HomeMy WebLinkAbout5094 ORDINANCE NO. 50 q �'
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending the Comprehensive Plan, as
follows: Amend the Land Use Map to reflect cartographic updates;
update the City Services Element and Appendix integrating
applicable plans previously adopted and the 2010-2015 Capital
Improvement Program; update the Transportation Element and
Appendix to reference the Non-Motorized Transportation Plan and
inclusion of the 2010-2015 Transportation Improvement Program;
amend the City Services Element and Appendix to adopt the new
2008 Stormwater Management Plan Update; amend Transportation
Element to adopt the Commute Trip Reduction Program and; change
land use designations for a portion of the Kitsap Lake Reserve Center
from Neighborhood Business to Limited Commercial.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton adopted a Comprehensive Plan on December
1, 2004 by Ordinance No. 4917 and has been subsequently amended by Ordinances No.; 4954,
� 4962, 4985, 4998, 5025, 5034, 5037, 5062, 5077, and 5082 hereinafter referred to as the
"Comprehensive Plan"; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires
internal consistency among comprehensive plan elements and applicable regional plans; and
WHEREAS, to assure that comprehensive plans remain relevant and up to date,
the GMA requires each jurisdiction to establish procedures whereby amendments to the plan are
considered by the City Council (RCW 36.70A.130(2)), and limits these amendments to once
each year unless an emergency exists; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has established a procedure for amending the
Comprehensive Plan in Title 20.10.010 of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC), that limits
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to no more than once each year; and
WHEREAS, consistent with RCW 36.70A.106 the 60-day notice period began on
September 1, 2009 when the Washington State Department of Community, Trade, and Economic
Development received notification of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment docket for 2009; and
r WHEREAS, no public comprehensive plan amendment applications were
submitted in the 2009 Comprehensive Plan amendment docket and all amendments are initiated
by staff to address changing circumstances relative to land use needs and the need to create
consistency between all city planning documents and the Comprehensive Plan; and
�
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2009 the public was notified by a legal
advertisement in the Kitsap Sun of the opportunity to make comment and participate in the
public hearing by the Planning Commission; and
1
2009 Comp Plan Amendment
WHEREAS, on August 31, 2009 a SEPA DNS was issued for amendment docket
with an administrative appeal deadline of September 14, 2009 and no appeals were filed; and
WHEREAS, on September 15, 2009 the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on the 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket, and the Planning Commission
recommended the City Council approve the amendments with a minor modification; and
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2009 the public was notified by a legal advertisement
in the Kitsap Sun of the opportunity to make comment and participate in the public hearing by
the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2009 the City Council conducted a public hearing
and considered all testimony prior to their decision; and
WHEREAS, the proposal meets requirements of the Washington State Growth
Management Act (GMA); and
WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with Kitsap County Countywide Planning
Policies (KCCPP).
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The findings and conclusions adopted by the Planning
Commission on September 15, 2009 and attached hereto as Exhibit A are adopted and
incorporated as if set forth fully herein.
SECTION 2. The City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended by
approving and adopting docket items 1-6 as follows:
Docket Items:
1. Land Use Map: Amend the Land Use Map (Pg. LU-46) to show cartographic
updates, and correct City boundaries, more particularly described in Exhibit B
affixed hereto.
2. Citv Services Element & Appendix: Update to the City Services Element and
Appendix to reflect previously adopted plans from Parks, Water, and Wastewater
and their Capital Improvement Programs, more particularly described in Exhibits
C.1 & C.2 affixed hereto.
3. Transaortation Element & Appendix: Amend the Transportation Element, with
the addition of text referencing the previously adopted 2007 Non-Motorized
Transportation Plan, and the addition of the 2010-2015 Capital Improvement
Program into the Transportation Appendix, more particularly described in
Exhibits D.1 & D.2 affixed hereto.
2
2009 Comp Plan Amendment
4. Inclusion of the Stormwater Management Plan Update: Amend the City
Services Element with text updates, reflecting new data and information and
adoption of the 2008 Stormwater Management Program Update and the addition
of the 2010-2015 Capital Improvement program, more particularly described in
Exhibits E.1 & E.2 affixed hereto.
5. Inclusion of the Commute Trip Reduction Pro�ram: Amend the
Transportation Element with text updates adopting the Commute Trip Reduction
Program, more particularly described in Exhibit F affixed hereto.
6. Change in Land use Designation: Amend designations in the Kitsap Lake
Reserve Center from Neighborhood Business (NB) to Limited Commercial (LC)
for parcels north of Kitsap Way, more particularly described in Exhibit G affixed
hereto.
SECTION 3. Severabilitv. If any provision of this ordinance is held invalid or
unconstitutional, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or
constitutionality of the remainder of this ordinance. Provided however, that if any provision of
this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional, then the provision in effect prior to the
effective date of this ordinance shall be in full force and effect for that individual provision as if
this ordinance had never been adopted.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law.
�
PASSED by the City Council the day of ' , 2009
� `�
����
CECIL McCO ELL, Council President
cr,
Approved this � day of ` , 2009
��f;�it.� C
CECIL McCONNELL, Mayor Pro tem
3
2009 Comp Plan Amendment
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
��G
CAROL ET N, ity Cle RO R A. LUBOVICH�t�a
PUBLISHED the � day of .� , 2009
EFFECTIVE the day of , 2009
ORDINANCE NO. �jQ J'�
4
2009 Comp Plan Amendment
� Exhibit A
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS �
OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION
2009 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket
i. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Project Description . .
The City considers Comprehensive Plan amendmenfs annually. The intent
� of this year's amendment process is to only make minor changes and corrections
to the Comprehensive Plan. The six changes on the dacket are: Adoption of
Official Land Use Map for minor cartographic updates; update City Services
Element and Appendix and adopt Capital Impravement Program; update the
Transportation Element and Appendix and adapt Transportation Improvement
Program; amend City S�rvice Element and Appendix to adapt the 2008 ,
Stormwater Management Plan Update; amend the Transportation Element to
adopt the Commute Trip Reduction Program; official land use rnap amendment
regarding a change in land use designation from Neighborhood Business ta
Limited Commercial in the Kitsap Lake Rese►ve �enter.
2. Procedura! History
2.1 On August 31, 2q09 staff noti�ed the Department of Cammunity, Trade
and Economic Development of the intent to adopt amendments ta the
Comprehensive Plan.
2.2 On August 31, 2009 Staff published the SEPA Determination of Non-
significance in the Kitsap Sun.
2.3 On September 1, 2009 the Draft Amendment Docket was available for
public review on the City of Bremerton's website.
2.4 On September 5, 2009 a notice of P(anning Commissian public hearing
was pubEished in the Kitsap Sun and the public was invited to camment.
2.5 On September 15, 2009 Planning Commission canducted a public
hearing on the 2009 Comprehensive Plan docket.
3. Pubtic Comment
3.1 Individuals submitting writtan comments:
a. Mark & Patty Nesby, 1295 Lakehurst Dr, Bremerton WA 9$312
b. Chuck & Patty Bair, Kitsap Lake Storage {360) 373-640a
c. Gruss Inc, 6724 Kitsap Way, Bremerton WA
d. Symington, 3233 Chico Way NW, Bremertan WA 98312
� 3.2 lndividuals providing verbal testimony at PEannirtg Commission public
hearing:
�. �i�1u�. f�112- , Cvyc>n k�k�aP waT� Brenn-er WA�-
b. _�1_i��k Ne,sby , to�?.o t�t�-sq� wy , 8�e�-e�r�on �n�a-
c. �C t� r, ��C�P 1`� b� �t k� P�t� W y R�f�ern-er {-o,a w I�
d. T�er✓�� L.UAa{ 1�10 k�l-�rn� W�( ,�r�ev��er �, WA-
e.
f.
Exhibit A
4. SEPA Determination
A Determination of Non Significance (DNS) was issued on August 31, 2009 with
an appeal deadline of September 14, 2009.
5. Consistency
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall meet the decision criteria outlined
in BMC 20.10. The Planning Commission may recommencl, and the City Council
may adopt or adapt with modifications, an amendment to the comprehensive
plan if the criteria outlined below are met.
, 5.�1 BMC 20.10,080(a} allows amendments to the Comprehensive Plan if
there is an obvious technical error in the pertinent comprehensive pfan
provisions.
Amendment 1(Map cartographic updafesJ: The adoption of the updated
Comprehensive Land Use Map falls into this category due to cartographic errors.
Cartographic misrepresenfafions were identified and corrected.
5.2 BMC 20.18.020 (d) (1) allows amendments to the Comprehensive
Plan if it is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan.
These amendments (2-6) are minor and confinue to uphoJd the objectrves and
goals of Comprehensive Plan. These amendments do naf change the intent or
purpose of the Comprehensive Plan.
Amendment 2(Update to City Services Element and Appendix);
Multiple City departments have worked colfectivefy with the Department af
Community Develapment to integrate their respective plans into the
Comprehensive Plan, providing mare consistency and transparency within the
City's planning dvcuments.
This amendment integrates previousEy adopted City Service plans and their
201 Q-2015 Capital fmprovement Program into the City Services Element and
Appendix.
This arrtendment is consistent with many policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
reproduced here are a selection of these policies:
LU3 — Create an environment that will promote growth.
LU71— Provide for the viabrlrfy of communities, neighborhoads, and Cenfers
through strategic land use designations and infrastructure provisions.
LU19c — When developing and locating new infrastruc�ure and capita!
investments, ensure efficienf use of community resources.
LU99g — Ensure comprehensive and conveni�nt servrces for each community
within the City.
Amendment 3(Update to Transportafion Element and Appendix}:
The City's Engineering Division completed the Nan-Motorized Transportation
Plan and integrated it into the Comprehensive Plan during the 2007
Comprehensive P1an Amendments.
Exhibit A
This amendment addresses the need to add text into the Transportation Element
referencing the Non-Motorized Transportation Plan, and adopt the updatect 2010-
2015 Transportation fmprovement Program into th� Transportation Appendix.
This amendment is cansistent with many policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
reproduced f�ere are a selection of these policies:
CC2f — Create and improve urban open spaces.
CC3 — Provide far a safe, pleasant, and rich pedestrian experience. �
LU3 — Create an environment fhat will promote growth.
LU1Q — Provide lncentiv�s and flexibility fhat encourages and enable
development in Centers.
LU91c — When developing and locating new infrastructure and caprtal
investmenfs, ensure efficient use of community resaurces.
LUT 1g — E'nsure comprehensive and convenient services for each community
within the City.
Amendment 4(City Services Element and Appendix):
This amendment addresses the need to incorporate the updated Stormwater
Management Plan into the Comprehensive Plan for consistency between the
City's planning documents. Text updates are incorporated into the City Services
Appendix along with the 2010-2015 Capital Improvement Program.
The City adapted its Stormwater Managemen# Plan, an element of the
Camprehensive Plan, in 1996. Plan amendments are processed as conditions
warrant. This Update is due to changes in Federal and State laws, most notably
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES} Phase II Permit
and the Puget Sound Partnership's (PSP} agenda for cleaning the waters of the
Puget Sound. Stormwater management is regufated by BMC 15.04.
The scope of the 2008 update responds to the requirements of the NPDES
Phase If Permit, as well as the introduction of Low Impact Development (LID)
strategies in dealing with starmwater control.
This amendment is consistent with many policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
reproduced here are a selection of these policies: �
LU3 — Create an environment that will promofe growth.
LU10 — Provide lncentives and flexibility fhat encourages and enable
development rn Centers.
LU��c — When developing and locating new infrastructure and capital
rnvestments, ensure eff+cient use of communify resources.
LU11g — Ensure comprehensive and convenient services for each community
within the City.
LU15b — Protecf aquifer recharge areas, especially those used to provide public
wafer supplies (GMA Requirement).
LU15c — Coordinafe measures fo protect groundwater resources wifh watershed
plans and planning efforts (GMA Requirement).
E1— Ensure the lang-term healfh of Bremerton, promote sustainable growth and
actrvities. �
Exhibit A
E9c — Use, where feasible, new technologies that demonstrate ways fo reduce
environmental impacts.
E3 — Reduce and prevent environmentai pollution of air, water, Irght, noise, and
soil.
E3e - Education citizens about sources of pol(ufion.
E10 - Encourage environmentally responsible developmenf.
Amendment 5 (Transportation Element):
This arr�endment addresses the need to incarporate the updated Commute Trip
Reduction Plan into the Comprehensive Plan for consistency and transparency
between the City's planning documents. Text updates are incorporated into the
Transportation Element.
In 2006, the Washington State Legisfature passed the Commute Trip Reduction
E�ciency Act which amended the requirements for local governments in those
counties experiencing the greatest automobile-related air pollution and traf#ic
congestion to develop and implement p(ans to reduce single-occupant vehicle
trips. The Commute Trip Reduction Plan has been prepared in accordance with
these revisions to RCW 70.94.521.
The Commute Trip Reduction Plan is a collection of City-adopted goals and
policies, facility and service improvements and marketing strategies about how
the City will help make progress for reducing drive alone trips and vehicle miles
traveled over the next four years. Building upon #he success of the existing
commute trip reduction program, the City strives to meet the goals of the plan for
the future by working in partnership and coordination with other agencies and
employers. This Commute Trip Reduction Plan helps to support the
achievement of the City's vision and the goals of its comprehensive plan.
This amendment is consistent with many policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
reproduced here are a selection of these policies:
E1c — Use, where feasible, new fechnologies that demonsfrate ways to reduce
environmental impacts.
E3 — Reduce and prevent environmental pollution of air, water, Irght, noise, and
soil.
E3e — Education citizerrs about sources of pollution.
E10 — Encaurage environmenta!!y responsible development.
T1— Encourage the development of an integrafed mulfr-moda! transportation
system, that provides a variety of convenient transportaf�on choices to rmprove
fhe movement of people, goods, and freight.
T3 — Develop and maintain a fransportation system that respects the natural
environment, including the quality of Bremerton air, wafers, and natural habitats
T7 — Develop travel management strategies to minimize the need for addifional
transportation infrastructure and expenditure.
T7a — Continue to coordinate with loca! employers to implement commute trip
reduction plans and programs.
Amendment 6(Parcel land use change from A!B to LC):
Staff proposes a land use re-designation for the parcels north of Kitsap way from
Neighborhood Business to Limited Commercial. Prior to the 2004
Exhibit A
Comprehensive Pfan update fand use designation of this area was Generaf
Business which is equivalent to the new designation of Limited Commercial. The
intent of the Limited Commercial designation is to recognize the community's
existing general commercial districts outside the designated boundaries af
centers on lots zoned general business in the City. Staff praposes to reconcile
the zoning in this area to the previous designation of Limited Commercial.
This amendment is consistent with many policies of the Comprehensive Pfan,
reproduced here are a selection of these poticies:
� LU9b — Identifying and integrating edge areas in the planning of neighborhoods.
LU3 — Create an environment thaf wi!! promote growth.
LU3a — Modifies existing zoning ta provide for essential servic�s.
LU1 �— Provides for fhe vrability of communifies, neighborhoods, and Centers
through strategic land use designations and infrastructure plannrng.
5.3 BMC 20.18.020 altows amendments to the Comprehensive Plan if it
does not conflict with other City, state and federal codes, regulations
and ordinances,
Analysis: The amendments listed in the 2009 Comprehensive Plan
amendments do not conflict with any other regu�ations.
11. CONCLUSfONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings above, Planning Commission concludes that the 2009
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket has met the criteria for amendments to
the plan as detailed in BMC 20.10.080 and therefore recommends adoption by
�he City Council.
Resp4ctfuily submit#ed by: �
. ' � �� ./
' G'
' �xecutive retary
', /f �
��/
Approved by:
/� v�,�
Greg eeler, Chair
!1
Exhibit B
� �
Cit of Bremerton Official Land Use Ma
Y p
_ _____
.-m �: r � � . � , � " � � , t � �. R < < . �} ,.
Legend � � � � � - -
j� r , �. �� o � � , � � �a � � I � ' � � �i`�
� � r � � 7U � i
I
� O `� � I t r' � � :� _
�� {1 �, ''_ � '� ai� * � _
�,
} �i���OityLimits s. = � LimiletlCommeroial _ ��� � d , � _.�'� � r � �- ���� u�1C".�� I�LJ�4�S << �k m ��
... i _ � r. ..,�.. ... ,
'� Future Reserve Center Neighborhood Business I '� V � �- r �, � � ; F. �
� � AdopledSubAreaPlan - FreewayCorridor � �Q� •� , �=�� ��� � �a -UGA -�- W
� � P - '
, �
Tax Paroe�s � Industnal ; f �,f� �� �� D R'�►► FT � � � � � t � �'" b�USON �� � � = r
- Regional Center Industnal Park ;, 111 �� � � - {T� �' :��- � . - , J � ' y
�i �T } � � L I ��� ,..
;- DisMCt Center � Marine Industrial - � F 3 �� � � � I' "�" i,
��I; _�� a�t �> ,. I TRACY A�i � i
; - Manufacturing/Intluslrial Center - Higher Educa4on II � � ('k� fi� o.�e.r f F' ��� - �--.-�..._� , I i . ; f `:
I ,
� � �
�"'� Neighborhood Center Open Space � � + ��� � p'�,r� 1 � � ° �
___ � . ��� � _ ^ /` -:� � �� , �
- Employment Cenler Pu9et Sound Naval ShipyarC �� lmdi r ,}�, �� a z„��{� � �\ ¢ y `� r ``
._ �.... �s �
"t74 `�T y 1 � �n �N � / A ' Q � � � .. . � .
Low Density Resitlential �. Pudic Sector Redevelopment Site ` ' � � ��t LL1 , � - C�.i -.� : ;t, �:. S ` � IVY D W f f � � -__._.
7' y x° ,. . z� a .c��
Ciry Core Residential - Walershed u� r� �� I. � E -� ! f ' '���� f a .- J " ? � � i �`t , *,
i
- Canmercial Corridor City UUliry Lantls �p �, r'r� ����` ' ` � p� � F *'"' ' ° a ""^ �
� . � 1 � �� � Y , _ �
Wheaton Way Redevelopment Cwridor - Transportatbn, Utilities, and PuWic Faci�iUes r I ; . ��� I / �� 1 , _. � � � _ � � } _ �^ � � �} �
� �' � � , " �
O .� ir�� ir � �.� � �,_`. � a ! Y:� . � ���rl , ; �-� ,;,
zoo+c�na�a��wna,ca�wanq,��eam��-o � �'"�*� , 6 J ' O • Y � \ � S1'�ERI q ^ �ic �
caw� n� � d n�,ti��,a,��u- zoa ow�,� wsa. zoo� - w3�. zooe � o�a,.� wsz. sm aa. rw � J � r' _ -- ' p CJ . 1 � f f�- ( �
i � •
m wu ae �orea w� ue�� �w �� awwro w�co�s rre �.� a wo v���.�.aw.��o �a�worn a � � 1- i 1 t � � N . � � �,, 2 H � . '` �� �
m�e o�ro �e vo�wr ro� wie� a•waec ;. • �,. �
.. �.�. �: � y ,� <F � - I
, ° � _
�� Fw�rt'CwmmumYOOwWmwn�nm.n�ivDawr+M�+mrY3NrnvaVNwwE_4ruru�eiBmm�an.GY4rtlUwLLUTeW`Gm0�Da09.m�a � �� I �` O ! �}j',..... O,n.:nmV Z � � �VC��� ' f f ,.
