The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01/05/2011 AGENDA i i � � I � S� � I � � i ' � �� 1�1 . . � _1 CITY COUNCIL 345 6+� Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337 ❑ Phone (360) 473-5280 ***AMENDED*** JANUARY 5, 2011 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 1 BRIEFING 5 00 — 5 30 P M m COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603 A General Council Busmess 2 CALL TO ORDER 5 30 P M in FIRST FLOOR CHAMBERS A Pledge of Allegiance B Invocation 3 ELECTION OF 2011 COUNCIL OFFICERS 4 MAYOR'S REPORT 5 PUBLIC RECOGNITION � ANNOUNCEMENTS 6 CONSENT AGENDA A Claims & Check Register 7 GENERAL BUSINESS A Resolution No 3131 honoring and supporting the USS Bremerton and its crew B Resolution No 3132 supporting an application to the Washington State Department of Corrections for the siting of a Westside Reception Center , 8 COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 9 ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING 10 STUDY SESSION — The Council will reconvene in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603 for a briefing by the 2011 Council President, and to discuss "General Council Business" , � Amencans with D�sabd�t�es Act (ADA) accommoda6ons prov�ded upon request Those requ�nng special accommodat�ons should contact the C�ty Clerk s O�ce at (360) 473-5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Councd meehng BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SPEAKERS LIST PLEAS]E PRINT YOUR NAME BELOW IF YOU WISIT YOUR COMMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE RECORD � �,n�a � REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE CLERK THANK YOU � �� JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL P1aESIDENT/MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE G� NAME OF NOMINEE: v' ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: NICK W ORD COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 9 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT/MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE � NAME OF NOMINEE: �� L- L�� C..Jj�/ J�( ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: � ��1 d�� ❑ NAIVIE OF NOMINEE: I�1 C-1� IiC�� Fa K� ❑ NAIV�E OF NOMINEE: � � . � WILL MAUPIloT CO CIL DISTRICT NO. 8 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT/MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE � �^ � � NAME OF NOMINEE: �� ,�� / y � � ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: � ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: �� -�� CAROL ARENDS COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 7 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT/MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: t`"I � �� NAME OF NOMINEE: � 0�� 0(z � ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: � � � � � �° � ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: �� GREG W ELER COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 5 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT/MAYOR PRO—TEMPORE ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: �� s`� NAME OF NOMINEE: ��%�� ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ��'��✓^� 0 NAME OF NOMINEE: R RU ON COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 4 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT/MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE I� NAME OF NOMINEE: i '`�� h +�.v P ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: (�1 U H^�- Q�� S o � ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: N� � �� I�o F� ,. � ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: Gi1.� � _° ADAM BROCKUS COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 3 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT/MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE � � � NAME OF NOMINEE: � � v{�- ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: �� , � CECIL M CONNELL COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 2 � JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL PRESIDENT/MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE � NAME OF NOMINEE: ��pn w ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: /� �'� ' '�" G � ❑ NAME OF N MI EE • �"✓ �� `'` v O N . ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: � v `//� MCDONALD COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 1 ( 'I � JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL VICE-PRESIDENT � NAME OF NOMINEE: �� d�� ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: NICK ORD CO i, DISTRICT NO. 9 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL VICE-PRESIDENT I� NAME OF NOMINEE: ��I� ��C'�C (�S ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: Z C> ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: � , ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: � 1 WILL MAUPIN OUNC ISTRICT NO. 8 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL VICE—PRESIDENT � NAME OF NOMINEE: � ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: �� — ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: G,� �/�-� c � CAROL ARENDS COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 7 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL VICE—PRESIDENT NAME OF NOMINEE: �� cR l� �24C�vS ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: � p v �v dl� `�O M ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: , �.��--_ GRE HEELER COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 5 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL VICE-PRESIDENT ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: �� ' �c�s NAME OF NOMINEE: 1 ��/ � � ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: RO UNY COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 4 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL VICE-PRESIDENT � NAME OF NOMINEE: �� ''d � k� S ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: � G� ADAM BROCKUS COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 3 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL VICE-PRESIDENT � NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: � � CECIL CCONNE L COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 2 JANUARY 5, 2011 BALLOT FOR COUNCIL VICE-PRESIDENT �__---. � NAME OF NOMINEE: �� -� y.� ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: /�' � -�- y� � ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: ❑ NAME OF NOMINEE: G � MCDONALD COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 1 DATE SUBMITTED 1 /5/2011 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ari�raer��ss��v�ao�a�ssa+raroa�a��s��a��aa��r�a��s�oaoaoro�ras��ao�o��vo��aaa�� SUBJECT Committee Meeting Date COUNCIL MEETING Date January 5, 2011 Clatms & Check Register Department Financial Services Presenter Cathy Johnson Phone 473-5296 SUMMARY• Consent Agenda �tem Approval of checks and electronic fund transfers ATTACHMENTS: Check Register FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR MAYOR COMMITTEE CHAIR _ C4UNCIL PRESIDENT // CONSENT AGENDA � � s GENERAL BUSINESS � PUBLIC HEARING RECOMMENDED MOTION: 1) Check #'s 340962 through 341136 and EFT's 10485 through 10519 in the amount of $1,961,054 10 2) Regular Payroll for the pay penod ending December 15, 2010 in the amount of $722,402 95 3) Regular Payroll for the pay penod ending December 31, 2010 in the amount of $743,794 ]4 4) Retiree Payroil for the pay penod ending December 31, 2010 in the amount of $78,413 31 COUNCII. ACTION. � Approve [� Deny � Table �i Continue �]f No Act�on DATE SUBMIT'TED December 28, 2010 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL .......................................................................................� SUBJECT: Resolution 3131 hononng and Committee Meeting Date January 5, 2011 supportmg the ZISS Bremerton and its crew COUNCIL MEETING Date January 5, 2011 Department Mayor's Office Presenter Mayor Patty Lent Phone 473-5266 SUMMARY: The Crty Council desires to honor and support the USS Bremerton and its crew ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CTTY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR MAYOR , COMMITTEE CHAIR � � COUNCIL PRESIDENT CONSENT AGENDA ❑ GENERAL BUSIlVESS PUBLIC HEARING RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve Resoluhon No 3131 hononng and supporhng the USS Bremerton and its crew COUNCIL ACTION• ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Conhnue ❑ No Action RESOLUTION NO 3131 A RESOLUTION of the Crty Council of the Crty of Bremerton, Washmgton, hononng and supporting the IISS Bremerton and rts crew WHEREAS, the USS Bremerton (SSN-698), known by its crew as the Bad Fash, is the second ship of the Uruted States Navy to be named for Bremerton, Washmgton, and WHEREAS, the USS Bremerton was launched on July 22, 1978 sponsored by Mrs Henry M Jackson, and commissioned on March 28, 1981, and WHEREAS, in September 2003, after a successful Western Pacific deployment, the USSBremerton changed its homeport to Pea�{Harbor, Hawaii, and WHEREAS, the USS Bremerton became the oldest commissioned submanne m the US fleet followmg the decommissiorung of the USS Los Angeles (SSN- 688) on January 23, 2010, and WHEREAS, the USS Bremerton has, among other achievements, earned two navy Umt Commendations, a Coast Guard Unit Citation, three Mentounous Umt Commendations, three Battle Efficiency "E"s, Two Navy Expedrtionary Medals and an Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton desires to honor the career of the USS Bremerton and its crew, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS SECTION I Con armataon The Crty Council hereby expresses rts support and gratitude to the USS Bremerton and rts crew for their dedication and outstanding acl�uevements wlule serving with the Umted States Navy SECTION 2 Severabzlatv If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Resoluhon are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remammg portion of tlus Resolution and the same shall remam in full force and effect SECTION 3 E�'ectave Date This Resolution shall take effect and be m force immediately upon rts passage 1 USS Bremerton PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washmgton tlus day of , 2011 NICK WOFFORD, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST ROGER A LUBOVICH, Crty Attorney CAROL ETGEN, Crty Clerk R \Legal\Legal\Resolutions�Legal\USS Bremerton doc 2 USS Bremerton USS Bremerton (SSN-698) - W�pedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 2 USS Bremerton (SSN-698) From Wikipedia, the free encycloped�a USS Bremerton (SSN-698), a Los Angeles-class � � , submanne, was the second slup of the Uruted Sta.tes �� Navy to be named for Bremerton, Waslungton The ,, , i contract to btuld her was awarded to the Electnc i� T � Boat Division of General Dynamics Corporat�on m � Groton, Connecticut on 24 January 1972 and her keel ; ' was la�d down on 8 May 1976 She was launched on �� 22 July 1978 sponsored by Mrs Henry M Jackson, { ' � �_-� "'�- � - �r_ -�' - =�-� = � � ; and commissioned on 28 March 1981 wrth Captasn ; !`'�' - 1 Thomas H Anderson in command � , , On 11 March 1999, Bremerton used one torpedo to � i ; smk the derelict forebody of the merchant slup New G ._ � i Carissa off the Oregon coast The USS David R Ray ; ,� also participated m the smking � , _-; � After a successful Western Pacific deployment, m ' 0. , September 2003 Bremerton changed rts homeport to Career = � Peazl Harbor, Hawaii Bremerton spent two months ' Name USS Bremerton � m drydock at Pearl Harbor endmg 21 January 2010 , Namesake Bremerton, Wash�ngton � Awarded 24 January 1972 � When USS Los Angeles (SSN-688) was i Builder General Dynamics Corporation decommissioned on 23 January 2010, Bremerton La�d down 8 May 1976 became the oldest commissioned submarine in the , Launched 22 July 1978 � US fleet On that day, Richard O'Kane's cnbbage ' Comm�ss�oned 28 March 1981 ' board was transferred from Los Angeles to ' Homeport Pearl Harbor � Bremerton, a tradrtion that dates back to World War Status m act�ve serv�ce, as