HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/02/2008 AGENDA
. '." 'T'Sr~
r ' 'r.'If~, '
:: ~'J~t~.. '" .
FILE
CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 D (360) 473-5280
***AMENDED***
JULY 2, 2008
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
1. BRIEFING: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603
A. General Council Business
B. 15-Minute$ Executive Session to discuss "Pending Litigation" per R.C.W. 42.30.110(1 )(i)
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. in FIRST FLOOR CHAMBERS
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation
3. MAYOR'S REPORT
4. ANNOUNCEMENTS & PUBLIC RECOGNITION
5. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Claims & Check Register (#AB08-151)
B. Minutes of Special Meeting - June 16, 2008 (#AB08-152)
C. Minutes of Study Session - June 25, 2008 (#AB08-153)
D. Budget Adjustment to eliminate one Engineering Technician III position, and to add one
Engineering Technician N position in the Department of Public Works (#AB08-154)
E. Grant of a Temporary Easement through City Utility Lands to Puget Sound Energy (PSE)
(#AB08-155)
F. Resolution No. 3066, setting a hearing date of August 20, 2008 to vacate a portion of the alley
between Burwell Street and the existing mid-block alley bounded also by 4th Street and
Washington & Pacific Avenues (adjacent to the former City Hall properties) (#AB08-156)
G. Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with Kitsap County for preparation of a new Comprehensive Solid
Waste Management Plan (#AB08-157)
H. 10-Year Utility Services Contract with the United States Navy for Water, Wastewater, and
Stormwater Services (#AB08-158)
I. Budget Adjustment for the 2008 Professional Services Budget in the Legal Department
(#AB08-159)
6. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Application for 2008 Justice Assistance Grant for Equipment Funding (#AB08-160)
B. Resolution No. 3065, authorizing a Sole Source Contract and Goods & Services Agreement
for the purchase of a Restroom Building Package for Blueberry Park from ROMTEC, INC.
(#AB08-161 )
C. Legal Services for NPDES II Permit Appeal (#AB08-162)
7. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
8. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
fI Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations should contact the
City Clerk's Office at (360) 473-5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Council meeting.
DATE SUBMITTED: 7/2/2008
BILL # AB08-151
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
5A
............................................................................................
SUBJECT:
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date: July 2, 2008
Department: Financial Services
Presenter: Cathy Johnson
Phone: 473-5296
Claims & Check Register
SUMMARY:
Consent Agenda item. Approval of checks and electronic fund transfers.
ATTACHMENTS: Check Register.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
~JM{- ?'
P
CONSENT AGENDA C2J
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
1) Check #'s 325379 through 325691 and EFT's 7930 through 7975 in the amount of
$4,141,108.88.
2) Regular Payroll for the pay period ending June 15, 2008 in the amount of$729,250.00.
3) Retiree Payroll for the pay period ending June 15, 2008 in the amount of$78,531.10.
COUNCIL ACTION: C2J Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
08 - f 5 ~
DATE SUBMITTED:
BILL #
58
........................................................................................
/1 S' pur ~ \ 'M (.. e.t< Y\. ~ "
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes Committee Meeting Date: N/A
for meeting of COUNCIL MEE~ING Date: ~J ~.2 ':> nn ~
rl10VlJ~ '( ~u t'\ e.. I" 200 B Department: City ouncll
) I Presenter: Will Maupin,
Council President
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting held MontA.Q.'1 ) ~vn~ '~l 2..Ooe.
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes for Movtd..O-'1 ) :r UI'1e- I "J .2...Do g,
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/A
APPRO V ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
Council President
N/A
N/A
N/A
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
~
~a;~~
CONSENT AGENDA [B'"
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
Monday, June 16, 2008
The Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton Jwas called to order in the City Council
Chambers, of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER 345 6t11 Str~et, Bremerton, Washington, Monday,
June 16, 2008, at 5:30 PM, with Council President Will Maupin presiding. Council Members present
were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Mike ShepHerd, Roy Runyon, Adam Brockus, and
Brad Gehring. Council Member Cecil McConnell was absent. AI!so present were City Attorney Roger
Lubovich; City Clerk Carol Etgen; and Legislative Assistant Lori $mith.
I
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Brad GehrinQ followed by the invocation
provided by Associate Pastor Dennis Huelle of Peace Lutherah Church.
President Maupin announced that prior to the meeting, a Briefi~g was held to discuss General Council
Business; and that a Special Meeting of the Council was being h1eld tonight on Monday, June 16, 2008
because a majority of the Council Members will be in Yakima thi[ week for the Association of
Washington Cities Annual Conference.
MAYOR'S REPORT
· In the Mayor's absence, Community Development Director .6jndrea Spencer was pleased to
announce that the City received the "2008 Smart Communl1ties Award" from Governor Gregoire
for the City of Bremerton's development of the Downtown Regional Center Sub Area Plan; and
provided framed certificates to each member of the councilj
PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS
Roy Runyon reiterated that the next District 4 Meeting would b held on Tuesday, June 17, 2008
beginning at 5:30 PM in the Council Conference Room of the Ndrm Dicks Government Center for a
program on "Pets in the City"with Rance McEntyre of the Kitsap! Humane Society.
Dianne Robinson encouraged citizens to attend the 4th Annuall"Juneteenth Celebration" this Saturday,
June 21, 2008 from 12:00 to 6:00 PM at Evergreen Park.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Check Numbers 325077 through 325378; and EFT-7906 thr ugh EFT-7929 in the amount of
$2,255,697.81; and Regular Payroll in the amount $774,2081.71 for the pay-period ending May 31,
2008 (#AB08-143)
B. Minutes of Meeting - June 4,2008 (#AB08-144)
C. Minutes of Meeting - June 11,2008 (#AB08-145)
D. Renewal of Monitoring Well Lease with U.S. Navy at N.A.D. Park (#AB08-146)
E. Contract Award for Construction of Southwest Bremerton Residential Sewer Extension Pump Station
to PIVETTA BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. (#AB08-147)
There were no comments from the public. . .
05:37:24 M/S/C/U (Runyon/Wofford) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented.
GENERAL BUSINESS I
6A - CONTRACT AWARD FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HARLdw DRIVE PEDESTRIAN
IMPROVEMENTS TO SERPANOK CONSTRUCTION (#AB08-148): City Engineer Michael Mecham
stated that sealed bids for construction of the project titled "Harl~w Drive Pedestrian Improvements"
were opened on June 3, 2008. The engineer's estimate for con1struction of the project is $188,266.40.
Two bids were received for this project; and SERPANOK CONSTRGCTION was the lowest responsive,
responsible bidder with a bid of $163,435.30 including sales taxl.- A PowerPoint@ presentation was made
to show further details of the project
City Council Special Mtg. Minutes
Monday, June 16, 2008
Page 2 of 4
There were no comments from the public.
Mr. Shepherd encouraged the City to consider a policy for use of pervious pavement in all future similar
projects. Public Works Director Phil Williams assured the Council that his Department is currently
working on a policy for permeable asphalt.
Mr. Maupin hoped that this project will improve safety in the neighborhood and encourage more people
to walk.
05:49:15 M/S/C/U (Wofford/Runyon) Move to award the contract in the amount of $163,435.30 including
sales tax with SERPANOK CONSTRUCTION for construction of the project titled "Harlow Drive Pedestrian
Improvements"; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the necessary contract documents for
construction.
6B - RESOLUTION. NO. 3062, AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES OF FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE
2008 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) LEVY BALLOT MEASURE (#AB08-149): Fire Chief
AI Duke summarized that this resolution will identify where the funds would be expanded if the citizens
pass the 2008 EMS Levy Ballot Measure. As presentations are starting to be made on the ballot
measure, this resolution will enable them to show where the revenues would be spent. It was explained
that the current EMS Levy will expire December 31,2009.
There were no comments from the public.
Mr. Runvon asked for the status of the current EMS funding. Chief Duke answered that current funding
is about $1.2 million.
Ms. Robinson asked if the levy did not pass, when would the next opportunity be to put the levy on the
ballot. Chief Duke stated that the levy could be placed on the ballot during the next election in 2009.
05:53:38 M/S/C/U (Arends/Gehring) Move to pass Resolution No. 3062.
6C - RESOLUTION NO. 3063 (NORTH) AND RESOLUTION NO. 3064 (SOUTH), APPROVING
ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR TWO TERRITORIES IN THE SOUTH KITSAP INDUSTRIAL
AREA (SKIA) (#AB08-150): Community Development Director Andrea Spencer explained that the
action before Council is the consideration of two annexation petitions in the South Kitsap Industrial Area
(SKIA). The two petitions were presented on April 22, 2008 and are described as the "SKIA North
Petition" and the "SKIA South Petition". As required by state law, the petitions include the signatures by
owners of not less than 1 0% of assessed property value in the area proposed for annexation (in fact, the
petitions contain signatures of 1 00% of the owners). State law requires that the City Council conduct a
meeting with the petitioners within 60 days of petition submittal and staff has timely scheduled this
meeting to occur on June 16, 2008. Following the meeting with the petitioners, the City Council has the
option to accept, reject, or geographically modify the petitions. Should the Council decide to accept the
petitions, the proposed resolutions presented with this report will do so and will allow the annexation to
proceed to the next step, gathering of signatures on the "75% Petition".
A PowerPoint@ presentation was provided to discuss the details of the "Urban Services Overview",
specifically financial details of the three scenarios (Scenario A "Low Growth"; Scenario B "High Growth";
and Scenario C "SKIA Sub Area Plan"). Finance Director Laura Lvon discussed the costs related to
Fire/EMS protection and Police protection for the various scenarios; and Public Works Director Phil
Williams discussed details of the various scenarios regarding the infrastructure, including
Transportation, Water, Stormwater, and Wastewater Management.
City Council Special Mtg. Minutes
Monday, June 16, 2008
Page 3 of 4
Public comments began at 6:58 PM...
David Overton, one of the property owners of the proposed area, requested that the Council approve
this 10% petition tonight. .
DOUQ Scrobut, President of the McCormick Land Company, also encouraged approval tonight.
Rod Reid, President of Alpine Evergreen Company, commented that he was also a part of this
annexation area and echoed the previous comments of support.
Chervl Kincer, Port of Bremerton Commissioner for District NO.1 which includes the City of Bremerton,
also encouraged this action. She presented a handout titled "Port of Bremerton Discussions with
Developers and Development Professionals" dated April 2 & 3, 2008 and read the positive points listed
for "pursuing annexation into the City of Bremerton".
Garv Bolster, Liberty Business Center, discussed a concern with stormwater run-off near Lake Lindy.
Mr. Williams believed that the City would work with Mr. Bolster and residents whose property would be
within the City's boundaries in order to maximize use of property and limit run-off, as well as avoid
construction in wetland areas.
Main Motions were made at 7:11 PM... Discussion then took place by the Council...
Mr. Shepherd emphasized that rural planners typically do not take on projects that are industrial in
nature and that the City's planners would better address future projects in the proposed annexation
area.
Mr. GehrinQ provided positive comments and also asked who would provide the cost for maintaining the
streets. Mr. Williams stated it depends where the street was located within SKIA but he estimated that
maintenance support could come from the Port of Bremerton, the developers, and City funds.
Ms. Robinson provided comments in support of these resolutions; and thanked the staff for all the time
they have put into this effort; but asked for clarification on what "U.L.I.D." stood for? Ms. Lvon
answered that a "U.L.I.D." is a Utility Local Improvement District, which allows the City to acquire low-
interest financing to construct a project; and then property owners who benefit from the improvements
share the costs in constructing the project by paying for the debt over a set period of time.
Mr. Runvon stated his main concern was financial stability, but is now satisfied that we will not be
adding a burden to the ratepayers. He further commented on the indirect benefits that not only
Bremerton itself will receive, but the surrounding communities will receive as well.
Mr. Wofford asked for confirmation that the money for utility rate financing will come from the
businesses within SKIA. Ms. Lvon stated the burden would come from and be shared by those who
would be developing the property.
Mr. Brockus clarified that this vote tonight only sets the boundaries; and asked if there other options for
other utility districts to provide services. Mr. Williams stated yes to both comments.
Mr. Maupin commented that the Urban Growth Area abuts the City so the City has an obligation to
consider this annexation to prove the City can service this area and provide infrastructure to handle
growth without placing a burden on the current ratepayers.
07:29:08 M/S/C/U (Shepherd/Brockus) Move to pass Resolution No. 3063 accepting the proposal to
commence annexation proceedings for the territory known as SKIA North, as amended (to add a portion
of State Route 3).
City Council Special Mtg. Minutes
Monday, June 16, 2008
Page 4 of 4
07:29:22 M/S/C (Arends/Robinson) Move to pass Resolution No. 3064 accepting the proposal to
commence annexation proceedings for the territory known as SKIA South, as amended (to add Lake
Flora Road).
Voted in favor of Motion: Robinson, Arends, Wofford, Gehring, Runyon, Shepherd, Maupin
Abstained: Brockus
Motion carried: 7-Yes; 1-Abstention
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Dianne Robinson commended Community Development Director Andrea Spencer and the Planning
Department for a job well done in receiving the Governor's Smart Community Award recently. She also
reported on her attendance at a Neighborhood Block Watch Captains meeting with fellow Council
Member Roy Runyon where a discussion was held on disaster preparedness, and noted that residents
may contact Community Resource Office Andy Oakley at the Bremerton Police Department for more
information on holding these meetings in their neighborhoods or to obtain disaster preparedness kids.
She reported on a Health Board resolution recently adopted which included monitoring of contaminated
sites and clean-up; also attended a presentation on preventing child abuse which was given by Susan
Shultz who also serves with her on the Child Death Review Committee.
Mike Shepherd mentioned that his neighborhood meetings will begin discussions for developing
standards to monitor runoff into Dyes Inlet and hoped these standards would correct the problems.
Roy Runyon reiterated the information previously reported by fellow Council Member Robinson; and
noted that he planned to discuss disaster and earthquake preparedness at a future District 4 meeting.
Adam Brockus announced that the Bremerton Marina Breakwater project received the 2007 Award for
"Outstanding Large Project Civil Engineering Achievement" by the Seattle Chapter of the American
Society of Civil Engineers; and the "Outstanding Small Project" for seismic upgrades of Bremerton Naval
Hospital. These projects will now be forwarded on for consideration at the Western Regional Awards
that will be announced in Lake Tahoe this September.
Brad Gehrina sadly reported the passing today of his brother-in-law Bill Dawson; and noted that along
with nicer weather, comes more motorcycle riders, therefore cautioned the public to be please be aware.
Will Maupin reported on his attendance at the latest PSRC Growth Management Policy Board meeting
held last week and will be looking forward to future presentations regarding plans for Growth Centers for
Bremerton and Silverdale; and commented that while riding on the ferry, Bremerton really looks good!
With no further business, President Maupin adjourned the Council Meeting at 7:40 PM.
L RI SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest:
CAROL ETGEN, City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WM:CE:ls:cg
DATE SUBMITTED:
BILL #
DB - (5 3
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
5t
........................................................................................
Committee Meeting Date: NI A
COUNCIL MEETING Date: ~v l6.2 200 e
Department: City ounc11
Presenter: Will Maupin,
Council President
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting held ::fvY\e. .:2. ~ 2008,
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
for meeting of
::::rIJne. 2, 5 j 2008
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes for :rv\o'\e.. 2..5) 2.00 8
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/A
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
Council President
N/A
N/A
N/A
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
~
~4/c2~
CONSENT AGENDA [B"
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Conference Room in Room 603 of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER located at
345 6th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, June 25, 2008, at 5:00 PM, with Council
President Will Maupin presiding. Council members present were Carol Arends, Dianne
Robinson, Roy Runyon, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Brad Gehring. Council Members
Mike Shepherd and Nick Wofford were absent. Legislative Assistant Lori Smith was also
present to provide staff support to the Council.
President Maupin announced that the Study Session was for the Council to hear presentations
on upcoming agenda items. It was further announced that this Study Session was open to the
public, but there would be no opportunitie~ for input or participation; that no action will be taken,
and the content of these items is subject to change.
A. NO DISCUSSION PLANNED - The following are budgeted items or have been reviewed by
the appropriate Council Committee; and will be placed on the next Council Meeting Agenda
for action:
1. Application for 2008 Justice Assistance Grant for equipment funding - Chief Craig
Rogers, Bremerton Police Department; and Public Safety & Parks Committee Chair
Brad Gehring General Business
2. Proposed Resolution for Sole Source Purchase of Restroom Building Package for
Blueberry Park from ROMTEC, INC. - Parks Director Wyn Birkenthal; and Public Safety &
Parks Committee Chair Brad Gehring General Business
3. Budget Adjustment to eliminate one Engineering Technician III position, and to add one
Engineering Technician IV position in the Department of Public Works - Public Works
Administrative Analyst Paul Lucas; and Public Works Committee Chair Cecil McConnell
Consent
4. Grant of a Temporary Easement through City Utility Lands to Puget Sound Energy
(PSE) - City Engineer Michael Mecham; and Public Works Committee Chair Cecil
McConnell Consent
5. Proposed Resolution setting a hearing date of August 20, 2008 to vacate a portion of
the alley between Burwell Street and the existing mid-block alley bounded also by 4th
Street and Washington & Pacific Avenues (adjacent to the former City Hall properties)-
City Engineer Michael Mecham; and Public Works Committee Chair Cecil McConnell
Consent
6. Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with Kitsap County for preparation of a new Comprehensive
Solid Waste Management Plan - Public Works Director Phil Williams; and Public Works
Committee Chair Cecil McConnell Consent
7. Budget Adjustment for the 2008 Professional Services Budget in the Legal Department
- City Attorney, Roger Lubovich; and Public Safety & Parks Committee Chair Brad
Gehring Consent
City Council Study Session Minutes
Wednesday, June 25,2008
Page 2 of 2
B. FULL DISCUSSION ITEMS
8. 1 O-Year Utility Services Contract with the United States Navy for Water, Wastewater,
and Stormwater Services - Public Works & Utilities Director Phil Williams; and Public
Works Committee Chair Cecil McConnell Consent
C. GENERAL COUNCIL BUSINESS
9. Update on Action Steps and Committee Assignment of 2008-2009 Council Goals &
Priorities - Council President Will Maupin
President Maupin announced that the Admiral Theater Board of Directors invited the Council
Members to attend a reception to meet new members of the Board immediately following the
Study Session tonight. Council Members were also reminded that the next Council Meeting
would be held on Wednesday, July 2, 2008.
With no further business, President Maupin adjourned the Council Study Session at 6:20 PM.
Prepared and Submitted by:
~
Legislative Assistant
Attest:
CAROL ETGEN, City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WM:CE:ls:cg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
BILL # tJ g - 154
DATE SUBMITTED: JUNE 11, 2008
5D
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IN
POSITION NUMBERS
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
JUNE 25, 2008
JULY 2, 2008
PUB WKS & U~
PAUL LUCAS ~.
473-2328
SUMMARY: In 2007, a position audit was done on an Engineering Technician III position which
resulted in a recommendation to upgrade that position to an Engineering Technician IV. Due to an
administrative oversight, this was not done for the 2008 budget. It is requested that the City Council
approve a personnel budget adjustment in Engineering to eliminate one Engineering Technician III
position and add one Engineering Technician IV position.
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Increase in salary of approximately $3400.00 for
the remainder of 2008.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION: That the City Council approve the elimination of one Engineering
Technician III position and add one Engineering Technician IV position in the Department of Public
Works & Utilities and authorize the necessary changes to the approved 2008 budget.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
I
I
I
DATE SUBMITTED: June 18,2008
I
08-155
BILL #
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
5E
........................................................................................
I
I
I
SUBJECT: Grant of a Te~porary Easement
through City Utility Lands tb Puget Sound
I
Energy (PSE).:
I
I
I
I
!
,
I
SUMMARY: Triway Entefprises is pursuing a residential development in the West Hills area East of
Reservoir 23. The existing ~lectrical service to Reservoir 23 and the communication towers above
Reservoir 23 are currently ih an easement running through the proposed development. This requested
temporary easement will be!used for electrical service until the site work for the subdivision is
completed. At that time a n~w electrical service will be constructed across the subdivision using the
new City streets as the alignment and these lines will be operated under the existing franchise PSE has
with the City.l
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
June 25, 2008
July 2,2008
Engineering
Michael Mecham
473-5288
ATTACHMENTS: 1.) Co~cil Summary; 2.) Temporary Construction Easement, and; 3.) Aerial
Photograph. j
FISCAL IMPACTS (InclJde Budgeted Amount): None. All construction costs for the temporary
relocation and the permanent power infrastructure will be the responsibility of the developer and PSE.
I
I
I
APPROVALS: i
I
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
~~:C:T::E~~~~~T: I ~~~
I
I
I
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Temporary Easement to Puget Sound Energy
and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the necessary documents with substantially the same
terms and conditions as preJented.
I
I
I
,
CONSENT AGENDA
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
I
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 1<pprove 0 Deny D Table
o Continue 0 No Action
Council Summary
Granting of a Temporary Easement to PSE
Triway Enterprises is pursuing residential development in the West Hills area east of
Reservoir 23 and south of Pendergast Park. A residential subdivision for over 600 lots
has received preliminary plat approval. Triway is pursuing additional approval for
several hundred more lots to be designated as an active adult community. The electrical
service to and communication towers above Reservoir 23 located in the watershed are in
an easement through these proposed developments. To facilitate the construction of the
subdivision it is necessary to realign the electrical service and easement. A temporary
easement from a transformer locate in Ace Paving's property east of Reservoir 23 to a
location just east of Reservoir 23 is proposed and will be used until the subdivision is
,
completed. A permanent electrical service will be constructed across the subdivisions
using the new streets as its alignment.
RIGHT OF ENTRY, LICENSE AND
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
This Right of Entry and Temporary Construction Easement between Puget Sound Energy, Inc.,
a Washington Corporation (PSE), hereinafter called "Grantee", and The City of Bremerton, a
Washington Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called "Grantor', is made this day of
,2008.
RECITALS
A. Description of Property. Grantor warrants that it is the owner of the real property ("The
Property") legally described as:
NW1/4 & SW1/4 & NE1/4 LESS SE1/4 NE1/4 LESS TAX LOT 39 & W1/2 NW1/4 SE1/4
LESS TAX LOT 31; EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING PER AUDITOR FILE NO 9205140195:
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 29,
TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., IN KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE SOUTH ONE-EIGHTH OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29.
IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth,
it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:
1. Riqht of Entry. License. and Construction Easement. Grantor grants a Right of Entry, License
and Temporary Construction Easement to PSE, its agents, employees and contractors, to
enter the above described real property and to enter and use the Temporary Construction
Easement for the accommodation of Construction equipment and the installation of facilities,
materials and appurtenances necessary for completion of PSE's underground electric primary
line. The easement area is generally depicted on the drawing attached as Exhibit "A" and
further described as follows: The temporary construction easement is ten (10) feet wide
with the the centerline of said ten feet being the centerline of Grantee's facilities as
now constructed, to be constructed, extended or relocated within the northwest
quarter of the northeast quarter of the above described real property.
2. Restoration. Upon completion of its construction project, PSE or its agent shall return the
Temporary Construction Easement area and all portions of the property affected by use of the
easement to a condition reasonably comparable to the condition in which it existed prior to
PSE's use of this easement. The intent of this provision is to ensure that if PSE's use of this
easement indirectly causes damage to other portions of the Property apart from the
Temporary Construction Easement area, PSE shall correct such damage even though it is
outside the easement area.
3. Hold Harmless. PSE agrees to fully indemnify and hold Grantor, their successors, heirs and
assigns harmless from any and all claims or damages arising from or out of, and to the
extend of, the negligent acts or omission of PSE employees, agents, or,contractors in
connection with the performance of this Agreement.
4. Term. This Agreement shall be effective from the date PSE notifies its contractor to proceed
with construction, and shall terminate upon completion of West Hills Residential development
project. Completion shall mean the point in time at which Grantee is instructed by West Hills
to cut, abandon, remove or cease to use those underground electric facilities installed under
this temporary easement, and said facilities are actually cut, abandoned, removed or disused.
If due to circumstances beyond PSE's control which do not allow for the construction to be
completed as described, PSE will present to the Grantor, in writing, a revised schedule for
their approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld.
5. Successors and Assiqns. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the rights and
obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective
successors and assigns.
GRANTOR:
The City of Bremerton
GRANTEE:
Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
BY;
BY:
ITS:
ITS:
PSE Job Number: 101049133
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)SS
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 2008, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
, to me known to be the person who
signed as (TITLE) of The City of Bremerton, the municipal corporation that
executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be his/her free and
voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of The City of Bremerton for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that _ was authorized to execute the said instrument
on behalf of said The City of Bremerton.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above
written.
GIVEN UNDER my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate
first above written.
(Signature of Notary)
(Print or stamp name of Notary)
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
My Appointment Expires:
STATE OF
)
)SS
)
COUNTY OF
On this day of , 2008, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Steven R.
Botts, to me known to be the person who signed as Supervisor Real Estate of Puget Sound Energy, Inc.,
the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be
his/her free and voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of Puget Sound Energy,
Inc. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the
said instrument on behalf of said Puget Sound Energy, Inc..
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above
written.
(Signature of Notary)
(Print or stamp name of Notary)
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
My Appointment Expires:
PSE Job Number: 101049133
Proposed Temporary
Underground Power
Easement
Legend
Map Document: (1:\GfS-data\WATERSHED POWER EASEMENT.mxd)
6113/2008 -- 10:07:57 AM
DATE SUBMITTED: June 18, 2008
BILL # 08 - IS~
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SF
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Resolution # 30(JQ
Vacation of a Portion of the Alley between
Burwell Street and the existing mid-block
alley bounded also by Fourth Street and
Washington and Pacific A venues.
Committee Meeting Date: June 25, 2008
COUNCIL MEETING Date: July 2, 2008
Department: Engineering
Presenter: Michael Mecham
Phone: 473-5288
SUMMARY: As part of the redevelopment of the former City Hall properties, Economic
Development has initiated the vacation of a portion of the alley to allow the current owner of the
property, Hotel Concepts, Inc., better use of the site. This date has been scheduled for a public
hearing in accordance with state law and the Bremerton Municipal Code for first reading on the
proposed ordinance vacating the subject property. In accordance with BMC 11.20.080(d), no
compensation 'is required.
ATTACHMENTS: 1.) Resolution # 'bo~fQ; 2.) Exhibit Drawing; 3.) Engineering Staff Report.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None.
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTO
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Resolution # 3oCo~ setting a hearing date of August 20, 2008 for vacating a portion of
alley between Burwell Street and the existing mid-block alley, adjacerit to the former City Hall
properties.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve D Deny D Table
6-16-08 Agenda Bill for Resolution Alley vacation
o Continue D No Action
RESOLUTION NO. 3r::fofo
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, establishing a hearing date for the
proposed vacation of a portion of the alley between Burwell Street
and the existing mid-block alley, bounded also by Fourth Street
and Washington and Pacific A venues in downtown Bremerton.
WHEREAS, the City initiated the vacation in accordance with Bremerton
Municipal Code (BMC) 11.20.080 as part of the redevelopment of the former City Hall
properties; NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. A public hearing will be held on August 20,2008, at 5:30 p.m. or
later in the City Council Chambers at the Norm Dicks Government Center, First Floor, 345 Sixth
Street, Bremerton, Washington, to take public comment or consider written objections to the
vacation.
SECTION 2. Severability. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect' the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Resolutiori shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this
,2008.
day
of
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
CAROL ETGEN, City Clerk
1
Portion of Alley between Burwell Street and existing mid-block alley - Resolution
z
z z 0
I-
0 a::
a:::j:: l.J...<;;t ~ W
0<( ON ::2:
l.J...u 0:)
Z . w 0
. . 1-<( I- ~ a::: '- .
o . 01"':
. 00> i=1'0~CD NC:>
'-
I>- 0::: -l.J... N
XW o . .0
W...J CLUD:::
...J W >-
<t: (f) ~
U
City of Bremerton, Department of Public Works and Utilities
Engineering Division Staff Report
Proposed Partial Alley Vacation at Former City Hall Property
City Council/Public Hearing Date:
Report Prepared By:
August 20,2008
Gunnar Fridriksson, Civil Engineer II
SUMMARY
A.
Applicant:
City of Bremerton
345 6th Street, Suite 600
Bremerton, WA 98337
Location:
The easterly 5 feet of the alley dedicated in conjunction with
Ordinance 5013 and recorded with Kitsap County Auditor's File No.
200707270110.
B. Attachment: Exhibit Map
BACKGROUND
The City of Bremerton originally vacated portions of the alleys adjacent to the former
City Hall to facilitate the redevelopment of the former City Hall properties. As part of the
requirements for these alleys being vacated, the City requested conveyance of a new
north-south alley connecting Burwell Street and the existing 14-foot alley.
This new alley was the westerly 20 feet of Lot 14 of the properties. The developer of
the former City Hall properties has requested that the new alley be reduced to 15-foot.
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONDITIONS
. Functional Classification
. Existing Right-of-Way Width
. Proposed Right-of-Way Width
. Pavement Width
. Surface Type
. Curb and Gutter
. Sidewalks
Alley
20 feet
1 5 feet
20 feet
Asphalt
N/A
N/A
June 10, 2008
Engineering Division Staff Report
Proposed Alley Vacation at former City Hall
Page 1 of 3
HEARING CONSIDERATIONS
BMC 11.20.120 sets forth issues that the City Council shall determine following the
Vacation Hearing. These issues and City staff positions are as follows:
1. Whether the street, alley or portion thereof is no longer required for public
use and vacation of the described portion will better serve the public good.
Staff Position:
This portion of the right-of-way will not be required for public use.
2. Whether the vacation is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Position:
The proposed vacation does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Whether continued use of the proposed vacation as a public way is not of
such public benefit as to justify the costs of maintenance.
Staff Position:
Maintenance costs will be comparable to the cost to maintain the existing alley.
4. Whether substitution of a new and different thoroughfare would be more
useful to the public.
Staff Position:
N/A - Roadway is remaining, reduced width.
5. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater
public use or need than presently exists.
Staff Position:
The relocated roadway will be consistent with future redevelopment of the site
and is expected to meet future public needs.
6. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of
private property abutting the same.
Staff Position:
The former City property is the only property abutting the vacation.
SHORELINE ACCESS
This portion of right-of-way does not provide shoreline access.
June 10, 2008
Engineering Division Staff Report
Proposed Alley Vacation at former City Hall
Page 2 of 3
UTILITIES
The Department of Economic Development has contacted and been negotiating with
the private utility companies to abandon or relocate their existing infrastructure. No
easements will be required for the private or City utilities.
SUFFICIENCY OF SIGNATURES
Not Applicable - The City initiated the vacation.
COMPENSATION
Not Applicable - The City initiated the vacation.
STAFF COMMENTS
The City Fire Department, Attorney, Department of Community Development, Police
Department, and Engineering all support this vacation.
Staff recommends approval of the vacation of these portions of the alley.
,:' ~'Iiiii.." ~iiiJ;; !i?"
..,... " rJi ~;;~!1
_" :.''',' f~
...
,~j)f:f [:ir~ ~
~: ~~~ ~~ ~Jl
r,----;~
~I~flj
\k.~
~ \
~ f~~
II r- :lr
Looking northerly from Burwell along new alley.
June 10, 2008
Engineering Division Staff Report
Proposed Alley Vacation at former City Hall
Page 3 of 3
DATE SUBMITTED: June 19,2008
BILL # 0 8 - 15 7
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
66-
...............................................................~........................I
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with
Kitsap County for preparation of a new
Comprehensive Solid Waste Management
Plan
Committee Meeting Date: June 25, 2008
COUNCIL MEETING Date: July 2, 2008
Department: PW&U
Presenter: Phil Williams
Phone: 473-5315
SUMMARY: State of Washington RCW 70.95 requires each local govemmentjurisdiction to have an
approved Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (CSWMP) in place. Kitsap County operates and
maintains the solid waste transfer station and disposal system for all local government agencies and has taken
the lead on comprehensive planning for solid waste for many years.
This ILA creates a partnership between Kitsap County and the incorporated cities (Bremerton, Port Orchard,
Poulsbo/Suquamish, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribes) to develop a new 6-year comprehensive solid waste plan.
Once developed the plan will be submitted to each of the cities for adoption.
ATTACHMENTS:
ILA with Kitsap County for the new Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None. The cost to develop a new CSWMP is paid
for by the County out of tipping fees.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTO
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
~~
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the ILA for the Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the same.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KC- -08
BETWEEN KIT SAP COUNTY AND CITIES OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND,
BREMERTON, PORT ORCHARD, POULSBO / SUQUAMISH,
PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM, TRIBES
DESIGNATING KITSAP COUNTY AS THE LEAD AGENCY
FOR THE REVISION OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, RCW 70.95.020 assigns primary responsibility for solid waste planning to local
government; and
WHEREAS, RCW 70.105.007(3) assigns responsibility for moderate risk waste planning to local
government; and
WHEREAS, RCW 70.95.010 states that solutions to the state's solid waste management
problems require regional solutions by local governments as well as intergovernmental
cooperation; and
WHEREAS, RCW 70.95.090 requires the comprehensive solid waste management plan to
include the estimated long-range planning needs for solid waste handling facilities projected
twenty (20) years into the future; and
WHEREAS, RCW 70.95.110 requires all solid waste management plans be maintained in a
current condition to be reviewed and revised periodically; and
. WHEREAS, RCW 70.95.080 requires counties, in cooperation with the various cities located
within such county, to prepare a coordinated, comprehensive solid waste management plan; and
WHEREAS, RCW 70.95.080 also requires each city to (1) prepare and deliver to the county, an
independent solid waste management for integration into the county plan; or (2) enter into an
agreement with the county to participate in the preparation of a joint city-county plan for solid
waste management; or (3) authorize the county to prepare a plan for the city's solid waste
management for inclusion in the comprehensive county solid waste management plan; and
WHEREAS, RCW 70.105.220 requires each local government to prepare a local hazardous
waste management plan which may be amended as the needs arises; and
WHEREAS, local governments may choose to either include a moderate risk waste element of
their solid waste plans, or develop moderate risk waste plans separately from their solid waste
plans, recognizing that if the local government chooses not to combine the two plans, both plans
should be coordinated; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap County has established a Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SW AC) in
accordance with RCW 70.95.165 to assist in the development and review of programs and
policies concerning solid waste handling and disposal, consisting of representatives of each of
(LA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page I of I ()
the incorporated cItIes, Indian tribes, federal facilities, County Commissioner's districts,
business, and the solid waste industry; and
WHEREAS, the 1999 Kitsap County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan, as adopted
by the Kitsap County, the incorporated cities and Indian tribes within the county and approved
by the Washington State Department of Ecology, incorporates both solid waste and moderate
risk waste plans; and
WHEREAS, for solid waste and moderate risk waste planning purposes, Kitsap County attributes
to a federally-recognized Indian tribe the same status as a city, as referred to in Chapter 70.95
RCW and Chapter 70.105 RCW; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for grant application purposes to designate the lead solid waste
planning agency and for local governments participating in the solid waste management planning
process to agree to the planning process;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, it
is hereby agreed:
I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT
It is the purpose of this agreement to provide for the updating of the Kitsap County
Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan as mandated in Chapters 70.95 and
70.105 RCW, for collection, recycling and disposal of solid and moderate risk waste
produced or generated within the boundaries of Kitsap County, pursuant to the
Department of Ecology Planning Guidelines.
II. AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES
A. Kitsap County shall act as lead agency for review of the 1999 Kitsap County
Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan, and for preparation of the 2009
revised Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (CSWMP), incorporating both
solid waste and moderate risk waste elements.
B. It is understood that the planning effort will be coordinated through the Solid Waste
Advisory Committee (SW AC), and that the Department of Ecology will consider
approval of the revised CSWMP only after all local jurisdictions participating in the
planning process have adopted the revised CSWMP by resolution.
C. Responsibilities for implementation of solid waste programs (including moderate risk
waste) will be delineated in the adopted CSWMP.
D. No separate entity is being created by this Agreement.
III. FfNANCING AND BUDGET
The County shall maintain a Solid Waste Management Fund as a special fund within the County
budget. All revenues and expenses in connection with the Solid Waste Management Program
subject to this Agreement shall be budgeted and accounted for through this fund. Receipts
ILA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page 2 of 10
deposited in the Solid Waste Management Fund shall be used only for solid waste management
purposes unless otherwise required by law, grant, regulation or separate contract. Funding for
the CSWMP update process will be provided solely through the Kitsap County Solid Waste
Management Fund. Funding for plan implementation will be as stated within the Plan.
IV. PROPERTY RIGHTS
Title to all property acquired with funds from the Solid Waste Management Fund shall
vest in Kitsap County. In the event of sale of any surplus property, such funds shall be
deposited in the Solid Waste Management Fund unless otherwise required by law, grant,
regulation or contract. However, if the Solid Waste Management Fund does not require
the revenue generated by the sale of such property, it shall be disbursed to participating
jurisdictions by an agreed upon formula to be worked out at time of sale.
V. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Any disputes arising under the terms of this agreement shall be resolved through
negotiation and consensus; provided that should negotiation and consensus fail to resolve
the issue, it shall be submitted to a mediation panel consisting of the SW AC membership
for resolution. Final authority to resolve disputes shall rest with the Board of County
Commissioners subject to court review by writ of certiorari for arbitrary and capricious
action; provided that the writ is filed within thirty (30) days ofthe BOCC decision.
VI. ADMISSION OF NEW PARTIES
Additional municipal entities may be added to this Agreement upon such terms and
conditions as the participating governments and the new party agrees upon in writing.
VII. PLAN ADOPTION
The Kitsap County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan and any subsequent
plan updates shall be deemed to have been adopted when the planes) have been approved
by governing bodies (county commission, city/town councils) representing 75% of the
population (as set forth by the Washington State Office of Financial Management) of
Kitsap County.
VIII. AMENDMENTS
This document may be amended at any time following the recommendation of the Solid
Waste Advisory Committee and approval by governing bodies (county commission,
city/town councils) representing 75% of the population (as set forth by the Washington
State office of Financial Management) of Kitsap County. The process for adopting an
amendment to this agreement shall be the same as that followed for its original adoption.
(LA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page 3 of \0
IX. TERM
Commencing on the date this Agreement is last executed, it shall continue for a term of
ten (10) years.
Any party hereto may withdraw and terminate its rights and obligations under this
Agreement if it is their intention to establish their own Plan, satisfying all requirements to
do so under the applicable laws of the State of Washington. In such cases, twelve (12)
months' notice of intent to withdraw shall be given to all parties hereto.
X. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution by the Kitsap County Board of
Commissioners after execution by all other participating governments.
XI. FILING
This At,'Teement shall be filed with the Kitsap County Auditor as required by RCW
39.34.040.
This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by the parties.
Dated this day
of
2008.
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON
STEVE BAUER, Chair
JOSH BROWN, Commissioner
JAN ANGEL, Commissioner
ATTEST:
Opal Robertson, Clerk of the Board
[LA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page 4 of 10
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KC- -08
Dated this day
of
2008.
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND
Darlene Kordonowy, Mayor
ATTEST:
Rosalind Lassoff, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Paul McMurray, City Attorney
lLA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page 5 of 10
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KC- -08
Dated this day
of
2008.
CITY OF BREMERTON
Cary Bozeman, Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol Etgen, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Roger Lubovich, City Attorney
ILA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page 6 of 10
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KC- -08
Dated this day
of
2008.
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
Larry Coppola, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Merlino, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
[LA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page 7 of 10
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KC- -08
Dated this day
of
2008.
CITY OF POULSBO
Kathryn H. Quade, Mayor
ATTEST:
Karol Jones, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
James E. Haney, City Attorney
[LA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page 8 of 10
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KC- -08
Dated this day
of
2008.
PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE
Tribal Council/Tribal Manager
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Attorney
ILA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page 9 of 10
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KC- -08
Dated this day
of
2008.
SUQUAMISH TRIBE
Tribal Council! Tribal Manager
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Attorney
ILA w/KC for new CSWMP
Page 10 of 10
DATE SUBMITTED: June 18th 2008
BILL # Og- /58
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMER TON
CITY COUNCIL
5H
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: New Utility Services Contract
for PSNS/NBK-Bremerton for water,
wastewater, and stormwater services.
Committee Meeting Date: June 25th
COUNCIL MEETING Date: July 2nd
Department: Public Works &
Utilities
Presenter: Phil Williams
Phone: 473-5755
SUMMARY: The City has worked with the Navy to develop a successor contract to the ten-year
Utilities Contract for PSNS and NBK-Bremerton that expired on 12-01-2007. Since that time service
has been provided under a "Unilateral Contract" which extends to November, 2008. This proposed
new ten-year contract would extend from August 1,2008 to July 31 S\ 2018.
