HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/15/2011 PACKET(DRAFT) AGENDA
Regular Meeting - Bremerton Planning Commission
(Subject to PC approval)
March 15, 2011
5:30 P.M.
th
345 – 6Street
Meeting Chamber – First Floor
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL (quorum present)
III. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
IVAPPROVAL OF MINUTES:
February 15, 2011 Regular meeting.
o
V. PUBLIC MEETING
A. Call to the Public:
Public comments on any item not on tonight’s agenda
B. Public Hearing
1. Continued Public Hearing to A
mend BMC 20.42 entitled “Definitions” and
related to electric vehicle
BMC 20.48 entitled “Off-Street Parking Requirements”
infrastructure.
C. Workshop
1. Shoreline Master Program Update – Overview of shoreline designations.
VI. BUSINESS MEETING
A. Chair Report:
Chairman Hoell
B. Director Report:
Andrea Spencer.
C.Old Business:
D.New Business
VII.ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is
April 19, 2011
Planning Commission meeting packets are available on-line at
www.ci.bremerton.wa.us
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 3/15/11
Minutes for
City of Bremerton Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
February 15, 2011
I. Call to Order
Chairman Hoell
The meeting was called to order by at 5:30 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Those present were: Commissioner Cockburn, Commissioner Jose, Commissioner Mosiman,
Commissioner Streissguth, Commissioner Tift, Commissioner Warren, and Chairman Hoell.
Quorum certified.
Also present: Andrea Spencer, Lindsey Sehmel, and Pam Bykonen (DCD staff).
III. Approval of Agenda
Chairman HoellA motion was made by Commissioner Jose and
introduced the agenda.
seconded by Commissioner Cockburn to approve the agenda as presented
. It was agreed by
general consensus to approve the agenda as presented.
IV. Approval of Minutes
The minutes of the Regular Meeting held on January 18, 2011 were presented for approval by
A motion was made by Commissioner Streissguth and seconded by
Chairman Cockburn.
Commissioner Tift to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of January 18, 2011 as
presented.
Called for a vote: Commissioner Cockburn: Yes; Commissioner Jose: Abstain;
Commissioner Mosiman: Abstain; Commissioner Streissguth: Yes; Commissioner Tift: Yes;
Commissioner Warren: Abstain; Chairman Hoell: Yes. The motion carried.
VI. Public Meeting
A.Call To The Public.
(public comments on any item not on tonight’s agenda)
Chairman Hoell
asked if there were any comments from citizens. Seeing none, she
closed this portion of the meeting.
1.Workshop and Public Hearing –Zoning Code Amendment: Lindsey Sehmel, City
Planner
, gave a brief PowerPoint presentation on the topic of amending the Bremerton
Municipal Code chapter 20.48 titled “Off-Street Parking Requirements” relating to
electric vehicle infrastructure within the city. During the 2009 legislative cycle,
Washington State adopted House Bill 1481 which requires by July 2011 all growth
Planning Commission Meeting February 15, 2011 Page 1 of 5
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 3/15/11
management cities and cities along major transportation routes to allow for electric
vehicle infrastructure within their city limits in all zones except residential and city
resource lands, specifically, zones where automobile oriented services are currently
located. This requirement is compatible with the City of Bremerton’s comprehensive
plan Transportation element. Minor amendments to the zoning code would achieve the
State’s requirements for electric vehicle infrastructure availability. The amendments
would include:
Amending existing definitions for Automobile Service & Repair, Gas Station, and
¥
Transportation Facility;
Adding new definitions for Battery Charging Station, Battery Exchange Station,
¥
Electric Vehicle Charging Station, Electric Vehicle Infrastructure, and Rapid
Charging Station; and
Including a new sub-section to BMC 20.48, Off-Street Parking Requirements, to
¥
allow charging stations in parking lots that are within an approved zone. All
charging stations would have to comply with City building codes and Labor and
Industry (L&I) electrical codes.
Lindsey
noted that the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) and the Department of
Commerce had created an educational packet for communities to refer to while
undergoing this adoption process; Bremerton’s approach was within these guidelines.
Commissioner Cockburn
asked about Level II (private) charging stations in residential
zones. Lindsey said that private use charging stations were allowed in residential areas;
Andrea
the proposed amendments would affect commercial properties and uses.
Spencer, Director of Community Development
, added that charging stations for private
use is considered an accessory use to the property and would only require electrical
permits.
Commissioner Streissguth
commented that the proposed amendments seemed to be a
“minimalist” approach and felt that the Commission should be more aware of the
guidelines set forth in the PSRC packet which she then passed out to the commissioners
to review.