Miles ` . . . / ''
0 03 O6 12 1.8 2.a I � ��,� �� � f'. `
o m '
� ._-__.' . .....' � � ';. __ ,r��_ � ,1.�`,_J . . � Poit ryas �
1 — � � ..� . F � , � �
� �� � � ; ' � ° 79TH S� , � � �
i I �- j �
� , H ST
-- I + _ I � _ � / ;
r- � � � O �. � I 15T � ��
� r ! - -�- � - � � � a�.,o�y,. J � �� tk.t� f '
I ���
I �
{- � � {- t ���� �/� p �, k a ' � " '��, 71TH ST E ��TF4 �T
I � � �,�++;�N' � � � !�
i� � � �!� �c,;i fz �IL 6TH ST-��w � TH S '
� s
�r� a III� �
_ �� �� • ��....w � i
' '' �_ �; >�� z � �' � sr :
�
__ .
i ! �'� ° = sF�A ' i � � , ¢ -
. �ER R � ' �
� � �.
��'y � E ST �
�EN Sr, �
(
� i ,, , /
_ � ,, � � � � ,
�.._._..�. i... . ,
, r-,; , � i �- � � � �
� , �- ---
• awl'#�������■ ,' �_ � ¢ �p.G
i
P �
� '���? � �% �0� j ": /, QQ , � ' � �
. � r�' . .� ' ` � aa
r� � y� 4 a ` \ � �. � Q � , � ,
o �` _ r,. 7
Q � Q � I I�F�� � '� �� -
.\ `
_. _
�, _�
� /" _`; � �'� �• 1 G� /a. �� `• � � �� '
�� �
.
�� �
m � Cit of Por Orchar ,
_
I �_ ,.� ,�.� � ti , �. , � �` �� �,�€�r
� ,_ :_-=_� � r �� �' . � � a� . a
�/ y ,� � ,
i .� L--„ �� ' - 1`'�� * ° 2 � � ' 1M „ _
�•� � �-� SOUTH ST P
�LLS R� � "{ •" O
��LFAIR VALLEY RD i t ��� �'x.,-� � I Q a- :Fu���
. > ; " .
� �� . � '' � ' ��� ���'���� _ ��
� r i � � ,'� � `' � w, �
� � ,
, � ....
„�.<��
_ : Q ,O - � ! _ ����/A ti���� � � � , � , > � ' G�"!a ' �,�, u_
. ■ . -� _:,�,y9V
, �
� Z : �..� � _ _ _ = ��i � f a . � i _� y�� �' Z � ��� `; ' a ('
�. �' � � � ; � , i �._",: L�._ �r Ng � ,;,�.� ¢ �'ort Orchard UGA � �.
�k , � � � �-� �}'.i � � � � � � ��, ..' #.� � ` 3 . . , � �� .
.� r ,, � ,
: '
� i fi T } , , z�
F �, ,�. , i t � I SALMONBERRY RD ..
`• , � � �!� �_ a � � �� BERR�LAKE �iq j� p � �
� -� � � � � �• 9� „�p� r f�! ' �Q. � -_--� ,. y, ,� u ,.� _ � ; �_ ,,
� � � � � U r , r t� � ;�, i � �+ � _ � � � �
> > c� � � �� �` � � � .
., _ &F�DC�WICK'R � ,----°
� � �� - �� � ��` ��P FD ����� i � " �
� ' �'l is , I �HARP 1
,
�. �
' ' � � � t 1 I i � . �` Q _- � -� � -- �_ ' ����� j1 � � �
, ^_
.., '. ; , � ; , , _-
� 1.
� � -;.� �''_! � i o z z � �. . �----�-., � � °� � ,� � ..i �,,�;�
� .�� �_ � � ` � , �,� ° ' �� �° . � � � � _� ,, �; r ` � � .: o� ��,� ' ,1���� ' � } � ��.
� � 4 ' ��
� � � , � � ' � � ' , '.. ��� '� ... � '�� ,' I I �_ � � � X
�`� F 1�.. � , � � � Q � � � If
� ;, . � �- ��
�� ' � � � n � � � � � � 1 � + � ��` I � : � �. � ` i � C �+ �6lJiaE� Ro� � .���
�, �¶ r � . r �� �
_. � � . � �� � � � � ( _. � z � Y��� r , � �� , ,- `.
� ° ' '� : �� i x �; � ���; � ,- �� y��� � � �� � �� � �
� � , �+ � � . ,_.� , ,.. — - -� �,� ... i f r it � '� ���'�I �,�._ t ,, . ,
',• � I1 }�
• L__.� � , � � r--. � -{� �i , � �.—
�� _ � � ,1 � .r � .�. ,� � - . �: � �.� .'
�' ' Z � -- : �� f r .. / ! .. .., ,i ��� �� �'t�-' . . i '
Q� '� 1 1 �.. L 1 1.- I I' �� I r �� t,� I y7 I� j •,;� �?,�` I
� t a_ _ 1 _ _- # ' �" 1 :� ;'.�� �1SI � ' , A � �� ,,- ���j"� . • � 1 ��, I x
{ � {. 1
� � _ � � � 1 r � I .,.� ' ��_, i � � � . �V � �� Y t l� � T � z � - � ' I
�. } _'=�- j - 1 � , � -
� � - �., �! , ' � �
{ � � '�L! _4_ � __ [ _
c� ` l+,; �r� !;� ) .h � ,i�.�'� �,t ��:. _�._< <' �, �,'�,��� �� ��` �
p �� ����� � � � L1 ' � ��� -�' '-, -. , _ � 1 N .
v i � ' �_ � .� �� �_ �-�� � �_ 1 � � �/ � 1 .�;. � 1 _ — ��� . ° �I_� � , 1� �f �� I� � z !f '� �
. -- ��� ��{` _ i- \ i �
� � - � � O�R s i < '...`�� k__ ::\� i....,t � +� ��_-- ���,---� � 6� .. ���� f F � ' � r A 4 ' O! >� �'
i !, � �^4t,AfCE�L . �% .- � / - � -�- � � ..� ! i � r �r�� - - �, � f- � � I s }�:� ' � � i I ��� ,�_� '�
r l___ . -,- �� � i���� 1--� �� �l i' Q ! ��� t � W� I�I I+ �r� �, ��� '�
�. � � � '� _ ; � r . � I �` -- ' ' -- •
_ �
� � � � � � �,'�€�;, ,_ � ,.� ��� � �� �x��il� � .F� '`: I� T �
! , ; �. ,, � , �
. , , , . _ ,
r .
;_ . , ' ' ' , ; oa � ' � f� ; ��
, , =: : ��� , '� ��
- : ,�
_ "
� w ,�i^
� ��� ��
,. _ ; � ., � j % r', J � �,
: ' � .
, , , � l_ , . .
I ___, .. ��' � � �
� i . . � W I ;._.... _. , , b m . W m , W ,..:. � ; �'',
; , : ` ��V�� ; ' ' � MISTY LN'4 . ; � � ��� � T � ¢ � 4�, ; ' a
' ' ! , � , � ., , ' � � � ::-� �' . Z = �,1
' Q �
' (x9 � ', p " �� f A ai' - � : � ¢
� r�• kVJ1�Y1lQ p _}V . E � £' ..,
,'- ; _ a�
,
� �� � . .- �� �
..� .-� �.- � l i t. � q L4 �
� �- . i � f � ,;_ ` '.' 7 � {��" � : � . 1
�
;- ,
. : , � . , � -- � . � � . . .:, , ;
, _.,. � . � . , . . . , - .
, Exhibit C.1
LOS Standards
The level of service expected by the community for each type of public service
discussed in this section, is identified within the section devoted to that service (see City
Service Appendix). For ease of reference, however, those Level of Service Standards are
summarized in the table below.
In the long term, approximately 20 years, Bremerton intends to achieve the level of service standards set
forth in the following table. (Table CF-1)
Table CF-i. Ca ital Facilit Level o Service Standards - Lon Term
Capital Facility Type Level of Service Standard (LOS) Date est.
Emergency Medical Services 4.0 minute response time for BLS
8.0 minute response time for ALS 1995
Fire 5.0 minute response time 1995
Law Enforcement 250 sq.ft. per officer 2003
1.8 officers per 1,000 pop. 2003
�a~�-s bec� . , .
�ar1ES--�eg�er�a� . , .
- �a�s--9�ex-�ee �.�� ae�es-ge� �,988�e�se�s �9���-ac-�es-���ta �°O>�
Neighborhood & Community Parks 5.5 Acres of Developed park land per 1,000 residents 2007
Sanitary Sewer 100 gallons per caprta per day (gpcd) �8A3
2005
Storm Water Management A�a��Ea���+e� �#�g-�e��k�-��e���va�e� s�a��ar�s ��
Maintain per Stormwater Management Manual for 2009
Western Washington
Schools - Elementary (K-5th) �Ta *
90 sq.ft. per student -.013 acres per student 2009
Schools - Middle (6th-8th) nra *
117 sq.ft. per student -.017 acres per student 2009
Schools - High (9th-12th) n¢a *
130 sq.ft. per student -.018 acres per Student 2009
Streets, transportation - Vaned. See Transportation Element 2003
Water 200 gal/day �99-3
City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan CS 21
City Services Element
Exhibit C.1
Capital Facility Type Level of Service Standard (LOS) Date est.
2005
�
1.... ...a..4n� ...Fti. 41.i. �nli. r...i..�....i.� �.F 4H� F:vn} i. i..�!-.....Le. L.. .. r.a
.,., .f�-�.u..� .
Use of varied LOS Standards to support community goals
The establishment of Level of Service Standards that support the desired land use
pattern - and the related effect of concurrency requirements - can provide a very strong
incentive, encouraging future development to occur in the places, and be of the type,
envisioned by the community. By making a conscious decision to accept more
congestion in District Centers, for example, a community can reduce the difficulty that a
prospective project faces in meeting concurrency requirements in that location. The
reduced project costs and streamlined permitting that results can be a strong incentive
in attracting development to that desired Center location.
An incentive-based use of Level of Service Standards for streets is discussed in detail in
the Transportation Element. It is important to establish here that this incentive
approach will be considered and implemented for other types of capital facilities, as
well, in the future. This approach may be appropriate for parks, for example. Decisions
about appropriate uses of variable LOS Standards as development incentives will be
made as parks plans, water plans, and other service plans are updated and/or
developed by the City.
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan CS 22
City Services Element
Exhibit C.2
Table CFP-1
T es and Providers of Ca ital Facdities
Faalit T e Provider Descn tion A licable Plan s
Fire and City of Provides facilities that support the
Emergency Bremerton provision of fire and emergency services.
Services F�re Dept.
Law City of Provides facdities that support the
Enforcement Bremerton provision of law enforcement services
Police Dept
Parks City of Provides facilities for passive and active • Land Use Element
Bremerton recreational activities •
Parks &
Recreation • 2007 Parks, Recreation
Dept. & Open Space Plan
Streets City of Provides streets, sidewalks, traffic • Transportation Element
Bremerton controls, and street lighting. • Six-Year Transportation
Dept. of Public Improvement Program
Works & (TIP)
Uttlities
Sanitary Sewer Bremerton P�ovides facilities used m coflection, • Utilities Element
Municipal transmission, storage, treatment or . n..,�« , oo� ���..�+�,.,.,+,,.
Wastewater discharge of waterborne waste within most
Utdity developed portions of city and some • 2005 Wastewater
surrounding unincorporated areas. Comprehensive Plan
U date
Schools Bremerton Provides elementary and secondary • Bremerton School
School District facilities for instruction in the several District Capital Faalities
branches of learning and study required by Plan: In Support of the
the Basic Education Code of the State of School Impact Fee
Washington Program, July 1992
• Mappmg the Bremerton
School's Future
2006/2007
Storm Water Bremerton Provides facdities that collect and transport • Ord. 4454
Management Municipal stormwater runoff. • 2008 Stormwater
Stormwater Management Plan
Utdity Update
Water Bremerton Provides supply of potable water from • 2005 Water System
Municipal system of surface water and welis. Comprehensive Plan
Water Utility Service area includes developed portions
of city and surrounding urnncorporated
areas. Utdity also contracts to provide
water to additional areas (Tracyton, Rocky
Pomt, PSNS, and Port of Bremerton airport
and industrial park
Citii of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 3
Exhibit C.2
Parks
Bremertori s park system contains 319 acres distributed over 32 park sites. Types of parks range
from pocket parks which may consist of a fraction of an acre to regional parks such as
Pendergast with 50 acres. For the purpose of park and open space planning the 360 acre Gold
Mountain Golf Complex is not included in the park inventory.
The city park system is managed by the Department of Parks and Recreation with citizen input
formalized through the Bremerton Parks and Recreation Commission.
The Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP) consists of a series of acquisition, development
and renovation projects identified during the extensive public process held to develop the Parks,
Recreation and Open Space Plan adopted in December of 2007.
• I ,
, .
,,,��.... ,. „},. ,.c .,ii i.,...,a . ,;,.i.:� �t.,, : .,�,,,a ,.:}., t:...,:,...
1.��.. �y���.�� ��� ��«. .
=�'��s�a��s ea���a� €ae�}���es-�eg��� ��a��s �t�e�t seee���-������tg-e#�e�s. '�ke�Ug��
�
:..�
Inventory of Park Lands
There are eight park, recreation and greenspace facilities types used by the City of Bremerton:
• Pocket parks
• Neighborhood parks
• Community parks
• Regional parks
• Greenspaces
• Natural areas
• Trails
• Special facilities
Pocket Parks
Pocket parks (or Mini parks) are generally smaller than one-half acre in size and may provide a
specific, local need such as a neighborhood tot lot, viewpoint or urban plaza; however, they are
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan -
City Service Appendix CS Appendix -17
Exhibit C.2
not an adequate substitute for a neighborhood park. These open spaces typically provide a
more passive user experience and can include elements such as picnic and sitting areas. Due to
their small size, pocket parks are not intended to serve or provide site amenities that would
draw from a wider community area. These parks are intended to serve their immediate
residential area, generally within �/a-mile of the site. Pocket parks may be considered as a
surrogate neighborhood park only when providing a larger, traditional neighborhood is
impractical or unachievable. Parking is generally not recommended or necessary.
POCKET PARKS
Arvon Park 0 02
East 9th St. Mini Park 0.03
Lower Roto �sta Park 0.5
McKenzie Basketball Court 0.02
Pat Carey �sta 0.5
Roto �sta Park 0 7
Whitey Oomstad 0 2
Wycoff Memorial Park 0.02
SUBTOTAL 1.99
Neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood parks are generally no more than 10 acres in size, depending on a variety of
factors including need, location and opportunity, and should meet a minimum size of 1.5 acres
in size when possible. These parks are intended to serve residential areas within walking
distance (up to ih-mile radius) of the park site and should be geographically distributed
throughout the community. Access is mostly pedestrian, and park sites should be located so
that persons living within the service area will not have to cross a major arterial street to get to
the site. Developed neighborhood parks typically include amenities such as pedestrian paths
and trails, picnic tables, play equipment, play fields, sports courts, landscaping and irrigation.
While no service standard previously existed for neighborhood parks, this Plan proposes a
combined acreage standard for developed neighborhood and community parks to emphasize
their importance within Bremerton's system. The proposed standard is 5.5 acres per 1,000
residents.
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix -18
Exhibit C.2
NEIGHBORHOOD PAIZKS
Bachmann Park 0.5
Bataan Park 1.0
Biueberry Park 6.9
Forest Ridge Park 27.3
Haddon Park 3.7
Kiwanis Park 4.0
Lent Landing Park 1.5
Manette Pla�eld 2.6 +
Matan Park � 37 �
Smrth Pla�eld 2.4 �
WaRen Ave. Playfield 3.0
SUBTOTAL 53.3
Community Parks
Community parks are generally 10 to 50 acres in size and are best defined by the array of
recreational activities that a site provides. Community parks may include areas suited for
intense recreational facilities, such as athletic complexes and skate parks, along with passive
areas for walking, wildlife observation and picnicking. These parks serve groups of
neighborhoods within a 1-mile radius of the park site. Access to community parks may be by
car, bicycle or on foot. In general, community park facilities are designed for organized
activities and sports, although passive components such as trails and picnic areas are highly
recommended as complements to active sports facilities.
The range of facilities provided will be greater than in neighborhood parks and will generally
appeal to more diverse user groups. Developed community parks typically include amenities
such as picnic shelters and tables, tennis courts, covered activity areas, soccer and baseball
fields, bike and pedestrian trails, restrooms, landscaping, irrigation and parking lots.
Community parks may also incorporate community facilities, such as community centers,
senior centers or aquatic facilities.
CitU of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix -19
Exhibit C.2
COMMUNITY PARKS
East Park 17.5
Evergreen Park 10.0
Kitsap Lake Park 2 0
Lions Park 15.0
N.A.O. Marine Park 27.5
N.A D. Park 54.0
Shendan Park 3.0
SUBTOTAL 129.0
Regional Parks
Regional parks are usually larger than 50 acres in size and serve residents from throughout
Kitsap County and beyond. No service standard exists for regional parks in Bremerton. These
parks are usually designed to accommodate large numbers of people, and typically, they
provide for diverse and intensive recreational activities, such as sports complexes, extensive
trail systems or large picnic areas. Regional parks often include passive or natural areas and
unique features. Pendergast Park is the city's largest regional park. The other two of
Bremertori s regional parks focus on the downtown waterfront: Harborside Park and the Louis
Mentor Boardwalk. While these sites are not of the size typical to a regional park, they do draw
users from a very wide area. Additionally, as the Boardwalk expands to Evergreen Park, it will
solidify the regional nature of the amenity and provide a significant visitor attraction to
Bremertori s downtown core.
REGIONAL PARKS
Harborside Fountain Park 2.5 �
;
Louis Mentor Boardwalk 2.0 �
Pendergast Reg�onal Park 50.0 ;
SUBTOTAL 54.5 �
Greenspaces and Open Space Corridors
Greenspaces and open space corridors provide visual and psychological relief hom man-made
development within the urban area. Open space corridors are typically long, relatively narrow
lands that follow roads, creeks, and other natural or transportation corridors. These corridors
may protect environmentally-sensitive areas and provide wildlife habitat. Greenspaces and
open space corridors are acquired with the intent of limited or no development and may offer
limited accessibility or public recreation utility, such as a wetland property.
