HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/19/2007 AGENDA
FILE
CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA. 98337-1873 0 (360) 473-5280
*** AMENOEO***
SEPTEMBER 19, 2007
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603
A. General Council Business
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. in CHAMBERS LOCATED ON FIRST FLOOR
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation
3. MAYOR'S REPORT
4. PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS
5. CONSENT' AGENOA
A. Claims & Check Register (#AB07-218)
B. Minutes of Meeting - September 5,2007 (#AB07-219)
C. Minutes of Meeting - September 12,2007 (#AS07-220)
D. Justice-Assistance Grant for 2007 (#AB07-221)
E. Professional Service Agreement with RH2 Engineers for 2008 Water Main Improvements
(#AB07 -222)
F. Renewal of Annual Funding Commitment to Admiral Theater Foundation (#AB07 -223)
6. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Ordinance No. 5023, amending Chapter 11.02 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to
"Right-of-Way Use" (#AB07-224)
B. Agreed Order with Washington Department of Ecology regarding former Chevron Property
(#AB07 -225)
7. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
8. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
9. STUDY SESSION - The Council will reconvene in the 6th Floor Council Conference Room for
a 30-Minute Study Session to discuss 'TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICTS"
fI Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special
accommodations should contact the City Clerk's Office at (360) 473-5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the
Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SPEAKERS LIST
PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION FROM THE CITY OF
BREMERTON MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING.
THANK yOU.
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME BELOW IF YOU PLAN TO
SPEAK DURING THE COUNCIL MEETING TONIGHT
f)ff"~,(! ~V~ k~ "r-cSCAfJ T7~ CC S-Ad~ I~, . !/-ssCJC(C{(
I
DATE SUBMITTED: BILL # () 7 - ~ / i
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON 5 A
CITY COUNCIL
........................................................................................
SUBJECT:
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 19,2007
Department: Financial Services
Presenter: Cathy Johnson
Phone: 473-5296
SUMMARY: Consent Agenda item. Approval of payroll, checks and electronic fund transfe~.
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
CONSENT AGENDA
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Approve
1) Check #'s 319556 through 319664 and EFT's 7364 through 7373 in the amount of $724,314.32.
2) Payroll for Payout dated August 31,2007 in the amount of$521.50.
/'
COUNCIL ACTION: Q(Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
DATE SUBMITTED: 't / '~/o1
BILL #
07- ~ 1 q
AGENDA BILL '
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
56
.............................................................~.........................I
Committee Meeting Date: N/ A
COUNCIL MEETING Date: ~ ,<1 {~CJ7
Department: City Council
Presenter: Will Maupin,
Council President
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting held 5ep~ 5 J ~ D 7
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
for meeting of
5~wJc~ 5, ;J.oo7
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes for ~ 5', ~C>-,
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/A
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
Council President
N/A
N/A
N/A
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
N2
4(ft~r/~
CONSENT AGENDA [d'"
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, September 5,2007
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Chambers, of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER 345 6th Street, Bremerton, Washington,
Wednesday, September 5,2007, at 5:30 PM, with Council President Will Maupin presiding. Council
members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Mike Shepherd, Wendy
Priest, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Brad Gehring. Also present were City Attorney Roger
Lubovich; Deputy City Clerk Cherie Henry; and Council Assistant Christine Grenier.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Cecil McConnell followed by the invocation
provided by Pastor Rick Beaudry of Calvary Chapel.
President Maupin announced that a Pre-Council Session to discuss General Council Business was
held prior to the meeting.
MAYOR'S REPORT
. Announced that the State Legislative House Capital Budget Committee will be meeting on
October 9 at the Conference Center and added that this committee previously provided
millions of dollars in funding over the last few years for redevelopment; and
. Announced that the Prosperity Partnership group will be meeting in Bremerton on September
14 which has been instrumental in funding the Bremerton Marina improvements; and
. Announced that the Secretary of State, Sam Reed will be visiting Bremerton for a tour on
September 19; and
. Introduced Scott Alexander and Frank Horton who briefed the Council on their plan for the
future of the Gold Mountain Golf Course; provided information on the UW Husky Invitational
Tournament which will be held on October 1 and 2; the NCAA Regional Golf Tournament to be
held on May 14 to 17, 2008; and have submitted proposals for the Junior Amateur
Championship or Women's Championship scheduled for 2011 or 2012.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS
Adam Brockus invited the public to Manette Fest which will be this Saturday, September 8. Events
will include a pancake breakfast and fun run both starting at 9:00 AM; a children's play area and
vendor booths will open at 10:00 AM on 11th Street between Pitt Avenue and Perry Avenue; and
lastly, there will be a raffle at 3:00 PM.
Dianne Robinson thanked students Tonv Strickland; Aaron Smith; and Telaia Hall, and the rest of
the community who helped to make the Summer Reading Adventure Program a success.
Mike Walton, Marketing Director for YMCA, announced that the indoor soccer program will begin in
October and sign-ups are available during September; encouraged people to attend Manette Fest
and YMCA Member Appreciation Barbeque and Tour on Saturday, September 8; Military Date Night
was moved to September 8 from 5:30 to 9:30 PM; and there will be no swimming during Teen Late
Night or Splash and Jam this month due to the pool closure for maintenance.