Commissioner Streissguth
asked if automobile dealerships would be included with
automobile services and repair because it was feasible that a dealership that sells only
used cars would not necessarily have service bays but may want to have charging
Lindsey
stations. said that if the dealership was in an allowed zone, charging stations
Commissioner Jose
would be considered an allowed use. asked if that would include
Lindsey
the rapid charging stations. said that rapid charging stations would be allowed
where gas stations are allowed. Commissioner Jose posed the scenario of the used car
Andrea
dealership installing a rapid charging station. stated that, as in the residential
zones, charging stations are an accessory use to the primary use and in the near future it
will be customary to have charging stations in conjunction with other auto-oriented
services.
Andrea added that limited staff resources have necessitated taking a “minimalist”
approach in order to be in compliance with the State’s regulations by the deadline of July
Planning Commission Meeting February 15, 2011 Page 2 of 5
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 3/15/11
1, 2011. A more in-depth approach will be included with larger code amendments at a
future date.
Commissioner Tift
asked if charging stations would be allowed at restaurants, such as
Anthony’s as an amenity to the restaurants customers, or in any parking structure.
Lindsey
said it would be allowed as part of the amendments to off-street parking as long
as it is an allowed use in an allowed zone.
Commissioner Jose
questioned the differences in the amendments to definitions,
specifically why services such as electric battery exchange were not allowed at all of the
facilities listed. Lindsey explained that battery exchange facilities can be quite large;
Commissioner Cockburn
added that there is a safety issue when exchanging batteries
and is too dangerous to have in a gas station because of sparking.
Chairman Hoell
expressed concern of limiting a business owner’s ability to grow and
run their facility by limiting what type of electric vehicle service they can provide.
CommissionerStreissguth
expressed discomfort at approving the proposed amendments
without more detailed information regarding safety and other specifics of installing
Commissioner Mosiman
electric vehicle services. stated that public safety was beyond
the responsibilities of a Planning Commission, but noted that there was quite of lot of
information contained in the PSRC guidelines and it could not be adequately covered in
one meeting. He acknowledged that there are times when a deadline is imminent it is
necessary to adopt a “bare bones” proposal as a holding place so the requirement is
technically met. Commissioner Mosiman asked where the concept and language
Lindsey
contained in the proposed amendments originated from. said the language,
specifically the new sub-section to BMC 20.48, came from the PSRC guidelines. The
amendments to the definitions was a result of staff analysis of existing zones and uses
and what would be the most appropriate locations for electric vehicle services.
Commissioner Jose
felt that the Commission should be open to many electric vehicle
service location possibilities in the interest of encouraging entrepreneurship within the
city.
Commissioner Tift
asked if any permits for charging stations had been approved.
Andrea
said that there have been no proposals submitted, but noted that businesses such
as the Nissan dealership would not need a building permit, only an electrical permit
through L&I because a charging station is an accessory use. She added that the zoning
code does not regulate safety measures; those standards are set through building, fire, and
electrical codes.
Commissioner Tift
asked to what businesses or locations desiring charging stations as a
Andrea
secondary use would the proposed amendments apply. explained that the
amendments were to clarify the zones that allow car related services would also allow
electric vehicle related services. For example, even though the Manette Center Core
(MCC) has a commercial element, auto-oriented services are not allowed, therefore,
electric vehicle charging stations or battery exchange facilities are not allowed.
Planning Commission Meeting February 15, 2011 Page 3 of 5
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 3/15/11
Commissioner Warren
asked how long a Director’s interpretation would take to make a
Andrea
decision on where electric vehicle services could be located. said it would take
about two weeks and she would use the proposed zoning codes included in the
amendment as a guide to what is most compatible.
Commissioner Mosiman
acknowledged the need to adopt the proposed amendments to
the zoning code to be compliant with the State, but asked for more time to truly
understand what the impacts on the community would be.
Commissioner Streissguth
asked about allowing charging stations in parking areas in
the public right-of-way. Andrea explained that the zoning code has been developed to
regulate private property and does not have authority over public right-of-way. She
added that charging stations could be allowed in the public right-of-way but the zoning
code would not be the governing document.
Commissioner Streissguth
requested staff verify the accuracy of the Washington
Administrative Code (WAC) cited in the proposed amendments and to provide additional
information on ADA accessibility and public safety for charging stations within parking
structures.
Several commissioners felt that additional information regarding allowed locations,
design guidance, and Planning Commission authority was needed before this item could
be put to a vote. Staff will provide the commissioners with the link to the PSRC website
page that contains the electric vehicle guidelines.
Commissioner Cockburn
commented that much of what was included in the proposed
amendments dealt with technology that has yet to be fully developed which will allow
time to make changes if needed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Streissguth and seconded by Commissioner
Jose to continue the Public Hearing to amend BMC 20.42 and 20.48 to the March
15, 2011 meeting.
