Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4998 ORDINANCE NO. 'f 918 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending the Comprehensive Plan by adding the Westpark Sub Area Plan, and amending the Zoning Code Section 20.80.080(a) to activate the development standards for dwelling unit density, setbacks, and road standards as detailed in this ordinance. WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act authorizes the preparation of sub area plans; and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has adopted a comprehensive plan under the provisions of Chapter 36.70A RCW that includes policies for the creation of sub area plans, and specifically for the site known as Westpark; and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has zoned the Westpark site a Master Development (MD) Zone, which promotes the creation of public-private partnerships to create large-scale planned developments that provide a clear community benefit and satisfy unique community needs; and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton worked with the Bremerton Housing Authority (BHA), the site's owner, to conduct an extensive public participation and review process for preparation of the Westpark Sub Area Plan and development regulations; and WHEREAS, on January 24,2006 the City of Bremerton issued an addendum to the 2004 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) determining the environmental impacts of the Westpark Sub Area Plan to be within the thresholds evaluated, and WHEREAS, before approval of a preliminary plat for the Westpark redevelopment a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project-level impacts of the proposed development will be completed; and WHEREAS, on October 17, 2006 the Planning Commission held a public workshop to discuss the proposed Sub Area Plan and development regulations, and on November 21,2006 the Commission conducted a public hearing on the plan and concluded their deliberations and made a recommendation for the City Council's consideration; and WHEREAS, on February 7,2007 the City Council conducted a public hearing so that the public had a further opportunity to comment on the sub area plan and development regulations; NOW THEREFORE, 1 Westpark Sub Area Plan THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Comprehensive Plan is amended by the addition of the Westpark Sub Area Plan as presented in Attachment I, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full herein. SECTION 2. Section 20.80.080 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Sub- Area Plans" is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.80.080 SUB-AREA PLANS. The following are identified areas where sub-area plans may be created and unique development regulations created for each: (a) Westpark Sub Area Plan; (adopted by Ordinance No. 'IWf{); (b) East Park Sub Area Plan (adopted by Ordinance No. 4962); (c) Austin Drive Sub-Area Plan; (d) Harrison Employment Center; (e) Northwest Corporate Campus Employment Center; (f) Port Blakely Employment Center. A specific sub-area plan has been adopted and is in effect when the project name listed above is followed by an ordinance number - this ordinance will contain the unique regulations and standards that guide development for that project area. SECTION 3. The City Council accepts and adopts the Findings and Conclusions of the Planning Commission dated November 21,2006 as presented in Attachment II, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full herein. SECTION 4. Severability. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council the 7~.A) day of \ jJ.pj~ .L.L ~ .1.Lr ,2007 2 Westpark Sub Area Plan Approved this /~ l day of ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: GER A. LUBOVI PUBLISHED the /~ ~~) day of \f:~.n t:J .1 , .I EFFECTIVEthe da..uL~ dayof \I1.b1..1..1iJ.A4 ORDINANCE NO. J/i/9f ,2007 ,2007 R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Community Development\Westpark Subarea Plan.doc 3 Westpark Sub Area Plan AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Account # 42742 / Ad # 191735 ST ATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KITSAP I, Sarah Weller, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That she is now, and at aU times embraced in the publication herein mentioned was the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of KITSAP SUN; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County of Kitsap, in which County it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Bremerton, Kitsap County, Washington, a weekly newspaper in Kitsap County, Washington and is now and during all of said time, was printed in an office maintained in the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper; that the following is a true text of a legal advertisement as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said newspaper on the following dates, to wit: , February 13,2007 and that such newspaper was regularly distrihuted to its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $32.56 which amount has not been paid in full. ~.~ (Signature of Principal Clerk) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of February 21, 2007 ~/( Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Kitsap County. ORDINANCE NO. 4998 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council ofthe City of Bremerton, Washington, amending the Comprehensive Plan by adding the Westpark Sub Area Plan, and amending the Zoning Code Section 20.80.080(a) to activate the development standards for dwelling unit density, setbacks, and road standards as detailed in this ordinance. PASSED by the City Council the 7th day of February, 2007 The full text of this ordinance is available from the City Clerk's Office, 345 Sixth Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, W A 98337. February 13, 2007....................AD #20030233 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TABLE OF CONTENTS I - INTRODUCTION Page A. Site Location & History B. Sub-Area Plan Vision C. Organization of Sub-Area Plan 3 3 3 II. WESTPARK SUB-AREA PLAN- Purpose, Process, and Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan A. Local Planning Framework 5 Overview 5 Public Sector Redevelopment Site (PSRS) 5 B. Consistency of the Sub-Area Plan with Bremerton's Comprehensive Plan 6 C. Public/Stakeholder Process 9 D. SEPA/NEPA Environmental Review 11 E. Westpark Design Review 12 Ill. WESTPARK SUB-AREA PLAN A. Existing Site Conditions Critical Areas Summary of Opportunities and Constraints B. Sub-Area Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives C. Sub-Area Plan Elements 1. Land Use 2. Housing 3. Open Space and Parks 4. Roads and Infrastructure D. Future Changes to the Sub-Area Plan 13 14 14 16 18 20 23 24 25 25 IV: ZONING & DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Land Use Zones General Development Standards Streets, Sidewalks, Driveways Parking Landscaping Signs Glossary 27 41 48 54 59 66 68 v: DESIGN GUIDELINES General Site Layout and Building Orientation 71 April 19, 2007 WESTPARK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ='fI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :ii; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - INTRODUCTION A. Site Location & History The 82-acre Westpark site is located in West Bremerton, bounded by Kitsap Way on the north, Oyster Bay Way on the east, and State Route 3 on the west. The existing Westpark public housing community was built in 1941 and is owned and operated by the Bremerton Housing Authority (BHA). The community is the remnant of a larger World War II -era housing project that was built as temporary housing for shipyard workers. The site currently contains 631 residential units, primarily one- story duplex and four-plex in design, and a 60- unit apartment building for elderly and disabled residents. A 72- unit assisted living facility (the Firs II) is currently under construction. Ninety percent or more of existing units are for low income families and individuals. The site also provides community functions (a community center, senior center, teen center, and head start facility) and some local services (laundry, storage facilities, maintenance shop, and administrative offices The surrounding neighborhood contains a mix of residential, commercial and industrial land uses, including auto-oriented and larger retail uses along Kitsap Way. Kitsap Way in this area serves as a "gateway" to the City of Bremerton, though it is currently lacking in definition. B. Sub-Area Plan Vision Thevision for Westpark was created in consultation with stakeholders, residents and neighbors. It used an intensive design charrette process and numerous community meetings, which are summarized in Appendix A. It is also using environmental analysis, including preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS), to master plan the site consistent with environmental constraints and opportunities. The Sub-Area Plan concept is built upon four major goals: 1. Promoting a mixed-use, mixed-income traditional neighborhood. 2. Creating a pedestrian-oriented environment. 3. Maintaining/enhancing view corridors and landscaping. 4. Enhancing the civic realm and creating more usable public open space. The new Westpark is envisioned as an urban mixed-use, mixed-income pedestrian oriented community. It will be characterized by a variety of types and styles of housing to meet the needs of a range of income groups. Accommodating these groups will help to de-concentrate low income housing in Bremerton. Retail and commercial uses will provide for some of the everyday shopping needs of residents, as well as provide some job opportunities for residents. The quantity and type of commercial uses will complement plans for the Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center. The site will be sensitively designed to maintain significant open space and existing trees, to preserve and enhance views, and to carefully manage stormwater and other natural features. New parks, civic spaces and outdoor amenities will be created. Proposed development standards and design guidelines, and covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs), will establish high standards for the quality of redevelopment, yet provide flexibility to respond to market changes and opportunities. The plan will provide high quality infrastructure and services to residents. The Westpark site will relate to the surrounding neighborhood in terms of activities and scale, and provide a catalyst and model for future redevelopment. C. Organization of Sub- Area Plan The Sub-Area Plan is organized in five major sections. Following this Introduction, Section II describes the major objectives of the Plan, and the planning regulatory context it has been created within. The public/stakeholder process and SEPA/NEPA compliance for the April 19, 2007 WESTPARK plan are also described. Section III describes existing site conditions, and the vision, goals and objectives for redevelopment of Westpark. The major elements of the sub-area plan -- land use, housing, parks and open space, roads and infrastructure are described in narrative and graphics. This section will become an element of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan. Section IV contains the zoning and development standards that will apply to Westpark, including regulations for uses, density, building heights, setbacks and similar components of development. Section V proposes design guidelines, which will be used by the Design Review Committee and the City to ensure that Westpark achieves the sub-area plan's VISIOn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VICINITY MAP =~f.= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :ii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RlCE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II. WESTPARK SUB-AREA PLAN- PURPOSE, PROCESS. AND CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Westpark Sub-Area Plan is intended to provide a road map for future redevelopment of the site. It articulates the vision, goals and objectives for redevelopment of Westpark, and embodies the policies of the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan, which it supplements. The Plan also establishes zoning standards and design guidelines which will guide the preparation of future site development plans, subdivisions and building permits by applicants; installation of infrastructure, by Bremerton Housing Authority (BHA) and individual developers; and review of these plans by the City of Bremerton (City) and the Westpark Design Review Committee (DRC). The Sub-Area Plan reflects many elements of the Redevelopment Master Plan for Westpark that is being prepared by the Bremerton Housing Authority. It is also responsive to the identification of environmental impacts contained in the Westpark EIS. A. Local Planning Framework Overview The Westpark site has been the subject of several City legislative actions over the past few years, and was also addressed specifically in the City's recent adoption of its updated Comprehensive Plan and zoning code in 2004. These actions have provided a framework for planning redevelopment of the site. In September 2003, the City amended its Community Renewal Plan, pursuant to the state Community Renewal Law (RCW 35.81), to incorporate the Westpark site as a "blighted" area for purposes of community renewal efforts (Ordinance No. 4830 and 4870). The designation was supported by findings thatthe site was isolated from adjacent areas that building size and design were deficient, and that physical deterioration was a contributing factor to disinvestment in the area. These actions also reaffirmed the City's intent to cooperate and assist the Bremerton Housing Authority in the redevelopment of Westpark, (pursuant to RCW 35.83), and to provide a framework for redevelopment in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations. This framework is described below. Public Sector Redevelopment Site (PSRS) The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates Westpark as a Public Sector Redevelopment Site (PSRS). These are special, large-scale sites with high potential for development that is innovative or that meets a unique community need. They should be developed consistent with specific district planning efforts that address the site, compatibility with surrounding uses, and consistency with the Compo Plan. A PSRS must have a clearly defined community benefit, such as meeting a public housing need. They may include mixed type residential development with an open space component and secondary commercial or office development. Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center The Comprehensive Plan also designated a neighborhood center for the Oyster Bay Area adjacent to the Westpark site, on both sides of Kitsap Way. This 37-acre center is seen as redeveloping over time -- in conjunction with, but slower than Westpark -- into an urban, pedestrian-friendly area connected with the surrounding area by trails and open space, including access to the shoreline. The Center would include a core, with mixed-use (residential and commercial) buildings. The Center would receive support from Westpark's residents and workers; on-site land uses should be planned to complement redevelopment of Oyster Bay. Specific Area Plans The Comprehensive Plan anticipates that more detailed area-specific plans will be developed to implement Public Sector Redevelopment Sites, such as Westpark. Key aspects of these plans include: a process that involves the community, April 19. 2007 WESTPARK ~ U Z IbJ:LJl ~ l0'J ,= ~ Z o U ~ ~ ~ iLJUl I~_' u o A-f! 1;::"::'=::1 ~, iUI~l ~ o if"-, r,;;.~ I;-:._____J ;;o.o~ ,=-dJ '" 1;::::::=--==::1 o 0 1:=:==::1 t::--==:) Z -~-~I ~ Y i~1 ~ If==' U ~Jq ~ ~ >, u z ~ pi ~ ,= ~ 'Z 2, o U ~ ~ ~ Ih!Ul U o ,ac; rQ-, PL21 ~ o r9=o ra::, '::J ,=:::1 19-1 o 0 =, =, z o = Pi U ~q ~ consistency with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, and inclusion of development standards and design guidelines. The Westpark Sub-Area Plan is such a specific area plan and has been developed to meet these requirements. The relationship to the Comprehensive Plan goals is discussed below. B. Consistency of the Sub-Area Plan with Bremertons Comprehensive Plan Bremerton Comprehensive Plan - Centers Concept The city's updated Comprehensive Plan is based on a "Centers" concept, in which a significant portion 5?f the City's future growth will be guided to numerous Centers designated throughout the City. Centers vary in scale, function and character, and each is intended to be a distinct district or "village" with a unique character. Designated centers range from the City Center, which provides a wide range of activities that serve the entire City and the region, to smaller neighborhood centers, which provide goods and services and amenities to residents within a neighborhood. In general, centers are intended to be mixed-use, pedestrian- friendly, well designed areas, with open space, public gathering places, access to transit and adequate infrastructure. Shaping Bremerton Themes 1. Distinctive Growth, with Viable Neighborhoods and Centers that Provide Greater Choice and Convenience. Redevelopment of Westpark would help to revitalize an existing neighborhood that is characterized by outdated, deteriorated housing . and infrasfructure, and has been designated as "blighted!' The new Westpark neighborhood would be characterized bymixed- use development, a wide range of housing options affordable to a mix of income groups, ample open space and amenities, pedestrian accessibility, quality design, imp'roved infrastructure and enhanced environmental resources. Some everyday goods and services, and local employment opportunities, would be provided on-site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Enticing New Development, with a Focus on the Downtown Regional Center. The Bremerton Housing Authority is working closely with the City and the broader community to shape a plan for Westpark that fits the site and is responsive to the City's requirements and needs, including economic development, housing opportunities and compatibility with the nearby Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center. The City's updated Comprehensive Plan and development regulations provide guidance and flexibility for large public parcel development proposals like Westpark. 3. Supportive Transportation, with Seamless, Efficient and Varied Choices. Regional transportation facilities bounding the Westpark site include SR 3, Kitsap Way and Oyster Bay Road. SR 3 is a four-lane, north-south freeway serving Central Kitsap County. Kitsap Way is a five-to-seven lane, limited access principal arterial that connects West Bremerton to Central Kitsap County (via SR 3). SR 3 and Kitsap Way intersect just northwest of the Westpark site. Access to the site is provided by Oyster Bay Avenue, Russell Road (a portion of which is currently closed for construction), Arsenal Road and McNeal Avenue. Kitsap Transit provides public transit service to the City of Bremerton. Routes No. 24 and 26 serve the Westpark site, with stops along Kitsap Way (Route 24) and at the Firs Apartments on Oyster Bay Avenue (Route 26). Service on both routes has one-hour headways. Kitsap Way has a designated bicycle lane, wide shoulders, raised sidewalks on both sides, and painted crosswalks with pedestrian call buttons. A mid-block pedestrian crossing is located east of Oyster Bay Avenue. Oyster Bay Avenue includes raised sidewalks on one side of the street. Two intersections of Kitsap Way - at Oyster Bay Avenue and Pershing Avenue -- have relatively high accident rates (based on the last three-year average) . ~ ..IIIl. B .:.~p REMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :ii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Existing levels of service at major intersections meet City of Bremerton standards. Those experiencing the highest delays are Kitsap Way at Marine Drive, and Kitsap Way at the SR 3 southbound ramps. 4. Improved Accessibility, especially for the Pedestrian. The Westpark site is being planned to support multiple transportation modes, including vehicles (through adequate access and parking); transit (through higher urban densities and access to the regional road system); and pedestrians (by integrating trails and pedestrian amenities in a mixed-use development pattern). 5. Quality Housing, with Broader Choices. Existing housing at Westpark is old and deficient; the Comprehensive Plan and several City ordinances have identified the site's housing as substandard and in need of revitalization. The redeveloped Westpark would provide between 600 and 800 housing units in a variety of types and styles, including single family attached and detached (duplexes, townhouses, clustered cottages), condominiums and apartments. Units would be for sale and for rent, market-rate and public housing. All existing public housing units would be replaced either on-site (190 units) or off-site, which would be consistent with the City's desire to disperse public housing. 6. Business Support, with Increased Opportunity. Westpark would contain approximately 50,000 square feet of retail, commercial and office development, much of it located in mixed-use buildings. These businesses would provide local jobs and goods and services for residents of Westpark and the surrounding neighborhood. Westpark's residents would also provide market support for existing and new commercial development in the Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center. 7. Environmental Management, Integrating Natural Systems. The plan for Westpark includes 28 acres of parks and open space, and retains many existing significant trees; disturbed areas of the site will be landscaped. This open space and vegetation provides habitat for species of urban wildlife, as well as recreational opportunities for local residents. Environmentally critical areas located on and adjacent to the site (such as wetlands) will be protected consistent with City regulations. Stormwater will be controlled and treated consistent with City requirements. 8. Community Service, Focusing on Assets Westpark will install new infrastructure on the site; facilities will be provided concurrent with development. The Westpark EIS will evaluate the service demands of the new population and help ensure that any adverse impacts are addressed. 