HomeMy WebLinkAbout4962
ORDINANCE NO. +q (p'J-
I AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Brem&rton, Washington, amending the Comprehensive Plan by
add\n~ the East Park Sub Area Plan, and amending the Zoning
Code !Section 20.80.080(b) to activate the development standards
for dWelling unit density, setbacks, and road standards as detailed
in this' ordinance.
I
I
I
WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act authorizes the
preparation of sub-area plans; and
I
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has adopted a comprehensive plan under the
provisions of Chapter 36.70A RCW that includes policies for the creation of sub-area plans, and
specifically for the site known as East Park; and
,
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has zoned the East Park site as a Master
Development (MD) Zone, which promotes the creation of public-private partnerships to create
large-scale planned ~evelopments that provide a clear community benefit and satisfy unique
community needs; an,d
I
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has worked with a private developer, Lyle
Homes, to conduct aA extensive public participation and review process for preparation of the
East Park Sub-Area J?lan and development regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City ofBremerton has worked with Lyle Homes in the
I
preparation of the Ea~t Park Sub-Area Plan and conducted a thorough review of the development
anticipated within the East Park Sub-area, and on November 23,2005 the City issued a State
r .
Environmental Policy Act (SEP A) Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) that
provided for mitigatibn measures to ensure that future development will not create adverse
environmental impac~s; and
,
,
WHE~AS, on December 5, 2005 the SEP A MDNS appeal period expired and
no appeals were filed; and
I
I
WHEREAS, on November 1,2005 the Planning Commission held a workshop to
discuss the proposed ISub-Area Plan and development regulations, on November 15,2005 the
Commission conducted a public hearing on the plan, and on December 20, 2005 the Commission
concluded their delibbrations and made a recommendation for the City Council's consideration;
and I
I
WHEREAS, on January 18, 2006 the City Council conducted an additional public
hearing so that the p~blic had a further opportunity to comment on the sub-area plan and
development regulatipns; NOW THEREFORE, .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
East Park Sub-Area Plan
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council accepts and adopts the Findings and Conclusions
of the Planning Commission as presented in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this
reference as if set forth in full herein.
SECTION 2. The Comprehensive Plan is amended by the addition of the East
Park Sub-Area Plan as presented in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference
as if set forth in full herein.
SECTION 3. Section 20.80.080 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Sub-
Area Plans" is hereby amended to read as follows:
20.80.080 SUB-AREA PLANS.
The following are identified areas where sub-area plans may be created and
unique development regulations created for each:
(a) Westpark Sub-Area Plan;
(b) East Park Sub-Area Plan(adopted by Ordinance No. 4-9~a);
(c) Austin Drive Sub-Area Plan;
(d) Harrison Employment Center
(e) Northwest Corporate Campus Employment Center;
(f) Port Blakely Employment Center.
A specific sub-area plan has been adopted and is in effect when the project name
listed above is followed by an ordinance number - this ordinance will contain the
unique regulations and standards that guide development for that project area.
SECTION 4. Severability. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTIONS. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the I !l.:t:AJ
day of C9Q -;u..ull.1 r
,2006
2
East Park Sub-Area Plan
~ '2~
~
CARY~M- N,M;;y~-;:
Approved this ~~ day of
ATTEST:
P
PUBLISHED the~~ day of.
EFFECTIVE the ~ day of
ORDINANCE NO. 49~e:<
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~;:;:A:JI~
,2006
,2006
R A. LUBOVICH, City ttomey
R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Community Development\East Park Sub-Area Plan.doc
3
East Park Sub-Area Plan
Exhibit A
Findings & Conclusions
'. ;.", f ~..'--
" ~, ~
Exhibit A
. DRAFT FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION
Summary - Proposal to include the East Park Sub-Area Plan to the Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Code by amendment. The zoning code will ;:idd reference in BMC
20.80.080 to the East Park Sub-Area Plan.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Project Description
East Park is a forty-six (46) acre vacant site in East Bremerton that was
previously Navy housing and is designated in the 2004 Comprehensive Plan as a Public
Sector Redevelopment Site (PSRS). The developer, East Park LLC, purchased the site
from the City of Bremerton according to a development agreement and has worked with
the city to prepare the proposed East Park Sub Area Plan. Mithun, an architectural firm
hired by the developer, has worked with city staff to conduct community and stakeholder
meetings to help determine the public's vision for East Park. The draft plan was
submitted to the city at the end of October and presented to the Planning Commission
on November 1, 2005 at a special workshop. The next step in the Sub-Area Plan
process is for the Planning Commission to review the Plan and recommend to City
Council the adoption of amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning code.
2. Procedural History
2.1 On June 25, 2005 the first neighborhood meeting was held inviting public
questions and comments.
2.2 On July 26,2005, the second neighborhood meeting was held showing the
progress and inviting further public questions and comments.
2.3 On October 6,2005, a stakeholders meeting was held showing the Sub-Area
Plan's progress and inviting questions and comments.
2.4 On November 1, 2005, the Planning Commission was presented with the
Sub-Area plan at a special workshop. Citizen stakeholders testified at the meeting
indicating their support for the plan that was drafted.
2.5 On November 3, 2005, the 60 day required notification was sent to the
Department of Community Trade and Economic Development (CTED).
2.6 On November 5, 2005, notice of Planning Commission public hearing was
published in the Kitsap Sun and the public was invited to comment.
2.8 On November 15, 2005, Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on
the East Park Sub-Area plan.
3.0 On December 20, 2005 the Planning Commission completed deliberations on
the sub-area plan and formulated a recommendation for City Council's
consideration.
Exhibit A
3. Public Comment
3.1 Numerous individuals have provided comments at public workshops and
.stakeholder meetings. Comments received were considered and used to develop
the draft plan that was submitted to the City on October 27, 2005.
3.2 The planning process included a "Stakeholder Committee" comprised of the
following members:
a. Eugene Brennan, Manette Resident
b. John Burch, Manette Resident
c. Wendy Clark-Getzin, Kitsap Transit
d. Walt Draper, Bremerton School District-Director of Finance
e. Lea Duffy-Kosusko, RFM Architects/Manette Resident .
f. Glen Godforoy, Bremerton YMCA
g. Doug Groneman, Parks Commission/Ulahee Forest Steward
h. Martha Groneman,' Manette Resident
i. Elizabeth m. Hyde, BremertQ<n School District-Superintendent
j. Doug Johnson, Kitsap Transit
k. Floyd Johnson, Bremerton Ice Arena-General Manager
I. Deb McDaniel, Manette Resident
m. Daren Nygren, City Council-Bremerton District 3
n. David Olson, Harrison Hospital-Vice President Business Development
o. Rut Reese~ Manette Business Owner and Resident
p. Mike Short, City Council-Bremerton District 9
q. Julie Wasserburger, Manette Resident
r. Leo Wasserb,urger, Manette Resident
s. Rebecca Wilson, Manette Resident
3.3 Individuals providing verbal testimony at the Planning Commission Workshop on
November 1, 2005:
a. Deborah McDaniel; Manette Resident
b. Adam Brockus, 1146 Perry Avenue
c. John Stokes, 2547 Greenwood Dr
d. Floyd Johnson, Bremerton Ice Skating Center
e. Chris Campagna .
f. Matthew Keough, KRC. 1201 Park Ave.
g. Leo Wasserburger, Callahan Drive
h. Eugene Brennan, Manette Resident
3.4. Individuals providing verbal tes.timony at the Planning Commission public
hearing held on November 15, 2005:
a. Glen Godfrey, YMCA 60 Magnuson Way
b. Lon Overson, 1 035 Callahan Drive
c. Ailene Mueller, 2215 Winfield Avenue
d. Dick BrUskrud, 1102 Shore Drive
e. Adam Brockus, 1146 Perry Avenue
Exhibit A
4. SEPADetermination '.
A thorough review of the development anticipated within the East Park Sub-area was
conducted and a SEPA anticipated Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance
(MONS) was advertised with a public c.omment period that began November 7, 2005
and ended on November 21,2005. The mitigation measures were drafted to ensure
that future development will not create adverse environmenta"1 impacts. Staff issued the
final MONS on November 23, 2005, with an administrative appeal deadline of
December 5, 2005. No appeals were filed.
5. Consistency
. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall meet the decision criteria outlined in
BMC 21.06.080. The Planning Commission may recommend, and the City Council may
adopt or adopt with modifications, an amendment to the comprehensive plan if the
criteria outlined below are met.
5.1 BMC 21. 06. 080(A) allows amendments tothe Comprehensive Plan if there is an
obvious technical error in the pertinent comprehensive plan provisions.
This is not applicable to this project
5.2 BMC 21.06.080(B) allows amendments to the Comprehensive Plan if the
following criteria have been met. .
5.2 (1) The amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act;
This amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act (GMA) by
meeting the criteria of the Comprehensive Plan which was created to achieve the
13 goals of theGMA. The Sub-Area. Plan meets the housing goal by providing a
mixed use dense housing stock. It meets the open space and recreation goal by
creating a green street and wildlife corridor, and the creation of parks. . It will
reduce sprawl and promote urban growth by creating a dense mixed use
environment.
5.2 (2) The amendment is consistent with the comprehensive plan or other goals
or policies of the City;
The East Park Sub-Area Plan is consistent with page 84 of the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map because it designates the site as a Public
Sector Redevelopment Site (PSRS), and identifies the project as a site where
"specific area plan" should be developed. Also; in the Land Use Element, page
LU-24, describes in more detail the need to create this specific area plan. The
creation of the sub-area plan for East Park therefore implements the vision and
goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
5.2 (3) If the amendment was reviewed but not adopted as a part of a previous
proposal, circumstances related to the proposed amendment have significantly
changed, or the needs of the City have changed, which support an amendment;
Exhibit A
This amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is being directed by the
Comprehensive Plan. The amendment does not change the plan, rather it
supplements it based on the direction of the Comprehensive plan to develop
specific area plans for Public Sector Redevelopment Site.
5.2 (4) The amendment is compatible with existing or planned land uses and the
surrounding development pattern;.
The East Park Sub-Area Plan is Gompatible with adopted Public Sector
Redevelopment Site land use and the surrounding development pattern.
5.2 (5) The amendment will not adversely affect the City's ability to provide urban
services at the planned level of service and bears a reasonable relationship 'to
benefitting thepublic health; safety and welfare.
.. The East Park Sub-Area Plan will not adversely affect the City's ability to
provide urban services at the planned level of service. The amendment will
benefit the public health, safety and welfare by achieving some of the City's
economic development goals. Applicable goals include: A. EC 1 Promote a
vibrant envirionment for economic development, and H6 Build strong, cohesive
neighborhoods with a majority of Bremerton households owning their own
homes.
5.3 Amendments to the Zoning Code
Zoning code text amendments shall meet the decision criteria outlined in BMC
20.18.020 (d). The Planning Commission may recommend, and the City Council may
adopt or adopt with modifications, an amendment to the zoning code text if the criteria
outlined below are met.
5.3(1) 20.18.020 allows amendments to the Zoning Code if It is consistent with the
goals and policies of the ComprehenSive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shows the EastPark site as a Public
Sector Redevelopment Site (PSRS) and directs the redevelopment to provide areas
for large scale planned developments, which is achieved by this Plan. The Sub-
Area Plan is consistent with several goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan
-in the environmental, transportation, housing, community character, and-land use
elements. Goal E6 encourages developments to protect, preserve and restore the
habitats that support Bremerton!s diverse ecosystems. East Park will preserve the
native forest along the western and eastern boundaries linked by a natural corridor.
Goal H3 dfthe Comprehensive Plan is to provide a variety of housing types and
densities to meet changing needs of Bremerton residents, East Park is providing
housing for a diverse demographic group by building accessory dwelling units,
carriage homes, cottages, affordable two storyfamilyhomes and luxury homes.
Goal CC3 asks developments to provide for a safe, pleasant and rich pedestrian
experience. East Park's combination of tree lined streets with sidewalks and
greenways provide a safe and plea~ant pedestrian experience.
Exhibit A
5.3(2) 20. 18.020 allows amendm(7nts to the Zoning Code if it does not conflict with
other City; state and federal codes, regulations and ordinances.
The East Park Sub-Area plan does not conflict with any other regulations.
II. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION
. Based on the findings above, the Planning Commission concludes that The East Park
Sub-Area Plan has met the requirements for 1) amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
and 2) text amendments to the zoning code as detailed in BMC 20.18.020. Therefore
the Commission recommends the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to include
the East Park Sub-Area Plan and an amendment to the zoning code text in BMC.
20.80.080 (b) to include the Ordinance number of the East Park Sub-Area plan.
Respectfully submitted by:
-,_,t,t..C'~"'''--
...-
\
\.~
Approved by:
.;;;L
air
Exhibit B
East Park Sub-Area Plan
'(f};'\
6;',~~~' t; .
()> '<"".:"1\-
;~S~i'~;;. ":Y';
U. 'I,
O~\:,;<,
,0':::'"
.0',,';'
,'.. '''t
'}~~
C:r'~,
r"\ ',~'
\:$J., ,
'0"'" '
" '
S'
Ct"
8__
Q"
'0
'Q~
0'. ',,'::<";,
'. . _'" \ J: :-., ~,' >,
-,~ . ~ " '" ~.- ,- $
t1:..;,~;:(."
"
,
~ . , .
.;: '~ f,'
:~ .~,\
,'~~,#(
.' ,
;".~ i ~~'Yt~~J;,~;!};t:f~~>~,~?t1t'j,i:~~~i~j::.'
("
(
"
I
("
I
(
(-
(
(
i
'-
(
~:?~tr:~I:~~'
r--., 0
I [) \ rv:;::,n ,~--~
A ~"'~)t' ,> ~j ~ 1
_~ '-__" ..!(::)_J ~
r~" _ '
! ~ ;YOY(-.;r~;;\.~~
u u ~.:.."j.~~:;..r
r~:;:~;;~~~~J
'j' .,~~1 ..." "<;:..' 1"\
" L'~ ;:)';0 ~;,~
[, ~:.;~~ .,>J~ \i.- ",r~!
ll~l~i!
,ilillWf.A:ig\~:l?>
\1'!;:;z,d:f~:~,~,':c.;:1\!
bI)
s:::::
--
s:::::
s:::::
ns
Q:
CU
>
--
C/)
s::
CU
..c
~
c..
E
o
l)
[Qj~O~LfU
rD~'~/?~X?0<
LJlf\.S\.:::-^~~::..;
n
o
3
"C
-.:
(1)
::r
(1)
:3
en
-.
<
(1)
::2
su
:s
::s
-.
::s
UQ
pacific dogwood
f " ~. - "l"OV'
M' , \'!"*..."
!: ; ~;::':,~
. -
- , '
proposed forest trail
head
: ,,~p~;:;, '
_..~,rl,~-~,
existing site trees
1-0) 0
1 l~""~ o/...~.
! D,~<:'\D@7~ l
._,,' ,:::::;e..; (~)u L
G '
~..tQVrlg~~~~
lJlf~':j _:::X::_ ~,..?
r;.:=::::z.:~::'Z::::i~?jl
i 'j~' '"Of"''''']' 1
Ii ;::~;y} ;'~"?~,=,,'1
l" Ii ,;,c~"'<':cH
t~t:r~;ltl
j.~~QI>;~-f.",H
CI~i~~~ li) i'A-Fv,,/tJ
EB
..,I
b.O
b
.~
b
b
~
is:
Q)
>>
o<=>
(V)
~
(iJ
...s::
Q)
~
C"
E
o
u
:,
, ,
CQNCEPTUALSTORMWATER EXHIBIT
LEGEND
RAIN GA,RDEN
PARK (PERVIOUS SURFACE)
INFILTRATION SWALE
.
,'~
, .....
-==D>
CONVEYANCE SWAlE
INFILTRATION TRENCH
EXl5TlNG'STORM SYSTEM
~
;frr~~~{~.,~t
f' b t,",<.,.,J. 'l.'
r~C'~~ ~~\t,~~~
. ..' " h'l "jI1JJi
r~0~ \~~ )'4~j
If)
o
3
~
~
:r
('I)
:s
U'l
;:r
(l)
~
!Y
d
:3
<=00
:3
Otl
Irc)v:'y;;;yOO "'--;:r-""-'
L..::0\~) it~Lnj
j "~\ --....r-- ---..,,--.
l ~ ('\ /c'?r(' ~ ~1..~;Z
l; J \....'!)~J.:'::::X':vt::::J
CIRCULATION HIERARCHY EXHIBIT
LEG EN D
EXISTING STREET
~~~~
'~'!'fl";,~/
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET
MAQNUSON AND EASTERN B?UNDARY
WOONEEU:
AllEY
GREEN STREET
~:,
E9
..!
.""
:.-P._~ -.. --.------ ___._____._______0___ - ---- --------.~---.--~---.~. -..- -.~. .--.-.--- --- ..-. ---. --.--- .-- . . -- .----.. ~.l
I
. .. , I
, . I
:-- - .. ... - .. -. -: ,~'(,;,,' ?;;;/;~.: ~~.. ,. .,Ii ~...; ,;::', '.. ..~ :~. ' ,
18 : _._. _ . ,,_... __ ___.____ _.___ _.____._..~_,. . .:,.. _ __. .~~<"...:~ _'~~~_ _ ~~:.~~~~ i:~._. 1'~},~ '\ .:. :"~.":~ . . .__..::~~~__.~_._;
q~~~~B(~ZC(jl
L .3e L t:;:J J w
lDM-;v-;:.7,~~
LJ"U\~:.A~~~)e)
f-:..::t:~:u. .:,~.:i":".l.-..._,!'i...:. !'
r,~~,,~~~~~~~~~
t1~~11{1.j)Jt!
:Jr~';> or, ~llt.1
i " '-, ".-
!
i
!
j
j:J.,~
. .~.' ~
:,~~);.om :OOneri fir~ la'ne
, ',."j." ",'" , .'
..~j.: 1'><:,.,' " .
..., ,_;; 15,~:<,~ff~~ .IT?1!1 Schl~ Blvd.
:~ ~"" ~,,4 ,
-''-," ,
"~,'
\I7
I
...
bJ)
C.
--
C
s:
ns
-
C.
<IJ
>
--
(I)
C
<IJ
..s::
QJ
"-
c..
E
o
u
EMERGEN~YVEHICLI;: COV"ERAGE EXHIBIT
- -~---- --.---.---------- .~---..___.. . _~ ..._,__._. .__ _._.._ ___ _ _.______ ~ u ____ _ ~_. ____~.___ _ ~ ._... _.
. ,
, .
.' ..._ l"" .
I : .: ;; f.~.''':' ,;) - ~;;;~, . '~-,':,': '~ : /~~,' . . I.' ..~;.., . ,"-- - -_.'
. .' , , ... ~ 4~........t.ii '~. ..:~. f y'" ! ~'" ., I.l-Io;..... I _ f r ! 1 9
-- .-. .-. -----. -----. . -- ________._ .~.. ._ _.___..__. . __ ____. _H __.___ h_.. _ _ __ ___ _____.. __._ _._~______ __~____. __. __
n
o
3
"0
(iJ
::::r
CD
:::s
(/)
<"
CD
"0
-
Q)
:::s
:::s
--
:::s
CtQ
i~ '-", 0
't' D ~~n0f-'--li I
_A"?"h -l'.:)- J
rDP-,rfoVE:CX{0'
u~lJ\..::.~'::'::' ~~~
~ ---- . -~ - - - ----~----_... ... . ------.~ ---. - --- --- ------ -- ....--.---- ------- .. -. ----- .-.---_." ... -- .---.- ----..- -- - - --- -. - ----.- - . - .-..
, . i
: . i
'--20' .-: . ~__.... _n______.__.____ .._____~._._~__ <~_):._. _: _~_~~ _'.~__ _. :~~~~_ _~~~~.-~~~~~..~~. ..... >_______~_j
'~'~(:~~":J,;r'c ~!;!f " .': '~1~~;
<.
~~~~~1~>~ '.~~~'<~~~J.-::f~;~~' ;:0~;:~~,~~:':r:;).
. .::'<." " .... ", " '.,."" " ; " L~~ ......,v.
~ , ,:;: ..... ,. , " ,'"J "' ~ ",.> ..'~j:, t.. ~ q~..A..,,\ '>J~f~':j.":<,
\) <""'.,l( \ ., ., . '.\, ~'}d~""':.'. .~~.: 'l'\~!, .r2t\~...~~...
~""t.,'" ,\ ' ..... 'l/"'J t <. .,.~~ .. ~...., ~ :~.1. ..-
_ : Q .::'o~'~t' ~'''':~ c: \;~"J :~;~;)."~~:::.';':~~ :.>.~)~;;t:
',~ . ;', .;;*} ,~. fE; :,:" 't)l~':.' ,'( ;""1r~.:~;r:::',
,~ ~ ~->.~. (...;~t....-.~:#'f~"'/'~"'.t\ ",.,,'''.~
. o.'V,' >o.' '<~ ~{ .' . ." .
~ i'1 ";'r1-t"" .........-i... ';." 1'"".~..1.. ,/iK} i.:~.<:"~<f<:
- <2-~,:;;~ .1" e" "..~:(.:~" ::"A:~~~ I;.~):- ~ '~~\;.$~~~~;"~;-"
. . "o..,,{,, "'" . Ji-.1f';." '1""1--~"",.i!, .
~ : :.~~r :,." :~~'('- .,...~ ~}' ~~~,..l"~k;\'" ..~.~ <t~<t~6)~.,;k ..... ~
, . '. i'"'' ~..' , ".., '.:, "! ,~!4!':I": ii,'-S: \ "J:;~. - .~'.tjt .. ' '" ':N.,
.' ',.,. ~ " '<;.., . ~,,;:;,.~ Cr, '. ' ~~"~~lr,' .. ~1J;"
#:.: ; i'T ,p' ~ t! - "---'-- -- I -- :'.#~::'?:~.:/ ,
, :~n" J ~1 :~~~.4' '7 1.~
t -II- I"'j 00;\ ~\.'~ i"t'.\~
." :,,:-~;~~ ~*,J.,~~~~~\~~
".:.,_:..),"' -";:,..~~"- '..- ~~~ )-'~)?k ")
r.... ,~o1V;..'~;":i', ~,,::':,'f-,."{":'>~'~l
~ ~ ".,-.-". . f-" ~,~
..~, . ,/ ~,,;,:}~~,:;
~~1'.~, '~ 'f'i ..
t"\r. '~f, . t ,> ~,,' ..
:f}JAA~;:vi<~~:.
~~{~~,;:;
,'. ,.~:~~,,,-,t
>~:: '>:.~{!~~.~
~ ..~' " ,t..~~' 'tf,
~'A~/;-:,~~. ,{ ~ ,"'; ~
. "-~:;:"'l'~"\'; ~/,<
,'" ':~,:.
, ~'l<"
. ' -q :..;tl
tl~\J.~~~ ~?
~=----- tl ""';'"'j
,,~.'tt.':': ,;~':,;'l
~' w_ ~ : ':';~;f;'l
ffi~ r '.: '~~.>i'l
,', ',-, I",;~~
~,:_<:',;~~~\~~~o. ." J~;...,
. .- . ";' ':""c' ".---~:J~;:>~'
-:--:-:'.,~" . " ~t:~ '," ~ ,~,~~..:.:.~>"':.,
~1;", '. ~~#ct~.
'. ::m'~ ;",: ~. .,.%,'~,,,
~ }~~'1~:.1'.;,,t,,,,,: "-~~~j
'-=~~~-.:c"""'l' , . - '. ~:I "
~ '.
~!, >.'
r;:J~i; ,
r' ,r" ;>,<
'~;;,-':.;
r\%'
r,
. '.
;'"~
'~T.~r~::'~:"~"',i.~..~,~;L,~,:\,~,,'<::,f~ '.' 11" ,,".' ,
, ,"', "C1?;T~S?;-"C
.
~::\.'~7'~'7:~}f~~,~(r:: :
.' ' .' ",'.: ~~ l-t,,~>~ ,"
y,. .,;....~f:,;p;.~< if''''
;;;t~~ifI~ .
~. ""T "'-."< FfjG~"'-,
(. ,,~.... . - ,. t ....- ....i1t.~:",
~ J')" ~_:,' ~7 "''; 4'~~
'.+c,:~.;,;, ';~' ',~~;J~
,'.. .~Y."
"}', ~ "t'W(ll ~:
':'~:i.:,j'1} ,;::~
{:? '
^t;t:,:~>
7~U~!J~::
'! },' ~,",~,.,.
· . ....'~~t:~.
~ : ..
,,~':'1
,.J
;~ 1
;,~\'
'?;
;-~,~~,~
~.,;' ,..~,~ .::. 'f~{'\,
,. _~ ~.'1>{'tl~'/~
~~~tr
."'....-
".', ~ \..
~~:(1:~::~:~~
t"f:~''''' ~',~ ; ~.C
(flhJ' ~j - ~,""'-"','
! r,1'l;(,""j+1
J"'~~" ~ ~.
t'1~t.~t." ~ ,.r':"' ~>
;~~~ ~\~:;(;: :~t~~:(:l
rl'~~~~1f >'4
~... ~"fr.;'1-~ '. ':~ ,
'"'h''' ;.>,;; or.'.'
f ~~\g1.8~l;;! }~(di!
. m'i:llc """'" ~',::,:;;,
Il~~!~il~ r~-i\f~-~ ~~L'"Ulrh) lA\r1~~; r:\~lf.;Yo)
J,~...._) ~ Li (~J L}..Jc ,_ ":'JL.':V Lr"'UU 1.-'_ ._-1 I1vu ~-,-,I :::; .
The evolution of the Ea;st
Park neighborhoodw~~
developed into a su~-area .
plan map. This map divide~ "
the neight>orhoc>d into .....~
different zones, Eachwitb~ "',
different desig~ s~andards.; ,
for; home type; :b,Liilclirig:: .
height, seto'acks,allowaole
uses, required op~r space;',
road de~ignation; park arid, .
conservation Idcations ," .
(See development ..'
standards section).
ec
ccr
r~lQ
'" '/ \ loWClehsity
~ .' .-;. ;::',1' ilr~~.:. 7.0 acr,es,~pproxjmat~ly
~ max~m~~ den~lty: 12 dua _
1~~~,=}mediUm density, '..
... .~.(.:'i~ :';';.:., ar~a: .13.-44 ~o:es ,a. PP.'r9Xima~eIY
~ '" .~..: .' fnaxim.u~?ensity: 25 dua
~igh den~lty' . '. .
. area: '9'.02 acres approximately
:~aximu,!, density: 5~?ua.
.. '.' ,. mixed use . .;.
area: 4.4.i'at(es approx!mately
'. .~.... . :::,:::~:S\ty:~Odu;a .
. . .. :.ar;,a:13:'0 acres.a~proximately ..
s::
--
s::
s::
(U
-
a..
(I)
>
--
(I)
s::
(I)
..s::
(I)
~
c.
E
o
u
maximum allowable density means the number of dwell.
ings per net acres stated by the zoning code
-. -, ~- --- - .. - - .. -. . - .- --~. . - --.--.-.--- - . . - -' ...~ ."--- - - - . --- --_.....-... . - -. --.------.
. .
. .
,: c~:~ !~ <:~~,.; _.i.~ i:~_:' '_~~i~~:_, ~, :,,~ ___ _ m___ _ --.J -39'
..,,..--....:---~
... -;,--:-~"" ...., ~- .......'
,....'\.,It. '_'
',_~~ 1
,i$fIT~f~~:1~:
I~",'~'i ~'6-l-;:...\~~~1
~lrt~J t~''. T
~~~;;,y~ ~'
"('~"r.:1t" ""'
tf:~~~i'-1hE~;K/
c
CD
<
CD
-
o
"'C
3
(1)
::s
r+
V)
r+
D,)
~
0..
f>>
-c
Q.
en
fl I"r:\r R.n.....,
i; fQ\tv;r; I UA~f(]l~Ul f1 ~'7'
D'::)\:" L. '-~~ ,--,U UeJ 10;
'.'
