Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4857
Contract Number: 4857 Vendor PARAMETRIX, INC Subject. PSA - Shoreline Master Program Update Department Comm Devel File Class LEG 12 -1 Begin Date. 10/20/2009 End Date: 12/31/2013 Review Date 8/1/2013 Vault Date: Comments Amendment #1 4 -4 -12, Amendment #2 1/2/13, Amendment #3 7/9/13 i i 1 i 1 I THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton first entered into a Professional Services contract for professional services for the Shoreline Master Program Update with Parametrix, Inc (Consultant) on October 20, 2009, and first amended on April 4, 2012 and second amended on January 2, 2013 and WHEREAS, the Consultant work products have been substantially completed in accordance the original scope of work, and WHEREAS, the Second Amendment extend services through December 13, 2013, but did not include amendment to compensation as the parties had intended WHEREAS, in the Second Amendment, the parties intended to increase the compensation to the Consultant by $10,000 NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual consideration, the City and Parametrix, Inc agree to amend the contract between them as follows 1. On page 1, Section III. Compensation: the amount of compensation is increased $10,000 from $109,986 to $119,986 00 3. Scope remains as stated in the original contract and all related amendments 4. Schedule remains as stated to the original contract and all related amendments 5. Fee Schedule remains as stated in the original contract and all related amendments All remaining provisions in the Professional Services contract shall remain in full force and effect except as expressly modified by this amendment IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below, being authorized to execute this agreement, enter into this agreement on the date and year indicated PARAMETRI�4 INC. THE CITY OF BREMERTON B s ra'r ��'� , By PATl LENT Date f'" 13 Date Bremerton/Parametrix, Inc Addendum - SMP Contract Number- 4857 Vendor PARAMETRIX, INC Subject PSA - Shoreline Master Program Update Department Comm Devel File Class. LEG 12 -1 Begin Date: 10/20/2009 End Date 12/31/2013 Review Date 8/1/2013 Vault Date Comments Amendment #1 4 -4 -12, Amendment #2 1/2/13 i s SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton first entered into a Professional Services contract for professional services for the Shoreline Master Program Update with Parametrix, Inc (Consultant) on October 20, 2009 and first amended on April 4, 2012 and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the contract to extend the term of this Agreement to December 31, 2013. All remaining provisions in the Professional Services contract shall remain in full force and effect except as expressly modified by this amendment IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below, being authorized to execute this agreement, enter into this agreement on the date and year indicated PARAMETRIX, INC. THE CITY OF BREMERTON C� By �� Vvt v l�er By LI L - t4 r Its —� l/. Its �nRyO r Date: lZ 12 1 iZ Date: Bremerton /Parametrix, Inc Addendum 2 - SMP Contract Number. 4857 Vendor: PARAMETRIX, INC Subject: Consultant - Shoreline Master Program Update Department Comm Devel File Class: LEG 12 -1 Begin Date: 10/20/2009 End Date: 12/31/2012 Review Date: 8/1/2012 Vault Date. Comments: Amendment 4 -4 -12 1 AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton first entered into a Professional Services contract for professional services for the Shoreline Master Program Update with Parametrix, Inc (Consultant) on October 20, 2009, and WHEREAS, the Consultant work products have been substantially completed in accordance the original scope of work, and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the contract to continue the general provisions and add to the scope and schedule to extend services through the Shoreline Master Plan Update adoption process, and WHEREAS, the compensation to the Consultant shall be increased $10,000 NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual consideration, the City and Parametrix, Inc agree to amend the contract between them as follows 1. On page 1, Section H. Term: Exhibit B (Schedule) is revised per Addendum Exhibit B, attached 2. On page 1, Section III. Compensation: the amount compensation is increased $10,000 from $99,986 to $109,986 3. Exhibit A (Scope) is revised per Addendum Exhibit A, attached 4. Exhibit B (Schedule) is revised per Addendum Exhibit B, attached 5. Exhibit C (Fee Schedule) is revised per Addendum Exhibit C, attached All remaining provisions in the Professional Services contract shall remain in full force and effect except as expressly modified by this amendment IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below, being authorized to execute this agreement, enter into this agreement on the date and year indicated PARAMETRIX, INC. THE CITY OF BREMERTON ---- - I -/- I ." a /- By By /t- t ANT its. its* O Date / 6 2 Date A9 Bremerton/Parametnx, Inc Addendum - SMP F I EXHIBIT A — ADDENDUM TO SCOPE OF WORK 2 City of Bremerton 3 Shoreline Master Program 4 OVERVIEW OF AMENDED SCOPE OF WORK 5 The goal of this addendum to the scope of work is to provide additional resources to City Staff in the 6 review and adoption process for the proposed Shoreline Master Program update 7 All consultant work products have been substantially completed in accordance with the original project 8 scope of work This amendment continues all general provision of the existing scope and adds additional 9 resources to assist in Phase 5, the Local SMP Adoption Process 10 The consultant services for Phase 5 were limited to attendance and meetings and provision of technical 11 input and evaluation limited to the hourly budget provided The resources allocated have been 12 substantially expended City staff desires additional consultant assistance in this phase of work 13 Anticipated Services 14 PHASE 5: LOCAL SMP ADOPTION PROCESS 15 Consultant services 16 • Attend additional Planning Commission and City Council Workshops and Public hearings and 17 provide presentation and technical input as assigned by city staff 18 • Provide city staff with technical input an evaluation of additional policy and code options that are 19 identified during public workshops and public hearing before the Planning Commission and City 20 Council 21 • Make revisions to designation maps and other exhibits to reflect code options 22 • Provide additional assistance coordinating review of said concept by Ecology 23 • Provide additional assistance coordinating review of other agencies and Tribes 24 • Make revisions to the Inventory, Cumulative Impacts Analysis and No Net Loss Report if 25 warranted by additional policy and code options 26 Budget Ten thousand dollars ($10,000) Bremerton/ParameMcy, Inc Addendum SMP Exhibit A EXHIBIT B ADDENDUM MILESTONES /DELIVERABLES PLAN DATE Monthly progress reports to Bremerton Beginning of each month Shoreline jurisdiction memo and preliminary maps — draft 10/20/2009 Public Participation Plan draft 10/20/2009 Review of existing SMP — draft memo 10/2012009 SMP checklist to Ecology (Bremerton) 10/31/2009 Inventory and charactenzation — data sources, preliminary map folio 1/27/2010 Inventory and characterization — Revised FINAL 2/25/2010 Inventory and characterization analysis - Inventory Characterization Report 5/21/2010 SMP checklist to Ecology (Bremerton) 5/31/2010 Inventory and characterization analysis - Revision respond to Ecology 10/262010 Inventory and characterization analysis - Additional Revision 12/072010 Community goals, policies, regulations, designations — First Tech Memo 07/21//2010 Community goals, policies, regulations, designations — 2 nd Tech Memo 09/14//2010 Community goals, policies, regulations, designations — 3rd Tech Memo 10/07//2010 Community goals, policies, regulations, designations — 4th Tech Memo 01/032012 Community goals, policies, regulations, designations — First Draft 02/152011 Community goals, policies, regulations, designations — 2 nd Submittal 02/042011 Community goals, policies, regulations, designations — 3rd Submittal 05/172011 Community goals, policies, regulations, designations — 4 n Submittal 06/06//2011 Cumulative effects analysis and NNL report- First Draft 12/082011 Cumulative effects analysis and NNL report- 2 nd Draft 12/312011 Cumulative effects analysis and NNL report- 3` Draft 021272012 SMP checklist to Ecology (Bremerton) 03/072012 Restoration Plan- First Draft 12/152011 Restoration Plan- 2 nd Draft 12/302011 Restoration Plan- 3` Draft 02/282012 SMP checklist to Ecology (Bremerton) 03/072012 SEPA checklist 03/072012 Local adoption process (SEPA review, 60 -day GMA notice, public meeting, 03/142012 adopt SMP and submit to Ecology) — primarily Bremerton deliverable Assistance with Public Meetings To 12/31/2012 Assistance with Response to Comments To 12/312012 Assistance with Code Revisions To 12/31/2012 Revision if required to Inventory/ CEA/Restorabon Plan To 12/31/2012 Bremerton/Parametnx, Inc Addendum — SMP Exhibit B Bremerton SMP Exhibit C Addendum Parametnx, Inc 411 108th Avenue NE, Suite 1800 Bellevue WA 88004 201212013 201212013 2012/2013 201212013 Direct Labor Overhead Fixed Fee All Inclusive Hourly PMX Salary Rates 18584% 3000% Billing Rate Grade Low NTE NTE Low NTE Low NTE Low NTE 1 -7 Technician 709 2377 2496 1389 4888 213 749 2310 81.32 8 Junior Planner /Scientist 1482 2641 2773 2902 5431 445 8.32 4829 90.36 9 Specialist 1647 2935 3082 3225 6035 494 925 5367 100.42 10 Planner /Scientist 1 1829 3261 3424 3582 6706 549 1027 5960 11157 11 Planner /Scientist 2 2033 3623 3804 3981 7450 610 1141 6624 12395 12,13 Planner /Scientist 3 2259 4450 4673 4424 9151 678 1402 7361 15225 14 Planner /Scientist 4 27.33 4919 5165 5352 10115 820 1549 8905 16829 15, 16, Senior Planner /Scientist 3006 6644 6976 5887 13662 902 2093 9795 227.31 17 18,19 Program Manager 4001 81.17 8523 7836 166.91 1200 2557 130.37 27771 20 Corporate Manager 4842 10000 10500 9483 20563 1453 31.50 157.77 342.13 Invoiced costs may be less than the low rate shown per lob classification but cannot exceed the NTE rate per lob classification Bremerton/Parametrix, Inc Addendum — SMP — Exhibit C Contract Number: Vendor: Subject: Department: File Class: Begin Date: End Date: Review Date: Vault Date: 4857 fi��:i,�'uiall��ii:1 Consultant - Shoreline Master Program Update Comm Devel LEG 12-1 10/20/2009 10/31/2011 08/O1/2011 Comments : . .� a PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT � Shoreline Master Program Update The City of Bremerton ("City") and Parametrix ("Consultant"), referred to collectively as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services: I. Scope: The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the Scope of Work, dated August 2009, including any attachments thereto, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be modified only pursuant to Section VII.G. of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides for unspecified additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express written request of the City. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such services are performed. II. Term: The City and the Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work described in Exhibit A is to be completed as provided for in the work schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B; provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable delays or extra work as provided for in section IX (A) of this agreement. III. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the City shall pay Consultant in an amount not to exceed $99,986. Consultant's charges and bills shall conform to the fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. The Consultant shall submit regular billing statements detailing work performed and amount charged on each task or portion thereof. The descriptions shall conform to and fall within the categories set out in the Scope of Work and/or Fee Schedule. Upon receipt of a conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to prioritize scoped work and accelerate and/or delay work tasks under the time frame set forth in Section II herein. The Consultant's labor rates and billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibit C. Consultant shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in accordance with Exhibit C. If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold payment until the statement is brought into compliance. Such withholding does not relieve Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement. Bremerton/Parametrix Shoreline Master Program Update Page 1 of 6 IV. Relationship of Parties: Consultant represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its field of expertise. Consultant and its personnel are independent Consultants and not employees of the City. Consultant and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the City's employees and other Consultants. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-Consultants of the Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub-Consultants during the performance of this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent Consultants to perform the same or similar work. As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management. The City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of managerial control over Consultant or its personnel. As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for payment of all taxes and licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State professional licensing, and City business licensing. If any taxes or fees due the City have been declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges arising from the delinquency, from any payments due Consultant. V. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's sole negligence. The City's review or acceptance of any of the work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Bremerton/Parametrix Shoreline Master Program Update Page 2 of 6 VI. Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-Consultants. Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing: 1. Automobile Liabilitv insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and 2. Commercial General Liabilitv insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general aggregate far personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's liability; and 3. Excess Liabilitv insurance with limits not less than 1,000,000 limit per occurrence and aggregate. 4. Professional Liabilitv insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence/claim. Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the Consultant. All required policies shall be provided on an "occurrence" basis except professional liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a"claims-made" basis. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of an endorsement that is acceptable to the City, which names the City as an additional insured shall be attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies and endorsements. The City further reserves the right to reject any unacceptable policies and/or endorsements. The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability. The Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage. The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason, proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as evidence of coverage. Bremerton/Parametrix Shoreline Master Program Update Page 3 of 6 VII. General Conditions: A. Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Consultant shall furnish periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Consultant shall maintain accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to substantiate all billed amounts. B. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents: Original documents, drawings, designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise. All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored at Consultant's office in Bremerton, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents, and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing, modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the City upon its request, and at reasonable cost. All documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software or other items prepared or furnished by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments of service with respect to the project and are the property of the City. Any reuse by the City for other than the specific purpose intended will be at City's sole risk. C. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk: Consultant shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub-consultants in the performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose. All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the work. D. Place of Work: The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this Agreement at its offices in Bellevue, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at locations mutually agreed upon by the parties. E. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement. Bremerton/Parametrix Shoreline Master Program Update Page 4 of 6 F. Severabilitv: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. G. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by both Parties. H. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1 st class mail, or by personal service, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. City Address JoAnn Vidinhar City of Bremerton 345 6 Street, Suite 600 Bremerton WA 98337 Consultant Address Jan Cassin Parametrix 411 108 Avenue NE, Ste 1800 Bellevue WA 98004 I. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be deemed waiver of any other right or power. J. Non-Waiver of Breach: The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. K. Compliance with Laws: Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement. L. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court. M. Attornevs' Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attorney's fees. N. Assi�nment: Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without the written consent of the City shall be void. VIII. Nondiscrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate in employment or services to the public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, disability, or sexual orientation except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification. IX. Termination: This Agreement shall remain in force until completion and acceptance of the services, terminated by written instrument upon mutual consent, or by the City of Bremerton for convenience. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a Party if the Bremerton/Parametrix Shoreline Master Program Update Page 5 of 6 other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party, and the non- performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within thirty (30) days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Any Notice by Consultant shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work current through the termination date. If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement. A. Excusable Delavs: The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials, equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2) any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement, the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay. B. Ri�hts Upon Termination: In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. CITY OF BREMERTON �� ��������� By: C'� c � l l`'t rC�; ►� n�e // .�� �' � its: Date: / �� / � PARAMETRIX I �i . By: (��CL� M . �, its: � �i�n� Date: ���-19 0� Attest: es Agreement Form (2003).doc i � __' . 2�� . __ . . � _.. •- � � Bremerton/Parametrix Shoreline Master Program Update Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENT A— SCOPE OF WORK City of Bremerton Shoreline Master Program 4 OVERVIEW OF SCOPE OF WORK 5 The goal of this scope of work is to clearly describe the tasks necessary to complete the City of 6 Bremerton Shoreline Master Program update by February 2012. This scope specifies tasks to be 7 completed by the Parametrix team (hereafter Consultant) as well as specific tasks to be completed by 8 Bremerton staf£ The scope of work includes 5 phases, with individual tasks. The scope includes goals, 9 approach, deliverables and assumptions for each task and serves as the basis for the associated budget 10 cost estimate. 11 Assuinptions Applicable to all Plzase.s and Tasks: 12 • The Consultant will provide deliverables to the City in electronic format. Unless otherwise 13 specified, deliverables will be in PDF, Microsoft Word or Microsoft Excel. 14 • The City will have the primary responsibility for implementing the Public Participation plan with 15 assistance, as specified, from the Consultant. The city will be responsible for identifying and 16 coordinating with key stakeholders, including property owners, state agencies, tribes, and 17 neighboring jurisdictions. Unless otherwise specified under specific phases and tasks, the City 18 will produce and print paper reports, memos, agendas etc. as needed, for agency, public Planning 19 Commission and City Council review. For all public, committee, and other meetings, the City 20 will be responsible for scheduling, notice, text, reports and records of ineetings. The City will 21 prepare meeting exhibits unless included in specific Consultant deliverables. 22 • The City will e-mail all Consultant deliverables in electronic file to the Ecology project officer. 23 The city shall track all Ecology, agency and public comments and shall maintain a record of 24 written response as required by the Grant Agreement. The City and Consultant will jointly 25 develop a matrix format for comments and responses to enable Consultant responses to be readily 26 integrated into the City's overall records. 27 • For review comments on deliverables including Technical Reports and Draft Code text, the City 28 will collate comments and resolve conflicts among reviewers. One set of comments containing 29 all comments by reviewers will be provided to the Consultant in a tracking matrix of comments 30 and responses in MS Word or Excel format. The City will request clarification of the individual 31 reviewer for comments that are unclear or ask questions. If issues are technical in nature, the 32 Consultant will directly contact individual reviewers to discuss comments and clarify issues 33 within the constraints of the budget. The consultant will track comments and responses in a 34 matrix format developed by the consultant and Bremerton staff. 35 • For each deliverable, the Consultant will prepare one draft and one �nal version, except if 36 otherwise specified. This means there will be two (2) opportunities (total) for the City and 37 Ecology and other agencies to comment. The first review will be comprehensive and will raise 38 all substantive issues. The second review is to confirm that the responses adequately address the 39 comments from the first review. No additional substantive comments will be raised in the second 40 review. If needed, the Consultant will revise the final deliverable if there are specific issues 41 where reviewers believe the Consultant responses did not adequately address reviewer's issues Crry of Br�ernertaz SMP Update 1 ��8'��'��y Scope of Work 42 and will be limited to specific issues identified. Review by Ecology is presumed to take place for 43 each of the work products. If Ecology review is not timely, the City will determine whether to 44 proceed without input (or with incomplete input) or adjust the schedule. 45 46 47 • Consultant will provide the City with one hard copy and one electronic copy of all deliverables. • The schedule for deliverables to the City in this scope assumes Consultant will receive City comments on draft deliverables within one week of submitting the draft to the City. 48 • The exact level of assistance that the City will need on public involvement is difficult to predict; 49 City and Consultant will re-visit assumptions about public involvement and refine tasks during 50 scoping meetings throughout the proj ect — initially following completion of the Public 51 Participation Plan, and then at the beginning of new Phases to adjust specific tasks as needed. For 52 this scope, Consultant assistance and/or participation in public involvement meetings (including 53 meeting with Planning Commission and City Council) are specified under individual tasks. 54 Consultant will budget for these meetings based on hourly rates for staff participation; if 55 additional assistance is needed for public involvement tasks, Consultant and City will revisit and 56 adjust allocation of resources to meet those needs. 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 .: .� • The scope assumes that the City will have the primary responsibility of integrating work produced for the SMP update into the City GIS system. At the beginning of the project, the City will provide Consultant with information needed to support compatibility of the GIS products for the SMP update with system standards and long-term use by the City. GIS mapping for the SMP update will be completed by the Consultant, consistent with those standards to the extent possible given the project budget. GIS data layers used in the analysis by the Consultant will be created or obtained from existing data sources including the City, Kitsap County, WDNR, Ecology, WDFW and other agencies. Analysis performed by the Consultant will include coordination with the City to obtain necessary data and will include transmittal of the results of the analysis to the city to be integrated with the GIS system. Consultant will produce GIS maps for the Technical Reports and SMP Reports. • Meetings are assumed to occur at the Norm Dicks Oftice building, other locations within the City of Bremerton or at the Consultant's offices in Bremerton, or at Ecology offices in Bellevue. 70 • The City will prepare the SMP Submittal Checklists and provide these to Ecology. 71 • Actions by the City or Ecology that cause schedule delay will be considered out of scope and inay 72 result in a concomitant delay in the number of days that the Consultant deliverables are due. 73 Review of Consultant work products by Ecology or other agencies is a key component of the 74 project that is not under the control of the City or Consultant. The City will be responsible far 75 tracking Ecology and agency comments and determining whether to proceed on project elements 76 if agency input is incomplete. 77 TASK A: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION 78 Project management tasks will be on-going during the project and include coordination with the Ciry and 79 Ecology (as needed); mana�ing and tracking scope, schedule, and budget status; quality assurance/quality 80 control of deliverables; and progress reports and regular communications with the City. Ciry of Br�emerton SMP Upclate 2 08-28-09 Scope of Work 81 Goals and Objectives 82 Maintain constant and thorough coinmunications with City staff to maximize teamwork and productivity 83 while minimizing rework. Maintain control of the project scope, budget, and schedule. Provide quality 84 service and products to the City of Bremerton. 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 Project Management tasks will address: • The relationships among the Consultant team, City staff, and Ecology will be defined and detailed in a Project Management Plan including protocols for coordination on substantive issues, review of draft products, schedule and budget tracking and an understanding of how the project team will respond to unanticipated change. Approacli Coordinate with City and manage work of the Consultant team: • Prepare a Project Management Plan to guide performance of the work, communications, change management, and scope, schedule and budget management. • Hold frequent team meetings (weekly during active phases of the proj ect) to coordinate schedule requirements and review technical problems and other matters of significance to the progress of the work. Coordinate project documentation, including the following: • Prepare necessary project correspondence, letters, memos, meeting minutes, etc., to support the project work. Maintain a central file for written materials. 100 • Provide all Technical Memoranda and Draft Code text to the city in MS Word format. 101 Coordinate with Bremerton Staff on all aspects of project completion, including the following: 102 • Prepare and submit monthly progress billings to the City 103 104 105 • Provide additional identification of issues and proposed solutions if unforeseen issues arise • Keep a log of Consultant team contact with Ecology, other agencies and the public, and transmit cc's of emails and other correspondence to the Bremerton Project Manager 106 Deliverables 107 • Project Management Plan (Phase 1); Updated Plan at beginning of subsequent Phases. 108 109 110 111 112 113 • Monthly progress reports. The monthly report, addressing progress of the work shall include, as appropriate: ■ A summary of actual versus scheduled cost ■ A summary of actual versus scheduled progress ■ A narrative to define unanticipated issues, responsive action requirements by the Consultant and City 114 • Additional progress reports or identification of unanticipated issues as needed Ciry of Bremer•ton SMP Update 3 O8-?g-0> Scope of Work 115 Assu�nptions 116 117 f�E:3 � Meetings with City of Bremerton staff will be held by phone when possible and to the extent possible, will be scheduled on days when other meetings are scheduled. • City of Bremerton staff will determine the staff from the City that will participate in all meetings. 119 • City of Bremerton staff will provide all logistical support for public, agency, and Planning 120 Commission meetings including scheduling, notice, sending out agendas, designating meeting 121 rooms, tracking attendance, taking the official meeting notes, and sending out meeting minutes or 122 summaries to all participants for review and finalizing meeting records. Exhibits to be prepared 123 by the Consultant are indicated as deliverables in each task below. 