For Water service the initial rates are a flat fee of $39,000 per month and a variable rate of
$125/HCF. For wastewater the flat fee is $81,400/mo. and $3.08/HCF (based on metered wastewater
service). The Navy has also agreed to begin paying for stormwater service for all Navy properties that
use or benefit from city-owned stormwater infrastructure.
ATTACHMENTS: Contract # N44255-08-C-3005
FISCAL IMPACTS: Based on the assumed consumption rates listed in the contract the total
revenue for Water Utility is estimated at $1,559,500/yr. Wastewater revenue is similarly estimated at
$1,953, 160/yr. Stormwater revenue is estimated at $26,000/yr. All rates are subject to annual
escalation during the life of the contract.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
CONSENT AGENDA
GENERAL BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING D
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the proposed contract #44255-08-C-3005 with the United States Navy and authorize
the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as
presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
.
PSNS/Naval Station Bremerton Utilities Contract Summary - June 24th,
2008
Water - $37,513 + $0.96/hcf vs. $39,000 + $1.25/hcf
Sewer - $115,654 + $1.90/hcf vs. $81,400 + $3.08/hcf
@ 873,200 hcf /yr Water 8: 317,304 hcf /yr Wastewater
Before COSA
New Contract
Water
37,513 x 12 = 450,144
0.96 x 873,200 = 838,272
SubTotal = 1,288,416
39,000 x 12 = 468,000
873,200 x 1.25 = 1,091,500
SubTotal = 1,559,500
.
Wastewater
115,654 x 12 = 1,387,848
317,304 x 1.90 = 602,878
SubTotal = 1,990,726
81,400 x 12 = 976,800
317,304 x 3.08 = 977,296
SubTotal = 1,954,096
Total = $3,279,142
Total = $3,513,596
.
II. THIS CONlRACTlS A RATED ORDER I RA flNG I PAGE OF PAGES
SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD UNDER DP AS (15 CFR 700) 1 I 24
2. CONTRACT NO. 3. SOLICITATION NO. 4. WPE OF SOLICITATION 5. DATE ISSUED 6. REQUISrnON/PURCHASE NO.
[ ] SEALED BID (IFB)
N44255-08-C-:r05 [ ] NEGOTIATED (RFP)
7. ISSUED BY CODE 1 N44255 8. ADDRESS OFFER 10 (I rather than Item 7) CODE I
NA\ifAC NORTHV\EST
1101 TAUTOGCIRCLE, SUITE 203
SILIiERDAlE WA 00315-1101 See Item 7
TEL: TEL:
FAX FAX
NOTE: In sealed bid sohcitat1Clns "offer" and Itofferor"mean "bid" and Hbiddel ".
SOliCITATION
9. 5:aled offers in original and_ copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the &hedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if
handcarried, in the depository located in lIDtil local time
(Hour) (Date)
CAUTION - LATE &Jbmissions, Modifications, and WithdraV\als: 5:e 5:ction L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and
conditions contained in this solicitation.
10. FOR INFORMATION IA. NAME B. "lELEP HONE (Include area code) (NOCOlJECTCALLS) I C. E-MI\IL ADDRESS
CALL:
II. TABLE OF CONTENTS
(X)I SEe. I DE9:RIPTION P AGE(S) I (X) SEe. DE9:RIPTION P AGE(S)
PARTI-THESCHEDULE PARTII- CO NlRACT CLAUSES
X A 9JLlCIT AT ION/ CONTRACT FORM 1 X I CONTRACT CLAUSES 115 - 23
X B SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES' COSTS 2-5 PARTIII- LISTOFDOCUMENTS EXHIBITS AND OTHER AlTACHMENTS
X C DE9:RIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT 6-8 X J LIST OF ATT ACHMENTS 124
X D PACKAGING AND MARKING 9 PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
E INSPECTION AND ACCEPT ANCE K REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND
X F DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE 10 OTHER ST ATEMENTSOF OFFERORS
X G CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DAT A 11-13 L INSTRs. CONDS. ANDNOTICESTOOFFERORS
X H SPECIAL CONTRACT REOUIREMENTS 14 M EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
OFFER (Must be fullv comdetedby offeror)
NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the orovisions at 52.214-16, Minimwn Bid Acceotance Period
12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days lIDless a different period
is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon \\hich prices are offered at the price set opposite
each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.
13. Dl9:0UNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT
(5:e 5:ction I, Gause No. 52.232-8)
14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS AMENDMENT NO. DATE AMENDMENT NO. DATE
(The offeror acknowedges receipt of amendments
to the 9JLICIT A TlON for offerors and related
docwnents nwnbered and dated):
15A. NAME CODE I 04DN7 I FACILITY! 04DN7 16, NAME AND TITLE OF PER9JN AUTHORIZED TO
AND CITY OF BREMERTON
. SIGN OFFER (Type or print)
ADDRESS 31270LYMPUSDR
OF BREMERTON WA 00310-479:l
OFFEROR
158. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) I 15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS 17. SIGNATURE 18. OFFER DATE
o IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER
360-478-5315 SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.
AWARD (1'0 be conn: eted bv Go~rnment)
19. ACCEPTED AS'm ITEMS NUMBERED 120. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION
$0.00
22. AUTHORIW FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPFn-nON: 23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN liTEM
0 10 U.S.e. 2304(c)( ) 0 41 U.S.e.253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)
24. ADMINISTERED BY (lrolher than Item7) CODE I 25. PA YMENTWILL BE MADE BY CODE I
See Item 7
26. NI~ OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNI1ED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE
TEL: F.M"--TL : (Signature orContracting Officer)
IMPORT ANT - AV\ard will be made on this Form or on Standard Form 26 or hv other authorized official V>ritten notice.
Pre\ ious Edition IS Unusable
33-134
STANDARD FOR1\133 (REV. 9-97)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.21-1(c)
Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES
0001
QUANTITY
10
UNIT
Years
UNIT PRICE
POTABLE WATER - BNC
FFP
Provide potable water to Bremerton Naval Complex (BNC), Bremerton,
Washington. Water flow volume shall be measured through City of Bremerton
meter located at 1st and Pacific; City of Bremerton meter located at Charleston
Gate; and City of Bremerton meter located at 1st and Rainier Avenue. City of
Bremerton utility accounts 1300030, 1300040, and 1300050 apply to this CLIN.
CLIN 000 I rate design is based on mutually negotiated cost of service study.
CLIN 0001 estimated component rates for 2008 are found at contract provision
B.I, Rate Structure.
FOB: Destination
NET AMT
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES
0002
QUANTITY
10
UNIT
Years
UNIT PRICE
SEWAGE SERVICE - BNC
FFP
Provide sewage disposal and treatment for Bremerton Naval Complex (BNC),
Bremerton, Washington. Sewage flow volume will be measured through City of
Bremerton meter located at 143 1st Street; and City of Bremerton meter located at
416 S. Cambrian Avenue. City of Bremerton utility accounts 1300090, 1300100,
and 1300120 apply to this CLIN. Deductions from account 1300090 to address
City water flow into Navy sewage system shall be applied as described in contract
provision B.2. Addition of Navy sewage flow from Montgomery Guard Shack
into City sewer system shall be applied to account 1300010 as described in
contract provision B.3. CLIN 0002 rate design is based on mutually negotiated
cost of service study. CLIN 0002 component rates for 2008 are found at contract
provision B.l, Rate Structure.
FOB: Destination
NET AMT
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 2 of 24
AMOUNT
$0.00
AMOUNT
$0.00
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 3 of 24
ITEM NO
0003
SUPPLIES/SERVICES
UNIT
Years
UNIT PRICE
AMOUNT
QUANTITY
10
WATER AND SEWER, BLDG 981 BNC
FFP
Provide potable water and sewage service for Building 981, Pass and ID,
Bremerton Naval Complex (BNC), Bremerton, Washington. Water flow volume
is measured through City of Bremerton water meter. City of Bremerton utility
account 4655650 applies to this CLIN. Price for metered water shall be based on
City of Bremerton within city 2" meters size as found in City of Bremerton
Municipal Code 15.06, Appendix A, Retail Water Service Rates. Price for sewage
is based on City of Bremerton Commercial 1 within city rates as found in City of
Bremerton Municipal Code 15.06, Appendix A, Retail Wastewater Service Rates.
Sewer flow is equivalent to water flow for the CLIN.
FOB: Destination
NET AMT
$0.00
CLIN DESCRIPTION
B. 1 RATE STRUCTURE. The base period water and sewer rates shall be in accordance with the
mutually negotiated structures and formulas as found in Attachment 1.1, Summary of Final Negotiations
and Rate Analysis for the City of Bremerton and U.S. Navy Wholesale Water and Sewer Rates, March
2008. As found in Attachment 1.1, the rate design used to establish the base period rate for CLIN 0001
assumed a 30% fixed component and a 70% variable component. The rate design used to establish the
base period rate for CLIN 0002 assumed a 50% fixed component and a 50% variable component. The
actual ratio of fixed to variable revenues is a function of the Navy's volumetric use, which may vary over
time during the contract term. Water and sewer rates established for the base period of subj ect contract
beginning 01 August 2008 are:
CLIN 0001: Price for metered water shall be a fixed monthly charge of $39,000 and a
volumetric charge of$1.25/hundred cubic feet (hcf). The volumetric charge
is applied to total of all billable units upon approval of the invoices. Any Future
adjustment of CLIN 0001 rates shall be in accordance with provision B.3, Future
Adjustment of Rates.
CLIN 0002: Price for metered sewage shall be a fixed monthly charge of $81 ,400 and a
volumetric charge of$3.08/hundred cubic feet (hcf). The volumetric charge
is applied to total of all billable units upon approval of the invoices. Any future
adjustment ofCLIN 0002 rates shall be in accordance with contract provision B.3,
Future Adjustment of Rates.
CLIN 0003: Price for metered water and sewer service shall be in accordance with
the City of Bremerton (City) Commercial 1 within-city water rate for 2" meter and
Commercial I within-city wastewater rate based on measured flow through
2" meter in accordance with Attachment 1.3., Appendix A to City of
Bremerton Municipal Code 15.06, Assessments, Rates, Fees and Charges.
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 4 of 24
Future adjustment of CLlN 0003 rates shall be based on new ordnance rates as
approved by City for Commercial 1 water and wastewater within-city rates.
B.2 CLIN 0002. CITY ACCOUNT #1300090. DEDUCTIONS FOR CITY WATER
FLOW INTO NAVY SEWAGE SYSTEM PRIOR TO EXIT OF NAVY
WASTEWATER DISCHARGE THROUGH CITY METER LOCATED AT 1431sT
STREET (EAST END OF BNC).
The parties mutually agree to the following deductions:
(1) The City has installed a water meter that measures full flow from the Naval Museum and Fountain
Room. This measured flow will be deducted from CLIN 0002 on each monthly invoice for City
Account #1300090.
(2) The City will install a water meter to measure flow from the Harborside public restrooms. This
measured flow will be deducted from CLlN 0002 on each monthly invoice for City Account
#1300090.
(3) The City shall deduct an estimated water discharge from the Harborside Fountain Park pump room
overflow. The parties mutually agree that a monthly average of 18 hundred cubic feet (hct) shall be
deducted from CLIN 0002 on each monthly invoice for City Account #1300090.
B.3 CLIN 0002. ACCOUNT #1300100. ADDITION OF ESTIMATED SEWAGE FLOW
FROM THE NAVY'S MONTGOMERY AVENUE GUARD SHACK INTO CITY'S
WASTEWATER STREAM (WEST END OF BNC).
The parties mutually agree that sewage flow produced from the Montgomery Avenue Guard
Shack has not been previously measured or properly invoiced. The parties agree to add an
estimated 3 hundred cubic feet (hct) on each monthly invoice for City Account #13000100.
B.3 FUTURE RATE ADJUSTMENTS.
CLIN 0001 and CLlN 0002: Any adjustment ofCLlN 0001 and 0002 rates beyond
calendar year 2008 shall be accomplished in accordance with the mutually negotiated rationale
and formulas as found in attachment J.2, contract N44255-08-C-3005, Methodology For
Adjustment of Water and Wastewater Rates.
The parties agree that the baseline usage provided at the beginning of the contract by the City of
Bremerton shall not change during the entire contract term. Only rates and revenues as developed and
incorporated into Attachment J.2 may change for purposes of future adjustments. The baseline usages for
water and wastewater, respectively, are found in Attachment J.2 under the water and wastewater
spreadsheets titled "Base Year Calculations ".
The City shall provide any revised rates and revenues for Navy review in accordance with
Attachment J.2 no less than 30 days prior to the effective date of any such adjustments. It is
anticipated that future rate adjustments will normally become effective 01 January.
CLlN 0003: Adjustment of CLlN 0003 rates beyond calendar year 2008 shall be in accordance
with amended City of Bremerton Commercial 1 rates as may be codified through revisions to
Appendix A to City of Bremerton Municipal Code 15.06, Assessments, Rates, Fees and Charges. It is
anticipated that future rate adjustments will normally become effective 01 January.
All adjustments to CLlNs 0001, 0002, and 0003, are subject to the provisions of FAR Clause
52.241-8, "Change in Rates or Terms and Conditions of Service for Unregulated Services.
B.4 CONTRACT EFFECTIVE DATE. The base year rate effective date is 01 Aug 2008
and shall continue until 31 July 2018, unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the
parties through contract modification.
REST OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 5 of 24
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 6 of 24
Section C - Descriptions and Specifications
STATEMENT OF WORK
c.t GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. The City of Bremerton (City) shall provide all labor, supervision,
tools, equipment, and transportation necessary to deliver the services required under this contract.
C.2 PREMISES TO BE SERVED. The premises to be served are collectively known as the Bremerton
Naval Complex (BNe). For purposes of this contract, the BNC facilities to be served consist of:
Naval Base Kitsap (NBK) Bremerton
120 South Dewey Street
Bremerton, W A 98314-5020
Puget Sound Navy Shipyard (PSNS)/ Intermediate Maintenance Facility (IMF)
1400 Farragut Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98314-5001
The facilities to be provided water and sewer service under CLIN 0001, 0002, and 0003 are detailed in two
Department of Navy, Facilities Engineering Command NW drawings (as may be further revised):
Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, W A, "Sanitary Sewer, CHT & Pressure Sewer Systems, Bremerton Naval
Complex, PWD Drawing No. 57849, revised May 2,2006, and
Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, W A, "Utility Map, Freshwater Distribution System, Bremerton Naval
Complex, PWD Drawing No. 53935, revised March 31,2005.
Subject to appropriate security reviews and approvals, copies of these drawings will be provided by the Navy
to the City of Bremerton upon request.
C.3 ESTIMATED SERVICE. Estimated annual water consumption:
CLIN 0001 - 873,280 hundred cubic feet (hct)
CLIN 0003 - 50 hundred cubic feet (hct)
Estimated annual sewage capacity requirements:
CLIN 0002 - 317,304 hundred cubic feet (hct)
CA POINT OF CONNECTION/LOCATION.
Water service: Water shall be delivered at the following meter locations:
1. First Street and Pacific Avenue
2. Charleston Gate
3. First Street and Rainier Avenue
4. State Highway 304, Pass and ID Building #981
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 7 of 24
Sewer Service: the City shall receive sewage at the following points of delivery:
1. 416 S. Cambrian Avenue (upstream of the City's Cambrian Avenue flow metering
vault (MS4) located on the site of the City's pump station WB-3
2. 143 First Street (at the City's First Street flow metering vault (MS5)
3. State Highway 304, Pass and ID Building #981
Attachment JA, Water and Wastewater Utility Location, Accounts and Meters, Bremerton Naval
Complex, is provided as further reference. Should the City replace any meter providing water or
wastewater services to the Navy, the City shall notify the Contracting Officer of such replacement,
including the new meter number, within 30 days of initiation of use of the replacement meter.
The Contracting Officer shall revise, through modification to the contract, the applicable meter numbers
cited in Section B, Section C, and Attachment 1.4 of this contract.
C.S DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE.
(a) WATER:
The City shall provide at its expense all necessary facilities and permits required to connect the City of
Bremerton water distribution system to the Government water system at the points of delivery specified
in this contract for the purpose of providing reliable water service to NBK Bremerton and PSNS/IMF.
The City shall take all reasonable efforts to continuously provide 2,500 gallons per minute of water at a
pressure of75 pounds per square inch gauge (psig) at each of the three points of delivery. Water shall
be measured through three 10" meters. The water supplied will be clear, potable, and safe for human
consumption and in accordance with the applicable standards as promulgated by, and as may be revised
by, Federal, state, and local agencies having regulatory authority.
(b) SEWER:
The City shall provide at its expense all necessary facilities and permits required to receive, carry, treat, and
dispose of sewage from NBK Bremerton and PSNS/IMF at the points of delivery specified in this contract. The
City shall receive, carry, treat, and dispose of sewage in a manner, and by such means, as will not constitute a
hazard to the public health. The City shall operate its sewage facilities in conformity with applicable laws, rules,
and regulations as promulgated by, and as may be revised by, Federal, state, and local agencies having regulatory
authority.
The amount of sewage discharged by the Navy to the City for treatment, reclamation, or disposal through the
Cambrian Avenue discharge points shall not exceed a daily average flow of 1,800 gallons per minute (gpm) or a
total daily volume of 2.59 million gallons a day (mgd) except that a peak discharge of 2,500 gpm will be
allowable. The amount of sewage discharged to the City for treatment, reclamation, or disposal through the First
Street discharge point shall not exceed an average daily flow of 300 gpm or a total daily volume of 0043 mgd
except that a peak discharge of 500 gpm will be allowable. Flow shall be measured through two 6" meters and
one 10" meter.
C.6 The Navy hereby grants to the City of Bremerton a revocable permit to enter the service location
for any work related to the requirements under this contract. Authorized representatives of the City will
be allowed access to the facility at suitable times to perform the obligations of the utility service contract.
It is expressly understood that the Navy may limit or restrict the right of access herein granted in
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 8 of 24
any manner considered to be necessary for the national security. City personnel requiring base access
will obtain appropriate badging and identification as may be required by the Government.
C.7 OPERATIONAL COORDINATION MEETINGS.
The parties agree that an operational coordination meeting will be held between the City and Navy no
less than every six months during the term of the contract. More frequent meetings may be scheduled as
appropriate. The purpose of these meetings is to facilitate increased communication and coordination
among the parties on such issues as significant changes to operational procedures, planned outages or
flushing operations, maintenance requirements, review of key technical criteria or data associated with
utility operations, upgrade or replacement of equipment or infrastructure, conservation initiatives, and
other issues that may substantially impact the quality or level of service requirements. The meetings will
be scheduled by the Utilities Program Manager of Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest ~
Bremerton (NA VF ACNW - Bremerton) and will be co-chaired by the Utilities Program Manager of
NA VF ACNW Bremerton and the City of Bremerton Public Works Director or their designated
representatives.
C.S CONTACT AND NOTIFICATION LISTS.
The parties agree that a contact and notification list of key personnel for the Navy and City shall be
maintained. This list of personnel is found at Attachment J.5, Key Utility Personnel Contact List,
Bremerton Naval Complex and City of Bremerton. This list will be revised as necessary but no less than
once every six months. Update of this list will be a part of the agenda for the bi-annual Operational
Coordination Meetings.
C.9 TERM.
This contract shall continue in effect for a period of 10 years beginning 01 August 2008 or
until terminated at the option of the Government by giving written notice not less than 30 days in advance
of the effective date of termination.
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.232-18
Availability Of Funds
APR 1984
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 9 of 24
Section D - Packaging and Marking
PACKAGING AND MARKING
SECTION D - PACKAGING AND MARKING
This section is not applicable
Rest of page intentionally left blank
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 10 of24
Section F - Deliveries or Performance
DELIVERY INFORMATION
CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS VIC
0001 01-MAY-2008 10 N/A
FOB: Destination
0002 01-MAY-2008 10 N/A
FOB: Destination
0003 01-MAY-2008 10 N/A
FOB: Destination
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 11 of24
Section G - Contract Administration Data
ACCOUNTING INSTRUCTIONS
G.! PAYMENTS. The City shall be paid by the designated disbursing office for services furnished under the
contract at the rates specified. All bills for regular monthly service shall be paid according to the Prompt
Payment Act. The Government shall be entitled to any discounts customarily applicable to payment of bills by
all customers of the City under like conditions of service. The Government shall notify the City, in writing,
within 30 days following receipt of any dispu'ted billing. The Government may pay the disputed billings in full
under protest, pending a negotiated resolution pursuant to an appropriate audit, if required, and in accordance
with the Disputes Clause of the contract.
G.2 INVOICES. Invoices for water and sewage service provided under CLINS 0001, 0002, and 0003 shall
contain statements of the meter readings at the beginning and end of the billing period, including the
consumption during the billing period. Invoices will also clearly state the negotiated rate(s) or City rate
applied to the appropriate CLINs. The invoice shall contain the Navy contract number, N44255-08-C-3005;
the individual city utility account; and applicable meter numbers. The fixed and volumetric components of the
appropriate rate(s) shall be clearly identified for each account. Deductions and Additions to CLIN 0002 in
accordance with contract provisions B.2 and B.3 shall be clearly identified. Water and sewage billing shall be
on a monthly basis. Submit invoices to:
U.S Navy
(Insert Government Account Number)
P.O. Box 30088
College Station, Texas 77842-3088
GOVERNMENT
Utility Account ACCOUNT
Number NUMBER Contract No. Service Location Site Name
1300030 NW 43 (TBD) N44255-08-C-3005 1 st and Pacific Bremerton
1300040 NW 43 (TBD) N44255-08-C-3005 Charleston Gate Bremerton
1 st Street &
1300050 NW 43 FW 00007 N44255-08-C-3005 Rainier Ave. Bremerton
143 1 st Avenue -
1300090 NW 43 (TBD) N44255-08-C-3005 MS5 Bremerton
416 S. Cambrian
1300100 NW 43 SE 00004 N44255-08-C-3005 A venue - MS4 Bremerton
416 S. Cambrian
1300120 NW 43 (TBD) N44255-08-C-3005 A venue - MS4 Bremerton
State Highway 304
Pass & ID Bldg
4655650 NW 43 SE 00002 N44255-08-C-3005 981 Bremerton
- -
State Highwa,,- 304
Pass & ID Bldg
4655650 NW 43 FW 00002 N44255-08-C-3005 981 Bremerton
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 12 of24
G.3 OTHER COMMUNICATION.
All other communication regarding this contract shall be addressed as follows:
Utility Service Provider City of Bremerton
Attn: Public Works Department
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, WA 98310-4799
Govell1illent: Department of Navy
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest
Attention: Utilities Contracts
1101 T autog Circle
Silverdale, WA 98315-1101
GA. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA.
The Certifying Official shall cite funding for recurring services on each invoice. Nonrecurring services will
normally be procured through contract modification and shall be separately invoiced.
G.5 ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES.
The City shall comply with the requirements of the latest revised Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Circular A-87, "Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribe Governments".
Compliance with OMB Circular A-87 will be monitored through Navy review of the periodic reports
generated by the Budgeting, Accounting, and Reporting System (BARS) of the Washington State
Auditor's Office.
G.6 RATE CHANGES.
The City shall notify the Navy of any rate changes as far in advance as is reasonable. Changes in
rates or terms and conditions of service are subject to the provisions of FAR Clause 52.241-8,
"Change in Rates or Terms and Conditions of Service for Unregulated Services (Feb 1995).
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 13 of 24
NA VFAC 5252.201-9300 CONTRACTING OFFICER AUTHORITY (JUN 1994)
In no event shall any understanding or agreement between the Contractor and any Government
employee other than the Contracting Officer on any contract, modification, change order, letter or verbal
direction to the Contractor be effective or binding upon the Government. All such actions must be
formalized by a proper contractual document executed by an appointed Contracting Officer. The
Contractor is hereby put on notice that in the event a Government employee other than the Contracting
Officer directs a change in the work to be performed or increases the scope of the work to be performed, it
is the Contractor's responsibility to make inquiry of the Contracting Officer before making the deviation.
Payments will not be made without being authorized by an appointed Contracting Officer with the legal
authority to bind the Government. (End of clause)
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 14 of24
Section H - Special Contract Requirements
SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
H.1 SEWAGE SAMPLING. The City shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements for
sewage monitoring and sampling. The City, at a minimum, shall conduct sewage sampling on a monthly basis.
Copies of reports of sampling analyses shall be provided to BNC, Code 106.
H.2 ANNUAL RATE REVIEWS. Annual rate reviews may be conducted by the Government in accordance
with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 41.401, "Monthly and Annual Review". Notwithstanding
mutually negotiated rates for this contract, these annual rate reviews may constitute grounds for rate redetermination
in accordance with the requirements of FAR Part 41.401.
H.3 METERS. The parties agree that the City shall furnish, install, maintain, repair, calibrate, and read all meters
associated with the City's performance requirements under this contract in accordance with FAR Clause 52.241-6,
Service Provisions,. The parties agree that in the event any meter is determined through inspection, testing, or other
means to not be operable or otherwise not in compliance, the City shall either repair or replace such meter within 60
days. Should such repair or replacement not be feasible, the parties shall negotiate a mutually agreeable estimate of
flow to be used for billing purposes. Estimated flow calculations must be negotiated within 60 days from date
meter has been determined to be noncompliant or inoperable.
H.4 COST OF SERVICE STUDY. The parties agree that the Summary of the Final Negotiations and Rate
Analyses for the City of Bremerton and the U.S. Navy Wholesale Water and Sewer Rates, Attachment 1.2,
constitutes the basis for development of the 2008 base year rates for this contract. It is further contemplated by the
parties that a follow-up cost of service study will be completed and available for mutual review by the parties not
less than one year from the end of this contract term.
Section I - Contract Clauses
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.202-1
52.203-3
52.203-5
52.203-7
52.203-8
52.203-10
52.203-12
52.204-4
52.204-7
52.209-6
52.215-17
52.215-21
52.219-8
52.222-1
52.222-3
52.222-4
52.222-21
52.222-35
52.222-36
52.222-37
52.222-39
52.223-5
52.223-5 Alt II
52.223-6
52.225-13
52.232-1
52.232-11
52.232-17
52.232-23
52.232-25
52.232-33
52.233-1
52.233-3
52.233-4
52.237-2
52.237-3
Definitions
Gratuities
Covenant Against Contingent Fees
Anti-Kickback Procedures
Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal
or Improper Activity
Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity JAN 1997
Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal SEP 2005
Transactions
Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Recycled Paper
Central Contractor Registration
Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting
With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for
Debarment
Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of Money OCT 1997
Requirements for Cost or Pricing Data or Information Other OCT 1997
Than Cost or Pricing Data--Modifications
Utilization of Small Business Concerns
Notice To The Government Of Labor Disputes
Convict Labor
Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act - Overtime
Compensation
Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities FEB 1999
Equal Opportunity For Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans SEP 2006
of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans
Affirmative Action For Workers With Disabilities JUN 1998
Employment Reports On Special Disabled Veterans, VeteransSEP 2006
Of The Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans
Notification of Employee Rights Concerning Payment of
Union Dues or Fees
Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information AUG 2003
Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information (Aug AUG 2003
2002) Alt II
Drug-Free Workplace
Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases
Payments
Extras
Interest
Assignment Of Claims
Prompt Payment
Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--Centra1 Contractor
Registration
Disputes
Protest After Award
Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim
Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And
Vegetation
Continuity Of Services
JUL 2004
APR 1984
APR 1984
JUL 1995
JAN 1997
AUG 2000
JUL 2006
SEP 2006
MAY 2004
FEB 1997
JUN 2003
JUL 2005
DEC 2004
MAY 2001
FEB 2006
APR 1984
APR 1984
JUN 1996
JAN 1986
MAR 2001
OCT 2003
JUL 2002
AUG 1996
OCT 2004
APR 1984
JAN 1991
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 15 of24
Order of Precedence - Utilities
Change in Class of Service
Contractor's Facilities
Multiple Service Locations
Notice ofIntent to Disallow Costs
Bankruptcy
Changes--Fixed Price (Aug 1987) - Alternate I
Competition In Subcontracting
Subcontracts for Commercial Items
Preference for Privately Owned U.S. - Flag Commercial
Vessels
Termination For Convenience Of The Government (Fixed
Price) (May 2004) - Alternate II
Default (Fixed-Price Supply & Service)
Computer Generated Forms
Prohibition On Persons Convicted of Fraud or Other
Defense-Contract -Related Felonies
252.203-7002 Display Of DOD Hotline Poster
252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product
252.204-7004 Alt A Central Contractor Registration (52.204-7) Alternate A
252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled
By The Government of a Terrorist Country
Pricing Adjustments
Prohibition On Storage And Disposal Of Toxic And
Hazardous Materials
Government Access
Pricing Of Contract Modifications
Requests for Equitable Adjustment
Transportation of Supplies by Sea
52.241-2
52.241-4
52.241-5
52.241-11
52.242-1
52.242-13
52.243-1 Alt I
52.244-5
52.244-6
52.247-64
52.249-2 Alt II
52.249-8
52.253-1
252.203-7001
252.215-7000
252.223-7006
252.241-7001
252.243-7001
252.243-7002
252.247-7023
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
FEB 1995
FEB 1995
FEB 1995
FEB 1995
APR 1984
JUL 1995
APR 1984
DEC 1996
MAR 2007
FEB 2006
SEP 1996
APR 1984
IAN 1991
DEC 2004
DEC 1991
APR 1992
NOV 2003
MAR 1998
DEC 1991
APR 1993
DEC 1991
DEC 1991
MAR 1998
MAY 2002
52.215-8 ORDER OF PRECEDENCE--UNIFORM CONTRACT FORMAT (OCT 1997)
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 16 of24
Any inconsistency in this solicitation or contract shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order:
(a) The Schedule (excluding the specifications).
(c) Contract clauses.
(b) Representations and other instructions.
(d) Other documents, exhibits, and attachments.
( e) The sp~cifications.
(End of clause)
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 17 of24
52.222-26 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (MAR 2007) ALTERNATE I (FEB 1999)
Notice. The following terms of this clause are waived for this contract: No Terms Are Waived.
Definition. United States, as used in this clause, means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the
Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Wake Island.
~
(b)(1) If, during any l2-month period (including the 12 months preceding the award of this contract), the Contractor
has been or is awarded nonexempt Federal contracts and/or subcontracts that have an aggregate value in excess of
$10,000, the Contractor shall comply with this clause, except for work performed outside the United States by
employees who were not recruited within the United States. Upon request, the Contractor shall provide information
necessary to determine the applicability of this clause.
(2) If the Contractor is a religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society, the requirements of
this clause do not apply with respect to the employment of individuals of a particular religion to perform work
connected with the carrying on of the Contractor's activities (41 CFR 60-1.5).
(c) (1) The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,
color, religion, sex, or national origin. However, it shall not be a violation of this clause for the Contractor to extend
a publicly announced preference in employment to Indians living on or near an Indian reservation, in connection
with employment opportunities on or near an Indian reservation, as permitted by 41 CFR 60-1.5.
(2) The Contractor shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are
treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This shall include,
but not be limited to, (i) employment, (ii) upgrading, (iii) demotion, (iv) transfer, (v) recruitment or recruitment
advertising, (vi) layoff or termination, (vii) rates of payor other forms of compensation, and (viii) selection for
training, including apprenticeship.
(3) The Contractor shall post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment the
notices to be provided by the Contracting Officer that explain this clause.
(4) The Contractor shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the
Contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race,
color, religion, sex, or national origin.
(5) The Contractor shall send, to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective
bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, the notice to be provided by the Contracting Officer
advising the labor union or workers' representative of the Contractor's commitments under this clause, and post
copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
(6) The Contractor shall comply with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the rules, regulations, and orders of
the Secretary of Labor.
(7) The Contractor shall furnish to the contracting agency all information required by Executive Order 11246, as
amended, and by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor. The Contractor shall also file Standard
Form 100 (EEO-l), or any successor form, as prescribed in 41 CFR part 60-1. Unless the Contractor has filed
within the 12 months preceding the date of contract award, the Contractor shall, within 30 days after contract
award, apply to either the regional Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) or the local office of
the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for the necessary forms.
(8) The Contractor shall permit access to its premises, during normal business hours, by the contracting agency or
the OFCCP for the purpose of conducting on-site compliance evaluations and complaint investigations. The
Contractor shall permit the Government to inspect and copy any books, accounts, records (including computerized
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 18 of24
records), and other material that may be relevant to the matter under investigation and pertinent to compliance with
Executive Order 11246, as amended, and rules and regulations that implement the Executive Order.
(9) If the OFCCP determines that the Contractor is not in compliance with this clause or any rule, regulation, or
order of the Secretary of Labor, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the
Contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts, under the procedures authorized in
Executive Order 11246, as amended. In addition, sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked against the
Contractor as provided in Executive Order 11246, as amended; in the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary
of Labor; or as otherwise provided by law.
(10) The Contractor shall include the terms and conditions of this clause in every subcontract or purchase order that
is not exempted by the rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued under Executive Order 11246,
as amended, so that these terms and conditions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor.
(11) The Contractor shall take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the contracting
officer may direct as a means of enforcing these terms and conditions, including sanctions for noncompliance;
provided, that if the Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor
as a result of any direction, the Contractor may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the
interests of the United States.
(c) Notwithstanding any other clause in this contract, disputes relative to this clause will be governed by the
procedures in 41 CFR 60-1.1.
(End of clause)
52.241-3 SCOPE AND DURATION OF CONTRACT (FEB 1995)
(a) For the period 01 August 2008 through 31 July 2018 the Contractor agrees to furnish and the Government
agrees to purchase water and sewer utility service in accordance with the applicable tariff(s), rules, and regulations
as approved by the applicable governing regulatory body and as set forth in the contract.
(b) It is expressly understood that neither the Contractor nor the Government is under any obligation to continue
any service under the terms and conditions of this contract beyond the expiration date.
(c) The Contractor shall provide the Government with one complete set of rates, terms, and conditions of service
which are in effect as of the date of this contract and any subsequently approved rates.
(d) The Contractor shall be paid at the applicable rate(s) under the tariff and the Government shall be liable for the
minimum monthly charge, if any, specified in this contract commencing with the period in which service is initially
furnished and continuing for the term of this contract. Any minimum monthly charge specified in this contract shall
be equitably prorated for the periods in which commencement and termination of this contract become effective.
(End of clause)
52.241-6 SERVICE PROVISIONS (FEB 1995)
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 19 of24
(a) Measurement of service. (1) All service furnished by the Contractor shall be measured by suitable metering
equipment of standard manufacture, to be furnished, installed, maintained, repaired, calibrated, and read by the
Contractor at its expense. When more than a single meter is installed at a service location, the readings thereof may
be billed conjunctively, if appropriate. In the event any meter fails to register (or registers incorrectly) the service
furnished, the parties shall agree upon the length of time of meter malfunction and the quantity of service delivered
during such period of time. An appropriate adjustment shall be made to the next invoice for the purpose of
correcting such errors. However, any meter which registers not more than 3% percent slow or fast shall be deemed
correct.
(2) The Contractor shall read all meters at periodic intervals of approximately 30 days or in accordance with the
policy of the cognizant regulatory body or applicable bylaws. All billings based on meter readings of shorter
duration than the normal billing cycle shall be prorated accordingly.
(b) Meter test. (1) The Contractor, at its expense, shall periodically inspect and test Contractor-installed meters
larger than 3" diameter every two (2) years, meters 1 Y2 " to 2" diameter at intervals not exceeding four (4) years.
Meters 1" diameter and smaller shall be inspected and tested at intervals not exceeding five (5) years. The
Government has the right to have representation during the inspection and test.
(2) At the written request of the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall make additional tests of any or all such
meters in the presence of Government representatives. The cost of such additional tests shall be borne by the
Government if the percentage of errors is found to be not more than 3% percent slow or fast.
(3) No meter shall be placed in service or allowed to remain in service which has an error in registration in excess
of 3% percent under normal operating conditions.
(c) Change in volume or character. Reasonable notice shall be given by the Contracting Officer to the Contractor
regarding any material changes anticipated in the volume or characteristics of the utility service required at each
location.
(d) Continuity of service and consumption. The Contractor shall use reasonable diligence to provide a regular and
uninterrupted supply of service at each service location, but shall not be liable for damages, breach of contract or
otherwise, to the Government for failure, suspension, diminution, or other variations of service occasioned by or in
consequence of any cause beyond the control of the Contractor, including but not limited to acts of God or of the
public enemy, fires, floods, earthquakes, or other catastrophe, strikes, or failure or breakdown of transmission or
other facilities. If any such failure, suspension, diminution, or other variation of service shall aggregate more than 8
hour(s) during any billing period hereunder, an equitable adjustment shall be made in the monthly billing specified
in this contract (including the minimum monthly charge).
(End of clause)
52.241-8 CHANGE IN RATES OR TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE FOR UNREGULATED
SERVICES (FEB 1995)
(a) This clause applies to the extent that services furnished hereunder are not subject to regulation by a regulatory
body.
(b) After one hundred eighty (180) days, either party may request a change in rates or terms and conditions of
service, unless otherwise provided in this contract. Both parties agree to enter in negotiations concerning such
changes upon receipt of a written request detailing the proposed changes and specifying the reasons for the
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 20 of 24
proposed changes.
(c) The effective date of any change shall be as agreed to by the parties. The Contractor agrees that throughout the
life of this contract the rates so negotiated will not be in excess of published and unpublished rates charged to any
other customer of the same class under similar tenns and conditions of use and service.
(d) The failure of the parties to agree upon any change after a reasonable period of time shall be a dispute under the
Disputes clause of this contract.
(e) Any changes to rates, terms, or conditions as a result of such negotiations shall be made a part of this contract by
the issuance of a contract modification.
(End of clause)
52.241-9 CONNECTION CHARGE (FEB 1995)
(a) Charge. In consideration of the Contractor furnishing and installing at its expense the new connection facilities
described herein, the Government shall pay the Contractor a connection charge. The payment shall be in the form of
progress payments, advance payments or as a lump sum, as agreed to by the parties and as permitted by applicable
law. The total amount payable shall be either the estimated cost of $(As negotiated for each modification applicable
to connection charges) less the agreed to salvage value of $(as negotiated for each modification applicable to
connection charges), or the actual cost less the salvage value, whichever is less. As a condition precedent to final
payment, the Contractor shall execute a release of any claims against the Government arising under or by the virtue
of such installation.
(b) Ownership, operation, maintenance and repair of new facilities to be provided. The facilities to be supplied by
the Contractor under this clause, notwithstanding the payment by the Government of a connection charge, shall be
and remain the property of the Contractor and shall, at all times during the life of this contract or any renewals
thereof, be operated, maintained, and repaired by the Contractor at its expense. All taxes and other charges in
connection therewith, together with all liability arising out of the construction, operations, maintenance, or repair of
such facilities, shall be the obligation of the Contractor.
(c) Credits. (1) The Contractor agrees to allow the Government, on each monthly bill for service furnished under
this contract to the service location, a credit of (as negotiated for each modification applicable to connection
charges) percent of the amount of each such bill as rendered until the accumulation of credits shall equal the amount
of such connection charge, provided that the Contractor may at any time allow a credit up to 100 percent of the
amount of each such bill.
(2) In the event the Contractor, before any termination of this contract but after completion of the facilities provided
for in this clause, serves any customer other than the Government (regardless of whether the Government is being
served simultaneously, intermittently, or not at all) by means of these facilities, the Contractor shall promptly notify
the Government in writing. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing at that time, the Contractor shall
promptly accelerate the credits provided for under subparagraph (c)( 1) of this clause, up to 100 percent of each
monthly bill until there is refunded the amount that reflects the Govenunent's connection costs for that portion of
the facilities used in serving others.
(3) In the event the Contractor terminates this contract, or defaults in performance, prior to full credit of any
connection charge paid by the Government, the Contractor shall pay to the Government an amount equal to the
uncredited balance of the connection charge as of the date of the tern1ination or default.
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 21 of24
(d) Termination before completion offacilities. The Government reserves the right to terminate this contract at any
time before completion of the facilities with respect to which the Government is to pay a connection charge. In the
event the Government exercises this right, the Contractor shall be paid the cost of any work accomplished,
including direct and indirect costs reasonably allocable to the completed work prior to the time of termination by
the Government, plus the cost of removal, less the salvage value.
(e) Termination after completion offacilities. In the event the Government terminates this contract after completion
of the facilities with respect to which the Government has paid a connection charge, but before the crediting in full
by the Contractor of any connection charge in accordance with the terms of this contract, the Contractor shall have
the following options:
(1) To retain in place for (as negotiated for each modification applicable to connection charges) months after the
notice of termination by the Government such facilities on condition that--
(i) If, during such (as negotiated for each modification for applicable connection charges) month period, the
Contractor serves any other customer by means of such facilities, the Contractor, shall, in lieu of allowing credits,
pay the Government during such period installments in like amount, manner, and extent as the credit provided for
under paragraph (c) of this clause before such termination; and
(ii) Immediately after such (as negotiated for each modification applicable to connection charges) month period the
Contractor shall promptly pay in full to the Government the uncredited balance of the connection charge.