Low Density
The Sub-Are~~ Plan incorporates approximately 7
acres of lart(J.t<:t~signated low density single family.
The densitY in this area will be a maximum Of12
duaand will include primarily larger single family
homes. ,', ',,,
Allowable Uses
Detached single-family residences
~C'~"! ~~'-;'i:.,.',~:'
,- , . .--- - . ~- -- ..- - .--- R____ . -..-...-- _ __ -. . .__ __ ___ _ . ____._. , .. __._ __.~ __. . .__ ___ _ _ _ ._._ h_ _ __~. . ..
; .~.: . ,: .' . :
: : .:' .~"" '..:'". " , . ' ~1 !
I_.~..--- ~'l . : '. ": .~.~:~~. iN.Jr" ~ ~~. .~. i .~~~ .J~..~':~ ~,.~~r~~' .: ~.~.~." I I
42 . '.:; -:~,,' .t.... ~~.: .~~~. d.li'".........t ..:.~'(l'.~.: .:1' M, \.. I,
L___.. __ ._~__.. _ _..__ .___.~ _______ _ __"_" .___ ______ . _ _ ..__ __.__._ _.. _ __._ _ "_' _______ _ ':"":. "-__'-:'.-:'___.___ __ _ _ _ ._ _.~_..__~
n
I Lro'~'!\,,7
~,_.J\~\J
r-"" e'L
: nUX\~v~,~l(~lrJ1i :.;,,>> \; '7
~ ' ~ 1 ! It"'. i" I
',--~ "-"---- -_/ '--'..../
i1~~~~~~
;~.....':; itr.,~. . \/-f 1-:' I
k~~j ~~~i~~1r~
,):,"," P,', "';"'
~~~
Traditional Single Family lot
M~.,15'~EAf' y~ -
SETBACK AT DEvaCIPMENT
'IlOliHDARJES:10'~
y UlN. ssTReEt
~
MlN.%=
(5'~~EH
SlDElOADEDGA/W>Er
,stReET
V)
-c
L..
cu
""C
s::
<<$
..p!
V)
+6
s:::
QJ
E
c..
o
W
>
Q)
C
~;W~f1Jt\
.y:.Jj;,'-'~'
~~:~
Od25)~\V7
_.~ 0
i n ~r":1 r:)rf~""
L~dA~ullt0u lS~/
Traditional Single Family Lot-
Side Load Garage
STREET
c
(1)
<
(D
-
o
'"C
3
(D
:s
f'+
(I)
f""t'
S>>
::s
Q..
Do)
a..
U)
n.l~ f'] r)
1,\ :--'r:}....F' FV"';:J
l}JU(~gj OlilllflfU
[p)wJ~UUw
~~'f~~P~'~
~' ;J.~. " ~ -'..:. ~"'P~'~
~.;'~~,t J(j r~'/~
.....' lc~.:;",\")l'li:!
f~~
!:f~t~~~q"~l
r~~~~.L_~jE
The Sub-Area Plan incorporates appr<;>ximately 14
acres of land designated medium density single
family. T~~qensity in this area will be a maximum
of25 duaahCfwill include primarily cor,npatible unit
types ranging from smaller single family homes to
mid-size sin.gl,e family homes.
(I)
-e
m
""C
C
ns
....
V)
....
s::
C1J
E
0..
o
Qj
>
Q)
o
Allowable Uses
Detached single-family residences
Accessory,d_w~lling units
Cluster devel~pments '
Carriage units
tfl~~ct5:F::- :-~7,f
"'-7 --ro..'~~t
t;:;t?~"t~~;~~1f
, ;,.,J ~4"" ~-"Jr'
~ei~
r' "
r~\j~ ~o IVo' iln [j7Ur11
uvu '_'~''--'-! ~ ! U
~-~ O"k
11"""1 :: \rr;l<~lu'~ r VI
L':::: dU U~ j Ill;> <I
Single Family Alley Lot
STREET
c
(I)
<
tD
-
o
"'0
3
(I)
:s
.....
(,1
.....
A)
::s
c...
D.l
a.
en
F:i,f~ii~~~~~~~~aJ.i,~;~~~~t~~;[U), ;\~~:~lli;t~;;~5f~e'~'~~t~~!~' \ "~'~~f; :~ad~r~t~~:~I,'~t~:~a.~r~~~~;_~
b~1~'i~r~~~~iit:Z;;~~~iil~J;~>:, :;~itr~J~}~:;;i~~<~i~o'sq,~ft:<V/ ",:': ,'" t.;; ~'~.: . . . "'-;i:/ ~-
['( .fr;:;~rr.{verage firii~~~~ ~r;tJ~;to:'~', " 1~iiri{rh~;t;';i~t?~idth .~'J<l": .,: ..' '1: ,:.,/ ;' .
"~'.''t-'oi~~:'? '" 1 ....1-<"I';~.....1 J~~<>; '\"~\i-r;"..~._... ,t~.-z..j""~'" "e.,it ..:... ..,....J.~. ..
F~YlT!ag~:!09.fh:~ight~l~~.':' ,_ '. ,;' .".:.) ~'rnV!."l'!U.!l1;1!>t;~ept~ ;,~O ~:~: j :; ,:>,' J.'.'..,
b "II..J.a~I"-"'-"),,' , ~... <,O'/: of t... 1,~~,,~_ 'i,"'<<~T, X....''l(,.ft ~ 1'\' P", l ,~.1 ,
I) YI umg coverage,- '70/0 ,."," ,0l1!en spaGe- 300 sq, ., . ~, < ,,', "''>oil'' ",' .,. .
l""':t.,.rf~""--'" ~>t d -... )'".,. '1;;; f',' ''''~f 'li" ~~::<, .~... ~ ~ ~~"'\<'"".~ ~ I 'l,. '" rA --.. ".... - _'\-,....~ !;f
'; ~d~vtilopmenrGoveri'g~ '175 % ~' "'y ~.str&t\setD'acF4! mfn~m'i:l/':n',~ ':~.~ ::,~:: :'<~:~' 1~<':',.' .,,' ;,:-' " \
r.'t<.t..l!:d""."i-4".~(::1't' 0 '~t s:.....,.il '.-'p.~""~'f-L.tb.:1~k~""')J/'1"-:l''''''_1 -'~"!fo1"~ :t~i-'l'i::.t~\ "~'J--J'" r~.~;':_'~-~h~1
;~~; -\~.c)(.<: :;- ;, ,~.,:,.' ~_r~<!rset ac.-"o:'.mmlmUrn'a.t,,",~',~'t<,;. ,~",:. :~'>'\ .', ,;"::,,;
~<..,.i:,t,f, ;. f~' ",'''' :f't".' ~'" luiJ ",,'Il .... ~-d' -"<;:':. v......;::~ -'~ ~".., 'J~ :..""\~.- . rtf,_' ,~"~ '-;'. 'k
i:, .':; '., '. .... ..", '.'1'" "': " , ",,,,~\,,,,,..~,' ~.a eyan 4l'rl:1Ir.lImCHtl to'garage. ' " <.." , "',,' ~.' " '." .,e" l ~,'
I' . ' ! ~~~~:~.;.,.;-. [,,. ~:; ; Z; t\: '~.:'r"'- I f- " ~e'""c-:.~~~,,. 'I, ;'-'-clJi:1 ~ ~<$:\,' 'l~...;~.$" l' ~, '.-'"'.. -"< ,.}": "..~ '} \, \;', t: l > ~:. :r <' tit; ;.~...
':' ...?~ ;~n ~ .)'., ,,', ~'..." ", .
to, ",,1''1' ~~ ...... -J' ~ ). t Itl ~~J;,,'oor $~~ _ .,,"; "~"'" ,~)I. 'h.. >-~, ~.... >\:;~l"",I" \.'1..~;,. "4" ......"j(, .
..:tl'/'f I~"'''''''''''') '~.' -, '~-r<;"-;;;'1\ ~ "i:' 't".1 ~ *1:" (; ~!<' "."1 ~ ,.>;- "<.1':;- ..\~ '. ~,"-' I'\. 1~ .. ~I'j' -U~~. 1'~,
t.,: --..j .J t<"''-. ,,',,"I' '" I",,, ~'~""'r ~'~JJ.,- ~ ~ 'i:1;~~ ~"'_.:;J;r ~b' ~I.!~"' ~-~......,..". .., ~ !t:~4 ".( ;;>r.." ~, ,\~" -,..if "e' ~ ' ,
I', r' ,.".~" , . (c' ..... ., - ~ .~. " '.' .Slue Soc. acll. ~ 4. 'll;lIr.llmum. 'c .~ . " I. " ,. < : if""':'> 'f '.~ "".', :.
. .; "j<~"',~''1i/;~ ~ ".'~ ~~~~~, :,L-~..~{ }~~'~'J "'" ?~~ .:;..,: I~.\~ ",:E .,..."<!'<t<".-t"ln.&<: "'~~~~J,~~ "'~ ~-1 ..} r-~~~''f ~ ~~.~,,, ~"\',; :::'~~~\''''~.~ 1-et ~ ~': .,~
f' " , (. - t" '" "~,'. ",ii:, ~ ~l"pa"Kmg_ 2,'sta s'i'" d '.. ",,)u~., _" ~ 1 ", ".j
~~ ,i "L;l:,t;:~:~; i,.'~~#'n ~, .. ~;;'~~w:;, 'Y~~? ~~,:~ ,.'.~ ~ ~ '~~,; ~ r!: ,,; _ r-;~ n.~:;:;~ ~ J ~ T '"~~'~~ ~~~ ~;:. ~ :'" ~J~ ,~, )..~ ~ ~;,' :~ _t i ~ P f(f{' rT ~"' ,. "{
...:
,-. .p:1~,ii~:.':.cp::Jl.j~ ~-~oi..P'r!,Jt"~~hl<'{\;;~~"~~'?i<;."'l'... ~;J;.._'!; uw....(,.l.....~'w "I'::}~ ''"\..nl- '~'~_~~"'...o."I.~'~.".~'..t." '7"t,,-.,,~fJ<_:it~.-..I..':t'J+r-':!":;~~..I11?
ll<fT,:~~,:,:,--,,l::i:..} ,
,,::. '),~;:~"~~~ k~l~-~*'~-.c~UL~t;-~ ~j~:;;,~r-'i'iii~'::~~~"S~~>t;. ~:~"~ ~~~~~.l-~~ :~'1=~:r2~~!::~~:]h~~E~~:~7,L~~;:':' .. ":f'.-'
: .--..-...- _"___R _____ ._~_.,_ . ___________, ,____ _,,_______ _ "......_____._. ._~_.. ~ ,... .0 _ __'_0 . . __ _ ____. .__ __._ _ _ _.. __._.
, .
: : -- .-,..! : . ....~.' '.': }, f' .: -,>,' . .~: ~ i' if....: iv... .:' ,<'~ .:~, 'C" ,; j~. ,~. :
46 · ' ,'. ~ ,~~ 'f~, """,If ...~"~ ~, f.' .. . ". ,<' t':' . ,
: R .... _..___ _ _ __,,___ ~_._________ __ ___n______ __, _ _ _:A~_ _.__...~ _." '.ii :~ :.__....~.___~~.. ,,_ '. ~_____ __._.____,...-
iJt:~~~~f~]~
IJ.. "" .' ..! " "1~'
l \:' .J ~;~~-'~~:/ -1~,;
ir ~~)t ~.:.c'$ ~_: '-II\!
f:~~d;;~U
~J;ii;S"S:l:~:c;~~;:~
: ?jt'~:'i.~(<j:tJ~:,:~~ ~~. i
P~':;~'iO.:"",":6i
.... r-'O'
f 1':- . I r' r:;;y--
~U~rQ II (1u UlllJ
r-. ,",
~D~ ~\r-r\(-,~nI\i7
' d. r1 I - "<1 L \ '
. :..: Llt:'./ \...) l-
Single Family lot with Basement Garage
MIN.S' FRoNTYARD
SETBACK
L..~;Vt:'s~~~Xt;~.~-,~,.' :';~~-:07~~~~,;, :,<~i~!;'-, ::\,:;
r~"..,,;.\'/gl,!\JQI!ng'Jmf?~i':- ' '~<i' ~A.9t'r~I:~U.l'r~rnents '"
1~<:lt'ijaJJt~:;~~~;;~i~~:~1;~~~~\f~-:~j';~i~f~~~~t(~~:~i~~~.i.;6~'~R':'~?"";~
1..,: ~ff,o rh~a':Je';;a ge. ,f] ri i 5 hed'gr.ad ~~t6 '?; ,,' . mini !i1~ in;lof:wi(ft~ ".3'4'< . 'r.~l:~ ~:. .
t)' .~ /~':.~; '",~l . '".> ~: ':--. ^.,.../.->:('Yl', ;:-:~,,'~'" ,,-, ~ >:-.~?), --;"V :), {j 'r_';.~~:,:;'i:r ,~h~:':Q_;'... '.',_...~J"j ...~,~; ~: ....-,; ,I;, ' . '" '.~. ,"r"
;;
. .... rav~~r~g€; rpp:f;ll~!~~t.,~..' t d~,,:..;:.,. :;~:IT;I,!!1I.r,n~!:!1~!?,t.gE5P~lb ~9 ( (. ,.'~"..
, ".' \<~; -'-I::..J- -.... j.,f". .'-':' .h" ,.' .'\ '''-\:0/'' '~'.:r' " . r;l ~ '''~ ....;..~. ..J -tb' :D._'(J:~ :': .."..t,,~' . ('. "'~~> '. -~...)l'. i ':':
':c' .'IJ.~I, u!llg'c9v~r~6~l.:, ],0,:/0 ,.j:' '.',': "~Lrp:::L>S~. ,a,qK:..-:~ !J:lIQIr:n,U,rr:k '."
.', " -,. "l.,'1 ~ i., : \; ,.....' ~ r-, \.." , -i. "'-."~' ~ ~~,- >:'. \!-f , . \.' _"":. " 1- . ,',~ 10;.4.'.. ' - ,~" ~
j'; ,'development coverage,":7S%''':' (;; ::'side'setbacK' ;:4:~irj'jrilmurii.~';;;~:': :,';
U~ r.t,~?;(:~!'{/~,[; ,:;':.:.,::~I;',r::;~:~+.;? ~:~; ~~~~:~~~~{~,:?'R;::h1'.iB.~~~~.=~~)~~ '.1
t" ,. "I""~' .,.1, ., 'f', ,'" . ~ X,c.,',' c.,", ~C!,lleY'ar:1i:l'4.".t0'garage,aoor.,' ,"',.'
Il~}II!_;~~~II~~~i~1il~~;~;f;T~!~Z:,~;~'
(I)
-0
J..
(Q
""C
s::
(U
+d
CI)
....,
s::
co
E
Q..
o
-
<IJ
>
(I)
C
_ . _~ _ ~ .R_ R . .... ._ R _ __ _ ~ .. _....' _.. .~_ _.. . . __ _ _ __.___ ___ ___ _._ ____ __ ____ ____ _________ ____ ____ ._._________ _ . _._
: . .. ~,,, ':'. '- . ~: . .
. ,> ."
,:~~ ..,...": 'l\ >If' n~'~ Y'. .~,~:, '1I~--- ..'~ ~"" i~ ... \ .'. ~':"._:! ,
. .f .~.....'t.. ~':" .....,fI.....'.. ...",kil'.. '. . " '. ---.---. .-:
. " ,.....- (a, '" ;Ii'..:<~w.l.f..':-- ';:j' '~bk.' ,.:0......;' l : .. ' , , 47
;.00...... . ":4"~'~"'" ~ ... "'""'" ........ ,... "'.!.:.;. If!., ~. ~, ;i; .~ ' >- . .
- .- -.-....- ,~ .~~- .. ...- _: . .:~_._.._- ...- :'~:._~- ~ .-':::. -'" :"--_.._-- -.. .. ...::..... '::,~' ...---.---.-.-.:= . -. - -- ------ ------.-. .. ._---_._----~--- - - -----~~
~!~?~~i~~l
rf-';F''')~('' '~"',>
~~~r'~' ~
c
CD
<
!P-
O
-0
3
(j)
:s
""
V)
r+
DJ
~
0..
A)
a
(I)
rM~ ~'J
." ..j ~~ru~f'l'-v-.
.~. ~O'! ('I
U lAJ@ IJL.U III. j lJ
r'-' ("\
I D XiJf~fll0Zn;'[\V7
- <::,L C,./U0.o
Cluster Development Lot
M1N 15' BUILDING
SEPERATION ON
FACADE WI PATIO OR
PRINCIPAl..
ENTRANCE
MIN. 5' STREET
SETBACK
MIN. 5' FRONT YARD
SETBACK
'4 ~,f ~~','_'- ;":'~:7~-':~::":~'~/~~~~-\/;~'"'t
; ~ad<iiW0~ri ~('sia ri 8~:r(fs' ,.,\,0'1'
..: :'.:' '- 1..:: ~~ .'~'d" ~\ ~~.:" '~-~; ',I' ~:~. ~n':;:~~:'
tr''?':.:,~,:,-~ ~~ :;: ~~',:7\~:, ":;,r:~;r;~~::, ,,,~...~ ~T~_:. ~.~ <~, ~ ',' ._~ 2~ .,: :'~~ " ;;~~_~ ~:; ,;:" '~.':~,~' '" . ;..,'.: ie''';F' ~,~ ~ n
rji'~('~~~~'~bdiJElrr'ig:rrfas:s . f'i.'""-""" ....'/'1~~ilot;!reqLiiremei:tts:
,: ~'it;)~'1.::t*,i ~t::.~?'~.,,-~ '''';~11..~f..~~~~ '<~;t.<~~.1.::. :~ .:~: ' .,'~;~: ~" -.'({~}.,~l :':: ~: ",7'.<, : .ll_...~:
F" 7..r'1':;:l~;;'i.-:'l.'~'~:~ ...,>:::-Y0":~~'4';t;,. -, .,,'~ ,.~..,- ,,~-'t..'<" :;~t';:,t~'~".':"."Ir~",>; - .-,', ~: y,-'t,""' , >>'; f'
::'c ~I)Mfainfheigl'it,f3"5j~mOe~'s'hrecr:~ ~ ',hfliihl'o'Ji:lbt: SiZ~:!'170d'sq;ft>;:;: ~"
;..~" .,~.~:i" :,t'-\'>..~~ ':_ -<'l<~~,r d. 'r~",..J' ~..'~~ ,',," '"_,, ,",-; ;:;...'. .:,:;<'~:.., '~~',:r:, ~/.-':.' ' '~-'j".', '~? ~'~ "
'.i;, Ji:qr:n,;C!v~rag~ fit'l,~f;i~a;g{C!d~;to;;'}\ '11'!,II'WnJ,HTl,IQt;\V!dth;-34' .,.' .
.... ~~~ilf&gjf;gbf:h~j~ffif)~i>V::<" , ~~{9>Tt,ij~~;i?:t:~~Rtl1it 5cn:';;;~,:j.:"
,'( "l)tiiltling'cmv.e'rige.<7o%" ":"';,,,str~t setl:iac!,,: S' imii:1irriulT;1i-" c::~l'
t !.; \-' :~ \''11''1, '~,,~, ":~:~~," ::,..: ~~' ,,- ~1 ~;.' ~IJ..~ ': *"" ',r ;~' ,:-,' ~< ,~,.:, (. _ ~';'" ': ~ '1..~~ ~:'" ~~ "-. :: ~ ,.' '.,:~: t .'is. ;..r:,," 'r- . ~~\', :
, , , ~',.!. ",
-;:~4cr~~!QPii"~f1t,tZ~~(~...~g}~:;Z5:%'j; '. "s!<!e,'~e~~.~qk:"41Jl11r:l}rD!J.rm~>~:;.-'" ) . . \ ~,.
..~,:. \;:f '.. ,en > ;.. \'., ,~~. \".,,;'':' .:' ~," ",reai:;s~tba"ck;~4'~"riiiriimumf_~ ~;;'< ~, . > ,,;
I ~ ~!l,,,,,,,,~......, ~ '.- ,;J...:,~~ ,..... "':: II _}.~ J \,...,~ >;.+;.- <: _ _I,' ~"1,.1<i'{tf' '-""J
, , . " f<. .."..... .' "..~ ..<0 I ,.ft'" I 't' ," ~ 1
f \.',,-'.:: ,", '. ,; "..;..' ~,;;;'" ... : open'space - 200 sq- ;on, 0 ,: . 'i.,'
r;\ )_,!~:::";,l <1 \"'1" -), \ ~ ..\<........ -,'~ ..~.~' :~' ;r:::{; ~,~ ~>~ :0,"" ~"~-:';'~"'~.:"< ~";."l
"t1'); >"""-~\;'R.O-'..;'f~,,;,/"':"Ij...,; \ ~~1 ,~and'or"commOt:lgreen -I'~ J ~~;: ~ ~
j "1>,>: ~;f-', .... , .,'" 1.:1 . "",/,,,,-. ~ '" I~:;'~l'...;f,r.l"':.-;..a. ~'I'I...c>.t.,. !..._-,\ ~r; '''''.1 r ,"1".\ ~ ",I
';orl'",._.~ , I,'. -'00 .'~". ',' ~;~" " ~"t"Rarl<,"g-one'off'streetspa(;eno. ",;,~
k 1 T ~ ~)~~..---~.... '~, /'" t ,_ ~ ~ ~ .' ~ ~<"'..,y; '.:l !,J....~,..., 'e,. _"'~"!-' ...;:~i' J [...~ " tJ=:". ,-;, ~' ";t. ,:1
lr",'>>/,>:':, ,',~, ..~..;et"":7;~. " ,"~!J1PJ~.than15q':frQm..th~e'aWell-t,... " ..:;;:1
fl' ~'"'''J: " .''',,, ~" ''''. .''''-''' ..'-'.'. ',' , ~J.""'''' ~,,' .". ,i
: '.'~, ' . " . ,i'j,;::,{".~","" (" , 't!" "g"if ser.ves'" '" .' <:'*', ":'" , ..~
~"~C'.\"l' ff"h" ."......./' .:,t.',. .,,:,,.J,.)D ,~_.i.') >'j.:.., 'h~,~;;,.. ,., '.~~
!:~ i:A~~.r\:' :?!2i;~~~~:;JDiY:::;~:~,~.X<':~,;r~.~~:~;{~:~~;f;i1;::,: ,~ ,:~~,i':~ ~.:-
/1. ~ "'-r..".r-/ '~"'" 1~~. ~ ~r:/,.'J.~"'- .:r.Y"'Jf{~ "j-",\"~..':' 1~' if. .....~q. ~, "f" I f- - ~~ Ii ~{' ~ 'LJ~' "" T '\~ "' ':' ~.i .~ gr~ - . _ J - ~ T1 ",,' '"
l"I,...~>t~'" ~ 'L \, ~...i'~"-.ir'l" ~ ~ ("."" ~.,~ "..'~ ~~-.:..,....."..";r ',."~~-' r~;-';l-'f'~] ",.~~ ",.'~""""r)'+ .0; ,"" -', ""~"'~..'"' ~...!' t" ~-.'
"<;L'~!f~,iR t- \~\ ~1"'':';N''OO'- ~~_,"\,.,. ~""'~'!l"l ;-,:rf1'!':f'~~",?,t.j.~.., .....,,{>/'~.~"'....f!.<?;;.'\I~....">-f~,'>I''!.' ",," "'~"''''i- ' ~1~~-iL'l!'~'''' -J..'~.i.-~~
> ~", ,::_:",~~..:~h:j;,....,.ai.~...:..s~~....",~........L~.",~~..~~.'::~_,__......~__...';................;G_...........__~____~_" ,~"...
:.. -.....--~~ .. - ---.- .--~. - - - --- -- -.- ------..- -,.- ---. -----_.- ..-. - ._- .---:.:--..- --- - .. -.:-.:--- -- -- "- ------ ----- - . - ----.,. "
I . . . ~~ ~ j
: ; '. / .~,... ~ ~ ".' . ~"~::~' ...., ; .' ~ ~ '~. 6'"" '~;-'\ r~ . i
.. ... .. ... . . , j '1 . t\.. J ~ ~;, l't, /" -~ .."',.'.r'~ .... C,.." .
. " . ,,(0 !f'~" .'. !':' ..W,'"'...~ :,d '... . . I
48 I' ...~ ., " ~:~ ~i '.' '~J""~ .ll',-;' ."a~'.. ': 1t~,:.~ 1" l~ :('.,~t.4" . I
;.....__._.. . .._____. ___00,. ________ ............. ._'..~..,:__~_....-,:...,," _.__._--'";",,,_: ...._-'...... _._..____. ....___I
[1 r 0 111 IT"'" ,,)
L...J i '(';::':. '" t~\ ,....., " f-;;:;>Xfl
r-J Dt~ (lj L~X~ru~)lHW
, : ,,,,,...Ji.','J ,,', ~"
~ '.~~~~ ~1~)~~< ~
H igh!R~IiSity
The Sub-Area Plan incorporates approximately 10
acres of land designated high density single family
density. The density in this land use designation
will be a maximum of 50 dua and will allow for
a variety cfRtc.ompatible unit types ranging from
carriage units to townhomes and residences with
live/work ~apabilities.
~.'"
Allowable Uses
Detached single-family residences
Aq:;~s~oty dY'elling units
Cluster developments
Carriage units
Attached single-family residences'
Live/work units
t:::-5--::~;r;;;G
,1-,. -----..,'.-Ji'.,) I
'h' , f,o" ~":':,
Ir~.\,r ,!,,,;. :0,,:,'-1,:
I;~:;" f''',':,J>:';;1
i:1",J "'~ 'I .,~'
n~[~..~r~i;i~~,]
r:;~-Y':' ~..,.,;
h;:;t;~jf, , ~~
11.tJ . .
,f..~il;_" '~.L;'..'"
t:o:"..n.:.--:.,.._"~~l--tt
(I)
"'C
b
c:u
"'C
s::
cu
.....
en
.....
s::
QJ
E
Q.
o
-
QJ
>
CI)
o
- ~ .-.. -. . -- - -' . -..- ~'. . ----- - -..-- ......- -.- - - ----- .. - - .-- .- ..... -. ----.-----------_.._--
. " ,,'
I . { . . ~ i!)
t", .1.......
. ..
, -
:.1 , . ", .' ',~:; :~~~~.i ~~;; ~,t:- <:' ~ - -; ~ - .':-';i~!~ . :~:-: i.~~' ", ; ~. '-, .: ,. - ------..-.
...."". ,.. .. , ,.~:,.. to'" - .-. ~.." ~. k ~ ' ' 49
'w_.--. . _ .__" __.~. ~.ot;.~:::~.-:,_ ~ _.;:~~-~.__._~~. ___ _..._____~~_~_:.:.... __ ~~_.._._.M_ ___ ._ ___.._______ .~.._ _.__.___ __ _ _~ __ _ 3
~~T~16~J~
" ,', 1 r".~, '''':/
,ilifi:,L~~~ JtJb
~t~,:,
I.~'.~
q.3
o
CD
<
!!l
o
"'C
3
(1)
:s
f'+
(I)
f'+
S>>
~
c..
S>>
-c
Q,.
en
("j~1
[1Jl nr;:; , 1--,
I.JlJ ut~ rlJ
\..-.-.