of 2011 II �3� ' Bad e g � b � { F � e � � ,� � a � r � � o � � t i ' d ia�. A' �,�@ 0 � i General characterist�cs i Class and type Los Angeles class submanne Displacement 5,789 tons l�ght � 6,159 tons full , 370 tons dead ' Length 110 3 m(361 ft 11 m) Beam 10 m(32 ft 10 m) � Draft 97m(31ft10m) ; Propulsion S6G nuclear reactor � Complement 12 officers, 98 men http //en wikipedia org/w/index php?ht1e=USS Bremerton (SSN-698)&pruitable=yes 1/3/2011 USS Bremerton (SSN-698} - Wilcipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 2 of 2 References ; Armament 4 x 21 m(533 mm) torpedo tubes � __ __ _�____�__ _________� _4___ ___ _ ___ � 1^ NEW CARISSA IS FINALLY BURIED AT SEA (http //www seattlepi com/arctuves/1999/9903120070 asp) 2^ Pearl Harbor Slupyard Undocks USS Bremerton (http //www honoluluadvertiser com/article/20100127/GETPUBLISHED/1270388) 3^ Steven Georges (2010-01-23) "USS Los Angeles Decommiss�orung" (http //presstelegram mycapture com/mycapture/enlarge asp� image=27658244&event=930342&CategoryID=28570) Press-Telegram http /lpresstelegram mycapture com/mycapture/enlarge asp� image=27658244&event=930342&CategoryID=28570 Tlus article mcludes uiformation collected from the Naval Vessel Register as well as vanous press releases and news stones Retneved from "http //en wikipedia org/wiki/[JSS Bremerton_(SSN-698)" Categones Ships bi.ult m Connecticut � Los Angeles class submannes � Cold War submannes of the Umted States � Umted States Navy nuclear slups ( Umted States Navy Waslungton (U S state)-related shps � 1978 slvps � Active submannes of the Umted States � Umted States submanne stubs ■ Tlus page was last modified on 9 May 2010 at 14 37 ■ Text is available u.nder the Creahve Commons Attnbuhon-ShazeAhlce License, addrtional terms may apply See Terms of Use for detasls W�pediaC�7 is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc , a non-profit orgaxuzation httn //en wil�nedia ors/w/index nhn`�title=USS Bremerton (SSN-6981&nnntable=ves 1/3/2011 DATE SUBMTTTED January 4, 2011 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL .......................................................................................� SUBJECT: Resolution No 3132 supportmg Committee Meehng Date January 5, 2011 an application to the Waslungton State COLINCIL MEETING Date January 5, 2011 Corrections for the siting of a Westside Department Executtve Reception Center Presenter Mayor Lent Phone 360-473-5266 SUMMARY: Communrties interested m submittmg a site for consideration are reqwred to submrt a letter of interest by January 6, 2011 Crty Council supports submittmg the apphcation for the sitmg of a Westside Recephon Center m SKIA ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No 3132 FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount) None APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR MAYOR . COMMITTEE CHAIIt � �, COUNCIL PRESIDENT CONSENT AGENDA �� GENERAL BUSINESS � PUBLIC HEARING ❑ RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution No 3132 supporting an application to the Washmgton State Corrections for the siting of a Westside Reception Center m SKIA aWtd Qt�c�or��- -1'he. I�a�v r f� t e fih � apP l i c�.�h' A n and al l n2 c,�s sar-cI� s`'`Pf o ��}-cn q doc.c,c.wtie.v� h • •� COUNCIL ACTION: ❑ Approve ❑ Deny ❑ Table ❑ Continue ❑ No Act�on RESOLUTION NO � f 3 Z' A RESOLUTION of the Crty Council of the Crty of Bremerton, Waslungton, supportmg an apphcation to the Waslungton State Department of Corrections for the sitmg of a Westside Reception Center wrthm the Crty of Bremerton WHEREAS the Waslungton State Legislature authonzed the sihng and � construction of the Westside Reception Center m Engrossed Substitute House Bi112836, and WHEREAS the Puget Sound Regional Council and Kitsap Regional Coordinatmg Council have recogruzed the South Krtsap Industnal Center (SKIA) as a Manufactunng / Industnal Center WHEREAS, the Crty of Bremerton has a proud and long lustory supporting and housmg armed services and law enforcement personnel, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. The City of Bremerton is committed to providmg all requested srte mformation to the Waslungton State Department of Corrections by January 21 2011 and fully participate m the ongomg srte selechon process SECTION 2 The City of Bremerton is committed to providing a thorough pubhc outreach process wrth its crtizens dunng the site selechon and permittmg process consistent wrth state law for sitmg essential pubhc facilrties SECTION 3. The Crty of Bremerton commits to provide and/or coordinate wrth other agencies to provide the necessary utilrties and public safety services to the site to meet the Waslungton State Department of Correchon's needs for the Westside Processing Center SECTION 4. Severabalztv If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of tlus Resoluhon are held to be unconstrtuhonal or mvalid, such decision shall not affect the validrty of the remaimng portion of tlus Resoluhon and the same shall remain m full force and effect SECTION S Effectave Date Tlus Resoluhon sha11 take effect and be m force immediately upon rts passage Westszde Receptcon Center PASSED by the Crty Council of the City of Bremerton, Waslungton tlus day of , 2011 , Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST ROGER A LUBOVICH, Crty Attorney CAROL ETGEN, Crty Clerk R U.egal�Legal�Resolutions�Execuhve\Westside Recephon Center docx - Westsade Receptaon Center 4� � �Ge O ; � y � C N t � ,iC�' STATE OF WASH�NGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORttECTIONS P O Box 41100 • Olympia Washington 98504-1100 • Tel (360) 725-8500 November 10, 2010 Western Washington Stakeholders SUBJECT Site Selechon for a Department of Corrections Pnson Recephon Center Dear Local Official The Legislature mstructed us to build a new correctional facility in Western Washington to mcrease our cost-efficiency and keep up with a pro�ected mcrease m the offender popularion Engrossed Subst�tute House Bi112836 provided us with funds to find a locahon