(2) To remove such facilities at the Contractor's own expense within (as negotiated for each modification applicable
to connection charges) months after the effective date of the termination by the Government. If the Contractor elects
to remove such facilities, the Government shall then have the option of purchasing such facilities at the agreed
salvage value set forth herein; and provided further, that the Contractor shall, at the direction of the Government,
leave in place such facilities located on Government property which the Government elects to purchase at the
agreed salvage value.
(End of clause)
52.241-10 TERMINATION LIABILITY (FEB 1995)
(a) If the Government discontinues utility service under this contract before completion of the facilities cost
recovery period specified in paragraph (b) of this clause, in consideration of the Contractor furnishing and installing
at its expense, the new facility described herein, the Government shall pay termination charges, calculated as set
forth in this clause.
(b) Facility cost recovery period. The period of time, not exceeding the term of this contract, during which the net
cost of the new facility, shall be recovered by the Contractor is--
(As mutually negotiated by the parties)
(c) Net facility cost. The cost of the new facility, less the agreed upon salvage value of such facility, is--
$(As mutually negotiated by the parties)
(d) Monthly facility cost recovery rate. The monthly facility cost recovery rate which the Government shall pay the
Contractor whether or not service is received is--
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 22 of 24
$(As mutually negotiated by the parties)
(e) Termination charges. Termination charges = $(As mutually negotiated by the parties)
(f) If the Contractor has recovered its capital costs at the time of termination there will be no temlination liability
charge.
(End of clause)
52.241-12 NONREFUNDABLE, NONRECURRING SERVICE CHARGE (FEB 1995)
As provided herein, the Government will pay a nonrefundable, nonrecurring charge when the rules and regulations
of a Contractor require that a customer pay (1) a charge for the initiation of service, (2) a contribution in aid of
construction, or (3) a nonrefundable membership fee. This charge may be in addition to or in lieu of a connection
charge. Therefore, there is hereby added to the Contractor's schedule a nonrefundable, nonrecurring charge for (as
mutually negotiated for each modification applicable to connection charges) negotiated in the amount of $ (as
mutually negotiated for each modification applicable to connection charges). dollars payable.
(End of clause)
52.241-13 CAPITAL CREDITS (FEB 1995)
(a) The Government is a member of the (NOT APPLICABLE) and as any other member, is entitled to capital
credits consistent with the bylaws of the cooperative, which states the obligation of the Contractor to pay capital
credits and which specifies the method and time of payment.
(b) The Contractor shall furnish to the Contracting Officer, or the designated representative of the Contracting
Officer, in writing, on a (NOT APPLICABLE) basis a list of accrued credits by contract number, year, and delivery
point.
(c) Payment of capital credits will be made by check, payable to the (NOT APPLICABLE), and forwarded to the
Contracting Officer at (NOT APPLICABLE) unless otherwise directed in writing by the Contracting Officer.
Checks shall cite the current or last contract number and indicate whether the check is partial or final payment for
all capital credits accrued.
(End of clause)
52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)
This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in
full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may
be accessed electronically at this/these addressees):
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 23 of 24
http://www. amet. gov /tllr/fac frame. html
(end of clause)
252.241-7000 SUPERSEDING CONTRACT. (DEC 1991)
This contract supersedes contract No. N44255-96-C-2288, dated 01 December 1997, and N44255-08-C-3006,
awarded 30 November 2007, which provided similar services. Any capital credits accrued to the Government, any
remaining credits due to the Government under the connection charge, or any termination liability are transferred to
this contract, as follows:
Capital Credits: None Outstanding
Outstanding Connection Charge Credits: None Outstanding
Termination Liability Charges: None Outstanding.
(End of clause)
N44255-08-C-3005
Page 24 of 24
Section J - List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments
ATTACHMENTS
J.l Summary of Final Negotiations and Rate Analyses for the City ofBremerton and U.S.Navy Wholesale
Water and Sewer Rates, 11 March 2008
1.2 Methodology For Adjustment Water and Wastewater Rates, 21 June 2008 (Includes Narrative and
Spreadsheets)
1.3 Bremerton Municipal Code 15.06, Appendix A, Assessments, Rates, Fees, and Charges, Effective
January 1,2008.
J.4 Water and Wastewater Utility Locations, Accounts, and Metering For Bremerton Naval Complex,
14 March 2008
1.5 Key Utility Personnel Contact List, Bremerton Naval Complex and City of Bremerton, 04 April 2008
Methodology for Adjustment of Water and Wastewater Rates
N44255-08-C-3005
Attachment J.2
04 April 2008
A. RATIONALE:
(1) The paIiies have agreed to an approach for annually escalating or reducing rates that
tie to City of Bremerton rate changes. This method ensures an equitable treatment for all
customers of the City and provides transparency of costs to the Navy.
(2) The parties have agreed that any future rate changes applied to the Navy accounts for
contract line items 0001 (water) and 0002 (wastewater) shall be tied directly to the
weighted average of rate increases applied to all Non-Navy customers for water and/or
wastewater, respectively. For purposes of calculating rate increases to the Navy, the
Non-Navy baseline customer classes and billable units will remain fixed through the life
of the contract. Only the Non-Navy revenues generated for the Non-Navy customer
classes will vary from year to year based on the rate increases applied by the City through
revisions to the applicable City ordnances.
As an example, the Non-Navy revenue from ratesin Year 1 will be compared to the Non-
Navy revenue from rates in Year 2. The Navy rates will be increased by the overall
weighted percent increase to all Non-Navy customer classes from Year 1 to Year 2. The
next year, the Non-Navy revenue from rates in Year 2 will be compared to the Non-Navy
revenue from rates for Year 3. The Navy rates will be increased by the overall weighted
percent increase to all Non-Navy classes from Year 2 to 3. This methodology will
continue through the life of the contract. The number and types of customer classes
and the billable usage used each year for the classes will always remain unchanged
from Year 1.
This approach guarantees that the Navy's rates will adjust as the City's rates adjust as a
whole. The Navy notes that this approach will need to be modified if the City
significantly changes its rate structure during the contract term. Example of such a rate
structure changes would include adding an additional rate block or shifting to seasonal
rates. If this should occur, the City will be required to propose how the adjustment
should be handled during the rate transition year. The Navy and the City will then
negotiate a change to the adjustment formula for the next applicable year based on the
City's revised rate structure.
1
Methodology for Adjustment of Water and Wastewater Rates
N44255-08-C-3005
Attachment J.3
04 April 2008
B. METHODOLOGY.
(1) In order to verify the weighted average escalator between any given year and any
year + 1 of the contract, it is necessary to input the rates and charges approved by the
Bremerton City Council into the spreadsheet found in Attachment 1.2 The revised rates
and charges are multiplied by the baseline usage to calculate the revenue for any year + 1.
(2) The parties agree that the baseline usage provided at the begilming of the contract by
the City of Bremerton shall not change during the entire contract term. The baseline
usages for water and wastewater, respectively, are found in Attachment J under the water
and wastewater spreadsheets titled "Base Year Calculations ".
(3) The formula for the percentage change in rate and charges for any year + 1 is to
divide the revenue in year + 1 by the revenue from the previous year. The formula for
these calculations are found in the Attachment J.2 spreadsheet titled "Summary".
Attachment J.2 also contains template spreadsheets for Years 2 through 10 for water and
wastewater. These spreadsheets contain all formulas necessary to build calculations once
the City has provided the new rates. These spreadsheets for water and wastewater are
titled "Sample Calculations" for each respective year 2 through 10.
While escalations have been assumed, the same calculation principles would apply to
reductions. The spreadsheets have been developed to show the impact of different sets of
rate increases and the spreadsheet entitled "Example Rate Increases" shows the different
rate increase scenarios.
(4) The City will provide any revised rates and revenues for Navy review in accordance
with Attachment J.2 no less than 30 days prior to the effective date of any such
adjustments. It is anticipated that future rate adjustments will nonnally become effective
01 January.
2
City of Bremerton
Summary of the Final Negotiations and Rate Analyses
for the City of Bremerton and U.S. Navy Wholesale
Water and Sewer Rates
March 2008
Prepared by:
HDR Engineering, Inc.
500 108th Ave. N.E. Suite 1200
Bellevue, WA 98004
fD3.
March 11,2008
Mr. Phil Williams, P.E.
Director of Public Works & Utilities
City of Bremerton
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, Washington 98310
Subject: Summary ofthe Technical Analysis to Support the U.S. Navy Contract Negotiations
Dear Mr. Williams:
HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) was retained by the City ofBremerton in 2004 to conduct a
comprehensive water and sewer rate study. This study was the foundation for establishing cost-
based rates for the City's customers, which included the U.S. Navy (Navy). The City had a
contract with the City for wholesale water and sewer service (Navy Contract N44255-96-
C2288) which recently expired on December 1,2008. Given that, the City and Navy have been
working diligently to negotiate a new ten-year agreement for cost-based wholesale water and
sewer services. As you know, our negotiations recently were completed with the Navy and all
technical issues associated with calculating cost-based rates were mutually agreed upon and
resolved.
This report is intended to "bridge the gap" between the original 2004 study and the rates to be
charged to the Navy beginning on May 1,2008 under the new agreement. More importantly, the
City's successfully negotiation with the Navy has established a methodology that should be
mutually acceptable for the parties at the time ofthe next contract negotiation (2018). This
report will provide summary level documentation of the key issues that were negotiated and
modified within the City's 2004 comprehensive rate study to produce the final negotiated water
and sewer rates for the Navy.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this technical assistance.
Sincerely yours,
HDR Engineering, Inc.
~v~
Tom Gould
Vice President
National Technical Director of
Finance and Rates
HDR Engineering, Inc.
5!)[l1 C0ih AV/Jr"Je wE
$Ulle 1200
Bel1e'lli€, \VA 9ll\104-S!J49
Phi);W 1415) 450,6100
f3~, 11251453,7101
\Vy.;-~v_Jdrmt am~
~,' N~^ ::'" x ^ ~ :, <~ ~^ ^ ~~ ',':/~ <; ", ~ Y'>.:'
Contents, ~" "',' '. ',' ','" " , '
/y , , =:.. , ~ < .f. ~ y , i ~ ~ y
1 Development of the Navy's Water Rate
1.1 Introduction........ ....................... ............ ...... ........ ................................................ .... 1
1.2 Overview of the Key Technical Issues .................................................................... 1
1.3 Discussion of the Key Water Technical Issues .......................................................1
1.4 Summary of the Final Navy Water Cost of Service ................................................ 5
1.5 Development of the Proposed Water Rates............................................................. 6
1.6 Adjustments and Escalation of the Rates Through Time ........................................ 6
1.7 Summary ofthe Water Rate Analysis:....................................................................7
2 Development of the Navy's Sewer Rate
2.1 Introduction... ......................... ................. .... ............... ............................ ....... .......... 8
2.2 Overview of the Key Technical Issues.................................................................... 8
2.3 Discussion of the Key Sewer Technical Issues ....................................................... 8
2.4 Summary of the Final Navy Sewer Cost of Service.............................................. 11
2.5 Development ofthe Proposed Sewer Rates .......................................................... 11
2.6 Adjustments and Escalation of the Rates Through Time ......................................12
2.7 Summary of the Sewer Rate Analysis...................................................................12
Technical Appendices - Water and Sewer Rate Analyses
li)~
Contents
City of Bremerton - Wholesale Contract Negotiations with the U.S. Navy
. .
. .
. ...., ." ::.~ ,
:Section"1 .".' ..'
. . :.~ .. /" ., .::~ . ^ .:~. .
'iD~v@lop,~~nf'pft...e ..Navy's 'W~t~r'(Ra.~~s'<';'
, ..' .' ...../, . '..... .; .:". '>'.;:' ,. 'ff.' ,:F." .,
.:r ."
J'
.~.,
">
. ,~. ..(
,":, .x"."
1.1 Introduction
In 2004, Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. (EES)l was retained by the City of Bremerton
(City) to develop a comprehensive water and sewer rate study. That rate study report was
prepared to provide the basis for establishing cost-based rates for the City's retail and wholesale
customers. The City serves the U.S. Navy (Navy) with wholesale water service via a contract
(Navy Contract N44255-96-C2288). The 2004 rate study provided the basis for the City
and Navy to negotiate a fair and equitable methodology between the parties. The final
negotiated methodology and cost of service results would serve as the basis for a new 10-year
contract for water service between the parties.
1.2 Overview of the Key! Technical Issues
In the process of negotiating a new contract with the Navy, there were a number of water cost
allocation issues that were discussed and resolved between the parties. Specifically, these issues
were as follows:
. Navy contribution of payment in-lieu-oftaxes (PILOT)
. Intergovernmental payments
. UUD Payments
. Equitable Allocation of Distribution Mains
. Confirmation of past Navy capital contributions-in-aid of construction
. Establishment of a "fair" rate of return methodology
· Method to escalate 2004 final allocations to 2008 rate levels
Provided below is a summary discussion of each of these technical points and the modification
made to the 2004 rate model.
1.3 Discussion of the Key Water Technical Issues
The key technical issues identified above for the water utility were negotiated between the
parties and a mutually acceptable resolution was reached. The issue and final resolution of each
is discussed below.
NAVY CONTRIBUTION OF PAYMENT IN- LIEU-OF TAXES (PILOT) - The City pays 8.5% PILOT
on revenues received. In the 2004 rate analysis, the Navy's revenues were excluded from this
calculation. In the process of reviewing various technical issues in the negotiation process, the
1 Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. was acquired by HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) in the fall of2004.
L ~~ City of Bremerton
rl...J..... \. Development of the Navy's Water Rates
1
City discovered that the Navy's revenues had erroneously been excluded within the revenue
requirements (Water Exhibit 2, Page 6 of 7). The City provided documentation to the Navy to
satisfy the Navy that PILOT was paid on the revenues received from the Navy. Given that, the
total amount of PILOT was adjusted to reflect this modification. In the original analysis, the
value shown for 2004 was $433,897. With the inclusion of the Navy's revenues in the
calculation, the final modified amount is $519,272.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS - In the 2004 study, the intergovernmental payments were
budgeted figures, and were calculated for 2005 and beyond. The parties agreed that the
intergovernmental services would be calculated for 2004 using the approach used in the 2005 test
period. This reduced the payments in 2004 from $249,055 to $231,791.
AMORTIZATION OF ULID PAYMENTS - In the original cost of service study, two UUD
payments of $120,000 each were included in the 2004 revenue requirement analysis (Exhibit 2,
Page 6 of 7). The Navy correctly noted that these two payments were "one-time" payments, and
the City agreed with that observation. The Navy's position on these payments was that "one-
time" or non-recurring payments should be amortized over the life of the contract. After
discussing this issue, the City concurred with the Navy and agreed to amortize these payments
over a five-year period. It is important to note that this is an issue that is specific to this 2004 test
period and going forward this should not be an issue in future rate calculations. However, there
certainly may be other "one-time" or non-recurring payments that the Navy and City will need to
agree upon for their inclusion and handling in future rate studies.
The amortization of the UUD payment was not directly addressed in Water Exhibit 2. The City
wanted to maintain the "integrity" of Water Exhibit 2 and allocate the full UUD to all customers
on Water Exhibit 10, Page 4 of 4. In that process, the Navy is allocated a full (one-time) UUD
payment in Water Exhibit 112. The results of Exhibit 11 are carried forward to Exhibit 12. At
that point, a credit is provided to the Navy for the UUD payment. The footnote to that Exhibit
details the credit provided. The net effect is the UUD payment made by the Navy for the test
year is the equivalent of a five year amortization schedule. It should also be noted that the UUD
credit was provided before the additional tax calculation on Water Exhibit 12, so the City
believes they have fairly treated the Navy in this crediting process.
EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINS - Distribution mains assets are
classified on Water Exhibit 8, Page 1 of 2. In the 2004 study, distribution mains are split
between those 12" and larger and mains smaller than 12". In the original 2004 study, the City
allocated a portion of all distribution mains to the Navy. The Navy objected to this allocation
and noted that they are served through three (3) - 10" meters and should not be allocated any of
the smaller sized mains on the system. The City recognized and acknowledged this point, but
noted that the Navy did benefit from mains that were 8" and larger (i.e. reliability, etc). Given
this discussion between the parties, the City and Navy was able to reach a mutually acceptable
compromIse.
One of the challenges of attempting to segregate the distributions mains by size is the City's
2 The Navy's UUD payment, while not clearly seen in this exhibit, is the one-time amount, and not the agreed upon
amortized amount.
L ""'""'~ City of Bremerton
I"l...J... '- Development of the Navy's Water Rates
2
asset data does not easily support that calculation. The Navy recognized this data limitation and
accepted the City's proposed methodology to reasonably reflect the Navy's concerns for the
equitable allocation of these plant assets. The final resolution concerning the allocation of
distributions mains was to divide the mains into three categories. These categories were 2" - 6",
8" to 12" and greater than 12". As noted previously, the City did not have specific plant asset
records to split the 12" and small mains into the 2" - 6" and 8" to 12" categories. Given that, the
agreed upon method was to split the 12" and smaller mains (asset values) on the basis of the
linear feet of installed main. The 2004 study indicated the City has 1,407,269 feet of 2" - 12"
mains. Of this amount, 650,735 linear feet was related to the 2" to 6" mains. This is 46.2% of
the 2" - 12" mains. The 46.2% was then applied to the total asset value for the 2" - 12" mains to
determine the asset value for the 2" - 6" mains. The balance of the 2" - 12" was considered to
be a reasonable proxy for the 8" - 12" distribution mains. In the final allocation methodology,
none of the 2" - 6" mains were allocated to the Navy. However, the Navy was allocated a
proportional share of all mains 8" and larger.
At the time of the next cost of service study, it is presumed that the linear feet calculation will be
updated to reflect the general methodology used within this final model.
CONFIRMATION OF PAST NAVY CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS-IN-AID-OF CONSTRUCTION - In the
calculation of rate base (net plant investment), the traditional rate setting formula deducts any
contributions-in-aid-of construction from the net plant in service value. Within the City's study,
this item can be found on Exhibit 8, Page 2 of2. A major concern of the Navy was the amount
of contributions-in-aid-of construction credited to the Navy. A complicating factor in the
discussion was a prior contract with the Navy that had segregated O&M payments from capital
payments. The City explained that the past Navy capital payments were, for the most part,
simply the equivalent of a rate funded capital payment and not a contribution-in-aid-of
construction. Since that prior contract, the Navy's water rates now include both an O&M and
capital infrastructure component so this issue should not a problem in the future.
After much discussion, sharing of information and documentation, and a formal audit by the
Navy, the Navy concurred that the City's calculation of the contributions-in-aid, along with their
use within the calculation of rate base was appropriate. In short, the Navy concurred that the
handling of the contributions-in-aid-of the construction on Water Exhibit 8 were correct and
acceptable.
ESTABLISHMENT OF A "FAIR" RATE OF RETURN METHODOLOGY FOR THE NAVY - A rate of
return is used to earn a return on investment. There are multiple methods that may be used to
establish a "fair" rate of return. In the original 2004 rate study, the Navy was assessed a 9.0%
rate of return. The Navy objected to this level of rate of return as being excessive. An important
point of discussion that arose concerning this issue was the recognition that the Navy is a "non-
owner" of the City's system, and the City as the "owner" of the system is entitled to a "fair" rate
of return. The Navy acknowledged that position but believed that the City's "risk" associated
with serving the Navy was less than the City was advocating. Different approaches were
discussed as to how a fair rate of return could be established for contracting purposes and the
City proposed a method of using the cost of debt + a risk premium. The City proposed a risk
premium of 2.5%. Using the City's methodology, that would produce a water utility rate of
I-i)~
City of Bremerton
Development of the Navy's Water Rates
3
return of7.632%. The Navy agreed with the overall approach, but requested justification for the
level of risk premium and overall rate of return.
The City's response to the Navy regarding the question of reasonableness for this rate of return
was a recent rate case of the Anchorage Water and Wastewater Utility (AWWU). AWWU is a
municipal utility that serves the greater Anchorage area. A unique aspect of this municipal
utility is that it is regulated and its rates and rate of return are set by the Alaska Regulatory
Utility Commission (RUe). Anchorage recently went through a rate filing for their water utility
(filing U-06-45, Order 7 [7-16-07]). As a part of that filing, Anchorage needed to file for an
overall rate of return and return on equity. In the end, the RUC authorizes a return on equity for
AWWU of 10.1% and an overall rate of return of7.31%. The City noted to the Navy that this
independent regulatory body considered the issues of risk for a municipal utility and established
an overall rate of return that was nearly identical to the rate of return that the City proposed to
the Navy. Based in part on that justification, along with other discussions, the Navy accepted the
City's proposed methodology for establishing the water utility rate of return for the Navy.
As a part of the accepted methodology for rate of return a detailed formula or approach was
developed. The proposed formula for determining the Navy's "fair" rate of return was as
follows:
Cost of Debt + a Risk Premium of2.5% = Total Rate of Return
The risk premium of2.5% will be fixed for the duration of the contract term. The rate of return
will vary over time, but the only variable that will change is the cost of debt. In determining the
final rate of return for rate setting purposes, there are conditional tests (e.g. use the greater of,
etc.) to assure that the resulting rate of return from the formula does not create or lead to
unintended consequences (e.g. a rate of return less than the inside City customers, a rate of return
greater than other wholesale customers, etc.).
Specifically, the proposed definition for determining the rate of return for rate setting purposes is
as follows:
"The Rate of Return allowed under this contract shall be the City's cost of debt plus a
risk premium of 2. 5%. The rate of return will be reviewed in any cost of service study
prepared by the City for its utilities throughout the life of this contract. The rate of return
shall also meet the following tests:
1) It shall be the greater of
a. The City's cost of embedded debt plus 2.5%, or
b. The City's current cost of borrow ing plus 2.5%
2) It shall always be greater than or equal to the rate of return for in-City retail
customers (owner customers), but less than or equal to the rate of return for
outside city customers
3) It shall always be greater than or equal to zero
The City's "cost of borrowing" shall be the numerical (simple) average of at least
three recent debt issues (within the previous 90 days if possible) in the marketplace
L ~~ City of Bremerton
r-1.J... '- Development of the Navy's Water Rates
4
for municipal entities with similar terms and credit ratings. The City's "cost of
embedded debt" shall be the weighted average of all non-subsidized outstanding debt
for the combined utilities. These indexes shall be submitted to the Navy for review
and comment prior to use in a future COSA prepared by the City. "
As noted previously, using this specific methodology the proposed overall rate of return for the
water utility was 7.632%. Attached as part of the water cost of service exhibits is the calculation
of the proposed rate of return for the water study. This proposed rate of return is 1.368% less
than the City's original proposed rate of return of9.0%.
METHOD TO ESCALATE THE 2004 COSTS TO 2008 COST LEVELS - The water cost of service
study conducted in 2004 allocated 2004 dollars (costs) to the Navy. The City adjusted their
overall water rates by 30% in 2004. In 2006, the City again adjusted the water rates by an
overall 15%, and then 4.2% in 2007 and on January 1,2008 there was a 3.5% adjustment. The
City and Navy discussed the most appropriate method to escalate the Navy's allocated 2004
costs to 2008 rate levels. A complicating factor was the Navy's allocation of 2004 costs were at
cost of service levels, yet the retail customers on the City's system had their rates "phased-in" to
mitigate the rate impacts. After comparing methodologies, the City and Navy agreed upon a
final methodology. An important element in the selection by the parties of the final escalation
methodology is that the City's escalated revenues and Navy's escalated revenues, when added
together, tied to the overall revenue requirements of the City for each particular year. At the
same time, the methodology maintained the same relationship between the Navy revenues and
other non-Navy (retail) revenues through the escalation periods.
Given a methodology to escalate the costs, it was determined that the Navy's 2004 costs would
be escalated by 6.5% for the 2006 adjustment, then by 4.2% for the 2007 adjustment and finally
by 3.5% for the 2008 adjustment. The effect of this series of escalations is to take the Navy's
2004 allocated costs and bring them up to 2008 levels for purposes of designing final water rates.
An exhibit has been included within the water technical appendices documenting the escalation
of the Navy's 2004 water costs to 2008 rate levels.
1.4 Summary of the Final Navy Water Cost of Service
Based upon the specific issues noted above, the original 2004 water cost of service analysis was
updated for final mutually agreed upon methodology to allocate water costs to the Navy.
Provided below in Table 1 is a summary of the allocation and cost escalation process.
~ , '>" ~ < , ~ ^ y..\ ~ ,
." , ' , Table 1 ' , " '"
, , "j "
, ',~ Summ~ry of the Final !Navy Water C'ost of Service Analysis :
^' y/ / / y ~ y
Y>,'/'<<
~""../'
, w.., ,', ~~~ '
,~~yj~ed ... . '
':A:no.cation
$1,353,960
Plus 2006; 2667 & ~008'
Rate AdjjjstJQelits>
. . .~
. ,
15.17%
, .~..?>
/. '. 260'8,; .'
,'. '.:. Rate Levels
$1,559,335
. .i>es~.riptlon
Water Cost of Service
Given a targeted level of revenue, the final step of the process is to design rates to collect the
targeted amount.
L ~~ City of Bremerton
IV... '- Development of the Navy's Water Rates
5
1.5 Development of the Proposed Water Rates
The water rate calculated for the Navy uses the same rate structure as the existing water rate.
The City and Navy discussed shifting more of the rate to the variable component, but the City
concluded that the Navy's proposal of 25% fixed and 75% variable was very similar to the
existing 30%/70% relationship in the existing rates. For that reason, the proposed water rates
were designed around 30% fixed and 70% variable?
Provided below in Table 2 is a summary of the proposed 2008 water rate for the Navy.
'~~ ~ < <~, y f.: / y ^ ~
~ ~ " ^ ",j" ~ ; Table 2 J ^ '" ",,",
<" ~ ~~ ~ ~ < /~
. ~ Proposed Navy WaterARate - To'Be Effec;,tive Niay 1, 20~8' , ' "
~ <:: ^ yY
", ,>;
", ,,-'':
Utility,:'" .'
Water Utility
Fixed Charges
Variable Charges
Total
,;"~ '
'Taige~':,
'Reyeol!e Ilr'
, 'l','! ";-,, '}
\,
...:'BtlJing;;i
pnits ;l2] ,
PrO,pose,if 2tJO~J::
"'B,1lie I:eV;tls[3]
. ..
$468,000
1.091335
$1,559,335
873,280
$39,000/month
$1.25/CCF
[1] Note: There is some rounding of the relationship between fIXed and variable to produce whole dollar fixed
charges
[2] Source: Water Exhibit 3
[3 ] Water rates beyond 2008 are subject to the escalation clause or method of adjustment of the new contract.
The City and Navy have targeted an effective date of May 1, 2008 for the new water rate and
contract. This effective date is subject to acceptance of the final contract document by both
parties.
1.6 Adjustments and Escalation of the Rates Through Time
In developing a new water services contract, the City and Navy have agreed upon a term of ten
(10) years. As a part of the negotiation process, the City and Navy discussed various methods to
escalate the Navy's water rates through time. In a letter from Paul Anishanslin dated June 29,
2007, the Navy proposed a method for escalating costs. In very simplified terms, in that
methodology the Navy's rates would be adjusted by the overall percentage adjustment applied to
the City's other retail customers. The methodology calculates a percentage adjustment that is
based upon a "baseline" of retail customers and consumption over the ten-year period and only
the retail rates would be a variable in calculating the change. The City agreed that this
methodology was acceptable for escalation of rates through time, in the absence of a
comprehensive rate study which specifically allocates costs to the Navy using the final agreed
upon allocation methodology. This report has assumed that the contract between the City and
Navy will have a detailed example of this escalation methodology.
3 The 30%/70% refers to the design of the rate and is not intended to reflect the exact proportion of fixed and
variable revenues that will actually be collected from the Navy over the life of the contract. The actual ratio of fixed
to variable revenues is a function of the Navy's volumetric use, which can vary from year to year.
L ~~ City of Bremerton
r-1.J... '- Development of the Navy's Water Rates
6
1.7 Summary of the Water Rate Analysis
This section of the report has discussed the key changes to the water cost of service methodology
to equitably allocate costs to the Navy. From that methodology, the 2004 rate study was updated
to reflect the mutually agreed upon approach. The result produced cost-based levels for the
Navy that were escalated to 2008 cost levels. Finally, water rates for 2008 were designed.
The above discussion is not intended to be comprehensive in nature concerning the overall water
cost of service methodology, or more importantly, all of the discussions held between the parties.
Rather, it is intended to simply summarize and document those key discussions that resulted in
the development of the final methodology.
li)~
City of Bremerton
Development of the Navy's Water Rates
7
.. ...
Section2^:i'< '." '.' .. .. '
.,.. . ~:~~. .Y". .: .A. .^
Devel~~I'Iie~t,:Q.f ,th~':.N~~Y'~/'Sewer ~,flates:<",
.:j..... :-../ .'. <. ... :,S: ~,. ..... ..:.... .:.-. ..\ .:~'N . ':> .^,/., ~~.:.:~:~.' ..
. :.,->:-:,.:
--<,: .~
...:....
..<..",.. ,
2.1 Introduction
The 2004 comprehensive rate study conducted by Economic and Engineering Services, Inc.
(EES)4 developed a comprehensive sewer rate study for the City of Bremerton. The 2004 report
was intended to be the basis for establishing cost-based sewer rates for the Navy. The 2004 was
used as the basis for the parties to establish a final agreed upon methodology to establish cost-
based sewer rates for the Navy. The negotiation of the sewer cost of service methodology serves
as the basis for a new 10-year contract for sewer service between the parties.
2.2 Overview of the Key Technical Issues
In the process of negotiating a new contract with the Navy, there were a number of sewer cost
allocation issues that were discussed and resolved between the parties. Specifically, these issues
were as follows:
. Navy contribution of payment in-lieu-oftaxes (PILOT)
. Intergovernmental Payments
. Equitable Allocation ofthe Collection Plant
. Equitable Allocation of Sewer Laterals
. Confirmation of past Navy capital contributions-in-aid of construction
. Establishment of a "fair" rate of return methodology
. Method to escalate 2004 final allocations to 2008 rate levels
Provided below is a summary discussion of each of these technical points and the modification
made to the 2004 sewer rate model. Many of these items are similar to the discussion provided
for water, and when applicable, will be referenced as such.
2.3 Discussion of the Key Sewer Technical Issues
The key technical issues identified above for the sewer utility were negotiated between the
parties and mutually acceptable resolution was reached. The issue and final resolution of each is
discussed below.
NAVY CONTRIBUTION OF PAYMENT IN-LIEU-OF TAXES (PILOT) - Similar to the water utility,
the City pays 8.5% PILOT on the sewer revenues received (Sewer Exhibit 2, Page 5 of7). In the
2004 rate analysis, the Navy's sewer revenues were excluded from this calculation. With the
clarification and resolution of this issue for the water utility the Navy agreed that it would also
apply to the sewer utility. Given that, the total amount of PILOT for the sewer utility was
4 Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. was acquired by HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) in the fall of 2004.
L '"""""\~ City of Bremerton
~.... '- Development of the Navy's Sewer Rates
8
adjusted to reflect this modification. In the original analysis, the value shown for 2004 was
$618,882. With the inclusion of the Navy's revenues in the calculation, the final modified
amount is $771,553.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS - In the 2004 study, the intergovernmental payments were
budgeted figures, but were calculated for 2005 and beyond. The parties agreed that the
intergovernmental services would be calculated for 2004 using the approach used in the 2005 test
period. This reduced the payments in 2004 from $266,065 to $239,246.
EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF THE SEWER COLLECTION PLANT - Collection plant assets are
classified and allocated on Sewer Exhibit 7, Page 1 of 2. The Navy has a committed capacity of
19.5% of the City's wastewater treatment facilities. Given that, in the 2004 study the City
directly assigned to the Navy 19.5% of the City's collection system. The Navy believed that this
allocation over-stated the Navy's use of these facilities. The Navy proposed that the collection
system assets be allocated to the Navy on the basis of their volumetric contribution. The City
recognized and acknowledged the Navy's argument and agreed to this method of classification
and allocation for the sewer collection plant. In the revised me,thodology, sewer collection plant
in service is proportionally allocated to the Navy on the basis of their volumetric wastewater
contributions (i.e. flows).
EQUITABLE ALLOCA nON OF SEWER LATERALS - Sewer laterals are included in the same group
of accounts as the sewer collection plant (Sewer Exhibit 7, Page 1 of 2). The Navy stated that
they did not benefit from these laterals and should not be allocated any of these facilities. The
City agreed with the Navy's position and the revised allocation method does not allocate any
sewer laterals to the Navy (PSNS).
CONFIRMATION OF PAST NAVY CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS-IN-Am-OF CONSTRUCTION - In the
calculation of rate base (net plant investment), the traditional rate setting formula deducts any
contributions-in-aid-of construction from the net plant in service value. Within the City's study,
this item can be found on Exhibit 7, Page 2 of2. Similar to the water utility, a major concern of
the Navy was the amount of contributions-in-aid-of construction credited to the Navy. For the
sewer utility, the determination of contributions-in-aid-of construction is slightly more
complicated since the Navy has made actual ("true") contributions-in-aid for this utility.
However, in the end, similar to the findings associated with the water utility, the Navy concurred
with the City's calculations and application of this data in the calculation of sewer rate base.
ESTABLISHMENT OF A "FAIR" RATE OF'RETURN METHODOLOGY FOR THE NAVY - The rate of
return discussion and methodology for the sewer utility tracks with the discussion provided for
the water utility. The original 2004 rate study assumed a 9.0% rate of return for the Navy. With
the agreed upon methodology for establi~hing a rate of return for the sewer utility, the final rate
of return for the cost of service was 7.805%. The sewer utility has a slightly higher cost of debt
compared to the water utility.
The proposed formula for determining the Navy's "fair" rate of return for sewer is identical to
the water utility. For clarification purposes it is as follows:
Jill.
City of Bremerton
Development of the Navy's Sewer Rates
9
Cost of Debt + a Risk Premium of2.5% = Total Rate of Return
The risk premium of2.5% will be fixed for the duration of the contract term. The rate of return
will vary over time, but the only variable that will change is the cost of debt. In determining the
final rate of return for rate setting purposes, there are conditional tests (e.g. use the greater of,
etc.) to assure that the resulting rate of return from the formula does not create or lead to
unintended consequences (e.g. rate of return less than the inside City customers, greater than
wholesale, etc.).
Specifically, the proposed definition for determining the rate of return for rate setting purposes is
as follows:
"The Rate of Return allowed under this contract shall be the City's cost of debt plus a
risk premium of 2. 5%. The rate of return will be reviewed in any cost of service study
prepared by the City for its utilities throughout the life of this contract. The rate of return
shall also meet the following tests:
4) It shall be the greater of
a. The City's cost of embedded debt plus 2.5%, or
b. The City's current cost of borrowing plus 2.5%
5) It shall always be greater than or equal to the rate of return for in-City retail
customers (owner customers), but less than or equal to the rate of return for
outside city customers
6) It shall always be greater than or equal to zero
The City's "cost of borrowing" shall be the numerical (simple) average of at least
three recent debt issues (within the previous 90 days if possible) in the marketplace
for municipal entities with similar terms and credit ratings. The City's "cost of
embedded debt" shall be the weighted average of all non-subsidized outstanding debt
for the combined utilities. These indexes shall be submitted to the Navy for review
and comment prior to use in afuture COSA prepared by the City. "
As noted previously, using this specific methodology the proposed overall rate of return for the
water utility was 7.805%. Attached as part of the sewer cost of service exhibits is the calculation
of the proposed rate of return for the sewer study. This proposed rate of return is 1.195% less
than the City's original proposed rate of return.
METHOD TO ESCALATE THE 2004 COSTS TO 2008 COST LEVELS - The sewer rate study
conducted in 2004 allocated 2004 dollars (costs) to the Navy. The City adjusted their overall
sewer rates by 10% in 2004, 14% in 2006, 4.2% in 2007 and on January 1, 2008 there was a
3.5% adjustment. Similar to the water utility, a methodology was developed to escalate the 2004
costs to 2008 levels. An important element in the selection of the final escalation methodology
is that the City's escalated revenues plus the Navy's escalated revenues, when summed, tied to
the overall revenue requirements ofthe City for each particular year.
Given a methodology to escalate the costs, it was determined that the Navy's 2004 costs would
be escalated by 8.0% for the 2006 adjustment, then by 4.2% for the 2007 adjustment and finally
L ~"'":> City of Bremerton
J:l...J... '\ Development of the Navy's Sewer Rates
10
by 3.5% for the 2008 adjustment. The effect of this series of escalations is to take the Navy's
2004 allocated costs and bring them up to 2008 levels for purposes of designing final sewer
rates. An exhibit has been included within the sewer technical appendices documenting the
escalation of the Navy's 2004 sewer costs to 2008 rate levels.
2.4 Summary of the Final Navy Sewer Cost of Service
Based upon the specific issues noted above, the original 2004 sewer cost of service (C-O-S)
analysis was updated for the final mutually agreed upon methodology to equitably allocate sewer
costs to the Navy. Provided below in Table 3 is a summary of the allocation and cost escalation
process.
;.. < ~ y
, " ^ ' "'" ^ ^/ ." Table 3 ' ". ' ^ . '" " .
y '>:.:~ ...,. y,^ ^ ~ j <} ~, ~ ^
. ; Summary of the finatNavy'Sewer Cost'of Service Analysis ^ '
< ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ .A~ y^ )
I)escripti~~
Rmsed, '
, . AUOC,ati9D
$1,673,160
~c",~,<<,,, ,,;>~i~,'" ,<'
, 'J>lus,2006,2007 &,2008
, ~t~Adjusi~~Dts~"
16.81%
," 206s'',~
~teI:eveIs
$1,954,414
Sewer Cost of Service
Given a targeted level of revenue, the final step of the process is to design rates to collect the
targeted amount.
2.5 Development of the Proposed Sewer Rates
The sewer rate calculated for the Navy has revised the relationship between fixed and variable
costs. The City's existing sewer rate uses a relationship of 70% fixed and 30% variable. The
Navy had proposed the reverse of this relationship. Given the debt load for the City's sewer
utility the City wanted to maintain a strong fixed charge, but at the same time, understood the
Navy's concerns with the existing fixed-variable relationship. The City aild Navy agreed that
the final methodology should use a relationship of50% fixed and 50% variable.s
Provided below in Table 4 is a summary of the proposed 2008 sewer rate for the Navy.
i.< ^"<" ,....,.: ^ ..... -::: < ~ .., ^ ^,
~ ,q '" ^ 'w'; Table 4 '. ' , 'c ^ ^ ','
:' ",' Proposed Navy Sewer Rate - -':0 Be Effective'May 1, "2008 . w
^ ^ ;;. -< y < <:v. ~
'~l;i:r,'
~ /,,":,
"'" ,II, "ti, ,'Ii' ty" ,','"
, , ':);l:>;:
"~l'arget':"",,, ';l;":
~V;~l!ue [1]
;:?:Billing q
:"/IJDits [21
'i, "," - ,-_ "L'>+ "',,"
.,::Propo~~il200S, , '
',' ,,"RaJe LevelsJ31
Water Utility
Fixed Charges
Variable Charges
Total
$976,800
977.614
$1,954,414
317,304
$81,400/month
$3.08/CCF
5 The 500/0150% refers to the design of the rate and is not intended to reflect the exact proportion of fixed and
variable revenues that will actually be collected from the Navy over the life of the contract. The actual ratio of fixed
to variable revenues is a function ofthe Navy's volumetric wastewater flows, which can vary from year to year.
L ~":) City of Bremerton
I"U... '- Development of the Navy's Sewer Rates
11
[IJ Note: There is some rounding of the relationship betweenfrxed and variable to produce whole dollar fixed
charges
[2 J Source: Sewer Exhibit 3
[3 J Sewer rate beyond 2008 is subject to the escalation clause or method of adjustment of the new contract.
The City and Navy have targeted an effective date of May 1, 2008 for the new sewer rate and
contract. This effective date is subject to acceptance of the final contract document by both
parties.
2.6 Adjustments and Escalation of the Rates Through Time
In developing a new sewer services contract, the City and Navy have agreed upon a term of ten
(10) years. As a part of the negotiation process, the City and Navy discussed various methods to
escalate the Navy's water rates through time. The method to be used for sewer escalation is
identical to the mutually acceptable method discussed for the water utility. This report has
assumed that the contract between the City and Navy will have a detailed example of the
escalation methodology to be applied to the Navy's sewer rates.