,-.... Of'
I D ~f(1;(,,:)n, !:\V7
L_--, ,5L1 ue)Ub",,/
Single Family Lot with Carriage Garage
.. )11IN..fREAR
YARD smAcK OR
'D'IFAfr~a:i
ft,~;>',.~.,,< ~J:)lllilairrfm~s"':~ .'.<:: ~<~:; ,:' " lat re~uiremeht~~~-::%'~ ;'~adtJifi()n~Lst~~<fc1'ti:i~
f::..:~ ~~~F;;.I'~""~~1.:.~'~1~"''-.~'','''t.1:'l.~,,"~,''J.-~~,_,....'I_~......?' .:!:~.:"'L~~ ~ . -- ~'<~}. ~?-: 1.~' ....--._"'~"~:'I.~.\~):..,.."-;I -",,~,' -.":'\~:-\i,,"",:'\,-'./..."
,ir"~ l~/i<~,.j,;J-,"":~.)1 '.,_,;::t.;;.n.lf:":<I~'\~r.~~1::J~" ~"'-ltl",., ,.~.~.. I ~~:' ~4 ~ ,t-.. ~ . ~\I :'lir':_~':', ::'
.;' ~JeJ'~~~tpl/ot: :;, .'..'\ "",," .,.' ,,'.resld~nt!allot .; ( , ,: '~~', ''''. ' ';: ;.
;, :; :bulldirlg ,height ~ 3s'~m'easured' , ' :niinimu~'lotsize.- 2,500 sq.ft ~ :
, I-J ,,~)I ~,t"'~~... \ <r~:;'~':..[ ~r ... '1"j)"'~" ,~ <~,,~ ~',,_ ~, . 1 '. . ~ ~~ 1:~. ~, ,..;;r-..;:
i"'" frbr'n'average;;TInisne"d'grade ,tditiinimt:im;,ldt. width." w6!...., -> . " /.!
~ ~ ''''~."o; ~ l~~ \<, "')~ I - ~':"'.- "w,-,," "',' .--, ~"r.. "$'~ _ '
~;"{ aV~f~g~'~.oof'ne!g~r ',,~:} :~: ;', ;rr.hli,m}iI:Q:,19t:~~pth'':~5,?~~\~>t:';~j '. .'
:: ~: bt.iJI~J~g ~~V~~~!![ ;:"i5~; '-,' ;,~ :S1:r~~~~~~~F~}\5' rrJii1in:1,~f11,;.;".~ .,.,,: ~,
i~ji ~i~i~t~~~{~f;:;.. "; .~~I;~~1;~:O~i1~;'~1{;j ~....
f(~ b~ildifigtihEiigfit0'3~Jh!ri~~;fur~d: '" 'parkiffg':2rsfali's ~<';,;;O,,\;.~,V, ;
!:;~ ,~~&,~y:~M~e,~~~JAh~{~j&ta,~~~~~;:J; ';: i ~~P~~~~~~i~r;~~~:sq:>ft ':~~~~;,:;~,~) ".
,~, r av~r!ilgeIoo~l~eJgnt 't. oJ.",',.., ,- car;page49,t,.,;. ~"''''''''~' ,\.' " :,. ."
r~:~:: 'ji~irdjng:~1~E!r~&~~:i~%<):,c:: <-;;;i~in~i~!.i1i~;19t~1~k.f'~~'~,s~ft,:.: ,,,, i ,'/1" '
I '; a~eiOpmentrc\Ver.igE;:: goo/cL....:;.\.; hTiinil'rium?iOt\}.tidth -"..32:;, ;' ";~ . '
-4;~rjo ",""~~...u-"\.r(Jj"',..,..~;,.,..."i~>. " ~;"..'; '1."';.~::\' ol+~~'t~"~",..."';;.} ,~)~;<'"
,'.' {.",~ .,,,;: ";':",'-'" ;, ~/...'.~' ',mmlmutrdotClepth-"28'..,.",
*1 t'''-'1''''~ r ~r .:..~i .~~~_. ;-, 'Pf~r. ,.~ 'i~ 1 . "' ";>" ...-' H~' i ........ %~.., !1- .,"'f>"...+' "~
,~~:v,:;..~. ":":"'{', ", :":';': ~:~.:<~. 4 ~~eetsetb'ac.k.-,s',min',":~' r '"
. .'~:::"~J"~<~N !" '1..l.\1c.j"'~i'-",,~"'7" ::0. t<. ,1.;.I7....,";ot..:,....t~ j.'"~-,'" .~. ~ "~'I\ ~', qj....J
':"'\i c>"~ f7,'..' ~'3.w, l'.:(.,.', ; .,-:v 11: , Slye setb~q!C,::'4. ,r;rllnI mlH;11;QCO ~
~ '(,' ,;,"jf-"l., ,. c..'r)..-,JI.. ~'..,,: ~ I'" :r'~11~1,.... t~' "" .):-< ~t~ /~f:' -<l /-~ ',-:' <",~ ,~'......: .~l "'.,
IJ:'1i~<L ~-".tt~~"u ~ .,.....tf~/t-~o.l!.t : ~~ A'~,-,~'l,..., '. 'ItattacP.led~'I~ /. -.(" . ~~Jt 1 '.... ~:1.
c"7::i-t'q~rt;: \ ..)';.:.~.'t;j "'~\J',.~.,t4.~''"';:;.f 1'V\1.<": n ~1";~... (.... ~;I . :_~.-, ""b~.:'''q,'
!" "~,~ ~';''';"~:~;''''A/,tl.".: .:"',," ll, p" )rearsetl)acli'-,n:,'r:i1ll1lmUt.n t01>", ~J
i:.1.~."1'h1:"""\ ;-i-'~~~~,~ .., ;~...~';..t;.:'-""<l- :~"--."J';;})~"'7 "'~7~t.;.>f;{"1 . ~"... :1.'\f:,'<o';"..e:'~: 1,/
:-'1 ~~f ~;- ,,~ : "::1 ,.,' ,<, i.";", :-. r .;::. -t: '" ~~ C!lIey arad 4'~o. g!ilrag~'dooJ'~/''''' ;:"~ .;~
.""t ~...-; i:(,~..~:ti ... ~"".,.~~,""\ ~~~. {"~'. 1~~,\\,';t ~...'..'~-<.~ ..., ~ ',...... ...~<1 ~ -,~
':..: "".:f~' ;i._ .~r~t t t,,'1'''' -/ ~ 'i':' .f, :... ?-r;, -~'). ~'>;.~r ~ 111. ,"'Jpay,klng..:.,.. stalL.. ~.sf ~: ....fi\."C',.It ~, : -'t~'"!(:l:, ';
/";:1;,-~....~1",J,r"':~ ..;.... ~ f .t.>.>;1.,o~.n:.:-"~"'I'1.~~',;.....,:~~~.e~1 L~r",~"'lrr'.h['-'r-<t"~i' ~~
:" ~ ;+;f,,;. 'j "i':', r.~~<l'. '" ,;\t: ~ '.',:' )\"1, ,'" :~open:sp~~e,.: 0 ~q ft. ~~: . :"",fi ~:~I:;t;L
J~~~) ~1~r,,~~,",.!1-'tj.f'/'~~ i--..\ o'\-<1"'t'~(;.~....r~~ir~"~',\i!:'. /1"':"',\, Jjj",~_I....~:"'l. 1.1>'; "~7'r",'-~""'1:-
~.~~~:.;;~:;.~,.:::':~ ~~~~:~t:S~ ?~:. ?;~. ;;1; ?:~\~ "~;,: :~~~~:~;~:~~ ~~~~:',::'~~~1:i.;;t~t,: ~ 1:'" '1'"; .:;s.,.b:~~~~ "~";.c;:;..
" . _nn~.~_. .... ... _n_~'~::~~l.::~.~:n~...~~.:~,. n '-:
'nn" " ,- , . ' ~ I" ~ ' " Ii'''' ~,~ .... ',""",,, ~ " , . !
50 . :' , ..': . ii" > ..' ...., !J'ji.,'~ }?' . ,~.~. ':.~' -';'. '7! " ,'" ',.i ., " :
, .' ~~, ,"" '''",.''''''':;t;.f f!: 11.;5;' """., '," : ,,''''. ," I
l.:.._.' _ _.~_~ ..._____._._. _.__ ______.__.___.___.._. ._._............_...____,.___.___.__~._ ...~__...::..__.:.______.::..___.._._.____..__.___...~.__~
n nO n
I H-i j 0 ---.-,i ~-
U....,: l(or:(i~
. 'I /....(, I' j
~~ ,t~)r~ ~.~
r [~ri)r1,{i~[fil~7
L:::: ~ ..5U UC,.l vI I
<./
Townhome Lot
ALLEY
STREET
Mlf.t S~YARD
SETBACK .
Mlt.t 10'A'IEW\GE
SEPEBATIQN
BElWEENBUfLDll'JG
GRouPs
~~?;~~~Jf~I~~;")i~i~ ~'~:;~~:';' ~0:; ~-':::'{;:;:J:~' ': "~'~':~I~~;t~ "7~~ '/~;~ ~',~t ~:: ~~~i ~t~~; ~~:::-~?i' ~T;;~~;~:<d~--~~d~~t' \- :'~':;, .;: :11 ~'~~t'\t~i~~:a:~~::.~?~'~'S~o,~:~:,
~:.
h.t,~'>.;,1.';.;'~IJ,.UI 'ufng1maSSf" ,-~ ,. ',0' ..' , + .,,~ 0 ,~r;eqUlrer::nen 51':'" ,{:. ....-..,,',';; a. :1 .IQn:a .5: an arus'~'" i;;
1~t":;I~;~f5:'~,:;~~:;\~.~::;;~:~~:/r:~:~}::'~~ ~ !".,:;{:;~~}.~c.t\ ~ >~ ~,~::.:.,~::~, :~i;/~ :~:5tl\';~i':~~~'~ ~~:v~ :'~'~~'Ki~~ :{~:;:: (;:::~:.t-j"
j(1. ,buildin'g"'heig'l1t ,; "A 0: m~as'ur'ed.. -:', J :ff1i'nimum ,lot~size-:';"l,!'6o:sq' ft,'.< - .'" ". '. .,"~ "':;'.;,' ~, ':;'" ',:.,'
cro' i'" i:-t. ,,~~ , ,'-f, ..,PI' ,. ~ t '~. or... :)~..- TJ _ '" ~ ~ '". ....,t1.-..~ '<.
f'<~'fr,om"av'er1"g'efrnished'g"~acit<t6 ',';',, ri"inimum~lot,{,yidtht20:/' ,p':, ' ':.:c'i:".;~.,"~'~;' ',< ,
~l!:' ~ t" -1~" 1" r - "...(1' l' ~ '...... C> . ,.r~_ "'>. ~ ~ ~i'l..-'"" "" '>j" '"' <
. -,; .aMrage,'r.oo"fb'eig"ht:,., ",;;,~ ~:, T; miriii:r!i.im:'lot.dlilpth ~ 78:> .,~ IJ F.: ~,~' .~,,": 'I
I r N' ,~- .... '0: ... ,..! "" I I ,. '{>:.r~'" ~ 1', ~" ,Il.", ,1/,.>-\ . -,'" " <t.'~
~;~ ~builaing'.c6verage~- :8o%<} ,.' ; ~}; ',Si'~ee.f~s.et'p,aFk. 5: .m i n Ltj]i'.(m~ ~" "..J' ,'(q ::-': ;
I'" ~'.'!;~k'.' ,f' \ .,~':', " e'- "," '\:d'..... I:i ;"I;,'~' ~,~ ." ='t',' .', '~.',\'" '.-:~),c "
,,;(leveloP.J:l1ent<coverage'i.90,% -,,: 'SJ. e set aGI'-,,~"'rr]!nlmUm m,),' ',,', .';..-(i,-'."-'",' .',', '
""'"" ~"!;~;:'<,{ i~~~":r" ~"'::f,,~;; -~ l" ~*~'>:>~~ ~):.:' ~~h" 'd~"'''':; .<t.l~J'~' ^'.; ~:,~~::.<.1r',: :l~'v~ 'fj~~ '!4l ~ ,
'\ ~L~" \; .i-~...;....:pr. .\'1.'~ ". "" ~- I attac e ~ ."j" ;...' 1,..'; r1 '<' "..... ~'~.t:""-T- jf 'f -e \~
-;';J ~!.tl.,'tt,'~;' ,~. ~\'1,^,:\,...!)T~"~'''''~''r1:4 i(~~~~";.::" 1.;"::J,.!\f",,~..._.~. ~ 1;:..~~ ':_ ", "'~"'",,~.:''')>I.'.~ '.~
,"'"o;,,<'~".t; 'l,'?i::t,,,,,'''.',;'~;;''~'"''';I; :,re"ars.etJiaGb'o~r:r.j!1lrol:Jmto"f\ ',';;:J.',,",' ,'>~~t" .
i'r' ~~'~\.r<'U,,.. ~ 'i:{"""'-''J;.j t~l~...t"\.-.f~ t...- r~ ~,~-o1...' ""'--""~i \;;cl 1" ."'.....~...,. ,~ L .ilJ. ~""~<,"'''' ~~"".( ...,,,~ 'I. >
, \ ."\. :", ':;'$..,: . "...1 .. ;" 't ',',' (' 1a'lIe\i ar.1d'4' '~t0 garag'e door''': , . ~,','tl:~"'''' fA .,',.. -' ,'j
. i.l .....?: ~v>.~:t.f o.:j ~ :; ...t. t .:'~ / ~ i 't.,;.~ i ~ o.>--f.~ .....;:.;- A ,.... ..-/~: ,.r."..'r ~ ~ -~r~ r-<'"I~ (: < ~ "" < . .. 0 '<.::~) ,~/:"j 't.'~: ~'~ "~~':'~r ~
;\~-... ;~~'" ...~;,. 'to~.
1,( is ";;::t'" ~ '-T "tF>'f.;,' to lct..~~,; '; 1'....~"lo.~.;... '0 e'n's' a'eel' 2'0-'0"-'" ~ft\ .... "\;'4; ~ ~.;;; 1i~" .'""l.~' 'I". ~~.~...1'."e~ '" - !..~,
,rl: . ;:"'VJ..c o(~ .i-~;~;i*,-"'j"'...~>Jrl~....;":J1 '~P ,..~,..R."...".-,?'"",,,,,, ~~~ ,_(".p~..... "J.-..'C..... "'~"<I:;...f~A.1.- ~~~ ,\tr:",~i~~'= n~~ ~ ;lo"lr oJ1
1;;:',~\,>f;,.~tJ;.~...1..~.t':'f>>~lj-l....-';t"'1;.j<;~,..,~iY'.r~r.. .f7.'...JI'-'." ~'_II~I>. ~,".:'""-I ,:.~""r "<->1; ,~':-." ,,It;<.;..J..,,,,,,,;>: >tl-~~!, ..~~ ,..,"...~< ~~
,\<' ,l......~ k' -"":V--"~i-"~l)\_f',~k....t.?:J>r'l- , , arKln ':"'2?sta S . t, .t:.,~.:~~ , \Rj' .' j' 1'r'-}<...'. .~'~..., "*l.~: ",..
r/ ,}~.k.;:~,;:,,,..."t<J.r:;'~.t~':'''~>.-.::''''',,~ ~J;..)&~:t:Il'4"J~.,~~I1J.~,ij _p..,r_~~~ g~....l""'Ol <~ ~l).,:~' \.,.J-'I>'~ ~~~"""~\_.;+"~ 7 <r .:t.J".._~,,-,,".,,,.>;.?,,,,,"}J->~,:r.1l-,.
:~~';F'.,;'~~\,,-. ..... r:-...-> "1'-< ~
(I- ~~~~~':;'~~~"t::~-;+.,.,~ ..r~'~c l':'W1! .'" -:." t~~7;~~->7 ';'~;:i':'~':~.:'-,f'>.~';~:...'" -.:?~:::"f<:;:~i:~.>~~ ~~J>. ,"~y' J1~"~";G!T"'..~-:~~.:.:r\t~<-~Jf ~\'-l1~~,
i'~~~~~c~~~~~~J
~1>i: ",,]0 r~"~;!
~t:~,~:1 ~~~~i~~~
",o. ,~ U",J.: .,,1F I
!:i ~-,; ~?~:l ,.~~~;'i~'J
l~f~\t~~1
en
-C
:ba,
CU
-a
s::
eel
..,
Vl
~
s::
<I)
E
0..
o
-
<I)
>
<U
(.)
,..-. ~._. ----. -.. -.-, -~_...~.._.._-- --_.___..__________.._._._~____.._...w. _ ~_______._ _.. ._. .__"
, "
. .
: .:"" ,,~ ,~~';.. ~ :~. .' ":'1"(:~~: '~'~~;;:~:~"::'.' ~. .. '.,:.'. ., .;
~. :, ~ ~'~"!i""" i,- '~'i 11I;1 1:: ." ,'}ll ~j ". .. ,'"'' .. . ---,-' .--.
'. ~... <:~ ~ " ..:~_.~.~.._~. .... :~L~' ~!? '.. '~:. ;;~~2.>'~ '~~!kr;::' ':' _ _'_._._~_':' _.:_ n', .___._._..m_ _ _ ",,__._ ___.., _. _. , . 1 51
J~\~~t!~~:1~
IS to. ~.. l.c,,"i,
:~r~~;J *~",;;'~.\~.~B
111\'" I_d.' ;<~"
;l~~;~f$;:~
".,r",<Jl",
;;~~~~r~
[}~OW1D
I D /~lf1J~~1r)YJ
....,./ u ,--lJL~/
Townhome with Basement Garage Lot
MIN. 4~SETBACK TO
GARAGE DOOR
:MIN.10'AVERAGE
~EPERATibN, ."
~ElWEEN BUILDING
GROUPS
c
(D
<
tD
-
o
"'C
3
(D
::s
r+
V)
r+
A)
=-'
0..
OJ
""'C
c..
CI)
t~-'''''''~''''--:~-'''''~~'''~---;;-'"~~ . ..............~I I _....t,4~' ,.,.~. ,- 1 ,...,.J" ~_, _~ ~-~
o i";'::':~':'i'~Du,ilaing:lj1a-ss ,~~,,,', ,'.- ''':L0f"r;e~uJr~meht's. "', ,< '~.;, ;,'aaClhlcirn'atsi:ai;ida'ras,~ . ;;>j
1....1~~~~J.,~:',j ~:F,-~l:<l'<.::...-~~\~.'1~"'-,-,'^'.:: r ~P~<-.::';~\<:~~ 'J"- _ 1>~' , ," ~ ~~"~:~,, ~~".~.:'r~~.~~<.'..",:..::;. ~r_:~-'~~11
',:-;-'''''"11 '-."....'\: -:<'7~.'\",... ~ ~-i'~ 1 -r-;- ~~ ~ta'" ~Ij.~' ;",.'" ""i- - .:;.~ 1~ T ---, J ~!<"-' t
>"L1i!d.~~k6~i~hi.:Jo;':~,e~s,Jf~~t;o~, ,'. 'mi~im~rr:'io.~~~i.z:~:.' 696 .sq.f ~._ '. . , ':
~ >. "fromca~~rag' e<fimishe8~g.raae to. 1: minimum"lot:wiCldi. i At .; ',"
t "...~ 1:"' ilffl.. '1-'" . ~... v..... t.., "~,,. ~ 0;> 'J t' ,- ~ } ". 'if- - -, ~ < \'
I' - 'aSeta'g'e. r.o'i5fhefg'bil:~' .;. 7" eoi'. "; ~~ 'riiifiimum :Iot deptl1,.' A'A{' "
.....1 \,." ,.~ ~ '" "'10''''..,-'-1,,4....."', "I'" r -,' n < ~ , ~ ".J .
'r'.' ~J)i:liltij'ng'j "'db';e~al.e ;:}9""5%-'~: ,. ,~~I., 'sti-eet setback "~': r:h i ri'im Ii rXi' . ~ .' ,
~. I,'~f\ "liJ' .,JI..-- ~~ "J~ .~; .I!.. ~... .. "I ," [-'i ".t ",./0<: '. "'It;!'" ': ~ ~., ,~ 12\....
1~1 ~$y~l~p~~l)t,coyer~g~7- J 99~ ,'. I ;sid.El"s'~~b~t~7',4' ,rin i,~i r;n.4n;:?~ ;.;:
,,, -, f - . , 1 '. ., ..' . 0 }." Il i:l . -.. , - .
;"<,,~..l'\-"~'~J- :1~.'~~"T -,,~-r~~:~"'.~''''i < "'",.:rJ attatne .!,,-"' '.-t~'., ~."-~ \~;-!;-;'~\
, j"'~'i' . . '" ~ . >{ "'-.' i j'I.[", }" ~ 1- '" /::~);'<l'" >f. Aif: j. "'~!"."'u.' .ft<', .J~ +: \ I.t1'I'""
.. ~ "'.); ".,_t~ '.,~ '_~~.- -,,"-." ..... .... rear.setbaCKc'o'mltllr;t;lur:n.to,al"
!~ .".:__~:; (f......,':.. }'>';1.1..,,~\'i''''j.f'' .;'"~'}::'.: ;........,\.~~';.."'j/"" ~r..,,_;;~.~-... '. ,:",:,_"
,:', "~nJ,Jf "<(. ,:. "'-';, > _'4~"" , , ~">" r' C . 'Jey'af1c1-4{ to':garage,doQr'~,~;> c'.
, J ,";~'; 'f~:'r,~ 1'-,..~r ~ ~). r.. ;fri., }'.% ~ ~ j . t "","'\.. f '- u:. ' "";,; :;.. ~~ ~ ~ t- ft' dJ') .... i; ...", ~ no
p, ,~...S>;':" ::"~, ..."~ ~'~1'~; >,' . .,"',"'~~' .' \open'spll,ce.~,6o'sg, . e<ZK'or',' :
~"t:.~ ,'~f\~'<fr'-~;.~l:;r.,'1 )~~"~";~~-;;:::,,, r::,~' ~'.::: ,,~:~~~-";.:'ir;~:': ~ifI-.+:'it--/~,~"::A!.''',;.,..!~ ,,'I
~~ ,~~"~"':, /b-"""'~ii'~~'O.'~~"'1 ~'_:<..t,"i~ ~ ,cp0rCrl'if'~:1.~:' ert". ~ ""'.. ',,""~..~ 1
'~",J~.\' d'..,}.rl\">'} f>:".;l,Zf1"~~'l ;~f' ..:;".........,. ,.';~' ,::.~~l!~.~~, '~~ ". .~".....:_".~tt,,~d ~-:~ ~~~
"', ""f.'};,'\.' .':', ',. ,', ,~. '.!/'. ;";"'''0, ,..,.~. C ,'parl<mg; J ,stall' p,er Unltwltn,,2:'';'
~ ~~.,'/'"~~: '<I", <1,'""".... -"'41' ....r;'>j<(t ~f:"..."7""" t'1'-~-'>~t:1-.~'", ..,r",,"'o'" ~'':~, r":J "r~..'1' ~
!l: .,;: ';'~l,;1Lt1'.: "~i:'.. ,-11. ,:" ,,~,; - ,l..,\,,,,j~ '~'1' 'stalls, for; 2' onmor,e''bedr.oom~';,/ , '1
'~ ~~~{:~:2:~~:~.~~:~~'~~:~~ ;'~?/<".:;'~i:; ,:; .~; J.~ ~~~i!~\~~: ;'.:~:',':~>'~' ~:;i;::;,~:'.~.~::~ :... ~,
~"'f,/,"'t~~""'f'c"~.";'''~'lfl" I!J;.~~'~~""'+"J' "'~'f"''''''''~:t' ?",,,,FF""J_" .k"~?--iIfl.' ~ ~> "'""~"'~~-"", Y_"I"'~lV1tI"'''' '-Ir.l'(,p:< , i-J."'" ,..It-... -.".- ....-
r-~;~{)~<:~.~~~~~I:\' .'P:~) ~J,~ :'::'-~tl~0~:~~~~;..~rr :~,:;.;~-'::..:.1~:.:''-~: j~At~2:=~:( ~,,:~~\1:<-~.~3:~t!}~,.:~, ~~
.... ---~----_.- ---. --- -- ~-~---_.-_. - .._......._~-,~- -. -,-~. - . ~----- .~.__..._-_.- - ,. ~_.- .~._- .- "---.. -, - .--.- ..---_...
. !
,
, .
. ,.. ,.., I
:...h_, . .' ':' '. ..~;.1'.~.{ ",'i-:.;':~"_, .,:"..~;""t~--:-;.'~~~ .~ ",:~ : :'.j
52 ~. .." 11:1 ,', ,.~, ", :'t<.~i .'.' ~ """ .... ~. 1
'- ..... <- ~ ~. '~.' ..... I
---- - - -~.__._- -- .. . -_.~-_._-_. - ___ ___ _ ____.. ._. ___. _.M'_ __ ___~ ___..~__ .... _._~_._.~_______. .
[\ f.'] 0 "1
\ V7"'~'V;...J I
V ) \' ~~'l 0 '
l~:A" [J2^~~_ ~,~
n (1
I I J r.;; (;;J
~~:J C::)~;;,
,--, !"l
I n )r;;Ji-'~'r-,..{(.n~r"
! ",/ ,<:'?l i (1 J :::...."", rl!f'::\ v /
L.,::.-' ,-):.J L ,-=h,] .., /J
~1~~Gf{f~
t'1?'I-1-.v <>\ '_~';
i1~~~. ~~:tJl;;
V~i' F~:~t ;;7(1
l.>i-,p. n,~,}$t!H
~:::"~":..~~Ch::n4.S'.:;';"'.l;';
.~(~~.~",
'f. ".,'
The Sub-Ar'ea;PJan incorporates approximately 4
acres of land designated mixed use. The density'
in this area will be a maximum of 50 dua an"d will
allow unit types ranging from apartment to luxury
multi-family nomes. In addition, a commercial
element coukJ>!!Je incorporated into the mixed use
designation. :::-'0,",
en
'"E
fa
'"C
c
fa
+'
V)
+.I
c:
CJJ
E
Q.,
o
-
CLl
>
ClJ
o
':- ~,::>'".~ ~~. 'I 0.--",-': !~: '" ^~
Allowable Uses' "..
Mixed use mu:lti-family with retail or office
space on main floor of residential building
Detached single-family residences
AccessorY'dwelling units
Cluster developments
Carriage units
Attached single-family residences
Live/work units
. -. .~_... -~~----.~~ . -- ~- - -._- - ~._~~.'- .-_. - ._.-._.~~___~ _ _____.___~_.____ _~____.M_____ __ ~ _______.._ __..____
. "
~ .,' . . \:.: ., -~: ,
. .... .: . . .' .
., . , ,;' ~"''''-;'\ -.' ,,' ^. ;:.>-~. ~,,";,' '. ~'~ -, ." . ,; , :
,~. ,~<' ,., 4ji. . ~~ , . '1 . ~ ' - ... -.. ..
: < ~ ": '.~ .....: .: :'~:"" . ~:, .,;' I.. +, ~. .11\,;. ';. ~p' , ,: . I . ~ . 53
;-.""..( ........ .... ~,-,,,:..~~~.:'W. :J. ,;Ii ,'1:'~'~''''''' . I~ >
-----_._-~. ---..--.. ---~ ....~....._~-- ""- ~..........__.:. . .~--_. - --.... ----.- --------------.- - ... ------':..!
~'~,':'i::;'Ee.-.2.:.4.~~;
'!,-:'~':"_.~'"
c e, tft.., ':',~ ,,4.."i' "': ~.
:.Jt'\";~ ~}~* ';~~;:':' J~
;:~,;~~'~:'~ V~,l~<~~~t:
"s:?! ~:) ~~~~t
~ (1 &vr:;;\fJl
U\:jt lJl-i\.::.-jQ.1
RX';'\fY-' r.~JDo~~-v7
I L..... ",;;;i, (J l~) d'\f
.~ ~l~ ,~',-" \"'-''!j
n nr~
ll})~JG5
Mixed Use Concept on Wheaton Way
c
(()
<
CD
-
o
"'C
3
CD
::s
.....