Kurt Weist, Executive -Director of the Bremerton Housing Authority, provided information to Council
on a grant application for the Department of Housing and Urban Development - Hope 6 Program; and
invited the public to attend Community Meetingsto be held at 6:00 PM at the West Park Community
Center on September 6, September 20, and October 11.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Page 2 of 5
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Check Numbers 319114 through 319337; and EFT-7319 through EFT-7344 in the amount of
$1,608,955.25 for the period ending August 31,2007; Regular Payroll- Final Payment to the
Estate of Louis Dean Westcott in the amount of $7,232.30; and Retiree Payroll in the amount of
$76,919.13 for the pay period ending August 31,2007 (#AB07-203)
B. Minutes of Meeting - August 15, 2007 (#AB07 -204)
C. Minutes of Meeting - August 22, 2007 (#AB07 -205)
D. Contract Award to COATINGS UNLIMITED, INC. for Reservoir 18 Interior Coating Replacement
(#AB07 -206)
E. Contract Award to STAN PALMER CONSTRUCTION for Sewage Pump Station CW-1 Upgrade
(#AB07 -207)
F. Purchase of LED Dialight Components for Traffic Light Signal Systems (#AB07-208)
G. Appointment of Eric Anderson to the Bremerton Housing Authority Board of Commissioners
(#AB07-209)
H. Reappointment of Tina Marie Davis to the Community Development Block Grant Citizen Advisory
Committee (#AB07 -210)
I. Professional Services Agreement for School Resource Officer with Bremerton School District
(#AB07 -211 )
J. Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement with Kitsap Community Federal Credit Union (#AB07-
212)
K. Ordinance No. 5002 for 2007 Mid-Year Budget Adjustment (#AB07 -213)
05:57:39 M/S/C (Priest/Arends) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented.
Voted in favor of the motion: Gehring, McConnell, Priest, Shepherd, Robinson, Arends, Wofford,
Maupin
Abstained: Brockus
Motion carried; 8-Yes; 1-Abstention
GENERAL BUSINESS
6A - ARTIST CONTRACT WITH J.D. FRANCIS FOR COMMISSIONED ARTWORK FOR THE ART
MORKEN BUILDING (#AB07-214): Steve Priest, Chair of Arts Commission, summarized that on
May 16, 2007, the Bremerton Arts Commission presented to City Council J.D. Francis as an artist
selected to produce artwork to be installed at the Art Morken Law Enforcement Building located at
1025 Burwell Street and Council authorized the Commission to negotiate a Scope of Work and
finalize design. The artist's scope of work and contract have been completed and are being brought
forward for City Council approval. Mr. Priest added that of the13 applicants, 4 artists were
interviewed, and 2 artists were selected for this project; and thanked Steve Goupil for helping to
create the badge image as provided to Council.
Moselle Chirica commended the artists for their design; and requested an opportunity to provide her
proposals for institutional artwork for the proposed boardwalk and the fountain park.
Andrea Spencer, Community Development Director will add the artist's contact information to the
commission's database so that she will be included in future project discussions.
Mike Shepherd asked if the image will be the property of the City. Ms. Spencer answered yes.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Page 4 of 5
Will Maupin thanked Roger Lubovich for working hard to craft these agreements.
Brad GehrinQ was pleased with the contract.
Dianne Robinson asked what the length of the contract would be. Wvn Birkenthal answered three
years.
06:24:44 M/S/C/U (McConnell/Arends) Move approve the Golf Management Agreement, Food and
Beverage Agreement, and Lease between the City of Bremerton and Scott Alexander's Golf Pro
Shop, Inc. and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreements with substantially the
same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Brad GehrinQ commented on Blackberry Festival bands and events; and was pleased with the
public's enthusiasm.
Cecil McConnell encouraged people to drive safely especially in school zones.
Adam Brockus asked people to volunteer at the Naval Museum.
Wendy Priest thanked the Main Stream Association and the City for putting the Blackberry Festival
together.
Mike Shepherd commented on recent requests by citizens for speed humps; and indicated that
speed humps are not as effective as once thought and have been problematic to public safety
vehicles, and that Engineering staff will be considering other options to address residential speeding
problems.
Dianne Robinson was excited about the Kitsap SEED Project and potential job opportunities. People
may visit the website www.kitsapseed.orq for more information; had a great time at the Blackberry
Festival; and thanked Tracey Williams for sponsoring the 2nd Annual Community Carnival.
Carol Arends welcomed the USS Stennis; and announced that this Friday will be the First Friday
Artwalk.
Nick Wofford encouraged people to sign up for the electronic newsletters; and to contact the Parks
Department to help out with ivy removal work parties.
Will Maupin represented the City at the Blackberry Festival Opening Ceremony; and had met with
Captain Brad Johanson of the USS Stennis.
With no further business, President Maupin adjourned the Council Meeting at 6:39 PM
Prepared and Submitted by:
~c tlttU.;z.
CHRISTINE GRENIER
Council Assistant
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Page 5 of 5
Attest:
PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WM:PJ:ls:cg
DATE SUBMITTED: q/I'J-/o1
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMER TON
CITY COUNCIL
BILL # D 7 - ;).d-O
5C
........................................................................................
Committee Meeting Date: NI A
COUNCIL MEETING Date: ~lq ;1..007
Department: City Council J
Presenter: Will Maupin,
Council President
Phone: (360)473-5280
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting held S -er~ I ~I d-60 7
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
for meeting of
~1~, ~o7
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes for ~ 1:1..1 .:lc,c7
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/A
APPRO V ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
Council President
N/A
N/A
N/A
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
N~
. '/
-4t i~?~
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Chambers, of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER 345 6th Street, Bremerton,
Washington, Wednesday, September 12,2007, at 5:30 PM, with Council President Maupin
presiding. Council members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Mike
Shepherd, Wendy Priest, Adam Brockus, and Cecil McConnell. Council Member Brad Gehring
was absent. Also present were City Attorney Roger Lubovich; Deputy City Clerk Cherie Henry;
and Legislative Assistant Lori Smith.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Cecil McConnell followed by the
invocation provided by Council Member Dianne Robinson.
President Maupin announced that a Pre-Council Session was held prior to the meeting and
included a discussion on General Council Business; and a 10-minute Executive Session on
"Pending Litigation".
PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS
Helen Miller asked if the Photo Enforcement cameras were installed, and if so, at what locations.
Mike Mecham responded that the cameras have not yet been installed and are pending the
completion of a traffic study to determine the exact locations. At that time, the locations will
become public, signs will be installed; and also noted the first 30-days will be "warnings" only.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Check Numbers 319338 through 319555; and EFT-7345 through EFT-7363 in the amount of
$1,071,315.89; and Regular Payroll in the amount of $764,688.74 for the pay period ending
August 31,2007 (#AB07-217)
05:34:35 M/S/C/U (Priest/Wofford) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented.
With no further business, President Maupin adjourned the Council Meeting at 5:35 PM. The
Council reconvened in the 6tn Floor Council Conference Room for a STUDY SESSION to hear
presentations on upcoming items.
P:re~z~
L I SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest:
PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WM:PJ:ls:cg
DA TE SUBMITTED: August 29, 2007
BILL#
07- d-d-.-l
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
5])
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Justice Assistance Grant for
2007
Committee Meeting Date: September 12,2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 19, 2007
Department: Police
Presenter: Chief Rogers
Phone: 473-5224
SUMMARY: The City of Bremerton Police Department applied for an Edward Byrne Memorial
Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) that will allow the City to support a broad range of activities to
prevent and control crime based on our own local needs and conditions. The funds will be used to
purchase equipment and supplies to support the Police Department's interactive classroom training
system and 'Use-of-Force' training simulator. The grant is from the Department of Justice. No
matching funds are required. The total grant amount is $63,798.00. The grant duration is through
September 2010.
ATTACHMENTS: Applicable Grant A ward Documentation
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None. The JAG funding is a revenue source for
$63,798.00. The equipment purchases are in the 2008 budget and expended in 2008.
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
CONSENT AGENDA 1&
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve and accept the Justice Assistance Grant.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
Department of .Justice
Office of Justice Programs
Bureau of Justice i\>Sl,tanec
Office of Ju,tice Programs
lI'ill'fll!l;':'!ll/l, j) C _'0531
i\ugust 16, 2007
The Honorable Cary Bozeman
City of Bremerton
345 6th Street, Suite 600
Bremcrton, W A 98337
Dear Mayor Bozeman:
On behalf of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, it is my pleasure to inform you that the Office of Justice Programs has
approved your application for funding under the FY 07 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program in
the amount of $63,798 for City of Bremerton.
Enclosed you will find the Grant Award and Special Conditions documents. This award is subject to all administrative and
financial requirements, including the timely submission of all financial and programmatic reports, resolution of all interim
audit findings, and the maintenance of a minimum level of cash-on-hand. Should you not adhere to these requirements, you
will be in violation of the tern1S of this agreement and the award will be subject to tern1ination for cause or other administrative
action as appropriate.
If you have questions regarding this award, please contact:
Program Questions, Jeffrey S. Felten-Green, Program Manager at (202) 514-8874; and
Financial Questions, the Office of the Comptroller, Customer Service Center (CSC) at
(800) 458-0786, or you may contact the CSC at ask.oc@usdoj.gov.
Congratulations, and we look forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
tO/~
Domingo S. Herraiz
Director, Bureau of Justice Assistance
Enclosures
Department of Justice
Office DC Justice Programs
OITicc Cor Civil Rights
It 'JlJII/l,!!.III/l. /) C _'(/531
;\ugw,t 16,2007
The Honorablc Cary Bozcman
City of Brcmerton
345 6th Street, Suitc 600
Bremerton, W A 98337
Dear Mayor Bozeman:
Congratulation:> on your recent award. In establishing financial assistance programs, Congress linked the receipt
of Federal funding to compliance with Federal civil rights laws. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Office of
Justice Program:> (OJP), U.S. Department of Justice is responsible for ensuring that recipients of financial aid from
OJP, its component offices and bureaus, the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW), and the Office of
Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) comply with applicable Federal civil rights statutes and
regulations. We at OCR are available to help you and your organization meet the civil rights requirements that
come with Justice Department funding.
Ensuring Access to Federally Assisted Programs
As you know, Federal laws prohibit recipients of financial assistance from discriminating on the basis of race,
color, national origin, religion, sex, or disability in funded programs or activities, not only in respect to
employment practices but also in the delivery of services or benefits. Federal law also prohibits funded programs
or activities from discriminating on the basis of age in the delivery of services or benefits.
Providing Services to Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Individuals
;In accordance with Department of Justice Guidance pertaining to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C. S 2000d, recipients of Federal financial assistance must take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access
to their programs and activities for persons with limited English proficiency (LEP). For more information on the
civil rights responsibilities that recipients have in providing language services to LEP individuals, please see the
website at http://www.lep.gov.
Ensuring Equal Treatment for Faith-Based Organizations
The Department of Justice has published a regulation specifically pertaining to the funding of faith-based
organizations. In general, the regulation, Participation in Justice Department Programs by Religious
Organizations; Providing for Equal Treatment of all Justice Department Program Participants, and known as the
Equal Treatment Regulation 28 C.F.R. part 38, requires State Administering Agencies to treat these organizations
the same as any other applicant or recipient. The regulation prohibits State Administering Agencies from making
award or grant administration decisions on the basis of an organization's religious character or affiliation,
religious name, or the religious composition of its board of directors.
The regulation also prohibits faith-based organizations from using financial assistance from the Department of
Justice to fund inherently religiou:> activities. While faith-based organizations can engage in non-funded
inherently religious activities, they must be held separately from the Department of Justice funded program, and
customer:> or bcneliciaries cannot be compelled to participate in them. The Equal Treatment Rcgulation also
makes clear that organizations participating in programs fundcd by the Dcpartment of Justicc are not pennilted to
discriminate in the provision ofscrvices on the basis ofa beneficiary's religion. For more inf(xmation on the
regulation, plea:>e see OCR's website at http://w\V\V.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/ctflJo.htm.