124 • The duration of contract is September 2009 through February 2012. Delays due to unforeseen 125 circumstances may result in additional effort necessary for project management and 126 administration. 127 PHASE 1: SHORELINE JURISDICTION, REVIEW OF EXISTING SMP, AND PUBLIC 128 PARTICIPATION PLAN 129 (Ecology Grant Agreement Tasks l.l and 1.2) 130 Goals and Objectives 131 This is the initial, key collaborative step that establishes the boundaries of shoreline jurisdiction and the 132 areas that wi11 be included in the SMP update, reviews the existing program to identify needs, and l33 establishes the structure for working closely with stakeholders throughout the project. 134 The objectives of this Phase are (1) to identify the areas under shoreline jurisdiction and prepare draft 135 maps of the areas to be included in the City of Bremerton's (City) SMP update; (2) conduct a preliminary 136 review of the City's existing SMP; and (3) prepare the Public Participation Plan that will guide the public 137 involvement process. 138 Task 1.1: 139 Approach 140 Subtask 1.1 a 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 Preliminary Shoreline Jurisdiction Maps and Review of Existing Program This subtask will define the geographic boundaries and scope of the shoreline update and produce preliminary shoreline jurisdiction maps. This step will identify shoreline jurisdiction consistent with the requirements of RCW 90.58.030(2) — Shorelines of Statewide Significance and Shorelands; including: • Marine shorelines • Rivers and streams with mean annual flow over 20 cfs • Lakes and reservoirs greater than 20 acres • Wetlands associated with these areas • Lands within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) • All or part of floodplains landward of the 200-foot mark froin the floodway • Buffers necessary for the protection of critical areas under the Growth Management Act (GMA) • Shorelines in future annexation areas or unincorporated Urban Growth Areas • Floodways, and floodplain areas 200 feet landward of the OHWM Gry of 6r�eme� ton SMP Update 4 Scope of Work OS-?8-09 153 Satbtask 1.1 b 154 A gap analysis will be conducted to review and identify where the existing shoreline program is 155 consistent (or not) with current guidelines and regulations for SMPs, including regarding best available 156 science requirements under the GMA. Tlus analysis will identify specific issues that need to be addressed 157 in updating shoreline goals, policies, regulations, and environmental designations. 158 Assumptions 159 • This SMP update will include the area within the current City boundaries and two areas 160 planned for future annexation by the City of Bremerton: the South Kitsap Industrial Area 161 and the Gorst lower watershed area. 162 • The City will provide Parametrix with maps showing the boundaries of future annexation 163 areas to be included in the SMP update. 164 • Review of the existing SMP will include a review of the 2006 proposed amendments. 165 • The City will submit the Draft Preliminary Shoreline Jurisdiction Maps to Ecology. 166 Consultant Deliverables Task 1.1 167 • For Subtask 1.1 a: a set of draft maps showing the preliminary boundaries of shoreline 168 jurisdiction based on existing data related to the presumed location of the ordinary high 169 water mark and associated wetlands with the understanding that precise delineation of 170 shoreline jurisdiction requires site-specific evaluation. A Technical Memorandum 171 reviewing criteria for Shoreline Management Act jurisdiction used to identify the 172 shoreline jurisdictional boundaries, and identifying any changes required to existing City 173 jurisdictional maps. Draft delivered to Bremerton Staf£ September 16, 2009; Final 174 delivered to Bremerton Staff on September 28, 2009 (Assuming review comments 175 received from City by September 21, 2009). (Ecology Task 1.1 Ecology due date 176 September 30, 2009). 177 • For Subtask l.lb: a Technical Memorandum describing the results of the gap analysis 178 with recommendations for specific issues to be addressed, or information that needs to be 179 included in the SMP update. Delivered to Bremerton Staff September 25, 2009. 180 Brerizerton Deliverables Task 11 181 • Submit Draft Shoreline Jurisdiction Maps to Ecology (Due September 30, 2009). 182 Task 1.2: Public Participation Plan 183 (Ecology Grant Agreement Task 1.2) 184 Goal and Objectives 185 Provide a Public Participation Plan (Plan) that can guide the public involvement process throughout the 186 SMP update. 187 Approach Crtv of Bremer�on SMP Update 5 08-38-09 Scope of Wovk 188 A Public Participation Plan will be prepared that identifies specific objectives, key parties, property 189 owners, state agencies, tribes, neighboring jurisdictions and established timelines for citizen participation 190 activities. Efforts will be made to include recreationists/conservationists and organiz�tions tllat may not 191 typically seek involvement in new shoreline regulations. The plan will identify appropriate means of 192 participation for key stakeholders. Various methods can be employed for different groups ranging from 193 public meetings and workshops that involve a broad cross-section of the public to direct notification to 194 affected property owners, newsletter articles, website posting, news releases, legal notices, document 195 circulation, public workshops and hearings. 196 A detailed outline of the Public Participation Plan will be included in the Project Management/Work Plan, 197 to include preliminary identifcation of stakeholders, outreach plan and preliminary schedule, 198 participation tools, and process for document review/public input on documents. A working meeting will 199 be held with City staff to review this outline and gather information and input from the City on 200 identification of key stakeholders, preferred strategies for outreach, and schedules for outreach and 201 meetings. The Draft and Final Plan will be prepared following this initial meeting. 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 Elements of the public participation plan include the following: • Establish goals and objectives of public involvement • Identify internal (City) and external stakeholders • Strategy and recommended approach for engaging stakeholders (may be different for different groups) • Strategy for outreach and communication about the shoreline update • Recommended type of outreach events • Recommendations for a facilitator(s) for stakeholder meetings • Development of surveys or questionnaires to solicit input • General schedule for stakeholder input and solicitation of input during the SMP process • Methods for documenting public involvement and input • Methods for addressing and incorporating public input • Outline of the public participation update section that will go in quarterly progress reports 224 As specified, in the task descriptions for this Phase, the Consultant will provide the City with assistance 225 on selected public involvement tasks. Assistance with public involvement in subsequent Phases is 226 included under those Phase tasks later in this scope. Assistance in Phase I will include: 227 228 • Provide examples of survey questions and input on the survey to be sent to shoreline property owners; • Assist in preparation of informational posters on the SMP Update for display at public events; 229 • Participate in a Cour of the marine shorelines with City and key stakeholders; Citv of l3remerlon SMP Updute Scnpe of Wovk 08-28-0> 230 • Assist with development of a logo for the SMP Update; Consultant will prepare 2-3 draft logos for the 231 City to review and discuss, and then based on the selected logo, prepare a final graphic to be used by 232 the City on outreach materials. 233 234 235 Assumptions • Bremerton Staff will be primarily responsible for brie�`ings of the Planning Commission and City Council with assistance from the Consultant as specified for individual tasks. 236 • Bremerton Staff will initiate coordination with adjacent jurisdictions engaged in similar SMP 237 update tasks, for the purpose of efticiently using grant funds, sharing information and methods of 238 analysis, drafting compatible SMP policies, regulations, environment designations and 239 coordinating public involvement and will transmit other jurisdiction comments to the Consultant, 240 ar invite other j urisdictions to scheduled meetings consistent with Task A of the 241 Bremerton/Ecology Agreement. 242 243 244 245 e City staff will be responsible for the logistical work to arrange facilities and inform attendees about meeting times/locations, prepare agenda and meeting records. • Exhibits to support public participation will be produced by City staff with assistance from the Consultant as specified for individual tasks. 246 • Bremerton Staff will e-mail the electronic file of public participation plan and strategy consistent 247 with Chapter 90.58.130 to Ecology project officer consistent with Task 1.2 of the 248 Bremerton/Ecology Agreement (Due: October 31, 2009) 249 250 251 252 253 • Parametrix will assist City with development and production of communication materials for mailings, website, and public meetings • The City will maintain the project website. • Consultant staff participation at meetings is limited to 2 hours, plus travel time, unless otherwise specifically provided under individual tasks. 254 • Bremerton staff may revise the allocation of ineetings or duration of ineetings within the total 255 Consultant hours provided for meetings. 256 Consultant Deliverables 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 • Draft Public Participation Plan. Delivered to Bremerton Staff October 9, 2009. • Final Public Participation Plan. Delivered to Bremerton Staff October 23, 2009; assuming review comments received by October 16, 2009. • Draft and Final logo. Draft delivered to Bremerton Staff on October 23; Final on November 6, 2009. • Revised Public Participation Plan to incorporate Ecology comments; Due two weeks following receipt of Ecology comments. Citv of Bremertoii SMP Updale Scope of Work 08-28-09 264 Bremerton Deliverables 265 • Bremerton Staff will e-mail the electronic file of public participation plan and strategy 266 consistent with Chapter 90.58.130 to Ecology project officer consistent with Task 1.2 of 267 the Bremerton/Ecology Agreement (Date due: October 31, 2009) 268 • During public involvement for the project, Bremerton Staff will maintain a comment 269 response matrix of all comments received from Ecology, other agencies, from the public 270 and stakeholders, Planning Commission, City Council and other forums and provide to 271 the Consultant periodically as new information is added. 272 PHASE 2: SHORELINE INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS 273 (Ecology Grant Agreement Task 2.1 and Task 2.2) 274 Goals and Objectives 275 The shoreline inventory and analysis provides a factual basis for shoreline policy and regulatory 276 decisions, preliminary cumulative impact analysis, and restoration planning. The Consultant will assist 277 the City in identifying and obtaining existing information on watershed-scale processes and shareline 278 ecological functions and land use, and compiling the GIS maps. The inventory will be used to 279 characterize existing conditions and provide a baseline from which future conditions can be assessed. 280 Phase Approach 281 The inventory and analysis will follow a logical process outlined in the Shareline Guidelines and the 282 Ecology grant. The Consultant will manage information resources in a manner that produces focused and 283 useful infornlation for making shareline management decisions. 284 Task 2.1 — Complete Shoreline Inventory 285 Goals and Objectives 286 Identify, obtain, and compile existing shoreline information, review information for relevance, identify 287 data gaps, and prepare draft list of data sources. Use the data to compile an inventory of existing 288 shoreline ecological functions and land use patterns, summarizing this information on a set of working 289 maps. The inventory will inform the analysis and characterization (Task 2.2). 290 Approach 291 Subtask 2.1a: Compiling Information. The Consultant will compile a list of available data sources 292 relevant to the shoreline inventory and analysis, and evaluate the adequacy of the information for the 293 analysis. The City will review the list and augment with any additional information resources in their 294 possession. Existing information and technical studies produced via the WRIA planning processes, the 295 East Kitsap County Nearshore Habitat Assessment (EKNHA), and relevant studies on Puget Sound will 296 provide much of the required infortnation. The Consultant will work with City staff to identify existing 297 GIS data from a variety of sources through review of sources used in current studies. Data sources will 298 likely include the existing City system, Kitsap County, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, FEMA, 299 WSDOT, Ecology, DNR, USGS, Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Program (PSNERP), 300 Puget Sound Partnership (PSP), and other sources. The Consultant will evaluate the appropriateness of 301 available information for the purpose of this study, and for future public and permit center working maps 302 for administration of regulations. Ciry of Breme� ton SMP Update tl 08-?8-OI Scope of Wovk 303 This evaluation includes a data gap analysis to identify key resource issues that are not understood 304 adequately based on existing information and that are needed to address the inventory elements listed in 305 the Shoreline Guidelines 306 Subtask 2.1b: Inventory Sltoreline Conditions. The Consultant will use existing reports, maps, aerial 307 photos, oblique photos and GIS data to inventory shoreline ecological conditions and land use patterns 308 along the City's shorelines. Information compiled as part of the inventory will include the following at a 309 minimum (to the extent such information is pertinent and readily available): 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 Shoreline vegetation Shoreline modifications, including docks, bulkheads and other structural modifications Fish and wildlife use and habitats Current land use patterns within and adjacent to shorelines Zoning and Comprehensive Plan land use designations 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 • Transportation and utility facilities • Critical areas as defined in RCW36.70A and Bremerton Municipal Code • Degraded areas with potential for restoration • Existing and potential public access sites � Channel migration zones (if any) • FEMA floodplain and floodway • Known archaeological and historic sites • Public lands, parks and recreational areas • Geology and soils • Aquifer recharge areas • Frequently flooded areas • 303(d) listed waterbodies • Shellfish growing areas • Priority habitats or species locations s Eroding shorelines Drift cells The Consultant will review criteria defined in RCW 90.58.030 used to identify and map Sharelmes of the State within, the City's jurisdiction and any Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs), as well as areas of special interest, rapidly developing waterfronts, previously identified toxic or hazardous material clean-up sites, and eroding shorelines. The Consultant will recommend whether new information indicates a need to change the definition or extent of shoreline jurisdiction described in the current Shoreline Master Program or preliminary working jurisdictional maps. C�ly of Bre�ne� ton SMP Up�lute Scope of Work 9 OS-28-09 337 Consultant Deliverables 338 • Technical MeYnorandum evaluating available information, including a bibliography of existing 339 studies, GIS infonnation; information available in non-GIS format that may be integrated in the 340 GIS system; additional data needs not included in existing information (data gaps) and proposed 341 methods for integrating external data with the City GIS system. Delivered to Bremerton Staf£ 342 November 15, 2009. 