HomeMy WebLinkAbout3158 RESOLUTION NO. 31 g
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, ratifying amendments to the Kitsap
Countywide Planning Policies
WHEREAS, a Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) is a written policy statement
or statements used solely for establishing a countywide framework from which County and City
comprehensive plans are developed and adopted to ensure that City and County comprehensive
plans are consistent, and
WHEREAS, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council (KRCC) originally
adopted CPPs in 1992 to coordinate countywide planning among local jurisdictions, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and appropriate to update and revise CPPs
periodically to assist the coordination of local planning to keep current with changing conditions
and expectations, and
WHEREAS, the KRCC concluded the 2010 -2011 CPP update process with a set
of recommended amendments and additions to the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners on
May 24, 2011, and
WHEREAS, the Kitsap County Board of County Commissioners adopted the
revised CPPs with the passage of Kitsap County Ordinance No. 476 -2011 on November 14,
2011, with modification to the KRCC's recommendations by amending the text related to Fully
Contained Communities, adding reference to SEPA review on the Ratification diagram in
Appendix A, and removing all edits to Appendix B, Population Distribution, and
WHEREAS, under the amendment procedures incorporated in the CPPs, revisions
to the CPPs adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on November 14, 2011, do not take
effect until ratified by cities and Tribes within Kitsap County, and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton considers the CPPs as amended and adopted
by the Board of County Commissioners by Ordinance No 476 -2011 on November 14, 2011, to
be of benefit to the planning, development and growth interests of the City and County, NOW
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies as amended and adopted
by the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners on November 14, 2011 and attached hereto as
Exhibit A are hereby ratified
1
Countywide Planning Policies
SECTION Z Severabilyy If anyone or more sections, subsections, or sentences
of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and
effect
SECTION 3. Effective Date This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage
day of ZJ&
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this - 7 A
/iy► r , 2011
WILL MAUPIN, Co resident
APPROVED AS TO FORM A EST
G City At ne SHANNON CORIN, Interim City Clerk
2
Countywide Planning Policies
Blue: Denotes proposed revisions to the 2007 Adopted Kitsap CPP's
recommended to Kitsap County by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council on May 24, 2011
Red: Denotes proposed revisions to the 2007 Adopted Kitsap CPP's
proposed by Kitsap County during the adoption process
Proposed Revisions to the
Adopted Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies
November 19, 2007
Attached are the Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies as adopted by the Kitsap
County Board of Commissioners by ordinance on November 19, 2007 (Ordinance
403- 2007).The Countywide Planning Policies as revised are currently in effect in
Kitsap County.
The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies are the framework for growth management
in Kitsap County. Under the Growth Management Act, the Puget Sound Region is
defined as King, Kitsap, Snohomish and Pierce Counties. The Puget Sound Regional
Council is responsible for developing the four - county regional transportation and land
use vision. The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies tailor the Puget Sound Regional
Council's regional growth management guidelines to Kitsap County and are the
policy framework for the County's and the Cities' comprehensive plans. The Kitsap
Countywide Planning Policies address 14 separate elements, ranging from urban
growth areas to affordable housing.
The Countywide Planning Policies are required by the Growth Management Act
and may be appealed (only) by Cities and the Governor of Washington. The
original Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies (adopted by Kitsap County in 1992)
and subsequent revisions (August 2001, December 2003, November 2004,
November 2007, [Month of adoption], 2011 were developed through a multi -
jurisdictional collaboration sponsored by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
among: Kitsap County, the Cities of Bremerton, Bainbridge Island, Port Orchard &
Poulsbo, the Suquamish & Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribes, the Navy, the Port of
Bremerton, and Kitsap Transit.
Kitsap County is lead agency for its environmental review.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
49 2007
CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION.............................................................. ............................... 3
POLICY ELEMENTS
A.
Countywide Growth Pattern ( CW) ........................ ..............................5
B.
Urban Growth Areas ( UGA) .................................... ..............................
C.
Centers of Growth ( C) ........................ ...............................
...............4 13
D.
Rural Land Uses and Development Patterns (R) ........... .............................15
E.
Countywide Strategies for Open Space Preservation, Resource Protection
Critical Areas, Air Quality, and Water Quality /Quantity
(PPCAA Tf)... ...17
F.
Contiguous, Compatible, and Orderly Development (CCOD)
.................20
G.
Siting Public Capital Facilities
(CF).22
H.
Transportation ( T) ........................................ .............................
L
^^ Housing (AH) ......................... ...............................
031
J.
Countywide Economic Development (ED) ..............................
......3435
K.
An Analysis of the Fiscal Impact (FI) .................. ...........................537
L.
Coordination with Tribal Governments ( CT) ......... ............................3§38
M.
Coordination with Federal Government including Navy (CF)
............... .-3-739
N.
Roles & Responsibilities ( RR) ............................. ............................�41
APPENDIX
A. Ratification Process a
B. B -1 Population Distribution b -1
B -2 New Housing Units & Employment In Urban Areas b -2
Comprehensive Plan Projections
C. Urban Growth Area Management Agreements c
D. Revenue Sharing Interlocal Agreement (adopted December, 2001) d
E. Current Organizational Interlocal Agreement e
F. Regional and Kitsap- Designated Centers List f
G. Centers & Limited Areas of More Intensive Rural Development (LAMIRD) Matrix g
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
2 i,zrdcn4o�; 49 2007
INTRODUCTION
The Growth Management Act (GMA) is founded on the principle that it is in the best interest of the
citizens of the State to foster coordination and cooperation among units of local and state government.
Cities and counties must engage in a collaborative planning process under the requirements of the Act.
Specifically, the Act states that, "THE LEGISLATURE FINDS THAT UNCOORDINATED AND UNPLANNED
GROWTH ... POSE A THREAT TO THE ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND THE
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE ENJOYED BY RESIDENTS OF THE STATE. IT IS IN THE PUBLIC
INTEREST THAT CITIZENS, COMMUNITIES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR COOPERATE AND
COORDINATE WITH ONE ANOTHER IN COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANNING. " . To guide the development of
comprehensive plans and development regulations, the GMA sets forth planning goals (RCW
36.70A.020) in 13 areas:
1. Urban Growth
2. Reduce Sprawl
3. Transportation
4. Housing
S. Economic Development
6. Property RI his
7. Permits
8. Natural Resource Industries
9. Open Space and Recreation
10. Environment
11. Citizen Participation and Coordination
12. Public Facilities and Services
13. Historic Preservation.
The Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.210) states that "A COUNTYWIDE PLANNINGPOLICYISA
WRITTENPOLICYSTATEMENT OR STATEMENTS USED SOLELYFOR ESTABLISHING A COUNTYWIDE FRAMEWORK
FROM WHICH COUNTYAND CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLANSARE DEVELOPED AND ADOPTED ... (TO) ENSURE
THAT CITYAND COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLANSARE CONSISTENT... "as required in RCW 36.70A.100.
"NOTHING IN THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO ALTER THE LAND USE POWERS OF CITIES.". The
Act requires that the countywide policy be collaboratively developed among Cities and the County.
Further, "FEDERAL AGENCIESAND INDIAN TRIBES MAYPARTICIPATE INAND COOPERATE WITH THE
COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICYADOPTION PROCESS. " These policies may also be used for other
purposes requiring collaboration and cooperation in addition to the development and adoption of
comprehensive plans.
Vision 2040 (adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council durin g 2010) serves as the IoM-rajZge
growth management, environmental, economic development, and transportation strategy for Kind
Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties. Vision 2040 includes the Regional Growth Strategy, Multi -
County Planning Policies (RCW 36.70A.210) and Implementation Actions.
The 1992 Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent revisions in 2001,E 2003, 2007,and
20.11 were developed by a committee of planners representing Kitsap County, the City of Bremerton,
the City of Port Orchard, the City of Poulsbo, the City of Bainbridge Island, the Port Gamble
S'Klallam Tribe, the Suquamish Tribe, the Navy, and Kitsap Transit.' At each point, the Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council conducted a public hearing and prepared a recommendation for
adoption by the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners and ratification by Cities and Tribes. The
process of review and discussion through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council forum is intended
to foster consensus whenever possible. County and City Comprehensive Plans must be consistent with
the adopted Countywide Planning Policies.
' The Kitsap County Health District and Kitsap Economic Development Alliance (KEDA) also reviewed and
commented upon the 2011 amendment proposals.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
Policies for Update and Ratification (UR)
1. The Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies should be dynamic and regularly monitored for
applicability and effectiveness.
a. The adopted Countywide Planning Policies should be reviewed through the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council process at least every five years. Proposed revisions shall be reviewed
for impacts according to the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) and shall be
consistent with the State Growth Management Act (GMA).
b. The County or a City may propose a policy amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies.
2. Proposed amendments should be considered on a regular basis and voting is subject to the Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council by -laws.
a. Kitsap County shall take action to consider and adopt amendments or revisions to the
Countywide Planning Policies following recommendation from the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council.
b. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council will strive for ratification by all Cities and Tribes
during the 90 days following the Board of County Commissioners' adoption of its subject
ordinance. The adopted CPP will become effective upon ratification by three or more cities in
Kitsap County.
c. A City or Tribal Council that does not ratify the revised Countywide Planning Policies within
90 days of the Board of County Commissioners' adoption of its subject ordinance shall
provide a written statement of its objections to the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, in
order to facilitate further review. (See Appendix A for process flow chart).
d. Once the ratified revisions to the Countywide Planning Policies take effect, a City or the
Governor's office may appeal the revisions to the Growth Management Hearings Board
within a further 60 day period.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
49 2007
Element A. Countywide Growth Pattern
The vision for the future of Kitsap County, as ar-fiettlated i the Kitsap Ceti,., Cempfehensive Pla
{199$} "seeks to maintain and enhance the quality of life that makes our County a special place to live and
work...... envision a future in which our natural systems are protected; the water quality in our lakes, streams
and
Puget Sound is enhanced; the village character of some of our smaller towns is preserved; the historical
nature of our communities is respected in order to preserve our heritage for future generations; a diversified
economic base that supports good jobs, contributes to healthy downtowns in our cities and affordable
housing choices; the rural appearance of our county is perpetuated.
This vision of the future, shared by citizens and elected officials, includes the following elements:
a. Livable urban communities and neighborhoods, centers for employment, civic activities, housing:
Attractive, well designed, bike /pedestrian - friendly and livable urban communities, enhanced by
preserved historic properties and neighborhoods, that are supported by efficient and high quality
services and facilities, and provide a range of housing choices.
Healthy cities that are the region's centers for employment, affordable housing choices, and
civic and cultural activities.
b. Vital diversified economy: An economv that provides training, education, and living wage jobs for
residents, supported by adequate buildable land for a range of employment uses and that encourages
accomplishment of local economic development goals as articulated in the Kitsap Economic
Development Alliance's adopted plan, Kitsap 20120: A Strategy for Sustainable Economic Prosperity.
C. Efficient multi -modal transportation system: Creation of an efficient, clean, and sustainable multi -
modal transportation system — including roads and highways, public transportation, ferries, airports, and
opportunities for non - motorized travel — that provides efficient access and mobility for county
residents, andsupports our land use pattern.
d. Natural systems protection:
Protection and enhancement of the natural environment, including wetlands, streams, wildlife
habitat, shorelines, water quality, air, climate, and natural resource ^^e lands.
Creation of a system of open space, trails, parks, and greenbelts that provide opportunities for
recreation and that give structure and separation to urban areas.
C. Rural character: Maintenance of the traditional character, appearance, economic and ecologica
functions, and lifestyles of Kitsap County's rural communities and areas to include the production and
distribution of locally r� food.
f. Responsive Government: An efficient and responsive government that works in partnership with
citizens, governmental entities and Tribes to meet collective needs fairly; and that supports education,
environmental protection and human services.
A key strategy to accomplish this vision is the intention to encourage future urban growth in areas within
incorporated cities and in unincorporated areas that are already characterized by urban growth with existing
and planned services and facilities. These actions will work to strengthen our natural environment and rural
character, and are geared to reduce taxpayer costs by focusing the expenditure of public funds, encouraging
concentrated development where appropriate, and increasing our choices for housing and jobs."
..•
Balancing historical patterns of growth with a preferred vision of the future and legal requirements
is an on -going challenge. Tradeoffs must be made to balance the costs with the gains; flexibility is
necessary to adapt to changing conditions. These policies are intended to reflect the long -term
goals of the people living, working and doing business here.
Policies for Countywide Growth Pattern (CV)
1. Roles of Cities and Urban Growth Areas /Urban Communities
a. The primary role of Kitsap's urban communities is to encourage growth, through new
development, re- development and in -fill. (See Appendix B for current and projected
population distribution) growth should be directed to Cities, urban growth areas
and centers with a transportation system that connects people with jobs and housing
b. Each of Kitsap's urban communities should foster its unique vision as a high quality place to
live and work, through urban design, historic preservation, and arts that improve the natural
and human -made environments; promote healthy lifestyles; contribute to a prosperous
economy; and, increase the region's resiliency in adapting to changes or adverse events
c. In Kitsap, urban communities are closely linked to water and natural amenities and provide
open space links to the natural environment.
2. Roles ofKitsapCounty:
a. Keep regional vision in mind when making local decisions.
b. Promote stewardship of unincorporated urban areas and promote tfaiis .ii to e iti s N,het
(inane ally viable annexation into cities or incorporation.
c. Maintain /enhance natural systems and rural character.
d. Include a variety of low density rural communities, densities, and uses.
