HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/07/2011 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 ❑ Phone (360) 473 -5280
DECEMBER 7, 2011
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
1 BRIEFING 5 00 — 5 30 P M in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603
A General Council Business
2 CALL TO ORDER 5 30 P M in FIRST FLOOR CHAMBERS
A Pledge of Allegiance
B Invocation
3 MAYOR'S REPORT
4 PUBLIC RECOGNITION
5 CONSENT AGENDA
A Claims & Check Register
B Minutes of Budget Workshop — November 1, 2011
C Minutes of Meeting — November 2, 2011
D Minutes of Budget Workshop — November 7, 2011
E Minutes of Budget Workshop — November 9, 2011
F Minutes of Meeting — November 16, 2011
G Minutes of Budget Workshop — November 21, 2011
H Minutes of Study Session — November 30, 2011
1 Appointment of Will Maupin to the Bremerton Housing Authority Board of Commissioners
J Reappointment of Kelli Lambert to the Planning Commission
K Interlocal Agreement KC 450 -11 with Kitsap County for Mutual Aid in Processing of Bio-
solids from their respective Wastewater Treatment Plants
L Award Public Works Construction Contract to INSTITLIFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC for 4 Street
Sewer Lining for the Park Avenue Plaza Project Phase II
M Mutual Aid Agreement between the City of Bremerton and participating Kitsap County Law
Enforcement Agencies
N Resolution No 3157 establishing January 18, 2012 as a Hearing Date to vacate Broadway
Avenue from 13 to 16 Streets
O Interlocal Agreement with King County for Regional Aerial Mapping
6 GENERAL BUSINESS
A Ordinance No 5171 creating Chapter 11 18 of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC)
entitled "Addressing"
B Renewal of Annual Admiral Theatre Commitment to the Admiral Theatre Foundation
Continued on back...
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request Those requiring special accommodations
should contact the City Clerk's Office at (360) 473 -5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Council meeting /'
C Resolution No 3158 ratifying Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies with 2011 amendments
as revised and adopted by the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners on November 14,
2011
D Approval of a $25,000 grant -match to be used to fund a Project Manager for the
development, planning, and coordination of the Youth Wellness Campus
7 PUBLIC HEARINGS
A Ordinance No 5169 amending Section 3 82 020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC)
relating to the Commercial Parking Tax (A Public Heanng was held November 16, 2011)
B Ordinance No 5170 amending Chapter 3 50 of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC)
relating to Utility Taxes for Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Utilities (A Public Hearing
was held November 16, 2011)
C Ordinance No 5172 amending Rates and Fees established by Ordinance No 5132 (Water
Rate increase)
D Ordinance No 5173 approving and adopting the 2012 Fiscal Year Budget for the City of
Bremerton
8 COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
9 ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
The Bremerton Transportation Benefit District Board will meet in the Chambers immediately
following the adjournment of the City Council Business Meeting...
® Amencans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request Those requ►nng special accommodations
1 should contact the City Clerk's Office at (360) 473 -5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Council meeting
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
MEETING SPEAKERS LIST
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME BELOW
IF YOU WISH YOUR COMMENTS TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE RECORD
Z
�j
L:�tl Z A v c S
J 6 #/V/ 4;� " L� 1 >
�C) yea
R ob,,+ A 5,5 B cA1 r1 'Q
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CLERK
THANK YOU
BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL
MEETING SPEAKERS LIST
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME BELOW
IF YOU WISH YOUR COMMENTS TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE RECORD
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CLERK
THANK YOU
AGENDA BILL 644
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
•• rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrsrrr�
SUBJECT: Claims & Check Register Study Session Date
COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
Department Financial Services
Presenter Cathy Johnson
Phone 473 -5296
SUMMARY: Consent Agenda item Approval of checks and electronic fund transfers
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount)
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
1) Check #s 345956 through 346249 and EFTs 11397 through 11460 in the amount of
$4,587,49318
2) Regular Payroll for the pay period ending 11/15/2011 in the amount of $734,053 31
3) Regular Payroll for the pay period ending 11/30/2011 in the amount of $742,139 58
4) Retiree Payroll for the pay period ending 11/30/2011 in the amount of $73,758 08
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ Con ent A en ❑ General Business E] Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT -
��Ea
COUNCIL ACTION: [Approve ❑ Deny Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 5
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
For meeting of COUNCIL MEETING Date U2.C�YYI�,pf 7� a o
W 'a WorK Sbo Department City Council
Presenter _ Maupm, President
00Vrb� 1 1 ° Phone (360) 473 -5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A
APPROVALS: N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented
STUDY SESSION ACTION: x Consent A ends ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP MINUTES
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
The Budget Workshop of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the
Council Conference Room, Room 603 of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER located at 345
6 th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Tuesday, November 1, 2011, at 4 00 PM, with Council
President WIII Maupin presiding Council members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends,
Dianne Robinson, Greg Wheeler, Roy Runyon, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Jim
McDonald Legislative Assistant Lori Smith was present to provide staff support to the Council
President Maupin announced that the 2012 Budget Workshop was for the Council to hear
presentations and ask questions on the proposed budget It was further announced that this
Budget Workshop was open to the public, but there would be no opportunities for input or
participation, that no action will be taken, and the content of these items is subject to change
Becky Hasart Financial Services Director, discussed the Budget Process, and presented an
overview of City -Wide Revenue & Expenditures and General Fund Revenue & Expenditures
With no further business, President Maupin adjourned the Budget Workshop at approximately
625 PM
Pre ared and Submit ed by
LORI SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest
SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WMSCIscg
i (
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 5C
■■ eseeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeseeeseeeeeeeeeeeee
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
For meeting of COUNCIL MEETING Date Decemn , � 7 � p
�OVeb� a I ( Department City Council
Presenter Will Maupm, President
Phone (360) 473 -5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A
APPROVALS: N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented
STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent A ends El General Business
❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny Table ❑ Continue
❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
i
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 2, 2011
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Conference Room 603, of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER, 345 6 th Street, Bremerton,
Washington, Wednesday, November 2, 2011, at 5 00 PM, with Council President Will Maupin
presiding Council Members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Greg
Wheeler, Roy Runyon, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Jim McDonald City Attorney Roger
Lubovich, Interim City Clerk Shannon Conn, and Legislative Assistant Lori Smith were present to
provide staff support
A COUNCIL BRIEFING was then held to discuss General Council Business at 5 00 PM in the Council
Conference Room At 5 30 PM the meeting moved to the Meeting Chambers
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Jim McDonald followed by the invocation
provided by Pastor Ron Anderson of Manette Community Church
MAYOR'S REPORT — Mayor Patty Lent
• Received a $25,000 check donated by the Bremerton Rotary,
• Proclaimed Friday, November 11, 2011 as Veteran's Day, and Judy Megan of the Bremerton
Elks Lodge accepted the proclamation and invited the community to attend the open Lodge
meeting on Thursday, November 10 at 7 30 PM with Capt Jerry Coffee as the guest speaker,
• Proclaimed the Month of November as Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month ",
• Announced the "Send Hunger Packing" Community Food Drive for the month of November,
• Noted local Pepsi delivery trucks had signs to announce that the new Bremerton Boys & Girls
Club is coming soon,
• Congratulated Dr Scott Lindquist of the Kitsap Health District for receiving the Annual Public
Health Leader Award, and Yolanda Fong for receiving the Emerging Health Leader Award, and
• Invited the Council and the Community to the Annual Veteran's Day Program to be held on
Friday, November 11, 2011 at the Kitsap Pavilion
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Don Larson invited the community to attend the Public Meeting on the Sinclair Inlet Shoreline
Development Concept Plan in the Meeting Chambers on Thursday, November 3, 2011
Mike Walton Marketing Director at the Kitsap Family YMCA, announced upcoming events
Joyce Morton encouraged attendance at the "SurvIve & Thnve" Financial Class that would be held
on Saturday, November 5 at the Kitsap Community Resources (KCR) Offices
Carl Gliver owner of Great American Furniture, addressed the City's Budget crisis, and was
particularly concerned to read that over 25 City employees would be laid off because it will mean
reduced services that taxpayers already pay for
Todd Best was also bothered that the City was losing employees, especially when higher
management was paid so high, which also is the reason he believed that all City employees should
be residents of the City
Raven Rayne announced that the next "Cause for Hope" Celebration will be held on Tuesday,
November 8 at 6 00 PM in her office, and will be circulating a petition in support of Initiative 502 to
legalize marihuana
President Maupin welcomed new Interim City Clerk Shannon Corin
CONSENT AGENDA
A Correction to Check Numbers 345323 through 345535, and EFT -11277 through EFT -11321 that
were approved on October 19, 2011, Check Numbers 345536 through 345732, and EFT -11322
City Council Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Page 2 of 5
through EFT -11361 in the amount of $1,029,571 13, Regular Payroll for the pay period ending
October 15, 2011 in the amount of $6,108 00, and Retiree Payroll for the pay period ending
October 31, 2011 in the amount of $76,260 89
B Minutes of Meeting — October 19, 2011
C Minutes of Study Session — October 26, 2011
D Appointment of Gunnar Fridnksson to the position of Managing Engineer
E Renewal of Professional Services Agreement between the City of Bremerton and Kitsap
Community Resources for Bremerton Community Service Work Program
F Award Contract to HOKKAIDO DRILLING, INC for Well 13 & Well 14 Rehabilitation- Replacement
Project
G Construction Contract to COULTAS GENERAL CONTRACTING for Brick Veneer Installation for the
Park Avenue Plaza Project Phase II
There were no comments from the public
05:59.44 M /S /C /U (Arends /Runyon) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented
PUBLIC HEARING
6A — RESOLUTION NO. 3155 APPROVING FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INCLUSION IN
THE 2012 CDBG /HOME ACTION PLAN Marie Vila Community Development Block Grant
Administrator, summarized that on May 18, 2011, City Council approved the 2012 CDBG /HOME
Policy Plan outlining the CDBG and HOME funding allocation process Based on that policy, the
program's Grant Recommendation Committees have developed funding recommendations for
Council consideration and approval If approved, these submissions will be sent to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in the 2012 Annual Action Plan
President Maua►n opened the Public Hearing for comments
Comments received in favor of Resolution No 3155 were received by the following
April Mills Roxanne Bryson Holly Ridge Center Executive Director, and Joe Rosack Director of
Kitsap Mental Health Services
06.16.35 Motion to pass the resolution was made by Wheeler, and seconded by Robinson
Full disclosure was provided by Roy Runyon due to his wife serving as the Executive Director of
Bremerton Foodline, and he would voluntarily abstain from the vote, and Greg Wheeler due to being
on the Kitsap Community Resources Board of Directors, however City Attorney Roger Lubovich said
it was not necessary for him to abstain from the vote
Discussion was then opened to the Council for their questions and comments, which were received
by Brockus and Robinson
06 M /S /C (Wheeler /Robinson) Move to pass Resolution No 3155 approving the 2012 funding
recommendations to be included in the 2012 Action Plan to HUD, and authorize the Mayor to finalize
and execute the contracts with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented once all
funding has been secured and HUD has approved the Annual Action Plan
Voted in favor of Motion McConnell, Brockus, Wheeler, Robinson, Arends, Wofford, McDonald,
Maupin
Abstained Runyon
Motion carried, 8 -Yes, 1- Abstention
City Council Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Page 3 of 5
GENERAL BUSINESS
7A — PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT WITH WESTMARK CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR THE
BIOSOLIDS STORAGE RELOCATION /ROOF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT: Bill McKinney
Forestry Manager, pointed out that the proposed contract is for construction of two pole -type roofs on
two identical existing facilities at Biosolids Application Site 1 west of Gold Mountain Golf Course The
site has been permitted for biosolids application since 1989 through the Kitsap County Health District
and the State Department of Ecology The existing concrete structures were originally built and used
for storage of liquid biosolids With the construction of roofs, the facilities will be able to be used to
store dewatered biosolids This project will replace the existing dewatered storage facility adjacent to
the Gold Mountain Golf Course Maintenance Facility and move biosolids storage operations further
from the golf course The contractor named below (Westmark Construction, Inc ) submitted the
lowest qualified bid for construction of the two roof structures
There were no comments from the public
06:25:48 Motion to approve agreement was made by Runyon, and seconded by Brockus
Discussion was then opened to the Council for their questions and comments, which were received
by Runyon, Wheeler, Robinson, and Arends
06:29.35 M /S /C /U (Runyon / Brockus) Move to award the Public Works Agreement with Westmark
Construction, Inc of Tacoma, WA for $80,178 29 including Washington State Sales Tax (WSST) for
construction of two wood pole roofs to be installed at the Biosolids Application Site 1, and authorize
the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as
presented
7B — ORDINANCE NO. 5167 AMENDING BREMERTON MUNICIPAL CODE (BMCI CHAPTER 3.12
ENTITLED "ONE PERCENT FOR THE ARTS FUND" TO SUSPEND EXPENDITURES FOR NEW
ART UNTIL JANUARY 1. 2014 Andrea Spencer Community Development Director, explained that
on October 11, 2011, the City Council's Planning Committee met and discussed potential
modifications to the City's One Percent for the Arts Program It was felt that it would be in the best
interest to suspend expenditures from the One Percent for the Arts Program for the selection,
development, and placement of art to a later date due to the City's current budget constraints Ms.
Spence also explained that Section 1 of the ordinance was amended to reflect that the Planning
Committee along with the Director of Community Development would now authorize expenditures
The committee discussed two options to suspend the program
1) Suspension of only expenditures for new art and applicable capital projects would still
contribute money to the program (at this time there are no projects that are scheduled for
contribution), or
2) Suspension of both expenditures for new art and applicable capital projects would also not be
required to contribute to the program
After much discussion, a majority of the Planning Committee (but not unanimously) voted to forward
to the Council an ordinance that reflects Option 1 above Other highlights of the proposed ordinance
include
a) Funds from the One Percent for the Arts Program can still be expended for the repair,
maintenance, and installation of our current One Percent for the Arts collection,
b) The terms of our current Arts Commissioners will be extended for two additional years
to cover the period of suspension, and
c) The period of suspension can be shortened or lengthened by the City Council
City Council Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Page 4 of 5
Jim Anderson expressed his opinion about why he believed it was wrong to suspend any aspect of
the 1 % for the Arts Program because it keeps the City moving forward
Colleen Smidt believed that the City was correct in suspending the 1 % for the Arts Program due to
the current economic conditions
06:47 45 Motion to adopt ordinance was made by Wofford, and seconded by Robinson
06:49.15 Move to amend the Main Motion to include a restriction under Section C was made by
Runyon, and seconded by Wheeler
City Attorney Roger Lubovich was favorable to local preference but expressed caution about
restrictions Andrea Spencer clarified that local preference has already been addressed in the Arts
Commission Master Plan
Comments on the amendment were received by Wofford, Arends, Runyon, Brockus, Maupin, and
Wheeler
07:05:00 A -M /S /F (Runyon/Wheeler) Move to amend Ordinance No 5167 by adding Section C to
BMC Chapter 3 12 — "Purchases of art shall be restricted to works produced by artists based in
Washington State, Oregon, and Idaho "
Voted in favor of Amendment Runyon, Robinson
Voted against Amendment Wheeler, Arends, Wofford, McDonald, McConnell, Brockus, Maupin
Amended Motion failed, 2 -Yes, 7 -No
07 Move to amend the Main Motion to include language "contribution to and" was made by
Wheeler, and seconded by Runyon
Comments on the amendment were received by Wheeler, Brockus, McConnell, Runyon, Wofford,
Robinson, and Maupin
07:21.30 A -M /S /F (Wheeler /Runyon) Move to amend the ordinance by adding "contributions from
Capital Improvement Projects to and" before the word "expenditures" in the second whereas and in
the first line of Section 1
Voted in favor of Amendment Wheeler, McConnell, Runyon
Voted against Amendment Robinson, Arends, Wofford, McDonald, Brockus, Maupin
Amended Motion failed, 3 -Yes, 6 -No
Discussion was then opened to the Council for their questions and comments on the MAIN MOTION
which were received by McDonald, Brockus, Maupin, Wheeler, and Runyon
Andrea Spencer clarified that there are no planned art installations at this time so this is a good
stopping point in the program
07 M /S /C (Wofford /Robinson) Move to adopt Ordinance No 5167 as amended (to include the
Planning Committee in Section 1), suspending the One Percent for the Arts Program until January 1,
2014
Voted in favor of Main Motion Robinson, Wofford, McConnell, Runyon, Maupin
Voted against the Main Motion Arends, McDonald, Brockus, Wheeler
Motion carried, 5 -Yes, 4 -No
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Adam Brockus announced that there will be a raffle on Friday, November 4 at 7 00 PM at Kate's
Jersey Subs with the winner to be one of the first drivers across the new Manette Bridge with
City Council Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Page 5 of 5
proceeds of the raffle to go towards a new Christmas Tree at the end of 11 Street, announced the
bridge would be closing tomorrow, and looked forward to the new Manette Bridge Grand Opening and
Ribbon Cutting Ceremony on Thursday, November 10 at Noon Mr. Anderson suggested the tickets
be available in other areas of the City
Roy Runyon reminded everyone the First Friday Art Walk would be this week
Greg Wheeler encouraged attendance at a free "Survive & Thrive" Financial Class sponsored by
Kitsap Community Resources on November 5 from 10 00 AM to 2 00 PM, announced the Union Hill
Neighborhood Block Watch Meeting on November 7 at the Community of Christ at Memorial Lutheran
Church located at the corner of 10` Street and Veneta Avenue, also announced the Veteran's Day
Program starting at 10 30 AM at the Kitsap County Pavilion, and had fun at the City Halloween Party
Dianne Robinson encouraged people to donate hats, gloves, mittens, scarves or coats for the
homeless and low- income by November 10, Mondays through Thursdays, 9 00 AM to 1 00 PM, at the
Bremerton United Methodist Church, and announced that there will be a 5 -hour "First Time Home
Buyers Class" on Saturday, November 5 at the Reid Real Estate Office located in Silverdale
Carol Arends reported the first Safe Trick -or -Treat night in the Charleston Historic District was a
success, and as a member of the Audit Committee, a report would be issued tomorrow for unpaid
traffic infractions
Nick Wofford reminded citizens there was only one week left to vote, encouraged attendance at the
Public Meeting on the Sinclair Inlet Shoreline Development Concept Plan in the Meeting Chambers
on Thursday, November 3, 2011, and thanked all of the citizens who participate in running local
government
Will Maupin attended the "Fiddler on the Roof' production at the Bremerton Community Theater and
said it was probably the best he has ever seen, and reported on his ride on the passenger only ferry
President Maupin adjourned the Council Meeting at 7 50 PM
Prepared and Submitted by
LORI WITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest
SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WMSCIscg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL v5D
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
For meeting of COUNCIL MEETING Date 'Dee � 7 J
Department City Council
13 UA' Presenter Will Maupm, President
A0V gW 6 e, ' - 7 i a-o Phone (360) 473 -5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A
APPROVALS: N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented
STUDY SESSION ACTION: X Consent A enda El General Business El Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT .
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
November 7, 2011
The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the Council
Conference Room, Room 603 of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER located at 345 6th
Washington, Monday, November 7, 2011, at 4 00 PM, with Council President Will Maupin
presiding Council Members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Greg
Wheeler, Roy Runyon, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Jim McDonald City Attorney Roger
Lubovich and Legislative Assistant Lori Smith were present to provide staff support
President Maupin announced that the Special meeting was open to the public, and there would
be an opportunity for input, and that action was anticipated on the General Business item
GENERAL BUSINESS
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH PSE FOR SCHEDULE 74 CONVERSION (OVERHEAD TO
UNDERGROUND) FOR 4 T11 STREET ALLEY AS PART OF THE PARK AVENUE PLAZA PHASE
II PROJECT Gary Sexton Redevelopment Projects Administrator, explained that this contract is
for labor and materials provided by Puget Sound Energy (PSE) in order to perform the overhead
conversion work for the 4 Street alley conversion This work will convert the existing overhead
electrical distribution system to underground facilities in the alley between Burwell & 4 from Park
to Pacific, as part of the Park Avenue Plaza Phase II Project The cost of this electrical conversion
project will be shared with PSE The amount to be contracted (City's portion) is $156,218 00
Joe Hudson Evergreen Trophy, expressed concern that business owners are asked to pay to
improve the alley when only the City will benefit therefore he believes the City should pay the
entire cost
Jerry Soriano agreed with Mr Hudson's comments, and believed that the project will affect him
even more since how owns a business on each side of the alley He is upset that PSE offered
three options and the City chose the highest (Option C)
Motion to approve the contract was made by Brockus, and seconded by Wofford
Discussion was then opened to the Council for their questions and comments which were received
by Runyon, McConnell, Wofford, Wheeler, and Maupin
04 45 00 M /S /C (Brockus/Wofford) Move to approve the PSE Schedule 74 Conversion Contract
with Puget Sound Energy, and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with
substantially the same terms and conditions as presented
Voted in favor of Motion McDonald, McConnell, Brockus, Arends, Wofford, Maupin
Voted against Motion Runyon, Wheeler, Robinson
Motion carried 6 -Yes, 3 -No
President Maupin then opened the 2012 Budget Workshop for the Council to hear presentations
and ask questions on the proposed budget It was further announced that this Budget Workshop
was open to the public, but there would be no opportunities for input or participation, that no action
will be taken, and the content of these items is subject to change
Becky Hasart Financial Services Director, presented an overview on "General Fund" revenues
and expenditures Department Directors and Managers provided presentations on individual
Departments as follows
1) Mayor /Executive
2) City Council
City Council Special Meeting Minutes
Monday, November 7, 2011
Page 2of2
3) Financial Services, City Clerk, including Police & Fire Pension, and Human Resources
4) City Attorney's Office and Risk Management
5) Municipal Court, including Trial Improvement
6) Department of Community Development, including Abatements, CDBG, and 1 % for Arts
7) City Auditor
8) Law Enforcement, including Police Special Projects Fund
9) Fire and EMS
10) Parks & Recreation
Becky Hasart then provided a brief overview of "Special Revenue Funds ", "Debt Service Funds ",
"Capital Improvement Funds ", "Capital Improvement Program ", and "Internal Service Funds"
With no further business, President Maupin adjourned the Special Meeting at approximately 7 55
PM
Prepared and Submitted by
LO I SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest
SHANNON CORK Interim City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WMSCIscg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 56
■■ � aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa � a �
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
For meeting of COUNCIL MEETING Date - DiecC ' " e 7, D
t3�
M (,OO ho P Department City Council
Presenter Will Maupm, President
" a , ao ( ( Phone (360) 473 -5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A
APPROVALS: N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented
STUDY SESSION ACTION: X Consent A enda ❑ General Business El Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT '
COUNCIL ACTION: El Approve ❑ Deny Table Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP MINUTES
Tuesday, November 9, 2011
The Budget Workshop of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the
Council Conference Room, Room 603 of the N ORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER located at 345 6`
Street, Bremerton, Washington, Tuesday, November 9, 2011, at 4 00 PM, with Council Vice -
President Adam Brockus presiding Council members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends,
Dianne Robinson, Greg Wheeler, Roy Runyon, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Jim
McDonald Council Member Will Maupin was absent Legislative Assistant Lori Smith was present
to provide staff support to the Council
Finance Committee Chair Nick Wofford convened the meeting on behalf of Vice - President
Brockus, emphasizing that the Budget Workshop was open to the public, however there would be
no opportunities for input or participation, and that no action will be taken
Vice - President Brockus arnved at approx 4 15 PM, and chaired the remainder of the meeting
Discussion continued regarding the City of Bremerton 2012 Proposed Budget Alan Lobdell
Interim Director for the Public Works & Utilities Department provided an overview of the
Department, followed by staff presentations from each Public Works division
With no further business, Vice - President Brockus adjourned the Budget Workshop at
approximately 7 18 PM
Prepared and Submitted by
/* �/4 P� & ) -
LORI SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest
SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk
ADAM BROCKUS, City Council Vice - President
AB SC Is cg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
■■ aaaaaaaaaaaamaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaasaaaa aaaaaaaaoaa naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaI
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
For meeting of COUNCIL MEETING Date 'De--,e � - 7. J-0
Nove h'�ber , � Department _City Council
Presenter Will Maupin, President
Phone X360) 473 -5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A
APPROVALS: N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented
STUDY SESSION ACTION: XConsent A ends
❑General Business ❑Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT '
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny Table
❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
November 16, 2011
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Conference Room 603, of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER, 345 6 1h Street, Bremerton,
Washington, Wednesday, November 16, 2011, at 5 00 PM, with Council Vice - President Adam
Brockus presiding Council Members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson,
Greg Wheeler, Roy Runyon, Cecil McConnell, and Jim McDonald Council President Will Maupin
was absent City Attorney Roger Lubovich, Interim City Clerk Shannon Conn, and Legislative
Assistant Lori Smith were present to provide staff support
A COUNCIL BRIEFING was then held to discuss General Council Business at 5 00 PM in the Council
Conference Room At 5 30 PM the meeting moved to the Meeting Chambers
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Jim McDonald followed by the invocation
provided by Pastor Eric Roberts of New Life Assembly
MAYOR'S REPORT — In the absence of Mayor Lent, Mayor Pro Tempore Brockus
• Presented a PowerPoint@ of the highlights on the Manette Bridge Opening Ceremony,
• Proclaimed November 16, 2011 as "Chronic Pulmonary Disease Awareness Day ", and
• Proclaimed November 16, 2011 as " Manette Local Business Day"
PUBLIC RECOGNITION — There were no comments tonight
CONSENT AGENDA
A Check Numbers 345733 through 345955, and EFT -11362 through EFT -11396 in the amount of
$1,620,121 83, Regular Payroll for the pay period ending October 31, 2011 in the amount of
$752,319 08, and Regular Payroll for the pay period ending October 31, 2011 In the amount of
$13,39303
P#aase -I4 Item postponed until December 7
There were no comments from the public
05:41.22 M /S /C /U (Runyon / Arends) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented
PUBLIC HEARINGS
6A — PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENT ON REVENUE SOURCES FOR THE 2012
PROPOSED BUDGET (NO ACTION): AND APPROVING ORDINANCE NO 5' LEVYING
PROPERTY TAXES FOR COLLECTION IN 2012 (WITH ACTIOM Beckv Hasart Financial
Services Director, explained that the City's property taxes are levied on an annual basis through
passage of an ordinance The proposed ordinance will implement a general property tax levy and a
voted EMS levy at a statutory rate limit as well as a bond redemption levy at a rate adequate to
provide funds necessary to meet debt service obligations
Vice - President Brockus opened the Public Hearing for comment on the proposed 2012 Budget,
including revenue sources, and the ordinance to levy property taxes
Karen Rogers Stacy Dore Carolyn Lindquist Kristina Kruzan Max Simons and Ariana Wells
spoke of the benefits of the Youth Wellness Campus to local youth and therefore urged approval of
the Mayor's budget that includes $25,000 for the project (that will net $19- million in funds)
Todd Best believes there is still "fat" that can be trimmed from the budget rather than to lay off the
proposed 25 City employees
City Council Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Page 2 of 4
Jim Adrian expressed his support for a 1 % raise in property taxes, the $25,000 line item in the
Mayor's Budget for the Youth Wellness Campus, and an increase in car tabs to generate funds for
street repair, but does not support eliminating 2 of 4 Customer Service staff from Water Resources
DoStay ff spoke against the proposal to eliminate 25 City positions
Vice - President Brockus closed the Public Hearing to further comment from the public on the
proposed 2012 Budget, including revenue sources, and the ordinance to levy property taxes, and
opened discussion to the Council on the ordinance to levy property taxes
06:19.45 Motion to approve the ordinance was made by Runyon, and seconded by Wheeler,
Questions and comments were received by McConnell, Runyon, Arends, Wofford, McDonald, and
Wheeler
06:28.05 M /S /C /U (Runyon/Wheeler) Move to approve Ordinance No 5168 levying property taxes for
collection in 2012
6B — RESOLUTION NO. 3156 AMENDING CITY RATES AND FEES A VITH ACTION): Beckv
Hasart Financial Services Director, summarized that each year as part of the budget process, the
various City departments review their charges, rates, and fees for services and make
recommendations on any changes needed Rate Table "A" includes recommended changes to fees
charged by the Fire Department and Parks Department
Vice - President Brockus opened the Public Hearing for comment on the proposed resolution to
amend City rates and fees
Don Stauff suggested that the City would encourage more residents to fix their homes if the City
charged a set -fee for permits
Vice- President Brockus closed the Public Hearing to further comment from the public on the
proposed resolution to amend City rates and fees, and opened discussion to the Council
06:32:12 Motion to approve the resolution was made by Robinson, and seconded by Wofford,
Questions and comments were received by Robinson, Runyon, Wofford, Arends, Wheeler, and
McConnell
06.51:58 M /S /C /U (Robinson/Wofford) Move to approve Resolution No 3156 of the City Council of
the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending rates and fees established in Resolution No 3128
regarding fees for services relating to the Department of Financial Services, Municipal Court,
Department of Community Development, Police Department, Fire Department, Parks & Recreation
Department, Department of Public Works & Utilities, and Bremerton Kitsap Access Television
(BKAT)
6C — TO CONSIDER AND RECEIVE COMMENT ON ORDINANCE NO. 5169 AMENDING SECTION
3.82.020 OF THE BREMERTON MUNICIPAL CODE BMC RELATING TO THE COMMERCIAL
PARKING TAX (NO ACTION) Becky Hasart Financial Services Director, stated that as part of the
2012 Budget, it is proposed to raise the parking tax rate from 10% to 15% This increase would be a
direct revenue stream to the Streets Fund and could potentially realize an increase of $150,000
overall Staff presented this ordinance tonight for informational purposes only and for consideration
as part of the budget public hearing this evening
City Council Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Page 3 of 4
Vice - President Brockus opened the Public Hearing for comment on the proposed ordinance relating
to the commercial parking tax With no comments, the Public Hearing was closed to the public, and
discussion was opened to the Council
Questions and comments were received by McConnell, Runyon, and Wheeler
Vice - President Brockus then closed the Public Hearing There is no action required on this
ordinance until adoption of the 2012 Budget ordinance, scheduled for December 7, 2011
6D — TO CONSIDER AND RECEIVE COMMENT ON ORDINANCE NO. 5170 AMENDING
CHAPTER 3.50 OF THE BREMERTON MUNICIPAL CODE BMC RELATING TO UTILITY TAXES
FOR WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER UTILITIES (NO ACTION) Beckv Hasart
Financial Services Director, pointed out that as part of the 2012 Budget, it is proposed to raise the
utility tax portion of PILOT on Wastewater and Stormwater from 9 5% to 14% and to decrease the tax
on Water from 9 5% to 8 5% These changes would decrease total PILOT to the Water Fund from
15 5% to 14 5 %, but increase the total PILOT to the Wastewater and Stormwater Funds from 15 5%
to 20% Staff is presenting this ordinance tonight for informational purposes only and for
consideration as part of the budget public hearing this evening
Vice - President Brockus opened the Pubic Hearing for comment on the proposed ordinance relating
to utility taxes for water, wastewater, and stormwater utilities With no comments, the Public Hearing
was closed to the public, and discussion was opened to the Council
Questions and comments were received by Runyon, McConnell, Wofford, McDonald (also adding
comments on behalf of President Maupm regarding the PILOT), Wheeler, and Arends
Vice - President Brockus then closed the Public Hearing There is no action required on this
ordinance until adoption of the 2012 Budget ordinance, scheduled for December 7, 2011
GENERAL BUSINESS
7A RENEWAL OF; ANNUAL ADMIRAL THEARE GO 149 ADM! AL THr E ATIRW
Item postponed until December 7 There were no other General Business items
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Nick Wofford with cold and wet weather predicted, citizens were urged to keep storm drains clear
Carol Arend s responded to earlier comments noting that lengthy discussions are held by the Council
whenever an increase in taxes or fees are considered, and that the Council takes these types of
issues very seriously
Dianne Robinson announced the Black Historical Society of Kitsap County would be hosting tea and
poetry reading as part of the First Friday Art Walk on December 2 from 6 00 to 7 30 PM, and on
Saturday from 2 00 to 4 00 PM
Greg Wheeler thanked Finance Director Becky Hasart for attending his District 5 Community Meeting
during her own time to lead a discussion on the City's proposed 2012 Budget He also reminded the
public that this was 2011 Homeless Week and there are many activities taking place to bring more
awareness to their plight
Roy Runyon also thanked Ms Hasart, as well as Council Member Wheeler for hosting the public
meeting He pointed out the 2012 Budget includes the City's vision, and encouraged removal of
campaign signs now that the election is over
City Council Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Page 4 of 4
Cecil McConnell reminded the public that Mr Runyon was the deciding "no" at the last car tabs vote
of the Transportation Benefit District
Adam Brockus looked forward to WinterFest on Friday, December 2 which coincides with the First
Friday Artwalk, and encouraged anyone who has information about missing teen Miguel Scott to
contact the Kitsap County Sheriff's Office at (360) 337 -5616, The Eagles F O E at 6` & Washington
would be hosting a Thanksgiving dinner for the community, and invited residents to his next District 3
Meeting on Monday, November 28 in the Meeting Chambers from 6 30 to 8 00 PM to participate in a
discussion on the Shoreline Master Program and 2012 Budget Issues
Vice - President Brockus adjourned the Council Meeting at 7 25 PM
Prepared and Submitted by
LORI SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest
SHANNON CORK Interim City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
W M SC Is cg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 6Cir
■■ eeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
For meeting of COUNCIL MEETING Date - DeCe — wJoer - 7,
Department City Council
'&td e,4 WorKSS6op Presenter _Will Mau Din, President
N vC WI.�er a I , zto I( Phone 360 473 -5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A
APPROVALS: N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ?Qf Consent A ends ❑General Business
❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT ,r
COUNCIL ACTION: [I Approve ❑ Deny Table
❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
November 21, 2011
The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the First
Floor Meeting Chambers of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER, 345 6 th Street, Bremerton,
Washington, Monday, November 21, 2011, at 4 00 PM, with Council President Will Maupin
presiding Council Members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Greg
Wheeler, Roy Runyon, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Jim McDonald Legislative
Assistant Lori Smith was present to provide staff support
President Maupin emphasized that the Special Meeting was open to the public, however there
would be no opportunities for input or participation, and that no action will be taken
1 Exempt Closed Session — Under RCW 42 30 140(4)(b), an update was provided on
"Labor Negotiations and Proceedings"
2 Budget Workshop — Continued discussion was held regarding the City of Bremerton
2012 Proposed Budget, including proposals for changes
With no further business, President Maupin adjourned the Special Meeting at approximately
815 PM
Prepared and Submitted by
LORI SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest
SHANNON CORK Interim City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WMSCIscg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 5H
•■ eeeeeeeereee � eeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeee eee�eeeeeee��eo�eeeeeeeeeesoeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeee �
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
For meeting of COUNCIL MEETING Date be,C.,? KfoP - 7, aD
��--
L� "" ,� Department City Council
5 S�SS►dh Presenter Will Maupin, President
N oil ( 3 lo ll Phone (360) 473 -5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes
FISCAL IMPACTS: N/A
APPROVALS: N/A
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented
STUDY SESSION ACTION: Consent A enda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
:0
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES
November 30, 2011
A Study Session of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the First Floor
Meeting Chambers of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER, 345 6 th Street, Bremerton,
Washington, Wednesday, November 30, 2011, at 5 00 PM, with Council President Will Maupin
presiding Council Members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Greg
Wheeler, Roy Runyon, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Jim McDonald Legislative Assistant
Lori Smith was present to provide staff support
President Maupin emphasized that the Study Session was open to the public, however there
would be no opportunities for input or participation, that no action will be taken, and the content of
these items is subject to change
A NO DISCUSSION PLANNED - The following items are budgeted items or have been reviewed
by the appropriate Council Committee, and will be placed on the December 7, 2011 Council
Meeting Agenda unless otherwise stated
1 Appointment of Will Maupin to the Bremerton Housing Authority Board of Commissioners
effective January 1, 2012 — Mayor Patty Lent Consent Agenda
2 Reappointment of Kelli Lambert to the Planning Commission — Mayor Patty Lent Consent
Agenda
3 Interlocal Agreement KC 450 -11 with Kitsap County for Mutual Aid in Processing of Bio-
solids from their respective Wastewater Treatment Plants — Pat Coxon, Wastewater
Treatment Plant Manager, Public Works & Utilities Department, and Jim McDonald, Public
Works Committee Chair Consent Agenda
4 Public Works Construction Contract for 4 th Street Sewer Lining for the Park Avenue Plaza
Project Phase II — Gary Sexton, Redevelopment Projects Administrator, Executive
Department Consent Agenda
B FULL DISCUSSION ITEMS
5 Renewal of Annual Admiral Theatre Commitment to the Admiral Theatre Foundation —
Becky Hasart, Financial Services Director, and Nick Wofford, Finance Committee Chair
General Business
6 Mutual Aid Agreement between the City of Bremerton and participating Kitsap County Law
Enforcement Agencies — Police Chief Craig Rogers, and Jim McDonald, Public Safety &
Parks Committee Chair Consent Agenda
7 Proposed resolution ratifying Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies with 2011 amendments
as revised and adopted by the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners on November 14,
2011 — Andrea Spencer, Department of Community Development Director, Mary McClure,
KRCC Executive Director, and Greg Wheeler, Planning Committee Chair General
Business
8 Proposed resolution to establish January 18, 2012 as a Hearing Date to vacate Broadway
Avenue from 13 to 16 Streets — Gunnar Fridnksson, Engineering, Public Works &
Utilities Department, and Jim McDonald, Public Works Committee Chair Consent Agenda
9 Proposed ordinance creating Chapter 11 18 of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC)
entitled "Addressing" — Ned Lever, Engineering, Public Works & Utilities Department, and
Jim McDonald, Public Works Committee Chair General Business
City Council Study Session Minutes
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Page 2 of 2
10 Interlocal Agreement with King County for Regional Aerial Mapping — Ned Lever,
Engineering, Public Works & Utilities Department, and Jim McDonald, Public Works
Committee Chair Consent Agenda
11 Approval of a $25,000 grant -match to be used to fund a Project Manager for the
development, planning, and coordination of the Youth Wellness Campus — Mayor Patty
Lent General Business
12 Exempt Closed Session — Under RCW 42 30 140(4)(b) to discuss "Labor Negotiations
and Proceedings"
13 Budget Workshop — Continued discussion on the City of Bremerton 2012 Proposed
Budget — Becky Hasart, Financial Services Director, and Caroline Tompson, Budget
Analyst
ADJOURNMENT OF STUDY SESSION
President Maupin adjourned the Study Session at 8 50 PM
Prep d and Submitte y
LORI SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest
SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WMSCIscg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 45
SUBJECT: Appointment to the Bremerton Study Session Date ON 3 0 , ao ( l
Housing Authority Board of Commissioners COUNCIL MEETING Date D2.0 7, go I I
Department Executive
Presenter Mayor Patty Lent
Phone 4735266
SUMMARY: There is a vacancy on the Bremerton Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and it
is recommended that Will Maupin be appointed to fill the vacancy effective 1/1/12
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount)
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Motion to confirm the appointment of Will Maupin to the Bremerton Housing Authority Board of
Commissioners effective 1/1/12
STUDY SESSION ACTION: [6 Co ent e d ❑ General Business El Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT '
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 11/02/2011
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Reappointment to the Planning Study Session Date November 30, 2011
Commission COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
Department Executive
Presenter Mayor Lent
Phone 473.5266
SUMMARY: Kelli Lambert's term on the Planning Commission will expire on December 31, 2011 It
is recommended she be reappointed to another term ending December 31, 2015
ATTACHMENTS: Application for reappointment available in the Department of Community
Development
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) No Fiscal Impacts
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to re omt Kelli Lambert to the Planning Commission with a
term that will end December 31, 2015
STUDY SESSION ACTION: Con nt Agenda ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT R
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ able ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 11/02/2011
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 5
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with Kitsap Study Session Date November 30, 2011
County for Mutual Aid in Processing of COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
Biosolids from their respective Wastewater Department PW &U — WWTP
Treatment Plants Presenter Pat Coxon
Phone 4735448
SUMMARY: The proposed Interlocal Agreement is for the City of Bremerton & Kitsap County to
provide mutual aid in the processing of the biosolids from their respective wastewater treatment
plants, as the need may arise
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement KC 450 -11
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) There is no budget impact for this agreement The
attached ILA does not commit the city to any fiscal impact unless we request services from Kitsap County The
ILA does allow that we can request an estimate for the services prior to commitment, which would allow us to
confirm that the costs can be absorbed within our existing budget authority
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to appro Interlocal Agreement KC 450 -11 between Kitsap
County and the City of Bremerton and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement
with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented
STUDY SESSION ACTION:] Cons nt Agend7 ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT J
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 11/02/2011
KC 450 -11
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
KITSAP COUNTY AND BREMERTON
FOR MUTUAL AID IN PROCESSING OF BIOSOLIDS FROM SEWER TREATMENT
PLANTS
This Interlocal Agreement is made and entered into pursuant to the provisions of Chapter
39 34 RCW by and between the County of Kitsap (hereinafter County) and the City of
Bremerton (hereinafter City)
WHEREAS, both the County and the City have wastewater treatment plants that require
processing of biosolids Said plants may from time to time require maintenance or other
activities that may disrupt normal biosolids processing and require aid from other processing
facilities
WHEREAS, the County, as well as the City will benefit from cooperation in processing of
biosolids,
WHEREAS, Chapter 39 34 RCW provides that local jurisdictions may enter into cooperative
agreements for their mutual benefit,
NOW, THEREFORE, the County and the City, through their respective legislative bodies, do
hereby agree as follows
1 PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT: The purpose of this agreement is to provide for
cooperation between County and City in wastewater treatment by assisting one another
in the,processing of biosolids on an as available basis
2 ADMINISTRATION OF AGREEMENT: Kitsap County Public Works Department will
administer this agreement for Kitsap County Bremerton Public Works and Utilities
Department will administer this agreement for the City
3 DURATION OF AGREEMENT: This agreement shall take effect upon execution of the
agreement by both County and City and shall remain in effect for five years from date of
execution by the County, provided, however, that this agreement may be renewed after
the fifth year by mutual agreement of the County and City
4 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT: Either County or City may terminate this agreement
by giving ten days written notice to the other party
5 ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY: Any property acquired by County pursuant to this
agreement shall remain property of County, and any property acquired by City pursuant
to this agreement shall remain property of City
6 QUALITY OF PRODUCT: Each entity is guaranteed the sludge /biosolids received has
has met Chapter 173 -308 WAC requirements for preliminary treatment
7 REQUEST BY "ENTITY: Whenever the County or the City(requesting entity) desires to
the other (processing entity) to process biosolids for them, each shall provide at least 30
days prior notice for scheduled activities Emergency situations do not require prior
notice
8 REVIEW OF REQUEST: The request will be reviewed by the processing entity to verify
the associated treatment plant can accommodate the request
9 APPROVAL OF REQUEST: Routine activity requests shall be reviewed and a
response given regarding the ability to process the requested biosolids within 10 days of
the request Emergency requests shall be processed as soon as possible
9 REIMBURSEMENT: The requesting entity shall reimburse the processing entity for all
costs of direct and indirect labor (including fringe benefits), administration, equipment
rental, engineering, materials and supplies for the work performed pursuant to this
agreement If requested, the processing entity shall provide estimated costs for the
requested services prior to the work The requesting entity shall reimburse the
processing entity at the rate determined by the processing entity The processing entity
shall submit a statement to the requesting entity after performance or delivery and
within thirty (30) days the requesting entity shall remit thereon
10 HOLD HARMLESS: Each party agrees to defend and indemnify the other party and its
officials, officers, employees and agents for all claims, liabilities, damages, expenses
and suits arising from or relating to the performance of this Agreement by the indemnitor
or its officials, officers, employees and agents
11 INSURANCE: Either party may require, as a condition of performance of Public Works
and /or provision of equipment, that the other party obtain public liability insurance
naming County /City as an additional insured
c
This agreement shall be filed with the County Auditor following execution by all parties
DATED this , day of , 2011
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON
City of Bremerton
Patty Lent, Mayor Charlotte Garrido, Chair
ATTEST Robert Gelder, Commissioner
DANA DANIELS
Clerk of the Board Josh Brown, Commissioner
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
r■ ■rrr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr■ •• rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrri
Co rr1 (�E) oil 1 y
S JECT: Park Avenue PlaziiProject Study Session Date leKWeil 1 0 /11
Phase II Construction Contracts, Trenching COUNCIL MEETING Date _
for Utilities, Park Ave & 4"' St Department Executive l 1 "7/ 11
Improvements Garage Screening. Planters, Presenter Gary Sexton
Brick Venee Sewer Main LiEMJ Phone 360 -981 -1025
SUMMARY Park Avenue Plaza Phase II (EDA funding with matching funds) work for six sub - category
scopes of work are out to bid for the following
A Fourth Street West. United Way easement Trenching (PSE Phase A) — estimate $140,000 This work is for
the utility trenching from the 4 In & Park intersection to the east side of United Way then south to the alley edge
for undergroundin the alley utilities that service United Way (Schedule 74 work)
B Park nue/4 St and Park Ave intersection — estimate $475,000 This scope of work includes new
sidewalks, planting strips, pavers, asphalt paving, street lighting, bulb outs and the raised granite compass and
anchor intersection at the comer of 4 St and Park Ave
C Park Ave Plaza, Brick Veneer Installation — estimate $105,000 This work scope is for the brick veneer on
the Burwell Street side of the above grade parking garage The work is east of the SeeFdm Cinema
D Park Avenue Plaza Park. Steel Filter Screening — estimate $65,000 This work scope is the in -fill parking
garage steel filter screening for the two above grade levels of the Park Ave Plaza Parking Garage fronting
Burwell St east of the SeeFil
E Fourth Street Sewer Lining — Estimate $175,000 This scope of work is to line the interior of the dilapidated,
old sewer line extending on 4 St from Pacific Ave to Park Avenue The work will be done before, and in
antici of street sca in this same area
ark Ave Plaza Planter/Burwell — estimate $30,000 This scope of work is for the construction of planters
for trees and grasses located on the Park Ave Plaza Parking Garage site, facing Burwell, east of the SeeFdm
Cinema and between the existing sidewalk and the parking garage
ATTACHMENTS: Scope of work for * E contract standard public works construction contract
master document j 8;d Tab Shf-f- -(a 4 �0v )
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount). The necessary funds and program have been
previously approved by the Council and appropriated in Park Avenue Plaza Phase it (EDA funding
and match) in fund 306.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY.
FINANCE DIRECTOR.