CihLof Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 20
Exhibit C.2
GREENSPACES
Bremerton Gateway R.O W. 7.0
SUBTOTAL 7.0
Natural Areas
Natural areas provide amenities for passive recreation, such as trails, benches and
environmental interpretive panels. Public access via rustic trails within these areas is important
to provide passive recreational opportunities, as appropriate with resource protection and
environmental regulations. The selection of natural area sites is based on a variety of criteria,
including linkage to or through other open spaces, public facilities, relation to existing parks in
the area, the need to preserve a site's natural features, and the size and quality of the open
space. The primary difference between a site classified as "natural area' and a"greenspace" is
that the natural area is intended to remain in a natural state, while also providing passive
recreation opportunities, and is acquired or being retained as a site of unique environmental
quality (i.e., extensive wooded hillside or ravine).
NATURAL AREAS
EastPark Nature Area 15.5
Kitsap Lake Park (wetlands) 30 0
Stephenson Canyon 28 0
SUBTOTAI 73.5
Trails
Hiking, walking and cycling trails are in strong demand by residents of Bremerton. A trail may
exist within a publicly acquired open space corridor or right-of-way or along railroad lines or
utility corridors defined by drainage areas, topographical changes, wooded areas or vegetation
patterns that can link schools, libraries or commercial areas with parks. The trail should be
sufficiently wide enough to accommodate the intended type of trail user(s), preserve the
features through which the trail is traveling and buffer adjacent land use activities.
Trails may be developed in conjunction with various recreational activities, such as jogging,
nature study and historic observation. They may be a separate facility, such as a fitness trail, or
a connected element of a larger facility, such as a greenway trail. Surfaces will vary with
location and use. Provisions for parking, consistent signage and interpretive markers may also
be included in trail development.
Cih� of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 21
Exhibit C.2
In order to provide an appealing, safe, accessible, economical and diverse trail system, trail
standards and classifications should be developed and may be based on the following:
Regional Trail: Paved, shared-use, long-distance linear trail corridors for the exclusive use
of pedestrians, bicycles and other approved trail users. Regional trails are typically 12'-
14' wide with a 2' wide gravel shoulder on both sides. An example of a regional trail
would be proposed expansion of the Bremerton Boardwalk.
Community Trail: Paved, shared-use trails typically found within community parks or
linking park facilities. Community trails are typically 8'-10' wide. The paths within
Evergreen Park are examples of community trails.
Rustic Trail: Earthen or soft-surface trails with limited horizontal clearances and
challenging grades and obstacles. Providing accessibility and regular facility
maintenance are issues typical of this type of trail. Rustic trails vary in width and
surfacing. T'he trails of the East Park Nature Area are rustic trails.
Water Trail: Navigable non-motorized and motorized waterways appropriate for canoe,
kayak, and other boating. Providing launch facilities and non-motorized boat access
points are important considerations in water trails.
Bike Routes and Sidewalks: Typically associated with the transportation system, these
linear paths are heavily used within urban areas and should be included in trail
planning efforts. (See Non-Motorized Transportation Plan for additional information.)
Special Facilities
Special facilities include single-purpose recreational areas such as golf courses, conservatories,
arboreta, display gardens and outdoor theaters. Special facilities also include community
centers and pools, areas sites of historical or cultural significance, like museums, historical
landmarks and structures, and public plazas in or near commercial centers, public buildings or
other urban developed areas. There are no standards concerning the development of special
facilities - demand being defined by opportunity more than a ratio standard. Nor are there
minimum or maximum facility or site sizes - size being a function of the facility rather than a
separately established design standard.
Special facilities within Bremerton include the Gold Mountain Golf Course, Ivy Green
Cemetery, Bremerton SkatePark and the facilities of the Bremerton Senior Center, Sheridan
Community Recreation Center and Glenn Jarstad Aquatic Center.
, .
�Es
CitU of Bremerton Comprehensive Plnn
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 22
Exhibit C.2
, .
. �
�
Fvi..v. �i.nn 4�-...v. .. � 1-!. ..,. i. �l...v. '7'� ..
. '
/ •
/ / /
1
���eve�e�ed-�e�es�e��ed—{�th�e�4-�} ,
T.. h'1"��Tt'
� R3F�E-P�9 A�F@SS �VQ{A�EE� �81f@�ANC� �B�I
�� �� A6F@S
�
� ,
4
� ,
a-5
�
a-e
�s
�
� . .
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 23
Exhibit C.2
� . .
� .
� .
� .
�3 . .
� .
5 . . .
� .
� . .
� . .
3a . .
��f`�i 9i�c'k�—��,�Y'-IES
� i i � i
�
i
n u
i
T•+h- rcrviv ° �ai
AAa�-# Aa�-Na�e A�ess Be�re� ��eueFe�e� �e�a1
{As�e� EAs�esy As�es
� �
�
City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 24
Exhibit C.2
a-a .
� .
�e
� .
8 e�leaes
�4 .
� . .
. Cit�of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 25
Exhibit C.2
Ape�-�e
. ,
� • ,
, ,
, , , .
�a�le-Pk4-3
AAa�-# Ra�k-Pla�e A�ess c ''"�' "•^�'^�i
� - - .
� - - .
34 - .
n,.i..... c..,.:�:�.:,.�
. /
T.. MTQR�r{.Tr�ebv
"'.�'. '• �Q�F�o�e rqptO.T� � �Q�{Q�C�f y'VCQf
� � ' `�•....
� ,
'1'�U
t� . .
�t
. �
.,}„i�, Q .. ,,,. .. �a„t,,,i,,..,,a i�„4 :�„i..a;�,. � ,.,,� irr„t,i,. nr� n�
: j, j,:� :::::.t�.,. ., r : ��: �.� .A�., .,.�.��..�
�dble-Pa4-4
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 26
Exhibit C.2
� �� �� �� ��
0
0
0
0
0
0
�^M^^��' ^� Future Demand for Parks �ee�s and Open Space
Bremertori s park and open space land base has remained relatively static over the past 30 years
with the exception of several prominent, but relatively small (in terms of acres) additions. These
additions include 2.5 acre Harborside Park and a 1.7 acre expansion of Evergreen Park.
Currently Bremerton has 8.9 acres of Parks and Open Space per 1,000 residents. The standard
set forth by the National Recreation and Parks Association is 15 to 24 acres of park land per
1,000 residents. The city's goal of providing 5.5 acres of actively developed park land per 1,000
residents is 117 acres short of being met. The 2007 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space Plan
establishes a policy to provide a neighborhood park within one half mile of every residence
and a community park within a one mile radius of each dwelling. In some parts of town smaller
pocket parks lacking the variety of facilities or land mass of a true neighborhood park currently
substitute for the neighborhood park envisioned in the Plan. To meet the service radius policy
the city could expand undersized neighborhood parks through acquisition of adjacent
properties and/or acquire strategically located vacant parcels for developing new
neighborhood/community parks.
DESIRED STANDARDS
Desired Service Standard 5.5 acres/1000 of developed parkland
Desired Distribution Standard 1 mde radius for Community Parks
1/2 mile radius for Neighborhood Parks
Desi�ed Minimum Size 10 acres for Community Parks
1.5 acres for Neighborhood Parks
The 5.5 acres of developed neighborhood and community park land per 1000 residents is
established as a standard independent of school athletic fields and sports courts. School
facilities augment community and neighborhood parks, however their presence does not affect
the applicability of the standard for the following reasons.l) School grounds are not available
Cthl o{Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 27
Exhibit C.2
to the public during school hours. 2) School related athletic teams and events have priority on
these facilities and may be closed to public use to protect turf for varsity events. 3) School
grounds often dori t provide the level of grading, landscaping and amenities that combine to
create a respite from the urban, built environment.
Throughout the process of developing the 2007 Plan the concept of connecting city parks to one
another through a network of trails, enhanced bike lanes and greenbelts was frequently
mentioned by citizens. While progress has been made on providing linkages through the
formalization of the Stephenson Canyon Greenway and the planned Boardwalk connecting
downtown parks with Evergreen Park, there is considerable local demand for providing
connectivity.
By 2023 the city's population is expected to exceed 50,000. If no additional park acquisitions are
made over the course of the next 13 years, the current deficit of developed park acreage per
1,000 residents will increase from 117 acres to 200 acres.
�
, ,
��te-C���as ��-���e�es e��a��C �a��s-�e� �,9A9�ee . 'T''�;� : � �' ' �� ; T'.'��a�
•/ ,
T �, ...1 .,L C.,«..;,.,, !T (lCl
r r
i i i •
i •
. /
. �
i
i i
�2Sk�2S:
.
r i i
R«.,.V..,..�.,„�� .,.a� .,.,a ,�1�,�;,..,�
i .
�r.,,.:,...,.,t c�....a..,.a� �„� c,,,.,-t, �.., �rnn n,. „ �� �n .. .. � nnn ,. ,. c,... i,.,..,i .,,.a ,. ..i
7 �
��
Cit�of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 28
Exhibit C.2
. ,
,
, .
. , .
... , .
�te-t�-�
�e As�es ��•°�,�AS ,
. a-4�asFes
�4-64asfes
. ' '�;-��
_ �-�3as�es
�RME-6
�� c..,��� �.,:��w ,
a-4�as�es
�64�asFes
� , �.,,..,,�
. ��
rrt,,, ... ,,,-.,.,,a ... .,i.,,.;�., ,,., .,��, � .:,-t,:� ,-�,,, r•;�., ;� G�,. � �z nnn � ,..t„ t�.., . �m�z F
..... t .,�����«.. r �Y���« . �
�.,.�..i ... ,.i.,,-:�� �c �n � c� �.,,.,,a ,... ,-t,,, ,. �� ,.:�., t:..,:��
��.�...� t ,: t..A��« � , ,
n�,....,...,.a �;i.., n....�, �..,.:iu:,.,.
Thr�P�rlc�-,,,a n„ .,�:,. �nm �nm r�,-„ �,. „i.,, ni ,- � ,-t�.,�. �r nc ,. • ,.t�
- cPr �7CRLLSCi'[LTC"'aQ�tCq�T�[YI
/ /
.,,.�:.,;�;,,� .,�1.1„�:,, F;.,1.-1.. .,.,,a ,. .,1 , „ L.,,,:1;+;.,�
....«.��...�� �««�. ,
r
i r •
fnrru��^� • •11 + ,-1,-1;�-' t '� •,-� .a F
.. ., t. �t, k... ..,.. �. «� ._ u"�virrciC-ee ectiiracccrrcivrreercr��-rvrcrczzccca-rvr.
CitU of Bremerton Comprehenstve Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 29
Exhibit C.2
. ri,:,,,� „c ,a„�,,,,,,.,,,a �..,..,,-: � „ �,..,;,
� 1 ..�«
� � .,,a,a;�.:,..,..1 � .. C:,,l,a�
i i
E.'3 .
Six-Year Funding and Proj ects
The following Capital Improvement Program (CIP) lists the park and recreation facility projects
considered for the next 6 years. The 20071ong-range Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
contains a more comprehensive list of identified park improvements and acquisitions (pages 93-
98), covering a 20 year horizon. Funding opportunities for these projects shall be provided
through available grant opportunities, real estate excise tax and park revenues.
,
T.. L.- rvvr'�a—� �`�-�r
Citu of Bremerton Com�rehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 30
� Exhibit C.2
�`���
� ��
�
Project 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Anderson Cove Waterfront Ac wsition - 500,000
Communi S orts Field Im rovements 100,000 100,000
Irri ation Lines to Street Trees and Flower Baskets 100,000
Jarstad Aquatic Center- Filtration/Chemical Feed System
Up rades - 325,000
Jarstad Aquatic Center- Natatorium Li htin Im rovements 40,000
Kiwanis Park Redevelopment 200,000 305,000
Lions Park - Dock & Boat Launch Plannin Surve 75,000
Lions Park Renovation 1,700,000 50,000
Maintenance Facili Relocation - 373,900
Mataan Park Im rovements 130,000 495,000 -
Off-Leash Do Park Pro'ect 25,000
Pendergast Re ional Park- Softball Field Development 320,000
Pender ast Re�ionai Park- Softball Field Renovation - 195,000
Pla round E ui ment Replacement - 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000
Riddell Area Nei hborhood Park Acquisition 450,000
Shendan Park Redevelo ment - 400,000
Tennis Court Resurfacing - 40,000
Vehicle Equipment Additions - 75,000
Warren Avenue Pla ield Renovation 450,000
Total 2,130,000 1,408,900 130,000 1,970,000 30,000 930,000
• City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 31
Exhibit C.2
Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary sewer facilities are provided by the Bremerton Department of Public Works and
Utilities. A complete inventory, analysis of need, and capital improvements program are
provided in the T����m'��r ''nn'� August 2005 Wastewater Comprehensive Plan. The 200�5 Plan
uses a 20-year planning horizon with intermediate planning timeframes of 5 and 9-years (i.e.,
2010, 2014, and 2024.)
�4. It therefore provides an analysis that satisfies the City 2003-2004 Comprehensive Plan
Update's six year concurrency requirement.
Service Area
The Wastewater Comprehensive Plan identifies existing and future service areas served by the
Wastewater Utility. The Wastewater Plan estimates the population of the service area at n��
44,330, of which 37,260 �48 are within the city limits and 7,070 outside the city. The plan
estimates that approximately 36,120 �?AA� persons are connected to the sewer system, leaving
an unsewered population of 8,210.
The service area covers 1�5 drainage basins, of which four extend beyond the city limits into
unincorporated county areas: Tracyton Beach, Trenton Avenue, Sinclair Park, and Oyster Bay.
The Utility provides sewage treatment to the sewered areas in the service area through direct
service and through specific contractual agreements with the U.S. Navy and Kitsap County
Sewer District No. 1(Navy Yard City). (Figure 2-2 "Service Area")
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The City sewerage system consists of sewage collection, transmission, treatment, and bio-solids
reuse facilities. Included are more than 188 miles of gravity sewers, approximately 16 miles of
pressure lines, and 3�7 pump stations. These facilities convey combined sewage to a secondary
wastewater treatment plant located just south of West Hills. Additionally there are 1b3
combined sewer overflow (CSO) sites located within the sewer collection system.
Approximately 60 percent of the system is composed of combined sanitary system. (Table SS-1)
Table SS-1
Inventory: Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Treatment Plant Address ANere�e-Baiy�
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 32
Exhibit C.2
Capacity
Westside BFer�e�#e�► Wastewater Treatment Plant 1600 Oyster Bay Ave W 32mgd-(3�-�A:�
(>) �
Eastside CSO Treatment Plant (1) 2475 Stephenson Avenue 20 mgd
(throughput)
Forest Enhancement Sites One & Two (2J Near Gold Mtn. Golf Course 300 acres
(1J City of Bremerton Final Br� Wastewater Comprehensive P/an, A�'E99�.
(Z) City of Bremerton Annual �993 Biosolids Report to Breme�ton-Kitsap County Health District
Wastewater Treatment Plant
The existing Westside Wastewater Treatment Plant is permitted for a
peak hydraulic capacity of 32.0 �9-5 million gallons per day (mgd). Normal dry weather peak
flow capacity without stormwater inflow is permitted for 7.6 ^�' �` 4 mgd. Current
annual average and maximum monthly flows to the wastewater treatment plant are about 60
percent of the average annual and maximum monthly flows for which it is permitted �as
desig�e�. Since 1993, the City has implemented a Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) reduction
plan to reduce CSO's to less than one per site annually. This was achieved primarily through
infrastructure improvements that maximized flow to the Westside WWTP. In 2001, the City
constructed the Eastside Treatment Plant at the site of overflow OF-1. Peak combined sewer
flows are directed to this treatment during storms when system flows exceed the capacity to the
Westside Secondary WWTP. This treatment plant uses ballasted sedimentation, high rate
clarification followed by UV disinfection. This plant has a capacity of 20 mgd. c'�rm•. -.,;"
• ,
� n.,;., :.,a..,,,,a a„t., �..,� ,.,,a,,,.,,a +�,,, ., ,,,- „c �.,.,��,,..,.,�-,,,, +,.,,,+�a �,., �n � n+_
. • . ,
. . ,
/T,.L.�C, C�71
Table SS-2
Bremerton Wastewater Treatment System Service Area Capacity
Measure Capaciiy �AA3 2004 Demand 4994 2005
Surplus/Deficit
Population 76,000�8 36,12^'.,�0 39,880353A9
Connections '33,043 �� 15,704-9�4� 17,339�-4,�6
Sources: F+pa�B�fi�Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, 200 . �
Cit�o{Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 33
Exhibit C.2
���
� * Connections = Population capacity / 2.430 average persons per household size (A change in average
household size would change the number of possible connections )
Forest Enhancement Program -- Biosolids Utilization
The wastewater treatment plant produces approximately 5.8 million gallons of anaerobically
digested biosolids each year. Because biosolids have fertilizer and soil amendment value the
City began an active land application (silviculture) program several years ago to utilize the
benefits of this wastewater process. Biosolids are used to enhance tree growth and are currently
applied to 300 acres of Utility-owned forest land. Since June 1992,100 percent of the biosolids
produced at the treatment plant have been utilized in this beneficial manner.
Future Needs
Existing Demand
There are approximately 15,704 �4� existing connections, including several connections at the
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS), serving approximately 36,120 �5A8 people in the service
area. The annual average daily flow is 4.0 �8 mgd.
Level of Service (LOS)
The capacity of existing sewer facilities to serve future needs is determined by comparing the
gallons of effluent per day now approved by the State, the number of existing connections, and
the number of new people to be served. The number of new people is converted into the
number of new residential connections based on assumptions of the number of persons per
household, and the number of gallons of effluent generated per capita per day (gpcd). The
capacity can also be estimated based on an existing and planned LOS for sewer service.
The calculation of the current LOS excludes stormwater inflow. The proposed LOS is the
existing county-wide average.
• Current LOS = 9�8 gallons per capita per day
• Proposed LOS =100
Future Demand
City and County estimates of future demand differ. (Tables SS-3 £� SS-4)
Ctty o{Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 34
Exhibit C.2
��� �,
• � „ �, �� �
. .. �
�e{t�t#��e�eFas�s���4�e���Ee-a�e,�P�t�e�o� ��nQ „ ,.� ���o��z
F aa; ,��i a n�� ,-• t, �m n
�e�'S�e�S� e-Ce�t�#� p�rejee�s-�eed rvTi cviaccccivreso��cui�._�zr
�
City Estimate: The City's Wastewater Comprehensive Plan estimates the 20043 service
area population at 44,330 �99, of which 1b9% are outside the city limits. All but 8,210
persons are connected to the sewer system. Assuming 100% of this unsewered
population will connect to the system within the next 20 years, there is a remaining
capacity to serve an additiona113,000 persons.
The City estimates that the actua12014 service area population will be 45,198 �5-a88 (rather than
81,408 as forecasted by the County).
� � Table SS-3 ; � � � �
-, Comparison ,of City/County Estimates of Sanitary Sewer Service Area Population
.�"Source of Estimate �994 2000 Population 2014 Population 4994 2000-2014 Increase
• County 68,425 �� 81,408 12,983 �-9�3
City 37,259 �.?5A8 45,198 �5 7,939-�-A69
Difference = 31,11�'.,�� 36,210 4� 5,044 TC�T.TJ
Sources� City of Bremerton F+�a�Bfa#-Wastewater Comprehensive P/an, A�99� 2005.