Stale Adml11istcring Agenclcs and lilith-based organizations should abo note tbat thc Safe Streets Act, as
amended; thc Victims ofCrlmc Act, as amendcd; and thc Juvenilc Jusliec and Dclinqucncy Prcvention Act. as
amcnded, contain prohibitions against tliscrlml11atillll on thc baSIS of religion in cmploymcnt. Thesc employmcnt
provisions have been spcci lically incorporated into 2X C.F.R. Part JR. I (I) and JX.2I.fJ. Conscqucntly, in many
circumstanccs, it wOldd bc impcrlnissible for faith-based organizations seekl11g or rceeiving funding authorized by
these statutcs to havc policies or practiccs that condition htnng and other cmployment-rclatcd dceislons lm the
rcligionof applicant;, or cl11ployce,. Programs subject to thcse nondiscrimination provisions may bc flHl11d on
OCR's WChSltc at http://www.ojp.usdoj.go\!on!. Qucstions ahout thc rcgulation or the statutes that prohibIt
discrimination in cmploymcnt may he dlrceted to this Oflice
Enforcing Civil Rights Laws
All recipicnts of Federal financial as,istanee, rcgardless of the particular funding ,ource, the amount of the grant
award, or the number of cmployees in the workforcc, arc subject to the prohibitions against unlawful
discrimination. Accordingly, OCR invcstigates rccipicnt;, that are thc subject of discrimination complaints from
both individuals and groups. In addition, based on regulatory criteria, OCR selects a numbcr ofrecipients each year
for compliance reVIew" audits that require rccipients to submit data showing that they are providing services
equitably to all segments of their scrvice population and that their employment practices meet equal employmcnt
opportunity standards.
Compl}'ing with the Safe Streets Act or Program Requil'ements
In addition to these general prohibitions, an organization which is a recipient of financial assistance subject to the
nondiscrimination provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (Safe Streets Act) of 1968, 42
U.S.c. 9 3789d(c), or other Federal grant program requirements, must meet two additional requirements:(l)
complying with Federal regulations pertaining to the development of an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan
(EEOP), 28 C.F.R. 942.301-.308, and (2) submitting to OCR Findings of Discrimination (see 28 C.F.R. ~9
42.205(5) or 31.202(5)).
I) Meeting the EEOP Requirement
In accordance with Federal regulations, Assurance NO.6 in the Standard Assurances, COPS Assurance No. 8.B, or
certain Federal grant program requirements, your organization must comply with the following EEOP reporting
requirements:
If your organization has received an award for $500,000 or more and has 50 or more employees (counting both
full- and part-time employees but excluding political appointees), then it has to prepare an EEOP and submit it to
OCR for review within 60 days from the date of this letter. For assistance in developing an EEOP, please
consult OCR's website at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/eeop.htm. You may also request technical assistance from
an EEOP specialist at OCR by dialing (202) 616-3208.
If your organization received an award between $25,000 and $500,000 and has 50 or more employees, your
organization still has to prepare an EEOP, but it does not have to submit the EEOP to OCR for review. Instead,
your organization has to maintain the EEOP on file and make it available for review on request. In addition, your
organization has to complete Section B of the Certification Fonn and return it to OCR. The Certification Form can
be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ocr/eeop.htm.
If your organization received an award for less than $25,000; or if your organization has less than 50 employees,
regardless of the amount of the award; or if your organization is a medical institution, educational institution,
nonprofit organization or Indian tribe, then your organization is exempt from the EEOP requirement. However,
your organization must complete Section A ofthc Certification Form and return it to OCR. The Certification Form
can be found at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov!ocr!eeop.htm.
2) Submitting Findings of Discrimination
In the cvcnt a Fcderal or State court or Federal or Statc administrative agency makes an adverse linding of
discrimination against your organization after a due proccss hearing, onthc ground of race, color, rcligion, national
origin, or sex, your organizationmllst submit a copy of the finding to OCR l'or rcvicw.
Ensurin~ the Compliance of Snhrecipients
(I' your organ]~al1()n111akes ,ubawards 10 otber agencies, you arc re'pons]blc 1'01' ~hsuring that ,ubrecipients also
comply w]th all ortbe applicable Federal ci,i1 rights laws, including the requirements pertainll1g 10 devclopll1g
and submiltll1g an I:LO!', reporting FlI1dings of Discrimination. and providing language ,erv]ces to LEI' persons.
)tatc agencies that l1l~lke subawards must have in place ,tandard grant a,surances and review procedure, to
demonstrate that they arc ell'ecti\'Cly 11l0nitonng the c]vd rights col1lphance or subrec'lJients.
Irwe can assist you in any way 111 rullilhng your civil nghb resPllnsibilities as a recipient orFederall\lI1dll1g.
please call OCR at (20l) 307-0690 or visit our website at http://www.o.lp.usdo.J.gov/ocr/.