9. Design Review: Advancing quality urban development. The WestparkSub-Area plan includes development standards and design guidelines that will apply to all future development on the. site. These standards, and City review of future applications, will ensure that future development is of high quality and meets expectations. The BHA will also develop Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that will also apply detailed design requirements to land and buildings throughout the site. Community Character Goals CCI Demonstrate excellent urban design qualities in new development. Redevelopment of the site will replace old, substandard housing with modern dwelling units and mixed-use buildings. The Sub-Area Plan contains design guidelines that are intended to set high standard for site and building design. CC2 Assure that new development relates to surrounding uses and provides for urban livability. The Westpark site is being master planned and provides compatibility between land uses through careful siting, use of open space and buffering, April 19, 2007 >= U Z ~ [F' ~ ,= ~ Z o U ~ ~ ~ ~W u ~ V i~ A ~l c. d ~ o o i~--==-_:) ~ '~ I~ P--, o 0 1:::::::=:::1 C===:I c.z ~,I o {===-=::I pi U W ~ WESTPARK 7J i~, ,Y-- U Z fUL!l [[=, ~ ,= ~ Z o U ~ W1J ~ I~ U o ~ A 1;::==:) ibfId ~ o 8:::, ~ IO~, :J (g, o 0 =, ,= z o =, [[=1 U iUL--!l ~ and transitions between uses of different intensity. Westpark will function as a traditional community, with a mix of activities that meet the needs of daily life, connected by streets and trails, and enhanced open space, urban amenities and high quality design. The Master Plan also considers land use and scale relationships to the surrounding community, including the Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center. CC3 Provide for a safe, pleasant and rich pedestrian experience. provides a source of beauty and enjoyment for all residents. The Westpark plan includes 28 acres of parks and open space that is integrated into the land use pattern. Trees would be retained or replaced to the greatest extent feasible. The open space plan includes areas for active recreation - including ball- fields, pocket parks, tot lots and gathering places -- and for gathering and passive enjoyment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Westpark would contain 57,000 linear feet of pedestrian walkways and trails. Streets are designed to accommodate pedestrians and to make walking safe, pleasant and convenient. Pedestrian amenities include landscaping, benches, open space, pocket parks and lighting. CC4 Promote the development of areas of special character, encouraging a diversity of communities within the city. Westpark is a large site that presents unique redevelopment opportunities. Its history and status as a 1940's era public housing project with aging and substandard facilities sets the stage for its transformation into a modern, well-designed urban mixed-use community located at a major entrance to the City. Land Use Goals LU 1 Identify and enhance distinctive neighborhoods, communities and centers throughout the City. As noted above, Westpark will be transformed into a modern, well-designed urban mixed-use community. It will be distinct in appearance and character in the City's existing fabric. It will also support development of the Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center planned adjacent to the site. LU2 Integrate an open space system into the land use pattern that increases . the amount of open space, protects Bremerton's natural resources, and LU4 Provide for walkability throughout Centers and neighborhoods. Westpark is intended to be a walkable community, and has integrated the needs of the pedestrian into its land use pattern and transportation system. The plan includes 57,000 linear feet of pedestrian paths and trails, connecting areas of the site with one other and with the surrounding neighborhood. LU5 Designate neighborhood, district, and employment Centers on the Land Use Map that provide mixed-use environments which serve as the primary focus for growth. Westpark is adjacent to the designated Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center and would provide a resident population to support the center's planned growth. LU7 In order to encourage new development to occur in locations and patterns consistent with the Vision(s), Goals and Policies of this Plan - specifically in Centers - remove or revise existing land use designations that would site multi-family uses in locations that do not support the Centers Concept. Westpark includes a mix of multi-family and single-family housing. The proposed location of multi-family housing adjacent to Kitsap Way would support commercial activities anticipated in the Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center. LU 11 Provide for the viability of communities, neighborhoods, and Centers through ro ='fI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :ii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . strategic land use designations and infrastructure provisions. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates Westpark as a Public Sector Redevelopment Site (PSRS). This designation recognizes its public ownership and the public interest in innovative redevelopment that meets community needs. The master plan has been developed through a sub-area planning process, will be compatible with adjacent uses, and will provide a variety of housing types and ownership options that will meet the needs of a variety of economic needs. LU12 Support community-wide access to amenities and services. Westpark will provide open space and recreational amenities that are available to all community residents. The site has also been planned to maintain and enhance views of the water. LU17 Adopt and implement appropriate standards and regulations for stormwater management. The City of Bremerton should adopt and implement regional plans, strategies, and standards as appropriate, including but not limited to the Seattle/King County Storm Water Manual, FEMA maps, and the Puget Sound Action Team's 2000 Water Quality Plan. Stormwater will be managed in a manner consistent with city standards. Water quality treatment will be implemented prior to discharge, and the existing outfall to Oyster Bay will be modified to accommodate flows from Westpark and off-site sources. C. Public/Stakeholder Process The Westpark Sub Area Plan reflects the efforts of many people - city leaders and staff, the many citizens and Westpark residents who turned out for the community meetings and week-long public design charrette: urban designers, architects, traffic planners, civil engineers, environmental specialists, and market consultants to name a few. Community meetings were advertised through a combination of mailed and published notices, posted signs, and newsletters. Westpark residents, neighbors within 300 feet, and the community at large were invited to participate in the process. All residents of Westpark and within 300 feet of the site received written notices and invitations The public process conducted for the Sub Area Plan included the following outreach efforts and comment opportunities: . Four public community meetings: o March 16,2006 o May 12,2006 o June 22, 2006 (EIS scoping included) o September 14,2006 . A week-long design charrette: o May 8-12, 2006 . Two stakeholder's meetings: o April 19, 2006 o July 13,2006 SEPA/NEPA s,coping meetings and EIS meetings: o June 22, 2006 . Bremerton Planning Commission workshops and public hearings: o October 17,2006 o November 21, 2006 . Bremerton City Council public hearings and meetings: o January 24, 2007 o February 7, 2007 April 19, 2007 > U Z w F ~ =1 ~ Z o U ~ ~ ~ f;d~ u o p;/ I~ e I~--==:! :bV1 ~ o o 1;.':'---=:-::1 rr~ 1;=:-'-:':=::1 =~ ,=:!) .A :~I o 0 C:=--=::I ':::::::::=:::1 z -= ~ y I-====:I " l~1 U i~ ~ WESTPARK ~ ~, u z 1h:J:LJ] If=' (S?] I~I (S?] Z o u ~ (S?] W] ILq U o ~, ~, [LoU] W] o A, i;:::::=:=:1 ~ \~I '~ ,;=;:!J A C::==::l o 0 I~ 1~ '2: ~ o = r~ u U [uU) (S?] At each of the meetings, the current status of the design process was presented, and attendees were invited to comment on the design, and to ask questions about the project and the process. The goal of the stakeholder process was to create a vibrant neighborhood that reflects multiple public objectives, with the participation and support of the community as a whole. The content of the public meetings were as follows: Community Meeting #1: March 16,2006- West Hills Elementary School Gymnasium This meeting included presentation of the existing conditions on the Westpark site, along with the proposed process for redeveloping the site. Goals and possibilities for the site were presented, and an invitation for the public to participate in the process of creating the Sub Area Plan document. The timeline and process for the project were presented, and a question and answer session followed. Questions from attendees, mostly eXistmg Westpark residents, were focused on the relocation plan, demolition, and future rent levels for the replaced subsidized housing. Stakeholder's Meeting #1: April 19, 2006- Westpark Community Center This meeting included presentation of the existing conditions on the Westpark site, along with the proposed process for redeveloping the site specifically geared toward those neighboring businesses and agencies affected by the Westpark redevelopment. Retail and commercial components of the project were presented, with a discussion of potential impact to surrounding businesses. The timeline, process and current status of the project were also presented, with a question and answer session following. Questions from the stakeholders included the following topics: project financing; whether land will be sold as a large block, or in individual lots; the anticipated income of future residents; use of design standards; ability to rent units; housing for residents not returning to Westpark; and type of retail development that will face Oyster Bay Avenue. Community Meeting #2 (Design Charrette): May 8-12, 2006 - Westpark Community Center At the Design Charrette, the public had the opportunity to interact directly with the design team over the course of a week while the design was in process, allowing true public input. Each night (with the exception of Thursday) during the charrette there was a presentation and question and answer session, outlining the day's progress. On the final evening, all of the drawings were presented, including the preferred site plan, which was generated through input from each of the agencies and stakeholders involved, along with the many members of the local community that participated. This final presentation served as the "official" public meeting component of the charrette, and was followed by a question and answer session. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Questions raised at the meeting addressed the following topics: replacement of existing streets; density of housing; noise; availability of units for the disabled; phasing of construction; grading of the site; storm water management; sale of lots to individuals. Community Meeting #3: June 22, 2006 - Westpark Community Center This meeting included presentation of the EIS process, along with the proposed process for the environmental approval process. A question and answer session specific to the EIS was held, followed by an update of the overall design process for the site. There was an additional opportunity for questions and answers after the design process update. Questions and comments addressed the following topics: fill proposed for the existing ball field and potential seismic event; timing of construction; communication with residents about project progress; impacts on existing wildlife; questions about the relocation process; kinds of future businesses; lighting; water features; BHA ownership of housing; whether there will be multiple builders for the for-sale housing; and name of the new community. D@ U-B - .1"".. REMERTON HOUSING AUTHORllY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT Iii; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stakeholder's Meeting #2: July 13) 2006 - Westpark Community Center This meeting was geared toward the stakeholders and included an update on the design process for redeveloping the site. Timelines for relocation of the current Westpark residents and construction were presented, with a question and answer session following. Questions from the stakeholders included the status of the grading design; and status of the stormwater system. More detailed documentation of the public process is on file with the City of Bremerton. D. SEPA/NEPA Environmental Review The review process for the proposed re- development of Westpark, and adoption of this sub-area plan, includes preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A single EIS will be prepared to satisfy NEPA and SEPA requirements. The purpose of an EIS is to present information about the environmental consequences of proposals, including redevelopment projects, to consider alternative courses of action, and to mitigate environmental impacts that are avoidable. Presentation of this information in an EIS is intended to ensure that decision makers are aware of impacts to the natural and human environments, and that they consider opportunities to mitigate impacts. The process also provides opportunities for interested agencies, tribes and citizens to comment on proposals and to be involved in their consideration. Compliance with NEPA is required because the project will involve federal action, by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to use federal funds in redeveloping the site. A Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2006. The City of Bremerton, which has been designated as the Responsible Entity (RE) for NEPA compliance, is serving as the NEPA lead agency. Compliance with SEPA is also required because the proposal could significantly affect the environment. A Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice -- declaring that an EIS would be prepared and inviting comments on the scope of the document - was published in the Kitsap Sun on June 6, 2006 The Bremerton Housing Authority is acting as the lead agency for SEPA compliance. A joint SEPA/NEPA Scoping Meeting was held on June 22, 2006 at the Westpark Community Center. The public comment period closed on June 27, 2006. The EIS is being prepared as of this writing. April 19, 2007 i~ I~' U Z py }= ~ C===:i ~ Z (} U ~ W1 ~ r~q IIU-) '"".dI o (r~ 1=_' !b~L~l ~ o "'=~ A :;==:':.::1 o 0 C==::::I I:::=:::=:.i ->> d~1 (} e::.::::--=i fr~1 lJ" ~~ &did ~ WESTPARK liD >, u Z !bY [F (0] = (0] Z o U ~ (0] ~ ILJUl U o ~ ~, ~1d WJJ o (Q-, ~ ::dl ISh, o 0 t::===J =, z o =, [pi U [uy ~ n~ E. Westpark Design Review Committee All new development proposals will adhere to the development review, permitting and design approval processes of the City of Bremerton and the Westpark Design Review Committee (DRC). DRC planning and design guidelines are identified in the Sub-Area Plan. Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R's) will also apply to all property on the site that is sold for redevelopment, to help ensure thai~ all proposals meet relevant requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Bremerton Housing Authority has contracted with a development consultant who is responsible for all development within the boundaries of the project site. The development consultant will assemble a Westpark Design Review Committee (DRC) responsible for the review and approval of all permit applications prior to their submittal to the City of Bremerton. Upon approval the DRC will issue a certificate that will be required to be included with the submittal to the City. Permit applications will not be accepted by the City without the approval of the DRC. The City will maintain its primary authority to review and approve plans for consistency with zoning and development standards, and building requirements, as required by law. In particular, the Design Review Committee will ensure that proposed development is consistent with the intent and specifics of adopted design guidelines, and with any adopted Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) adopted for the Westpark site. =~.= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;i;;.i; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III. WESTPARK SUB-AREA PLAN A. Existing Site Conditions Overview Drainage Stormwater within the site IS conveyed by overland flow and through a rudimentary system of open ditches and enclosed drainage pipes. Outside of the project area, stormwater is conveyed away from the site in open ditches and enclosed drainage systems. Stormwater from the on-site area combines with stormwater from off-site areas in the conveyance systems outside of the project area. There are no known sources of off-site stormwater that is routed through the existing Westpark drainage system. There are no known existing water quality treatment facilities within the Westpark site. Stormwater treatment for the redeveloped conditions on the overall site will be provided in accordance with Title 15.04.042 of the City's The existing 82-acre Westpark site is characterized by steep slopes, with site grades varying between 60 feet and 180 feet in elevation. There are stands oflarge coniferous trees and dispersed ornamental deciduous trees, which will be preserved where feasible. The existing housing units are small, antiquated, and scattered throughout the site with very little connection to the streets, the community or each other. The network of roads provides little connectivity to the larger community, and within the site, which fosters a sense of isolation from the adjacent neighborhoods, and contributes to the impression of Westpark as an island of poverty within the City of Bremerton. I,U';!::>.!1l - nO.IS;' - IM.170 - 1$0.160 :_-~_.....~~ CJ IMI.ISO [=~ 00.\.10 C::J 1~1'13iJ c::J IHl lJ:O c::J lOi}-IHt c::J 'Xl.lHO - till.')!:.. - 7t1.6l,t - 60.70 Figure 1 - Slope Analysis Plan April 19, 2007 WESTPARK z ~ ,d ~I ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ d) ~ 00 c:=::::J c:=::::J =1 z o =1 F U IWl ~ D~ z < d fSb < ~ ~ < ~ @9 ~ ~ 00 r.=:::::J r.=:::::J 1;=::::1 z o !;=::::I F U ~ ~ municipal code. Water quality treatment facilities will be designed based on the King County Surface Water Design Manual as referenced in Division 4 - Storm Drainage of the City's Public Works standards, using Department of Ecology (Ecology) hydrologic simulation software to calculate flow rates and volumes Currently, most of the site discharges through two existing outfalls into Oyster Bay. Peak flow rates routed through these outfalls are expected to increase due to increases in impervious surface, and some possible rerouting of stormwater. Flow control will be provided on-site to mitigate for increases in flow rates and durations at the outfalls into Sinclair Inlet and Ostrich Bay, and for any portions of the on -site areas that discharge through these outfalls. Flow control facilities are not proposed for most of the Sub-Area because Oyster Bay is relatively close to the Westpark site and because the capacity of the existing outfall will be increased as a part of the Firs II project, which is currently under construction. A new outfall structure is proposed near the shoreline to mitigate for the increase in flow rates through the existing Oyster Bay Road outfall. Based on preliminary studies, a new outfall would be more effective and have fewer impacts to marine habitat than other discharge alternatives. It would be designed to accommodate stormwater flows from both the Westpark Sub-area and off-site areas that are routed to the outfall. A new storm drain would be constructed from a nearby manhole to the new outfall structure. The outfall structure would be designed to reduce the velocity of discharged water (stilling basin) and to reduce the erosion potential of adjacent soils (riprap). Transportation Regional transportation facilities bounding the Westpark site include SR 3, Kitsap Way and Oyster Bay Road. SR 3 is a four-lane, north-south freeway serving Central Kitsap County. Kitsap Way is a five-to-seven lane, limited access principal arterial that connects West Bremerton to Central Kitsap County (via SR 3). SR 3 and Kitsap Way intersect just northwest of the Westpark site. Access to the site is provided by Oyster Bay Avenue, Russell Road (a portion of which is currently closed for construction), Arsenal Road and McNeal Avenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kitsap Transit provides public transit service to the City of Bremerton. Routes No. 24 and 26 serve the Westpark site, with stops along Kitsap Way (Route 24) and at the Firs Apartments on Oyster Bay Avenue (Route 26). Service on both routes has one-hour headways. Kitsap Way has a designated bicycle lane, wide shoulders, raised sidewalks on both sides, and painted crosswalks with pedestrian call buttons. A mid-block pedestrian crossing is located east of Oyster Bay Avenue. Oyster Bay Avenue includes raised sidewalks on one side of the street. Two intersections of Kitsap Way - at Oyster Bay Avenue and Pershing Avenue -- have relatively high accident rates (based on the last three-year average) Existing levels of service at major intersections meet City of Bremerton standards. Those experiencing the highest delays are Kitsap Way at Marine Drive, and Kitsap Way at the SR 3 southbound ramps. Critical Areas The Westpark site does not contain wetlands or streams, based on preliminary analysis. These resources are presently adjacent to the site, however, and on-site activities (e.g., stormwater runoff) will need to be managed to protect off- site water quality and habitat. The site's trees and vegetation provide a valuable environmental and visual amenity, but do not provide habitat for designated threatened, endangered or sensitive species. Critical aquifer recharge areas are not present. Some steep slopes areas do occur and will be addressed through site planning consistent with City requirements. ll41 =~~= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;i; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERCER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary of Opportunities and Constraints (along Kitsap Way), are within convenient walking distance and are accessible from the surrounding community. Westpark residents would provide economic support for on-site and off-site services. . The site is not significantly constrained by critical areas (e.g., wetlands, streams, fish and wildlife habitat, aquifer recharge areas). It does contain some steep slope areas that will need to be stabilized and carefully engineered. . Mature landscaping and significant trees are present on the site. These features are valuable amenities and provide opportunities for integration into a system of parks and open space. The site contains a concentration oflow income housing. The sub-area plan will replace a portion of low income housing on-site, and will disperse some low income to other areas of Bremerton and Kitsap County . Some important neighborhood services - e.g., police, fire, and a community center -- are present on-site or in the immediate vicinity. Based on natural features, site location and expressed public and private planning objectives, the Westpark site possesses significant opportunities for redevelopment. There are also a number of constraints that will be addressed through the sub-area planning and master planning processes. . The site's topography is varied and dramatic. Three high points within the site would most likely create beautiful views towards Oyster Bay. . Westpark is bounded by State Road 3 and Kitsap Way. These two primary roads carry high volumes of traffic, which creates a perceptible level of noise within the site. . A five-minute walking distance (quarter- mile radius) is often used as a benchmark for planning traditional neighborhoods. Most of the site, and portions of the planned Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center commercial area Figure 2 - Opportunities and Constraints Diagram April 19. 2007 WESTPARK z < d @;b < ~ < n @Q) ~ ~ 00 ~ r.==::1 ~ z o ~ F U Ib!!::2l ~ n~ z < d ffb ~ ~ ~ < fi @9} ~ (0] 00 =1 c=::::j =1 z o c=::::j p U ~ (0] B. Sub-Area Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives The vision of the Westpark Sub-Area Plan is to provide a modern, mixed-use, mixed- income, pedestrian-friendly and amenity-rich neighborhood for residents, neighbors and visitors. Redevelopment will create a particular kind of place n one that provides space for the community to gather and interact. Streets, plazas and other public spaces will all be designed with the care and attention to detail required to make them function as the "living rooms" of the new Westpark. The pedestrian oriented design is reflected in a clearly defined "main street", small-scaled blocks, and pedestrian-scale buildings that front directly on landscaped streets. Water features or public art parks, and stands of significant trees also contribute to this definition. In addition, a sequence of open spaces linking Oyster Bay Road to the retail area on Arsenal Way will contribute to the pedestrian experience. The sub-area plan's overall goals and objectives include the following: 1. To promote a Mixed-use, Mixed Income Neighborhood . To promote a liveable, walkable community through traditional neighborhood-making principles . To provide a varied set of housing and lot types to promote a mixed income neighborhood . To encourage development of new neighborhood retail along Arsenal Way and at the intersection of Kitsap Way and Oyster Bay Road . Connect to and re- use existing infrastructure where appropriate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. To Create a Pedestrian Oriented Environment . To conceal retail parking in the middle of blocks to enhance the public realm for pedestrians along the street . To place residential garages off of alleys and encourage front porches to create pedestrian oriented residential streets . Improve pedestrian and bicycle connections within and outside of the Westpark site . Encourage the use of public transit . Provide and enhance bike trails through existing wooded and landscaped areas 3. To maintain and enhance existing VIew corridors and landscape . Take advantage of views north to Oyster Bay . Maintain and enhance trees and landscape along the south side of Kitsap Way and through the center of the site . Develop public neighborhood parks and greens adjacent to existing landscape features and views fi@ =~.= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT =ii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER,- THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. To enhance the civic realm and create more useable public open spaces. 5. To integrate low impact development approaches into the site master plan. o Reduce street widths where appropriate to help reduce impervious surfaces o Maintain and integrate open space into the site plan o Investigate stormwater design that uses bio swales and infiltrates stormwater where appropriate o Provide an enhanced area around the community center and existing outdoor amenities o Enhance and integrate the existing fire station into the neighborhood and main street concept area - Create smaller pocket parks throughout the neighborhood to promote walkability and security o Improve and create parks and civic spaces April 19, 2007 WESTPARK z < ,d ~I < W ~ < fi @J ~ ~ 00 = = ~I z o = ~ U w ~ 11~ z < d rfb < ~ ~ < ~ @8 ~ W] 00 I=i I=i I=i z o I=i ~ U ~ W] Open Space Goals . Create parks that enhance the community and encourage and support social interaction. . Create open spaces easily accessible to residents. . Create parks that appeal to a wide range of age groups. A diversity of park types should be established to offer a diversity of passive and active uses. . Use the 'eyes-on-the-park' to create safe active environments. Lighting, layout and visibility are key factors in the design of active parks. . Parks should have trash and recycling bins that meet the needs of the users. . Use resilient materials that reduce maintenance costs. . Increase community partIcIpation through direct access for residents from their homes to adjacent parks. . Create public viewing areas. . Provide for an Urban Trail through the natural area and along Kitsap Way. . Provide for wildlife through preservation and enhancement of the natural area. Westpark's landscape will also serve to enhance the site's architecture and relate to the local environment. The topography of the site allows for varied relationships of architecture and landscape, which will be distinguish among neighborhoods. Open and accessible spaces, and convenient seating will encourage human interaction and create a safe and visible environment for children. Pedestrian scale lighting will enhance the streetscape, alleys and parks. Narrower streets will calm traffic and protect pedestrians. C. Sub-Area Plan Elements The Westpark Sub-Area Plan addresses the following elements: 1. Land Use, including the master site plan map and identification of major land uses. 2. Housing, including the expected number of for-sale, rental, market rate and low income units; and planned densities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Open Space, landscaping and amenities. 4. Roads and Infrastructure, including vehicular and non-vehicular circulation systems, storm water management and site utilities. The proposed Master Plan for Westpark IS illustrated in Figure 3. Westpark will be a mixed-use, mixed income community drawing on the best of traditional neighborhood design and the rich history of Bremerton, while employing modern amenities and taking advantage of the topography, landscape and views. The intent is to build a warm community, where neighbors interact and walk on beautiful tree-lined residential streets, and where pedestrian circulation is prioritized over automobile traffic. The areas of the site where retail is proposed will be designed to be lively, energized and will have a "village main street" feel about them. The Land Use Plan is loosely based upon a grid of interconnected streets that provide multiple routes to any destination. This configuration allows easy pedestrian and vehicular circulation throughout the neighborhood by spreading out traffic loads. Sidewalks, street trees, and appropriately scaled street lights and furniture will provide richly detailed streetscapes. A unique sense of place will be created through the arrangement of vibrant public spaces, a clear hierarchy of pedestrian-friendly streets, a balanced program of residences, retail services, offices, community buildings and spaces, as well as an architecture that responds to the northwest vernacular. Buildings that line public spaces will enclose and frame the public realm, and connect to one another at the scale of the pedestrian. Foremost, Westpark will be a residential community, offering numerous types, styles and sizes of residential units types, at varying densities, to meet the community's housing needs and to accommodate a spectrum of income fit;) =,.= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT Ii;: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER:- THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . groups. The heart and center of the community will be the Summit Park, a large open space which will provide opportunities for active recreation and passive enjoyment of significant vegetation. Residential neighborhoods will the line the park. Smaller parks and open spaces will be located throughout Westpark's neighborhoods, and plazas and more "urban" spaces will be co-located . of office), some of which will have plazas and other urban open spaces. The site's more intensive land uses - including larger, high density residential buildings, and a retail/commercial village n will be located along the site's outer edges, closer to (but buffered from) major arterials. All of the site's activities, however, will be within a convenient walk or bike-ride via Westpark's system of paths and trails. Different land uses will be arranged compatibly in distinct neighborhoods, and in mixed-use buildings (e.g., residential with ground floor retail r---- Figure 3 - Illustrative Plan April 19, 2007 WESTPARK z :5 @..-I ~ f!-S~ ~ < ~ (eQ) ~ ~ 00 1:=:::::1 ~ C=::::I z o ~ p U w ~ n~ ~ ~ Id ~ ~ g~ ~ ~ n @9 ~ l01l 00 c::=:::l c::=:::l c::=:::l ~ o c::=:::l LF U IP~ l01l 1. Land Use Figure 4 indicates the locations of proposed land uses by block. Block-level graphics are used in the Sub Area Plan and Development Standards to help tailor applicable requirements to the site's topography and design concept. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The general arrangement and location of land uses in Westpark are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Figure 3 is the Westpark Master Plan. ~ 0 o r -, , , , i , , , , M :r: N J NEIGHBORHOOD PARK C t= Street E EI treet D Dl Street Cl Figure 4 - Land Use Plan ~ '" LAND USE \\ / ~ \--" LEGEND D Low Density Residential D Med. Density Residential D High Density Residential 1M] Village Commercial D Mixed-Use I D Mixed-Use 2 D Public Open Space - Existing Building =~LI\l= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT Iii; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mix of Land Uses Westpark will be redeveloped in phases with a mix of land uses that will create a community. The types and amounts of proposed land uses are summarized in Table 1. Residential uses - including single family attached and detached in a variety of designs, and multi- family - will predominate. Retail and service uses will also be provided to meet the everyday needs of residents; these activities would support the more diverse, larger scale commercial activities occurring along Kitsap Way, in the designated Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center. Some activities - retail! commercial and residential would occur in mixed-use buildings. More intensive and larger- scale land uses (retail, commercial, and larger multi-family buildings) will generally be located closer to the site's boundaries, transitioning to residential and open space uses in more central portions of the site. Westpark also desires to maintain the flexibility to possibly expand on-site retail activities in the future, in response to changes in market conditions. Refer to page 25 for requirements for future changes to the Sub-Area Plan. TABLE 1. WESTPARK LAND USE LAND USE ACRES UNlTS/SQ!]ARE FEET Residential 759 du's (range of 600-800) - Single family I 31.5 499 du's _ Multi-family L 5.6 260 du's Retail/Commercial 5 Approx. 50,000 SF Community/Civic Open Space/Parks/Trails ** 28 acres (excl. trails) S treets/Infr astructur e Notes: 1. Single family includes attached townhouses, duplexes and cottages, and detached units. 2. Multi-family includes apartments and condo units. Some multi-family units will be included in mixed-use buildings (e.g., with retail or commercial uses). Density Westpark is planned as an urban community with urban densities. The density of residential development would range from 12 dwelling units per acre (for detached single family) to 65 dwelling units per acre (for the most intensive multi- family), varying with the type of unit. Gross density would be 9.5 dwelling units per acre, and average net density would be 15 dwelling units per acre. Refer to Figure 5 for recommended density by block. Average net density would be used as a target to monitor the achievement of urban densities for the sub-area as a whole. Individual projects must be within the range that is specified for the type of residential unit in the Sub-Area Plan's development standards. Variations in density are anticipated throughout the site, subject to the limits in the development standards. April 19, 20D7 z: < d ~ < ~ ~ < fi ~ :~ ~ 00 1'---.(\ t::=:::J C==I z: o C=::=:I F U ~ ~ WESTPARK :go BLOCK CAPACITY }~ '", --" z < d ffb rM r-l t I 1 I < 39:D~ REC. : : I I I t cJ , , Ib!!dl , "-l , P< ~ , ::::J Cl < ;:: ~ @9 :t N ~ ~ ~ NEIGHBORHOOD ~ PARK 00 I;:::::::::J :.GU C ,-] cJ I;:::::::::J "-l P< II~ ::::J ~~ Z 25 DU REC. Cl ~ 0 Street E El ~ u F "-l P< ::::J U Cl s Ib!!dl freet 0 ~ D Dl 24 DU REC. g "-l ooP< treet cell 13DU ::::J J REC. Cl i;i ~P< Figure 5 - Block Capacity Plan ~ ='iIl= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT Iii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX .J 0 D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Housing will be demolished as part of redevelopment and will include a mix of rental duplexes, townhouses and apartments. A total of 190 replacement low-income units are proposed on-site. All other existing low income units will be replaced off- site, at various locations in Bremerton and Kitsap County; there will be no net loss of low income units as a result of redevelopment. The BHA is developing a detailed plan for replacement housing. All existing Westpark residents in good standing will be eligible for new units, either on- site or off-site. Housing Program Westpark will include a mix of for sale and rental units, and market rate and public/low income units. The planned number of units by type is shown in Table 2. The total number of housing units developed could range from 600-800; the current program is based on an estimated 759 units. Low income units will be developed to replace a portion of the existing units at Westpark that Table 2. West park Housing Units Unit Type Distribution by Phase # Units per Phase # Units (Approximate, based on: adopted program of 759 units total, Preferred Plan 5/12/06, & requirement for 25% Public Housing Units *) II III IV V Total Market Rate Apartments 0 110 0 0 110 Urban/Loft Condominium 0 65 0 0 65 Condominium 0 85 0 0 85 16' Townhouse 24 27 20 9 80 22' Townhouse and/or Row Home, Alley Load 30 21 26 17 94 24' Townhouse - 2 and 3 Story 2 28 12 18 60 Duplexes (Rental) 14 50 18 18 100 Duplexes (Market Rate) 2 8 6 14 30 Cluster Cottaaes 10 18 10 0 38 Sinale Family - 3,500 sa ft Lot 17 30 12 0 59 Sinale Family - 4,500 sq ft Lot 7 27 4 0 38 Total Units 106 469 108 76 759 Lots per Phase 106 209 108 76 499 Public Housina Units 38 87 38 27 190 % Public Housing Units per Phase iPHU / # Units) 35.8% ** 18.6% 35.2% 35.5% 25.0% PHU's as % of Total PHU per Phase IPHU / Total PHU's) 20.0% 45.8% 20.0% 14.2% 100.0% April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ z < d Ifb, < fSl:~ ~ < ~ @9 ~ Wdl 00 =i =i =i z o 1= P U Wl Wdl z ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ @9 J ~ 00 C==:I c:=:J 1===:1 z o c:=:J ~ U ~ ~ ~ Dispersing public housing would accomplish a number of goals, including the revitalization of dilapidated housing and distressed communities, creation of diverse neighborhoods, and the promotion of housing choice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Open Space and Parks Housing Relocation Plan More than one-third of the Westpark site (28 acres) will be devoted to various types of parks and open space. As shown on Figure 6, open space and parks will be distributed across the site. Together, they express Westpark's environmental sensitivity, its desire to enrich the health of the community and the individual, and to establish the character of the neighborhood. Landscaping and preservation efforts also offer opportunities for education. School and conservation programs, community work parties and stewardship opportunities will involve residents in preservation and enhancement of their natural environment. Native wildlife will also provide a vital connection with the environment. The BHA is developing a housing relocation plan to stage and coordinate tenant relocation, demolition and construction. It will include providing information and counseling to tenants to help explain plans, timing and available choices. In accordance with federal law, the BHA will also offer a package of relocation options. These may include temporary relocation on-site (in synch with phased demolition and construction), relocation to other BHA-owned projects, and tenant-based vouchers. D c J D o LEGEND _ Screening I Buffer D Existing Landscape to be Retained & Supplemented , NEIGHBORHOO PARK _ Storm water Management Plan , , , , , , I__..J L= _ Sloped Planting Areas Retail Street Tree Planting & Hardscape - Swale - Existing Building Figure 6 - Landscape Plan =~fI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;i: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Roads and Infrastructure Roads & Pedestrian Circulation Westpark's thoroughfare system streets, sidewalks and pedestrian paths, shown in Figure 6 -- is a fundamental element in site design, and will connect areas of the community with each other and to the surrounding neighborhood. The grid-based street design prioritizes pedestrian circulation, while maintaining automobile access for residents and visitors. The grid system provides multiple paths to each home and business, and reduces congestion by distributing traffic across the site. The design and dimensions of major types of streets are addressed in Section IV of the plan, Zoning & Development Standards. In general, streets emphasize narrower widths -- to reduce impervious area and to slow vehicle speed -- and use alleys to separate garages and automobile traffic from pedestrians. Basic streets types include: Neighborhood Streets, which are one-lane or two-lane roads (varying among neighborhoods) with on-street parking. Sidewalks of varying width are provided on both sides of the street. These streets are lined with trees and include landscaping between the street and the sidewalk. Baer Boulevard (Street A), which will provide access to the regional transportation system, is designed as a wider, tree-lined street with two traffic lanes, on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides. Alleys, will provide access to garages for parking and for deliveries and services for Single Family Attached, Single Family Detached, and other unit types as indicated on the Thoroughfare Plan. Pedestrian Paths are "green streets" which are separated from vehicle traffic and provide pedestrian-only connections between Westpark neighborhoods, parks and open spaces, retail activities and services. These paths will also connect to the off-site regional trail system. D. Future Changes to the Sub Area Plan The Westpark Master Plan and Sub-Area Plan is an emerging document, and will likely change incrementally as the design process continues. It will also be influenced by public comment, environmental review, and the decisions of elected officials. A degree of flexibility is desirable and inherent in large-scale, phased master plans; this flexibility provides the ability to respond to changes in demographic, economic and market patterns over time. The Sub-Area Plan map reflects the conceptual master plan for the site as of this writing. Some proposed land use designations allow flexibility in uses, and areas subject to this designation could be proposed for modification in the future. For example, it is possible that Westpark's on-site population, and development of the Oyster Bay Neighborhood Center, could support additional compatible retail development on the Westpark site. The Sub-Area Plan's Mixed Use designation permits retail/commercial as well as residential activities. Any change to the conceptual land use map, if proposed, would entail thorough consideration through a public review process and appropriate environmental analysis. Any change would also need to be consistent with the Sub- Area Plan's goals and development standards. Any significant change to the Sub-Area Plan or development regulations after they are adopted by legislative action of the City Council would require Planning Commission recommendation and City Council approval. April 19, 2007 z ~ ,d ~I < W ~ < ~ @9 ~ ~ 00 I=::i I=::i =1 z o I=::i If=i U ~ ~ WESTPARK ~ z ~ d @b ~ W ~ < ~ (9) ~ (0] = = l;::=:j z o = ~ U w (0] 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ =~~= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;i= TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . SECTION IV - ZONING & DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Introduction This section of the sub-area plan contains the zoning and development standards that will guide the redeveloplI}ent of Westpark and will implement the requirements of the site's zoning designation. The standards address the following elements: . Land uses/zones, including density, height, setbacks, building coverage and impervious surface coverage; . General development standards; . Building design; . Streets, sidewalks and driveways; . Parking; . Landscaping; . Parks and open space; . Signs. The Westpark design guidelines, included in Section V, will work in tandem with the development standards to achieve the plan's vision and to assure high quality development. The current zoning classification for the Westpark site is Master Development (MD) [Chapter 20.80 BMC]. The MD zone is applied to sites envisioned for large-scale planned development. These proposals must meet a public need and provide a community benefit, such as redeveloping "blighted" areas or providing affordable housing opportunities. Projects may be proposed by public entities or public-private partnerships, and should result in innovative development. Proposals in the MD zone are required to prepare a Master Development Plan (MDP), which includes standards for development of the site, including uses, density, setbacks, lot coverage and heights. Other required components of an MDP, which are addressed in these regulations, include the following: . an open space plan that protects natural resources and provides recreational opportunities; . site edge design that is compatible with adjacent uses and densities; . streetscapes that include amemtIes, (street trees, planting strips, benches, street lighting, etc.) and other design features that make streets interactive, walkable and enjoyable; . a general landscape plan, including preservation of significant trees; and . adequate off-street parking, which may modify standard requirements if a parking study demonstrates no impact on adjacent properties. A. LAND USE ZONES 1. Land Use & Dimensional Standards Land us~.~ within Westpark and applicable dimensional standards are identified in Table A-I and Figure A-2 Land Use Map. 2. Residential Intent: The intent of the residential zone is to accommodate a variety of housing types at varying densities consistent with creation of a mixed-income, mixed-use pedestrian-oriented community. Housing types may include single family attached and detached in a variety of styles (duplexes, town homes), apartments and condominiums. Housing may also occur in mixed use buildings. Densities may vary within the residential zone and are indicated by use of a the suffix Low Density, Medium Density or High Density Residential standards shall be in accordance with the standards of BMC 20.60 with the following additions and/or revisions: A. Permitted Uses and Density i. Residential-Low Density. (a) Permitted uses and density: April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ fk!!:JJ Z o N , ~ ~Y ~ :~ ~ z ~' .~ ,_JI :> ,-, z o e:=:::::1 pi U [LlLiJ ~ ~ o 0 (i) Single family attached and detached units, with a maximum density of 12 dwelling units per acre, and a minimum density of 8 dwelling units per acre; (ii) Parks, playgrounds and open space. (iii) Worship and religious facilities less than 10,000 square feet subject to a traffic and parking study and mitigation of impacts to ensure adequate circulation and parking; (iv) Day care facility of 6 or greater persons receiving care, subject to a parking study and a mitigation of parking impacts. (b) Prohibited uses: (i) Group Residential Facilities; (ii) Nursing/Convalescent Homes; (iii) Manufactured Home Park; (iv) Worship and religious facilities greater than 10,000 square feet; (v) Golf Course; (vi) Public Utility Facilities located above ground. ii. Residential-Medium Density (a) Permitted uses and density: (i) Single family attached units, with a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre, and a minimum density of 16 dwelling units per acre; (ii) Civic uses; (iii) Parks, playgrounds and open space. (iv) Neighborhood Business in accordance with BMC 20.82.020; (v) Worship and religious facilities less than 10,000 square feet subject to a traffic and parking study and mitigation of impacts to ensure adequate circulation and parking; (vi) Day care facility of 6 or greater persons receiving care, subject to a parking study and mitigation of parking impacts. (b) Prohibited uses: (i) Group Residential Facilities; (ii) Nursing/Convalescent Homes; (iii) Manufactured Home Park; (iv) Worship and religious facilities greater than 10,000 square feet; (v) Golf Course; (vi) Public Utility Facilities located above ground. iii. Residential-High Density (a) Permitted uses and density: (i) Apartment and condominium buildings, with a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre and a maximum density of 65 dwelling units per acre; (ii) Parks and playgrounds; (iii) Neighborhood Business ill accordance with BMC 20.82.020; (iv) Structured parking; (v) Civic uses; (vi) Senior Housing Complex (block A only) (vii) Worship and religious facilities less than 10,000 square feet, subject to a traffic and parking study and mitigation of impacts to ensure adequate circulation and parking; (viii) Day care facility of 6 or greater persons receiving care, subject to a parking study and mitigation of parking impacts. (ix) Nursing/Convalescent Homes (block A only); (b) Prohibited uses: (i) Group Residential Facilities; (ii) Manufactured Home Park; (iii) Worship and religious facilities greater than 10,000 square feet; (iv) Golf Course; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. Dimensional Standards Standards for height, setback, yards, building coverage and site coverage shall be consistent with Table AI. C. Public Space Requirements The following public space requirements apply only to high density residential development within the R zones: i. Pedestrian-oriented spaces, amemtIes and corridors shall be incorporated in the overall site design. Pedestrian areas shall be easily accessible, clearly visible and located to take advantage of surrounding features such as building entrances, open spaces, =~fI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT =ii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . significant landscaping, unique topography or architecture, and solar exposure. 