3. To achieve these goals, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council member jurisdictions
should:
a. Make decisions together when needed.
b. Coordinate and cooperate on land use—,policy. capital planning environmental issues, and
cultural resource mana e�/planning.
c. Establish and keep updated a Buildable Land Analysis Program.
d. Develop a program for the Transfer of Development Rights to preserve lands with
important public benefits.
e. Maintain /preserve distinct urban identities with green breaks or other natural features.
f. Promote tiering and /or phasing of infrastructure development within Urban Growth Areas.
g. Develop and implement land use policies, regulations and incentives to promote the
efficient use of urban areas.
h. Incorporate provisions addressing community health into appropriate regional,
countywide, and local planning and decision- making processes.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
49 2007
Element B. Urban Growth Areas
The basic premise for designating Urban Growth Areas is to encourage the location of urban density
residential, commercial and industrial developments in areas where services can be most
economically provided. The benefits of directing growth to designated urban areas include:
* Higher density residential development within walking or bicycling distance of jobs, transit,
schools and parks.
* Limiting urban expansion into rural and forested areas.
* Promotion of in -fill or redevelopment of existing urban areas.
* Preservation of open space, critical areas and lands designated for resource protection.
* Accommodation of employment growth in a concentrated pattern.
* More economical provision and maintenance of streets, sewer/ water lines and other public
facilities.
* Promotion of attractive residential neighborhoods and commercial districts which provide a
sense of community.
* A harmonious relationship with regional planning as articulated by Vision 20292040
Destination 2030 Transportation 2040, adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council as the
growth and transportation strategy for central Puget Sound.
Policies for Urban Growth Areas (UGA)
1. Land Utilization & Monitoring Programs:
Consistent with RCW 36.70A.115, the County and
Cities shall ensure that, taken collectively, adoption of
and amendments to their comprehensive plans and /or
development regulations provide sufficient capacity of
land suitable for development within their jurisdictions
to accommodate their housing and employment growth
(derived from population distribution), as adopted in
the applicable Countywide Planning Policies and
consistent with the 20 -year population forecast from the
WA Office of Financial Management and Vision 2040
guidance. (Implements Multi - County Planning Policy
DP Action -15).
a. The County and the Cities shall maintain a Land
Capacity Analysis Program using consistent,
agreed -upon methodology to estimate the land
supply available to accommodate future residential,
commercial, and industrial growth.
b. The County and the Cities shall participate in an
agreed -upon Buildable Lands Analysis Program to
monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their
respective Comprehensive Plans.
c. The County and Cities shall establish procedures
for resolving disputes in collection and analysis of
Land Capacity data. In the event a resolution cannot
be achieved, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Recommended to
Background: The Growth Management
Act was amended in 1997 requiring Kitsap
County and Cities to monitor countywide
development activities in five -year
intervals in order to test their
Comprehensive Plans' growth and land
absorption assumptions. Two different
analyses are used: (1) The Land Capacity
Analysis, first conducted by Kitsap County
in 2002, estimates the existing land supply
based on a set of defined assumptions, e.g.
market factor, speed of land absorption,
critical areas exclusions, etc. It uses a
consistent, agreed -upon methodology, with
allowance for documented variations for
individual jurisdiction's conditions. (2)
The Buildable Land Analysis (as required
by the State GMA) uses recorded permit
activity to track and monitor residential,
commercial, and industrial growth. It will
be updated throughout Kitsap County in
2007. It is an adaptive management tool for
comparing development assumptions,
targets, and objectives with actual
development. If inconsistencies are found,
the County and Cities must then implement
reasonable measures, other than adjusting
Urban Growth Areas, that will be taken in
order to comply with the GMA. The
following countywide planning policies
relate to this regional program to monitor
the buildable land supply for future growth
as forecasted by the State and distributed
through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council process.
Council shall be a forum to review and if possible facilitate any disputes between parties.
2. Each jurisdiction is responsible for implementing appropriate reasonable measures
within its jurisdictional boundaries. If the Buildable Lands Analysis shows that a
jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan growth goals are not being met, that jurisdiction shall
consider implementing additional reasonable measures in order to use its designated
urban land more efficiently.
3. Process and criteria for establishing, expanding, and adjusting Urban Growth Areas in
Kitsap County:
a. Urban Growth Areas are areas "within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside
of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature" (RCW 36.70A.110(1)) except
under specific circumstances, as fully contained communities and master planned resorts as
authorized by the Growth Management Act.
b. Unincorporated Urban Growth Areas shall be associated with an existing or future
city.
c. All Urban Growth Areas shall be reflected in County and respective City comprehensive
plans.
d. Sufficient area must be included in the Urban Growth Areas to accommodate the adopted
20 -year population distribution as adopted by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
and consistent with WA Office of Financial Management projections.
e. A jurisdiction may define growth tiers within its Urban Growth Area (RCW 36.70A.110.3)
to focus public and /or private investment where growth is desired. Utility development
and /or expansion may be phased to support efficient and cost - effective growth and to
prioritize investments.
f The County, City, or interested citizens may initiate an amendment to an existing Urban
Growth Area through the comprehensive plan amendment process as authorized by the
Growth Management Act.
g. Any jurisdiction seeking to expand its Urban Growth Area shall achieve densities and
urban growth patterns consistent with the Growth Management Act and the City's adopted
Comprehensive Plan and any inter -local agreement between the City and the County.
h. If an adopted or proposed, 20 -year projected population distribution requires the expansion
of its Urban Growth Area, the respective jurisdiction shall conduct planning and analysis,
addressing the following conditions:
Update and confirm the capacity analysis for land within the existing Urban Growth
Area for residential, commercial, and /or industrial lands, which takes into account all
development approved within the overall UGA since the last UGA expansion. This
shall be based upon updated Buildable Land and Land Capacity Analyses that follow
the guidelines of RCW 36.70A.215 or other analysis determined appropriate for the
particular UGA involved. To maximize consistency across jurisdictions, each
jurisdiction shall use consistent methodology in calculating capacity.
ii. Review the planning and zoning regulations and any incentive programs in place to
determine expected densities and urban growth patterns in the existing UGA consistent
with the Growth Management Act and the jurisdiction's adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
8 i,zrdcn4o�; 49 2007
iii. Determine whether the adoption and implementation of suitable reasonable measures
should be considered, if the Buildable Land Analysis shows that its Comprehensive
Plan growth goals are not being met.
iv. Data collection and analysis for the Land Capacity Analysis should be done
cooperatively. The County will be responsible for data describing growth and capacity
in the unincorporated portion of the Urban Growth Area, and the City for the
incorporated portion.
i. Expansion of Urban Growth Areas shall direct growth first to areas already characterized
by urban growth that have adequate existing public facility and service capabilities to serve
development; second to areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served
adequately by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any
additional needed public facilities and services that are provided; and third to areas that are
adjacent to incorporated cities or established Urban Growth Areas once the available land
meeting the first or second priority has been designated. Areas which have existing public
facilities or where public facilities can be reasonably extended and are not currently at
urban densities should be considered first within this category.
j. A jurisdiction, as part of its Comprehensive Plan amendment or Subarea Plan process, that
proposes an expansion of the UGA shall prepare or update a comparison of potential areas
for expansion, including.
i. Planning and zoning regulations currently in place.
ii. An evaluation of how a full range of urban -level infrastructure and services would
be provided within potential expansion areas, including appropriate capital facility
analysis.
Fire Storm Water Solid Waste
Police Potable Water Park & Recreation Facilities
Transportation Sewer Schools
Utilities: Power and Telecommunications, including Broadband
Emergency Medical Services
All service providers including special districts and adjacent jurisdictions should be
included in the evaluation. Best available infrastructure technology may be used
provided that it has been approved by the jurisdiction as part of a broader review of
available technology.
iii. Although specific standards and criteria are not implied, other factors shall be
addressed in evaluating areas for Urban Growth Area expansion, including but not
limited to: environmental constraints; economic development; preservation of
cultural, historical, and designated resource lands.
k. The City and County shall conduct early and continuous public involvement when
establishing, expanding, or adjusting Urban Growth Areas, and shall do so jointly when
appropriate. Residents of unincorporated areas should be consulted and actively involved
in the process affecting them.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
49 2007
4. Coordinated Growth Management in Urban Growth Areas:
a. Adopted City and County comprehensive plans shall reflect the intent that all land within
unincorporated Urban Growth Areas will either annex to a city or incorporate within the
20 -year planning horizon.
b. To maximize the efficient use of urban lands, subdivisions in Urban Growth Areas shall be
consistent with the associated jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan and underlying zoning
densities.
c. As described in the Growth Management Act, cities are the primary provider of municipal
services and facilities in their Urban Growth Areas, responsible for demonstrating within
their Comprehensive Plans the capacity to provide all urban services within their associated
Urban Growth Area(s). This may be accomplished through a collaborative process with
Kitsap County and /or other service providers.
d. The County and Cities shall establish procedures to facilitate the smooth transfer of
governance for associated Urban Growth Area(s) through the adoption of Urban Growth
Area Management Agreements (UGAMAs), as per Appendix C: Urban Growth Area
Management Agreements.
e. For Urban Growth Areas
i. The County should plan with associated cities and local communities to address land
uses, infrastructure needs, level of service standards as identified in these policies,
and other issues as needed. The results should be reflected in the County
Comprehensive Plan.
ii. The County should ee nfititte provide a level of urban facilities and services
consistent with the County's ability and appropriateness to provide such services
gener-a ° cleat to these of eifies en an i ntefim basis for those Urban Growth
Areas that will be associated with a specific city or that will eventually incorporate.
a nd on an en goin ba ate
5. Distribution of 20 year population increments, as forecasted by the WA Office of
Financial Management:
a. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall coordinate the process for distributing the
forecasted population for the period 2005 — 2025 and every five years thereafter, consistent
with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. Kitsap County shall adopt any
revision to the population distribution as part of its next Comprehensive Plan amendment
process and the Cities shall base their Comprehensive Plan amendments upon that
distribution. The distribution process should consider countywide demographic analysis,
the Land Capacity Analysis, and the OFM projections and it shall promote a countywide
development pattern targeting over three quarters (76 %) of new population growth to the
designated Urban Growth Areas. The County and the Cities recognize that the success of
this development pattern requires not only the rigorous support of Kitsap County in the
rural areas, but also Cities' Comprehensive Plans being designed to attract substantial new
population growth.
Population distribution will be reviewed through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
process every five years. The review will include an analysis of the Cities' and County's
progress in achieving target distributions. If the 76% UGA target mentioned above for new
population growth and the overall population targets are met or exceeded, the target for
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
10 "�, o-P,V- 49 2007
new population will revert to five sixths (83 %), as per the revised County -wide Planning
Policies adopted by Kitsap County Ordinance 9258 -01 on August 20, 2001. Otherwise, the
target may be reaffirmed or explicitly modified.
b. Each jurisdiction with a designated Urban Growth Area shall develop an estimate and /or
range of the additional population that it could accommodate and service during the 20 year
planning horizon, consistent with its vision for future community character. The estimate
shall consider the need for increasing population density within the Urban Growth Areas to
promote efficient service delivery, avoid sprawl, and preserve community character.
c. The population estimates and /or ranges shall be provided to the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council, with a statement of need concerning adjusted Urban Growth Area
boundaries.
d. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall compile the jurisdictions' population
estimates, including the estimate of additional population capacity for areas outside the
Urban Growth Areas, and determine whether adjustments to the overall distribution are
required in order to fit within the OFM projected range.
e. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, after conducting a public hearing, shall
recommend the estimate and /or ranges of 20 year population distribution to Kitsap County
for adoption as an amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies.
f. Kitsap County should give substantial weight to the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council's recommendation in adopting the 20 -year population distribution.
g. Following adoption of the estimates and /or ranges, each jurisdiction should update its
comprehensive plan, so as to arrive at a final population target consistent with the estimate
and /or within the original range.
h. After each jurisdiction has completed its comprehensive plan update, the final adopted
target should be compiled and reviewed through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
process and the revised population distribution incorporated into the Countywide Planning
Policies. A final distribution to Urban Growth Areas versus non -Urban Growth Areas
within the range specified above should then be calculated.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
11 rr , 49 2007
110 1
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
11 rr , 49 2007
6. Policies for Growth Outside of Urban Growth Areas: Fully Contained Communities,
National Historic Towns, and Master Planned Resorts
a. A Master Plan review Process and
decision criteria for fully contained
communities, national historic
towns, and master planned resorts
should be incorporated in the
County's comprehensive plan,
must reflect the standards and
requirements in the GMA and in
addition must address the
ollowin :
i. Provision of necessary public
facilities, including but not
limited to parks, schools, and
public safety_ facilities should be
provided within or aloe with
the development, consistent
with adopted capital facility
and level of service standards;
ii. Future assessment of adverse
impacts to public infrastructure,
nearby communities, ad
iacent
rural areas, environmental
Under the Growth Management Act ( RCW 36.70A .350),
fully contained communities (FCCs) may be considered,
provided that a portion of the twenty -year population
forecast is reserved for & subsequently distributed to the
FCC. The GMA requires that FCCs provide for a mix of
uses that would provide jobs, housing, & public facilities
and services to support a long -term residential population.
The GMA ( RCW 36.70A .360) also allows the consideration
of proposed master planned resorts (MPR's) outside of
Urban Growth Areas for shorter -term residential uses.
Master planned resorts are described as self - contained, fully
integrated planned developments in areas with significant
natural amenities.
The GMA allows for areas with a federal landmark
designation to be developed as National Historic Towns
(RCW 36.70A.520). The designation may allow urban
services in rural areas dependent upon historic development
pattern. Its boundaries and land uses must be consistent
with those over the course of its history, but not specific to
anv point in time.