, o
The City projects a year 2014 �� surplus capacity of 30,802 -�'� (compared with the
County projection of a deficit capacity of 5,408�). Tnble SS-4)
' ° , Table SS-4 ` �
� Comparison of City/County Estimates of Wastewater Treatment Plant Demand (Population) .
• C�ttLof Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 35
Exhibit C.2
Source of Current-�994 �99 2004 �AAA-Be�er�d 2014 Demand Total Deficit or
Estimate Capaciiy Demand Surplus
County (�} 76,000-5�'� 68,425 3�668 -68 81,408 -5,408A�
City {� 76,000 �AA9 36,120 37 �� 45,198 +30,802 �
��
Difference = --�4�9 32,305 8 -�8 36,210 36,210 G,�
��
Sources: City of Bremerton �WastewaterComp�ehensive Plan, ^.���:�"^'_ 2005
Note: The discrepancy between the City and County estimates is due to the calculation methods utilized between
each entity. Kitsap County generated their caculations from 1990 Transportation Area Zones (TAZ) data to define the
City� s service area, these areas go beyond Bremerton� s wastewater service areas. The City of Bremerton utdizes
current customer billing data and adopted service areas for estimates of future need.
o ,
Tl-..,�„ „��-;..�.,�.,� ,.F � .��-�„�, ,. ,.;+<. ,-1;CC.,« G,,« � ,...1 «
.,�.,.,,. �< .,,...
------ ---°°--°--- -° -- ° -° -� ---°° - -°-°-� --°°°-° °-° -- ° -°-°° °--°--°-_.
. /
i
. �
�� u i
t.l. .. !] „ '
i i i
0
i •
Household Size — The average household size is used to calculate the number of
connections to the system. The County estimate assumes an average household size of
2.65 persons per household (pph), the 1990 county-wide average. The City estimate
assumes 2.430 pph, the �99 2004 service area household size as calculated in the City's
Wastewater Plan.
Cit;u of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 36
Exhibit C.2
'�e�t�xe�tt-�'�t-��� Ea$ac��-(�e�t��a��e�
,
, •
---------- = --- --,-=-, ---- =-� ------= --- -- -- -- =— o �
2014 Demand
• , , ,
. Refer to table -2 in the City's WW Comprehensive Plan.
Six-year Forecast
o �
' ' ' . . �
. Refer to table -2 in the City's WW Comprehensive
Plan.
�a�le-SS-�
�� �Y ��Y
f�) �R�
s�ss
six�feaFPJeed
3�8A8 �899 3-�A-AAG9
',� � 8:�-+�68
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plnn
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 37
Exhibit C.2
�� � a-�-�se
��3 � _ ��r�va
�'
�WBR�h�$aF
o �� �i �
�-�9� -a-4- a--a-�-RAE7B
�� �� c n�vn
��'
T..}..1 �fIAA 7A� A I..�rr....... - ��'IT T7Ri TT7II
0
Need for Capital Facility Improvements for Capacity
The Wastewater Plant has the capacity to serve a population of 76,000, which is greater than the
projected 2014 population of 45,198.
, . , ,
nt..«� ,.c nat�,,,. n,.,,�,:a,.«�
'r�.,, r�;,.�.,.. r n„�.i;,. �n�,.,.i.� r�,,,...,«�-,.,,,.,� �n�.,�}„�.,.,�„« r�:.,;�;,,., :„�t,,, .�, „C
�.... �_.��u �.�,.�r«��
�
�.,,.:i;�;,,,. �,. ,. ,,,..,.,,a .. ,,,a�
--�------- -- --- - = r='�;------ ----_.,.
Proposed Facilities
The Wastewater Plan recommends four types of improvements at the treatment plant to
accommodate projected sewage flows at ultimate plan service area development and to solve
some current and anticipated operational problems:
• Infrastructure improvements -- repairs or replacements of existing sewer system facilities
to restore structural integrity;
• Regulatory requirements -- improvements needed as a result of new or modified codes,
guidelines, or laws initiated from federal, state, and local government;
• Growth and system extensions -- improvements resulting from new development or
system extensions;
• Other system improvements -- recommendations that contribute to the improved
operation or function of the system but are not a result of infrastructure needs,
regulations, or system growth.
CitU of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 38
Exhibit C.2
Six-Year Financial Plan
It is estimated that the existing sanitary sewer system has 8 million gallons per day (mgd)
available capacity, which is sufficient to meet the total need of 5.23 mgd through the next six
years. (This assumes removal of stormwater from the system over the next several years under
the City's CSO Reduction Plan.)
CittLof Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 39
Exhibit C.2
�e-ss-�
�ea�P�e�ee�s Faei�i�e►�{y Net�Fesew�e�
Req�iFe�AS Availeble Bef�eieRey
�994 �-�-�SB �B ' ��,�
� nn�n �B
�B �g ��
�+
*k
**1t
*
**
t<*
Operating Costs
It may be useful to consider the impact of each completed capital improvement on the City's
future operating budget. An analysis of operating costs is optional; it is not required by the
Growth Management Act.
Proiect 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Graviry Sewers 7,650,000 1,725,000 725,000 2,325,000 5,350,000 600,000
Forcemains 200,000 475,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 0 0
Beach Sewers 155,000 1,255,000 1,200,000 200,000 0 25,000
Low Pressure Sewers 250,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 0 0
Inverted Siphons 0 0 0 75,000 400,000 0
Pump Stations 500,000 725,000 710,000 650,000 875,000 875,000
Treatment 40,000 150,000 125,000 125,000 407,000 830,000
Re-use 10,000 0 0 250,000 0 0
Outfalls 0 100,000 450,000 0 250,000 2,500,000
ULID's 0 0 200,000 4,440,000 13,847,000 5,000,000
Buddmgs 30,000 0 0 0 50,000 0
Land 0 0 0 50,000 0 500,000
Comprehensive Plan 0 250,000 0 0 0 0
Eqwpment 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
TOTAL EXPENSE 8,855,000 6,200,000 7,180,000 10,385,000 21,199,000 10,350,000
CitU of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 40
Exhibit C.2
Water
The City of Bremerton Water Utility (Water Utility) provides potable water within the City and
the surrounding area. A complete inventory, analysis of need, and capital facilities program is
provided in the adopted�9�-� 2005 City of Bremerton Water System Plan Update. �^"��'^ }'�^' °°�
�The water demand projections are for the period 2005
through 2024. Consistency statements were received by both the City of Bremerton and Kitsap
County, and therefore the data can be used to address the concurrency requirement.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
Service Area
The Water Utility serves a population of approximately 56,000 in Bremerton (80% of the water
use) and portions of Kitsap County (20% of the water use). This use includes the City's West
517 Zone system (considered a separate system by the Washington State Department of Health
(DOH)) and contracts to supply water to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) and to the
City of Port Orchard. The Water Utility also is under contract to provide water and operation
and maintenance to the ���and Rocky Point Water Districts. The current service area
includes approximately 13,800 acres.
The Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan also documents water service areas and system
responsibilities within those service areas.
Capacity and Water Rights �
The Water Utility supply consists of the Union River Reservoir behind Casad Dam and 1�3
active production wells. Approximately Er50 percent of the supply comes from the 2,964-acre
Union River watershed, which is 98 percent owned and controlled by the Bremerton Water
Utility. Wells in multiple aquifers supply groundwater to the system. Current average daily
demand is approximately 8 million gallons per day (MGD).
The current capacity of the water system is 1�6.9 MGD for an average day demand and 2�9.5
MGD for a maximum day demand. The Union River supply has such exceptional water
quality, it is one of the few surface water systems in the country to be allowed to operate
unfiltered by DOH. This does mean, however, that during unusual events such as when high
winter rains increase the turbidity (a measure of water clarity) or during a drought, surface
supplies may not always be fully available. During these times the City must depend on well
supplies to meet demands. The firm yield from the Union river is 5.6 MGD.
All water in use by the City has been properly appropriated through certificates of water rights
or registered claims. The agency with regulatory oversight of water rights is the Washington
Department of Ecology (Ecology). Bremerton's groundwater rights consist of 12,�8g631 acre-
feet/year (ac-ft/yr) annual quantity of primary rights,1,408 ac-ft/yr annual quantity of
supplemental rights, �8,675 gallons per minute (gpm) instantaneous rights, and 880 gpm
Cih� of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 58
Exhibit C.2
supplemental rights. Bremertori s surface water rights consist of 40 cubic feet per second (cfs)
instantaneous rights from the Union River. Historically-used surface water claims of 5,000 ac-
ft/yr from Gorst Creek and 3,000 ac-ft/yr from Anderson Creek are maintained for emergency
use and potential future use pending required treatment.
Water Quality
The Water Utility provides high quality water which is verified by an extensive monitoring
program that goes beyond minimal requirements. The regulatory agencies that provide
oversight for drinking water quality are US EPA and DOH. The Water Utility meets all the
protective standards set by the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and state laws and regulations.
The Water Utility practices a multiple-barrier approach to protecting water quality from the
source to through the distribution system. Bremerton's Union River surface source is of such
excellent quality that it is currently approved to remain unfiltered. Groundwater sources are
safeguarded by a Wellhead Protection Program. All sources are disinfected with chlorine and
chlorine residual is maintained throughout the system. In 1999, the corrosion control facility
was completed to adjust the pH of the water to prevent corrosion of internal plumbing.
Underway is the construction of an advanced disinfection facility which will provide ultraviolet
light disinfection to comply with federal drinking water regulations. This treatment is
anticipated to be on line by the end of 2010.
An annual water quality report is provided to all customers and is available on the City's web
site.
Facilities
A summary of the Bremerton water system is provided in Table 1.
Table 1
Bremerton Water S stem Summa
Sources currentl in use Union River and 1�3 roduction wells
5-Year avera e da demand .�33 Mdlion Gailons er Da
E uivalent Residential Unit 200 allons er da er sin le famil residence
Number of Connections 16,A�2361
Po ulation served 56,000
Mdes of Pi e 291 mdes
Number of Reservoirs 3 raw water, 17 treated water
Number of Pum Stations 10
Number of Pressure Booster Stations 6
Number of Pressure Reducin Stations 14
Number of Pressure Relief Valves 7 includes 2 sur e antici ators
Service Area 13,800 Acres not includin the watershed
Pressure Zones 256, W440, W517, W580, W650, E240, E398, E490
Disinfection Chlonne and UV antici ated b 2010
Treatment H ad'ustment for corrosion control
There are se�e� eight pressure zones in the system designated by the overflow elevations in
Utility reservoirs. The water system control and alarm is provided through a telemetry system.
Cit�o{Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 59
Exhibit C.2
Operations staff are certified and the system is operated in compliance with all federal and state
regulations.
Fire Flows
A major function of the water supply and distribution system is to meet fire flow demands. This
section summarizes the fire flow requirements applicable to the Bremerton water system, which
serves areas both inside the city limits and in unincorporated Kitsap County. Bremerton serves
water to residential and commercial structures in three fire districts:
• City of Bremerton (within city limits)
• Central Kitsap Fire and Rescue (north of the city limits)
• South Kitsap Fire and Rescue District #7 (south of the city limits and Port of Bremerton)
The Bremerton Fire Department adopted by ordinance Appendices B and C of the International
Fire Code (IFC), listed in Table B105.1 in the IFC. The Kitsap County Fire Marshal's office
adopted a separate fire flow and hydrant placement, Ordinance 323(A)-2005, amending the IFC.
The fire flow requirement for specific projects is dependent on many factors, including the
following:
• Size of the structure(s)
• Location of the project
• Type of construction materials
• Number of stories
• Building fire protection systems (sprinklers, automatic fire doors, etc.)
• Proximity of adjacent structures
• Type of building occupancy (storage of flammable materials, etc.)
For purposes of this water system plan, minimum fire flows to be provided by the Bremerton
water system have been identified as:
Residential 1,000 gpm for 2 hours
Commercial 1,500 gpm for 2 hours
Fire flows required by the IFC are considered minimums for new construction. When evaluating
new construction, Bremerton Public Works and Utilities Department personnel shall determine
the ability of the water system to meet fire flow requirements at that location with a minimum of
20 psi residual pressure throughout the distribution system. If the water system cannot provide
the required fire flow for the specific project, the developer is required to revise building
construction and/or make the necessary improvements to the distribution system to meet the
project's fire flow requirements as established by the Fire Marshal.
Cit�of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 60
Exhibit C.2
The Washington Survey and Rating Bureau is a non-profit organization funded by subscribing
property insurance companies in accordance with the Washington State Insurance Code. They
are tasked with rating the fire fighting and protection abilities for municipalities. This rating is
then used by insurance companies for setting rates. The water system's capability is 39 percent
of the total rating score. Bremerton's last survey was completed in 1997, and the water system
ranked as Class II, an excellent rating.
The hydraulic analysis of fire flows for the Bremerton water system is discussed in Section 8,
fire flow and storage requirements. Bremerton analyzed storage capacity without nesting fire
suppression and emergency standby storage.
, ,
,
��„ �a �}.,�a�,� ,.�„ .,�.,, .,�, .,�•., :�.
��.,��b� �..� �..�.����r�r-
,
,
,
o . �
�-1.., . .,�-.,« � ,��,,... « ..1.,,,� .,� r'1.,�� TT „11,,.,� «..�-:.,.,.
,..... .....«.r ,s`� � ^
Forecast of Future Needs
Existing Demand
�'�� -. � .. a�;i., . ..,..... ., ,�,.,,,�, a,.....,„a :„ �nn� � � � r,r�n The 5-year average is 7.�33
� u��r . ,
MGD. Figure 1 shows the average day demand (ADD) and maximum day demand (MDD)
since 1994.
Cih/ of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 61
City of Bremerton
Water Production
�s.o ibit C.2
t50 149 State
16.0 �i2z a
141 139
C 14 0- ��13 4 6/19 ���g Drought 7/1g 8�6 Drought � 129
l�C� 12.3
�. %1 � 8/14 /i �7/14
0. �2.�
N
0 10.0
� 80
� � 8 � 8 8 � � �
6
v 6.0
� 40
2.0
0.0 -, � , � ,
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
O Average Day Demand ■ Maximum Day Demand
Figure 1 Source: Bremerton Public Works and Utilities Department
As shown in Figure 2, approximately 80% of the water demand is "in-City" demand, and 20%
outside the city limits. I'SNS is the largest single water user with an average day demand
between 2 - 3 MGD.
City of Bremerton
2008 Water Demands by Location
Av�erage Day Demand = 6.6 Million Gallons per Day
Navy
Properties
34% Within City
Limits
45%
Rocky Pt
Water
District Non-
0
2 ° revenue County
1% 17%
Figure 2 Source: Bremerton Public Works and Utilities Department
Average day demand is affected by the year's rain patterns and other factors. For example, 2007
& 2008 were mild summers �}9� �•��� ��••�} ���-M^��r, resulting in less outside water use. The
highest MDD ever recorded in Bremerton was 20 MGD during unusually low temperatures in
December 1990 when pipes broke and customers ran water to prevent pipes from freezing.
2001's drought affected Bremertori s surface supply and the Water Utility requested a voluntary
10% reduction in water use that summer. Customers responded with an 18% reduction in use
which averted a need for water restrictions.
Level of Service (LOS) Standard
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 62
Exhibit C.2
The estimated �� 2005 LOS is a daily average of 200 gallons per equivalent residential unit.
The Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) is the amount of water consumed by a typical full-time
single family residence. This value is calculated by dividing the amount of water used by single
family accounts that used water in all of the year's billing cycles by the total number of single
family accounts.
The value for an ERU is specific to a particular water system and reflects the characteristics of a
water system's customer base and weather patterns. ERUs are used by DOH to calculate a
water system's capacity. For example, if a system has been determined to have capacity to
serve 100 single family homes, it would be able to serve any combination of commercial,
industrial, or residential customers equivalent to the needs of 100 single family homes, that is,
100 ERUs. Currently Bremerton has the capacity to serve in excess of 50,000 ERUs. The Puget
Sound Naval Complex is equivalent to about 10,000 ERUs.
Bremertori s ERU value of approximately 200 gal/day/ERU is on the low side when compared
to other systems in Kitsap County and the state. Reasons for this include:
Smaller urban lot sizes common in the service area use less water for landscaping.
A high rental population - Bremerton is about 60% rental housing while the national average is
about 40%. Renters may tend to use less water, since they sometimes do not have dish or
clothes wahssers and usually do not use as much water maintaining landscapes. es�ee��
^..�
An effective conservation program. Bremerton has actively worked with customers on
conservation since 1992. �
An effective public awareness campaign during the summer 2001 drought. Bremerton
requested 10% voluntary conservation and customers saved 18% that summer. Customers
a� appear to be continuing ^�-���onservation ^�^��..r :��� �nn�
A relatively high sewer rate based on water use.
The ERU values for Bremerton continue to decline. This is due to the reasons listed above plus
the implementation of plumbing regulations in 1992 that require newly-installed toilets to use
only 1.6 gallons per flush. The City's conservation program is expected to reduce per unit
consumption by an average of 3% over the next 10 years. Domestic unit demands are then
expected to remain constant.
Future Demand
The �� 2005Water System Plan demand projections were based on data from the �98 2000
census and the �� most recent Bremerton Comprehensive Plan.
.'.
. Figure 3 rresents the rorulation
forecast used.
The �� 2005 Water System Plan identifies needs for a 20-year planning period from �9-9 2005
to �8�9 2024. During that time it is expected that ADD will increase from 8 MGD in �9-9 to �
CittLof Bremerton Comtirehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 63
Exhibit C.2
MGD by year �9. MDD is expected to increase from �415.6 MGD to �-3 22.6 MGD during this
same time period. Figure 4 presents the demand forecast used.
Residential Po ulation Forecasts Cit of Bremerton Main S stem Water Su I Area
Bremerton Retail Water Service Population Served by Bremerton Total
Area Po ulation Throu h Contract Population
Year Inside Outside Jackson Rocky Point Served by
PSNS & City of
City City Total IMF Park Navy Water
Limits C,imits Housing District Bremerton
System
� POPULATION HISTORY
2000 35,103 13,2i1 48,314 109 2,047 1,636 52,106
2001 34,009 �3,246 47,256 1,040 2,211 1,646 52,152
2002 33,184 �3,282 46,466 1,972 2,374 I,656 52,468
2003 33,289 13,317 46,606 2,903 2,538 1,667 53,714
2004 32,078 �4,203 46,281 2,903 2,539 1,704 53,427
� POPULATION FORECAST
2005 34,431 15,090 49,521 2,903 2,540 1,740 56,704
2006 35,002 �5,977 50,978 2,903 2,541 1,777 58,199
2007 35,572 �6,863 52,436 2,903 2,543 1,813 59,695
2008 36,143 17750 53,893 2,903 2,544 1,850 61,190
2009 36,714 �g,637 55,351 2,903 2,545 1,886 62,685
2010 37,285 �9,523 56,809 2,903 2,546 1,923 64,180
2011 37,856 z0,410 58,266 2,903 2,547 1,959 65,675
2012 38,427 �� 297 59,724 2,903 2,548 1,996 67,L70
2013 38,998 2� �g4 6l,(81 3,903 2,549 2,032 68,666
2014 39,569 23,070 62,639 2,903 2,550 2,069 70,161
20i5 4Q139 23,957 64,096 2,903 2,552 2,105 71,656
2016 4Q710 ?4,844 65,554 2,903 2,553 2,141 73,151
2017 41,28t 25,730 67,O11 2,903 2,554 2,178 74,646
2018 41,852 26,617 68,469 2,903 2,555 2,214 '76,141
2019 42,423 2�,504 69,926 2,903 2,556 3,251 77,637
2020 42,994 Zg,390 71,384 2,903 2,557 2,287 79,132
2021 43,565 29,277 72,842 2,903 2,558 2,324 80,627
2022 44,136 30,164 74,299 2,903 2,559 2,360 82,122
2023 44,708 31,050 75,759 2,903 2,561 2,397 83,619
2024 45,208 3i,937 77,145 2,903 2,562 2,433 85,043
ulahon data supplied by [he City of Bremerton Department of Commumty Development w�th the followmg me[hodology.