343 • Working set of GIS maps summarizing information on shoreline ecological functions and land 344 use. Delivered to Bremerton Staf£ December 30, 2009. 345 • Shoreline Inventory Technical Report, Delivered to Bremerton Staff: January 29, 2010 (Ecology 346 Task 2.1 due February 28, 2010). 347 Bremerton Deliverables 348 • Bremerton staff will prepare and deliver to the Consultant a list of all GIS resources in the city 349 system, existing technical studies prepared for the city since 2002 on critical areas within the 350 shoreline and plans and permit conditions for recent development approved or proposed on the 351 shoreline. Depending on the volumes of reports available, not all reports may be reviewed or 352 utilized by the Consultant. Delivered to Consultant: September 30, 2009. 353 • Specifications for GIS-based digital working maps of inventory information, which are required 354 to support compatibility of the inventory maps with existing City GIS. Delivered to Consultant: 355 October 1, 2009. 356 Assumptions 357 • The Consultant will be primarily responsible for assembling GIS information from the City 358 system and other sources, including a list of citations for all data layers. The Consultant will be 359 responsible for preparing all GIS based maps and exhibits, with coardination from the City on 360 content and format. 361 • In keeping with the Shoreline Guidelines (WAC 173-26), which specify that the inventory and 362 characterization be based on existing information (as opposed to data collection or field work), 363 The Consultant intends to limit field reconnaissance to one or two day "spot checks" of areas of 364 special interest. The purpose of the "spot checks" would be to "ground-truth" observations 365 derived from existing information. This will include a one-day survey of the Bremerton Marine 366 Shoreline. A contingency for boat rental is included in the budget. 367 Task 2.2: Shoreline Analysis and Characterization 368 (Ecology Grant Agreement Task 2.2) 369 Goals an�l Objectives 370 Develop a detailed understanding of the relationship between ecosystem-wide processes and shoreline 371 functions and document tindings to support subsequent phases and tasks. 372 Approach 373 The Consultant will analyze and integrate the information provided in the inventory (Task 2.1), the 374 characterization of ecosystem processes (Task 2.2.1), and the assessment of shoreline ecological functions Gry of Bremerton SMP Update 10 08-38-09 Scape af Work 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 (Task 2.2.2), and summarize fmdings in a report and map folio. Findings will inform shoreline policy and regulatory development and protection and restoration opportunities. This analysis will be conducted as three subtasks — characterize ecosystem-wide processes; characterize shoreline functions; and identify opportunities. Together these analyses will: • Present the geographic (watershed or drift cell) and jurisdictional boundaries or context for the SMP update. • Qualitatively characterize ecosystem processes that affect Bremerton's shorelines. • Characterize ecological functions of Bremerton's shorelines. • Identify future opportunities for shareline protection, restoration, public access and potential use conflicts so as to infonn later environment designation and allowed use decisions. • Develop the foundation far cumulative impacts analysis — current and projected shoreline land use patterns and potential use conflicts. • Present the findings of the shoreline analysis in text and graphic form, including initial recommendations for protection and restoration of ecological functions. 389 The results from the three subtasks will be summarized in three separate Technical Reports with maps 390 (see Deliverables section below); these three reports will provide the foundation for the preparation of the 391 overall Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report (Task 2.3). 392 Subtask 2.2.1 Characterize Ecosystem-wide Processes 393 394 395 396 Goals and Objectives Identify natural watershed-scale or drift cell-scale process controls and management activities that influence shoreline ecological function and highlight key issues for managing shoreline resources. Approach 397 This characterization will present a coarse analysis of the broader area that influences the City's shoreline 398 jurisdiction. It will include a narrative and a limited number of maps describing and illustrating the 399 processes in the larger drainage area or marine shoreline linked to shoreline ecologic functions. These 400 processes include the uptake, transport and deposition of water, sediment, nutrients, organic matter, 401 heat/light, and pollutants. Specifically, the description of ecosystem processes will: 402 • Present the basic geographic context — geology, soils, topography, climate, vegetation, and 403 drainage patterns, and a description of how these are relevant to the shoreline. This information 404 may be available through existing regional watershed or natural resource related plans. 405 • Identify basic ecological processes in the geographic context of the City that are linked to 406 shoreline conditions — large woody debris recruitment, biological processes, groundwater and 407 surface water patterns, wind and wave energy, sediment dynamics (source, transport, deposition). 408 409 • Location of areas of alteration or impairment to ecological processes (e.g., shoreline armoring, impervious surfaces). 410 • Identify critical habitat areas (e.g., salmon spawning, eelgrass, ar estuaries). Ciry of Bremerlon SMP Updale Scope of Work 1/ OS-18-09 411 • Identify potential areas where degraded shoreline processes and functions could be restored 412 through either site specifc or programmatic actions. 413 • Note location and nature of major human physical land uses within the watershed that affect 414 ecosystem-wide processes, e.g., dams, major roads, railroads, land alteration patterns, industrial 415 developments. 416 • Note location and nature of known pertinent parameters or sites relating to regulatory activities, 417 e.g. TMDL, ESA listings, contaminated sites. 418 • Identify issues that can be addressed through the SMP and those addressed through other 419 planning and regulatory efforts either because they are outside of SMA jurisdiction, or that 420 primary regulatory responsibility is assigned to state or federal agencies (MCTA, ESA, etc.). 421 • Identify preliminary opportunities for protection/restoration of areas outside SMA jurisdiction 422 and nearby uplands and adjacent areas essential for maintaining shoreline form and function. 423 The characterization of ecosystem-wide processes will provide a context for Task 2.2.2. This analysis will 424 incorporate existing data, GIS analysis/mapping, and published infornlation from relevant studies such as 425 the �ast Kitsap County Nearshore Habitat Assessment, WRIA 15 Salmon Recovery planning, and 426 relevant Puget Sound shoreline assessment studies. 427 Assumptions 428 • The characterization of ecosystem-wide processes will rely primarily on data from inter- 429 jurisdictional, watershed, or regional inventories pursuant to WAC 173-26-201(3)(c). This 430 analysis will incorporate existing data, GIS analysis/mapping, published information from WRIA 431 15, and Central and South Puget Sound, and the results of the East Kitsap County Nearshore 432 Habitat Assessment to the extent that the Kitsap County model results and underlying data are 433 available, useable, and accurate. 434 Subtask 2.2.2: Characterize Shoreline Functions 435 Coals and Objectives 436 The analysis of shoreline reach functions will assess existing shoreline conditions at a finer or reach scale 437 within the City of Bremerton in the context of ecosystem-wide processes identified in Task 2.2.1, and 438 establish an environmental baseline for shoreline planning and regulation. 439 Approach 440 This shoreline analysis will be a more detailed analysis of the City's shoreline jurisdiction that includes a 441 narr�tive with references to maps and GIS data. The characterization will evaluate and assess shoreline 442 ecological functions based on the current scientific data. The shoreline will be separated into reaches 443 based on land use and ecological processes (such as man-made physical features, stream confluences, 444 and/or land use patterns). Functions will be described as they are associated with each shoreline reach. 445 Specifically, t11is characterization will: 446 • Divide shorelines into smaller segments or reaches for analysis based on similarity of physical 447 and biological conditions, and shoreline and adjacent land use characteristics. Gry of 6remerron SMP Update 12 Og-?g_�9 Scope of Work ..; .. 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 • Evaluate the physical, biological and land use characteristics of the shorelines to determine the overall condition of the habitat and shareline resources. • Evaluate and assess shoreline ecological functions based on current scientific understanding of conditions within shoreline jurisdiction. Reach information will be organized by major watersheds, drift cells, or substantial differences in existing and future land use and categories may include: • Gorst Creek • Downtown Waterfront • Port Washington Narrows • Oyster Bay, Ostrich Bay, and Phinney Bay • Sinclair Inlet/Gorst Estuary • Lake Kitsap • Union Reservoir Subtask 2.2.3: Slioreline Use and Opportunities Analysis Goals and Objectives 463 Utilize the Inventory/Analysis to identify potential opportunities and possible impediments to the 464 protection and restoration of ecological functions as well as current and potential land use and public 465 access opportunities and constraints to inform policy decisions on the Shoreline Master Program. As 466 needed, this Task will also refine the shoreline jurisdiction boundaries developed in Task 1.1. 467 �.: • Approach This effort is based on the inventory/characterization and will flow naturally from the methodology and presentation structure. 470 Two basic types of opportunities will be identified: 471 • Ecological functions 472 ■ Protection 473 ■ Restoration 474 • Land use opportunities 475 ■ Water dependent, water related and mixed use opportunities 476 ■ Public access opportunities 477 Ecological protection and restoration opportunities will be largely addressed by the 478 inventory/characterization subtasks above. An important perspective will be provided by the ecosystem- 479 wide analysis in identifying functions that can be provided in Bremerton and those that are more 480 effectively provided elsewhere in the watershed. It is critical that the SMP recognize this and provide 481 opportunities for off-site and on-site mitigation and enhancement. The Consultant team will identify what C�ty of B�emerton SMP Up�late l3 OS-38-09 Scope of Work 482 483 .;. .� 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 resources should be the focus in Bremerton and where other opportunities in the watershed should be pursued. Land use opportunities will be driven both by the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and by the desires of local communities. � Water related use opportunities—One of the central goals of the SMA is to prefer uses that are unique to or dependent upon use of the state's shoreline including ports, shoreline recreational uses (including but not limited to parks, marinas, piers, and other improvements facilitating public access to shorelines), industrial and commercial developments that are particularly dependent on their location on or use of the shorelines of the state, and other development that will provide an opportunity for substantial numbers of people to enjoy the shorelines of the state. We anticipate this will be assessed through: ■ Identification of existing resources and the extent of use, particularly seasonal overcrowding. ■ Providing an estimate of future demand for shoreline use consistent with WAC 173-26- 201(3)(d)(ii) requirements based on: ■ Moorage demand projections based on both growth in boating ownership and options for storage or moorage ■ Shoreline park demand based on IAC guidelines and local polices. ■ Demand for mixed-use development based on the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and economic development goals. 501 • Public shoreline access opportunities will be addressed based on the demand analysis as well as 502 on sites identified in the inventory/characterization. The potential for future access locations will 503 be based partially on existing transportation, utility, and public ownership patterns and also on 504 opportunities for acquisition or provision as part of new development or redevelopment. 505 Identification will be coordinated with the Bremerton and Kitsap County Parks, Recreation, and 506 Trails plans and policies, as well as NGOs active in the Bremerton area (e.g., Cascade Land 507 Conservancy, Kitsap Trees and Shorelines Association). 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 Opportunities will be identified for separate reaches of the shoreline. Assumptions • Analysis will be based primarily on the Inventory/Characterization or specific additional information identified in the tasks above. • Bremerton Staff will arrange for consultation and coordination with Ecology, other agencies and adjacent jurisdictions and will forward comments to the Consultant. • Review comments on the draft Technical Reports will be addressed and incorporated into the Draft Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report (Task 2.3). Consultant Delive�°ables Task 2.2 Draft Technical Report on Characterization of Ecosystem Wide Processes, with Map Folio. Delivered to Bremerton Staff : March 30, 2010. 