
íÃÉÈ×Ê úÛÃ
ïÛØÊÍÎÛ ìÈ ÈÍ
ðÍÅ×Ê
íÃÉÈ×Ê úÛà øÊ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
The area is developed with single-family
residential uses with no current public access.
There are two existing pump stations directly
across from one another approximately half way
up Madrona Point Drive called “The Crossing”. Currently these pump stations do not provide public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Should new commercial development or large scale re-development occur, improved public access will be required.
Improvements to “The Crossing could enhance pedestrian access on Madrona Point.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Existing lot sizes are typically too small in this area for new public access requirements to be triggered by subdivision.
Due to topography the East Pump Station of “The Crossing” may not provide physical access to the shoreline.
î
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
íÃÉÈ×Ê úÛÃ
öÊÍÏ ÚÇÈ ÎÍÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ
ðÍÅ×Ê íÃÉÈ×Ê úÛà øÊ ÈÍ
ñÓÈÉÛÌ åÛÃ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Developed with both residential and commercial uses, no current public access exists.
Existing pump station between the Oyster Bay Inn and the Flagship Inn does not provide public
access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
New commercial development and large scale re-development will require improved public
access.
ïÛØÊÍÎÛ ìÍÓÎÈ ûÐÐ×ÃÉ ÷ÛÉÈ ìÇÏÌ
The pump station located off of Kitsap Way between the Oyster Bay Inn and the Flagship Inn
éÈÛÈÓÍÎ èÔ× ùÊÍÉÉÓÎÕ
has potential for improved public access.
: Steep, stairway chained off.
îÍÈ×É
Encroachment by residents. Limited
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Views due to vegetation and the pump
Existing lot sizes are typically too small in this area for new public access requirements to be
triggered by subdivision.
station.
The pump station on Kitsap Way is severely limited by topography and traffic patterns. The site
has limited vehicular access, but is located in off a major arterial street.
íÃÉÈ×Ê úÛÃ
ñÓÈÉÛÌ åÛÃ ÈÍ ÛÎØ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ
ïÛÊÓÎ× øÊÓÆ×
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Developed with both residential and commercial uses and characterized by steep slopes.
An existing stairway adjacent to the Family Pancake House descends from Kitsap Way to
Oyster Bay Ct. which provides visual access, but does not reach the shoreline.
Street end of Forrest Avenue unimproved, steep and narrow.
íÃÉÈ×Ê úÛà éÈÛÓÊÉ
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
View from public stairs. No
Street end at Forrest Avenue could be improved to provide improved pedestrian access. îÍÈ×É
direct access to shoreline.
High probability of future commercial development and or redevelopment. Such development
will require improvements to public access.
Addition of benches along stairway would provide quality viewing.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Existing lot sizes are typically too small in this area for new public access requirements to be
triggered by subdivision.
Forrest Avenue Street end is limited by steep slopes and narrow street width. There is no
location for vehicular parking or turnaround. Additionally neighbors are possibly encroaching
into the Right-of-Way.
íÃÉÈ×Ê úÛà ¦
îÍÊÈÔ ÍÖ
ïÛÊÓÎ× øÊÓÆ× ÚÇÈ ÎÍÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÈÍ
ïÛÊÓÎ× øÊ ¦ èÓÌ ÍÖ
öÍÊÊ×ÉÈ ûÆ×ÎÇ× éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
ì×ÎÓÎÉÇÐÛ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Steep, narrow roadway
îÍÈ×É
The area is developed primarily with single-family residential uses with no current physical
descends from Kitsap Way to Oyster
public access.
Bay. Physical access to water.
Visual public access is provided from Marine Drive.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
The street end at Kelly Rd. could be improved to provide a viewing platform.
This portion of Marine Dr. could be preserved as a scenic drive.
Sidewalks, bike lanes and viewpoints could be provided at key locations along the Right-of-
Way.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Subdivisions of more than 4 lots require improved public access. Generally existing lot sizes
are too small in this area for such subdivisions, however there are some larger lot sizes in
ñ×ÐÐà êÍÛØéÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
Oyster Bay 6 where there is moderate potential for improved public access should large lots
subdivide.
Views from road. Low
îÍÈ×É
bank. Shoulder used informailly
for parking.