Called for a vote: Commissioner Cockburn: Yes; Commissioner
Jose: Yes; Commissioner Mosiman: Yes; Commissioner Streissguth: Yes;
Commissioner Tift: Yes; Commissioner Warren: Yes; Chairman Hoell: Yes. The
motion carried.
VI. Business Meeting
A.Chairman’s Report:None
.
B.Director’s Report: Andrea Spencer, Director of Community Development,
reported
that the Shoreline Master Program shoreline designations will be presented to the
Commission at the March 15, 2011 meeting.
There will be open houses for the Pacific Avenue Redevelopment project on February
th
17 and the SKIA Sub-Area Plan in April.
Kelli Warren
Andrea welcomed as the newest member of the Planning Commission.
Planning Commission Meeting February 15, 2011 Page 4 of 5
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 3/15/11
C.Old Business:None
D.New Business:
Commissioner Streissguth asked about having the Commissioners attend
the Department of Commerce’s short course on planning law. Staff will research when
and where the next available course will take place.
VII. Adjournment
Meeting was adjourned at 6:24 p.m. The next Regular Meeting is scheduled for March 15, 2011.
Respectfully submitted by:
_______________________________________
Andrea L. Spencer, AICP, Executive Secretary
Approved by:
_______________________________________
Lois Hoell, Chairman
Planning Commission Meeting February 15, 2011 Page 5 of 5
Commission Meeting Date: March 15, 2011 Agenda Item: V.B.1
CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TITLE:
Public Hearing for Zoning Code amendments
Electric vehicle infrastructure
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development
PRESENTED BY:
Andrea L. Spencer, AICP, Director of Community Development
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On February 15, 2011 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
amendments to the City’s Zoning Code (Bremerton Municipal Code Title 20). As
drafted and proposed by staff, the amendments presented to the Commission would
bring the City’s code into conformance with the minimum requirements of SSHB 1481
and RCW 35A.63.107, which requires the city to allow electric vehicle infrastructure in
nearly all the city’s zoning districts.
The Commission considered the information presented, asked several clarifying
questions of staff, and determined that additional information was necessary before the
Commission could formulate a recommendation for code changes to the City Council.
The Commission made a motion to continue the public hearing to March 15, 2011, at
which time it was expected that additional information would be provided.
The Department of Community Development has experienced staff changes over the
past couple of weeks, and as a result, this work item has not been completed for the
Commission. I recommend the following:
1) Open the continued public hearing, receive any additional public
testimony, and close the public hearing.
2) Provide any additional feedback to staff of the specific information you
require so that you may formulate a recommendation to the City Council on
these amendments.
Staff will schedule this as a future item for Planning Commission discussion and will
publish a new public hearing legal advertisement.
Commission Meeting Date: March 15, 2011 Agenda Item: V.C.1
CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA TITLE:
Workshop to Discuss Shoreline Master Program Update Designation
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development
PRESENTED BY:
Nicole Floyd, City Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
As part of the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) update the City is required to establish a
designation system for all properties within the shoreline environment, which includes all
properties within 200’ of the shoreline. These designations are very similar in function to the
zones established in the Zoning Code and establishes the appropriate land uses for each
specific area.
Staff has evaluated the existing SMP designations in comparison with the State requirements
and has found that most of the current designations are appropriate and do not require
modification, however there are five new designations proposed as follows:
Aquatic – All areas waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark such as tidelands.
Aquatic Conservancy – Areas waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark with
particularly sensitive or productive habitat function.
Isolated Designation – Areas where substantial barriers isolate upland areas from
influencing shorelines, such as Highway 16.
Parallel Designations – two designations are side by side in locations were roads or
other features separate upland uses from uses adjacent to the shoreline.
Recreation – Primarily applied to parks designed to facilitate public access to the
shoreline, but also applied to marinas.
Attached you will find the proposed policy direction for each different designation (Attachment I).
Attachment II)
Additionally, Staff has attached a chart ( that describes the locations, features,
and habitat function along each of the designated shoreline areas. These designations have
been reviewed by the Citizen Advisory Committee and are currently being reviewed by the
Technical Advisory Committee as well as the Department of Ecology. A PowerPoint
presentation is planned for the meeting to provide detailed explanation for these designations
and their proposed locations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission should hold a community workshop to garner public testimony,
deliberate, and provide direction to Staff regarding shoreline designations.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment I: Proposed Shoreline Designation functions
Attachment II: Shoreline Designation Chart
1
2
Attachment I
Proposed Shoreline Designation Functions
Aquatic Conservancy
This designated is for areas of marine water bodies, waterward of the Ordinary High
Water Mark whose existing natural state is relatively free of human influence, has
biological diversity, or other features particularly sensitive to human activity.