Sincerely,
~ ;. /i.W--
Michael L. Alston
Director
cc; Grant Manager
Financial Analyst
Bureau of Justice Assistance
r~--~---- ------------------------,------ -------1
I I
I p-\(il: UI I
i G'"ant I
i I
I I
- - i - - - - -- -- ---------------- ----- - -- --~-- - ~---- - - --I
14,1\\,\1(1) i>[ \IIJI R 2(0) III H\-OIIR I
1-:-pR(~-:~'~ I~::~-~~:~-----::-::--~(;- (:~(;~,; ~------ I
LIl(,E[p[-,RIOD-IROM 10,(11,2006 10 O'iJl(1:iJ[(I
l~~\RD 1),1 ;:;;--~::;-;;::-;~;~~_17' AC110N
x, SL:pPLnll-NT 'He t-1Il I'R Inillal
00
Dcpartment or JU,tICC
Onicc llr JUStlCC Programs
I
1---
II RLClp[I-,~'n :\\\11: ,\:\D ,\lJllRLSS Ilncludlllg ;,p C"de)
I
I
I
I
[A, ('!,A:\ 1'1'1: IRS!VENDOR \0
City llf HI <:nh.'1 lnn
345 6th SIICC!. Suite (Jon
BIL'lIlCrtO!l. \\ A 9X,'-,'-7
9[600123[
'I, PREVIOUS A \IARD AMOUN!'
<; 0
3, PROJECT TITLE
10, AMOUNT OF TillS AWARD
S 03,79R
FY 2007 JAG Program
I r. TOTAL AWARD
S 63.79X
12, SPI'CIAL CONDITIO"S
Till' ABOVI' GRANT PROJECT [S APPROVED SUBJECT TO SUCII CONDITIONS OR LIMITATIONS AS ARE SET FORTII
ON T[IE ATTACIIED PAGE(S),
[3, STATUTORY AUTIIOR[TY FOR GRANT
This project i;; ~llppOltcd under 42 U.S C. 3751 (a) (13JA ~ JAG Fonl1ula)
[5_ METIIOD OF PA YMENT
PA:PRS
AGENCY APPROVAL
[0, TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL
GRANTEE ACCEPTANCE
[R, TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTIIOR[ZED GRANTEE OFFICIAL
Dl)mmgo S. I krr;liz
Cary BOLCOHIO
Mayor
DIrector, Bureau of Justice Assistance
17, SIGNATURE OF APPROVING OFF[CIAL
19, SIGNATURE OF AUTIIORIZED REC[P[ENT OFF[CIAL
19A, DATE
()/~
AGENCY USE ONL Y
20, ACCOUNTING CLASS[F[CAT[ON CODES
I-ISCAL FUND BUD_ DIV_
YL\R CODE ACT OFe. RI:,(; ,liB POMS AMOUNT
21, OJ07U00230
x
B
DJ
XO
011
00
63 )n
L
.-J
OJP [,(JRM 4000'2 (RLV 5-X)) PRI:V[OUS [:[)[TlO\S ARE O!lSOLF rE,
OJP IIJR\141100i2 (RHi 4-,IXI
Grant
-~~-------------- - -_._--~.----I--------~----------- ~---~
!
I
I
I I'A(,L DL
I
I
I
____1~__~___~_~
Departmcnt of Justice
Ufflce of Justicc Programs
Bureau of ,Justice
Assistance
AWARD CONTIl\UATlOl'I
SHEET
I
I
------~------~--~-- -----------_.__._---------~------ ._-----~-----.
I'IW.IIX"j :--'U\II\LR cIl07-IlJ-llX-1I15X
,\WARD IlA 1"1'
OX! 16/2007
SPECIAL CONDf7JO/v'S
I.
The rccipient agrccs to comply with the financial and administrative requirements set f()rth in the current edition ofthc
Office of Justice Programs (0.11') FlI1aneial Guide.
~
The recipient acknowledges that failure to submit an acceptable Equal Employment Opportunity Plan (if recipient is
required to submit one pursuant to 28 C.F.R. Section 42.302), that is approved by the Office for Civil Rights, is a
violation of its Certified Assurances and may result in suspension or termination of funding, until such time as the
recipient is in compliance.
3.
The recipient agrees to comply with the organizational audit requirements of OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States,
Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, as further described in the current edition of the 0.11' Financial
Guide, Chapter 19.
4.
Recipient understands and agrees that it cannot use any federal funds, either directly or indirectly, in support of the
enactment, repeal, modification or adoption of any law, regulation or policy, at any level of government, without the
express prior written approval of 0.11'.
5.
The grantee agrees to assist BJA in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other related
federal environmental impact analyses requirements in the use of these grant funds, either directly by the grantee or by
a subgrantee. Accordingly, prior to obligating grant funds, the grantee agrees to first detern1ine ifany of the following
activities will be related to the use of the grant funds.
The grantee understands that this special condition applies to its following new activities whether or not they are being
specifically funded with these grant funds. That is, as long as the activity is being conducted by the grantee, a
subgrantee, or any third party and the activity needs to be undertaken in order to use these grant funds, this special
condition must first be met. The activities covered by this special condition are:
a. New construction;
b. Minor renovation or remodeling of a property either (a) listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places or (b) located within a I DO-year flood plain;
c. A renovation, [ease, or any proposed use of a building or facility that will either (a) result in a change in its basic
prior use or (b) significantly change its size; and,
d. Implementation ofa new program involving the use of chemicals other than chemicals that are (a) purchased as an
incidental component of a funded activity and (b) traditionally used, for example, in office, household, recreational, or
education environments.
Application of This Special Condition to Grantee's Existing Programs or Activities: For any of the grantee's or its
subgrantees' existing programs or activities that will be funded by these grant funds, the grantee, upon specific request
from BJA, agrees to cooperate with BJA in any preparation by BJA of a national or program environmental assessment
of that funded program or activity.