11. Multiple buildings on the same site shall incorporate public spaces, formal or informal. The buildings should be integrated with site elements such as plazas, walkways and landscaping with pedestrian pathways, to provide clear view to destinations and to create a unified development. 111. Movable chairs and tables shall be utilized in the open spaces and as cafe seating. IV. Planters should be consistent with the overall Westpark architectural styles. it by a minimum of 8 inches. 3. The landing of the lead walk steps at sidewalk should be equal to one stair tread, and never less than 12 inches. 4. Slope of the landing and lead walks shall not exceed 3%. 5. When two sets of stairs are separated by a landing or lead walks both sets of steps shall have consistent tread width. 6. Steps shall have at least two risers and a cheekwall; 7. Cheekwall of the steps at the sidewalk shall align with the edges of landing at sidewalk. ii. Garages & Integral Garages: (a) Except In Residential-Low Density Zone, garage doors of integral garages that are incorporated into residential structures should not face the street. Where garage doors facing the street are permitted, they should be set back from the front facade by at least 16 feet. (b) Integral garage units should have a planting island between every garage and should be planted with a tree, or tall growing shrub. iii. Landscaping: (a) Landscaping shall meet the requirements of Subsection D of these regulations. iv. Roofs: (a) Cornices are required on buildings with flat roofs. They should include a projection no less than 24" vertically above the roof surface, and no less than 4" beyond the Building Face. Cornices shall be sized to be proportional to the building. Flat roofs shall only be permitted on commercial, mixed- use and condominium buildings. v. Building Entrances: (a) Service entrances should be at the rear of the buildings. (b) Entrances to second and third story uses should be located along the street building front. (c) Secondary entrances may be located at the rear and sides of buildings. (d) Ground floor units of apartment and D. Development Standards 1. Residential Frontage Standards. (a) Lead walks, Stairways & Landings (i) Front Yard Grading: 1. The ground should strike a horizontal line at the building facade. 2. Single- Family- Detached homes should transition grade a minimum of 3' from building sides. 3. Slope of front yard shall be between 2% and 5%. 4. Change of grade of the front yards can be accommodated with a maximum of two sets of stairs: One attached to the house stoop and the other at the edge of the sidewalk. (ii) Slope at Sidewalk: 1. Slope of the front yard at edge of sidewalk should not be greater than 1:2 with a maximum vertical height of 30". Slopes greater than 1:2 should be planted with ground cover rather than turf. 2. A change in vertical height greater than 24" requires construction of a retaining wall. (iii) Configurations: 1. Lead walks should provide a direct connection to the front entry and should be a minimum of 3' in width. 2. The edge of a landing should align with the edge of steps, or extend beyond April 19, 2007 WESTPARK W] py Z o N " W] iUU] ~ '=')) ,;:=:::3 ~ 'Z ~-, < ,_J] o 0 :> =, '---;;Y &, o r:::==::1 ff= U iLiy ~ 2JID ~ [UUl Z ~I o N " ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ 10 "/7 L, ~ "" ,--.Jl 00 '~ r~ I::=:=:i z -, o c:::::::::::l pi U ILJL~ ~ condominium buildings should have individual entries from the street. vi. Building Orientation and Design Elements: (a) High density residential: (b) When located at block corners, buildings shall have two primary facades (composed of the same materials) that are oriented to the two streets. vii. Fire Protection Systems (a) Due to the road widths proposed in this plan, all residential units shall be protected by a fire sprinkler system. 3. Mixed Use Intent The intent of the Mixed Use zone is to further the goal of creating a traditional, mixed-use pedestrian oriented community by allowing a complimentary mix of residential and non-residential uses to locate within the same building. Mixed Use standards shall be in accordance with the standards of BMC 20.60 with the following additions and/or revisions: Three mixed-use districts MU -1 and MU - 2 are designated on the land use map. The desired mix and density of uses within each district is described below. A. Permitted Uses and Density i. Mixed-Use 1 (MU-1) (a) Permitted Uses and Density: Medium density residential, at the densities indicated in Table 1, with ground floor commercial uses allowed. (b) Permitted residential uses are those indicated for the Residential zone. (c) Permitted commercial are those permitted in the Village Commercial zone, up to a maximum of 2,500 square feet per individual use. (d) Prohibited uses include those listed in both the residential and village commercial zone and freestanding commercial. ii. Mixed-Use 2 (MU-2) (a) Permitted Uses and Density: High density residential, at the densities indicated in Table AI, and live-work units, with ground floor commercial uses allowed. (b) Permitted residential uses are those indicated for the Residential zone. (c) Permitted commercial uses are those permitted in the Village Commercial zone up to a maximum of 2,500 square feet per individual use. (d) Prohibited uses include those listed in both the residential and village commercial zone and freestanding commercial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. Dimensional Standards Standards for density, height, setback, yards, building coverage and site coverage shall be consistent with Table AI. C. Public Space Requirements The following public space requirements apply only to mixed-use and commercial development within the MU zones: i. Pedestrian-oriented spaces, amellltles and corridors shall be incorporated in the overall site design. Pedestrian areas shall be easily accessible, clearly visible and located to take advantage of surrounding features such as building entrances, open spaces, significant landscaping, unique topography or architecture, and solar exposure. ii. Multiple buildings on the same site shall incorporate public spaces, formal or informal. The buildings should be integrated with site elements such as plazas, walkways and landscaping with pedestrian pathways, to provide clear view to destinations and to create a unified development. iii. Movable chairs and tables shall be utilized in the open spaces and as cafe seating. iv. Planters should be consistent with the overall Westpark architectural styles. ~ =~~= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;i; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX .. . . . 48 . . . . . . . . . . . .. 41 .. . . <<I . . . . . . . . . . D. Development Standards i. Building Orientation and Design Elements: (a) When located at block corners, buildings shall have two primary facades (composed of the same materials) that are oriented to the two streets. (b) Mixed-Use Buildings longer than 60' should be designed to look like more than one building. Each section of building shall be different in color than the other sections. (c) Live-Work first floors in the MU - 2 Zone shall have a minimum 10' floor to ceiling on the first floor. (d) Mixed-Use buildings along Oyster Bay and Arsenal Way, Baer Boulevard and Paradise Road should be clad in masonry (stone, cast stone, or brick), stucco, EIFS, corrugated metal, or cementitious board in board and batten configuration. (e) A minimum of 50% of the Live-Work facade should be masonry, stucco, EIFS, or metal clad. (f) Awnings are permitted directly above commercial uses. (i) They should consist of a metal structure covered with fabric. (ii) Awnings may have a front skirt, but the bottom of the skirt should not be scalloped. (iii) Awnings may include logos and text but shall not be backlit. ii. Roofs: (a) Cornices are required on buildings with flat roofs. They should include a projection no less than 24" vertically above the roof surface, and no less than 4" beyond the Building Face. Cornices shall be sized to be proportional to the building. Flat roofs shall only be permitted on commercial, mixed- use and condominium buildings. iii. Building Entrances: (a) Service entrances should be at the rear of the buildings. (b) Entrances to second and third story uses should be located along the street building front. (c) Secondary entrances may be located at the rear and sides of buildings. (d) Ground floor units of apartment and condominium buildings should have individual entries from the street. iv. Fire Protection Systems (a) Due to the road widths proposed in this plan, all mixed-use units shall be protected by a fire sprinkler system. 4. Village Commercial Intent Promote attractive, unified, and viable commercial businesses. Promote pedestrian activity, safety and security while still providing adequate auto and truck access. Allow the establishment of a flexible site plan that is adaptable to market conditions and capable of being phased. A. Permitted Uses & Density: i. The following uses are permitted provided they do not exceed 10,000 square feet gross floor area: (a) Finance, insurance and real estate; (b) Medical and dental; (c) Personal service; (d) Restaurant; (e) A maximum of two drive-through facilities; (f) General office and business service; (g) Public administration; (h) Community facility; (i) General retail; (j) Residential uses in mixed-use buildings; (k) Day care; (1) Entertainment use; (m) Museum and gallery; (n) Physical fitness and health club subject to the following criteria; (i) When greater than 5,000 gross square feet, consistent with parking requirements ofBMC 20.48.080; and (ii) When greater than 5,000 gross square feet consistent with the design guidelines of Section V of the Sub-Area Plan; and (iii) When greater than 5,000 gross square feet a traffic and parking study is prepared and adverse impacts are mitigated per the study. April 19, 2007 t;7)) ~Llj z o N , t;7)) rUUl ~ ~ ~ Z < ,d 00 > !~I z o = [f=1 U ~LJl ~ WESTPARK JlD ~ r~ Z o N , ~ lULl] ~ ,~ 'I 1=:::/ D Z ~: ,d '~ ~ ,= z o ,= fL_, r- U [Uul (01) ~~ (iv) Shall not exceed a maximum of 10,000 gross square feet. (0) Worship and religious facilities, subject to the following criteria; (i) Consistent with parking requirements of BMC 20.48.080; and (ii) Consistent with the design guidelines Section V of the Sub-Area Plan; and (iii) A traffic and parking study is prepared and adverse impacts are mitigated per the study. (p) Hotel and lodging place or bed and breakfast containing ten (10) or fewer guest rooms; (q) Grocery stores greater than 10,000 gross square feet, subject to the following criteria; (i) Consistent with parking requirements of BMC 20.48.080; and (ii) Consistent with the design guidelines of Section V of the Sub-Area Plan; and (iii) A traffic and parking study is prepared and adverse impacts are mitigated per the study. (r) Fully screened, building mounted wire- less telecommunication facilities. B. Prohibited Uses: " 0 1. Adult entertainment; ii. Stand alone or tower mounted wireless telecommunication facilities; iii. Check cashing and Pay Day lender businesses as defined per section IV. iv. Automobile sales, service repair or car wash; v. Work release facilities; vi. Storage of equipment and materials; vii. Light and heavy industrial/manu- facturing uses; viii. Commercial parking not serving a permitted use; (a) Gas station; (b) Hotel and lodging place with greater than ten (10) guest rooms; (c) Drinking place not associated with a restaurant; (d) Group residential; (e) Foster home; (f) Stand alone parking structures. C. Dimensional Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i. Standards for height, setback, yards, building coverage and site coverage shall be consistent with Table A-I. D. Building Height. i. Two stories are preferred, however, one to three stories are allowed. ii. Minimum height 18 feet, except for buildings bordering on Arsenal and Baer Boulevard where the minimum height shall be 22 feet, maximum height 50 feet. iii. At floors above the second level, buildings shall step back at least two feet minimum from the first and second story building face and include a change of material above the second story. iv. Building focal points do not need to be set back. E. Public Space Requirements i. Pedestrian-oriented spaces, amemtles and corridors shall be incorporated in the overall site design. Pedestrian areas shall be easily accessible, clearly visible and located to take advantage of surrounding features such as building entrances, open spaces, significant landscaping, unique topography or architecture, and solar exposure. ii. Multiple buildings on the same site shall incorporate public spaces, formal or informal. The buildings should be integrated with site elements such as plazas, walkways and landscaping with pedestrian pathways, to provide clear view to destinations and to create a unified development. iii. Movable chairs and tables shall be utilized in the open spaces and as cafe seating. iv. Planters should be consistent with the overall Westpark architectural styles. =~q= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;i; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. .- . . . . . F. Development Standards buildings or terraced parking lots. iv. Outdoor lighting standards. The following standards apply to all uses and development within this zone: (a) Except for intermittent security lighting on motion detectors, all lights more than seven feet above the ground shall be directed downward. The fixture's housing must be totally opaque. Clear or refractive lenses shall not extend below the housing. (b) Large areas may be lit with a number of low-intensity sources close to the area requiring illumination. Illumination of a large area with a remote single source of light shall be avoided. (c) Lighting shall not be cast beyond the premises and shall be limited to illumination of surfaces intended for pedestrians or vehicles. Illumination of landscaped areas shall be avoided unless lighting is part of the landscape area immediately around the building. (d) Pole lights shall be no taller than 20 feet above a 36 inch base in parking lots and traffic areas and no taller than 12 feet in pedestrian areas. v. Site furnishings. Incorporate outdoor furniture, fixtures, and streetscape elements into the site design that enhances and complements the commercial functions of the site. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural design and landscape. The following requirements will assure consistency in site furnishing design and are applicable to all non-residential uses. The following standards shall apply: (a) Utilize lighting, free standing signs, trellises, arbors, raised planters, benches and other forms of seating, trash receptacles, bus stops, phone booths, fencing, or other outdoor furniture or streetscape fixtures in the site design to create and define public spaces. (b) Locate site furnishings to maximize visual surveillance of the area by residents, pedestrians and passing vehicles to minimize covert activities in the space and lessen risks to public safety. i. Site development shall be in accordance with the standards of BMC 20.66.060 with the following additions and revisions: (a) General Site Design (i) Sites shall be developed in a coordinated manner, complementing adjacentstructures through placement, size and mass. (ii) Buildings shall be arranged to facilitate plazas, courtyards, greens, and other pedestrian use areas. (iii) Sites shall be designed to create an identifiable pedestrian urban character. Methods to achieve this concept include: (iv) Orienting buildings to front on streets, and placing parking lots at the rear or sides of buildings. (v) Providing well-defined pedestrian walkways from parking areas, public sidewalks, and building/shop entrances throughout the site. (vi) Designing the parking areas to avoid long rows of uninterrupted parking. (vii) Designing parking areas to be partially screened from view from adjacent streets and building occupants while taking security into consideration. 1. Where possible, sites shall be designed to provide vehicle and pedestrian connections to adjacent sites and activity areas. (viii) Due to the road widths in this plan, all Village Commercial structures shall be protected by a fire sprinkler system. G. Development of Lots i. Buildings and parking lots shall be designed to fit natural slopes rather than re-grading the slope to fit a particular building or parking lot design. ii. Cuts and fills on a site shall be balanced and finished grades shall not include any retaining walls greater than six feet. Instead, designs shall complement and take advantage of natural topography. lll. Sloped lots may require multileveled April 19, 2007 WESTPARK (0] [U~ Z o N , (0] rw (0] '::1 I~ o z < =-5: o 0 '~ I~ 1:-==::::) :z ~...:_j o l::=:::::i " Lr=:I U ruLJ] (0?] 33~ ~ py z o N , ~ py ~ ')j ,:=::d rD Z % ~~I ,d o 0 '~ I~ e:=:::=:J z o c:::::::::J [Fi U fh!1dJ ~ :w (c) Site furnishings should be a commercial grade designed for heavy public use. Lightweight resin, wire or iron furniture as typically sold for residential use is strongly discouraged. (d) All umbrellas shall be made of fade- resistant canvas or mesh fabrics or materials which filter sunlight. commercial area to provide shelter from the elements. vi. Awnings are permitted directly above commercial uses. (a) They should consist of a metal structure covered with fabric. (b) Awnings may have a front skirt, but the bottom of the skirt should not be scalloped. (c) Awnings may include logos and text but shall not be backlit. vii. All primary building pedestrian entrances and storefront windows must face onto the primary street not the parking lot (secondary entrances and windows are encouraged on the facade facing rear parking). viii. When located at block corners, buildings shall have two primary facades (composed of the same materials) that are oriented to the two streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H. Building Orientation and Design Elements i. Blank walls shall not face streets. Liner buildings with primary building facades shall be used to screen blank walls from the street. ii. Buildings shall generally follow the alignment of the streets they front. However, buildings may be set back up to 15 feet from the front property line when this setback area is to accommodate building entries, outdoor cafe or other pedestrian-oriented activities and use. The IS-foot setback may be increased by up to 5 additional feet to accommodate additional pedestrian-oriented space. iii. A minimum of 80 percent of the ground floor space of each building shall consist of pedestrian oriented retail uses or a compatible building use drawing people. When applications comprising more than a single building, including mixed use buildings, are submitted to the city simultaneously, the 80 percent requirement may be applied to the entire development instead of on a building- by-building basis. iv. Multi-level buildings with commercial, office, or residential use are strongly encouraged to create a more clearly-defined street edge and to provide upper-story activities which overlook the street and plazas. Clearly defined and convenient access to the second story should allow economic viability for commercial uses and/or separate entrances for residential uses. v. Canopies, awnings, porches, building overhangs and arcades are required along at least 75 percent of building fronts facing Arsenal and Baer Boulevard streets in the I. Architectural Building Character i. Design Intent. To create a collection of buildings that presents a unified character while allowing for the individual architectural expression of each building. The design character of an individual building should be compatible with (share similar features such as color, scale, massing and height) with its neighbors but may also include other features or characteristics that are different. ii. Applicants shall demonstrate how proposed buildings are similar to or dissimilar from neighboring buildings, including those across the street, with regard to: (a) Building forms and massing; (b) Rooflines and parapet features; (c) Special building features, such as signs, artwork, special canopies, landscaping elements, entries, etc.; (d) Building fenestration, the size, orientation, and treatment of windows and glazed areas; (e) Materials. iii. Building Scale - Design Intent. (a) To create a consistent building scale =~~= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;;.:; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHII'-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . (I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . throughout the commercial center. (b) To provide a consistent architectural scale throughout which is appropriate to a pedestrian environment. (c) To create a concentration of buildings near the plaza and along the street. (d) To achieve an inviting and interesting set of buildings with distinctive character. (e) To ensure that the buildings present a varied response to streets and public spaces. (f) To create strongly identifiable elements and civic gathering places that encourages a sense of community. (g) To encourage use of good quality materials with a low life-cycle cost. iv. Building Modulation and Articulation. (a) In order to prevent long stretches of monotonous facade, buildings over 40 feet in length, as measured parallel to a street or parking lot, shall be divided along the facade abutting a public street or parking lot at regular intervals. (b) Buildings should be articulated to break down the scale and have the varied look of a number of buildings. (c) Building masses and edges along the street shall be articulated with windows, entryways and vertical and horizontal elements that provide interest. (d) Modulation and articulation shall be accomplished in several ways, including: (i) The stepping back or projection of a portion of the facade. (ii) Include significant building elements, such as balconies, porches, canopies, towers, entry areas, etc. (iii) Building focal points, which include distinctive entry features, etc. (iv) Changing the roofline. (v) Changing materials. (vi) Using other methods acceptable to the city. J. Building Elements and Details. i. All building sides facing public streets and plazas shall incorporate a substantive use of building elements, such as those from the list that follows, as approved by the city to achieve a pedestrian scale both in the commercial and residential areas. (Substantive in this case means a significant contribution to the form and character of the building. Note that decorative shall mean exhibits special craftsmanship or distinctive design that adds visual interest and/or unique character.) ii. Modulate building elements through treatment of windows, doors, entries, and corners with special trim, molding or glazing. iii. Decorative building materials such as tile and metal work. iv. Enhanced or articulated building entrances (recessed or covered). v. Pergolas, arcades, porches, decks, bay windows, dormers. vi. Balconies in upper stories. vii. Multiple-paned windows. viii. Decorative railings, grill work, or landscape guards. ix. Landscape trellises. x. Decorative light fixtures. xi. Where real or simulated brick, stone, stucco or similar materials are used on the primary facade(s), the material should continue along the secondary facades a minimum of 16" in depth measured from the face of the primary fa<;:ade. xii. Storefront windows with glazing over at least 75 percent of the front facade of the ground floor between the height of two feet and 10 feet above the ground along main commercial streets. xiii. Multi-story structures with balconies overlooking the street. Balconies not only help to articulate the building facade and create a sense of visual interest, they also contribute to the liveliness of the street scene and foster a sense of neighborhood security as people watch the street scene below. xiv. Other details or elements as approved by the city. K. Building Roof. i. Design Intent. To unify the village center's design character through roof design, April 19, 2007 ~ PLll Z o N , ~ ~ ~ (~l ,:=::!J o f~_, Z < I~I o 0 > .:==:::::! z O. L./ ::=::::....:.:::1 [Fi U i!