Aquatic Environment
To protect, restore, and manage the unique characteristics and resources. The Aquatic
Environment should be applied to those area waterward of the Ordinary High Water
Mark of all shorelines of the state which can include, streams and rivers, marine water
bodies, and lakes, together with their underlying lands and their water column but does
not include areas designated Aquatic Conservancy. This environment does not include
associated wetlands and other shorelands shoreward of the Ordinary High Water Mark.
Commercial
This designation is primarily for those areas which range from the high intensity
business district and small light industry to the small commercial operations located in
the various neighborhoods. The intent of this designation is to provide for water-
oriented commercial uses where feasible, and to encourage commercial development
that could enhance public access to the shoreline, either physical or visual. To provide
a setting for commercial operations that will be of economic benefit while protecting
existing ecological functions, and to restore ecological functions in areas that have been
previously degraded.
Downtown Waterfront
To encourage development of the downtown waterfront into a vital, attractive water-
oriented area that maximizes opportunities for large numbers of people to interact
passively and actively with the shoreline for leisure and enjoyment uses.
Industrial
This designation is to provide for efficient utilization of suitable shoreline areas for water
dependent commerce and industry.
Isolated
The objective of this designation is to provide appropriate regulations for areas that are
within shoreline jurisdiction but are effectively isolated from the water by intervening
elements of the built environment including railroads, roads, or intervening private
parcels.
Shoreline Master Program Update 1 - 1
Attachment I
Recreation
These areas are to provide recreational and public access opportunities as well as
maintain and restore ecological functions and preserve open space.
Residential, Multi-Family
This designation is for areas which are primarily multi-family residential or intended for
multi-family residential use. These areas are to be consistent with multi-family
neighborhood character in which they are located in terms of open space, bulk, scale,
and intensity of use as established in the Zoning Code and/or the applicable Sub-Area
Plan. In addition, provisions for appropriate public access and recreational uses are
encouraged.
Residential, Single-Family
These areas are intended for single-family residential use. They are to be consistent
with low density neighborhood character in terms of open space, bulk, scale, and
intensity of use as established in the Zoning Code. In addition, provisions for
appropriate public access and recreational uses are encouraged.
Urban Conservancy
To protect and restore ecological functions of open space, floodplain and other sensitive
lands where they exist in urban and developed settings, while allowing a variety of
compatible uses consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. These areas are identified
as having biological or physical limitations or other unique or hazardous characteristics
that are incompatible with intense development. Activities permitted in these areas are
intended to have minimal adverse impacts upon the shoreline.
Shoreline Master Program Update 1 - 2
Attachment II
ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÉ Úà ê×ÛÙÔ
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍúÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Ostrich Bay North City Limits to Urban
Parallel Designations: ~Includes Puget Sound Naval Complex,
(OstB) 1 South limit of Naval Residential
~Urban Conservancy Naval Hospital Bremerton
Hospital
waterward of Boone Rd
~Medium bank
~ Commercial
~Vegetation buffer between OHWM and
landward
Boone Rd
Ostrich Bay South limit of Urban Recreation
~Includes Puget Sound Naval Complex,
(OstB) 2 Hospital to Myers Residential
Park
Place
~Medium bank
~Vegetation along shore is partially
altered for access
Ostrich Bay Myers Place to Urban Parallel Designations:
~Medium bank
(OstB) 3 boundary of NAD Residential
~Urban Conservancy
~Vegetation buffer between OHWM and
Marine Park
waterward of S. Shore
S. Shore Drive
Rd.
~One Naval dock in reach
~ Single Family
Residential landward of
road
Ostrich Bay NAD Marine Park Urban Urban Conservancy
~ linear feet 1250
(OstB) 4 South boundary of Conservancy
~Park is generally unaltered
Puget Sound Naval
Complex to but not
including 1903
Shorewood Dr.
Ostrich Bay 1903 Shorewood Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 112 to 540 feet
(0stB) 5 Dr. to 2151 Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 0 to 50 feet
Madrona Pt Dr (Tip
of Madrona Point)
~ modifications mixed 25-65% and 76-
100%
~14 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate-extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh, kelp,
eelgrass
Page 1of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Oyster Bay 2148 Madrona Pt Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 112 to 540 feet
(OyB) 1 to 924 Lower Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 0 to 50 feet
Oyster Bay Dr
~ modifications mixed 25-65% and 76-
100%
~8 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate-extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh, kelp,
eelgrass
Oyster Bay From –but not Urban Commercial
~Commercial Lots range in depth from 15
(OyB) 2 including - 924 Commercial
to 280 feet
Lower Oyster Bay
~Building setbacks 11.5 to 40 feet
Dr to and including
4320 Kitsap Way
~ modifications 76-100%
(Flagship Inn
~2 in-water structures
Motel)
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: none
Oyster Bay 4310 Kitsap Way to Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 60 to 240 feet
(OyB) 3 and including 1705 Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 25 to 75 feet
Marine Drive
~ modifications mix of 25-65% and 76-
100%
~8 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited-moderate
~Intertidal area extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh
Oyster Bay North of 1705 Urban Parallel designation:
~Area waterward of road and water
(OyB) 4 Marine Drive (but Residential
~Urban Conservancy undeveloped – 933 linear feet
not including) to
waterward of road
~ modification 25-65%
(but not including)
Includes island
1901 Marine Drive
~no in-water structures
~Upland beyond road
~Upland vegetation extensive
Single Family
~Intertidal area extensive
Residential
~In-water vegetation: marsh
Page 2of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Oyster Bay 1901 Marine Drive Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 80 to 240 feet
(OyB) 5to 2415 S Marine Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 15 to 200 feet
Drive (Across from
Madrona Pt.)