2.7 Summary of the Sewer Rate Analysis
This section ofthe report has discussed the key changes to the sewer cost of service methodology
to equitably allocate costs to the Navy. From that methodology, the 2004 rate study was updated
to reflect the mutually agreed upon approach. The result produced costs for Navy sewer services
that were escalated to 2008 cost levels. Finally, sewer rates for 2008 were designed.
The above discussion is not intended to be comprehensive in nature concerning the overall sewer
cost of service methodology, or more importantly, all ofthe discussions held between the parties.
Rather, it is intended to simply summarize and document those key discussions that resulted in
the development ofthe final methodology.
@3.
City of Bremerton
Development of the Navy's Sewer Rates
12
~, ~ :~ y ; y~ ~' ~ ~Y^, Y ~^y < ~t (~ d> ~'
.Wat~r Tec;hnical Appendic.es < <0\ <",~ M; ~ ;; ''"' ,
< y X: Jf. );: , N. ~..... i; >^ , "i '.:..: ^.... ~ .... ^ ':~....: ^~..-:<-< ~/ / ;:: <
~ y -< ~ 'J:\ .... ^ <(. ~ / .... .; i '
CITY OF BREMERTON
WATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 1
ESCALATION FACTORS
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Escalation Factors
Revenues:
Other Revenues 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Expenses:
Power 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
Labor (68% @ 3%, 12%@3%, 20%@26%-medical) 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.60%
Materials & Supplies 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Equipment 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Miscellaneous 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Depreciation 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
New Debt Service:
Long Term Debt
Term in Years 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Rate 5.5% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0%
Short Term Debt (PWfF Loan)
Term in Years 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Rate 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
Interest Rates
Interest Income 2.0% 2.0% 3.0% 3.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Growth 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
1 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 1 of7
WATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2006 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Basis of Classilicatlon
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Rate Revenues
401.34.343.4001 Water Sales Retail $3,604,669 $3,640,716 $3,677,123 $3,713,894 $3,751,033 $3,788,543 $3,826,429 $3,864,693 Rev Rpt @ 1 % growth
401.34.343.4002 PSNS Sales 1,004,416 1,027,848 1,038,126 1,048,507 1,058,993 1,069,582 1,080,278 1,091,081 As Other Revenue
Total Rate Revenues $4,609,085 $4,668,563 $4,715,249 $4,762,402 $4,810,026 $4,858,126 $4,906,707 $4,955,774
Other Revenues
Discretionary Revenue $123,420 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 One lime 2004
401.3".341.4300 Billing Services 51,500 1,515 1,530 1,545 1,561 1,577 1,592 1,608 As Other Revenue
401.34.341.5000 General Gov!. (sale of mapslmarlne bill) 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Other Revenue
401.34.342.4007 Misc Inspections 5.000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255 5,308 5,361 As Other Revenue
401.34.343.4002 Other Service Charges 150,000 151,500 153,015 154,545 156,091 157,652 159,228 160,820 As Other Revenue
401.34.343.4006 Water Connection lather Charges 150,000 151,500 153,015 154,545 156,091 157,652 159,228 160,820 As Growth
401.34.30115.8300 Plan Checking Fees 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Other Revenue
401.34362.5001 Park Facilities Rentals 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Flat
401.34.366.1000 Interfund Interest 1tl,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 One time 2004
401.34.361.1100 Investment Interest 50,000 50,500 51,005 51,515 52,030 52,551 53,076 53,607 As Other Revenue
401.34.362.5002 L.T. Facilities Lease 1,17.61'3 149,092 150,583 152,089 153,610 155,146 156,697 158,264 As Other Revenue
401.34.362.6001 Housing Rentals - Utility 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Flat
401.34366.2000 Interfund Rents 44,2GO 44,250 44,250 44,250 44,250 44,250 44,250 44,250 Flat
401.34.369.4000 Judgements and Settlements 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Flat
401.34369.11000 Other Misc. Revenue 4.000 4,040 4,080 4,121 4,162 4,204 4,246 4,289 As Other Revenue
Total Other Revenues $773,536 $638,967 $644,119 $649,323 $654,579 $659,887 $665,248 $670,663
Total Revenues $5,382,621 $5,307,531 $5,359,368 $5,411,725 $5,464,604 $5,518,013 $5,571,955 $5,626,438
APPLICATIONS OF FUNDS
401.34534.1034 Water Administration
X.X.X.X.51001 Labor/Benefits $149,062 $160,391 $172,580 $185,697 $199,809 $214,995 $231,335 $248,916 As Labor
X.X.x.X.50750 Reallocated Equipment Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As EqUipment
X.X,X.X.S3110 Office & Operating Supplies 17.000 17,170 17,342 17,515 17,690 17,867 18,046 18,226 As MaVSupplies
X.X.X.X.S3119 Office Supplies - Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As MaVSupplies
X.X.X.X.5J510 Small Tools & Equipment 5,000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255 5,308 5,361 As Equipment
X.>\.X.X.53530 Computer Reiated Items 5,000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255 5,308 5,361 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 2.1,345 21,558 21,774 21,992 22,212 22,434 22,658 22,885 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.54110 Prof. Services 10.000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Misc.
X,X.X.X.54119 Professional Services - Interfund 365,028 368,678 372,365 376,089 379,850 383,648 387,485 391,359 As MiSC.-General Fund
X.X.X.X.54210 Telecommunications 35.000 35,350 35,704 36,061 36,421 36,785 37,153 37,525 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54220 Postage 4,500 4,545 4,590 4,636 4,683 4,730 4,777 4,825 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54300 Travel 1,500 1,515 1,530 1,545 1,561 1,577 1,592 1,608 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54400 Advertising 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Misc.
X.x.XX.54520 Equipment Rental 1.260 1,273 1,285 1,298 1,311 1,324 1,338 1,351 As Equipment
X.X.x.X.5-4618 Insurance Premiums -Interfund 150,611 152,117 153,638 155,175 156,726 158,294 159,877 161,475 As Misc. - Risk Management
X.X.X.X.54810 Equipment Repair 2,604 2,630 2,656 2,683 2,710 2,737 2,764 2,792 As Misc.
XX.X.X.5-49tO Miscellaneous 14,000 14,140 14,281 14,424 14,568 14,714 14,861 15,010 As Misc.
Total Administration $782,410 $800,072 $818,659 $838,236 $858,874 $880,650 $903,646 $927,951
2 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 2 of 7
WATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Basis of Classification
.534.7034 Customer Service
X.x.XX.51001 Reallocated Labor Costs $240.'380 $258,972 $278,654 $299,831 $322,618 $347,137 $373,520 $401,907 As Labor
X.X.X.X.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 10.000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.X.X.5353510 Small Tools and Equipment 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.53530 Computer Related Items 1,500 1,515 1,530 1,545 1,561 1,577 1,592 1,608 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 4.753 4,801 4,849 4,897 4,946 4,995 5,045 5,096 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.54110 Professional Services (PSE billing) 22,000 22,220 22,442 22,667 22,893 23,122 23,353 23,587 As Mise,
X,X.X.X.54119 Professional Services Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
x x X.X.5421 0 Telecommunication 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.XXX.54220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mise,
X.XXX.54300 Travel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.S4520 Equipment Rental 82(; 833 842 850 858 867 876 885 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.54810 Equipment Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.x.X.X54910 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
Total Cust. Service & Marketing $280,258 $298,945 $319,027 $340,608 $363,803 $388,734 $415,533 $444,340
Total Water Administration $1,062,668 $1,099,018 $1,137,686 $1,178,844 $1,222,677 $1,269,384 $1,319,179 $1,372,291
Engineering
.53480:37 Operations
X.X.X.X.51001 Reallocated Labor Costs $215,482 $231,859 $249,480 $268,440 $288,842 $310,794 $334,414 $359,830 As Labor
X.XXX.53120 Office & Operating Supplies 2,ODO 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Mat/Supplies
X,X.X.X.5351O Small Tools & Equipment 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Equipment
X.X,X,X.5J530 Computer Related Items 9,000 9,090 9,181 9,273 9,365 9,459 9,554 9,649 As Equipment
xxx X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 14.665 14,812 14,960 15,109 15,260 15,413 15,567 15,723 As Equipment
XXX,X.S4110 Prof. Services - External 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54210 Telecommunications 600 606 612 618 624 631 637 643 As Misc.
X,X,XXS4300 Travel 850 859 867 876 885 893 902 911 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54220 Postage 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 As Misc.
X.X.X.xS4119 Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X X,X 5452G Rents - Equipment 1.800 1,818 1,836 1,855 1,873 1,892 1,911 1,930 As Equipment
X.XXX.5810 Equipment Repair 1,000 1,076 1,158 1,246 1,340 1,442 1,552 1,670 As Labor
X.X.X.X.54910 Miscellaneous 1.000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Misc.
Total Engineering Operations $247,497 $264,260 $282,276 $301,641 $322,457 $344,833 $368,889 $394,752
3 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 3 01 7
WATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Basis 01 Classification
401.31 Water Resource Manager
XX.534.5031 Maintenance
xxx X.50700 Reallocated Labor Cost $204,533 $220,078 $236,803 $254,800 $274,165 $295,002 $317,422 $341,546 As Labor
XXXX.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 35,000 35,350 35,704 36,061 36,421 36,785 37,153 37,525 As MaUSupplies
X.X.XXS3121 Utility Inventory 1,500 1,515 1,530 1,545 1,561 1,577 1,592 1,608 As MaUSupplies
X.XXX-S3ll9 Operating Supp, -Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Supplies
X.X,XXS3219 Fuel Consumed - IFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc,
XXXX.53510 Small Tools & Equipment 7,000 7,070 7,141 7,212 7,284 7,357 7,431 7,505 As Equipment
XXXX.5353Q Computer Related Items 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Equipment
x x xx 53520 Small Equipment & Furniture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
XX.XX,S4000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
XXX,X.S4ll0 Prolessional Services - External 25,000 25,250 25,503 25,758 26,015 26,275 26,538 26,803 As Misc.
X.X.x.X.54220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.XXS4520 Equipment 5,000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255 5,308 5,361 As Equipment
XXX.X.54740 Garbage 0 0 0 0 0 O' 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.x.X.54B10 Equipment Repair 10,000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Equipment
X.XXX 54319 Equipment Repair - Interfund () 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
XXX.x.54820 Other Improvements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.XXX.54830 Structures & Grounds Repair 300000 303,000 306,030 309,090 312,181 315,303 318,456 321,641 As Misc. lor Reservoirs
XXX.x.54910 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
Total Maintenance $589,033 $608,423 $629,032 $650,951 $674,278 $699,115 $725,576 $753,782
XX.534.7031 Customer Service
xxx.x.soroo Reallocated Labor Costs $17.1~9 $18,431 $19,832 $21,339 $22,960 $24,705 $26,583 $28,603 As Labor
x x X.X.5312Q Office & Operating Supplies 4,000 4,040 4,080 4,121 4,162 4,204 4,246 4,289 As Mat/Supplies
X,X.X.X.53121 Utility Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Supplies
XXXX53510 Small Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.XXX.5400Q Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X,X.X.S4ll0 Prol. Services External 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.XX.54220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Supplies
X.XXX.54300 Travel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
XXX,X.54400 Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
XXX.X.54520 Rents - Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X,X.X.X.5491Q Miscellaneous 4.000 4,040 4,080 4,121 4,162 4,204 4,246 4,289 As Misc.
Total Cust. Service $25,129 $26,511 $27,992 $29,581 $31,285 $33,114 $35,075 $37,180
4 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 4 of 7
WATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Basis of Classification
XX.534.8031 Operations
X.X.X.X.51001 Reallocated Labor Costs $485.448 $522,342 $562,040 $604,755 $650,716 $700,171 $753,384 $810,641 As Labor
X.X.X.X.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 70.000 70,700 71,407 72,121 72,842 73,571 74,306 75,049 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.X.X.53121 Utility Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Supplies
X.X,X,X.53210 Vehicle Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.53510 Small Tools & Equipment 50.000 50,500 51,005 51,515 52,030 52,551 53,076 53,607 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.53530 Computer Related Items ~,OOO 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.5400Q Reallocated Vehicle Costs 51.847 52,365 52,889 53,418 53,952 54,492 55,037 55,587 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.54110 Professional Services - External 155 000 75,000 75,750 76,508 77,273 78,045 78,826 79,614 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54210 Telephone 8,000 8,080 8,161 8,242 8,325 8,408 8,492 8,577 As Misc.
X,X.x.X.54220 Postage 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.X.X.54300 Travel 2,~;OO 2,525 2,550 2,576 2,602 2,628 2,654 2,680 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54400 Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54520 Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X.X,X 54710 Natural Gas 2,000 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Misc.
x X.X.X.54720 Electricity 2T5,OOO 283,250 291,748 300,500 309,515 318,800 328,364 338,215 As Power
X.X.X,X.54730 WaterlSewerlStormwater 400 404 408 412 416 420 425 429 As Misc.
xxx X.54810 Equipment Repair 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Equipment
X.X X.X.54820 Repairs - Other Improvements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X,X,X.X.54910 Miscellaneous 20.000 20,200 20,402 20,606 20,812 21,020 21,230 21,443 As Misc.
Total Operations $1,123,695 $1,090,922 $1,141,970 $1,196,320 $1,254,207 $1,315,886 $1,381,632 $1,451,739
Total Water Resources $1,737,857 $1,725,855 $1,798,995 $1,876,852 $1,959,769 $2,048,115 $2,142,284 $2,242,702
Wastewater Manager
534.9032 Other Operations - Bioso/ids
XXXX,S1001 Reallocated Labor Costs $69.208 $74,468 $80,127 $86,217 $92,770 $99,820 $107,406 $115,569 As Labor
X.X.X.X53110 Office & Operating Supplies 58,000 58,580 59,166 59,757 60,355 60,959 61,568 62,184 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.X.X53121 Utility Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.X.X.53510 Small Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
XX.XX.54110 Prof. Services - External 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54720 Electricity 9.500 9,785 10,079 10,381 10,692 11,013 11,343 11,684 As Power
X.XXX.5810 Equipment Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.XXX.54910 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
Total Wastewater Manager $136,708 $142,833 $149,372 $156,355 $163,817 $171,792 $180,318 $189,437
5 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 5 of7
WATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Basis of Classification
401.33. Utility Operations
X.X.534.5033 Maintenance
X.X.X.X.510Q1 Reallocated labor Cost $1.017.970 $1,095,336 $1,178,581 $1,268,153 $1,364,533 $1,468,238 $1,579,824 $1,699,890 As labor
x x.x.x 53110 Office & Operating Supplies 100.000 101,000 102,010 103,030 1 04,060 105,101 106,152 107,214 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.X.X 53119 Office Supplies - Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Supplies
x.X,X.X.53121 Utility Inventory 10,000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.x.X.S3420 Purchases for Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Supplies
XXX.X.53510 Small Tools & Equipment 10,000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Equipment
XX.X.X.5353Q Computer Related Items 5.000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255 5,308 5,361 As Equipment
X,X.X,X.540QO Reallocated Vehicle Costs 171,132 172,843 174,572 176,317 178,081 179,861 181,660 183,477 As Equipment
X.X,X.X.54110 Professional Services - External 3.000 3,030 3,060 3,091 3,122 3,153 3,185 3,216 As Misc.
X,X.X.X.S4210 Telecommunications 1.500 1,515 1,530 1,545 1,561 1,577 1,592 1,608 As Misc.
x x x X.54220 Postage 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Mat/Supplies
x.X.X.X.54300 Travel 2,000 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.S4400 Advertising 2.000 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Misc.
X.x.X.x.S4520 Rents - Equipment 4,500 4,545 4,590 4,636 4,683 4,730 4,777 4,825 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54710 Naturai Gas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Misc.
X.XXX.54720 Electricity - Olympus Drive Only 20.000 20,600 21,218 21,855 22,510 23,185 23,881 24,597 As Power
X.X.X.X.54740 Garbage 2,000 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Misc.
x x X.X.5481O Equipment Repair 8,000 8,080 8,161 8,242 8,325 8,408 8,492 8,577 As Equipment
x X,X x 54830 Structures & Grounds 5.000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255 5,308 5,361 As Misc.
x X.x.X.54910 Miscelianeous 35.000 35,350 35,704 36,061 36,421 36,785 37,153 37,525 As Misc.
X.XXX.54919 Miscellaneous -IFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Misc.
Total Utility Operations $1,397,602 $1,479,164 $1,566,660 $1,660,537 $1,761,278 $1,869,400 $1,985,461 $2,110,062
.401.39 Forestry
.534.5039 Maintenance
X.XXX.5100l Reallocated labor Costs $26 658 $28,684 $30,864 $33,210 $35,734 $38,449 $41,371 $44,516 As labor
X.X.X.X.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 16000 16,160 16,322 16,485 16,650 16,816 16,984 17,154 As Mat/Supplies
XXX.X.53121 Utility Inventory 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 As Mat/Supplies
x x X.X.S351Q Small Tools & Equipment 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 32.127 32,448 32,773 33,100 33,431 33,766 34,103 34,444 As Equipment
XXX,X.5411Q Professional Services '10,000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Misc.
X,X,X.X.5422Q Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Supplies
X.XXX.54810 Rents - Equipment 7,500 7,575 7,651 7,727 7,805 7,883 7,961 8,041 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.548JO Structures & Ground Repair 2.500 2,525 2,550 2,576 2,602 2,628 2,654 2,680 As Misc.
X.x.X.X.5491O Equipment Repair 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 As Misc.
Total Maintenance $95,485 $98,199 $101,074 $104,122 $107,355 $110,787 $114,433 $118,308
6 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 6 of 7
WATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
Z004 2005 Z006 2007 Z008 2009 2010 2011 Basis of Classification
.534.9039 Other Operations
X.X.X.X.51Q01 Reallocated Labor Cost $274,683 $295,559 $318,021 $342,191 $368,198 $396,181 $426,290 $458,688 As Labor
X.X.X.X.5l0BO Overtime Pay (Cops Watershed Patrol) 40,000 43,040 46,311 49,831 53,618 57,693 62,077 66.795 As Labor
X,X.X,X.5311Q Office & Operating Supplies 25.000 25,250 25,503 25,758 26,015 26,275 26,538 26,803 As MaUSupplies
X.X.X.X.53121 Utility Inventory 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.X.X.53119 Operating Suppiies - Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat/Suppiies
X.X.X.X.53210 Vehicle Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
x.x.X.X.5351Q Small Tools & Equipment 2.000 2,020 2,040 2.061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Equipment
X.X.X.X.53530 Computer Related Items 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Equipment
X,X,X.X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 51.257 51,770 52,287 52,810 53,338 53,872 54,410 54,954 As Equipment
X.X,X.X.54110 Professional Services - External 65.500 30,000 30,300 30,603 30,909 31,218 31,530 31,846 As Misc.lbiosolids mgmt, misc
X,X.X.X.54210 Telecommunications SOD 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Misc.
x.x.x.x.54220 Postage 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Mat/Supplies
X.X.X.X.54300 Travel 1.000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Misc.
X.X,X.X.S4400 Advertis ing 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54520 Equipment 5.000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255 5,308 5,361 As Equipment
X.X.x.X.54710 Natural Gas 1,500 1,515 1,530 1,545 1,561 1,577 1,592 1,608 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54720 E iectricity 4,000 4,120 4,244 4,371 4,502 4,637 4,776 4,919 As Power
X.X.X.X.54740 Garbage 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54810 Equipment Repair 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Misc.
X.X.X.X.54820 Other Improvements 1.000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Misc.
XXX.X.54910 Miscellaneous 20.000 20,200 20,402 20,606 20,812 21,020 21,230 21,443 As Misc.
Total Other Operations $494,640 $484,280 $511,553 $540,800 $572,168 $605,820 $641,927 $680,674
Total Forestry $590,125 $582,480 $612,628 $644,922 $679,524 $716,607 $756,359 $798,981
Total O&M Expense $5,172,457 $5,293,609 $5,547,615 $5,819,151 $6,109,522 $6,420,131 $6,752,491 $7,108,225
Taxes/Transfer Payments
X.X.X.X 55100 Intergovern Service & Tax .$2Al~?~~,$234l8? $237,130 $239,501 $241,896 $244,315 $246,758 $249,226 5.029% of water sales
X.X.X.X.55409 Payment In-Lieu of Taxes '.519;27~ .'W: . 51{?J!l;2~; i,511 ,2g~f i* SQ)3,?Q4 . .i' .5l)~;tl'$2J,\t:t.. 1: 49~;9If-F', 1'); !/Qb!>70 "ft ~1i6,:t~f .8.5% of Retail Rate Rev + Timber
UUD Payment (12%) 120.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 One Time (
UUD Payment (City Ownership) 120.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 One Time
xx X.X553QO External Taxes & Assessments 4.000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 DOH Connection Surcharge
Total TaxeslTransfer Payments $995,063 $754,610 $752,426 $750,305 $748,248 $746,Z56 $752,828 $759,467
Total O&M Plus Taxes $6,167,520 $6,048,219 $6,300,042 $6,569,457 $6,857,770 $7,166,387 $7,505,319 $7,867,691
Debt Service
Existing PWTF 36" Water Main Garst $190.658 $189,000 $187,342 $185,684 $184.026 $182,368 $180.710 $179,053 Debt Schedule
Existing DWSRF - Corrosion Clrl/Reserv #4 $84.525 $83,463 $8U49 $79,236 $77.123 $75,010 $'72.897 $70,784 Est. Repmt Sched.
Existing DWSRF - Casad Dam Seismic Intake Tower 26,721 32,169 31,624 31,078 30,533 29.988 29,443 28,897 Est. Repmt Sched.
Existing DWSRF - East West Flow Imprvmts 2.060 2,025 1,990 1,955 1.920 1,885 1.850 1,816 Est. Repmt Sched.
Existing DWSRF - PS #4 Upgrade 0 (11,568 61,658 61,668 61,668 61,668 61,668 61,668 Est. Repmt Sched.
Existing DWSRF - Casad Dam Valve 0 7,426 '1.42.6 7,42.6 7,426 7,425 7.426 7,42.6 Est. Repmt Sched.
Existing DWSRF - NAD Park Bank Stabilization 0 29,lO5 29,70S 29,70S 2.9,'10S 29,70S 29,705 29,'70S Est. Repmt Sched.
New DWSRF - On-site Chlorination 0 S,883 f.),883 5,883 5,883 5,883 5.883 S,883
Existing Other - Capital Lease Pitney Bow 5,'186 5.186 5.186 5,186 5,186 5.186 5,186 5,186
New DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal DWSRF $118,492 $227,526 $224,832 $222,138 $219,445 $216,752 $214,059 $211,366 Calculated
7 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 7 of 7
WATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Basis of Classification
New Revenue Bond $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Debt Service $309,150 $416,526 $412,174 $407,822 $403,471 $399,120 $394,769 $390,419
Net Revenue Available for Capital Funding ($1,094,049) ($1,157,214) ($1,352,847) ($1,565,554) ($1,796,636) ($2,047,494) ($2,328,132) ($2,631,673)
Capital Improvements
Net CIP From Rates $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,030,000 $1,060,900 $1,092,727 From Capital Plan
Cash Working Capital $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL NET REV. REQUIREMENT $6,976,670 $7,064,745 $7,412,215 $7,777,278 $8,261,241 $8,595,507 $8,960,988 $9,350,837
Balance/(Deficiency} of Funds ($1,594,049) ($1,757,214) ($2,052,847) ($2,365,554) ($2,796,636) ($3,077,494) ($3,389,032) ($3,724,400)
Plus: Additional Taxes w/Rate Increase ($249,400) ($274,929) ($321,182) ($370,108) ($437,554) ($481,496) ($530,238) ($582,709)
Total Balance/(Deficiency) of Funds ($1,843,449) ($2,032,143) ($2,374,029) ($2,735,661) ($3,234,190) ($3,558,990) ($3,919,271) ($4,307,108)
Totallnc.l(Decrease) as a % of Rates 40.0% 43.5% 50.3% 57.4% 67.2% 73.3% 79.9% 86.9%
Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Water Utility - All Debt
Before Rate Increase 5.11 3.07 2.36 1.60 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00
After Rate Increase 11.07 7.95 8.12 8.31 8.79 8.80 9.10 9.42
Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Water Utility - Revenue Bond Debt
Before Rate Increase 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
After Rate Increase 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Combined Utility
Before Rate Increase 1.28 1.07 0.99 0.90 1.71 1.31 1.08 0.86
After Rate Increase 1.54 1.97 2.17 2.22 4.75 4.23 4.21 4.20
Debt service coverage = 1.30
Gross revenue of the system = all the eamings and revenue received by the system from any source including sale offorest products,
except; general ad valorem taxes, grants, refunded bond escrow acct eamings, gifts to system for capital purposes, proceeds from sale
of city property, proceeds from city or system obligations
Operating and Maintenance expenses = all reasonable expenses incurred by the City including insurance premiums. state imposed taxes
payment to another agency for treatment or sewage disposal, excluding depreciation, city imposed utility taxes or PILO T .
8 of 38
City of Bremerton - Water Department
SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND
APPLICATIONS OF FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Water Sales $3,604,669 $3,640,716 $3,677,123 $3,713,894 $3,751,033 $3,788,543 $3,826,429 $3,864,693
Navy (PSNS) Sales 1,004,416 1,027,848 1,038,126 1,048,507 1,058,993 1,069,582 1,080,278 1,091,081
Timber Sales 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue 773,536 638,967 644,119 649,323 654,579 659,887 665,248 670,663
Total Sources of Funds $5,382,621 $5,307,531 $5,359,368 $5,411,725 $5,464,604 $5,518,013 $5,571,955 $5,626,438
APPLICATIONS OF FUNDS
O&M Expenses $6,167,520 $6,048,219 $6,300,042 $6,569,457 $6,857,770 $7,166,387 $7,505,319 $7,867,691
Capital Outlays from Rates 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,030,000 1,060,900 1,092,727
Debt Service 309,150 416,526 412,174 407,822 403,471 399,120 394,769 390,419
TOTAL NET REVENUE REQUIREMENT $6,976,670 $7,064,745 $7,412,215 $7,777,278 $8,261,241 $8,595,507 $8,960,988 $9,350,837
BALANCE/DEFICIENCY OF FUNDS ($1,594,049) ($1,757,214) ($2,052,847) ($2,365,554) ($2,796,636) ($3,077,494) ($3,389,032) ($3,724,400)
Plus: Add'l Taxes w/Rate Increase ($249,400) ($274,929) ($321,182) ($370,108) ($437,554) ($481,496) ($530,238) ($582,709)
TOTAL BALANCE OF FUNDS ($1,843,449) ($2,032,143) ($2,374,029) ($2,735,661) ($3,234,190) ($3,558,990) ($3,919,271) ($4,307,108)
RATE ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED 40.0% 43.5% 50.3% 57.4% 67.2% 73.3% 79.9% 86.9%
PROPOSED RATE ADJUSTMENT 30.0% 15.0% 10.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0%
ADDITIONAL REVENUE WITH RATE ADJUSTMENT $691,363 $2,310,939 $3,038,978 . $3,304,321 $3,581,786 $3,871,875 $4,175,113 $4,492,044
BALANCE/DEFICIENCY OF FUNDS ($1,152,087) $278,796 $664,949 $568,660 $347,596 $312,886 $255,843 $184,935
ADDITIONAL RATE ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED 25.00% .5.97% -14.10% -11.94% . -7.23% -6.44% -5.21% -3.73%
Current Residential Rate (10ccf, 3/4" meter) $13.01 $16.91 $19.45 $21.40 $22.04 $22.70 $23.38 $24.08
Rate Impact with Increase $3.90 $2.54 $1.95 $0.64 $0.66 $0.68 $0.70 $0.72
Total Monthly Rate with Increase $16.91 $19.45 $21.40 $22.04 $22.70 $23.38 $24.08 $24.80
Working Capital
Beginning Balance $700,000 $0 $278,796 $943,745 $1,512,405 $1,860,000 $2,172,886 $2,428,729
Plus: Additional 0 278,796 664,949 568,660 347,596 312,886 255,843 184,935
Less: Uses (1,152,087) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ending Working Capital ($452,087) $278,796 $943,745 $1,512,405 $1,860,000 $2,172,886 $2,428,729 $2,613,664
Minimum Target 15% O&M plus Taxes $925,128 $907,233 $945,006 $985,418 $1,028,666 $1,074,958 $1,125,798 $1,180,154
Capital Fund
Ending Balance $728,751 $1,251,751 $1,703,751 $1,296,751 $916,751 $232,751 $875,651 $800,378
Total Working Capital and Capital Fund $276,664 $1,530,547 $2,647,496 $2,809,156 $2,776,751 $2,405,637 $3,304,380 $3,414,042
Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Water Utility - All Debt
Before Rate Increase 5.11 3.07 2.36 1.60 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00
After Rate Increase 7.34 8.62 9.74 9.70 9.65 9.58 9.75 9.89
9 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WATER DEPARTMENT Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT 2A
CAPITAL FUNDING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Beginning Balance $0 $728,751 $1,251,751 $1,703,751 $1,296,751 $916,751 $232,751 $875,651
Total Capital Projects
Water Main Replacement Program 100,000 275,000 275,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 $2,150,000
Miscellaneous Supply Improvements 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 750,000
Anderson Creek Wellfield - Eastside Flow & Pressure 600,000 400,000 0 A, 0 0 0 0 1,000,000
Water System Security Improvements 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Annual Acquisition of Replacment Meters 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 375,000
Road Maintenance and Abandonment Plan (RMAP) 25,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 165,000
Pump Station Reconstruction - 2004 PS#4 Westhills 31,500 1,028,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,059,500
Stabilization Projects 50,000 460,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 510,000
Misc Equipment Dept 33 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 80,000
Seismic Upgrades 585,000 720,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,505,000
Source and Pump Station Flow Meters 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000
Tracy ton Water District Improvements Phase II 725,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 725,000
West 580 PS#2A, 12" Trans. Main 1,350.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,350,000
Anderson Creek PS#2 and Well 7&8 85,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85,000
Oyster Bay Facility, yard, roof, tile replacement 0 54,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 54,000
West 650 12" OM, Reservoir #23, 12" OM 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
HB Valve 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Design and Construction of Ultraviolet Treatment 0 0 300,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 2,300,000
12" Dist Water Main - Shorewood Drive to Res 21 0 330,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 330,000
12" Dist Water Main - Pine to Flagstone 0 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000
3000 Road Culvert Replacement 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000
24" Pipe on C Street from Oyster Bay to National Avenue 0 0 0 0 250,000 1,250,000 0 0 1,500,000
Twin Lakes Diversion Improvement 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000
Cover for Dewatering Facility 0 0 0 0 0 307,000 0 0 307,000
Loop Main on West Kitsap Lake Road 0 0 380,000 0 0 0 0 0 380,000
Loop Main on Lakehurst Drive & PSE 0 0 0 81,000 0 0 0 0 81,000
Replace Well 18 Pump and Motor 0 0 63,000 0 0 0 0 0 63,000
Bypass Tunnel Below McKenna Falls Weir 0 0 0 50,000 200,000 0 0 0 250,000
Booster Station 3 (Lafayette) & PRV Upgrade 0 0 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000
490 Zone Extension on Sylvan 0 0 0 486,000 0 0 0 0 486,000
12" Main on McWilliams Rd. From Me Williams Ct. to Pine Rd. 0 0 0 171,000 0 0 0 0 171,000
E. 18th St. Loop 0 0 0 113,000 0 0 0 0 113,000
36" Main Davis Street Connector 0 0 0 126,000 0 0 0 0 126,000
Gold Mountain Gold Course Irrigation 0 0 0 0 650,000 0 0 0 650,000
Storage Improvements W440 & 398 Zones 0 0 0 0 0 0 416,000 1,000,000 1,416,000
Reservoir No. 14 Demolition 0 0 0 0 0 0 341,000 0 341,000
Re-Drill Well #9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 332,000 332,000
Well #9 Chlorination &'Telemetry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166,000 166,000
Manette Bridge Water Main 2004 Isolation Valve 136,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 136,000
12" Dist Water Main - 13th St & High & Ohio 0 0 0 0 0 640,000 0 0 640,000
Pine Road - Me Williams to Well 21 12" Water Main 0 0 0 0 0 137,000 0 0 137,000
398-490 Zone Conversion & PRV 0 0 0 0 0 0 281,000 0 281,000
Marine Drive from Cedar Dr. North 8" Water Main 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290,000 290,000
Other Unscheduled Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Project Costs $4,147,500 $3,597,000 $1,648,000 $2,507,000 $2,580,000 $2,814,000 $1,518,000 $2,268,000 $21,079,500
10 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WATER DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 2A
CAPITAL FUNDING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Less: Funding Sources
Annual Rate Funded Capital S500, ADO $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 ,$1,000,000 $1,030,000 $1,060,900 $1,092,727 $6,783,627
System Development Charges 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 800,000
Timber Sales 1,500,000 1.400,000 1,300,000 1,200,000 1,100,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 9,500,000
Sale of Assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grants 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 800,000
State Loan. DWSRF 1,960,000 2,020,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,980,000
Intertund Loan Payment - Pendergast 16,251 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,251
Revenue Bonds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding Sources $4,876,251 $4,120,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,200,000 $2,130,000 $2,160,900 $2,192,727 $21,879,878
Additional Capital Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Endin!! Capital Reserves $728,751 $1,251,751 $1,703,751 $1,296,751 $916,751 $232,751 $875,651 $800,378
Target Funding; Annual Average Capital or $225,000 $420,000 $445,000 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000 $470,000
1,5% ofOr/ginal Plant Value $784,465
11 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WATER DEPARTMENT Page 1 of 8
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 Total
Total Capital Projects
Water Main Replacement Program 100,000 275,000 275,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 2,150,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $100,000 $275,000 $275,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $2,150,000
Miscellaneous Supply Improvements 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 750,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $75,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $750,000
Anderson Creek Wellfield - Eastside Flow & Pressure 600,000 400,000 0 0 0 1,000,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $500,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Internally Funded $100,000 ($100,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Water System Security Improvements 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Annual Acquisition of Replacment Meters 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 375,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0
Internally Funded $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 375,000
Road Maintenance and Abandonment Plan (RMAP) 25,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 165,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0
Internally Funded $25,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 165,000
12 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WATER DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 8
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 Total
Total Capital Projects
Pump Station Reconstruction - 2004 PS#4 Westhills 31,500 1,028,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,059,500
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 20,000 1,040,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,060,000
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $20,000 $1,040,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1,060,000
Internally Funded $11,500 ($12,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (500)
Stabilization Projects 50,000 460,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 510,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 30,000 480,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 510,000
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $30,000 $480,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 510,000
Internally Funded $20,000 ($20,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0
Misc Equipment Dept 33 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 80,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $80,000
Seismic Upgrades 585,000 720,000 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,505,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 585,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 585,000
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 o. 0 0 0
Total Funding $585,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $585,000
Internally Funded $0 $720,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $920,000
Source and Pump Station Flow Meters 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
Tracy ton Water District Improvements Phase II 725,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 725,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 725,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 725,000
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $725,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $725,000
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
13 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WA TER DEPARTMENT Page 3 of 8
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 Total
Total Capital Projects
West 580 PS#2A, 12" Trans. Main 1,350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,350,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,350,000
Anderson Creek PS#2 and Well 7&8 85,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000
Oyster Bay Facility, yard, roof, tile replacement 0 54,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 54,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $54,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,000
West 650 12" DM, Reservoir #23,12" DM 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant (Emergency Services RC) 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000
Total Funding $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000
Internally Funded ($200,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($200,000)
HB Valve 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design and Construction of Ultraviolet Treatment 0 0 300,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 2,300,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $300,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000
14 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WATER DEPARTMENT Page 4 of 8
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Total Capital Projects
12" Dist Water Main - Shorewood Drive to Res 21 0 330,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 330,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $330,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $330,000
12" Dist Water Main - Pine to Flagstone 0 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000
3000 Road Culvert Replacement 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
24" Pipe on C Street from Oyster Bay to National Avenue 0 0 0 0 250,000 1,250,000 0 0 1,500,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $1,250,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Twin Lakes Diversion Improvement 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Cover for Dewatering Facility 0 0 0 0 0 307,000 0 0 307,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $307,000 $0 $0 $307,000
15 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WA TER DEPARTMENT Page 5 of 8
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 Total
Total Capital Projects
Loop Main on West Kitsap Lake Road 0 0 380,000 0 0 0 0 0 380,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $380,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $380,000
Loop Main on Lakehurst Drive & PSE 0 0 0 81,000 0 0 0 0 81,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $81,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $81,000
Replace Well 18 Pump and Motor 0 0 63,000 0 0 0 0 0 63,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $63,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $63,000
Bypass Tunnel Below McKenna Falls Weir 0 0 0 50,000 200 000 0 0 0 250,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Booster Station 3 (Lafayette) & PRV Upgrade 0 0 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
490 Zone Extension on Sylvan 0 0 0 486,000 0 0 0 0 486,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $486,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $486,000
16 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WATER DEPARTMENT Page 6 of 8
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 Total
Total Capital Projects
12" Main on McWilliams Rd. From Mc Williams CI. to Pine R 0 0 0 171,000 0 0 0 0 171,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $171,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $171,000
E. 18th SI. Loop 0 0 0 113,000 0 0 0 0 113,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $113,000
36" Main Davis Street Connector 0 0 0 126,000 0 0 0 0 126,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $126,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $126,000
Gold Mountain Gold Course Irrigation 0 0 0 0 650,000 0 0 0 650,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $650,000
Storage Improvements W440 & 398 Zones 0 0 0 0 0 0 416,000 1,000,000 1,416,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $416,000 $1,000,000 $1,416,000
Reservoir No. 14 Demolition 0 0 0 0 0 0 341,000 0 341,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $341,000 $0 $341,000
17 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WA TER DEPARTMENT Page 7 of 8
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 Total
Total Capital Projects
Re-Drill Well #9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 332,000 332,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $332,000 $332,000
Well #9 Chlorination & Telemetry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166,000 166,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $166,000 $166,000
Manette Bridge Water Main 2004 Isolation Valve 136,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 136,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $136,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $136,000
12" Dist Water Main - 13th St & High & Ohio 0 0 0 0 0 640,000 0 0 640,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $640,000 $0 $0 $640,000
Pine Road - Mc Williams to Well 21 12" Water Main 0 0 0 0 0 137,000 0 0 137,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $137,000 $0 $0 $137,000
398-490 Zone Conversion & PRV 0 0 0 0 0 0 281,000 0 281,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $281,000 $0 $281,000
18 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
WA TER DEPARTMENT Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT 28
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20111 Total
Total Capital Projects
Marine Drive from Cedar Dr. North 8" Water Main 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 290,000 290,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $290,000 $290,000
Other Unscheduled Projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWSRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Capital Projects $4,147,500 $3,597,000 $1,648,000 $2,507,000 $2,580,000 $2,814,000 $1,518,000 $2,268,000 21,079,500
19 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 3
DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMODITY
ALLOCATION FACTOR
CUSTOMER CLASS
Retail City
Retail - County - (Includes Port)
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
Wholesale
Firelines
Actual Water Production
Allocation Factor
Notes:
Water Flow
(CCF)
[1] Losses:
5.0%
Total
Water Flow
% of
Total
1,688,659
651,960
873,280
64,857
o
3,278,756
84,433
32,598
43,664
3,243
o
163,938
1,773,092
684,558
916,944
68,100
o
3,442,694
3,576,016
51.50%
19.88%
26.63%
1.98%
0.00%
100%
(COM)
[1J Assumed unaccounted for water percentage of less than 5.4%
from page 2-22 section 2.4.2 in 1999 Updated Water Compo Plan
[2J Surcharge applied to outside city customers only.
[3J 2002 Water Production and Consumption Report
20 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 4
DEVELOPMENT OF CAPACITY
ALLOCATION FACTORS
CUSTOMER CLASS
Retail City
Retail - County - (Includes Port)
puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
Wholesale
Firelines
Total
Peak Day 2002
Allocation Factor
Notes:
Average Total Peak
Day Use Peaking Day Use % of
(MGD) Factor (MGD) Total
3.63 2.20 7.99 52.15%
1.40 2.20 3.09 20.13%
1.88 1.55 2.91 19.00%
0.14 2.20 0.31 2.00%
0.00 0.00 0.00 6.71% [4]
7.06 14.30 100%
14.30 [5]
(CAP)
% of
Total
7.99 65.49%
3.09 25.28%
0.00 0.00%
0.31 2.52%
0.00 6.71 %
11.39 100%
(CAP W/O N)
[4J Represents stand-by peak capacity use.