í
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
ïÇØ úÛÃ
ïÛÊÓÎ× øÊÓÆ× ÈÍ ïÛÈÔ×ÅÉ øÊ îå èÓÌ ÍÖ êÍÙÑà ìÈ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
The area is developed with single-family residential uses with no current public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
The street end at Older Avenue has legal access to State tidelands; therefore improvements are
possible at this location.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Existing lot sizes are typically too small in this area for new public access requirements to be
íÐØ×Ê ûÆ×
triggered by subdivision.
Thick trees and
îÍÈ×É
The street end at Older Avenue is heavily forested and is on a steep slope. Access is not likely
vegetation. No access to water.
in this location due to the sensitivity of the resources.
Steep slope. High bank.
ìÔÓÎÎ×à úÛÃ
ïÛÈÔ×ÅÉ øÊ îå ÈÍ
ãÛÙÔÈ ôÛÆ×Î åÃ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
The area is developed with single-family
residential uses with no current public
access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Subdivisions of more than 4 lots require
improved public access. Existing lot sizes
vary, should larger lots subdivide into more
than 4 lots, improved public access will be
required.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Subdivision of more than 4 lots is currently
unlikely as this area is not serviced by City
sewer. Lot sizes required for lots not
serviced by sewer will severely limit
subdivision density.
ìÔÓÎÎ×à úÛÃ
ãÛÙÔÈ ôÛÆ×Î åÛÃ
úÊ×Ï×ÊÈÍÎ ãÛÙÔÈ ùÐÇÚ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
No current public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Expansion of the yacht club could trigger improved public access requirements. Additionally
WAC 332-30-131(5) provides an incentive of reduced rent on aquatic lands where public access
is provided.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Redevelopment is unlikely in the immediate future.
(
4105
ìÔÓÎÎ×à úÛÃ
îå ñ×ÎÎ×Øà øÊ ÈÍ
îå ìÔÓÎÎ×à úÛà êØ óÎÙÐÇØ× éÔÛÅ óÉÐÛÎØ
èÔ éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
The area is developed with single-family residential uses with no current physical public access.
Steep bank, vegetation blicks
îÍÈ×É
Scenic views along most of Phinney Bay Drive.
views. Development between road and
shoreline.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Phinney Bay Dr could be preserved as a scenic drive. Sidewalks, Trails, bike lanes, and viewpoints should be provided
on the public right-of-way.
ì
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Existing lot sizes are typically too small in this area for new public access requirements to be
triggered by subdivision.
ìÔÓÎÎ×à úÛÃ
îå ìÔÓÎÎ×à úÛà êØ ÈÍ
î ðÛÖÛÃ×ÈÈ× ûÆ×ÎÇ×
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
The area is developed with single-family residential uses with no current public access.
÷ ìÔÓÎÎ×à øÊÓÆ× ìÇÏÌ éÈÛÈÓÍÎ
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Phinney Bay Dr could be preserved as a scenic drive. Sidewalks, Trails, bike lanes, and
Low bank. Informal access
îÍÈ×É
viewpoints should be provided on the public right-of-way.
to water. Residential
The E. Phinney Bay pump station has high potential for public access improvement.
encroachments.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Existing lot sizes are typically too small in
this area for new public access
requirements to be triggered by subdivision.
th
The 26 Street end has low potential for
public access as it is highly vegetated and
is on a steep bank.
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
th
2710 N Lafayette Ave to 2304 19 Street
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
The area is developed with single-family
residential uses which do not provide
public access.
Public access improvements are required
and planned for the Waterside Lane
Development.
Limited public access at intersection of 25 th
and Snyder Avenue at the City pump
station.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Improvements to pump station on Snyder Avenue could improve pedestrian access.
Public access adjacent to the shoreline for Waterside Lane will be improved as project
develops.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Existing lot sizes are typically too small in this area for new public access requirements to be
triggered by subdivision.
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
îÛÆÛÐ ûÆ× ÈÍ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ ûÌÈÉ ¦ ûÎØ×ÊÉÍÎ
ùÍÆ×
éÎÃØ×Ê ûÆ×ÎÇ× ìÇÏÌ éÈÛÈÓÍÎ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
The area is developed with single-family residential uses which do not provide public access.
Low bank. Informal access to
îÍÈ×É
Undeveloped Street end at Olympic.
water. Possible residential
th
City owned property at 2310, 2314, 2316, and 2320 19 Street, homes have recently been
encroachments.
demolished, property is vacant.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Street ends on Olympic Ave could be improved to provide pedestrian public access.