~ modification: very limited
~1 in-water structure
~Upland vegetation limited-moderate
~Intertidal area extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh
Oyster Bay 3054 S Marine Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 60 to 360 feet
(OyB) 6Drive 3042 Marine Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 10 to 100 feet
Dr (tip of Rocky Pt.)
~ modification: mostly 76-100%, some 25-
65%, small area in northern section 1-
24%
~8 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited-moderate
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: eelgrass
Mud Bay (MB) 1 3052 Marine Drive Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 60 to 360 feet
to 1910 Marine Dr Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 33 to 233 feet
(Bottom of Mud
Bay)
~ modifications: 25-65% in northern
section, middle 1-24%, southern section
none.
~12 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation moderate
~Intertidal area extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh, kelp,
eelgrass
Mud Bay (MB) 2 4366 Kelley Dr to Semi-Rural Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 120 to 570 feet
1385 NW (KitsapResidential
~Building setbacks 50 to 185 feet
Swiftshore Ct. County)
(mouth of Mud
~ modifications: very limited
Bay)
~5 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh, kelp
Page 3of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Ostrich Bay 1385 NW Semi-Rural Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 240 to 1020
(OstB) 6Swiftshore Ct to (KitsapResidential
feet
3544 Mathews Dr County)
~Building setbacks 0 to 233 feet
NW (Tip of Rocky
Pt.)
~ modifications: mixed--mostly ~76-100%,
some areas with none
~7 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: marsh, kelp,
sargassum, eelgrass
Phinney Bay 3532 Mathews Dr Semi-Rural Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 240 to 1020
(PB) 1NW to 2710 Yacht (KitsapResidential
feet
Haven Wy County)
~Building setbacks 0 to 233 feet
~ modifications: mixed--mostly ~76-100%,
some areas with none
~8 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: marsh, kelp,
sargassum, eelgrass
Phinney Bay 2700 Yacht Haven Semi-Rural Recreation outside of
~ linear feet 1000
(PB) 2 Way(Kitsappeninsula
~Lots size 105,415 square feet,
(Bremerton Yacht County)
Club)
~Lot depth 200 feet
~Building setbacks 0 feet
~ modifications: 76-100%
~157 slips, 2 additional in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area west shore=extensive,
east shore=limited
~In-water vegetation: marsh
Page 4of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Phinney Bay 4105 NW Kennedy Semi-Rural Single Family
~Lot depth 60 to 540 feet
(BP) 3 Dr to 3680 NW (KitsapResidential
~Building setbacks 50 to 150 feet
Phinney Bay Rd County)
(Include Shaw
~ modification: 76-100%
Island)
~5 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation moderate-extensive
~Intertidal area North=extensive,
south=moderate
~In-water vegetation: marsh, eelgrass
Phinney Bay 3432 NW Phinney Semi-RuralParallel Designation:
~Area between road and water
(PB) 4 Bay Rd to NW (Kitsap
~From Road waterward undeveloped
3317 Phinney Bay County)
– Urban Conservancy
~ modification: 76-100%
Rd
~Upland - Single
~0 in-water structures
Family Residential
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: marsh, eelgrass
Phinney Bay 3304 Phinney to Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 40 to 915 feet
(PB) 5 2715 N Lafayette Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 25 to 150 feet
Ave
~ modification: west side= 76-~100%,
east side=25-65% and some lower
~6 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation moderate
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: marsh, kelp,
eelgrass
West Port 2710 N Lafayette Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 40 to 915 feet
WashingtonAve to 3200 19Residential Residential
th
~Building setbacks 25 to 150 feet
Narrows Street (Lot 5, Block
(WPWN) 1 4 Anderson Cove
~ modification: west side= 76-~100%,
1 Add)
st
east side=25-65% and some lower
~10 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation moderate
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: marsh, kelp,
eelgrass
Page 5of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
West Port 1900 Naval Ave Urban
Parallel Designation: ~ ~Port Washington Marina
WashingtonPort Washington Residential
Single Family
~ linear feet 600
Narrows Marina Urban
Residential
(WPWN) 2 Industrial
~Lots size 124,581.6 square feet,
~ Recreation for in
(Anderson
~Lot ranges in depth from 112.5 to 37.5
water marina
Cove)
feet
~Building setbacks 0 to 133 feet