RECOMMENDED MOTION PleAgp see_ e 2
STUDY SESSION ACTION: kC n nt Agenda General Business ❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form uod arad 411 Ann„ I e'1 2
r
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS:
Approved October 19
✓ A Move to 'approve the Fourth Street West, United Way Easement Trenching g PSE
Phase A ) — Public Works Construction Contract to SOUTH BAY EXCAVATING,
INC. in the amount of $52,830.00 and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the
agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented
Approved October 19
✓ B Move to approve the Park Avenue /4 h St and Park Ave Intersection Improvements
Public Works Construction Contract to SERPANOK CONSTRUCTION, INC. in the
amount of $550,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement
with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented
Approved November 2
✓ C Move to approve the Park Ave Plaza, Brick Veneer Installation Public Works
Construction Contract to COULTAS GENERAL CONTRACTING in the amount of
$70,958.00 and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with
substantially the same terms and conditions as presented
Approved October 19
✓ D Move to approve the Park Avenue Plaza Park, Steel Filter Screening Public Works
Construction Contract to SERPANOK CONSTRUCTION, INC in the amount of
$99,950.00 and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with
substantially the same terms and conditions as presented
Recommended Motion for December 7:
E Move to approve the Fourth Street Sewer Lining Public Works Construction Contract to
INSTITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC in the amount of $157.500.00 and authorize the
Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as
presented
Approved October 19
✓ F Move to approve the Park Ave Plaza Planter /Burwell Public Works Construction
Contract to COMBINED CONSTRUCTION, INC. in the amount of $34,200.00 and
authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same
terms and conditions as presented
CITY OF BREMERTON
BID TABULATION
BID TITLE 4 Street Sewer Lining OPENED BY 5g gA)AjoAj eo& r A/
DATE OPENED 11 1111�oll TIME OPENED ; p RECORDED BY # ye - r o
NAME OF BIDDER BOND BASE BID AMOUNT SALES TAX TOTAL
N S TI T(JL �d vN� No L b l E 5 ..1 -/�f L' • l„�7 J�a"f� /-j7 500 !
SUMMARY COMMENTS
TOTAL BID
APPARENT LOW BIDDER ENGINEER ESTIMATE
SECOND LOW BIDDER
THIRD LOW BIDDER
copf
PARK & 4 STREET - PHASE TWO
CITY OF BREMERTON INVITATION TO BID
EDA Award 07 -01 -06590
INVITATION TO BID
BREMERTON "PARK & 4T" STREET - PHASE TWO
4 STREET SEWER MAIN LINING, BREMERTON. WASHINGTON
Bremerton, Washington
Bids Due 17 October, 2011
City of Bremerton, will receive sealed bids for the 4* Street Sewer Main Lining, Bremerton, WA 98337
The western portion of the site remains an active construction site, follow safety protocol when visiting
Bids shall be labeled Attention: Gary Sexton, City of Bremerton, Confidential - Bid for the City of
Bremerton's Park Plaza Garage Brick Veneer Installation
City of Bremerton will receive bids Finance Department 345 6th Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337
until 3.00 PM, October 17,201L The bids will be opened and publicly read aloud immediately following
All interested parties are invited to attend In accordance with RCW 39.30.060, bidders are to provide list
of principal subcontractors within 24 hours of Bid Submittal
Bids received after the specified time will not be accepted. It is the sole responsibility of Bidders to deliver
their bid to the designated place at the designated time Oral, telephonic, faxed or emailed bids are invalid
and will not receive consideration
Contractors may obtain Bidding and Contract Documents by
• Emailing PJ Santos @ pj loraxpartners corn or viewing posted document on City of Bremerton
web site www.ci.bremerton.wa.us "Public Notices & News"
The City of Bremerton reserves the right to reject any or all bids, and waive any informalities or
irregularities in the bidding
Page 1 of 1
PARK & 4TH STREET - PHASE TWO
CITY OF BREMERTON SCOPE OF WORK
EDA Award No 07 -01 -06590
4h Street Sewer Main Lining - Scope of Work.
1. Furnish and install complete, cured-in-place pipe (C1PP)
The CONTRACTOR shall provide all materials, labor, equipment, and
services necessary for bypass pumping and/or diversion of sewage flows,
cleaning of sewer to be lined, finer installation, reconnection of service
connections, and final television inspection and testing of lined pipe
system. Copy of the television inspection of the sewer to be lined is
available from the owner
Pase 1 of 1
PARK & 4TH STREET - PHASE TWO
CITY OF BREMERTON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
EDA Award No. 07 -01 -06590
Sewer Main Lining on 4th Street in Bremerton, Washington, Construction
Documents:
1. Exceltech Consulting, Inc - Cured -In -Place Pipe Lateral Technical
Specification: Page 1 -4.
2. Exceltech Consulting, Inc - Cured -In -Place Pipe Technical Specification- Page
1 -8.
3. Exceltech Consulting, Inc - 4th Street Sewer Rehabilitation sheet SS1.0
4. EDA Contracting Provisions for Construction Projects
5. Davis Bacon Washington Wage Rates for Kitsap County
( www.gpo.gov /davisbacon /WA.htmI)
Nap i of 1
nm,m Iw,. M�MYiW�f.wgliy .+w, o�.r
-a _)))
ID
N
f � i
. t•
R� •� L
0
s �e
c
CITY OF BREMERTON
tom/) s PARK AVE PLAZA
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
18 IT" ¢TGTTT CTWCD DCYADOITAMU B X E t@ C h
i
PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is entered into between the City of Bremeiton a Washington
Municipal Corporation ("City "), and (' Contractor' ), whose
mailing address is
The parties agree as follows
1. CONTRACTOR SERVICES. The Contractor shall perform the following services
for the City
2. TIME OF COMPLETION. Contractor shall complete the work within 21 calendai
days from the date of issuance of the City's Notice to Proceed
3. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Contractor the total amount of
$ , plus any applicable Washington State Sales Tax. for the work
and seivices contemplated in this agreement The Contiactor shall invoice the City monthly The
City will pay foi the portion of the work described in the invoice that has been completed by the
Contractor and appioved by the City The City payment shall not constitute a waiver of the City's
right to final inspection and acceptance of the project
A Performance Bond Pursuant to Chapter 39 08 RCW, the Contractor shall
provide the City a performance bond for the full conti act amount to be in
effect until sixty (60) days after the date of final acceptance, of until receipt
of all necessary releases from the State Department of Revenue and the State
Department of Labor and Industries and until settlement of any liens filed
under Chapter 60 28 RCW, whichever is later
B Retainage The City shall hold back a retainage in the amount of five peicent
(5 %) of any and all payments made to contractor for a period of sixty (60)
days after the date of final acceptance, or until receipt of all necessary
ieleases from the State Department of Revenue and the State Department of
Labor & Industries and until settlement of any liens filed under Chapter 60 28
RCW, whichever is later
C Defective or Unauthonzed Work The City reserves its right to withhold
payment fiom Contractor for any defective or unauthorized woik
4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contiactor is and shall be at all times acting as
an independent contractoi and not as an employee of the City The Contractor shall secure at its
expense and shall be iesponsible foi all payments of income tax, social secui ity, state industr ral
insurance compensation, unemployment compensation, and all othei payroll deductions foi the
Contractor, officer, agents, employees and sub - contractors. The Contractor shall also secure all
applicable business licenses, if required, in connection with the contract services, including all
required licenses for Contractor's officers, agents, employees and sub - contractors
5. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this agreement at the convenience of the
City
6. PREVAILING WAGES. Contractor shall file a "Statement of Intent to Pay
Prevailing Wages,' with the State of Washington Department of Labor & Industries prior to
commencing the Contract work Contractor shall pay prevailing wages and comply with Chapter
39 12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as well as any other applicable prevarlrng wage rate
provisions Davis -Bacon wage rates are to be used for this project The latest prevailing wage rate
revision issued by the Department of Labor and Industries is attached
7. CHANGES. The City may issue a written or oral work change d»ective for any
change in the Contract work during the performance of this agreement If the Contractor
determines, for any reason, that a change order is necessary Contractor must submit a written
change order request to the City's project manager within two (2) business days of the date the
Contractor knew or should have known of the facts and events giving rise to the requested change
If the City determines that the change increases or decreases the Contractor's costs or time for
performance, the City will make an equitable adjustment If the Contractor disagrees with the
equitable adjustment the Contractor must complete the change order work, however, the Contractor
may elect to protest the adjustment The City will evaluate all protests, provided the procedures in
this section are followed If the City determines that a protest is valid, the City will adjust payment
for work or time by an equitable adjustment No adjustment will be made for an invalid protest
A Contractor's Duty to Complete Protested Work In spite of any protest, the
Contractor shall proceed promptly with the work as the City has ordered with
the retained right to file a claim
8. CLAIMS. The Contractor shall give written notice to the City of all claims other
than change orders within fourteen (14) calendar days of the occurrence of the events giving rise to
the claims Any claim for damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of time.
whether under this agreement or otherwise. shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by
the Contractor unless a timely written claim is made in strict accordance with the applicable
provisions of this agreement, or, if (and only if) no such provision is applicable, unless that claim is
set forth in detail in writing and received by the City within seven (7) calendar days from the date
Contractor knew, or should have known, of the facts giving rise to the claim
FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM
WITHIN THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS
ARISING IN ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT CLAIM
OR CAUSED BY THAT DELAY
Contractor must, in any event file any claim or bring any suit arising from or connected
with this agreement within 120 calendar days from the date the contract work is complete
9. WARRANTY. The Contractor shall correct all defects in workmanship and
materials within one year from the date of the Contractor's acceptance of the City s final payment
under this contract When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall
extend for one year form the date such correction is completed and accepted by the City The
Contractoi shall begin to correct any defects within seven (7) calendar days of its receipt of notice
from the City of the defect If the Contractor does not accomplish the corrections within a
reasonable time, the City may complete the corrections and the Contractor shall pay all costs
incurred by the City in order to accomplish the correction
10. INDEMNIFICATION. Contractor shall defend. indemnify and hold the City its
officers, officials employees, agents and volunteers harmless fiom anv and all rla,mc ,,,,,,,,Pc
damages, losses of suits including all legal costs and attorney fees arising out of or in connection
with the performance of this agreement except for iinJuiies and damages caused by the City's
negligence
The City's inspection or acceptance of any of Contractor's work when completed shall not
be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification
Should a court of competent juiisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW
4 24 115, then in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons of
damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Cohtiactoi and
the City, its officials. employees, agents and volunteers, the Contractor's liability hereunder shall be
only to the extent of the Conti actor s negligence
IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS
INDEMNIFICATION CONSTITUTES THE CONTRACTORS WAIVER OF IMMUNITY
UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS
INDEMNIFICATION THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY
NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER
The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement
11. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall piocuie and maintain for the duration of this
agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property that may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the Contiact work by the Contractoi, its agents,
representatives, employees of subcontiactors
Before beginning the work on the project described in this agreement, the Contractor shall
provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing
A Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1.000,000 combined
single limit per accident for bodily injury and piopeity damage, and
B Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with
limits no less than $2 000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and
$2,000,000 aggregate foi personal injury, bodily injury and property damage
Coverage shall include but not be limited to blanket contractual.
products /completed operations /broad form property damage, explosion, collapse
and underground (XCU) if applicable. and employei's liability
C Endorsements in accordance \\ith Right of Way peimits
Any payment of deductible of self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the
Contractoi
The City reserves the i ight to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies
The City, its officials employees, agents and volunteers shall be named as an additional
insured on the insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Contractor and a
copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of
Insurance
The Contractors insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply
separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respects to the
limits of the insurer's liability
The Contractor's insurance shall be piimary insurance as respects the City, and the City
shall be given thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt
requested, of any cancellation, suspension or mates tal change in coverage
12. MISCELLANEOUS.
A Nondisc>>mination In the hiring of employees For the performance of work
under this Agreement or any sub - contract hereunder, the Contractor, its sub-
contractors, of any person acting on behalf of such Contiactoi of sub-
contractor shall not, by reason of lace, religion color, sex. national ongin. of
the presence of any sensory, mental, physical disability, or sexual orientation
discriminate against any person who is qualified and available to perform the
work to which the employment relates
B Compliance with Laws Contractor shall comply with all federal state and
local laws, rules and regulations throughout every aspect in the performance
of this agreement
C Work Perfoimed at Contractor's Risk Contractor shall take all precautions
necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and
subcontractors in the performance of this agreement All work shall be done
at Contractor's own risk, acid Contractoi shall be responsible for any loss of
or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held fol use in
connection with the work
D Nonwaivei of Breach The failure of the City to insist upon strict
performance of any of the terms and rights contained herein, or to exercise
any option herein conferred in one or more instances, shall not be constructed
to be a waiver or relinquishment of those terms and rights and they shall
remain in full force and effect
E Governing Law This agreement shall be governed and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington If any dispute arises
between the City and Contractor under any of the provisions of this
agreement, resolution of that dispute shall be available only through the
jurisdiction, venue and i ules of the Kitsap County Super for Court, Kitsap
County, Washington.
F. Attorney s Fees To the extent not inconsistent with RCW 39 04 240. in any
claim of lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this
agreement, each party shall be responsible for payment of its own legal costs
and attorney's fees incuned in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit.
however, nothing in this subsection shall limit the City's right to
indemnification under Section 10 of this agreement
G Written Notice All communications regarding this agreement shall be sent
to the pauses at the addresses listed on the c,annfi rP man,* ^4 rt—
unless otherwise notified Any written notice shall become effecti"e upon
delivery, but in any event three (3) calendar days after the date of mailing b�
registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to
the addressee at the address stated on this agreement
H Assignment Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without
the w>>tten consent of the City shall be void
I Modification No waiver, alteration. of modification of any of the piovisions
of this agreement shall be binding unless in wirting and signed by a duly
authorized representative of the City and Contractor
J Severability If any one or mole sections, sub - sections of sentences of this
agreement are held to be unconstitutional o> invalid. that decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this agreement and the
remaindei shall remain in full force and effect
K Entire Apareement The written provisions and terms of this agi eement,
together with any attached Exhibits, supersede all prior verbal statements by
any representative of the City, and those statements shall not be construed as
foiming a part of or altering in any manner this agreement This agreement
and any attached Exhibits contain the entire agreement between the parties
Should any language in any Exhibit to this agreement conflict with any
language contained in this agreement, the terms of this agreement shall
prevail
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below have executed this agreement
CONTRACTOR THE CITY OF BREMERTON
Print Name Print Name
Title Title
DATE DATE
Notices to be sent to: Notices to be sent to;
CONTRACTOR CITY OF BREMERTON
Atten Gary Sexton
345 6 "' Street, Suite 600
Biemeilon WA 98337
(360)
(360) (facsimile)
PARK & 4TH STREET PHASE TWO
CITY OF BREMERTON GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
EDA Award No 07 -01 -06590
General Requirements -
A Price and Payment Procedures
1 Substitution Procedures- Prior to bidding contractors may provide Substitution
Requests via email to or 1 t it , 1 ,, ,w „_ •, ���
within 3 days of Bid, approved submittals will be noted in addendum
Substitutions represent proposed product has been investigated and determined
equal or superior to that specified.
2 Schedule of Values - Before 1s' application for payment submit Schedule of
Values for approval Schedule of Value should include all major work activities
and include labor and materials
3 Progress Payment Procedures - Contractor to provide invoice to Brian Fyall by
end of month, set up time for site walk through to confirm billing percentage
complete. Contractor to include lien releases from prior month with subsequent
applications.
4. Certified Payrolls are to be provided at the end of each month
B Administrative Requirements
1 Project Coordination- General Contractor is to coordinate scheduling, submittals,
and work General Contractor to coordinate testing & inspection, utility
connections, City inspection and final approval
2 Project Meeting - Weekly construction meeting are to be held General
Contractor to take and distribute notes Agenda to include three week look
ahead schedule; outstanding RFI's and submittals, status of payments,
3 Construction Progress Schedule - Provide critical path schedule showing major
activities and milestones Update schedule if critical path work is behind my
more than 2 weeks.
4 Communications - Address all RFI's and Submittal to Brian Fyall RFI's to be
numbered consecutive, assume two week turn around for all RFI's.
5 Submittal procedure - Provide shop drawings and submittals as required by
Contract Documents, provide 6 hard copies of drawings and 3 hard copies of
product information Where submittal is design -build provide engineered
stamped drawing by registered engineer in the State of Washington
C Quality Requirements
1 Regulator Requirements - Contractor to comply will laws, ordinances, rules,
regulations as required by City of Bremerton and the State of Washington in the
construction of the noted project
2. Quality Control - General Contractor to maintain quality control over suppliers,
manufacturers, products, services, site conditions and workmanship to produce
specified quality
3. Testing and inspection - Owner will contract for special inspection services for
geotech and construction testing and inspection General Contractor is to
coordinate inspection times directly with inspection agency.
PARK & 4T" STREET PHASE TWO
CITY OF BREMERTON GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
EDA Award No 07 -01 -06590
D Temporary Facilities and Controls
1. Temporary utilities - General Contractor is responsible for all required
temporary utilities (electrical, telephone, water, sewer and storm run off)
2 Field offices - General Contractor shall provide temporary field offices and sheds
are required to complete construction
3. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic control - Provide safe and expeditious
movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic on adjacent streets, alley and
sidewalks Pay for City uses fees as required by City
4. Temporary barriers and enclosures - Furnish, install and maintain suitable
security fencing and other protective and sheltering devices as required to
complete the work.
5 Security - Protect premises from entry by unauthorized persons Protect
completed work, stored product and construction equipment from theft and
vandalism
6. Temporary controls - Provide and maintain controls using methods, equipment
and temporary construction to protect site and related areas from. air, water
and soil pollution, waste generation, other irritating and harmful activities Keep
adjacent sites clean and free of debris
7 Safety - Comply with State of Washington and City of Bremerton safety laws and
requirements
8 Noise control - take reasonable measures to suppress noise from work
operations
E Product Requirements
1 Product storage & handling - Products, materials and equipment incorporated
into the work shall be new unless otherwise noted Provide for protection of all
products, materials and equipment stored on site or off site
F Execution and Closeout Requirements
1 Field engineering - Provide field engineering survey services to ensure there are
no encroachments on adjacent properties
2 Protection of adjacent construction - protect all existing properties from work
under this contract
3 Cutting and patching - General Contractor is responsible for cutting, fitting and
patching as required to complete the work
4 Construction waste management & disposal - Project is not LEED certified,
however final waste generation performance goals are 95% for salvage / recycle
5 Final cleaning - At completion all areas must be cleaned and ready for occupancy
/ use as intended
6 Closeout procedures - General Contractor to notify Owner when project is ready
for inspection and punch list GC to provide to Owner their own pre -punch list
and outstanding items (i a final clean, operation and maintenance data,
warranty)
PARK & 4T" STREET PHASE TWO
CITY OF BREMERTON GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
EDA Award No 07 -01 -06590
7 Operation and maintenance data - At completion of lob and prior to release of
retention General Contractor to provide operation and maintenance manuals for
project
8 Warranties - See contract for warranty language and duration
9 Project Record Documents - Provide record set of all drawings with noted
changes Provide final Change Order and contract modifications Design build as-
builts
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
TO ENSURE EQUAL EMPLO $ MENT OPPORTUNITY
(EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246 AND 41 CFR PART 60 -4)
The following Notice shall be included in, and shall be a part of all solicitations for ofters and
bids on all Federal and federally assisted consti action contracts or subcontracts in excess of
$10.000
The Offeror's or Bidder's attention is called to the "Equal Opportunity Clause" and the "Standard
Federal Equal Employment Oppoi tunny Consti action Contract Specifications" set forth herein
The goals and timetables for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terns for
the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the coveied area
are as follows
Timetables Goals for minority Coals for female
participattii 2 f or each trade participation for each trade
% 6 9%
These goals aie applicable to all the Contractor's construction work (whethei or not it is
Federal or federally assisted) performed in the covered area if the contiactor performs
constiuction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, it shall
apply the goals established for such geographical area where the work is actually
performed With regard to this second area, the contractor also is subject to the goals for
both its fedeially involved and non federally involved construction
The Contractor's compliance with the Executive Order and the iegulations in 41 CFR Part
60 -4 shall be based on its implementation of the Equal Opportunity Clause. specific
affiimative action obligations requiied by the specifications set forth in 41 CFR 60-
4 ;(a) and its efforts to meet the goals The hours of minority and female employment
and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in
each trade and the contiactor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and
women evenly on each of its piojects The transfer of minority of female employees or
trainees from Contractor to Contractor or from project to project for the sole purpose of
meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, the Executive Order,
and the regulations in 41 CFR Part 60 -4 Compliance with the goals will be measured
against the total work hours performed
The Contractor shall piovide wi itten notification to the Director of the Office of Federal
Contract Compliance Progiams within 10 working days of award of any consti action
subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract
iesulting from this solicitation The notification shall list the name, address and telephone
number of the subcontiactoi, employei identification number of the subcontractoi.
estimated dollar amount of the subcontract, estimated starting and completion dates of the
subcontract; and the geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed
As used in this Notice, and in the contract resulting fiom this solicitation, the " coveied
aiea" is
State of
County of
City of
PARK & 4 STREET — PHASE TWO
CITY OF BREMERTON FORM OF PROPOSAL
EDA Award No 07 -01 -06590
AFFIDAVIT OF NON- COLLUSION
State of Washington )
ss
County of )
being duly sworn, deposes and says, that he is the identical person who submitted the foregoing proposal
or bid, and that such bid is genuine and not sham or collusive or made in the interest or on behalf of any
person not thereon named, and further, that the deponent has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited
any other bidder on the foregoing work or equipment to put in a sham bid, or any other person or
corporation to refrain from bidding, and that deponent has not, in any manner, sought by collusion to
secure himself, or to any other person, an advantage over any other Bidder or Bidders
Sign Here
(Company Name)
(Signature)
(Title)
(SEAL, IF INCORPORATED)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 20_
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, fesiding at
(This Affidavit properly executed must accompany all proposals)
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
eeee e e eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeoeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeBOe e e eeaeeeeeeeee■
SUBJECT: Mutual Aid Agreement between Study Session Date November 3o, 2011
the City of Bremerton and participating COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
Kitsap County law enforcement agencies Department Police __
Presenter Chief Rogers
Phone 473 -5750
SUMMARY: The purpose of the Agreement is to provide a thorough, professional, high quality
investigation and to ensure the impartiality of the enquiry and /or completeness of an investigation It
is intended to create a team of investigators who can be called upon by any of the member
jurisdictions to investigate mayor incidents of criminal activity or of significant investigative complexity
ATTACHMENTS: Mutual Aid Agreement referred to as Kitsap County Investigative Response
Team, "KCIRT"
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount)* Expenditure is included in the proposed 2012.
budget
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Mutual Aid Agreement for mutual aid response between the participating Kdsap
County law enforcement agencies and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement
with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented
STUDY SESSION ACTION: Cons nt end General Business ❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny able ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
�t�4t�DG� lSL�,� gREM[RrpN
3
L iZ•tK
6 �r
1890 CI i Y,
Team
I of 9
WHEREAS, the Washington Mutual Aid Peace Officers Powers Act is intended to
facilitate mutual aid and cooperative enforcement of the laws among general authority local,
state and federal agencies (RCW 10.93.001(1)); and
WHEREAS, the parties utilizing this Agreement have previously mutually authorized
each other to exercise Police Powers in their respective jurisdictions as evidenced by documents
on file with the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Mutual Aid Agreement (hereafter "Agreement') is to
provide a thorough, professional, high quality investigation and to ensure the impartiality of the
inquiry and /or completeness of an investigation. This Agreement is between the signatory law
enforcement agencies of Washington State. It is intended to create a team of investigators who
can be called upon by any of the member jurisdictions to investigate major incidents of criminal
activity or of significant investigative complexity. This includes incidents of a criminal nature
involving an employee of a participating agency; and
WHEREAS, nothing herein is intended to in any way limit the authority of law
enforcement to act in those circumstances set forth in RCW 10.93.070(1) through (6) as now
enacted or as hereafter amended.
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree to this implementation policy as follows:
1. PARTICIPATING AGENCIES
The participating agencies are the state and local governments which operate the following
departments:
1.1 Bainbridge Island Police Department
1.2 Bremerton Police Department
1.3 Port Orchard Police Department
1.4 Poulsbo Police Department
1.5 Washington State Patrol
2. DEFINITIONS
2.1 " KCIRT" is defined as Kitsap County Investigative Response Team, a team of
investigators who can be called upon by any of the participating agencies to investigate major
incidents of criminal activity or of significant investigative complexity.
2.2 " KCIRT Coordinator" is defined as the individual or law enforcement position
designated by the department head of each participating agency to manage KCIRT requests or
deployments.
2.3 " KCIRT Commander" is defined as the individual or law enforcement position
designated to be in charge of KCIRT investigators.
2 of 9
J
2.4 "Venue Agency" means the agency with primary territorial jurisdiction, as defined
by RCW 10.93.020(7)
2.5 All terms will be interpreted in accordance with the purposes of Chapter 10.93
RCW or defined as provided in RCW 10.93.020.
3. AUTHORITY- IMPLEMENTATION
The decision to implement Mutual Aid under this Agreement rests entirely with the department
head of the Venue Agency. The level of KCIRT participation is also at the discretion of the
Venue Agency. Each incident that involves KCIRT is situational, making the command structure
as it relates to the specific case to be determined on a case -by -case basis. Cases involving an
employee of a Venue Agency may necessitate that the command authority be relinquished to a
designated KCIRT Commander from another agency. The KCIRT will not be used for conducting
Administrative / Internal Investigations (i.e. non - criminal).
4.0 ACTIVATION
4.1 The Chief of Police or the Sheriff of the agency with jurisdiction over the
incident, or their designee shall contact their agency KCIRT Coordinator to request KCIRT
activation.
4.2 The requesting KCIRT Coordinator and agency department head will select a
primary KCIRT agency of choice and request KCIRT activation through that agency's KCIRT
Coordinator.
4.3 The selected KCIRT Coordinator will contact participating agencies to activate
appropriate personnel to respond to the specific incident.
4.4 When activated, the team will respond to the location designated by the agency
of primary jurisdiction. The team members assigned to an investigation shall remain available
from the time of the call out until deactivated.
4.5 Each department should establish their own guidelines as to when and if they
will request assistance from KCIRT. Participating Agencies are under no obligation to request
the assistance of KCIRT nor to respond to a request for assistance.
S. RESPONSIBLITIES OF VENUE AGENCY:
The Venue Agency shall be responsible for the following.
5.1 The Venue Agency shall ensure proper crime scene protection. This includes,
but is not limited to, immediately securing the crime scene, controlling access into the crime
scene, and recording the names of individuals who have entered the crime scene. Written
reports shall be provided by all personnel who enter a designated crime scene.
3 of 9
5.2 The Venue Agency shall identify, and take reasonable steps to protect,
perishable evidence at the scene(s).
5.3 The Venue Agency shall attempt to identify witnesses who are present at the
scene. If appropriate, potential witnesses should be sequestered.
5.4 If, prior to the arrival of KCIRT personnel, a person is transported to a hospital
with life- threatening or fatal injuries, the Venue Agency shall make every effort to provide an
officer to accompany that person in order to:
5.4.1 Locate, preserve, safeguard and maintain the chain of custody for
physical evidence.
5.4.2 Obtain a dying declaration, spontaneous statement, and /or statement
of then - existing, or previous, mental or physical state.
5.4.3 Maintain custody of the person if he /she has been arrested.
5.4.4 Provide information to medical personnel about the incident that is
relevant to treatment, and obtain information from medical personnel relevant to the criminal
investigation.
5.4.5 Identify relevant people, including witnesses and medical personnel.
5.5 The Venue Agency shall make every effort to provide necessary department
personnel available to the KCIRT.
5.6 The Venue Agency shall allow use of space and equipment as needed by the
KCIRT.
5.7 If a law enforcement officer has been injured and transported to a hospital, the
agency in whose Jurisdiction the hospital is located shall provide appropriate security and
assistance. The Venue Agency shall be responsible for providing necessary assistance to the
officer's family at the hospital.
5.8 Upon Venue Agency approval the Venue Agency shall be responsible for all
reasonable investigative expenditures.
5.9 The Venue Agency shall be responsible for handling and storage of all evidence.
Costs associated with extraordinary evidence items e.g. vehicles, vessels, etc. shall be borne by
the Venue Agency.
5.10 The Venue Agency requesting the KCIRT will assist the KCIRT Commander with
any requests for special support such as equipment, food, water, shelter, and transportation
This assistance is especially needed in isolated, rural areas. Such assistance will be provided by
the Venue Agency within its abilities and available resources.
4 of 9
6. RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTICIPATING AGENCY
6.1 Each participating agency shall pay all wages and benefits due any of its
employees providing services under this Agreement, including overtime pay, worker's
compensation benefits and death benefits, in the same manner as when those employees are
on duty working directly for their employing agency.
6.2 Each participating agency shall remain responsible for the ordinary wear and tear
and routine maintenance of its respective equipment, used in support of this Agreement,
whether or not the equipment is used under the direct supervision and control of such agency.
6.3 Expenses incurred in the nature of travel, meals, and lodging and other expenses
not otherwise specifically mentioned here shall be paid by one or more of the participating
agencies in a manner determined on a case -by -case basis. Normally, the expenditure of funds
by one agency to assist another agency is roughly balanced over the long term by reciprocal
expenditures incurred when the other agency assists the first agency. In any situation where
expenses are to be reimbursed to an assisting agency, the Venue Agency must preauthorize
such expenditure.
7. DAMAGED EQUIPMENT
Each participating agency will be responsible for repairing or replacing its equipment that may
be damaged during an investigation. If the cost is substantial, the agency whose equipment
was damaged may request to share the expense with other members but no participating
agency is obligated to contribute.
8. MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
Each participating agency agrees to supply its own personnel with the necessary supplies to
participate in the KCIRT (notebooks, cameras, tapes, electronic media, pens, etc.). Each
participating agency is responsible to re- supply its own personnel for expended supplies.
Unusually large expenditures may need to be discussed among participating agencies to
determine if any reimbursement or shared cost is possible.
9. EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSES
Extraordinary costs or expenses incurred in an investigation where this Agreement has been
utilized, e.g. travel, meals, lodging or other expenses not foreseen, shall be paid in accordance
with agreements established by agency heads of participating agencies on a case by case basis.
5 of 9
10. MEDIA RELATIONS
The Venue Agency will be responsible for media contacts and relations. The KCIRT will keep
the Venue Agency's Public Information Officer (PIO) apprised of releasable information regularly
for dissemination. At its discretion, the Venue Agency may defer media contact to the KCIRT.
However, all releases will be pre- approved by the Venue Agency. For KCIRT responses
involving Venue Agency personnel as subjects of the investigation, the Venue Agency should
make use of a PIO with training equivalent to FEMA, FBI Academy, or other equivalent training
standards.
11. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
The Venue Agency will be responsible for public disclosure requests associated with a KCIRT
investigation. When a KCIRT investigation is open and active all records associated with the
investigation are exempt from disclosure. Any time a Participating Agency receives a Public
Disclosure Request (PDR) while a KCIRT investigation is open and active the Participating
Agency, in recognition of the need for effective law enforcement, should notify the requestor
that the KCIRT file is exempt from disclosure. See RCW 42.56.240(1) and Newman v. King
County, 133 Wash.2d 565, 947 P.2d 712 (1997). All PDRs should be handled in consultation
with the Kitsap County Prosecutor's Office.
12. DURATION OF UNDERSTANDING
This Agreement shall take effect when it has been signed by the authorized representative of
each participating agency, and shall be renewed automatically on the annual anniversary of the
date of signing even if the signers to this Agreement no longer hold the office they represented
as signer, subject to termination as set forth herein.
13. TERMINATION, SUSPENSION OR WITHDRAWAL FROM AGREEMENT
13.1 Any party to this Agreement may withdraw from the Agreement. However, prior
to the withdrawal being effective, the withdrawing party must give a minimum of ten (10) days
written notice to the other participating agencies. Regardless of withdrawal, the terms of this
Agreement shall apply in any situation where one signing agency is then receiving mutual aid
from any other participating agency or agencies. No withdrawal of a single signer or multiple
signers will terminate the Agreement unless no more members remain signatories to the
Agreement.
13.2 In any event, regardless of the existence of this Agreement, withdrawal from this
Agreement or signing of this Agreement, all law enforcement agencies will still have full
authority to act pursuant to RCW 10.93.070, Washington Mutual Aid Peace Officers Powers Act.
6of9
14. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY
This Agreement shall be construed as additional authority and not as limiting any preexisting
authority of the parties with respect to mutual aid.
1S. WAIVER
The failure of any party to enforce a provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver by
it of that or any other provision.
16. PARTIAL INVALIDITY
16.1 It is the intent of the parties that if any part, term, or provision of this
Agreement should be adjudged invalid, the remaining portions of the Agreement shall continue
in full force and effect.
16.2 Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such
a way as to be effective and valid under applicable law and consistent with the current
Intergovernmental Agreement for Mutual Aid Amongst Law Enforcement Agencies in Kitsap
County, Washington.
17. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may only be amended in writing, acknowledged by the authorized signature of
all parties.
18. LIABILITY
RCW 10.93.040 and 10.93.060 and any other applicable provisions of Chapter 10.93 govern
liability and privileges and immunities available to the parties under this Agreement. Nothing
contained in this Agreement shall be construed to create a liability or a right of indemnification
by any third parry
19. SIGNATORIES' AUTHORITY
19.1 The below - signed authorized representatives are signing this Agreement
pursuant to RCW 10.93.070 and pursuant to the existing previously mutually authorized Police
Powers in their respective jurisdictions as evidenced by documents on file with the Washington
Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs. The authorization given by any participating agency
shall be effective on the date of signature of that entity.
7 of 9
19.2 In accordance with RCW 10.93.130 and the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter
39.34 RCW, this Agreement has been approved by the City Council, legislative board or head of
each jurisdiction or participating agency. The following provisions are adopted as required by
RCW 39.34.
19.2.1 As provided herein, each party shall jointly finance its operations unless a
specific agreement is reached and approved regarding a specific investigation. All such specific
addenda may be approved by the Police Chiefs of the affected parties in a prior written
agreement as provided herein.
19.2.2 The duration of this Agreement shall be indefinite and continue until
terminated by all the parties hereto.
19.2.3 No additional or organizational structure beyond that provided in Section
2.2 of this Agreement is created.
19.2.4 Any point or cooperative understating shall be financed as provided
herein. Unless a specific agreement to reimburse or pay expenses is adopted as provided
herein, each party shall be responsible to individually budget sufficient amounts to fulfill its
obligations under this Agreement.
19.2.5 This Agreement may be terminated as provided in Section 13 hereof.
19.2.6 This Agreement shall be effective when posted on the website of any
participating agency.
10. GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties by the signatures of their authorized representatives have
executed this Agreement effective on the date shown by each signature.
City of Port Orchard Police Department City of Bremerton Police Department
By: By:
Lary Coppola Craig Rogers
Mayor Chief of Police
Date: Date:
8 of 9
City of Bainbridge Island Police Department City of Poulsbo Police Department
By: By:
Brenda Bauer Becky Erickson
City Manager Mayor
Approved by: Date:
By:
Jon Fehlman
Chief of Police
Date:
Washington State Patrol
By:
Robert N. Johnson
Captain
Bremerton District Commander
Date:
9 of 9
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL V5 r4
SUBJECT: Resolution No 3L5Z to Study Session Date November 30, 2011
Establish January 18, 2012 as a Hearing COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
Date to vacate Broadway Avenue from 13 Department PW &U
to 16 Streets Presenter Gunnar Fndnksson
Phone 473 -2354
SUMMARY: Olympic College has initiated the vacation of Broadway Avenue from 13 Street to 16
Street The City requested a traffic analysis from the College to evaluate the area, and to determine
what improvement needed to be made to Broadway Avenue to reduce non - college vehicles using the
area This study was performed by Parametnx, Inc in April 2010 The suggested improvement is to
vacate Broadway Avenue and construct a new signal at 13 and Warren for access to Warren
Avenue
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No 315 Exhibit Drawing, and Staff Report
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount)
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Resolution No 3t5 to Establish January 18, 2012 as a
Hearing Date to vacate Broadway Avenue between 13 and 16 Streets
STUDY SESSION ACTION: Con ent A trida ❑ General Business ❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑Approve ❑ Deny Table ❑Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 11/02/2011
RESOLUTION NO. 315
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, establishing a hearing date for the
proposed vacation of Broadway Avenue from 13 Street to 16'
Street
WHEREAS, Olympic College has initiated the vacation to add a new traffic
signal at 13` Street and Warren Avenue to allow the existing roadway to become internal to the
campus
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. A public hearing will be held on January 18, 2012 at 5 30 p m or
later in the City Council Chambers at the Norm Dicks Government Center, First Floor, 345 Sixth
Street, Bremerton, Washington, to take public comment or consider written objections to the
vacation.
SECTION2. Severabdzot If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and
effect
SECTION 3. Effective Date This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this day
of , 2011
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST
ROGER A LUBOVICH, City Attorney SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk
1
Broadway Avenue Vacation —Resolution
16t St.
4 a„
AFN 8012180088 8 Y 1
-
7 �o
�� - 2
s _f 3
9 I I 5 a I
TRACT 6
Ili �
10 UNKNOWN
mm"" I ' m 8012050082 I
15th St. & M20OW
6
WARREN SKIM ACRE I
TRACTS DEDICATION I
I s
I
Claaa 1 Area 87.923 e f I
I
7 Class 0 Areas 6.085 a i
I Claw III Nees 15,728 al
I
m
I I .
a I,
8 c Q
TRACT 7 x ORDNANCE 381,1811 3
I�
m I
9 I
I 2 I
I
I I
I
10 I
AFN 8012180088 1
I
EXHIBIT
_ Portions of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4
13th i Section 14, T 24 N, R 1 E, W M
City of Bremerton, Kitsap County, Washington
STREET VACATION REQUEST
BROADWAY AVENUE FROM 13 TO 16 STREET
ENGINEERING STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: January 18, 2012
PREPARED BY: Gunnar Fndriksson
SUMMARY
Applicant Olympic College
c/o David C Mitchell
1600 Chester Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98337
Location Broadway Avenue from 13 to 16 Street, lying in the Plat of Warren
Smith's Acre Tracts as recorded in Volume 2, of the book of plats, Page
51, records of Kitsap County, Washington
BACKGROUND
The current master plan for the College has identified 13 Street as the south boundary,
Ohio Avenue as the west, Warren Avenue as the primary east boundary and Port
Washington Narrows on the north This plan was completed in September of 2008 In
discussions with the City for new replacement parking lots between Broadway and
Warren Avenues, and 13 and 15" Streets, the City requested a traffic analysis from
the College to evaluate the area, and in particular what improvements needed to be
made to Broadway to reduce non - college vehicles using the area
The study was completed by Parametrix, Inc, in April of 2010 and found the best
alternative would be to vacate Broadway with a new signal at 13 and Warren
constructed for access to Warren Avenue This would allow the existing roadway to
become internal to the campus, promoting connectivity and safety for the students The
new signal would be coordinated with others in the corridor and would not deteriorate
the current level of service on Warren Avenue
The City of Bremerton created this portion of Broadway Avenue in March of 1911 with
Ordinance 382 The alignment of the street was previously vacated in 1962 between
15 and 16 Streets for building construction The roadway in this section was moved
easterly to its current position sometime after the vacation, but the right of way was not
dedicated until 1980
Broadway between 13 and 15 was purchased by the City from the individual property
owners under threat of condemnation in the 1910's and is Class I right of way The
portion of Broadway between 15 and 16 was deeded to the City by the State of
Washington in 1980 at no cost to the City, and improvements paid for by the College
November 2011
Broadway Vacation — 13 to 16 Street
Page 1 of 5
Staff supports having this section treated as Class III right of way The plat dedicated
15 Street and as such, this is Class II right of way
RIGHT OF WAY CONDITIONS
• Functional Classification Local Access
• Existing R -O -W Width Varies — mostly 50 feet
• Proposed R -O -W Width N/A
• Pavement Width 22 foot
• Surface Type Asphalt and concrete
• Curb and Gutter Yes
• Sidewalks Yes
HEARING CONSIDERATIONS
BMC 1120120 sets forth issues that the City Council needs to determine at the
conclusion of the Vacation Hearing These issues and the staff position are
1. Whether the street, alley or portion thereof is no longer required for public
use and vacation of the described portion will better serve the public good.
Staff Position
With construction of a new signal at 13 and Warren, traffic will be able to access
Warren Avenue and the current roadway revert to usage by the campus
2. Whether the vacation is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Position
The proposed vacation does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan
3. Whether continued use of the proposed vacation as a public way is not of
such public benefit as to justify the costs of maintenance.
Staff Position
The improvements will reduce the City's maintenance responsibility in this area
as the existing roadway, sidewalks, curb and gutter would become the
responsibility of the college
4. Whether substitution of a new and different thoroughfare would be more
useful to the public.
Staff Position
Circulation through this area will use 13 Street and the new signal at Warren
Avenue to access the SR 303 corridor
5. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater
public use or need than presently exists.
November 2011
Broadway Vacation —13 to 16 Street
Page 2 of 5
Staff Position
No — property will remain vested with the College and be incorporated into the
campus per the master plan
6. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of
private property abutting the same.
Staff Position
No objections have been received by staff There is one remaining residential
property along the roadway and Olympic College is retaining an easement for
them for access
SHORELINE ACCESS
This portion of right -of -way does not provide shoreline access
UTILITIES
All private utility companies were contacted Comcast and PSE will retain an easement
for servicing the remaining residence The City of Bremerton will also retain an
easement for water and sanitary sewer mains Catch basins and the storm system shall
become the responsibility of the College Easements may be released upon
arrangements made for utility relocations
SUFFICIENCY OF SIGNATURES
Olympic college owns all adjacent properties with the exception of the one residence
COMPENSATION
This vacation a mixture of Class I, Class II and Class III right -of -way No compensation
is owing for Class III right of way Total compensation using 2011 Kitsap County value
assessments from the adjacent parcels will be
Class I Right of Way 37,323 sq ft x $16 /sq ft = $597,168
Class II Right of Way 5,065 sq ft x (0 5) x $16 /sq ft =$40,520
Sub -Total $637,688
Monies owed for the vacation will be reduced by the dedication of right of way at 17
and Warren Avenue, construction of the signal, and right of way dedicated by the
College for 13 Street and Warren Avenue in conjunction with the new parking lot
These amounts are
17 and Warren Avenue ROW 2,022 sq ft x$16 /sq ft = $32,352
Signal construction (estimated) = $350,000
13 and Warren Avenue ROW credit(remamder from Ord #5149) =$229,630
Sub -Total ($)
GRAND TOTAL $25,706
November 2011
Broadway Vacation —13 to 16 Street
Page 3 of 5
No compensation will be required by the City to the College The College has
requested any remaining costs owed be forgiven in accordance with BMC 1120 140(E)
Resolution of compensation will be at completion of the signal installation construction
This will be when all construction costs are actual and known
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
City Attorney, Police, Fire, Engineering and Community Development staff notes no
objections to the proposal
Staff recommends that this Street Vacation be approved as requested
A
i
4
_ t
20
Looking northerly from 13"' Street up Broadway Avenue
November 2011
Broadway Vacation —13 to 16 Street
Page 4 of 5
r
r
r
j
Looking northerly on Broadway at stree dog - 15 Street
r
I
Looking northerly from 15 Street up to 16 th Street on Broadway
November 2011
Broadway Vacation -13 to 16 Street
Page 5 of 5
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 5C)
SUBJECT: Move forward with Interlocal Study Session Date November 30, 2011
Agreement with King County for Regional COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
Aerial Mapping Department PW &U
Presenter Gunnar Fridriksson
Phone 473 -2354
SUMMARY: The City of Bremerton and a consortium of governmental and local entities wish to
cooperate on a Regional Aerial Mapping Project, to be flown in early 2012 Management of the
project will be by King County The City will receive electronically updated aerial mapping for the
entire City limits and service areas with a 6 inch resolution that will update and supercede current
imaging from 2005
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement and Council Summary
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) Total cost for project is estimated at $5,000
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Approve the In rlocal Agreement and authorize the Mayor to finalize
and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented in an
amount not to exceed the Mayor's contract authorization amount (BMC 2 76 100)
STUDY SESSION ACTION: t Co sent A end ❑General Business El Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 11/02/2011
COUNCIL SUMMARY
Aerial Mapping Interlocal Agreement
Summary
The City of Bremerton has been approached by a consortium of governmental and local
entities who wish to cooperate on a Regional Aerial Mapping Project (Project) The
consortium will have the project area flown in early 2012 and the City will receive
electronically updated aerial mapping for the entire City limits and service areas with a 6-
inch resolution. These maps will be high - accuracy, high - quality orthounagery in
standard format and tiling as defined by the composite Area of Interest (AOI) for the
City (See attached)
Management of the project will be by King County who will advertise an invitation to bid
for the project and accept the lowest priced bid that fully meets all requirements in the
Statement of Work (SOW) for the project A project manager from King County will be
appointed to oversee day -to -day operations of the contract and report to the Project
Steering Committee (PSC). The City of Bremerton will have voting representation on the
PSC, as will all signatories to the agreement.
This aerial mapping will update and supercede current imaging from 2005 which is
currently being used for City projects and exhibits Staff recommends this mapping be
updated for this use.
Fiscal Summary
Total cost for the City of Bremerton is approximately $5000 This represents a direct
payment of $3900 to King County for the contract contingency fee and City staff costs to
support the project. However, this cost is not finalized and may move upwards
depending on participation Staff requests approval for the Interlocal Agreement and
Council to authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially
the same terms and conditions as presented in an amount not to exceed the Mayor's
contract authorization amount per BMC 2 76 100 There is no cost to the participants for
King County staff to manage the project.