Sidewalks, bike lanes and viewing platforms may be developed on the right-of-way to provide
for greater public enjoyment.
íÐÃÏÌÓÙ ûÆ× éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
ë
Low bank. Poor aesthetic of
îÍÈ×É
building and landscaping. Residential
encroachments.
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
th
The City owned property at 2310, 2314, 2316, and 2320 19 Street are planned to be improved
by the Parks Department to provide a recreational facility and public beach access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Existing lot sizes are typically too small in this area for new public access requirements to be
triggered by subdivision.
èÔÍÏÌÉÍÎ ûÆ× éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
1805 Thompson - Port Washington Marina
Ajacent to marina. Steep
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
îÍÈ×É
bank. No existing public access.
No public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Expansion of the marina could trigger improved public access requirements. Additionally WAC
332-30-131(5) provides an incentive of reduced rent on aquatic lands where public access is
provided.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Redevelopment is unlikely in the immediate future.
ùÔ×ÉÈ×Ê ûÆ× éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
èÔÍÏÌÉÍÎ ûÆ× ÈÍ åÛÊÊ×Î ûÆ× úÊÓØÕ×
Steep bank. Nice view.
îÍÈ×É
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Encroachment by single-family uses.
Industrial and single-family residential development. Informal public access at High Ave and Ohio
Directly adjacent to to Olympic
Avenue.
College.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
There are several opportunities for improved access at street ends locations such as Thompson
Ave, Pennsylvania Ave, High Avenue, Ohio Avenue, and Chester Avenue and the pump station on
Ohio Avenue.
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
úÍÈÔ ÉÓØ×É åÛÊÊ×Î úÊÓØÕ× êÍÈÍæÓÉÈÛ ìÛÊÑ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Roto-Vista Park offers 130 linear feet of shoreline access with some amenities and limited on-
street parking
Excellent vistas of Port Washington Narrows, limited physical access.
ì×ÎÎÉÃÐÆÛÎÓÛ ûÆ×
éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Steep bank. Rugged informal
Park improvements should include increasing vehicular access and A.D.A. accessibility.
îÍÈ×É
footpath. Overgrown. Ajacent to
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
industrial.
åÛÊÊ×Î ûÆ× úÊÓØÕ× ÈÍ
ìÛÊÑ øÊ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Multi-family and single-family development with no formal public access provided on private
parcels.
Informal pedestrian access is available along the parking lot between Elizabeth Avenue and Park
Avenue.
Park Avenue street end provides informal public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
More formal facilities could be developed at existing City owned parcels. Improvements to such
parcels are wide ranging.
ôÓÕÔ ûÆ× éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
÷Æ×ÊÕÊ××Î ìÛÊÑ
Moderate/Low bank. Informal
îÍÈ×É
footpath to beach.Clear View.
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Evergreen Rotary Park includes 1,900 feet of visual and physical shoreline access and includes: a group shelter, picnic
shelters and tables, BBQs and a boat launch.
ê
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
The future waterfront connectivity project may traverse the public tide or aquatic lands in this area
from the Turner Joy to Evergreen Park.
Future additions to the park could increase public access. The City owns the property to the
northeast of the park and has preliminary plans for such improvements.
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
÷Æ×ÊÕÊ××Î ìÛÊÑ ÈÍ ïÛÎ×ÈÈ× úÊÓØÕ×
íÔÓÍ ûÆ× éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ ìÇÏÌ
éÈÛÈÓÍÎ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Utility access. Clear View.
îÍÈ×É
Multi-family district currently developed in single-family use with no existing physical access.
Beach accessible.Gentle bank.
Existing views from roads.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
The future waterfront connectivity project may traverse the public tide or aquatic lands in this area
from the Turner Joy to Evergreen Park.
Street end at 11 th Place St.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Steep bank, high density, developed area provides a limited area for improvements.
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
úÍÈÔ ÉÓØ×É ÍÖ ÈÔ× ïÛÎ×ÈÈ× úÊÓØÕ×
ìÛÊÑ ûÆ× éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
No current public access.
Steep bank. Clear view of
îÍÈ×É
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
water.
Replacement of the Manette Bridge have provided opportunity for public access in the location of
the old bridge. Steep slopes and limited vehicular access will minimize the scope for this site;
however substantial opportunity for improvement is available.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Steep bank, high density, developed area provides a limited area for improvements.