~ modification: 76-100%
~About 85 slips in-water structures
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: none
West Port 1805 Thompson Urban Industrial
~ linear feet 133
WashingtonPort Washington Industrial
~Lots size 28,314 square feet,
Narrows Marina
(WPWN) 3
~Lot depth 75 feet
(Anderson
~ modification: 76-100%
Cove)
~0 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: none
West Port 1731 High Ave to Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 80 to 330 feet
WashingtonWarren Ave Bridge Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 0 to 160 feet
Narrows
(WPWN) 4
~ modification: area with none, but mostly
25-65%
~1 in-water structure (not including
Warren Ave Bridge)
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: kelp
Both sides Warren Urban Recreation
~Roto-Vista Park
Bridge Roto-Vista Residential
Park
Page 6of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
West Port Warren Ave Bridge Urban Single Family
~Number of Lots 9
Washingtonto 710 Park Dr. Residential Residential
~5.64 acres
Narrows
(WPWN) 5
~lots range in depth from 60 to 690 feet
~Building setbacks 0 to 300 feet
~ modification: 76-100%
~0 in-water structures (not including
bridge)
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: kelp
West Port Evergreen Park Urban Recreation
~Park size 13.39 acres
WashingtonConservancy
~Waterfront xx linear feet
Narrows Urban
(WPWN) 6 Industrial
~Building setbacks 33 to 367 feet
~ modification: 76-100%
~1 in-water structure
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: kelp
West Port Evergreen Park to Urban Multi-Family
~Lots range in depth from 100 to 180 feet
WashingtonMannete Bridge Commercial (upland zoning is
~Building setbacks 20 to 70 feet
Narrows Downtown Regional
WPWN) 7 Center Subarea Zoning
~ modification: 76-100%
MR-1 Multi-Family
~1 in-water structure (not including
Residential 1)
bridge)
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: kelp
West Port Both sides of Urban Recreation
WashingtonManette Bridge Commercial
Narrows
(WPWN) 8
Page 7of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
West Port Manette Bridge to Urban Downtown Multi-
~Lots range in depth from 60 to 210 feet
Washington608 Washington Commercial Family(upland zoning is
~Building setbacks 0 to 114 feet
Narrows Ave (6 Street) Downtown Regional
th
WPWN) 9 Center Subarea Zoning
~ modification: 25-65%
MR-1 Multi-Family
~0 in-water structure (not including
Residential 1)
bridge)
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: kelp
Sinclair Inlet (SI) 6 Street to Puget Downtown Downtown Waterfront
th
~Linear feet 1860
1Sound Naval Waterfront
~2 vacant lots, 0.09 total acres
Shipyard
~Lots range in depth from 70 to 206 feet
~Building setbacks 0 to 57 feet
~ modification: 25-65%
~4 in-water structures, additionally about
300 slips
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: kelp
Sinclair Inlet Puget Sound Naval Urban Industrial
~Parcel 397.47 acres
(SI2)Shipyard Industrial
~19,625 linear feet of (11,000 excluding
docks)
~ modification: 100%
~Upland vegetation none
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: none
Sinclair Inlet (SI) Puget Sound Naval Urban (Kitsap
Parallel designations: ~ linear feet 7,000 to 3015 SR 3; 11,500
3Shipyard boundary County)
to 3958 SR 16
~Waterward of Naval
to, but not including
RR and SR 3, at point ~ modification: 76-100%
3958 SR 16 West
at which RR and SR 3
~0 in-water structures
diverge, follows SR 3 –
~Upland vegetation (upland side)
~Urban Conservancy
moderate
Upland of SR 3 –
~Intertidal area limited most of the reach
Excluded
~In-water vegetation: none identified
Page 8of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Sinclair Inlet (SI) 3958 SR 16 West Urban (Kitsap
Parallel designations: ~ length 1,300 feet
4to 3650 SR 16 SW County)
~Waterward of Building ~Number of commercial lots – 6
setback– Urban
~Commercial lot acres – 13.23
Conservancy,
~Lots range in depth from 35 to 300 feet
~Commercial -
Landward of Building
~Building setbacks 30 to 314 feet
Setback
~ modification: 76-100%
~0 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh
Sinclair Inlet (SI) 3050 SR 16 SW Urban (Kitsap Sinclair Inlet Wildlife
~ length 800 feet
4County) Area
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh
Sinclair Inlet (SI) 2800 SR 16 SW Urban Parallel designations:
~Former landfill
5Elandan GardensConservancy
~Waterward of Building
~ length – 250
setback– Urban
~Parcel size – 1.53 acres
Conservancy,
~Recreational -
~Building setback 588 feet
Landward of Building
~ modification: 76-100%
Setback