Vl
ri'
SU
:3
a..
w
""C
a..
U)
r~~(~~~~~~~7:~;-~~?'~~~~~~~7-~7f ~:;,-~~7~'. r,.~ .--~~ .""' ,~ ,~'"'~,~'l~'~;~!:~.~~:':~~f:'::/~~' >~}"~:~'/'
r~'~ ,e;~X:'\)&'ii€lli:ig$ass"[,r': .c:. ~"; ':, : ":Iot h~~tiiremer'i~ts :/"".~,~,:" : ':::~dditio'ri:ar:srl6~arCis~ t,"
r~;':,:~;""":~~;'~~;:-.'~~; ?f~:"'~ ....~':;: ~- ":'.~>.:,:.,f~f ~~j' :'~'~~i~':'~. : .:, ;,::; "..e; : '>d,i"f.':'c":~:. '; 1':);;~?'~\f;~\}':~~~'t;,;~:,. "
~': (~l{u'i1~ihg,h~'!g~t,;"6,dJ,lfi,e:~s~'f~~:' : ,Street "~~b"as:~"",<;>', ,rrfi.QimullJ. 't' ;R~tiiil, Go~~rmerc;ial or:gffiG~' ;, :
r" ~f';or.nrav',era'g' e fidisn"o g'i,!cle.to"'. ~ :other,;setD~Gk!"lo'~rnih,ir;fitf,n1.".c.:, i' :sp"~~~is' ~llbii~'d'aF'gl:&uhd,l~vel\'
I j '''J "-j .. "',it," .', " . ,~", ~ ~"," o. . . ~. - "",';,';'" ',.' ';"',;'" ". "..".
" ,a~er~~e r6gf~he,ighk' r <'"., .' ':i:",:; :,~~si~e'n.ti~lj)at~irig;':",' ',~" ::::':. ::,~', . :~i~Ht~;slq~,I\ti,~f~tf~es~ap.b~~" . ';.~::'
,~;' b}!il,4~f1~:c:o~~r~g~'~~9'9.%' ~. ,:': i';R~r'q~<~',D~~~b9hUJ~i!: ";'., <~' , ~t?~,9~lon'e bui.IClinis:<;>f r~tai(, ' :,
f:~ , ~ev~19~~!'l!1(~c~~~~!'l<';1 d~9Ig~~: b .,~;~~~ t qr: '~Qr~J)ftjfb?~iji~,\~~~ . ~~~"~~r,~~al'~r.~fI}c~:. bui,l~i,~gs:~., '.
I'~ ,"f\, " ;;:,h,;" '",,',.; "'"1;.: ',_ .H ,V'~' ',; '1 ,," open'space;.~10% of-site usal5le, :are 110t""RerrYllfteG. .,'!' '.,y ," ,
~.:I1";')~,j,%~,~- ~ ":'i.'f<-l" !ir:~ r\"t, :~~'"','t '~rl>~r''C.~ ".r,~~~,..... ..."-'~-I'}" ."-lk,d,,\;'..,,.tt....l, _~~#,:\....~:~.. ~'I"'''' ;;;,<:......:.~\ ',~}
I":'" .',' ,,' ,< I '~. ~ ,> '''; ,-:..; r ~,~ ~. Igeneral retail and office!and ~ ,.~' , ~," ~ ;.'~ ,";~ 1, . .:?";:" ,{ '",
Y1Jf.';...~~~t":rjr/, "! :,.0.., '1,T'1.", ''i,'" $-..' ""~-;.'t,,,"'~""'~~"',..:.~ ..~"... ,...;~I.';'..-"";),(l_P..,.' ",.....~~-.." Z .I :~ "~a"'.~.'..1 . _ ,-,
,,: r.':" ," ",: {," ,,~... :",- ,,;~, ",,,.'1 ;, busmess.ser:vlCzes,parkmg"yZ500 ' ~ ,..,'~ ':\'. ,\.. ,_',; , -~'::' ",' ,'. ,'" '
"tJ f"\J""~~;:"--~ _ {~'" ~ l~.l"~ ......,"";j_'(,."..~M"::,;~;_I~'j'}.,.~ \...~~~' ~ "}-~.' ~\IJ j....;:~" ~r'\ ~~-::...< 7> ,,..."",:1 .t....,f','-- .-5;--, ,,1~. 1" :;4,f_" ~' ,,11
i},'~',;f>:.,~,;,.'".<) !'.;~'~/'\":,~"" 2s_qJt.~xen:!Rtf~om Rarkltlg:an,d' < ;'/~;:' ;,..".""-: :"""~,(~,',~",..; ::.,
lif.,.,',.?,_". , -..r::.-....'y'r7.c_.~tl",l.~~"[.~',.ff'_. <;'I'~':tjJ.~ ..... ",~;;:\".Y, ., ,P.t( ...~1 ",,----,'It J. ~-,_....J,\"'~""'l'",J._'oI...'
. .~, .'." "t\.1'~.,"".";.t,,,'''\... 'r..c"",,,,,,~'j'o streetloauma,sRaces..... ~i,h\,..\ ".."r" Jo<o. '< I,;. ',:',
f:t. .....-'1.~,~"h '*........P'~(l..... .1-...;.;;:-1."" ~~''..l.t_'''_s-^.:u~ '..;..,",""'~'v"- ....'-~~,..- '0_..........,1. .fJ......J:4~,~:t: b.i1J"'-i;3>~."".j<" ~ ~ J<'-1.~~",~~'~,IJ.j.."~"~',
,";
.~,t::;,;';"',~!-'.--.r'"t-~""I,,;;n.l~~~ L.....~j.<,.;~i-Jlt,%. ~......I,,J.l>~1 li~''~''-.r-n'~"'''fL,...-?,,.~,t-~>;:'J''-:;:101'r'~,,",,,~,,~_ l.. 1"''1~ .,.-......~"";~::,(~~...........~~''''
~ ,jl
1_,;-:-,,;~............1:.,~~,...:~.........,,:_,.,llo i._..........."'... ........,~,__..-.-~-.-.......-.....__,.-4Io___..r____~......,.."....~,.......,. ~...................
r; ,r,:::~""J01J' (~rn;~~("a-:;\
'::))1 I:::: "-' IF' j '" ' d
'-,_ /1 .f__':-,,- \.::'.r, -''-:.>
LJ t
H..
Open Space
The City of Bremerton has identified the need to increase
the City's supply of parks and open space. Currently, the
level of service for "local park" space is 1.48 acres per 1000
residents and an additional 2.21 acres of "open space" for a
total of 3,69 acres per 1000 residents (this does not include
"regional" open space), The design of the East Park Sub-
Area Plan will house approximately 1100 new residents and
provide approximately 25% of the entire site as open space,
This will exceed Bremerton's current level of park and open
space service for this neighborhood by over 270%.
Goals and Strategies:
· Create a more livable and beautiful
community through park and open
space design. Parks will be designed
to encourage and support social
interaction.
· Establish a hierarchy and variety of
parks and open spaces for a variety of
age groups such as conservation areas,
neighborhood parks, active parks, trails
and sitting areas under trees to meet
the diverse needs of all residents.
· Design active parks to maximize use
by locating areas for easy supervision
- e.g. within close proximity of homes,
maximizing supervision from homes
and the community at large and by
providing appropriate lighting.
· Build durable parks and reduce
maintenance costs, using iow
maintenance and sustainable
landscaping.
· Include porches adjacent parks to
increase community interaction.
Provide adequate sized trash and
recycling bins in park areas,
· Create open spaces easily accessible to
residents.
· Create public viewing areas,
· Use open spaces for water quality.
· Provide for the Urban Trail along the
south portion of the site.
Provide a functional wildlife corridor
linking the Madrona Forest on the west
to the Riparian Corridor on the east.
Ff;~7T;~~
i~''':'' 1; ~.::.\ t, ~ 1
f~~t:~ ;~;\~~;nil
~..-11~~; I jl.:~},!J t J,~.
:i' ":'~.r..:~:J('l.:1
r.1'~..::...,....,.,;~.i;.:"J ~i
i:~~~~~
r. 'f~:f,;:'l.}~~I'
~ ~,~~'-::~.,:::
(I)
'"E
ns
""C
c:
(U
......
Vl
......
c
Cl,)
E
c..
o
-
IV
>
Q)
C
j~~;~2~~1
,'.f.~, :s;f
~t(?~ ,~.~,~ '~~~;<'~~ ~~~
'" ~t ~,-t Iii""l'
~r~:::{t
c
(1)
<
CD
.....
o
"'C
3
(I)
~
....
V)
"*'
D)
~
0-
j.\)
a
VI
,r--, ~ (1 ;;~ ".--.,
{ (-.I( rU-V\11U' Rr;:,~~vr;:. iil~ '(i-J"'.)f(1U" I ('t J~~'\ ';'\[fO, (I \0-~r~)-V:~QG@---c:!: -;, '\
\, _"'11, J' ,.::,.~, 'C'.....; j ,<J, !' I; , \ ....J / ) ,=,\, I [-', 'eji( '" ,I
...."'---",~ ~ ~~'-'. "\,. ~ '-l ~ _f- . u.~ ,,-.....-...,.
',,1"
Conservation Open Space
The Sub-Area Plan incorporates
approximately 7 acres of land
desig'Qated conservation open space.
This"space includes the madrona forest
to the west and an area adjacent to the
riparian corridor southeast of the s'ite,
~-. --/ ~.
n. 11. 0
! A \(;...~ IJU\,- vy~
" r' ,,, \., ~l "" V I, =)
,_ 1....I"..~ J._
((~'VY;;~\18
'-~../~V01J U
t'--;
\. C-' r--""""\. ....:t "'-r~
"i)' :' ,c.."~'1 r"'o' 3""
~ 1\)Jf" L ..
..... LJ/\-"..
r]f~!:~~~}l
I~'" ,1, ,~) ","1,'
~UJ!~~~)
, -~", .~ '
~. '}:,- 1.,
Active Open Space
V)
'"'C
'-
(ti
""C
C
CU
~
V)
.....
s::
GJ
E
0..
o
G)
>
Q)
C
,./,The Sub-Area Plan incorporates
:;~.gapproximately 4 acres of land
designated as active open space.
},his space is comprised of
^' a'pproximately two one acre parks and
open corridors connecting the YMCA
and madrona forest to the entire
neighborhood. The park areas should
H.... :W9vtcje for group and small athletic
activities. These areas may include
play structures, or other recreational
features.
~{~~~~t~
.".~,,~ "'~>"
:W1~ ~~~~~~(:
,i';"'~ :C',u ,f',{,
':~:~1'0;>'~,~, ;. ::f\,,~e>
~hu.; - ~~i1~,
o
tD
<
(D
-
o
"'C
3
(D
::s
lI"+
(J')
r+
$.\.)
:3
c..
f>>
""'C
Q.,
en
! D\0.~~",Q~. c~''0'\rl.G~ (~r:=:-ovr.>rlJl'>::l (,,1!~(,i;"'\1(~:;;'\
,;~ C! ":;;, Y 1( ~",,' ,'-.) }. A ,=,,' fI I ~]I v J' '" iI\ c::o!
~" "c. -' '-0....../ I r' ,..:c.,> eJ "--" ;::,;~..... ,.........
_ L/
',:r.
~:" .,"^ -
":;t,.)
~.
'~ ~.. ?~:~:\~,;'<
':~~,S,s:ijie Open Space
. ,\,v', /, ,I'; '_
, " 'C . .
The ~ub-Area Plan incorporates
approximately 1 acre of land
designated as passive open space.
One space is located at the
intersection of Schley and Magnuson.
Cur:n[nJly, this area has a Kitsap Transit
stop"and a "makeshift" park space
under the canopy of a Madrona, Fir,
and,,M<:lple cluster. The new park space
has been built off of these features and
will be expanded to create a sense of
entry arrival from the north and east.
Additional space is located across
YMCA:tl1"is space will include existing
trees and viewing areas,
: . . -" ....... - . -.. . . d_ - u. - . - .... .. ---...-..... -- ... ... ... . . ,-... .-.. . .., -- --. -" ...., .. .. - ... -...... .....-1
, i
, . !
, . : .. ~. I, !
--'5-8'-'-'~ __._.. . _. __ . ._.____._.__ m_ _._:_______.. '. . ~~... ,.:::: ~.?!:.~_ ~.> ~:~~ _:_ .__f-.:~_~~i~.~:~~'~"~;'~:_._~_.~: (:. j._~.'..i
Tt0@l~ ~~rc?f~f1Wff~ID(Q)[ffi @ro:@[(L1 ~)rp~Jcs@
If L.
>..
~-~ :~:~~~"l~r~;:;l",:
'1r~~preservation Open Space
-, ' ','....
,".s,"::':;'.
The"SUb-Area Plan incorporates
approximately 1 acre of land designated as
tree preservation open space. Although
other trees will be saved, this space is
Prot~9ting three significant oak trees.
Eas(Rark LLC and the design team feel
. this area should have additional attention
to ensure tree preservation. Before
constrUdion a certified arborist shall write
a report-1nd clearly outline necessary
steps to ensure survival during and after
construction. Similar to the passive
or)'en~p.ac:eto the northeast, this area will
enhance "the-neighborhood and serve as
an arrival element from Wheaton Way.
~!~2f~~~~
[j",...._-"""t'., "].I
1"-0::"" "r:~~'1
l:...."'~~ =.
t!f$'L~u '~i~ll
V)
""C
:r...
f\'S
"'C
s::
c:'CI
+"
tn
...
s::
(I)
E
0..
o
-
QJ
>
Q)
o
- . _~_ - - . .. - u_ . ~ _. __ _. _. . _..~_. _~ _. __ _. _. . _ _.___ __________. _ ..~. .. . ~._ _ _ _____~ __~ _ _"_______ ___________.
I .~:;~'i._'>-' .~~~::.; :::~ ~::::~~_~~::.,:..~i:~< ~~~_._~>.. ','. .:2:._ _~. "'/~ ._ :_._ __ u_ ___ ___.________ ______._h. ;-"-59'-'
~f~r;~f~
:,l~,," <; ",
!:: ~,:
c
~
tl)
-
o
"'0
3
tl)
:s
P+-
C/)
P+
su
:s
c..
D)
-.:
c..
(/)
ffj-fn n!~llOC'Ir::::t '\\\)7!~w'y-.;:;
j ,jllJ i; D;! i ,\L~, \/;\ 1('; l\/~J
.; ~ l:::J "-- -" 1...0 , '--' _ \0..., '- :":;1./ y-....-
Public Ways
The circulation system and
street design was created
to provide neighborhood
connectivity while emphasizing
pedestrian and low speed auto
access. Schley Boulevard was
left in its original alignment
to conserve existing utilities.
It is proposed to be widened
to include parking and curb
returns to both sides as traffic
calming measures. A grid
system was designed to provide
multiple routes to each home.
Neighborhood streets are one
lane two way tree lined roads
with sidewalks. A variation of
this street is the Country Lane
that forms a transition to the
edge homes and conservation
areas. Alleys and the woonerf
separate garages and services
from the pedestrian friendly
neighborhood streets.
LEGEND
EXl$TINC STREET
~~~
NErCHBORHOOO STREET
MAGNUSON AND EASTE~ BOUNDARY
WOONERF
All?
GREEN STREET
..~"
EB
.J
. -.-.- ~ ---- - - --- .. - - ----- -..._- ---- -- -- ..-..... ---..-- --._--- -------_..._---..-. ----- .-..-.---------- --- ------ -------- --.-.,
. ,
,
: I
. , ' 1
i ~. I : l
. .
1--60--,,: '. ,': :',.;' " f.;:' ":'~.:: i'.:.< 1....".,_,...... .r.'.: :i, '. ~ . i
--- - .....--- -- - .. - -......_-------- - - ----- ..- ..--- .-. - ---- -- -- ------ - - --.._--- - - ..-_. -- ---.-- .. . ---.- ----
r'--.." @UO n'iYf r;
'l' ~)n n 0" II orr \\) V ;S;;)\ \~/ ~
j ~ . "'-..'? ,'-Ai C:;.J)/li.;
RE\lISEP
Schley Boulevard
Schley Boulevard will remain in the same
location and serve as the north-south arte-
rial through the site connecting Sylvan and
Wheaton Way, Schley Boulevard will have two
travel lanes with on street parking on both
sides. Two large planting areas will buffer the
sidewalks providing a pedestrian friendly envi-
ronment. Auto access to homes on Schley will
be served from alleys or the woonerf.
~<.
.~,I:-
sJ_?1J 5'-0" ]'-0"'
mm I
setback walk, panting
]'-0"
parking
1-0"
parking
11'-0"
drive lane
11'-0"
drive lane
]'-0"
planting
60'-0" ROW
en
""C
L.
CU
-c
s:
CU
+a
V)
.....
s::
CJ)
E
c..
o
"ij
>
CJ)
C
: ,: - ...-- - - . u__.. -.-. ,:'. ',' .-~ -.... ---- -:. - " -- -. -. .. -------, - ---- .----.---.. . -.- - - - --------. - -', 1
, ,
, . ~ . . . ~ . . l
; ".-' .':,' : . -, ':<. - :.~ "'~~. :....I~;<-- '.. ..:-_<:.-::.>~~:{): ~<'.1 ,i(:"~-, ";:: -." .:. ',.' ':,': '_" 61:
..__. . _ _.. __~l__.__."_ .0_ .. ._._n__. _. .__. . ~ _____ ... _____._ _ .......____
[f~~r~~~l
~"" ",if" ':'~'Jir
:~~,~~;L~t~
i~,;Ijl!ll;l, <'\if
;~~2~t~~ ,_:.:~~~t:
c
('I)
<
('I)
.......
o
"'0
3
tI)
::s
.....
V)
.....
Q,)
::s
c..
Q,)
0-
en
r~ 'Ik~'o ''''tv7'?
I D I fl 1'., '0(;:::> \ \} :.tV /(~~U-'r\'nre5;;;
; ~'I!ii \'-\ \'A d }fl'
-.., ,.....c~ '-~-'" V' (/
Neighborhood Street
The neighborhood street is designed to serve
as an urban residential access street The
neighborhood street will have a traveling lane
and street parking on both sides. Queuing
lanes will provide emergency vehicle staging
areas and passing opportunities The uphill
side of the neighborhood street will have a
planting area and sidewalk. The downhill side
of the road will have bioswales that will serve
as a part of East Park's natural storm water
system. Behind the swale will be a sidewalk.
~
~~
~"
~ ~J ~~"
--- '~
' I
j
1
1
'I
J
:~
....
./~
~/_//
v _______If
c/ LL
't::==
I,~
]'-on
parking
drive lane
51'-0" ROW
, 'u -,-, ,--- _n__u ------ - -- ",---------- -- ----- --- -- - _ ---_ -____ U_"" u_______n_n,'____ --- 'n_ --- --- -- -- - _n - ____u_ ----1
, I
, , ' " I
.- -..---': ' .: ,',,', ;.~,/ ,1,.., -, :' ,', - ',"'-'", -:"",,!
6 2 ' , ,.. '.; '.n_ ,..'" .0, " I
~_. -" .- ------.------ .--.. -----~----. ---.. __ .______... ____._ __~ M _~~._______.._._ . ._..._______...J
1_, rt f] 0 ,\\,,'0,7
~;ll In I f;\i f~, rr-.:J '\Y V i';.;J" \'f11(~
Ll '. l,vl', \\.", )~,("" ~j
A..J ---./ ..... _ ....:' W ,,-. /,;l .....,_
Queuing Lane
This section is a service area for emergency
vehicles. By incorporating a grid circula-
tion pattern and 16' x 60' queuing lanes
throughout the neighborhood, each house
can be served from multiple routes and
locations.
~--~
===1
:::;:::::iL u
5"0"
walk
16'-0"
drive lane
10'-0"
planting
15'-0"
bioswale
51'-0" ROW
5'-0"
walk
f?~i::~fl
lZ~;'~l ..J<_..,,\f~;~[~'~}
~;:"~iiti
(I)
"t'J
l-
ns
"'tJ
s::
ns
+'
V)
.....
C
CJ)
E
0..
o
-
(IJ
>
OJ
a
- -..... -~-~ - .-- -- -. . -~- - .. - . ..-..- -.-- - .. --. -.- ~_. - -. - - - - . - -- . .--. - -- -- -------. --- ~. - -_._._..~. -.--
: :...,::.,..~;, 'l~ '...:<,~d; ~"'~ '~~.:\,~;>!:"~.. ~<'_~ .~ ,.~~ '. .<,: '. " :-'-63'
1._ __.._._.. _~_ _ __ __.._ ____.' . ____. ____ .. __ __________ ___.________ ___ _ _ _ _____--.1
m~f~ir
It~:1 '1:,-,\,." J ~
r~~~[;}~!
:f~r:$~E;~\f~:::~~
':~:,1il'';''~~~::j;.;/~,&I~,
:~~,2tl!f.7'...::....":S
c
(1)
<
(1)
-
o
"C
3
t1>
::::s
r+
(I)
r+
su
:s
c...
Q.)
""'C
Q..
(I)
Country Lane
Magnuson Street and the Country Lane are
designed to serve the east and west edge
neighborhoods. This section is very similar
to the neighborhood street however,guest
parking will be provided on each individual lot.
This allows the removal of parking on one side
to minimize pavement and incorporate a bio-
swale in its place as part of East Park's natural
storm water system. This road section would
resemble a typical country road without curb,
gutter and sidewalk on oile side. In place of a
typical sidewalk will be a 2' ribbon of concrete
between the bioswale and driving lane to serve
as a pedestrian pathway. The uphill side of the
country lane will have a planting area and a
sidewalk to match the neighborhood street.
~~,~
~-'"
1IIi' """-'"
'"
rli ~~
Jr-' ~F~~:':'I, "
1\=.11 ~::..~"
'j;J'
-if
'Hi~
5'~O"
min 5'_on 5'"-0"
setback walk planting
rC)'1lflfl:nuprc' \~Vl€1\'I71~
1-1 ~I...!C,/w \.,:;:> j( e:.,J2/ e)
/
/~
~
/,
g'-
c
,..
,~~,
"<<'~.t--'"-..~
-~
i-o"
parking
2'
11'-0"
bioswale
11'.0"
drive lane
"-0" ROW
D~~~'. 'lJ.1 rl,~n: 'fire tJ,\Y7tJ7c., \- .Y;:'
, I Ii! \v y,,,-?hV/\.'<:
, .~ , i U 1:1 \ ^ J ~ ~) , .q "\
./..-~... -......~ ~.J '--10/'-"':"/
11'~On
bioswale
4'-0'
path
drive lane
43'-0" ROW
Magnuson
Magnuson Street and the Country Lane are
designed to serVe the east and west edge
neighborhoods. This section is very similar
to the neighborhood street however, guest
parking will be provided on each individual lot.
This allows the removal of parking on one side
to minimize pavement and incorporate a bio-
swale in its place as part of East Park's natural
storm water system. This road section would
resemble a typical country road without curb,
gutter and sidewalk on one side. In place of a
typical sidewalk will be a 4' ribbon of concrete
between the bioswale and driving lane to serve
as a pedestrian pathway. The uphill side of the
country lane will have a planting area arid a
sidewalk to match the neighborhood street.
i~o"
parking
, rrr~9~?:~j
I ,jj- ':'> "::'" ~1
L:1(Sf~ Sj;\~l ~"j
f1l:~?). - ': j"
k~~~~ :::11;.f
h',", ~,I
jt,t.:~~ '.J~~r 1
!:~,.'..~ ~~'\'-
l~. .::': -,_"-:::::i
V}
-,:,
a..
CU
\j
s::
CU
.....
V)
+d
s:::
(IJ
E
0-
o
.......
(IJ
>
QJ
C
~. .- --. - . -- ~.-. .--~-- -- -_.. - .. ~--- -. - ... ~ ~ R .- -. _~ _ ~ ~_ _ _ _ _ _~ _ _ _. __. ~ __ ____. _h___
. ',.'. l~' . > -.: ':"':. '~.~ '.- : , ' ~:: "':h ",' . ' : ," " " i ': ' - ! - - 65'-
__. _. ~_~ ___ .. ._~__..__a _ .-"--- ___ _..__ ___. .. _..__ __ _______ ____. __ _ .____._. _ _____p __..._.. ______..___ _ _.__... ___. ~_. "
:'~'::~;;:~;j;:~,.;~~'7f":
j.{ f ',"" ~-~iqg .~1!:
:~~;~~- -~ - ~~ j' "'.~;
:l~i~"~ ~c
f~t;l:'~ E
'F';r 1:
,!f~5Z~ tp
~~f:'
c
CD
<
(1)
-
o
"a
3
('I)
::s
.....
V)
r+
S>>
::s
c..
M
""'l:
a..
t:I)
WlllJ100o@ V!}/}~J2lrB
Woonerf Fire Lane Section
"Woonerf" is a Dutch term for a common space
to be shared by pedestrians, bicyclists, and
low-speed motor vehicles. They are typically
narrow streets without curbs and sidewalks, and
vehicles are slowed by placing trees, planters,
parking areas, and other obstacles in the street.
Motorists become the intruders and must travel
at very low speeds below 10 mph. This makes a
street available for public use that is essentially
only intended for local residents, pedestrians
and guests. The woonerf will be designed to a
16' section (clear) to accommodate emergency
vehicles and will serve as a fire lane.
~
to garage doors
to garage doors
20' -0" ROW
1.'-t fL /l'~ ,-\,\~- r;,
Lr'I'D i n: D'~ !in,r;:.) \ v (;/t;1\V7rjj~'"
\.1,/, 'L, \" ,,\ """J
.,....."..._/ JL '..:..> \.] v <..::.J1/ ....~
Alley Section
Alleys are an essentIal element for a suc-
cessful pedestrian oriented community. By
providing alleys, the automobile accesses
the home from the back allowing porches
and architectural details to dominate the
public realm.
"',.
::,,>--..,
:=?=~:>
~~~---~-~'-~.-
~,.
"
4'-0"
min 2'
setback
12'-0"
drive lane
4'-0'"
2' min
etback
to garage doors
16'-0" ROW
to garage doors
ef~~~*0-;
~., ~1~" " ....."
!!~ ~;~'!1:
,~"..' -"', r>AA-~"
r~ .. ,<,'~f
t~ ~~.~.;it~;
(I)
""C
'-
C'U
""0
s::
ns
oI<-i
V)
+&
s::
Q)
E
c..
o
-
Q)
:>
QJ
C
~~1iW?~~1
,~;i'~1J :i! f,1
~~~L% f
c
CD
<
(1)
-
o
"'C
3
(1)
:::s
.....
V)
.....
D)
:::s
c..
A)
""I:
0..
(f)
lPJrilllliJlJ&s \~~2JS
Wildlife Corridor Street Section
The Wildlife Corridor is a a minimum 50' wide
public right of way that ru ns where a street
would typically exist. This corridor connects
" the Madrona Forest on the western edge of
the site to the Riparian Corridor to the east.
The wildlife corridor is planted with native
vegetation allowing wildlife to safely travel
~between natural habitat areas within the region.
This public way section also incorporates
bioswales and infiltration space and serves as a
part of East Park's natural storm water system.
/
~'"
==0:>,
Ii)
~t
::;7 '"
* walk meanders through habitat corridor,
50'-0" min. ROW
~~ n 'U0 ,- ~'or
?)1-1 fl [)\! U~(l--:) \\~ v!Ic;J\yy;;.0'~
, .!... J '-"\ \ ^' f d I~~
j ,-.W l _.,'- '-=~ J U '_-_ )!~'
<.I
Pedestrian Green Street Section
Green streets are 40' wide "pedestrian"
public right of ways that'run where streets
would typically exist. These green streets
lead to parks, the YMCA, and all areas of the
neighborhood forming anopen space network.