2012 Regional Aerial Mapping
Council Summary
1
2012 Regional Aerial Mapping Funding Agreement
This Funding Agreement (Agreement) is entered into by and among. the City of
Algona, the City of Auburn, the City of Bainbridge Island, the Bainbridge Island Fire
Department, the Bainbridge Island Land Trust, the Bainbridge Island Metro Park and
Recreation District, the City of Bellevue, the City of Bothell, the City of Bremerton, the
City of Burien, the City of Clyde Hill, the City of Des Moines, the City of Enumclaw, the
City of Federal Way, the City of Issaquah, the King County Water District 125, the City
of Kenmore, the County of King, the City of Kirkland, the County of Kitsap, the Kitsap
Public Utility District, the Lakehaven Utility District, the City of Maple Valley, the City
of Mercer Island, the Midway Sewer District, the Muckleshoot Tribe, the City of
Normandy Park, the North Kitsap Fire and Rescue, the City of Pacific, the City of
Poulsbo, the City of Redmond, the City of Sammamish, the City of Seattle, the City of
Shoreline, the S'Klallam Tribe, the City of Snoqualmie, the Suquamish Tribe, the City of
Tukwila, the Tulalip Tribe, the United States Geological Survey, the Valley View Sewer
District, the West Sound Utility District, the City of Woodinville, the City of Yarrow
Point, and other counties, cities and governmental service agencies that later ,loin
(hereinafter "Party" or Parties ")
I. INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement, authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act
(RCW 39.34), is to permit a consortium of governmental units and local entities to
cooperate on the funding of a 2012 Regional Aerial Mapping Project (Project) The
Protect will use vendor services for the production of orthoimagery and related aerial
mapping The Project includes a structure for funding, governance, technical and
administrative management, and quality control/quality assurance (QC /QA) of
deliverables from the selected vendor (Vendor) Joint funding of the Project will optimize
purchasing capabilities and mapping resources, and ensure a standardized product for all
participants
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
All Project details, technical specifications, and deliverable descriptions will
appear in the Statement of Work (SOW) to be developed for inclusion in the Invitation to
Bid (ITB). Bid submittals will be reviewed, including reference checks Any bid failing
to meet all requirements of the SOW will be rejected. All other bids will be considered
accepted and will be ranked based on price The lowest priced, accepted bid that fully
meets all requirements of the SOW will constitute the contract between King County (as
representative of the signatories of this Agreement), and the Vendor. The primary Project
goal (Standard Deliverable) is 3 -inch, 6 -inch, and 12 -mch resolution orthoimagery, both
natural color and near infrared, as well as stereo models, and supporting data. Project
costs are shared where Areas of Interest (AOIs) overlap, in turn reducing each Party's
Regionalimagery2012 _Fundmg_20111028
2
financial commitment. A secondary Project goal (Supplemental Deliverables) is ancillary
datasets such as transportation impervious, structure rooflmes, other impervious surfaces,
and detailed contours derived from the Standard Deliverable These costs will be paid
solely by those Parties providing an AOI for these products, discounted for any savings
from overlap among the AOIs
II. PROJECT MANAGER
1 King County shall appoint a King County Project Manager (PM) to
manage the Vendor contract on a day -to -day basis The PM shall report to
and make recommendations to the Project Steering Committee (PSC) on
the matters described in Section III.2 below, and shall be readily
accessible via phone and e-mail by all Parties The PM shall remain an
employee of King County at all times, and King County shall retain the
right and duty to supervise the PM at all times. King County will assume
all personnel costs associated with protect management for the Project
2 The duties of the PM shall include -
a. Form subcommittees and workgroups as needed by the Project,
and as directed by the PSC, including a Technical Workgroup
(TWG).
b In consultation with the TWG, work with, as necessary and as
available, supplemental personnel resources as described in
Section V.
C Prepare a cost - allocation model for review and acceptance by PSC
Upon acceptance, populate the model with required data to provide
each Party with accurate cost estimates, and a final cost once a bid
has been accepted.
d Coordinate with King County Procurement to incorporate the
SOW into an ITB; advertise the ITB, address any bid addendums;
and evaluate, rank, and summarize bid submittals for review by the
TWG and the PSC.
e. Prepare written justification for all bids that are rejected
f Manage the Vendor contract on a day -to -day basis and provide
direction and guidance to the Vendor as requested by PSC
g Report to the PSC and TWG frequently on the Vendor's progress.
h Account for delivery of all Standard and Supplemental
Deliverables, including a defined, but limited, quality check, and
coordinate the more detailed QC /QA reviews to be performed by
the TWG
1. Submit Vendor change order requests to the TWG and the PSC for
evaluation and determination of response
J Submit Vendor invoices to the PSC and direct payment of such
invoices by the Fiscal Agent upon approval of the invoice by the
PSC
Regional Imagery20 12_Fundmg_20111028
3
3 The PM will provide staff support for and participate in PSC meetings, but
shall not be a voting member of the PSC
III. PROJECT STEERING CONMTTEE
1 A Project Steering Committee (PSC) shall be formed and shall consist of
one voting representative from each Party that is a signatory to this
Agreement. The TWG will provide one voting representative to the PSC.
The PM, as a non -voting member of the PSC, will provide coordination
among the PSC, the TWG, and the Vendor The King County GIS
Manager, as the King County representative, will serve as the Chair of the
PSC
2 The PSC shall direct the PM on all substantive decisions concerning the work
and shall review and take final action on the following specific items -
a Approve the Project methodology and calculations for cost allocation
developed by the PM
b. Approve the SOW jointly developed by the TWG and the PM prior to
Issuance of the ITB The SOW will include a schedule for completion
of the entire Protect
c Review and approve point recommendations by PM and TWG on the
lowest -cost bid submittal that meets all requirements of the SOW
King County shall have sole decision making authority to act upon the
recommendation of the PSC .
d Determine a contingency percentage to be applied to the cost
allocation model in addition to the Vendor contract price as set forth in
Section VII 2.
e. Receive reports from the PM for management of the Vendor contract
and deliverables
f. Approve the Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QC /QA) Plan
developed jointly by the PM and TWG Review and approve QC /QA
results developed and submitted jointly by the PM and TWG,
including rejected deliverables and timeline for redelivery
g Evaluate and provide direction to the PM regarding change order
requests whether initiated by the Vendor or by a member or members
of the PSC.
h Authorize Vendor payments as submitted by the PM
i Develop administrative policies necessary for proper functioning of
the PSC, and provide direction for the TWG and other ad hoc groups
as may be necessary.
3 Each representative of the PSC may appoint an alternate representative who
shall be empowered to act on behalf of the primary representative
Regional lmagery20 12_Fundmg_20111028
4
4 The PSC will strive for consensus in making decisions.
5 Meetings of the PSC shall be held on an as- needed basis. Meetings may be
scheduled at the request of the Chair of the PSC, the PM and/or TWG, or by a
majority of the PSC members The Chair shall be responsible for the logistics
of scheduling PSC meetings Attendance may be in person or via
teleconferencing When required, voting by email will be acceptable.
IV. TECBMCAL WORKING GROUP
1 The responsibilities of the TWG shall include-
a. Create a SOW for the Project and submit the SOW to the PSC for its
approval
b Perform necessary QC /QA for Project deliverables and report results
to the PM for communication to the Vendor
c. Review bids ranked by the PM and provide a recommendation to the
PSC on preferred bid(s), if any
d. Execute any other tasks as may be required by the PSC.
2 The TWG will provide one voting representative to the PSC
3 The TWG shall consist of one voting representative from each Party that is a
signatory to this Agreement A Party's PSC representative may also represent
the Party on the TWG.
4. The TWG will strive for consensus in making decisions.
5. Meetings of the TWG shall be held on an as- needed basis. Meetings may be
scheduled at the request of the PSC, the PM, or by a majority of the TWG
members. The PM shall be responsible for the logistics of scheduling TWG
meetings Attendance may be in person or via teleconferencing When
required, voting by email will be acceptable
V. SUPPLEMENTAL RESOURCES
1 The PM, in consultation with the TWG, may work with, as necessary and as
available, supplemental resources with demonstrated technical expertise
related to the project Contemplated supplemental resources include both: (i)
a registered photogrammetrist (or equivalent expertise), and (ii) supplemental
protect management with proven production and regional protect experience
2 Supplemental resources, when provided, will be beneficial to the project
participants, though all protect costs associated with (i) shall be borne by King
County, and all project costs for (ii) shall be borne by the Party providing the
support
VI. FISCAL AGENT
1. King County, acting as fiscal agent for the Project, shall•
Regional lmagery2012_Fundmg- 20111028
5
a Enter into a Vendor contract
b Validate the cost for each Party.
C. Invoke each Party in accordance with this Agreement.
d Maintain the Project funds in the King County Imagery Reserve, a
separate, non - interest - bearing fund managed by King County GIS
Fund 5481, to be disbursed as provided in this Agreement.
e Pay Vendor invoices approved by the PSC
f Refund excess funds, if necessary
2 King County shall perform and maintain an accounting of payments
received from all Parties including- billings received from the Vendor,
payments made to the Vendor, and unspent funds. King County shall
provide a statement of this accounting to all Parties in email or writing
quarterly or upon written (including e-mail) request.
3 Upon receipt of a notice of any record keeping dispute, King County shall
notify all of the Parties and meet jointly with all interested PSC members
within two (2) weeks to resolve any record keeping dispute.
VII. CONTRIBUTIONS BY PARTIES
1 By executing Counterparts, Section XIX of this Agreement, each Party
agrees to pay its required monetary contribution, as stated on the signature
page, for all Standard and Supplemental Deliverables for their AOI.
2. The actual contribution for each Party (exclusive of grant funds) shall be
calculated once the Vendor contract price is set, using the cost allocation
model set forth below, which will include a contingency percentage to be
determined by the PSC. Cost allocation model for Standard Deliverables
(imagery and supporting data). Each Party's funding commitment will be
factored as the cost per full 3000 -ft x 3000 -ft the (Tile) that intersects their
AOI, discounting for significant areas of water For Tiles where AOIs
overlap, the cost will be prorated equally among the affected Parties Cost
allocation model for Supplemental Deliverables Each Party's
commitment will be factored as the deliverable unit cost times the area of
the Party's AOI for that deliverable Where AOIs overlap for the same
deliverable, the cost will be prorated equally among the affected Parties. It
will be the sole responsibility of the affected Party to define all SOW
requirements for any deliverables and to pay the full cost, if not prorated
with another Party
3 By signing this Agreement, each Party commits to paying its full
contribution to the King County Imagery Reserve Fund by 4 p m, January
31, 2012 Any qualifications to this commitment will be stated in
Regional Imagery2012_Fundmg_20111028
6
Counterparts, Section XIX, for that Party An invoice will be generated for
each Party
4 All payments to the King County Imagery Reserve Fund shall be made by
check payable to King County Finance, and sent to King County GIS, 201
S Jackson St, Suite 706, Seattle, WA 98104, Attn: Katy Cressey.
5. By signing this Agreement each Party is committing to license the primary
Standard Deliverable (orthoimagery and supporting data) for their AOI
resulting from this Project. Default licensing terms will apply unless
Party - specific licensing terms are included in the SOW. Each Party
requiring licensing language different than the default will provide such
language for inclusion in the SOW. In contrast, Supplemental Deliverables
will be purchased (owned outright) by each Party committing to this
Agreement.
6. Except for a contingency amount, as determined by the PSC, King County
shall not collect funds in excess of the Vendor contract price unless the
contract price has been amended with a PSC- approved change order. All
funds collected by King County shall be used solely to pay the Vendor for
work completed under the Vendor contract King County shall not collect,
receive or retain any of these funds for project management,
administrative fees, or other actions it performs under this Agreement.
Should there be an excess of funds, King County will refund any excess if
greater than $10, and if the affected Party specifically requests the refund
Any excess not refunded shall remain in the Imagery Reserve Fund for use
in subsequent regional imagery acquisitions, until this Agreement (or as
amended) expires, at which time all remaining funds will be refunded to
the affected Parties
7 If a Party's contribution is made up in whole or in part of grant funds, the
Party agrees to provide King County with a copy of the contract between
itself and the grant funding agency in order to assist King County and the
PSC in complying with the requirements of any such grant The grant
contract shall be provided as soon as possible after committing to this
Agreement, and no later than when the Party deposits its funds with King
County
8 In addition to the fiscal commitment for funding the Standard Deliverables
and optional Supplemental Deliverables, Parties may, but are not required
to, contribute as follows
a Participate as a member or alternate to the PSC
b. Participate as a member of the TWG or other committee. This may
include assisting in establishing ground control, developing
specifications for Supplemental Deliverables required by the Party,
Regional hnagery2012_Fundmg- 20111028
and developing QC /QA procedures for Standard and Supplemental
Deliverables required by the Party
c. Perform all detailed QC /QA of Standard and Supplemental
Deliverables (if any) for their AOI using a TWG- defined plan and
schedule (The PM will perform limited, baseline assessment of the
Standard Deliverables only)
VIII. ADDITION OF PARTIES
1 An entity may be added to this Agreement as long as the entity signs this
Agreement by 4 p m. December 2, 2011, or by 4 p.m on the fourteenth (14th)
day after the PSC selects a winning bidder, if after December 2 2011
2. A Party added to this Agreement shall make full payment to the King County
Imagery Reserve Fund by 4 p.m January 31, 2012. A Party may contribute its
share from its budget for either FY 2011 or FY 2012
3 Any entity who wishes to participate in the Agreement after the date
established in VIII.1 may become a Party by contributing the required funds
to the King County Image Reserve Fund. This contribution will be the full
cost (not prorated if shared by other Parties) of a Tile, if a Standard
Deliverable, or the applied unit cost, if a Supplemental Deliverable Any funds
due to a Party, whose cost would have otherwise been prorated due to the
additional Party, will be managed per Section VII.6
IX. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The services provided by King County under this Agreement are those of an
independent contractor. Employees of King County are and will remain employees of
King County Employees of the other Parties are and will remain employees of their
respective Parties. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to render the Parties
partners or joint venturers
X. INDEMNIFICATION
Each Party shall defend, protect and hold harmless the other Parties from and
against all claims, suits and/or other actions arising from any negligent or intentional act
or omission of that Party's employees, agents and/or authorized subcontractor(s) while
performing this Agreement
XI. AMENDMENT
The Parties may amend this Agreement. Such amendments shall not be binding
unless in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the Parties.
XII. CHOICE OF LAW AND VENUE
Regional Imagery2012_Fundmg_20111028
8
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as
to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or other judicial
proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement shall be instituted only in a court of
competent, jurisdiction in King County
XHL INTEGRATION CLAUSE
This instrument embodies the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to
funding of the Vendor contract. There are no promises, terms, conditions or obligations
other than those contained in this Agreement This Agreement supersedes all previous
communications, representations or agreements, either oral or written, between any Party
and King County
XIV. TERMINATION CLAUSE
In the event that King County decides not to hire a Vendor, this Agreement will
terminate and all Parties will receive a full refund of their contributed funds.
XV. NO ASSIGNMENT
The Parties shall not subcontract, assign, or delegate any of their rights, duties or
obligations under this Agreement without the express prior written approval of King
County.
XVI. DISPUTES
In the event that a dispute arises under this Agreement, the Parties shall endeavor
to resolve the dispute in an amicable manner by direct discussions. The Parties may
elevate the dispute to the PSC. The Parties may engage in alternative dispute resolution
by mutual agreement No party waives its rights to seek legal remedy in the ,jurisdiction
and venue stated in Section XII
XVII. NOTICES
All notices and other communications shall be given to the PM and all notices and
other communications to the other Parties shall be given to the PSC member for each
Party. Notices shall be given in writing and shall be sufficiently given and shall be
deemed given three (3) calendar days after the date by which the same has been (a)
mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the mailing address
shown adjacent to the signatures of the Party to whom it is addressed or (b) sent by email,
with adequate proof of receipt retained by the sender, to the email address shown
adjacent to the signatures of the Party to whom it is addressed. Any of the Parties may,
by notice to all other Parties, designate any further or different addresses to which
subsequent notices or other communications shall be sent.
XVIII. EFFECTIVE DATE; TERM
Regionallmagery20l 2_Fundmg_20111028
9
Notwithstanding when this Agreement is signed, this Agreement shall take effect
following its execution by each Party and shall expire at the end of 2014 unless
terminated sooner This Agreement may be amended to allow it to be used for subsequent
coordinated data collection efforts, including, but not limited to, future orthoimagery
acquisitions
Regional Imagery2012_Fundmg_20 l 11028
10
XIX. COUNTERPARTS
Comment Each Party will be provided with its unique COUNTERPARTS page Besides
the signature block this page will contain
a. A breakdown of costs for each group of deliverables • Image, DTM,
Vector
b. Specific terms of payment for those Parties with requirements for
meeting their financial contribution in a different manner than
stated in the main body of the Agreement For example (as
requested by Issaquah)
This Agreement may be signed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an
original, but all of which together shall constitute the same instrument
The Funding Commitment information from each Party will be summarized in a report
distributed to all members of the PSC.
Name of Party 1 Funding 2. Funding Funding
Commitment Commitment: Commitment
Standard Supplemental TOTAL
Deliverable Deliverables
(imagery)
< Enter name of Party> $ .## I $ ####.## 1$1+2
Terms of payment for City of Issaquah (Issaquah)
1. In lieu of payment into the King County Imagery Reserve Fund as outlined in
Section VII 3 of this agreement, Issaquah agrees to pay <enter Funding
Commitment: TOTAL> towards the project flight costs as its full contribution for
the Standard and Supplemental Deliverables requested by Issaquah. King County
shall generate an invoice for Issaquah's contribution no later than June 1, 2012
The invoice description shall state that the required payment is Issaquah's full
contribution towards the overall protect cost, including all Standard and
Supplemental Deliverables for Issaquah, with all other project costs to be paid by
other Parties
2 If the aerial flight does not occur by the end of the flight window date stated in the
project Statement of Work, Issaquah reserves the right to cancel this Agreement
due to non - availability of funding after June 30, 2012. A commitment by
Issaquah to participate in a potential deferred project in 2013 would be made by
December 15, 2012
Approved as to Form Only:
Party By
Regional lmagery2012_Fundmg_20111028
11
Name Name
Title Title
Address Address
Date Date
Project Steering Committee Representative:
Name
E -Mail
Phone
Regional Imagery2012_Fundmg_20111028
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 6A
seaaeeeeeeaeeeeaaeeeeeeaaaeeeeeeeaaeaaeeeeeseeeeeeeeaeeseaseeeee ■aeaeeeeeeeeeeeaaeaeeaa
SUBJECT: Ordinance N o -5 171 creating Study Session Date 11/30/2011
Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 11 18 COUNCIL MEETING Date 12/7/2011
relating to addressing Department Public Works & Utilities
Presenter Ned Lever
Phone 473 -2398
SUMMARY: The current City addressing ordinance dates back to 1928 and does little more than
establish a City addressing grid and provide guidelines for how address numbers should be
assigned The current ordinance has no provisions for naming streets, modifying incorrect
addresses, or identifying an enforcement procedure to ensure addresses can be changed when
necessary The proposed BMC Chapter 11 18 will establish guidelines for the naming of streets and
assignment and modification of address numbers
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Addressing Ordinance 0v. 5 17
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) None
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve Ordinance No Sl 7 I creating Chapter 11 18 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
entitled "Addressing"
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ C n nt A nda KGeneral Business ❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 11/02/2011
COUNCIL SUMMARY
Summary
Kitsap County and CenCom are conducting a re- addressing project throughout Kitsap
County in an effort to eliminate addressing irregularities and improve emergency vehicle
response times The current City addressing ordinance dates back to 1928 and does
little more than establish a City addressing grid and provide guidelines for how address
numbers should be assigned Currently, there are no provisions in the BMC that
regulate addressing, nor any ordinances which authorize the City to change an address
if necessary
The current ordinance has no provisions for naming streets, modifying incorrect
addresses, or identifying an enforcement procedure to ensure addresses can be
changed when necessary
The proposed BMC Chapter 11 18 will accomplish the following,
• Define the powers and duties of the department related to addressing
• Create an integrated map that defines the area of county versus the area of city
grid numbering
• Establish clear guidelines for the naming of streets with specific criteria that must
be followed
• Establish the authority to rename streets and modify address numbers
• Provide procedures for modifying address numbers and street names
• Outline the enforcement procedure for properties that do not comply with this
ordinance
Fiscal Summary
There are no fiscal impacts
February 3, 2010
Council Summary
UV Treatment Facility Contract
ORDINANCE NO. 51
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City
of Bremerton, Washington, amending the Bremerton
Municipal Code to enact a new chapter, Chapter 11 18
entitled "Addressing."
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Bremerton Municipal Code to
enact a new chapter relating to the designation of ways of travel and the addressing of property,
NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. Chapter 11 18 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Addressing" is hereby created to read as follows
Chapter 11.18 ADDRESSING
11.18.010 Purpose.
This chapter provides the procedures and guidelines for regulating addressing within the
City of Bremerton
11.18.015 Powers and Duties of Department.
(a) The City Engineer, or his or her designee, is authorized and empowered to assign
and/or change numerical address designations of buildings and real property.
(b) New addresses shall be assigned in conjunction with an approved building permit
and/or during the plat approval process
(c) Public street names shall be established during the plat approval process or by a
resolution adopted by the City Council Private street names shall be established and approved
by the City Engineer in accordance with this chapter
(d) The City Engineer, or his or her designee, is authorized to administer and
implement the provisions of this chapter and develop policies and procedures necessary to ensure
the proper implementation of these provisions.
(e) The City Engineer, or his or her designee, is authorized and empowered to
designate streets if determined to be in the interest of public safety If there are multiple
segments or branches of a street, it will be at the City Engineer's discretion, in cooperation with
Cencom, as to the number of street names assigned
(f) The processing fees for assignment of new addresses and petitions for street
naming shall be in accordance with BMC 3 01010, Public Works and Utilities - Rate Table G.
(g) The City Engineer, or his or her designee, is authorized and empowered to deviate
from the addressing criteria established by this chapter for the designation of streets and the
addressing of property as deemed necessary for public safety purposes
11.18.020 Address Grid Map.
(a) This chapter recognizes the Kitsap County Official Addressing Map and the
mapping grid established by City Ordinance No. 837, dated June 1, 1928 The maps will be
utilized as a guide for assigning addresses within the City of Bremerton.
1
Addressing
11.18.030 Definitions.
Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following terms shall be defined as
follows.
(a) "Address" means the appropriate combination of address number (numerical
designation), directional prefix or suffix, street name, and street type, e g , 2300 E I I Ih Street
(b) "Address grid system" means the theoretical network established by Kitsap
County and as modified for the 1928 address grid map as established per the City of Bremerton
Ordinance No 837 which is a theoretical network of uniformly spaced horizontal and
perpendicular lines used to establish regularly spaced intervals as the basis for assigning address
numbers
(c) "Avenue" means a way of travel that runs generally north and south
(d) `Boulevard" means a way of travel where the lanes of travel are separated, for
example, by a barrier, landscaped area, or similar divider.
(e) "Circle" means a small, loop -type way of travel where exit and entry are the
same
(f) "Commercial occupancies," for addressing purposes, means all other occupancy
groups not defined as residential occupancies (Typically constructed in accordance with the
International Building Code, for example, commercial occupancies would include retail stores,
office buildings, multifamily residential buildings, hotels, hospitals, schools, warehouses, storage
buildings, churches, etc )
(g) "Court" means a way of travel, which runs generally east and west and ends in a
cul -de -sac
(h) "Cul -de -sac" means a way of travel that dead -ends with provisions for turning
around large emergency and public utility vehicles
(i) "Department" means the City of Bremerton Engineering Division within the
Public Works and Utilities Department
0) "Drive" means an irregular or diagonal way of travel
(k) "Group R occupancies," for addressing purposes, means all occupancies classified
as Group R in accordance with the International Building Code as adopted by the City of
Bremerton as well as all "residential occupancies" as defined herein
(1) "Group U occupancies," for addressing purposes, means all occupancies
classified as Group U in accordance with the International Building Code as adopted by the City
of Bremerton, as well as residential accessory buildings such as outbuildings, detached private
garages, sheds and carports constructed in accordance with the International Residential Code
(m) "Lane" means a way of travel which is usually on private property or road tract
and which is generally maintained with private funds
(n) "Loop" means a way of travel that has two exits or entrances originating from the
same way of travel
(o) "Place" means a way of travel that runs generally north and south and that is
generally parallel to, but shorter than, an avenue and ends in a cul -de -sac
(p) "Private street or road" means a street or road that is on private property and
which is maintained with private funds
(q) "Residential occupancies," for addressing purposes, means detached one- and
two - family dwellings and multiple single - family dwellings (townhouses) not more than three
stories in height with a separate means of egress, and typically constructed in accordance with
the International Residential Code
2
Addressing
(r) "Road" means a way of travel that has been designated as a road or which is an
extension of an existing road
(s) "Street" means a way of travel that runs generally east and west
(t) "Way" means a way of travel that runs generally east and west which is generally
parallel to, but shorter than, a street
(u) "Way of travel" means a roadway of any definition, including, but not limited to,
avenues, boulevards, circles, courts, drives, loops, places, lanes, roads, streets, and ways, which
is capable of carrying vehicular traffic
(v) "Street name sign" means a sign designating the name of a way of travel
11.18.040 Designation of Way of Travel
(a) Ways of travel running generally and predominantly east and west shall have a
numerical designation or a designated name for the entire way of travel in which they are
situated when initially named These shall generally have a street type designated as "Street"
(b) Ways of travel running generally and predominantly east and west but are not a
continuation of an existing numbered street may be designated by a name for the entire way of
travel
(c) Ways of travel running generally and predominantly north and south shall be
designated by a name for the entire way of travel in which they are situated when initially
named These shall generally have a street type designated as "Avenue"
(d) For annexed areas, the names shall remain the same except when deemed
necessary to be changed by the City of Bremerton for clarification for public safety purposes
(e) Ways of travel shall be designated by a name in accordance with Section
11 18.070
11.18.050 Compliance with Adopted Codes
(a) This chapter shall comply with Section 505 of the International Fire Code as
amended by BMC 18 02 060
11.18.060 Numerical Designation of Buildings and Real Property.
(a) Buildings with an occupancy classification other than Group U shall be
designated numerically For measurement purposes in determining the numerical designation, the
location of the main entrance to the property on which the building is situated or unimproved real
property shall be used
(b) Buildings with an occupancy classification of Group U, or buildings accessory to
those that are numerically designated, may be designated numerically at the discretion of the
director provided appropriate justification can be established indicating the need for a separate
numerical designation
(c) Buildings with multiple tenant spaces, suites or dwelling units shall receive one
numerical designation per building.
(d) Community or public facilities without structures, such as parks and utilities, shall
also receive numerical designations
Exceptions
(1) Mini- storage complexes may have one address for multiple buildings
provided each building is designated with the numerical designation of the complex as well as
the individual unit designation and the site plan showing all building and unit designations is
submitted to and approved by the Engineering Division and Fire Department
3
Addressing
(2) Residential duplexes and triplexes shall have separate numerical
designations unless there are not enough numerical designations then each will have a Unit
Number
(3) Residential Units (such as townhouses) with zero lot lines and separate
outside entrances under separate ownership shall have individual numerical designations
(4) Portable classrooms and temporary structures shall use the main building
address unless separate addresses are required by the Fire Department.
(e) Numerical designations shall be assigned based on the geographic direction of the
way of travel, as determined by observing its overall length and noting its general or
predominant direction as follows
(1) Even numerical designations shall be assigned to the north and east sides
of ways of travel and odd numerical designations shall be assigned to the south and west sides of
ways of travel
(2) The numbering for north and south running streets shall begin at 1st Street
and the extension thereof Numbers north of 1st Street shall begin with the One Hundred block
and get larger as they go north Numbers south of 1 st Street shall begin with the One Hundred
Block and get larger as they go south. Note see grid map adopted by City Ordinance No 837,
in 1928
(3) The numbering for the east and west running streets shall begin at the
point at east side of the Port Washington Narrows and begin with the One Hundred block and get
larger away from the Narrows as they proceed in each east or west direction Note see grid map
adopted by City Ordinance No 837, in 1928
(4) The numbering for areas annexed after 1977 shall remain the same
provided they may be changed by the City of Bremerton for clarification for public safety
purposes
(f) From the point of origin, when possible, even and odd numerical designations
shall be assigned sequentially and opposite one another for the entire way of travel in which they
are situated when initially named
Exceptions
(1) Buildings and real property situated on a circle, court, or loop shall be
numbered consecutively beginning at the point of origin and proceeding progressively around
such circle, court or loop in a clockwise direction
(2) Where there is a clear dividmg line at the closed end, one side may be
even and the other side odd numbers
(g) Buildings with multiple tenant spaces, suites or dwelling units shall have the
suites /units further identified with suite, unit or apartment numbers Assignment of suite or
apartment numbers of commercial occupancies shall be from left to right facing the buildings or
units All suite, apartment or unit numbers shall use "100" numbers for units located on the first
floor of buildings, "200" numbers for units located on the second floor, "300" numbers for units
on the third floor, and continue likewise for successive floors Suite, unit or apartment numbers
on floor levels below the first floor (sub -grade levels) shall use the letter "S" preceding the
suite /unit numbers For example, on the floor level immediately below the first floor, "S 100"
numbers shall be used The next floor level down shall use "S200" numbers and continue
likewise for successive sub -grade or basement levels
(1) Multi -unit commercial occupancies, other than Group R, shall have
suite /unit numbers in ten - number increments, whenever possible, to ensure adequate opportunity
for future changes to be numbered in correct order
4
Addressing
(2) Multi -unit commercial occupancies with Group R units shall have
suite /unit numbers consecutively For example, a multi -unit Group R building would have
suite /units 100, 101, 102, 103 on the first floor, suite /units 200, 201, 202, 203 on the second
floor, etc A multi -unit Group R building with interior access corridors may use consecutive even
and odd numbers on opposite sides of the corridor Suite /unit numbers of different floors,
whenever possible, shall be "stacked ", for example, unit 112 should be directly below unit 212,
which would be directly below unit 312, etc
(h) Commercial tenant spaces, suites, or dwelling units that open directly to the face
of the building shall each have a separate whole numerical designation whenever possible
(i) The department is authorized to take all lawful action to change the address
numbers of parcels or units that do not meet the criteria of this chapter Address numbers will be
changed primarily for public safety reasons to ensure that adequate emergency services can be
directed to the address
Address numbers may be changed for the following reasons
(1) When duplicate address numbers are present
(2) When an odd numbered address is located among even numbered
addresses or when an even numbered address is located among odd numbered addresses
(3) In the event the address number is not consistent with the adjacent
addresses (I E 911 Burwell is located between 901 and 905 Burwell),
(4) In the event that the address does not match the proper block number as
required by the street grid map (I E 1100 Burwell is located on the 1400 block of Burwell)
0) The department is authorized to take all lawful action to make address changes to
addresses that do not meet the criteria of this chapter provided all of the following procedures are
followed
(1) A notice of intent to change the address number shall be sent via US Mail
to the property owner and other interested parties This may include the Post Office, CenCom,
and the Fire Department
(2) All notified parties shall have fourteen (14) days to respond to the
department in writing with any comments on the proposed action These comments may be
considered prior to making an administrative decision
(3) If it is determined that the address number should be changed, a Notice of
Administrative Decision to change the address number will be sent via US Mail to all persons
impacted by the proposed action
(4) Appeal of the Administrative Decision may be made to the Administrative
Hearing Examiner in writing within thirty (30) days following the issuance of the notice of
decision in accordance with BMC 2 13 090
(5) When the process is complete, notice will be provided to each parcel
owner notifying them of the new address number assignment The parcel owners shall have the
new address numbers posted within thirty (30) days.
11.18.070 Denoting of Ways of Travel (Street Naming).
(a) Ways of travel may be named when they serve a minimum of three or more
parcels, or three or more buildings with an occupancy group other than Group U Requests for
street names shall be petitioned to, and approved by, the department The street name is the
principal identifying component of a full street name, which in most cases should uniquely
distinguish a street from all others. In addition to emergency response, addresses are used to
record the location of events and objects in databases throughout the county It is important that
5
Addressing
street names be easy to input correctly The following street name criteria reflect that need as
well as the needs of emergency response
(1) No street name shall be used more than once For example, two streets
may not be named Cedar even if they have different street types
(2) Street names shall not sound alike For example, two streets may not be
named Stephen and Steven
(3) Names that tend to be mispronounced or misspelled shall not be used For
example, names like Javelina, Weimaraner, and Perseverance are either hard to spell or
pronounce and would be subject to increased scrutiny during the name review process
(4) Street names should be limited to thirteen characters or less
(5) Two -word names that sound like one -word names, or one -word names
that sound like two -word names shall not be used For example, names like Clearlake, Clear
Lake, and Baytree would not be acceptable
(6) Names that include directional words such as North, South, East, or West
shall be avoided For example, North East Beach would not be acceptable
(7) Names that include punctuation shall be used without the punctuation For
example, George's Rd would be approved as NW Georges Rd
(8) No segment of any street shall have more than one name For example,
Riddell Road on one side of the street and Riddell Road NW on the other side of the street
(9) The department shall promote street name continuity For example, a
private or unmaintained city or county street extending from the end of a dead -end city or county
maintained street shall retain the same name as the city or county street
(10) Street names shall not include any of the road types listed in Section
11 18 030 - Definitions For example, Mountain Loop Rd would not be an acceptable name
(b) Street name changes may be initiated by the City of Bremerton when the street
name fails to meet the criteria in subsection (a) of this section The department shall work in
cooperation with CenCom and other departments in making changes Except as detailed in this
section, existing street names shall not be required to meet the criteria of this chapter
(c) The department is authorized to take all lawful action to change a street name that
does not meet the criteria of this chapter provided all of the following procedures are followed
(1) A notice of intent to change the street name shall be sent via US Mail to
all persons impacted by the proposed action This may include the owners of properties which
are currently addressed on that street, the Post Office, CenCom, and the Fire Department.
(2) All notified parties shall have fourteen (14) days to respond to the
department in writing with any comments on the proposed action These comments shall be
considered prior to making an administrative decision
(3) If it is determined that the street name should be changed, a Notice of
Administrative Decision to change the street name will be sent via US Mail to all persons
impacted by the proposed action
(4) Appeal of the Administrative Decision may be made to the Administrative
Hearing Examiner in writing within thirty (30) days following the issuance of the notice of
decision in accordance with BMC 2 13 090
(5) When the street naming process is complete, notice shall be provided to
each parcel owner notifying them of the new street name
(d) All new or replaced road name signs shall be constructed and placed pursuant to
the City of Bremerton public works sign standards. Costs and maintenance of any road signs for
6
Addressing
a private or unmaintained street shall be the sole responsibility of the parcel owners on said
street
11.18.090 Display of Designations.
(a) The owner, occupant, tenant, lessee or any other person or entity having an
interest in any addressed building shall conspicuously display the numerical designation assigned
to such building The numerical designation shall be easily legible with numerals displayed upon
a contrasting background, for example, black on white, or white on blue, etc. Whenever possible,
numerical designations should not be placed on window glazing
(1) New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers,
building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible
and visible from the street or road fronting the property These numbers shall contrast with their
background Address numbers shall be Arabic numbers or alphabetical letters Numbers shall
be a minimum of four (4) inches high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch Where access is
by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument,
pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure
(2) Housing developments which contain one hundred or more dwelling units
which alley ways are or may be used for access to dwelling units shall have four (4) inch high
minimum house numbers including street designation included The street designation may be a
smaller size, but no less than two (2) inches in size
(3) Address numbers for commercial buildings shall be twelve (12) inches
high and contrast with the background Individual unit/suite or space numbers or letter shall be
six (6) inches high, contrasting with the background, and visible from the approach side or angle
(b) Premises Identification Approved numbers or address shall be posted for all new
and existing buildings in such a position, facing the way of travel, as to be plainly visible and
legible from the street or road fronting the property If the numerical designation of the building
is not clearly visible from a named way of travel, the numerical designation shall also be
displayed near the main entrance to the property and the driveway entrance upon which the
building is situated During the construction of buildings, the numerical designation shall be
posted at the premises prior to requesting any department inspections
11.18.100 Enforcement.
(a) The City Engineer or City Code Enforcement Officer is authorized to enforce this
chapter, in accordance with Chapter 104 BMC
SECTION 2. SeverabiltU If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect
SECTION 3. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
7
Addressing
PASSED by the City Council the day of , 2011
WELL MAUPIN, Council President
Approved this day of , 2011
PATTY LENT, Mayor
ATTEST- APPROVED AS TO FORM
SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk ROGER A LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of , 2011
EFFECTIVE the day of , 2011
ORDINANCE NO
R \Legal\Lega1 \0rdmances\Pubhc Works & Utilities\Addressing -Final doc
8
Addressing
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL (Da
SUBJECT: Renewal of Annual Funding Study Session Date - g4P2 t l .2/1 I
Commitment to Admiral Theatre Foundation COUNCIL MEETING Date
Department Financial Servers
Presenter Becky Hasart
Phone 473 -5722
SUMMARY: The City entered into a First Addendum to Operating Agreement with the Admiral
Theatre Foundation in December of 2001 for the purposes of providing ongoing funding for the
operations of the Admiral Theatre and to clarify the conditions under which the continuation of
funding support would be provided Provisions in this agreement call for the City Council to renew its
commitment to the $90,000 /year fund amount every three years throughout the term of the contract
The agreement anticipates that the commitment will be renewed so long as the Foundation has used
the funds in the manner anticipated and met the ongoing requirements of the contract The three
year review was missed in 2010 but has been concluded in 2011 and is being presented during the
Council's consideration of the 2012 budget It is the recommendation of the Director of Financial
Services that the City Council renew its commitment of the current funding amount of $90,000 per
year
ATTACHMENTS: Explanatory Memo and reports from the City's Internal Auditor and Facilities
Maintenance department G, QroQo�� s \O\
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) Ongoing commitment of $90,000 per year from the
City's collected hotel /motel tax. This amount is included in the 2012 proposed budget
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY _-
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to renew the City of Bremerton's commitment to the Admiral
Theatre Foundation per Operating Agreement and First Addendum to Operating Agreement
(Agreements) subject to the proposed amendments and authorize the City Attorney to amend the
Agreements consistent with the proposed language and further authorize the Mayor to execute the
same.
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ C onkent Agenda General Business E] Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 11/02/2011
I
3'
Memorandum
To: Mayor Patty Lent
Becky Hasart, Director of Financial Services
From: Cathy Johnson, Asst Director of Financial Services
Re: Admiral Theatre Agreement — Contract Review
Date: November 4, 2011
In December of 2001 the City of Bremerton entered into the "First Addendum to
Operating Agreement with the Admiral Theatre Foundation" for the purposes of
providing ongoing funding for the operations of the Admiral Theatre and to clarify
the conditions under which the continuation of funding support would be
provided The summarized terms of the agreement are as follows
Term - Expires on September 27, 2040
Building Maintenance — The Foundation is solely responsible for maintaining
the theatre property and improvements therein in good condition The City shall
have no responsibility for building maintenance, repairs, or damage to the
structure, except to the extent insurance proceeds are available to cover any
loss
Financial Contribution - Commencing in calendar year 2002 the City shall pay
to the Foundation Ninety Thousand Dollars ($90,000 00) and a like amount each
and every year thereafter Provided, however, the obligation to pay this amount
is conditioned upon the following
a) The Foundation properly maintaining the Theatre and its facilities,
b) The Foundation continuing to market and provide performing and
visual arts at the Theatre on a full -time basis, including education
and cultural events,
c) The Foundation making available to the City's internal auditor all
financial information deemed appropriate to determine that the
Theatre is using its funds in accordance with its non - profit purpose
and the purpose of the City's existing agreements with the
Foundation,
d) The Foundation providing to the City an external audit on a bi-
annual basis, commencing in 2003, and the results of that audit
showing no significant irregularity,
e) The City's hotel /motel tax generates at least $90,000 each year for
each 2% of tax imposed, and
f) The City Council, in 2004, and every three (3) years thereafter,
renews its commitment to the above referenced funding amount or
such other amount as it deems within the best interest of the City
and its citizens It is anticipated that the $90,000 commitment will
be renewed after each three (3) year review, so long as the
Foundation has used the funds in a manner that the Council
deems as promoting the best interests of the City and its citizens
and the purposes of the Hotel /Motel tax enabling legislation
The most recent review was completed in 2007 The review scheduled for 2010
was not completed prior to the adoption of the 2011 budget and is being provided
at this time in conjunction with the review of the 2012 budget The City's internal
auditor has reviewed financial reports provided by the Admiral Theatre
Foundation and in conjunction with the City's Facilities staff toured the Theatre
property to determine the condition of the facility Their reports are included with
this memorandum
After reviewing the information collected, I have concluded the following
a) Maintenance of the facilities appears to be adequate Some repairs and
maintenance needs were noted and are being shared with the Foundation
to be included in their future maintenance plans
b) Marketing and provision of performing visual arts (including education and
cultural events) continue to be provided at the levels of prior years
c) Financial information has been made available to the City as requested
and as deemed appropriate to determine that the Theatre is using funds in
accordance to Agreement expectations
d) The most recent external audit report available is for the year ended
August 31, 2008 and received an unqualified opinion from the auditor The
Finance Director for the Foundation was not aware of the audit
requirement and to correct that oversight, a CPA firm has been engaged
to audit the report for the year ended August 31, 2011
e) The City's hotel /motel tax generated more than $90,000 each year for
each 2% of tax imposed The following is the hotel /motel tax receipts for
the period 2006 through 2011
City of Bremerton Lodging Tax Receipts
Year Amount
2006 $333,577
2007 $331,093
2008 $ 317,385
2009 $ 362,410
2010 $ 347,792
2011 Budget $ 380,000
2
Based upon the results of this review and given that the Agreement expressly
anticipates that the $90,000 commitment will be renewed after each three (3)
year review, so long as the Foundation has used the funds in a manner that the
Council deems as promoting the best interests of the City and its citizens and the
purposes of the Hotel /Motel tax enabling legislation — it is my recommendation
that the City Council be requested to renew its commitment to the current
funding amount of $90,000 /year with staff to conduct the next three year
review in 2014.
3
Gary W. Nystul CPA CFE
City Auditor
345 Sixth Street Suite 600
- s=-� Bremerton, WA 98337 -1873
360.473.5369
CITY AUDITOR
September 14, 2011
Honorable Patty Lent, Mayor
The First Addendum to the Operating Agreement between the City and the Admiral
Theatre Foundation requires the City Auditor to examine financial information to
determine that the theatre is using its funds in accordance with its non - profit purpose and
the purpose of the Agreement and the First Addendum The Agreement fails to state
when this review is to take place or for what period of time
I have reviewed the compiled financial statements of the Admiral Theatre Foundation for
the years ending August 31, 2009 and 2010 I have also reviewed the last audit report
which was for the year ending August 31, 2008, IRS form 990 for 8/31/2010, and a
listing of events for 2009 and 2010
From this information it appears the Foundation is using its funds in accordance with its
non - profit purpose and the purpose of the Agreement and First Addendum
The Foundation did not comply with the provision in the Amendment requiring an
external audit on a bi- annual basis, commencing in 2003 The last audit was for 2008
Their Director of Finance stated that he was not aware of this requirement He reports
that a CPA firm has been engaged to audit the dust completed year and that they will
obtain an audit for next year
The Addendum requires the City Council in 2004 and every three years thereafter to
renew its commitment to funding the Foundation This action was last done by the City
Council in September 2007.
Si ely,
Gary W Nystul
cc. Members of the City Council
erector of Financial Services
H \,Admiral TheatreTtr review Sept 2011 doc
Public Works and Utilities Department
100 Oyster Bay Ave N • Bremerton, WA 98312 • (360) 478 -5920 • FAX (360) 478 -5360
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 16, 2011
TO: Cathy Johnson, Financial Services Manager
CC: Wayne Hamilton, Utilities Operations Manager
Gary Nystul, City Auditor
FROM: Chris Mottner, Inventory/Facilities Supervisor
SUBJECT: Admiral Theater Facility Review
Cathy, as per your request, we attended the scheduled walk - through of the Admiral Theater on
August 4` to evaluate the facility, as required by the operating agreement
The facility is in good condition and the Admiral Theater Foundation has completed many
improvements and maintenance projects since last inspection/evaluation period
There were only a couple of concerns and recommendations to report They are as follows
• All main section roof drains need to be cleaned and kept clear of debris by regular
maintenance
• The marquee roof /cover needs to be cleaned of accumulated material and the marquee
roof top drain needs to be kept clean of debris by regular maintenance
• The bird deterrent netting on the marquee roof needs repairs to some sections, to prevent
additional problems to this area
(Please see attached photos of these concerns.)