I Transportation Analysis Zoncs (TAZ) data provided by Krtsap County, Novembcr 2005
2 TAZ Smgle Family (SF) and Mul[i Famdy (MF) Houscholds providcd for basc ycar 2003 and pro�cctcd ycar 2025
3 SF and MF Houscholds agbaegated to total number of houscholds per "CAZ
4 Smgle Family (SF) and Mulh Famdy (MF) Households for 2000 from Jata prepared at time of 2004 Bremerton Comprehensrve Plan
.itsap Household S¢e from "lAu�rrntrve Hou�chold nnd Person per /lousehold Pro�ectmne Usmg t{ee GhG! Pop�dntton Pro�echone
005 & ?0! D" CTED
6 2010 Houschold S¢e for IGtsap County, from Alternative 2 Trended Headsh�p Retes (assumed), sec note 5 abovc
7 2000 His[oncal F�gure from TAZ figures used at Ume of Bremerton December 2004 Comprchensrve Plan
S Analys�s is different from 1999 WSP, as PSNS and Jackson Perk populahons were mcluded m the City's populahon
hanges from 1999 WSP Populnuon for PSNS and lackson Park now separate from the Gty's, and Tracy[on now mcluded m
)utside City Limi[5
Figure 3 Source: �9 2005 City of Bremerton Water System Plan Update
Ctt�of Bremerton Comprehenstve Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 64
Exhibit C.2
City of Bremerton Main System and Contracted Water Sales
Historical shaded and Forecasted Water Use b T e of Use in MGD
Single-tam�ly �lulh-family Average Average
Commercial Irdgation Nary Contracts Nomrevenue Water Rocky Nax Day Max Day
Res�dential Residential City of Day Day
Pomt Demand Demand
Port Demand Demand
Year Wi�h Without With W�thout With W�thout With W�t6out With Without With Wrthout H'ater Orc6ard Without W��hout N ,�� h With
Conserv Conserv Conseo- Conser- Conserv Conserv Conserv Conserv Conserv Conserv Conserv Conser- District Con[ract Conser- Conserv Conserv Conser-
vation vahon vation va[ion va[ion vation vation vadon vation vapon vation vat�on Contrect vat�on �ahon pation vat�on
1999 Z 54 NA 0 82 NA 0 96 NA 0 20 NA 2 70 NA 0 54 NA 0 12 0 08 7 96 13 46
2000 2 51 NA 0 80 NA 0 88 NA 0 22 NA 2 51 NA 0 71 NA 0 12 0 13 7 87 13 90
2001 2 32 NA 0 76 NA 0 88 NA 0 I S NA 2 62 NA 0 52 NA 0 10 0 00 7 38 11 56
2002 2 55 NA 0 77 NA 0 86 NA 0 23 NA 2 35 NA 0 22 NA 0 12 0 04 7 14 14 30
2003 2 48 NA 0 71 NA 0 91 NA 0 28 NA 2 40 NA 0 29 NA 0 13 0.04 7 24 14 50
2004 2 63 NA 0 69 NA 1 06 NA 0 30 NA 2 27 NA 0 30 NA 0 13 0 OS 7 43 14 88
2005 277 280 074 074 113 113 032 032 223 22S 044 045 013 005 79I 1582 781 1563
2006 2 S5 2 88 0 76 0 76 1 16 I 17 0 33 0 33 2 19 2 28 O 45 0 46 0 14 0 10 8 12 16 24 7 98 15 95
2007 2 92 2 96 0 77 0 78 1 21 1 22 0 34 0 34 2 I4 2 29 0 47 0 48 0 14 0 25 8 47 16 93 8 24 16 48
2008 2 98 3 04 0 79 0 80 I 25 1 26 0 35 0 35 2 10 2 30 0 47 0 49 0 14 0 25 8 63 17 27 8 34 16 67
2009 3 04 3 12 0 81 0 82 I 29 I 31 0 36 0 36 2 OS 2 31 0 48 0 SO 0 14 0 25 8 81 17 62 8 42 16 85
2010 310 320 081 084 133 135 036 037 206 231 048 051 0IS 025 898 1796 854 1708
20l 1 3 I S 3 27 0 84 0 86 1 37 1 39 0 37 0 38 2 06 2 32 0 49 0 52 0 I 5 0 25 9 15 18 29 8 69 17 37
2012 3 22 3 3S 0 86 0 88 1 45 1 48 0 38 0 39 2 07 2 33 0 50 0 S3 0 I S 0 25 9 3'/ 18 73 S 89 17 77
2013 3 27 3 43 0 88 0 90 1 53 1 57 0 39 0 40 2 OS 2 34 0 51 0 54 0 I S 0 25 9 59 19 17 9 07 18 13
2014 333 351 090 093 161 166 040 041 208 234 052 056 016 025 981 1962 925 1851
2015 3 40 3 58 0 92 0 95 1 70 1 75 0 41 0 42 2 09 2 35 0 54 0 57 0 16 0 25 10 03 20 06 9 47 18 94
2016 3 48 3 66 0 94 0 97 1 73 1 83 0 42 0 42 2 10 2 36 0 54 0 58 0 16 0 25 10 24 20 47 9 62 19 23
2017 3 55 3 74 0 96 0 99 I 85 1 90 0 43 0 43 2 10 2 37 0 56 0 59 0 16 0 25 10 44 20 87 9 87 19 73
2018 3 62 3 82 0 98 I 01 t 94 I 99 0 43 0 44 2 1 I 2 37 0 57 0 60 0 U 0 25 10 66 21 31 10 OS 20 16
2019 3 70 3 89 I 00 1 03 2 01 2 07 0 44 0 45 2 12 2 38 0 58 0 61 0 17 0 25 10 86 21 73 10 27 20 54
2020 3 77 3 97 I 02 1 OS 2 09 2 I S 0 45 0 46 2 I2 2 39 0 59 0 63 0 17 0 25 1 I 07 22 15 10 47 20 95
2021 3 84 4 OS I 04 I 07 2 18 2 24 0 46 0 47 2 t 3 2 40 0 61 0 64 0 17 0 25 1 I 29 22 59 10 69 21 38
2022 3 92 4 12 I 06 I 09 2 25 2 31 0 47 0 48 2 I4 2 40 0 62 0 65 0 18 0 25 I I 49 22 98 10 88 21 76
2023 3 99 4 20 1 08 I I I 2 34 2 40 0 48 0 49 2 14 2 41 0 63 0 66 0 18 0 25 I I 71 23 42 I I 09 22 19
2024 4 06 4 27 I 10 1 13 2 42 2 48 0 49 0 50 2 I S 2 42 0 64 0 67 0 I S 0 25 1 I 91 23 83 I I 29 22 58
Assumphons
I Smgle Famdy water use wdl mcrease at [he samc rate as populat�on growth New homes will be bu�lt w�th water etlic�ent plumbmg accordmg to lhe federal Energy Effic�ency Act
2 Mulu-famity water use wdl mcrease at the same rate as populanon growth New umts w�ll be budt with watcr effic�cnt plumbmg accordmg to the federal Energy hfticiency Act
3 Commerc�al water use will mcrcase at lhe samc rate as populat�on growth Addihonally, [he West I Iills mdus[nal arca is ant�c�pated [o begm m 2007,
and Ihe K�isap Lake mdustnal area �s antic�pated to begm m 2012
4 Irngation usc will mcrcasc at [hc samc ratc as population growth
5 Navy mdush�al uae w�ll dccrease wrth �mplementation of wnscrvation programs Navy resident�al use will mcrease shghtly w�[h populahon
6 Roc.ky Pomt watcr usc wdl m�rcasc at thc samc. ratc as populapon growth for thet arca
7 Qty of Port Or�hard water use will merease to th� max�mum amount allowed m the mtedocal agreement
8 Non-revcnuc Watcr assumcd [o bc 6 perccnt of totel customcr watcr sslcs
9 Fomcastcd Ma�umum Day Dunand �s forccastcd Avcragc Day Ucmand mul�iphcd by 2
10 Assumpt�ons uscd to celudetc dcmanJs under thc "with conscrvation" sccnarw arc dcscnbcd m Sce[�on 2 S 2
Figure 4 Source: �9 2005 City of Bremerton Water System Plan Update
Cit�of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 65
Exhibit C.2
West 517 Zone Historical (shaded) and Projected Water ADD in MGD
Water IIse Within West 517 Zone System Water to Other Systems
Total West Total ERUs
South Kitsap Aero Mobile West 517
Golf Course Intertie to
Year Commercial Industrial Total Estates (Master 517 Zone 2one
, Irrigation �, Main System �ter)
1999 0.035 0.208 0.000 0.243 0.010 0.015 0.268 1,340
2000 0.035 0.204 0.000 0.239 0.000 0.012 0.251 1,255
2001 0.035 0.135 0.000 0.170 0.020 0.012 0.202 1,010
2002 0.035 0.181 0.000 0.216 0.130 0.010 0.356 1,780
2003 0.035 0.178 0.000 0.213 0.350 0.014 0.577 2,885
2004 0.035 0.180 0.000 0.215 0.420 0.011 0.646 3,230
2005 0.035 0.200 0.000 0.235 0.150 0.013 0.398 1,990
2006 0.035 0.200 0.000 0.235 0.150 0.013 0.398 1,990
2007 0.035 0.200 0.000 0.235 0.150 0.013 0.398 1,990
2008 0.035 0.200 0.000 0.235 0.150 0.013 0.398 1,990
2009 0.035 0.200 0.000 0.235 0.150 0.013 0.398 1,990
2010 0.075 0.200 0.090 0.365 0.150 0.013 0.528 2,640
2011 0.090 0.200 0.180 0.470 0.150 0.013 0.633 3,165
2012 0.105 0.200 0.270 0.575 0.150 0.013 0.738 3,690
2013 0.120 0.200 0.360 0.680 0.150 0.013 0.843 4,215
2014 0.135 0.200 0.450 0.785 0.150 0.013 0.948 4,740
2015 0.150 0.200 0.540 0.890 0.150 0.013 1.053 5,265
2016 0.165 0.200 0.630 0.995 0.150 0.013 1.158 5,790
2017 0.180 0.200 0.720 1.100 0.150 0.013 1.263 6,315
2018 0.195 0.200 0.810 1.205 0.150 0.013 1.368 6,840
2019 0.210 0.200 0.900 1.310 0.150 0.013 1.473 7,365
2020 0.225 0.200 1.000 1.425 0.150 0.013 1.588 7,940
2021 0.240 0.200 1.100 1.540 0.150 0.013 1.703 5,515
2022 0.255 0.200 1.200 1.655 0.150 0.013 1.818 9,090
2023 0.270 0.200 1.300 1.770 0.150 0.013 1.933 9,665
2024 0.285 0.200 1.400 1.885 0.150 0.013 2.048 10,240
Assumptions:
1. Commercial use in the West 517 Zone is assumed to increase through the McCormick pro�ect and NASCAR.
2. Golf course irrigation will stay the same on average. Values are total use averaged over the year.
3. SKIA will grow according to the estimate provided in the 1999 Subarea Plan between 2010 and 2029.
4. Intertie to the Main System varies depending on needs; value used is the average from 1999 to 2004.
5. Aero Mobile Estates is at build out; value used is the average from 1999 to 2004.
6. ERU calculated using value from the Bremerton Main System: 200 gallons per day per ERU for ADD.
7. More water than usual was supplied through the intertie in 2003/04 due to drier than normal weather.
Figure 4 Source: 2005 City of Bremerton Water System Plan Update
CittLof Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 66
Exhibit C.2
Proposed Facility Improvements
Water Utility improvements are discussed in more detail in the �33 2005 Water System Plan
Update. Chapter 9 of this plan outlines a 20-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Each year
the Utility fine-tunes its 6-year CIP which is presented at the end of this section.
Water Sources
The Water Utility has sufficient water to meet demands for the next six years. From a water
rights standpoint, the Water Utility has a}�p°^••^� sufficient water rights for the near
future. , '
. ,
,-„ , „ ��.,, r ..,�,,,. .,..,a �....,a,..,,,i;,, ,. ��.,.,,,,,,. a,. ...,.,- .,ii„�., .,n � � ,.,. �.,, , ,a
$��L�}�a�e9l�s���'e�eE�S-��Sfr�Se�ss�12S-cricir,SCCa-irr�'cii. cir
To ensure reliability and redundancy, it is the Utility' s goal to be able to meet average day
demands with groundwater only. Future water rights will be from groundwater. The Water
Utility has several water rights applications submitted to Ecology:
Change application for five Domsea Wells with a priority date of 1992.
New application in Gorst for 1,000 gpm with a priority date of 1992
One new application for We1121 with a priority date of 1992
One new application for 1,000 gpm for We119 with a priority date of 1994
Processing of new applications has been stalled for many years due to staffing and resources at
Ecology. Ecology's focus will be on processing change applications first and it is not known
when they will begin on new applications.
Water Quality
Meeting strict water quality standards is a primary objective of the City. Drinking water is
regularly tested at the sources and in the distribution system.
To continue to use the ••� �'�a Union River source unfiltered, the City should continue to
pursue either acquisition or controlling agreements over the remaining 2% of private lands
within the watershed, and should vigorously implement the Watershed Control Plan.
Responsible operation of the entire water system is critical to maintaining compliance with the
non-filtration status of the surface water treatment regulations. Even with these precautions, a
drastic change in source quality or changes in regulations could require the City to provide
filtration. Installation of UV disinfection in 2010 will further enhance Bremertori s ability to
remain unfiltered.
P rnn t C �1-. L,� 1� L, ,] c C �nl.,a,,,. T«,,.,�-.�.,,..�. n„1„ ..�
r r b
F 1+...,.,:,.1„t /rr�l\ 1; L,� +1 �-
cH�@� � �St F�d�l�il� d£��}�}6� �9 F�l�A�'��te �Se 6z ar�ravivrcc�vv7
i
Storage
The Water Utility was analyzed using hydraulic modeling soEtware program. The evaluation
completed for the �9 2005 Water System Plan indicated that the only futur�
CitU of Bremerton Comprehensive Plnn
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 67
Exhibit C.2
storage deficit was in the West pressure z�A�449 �ones. This deficit will be eliminated by the
construction of a�-2.5 million gallon reservoir by 2024. '
These projects are included in the CIP.
Distribution System
Improvements in transmission and distribution mains are necessary to improve flows and
pressures in certain areas and to replace sub-standard mains. The Utility allocates funds each
year to address sub-standard mains. Other larger main improvements are also listed in the CIP.
Plans of Other Providers
There are no other providers of potable water within the City. However, there are several
nearby water districts, public utility districts and municipalities that may have interests in local
surface and groundwater resources. These include: Silverdale Water District, North Perry
Avenue Water District, Erland Point Water District, Sunnyslope Water District, and the City of
Port Orchard. The Water Utility has service area agreements with each water system with
adjacent boundaries.
The Kitsc�p County Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), a regional water supply, transmission,
and storage plan, was developed by the Water Utility Coordinating Committee (WUCC) and
last updated in 2005 �� to comply with state law. The plan assesses water supply needs in
Kitsap County and presents a program to provide water supply and service to users. The plan
provides a process and strategy for existing water utilities to define their role in a program
consistent with adopted land use policies and projected growth strategy. T�. r'�n�cn :,.
Watershed planning for Water Resources Inventory Area 15 (the "2514 process") commenced in
2000. The City of Bremerton �s was one of the initiating governments for this process. The final
plan �s was scheduled to be completed in 2005, but was vetoed by the Squaxin Tribe.
Six-Year Financial Plan
The following chart contains the funding sources, capacity projects, and non-capacity projects
for the next six years.
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 68
Exhibit C.2
Project 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Watermains 415,000 1,115,000 3,175,000 2,850,000 850,000 1,000,000
Reservoirs & Dam 0 295,000 250,000 0 2,850,000 7,250,000
Pump Stations 75,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000
Water Source (Weils and Surface Water) 0 140,000 100,000 125,000 250,000 575,000
Water Treatment 5,660,000 75,000 0 0 50,000 0
Water Appurtenances 165,000 365,000 365,000 560,000 290,000 290,000
Bwldmgs 720,000 885,000 900,000 0 0 0
Roads and Bndges 35,000 20,000 70,000 20,000 20,000 70,000
Land 0 135,000 0 0 0 0
Equipment 10,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
TOTAL EXPENSE 7,080,000 3,190,000 5,005,000 3,700,000 4,455,000 9,330,000
CihLof Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 69
Exhibit C.2
\AlATCD IICOAGTIIACAIT
- �094 2�9rd �A96 �84x 289� �999 �8 2�1-'4 �eEaF
�� - - - - -
�al��se S9 $�2�1� $� $�� $&4��- $�� $9 $1-f�9 -
�-� - - - - -
�NateF-AAaµa - - - - -
��
a-8�898 �A9 �89 �AA �AA �98,�988 3A4,�999 �AA ,$�899
AA+seeAa�ee�s
��
�a � a-94�999 �99,98A a-9A,9A9 a-98 �9��989 a-9A �59
P�ersea-6Fee1E
€�4ew-�-�Rfess�e &89 49A-88A 8 9 A 8 8 4 a-A99
�AlaEef-�'ste�
�es�
�9 �9 8 9 9 A 9 9 �AA9
,4a�al-Asc}�s�+e�
e�-�e�lasa�er�E
AAetexs �a,999 ra9-,A99 a9 d`A-,�899 a�A-,�9A8 ra8-,989 aA �A 3�5
2� 2�-9AA �9 �&998 29 �&889 29 2A �a�AB
A�p-�aF�er�
��eseast�sE�ec�-
�A84-RS#4
�A�es�Ns �99 �A2� 9 8 8 A 9 9 ,a-9a8
�
5A 468 9 9 8 8 8 9 �9
���
�9 �9 a-9 a-9,999 a-9,999 a-9 a-9 �8 �8A8
�a�a-999 �28,�88A �99 8 9 8 8 8 a-`a9a,�AAB
�d-R�+r�p
�EaHea-�4ew
A�eEeFS 8 �A 8 9 A 8 8 8 �A-999
�asyEer�VUaEef
�+s�eF
+�Feve�eFlis
RMas�µ �-8A9 A 9 9 9 8 9 9 7-2�989
�2�aas-�lAa�► � 8 8 A 9 A 8 9 �SA
Aa�eFSeR-GFSeI�
r mert rehensiv lan g g g g g g g�qgg
� ���t;vi ce Append x CS Appe ix - 70
8 54 8 8 A 8 9 A �4-9As
o„�.,.,.,.,. ��� � o��
� 29�999 A 8 9 A 8 9 8 �89
�e �8�9A9 8 8 9 8 8 8 8 �99;998
Exhibit C.2
��
�� e aea,�es a,eee;ees a,see e e s e �aee
, ��� �,�� ,�,.,,e.