519 • Draft Technical Report on Characterization of Shoreline Functions, with Map Folio. Delivered to 520 Bremerton Staff: March 30, 2010. Ciry of Bre�ne�7on SMP Upda�e l4 08-?8-09 Scope of Wovk 521 • Draft Technical Report on Current and Potential Use, Public Access, and Restoration 522 Opportunities, with Map Folio. Delivered to Bremerton Staff: March 30, 2010. 523 Bremerton Deliverables Task 2.2 524 • Bremerton Staff will e-mail the Consultant Technical Report electronic files to the Ecology 525 project officer. 526 Task 2.3: Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report 527 (Ecology Grant Task 2.3) 528 Goals and Objectives 529 Summarize and present the findings from the characterization of ecosystem-wide processes, shoreline 530 functions, and opportunities in a Draft Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Technical Report with 531 Map Folio 532 Approach 533 Using the three Technical Reports prepared for Task 2.2, the information from the shoreline analysis will 534 be presented in a Draft Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Technical Report and Map Folio. Task 535 2.3 will also include incorporating responses to Ecology review comments on the three draft Technical 536 Reports. 537 The Consultant will prepare a Shoreline Inventory and Analysis Report with accompanying maps 538 summarizing the information and data collected in Tasks 2.1 and 2.2 as they relate to development of an 539 effective SMP. The report will include synthesis maps at appropriate scales that illustrate findings and 540 correspond with the narrative. Maps will differentiate the land and water contained within the SMA 541 jurisdiction from adjacent lands and contributing drainages. 542 Coarse-scale maps will depict both the significant geologic, hydrologic, and ecologic features most 543 essential to maintaining shoreline form and function and those land uses that may have altered upland 544 processes influencing shoreline functions. Maps and/or aerial photos at the shoreline reach scale will 545 indicate applicable inventory features such as known presence of listed species, riparian vegetation, 546 existing land uses, mapped/known critical areas, and shoreline modifications to the extent such 547 information can be mapped using available data sources. Potential areas for shoreline uses, public access, 548 restoration and/or protection will be indicated. The portfolio will include a comprehensive list and map 549 of existing public access to shorelines. 550 Consultant Deliverables Task 2.3 551 • Shoreline Inventory, Analysis and Characterization Report and map folio to document the 552 preliminary results of the shoreline inventory and characterization as described above. (Ecology 553 Task 2.2 due May 31, 2010) Review Draft delivered to Bremerton Staff: Apri130, 2009; Revised 554 Draft delivered to Bremerton Staff: May 24, 2010). 555 Bremerton Deliverables Task 2.3 Ciry of Brernerton SMP Update I S 08-28-09 Scope of Work 556 • Bremerton will e-mail the Consultant Draft Inventory, Analysis and Characterization Report 557 electronic file to the Ecology project officer (Ecology Tasks 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3; Entire Phase 2 due: 558 May 31, 2010). 559 • Bremerton will prepare an SMP Submittal Checklist for tasks completed in Phase 2(Ecology 560 Task 2.4 due May 31, 2010). 561 562 PHASE 3: DEVELOP POLICIES AND REGULATIONS 563 (Ecology Grant Agreement Tasks 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6) 564 Goals and Objectives 565 This Phase builds on the information developed by the Inventory and Characterization on ecosystem 566 processes and shoreline function. The objectives of tasks in this Phase are to understand community goals 567 through the communiry visioning process, and then integrate the multiple goals and objectives of the 568 shoreline program, identify the critical tradeoffs, and make decisions for balancing multiple objectives. [.YV� 570 571 572 This Phase will include three related efforts: • Community visioning process for public involvement and decision-making • Identify regulatory approaches that achieve the goals of the SMA while providing a predictable, fair system that provides guidance routine land use decisions, as well as major projects. 573 • Prepare preliminary cumulative impact analysis of the proposed program 574 Division of Labor: 575 In completing this critical phase of the project Bremerton staff and the Consultant team both will provide 576 substantial contributions to the public involvement and decision making process. 577 • Bremerton staff will be in the primary role o£ 578 ■ Providing information on existing land use, approved development, and expected 579 development trends based on Comprehensive Plan and Economic Development Plan policies; 580 ■ Working with the Consultant team to develop appropriate options. 581 ■ Conducting the public involvement effort, with the support of the Consultant team. 582 ■ Conducting meetings and soliciting policy direction from the Planning Commission and City 583 Council, with the support of the Consultant team. 584 585 586 587 588 :' • The Consultant team will be the lead for identifying conceptual options and preparing supporting scientific information based on the inventory/characterization. • Agencies will be involved in providing input on the preferred approach. The Consultant team will attempt to get "buy-in" to the approach from key agencies such as Ecology and WDFW on the program. Phase Approach 590 The tasks in this phase are all closely related and will be developed using an iterative approach. The 591 visioning process (Task 3.1) will establish the timeline for public input and participation, while during the C�ry of Bremer7on SMP Update ! 6 08-28-0) Scope of Work 592 development of Task 3.2, the Consultant will establish regular meetings with the project team and the 593 City to review how proposed environmental designations tnight affect policies and regulations, 594 implications for the CAO and other policies and plans, as well as what cumulative impacts might be under 595 different scenarios for shoreline policy and regulation. This will provide a mechanism far facilitating a 596 more integrated approach and allow review of the consequences of different regulatory options as policies 597 are being developed. 598 Task 3.1: Community Visioning Process 599 (Ecology Grant Agreement Task 3.1) 600 Goals and Objectives 601 This task will address the process of developing a community vision that includes citizen goals and 602 aspirations for use of the shoreline and balances competing demands for preservation and restoration of 603 ecological functions, and fulfills the vision of the City's other planning processes. 604 Approach 605 Consultant will assist the City with targeted support during the visioning process as specified here. The 606 Public Participation Plan will outline the approach to the visioning process, and the visioning process 607 itself will closely link with Task 3.2. Consultant tasks on the visioning process include the following: 608 • Visioning approach developed as part of public participation plan; 609 • Public workshops — present information from the inventory and characterization analysis and 610 gather stakeholder input during workshops; 611 • Assist City with presenting proposed policies and regulations through a series of visioning 612 meetings; and 613 • Work with City to integrate visioning outcomes into a recommended strategy for public access, 614 shoreline use, and resource protection and restoration. 615 Consultant Deliverable Task 3.1 616 • Power Point presentation for Public Meetings, Interest Groups, Planning Commission, City 617 Council on Inventory and Characterization, policy and regulation options, and identification of 618 opportunities. Delivered to Bremerton Staff: July 30, 2010 619 • Draft Public information handout on Inventory and Characterization, policy and regulation 620 options, and identification of opportunities for use in public meetings, mailings to property 621 owners, or newspaper articles. Delivered to Bremerton Staff: July 30, 2010 622 • Attendance at meetings as provided in the Assumptions far Task 3.1 below. 623 Brerr�erton Deliverable Task 3.1 624 • Scheduling, publicity and exhibits for meetings 625 • Record of comments received in matrix format and response to non-technical issues 626 • Direction to Consultant on results of Planning Commission and City Council consideration'of 627 options 628 Assumptions for Task 3.1 629 • Consultant will include preparation of the visionin� plan as part of the Public Participation Plan. Ciry of 6�°emerton SMP Update l7 08-�8-py Scope of Work 630 • Consultant will assist City with up to 8 public involvement meetings (assume 2 general public 631 meetings; 2 with focus groups see below; and 2 with Planning Commission and 2 with City 632 Council) - to include preparing materials for the meetings, attendance at the meetings, and 633 preparing a summary of the meeting discussion and outcomes. 634 • Consultant will prepare presentation materials (powerpoint and handouts) for the City to use in 635 the visioning process - on the results of the Inventory and Characterization, preliminary policies 636 and regulations, and identification of opportunities. 637 • Consultant will prepare a Technical Memorandum summarizing the results of the visioning 638 meetings and including recommendations to carry forward into the development of policies and 639 regulations. 640 • Bremerton Staff will organize a Citizen Advisory Committee and Technical Advisory Committee. 641 • Separate "interest group" meetings may be scheduled with representatives selected by the City for 642 specific areas with distinct ecological characteristics, land use or stakeholder groups. Interest 643 group meetings will be held to solicit input on the issues of interest to the stakeholders in the area, 644 but will not provide detailed review of proposals. Meetings are assumed for up to three interest 645 areas or stakeholder groups. 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 CS'11] .. • The Power Point presentation prepared for the public meeting, interest group meetings, Planning Commission and City Council will be essentially the same. • Consultant will provide drafts of the public information handout, potential property mailings, and newspaper publicity. City staff will be responsible for the final revision, printing and distribution. • City staff will be responsible for the logistical work to arrange facilities and inform attendees about meeting times/locations, prepare agenda and meeting records. • Exhibits to support this task will be prepared by Consultant. Total exhibits prepared will be limited to printouts of Power Point slides and/or public information handouts. • Bremerton Staff will arrange for consultation and coordination with other city staff, Ecology, other agencies and adjacent jurisdictions and will forward an integrated set of comments to the Consultant. Task 3.2: Shoreline Policies and Regulations, Environment Designations, Shoreline Use and Modification Policies and Regulations (Ecology Grant Agreement Tasks 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5) Goals and Objectives 662 This task will develop options for shoreline policies and regulations, propose Shoreline Environmental 663 Designations, and Shoreline Use and Modification Policies and Regulations. This task will integrate a 664 number of related issues that will flow from the inventory and analysis, but also represent an opportunity 665 for the City to decide how to integrate the SMP with other City policies and regulations. ••• Overall Task Approach 667 This task includes three related subtasks: C�ry oj�Bremerton SMP Update Scope of Work /8 OS-28-09 668 3.2.1 Develop general SMP goals, policies, and regulations 669 3.2.2 Develop Shoreline Environmental Designations and Use and Moditication Policies and Regulations 670 32.3 Draft Shoreline Master Plan and Incorporate into Critical Areas Ordinance 671 Subtask 3.2.1 General SMPgoals, policies, and regulations 672 (Ecolo�y Grant Agreement Task 3.2) 673 Approacl: 674 The Consultant will work closely with the City staff and stakeholders to identify goals, develop policies 675 and regulatory recommendations that reflect the findings of the inventary and characterization and the 676 visioning process, are consistent with the new guidelines for SMPs, and balance the multiple goals of the 677 Shoreline Management Act. This task also represents an opportunity for the City to decide how to 678 integrate the SMP with other policies and regulations and to ensure consistency with other on-going 679 planning processes. 680 To make it easy to track and discuss proposed policy and regulation recommendations, Consultant will 681 create a table or annotated summary that shows each recommendation, how it fits the new guidelines for 682 SMPs (meets, exceeds, or differs), how it fits with key outcomes of the public participation ar visioning 683 process, and what specific management needs identified during the inventory and characterization are 684 being addressed. 685 Issues to be addressed at this stage include: 686 • Whether to employ an overlay of Shareline Environmental Designations (SEDs) or separate shoreline 687 zoning classifications that may extend into uplands outside of shoreline jurisdiction (and address the 688 adjacent lands issue) 689 • The extent of prescriptive regulations versus relying primarily on criteria or performance standards 690 • Crafting critical area regulations as part of the SMP to recognize the wide variability of ecologically 691 productive areas and the existing land use patterns. 692 Consultant Deliverable 693 Draft Technical Memorandum describing options and recommended changes to goals, policies, and 694 regulations, with tabular summary of recommendations. Draft delivered to Bremerton Staf£ September 695 30, 2010. 696 Subtask 3.2.2 Shoreline Environmental Designations, Use and Modification Policies and 697 Regulations and Standards 698 (Ecology Grant Agreement Task 3.4) 699 Goals and Objectives 700 Shoreline Environment Designations provide the primary means of applying regulations that are 701 appropriate to both the type of anticipated use and the character of existing ecological functions. This 702 task will require close collaboration with Bremerton Staff in understanding how existing city regulations 703 work and in developing solutions appropriate to the city's regulatory structure. Citv of B�•emerton SMP Upda�e 19 08-28-09 Scope of Work 704 Approach 705 The Consultant will analyze the existing designations, review Ecology's new recommended designations 706 (WAC 173-26-211), and make recommendations for any changes to the designations, including the 707 rationale for the change. Updated maps with proposed Shoreline Designations will be produced. 