~0 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh
Sinclair Inlet (SI) 2800 SR 16 SW Urban Urban Conservancy,
~Ease of former landfill
6east of Elandan Conservancy
~ length – 500’
Gardens
~ modification: 0%
~0 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation narrow adjacent to
road
~Intertidal area extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh
Page 9of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
East Port Riddell Road to Rural (Kitsap Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 180 to 615 feet
Washington3845 Tracy Beach County) Residential
~Building setbacks 30 to 486 feet
Narrows Rd
(EPWN) 1
~ modification: 76-100%
~1 in-water structure
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: marsh
East Port 3765 Tracy Beach Conservancy Parallel designation:
~ length 4,900
WashingtonRd Sheridan Road (Kitsap
~Urban Conservancy -
~Average road setback from OHWM 30
Narrows County)
Waterward of Road
feet
(EPWN) 2
~ Single Family
~ modification: 76-100%
Residential-
~1 in-water structure
Upland of Road
~Upland vegetation moderate
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: kelp
East Sheridan Road to Urban Recreation or Urban
~Park size 19.11 acres
2475 Stephenson Conservancy Conservancy
~Waterfront 2,000 linear feet
Ave
Lions Field
~Building setbacks 10 to 570 feet
~ modification: limited
~2 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
`Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: kelp
East Port 2506 Stephenson Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 171 to 371 feet
WashingtonAve to Sheridan Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 71 to 257 feet
Narrows Park
(EPWN) 4
~ modification: 25-65%
~0 in-water structure (not including
bridge)
~Upland vegetation moderate-extensive
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: kelp
Page 10of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Sheridan Park Urban
Parallel Designation: ~Park size 5.6 acres
Warren Bridge Conservancy
~ Upland Commercial ~Waterfront 790 linear feet
Theater
~Below top of slope is ~Building setback 228 feet
Urban Conservancy
~ modification: 1-25%
~0 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: kelp
Port1107 Campbell Wy Urban
Parallel Designation: ~ length 1,800 feet
Washingtonto 1921 Wheaton Commercial
~ Commercial for ~Misc. services lots 4; 1.52 acres
Narrows Way
upland
(EPWN) 5
~Sheds and garages lots: 1; 1.39 acres
~Conservancy for below
~Number of residential lots 10
top of slope.
~Undeveloped lots: 5
~Recreational lots: 1
~Lots range in depth from 34 to 172 feet
~Building setbacks 57 to 187 feet
~ modification: 1-25%
~`0 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: kelp
East Port East of 1921 Urban Multi-Family
~Lots range in depth from 70 to 640 feet
WashingtonWheaton to Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 0 to 486 feet
Narrows Manette Bridge
(EPWN) 6 (includes CCR –
~ modification: mostly 76-100%
City Core
~0 in-water structure
Residential and
Manette Subarea
~Upland vegetation limited
R-10 zoning)
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: kelp, sargassum
East Port Manette Bridge Urban Recreation
Washingtonboth sides Conservancy
Narrows
(EPWN) 7
Page 11of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
East Port Manette Bridge to Urban Urban Commercial
~ length 466 feet
Washington201 Shore Dr Commercial
~Number of commercial lots – 3
Narrows (Mantette Subarea
(EPWN) 8 NCC-Neighborhood
~Commercial lot acres – 0.41
Center Core)
~Number of residential lots- 1
~Zoned Communications: 1 lot, 0.09
acres
~Zoned 370-50+ units: 1 lot, 0.87 acres
~Lots about 100 feet deep
~Building setbacks about 0 feet
~ modification: 76-100%
~2 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area limited
~In-water vegetation: sargassum
Port Orchard 211 Shore Drive to Urban Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 77 to 120 feet
Bay (POB) 1 711 Shore Drive Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 0 to 60 feet
With Shore Drive
Overlay
~ modification: 76-100%
~1 in-water structure
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: sargassum
Port Orchard 805 Shore Drive to Urban Single Family
~Average lot depth about 120 feet
Bay (POB) 2 1151 Shore Drive Residential Residential
~Building setbacks 0 to 30 feet
With Shore Drive
Overlay
~ modification: 76-100%
~1 in-water structure
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: sargassum
Page 12of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Port Orchard 1334 Jacobsen Semi-Rural Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 195 to 345 feet