L~_~~_--'-~~_______~_~_
0.11' l'UR\t -1000,'2 (/{FV. -I-XX)
1--- ~----~--~----- -~------- ~- - - - ------ - --- - - - - - ~ -------- .------- ---- ------~-------.T---~---------~ ----~-
I
Department ofJmlicc I
Oi'ticc ofJu,tlcc I'rogr~un, A'VARD COl'iTINUATIO;\l I
Bureau of Justice SHEET I'
Assistance I ('
',rant
I '" I
I 'I' I
! I
I--;;;~~~:;-:"~~;'l;'-;---;;'~~;~~(;;-;----'--'~~';~~~~-~-~:;:~;;;----~-------~----.-- ----~-
1- ------------- -~~--- .~---~I'EC~.~~ co~~~)m(~~~;_~-----~-
I 6. Thl' specIal condition facllIt,ltes complIance \Hth the provl'lons of the N,ltlonal El1\lronmcntal PolIcy Act (NI:PA)
I relating to clandestine methamphetamine laboratory operations, including the identification, seizure, or closure of
clandestine methamphetamine laboratories [hereinafter, "meth lab operations"]. No monies from this award may be
obligated to support meth lab operations unless the grantee implements this special condition.
PACil
J Of.
---I
I
I
I
i
I
I
!
I
The Office of Justice Programs (OJP), in consultation with the Bureau of Justice Assi5tanee, the Drug Enforcemcnt
Administration, and the Office for Community Oriented Policing Services, prepared a Program-level Environmental
Assessment (Assessment) goveming meth lab operations. The Assessment describes the adverse environmental,
health, and safety impacts likely to be encountered by law enforcement agencies as they implement specific actions
under their methamphetamine laboratory operations. Consistent with the Assessment, the following terms and
conditions shall apply to the grantee for any OJP funded methlab operations:
A The grantee shall ensure compliance by OJP funded sub-grantees with federal, state, and local environmental,
health, and safety laws and regulations applicable to meth lab operations, to include the disposal of the chemicals,
equipment, and wastes resulting from those operations.
B. The grantee shall have a Mitigation Plan in place that identifies and documents the processes and points of
accountability within its state. This plan will be used to ensure that the adverse environmental, health, and safety
impacts delineated in the Assessment are mitigated in a manner consistent with the requirements of this condition.
C. The grantee shall monitor OJP funded meth lab operations to ensure that they comply with the following nine
mitigation measures identified in the Assessment and whose implementation is addressed in the grantee's Mitigation
Plan. These mitigation measures must be included as special conditions in all subgrants: (See Part II of this special
condition)
7.
I. Provide medical screening of personnel assigned or to be assigned by the grantee to the seizure or closure of
clandestine methamphetamine laboratories;
2. Provide Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) required initial and refresher training for law
enforcement officials and all other personnel assigned to either the seizure or closure of clandestine methamphetamine
laboratories;
3. As determined by their specified duties, equip the personnel with OSHA required protective wear and other required
safety equipment;
4. Assign properly trained personnel to prepare a comprehensive contamination report on each seized/closed
laboratory;
5. Utilize qualified disposal personnel to remove all chemicals and associated glassware, equipment, and contaminated
materials and wastes from the site(s) of each seized laboratory;
6. Dispose of the chemicals, equipment, and contaminated materials and wastes at properly licensed disposal facilities
or, when allowable, at properly licensed recycling facilities;
7. Monitor the transport, disposal, and recycling components of subparagraphs numbered 5. and 6. immediately above
in order to ensure proper compliance;
8. Have in place and implement a written agreement with the responsible state environmental agency. This agreement
mU5t provide that the responsible state environmental agency agrees to (i) timely evaluate the environmental condition
at and around the site of a closed clandestine laboratory and (ii) coordinate with the rcsponsible party, property owner,
or others to ensure that any residual contamination is remediated, if detennined necessary by the state environmental
agency and in accordance with existing state and federal requirements: and
9. Have in place and impJem~nt a written agrcement with the responsible state or local service agencies to properly
respond to any minor, as (Jellned by state law, at the site. This agreement must ensure immcdiate response by qualified
personnel who can (i) respond to the potential h~alth nceds of any minor at the site; (II) tak~ that minor into protective
custocly unle" the minor is criminally involved in the m~th lab actiVities or is subJcct to arrest for othcr criminal
Violations: (ili) cnsure immediate medical testing for methamphetamine toxicity: and (IV) arrange tor any f(.lllow-up
mcdicaltests, exam11lations, or health care made l1ec~ssary as a result of methamph~taminc toxicity.
~
OJ!' F()J{\1400(l/2 {RI'Y, 4-gS)
~ __u --- -~-~~------ ------ ---~~ ~~-~- ~ ---~- - ---~----- ~-- ------r-- -~-------~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
______ _____ ____ ____ ________ ________ _J__ _ __~~_ _~__ ___ ____________ j _____ _______ ______
_:~~~=~~~~_ 2()1I0-~lX-III~_______________\ \V:~I~)~~I~J~~<"21~~~~_________m___________1
SFEClAL CONDITIONS
Department of Justice
Office elf Justice Programs
Bureau of ,Justice
Assistance
AWARD CONTll'iUATION
SHEET
1',\(11.
4 iJF
Grant
8_ The recipient agrees to submit to BJi\ lor review and approval any curricula, training materials, or any other written
materials that will be published, including web-based materials and web site content, through funds Ii-om this grant al
least thirty (30) working days prior to the targeted dissemination date_
9. To avoid duplicating existing nctworks or IT systems in any initiatives funded by BJA tor law enforcement information
sharing systems which involve interstate connectivity betwecnjurisdiction, such systems shall employ, to the extent
possible, existing networks as the communication backbone to achieve interstate connectivity, unless the grantee can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of BJA that this requirement would not be cost effective or would impair the
functionality of an existing or proposed IT system.
10. To support public safety and justice information sharing, OJP requires the grantee to use the National Infonnation
Exchange Model (NIEM) specifications and guidelines for this particular grant. Grantee shall publish and make
available without restriction all schemas generated as a result of this grant to the component registry as specified in the
guidelines. For more infonnation on compliance with this special condition, visit
htlp:! /www.niem.govlimplementationguide.php.