708 As an initial resource, Bremerton staff will provide a summary report of the existing regulatory system 709 that addresses the following: 710 • Application to typical single family, multi-family and non-residential shoreline development of 711 existing city land use, and other regulations, including density, bulk standards, parking standards, 712 tree preservation, land disturbance, clearing and grading, flood protection, stormwater 713 management, utility standards and road standards to identify interrelationships with the SMP and 714 provisions of other codes 715 • Provide a description of application of the above standards to a cross-section of recently approved 716 applications for shoreline development permits to identify what works effectively and what needs 717 code and non-code (administrative) improvements. Include copies of a sample of recent shoreline 718 applications and record of city action. 719 • Bremerton staff will distribute a brief questionnaire to recent permit applicants to include 720 developers, engineers, scientists and planners to identify regulations that work effectively and 721 issues that cause confusion with respect to the development, permitting and compliance / 722 enforcement processes. Bremerton staff will distribute the survey and summarize the responses. 723 The Consultant will assist the Bremerton Staff in developing an outline of potential issues to be 724 addressed. 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 • One ineeting will be held with Bremerton development review staff to identify problems with and/or opportunities to provide for more consistency and coardination between programs. Issues to be addressed by the Consultant include: Overview description of existing Shoreline Designations including: Designation Criteria ■ Existing geographic location ■ Existing bulk dimensional requirements • Matrix Comparison of Existing Shoreline Designations to WAC 173- 26-211 Environmental Designation Provisions. Matrix Evaluation of Existing Shoreline Designations in relation to scientific information. ■ Ecological context, including the Shoreline Inventory/Characterization ■ Presence of Critical Areas ■ Potential for restoration of ecological processes and functions ■ Existing use characteristics and potential cumulative impacts ■ Potential for "water dependent uses" . ■ Relationship to Comprehensive Plan and Zoning, 741 • Options for Changes to Existing Shoreline Designations. These options will be presented in 742 matrix format and be developed from the evaluation in above and generally will reflect a range 743 based on advantages and disadvantages of the following approaches: Ciry of Bremei•(on SMP Update 20 08-38-09 Scope nf Work 744 745 746 747 748 749 ■ Employ an overlay of Shoreline Environmental Desigiations (SED) similar to the existing Bremerton Code ■ Employ an overlay of Shoreline Environmental Designations (SED) similar to the Ecology WAC 173-26-211. ■ Employ shoreline zoning classifications as separate classifications that may extend into uplands outside of shoreline jurisdiction (and address the adjacent lands issue). 750 The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to: 751 • The advantages of prescriptive regulations for application to routine permit decisions (such as 752 single family development) versus relying primarily on criteria or performance standards as an 753 overlay to existing zoning; 754 • The extent of future development an whether it is likely to be largely contained within shareline 755 jurisdiction, or whether shoreline jurisdiction is likely to be only a part of a larger development; 756 • In each case, the application of regulatory options shall be assessed separately for specific areas 757 of the city, as identified during the Inventory and Characterization. 758 Consultant Deliverables 759 • Draft Technical Memorandum addressing Shoreline Environment Designations (SED), with Use 760 and Modification Policies, Regulations and Standards, in relation to the opportunities and 761 impediments analysis in Task 2.2 outlining alternative strategies for preserving and enhancing 762 ecological functions based on the characteriaation of shoreline processes and functions. The 763 analysis will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of options implementation, in a matrix 764 format for Ecology, public, and agency review. (Ecology Tasks 3.3 and 3.4) Delivered to 765 Bremerton Staff: October 30, 2010. 766 Bremerton Deliverables 767 • Provide a MS Word version of all existing policies and regulations related to the Shoreline 768 Master Plan and provide direction on any changes to the format of policies and regulations that 769 differ from the existing plans and regulations 770 • Summary report of the existing regulatory system that addresses the following: 771 ■ Application to typical single family, multi-family and non-residential shoreline development 772 of existing city land use, and other regulations; 773 ■ Provide a description of application of the above standards to a cross-section of recently 774 approved applications for shoreline development permits to identify what works effectively 775 and what needs code and non-code (administrative) improvements together with copies of a 776 sample of recent shoreline applications and record of city action. 777 ■ Distribution and compilation of questionnaire to recent permit applicants 778 ■ Host meeting with Bremerton development review staff to identify problems and/or 779 opportunities to provide for more consistency and coordination between programs. 780 Summarize meeting results. 781 Subtask 3.2.3: Develop Draft Shoreline Master Plan and Incorporate Critical Areas Ordinance 782 (Ecology Grant Agreement Task 3.5) 783 Goals and Objectives Gtv of Bremerton SMP Update Scope of Work 2/ 08-38-09 784 The objectives of this task are to bring together the results of the previous Phase III tasks and the 785 Inventory and Characterization results to prepare the draft Shoreline Management Plan, along with 786 recommendations for incorporation into the City's Critical Areas Ordinance. The Draft Plan will include 787 administrative provisions for permit administration, compliance, and enforcement. 788 Approach 789 Draft Shoreline Master Program. The Consultant will provide the Draft City of Bremerton Shareline 790 Master Plan to include: 791 • Environment Designations or Zoning classifications Based on the policy direction resulting 792 from previous Phase 3 tasks, the Consultant and City staff will develop environment designations 793 , or zoning classifications that: 794 ■ Reflect the findings of the shoreline inventory and characterization regarding ecologically 795 important functions that differ between reaches; 796 ■ Reflect similar allowed or proposed uses; 797 ■ Have similar potential far implementing setbacks and buffers based on existing lot 798 configurations; 799 • Bulk and Dimensional Standards Consultant will develop recommendations for specific bulk 800 and dimension standards for density, setbacks and buffers, including critical area buffers, for each 801 use and each shoreline designation based on the criteria of "no loss of net ecological function". 802 • Standards. Consultant will draft recommendations for amendments to the existing City Code to 803 incorporate specific performance standards for uses based on the criteria of "no loss of net 804 ecological function", and the following general criteria: 805 ■ For uses exempt from obtaining a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, and which 806 contribute to restoration of ecological function, such as vegetation enhancement, provide 807 recommendations for performance standards that would allow applicants and staff to approve 808 proposals that are coordinated with other agencies' requirements, such as the Washington 809 Department of Fish and Wildlife Hydraulics Project Approval and Corps of Engineers 810 Nationwide or Regional Permits. 811 ■ For uses exempt from obtaining a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, provide 812 recommendations for performance standards that would allow applicants to develop 813 proposals and staff to approve proposals and enforce conditions based on existing 814 information generally without specialist reports, while providing a"precautionary approach," 815 in limiting potential impacts on resources. 816 ■ For uses exempt from obtaining a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, provide 817 recommendations for the option of providing more detailed assessment by qualified 818 professionals of on-site and local environmental processes allowing alternative approaches 819 that may be approved in lieu of the performance standards, above. 820 ■ For uses requiring a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, recommend measurable 821 performance standards, where practical, to allow specific assessment in technical reports 822 required of applicants and obj ective review, approval and enforcement of performance 823 standards required as conditions. ' 824 ■ Recommend opportunities to provide incentives far restoration in shoreline regulations. 825 ■ Identify opportunities for integration with Critical Areas Ordinance standards and identify 826 potential additional standards in cases where specific shoreline processes warrant additional City ofBremer�on SM/' Upclate 22 �� Scope of Work 827 828 .� 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 . . . . . protection, restoration or performance standards to meet the criteria of no loss of net ecological function". s Critical areas regulations will be based on: • The assesstnent of existing ecological functions in the Phase 2 Inventory/Characterization and the extent to which: ■ Buffers are currently in place that provided specific ecological functions ■ Buffers may be needed to maintain existing ecological functions, given the potential for ecological degnadation with new development or redevelopment ■ Buffers may provide enhancement of ecological functions, and more specifically for anadromous fish; • Assessment of the practical limits to imposing standard buffers relating to factors such as: 839 ■ Existing single-family development lot depth and existing structure location 840 ■ Existing multi-family development lot depth, structure location, and potential for 841 re-developinent 842 ■ Existing non-residential development, potential for redevelopment, potential for 843 water- dependent use, water-related use and non-water related use and potential 844 for integrating buffer areas into development areas considering lot area, depth, 845 and the range of potential uses. 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 ■ Recommend approaches to develop standards to meet WAC 173-26-221 criteria for archaeological and historic resources, wetlands, geologically hazardous areas, critical saltwater habitats, critical freshwater habitats, flood hazards, public access, vegetation conservation and WAC 197-26-231 for shoreline modification, piers and docks, as well as specific standards for other uses in WAC 173-26-241. ■ Include specific use and modification policies and regulations consistent with SMP guidelines requirements including: o Allowed uses and preferences for shoreline dependent or related uses where appropriate o Provisions for public access o Provisions for shoreline modification and vegetation conservation � Administrative provisions will address: ■ Permit administration ■ Compliance and enforcement ■ Non-conforming uses • Draft map(s) illustrating the land and water area contained within mapped shoreline designation or zoning boundaries will be prepared together with justification and rationale. We anticipate that this task will provide a somewhat different approach for two types of shoreline uses: • Uses that do not require a substantial development pennit, that may have minimal impacts by themselves, but have tlle potential to cause substantial cumulative effects on the shoreline. We anticipate a regulatory framework that: 866 ■ Serves to communicate the important values and performance measures for "exempt" actions 867 such as single-family use, Ci[y of B��e�nei�[on SMP Update 23 08-?8-0) Scope of Work 868 ■ Provides understandable performance standards that are easily communicated to staff, 869 property owners, and professionals. These standards may involve reference to other resource 870 tools not adopted as part of the master program, such as Ecology, WDFW, and Artny Corps 871 of Engineers standards for various types of facilities, and 872 873 ■ Provides incentives to implement facilities that improve ecological functions, especially restoration programs. 874 • Uses that may occur infrequently, but that have the potential to have substantial impacts on the 875 natural environment and surrounding uses. In these cases, extensive permit review is likely and 876 the function of the regulations is largely to establish performance standards decision makers will 877 use in evaluating projects. . . . . .. ..1 . .. . .. . .. Consultant Deliverables • Draft City of Bremerton Shoreline Master Plan. Delivered to Bremerton Staf£ December 1, 2010. • Draft Development Code Revisions. (Addresses Ecology Phase 3 Tasks). Delivered to Bremerton Staff: December 1, 2010. • GIS-based maps of SEDs or zoning designations. Delivered to Bremerton Staf£ December 1, 2010. 884 • Revised Shoreline Master Plan Report incorporating City review comments. Delivered to 885 Bremerton Staff: December 23, 2010. 886 Bremerton Deliverables 887 • Review comments and revisions to Draft SMP Report 888 Assumptions for Task 3.2.3 889 • Bremerton Staff shall provide a MS Word version of all existing policies and regulations related 890 to the Shoreline Master Plan and provide direction on any changes to the format of policies and 891 regulations that differ from existing plans and regulations .� . :' 894 895 896 • The Inventory/Characterization prepared in Phase 2 will provide the inventory related to critical areas; • Administrative provisions of the existing Shoreline Master Program are presumed to be consistent with SPM guidelines and other statutes. Additional provisions of the SMP are expected to use current administrative provisions. 