and pay for pre-design costs We are m the process now of searching for an appropnate site for a facility that will serve as the recephon for all male mmates as they begxn their pnson sentences We invde all commumties in Western Washmgton to propose a site Jurisdichons mterested m proposmg a s�te should subm�t their proposals by January 6, 2011. Here are answers to frequently asked questions about the siting process What is a recephon center� A reception center is the first place offenders amve after they are sentenced to mcarceration m a state pnson The reception center serves as the location for mihal mtake and assessment of mcommg offenders Physical and mental health, and secunty needs are evaluated, and long-term placement is determmed Offenders throughout the state are transported to the recephon center and, after assessment, will be assigned to correctional facilities elsewhere m the state Because the reception center serves the enhre men's conectional system, access to ma�or highways is a very important considerahon The specific design and layout of the fac�lity are yet to be determmed, and we hope to work with a host community on issues of access, design and operation How can a s�te be proposed� Commumties interested m submittmg a site or sites for consideration should submit a letter of mterest no later than January 6, 2011 This expression of mterest is non-bindmg, but mdicates a commttment to provide requested site data by January 21, 2011 and participate m the site selection process Please see the attached cntena for mformation that must be submitted by the January 6, 2011 and January 21, 2011 deadlines All potential sites owned by public or pnvate entittes submitted for considerarion must ongmate from the elected body — city, county, port or tnbe — that has Junsdiction over the property "Workmg Togefher for SAFE Communrt�es" � Westside Pnson Receprion Center November 10, 2010 � ( , Page 2 of 2 ', �_ Independent submittals from pnvate parties, non �unsd�chonal public agencies, or other organizahons will not be considered � � Local govemments are encouraged to review this site sohcitation with their commumty The lmk to the DOC Sitmg Web page is httn //hnyurl com/DOCPnsonSitui� which mcludes supporting documents and a Frequently Asked Questions page i what happens after proposed s�tes are subm�tted? '' We will conduct an mitiai screenmg oftl,e submitted sites to determme whether they meet mmimum qualificahons Based on the fmdings of thac �creemng, we v�nll conduct a more specific assessment of the suitability of sites based on a range of physical, environmental, engmeeruig, and community charactenstics This review is intended to narrow the field to approximately three of the most suitable sites, which will then be evaluated in detail through development of an Envuonmental Impact Statement (EIS) Final site selechon is expected to be completed by late 2011 How wdl the Department work with tocal commumhes? After sites are submitted for consideration, our pro�ect team will work m partnership with local governments to address queshons, clanfy data and keep them appnsed of the selection process as it progresses ( Each commun�ty is responsible for leadmg theu local public process in consideruig the proposed site or sites Commumties are strongly encouraged to begui early in considenng and developmg the public outreach process that will be the most effective and informahve for your cirizens The Department is ready to serve as a resource m local commumty discussions How can I find out more informahon� Attached �s a list of site submittal requirements We developed a website at httn //hnvurl com/DOCPnsonSihng to provide additional mformation about the proposed facility and the site selechon process You may submit queshons through this website and we will post responses on a regular basis We appreciate your considerahon of th�s opportun�ty and look forwazd to workmg in partnership with you Sincerely, � v� Eldon Vail Secretary t EV sc Enclosure Attachment Site Submittal Requirements Site Submittal Requ�rements The criteria listed below ident�fy the essential requirements for the future Department of CoITections Reception Center If you w�sh to propose a site, please provide the requested mformat�on listed below for each site proposed for consideration Instructions to Subm�tters 1 All �nitial letters of interest are due to the Department of Corrections by 5 00 pm, January 6, 2011 Letters must contain the information described below 2 All supplemental information is due to the Department of Corrections by 5 00 pm, January 21, 2011 Two complete copies of this mformation must be provided in electronic format (pdf, �pg or GIS fdes) on compact disc 3 All proposals should be sent to Department of Corrections ATTN Pebble Hernandez Street Address 7345 Lmderson Way, Tumwater, WA 98501 Mad Address PO Box 41112, Olympia, WA 98504-1112 E-mad Address receptioncentersit�ng@doc wa gov Site Screenin Criteria . -. . � � �_ � . .. . . Parcel Sae ' '� - CrKena Size, configuration ❑ Site v�cimty map No add�tional mformation ❑ Site map at a scale of required Essential Charactenstics Developable area 1"=200' or 1"=400'showing of 35 usable acres mmimum, 40 to 50 is total area, lot dimensions, preferable ad�acent r�ghts-of-way, and all easements Avadabd�ty fot bevelopm�ent -- Criter�a Avadabdity, price, potential to ❑ Statement of interest from � Statement of properry owner meet development schedule the �ur�sdiction in which the interest Essentiai Charedenstics Site is avadable s�te is located indicating ❑ Assessed value for purchase and development that the site is avadable for � Recent appraisal reports, if purchase avadable � Recent title report and underlymg documents, if avadable Sne Constramts Criteria Designated Critical Areas ❑ Statement identifying the ❑ Parcel map showing cr�tical (wetlands, streams, crtt�cal aqwfer recharge criteria met by the site, any area and related areas, frequently flooded areas, criteria that the site does setbacks/buffers, cultural geologically hazardous areas, fish/wddiife not meet, and resource and contaminated habitat conservation areas), ident�fied recommendations for area constraints shown cultural resource sites, �denti�ed on-s�te resolvmg deficiencies ❑ GIS layers for des�gnated a-1 C Site Screenin Criteria . .. ., , . ... . . contammation, site sod condit�ons, s�te crit�cal areas dramage conditions O Description of site sod Essential characterfstic S�te constra�nts conditions allow flexibdity in site development � Map locations of known opt�ons dramage constraints, if any '�"i'"" °1't ` �.v �t� � t r� T- y t �. � 2' d > � d' �. .