��-a�a. e aa�ees a a s g e a �a�;ees
�2�-BISFUUaIe�
AAa�r-R+a�te
9 8 �9 8 8 8 8 9 �6,sA9
8 2�A98 8 8 8 9 8 8 2&9A9
�
Skee6#rer�-gysteK
�
,4v� 9 9 9 8 �5�998 ,�--�ar9,�99 8 8 �599�A8
�w+na-�akes
9+vefsieR
9 �a,�99 8 9 9 8 8 9 �5
6eveF-feF
8 9 8 9 8 �9�A98 8 8 �9�999
8 8 �A9 8 8 8 9 9 �8
��
°,�� 8 8 A �899 8 9 9 9 $�999
��
9 9 63 8 9 9 9 8 �999
��
�
�aRs-1AFe►F 8 8 4 �9 �88 8 8 9 �a9
�
{6afaya42e}��
8 9 �&899 9 8 8 9 9 7�999
49A-�eae
€�Eteps+e�e�
8 9 8 4�A99 8 8 9 9 4�998
�2='-Ma+a--
Ms1A�+lkar�as�id-
6�-fe-Ru3e-�� 8 8 8 �9A8 8 9 9 8 �AA9
9 8 8 �99 8 8 9 9 �99
�-AAaia-Baws
��r���t-6eaneste� 9 8 9 �C3-999 8 9 A 9 �r9A9
6el�Aqe�ata+a
6el�e�se
8 8 9 659 8 9 9 9 &5A�A9
�e
��
9 8 9 9 4�A98 8 8 9 41�999
�eeeare«-P1�a-4
9e�aekHea A 8 8 8 �4�994 8 8 8 34a-999
�te-Br+�A�el�#S A 8 8 9 3�.?999 8 8 9 �?999
L�sA-#9
6k�leFFaaE+ec}&
8 8 A 9 �9A9 8 9 9 �999
A0.aaeEte-�f�Qe
�FU��AA4
�e �8A9 8 8 9 8 8 9 9 �9A9
�2='-BFSt-1A�ateF
�-�t�
8 8 8 9 8 &4A 9 9 &49
F�ae-Rea��-AAs
� WaEe�AAata 9 9 A 6 8 � 8 9 �
�8�-4.99-�eae
9 8, 8 6 8 �$a-999 9 9 ��888
A 9 8 9 9 �S9;9AA 9 9 �88
Cih� o�'Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 71
Exhibit C.2
��
e e g s e s s s e
��
s� $a-�a�es �a�a�e� �a�eea �aa�eea �?a�ees �-�eee $4�aees �a�e�as �es
�+�
s�s - - - -
�e
�ee �ea,see S�se;99s $�ee;see Sa-eee;ses Sa-eae;9ea Sa;9�e;9ee Q ��',"� ��
��
��
�ee�ee �ee;eee a-ee;ees �ee;eee �ea,�ees �ee;eeg �ee;eeg �ee �ee
� ��ea,ses a,aee �;aee-esa �ee;ees a,�ea,�eee �;eea,sse �;eee-ees a-eee a,5ee
�-�-a�s a a-eee-eee e e g g g e a-eee
� �ea,�eee e g s e a e s �ea,�ees
C4�4e�Y
t-��1`Y�JrP t�Otltl�tlbKY � C C C V tl C ��Cdtl-�Htltl
�
t°7rrt°rrr . � G 'C. /���+ ���
p �������� o^^ � ^ Ytl�'��" tl H tl tl C( '� tl t H Ytt�'L"'Vt
1"l'CM'Ct1RSV�YV� tl tl V tl tl 00�'G�O tl tf �
�9E3�A�{", Q � ��� ���
��s �� � � ,�r � Q"� 7 m='r=o'= A +v �� C`J 1 ��c�r �
� � � � �/ � � � '
�F @��� ���
R@68f�F@6 � �� � �r'rd� �, r ' � � �
���
$�40 $4�9�;889 $44�888 $4�&8A9 $4�;888 $4�8888 54�9�888 $4�99g -
GaqitaE�eF'�°1e-s#
8�iaa�R�aw�
�/alue $�7� - -
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 72
Exhibit D.1
Bremerton has a complete bicycle route
network that extends through East and ■ Kitsap Way (SR-310) -11th to
West Bremerton. However, most of the National (LOS D approaching LOS E)
bicycle routes do not have dedicated ■ Sylvan Way - Wheaton to Petersville
bicycle lanes. Lack of bicycle lanes on (LOS D approaching LOS E)
designated routes is a safety problem ■ Warren Avenue (SR-303) - Callahan to
not only for bicycle riders but also for Sheridan (LOS D approaching LOS E)
drivers of automobiles. Exceptions to ■ Wheaton Way (SR 303) - Sheridan to
this status-quo include the recently Riddell (LOS D approaching LOS E)
constructed sections of SR 304, which
has dedicated bicycle lanes, and Kitsap Operational, Safety, and Other
Way, which has wide-shoulders which De iciencies
could be made suitable for use by - -
,:, ...
bicyclists. �-� - A'
��
:�
In 2007 the Non-Motorized � �' � ��
Transportation Plan (NMTP) was 7 k � � ���� `
� ��
integrated as an element of the �� _' ` �
i_ � 1
Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance --_ !.___- -
#5037. �x �
�.* . ��
;;
��, r ,_„ � "�..
In 2009 the Commute Trip Reduction ��� —�__ _ ��`
(CTR) Program was integrated as an � °����' '" �
element of the Comprehensive Plan by Discussions with City staff and the
Ordinance # Bremerton Citizeri s Advisory Committee
identified other existing transportation
Both of these plans (NMTP & CTR) system deficiencies. These deficiencies
work towards the goals outlined in the include: Auto Center Way between Kitsap
comprehensive plan to reduce Way and the SR-3 southbound On-Ramp;
automobile traffic and increase the Loxie Eagans Blvd./Arsenal Way and 1st
safety and movement of pedestrians. Street to SR 304 connections; Lower
Please see full plans for details of �eaton Way between Sheridan Road and
implementation and goals. Callahan Drive; Warren Avenue at 11th
Street; and, the Downtown Core.
Existing De f2CleytClBS The future transportation improvement
plan, discussed in Chapters 4 and 5 of the
Appendix, include improvements to
Roadway Capacity Deficiencies address the operational deficiencies in
As required by GMA, existing these areas.
transportation system capacity
deficiencies have been identified based
on the LOS analysis described in Section
2.4 of the Transportation Appendix.
The following existing roadway sections
exceed or are close to exceeding this
Level of Service D threshold during the
PM peak hour:
Cit�of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan TR-6
Transportation Element
Exhibit D.2
Transportation Appendix - 2009 Update
T'he current Bremerton Comprehensive Plan - Transportation Element was prepared in 2004.
That plan identified a number of roadway capacity, operational and safety; transit service and
facility; ferry service and facility; pedestrian and bicycle; transportation demand management;
transportation system management; and traffic calming strategies, programs, improvements
and projects. A significant number of these have been completed and a number of them have
yet to be completed. The guiding visions, goals and objectives have not changed and will
continue to guide the development of the City's transportation system until a major review and
update of the Transportation Element is completed.
As projects have been completed additional projects have been identified to add to the list that
is consistent with the vision of the 2004 Plan. Following is a summary of the status of the major
elements of the 2004 Plan and the proposed elements of the extension of the Plan. This
summary forms the basis for the Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) that guides
the City and State and Federal funding agencies, in its transportation project development.
Completed Projects
Projects that have been completed since the 2004 Plan was adopted include:
1. SR304 Improvements from Downtown to SR3
2. SR303 Off ramp to Callahan Drive
3. Auto Center Way On ramp to SR3
4. Downtown Bremerton Transportation Center (BTC) Access Improvements - Tunnel
5. Adoption of the Bremerton Non-Motorized Transportation Plan (NMTP).
Projects to be Completed and Additional Projects
The following comprise the current list of projects that are in support of the vision, goals and
objectives of the 2004 Plan. This list includes projects identified, but not completed due to
funding limitations, as well as new projects that have funding secured or potential funding to
be pursued.
1. Downtown Traffic Circulation Plan - With the completion of the BTC Access
Improvements significant opportunities exist to restructure the auto/truck and non-
motorized traffic flow to enhance the redevelopment of the area. This project will
analyze various options that are now possible.
2. Manette Bridge Replacement - The Washington Department of Transportation is
currently designing the replacement for the Manette Bridge that was originally
constructed in 1929. This $83million project is totally funded by Federal Briclge
Replacement Program funding, with construction starting in the spring of 2010.
3. SR303 at 11th Street Intersection - This $1.7million project improves the intersection
operations and safety by extending the southbound right turn lane. Eighty six percent of
the cost is provided by Federal grants.
Exhibit D.2
4. Bremerton Highway/Pedestrian Safety Improvement Program - This $.9 million project
improves vehicular and pedestrian safety at a number of high accident locations
throughout the City and is funded fully by a Federal safety grant.
5. Wheaton Way at Schley Canyon Landslide Restoration - This project restores the culvert
and roadway embankment washed out by the storm event of December 2007. Up to
$500,000 has been approved for reimbursement by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) for this work on an 86.5 percent grant basis.
6. Pacific Avenue Improvements - The FHWA has approved an 86.5 percent grant up to
$3million to reconstruct Pacific Avenue, from 6th to 11th Streets, in a pedestrian/bicycle
friendly manner to foster "sustainable' redevelopment. In addition, approximately
$400,000 has been made available by the State to reconstruct Pacific Avenue from
Burwell to 5�.
7. City Street Pavement Preservation Program - The Bremerton Transportation Benefit
District, if approved by the voters, would provide approximately $675,000 per year for
repaving of City streets.
8. City Sidewalk Program - The Bremerton Transportation Benefit District, if approved by
the voters, would provide approximately $225,000 per year for construction of new
sidewalks.
9. Green Streets Program - Portions of 7th, 8� and 10�" Streets were identified, in the
Downtown Sub Area Plan for redevelopment using "green" or sustainable design
principals. These streets, as well as others, will be redeveloped as anticipated State and
Federal grant funding for green/sustainable street projects become available.
10. Non-motorized Transportation Plan(NMTP) Projects - A list of bicycle and pedestrian
improvement projects were identified in the NMTP. These projects will be developed as
available funding sources become available.
11. Marine Drive Non-Motorized Transportation Improvements - This project was
identified in the NMTP and will be constructed as resources become available. It is
anticipated that planned utility work in the street corridor may provide an opportunity
for this work to be completed as part of the street restoration phase of the utility work.
12. Pine Road Non-Motorized Transportation Improvements - This project was identified in
the NMTP and will be constructed as resources become available.
13. Harrison District Traffic Circulation Improvements - The Harrison District Plan,
adopted in 1996, identified various traffic circulation improvements for the area. These
improvements will be developed as resources become available.
Exhibit D.2
14. Oyster Bay Avenue Improvements - The redevelopment of the Westpark Neighborhood
as Bay Vista is anticipated to create improvement needs to Oyster Bay Avenue. These
improvements will be developed as resources become available.
15. Wheaton Way at Magnusson Way Intersection Improvements - The redevelopment of
the Eastpark Neighborhood is anticipated to create traffic signal needs at this
intersection. These improvements will be developed as resources become available.
16. Arsenal Way/Patton Avenue Safety Improvements - This project was identified in the
2004 Plan and includes curb, gutter, sidewalks, lighting, roadway widening, and
intersection improvements. These improvements will be developed as resources become
available.
17. Bremerton Airport Area Transportation Issues - With the annexation of the Bremerton
Airport and the development of the surrounding airport environs issues will develop
regarding the improvement of access to and from the Airport, including the Cross-SkIA
Connector. These improvements will be developed as resources become available.
18. SR303 Transportation Corridor - T'he 2002 SR303 Corridor Study identified this as a long
range major multi-modal regional corridor improvement project. These improvements
will be developed as resources become available.
19. SR3/SR16 Improvements - The 2009 Bremerton Economic Development Study identified
a wide range of improvements to SR3 and SR16, including improvements to the highway
through the Gorst Area. This major regional project is long range in nature and will be
developed as resources become available.
20. Traffic Calming Program - The 2004 Plan recommended traffic calming as an important
consideration in the City's overall list of transportation activities. Interest in this topic by
neighborhood groups and individuals is on the increase. A policy and a"seed" money
budget should be established to assist neighborhood groups in developing appropriate
traffic calming measures.
Exhibit D.2
Transportation Improvement Program Summary Table
Proiect 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Downtown Traffic Circulation 25,000 �
Bremerton Hi�hwaY Safety Improvement Program 940,000
SR303 at 11th Street Intersection 1,298,000 730,000
Wheaton Wax at Schley Canyon Landslide Restorahon 500,000
--- -------------- ---- ---- ----- -- -------
Pacific Ave Improvements - Burwell to 5�h 900,000
Pac�fic Ave Improvements - 5�h to ll�h 505,000 2,500,000
City Street Pavement Preservation 337,500 337,500 337,500 337,500 337,500 337,500
City Sidewalk Improvements 112,500 112,500 112,500 112,500 112,500 112,500
Green Streets Program 800,000 800,000
SR304 Navy Yard HWY Stage 1D 80,000
Pavement Condition Rating 35,000
Miscellaneous 25,000
Arterial Street Signa e 10,000
� Total � 4,768,000 � 4,480,000 � 1,250,000 � 450,000 � 450,000 � 450,000 �
Exhibit E.1
Please see previously provided
2008 Stormwater Management Plan Update
(On file in Council office and on Web at
http://www.ci.bremerton.wa.us/displav.php?id=1039)
Exhibit E.2
Stormwater
The City of Bremerton (City) approved its Stormwater Management Plan in 1996. The 2008
Stormwater Management Plan (Plan) provides a guiding document for stormwater
management and operational planning to meet regulatory requirements.
The 2008 Plan update addresses the necessary changes due to changing Federal and State laws,
permit requirements and programs, most notably the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Phase II Permit and Puget Sound Partnership's agenda. The object of the
update is to describe the specific program enhancements, staffing and resources needed to meet
these requirements.
The Purpose of the plan update is to evaluate the present operations, staffing and capital
improvements of the City's stormwater program, suggest improvements to enhance the
performance of the program to meet regulatory requirements, and present an approach to fund
and implement the needed improvements.
Existing Conditions
The City established its storm water utility pursuant to Ordinance 4454 in 1994 as codified in
the Bremerton Municipal Code 15.04. The Bremerton City Council approved the City of
Bremerton Stormwater Management Plan final report in 1996. Stormwater Utility rates are
provided for in BMC 15.06.05.
The City uses the 1992 Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin, published
by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), and the 1997 Kitsap County
Stormwater Management Manual as the technical basis for managing stormwater from new
development within the City.
Regulatory Requirements
The NPDES permit program is designed to reduce or eliminate the discharge of pollutants to
surface water. The NPDES Phase II Permit for "small" municipal separate stormwater systems
was finalized by Ecology in january 2007, and issued to the City with an effective date of
February 17, 2007.
Minimum Control Measures
The following six control measures must be implemented as part of the stormwater
management program under the NPDES Phase II Permit:
• Public education programs and outreach activities about the impacts of
stormwater.
• Public involvement/participation in the developmet, implementation and review
of the stormwater program.
• Program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges to the City owned strom drain
system.
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 50
Exhibit E.2
• Program to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff associated with construction,
new development and redevelopment projects.
• Operation and maintenance (O&M) program for post construction stormwater
facilities. •
• Pollution prevention and good housekeeping of municipal facilities.
The City is currently in compliance with NPDES requirements and timelines; however, several
actions are needed in 2009 to remain consistent with permit conditions. Table ES-1 summarizes
compliance requirements and schedules for those elements where action is needed.
Table ES-1. Summary of Key NPDES II Permit Near Term Compliance Needs
Compiiance
Program Element Date Recommended Action
Program compliance, implementation and Identify program
organization
prioritization system January-09 and action plan
Update BMC technical standards, BMPs and Update BMC and adopt
2005
enforcement provisions August-09 Ecology Manual
Development site inspection and verification Identify staff responsibilities
program August-09 and develop database
Develop maintenance program for public and
pnvate facdities August-09 Develop O&M Plan
Annual inspection of all permitted stormwater Develop O&M Plan and
facilities including private August-09 database
Staff training for IDDE Control, O&M & Develop training curriculum
Pollution
Prevention August-09 and implement
Develop O&M Plan and
Annual inspection of all stormwater facilities February-10 database
Policies and procedures for reducmg pollutant Inventory facdities and
needs,
loadin from Cit facilities Februa -10 develo olicies
Low Impact Development
The City is participating, along with other Kitsap County jurisdictions, in development of
technical design standards to aid in implementing low impact development (LID) techniques.
These LID techniques emphasize storm water management methods that reduce impervious
azeas, retain vegetation and maximize on-site infiltration. The Kitsap Home Builders
Association (KHBA) is currently leading the LID standard development process, under a grant
agreement with Ecology. The City intends to begin implementing LID regulations in 2009.
Capital Improvement P1an
CitU of Bremerton Comprehenstve Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 51
Exhibit E.2
The purpose of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is to identify facilities needed to improve
stormwater collection, conveyance, quantity control and quality control. Projects identified for
the CIP were developed from City personnel based on their experience with the system, review
of previous City Stormwater Management Plans, and inspection and evaluation of existing City
facilities. A total of 9 projects were evaluated as part of the CIP analysis. Each project included a
description of the purpose and need, schematic design, relative priority, and planning level cost
estimates for each project. Table ES-2 presents a summary of the anticipated five-year CIP.
Table ES-2. Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan
Project 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
City Catch Basins 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Eastpark Stormwater Outfall 88,000
Shendan Conveyance 72,000 100,000
Storm Drain Replacement 185,000 100,000 550,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Culverts 25,000 334,000 28,000
Collection Systems 16,000 16,000 148,000
LID 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
Total 540,000 720,000 764,000 418,000 270,000 270,000
To improve potential grant funding opportunities, it is recommended that the City develop a
supplemental CIP list that consists of projects that address water quality corrective action, water
quality enhancement, and/or habitat restoration needs associated with stormwater
management. All of these supplemental project types fall generally within the mission of the
stormwater utility. This supplemental CIP would identify potential funding sources, and would
be implemented subject to receipt of applicable grant funding. This supplemental CIP should be
adopted as an addendum to the SWMP so that the City can document that the projects are part
of an approved plan - a criteria that is often an essential requirement for grant funding.