897 Task 3.3: Cumulative Impacts Analysis and No Net Loss Report 898 (Ecology Grant Agreement Task 3.6) 899 Goals and Objectives 900 An evaluation of the incremental and cumulative impacts of options under consideration is an important 901 ongoing element of the SMP update process. The City will need to examine the potential cumulative 902 impacts on shoreline functions of the `reasonably foreseeable future development' from the proposed 903 shoreline master program. At this phase, the preliminary findings of the cumulative impacts analysis, will 904 allow the,City to evaluate the options, and allow the proposed SMP provisions to be adjusted as needed to 905 demonstrate how no net loss of ecological function and SMA use-preferences (water-oriented uses, public City of Bremerton SMP Update 24 pg_Zg_py Scope of Work 906 907 908 access, etc.) will be achieved. This analysis will identify how proposed SMP standards will avoid and offset expected impacts of future pennitted and exempt shoreline development. Approach 909 The inventory/characterization in Phase 2 will provide the basis for identifying existing trends in 910 ecological functions based on existing regulations. The assessment of cumulative impacts would be based 911 on the extent to which these conditions and trends are continued or altered by: 912 • Reasonably foreseeable future development and use of the shoreline under the existing Bremerton 913 SMP (including impacts from unregulated activities, exempt development, and other incremental 914 impacts) 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 • Likely influence of existing zoning regulations to the extent that they narrow the range of allowable development beyond the existing SMP • Likely influence of existing critical area regulations to the extent that t11ey narrow the area in which allowable development may occur or impose specific requirements beyond the existing SMP • Likely intluence of existing state and federal regulations to the extent that they impose standard mitigation requirements on allowable development This preliminary inventory will provide a baseline for assessing the effects of the options for shoreline policies and regulations in changing existing trends of ecological degradation. The Preliminary Cumulative Impact Analysis will identify key environmental issues using the SEPA/GMA integration procedure in WAC 197-11-210. 926 The Consultant team will prepare a draft report demonstrating how shoreline inventory and 927 characterization findings and cumulative impact analysis are reflected in proposed SMP policies, 928 regulations, environment designations, and restoration strategies, as well as an assessment of how 929 proposed policies and regulations will achieve no net loss of ecological function. 930 Consultant Deliverables 931 • Preliminary Cumulative Impact Analysis and No Net Loss Report for Ecology, public, and 932 agency review. (Ecology Task 3.6) Draft Delivered to Bremerton Staff: March 30, 2011; Revised 933 Draft incorporating City review comments delivered to Bremerton Staf£ April 25, 2011. 934 Bre�nerton Deliverables 935 • Bremerton Staff will e-mail the Consultant Cumulative Impacts Analysis and No Net Loss 936 Technical Report electronic file to the Ecology project ofticer (Due to Ecology April 30, 2011); 937 and prepare an SMP Submittal Checklist (Ecology Task 3.7) Due date May 31, 2011 938 Assumptions,for Task 3.3 939 • 940 941 • 942 The influence of existing City of Bremerton regulations will be based on the summary report of the existing regulatory system prepared by Bremerton staff. The influence of existing state and federal regulatory programs will be based on: ■ Corps of Engineers Regional General Permits City o/�Breme� torT SMP Update Scope of Work zs 08-28-09 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 ■ Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Hydraulic Project Approval Guidelines, including Stream Habitat Restoration Guiclelines (SHRG), Design of Roacl Culverts for Fish Passage, Integrated Streanabank Protection Guidelines (ISPG) ■ Washington Department of Ecology Washington State Coastal Zone Managenaent Program Section 309 Assessment and Strate�y, Fourth Round 2006 Section 309 Program Assessment of the status of the nine required improvement areas, and describes the State's tentative CZM Program improvement measures for 2006 through 2010. ■ Stormwater Management Programs will be assessed based on Technical Memorandum Summary and Analysis of Stormwuter Appendix HRegulations and Programs Washington Stormwater Management Stucly ■ Washington Environ�nental Permits Hanc�book, Governor's Office of Regulatory Assistance, 2007 955 • Bremerton Staff will arrange for consultation and coordination with city staff, Ecology, other 956 agencies and adjacent jurisdictions and will forward an integrated set of comments to the 957 Consultant. Consultant revision to the Draft Preliminary Analysis to respond to Ecology or other 958 agency comments will take place in the Final Cumulative Analysis be prepared in Task 4.2 959 960 PHASE 4 961 Task 4.1 962 RESTORATION PLAN AND REVISE DRAFT SMP Prepare Restoration Plan (Ecology Grant Agreement Tasks 4.1) 963 Goals and Objectives 964 Develop a restoration plan that can assist the City in meeting the SMA guidelines far achieving no net 965 loss of ecological function and long-term improvement in function on a watershed basis. The Restoration 966 Plan will support this goal by: 967 • Meeting the requirements of the guidelines; 968 • Using state-of-the-science methods and tools for systematic, comprehensive, and process based 969 landscape characterization and restoration planning; and, 970 • Incorporating options for alternative, incentive-based approaches for restoration that result in greater 971 environmental benetits at lower long-term costs. 972 Approach 973 974 975 976 An assessment or opportunities far restoration will be based on the inventory/characterization, WRIA Salmon Recovery, Puget Sound Action Agenda, and will include identification of: • Areas where future uses should be designed to allow or encourage restoration, including assessment of options for incorporating incentives for restoration in regulatory provisions 977 •� Potential strategies for mitigating development impacts through off-site (or out-of-city) mitigation 978 that will focus on the areas of greatest ecological productivity, if on-site mitigation is not 979 effective or appropriate 980 • Opportunities to manage public lands for ecological restoration Gry of Bremerton SMP Update 26 (/g_2g_(Jy Scope of Work 981 982 983 984 Assumptions f'or Task 4.1 • Bremerton Staff will arrange for consultation and coordination with city staff, Ecology, other agencies and adjacent jurisdictions and will forward an integrated set of comments to the Consultant. 985 Consultant Deliverables 986 987 .. .. .; • Draft Restoration Plan with Maps for Ecology, public, and agency review; (Ecology Task 4.1 Due to Ecology August 31, 2011). Delivered to Bremerton Staff: July 30, 2011. • Final Restoration Plan with revisions responding to Bremerton staff review; (Ecology Task 4.1). Delivered to Bremerton Staff two weeks after receipt of compiled comments. 990 Bremerton Deliverables 991 992 993 994 • Bremerton Staff will e-mail the Final Restoration Plan electronic file to the Ecology project officer and prepare an SMP Submittal Checklist (Ecology Tasks 4.1 and 4.2: Due date August 31, 2011). Assumptions for Task 41 995 • Bremerton Staff will arrange for consultation and coordination with city staff, Ecology, other 996 agencies and adjacent jurisdictions and will forward an integrated set of comments to the 997 Consultant. Consultant will provide one revision to the Final Plan submitted to Ecology. 998 Task 4.2: Revise Draft SMP, Cumulative Impact Analysis, and No Net Loss Report 999 1000 (Ecology Grant Agreement Tasks 4.2 and 4.3) Goals and Objectives 1001 Following review of the Draft Plan by the City and Ecology, as well as completion of the initial 1002 cumulative impact analysis, this task will assist the City in preparing a revised SMP, revised cumulative 1003 impacts analysis on the revised SMP, and prepare a final report. This report will include a section 1004 demonstrating how no net loss of ecological function will be achieved. 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 The finalized SMP will provide the report that the City can use in the local adoption process. Approach Division of Labor: • Bremerton staff will be in the primary role of: ■ Providing input based on the Phase 3 Technical Memoranda and Public Involvement to establish the basic framework to allow the Consultant team to develop an initial draft of the SMP; ■ Conducting the public involvement effort, with tlie support of the Consultant team; ■ Making additional text changes to the Consultant Draft SMP through the public involvement, Planning Commission and City Council review process; and ■ Administering the fonnal processes for review and adoption. Crry oJ l3remerton SMP Upda(e Scope of Work �� 08-18-0) 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 • The Consultant will ■ Prepare an initial draft of the policies and regulations city staff review (and Ecology review if tirnely) and respond to one set of comrnents; ■ Finalize the Cumulative Impacts Report and Restoration Plan; ■ Prepare an initial draft of the Environmental Checklist and Determination of Non- Significance using the SEPA/Growth Management Act (GAMA) integration procedure in WAC 197-11-210; ■ Provide additional technical input and proposals far SMP provisions as public, Planning Commission and City Council questions are raised. • Agencies will be will be involved in providing formal input on the proposed SMP both through the City of Bremerton adoption process and the Ecology review and approval process. 1027 Environmental analyses will be concurrent with and an integral part of the planning and decision making 1028 under GMA consistent with the SEPA/GMA integration procedures of WAC 197-I 1-210 through 235. 1029 Integrating SEPA throughout the decision-making process will provide participants in the process with 1030 the information needed to make informed choices at each stage of the process. 1031 The Consultant will prepare a Draft Environmental Checklist and Determination of Non-Significance 1032 using the SEPA/GMA integration procedure in WAC 197-11-210. City staff will make revisions if 1033 needed to reflect changes to the initial draft. 1034 Consultant Deliverables 1035 • The Revised SMP report to include the inventory and characterization; revised policies, 1036 regulations, and environmental designations; revised cumulative impact assessment; final 1037 shoreline jurisdiction maps; and a section that explains how the program will result in no net loss 1038 of function. Delivered to Bremerton Staff: September 15, 2011. 1039 • Draft Environmental Checklist and Determination of Non-Significance using the SEPA/GMA 1040 integration procedure in WAC 197-11-210. Delivered to Bremerton Staff: September 15, 2011. 1041 • The Final SMP report incorporating City review comments, to include the inventory and 1042 characterization; revised policies, regulations, and environmental designations; revised 1043 cumulative impact assessment; final shoreline jurisdiction maps; and a section that explains how 1044 the program will result in no net loss of function. Delivered to Bremerton Staff: October 25, 1045 2011. 1046 • Final SEPA Environmental Checklist with revisions responding to Bremerton staff review. 1047 Delivered to Bremerton Staff: October 15, 2011. City staff will make revisions if needed to 1048 reflect changes to the initial Consultant draft of Policies and Regulations. 1049 Bremerton Deliverables 1050 • Bremerton Staff will e-mail the Revised SMP and Final Cumulative Impact Analysis with Map 1051 electronic file to the Ecology project officer and 1 prepare an SMP Submittal Checklist (Ecology 1052 Tasks 4.2 and 4.4; Due date October 31, 2011). Citv of Bre�na�7on SMP Upda�e 28 OS-?8-09 Scope of Work 1053 Assumptions Task 4.2 1054 • Changes between the Preliminary Cumulative Impact Analysis and the Final Analysis will reflect 1055 specific policies and regulations in the Shoreline Master Program. There will be no changes to 1056 the basic structure and organization of the previous report or to findings related to programs other 1057 than the SMP. 1058 • Bremerton Staff will arrange for consultation and coordination with city staff, Ecology, other 1059 agencies and adjacent jurisdictions and will forward an integrated set of comments to the 1060 Consultant. Consultant will provide one revision to the Draft SMP and Cumulative Impact 1061 Analysis. 1062 1063 1064 PHASE 5: LOCAL SMP ADOPTION PROCESS 1065 (Ecology Grant Agreement Tasks 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7) 1066 Goals and Objectives 1067 Division of Labor: 1068 • Bremerton staff will take the primary responsibility for the local adoptions process including: 1069 ■ Assembly of the complete draft SMP with a tracking mechanism for revisions to respond to 1070 public, agency, Planning Commission and City Council contributions 1071 ■ Coordinating informal Ecology review of draft SMP documents 1072 ■ Issuing formal SEPA documentation 1073 ■ Provide GMA 60-day notice of intent to adopt 1074 ■ Conducting the public involvement effort 1075 ■ Making additional text changes to the Draft SMP through the public involvement, Planning 1076 Commission and City Council review process 1077 ■ Making revisions required to Technical Memoranda to respond to changes in the SMP after 1078 the initial Consultant Draft 1079 1080 1081 1082 ■ Submittal of adopted SMP to Ecology together with the submittal checklist • The Consultant team will provide additional technical input and evaluate comments on SMP provisions as public, Planning Commission and City Council questions are raised to the total hourly budget provided. 1083 Consulta�tt Deliverables 1084 • Attendance at Public Meetings, Planning Commission meeting, City Council meeting 1085 • Technical input and evaluation of specific comments on SMP provisions referred by Bremerton 1086 Staff limited to the total hourly budget provided. 1087 Bremerton Deliverables 1088 • All procedural requirements for consideration and adoption of SMP Gry of Brc�mer�taa SMP Update 29 0$-Z$-Oy Scopc of'Work 1089 • Revisions to the Environmental Checklist and Determination of Non-Significance using the 1090 SEPA/GMA integration procedure in WAC 197-11-210 if needed to reflect changes to the initial 1091 Consultant draft during Review/Adoption Process 1092 • Publication of Determination of Non-Significance, response to comments and related actions 1093 Assirmptions 1094 • Assume attendance at 2 public meetings, 1 Planning Commission meeting, and 1 City Council 1095 meeting. 1096 Crlv of Bi emerla� SMP Update 30 OS-?g-Oy Scope of Work MILESTONES /DELIVERABLES ; PLAN ;DATE ; Monthly progress reports to Bremerton Beginning of each month Shoreline jurisdiction memo and preliminary maps — draft 10/20/2009 Public Participation Plan draft 10/20/2009 Review of existing SMP — draft memo 10/20/2009 SMP checklist to Ecology (Bremerton) 10/31/2009 Inventory and characterization — data sources, preliminary map folio 2/28/2010 Inventory and characterization analysis - Inventory Characterization Report 5/31/2010 SMP checklist to Ecology (Bremerton) 5/31/2010 Community goals, policies, regulations, designations — Draft SMP Report 12/31/2010 Cumulative effects analysis and NNL report 4/31/2011 SMP checklist to Ecology (Bremerton) 5/31/2011 Restoration Plan 8/31/2011 Revised SMP, CIA, NNL, Jurisdiction maps 10/31/2011 Local adoption process (SEPA review, 60 -day GMA notice, public meeting, adopt SMP and submit to Ecology) — primarily Bremerton deliverable 2/28/2012 SMP checklist to Ecology (Bremerton) 2/28/2012 Bremerton SMP Exhibit C Parametrlx, Inc. 411108th Avenue NE, Sulte 1800 Bellevue, WA 98004 PMX Salary 200912011 Grade 200912011 1.7 Technician 8 Junior Planner /Scientist 9 Specialist 10 Planner /Scientist 1 11 Planner /Scientist 2 12,13 Planner /Scientist 3 14 Planner /Scientist 4 15,16,17 Senior Planner /Scientist 18,19 Program Manager 20 Corporate Manager Invoiced costs may be less Than the low rate shown period classification, but cannot exceed the NTE rate period classification. 