II. The recipient is required to establish a trust fund account. (The trust fund mayor may not be an interest-bearing
account.) The fund may not be used to pay debts incurred by other activities beyond the scope of the Edward Byrne
Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (JAG). The recipient also agrees to obligate and expend the grant funds in
the trust fund (including any interest earned) during the period ofthe grant. Grant funds (including any interest earned)
not expended by the end of the grant period must be returned to the Bureau of Justice Assistance no later than 90 days
after the end of the grant period, along with the final submission of the Financial Status Report (SF-269).
12. The grantee agrees to comply with all reporting, data collection and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by the BJA
in the program guidance for the Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). Compliance with these requirements will be
monitored by BJA.
13. The recipient agrees that any information technology system funded or supported by OJP funds will comply with 28
C.F.R. Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems Operating Policies, if OJP detennines this regulation to be applicable.
Should OJP determine 28 C.F.R. Part 23 to be applicable, OJP may, at its discretion, perform audits of the system, as
per 28 C.F.R. 23.20(g). Should any violation of28 C.F.R. Part 23 occur, the recipient may be fined as per 42 U.S.c.
3789g(c)-(d). Recipient may not satisfY such a fine with federal funds.
14. The recipient agrees that all income generated as a direct result of this award shall be deemed program income. All
program income must be accounted for and used for the purposes under the conditions applicable for the use of funds
under this award, including the effective edition of the OJP Financial Guide and, as applicable, either (I) 28 C.F.R. part
66 or (2) 28 C.F.R part 70 and OMB Circular A-IIO. Further, the use of program income must be shown on the
quarterly Financial Status Report, SF269.
15. The recipient agrees to ensure that the State Information Technology Point of Contact receivcs written notification
regarding any information technology project funded by this grant during the obligation and expenditure period. Thi, is
to facilitate communication among local and state governmental entities regarding various information technology
projects being conducted with thcse grant funds. In addition, the rccipient agrecs to maintain an administrative file
documenting the l11~eting of this requirement. For a list of State Information Technology Points of Contact, go to
http://www.ojp.llsdoj.gov/ec/states.htm .
I
I
l_
16. Grantee agrees to comply with the requirements of28 C.F.R. Part 46 and all Office of Justice Programs poliCIes and
procedures regarding thc protection of human research subjects, including obtainment of InstItutional Rcview Board
approval, if appropriate, and subject infonned consent.
OJ!' FOR.\140IJlJ/2 (RI:\' 4-XXI
i------- --- --------- --------- ---- -----T-- ------ -------- --------- -----i----------- ---- -----1
I . . Dep,lftmcnt oj J usllce I 'I I
I ()jfice ofJlbtlce Progr,lms I A \VARD CONTINUATION I
, Bureau of Justice I SHEET i 1'\(;/ U}, I
] A";,,"",, I Gmt I
1~~~~~J~'-~;~~~~~~=0~1;~I;-ill}~ -_-=-==~=-~-_~~\~~~~;~---_~~I~~;~~~===~==_~~===~==,
I '
SnTI/lL CONf)fT/ONS
17. Grantce agrees to comply with all confidentiality requirement;. 01'42 use. section 3789g and 2H C.f.R, Part 22 that
arc applicable to collection, use, and revelation of data or information. Grantee further agrees, as a condition of grant
approval, to submit a Privacy Ccrtificate that is in accord with requirements or 28 C.f,R. Part 22 and, in particular,
section 22.23.
18. "Applicants must certify that Limited English Proficiency persons have meaningful access to the services under this
program(s). National origin discrimination includes discrimination on the basis of limited English proficiency (LEP).
To ensure compliance with Title VI and the Safe Streets Act, recipients are required to take reasonable steps to ensure
that LEI' persons have meaningful access to their programs, Meaningful access may entail providing language
assistance services, including oral and written translation when necessary. The U.S. Department of Justice has issued
guidance for grantees to help them comply with Title VI requirements. The guidance document can be accessed on the
Intemet at www.lep.gov,"
19, Recipient agrees that funds provided under this award may not be used to operate a "pay-to-stay" program in any local
jail. Recipient further agrees not to subaward funds to local jails which operate "pay-to-stay" programs.
UJI' HlI\'I1 400012 tRI,\ ,4-XX)
Department of Justice
Officc of Justicc Programs
Bureau o(Ju.I'lice A.I'.I'i.l'lolICe
lI'u<,llI/lg/o/l, }) '-' .lfJ53/
Memorandum To: Onicial Grant File
From:
Maria Pressley, Environmental Coordinator
Subject:
Incorporates NEPA Compliance in Further Developmental Stages for City of
Bremerton
All grants funded under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (JAG) will carry
the following NEPA special condition:
1) The grantee agrees to assist BJA in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
and other related federal environmental impact analyses requirements in the use of these grant funds,
either directly by the grantee or by a subgrantee. Accordingly, prior to obligating grant funds, the grantee
agrees to first determine if any of the following activities will be related to the use of the grant funds. The
grantee understands that this special condition applies to its following new activities whether or not they
are being specifically funded with these grant funds. That is, as long as the activity is being conducted by
the grantee, a subgrantee, or any third party and the activity needs to be undertaken in order to use these
grant funds, this special condition must first be met. The activities covered by this special condition are:
a. New construction;
b. Minor renovation or remodeling of a property either (a) listed on or eligible for listing on the National
Register of Historic Places or (b) located within a 1 DO-year flood plain;
c. A renovation, lease, or any proposed use of a building or facility that will either (a) result in a change
in its basic prior use or (b) significantly change its size; and,
d. Implementation of a new program involving the use of chemicals other than chemicals that are (a)
purchased as an incidental component of a funded activity and (b) traditionally used, for example, in
office, household, recreational, or education environments.