Please let me know if you have any questions about this facility evaluation report
Facility File Admiral Theater
C
L
0
4-
O
O
C
O
U
N
CO
C
Z
f
r 6 1
If
kA
g 5
, r if�
,�•• _ 'ew;�{' ) + � ti � "?# ��'1 t � �`Y�`��� 7 4'� t 6 " � y � r � 4 6s4 �,[�,j ° r �P��a111 � � �
J
c '
! p
fl k l
M
Marquee Roof /Cover
x�� �titi
�yyyy {y � — N
��h
ro w, y j 'Z4�' al
dl b
7z p ,O
0
6 �
� 'M
1 l
7'" +�
Proposed Amendments to Operating Agreement
and First Addendum to Operating Agreement
The Foundation shall provide an internal audit report to the City on a bi -annual basis
commencing in calendar year 2014 and due by August 30 for each bi- annual period The
audit shall cover the previous two years of operations and be issued by a Certified Public
Accountant
The Foundation shall provide an external audit report to the City on a five -year basis
commencing in calendar year 2017 and due by August 30 for each five -year period The
audit shall cover the previous two years of operations and be issued by a Certified Public
Accountant
In calendar year 2012, the City shall pay the Foundation a contribution (Contribution) of
$90,000 subject to the terms of the Operating Agreement and First Addendum to Operating
Agreement
Commencing in 2013, the City shall pay the Foundation a Contribution of $150,000 annually
for a period of five (5) years subject to the existing terms of the Operating Agreement and
First Addendum to Operating Agreement and further subject to the following
I Commencing in Calendar year 2018 the annual Contribution shall automatically
revert to $90,000 unless otherwise extended or adjusted by the parties in writing
following after receipt of the external audit
2 The Foundation shall not apply for or be eligible for additional lodging tax funds
provided the City's contribution is $150,000 annually
Page 1 of 2
From Tim Lavin [tim @admiraltheatre org]
Sent- Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10 05 AM
To City Council
Subject Proposed change to the First Addendum to the City of Bremerton Operating Agreement and the
Admiral Theatre, Greg Wheeler, Jim McDonald
Greg and Jim, thank you for your support of the Admiral Theatre and assisting us in the most
efficient and effective manner to propose the changes we discussed regarding our current
contract with the City of Bremerton As discussed in previous conversations, two significant
economic events have transpired in the past nine months that have lead to our request to
modify our agreement, (1) the loss of Ike Parker estate money that has been received by the
Admiral over the past years This amount in fiscal 2011 was over $160,000 that must be
replaced through operations and (2) an investment that has been made in the amount of
$120,000 into a new kitchen at the Admiral that will lead to more self reliance in the future with
regard to additional revenue sources
In addition, as a result of the recent recommendation of the Lodging Tax Committee, the
Admiral Theatre's portion of that allocation dropped by $30,000 from the previous year or 40%
The Admiral Theatre over the years has always worked with the City of Bremerton and is
extremely grateful for the support of the City and more importantly want to continue that
amicable relationship in the future We and the City must work together to make sure that the
jewel continues as a going concern
This being said, the Admiral Theatre requests from the City Council a modification to the First
Addendum to our Operating Agreement signed December 19 2001 Specifically would like to
change the wording in section five Financial Contribution to read as follows, "Commencing in
calendar year 2012 the City shall pay to the Foundation One - Hundred and Fifty Thousand
Dollars ($150,000) annually Provided, however, the obligation to pay this amount is conditioned
upon the following A the Foundation properly maintaining the Theatre and its facilities (no
change to current addendum) B the Foundation continuing to market and provide performing
and visual arts at the Theatre on a full -time basis, including education and cultural events (no
change to current addendum) C the Foundation making available to the City's internal auditor
all financial information he deems appropriate to determine that the Theatre is using its funds in
accordance with its non - profit purpose and the purpose of the Agreement and the First
Addendum thereto (no change to the current addendum) D The Foundation providing to the
City and external audit every five years commencing in 2012, and the results of that audit
showing no significant irregularity (change from the original contract — would reduce our audit
fees Presently paying almost $10,000 of allocated funds to audit rather compilation Current
staff has two CPAs and Board Finance Committee also has two CPAs E Strike the entire
section Admiral Foundation would no longer be subject to an allocation of the lodging tax every
year but would be funded as detailed above F the City Council, in 2012, and every three (3)
years thereafter, renews its commitment to the above - referenced funding amount or such other
amount as it deems within the best interests of the City and its citizens It is anticipated the
$150,000 commitment will be renewed after each three (3) year review, so long as the
Foundation has used the funds in a manner that the Council deems as promoting the best
interests of the City and its citizens
In summary Greg, the Admiral Theatre requests that the addendum be changed to ensure (1)
an annual funding of $150,000, (2) no longer subject to the allocation process with regard to the
lodging tax and (3) increasing the years between audit financial statements from three to five,
Again, thank you Greg and the Council for your past and future support of the Admiral Theatre,
11/23/2011
Page 2 of 2
Tim Lavin
Finance Director
Admiral Theatre Foundation
515 Pacific Ave, Bremerton WA 98337 -1916
V (360) 373 -6810 F (360) 405 -0673
11/23/2011
Page 1 of 2
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12 55 PM
To City Council
Subject FW Response to Admiral Theater request for follow -up information (Roy Runyon)
Attn Council Members
From: Tim Lavin [mailto tim @admiraltheatre org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1141 AM
To: City Council, Ruth Enderle, Brian Johnson
Subject: RE Admiral Theater request for follow -up information
Good morning Jim and Greg Ruth and I received this email last night from Christine on behalf of
Councilmen Runyon We will be providing this information today I Just want to express to you that the
information that is being asked for appears to me to have little relevance to the changes that we have
requested to the contract with the City Although this invaluable information, never has the allocation
process been based upon the amount of lodging tax revenue that a particular organization is
responsible If that were the case, I would guess that many of the organizations receiving lodging tax
allocations would receive very little or possible nothing Thanks Tim
Here is the information Mr Runyon has requested
(1) Returns $2 7 million to the local economy
(2) Creates 80 1 full -time equivalent Jobs
(3) Returns $255,000 to Local /State Government revenues
(4) Creates $16 million in household income
Source Arts and Economic Prosperity III, 2007, Americans for the Arts, and is endorsed by National
League of Cities, the United States Conference of Mayors and National Association of Counties,
(2) Arts and Economic Prosperity III, 2007, Americans for the Arts, and is endorsed by National
League of Cities, the United States Conference of Mayors and National Association of Counties
(3) $5,000 (2,500 rooms x estimated $100 per room x 2%
Thanks Tim Lavin
From: Christine Grenier [madto. Chnsbne.GrenierC&ci bremerton wa us ] On Behalf Of City Council
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 20114 20 PM
To: Ruth Enderle
Cc: Tim Lavin
Subject: Admiral Theater request for follow -up information
12/7/2011
Page 2 of 2
Good afternoon, Ruth
Please respond to the following questions and I will provide your response to the Council Members for
consideration at the Council Meeting tomorrow night
Sincerely,
Christine Grenier
Council/Auditor Assistant
City of Bremerton
(360) 473 -5280
From: Roy Runyon [madto d4bremerton @yahoo com
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 20114-36 PM
To: City Council
Cc: d4bremerton @yahoo com
Subject: Admiral Theater request follow -up information
Here are my follow -up information requests and questions for the Admiral Theater related to their
request for a larger annual set -aside of Lodging Tax (LT)
1 Mr Johnson listed a number of economic impacts to our local economy Please provide those
impacts to the Council in written form along with how the numbers were derived and the source(s) of
the information
2 A council member claimed the Admiral Theater generated 2500 room nights for, I assume 2011 (so
far)
If this is the case, what is the source of this information and how do we know it's correct?
3 If the 2500 room night figure is correct, how much LT was generated from these stays?
I look forward to receiving this information
- -Roy
12/7/2011
I %I.
VOL
BOAT
SHEO
RESTAURANT /BAR
Pft
360 377 -2600
101 SHORE DRIVE
BREMERTON
WASH 98310
Bremerton City Council
345 Sixth Street Suite 600
Bremerton, Washington 98337
Dear City Council Members,
I understand you are considering funding to support the Admiral Theatre
Foundations' efforts to continue a performing arts program at the downtown
Admiral Theatre.
The theatre program clearly creates business for the Boat Shed on event nights,
and we would miss seeing those customers if they were to attend a theatre
elsewhere.
Please consider voting in favor of the Foundation' request to be funded at
approximately 10% of its budget. This seem reasonable, as it also demonstrates
the great support from the private community to keep the historic theatre open if
downtown Bremerton.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Brett Hayfield, Owner
The Boat Shed
Page 1 of 2
Lori Smith
I L
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12 55 PM
To City Council
Subject FW Response to Admiral Theater request for follow -up information (Roy Runyon)
Attn Council Members
From: Tim Lavin [mailto tim @admiraltheatre.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 11 41 AM
To: City Council, Ruth Enderle, Brian Johnson
Subject: RE Admiral Theater request for follow -up information
Good morning Jim and Greg Ruth and I received this email last night from Christine on behalf of
Councilmen Runyon We will be providing this information today I dust want to express to you that the
information that is being asked for appears to me to have little relevance to the changes that we have
requested to the contract with the City Although this in valuable information, never has the allocation
process been based upon the amount of lodging tax revenue that a particular organization is
responsible If that were the case, I would guess that many of the organizations receiving lodging tax
allocations would receive very little or possible nothing Thanks Tim
Here is the information Mr Runyon has requested
(1) Returns $2 7 million to the local economy
(2) Creates 80 1 full -time equivalent Jobs
(3) Returns $255,000 to Local /State Government revenues
(4) Creates $16 million in household income
Source Arts and Economic Prosperity III, 2007, Americans for the Arts, and is endorsed by National
League of Cities, the United States Conference of Mayors and National Association of Counties,
(2) Arts and Economic Prosperity III, 2007, Americans for the Arts, and is endorsed by National
League of Cities, the United States Conference of Mayors and National Association of Counties
(3) $5,000 (2,500 rooms x estimated $100 per room x 2%
Thanks Tim Lavin
From: Christine Grenier [mailto Christine Grenier@ci bremerton wa us ] On Behalf Of City Council
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 20114 20 PM
To: Ruth Enderle
Cc: Tim Lavin
Subject: Admiral Theater request for follow -up information
12/7/2011
Page 2 of 2
Good afternoon, Ruth
Please respond to the following questions and I will provide your response to the Council Members for
consideration at the Council Meeting tomorrow night
Sincerely,
Christine Grenier
Council/Auditor Assistant
City of Bremerton
(360) 473 -5280
From: Roy Runyon [mailto: d4bremerton @yahoo com
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 20114 36 PM
To: City Council
Cc: d4bremerton 0yahoo com
Subject: Admiral Theater request follow -up information
Here are my follow -up information requests and questions for the Admiral Theater related to their
request for a larger annual set -aside of Lodging Tax (LT)
I Mr Johnson listed a number of economic impacts to our local economy Please provide those
impacts to the Council in written form along with how the numbers were derived and the source(s) of
the information
2 A council member claimed the Admiral Theater generated 2500 room nights for, I assume 2011 (so
far)
If this is the case, what is the source of this information and how do we know it's correct?
3 If the 2500 room night figure is correct, how much LT was generated from these stays?
I look forward to receiving this information
- -Roy
12/7/2011
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL (OCO
■■ eeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeseeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeseeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeee
SUBJECT: Resolution No 3 Study Session Date 11/30/2011
ratifying the Krtsap Countywide Planning COUNCIL MEETING Date 12/07/2011
Policies as adopted by the Board of County Department DCD
Commissioners Presenter Andrea L Spencer
Phone 360 473 5283
SUMMARY: The Krtsap Countywide Planning Policies (CPP's) are a regional framework prepared
by local governments to coordinate jurisdictional growth planning as directed by the State Growth
Management Act The CPP's were originally adopted and ratified by all Krtsap County local
governments in 1992, and they have been amended several times in the years since In 2010 and 2011
the Krtsap Regional Coordinating Council (KRCC) and each of the Planning Directors in Krtsap
began work to update and amend the CPP's to make them consistent with the Puget Sound Regional
Council's Vision 2040 Multi- County Planning Policies On May 24, 2011 the KRCC Board
recommended policy revisions, and forwarded the revised CPP's to Krtsap County for adoption
The Krtsap Board of County Commissioners passed Ordinance No 476 -2011 on November 14, 2011
adopting the revised CPP's with three modifications to the KRCC's recommended policies (Krtsap
County's edits are shown in red in the Resolution's Exhibit A, and summarized here as 1) Modified
language for "Fully Contained Communities" 2) Added SEPA reference to Appendix A, and 3)
Removed all changes to Appendix B Population Distribution)
City Council ratification of the amendments is requested to be compliant with the procedures outlined
in the CPP's (please see Appendix A of the CPP's for the ratification process)
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution with Exhibit A — Countywide Planning Policies
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) No anticipated fiscal impacts
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Resolution No 31,5 $ ratifying the Krtsap
Countywide Planning Policies with 2011 amendments as revised and adopted by the Krtsap County
Board of Commissioners on November 14, 2011
STUDY SESSION ACTION- ❑ZConzt Agendda � General Business E] Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT -
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 11/02/2011
RESOLUTION NO. 3 158
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, ratifying amendments to the Kitsap
Countywide Planning Policies
WHEREAS, a Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) is a written policy statement
or statements used solely for establishing a countywide framework from which County and City
comprehensive plans are developed and adopted to ensure that City and County comprehensive
plans are consistent; and
WHEREAS, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council (KRCC) originally
adopted CPPs in 1992 to coordinate countywide planning among local jurisdictions, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and appropriate to update and revise CPPs
periodically to assist the coordination of local planning to keep current with changing conditions
and expectations; and
WHEREAS, the KRCC concluded the 2010 -2011 CPP update process with a set
of recommended amendments and additions to the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners on
May 24, 2011, and
WHEREAS, the Kitsap County Board of County Commissioners adopted the
revised CPPs with the passage of Kitsap County Ordinance No. 476 -2011 on November 14,
2011, with modification to the KRCC's recommendations by amending the text related to Fully
Contained Communities, adding reference to SEPA review on the Ratification diagram in
Appendix A, and removing all edits to Appendix B, Population Distribution; and
WHEREAS, under the amendment procedures incorporated in the CPPs, revisions
to the CPPs adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on November 14, 2011, do not take
effect until ratified by cities and Tribes within Kitsap County, and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton considers the CPPs as amended and adopted
by the Board of County Commissioners by Ordinance No 476 -2011 on November 14, 2011, to
be of benefit to the planning, development and growth interests of the City and County; NOW
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS.
SECTION I. The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies as amended and adopted
by the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners on November 14, 2011 and attached hereto as
Exhibit A are hereby ratified.
1
Countywide Planning Policies
SECTION 2. Severabdify If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences
of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and
effect
SECTION 3. Effective Date This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this
day of 3 2011
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk
2
Countywide Planning Policies
Exhibit A
Countywide Planning Policies
Blue Denotes proposed revisions to the 2007 Adopted Kitsap CPP's
recommended to Kitsap County by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council on May 24, 2011
Red Denotes proposed revisions to the 2007 Adopted Kitsap CPP's
proposed by Kitsap County during the adoption process
Proposed Revisions to the
Adopted Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies
November 19, 2007
Attached are the Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies as adopted by the Kitsap
County Board of Commissioners by ordinance on November 19, 2007 (Ordinance
403- 2007).The Countywide Planning Policies as revised are currently in effect in
Kitsap County
The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies are the framework for growth management
in Kitsap County Under the Growth Management Act, the Puget Sound Region is
defined as King, Kitsap, Snohomish and Pierce Counties The Puget Sound Regional
Council is responsible for developing the four -county regional transportation and land
use vision The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies tailor the Puget Sound Regional
Council's regional growth management guidelines to Kitsap County and are the
policy framework for the County's and the Cities' comprehensive plans The Kitsap
Countywide Planning Policies address 14 separate elements, ranging from urban
growth areas to affordable housing.
The Countywide Planning Policies are required by the Growth Management Act
and may be appealed (only) by Cities and the Governor of Washington The
original Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies (adopted by Kitsap County in 1992)
and subsequent revisions (August 2001, December 2003, November 2004,
November 2007, LMonth of adoptionJ. 2011 were developed through amulti-
junsdictional collaboration sponsored by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
among Kitsap County, the Cities of Bremerton, Bainbridge Island, Port Orchard &
Poulsbo, the Suquamish & Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribes, the Navy, the Port of
Bremerton, and Kitsap Transit.
Kitsap County is lead agency for its environmental review.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
t
A49vember 19 200
CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION 3
POLICY ELEMENTS
A Countywide Growth Pattern (CW) .. 5
B. Urban Growth Areas (UGA) 7
C Centers of Growth (C) 4-213
D. Rural Land Uses and Development Patterns (R) .. .15
E. Countywide Strategies for Open Space Preservation, Resource Protection
And Critical Areas, Air Quality, and Water Quality /Quanti(y (PPCA&W) 17
F Contiguous, Compatible, and Orderly Development (CCOD) . 20
G. Siting Public Capital Facilities (CF) .22
H. Transportation (T) .... 24
I. Aff-erdalblee-Housing (AH) . ... 3931
J. Countywide Economic Development (ED) .... ... 3435
K. An Analysis of the Fiscal Impact (FI). ......... 3337
L Coordination with Tribal Governments (CT) . ..... .... .... 3638
M Coordination with Federal Government including Navy (CF) .. ..... 3 -739
N. Roles & Responsibilities (RR) .. .. ..... 3
APPENDIX
A Ratification Process a
B. B -1 Population Distribution bb = 1
B -2 New Housing Units & Employment In Urban Areas bb = 2
Comprehensive Plan Proiections
C. Urban Growth Area Management Agreements c
D. Revenue Sharing Interlocal Agreement (adopted December, 2001) d
E Current Organizational Interlocal Agreement e
F Regional and Kitsap- Designated Centers List f
G Centers & Limited Areas of More Intensive Rural Development (LAMIRD) Matrix g
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
2
Xevembei- 19L, :300
INTRODUCTION
The Growth Management Act (GMA) is founded on the principle that it is in the best interest of the
citizens of the State to foster coordination and cooperation among units of local and state government.
Cities and counties must engage in a collaborative planning process under the requirements of the Act.
Specifically, the Act states that, "THE LEGISLATURE FINDS THAT UNCOORDINATED AND UNPLANNED
GROWTH POSE A THREAT TO THE ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND THE
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE ENJOYED BY RESIDENTS OF THE STATE IT IS IN THE PUBLIC
INTEREST THAT CITIZENS, COMMUNITIES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR COOPERATE AND
COORDINATE WITH ONE ANOTHER IN COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANNING " To ,eutde the development of
comprehensive plans and development regulations, the GMA sets forth planning goals (RCW
36 70A 020) in 13 areas
1 Urban Growth 8 Natural Resource Industries
2 Reduce Sprawl 9. Open Space and Recreation
3 Transportation 10 Environment
4 Housing 11 Citizen Participation and Coordination
S Economic Development 12 Public Facilities and Services
6 Proper Rt hts 13 Historic Preservation
7 Permits
The Growth Management Act (RCW 36 70A 210) states that "A COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICYISA
WR17TEN POLICYSTATEMENT OR STATEMENTS USED SOLELYFOR ESTABLISHING A COUNTYWIDE FRAMEWORK
FROM WHICH COUNTY AND CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLANS ARE DEVELOPED AND ADOPTED (TO) ENSURE
THAT CITYAND COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLANS ARE CONSISTENT "as required m RCW 36 70A 100
"NOTHING IN THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO ALTER THE LAND USE POWERS OF CITIES " The
Act requires that the countywide policy be collaboratively developed among Cities and the County
Further, "FEDERAL AGENCIES AND INDIAN TRIBES MAY PARTICIPATE IN AND COOPERATE WITH THE
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICYADOPTION PROCESS " These policies may also be used for other
purposes requiring collaboration and cooperation in addition to the development and adoption of
comprehensive plans.
Vision 2040 (adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council during 2010) serves as the long range
growth management, environmental, economic development, and transportation strategy for Kings
Kitsap. Pierce, and Snohomish Counties Vision 2040 includes the Regional Growth Strategy Multi -
CounU Planning Policies (RCW 36 70A 210) and Implementation Actions
The 1992 Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent revisions in 2001,80d 2003, 2007,and
2011, were developed by a committee of planners representing Kitsap County, the City of Bremerton,
the City of Port Orchard, the City of Poulsbo, the City of Bainbridge Island, the Port Gamble
S'Klallam Tribe, the Suquamrsh Tribe, the Navy, and Kitsap Transit.' At each point, the Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council conducted a public hearing and prepared a recommendation for
adoption by the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners and ratification by Cities and Tribes. The
process of review and discussion through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council forum is intended
to foster consensus whenever possible. County and City Comprehensive Plans must be consistent with
the adopted Countywide Planing Policies
The Kam County Health District and Kitsap Economic Development Alliance (KEDA) also reviewed and
commented upon the 2011 amendment proposals
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
3
Xqvember 19, 200
Policies for Update and Ratification (UR)
1 The Kitsap Countywide Planting Policies should be dynamic and regularly monitored for
applicability and effectiveness
a. The adopted Countywide Planning Policies should be reviewed through the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council process at least every five years Proposed revisions shall be reviewed
for impacts according to the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) and shall be
consistent with the State Growth Management Act (GMA)
b The County or a City may propose a policy amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies
2 Proposed amendments should be considered on a regular basis and voting is subject to the Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council by -laws
a. Kitsap County shall take action to consider and adopt amendments or revisions to the
Countywide Planning Policies following recommendation from the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council
b. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council will strive for ratification by all Cities and Tribes
during the 90 days following the Board of County Commissioners' adoption of its subject
ordinance. The adopted CPP will become effective upon ratification by three or more cities in
Kitsap County
c A City or Tribal Council that does not ratify the revised Countywide Planning Policies within
90 days of the Board of County Commissioners' adoption of its subject ordinance shall
provide a written statement of its objections to the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, in
order to facilitate further review (See Appendix A for process flow chart)
d Once the ratified revisions to the Countywide Planning Policies take effect, a City or the
Governor's office may appeal the revisions to the Growth Management Hearings Board
within a further 60 day period
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
4 200;Z
Element A. Countywide Growth Pattern
The vision for the future of Krtsap County, —as W#_iewlated in the Kdtsap County Comprehensive Plan
((991 } "seeks to maintain and enhance the quality of life that makes our County a special place to live and
work envision a future in which our natural systems are protected, the water quality in our lakes, streams
and
Puget Sound is enhanced, the village character of some of our smaller towns is preserved, the historical
nature of our communities is respected in order to preserve our heritage for future generations, a diversified
economic base that supports good jobs, contributes to healthy downtowns in our cities and affordable
housing choices; the rural appearance of our county is perpetuated
This vision of the future, shared by citizens and elected officials, includes the following elements
a. Livable urban communities and neighborhoods, centers for employment, civic activities, housing
• Attractive, well designed, bike /pedestrian friendly and livable urban communities, enhanced by
preserved historic properties and neighborhoods, that are supported by efficient and high quality
services and facilities, and provide a range of housing choices
• Healthy cities that are the region's centers for employment, affordable housing choices, and
civic and cultural activities
b. Vital diversified economy An economy that provides training education, and living wage fobs for
residents, supported by adequate buildable land for a range of employment uses and that encourages
accomplishment of local economic development goals as articulated in the Krtsap Economic
Development Alliance's adopted plan, Krtsap 20120: A Straker for Sustainable Economic Prosperity.
c Efficient multi -modal transportation system Creation of an efficient, clean, and sustainable multi -
modal transportation system – including roads and highways, public transportation, ferries, airports, and
opportunities for non - motorized travel – that provides efficient access and mobility for county
residents, andsupports our land use pattern.
d Natural systems protection
• Protection and enhancement of the natural environment, including wetlands, streams, wildlife
habitat, shorelines, water quality, air, climate, and natural resource aefimies-
• Creation of a system of open space, trails, parks, and greenbelts that provide opportunities for
recreation and that give structure and separation to urban areas.
e. Rural character: Maintenance of the traditional character, appearance, economic and ecological
functions, and lifestyles of Krtsap County's rural communities and areas to include the production and
distribution oflocally &own food
f. Responsive Government An efficient and responsive government that works in partnership with
citizens, governmental entities and Tribes to meet collective needs fairly; and that supports education,
environmental protection and human services
A key strategy to accomplish this vision is the intention to encourage future urban growth in areas within
incorporated cities and in unincorporated areas that are already characterized by urban growth with existing
and planned services and facilities These actions will work to strengthen our natural environment and rural
character, and are geared to reduce taxpayer costs by focusing the expenditure of public funds, encouraging
concentrated development where appropriate, and increasing our choices for housing and fobs."
dFa, un from the Yvits G -„ eafftj Pl 199
Balancing historical patterns of growth with a preferred vision of the future and legal requirements
is an on -going challenge Tradeoffs must be made to balance the costs with the gains, flexibility is
necessary to adapt to changing conditions These policies are intended to reflect the long -term
goals of the people living, working and doing business here
Policies for Countywide Growth Pattern (CV)
1. Roles of Cities and Urban Growth Areas/Urban Communities
a The primary role of Krtsap's urban communities is to encourage growth, through new
development, re- development and in -fill (See Appendix B for current and projected
population distribution ) Population Qrowth should be directed to Cities, urban growth areas
and centers with a transportation system that connects people with jobs and housing
b Each of K tsap's urban communities should foster its unique vision as a high quality place to
live and work, through urban design, historic preservation, and arts that improve the natural
and human -made environments, promote healthy h�estyles, contribute to a prosperous
economy, and, increase the region's resdien in adapting to changes or adverse events
c. In Kitsap, urban communities are closely linked to water and natural amenities and provide
open space links to the natural environment.
2. Roles ofKitsapCounty:
a Keep regional vision in mind when making local decisions
b Promote stewardship of unincorporated urban areas and promote
flnaneially viable annexation into cities or incorporation.
c Maintain/enhance natural systems and rural character
d Include a variety of low density rural communities, densities, and uses.
3. To achieve these goals, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council member jurisdictions
should:
a. Make decisions together when needed
b Coordinate and cooperate on land use,— policy capital plannin environmental issues, and
cultural resource management /planning
c Establish and keep updated a Buildable Land Analysis Program.
d. Develop a program for the Transfer of Development Rights to preserve lands with
important public benefits
e. Maintain/preserve distinct urban identities with green breaks or other natural features
f Promote tiering and/or phasing of infrastructure development within Urban Growth Areas
g Develop and implement land use policies, regulations and incentives to promote the
efficient use of urban areas
h Incorporate Provisions addressing community health into appropriate re ig onal
countywide, and local planning and decision - making processes
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
6
AA_ 19 2007
Element B. Urban Growth Areas
The basic premise for designating Urban Growth Areas is to encourage the location of urban density
residential, commercial and industrial developments in areas where services can be most
economically provided The benefits of directing growth to designated urban areas include
* Higher density residential development within walking or bicycli?w distance ofjobs, transit,
schools and parks
* Limiting urban expansion into rural and forested areas
* Promotion of in -fill or redevelopment of existing urban areas
* Preservation of open space, critical areas and lands designated for resource protection
* Accommodation of employment growth in a concentrated pattern
* More economical provision and maintenance of streets, sewer/ water lines and other public
facilities
* Promotion of attractive residential neighborhoods and commercial districts which provide a
sense of community
* A harmonious relationship with regional planning as articulated by Vision 24N
„estiamie Transportation 2040, adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council as the
growth and transportation strategy for central Puget Sound
Policies for Urban Growth Areas (UGA) Background The Growth Management
1. Land Utilization & Monitoring Programs Act was amended in 1997 requiring Kitsap
County and Cities to monitor countywide
Consistent with RCW 36 70A 115, the County and development activities in five -year
Cities shall ensure that, taken collectively, adoption of intervals in order to test their
and amendments to their comprehensive plans and/or Comprehensive Plans' growth and land
development regulations provide sufficient capacity of absorption assumptions Two different
land suitable for development within their jurisdictions analyses are used (1) The Land Capacity
to accommodate their housing and employment growth Analysis, first conducted by Kitsap County
(derived from population distribution), as adopted in in 2002, estimates the existing land supply
the applicable Countywide Planning Policies and based on a set of defined assumptions, e g
consistent with the 20 -year population forecast from th market factor, speed of land absorption, e critical areas exclusions, etc It uses a
WA Office of Financial Management and Vision 2040 consistent, agreed -upon methodology, with
guidance (Implements Multi- County Planning Policy allowance for documented variations for
DP-Action-15) individual jurisdiction's conditions (2)
a The County and the Cities shall maintain a Land The Buildable Land Analysis (as required
Capacity Analysis Program using consistent, by the State GMA) uses recorded permit
agreed -upon methodology to estimate the land activity to track and monitor residential,
supply available to accommodate future residential, commercial, and industrial growth It will
be updated throughout Kitsap County in
commercial, and industrial growth 2007 It is an adaptive management tool for
b The County and the Cities shall participate in an comparing development assumptions,
agreed -upon Buildable Lands Analysis Program to targets, and objectives with actual
monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their development If inconsistencies are found,
the County and Cities must then implement
respective Comprehensive Plans reasonable measures, other than adjusting
c The County and Cities shall establish procedures Urban Growth Areas, that will be taken in
for resolving disputes in collection and analysts of order to comply with the GMA The
Land Capacity data In the event a resolution cannot following countywide planning policies
be achieved, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating relate to this regional program to monitor the buildable land supply for future growth
Recommended to Kitsa as forecasted by the State and distributed
through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council process
Council shall be a forum to review and if possible facilitate any disputes between parties
2. Each jurisdiction is responsible for implementing appropriate reasonable measures
within its jurisdictional boundaries. If the Buildable Lands Analysis shows that a
jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan growth goals are not being met, that jurisdiction shall
consider implementing additional reasonable measures in order to use its designated
urban land more efficiently.
3. Process and criteria for establishing, expanding, and adjusting Urban Growth Areas in
Kitsap County:
a Urban Growth Areas are areas "within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside
of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature" (RCW 36 70A 110(1)) except
under specific circumstances, as fully contained communities and master planned resorts as
authorized by the Growth Management Act
b Unincorporated Urban Growth Areas shall be associated with an existing or future
city
c All Urban Growth Areas shall be reflected in County and respective City comprehensive
plans
d Sufficient area must be included in the Urban Growth Areas to accommodate the adopted
20 -year population distribution as adopted by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
and consistent with WA Office of Financial Management projections.
e A jurisdiction may define growth tiers within its Urban Growth Area (RCW 36 70A 110.3)
to focus public and/or private investment where growth is desired. Utility development
and/or expansion may be phased to support efficient and cost - effective growth and to
prioritize investments
f The County, City, or interested citizens may initiate an amendment to an existing Urban
Growth Area through the comprehensive plan amendment process as authorized by the
Growth Management Act
g Any jurisdiction seeking to expand its Urban Growth Area shall achieve densities and
urban growth patterns consistent with the Growth Management Act and the City's adopted
Comprehensive Plan and any inter -local agreement between the City and the County
h If an adopted or proposed, 20 -year projected population distribution requires the expansion
of its Urban Growth Area, the respective jurisdiction shall conduct planning and analysis,
addressing the following conditions:
i Update and confirm the capacity analysis for land within the existing Urban Growth
Area for residential, commercial, and/or industrial lands, which takes into account all
development approved within the overall UGA since the last UGA expansion This
shall be based upon updated Buildable Land and Land Capacity Analyses that follow
the guidelines of RCW 36 70A 215 or other analysis determined appropriate for the
particular UGA involved To maximize consistency across jurisdictions, each
jurisdiction shall use consistent methodology in calculating capacity
ii Review the planning and zoning regulations and any incentive programs in place to
determine expected densities and urban growth patterns in the existing UGA consistent
with the Growth Management Act and the jurisdiction's adopted Comprehensive Plan
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
8
iii Determine whether the adoption and implementation of suitable reasonable measures
should be considered, if the Buildable Land Analysis shows that its Comprehensive
Plan growth goals are not being met
iv Data collection and analysis for the Land Capacity Analysis should be done
cooperatively The County will be responsible for data describing growth and capacity
in the unincorporated portion of the Urban Growth Area, and the City for the
incorporated portion
i Expansion of Urban Growth Areas shall direct growth first to areas already characterized
by urban growth that have adequate existing public facility and service capabilities to serve
development, second to areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served
adequately by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any
additional needed public facilities and services that are provided, and third to areas that are
adjacent to incorporated cities or established Urban Growth Areas once the available land
meeting the first or second priority has been designated Areas which have existing public
facilities or where public facilities can be reasonably extended and are not currently at
urban densities should be considered first within this category
J Ajunsdiction, as part of its Comprehensive Plan amendment or Subarea Plan process, that
proposes an expansion of the UGA shall prepare or update a comparison of potential areas
for expansion, including
i. Planning and zoning regulations currently in place
ii An evaluation of how a full range of urban-level infrastructure and services would
be provided within potential expansion areas, including appropriate capital facility
analysis
Fire Storm Water Solid Waste
Police Potable Water Park & Recreation Facilities
Transportation Sewer Schools
Utilities Power and Telecommunications, including Broadband
Emergency Medical Services
All service providers including special districts and adjacent jurisdictions should be
included in the evaluation Best available infrastructure technology may be used
provided that it has been approved by the jurisdiction as part of a broader review of
available technology
iii Although specific standards and criteria are not implied, other factors shall be
addressed in evaluating areas for Urban Growth Area expansion, including but not
limited to environmental constraints, economic development; preservation of
cultural, historical, and designated resource lands
k The City and County shall conduct early and continuous public involvement when
establishing, expanding, or adjusting Urban Growth Areas, and shall do so jointly when
appropriate Residents of unincorporated areas should be consulted and actively involved
in the process affecting them
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
9
Arevembep !A, 200
4. Coordinated Growth Management in Urban Growth Areas:
a Adopted City and County comprehensive plans shall reflect the intent that all land within
unincorporated Urban Growth Areas will either annex to a city or incorporate within the
20 -year planning horizon
b To maximize the efficient use of urban lands, subdivisions in Urban Growth Areas shall be
consistent with the associated j unsdiction's Comprehensive Plan and underlying zoning
densities
c As described in the Growth Management Act, cities are the primary provider of municipal
services and facilities in their Urban Growth Areas, responsible for demonstrating within
their Comprehensive Plans the capacity to provide all urban services within their associated
Urban Growth Area(s) This may be accomplished through a collaborative process with
Kitsap County and/or other service providers
d. The County and Cities shall establish procedures to facilitate the smooth transfer of
governance for associated Urban Growth Area(s) through the adoption of Urban Growth
Area Management Agreements (UGAMAs), as per Appendix C Urban Growth Area
Management Agreements
e. For Urban Growth Areas
i The County should plan with associated cities and local communities to address land
uses, infrastructure needs, level of service standards as identified in these policies,
and other issues as needed The results should be reflected in the County
Comprehensive Plan
ii. The County should esentinue-to provide a level of urban facilities and services
consistent with the County's abih& and appropriateness to provide such services
generally eqwvalen4 to these efesittes on an inter-ifn basis for those Urban Growth
Areas that will be associated with a specific city or that will eventually incorporate
5. Distribution of 20 year population increments, as forecasted by the WA Office of
Financial Management:
a. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall coordinate the process for distributing the
forecasted population for the period 2005 — 2025 and every five years thereafter, consistent
with the requirements of the Growth Management Act Kitsap County shall adopt any
revision to the population distribution as part of its next Comprehensive Plan amendment
process and the Cities shall base their Comprehensive Plan amendments upon that
distribution The distribution process should consider countywide demographic analysis,
the Land Capacity Analysis, and the OFM projections and it shall promote a countywide
development pattern targeting over three quarters (76 %) of new population growth to the
designated Urban Growth Areas The County and the Cities recognize that the success of
this development pattern requires not only the rigorous support of Kitsap County in the
rural areas, but also Cities' Comprehensive Plans being designed to attract substantial new
population growth
Population distribution will be reviewed through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
process every five years The review will include an analysis of the Cities' and County's
progress in achieving target distributions If the 76% UGA target mentioned above for new
population growth and the overall population targets are met or exceeded, the target for
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
10 �4depted by Kamp County Ordmame 403 2007
A49vember 19 200
new population will revert to five sixths (83 %), as per the revised County -wide Planning
Policies adopted by Kitsap County Ordinance #258 -01 on August 20, 2001 Otherwise, the
target may be reaffirmed or explicitly modified
b Each j unsdiction with a designated Urban Growth Area shall develop an estimate and/or
range of the additional population that it could accommodate and service during the 20 year
planning horizon, consistent with its vision for future community character The estimate
shall consider the need for increasing population density within the Urban Growth Areas to
promote efficient service delivery, avoid sprawl, and preserve community character
c The population estimates and/or ranges shall be provided to the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council, with a statement of need concerning adjusted Urban Growth Area
boundaries
d The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall compile the jurisdictions' population
estimates, including the estimate of additional population capacity for areas outside the
Urban Growth Areas, and determine whether adjustments to the overall distribution are
required in order to fit within the OFM protected range
e The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, after conducting a public hearing, shall
recommend the estimate and/or ranges of 20 year population distribution to Kitsap County
for adoption as an amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies
f Kitsap County should give substantial weight to the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council's recommendation in adopting the 20 -year population distribution
g. Following adoption of the estimates and/or ranges, each jurisdiction should update its
comprehensive plan, so as to arrive at a final population target consistent with the estimate
and/or within the original range
h. After each _junsdiction has completed its comprehensive plan update, the final adopted
target should be compiled and reviewed through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
process and the revised population distribution incorporated into the Countywide Planning
Policies A final distribution to Urban Growth Areas versus non -Urban Growth Areas
within the range specified above should then be calculated.
jobs, 6. Fully Contained Communities and Mastep Planned ReseAs
UndeF The growth Management Ae4 WW 36:70A 350),
eeFapr-eheasi plea, most r-efleet the F-C-C, T_ he- Q_N4A mquir-es that FGC=s provide fer- a faoi e
housing,
following
_.et limited to p r aFks,
should be pr-evided within er. along Feso s (MoPR's) outside of Uribm Gre%4h Areas ferr
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
Afevember !A, :200
> and third faltigated,
6. Policies for Growth Outside of Urban Growth Areas: Fully Contained Communities,
National Historic Towns, and Master Planned Resorts
a A Master Plan review process and Under the Growth Management Act (RCW 36 70A 350),
decision criteria for fully contained fully contained communities (FCCs) may be considered,
communities, national historic provided that a portion of the twenty -year population
towns, and master planned resorts forecast is reserved for & subsequently distributed to the
should be incorporated in the FCC The GMA requires that FCCs provide for a mix of
County's comprehensive plan, uses that would provide,lobs, housing, & public facilities
must reflect the standards and and services to support a long -term residential population
requirements in the GMA and to The GMA (RCW 36 70A 360) also allows the consideration
addition must address the of proposed master planned resorts (MPR's) outside of
f ollowing Urban Growth Areas for shorter -term residential uses
Master planned resorts are described as self - contained, fully
i Provision ofnecessga public integrated planned developments in areas with significant
facilities, including but not natural amenities
limited to parks, schools, and
public safety facilities should be The GMA allows for areas with a federal landmark
provided within or along with designation to be developed as National Historic Towns
the development, consistent (RCW 36 70A 520) The designation may allow urban
services in rural areas dependent upon historic development
with adopted capital facility pattern Its boundaries and land uses must be consistent
and level of service standards, with those over the course of its history, but not specific to
u Future assessment ofadverse anV point in time
impacts to public infrastructure. Vision 2040 policies state that new FCC's are to be avoided
nearby communities, adiacent
rural areas, environmental
resources, and designated resource lands Such impacts should first be avoided, second
minimized, and third mitigated,
in Provisions for review ofsuch developments through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council process, in addition to other procedural requirements
b Consistent with guidance provided in VISION 2040, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council shall avoid the establishment o a Fully Contained Community (FCC) Only if it is
found necessary to accommodate future urban population growth may the Krtsap Regional
Coordinating Council recommend the creation of an FCC and a corresponding new
community reserve population Any such designation shall be fully consistent with all
Countywide Planning Policies establishing new Urban Growth Areas (Elements B3 and B5)
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
1 :2007
and RCW 36 70A 350(2), which, in part requires that a new community reserve population
be established no more than once every five years as a part ofthe designation or review of
Urban Growth Areas and that the Urban Growth Areas shall be accordingly offset
In addition, the following shall be included in any County Comprehensive Plan
requirements -governing FCCs
i a phasing plan that monitors and requires concurrent development of commercial and
employment uses with residential development, to insure that the community is fully
contained,
it a mechanism to insure that the timing of the development components will be fully
regulated by the phasing plan,
in a substantial public benefit
c As Vision 2040 requires comprehensive review and consideration of the regional impacts of
any proposed Fully Contained Community the County shall forward the proposal to
ad scent counties, the Puget Sound Regional Council, and the Krtsap Regional
Coordinating Council for review at the earliest possible point in the process The Krtsap
Regional Coordinating Council shall review the proposal for regional impacts to the
f ollowin g
i the regional growth strategy as included in Vision 2040,
ii the split in population growth between the countywide urban and rural areas
in other elements o the Countywide Planning Policies
Recommended to Krtsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
13 OpAnanee V3 200
Alevember- 19 200
Element C: Centers of Growth
Centers are intended to be compact and centralized working, shopping and/or activity areas linked
to other Centers by transit and non - motorized facilities [See H Transportation 5-67 Centers and
their boundaries are intended to be locally determined by the County and the Cities where a
community-wide focal point can be provided, significant population and/or employment growth
can be located, and the increased use of transit, walking and bicycling can be supported
Designated Centers are intended to define the pattern of future residential and
commercial /industrial growth and incorporate opportunities for parks, civic, and public space
development in Kitsap County (See Appendix F for listing of Kitsap Designated Centers )
Policies for Centers of Growth (C):
1. In decisions relating to population growth
and resource allocation supporting The Puget Sound Regional Council has
growth, Centers have a high priority. defined several types of Regional
within Urban Growth Areas in the four -county
2. The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies planning region, with planning guidelines
encourage the development of Centers (Vision 2040) Appe 1)
according to the following typology
a. Regional r'°�Aer-s e = Growth Centers
i Metropolitan Centers
"Metmpelitm Centers function as anchors within the region for a high density mix of
business, residential, public, cultural and recreational uses, and day and night activity
They are characterized by their historic role as the central business districts of the major
cities within the central Puget Sound region, providing services for and easily
accessible to a population well beyond their city limits. Metro Centers may also serve
national or international roles " (Vision 2040)
ii Urban Centers Silverdale Urban Cie - in Kitsap eufA y, U fbaa CefteFss are areas with
the comprehensive planning to support a wide range of commercial, housing, and
cultural choices All areas of the Urban Center are serviced by transit throughout the
day and much of the area is within walking or bicycling distance Significant in -fill
opportunities exist with the highest residential, commercial, and employment densities
expected (Vision 2040)
b Regional Manufactunng/Industnal Centers South Kitsap ladastFial Afea "
are mayor, existing regional employment areas of
intensive, concentrated manufacturing and industrial land uses which cannot be easily
mixed at higher densities with other incompatible uses To preserve and maximize land at
these centers for manufacturing, industry and related uses, large retail uses or non - related
offices are discouraged. Provision of adequate public facilities and services, including
good access to the region's transportation system, is very important to the success of
manufacturing /industrial centers " (Vision 2040)
3 c. The following are other types of centers within Kitsap County
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
14
Xqwmber- 19,200
i Town or City Centers are usually the existing downtown core of a city or Urban
Growth Area There is an abundant mix of shopping, service, employment, and cultural
opportunities Multifamily housing may be intermixed and single family housing may
be within walking or bicycling distance Infill should include mixed use and higher
densities surrounding the Town Center
n Mixed Use Centers are a generic category that can be described in terms of
neighborhoods or districts within a city or Urban Growth Area The designation
represents a commitment to planning for Center development, with a planned mix of
housing, commercial, service, and employment opportunities Most shopping and
commercial uses are within a short walking or bicycling distance of housing There is a
higher proportion of multi - family housing at relatively high densities Navy facilities
could be considered for this designation
in Activity and Employment Centers are areas of concentrated employment and are a
magnet for significant numbers of people usually during daytime hours because of
business and/or manufacturing activities They may be located outside of Urban
Growth Areas, consistent with the Growth Management Act Industrial and business
parks and Navy employment centers are in this category Within Urban Growth Areas,
the opportunity to include a proportional residential element should be determined on a
case -by -case basis, considering the unique geography and economics of the area
iv Transportation Hubs are locations of regional inter -modal connection that may be
located outside of Urban Growth Areas. Examples are ferry terminals, the Bremerton
National Airport, or certain transit stations
3. Recognizing that communities evolve over time, a iurisdiction may request of the %it
Regional Coordinating Council an initial designation or a change in Center status This
request shall be considered and a decision made during the next Countywide Planning
Policies amendment cycle. A change in Center status may require action by the Puget Sound
Regional Council
4. ,
lQtsep Regional Coordinating . In addition to meeting the applicable criteria above,
a request for Center designation or a change in Center status should address the following
(See Appendix G)
Living wage is the minimum hourly wave
a. Current or programmed transportation needed by a sole provider working full time
resources (including roads, ferries, (2080 hours per year) to cover the costs o
transit, airports, bicycle, pedestrian) food, shelter, clothing and other basic
b Balance of living wave employment necessities for their family The assumption
opportunities with residential is that living wages vary across
c. Proximity and connectivity among jobs, communities, based on differences to the
housing, retail services cost of Irving and size of household
d Types and density of residential uses [Sources Economic Policy Institute &KEDA7
e. Inclusion of affordable housing
f Provision of community gathering Living Wage. Living Wage Calculator for
space, parks, and cultural opportunities Kitsap County, Pennsylvania State Unrversa
g Impacts to ecological functions. htta / /www livmgwage geog psu edu/
Minimum Ware, WA State Dent of Labor
& Industries http //www lm wa gov/
Recomme4ded to Kasap Countv bv KRCC Board May 24 20 1
15
Element D: Rural Land Uses and Development Patterns
Rural areas of Kitsap County are characterized as having a variety of parcel sizes, with a diversity
of land use activities These areas also contain significant amounts of complex natural systems It
is a high priority to preserve and enhance the rural character of these areas Counties are
responsible for designating and regulating rural areas through the comprehensive planning process
However, rural preservation is a regional issue and it is important to coordinate these planning
objectives with the Cities
Policies for Rural Land Uses and Development Patterns (R):
1. Preserving rural character and enhancing the natural environment.
a Preserve the character of identified rural areas by protecting and enhancing the natural
environment, open spaces, and- recreational opportunities, and scenic and historic areas
Support supper small scale farming and working resource land, promote locally grown
ood and- forestry eco- and heritage - tourism Support -ap�g low- density
residential living and cluster development maintained by FuFal lev°i of se_, ie�peFt
that provides for a mix of housing types, rural levels of
service, cultural activities, and employment that services the needs of rural areas at a size
and scale that is compatible with long -term character, productivity ,and use ofthese lands
b This policy is not intended to preclude the future designation of Urban Growth Areas
2. Preserving rural land use and development patterns:
a Rural Communities are already - existing residential and commercial areas of more
intensive rural development designated in the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan under
RCW 36 70A 070 5 In -fill is expected Rural Communities should be serviced by
transportation providers and other services consistent with the Levels of Service adopted by
Kitsap County for roads and by Kitsap Transit for transit upon their designation as an area
of more intensive rural development
b. Transportation Hubs may be located within existing areas of more intensive
development Walking, bicycling, and transit are the mayor forms of travel. Transportation
Hubs are locations of regional mtermodal connection. Examples are ferry terminals and
transit stations with convenience services
c The County shall develop criteria consistent with the Growth Management Act for
designating future industrial and commercial development outside of Urban Growth Areas
that protect rural character while encouraging vehicle trip reduction The criteria should
allow for industrial resource -based land use and recreation and for convenience commercial
that is scaled to serve the daily needs of rural residents
3. Establishing and maintaining rural levels of service:
a Rural level -of- service standards shall address sewage disposal, water, transportation and
other appropriate services The standards shall be developed based upon levels of service
typically delivered in rural areas consistent with RCW 36.70A 030 (16)
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
16
Alevember 19, 200
b For purpose of trip reduction, develop a range of alternative modes of transportation
consistent with rural levels of service to connect Rural Communities with urban Centers
c When sewers need to be extended to solve isolated health, environmental, and sanitation
problems, they shall be designed for limited access so as not to increase the development
potential of the surrounding rural area
4. Conserving small -scale natural resource use in rural areas:
a Rural land use designations in the County's Comprehensive Plan she shall recognize
ecological functions and support rural uses such as farming, forestry, mining, recreation, and
other rural activities, and permit a variety of low- density residential uses which preserve rural
character and ecolo -wcal functions and can be sustained by rural service levels
b The County's Comprehensive Plan policies shall promote clustering residential development
and other techniques to protect and enhance significant open spaces, natural resources,
cultural resources, and critical areas for more effieienre ective use of the land Clustering
should not increase residential housing units in the overall area designated as rural, consistent
with designated rural densities. Development clusters shall be designed, scaled and sited in a
manner consistent with rural character and the provision of rural levels of service
c The County's Comprehensive Plan policies shall support Rural Communities as locations of
employment, a mix of housing types, and cultural activities for rural areas that primarily
function as locations for service needs such as grocery stores, shopping, and community
services, and small -scale cottage industries for the surrounding rural area
Recommended to Kasap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
17 X 2 007
Element E. Countywide Strategies for Open Space Preservation, Resource Preservation,
nod Critical Areas, Air Quality, and Water Quality /Quantity
Open space is defined as land area consisting of natural systems, resource lands and critical areas
that include building limitations for future development These critical areas include wetlands,
wildlife conservation areas, steep slopes, frequently flooded areas and areas with a critical
recharging affect These open space lands also include aesthetic functions such as view sheds of
the water or ndgelines Many of these natural systems are inter- connected and cross multi -
junsdictional boundaries within the County The strategy is to conserve these areas and connect
them to create a regional open space network to protect critical areas, conserve natural resources,
and preserve lands and resources of countywide and local significance The purpose of these
strategies is to enhance the quality_ of countywide water, soil, and air resources and, potentially,
climate
Policies for Open Space Preservation, Resource Protection, a" Critical Areas, Air, and
Water Quality /Quantity (PPCAA M
1 Creating a regional network of open space:
a The County and the Cities shall implement the Kitsap County Open Space Plan and the
Kitsap County Consolidated Greenway Plan which identify a countywide green space
strategy that incorporates planning efforts of the County, Cities, state agencies, non - profit
interest groups and land trusts in the County
b The County and the Cities shall preserve and enhance, through inter- lunsdictional
planning, significant networks and linkages of open space, regional parks and
public /private recreation areas, wildlife habitats, critical areas and resource lands; historic
and cultural landscapes, water bodies and trails
c The County and the Cities shall frame and separate urban areas by creating and preserving
a permanent network of urban and rural open space, including parks, recreation areas,
critical areas and resource lands
2. Conserving and enhancing the County's natural resources, critical areas, water
quality /quantity and environmental amenities while planning for and accommodating
sustainable growth:
quality pfete.