å×ÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
ïÛÎ×ÈÈ× úÊÓØÕ× ÈÍ
åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ ûÆ×
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
ÈÔ
úÊÓØÕ×ÌÍÊÈ ä éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
Existing multifamily development on steep bank waterfront with no public access.
Small street adjacet to the
îÍÈ×É
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
bridge. Steep bank. No physical or
The future waterfront connectivity project may traverse the public tide or aquatic lands in this area
visual access. Private garage may
from the Turner Joy to Evergreen Park.
encroach.
Redevelopment is likely for many of these lots, which would require improved public access.
6 th Street connection to shoreline should be provided and is shown in existing Land Use
applications.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Steep bank, high density, developed area provides a limited area for improvements.
éÓÎÙÐÛÓÊ óÎÐ×È
ÈÔ
éÈÊ××È ÈÍ ìÇÕ×È éÍÇÎØ îÛÆÛÐ éÔÓÌÃÛÊØ
ÈÔ ìÐÛÙ× éÈ éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
High bank. Think bramble.
îÍÈ×É
There is a large public marina between the Ferry Terminal and Burwell Street in conjunction with a
Great view. Some room for parking.
waterfront plaza that provides extensive public access.
Louis Mentor Boardwalk and southerly ferry terminal.
Bremerton Fountain Park between the shipyard and ferry terminal.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Public access trail could be provided running parallel to the shore.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
High density, developed area provides a limited area for improvements.
éÓÎÙÐÛÓÊ óÎÐ×È ¦øÍÅÎÈÍÅÎ
úÊ×Ï×ÊÈÍÎ
é
Densely developed with several
îÍÈ×É
public access points.
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
éÓÎÙÐÛÓÊ óÎÐ×È
ìÇÕ×È éÍÇÎØ îÛÆÛÐ éÔÓÌÃÛÊØ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Heavy industrial ship yard
Public access is not appropriate due to
hazards and national security concerns.
éÓÎÙÐÛÓÊ óÎÐ×È
ìÇÕ×È éÍÇÎØ îÛÆÛÐ éÔÓÌÃÛÊØ
ÚÍÇÎØÛÊà ÈÍ ÚÇÈ ÎÍÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ éê å×ÉÈ
õÍÊÉÈ ùÊ××Ñ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
The shoreline in this area is bounded by the
US Navy Railroad, SR 3, and SR 304.
The majority of the shoreline consists of rock
rip-rap. There is no formal public access to
this area.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Future development of the “Mosquito Fleet
Trial” could improve access. This could
include bike lanes and pedestrian paths to
connect Bremerton and Port Orchard.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Highly developed with industrial uses and Highway severely limit public access opportunities.
éÓÎÙÐÛÓÊ óÎÐ×È
ìÇÕ×È éÍÇÎØ îÛÆÛÐ éÔÓÌÃÛÊØ ÚÍÇÎØÛÊà ÈÍ ÚÇÈ ÎÍÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ éê å×ÉÈ õÍÊÉÈ ùÊ××Ñ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Commercial Development in the area along the Gorst Estuary.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Future development of the “Mosquito Fleet Trial” could improve access. This could include bike lanes and pedestrian paths
to connect Bremerton and Port Orchard.
Redevelopment of properties would require a public access trail along the shoreline that ensures connectivity between
properties.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Highly developed and Highway severely limit public access opportunities.
éÓÎÙÐÛÓÊ óÎÐ×È
éê éå
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
This is the Sinclair Inlet Wildlife Area, a Kitsap County Park extending about 1,000 feet along SR 16 with a cove on the
Gorst Estuary. Public access includes a wildlife viewing platform.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Ideally this area will remain a wildlife area. Access and parking are limited due to the proximity to SR 16.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Public access is limited due to the proximity to the highway and high sensitivity of habitat on site.
éÓÎÙÐÛÓÊ óÎÐ×È
÷ÐÛÎØÛÎ õÛÊØ×ÎÉ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Elandan Gardens is a private nursery, informal public access is provided during business hours. No formal public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Redevelopment could require a public access trail along the shoreline that ensures connectivity between properties.
è
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Access is limited due to proximity to the highway.
÷ÛÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
êÓØØ×ÐÐ êÍÛØ ÈÍ
èÊÛÙÃÈÍÎ ú×ÛÙÔ êØ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Rural single-family residential
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Opportunity for public access exists should
larger lots subdivide.
÷ÛÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
êÓØØ×ÐÐ êÍÛØ ÈÍ
èÊÛÙÃÈÍÎ ú×ÛÙÔ êØ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Tracyton Beach Rd offers a scenic drive.