They will have homes fronting the greens and
will provide access to porches and to .front
doors. Green streets also provide a safe area
where neighbors can gather together as well as
a place for children to play in close proximity
to their homes while parents keep a watchful
eye, This public way section also incorporates
bioswales and infiltration space and serves as a
part of East Park's natural storm water system.
------,1
I
I
I
='
7
=,
5J~O"
walk
r~~~~7ti~
'l~; TI '." ,.;! J',
. K,"!,;, l<':J Il..'{" ~
I" ;?, .. ':'f _,"cr.-
,'~'I,"-A f:-"v~ .';'t"
i:;:?~^ ~~~~ ;;:'r~fJ
;1~':ld '<'1.... '1.-t;,~1
t: !~f;ii:f.i' :.~ ~~~t,;
~r~=yj(: }~{ZftJ
lc.,\",,,,~.;>-,-,-.;;r,, ..:I
t:'1.,;,..;)_,. ~:o:~ ..1;____-..1
1"~-.--~~
30'-0"
green
V)
""0
So..
ns
-0
s:
res
+d
V')
.......
s:::
Q)
E
Q..
o
-
Q)
>
Q)
c
s'-OU
walk
40'-0" ROW
.. ~ ~_ ~ ~_ ~H _ _ ___ . .__ . __.__.___ ___.____._ .... ..____ ____ __ _ _.. _ ___~ ___ _____ _______ _ ___. ___ .__ ____ __ _ ___.. .. ..__
, ..
. -
,. ; -', :- :, <.', <>:,',- ::- " .~~:!r::'-'1::;'!;; -, ;' "\:\~l, " - >.: . .;, . . : ---69---
. --~--_. --- . -----_.~_.- ---.--. - .. ---.- ..--.--"----.--. ----.----- -- - ----- -- ------- -- ---- --. --...-...
,.... GQ)lj"'1r1 . '
i [)1 I r,::) \':\l ", <;:1
U:/illJ LP D~~ \~}!};.JfJd)
Pedestrian Lane Section
The pedestrian lane section helps create a
network of sidewalks and other public paths
throughout the neighborhood for pedestrian
connectivity. They provide access to land-locked
lots in cluster developments and provide oppor-
tunities for interaction and activity. A pedestrian
lane will be provided to all homes that do not
front on a neighborhood street, green street,
park or common green. Pedestrian lanes shall
be a minimum of15 feet wide with a minimum
5-foot sidewalk.
o
C1>
<
CD
-
o
"'0
3
CD
::s
.....
tn
.....
D,)
::s
Q..
~
""C
a..
(I)
5' _oJ! 5' ~o" S' -au
setback walk setback
15'-0"
Access Easement
(('-::"~') ". ]lr'Ji~""""" nw''1 nf~I'l (;:;"::1'UOn.. -~ I ~,rj'm''''''D
. 0\' i ,..,.,,' 0 I r' I . """ ! '>. , elf", \ I ~
: . l . I j ~. ,.,1 ~ ' '(0
'2::_~ __/~.L l.9..,~.. :..A'-AIC::~jd t:::.:> ~ I.. L ~J]
!J
Cluster Homes
"
,
Existing Trees
-SIte:
- Native Growth /4re;J.
. PUblic Parks:
- PrIvate !=>pen Space:
. Total Open Space:
47 Acres
687Acres
S.03Acres
1.35 Acres
13.25 Acres
- Front Loaded Single FamIly:
. . Alley Loaded SIngle Farrillr
::: carriage Unit: '
-dusterUmt:
- Townhomes:
- Luxury Apartments/COndos:
. Retail .
52 units
8] unIts
42 unItS"
42 unIts
llg'unlts
66 u~its
4~OOO sq ft
en
-0
'"'
CU
.,.,
C
CU
~
V)
~
C
(lJ
E
c..
o
.-
G)
>
Q)
C
Luxury Apartme'ntsjCondos
SITE DATA
. .....,.. ".""OPEN SPACE SUMMARY
- Current zOning: MF, 8-18 d"ua '
- Interim rezone: R-10, mix. 10 dua. min. 5 dua
- O,evelopment Process - ComprehensIve Plan Dl!signatlO~ ofPu~lIc
'~.)-~r Redevelopme;nt Site and.~a'st~r ~evelopmentZone .
i":,'c,,r:' .
-UNIT SUMMARY
. Total Units:
408 units
~.;:'
., .
EBA'''d
City of Bremerton
Department of Community Development
345 - 6th Street, Suite 600
Bremerton, W A 98337-1873
Phone: (360) 473-5275
Fax: 360 473-5278
WAC 197-11-960 Environmental checklist.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions, An environmental impact statement (EIS)
must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The
purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and
to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is
required.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to descnbe some basic information about yom proposal. Governmental
agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impactso of your proposal are significant, requiring
preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the mostc precise information kn()wn, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of yom knowledge. In most cases, you
should be able to answer the questions from yom own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If
you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to yom proposa~ write "do not know" or "does not
apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations.
Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of yom proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or
on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help descnbe yom proposal or its environmental
effects, The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain yom answers or provide additional
information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for noriproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN
ADDmON, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposa~" "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKr.ROTTNn
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
EAST PARK
2. Name of applicant: EAST PARK, LLC
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
APPLICANT: c/o EAST PARLLLC CONTACT PERSON:
1601 114th Ave. SE Suite 100 Phone Number:
Bellevue, W A 98004 Fax Number:
Jack Willing
425-646-6317
425-646-6313
4, Date checklist prepared: October 14,2005
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Bremerton, Department of Cormnunity Development
WAC (4/15/98)
[CH. 197-11- WAC-Po 53-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
6. Proposed timing or schedule (ihcluding phasing, if applicable):
Site improvements SpringlSUIIUllt'!t 2006 '
Project to be completed in four phases over a period of four years.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
No
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal. Phase 1 Environmental Assessment, Earth Solutions NW LLC, 6/24/2005;
Geotechnical Engineering Study, Earth Solutions NW LLC, 7nt2005
Traffic Report, Heath and Associates, Inc., 11/15/2005
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None known.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Master Use Permit
Preliminary Plat Approval
Final Plat Approval
Vacation of Right of Way
Grading Permit
Developers Extension Agreement
Sub Area Plan
Site Specific Rezone
II. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to descnbe certain aspects of your p'roposal. You do
not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific
information on project description.)
This approximately 48.3 acre property was previously used as military housing for the Puget Sound Naval
Shipyard. The housing project has been demolished, leaving only the abandoned paved parking lots and the
Magnuson Way and Schley Boulevard rights of way, street sections and utilities. The proposal is a master
development plan consisting of a minimum of 400 housing units including at least 70 multifamily units, plus
a minor a~ount of retail/commercial and office space, open space, revised rights of way and utilities.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site( s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by
the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
to this checklist.
A portion of the SW quarter and the SE quarter of Section 12, Township 24N, Range IE W.M., City of
Bremerton, Kitsap County, WA. The parcel is north and west of the intersection of Wheaton Way and
Schley Boulevard. The north parcel boundary is approximately 300 ft north of the intersection of
Magnuson and ScWey. The east parcel boundary is approximately 250 ft east of the intersection of
Magnuson and Schely.
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 2
[Chapter 197-Il-WAC- P.5-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B.' F,NVTRONMRNT AI, F,I,F.MRNTS
1. Earth
a, General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other...
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Native slope
(outside project construction boundary): 7~%, Native slope (inside project
construction boundary): 35:l:%, Previous development fill slope: 50:1:%
c, What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, IID.lck)? If you Irnow the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland Shelton, Kilchis and Harstine series soils.
Generally, soils were silty sand With gravel (SM) containing occasional layers
of poorly graded sand with silt and gravel (SP-SM) and poorly graded sand
(SP). An isolated deposit of silt (ML) was also observed. See geotechnical
report.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils'in the immediate vicinity?
If so, describe.
None known, see geotechnical report for details.
e. Descnbe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed, Indicate source of fill,
The site will be graded for the proposed access roads and building ~ites.
Excavations for utilities are also planned. The approximate range of
earthwork quantity is from 75,000 to 100,000 cubic yards of cut and fill.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
descnbe.
Yes, erosion is a potential probleni if significant rainfall occurs during the
construction phase of the project.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphah or buildings)?
Approximately 35% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces.
(20% buildings, 15% roads)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if
any:
A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be implemented as
approved by the City of Bremerton public Works. Asphalt paving, land-
scaping and storm drainage control improvements wiD stabilize the site in
the long term.
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 3
[Chapter 197-l1-WAC- P,5-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
2. Air
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,
automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) cfuring cons1Iuction and when the project
is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities ifknown.
Dust and emissions from heavy equipment will result from
construction. Automobile emissions will result from traffic at the site.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If
so, generally describe. '
None known
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
No extraordinary measures are proposed to reduce automobile emissions.
3. Water
a. Surface:
I) Is there any surface water body on or in the innnediate vicinity of the site
(including year-rOlUld and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)?
If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or
river it flows into.
A stream is located along the eastern parcel boundary. The stream
discharges into the Port Washington Narrows.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please descnbe and attach available plans.
On-site grading, road construction and utility installation will occur within
200 ft of the stream. Additional work may be required off-site on a
stormwater outfall to the Port Washington Narrows.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None proposed or required.
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 4
[Chapter 197-11-W AC - P.5-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities ifknown.
No.
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year floodplain? If so, note location on the
site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?
If so, descnbe the type of waste and anticipated volwne of discharge.
No.
b, Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water?
Give general description, pmpose, and approximate quantities ifknown.
No.
2) Descnbe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks
or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industria~ containing
the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Descnbe the general size of the
system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to
serve.
Side sewer connections to an extension of the municipal sanitary sewer
main is planned for each lot.
c, Water runoff (including stormwater):
1) Descnbe the sOlrrce ofrunoff(including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, ifknown). Where will this water flow?
Will this Water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Storm water runoff from the roofs and streets will be collected and conveyed to
the existing or newly constructed municipal storm sewer main for discharge to
the Main Street stormwater outfall.
2) Could waste materials e~ter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe,
Yes, residential and automobile wastes ,could enter the drainage system.
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 5
[Chapter 197-11-W AC - P,5-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
Temporary erosion/sedimentation control will be designed and constructed in
accordance with the 1992 Puget Sound Stormwater Management Manual and City of
Bremerton Municipal Code Chapter 15.04. Permanent controls, will be designed to
the same standards to reduce and mitigate these potential impacts. Low Impact
Development (LID) strategies will be incorporated into the design of the community.
4. Plants I
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: oak, birch
X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: madrona forest
shrubs
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
X
grass: meadow
pasture
crop or gram
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, slamk cabbage, other
water plants: water illy, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Invasive plants will be removed - ivy and blackberry as well as open grass/meadow.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site,
None Known.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
Tree protection fences at the dripline of existing trees to remain. Proposed landscaping to include street
trees on all proposed streets with an emphasis on native and drought tolerant species.
5, Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be
on or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Chinese Ring Necked Pheasant, Quail,
mannnals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
A bald eagle nest is located approximately 630' southeast of site. Please see
attached occupancy/productivity survey.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
None known.
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 6
[Chapter 197-11-W AC - P.5-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Conservation of native forest
Greenways
Native plantings
Preservation of significant existing trees
Bioswales and rain gardens provide cover and habitat
6. Energy and natural resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed projecfs energy needs? Descnbe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
Electric, natural gas, and solar will be used for domestic residential heating,
cooling, and cooking.
BV ALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally descnbe,
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Energy efficient buildings are anticipated to include passive and active solar
design strategies.
7. Euvironmental health
a. Are there any enviromnental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
There isa possibility of limited amounts of asbestos containing material on the
site. See the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Report.
1) Descnbe special emergency services that might be required.
None required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
None known.
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 7
[Chapter 197-11-W AC - P,5-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for ~xample: traffic, construction, operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short-term basis: construction noise limited to normal business hours.
Long-term basis: noise from traffic and residential activities.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Limit construction activities to normal business hours.'
8. L~d and shoreline use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Site - vacant
West - conservation of native forest
North - single family and multifamily residential development
East - single family and multifamily reSidential development and recreation
South - commercial (YMCA, city pool, city park, skate park, ice rink) and
education (Montesorri School)
I
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, descnbe.
No.
c, Descnbe any structures on the site.
None - vacant site.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
MF - 8-18 (Note: comprehensive plan and proposed zoning code changes zone to
R-10)
[ What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Public sector redevelopment site.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? Ifso, Specify,
No.
1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 8
[Chapter 197-1I-W AC - p, 5-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
1200 residents, 20 employees
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatIble with existin& and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
Sub Area planning process.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low-income housing.
120 high, 240 middle, 100 low, totaling 460 units.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing. "
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control houSing impacts, if any:
Low Impact Development (LID) - street stormwater design
Open Space - protection of native forest and significant trees, parks to include
passive and active open space
10. Aesthetics
a, What is the tallest height of any proposed structure( s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
60' will be the tallest height of any proposed structure. The principal exterior
building materials will include wood, wood substitutes, masonry, concrete, steel,
and glass.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
There will be minor obstruction to adjoining lots on the west side of the property.
Measures to create view corridors for these properties will be used.
c, Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Building planning and character incorporated in the master development plan.
11, Light and glare
a. What type ofIight or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 9
[Chapter 197-II-W AC - p, 5-64]
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
Minimal glare from residential windows at dusk and dawn.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d, Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
N/A
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 10
[Chapter 197-11-W AC - P.5-64)
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
12. Recreation
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY U$E ONLY
a. What designated and infonnal recreational opportunities are in the innnediate vicinity?
City Pool, YMCA, soccer field, skate park, city park playfield, ice rink, nature
trail.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, descnbe.
No.
c, Proposed measmes to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Access to nature trail, approximately one acre of active recreation parks planned,
passive parks, and greenway walking paths.
13, Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally descnbe.
None known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None known.
c. Proposed measmes to reduce or control impacts, if any:
N/A
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the
existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Magnuson Street, Schley Boulevard, Wheaton Way (see circulation plan)
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
Yes, the site is currently served by public transit.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
None eliminated.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or
streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private). '
Sidewalk and parking improvements to Schley Boulevard and Magnuson StreeL
New public neighborhood streets within developmenL
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 11
[Chapter 197-1I-WAC- P. 5-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
EV ALUA nON FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally descnbe.
None in the immediate vicinity, however it is anticipated a significant portion of
the population will use the SeattleJBremerton Ferry on a regular basis.
f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Ifknown,
indicate when peak volumes would occur.
3505 vehicle trips per day. Peak volumes will occur between 4pm-6pm.
g, Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Measures will be addressed in traffic impact report.
15. Public services
a, Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire pro-
tection, police protection, healtP. care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
Normal emergency services, health care, and schools woUld be' required for
increased population. '
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None proposed.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse serv-
ice, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: cable communications
b. Descnbe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be
needed.
City of Bremerton: Sanitary Sewer, Water
Cascade Natural Gas: Natural Gas
Telephone: Qwest
Cable TV: Comcast
Puget Sound Energy: Electricity
Refuse Service: Brem-Air Disposal
Trenching as necessary to extend existing utilities into the project site.
c. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead
agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature: ...........".,.....,.......,.....,.................................,....,..,.............,........,............................................. .......,..................,....
Date Submitted: ..,. .........,... ..... ,......, .............. ......... ............... ........... ,... ...,...,...,.. ...... ......;;................ .........,.... ...... ...".
............,
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 12
[Chapter 197-11-W AC - P,5--64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
d. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS' (do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposaL would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general tenus.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro-
duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Storm water runoff from the new roofs and existing and newly constructed
streets will increase flows to. the municipal storm sewer main and will be
discharged to the Port Washington Narrows. Dust and emissions from heavy
equipment will result from construction and automobile emissions will result
from traffic at the site. There is a possibility of limited amounts of asbestos
containing material on t~e site (see the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
Report). Noise levels will change because of this project. Short-term basis:
construction noise during normal business hours. Long-term basis: noise from
traffic and residential activities.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
The stormwater system will be designed and constructed in accordance with the
requirements of the 1992 Puget Sound Stormwater Management Manual Best
Management Practices (BMP's) and City of Bremerton Municipal Code
Chapter 15.04. Low impact design (LID) elements will be used as practical to
reduce the amount of stormwater runoff. Dust will be controlled during the
construction phase by standard construction BMP's. No extraordinary
measures are proposed to reduce automobile emissions. No extraordinary
measures will be required to properly handle and dispose of the anticipated
asbestos material. Noise impacts during construction will be addressed by
limiting construction activities to normal business hours.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Existing brush and weeds will be removed and significant trees will be retained.
Animal trails and habitat will be disturbed or displaced by construction. Fish or
marine life may be affected by increased stormwater flows into the Port
Washington Narrows.
Proposed ~easures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Tree retention,and community green spaces are incorporated into the design plan.
Green streets will provide corridors for wildlife movement oPp<lrtunities between
the western madrona forest and the eastern ravine maple forest. Affects on fish
and marine life will be reduced or mitigated through the stormwater outfall
permitting process with the W A Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, US' Army Corps of
Engineers and the City of Bremerton.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Depletion of energy or natural resources is not anticipated for this project.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Not Applicable
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 13
[Chapter 197-11-W AC - p, 5-64]
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
EVALUATION FOR
AGENCY USE ONLY
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligIble or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands; floodplains, or prime farmlands?
No adverse affects to environmentally sensitive areas are anticipated. Fish and
marine species habitat may be affected by the stprmwater outfall.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
Affects on fish and marine life will be reduced or mitigated through the stonnwater
outfall permitting process with the W A Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, US Army Corps
of Engineers and the City of Bremerton.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatIble with existing plans?
Housing density and land use will be reviewed through the permitting process. No
affects incompatible with existing plans are anticipated.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Shoreline impacts will be reduced or mitigated through' the stonnwater outfall
permitting process with the W A Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, US Army Corps of
Engineers and the City of Bremerton.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
Public transit, water supply, solid waste disposal and sewage service demands are
all expected to increase. '
Proposed measures to reduce orrespond to such demand(s) are:
Public transit and solid waste representatives are included in the stakeholder
process and have inputs to the site. design with respect to transit and solid waste.
Water and sewer service .extensions will be designed using standard methods and
reviewed for proper capacity by the City.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws
or requirements for the protection of the environment
No known conflicts
WAC (5/15/98)
Page 14
[Chapter 197-II-W AC - P. 5-64]
2004 BALD EAGLE TERRITORY
NAME Manette (NEW TERRITORy)
ATTACH A 1:24,000 SCALE MAP SHOWING NEST LOCATIONS
OCCUPANCY I PRODUCTnnTY SURVEY
2
Recommended Dates: April 7 - April 25 Recomri1ended Dates: June 10 - June 25
Earty Season Survey Done by: Scott Ford Late Season Survey Done by:
Reported by: SheRv Ament ~"";'~<i)-V-27&. Reported by:
PlEASE USE CODES SHOlIVNAT BOTIOM OF PAGE TO REPORT DATA IN THE FORM BElOllV.
MARK NEST LOCATIONS ON A MAP ATIACHED TO THIS SHEET. DESCRIBE THE NEST(S)' IN THE SPACE BELOW.
USE EXTRA SHEETS AS NECESSARY.
MONTH DAY #ADULTS BEHAVIOR REPAIR OCCOBS MONTH DAY #ADULTS PRODOBS DEVELOPMENT
0@10~ G 0 DO DDOIIII
DO OITIJ 0 0 DO D OITIIII:
DO OLITJ D D DO D OITTIII=
NEST
1
3
USE THE SPACE BELOW TO:
(1) Describe new nets
(2) Note other cond"rtions, such as occupancy by another species or young pl'E!Sent during earty season survey, that don't fit into the form. .~
When describing 8 nest, include a detailed descriptjon of the nest tree (species, nest hi etc.) as well as the tree's Jocation.
NEW NEST #1
TRS T24N R1E S12SW ofSE
LANDOWNER Private
Description: Live black cottonwood tree located at SW comer of a field to the north of 2217 Winfield Ave, Bremerton. Nest is on westward pointing limb
approximately 15' out from main trunk and 45' above the ground. VISible from street
Notes: Nest is smaR for an eagle nest but adult eagles were sighted in it and there are eagle droppings all around site. Landowner at 2217 WinfiE!ld is Ms. Schwa.
at 360-782..Q642, , ,
: Tree Data:
DBH: 55-
Tree Ht 110'
Location: 47"34,n1' N, 122.36.967'W
NEW NEST #2 TRS
LANDOWNER
NEW NEST #3 TRS
LANDOWNER
Behavior codes: I = Incubating 0 = Defensive P = Perched F = Flying
<<3pair COdes: N = New R = Repaired U = Unrepaired 0 = Destroyed
)CCQBS Codes:
X = Not Checked
..1 = Occupied. Active (breeding attempt confirmed by incubation or eggs)
. = Occupied but Inactive (adults present but NOT incubating/nO eggs)
OccUPied, Activity Unknown (adults present, breeding attempt suspected but not confirmed)
- - Unoccupied
= Occupancy unknown (e,g., no birds present, but nest is new or newly repaired)
Development Codes: 0 = Downy F=Feathered
PRODOBS Codes:
X = Not Checked
o = Unsuccessfu/lNest Empty
1-6 = Number of Young Observed in Nest
7 = Nest Successful, but # Young Unknown
8 = Adults Obstructing VIeW of Nest
9 = Not Located or Destroyed
~~- ...,--..-,:..-
. - - ...
-;t. :'~ ..:-: .,..
l""..': ~= '.-:5:;.r<1:E ~:. ~:: :....:.:'.:.::::
12:: ;::~. :::":1 ~..
'j',':'_= \':;E:5.":j!=~,:-:z. :.::.;:.:.:;:;-'
~:J~\D:" :::2.:;:5.:1[':" ,/'.:
:;:::;. S. D :1:1 \"'.;
2:
"
r.l ,",-.
;'.;!~'i~,
5'~";; Man ette
~ """:,;,...; ,...
--- .'. ".
: (.;.'
.E2
~'l
. '.
I,
. I.-LI
. '("'1'
""I,='I .
, 'lilV
'J I
_ .1 I
. L
\! ~
..
....11
",
. ,j
"-
z
"~l
,'-.
'"
''-.
~.
o
o
J.,.
ro',
K
'"
z
:::'
If:
"-.
'7
/, /;,/ /1"
/
I
I
'"
,\0,'/
~Q-/
~-'
"-~/
,~';-'
F
,
F
z
/~/
F
F
/~->
.' Y
F
.~;
:>
z
a
~,
,
F
ft.. . '.
... ,'. .1:' ~
r .~... Ii ." .
/:~t: ;;;:
(j/ft'
- ~. ./~" "
\ s>.' -r/r/ ,-./1
), _:4:--~"~7( J .~
, -;/. ,'/
.t"
~1 ~
~ 'l..?>
t:;,~
,"
,;
,-
. ~.
'\
..".< 'Ii.
:'"'~~,
...,.
~
-..
-""/
. . .-'
~
--
-'1 {,-.
" v/<'
.::~:':.::~}~:~ d'
l:","
: .;
h-~FID
.
:'L2=:'i';'JCI P'
::-: ~i:. ~: :... : :::
, < - . ~~-. -.;. ~.....:,
, -'- ~'" ,
ll11l.E
,
1011O...
I
,;-..:....,:.
:'27~:,S.~iJ.~ 1:/
oaoRME ATlAs PG 7B 04
USGS QUAD 4712255 BREMERToN EAsT
MANETTE BALD EAGLE TERRITORY (OCCURRENCE 1526)
OllERlrrss /IF PREsENT) sHaw., FOR REFERENCE. SEE REVERSE FOR NAILAIILE HISToRY.
COMPARE THIS MAP TO YOUR PERSONALIREGIONAL FIELD MAP AND REPORT INCONSISTENCIES
6270000 N
6'268000 N
)
o IiOO 1000
~-~
FEEr
IMP 8CAU! 1:1Z,GOD IMP PRO.IE!C1'ION: STAlE PLANE! SOUTH, DATUM: NAD27 CONUS TIC8: UIlIZONE 10T
WIEN ADDRt tEW.l.OCATIONB OR CORRl!c.ThiJ OLD LOCATIONS, PLEA8E'1IARK TO BeALS
FVOU ARE USING A OPe UNrT WlTHTHIS MAP, SETTlE DATUUTO NAD27CONUS
1626-1 UANETTE ,
lAST OCCUPIED; 20040419
4734' 46- 122 36' 58"
T24N Rl1E 812 BALD EAGLE NEST IN lIVE BlACKCOTTOfIMaK) AT E1tN CORNeR OF Rae N. OF2217
f9RD, s. 0CCPR00 SUA IMNFIELD AVE NEST ON WE81WARD POINrJNG UUB ABOUT 16 FT OUT FROU MAIN TRUNK
UTU 628889 E 5269420 N AND 4li FT ABOVE GROUND. VISIBlE FROM STREET. NEST TREE DBH 65", HBeHT 110'.
~.EPORT ERRORS AND RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO: Gretchen Blatz. WDFW. 600 Capitol WavNorth. Olvrnpla. WA98501-1091
.
.:. HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Transportation and Civil Engineering
EAST PARK
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
City of Bremerton. W A
Prepared for: J eff Wegener
Mithun
Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, Ste. 200
Seattle, W A 9810 1
OCTOBER 2005
22]4 Tacoma Road. Puyallup, WA 98371. (253) 770-1401 . Fax (253) 770-1473
EAST PARK
TRAFFiC IMP ACT ANAL YSIS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction.. ...... ............................ ...........,... ...,.......................... ..................................3
II. Project Description....................... ........................................... ........ .............................3
III. Existing Conditions ....................... ............................ .................. .............. ...................3
IV. Future Traffic Conditions....... ....... ......,.......... ............................ ....... ..........................10
V. Conclusions and Mitigation............... ..............................,...................... ,.................. .15
Appendix
LIST OF TABLES
1. Existing Level of Service....... ..... ............ ...... ..................... ..... ............... ......................9
2. Trip Generation. ................. ............... ........ .......,..................... ..............,.......... ...........10
3. Future Level of Service...... ............. ................................ ................ ..... ......... ......... ....11
LIST OF FIGURES
I. Vicinity Map & Roadway System.... .............. ...... ............................ .......... ..................4
2. Site Plan...... .............. ........... ......... ...... ........ ......... ......................................... .................5
3. Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes ....................... ....... ................ .................... ....... .......8
4. Trip Distribution & Assignment..... .......... ............................. .......................... ..........12
5. 2010 PM Peak Hour Volumes Without Project .....................,...................................13
6. 2010 PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project .............. ........ ........................................14
2
EAST PARK
TRAFFIC IMPACt ANAL YSIS
1 INTRODUCTION
This study serves t6 investigate traffic impacts related to the accesses of the proposed
East Park'project. The primary goals of this study concentrate on the assessmentof
existing roadway conditions and intersection congestion, forecasts of newly generated
project traffic, and estimations of future delay. Preliminary tasks include the collection of
roadway information, road improvement information, and peak: hour traffic counts., A
detailed level of service analysis of the existing volumes is then made to determine the
present degree of congestion on the network. Based on this analysis, forecasts of future
traffic levels on the surrounding street system are determined. Following this forecast,
the future service levels for the key intersections are investigated. As a fmal step,
applicable conclusions and possible mitigation measures are defined.
11 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed development consists of 223 single family detached units in front loaded,
alley loaded, carriage unit, and cluster unit configurations, 119 townhomes, 66 luxury
apartment/condominiums, and a 4,000 square foot retail building. This project is a
conversion of the old East Park Naval Reserve, located on ScWey Blvd just south of
Sheridan Rd in the City of Biemerton. Internal roadways will provide access onto ScWey
Blvd. Nearby land uses are primarily residential, with a hospital and two schools located
nearby as well. Figure 1 on the following page shows the site location and roadway map
while Figure 2 shows the site plan and access configuration for the site.