b-a The County and the Cities shall protect critical areas (wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, fish
and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, steep slopes, and
geologically hazardous areas) and should consider other environmental amenities such as
view corridors, canopy cover, and ridgelines
e.b The County and the Cities shall establish and implement Best Management Practices to
protect the long -term integrity of the natural environment, adjacent land use, and the
productivity of resource lands.
d.c. The County and the Cities shall establish procedures to preserve significant historic, visual
and cultural resources including views, landmarks, archaeological sites, and areas of special
locational character
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
18 r�,.......x 19 007
e d The County and the Cities shall encourage the use of environmentally sensitive
development practices to minimize the impacts of growth on the County's natural resource
systems
e The County and the Cities shall protect and enhance the public health and safety and the
environment for all residents, regardless ofsocial or economic status, by reducing
pollutants, as defined by WA State and federal law
f The County and the Cities shall work together to identify, protect, and restore networks of
natural habitat areas and functions that cross junsdictional boundaries
g The County and Cities shall protect and enhance ecosystems that support Washington State's
Priority Habitat and Species as identified by the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife
3. Protection of air quality is accomplished by reducing the levels of toxins, tine Particles, and
greenhouse gases released into the environment, especially through transportation activities.
a The County and Cities, in their respective comprehensive plans, should include specific
goals and policies to enhance air quality by reducing the release of toxins, fine Particles
and greenhouse gases
b The County and Cities should adopt and implement purchasingpohcigs/proQrams for
vehicles /equipment that use clean efficient fuels
4. Protection of water quality and quantity is accomplished by reducing the amount of toxins
and pathogens in our water supply.
a The County and Cities should adopt policies in their Comprehensive Plans to reflect that
surface and storm water and aquifer recharge areas should be treated as a resource
b The County and Cities should continue to be models for low impact development and
implement such programs whenever practical
c The County and Cities should develop and implement a program, as funding allows and
where feasible, to retrofit infrastructure that was developed prior to the implementation of
best practices in surface and storm water management programs
; S.Listed species recovery under the Endangered Species Act (ESA):
a The County and the Cities shall preserve, protect, and where possible, restore the functions
of natural habitat to support ESA - listed species, through the adoption of comprehensive
plan policies, critical area ordinances, shoreline master programs and other development
regulations that seek to protect, maintain or restore aquatic ecosystems associated habitats
and aquifer through the use of management zones, development regulations, incentives for
voluntary efforts of private landowners and developers, land use classifications or
designations, habitat acquisition programs or habitat restoration projects
b. The County and the Cities shall provide incentive -based non - regulatory protection efforts
such as acquisition of priority habitats through fee - simple and conservation easements from
willing sellers
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
19 Adepled by Ki&qp County OrWinanee 403 2007
Arevember 19L, 200
c The County and the Cities shall jointly establish and implement monitoring and evaluation
program to determine the effectiveness of restoration, enhancement, and recovery strategies
for salmon including ESA - listed species Each jurisdiction shall apply an adaptive
management strategy to determine how well the objectives of listed species recovery and
critical habitat preservation/restoration are being achieved
4. 6 Coordination of watershed and land use planning:
a The County and the Cities shall participate in a planning program that determines changes
in stream hydrology and water quality under different land use scenarios at full build -out of
designated land use classifications
b The County and the Cities shall coordinate land use planning using watersheds or natural
drainage basins to implement strategies for restoration of aquatic habitat and to reduce
impacts to other natural systems and participate in efforts to improve the health of our
waterways
c Kitsap County shall coordinate and maintain a regional database of best available science
for the purpose of modifying Critical Areas Ordinances, if funding is available
d Upon adoption of a state classification system, the Cities and the County shall establish a
single system for stream typing
Recommended to Kusap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
Arevember X, 200
Element F. Contiguous, Compatible, and Orderly Development
Upon designation of Urban Growth Areas, the County and Cities will need to develop consistent
implementation measures to ensure that development occurs in an orderly and contiguous manner
The intent of the following countywide planning policies is to minimize differences in urban
development regulations and standards between the County and the Cities and to facilitate the
economical provision of urban services to development
Policies for Contiguous, Compatible ,and Orderly Development (CCOD):
1. Encouragement of cooperative inter - jurisdictional planning by federal, tribal, state, local,
and special purpose government:
a Inter jurisdictional discussion, information exchange, and coordination of proposals shall
be initiated as early and expeditiously as possible by the responsible agencies, to aid in the
smooth transition of zovernance
b Initial inventories and analyses of utilities and public services information are critical to the
planning process and shall be made available as early and expeditiously as possible by the
responsible agencies
c The Kttsap Regional Coordinating Council may establish or designate on -going technical
committee(s) comprised of representatives from utilities and service providers to
investigate long -range regional needs for various facilities and services, including but not
limited to those for transportation, sewer and storm drainage, availability and delivery of
potable water, solid waste, broadband, parks and recreation, and open space
d The Countywide Planning Policies will further the implementation of Vision 2-020
DestiflaUen Transportation 2040 as adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council
2. Inter- regional coordination of land use and transportation, environmental, and
infrastructure planning:
a The County and the Cities shall participate in the Puget Sound Regional Council and the
Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization
b Locally - generated data shall be provided to the Puget Sound Regional Council and the
Peninsula Regional Transportation Planting Organization for use in their coordination of
population forecasts, land use, and transportation
c The planning proposals of these regional organizations shall be monitored and adjustments
recommended to insure that they accurately reflect local needs and plans
d RecogLnze and work with corridors that cross jurisdictional boundaries 6ncluding natural
systems, and transportation and infrastructure systems) to commumtE planning,
development, and design
3. Fiscal equity:
a It i recognized that fiscal disparities exist as a result of growth and changes to municipal
s g p g g p
boundaries The Kttsap Regional Coordinating Council shall monitor the Revenue Sharing
Inter -local Agreement among the County and Cities (shown as Appendix D) and seek
additional ways to address fiscal disparities as they relate to promoting coordinated
development and the implementation of the Growth Management Act
Recommended to Kttsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
21
Nevmber 19, 200
b The County and the Cities shall work together to insure that all fees associated with
development approval are based upon the real cost of service and act to encourage
development within designated Urban Growth Areas
c The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall facilitate on -going regional discussion on
revenue equity issues
4. Community design and development: Strategies should Promote orderly development that
reflects the unique character ofa community and encourages healthy lifestyles through
building and site design and transportation connectivity In addition, sustainable economic and
environmental development techniques should be utilized to enhance the quality oflife
a Utilize design strategies to ensure that changes in the built environment provide
continuous and orderly development
b Encourage development that reflects unique local qualities and provides an economic
benefit to the community_
c Design mixed use developments and local street patterns to improve the environment for
overall mobility and accessibility to and within the development through multi -modal
transportation options that serve all users
d Design oftransportation networks should fat within the context of the built and natural
environment, enhancing the communyl connectivity, and physical activity in the area
community wide and specifically in designated growth centers and high transit areas
e Design schools, institutions and pubhcfacilities to be compatible with the surrounding
community character and needs
f Use sustainable building techniques (such as rehabihtation/re -use, LEED (Leadership in
Energy & Environmental Desj07, Low Impact Development, eneW -e icient fixtures, etc )
in the design and development of the built environment
g Support urban design, historic preservation, and arts to enhance quality_ofhfe
h Promote solar, wind, tidal, wave generation, and other renewable energy generation where
g ropriate to serve the community
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
22
Element G. Siting Public Capital Facilities of a Countywide or- Statewide No
The Growth Management Act requires local governments to inventory existing capital facilities
owned by public entities, to identify locations and to determine capacities to meet future demand
for growth without decreasing levels of service The Washington State Office of Financial
Management is responsible for identifying and maintaining a list of essential state public facilities
that are required or likely to be built within the next six years as required by the Growth
Management Act Counties and cities are also required to coordinate the siting of countywide and
statewide capital facilities to mitigate potential adverse impacts from the location and development
of these facilities
Policies for Siting Public Capital Facilities (CF):
1. Identification of needed capital facilities:
a The County and the Cities shall each inventory their existing capital facilities and identify
needed facility expansion and construction and provide that data to the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council
b The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall develop and maintain a list of public
capital facilities needed to serve Kitsap County as a whole, based upon the County and
Cities' Comprehensive Plans, the Countywide Coordinated Water System Plan, and other
appropriate system plans These include, but are not limited to, solid and hazardous waste
handling facilities and disposal sites, water and wastewater treatment facilities, regional
water supply inter -tie facilities,- Fegional- education institutions, airports, local correctional
facilities, in- patient facilities including hospitals and regional park and recreation facilities,
and government buildings that serve Kitsap County as a whole, including those essential
public facilities as defined in RCW 36.70A 200
2. Location of capital and Public facilities
a I the primary population served by the faghty is urban, the facility should be located in a
City or Urban Growth Area where feasible
& 3. Establishing a process and review criteria for the siting of facilities that are of a
countywide or statewide nature:
a When essential public facility as defined in RCW 36 70A 200 is proposed in Kitsap
County, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall appoint a Facility Analysis and
Site Evaluation Advisory Committee composed of citizen members selected by the member
jurisdictions to represent a broad range of interest groups to evaluate proposed public
facility siting At a minimum this evaluation shall consider -
i. The impacts created by existing facilities;
ii The potential for reshaping the economy, the environment and community character,
in The development of specific siting cnteria for the proposed project, giving priority
consideration to siting within Designated Centers;
iv The identification, analysis and ranking of potential project sites,
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
23 y Qp&nanee $03 2007
Afevember 19,200
v Measures to first minimize and second mitigate potential physical impacts including,
but not limited to, those relating to land use, transportation, utilities, noise, odor and
public safety,
vi Measures to first minimize and second mitigate potential fiscal impacts
b Certain public capital facilities such as schools and libraries that generate substantial travel
demand should be located first in Designated Centers or, if not feasible to do so, along or
near major transportation corridors and public transportation routes
c Some public capital facilities, such as those for waste handling, may be more appropriately
located outside of Urban Growth Areas due to exceptional bulk or potentially dangerous or
objectionable characteristics Public facilities located beyond Urban Growth Areas should
be self - contained or be served by urban governmental services in a manner that will not
promote sprawl Utility and service considerations must be incorporated into site planning
and development
d Uses shall adhere to local health district or state agency rules regarding commercial and
industrial use of on -site sewage systems.
e The multiple use of corridors for mayor utilities, trails and transportation rights -of -way is
encouraged
f. County and City comprehensive plans and development regulations shall not preclude the
siting of essential public facilities
g Public facilities shall not be located in designated resource lands, critical areas, or other
areas where the siting of such facilities would be incompatible
X 4.Air transportation facilities in Kitsap County:
a The Counties and the Cities shall recognize the importance of airports as essential public
facilities and the preservation of access to the air transportation system
b The County and the Cities shall ensure the safety of the community and airport users
through compatible land use planning adjacent to airports and coordination of the airport
with ground access Examples would include not encouraging or supporting higher
residential densities, schools, or hospitals near airports or airport approach corridors
c. The County and the Cities shall plan for heliports throughout Kitsap County for emergency
use
Recommended to Kasap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
24 �nn7
t
Element H. Transportation
The Growth Management Act requires that transportation planning be coordinated among local
and state jurisdictions The Growth Management Act further requires that transportation planning
be coordinated with the land use elements of local comprehensive plans Coordination of land use
and transportation plans will allow Kitsap County and the Kitsap Cities to meet three inter- related
transportation goals
• Serve Designated Centers to reduce sprawl, conserve land and make more efficient use of
infrastructure,
• Preserve the natural environment, including water quality and, potentially, climate
• Provide a balanced system for the efficient, clean, safe movement of people, goods and
services among Designated Centers within Kitsap County and the larger Puget Sound
region
The intent of the following policies is to define appropriate methods and strategies to achieve these
goals through inter - regional and mtra- regional coordination among transportation and land use
planning agencies
For the purpose of this Policy, the following transportation facilities are of countywide
significance
a state and federal highways,
b major artenals,
c public transit facilities and services,
d non - motorized facilities connecting designated centers,
e marine transportation facilities (ferries, shipping),
f airports and heliports (passenger and/or freight),
g rail facilities (passenger and/or freight)
The following facilities and system components should be included in the multi -modal network
a roads, including mayor lughways, arterials and collectors,
b public transit, including bus, rail, and park & ride lots,
c non - motonzed facilities,
d vehicle and public or private passenger only ferries,
e airports,
f parking facilities that support the multi -modal network,
g facilities related to transportation demand management,
h intelligent transportation systems (ITS)
Policies for Transportation (T):
1. Strategies to optimize and manage the sae use of transportation facilities and services:
a The County and the Cities shall each emphasize the maintenance and preservation of their
existing transportation network.
b Through the regular update of the Transportation Element of their Comprehensive Plan,
the County and the Cities should each identify Level of Service (LOS) and prioritize
operational and safety deficiencies, with the goal ofsubstantially reducing deaths and
serious injuries
Recommended to Kusap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
Alevember 19, 200
c The County and the Cities should utilize Transportation System Management strategies
such as parking restrictions, traffic signal coordination, transit queue jumps (traffic signal
modification equipment that allows busses to move ahead of other vehicles), ramp
metering, striping non - motorized transportation facilities, traffic calming devices, and real
time sensor adjustments for traffic signals
d The County and the Cities should develop and implement access management regulations
that provide standards for driveway spacing and delineation, and encourage the point use of
access points where practical
e The County and the Cities shall actively seek opportunities to share facilities, expertise,
and transportation resources, such as multiple use park& ride /parking lots or shared traffic
signal maintenance responsibility
2. Reducing the rate of growth in auto The State of Washington has taken steps to reduce
traffic, including the number of vehicle greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles
trips, the number of miles traveled, and traveled Not only does reducing the overall amount
the length of vehicle trips taken, for both of travel produce benefits for improving air quality
commute and non - commute trips: and curbing emissions related to climate change, it
also lessens traffic congestion Developing a
a The County and the Cities shall provide transportation system that provides more
both infra- structure and policy opportunities for walking, bicycling, or using transit
incentives to increase the use of non- also creates more choices and options for people
SOV modes of travel
The WA State Dept of Transportation and
i The range of infrastructure Vision 2040 policies identify telework (or tele-
incentives to encourage the use of commuting) as a viable transportation alternative
non modes of travel could The WSDOT- funded 2008 Krtsap Teeework Pilot
incluude de the following Protect noted the particular importance of telework
• Provide public transit, including to rural areas, where citizens tend to drive rimer
preferential treatments for distances
transit, such as queue by -pass
lanes (dedicated bus lanes that allow for transit queue jumps), traffic signal
modifications, and safe, transit stops
• Provide integrated transfer points to facilitate seamless trips between transit and
other modes of travel, particularly at ferry terminals, including park & ride lots,bike
storage facilities, carpool /vanpool and transit advantages to ease ingress /egress,
with proximity to actual connection points, and innovative transit - onented
development
• Provide non - recreational bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including safe
neighborhood walking and biking routes to school
• During the development of all state, county, and city highway capacity
improvement projects, consider the market for non -SOV travel, and the addition of
High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes, park & ride lots, appropriate infrastructure
for both bicycling and walking
n The range of policy incentives to encourage the use of non -SOV modes of travel could
include the following
Recommended to Krtsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
26
Arevember 19, 2007
• Increased emphasis on the Commute Trip Reduction Program already in place
(including ridesharmg incentives), with Kitsap Transit designated as the lead
agency, including program promotion and monitoring
• Managed parking demand at ferry terminals, employment, and retail centers to
discourage SOV use through privileged parking for HOV users, fee structure and
parking space allocations
• Encouraging telecommuting and home -based businesses as a viable work
alternative
• Encouraging the shift of work and non -work trips to off -peak travel hours
• Congestion pricing
• Auto - restricted zones
• Promotion of driver awareness through educational efforts
d-b The County and the Cities shall develop standards or VISION 2040 and Transportation
Complete Streets that address bicycle and 2040 emphasize Complete Streets,
pedestrian facilities for development of new streets and which ensure that transportation
reconstruction of existing streets in Designated Gentefs facilities serve all users and all
s appropriate, consistent with ages and abilities By designing
State law and operating Complete Streets,
e-c In Designated Centers, the jurisdictions should complete local jurisdictions provide
missing vehicular and non - motonzed links between key pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists,
and transit riders with safer travel
arterials to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle and can avoid expensive retrofits,
facilities, without compromising safety standards encourage physical activity and
f-d The County and the Cities shall sheWd develop help create walkable communities
seems bicycle and pedestrian systems plans, which There is no singular design
should be coordinated eensistea across jurisdictional prescription for Complete Streets,
boundaries with particular consideration to providing each one is unique and responds to
safe routes for children to walk and to bike to school its community context
g-e Kitsap Transit shall review and comment on eases ef substafitial residential,
evelopment pLoRosals where gRpropriate
to facilitate convenient use and operation
of appropriate transit services.
3. Environmental impacts of transportation policies:
a Transportation improvements shall be located and constructed so as to discourage /minimize
adverse impacts on water quality and other environmental features
b The County, the Cities, and Kitsap Transit shall consider programming capital
improvements and transportation facilities that alleviate and mitigate impacts of id use on
air quality greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption, such as high - occupancy
vehicle lanes, public transit, vanpool/ carpool facilities, electric and other low emission
Recommended to Kasap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
27 Ade b Kmm Gemm 19 2007
vehicles including buses, bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are designed for functional
transportation
c The County and the Cities shall ensure environmental protection, water quality, and
conformance with ESA requirements through best management practices throughout the
life of the transportation facilities, including
i Facility design, and in particular low impact development strategies for the collection
and treatment of storm water and surface run -off
ii Avoiding construction during the rainy season
in Regular and routine maintenance of systems
d The County, the Cities, and Kitsap Transit should support Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
public education about anti - pollution measures
4. Recognizing that the County and the Cities each encompass a range of development and
density patterns, each jurisdiction shall designate its Centers consistent with the criteria
set forth in Element C of the Countywide Planning Policies. The following policies relate
to planning guidelines to support transit and pedestrian travel appropriate to each type
of urban and rural development or re- development:
a The County and the Cities shall each prepare development strategies for their Designated
Centers that encourage focused mixed use development and mixed type housing to achieve
densities and development patterns that support multi -modal transportation
b In Urban Growth Areas, comprehensive plans should promote pedestrian- and transit -
oriented development that includes access to alternative transportation and, in the interest
of safety and convenience, includes features, such as lighting, pedestrian buffers,
sidewalks, and access enhancements for physically challenged individuals
c Rural Communities outside Urban growth Areas shall accommodate appropriate
pedestnan/bicycle connections and transit service and facilities consistent with rural levels
of service in order to minimize vehicle trips
5. Transportation linkages between designated local and regional Centers:
a Regional corridors shall be designated for automobile, freight, transit, HOV facilities, rail,
marine, bicycle, and pedestrian travel between centers as part of the countywide
transportation plan
b The transportation system linking Designated Centers within the county shall be transit -
oriented and pedestrian and bicycle friendly
6. Freight transportation:
a Preferred routes for the movement of freight shall be identified as part of the countywide
transportation plan
b The County and the Cities shall work to ensure that compatible land uses are applied along
designated freight corridors, including, but not limited to, corridors for air, rail, road and
marine traffic
Recommended to Kusap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
28 pied by Kimap Geunty Ordmanee 03:2007
November 19 200
c The County and the Cities shall use appropriate roadway standards for designated freight
corridors
7. Transportation relationships with the Puget Sound Regional Council and the Peninsula
Regional Transportation Planning Organization:
a. The Countywide Planning Policies )- should support
TfmspeAmien 2034-adopted regional and state plans and policies. As ad opted -1 the
Puget Sound Regienal Geoneil
b The County and the Cities shall actively participate in the Puget Sound Regional Council
and the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO) to assure that
transportation planning in the two regions is consistent and accurately reflects local needs
related to identified regional system components
c The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall serve as the point of coordination to assure
Puget Sound Regional Council and Peninsula RTPO planning programs are consistent and
mutually beneficial to jurisdictions within Kitsap County
d The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Kitsap County shall continue to be a part
of the regional TIP adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council. Local review, comment
and recommendations shall be coordinated through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
8. Identification of needed transportation related facilities and services within Kitsap
County:
a The Puget Sound Regional Council and the Peninsula RTPO shall identify regional system
components and related improvements within Kitsap County with the concurrence of the
Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council.
b A countywide transportation plan developed by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
shall be prepared pursuant to the Growth Management Act to identify countywide
transportation facility and service needs A technical committee including transit and local,
regional, and state transportation providers shall be used in this process
9. Coordination of intra - county transportation planning efforts:
a The Puget Sound Regional Council reviews Cities' and the County's Comprehensive plans
for consistency of land use and transportation elements
b The County and the Cities shall address compatibility between land use and transportation
facilities by
i Not using new road improvements to justify land use intensification
it Managing access on new transportation facilities outside Urban Growth Areas
tit. Allowing phased development of improvements including acquiring right of way
iv Using comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure that development
does not create demands exceeding the capacity of the transportation system, such as*
density limits in areas outside of Urban Growth Areas, concurrency management and
adequate public facility regulation, integrated multi -modal and non - motonzed
networks
c. The County and the Cities shall work together in a coordinated, iterative process to
periodically reassess whether regional land use and transportation goals can realistically be
Recommended to Kusap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
29
met If transportation adequacy and concurrency cannot be met, the following actions
should be considered
i Adjust land use and/or level of service (LOS) standards and consider adopting multi -
modal solutions
ii Make full use of all feasible local option transportation revenues authorized but not yet
implemented
in Work with Washington State Department of Transportation (including Washington
State Ferries), Kitsap Transit, and the private sector to seek additional State
transportation revenues, state and federal grants for infrastructure improvements, and
local options to make system improvements necessary to accommodate projected
population growth
d. Adjacent jurisdictions in Kitsap County shall develop consistent street classification system
and street standards
e. Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council may establish a process for evaluating development
impacts including those that may affect neighboring j unsdictions within the county
f. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall function to ensure that transportation
planning, system management and improvements at local, regional, and state levels are
coordinated, complementary, and consistent with adopted comprehensive land use plans
10. Coordinated and consistent level of service (LOS)standards
a The County and the Cities should develop comparable level of service standards among the
County, Cities and the State of Washington for identified regional system components
b The County and the Cities shall adopt roadway LOS standards Urban growth management
agreements shall designate level of service standards
c. The County and the Cities shall adopt transit LOS in the form of "Service Standards"
adopted by the Kitsap Transit Board of Commissioners. The standards shall consider both
frequency of service and bus capacity
d. Consistent with State law, the County and Cities shall recognize the Level of Service
Standards for Highways of Statewide Significance, including principal arterial ferry routes,
that have been adopted by the Washington State Department of
Transportation, in their respective Comprehensive Plans
e For State highways and facilities of regional significance, including the Southworth ferry
route, the County and the Cities shall include the Level of Service Standards adopted for
these routes by the Puget Sound Regional Council, and-the Peninsula RTPO, and the
Washington State Department of Transportation, in their respective Comprehensive Plans
f On highways and streets which are subject to concurrency requirements, the County and
the Cities shall each identify capacity deficiencies and either address them in terns of
identified funding, adjust the LOS standard on a temporary basis, or place a temporary
moratorium on development
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
30
Xqvember- 14, :200
g On highways and streets which are subject to concurrency requirements, new development
should not cause LOS to degrade to a level lower than the adopted standard, consistent with
State law.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
Xewmber 19, 200
31
Element I. AMFdfible Housing
The Growth Management Act requires cities and counties to encourage the availability of housing
that is affordable for all income levels at a variety of housing densities Local jurisdictions are also
encouraged to preserve existing housing resources in their communities, and to provide an
adequate supply ofhousrng with good access to employment centers to support iob creation and
economic growth (WAC 365196 410) Countywide Planning Policies
VISION 2040 takes a comprehensive approach to Addressing Jobs Housing Balance:
addressing the range of housing needs Housing is C 21 Centers as areas of a mix of
addressed throughout the Countvwide Planning Policies C 4 business, commercial and ^
See box on right for specific references residential uses
Jobs Housing Balance: F 4 -c Mixed used development
Jobs - housing balance refers to relationship ofhousrng
supply and the iob base There are transportation J I -b Employment for diverse
implications in terms of improving accessibility between se mks of the community
where lobs are located and where people kve, as well as J I -e Economic Prosperity and
access to goods, services and other amenities Policies in increased lob opportunities
Element C Centers of Growth, Element F Contiguous
Compatible and Orderly Development, and Element J J 2 Promoting development of
Countywide Economic Development are all part o the designed industrial and
County's overall approach to lobs- housing balance commercial areas
Best Practices in Housing: J 3 Monitoring land supply
The County and the Cities recognize the value ofhousing
practices that preserve existing neighborhoods and communities use land more eEiciently make
services more economical, and meet the diverse needs of our coup 's changing demographics
The Community Design and Development Policies in Element F Contiguous Compatible and
Orderly Development address key innovative practices and design principles for development and
housing
Affordable Housing:
Housing affordabdrty refers to the balance (or imbalance) between household income and housing
costs Affordable housing is a ma
ior challenge in Kitsap County_
The following definitions relate to the Countywide Planning Policies
Below MaAiet Rate Housing shall mean housing intended for a full range of low to middle
+xser households- These income levels are €tiftheF defined as follows (WAC
365.19- 5) (WAC 365196 410 f21- e -i -C)
• Extremely low- income shall mean those households that have incomes that are at or
below 30% of the countywide median
• Very low - income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the
range of 31 - 50% of the countywide median
• Low - income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the range
of 51 - 80% of the countywide median
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
32
A49vember 19,L 200
• Moderate - income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the
range 81 -95% of the countywide median
• Middle- income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the
range of 96 -120% of the countywide median
■ Upper - income shall mean those households that have incomes above 120% of the
countywide median
Mar-ket Rate Housing shall mean housing intended for- households m4th ineemes theA are
gFeat tha 12 of the r „+.,.,..a° m edian
Policies for Affordable Housing (AH):
1. Coordinated process among County, Cities, and housing agencies for determining and
fulfilling housing needs, and the equitable distribution of ordable
housing at all income levels in Kitsap County:
a The County and the Cities should inventory the existing housing stock consistent with the
Growth Management Act synchronized with
County and Cities' respective Comprehensive Plan Updates and correlate with current
population and economic conditions, past trends, and ten year population and employment
forecasts, to determine short and long range housing needs, including rental and home
ownership Navy personnel housing policy should also be considered
b Local housing inventories, projections, and equitable distribution strategies should be
compiled, updated, and monitored under the coordination of the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council to identify countywide conditions and projected needs
c. Sucient land supply for housing including various housing OR shall be identified and
monitored through regular updates to the countywide Buildable Lands Analysis [see
Element B -1 Land Utilization and Monitoring Programsl
d The County and the Cities should each identify specific policies and implementation
strategies in their Comprehensive Plans and should enact implementing regulations to
provide a mix of housing types and costs to achieve identified goals for both faaf ate
and below "nark° using at all income levels, including easy access to employment
centers
e IRA-111-eies And- regulations shall efleoufte the pr-eduefien of below FROAet Fa4e Q&
heusing The County and the Cities shall incorporate a regular review of public health, and
safety, and development regulations pertaining to housing implementation strategies to
assure that.
i protection of the public health and safety remains the primary purpose for housing
standards
h regulations are streamlined and flexible to minimize additional costs to housing
2. Recognizing that the market place makes adequate provision for those in the upper
economic brackets, each jurisdiction should eeide� some combination of
appropriately zoned land, regulatory incentives, financial subsidies, and/or innovative
planning techniques to make adequate provisions for the needs of middle and lower
income persons. OWAG 365.195 070.6)
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
33 AdepW by Kilsap County Ordimanee 403 2007
Arewmber X, 200
: L Recognizing the percentage share of the existing and forecasted countywide population and
housing stock, as well as and -the distribution of existing below market -a*° housing f those
households below 120% countywide median income. the County and the Cities should
develop coordinated strategies to eqwtably disperse projected eoun*..vade bole •• mar- et r°*°
housing for those below 120% countywide median income needs throughout eftwo k --W
Kitsap County in the Urban GmyAh , where they are specifically found to be
appropriate in consideration of existing development patterns and densities in designated
Rural Ceffffnumties These strategies should promote the development of
such housing in a dispersed pattern so as not to concentrate or geographically isolate low -
income housing in a specific area or community.
-3-4 Provision of below maid et r-Me ° ordable housing for households
below 120% countywide median income should include:
d- a Bele w -nark°* � Housmg o t� ions should be located throughout Kitsap County in
Urban Growth Areas and Rural Communities, as defined in Element D (2 -a), m a manner
to provide easy access to transportation, employment, and other services
i. Designated Centers should include bolo • mark°* ate such housing o tp ions
ii Rural self- help housing programs should be encouraged first in UGA's and Rural
Communities and then allowed in other appropriate areas as defined by the US
Dept ofAgrtculture - in or- eutside of designated Rufal Communities
either
a.b Local comprehensive plan policies and development regulations shafl-that encourage and
do not exclude bolo • Faar-k°* +tee such housing
b: c Housing strategies sheW4- include
i. preservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of existing neighborhoods as
appropriate, including programs to rehabilitate and/or energy retro -fit substandard
housing,
ii provision for a range of housing types such as multi- family, single family, accessory
dwelling units, cooperative housing, and manufactured housing on individual lots and
in manufactured housing parks;
iii housing design and siting compatible with surrounding neighborhoods,
tv mechanisms to help people purchase their own housing, such as low interest loan
programs, "self- help" housing, and consumer education
v innovative regulatory strategies shall be develeped and implemented at provide
incentives for the development of below .r arike -a such housmg
n}eans such as. reducing housing cost by subsidizing utility hook -up fees and rates,
impact fees, and permit processing fees, density incentives, smaller lot sizes, zero lot
line designs, inclusionary zoning techniques, such as requiring below fnaAet rte
housing for specified income level s in new residential developments, transfers of
development rights and /or a priority permit review and approval process and/or other
provisions as appropriate
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
Xqvembep 19,200
e-d Housing policies and programs -that address the provision of diverse housing
opportunities to accommodate the homeless, the elderly, physically or mentally
challenged, and other segments of the population that have special needs
h- a The r , ouat y and the Citie sh Da rt i c i pateion with housing authorities to
facilitate the production of below mar -ket � such housing The County and the Cities
shall also recognize and support other public and private not - for - profit housing agencies
Supporting housing agencies is encouraged through public land donations, guarantees,
suitable design standards, tax incentives, fee waivers, providing access to funding
sources and support for funding applications, or other provisions as appropriate
S The County and the Cities shall collaborate with PSRC to evaluate availabilitVof appropriate
housing types to serve future residents and changing demographics
Recommended to Kasap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
A;gwmbff 19 200
Element I Countywide Economic Development
Growth Management Act requires that general economic development policies be identified in the
Countywide Planning Policies Consistent with the goals of the Act, economic development
planning must be coordinated with local comprehensive plans The intent of the following policies
is to encourage coordinated economic growth among all jurisdictions in Kitsap County and to add
predictability and certainty to the private investment decision
Policies for Countywide Economic Development (ED):
1. A general strategy for enhancing economic development and employment:
a The County and the Cities recognize that a healthy economy
` weir° segments of the ,.,..,,.,,,,mo.y i s important to the health of residents and quality of
life in the county Economic development should be balanced with environmental
concerns and protect the quality of life
b A healthy economy provides a spectrum oftobs including entry - level, living wage, and
advanced wage earner employment that, raises family income levels and provides
opportunities for diverse segments of the community
h- c The County and the Cities recognize that the economy in Kitsap County is very dependent
on the U S Navy and diversification is necessary Diversification should be promote
through a multi- faceted strategy that includes broadening the customer bases ofexisting
contracting industries, expanding the number of local businesses that benefit from defense
contracting and building the base of business activity that is not directly connected to the
Department of Defense
b--d The County and the Cities shall collaborate with ports, tribes, and other special districts to
encourage economic growth and diversification that is consistent with comprehensive plans
and policies for land use, transportation, public transit, regional water supply, capital
facilities, urban governmental services and environmental quality
e-e Local governments are encouraged to utilize the Kitsap Economic Development Eounsil
Alliance (KEDA) a resource to provide advice on economic development needs, the
potential for retaining and expanding existing industries, including the U S Dept. of
Defense, and attracting new industries, especially those that would improve wage and
salary levels, increase the variety of job opportunities, and utilize the resident labor force
f The County and the Cities should cooperate /participate with the Puget Sound Regional
Council's economic initiatives, including focus on identified industry clusters and clean
industry and with the KEDA's adopted plan, Kitsap 20120 A Strategy for Sustainable
Economic Prosperity
dg The County and the Cities recognize that widespread access to broadband capability will
enhance economic development in Kitsap County Local governments are encouraged to
collaborate with the Kitsap Eeeaemir. DeyelepmefA Geune4 to promote the
expansion of telecommunications in Kitsap County and to coordinate telecommunications
policy with regional and federal agencies, including public utility districts, Bonneville
Power Administration, regional transportation planning organizations, and neighboring
counties
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
36
Arevember 19L, 200
eh Investments in our people, in particular, e fforts of local educational institutions to rp ovide,
improve and expand vocational and post - secondary education programs should be
supported to assure a highly skilled, technically trained resident work force
2. The role of government agencies in assuring coordinated, consistent efforts to promote
economic vitality and equity throughout Kitsap County:
a The County and the Cities shall promote Urban Growth Areas and existing industrial sites
as centers for employment
b The County and the Cities shall encourage the full utilization/development of designated
industrial and commercial areas The County and the Cities shall promote revitalization
within existing developed industrial and commercial areas to take advantage of the
significant investments in existing buildings and infrastructure
c The County and the Cities shall cooperate with tribes, ports, other special districts, and all
economic development interests to identify the capital facility needs of designated
to support economic development and
should identify necessary funding sources
d The County and the Cities shall collaborate with tribes, ports, and other special districts to
identify innovative development methods such as public and private partnerships and
community development assistance financing to increase economic vitality
e The County and the Cities shall collaborate with the EDG and the Ports to
establish a common method to monitor the supply of designated commercial and
industrial sites and to ensure adequate land supply for the expansion of existing
enterprises and the establishment of new economic enterprises The monitoring
method shall indicate environmental constraints, infrastructure availability and
capacity, and shall use the Kitsap County Geographic Information System and Land
Capacity Analysis as a regional database for this information
F The County and the Cities shall establish common infrastructure policy and standards,
including telecommunications infrastructure
g The County, Cities and KEDA shall collaborate to identify opportunities that favor local
suppliers for goods and services
3. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall coordinate the development of land
supply monitoring methods, common infrastructure policy and standards, and other
strategies among the County, the Cities, Tribes, Ports, and other special districts to
encourage economic development in Kitsap County:
a The County and the Cities shall each establish and monitor a development review process
that is timely, predictable, efficient, fair, and consistent
b Where more than one jurisdiction is involved in planning and permitting a business
development, the j unsdictions shall work collaboratively to provide consistent development
regulations and permitting
c. The County and the Cities shall encourage small business enterprises and cottage
industries, and allow appropriate and traditional home occupations as permitted by local
regulations.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
37 MepW by K-Mwp County Ordimanee 403 200
Xqwmber 19, 200
Element K. An Analysis of the Fiscal Impact
In order to preserve and maintain the community's quality of life and level of government services,
jurisdictions are expected to fully evaluate their financial capacity to provide the full range of
urban services (as described in Element B — 3D]) within designated Urban Growth Areas
Policies for Analysis of Fiscal Impact (FI1:
1 The Countywide Plammng Policies recognize three opportunities for jurisdictions to consider
and plan for urban-level infrastructure and services
a During each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan amendments, through the Capital Facilities
Plan, including sub -area plans, Urban Growth Area boundary changes, incorporations,
partial dis- incorporations, proposed new fully contained communities and master planned
resorts
b At the point where ajunsdiction is comparing and analyzing geographic areas for possible
expansion of its Urban Growth Area (as described in Element B — 3[j])
c As part of the development of the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (see
Element B -4 [d] and Appendix C)
These analyses and plans should identify infrastructure and service costs as well as the
anticipated revenues to support them
2 Special districts should be included in planning for the provision of urban level services in
Urban Growth Areas and should include future population growth in their plans
3 The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall facilitate on -going regional discussion of
infrastructure and service delivery strategies (see Element F -1 [c]) and revenue equity issues
(see Element F -3 [c])
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
38
Newmber 19, 200
Element L. Coordination with Tribal Governments
The Suquamish Tribe, the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, and other federally recognized Indian
tribes have reservations and/or trust resources within Kitsap County, Washington These tribes are
parties to treaties with the United States Government through which certain rights and privileges
both on and off reservation were articulated and remain in effect These tribes have authorities,
responsibilities, interests and treaty rights within their respective reservation boundaries and Usual
and Accustomed Areas Since future growth and land use decisions in KitsapCounty affect all
governmental entities, governmental agencies must be well informed and continuously involved in
regional and local planning
Policies for Coordination with Tribal Governments (CT):
1 Meaningful and substantial opportunities for early and continuous tribal government
participation shall be incorporated into regional and local planning activities
2 Local jurisdictions should work with the tribes to develop agreements that provide for
discussion on comprehensive planning issues among governments and ensure that the tribes are
consulted on issues within their interest The parties will jointly determine the appropriate
contents of the agreements and a schedule for completing them
3 Tribal governments, federal agencies, and county and local governments are encouraged to
coordinate plans among and between governments and agencies to address substantive areas of
mutual interest especially where geographical areas overlay and promote complementary and
cooperative efforts
4 City and County governments are encouraged to include Tribal governments in joint
comprehensive planning and development activities for areas within the Tribes' Usual and
Accustomed areas. Activities include but are not limited to the establishment and revision of
urban growth boundaries, distribution of forecasted population, regional transportation, capital
facility, housing and utility plans, and policies that may affect natural and/or cultural resources
5. All County, City, and Tribal government agencies shall be included in the normal public notice
and comment procedures of other agencies and kept informed of matters of interest to them
6 The County, the Cities, and Tribal governmental agencies are encouraged to keep one another
informed about matters of local and regional interest by mutually agreeable means and
schedule.
Recommended to Krtsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
39
Element M. Coordination with Federal Government including Navy
The federal government has unique authorities, responsibilities, interests affecting land use
and other activities Military installations are ofparticular importance to the economic health
of Washmiton State, as well as to national security Since the impacts of future growth and
development in Kitsap County affect all governmental entities, governmental agencies must
be well informed and continuously involved in regional and local planning
Policies for Coordination with Federal Government (CF):
1 Meaningful and substantial opportunities for early and continuous federal government
participation shall be incorporated into regional and local planning activities
2 It is recognized that constitutional and statutory provisions may constrain federal
government agencies from entering into local agreements and processes However, when
possible, the County, the Cities, and federal governments should establish
intergovernmental cooperative agreements promoting coordination and involvement in
activities that are of mutual interest
3 Federal agencies and county and local governments are encouraged to coordinate plans
among and between governments and agencies to make plans as consistent and
compatible as possible for properties over which they have authority or activities they
authorize and the adjacent areas affected
4 Federal government agencies are encouraged to participate in City, County, and joint
comprehensive planning and development activities that may affect them, including the
establishment and revision of urban growth areas encompassing, adjacent to or within
federally -owned lands, distribution of forecasted population, regional transportation,
capital facility, housing and utility plans, and policies that may affect natural and/or
cultural resources of interest
5 The following policies relate to promoting coordination among the Cities, County, and the
federal government including the Navy
a All jurisdictions should promote planning that considers the impact of new growth to
avoid the potential for encroachment on military readiness activities as described
below when developing zoning ordinances or designating land uses affecting military
facilities Each jurisdiction and the Navy should coordinate to identify the types of
development and areas of interest to the Navy, method of notice, and opportunities for
comment
b "Military readiness activities" mean all of the following
i Training, support, and operations that prepare the men and women of the
military and Naval ships and submarines for combat
ii Operation, maintenance, and security of any military installation
iu Testing of military equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper
operation or suitability for combat use
c "Impacts" include but are not limited to
i Aircraft, boat, and rail traffic.
u Incompatible adjacent land uses
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
40
d Through the K tsap Regional Coordinating Council, jurisdictions should monitor
issues that anse in implementing these policies, and should identify areas for
improved coordination
6 All County, City, and federal governmental agencies shall be included in the normal
public notice and comment procedures of other agencies and kept informed of matters of
interest to them (RCW 36 70A 530)
7 The County, the Cities, and federal governmental agencies are encouraged to keep one
another informed of matters of local and regional interest by mutually agreeable means
and schedule
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
41 Adepted by Kimap Geway Ordinance 40-3 :2007
Element N. Roles and Responsibilities
The County, Cities, Tribal governments, and special districts are all involved in planning activities
related to their statutory authority and responsibility In addition to the responsibilities defined in
previous countywide planning policies, this section further clarifies the planning roles and
responsibilities of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council and member agencies
Policies for Roles and Responsibilities (RR):
1. The KITSAP REGIONAL COORDINATING COUNCIL was established by interlocal
agreement (see Appendix E) to assure coordination, consensus, consistency, and
compliance in the implementation of the Growth Management Act and comprehensive
planning by County, city and tribal governments within Kitsap County. The Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council also provides a voice for all jurisdictions and opportunity
for citizens and stakeholders to provide input to planning policies to be applied
countywide. The interlocal agreement adopted by the County, the Cities and the Tribal
governments declared that the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council is necessary to
maintain a regular intergovernmental communication network for all local and tribal
governments within the county, facilitate compliance with the coordination and
consistency requirements of the Growth Management Act, provide an effective vehicle to
resolve conflict among and /or between jurisdictions with respect to urban growth
boundaries or comprehensive plan consistency, and to build consensus on planning
solutions for countywide growth management issues. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council shall:
a Submit agreed -upon recommendations on behalf of member jurisdictions to multi- county
regional agencies and State government on proposed changes to multi- county regional
plans, State plans, and laws
b Provide a forum, as necessary, for achieving coordination in the development of local plans
and resolving planning and plan implementation issues that are common among
jurisdictions
c Promote coordination and consistency among local plans and between local plans and the
Countywide Planning Policies and the - Growth Management Act to the extent necessary to
achieve regional policies and objectives. Through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council forum, jurisdictions should establish a process to monitor and review individual
comprehensive plans and associated implementation mechanisms to determine consistency
with the Countywide Planning Policies.
d Serve as a forum for resolving disputes locally The process shall not preclude appeals to
the Central Puget Sound Growth Planning Hearings Board if the local process has been
exhausted without resolution of the dispute.
e Promote coordination of educational programs and the dissemination of planning- related
information of regional interest
f Coordinate the review, revision and monitoring of the Countywide Planning Policies
g Apply for grants and administer contracts relative to regional tasks and plans
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
h Conduct the region -wide growth management planning consistent with these policies
i Initiate and coordinate the development of other regional planning policies and
implementation mechanisms that may improve the effectiveness ofthe comprehensive
planning process
J Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous public
involvement in policy discussions facilitated by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council.
2. KITSAP COUNTY is the regional government within the county boundaries providing
various services within unincorporated and incorporated areas as required and specified
by law and by legal agreements. Kitsap County shall:
a Be responsible for the development, adoption and implementation of comprehensive plans
and development regulations and the processing of land use permits for the unincorporated
portions of the county
b Be responsible for coordinating water quality planning in multi- lunsdictional watersheds
and for other environmental planning activities as agreed to by all affected and interested
jurisdictions
c Be responsible for coordinating the response on the listing for the federal Endangered
Species Act in multi -junsdictional watersheds as agreed by all affected and interested
jurisdictions
d Be responsible for being a regional sewer provider to the unincorporated areas of Kitsap
County as needed to improve water quality consistent with levels of service outlined in the
County Comprehensive Plan
e Maintain a geographic information system to serve as a regional planning data base
f Execute Urban Growth Area Management Agreements with each city to address point
issues identified in the Countywide Planning Policies and other matters agreed to be of
mutual interest
g Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous public
involvement throughout short and long range planning projects
3. CITIES within Kitsap County provide a variety of services primarily to residents within
their respective municipal boundaries. Cities shall:
a Provide urban governmental services as identified in the Growth Management Act (Chapter
36 70A RCW) and adopted urban growth management agreements
b Be responsible for the development, adoption and implementation of comprehensive plans
and development regulations and the processing of land use permits within the incorporated
portion of the respective city
c Participate with other agencies in multi- lunsdictional planning activities including but not
limited to environmental planning, e g water quality planning and coordinating the
response on the listing for the Federal Endangered Species Act in multi jurisdictional
watersheds transportation planning, and growth management strategies
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
43 10 2007
d Execute a separate Urban Growth Area Management Agreement with Kitsap County to
address point issues identified in the Countywide Planning Policies and other matters agreed
to be of mutual interest
e Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous public
involvement throughout short and long range planning projects
4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS are governmental subdivisions of the county that are usually
established to provide a defined scope of services. Special districts shall:
a Be responsible for service provision, capital facility planning and other activities as
authorized by law and legal agreements
b Coordinate capital planning and implementation strategies with local governments to assure
consistency with comprehensive plan policies, the Countywide Planning Policies, and the
WA State Growth Management Act;
c Participate in service provision identification required in each urban growth management
agreement,
d Coordinate with other agencies as appropriate in multi- lunsdictional planning activities,
e Provide technical assistance as appropriate to assist local governments in comprehensive
plan development, adoption and implementation,
f Bee - Encouraged te- enter - i ooperative agreements and consolidate when possible to
formalize participation in local and regional processes,
g Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous public
involvement throughout short and long range planning projects
h Site and size facilities consistent with local plans
S. The County and Cities shall coordinate with the County Department ofEmergency
Management to ensure system integrity and coordinated response in the event of disasters
and other emergencies.