-JUl ~ WESTPARK :;)] \0] [uy Z o N , \0] w ~ :J o r__1 Z ~(" ~, ,----51 > 1:=::':':':::1 z o i;'=::-'-:::I lP= U ~ ~ ~ materials and color. ii. Roof designs should provide unifying elements. It is recommended that buildings have consistent roof slopes, details, materials and configuration wherever possible. iii. All roofs exposed to view from a public right-of-way shall have a minimum slope of six feet vertical to 12 feet horizontal, however, portions of roofs not visible from a public right-of-way may be flat or have a lesser slope. iv. Roof mounted mechanical equipment (HVAC) shall be screened from view with similar design as provided in the structure. v. Cornices are required on buildings with flat roofs. They shall include a projection no less than 24" vertically above the roof surface, and no less than 4" beyond the Building Face. Cornices shall be sized to be proportional to the building. Flat roofs shall only be permitted on commercial, mixed-use and condominium buildings. L. Materials. o 0 i. Design Intent. To enhance the quality of both individual buildings and the commercial center streetscape as a whole. To encourage the use of traditional forms, details, and good quality materials with low life cycle costs. ii. The materials of building elements such as roofs (where exposed to view), exterior walls, trim, and other miscellaneous elements, should be durable yet should also possess a traditional character. iii. The use of materials which provide textural interest is encouraged for both roofs and walls (precast concrete, masonry, brick, ornamental steel, metal panels, wood siding). iv. Corrugated metal siding and plywood siding should not be used as primary materials for exterior walls. v. Windows shall have clear glazing only. Mirrored or reflective glass shall not be used. vi. No tilt-up type (e.g., industrial building) concrete buildings will be allowed. Exposed concrete shall be finished with design patterns and colors compatible with surrounding buildings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M. Colors. i. Design Intent. To create design unity, a sense of place, and community identity. ii. The basic building shell may be earth tones, light green, taupe, brown, red-brown, cream, white, natural wood, brick, stone, or similar colors. iii. Trim should be of contrasting tones or colors. iv. Accent colors shall not cover more than 10 percent of any building facade. N. Service Areas. i. Design Intent. To screen service and utility elements from view while providing efficient serVIce areas. ii. Building service elements and utility equipment should be contained within the building envelope so as not to encroach on pedestrian areas. iii. All on-site service areas, loading zones, waste storage, disposal facilities, transformer and utility vaults and similar activities shall be located in an area not visible from a public street or open space. If this is not possible, then the service area, loading zone, or storage area must be screened from public view. Acceptable screening includes: iv. Materials matching the adjacent building wall. v. A solid hedge or other screening as approved by the city. Note: Chain link fencing with/without slats is not permitted. vi. Service/utility areas or enclosures shall not be located in or be visible from the public plaza or courts. o. Drive- Thru Facilities. i. Drive-thru facilities proposed are subject to the following standards: (a) The drive thru shall be located only at =~f.= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :U; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the side or rear of the building; (b) The drive aisle serving the drive thru shall not encircle more than 75 percent of the building circumference to which the drive thru serves; (c) The drive thru, including drive aisle, shall be screened by two-and-one-half-foot tall solid structural wall constructed of materials matching the building exterior walls or solid hedge. The intent is to screen cars queuing up and at the drive thru from the adjacent public street. P. Check Cashing and Pay Day Lender Business i. Check Cashing and Pay Day Lender Businesses are defined as follows: (a) Check Cashing are those businesses primary engaged in cashing payroll, government, personal, and other types of checks, while taking a commission off the face-value of the check; (b) Pay Day Lender businesses are those businesses primarily engaged in providing small cash loans based on a borrower's personal check held for future deposit or on electronic access to a borrower's bank account. Generally, the borrower must include the fee for the loan in the face value of the personal check; (c) Check Cashing and Pay Day Lender Businesses do not include Charter Financial Institutions such as banks, credit unions, mortgage lenders and savings and loan associations. April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ (0] [ULJl Z o N , (0] :uq W2J ::J a z ___1 ~ ~, 1:=--=21 o 0 ~ ,;:;?, =, z --, o C=:::::::i [i= U ITdld W2J W] w Z o N , W] w W] :J rQ ~ ~ ~, !--~l > ,= '2 ~, 5. Density and Dimensional Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table A-I Density and Dimensional Standards 00 land Use/Zone Density Maximum Front Yards Maximum Maximum (Net dwelling Height Yard Side/Rear Building Site units per acre) (Building Coverage Coverage Setback) Min/Max (ft) RESIDENTIAL Low Density 8-12 dulacre 35 feet 5110 5/5 60% 70% (2.5 stories) Medium Density Up to 30 45 feet 5/15 0/5 90% 95% dulacre (3 stories) High Density Up to 65 55 feet 10/15 0/5 90% 95% dulacre (4.5 stories) MIXED USE MU-1 Up to 65 55 feet 10/15 5/5 90% 100% du/acre; + (4.5 stories) up to 2,500 SF of non- residential use permitted on the ground floor facing public street MU-2 Up to 65 55 feet 5/10 3(1)/4(2) 90% 95% du/acre; + (4.5 stories) up to 2,500 SF of non- residential use permitted on the ground floor facing public street VillAGE Up to 0.5 FAR 50 feet 12/15 515 45% 95% COMMERCIAL o C::::==:i P' U [Lf~ W] (I) Zero- Lot - Line units may reduce the side yard setback to zero, as long as the total dimension between unattached units equals at least six (6) feet (meaning the adjacent lot has a setback of six (6) feet). (2) Where garage is integral to the unit (underneath), and there is no rear yard, the minimum rear yard setback for enclosed space shall be eight (8) feet except that a deck may encroach within the rear-yard setback area to within six (6) feet of the property line and vertical supports for the deck may encroach to within three (3) feet of the property line. (3) Front yard setbacks are subject to the frontage occupancy requirements of subsection S.B. Development Standards. (4) Side and rear yard setbacks are subject to additional requirements contained in subsection S.B. Development Standards. (S) Where Table A-I and Figure B-2 differ, Figure B-2 shall govern. ~3 =~fI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT Iii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LAND USE f\ J~ \ \ \/~ FIGURE A-2 LAND USE MAP LEGEND J 0 0 (0)) pq Z 0 N , (W)) Il-JUj (0)) '-:J (:=J' N r,?-1 ID NEIGHBORHOOD Z PARK -~ ~ CJ '1 ::=-:::::,1 o 0 ~~ ~ , r", ,::.....~=:I c-z g-, El 0 1::=::=:'1 treet fl_r r- D U Dl fh-~ ~ treet Cl D Low Density Residential D Med. Density Residential D High Density Residential II1II Village Commercial D Mixed-Use 1 D Mixed-Use 2 D Public Open Space Existing Building April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ f0] f1::J:U] z o N , WdJ ~U] WdJ ::J Q Z ~ ~, cd 00 ~> !~ r::=:=:i 2:, o !::=:=::i F' U [uq f0] aJ@ BLOCK CAPACITY FIGURE A-3 DENSITY MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . }~ ~ 0 o rM r-t I I I I 39:D~ REC. : : , ' , , , :M 14DU REC. o "-l cr: :J Q '" :r: N NEIGHBORHOOD PARK c/\$/ Gi i 0 \; :: ~ L_...J P:; , :J 25 DU REC. Q 1= r!c-- CI--- ~ Street E El u "-l cr: :J Q o Street D Dl =''1= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;i; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B.DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS General Development Standards General Development Standards shall be in accordance with the standards of BMC 20.44 and 20.46 with the following additions and/or reVISiOns: Fenestration i. The following standards apply additional architectural requirements for Mixed - Use Buildings along Oyster Bay, Arsenal Way, Baer Boulevard and Paradise Road. (a) Glazed surface (window surface area) for buildings along Oyster Bay Arsenal Way, and Paradise Road should be at least (70) percent of the first floor fayade. On all other primary frontages where retail is used, at least sixty (60) percent of the first floor fayade should be glazed. (b) Glazing must be at least seventy (70) percent transparent. (c) The maximum height of the sill above the sidewalk should be eighteen (18) inches along Oyster Bay and Arsenal Way. All other commercial should have a maximum height of sill above sidewalk of thirty (30) inches. (d) Maximum percentage of glass that may be blocked with interior fixtures or paper signs along Oyster Bay and Arsenal Way or other commercial streets is twenty (20) percent. (e) Maximum height above sidewalk that any retail glazing may be blocked with wood fixtures is four (4) feet from the exterior ground line. Building Height i. Building height is defined as the distance from the average finish grade to the highest point of a flat roof or midpoint of the slope on. Refer to Figure B-1. ii. Tower elements may exceed the maximum building height by 12'. iii. Raised basements may not exceed 1/2 of a story or 5 feet in height along the front facade. iv. Maximum height for structured parking (parking garages) is five stories (6 levels). v. Figure B-2 Building Height Map identifies areas of the site where specific building heights are encouraged - such as along Arsenal Way and portions of Baer Boulevard -- to help define the street and to enliven the retail area. Figure B-1 - Building Heights r~ / "Th '!j ~ 5, ~ ~ ~ Pit.;:hed RQof J ..c: "" .~ .:: .. ;.;:t :'::l .'i! ""' FIlii R(II)f April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ W) ~ < W) Z ~ F ~ F Z ~ ~ ~I o d ~ > ~ W) I~ :z ~ z ~ v o 0 > I;::::=::::J Z o ==:j [f=:1 U ~ ~ 4.lll (0'] (bd) ~ ~ Q Z < p (0'] p z [~ ~ ~ o d IWl > IWl Q d :2 IWl Z ~ Y > c==:) Z o ~ p U ~ (0'] ~ BUILDING HEIGHT FIGURE B-2 BUILDING HEIGHT MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 J 0 o , ct LEGEND NEIGHBORHOOD PARK D Min. 28 - Max. 45 Feet D Max. 35 Feet r= _ Max. 45 Feet t= D Max. 50 Feet D Max. 55 Feet I I Existing Building c C 1'.,= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :ii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FIGURE B-3 BUILDING HEIGHT MAP FRONTAGE OCCUPANCY & BUILDING SETBACKS J~ LEGEND D 55 - 75 % Occupancy D 70 - 80 % Occupancy D 75 - 85 % Occupancy D 80 - 90 % Occupancy D 90 - 100 % Occupancy l~iI'~H Existing Building NR Not Regulated j 0 o t= --'II f- :;0;. t;: April 19, 2007 c 0JJ Q ~ ~ Q Z ~ F 0JJ If= Z ~ ~ ~ o d ~ > ~ ~ d ~ [~ Z ~ o 00 > r-==:3 z o r-==:3 F U ~ 0JJ WESTPARK till3 ~ Q ~ .~ Q Z ~ F:J ~ F Z w ~ rfb o d W > w Q d ~ W Z w lJ > c=::;t z o c=::;t F U ~~ ~ <ili1 00 Building Setbacks i. Frontage Occupancy (a) Frontage occupancy is the mmlmum amount of building face for all land uses permitted within Westpark that is required to be built along a building setback line. The intent is to create a street wall that will spatially define the streets and public realm. The frontage occupancy requirement increases as the setting becomes more urban and the intended spatial definition increases. (i) Frontage occupancy is shown by block in Figure B-3 Frontage Occupancy Map. (ii) Frontage occupancy requirements apply to all floors of buildings (excluding occupied or unoccupied space in roofs). If an individual building is recessed from the Building Setback Line, or omitted to preserve a significant existing tree, that frontage should be credited as occupied frontage. ii. Residential: (a) Minimum and maximum setbacks are established in Table A 1. iii. Commercial/Retail: (a) Minimum and maximum setbacks are established in Table A 1. iv. Encroachments at Building Setback Lines: (a) Structures and parking areas may encroach into required setbacks if it can be shown that such encroachment allows significant trees or a cluster of trees to be retained. Encroachment shall be the minimum encroachment necessary to protect specified trees. In no case shall the yard be reduced to less than five (5) feet. (b) Stoops, porches, bay windows, trim, eaves, arcades, balconies, major and minor focal elements, cupolas, fire places, and awnings shall be permitted to encroach beyond the Building Setbacks. Residential Yards i. Front Yards (a) Front yards shall be as indicated on the Frontage Occupancy & Building Setback Plan ii. Side Yards (a) The minimum side yard shall be three feet (3') for all primary buildings - Attached buildings shall be exempt from this requirement on the side where attached. (b) Zero-Lot-Lines. Single Family Detached Homes may have zero (0) foot side yard if its other side yard is at six feet (6') and adjacent houses are sited such that a minimum of six feet (6') of separation exists between structures. (c) For single family detached homes and town homes, detached garages shall have a three-foot (3') minimum side yard, except in the case where detached garages of adjacent units are attached to each other. Detached garages of adjacent units that are attached to each other shall have no minimum side yard. (d) Zero-Lot-Lines. Detached Garages may have zero (0) foot side yard if its other side yard is at 6' and adjacent detached garages are sited such that a minimum of six feet (6') of separation exists between structures. (e) Corner buildings (buildings fronting on two streets) shall have two front yards along the streets and only one side yard. iii. Rear Yards (a) Minimum rear yard for residential units with detached garages is four (4) feet. (b) Minimum rear yard for Single Family, Duplex, Townhouse, Stacked Townhouse, and Manor House types with integral garages is eighteen (18) feet where tandem parking spaces are provided. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Utility Equipment i. Utilities should be installed underground to the greatest extent feasible. Utilities installed above ground shall be screened from view. ii. Trash storage areas shall be screened from view, animal proof, and easily accessible to service personnel. All trash enclosures shall be screened with walls, wood fencing, or evergreen plant material or combinations thereof. iii. Window air conditioning units are not permitted on front facades or facades visible from any public right-of-way with the =~lI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :ii= TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . exception of alleys. iv. Roof and ground mounted equipment, including HVAC units, shall be screened from VIew. Satellite dishes and antennas shall be the smallest possible to receive the signal, shall be placed in the least conspicuous location, and shall be screened and match the adjacent building colors as closely as possible. Walls, Hedges and Fences 1. Fence height may not exceed six (6) feet. ii. Front yard fences may not exceed three (3) feet in height and shall be an 'open' style. These must be set back at least one (1) foot from the back edge of the sidewalk. iii. The maximum combined height for walls and fences is three and a half (3.5) feet. iv. Walls or fences on slopes over 15% and visible from the public areas, shall step with the slope in sections. v. Side yard fences attached to the face of the house should be set back five (5) feet from the front face of the house. iv. Side yard setbacks near public areas shall be at least 50% open. Exterior Lighting 1. Subtle, low-level lighting of facades and front yard landscape areas is encouraged. Light pollution should be minimized by selection of proper fixtures. ii. Lighting should not spill over beyond property lines or cast glare to surrounding properties. iii. Pole mounted lighting is not permitted inside the property lines of single family detached or attached homes. Pole mounted pedestrian lighting should be used in the right-of-way. iv. Lighting in garage and utility areas should not impact neighboring properties or common areas. Motion sensitive wall mounted exterior lights are required on all garage faces along alleys. v. All street lighting, parking lot lighting, and porch lights shall be incandescent, halogen, natural gas elements, or metal halide. High pressure sodium lighting is prohibited. Light levels shall meet City of Bremerton standards. VI. Exterior light fixtures should match the architectural style of the building. vii. Lighting for commercial uses shall be appropriately shielded so as to not impact adjacent residential areas or residential units in mixed-use buildings. viii. All street lights should be comprised of ornamental poles and fixtures; Cobra heads and shoe box style lighting is prohibited. Preferred lights are 12'-14' tall. 20' tall poles may be utilized at major intersections. lX. Street lighting should be placed in the "furnishing zone" in Village Commercial areas (See Glossary). x. Parking lot lighting shall conform to the standards in the Village Commercial zone. Street Standards 1. Street Standards shall be in accordance with the standards of BMC Title 11 with the following additions and/or revisions: (a) Westpark's circulation system - streets, sidewalks and pedestrian paths - IS an important element in site design and providing connectivity on and off-site. The locations of streets by type are shown in Figure B-4 Thoroughfare Map. Streets, driveways and sidewalks shall be constructed using the standards described below and shown in Figures B-5 and B-6. 11. Street Sections (a) Neighborhood Streets (Streets D, E, G, I, 0): (i) Description: One or two-lane streets with on-street parking, sidewalks and trees on both sides. Connects neighborhoods within Westpark. (b) Standards: (i) Total right-of-way: 52 feet (ii) Travel Lane (1): 16 feet April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ (Q ~ ~ Q Z =< ~I ~ [f= Z Wl ~ rfb o I~ Wl :> Wl Q r---J] ~ Wl Z, Wl G 00 > =, Z o c=::::J [f= U IWl ~ ffl ~ (kJ ~ ~ (kJ z ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ (Sb o d IW > ~ (kJ d ~ ~ Z ~ tdJ > ~ Z o ~ ~ U i!:Edl ~ ~ 00 (iii) On-Street parking (both sides): 7 feet (iv) Sidewalks (both sides): Shall have a minimum with of 5 feet (v) Planting Strips: a. Shall have a maximum width of 6 feet. b. Street trees shall be placed every 40' and shall be 2.5" caliper minimum at time of planting. Recommended species are identified in the appendix. (vi) Lighting: a. Ornamental street lights shall be used, with a 12' maximum pole height and shall be consistent throughout the site. (c). Baer Boulevard Description: A tree-lined street with 2 traffic lanes, on street parking, sidewalks and trees on both sides. Provides access to the regional transportation system. iii. Standards: (a) Total right-of-way: 58 feet (b) Travel Lanes (2): 11 feet (c) On-Street parking (both sides): 7 feet each side (d) Sidewalks: Shall have a minimum width of 5 feet (e) Planting Strips: i. Shall have a maximum width of 6 feet. ii. Street trees shall be placed every 40' and shall be 2.5" caliper minimum at time of planting. Recommended species are identified in the appendix. iv. Green/Pedestrian Streets Description: Tree-lined pedestrian paths which connect Westpark neighborhoods, parks and serVICes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i. Total width at entry (garage face to garage face): 28 feet. ii. Travel lane: 11 feet iii. Planting strip/utilities: Shall have a maximum width of 7 feet iv. Alley entrances should be located along streets that do not front on a public green space. v. The entrance should be a minimum of 55' from an intersection measured from the Right-of-Way. (b) Driveway Entrances i. Standards: (a) Driveway entrances should be located along streets that do not front on a public green space,. (b) The entrance should be a minimum of 55' from an intersection measured from the Right -of- Way. (c) All driveway aprons shall be paved and are to be concrete. Streetscapes (a) Standards: i. Total right-of-way: 40 feet ii. Sidewalks: Shall have a maximum width of 5 feet iii. Planting strips: Shall have a maximum width of 5 feet (both sides) v. Alleys Description: Alleys provide access to garages and for deliveries and services for specified types of units. (a) Standards: i. Commercial streetscapes should have a different character than residential streets. They should be designed to accommodate the higher level of use and the additional activities that typically take place on them. ii. Sidewalks must be paved from building face to street curb. iii. Street trees are required on all streets at 40' spacing and shall be 2.5" caliper minimum at time of planting. iv. Street trees shall be planted in tree pits with tree grates. v. A "furnishing zone" must be established (see definitions and street sections). vi. Pavement shall be scored with a pattern or composed of pavers. vii. Cross-walks should be a scored concrete pattern or pavers. viii. Outdoor dining and seating are permitted and encouraged along commercial sidewalks. ix. Curbs shall be vertical (not rolled). x. Streetscapes that are primarily paved should have moveable planters, containing plants with seasonal color. =''1= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;iii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi. All new walks and crosswalks along commercial streets should use some form of special paving. Special paving is defined as scored concrete, stone pavers, brick pavers, or concrete unit pavers. xii. Parking garage access points should be composed of pavers. xiii. Paver selection and paving patterns should be consistent with the overall architectural style. Low Impact Development Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound as applied to the 1992 Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. Flow Credits may also be calculated per the final Kitsap Homebuilders Foundation Low Impact Development Standards, expected for completion in 2007. i. Inclusion of LID: Buildout of the Westpark sub-area plan shall incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) to the greatest feasible extent, while also recognizing that site, topography, soils and other conditions may limit the inclusion of LID techniques for stormwater. The development shall apply good faith efforts, explore and seek to include LID measures. In it's review of preliminary plat engineering and design the City may impose conditions to reasonably accommodate LID while also recognizing site-specfic limitations. Inclusion of all LID shall fit within the land use framework established in this Sub-Area Plan. ii. Design: Design of LID techniques such as rain gardens, pervious pavements etc. shall be in accord with the design criteria of the Washington State Department of Ecology's Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound. Design Criteria per the final Kitsap Homebuilders Foundation Low Impact Development Standards, expected for completion in 2007, may also be used. iii. Flow Credits: LID techniques are intended to reduce the amount of stormwater runoff required to be handled with treatment and conventional flow control facilities. The City of Bremerton shall grant Flow Credits for all LID techniques included in Westpark. Flow Credits are reductions to the volume of stormwater runoff the City requires to be handled with conventionally engineered facilities. Flow Credits shall be determined per the modeling methods described in Chapter 7 of the Washington State Department of Ecology's April 19, 2007 WESTPARK (0'] Q ~ < Q Z ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~~ ~ rfhl o d WI > WI Q d ~ ~ WI Z ~ o 00 > c=::::J Z o c:::=j ~ U WI ~ @ FIGURE 8-4 THOROGHFARE MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . THOROUGHFARE PLANS ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ rd ~ ~ ~ ~ c:=:::3 LEGEND ~ "" I_I Street A- Baer Blvd. ~ ~ D Street B, N ~ ~ D ~ Street C, S ~ III] Street D, E, G, I, 0, R ~ 00 > Street F, K, Q c:=:::3 D Street H, J, L, M :z 0 D Street P I:=:=:j ~ D Green Street I & 2 U ~ III Existing Building ~ :J [ C r -, , , , , , , , , : : Street S , , , , Street J .....' I 1- r:- I I , r,l r :r: r t> [ b r '" r f ..... -------- NEIGHBOR- HOOD PARK , , , , , , , L_J 1 lJc- ~- Street E 1i(;' , ~),\~- - -- '~),',~ '\}l~ :rJI~ :rJ:;::; r -1)'-, Street D _1IIlI_____ Street C tffi) IP!l1 BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT =;;; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE I)ERGER PARTNERSH1P-PARAMETRIX FIGURE 8-5 STREET SECTIONS --S~=;E-t;:~;~~~=~~~Go~~ ;~~___Inl, i, ,I II 'i ! i -f ~i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - ~" .:i..,J't;"'~Q. "" .""N> r '(,~,.:; , ~~,,~,,'~' ,~." ~ ~ 'J. "J. (; <::: ::' , '( / \! ' I i, ,',. - - ! 