(2,000 gal/min (x) 180 min / total peak day use)
[5J 2002 Water Production and Consumption Report
21 of 38
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 5
DEVELOPMENT OF CUSTOMER
ALLOCATION FACTORS
CUSTOMER CLASS
Retail City
Retail - County - (Includes Port)
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
Wholesale
Firelines
Total
Alloet/on Factor
Notes:
Customer Service & Accounting Meters & Services
Number of % of Weighting Weighted % of Weighting Weighted % of
Meters [6] Total Factor [7] Customer Total Factor [7] Customer Total
10.481 62.47% 62.5% 1.00 10.481 60.50% $100 1,048,100 59.82%
5.488 32.71% 32.7% 1.00 5,488 31.68% $100 548,800 31.32%
3 0.02% 0.0% 25.00 75 0.43% $3,000 9,000 0.51%
585 3.49% 3.5% 2.00 1,170 6.75% $250 146,250 8.35%
220 1.31% 1.3% 0.50 110 0.63% $0 0 0.00%
16,777 100.0% 100.0% 17,324 100% 1,752,150 100%
(AG) (WCA) (WCMS)
[6J City provided no. of customers as of December 2002
[7J Weighting factors for customer services and accounting for the classes ranged from 0.5 to 2.0, PSNS at 25.0
The range for customer meters and services was from $100 - residential to $3,000 - industrial which was
based on a equivalent meter and service ratio in A WWA M1 manual.
22 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 6
DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC FIRE
PROTECTION ALLOCATION FACTOR
CUSTOMER CLASS
Retail City
Retail - County - (Includes Port)
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
Wholesale
Firelines
Total
Alloctlon Factor
Notes:
Fire Proto Total PFP
Number of Requiremts Duration Requirements % of
Accounts (gals/min.) [8] (minutes) (1,000 gals) Total
10,481 1,000 120 1 ,257,720 65.48% 66%
5,488 1,000 120 658,560 34.29% 34%
3 5,000 300 4,500 0.23% 0%
585 0 120 0 0.00% 0%
220 0 0 0 0.00% 0%
16,777 1,920,780 100%
(FP)
[8J Fire prDtectiDn requirements obtained frDm 1999 Water System Plan Update
page 7-2. Requirements fDr the "all Dther" class ranged from
1,000 gpm, two (2) hDur duratiDn, fDr residential tD 5,000 gpm, five (5)
hDur duratiDn, for PSNS.
23 Df 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 7
DEVELOPMENT OF REVENUE
RELATED ALLOCATION FACTOR
Revenues Revenues at
At Present % of Present Rates % of
CUSTOMER CLASS Rates Total (w/o PSNS) Total
Retail City $2,085,740 45.3% $2,085,740 57.9%
Retail - County - (Includes Port) 1,324,486 28.7% 1,324,486 36.7%
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) 1,004,416 21.8% 0 0.0%
Wholesale 110,122 2.4% 110,122 3.1%
Firelines 84,321 1.8% 84,321 2.3%
Total $4,609,085 100.0% $3,604,669 100.0%
Alloction Factor (RR) (RR-NOPSNS)
24 of 38
CITY OF 8REMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 8
FUNCTIONALlZATION AND CLASSIFICATION
OF PLANT IN SERVICE
Account Desc.
Source of Supply
171 Land w Watershed
173 Bld& Structures - Wells
173 BId & Structures. Dam
173 BId & Structures
179 Other Improvements
188 Machinery & Equipment
188.8 General Assets
Total Source of Supply
Treatment
173 Building & Structures
178 other Improvements
18B Machinery & Equipment
IBM General Assets
Total Treatment
Storage
171 Land
113 ReservOirs
179 Other Improvements
188 Machinery & Equipment
Total Storage
Transmission
171 Land
173 BUilding & Structures
1BB Machinery & Equipment
Total Transmission
Distribution
173 BUilding & Structures
,~~~,,'~~~~ ~~~~em.;~~ts
V. ,M.I",cS",Ii':131 ,* 'c
178 Mains 16" -36"
1711 Hydrants
179 Services
178 Firs Services
188 Meters
179 GeneralAssets
Total Distribution
Pumping
173 Building & Structures
179 Other Improvements
188 Machinery & EqUipment
Total Pumping
Total Plant before General
GtJneral/Admmlstration Plant
171 land
173 BUilding & Structures
179 Other Improvements
1BB Machinery & Equipment
1BB General Assets
Total General Plant/Admin
Total Plant In Service
Total Plant
as of 10/2003
$2,886,657
567,657
1,499,013
905,545
1,668,109
1,835,643
121,325
$9,483,949
100.0%
$1,072,248
239,865
700,923
121452
$2,134,488
$19,510
3,121,641
25,526
187200
$3,353,877
$64,673
161,229
9,850
$235,752
$339,702
708,933
c, ;'~~~~~~;~~:: ft :4'~
10,619,840
1,247,590
2,356,197
336,834
4,586,269
177,195
$33,524,090
$764,083
71,911
906151
$1,742,145
$50,474,301
100.00%
$114,570
1,167,553
150,979
32,847
357,411
$1,823,360
$52,297,661
100.00%
Page 1 ot2
$1,414,462
278,152
734,516
443,717
817,373
899,465
59,449
$4,647,135
490%
$1,072,248
239,865
700,923
121,452
$2,134,488
$1,472,195
289,505
764,497
461,828
850,736
936,178
61,876
$4,836,814
51.0%
$0
o
o
o
$0
$18,925
3,027,992
24,760
181584
$3,253,261
$0
o
o
o
$0
$29,287
61,121
2;~~~:.~
o
o
o
o
o
15,277
$2,890.281
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
0.0%
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
0.0%
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$19,811 $57,695
41,343 120,406
':u1Jla3,~~ ""q-:<,~ ''o}}>
ii.1fll>'1 ~,'M:41}f.
o 3,292,150
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
10,334 30,095
$1,955,050 $5,693,759
$0
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$6,781,623 $18,485,435 $2,890,281 $1,955,050 $5,693,759
13.44% 36.62% 5.73% 3.87% 11.28%
$15.393
156,870
20,285
4,413
48,021
$244,983
$0
o
o
$0
$64,673
161,229
9850
$235,752
$6,561
66,857
8,645
1,881
20,466
$104,410
54,438
45,223
5,848
1,272
13,844
$70,625
$12,924
131,706
17,031
3,705
40,318
$205,684
$0 $85,295
o 178,004
.~ {~~:~~: r~;2i1Jg:
o 4,867,006
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 0
o 44,491
$0 $8,417,463
$0
o
o
$0
$764,083
71,911
906,151
$1,742,145
$7,026,606 $19,153,212 $2,994,691 $2,025,675 $5,899,443
13.44% 36.62% 5.73% 3.87% 11.28%
$41,959
427,598
55,294
12,030
130,896
$667,778
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
0.0%
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
3~~
$0
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
0.0%
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$0
o
'f\~,."
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
$73,018
152.384
'ofT-rO"
~. "\~ '<: . 00
o
o
2,356,197
o
4,586,269
38,088
$7,205,956
$0
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
0.0%
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
00%
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0 $585
o 93,649
o 766
o 5616
$0 $100,616
$0
o
o
$0
$0 $0
o 0
o 0
$0 $0
$14,807 $59,788
30,902 124,773
,jA~t8tg }!f:Il(;Q,44~
o 2,460,684
o 1,247,590
o 0
o 336,834
o 0
7724 31,187
$1,461,282 $5,900,299
$0
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$0 $7,205,956 $1,461,282 $6,000,916
0.00% 14.28% 2.90% 11.89%
$0 $16,357
o 166,686
o 21,554
o 4,689
o 51,026
$0 $260,312
$3,317
33,802
4,371
951
10,347
$52,788
$13,621
138,811
17.950
3,905
42493
$216,780
$0 $7,466,268 $1,514,070 $6,217,696
0.00% 14.28% 2.90% 11.89%
25 of 38
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
0,0%
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$0
0.00%
$0
0.00%
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
0.0%
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$0
o
0'
'(ki',;.
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$0
0.00%
$0
o
o
o
o
$0
$0
0.00%
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
0.0%
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
o
o
$0
Ba5/5 of Clilssificatlon
$0 49% Com 51% Cap
o 49% Com 51% Cap
o 49% Com 51% Cap
o 49% Com 51% Cap
o 49% Com 51% Cap
o 49% Com 51% Cap
o 49% Com 51% Cap
$0
0.0%
$0 100% Com
o 100% Com
o 1000k Com
o 100% Com
$0
$0 97%
o 97%
o 97%
o 97%
$0
Cap 3% FP
Cap 30A, FP
Cap 3% FP
Cap 3% FP
$0 0%
o 0%
o 0%
$0
Com 100% Cap
Com 100% Cap
Com 100% Cap
$0 As other Dist Plant
o As Other Dlst Plant
, :'1~tC , ~'::,~:'~t :~'~~~,ig;Wt?~~"
o 46% Cap 31% AC
o 100% FP
o 100% WCMS
o 100% FP
o 100% WCMS
o As other Dist Plant
$0
t~~i~~ ~I~:i
23% FP
$0 0%
o 0%
o 0%
$0
Com 100% Cap
Com 100% Cap
Com 100% Cap
$0
0.00%
$0 As Total Pit. Before General
o As Total PIt. Before General
o As Total Pit Before General
o As Total Pit. Before General
o As Total Pit. Before General
$0
$0
0.00%
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 8
FUNCTIONALlZATlON ANO CLASSIFICATIoN
OF PLANT IN SERVIcE
Account Desc.
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
191.9 Intangible Plant
173.9 BUildings & structures
179.9 Other Improvements
1ee.9 Machinery & EqUipment
166.95 General Assets
Total Accumulated Depreciation
Net Plant In Service
Plus Cash Working Capital
1/8 O&M Expense
Prepayments
Inventories (materials and supplies)
Total Cash Working Capital
Less Contributtons in Aid of Construction
less Net Navy Capital Charge (1) & [21
Net Contributions In Aid of Construction
NET RATE BASE
Total Plant
as of 10/2003
$166,487
3,606,024
8,751,796
2,556.834
427,525
15,508,666
Commodity
Icm.il
$22,369
1,687,168
302,158
1,117,245
125 897
$3,254,837
Actual
Capacity Capacity Customer
.ICAPI (CAP WIO NI lAC wo Nl
$60,973 $9,533 $6,449 $18,781
1.331,909 67,382 45,579 132,740
2,545,000 800,418 541,420 961,722
1,424,259 1.309 886 2,580
130,484 19657 13296 38724
$5,492,625 $898,299 $607,630 $1,154,546
Actual
Customer
IACI
Customer Related
Weighted For:
Customer Meters & Fire
Acctg. Services Protection
IWCAI IWCMS' 'FP wo N
Fire
Protection
IF PI
$36,788,995 $3,771.769 $13,660,588 $2,096,391 $1,418,046 $4,744,a97
100.00% 10.25% 37.13% 5.70% 3.85% 12.90%
$661,701 $172,379 $230.942 $23,690 $16,024 $56,801
0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
415,630 55,843 152,218 23,800 16,099 46 885
$1,077,331 $228,223 $383,160 $47,490 $32,123 $103,686
$19,093,455 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
4,222,229 0 0 0 0 0
14,871,226 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$22,995,100 $3,999,992 $14,043,748 $2,143,881 $1,450,169 $4,848,583
$0 $23,768 $4,820 $19,794
0 167,994 34,067 139,186
0 1,995,576 404,679 1,200,824
0 3,265 662 6,629
0 49,008 9,938 40,520
$0 $2,239,611 $454,166 $1,406,952
$0 $5,226,657 $1,059,904 $4,810,744
0,00% 14.21% 2.88% 13.08%
$32,869 $62,655 $11,977 $54,363
$0 $0 $0 $0
0 59,337 12033 49,414
$32,869 $121,992 $24,010 $103,777
$0 $0 $0 $0
0 0 0 0
$0 $0 $0 $0
$32,869 $5,348,649 $1,083,914 $4,914,521
Page 2 of2
Revenue Direct Assignment
Related Navy All Other
(RRI IOA-Nl (DA-OI Basis of Classlflcation
$0 $0 $0 As Plant In Service
0 0 o As Bldgs & Structures
0 0 o As Other Improvements
0 0 o As Mach & Equip
0 0 o As General Assets
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
$0 $0 $0 As O&M Expenses
$0 $0 $0 As O&M Expenses
0 0 o As General Plant
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $19,093,455 As DA All other
0 0 4,222,229 As DA All Other
$0 $0 $14,871,226
$0 $0 ($14,871,226)
26 of 38
[1] Net navy capital charges IS deducted from contnbutions In aid to mdicate that this capital payment was to compensate the City for capital costs and is not a "true" capItal contnbution and should not be used to reduce rate base.
[2] Navy contribution depreciated as follows: Prior Study Per Year Amort Seven Yrs
ContractAmt 1f.i:l2.44% Total Amort
5,091,931 124,243 869,702
Distribution Storage
Fire Flow Requirements
hrs
240
gall/minute
4,000
Total
960,000 from water complan
Storage Capacity
34,240,000 gallons page 5-11 section 5.7 storage
Public Fire Protection
Capacity
3%
97%
Source of Supply
Capacity/Commodity
Average Day
Peak Day
7.06 Comm
14.30 1-comm=Cap
49%
51%
Distribution Main Analysis
Installed
MtrSize Length (It) Repicmt $ Total City uses $7-$9 per inch diameter depending on surface restoration
<=2" 89405 $ 18.00 $1,609,290 2 $9.00 18
2.5 89 $ 20.00 $1,780 $8.00 20
3 10,490 $ 24.00 $251,760 24
4 132,399 $ 32.00 $4,236,768 32
6 418,352 $ 48.00 $20,080,896 46.241% 48
8 530,430 $ 64.00 $33,947,520 64
10 46,466 $ 80.00 $3,717,280 80
12 179,638 $ 96.00 $17,245,248 96
1,407,269 81,090,542 (4)
16" 24,853 0
18" 50,659 0
20" 2,273 0
24" 37,445 0
27" 4,931 0
28" 13,172 0
30" 2,048 0
36" 17,325 0
1,559,975 $ 364.00 $160,571,794
Customer%
(1) Total @ 2" Equiv
fT otal Cost
$25,330,842
31%
Capacity
(2) Cost for 2-6"
(3) Equiv 6" for larger
1+2-3/4
$26,180,494
$36,313,632
46%
Fire Protection
1-comm-cap
23%
27 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 9
ALLOCATION OF RATE BASE
Retail Retail Basis of
Classification Comnonents Rate Base Inside Outside PSNS Wholesale Firelines Allocation
Commodity Related $3,999,992 $2,060,117 $795,373 $1,065,377 $79,124 $0 (COM)
Capacity Related $14,043,748 $7,323,711 $2,827,550 $2,668,405 $281,285 $942,797 (CAP)
Capacity Related With Out Navy $2,143,881 $1,403,982 $542,051 $0 $53,923 $143,925 (CAP WIO N)
Customer Related
- Actual Customer without Navy $1,450,169 $906,118 $474,456 $0 $50,575 $19,020 (AC wo N)
- Actual Customer $4,848,583 $3,029,028 $1,586,042 $867 $169,066 $63,580 (AC)
- Weighted for:
Customer Accounting $32,869 $19,886 $10,413 $142 $2,220 $209 (WCA)
Meters & Services 5,348,649 $3,199,452 $1,675,278 $27,474 $446,446 $0 (WCMS)
Total Customer Related $11,680,270 $7,154,483 $3,746,189 $28,483 $668,307 $82,809
Fire Protection Related $1,083,914 $711,410 $372,504 $0 $0 $0 (FP wo N)
Fire Protection Related $4,914,521 $3,218,011 $1,684,996 $11,514 $0 $0 (FP)
Revenue Related $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (RR)
Direct Assignment - Navy $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (DA)
Direct Assignment - All Other ($14,871,226) ($9,518,973) ($4,362,442) $0 ($495,655) ($494,156) As All Other Allocations
Total Net Allocated Rate Base $22,995,100 $12,352,740 $5,606,222 $3,773,779 $586,985 $675,374
28 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 10
FUNCTIONALlZA TION AND CLASSIFICATION
OF EXPENSES
Customer Related
Weighted For:
Actual Customer Meters &
Fire
Direct Assignment
Actual
Fire
Budget Commodity Capacity Capacity Customer Customer Acctg. Services Protection Protection Revenue Related Navy ~II Other
Acct. No. Account Desc. CY 2004 (COM) ICAP) ICAP WIO N) lAC wO N) (AC) IWCA) IWCMS) IFP wO N) IFP) (RR) R-NOPSNS) IDA-Nl IDA.O) Basis of
401.34.534,103<1 Water Administration
X.x.x.X.510Q1 Labor/Benefits $149,062 $15,282 $55,350 $8,494 $5,746 $19,225 $0 $21,177 $4,295 $19,492 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Plant I
X.x.X.x.5D750 Reallocated Equipment Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant i
x.x.x.x.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 17,000 1,743 6,312 969 655 2,193 0 2,415 490 2,223 0 0 0 o As Plant i
X.x.x.X.S3119 Office Supplies - Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant i
X.X.X.X.S3510 Small Tools & Equipment 5,000 513 1,857 285 193 645 0 710 144 654 0 0 0 o As Plant i
X.x.x.X.53530 Computer Related Items 5,000 513 1,857 285 193 645 0 710 144 654 0 0 0 o As Plant I
x.x.X.X.5400Q Reallocated Vehicle Costs 21,345 2,166 7,926 1,216 823 2,753 0 3,033 615 2,791 0 0 0 o As Plant I
X.X.X.X.5411O Prof. Services 10,000 1,025 3,713 570 365 1,290 0 1,421 288 1,308 0 0 0 o As Plant J
x.x.x.x.54119 Professional Services ~ Interfund 365,028 37,424 135,543 20,801 14,070 47,080 0 51,860 10,517 47,733 0 0 0 o As Plant j
X.xX.X.5421o Telecommunications 35,000 3,588 12,996 1,994 1.349 4,514 0 4,972 1,008 4,577 0 0 0 o As Plant I
XX.X.X.5422o Postage 4,500 0 0 0 0 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.x.x.x.5430o Travel 1,500 154 557 85 58 193 0 213 43 196 0 0 0 o As Plant i
xx.xx.54400 Advertising 500 51 186 26 19 64 0 71 14 65 0 0 0 o As Plant j
XX.X.x.54520 Equipment Rental 1,260 129 468 72 49 163 0 179 36 165 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X.54619 Insurance Premiums -lnterfund 150,611 15.441 55,925 6,562 5,905 19.425 0 21,397 4,339 19,695 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X.54810 EqUipment Repair 2,604 267 967 146 100 336 0 370 75 341 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X.54910 Miscellaneous 14,000 1,435 5199 796 540 1,806 0 1989 403 1,831 0 0 0 o As Plant i
Total Administration $782,410 $79,755 $266,856 $44,329 $29,965 $104,632 $0 $110,519 $22.412 $101,724 $0 $0 $0 $0
.534.1034 Customer Service
XXX.X.51001 Reallocated Labor Costs $240,660 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 100%
XX.X.X.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.5353510 Small Tools and Equipment 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.x.X.X.5353D Computer Related Items 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.x.X.X.5400D Reallocated VehIcle Costs 4,753 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,753 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
X.xX.X.54110 ProfeSSional Services (PSE billing) 22,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.54119 Professional Services Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.5421Q Telecommunication 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
X X.X.X 54220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.5430Q Travel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.x.X545Z0 Equipment Rental 625 0 0 0 0 0 0 825 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.54810 Equipment Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.54910 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As alt oth
Total Cust. Service & Marketing $280,258 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $252,180 $28,078 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Water Administration $1,052,668 $79,755 $288,856 $44,329 $29,985 $104,832 $252,180 $138,597 $22,412 $101,724 $0 $0 $0 $0
Engineering
.534.8037 Operations
XX.X.X.51001 Reallocated Labor Costs $215,482 $22,092 $80,013 $12,279 $8,306 $27,792 $0 $30,614 $6,206 $26,178 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Plant J
XX.X.X.53120 Office & Operating Supplies 2,000 205 743 114 77 258 0 284 58 262 0 0 0 o As Planti
XX.X.X.53510 Small Tools & EqUipment 1,000 103 371 57 39 129 0 142 29 131 0 0 0 o As Plant 1
XX.x.X.535JO Computer Related Items 9,000 923 3,342 513 347 1,161 0 1,279 259 1,177 0 0 0 o As Plant i
X,X.X.X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 14,665 1,504 5,445 636 565 1,891 0 2,063 423 1,916 0 0 0 o As Planti
X,X,X.X.54110 Prof. Services - External 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o A6 Plant I
XX.XX.54210 Telecommunications 600 62 223 34 23 77 0 85 17 78 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XXXX.54300 Travel 850 87 316 48 33 110 0 121 24 111 0 0 0 o As Plant I
X.X:.X.X.54220 Postage 100 10 37 6 4 13 0 14 3 13 0 0 0 o As Plant I
XX.X.X.54119 Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant i
x.x:.x.x.54520 Rents - Equipment 1,800 165 686 103 69 232 0 256 52 235 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX X X.51310 Equipment Repair 1,000 103 371 57 39 129 0 142 29 131 0 0 0 o As Planti
XX.X.X.54910 Miscellaneous 1,000 103 371 57 39 129 0 142 29 131 0 0 0 o As Planti
Total Engineermg Operations $247,497 $25,374 $91,901 $14,103 $9,540 $31,921 $0 $35,162 $7,130 $32,364 $0 $0 $0 $0
29 of 38
Page 1 of 4
Classification
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
AC
n Service
n SerVice
n Service
n SerVice
n Service
n Service
WCA
WCA
WCMS
WCA
WCMS
WCMS
WCA
AC
AC
AC
WGMS
WGMS
er Gust Exp.
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 10
FUNCTIONALlZATION AND CLASSIFICATION
OF EXPENSES
Customer Related
Weighted For:
Actual Customer Meters &
Fire
Fire
Direct Assignment
Actual
Budget Commodity Capacity Capacity Customer Customer Acctg. Services Protection Protection Revenue Related Navy~1I Other
Acct. No. Account Desc. CY 2004 (COM) (CAP) (CAP WID N) lAC wo N) lAC} (WCA) (WCMS) IFPwoN) (FP' (RR R-NDPSNS) fDA-N} (DA-D' Sasls of
40131 Water Resource Manager
X.X53".5031 Mamtenance
XX.X.X.5070D Reallocated Labor Cost $204,533 $100,221 $104,312 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Soure
XX.X..x.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 35,000 17,150 17,850 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
XX.X.X.53121 Utility Inventory 1,500 735 765 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
X.xX.X.53119 Operating Supp. -Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
x.x.x.x.53219 Fuel Consumed -IFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
XX.x.X.5351Q Small Tools & Equipment 7,000 3,430 3,570 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
X.x.x.X.53530 Computer Related Items 1,000 490 510 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
x.x.x.x.53520 Small EqUipment & Furniture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XX.x.X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
x.x.x.x.54110 Professional Services - External 25,000 12,250 12,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
x.x.x.x.54220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
X-X.XX.54$20 Equipment 5,000 2.450 2,550 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
x.x.x.x.54740 Garbage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
x.x.x.x.5.4810 Equipment Repair 10,000 4,900 5,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
x.x.x.x.54619 Equipment Repair -Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XX.X.X.54820 other Improvements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XX.X.X.54630 Structures & Grounds RepaIr 300,000 147,000 153,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
x.x.x.x.54910 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
Total Maintenance $589,033 $288,626 $300,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
X.X.53-4.7031 Customer Service
XX.X.X.50700 Reallocated Labor Costs $17,129 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,129 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 100%
XX.X.X.53120 Office & Operating Supplies 4,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.x X.X.53121 Utility Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.x.X.X.5J510 Small Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.x.X.X.540DO Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.xx.x 54110 Prof. Services External 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
X.XX.X.54220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.x.X.X.543DD Travel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.x.xx.s4400 Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.S4520 Rents - Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.54910 Miscellaneous 4,000 0 0 0 0 3,243 757 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As all oth
Total Cust. Service $25,129 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,372 $4,757 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
X.X.534.8031 Operations
XX.XX.51001 Reallocated Labor Costs $485,448 $49,770 $180,258 $27,663 $18,712 $62,611 $0 $68,968 $13,986 $63,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Plant i
X.X.X.X.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 70,000 7,177 25,993 3,989 2,69B 9,02B 0 9,945 2,017 9,154 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X.53121 Utility Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X.53210 Vehicle Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X.53510 Small Tools & Equipment 50,000 5,126 1B,566 2,849 1,927 6,449 0 7,104 1,441 6,53B 0 0 0 o As Plant 1
X.x.x.X.53530 Computer Related Items 2.000 205 743 114 77 25B 0 2B4 5B 262 0 0 0 o As Plant i
X.x.x.X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 51,B47 5,316 19,252 2,954 1,998 6,687 0 7,366 1,494 6,7BO 0 0 0 o As Plant.
XX.X.X.54110 Professional ServIces - External 155,000 15,891 57,555 8,833 5,975 19,991 0 22,021 4,466 20,269 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X.54210 Telephone 8,000 B20 2,971 456 30B 1,032 0 1,137 230 1,046 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X.54220 Postage 500 51 1B6 2B 19 64 0 71 14 65 0 0 0 o As Planti
XXX.X.54300 Travel 2,500 256 92B 142 96 322 0 355 72 327 0 0 0 o As Plant i
X.xX.X.544DO Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X.54520 EqUipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant I
XX.X.X.54710 Natural Gas 2,000 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.54720 Electricity 275.000 275,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
X.xX.X.54730 Water/SewerlStormwater 400 41 149 23 15 52 0 57 12 52 0 0 0 o As Plant i
X.xX.X.54810 EqUipment Repair 1,000 103 371 57 39 129 0 142 29 131 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.X.X 54620 Repairs - Other Improvements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant i
X.X X.X.5491O Miscellaneous 20,000 2050 7,426 1140 771 2580 0 2 B41 576 2,615 0 0 0 o As Plant i
Total Operations $1,123,695 $363,807 $314,397 $48,248 $32,636 $109,203 $0 $120,291 $24,394 $110,719 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Water Resources $1,737,857 $652,433 $614,804 $48,248 $32,636 $129,575 $4,757 $120,291 $24,394 5110,719 $0 $0 $0 $0
30 of 38
Page 2 of 4
Classification
e of supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of supply
Ae
weA
Ae
WCMS
WCMS
weA
Ae
Ae
Ae
WCMS
er Cust Exp.
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
Com
Com
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 10
FUNCTIONALlZATlON AND CLASSIFICATION
OF EXPENSES
Customer Related
Weighted For:
Actual Customer Meters &
Fire
Fire
Direct Assignment
Actual
Budget Commodity Capacity Capacity Customer Customer Acctg. Services Protection Protection Revenue Related Navy ~II Other
Acet. No. Account Desc. CY 2004 (COM) (CAP) (CAP W/O N) (AC wo N) (ACl (WCAI (WCMSI (FP wo N) (FPI (RR) R-NOPSNS (DA-N) (DA-D) Basfs of
Wastewater Manager
534.9032 Other Operations - Biosolids
x.x.x,x.51001 Reallocated Labor Costs $69,206 569,208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Treat
X,X.x.X53110 OfflCe & Operating Supplies 58,000 58,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Treat
X.x.x.X.53121 Utility Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Treat
X.x.xX.53510 SmaltTools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Treat
X.xX.X.5.4000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Treat
x.x.x.x.54110 Prof. Services p External 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o h Treat
X.X.X,X.54720 Electricity 9,500 9,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
X.X.X.X.S810 Equipment Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Treat
x.x.xx.s-4910 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Treat
Total Wastewater Manager $136,708 $136,708 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
401.33. Utility Operations
X.X.534.5033 Maintenance
X.x.x.X.51001 Reallocated labor Cost $1,017,970 $104,367 $377.995 $56,006 $39,238 $131,294 $0 $144,624 $29,328 $133,116 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Plant i
x.x,x,x.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 100,000 10,252 37,132 5,698 3,855 12,898 0 14,207 2,881 13,077 0 0 0 o As Plant i
x.x.x.x.53119 Office Supplies -Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant I
x.x.X.X.53121 Utility Inventory 10,000 1,025 3,713 570 365 1,290 0 1.421 266 1,308 0 0 0 o As Plant I
XX.XX.53420 Purchases for Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant!
XXX.X.53510 Small Tools & Equipment 10,000 1,025 3,713 570 365 1,290 0 1,421 268 1,306 0 0 0 o As Plant I
XX.X.x.53530 Computer Related Items 5,000 513 1.857 285 193 645 0 710 144 654 0 0 0 o As Plant j
XX.X.X.540DO Reallocated Vehicle Costs 171,132 17,545 63,545 9,752 6,596 22,072 0 24,313 4,930 22,378 0 0 0 o As Plant I
X.X.X.X.54110 Professional Services - External 3,000 308 1,114 171 116 387 0 426 66 392 0 0 0 o As Plant I
x.x.x.x.54210 Telecommunications 1,500 154 557 65 56 193 0 213 43 196 0 0 0 o As Plant I
XX.X.x.S4220 Postage 500 51 186 26 19 64 0 71 14 65 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XXX.X.543CO Travel 2,000 205 743 114 77 256 0 264 56 262 0 0 0 o As Planti
x.x.x.x.5440c AdvertiSing 2,000 205 743 114 77 256 0 264 56 262 0 0 0 o As Plant I
XX.X.X.54520 Rents - EqUipment 4,500 461 1,671 256 173 560 0 639 130 566 0 0 0 o As Plant i
X,X.X.X.54710 Natural Gas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
x.x.x.x.54720 Electricity _ Olympus Drive Only 20,000 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
X.xXX.54740 Garbage 2,000 205 743 114 77 256 0 264 56 262 0 0 0 o As Plant i
XX.XX.54810 Equipment Repair 6.000 620 2,971 456 306 1,032 0 1,137 230 1,046 0 0 0 o As Plant I
XX.X X 54830 Structures & Grounds 5,000 513 1,857 265 193 645 0 710 144 654 0 0 0 o /J...s Plant I
X.X.X.X.54910 Miscellaneous 35,000 3,588 12,996 1,994 1,349 4,514 0 4,972 1,008 4,577 0 0 0 o As Plant i
x.x.x.x.54919 Miscellaneous -IFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant I
Total Utility Operations $1,397,602 $161,238 $511 ,535 $78,502 $53,100 $177,676 $0 $195,716 $39,689 $160,143 $0 $0 $0 $0
.401.39 Forestry
534.5039 Maintenance
X.x.XX.51001 Reallocated labor Costs $26,658 $13,062 $13,596 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Sourc
X.xX.X.53110 Office & Operating Supplies 16,000 7,840 8,160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XXX.X.53121 Utility Inventory 100 49 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
x.x.x.x.53s10 Small Tools & Equipment 500 245 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
X.x.X.X.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 32,127 15,742 16,385 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
X.x.X.X.54110 Professional Services 10,000 4,900 5,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XX.X.X.54220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n Sourc
x.x.x.x.54810 Rents - Equipment 7,500 3,675 3,825 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XX.X.X.54B30 Structures & Ground Repair 2,500 1,225 1,275 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
x.x.x.x.54910 Equipment Repair 100 49 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
Total Maintenance $95,485 $46,788 $46,697 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
31 of 38
Page3of4
Classification
ment Plant
ment Plant
ment Plant
ment Plant
ment Plant
ment Plant
Com
ment Plant
ment Plant
n Service
n Service
n Service
n SerVice
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
n Service
Com
Com
n Service
n Service
n ServIce
n Service
n Service
e of Supply
e at Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e 01 Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 10
FUNCTIONALlZATION AND CLASSIFICATION
OF EXPENSES
Customer Related
Weighted For:
Actual Customer Meters &
Fire
Fire
Direct Assignment
Actual
Budget Commodity Capacity Capacity Customer Customer Acctg. Services Protection Protection Revenue Related Navy~1l Other
Acet. No. Account Desc. CY 2004 (COM) {CAP' (CAP WIO N) lAC wo Nl lAC} (WCA) (WCM5) (FP wo NI (FP) {RR R.NOP5N5} fDA-Nl fDA-OJ B..I. of
.5'J4.90J9 Other Operations
x.x,X x 51001 Reallocated Labor Cost $274,683 134.595 140,088 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
x.x.x.x.51060 Overtime Pay (Cops Watershed Patrol) 40,000 19.600 20,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
x.x.x.x.s3110 Office & Operating Supplies 25,000 12.250 12,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
X.x.x.X,S3121 Utility Inventory 100 49 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
XX.X,X.53119 Operating Supplies - Interfund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
X.x.x.x.53210 Vehicle Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o /J.$. Bourc
XX.X.X.53510 Small Tools & EqUipment 2,000 980 1,020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Bourc
XX.X.X.53530 Computer Related Items 500 245 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Bourc
XXXX.54000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 51,257 25,116 26,141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XX.X.X.S"110 ProfessIOnal ServIces. External 65,500 32,095 33.405 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Bourc
XX.X.x.54210 Telecommunications 500 245 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XX.X.X.54220 Postage 500 245 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XXXX.5-4JOO Travel 1,000 490 510 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XX.X.X.S4400 Advertlsmg 100 49 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XXX.XS4520 Equipment 5,000 2,450 2,550 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Sourc
XX.X.X.54710 Natural Gas 1,500 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
XX.X.X.54720 Electricity 4,000 4,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
xx.x.x.s"y40 Garbage 1,000 490 510 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
XXX.X.54510 Equipment Repair 1,000 490 510 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
XX.X.X.54520 Other Improvements 1,000 490 510 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
xx.x.x.s4s10 Miscellaneous 20,000 9,800 10,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Soure
Total other Operations $494,640 $245,179 $249,461 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Forestry $590,125 $291,966 $298,159 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total O&M Expense $5,172,457 $1,347,474 $1,805,254 $185,182 $125,261 $444,006 $256,937 $489,767 $93,825 $424,950 $0 $0 $0 $0
Taxes/Transfer Payments
Intergovern Service & Tax 231.791 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 231,791 0 0 0 100%
Payment In-Lieu of Taxes 519,272 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 519,272 0 0 0 100%
ULlO Payment (12%) 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 100%
ULlD Payment (City Ownership) 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 0 0 0 100%
External Taxes & Assessments 4,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,000 0 0 0 100%
Total Taxes/Transfer Payments $995,063 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $995,063 $0 $0 $0
Depreciation Expense $1 31,tO.~6 $134,722 $487,935 $74,880 $50,650 $169,480 $0 $186,688 $37,858 $171,832 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Plant I
Net O&M plus Depreciation
$7,481,566 $1,482,196 $2,293,189
$613,486
$256,937
$676,455' $131,483
$596,783 $995,063
$0
$0
$0
$260,062
$175,911
32 of 38
Page 4 of 4
Classification
e of supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
Com
Com
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
e of Supply
RR
RR
RR
RR
RR
n Service
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 11
ALLOCA TION OF NET REVENUE REQUIREMENTS
Retail Retail Basis of
Classification Components Rev. Reqmts Inside Outside PSNS Wholesale Firelines Allocation
Commodity Related $1,482,196 $763,376 $294,725 $394,775 $29,319 $0 (COM)
Capacity Related $2,293,189 $1,195,881 $461,708 $435,721 $45,931 $153,948 (CAP)
Capacity Related with out Navy $260,062 $170,309 $65,753 $0 $6,541 $17,459 (CAP WIG N)
Customer Related
- Actual Customer $175,911 $109,916 $57,553 $0 $6,135 $2,307 (AC wo N)
- Actual Customer $613,486 $383,260 $200,680 $110 $21,392 $8,045 (AC)
- Weighted for:
Customer Accounting $256,937 $155,447 $81,394 $1,112 $17,353 $1 ,631 (WCA)
Meters & Services 676,455 $404,642 $211,876 $3,475 $56,463 $0 (WCMS)
Total Customer Related $1,722,790 $1,053,264 $551,504 $4,697 $101,342 $11,983
Fire Protection Related $131,483 $86,297 $45,186 $0 $0 $0 (FP wo N)
Fire Protection Related $596,783 $390,771 $204,613 $1,398 $0 $0 (FP)
Revenue Related - All $995,063 $450,294 $285,946 $216,845 $23,774 $18,204 (RR)
Revenue Related - No PSNS 0 0 0 0 0 0
$995,063 $450,294 $285,946 $216,845 $23,774 $18,204
Direct Assignment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (DA)
Total Net Revenue Requirements $7,481,566 $4,110,192 $1,909,435 $1,053,437 $206,908 $201,595
33 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
Water Fund
EXHIBIT 12
DEVELOPMENT OF THE RETURN
COMPONENT
Retail Retail
Total Inside Outside PSNS Wholesale Firelines Notes/Reference
Present Rate Revenues $4,609,085 $2,085,740 $1,324,486 $1,004,416 $110,122 $84,321 Exhibit 7; Revenue Related Allocation Factor
less: Expenses 7,481,566 $4,110,192 $1,909,435 $1,053,437 $206,908 $201,595 Exhibit 11; Allocation of Rev. Requirements
Net Income ($2,872,481) ($2,024,452) ($584,949) ($49,021) ($96,786) ($117,274) Difference of Lines Above
Rate Base $22,995,100 $12,352,740 $5,606,222 $3,773,779 $586,985 $675,374 Exhibit 1 0; Allocation of Rate Base
Proposed % Rate of Return [1] -5.56% -15.21% 9.00% 7.632% -15.21% -15.21% See Footnote [1]
Return Component ($1,278,432) (1,878,988) 504,560 288,015 (89,287) (102,732) Rate Base (x) Rate of Return
less: Credit for ULlD Amortization [2J (41,841) See Footnote; Negotiated item
Total Net Revenue Requirement $6,203,134 2,231,204 2,413,995 1,299,610 117,621 $98,863 Current Expenses (+) Return Component
Plus: Additional Taxes $249,400 $112,861 $71,669 $54,350 $5 959 $4,563 8.5% PilOT Retail & 5.029 Excise Tax-All on Add'l Rev.
Total Revised Revenue Requirements $6,452,534 $2,344,064 $2,485,664 $1,353,960 $123,580 $103,425 Total Rev, Req. (+) IntergovVlnterfund
$ Difference Over Base Rates ($1,843,449) ($258,324) ($1,161,178) ($349,544) ($13,458) ($19,104) Present Rates (-) Net Rev. Requirement
% Difference Over Base Rates 40.0% 12.4% 87.7% 34.8% 12.2% 22.7% $ Difference (I) Present Rate Revenues
[1J Rate of return for PSNS set based upon formula - See Rate of Return worksheet
[21 ULlD originalallocation to Navy = $52,301; 5 year amortization = $10,460/year. Credit to COSA is $52,301 - $10,460 = $41,841
34 of 38
CITY OF BREMERTON
EXHIBIT 13
AVERAGE UNIT COSTS
Retail Retail
Total Inside Outside PSNS Wholesale Firelines
Commodity Costs - $ / ccf $0.45 $0.45 $0.45 $0.45 $0.45 $0.00
Capacity Costs - $ / ccf $0.70 $0.71 $0.71 $0.50 $0.71 $0.00
Revenue/Direct/Other - $ / ccf $0.56 $0.56 $0.86 $0.31 $0.46 $0.00
Return Component -$0.39 -$1.11 $0.77 $0.33 -$1.38 $0.00
Total $/ccf $1.32 $0.61 $2.80 $1.59 $0.24 $0.00
Customer Costs - $ / Cust. / mo. $8.67 $8.37 $8.37 $130.46 $14.44 $39.18
Average Total Costs - $ / ccf $1.89 $1.32 $3.70 $1.54 $1.81 $0.00
Basic Data -
Annual Water Flow - ccf 3,278,756 1,688.659 651,960 873,280 64,857 0
Number of Customers 16,557 10,481 5,488 3 585
Equivalent Meters 220
35 of 38
Specifically, the proposed definitions for determining the rate of return for rate setting purposes is as follows:
"The Rate of Return allowed under this contract shall be the City's cost of debt plus a risk premium of2.5%
The rate of return will be reviewed in any cost of service study prepared by the City for its utilities throughout
throughout the life of this contract. The rate of return shall also meet the following tests
I) It shall be the greater of:
a. The City's cost of embedded debt plus 2.5%, or
b. The City's current cost of borrowing plus 2.5%
2) It shall always be greater than or equal to the rate of return for in-City retail customers (owner customers),
but less than or equal to the rate of return for outside city customers
3) It shall always be greater than or equal to zero
The City's "cost of borrowing" shall be the numerical (simple) average of at least three recent debt issue~
(within the previous 90 days ifpossible) in the marketplace for municipal entities with similar terms and
credit ratings. The City's "cost of embedded debt" shall be the weighted average of all non-subsidizee
outstanding debt for the combined utilities. These indexes shall be submitted to the Navy for review ane
comment prior to use in a future COSA prepared by the City."