6 The County and Cities shall coordinate with the County Department of Emergency
Management to ensure the integrity of the National Incident Management system and
coordinated response in the event of disasters and other emergencies
Recommended to Kamp County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
44
Appendix A:
Kitsap Countywide Planning Policy Ratification Process
r -------------- - - - - -�
Draft Revisions through i County, City, & Tribal Councils review
possible revisions to the CPP's
Planning Directors _________ _________,
The Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council Board
Adopt and Recommend CPPs
• Discuss CPP's
• Release draft for Public Comme Estimated
• Public Hearing 3 Months
Kitsap County • Discuss CPP's
Adoption by Ordinance • Recommend to County, Cities, &
• SEPA Review Tribes
• Kitsap County Public Hearing
• Kitsap County Ordinance City & Tribal Councils Ratify
(may change document) • Resolution to Ratify (Within
Estimated 90 days of County Ordinance)
2 Months ■ Yes Up to
■ No 3 Months
• No Resolution abstention
County Ordinance Takes Effect If 2+ Cities don't
Begin 60 day City /State Ratify or Abstain:
Appeal Period to GMHB 3 +Cities Ratify y
to KRCC for
further discussion
60 days
j Note that the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council anticipates refinements
to this process over time i
tided to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
a
Appendix B: Population Distribution 2005 - 2025
Population Distribution 2000 Through 2025
+New =Total Annual
2005 through 2025 Population Po ulation in 2025 Growth Rate
Bremerton city 37,259 14,759 52,017 134%
East UGA 1 5,412 2,210 7,622 1.38%
West UGA 3,229 2,017 5,246 196%
Bremerton Port UGA 68 -68 0 -10000%
Central Kitsa UGA 21,743 8,733 30,476 136%
Gorst UGA 154 73 227 156%
Silverdale UGA 15,276 8,059 23,335 1.71%
Bainbridge Island City 20,308 8,352 28,660 139%
- Kingston UGA 1,871 3,135 5,006 402%
Poulsbo city 6,813 3,739 10,552 1.77%
UGA 901 3,355 4,256 641%
Port Orchard City 7,693 3,600 11,293 155%
UGA 11,570 3,375 14,945 103%
Port Orchard UGA Expansion 0 6,334 6,334
Stud Area
South Kitsap UGA 7 1,241 8,024 9,265 837%
UGA Pop ulation 133,537 58% 75,697 76% 209,234 181%
Non -UGA Population 98,432 42% 23,905 24% 122,337 37% 087%
Total County Population 231,969 99,602 331,571 1.44%
OFM Projection through 2025 Low 268,573 0.59%
Intermediate 331,571 144%
High 412,391 233%
Kitsap County Historical Growth
1 Based on PSRC Model US
2 Based on City and/or County Census Annual
Comprehensive or Sub -area 1960 84,176 Growth Rate
�lanning 1970 101,732 1.91%
Target to be substantiated by 1980 147,152 376%
further analysis and/or Sub -area 1990 189,731 257%
planning 2000 231,969 203%
Office of Financial 2004 239,500 080%
Management official estimate
Note Population Banking as described in Population distribution will be reviewed through the Kitsap Regional
Kitsap County's Updated Comprehensive Coordinating Council process every five years The review will
Plan LU -13 applies to the potential need include an analysts of the Cities' and County's progress in achieving
in specific UGA's (e g Central Kitsap) to target distributions If the 76% UGA target mentioned above for new
work with adjacent Cities to resolve unmet population growth and the overall population targets are met or
population growth targets through an exceeded, the target for new population will revert to five sixths
UGAMA or to re- allocate population to (83 %), as per the revised County-wide Planning Policies adopted by
other UGA's over time, through the Kitsap County Ordinance #258 -01 on August 20, 2001 Otherwise,
Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council the target may be reaffirmed or explicitly modified , 2011
c Alevember 4, 200
Appendix C: Urban Growth Area Management Agreements
The intent of the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement is to facilitate and encourage
annexation and/or incorporation of urban areas over the 20 year planning period and to ensure
compatibility of development within the unincorporated Urban Growth Area. Each Urban Growth
Area Management Agreement shall:
1 Describe the goals and procedures of the point planning process including roles and responsibilities for
the unincorporated Urban Growth Area, with the goal of having compatible City and County plans,
zoning, and development regulations The following provisions should apply to the entire Urban Growth
Area associated with the City unless mutually agreed otherwise by the City and County
a The City's zoning code, densities, and development, sub - division, environmental, and construction
standards
b The City's Levels of Service
c The Comprehensive Plan of the City should reflect land use planning for the entire Urban Growth
Area
2 Identify responsibility and mechanisms for comprehensive plan amendments, zoning changes and
development applications within unincorporated Urban Growth Areas Significant weight should be
given to City preferences
3 Identify services to be provided in the Urban Growth Area, the responsible service purveyors, and the
terms under which the services shall be provided, including
Fire Storm Water Solid Waste
Police Potable Water Park & Recreation Facilities
Transportation Sewer Schools
Utilities- Power and Telecommunications, including broadband where available
EMS
All service providers, including special districts, and adjacent jurisdictions should be included in Urban
Growth Area planning
4 Reference the adopted Revenue Sharing Inter -local Agreement, as appropriate (see Appendix D)
5. Develop pre - annexation plans, which shall include
a. Conditioning City service extensions upon actual annexation for properties contiguous to the City
boundary or to agreements of no protest to future annexation for properties not contiguous
b. Offering pre - annexation agreements to property owners interested in annexation and needing
assurances from the City about services, planning, or other issues
c. Plans for tiering and/or phasing of infrastructure development, appropriate to the individual Urban
Growth Area
d. City priorities for City -led annexation efforts as appropriate.
6 Describe the development and implementation of a public involvement program that identifies roles and
responsibilities for respective jurisdictions, including actions and timeline
7 Be reflected in County and City Comprehensive plans
Recommended to K:tsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
Arewmber 49-,:200
c
Appendix D
Interlocal Agreement Between Kitsap County and the City of Bainbridge Island,
City of Bremerton, City of Port Orchard and City of Poulsbo Concerning Revenue
Sharing Upon Annexation and In Conjunction With Major Land Use Decisions
Within a City's Urban Growth Area
Adopted by all parties in November- December, 2001
Effective November 24, 2010, the City of Port Orchard is officiall y withdrawn from this agreement
Effective November 29, 2011, the City of Bremerton is officiall y withdrawn from this agreement
This Agreement, made pursuant to Chapter 39 34 RCW, is between KITSAP COUNTY (hereinafter, the
County), a political subdivision of the State of Washington, and the CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND,
the CITY OF BREMERTON, the CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, and the CITY OF POULSBO,
(hereinafter, the Cities), municipal subdivisions of the State of Washington
WHEREAS, through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, the County and the Cities have worked
together constructively on revenue sharing issues that in the past have been adversarial, and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities sought a balanced set of revenue sharing provisions that would
benefit both the County and the Cities and support the orderly evolution of logical land use patterns and
jurisdictional boundaries, and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities reached accord on a set of Principles of Agreement for Revenue
Sharing in Annexations and in Major Land Use Decisions, and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities desire to implement the Principles of Agreement through an interlocal
agreement,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions contained herein,
the parties agree as follows
SECTION 1 ANNEXATIONS
The purpose of this section is to provide a framework for logical and orderly annexations that are
consistent with the Growth Management Act, Chapter 36 70A RCW (hereinafter GMA), and to mitigate
the fiscal impact to the County of annexations initiated after the effective date of this agreement.
1.1 The Cities each confirm their willingness to eventually annex all land within their designated
Urban Growth Area (hereinafter UGA) boundaries
1.2 Each City shall encourage annexation of all lands equally, and will support logical and
coordinated annexations, consistent with the intent of the GMA
1.3 As part of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council's 2002 Work Program, the County and
Cities will continue to address coordinated development within the UGAs, including
infrastructure standards and funding
1.4 Before the County constructs a major infrastructure improvement within a City's designated
UGA, the County and the City will negotiate and execute an interlocal agreement that
specifies the level at which the City shall reimburse the County for a portion of its investment
in the infrastructure improvement if the area where the improvement is to be located is
annexed within a specified period of time
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
d Adepmd by Kimap County QAAwawee 4-0-3 260607
Xqvember 19-,200
1.5 The County and the Cities anticipate that each specific proposed annexation will require
negotiation of other issues particular to its time, place and geography The Cities and the
County commit to completing these negotiations and executing an interlocal agreement on
such issues in a timely manner
1.6 As part of this agreement, the County will not oppose annexations within that City's
designated UGA or invite the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction
1.7 The Cities agree to share with the County revenue lost to the County and gained by the
annexing City as follows
A Revenue sharing payments shall be based on the following three sources of
revenue
1 The County's portion of the local retail sales tax levied under Chapter
82 14 RCW
2 The ad valorem property tax levied by the County pursuant to RCW
36 82 040 for establishment and maintenance of county transportation
systems
3 The admission tax levied by the County pursuant to Chapter 36 38
RCW
B For purposes of this Section, "lost revenue" means an amount computed as follows
The combined total of the County's collections from all three sources
within the annexation area dunng the calendar year preceding annexation
minus
The combined total of the County's collections from all three sources
within the annexation area during the first full calendar year following
annexation
C The amount of the payment from the City to the County will be based on a three -year "soft
landing" approach as follows
1 The Year 1 payment will be equal to 75% of the County's lost revenue
2 The Year 2 payment will be equal to 50% of the County's lost revenue
3 The Year 3 payment will be equal to 25% of the County's lost revenue
D The calculation of lost revenue pursuant to subsection B of this Section requires revenue
data for one full year following annexation Therefore, the County shall initiate a request
for payment under this Section by written notice to the annexing City within two years of
the effective date of the annexation
SECTION 2 MAJOR LAND USE ACTIONS
The purpose of this section is to recognize that retail development near jurisdictional boundaries has
an impact on neighboring jurisdictions and, in particular, on existing businesses and the demand for
public services and facilities This Section is designed to mitigate these impacts by providing that sales
tax revenues from new mayor business development within a City's designated UGA, or from the
Recommended to Krtsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
d
relocation of an existing mayor business from a City to a location within the City's designated UGA, will
be shared with the affected City
2.1 For purposes of this Agreement, "mayor land use" means
A A new development within a City's designated UGA that houses any single retail tenant
greater than 40,000 square feet
B The expansion of an existing retail business within the City's designated UGA if the
expansion is greater than 40,000 square feet
C A retail business greater than 25,000 square feet that is relocated from a City to the City's
designated UGA Or
D An automobile, truck, recreational vehicle, manufactured or mobile home, or boat
dealership, regardless of the size of the building permitted, that is newly located within a
City's designated UGA, or relocated from a City to the City's designated UGA.
2.2 The County agrees to share with the affected City revenue lost to the City and gained by the
County due to a mayor land use, as follows
A Revenue sharing payments will be required only for local retail sales tax revenues
generated from mayor land uses Because there are limitations, related to confidentiality,
on using a figure based on actual sales tax collections from the new or relocated business,
the revenue sharing payment will be based on estimated sales tax revenues derived by
using industry standards, such as the Washington State Department of Revenue or the
Urban Land Institute, for taxable retail sales per square foot for businesses.
B For purposes of this Section, "lost revenue" means an amount computed as follows
Total gross enclosed building square footage of the mayor land use
X
Industry standard annual average retail sales per square foot for category of business that most closely
resembles the mayor land use
X
Tax rate levied under Chapter 82 14 RCW
for the first full calendar year following the date on which the County issues a certificate of occupancy
for the major land use
C The County will make revenue sharing payments for the first full three years after the
mayor land use receives a certificate of occupancy
D The revenue sharing payment from the County to the affected City will be calculated
according to the following formulas
1 For the relocation of a mayor retail business from a City to the City's designated
UGA
a The Year 1 payment will be equal to 75% of the City's lost revenue,
b The Year 2 payment will be equal to 50% of the City's lost revenue, and
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
c The Year 3 payment will be equal to 25% of the City's lost revenue
2 For new development within a City's designated UGA that houses any single retail
tenant greater than 40,000 square feet, the payment amount will be 50% of the
City's estimated lost revenue each year for the first three years
F The calculation of lost revenue pursuant to subsection B of this Section requires revenue
data for one full year following issuance of a certificate of occupancy Therefore, the
affected City shall initiate a request for payment under this Section by written notice to the
County within two years of the date the major land use receives the County's permission to
occupy the building
SECTION 3 MISCELLANEOUS
3.1 Duration. This Agreement will remain in effect until the terms of the Agreement are
fulfilled There is no other term agreed to by the parties
3.2 Reevaluation. Any City or the County may request immediate reevaluation of this
Agreement by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council Revenue Sharing Policy Committee
If the reevaluation fails to yield a resolution satisfactory to the requesting party within six
months from the date the request for reevaluation was made, the requesting party may initiate
the process for termination provided in this Agreement
3.3 Termination. After completion of the Reevaluation process required by this Agreement, a
party may terminate this Agreement by 12 months' written notice to the other parties
Termination does not extinguish the obligations of the terminating party under this Agreement
for annexations initiated, or major land uses for which an application is filed, prior to the
effective date of termination
3.4 Filing. When fully executed, this Agreement shall be filed with the Kitsap County Auditor
3.5 Notices. Any notices required by this Agreement shall be delivered, or mailed postage
prepaid, and addressed to
Kitsap County City of Bainbridge Island Ci y of Bremerton
Clerk to the Board City Clerk City Clerk
Office of the Kitsap County City of Bainbridge Island City of Bremerton
Board of Commissioners 280 Madison Avenue N 3456 th Street, Suite 600
614 Division Street Bainbridge Island, WA98110 Bremerton, WA98337
Mail stop 4
Port Orchard, WA98366
City of Port Orchard City of Poulsbo Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
City Clerk Mayor Chair
City of Port Orchard City of Poulsbo Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
216 Prospect Street P O Box 1934
Port Orchard, WA98366 P ^ Kingston, WA98346
200 NE Moe Street
Poulsbo, WA98370
3.6 Administration. As this Agreement contemplates no joint or cooperative undertaking, each
party shall administer the Agreement as to its own responsibilities under the Agreement The
Recommended to Krtsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
d
Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall oversee the revenue sharing process provided for
in this Agreement
3.7 Reporting. The County and the Cities shall report to the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council at the start of each calendar year any payments made or received by the reporting
,jurisdiction pursuant to this Agreement during the preceding calendar year
3.8 Waiver. The failure by the County or any City to enforce any term or condition of this
Agreement shall not be construed to constitute a waiver of any other term or condition, or of
any subsequent breach of any provision, of this Agreement
3.9 Entire Agreement. This Agreement includes the entire agreement of the parties with respect
to any matter addressed in this Agreement
3.10 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only upon the written agreement of the
parties made with the same formalities as those required for its original execution
3.11. Countywide Planning Policy. To the extent that anything in this Agreement may be found to
be inconsistent with any part of the Kitsap County -wide Planning Policy, the County and City
in 2002 will review the applicable parts of the County-wide Planning Policy and revise them
in accordance with this Agreement
3.12 Review. The County and the Cities shall review this Agreement within the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council in December of 2003, and every five years thereafter
3.13 Effective Date. This Agreement shall take effect retroactively to September 4, 2001, as this
date has been expressly agreed upon by all the parties
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
d
Appendix E: Interlocal Agreement Establishing the Adopted by Kitsap County
Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council and all four cities
3/21- 6/20/01
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the undersigned members of the Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council, pursuant to provisions of the Inter -local Cooperation Act of 1967, Chapter
39 34 RCW
WHEREAS, the undersigned members recognize the need and desirability to participate in a forum for
intergovernmental coordination, cooperation, and consultation among member agencies in order to bring
about a continuous and comprehensive regional planning process and efficient service delivery, and
WHEREAS, the undersigned members desire jointly to undertake continuous cooperative regional
development, land use, housing, capital facility, service, and transportation planning, and
WHEREAS, it is the belief of the undersigned members that regional deliberations, planning, and review
should be accomplished whenever possible by all jurisdictions affected and should receive policy direction
from all local general purpose and tribal governments,
THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants herein it is hereby agreed
1 DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Inter -local Agreement and all other agreements, contracts, and
documents executed, adopted, or approved pursuant to this agreement, the following terms have the
meaning prescribed to them in this section unless the context of their use dictates otherwise
a "Member agency" means any public body which is a party or becomes a party to this inter -local
agreement and is a County, City, or federally- recognized Tribal government within the region,
b "State" means the State of Washington,
c "Region" means the territory physically lying within the boundaries of Kitsap County,
d. "Council" means the body of local and tribal elected officials designated in accord with the By -laws
of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council to represent member agencies to carry out all delegated
powers and managerial and administrative responsibilities of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council;
e. "Majority vote" means more than one -half of the votes cast when a quorum is present and must
include a majority of votes from County representatives and a majority of votes from the
representatives of at least two separate cities
2 ORGANIZATION — COMPOSITION AND NATURE The undersigned member agencies constitute the
Council- Kitsap County, City of Bainbridge Island, City of Bremerton, City of Port Orchard, City of
Poulsbo, the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe and the Suquamish Tribe Management of the Council is
structured as provided herein and by the Council Bylaws
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
e X, 2007
3 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSES The Council has the following authorities and purposes
a To provide a regional forum for deliberations and cooperative decision - making by the region's elected
officials in order to bring about a continuous and comprehensive planning process
b To foster cooperation and mediate differences among governments throughout the region
c To coordinate actions to provide for a sustainable economy and environment for the region
d To carry out such other planning and coordinating activities authorized by majority vote of the
Council including participation in other forums and organizations
e To provide for administrative services necessary and incidental to the aforementioned Council
activities
4 FINANCING The Council receives funds from each member agency as provided by the Bylaws and from
other available funding sources The Council may apply for funding of any nature as may become
available to assist the Council in carrying out its purposes and functions
5 FISCAL YEAR AND BUDGET The fiscal year coincides with the calendar year The Council adopts an
annual work program and budget in advance of each fiscal year that identifies anticipated activities,
goals, revenues, and expenditures for completing the work program A draft work program and budget is
prepared by the Executive Committee established by the By -laws of the Council and is submitted for
consideration and approval by the full Council After the Council has approved the final budget it is
forwarded to the County for inclusion as a distinct agency fund within the Kitsap County Budget No
increase or decrease to the final budget shall occur without the approval of the Council
6 WITHDRAWAL FROM AGREEMENT Any member agency has the right to withdraw from this Inter -local
Agreement by giving the Council six (6) months prior written notice Unless otherwise provided by
future agreement, any member agency that withdraws shall remain responsible for its financial and other
obligations with regard to Council activities until the effective date of withdrawal and with regard to
agreements to which the Council is a party and which exist at the time of such notice of withdrawal
Withdrawal by one member agency to this Inter -local Agreement shall not terminate the agreement as to
any other remaining member agencies
7 DISPOSAL OF ASSETS Upon termination of this agreement any Council assets, after payment of all
liabilities, costs, expenses, and charges validly incurred under this agreement, shall be distributed to all
contributing member agencies in proportion to their contribution determined at the time of termination
The debts, liabilities, and obligations of the Council shall not constitute a debt, liability, or obligation of
any member agency
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
Appendix F: Regional and Kitsap Designated Centers List Adopted 2004
Regional City of Bremerton Metro Center
(Adopted by PSRC) Silverdale Urban Core Urban Center
South Kitsap Industrial Area Industrial/Employment Center
Jurisdiction Jurisdiction's (Comp Plan Des► nation KRCC Center Designation
Kitsap County Kingston Town or City Center/Transp Hub
Kitsap County Southworth Transp ortation Hub
Kitsap County Su uamish Activit /Em to ment Center— Transp ortation Hub
City of Bremerton Harrison Employment Center Activity /Em to ment Center
City of Bremerton NW Corporate Campus Employment Center Activity/Employment Center
City of Bremerton Port Blakely Employment Center Activity/Employment Center
City of Bremerton Upper Wheaton District Center Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton Lower Wheaton District Center Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton Sylvan/Pine Neighborhood Center Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton Perry Avenue Neighborhood Center Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton Manette Neighborhood Center Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton Charleston Neighborhood Center Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton Haddon Ne► borhood Center Mixed Use Center/ Nei hborhood
City of Bainbridge Island Winslow Core Town or City Center
City of Bainbridge Island Day Road Light Manufacturing Area Activity/Employment Center
City of Bainbridge Islagd Lynnwood - Neighborhood Service Centers* Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bainbridge Island Rollin Bay - Nei hborhood Service Centers* Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bainbridge island Island Center - Neighborhood Service Centers* Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Poulsbo Poulsbo Town Center Town or City Center
City of Poulsbo Olhava Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Port Orchard City of Port Orchard Town or City Center/ Transportation Hub
City of Port Orchard Tremont Community Services Activity /Employment Center
City of Port Orchard South Kitsap Mall — Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
Kitsap Transit Historic Mosquito Fleet Terminals =Transportation Hub
'�- Special Planning Areas
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
f
Appendix G:
Centers &Local Areas of More Intensive Rural Development (LAMIRD) Matrix
Mixed Use High Federal Fundm C� vcles
Type of Growth UGA Criteria Apply Density PSRC- managed Transportation
(per GMA) Residential with Funding Centers & Corridors
Jobs
Incorporated UGA Urban Yes Yes N/A
Unincorporated UGA Urban Yes Yes N/A
PSRC Centers Regional
• Regional Urban Yes Yes Competitive
• Industrial /Employment Countywide
Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council Centers
Town /City Center Urban Yes Yes
Mixed Use/Neighborhood Urban Yes Yes Countywide
Employment /Activity Urban if in UGA, Rural if outside UGA Limited if not in
Transportation Hubs Urban if in UGA, Rural if outside UGA UGA
Fully Contained Communities Urban Yes Yes Countywide if designated as
Kitsa Center
Master Planned Resorts Recreational No Limited Rural set -aside **
Limited to
In -fill Existing density
LAM1RDs Consistent with No with Rural set -aside **
Existing Character no intensification
of use
Industrial in Rural Employment/Activity No No Rural set -aside **
Resource -based Industrial
Rural Non -urban No No Rural set -aside **
Rural Character
Resource Lands No Residential Growth Limited No Rural set -aside **
* Non - motorized /Enhancement Transportation Funding can be used anywhere in Kitsap County
** 10% each funding cycle, set by federal statute (199 1)
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
■■ rereseeeeererereerrereeerrrrrreeeeeeerrerreeereeesrerreeereeererrrrreererrererre .r
SUBJECT: Approval of a $25,000 grant Study Session Date ! I .2011
match to be used to fund a project manager COUNCIL MEETING Date 1 o A01 I
for the development planning and Department Exec Live
coordination of the Youth Wellness Campus Presenter Mayor Patty Lent
Phone 473 -5266
SUMMARY: A $25,000 grant match is needed to fund a project manager for the development
planning and coordination of the Youth Wellness Campus Partners in the project are Bremerton
School District, Boys & Girls Club Teen Center, Lindquist Dental Clinic for Children, Kitsap
Community Food Co -op, Farmers Market, C Keith Birkenfeld Fund of The Seattle Foundation,
Steven Holl Architects, Rice Fergus Mill Architects, Seattle University, Organization Systems
Renewal Graduate Program Total development of the campus is $19 million, creating jobs during
construction and operation as well as filling a need in our community
A one million dollar verbal commitment has been obtained from the C Keith Birkenfeld Fund of The
Seattle Foundation for this project contingent on obtaining this $25,000 grant match for the pre -
development planning
ATTACHMENTS: Youth Wellness Campus Fact Sheet
�3�, �epar�"r►�e�
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) $25,000 has been earmarked in the eve 2012
Budget
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
l
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the expenditure of $25,000 from the 2012 General Fund non -
departmental budget to assist Kitsap Community Foundation's funding of a project
manager for the development planning and coordination of the Youth Wellness Campus
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ C s t A e da XGeneral Business ❑ Public Hearing
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ 1 able ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Youth Wellness Campus
A partnership between public & private sectors to benefit the youth of Bremerton
Purpose: conversion of a Junior high into a community and youth - planned 7 -acre campus focused on improved
health, academic achievement, and nutritional activities New construction will total approximately 35,000
square feet, with another 14,000 in remodeled square feet Capital costs are expected to exceed $18 5 million
from both public and private sources
Current Partners:
City of Bremerton: leadership, project management, infrastructure upgrading, site development and demolition
of un- needed buildings
Bremerton School District: provision and maintenance of developed land and re- construction of central kitchen
supplying food for all Bremerton schools and one private school
Boys & Girls Club Teen Center: new construction of a 10,000 square foot facility for teen activities
Lindquist Dental Clinic for Children: sharing a common wall with the Boys & Girls Club, construction of a 1,500
square foot, 6- dental chair clinic for children
Kitsap Community Food Co -op: upgrade of 7,000 square foot existing brick building for a full - service,
community -owned grocery store selling local & natural food, promoting good health via its membership and
through community outreach
Farmer's Market: a 4,600 square foot space to market locally grown produce, crafts and other products focused
on health and wellness
C. Keith Birkenfeld Fund of The Seattle Foundation: a private funding partner interested in initially investing
$25,000 in pre - development planning, once a match has been secured, later, potential significant investment in
campus development
Steven Holl Architects: pro bono design of the "Wellness Center" a new 10,000 square foot facility built to
house wellness - related services for youth, chosen by youth, and if possible, managed by youth
Seattle University, Organization Systems Renewal Graduate Program: team of graduate students working with
the Campus Advisory Committee to develop a common vision for the campus, explore ways of governing the
campus, and bringing young people to the table to provide input and leadership
Progress:
• Convening and ongoing monthly meetings of the Advisory Committee
• Services of Rice Fergus Miller secured
• Site discovery & master planning completed, including utility mapping
• Preliminary planning and engineering design performed by Shea- Carr - Jewell
• Permitting discussions underway with City's Planning Dept
• Negotiations underway to hire Exeltech principal Karen Rogers to manage the project
• $2,478,000 raised for the construction of the Teen Center, capital requests pending for Lindquist Dental
Clinic for Children
STEVEN HOLLARCHITECTS I111100gZGAIA M
a i
LEGION FIELD
EXISTING GYMNASIUM
r
TO REMAIN
_ � l ..... �.. �Z
•
EXISTING SCHOOL '\ W
r • * TO BE DEMOLISHED ' N
I I f ' , •
1 .
r + �
a .
J L L
jl a, r-r -r 0.. . r r■ r r■ r r
�� I ■ i i i i ' S'CONTOURS
■
v
i r -'- - ■� ■ �_a�p ■ ■■■�,r ■■� ■ ■■■� ■ ■ter ■ r� ■ ■ ■■■� ■ ,
— WHEATON WAY -
Youth Wellness Center Bremerton, Washington SITE PLAN V=60'4
60'-0"
05 14 2010
Nam SMNF"
ti
Me mmew
Moo-Nuffm Not" Gomm AM WWNFM
� I
� I
I
g N 11
ran
p STORMWATER
z POND
° o
L
�c� A
O m J
❑
I `o
noomoN
$g
1
gg I
A 7m ® 'gym as p
� L---- - - - - --
❑ ❑
00 y
❑
FARMERS MARK PH 2 °� — ° a
5msr f " TREES
FE ties I
x EAST 30TH STREET
u °o p y
p 0000 "��up X00 "o0 � � op o
i I$ a®
Imo c®
I I4F AN a®
h
8
a t5
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
§
SHEA- CARR —JEWELL
YOUTH WELLNESS CAMPUS 6xox66xrxo.H =P.„xlxo66a
3103 CMel•OE OxrvE 3W 6106 H O YMPiq Wr19HixOTOx 98303
BREMERTON WASHINGTON i 380 - 3331309
wwwsx3uwwEWEU.com
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 7A
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeaeeeeeeeeeeeeseeoaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeaeseeeeseeeeeeseeeeeee
SUBJECT: Ordinance No 51(07 amending Study Session Date November 9, 2011
Section 3 82 020 of the BMC relating to COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
commercial parking tax Department Finance
Presenter Becky Hasart
Phone 360 -473 -5722
SUMMARY: As part of the 2012 budget, it is proposed to raise the parking tax rate from 10% to
15 %. This increase would be a direct revenue stream to the street fund and could potentially realize
an increase of $150,000 overall
This proposed ordinance was first presented as part of the budget public hearing on November 16,
2011 There were no comments received regarding this specific item
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No 5 1(a i of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington,
amending Section 3 82 020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to commercial parking tax
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) If approved, the increase to the parking tax revenue
for the street fund would be approximately $150,000
APPROVALS: -
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve Ordinance No amending Section 3 82 020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
relating to commercial parking tax
STUDY SESSION ACTION: E] Consent Agenda ❑General Business Public Hearing , ox COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
ORDINANCE NO. 51 (O
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Section 3 82 020 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code entitled relating to commercial parking
tax
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amending Section 3 82 020 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code to increase the tax relating to persons engaged in a commercial
parking business, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
SECTION]. Section 3 82 020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Tax
Rate — Who Must Pay" is hereby amended to read as follows
3.82.020 TAX RATE - WHO MUST PAY.
There is levied upon and shall be collected from every person engaged in a commercial parking
business within the City a commercial parking tax in an amount equal to *nr fifteen percent
(4 -915 %) of the gross proceeds of the commercial parking business
SECTION2. Severabdity If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect
SECTION 3. f fective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law
PASSED by the City Council the day of , 2011
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
Approved this day of , 2011
PATTY LENT, Mayor
1
Commercial Parking Tax
ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM
SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk ROGER A LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of , 2011
EFFECTIVE the day of , 2011
ORDINANCE NO
R \ Legal\ Legal \Ordmances\Finance \Commercial Parking Tax BMC 3 82 020 doc
2
Commercial Parking Tax
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
7t3
. ....................................................... ...............................
I�o . 5 17
SUBJECT: An Ordinance of the City Study Session Date November 9, 2011
Council amending BMC 3.50 relating to the COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
utility taxes for Water, Wastewater, and Department Finance
Stormwater utilities Presenter Becky Hasart
Phone 360 -473 -5722
SUMMARY: As part of the 2012 budget, it is proposed to raise the utility tax portion of PILOT on
Wastewater and Stormwater from 9 5% to 14% These changes would increase the total PILOT to
the Wastewater and Stormwater Funds from 15 5% to 20% There would be no change to the PILOT
on the Water Fund
This proposed ordinance was first presented as part of the budget public hearing on November 16,
2011 There were no comments received regarding this specific item
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No 5170 of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington,
amending Chapter 3 50 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the utility taxes for Water,
Wastewater, and Stormwater utilities
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) If approved, the $104157 revenue realized from the
increase to the Stormwater Utility would be a tax stream to the Stree+Fund (approximately
$324,044 for the entire 14 %) The $613,666 increase to the Wastewater Fund would be a tax stream
to the General Fund
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve Ordinance No 5170 amending Chapter 3 50 of the Bremerton Municipal Code
relating to the utility taxes for Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater utilities
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ Consent Agenda ❑ General Business [Public Hearing
w �
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
ORDINANCE NO. 517 O
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 3 50 of the Bremerton
Municipal Code relating to the utility taxes for water, wastewater,
and stormwater utilities
WHEREAS, current economic conditions have resulted in significantly reduced
revenue to the City's general fund; and
WHEREAS, without additional revenue the City would have to reduce essential
services below acceptable levels possibly resulting in the loss of outside revenue, and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires adequate funding for the City's essential
services; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council that as economic conditions
improve and or the City identifies alternative revenue sources the additional utility taxes
provided in this ordinance are to be reduced and or eliminated, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. Section 3.50 050 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Persons Subject to Tax — Amount" relating to utility taxes is hereby amended to read as follows-
3.50.050 PERSONS SUBJECT TO TAX — AMOUNT.
In addition to other taxes or fees that may be imposed or levied by the City, there is
hereby levied upon all persons (including the City) engaging in business within the City, a fee or
tax to be collected as follows.
(a) Gas Upon every person engaging in the business of transmitting, distributing or
the selling of manufactured or natural gas, a fee or tax equal to six (6) percent of the total gross
income from such business conducted within the City
(b) Water. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing water utility
service, a fee or tax equal to nine and one -half (9 5) percent of the total gross income from such
business conducted within the City The total gross income from the business of providing water
utility service includes the "gross income from timber sales" of the utility as that term is defined
in this chapter
(c) Wastewater. Upon every person engaging in the business of providing wastewater
utility service, a fee or tax equal to Fine and ene4i4ffourteen (94j4 ) percent of the total gross
income from such business conducted within the City
(d) Stormwater Upon every person engaging in the business of providing stormwater
utility service, a fee or tax equal to nine and eae4ielffourteen (93i4) percent of the total gross
income from such business conducted within the City.
1
2012 Utility Taxes
(e) Cable. Upon every person engaging in the business of transmitting television
signals by means of a cable distribution system commonly known as television cable service, a
fee or tax equal to seven (7) percent of the total gross income from such business conducted
within the City
(f) Solid Waste Upon every person engaging in the business of providing solid waste
collection service, a fee or tax equal to nine and one -half (9.5) percent of the total gross income
from such business conducted within the City
(g) Electricity. Upon every person engaging in the business of producing,
transmitting, distributing or selling electricity, a fee or tax equal to six (6) percent of the total
gross income from such business conducted within the City.
(h) Telephone. Upon every person engaged in carrying on a telephone business for
hire or for sale of a commodity or a service within or partly within the corporate limits of the
City, a tax for the privilege of so doing business equal to six (6) percent of the total gross income
rendered within the City
(1) Deductions In computing the telephone tax, there shall be deducted from
the gross operating revenues the following items:
(i) Amounts derived from transactions in interstate or foreign
commerce or from any business which the City is prohibited from taxing under the Constitutions
of the United States or the State of Washington.
(ii) Amounts derived from that portion of network telephone service,
as defined in RCW 82.04.065, which represents charges to another telecommunications
company, as defined in RCW 80.04.010, for connecting fees, switching charges or carver access
charges relating to intrastate toll telephone services, or for access to, or charges for, interstate
services or charges for network telephone service that is purchased for the purpose of resale
(iii) Adjustments made to a billing or to a customer account or to a
telecommunications company accrual account in order to reverse a billing or charge that had
been made as a result of third -party fraud or other crime and was not properly a debt of a
customer.
(iv) A complete deduction from gross income shall be allowed for
credit losses, only to cellular telephone service companies which keep their regular books of
account on an accrual basis, for cash discounts and credit losses actually sustained by a taxpayer
as a result of telephone service business
(2) Allocation of Income — Cellular Telephone Service
(1) Service Address. Payments by a customer for the telephone service
from telephones without a fixed location shall be allocated among taxing, jurisdictions to the
location of the customer's principal service address during the period for which the tax applies.
(ii) Roaming Phones. When the service is provided while a subscriber
is roaming outside the subscriber's normal cellular network area, the gross income shall be
assigned consistent with the taxpayer's accounting system to the location of the originating cell
site of the call, or to the location of the main cellular switching office that switched the call.
(i) Additional payment in lieu of tax fee. In addition to the fees
(9.5) pe}eent -set forth above in subsection (b) for water, subsection (c) for wastewater and
subsection (d) for stormwater, there shall be effective January 1, 2044-2012 an additional
payment in lieu of tax fee of six percent (6 %) for water, six percent (6 %) for wastewater and six
percent (6 %) for stormwater
2
2012 Utility Taxes
SECTION 2. Effective Date of Amendments. The amendments set forth in this
ordinance shall become effective January 1, 2012
SECTION 3. Severabdity If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect
SECTION 4. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the day of , 2011
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
Approved this day of , 2011
PATTY LENT, Mayor
ATTEST- APPROVED AS TO FORM.
SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of , 2011
EFFECTIVE the day of , 2011
ORDINANCE NO
R \ Legal\Legal \Ordinances\Finance\2012 Utility Taxes BMC 3 50 050 doc
r
3
2012 Utility Taxes
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON "7C
CITY COUNCIL
. ........................................................ ...............................
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. Study Session Date November 30, 2011
rates and fees established in Ordinance No. COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
5132. (Water rate increase) Department Finance
Presenter Becky Hasart
Phone 360 -473 -5722
SUMMARY: As part of the 2012 budget, it is proposed to raise the water rates by 6% This increase
would be a direct revenue stream to the water operations and maintenance fund and could
potentially realize additional revenue of about $473,000
For the average customer, this would equate to about a $102 increase per month (or $12 24 for the
year) Exact bills may vary depending on the customer's water usage
There is no proposed increase in the wastewater or stormwater rates
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No 1 of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington,
amending rates and fees established in Ordinance No. 5132 regarding rates and fees relating to the
Department of Public Works and Utilities for water, wastewater, stormwater and other related
services
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) If approved, the increase to the water revenue for
the water operations and maintenance fund would be approximately $473,000
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
F _
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve Ordinance No j flgof the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington,
amending rates and fees established in Ordinance No. 5132
by
Gam.
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ Coosent Agenda ❑ General Business Ypublic Heanng
c �
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Action
Form Updated 4/18/2011
ORDINANCE NO. 51
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending rates and fees established in
Ordinance No 5132 regarding rates and fees relating to the
Department of Public Works and Utilities for water, wastewater,
stormwater and other related services
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the rates and fees established in
Ordinance No 5132 by this ordinance, NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. Rate Tables established Rates and fees for services relating to the
Department of Public Works and Utilities for water, wastewater, stormwater and other related
services, as established in Ordinance No 5132, are hereby amended and reestablished as set
forth in the rates tables attached hereto as Exhibit A, incorporated herein by reference
SECTION 2. Rate Tables - Effective date The rate tables as amended and set
forth in Exhibit A shall be effective January 1, 2012
SECTION 3. Severabilgy If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect
SECTION 4. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this
day of , 2011
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
Approved this day of , 2011
PATTY LENT, Mayor
1
2012 Utilities Rates and Fees
t
APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST
ROGER A LUBOVICH, City Attorney Shannon L Corin, Interim City Clerk
PUBLISHED the day of , 2011
EFFECTIVE the day of , 2011
ORDINANCE NO
R \L.egal\L.egal \ordmances\Pubhc Works & Unitnes\2012 Rate Ordmance\2012 Utilities Fees ord doe
2
2012 Utilities Rates and Fees
Exhibit A
ASSESSMENTS, RATES, FEES, AND CHARGES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2011
Within Outside
City Limits City Limits
GENERAL FACILITY CHARGES
Water (per Meter Size)
5/8" x 3/4" $ 2,51100 $ 2,51100
V $ 6,27600 $ 6,27600
l 1/2" $ 12,554 00 $ 12,554 00
2" $ 20,084 00 $ 20,084 00
Greater than 2" Calculated based on usage Calculated based on usage
Wastewater (per ERU) $ 3,80100 $ 3,80100
Stormwater (per ISU) $ 1,01900 N/A
CONNECTIONANSPECTION FEES
Water Connection Fees
5/8" x 3/4" $ 2,05500 $ 3,08250
1" $ 2,22100 $ 3,33150
1 1/2" $ 4,35700 $ 6,53550
2" $ 4,53600 $ 6,80400
Greater than 2" Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Field Inspection Fees
Water main extensions (per foot) $ 129 $ 194
but not less than $ 47700 $ 71550
Pump Station $ 62900 $ 94350
Miscellaneous (per hour) $ 5300 $ 7950
Wastewater Connection Fees
Lateral Connection at P/L $ 5200 $ 6000
Lateral Connection at Main $ 30800 $ 35400
Conveyance Facility Ext (Per Foot) $ 170 $ 196
but not less than $ 37100 $ 42700
Pump Station $ 61700 $ 71000
Miscellaneous (per hour) $ 5200 $ 6000
1 of 8
Within Outside
City Limits City Limits
RETAIL WATER SERVICE RATES
General Service - Monthly Service Charge
Meter Size
5/8 x 3/4 inches 1 07.4 $ 1138 $ 16 1 . $ 1707
1 inch $ 12 27 $ 1301 $ ISM $ 1952
1 1/2 inch $ 17-44 $ 1849 $ 2616 $ 2774
2 inch $ 2343 $ 2484 $ 33i3 $ 3726
3 inch $ -44 49 $ 4712 $ -6662 $ 7068
4 inch $ 8262 $ 8758 $ 1 2993 $ 13137
6 inch $ 29376 $ 31139 44064 $ 46709
8 inch $--- 1,073 -04 $ 1,13742 $-1 689-56 $ 1,70613
10 inch $ -3,82 04 $ 4,05666 $-x66 $ 6,08499
12 inch S 14,397 10 $ 15,250 33 $- 21,580 65 $ 22,875 50
Residential Commodity Charge (per HCF)
0 - 10 HCF /Month $ 1- $ 123 $ 1-74 $ 1 85
Over 10 HCF/Month % 1-34 $ 139 $ 19; $ 209
Non - Residential Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 1-26 $ 134 $ 189 $ 201
Fire Protection - Monthly Service Charge
Service Size
I inch % 1S 29 $ 1939 $ 27 4. $ 2909
1 1/2 inch $ 2759 $ 2918 $1-30 $ 43 77
2 inch % 3370 $ 3794 $ $3 -fi`� $ 5691
3 inch $ 3944 $ 4181 % so ,& $ 6272
4 inch $ 42-99 $ 4557 % 64 49L $ 6836
6 inch $ 33-63 $ 5687 % 9049 $ 8531
8 inch $ 71-;2 $ 7571 $ 107 I3 $ 11357
10 inch $ 0006 $ 10596 $ 1 4004 $ 15894
12 inch $ 14280 $ 15137 $ 21420 $ 22706
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 263 $ 268 $ 3 $ 402
- For Usage Other Than Firefighting
Low- Income Senior and Low - Income Disabled Citizen - Monthly Service Charge
Base Charge (per account) $ 10 74 $ 1138 $ 16 14. $ 1707
Commodity Charge
0 - 5 HCF /Month No Charge No Charge
5 - 10 HCF/Month 1-16 $ 1 23 $ 1-74 $ 1 85
Over 10 HCF/Month $ 1_31 $ 1 39 $ IT. $ 209
Temporary/Construction Meter
1" Meter
Deposit $ 30000 $ 30000
Base Fee (per month) $ 1227 $ 1841
Set Up Fee $ 11200 $ 11200
Hydrant meter (3" Meter)
Deposit $ 2,00000 $ 2,00000
Base Fee (per month) $ 4445 $ 6668
Set Up Fee $ 11200 $ 11200
Equipment Loss/Damage Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 126 $ 1 34 $ 1-89 $ 201
2 of 8
Within Outside
City Limits City Limits
RETAIL WATER SERVICE RATES (cont'd)
City Parks and Recreation Dept - Irrigation
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 8-69 $ 067
Gold Mountain Golf Course Complex - Irrigation
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 8-86 $ 090
3 of 8
Within Outside
City Limits City Limits
RETAIL WASTEWATER SERVICE RATES
Monthly Service Charge
Single Family
Base Charge (per account) $ 3126 $ 3595
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 4 19 $ 482
Duplex on 1 Meter or 2 Bldgs on 1 Meter
Base Charge (per unit) $ 2476 $ 2847
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 419 $ 482
Multi - Family
Base Charge (per unit) $ 2476 $ 2847
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 419 $ 482
Low - Income Senior and Low - Income Disabled Citizen
Base Charge (per account) $ 1939 $ 2230
Commodity Charge (per HCF)
0 - 5 HCF/Month No charge No charge
Over 5 HCF/Month $ 419 $ 482
Commercial I
Base Charge (per account) $ 4621 $ 53 14
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 432 $ 497
Commercial II
Base Charge (per account) $ 4701 $ 5406
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 676 $ 777
Commercial III
Base Charge (per account) $ 4655 $ 53 53
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 5 53 $ 636
Beverage Production
Base Charge (per account) $ 4701 $ 5406
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 439 $ 505
Commercial Fountains - Separately Metered
Base Charge (per account) $ 4621 $ 53 14
Commodity Charge (per HCF) $ 143 $ 164
Septage Disposal (per gallon of tank capacity) $ 023 $ 023
Leachate Per Gallon of Tank Capacity $ Oil $ oil
Individual Residential Grinder Pumps
Grinder Pump Surcharge $ 1000 $ 1250
Low - Income Senior and Low- Income Disabled
Grinder Pump Surcharge $ 750 $ 1000
4of8
Within Outside
City Limits City Limits
RETAIL STORMWATER RATES
Monthly Service Charge
Residential I (Single Family /Duplex)
Base Charge (per account) $ 867 N/A
i
Exception Duplex
with 2 Meters (per account) $ 437 N/A
Residential II
Base Charge (per ISU) + 50% of the Base Charge $ 1301 N/A
Residential III
Base Charge (per ISU) + 100% of the Base Charge $ 1734 N/A
Commercial I
Base Charge (per ISU) $ 867 N/A
Commercial II
Base Charge (per ISU) + 50% of the Base Charge $ 1301 N/A
Commercial III
Base Charge (per ISU) + 100% of the Base Charge $ 1734 N/A
Public School Districts (per account) $ 867 N/A
Low- Income Senior and Low- Income Disabled Citizen
Base Charge (per account) $ 529 N/A
Multi - Family & Commercial Rate Adjustment
Water Quality (per ISU) $ 096 N/A
Water Quantity (per ISU) $ 290 N/A
Stormwater Penalty
New Multi - Family & Commercial
development without on -site detention
Charge (per ISU) $ 193 N/A
5of8
Within Outside
City Limits City Limits
MISCELLANEOUS FEES AND CHARGES
Park Reservation Fee $ 5000 $ 5000
(non - refundable)
Office Services
New Account (includes water turn -on) $ 2000 $ 2000
Account Maintenance $ 500 $ 500
Past Due Notice $ 250 $ 250
Lien Recovery Charge $ 10000 $ 10000
Close Account/Meter Read/Water Service Turn-
off $ 2000 $ 2000
Field Services
Pavement Restoration Charge
(refundable, if assessed and not required)
Asphalt Patch $ 69400 $ 1,04100
Concrete Patch $ 1,24800 $ 1,87200
Asphalt Trench $ 1,58200 $ 2,37300
Concrete Trench $ 1,59800 $ 2,39700
County Road Permit N/A Cost
Wet Tapping (Water Main Only)*
3" to 10" - excluding excavation & backfill $ 2,86000 $ 4,29000
4" x 12" - excluding excavation & backfill $ 3,17900 $ 4,76850
6" x 12" - excluding excavation & backfill $ 3,584 00 , $ 5,37600
8" x 12" - excluding excavation & backfill $ 4,24700 $ 6,37050
12" x 12" - excluding excavation & backfill $ 5,48400 $ 8,22600
3" to 10" - service to property line $ 7,05100 $ 10,576 50
4" x 12" - service to property line $ 6,95200 $ 10,428 00
6" x 12" - service to property line $ 7,43000 $ 11,145 00
8" x 12" - service to property line $ 8,22200 $ 12,333 00
12" x 12" - service to property line $ 10,048 00 $ 15,072 00
Greater than -8 =*-8" 12" Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Fire Hydrant Installation*
8" x 6" and smaller - service to property line $ 8,62900 $ 12,943 50
6 "x 10" and 6 "x 12" - service to property line $ 9,57400 $ 14,361 00
Greater than " 6" x 12" Actual Time & Materials 150% of Actual Time & Materials
Water Meter Reinstallation
3/4" & 1" $ 8000 $ 8000
1 -1/2" & 2" $ 13200 $ 13200
3" and greater Actual Time & Materials Actual Time & Materials
Water Meter Reactivation $ 5000 $ 5000
Water Meter Tampering
Tampering Removal $ 25000 $ 25000
Tampering Reinstallation Actual Time & Materials Actual Time & Materials
Cross - Connection Control
Inspection $ 5600 $ 5600
6of8
Within Outside
City Limits City Limits
MISCELLANEOUS (cont'dl
Fire Service - Detector, Meter & MXU $ 43600 $ 43600
Storz Adapter $ 30400 $ 30400
Water Service Turn- off/Turn-on
(Customer Request)
Regular Hours $ 2000 $ 2000
After Hours $ 17500 $ 17500
Delinquency Notice $ 1000 $ 1000
Water Service Turn- off/Turn-on
(Delinquent Accounts)
Regular Hours $ 5000 $ 5000
After Hours $ 17500 $ 17500
Flow and Pressure Test (Uncertified)
3/4" & 1" meters only $ 5600 $ 5600
1 -1/2" & 2" meters only $ 10200 $ 10200
Larger than 2" Actual Time & Matenals Actual Time & Materials
Utility Plant Locates
Regular Hours N/C N/C
After Hours $ 19100 $ 19100
Emergency N/C N/C
Meter Test Fee (based on meter size)
3/4" & 1" $ 13200 $ 13200
1 -1/2" & 2" $ 18200 $ 18200
3" or greater Actual Time & Materials Actual Time & Materials
Engineering Services"
Plan Check Fees
Main Extensions per foot $ 029 $ 044
BUT not less than $ 24400 $ 36600
(Includes hydrants and appurtenances
and connection to water system)
Pump Stations $ 61300 $ 92000
Firelme Extension $ 9800 $ 14700
Imgation Systems $ 9800 $ 14700
System Connections $ 9800 $ 14700
Miscellaneous (per hour) $ 5200 $ 7800
7 of 8
Within Outside
City Limits City Limits
MISCELLANEOUS fcont'd)
Storm Drainage Plan Review Fees * **
Preliminary Drainage Plans
Residential Development $ 37900 N/A
Non - Residential Development $ 26200 N/A
Plus per ISU $ 1141
Final Detailed Drainage Plans
Residential Development (per lot)
0 - 20 Lots $ 4107 N/A
21 - 50 Lots $ 2967 N/A
51 - 100 Lots $ 2625 N/A
100+ Lots $ 2282 N/A
Minimum Charge $ 29100 N/A
Non - Residential Development
per ISU $ 2282 N/A
Minimum Charge $ 34900 N/A
Resubmittal Fees
First Resubmittal No Charge N/A
Subsequent Resubmittal $ 29100 N/A
Storm Drainage Inspection Fees * **
Residential Development (per lot) $ 17 12 N/A
Non - Residential Development (per ISU) $ 17 12 N/A
Minimum Charge $ 17500 N/A
Conveyance Facility Extensions (per foot) $ 091 N/A
Minimum Charge $ 34900 N/A
Unscheduled Inspections * * ** (per site visit) $ 5200 N/A
Utility/Lien Search Fee (Manual) per parcel $ 3000 $ 3000
*Pavement Restoration Charge May Also Be Assessed
** Fees include original review and one resubmittal review
Additional reviews will be charged at miscellaneous hourly rate (above)
* ** Does not apply to single family residence or duplex construction on an existing established lot
* * ** (Unscheduled inspections shall be tracked through the course of a project and billed after the final site
inspection Fees for unscheduled inspections shall be paid prior to final occupancy approval )
8of8
Page 1 of 1
Lori Smith
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10 32 AM
To City Council
Subject FW Item 7C - Proposed Amendment to Ord No 5172 Increasing Water Rates by 3% (Roy
Runyon)
Attachments Amendment to Ord 5172 Water Rates doc
Attn Council Members (FYI)
Note that printed copies of the e -mail with attachment will be provided
L
From: Roy Runyon [mailto d4bremerton @yahoo com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 10 17 PM
To: Becky Hasart, City Council
Cc: d4bremerton @yahoo corn
Subject: Amendment to Ord No 5172 increasing water rates by 3%
Becky and Council,
I'm proposing a water rate increase of 3% vs the proposed 6% Reasons to support my
amendment
1 A 3% increase DOES NOT exceed CPI
2 A 3% increase raises an additional $236,700 in revenue
3 A 3% increase generates only $36,688 less in PILOT revenue to the General Fund than does a
6% rate
increase
Please see the attachment for a detailed explanation and a revised page 129 of the budget book
- -Roy
12/7/2011
AMENDMENT TO ORD. NO. 5172
Motion:
Move to amend Ordinance No. 5172 to raise water rates by 3 %.