Pat Carey Vista provides amenities and views.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Opportunity for public access exists should
larger lots subdivide.
Tracyton Beach Road could be declared a
scenic drive.
Trails or sidewalks and viewpoints could be provided on the public right-of-way.
Street end at Sheridan Rd. has some improvement potential.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Areas that are encumbered by high bluffs may not be able to provide physical access without
damaging the steep slopes. Access should not adversely affect sensitive intertidal areas.
÷ÛÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
éÔ×ÊÓØÛÎ êÍÛØ ÈÍ
éÈ×ÌÔ×ÎÉÍÎ ûÆ×
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
éÔ×ÊÓØÛÎ êØ éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
Lions Park provides public access along the shoreline and to the beach with many amenities
available to the public.
Nice view. Heavy traffic flow.
îÍÈ×É
Very close to Lyons park.Private
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Park improvements and ecological restoration measures are encouraged.
The street end at Stephenson Avenue is directly adjacent to Lyons Park, has ample room for
improved access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
There is ample existing public access in this location, new access at pump stations may not be
necessary.
÷ÛÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
éÈ×ÌÔ×ÎÉÍÎ ûÆ× éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
2506 Stephenson Ave to Sheridan Park
Chain link fence around a large
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
îÍÈ×É
portion of Lyons field.
This reach includes a city utility facility, multi-family development, and Lent’s Landing Park. A
more formal pedestrian connection could be provided between Lions Park and the City’s utility
facility.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Public access to the parks should be maintained, but may be modified in the future in conjunction
with ecological restoration measures.
÷ÛÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
éÔ×ÊÓØÛÎ ìÛÊÑ åÛÊÊ×Î úÊÓØÕ× èÔ×ÛÈ×Ê
ç
ð×Î黃 ðÛÎØÓÎÕ éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
Water access, large lawn,
îÍÈ×É
gazebo, benches,parking, bus shed.
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Single-family and multi-family use, Sheridan Park, and the Bremerton Community Theater on a City owned parcel.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Public access to the water below the bluff could be provided.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Public access should be avoided in cases where damage to the steep slopes is likely and where it
would adversely affect sensitive intertidal areas.
÷ÛÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
(
ïÛÓÎ éÈ æÓ×Å ìÍÓÎÈ
ùÛÏÌÚ×ÐÐ åÛà ÈÍ
åÔ×ÛÈÍÎ åÛÃ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Informal Pathway to beach.
îÍÈ×É
City-owned utility facility on the south side of the bridge
Steep access to beach.
Multi-family and commercial uses on Campbell Way and Wheaton Avenue.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
There is an unopened street end at Main Street north of the Campbell Way/Wheaton Way
intersection that provides the potential for a marine access and viewpoint.
Potential Barriers:
Main Street end is a steeply sloped area. Parking is limited.
÷ÛÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
(
÷ÛÉÈ ÍÖ
åÔ×ÛÈÍÎ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ïÛÎ×ÈÈ× úÊÓØÕ×
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
ÈÔ
éÈ××È ÷ÎØ
Domstad Park, in conjunction with open space on both sides of the Manette Bridge, provides a
public viewpoint.
High bank with steep slope. Great
îÍÈ×É
view.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Street ends at 16 th St and Marlow Avenue could be improved to provide pedestrian access to the
shoreline.
Improved access opportunities in the location of the Old Manette Bridge.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Steep slope and high density limit area for pedestrian access.
÷ÛÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
(
ïÛÎ×ÈÈ× úÊÓØÕ× ÚÍÈÔ ÉÓØ×É
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Visual access to the water is provided.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
ïÛÊÐÍÅ ûÆ×ÎÇ×÷ÎØ
New Manette Bridge will provide bike lane and improved sidewalk width.
Improvements are likely to occur on both sides of the bridge.
Great view. Well landscaped.
îÍÈ×É
Likely kept up by an adjacent land
÷ÛÉÈ ìÍÊÈ åÛÉÔÓÎÕÈÍÎ îÛÊÊÍÅÉ
(
ïÛÎ×ÈÈ× úÊÓØÕ× ÈÍ
éÔÍÊ× øÊ
owner.
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Retail, restaurant and multi-family uses. A pier is provided at The Boat Shed Restaurant.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
A continuous walkway along the shoreline could be provided at the time these parcels redevelop.
Piers on public aquatic lands also could provide public access.