111 EXISTINGCONDITIONS
A. Surrounding Street Network
The street network serving the proposed project consists of a variety of roadways.
Primary streets serving the site are two-lane arterials and multi-lane major arterials.
Characteristics for most roadways vary with respect to lane widths, grades, speeds, and
function. Differences are based on specific roadway designations and proximity to major
employment areas. The major roadways and arterials surrounding the site are listed and
described on page 6.
3
N
~
:;:
z
o
~
l1J
~
SHERIDAN RD
oL
o
<fl
:::l
IL
:2
~
o
.-rrE e>RlOGE
~p..N\:.\:
EAST PARK
HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC
Transportation and Civil Engineering
o
::;
co
G
--'
I:
STONE WAY
l1J
Z
l1J
>
<(
62
oL
LLJ
IL
VICINITY MAP ~ ROADWAY SYSTEM
FIGURE I
N
EAST PARK
mtk.
!~
Townhomn
""""-f
Chntet' HOf'M$
Existmi T~
luxury Apmments(Condos
SITE DATA
OPEN SPACE SUMMARY
-C~~"'F."II'"
-h-anm_Il-\O.rn.l:lL1D_InIn.~_
.~P't9au-~PL."~clPublIC
s.ao.--~s.t.....:I~~Z-
UNIT SUMMARY
-""
. N.... Growtft Ara
.""""'......
.~OpenSpK:e
. Tobl 0,- ""'"
._'-'-'...........,.
-~...................,.
- "'"- """'
-,,"*,_
- T--'-.
- '-"'r "'-/Condo<
.......
-TaulUfHts-
..,a.-,
., .....
..., .....
,..-
1.3SA.aa
.,.,,-
"......
17-'"
.p-
.p.....
n9~
........
...ooosqft
EB
I
-
HEATH & ASSOCIATES INC
Transportation and Civil Engi~eering
SITE PLAN
FIGURE 2
Wheaton Way is a two-lane arterial that borders the south edge of the project. The posted
speed limit is 25 mph across the project site. To the west the road has a north-south
orientation and is designated as SR-303, with a speed limit of 30 mph and multiple lanes.
Lane widths are generally 12 feet, while shoulders are curbed. Grades are rolling.
Schley Boulevard is a north-south, two-lane local road that borders the east edge of the
project. The speed limit is posted at 25 mph, lane widths are 12 feet, and shoulders are
cprb/ gutter/sidewalk.
Callahan Drive is a mostly east-west, two-lane arterial that lies to the north of the project.
This road provides ramp access for northbound SR-303. The posted speed limit is 25
mph, lane widths are 12 feet, and shoulders are curb/gutter/sidewalk.
Sheridan Road is a two-lane, east-west arterial which lies to the north of the site. The
posted speed limit along this roadway is 25 mph, and shoulders are curbed or paved. A
bike lane is also provided. Widening for turn lanes is provided at the intersection with
SR-303.
B. Roadway Improvements
A review of the 2005 to 2010 City of Bremerton Six Year Transportation Improvement
Program indicates several projects scheduled for the area roadways. These projects are
listed and described below:
Warren Avenue (SR-303) Off-ramp from Sheridan Ave to Callahan Dr (Priority #3)
An offramp is to be constructed connecting southbound SR-303 with Callahan Drive.
The project length is 0.14 miles. The total cost is estimated at $920,000 with funding
from the state and local levels.
Wheaton Way from Callahan Dr to Sheridan Rd (Priority #9)
The roadway is to be realigried to a north-south configuration over a length of 0.12 miles.
The cost is listed at $1,405,000 with state and local funding sources.
SR-303 Bremerton to Silverdale Transportation Corridor (Priority #10)
This project is an implementation of the SR-303 corridor study, covering a length of2.8
miles from Burwell St to Riddell. The $100,000 cost is to be met by local sources.
C. Peak Hour V ohunes
Field counts for this study were taken during the evening peak period between the hours
of 4 PM and 6 PM. The PM peak hour was used for analysis purposes since it generally
represents the worst case scenario for most commercial developments with respect to
traffic conditions. This is primarily due to the common 8 AM to 5 PM work schedule and
the greater number of recreation and shopping trips associated with the late afternoon
period. Residents typically return home after work during the same general time period
6
of the day, which results in a natural peak in evening traffic when combined with traffic
oriented toward the project.
Shown in Figure 3 on the following page are the weekday PM peak hour volumes for the
primary intersections of Schley & Wheaton Way, Schley Blvd & Callahan Dr, Olympus
Dr & Sheridan Rd, and SR-303 & Sheridan Rd. ADT volumes for most roadways may be
available from the City of Bremerton.
D. Level of Service Description
Existing peak hour delays were determined using the Highway Capacity Manual.
Capacity analysis is used to determine level of service (LOS) which is an established
measure of congestion for transportation facilities. LOS is defined for a variety of
facilities including intersections, freeways, arterials, etc. A complete definition of level
of service and related criteria can be found in the HCM. The methodology for
determining the LOS at signalized intersections strives to determine the volume to
capacity (vie) ratios for the various intersection movements as well as the average control
delay for those movements. Delay is generally used to measure the degree of driver
discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost time. Control delay, in particular,
includes movements at slower speeds and stops on intersection approaches as vehicles
move up in qiH;~ue position or slow down upstream of an intersection. Aside from the
overall quantity of traffic, three specific factors influence signalized intersection LOS.
These include the type of signal operation provided, the signal phasing pattern, and the
specific allocation of green time.
The methodology for determining the LOS at unsignali;?:ed intersections strives to
determine the potential capacities for the various vehicle movements and ultimately
determines the average total delay for each movement. Total delay is described as the
elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs
from the stop line. Average total delay is simply the mean total delay over the entire
stream. A number of factors influence potential capacity and total delay including the
availability/usefulness of gaps. The range for intersection level of service is LOS A to
LOS F with the former indicating the good conditions and the latter indicating the worst
conditions with heavy control delays. Detailed descriptions of intersection LOS are given
in 'the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Existing LOS is shown in Table 1 on page 9.
Level of service calculations were made using the computer analysis programs known as
Signal 2000 and HCS-2000 which follow signalized and unsignalized analysis procedures
found in the Highway Capacity Manual. Refer to Chapters 16 and 17 of the HCM.
7
N
>-
~
z
o
~
IW
~
37 36 18
46~ + ~27
225-' 8 .- 169
28~ t ~16
SHERIDAN RD
C-'1(&q
11-'11\1
DR
STONE WAY
IW
Z
.u
>
<(
~
QC
IW
[L
20
47f
24~ 8 ~249
EAST PARK
HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC
Transportation and Civil Engineering
l-AI>-.\-lr:r'it. ~~OGt.
18 63 15
,6f + ~IO
59-' 8 ~31
14~t ~7
13 75 10
EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
FIGURE 3
TABLE 1
Existing Level of Service
Intersection Control Geometry LOS Delay
SchleylWheaton Stop Southbound C 17.6
Eastbound A 8.3
Schley/Callahan Stop Northbound B 11.0
Southbound B 10.8
Eastbound A 7.3
Westbound A 7.4
Olympus/Sheridan Stop Northbound C 19.4
Southbound C 15.8
Eastbound A 7.7
Westbound A 7.8
SR-303/Sheridan Signal Southbound C 25.8
Westbound E 60.8
Northbound' D 40.7
Eastbound E 58.0
Overall D 39.4
As shown in the table, existing delays at the key intersections are expected to nin from
LOS A to LOS E. The highest delays presently exist at the westbound and eastbound
approaches on Sheridan at SR-303.
E. Non-Motorist Traffic V olurnes
;<-
Observations for pedestrian and bicycle activities were made at several road segments
serving the site. A moderate amount of non-motorist activity was noted during peak hour
counts and during other visits to the area. Sidewalks and bike lanes/paths are present in
the project vicinity, encouraging non-motorist activity. Based on the location of the
proposed development in relationship to areas which might attract non-motorist traffic,
moderate additional pedestrian and bicycle traffic would be expected along the area
roadways.
F. Transit Service
A review of the Kitsap Transit regional bus schedule indicates three transit service lines
provided near the project site. Routes 21, 25, and 29 run from the Bremerton
Transportation Center to the East Bremerton Transfer Center. Route 25, East Park, also
serves the Harrison Hospital and runs from 6 AM to 8:30 PM. Route 21, Perry Ave, also
serves the Perry Ave Mall and runs from 6AM to 8:30 PM. Route 29, Trenton Ave, also
serves the Perry Ave Mall and runs from 6 AM to 7 PM. To maintain a conservative
approach, no trip reductions are used in forecasting future traffic conditions due to
provided transit service.
9
G. Sight Distance at Access Driveways
An examination of Schley Blvd was made to determine whether adequate entering and
stopping sight distance could be provided for inbound and outbound project traffic. In
accordance with the AASHTO Green Book, a minimum entering sight distance (ESD) of
335 feet is required for a 30 mph design speed. Based on general field reviews, the
access roads should have adequate sight distance onto Schley. Schley has some
horizontal curvature, \1owever the access road intersections are located on the outside of
any curves. The exact location of the accesses is critical in determining whether adequate
sight distance is provided. Final sight distance review would be performed at the time
engineering plans are submitted for review and approval.
IV. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
A. Trip Generation
Trip generation is used to determine the magnitude of project impacts on the surrounding
street system. This is usually denoted by the specific numb'er of trips, which enter or exit
a site during a designated time period. Generation data was taken from the well-known
Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation, Seventh Edition. The
specific land uses for this site were Single Family Detached Housing (LUC 210) for the
single family units, Residential CondorniniumITownhouse (LUC 230) for tbetownhouse
and luxury apartment/condominium uruts, and Specialty Retail Center (LUC 814).
Regression equations were chosen for. the residential land uses, while ITE average rates
were chosen for the retail center. Table 2 shown below gives a summary of project
traffic. Average Daily Traffic and AM and PM peak hour volumes are given.
TABLE 2
Trip Generation
223 units 185 units 4000fr
,.". Single Fam Condo/Twnhse Spec Retail Total
AWDT 2175 1083 177 3435
AM Peak Enter 42 14 0 56
AM Peak Exit 124 70 0 194
AM Total 166 84 0 250
PM Peak Enter 139 67 5 211
PM Peak Exit 82 33 6 121
PM Total 221 100 11 332
10
B. Trip Assignment and Distribution
The destination and origination of future project traffic primarily dictates how trips will
disperse at nearby intersections. Trips generated by the project are expected to follow the
general pattern shown in Figure 4. This distribution is based on the existing roadway
network. Future improvements such as the SR-303 southbound ramps onto Callahan
would be expected to shift some inbound volumes from Sheridan to Callahan.
C. Future Traffic Volumes
The owners of the project anticipate a completion date for the build out of this project by
2010. Future 2010 traffic volumes without the project were derived by applying a3
percent annual growth rate to the volumes of Figure 3. 2010 intersection volumes
without the project are given in Figure 5 while 2010 volumes with project traffic included
are shown in Figure 6.
D. Future Level of Service
The results of the future level of service analysis are given in Table 3 shown below.
These results were again determined using the intersection analysis programs Signal 2000
and HCS-2000.
TABLE 3
Future 2010 Level of Service
Delays given in seconds per vehicle
Without Proiect With Proiect
Intersection Control Geometry LOS Delay LOS Delay
Schley/Wheaton Stop Southbound C 22.4 F 54.9
Eastbound A 8.6 A 9.1
Schley/Wheaton (imp) Stop Southbound E 39.7
Eastbound L T A 9.1
Schley/Callahan Stop Northbound B 11.6 B 14.9
Southbound B 11.3 B 13.6
Eastbound A 7.3 A 7.3
Westbound A 7.4 A 7.4
Olympus/Sheridan Stop Northbound D 26.7 E 35.6
Southbound C 19.7 D 25.3
Eastbound A 7.8 A 7.8
Westbound A 7.9 A 8.3
SR-303/Sheridan Signal Southbound C 25.9 D 36.6
Westbound F 107.7 F 116.2,
Northbound D 52.6 E 59.4
Eastbound F 95.0 F 98.3
Overall D 53.2 E 61.0
11
o 0 0
30% of . '-0
0-' 8 '-0
N ~ 84~ trF21 10%
~
z
0
~
lU
~
10% SHERIDAN RD
15%
18 42
32f '-74
~ 8 '-0
PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS
INBOUND; 2 I I VPH
OUTBOUND: 12 I VPH
EAST PARK
......+...... HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC
V+V Transportation and Civil Engineering
~t ,,\<.lOGe
~p..I'I\:.\'
30%
STONE WAY
lU
Z
lU
~
&!
0<
lU
[L
5%
TRIP DISTRIBUTION *- ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE 4
N
43 42 21
53f . ~31
2GI___ 8 '-1%
32~ t ~I~
C<'
o
If)
::l
(L
:2
~
o
>-
~
z
o
~
u.J
:r:
:?;
SHERIDAN RD
43 IOG~ 157
50f . ~IGI
58___ ~
17~~ t ~227
1 ~5 1 77~ 234
C-'li&!
0'-'lt\t
D",
crt'C eRlOG'C
MI>.N\:. \ ~
J.'-
EAST PARK
A+A HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC
V+V Transportation and Civil Engineering
STONE WAY
u.J
Z
u.J
>
<{
~
C<'
u.J
(L
21 73 17
I~f . ~'2
G~ 8 '-3G
IG~ t ~8
15 87 12
20 I 0 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT
fiGURE 5
N
~
:s'
z
o
~
UJ
~
SHERIDAN RD
43 1069 220
50~ + ~161
79~ ~ '--67
179~ t ~227
2071816 234
C"1~&1
ir"lt\!
DR
STONE WAY
21 178 17
19~ + ~12
68-' 8 '--36
~ 16~ t rF8
UJ
>
-<
~
UJ
(L
41
cM"E e~OGE
,,-^Jl.-1'<.., ~
EAST PARK
A+A HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC
V+V Transportation and Civil Engineering
20 I 0 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME5 WITH PROJECT
FIGURE b
The intersections of Schley & Wheaton was analyzed with an eastbound left turn lane in
place under future conditions with project traffic, as the lane would be warranted (see
,Section E below). However, delays would still be expected to be heavy at LOS F. In
order to improve delays, the improvements of separate southbound turn lanes were
analyzed. With these additional turning lanes in place, southbound delays should drop to
LOS E. Northbound delays on Olympus at Sheridan may drop to LOS E with East Park
traffic added. However, with the SR-303 southbound ramp at Callahan TIP project, East
Park inboun~ trips would likely reroute, on Callahan instead of Sheridan. In this case,
delays at Olympus & Sheridan should be below the LOS E level. Future delays at the
SR-303 & Sheridan are expected to increase to the LOS D to LOS F level.
E. Left Turn Lane Warrants
Forthis impact study, procedures described by the WSDOT Design Manual were used to
ascertain left turn lane requirements on Wheaton Way at Schley. The results of this
assessment indicate that a left turn lane would be needed (it this location. A summary of
the results with the applicable nomograph is given in the appendix. Also refer to the
WSDOT Design Manual for detailed descriptions of the methods used.
F. MUTCD Signal Warrants
A signal warrant analysis based on the 2003 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD) was performed for the Schley & Wheaton intersection. Specifically, Warrant
3 was considered for 2010 volumes with the project included. Based on the analysis, a
signal would not be warranted, although the warrant would be close to being met based
on a configuration with an eastbound left turn lane added. The proposed mitigation of
separate southbound turn lanes an.d a westbound right turn lane would further reduce
delays and keep warrants further from being met. An analysis was also made for the
Olympus & Wheaton intersection. As with the Schley & Wheaton intersection, some
conditions were satisfied for Warrant 3 but not enough for the warrant to be met. The
analyses ,and applicable spreadsheets and data can be found in the appendix.
V CONCLUSIONS AND MITIGATION
The East Park project, located on Schley Blvd north of Wheaton Way and south of
Callahan Drive, consists of223 single family units, 185 condorniniumltownhouseunits,
and a 4,000 square foot specialty retail building. Roughly 3435 daily trips would be
created on a typical weekday of which approximately 332 trips are expected into and out
of the site during the PM peak hour. During the AM peak hour, 250 total trips are
expected to be generated. Heavy traffic volumes currently exist on the SR-303 corridor,
with low to heavy delays for the key intersections.
Future delay conditions in the area are outlined in Table 3. Based on the LOS analysis
results, the intersections studied are expected to have some increases in delays due to
15
project traffic. High southbound delays at the ScWey & Wheaton Way intersection can be
reduced to LOS E with the addition of an eastbound left turn lane and separate
southbound turn lanes. The LOS E northbound delays at Olympus & Sheridan would be
reduced upon completion of the SR-303 southbound ramp at Callahan (see the Roadway
Improvements section). MUTCD Signal Warrant 3 would not be met at the Schley &
Wheaton intersection or the Olympus & Sheridan intersection by the 2010 horizon year.
WSDOT left turn lane warrants would be met for Wheaton Way at Schley.
Based on the above, proposed mitigations are listed below:
1. Construct an eastbound left turn lane plus taper on Wheaton Way at ScWey Blvd.
Also construct separate southbound left turn and right turn lanes on Schley Blvd at
Wheaton Way. Construction should be to Bremerton standards. '
2. If required, provide pro-rata share contribution to the area TIP projects directly
impacted by East Park traffic. These projects include SR-303 improvements, the SR-
303 southbound ramp at Callahan Drive, and the Wheaton Way improvements.
No other mitigations are identified at this time.
16
EAST PARK
TRAFFIC IMP ACT ANAL YSIS
APPENDIX
17
LEVEL OF SERVICE
The following are excerpts from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual - Transportation
Research Board Special Report 209.
Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions
within a traffic stream. Level of service (LOS) is a quality measUre describing
operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally interms of such service measures
as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and
convenience.
Six LOS are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available.
Letters designate each level, from A toF, with LOS A~representing the best operating
conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range ,of operating
conditions and the driver's perception of those conditions.
Level-of-Service definitions
The following definitions generally define the various levels of service for arterials.
Level of service A represents primarily free-flow operations at average travel speeds,
usually about 90 percent of the free-flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles are
seldom impeded in their ability to maneuver in the traffic stream. Delay at signalized
intersections is minimal.
Level of service B represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds,
usually about 70 percent of the free-flow speed for the arterial classification. The ability
to maneuver in the traffic stream is only slightly restriCted and delays are not bothersome.
Level of service C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change
lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues,
adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of
about 50 percent of the average free-flow speed for the arterial classification.
Level of service D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause
substantial increases in approach delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D may
be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some
combination of these. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free-flow speed.
Level of service E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of one-
third the free-flow speed or less. Such operations are caused by some combination of
adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical
intersections, and inappropriate signal timing.
18
Level of serviceF characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds, from less than one-
third to one-quarter of the free-flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical
signalized locations, with long delays and extensive queuing.
These definitions are general and conceptual in nature, and they apply primarily to
uninterrupted flow. Levels of serVice for interrupted flow facilities vary widely in terms
of both the user's perception of service quality and the operational variables used to
describe them.
For each type of facility, levels of service are defined based on one or more operational
parameters that best describe operating quality for the subject facility type. While the
concept of level of service attempts to address a Wide-range of operating conditions,
limitations on data collection and availability make it impractical to treat the full range of
operational parameters for every type of facility. The parameters selected to define levels
of service for each facility type are called "measures of effectiveness" or "MOE's", and
represent available measures that best describe the quality of operation on the. subj ect
facility type.
Each level of service represents a range of conditions, as defined by a range in the
parameters given. Thus, a level of service is not a discrete condition, but rather a range of
conditions for which boundaries are established.
The following tables describe levels of service for signalized and unsignalized
intersections. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of average
control delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and
lost travel time, as well as time from movements at slower speeds and stops on
intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of
an intersection. Level of service for unsignalized intersections is determined by the
computed or measured control delay and is determined for each minor movement.
Signalized Intersections - Level of Service -
Level of Service
A
B
C
D
E
F
Control Delay per
Vehicle (sec)
:$;10
> 10 and <20
> 20 and :535
> 35 and <55
> 55 and :580
>80
19
Unsignalized Intersections - Level of Service
Level of Service
A
B
C
D
E
F
Average Total Delay
per Vehicle (sec)
:5;;10
> 10 and :5;; 15
> 15 and :5;;25
> 251 and $35
> 35 and :5;;50
>50
As described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, level of service breakpoints for all-
way stop controlled (A WSC) intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used
for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect
different levels of performance from distinct kinds of transportation facilities. The
expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry highertraffic volumes'
than an A WSC intersection. Thus a higher level of control delay is acceptable at a
signalized intersection for the same level of service.
A WSC Intersections - Level of Service
Level of Service
A
B
C
D
E
F
. 20
Average Total Delay
per Vehicle (see)
:5;;10
> 10 and :5;; 15
> 15 and $25
> 25 and :5;;35
> 35 and :5;;50
>50
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
For 223 Dwelling Units of Single Family Detached Housing
October 24, 2005
Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume
7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter
7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit
7-9 AM Peak Hour Total
4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter
4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hour Total
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
Saturday 2-Way Volume
Saturday Peak Hour Enter
Saturday Peak Hour Exit
Saturday Peak Hour Total
Sunday 2-Way Volume
Sunday Peak Hour Enter
Sunday Peak Hour Exit
Sunday Peak Hour Total
Average
Rate
Standard'
Deviation
Adjustment
Factor
9.75
0.19
0.56
OJ74
0.62
0.37
0.99
0.20
0.56
0.75
0.65
0.37
1. 02
10.03
0.51
0.43
0.94
8.79
0.45
0.40
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1. 00
1. 00
1.,00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
LOa
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
The above rates were calculated from these equations:
24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = .92LN(X) + 2.71, R^2 0.96
7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: T = .7 (X) + 9.43
R^2 = 0.89 , 0.25 Enter, 0.75 Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = .9LN(X) + .53
R^2 0.91 , 0.63 En t e r , 0.37 Exit
AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: T = .7 (X) + 12.05
R^2 0.89 , 0.26 Enter, 0.74 Exit
PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) .89LN(X) + .61
R^2 = 0.91 , 0.64 Enter, 0.36 Exit
Sat. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) .94LN(X) + 2.63, R^2 = 0.93
.~:-- Sat. Pk Hr. Total: T = .89 (X) + 10.93
R^2 = 0.9 , 0.54 Enter, 0.46 Exit
Sun. 2-Way Volume: T = 8.83(X) + -9.76, R^2 = 0.94
Sun. Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) .89LN(X) + .44
R^2 = 0.88 , 0.53 Enter, 0.47 Exit
Driveway
Volume
2175
-4-:l: 1.12
124
166
139
82
221
44
12-4
168
145
82
226
2237
113
96
209
1959
101
90
191
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 7th Edition, 2003.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
For 185 Dwelling Units of Residential Condominium / Townhouse
October 24, 2005
Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume
7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter
7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit
7-9 AM1Peak Hour Total
4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter
4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hour Total
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
Saturday 2-Way Volume
Saturday Peak Hour Enter
Saturday Peak Hour Exit
Saturday Peak Hour Total
Sunday 2-Way Volume
Sunday Peak Hour Enter
Sunday Peak Hour Exit
Sunday Peak Hour Total
Average Standard
Rate Deviation
Adjustment
Factor
5.85
0.08
0.38
0.46
0.36
0.18
0.54
0.08
0.38
0.46
0.35
0.20
0.55
5.93
0.28
0.24
0.52
5.06
0.25
0.26
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
cl. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
The above rates were calculated from these equations:
24-Hr. 2-Way Volume:
7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total:
4-6 PM Feak Hr. Total:
AM Gen Pk Hr. Total:
PM Gen Pk Hr. Total:
Sat. 2-WayVolume:
Sat. Pk Hr. Total:
Sun. 2-Way Volume:
Sun. Pk Hr. Total:
LN(T)
LN(T)
, R^2 =
LN(T)
R^2 =
LN(T)
R^2
T =
R^2
T =
T =
R^2
T =
T =
R^2
.85LN(X) + 2.55, R^2 0.83
. 8 LN (X) + . 2 6
0.76, 0.17 Enter, 0.83 Exit
. 82 LN (X) + . 32
0.8, 0.67 Enter, 0.33 Exit
.82LN(X) + .17
0.8, 0.18 Enter, 0.82 Exit
,_34 (X) + 38.31
0.83, 0.64 Enter, 0.36 Exit
3.62(X) + 427.93, R^2 0.84
.29(X) + 42.63
0.84, 0.54 Enter, 0.46 Exit
3.13(X) + 357.26, R^2 0.88
.23(X) + 50.01
0.78 0.49 Enter, 0.51 Exit
Driveway
Volume
1083
14
70
84
67
33
100
15
70
86
65
36
101
1098
52
44
96
936
45
47
93
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 7th Edition, 2003.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
For 4 T.G.L.A. of Specialty Retail Center
October 24, 2005
Average
Rate
Standard
Deviation
Adjustment
Factor
Driveway
Volume
Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume
7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter
7-,9 AM Peak Hour Exit
7-9 AM Peak Hour Total
4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter
4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hour Total
AM PkHr, Generator, Enter
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit
PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total
Saturday 2-Way Volume
Saturday Peak Hour Enter
Saturday Peak Hour Exit
Saturday Peak Hour Total
Sunday 2-Way Volume
Sunday Peak Hour Enter
Sunday Peak Hour Exit
Sunday Peak Hour Total
44.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.19
1. 52
2.71
3.28
3.56
6.84
2.81
2.21
5.02
42.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
20.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1. 83
0.00
0.00
3.55
0.00
0.00
2.31
13.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
1. 00
177
o
o
o
5
6
11
13
14
27
11
9
20
168
o
o
o
82
o
o
o
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 7th Edition, 2003.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
Heath & Associates Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: untitled4
: 00002462
: 08/25/2005
: 1
Groups Printed- Unshifted
MAGNUSON WAY WHEATON WAY WHEATON WAY
Southbound Westbound Eastbound
Start Time Riqht I Thru I Left Riqht I Thru I Left Riqht I Thru I Left Inl Totall
Factor 1,0 I 1.0 I 1,0 1.0 I 1,0 I 1.0 1.0 I 1.0 I 1.0 l
04:00 PM 3 0 3 16 84 0 0 61 3 170
04:15 PM 10 0 15 9 100 0 0 49 1 8 191
04:30 PM 2 0 12 13 46 0 0 42 8 123
04:45 PM 4 0 9 17 42 0 0 73 20 165
Total 19 0 39 55 272 0 0 225 39 649
05:00 PM 4 0 12 21 61 0 0 76 11 185
05:15 PM 6 0 10 15 58 0 0 59 5 153
05:30 PM 6 0 13 12 44 0 0 53 10 138
05:45 PM 3 0 13 13 38 0 0 63 9 139
Total 19 0 48 61 201 0 0 251 35 615
Grand Total 38 0 871 116 473 o,g 1 0 476 741 1264
Apprch % 30.4 0.0 69.6 19,7 80,3 0,0 86,5 13.5
Total % 3,0 0.0 6.9 9,2 37.4 0.0 0.0 37,7 5,9
NU ONWAY
Out In Total
I '''~ "'I
3B B7
:1ht Left
4
ro~ T ~o
~~ u~s~
~~5 North
:s: 0
5E:g ~ :T~
-'"
5/2005 4:00:00 PM ",-
I- ft) ",::J
~ ~ ~---. 512005 5:45:00 PM f--~ ./>0 ft)
~s~ I- 2~ ~-1~
Unshlfted
" 0'" ~o
l(;iiL
Start Time Right Thru Left :6~i
Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Intersection 04:15 PM
Volume 20 0 48 68
Percent 29,4 0.0 70,6
04:15 Volume 10 0 15 25
Peak Factor
High Int. 04:15 PM
Volume 10 0 15 25
Peak Factor 0,680
Heath & Associates Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
-~ ~~~
lU", i
a'"
t-
o<( ~~j North
,,,"
E~ ...J
0 25/20054:15:00 PM o=>
~~-. 512005 5:00:00 PM f--;! <0
~~ t- 2~ ~
Unshifted ,-I
0'" ",9-
, <0 III
...,-
~;:
..