� � "i P'w ,�4i "` �§.rkk +,.G�s :� �=i�'�r''fo :: r�" {`-� _'' F; r'�< "� �` „e � :� y�'a.. `'y� ..% � w I.�ndU�se -, Aw 5 � S�� x Y�` A" £t'a p' f K�ti��'� _: j�� ^r �"� Y a_'sr 1 � a� �i° r.- � x Criteria Comprehensive Plan designation, O Statement identifying the 0 Comprehensive Plan, including toning designat�on, required land use cr�tena met by the site, any maps and graph�a perm�ts/review process, Essent�al Public criteria that the site does 0 if avadable, GIS layers for Faalities process not meet, and existing land use, Essential charactenstic Comprehensive recommendat�ons for comprehensive plan and Plan and zomng designations are consistent resolwng deficiencies zonmg code with proposed correctional fac�hty use 0 Apphcablecode provisions, including development standards, streets�rights-of- way, enwronment, impact fees, water, sewer, stormwater and any other C apphcable regulat�ons • � Essential Public Facilities process requirements �l't�`" .., ` m��`} '� s�? 4i 4= r..u,r:.T,- �*' -• �'3 �4�a �„-''t s.-'�»5 v�. 4 n-k✓r ,.,, ri + i s,rs K av ��- y S i�� r tvfi�i�= }a.""::� �`�N1��5-� y 3_ _ P V t � 1 S YI rt y , ' i �-�..� !+ � � 1�� N�r Criteria Fire flow, water service � Statement ident�fyring the � Estimate of fire hyd�ant flow (potable/non-potabie),sanitary sewer critena met by the site, any and pressu�e at srte serv�ce, electrical service, natural gas, cr�teria that the site does � Water, sewer and other utdity communications/IT connect�vity, capacity not meet, and comprehensive plans for rad�o commurncation recommendations for O If avadable, GIS layers for Essent�al characteristic Serwces are resoiving defiaenaes water, sewer and other avadable or planned for the site applicable utdity systems � If applicable, local govemment capital facdities plans �_ - v �:r tr �� T :- �.. � �. .. i � ` _ L .� Transport�tion _ �� '�'r � .. `�-�`� "� V`�'� �- a r r r'� � ; ��,��- �° :�aM� ;�� a SY ' : Criteria Distance from Interstate 5 or ❑ Statement that the site O�anity map of site �n relation Interstate 90, travel route charecteristics meets or exceeds the to I-5 and/or I-90 (number of lanes, alternate routes for local essential characteristic for 0 Travel time (peak/off-peak) access road, seasonal availabdity) transportation criteria and d�stance to I-5 and t-90 Essential characteristic Less than 30 � Adopted functional mmutes dr�ve t�me (weekday off-peakj to class�flcation map showing either I-5 or 1-90 Travel route to I-5 or i-90 loca) access street(s) to site consists of at least a two-lane arterial road 0 Photos of ex�sting access with drivable shoulders that is clear and street(s) to site passable during all seasons � History of weather-related access route closures � � A-2 Site Screenm Criteria �, .• � . .. - . . Emergency Services Cr�tena Fire, police, emergency medical ❑ Statement describing how ❑ Police and fire serwce plans capacity and response times the site meets or exceeds ❑ If applicable, local government Essential characteristic Professionally the essential charaderistic capital facdities plans staffed emergency services are avadable for emergency service ❑ If applicable hospital district and wdling to respond to a DOC faulity critena plans or annual reports Proxim�ty to PopulaUon Centers Criteria Distance to urban area � Statement that the site ❑ Vicmity map of s�te in relation Essential charactenstic Within or ad�acent meets or exceeds the to designated urban growth to designated Urban Growth Area essential charecterist�c for center proximity to population center critena Prox�mity to Shoot�ng Range Cr�ter�a Distance within 60 mdes for ❑ Statement identifying the � Vicinity map of site in relation handguns and 100 mdes for long guns critena met by the site, any to designated law Essential charactenstic The facdity must criteria that the site does enforcement shooting range have schedule capaaty and allow the use of not meet, and DOC weapons for practice and qualification recommendations for resolwng defiaencies A-3 S�Ung a New Wests�de Recept�on Cerner - FAQs http //www doc wa govlbusmessicap�talprogramslprisons�hngf faq asp � Department of ��rrections R1 A S M 1 N G T O V 5 T A T C Frequently Asked Questions Westside Reception Center Site Selection and Environmental Impact Statement Scoping • Can I arran�e a tour of a DOC facilitv� New� • What are the �ro�ected util�tv needs for thls �)ect? ated� • Can DOC co locate w�th a local �overnment in a facility shared w�th a municinal nol�ce dena�rtment� New� •�"lill DOC nrov�de ass�stance �n r»bl�c educat�on and outrea�ch orts� �Vew! • Can mulb�le�unsdichons support the same site? �Tew! • Can a commun�ty identi�'y more than one site pronosal for cons�deradon� ..An,.,.�..o� rHp np�a��t nf Correct�ons need a new recent�on center� .�... ., • Who aQproved fund�ng,.th�s proaect� • �,aw much w�ll construchon cost� • What �s a recgphon center? • Who �nnll be housed at e recephon center� • How lar�e is the proposed recepbon center� • A e there similar facil�hes �n Washin on? • What are the stens �nvo ved �n the s�hng.process of the recephon center� • What �s the current sihng schedule� • �1hat is the s�t�ng area? • What makes s�te suitable for placement of a recephon center� • What are the s�hn� cr�ter�a� • �an the rece�t�on center hP c,rP� �n a commumtv that does not want it� • Who is res�onsible for selechr�g a�te� � How will a new recenhon center affect mv community� •�"Jill there be an increase in the numhPr c,f nffpnders released in to roy communitv� • Will th�s facihty draw of�ender famtlies to our commun�tv3 • What k�nd of commumty �nvolvement w�ll there be in the site selechon nrocess� •�".