Vision 2040 policies state that new FCC's are to be avoided
resources, and designated resource lands. Such impacts should first be avoided, second
minimized, and third mitigated;
iii. Provisions for review of such developments through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council process, in addition to other procedural requirements.
b. Consistent with guidance Provided in VISION 2040. the Kitsap Regional Coordinatin
Council shall avoid the establishment of a Fully Contained Community (FCC). Only if it is
found necessary to accommodate future urban population growth, may the Kitsap Re io�nal
Coordinating Council recommend the creation of an FCC and a corresponding new
community reserve population. Any such designation shall be fully consistent with all
Countywide Planning Policies establishing new Urban Growth Areas (Elements B3 and B5)
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
12 49 2007
and RCW 36.70A.350(2), which, in part, requires that a new community reserve population
be established no more than once everyfive years as a part of the designation or review off'
Urban Growth Areas and that the Urban Growth Areas shall be accordingly offset.
In addition, the following shall be included in any County Comprehensive Plan
requirements governing FCCs:
i. a phasing plan that monitors and requires concurrent development of commercial and
employment uses with residential development, to insure that the community is fully
contained;
ii. a mechanism to insure that the timid of the development components will be fully
regulated by the phasing plan;
iii. a substantial public benefit.
c. As Vision 2040 requires comprehensive review and consideration of the regional impacts of
any proposed Fully Contained Community, the County shall forward the proposal to
adjacent counties, the Puget Sound Regional Council, and the Kitsap Regi
Coordinating Council for review at the earliest possible point in the process. The Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council shall review the proposal for regional impacts to the
ollowin :
i. the re io�nal growth strategy as included in Vision 2040;
ii. the split in population growth between the countywide urban and rural areas;
iii. other elements of the Countywide Planning Policies.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
13 49 2007
Element C: Centers of Growth
Centers are intended to be compact and centralized working, shopping and /or activity areas linked
to other Centers by transit and non - motorized facilities. [See H. Transportation: 5 -61 Centers and
their boundaries are intended to be locally determined by the County and the Cities where a
community -wide focal point can be provided, significant population and /or employment growth
can be located, and the increased use of transit, walking and bicycling can be supported.
Designated Centers are intended to define the pattern of future residential and
commercial /industrial growth and incorporate opportunities or parks, civic, and public space
development in Kitsap County.(See Appendix F for listing of Kitsap Designated Centers.)
Policies for Centers of Growth (C):
1. In decisions relating to population growth
and resource allocation supporting
growth, Centers have a high priority.
2. The Kitsap Countywide Planninz Policies
encouraze the development of Centers
accordinz to the followinz typoloy
The Puget Sound Regional Council has
defined several types of Regional Centers
within Urban Growth Areas in the four - county
planning region, with planning guidelines
( Vision 2040) Appendix 1 ).
a. Regional rye Growth Centers
Metropolitan Centers .
" Metfopelita Ceftter^ function as anchors within the region for a high density mix of
business, residential, public, cultural and recreational uses, and day and night activity.
They are characterized by their historic role as the central business districts of the major
cities within the central Puget Sound region, providing services for and easily
accessible to a population well beyond their city limits. Metro Centers may also serve
national or international roles." (Vision 2040)
ii. Urban Centers are areas with
the comprehensive planning to support a wide range of commercial, housing, and
cultural choices. All areas of the Urban Center are serviced by transit throughout the
day and much of the area is within walking or bicycling distance. Significant in -fill
opportunities exist with the highest residential, commercial, and employment densities
expected. (Vision 2040)
b. Regional Manufacturing /Industrial Centers . " Regi
M. ntt e ng /l fi " is r °N*°rs are major, existing regional employment areas of
intensive, concentrated manufacturing and industrial land uses which cannot be easily
mixed at higher densities with other incompatible uses. To preserve and maximize land at
these centers for manufacturing, industry and related uses, large retail uses or non - related
offices are discouraged. Provision of adequate public facilities and services, including
good access to the region's transportation system, is very important to the success of
manufacturing /industrial centers. " (Vision 2040)
c. The following are other types of centers within Kitsap County:
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
14 49 2007
Town or City Centers are usually the existing downtown core of a city or Urban
Growth Area. There is an abundant mix of shopping, service, employment, and cultural
opportunities. Multifamily housing may be intermixed and single family housing may
be within walking or bicycling distance. Infill should include mixed use and higher
densities surrounding the Town Center.
ii. Mixed Use Centers are a generic category that can be described in terms of
neighborhoods or districts within a city or Urban Growth Area. The designation
represents a commitment to planning for Center development, with a planned mix of
housing, commercial, service, and employment opportunities. Most shopping and
commercial uses are within a short walking or bicycling distance of housing. There is a
higher proportion of multi - family housing at relatively high densities. Navy facilities
could be considered for this designation.
iii. Activity and Employment Centers are areas of concentrated employment and are a
magnet for significant numbers of people usually during daytime hours because of
business and /or manufacturing activities. They may be located outside of Urban
Growth Areas, consistent with the Growth Management Act. Industrial and business
parks and Navy employment centers are in this category. Within Urban Growth Areas,
the opportunity to include a proportional residential element should be determined on a
case -by -case basis, considering the unique geography and economics of the area.
iv. Transportation Hubs are locations of regional inter -modal connection that may be
located outside of Urban Growth Areas. Examples are ferry terminals, the Bremerton
National Airport, or certain transit stations.
3. Recomnizinz that communities evolve over time, a jurisdiction may request of the Kitsap
Rezional Coordinatinz Council an initial desi ' -nation or a chap ' -e in Center status. This
request shall be considered and a decision made durinz the next Countywide Planning
Policies amendment cycle. A chanZe in Center status may require action by the Puzet Sound
Rezional Council.
4. ,
er-iter-ia for- designating loeal eenter-s should be developed and eooFdittated thr-ough the
Vvitsap Regional Coordinating . In addition to meeting the applicable criteria above,
a request for Center desi ,-nation or a chanze in Center status should address the following
should be ineluded: (See Appendix G)
a. Current or programmed transportation
resources (including roads, ferries,
transit, airports, bicycle, pedestrian)
b. Balance of living wage employment
opportunities with residential
c. Proximity and connectivity among jobs,
housing, retail services
d. Types and density of residential uses
e. Inclusion of affordable housing
f. Provision of community gathering
space, parks, and cultural opportunities
g. Impacts to ecological functions.
Living wage is the minimum hourly wage
needed by a sole provider working full time
(2080 hours per near) to cover the costs of
food, shelter, clothing, and other basic
necessities or their amily. The assumption
is that living emery across
communities, based on di[ferences in the
cost of living and size of household.
(Sources: Economic Policy Institute &KEDAI
Livinz Waze: Living Waize Calculator for
Kitsap County, Pennsylvania State University
htlp://www.livingwage.geog.psu.edu/
Minimum Waze: WA State Dept ofLabor
15
Element D: Rural Land Uses and Development Patterns
Rural areas of Kitsap County are characterized as having a variety of parcel sizes, with a diversity
of land use activities. These areas also contain significant amounts of complex natural systems. It
is a high priority to preserve and enhance the rural character of these areas. Counties are
responsible for designating and regulating rural areas through the comprehensive planning process.
However, rural preservation is a regional issue and it is important to coordinate these planning
objectives with the Cities.
Policies for Rural Land Uses and Development Patterns (R):
1. Preserving rural character and enhancing the natural environment.
a. Preserve the character of identified rural areas by protecting and enhancing the natural
environment, open spaces, recreational opportunities, and scenic and historic areas.
Support mp g -small scale farming and working resource land, promote locall grown
ood forestry eco- and heritage- tourism. Support low- density
residential living and cluster development maintained by levels of 3eFvi^° rt
R,,,.,,' r,.ri, t .,.,',.,.abet., that provides for a mix of housing types, rural levels of
service, cultural activities, and employment that services the needs of rural areas at a size
and scale that is compatible with long -term character, productivity ,and use of these lands
b. This policy is not intended to preclude the future designation of Urban Growth Areas.
2. Preserving rural land use and development patterns:
a. Rural Communities are already- existing residential and commercial areas of more
intensive rural development designated in the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan under
RCW 36.70A.070.5. In -fill is expected. Rural Communities should be serviced by
transportation providers and other services consistent with the Levels of Service adopted by
Kitsap County for roads and by Kitsap Transit for transit upon their designation as an area
of more intensive rural development.
b. Transportation Hubs may be located within existing areas of more intensive
development. Walking, bicycling, and transit are the major forms of travel. Transportation
Hubs are locations of regional intermodal connection. Examples are ferry terminals and
transit stations with convenience services.
c. The County shall develop criteria consistent with the Growth Management Act for
designating future industrial and commercial development outside of Urban Growth Areas
that protect rural character while encouraging vehicle trip reduction. The criteria should
allow for industrial resource -based land use and recreation and for convenience commercial
that is scaled to serve the daily needs of rural residents.
3. Establishing and maintaining rural levels of service:
a. Rural level -of- service standards shall address sewage disposal, water, transportation and
other appropriate services. The standards shall be developed based upon levels of service
typically delivered in rural areas consistent with RCW 36.70A.030 (16).
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
16 49 2007
b. For purpose of trip reduction, develop a range of alternative modes of transportation
consistent with rural levels of service to connect Rural Communities with urban Centers.
c. When sewers need to be extended to solve isolated health, environmental, and sanitation
problems, they shall be designed for limited access so as not to increase the development
potential of the surrounding rural area.
4. Conserving small -scale natural resource use in rural areas:
a. Rural land use designations in the County's Comprehensive Plan sheaf shall recognize
ecological functions and support rural uses such as farming, forestry, mining, recreation, and
other rural activities, and permit a variety of low- density residential uses which preserve rural
character and ecological functions and can be sustained by rural service levels.
b. The County's Comprehensive Plan policies shall promote clustering residential development
and other techniques to protect and enhance significant open spaces, natural resources,
cultural resources, and critical areas for more effiei 44- ective use of the land. Clustering
should not increase residential housing units in the overall area designated as rural, consistent
with designated rural densities. Development clusters shall be designed, scaled and sited in a
manner consistent with rural character and the provision of rural levels of service.
c. The County's Comprehensive Plan policies shall support Rural Communities as locations of
employment, a mix of housing types, and cultural activities for rural areas that primarily
function as locations for service needs such as grocery stores, shopping, and community
services, and small -scale cottage industries for the surrounding rural area.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
17 49 2007
Element E. Countywide Strategies for Open Space Preservation, Resource Preservation,
Critical Areas, Air Quality, and Water Quality /Quantity
Open space is defined as land area consisting of natural systems, resource lands and critical areas
that include building limitations for future development. These critical areas include wetlands,
wildlife conservation areas, steep slopes, frequently flooded areas and areas with a critical
recharging affect. These open space lands also include aesthetic functions such as view sheds of
the water or ridgelines. Many of these natural systems are inter - connected and cross multi -
jurisdictional boundaries within the County. The strategy is to conserve these areas and connect
them to create a regional open space network to protect critical areas, conserve natural resources,
and preserve lands and resources of countywide and local significance. The purpose of these
strategies is to enhance the quality of countywide water, soil ,and air resources and, potentially,
climate_
Policies for Open Space Preservation, Resource Protection, mW Critical Areas, Air, and
Water Ouality/Ouantity (PPCAA W)
1. Creating a regional network of open space:
a. The County and the Cities shall implement the Kitsap County Open Space Plan and the
Kitsap County Consolidated Greenway Plan which identify a countywide green space
strategy that incorporates planning efforts of the County, Cities, state agencies, non - profit
interest groups and land trusts in the County.
b. The County and the Cities shall preserve and enhance, through inter jurisdictional
planning, significant networks and linkages of open space, regional parks and
public /private recreation areas, wildlife habitats, critical areas and resource lands; historic
and cultural landscapes; water bodies and trails.
c. The County and the Cities shall frame and separate urban areas by creating and preserving
a permanent network of urban and rural open space, including parks, recreation areas,
critical areas and resource lands.
2. Conserving and enhancing the County's natural resources, critical areas, water
quality / quantity and environmental amenities while planning for and accommodating
sustainable growth:
b-.a. The County and the Cities shall protect critical areas (wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, fish
and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, steep slopes, and
geologically hazardous areas) and should consider other environmental amenities such as
view corridors, canopy cover, and ridgelines.
e. The County and the Cities shall establish and implement Best Management Practices to
protect the long -term integrity of the natural environment, adjacent land use, and the
productivity of resource lands.
d. The County and the Cities shall establish procedures to preserve significant historic, visual
and cultural resources including views, landmarks, archaeological sites, and areas of special
locational character.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
18 49 2007
e. d. The County and the Cities shall encourage the use of environmentally sensitive
development practices to minimize the impacts of growth on the County's natural resource
systems.
e. The County and the Cities shall protect and enhance the public health and safety and the
environment for all residents, regardless of social or economic status, by reducing
pollutants, as defined by WA State and federal law.
f. The County and the Cities shall work together to identify, protect, and restore networks of
natural habitat areas and functions that cross jurisdictional boundaries.
g_The County and Cities shall protect and enhance ecosystems that support Washington State's
Priority Habitat and Species as identified by the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife.
3. Protection of air quality is accomplished by reducing the levels of toxins, fine particles, and
Qreenhouse -ases released into the environment, especially throuzh transportation activities.
a. The County and Cities, in their respective comprehensive plans, should include specific
goals and policies to enhance air quality by reducing the release of toxins, . fine particles,
and greenhouse gases.
b. The County and Cities should adopt and implement purchasing policies /pro r� for
vehicles /equipment that use clean e(ficient fuels.
4. Protection of water quality and quantity is accomplished by reducinz the amount of toxins
and pathomens in our water supply.
a. The County and Cities should adopt policies in their Comprehensive Plans to reflect that
surface and storm water and aquifer recharge areas should be treated as a resource.
b. The County and Cities should continue to be models or low impact development and
implement such prggrams whenever practical.
c. The County and Cities should develop and implement a program, as funding allows and
where feasible, to retrofit infrastructure that was developed prior to the implementation of
best practices in surface and storm water mana e�programs.