36 of 38
UTILITY SYSTEM NONSUBSIDIZED REVENUE BONDS AND LOANS
Water Utility (401) Wastewater Utility (451) Stormwater Utility (481) Combined Systems
Matu rity Interest Outstanding Debt Weighted Debt Weighted Debt Weighted Debt Weighted
Date Rate 12/31/2005 .E!!lli!. A!:!:!2!!.!!! Ave. % Amount Ave. % Amount Ave. % A!:!:!2!!.!!! Ave. %
1994 Water/Sewer Revenue 09/01/06 5.1 $ 2,515,000 451 $ 2,515,000 2.481 $ 2,515,000 2.298
1994 Water/Sewer Revenue 09/01/07 5.5 2,655,000 451 2,655,000 2.824 2,655,000 2.616
2005 Water/Sewer Revenue 8/31/05 5.1 406,587 401 $ 406,587 5.025 406,587 0.371
2002 Lease Purchase Pitney Bowes CC 4/30/07 7.3 6,056 401 6,056 0.107 6,056 0.008
Total Weighted Average Interest Cost $ 5,582,643 $ 412,643 5.132 % $ 5,170,000 5.305 % $ 0.000 % $ 5,582,643 5.293 %
Plus: Risk Premium of 2.5% 2.500 % 2.500 % 2.500 % 2.500 %
Test 1 Total Rate of Return - Current Debt + Risk Premium 7.632 % 7.805 % 2.500 % 7.793 %
Current Cost of Borrowing 4.560 % 4.560 % 4.560 % 4.560 %
Plus: Risk Premium of 2.5% 2.500 % 2.500 % 2.500 % 2.500 %
Test 2 Total Rate of Return. Cost of Borrowing + Risk Premium 7.060 % 7.060 % 7.060 % 7.060 %
Rate of Return to Be Used - Greater of Test 1 or Test 2 7.632 % 7.805 % 7.060 % 7.793 %
37 of 38
WATER ESCALATION 2004 TO 2008
Following
Revenue % What City % Navy % Navy as a
Requir. Change Adopted Change Adjustments Change % of Total
Old Revenue $4,609,085 $4,609,085 $1,004,416
1st (2004) Adjustment [1] $6,452,534 40.0% $5,991,811 30.0% $1,353,960 34.8% 20.98%
2nd (2006) Adjustment $6.890,582 6.8% = $6,890,582 15.0% $1,445,877 6.8% 20.98%
3rd (2007) Adjustment $7,179,986 4.2% $7,179,987 4.2% $1,506,604 4.2% 20.98%
4th (2008) Adjustment $7,431,286 3.5% $7,431,286 3.5% $1,559,335 3.5% 20.98%
[1] - The revenue requirement for 2004 is adjusted from the original 2004 study to reflect the additional
PILOT payments included within revised study.
Note: Navy amount of $1 ,358,360 represents the final negotiated amount.
Water Rate Design - 2008 Rates
Target Rev. from C-O-S $1,559,335
Fixed Costs (30%)
Variable Costs (70%)
$468,000
$1,091,335
$1,559,335
12 Mths =
873,280 cd =
$39,000 /Month
$1.25 /CCF
38 of 38
:^ y~ '""", .... .No ; ~ ^', , .... / ......... ~ ~ '^ ,y. ^~ ~7, y ~
"sewer Technical Appendices> 0,' 0" "
/ / , , ....', ,,(" ....':1::'/ N:..::......' -; iX-;" .... J. )! ^ '" .... .<:\..;::: " ,/
CITY OF BREMERTON
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 1
ESCALATION FACTORS
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Escalation Factors
Revenues
Other Revenues 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Expenses
Power 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
Labor -68% @ 3%, Other -12%@3%, 20%@26%-medical 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.60% 7.60%
Materials & Supplies 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Equipment 1.00% 1.00'/0 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Miscellaneous 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00%
Depreciation 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00%
New Debt Service
Long Term Debt
Term in Years 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Rate 5.50% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00%
Public Works Trust Fund Loans
Term in Years 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Rate 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50% 1.50%
Centennial Clean Water Fund Loan
Term in Years 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Rate 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Interest Rates
Interest Income 2.00% 2.00% 3.00% 3.00% 4.00% 4.00% 4.00%
Growth 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
1 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 1 of7
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT Z
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
Z004 Z005 Z006 Z007 Z008 Z009 Z010 ZOll Notes:
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Rate Revenues
451.35.343.5001 Wastewater Sales Retail $7,280,964 $7,353,774 $7,427,311 $7,501,584 $7,576,600 $7,652,366 $7,728,890 $7,806,179 Calc 2004, Incr by Growth
Wastewater Sales Navy 1,796,128 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616 No Growth
Total Rate Revenues $9,077,092 $9,164,390 $9,237,927 $9,312,200 $9,387,216 $9,462,982 $9,539,506 $9,616,795
Miscellaneous Revenues
451.35.341.5000 Sales of Maps & Publication $1,000 $1,010 $1,020 $1,030 $1,041 $1,051 $1,062 . $1,072 As Other Revenue
451.35.342.4001 Sanitary Sewer 15,000 15,150 15,302 15,455 15,609 15,765 15,923 16,082 As Other Revenue
451.35.342.4002 Storm Detention 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Other Revenue
451.35.343.5004 Septage Dump Charges 3.000 3,030 3,060 3,091 3,122 3,153 3,185 3,216 As Other Revenue
451.35.343.5005 Lechate Hauling & Dumping 50.000 50,500 51,D05 51,515 52,030 52,551 53,076 53,607 As Other Revenue
451.35.343.5006 Sewer Connectionl Other Charges 10,DOO 100 1 0 0 0 0 0 As Growth
451.35.343.8300 Plan checking Fees 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Other Revenue
451.35.361.1100 Investment Interest 10,000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Other Revenue
451.35.369 4000 Judgements and Settlements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flat
451.35.313,1000 Retail Sales and Use Tax 50,000 50,500 51,005 51,515 52,030 52,551 53,076 53,607 As Growth
Interfund Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 One time 2004
Discretionary ReserVe 186,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 One time 2004
Total Misc, Revenues $325,500 $130,895 $132,104 $133,424 $134,758 $136,106 $137,467 $138,842
Total Revenues $9,402,592 $9,295,285 $9,370,031 $9,445,624 $9,521,975 $9,599,088 $9,676,973 $9,755,636
APPLICATIONS OF FUNDS
451,31 Water Resources
X.X.535.5031 Maintenance
XXX.51.DOi Reallocated Labor Costs SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Labor
X.X.X.53121 Office & Operating Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat & Supplies
XXX.53.SiD Utility Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat & Supplies
XXX.53.S3D Small Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
XXX.54810 Computer Related Items 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.XXS4910 Equipment Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
x X.X 54.000 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc,
X.X.X.54.220 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X,X.54.520 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat & Supplies
X.X.X.54.a10 Equipment Rental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X.X.54910 Equipment Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
Total Maintenance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
X.X.535.7031
X X.X.51.001 Customer Se/Vice
X.X.X.53.120 Reallocated Labor Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Labor
X,X,X,54,000 Office & Operating Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat & Supplies
X.x.X.54.110 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X.X.54.220 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc,
X.X.X.54.300 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat & Supplies
x X.X.54.910 Travel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mise,
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc,
Total Customer Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
2 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 2 017
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Notes:
XXX.51.aOi Operations
X,XXS3.110 Reallocated Labor Costs $93.917 $101,055 $108,735 $116,999 $125,891 $135,458 $145,753 $156,830 As Labor
X,X,X.53.121 Operating Supplies 10.000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Mat & Supplies
XXX.53.SiD Utility InventOlY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat & Supplies
x X.X.53.530 Small Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X.x.S4.000 Computer Related Items 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X.X.54.110 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 4,~12 4,254 4,297 4,340 4,383 4,427 4,471 4,516 As Equipment
X.X.X.54.210 Professional Services :?'o,OOfJ 25,250 25,503 25,758 26,015 26,275 26,538 26,803 As Misc.
X X.X.54.220 Telecommunications 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X X.X.54 300 Postage 1.000 1,010 1,020 1,030 . 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Mat & Supplies
X.x.X.54.400 Travel 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Misc.
X.X.X.54.910 Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
Miscellaneous 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Misc.
Total Operations $135,629 $143,184 $151,285 $159,975 $169,296 $179,298 $190,031 $201,551
Total Water Resource Manager $135,629 $143,184 $151,285 $159,975 $169,296 $179,298 $190,031 $201,551
451.32
X.X 535.5032 Wastewater Manager
XXX.51.aQi Maintenance
X.X.X.53.110 Reallocated Labor Costs 5558,841 $601,313 $647,013 $696,186 $749,096 $806,027 $867,285 $933,199 As Labor
X.X.X.53.210 Office & Operating Supplies 150.000 151,500 153,015 154,545 156,091 157,652 159,228 160,820 As Mat & Supplies
xxx 53.510 Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.53.530 Small Tools & Equipment dO.OOO 40,400 40,804 41,212 41,624 42,040 42,461 42,885 As Equipment
X,X,X.54.000 Computer Related Items 20.000 20,200 20,402 20,606 20,812 21,020 21,230 21 ,443 As Equipment
X.X.X.54,110 Reallocaled Vehicle Costs 17,939 18,118 18,300 18,483 18,667 18,854 19,043 19,233 As Equipment
X.X X.54.30G Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X,X.54.520 Travel 1,500 1,515 1,530 1,545 1,561 1,577 1,592 1,608 As Misc.
X.X.X.54.740 Equipment 9,000 9,090 9,181 9,273 9,365 9,459 9,554 9,649 As Equipment
X,X.X.54.810 Garbage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
XXX.54.830 Equipment Repair 100.000 101,000 102,010 103,030 104,060 105,101 106,152 107,214 As Equipment
X X.X.54.919 Structures & Grounds Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
Miscellaneous 3,000 3,030 3,060 3,091 3,122 3,153 3,185 3,216 As Misc.
Total Maintenance $900,280 $946,166 $995,315 $1,047,971 $1,104,399 $1,164,883 $1,229,729 $1,299,268
3 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 3 of7
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Notes:
X.X,X.51.001 Operations
X.x.X.53.110 Reallocated Labor Costs $626,276 $673,873 $725,087 $780,194 $839,489 $903,290 $971,940 $1,045,807 As Labor
XXX.53,2iD Office & Operating Supplies 181.000 182,810 184,638 186,484 188,349 190,233 192,135 194,056 As Mat & Supplies
X.X.X.53.510 Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
x X,X.S3.530 Small Tools & Equipment 11.000 11,110 11,221 11,333 11,447 11,561 11,677 11,793 As Equipment
x X.X.54.00Q Computer Related Items 70,000 70,700 71,407 72,121 72,842 73,571 74,306 75,049 As Equipment
X.X.X.54.110 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 21,Z29 21,441 21,656 21,872 22,091 22,312 22,535 22,760 As Equipment
X.X X.54.210 Professional Services 100.000 50.000 50,500 51,005 51,515 52,030 52,551 53,076 As Misc.
X.X X.54.220 Telecommunications 48,000 48,480 48,965 49,454 49,949 50,448 50,953 51,462 As Misc.
X.XXS4.300 Postage 2.600 2,626 2,652 2,679 2,706 2,733 2,760 2,788 As Mat & Supplies
X.x.x.54.400 Travel 5.000 5,060 5,121 6,182 6,244 6,306 6,369 6,433 As Mise,
X.X.X.54.520 Advertising 2,000 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Misc.
X.X,X.54.710 Rents - Equipment 3,500 3,535 3,570 3,606 3,642 3,679 3,715 3,752 As Misc.
X.X.X.54.720 Natural Gas 8,000 8,080 8,161 8,242 8,325 8,408 8,492 8,577 As Misc.
XXX. 54. 730 Electricity 475,000 489,250 503,928 519,045 534,617 550,655 567,175 584,190 As Power
X.X.X.54.740 WaterlSewerlS tormwater 65,000 65,650 66,307 66,970 67,639 68,316 68,999 69,689 As Misc.
X X X.54.810 Garbage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.54.910 Equipment Repair 22,782 23,010 23,240 23,472 23,707 23,944 24,184 24,425 As Equipment
Miscellaneous 55,000 55,550 56,106 56,667 57,233 57,806 58,384 58,967 As Misc.
TotalOperations $1,697,387 $1,714,195 $1,785,598 $1,861,388 $1,941,876 $2,027,393 $2,118,297 $2,214,972
Total Wastewater Manager $2,597,667 $2,660,361 $2,780,912 $2,909,359 $3,046,274 $3,192,276 $3,348,027 $3,514,239
451.32
X.X.535.5033 Utility Operations
X.X.X.51.001 Maintenance
XXX53.110 Reallocated Labor Costs 5448,929 $483,048 $519,759 $559,261 $601,765 $647,499 $696,709 $749,659 As Labor
X.X X.53.121 Operating Supplies 30,000 30,300 30,603 30,909 31,218 31,530 31,846 32,164 As Mat & Supplies
x x X.53 510 Utility Inventory 7,000 7,070 7,141 7,212 7,284 7,357 7,431 7,505 As Mat & Suppiies
X.X.x.S3.530 Small Toois & Equipment 'Ill.OOO 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Equipment
X.X.X.54.000 Computer Related Items 4.000 4,040 4,080 4,121 4,162 4,204 4,246 4,289 As Equipment
X.x.X.54.110 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 107.106 108,177 1 09,259 110,351 111,455 112,569 113,695 114,832 As Equipment
X.X.X.54.210 Professional Services 2.000 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Misc., B/F main cleaning
X.X.X.54.220 Telecommunications '100 707 714 721 728 736 743 750 As Misc.
X X X 54.300 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat & Supplies
X.X.X.54.520 Travel 1.000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 1,051 1,062 1,072 As Misc.
X.XX54 520 Equipment 2.000 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Equipment
XXX.54.740 Rents - Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X.X.54.810 Garbage 5,000 6,060 6,121 6,182 6,244 6,306 6,369 6,433 As Misc.
X.X.X.54.820 Equipment Repair 5,000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255 5,308 5,361 As Equipment
XXX.54.910 Repairs 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 From City, Beachmain cleaning
Miscellaneous 10.000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Misc.
Total Maintenance $633,735 $769,702 $808,280 $749,667 $794,075 $841,732 $992,884 $1,047,796
XXS3S.7033
X.XX51.001 Customer Service
x X'x'S4.000 Reallocated Labor Costs 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Labor
Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
Total Cust. Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Utility Operations $633,735 $769,702 $808,280 $749,667 $794,075 $841,732 $992,884 $1,047,796
4 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 40f7
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES ANO APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Notes:
xx 535.1035 Wastewater Administration
X.X.X.51.001 Administration
X.X X.53.110 Reallocated Labor Costs 5105.501 $113,519 $122,147 $131,430 $141,418 $152,166 $163,731 $176,174 As Labor
X.X.X.53.510 Office & Operating Supplies 1,200 1,212 1,224 1,236 1,249 1,261 1,274 1,287 As Mat & Supplies
X,X.X.53.530 Small Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
XX.X.54.000 Computer Related Items 500 505 510 515 520 526 531 536 As Equipment
x X.X.54.110 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Equipment
X.X.X.54.119 Professional Services 10.000 10,100 10,201 10,303 10,406 10,510 10,615 10,721 As Misc.
X.x.X.54.210 IFD Professional Services 276,268 279,031 281,821 284,639 287,486 290,360 293,264 296,197 As Misc. - General Fund
X,X.X.54.220 Telecommunications 8,000 8,080 8,161 8,242 8,325 8,408 8,492 8,577 As Misc.
X.X.X.54.300 Postage 4,500 4,545 4,590 4,636 4,683 4,730 4,777 4,825 As Mat & Supplies
X.X.X.54.400 Travel 1,500 1,515 1,530 1,545 1,561 1,577 1,592 1,608 As Misc.
X.X,X.54.520 Advertising 250 253 255 256 260 263 265 268 As Misc.
X.X.x.54.510 Equipment Rental 2.554 2,580 2,605 2,631 2,658 2,684 2,711 2,738 As Equipment
X.X.X.54619 Rents - Land & Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.54620 IFD Insurance Premiums 201,818 203,836 205,875 207,933 210,013 212,113 214,234 216,376 As Misc. - Risk Management
X.X.X.54.740 Claim Payments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.54.810 Garbage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.54.910 Equipment Repair 650 657 663 670 676 683 690 697 As Equipment
Miscellaneous 5.000 5,050 5,101 5,152 5,203 5,255 5,308 5,361 As Misc.
Total Administration $617,741 $630,881 $644,683 $659,191 $674,457 $690,535 $707,484 $725,365
XX535.7035
X,X.X.51.0Q1 Customer Service
X.XXS3.110 Reallocated Labor Costs $133.505 $143,651 $154,569 $166,316 $178,956 $192,557 $207,191 $222,938 As Labor
X.XXS4.000 Office & Operating Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat & Suppiies
XXX.54.110 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 4.091 4,132 4,173 4,215 4,257 4,300 4,343 4,386 As Equipment
XXX.54.119 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
XXX.54.220 IFD Professional Serivces 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X.X.54.30D Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Mat & Supplies
x X.X.54 910 Travel 825 833 842 850 858 867 876 885 As Misc.
Miscel1aneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
Total Customer Service $138,421 $148,617 $159,584 $171,381 $184,072 $197,724 $212,410 $228,208
Total Wastewater Administration $756,162 $779,498 $804,266 $830,572 $858,529 $888,259 $919,893 $953,573
5 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 5 017
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget ProJected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Notes:
X.X.535 8037 Wastewater Engineering
X.X.X.51.001 Operations
X.X.X.53110 Reallocated Labor Costs $226.545 $243,762 $262,286 $282,222 $303,671 $326,750 $351,583 $378,304 As Labor
X.X.x.53510 Office & Operating Supplies 3,000 3,030 3,060 3,091 3,122 3,153 3,185 3,216 As Mat & Supplies
X.X.X.54530 Small Tools & Equipment 1,900 1,919 1,938 1,958 1,977 1,997 2,017 2,037 As Equipment
X.X.X.54.000 Computer Related Items 7,000 7,070 7,141 7,212 7,284 7,357 7,431 7,505 As Equipment
X.X.X.54110 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 8.016 8,096 8,177 8,259 8,341 8,425 8,509 8,594 As Equipment
X.X.X.54220 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As Misc.
X.X X.54300 Postage 125 126 128 129 130 131 133 134 As Mat & Supplies
X.X X.54400 Travel 2,000 2,020 2,040 2,061 2,081 2,102 2,123 2,144 As Misc.
X.X.x.54520 Advertising 2,500 2,525 2,550 2,576 2,602 2,628 2,654 2,680 As Misc.
X.X.X.54810 Rents. Equipment 1,800 1,818 1,836 1,855 1,873 1,892 1,911 1,930 As Equipment
XXX.54910 Equipment Repair 1.700 1,717 1,734 1,752 1,769 1,787 1,805 1,823 As Misc.
Miscellaneous 4.000 4,040 4,080 4,121 4,162 4,204 4,246 4,289 As Misc.
Total Engineering Operations $258,586 $276,124 $294,973 $315,234 $337,013 $360,426 $385,595 $412,656
TOTAL O&M EXPENSES $4,381,779 $4,628,869 $4,839,717 $4,964,806 $5,205,187 $5,461,990 $5,836,431 $6,129,815
X.X.X.551QO Taxes/Transfer Payments
X.x.X.55409 Intergovernmental Service $239,246 $238,581 $240,497 $242,435 $244,392 $246,368 $248,364 $250,381 3.852% Treat, 1.5% Coli
Payment in Lieu of Taxes 771,553 778,973 785,224 791,537 797,913 804,353 810,858 817,428 8.5% on Rate Retail Revenue
Total TaxesfTransler Payments $1,010,799 $1,017,554 $1,025,721 $1,033,972 $1,042,305 $1,050,722 $1,059,222 $1,067,808
TOTAL O&M EXPENSES (incl. taxes) $5,392,578 $5,646,422 $5,865,438 $5,998,778 $6,247,492 $6,512,712 $6,895,653 $7,197,623
Debt Service
Revenue Bonds
Existing 1994 Revenue Bond $2.803720 $2.803.410 $2,799,350 52,801.025 50 $0 $0 $0 Debt Scheduie
New Revenue Bonds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal Revenue Bonds $2,803,720 $2,803,410 $2,799,350 $2,801,025 $0 $0 $0 $0
Public Works Trust Fund Loans
Existing Warren Avenue CSO $177.163 $175,566 $173,970 5172,374 $170.778 $169.182 $167,586 $165,990 Debt Schedule
Existing WNTP Odor Control 207,462. 205,610 203,767 201,905 200,053 198,200 1>)6,348 194,495 Debt Schedule
Existing Callow CSO I 171.1:13 169.61H 168,104 166,590 165,075 163,561 162,046 160,532 Debt Schedule
EXisting Callow CSO II "0.187 39 835 39,482 39, t30 38,777 38,425 38,072 37,719 Debt Schedule
Existing CSO Reduction Design 56,600 56.111 55,623 S5,1~16 54,MB 54,160 53.672. 53,184 Debt Schedule
EXIsting Multibasin CSO 174,'i'11 173.218 171,725 170,231 168.'138 16'1.244 16&.752 164,258 Estimated Repmt Sched.
Existing Callow CSO III & V 261,412 259,178 256,944 254,709 252.475 250.241 248,007 245,772 Estimated Repmt Sched.
Existing East Bremerton 172.583 171,792 171,000 170,208 169,~17 168,625 167,833 i67,04:1. Estimated Repmt Sched.
Existing Naval Ave Force Main 21.500 2:1..000 21,500 21,000 20,500 20,000 19,500 19,000 Estimated Repmt Sched.
New Anderson Cove BaSin 12 24.225 26.006 25,887 25,768 25,650 25,531 25,412 25,294 Need Updated Schedule
New Pacific Avenue CSO Reduction () ,; !) ;"<% gp~; :lHa mJ9 2HB,8P~l Calculated (2,500K, 20,1.5%)
New PWfF Loans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal PWfF Loans $1,306,976 $1,298,935 $1,287,992 $1,277,051 $1,266,111 $1,544,068 $1,533,127 $1,522,185
6 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 6 017
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Notes:
Other Loans
Existing SRF Callow Design $37.2"10 537.2"10 537,270 $37,2'70 $3'7.270 $3'7,2'70 $3l,2l0 $3l,2"10 Debt Schedule
Existing SRF Callow Priority I 209,644 209.644 :7.09,644 2.00,6~4 2.00 ,6~~ 2.00,644 209.644 209,644 Debt Schedule
Existing SRF Callow Priority II 103,429 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Debt Schedule, ends 2004
Existing SRF Anderson Cove CSO 56,949 58,948 56,948 56,948 56,948 56.948 56,948 56,948 Debt Schedule
Existing SRF Callow Final Priorities :l4,538 34,538 34,538 :l4,538 34,538 34.538 34,538 3~,5:18 Debt Schedule
Existing SRF CSO Plan Update 14.934 'i4.934 14,934 '14,934 14,934 14,034 14,934 14,034 Debt Schedule
Existing SRF Anderson Cove Refinance 3"1.981 37.981 37,081 37,981 3'7,981 3'7,981 37,981 3'1,081 Debt Schedule
Existing SRF Anderson Cove Basin 12 0 8,06'1 17 .9~~4 17.934 Il,934 Il,93~ 17.t~~~4 H,93~ Estimated Repmt Sched.
Existing SRF Low Interest Loan Program 0 0 14,045 14,945 14.945 14.945 14,945 14,945 Estimated Repmt Sched.
Existing SRF Trenton Cherry CSO 0 59,'i'84 59,784 59,'l84 59,784 59.784 59.'184 59;784 Estimated Repmt Sched.
Existing SRF Trenton Pump Station ?9,800 59,782 59,l82 59,'182 59,782 59,782 59,782 59.782. Estimated Repmt Sched.
Existing SRF Tracy ton Beach CSO 20,715 41.429 41,429 41 ,429 41,429 41 ,429 41,429 41,429 Estimated Repmt Sched.
Existing SRF Anderson Cove Inflo/lnfil 0 0 6.282 12,564 12,564 12,564 12.564 12,564 Estimated Repmt Sched.
Existing SRF Pacific Ave CSO 0 14945 14,B45 14,945 14.9~5 '14.945 14,9~5 14,D45 Estimated Repmt Sched.
New SRF Pacific Ave CSO Storage 0 28,902 59,805 59,805 09,805 59.805 59,805 59,805 Estimated Repmt Sched.
New SRF CherryfTrenton Basins Final CSO Reduct. 0 58 .;>~G 50,716 582.t\G :'8.746 :/3.246 DG,240 ('i~./.N~ Calculated ($1mil, 20, 1.5%)
New Interfund Loan Fm Equipment Rental Fund 9,258 0 n 0 0 0 lJ 0 End in 2004
New Interfund Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Other Loans 0 0 18,406 30,665 39,665 39,665 39.665 39,665 Calculated, 20 years, 1.5%
Subtotal Other Loans $554,608 $664,370 $742,872 $770,414 $770,414 $770,414 $770,414 $770,414
Total Debt SelVice $4,665,304 $4,766,715 $4,830,214 $4,848,490 $2,036,525 $2,314,482 $2,303,541 $2,292,599
Net Revenue Available for Capital Funding ($655,290) ($1,117,853) ($1,325,621) ($1,401,644) $1,237,957 $771,894 $477, 779 $265,414
Net Capital Projects Funded from Rates $600,000 $725,000 $750,000 $750,000 $2,200,000 $2,266,000 $2,333,980 $2,403,999 From Capital Funding AnalY5is
To Capital Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000 $900,000 $800,000 $500,000
TOTAL REVENUE REQUIREMENTS $10,657,882 $11,138,137 $11,445,653 $11,597,268 $11,784,017 $11,993,194 $12,333,174 $12,394,222
Balance/(Deficiency) of Funds ($1,255,290) ($1,842,853) ($2,075,621) ($2,151,644) ($2,262,043) ($2,394,106) ($2,656,201) ($2,638,585)
Increase/(Decrease) as a % of Rates 13.8% 20.1% 22.5% 23.1% 24.1% 25.3% 27.8% 27.4%
Plus: Additional Taxes w/Rate Increase ($176,905) ($259,708) ($292,512) ($303,225) ($318,784) ($337,395) ($374,331 ) ($371,849)
Total Balance/(Deficiency) of Funds ($1,432,195) ($2,102,561) ($2,368,133) ($2,454,869) ($2,580,827) ($2,731,501) ($3,030,532) ($3,010,434)
Rate Adjustment Required 15.8% 22.9% 25.6% 26.4% 27.5% 28.9% 31.8% 31.3%
7 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2
SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS OF
FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Wastewater Utility - All Debt
Before Rate Increase 1.05 0.95 0.91 0.89 2.05
After Rate Increase 1.35 1.39 1.40 1.40 3.32
Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Wastewater Utility - Revenue Bond Only
Before Rate Increase 1.74 1.62 1.57 1.55 0.00
After Rate Increase 2.25 2.37 2.41 2.43 0.00
Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Wastewater Utility - Other Debt
Before Rate Increase 2.62 2.31 2.16 2.12 2.05
After Rate Increase 3.39 3.38 3.33 3.32 3.32
Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Combined Utility
Before Rate Increase 1.28 1.07 0.99 0.90 1.71
After Rate Increase 1.54 1.97 2.17 2.22 4.75
Debt service coverage = 1.30
Gross revenue of the system = alf the earnings and revenue received by the system from any source including sale of forest products,
except; general ad valorem taxes, grants, refunded bond escrow aeet earnings, gifts to system for capital purposes, proceeds from sale
of city property, proceeds from city or system obligations
Operating and Maintenance expenses; all reasonable expenses incurred by the City Including insurance premIUms, state imposed taxes
payment to another agency for treatment or sewage disposal, excluding depreciation, city imposed utility taxes or PILOT.
8 of 31
Page 70f7
2009 2010 2011 Notes:
1.72 1.60 1.52
2.90 2.92 2.83
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
1.72 1.60 1.52
2.90 2.92 2.83
1.31 1.08 0.86
4.23 4.21 4.20
City of Bremerton - Wastewater Department
SUMMARY OF SOURCES AND
APPLICATIONS OF FUNDS
Budget Projected
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Wastewater Retail Sales $7,280,964 $7,353,774 $7,427,311 $7,501,584 $7,576,600 $7,652,366 $7,728,890 $7,806,179
PSNS Sales 1,796,128 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616 1,810,616
Other Revenues 325,500 130,895 132,104 133,424 134,758 136,106 137,467 138,842
$9,402,592 $9,295,285 $9,370,031 $9,445,624 $9,521,975 $9,599,088 $9,676,973 $9,755,636
Total Sources of Funds
APPLICATIONS OF FUNDS
O&M Expenses $5,392,578 $5,646,422 $5,865,438 $5,998,778 $6,247,492 $6,512,712 $6,895,653 $7,197,623
Capital Oullays from Rates 600,000 725,000 750,000 750,000 2,200,000 2,266,000 2,333,980 2,403,999
Debt Service 4,665,304 4,766,715 4,830,214 4,848,490 2,036,525 2,314,482 2,303,541 2,292,599
To Capital Reserves 0 0 0 0 1,300,000 900,000 800,000 500,000
TOTAL NET REVENUE REQUIREMENT $10,657,882 $11,138,137 $11,445,653 $11,597,268 $11,784,017 $11,993,194 $12,333,174 $12,394,222
BALANCE/OEFICIENCY OF FUNDS ($1,255,290) ($1,842,853) ($2,075,621) ($2,151,644) ($2,262,043) ($2,394,106) ($2,656,201) ($2,638,585)
Plus: Add'l Taxes w/Rate Increase ($176,905) ($259,708) ($292,512) ($303,225) ($318,784) ($337,395) ($374,331) ($371,849)
TOTAL BALANCE OF FUNDS ($1,432,195) ($2,102,561) ($2,368,133) ($2,454,869) ($2,580,827) ($2,731,501) ($3,030,532) ($3,010,434)
RATE ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED 15.8% 22.9% 25.6% 26.4% 27.5% 28.9% 31.8% 31.3%
PROPOSED RATE ADJUSTMENT 10.0% 8.0% G.O% 3.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
ADDITiONAL REVENUE WITH RATE ADJUSTMENT $453,855 $1,722,905 $2,395,210 $2,766,267 $2,910,309 $3,057,767 $3,208,714 $3,363,226
BALANCE/DEFICIENCY OF FUNDS ($978,340) ($379,656) $27,077 $311,398 $329,483 $326,266 $178,181 $352,792
ADDITIONAL RATE ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED 10.8% 3.5% .0.2% -2.6% -2.7% -2.6% -1.4% -2.7%
Present Residential Bill (10 CCF + Base Charge) $48.64 $53.50 $57.78 $61.25 $63.09 $63.72 $64.36 $65.00
Rate Impact with Increase $4.86 $4,28 $3.47 $1.84 $0.63 $0,64 $0.64 $0,65
Total Monthly Rate with Increase $53,50 $57,78 $61.25 $63.09 $63.72 $64.36 $65.00 $65.65
Working Capital
Beginning Cash ($793,391 ) $0 ($379,656) ($352,579) ($41,181) $288,302 $614,568 $792,749
Plus: Additional Balance 0 0 27,077 311,398 329,483 326,266 178,181 352,792
Less: Deficiency of Funds (978,340) (379,656) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Less: Transfer to Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ending Working Capital ($1,771,731) ($379,656) ($352,579) ($41,181) $288,302 $614,568 $792,749 $1,145,541
Target 15% of Operations Budget $647,109 $846,963 $879,816 $899,817 $937,124 $976,907 $1,034,348 $1,079,643
Capital Fund
Ending Fund Balance $687,000 $453,000 $0 $0 $2,688,000 $3,584,000 $1,847,980 $1,881,979
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL AND CAPITAL FUN[ ($1,084,731) $73,344 ($352,579) ($41,181) $2,976,302 $4,198,568 $2,640,729 $3,027,520
Debt Service Coverage Ratio - Wastewater Utility - All Debt
Before Rate Increase 1.05 0.95 0.91 0.89 2.05 1.72 1.60 1,52
After Rate increase 1.14 1.31 1.40 1.47 3.48 3.05 3.00 2,98
9 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT Page 1 of 5
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Total Capital Projects
Sewer Main Replacement Program $100,000 $150,000 $220,000 $220,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $2,090,000
PwrF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $100,000 $150,000 $220,000 $220,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $2,090,000
VVWTP & Pump Station Improvements 150,000 165,000 215,000 215,000 400,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 $2,495,000
PwrF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $150,000 $165,000 $215,000 $215,000 $400,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,495,000
Fuel Tank Replacements (this rolled up to VVWTP Improv) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0
PwrF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Automatic Power Switch Gear (this roll up to WlNTP Improv) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0
PwrF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Emergency Power Supply (this rolled up into WlNTP improv) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0
PwrF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Washington Street - Beachmain Abandonment 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 $5,000,000
PwrF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 $5,000,000
KL-1, 2 &* PB-1 Pump Station Upgrade 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $100,000
PwrF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
10 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
WASTEWA TER DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 5
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Total Capital Projects
New Roof on Control Building 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $15,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
WNT Solids Management 0 0 300,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 $450,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $450,000
Headworks Mechanical Bar Screen 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $100,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
WNTP Upgrade/frontage improvements 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 $150,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Class A Water Filter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Methane Boiler 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $100,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
11 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT Page 3 of 5
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Total Capital Projects
Generator 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $750,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 750,000
Total Funding $0 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Outfall 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 0 0 $600,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $600,000
Digester 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 $2,000,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
Water Reuse 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $100,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Anderson Cove Basin CSS Project (OF-12) 0 380,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $380,000
PWTF Loan 0 380,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 380,000
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $380,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $380,000
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Trenton & Cherry Ave Basin CSO Reduc. (OF 7&3) 1,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $1,600,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 1,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,250,000
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $1,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000
Internally Funded $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Pacific Avenue CSO Project (OF-16) 750,000 200,000 3,000,000 1,400,000 2,800,000 0 0 0 $8,150,000
PWTF Loan 992,000 0 570,000 690,000 2,708,000 0 0 0 4,960,000
SRF Loan 450,000 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,250,000
Grant 210,000 100,000 1,630,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,940,000
Total Funding $1,652,000 $100,000 $3,000,000 $690,000 $2,708,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,150,000
Internally Funded ($902,000) $100,000 $0 $710,000 $92,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
12 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT Page 4 of 5
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Total Capital Projects
WW Collection and Trans System Improve - Oyster Bay 0 0 0 0 0 550,000 0 0 $550,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $550,000 $0 $0 $550,000
Anderson Cove 1&1 Study 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $200,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 180,000 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $180,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000
Internally Funded $20,000 ($20,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Tracy ton PS (EB-6) - Construction/Improvement 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $125,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 100,000 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,000
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $100,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000
Internally Funded $25,000 ($25,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Campbell Way Beach Access @ Main Street 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $50,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
WWTP Capacity Upgrades 200,000 2,000,000 964,000 0 0 0 0 0 $3,164,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 1,746,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,746,000
Total Funding $0 $1,746,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,746,000
Internally Funded $200,000 $254,000 $964,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,418,000
Gravity Belt Thickner 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 $200,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000
13 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 2B
CAPITAL AND FUNDING DETAIL
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Total Capital Projects
Mise Equipment - Dept. 33 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 $80,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $80,000
Quality and Quantity Meters - Dept. 31 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 $80,000
PWTF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SRF Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grant 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Internally Funded $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $80,000
Total Project Costs $3,295,000 $4,180,000 $4,719,000 $2,005,000 $3,720,000 $2,470,000 $5,070,000 $3,070,000 $28,529,000
14 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 2A
CAPITAL FUNDING ANALYSIS SUMMARY
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Beginning Balance $0 $687,000 $453,000 $0 $0 $2,688,000 $3,584,000 $1,847,980
Total Capital Projects
Sewer Main Replacement Program $100,000 $150,000 $220,000 $220,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $2,090,000
VWVTP & Pump Station Improvements 150,000 165,000 215,000 215,000 400,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 2,495,000
Fuel Tank Replacements (this rolled up to VWVTP Improv) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Automatic Power Switch Gear (this roll up to VWVTP Improv) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emergency Power Supply (this rolled up into VWVTP improv) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington Street - Beachmain Abandonment 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 5,000,000
KL-1, 2 &* PB-1 Pump Station Upgrade 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
New Roof on Control Building 0 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000
VWVT Solids Management 0 0 300,000 0 150,000 0 0 0 450,000
Headworks Mechanical Bar Screen 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
VWVTP Upgrade/frontage improvements 0 0 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000
Class A Water Filter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Methane Boiler 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Generator 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 750,000
Outfall 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 0 0 600,000
Digester 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 2,000,000
Water Reuse 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Anderson Cove Basin CSS Project (OF-12) 0 380,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 380,000
Trenton & Cherry Ave Basin CSO Reduc. (OF 7&3) 1,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,600,000
Pacific Avenue CSO Project (OF-16) 750,000 200,000 3,000,000 1,400,000 2,800,000 0 0 0 8,150,000
WW Collection and Trans System Improve - Oyster Bay 0 0 0 0 0 550,000 0 0 550,000
Anderson Cove 1&1 Study 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
Tracy!on PS (EB-6) - Construction/lmprovement 125,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,000
Campbell Way Beach Access @ Main Street 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000
VWVTP Capacity Upgrades 200,000 2,000,000 964,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,164,000
Gravity Belt Thickner 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
Misc Equipment - Dept. 33 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 80,000
Quality and Quantity Meters - Dept. 31 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 80,000
Total Project Costs $3,295,000 $4,180,000 $4,719,000 $2,005,000 $3,720,000 $2,470,000 $5,070,000 $3,070,000 $28,529,000
Less: Funding Sources
Annual Rate Funded Capital $600,000 $725,000 $750.000 $750,000 $2.200,000 $2,266,000 $2,333,980 $2,403,999 $12,028,979
System Development Charges 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 800,000
Revenue Bonds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PWTF Loans 992,000 380,000 570,000 690,000 2,708,000 0 0 0 5.340,000
SRF 1,980,000 45,000 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,825,000
Transfer from Stormwater 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 HJO,OOO 100,000 100,000 100,000 800,000
Interfund Loan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EPA Grants 210,000 2,596,000 1,630,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,4:l6,OOO
New Loan 0 0 316,000 365,000 0 0 0 0 B81,OOO
Transfer from Working Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Funding Sources $3,982,000 $3,946,000 $4,266,000 $2,005,000 $5,108,000 $2,466,000 $2,533,980 $2,603,999 $26,910,979
Additional Capital Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000 $900,000 $800,000 $500,000
Ending Capital Fund Balance $687,000 $453,000 $0 $0 $2,688,000 $3,584,000 $1,847,980 $1,881,979
Target Funding; Annual Average Capital or $270,000 $335,000 $455,000 $455,000 $770,000 $820,000 $820,000 $820,000
1.5% of Original Plant Value $1,417,038
15 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
Wastewater Fund
EXHIBIT 3
DEVELOPMENT OF VOLUME
ALLOCATION FACTORS
CUSTOMER CLASS
Residential
Residential- Outside
Multi-Family
Multi-Family - Outside
Commercial I
Commercial II
Commercial III
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
Total
Flow @ WWTP
Allocation Factor
Notes:
Plus: Total Flow
Annual Flow 45% Total Flow Annual Flow % of wlo Navy Annual Flow % of
(CCF) [1J 1&1 wI 1&1 (cet) (MGD) Total incl. 1&1 (cct) (MGD) Total
524,825 236,171 760,996 1.56 29.7% 760,996 1.56 33.9%
85,670 38,552 124,222 0.25 4.8% 124,222 0.25 5.5%
660,599 297,270 957,869 1.96 37.4% 957,869 1.96 42.7%
13,567 6,105 19,672 0.04 0.8% 19,672 0.04 0.9%
186,743 84,034 270,777 0.55 10.6% 270,777 0.55 12.1%
29,136 13,111 42,247 0.09 1.6% 42,247 0.09 1.9%
47,329 21,298 68,627 0.14 2.7% 68,627 0.14 3.1%
317,304 0 317,304 0.65 12.4% 0 0.00 0.0%
1,865,173 2,561,714 5.25 100.0% 2,244,410 4.60 100.0%
2003 Annual Flow MGD 5.25
(VOL)-W (VOL)-W/O
[1J Class flows taken from utility provided monthly WWTP Reports for Jan to December 2002
16 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
Wastewater Fund
EXHIBIT 4
DEVELOPMENT OF CUSTOMER
ALLOCATION FACTORS
CUSTOMER CLASS
Residential
Residential - Outside
Multi-Family
Multi-Family - Outside
Commercial I
Commercial II
Commercial '"
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
Total
Allocation Factor
Notes:
Customer Service & Accounting
Number of % of Weighting Weighted % of
Billing Units [2] Total Factor [3] Customer Total
7,205 51.4% 1.00 7,205 48.2%
450 3.2% 1.00 450 3.0%
5,415 38.6% 1.00 5,415 36.2%
145 1.0% 1.00 145 1.0%
668 4.8% 2.00 1,336 8.9%
70 0.5% 2.50 175 1.2%
70 0.5% 2.00 140 0.9%
3 0.0% 25.00 75 0.5%
14,026 100% 14,941 100%
(AC) (WeA)
[2J City provided no. of customers as of December 2002
[3J Weighting factors for "all other customers" ranged from 1.0 for residential,
2.5 for commercial II, 3.0 for commercial III and 25.0 for PSNS.