�at lcind of�ob o�po �nih w�ll there be at th r �bon center? • What are the benefits of having the recent�on center in a commun�ty� • How �nnll the recept�on center affect traf�'ic� • How can im�acts be m�t�ated? • Where will ggods and sernces come from� • How can I be involved in the process� Q. Can I arrange a tour of a DOC facilifiy? A The ma�n facihtv web page has �nformation for indtv►dual facility visitmg rutes and schedules i �f � n l!4(20l 1 10 32 AM Sihng a New Westside Reception Ce�rter - FAQs http //www doc wa �v/bus�r�ss/capitalprograms/pr�sons�hngf faq asp Back to To,� �_ Q. What are the projected utility needs for this project? Utility Service Amount Potabte Water - Average 102,400 gpd Potable Water - Peak 179,200 gpd F�re flow 360,000 gal (2,000 gpm for 120 m�nutes) Sewer Volume - Avg Daily 92,160 gpd Sewer Flow - Peak Hour 128 gpm Sewer BOD - Average 250 mg/1 � • • Sewer BOD - Average 225 Ibs/d Sewer BOD - Range 200 - 300 mg/1 Sewer TSS - Average 250 mg/1 Sewer TSS - Average 2251bs/d Sewer TSS - Range 200 - 300 mg/1 Gas-connected load 27,000 cu ft/hr Power-Connected load 7 mega watt Power-Operational load 3 mega watt Up to 300 enterta�nment telev�s�on locat�ons i Customer-owned opt�cal fiber and coax�al cable d�str�but�on system from servue Cable TV entrance location 2�fio - - Sitmg a New Wests�de RecepUon Center - FAQs http //www doc wa gov/bus�ness/capitalprogramslpnsonsit�ngf faq asp One serv�ce to support 600 vo�ce pa�rs for adm�rostrat�on Second serv�ce to support approx 50 �nmate telephone pa�rs Copper serv�ce or der�ved from aphcal fiber Telephone data serv�ce S�ngle-mode (10 Gb/s) opt�cal fiber, Data via Opt�cal Fiber 22-strands (includes spare) Back to Ton Q. Can DOC co-locate with a local government in a facility shared with a municipal police department? A Yes, but the local government must provide the�r fmancial share for their spaces or area used Back to Ton Q. Will DOC provide assistance in public education and outreach efforts? A Will DOC prov�de ass�stance m public education and outreach efforts� Back to Ton Q. Can multiple jurisdictions support the same site? A Yes and this is encouraged if d�fferent �urisdict�or�s control resources important to a site For example, a property �n county �urisdiction, but needing wastewater support from a nearby city should �ndicate support from both �ur�sdictions A state agency owned property can be nommated by a local government with written concurrence of the state agency Back to Ton Q. Can a community identify more than one site proposal for consideration? A Yes Back to Ton Q. Why does the Department of Corrections need a new reception center? 3of10 �ienn�i in �� wn� S�hng a New Wests�de RecepUon Cer�ter - FAQs http //www doc wa gov/bus�ness/cap�talprograms/pnsons�hngf faq asp Back to Ton C A The Washington Caseload Forecast Council predicts a bed shortage for male offenders in Washington State by 2016 The need is also driven by the legislature's decision to close old and mefficient housing units around the state It would cost less to construct new buildmgs than it would to bring some of the existing buildings up to current standards for fire protection, earthquake, energy and environmental requirements And the new units would cost less to maintain and operate in the long run While the Legislature approved funds to find a locat�on and pay for pre-design costs, legislators have not yet approved the funds for construction The construction dollars will be requested in the future Back to To� Q. Who approved funding this project? A Funding for site selection and predesign was provided in the Supplemental Budget which was approved by the 2010 Legislature $ack to To.� �� Q. How much will construction cost? A The estimated construction cost of the pro�ect is $167 mill�on Back to Ton Q. What is a reception center? A. A reception center is the first place offenders go after sentencing Offenders are brought to the facility from local �ails throughout Washington State Their physical and mental health is assessed, security and management needs are evaluated, and long-term placement is determined After these steps, the offenders are assigned to other correctional facilit�es m the state Back to Ton Q. Who will be housed at the reception center? A The proposed 1,024-bed reception center v►nll house male offenders �nnth new convictions for an average of four weeks During this time, all offenders admitted to the facility for a new conviction will be managed as close-custody The facility could also house offenders moving from one facility to another, custody � levels for these offenders range from min�mum-to maximum-custody The Department of Corrections uses a well-established screen�ng process to determine the appropriate custody level for each offender This process ensures an adequate level Sihng a New Westside Recephon Center - FAQs http //www doc wa gov/business/capitalprograms/pr�sonsit�ngf faq asp of staff supervision and secur�ty necessary to maintain public safety The facility will prov�de recept�on beds, segregation beds, and program areas for intake, assessment, classification, food service, health services, administration, and support services Back to Ton Q. How large is the proposed reception center? A The estimated space need for the building �s 356,000 gross square feet The Department of Corrections is lookmg for an area that can support the estimated space layout Back to Ton Q. Are there similar facilities in Washington? A The Department of Correct�ons does not have a stand-alone reception center with a single mission and goals related to transitioning offenders through the statewide corrections system The Washington Corrections Center (WCC) in Shelton, WA, currently provides reception operations for the agency Building a new