Impacts:
Additional revenue: $236,700. Changes to page 129 of Budget
Book included below...
Revenue:
Charges for Services: 8,837,200
Miscellaneous Revenue: 336,682
Total revenue: 9
Expenditures:
Personnel: 3,762
Supplies & Services: 3,499,580
Transfers: 2
Debt Service 723,062
Total Expenditures: 10
Revenue over (under) Expenditures: (1,001
Beginning fund balance 5,303,223
Ending fund balance: $4
*equals 15.5% PILOT of $1,421,952 and other transfer of
$768,910.
Page 1 of 1
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Wednesday, December 07, 2011 3 16 PM
To City Council
Subject FW Response to Citizen Questions - Water Rates (Otto Spieth)
Attachments 4068_001 pdf
Attn Council Members (FYI)
From: Thomas Knuckey
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 20113 09 PM
To: Patric Coxon, Lori Smith
Subject: RE. Citizen Questions - Water Rates (Otto Spieth)
Lori — please forward this e-mail to Councilwoman Robinson
The cost of service for utility customers is based on a fixed fee, and "commodity charge" which is
essentially a fee based on usage The 2004 EES Rate Study assumed residential usage at 10 CCF
(1,000 cubic feet) of water and wastewater Below is a comparison of the current fees against the 2004
projection that was included in the Review of Draft Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Utility Rate
Studies prepared by EES for the City The comparison below uses the same usage assumption (10
CCF)
Utility 2011 Rate from 2011 Actual Difference
2004 Projection
Water 2480 21 93 (2 87
Wastewater 6437 7316 879
Stormwater 925 85 75
Total $9842 $10359 $517
Individual bills for service vary based on actual usage — the customer could reduce his bill through
conservation
Other questions written on the cover of the Draft Rate Study
What infrastructure has been renewed since 2004 increase?
The City has made myriad improvements to all utilities in the past 7 years Over the past 20 -years we
expended over $50M in system upgrades to our wastewater collection and treatment systems for
compliance with state law in reducing combined sewer overflows We additionally expend on the order of
$3 — 41VI/year on a variety of capital projects in the water system to address capacity and other issues
Expenditures in our Stormwater system are similarly made annually, but to a lesser extent
Why is there stiH debt associated with Wastewater?
Please note that our CSO Program was funded by the Wastewater Fund, with 85% of all program costs
funded by ratepayers In completing the program, the City obtained funding from a variety of sources
including $26 8M in Public Works Trust Fund Loans, $2 9M in Revenue Bonds, and $8 3M from State
Revolving Fund Loans Payments will be made on this debt until approximately 2029 at which time the
debt is projected to be fully retired
12/7/2011
Sr .v c,.e 2c d{ i,U OrP-e-� L Z O ,'Z s ,d1-h* r Hwf i f s
o�c e; . y ��2zS�.✓r -ems iO iI/CA-0- -sue i7+e 12�7=eS "v R��L c-2 f3� S
-� �� r
�e S , �✓� ,.v arc) g T -r�n_e
77;',-0 y L2 e� -r-eD ftq - ✓oc �z way �rz epic , -,ic
(.t9 tf / S Ti,-2 2 •e- S i r G L C 'e J3 r r _5y C . C /� r � �� S �"G' e iJ/f TQJt uJ/f 2.ta � r �� f 5S cJ rp &,y" ro
9- b C e - r ��L / / �L.� / v zo-0 Fr ���J II S GCS �-l�� 1 b 4J7� C�CJ �Z D . ✓ C, —0 - rr*.l P " Fb r'4-'-
City of Bremerton
Review of the Draft Water, Wastewater, and
Storm wa ter Utility Rate Studies
- ! §�rm'$y'��j�°- ' '.a�� r +.'�� � v`�r�•'' "ykx" ' r., �'�' »a
Sd,� -c .e c� �-e s r. � .� s X4-130 ✓ -2 -�€ - - •~~ - - •'�
lelA -t
I
u;oI2ois S 1140tJ/ r3
G� L-e
r !t ti .
u
IL {{ 2 o c 41 .v 7`114
Presented by: Tom Gould, Principal
1e 7 - j4evs O" s - C' N .conomic and Engineering Services, Inc.
Bellevue, Washington
Summary of the
Monthly Rate Impacts Combined
Present MONTHLY BILL WITH PROPOSED RATE ADJUSTMENTS[1]
Utility Name Monthly Bill 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Water Utility $13.01 $16.91 $19.45 $21.40 $22.04 $22.70 $23.38 $24.08 $24.80
Sewer Utility 48.64 5360 6778 61.25 61 86 62.48 63.10 63.73 6437
Stormwater Utility 4.59 5.97 7.46 806 8.30 8 55 8.81 9 07 925
Combined Residential Bill $66.24 $76.39 $84.69 $90.71 $92.20 $93.73 $9629 $96.88 $98.42
Total Monthly Change $1015 $8 30 $6.02 $149 $1 53 $1 56 $1.59 $1 54
[1] - Assumes a customer billed for 10 CCF of water and wastewater - 10 CCF is typically used for rate surveys
and comparative purposes between utilities l Ai 9, y
P'-hZ
O-P G , Z'`7
Present Ave. AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL MONTHLY BILL WITH PROPOSED RATE ADJUSTMENTS [2] [3]
Utility Name Monthly Bill 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Water Utility -Ave Bill $10.32 $1342 $15 43 $1697 $1748 $1800 $1854 $19.10 $19.67
Sewer Utility -Ave Bill 3205 3526 38.08 40.36 40.76 41.17 41.58 42.00 42.42
Stormwater Utility Ave. Bill 459 597 746 806 8.30 8.55 8.81 9.07 925
Combined Residential Ave. Bill $4696 $5464 $60.96 $65.39 $6664 $67.73 $6894 $70.17 $71.34
Total Monthly Change $768 $6 32° $443 $1.15 $1.18 $1 21 $1 23 $117
[2] - An average residential in -city customer uses 6.5 CCF of water per month
[3] - An average residential In -city customer uses 6.0 CCF of sewer per month
31
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL 7r)
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeeeeteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee■
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 517 approving Study Session Date Various
and adopting the 2012 fiscal budget COUNCIL MEETING Date December 7, 2011
Department Finance
Presenter Becky Hasart
Phone 360 -473 -5722
SUMMARY: The attached ordinance represents the proposed 2012 Fiscal Budget for consideration
This ordinance reflects the discussions that have occurred during the various budget workshops held
by Council Specific items to highlight are
• An increase to the parking tax from 10% to 15%
• An increase to the utility taxes /PILOT for Wastewater and Stormwater from 15 5% to 20%
• A continuation of the utility taxes/PILOT for Water at 15 5%
• An increase to the water rates of 6%
• Salaries and Wages remain at the same levels as 2011 (no COLAs)
• Staff reductions of 24A FTEs from 2011 levels, and
• A 1 % increase to the property tax/EMS collections
If adopted, nee would become effective January 1, 2012
+It -e. k b+.►�
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 5 173 of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington,
approving and adopting the budget for the City of Bremerton for the fiscal year 2012, and approving
the amounts set forth in each fund in accordance with RCW 35 33 075
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) Total 2012 budget for all funds is $130,434,561
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR
MAYOR
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve Ordinance No 5a? of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington,
approving and adopting the budget for the City of Bremerton for the fiscal year 2012, and approving
the amounts set forth in each fund in accordance with RCW 35 33 075
STUDY SESSION ACTION: ❑ Con ent Agenda El General Business Public Hearing
� 1
COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑Deny able ❑Continue ❑ No Action
ORDINANCE NO. 5
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, approving and adopting the budget for the
City of Bremerton for the fiscal year 2012, and appropriating the
amounts set forth in each fund in accordance with RCW 35.33.075
WHEREAS, State law, Chapter 35.33 RCW requires the City to adopt an annual budget
and provides procedures for the filing of estimates, a preliminary budget, deliberations, public
hearings, and final fixing of the budget; and
WHEREAS, a preliminary budget for the fiscal year 2012 has been prepared and filed in
the Office of the City Clerk for the City of Bremerton; public hearings have been held for the
purposes of fixing the final City Budget; and the City Council has deliberated and has made
adjustments and changes deemed necessary and proper; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the 2012 Annual Budget for the City of Bremerton,
Washington, on file in the office of the City Clerk, covering the period from January 1, 2012,
through December 31, 2012, with regular revenues and unencumbered fund balances of
$130,434,561 and expenditures and ending fund balances of $130,434,561 is hereby approved
and adopted, and the respective amounts provided for in said budget for the several funds of the
City of Bremerton are hereby fixed and adopted as follows:
General Fund (001)
City Council $ 332,770
Executive 370,360
Financial Services 1,156,840
Legal 1,004,450
Human Resources 333,210
Community Development 1,415,736
Municipal Court 1,294,187
City Auditor 170,960
Law Enforcement 9,505,637
Fire/Emergency Medical 8,318,014
Police/Fire Pension 2,544,000
1
2012 Budget
General Facilities 807,117
General Parks 2,448,241
Engineering 2,134,928
Non - Departmental 3,526,171
Ending Fund Balance 2,236,656
Total General Fund $ 37,599,277
Arterial Street (101) 4,904,100
Street (102) 2,357,048
Contingency Reserve (103) 232,745
Lodging Tax (104) 465,312
Parking System (105) 1,695,541
Community Development Block Grant (106) 2,918,090
Abatement Revolving (108) 219,371
Police Special Projects (I 10) 969,205
Public Access Television (113) 527,335
Gift & Donations Fund (114) 82,970
Trial Improvement (116) 60,643
One Percent For Arts (117) 53,873
Conference Center Operating (120) 1,795,493
Bond Fund (201) 735,135
2010 LTGO (203) 706,289
2010 UTGO/LTGO - B (203) 552,846
Park Plaza Construction (305) 110,319
Park Plaza Phase 11 (306) 4,089,802
General Government Capital Improvement (308) 565,941
Park Facilities Construction (3 10) 1,689,308
Evergreen Park Remediation (311) 210,551
Lower Wheaton Way (33 1) 1,610,160
Water Utility (40 1) 14,713,805
Water Capital (404) 1,677,500
Wastewater Utility (45 1) 22,931,409
Wastewater Capital (454) 4,865,000
Stormwater Utility (481) 4,881,145
Gorst Creek Watershed (482) 451,424
Stormwater Capital (484) 1,421,000
Gold Mountain Golf Complex (407) 2,392,297
Risk Management (503) 3,580,272
Employment Security (506) 311,105
Accumulated Leave Liability (507) 248,700
2
2012 Budget
Equipment Rental Reserve — Operations & Maintenance (509) 1,762,928
Equipment Rental Reserve — Equipment Reserves (5 10) 5,952,590
Information Services (511) 1,094,032
Total All Funds $ 13 0 9 4 3 4 9 ,561
SECTION 2. That the totals for the funds noted in Section 1 above and as set
forth in the official "City of Bremerton 2012 Annual Budget" adopted herem, are hereby
appropriated for the fiscal year 2012.
SECTION 3. Effective January 1, 2012, the annual compensation of the
Municipal Court Judge shall be $134,625.00 which is 95% of the District & Superior Court
salaries as established on September 1, 2011
SECTION 4. Effective January 1, 2012, the "management, professional,
confidential & fiduciary" pay plans shall not receive a cost of living adjustment over the 2011
pay rates.
SECTIONS. Effective January 1, 2012, the base salary of the Mayor shall be
$122,425 00 which represents no increase over the 2011 base salary.
SECTION 6. Nothing contained herem shall be construed to require the City of
Bremerton or its officers to fill any vacancy in any of the positions established by this ordinance
resulting from the discharge, resignation or retirement of such employee. Nothing herein
contained shall require the City of Bremerton or its officers to pay the maximum amount
budgeted for any position shown therein.
SECTION 7. Severabilcty. If any one or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 8. Effective Date This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the day of , 2011
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
3
2012 Budget
Approved this day of 2011
PATTY LENT, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the day of , 2011
EFFECTIVE the day of , 2011
ORDINANCE NO.
4
2012 Budget
ATTACHIvlENT A
2012 EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS
2012
SUPPLIES & DEBT CAPITAL ENDING TOTAL
FUND PERSONNEL SERVICES SERVICE OUTLAY TRANSFERS FUND BAL. BUDGET
General Fund
General Government:
City Council 313,500 19,270 332,770
Executive 283,500 86,860 370,360
Financial Services 888,400 268,440 1,156,840
Legal Department 836,600 167,850 1,004,450
Human Resources 204,900 128,310 333,210
Community Development 1,062,700 353,036 1,415,736
Municipal Court 876,600 417,587 1,294,187
City Auditor 163,700 7,260 170,960
Law Enforcement 8,089,500 1,416,137 9,505,637
Fire./Emergency Medical 7,444,000 874,014 8,318,014
Police & Fire Pension 2,320,000 224,000 2,544,000
General Facilities 201,800 550,317 55,000 807,117
General Parks 1,734,200 713,301 740 2,448,241
Engineering 1,906,900 228,028 2,134,928
Non - Departmental 2,325,606 410,565 790,000 3,526,171
Ending Fund Balance 36,656 2,236 656
Total General Fund 26,326,300 7,780,016 411,305 55,000 790,000 2,236,656 37,599,277
Special Revenue Foods -
Arterial Street 4,904,100 0 4,904,100
Street 1,009,300 1,222,187 125,561 2,357,048
Contingency Reserve 232,745 232,745
Lodging Tax 230,000 155,000 80,312 465,312
Parking System 616,233 675,705 403,603 1,695,541
Comm Dev Block Grant 1",200 2,400,775 318,115 2,918,090
Abatement Revolvmg Fund 42,000 177,371 219,371
Police Special Pnglects 359,700 50,000 559,505 969,205
Public Access Television 239,700 37,154 35,000 25,000 190,481 527,335
Gift & Donations Fund 29,600 5,000 48,370 82,970
Trial Improvement 15,000 45,643 60,643
One Percent for Arts 500 10,000 43,373 53,873
Conference Center Oper 1,543,157 252,336 1,795,493
Total Spec. Rev Funds 1,448200 6,496,306 675,705 4,999,100 185,000 2,477,415 16281,726
Debt Service Fund
Bond Fund 718,250 16,885 735,135
2010 LTGO 551,880 154,409 706289
2010 UTGO/LTGO (B) 520 32,071 552 846
Total Debt Service Fund 0 0 1,790,905 0 0 203,365 1,994270
Capital Improvement Funds:
Park Plaza 109,600 719 110,319
Park Plaza Phase II 4,089,802 0 4,089,802
General Govt Capital Improv 332,500 233,441 565,941
Park Facilities Construction 5,700 1,310,000 373,608 1,689,308
Evergreen Park Remodnation 82,500 128,051 210,551
Lower WhCat0n Way 1,610135 25 1,610160
Total Capital Improv. Funds 0 0 5,700 7202,037 332,500 735,844 8276,081
ATTACHMENT A
2012 EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS
2012
SUPPLIES & DEBT CAPITAL ENDING TOTAL
FUND PERSONNEL SERVICES SERVICE OUTLAY TRANSFERS FUND BAL. BUDGET
Enterprise Fonds
wow Utility 3,762,140 3,499,580 723,062 2,227,550 4,501,473 14,713,805
Water Capes 1,600,000 77,500 0 1,677,500
Wastewater Utility 2,651,990 4,060,116 2,823,563 7,180,043 6,215 697 22,931,409
Wa Capes 4,865,000 0 4,865,000
StomrwaterUtility 856,530 1,013,487 14,993 1,237,920 1,758,215 4,881,145
Gorst Creek Watershed 344,979 106,445 451,424
Stomp Capri 1,421,000 0 1,421,000
Gold Mountain Golf Complex 1,812 285 ,705 70,000 224 2,392 97
Total Enterprise Funds 7,270,660 10,730,416 3,847,323 7,956,000 10,723,013 12,806,168 53,333,580
Internal Service Fonds
Risk Management 240,000 1,189,900 2,150,372 3,580,272
Employment Sectmty 311,105 0 311,105
Accumulated Leave Liability 248,700 0 248,700
ER&R Operations & Maud 439,500 1,151,725 171,703 1,762,928
ER&R. Equipment Reserves 515,400 5,437,190 5,952,590
Information Services 536,900 355,114 60,000 142,118 1094 032
Total Internal Service Funds 1,776,105 2,696,739 0 575,400 0 7,901,383 12,949,627
Total Non - General Foods 10,494.965 19,923 6,319 20 732 537 11 24,124,175 92
Total All Foods 36 821,265 27 1 6 20 787 537 12 26 130
Expenditures - All Funds
Transfers
$12,030,513 Ending Fund
Capital Outlay 8% Balance
$20,787,537 $26,360,831
16% 20%
Debt Service Personnel
$6,730,938 $36,821,268
5% 29%
Supplies & Services
$27,703,477
21%
ATTACHN EENf A
2012 REVENUE SOURCES - ALL FUNDS
BEG LIC. INTER- CHARGES FINES 2012
FUND AND GOVT FOR AND OTHER TOTAL
FUND BAL, TAXES PERMITS REVENUE SERVICE FORFEITS REVENUE BUDGET
General Fond
General Government -
City Council 108,233 108,233
Executive 135,096 135,096
Financial Services 2,809,400 416,425 342,320 3,568,145
Legal 414,241 414,241
Human Resources 108,376 108,376
Community Development 288,300 10,000 303,147 601,447
Municipal Court 2,487 453,900 503,830 39,700 999,917
City Auditor 55,605 55,605
Law Enforcement 2,400 530,811 295,300 8,900 8,750 846,161
Fue'Emergency Medical 1,270,000 1,000 121,750 643,450 1,000 2,037,200
Police & Fire Pension 49,600 49,600
General Facilities 187,079 46,080 233,159
Parks 393,580 73,000 466,580
Engineering 65,000 1,819,723 1,884,723
Non - Departmental 17,889,500 144,500 503,000 850 620,000 4,683,829 23,841,679
Beginning Fund Balance 2,249,115 2,249115
Total General Farad 2,249,115 21,968,900 917,625 1,217,648 5,26(1,900 1,133,730 4,851,359 37,599,277
Special Revenue Funds-
Arterial Street 546,656 4,357,444 4,904,100
Street 99,804 454,800 820,400 205,000 777,044 2,357,048
Contingency Reserve 117,745 115,000 232,745
Lodging Tax 85,212 380,000 100 465,312
Parking System 540,041 500 300,000 855,000 1,695,541
Comm Dev Block Grant 390,453 2,488,311 30,000 9,326 2,918,090
Abatement Revolving Fund 212,871 5,500 1,000 219,371
Police Special Projects 863,205 31,000 75,000 969,205
Public Access Television 190,695 240,000 17,000 78,040 1,600 527,335
Gift & Donations Fund 65,610 1,000 16,360 82,970
Trial Improvement 38,643 22,000 60,643
One Percent for Arts 53,433 440 53,873
Conference Center Oper 310,003 1,321,490 164,000 1,795 493
Total Spec. Rev. Fonds 3,514,371 834,800 240,000 7,705,155 1,641,530 331,000 2,014,870 16,281,726
Debt Service Fund•
Bond Fund 152,235 355,400 227,500 735,135
2010 LTGO 204,244 330,000 121,270 50,775 706,289
2010 UTGO/LTGO (B) 29 412,800 37,675 73 552,846
Total Debt Service Fund 385,700 1,098,200 0 158,945 0 0 351,425 1,994,270
Capital Improvement Farms
Park Plaza 110,319 110,319
Park Plaza Phase 11 1,342,052 2,366,420 170,000 211,330 4,089,802
General Govt Capital impov 185,141 380,000 800 565,941
Park Facilities Construction 719,308 745,000 225,000 1,689,308
Evergreen Park Remediabon 149,301 60,750 500 210,551
Lower Wheaton Way 242,076 1,W,084 1,610,160
81
Total Capital Improv. Fads 2,748,197 380,000 0 4,540,254 170,000 0 437,630 8,276,0
ATTACHMENT A
2012 REVENUE SOURCES - ALL FUNDS
BEG LIC. INTER- CHARGES FINES 2012
FUND AND GOVT FOR AND OTHER TOTAL
FUND BAL TAXES PERMITS REVENUE SERVICE FORFEITS REVENUE BUDGET
Eaterprise Funds
Water Utility 5,303,223 9,073,900 336,682 14,713,805
Water Capital 0 500,000 1,177,500 1,677,500
Wastewater Utility 9,294,397 13,609,512 27,500 22,931,409
Wastewater Capes 0 4,865,000 4,865,000
Stormwater Utility 2,566,545 2,302,000 12,600 4,881,145
Gorst Creek Watershed 147,918 303,406 100 451,424
Stormwater Capital 0 1,421,000 1,421,000
Gold Mountain Golf Complex 353 1,950,000 89,000 2,392,297
Total Enterprise Funds 17,665,380 0 0 303,406 27,435,412 0 7,929,382 53,333,580
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management 2,150,372 1,429,900 3,580,272
Employment Security 63,705 247,400 311,105
Accumulated Leave Liability 0 248,700 248,700
ER&R Operations & Mamt. 179,168 1,581,760 2,000 1,762,928
ER&R Equipment Reserve 5,864,431 88,159 5,952,590
Information Services 365,532 728 500 1,094,032
Total Internal Service Fonds 8,623,208 0 0 0 2,310,260 0 2,016,159 12,949,627
Total Non - General Funds 32 856 2,313,000 240,000 12 707 760 31 557 02 331,000 12,749 466 92,835 84
Total All Farads 35 185,971 24 81 1 13 925 408 36 818,102 1,464 730 17 130 434,561
Revenue Sources - All Funds
Fines & Forfeits per Revenue
Charges for Service $1,684,730 $17,600,82.5
$38,818,102 93%
28%
Beginning Fund
Balance
$35,185,971
Intergovernmental 27%
$13,925,608
11% Licenses & Permits Taxes
$1,157,625 $24,281,900
19%
1%
Page 1 of 1
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Wednesday, December 07, 2011 11 17 AM
To City Council
Subject FW Budget Follow Up - Streets Fund
Attachments 2012 Street Fund Budget Recommendation Concerns doc, City of Bremertontypical paving
operation doc
Attn Council Members
I was requested by a Council Member to resend these attachments for your consideration
Please note this e-mail was originally forwarded on November 15, so hopefully you all have a printed
copy in your Budget Books, but additional printed copies will again be available
L
From: Christine Grenier On Behalf Of City Council
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011132 PM
To: Colen Corey
Subject: Budget Follow Up - Streets Fund
Thank you, Colen for the additional information on Streets
I have forwarded your email to the Council Members for their review and consideration
Christine Grenier
Council /Auditor Assistant ,
City of Bremerton
(360) 473 -5280
From: Colen Corey
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 101 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Budget
I have more information upon request
Thank you,
Colen Corey
12/7/2011
City of Bremerton
Typical Paving Operation
Labor Matrix 2008
• Traffic control and ground labor -- 4 Temporary
employees
• John Biehl— Roller Operator (3014)
• Colen Corey —Paver Operator (3105)(3004)
• Scott Corey – Paver Operator (3105)
• Terry Devery – Asphalt Raker (3022)
• Zach Lounsberry – Asphalt Raker
• Ghyrn Hobson – Truck Driver (3106) (3010- Tack
Truck)
• Tony Hough – Truck Driver (3093)
• Mike Hart – Truck Driver (3091) & Haul Paver
• Jim Iovinelli – Truck Driver (3092)
• John Corey – Truck Driver (3069)
• 10 FTEs and 4 temporary seasonal employees
• Typically haul 200 to 400 ton 1 /2" HMA per day depending
on fob quantity required.
• Typically some limited pre - leveling required for 2" overlay
• Same amount of employees needed for grinding operation
• 1 or 2 passes at curb with grinder depending on street profile
• Asphalt removal with hack hammer at utility castings and
immediate curb face
• Extensive clean up required after grinding
2012 Street Fund Budget Recommendation Concerns
To help identify my credentials I have held the Operations Manager position, Street
Supervisor, Street Lead and Street specialist positions with knowledge of the
operational equipment from paving machines to dump trucks. I feel very qualified
to make these statements sticking to the facts and putting my reputation of 27 years
working in the Operations of this Department. This report does not include the
Electronics division of Public Works.
• The City Council meeting of November 9 th was not informative enough to
give details of all the facts.
• In 2008 the Street Division had 13 FTE's with an additional 9 part time
seasonal employees. The 2012 proposed budget only has 6 FTE's and no
seasonal employee's.
• Paving operations can not be sustained with such a minimal work force.
• The 2008 budget was supported by 42,637 man hours, the 2012 proposed
budget only supports 12,480 hours approximately 70 % reduction.
• The $367 K budget line item for supplies can not be utilized by only 6 FTE's
the required staffing for a paving operation would be 10 FTE's & 4 seasonal.
• From 1995 to 2008 the Street Division paved approximately 26 miles,
equalling roughly 53,340 tons at average cost of $77.00 per ton in place. The
average cost per ton in place today by vendors would be approximately
• Street Division in addition to paving has the responsibility for sidewalk
restoration, vegetation removal, guard rails, fences, pavement markings,
grading of alleys, pot holes, tripping hazards, removal hazardous trees, road
shoulder maintenance, signs and more. The majority of these tasks are
necessary to be performed within a 5 month (May to September) window.
• Emergency services to the citizens of Bremerton will be strained with only 6
FTE's within the Street Division to respond to such activities as winter
storms for snow removal, flooding, mud slides, wind storms.
• In closing, paving operations can not happen in this proposed budget with
the allotted man power, the sign infrastructure & pavement markings are in
jeopardy, delays in emergency services can be anticipated. These cuts are
very deep and the liability to the city is great.
Page 1 of I
— �-
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Tuesday, December 06, 2011 10 19 AM
To 'Sherlock Bill'
Subject RE Employee Comment on Budget - Delay Job Losses (William Rieger)
Importance High
From: Sherlock Bill [mailto'sherlockbdl @yahoo com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 12 05 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Job losses
Dear Council members
I know it has been a difficult time dealing with the budget and where to cut I am not sure of all
the options available to the Council, but it would be nice if some kind of extention could be
made for the current work force With all that is coming up such as union contract negotiations,
bad weather, year end work, and inability to hire temps to help out, it makes sense to maintain
the personnel we have in the positions they are in at least till February I hope this is something
you will consider
Sincerely,
William L Rieger
PO Box 2423
Bremerton, Wa 98310 -0317
360 - 377 -8443
12/6/2011
Page 1 of 1
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Tuesday, December 06, 2011 10 00 AM
To City Council
Subject FW December 7 - Request to Comment on Budget Discussion (Robert Eldred)
Attachments Agenda pdf
Mr Eldred,
Thank you for your letter, which I have forwarded to the City Council Members for their review and
consideration It is appreciated that you wish to express your support for Ms Peterson
I have attached an agenda for the meeting on December 7 Please be aware that all comments
pertaining to an item on the agenda must wait until that item is opened for discussion The subject you
refer to will be a part of the budget discussion, which is Item 7D
Thank you,
Lori Smith
11&"
Legislative Assistant
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473 -5280
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From Robert Eldred [mailto rleldred @comcast net]
Sent Sunday, December 04, 20113 02 PM
To City Council
Subject Council meeting on 12/7
A group of members from the Bremerton Senior Center will be attending the Council meeting at 5 30 on
Wednesday 12/7 We will be supporting the retention of Holly Pedersen's position at the Senior Center
We would like to have a chance to speak on her behalf at the meeting Consider this e-mail as a request
to put us on the docket Thanks for your help
Robert Eldred
317 Shore Dr
(360) 479 -3309
rleldred @comcast net
12/6/2011
Page 1 of 1
i r
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Tuesday, December 06, 2011 9 44 AM
To City Council
Subject FW FW Citizen Concern - Support for Holly Peterson /Senior Center Budget Cuts (Charles "Tony"
Neal)
From: tonyneal @earth I ink net [mailto tonyneal @earthlink net]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 20114 48 PM
To: Parks
Subject: Bad Mistake
Dear Commission Members,
Hope It's not true that you are considering or have already decided to end Holly
Peterson's fob as Director of the Senior Center To me, this would be a big mistake
Visit it sometime, see how busy it is Releasing the paid director and letting volunteers
(who in other areas, do excellent work)
run the Center is NUTS'
Please reconsider'
Charles "Tony" Neal
Senior Center user
p s I'd be happy to point out some budget areas that are inefficient or duplicative orjust
overall unnecessary
12/6/2011
Page 1 of 2
MOIL
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council LJ
Sent Monday, December 05, 2011 10 29 AM
To City Council
Subject FW Response to Employee Comment - Traffic Signal Work (Robby Charvat)
Attn Council (FYI)
Additional comment
From: Robby Charvat
Sent: Monday, December 05, 20117 36 AM
To: City Council
Subject: RE Response to Employee Comment - Traffic Signal Work (Robby Charvat)
Thank you so much for your reply So dust to let everyone know, the electronic shop has 2 state licensed
electricians and 2 technicians One FTE technician and % of an electrician are dedicated to Water
Resources, the other %2 of that electrician is dedicated to the tunnel That only leaves us with one FTE to
perform all of the street lights, traffic signal, facilities, parks, locates, and pole transfers and much more
So I am happy to here that you are looking to try and keep all four of us Once again Thank you very
much for your time
From: Lori Smith On Behalf Of City Council
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 1:19 PM
To: City Council
Subject: FW Response to Employee Comment - Traffic Signal Work (Robby Charvat)
Attn Council Members (FYI)
From: Will Maupin [madto.Will.Maupin @comcast net]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 12 59 PM
To: City Council, Becky Hasart
Subject: RE Employee Comment - Traffic Signal Work (Robby Charvat)
I had a discussion with another electronics tech The mayor's budget would reduce the number of techs
to two (they used to have eight) The Council's budget proposal will increase the number of techs to
three
Since one and a half FTEs are dedicated to water systems, only one and a half FTEs are available to
work on street lights, etc I suggest that we increase the number to four The additional position can be
funded out of the amount we have designated for material Without personnel, we cannot use the
material
I also think we should add personnel back into streets We have added money from stormwater PILOT to
pay for material for streets but will not have enough people to do paving
Will
From: Lori Smith [madto Lori Smith @ci bremerton wa us] On Behalf Of City Council
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 20114 13 PM
12/5/2011
Page 2 of 2
To: Robby Charvat
Subject: FW Employee Comment - Traffic Signal Work (Robby Charvat)
Robby,
Thank you for your e-mail, which I will share with the Council Members for their consideration
Lori Smith
.4 , oi.
Legislative Assistant
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473 -5280
From: Robby Charvat
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 20114 12 PM
To: Lori Smith
Subject: Traffic Signal Work
It has been brought to my attention that some one has told City of Bremerton council members that only one
person performs traffic signal work I would like to set this statement true Everyone in the electronics shop works
on and is on call for the traffic signals assigned to the City of Bremerton as well as the contracts we have to
maintain Poulsbo and the State signals We all are traffic signal techs and all carry at least the minimum
certifications to work on and operate traffic signals I dust wanted all of you to be aware of this and be educated
that we all work on them equally Thank you for your time
Thank you,
Rob Charvat
City of Bremerton
Electrician
360 - 473 -5367
360- 473 -8905
12/5/2011
Page 1 of 2
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Friday, December 02, 2011 1 39 PM
To City Council
Subject FW Comments on City Budget (Alan Lobdell)
Attn Council Members
cc Mayor Lent, Finance Director Becky Hasart (FYI)
From: Will Maupin [mailto Will Maupin @comcast net]
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 1 10 PM
To: City Council
Subject: FW Budget
Here is an email I received from Alan Lobdell It provides his input on personnel in Public Works
I held on to this information until Alan is no longer employed by the City He gave me permission to
release it to the rest of the Council after his last day
Will
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 20119 32 AM
To: Will Maupin @comcast net
Subject: Budget
Will
I am writing this from my personal e-mail to keep it out of the main stream
I want to thank you and the other council members for your common sense look at the proposed
budget I don't believe any common sense has been used up to this time
I found out last week through my own contacts that I would not get an interview for the Public
Works Directors position That means I won't be around to see how this all works next year,
although I would have like stayed here that's ok, I've been doing this for a long time However, I
do want to see that the public is taken care of, as public works is suppose to be doing
The positions that are being considered for reinstatement are badly needed to maintain a working
department
Water division - 3 in O & M
2 in billing
1 in customer service, phone response
Streets - 1 elec tech Really hope to get both back
Engineering - 1 Engineer Hopefully the CE 111 position that was eliminated
12/5/2011
Page 2 of 2
My suggestion is that in Engineering we need a CElll to be able to come in and already be
knowledgeable of the stormwater regulations and hit the ground running to get us up to speed In streets
we really need the four elec personnel to keep all city electronics running smoothly
Yes, that means bringing back 9 personnel and it will be hard to work out the costs but the department
simply cannot handle losing 22 positions and 17 bodies We can make it with these 9
By the way, if the water rate is raised by 3, 5 6, or 9 percent it also raises PILOT and creates more
money to pay for some of the positions
One question of you' What has happened in the past that has given Becky and the Mayor such a dislike
for public works They have told me over and over that the people in public works don't do anything)
Becky has told me at least a half dozen times the water division is inefficient and the Mayor has told me
several time the engineers and electricians don't really do anything
12/5/2011
Page 1 of 1
Lori Smith
From Patty Graf -Hoke [grafhoke @visitkitsap com]
Sent Wednesday, December 07, 2011 4 51 PM
To City Council
Cc diane Robinson
Subject Lodging Tax Funding Comments
Dear City Council Members
On behalf of the Kitsap Peninsula Visitor & Convention Bureau Board of Directors, the KPVCB
would like to thank'the City of Bremerton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee and City Council
members for its decision to allocat $23,000 to the KPVCB to provide marketing and tourism
promotion services to the City of Bremerton for 2012
We had hoped to attend the Bremerton Council Meeting this evening but received a last minute
request to attend a meeting at the City of Poulsbo We hope to make to Bremerton before the
end of the meeting tonight If that is not possible, we did want to thank the City Council for it's
continued support of the KPVCB and look forward to a positive and productive partnership with
the City of Bremerton and other local organizations and businesses to promote Bremerton as a
world class visitor and event destination in 2012
Best Regards,
Patricia Graf -Hoke
Executive Director
Kitsap Peninsula Visitor & Convention Bureau
360 - 908 -0088 - grafhoke @visitkitsap com
Thy
Peninsula
lie Nittlf at ule
v1 put et sourld
io
'sitar & convc neon nureav
wwrwVisdKi sap com
Official tourism site for the Kitsap Peninsula
and #1 Tourism Partner
www VisitKitsao com
9481 Silverdale Way, Suite 281, Silverdale, WA 98383
800 - 337 -0580 (phone /fax)
12/7/2011
Page 1 of 2
From: Leslie Daugs [lesliedaugsc4council @gmail com]
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 2 34 PM
To: City Council, steven gardner @kitsapsun com, pattylent @comcast net
Subject: City of Bremerton Budget 2012
Open Letter - Re City of Bremerton 2012 Budget Proposal
Since 2009, the Mayor has cut 38 employees from the City of Bremerton Not only have there
been NO cuts at the top, but administrators have received cost of living adjustments, and the
Mayor's budget has increased every year
Here we go again The Mayor has proposed a budget that cuts another 16 to 25 employees Not
cuts in administrators but the front line people that serve you Fire, Police, Water, Road, Parks,
etc Then to add insult to injury she proposes increasing her Executive Budget from $391,000 in
2011 to $415,360 in 2012
Let's cut the fat not the people that directly serve the citizens who elected us
I propose the following measures to reduce the number of layoffs required to balance the 2012
Budget for the city of Bremerton
• A five percent cut in the Mayor's Salary, Mayor's Assistant's Salary, and Mayor's Budget
from 2011
• A five percent cut in the salaries of all City Department Heads
• One furlough day a month for all city employees
These measures will save the city over a million dollars, enough to eliminate the need for ANY
layoffs We need a balanced approach not cuts to the workers that serve us
These ARE tough economic times Right - sizing Government does not mean cutting people who
work directly with and for the public without equal or larger cuts in administration
Sincerely,
Leslie Daugs, Councilperson Elect, District 2
Current Amount
Mayor's Salary $ 122,424
Mayor's Assistant *(est) $ 87,000
Mayor's Executive Budget $ 391,000
12/12/2011
Page 2 of 2
Director of Financial Services $ 135,072
City Attorney $ 141,912
Director of Community Development $ 128,568
Police Chief $ 141,912
Fire Chief $ 135,072
City Auditor $ 105,516
Director of Parks and Recreation $ 122,376
Director of Public Works and Utilities $ 135,072
City Council Salary $ 108,000
Total $ 1,753,924.00
12/12/2011
Page 1 of 1
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Thursday, December 08, 2011 2 23 PM
To 'Robin'
Subject RE Citizen Comment - Words of Support (Robin Henderson)
From: Robin [madto Robinh940138 @comcast net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 201110-12 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Please pass on my message
Lon,
Please share this message with the City Council and Mayor
I couldn't stay for the entire City Council meeting tonight, but I caught the first couple of hours I may not always
agree with everything our City Council and/or Mayor do, but I'm always impressed with their professionalism and
dedication to the fob Their patience and tolerance in dealing with the public is commendable In these tough
time please do the right thing and thank you for listening to what I have to say about it
Robin Henderson
12/8/2011
Page 1 of 1
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Wednesday, December 07, 2011 5 18 PM
To City Council
Subject FW Comments from Kitsap VCB - Lodging Tax Funding
From: Patty Graf -Hoke [mailto grafhoke @visitkitsap com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 20114 51 PM
To: City Council
Cc: diane Robinson
Subject: Lodging Tax Funding Comments
Dear City Council Members
On behalf of the Kitsap Peninsula Visitor & Convention Bureau Board of Directors, the KPVCB
would like to thank the City of Bremerton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee and City Council
members for its decision to allocat $23,000 to the KPVCB to provide marketing and tourism
promotion services to the City of Bremerton for 2012
We had hoped to attend the Bremerton Council Meeting this evening but received a last minute
request to attend a meeting at the City of Poulsbo We hope to make to Bremerton before the
end of the meeting tonight If that is not possible, we did want to thank the City Council for it's
continued support of the KPVCB and look forward to a positive and productive partnership with
the City of Bremerton and other local organizations and businesses to promote Bremerton as a
world class visitor and event destination in 2012
Best Regards,
Patricia Graf -Hoke
Executive Director
Kitsap Peninsula Visitor & Convention Bureau
360 - 908 -0088 - Qrafhoke@visitkitsap com
Peninsula
he Natut at SWlv
www VisstKasap cam
Official tourism site for the Kitsap Peninsula and #1 Tourism Partner
www VisitKitsap com
9481 Silverdale Way, Suite 281, Silverdale, WA 98383
800 - 337 -0580 (phone /fax)
12/8/2011
Page 1 of 1
Christine Grenier
From Robby Charvat
Sent Thursday, December 01, 20114 12 PM
To Lori Smith
Subject Traffic Signal Work
It has been brought to my attention that some one has told City of Bremerton council members that only
one person performs traffic signal work I would like to set this statement true Everyone in the electronics
shop works on and is on call for the traffic signals assigned to the City of Bremerton as well as the
contracts we have to maintain Poulsbo and the State signals We all are traffic signal techs and all carry
at least the minimum certifications to work on and operate traffic signals I dust wanted all of you to be
aware of this and be educated that we all work on them equally Thank you for your time
Thank you,
Rob Charvat
City of Bremerton
Electrician
360- 473 -5367
360- 473 -8905
12/29/2011
Page 1 of 1
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 10 28 AM
To: 'Mary Frances Beedle'
Subject: RE Citizen Concern - Support for Holly Peterson (Mary Frances Beedle)
Ms Beedle,
Thank you for your letter, which I have forwarded to the City Council Members for their review and
consideration I have also shared your comments with the Mayor, Finance Director, and Parks Director
for their information
It is appreciated that you took the time to express your comments and concerns
Lori Smith
110" A
Legislative Assistant
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473 -5280
From: Mary Frances Beedle [madto.dncnidybug @msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 10 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Holly Peterson
Members of the City Council of Bremerton;
I would ask that you reconsider your decision to remove Holly Peterson from her
position at the Bremerton Senior Center on 13th & Nipsic.
Holly is a definite asset to the Center and would be sorely missed. She is very
dedicated and talented in so many ways. She is a friendly, genuinely caring individual
and welcomes new members to the Center. She has a wonderful sense of humor that
puts everyone at ease and makes the time spent there at the Center most enjoyable.
Please retain Holly Peterson ............ she is needed and wanted'
Thank you for your consideration,
Mary Frances Beedle
6925 Chico Way N. W.
Bremerton, WA 98312
360- 265 -7182
11/17/2011
Page 1 of 1
From: Leslie Daugs [electlesliedaugs @gmail com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 9 36 AM
To: Patty Lent, City Council
Subject: Concerns about City Budget
Attachments. Mayor Lent and Bremerton City Council Members docx
Please see attached letter regarding the City budget
Thank you,
Leslie
11/21/2011
Mayor Lent and Bremerton City Council Members
As you know, I have been very involved in attending council meetings and work sessions since before I
filed to run for office It has been my intention to be as well informed and knowledgeable of the
functions, information and procedures I wanted to make sure that I could hit the ground running if
elected
As that I will be one of the council members responsible for 2012,1 would like to share some ideas
around balancing the budget
• My greatest concern is that we are balancing our budget during these difficult times on the
backs of our employees who provide direct service to the community
• Laying off 26 employees means that if and when the economy turns around we need these
people They are well trained and dedicated If we lose them than we lose all of the money we
spent on training and hiring them We also lose their experience
• Once the economy does turn around we will have the added expense of hiring and training new
employees Sure, some employees may be available for re -hire but most will be gone
I would like to propose that we consider utilizing furloughs with a wage freeze as a prudent TEMPORARY
measure for dealing with these difficult economic times.