Bay (POB) 3 Blvd to 1926 (KitsapResidential
~Building setbacks 0 to 215 feet
Jacobsen Ln County)
~ modification: 25-65%
~1 in-water structure
~Upland vegetation limited
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: sargassum
Port Orchard 1938 Jacobsen Semi-Rural Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 300 to 1020
Bay (POB) 4 Blvd to 2504 NE (KitsapResidential
feet
Enetai Beach Rd County)
~Building setbacks 5 to 86 feet
~ modification: 1-24%
~3 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation extensive, but not
directly adjacent to shore
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: kelp, sargassum
Port Orchard 2700 NE Enatai Conservancy Urban Conservancy
~Lots range in depth from 120 to 960 feet
Bay (POB) 5 Beach Rd to (but (Kitsap
~Building setbacks 130 to 428 feet
not including County)
3735) Bahia Vista
~ modification: 76-100%, with section of
Drive
none
~1 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: kelp, sargassum
Port Orchard 3735 Bahia Vista Rural (Kitsap Single Family
~Lots range in depth from 342 to 457 feet
Bay (POB) 6 Drive to Illahee County) Residential
~Building setbacks 5 to 143 feet
State Park
~ modification: 76-100%
~1 in-water structure
~Upland vegetation limited directly upland
from shore, extensive upland from houses
~Intertidal area moderate
~In-water vegetation: kelp, sargassum
Page 13of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Gorst Creek Sinclair Inlet to SR No designation Parallel Designation:
~ length 233 feet
(GC) 1 3~Conservancy on left
~Number of commercial lots – 2
Bank (north)
~Commercial on right
~Commercial lot acres – 1.84
Bank (south)
~Number of residential lots- 0
(Note – designated
Freeway Corridor l in
~Undeveloped lots- 1 (0.14 acres)
Bremerton UGA zoning
~Lots range in depth from 93 to 133 feet
map)
~Building setbacks 15 to 25 feet
~ modification: north bank: limited, south
bank: 76-100%
no in-water structure
~Upland vegetation extensive
~Intertidal area extensive
~In-water vegetation: marsh
Gorst Creek SR 3 to Sam No designation Commercial
~ length 1,666 feet
(GC) 2 Christopherson (Note – designated
~Number of commercial lots – 9
Avenue Freeway Corridor l in
Bremerton UGA zoning
~Commercial lot acres – 6.98
map)
~Number of residential lots—11
~Residential lot acres—8.72
~Lots range in depth from 130 to 400 feet
~Building setbacks unknown
~ armoring unknown
~Upland vegetation extensive
~In-water vegetation: unknown
Gorst Creek SamNo designation Single Family
length 1,000 feet
(GC) 3 Christopherson Residential
Number of residential lots 5
Avenue to W (Note – designated
Belfair Valley Rd Residential in
MH-real property lots 1
Bremerton UGA zoning
Lots range in depth from 100 to 550 feet
map)
Building setbacks unknown
armoring unknown
Upland vegetation extensive
In-water vegetation: unknown
Page 14of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Gorst Creek W Belfair Valley Rd No designation Recreation
~City park and fish hatchery
(GC) 4 to power line
easement
(hatchery in Otto
Jarstad Park)
Gorst Creek Power line No designation Urban Conservancy
~City owned Watershed
(GC) 5 easement
in Otto Jarstad
Park to end of
jurisdiction
Lake Kitsap South side of lake Urban Recreation Developed
~Park size 30.76 acres
(LK) 1 to 1976 Price Rd Conservancy portion of park
~Waterfront 1,935 linear feet
Lake Kitsap Park
~Building setback 43 feet
~ modification: 1-25%
~3 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation extensive
~In-water vegetation: unknown
Lake Kitsap Easterly portion of Urban Urban Conservancy
~Wetland area
(LK) 2 Lake Kitsap Park Conservancy
Lake Kitsap Platted Lake Kitsap Urban Single Family
~Number of residential lots 111
(LK) 3 Residential Residential
~Lots range in depth from 143 to 706 feet
~Building setback 15 to 343 feet
~ modification: 25-65%
~92 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
~In-water vegetation: unknown
Lake Kitsap 1012 Kitsap Lake Urban Recreation
~Park size 18.52 acres
(LK) 4RdConservancy
~Waterfront 465 linear feet
Navy – Camp
McKean
~Building setback 57 feet
~ modification: 1-25%
~1 in-water structures
~Upland vegetation limited
~In-water vegetation: unknown
Union River and AllUrban Urban Conservancy
~City owned Watershed
ReservoirConservancy
Page 15of 16
Attachment II
åÛÈ×Ê úÍØà ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ
ÛÎØ ê×ÛÙÔ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø
îÍ úÍÇÎØÛÊÓ×É ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÷ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ìÊ×É×ÎÈ
Twin Lakes AllUrbanUrban Conservancy
~City Owned Watershed
Conservancy
Page 16of 16