1"'T, ; ff,'~.-,~:,1,'j t;l' "j./ I r ',i 0 - . 1~i2~,'." ~t <,'. '~/f ':.: '~ I '~.l . Curb Return Radius: 25 feet at street intersections. . Heights of buildings along Baer Boulevard to I; vary. . Curbs shall be vertical (not mountable). . 2-way, park two sides. . Fire access queuing at intervals necessary to accommodate fire apparatus. . Planting strips shown may be converted to drainage swales to encourage L.I.D. through review with City staff at the time of preliminary plat applications. 4W STR.E ET B, N o / I, ~.~.: .(J-' r1 'l".,,;,/ ~ ~' '''" --"\v-, '('..........,. ' ,-/.-.. '...r-'~.- ~ ~.J I .;,:~-"...:., . Curb Return Radius: 25 feet at street intersections. , . Curb shall be vertical (not mountable) on building side of street. . No curb on park side. 18" flat concrete edge or slotted roll curb. . 2-way, park one side. I: . Fire access queuing at intervals necessary to accommodate fire apparatus. . Planting strips shown may be converted to I drainage swales to encourage L.I.D. through review with City staff at the time of preliminary plat applications. April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ >=: ~ ~ > t=I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d < ~ ~ ~ t=I ~ "" ~ F ~ ~ ~ F ~ 00 !; > t=I Z o t=I F U ~ ~ , " ~ ~ ~ ~ > c=:::::I ~ ~ ~ ~ cd ~ ~ Ib!8 ~ 1:::=::::1 ~ C> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ pi ~ 00 > c=:::::I :z g c::::=:J ~ U ~ ~ l!-~ i l! STREET C, S -::i " " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I " l! /: Ii I' il 11 " ii I, Ii II Ii " II I, II Ii Ii I' II 'I II Ii II II 'I II Ii , .- --~-------------.-- I o Oil STREET D, E, G, l, 0, R , I 1: . Curb Return Radius: 25 feet at street intersections. . Queuing (2-way), park two sides. , . Fire access queuing at intervals necessary to accommodate fire apparatus. . Planting strips shown may be converted to drainage swales to encourage L.l.D. through review with City staff at the time of preliminary plat applications. .' Ii I, 11 ii , l! , II i: I: t; I, I, ii Ii II II II I' ,I II Ii I I i i d " [i !I Ii _ _ 11Im I!!!l!!l'I !!ED _ _ .. " II " Ii II il 11 :i " 1\ I! ,: Ii . Curb Return Radius: 25 feet at street intersections except the intersection at street B. . Curbs shall be vertical (not mountable). . 2-way, park two sides. . Planting strips shown may be converted to drainage swales to encourage L.l.D. through " review with City staff at the time of preliminary i plat applications. ~ =PS:= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT Iii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 f cj" J~ ./~,. .i .1 i ^:r I. . _ r i__,,7 ,-,.J 1 '/ ~L._, < . Curb Return Radius: 25 feet at street intersections. . Queing (2-way), park two sides. . Planting strips shown may be converted to I drainage swales to encourage L.l.D. through : review with City staff at the time of preliminary: plat applications. ' i! I I I 1- tW] ~ ~ ~ > c::::=:I ~ Q ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ Q c::::=:I tW] "" tW] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tW] 00 " > c::::=:I Z o c::::=:I ~ U ~ tW] STREET H, ), L. M j, ,- i' I- i . Curb Return Radius: 25 feet at street intersections. . 2-way, park two sides. . Planting strips shown may be converted to drainage swales to encourage L.l.D. through I. review with City staff at the time of preliminary plat applications. i i: . _u I --, April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~n ~ ~ ~ JhiidI > C=:::;I ~ (bJ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ (bJ i::::::=j ~ "" ~ F JhiidI ~ F ~ 00 > i::::::=j Z () c=:=:j F U ~ ~ ir--- STREET P GREEN STREET 1 & 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " ii t o Curb Return Radius: 35 feet at street intersections. o One-way, park one side. o No curb on park side. 18" flat concrete edge or slotted roll curb. o One-way loop only. o Planting strips shown may be converted to drainage swales to encourage L.I.D. through review with City staff at the time of preliminary plat applications. II if Ii " II II II !I 'i D D D D D D D D D 11 !I II I, I, i' " i I, I I, " I' I I' I !I o Minimum 20' from building face to building face. o Pedestrian only. o Planting strips shown may be converted to I drainage swales to encourage L.I.D. through , review with City staff at the time of preliminary I, plat applications. 'I ~ =~fI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :i;1 TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~==---=_: :::-:::~-==_===:_:::::::.::.=::.-_:::..:::__:::::_=:=_c_:::::: - ---:--=:-ii II TYPICAL ALLEY II 11----------------------- il ,I II Ii Ii II- i_! ! II I I, I, 'i , I, I I' il I! Ii Ii I: . Curb Return Radius: IS feet or as approved by The City of' Bremerton. . Planting islands shall be provided between every unit. . Tree Placement: ': Every island. . Shall be used with integral garage units and detached garages. · All alleys shall be public right of way. . All alleys are 2-way. General Notes . Street Tree Placement: 40 foot spacing. . Street Tree Location: Centered in the planting strip. . Street Light Placement: Coordinated with The City of Bremerton. . Final design coordinated with The City of Bremerton. . Maintain fire access way on Little Berma Road, with bollards for access control. . Where L.l.D. storm water detention techniques are used outside of the R.O.W., they shall be maintained by the BHA or a private homeowners association. . Any planter strip may be converted to accommodate LID techniques. Minor deviations from sidewalks and on-street parking as shown in this section are allowable provided cartway width is maintained, and the deviation is the minimum necessary, subject to final approval by the City Engineer. . Where LID is located in the ROW it shall be maintained by the City of Bremerton. April 19, 2007 0JJ ~ ~ ~ > '=i ~ ~ ~ 0JJ ~ d :< ~ ~ ~ ~I 0JJ '" 0JJ P ~ fb!!dl ~ P 0JJ 00 > '=i z o '=i P U [!-.lUl ~ WESTPARK ~ y Z ~J ~ ~ ~ f9--1 00 > = z o = [f= U ~ ~ General Standards Parking shall be provided in accordance with BMC 20.48 with the following exceptions and modifications: 1. Off-street parking spaces and driveways shall be used for the temporary storage of motor vehicles used by persons visiting or having business to conduct on the premises for which the parking is provided. ii. Parking space required and intended for use by occupants or users of specific premises shall not be leased or rented to others, nor shall such space be made unavailable through other means to the users for whom the parking spaces are intended. This, however, does not preclude shared parking arrangements or other activities approved by the city 111. Except where specifically permitted in certain zoning designations, off-street parking spaces shall not be used for loading or unloading of commercial vehicles larger than those vehicles for which the parking spaces are intended. iv. Structured parking shall not be allowed with the exception of the high density apartment and condominium parcels. v. Off-street parking space dimensions shall be as follows: (a) Compact spaces shall be a minimum of 7.5 feet wide; (b) Standard spaces shall be a minimum of 8.0 feet wide; (c) Standard spaces shall be a maximum of 8.5 feet wide; (d) Standard and compact spaces shall be a minimum of 14.5 feet and a maximum of 18.0 feet in length; (e) Exceptions to the above maximum dimensions shall be granted for handicapped spaces. vi. Parking and loading areas shall be graded for proper drainage and provided with a suitable surface, as approved by the city engineer. vii. All driveways and areas used for loading, parking and maneuvering motorized vehicles shall be paved. Gravel surfaces are not allowed. viii. Each parking or loading space must be usable and readily accessible. ix. Required parking and loading areas shall be provided with designated entrances and exits located so as to minimize traffic congestion and avoid undue interference with public use of streets, alleys and walkways. x. Parking and loading areas provided in accordance with the requirements of these standards and shall not be used for the sale, repair, assembly or disassembly, storage or servicing of vehicles or equipment. Unlicensed and inoperable vehicles shall not be stored in any required parking or loading space. xi. If existing parking lots are re-striped, then the new layout of the parking spaces shall be the same as the previous layout or, if changed, then the changed layout shall conform to the existing dimensional requirements of this chapter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compact Car Allowance i. A maximum of30 percent of the total required off-street parking stalls may be permitted and designated for compact cars in commercial and retail areas. ii. Each compact stall shall be designated as such. iii. Dimensions of compact parking stalls shall conform to the standards as depicted in this chapter. iv. The maximum compact car allowance may be exceeded if an applicant submits a vehicle composition study, relevant to the type of development, which demonstrates that a greater number of compact vehicles should be accommodated. Bicycle Parking Requirements i. Applicability. Bicycle parking requirements shall apply to all commercial, office, mixed-use and multi-family residential developments. ii. General Requirements for Bicycle Facilities. (a) In any development required to provide 10 or more parking spaces, bicycle parking shall be provided. (b) For each bicycle parking space required, a stationary rack shall be provided which can accommodate bicyclists' locks securing the frame and wheels, or a lockable enclosure in which the bicycle is stored. [f4l =~f1= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;ii; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PARKING STANDARDS J D o NEIGHBORHOOD PARK LEGEND _ Tuck Under, Individual Garages, or Parking Pads _ Surface Parking , '~ ' , , , , , , , , , ,- - -' I . y Z r=::::J ~ ~ < ~I o 0 ,-, r= > t= D Structured Parking Street E rzI~ Surface/Structured Parking _ Existing Building April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ z o =1 F U fk!!d) W2l y :z = ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 > = Z o I=:i ~I U ~ 0'dl ~ c. PARKING STANDARDS Parking Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intent: Assure that sufficient space is provided for the parking, loading and unloading of motor vehicles. Provide minimum and maximum standards of space and parking arrangements, and for the movement of motor vehicles into and out of such spaces. Enhance safety for pedestrians and motor vehicle operators. Encourage the creation of an aesthetically pleasing and functionally adequate system of off street parking and loading facilities. i. Parking for the land uses permitted and anticipated in Westpark shall be consistent with the standards in Table C-I below. Any uses not listed below shall be consistent with the off-street parking requirements of BMC 20.48. Table C-1 Parking Requirements Automobile Spaces Bicycle Spaces Land Use Category Minimum Maximum Residential: Single Family/Duplex 1 :du 2:du Single Family ADU 1 :du 1:du Multi-Family 1:du 2:du Apartment/Condominium 1 :du 2:du 1: 1 0 du Business/Commercial: Retail 10,000 SF or less 3:1,000 Qsf 4:1,000 Qsf 1: 5,000 Qsf Retail larger than 10,000 4:1,000 gsf 5:1,000 gsf 1 :2,500 gsf SF Offices 3:1,000 gsf 3:1,000 gsf 1 :2,500 gsf RestaurantIT avern/F ast 3:1,000 sf 3:1,000 sf 1 :500 sf of Food/Drive-in of seati ng of seati ng seating area area area Personal Service 3:1,000 gsf 4: 1,000 Qsf 1:1,500 gsf Medical/Dental 4:1,000 gsf 6:1,000 Qsf 1 :2,500 gsf Library 2.5:1,000 3: 1,000 gsf 1:1,000 gsf gsf =~fI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :ii= TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii. Bicycle parking shall have direct access to both the public right-of-way and to the main entrance of the principal use. lll. For facilities with multiple buildings, building entrances or parking lots, bicycle parking shall be located in areas of greatest use and convenience to bicyclists. iv. Bicycle parking facilities shall be sep- arated from motor vehicle parking and maneuvering areas by a barrier or sufficient distance to prevent damage to the parked bicycles. v. If any motor vehicle parking is covered, required bicycle parking must also be covered. vi. Each required bicycle parking space should be at least two feet wide and six feet long and, when covered, provide a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide should be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking. Vertical clearance may be four feet in an enclosed bicycle locker. vii. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle. Vlll. All bicycle racks, lockers, or other facilities shall be securely anchored to the ground or to a structure and must hold bicycles securely by means of the frame. The frame must be supported so that the bicycle cannot be pushed or fall to one side in a manner that will damage the wheels. ix. Lighting shall be provided in a bicycle parking area so that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks or motor vehicle parking lots during all hours of use. Bicycle parking shall be at least as well-lit as motor vehicle parking. x.Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly marked and reserved for bicycle parking only. xi. Where bicycle parking facilities are not directly visible and obvious from the public right(s)-of-way, entry and directional signs shall be provided to direct bicyclists from the public right-of-way to the bicycle parking facility. Directions to employee parking facilities may be signed or supplied by the employer as appropriate. xii. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced in the same manner as the automobile parking area or with a suitable surface (i.e., asphalt, concrete, pavers, or similar material) maintained in a smooth, durable, and well-drained condition. xiii. Bicycle parking may be provided within the public right-of-way in zoning districts where no front setback is required, subject to approval of the planning official. Bicycle Parking: i. The required minimum number of bicycle parking spaces for each use category is shown on Table C-l. Bicycle parking spaces are meant to accommodate residents, employees, visitors, customers, messengers, and other persons. ii. Bicycle parking shall be located on site within 50 feet of well- used entrances and not farther from the entrance than the closest motor vehicle parking space. Bicycle parking may be located within city right-of-way in areas without building setbacks, subject to approval of the director and provided it meets the other bicycle parking requirements. iii. Bicycle parking for multiple uses, such as a commercial center, may be clustered in one or several locations but must meet all other requirements for bicycle parking. iv. For buildings with multiple entrances, required bicycle parking shall be distributed proportionally at the various public entrances. v. Employee and residential parking should offer a high level of security, i.e., bicycle lockers or a locked cage or room with locking facilities inside. If stationary bike racks are used, the parking facility must be monitored to ensure security. vi. For buildings with multiple entrances, required bicycle parking shall be distributed April 19, 2007 o z ~ ~ ~ ~ rfb 00 > C=::::::I z o ~ F U IULJj ~ WESTPARK ~ fG) Z i=3 ~ ~ ~ rfb 00 > i=3 Z o i=3 [[==1 U ~ ~ near the vanous public entrances, while employee parking shall be located at the employee entrance, if applicable. Other Required Parking Spaces 1. Motorcycle Parking Requirements. Motorcycle spaces shall be required in non- residential areas only at a rate of one (1) per 100 automobile spaces with a minimum of one (1) motorcycle space provided. Drive- Through Stacking Requirements i. A stacking space shall be an area measuring eight feet by 20 feet with direct forward access to a service window of a drive-through facility. A stacking space shall be located to prevent any vehicles from extending onto the public right-of-way, or interfering with any pedestrian circulation, traffic maneuvering, or other required parking areas. Stacking space for drive-through or drive-in uses may not be counted as required off-street parking spaces. ii. For each drive-up lane of a financial institution, business service, vendor stand, or other drive-through use not listed, a minimum of three stacking spaces shall be provided. iii. For each service lane of a drive-through restaurant, a minimum of seven stacking spaces shall be provided. iv. Stacking spaces serving businesses that are located adjacent to a less intensive zone than that in which the business is located, or are located adjacent to a public use area such as a street, sidewalk, park, or trail, shall be landscaped to provide a buffer between the stacking spaces and the adjacent zone or public use. Structured Parking i. Structured parking shall be located behind the block perimeter buildings. ii. Structured parking shall not be visible from the street, except at the actual vehicular entry points iii. Vehicular and service entries to garages shall be designed to look like a part of the building. iv. No portion of the public garage shall be visible from any street within Westpark, except at the actual vehicular entry point. v. Parking garages vi. Parking garages with flat roofs may not exceed the height of the shortest building on the block when a flat roof is present on any building on the block, and parking garages with pitched roofs may not exceed the height of the shortest building on the block by more than one story. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On-Street Parking i. On-Street parking shall count as visitor parking. ~ =~tt= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :ii;: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHI P-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Intent: In addition to the significant parks and open space included in the Sub-Area Plan, the Westpark site will include significant landscaping with retained and new trees and vegetation. Landscaping will be focused along streets to enhance the pedestrian environment, along the site's boundaries with arterials to provide screening, and adjacent to the commercial area to provide land use transitions. In some areas, such as the retail village and the neighborhood square, hardscape and green features will be mixed. The overall objective oflandscaping is to preserve, protect and enhance undisturbed areas within Westpark. Major stands of significant trees will be preserved in the site's park and open space system. Individual land uses will be sited to balance the preservation of significant trees and vegetation with the need to accommodate intensive urban redevelopment. Landscape design will also encourage and promote water conservation. General Development Standards Landscaping shall be provided in accordance with BMC 20.50 with the following additions and/revisions: i. Landscaping shall be constructed using the standards described below and as shown in Figures D-l Landscape Plan and Figure D-2 Planting Plan. Parks and Open Space General Requirements The following types and amounts of parks and open space will be provided in Westpark: i. Active Open Space: (a) Approximately 12 acres of land should be allocated for active open space and could include: (i) 1 large park, (ii) A dog park and (iii) Open corridors connecting the entire community (iv) Play structures (v) Open fields. Park areas will provide for both group and small athletic activities. ii. Passive Open Space: (a) Approximately 4.5 acres of land should be allocated for passive open space, with a natural/preservation area as the central element. A proposed park is leveraged on these features and will create a sense of arrival from two edges of the development as well as a view corridor of the greater Bremerton area. iii. Tree Preservation Open Space: (a) Approximately 11.5 acres of land should be allocated for tree preservation, which will protect a large expanse of second growth trees and a steep slope. This large forested area will provide an anchor to the natural environment, a regionally sensitive context for the neighborhood, and a signature identity for the community. iv. Public Ways: (a)A network of approximately 57,000 linear feet of sidewalks and paths should be allocated which will create a pleasant and convenient pedestrian environment. Location and Design of Parks & Open Space i. The general locations of open space are shown on Figure B-1 Land Use Map. The design concept and development standards for on-site parks are described below ii. The Summit Park will be a large, multi- faceted green space located in the center of the site and should to contain the following: (a) A plaza, bicycle trails and walking paths. (b) Recreation and community space including a lawn area and perennial beds. (c) A view corridor allowing views out over Oyster Bay and Dyes Inlet. (d) Defined by the large existing stand of trees and homes at its perimeter. (e) The center of the park will be main- tained as a mown grass recreation area with picnicking facilities. (f) The Plaza area in the southern portion April 19, 2007 o z c:=:::I ffh, < U ~ g Z < d 00 > I_I :z o ,= ~I U W ~ WESTPARK ~ o z: 1====:1 ~ ~ u (0')) (Q z: :S > [:=::::3 z: o ~ F U ~ (0')) (ill) 00 will include enhanced paving, landscaping and a combination of fIxed benches and movable furniture. iii. The Neighborhood Square located in the southwest area of the site off Baer Boulevard will provide a green space in the heart of the neighborhood. This space should offer the following amenities: (a) A more "formal" layout that references traditional neighborhoods. (b) Primarily open lawn to accommodate a variety of functions; (c) Occasional shade trees and/or orna- mental trees may be planted along the edges of the open lawn. (d) A perimeter will be defIned by street trees. Tree and Vegetation Preservation Requirements i. Provide or review a tree survey prior to building permit application to identify and designate all trees and vegetated areas located within lots and yards that can be retained. Designated trees shall be subject to preservation requirements at the time of building permit. ii. Provide adequate protection for retained vegetation. iii. Identify how retained trees will be pro- tected both during and after construction. iv. Buildings, retaining walls, utilities and paved surfaces must be far enough away from retained trees to allow room for construction activities and to assure a proper growth environment after construction. v. Construction activities shall not take place within the drip line of the tree unless extra precautions are recommended by a certifIed arborist. A tree's drip line is the most extreme reach of its branches beyond its trunk diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, whichever is greater. vi. Provide a tree well or other form of pro- tection where the surrounding grade must be raised. vii. SignifIcant vegetation to be retained must be protected during construction by installation of a protective barricade. This will required preliminary identifIcation of the proposed area of disturbance for staff inspection and approved, then installation of a protective barricade before major excavation with heavy equipment begins. viii. The barricade must be made of four- inch by four-inch post with chain-link fence attached. Fence height must be a minimum of four feet high. ix. Any tree proposed or required to be retained and which is subsequently lost or destroyed must be replaced with