Pump station on Lebo Blvd just south of the Warren Ave Bridge.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
The shoreline is densely developed, new access points are unlikely.
ïð
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
ìÍÊÈ íÊÙÔÛÊØ úÛÃ
(215 Shore Drive to 711 Shore Drive
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Single-family residential.
Developed street ends at 9 th St and Hayward
Avenue providing public access.
Existing visual access from Upper Shore
Drive.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Upper Shore Drive could be preserved as a
scenic drive with a trail or sidewalks and
viewpoints provided on the public right-of-way.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
The shoreline is densely developed, new
access points are unlikely.
ìÍÊÈ íÊÙÔÛÊØ úÛÃ
(805 Shore Drive to 1151
Shore Drive)
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Lots developed with Single-family residential use.
Bachman Park at the Trenton Ave street end provides visual and physical access.
Jennifer’s Hill Climb at street end of 11 th Street and Trenton Avenue.
Views from Upper Shore Drive
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Improvements to existing facilities such as public amenities for pedestrians.
Upper Shore Drive could be preserved as a scenic drive.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
The shoreline is densely developed, new access points are unlikely.
ìÍÊÈ íÊÙÔÛÊØ úÛÃ
òÛÙÍÚÉÍÎ úÐÆØ ÈÍ
î÷ ÷Î×ÈÛÓ ú×ÛÙÔ êØ
ÈÔ
ûÆ×ÎÇ× éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Small picnic area, parking, and
îÍÈ×É
Developed with single family residences with no existing public access.
beach access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Jacobson Blvd could be preserved as a scenic drive.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
The shoreline is densely developed, new access points are unlikely.
ìÍÊÈ íÊÙÔÛÊØ úÛÃ
î÷ ÷ÎÛÈÛÓ ú×ÛÙÔ êØ ÈÍ ÚÇÈ ÎÍÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ úÛÔÓÛ æÓÉÈÛ øÊÓÆ×
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Largely undeveloped. No current public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
ôÛÃÅÛÊØ ûÆ×ÎÇ× éÈÊ××È÷ÎØ
Largely undeveloped, when development occurs public access should include a trail eventually
Pump station predominates site.
connecting to Illahee State Park
îÍÈ×É
Access to water. Great view.
ìÍÊÈ íÊÙÔÛÊØ úÛÃ
(
úÛÔÓÛ æÓÉÈÛ øÊÓÆ× ÈÍ óÐÐÛÔ×× éÈÛÈ× ìÛÊÑ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Single-family residential. No current public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Small lot size within single-family residential area. If development occurs public access should include a trail eventually
connecting to Illahee State Park.
ïï
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Coordination of trail system.
õÍÊÉÈ ùÊ××Ñ
(
éÓÎÙÐÛÓÊ óÎÐ×È ÈÍ éê
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Undeveloped on the left bank, developed
commercial use on the right bank.
No formal public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Future redevelopment will likely require
improved public access.
Trail system running parallel to the shoreline
should be included in public access for each
project.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Coordination of trail system.
õÍÊÉÈ ùÊ××Ñ
éê ÈÍ éÛÏ ùÔÊÓÉÈÍÌÔ×ÊÉÍÎ
ûÆ×ÎÇ×
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Commercial and Industrial use.
No formal public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
A shoreline public access path could be created when redevelopment occurs that ensures
connectivity with other properties.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Coordination of trail system.
õÍÊÉÈ ùÊ××Ñ
éÛÏ ùÔÊÓÉÈÍÌÔ×ÊÉÍÎ ûÆ×ÎÇ× ÈÍ å ú×ÐÖÛÓÊ æÛÐÐ×à êØ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Single-family residential, however, zoned for more intense purposes.
õÍÊÉÈ ùÊ××Ñ
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Fish Habitat enhancement
îÍÈ×É
A shoreline public access path should be created when redevelopment occurs that ensures
project in Jarstad Park.
connectivity with other properties.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Coordination of trail system.
õÍÊÉÈ ùÊ××Ñ
å ú×ÐÖÛÓÊ æÛÐÐ×à êØ ÈÍ ÌÍÅ×Ê ÐÓÎ× ×ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈ ôÛÈÙÔ×Êà ÓÎ íÈÈÍ òÛÊÉÈÛØ ìÛÊÑ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Developed portions of Otto Jarstad Park offer public access as well as access and educational programs at the fish
hatchery.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Park improvements could include formal access that recognizes sensitive features of the stream.