-3. 5.Listed species recovery under the Endangered Species Act (ESA):
a. The County and the Cities shall preserve, protect, and where possible, restore the functions
of natural habitat to support ESA - listed species, through the adoption of comprehensive
plan policies, critical area ordinances, shoreline master programs and other development
regulations that seek to protect, maintain or restore aquatic ecosystems associated habitats
and aquifer through the use of management zones, development regulations, incentives for
voluntary efforts of private landowners and developers, land use classifications or
designations, habitat acquisition programs or habitat restoration projects.
b. The County and the Cities shall provide incentive -based non - regulatory protection efforts
such as acquisition of priority habitats through fee - simple and conservation easements from
willing sellers.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
19 49 2007
c. The County and the Cities shall jointly establish and implement monitoring and evaluation
program to determine the effectiveness of restoration, enhancement, and recovery strategies
for salmon including ESA - listed species. Each jurisdiction shall apply an adaptive
management strategy to determine how well the objectives of listed species recovery and
critical habitat preservation/restoration are being achieved.
4. 6.Coordination of watershed and land use planning:
a. The County and the Cities shall participate in a planning program that determines changes
in stream hydrology and water quality under different land use scenarios at full build -out of
designated land use classifications.
b. The County and the Cities shall coordinate land use planning using watersheds or natural
drainage basins to implement strategies for restoration of aquatic habitat and to reduce
impacts to other natural systems and participate in efforts to improve the health of our
waterways
c. Kitsap County shall coordinate and maintain a regional database of best available science
for the purpose of modifying Critical Areas Ordinances, if funding is available.
d. Upon adoption of a state classification system, the Cities and the County shall establish a
single system for stream typing.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
20 49 2007
Element F. Contiguous, Compatible, and Orderly Development
Upon designation of Urban Growth Areas, the County and Cities will need to develop consistent
implementation measures to ensure that development occurs in an orderly and contiguous manner.
The intent of the following countywide planning policies is to minimize differences in urban
development regulations and standards between the County and the Cities and to facilitate the
economical provision of urban services to development.
Policies for Contiguous. Compatible .and Orderlv Development (CCOD):
1. Encouragement of cooperative inter - jurisdictional planning by federal, tribal, state, local,
and special purpose government:
a. Inter jurisdictional discussion, information exchange, and coordination of proposals shall
be initiated as early and expeditiously as possible by the responsible agencies, to aid in the
smooth transition ofgovernance.
b. Initial inventories and analyses of utilities and public services information are critical to the
planning process and shall be made available as early and expeditiously as possible by the
responsible agencies.
c. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council may establish or designate on -going technical
committee(s) comprised of representatives from utilities and service providers to
investigate long -range regional needs for various facilities and services, including but not
limited to those for transportation, sewer and storm drainage, availability and delivery of
potable water, solid waste, broadband, parks and recreation, and open space.
d. The Countywide Planning Policies will further the implementation of Vision 20202040
D est i tiat et 2030 Transportation 2040 as adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council.
2. Inter - regional coordination of land use and transportation, environmental, and
infrastructure p lanning:
a. The County and the Cities shall participate in the Puget Sound Regional Council and the
Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization.
b. Locally - generated data shall be provided to the Puget Sound Regional Council and the
Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization for use in their coordination of
population forecasts, land use, and transportation.
c. The planning proposals of these regional organizations shall be monitored and adjustments
recommended to insure that they accurately reflect local needs and plans.
d. Recognize and work with corridors that cross jurisdictional boundaries (including natural
systems, and transportation and infrastructure systems) in communio� planniLig,
development, and desj n
3. Fiscal equity:
a. It is recognized that fiscal disparities exist as a result of growth and changes in municipal
boundaries. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall monitor the Revenue Sharing
Inter -local Agreement among the County and Cities (shown as Appendix D) and seek
additional ways to address fiscal disparities as they relate to promoting coordinated
development and the implementation of the Growth Management Act.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
21 49 2007
b. The County and the Cities shall work together to insure that all fees associated with
development approval are based upon the real cost of service and act to encourage
development within designated Urban Growth Areas.
c. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall facilitate on -going regional discussion on
revenue equity issues.
4. Communiy design and development: Strategies should promote orderly development that
reflects the unique character of community and encourages healthy lifestyles through
building and site design and transportation connectivity. In addition, sustainable economic and
environmental development techniques should be utilized to enhance the quality of lid
a. Utilize design strategies to ensure that changes in the built environment provide
continuous and orderly development.
b. Encourage development that reflects unique local qualities and provides an economic
benefit to the community
c. Design mixed use developments and local street patterns to improve the environment for
overall mobility and accessibility to and within the development through multi -modal
transportation options that serve all users.
d. Design of transportation networks should fit within the context of the built and natural
environment, enhancing the community, connectivity, and physical activity in the area
community wide and sped acally in designated growth centers and high transit areas.
e. Design schools, institutions and public facilities to be compatible with the surrounding
community character and needs
f. Use sustainable building techniques (such as rehabilitation /re -use, LEED [Leadership in
Energy & Environmental Designl, Low Impact Development, ener— efficient fixtures, etc.)
in the design and development of the built environment.
g. Support urban design, historic preservation, and arts to enhance quality of life.
h. Promote solar, wind, tidal, wave generation, and other renewable enem generation where
appropriate to serve the community.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
22 49 2007
Element G. Siting Public Capital Facilities of a Countywide or Statewide Nat
The Growth Management Act requires local governments to inventory existing capital facilities
owned by public entities, to identify locations and to determine capacities to meet future demand
for growth without decreasing levels of service. The Washington State Office of Financial
Management is responsible for identifying and maintaining a list of essential state public facilities
that are required or likely to be built within the next six years as required by the Growth
Management Act. Counties and cities are also required to coordinate the siting of countywide and
statewide capital facilities to mitigate potential adverse impacts from the location and development
of these facilities.
Policies for Siting Public Capital Facilities (CF):
1. Identification of needed capital facilities:
a. The County and the Cities shall each inventory their existing capital facilities and identify
needed facility expansion and construction and provide that data to the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council.
b. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall develop and maintain a list of public
capital facilities needed to serve Kitsap County as a whole, based upon the County and
Cities' Comprehensive Plans, the Countywide Coordinated Water System Plan, and other
appropriate system plans. These include, but are not limited to, solid and hazardous waste
handling facilities and disposal sites, water and wastewater treatment facilities, regional
water supply inter -tie facilities, r-egieiial- education institutions, airports, local correctional
facilities, in- patient facilities including hospitals and regional park and recreation facilities,
and government buildings that serve Kitsap County as a whole, including those essential
public facilities as defined in RCW 36.70A.200.
2. Location of capital and public facilities
a. Lthe primary population served by the aciliby is urban, the aciliby should be located in a
City or Urban Growth Area where feasible.
3.Establishing a process and review criteria for the siting of facilities that are of a
countywide or statewide nature:
a. When essential public facility as defined in RCW 36.70A.200 is proposed in Kitsap
County, the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall appoint a Facility Analysis and
Site Evaluation Advisory Committee composed of citizen members selected by the member
jurisdictions to represent a broad range of interest groups to evaluate proposed public
facility siting. At a minimum this evaluation shall consider:
i. The impacts created by existing facilities;
ii. The potential for reshaping the economy, the environment and community character;
iii. The development of specific siting criteria for the proposed project, giving priority
consideration to siting within Designated Centers;
iv. The identification, analysis and ranking of potential project sites;
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
23 49 2007
v. Measures to first minimize and second mitigate potential physical impacts including,
but not limited to, those relating to land use, transportation, utilities, noise, odor and
public safety;
vi. Measures to first minimize and second mitigate potential fiscal impacts.
b. Certain public capital facilities such as schools and libraries that generate substantial travel
demand should be located first in Designated Centers or, if not feasible to do so, along or
near major transportation corridors and public transportation routes.
c. Some public capital facilities, such as those for waste handling, may be more appropriately
located outside of Urban Growth Areas due to exceptional bulk or potentially dangerous or
objectionable characteristics. Public facilities located beyond Urban Growth Areas should
be self - contained or be served by urban governmental services in a manner that will not
promote sprawl. Utility and service considerations must be incorporated into site planning
and development.
d. Uses shall adhere to local health district or state agency rules regarding commercial and
industrial use of on -site sewage systems.
e. The multiple use of corridors for major utilities, trails and transportation rights -of -way is
encouraged.
f. County and City comprehensive plans and development regulations shall not preclude the
siting of essential public facilities.
g. Public facilities shall not be located in designated resource lands, critical areas, or other
areas where the siting of such facilities would be incompatible.
4.Air transportation facilities in Kitsap County:
a. The Counties and the Cities shall recognize the importance of airports as essential public
facilities and the preservation of access to the air transportation system.
b. The County and the Cities shall ensure the safety of the community and airport users
through compatible land use planning adjacent to airports and coordination of the airport
with ground access. Examples would include not encouraging or supporting higher
residential densities, schools, or hospitals near airports or airport approach corridors.
c. The County and the Cities shall plan for heliports throughout Kitsap County for emergency
use.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
24 49 2007
Element H. Transportation
The Growth Management Act requires that transportation planning be coordinated among local
and state jurisdictions. The Growth Management Act further requires that transportation planning
be coordinated with the land use elements of local comprehensive plans. Coordination of land use
and transportation plans will allow Kitsap County and the Kitsap Cities to meet three inter - related
transportation goals:
o Serve Designated Centers to reduce sprawl, conserve land and make more efficient use of
infrastructure,
o Preserve the natural environment, including water air quality and, potentiall y. climate
o Provide a balanced system for the efficient, clean, safe movement of people, goods and
services among Designated Centers within Kitsap County and the larger Puget Sound
region.
The intent of the following policies is to define appropriate methods and strategies to achieve these
goals through inter - regional and intra- regional coordination among transportation and land use
planning agencies.
For the purpose of this Policy, the following transportation facilities are of countywide
significance:
a. state and federal highways;
b. major arterials;
c. public transit facilities and services;
d. non - motorized facilities connecting designated centers;
e. marine transportation facilities (ferries, shipping);
f. airports and heliports (passenger and /or freight);
g. rail facilities (passenger and /or freight)
The following facilities and system components should be included in the multi -modal network:
a. roads, including major highways, arterials and collectors;
b public transit, including bus, rail, and park & ride lots;
c. non - motorized facilities;
d. vehicle and public or private passenger only ferries;
e. airports;
f. parking facilities that support the multi -modal network;
g. facilities related to transportation demand management;
h. intelligent transportation systems (ITS).
Policies for Transportation (T):
1. Strategies to optimize and manage the sae use of transportation facilities and services:
a. The County and the Cities shall each emphasize the maintenance and preservation of their
existing transportation network.
b. Through the regular update of the Transportation Element of their Comprehensive Plan,
the County and the Cities should each identify Level of Service (LOS) and prioritize
operational and safety deficiencies, with the ,goal o f substantially reducing deaths and
serious injuries
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
25 49 2007
c. The County and the Cities should utilize Transportation System Management strategies
such as parking restrictions, traffic signal coordination, transit queue jumps (traffic signal
modification equipment that allows busses to move ahead of other vehicles), ramp
metering, striping non - motorized transportation facilities, traffic calming devices and real
time sensor adjustments for traffic signals.
d. The County and the Cities should develop and implement access management regulations
that provide standards for driveway spacing and delineation, and encourage the joint use of
access points where practical.
e.
The County and the Cities shall actively seek opportunities to share facilities, expertise,
and transportation resources, such as multiple use park& ride /parking lots or shared traffic
signal maintenance responsibility.
The State of Washington has taken steps to reduce
,greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles
traveled. Not only does reducing the overall amount
of travel produce benefits or improving air quality
and curbing emissions related to climate chance
also lessens traffic congestion. Developing a
transportation system that provides more
opportunities for walking, bicycling, or using transit
also creates more choices and options for people.
The WA State Dept of Transportation and
Vision 2040 policies identify telework (or tele-
commuting) as a viable transportation alternative.
The WSDOT - funded 2008 Kitsap Telework Pilot
Project noted the particular importance of telework
in rural areas, where citizens tend to drive greater
distances.
2. Reducing the rate of growth in auto
traffic, including the number of vehicle
trips, the number of miles traveled, and
the length of vehicle trips taken, for both
commute and non - commute trips:
a. The County and the Cities shall provide
both infra - structure and policy
incentives to increase the use of non-
SOV modes of travel.
The range of infrastructure
incentives to encourage the use of
non -SOV modes of travel could
include the following:
• Provide public transit, including
preferential treatments for
transit, such as queue by -pass
lanes (dedicated bus lanes that allow for transit queue jumps), traffic signal
modifications, and safe, transit stops.
• Provide integrated transfer points to facilitate seamless trips between transit and
other modes of travel, particularly at ferry terminals, including park & ride lots,bike
storage facilities, carpool /vanpool and transit advantages to ease ingress /egress,
with proximity to actual connection points, and innovative transit- oriented
development.
• Provide non - recreational bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including safe
neighborhood walking and biking routes to school.
• During the development of all state, county, and city highway capacity
improvement projects, consider the market for non -SOV travel, and the addition of
High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes, park & ride lots, appropriate infrastructure
for both bicycling and walking.
ii. The range of policy incentives to encourage the use of non -SOV modes of travel could
include the following:
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
26 49 2007
• Increased emphasis on the Commute Trip Reduction Program already in place
(including ridesharing incentives), with Kitsap Transit designated as the lead
agency, including program promotion and monitoring.
• Managed parking demand at ferry terminals, employment, and retail centers to
discourage SOV use through privileged parking for HOV users, fee structure and
parking space allocations.
• Encouraging telecommuting and home -based businesses as a viable work
alternative.
• Encouraging the shift of work and non -work trips to off -peak travel hours.
• Congestion pricing.
• Auto - restricted zones.