• Many cities and counties have proactively used furlough days as a budget balancing strategy
• Some local governments are even planning on removing furlough days in 2012 because they
proactively used them in 2010 and 2011
• By using conservative estimates, twelve (12) furlough days a year can save between 3% and 4%
of payroll
• Overall savings could be $1 million to $14 million
I suggest the following considerations
• Furloughs should be across the board wherever possible and must include department heads
and supervisors
• Due to laws concerning elected officials compensation, we cannot change their pay by edict
However, I think it would be a sign of solidarity and good leadership for all of us to voluntarily
take a pay reduction equal to 5% of our compensation Immediately
• Employees and union representatives will be more likely to negotiate in good faith on furloughs
if they know it will avoid layoffs
• There are several areas of city employment that will need special consideration in furloughs
Examples would be any services that require 24/7 coverage (police, fire, utilities, etc ) and areas
where office hours are mandated such as court services.
• One additional consideration is the actual furlough days Some local governments have carefully
selected furlough days to coincide with existing holidays Furloughs ask both represented and
unrepresented employees to take a temporary reduction in pay Having furlough days that give
people an extra day with their families at Thanksgiving or IndbeWdence Day is a nice
recognition of their shared sacrifice
These are difficult financial times in our city I strongly propose that temporary furlough days in ZOIZ
helps bridge the gap, respects the value of our employees, and positions us for recovery without
additional costs down the line
Thank You,
Leslie Daugs, Councilman Elect
City of Bremerton, District 2
Page 1 of 1
- - - -- -- - -- -
From Ibishop1 @comcast net
Sent Tuesday, November 15, 2011 4 25 PM
To City Council
Subject Parks and Recreation, Nispic Senior Center, Budget Cuts
It is my understanding that there may be budget cuts for the Nispic Senior Center in the
new year
Our concern is that Holly Peterson, Recreation Program Coordinator III could be
replaced or her
position cut sure how this works, but I do understand budgets If it should come down
to this
situation for consideration, please consider all other alternative It would be a great loss
to all of
the members and visitors at the Senior Center for us to lose Holly as our leader She is
one of us
She know all of the members by name She plays with us, dances with us, listens to us
as part
of her fob and we all consider her family If there is something that we can do as
members to assure
that she retains her position, please let us know
11/15/2011
Page 1 of 1
From Ibishop1 @comcast net
Sent Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2 10 PM
To City Council
Subject Senior Center Budget cuts
The subject for this email concerns the city council replaceing Holly Peterson,
Recreation Program Coordinator III
Holly Peterson makes all the seniors that visit the Senior Center feel special and she
goes way above the expected to give the members purpose and entertainment
I understand that there is a need to make budget cuts but replaceing Holly does not
seem like the best idea for use of the cities manpower Reducing hours might work
better
Loren Bishop
11/15/2011
Page 1 of 1
From Christine Grerner on behalf of City Council
Sent Tuesday, November 15, 2011 1 32 PM
To Colen Corey
Subject- Budget Follow Up - Streets Fund
Attachments 2012 Street Fund Budget Recommendation Concerns doc, City of Bremertontypical paving
operation doc
Thank you, Colen for the additional information on Streets
I have forwarded your email to the Council Members for their review and consideration
Christine Grenier
Council /Auditor Assistant
City of Bremerton
(360) 473 -5280
From: Colen Corey
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 1 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Budget
I have more information upon request
Thank you,
Colen Corey
11/15/2011
2012 Street Fund Budget Recommendation Concerns
To help identify my credentials I have held the Operations Manager position, Street
Supervisor, Street Lead and Street specialist positions with knowledge of the
operational equipment from paving machines to dump trucks. I feel very qualified
to make these statements sticking to the facts and putting my reputation of 27 years
working in the Operations of this Department. This report does not include the
Electronics division of Public Works.
• The City Council meeting of November 9 th was not informative enough to
give details of all the facts.
• In 2008 the Street Division had 13 FTE's with an additional 9 part time
seasonal employees. The 2012 proposed budget only has 6 FTE's and no
seasonal employee's.
• Paving operations can not be sustained with such a minimal work force.
• The 2008 budget was supported by 42,637 man hours, the 2012 proposed
budget only supports 12,480 hours approximately 70 % reduction.
• The $367 K budget line item for supplies can not be utilized by only 6 FTE's
the required staffing for a paving operation would be 10 FTE's & 4 seasonal.
• From 1995 to 2008 the Street Division paved approximately 26 miles,
equalling roughly 53,340 tons at average cost of $77.00 per ton in place. The
average cost per ton in place today by vendors would be approximately
• Street Division in addition to paving has the responsibility for sidewalk
restoration, vegetation removal, guard rails, fences, pavement markings,
grading of alleys, pot holes, tripping hazards, removal hazardous trees, road
shoulder maintenance, signs and more. The majority of these tasks are
necessary to be performed within a 5 month (May to September) window.
• Emergency services to the citizens of Bremerton will be strained with only 6
FTE's within the Street Division to respond to such activities as winter
storms for snow removal, flooding, mud slides, wind storms.
• In closing, paving operations can not happen in this proposed budget with
the allotted man power, the sign infrastructure & pavement markings are in
jeopardy, delays in emergency services can be anticipated. These cuts are
very deep and the liability to the city is great.
City of Bremerton
Typical Paving Operation
Labor Matrix 2008
• Traffic control and ground labor -- 4 Temporary
employees
• John Biehl— Roller Operator (3014)
• Colen Corey —Paver Operator (3105)(3004)
• Scott Corey – Paver Operator (3105)
• Terry Devery – Asphalt Raker (3022)
• Zach Lounsberry – Asphalt Raker
• Ghyrn Hobson – Truck Driver (3106) (3010- Tack
Truck)
• Tony Hough – Truck Driver (3093)
• Mike Hart – Truck Driver (3091) & Haul Paver
• Jim Iovinelli – Truck Driver (3092)
• John Corey – Truck Driver (3069)
• 10 FTEs and 4 temporary seasonal employees
• Typically haul 200 to 400 ton ' / 2 " HMA per day depending
on fob quantity required.
• Typically some limited pre - leveling required for 2" overlay
• Same amount of employees needed for grinding operation
• 1 or 2 passes at curb with grinder depending on street profile
• Asphalt removal with hack hammer at utility castings and
immediate curb face
• Extensive clean up required after grinding
"RECEIVED CITY COUNCIL Off (E
PATE 11 liq ( I
Cam.. � �.. �� - - - - �._ �..' - _
CC a 0
A'
ra, -In
"fz C
OL-
4L
Gerry Shipman
3291 NW Mt Vintage WaT,
, Apt G505
SiNerdals, WA 9838314
Page 1 of 1
From sashasmommeow @comcast net
Sent Tuesday, November 15, 2011 9 25 AM
To City Council
Cc Linda
Subject senior center
Bremerton City Council - Assume you have received the petitions from the Bremerton
Senior Center members Have you looked at an activities calendar printed in the
newsletter? What will happen to these activities if there is no director? Newspaper
articles say that the largest growing population in the United States is the senior
population Many of those are on limited incomes and senior center provides affordable
activities
Linda Sheely
3547 Courtyard Lane
Bremerton, WA 98310
11/15/2011
Page 1 of 1
From disneyholt @q com
Sent Monday, November 14, 2011 2 48 PM
To City Council
Subject Bremertom Senior Center
Holly Peterson,Recreation Program Director of the center does an outstanding fob As a
member, I would like to see her retain that positon Thank you, Edith
Holt
11/15/2011
Page 1 of 1
From Paul Vlastelica [pvlastel ica @yahoo com]
Sent Thursday, November 10, 2011 9 38 PM
To City Council
Subject SENIOR CENTER
To the council
My wife and I are current members of the Bremerton Senior Center
Its director, Holly Peterson has done a wonderful job We have heard that there is a
strong possibility that she may loose that position
That Is a hard position to fill and do It right Not dust "anybody" can run the senior
center, treat its members with respect, and keep us active
We would like you all to think very seriously about putting someone else In that
position It is difficult and time consuming Allot of extra hours are needed
to properly do a top notch job
Anything less than 120% will not only cost you membership in the Senior Center, but
also headaches and constant complaints
We highly recommend that you leave Ms Peterson In that position and look elsewhere
to make your position cuts
Paul and Cathy Vlastellca
Bremerton, WA
11/15/2011
Page 1 of 1
From Bonnie Dunmire [bonnie brem @hotmad com]
Sent Thursday, November 10, 2011 4 51 PM
To City Council
Subject Bremerton Budget Cuts
After reading the article in the Sun regarding the proposed budget for Bremerton many of us at the
Senior Center are very concerned about the Parks
Department and what cuts will be made For many of us who live alone this is the only place we have to
go and feel safe to get involved and be able to
socialize with other people
Our present Recreation Program Coordinator Holly Peterson has shown outstanding organizational skills,
great personality and dedication to the 625 plus
members of the center Consideration of her degree in recreation, and proven skills of already doing the
job successfully should be the deciding factor
for her to remain in this position I would hope you are not going to replace her because someone else
has seniority and can be paid less regardless
of qualifications and ability
If you dig deep enough and look far enough there has to be another avenue to achive your budget goals
Thank you for your consideration
to this matter
Bonnie Dunmire
Bremerton Senior Center Member
11/15/2011
Page 1 of 1
From: City Council
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 3 52 PM
To: Pattycakesdiv@aol corn
Subject: FW Citizen Concern - Support for Holly Peterson /Senior Center Budget Cuts (Pat Yarbrough)
From: Pattycakesdiv @aol.com [madto.Pattycakesdiv @aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 20112:17 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Concerned Citizen on Senior Center Budget Cuts
It has come to my attention that Holly Peterson from the Nipsic Senior Center might lose her fob
I have known Holly since she worked at Silverdale Community Center and was "forced" to leave that
position due to budget cuts which is now defunct, it seems you want to force her out of Nipsic also
Since 1998 1 have been going to the Senior Centers and in 2000 when my husband passed away, they
have literally been my survival It is the one place a senior can go and feel safe and meet other seniors
Seeing Holly there and a familiar face helped a lot She does a wonderful job of directing activities and
planning trips, especially places we couldn't drive to any more
I realize there is a budget problem -but I really think there could be another way to handle some problems,
like people in higher positions taking one day a week off (it's been done), which would save a lot, or a cut
in pay to allow other people to keep their jobs
Mayor Patty Lent was at our Halloween luncheon, it's obvious now, to evaluate Holly and /or the whole
center, which has approximately 650 members
Please realize how much this center and Holly have done for this community
Thank you for taking the time to at least listen.
I remain
MS Pat Yarbrough
11/10/2011
Page 1 of 1
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10 27 AM
To- 'rule32@wavecable com'
Subject: FW Citizen Comment - Support for Holly Peterson (Richard Levin)
From: Rich and Ilene [ma i Ito: ru le32@wavecable.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10.01 AM
To: City Council
Cc: rule32 @wavecable corn
Subject: Holly Peterson
My name is Richard Levin. I am the director of the Bremerton Sunshine Singers We meet
every Monday to rehearse at the Bremerton Senior Center
Holly Peterson is the director of the Bremerton Sr Center. I have heard the the Bremerton City
Council is considering replacing Holly as director of the Bremerton Senior Center
As director of this group (we perform at many retirement homes in Kitsap County) we have
been given excellent support by the Senior Center to use their rehearsal facilities Holly
Peterson is greatly responsible for our being able to have a place to rehearse She has gone out
of her way to make us feel comfortable and has assisted us in scheduling, not only time for our
rehearsals, but for some social activities of our group
She has always assisted our group's needs for any request we have made It would be a great
loss to us if she were not to continue in her present position
We strongly suggest to the City Council that she be retained in her position
Sincerely,
Richard Levin, director
Sunshine Singers
11/10/2011
Page 1 of 2
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 2 59 PM
To: 'Jerwayne @ com cast net'
Subject- FW Citizen Comment - City Layoffs /Holly Peterson (Marlys Price)
Ms Price,
Thank you for your letter, which I have forwarded to the City Council Members for their review and
consideration I have also shared your comments with the Mayor, Finance Director, and Parks Director
for their information
It is appreciated that you took the time to share your comments and concerns
Lori Smith
Zito S"1%
Legislative Assistant
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473 -5280
From: Jerwayne @comcast.net [mailto:Jerwayne @comcast net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 20115 04 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Regarding impending layoff notices
Imagine opening up the Kitsap Sun today & read "New Park ready for visitors" Well I
did & I was certainly irritated Not because there is a new park, but because the Kitsap
Sun reported that the city was going to have to layoff workers to balance the budget I
realize, according to what the Kitsap Sun reported, that the monies have appeared &
not financed by city residents although in a round about way they have been because
anyone paying income tax to the federal government is paying for these grants for
Community Development Okay, I have gotten that off my chest, now it is on to my real
concern of a potential layoff of our excellent Director of the Bremerton Senior Center
which is a part of the Parks & Recreation Department Our Director, Holly Peterson,
has made the Senior Center what it is today An exceptional place for our growing
Senior community to share exercise, dance, games, fellowship and enjoy our many
wonderful trips & luncheons that Holly puts together They are wonderful & our
members get dressed up, have some place to go instead of vegetating at home &
becoming ill from loneliness & disassociation from others in the same boat as they are
I have been employed at the Senior Center as an office assistant for 6 years & have
marveled at the wonderful things that Holly has been able to do for the Center & it's
members I have witnessed patrons coming to the Center saying that their children are
worried about them being alone & not have any social contact After having a tour of
the center & explanation of our activities, we see them arriving on a regular basis
enjoying the activites & trips along with others & becoming a totally new person They
are no longer sitting at home with nothing to do I have been on many of the trips which
Holly, our Director, has put together & she has an awesome insight into what is fun and
available for seniors to do She has an excellent connection with the Senior population
which is something not everyone has
11/9/2011
Page 2 of 2
Why doesn't the city think of cutting hours or salary of the administration staff since we are in
such a budget crunch? One fob that I feel could be cut is our full time parks planner I believe
that we now have enough parks in the Bremerton area for it's residents to go to & also, if we
are cutting the Parks & rec staff that maintains these parks we simply don't need anymore
work for the maintenance staff that is remaining
Please rethink your idea to remove her from the fob that she is so totally suited for I would
really hate to see the Senior Center go by the wayside & I am confident that would happen if
Holly was not the Director because she is the Senior Center
In closing, I appreciate your attention to the information that I have Just emailed to you
Signed
Marlys Price, a very concerned City of Bremerton voter
11/9/2011
Page 1 of 1
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 4 46 PM
To- City Council
Subject- FW Citizen Comment - Bremerton Senior Center /Holly Peterson (Larry Taylor)
From: Larry Taylor [madto:yrralt @comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 3 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Bremerton Senior Center - Holly Peterson, Director
Because of the proposed City layoffs, I am asking that you keep Holly Peterson as director of the Senior
Center
Holly has a rapport with the members and has done more for the center than any other director An
example of this is when the pool room needed new tables, Holly raised money through volunteers and
from the selling of the old tables, which were donated by members years ago The bottom line is, Holly
got $18,600 00 worth of new commercial pool tables for less than a $2,000 00 cost to the city Holly has
worked on many other fund raisers in an effort to keep the center functioning in these tight budget times
Larry Taylor, Member & Volunteer
11/8/2011
Page 1 of 1
1 '
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 12 44 PM
To: City Council
Subject: FW Citizen Comment - Potential Senior Center Director Change (Roberta J Griffus)
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From rbobgriffus @netzero corn [madto rbobgriffus @netzero com]
Sent Tuesday, November 08, 201110 41 AM
To City Council
Cc Parks
Subject Potential Senior Center Director Change
At the regular business meeting of the Bremerton Art Guild, Monday, November 7th, we were informed
of the potential replacement of the current Senior Center Director, Holly Peterson This would be a
disaster to the members of the Senior Center as we know and rely on Holly Peterson to direct our
various activities Holly is always available to us and our many questions, creative in her planning of
events, open to our suggestions and cares about each and every one of us
I am involved in the Art Guild, the Exercise class, the trips and the Shoe -Ins walking group, the West
Sound Senior Games, as well as the luncheons and holiday events The majority of the members are
involved in more than one opportunity that the center offers under Holly's direction The Bremerton
Senior Center is like our second home and we value Holly Peterson as our Director
Please consider the impact of your decision on this matter
Respectfully,
Roberta J Griffus, Secretary, Bremerton Art Guild
2254 High View Ln N W
Bremerton, WA 98312
360 - 479 -5445
11/8/2011
Page 1 of 1
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 12 17 PM
To: 'Jeremy & Daphne Blanchard'
Subject- RE Citizen Comment - Support for Senior Center /Holly Peterson (Daphne Blanchard & Jean
Markovich)
From: Jeremy & Daphne Blanchard [madto.jdblanchard @isp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 20119:29 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Bremerton Senior Center
Dear Friends,
We are members of the "Sunshine Singers," a choral group at the Bremerton Senior Center We
have heard some disturbing news, that our efficient and caring manager, Holly Peterson, is to be
replaced She has done an incredible fob for the Senior Center, not dust for our group, but for
trips that are offered, the arts and crafts programs, various classes, aerobics, etc Safety is a
number one concern of hers and she has done an excellent fob of ensuring that all who
participate in the center's activities are well cared for She oversees all the paperwork and has
developed vital programs for the seniors Please do not replace her. We would miss her
terribly.
Thank you for taking this matter into consideration
Sincerely,
Daphne Blanchard
Jean Markovich
11/8/2011
i
From. gall dupee [gdupee68 @gmad com]
Sent Monday, November 07, 2011 9 04 PM
To City Council
Subject. Possible change at Bremerton Senior Center
I am writing to recommend that you retain Holly Peterson as the Bremerton Senior Center
Director
Holly is a very good organizer I believe she is one of a kind
She understands our group of folks She wears many hats by organizing our outings, senior
games, newsletters, many activities that are ongoing each day luncheons, music, various
games, dancing and being our aerobics instructor
She is very suited to doing this work She remembers our names and
this alone makes us all feel special I work on Mondays helping I
hope we can keep her and her lovely attitude and smile
Please think twice before you replace her,
Thanks for giving me your time,
Gail Dupee
320 Washington AVE Unit 105
Phone 360- 440 -3882
1
Page 1 of 1
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 7 08 PM
To- City Council
Subject: FW Citizen Comment - Support for Senior Center /Holly Peterson (Larry & Irene Pettit)
From: larpe @comcast net [madto larpe @comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 6 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Holly Peterson
My wife and I live in Gig Harbor but belong to the senior center in Bremerton, even
though Gig Harbor has its own senior center The reason is due to Holly Peterson. She
does an absolutely wonderful fob of conducting the center in Bremerton It would be an
awful loss to lose her She is well loved by all who are served by her
Please, please reconsider letting her go"
Larry and Irene Pettit
2017 26th Street Court NW
Gig Harbor, WA 98335
253 - 514 -8188
11/7/2011
Page 1 of 1
From: Will Maupin@comcast net
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 1 31 PM
To: john witte
Cc: City Council
Subject: Re
John,
Thank you for contacting me I agree with the points you have made and am
determined to get to the real reasons for the proposed cuts and try to come up with a
balanced budget that meets the needs of the citizens of Bremerton while retaining as
many of our loyal employees as possible
Will
From: "john witte" <johnw @teamsters589 org>
To: "will maupin" <will maupin @comcast net>
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 10 42 14 AM
Mr Maupm, I hope this e-mail finds you in good health, and I am sorry that we have not had a chance to
talk one on one, but as I have observed at the KT board, you are a very busy man What I do ask of you
is advice, knowledge, and your expertise to help me understand the proposed position cuts at the City of
Bremerton to balance the Budget This is not dust a Union thing, but more so, for the understanding of
what is being proposed by the Mayor and the Finance Director on how to balance the budget The
personnel cuts that are being proposed have no reason in some areas, it seems that they would create
more sub - contracting out and liability for the City than they would be worth For example- a simple task if
the budget goes thru- changing a street light that is burnt out, would have to contracted out- the proposed
cuts take the sign and signal department from 4 workers to 1- OSHA does not approve of 1 man in a
bucket truck without a spotter on the ground, or another is a 22 year employee from parks dept who does
the scheduling, all the front desk work, and payroll, and dust eliminate her position- that work has to go
somewhere, also lets hope it does not snow- the street and repair shop would not have enough people to
put chains on emergency vehicles, let alone enough to plow the streets for those vehicles to get around
There are to many to list here, but what Im asking of you, is that you and the rest of the council please
take the time to thoroughly review this proposal and make some sense of justification to it The effected
employees of the city and myself, trust your decisions more than the 2 who are proposing it If ever you
would consider talking about this- feel free to call anytime- my cell number is 360- 621 -3278- also feel free
to give that number to any of the other council members Thank you again for your time and
consideration
Sincerely,
John Witte
Secretary Treasurer
Teamsters Union Local 589
phone # 360 - 613 -4062
Fax# 360 - 698 -0629
11/7/2011
Page 1 of 1
a
From Al Butler [spectapulars @wavecable com]
Sent- Saturday, November 05, 2011 8 53 AM
To City Council
Subject Potential Senior Center Director Change
It has been brought to my attention that due to necessary budget cuts, the Parks Department will have to cut several
employees which may cause the replacement of the current Senior Center Director, Holly Peterson I have been a
member of the Senior Center since 1992 and the Treasurer of SUMS since 1994 and a volunteer on Fridays I
believe I can offer some perspective on this situation I have seen the Senior Center grow from 200 plus members to
the current membership of over 700 Most of this membership growth and activities expansion can be attributed to
the efforts of the current Director Her degree in Recreation Management, ability to perform a multitude of tasks
and her ability to engage various community agencies and facilities to support many on -going activities was not as
evident under past Directors There are several vital areas that would be affected immediately by Holly's departure
The publication of the "Active Us ", in my judgment the best in the State, the planning and execution of daily trips
(at least two per month), the production of monthly luncheons and pool tournaments, and the conduct of the exercise
class three times a week There are also many other requirements that the Director performs that are necessary for
the smooth operation of the Senior Center but are not apparent to most members To bring in a replacement would
be most disruptive to current Senior Center operations and plans It is my extreme wish and desire that Holly
Peterson be retained as the Senior Center Director Respectively, Al Butler, SUMS Treasurer
11/7/2011
11/5/2011 8 52 AM FROM Ken TO 4735080 PAGE 001 OF 001
Mr Adam C. Brockus, District 3 Council VP
Fax: 473 -5280
We seniors need your help and advice and since our facility is in
your district, we call upon you. It has been rumored that as a
result of Mayor Lent's reduction of city staff to balance the
budget, we will lose our Director, Holly Peterson. We plead our
case to you Mr. Brockus. Holly is the only full time employee we
have and to lose her to a replacement would be unbearable
since she has proven to be invaluable. This position cannot be
filled by just any replacement employee and the programs that
Holly has instituted have pleased the members and they want
them to continue without having to start all over by taking on the
expense and time to train a new employee. The Active Us
publication is certainly a testament to that involvement
SUMS, our fund raising organization, does repairs and
maintenance to the facility and purchases needed equipment.
Over the years we have donated over $100,000.00 for
3 <$ =
improvements to the facility for our members.
0 k'a �Y iwi40
$ X scr >m" "6 1 "'? ,
' $�FY Wy
a 7 ! ,01 �x
As seniors, we love Bremerton and to my knowledge we have
never asked for help before.
Please let us know the process to plead our case before it is too
late. We have 700 members and we will all be forever grateful for
your help. Thank you.
Ken Ward, Volunteer o/ y darts o 1.
360 1663
Pat Ward, Sums President
36077 -1663
Al Butler, Sums Treasurer
360.692 -1680
Page 1 of 1
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 10 53 AM
To: 'Ikinman5@q com'
Subject. RE Citizen Concern - Senior Center Budget Cuts (Jean Inman)
Ms Inman,
Thank you for your letter, which I have forwarded to the City Council Members for their review and
consideration I have also shared your comments with the Mayor, Finance Director, and Parks Director
for their information
It is always appreciated when citizens take the time to provide their comments and concerns
Lori Smith
/Ow 5.-A
Legislative Assistant
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473 -5280
From: jkmman5 @q.com [madto:jkinman5 @q.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 20116:14 AM
To: City Council
Subject: Senior.Center
I have been going to the Senior Center for ten plus years Started going after my husband died
It's a wonderful place to meet friends and participate in activities there
I hear Holly Peterson's fob is in jeopardy Do you realize she is the one who makes our Senior
Center what is is today
I realize you have a budget for the city, but couldn't you cut her hours a bit and maybe raise the
senoir yearly dues and keep Holly Peterson there as our Director
We do believe it is the best in the county She is the backbone to our center We are proud of
what goes on there I hope you realize what would happen if this comes to pass Sure hope you
reconsider
Jean Inman
Bremerton, WA
11/4/2011
Page 1 of 1
From Darlene Herrmann [dardarher @gmad com]
Sent Thursday, November 03, 2011 4 32 PM
To City Council
Subject Senior center rift
I am concerned that Holly Peterson's position will be rifted in January She is an asset to the
seniors and the center
Please try to make cuts somewhere else We would be willing to pay larger dues For alot of
seniors the center and
its programs are the only social events in their lives
Sincerely,
Darlene Herrmann
Retired City Employee
11/7/2011
Page 1 of 2
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 9 52 AM
To: City Council
Subject: FW Mayor's Response to Citizen (Employee) Concern - Budget shortfall (William Rieger)
Attn Council, Becky Hasart (FYI)
From: Patty Lent
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 20118:51 PM
To: City Council
Subject: RE: Citizen Concern - Budget shortfall (William Rieger)
Hello Mr Sherlock,
This was a very difficult budget to develop with the assistance of all department directors
The city is negotiating right now with four bargaining unions, their contracts expire Dec 31, 2011, so we
legally cannot offer concessions outside of the union talks Since I have been Mayor, all employees,
unionized and non - represented, have given back nearly 5% of their wages in order not to have layoffs
The revenue is dust not supporting the number of employees in city government today
We are trying to cross train so our staff can work as a team and cover where needed The layoffs allow
these employees to remain on a call back list for 18 months, so we can reinstate some if our revenue
increases and /or our union contracts allow concessions when ratified We do have to watch what the
state and federal government is doing that may have a trickle down effect also
I appreciate your concern and have taken note of your suggestions to be more efficient, stop remodeling
unnecessarily and be certain the departments are staffed appropriately
Please continue to stay engaged in making recommendations to my administration
Patty Lent, Mayor
City of Bremerton
From: Christine Grenier On Behalf Of City Council
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 20114-37 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Citizen Concern - Budget shortfall (William Rieger)
Attn Council, Mayor Lent, Becky Hasart (FYI)
From: Sherlock Bill [mailto:sherlockbill @yahoo com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 20112 49 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Budget shortfall
Dear Council members:
I have written to you before on various budget issues I am concerned as a City resident, rate
payer, and employee about the financial pickle we are in I'm hoping the Council will ask for
other options then laying off such a large number of employees in this depressed economy
11/3/2011
I
Page 2 of 2
Across the board wage and hours reductions and fob sharing should be considered. Employees
contributing to health care costs should be on the table. It is disturbing to me to see us reach this
point I've seen large amounts of money spent on such things as endless and unnecessary building
remodels The Olympus Drive facility is a centrally and conveniently located building right off the busy
main artery through West and East Bremerton Tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent
to remodel the Oyster Bay facility and move employees over to an area that is not centrally located In
spite of our financial crisis, the Oyster Bay bathrooms at this time are undergoing a remodel' And now
there is talk about uprooting groups of employees to another location' This frivolous spending needs to
stop I'm hoping the Council will hold the line on any more money spent on remodeling, rewiring,
refurnishing, or moving employee groups around We need to make do with what we have and where
we are I can understand why the ratepayers and taxpayers are up in arms Thank you for your
consideration
Sincerely,
William L Rieger
PO Box 2423
Bremerton, Wa 98310 -0317
Phone 360 - 377 -8443
Please use your reply button when responding to this message It will lielp avoid the Spam filter that is in
place Thank you
I
I
I
11/3/2011
I
Page 1 of 2
From- Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 1 35 PM
To: City Council
Subject: FW Citizen Concern - Budget Concerns (Bruce Hall)
Attn Council, Mayor Lent, Becky Hasart (FYI)
From: greg wheeler [madto.electgregwheeler @gmad com]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 20119 18 PM
To: Bruce Hall
Cc: City Council
Subject: Re. Round what now
Bruce,
Thank you for sharing your concerns and frustrations I will forward your email to the rest of
the City Council, for their consideration, while we work on the 2012 budget I have made note
of your concerns about the Property Tax increase and will be mindful of it's impacts on you and
other citizens who are on fixed incomes
Lori,
Please forward Mr Hall's email to the rest of the City Council
Thank you,
Greg Wheeler
Bremerton City Council
District 5
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4 38 PM, Bruce Hall < leg - al313 @yahoo com wrote
Greg,
After reading what the one wrote about how the money and all was handled and such meaning
all he said was what I have been saying for years now All the yes people on the council voting
for things this place does not need when there are other things the city does need, but no we have
to kiss up to the mayor at the time meaning Boseman and probably before him and after him to
Spend send and more spending is all the city government can do for here, well o not just that lets
spend all this money on things not needed and make the home owners and such pay for it Not
the whole people of Bre but just the home owners and such I did state I could understand and
see something like a raise in sale tax but no we have to make the select pay So now home
owners seniors that own their homes and even others that might be having trouble making ends
meet, well all I can see and here the city council and other elected officials saying something like
the hell with the people of Bremerton This all sucks and all you are doing is sucking more life
out of the people of Bremerton and also now lets let some people go from their fobs, they do not
need them anyway, you know families to feed and families to raise, but that dust does not seem to
mean anything to the city officials of this town This sucks Greg and that is all I can say Do not
10/31/2011
Page 2 of 2
bother listening to the people we do not know anything anyway The council is for the council and the
city is for the city and neither is for the ones that mean the most to both you these, the people of the
city Wow what a big let down of this place.
BiLice
I
I
i
10/31/2011
Most Honorable Council Members. October 28, 2011
The Mayor's proposed 2012 budget, if accepted, will cause disastrous inefficiencies in
Public Works operations
While it is reasonable that a reduction in force may be necessary, given the current
economic climate, the architecture of several position cuts will bring on gross ineptitude
throughout Public works and Utilities Consequently, the Mayor's "reductions" will cost
Bremerton, even in the short term
For example A supervisor position is eliminated He exercises his current contractual
right to bump into any position a) held by someone even hired even 1 day after him, and
b) for which he can attain the "minimum qualifications" within six months to one year
Consequently, a chain reaction of the same ensues, and ultimately, ten formerly effective
workers hold jobs for which they aren't the best person and one low ranking person is
laid off
The inefficiencies with the situation are obvious. The supervisor's specialized training,
talents, experience and knowledge go to waste, he goes back to square one, clamoring to
accumulate the minimum qualifications for his new position Meanwhile, the employee
that held that position's qualifications, and so much more experience, knowledge, and
talent, is displaced and barely qualified in another position And so on, and so forth.
While the city cuts the low man's position in the end, and saves the cost of his
employment, the process disrupts whole department
A rough survey indicates that almost every crew will have highly effective employees
bumped out of position Not only does Bremerton have a lot of time and money invested
in these workers, they are clearly the ideal ones to do more with less in 2012.
The proposed Public Works budget is a hatchet job, a document with surgical creativity
should be in its place I implore the Council to demand a responsible budget that takes
into account the toxic fallout of these insipid cuts
Thanks for your consideration,
Concerned Teamster
Page 1 of 1
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 913 AM
To 'Joe Stansbery'
Subject RE Employee Letter - City Layoff (Joe Stansbery)
Joe,
Thank you for your letter, which was provided to President Maupin as you directed, but it was also
shared with the rest of the Council Members for their review and consideration
As you may already know, the first Budget Workshop is scheduled to begin at 4 00 PM on Tuesday,
November 1, 2011 in the [6 Floor] Council Conference Room
Your comments are appreciated
Lori Smith
Legislative Assistant
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473 -5280
From: Joe Stansbery [mailto Joestansbery@msn com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 20116 32 PM
To: City Council
Subject: City Layoff
Dear Mr Maupin
-My name is Joe Stansbery and I live on 17th Street in your district, I am a City Employee as well
I have worked for the City for 15 plus years so I more than likely will not be effected by this
layoff as far as my employment is concerned It does however concern me that not only will we
lose a lot of skilled workers, we will also clog our departments due to bumping rights with
people who are not skilled in the position they will be filling The time it takes to retrain them
will destroy our Utility Dept I know that this is a union issue and there is nothing that can be
done about that, I Just want to know from you that the City Council has explored every avenue
it can to keep from laying off my co- workers and friends Last time there was talk of layoffs we
were asked about furloughs, why not this time? Does this have anything to do with our pending
union negotiations? There are rumors that this is a ploy to strong arm us into accepting a
contract I am involved with the customer response program for the City and over the years I
have seen our Streets get worse and our service suffer because of cuts, I can't help but think
that as a result of these layoffs the construction and maintenance divisions of Water,
Sewer /Storm, Streets, and Parks will get so far behind by the time we are fully staffed again we
will not be able to dig ourselves out of the hole that is created I know that this is a very
stressful time for council as well and I am sorry to bother you, but as you can imagine the
rumors are out of control and as employees we feel like no one is on our team, hearing that you
guys are doing all you can to sort this out would go a long way with everyone
Thank You,
Joe Stansbery
410617th Street
Bremerton WA, 98312
10/27/2011
� I
From Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent Wednesday, October 26, 2011 2 34 PM
To City Council
Subject FW Employee Letter - Proposed Budget Changes to Electronics (Jeff Collins /Shaun
Bedrosian /Rob Charvat)
Attachments Electronics staffing shortages pdf
Attn Council Members
Please see the employee letter for your advanced review, printed copies will be provided for your Council Packets
Lori Smith
.4oati
Legislative Assistant
Bremerton City Council
(360) 473 -5280
From: Jeff Collins
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12 52 PM
To: Lori Smith
Subject: Proposed budget changes to electronics
Lori if you could please give this info to the council members
Thanks
This is Shaun and Jeff's response to our layoff notices
Electronics staffing
shortages
Jeff Collins
Electronics Technician
City of Bremerton
(360) 473 -5370
Jeff collms(a)cl bremerton wa us
i
Electronics staffing shortages
In 2008 we had 8 FTE's doing all functions, in 2009 and 2010 we lost 4 positions and have barely kept
up with required work In 2012 we will be left with one position, due to the projected budget reduction
the Electronics Personnel would no longer be able to perform the following functions
Tunnel maintenance / repair — contract with state to do work.
Lighting, generator, power system(ups), traffic control, communications, emergency fans, PLC,
motor control centers, cameras, gates, and dialer Manage contracts for maintenance of systems
Festivals Beer fest, Blackberry, Harbor fest, Concerts on the boardwalks
Traffic Signals maintenance / repair / new standards
CMU testing required annually, cleaning displays and cabinets required annually, programming
controller, CMU programming, lamp changes, street lighting on traffic poles, emergency response,
knock downs, all documentation required, and for public records, maintaining coordination and
interconnect cable for syncing of signals on corridor, and city cable plant All required by law
We maintain 40 signals and 8 flashers with 2 signals being added The city will have no one to
install, maintain, interconnect, or coordinate the new signals
We maintain 6 signals for the State and 8 for Poulsbo We would be losing the revenue from
both agencies in the amount for $25,466 28 plus parts from Poulsbo and $7,552 16 from the State
We also would be paying the contractor $148,24128 plus $33,000 for a reserve account for a
total annual cost of $181,24128 and would not include coordination work, no equipment repair or
replacement over $500, no loop repair or replacement, any equipment upgrades, no plan review or
inspection, and any failures, malfunctions, or damages to signals, flashers or their components
Street Lighting
Maintenance and repairs of nearly 700 street lights This includes ballast change, lamp change,
head replacement, customer response, semi annual night patrol to take counts for repair and insure
proper operation, and knockdown repair or pole replacement Any work done on the street out of a lift
requires a minimum of 2 bodies to insure safety and traffic control The street lighting services include
complex electrical controls and strict specifications that need to be maintained and inspected routinely
We also stock and track parts and materials for all City poles
In 2010 Electronics staff spent a total of $12,153 43 on street light repairs, this includes both
parts and labor Puget quoted approximately $10,413 66 per month to maintain our lights for an annual
cost of $124,963 94 and that does not include spare parts and no repairs on specialty lighting with out
extra cost All green and blue poles throughout the city are considered specialty lighting
Plan Reviews Street lighting, Traffic Signal, & New construction
2 new signals are planned to be installed and 3 new replacements can not be reviewed
Electrical Maintenance / Repair
60 water resources buildings, 32 buildings maintained by facilities, 33 Parks, Gold MT golf
course, and Forestry building
Radio Installation and repair
Two way radio work — FCC mandate all radios shall be narrow band by Jan 2013
Locates: Poulsbo, Bremerton Update and maintain I -maps
Standby: No 24 hour service of traffic, tunnel, water, UV facility, and emergency response
High voltage work NFPA 70E 110 6 Any work 50 volts and above requires a qualified electrician
and a 2 nd person certified in electrical, CPR, and first aid for safety
Inspections of new lighting systems, traffic signals, and new construction
Update city specs for street lighting and traffic signal
Phone Maintenance / repair
911 mamtenance(PS /ALI database location info required by law), telephone billing, adds moves
and changes, and outages
Hiring an electrical contractor at prevailing wage rate of $110 an hour required by state will take only
909 hours to equal $100,000 which is less than a half year and nearly equal to one FTE wage and benefit
package
With the history of the city garage and treatment plant contracts it has proven that the quality of work is
not what it should be and the cost of taking back city facilities will cost more than was ever saved The
City has competent employees who want to work here and like their jobs and take pride in what they do
With the known costs for Traffic Signal and Street Lighting:
With the two positions that are getting removed from the budget it will cost the city $100,000
more in contracts than the two positions that are being removed This does not include any specialty
poles, time and materials for signal repair, or contractor fee for general maintenance on our 125 plus
buildings and parks
Jeff Collins
Rob Charvat
Shaun Bedrosian
Recent articles about budget cuts and personnel changes to the city of Bremerton prompt me
to write this letter. One of these changes would impact the Senior Center greatly and that
would be the loss of Holly Peterson, the Director of the center
Holly has been the Center's guiding force for several years now She clearly knows her fob, her
enthusiasm for all aspects of the fob is to be admired. Holly truly makes multi - tasking look
easy She knows most of the members by name and goes out of her way to make sure that
each person who walks thru the doors of the Center is treated with courtesy and is made to
feel welcome and a part of the Center
The classes and trips and luncheons at the Senior Center are a big success, I think largely due to
Holly's hard work. Having volunteered at the Center for almost three years now, I know that
Holly is wel I respected and liked by members and staff alike. She makes volunteering at the
Center enjoyable.
I hope that whomever makes personnel decisions affecting the Senior Center takes the time to
evaluate the needs of the Seniors in Bremerton and the outlying areas And, in doing so keeps
the staff intact at the Center.
Thank You,
Helga Nielsen, Senior Center volunteer
City of Bremerton
Employee suggested Compiled Cost saving list April 15, 2010
1 Instill City wide 4 day 10 hour work week Saving the city on ,lighting,
heating/cooling, reduced mileage(fuel) on take home vehicles
2 No building or land purchases, good deal or not
3 No building remodels or cosmetic fixes Only repairs for necessary structural safety
No painting, no new carpet, no new furniture
4 No new landscaping, tree or plant purchases, Maintain what we have
5 No Vehicle purchases, unless destroyed or un- repairable, or there is not another vehicle
to take its place
6 No Overtime unless approved by a Supervisor
7 No big or small equipment purchases, that otherwise could be rented
8 No replacement Hiring, consider Part-time help, or seasonal help
9 No travel or seminar attendance, unless this information cannot be obtained from the
internet, library or CD/DVD
10 Monitor closely the consumption of all supplies, both office and field
I 1 Space heaters during the winter months should be restricted
12 Cross train fulitime regular employees to be utilized during periods of short term
replacement
13 Discourage working from home, no supervisory control to get your moneys worth
14 For 2010, freeze upward pay grade movement
15 City wide, No more take home vehicles (exception for the Police)
16 Eliminate Cell Phones provided for City Employees, instead - give each Employee a
stipend that corresponds to their usage on a monthly basis, then the city gets out of the
responsibility of purchase, repair, support, order, review, audit, and bill paying Also
takes care of a IRS problem with "listed property"
17 Departments should share the cost of the planner position Does the Parks Department
really need this position full time
18 Close the Senior center and have them operate out of the Sheridan Community
Center This will save operational costs and the need for a part time receptionist
19 Close some of the smaller parks for the rest of the year If this doesn't sound
reasonable, designate part time hours of operation
20 Although fountains are pretty, do we really need them to operate the majority of the
day
21 Scale down on the Christmas lights display, (a lot of manpower to set up and take
down)
22 Contracting out work, If we now have individuals multi tasking, (eg Drafting and
GIS work) how can the city out source work for example to Paramatrix- that cost $75 to
$100
23 Matching Federal Grants, cant they be canceled or sent back, why are we spending
$250,000 for a fisherman's statue that only a select few will see 9
24 Charge for issuing Addresses and 27 street names- example at $25 per, could be
worth approx $3,000 annually
25 Lease or collect money owing on leases for people occupying the cities R/W, Approx
$10,000
26 Sell '/s off the city owned property on 5 street occupied by the Bremerton Sun (or
lease it to them) Approx $25,000 this is about half what the Co Assessor says it is
worth
27 Increase by double the R/W permit fees to cover the actual cost of issuing the permit
and the inspections Approx $3,000
28 Charge upfront for development review(like DCD does) and increase the cost to
cover the time actually used to review plans Approx $4,000
29 Waste Water Utility Fund, charge the correct number of unit fees for all waste water
accounts in the City Currently some of the rental properties are only charged for one unit
when they are converted to a duplex or triplex, or have two or more houses on one
property Could bring in $50,000 plus per year when all are account for
Mar Y e l( m T3AW - R - (473-
s�-F� Co (/)'o S (+ - 5 3710)
4
"RECEIVED CITY COUNCIL OFFICE°
III
Petition Mayor Lent, Bremerton City Council'�a�a -r °
Recreation Management
Save our Bremeon Senior Center Director's Job - - -
We, the 700 members of the Bremerton Senior Center petition the powers to be -
to let us keep Holly Peterson, our only full time paid employee to continue the
programs she has,set in place but are in Jeopardy in your 2012 budget As
seniors, we feel we don't have a lot of time to waste and doserve your approval
to keep Holly as our Director We will be eternally indebted to you
All these are her programs and duties including
1 Trips planning for short and extended, scheduling and chaperone as needed
2 Teach Aerobics class 3 times a week
3 Creating, producing, printing and mailing our bimonthly professional cluabty
Active Us Newsletter
4 Solicit sponsors for monthly luncheons, including menus, cooking selecting
themes, setting up tables and decorating them, design and print and sell
members the tickets
5 Hiring staff for activities that sernQr's request, which are paid out of fees from
participants Scheduling and supervising these classes and making payroll for
instructor's time
6 Maintain and direct the staff of volunteers working at the Center, including
computer training, landscaping and folding newsletters and working the office
7 Schedule local pool tournaments including scheduling with other Senior
Centers and solicit sponsors for luncheons
8 Oversee daily operations including setups, takedowns, open and close
building, janitorial, daily cash activities, ordering and restocking supplies etc
NAME TELEPHONE
n?` _ 3 &0- S - is'l7
4
6 -36- 0 - 26
ZZ
8�_ -�
Petition to Keep Holly Page # l
TRIPHONIE
3 b - - 7 - 7 - iocl
t - 7
Z1 ?2 430
/ -el,-
4 3
az j rO 3 77 �3 �
222 2=2
r
^� X3 373 -d�$'�
360 -31 - 0 IS
26 o �L7
d
X53 275' 09'7/
L ru
J 7 lfJ
Petition to Keep Holly Pa #
NAME T .T,F.PHON
yko
,3 '73 -
Q
S � f �
.3 -D�`D
2 5 - 5'66
V�j ( 3 60) 7 z I oq
s
ww
IA
Joolu
—3 3 7 -
3 ,90 377 7K 3o
3
Petition to Keep Holly Page # 3
NAMF TELEPHONE
76 /
37 — '770,6
A-al 40 AL
?1,I T
36 77f 3 CJ 2--
C�6 L (9 56n w 1 //
3b0—
.N V% a o 3 77
r-- re 1 v`r
3Ob 7T
act (o @:7
3 ?3 - a 5
ry
- 7 G 3
fc,
za
Petition to Kee Holly Pa
P Y e # g
NAMF TF I .PIM .
360 - /-/� q'- 3 ���
Petition to Keep Holly Page #
NAME TELEPHO
01co . iyd s on 3 (v 0 - 2-175 o y z R
3 6 o -- $ q 5- 398
L I
i
-- 36 f�7I - Z�>/ 7 L
�7,F ; /L27f
�a 69 �y -y�9?
g 4®- Z82- z jY3
� std
�`
60 - 7 0 6 -3
Petite ®n t® Keep H olly Pag # 6
NAM - I LFX RQ NE
3 23. 9�f Pr
i
3Ga - 7 P 7
.22s�
7 75 0
Petition to Kee Holt Pa 6
NAME Keep y P #
TELE IE
� 0 6�
���
Petition to Kee Holly P #
NAME P Y g
TF.T .F.PHOI�I�.
3669 q 7 9 - 33VI,,
U
ro LU-L T
0 9 7,3-,9'7 2
3 73 6
cr��R L L T 360 79� - g 7 6.6'
�6 0 - 2 I�
�/O c/- 4
5 3- -s y
r
a
Ow
, " C� Petition to Kee Hol Pag #
NAME 2� r y
TP, EPHME
3 a�
36o 6 7 > -- lGi 2 q
LAP' DR -C LSLT n) Lr-rC ()e(:Z � D � P � 3 6 a
X79
Y- 410 - 9 3 7c0
2 — - Z12 g
o 3�3 ° 73.3
4
Q o Y
&tk"tE4 dk �
e ok , A f �� � Petition to Kee Hol Pa
� p Y e # g —fY
7 / r
J
NAMF
- 9s'Sa36
3(aO
S 60
3 !"'o a
7� 03F7z
79a � 9�s7
6 fzrz
r
3(Qo °- silo° �C�OSL
36o- 6(3 5-v
Petition to keep Holly as our Director Page #��
Name Telephone #
o
(5m vw G- L1.. t 373- qa 4 1 4
La K 7 7