recept�on center will restore WCC to its original role as a multi-custody prison, providing additional beds indentified by the caseload forecast for the future Back to Ton Q. What are the steps involved in the siting process of the reception center? A The site selection process will occur in five stages as shown in the graphic below The first step is site idenhficatton, identifying those sites that communities believe meet the minimum criteria These potential sites will then go through site screening to determine which ones are likely to meet more site-specific criteria The candidate sites that remain after screening w�ll be rigorously evaluated "on the ground" through a site analysis assessment stage to determine which three sites should be analyzed in an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) The EIS will collect and compare data on the alternative sites and perform an �mpact evaluat�on under State of Washington environmental requirements The final step is acyuisit�on and development of the site Snflll �idnn>> >n z� enn S�t�ng a New JNests�de RecepUon Cemer • FAQs t� /lwww doc wa gov/bus►ness/cap�talprograr�/pnsons�hng/faq asp ^ I `� � • � � � T i '`' � { n�� }{Y � � ix :`.r e %�f � ' � � � v_ f % �i°s }, p -, i� i` �'` i �� 1 • � � }ti`~ fl � �� ` � • � �x x�� 4 '' u '>� r � 0� yi?•.� y � ��_ x s • - • �;`�'�.�, � ,;r++� k �ti� 5 � i� � � E L.��t S ��r � � ��y p �� }CC.V� �z • • � � 7 Fe.:,"� � ?K �$� � � • � i �...t ` `��.� ��,� � , � w s� � �, � �.r �t�,�,� �,� � lr' i'�. "'. �� z,� -n {�� rF � r �µ>fr • • � • ".n r� }..�f' .�� x e� oS • � �1 Back to To� � Q. What is the current siting schedule? A ln�tial letter of �nterest must be submitted by January 6, 2011, and site data must be submitted to the Department of Correchons by January 21, 2011 The site selection and EIS process are planned to be completed by December 2011 Back to To� Q. What is the siting area? A The fac�lity will be sited at a location in Western Washmgton that best meets the siting critena The Department of Corrections �s seeking a location that meets community, government, and sustainability goals This effort requires the Department to work closely with local communities to conduct a step-by-step process that ident�fies appropriate sites, provides for community part�cipat�on, and comprehens�vely evaluates all poss�ble s�tes. Back to Ton Q. What makes a site suitable for placement of a reception center? � A A detailed list of site crrteria is detailed in the November 10th letter However, initial s�te cr�ter�a will be based on the following characteristics Sitmg a New Wests�de Reception Cerner - FAQs http //www doc wa gov/busmess/cap�talprograms/pr�sons�hngf faq asp � Parcel s�ze and developabie area of a min�mum of 35 acres with a preferred area of 40-50 acres o Ava►lab►lity of the s�te for acqu�sihon and development, • Presence of s�te constraints, such as cr�tical areas, contaminat�on or �dent�f�ed cultural resources, • Cons�stency with adopted land use pol�cies, • Presence of ut�lit�es and capacity to serve the facility, • Capac�ty of emergency service prov�ders to serve the facil�ry, • Proxim�ty to populat�on centers for workforce and serv�ces, and • Access to a pr�mary highway Back to Ton Q. What are the siting criteria? A The list of siting criteria is available on the procurement area of this website If a community is interested in submitting a s►te or sites for consideration, a letter of interest must be submitted to the Department of Corrections no later than January 6, 2011 Express�on of interest is non-binding, but indicates a commitment to prov�de requested site data by January 21, 2011 and participate in the selection process with the Department Sites may be properties owned by public or private entities However, all site proposals must originate from the elected body (e g City, County, Port, or Tribe) with Jurisdiction for the proposed site Independent submittals from private parties, non-Jurisdictional public agencies, or other organizations w�ll not be considered Back to Tou Q. Can the reception center be sited in a community that does not want it? A The Department of Corrections is committed to being a good neighbor This commitment starts wtth the site select►on process In order for a facility to be sited successfully, communities expressmg interest in hosting the faciltty must demonstrate their own commitment to involve local leaders and citizens in stte selection and facility design Back to Ton Q. Who is responsible for selecting a site? A The Department of Corrections is responsible for selecting a s►te Th�s will begin with an initial screenmg analysis to identify whether the proposed sites meet minimum qualifications Based on these f�ndings, the Department will conduct a more specific assessment of the suitabtltty of sttes based on a range of physical, environmental, engineering, and commun►ty characteristics This review is intended to narrow the field to three of the most suitable sites, which will then be evaluated in detail through an � �fin . ,,,.,,,.. .„ ,.,. ... S�tmg a New Wests�de Recept�on Cerrter - FAQs http //www doc wa gov/bus��ss/capitalprograms/pnsonsihnp,�faq asp Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) We anticipate final site selection by December ' 2011 � Back to To� Q. How will a new reception center affect my community? A To meet the day-to-day needs of staff and offender population, community services are required Potential impacts mclude mcreased demand for local services, such as fire protection, emergency response and medical care, water and sewer service, and law enforcement Local roadway improvements may also be required These impacts are site-spec�fic and depend on the size of the community and its ability to provide these services Once a site is selected, the Department will continue to inform and involve the chosen community in facility design, operation, and oversight The Department will also lead a process that promotes an atmosphere of transparency and community partnership