200912011 200912011 200912011 200912011 Direct Labor Overhead Fixed Fee All Inclusive Hourly Races 195.84% 30.00% Billing Raie Low NTE NTE Low NTE Low NTE Low NTE 7.09 23.77 24.96 13.89 48.88 2.13 7.49 23.10 81.32 14.82 26.41 27.73 29.02 54.31 4.45 8.32 48.29 90.36 16.47 29.35 30.82 32.25 60.35 4.94 9.25 53.67 100.42 18.29 32.61 34.24 35.82 67.06 5.49 10.27 59.60 111.57 20.33 36.23 38.04 39.81 74.50 6.10 11.41 66.24 123.95 22.59 44.50 46.73 44.24 91.51 6.78 14.02 73.61 152.25 27.33 49.19 51.65 53.52 101.15 8.20 15.49 89.05 168.29 30.06 66.44 69.76 58.87 136.62 9.02 20.93 97.95 227.31 40.01 81.17 85.23 78.36 166.91 12.00 25.57 130.37 277.71 48.42 100.00 105.00 94.83 205.63 14.53 31.50 157.77 342.13 Invoiced costs may be less Than the low rate shown period classification, but cannot exceed the NTE rate period classification. ' Client#:319834 PARAMINC 4s-7 ACORDTM CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 10/28/2014 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND.THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT:If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed.If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Colleen MacLafferty Kibble&Prentice,a USI Co (PilliC,N o,Ext):206-441-6300 FAX(A/C,No): 610-362-8518 601 Union Street,Suite 1000 a DRESS: CLCertRequest@usi.biz Seattle,WA 98101 'INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURER A:Massachusetts Bay Ins Co 22306 INSURED INSURER B:Hanover Insurance Company 22292 Parametrix,Inc. INSURER C:Employers Ins Co of Wausau 21458 1002 15th St.SW,Suite 220 INSURER D:XL Specialty Insurance Company 37885 Auburn,WA 98001-6502 INSURER E Allmerica Financial Benefit Ins 41840 . INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: K1/K2 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP INSR WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY X X ZD2893486904 11/01/2014 11/01/2015 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISESaoccu RENTED $1,000,000 CLAIMS-MADE X OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $10,000 X WA Stop Gap/EL PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $Included 1 POLICY X J CT X LOC , WA Stop Gap $1,000,000 E AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY X X AW2889472704 11/01/2014 11/01/201 COMBIaccideNEDnt)sWGLE LIMIT $1,000,000 (Ea X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURYPer accident) $ AUTOS AUTOS ( NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE X HIRED AUTOS X AUTOS (Per accident) $ 1 $ B X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR X X UH2891561604 11/01/2014 11/01/2011 EACH OCCURRENCE $10,000,000 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE XS of GL,Auto& I AGGREGATE $10,000,000 DED I RETENTION$None Employers Liab. $ C WORKERS COMPENSATION X WCCZ91447422014 11/01/2014 11/01/2015 X TO Y LIM IT OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N TORY LIMITS ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE States:CO ID IL E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1000000 000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N N/A > > (Mandatory in NH) NM OR UT E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below USL&H included for above states+WP E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 D Professional DPR9717903 11/01/2014 11/01/2015 $1,000,000 Per Claim Liability Pollution Legal $1,000,000 Aggregate Claims Made Liability incl. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/.LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,if more space is required) 553-1896-088-Shoreline Master Program Update.City of Bremerton is Additional Insured and coverage is primary and non-contributory as respects General Liability if required by written contract per attached endorsements. , CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION Cityof Bremerton SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN Financial Services ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Attn:City Clerk 345 6th St,Suite 600 AUTHORIZED REPRESENdTAATIVVEEtO Bremerton,WA 98337-1873 eal �)e (* ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010/05) 1 of 1 The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD #S13603441/M13601434 CNMJU ZD2 8934869 04 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY SPECIAL BROADENING ENDORSEMENT This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SUMMARY OF COVERAGES 1. Additional Insured by Contract, Agreement or Permit Included 2. Additional Insured - Broad Form Vendors Included 3. Aggregate Limit per Location Included 4. Alienated Premises Included 5. Bodily Injury Redefined Included 6. Broad Form Property Damage- Borrowed Equipment, Customers Goods& Included Use of Elevators 7. Extended Property Damage Included 8. Incidental Malpractice (Employed nurses, EMT's & paramedics) Included 9. Knowledge of Occurrence Included 10. Liberalization Clause Included 11. Medical Payments- Increased Limit $ 10,000 12. Mobile Equipment Redefined Included 13. Newly Acquired or Formed Organizations-Covered until end or policy period Included 14. Non-owned Watercraft 51 ft. 15. Personal Injury- Broad Form Included 16. Product Recall Expense - Each Occurrence Limit $ 25,000 -Aggregate Limit $ 50,000 17. Property Damage Legal Liability(Fire, Lighting, Explosion, Smoke or Leakage Damage) $500,000 18. Supplementary Payments Increased Limits - Bail Bonds $ 2,500 - Loss of Earnings $ 300 19. Unintentional Failure to Disclose Hazards Included 20. Unintentional Failure to Notify Included This endorsement amends coverages provided under the Commercial General Liability Coverage Form through new coverages, higher limits and broader coverage grants. 1. Additional Insured by Contract, Agreement or (2) Premises you own, rent, lease or occupy. Permit This insurance applies on a primary basis if Under Section II -Who Is An insured, Paragraph 5. that is required by the written contract, is added as follows: written agreement or permit. 5. a. Any person or organization with whom you b. This provision does not apply: agreed, because of a written contract, written (1) Unless the written contract or written agreement or permit to provide insurance, is agreement has been executed or permit an insured, but only with respect to: has been issued prior to the"bodily injury", (1) "Your work"for the additional insured(s) "property damage", "personal injury"or at the location designated in the contract, "advertising injury". agreement or permit; or Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission. Copyright, Insurance Service Office, Inc. 1998 421-0080 (01/03) Page 1 of 6 (2) To any person or organization included as (4) Repackaging, unless unpacked solely for an insured by an endorsement issued by the purpose of inspection, us and made part of this Coverage Part. demonstration, testing, or the substitution (3) To any person or organization included of parts under instruction from the as an insured under item 2 of this manufacturer, and then repackaged in endorsement. the original container; (4) To any lessor of equipment: (5) Any failure to make such inspection, ad- justments, tests or servicing as the (a) After the equipment lease expires; or vendor has agreed to make or normally (b) If the"bodily injury", "property dam- undertakes to make in the usual course age", "personal injury"or"advertising of business in connection with the sale of injury" arises out of sole negligence the product; of the lessor. (6) Demonstration, installation, servicing or (5) To any: repair operations, except such (a) Owners or other interests from whom operations performed at the vendor's land has been leased which takes premises in connection with the sale of place after the lease for the land ex- the product; pires; or (7) Products which, after distribution or sale (b) Managers or lessors of premises if: by you, have been labeled or relabeled or used as a container, part or ingredient of (i) The occurrence takes place after any thing or substance by or for the you cease to be a tenant in that ' vendor. premises; or c. This insurance does not apply to any insured (ii) The "bodily injury", "property. person or organization, from whom you have damage", "personal injury" or acquired such products, or any ingredient, "advertising injury"arises out of part or container, entering into, accompany- structural alterations, new con- ing or containing such products. struction or demolition operations performed by or on 3. Aggregate Limit Per Location behalf of the manager or lessor. (1) Under Section III - Limits of Insurance the 2. Additional Insured -Broad Form Vendors General Aggregate Limit applies separately to each of your"locations"owned by or rented to Under Section II -Who Is An Insured, Paragraph 6. you. is added as follows: (2) Under Section V - Definitions, definition 23. is 6. a. Any person or organization with whom you added as follows: agreed, because of a written contract or 22. "Location" means premises involving the written agreement to provide insurance, but same or connecting lots, or premises whose only with respect to"bodily injury" or connection is interrupted only by a street, "property damage"arising out of"your roadway,waterway or right-of-way of a rail- products"which are distributed or sold in the road. regular course of the vendor's business, subject to the following additional exclusions: b. The insurance afforded the vendor does not 4. Alienated Premises apply to: Under Section I - Coverage A, paragraph 2. Exclu- sions,(1) "Bodily injury" or"property damage"for j. (2) is replaced in its entirety with the which the vendor is obligated to pay dam- following: ages by reasons of the assumption of li- (2) Premises you sell, give away or abandon, if the ability in a contract or agreement. This "property damage" arises out of any part of those exclusion does not apply to liability for premises and occurred from hazards that were damages that the insured would have in, known by you, or should have reasonably been the absence of the contract or agreement; known by you, at the time the property was (2) Any express warranty unauthorized by transferred or abandoned. you; (3) Any physical or chemical change in the 5. Bodily Injury Redefined product made intentionally by the vendor; Under Section V - Definitions, definition 3. "bodily injury" is replaced in its entirety with the following: Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc.with its permission. Copyright, Insurance Service Office, Inc. 1998 421-0080 (01/03) Page 2 of 6 • ZD2 8934869 04 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. Other Insurance— Primary and Non-Contributory (Additional Insured) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART The following is added to Section IV—Commercial General Liability Conditions 4. Other Insurance (a) That is Fire, Extended a. Additional InsuredsBuilder's If you agree in a written contract, written Coverage, Risk, Installation Risk or agreement or, permit that the insurance provided to any person or organization similar coverage for included as an Additional Insured under your work , Section II — Who is An Insured, is (b) That is Fire insurance primary and non-contributory, the for premises rented to following applies: the Additional Insured or temporarily occupied by the Additional If other valid and collectible insurance is Insured with permission available to the Additional Insured for a • of the owner; loss we cover under Coverages A or B (c) That is insurance of this Coverage Part, our obligations purchased by the are limited as follows: Additional Insured to 1.Primary Insurance cover the Additional This insurance is primary to other Insured's liability as a insurance that is available to the tenant for "property Additional Insured which covers the damage" to premises Additional Insured as a Named rented to the Additional Insured. We will not seek Insured or temporarily contribution from any other occupied by the insurance available to the Additional Additional with Insured except: permission of the i. For the sole negligence of the owner; or Additional Insured; (d) If the loss arises out of the maintenance or use ii. when the Additional Insured is of aircraft, "autos" or an Additional Insured under watercraft to the extent another primary liability policy; not subject to Exclusion or g. of Section I — iii. when 2. below applies. Coverage A — Bodily If this insurance is primary, our Injury And Property obligations are not affected unless Damage Liability. any of the other insurance is also When this insurance is excess, we will have primary.Then, we will share with all no duty under Coverages A or B to defend the that other insurance by the method insured against any "suit" if any other insurer described in 3. below. has a duty to defend the insured against that 2. Excess Insurance "suit". If no other insurer defends, we will undertake to do so, but we will be entitled to This insurance is excess over: the insured's rights against all those other (1) Any of the other insurance, insurers. whether primary, excess, When this insurance is excess over other contingent or on any other insurance, we will pay only our share of the basis: amount of the loss, if any, that exceeds the sum of: Page 1 of 2 421-0452 06 07 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Offices,Inc.,with its permission • (1) The total amount that all such other 3. Method Of Sharing insurance would pay for the loss in the If all of the other insurance permits absence of this insurance; and contribution by equal shares, we will (2) The total of all deductible and self- follow this method also. Under this insured amounts under all that other approach each insurer contributes equal insurance. amounts until it has paid its applicable We will share the remaining loss, if any, limit of insurance or none of the loss with any other insurance that is not remains, whichever comes first. described in this Excess Insurance If any of the other insurance does not provision and was not bought specifically permit contribution by equal shares, we to apply in excess of the Limits of will contribute by limits. Under this Insurance shown in the Declarations of method, each insurer's share is based on this Coverage Part. the ratio of its applicable limit of insurance to the total applicable limits of insurance of all insurers. Page 2 of 2 421-0452 06 07 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Offices, Inc.,with its permission KIBBLE & PRENTICE A USI COMPANY CERTIFICATE RETURN MAIL PROCESSING P.O. BOX 5007 NOVATO, CA 94948-5007 CITY OF BREMERTON FINANCIAL SERVICES ATTN: CITY CLERK STE 600 345 6TH ST BREMERTON WA 98337-1873