.,.
: untitled4
: 00002462
: 08/25/2005
:2
Heath & Associates Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : untitled2
Site Code : 00002462
Start Date : 09/15/2005
Page No : 1
Start Time Left Left Left Left Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
04:00 PM 2 2 7 3 87
04;15 PM 2 2 4 5 79
04:30 PM 1 3 1 6 5 77
04:45 PM 3 1 3 3 80
Total 10 6 20 16 323
05:00 PM 5 16 2 3 7 3 5 23 3 5 9 3 84
05:15 PM 6 11 3 4 9 0 0 23 2 5 17 6 86
05:30 PM 3 20 7 3 4 3 2 14 5 2 14 4 81
05:45 PM 3 17 1 1 2 0 0 10 6 4 7 1 52
Total 17 64 13 11 22 .6 7 70 16 16 47 14 303
Grand Total 31 132 231 19 48 121 17 134 361 36 108 30 I 626
Apprch % 16,7 71,0 12.4 24.1 60,8 15.2 9.1 71,7 19.3 20,7 62,1 17.2
Total % 5,0 21,1 3.7 3,0 7.7 1,9 2.7 21.4 5,8 5.8 17.3 4.8
23
Left.
4
-B
"''''
ON
I-
a::
o
z ...
<(ct::
J:-
~
;i. ~
()~~
o~
g'iiJ
-'
i
North
u
;:r~
-co
~o
..s.
CD
"'"
;:!1:---+
I-
/15/2005 4:00:00 PM
15/2Q05 5:45:00 PM
-l
"'-2' ..
CD
...5'
CD
CD_
M-C
h
Unshifled
r-
+!!.~
o~
~I!!.
Heath & Associates Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
File Name : untitled2
Site Code : 00002462
Start Date ": 09/15/2005
Page No : 2
Start Time App, App, App, Int.
Total Total Total Total
15 96 10 31 7 48 10 75 13 98 14 59 16 89 331
15,6 20.8 64.6 14,6 10,2 76.5 13.3 15,7 66,3 18.0
3 20 4 9 0 13 0 23 2 25 5 17 6 28 86
0.962
05:30 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM
3 20 7 30 3 7 3 13 5 23 3 31 5 17 6 28
0,800 0,923 0,790 0,795
~ i....1 T U
....J North ::r~
-0
Ol -l
U') 2---. /1512005 4:45:00 PM '-2~
~ /1512005 5:30:00 PM
...-
~..c: r- ~-l~
n Unshlfted ~~....
w~
"'-
Heath & Associates Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: untitled2
: 00002462
: 08/23/2005
: 1
rouDs nnte - Uns ed
OL YMPUS DR SHERIDAN RD OL YMPUS DR SHERIDAN RD
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Start Time Riaht I Thru I Left Riaht I Thru I Left RlohtT Thru I Left Riaht I Thru I Left Int. Totall
Factor 1,0 I 1.0 I 1,0 1.0 I 1.0 I 1,0 1,0 I 1,0 I 1.0 1.0 I 1.01 1,0 I
04:00 PM 12 16 4 8 40 7 7 26 5 7 51 7 190
04:15 PM 3 7 5 8 45 3 1 15 11 8 63 13 182
04:30 PM 13 7 7 6 45 3 3 11 1 6 56 10 168
04:45 PM 9 6 2 5 39 3 4 8 5 7 55 16 159
Total 37 36 18 27 169 16 15 60 22 28 225 46 699
G
P' d
hift
05:00 PM 10 11 3 7 50 5 2 11 4 12 57 11 183
05:15 PM 6 8 4 5 48 4 3 12 10 8. 60 5 173
05:30 PM 3 10 6 3 44 3 3 11 6 2 44 7 142
05:45 PM 8 8 5 7 37 4 2 10 4 6 41 9 141
Total 27 37 18 22 179 16 10 44 24 28 202 32 639
Grand Total 64 73 361 49 348 321 25 104 461 56 427 781 1338
Apprch % 37.0 42,2 20,8 11.4 81.1 7,5 14,3 59.4 26.3 10.0 76.1 13,9
Total % 4,8 5,5 2.7 3.7 26,0 2.4 1.9 7.8 3.4 4,2 31,9 5,8
-~
"'~ i
'00 ~\ij
I--~ U
..J North :7'"
- <D
... -l
N 2----.
"<t{3. 312005 4:00:00 PM ~:7~
312005 5:45:00 PM 20>
<D_
",,C Unshifled ....
n ..r-~ w
, '"
:.,,\
Heath & ASsociates Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: untitled2
: 00002462
: 08/23/2005
:2
Start Time App, App. Right App, Right App, Int.
Total Total Total Total
1
18 91 27 169 16 212 15 60 22 97 28 225 46 299 699
19,8 12,7 79.7 7.5 15,5 61,9 22,7 9.4 75,3 15.4
4 32 8 40 7 55 7 26 5 38 7 51 7 65 190
0,920
04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM
12 16 4 32 8 45 3 56 7 26 5 38 8 63 13 84
0,711 0.946 0,638 0.890
" ~,
-~
01", i
15'" ~'\iJ
~ U
a -' North ::TI\l
-...,
'" -l
gj ~-. 2312005 4:00:00 PM ,-,-::T ~
~ ~ 2312005 4:45:00 PM 2m
<D
W
I ~ CXl_
"'.<: r-
cn_", h Unshifled +~m
6'"
Heath & Associates Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : untitled 3
Site Code : 00002462
Start Date : 08/24/2005
Page No : 1
Start Time Left Left Left Left Int. Total
Factor 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0
D4J;00 PM 48 49 45 6 900
04:15 PM 32 42 44 10 933
04:30 PM 36 49 45 12 907
04:45 PM 34 42 47 13 847
Total 150 182 181 41 3587
05:00 PM 11 260 33 49 15 63 45 382 32 43, 11 8 952
05:15 PM 11 234 35 39 16 57 50 353, 43 40 17 11 906
05:30 PM 8 258 36 35 17 43 34 320 30 41 14 11 847
05:45 PM 11 241 34 23 13 58 36 276 26 36 11 14 779
Total 41 993 138 146 61 221 165 1331 131 160 53 44 3484
Grand Total 72 1898 2881 269 118 4031 373 2844 3121 302 107 851 7071
Apprch % 3,2 84.1 12.8 34,1 14,9 51.0 10,6 80.6 8,8 61,1 21.7 17,2
Total % 1,0 26,8 4,1 3,8 1,7 5.7 5,3 40,2 4.4 4,3 1,5 1.2
-~
01", T
a'" :2 ~--1' ~o
t- U'" ",5-
...J North :T'" 0> en
-<0 I
m
..... -l ::u
~ ~---. 2412005 4:00:00 PM +--:T ~ ""-
t- 4/2005 5:45:00 PM 2~ :g=>)>
0>
gE Unshifted r- ~~o
"'n ,r-~ S
g;1l!.
Heath & ASsoCiates Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
File Name
Site Code
Start Date
Page No
: untitled3
: 00002462
: 08/24/2005
:2
App, App, Right App, App, In!.
Total Total Total Total
135 1094 139 58 196 393 202 1535 168 1905 154 50 43 247 3639
12.3 35.4 14,8 49,9 10,6 80,6 8,8 62,3 20,2 17.4
33 304 49 15 63 127 45 382 32 459 43 11 8 62 952
0,956
05:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM
11 260 33 304 49 15 63 127 ' 43 442 44 529 44 15 12 71
0,900 0.774 0,900 - 0,870
-~
I\l~ T
15'" ~~-1 ~o
I- U~ o>!i
0 ...J North ;;r(,o) ..... en
ct: -co
.....
~E~ 0 ~
'" ~--. 2412005 4:15:00 PM f--2 '" (,0)-
e:: I- 24/2005 5:00:00 PM 0> ~j>
W
I ~~ ;Jl;:E ;- ;U
~n Unshlfled ..r- co ~ ~~o
0'" =so co
m ~~
0-
~
Left
168
I 12721
Out
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Information Site Information
nalvst Intersection Schley/Magnuson & Wheaton
\aencv/Co. Way
urisdiction
ate Performed ~. nalvsis Year
nalvsis Time Period
,
Proiect Descriotion EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EastNVest Street: Wheaton Way INorth/South Street: Schley BlvdlMagnuson Way
Intersection Orientation: East-West !study Period (hrs): 0,25 1
rYehicle Volumes and Adjustments
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
olume (veh/h) 47 240 0 0 249 60
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,77 0.77 1,00 1.00 0.71 0.71
Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 61 311 0 0 350 84
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 - - 0 - --
PHV
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Uostream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
[volume (vehlh) 0 0 0 48 0 20
Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.68 1,00 0,68
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 70 0 29
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHV
Percent grade (%) . 0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 O'
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
Control Delav, Queue Len th, Level of Service
A.pproach , EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
!volume, v (vph) 61 99
Capacity, Cm (vph) 1136 383
!v/c ratio 0,05 0,26
Ioueue length (95%) 0.17 1.02
Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 17.6
LOS A C
!Approach delay (s/veh) - - 1.7.6
!Approach LOS -- - C
HCS200()Th<
CopYright (:) 2003 Unlver~Hty of Florida, All Rights Reserved
VersIOn 4 I d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
General Infonnation ite Infonnation
IAnalvst Intersection Schley/Magnuson & Wheaton
lAaencv/Co. Way
urisdiction
Date Performed nalysis Year
!Analysis Time Period
Proiect Descriotion 2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT
EastMIest Street: Wheaton Wav North/South Street: Schley Blvd/Maanuson Way
Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period Ihrs): 0,25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjusbnents
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 , 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume Ivehlh) 54 278 0 0 289 70
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.77 0,77 1,00 1.00 0.71 0,71
Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 70 361 0 0 407 98
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 - 0 - -
PHV -
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LT TR
Uostream Sianal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 56 0 23
Peak-hour factor, PHF 1,00 1,00 1,00 , 0.68 1,00 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 0 0 0 82 0 33
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHV
Percent grade (%) 0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration LR
!Control Delav Queue Len th, Level of Service
fA.pproach EB WB Northbound Southbqund
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LT LR
Volume, v (vph) 70 115
Capacity, Cm (vph) 1070 320
v/c ratio 0,07 0,36
Queue length (95%) 0.21 1.58
Control Delay (slveh) 8,6 22.4
LOS A C
A.pproach delay (s/veh) - - 22.4
A.pproach LOS - - C
HCS200(JTM
COPYright 0 2003 University of Florida, All RIghts Reserved
VersIon 4 ld
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROl- SUMMARY
lGenerallnfonnation site Infonnation
nalvst Intersection SchleylMagnuson & Wheaton
~aencv/Co. Way
ate Perfonned urisdiction
nalvsis Time Period nalysis Year
,
Proiect Description 2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH PROJECT "" IT 1-1 €$ L T L.A ~ (~(t(VIR.D)
EastlWest Street: Wheaton Wav INorth/South Street: Schlev BlvdlMaanuson Way
Intersection Orientation: EEist-West !Study Periodlhrs\: 0,25
Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume -(veh/h) 86 278 0 0 289 144
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,77 0,77 1.00 1,00 0.71 0.71
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 111 361 0 0 407 202
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 - 0 -
PHV - -
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration L T TR
Upstream Sienal , 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume(veh/h) 0 0 0 98 0 41
Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1,00 1.00 0,68 1.00 0.68
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 144 0 60
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHV
Percent grade (%) 0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized? 0 -:- 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0
Configuration . , LR
Control Delav. Queue Len th Level of Service
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 , 11 12
Lane Configuration L LR
Volume, v (vph) 111 204
Capacity, Co, (vph) 979 261
Ic ratio 0,11 0,78
Queue length (95%) 0,38 5.88
Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 54.9 <'"
LOS A F
~pproach delay (slveh) - - 54.9
~pproach LOS - -- F
HCS]OO(}'TM
Copynght 0 2003 UniversIty ofFJorida, All Rights Reserved
Verslon41d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
-
General Information Site Information
nalvst Intersection Schley /Magnuson & Wheaton
Way
~aencv/Co, urisdiction
ate Performed natYsis Year
nalvsis Time Period ,
Proiect Description 2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH PROJECT wI E6 LT. 58 I.T -t; RT l-ANE5
EastNVest Street: Wheaton Way INorth/South Street: Schlev BlvdlMaanuson Way
Intersection Orientation: East-West /Studv Period Ihrsl: 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments '
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 86 278 0 0 289 144
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.77 0,77 1.00 1,00 0.71 0,71
Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 111 361 0 0 407 202
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0
PHV - - - -
Median type Undivided
RT Channeiized? 0 0
Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration L T TR
Uostream Sianal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 98 0 41
Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 1,00 0,68
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 144 0 60
, Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHV
Percent grade (%) 0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes b 0 0 1 0 1
Configuration L R
Control Delav. Queue Len th Level of Service ,
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration L L R
Volume, v (vph) 111 144 60
apacity, Cm (vph) 979 213 569
!v/c ratio 0.11 0.68 0.11
Queue length (95%) 0.38 4.21 0.35
Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 51,3 12. (>
LOS A F B
Approach delay (s/veh) - -- 39.7
Approach LOS -- - E
HCSJOOflfM
Copynght 0 2003 University ofFlonda, All RIghts Reserved
Vemon4ld
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
enerallnformation Site Information
nalvst Intersection Schley Blvd & Callahan Of
~aencv/Co. !Jurisdiction
ate Performed , !Analvsis Year
nalvsis Time Period
Proiect Description EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ,
EastMIest Street: Callahan Drive INorth/South Street: Schlev Blvd
Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudv Periodlhrs): 0,25
Vehicle Volumes al7ld Adiustments
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement ' 1 2 3 4 5 6
L .T R L T R
Volume (vehlh) 16 59 ' 14 7 31 10
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,80 0,80 0,80 0,92 0.92 0,92
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 19 73 17 7 33 10
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 - 0 -
PHV - -
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration , LTR . LTR
Upstream SiQnal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 13 75 10 15 63 18
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 0,79 0,80 0,80 0.80
Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 16 94 12 18 78 22
Proportion of heavy vehicles, ,
PHV 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent grade (%) 0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized? 0 0
ILanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Control Delav . Queue Len th level of Service
Approach EB , WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
Volume, v (vph) 19 7 122 118
Capacity, Cm (vph) 1579 1518 719 739
/c ratio 0,01 0,00 0.17 0.16
Queue length (95%) 0,04 0,01 0,61 0,57
Control Delay (s/veh) 7,3 7.4 11,0 10,8
LOS A A B B
lto-pproach delay (slveh) - - 11.0 10,8
Approach LOS - - B B
HCS200(JTM
Copynght 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
Version 4 I d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
Generallnfonnation Sife lofonnation
IAnalvst Intersection SchlevBlvd & Callahan Dr
!Aaencv/Co, !Jurisdiction
Date Performed !Analysis Year.
!Analysis Time Period ,
Proiect Descriotion 2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT ' '
EastlWest Street: Callahan Drive INorth/South Street: Schlev Blvd
Intersection Orientation': East-West , !Studv Period (hrs \: 0:25
!Vehicle Volumes and AdiusbnentS
Maior Street Eastbound, Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Wolurne (vehlh) 19 68 16 '" 8 36 12
Peak"hour factor, PHF 0,80 0,80 0,80 0,92 0,92 0,92
Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 23 84 ,19 8 39 13
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0 -
PHV - - - -
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized? 0 , 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Uostream Sienal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
!Volume (veh/h) 15 87 12 17 73 21
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 0,79 0,80 0,80 0,80
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 18 110 15 21 91 26
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHV
Percent grade (%) 0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0 ,
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
8onfiguration LTR LTR
Control Delav, Queue Len th Level of Service
A.pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
!volume, v (vph) 23 8 143 138
Capacity, c", (vph) 1567 1502 688 705
[-..t/c ratio 0,01 0,01 0,21 0.20
Queue length (95%) 0.04 0,02 ' 0.78 0.72
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.3 7.4 11.6 11.3
LOS A A B B
Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 11.6 11,3
Approach 'LOS - -- B B
HCSIOOOTM
COPYright C 2003 UOlverslty of Florida, All Rights Reserved
VersIon 4 Id
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
eneral Information Site Information
nalvst Intersection Schley Blvd & Callahan Dr
~aencv/Co, urisdiction
Date Performed 'Analysis Year
!Analvsis Time Period
Proiect Descriotion 2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES, W/TH PROJECT
EasllWest Street: Callahan Drive North/South Street: Sch/ev Blvd
IntersectianOrientation: East-West !Studv Period Ihrs\: 0,25
Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume Ivehlh) 19 68 16 8 36 12
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,80 0,80 0.80 ' 0,92 0,92 0,92
Hourly Flaw Rate (veh/h) 23 84 19 8 39 13
Proportion af heavy vehicles, 0 - - 0 - -
PHV
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 , 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR . LTR ,
Upstream Sional 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume Iveh/h) 64 99 12 17 178 21
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.79 0.79 0,79 0.80 0,80 ,0,80
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 81 . 125 15 21 222 26
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHV
Percent grade (%) 0 0 -,-
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized? 0 0
anes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Control Delav. Queue Len th Level of SerVice
Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
Volume, v (vph) 23 8 221 269
Capacity, Cm (vph) 1567 1502 582 688
/c ratio 0,01 , 0,01 0,38 0.39
Queue length (95%) 0,04 0.02 1,77 1,86
Control Delay (s/veh) 7,3 7.4 14.9 13,6
LOS A A B B ,
v..pproach delay (s/veh) - - 14.9 13.6
!ApproaCh LOS - - B B
HCS200(JrM
COPYright 0 2003 University of FloTlda, All Rights Reserved
Version 4, I d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL ,Sl,JMMARY
enerallnformation Site Information
nalvst Intersection ' OMT/PUS Dr& Sheridan Rd
l,aencv/Co, urisdiction
Date Performed Analysis Year
Analvsis Time Period
Proiect Descriotion EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
EastNJest Street: Sheridan Road INorth/South Street: Olvmous Drive
Intersection Orientation: East~West IStudv Periodlhrsl: 0,25
Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments
Maior Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 , 6
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 46 225 28 16 169 27
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,89 0,89 0,89 0,95 0,95 0,95
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 51 252 31 16 177 28
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 - 0 -
PHV - ...,.
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Upstream Sional 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 22 60 15 18 36 37
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,64 0,64 0.64 0,71 0,71 0,71
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 34 93 23 25 50 52
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHV
Percent grade (%) 0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Control Delav. Queue Len th Level of Service
~pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
Volume, v (vph) 51 16 150 127
Capacity, em (vph) 1378 1291 399 461
v/c ratio 0,04 0.01 0,38 0.28
Queue length (95%) 0,12 0.04 1.71 1.11
Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 7,8 19.4 15.8
LOS A A , C C
Approach delay (s/veh) - - 19.4 15,8
!Approach LOS -- - C C
IfCS2Q(}(JTM
Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved
VersIOn 4 ld
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
" , , ,
General Information Site Information
nalyst Intersection' Olympus Dr & Sheridan Rd
\gency/Co. urisdiction.
Jate Performed e>.nalysis '(ear
nalysis Time Period
Proiect Description 2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT
EastlWest Street: Sheridan Road INorth/South Street: Olvmpus Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West , IStudv Period (hrs): 0,25
!Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments
!Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
!Volume (vehlh) 53 ' 261 32 19 196 31
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,89 0,89 0,89 0,95 0,95, 0,95
Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 59 293 35 20 206 32
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 - - 0 - -
PHV
Median type Undivided
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
vonfiguration LTR LTR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor. Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 8 9 10 11 u 12
L T R L T R
~olume (veh/h) 26 - 70 17 21 42 43
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,64 0,64 0,64 0.71 0,71 0.71
Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 40 109 26 29 59 60
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHV
Percent grade (%) 0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
8onfiguration LTR LTR
antral Delav. Queue Len th Level of Service
e>.pproach EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
!volume, V (vph) 59 20 175 148
Capacity, em (vph) 1341 1243 337 391
v/c ratio 0,04 0,02 0,52 0.38
Queue length (95%) 0,14 0,05 2,84 1.73
Control Delay (s/veh) 7,8 7.9 26.7 19.7
LOS A A 0 C.
Approach delay (s/veh) - - 26,7 19.7
Approach LOS - - 0 C
HCS200(fTM
Copyright 0 2003 University ofFlonda, All Ri~ht5 Resef\led
Verslon41d
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY
o c' '
General Information ::>ite Information ,
Analyst Intersection Olvmous Dr & Sheridan Rd
AQency/Co, urisdiction
Date Performed lI,nalysis Year
Analysis Time Period
Project Description 2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH PROJECT n
EastllNest Street: Sheridan Road INorth/South Street: Olvmous Drive
Intersection Orientation: East-West /Studv Period (hrs): 0.25
Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments
Major Street Eastbound Westbound
Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6
L T R L T R
Volume (v~hlh) 53 261 116 40 196, 31
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,89 0,89 0,89 0,95 0,95 0,95
Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 59 293 130 ,42 206 32
Proportion of heavy vehicles, 0 - 0 -
PHV - -
,
Median type. Undivided.
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Upstream Signal 0 0
Minor Street Northbound Southbound
Movement 7 B 9 10 11 12
L T R L T R
Volume (veh/h) 26 70 29 21 42 43
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,64 0.64 0.64 0,71 0.71 0.71
Hourly Flow Rate (vehlh) 40 109 45 29 59 60
Proportion of heaVy vehicles, 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHV \
Percent grade (%) 0 0
Flared approach N N
Storage 0 0
RT Channelized? 0 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0
Configuration LTR LTR
Control Delay, Queue Len th Level of Service
tl.pproach .
EB WB Northbound Southbound
Movement 1 4 7 B 9 10 11 12
Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR
!volume, v (vph) 59 42 194 148
Capacity, Cm (vph) 1341 1147 304 322
v/c ratio 0,04 0,04 0.64 0.46
Queue length (95%) 0,14 0.11 4,08 , 2.31
Control Delay (s/veh) 7,8 8.3 35,6 25,3
LOS A A , E 0 ".