The impacts of the facility �nnll be idenhfied and agreed to by the community and the Department before a final s�te selection is made Back to To� Q Will there be an increase in the number of offenders ( released in to my community? A No The offenders passing through the reception center are only there for a short time before bemg moved to a different institution to serve their sentence In addition, Washington State law requires that offenders releasing from pr�son return to their original county of origin Back to Ton Q. Will this facility draw offender families to our community? A Because inmates only reside at this facility for a short time on the way to the longer term facility, there would be little value in any family moving to the area of the reception center Back to Ton Q. What kind of community involvement will there be in the site selection process? A After sites are submitted for consideration, the Department of Corrections pro�ect team will work m partnership with local governments to address questions, clarify data, � and keep the community apprised of the selection process as it progresses Each community �s respons�ble for leading their local publ�c process m considering the proposed site(s) We strongly encourage commun�ties to get an early start on Sit�ng a New Wests�de Reception Center - FAQs http //www doc wa gov/busmess/capitalprograms/pnsons�hng/faq asp developing an effective public outreach process The Department and the consulting team are staffed to serve as a resource in local community d�scussions Back to Ton Q. What kind of job opportunities will there be at the reception center? A Positions at the reception center will range from healthcare professionals to warehouse employees Many of the positions are likely to go to people living near the site Substantial efforts will be made to site the facility where qualified workers can be recruited locally Washington State Department of Personnel qualifications and procedures will apply Training �s provided to all staff employed at the facil�ty to ensure ongoing community safety To provide an estimate of the posszble �obs for a community the current reception center employs • 322 Correctional off�cers and other custody staff • 185 Administrat�ve, maintenance and operat�ons staff • 79 Health care professionals Back to Ton Q. What are the benefits of having the reception center in a community? A[n addition to local employment and purchases, other local economic development opportunities typical of any new industry can be expected Correctional �obs provide law enforcement family wage employment opportunities at a variety of levels Back to Tou Q. How will the reception center affect traffic? A Traffic is an important factor for the Department and will most likely be a concern for the community surrounding the facility In order to minimize impact on local communities and to increase the Department's overall efficiency in transportation, one of the key screening criteria is that the site must be within 30 minutes drive time from Interstate S or Interstate 90 and be served by a local arterial As part of the EIS, thorough traffic stud�es will be completed on the fmalist sites to identify and minimize traffic impacts Public transportation options will also be assessed during the initlal site screening process Back to Tov Q. How can impacts be mitigated? A To offset community service demands d�rectly related to recept�on center 9 of 10 I/4/2011 ]0 32 AM Sihng a New Wests�de Recept�on Cetrter - FAQs Mtp //www doc wa gov/busmess/cap�talprograms/pnsons�hng/faq asp operat�ons, state law allows communities to apply for state assistance Pro�ect �— construction funds may be used to construct or expand local public works facilities , Reimbursement for crim�nal �ustice costs, contingency planning, and medical costs to cities and counties may also be requested The costs of mitigation will be determined and agreed to prior to final site selection Back to To„� Q. Where will goods and services come from? A The Department of Corrections will purchase a wide variety of goods and services in the commun�ty Local purchases typically include building materials, automotive parts and repairs, electronic supplies, Janitor�al supplies, and utilities Services such as dental care, health care, pest control, and fire protection are also often locally contracted Back to Ton Q. How can I be involved in the process? A Please v�sit the pro�ect website for addit�onal mformation about the proposed facility and the s�te select�on process You may submit questions through the website Responses will be posted on a regular basis Back to Ton f � �n,.c�n -•-•---- -- -- --- � � � � � , , � � • � � Forsyth Gunty Law Enfsraement an� Detenti�n Center e � � �' '� \ °''' � !� � s � � � � .� s •� �'' � � ��' � �� , � � ,�. � , „� ,.� ��r . , �� : �, , ��: . �� : , � � :, , . � \' ` , � '� � � � - ` �_ �,:�'� �� `_� � ` • �,�,." � 1� � � j� >, � � �: ` �' ---_�. �\ ' .- - � •. ' . _�_—� . � ..._. ...�_.�,� - . . �.i. : �r�lw II � - : � a � - ; ..' . � , � ` � I � . �n . �� ,��11 _ . � , i� —_� _ � - ' . -" _ . .'��a ��-' '_ �- - -- ,r - — .. �+-`�^---.+�r.*r,:'a.,..'' - . _ ' �' . . _..��.��R � �" .. _ _ . _ , , °.- �'.� '- '" . -.."""'"""r!�. ' . � _. -- ' - -- ` � W t Va e Dete nt i o n Ce nte r es y �e� o o � --- --___1___ � `� � �� . _ . _ , �� . � �� _ � ' � �. � � � — ��, �, �-- , _ � �� ,� ,, � � , , � - { ' � � � d {9 � — � { , , � �- � ' i , � �' ` � �"° �... � . � _ ' ' G �� , I r _ — -� ` �� - - ;�..— � ■ �I ' � _ �} �.... i � . .� t � t , � � � - n , _i .. � � + � '''°` y `�`��'!"* �e' 1 L� ° � v n � �✓�, t , ^ 3 ` " �-^^-. aat _ _ �1s=-�."'-.":? � „� � _ ____ U ster Cou nt Law En orcement v - . o �.. ��. .� �i �t �� ,� . �, . � � _ a� � � ,� i i�� _ � I � � � � �r q � � �� ! i � � l' t � � r ` - � N I, � � � �i� ! � � ' � � ° I ,, _� � < �� ,�� . a � � � � '--- � -, 1 ! � t _. n-� i � , � , � � �� _ � � — y _ �� i --� � � y�__" �� j' t �a.�a" 1 J• � t r s � � y 1 " �' -. - � r' � ��{ � `� ( � ' �, �� t � � �