at least three six-foot trees or one 18-foot tree or one 12-foot tree plus one six-foot tree of the same species. x. Topping or trimming trees in a manner that alters the natural symmetry of a tree is not allowed unless necessary for safety reasons as certifIed by an ISA certifIed arborist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Parking Lot Design & Landscaping Parking lots shall meet the Parking Lot Design and Landscaping requirements of BMC 20.48 and 20.50, with the following changes: i. Surface parking lots shall be located behind buildings wherever feasible. ii. Screening with evergreen plantings shall be provided for parking lots in the following locations: (a) Any parking lots visible from Kitsap Way, SR 3, or from internal streets; (b) Parking lots abutting residential/mixed- use uses or zones; (c) Landscape requirements are one plant unit per twenty spaces with a minimum of one island for every ten spaces; (d) Where a tree planting island occurs, the entire length of a bay, there shall be a minimum of one tree planting island every fIfteen spaces and a large shade tree every fIfteen spaces in a tree planting island; (e) Where a tree planting island occurs, the entire length of a bay, the entire length shall be planted with large shade trees every forty fIve feet. =,.,= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT Iii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional landscaping requirements include the following 1. Maximize privacy between residences while encouraging community interaction; ii. Minimize visibility of utilities and other site necessities; iii. Reduce and mitigate disruptions of natural drainage patterns and contain runoff from impervious surfaces; iv. Provide habitat with a diversity of trees, shrubs and ground cover; v. Protect and enhance and maintain the dense natural forested area; vi. Landscaping should define outdoor living spaces, enhance the architecture, and maintain off-site views; vii. Trees and shrubs, at maturity, should not interfere with view corridors, utilities, or solar access for adjacent properties; viii. Trees shall be appropriately sized and located so as to avoid blocking views from adjacent and/or uphill residential homes and public areas; ix. Tree species should not require ongoing homeowner maintenance to maintain view covenant limitations; x. Planting on slopes in open space and commercial areas; (a) 4:1 to 2:1 mass plantings of trees and shrubs are suggested. (b) Slopes over 2: 1 require erosion control measure such as jute matting with ornamental grasses or groundcovers. xi. Neighborhood parks, squares or plazas should be designed to reinforce the civic nature of these spaces and provide the appropriately scaled amenities. The design of these spaces should vary one from another with the largest tending toward more "natural" in appearance and the smallest receiving a more urbane treatment. Plant Selection i. Planting Materials. A general planting list is included at the end of this section. (a) Other plant materials may be considered that have these characteristics and similar maintenance requirements; (b) Additional species and varieties may be selected if authorized by the Westpark Design Review Committee; (c) Plants suitable for planting on slopes are identified in appendix. (d) Trees and shrubs should provide a varied canopy for functionality. The lists reflect the intent to emphasize evergreen species within the landscaping plan. (e) Scattered plantings of deciduous species can be featured fortheir seasonal color, interest, biodiversity, and habitat contribution. (f) Plants should provide year round interest - e.g., fall color, flower, foliage, branching structure, and branch color. (g) When used in combination with walls or rockeries, plant materials should all be a minimum of 80% native and/or drought tolerant evergreen varieties. (h) Avoid trees that tend to be shallow-rooting and susceptible to wind and snow load. (i) Maximize the frequency and sizing for new trees based on species characteristics and health parameters for new trees. No new tree shall have a DBH of less than 2.5". Responsibility for tree maintenance and health shall extend through full landscape bonding. ii. Recommendations for Slope Plants: (a) Slope plants should be selected for their ability to develop deep roots and thereby knit the soil into a cohesive mass. (b) Plants should consist of native and adaptive species that can withstand drought in summer as well as continually wet soil in winter. (c) Younger plants in the correct growing medium establish more readily and have a better "top to root" balance than larger specimens; therefore the roots of younger plants become established before the foliage outgrows its root support. (d) Plants smaller than 1 gallon in size are difficult to establish without an automatic sprinkler system and continual hand- weeding. Appropriately sized plants should be selected to establish quickly with the least April 19, 2007 y Z c:::=::J rfb ~ U (0'] ~ Z ~ d 00 > c:::=::J z o c:::=::J ~ U ~ (0'] WESTPARK @1\ 0 z t;:::::::;j @b < U (0J) ~ Z LEGEND ~ I~ III Screening I Buffer 00 > D Existing Landscape to be l:::=:=j Retained & Supplement Z I_I Stormwater g Management Plan t;:::::::;j F1 - Sloped Planting U Areas IW D Retail Street Tree (0}) Planting & Hardscape I_I Swale - Existing Building LANDSCAPE PLAN FIGURE 0-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN J D o ree NEICHBORHOO PARK , , , , , , , , , , , , L_.J t= Street Street LJ ~ =~p.= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;i: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX c= . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . maintenance. (e) Ornamental or native plants that require extensive irrigation should not be planted within 10 feet of the top of slope. Ill. The use of native vegetation at West Park is strongly encouraged in locations where appropriate, and where the survivability of the native vegetation is most likely. These areas include understory areas in native woodlands or created woodlands, gardens with Eastern and Northern exposures and, depending on the individual plant, in irrigated Southern and Western exposures. (a) Native plants prefer soil rich in organic matter so some soil amendment might be required to meet the needs of these plants. (b) Using native plants, especially evergreen trees, care must be taken in locating them in garden areas. Some plants may outgrow their site if not placed with anticipation of their mature size. (c) Native plants, properly located, can be drought tolerant once established. For at least the first two years of growth supplemental watering will be required. Irrigation i. All irrigation systems, with the exception of residential systems, shall be designed by a licensed landscape architect. ii. Irrigation on sloped areas shall be tem- porary and shall be removed 24 months after installation or after the establishment of the landscape materials, whichever comes first. Suggested Plant List DECIDUOUS TREES Small: Acer circinatum - Vine Maple* Acer japonicum - Full Moon Maple Acer griseum - Paperbark Maple Acer palmatum - Japanese Maple Amerlanchier alnifolia - Serviceberry * Amelanchier var. - Serviceberry varieties Cornus - 'Eddie's White Wonder Dogwood' Cornus kousa - Kousa Dogwood Cornus mas - Cornelian Cherry Cornus nuttallii - Pacific Dogwood * Corylus corn uta - Western Hazelnut * Magnolia kobus - Kobus Magnolia Malus fusca - Western Crabapple * Malus sp. - Crabapple (some) Oxydendrum arboreum - Sourwood Prunus cerasifera var. - Purple Leaf Plum varieties Prunus virginiana 'Canada Red' - Canada Red Choke Cherry * Stewartia Styrax japonicus - Japanese Snowbell Medium: Acer rufinerve - Redvein Maple Acer truncatum x platanoides "Warren red" -Pacific Sunset Maple Acer truncatum x platanoides" Keithsform" - Norwegian Sunset Maple Malus sp. - Some Crabapples Parrotia persica - Persian Parrotia Pyrus calleryana var. - Flowering Pear Varieties Prunus sp - Flowering Cherry Prunus s. 'Shirotae' - Shirotae Cherry Columnar Narrow: Carpinus betulus pyramidalis - Pyramidal Hornbeam Fagus sylvatica 'Cockleshell' - European Beech Gingko biloba 'Princeton Sentry' - Maidenhair Tree Parrotia persica 'Vanessa' Prunus sargenti columnaris - Columnar Sargent April 19. 2007 ~ Z c:::=J rfb < U l0'2l ~ z: < d 00 > c:::=J z o c:::=J p U ~ l0'2l WESTPARK @ o z c:=:::j @hI < U W2l g Z ~ I~ > e:::=::::1 z () 1;:::::::::1 iF U w W2l ~ . . PLANTING PLAN . '- ----.J FIGURE D-2 PLANTING PLAN . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . _---f . I I 1 NEIGHBORHOOD I PARK . LEGEND CJ . . . , , I . ..._~ BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME . ri . Liquidambar styracitlua 'Moraina Moraine Sweetgum Fraxinus pensylvanica 'Marshalls' MarshaUs Ash Acer Fremanii 'Morton' Morton Maple Akebono Flowering Cherry . ProBUS x yedoensis 'Akebone' Camus 'Eddie's White Wonder' Eddie's White Wonder Dogwood . Cercidiphylluffi Japonicum Katsura Tree Corn us controversa 'June Snow' June Snow Dogwood . Acer fremanii 'llowhall' BowhalJ Maple Ulmus 'Accolade' Accolade Elm . Quercus ilex Holly Oak Acer rubrum 'October Glory' October Glory Maple . Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset' Red Sunset Maple . Ginkgo biloba 'October Gold' October Gold Maidenhair Tree Fragus sylvatica 'Atropupurea' Purple Beech . Carpinus betulus 'Asplenifolia' Asplen-Ieaved Hornbeam Quercus palustrus Pin Oak Oavidia involucrata Dove Tree Zelkova serrata Zelkova . Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree . Existing Landscape to be Retained & Supplemented - . Existing Building . =~p.= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;iii:i: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cherry Pyrus calleryana 'Glen's Form' - Chanticleer Pear CONIFERS Abies grandis - Grand Fir * Abies koreana - Korean Fir Calocedrus decurrens - Incense Cedar Chamaecyparis nootkatensis 'Pacific Arrow' - Alaska Cedar Juniperus scopulorum (var.) -Juniper Picea omorika - Serbian Spruce Pinus monicola - Western White Pine * Pseudotsuga menziesii - Douglas fir * Taxus baccata - Yew Thuja plicata 'Excelsa' - Western Red * Tsuga heteropylla - Western Hemlock * SHRUBS Smaller shrubs and Ground Cover: Arctostaphylos columbiana - Hairy Manzanita * Arctostaphylos uva-ursi - Kinnikinnick varieties * Berberis (var.) - Dwarf Barberry varieties Camassia quamash - Common Camas * Fothergilla sp. Fragaria chiloensis - Sand Strawberry * Gaultheria shallon - Salal * Hex crenata 'Helleri' - Helleri Holly Hex crenata 'Green Island' - Green Island Holly Linnaea borealis - Twin Flower * Lupinus arcticus - Arctic Lupine * Lupinus polyphyllus - Large-Leaved Lupine * Mahonia aquifolium 'Compacta' -Compact Oregon grape * Mahonia nervosa - Long Leaf Mahonia * Oxalis oregano - Redwood Sorrel * Polystichum munitum - Western Sword Fern * Potentilla (var.) - Potentilla varieties Prunus laurocerasus 'Otto Luyken' - Otto Luyken Laurel Rosa nutkana - Nootka Rose * Rosa pisocarpa - Cluster Rose * Spirea douglasii - Hardhack * Spirea (var.) - Spirea 'Mt Vernon' Symphoricarpos albus - Common Snowberry * Trillium ovatum - Western Trillium * Vaccinium ovalifolium - Evergreen Huckleberry * Vaccinium membranaceum - Black Huckleberry * Vaccinium parvifolium - Red Huckleberry * Viburnum davidii - David Viburnum Viburnum (var.) - Viburnum varieties Medium/Large: Abelia x grandiflora - Glossy Abelia Arbutus unedo (compacta) - Strawberry Tree Berberis (var.) - Barberry varieties Ceanothus velutinus - Tobacco Brush * Cornus sericea - Red Osier Dogwood Enkianthus - Euonymus (var.) - Winged Euonymus varieties Holodiscus discolor - Oceanspray * Hydrangea quercifolia - Oakleaf Hydrangea Hydrangea paniculata - Peegee Hydrangea Hex crenata "Convexa" - Convexleaf Holly Lonicera involucrata - Black Twinberry * Mahonia aquifolium - Tall Oregongrape * Myrica californica - Pacific Wax Myrtle * Oemleria cerasiformis - Indian Plum * Osmanthus delavayii - Osmanthus Osmanthus heterophyllus - Hollyleaf Osmanthus Osmarea burkwoodi - Burkwood Osmarea Philadelphus lewisii - Mock Orange * Physocarpus capitus - Pacific Ninebark * Prunus lusitanica - Portugese Laurel Ribes sanguineum - Flowering Red Currant * Rhododendron macrophylum or R. albiflorum - Western Rhododendron * Rhododendron (var.) - Rhododendron Rubus parviflorus - Thimbleberry * Rubus spectabilis - Salmonberry * Symphocarpus alba - Snowberry Taxus baccata - Irish yew Viburnum vars. -Viburnum varieties HEDGES Hedges: Buxus microphylla 'Winter Gem' - Winter Gem Boxwood Buxus sempervirens.- Common Boxwood Buxus suffruticosa - True Dwarf Boxwood Hex crenata 'Helleri' - Helleri Holly Hex crenata 'Green Island' - Green Island Holly Hex crenata 'Convexa' - Convexleaf Holly Laurel April 19, 2007 v z c=::::J ~ < U ~ g Z < ,----1] 00 > t==:1 z o ,-, pi U I!dY ~ WESTPARK @ IPfI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT =iil TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX Ligustrum japonicum - Japanese Privet Mahonia aquifolium - Oregongrape * Osmanthus heterophyllus - Hollyleaf Osmanthus Prunus laurocerasus 'Otto Luyken' Otto Luyken Prunus lusitanica - Portugese Laurel Taxus sp. - Yew species Taxus cuspidata (var.) - Yew varieties Thuja occidentalis vars. - Arborvitae varieties Thuja occidentalis 'Smaragd' - Emerald Green Viburnum vars. - Viburnum varieties GROUND COVER Groundcover: Arctostaphylos uva-ursi - Kinnikinnick varieties Ceanothus - Wild Lilac Cotoneaster vars. - Cotoneaster varieties Evergreen flowering vines Fragaria vars. - Strawberry varieties Ivy (non-climbing varieties) Juniperus (var.) - Juniper varieties Lawn Grass (Puget Sound Turf Grass varieties - sod or seed) Mahonia nervosa - Longleaf Mahonia * Mahonia repens - Creeping Mahonia Ornamental grasses Thymus - Thyme Vinca minor - Periwinkle ACCENT PLANTING Accent Plantings: Annuals Bulbs Ornamental grasses Perennials OTHER Lonicera ciliosa - Western Trumpet Honeysuckle * PROHIBITED PLANTS Halls Honeysuckle Clematis all types Violets all types * Denotes native plant. Refer to "Plant Selection" on page 63 for Native Planting Guidelines. E. SIGN STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intent: It is the intent of this chapter to promote a quality visual environment by establishing reasonable standards forthe size, placement, height and maintenance of outdoor signs, graphics and advertising. It is further intended to encourage quality design and material composition which create an attractive community and business climate. Implementing these standards will assure that sign age is in harmony with building designs and the character of the surrounding areas. Signage standards shall be in accordance with BMC 20.52 with the exceptions and modifications contained in this section. Color and Materials i. Reflective materials, brilliant luminescent or fluorescent colors shall be permitted for sign graphics and one logo shield per sign face only and may not be used on the background, field, or surface to which graphics or logo shields are applied. ii. Materials which give the appearance of changing color or of movement are prohibited. Number & Size i. Freestanding signs shall be limited to the following number and locations: ii. Commercial. One freestanding sign shall be permitted on each street frontage of property on which the business is located. Sites on a corner of two public streets may have one sign on the corner instead of a sign for each frontage, subject to approval by the City of Bremerton. Commercial properties with more than 1,000 feet of continuous street frontage and with more than one entrance may install a freestanding sign at each entrance; provided, that no single sign exceeds the maximum sign area described under the Freestanding Sign subsection of this section. Where there is frontage on more than one street, each frontage is treated independently. iii. Residential. One freestanding neighborhood identification sign is permitted at each entrance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to a residential neighborhood. Landscaping i. Freestanding signs must be landscaped around the base of the sign. ii. Each sign shall have a landscaped area twice the size of the sign area. If a carved or sandblasted wooden sign is used, landscaping may be reduced by 50% for all grade level landscaping, or by 75% if landscaping is contained in a raised planter around the base of the sign. Raised planters must be at least one and a half (1.5) feet high. Planter and organic materials shall be installed within 30 days of sign installation. The landscaping, sign base or planter shall be protected from vehicles by a six inch high curb stop or sidewalk edge at least three feet from the planter base. iii. Landscaping shall be installed in the planting season closest to the date of the sign permit issuance. Signs installed after the planting season shall be landscaped by no later than the following planting season. iv. These requirements may be waived if the sign is located in an area that is part of an approved overall site landscape plan. Window Signs i. Illuminated window signs shall conform to the total wall sign area standards of the BMC 20.52. ii. Non-illuminated window signs are allowed in addition to the standards of the BMC 20.52; provided, that they do not exceed 25% of the nominal window size (i.e., the window size as specified by the manufacturer). Freestanding Signs i. The sign should have design features which reflect design elements of surrounding structures, or the sign be incorporated into a landscaped area with large and mature plantings which provide a backdrop to the sign and which are at least as tall as the sign. ii. The sign should have the characteristics of a monument sign rather than a pole sign (e.g., the base of the sign support where it meets the ground is at least as wide as the sign face). iii. Maximum Sign Area is twenty- four square feet for a single side or forty-eight (48) square feet total on all sides. If a carved or sandblasted wooden sign is used, freestanding signs may be thirty (30) square feet for a single side or sixty (60) square feet total on all sides. iv. The sign must be consistent with the intent and general scope of the city's sign code and the Westpark design manual standards. Wall Mounted Signs 1. Total Sign Area: (a) Allowed Sign age per Wall Plane. Total allowed signage shall not exceed three percent of the wall plane the sign is mounted to, except that signage covering up to eight percent of a wall plane is allowed if the wall plane conforms to all solid/void ratio requirements specified in the Village Commercial standards. (b) Individual Sign Size. No single wall sign shall exceed fifity (50) square feet. (c) Increased Size Option. If a carved or sandblasted wooden sign is used, the sign size may be increased by 20% of its underlying allowable sign area. (d) Size Restriction. Wall signs must meet the 70% space coverage allowances described under the surface coverage requirements in subsection (2) of this section. ii. Architectural Details. (a) Signs may not cover or obscure important architectural details of a building; they should appear to be a secondary and complementary feature of the building facade. (b) Wall signs must be located within architectural signs bands or other blank spaces which visually frame the sign. (c) Blank wall sections above or between windows and doors, for example, may provide an effective location for signage. However, to avoid a "maxed out" appearance, signs shall be no larger than 70% of the width or height of the blank wall space or fascia the sign is mounted to so as to leave reveal on all sides of the sign and to maintain an appropriate April 19, 2007 WE STP ARK =,.,1 BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT :ii; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX balance between the sign and wall. For example, a pillar between a door and window which is 30 inches wide may have a sign which is 21 inches wide. F. GLOSSARY Definition of terms shall be in accordance with the definitions of the BMC with the following additions and/or revisions. ARCADE A colonnade with arched openings. BLADE SIGNAGE A vertically oriented sign hung from, and perpendicular to, a facade so that it may be read by pedestrians on the sidewalk. BLOCK A unit of land bounded by streets on sides. BUILD-TO-LINE The line to which buildings are required to be built on their lot; no setback is permitted from it, except as noted in the guidelines. CHEEKWALL The side wall of a flight of stairs or steps. COLONNADE A covered passage way supported by column, and lintels open to the street with rectangular opemngs. COURTYARD A courtyard is a space defined by a single building on at least two sides, and a fence or building on all other sides. DOOR-YARD The Door-Yard is the area between the Build-to- Line and the public sidewalk. Planting, Porches, Lead Walks, Stoops and fence occurs within this area. FOOTPRINT The footprint is an outline showing the extent to which a home, building, or other architectural element covers the lot on the ground level. architectural element covers the lot on the ground level. FRONTAGE OCCUPANCY The minimum amount of primary fayade that must be built along a build-to-line. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FURNISHING ZONE A continuous zone extending the entire length of commercial and mixed-use streets parallel to the street and delineated from the back of curb, having a consistent width that is identified for the placement of permanent elements such as street trees, tree pits, tree grates, street lights, trash cans and benches. Moveable tables and chairs are not prohibited from this zone. GARDEN WALL A wall that separates courtyard, front yard, or service area from the street to screen private activities from the public realm. Garden Walls are independent walls between four (4) and eight (8) feet high. LEAD WALK Pavement that is intended for pedestrian travel to and from a building entryway, or courtyard, and the sidewalk. LIVE- WORK A live-work building/unit is one where the bottom floor is designed for commercial uses and the space above is designed for, and occupied by, residential uses. It is also designed such that the above residential unit could have direct access to the commercial space below if the residential occupant were also the commercial tenant or commercial owner, but can be secured (prohibiting access from the above residential unit to the commercial space below) if resident is not the commercial tenant or commercial owner. LOGGIA Similar to a porch, a loggia is a covered exterior space, but one that is set inside a facade (as opposed to a porch which protrude beyond the facade of a building. MIXED-USE BUILDING A building with two or more uses having a different use on the ground floor (e.g., retail on the ground floor and residential above). OPEN SPACE Area that is intended to provide light, air, and/or . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . views or general appearance of openness, and is designed for scenic, recreational, private, or environmental purposes. PAIRED FACADES Two facades next to each other, sitting in front of an open space with the same architectural design and character. RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE BUILDING A mixed-use building that requires residential on the second and higher floors. PORCH A porch is a covered, raised platform provided as a level entry into one's home. PRIMARY FACADE All elevations (Front and Side) that are parallel to, or are clearly visible from a street. SCREENING A natural or constructed barrier consisting of any landscaping, fencing, or other barrier intended to block a view. SECONDARY FA<;ADE All elevations that are not defined as a primary fa<;:ade. SET PIECE FACADE A primary facade in a prominent location that should be designed as a focal element with a greater amount of detail than the surrounding buildings. STOOP A raised, covered or non-covered, projection that extends from a building entryway at the ground floor of a building. STREET FRONTAGE The building or house facade running parallel to a Public Street or private street. STREET WALL & FENCE The street wall, or street face, is the visual three- dimensional wall that is formed by, and composed of, the primary facades located along the build-to line. THRESHOLD A passageway enclosed by buildings on both sides and above by building or other architectural elements, that one moves through to enter a space or street. WING WALL A live-work building/unit is one where the bottom floor is designed for commercial uses and the space above is designed for, and occupied by, residential uses. It is also designed such that the above residential unit could have direct access to the commercial space below if the residential occupant were also the commercial tenant or commercial owner, but can be secured (prohibiting access from the above residential unit to the commercial space below) if resident is not the commercial tenant or commercial owner.Ero odion vel utpatem illumsan henim dolore min eu facincidunt adio dip is num zzriust incidunt acipsustrud do conse tat Ian henim veliquat ullan eseniamet non velenim quatinim euguer sum do er at lum zzrillamet Ian ea at, sim nim acinci exer aliquam commoluptat auguera tiscipis alit lore conulputat. Agna at lorperos nim zzrit aut nullandipsum in henim veniam, commod magna feum erat, consed magna augiatummy num velent adit ut alit atet vercin et volum do elit acidunt loborperci tatum alit atummodolore tern num iureet, volobor eetuer sim dolesent iniamcon er accum vendre magna ad doluptatem ercilis ciduis nis eu feuguer sustrud magnisit iniam vel et alit etue eum ing ex er alisl utpatem dolutet prat iliscip sustrud dolore veliqui eu feum dio dolent eu feuisi bla facilit irit nit, velendre tern volobor SI. Na facidui psumsan ut W1Slm zzriure dolorer ostrud dolorem dolesequisl utatismod tern eugue do ea faci tincincip esed dolobore commy nostie tat lore feu facipissim dolorer aesequat. Te dolor at. Ut ilisl ullan eu faciliquis nulla facilla feu facilit la feugiamcon vel utpatin eum et wisci tat, quate mincidunt ver ilit vulla faci te molore modo odolor amconse ndreet lum in vero dolore del irit, verat ipsumsan hent doluptat et ad min ullamet, vulluptat. April 19, 2007 WESTPARK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . =Pfll BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT Iii: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v - DESIGN GUIDELINES Intent The intent of the Bremerton Housing Authority's Master Plan for the Westpark site is to have the community follow the principles of traditional neighborhood design. Early in the last century communities were much more pedestrian- friendly, street oriented and connected. Where in a traditional neighborhood one would see residential and commercial uses mixed, or in close proximity to each other, newer communities have segregated these uses, requiring residents to use their automobiles to do anything outside of their homes. The goal at Westpark is to encourage resident interaction by making the streets and buildings as pedestrian oriented as possible, and to provide mixed uses that allow residents to walk down the street to purchase some basic needs, rather than leaving the community and driving to a retail destination every time. The look and feel of the community should enhance the pedestrian experience, and the design concept of a varied and interesting village that has evolved and built up over time is a design objective. Large buildings should be designed such that their facades have the appearance of several smaller buildings, using varied colors and materials, to reduce their apparent scale. Houses and individual townhouse units should be designed to appear as unique buildings grouped together, rather than repetitions of the same fayade. Commercial and retail buildings should enhance the window shopping experience, and create a sense of liveliness and quality through the use of varying materials, colors, sign age and awnings. Commercial streets should contribute to this effect with enhanced paving materials, and the use of street trees, street furnishings and lighting. Commercial and mixed-use buildings should also appear to be composed of smaller buildings added over time, and have a timeless character, and a northwestern look and feel. This document is intended to act as an extension of Section IV Zoning and Development Standards. The Design Standards for the Westpark site are divided into the following topics: A. General Site Layout and Building Orientation B. Facades C. Entries D. Roofs E. Windows F. Walls G. Colonnades, Arcades, Loggias H. Columns 1. Balconies J. Colors K. Materials L. Lead walks M.Walls, Hedges & Fences N. Landscape Design O. Amenities A. General Site Layout and Building Orientation: 1. Anticipated building mix and site layouts within Westpark are outlined in Figures A-I and A-2. 2. Primary Building Facades should be oriented to the street. On corner lots, both street facades should use the primary fayade materials and fenestration types. 3. Buildings should be located at block corners. It is not desirable that any voids (what is left after subtracting the minimum frontage occupancy) be located at block corners. 4. Buildings shall meet the Build-to-Line and minimum frontage occupancy requirements indicated in the Zoning and Development Standards. 5. Buildings should generally be parallel to the right-of-way line except that special exceptions are allowed for topographic conditions or special urban design considerations. 6. The end units of courtyard arrangements should comply with the frontage conditions and building setbacks guidelines of the site planning section. 7. Parking shall occur behind the buildings that occupy the perimeter of the block. April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ ~ z: ~ I~ WI Q = :J o Z I( '''-l) 'v ::==:::) Wll iUU] Q > Z o C::::::::l [i=l U pq ~ ~ BUILDING MIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure A-l - Building Mix Matrix The diagram and chart on this page establish recommended building types for each individual block within the overall Westpark site. Where more than one building type is recommended on a block, a developer will have the flexibility to propose a layout of their choosing, provided it meets the plan's development standards and design guidelines. Types: The adjacent diagram and chart on this page depict the range of building types recommended in each block. Building Type Mix: A mix of building types is recommended throughout the Westpark site. , . 1lm'l.iJ1ID)~~ &oomI~[J[J lP ~UJbU ~=W [l, [l, = Ii Ii I } I J II f 1 I J I ~ ' f ~ jJ! d! I II H n II n f J d I jJ~d j j I . I I I &00 II . . . . 00 . . . . . . . . . . I I · I I . I . . . . I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _~ .._.._ u __ __. . . =~fI= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;i; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX Name Lot Configuration ~ !hf!dl :z =, ,~~ Axonometric [uy ((d) = d 0 Z U c=:=) ~ Section ~q 0 o 0 Lot Type > Average Unit Size Z Access ~, ..-:;:~ Open Space 10 C:::=::=I ~ tr- y (Uy ~ Precedent Images Type C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type D r m___ ----- ---- - - . -1 V - I I I m----i-- - ~ ._ _ .t~2.~-~.~ -t \ ~ HI.... Duplex 1,900-2,200 sJ. Duplex 1,400-1,700 sJ. From the Street From the Street Front/Rear Yard Front/Rear Yard '?4J =~~= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;i;i; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . Name Type E Type F ~:uml vI . . : I j lot Configuration i . . . . 18?] . [uq . z: =, . ,d Axonometric IUq f:J . ,D --- C=:=::I . :J . (] . Z V . l::==:=j Section ~ . (/-- IW . lot Type Townhouse Townhouse o 0 . Average Unit Size 1,000-2,000 sJ. 1,000-2,000 sJ. > . Access From the Street From the Street Z ___--.1 . Open Space Front/Rear Yard Front/Rear Yard 0 ':='=:::1 . U . iuq W)) . Precedent . Images . . . . April 19, 2007 . WESTPARK d~ . ~ w z ,= ,~ w (Q c===:] :J f?'9 ~ Z If 9 Y C:==::::I ~ ~ QI o 0 > 'Z ""==, o r====:\ IL- u-' U jULSl ~ d'@ Type G lot Configuration Type H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Axonometric Section lot Type Detached Cottage Court 2 over 1 Stack Flats Average Unit Size 1,200-1,700 sJ. 600-1,100 sJ. Access From Street thru Walk-ups Court ard Open Space Central Court/ Balcony Precedent Images =,'== BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;i; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Name Type I " , , i :c(~ IJ I ',000 lot Configuration Axonometric Section lot Type Average Unit Size Small Apt. Building 600-1,100 sJ. Access Common Lobby Open Space Balcony Precedent Images Type J r~ - - i _ T' -I [II n Ii t!:1 :1 I ti n Ii fI 1 fI 8 fi 8 '1 : J Apartments 600-1,100 sJ. Common Lobby Balcony April 19,2007 WESTPARK ~ iLiUJ ,= :J t:J B ~"" /~) i'=::::1 o 0 ~ ,-;o:::? L i~, V 1::==:=::1 If .~I 'j U P....Jl ~ ''%7) Name Type K lot Configuration ~ ~ Z = 1---11 Axonometric [uq ~ = ~ V Z Y =, W] Section ~1d] LEJ o 0 lot Type > Average Unit Size Z Access 0 Open Space I~l F' U PUI ~ Precedent Images i [j:; II iJ iI Ii :ill r n 1 '1 G 'J Bi ',J Condominium 600-1,100 sJ. Common Lobby Central Court/Balcony Type L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , c= . =~" ~ 'TI"::-- 1 I" 1 1 r r : I 11 [ i ], Iii Mixed - Use 600-1,100 sJ. Walk-ups d'm =,.,= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT =;;: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . B. Facades 1. Residential Buildings longer than 125' measured at the Build-to Line shall be designed to look like more than one building. 2. Primary Building Facades shall be oriented to the street. 3. A clear distinction between the ground floor base treatment and upper floor levels should be articulated (refer to Building Vertical Composition). 4. Buildings shall be located with front facades along Building Setbacks. 5. Buildings shall line the Build-to- Line in a continuous edge and shall meet the minimum frontage occupancy requirements. 6. In order to provide for facade articulation, building facades may step back a maximum of three feet (3') from the building setback lines for a maximum of 30% of the building face along a block face. 7. Townhouse strings that are designed as a symmetrical composition with the end units located along the building setback lines, with the middle units recessed no more than 6', and all the middle units having a continuous porch that occupies the Building Setbacks, should be permitted and should be counted as occupied frontage for the entire length of the building. 8. Buildings may step back from the Building Setbacks a maximum of 2' and still count toward Frontage Occupancy, but recessed portions of buildings may not exceed 30% of the frontage requirement. 9. Eaves of adjacent fa<;:ade sections shall vary in height. 1O.The ground floor and upper floor levels should be clearly distinguished through design. II.Buildings shall occupy the perimeter of a block and front facades shall face the street. C. Entries 1. Residential entries should be located at the street building front. 2. Service entrances should be at the rear of the buildings. 3. Entrances should be front. 4. Secondary entrances may be located at the rear and sides of buildings. 5. Ground floor units of apartment and condominium buildings should have individ- ual entries from the street. to second and third story uses located along the street building 6. Stacked Town Houses and Manor Houses should have only one set of stairs and one stoop on the primary fa<;:ade to access all units. 7. Stacked Town House and Manor House entries, stoops, and stairs on primary facades should be set at an elevation that is a maximum of 1/2 of a story in height from the sidewalk elevation. 8. All entries on primary facades should be higher than the sidewalk elevation. 9. Front entries shall be architecturally well- defined and visible from the street except in cases where the lead walk and architectural detailing make the path to the front door obvious and where the design of a duplex or triplex is such that ensemble is meant to resemble one large house. 1 O.Front porches should be a minimum of 6' deep with a 5' minimum usable depth. D. Roofs 1. Dormers should be placed a minimum of 3' from side building walls. 2. Roof penetrations, except cement plaster or brick chimneys, should not be easily visible from streets, or should be painted to match the. color of the roof. 3. Gable ends on all roofs, stoops, porches, and balconies should have no less than a 6 in 12 pitch. 4. Hip roofs should have no less than a 6 in 12 pitch. 5. Roof-vent penetrations should be located at least 10'-0" from any exterior building face. April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ W Z = ,---5] [Lq rD C::===::1 ::;J tdJ z. if '::=;j V '':::=:::::J o 0 '~ I~ '2 ~----:\ o c.:::.=:::::1 f) F.:1 U ~1 '0'] ~ W)) py z r:::::=::l ~l py (Q C===:) :J l} ~ ~ (] c=:==:) W)) (Q o 0 > Z o =, iL-, u-- U fL-J0J W)) 6. All hipped or gabled roofs must have eaves. 7. Gutters and downspouts, when used, shall be made of galvanized steel, copper (not copper coated), or aluminum. 8. Attic vents shall be appropriate to the style. E. Street Frontage Windows 1. Specialty windows (oval, octagonal, Palla- dian, etc.) are restricted to one per section of facade. 2. Triangular windows are not permitted. 3. Openings for windows and window panes should have a vertical dimension greater than or equal to the horizontal dimension. 4. Exterior shutters, where used, should be sized and mounted appropriately to fit their window. 5. It is encouraged that windows on the primary or street fa<;:ade be "Simulated True Divided Light". 6. Glass block is not permitted where visible from the street. 7. Windows may be grouped, if separated by a mullion at least 5" wide, to create a horizon- tal composition. The maximum combined horizontal dimension should not exceed three times the combined vertical dimension. 8. Window sills should project a minimum of 1" from the Building Face. 9. Doors, except garage doors, should be, or appear to be, constructed of planks or raised panels (not flush with applied trim). 10. Where masonry is used, all entryway and window openings should use concrete, or masonry lintels. 11. All window trim should be a minimum of 3 112" in width. 12. Any building utilizing masonry or cement plaster as the exterior material shall have windows inset at least 2". 13. Windows shall be clear glass. No reflective or tinted glass is permitted. F. Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Designs and materials should be consistent on all primary facades. 2. Accessory Buildings shall be constructed of the same materials as the principal structure. 3. Foundation walls of stoops and porches must be consistent with the foundation treatment of the building. 4. Wood elements such as trim and visible window framing should be painted or sealed with an opaque or semi-solid stain. G. Colonnades, Arcades & Loggias 1. The vertical dimension of the openings between columns, piers, or posts on colonnades or arcades should be at least 1.0 times the horizontal dimension of the openings. H. Columns 1. Columns may be composed of brick, stone or simulated stone alone or in combination with colored pre-cast concrete, and/or painted or stained wood timbers. 2. Columns should relate to the architecture of the adjacent structure, and of adequate thickness relative to the scale of the building and the material used. I. Stoops Porches and Balconies 1. All residential buildings should have either a covered stoop or door casing appropriate to the style. 2. The vertical dimension of the openings between columns, piers, or posts on a porch, stoop, or balcony should be at least 1.6 times the horizontal dimension of the openings. 3. Screens are not permitted on stoops, porches, or balconies facing the street. 4. Balconies shall be structurally supported by, or include decorative brackets or beams when facing public streets. 1m) ..iII. B .:.~. FUMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;iiiiil TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. Porches and stoops should be a minimum of 12" above the adjacent sidewalk elevation. 6. Balconies are permitted to wrap around corners. J. Colors 1. Colors should be consistent with the style. 2. Garish, Neon, or otherwise "Loud" colors may not be used. 3. A variety of materials and colors should be used throughout the Westpark site. Fa<;:ade colors shall be used strategically to create a sense of diversity (while maintaining harmony), and to reinforce the urban design. Interspersing occasional dark siding colors is encouraged. It is strongly encouraged that a color consultant be retained by the developer or builder to assist in overall neighborhood color palette selection and in identifying color placement on facades throughout the neighborhood. 4. Changes in color from one town house unit to another are strongly encouraged, but shall only occur when there is a break in the building wall plane. 5. Each townhouse or stacked townhouse unit should appear to be a separate building. A maximum of four town houses or four stacked townhouse units on a block or street may have the same color fa<;:ade. Matching units should not be adjacent to one another. K. Materials 1. Materials that should be utilized on all facades of buildings include: a. Natural materials such as brick, stone and stucco or EIFS wood siding. Metal (either corrugated or in shingle) b. Fiber cement siding (such as Hardiplank, Hardishingle, and Harditrim) c. Simulated stone that accurately mImICS natural stone. d. Vinyl siding and trim is prohibited. 2. Roofing materials that should be utilized on all types of roofs include: a. Wood shingles b. Slate shingles c. Metal standing seam roofs n are permitted only on commercial buildings. d. Architectural Grade asphalt shingles. e. Trim materials that should be utilized include: 1. Wood 2. EIFS 3. Synthetic Board (synthetic wood product) 4. Fiber cement trim material 5. Extruded polyurethane (such as Fypon) is only permitted as trim material on buildings with a flat roof. 3. Windows: a. For brick and stone facades, vinyl windows shall have an oversized moulding surround that measures a minimum of 3 1/2" and shall be recessed into the brick face. b. For facade clad with siding, vinyl windows shall have trim appropriate to the architectural style (consistent in style, dimensions, and placement). 1. Lead Walks 1. General Development Guidelines: a. Lead walks should be constructed using the standards shown in Figures Ll, L2 and L3 below. 2. Materials: a. Special paving materials and/or patterns are encouraged for lead walks. Appropriate materials: stone (native or faux), concrete, (can be colored/stamped), brick or precast concrete pavers, decomposed granite or gravel. Clay tile and asphalt are not appropriate materials. b. Steps and landing lead walks shall be constructed of the same material. Railing on site steps (if required) shall match front porch railings. c. If retaining walls are necessary at the sidewalk to achieve finished grades, they should be brick or stone veneer and/or should match the masonry elements of the house. April 19. 2007 ~ ~y Z I~ ,d pq La ,= d o z;: :lJ) (~'::I ~ \lcl!dl ~ (01 i__1 o 0 ~, ,~ ? ~ o ===:::::1 i' ir' U [Lrq ~ WESTPARK ~3l] to] [hl:q 2: c==::) ,d [ULiJ [Cd} c====::! ~ o z o 1===:1 ~ :hJJd [Cd} > :z o I~j F' tJ [uq to] t:l22 00 d. Front entries should be architecturally well-defined and visible from the street except in cases where the lead walk and architectural detailing makes the path to the front door obvious and where the design of a duplex or triplex is such that the ensemble is meant to resemble one large house. e. Special paving materials and/or patterns are encouraged for lead walks. Appropriate materials: stone (native or faux), concrete, (can be colored/stamped), brick or precast concrete pavers, decomposed granite or gravel. Inappropriate materials: clay tile, asphalt. f. Lead walks should provide a direct con- nection to the front entry Figure L -1 - Lead Walk Slope ,,",,!.!NO- M. Walls, Hedges & Fences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I , I I , 1.fAOWAU< I I i I TO c.ook I~sr~ '"'"' ... ..." ,"" '" ....e i~~ 1. General: Garden walls, retaining walls, hedges, and fences should be used to define the edge between the public street and private yards. 2. Materials: a. Garden walls, privacy walls, and fences in rear yards visible from streets other than alleys shall generally be constructed of the same material as the first floor of the primary building, and they shall be coordinated with the architectural detailing of the primary facade. b. Retaining walls shall be masonry or stone when forward of the Build-to-Line. c. Chain link fences shall be black. d. Front yard fencing shall have a consistent height of forty-two inches (42") from finished grade. e. The top of fence shall remain level in stepped conditions. f. Preferred building materials for perimeter fencing include masonry or stone walls, or 'open' (non-solid) fencing. Chain link is prohibited. g. Fence designs should have a desirable appearance from both sides except when one side is adjacent to a critical area or not visible from a public area. h. The style of front yard fences and walls should be consistent with the architectural style of the home. i. Side yard fences attached to a house should have an opening or gate on at least one side of the house to allow for access between front and back yards. j. Wall treatments viewed from public spaces should be consistent in treatment with the house. k. Landscape walls, when used, should be stone, brick, pre-cast concrete with corresponding caps 1. Retaining walls, when visible from public spaces or common areas should be constructed of masonry. m. Landscaping adjacent to public areas should not create a visual "wall". Mirem'.. i!l, '~, \\' MInImIlim .tl,h ~. =~~= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT ;;;: TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHIP-PARAMETRIX SUlEWAJj( Figure L-2 - Lead Walk and Steps (~ ./ "- ~.... ~ / r1 l~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. Landscape Design side yard property lines or adjacent to public spaces/common areas shall comply with the fence height restrictions for these same areas. 7. Courtyards, decks, and outdoor spaces should be designed to emphasize the outdoor lifestyle of the northwest. 8. Significant trees and vegetated areas should be preserved in both initial and future development work on site. 1. Design courtyards, decks, and outdoor spaces to emphasize the outdoor oriented lifestyle of the Northwest. Landscape design of private lots should blend the architecture with the natural environment. 2. Landscape structures, site walls, and outdoor areas should use natural and indigenous building materials. Wood, stone or simulated stone building materials that complement both the architecture and the natural environment should be incorporated into the landscape designs. 3. In the public realm fountains, and public art and other signature landscape elements are encouraged and shall reviewed by the Westpark Design Review Committee. 4. At installation, all plant materials should be of a size that visually supports the size and scale of the architecture and the neighborhood. 5. When used in combination with walls or rockeries, plant materials shall be a minimum of 80% native and/or drought tolerant evergreen varieties. 6. The height of landscaping along the front and o. AMENITIES: 1. Seating: a. Decorative Benches with backs to the street shall be provided in the furnishing zone along Arsenal Way, Oyster Bay Avenue and other commercial streets. Benches shall be 5 to 6 feet in length. There should be an average of 1 bench (per each side of the street) per 240 linear feet of street in retail area. 2. All fountains, art and built forms visible from the public realm are subject to review by the Westpark Design Review Committee and should be appropriately scaled, designed and sited. Figure L-3 - Grade Change at Facade EVATION I I ..~I . .". ...:.... ....J:.:.1 ALLE" -C. ~ ~7~1~~,,\ ::;i'}',i:l /--') N \ '~"""""""'F .':........:..-... . r '. '. . . . '. . April 19, 2007 WESTPARK ~ W z C::::::=:.1 Id W Q t:=:=:=:':1 ::J 1Jl Z 1Jl ,-I ~ [Uldl Q 00 > z o c:=.:=:::.i fL.----"i U- U ib-~l ~ ST [:~ ~ ~ z =1 I~ ~ ~ ,=:j ~ V 'Z 2, V I:::=:=::I ~ iL.q Q) :> Z o \::::=::'I [P U if:JUl W] 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ =,,.= BREMERTON HOUSING AUTHORITY-MARATHON DEVELOPMENT liii; TORTI GALLAS AND PARTNERS-RICE FERGUS MILLER-THE BERGER PARTNERSHII'-PARAMETRIX