• Promotion of driver awareness through educational efforts.
d—.b.The County and the Cities shall develop standards
Complete Streets that address appfepfiate bicycle and
pedestrian facilities for development of new streets and
reconstruction of existing streets in Designate Genter^
and Rufal r,.r,mttn ties °s appropriate, consistent with
State law.
, Designated Centers, the jurisdictions should complete
missing vehicular and non - motorized links between key
arterials to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle
facilities, without compromising safety standards.
)Ld. The County and the Cities shall shetil develop
° °� bicycle and pedestrian systems plans, which
should be coordinated eensisten across jurisdictional
boundaries with particular consideration to providing
safe routes for children to walk and to bike to school.
VISION 2040 and Transportation
2040 emphasize Complete Streets,
which ensure that transportation
facilities serve all users and all
ages and abilities. By desiynig
and operating Complete Streets,
local jurisdictions provide
pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists,
and transit riders with safer travel
and can avoid expensive retrofits,
encourage physical activity and
help create walkable communities.
There is no singular desiZn
prescription or Complete Streets;
each one is unique and responds to
its community context.
&e. Kitsap Transit shall review and comment on Tr eases of stibsta -Hti ' fesidetitia °r
^' oir ni&ed mse development proposals where appropriate, Kitsap mr ^N^ ^4^"
_ Vft222q6 to facilitate convenient use and operation
of appropriate transit services.
3. Environmental impacts of transportation policies:
a. Transportation improvements shall be located and constructed so as to discourage /minimize
adverse impacts on water quality and other environmental features.
b. The County, the Cities, and Kitsap Transit shall consider programming capital
improvements and transportation facilities that alleviate and mitigate impacts o f on
air quality greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption, such as: high- occupancy
vehicle lanes; public transit; vanpool/ carpool facilities; electric and other low emission
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
27 49 2007
vehicles including buses; bicycle and pedestrian facilities that are designed for functional
transportation.
c. The County and the Cities shall ensure environmental protection, water quality, and
conformance with ESA requirements through best management practices throughout the
life of the transportation facilities, including:
i. Facility design, and in particular low impact development strategies or the collection
and treatment of storm water and surface run -off.
ii. Avoiding construction during the rainy season.
iii. Regular and routine maintenance of systems.
d. The County, the Cities, and Kitsap Transit should support Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
public education about anti - pollution measures.
4. Recognizing that the County and the Cities each encompass a range of development and
density patterns, each jurisdiction shall designate its Centers consistent with the criteria
set forth in Element C of the Countywide Planning Policies. The following policies relate
to planning guidelines to support transit and pedestrian travel appropriate to each type
of urban and rural development or re- development:
a. The County and the Cities shall each prepare development strategies for their Designated
Centers that encourage focused mixed use development and mixed type housing to achieve
densities and development patterns that support multi -modal transportation.
b. In Urban Growth Areas, comprehensive plans should promote pedestrian- and transit -
oriented development that includes access to alternative transportation and, in the interest
of safety and convenience, includes features, such as lighting, pedestrian buffers,
sidewalks, and access enhancements for physically challenged individuals.
c. Rural Communities etits de Tr,.ba- &ewth "real shall accommodate appropriate
pedestrian/bicycle connections and transit service and facilities consistent with rural levels
of service in order to minimize vehicle trips.
5. Transportation linkages between designated local and regional Centers:
a. Regional corridors shall be designated for automobile, freight, transit, HOV facilities, rail,
marine, bicycle, and pedestrian travel between centers as part of the countywide
transportation plan.
b. The transportation system linking Designated Centers within the county shall be transit -
oriented and pedestrian and bicycle friendly.
6. Freight transportation:
a. Preferred routes for the movement of freight shall be identified as part of the countywide
transportation plan.
b. The County and the Cities shall work to ensure that compatible land uses are applied along
designated freight corridors; including, but not limited to, corridors for air, rail, road and
marine traffic.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
28 49 2007
c. The County and the Cities shall use appropriate roadway standards for designated freight
corridors.
7. Transportation relationships with the Puget Sound Regional Council and the Peninsula
Regional Transportation Planning Organization:
a. The Countywide Planning Policies should support f, t4ef: the impl emeot 4 ^r
dopted regional and state plans and policies.
b. The County and the Cities shall actively participate in the Puget Sound Regional Council
and the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO) to assure that
transportation planning in the two regions is consistent and accurately reflects local needs
related to identified regional system components.
c. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall serve as the point of coordination to assure
Puget Sound Regional Council and Peninsula RTPO planning programs are consistent and
mutually beneficial to jurisdictions within Kitsap County.
d. The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Kitsap County shall continue to be a part
of the regional TIP adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council. Local review, comment
and recommendations shall be coordinated through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council.
8. Identification of needed transportation related facilities and services within Kitsap
County:
a. The Puget Sound Regional Council and the Peninsula RTPO shall identify regional system
components and related improvements within Kitsap County with the concurrence of the
Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council.
b. A countywide transportation plan developed by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
shall be prepared pursuant to the Growth Management Act to identify countywide
transportation facility and service needs. A technical committee including transit and local,
regional, and state transportation providers shall be used in this process.
9. Coordination of intra - county transportation planning efforts:
a. The Puget Sound Regional Council reviews Cities' and the County's Comprehensive plans
for consistency of land use and transportation elements.
b. The County and the Cities shall address compatibility between land use and transportation
facilities by:
i. Not using new road improvements to justify land use intensification.
ii. Managing access on new transportation facilities outside Urban Growth Areas.
iii. Allowing phased development of improvements including acquiring right of way.
iv. Using comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure that development
does not create demands exceeding the capacity of the transportation system, such as:
density limits in areas outside of Urban Growth Areas; concurrency management and
adequate public facility regulation; integrated multi -modal and non - motorized
networks.
c. The County and the Cities shall work together in a coordinated, iterative process to
periodically reassess whether regional land use and transportation goals can realistically be
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
29 49 2007
met. If transportation adequacy and concurrency cannot be met, the following actions
should be considered:
Adjust land use and /or level of service (LOS) standards and consider adoptiLg multi -
modal solutions.
ii. Make full use of all feasible local option transportation revenues authorized but not yet
implemented.
iii. Work with Washington State Department of Transportation (including Washington
State Ferries), Kitsap Transit, and the private sector to seek additional State
transportation revenues, state and federal grants for infrastructure improvements, and
local options to make system improvements necessary to accommodate projected
population growth.
d. Adjacent jurisdictions in Kitsap County shall develop consistent street classification system
and street standards.
e. Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council may establish a process for evaluating development
impacts including those that may affect neighboring jurisdictions within the county.
f. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall function to ensure that transportation
planning, system management and improvements at local, regional, and state levels are
coordinated, complementary, and consistent with adopted comprehensive land use plans.
10. Coordinated and consistent level of service (LOS)standards:
a. The County and the Cities should develop comparable level of service standards among the
County, Cities and the State of Washington for identified regional system components.
b. The County and the Cities shall adopt roadway LOS standards. Urban growth management
agreements shall designate level of service standards.
c. The County and the Cities shall adopt transit LOS in the form of "Service Standards"
adopted by the Kitsap Transit Board of Commissioners. The standards shall consider both
frequency of service and bus capacity.
d. Consistent with State law, the County and Cities shall recognize the Level of Service
Standards for Highways of Statewide Significance, including principal arterial ferry routes,
that have been adopted by the Washington State Department of
Transportation, in their respective Comprehensive Plans.
e. For State highways and facilities of regional significance, including the Southworth ferry
route, the County and the Cities shall include the Level of Service Standards adopted for
these routes by the Puget Sound Regional Council, the Peninsula RTPO, and the
Washington State Department of Transportation, in their respective Comprehensive Plans.
f. On highways and streets which are subject to concurrency requirements, the County and
the Cities shall each identify capacity deficiencies and either address them in terms of
identified funding, adjust the LOS standard on a temporary basis, or place a temporary
moratorium on development.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
30 49 2007
g. On highways and streets which are subject to concurrency requirements, new development
should not cause LOS to degrade to a level lower than the adopted standard, consistent with
State law.
31
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
49 2007
Element L AMrdable Housing
The Growth Management Act requires cities and counties to encourage the availability of housing
that is affordable for all income levels at a variety of housing densities. Local jurisdictions are also
encouraged to preserve existing housing resources in their communities, and to provide an
adequate supply of housing with ,good access to employment centers to support job creation and
economic ,growth.(WAC 365.196.410)
VISION 2040 takes a comprehensive approach to
addressing the range of housing needs. Housing is
addressed throughout the Countywide Planning Policies.
See box on riKht specific references.
Jobs- Housin,- Balance:
Jobs - housing balance refers to relationship of housing
supply and the job base. There are transportation
implications in terms of improving accessibility between
where jobs are located and where people live, as well as
access to goods, services and other amenities. Policies in
Element C: Centers of Growth, Element F: Contiguous,
Compatible and Orderly Development, and Element J.
CounUwide Economic Development are all part of the
County's overall approach to jobs- housing balance.
Countywide Planninz Policies
Addressinz Jobs- Housinz Balance:
C:21
Centers as areas of a mix o�
C:4
business, commercial and
residential uses
F: 4 -c
Mixed used development
J. -b
Employment or diverse
segments of the community
J. -e
Economic Prosperity and
increased job opportunities
J_2
Promoting development of
designed industrial and
commercial areas
Best Practices in Housing: I JJ_3 Monitoring land sUp
The County and the Cities recognize the value of housing '
practices that preserve existing neighborhoods and communities. use land more efficiently. make
services more economical, and meet the diverse needs of our county's chanphics.
The Community Design and Development Policies in Element F: Contiguous, Compatible and
Orderly Development address kev innovative practices and design principles for development and
housing.
Affordable Housinz:
Housing affordability refers to the balance (or imbalance) between household income and housing
costs. Affordable housing is a major challenge in Kitsap County.
The following definitions relate to the Countywide Planning Policies:
Below Ma -ket Rate Housing shall mean housing intended for a full range of lew to ffi id l
ineeffw—households- These income levels are f 4the defined as follows (
�� (WAC 365.196.410 [2 j- e -i -C�
• Extremely low- income shall mean those households that have incomes that are at or
below 30% of the countywide median.
• Very low- income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the
range of 31 - 50% of the countywide median.
• Low - income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the range
of 51 - 80% of the countywide median.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
32 49 2007
• Moderate - income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the
range 81 -95% of the countywide median.
• Middle - income shall mean those households that have incomes that are within the
range of 96 -120% of the countywide median.
■ Upper- income shall mean those households that have incomes above 120% of the
countywide median.
Policies for Affordable Housing (Aft
1. Coordinated process among County, Cities, and housing agencies for determining and
fulfilling housing needs, and the equitable distribution of below market rate affordable
housing at all income levels in Kitsap County:
a. The County and the Cities should inventory the existing housing stock consistent with the
Growth Management Act synchronized with
County and Cities' respective Comprehensive Plan Updates and correlate with current
population and economic conditions, past trends, and ten year population and employment
forecasts, to determine short and long range housing needs, including rental and home
ownership. Navy personnel housing policy should also be considered.
c- b. Local housing inventories, projections, and equitable distribution strategies should be
compiled, updated, and monitored under the coordination of the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council to identify countywide conditions and projected needs.
c. Sufficient land supply for housing including various housin types shall be identified and
monitored through regular updates to the countywide Buildable Lands Analysis fsee
Element B -1 Land Utilization and Monitoring Programsl.
d. The County and the Cities should each identify specific policies and implementation
strategies in their Comprehensive Plans and should enact implementing regulations to
provide a mix of housing types and costs to achieve identified goals for both market r� *°
and bele w ffiftf4et r� +° housing at all income levels, includin g access to employment
centers
e.
The County and the Cities shall incorporate a regular review of public health, ftffd
safety, and development regulations pertaining to housing implementation strategies to
assure that:
i. protection of the public health and safety remains the primary purpose for housing
standards
ii. regulations are streamlined and flexible to minimize additional costs to housing
2. Recognizing that the market place makes adequate provision for those in the upper
economic brackets, each jurisdiction should r--develop some combination of
appropriately zoned land, regulatory incentives, financial subsidies, and/or innovative
planning techniques to make adequate provisions for the needs of middle and lower
income persons. (MLAG 365.195 070.6)
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
33 49 2007
3.Recognizing the percentage share of the existing and forecasted countywide population and
housin,- stock, as well as aPA- � the distribution of existing bele fnafket rate housing f those
households below 120% countywide median income, the County and the Cities should
develop coordinated strategies to e" itably disperse projected eeffn ywide bole w fnafket fate
housing for those below 120% countywide median income -Bee&throughout geogr^p' ieW
Kitsap County i n the T T,.b rr,, 4 ^ fvas �ra where they are specifically found to be
appropriate in consideration of existing development patterns and densities. i1i designated
RttFal Gemfntt*i es These stratemies should promote the development of below fnaFket rate
such housing in a dispersed pattern so as not to concentrate or geographically isolate low -
income housing in a specific area or community.
-3 4. Provision of below market rate—aff housing for households
below 120% countywide median income should include:
d- a. Below fnafket fate Housing o t ions shottid be located throughout Kitsap County in
Urban Growth Areas and Rural Communities, as defined in Element D (2 -a) in a manner
to provide easy access to transportation, employment, and other services.
i. Designated Centers should include below fnaFke+ fete such housing op tions .
ii. Rural self- help housing programs should be encouraged fi rst in UGA's and Rural
Communities and then allowed in other appropriate areas as defined by the U.S.
Dept. ofAgriculture .
-A Local comprehensive plan policies and development regulations that encourage and
do not exclude bole _, maFke fete such housing.