õÍÊÉÈ ùÊ××Ñ
ìÍÅ×Ê ÐÓÎ× ×ÛÉ×Ï×ÎÈ ÓÎ íÈÈÍ òÛÊÉÈÛØ ìÛÊÑ ÈÍ ×ÎØ ÍÖ ÉÔÍÊ×ÐÓÎ× ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Undeveloped portions of Otto Jarstad Park provide Informal access to the shoreline.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Park improvements could include formal access that recognizes sensitive features of the stream.
ïî
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
ñÓÈÉÛÌ ðÛÑ×
(
éÍÇÈÔ ÉÓØ× ÍÖ ÐÛÑ× ÈÍ ìÊÓÙ× êØ ñÓÈÉÛÌ ðÛÑ× ìÛÊÑ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Kitsap Lake Park includes both active recreation areas
and a large natural area consisting of a large wetland
complex. The active portion of the park provides public
access along the shoreline.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Additional interpretive trails and boardwalks may be
developed in the wetland area, to the extent that they
protect ecologically important resources.
ñÓÈÉÛÌ ðÛÑ×
(
÷ÛÉÈ×ÊÐà ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ñÓÈÉÛÌ ðÛÑ× ìÛÊÑ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Single-family residential. No current public access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Unlikely possibility of future public access due to
existing small lot sizes.
Pump stations on Price Rd, Cedarwood Dr, and Chico
Way all have the potential to be improved to provide pedestrian access.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Pump stations are small and will likely have limited or no parking.
ñÓÈÉÛÌ ðÛÑ×
(
ìÐÛÈÈ×Ø ñÓÈÉÛÌ ðÛÑ×
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Single-family residential
Informal public access to the shoreline at the end of Francis Street.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Street end at Francis St Could be expanded. ìÊÓÙ× êÍÛØ ìÇÏÌ éÈÛÈÓÍΦñÓÈÉÛÌ
ðÛÑ× ìÛÊÑ
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Ample parking, restrooms, picnic
New public access locations are unlikely due to density of existing neighborhood.
îÍÈ×É
tables, visual and physical access to
ñÓÈÉÛÌ ðÛÑ×
(
water.
ñÓÈÉÛÌ ðÛÑ× êØ îÛÆà ¦ ùÛÏÌ ïÙñ×ÛÎ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Navy Park provides public access along the shoreline and to the beach however it is limited to
naval personnel.
Department of Fish & Wildlife Boat Launch provides physical and visual access with picnic tables
and bathrooms, however park fees apply.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
Subdivisions of more than 4 lots require improved public access. Existing lot sizes vary, should
larger lots subdivide into more than 4 lots, new public access will be required.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
The Navy is unlikely to offer access to civilians due to security risks.
ùÔÓÙÍ åÛÃìÇÏÌ éÈÛÈÓÍÎ
Low bank. Access to water. Great
îÍÈ×É
access to shoreline. Very close to
neighboring residences.
ïí
߬¬¿½¸³»²¬×××
ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ ÍÖ öÓÉÔ åÓÐØÐÓÖ×
öÊÛÎÙÓÉ éÈÊ××È ÷ÎØ
ù×ØÛÊÅÍÍØ øÊÓÆ× ìÇÏÌ éÈÛÈÓÍÎ
úÍÛÈ ÐÛÇÎÙÔ
Low bank. Paved to beach.
Low bank. Beach inaccessible
îÍÈ×É
îÍÈ×É
Boat launch, bathroom, parking,
Parking. Could be improved with minimal
îÍÈ×É
due to fencing. Could be improved with
visual and physical access.
costs.
minal costs.
çÎÓÍÎ êÓÆ×Ê ê×É×ÊÆÍÓÊ
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Undeveloped open space. Public access is prohibited.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
None.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
Public access presents a safety concern to the City’s water
supply. State and Federal regulations prohibit public access
in this location.
èÅÓÎ ðÛÑ×É
ùÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ùÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎ
Undeveloped open space. Public access is prohibited.
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ óÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ
None
ìÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ úÛÊÊÓ×ÊÉ
This is a surface expression of the aquifer. There are
several State and federal regulations for watershed
protections that prohibit public access to this location.
ïì
Attachment II
October 6, 2011
Version 2
irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities,
wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those
wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result
of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands include artificial
wetlands created from non-wetland areas to mitigate the conversion of wetlands.
12