17 of 31
Wastewater Fund
EXHIBIT 5
DEVELOPMENT OF BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (BOD) AND SUSPENDED SOLIDS (SS)
ALLOCATION FACTORS
CUSTOMER CLASS
Residential
Residential- Outside
Multi-Family
Multi-Family - Outside
Commercial I
Commercial II
Commercial III
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
Total
Allocation Factor
Notes:
BOD
SS
Annual Strength WIO Navy Strength WIO Navy
Flow Avg. Factor Calculated %01 Calculated %01 Avg. Factor Calculated % 01 Calculated %01
(CCF) (mg/l) [4] Pounds [5] Total Pounds [5] Total (mg/l) [4] Pounds [5] Total Pounds [5] Total
524,825 200 655,198 24.6% 655,198 30.6% 200 655,198 24.6% 655,198 30.6%
85,670 200 106,951 4.0% 106,951 5.0% 200 106,951 4.0% 106,951 5.0%
660,599 200 824,700 30.9% 824,700 38.5% 200 824,700 30.9% 824,700 38.5%
13,567 200 16,937 0.6% 16,937 0.8% 200 16,937 0.6% 16,937 0.8%
186,743 280 326,385 12.2% 326,385 15.2% 280 326,385 12.2% 326,385 15.2%
29,136 550 100,028 3.7% 100,028 4.7% 550 100,028 3.7% 100,028 4.7%
47,329 375 110,786 4.2% 110,786 5.2% 375 110,786 4.2% 110,786 5.2%
317,304 266 526,848 19.7% 0 0.0% 266 526 848 19.7% 0 0.0%
1,865,173 2,667,833 100.0% 2,140,985 100.0% 2,667,833 100.0% 2,140,985 100.0%
7,309 Ibs per day
7,306 Annual Avg
(BOD)
7,309 Ibs per day
7,312 Annual Avg
(SS)
(SS-Navy)
(BOD-Navy)
[4J Strength factors assumed, based on discussions with City staff
BOD strength factors for "all other customers" ranged from 200 - residential to 280-550 - commercial I, II, 11/ and 266 for
PSNS. SS strength factors ranged from 200 - residential to 280-550 - commercial I,ll III and 266 for PSNS.
[5J Calculated Pounds = (CCF' 748) , Strength Factor' (8.345Ibs / One Million Gallons)
18 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
Wastewater Fund
EXHIBIT 6
DEVELOPMENT OF REVENUE RELATED
ALLOCATION FACTORS
CUSTOMER CLASS
Residential
Residential - Outside
Multi-Family
Multi-Family - Outside
Commercial I
Commercial II
Commercial III
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS)
Total
Allocation Factor
Total Rate
Revenues
$2,479,869
423,935
2,966,898
66,771
930,538
1/8,265
234.688
1,796,128
$9,077,092
% of Rate Revenue % of
Total w/o PSNS Total
27.3% $2,479,869 34.1%
4.7% 423,935 5.8%
32.7% 2,966,898 40.7%
0.7% 66,771 0.9%
10.3% 930,538 12.8%
2.0% 178,265 2.4%
2.6% 234,688 3.2%
19.8% 0 0.0%
100% $7,280,964 100%
(RR) (RR-PSNS)
19 of 31
ciTY OF BREMERTON Page 1 of2
Wastewater Fund
EXHIBIT7
FUNCTIONALIZATION ANO CLASSIFICATION
OF PLANT IN SERVICE Strength Related
Bio-oxygen Suspended CUstomer Revenue
Total Plant Volume (VOL) Demand (BOD) Solids (88) Actual W',~~~ Related Direct AssiQnment
Acet. No. Account Desa. as of 12/02 wI Naw wfo Navv wI Navv w/o Navv w/Nav w/o Navv lAC (RR Navv All other Basis of Classification
1937 Land $184,309 $184,309 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 100.0% VoVw Navy
Collection Plant
Building & Structures $21,074 $21,074 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 100,0% VOL-wI 0.0% DA-Navy
170 Other Improvements 2,922,238 2,922,236 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% VOL-wI 0,0% DA.Navy
\79 Mains 22,581,385 22,581,385 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% VOL-wI 0.0% DA-Navy
'79 Laterals 1,757,255 0 1,757,255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% VOL-w/o 0.0% DA-Navy
110 Manholes 4,901,881 4,901,881 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ' 100,0% VOL~I 0.0% DA~Navy
170 Interceptor 308,951 308,951 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100,0% VOL-wI 0.0% DA.Navy
Storm Sewer/Catchbasin 11,348,430 11,348,430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% VQL-wl 0.0% DA-Navy
Machinery & Equipment 309,428 309,428 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 100.0% VOL-wI 0.0% DA-Navy
188.1\ General Assets 84,991 84991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% VOL-wI 0.0% DA-Navy
Total CollectionfTransmission $44,235,631 $42,478,375 $1,757,255 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Pumping Plant
'" Land $71,724 $71,724 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 100.0% Vol/w Navy
'" Building & Structures 5,950,815 5,950,815 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% VoUwNavy
"9 Other Improvements 743,236 743,236 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Vollw Navy
'"' Machinery & EqUipment 5,611,307 5,611,307 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Vollw Navy
1886 General Assets 258,912 258,912 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0% Vollw Navy
Total Pumping Plant $12,635,994 $12,635,994 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Treatment Plant
land $451,872 $0 $225,936 $0 $70,040 $0 $67,781 $0 $0 $0 $88,115 $0 SO% VQI~w/o, 15.S% BOD-w/o, 1S% SS~w!o, 19.5 oA-Navy
Building & Structures 20 ,S56, 1 66 0 10,278,083 0 3,186,206 0 3,083,425 0 0 0 4,008,452 o SO% Vol-w/o, 15.5% BOo-w/o, 15% SS-w/o, 19.5 DA-Navy
"" Other Improvements 2,287,022 0 1,143,511 0 354,488 0 343,053 0 0 0 44S,969 o 50% Vol-w/o, 15.5% BOo-w/o, 15% S5-w/o, 19.5 oA-Navy
'"" Machinery & Equipment 10,859,710 0 5,429,855 0 1,683,255 0 1,628,957 0 0 0 2,117,643 o SO% Vol-w/o, 15.5% BOD-w/o, 15% 5S-wlo, 19.5 DA-Navy
General Assets 367 054 0 183,527 0 56,893 0 55058 0 0 0 71576 o 50% Vol-w/o, 15.5% BOD-w/o, 15% 55-w/o, 19.5 oA-Navy
Total Treatment Plant $34,521,824 $0 $17,260,912 $0 $5,350,883 $0 $5,178,274 $0 $0 $0 $6,731,756 $0
Total Plant before General Plant $91,577,758 $55,298,679 $19,018,167 $0 $5,350,883 $0 $5,178,274 $0 $0 $0 $6,731,756 $0
100.0% 60.4% 20.8% 0.0% 5.8% 0.0% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0%
General
'" Land $93,029 $55,175 $19,320 $0 $5,436 $0 $5,260 $0 $0 $0 $6,838 $0 As Plant in Service
'" Buildings & Structures 2,230,207 1 ,346,697 463,152 0 130,311 0 126,107 0 0 0 163,939 o /J.s Plant in Service
'" Other Improvements 325,348 196,459 67,566 0 19,010 0 18,397 0 0 0 23,916 o h, Plant In Service
1688 General Assets 242,878 146,660 50439 0 14191 0 13734 0 0 0 17 854 o As Plant In Service
Total General Plant $2,891,462 $1,745,992 $600,477 $0 $168,948 $0 $163,498 $0 $0 $0 $212,547 $0
Total Plant in Service $94,489,220 $57,044,671 $19,618,644 $0 $5,519,831 $0 $5,341,772 $0 $0 $0 $6,944,303 $0
% Plant in Service 100.0% 60.4% 20.8% 0.0% 5.8% 0.0% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0%
Less: Accumulated Oepreciation
1919 Intangible $84,301 $84,301 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Land
17. Buildings & Structures 7,128,382 1,814,078 2,882,457 0 822,073 0 795,555 0 0 0 1,034,221 o /J.s Bldgs & struc.
'"' Other Improvements 12,564,559 11,453,098 790,571 0 99,476 0 96,267 0 0 0 125,147 o As Other Improv.less oA Navy [1]
'"' Machinery & Equipment 7,054,557 7,054,557 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o /J.s Mach & EClUIP.
'"' General Assets 376,220 193,492 92,283 0 28,038 0 27,133 0 0 0 35,273 o As General Assets
Aceum Depree. on Navy Contributions [1] 898975 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 898975 0
Total Depreciation $28,106,994 $20,599,525 $3,545,311 $0 $949,587 $0 $918,955 $0 $0 $0 $2,093,616 $0
Net Plant In Service $66,362,226 $36,445,146 $16,073,333 $0 $4,570,244 $0 $4,422,817 $0 $0 $0 $4,850,687 $0
100.0% 54.9% 24.2% 0.0% 6.9% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.3% 0.0%
20 of 31
ciTY OF BREMERTON
Wastewater Fund
EXHIBIT 1
FUNCTIONALIZATION ANO CLASSIFICATION
OF PLANT IN SERVICE
Acct. No. Account Desc.
Plus Cash Working Capital
1/8 O&M Expense
Prepayments
Inventories (materials and supplies)
Total Cash Working Capital
Less: Contrib in Aid of Constn.lction [2]
Less: Net Navy Capital Charges [3]
Net Contributions In Aid of Construction
NET RATE BASE
Page 20f2
Strength Related
Bia-oxygen Suspended Customer Revenue
Total Plant Volume (VOl) Demand (800) Solids (SS) A:~~: Weighted Related Direct Assif:lnment
as of 12/02 wI Naw wlo Navv wI Navv wlo NavY wi Navv wlo Navv IWCAl IRR Navv All other BasIs of Classification
$578,609 9336,358 9120,681 90 $34,314 $0 $33,207 $17,629 $0 $0 $36,420 $0 As Q&M Expenliies
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As O&M Expenaes
343,061 207,155 71,244 0 20,045 0 19,398 0 0 0 25,218 o As Other Improv.
$921,670 9543,513 $191,925 $0 $54,359 $0 $52,606 $17 ,629 $0 $0 $61,638 $0
$34,362,544 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2.609.709 $31.752,835 As DA All Other; Navy Id'd CIA
4 597 525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4597525 A.s DA All Other
$29,765,019 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,609,709 $27.155,310
$31,518,877 $36,988,660 $16,265,258 $0 $4,624,603 $0 $4,415,422 $11,629 $0 $0 $2,302,615 1$21,155,310)
100.0% 98.6% 43.4% 0.0% 12.3% 0.0% 11.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1% -72.4%
[1] Adjustment to accumulated depreciation to ensure that a negative rate base does not result from the treatment of CIAC.
(2] Contributions in aid of contruction assigned to the Navy include the amortized amount for the Navy's capital contribution to the WNrP and WWTP improvements = Navy's "true" capital contribution
[3] Net navy capital charges IS deducted from contributions in aid to indicate that this capital payment was to compensate the City for capital costs and is not a "true" capital contribution and should not be used to reduce rate base.
Prior Study
Contribution
5,600,796
762,405
total year amort
7
1,003,271
136,570
/year amort
(Ci2 2.559%
143,324
19,510
21 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
Wastewater Fund
EXHIBIT 8
ALLOCA TION OF RATE BASE
Residential Residential Multi Family Multi Family Basis of
Classification Comoonent Rate Base Inside Outside Inside Outside COMMI COMMII COMMIII PSNS Allocation
Volume Related
Volume - wlNavy $36,988,660 $10,988,046 $1,793,638 $13,830,690 $284,Q47 $3,909,762 $610,008 $990,908 $4,581,561 (VOL)
Volume - wlo Navy 16,265,258 5,514,946 900,234 6,941,681 142,564 1,962,326 306,166 497,341 0
Total Volume Related $53,253,917 $16,502,992 $2,693,872 $20,772,371 $426,611 $5,872,087 $916,174 $1,488,249 $4,581,561
Strength Related
Bio-oxygen Demand - With Navy $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (BOD)
Sio-oxygen Demand - Without Navy $4,624,603 1,415,250 231,019 1,781,380 36,585 705,003 216,063 239,303 0
Suspended Solids - With Navy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (55)
Suspended Solids - Without Navy 4,475,422 1,369,597 223,567 1,723,916 35,405 682,261 209,094 231,583 0
Total Strength Related $9,100,025 2,784,847 454,585 3,505,296 71,990 1,387,264 425,157 470,886 0
Customer Related
Actual $17,629 $9,056 $566 $6,806 $182 $840 $88 $88 $4 (AC)
Weighted 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (WCA)
Total Customer Related $17,629 $9,056 $566 $6,806 $182 $840 $88 $88 $4
Revenue Related $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (RR)
Direct Assignments
Direct Assignment - Navy $2,302,615 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,302,615 (DA)
Direct Assignment - All other (27,155,31 Q) (9,067,539) (1,479,714) 111,411,184) 1234,376) 13,411,537) 1630,328) 1920,631 ) 0
Total Direct Assignment ($24,852,694) ($9,067,539) ($1,479,714) ($11,411,184) ($234,376) ($3,411,537) ($630,328) ($920,631 ) $2,302,615
--....---------
Total Allocated Rate Base $37,518,877 $10,229,355 $1,669,309 $12,873,290 $264,407 $3,848,654 $711,091 $1,038,591 $6,884,180
100.0% 27.3% 4.4% 34.3% 0.7% 10.3% 1.9% 2.8% 18.3%
22 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
EXHIBIT 9
FUNCTIONALlZATION AND CLASSIFICATION
OF EXPENSES
Page 1 of 3
Blo-oxygen 8uspended Customer
Revenue Req. Volume {VOLl Demand mODI Solids (88) A~~U;: W~~6~d Revenue Related Direct AsslQnment
Acct. No. Account Descrintlon 2004 wi Na~ wlo Navv wi Navv wlo Navv wI Navv w/o Navv (RR (RR-PSNS Nav All Other BasIs of Classification
451.31 Water Resources
X.X.535.5031 Maintenance
XXX.51.001 Reallocated Labor Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53121 Office & Operating Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
XXX53.510 UtIlity Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
XXX.53.530 Small Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
XX.x.S4810 Computer Related Items 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.x.X.S4910 Equipment Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
XXX.54.000 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.XXS4.220 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in ServIce
X.X.X.S4.520 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.S4.810 EqUipment Rental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
X.X.x.S4910 Equipment Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
Total Maintenance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
XX535.7031 Customer Service
XXX.51.00l Reallocated Labor Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 100% AC
X.XX.53.120 Office & Operating Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% AC
XXX54.000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.110 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.54.220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% AC
X.X.X.54.300 Travel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
XXX54.910 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
Total customer Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
X.x.535.B031 Operations
XXX51.001 Reallocated Labor Costs $93,917 $51,576 $22,747 $0 $6,468 $0 $6,259 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,665 $0 As Plant In Service
XXX.53.110 Operating Supplies 10,000 5,492 2,422 0 669 0 666 0 0 0 0 731 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53.121 Utility Inventory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53.510 Small Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53.530 Computer Related Items 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
XXX.54.000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 4,212 2,313 1,020 0 290 0 261 0 0 0 0 306 o As Plant in Service
X x.x.54.11o ProfeSSional Services 25,000 13,730 6,055 0 1,722 0 1,666 0 0 0 0 1,627 o As Plant In Service
X X.x.54.2l0 Telecommunications 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.x.X.54.220 Postage 1,000 549 242 0 69 0 67 0 0 0 0 73 o As Plant in Service
X.x X 54.300 Travel 500 275 121 0 34 0 33 0 0 0 0 37 o As Plant In Service
XXX 54.400 AdvertiSing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
XXX.54.gi0 Miscellaneous 1,000 549 242 0 69 0 67 0 0 0 0 73 o As Plant In Service
Total Operations $135,629 $74,485 $32,850 $0 $9,341 $0 $9,039 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,914 $0
Total Water Resource Manager $135,629 $74,485 $32,850 $0 $9,341 $0 $9,039 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,914 $0
451.32 Wastewater Manager
X X.535.5032 Maintenance
X.X.X.5i.001 Reallocated Labor Costs $558,841 $306,907 $135,355 $0 $38,486 $0 $37,245 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,848 $0 As Plant In Service
X.X.X.53.110 Office & Operating Supplies 150,000 82,378 36,331 0 10,330 0 9,997 0 0 0 0 10,964 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53.210 Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53.5i0 Small Tools & EqUipment 40,000 21,967 9,688 0 2.755 0 2,666 0 0 0 0 2,924 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53.530 Computer Related Items 20,000 10,984 4,844 0 1,377 0 1,333 0 0 0 0 1,462 o As Plant in ServIce
X.X.X.54.000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 17,939 9,852 4,345 0 1,235 0 1,196 0 0 0 0 1,311 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.1i0 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
X X.X.54.300 Travel 1,500 824 363 0 103 0 100 0 0 0 0 110 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.54.520 Equipment 9,000 4,943 2,180 0 620 0 600 0 0 0 0 658 o As Plant In Service
x X.X.54.740 Garbage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.810 Equipment Repair 100,000 54,919 24,221 0 6,887 0 6,665 0 0 0 0 7,309 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.54.B30 Structures & Grounds Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
X.x.X.54.919 Miscellaneous 3000 1,648 727 0 207 0 200 0 0 0 0 219 o As Plant in Service
Total Maintenance $900,280 $494,420 $218,053 $0 $62,001 $0 $60,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,805 $0
Strength Related
23 of 31
Page 2 of3
CITY OF BREMERTON
EXHIBIT 9
FUNCTIONALlZATION AND CLASSIFICATION
OF EXPENSES
Strength Related
BioMoxygen Suspended Customer
Revenue Req. Volume (VOLI Demand IBOO) Solids (SS) Actual W~~~~d Revenue Related Direct AssiQnment
Acct, No. Account Descri tlon 2004 wI Naw w/c Naw wlNav wlo Navv wI Naw wlo Naw AC RR RR-PSNS Nav All Other Basis of Classification
X.X.SJS.8032 Operations
X.X.X.51.001 Reallocated Labor Costs $626,276 $343,941 $151,6B8 $0 $43,130 $0 $41,739 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,777 $0 As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53,110 Office & Operating Supplies 1B1,000 99,403 43,839 0 12,465 0 12,063 0 0 0 0 13,230 o As Plant. wI Navy
X.X.X.S3210 Fuel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
x.x.X.SJ.Sl0 Small Tools & Equipment 11,000 6,041 2,664 0 758 0 733 0 0 0 0 804 o As Plant in Service
XX.X.53.S30 Computer Related Items 70,000 38,443 16,954 0 4,821 0 4,665 0 0 0 0 5,117 o As Plant in Service
X.x.X.S4.000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 21,229 11,659 5,142 0 1,462 0 1,415 0 0 0 0 1,552 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.110 ProfeSSional Services 100,000 54,919 24,221 0 6,887 0 6,665 0 0 0 0 7,309 o As Plant 11'1 Service
X.X.X.54.210 Telecommunications 48,000 25,361 11,626 0 3,306 0 3,199 0 0 0 0 3,509 o As Plant in Service
X.x.x.54.220 Postage 2,600 1,428 530 0 179 0 173 0 0 0 0 190 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X,S4.300 Travel 6,000 3,295 1,453 0 413 0 400 0 0 0 0 439 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54 <100 Advertising 2,000 1,098 484 0 138 0 133 0 0 0 0 145 o A5 Plant in SeMce
X.X.X.54.520 Rents - Equipment 3,500 1,922 848 0 241 0 233 0 0 0 0 256 o As Plant 11'1 Service
XX.X.5<1.710 Natural Gas 8,000 4,393 1,938 0 551 0 533 0 0 0 0 585 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.720 Electricity 475,000 475,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 100.0% VOL wI Navy
X.X.X.54.no WeterlSewerlstormwater 65,000 35,697 15,743 0 4,476 0 4,332 0 0 0 0 4,751 o As Plant In Service
XX.X.54.740 Garbage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.5<1.810 Equipment Repair 22,782 12,512 5,518 0 1,569 0 1,518 0 0 0 0 1,665 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.910 Miscellaneous 55,000 30205 13321 0 3,788 0 3,666 0 0 0 0 4,020 o As Plant in Service
Total Operations $1,697,387 $1,146,317 $296,070 $0 $84,184 $0 $81,468 $0 $0 $0 $0 $89,349 $0
Total Wa5tewater Manager $2,597,667 $1,640,737 $514,123 $0 $146,184 $0 $141,469 $0 $0 $0 $0 $155,154 $0
451.32 Utility Openltions
X.X.535.50J3 Maintenance
X.x.x.51.001 Reallocated Labor Costs $448,929 $246,545 $108,733 $0 $30,917 $0 $29,920 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,814 $0 As Plant In Service
X.X.x.53.110 Operating Supplies 30,000 16,476 7,266 0 2,066 0 1,999 0 0 0 0 2,193 o As Plant in Service
X.XX.53.121 Utility Inventory 7,000 3,844 1,695 0 482 0 467 0 0 0 0 512 o As Plant in Service
X.XX.53.510 Small Tools & EqUipment 10,000 5,492 2,422 0 6B9 0 666 0 0 0 0 731 o As Plant in Service
X.x.x.53.530 Computer Related Items 4,000 2,197 969 0 275 0 267 0 0 0 0 292 o As Plant in Service
X.x.X54.000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 107,106 58,821 25,942 0 7,376 0 7,138 0 0 0 0 7,829 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54,110 Professional Services 2,000 1,098 484 0 138 0 133 0 0 0 0 146 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.5<1.210 Telecommunications 70D 384 170 0 48 0 47 0 0 0 0 51 o As Plant in Service
X.x.x.5<1.220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.X.x.54.300 Travel 1,000 549 242 0 69 0 67 0 0 0 0 73 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.520 Equipment 2,000 1,098 484 0 138 0 133 0 0 0 0 146 o As Plant in Service
X.X.x.54.520 Rents. EqUIpment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.7.40 Garbage 6,000 3,295 1,453 0 413 0 4DO 0 0 0 0 439 o As Plant 11'1 Service
X.X.X.54.e10 EqUipment Repair 5,000 2,746 1,211 0 344 0 333 0 0 0 0 365 o As Plantin Service
X.x.X54.~2Q Repairs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.54.910 Miscellaneous 10,000 5,492 2,422 0 689 0 666 0 0 0 0 731 o As Plant 11'1 Service
Total Mall'ltenance $633,735 $348,038 $153,494 $0 $43,644 $0 $42,236 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,322 $0
X X.S35.703J Customer Service
X.X.X51.001 Reallocated Labor Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 100% AC
X.X.X.54.000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
Total Gust Service $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Utility Operations $533,735 $348,038 $153,494 $0 $43,644 $0 $42,236 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,322 $0
451.35 Wastewater Administration
X.X535.10J5 Administration
XXX.51.001 Reallocated Labor Costs $105,501 $57,940 $25,553 $0 $7,266 $0 $7,031 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,712 $0 As Plant in Service
X.X.X53.110 Office & Operating Supplies 1,200 659 291 0 83 0 80 0 0 0 0 88 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53.510 Small Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a As Plant In Service
X.x.X.53.530 Computer Related Items 500 275 121 0 34 0 33 0 0 0 0 37 o As Plant In Service
X.XX.54.000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.X.x.S.4.110 ProfeSSional Services 10,000 5,492 2,422 0 689 0 666 0 0 0 0 731 o As Plant in Service
X.x.X5<1,119 IFD Professional Services 276,268 151,722 66,914 0 19,026 0 18.412 0 0 0 0 20,194 o As Plant In Service
X.x.X.54.210 Telecommunications 8,000 4,393 1,938 0 551 0 533 0 0 0 0 585 o A5 Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.220 Postage 4,500 2,471 1,090 0 310 0 300 0 0 0 0 329 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.300 Travel 1,500 824 363 0 103 0 100 0 0 0 0 110 a As Plant In Service
X.X.X.5.4..400 Advertising 250 137 61 0 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 18 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X54520 EqUipment Rental 2,554 1,403 619 0 176 0 170 0 0 0 0 167 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.510 Rents - Land & BUildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.XX.54.619 IFD Insurance Premiums 201,818 110,835 48,882 0 13,899 0 13,450 0 0 0 0 14,752 o As Plant in Service
X,X.X.54.620 Claim Payments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.54.7<10 Garbage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.54.el0 Equipment Repair 650 357 157 0 45 0 43 0 0 0 0 48 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.910 Miscellaneous 5,000 2746 1,211 0 344 0 333 0 0 0 0 365 o As Plant in Service
Total Administration $617,741 $339,254 $149,621 $0 $42,543 $0 $41,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,153 $0
24 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 9
FUNCTlONALlZATlON AND CLASSIFICATION
OF EXPENSES Strength Related
Bio-oxygen Suspended Customer
Revenue Req. Volume (VOU Demand IBOD) Solids (S5) A;lU;: W~~~~d Revenue Related Direct AsslQnment
Acct. No Account DescrI tlon 2004 wi Navy w/o NavY wi Naw w/o Navv wi Nav"V. wlo Naw RR RR-PSNS> Naw All other BasIs of Classification
X.X.535.7035 Customer Service
X.X.X.51.001 Reallocated Labor Costs $133,505 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $133,505 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 100% AC
X.X.X.53.110 Office & Operating Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
X.x.X.54 000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 4,091 2,247 991 0 282 0 273 0 0 0 0 299 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54.110 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
XXX.54.119 IFD Professional SerNces 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant In Service
X X X 54.220 Postage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% AC
XXX54.300 Travel 825 453 200 0 57 0 55 0 0 0 0 60 o A6 Plant in Service
X.XX54.910 Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
Total Customer Service $138,421 $2,700 $1,191 $0 $339 $0 $328 $133,505 $0 $0 $0 $359 $0
0
Total Wastewater Administration $756,162 $341,954 $150,811 $0 $42,881 $0 $41,498 $133,505 $0 $0 $0 $45,513 $0
Wastewater Engineering
X.X.535.8037 Operations
XX.X51.001 Reallocated Labor Costs $226,545 $124,415 $54,871 $0 $15,602 $0 $15,098 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,559 $0 As Plant in Service
X.X.X.53.110 Office & Operating Supplies 3,000 1,648 727 0 207 0 200 0 0 0 0 219 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.53510 Small Tools & Equipment 1,900 1,043 460 0 131 0 127 0 0 0 0 139 o As Plant in Service
XXX 54530 Computer Related Items 7,000 3,844 1,695 0 482 0 467 0 0 0 0 512 o As Plant in Service
X.X'x'54.000 Reallocated Vehicle Costs 8,016 4,402 1,942 0 552 0 534 0 0 0 0 586 o As Plant in Service
X.XX.54110 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o As Plant in Service
xxx 54220 Postage 125 69 30 0 9 0 8 0 0 0 0 9 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.54300 Travel 2,000 1,098 484 0 138 0 133 0 0 0 0 146 o As Plant In Service
X.X.X.54400 AdvertiSing 2,500 1,373 606 0 172 0 167 0 0 0 0 183 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54520 Rents ~ Equipment 1,800 989 436 0 124 0 120 0 0 0 0 132 o As Plant In SefYIce
XXX.54810 Equipment Repair 1,700 934 412 0 117 0 113 0 0 0 0 124 o As Plant in Service
X.X.X.54910 Miscellaneous 4,000 2,197 969 0 275 0 267 0 0 0 0 292 o As Plant in Service
Total Engineering Operations $258,586 $142,012 $62,631 $0 $17,80. $0 $17,234 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18.901 $0
TOTAL O&M EXPENSES $4,3.1,779 $2,547,226 $913,910 $0 $259,858 $0 $251,476 $133,505 $0 $0 $0 $275,804 $0
TaxeslTransfer Payments
Intergovernmental Service $239,246 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $239,246 $0 $0 $0 100% RR
~ayment in Lieu ofTaxes 771,553 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 771,553 0 0 0 100% RR
Total Taxes/Transfer Payments $1,010,799 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,010,799 $0 $0 $0
Depreciation Expense S2,~41.602 1,231,054 542,930 154,375 149,395 163,848 o As Plant in Service - 2002 Depree.
Net O&M Plus Depreciation $7,634,180 $3,778,280 $1,456,839 $0 $414,233 $0 $400,871 $133,505 $0 $1,010,799 $0 $439,652 $0
25 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
Wastewater Fund
EXHIBIT 10
ALLOCATION OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENT
Residential Residential Multi Family Multi Family
Classification Comoonent Revenue Reo. Inside Outside Inside Outside COMMI COMMII COMMIII PSNS
Volume Related
Volume - wlNavy $3,778,280 $1,122,396 $183,215 $1,412,763 $29,015 $399,370 $62,311 $101,218 $467,993
Volume - w/o Navy 1456,839 493,960 80 632 621,749 12 769 175761 27,423 44,546 0
Total Volume Related $5,235,120 $1,616,356 $263,846 $2,034,513 $41,784 $575,131 $89,733 $145,764 $467,993
Strength Related
Bio-oxygen Demand - With Navy $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bio-oxygen Demand - Without Navy 414,233 126,766 20,693 159,561 3,277 63,148 19,353 21,435 0
Suspended Solids - With Navy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Suspended Solids - Without Navy 400,871 122,677 20,025 154,414 3,171 61,111 18,729 20,743 0
Total Strength Related $815,104 249,443 40,718 313,975 6,448 124,260 38,082 42,178 0
Customer Related
Actual $133,505 $68,580 $4,283 $51,542 $1,380 $6,358 $666 $666 $29
Weighted 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Customer Related $133,505 $68,580 $4,283 $51,542 $1,380 $6,358 $666 $666 $29
Revenue Related
Revenue Related - All $1,010,799 $276,151 $47,208 $330,385 $7,435 $103,622 $19,851 $26,134 $200,012
Revenue Related - wlo PSNS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Revenue Related $1,010,799 $276,151 $47,208 $330,385 $7,435 $103,622 $19,851 $26,134 $200,012
Direct Assignments
Direct Assignment - Navy $439,652 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $439,652
Direct Assignment - All Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Direct Assignment $439,652 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $439,652
Total Allocated Revenue Requirement $7,634,180 $2,210,530 $356,056 $2,730,415 $57,047 $809,371 $148,332 $214,742 $1,107,685
26 of 31
Basis of
Allocation
(VOL)
(BOD)
(SS)
(AC)
(WCA)
(RR)
(RR-PSNS)
(DA)
CITY OF BREMERTON
Wastewater Fund
EXHIBIT 11
DEVELOPMENT OF THE RETURN
COMPONENT
Residential Residential Multi Family Multi Family
Total Inside Outside Inside Outside COMMI COMMII COMMIII PSNS Notes/Reference
Present Rate Revenues $9,077,092 $2,479,869 $423,935 $2,966,898 $66,771 $930,538 $178,265 $234,688 $1,796,128 Exhibit 6; Revenue Related Allocation Factor
Less: Expenses 7,634,180 $2,210,530 $356,056 $2,730,415 $57,047 $809,371 $148,332 $214,742 $1,107,685 Exhibit 10; Allocation of Rev. Requirements
Net Income $1,442,912 $269,339 $67,879 $236,483 $9,724 $121,167 $29,933 $19,946 $688,443 Difference of Lines Above
Rate Base $37,518,877 $10,229,355 $1,669,309 $12,873,290 $264,407 $3,848,654 $711,091 $1,038,591 $6,884,180 Exhibit 9; Allocation of Rate Base
% Rate of Return 7.19% 6.92% 9.001l/0 6.92% 9.00% 6.92% 6.92% 6.92% 7.805% See Footnote [1J
Return Component $2,698,202 $708,139 $150,238 $891,168 $23,797 $266,427 $49,226 $71,898 $537,310 Rate Base (x) Rate of Return
Total Net Revenue Requirement $10,332,382 $2,918,669 $506,294 $3,621,583 $80,844 $1,075,798 $197,559 $286,640 $1,644,995 Current Expenses (+) Return Component
Plus; Additional Taxes $176,905 $49,972 $8,668 $62,007 $1,384 $18,419 $3,382 $4,908 $28,165 6% Interfund & 3.852% Excise Tax on Add', Rev.
Total Revised Revenue Requirements $10,509,287 $2,968,641 $514,962 $3,683,590 $82,228 $1,094,218 $200,941 $291,548 $1673,160 Total Rev. Req. (+) Intergovtllnterfund
$ Difference ($1,432,195) ($488,772) ($91,027) ($716,692) ($15,457) ($163,680) ($22,676) ($56,860) $122,968 Present Rates (-) Revised Rev. Requirement
% Difference 15.8% 19.7% 21.5% 24.2% 23.1% 17.6% 12.7% 24.2% -6.8% $ Difference (I) Present Rate Revenues
[1] See Rate of Return Worksheet
27 of 31
CITY OF BREMERTON
EXHIBIT 12
AVERAGE UNIT COSTS
Residential Residential Multi Family Multi Family
Total Inside Outside Inside Outside COMMI COMMII COMMIII PSNS
Volume Costs - $ / eef $2.81 $3.08 $3.08 $3.08 $3.08 $3.08 $3.08 $3.08 $1.47
Strength Costs - $ / eef $0.44 $0.48 $0.48 $0.48 $0.48 $0.67 $1.31 $0.89 $0.00
RevenuelDireet - $ / eef $0.78 $0.53 $0.55 $0.50 $0.55 $0.55 $0.68 $0.55 $2.02
Return Component $1.45 $1.35 $1.75 $1.35 $1.75 $1.43 $1.69 $1.52 $1.69
Total $/ eef $5.47 $5.43 $5.86 $5.40 $5.86 $5.73 $6.76 $6.04 $5.18
Customer Costs - $ / Cust. / mo. $0.79 $0.79 $0.79 $0.79 $0.79 $0.79 $0.79 $0.79 $0.79
Average Total Costs - $ / eef $5.54 $5.56 $5.91 $5.48 $5.96 $5.76 $6.78 $6.06 $5.18
Basic Data -
Billed Annual Flow - cd 1,865,173 524,825 85,670 660,599 13,567 186,743 29,136 47,329 317,304
Number of Customers 14,026 7,205 450 5,415 145 668 70 70 3
28 of 31
Specifically, the proposed definitions for determining the rate of return for rate setting purposes is as follows:
"The Rate of Return allowed under this contract shall be the City's cost of debt plus a risk premium of2.5%.
The rate of return will be reviewed in any cost of service study prepared by the City for its utilities throughout
the life of this contract. The rate of return shall also meet the following tests:
I) It shall be the greater of:
a. The City's cost of embedded debt plus 2.5%, or
b. The City's current cost of non-subsidized borrowing plus 2.5%
2) It shall always be greater than or equal to the rate of return for in-City retail customers (owner customers),
but less than or equal to the rate of return for outside city customers
3) It shall always be greater than or equal to zero
The City's "cost of borrowing" shall be the numerical (simple) average of at least three recent debt issues
(within the previous 90 days if possible) in the marketplace for municipal entities with similar terms and
credit ratings. The City's "cost of embedded debt" shall be the weighted average of all non-subsidized
outstanding debt for the combined utilities. These indexes shall be submitted to the Navy for review and
comment prior to use in a future CO SA prepared by the City."
29 of 31
1994 Water/Sewer Revenue
1994 Water/Sewer Revenue
2005 Water/Sewer Revenue
2002 Lease Purchase Pitney Bowes CC
Total Weighted Average Interest Cost
Plus: Risk Premium of 2.5%
Maturity
Date
09/01/06
09/01/07
6/31/05
4/30/07
Interest
Rate
5,1
5,5
5,1
7,3
Test 1 Total Rate of Return ~ Current Debt + Risk Premium
Current Cost of Borrowing
Plus: Risk Premium of 2,5%
Total Rate of Return ~ Cost of Borrowing + Risk Premium
Test 2
Rate of Return to Be Used - Greater of Test 1 or Test 2
UTILITY SYSTEM NONSUBSIDlZED REVENUE BONDS AND LOANS
Outstanding
12/31/2005
$ 2,515,000
2,655,000
406,587
8,056
5,582,843
Fund
451
451
401
401
Water Utility (401) Wastewater Utility (451) Stormwater Utility (481) Combined Systems
Debt Weighted Debt Weighted Debt Weighted Debt Weighted
Amount Ave. % Amount Ave. % Amount Ave.%. Amount Ave. %
$ 2,515,000 2.461 $ 2,515,000 2,296
2,655,000 2,624 2,655,000 2,616
$ 406,587 5.025 406,587 0.371
6,056 0.107 6,056 0,008
$ 412,643 5.132 % $ 5,170,000 5.305 % -r-- 0.000 % 5,582,643 5.293 %
2.500 % 2.500 % 2.500 % 2.500 %
7.632 % 7.605 % 2.500 % 7.793 %
4.560 % 4.560 % 4,560 % 4.560 %
2.500 % 2,500 % 2.500 % 2.500 %
7.060 % 7.060 % 7.060 % 7,060 %
7.632 % 7.805 % 7.060 % 7.793 %
30 of 31
SEWER ESCALATION 2004 TO 2008
Following
Revenue % What City % Navy % Navy as a
Requir. Change Adopted Change Adjustments Change % of Total
Old Revenue $9,077,092 $9,077,092 $1,796,128
1st Year Adjustment [1] $10,509,287 15.8% $9,984,801 10.0% $1,673,160 -6.8% 15.92%
2nd Year Adjustment $11,382,673 8.3% = $11,382,673 14.0% $1,812,210 8.3% 15.92%
3rd Year Adjustment $11,860,746 4.2% $11,860,746 4.2% $1,888,323 4.2% 15.92%
4th (2008) Adjustment $12,275,872 3.5% $12,275,872 3.5% $1,954,414 3.5% 15.92%
[1] - The revenue requirement for 2004 is adjusted from the original 2004 study to reflect the additional
PilOT payments included within revised study.
Note: Navy amount of $1 ,679,086 represents the final negotiated amount.
Sewer Rate Design - 2008 Rates
Target Rev. from C-O-S $1,954,414
Fixed Costs (50%)
Variable Costs (50%)
$976,800
$977,614
$1,954,414
12 Mths =
317,304 ccf =
$81,400 IMonth
$3.08 ICCF
31 of 31
DATE SUBMITTED: June 10,2008
BILL #
08- /s 1
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
5I
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Budget Adjustment for City
Attorney's Office
Committee Meeting Date: June 25, 2008
COUNCIL MEETING Date: July 2, 2008
Department: City Attorney's Office
Presenter: Roger A. Lubovich
Phone: 473-2345
SUMMARY: The City Attorney's Office 2008 budget for professional services (54110) was
calculated based on disbursement levels from prior years. However, recent litigation requiring outside
counsel has resulted in a need for additional funds in order to provide the City with necessary and
uniquely experienced outside counsel. This litigation includes labor arbitration and a significant
constitutional law issue. Staff is requesting a budget adjustment in the amount of $75,000 to fund the
remaining anticipated attorneys' fees for 2008.
ATTACHMENTS: None.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Additional expenditure for the General Fund -
City Attorney's Office of $75,000 above the current budget expectations. The 2008 ending fund
balance will be used to fund this budget adjustment.
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
~
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize a budget adjustment in the amount of$75,000 to
the City Attorney's Office 2008 professional services budget.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
DATE SUBMITTED: June 10, 2008
BILL #
oB-lftJo
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
6A
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: 2008 Justice Assistance Grant
Application
Committee Meeting Date: June 25, 2008
COUNCIL MEETING Date: July 2, 2008
Department: Police
Presenter: Chief Rogers
Phone: 473-5224
SUMMARY: The Bremerton Police Department applied for an Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance
Grant (JAG) that will allow the City of Bremerton to support a broad range of activities to prevent and control
crime based on our own local needs and conditions. These needs are to purchase audio/video equipment for
recording and collecting events that take place in Department interview rooms. Funds will also purchase
ancillary .equipment for a multi-purpose incident command vehicle needed in times of disasters, active shooters,
terrorist events, crime scenes and vehicle accidents. The grant is from the Department of Justice. No matching
funds are required of the City. The total grant amount is $19,600.00. The grant duration is through September
2012.
A TT ACHMENTS: Budget Narrative of the Grant Application
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None. The JAG funding is a revenue source for $19,
600.00. It will provide dollars for interview room and incident command vehicle equipment purchases.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
CONSENT AGENDA D
GENERAL BUSINESS X
PUBLIC HEARING
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to authorize the Police Department to apply for the Justice Assistance Grant for
2008 equipment funding.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
Bud2et Narrative
The digital interview room solution enables investigators to capture, playback, annotate, save and
manage audio/video recordings of custodial interrogations and interviews. The units will be
located in the Department's interrogation rooms and jointly maintained with in-house staff and
vendor support. It provides for easier transcription of recordings which results in more accurate
transcripts; and improves productivity without changing established procedures.