1} c. Below ma -Fket r ^ *^ Housing strategies shotild that include:
i. preservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of existing neighborhoods as
appropriate, including programs to rehabilitate and /or energy retro s at substandard
housing;
ii. provision for a range of housing types such as multi - family, single family, accessory
dwelling units, cooperative housing, and manufactured housing on individual lots and
in manufactured housing parks;
iii. housing design and siting compatible with surrounding neighborhoods;
iv. mechanisms to help people purchase their own housing, such as low interest loan
programs, "self- help" housing, and consumer education.
v. innovative regulatory strategies shall be developed and implemented *^ that provide
incentives for the development of bole w mafket-� housing
cent^ - " etiens hatch deyelOi wiieh provide a wide r-ang° of
means such as: reducing housing cost by subsidizing utility hook -up fees and rates,
impact fees, and permit processing fees; density incentives; smaller lot sizes; zero lot
line designs; inclusionary zoning techniques, such as requiring be!E) W MaFket fate
housing f specified income level s in new residential developments; transfers of
development rights and /or a priority permit review and approval process and /or other
provisions as appropriate
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
34 49 2007
e- Housing policies and programs shall that address the provision of diverse housing
opportunities to accommodate the homeless, the elderly, physically or mentally
challenged, and other segments of the population that have special needs.
h- e. T he County and the Cities shat P articipate ion with housing authorities to
facilitate the production of below ffla 4et � such housing. The County and the Cities
shall also recognize and support other public and private not - for - profit housing agencies.
Supporting housing agencies is encouraged through public land donations, guarantees,
suitable design standards, tax incentives, fee waivers, providing access to funding
sources and support for funding applications, or other provisions as appropriate.
S. The County and the Cities shall collaborate with PSRC to evaluate availability of appropriate
housin g types to serve future residents and chanin demographics.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
35 49 2007
Element J. Countywide Economic Development
Growth Management Act requires that general economic development policies be identified in the
Countywide Planning Policies. Consistent with the goals of the Act, economic development
planning must be coordinated with local comprehensive plans. The intent of the following policies
is to encourage coordinated economic growth among all jurisdictions in Kitsap County and to add
predictability and certainty to the private investment decision.
Policies for Countywide Economic Development (Eft
1. A general strategy for enhancing economic development and employment:
a. The County and the Cities recognize that a healthy economy that pfevide es fe
diver -^° segments of the s important to the health of residents and quality of
life in the county. Economic development should be balanced with environmental
concerns and protect the quality of life.
b. A healthy economy provides a spectrum oLiobs includin entry- level, livin g wage, and
advanced wage earner employment that, raises family income levels and provides
opportunities for diverse segments of the community.
A- c. The County and the Cities recognize that the economy in Kitsap County is very dependent
on the U.S. Navy and diversification is necessary. Diversification should be promoted
through a multi - faceted strategy that includes broadening the customer bases of existing
contracting industries, expanding the number of local businesses that benefit from defense
contracting, and building the base of business activity that is not directly connected to the
Department o fie ense
b -d.The County and the Cities shall collaborate with ports, tribes, and other special districts to
encourage economic growth and diversification that is consistent with comprehensive plans
and policies for land use, transportation, public transit, regional water supply, capital
facilities, urban governmental services and environmental quality.
c-e. Local governments are encouraged to utilize the Kitsap Economic Development Cetl*eil
Alliance (KEDA) a resource to provide advice on economic development needs, the
potential for retaining and expanding existing industries, including the U.S. Dept. of
Defense, and attracting new industries, especially those that would improve wage and
salary levels, increase the variety of job opportunities, and utilize the resident labor force.
f The County and the Cities should cooperate /participate with the Puget Sound Regional
Council's economic initiatives, including focus on identified industry clusters and clean
industry and with the KEDA's adopted plan, Kitsap 20120: A Strategy for Sustainable
Economic Prosperity.
d.g.The County and the Cities recognize that widespread access to broadband capability will
enhance economic development in Kitsap County. Local governments are encouraged to
collaborate with the KEDA to promote the
expansion of telecommunications in Kitsap County and to coordinate telecommunications
policy with regional and federal agencies, including public utility districts, Bonneville
Power Administration, regional transportation planning organizations, and neighboring
counties.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
36 49 2007
eh. Investments in our people, in particular, e fforts of local educational institutions to provide,
improve and expand vocational and post - secondary education programs be
supported to assure a highly skilled, technically trained resident work force.
2. The role of government agencies in assuring coordinated, consistent efforts to promote
economic vitality and equity throughout Kitsap County:
a. The County and the Cities shall promote Urban Growth Areas and existing industrial sites
as centers for employment.
b. The County and the Cities shall encourage the full utilization /development of designated
industrial and commercial areas. The County and the Cities shall promote revitalization
within existing developed industrial and commercial areas to take advantage of the
significant investments in existing buildings and infrastructure.
c. The County and the Cities shall cooperate with tribes, ports, other special districts, and all
economic development interests to identify the capital facility needs of a„ s i ghted
i f i &str-ial and eemfneFeial sites and i to support economic development and
should identify necessary funding sources
d. The County and the Cities shall collaborate with tribes, ports, and other special districts to
identify innovative development methods such as public and private partnerships and
community development assistance financing to increase economic vitality.
e. The County and the Cities shall collaborate with the E44GKEDA and the Ports to
establish a common method to monitor the supply of designated commercial and
industrial sites and to ensure adequate land supply for the expansion of existing
enterprises and the establishment of new economic enterprises. The monitoring
method shall indicate environmental constraints, infrastructure availability and
capacity, and shall use the Kitsap County Geographic Information System and Land
Capacity Analysis as a regional database for this information.
F The County and the Cities shall establish common infrastructure policy and standards,
including telecommunications infrastructure.
g. The County, Cities and KEDA shall collaborate to identiL opportunities that favor local
suppliers for goods and services.
3. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall coordinate the development of land
supply monitoring methods, common infrastructure policy and standards, and other
strategies among the County, the Cities, Tribes, Ports, and other special districts to
encourage economic development in Kitsap County:
a. The County and the Cities shall each establish and monitor a development review process
that is timely, predictable, efficient, fair, and consistent.
b. Where more than one jurisdiction is involved in planning and permitting a business
development, the jurisdictions shall work collaboratively to provide consistent development
regulations and permitting.
c. The County and the Cities shall encourage small business enterprises and cottage
industries, and allow appropriate and traditional home occupations as permitted by local
regulations.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
37 49 2007
Element K. An Analysis of the Fiscal Impact
In order to preserve and maintain the community's quality of life and level of government services,
jurisdictions are expected to fully evaluate their financial capacity to provide the full range of
urban services (as described in Element B — 3[j]) within designated Urban Growth Areas.
Policies for Analysis of Fiscal Impact (FI):
1. The Countywide Planning Policies recognize three opportunities for jurisdictions to consider
and plan for urban -level infrastructure and services:
a. During each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan amendments, through the Capital Facilities
Plan, including sub -area plans, Urban Growth Area boundary changes, incorporations,
partial dis- incorporations, proposed new fully contained communities and master planned
resorts.
b. At the point where a jurisdiction is comparing and analyzing geographic areas for possible
expansion of its Urban Growth Area (as described in Element B — 3b]).
c. As part of the development of the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (see
Element B -4 [d] and Appendix Q.
These analyses and plans should identify infrastructure and service costs as well as the
anticipated revenues to support them.
2. Special districts should be included in planning for the provision of urban level services in
Urban Growth Areas and should include future population growth in their plans.
3. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall facilitate on -going regional discussion of
infrastructure and service delivery strategies (see Element F -1 [c]) and revenue equity issues
(see Element F -3 [c]).
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
38 49 2007
Element L. Coordination with Tribal Governments
The Suquamish Tribe, the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, and other federally recognized Indian
tribes have reservations and /or trust resources within Kitsap County, Washington. These tribes are
parties to treaties with the United States Government through which certain rights and privileges
both on and off reservation were articulated and remain in effect. These tribes have authorities,
responsibilities, interests and treaty rights within their respective reservation boundaries and Usual
and Accustomed Areas. Since future growth and land use decisions in KitsapCounty affect all
governmental entities, governmental agencies must be well informed and continuously involved in
regional and local planning.
Policies for Coordination with Tribal Governments (CT):
1. Meaningful and substantial opportunities for early and continuous tribal government
participation shall be incorporated into regional and local planning activities.
2. Local jurisdictions should work with the tribes to develop agreements that provide for
discussion on comprehensive planning issues among governments and ensure that the tribes are
consulted on issues within their interest. The parties will jointly determine the appropriate
contents of the agreements and a schedule for completing them.
3. Tribal governments, federal agencies, and county and local governments are encouraged to
coordinate plans among and between governments and agencies to address substantive areas of
mutual interest especially where geographical areas overlay and promote complementary and
cooperative efforts.
4. City and County governments are encouraged to include Tribal governments in joint
comprehensive planning and development activities for areas within the Tribes' Usual and
Accustomed areas. Activities include but are not limited to the establishment and revision of
urban growth boundaries, distribution of forecasted population; regional transportation, capital
facility, housing and utility plans; and policies that may affect natural and /or cultural resources.
5. All County, City, and Tribal government agencies shall be included in the normal public notice
and comment procedures of other agencies and kept informed of matters of interest to them.
6. The County, the Cities, and Tribal governmental agencies are encouraged to keep one another
informed about matters of local and regional interest by mutually agreeable means and
schedule.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
39 49 2007
Element M. Coordination with Federal Government including Navy
The federal government has unique authorities, responsibilities, interests affecting land use
and other activities. Military installations are of particular importance to the economic health
of Washington State, as well as to national security. Since the impacts of future growth and
development in Kitsap County affect all governmental entities, governmental agencies must
be well informed and continuously involved in regional and local planning.
Policies for Coordination with Federal Government (CF):
1. Meaningful and substantial opportunities for early and continuous federal government
participation shall be incorporated into regional and local planning activities.
2. It is recognized that constitutional and statutory provisions may constrain federal
government agencies from entering into local agreements and processes. However, when
possible, the County, the Cities, and federal governments should establish
intergovernmental cooperative agreements promoting coordination and involvement in
activities that are of mutual interest.
3. Federal agencies and county and local governments are encouraged to coordinate plans
among and between governments and agencies to make plans as consistent and
compatible as possible for properties over which they have authority or activities they
authorize and the adjacent areas affected.
4. Federal government agencies are encouraged to participate in City, County, and joint
comprehensive planning and development activities that may affect them, including the
establishment and revision of urban growth areas encompassing, adjacent to or within
federally -owned lands; distribution of forecasted population; regional transportation,
capital facility, housing and utility plans; and policies that may affect natural and /or
cultural resources of interest.
5. The following policies relate to promoting coordination among the Cities, County, and the
federal government including the Navy:
a. All jurisdictions should promote planning that considers the impact of new growth to
avoid the potential for encroachment on military readiness activities as described
below when developing zoning ordinances or designating land uses affecting military
facilities. Each jurisdiction and the Navy should coordinate to identify the types of
development and areas of interest to the Navy, method of notice, and opportunities for
comment.
b. "Military readiness activities" mean all of the following:
i. Training, support, and operations that prepare the men and women of the
military and Naval ships and submarines for combat.
ii. Operation, maintenance, and security of any military installation.
iii. Testing of military equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper
operation or suitability for combat use.
c. "Impacts" include but are not limited to:
i. Aircraft, boat, and rail traffic.
ii. Incompatible adjacent land uses.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
40 49 2007
d. Through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, jurisdictions should monitor
issues that arise in implementing these policies, and should identify areas for
improved coordination.
6. All County, City, and federal governmental agencies shall be included in the normal
public notice and comment procedures of other agencies and kept informed of matters of
interest to them (RCW 36.70A.530)
7. The County, the Cities, and federal governmental agencies are encouraged to keep one
another informed of matters of local and regional interest by mutually agreeable means
and schedule.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
41 49 2007
Element N. Roles and Responsibilities
The County, Cities, Tribal governments, and special districts are all involved in planning activities
related to their statutory authority and responsibility. In addition to the responsibilities defined in
previous countywide planning policies, this section further clarifies the planning roles and
responsibilities of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council and member agencies.
Policies for Roles and Responsibilities (RR):
1. The KITSAP REGIONAL COORDINATING COUNCIL was established by interlocal
agreement (see Appendix E) to assure coordination, consensus, consistency, and
compliance in the implementation of the Growth Management Act and comprehensive
planning by County, city and tribal governments within Kitsap County. The Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council also provides a voice for all jurisdictions and opportunity
for citizens and stakeholders to provide input to planning policies to be applied
countywide. The interlocal agreement adopted by the County, the Cities and the Tribal
governments declared that the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council is necessary to
maintain a regular intergovernmental communication network for all local and tribal
governments within the county, facilitate compliance with the coordination and
consistency requirements of the Growth Management Act, provide an effective vehicle to
resolve conflict among and /or between jurisdictions with respect to urban growth
boundaries or comprehensive plan consistency, and to build consensus on planning
solutions for countywide growth management issues. The Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council shall:
a. Submit agreed -upon recommendations on behalf of member jurisdictions to multi - county
regional agencies and State government on proposed changes to multi - county regional
plans, State plans, and laws.
b. Provide a forum, as necessary, for achieving coordination in the development of local plans
and resolving planning and plan implementation issues that are common among
jurisdictions.
c. Promote coordination and consistency among local plans and between local plans and the
Countywide Planning Policies and the Growth Management Act to the extent necessary to
achieve regional policies and objectives. Through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council forum, jurisdictions should establish a process to monitor and review individual
comprehensive plans and associated implementation mechanisms to determine consistency
with the Countywide Planning Policies.
d. Serve as a forum for resolving disputes locally. The process shall not preclude appeals to
the Central Puget Sound Growth Planning Hearings Board if the local process has been
exhausted without resolution of the dispute.
e. Promote coordination of educational programs and the dissemination of planning - related
information of regional interest.
f. Coordinate the review, revision and monitoring of the Countywide Planning Policies.
g. Apply for grants and administer contracts relative to regional tasks and plans.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
42 49 2007
h. Conduct the region -wide growth management planning consistent with these policies.
i. Initiate and coordinate the development of other regional planning policies and
implementation mechanisms that may improve the effectiveness ofthe comprehensive
planning process.
j. Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous public
involvement in policy discussions facilitated by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council.