Existing Revenues and Costs
The primary source of revenue is the collection of the monthly user fee which is assessed based
on an Individual Service Unit (ISU). The fee is currently $8.06 per ISU per month. Monthly user
fees account for about 92 percent of revenue. Investment interest, permits, fines, and other
revenues account for the remaining eight percent of the annual revenue. Total revenue in 2008
from all sources is estimated at $3,799,165, which includes a$1,787,154 carry-over fund balance.
Expenditures in 2008 were $2,337,943 (excluding year end fund balance). Capital expenditures
accounted for about 16 percent of the total annual expenditures during the period.
Estimated Future Revenue and Costs
Costs associated with the stormwater program are expected to increase slightly during the next
five years in order to comply with NPDES permit requirements, as well as implement planned
capital improvement projects. Cost increases are associated with additional O&M, labor,
equipment and supplies, as well as administrative costs to better manage and maintain the
existing systems. Between 2009 and 2013, annual costs are expected to range between
approximately $3.5 million and $4.25 million.
Citu of Bremerton Com�rehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 52
Exhibit E.2
A comprehensive outline of the Capital Facility Needs and funding are provided in the 2008
Stormwater Management Plan Llpdate, adopted by City Council Ordinance and
incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan.
. ,
, ,
�.
• � .
�
� � . �
� ,
�asi�-P4a�e �iGFes
Citu of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 53
Exhibit E.2
HAYAl��'fG�� A# L�11�11MA �TAAI'�t�
�
�
..,.� ��..,, n„«,- Tn�.,�i..:..,.+,.,, �r.,..«,...,�
k ,,..,,,,�..,..,,«,. a�, ,�;�,,,..,.�.,,,,� ..tl „ ,.F ,a,,..,......,..,a„ C«,.,.. �.L,,, � ..:a.,,.., .. ,.11,,,,�-:,...
�
E :,.�� .-. ,,,,� , ., 1..«,�„ .. ..�:,.,. .-. ,,,.� :., �-1�„ . .,:�-., ,-.0 r'.,11,.�., A t,,,....�, L.,.�..,,.,,..
..�,,,. r ,�: j.,..� ..u� ���
R.,,.�.>.,11 ..,�„d 'I'I
i
��te-����eue��� e� ��te €e�Fe �a��t ��e�t se�ve�������t�e�rE���k=�ee�-�,�-��se�t�=
, � �n T�.,, � �te-r'�
�a�se-�e�e� "�a��a��s �e� Fve�k �� ��e ���g�� e€ Wa�•�'�'�tese a�e-r���s�a�t�a�ds �b�-1�Ek
a ....;.. ..,.i,,,.,,,.i t.,,-.:i:�:,.,.
Cit�of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 54
Exhibit E.2
A . ., R.,
�2SFR �9$�
i
�SFF1 �FA}@6� 69S�S
CitU of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 55
Exhibit E.2
�n�i�-
CittLof Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
City Service Appendix CS Appendix - 56
Exhibit F
Please see previously provided
Commute Trip Reduction Plan
(On file in Council office and on Web at
http://www.ci.bremerton.wa.us/displav.php?id=1039)
6� 2009 Com Plan Amendments - Exhibit G
� p
a
, I
� � R � a r � � � � D� i ---- � I
� j _ % F' �W ' � � � �
��—�—�--�� G
� f r--� qh R � � � � i , �
i � r`�.� c �
1 ,
' RIDGEM�AY-Rl _ � : , ? � �
i
--� (; - �--�--�__ �_ ,,—�—�� � � � � o l i
--�! ����. �`- ' �����- ' �' 1 1 ' `� �� � � .
�p � ' � pi o ' a�; � `t �� G �FO;,:_-� � �-
�l---�---! � 3 � p �� ; � � �� i O��
�� � � � � 11 � � \ o �
_ `L� —� �i � E ?(���� � � � I.' '� '�� �'\ �\ V �� �
"I � --,{` � � ` \
�_ � ;
0 1
� ,J� I� .� �
� � '' �-� "�`< -� � ��� �� � � � �� '�\� �._��
( �
�t-AKfVIEW=D�R-; 1 �• � ti t _- _ � _ '� �\ �'\ \ � �
�,�'--!-- --�---_t ��, __ �` r - - - ' �
__i_1 � _ _ _ ' ' ' � f � � � \ \ �\ ��� �� \�
�----� ------- - ---- ---- -1_ _ � t�� � �. � � ��__ �
- -- - - - ---�
� � -- � � Redesi n '
� I� --� ----_ __________ ___ _____- g ate this region �„ ; �
� -�--�_ -- ----- -- ---------- outlined in black to � I
�, , � � �
�`�� � ___._- ------ ------ � --_ '! Limited Commercial `\��S !
1r > > � ��. � - - -_---- -_ ,, \ i qTF
� �,� �—_ �--_--_- __ _ �i ��. A� � i �
�� .
- - - - - - - �. �
�'� -- - - - --_ - -_- - -_ - - -_ �, �� �
1 �
,-�� `' �„w'`� --_ --_ '_ _ _ -_ - - -_ -- -- � \��--_ �,, '_
�� �_� '
�l j l � ; � '� =� _ - _ � __ -_ _-__- -_ � ----__
� .:' j` �' ,� 'Y' i � �`���, - - - --� - -- - - -- � \'
-�;. _ � ``�=�,.� ,%= � ' _ _� _ --___ _ - ---_ � � �
_ �_ �'/ - -'`��=�'/; � - -- . ��\ - - _ _- _-__- i _ -__ - --__-_- _ _ _ -� �
_ _`_��;` _ - -�� ,}'/ i \��� \\ �� _ -_ -__ � _ -__ -_ __ ___ _ _ _ ___ -_ __ _ I
, '' �� y "=' ` `"� ~� � \ __ -_ \�.� -_ � -- - --- -- -------- ---- - -------- i
';, - - - �= ,�; � _ _ A �i� - _ -_ --� _ _- _ _- _- - �
�;.�`i. - --. ��,.:-. "-�, =-'�, .�V _ �� � � - _ _ - -- - -- -_ __ -
�� '�!_ ��.' �� - - ^ ��� /� i �. �_— —_ --- —L__—
_` -.. ��,( =a'. _ ,-_t'> �/� ��i�/ ..� � --��
=,= . ^� "..� . . F' �� 4'��\ � \\��\ ' � -
,, ;�' - - ��- - ������ ��'�� �� ������ � �� �� ���� �
_ ,r „'- - .,- .,-... � :Y; � , � -� � � � , ��, � : ,�,�,'� � i
- _ _ _ , . , « - - � . 'r �"_ W , - ;. _ -_ �� ' y9 � / � ` I �
- � . ,, - _. � - .., _ �f:_`,:- - �,.� . :� � ���' � ���� � ( � �� �9
,_ �..,- r -_"@^r � . ".r-. � , �,r� , - �l ���Q .�� ������ �! ( �����—
,�. `.=. w - - = - ,�' � • � 9� ,�� A�V` �� 1 r---� � � �' ' ` ���
- Legend '�._ � , �--.,,, _ , � � ��� � � �
i � / . \� �� ��j\�� ,
- qezone rarceis � umicea commareiai _ ���� a {� A�`I1/lA��. /Z � �
� � � �---
_ pb �m�a �� Neiqhbomoo0 8uvness �� /� \�/ ? 1 � �.\ �� \, � � \ / � � , ( y �
FutureReseneCemer � FreewavComdo� - ""�"\ / �� �� j f� �% ��'.,� ( � / l � � `� (
/ � ;��� � i � iA�A ��`.—��� ,i R�� � %
� Pdoptea Sub Area Plan Intluslnal _ _ / \ \ / � � i
- Repwnal CentBr � Intlu9nal Park _ - '-/ � �\ 1 \\ { . \�� / � `��\ Q ��— ��
� ` � ' / 1 'Q
� � o�smacenre� � Ma�reme�z�ai �-° - t � � � \; � �.i �� � � ���" r �
- Manufac�unng/intlustnal Cente� Higher Education � ^� � �� / ~x / ^\` � � � \ \\ � ' ?O \, i �.� \ � � �� �
� n��9noomooace��e� i a ove�saa�a -``�' � ���t. /� ��. �. � t �" ;r ���� % '�� �%� � -
=��,. ' -ti . =� , - - �",_ Y� i A \ / ,Q V`�� �i
- - EmPloYment Center � Puget SounO Nava1 ShivYartl - - �.� / � �} 1� F * '\ � � � ,�.
/
_ � / \ �"_ ` �—Q � � �(��.( ' C/ \ Y � � I f
( , Low Densry ResMemial � Public Sec�or Retlevelopment 9te ' ' - � ==�,= -� ,v' �
j GN Core Rentlennal - watershea - , . •"'�.: ' - / / W � � % � ":0� � �
\ � R __�7 �
1 �
_ _ Commerciel Gorritlor GN UtA�N �ntls - - ' ` �•� ' ' °��� ` 1 ��} � � \ / � { �
� `MieaMn Wa Retlevelo �`� �� �� ' �� / , � t � i \�
- u y pment Cqrntlor - T2nsportdtim, Utlltties, anU Pud�c FacAities f.� j .� ' ✓ ,," �" � r ,. `\� � � �
� � _ � �� �
�'f `...^ ` �. - 'c�' -: - - : —�`-� � --� '1 � t �
„�,�, �~, ✓�-�l -_ j } � �I --- ��I/�/ \� .�
a W�w n..nw,rosa *vrvm=�.riww.am�mmm�mmaw.�somuh�� � .. '�.�. . � y �' � I� i ' � I �\l J "_'_"'
_ �_.,A..M --- ".�; " - _ _, - �,_ I I � �
- - - - _ ` - - _ � `. -- _ _ , . - _ . , - . _ � � �� — r -- --��� � �
I � �
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 11/17/09
Minutes for
City of Bremerton Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
•
September 15, 2009
I. Call to Order ,;�
� �� � ��
,: T1_.td,;,,Li,s�+,b"
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Wheeler at 5:30 p.mc�����"'
� q ����,�,_ R.
i°97-�j�'� k���j^
II. Roll Call �`�� ��h
fi-t,�e��-�
Y ����� �'���
'�' '� ' �E'" � ,
,-� '�' ��� !d",� .
Those present were: Commissioner Hoell, Commissioner��Kosusko, Commissioner Mosiman, and
n3,� �.�� ���,�e��
Chairman Wheeler. Commissioners Cockburn, Kenned,y, and Streissguth were;�excused. Quorum
��� ,
certified. �'�';,,�'��`.,-� '����'°�;'°�
� �,-.r,
�,u�,�:..
�'' - ,,�,�, ,_
�•
t:�-�, 41 ���5`� ,(; �lF�+'�r
�'°�� ;f �;z�?`;�' �
Also present: Andrea Spencer, Lindsey Sehmel and Pam�Bykonen�(DCD staf�, Mike Mecham and
c '_` `�" r'.;r`��'f
Larry Matel (Public Works) and Wyn Birkenthal (Parks):��,�� �;�,--�,���'
�. sr
r. �9�� .,���n
'4 y��,�:� j "�".��
�—�`� ��.�"`., �s. i�
�a' �..' � �.� w�a
III. ���Approval�of
�"{, �� e� �"'ffi e�'� "iT
'F�'s � ^-' •�j�� ' �� '
ti � .a�::l.`"i�C �
Chairman Wheeler introduced�the agenda.�''A�motion`�w s�mad`e�.by Commissioner Kosusko and
,a:�����;,�:;�;L��:�,, ����.,�t�fi� �� ���_���
seconded by Commissioner� Mos�m,�an to appro,ve the agenda as presented. It was agreed by
general consensus to approve the agend'a as presented.
• ta,'i` M '4 �l�" r'�''c�u �:;,�'"�
� �s �
�`�,C�'�.7{yG ri.''i�y"�l� �7."��J&ji
� 1-+M i �J. G
,�-��,�. �°IV:, ����Approva'l�of Minutes
��,�� ; �<� �?�r'•?'`�h����°={=�;�, �
`4�i. �fiiJk��.�i' �, f�":�C�i..�_ ��,�i°
�, ��^,,,�,��,�� ��R����:��
The minute`s'�'of;�the��Regul`ar�Maeting held on��August 18, 2009 were presented for approval by
�,�,.,,�,�, �� ; ���.,�,�:,��.
� Chairmanff �;�Wheeler'.�'��A-, motion�was made by Commissioner Kosusko and seconded by
x�_c�c�.�:� `�t-�,ur�, '"''� b
Commissioner Hoell to�ap�prove�the�Regular Meeting Minutes of August 18, 2009 as presented.
Called��'for a vote: Commissioner�'�Hoell: Yes; Commissioner Kosusko: Yes; Commissioner
°�;,��;� ��,r,� ���;�
Mosiman:;�,3Yes; Chairman Wheeler: Yes. The motion carried.
�.,�� �=
'��,_��;�, � �°
_�
-u-��-� �;;. ��
��"`�;�� m��"`�` VI. Public Meeting
,� `=fi �`�'�
�ctif'� a?
�«
A. Call To The`P,alilic�(public comments on any item not on tonight's agenda).
���� ��
Chairman Wheeler asked if there were any comments from citizens. Seeing none, he closed
this portion of the meeting.
B. B. Public Hearin� for the 2009 Comnrehensive Plan Amendments: Chairman
Wheeler opened the Public Hearing for the 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
Lindsey Sehmel, City Planner, gave a presentation on six proposed Comprehensive Plan
amendments: adoption of the official Comprehensive Plan land use map, update the City
Services element and appendix, update the Transportation element and appendix, amend the
• City Services element and appendix to include the 2008 Stormwater Management Plan,
Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 2009 Page 1 of 6
DRAFT EOR APPROVAL ON 11/17/09
amend the Transportation element to include the Commute Trip Reduction Program, and a
change in land use designation.
• Because of the adoption of the Manette Sub-Area Plan and the annexation in the South
Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) as well as minor cartographic changes, the official Land Use
map needs to be updated to reflect the current land use within the City of Bremerton.
The City Services element of the Comprehensive Plan needs to be updated to include newly
adopted plans from other departments such as Water, Waste Water, and Parks. Amendments
��, ��4,
to this Comprehensive Plan element would include text to incorporate the new or updated
.�,� �,:�a,.
plans. Each plan section will also include an updated _,�20�10=`2015 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP). `'�`�'��'�"'
� �'��'��,�° a
,�� i�� j4 � ��
The Transportation element of the Comprehensive be updated to include text for the
newly adopted Non-Motorized Transportation`��Plan, the 201�0`�2015 Transportation
Improvement Program, and the Commute Trip�Reduction Program. s '�-'��' �'���,
�� ���� ���:�,�;r
h�n � �� ����
`���. =�'- ` ,���,_ ��.�,4
Larry Matel, Pnblic Works, Managing Engineer, ga�e�;;,an overview of�the�Stormwater
Management Plan Update. The last update to`tli'�s�plan;occurred in 1996. A Com rehensive
�:'' ;p -�.�:���� ��s P
Plan policy gives direction for the Stormwater 1Vlanagement Plan to seek natural drainage
��'�; ""` .. i.�i{�e'��a,
systems to deal with stormwatecn�(Low Impact Deve(op which this update addresses.
'-Sri'y �d ��„ '�^.�`Live'"�
The plan also documents existing�=conditions,�addressesl�tlie�,c�hanging regulatory environment,
outlines education and public inv,o�vein'ent��ide�ntifies illegal discharges to the drainage
system, and monitors stormwater impacts. Refernto�the meetirig''file for the complete updated
� ��,���_��.��",�y�,�
ES 1 w ti�t,' s ,n �.?:l c�C,
document. ,���=i��°` rh ��;� .�:���,� °3�"e;���
�r'�i�r�.?�,�';�� �aG_�; -,`'�-" Y�_,.;'�-�'
x �,� ,�;rG�;„ '�.���� �� '"
� ,���;,� `-L�;��;� �_U
� , , ��� �u
� Mike Mecham�=,�Pablic Works';1 City Engineer, reviewed the history and requirements of the
Commute Tr-`ip�Reduction (C.�T�R) program:��The intent of the program is to reduce the number
of single-passenger vehicles ;�qn Wthe�road 'asn well as the number of miles traveled, thus
� ..��� �r � ��,r`_vtG� �� :4�.�am� ;�',:�r`,�'
reducing, pollution�and roadycongestio��Bus�nesses with 100+ employees must participate in
.����_ _ � '`i°„'""'u.:�;� t�
the,�CT�R��program. Awcomplete copy of the" CTR can be found in the Planning Commission
"'�„ `�:`,tr uir`��r�i'^v�u.�u. '�.'-� �'..�
,�meeting file:-��,„��, ��s„�
-� �,�u,�;} . ,_, '
�=_ -�c°;�" w�..e�a?. "�;„�-�""�.
y � ��C�t� ��.—�'������4
'4 �i 4 � iJ.'i"��i�� {�
`�ti�:,�`Amendment #6 re`lates to a`��sli'ange in land use designation from Neighborhood Business
��1�,.� � � �.� �.�����
(NB) ` to Limited Com`mercial (LC) and would affect an area of approximately 6.6 acres
�� �,; ;;�
located�north of Kitsap�k;Way. This property was designated General Business (GB) prior to
'`,� • �
the 20'0�4�,� omprehens ���e Plan update and was the only site not changed from GB to LC
during the� comparison chart with requirements for General Business,
Neighborhood=�Business, and Limited Commercial illustrated the similarities between GB and
LC and how the�N�B designation limited commercial growth in that area.
Chairman Wheeler asked if there were any comments from citizens on this item.
Chuck Bair, Owner "Kitsap Lake Storage", 6400 Kitsap Way: "We're a neighboring
property to this land use designation change area. [Inaudible] Junction is a very vibrant area
— I don't know if you go out there much, but it's anchored, of course, by Ralph's Red Apple
and the Big Apple Diner. We've recently had Kitsap Lake Storage build out there; pretty
extensive complex. Been a brand new insurance building built on the old Lake Shore
Restaurant property and Affordable RV is now occupying, very successfully, the old fire hall
• behind the Big Apple Diner. So there's a lot of activity out there so we at Kitsap Lake
Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 2009 Page 2 of 6
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 11/17/09
Storage, we strongly support this land use designation change to Limited Commercial.
Thank you."