Equipment:
Blue Tube DSP/Pre-Amp
Security Dome Camera
Boundary Microphone
$1,500.00
$1,900.00
$1,300.00
$4,700.00
Total:
The multi-purpose incident command vehicle will be used for disasters, active shooter and
terrorist events, vehicle accidents and crime scenes. Command vehicles ensure that senior staff
and critical support staff can perform their administrative functions and tasking with efficient use
of resources, and effectively manage and control events as they develop or propagate
Equipment:
Portable Generator (2000 Watts)
Inverters (2)
Mobile Computer Terminal (2)
Wireless Cards (2)
Printer
Awning (Side)
Awning Canopy
Curtains
Command Post Kits
Refrigerators (2) Mini)
Water Tank and External Faucet
Interior (Retrofit)
$1,200.00
$1,000.00
$6,000.00
$800.00
$750.00
Total:
$700.00
$500.00
$400.00
$3,550.00
$14,900.00
$19,600.00
Total Expenditure
~
DATE SUBMITTED: June 9th, 2008
BILL #
08-lfol
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
~B
.............................................................................,...........
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 30(o?
Authorizing a Sole Source Contract and
Goods and Services Agreement for the
Purchase of a Romtec Restroom for
Blueberry Park
Committee Meeting Date: June 25, 2008
COUNCIL MEETING Date: July 2, 2008
Department: Parks
Presenter: Wyn Birkenthal
Phone: 473-5752
SUMMARY: The purchase of the restroom for Blueberry Park is part of the park improvements
funded by state and federal grants. Romtec is the only pre-engineered site built restroom company in
the country that provides complete building packages with the ability to customize the facility to meet
the functional needs and aesthetic character of the park's farm-themed design. Romtec's pre-designed
restroom packages cut months off the typical design process (in which the customer hires an architect
and engineer) and can save up to $30,000 in design fees.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memorandum from Parks Director recommending sole source purchase ofRomtec Restroom
2. Proposed Resolution
3. Goods and Services Agreement
4. Quote, Romtec Sierra™ Restroom Facility Model 2014 Sierra II Compact CMU Building Kit
Package Specifications, and Restroom Illustration
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The total purchase ofthe restroom ($40,985.52) is
funded in the 2008 Parks Capital Improvement Plan.
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Resolution No. 3 D (Q 5 authorizing a sole source
purchase of a pre-engineered restroom package for Blueberry Park and further authorizing the Mayor
to finalize and execute an agreement with Romtec, Inc. for the purchase of the restroom building
package with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
Wyn.Birkenthal@
ci.bremerton. wa.us
PARKS AND RECREATION
Parks Director I Wyn Birkenthal
Tel 360-473-5752
Fax 360-473-5882
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 20, 2008
To: Bremerton City Council
From: Wyn Birkenthal, Parks Director
Subject: Sole Source Purchase of Restroom Building Package from Romtec, Inc.
Romtec is the only pre-engineered site built restroom company in the country that provide complete
building packages with the ability to customize the facility to meet the functional needs and aesthetic
character of the site. They are the only package supplier that offers flexible design capabilities such as
custom siding options and variations in floor plan and elevations. Using Romtec's pre-engineered restroom
process cuts months off of the typical design process since they can easily make modifications to already
prepared floor plans and add custom items such as customer specified fixtures or exteriors. This allows
Romtec to have a complete restroom package prepared and ready to build on site in about 6 weeks. In a
normal design process (in which the customer hires an architect and engineer to design a restroom facility),
the customer may not even get a preliminary plan from the architect in that amount of time and would pay
up to 30k more in design fees.
In short, by using Romtec's efficiencies developed over 20 years in the park restroom business, the City gets
the benefits of a customized restroom package in a timely manner while also saving money on
architectural/engineering services required in a typical customized design approach.
Brief description of building package:
Double plumbed restroom with floor plan dimensions of 12'-8" x 8'-8" meeting all ADA requirements.
Exterior consists of a wood siding package. steel tI-amed windows, heavy duty stL:el doors, kick-proof steel
wall vents and an insulated 4: 12 pitch roof with dark green metal roofing and a 6' roof extension. Interior
includes a graffiti-proof FRP interior finish and stainless plumbing fixtures.
RESOLUTION NO. 30 ~ 5'
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremelion, Washington waiving the public bidding requirements
and authorizing the Mayor sign a contract with ROMTEC for the
purchase of a restroom facility to be placed at Blueberry Park.
WHEREAS, the purchase of a restroom for Blueberry Park is part of the
Blueberry Park improvements funded by State and Federal grants; and
WHEREAS, Romtec is the only pre-engineered site built restroom company in
the country that provides complete building packages with the ability to customize the facility to
meet the functional needs and aesthetic character of the site; and
WHEREAS, Romtec is the only package supplier that offers flexible design
capabilities such as custom siding options and variations in floor plan and elevations; and
WHEREAS, using Romtec's pre-engineered restroom process cuts months off of
the typical design process since they can easily make modifications to already prepared floor
plans and add custom items such as customer specified fixtures or exteriors; and
WHEREAS, RCW 39.04.280(1)(a) specifically authorizes a municipality to
waive competitive bidding requirements for purchases that are clearly and legitimately limited to
a single source of supply; NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the purchase of the Romtec restroom facility for Blueberry
Park is clearly and legitimately limited to a single source of supply.
SECTION 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign a contract with
Romtec for the purchase of a restroom facility to be placed at Blueberry Park.
SECTION 3. Competitive bidding requirements are hereby waived and are not
required for securing contracts for materials, goods, equipment and services necessary to
purchase the restroom referenced in this resolution.
SECTION 4. Severabilitv. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect. .
1
Blueberry Park Restroom Facilities
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED by the City Council ofthe City of Bremerton, Washington this _ day of June, 2008.
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
CAROL ETGEN, City Clerk
R:\Legal\Legal\Resolutions\Parks\Blueberry Park Restroom Facilities.doc
2
Blueberry Park Restroom Facilities
Date:
Job:
romtee com R:L\MTEC 18240 North Bank Rd, Roseburg, OR 97470
mmtec.com 541-496-3541 fax: 541-496-0803
""".~,~r'
06/02/08 GOVERNMENT QUOTATION - Building Package Only
Blueberry Park I
CITY OF BREMERTON PARKS & RECREATION
COLETTE BERNA
680 LEBO BLVD.
BREMERTON
IWA I Zip: 98310
360-473-5429
360-473-5882
: colette.berna@cLbremerton.wa.us
I
QUOTE #IR2-40804088
www.
info(i'.D
Agencyl Owner:
:;ontractor:
Contact:
Address:
City:
State:
Phone:
Fax:
Mobile
ArchitecU
Engineer:
Contact:
Address:
City:
State - Zip:
Phone:
Fax:
Mobile:
E-mail E-mail:
Project Location:
TERMS-GOVERNMENT: Net 35-day from date of shipment. TERMS-CONTRACTOR: Romtec Fast-Pay Discount offered with pre-payment 7 days prior to shipping
with ChecklVisa/Mastercard/American Express or COD-Certified Funds (Credit Card Limit up to $20,000 only). Net 35-day terms may be considered with approved
payment bond and credit approval by Romtec accounting department. Romtec Fast.pay Discount is not available with net 35-day terms.
Quantity Model Description Comm. Price Extension
1 2014 Sierra II Compact Double Restroom Kit Package $19,353 $19,353.0C
Custom
, '''10/' ";g;. "JItU . Roofing: Dark Green metal, specified by customer. Exterior:split face concrete, unless otherwise specified. y,~r .~;. ''M' "'~
~i0ti.~.: ,; *.,~: '. . , ~. '1~
1 -B Stainless Plumbing Fixture Pkg - S2(w/floor mount toilets) $4,389.00 $4,389.00
1 SP Siding Package (bottom 3'-4" lap 1 top 4'-8" board & batt) $2,192.37 $2,192.37
1 RE 6' Roof Extension $12,211 $12,210.91
SUBTOTAL $38,145.28
GOVERNMENT DISCOUNT: Available to state, county, city and other agencies. Requires purchase order placed by agency to -$1,907.26
Romtec. NOTE: Discount available to contractor through Romtec Fast-Pay Terms (pre-payment or COD certified funds).
Structural Engineering Fee I $1,850.00 $1,850.00
Shipping & Handling From Roseburg, OR to: Bremerton, WA I Zip Code:1 $2,897.50
TOTAL $40,985.52
A COMPLETE SET OF STAMPED PLANS, INCLUDING FOOTING & FOUNDATION DETAILS, IS INCLUDED WITH BUILDING PURCHASE,
NOTE: PANEL SCHEDULES & ENERGY CALC'S WILL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL FEES
1* SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
* All prices listed above are F.O.B. Roseburg, OR, freight prepaid and added.
. This quote is effective for 90 days from above date; thereafter all prices are subject to change without notice.
. There is 15% restocking fee on all returned items.
· This quotation is subject to the terms and conditions listed on the second sheet of this form (Click Terms tab below).
Kelly Hink
Authorized Signature
6/2/2008
Date
2nd Revised Quote 2014 Custom 06-02 -08KH.xls
Page 1 of 1
Page 10fB
Ri';"';;~~':'\MTEC
( JJ
\<~ ' "',f
_'''~''~~''''~: ., ,~'" f
ROMTEC SIERRA ™ RESTROOM FACILITY
Model: 2014 - SIERRA II COMPACT CMU BUILDING KIT PACKAGE
Project:
Floor Plan Dimensions: 12'-8" X 8'-8" Plan Set #:
Revision:
Rev Date:
Includes all standard items for this building model and the following additional items:
China Plumbing Fixture Package with floor mount toilets, Accessory package.
MATERIALS SPECIFICATION
PART I-GENERAL
DESCRIPTION
This section includes all materials and labor required in the placement and erection of the Romtec
Sierra™ Concrete Restroom Facility with china plumbing fixtures. Generally, work will include:
site preparation and grading, excavations for structures, backfill or structural backfill, foundation and
pad construction and building construction.
APPROVED MANUFACTURERS
This specification is based on the Sierra Restroom Facility Model: 2016 - SIERRA II COMPACT
CMU BUILDING PACKAGE as manufactured by:
Romtec, Inc., 18240 North Bank Road, Roseburg, OR 97470
Phone: 541-496-3541; Fax: 541-496-0803; E-mail: romtecl@romtec.com
cg 2008 Romtec, Inc. All Rights Reserved. These plans and drawings may be not reproduced,
adapted, or further distributed, and no buildings may be constructed from these plans, without the
written permission of Romtec, Inc.
Any building proposed as an equal shall be submitted to the owner no later than ten (10) days prior
to the bid date and must receive written approval from the owner. Otherwise, any alternate other than
a Romtec building will not be considered. Pre-fabricated modular or pre-cast buildings are not
acceptable.
CODE COMPLIANCE AND STANDARDS
All work and materials shall comply with the latest industry building codes and regulations.
DESIGN CRITERIA
Design shall meet the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).
SPEC-2014 Sierra /I Compact NOT- T-24
FOR. BASED ON:
Created:
Revised:
Page 2 of 8
WARRANTY
The Romtec building and all its associated components shall be warranted against defects in
materials and workmanship for a period of not less than one year from date of final acceptance.
PART II - PRODUCTS
FACTORY SUPPLIED ITEMS PER BUILDING:
IMPORTANT: Refer to plans for quantities, dimensions, locations and installation methods for the
materials and items described in this section.
Note: Romtec reserves the right to make substitutions of equivalent materials and items without
notice.
Concrete Masonry Units - CMU (supplied by Romtec)
Walls are constructed of8"W x 16"L x 8"H dry stack interlocking concrete masonry units (concrete
blocks), manufactured to ASTM C90-02 designation for load bearing concrete masonry units,
compressive strength = fm = 1500 psi. Wall construction has #5 Rebar Horizontal @32" o.c., w (2)
#4's @ top course (spread) and #4 Rebar Vertical @32" o.c. wi (2) #4's (in one cell ea. face) @
doors & corners (see Installer Supplied Items-Rebar in Walls). Walls are fully grouted with 2500 psi
concrete. Blocks are brown in color and have a split-face exterior surface and smooth interior
surface.
1. Mortar Additive
Horn Hydratite@ Plus shall be mixed with mortar (supplied by installer) in a continuous bed
for the first course of blocks. This material provides a watertight seal at the base of the walls.
2. Wall Sealant
Tamms Tamoseal@ cement based waterproofing finish shall be mixed (by installer) with
Tamms Akkro@ -7T liquid bonding admixture for application to the inside surface of all
exterior block walls. This material seals the pores and voids in the wall surface.
Interior Wall Finish (supplied by Romtec)
GlasteeFM FRP (fiberglass reinforced panels), Series 1200 (.090" thick). To be applied (by installer)
to interior surfaces of all walls (except mechanical rooms). White panels are supplied with matching
PVC trim and silicone caulk. Panels shall be applied with Henry's 117 FRP adhesive and white
nylon mushroom head expansion anchors (114" xl") with nylon pin for application 16" each way.
Note: Interior surfaces of some walls (i.e. mechanical room walls) may not have FRP finish. Refer to
final plans for details.
Prefabricated Structural Insulated Panels (supplied by Romtec)
Roof panels are prefabricated, structural, insulated panels. Interior and exterior sheathing is 7/16"
Structural II OSB. Insulation is 5 12" - R-23. Panels include all necessary hardware and fasteners for
installation on building walls.
1. Vaulted Ceiling Finish
Interior vaulted ceiling surfaces and exposed eaves and gable overhangs are pre-finished with
white FRP (fiberglass reinforced panels), .090" thick. FRP is pre-installed with Henry's 117
FRP adhesive. FRP trim is white PVe. Roof panel trim is 22-gauge white galvanized steel.
Includes fasteners for FRP.
SPEC-2014 Sierra" Compact NOT-T-24
FOR: BASED ON.
Created:
Revised:
Page 3 of 8
Roofing-Metal (supplied by Romtec)
Fabral Delta-Rib, 29-ga. steel roofing, with 24" coverage width. Choice of roofing color; standard
color is dark brown. Roofing package includes inside and outside foam closures, matching trim
(eaves, gables and ridge) and fasteners, sheet metal flashing (all sides), foam closure strips and 30#
roll roofing (under metal).
WV-I, Wall Vent, kick resistant for CMU wall (supplied by Romtec)
Pre-assembled lI8" black steel frame and heavy-duty expanded steel mesh welded to both sides of a
galvanized louvered vent with integral insect screen. Dimensions: 16" x 24" x 7" o.d., 12-" x 18" x
2" i.d. free area: 100 sq. in. Finish: powder-coated, black.
GW-I, Gable Window, steel frame (supplied by Romtec)
Gable window consists ofa pre-installed translucent (obscure) Lexan@ acrylic panel, )4" thick, in a
triangular steel frame. Frames are fabricated from 2" x 2" x 1/8" thick angle steel, double sided.
Frame finish is powder coated, black. Window is supplied with all necessary fasteners for
connection to building walls and roof panel.
1. Window Fasteners
Refer to drawings and/or manuals for quantities, locations and spacing of window
fasteners.
DO-I, Man Door, Steel 3'-0" x 7'-0" for concrete wall (supplied by Romtec)
Steelcraft@ Ll8-Series Flush Door with honeycomb core. Material is 18-ga. galvanized steel (14-ga.
top and bottom channels). Finish is powder coated, black. A stainless steel kick plate is preinstalled
at the bottom of the interior surface of the door. Door dimensions are 36" x 84" x 1-3/4". Available
with left or right swing.
1. Door Frame for 3'-0" x 7'-0" door for concrete wall
Steelcraft@ Fl6-Series 3-Sided Flush Frame, pre-welded. Material is 16-ga. galvanized steel.
Finish is powder coated, black. Frame dimensions are: 2" jamb width, 4" header height, and
7-3/4" jamb thickness. Doorframe is grouted into walls during installation.
2. Door Clips for Door Frame
Masonry door clips (3/16" diam.) are fitted between the doorframe and concrete blocks to
bond frame to wall. Door clips allow full internal grouting of the frame during installation.
3. Door Hinges
Bommer LB431OC-450J-652 adjustable spring hinge (top and bottom). LB8093-450lJ-652
standard hinge (middle). Made with non-corrosive lubricated bearings. Finish is Satin
Chrome with rust resistant coated steel. Kit is provided with stainless steel screws and pins
on standard hinge and stainless steel screws and knobs (top and bottom) on spring hinge.
4. Cylinder Deadlock-Dormitory (single user doors)
Falcon Lock D841 Cylinder Deadlock with Thumb-Turn. Installation on-site with supplied
hardware. Deadlock and hardware are zinc plated. Locks or unlocks by key from outside.
Unlocked by thumb-turn on the inside. Canhot be locked from the inside.
5. Pull Plate & Handle
Trimco 1017-3B Pull Plate and 1194-2 Handle. Pull plate is preinstalled on door. Handle is
installed on site. With supplied hardware. Pull plate and handle are stainless steel.
SPEC-2014 Sierra /I Compact NOT- T-24
FOR: BASED ON:
Created:
Revised:
Page 4 of 8
WC-I, Toilet, Floor Mount China, ADA Compliant (supplied by Romtec)
Crane 1.5 Hymont 3H-701E Water Closet. White vitreous china, low consumption (1.5 gal. per
flush), with elongated rim. 17-1/4" high at rim. Siphon action, 1-1/2" top spud.
1. Toilet Seat
Beneke 523 Open end plastic seat for elongated bowl. Seat is injection molded of high
strength, impact and chemical resistant polypropylene, matching check hinges have integrally
molded, stainless steel posts fitted with stainless steel washers and nuts, Perma-Bumper
feature provides integrally molded bumpers that are permanent, sanitary and easy to clean,
white.
2. Flush Valve, toilet
Royal 111 Exposed Closet Flushometer for 1-1/2" top spud bowl.
3. Fasteners for Toilet Fixtures (supplied by Romtec)
All necessary zinc-plated steel fasteners for attaching plumbing fixtures to walls, and floors.
LV-I, Lavatory, ADA Compliant, without backsplash (supplied by Romtec)
Crane Westmont 1-318- V Wall Hung Lavatory. White vitreous china, 19"W x 17"D.
1. Faucet
Chicago 333-665 Metering Single Faucet with push control handle and aerator
2. Offset Grid Strainer and P-trap, for lavatory
Dearborn 760W Strainer, Dearborn 701 P-trap, 1-1/4", 17-ga.
3. Protective Pipe Cover
ADA-conforming, wheelchair accessible lavatory P-trap and angle valve assemblied shall be
covered with the molded, anti-microbial TRUEBRO, INC. LA V GUARD undersink
protective pipe cover Model #101, Accessory #105K, China White. Cover shall be secured
with Snap-Clip flush reusable fasteners, angle stop shall have Lock-Lid locking access cover.
4. Fasteners for Lavatory Fixtures
All necessary zinc-plated steel fasteners for attaching plumbing fixtures to walls, and floors.
HB-l, Wall Hydrant, exterior application (supplied by Romtec)
Woodford 67P Freeze less Hydrant, automatic draining with anti-siphon vacuum breaker, for W'
copper pipe. Depth to match wall thickness.
GB-I, Grab Bars (supplied by Romtec)
Brey-Krause Mfg. Co D-7816-SS and D-7815-SS, Stainless Steel Grab Bars, 36" & 42"L, 14-ga,
satin finish, 1 12" o.d 22 ga. round snap-on concealed mount
MR-I, Mirror (supplied by Romtec)
Brey-Krause Mfg. Co.T-1024-30-SS 18 ga. Satin Finish, 24"W x 30"H.
SPEC-2014 Sierra" Compact NOT-T-24
FOR: BASED ON'
Created:
Revised:
Page 5 of 8
TP-l, Toilet Paper Dispenser-2-roll, white painted steel (supplied by Romtec)
Aslin Lockable Dispenser, two-roll, 1/4" steel, 13" long, lockable (padlock not included). Finish:
white painted steel. Available configurations include: free-rolling with 1" narrow bar, restricted-
rolling with 1" narrow bar and friction sleeve, no-roll with 2" wide bar. Required fasteners (six) to be
supplied by installer.
SI-l, Signs (supplied by Romtec)
Restroom entry signs shall be fastened to exterior walls alongside entry doors to meet ADA
requirements. Graphics and Grade 2 Braille on injection molded plastic signs, gray color, Womens-
. #8489, Men's # 8490, Unisex # Dimensions: 8" W x 8" H x 1/8" thickness.
SC-l, Seat Cover Dispenser (supplied by Romtec)
Bradley 583 Seat Cover Dispenser. Surface mounted, satin finish stainless steel, 500 capacity.
ND-l, Napkin/Tampon Disposal Dispenser- (supplied by Romtec)
Bradley 4722-15 napkin-tampon disposal, surface mounted, satin finish stainless steel,
Single end compartment.
PT-l, Paper Towel Dispenser- (supplied by Romtec)
Bradley 251-33 paper towel dispenser, surface mounted, single-fold towels, white enamel finish.
WR-l, Waste Receptacle (supplied by Romtec)
Bradley 377-38 36-gallon waste receptacle. Fabricated of heavy gauge stainless steel with exposed
surfaces in architectural stain finish. Equipped with vinyl wall bumper strip and rubber feet. Top
fabricated of heavy gauge stainless steel. Swing door is counter balanced for easy operation.
SD-l, Soap Dispenser (supplied by Romtec)
Bradley 6562 Soap Dispenser. Tank type-vertical surface mounted, push-in corrosion resistant
liquid soap valve. Finish: stainless steel.
INSTALLER SUPPLIED ITEMS - ROMTEC IS NOT INSTALLING
The following items are to be supplied by the building installer. Refer to drawings for quantities,
dimensions, locations and installation methods for items described in this section. The installer shall
supply any parts not listed above in Factory Supplied Items Per Building, including but not limited
to items specified in the final plans and items required by building codes. The installer shall be
responsible for ensuring that the concrete foundation and slab are adequate for the site conditions
and the purpose for which the building and foundation/slab are intended.
Equipment, Labor and Trades (supplied by installer)
All equipment, labor and trades to unload the building, excavate the site, build concrete forms,
supply and install the reinforced concrete footings and slab, and install the building and fixtures.
Engineered Fill (supplied by installer)
3/4" minus crushed rock engineered fill around footing, foundation and slab as required.
Slab Vapor Barrier (supplied by installer)
6 mil. continuous vapor barrier under concrete slab.
SPEC-2014 Sierra" Compact NOT- T-24
FOR. BASED ON:
Created:
Revised:
Page 6 of 8
Concrete Foundation/Footing, Interior Slabs and Exterior/Entry Slabs (supplied by installer)
2500 psi ready-mix concrete to dimensions specified in final plans. Steel rebar to be supplied by
installer as specified in final plans.
Concrete Slab Sealer (supplied by installer)
Sonneborn Sonocrete Kure 1315 water-base transparent curing, sealing and dust proofing compound
or equivalent. Two (2) coats to be applied per manufacturer's instructions by installer.
Mortar Bed for First Course of Blocks (supplied by installer)
Mixed with Hydratite@ Plus mortar additive (supplied by Romtec). Mortar supplied by installer.
Concrete Grout in Walls (supplied by installer)
2500 psi ready-mix concrete pumped into stacked wall blocks, approx. 1 cubic yd. per 100 blocks.
Rebar in Walls (supplied by installer)
All walls have #5 Rebar Horizontal @32" O.c., w (2) #4's @ top course (spread) and #4 Rebar
Vertical @32" O.c. w/ (2) #4's (in one cell ea. Face) @ doors & comers
Sidewalks (supplied by installer)
2500 psi broom finish 4' sidewalk with control joints per local code, with remesh 6 x 6 x 10.
Plumbing Rough-in (supplied by installer)
All underground water service to building as specified in final site plan. (Note: minimum water
pressure at toilet and urinal flush valves (11/2" inlet pipe) shall be 50 psi.)
All floor drains as shown on final plans.
All underground sewer drain(s) from building as specified in final site plan.
Building water shutoff valve and drain and all rough piping as shown on final plans.
Plumbing Installation and Trim (supplied by installer)
Supplied fixtures as specified in final plans. (Note: supply and install fasteners and trim for fixtures
as required.)
Plumbing NOTE: (IF APPLICABLE)
Hot water tanks require a pressure relief valve (included when hot water package is part of
Romtec's supplied items) and drain line (installer supplied) to the exterior of the building per UPC,
Section 608.4. Hot water tanks require two straps per UPC, Section 510.5. (installer supplied)
NOTE: Textured cane detectable area around drinkin2: fountain may be reQuired to meet
ADA standards. An area 33" x 48" extends 12" out from fountain in front and on both sides.
FD-l, Floor Drain (supplied by installer)
Smith 2005, duco cast iron body with flashing collar and adjustable strainer. (unless owner specifies
otherwise)
Electrical Rough-in (supplied by installer)
All underground and/or overhead service to building as specified in final site plan.
SPEC-2014 Sierra /I Compact NOT- T-24
FOR: BASED ON:
Created:
Revised:
Page 7 of 8
Electric meter base and all rough wiring, conduit, switches, plugs and circuit breakers as shown on
final plans. (Note: Romtec does not supply the meter base. Romtec-supplied breaker panel includes
main breaker only. Branch circuit breakers are not supplied by Romtec.)
Electrical Installation and Trim (supplied by installer)
Supplied fixtures as specified in final plans. Note: supply and install fasteners and trim for fixtures
as required.) Provide #4 bare copper ground wire per NEC 250 and approved connectors per plans.
CB-I, Branch Circuit Breakers (supplied by installer)
Cutler Hammer BR Type-Single Phase-Single Pole (or equivalent)
SW-I, Switch (supplied by installer) (if needed)
Leviton 1221-21 quiet wall switch, 15 amp/120 volt, Ivory colored with cover plate (or equivalent)
EO-I, GFCI Outlets (supplied by installer) (if needed)
Pass & Seymour/Legrand 1594, Straight Blade Duplex GFCI Receptacles, 2 Pole, 3 wire grounding,
UL Listed. With SafeLock Protection and a trip-indicator light.
Weatherproof Box & Cover (supplied by installer)
Mortared -in- application, 4600 Pass & Seymour Legrand 4600 Enclosure only, without mounting
plate, 4600-26P Mounting Plate for Decorator/ GFCI, 4609 Key for Enclosure
ELECTRICA'b"FIXTURE PAtKAGE~ Supplied by~taller
As specified by owner.
Drinking Fountain Guardrail (supplied by installer) - where applicable-optional
Installer to supply and install:
Guardrails as specified by State or Owner
Other (supplied by installer)
The building installer is responsible for supply and installation of all other items indicated on final
plans or required by building codes, which are not supplied by Romtec.
Special Inspection (supplied by owner, not by ROMTEC) if required:
If Special Inspection, as defined by Code, is required per the Building Department or other
regulatory agencies, then Romtec can assist but NOT provide this service. Romtec can endorse an
owner furnished special inspector or special inspection company in order to facilitate the
permitting process. In order for Romtec to endorse the proposed special inspector, documentation
such as previous experience, resume's and references, etc. shall be requested by Romtec in order to
endorse their services. Romtec, under no circumstance shall be considered the special
Inspector, nor shall they pay any fees associated with such. All such required costs, fees and
arrangements associated with these are the responsibility of the owner.
ITEMS NOT SUPPLIED BY ROMTEC OR INSTALLER
The following items are to be supplied by others. This could be the owner, landscapers, or other site
workers. This also includes any items not listed above or in the plans, that are not listed as being
supplied by either Romtec or the Installer.
SPEC-2014 Sierra /I Compact NOT-T-24
FOR: BASED ON:
Created:
Revised:
Page 8 of 8
Relocation and installation of existing utilities per written specification to be supplied by
owner.
:E:Xt~l:ioi{Concrete silt.
,,:; :~," , c '~ -
quotapon as supplied ~
Exterlorconcrete side
pad~between building'
gra~el; concrete pad 0
sid~al}{s. shall have i..
atiJ1,Illding~:Ii~rimei~f(suppli~dby oth~ts unlesls}i~af!..~d in
aIler) .
~'at bu~l~Ff!; pe~eter (n!~incluciiig steel"t;~!orced d~~r4~1C9ncr~te
s) to cOI!~lSt of: .s~~~grade'of 2'" de~.sand. J~g base. over 6'.fl1eep,
'ok 25.00 p.s.i'~ncrete . #3 (318") reb 8':each way. Concrete
wi! . r ". ,.... . ,
deep sg.wcutS,!:~~o;c; all:expansigpjoinf .b.e.
$ . ~.
Bac~~}V CheckValv~{lt~other~ . . i! f(' ," . 'v
Sewtf:r;Jllle backflow c%€%::valve to he supp't~ed,.by $ers.
DraillA V~lve (by 0 .
Water~ine drain valv
"iF . ',' '. 'n:' ',,',
. .l?~:sllPplied by otlf~rg,
aterials andEqd
wing items at\~I"!
final p lans:/ .
.omtec orlnst
. ~ntrNPtSu.~ ;
, er i!en;ls not
ideih~ scoP.
"<:Romt!c or Inst~l",~
or 'pecifi~~i()tl, })r not .,
,Jfica 1!a~#:X.it)ot sUPPtiedjr
'. ." ......
'ressi9i\,Equipmc,t ..
tach~~t~ the bUij({in~;.. . . . ~'.
ludeCi,tn the M:atenarS~~eclfic~ti()n
clud~in the "terial~~;g~cificltfub
SPEC-2014 Sierra" Compact NOT-T-24
FOR: BASED ON:
Created:
Revised:
GOODS AND SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is entered into between the City of Bremerton, a Washington Municipal Corporation ("City"), and Glass
Romtec Inc. ("Vendor"), whose mailing address is: 18240 North Bank Rd., Roseburg, OR 97470.
The parties agree as follows:
1. VENDOR SERVICES. The Vendor shall provide the following goods and materials and/or perform the following services for the
City: Pre-engineered Restroom Package for Blueberry Park
2. TIME OF COMPLETION. Vendor shall complete the work and provide all goods, materials and services within 30 calendar
days from the date all parties have signed this Agreement.
3. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Vendor the total amount of$40,985 .52 including applicable Washington State Sales
Tax, for the goods, materials and services contemplated in this Agreement. The City shall pay the Vendor the following amounts according
to the following schedule: Lump sum 35 davs from date of shipment.
A. Defective or Unauthorized Work. The City reserves its right to withhold payment from Vendor for any defective or
unauthorized goods, materials or services. If Vendor is unable, for any reason, to complete any part of this Agreement,
the City may obtain the goods, materials or services by Agreement or otherwise, and Vendor shall be liable to the City
for any additional costs incurred by the City. "Additional costs" shall mean all reasonable costs, including legal costs and
attorney fees, incurred by the City beyond the maximum Agreement price specified above. The City further reserves its
right to deduct the cost to complete this Agreement, including any Additional Costs, from any and all amounts due or to
become due the Vendor.
4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall be at all times acting as an independent contractor and not as an
employee of the City. The Contractor shall secure at its expense, and shall be responsible for all payments of income tax, social security,
state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation, and all other payroll deductions for the Contractor, officer, agents,
employees and sub-contractors. The Contractor shall also secure all applicable business licenses, if required, in connection with the contract
services, including all required licenses for Contractor's officers, agents, employees and sub-contractors.
5. TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Agreement for good cause. "Good cause" shall include, without limitation, any
one or more of the following events:
A. The Vendor's refusal or failure to supply a sufficient number of properly skilled workers or proper materials for
completion of this Agreement.
B. The Vendor's failure to complete this Agreement within the time specified in this Agreement.
C. The Vendor's failure to make full and prompt payment to subcontractors or for material or labor.
D. The Vendor's failure to complete with federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations.
E. The Vendor's filing for bankruptcy or becoming adjudged bankrupt.
If the City terminates this Agreement for good cause, the Vendor shall not receive any further monies due under this Agreement
until the goods, materials and services required by this Agreement are completed and fully performed.
6. CHANGES. The City may issue a written change order for any change in the goods, materials or services to be provided during
the performance of this Agreement. If the Vendor determines, for any reason, that a change order is necessary, Vendor must submit a
written change order request to an authorized agent of the City within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date Vendor knew or should have
known of the facts and events giving rise to the requested change. If the City detennines that the change increases or decreases the Vendor's
costs or time for performance, the City will make an equitable adjustment. The City will attempt, in good faith, to reach agreement with the
Vendor on all equitable adjustments. However, if the parties are unable to agree, the City will determine the equitable adjustment as it
deems appropriate. The Vendor shall proceed with the change order work upon receiving either a written change order from the City or an
oral order from the City before actually receiving the written change order. If the Vendor fails to require a change order within the time
allowed, the Vendor waives its right to make any claim or submit subsequent change order requests for that portion of the contract work. If
the Vendor disagrees with the equitable adjustment the Vendor must complete the change order work; however, the Vendor may elect to
protest the adjustment as provided below:
A. Procedure and Protest bv the Vendor. If the Vendor disagrees with anything required by a change order, another written
order, or an oral order from the City, including any direction, instruction, interpretation, or determination by the City, the
Vendor shall:
1. Immediately give a signed written notice of protest to the City;
2. Supplement the written protest within fourteen (14) calendar days with a written statement that provides the
following information:
a. The date of the Vendor's protest.
b. The nature and circumstances that caused the protest.
c. The provisions in this Agreement that support the protest.
d. The estimated dollar cost, if any, of the protested work and how that estimate was determined.
e. An analysis of the progress schedule showing the schedule change or disruption if the Vendor is
asserting a schedule change or disruption.
3. The Vendor shall keep complete records of extra costs and time incurred as a result ofthe protested work. The
City shall have access to any of the Vendor's records needed for evaluating the protest.
The City will evaluate all protests, provided the procedures in this section are followed. If the City determines that a
protest is valid, the City will adjust payment for work or time by an equitable adjustment. No adjustment will be made
for an invalid protest.
B. Vendor's Dutv to Complete Protested Work. In spite of any protest, the Vendor shall proceed promptly to provide the
goods, materials and services required by the City under this Agreement.
C. Vendor's Acceptance of Changes. The Vendor accepts all requirements of a change order by: (1) endorsing it, (2)
writing a separate acceptance, or (3) not protesting in the way this section provides. A change order that is accepted by
Vendor as provided in this section shall constitute full payment and final settlement of all claims for contract ti~e and for
direct, indirect and consequential costs, including costs of delays related to any work, either covered or affected by the
change.
D. Failure to Protest Constitutes Waiver. By not protesting as this section provides, the Vendor also waives any additional
entitlement and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations, and
determination).
E. Failure to Follow Procedures Constitutes Waiver. By failing to follow the procedures of this section, the Vendor
completely waives any claims for protested work and accepts from the City any written or oral order (including
directions, instructions, interpretations, and determination).
7. CLAIMS. The Vendor shall give written notice to the City of all claims other than change orders within fourteen (14) calendar
days of the occurrence of the events giving rise to the claims. Any claim for damages, additional payment for any reason, or extension of
time, whether under this Agreement or otherwise, shall be conclusively deemed to have been waived by the Vendor unless a timely written
claim is made in strict accordance with the applicable provisions of this Agreement; or, if (and only if) no such provision is applicable,
unless that claim is set forth in detail in writing and received by the City within seven (7) calendar days from the date Vendor knew, or
should have known, of the facts giving rise to the claim. At a minimum, a Vendor's written claim must include the information set forth
regarding protests in Section 7(A)(2)(a)-(e).
FAILURE TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF CLAIM WITHIN THE TIME ALLOWED SHALL
BE AN ABSOLUTE WAIVER OF ANY CLAIMS ARISING IN ANY WAY FROM THE FACTS OR EVENTS SURROUNDING THAT
CLAIM OR CAUSED BY THAT DELAY.
Vendor must, in any event, file any claim or bring any suit arising from or connected with this Agreement within 120 calendar days
from the date the contract work is complete.
8. WARRANTY. The Vendor shall correct all defects in workmanship and materials within one year from the date of the City's
acceptance of the Contract work. When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for one year from the
date such correction is completed and accepted by the City. The Vendor shall begin to correct any defects within seven (7) calendar days of
its receipt of notice from the City of the defect. If the Vendor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time, the City may
complete the corrections and the Vendor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in order to accomplish the correction.
9. INDEMNIFICA nON. Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officer, officials, employees, agents and volunteers
harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in
connection with the performance of this Agreement. Vendor's obligation to indemnify shall not extend to that portion of damages caused by
the City's sole negligence.
The City's inspection or acceptance of any of V endor's work when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants
of indemnification.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event ofliability
for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the
Vendor and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Vendor's liability hereunder shall b~ only to the extent of
the Vendor's negligence.
IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS INDEMNIFICATION CONSTITUTES
THE CONSULTANT'S WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY FOR THE
PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED
THIS WAIVER.
The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
10. INSURANCE. The Vendor shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to
persons or damage to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Contract work by the Vendor, its agents,
representatives, employees or subcontractors.
Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Vendor shall provide a Certificate ofInsurance evidencing:
I. Automobile Liabilitv insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury
and property damage; and
2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined
single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage
shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property damage; and
employer's liability.
Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the Vendor.
All required policies shall be provided on an "occurrence" basis except professional liability insurance (if required), which shall be
provided on a "claims-made" basis.
The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability insurance policy, as respects work
performed by or on behalf of the Vendor and a copy of the endorsement naming the City as additional insured shall be attached to
the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of all the required insurance policies.
The Vendor's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating that coverage shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability.
The Vendor's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City shall be given thirty (30) days prior written
notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage.
The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time.and for any reason, proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate
of the insurance policy with all endorsements as evidence of coverage.
11. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. Licenses and Taxes. Vendor shall possess a current Bremerton Business License and any regulatory license required to
fulfill Vendor's obligations under this contract. B&O taxes shall be paid when due, and Vendor, by this agreement,
assigns any payments due under this contract to the City Clerk for payment of such. taxes which have been declared
delinquent.
B. Conflict and Precedence. In the event of a conflict between the contract documents, the document which rates higher on
the following list shall take precedence:
1. Addenda, if any,
2. Contract,
3. Specifications,
4. Terms and Conditions,
5. Contractor's proposal.
C. Documents Incorporated by Reference. The following documents are incorporated by reference, to include, but not be
limited to:
1. Terms and Conditions,
2. Specifications,
3. Proposal, and
4. Non-Collusion Affidavit.
D. Nondiscrimination. In the hiring of employees for the performance of work under this Agreement the Vendor, its
subcontractors, or any person acting on behalf of Vendor shall not, by reason of race, religion, color, sex, sexual
orientation, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability, discriminate against any person
who is qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates.
E. Compliance with Laws. Vendor shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations throughout
every aspect in the performance of this Agreement.
F. Work Performed at Vendor's Risk. Vendor shall take all precautions necessary and shall be responsible for the safety of
its employees, agents, and subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement. All work shall be done at Vendor's own
risk, and Vendor shall be responsible for any loss of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in
connection with the work.
G. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington. If any dispute arises between the City and Vendor under any of the provisions of this Agreement, resolution
of that dispute shall be available exclusively under the jurisdiction, venue and rules ofthe Kitsap County Superior Court,
Kitsap County, Washington.
H. Attorney's Fees. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party
shall be responsible for payment of its own legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or
lawsuit; however, nothing in this subsection shall limit the City's right to indemnification under Section 9 of this
Agreement.
1. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed below,
unless otherwise notified. Any written notice shall become effective upon delivery, but in any event three (3) calendar
days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the
addressee at the address stated in this Agreement.
Notices to be sent to:
Notices to be sent to:
VENDOR:
CITY:
Attn: Lem James
Romtec Inc.
18240 North Bank Road
Roseburg, OR 97470
Attn: Colette Bema, Park Development Planner
City of Bremerton, Parks & Recreation Dept.
680 Lebo Blvd.
Bremerton, WA. 98337
1. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by the Vendor without the written consent of the City shall be void.
K. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any ofthe provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in
writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Vendor.
L. Severability. If anyone or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this Agreement are held to be unconstitutional or
invalid, that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement and the remainder shall
remain in full force and effect.
M. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any attached Exhibits, supersede
all prior verbal statements by any representative of the City, and those statements shall not be construed as forming a part
of or altering in any manner this Agreement. This Agreement and any attached Exhibits contain the entire Agreement
between the parties. Should any language in any Exhibit to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this
Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties below have executed this Agreement.
VENDOR:
CITY:
City of Bremerton
By:
Print Name:
Its:
Date:
By:
Print Name:
Its:
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Bremerton City Attorney
ATTEST:
By:
City Clerk
5C-
Move to authorize the expenditure of an additional $9,000 froll1 the
Stomlwater Operations Budget to pay for legal services for the
NPDES II Permit appeal.
($'AI308 -l(2)
---.....,