2. KITSAP COUNTY is the regional government within the county boundaries providing
various services within unincorporated and incorporated areas as required and specified
by law and by legal agreements. Kitsap County shall:
a. Be responsible for the development, adoption and implementation of comprehensive plans
and development regulations and the processing of land use permits for the unincorporated
portions of the county.
b. Be responsible for coordinating water quality planning in multi jurisdictional watersheds
and for other environmental planning activities as agreed to by all affected and interested
jurisdictions.
c. Be responsible for coordinating the response on the listing for the federal Endangered
Species Act in multi jurisdictional watersheds as agreed by all affected and interested
jurisdictions.
d. Be responsible for being a regional sewer provider to the unincorporated areas of Kitsap
County as needed to improve water quality consistent with levels of service outlined in the
County Comprehensive Plan.
e. Maintain a geographic information system to serve as a regional planning data base.
f. Execute Urban Growth Area Management Agreements with each city to address joint
issues identified in the Countywide Planning Policies and other matters agreed to be of
mutual interest.
g. Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous public
involvement throughout short and long range planning projects.
3. CITIES within Kitsap County provide a variety of services primarily to residents within
their respective municipal boundaries. Cities shall:
a. Provide urban governmental services as identified in the Growth Management Act (Chapter
36.70A RCW) and adopted urban growth management agreements.
b. Be responsible for the development, adoption and implementation of comprehensive plans
and development regulations and the processing of land use permits within the incorporated
portion of the respective city.
c. Participate with other agencies in multi jurisdictional planning activities including but not
limited to environmental planning, e.g. water quality planning and coordinating the
response on the listing for the Federal Endangered Species Act in multi jurisdictional
watersheds transportation planning, and growth management strategies.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
43 49 2007
d. Execute a separate Urban Growth Area Management Agreement with Kitsap County to
address joint issues identified in the Countywide Planning Policies and other matters agreed
to be of mutual interest.
e. Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous public
involvement throughout short and long range planning projects.
4. SPECIAL DISTRICTS are governmental subdivisions of the county that are usually
established to provide a defined scope of services. Special districts shall:
a. Be responsible for service provision, capital facility planning and other activities as
authorized by law and legal agreements.
b. Coordinate capital planning and implementation strategies with local governments to assure
consistency with comprehensive plan policies, the Countywide Planning Policies, and the
WA State Growth Management Act;
c. Participate in service provision identification required in each urban growth management
agreement;
d. Coordinate with other agencies as appropriate in multi jurisdictional planning activities;
e. Provide technical assistance as appropriate to assist local governments in comprehensive
plan development, adoption and implementation;
f. Be-e- Encourage d to entef i cooperative agreements and consolidate when possible to
formalize participation in local and regional processes;
g. Define and implement procedures that assure opportunities for early and continuous public
involvement throughout short and long range planning projects.
h. Site and size facilities consistent with local Plans.
5. The County and Cities shall coordinate with the County Department ofEmemency
Mana ,-ement to ensure system integrity and coordinated response in the event of disasters
and other emergencies.
6. The County and Cities shall coordinate with the County Department ofEmemency
Manazement to ensure the integrity of the National Incident Manazement system and
coordinated response in the event of disasters and other emergencies.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
44 49 2007
Appendix A:
Kitsap Countywide Planning Policy Ratification Process
a
r -------------- - - - - -�
Draft Revisions through 1 County, City, & Tribal Councils review i
possible revisions to the CPP's
Planning Directors - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - -
,
The Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council Board
Adopt and Recommend CPPs
• Discuss CPP's
• Release draft for Public Comme Estimated
• Public Hearing 3 Months
Kitsap County • Discuss CPP's
Adoption by Ordinance • Recommend to County, Cities, &
• SEPA Review Tribes
• Kitsap County Public Hearing
• Kitsap County Ordinance City & Tribal Councils Ratify
(may change document) • Resolution to Ratify (Within
Estimated 90 days of County Ordinance)
2 Months ■ Yes Up to
■ No 3 Months
• No Resolution: abstention C
County Ordinance Takes Effect
Begin 60 day City /State
Appeal Period to GMHB
60 days
3+ Cities Ratify
If 2+ Cities don't
Ratify or Abstain:
to KRCC for
further discussion
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note that the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council anticipates refinements
to this process over time.
............................................................................................................................................ ...........................�ded to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
a„rf d t its .r nns 2007
4 X007
Appendix B: Population Distribution 2005 - 2025
Population Distribution
2005 through 2025
2000
Population
Through 2025
+ New
Population
=Total
in 2025
Annual
Growth Rate
Bremerton City 2
37,259
14,759
52,017
1.34%
East UGA 1
5,412
2,210
7,622
1.38%
West UGA 1
3,229
2,017
5,246
1.96%
Bremerton Port UGA
68
-68
0
- 100.00%
Central Kitsa UGA 1
21,743
8,733
30,476
1.36%
Gorst UGA
154
73
227
1.56%
Silverdale UGA 1
15,276
8,059
23,335
1.71%
Bainbridge Island City 2
20,308
8,352
28,660
1.39%
Kingston UGA
1,871
3,135
5,006
4.02%
Poulsbo City 2
6,813
3,739
10,552
1.77%
UGA 2
901
3,355
4,256
6.41%
Port Orchard City 2
7,693
3,600
11,293
1.55%
UGA
11,570
3,375
14,945
1.03%
Port Orchard UGA Expansion
Stud Area
0
6 334
6,334
'
South Kitsap UGA:
1,241
8,024
9,265
8.37%
UGA Population
133,537 58%
75,697 76%
209,234
1.81%
Non -UGA Population
98,432 42%
23,905 24%
122,33737%
0.87%
Total County Population
231,969
99,602
331,571
1.44%
OFM Projection through 2025
Low
268,573
0.59%
Intermediate
331,571
1.44%
High
412,391
2.33%
1 Based on PSRC Model
2 Based on City and /or County
Comprehensive or Sub -area
planning
3 Target to be substantiated by
further analysis and /or Sub -area
planning
4 Office of Financial
Management official estimate
Kitsap County
Historical
Growth
US
Census
Annual
Growth Rate
1960
84,176
1970
101,732
1.91%
1980
147,152
3.76%
1990
189,731
2.57%
2000
231,969
2.03%
2004
239,500
0.80%
Note: Population Banking as described in
Kitsap County's Updated Comprehensive
Plan LU -13 applies to the potential need
in specific UGA's (e.g. Central Kitsap) to
work with adjacent Cities to resolve unmet
population growth targets through an
UGAMA or to re- allocate population to
other UGA's over time, through the
Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
Population distribution will be reviewed through the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council process every five years. The review will
include an analysis of the Cities' and County's progress in achieving
target distributions. If the 76% UGA target mentioned above for new
population growth and the overall population targets are met or
exceeded, the target for new population will revert to five sixths
(83 %), as per the revised County -wide Planning Policies adopted by
Kitsap County Ordinance #258 -01 on August 20, 2001. Otherwise,
the target may be reaffirmed or explicitly modified. 1 , 2011
c
Appendix C: Urban Growth Area Management Agreements
The intent of the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement is to facilitate and encourage
annexation and /or incorporation of urban areas over the 20 year planning period and to ensure
compatibility of development within the unincorporated Urban Growth Area. Each Urban Growth
Area Management Agreement shall:
1. Describe the goals and procedures of the joint planning process including roles and responsibilities for
the unincorporated Urban Growth Area, with the goal of having compatible City and County plans,
zoning, and development regulations. The following provisions should apply to the entire Urban Growth
Area associated with the City unless mutually agreed otherwise by the City and County:
a. The City's zoning code, densities, and development, sub - division, environmental, and construction
standards.
b. The City's Levels of Service.
c. The Comprehensive Plan of the City should reflect land use planning for the entire Urban Growth
Area.
2. Identify responsibility and mechanisms for comprehensive plan amendments, zoning changes and
development applications within unincorporated Urban Growth Areas. Significant weight should be
given to City preferences.
3. Identify services to be provided in the Urban Growth Area, the responsible service purveyors, and the
terms under which the services shall be provided, including:
Fire Storm Water Solid Waste
Police Potable Water Park & Recreation Facilities
Transportation Sewer Schools
Utilities: Power and Telecommunications, including broadband where available
EMS
All service providers, including special districts, and adjacent jurisdictions should be included in Urban
Growth Area planning.
4. Reference the adopted Revenue Sharing Inter -local Agreement, as appropriate (see Appendix D).
5. Develop pre- annexation plans, which shall include:
a. Conditioning City service extensions upon actual annexation for properties contiguous to the City
boundary or to agreements of no protest to future annexation for properties not contiguous.
b. Offering pre- annexation agreements to property owners interested in annexation and needing
assurances from the City about services, planning, or other issues.
c. Plans for tiering and /or phasing of infrastructure development, appropriate to the individual Urban
Growth Area.
d. City priorities for City -led annexation efforts as appropriate.
6. Describe the development and implementation of a public involvement program that identifies roles and
responsibilities for respective jurisdictions, including actions and timeline.
7. Be reflected in County and City Comprehensive plans.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
n 4"d t,, T4t sap C-eu n t , 0 P ,44 naigee 4 ns 2 -0-07
Appendix D
Interlocal Agreement Between Kitsap County and the City of Bainbridge Island,
City of Bremerton, City of Port Orchard and City of Poulsbo Concerning Revenue
Sharing Upon Annexation and In Conjunction With Major Land Use Decisions
Within a City's Urban Growth Area
Adopted by all parties in November- December, 2001.
Effective November 24, 2010, the City of Port Orchard is o� icially withdrawn rom this agreement.
Effective November 29, 2011, the City of Bremerton is officially withdrawn from this agreement.
This Agreement, made pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, is between KITSAP COUNTY (hereinafter, the
County), a political subdivision of the State of Washington, and the CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND,
the CITY OF BREMERTON, the CITY OF PORT ORCHARD, and the CITY OF POULSBO,
(hereinafter, the Cities), municipal subdivisions of the State of Washington.
WHEREAS, through the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, the County and the Cities have worked
together constructively on revenue sharing issues that in the past have been adversarial; and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities sought a balanced set of revenue sharing provisions that would
benefit both the County and the Cities and support the orderly evolution of logical land use patterns and
jurisdictional boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities reached accord on a set of Principles of Agreement for Revenue
Sharing in Annexations and in Major Land Use Decisions; and
WHEREAS, the County and Cities desire to implement the Principles of Agreement through an interlocal
agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions contained herein,
the parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1 ANNEXATIONS
The purpose of this section is to provide a framework for logical and orderly annexations that are
consistent with the Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW (hereinafter GMA), and to mitigate
the fiscal impact to the County of annexations initiated after the effective date of this agreement.
1.1 The Cities each confirm their willingness to eventually annex all land within their designated
Urban Growth Area (hereinafter UGA) boundaries.
1.2 Each City shall encourage annexation of all lands equally, and will support logical and
coordinated annexations, consistent with the intent of the GMA.
1.3 As part of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council's 2002 Work Program, the County and
Cities will continue to address coordinated development within the UGAs, including
infrastructure standards and funding.
1.4 Before the County constructs a major infrastructure improvement within a City's designated
UGA, the County and the City will negotiate and execute an interlocal agreement that
specifies the level at which the City shall reimburse the County for a portion of its investment
in the infrastructure improvement if the area where the improvement is to be located is
annexed within a specified period of time.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
n 4"d t,, T4t C-eu n t , 0 P ,44 naigee nns 2 - 0 - 0 7
49 2007
d
1.5 The County and the Cities anticipate that each specific proposed annexation will require
negotiation of other issues particular to its time, place and geography. The Cities and the
County commit to completing these negotiations and executing an interlocal agreement on
such issues in a timely manner.
1.6 As part of this agreement, the County will not oppose annexations within that City's
designated UGA or invite the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction.
1.7 The Cities agree to share with the County revenue lost to the County and gained by the
annexing City as follows:
A. Revenue sharing payments shall be based on the following three sources of
revenue:
1. The County's portion of the local retail sales tax levied under Chapter
82.14 RCW.
2. The ad valorem property tax levied by the County pursuant to RCW
36.82.040 for establishment and maintenance of county transportation
systems.
The admission tax levied by the County pursuant to Chapter 36.38
RCW.
B. For purposes of this Section, "lost revenue" means an amount computed as follows:
The combined total of the County's collections from all three sources
within the annexation area during the calendar year preceding annexation
minus
The combined total of the County's collections from all three sources
within the annexation area during the first full calendar year following
annexation.
C. The amount of the payment from the City to the County will be based on a three -year "soft
landing" approach as follows:
1. The Year 1 payment will be equal to 75% of the County's lost revenue.
2. The Year 2 payment will be equal to 50% of the County's lost revenue.
3. The Year 3 payment will be equal to 25% of the County's lost revenue.
D. The calculation of lost revenue pursuant to subsection B of this Section requires revenue
data for one full year following annexation. Therefore, the County shall initiate a request
for payment under this Section by written notice to the annexing City within two years of
the effective date of the annexation.
SECTION 2 MAJOR LAND USE ACTIONS
The purpose of this section is to recognize that retail development near jurisdictional boundaries has
an impact on neighboring jurisdictions and, in particular, on existing businesses and the demand for
public services and facilities. This Section is designed to mitigate these impacts by providing that sales
tax revenues from new major business development within a City's designated UGA, or from the
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
n 4"d by T4t sap C-eu n t , 0 P ,44 naigee nns 2 - 0 - 0 7
rr,,,.,, 4 n 2 007
d
relocation of an existing major business from a City to a location within the City's designated UGA, will
be shared with the affected City.