Approach delay (slveh) - - 35.6 25,3
tl.pproach LOS - - E 0
HCS2001JrM
Copynght 0 2003 UnlVerslty of Florida, All Rights Reserved
Version 4 Id
EAST PARK
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD
EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
10/25/05
08:47:09
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Input Worksheet
Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD
I II Key: VOLUMES -- >,
37 922 I 135 II I WIDTHS
0.0 24.0 'I 12.0 II v LANES
0 2 I 1 II --------------------
I " \ 139 12.0 1
------------- / \ ------------------- /1\
58 12.0 I- I
------------------- I
43 12.0 1 / + / 196 12.0 1+ ' , North
--------------,----- I
50 12.0 1
------------------- \ / -------------
154 12.0 1 \ "
-------------------- " 168 1535 202 Phasing: SEQUENCE 47
II 12.0 24.0 12.0 PERMSV NNNN
II 1 2 1 OVERLP NNN N
" LEAD LAG LD LD
SB WE NB EB
RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
--------- ------------ -----------
------- ---------- ---------
Heavy veh, %HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Pk-hr fact, PHF .90 .90 .90 .77 .77 .77 .90 .90 .90 .87 .87 .87
Pre timed or Act A A A A A A A A A A A A
Strtup lost, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Ext eff grn, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival typ, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Ped vol; vped 0 0 0 0
Bike vol, vbic 0 0 0 0
Parking locatns NO NO NO NO
Park mnvrs, Nm 0 0 0 0
Bus stops, , NB 0 0 0 0
" Grade, %G .0 .0 .0 .0
",
------- ---------
----------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sq 47
**/**
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Phase 5
Phase 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/1\
I
I
North
I
+ I + + I ^ I
+ I + + I ++++1
+> 1<+ + I <****1
I v I ++++1 ^
I ^ 1 v 1++++
<* I * +>1 1++++>
* I * + I 1****
* I * + I I v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
C=120"I G= 16.4" I G= 60.1" I G= 14.8" I G= 12.7" I G= 0.0" I G= 0.0" I
1 Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
EAST PARK 10/25/05
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD 08:47:09
EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Volume Adjust & Satflow Worksheet
Volume SB WB NB EB
Adjustment RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
-------- ---------- ------
--:r- ----------- ---------
Volume, V 37 922 135 89 58 196 152 1535 168 104 50 43
Pk-hr fact, PHF .90 .90 .90 .77 .77 .77 .90 .90 .90 .87 .87 .87
Adj mv flow, vp 41 1024 150 116 75 255 169 1706 187 120 57 49
--------------- -------------- ._------------- -------------- -----....--------
Lane group, LG RT+TH LT RT TH+LT LT RT TH :41' RT TH LT
Adj LGflow, v 1065 150 116 169 161 169 1706 187 120 57 49
Prop LT, Pl.T .000 1.00 .000 .556 1.00 .000 .000 1.00 .000 .000 1.00
Prop RT, PRT .,038 .000 1.000 .000 .000 1. 000 .000 .doo 1.000 .000 .000
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Saturation SB WB NB EB
Flow Rate RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
------
Base satflo, so 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Number lanes, N 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
Lane width, fW 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1,.000 1.00 1.00
Heavy veh, flfV .990 .. 990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990
Grade, fg 1.000 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Parking, . fp 1.000 1.00 ,1.000 1. 00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1. 00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Bus block, fbb 1.000 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Area type, fa 1.000 1.00 1:000 1. 00 1.00 1. 000 1.00, 1. 00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Lane util, fLU .950 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1. 000 .950 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Left-turn, fLT 1,000 .950 1.000 .973 .950 1.000 1.00 .950 1.000 1. 00 .950
Right-turn, fRT .994 1.00 .850 1. 00 1.00 .850 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1.00
PedBike LT,fLpb 1.000 1. 0.0 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
PedBike RT , fRpb 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1. 00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Local adjustmnt 1.000 1.00 1:000 1. 00 1. 00 1. 000 1. 00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00
Adj satflow, s 3554 1787 1599 1830 1787 1599 3574 1787 1599 1881 1787
---------- ----- ----- ------
-------- -----
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Capacity and LOS ,Worksheet
Capacity SB WB NB EB
Analysis RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
-------- ------- -------
-------------
Lane group, LG RT+TH LT RT TH+LT LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
Adj Flow, v 1065 150 116 169 161 169 1706 187 120 57 49
Satflow, s 3554 1787 1599 1830 1787 1599 3574 1787 1599 1881 1787
Lost time, tL 4.0 .4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Effect green, g 60.1 16.4 14.8 14.8 14.8 60.1 60.1 16.4 12.7 12.7 12.7
Grn ratio, g/C .501 .137 .123 .123 .123 .501 .501 .137. .106 .106 .106
LG capacity, c 1780 245 197 226 220 801 1790 245 169 199 189
v/c ratio, X .598 .612 .589 .748 .732 .211 .953 .763 .710 .286 .259
Flow ratio, vis .300 .084 .073 .092 .090 .106 .477 .105 .075 .030 .027
Crit lane group * * * *
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Sum erit v/s,Ye 0.749 Total lost, L 16.0
Crit vIe, Xc .865
----------- =========
-------
EAST PARK
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD
EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
10/25/05
08:47:09
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Capacity and LOS Worksheet
Delay SB WE NB EB
and LOS RT 'TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
1 --------- ---------- ----------
--------- --------
Lane group, LG RT+TH LT RT TH+LT LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
Adj Flow, v 1065 150 116 169 161 169 1706 187 120 57 49
LG capacity, c 1780 245 197 226 220 801 1790 245 169 199 189
v/c ratio, X .598 ,612 .589 .748 .732 .211 .953 .763 .710 .286 .259
Grn ratio, g/C .,501 .137 .123 .123 .123 .501 .501 .13'7 .106 .106 .106
Unif delay, d1 21.3 48.8 49.7 50.8 50.7 16.7 28.6 49.9 51. 9 49.5 49.3
Incr calib, k .19 .20 .18 .30 .29 .11 .46 .32 .27 .11 .11
Incr delay, d2 . 6 4.5 4.6 12.9 11.8 .1 12.1 13.3 13.0 ~8 .7
Queue Delay, d3 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
Unif delay, , d1* .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
prog factor, PF 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00
Contrl delay, d 21. 9 53.3 54.3 63.7 62.5 16.9 40.7 63.2 64.9 50.3 50.1
Lane group tos c+ D D E+ E+ B D+ E+ E+ D D
Final Queue,Qbi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Appr delay, ciA 25.8 60.8 40.7 58.0
Approach LOS C+ E+ D+ E+
Appr flow, vA 1215 446 2062 226
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Intersection: Delay 39.4 LOS D+
--------- -------- -------
-------
EAST PARK
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD
EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
10/25/05
08:47:09
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance
Sq 47
**/**
Phase 1
-------------------------------------------------
Phase 4
Phase 2
Phase 3
-------------------------------------------------
/1\
I
I
North
I
+
+
+>
<*
*
*
1++
1++
1<+ +
I v
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
* +>1
* + I
* + 1
^
^ I
1
++++1
<****1
++++1 ^
v I ++++
1++++>
1****
I v
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------------------------------------------
G/C=0.137
G= 16.4"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF= 0.0%
G/C=0.501
G= 60.1"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF=17.0%
G/C=0.123
G= 14.8"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF=70.4%
G/C=O .106
G= 12.7"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF=86.1%
C=120 sec
-------------------------------------------------
G=104.0 sec= 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% P~d= 0.0 sec = 0.0%
MVMT TOTALS SB Approach WB Approach NB Approach EB Approach Int
Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total
------- --
------ ---
AdjVol: vph 41 1024 150 116 169 161 169 1706 187 120 57 49 3949
Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 12/1 12/1-12/1+12/1 24/2 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1
g/C Rqd@C:% 0 39 27 27 28 28 28 52 28 27 25 25
g/C Used: % 0 50 14 12 12 12 50 50 14 11 11 11
SV @E: vph 0 1780 217 168 197 191 801 1790 217 140 169 159 5829
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Svc Lvl:LOS C+ D D E+ E+ B D+ E+ E+ D D D+
Deg Sat:v/c 0.00 0.60 0.61 0.59 0.75 0.73 0.21 0.95 0.76 0.71 0.29 0.26 0.75
HCM Del:s/v 0.0 21. 9 53.3 54.3 63.7 62.5 16.9 40.7 63.2 64.9 50.3 50.1 39.4
Tot Del:min 0 97 33 26 45 42 12 289 49 32 12 10 647
# Stops ,: veh 0 190 35 27 41 39 24 407 45 29 13 11 861
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Queue l:veh 0 24 9 7 11 10 6 57 12 8 3 3 57
Queue 1: ft 0 595 225 177 269 255 146 1442 296 194 83 71 1442
----- -------- -------- --
----- ---
APPR TOTALS Int
Param:Units SB Approach WB Approach NB Approach EB Approach Total
--
--
AdjVol: vph 1215 446 2062 226 3949
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Svc Lvl:LOS C+ E+ D+ E+ , D+
Deg Sat:v/c 0.60 0.70 0.88 0.50 0':75
HCM Del:s/v 25.8 60.8 40.7 58.0 39.4
Tot Del:min 130 113 350 54 647
# Stops :veh 225 107 476 53 861
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Queue l:veh 24 11 57 8 57
Queue 1: ft 595 269 1442 194 1442
---- ------ ---------- ----
------- ---------- ---
EAST PARK
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD
2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT
10/25/05
08:58:42
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Input Worksheet
Intersection #
o -
Area Location Type: NONCBD
I II
43 1069 I 157 II
0.0 24.0 I 12.0 'II
0 2 I 1 II
I II
------------- / \
Key: VOLUMES -- >
I WIDTHS
v LANES
\ 161 12.0 1
/1\
I
I
North
I
67 12.0 1-
50 12.0 1 /
+
/ 227 12.0 1+
58 12.0 1
179 12.0 1 \
\ / -------------
II
II 195 1779 234 Phasing: SEQUENCE 47
II 12.0 24.0 12.0 PERMSV NNNN
II 1 2 1 OVERLP NNNN
/I LEAD LAG LD LD
SB WE NB EB
RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
------ ------- ------
------- ------
Heavy veh, %HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Pk-hr fact, PHF .90 .90 .90 .77 .77 .77 .90 .90 .90 .87 .87 .87
Pre timed or Act A A A A A A A A A A A A
Strtup lost, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Ext eff grn, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival typ, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Ped vol, vped 0 0 0 0
Bike vol, vbic 0 0 0 0
Parking locatns NO NO NO NO
Park mnvrs, Nm 0 0 0 0
Bus stops, NB 0 0 0 0
Grade, %G .0 .0 .0 .0
----- ------ ----------
---- -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sq 47
**/**
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Phase 5
Phase 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/1\
I
I
North
I
+ I + + I ^ I I
+ I + + I ++++1 I
+> 1<+ + I <****1 I
I v I ++++1 ^ I
I ^ I v 1++++ I
<* I * +>1 1++++> I
* I * + I 1**** I
* I * + I I v I
------------------------------------------------~------------------------
C=120" I G= 14.4" I G=" 65.8" I G= 12.7" I <;:: 11.0" I G= 0.0" I G= 0.0" I
I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
EAST PARK 10/25/05
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD 08:58:42
2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITHOUT ,PROJECT
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Volume Adjust & Satflow Worksheet
Volume SB WB NB EB
Adjustment RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
------ -------- --------
------
Volume, V 43" 1069 157 111 67 227 184 1779 195 '129 58 50
Pk-hr fact, PHF .90 .90 .90 .77 .77 .77 .90 .90 .90 .87 .87 .87
Adj ,mv flow, vp 48 1188 174 144 87 295 204 1977 217 148 67 57
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Lane group, LG RT+TH LT RT TH+LT LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
Adj LG flow, v 1236 174 144 196 186 204 1977 217 148 67 57
Prop LT, PLT .000 1.00 .000 .556 1.00 .000 .000 1.00 .000 .000 1.00
Prop RT, PRT .039 .000 1.000 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .0.00 1.000 .000 .000
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Saturation SB WB NB EB
Flow Rate RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
-------- --------
Base satflo, so 1900 1900 1900 1'900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Number lanes, N 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
Lane, width, fW 1.000 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Heavy veh, fHV .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990
Grade, fg 1.000 1. 00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Parking, fp 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1.00 i.oOO 1.00 1.00
Bus block, fbb 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00
Area type, fa 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Lane util, fLU .950 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1. 000 ,950 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1.00
Left-turn, fLT 1.000 .950 1.000 .973 .950 1.000 1.00 .950 1.000 1. 00 .950
Right-turn, fRT .994 1.00 .850 1.00 1.00 .850 1.00 1.00 .850, 1.00 1.00
PedBike LT,fLpb 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 LOO 1. 000 1.00 1.00
PedBike RT, fRpb 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1. 00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Local adjustmnt 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.,00 1.000 1.00 1. 00 1.000 1. 00 1. 00
Adj satflow, s 3553 1787 1599 1830 1787 1599 3574 1787 1599 1881 1787
-----
" SIGNAL2000!TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Capacity and LOS Worksheet
Capacity SB WB NB EB
Analysis RT TH LT ' RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
------ -------
------
Lane group, LG RT+TH LT RT TH+LT LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
Adj Flow, v ,1236 174 144 196 186 204 1977 217 148 67 57
Satflow, s 3553 1787 1599 1830 1787 .1599 3574 1787 1599 1881 1787
Lost time,tL 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,4.0 4.0 4.0
Effect green, g 65.8 14.4 12.7 12.7 12.7 65.8 65.8 14.4 11.0 11.0 11.0
Grn ratio, glC .548 .120 .106 .106 .106 .548 .548 .120 .092 .092 :092
LG capacity, c 1949 215 170 194 190 877 1960 215 147 173 164
vie ratio, X .634 .809 .847 1. 01 .979 .233 1.01 1.01 1.007 .387 .348
Flow ratio, vis .348 .097 .090 .107 .104 .128 .553 .121 .093 .036 .032
Crit lane group * * * *
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Sum critv/s,Yc 0.874 Total lost, L 16.0
Crit vie, Xc 1. 009
--------- ------- -----------
--------
EAST PARK 10/25/05
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD 08:58:42
2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Capacity and LOS Worksheet
Delay SB WE NB EB
and LOS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
----------- ===--====;===
---------
Lane group, LG RT+TH LT RT TH+LT LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
Adj Flow, v 1236' 174 144 196 186 204 1977 217 148 67 57
LG capacity, c 1949 215 170 194 190 877 1960 215 147 173 164
v/c ratio, X .634 .809 ' .847 1.01 .979 .2"33 1.01 1.01 1. 007 .387 .348
Grn ratio, g/C .548 .120 .106 .106 .106 .548 .548 .120 .092 .092 .092
Unif delay, d1 ' 18.8 51.4 52.7 53.6 53.5 14.0 27.1 52.8 54.5 51. 3 51.1
Incr calib, k .21 .35 .38 .50 .48 .11 .50 .50 .50 .11 .11
Incr delay, d2 .7 20.2 30.8 67.3 59.0 .1 22.5 63.8 76.0 1.4 1.3
Queue Delay, d3 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
Unif delay, d1* .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
Prog factor, PF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Contrl delay, d 19.4' 71.6 83.5 121 112 14.2 49.6, 117 130.5 52.8 52.4
Lane group LOS B E F F F " B+ D F F D D
Final Queue,Qbi 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Appr delay, dA 25.9 107.7 52.6 95.0
Approach LOS C+ F D F
Appr flow, vA 1410 526 2398 2,72
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Intersection: Delay 53.2 LOS D
EAST PARK
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD
2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT
10/25/05
08:58:42
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance
-------------------------------------------------
Sq 47 Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 Phase 4
**/** --------------------------------------~----------
I + I + + I ^ I 1 I
I + 1 + + I ++++1 I
/1\ I +> 1<+ + 1 <****1 I
I I I v I ++++1 ^ I
I I I ^ I v ,1++++ I
North I <* I * +>1 1++++> I
I I * I * + I 1**** I
1 * I * + I I v I
- - --- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - -- -- - - - --
G/C=0.120
G= 14.4"
,Y+R= 4.0"
OFF= 0.0%
G/C=0.548
G= 65.8"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF=15.4%
G/C=0'.106
G= 12.7"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF=73.5%
G/C=0.092 I
G= 11.0" I
Y+R= 4.0" I
OFF=87 . 5% . I
-------------------------------------------------
C=120 sec
G=104.0 sec = 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0%
MVMT TOTALS SB Approach WB'Approach NB Approach EB Approach Int
param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Tota'l
---------- ===-"-=== ------ --
-------- ------- ---
AdjVol: vph 48 1188 174 144 196 186 204 1977 217 148 67 57 4606
Wid/Ln:ft/# 010 24/2 12/1 12/1 12/1-12/1+12/1 24/2 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1
g/C Rqd@C:% 0 42 28 28 28 28 29 58 29 28 25 25
g/C Used:' % O. 55 12 11 11 11 55 55 12 9 9 9
SV @E: vph 0 1949 186 141 164 160 877 1960 186 119 143 134 6019
----------- -------------- -------------- ------,;...-------- -------------- -----
Svc Lvl:LOS B E F F F ' B+ ,D F F D D D
Deg Sat:v/c 0.00 0.63 0.81 0.85 1. 01- 0.98 0.23 1. 011. 01 1.01 0.39 0.35 0.84
HCM Del:slv 0.0 19.4 71.6 83.5120.9112.5 14.2 49.6116.6130.5 52.8 52.4 53.2
Tot Del:min 0 100 52 50 99 87 12 408 105 80 15 12 1020
# Stops:veh 0 214 42 35 49 46 26, 494 54 37 16 13 1026
----------- -------------- ----------"---- -------------- -------------- -----
Queue, l:veh 0 27 11 10 16 14 6 71 17 12 4 3 71
Queue 1: ft 0 672 288 251 390 359 163 1782 426 304 101 86 1782
----- ---
---
APPR TOTALS Int
Param:Units SB Approach WB Approach NB Approach EB Approach Total
---- --------- ---------- ----
------ -------- ---
AdjVol: vph 1410 526 2398 272 4606
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Svc Lvl:LOS C+ F D F 0
Deg Sat:v/c 0.66 0.95 0.94 0.72 0.:.84
HCM Del:s/v 25.9 107.7 52.6 95.0 53.2
Tot Del:min 152 236 525 107 ' 1020
# Stops:veh 256 130 574 66 1026
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Queue l:veh 27 16 71 12 71
Queue 1: ft 672 390 1782 304 1782
---------- ---
--
EAST PARK
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD
2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH PROJECT
10/25/05
09:03:13
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Input Worksheet
Intersection #
o -
I II
43 1069 I 220 II
0.0 24.0 I 1~.0 II
0 2 I 1 II
I II
/ \
Area Location Type: NONCBD
Key: VOLUMES -- >
I WIDTHS
v LANES
\ 161 12.0 1
/1\
I
I
North
I
67 12.0 1-
50 12.0 1 /
+
/ 227 12.0 1+
79 12.0 1
179 12.0 1 \
\ / -------------
II
II 207 1816 234 Phasing: SEQUENCE 47
II 12.0 24.0 12.0 PERMsV NNNN
II 1 2 1 OVERLP NNNN
II LEADLAG LD LD
SB WB NB EB
RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
--------- ------- -------- -----------
-------- -------- --------
Heavy veh, %HV 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Pk-hr fact, PHF .90 .90 .90 .77 .77 .77 .90 .90 .90 .87 .87 .87
Pre timed or Act A A A A A A A A A A A A
Strtup lost, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Ext eff grn, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Arrival typ, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Ped vol, vped 0 0 0 0
Bike vol, vbic 0 0 0 0
Parking locatns NO NO NO NO
Park mnvrs, Nm 0 0 0 0
Bus stops, NB 0 0 0 0
Grade, %G .0 .0 .0 .0
------ ----- ---------- --------
-------- --------- -------- ----------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sq 47
**/**
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Phase 5
Phase 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/1\
I
I
North
I
* I + + I ^ I
* I + + I ++++1
*> 1<+ + I <****1
I v I ++++1 ^
I ^ I v 1++++
<+ , * +>1 1++++>
+ I * + I 1****
+ I * + I I v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
C=120"I G= 15.8" I G= 65.2"1 G= 12.4" I G= 10.7" I G= 0.0" I G= 0.0" I
I Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 4.0" 1 Y+R= 4.0" , Y+R= 4.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I
-------'------------------------------------------------------------------
EAST PARK 10/25/05
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD 09:03:13
2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH PROJECT
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Volume Adjust & Satflow Worksheet
Volume SB WB NB EB
Adjustment RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
------
Volume, V 43 1069 ' 220 111 67 227 184 1816 207 129 79 50
1 PHF .90 .90 .90 .77 .77 .77 .90 .90 .90 .87 .87 .87
Pk-hr fact,
Adj mv flow, vp 48 1188 244 144 87 295 204 2018 230 148 91 57
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Lane group, LG RT+TH LT RT TH+LT LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
Adj LG, flow, v 1236 244 144 196 186 204 2018 230 148 91 57
Prop LT, , PLT .000 1.00 .000 .556 1.00 .000 .000 1.00 .000 .000 1.00
Prop RT, PRT .039 .000 1.000 .000 .000 1. 000 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000
--------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- --------------
Saturation SB WB NB EB
Flow Rate RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
-------
Base satflo, so 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Number lanes, N 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
Lane width, fW 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Heavy veh, fHV .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990 .990
Grade, fg 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1. 00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Parking, fp 1. 000" 1. 00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00
Bus block, fbb 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1. 00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Area type, fa 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Lane util, fLU .950 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1. 000 .950 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Left-turn, fLT 1.000 .950 1.000 .973 .950 1. 000 1.00 .950 1.000 1.00 .950
Right-turn, fRT .994 1.00 .850 1.00 1.00 .850 1. 00 1.00 .850 1.00 1.00
PedBike LT,fLpb 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1. 000 1.00 1. 00 1.000 1.00 1.00
PedBike RT, fRpb 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1. 00 1.000 1. 00 1.00
Local adjustmnt 1.000 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.000 1. 00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00
Adj satflow, s 3553 1787 1599 1830 1787 1599 3574 1787 1599 1881 1787
--------
,-
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Capacity and LOS Worksheet
Capacity SB WB NB EB
Analysis RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
-------
-----
Lane group, LG RT+TH LT RT TH+LT LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
Adj Flow, v 1236 244 144 196 186 204 2018 230 148 91 57
Satflow, s 3553 1787 1599 1830 1787 1599 3574 1787 1599 1881 1787
Lost time, tL 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Effect green, g 65.2 15.8 12.4 12.4 12.4 65.2 65.2 15.8 10.7 10.7 10.7
Grn ratio, g/C .543 .131 .103 .103 .103 .543 .543 .131 .089 .089 :089
LG' capacity, c 1930 235 165 189 184 869 1942 235 142 168 159
v/e ratio, X .640 1.04 .873 1.04 1.01 .235 1.04 .979 1.042 .542 .358
Flow ratio, vIs .348 .137 .090 .107 .104 .128 ,565 .129 .093 .048 .032
Crit lane group * * '* *
--------------- -'- - - - - - - - - - - -- -------------- --------'------- ....-------------
Sum crit v/s,Yc 0.901 Total lost, L 16.0
Crit v/c, Xc 1.039
------- ------- --------
EAST PARK 10/25/05
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD 09:03:13
2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH PROJECT
SIGNAL20 0 O/TEAPAC [Ver 1.10.10] - HCM Capacity and LOS Worksheet
Delay SB WE NB EB
and LOS RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
-------- ---------
---------
Lane group, LG RT+TH LT RT TH+LT LT RT TH LT RT TH LT
Adj Flow, v 1236 244 144 196 186 204 2018 230 148 91 57
LG capacity, c 1930 235 165 189 184 .869 1942 235 142 168 159
v/c ratio, X .640 1. 04 .873 1. 04 1.01 .235 1.04 .979 1.042 .542 .358
Grn ratio, g/C .543 .131 .103 .103 .103 .543 .543 .131 .089 .089 .089
Unif delay, d1 19.2 52.1 53.0 53.8 53.8 14.3 27.4 52.0 54.7 52.3 51. 4
Incr calib, k .22 .50 .40 .50 .50 .11 .50 .~8 .50 .14 .11
Incr delay, d2 .7 69.1 36.6 75.5 69.2 .1 31. 4 52.5 87.2 3.5 1.4
Queue Delay, d3 .0 .0 ;0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
Unif delay, d1* .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
Prog factor, PF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00
Contrl delay, d 19.9 121 89.6 129 123 14.5 58.8 104 141.9 55.9 52.8
Lane group LOS B F F F F .B+ E+ F F E+ D
Final Queue,Qbi 0 2 0 2 1 0 19 0 2 0 0
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ------..;..-------
Appr delay, ciA 36.6 116.2 59.4 98.3
Approach LOS D+ F E+ F
Appr flow, vA 1480 526 2452 296
--------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Intersection: Delay 61. 0 LOS E+
------- ----------- --------- ------ -----
----------- ------- ------- -------- --------
EAST PARK
SR-303 & SHERIDAN RD
2010 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH PROJECT
10/25/05
09:03:13
SIGNAL2000/TEAPAC[Ver 1.10.10] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance
---------------------------------------~---------
Sq 47
**/**
Phase 1 ' 1 Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
/1\
I
I
North
I
* I + + I ^ I
* 1 + + I ++++1
*> 1<+ + I <****1
I v I ++++1 ^
I ^ 1 v 1++++
<+ 1 * +>1 1++++>
+ I * + I 1****
+ 1 * + I 1 v
G/C=0.131
G= 15.8"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF= 0.0%
G/C=0.543
G= 65 . 2,"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF=16.5%
G/C=0.103
G= 12.4"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF=74.1%
G/C=0.089
G= 10.7"
Y+R= 4.0"
OFF=87.8%
C=120 sec
G=104.0 sec = 86.7% Y=16.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0%
MVMT TOTALS SB Approach WE Approach NB Approach ' EB Approach Int
Param:Qnits RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total
----- ------ ------ --
---------
AdjVol: vph. 48 1188 244 144 196 186 204 2018 230 148 91 57 4754
Wid/Ln:ft/# 0/0 24/2 12/1 12/1 12/1-12/1+12/1 24/2 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1
g/C Rqd@C:% 0 42 30 28 28 28 29 59 29 28 26 25
g/C Used: % 0 54 13 .10 10 10 54 54 13 9 9 9
SV @E: vph 0 1930 206 136 159, 154 869 1942 206 114 138 130 5984
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Svc Lvl:LOS B F F F F B+ E+ F F E+ D E+
Deg Sat:v/c 0.00 0.64 1.04 0.87 1.04 1. 01 0.23 1.04 0.98 1. 04 0.54 0.36 0.87
HCM Del:s/v 0.0 19.9121. 2 89.6129.3123.0 14.5 58.8104.5141.9 55.9 52.8 61.0
Tot Del:min 0 103 123 54 106 95 12 495 100 87 21 ,13 1209
# stops:veh 0 216 61 35 49 46 27 504 57 37 22 13 1067
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Queue l:veh 0 27 19 10 16 15 7 76 17 13 6 3 76
Queue 1: ft 0 680 488 256 402 373 165 1900 432 316 141 86 1900
----------- -------- ------ ---
---------- ---
APPR TOTALS Int
Param:Units SB Approach WE Approach NB Approach EB Approach Total
--------- --------- --------- -------- --
AdjVol: vph 1480 526 2452 296 4754
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Svc Lvl:LOS D+ F E+ F E+
Deg Sat:v/c 0.71 0.98 0.97 0.76 0.87
HCM Del:s/v 36.6 116.2 59.4 98.3 61.0
Tot Del:min 226 255 607 121 1209
# Stops:veh 277 130 588 72 1067
----------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -----
Queue l:veh 27 16 76 13 - 76
Queue 1: ft 680 402 1900 316 1900
------ -------- --
-------- ---- ---
SIGNAL W ARRANT ANALYSIS, WARRANT 3
Magnuson/Schley Blvd & Wheaton Way
2010 PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project
Warrant met if criteria in either of the following two categories A and B are met:
A. If all 3 of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour of an average day:
1. The total stopped time delay for the minor-str~t approach equals or exceeds 4 vehicle-
hours for a one-lane approach.
SB: 204 veh * 54.9 sec/veh * 1 hr/3600 sec = 3.11 vehicle hours < 4.00 NOT MET
2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 veliicles per hour
for one moving lane of traffic. 139> 100 MET
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per
hour for intersections with 3 approaches, 936 > 650 MET
B. The plotted point in Figure 4C-3 falls above the applicable curve for the existing combination
of approach lanes, NOT MET
WARRANT 3 NOT MET
(Based on estimated future volumes)
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
I 600
a..
>
. 500
I
()
r-<(
wO 400
wO::
0:: a..
r-a..
(j)<( 300
o::w
O~
z=> 200
_...J
~~
ci: 100
UJ
I
CJ
I
400 500 600 700
900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
*Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street
approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower
threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
MAjoR ~Tf<.C€T : 7<77 vPH ""11.JO~ :;'Tl~ef5T: 13' vf'H
'150
*100
SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS, WARRANT 3
OlympusDr & Sheridan Rd
,2010 PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project
Warrant met if criteria in either of the following two categories A and B are met:
I 600
a..
>
I 500
0
1-<(
wO 400
wa:
a: a..
I-a..
({)<( 300
a:W
O~
z~ 200
_...J
~O
>
ci: 100
W
I
~
I
A. If all 3 of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour of an average day:
1. The tota\ stopped time delay for the minor-street approach equals or exceeds 4 vehic1e-
hours for a one-lane approach.
NB: 194 veh * 35.6 sec/veh *1 hr/3600 sec = 1.92 vehicle hours < 4.00 NOT MET
2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour
for one moving lane of traffic. 43+42+21 = 106> 100 MET
3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vehicles per
hour for intersections with 4 approaches. 928 > 800 MET
B. ,The plotted point in Figure 4C-3 falls above the applicable curve for the existing combination
of approach lanes. NOT MET
WARRANT 3 NOT MET
(Based on estimated future volumes)
Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour
'150
'100
400 500 600 7 0 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-
VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
'Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street
approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower
, threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.
MAJo~ STI:€ET: 6<i7 "PH MI"'OR $TREf:T; 125 V'P~
1200 '
1KfEY:
f55 Below curve,
Itorege not 1100
~for
capacfty.
~ Atx1ve curve, 1000
f\.I1her enaJyaIs
rec:ommended.
900
-
-
~
Q
I
700
600
500
400
300
25
20 15
% Total DHVTlming Left (
10 5
tlmIng movement)
o
(1) DHV is total volume from both directions.
(2) Speeds are posted speeds.
Left-Turn Storage Guidelines (TWo-Lane, Unslgnallzed)
Figure 91D-la
.>- ~
~
co
< ()
~
~ \I
:x: r--
S "....
:!::.
'* \0
~ ~ :I::
4... ~
>- '> ~
~ \-
-I f'. u.. \J\
::t. It- UJ N
I,) " ..J
~ \9 t:
"Z .. <
0 ":> - ~
'^ ~ "2- .::i
':l Q(
'Z ..! :> ~
'D ~ \- III
~ lJJ
~ 0 ~ ~
r '"
Design Manual M ~2-o1
January 2005
Intersections At Grade
Page 910-19
'..
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
'" (
'., Account #42742/ ,Ad #100185323
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KITSAP
I, Robin Alexander, beingftrst duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That she is now, and at all times,
embrac~d in the publication herein mentioned was the principalc1erk of the printers and publishers of
KITSAP SUN; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court
of the County of Kitsap, in which County it is pul?lished and is now imd has been for more than six months
prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to; published in the English language continually as
a daily newspaper in Bremerton, KitsapCounty, W~shingt()n, a weekly newspaper in Kitsap County,
Washington and is now and during all of said time; was printed in an office maintained in the aforesaid
place of publication of said newspaper; that the following is a true text of a legal advertisement as it was
published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said newspaper on the following dates, to wit: ,
January 23, 2006 and that such newspaper \Vas regulafIy distributed to.its subscribers dll!ing all of said
period. That the full amount of the fee chargedJor the foregoing publication is the 'sum of $33.26 which
amount has not been paid in full. '
j{oLJM~~
(Signature of Principal Clerk)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of February 2, 2006. ,
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Kitsap 'County. ' '
5
I
I
My Commissio~ ~::~:SO~I;~~H~~!~TON i
~
~~lr.
i OFFICIAL SEAL
DAW.N BLATT
ORDINANCE NO. 4962'
AN ORDINANCE ofthe city Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending the
Comprehensive Plan by adding the East Park Sub Area Plan, and amending the Zoning Code Section
20.80.808(b) to activate the development standirctsfordwelling unit density, setbacks, and road standards
as detaued in this ordinance.-
l -"
PASSED by the City Council the 18th day of January, 2006-
The full text of this ordinance is availablefro.m the City Clerk's Office, 345. Sixth Street, Suite 600,
Bremerton, WA 98337.- .
January 23,2006"#100185323-
,"1f'