• Mark Nesby, 6720 Kitsap Way: "Members of the Planning Commission: Thank you for
this opportunity to address the commission regarding the proposed land use change from
Neighborhood Business to Commercial. My name is Mark Nesby, residing at 1295 Lakehurst
Drive. My wife and I have owned the Red Apple Market from 1977 until 2007 when we sold
the business to Glen Correll and Russell Fernandez, both who have been working at the store
since 1977. We continue to own the building and operate the $ig Apple Diner. In the 30
�,����
years we have been there, we have enlarged and remodeled se��e'ral times. We have served
r � Q�,�
the neighborhood and been supported by them very favorably:" The Comprehensive Plan
u date done in 2005 chan ed our existin zone from .,Busiriess General to Nei hborhood
P g g , �� ���,��' �-��.� �;.. g
Business making almost all existing businesses on the�north�``side�,of Kitsap Way into non-
conforming uses. The grocery store, at 15,000 square foot, is notaallowed in Neighborhood
Business as the largest building is limited to 5.;000''�square feet. Th'e",�{Big Apple Diner, at
�; i„�`��,�' + 'C�°�"�.�
3,500 square feet, is also not allowed; restaurants�'in that zone must be�no ularger than 2,500
square feet. Other businesses in the Kitsap sLake neighborhood have � issues. By
�,+;., �� ��„y �`��;�;
approving this rezone to Limited Commercial;�these existi`ng are pladed in a zone
�S; , �ti:w ����
where they can improve and flourish. There are�i's;eueral�,Une�.w buildings and businesses such as
�:�`'��,r-'�''_~,�`
Kitsap Lake Storage that have �improved the "a'rea�''�and we want to encourage existing
�,��,,, �^�,�a�li'
businesses and those still to come,=�to'u,pgrade and tliriue:, The intent of Limited Commercial,
'�� - r> '4��ciu:�
as stated in the 2005 Comprehensive�"�Plan�is: `to recogn�ize:�the community's existing general
� ;�n� "�'t��kCa•. - e�-�r,�
commercial districts outside of designated;��boundaries �o'r�'centers on lots zoned General
Business in the City, or an equivalentu designat on n�the co nty on December 1, 2004. The
Limited Commercial��zorie,��is not intencled .to �be eXpanded or applied to new properties or
� ,� ;��cw�'"ou+:c�`�,� _ +, ;.��. � y,_�y �
areas of the city�.�� We�would� like to thaiik�Arid'rea Spencer�'and the planning staff for working
� with the prope_'rty�owners to b"r�ing the existing land use in better compliance with the current
i er ; 1, (c,i t�t� �N7-'�.C`t.
zoning designat,ion. We enco�urage membe'r_'s�of the Commission to approve this request. On
��� G� � ��„ti� �„�;,a,
behalf of the `>lancl� ownersF�;and;�busi�nesses��;in the Kitsap Lake area, thank you for your
„ � n� r- �,� ;��� �T„�`=� _ �,_� � , �° �-
consideration. �'�"'-�, ���-� '���'''�"'- �, '-� ��'
<�.�,�� n ��. ,
,�:_���� ��,- �, ��,�_����;;�,�
,,,u,,,, �t�_c�,�s�',�, ��,
��„t���;�"�.rn �t� ra�s�� "�
�i��c''°�CS4i.�r,�+,4°C�''� ,�''�n' �
G�l"en Corr`ell-`6724 Kitsap�Way: "I'm the owner of Ralph's Red Apple Market along with
E n�, r
��� `;���ti.;i4'3,�'y'�` �"C�'3I3.�j'1" 7ni.�ri
'rny partner, Ru'ss'�Fernanclezsback there. We purchased the store almost two years ago now
`'e��� ;4 , '�' e7 �2,�'-'ci,+1 ,.
�;;�a'nd we ve been working there;,l Mark Nesby said, since the `70's. For our future, as the
ti �� 7 � r
c rent business owriees�there, and maybe someday owning the building and the land that it's
��u�;�:� �����
attached to, we would� like this land use designation changed in case, in the future, we, as
"�;, ��. . ��a;�
owners,,;might want some changes or extras to our business. Obviously, in this
��:,`�� �r.�m,�.n
economic�time, ev,er,y,body knows that a lot of businesses are not doing well. We, luckily, are
��c°� ��� ����� ��,t�
doing fairly�well±and��we would like to continue to do that. So we ask that you would approve
this change so''that''in the future we can continue to do well. Thank you."
Terry Lugar, 6610 Kitsap Way: "I'm the owner of Roy's Appliance Service in the Kitsap
Lake area. We would also be affected by the change and we would definitely like to see it go
to Limited Commercial. Our building also would be non-conforming under the current
zoning so it would greatly benefit us to [inaudible] Limited CommerciaL Thank you very
much."
Chairman Wheeler asked if there were any additional comments from the public. Seeing
none, he closed this portion of the meeting and moved on to Commission deliberation.
�
Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 2009 Page 3 of 6
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 11/17/09
It was suggested that each amendment be discussed and voted on individually.
Amendment #1: Adoption of the Official Land Use Map.
• No concerns/discussion on this item.
A motion was made by Commissioner Kosusko and seconded by Commissioner Hoell to
recommend to City Council to adopt Amendment #1 of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan
Amendments. Called for a vote. Commissioner Hoell: Yes; Commissioner Kosusko: Yes;
Commissioner Mosiman: Yes; Chairman Wheeler: Yes. The motion carried.
���`. y S
..�'C��
k t�t�?�' `- �f ,uk s')' t-!`
Amendment #2: Text amendments to the City Services eleme',n't:;and appendix.
.�,�,�„.
Commissioner Kosusko asked for clarification on what��fhe�(e�el of service would be for
^i�"�� ��`
citizens under the new Parks and Open Space plan. Wyn`4�`Birkenthal, Parks & Recreation
Director, explained that the Parks and Open Space�plan"can more s'pecifically lay out a level
of service for neighborhood and regional parks�as �that is a calcul'able, number, but other
� , ���• °ti ��
preserve areas did not have an available stand'ard�as a reference of levelyof;service. Andrea
n•J L Us•
S7aC"�apay" �";'�yi"^�
Spencer, Director of Community Development, added that what was in the'
Plan update was a reference to the Parks and Open Space�plan and not the coinplete detailed
�
document, just as the Transportation Plan�'and� Management Plan are
referenced and not included in their entirety. �������=`�
e� .� .�- ��.-�.�,
�� `��.�,.
�nELmet7 Cil3� '4,e.s1�;h
� .��. �ti�:
'Gk ��J�' 1 =A
Commission Mosiman commenfed`tliat�the,�information;�on page CS-36, which explained the
��.r���. -�,�-�,;,.�,� U;;� �.�
discrepancy of sewer system capac�ty�numbers�,based on info,�rmation the County and the City
reported, should remain. Staff wil'1���;add updated�,text to�the document to explain the
discrepancY• -��,-'':,;��,�;, ��,�� �,�,� ����r• ��,� ���
w � k a. �_ -- �°��,
ei�' , -"i�; �,,:',:,��, +`;-e?� o,-�_ • a, � t
h_-, ���.�y�;�,g-;,,:� ��;-��'?"..��:�.�° �;;F
�';`�;�';r�"' �t;�,.�'� ��cnc�+`�,'�5�'
� Referring to �,the�y,�/ater Capt,tal Improvecrient Plan (CIP), Commissioner Kosusko asked
what is planned�in 2015 that=�'w�ould cost $7r,�250,000.00. Mike Mecham said it is planned to
�°�-��
��� �.,� ,��,_�,,,:� �u�u�
construct two new�.�reservoir',s";=�one,�near Bremerton Airport and another in West Bremerton, to
'S+�i � y;,�T�.'..��
meet projected water�demands.�' Mosiman asked if purchasing additional
;,� ��,; '�qsa =-�,� ;�' ,r,�;
Iandi�forrfheF�watershe'd;�was included in tfie��CIP• Mr. Mecham said it was.
_r�"r"_i;L`_y�,'.`'Ln�,`,�:,„� '-"�:� ti,w�";���� �
rt�wM�a ��'' :;.,��� 7
� `�i=�s,��' '`�,::�i> � �'�-��'�'����
�=;�`�A'�motion was made by Commissioner Mosiman and seconded by Commissioner Hoell
•`�,7°� r,- �',�v,�-� ^��yx-,' t
'�3��to,recommend to City Council�,to adopt Amendment #2 of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan
_,,,� � , �
Amendments with `�' amendment to include explanatory language to page CS-36.
� °��� �-r�=��
Called�for a vote. Commissioner HoelL• Yes; Commissioner Kosusko: Yes; Commissioner
4n,�;.:� �. 'r`,�w,'i
Mosiman:w,Yes; Chairnian Wheeler: Yes. The motion carried.
;�� °�� 4� ��;� �7
��'�' � ��ti;��,� sr�'��';Y�
Amendment�#3:�LTert�amendments to the Transportation Element and Appendix.
�y;� �����
No concerns/d"iscussion on this item.
A motion was made by Commissioner Mosiman and seconded by Commissioner
Kosusko to recommend to City Council to adopt Amendment #3 of the 2009
Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Called for a vote. Commissioner Hoell: Yes;
Commissioner Kosusko: Yes; Commissioner Mosiman: Yes; Chairman Wheeler: Yes. The
motion carried.
Amendment #4: Amend Ciry Services Element and Appendix to include the 2008 Stormwater
Management Plan.
•
Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 2009 Page 4 of 6
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON l 1/17/09
Commissioner Kosusko noted he did not see a direct reference to the adopted Low Impact
Development technical manual in Amendment #4. Larry Matel explained that the City
Services Element contains a statement says the City will adhere to the standards of the
• Western Washington Stormwater Management manuaL The Western Washington
Stormwater Management manual requires the adoption the of equivalent [of LID].
Additionally, the LID technical manual has been adopted administratively by the Public
Works director.
Commissioner Hoell asked if any of the projects listed under Water Capital Improvements
t5��`��
were eligible for stimulus money. Mr. Matel explained that�;one of the requirements for
,G-�� — �-
stimulus funding of projects is to be "shovel ready" and t�he4.:�wrater projects are not ready to
begin at this time. �; ��;��;�
�, ;�� ,� ;}��:
����� � ��� �
�,;:��, �,��� t
A motion was made by Commissioner Kosusko and seconded�liy�C�ommissioner Hoell to
recommend to City Council to adopt Amendmerit #4 of the 2009;Comprehensive Plan
�i Y� i�'� . vt'e�:'�.
Amendments. Called for a vote. Commissioner;�HoelL• Yes; Commissioner Kosusko: Yes;
..� , �-� =���,��.,
Commissioner Mosiman: Yes; Chairman�Wlie�;eler: Yes. The motion carried:��
;��� '� ���
�_,�.� ,yt� : ���; aF. �.'��
{��� tCi�� m y
Amendment #5: Amend the Transportation Element to;�in'c-'lude the Commute Trip Reduction
-� _„� ,;,�, , � �-,
,��: �
(CTR) Program. a � =��r��,�n�=�;=��'
.� :�wc� -,���•
No concerns/discussion on thisa�item�although Cocnmissioner Kosusko expressed pleasure
,,,.,�, �, �.i�
� �-�-�°,r•�. � �?',�
for moving forward with a plan tha�;�fur"thers�our city's `�e�o�,l.�ving".
�,.,_ ��h_ n � „� � �
t �',_.�, , �-"�';� ; �=1`:��, "'—`-"+:
���: �. . �;"��y� � ;t��s � `�'�"
A motion was made by Commissioner Kosusko. and �seconded by Commissioner
Mosiman to recommend�to City�w�Council��f�`to "�'adopt��.Amendment #5 of the 2009
.
Comprehensive;�P a �'�Amendments: �� for a vote. Commissioner Hoell: Yes;
• ~ t��n'�Y" `:= �tS'7tiL�,a �
Commissioner„ryKosusko: Yes;� Mosiman: Yes; Chairman Wheeler: Yes. The
motion carried�'�� '��'� �'"�"�
� dt�'u�''�,��`�W�`� i ;�'�=�,
� ci`n � �rcl�� � i:e_�
�S?,d^�* f EL, �CiY �T.t�' �'r.. .� W,�.
Amendment #6: Ch'ange�`inyL
.�-��-� �� � ; _=� ��y ��:�,,�r� �:c�
Becauses�'an�r,Limited�;�,Commercial zone'��cannot be located within a designated center,
*3�f�i-aJ�'�'�'"`.i`�"�?�' , � �i�''� is�
Commissioner=Kosusko=�was concerned that the "Reserve Center" designation would need to
t,.., ,
,._; �Sbe'�removed from�the proposed change site before it could be redesignated. Andrea
��� ,
, « "�-.�.;r � , �� �._„
��explained that wHen�the area�,��was given a reserve center designation, it was with the
�� u u=i; , � � s� ��:
knowledge that the area needed� attention in the form of zoning but it could wait until the
yy ��,�� �==��,
2025;�C„�,omprehensive P�an update to make those changes and the reserve centers were noted
as areas�to,.look at first zwhen developing sub-area plans. In the interim, commercial activity
in this north�Kitsap Way neighborhood has continued to grow and planning staff has created
,��
�n����-�,�, �,,,����,
new types of;centers�that are not neighborhood centers, so a land use designation of Limited
Commercial o'�uld be appropriate for this area.
A motion was made by Commissioner Hoell and seconded by Commissioner Mosiman
to recommend to City Council to adopt Amendment #6 of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan
Amendments as defined in Attachment F. Called for a vote. Commissioner Hoell: Yes;
Commissioner Kosusko: Yes; Commissioner Mosiman: Yes; Chairman Wheeler: Yes. The
motion carried. ,
A motion was made by Commissioner Mosiman and seconded by Commissioner Hoell
to recommend that City Council adopt the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan as
• detailed in Attachment I, based on the Findings & Conclusions in Attachment II with
Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 2009 Page 5 of 6
DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 11/17/09
the amendment of language on page CS-36. Called for a vote. Commissioner Hoell: Yes;
Commissioner Kosusko: Yes; Commissioner Mosiman: Yes; Chairman Wheeler: Yes. The
motion carried.
•
Chairman Wheeler closed the Public Hearing.
VI. Business Meeting
ti
• - •�;�;;�.
A. Chairman's Report: None. ��
�°�=�'
��"'�'-�'
ti���
B. Director's Reuort: Andrea Spencer reported that�tlie�wDepartment of Community
G'����� � h��-
Development has received a$200,000 grant from the; State to:conduct its Shoreline Master
�f,� �;r:�.
Program update. DCD has chosen Parametrix from�_a of five appl�cants as the consultant
and the update is to be completed by 2012. Staff�lias been using alternate forms of public
outreach such as Twitter, blogs, BKAT programs�' an information tio'otii�at the Blackberry
Festival. � `"�� ���`�''
� �� �
���� �� �-���
��;°��;,. . �-�� `�''�=��'
There is continued planning on the east bridge�;l_'andingaof t(ie new Manette Bridge. WSDOT
has indicated there will be room for a round-aboutawliich will open up additional park space
w �-�.
but the plan has not yet been forinalized. "'�����;
�;;�m :��-� �,� �"���.�`°�
, �. ° '�:� � ,�..
;-`'3°t, `�°=�'a` °,,, �r�
Zoning code amendments are scheduled�fo`r-��Council°`�adoption on October 21, 2009.
`��w�� ,c���;.-��,� ���,�,�,,
Comprehensive Plan amendments are;scheduled�Tfor�adoption;on November 4, 2009.
cia*L � pii. ,� e.r,�`'�u4lH'3�v�'s3C+`.0 <y7
i��' "' "°"" `'!� ` �C'cL.�,�,'�, u�:� a�'`=�.'_�� �^'=�ii?'r��" `�"�'4u
�`u �` e'l'�n±+�,�. Y-"a d��'„-� , �c�= �yx
C. Old Business: Non`e�" "'" `�� "� � `�`'
�-r . 3''��
' 3 �`�"� . c�� `.. "� , u �yu ��' �a �
• ;r' �_;u_ " �',.R
"�i �� `; t �[tt l
�.�`� ��'.�: f' ;�;�? �''��`C�
D. New Busines's: �� �;°� S,
-��4 t_'_-� �� n����
'���-��=. _c��.a�_ �b
,� .,�:c, 3��a ; �,,,. �v
'�5'�'�° ra,, _w�,��. y ,,
c, 'i a ; �wF�, u "N``o_a., 's,�
�'�`a'a�`�"��.r�����'-'� �-.,a,VI'I:'�'�`-��AiC�]QUCRII]@Ilt
� q �!'s;�^. ti�j�r ,, w�v�7'"' `Sa'4�E'Y6..
�-i �'�'�' a'� `�r�;�y,� s�,�;,n,�:
�k'.��:+;ti���:'"^�-y��,',��a��,.F ' �i'��`"�.
Meeting�,was ad�ourned at,6:53'p°�in��The next Regular Meeting is scheduled for October 20, 2009.
����� �= i���� =1°�c�c.
a�
;�,_. . �:u 4�,e4 e�7> '=.�cr��s
Respectfully submitted by. "`� ��°�_��_
-'r'3 �` 5. i ' '�'u �.y�
�i
�. n ,�''.'�` a,� � ` �;�
��`,�'_',"y�.:� �, �`i 1
," '� � �� �
`4`��,�,�� ��,��
Andrea L. Spenc"er;�Executi�e;,Secretary
� ����-,-. �� a� ;;
- �x,u� � �
�i'��,��,,� ,����
' �s ,Y,;�,���,�
� ���
�
Approved by:
Greg Wheeler, Chairman
•
Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 2009 Page 6 of 6
ti
(�
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Accotmt # 42742 AD# 254760
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KITSAP
I, Laura Wessels, bemg first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That she is now, and at all times
embraced m the publication herem mentioned was the principal clerk of tlle printers and publishers of
KITSAP SLJN; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court
of the County of Kitsap, in wh�ch County it is published and is now and has been for more than s�x months
prior to the date of the publicat�on heremafter referred to, published m the English language continually as
a daily newspaper in Bremerton, Kitsap County, Washington, a weekly newspaper in Kitsap County,
Washmgton and is now and during all of said time, was pnnted in an office maintained in the aforesaid
place of publication of said newspaper; that the following is a true text of an advertisement as it was
published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said newspaper on the following date, to wit: A
November 9, 2009 and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said
period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $60.30. This
amount has not been paid in full.
���a►►��u�u�u�,,�
(Signature of Principal Clerk) ����` �. S�Ty� ,,'�
ti'" � '�,�
Subscribed and swom to before me this day of December 3, 2009. _` '. M��,P�� � z
:�i; `'~ �� _
: s�;?��IIC r
f �
:, �` p� �9 ��;
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Kitsap County. ' '��,,��� j
' ���/!tlltlntt�l� e`\
ORDINANCE NO. 5094
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending the
Comprehensive Plan, as follows: Amend the Land Use Map to reflect cartographic updates; update the City
Services Element and Appendix integrating applicable plans previously adopted and the 2010-2015 Capital
Improvement Program; update the Transportation Element and Appendix to reference the Non-Motorized
Transportation Plan and inclusion of the 2010-2015 Transportation Improvement Program; amend the City
Services Element and Appendix to adopt the new 2008 Stormwater Management Plan Update; amend
Transportation Element to adopt die Commute Trip Reduction Program and; change land use designations
for a portion of the Kitsap Lake Reserve Center from Neighborhood Business to L'united Commercial.
Passed by the City Council the 4th day of November, 2009.
T'he full text of this ordinance is available from the City Clerk's Office, 345 Sixth Street, Suite 600,
Bremerton, WA 98337.
November 9, 2009 .....................AD #20094187