2.1 For purposes of this Agreement, "major land use" means:
A. A new development within a City's designated UGA that houses any single retail tenant
greater than 40,000 square feet.
B. The expansion of an existing retail business within the City's designated UGA if the
expansion is greater than 40,000 square feet.
C. A retail business greater than 25,000 square feet that is relocated from a City to the City's
designated UGA. Or
D. An automobile, truck, recreational vehicle, manufactured or mobile home, or boat
dealership, regardless of the size of the building permitted, that is newly located within a
City's designated UGA, or relocated from a City to the City's designated UGA.
2.2 The County agrees to share with the affected City revenue lost to the City and gained by the
County due to a major land use, as follows:
A. Revenue sharing payments will be required only for local retail sales tax revenues
generated from major land uses. Because there are limitations, related to confidentiality,
on using a figure based on actual sales tax collections from the new or relocated business,
the revenue sharing payment will be based on estimated sales tax revenues derived by
using industry standards, such as the Washington State Department of Revenue or the
Urban Land Institute, for taxable retail sales per square foot for businesses.
B. For purposes of this Section, "lost revenue" means an amount computed as follows:
Total gross enclosed building square footage of the major land use
x
Industry standard annual average retail sales per square foot for category of business that most closely
resembles the major land use
x
Tax rate levied under Chapter 82.14 RCW
for the first full calendar year following the date on which the County issues a certificate of occupancy
for the major land use.
C. The County will make revenue sharing payments for the first full three years after the
major land use receives a certificate of occupancy.
D. The revenue sharing payment from the County to the affected City will be calculated
according to the following formulas:
For the relocation of a major retail business from a City to the City's designated
UGA:
The Year 1 payment will be equal to 75% of the City's lost revenue;
b. The Year 2 payment will be equal to 50% of the City's lost revenue; and
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
n 4"d by T4t sap C-eu n t , 0 P ,44 naigee nns 2 - 0 - 0 7
49 2007
d
The Year 3 payment will be equal to 25% of the City's lost revenue.
2. For new development within a City's designated UGA that houses any single retail
tenant greater than 40,000 square feet, the payment amount will be 50% of the
City's estimated lost revenue each year for the first three years.
F. The calculation of lost revenue pursuant to subsection B of this Section requires revenue
data for one full year following issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Therefore, the
affected City shall initiate a request for payment under this Section by written notice to the
County within two years of the date the major land use receives the County's permission to
occupy the building.
SECTION 3 MISCELLANEOUS
3.1 Duration. This Agreement will remain in effect until the terms of the Agreement are
fulfilled. There is no other term agreed to by the parties
3.2 Reevaluation. Any City or the County may request immediate reevaluation of this
Agreement by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council Revenue Sharing Policy Committee.
If the reevaluation fails to yield a resolution satisfactory to the requesting party within six
months from the date the request for reevaluation was made, the requesting party may initiate
the process for termination provided in this Agreement.
3.3 Termination. After completion of the Reevaluation process required by this Agreement, a
party may terminate this Agreement by 12 months' written notice to the other parties.
Termination does not extinguish the obligations of the terminating party under this Agreement
for annexations initiated, or major land uses for which an application is filed, prior to the
effective date of termination.
3.4 Filing. When fully executed, this Agreement shall be filed with the Kitsap County Auditor.
3.5 Notices. Any notices required by this Agreement shall be delivered, or mailed postage
prepaid, and addressed to:
Kitsap County City of Bainbridge Island City of Bremerton
Clerk to the Board City Clerk City Clerk
Office of the Kitsap County City of Bainbridge Island City of Bremerton
Board of Commissioners 280 Madison Avenue N. 345 6 Street, Suite 600
614 Division Street Bainbridge Island, WA98110 Bremerton, WA98337
Mail stop 4
Port Orchard, WA98366
Citv of Port Orchard
City Clerk
City of Port Orchard
216 Prospect Street
Port Orchard, WA98366
City of Poulsbo Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
Mayor Chair
City of Poulsbo Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council
19050 jefisen Way P.O. Box 1934
P.O. 98 Kingston, WA98346
200 NE Moe Street
d
Poulsbo, WA98370
3.6 Administration. As this Agreement contemplates no joint or cooperative undertaking, each
party shall administer the Agreement as to its own responsibilities under the Agreement. The
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
n 4"d by T4t sap C-eu n t , 0 P ,44 nanee nns 2 - 0 - 0 7
Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council shall oversee the revenue sharing process provided for
in this Agreement.
d
3.7 Reporting. The County and the Cities shall report to the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council at the start of each calendar year any payments made or received by the reporting
jurisdiction pursuant to this Agreement during the preceding calendar year.
3.8 Waiver. The failure by the County or any City to enforce any term or condition of this
Agreement shall not be construed to constitute a waiver of any other term or condition, or of
any subsequent breach of any provision, of this Agreement.
3.9 Entire Agreement. This Agreement includes the entire agreement of the parties with respect
to any matter addressed in this Agreement
3.10 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only upon the written agreement of the
parties made with the same formalities as those required for its original execution.
3.11. Countywide Planning Policy. To the extent that anything in this Agreement may be found to
be inconsistent with any part of the Kitsap County -wide Planning Policy, the County and City
in 2002 will review the applicable parts of the County -wide Planning Policy and revise them
in accordance with this Agreement.
3.12 Review. The County and the Cities shall review this Agreement within the Kitsap Regional
Coordinating Council in December of 2003, and every five years thereafter.
3.13 Effective Date. This Agreement shall take effect retroactively to September 4, 2001, as this
date has been expressly agreed upon by all the parties.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
n 4"d by T4t sap C-eu n t , 0 P ,44 naigee nns 2 - 0 - 0 7
rr,,,.,,,.„6,,,, 4 n 2 007
Appendix E: Interlocal Agreement Establishing the Adopted by Kitsap County
Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council and all four cities
3/21 - 6/20/01
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the undersigned members of the Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council, pursuant to provisions of the Inter -local Cooperation Act of 1967, Chapter
39.34 RCW.
WHEREAS, the undersigned members recognize the need and desirability to participate in a forum for
intergovernmental coordination, cooperation, and consultation among member agencies in order to bring
about a continuous and comprehensive regional planning process and efficient service delivery; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned members desire jointly to undertake continuous cooperative regional
development, land use, housing, capital facility, service, and transportation planning; and
WHEREAS, it is the belief of the undersigned members that regional deliberations, planning, and review
should be accomplished whenever possible by all jurisdictions affected and should receive policy direction
from all local general purpose and tribal governments;
THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and covenants herein it is hereby agreed:
1. DEFINITIONS: For the purpose of this Inter -local Agreement and all other agreements, contracts, and
documents executed, adopted, or approved pursuant to this agreement, the following terms have the
meaning prescribed to them in this section unless the context of their use dictates otherwise:
a. "Member agency" means any public body which is a party or becomes a party to this inter -local
agreement and is a County, City, or federally- recognized Tribal government within the region;
b. "State" means the State of Washington;
c. "Region" means the territory physically lying within the boundaries of Kitsap County;
d. "Council' means the body of local and tribal elected officials designated in accord with the By -laws
of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council to represent member agencies to carry out all delegated
powers and managerial and administrative responsibilities of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating
Council;
e. "Majority vote" means more than one -half of the votes cast when a quorum is present and must
include a majority of votes from County representatives and a majority of votes from the
representatives of at least two separate cities.
2. ORGANIZATION — COMPOSITION AND NATURE: The undersigned member agencies constitute the
Council: Kitsap County, City of Bainbridge Island, City of Bremerton, City of Port Orchard, City of
Poulsbo, the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe and the Suquamish Tribe. Management of the Council is
structured as provided herein and by the Council Bylaws.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
n 4"d t,, T4t sap C-eu n t , 0 P ,44 naigee 4 ns 2 nn7
3. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSES: The Council has the following authorities and purposes:
a. To provide a regional forum for deliberations and cooperative decision - making by the region's elected
officials in order to bring about a continuous and comprehensive planning process.
b. To foster cooperation and mediate differences among governments throughout the region.
c. To coordinate actions to provide for a sustainable economy and environment for the region.
d. To carry out such other planning and coordinating activities authorized by majority vote of the
Council including participation in other forums and organizations.
e. To provide for administrative services necessary and incidental to the aforementioned Council
activities.
4. FINANCING: The Council receives funds from each member agency as provided by the Bylaws and from
other available funding sources. The Council may apply for funding of any nature as may become
available to assist the Council in carrying out its purposes and functions.
5. FISCAL, YEAR AND BUDGET: The fiscal year coincides with the calendar year. The Council adopts an
annual work program and budget in advance of each fiscal year that identifies anticipated activities,
goals, revenues, and expenditures for completing the work program. A draft work program and budget is
prepared by the Executive Committee established by the By -laws of the Council and is submitted for
consideration and approval by the full Council. After the Council has approved the final budget it is
forwarded to the County for inclusion as a distinct agency fund within the Kitsap County Budget. No
increase or decrease to the final budget shall occur without the approval of the Council.
6. WITHDRAWAL. FROM AGREEMENT: Any member agency has the right to withdraw from this Inter -local
Agreement by giving the Council six (6) months prior written notice. Unless otherwise provided by
future agreement, any member agency that withdraws shall remain responsible for its financial and other
obligations with regard to Council activities until the effective date of withdrawal and with regard to
agreements to which the Council is a party and which exist at the time of such notice of withdrawal.
Withdrawal by one member agency to this Inter -local Agreement shall not terminate the agreement as to
any other remaining member agencies.
7. DISPOSAL, OF ASSETS: Upon termination of this agreement any Council assets, after payment of all
liabilities, costs, expenses, and charges validly incurred under this agreement, shall be distributed to all
contributing member agencies in proportion to their contribution determined at the time of termination.
The debts, liabilities, and obligations of the Council shall not constitute a debt, liability, or obligation of
any member agency.
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
n 4"d by T4t sap C-eu n t , 0 P ,44 naigee nns 2 - 0 - 0 7
49 2007
Appendix F: Regional and Kitsap Designated Centers List
(:Adopted 2004
Regional
(Adopted by PSRQ
City of Bremerton
Metro Center
Silverdale Urban Core
Urban Center
South Kitsap Industrial Are
I ndustrial/Employment Center
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction's (Comp Plan Designation
KRCC Center Designation
Kitsap County
Kin ston
Town or City Center/Transportation Hub
Kitsap, County
Southworth
Transportation Hub
Kitsap County
Suquaimish
Activity/Employment Center— Transportation Hub
City of Bremerton
Harrison Employment Center
Activity/Employment Center
City of Bremerton
NW Corporate Campus Employment Center
Activity/Employment Center
City of Bremerton
Port Blakely Employment Center
Activity/Employment Center
City of Bremerton
Upper Wheaton District Center
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton
Lower Wheaton District Center
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton
Sylvan/Pine Neighborhood Center
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton
Perry Avenue Neighborhood Center
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton
Manette Neighborhood Center
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
Cit of Bremerton
Charleston Neighborhood Center
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bremerton
Haddon Neighborhood Center
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bainbridge Island
Winslow Core
Town or City Center
City of Bainbridge Island
Day Road Light Manufacturing Area
Activity/Employment Center
City of Bainbridge Island
Lynnwood - Neighborhood Service Centers*
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bainbridge Island
Rollin Bay - Neighborhood Service Centers*
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Bainbridge Island
Island Center - Neighborhood Service Centers*
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Poulsbo
Poulsbo Town Center
Town or City Center
City of Poulsbo
Olhava
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
City of Port Orchard
City of Port Orchard
Town or City Center/ Transportation Hub
City of Port Orchard
Tremont Community Services
Activity/Employment Center
City of Port Orchard
South Kitsap, Mall — Mixed Use Center
Mixed Use Center/ Neighborhood
Kitsap Transit
Historic Mosquito Fleet Terminals
Transportation Hub
*- Special Planning Areas
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
4 X007
Appendix G:
Centers &Local Areas of More Intensive Rural Development (LAMIRD) Matrix
* Non- motorized/Enhancement Transportation Funding can be used anywhere in Kitsap County.
** 10% each funding cycle, set by federal statute (1991).
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
A,a„rf d t its C- o' O Nee nns 2007
4-9 X007
Mixed Use: High
Federal Funding Cycles
Type of Growth
UGA Criteria Apply
Density
PSRC- managed Transportation
(per GMA)
Residential with
Funding: Centers & Corridors
Jobs
Incorporated UGA
Urban
Yes
Yes
N/A
Unincorporated UGA
Urban
Yes
Yes
N/A
PSRC Centers:
Regional
• Regional
Urban
Yes
Yes
Competitive
• Industrial/Employment
Countywide
Kitsap
Regional Coordinating Council Centers
Countywide
Town/City Center
Urban
Yes
Yes
Mixed Use/Neighborhood
Urban
Yes
Yes
Employment /Activity
Urban if in UGA; Rural if outside UGA
Limited if not in
UGA
Transportation Hubs
Urban if in UGA; Rural if outside UGA
Fully Contained Communities
Urban
Yes
Yes
Countywide if designated as
Kitsap Center
Master Planned Resorts
Recreational
No
Limited
Rural set -aside **
Limited to
In -fill
Existing density
LAMIRDs
Consistent with
No
with
Rural set -aside **
Existing Character
no intensification
of use
Industrial in Rural
Employment/Activity
No
No
Rural set -aside **
Resource -based Industrial
Rural
Non -urban
No
No
Rural set -aside **
Rural Character
Resource Lands
No Residential Growth
Limited
No
Rural set -aside **
* Non- motorized/Enhancement Transportation Funding can be used anywhere in Kitsap County.
** 10% each funding cycle, set by federal statute (1991).
Recommended to Kitsap County by KRCC Board, May 24, 2011
A,a„rf d t its C- o' O Nee nns 2007
4-9 X007