Application of This Special Condition to Grantee's Existing Programs or Activities: For any of the
grantee's or its subgrantees' existing programs or activities that will be funded by these grant funds, the
grantee, upon specific request from BJA, agrees to cooperate with BJA in any preparation by BJA of a
national or program environmental assessment of that funded program or activity. .
II, ---- _______m ---~)~)~;~~;~~t- of Just;~;----__----nlll- --G--;~\ N~-~;'~IN)'I~O;;J~E~C-~T-I\S~lErJI\l\11'~1 ~~I.~-yN D U -~~~;~-~;~-II
Office of JU:-.tlCC pll)gram\ ,-' ll' ."\. "
Bureau of Justice ;\ ssistance
i . _ ..__.. _ _ .1~;c",;::,,~_~'""t.I.~~'~~ '" ..~...I
I Thl' PWjcct" 'llpl"J11c'd ulldcr42l! S C. 3751(a) (IlJA - LV, hmnlll'i)
I
1. STAFF CONTACT (;\,Imc & telephonc nllmher)
, pROJEC r llIRI,CTOR (:--Iamc. addres> & telephonc nllmher)
kffh:y S. Fcltcn-Circ-cn
(202) 514-XX74
Cnllg Rogers
ChicI' of Police
1 ()25 Burwel1 Street
Bremerton, W A 9X337-1 X 12
(360) 473-5750
3a. TITLE OF THE PROGRAM
3b. POMS CODE (SEE INSTRUCTIONS
ON REVERSE)
2007 Justice ASSistance Grant Program
4. TITLE OF PROJECT
FY 2007 JAG Program
5. NAME & ADDRESS OF GRANTEE
6. NAME & ADRESS OF SUBGRANTEE
City of Brc-mclion
345 6th Street, Suite 600
Bremerton, W A 98337
7. PROGRAM PERIOD
8. BUDGET PERIOD
FROM:
10/0 1/2006
TO: 09/30/20 I 0
FROM:
10/01/2006
TO: 09/30/2010
9. AMOUNT OF A WARD
S 63,798
10. DATE OF AWARD
OX/I 6/2007
11. SECOND YEAR'S BUDGET
12. SECOND YEAR'S BUDGET AMOUNT
13. THIRD YEAR'S BUDGET PERIOD
14. THIRD YEAR'S BUDGET AMOUNT
15. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (Sec instructIOn on reveroe)
The Edward Byrne Memonal Justice ASsIstance Grant Program (JAG) allow:-, states, tnbe...., and local go\'crnmcnt~ to ~\Ipport a broad range of
activities to prevent and control cnmc ha~cJ on thclr nWlllocal need" and COl1lhllons. Grallt I'und:-. can he u:-.cd for ~talc and localll1ltJatlvc~,
tcchOlcal assistance, rrJ1J1l1lg, personnL'i, eqlllpmcnt, :-.uppl1cs, cOlltractual ~llpport. <:lI1d lnfonnatH1n sy:--tem:-. for cnmlnal Justice for anyone or
more of tilc follOWIng purpo....e areas: ]) law cnfon:c1l1cnt progrd1l1S; 2) prO~cclltlon Jlld COllrt program,,; J) prc\ cntlOl1 and CdlJCatloll program.'.; 4)
com..:ctlnns and cOlllmunlty corr('ctlons program", 5) drug tn:atllli.'n1 programs; and 0) rlannlllg, ~.:valtl<lllon, and kchnology llllprO\i.'l11cnt
prugr<ll11~.
I
I 1 he (ily ollllcmer1nn "Iii o,c theu rhc,d Ye,ll Z007 J,\G lund, to purclusc cqulpmcnt ,Ind "'I'plie, 10 support Ihe police dep,utmenl's
L""" """",,m "_"mo, ..,,,,,.. """U"-""",,,,,- ,,"'..,," ""'",,,,,,.
OJP FORM 40()O/2 (RFV. 4-XK)
--
_._------~-_.----- ------------- ---~--~-~--- --~-----~------------_._~-----_."-- -~---- -~-------_._-~------- -----------
rhl..' clav..;roOl11 Ir.l1lllllg "y.,tcm !"';I '-.t<lIL'-of-lhc-an IOU] that ll~(,~ computer gellclall..'d. 11l!lh ddilllllon \ ltkc) cm lronmcnt, fur office'!"" to \lse ~ll1d It
.Il,,() :dlow<., the pollcc department lu Ilam,ll a lc\cll1fI1l1el1"ll)' lllat call1wl hc lephcltcd thnlll);h tr:ldltlondllll<.,IIlKtlolwl !lH:!hod~. rhL' "U<"L' of
f-ole<:" tralllJllg <.,\1l11d.llor prO\llk~ ufliecl" \\'llh.\ hlt;lli...'r k\cl ot'n)l11pl.'lL'llCY and proflclcnq l"1.>ulllng 1Il allllll'II.';l:-,C lIl11ffll'Crtllld puhl,c ~;lI(-ty
'\C\,''\l'F
L__
I
I
I
I
I
~
DATE SUBMITTED: September 5, 2007
BILL # 0 7 - d- :;Ld--
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
~f
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Professional Service Agreement
with RH2 Engineers for 2008 Water Main
Improvements
Committee Meeting Date: September 12, 2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 19, 2007
Department: PW &U-Engineering
Presenter: Michael Mecham
Phone: 473-5288
SUMMARY: The Utilities Division has identified several water mains that need to be replaced due to
deterioration or are undersized. The proposed professional services contract is for design services for
these water mains. RH2 Engineers was chosen from the Engineering Division list of qualified
engineering firms for this type of work. Scope of Work, cost and schedule are included in the exhibits
attached to the Professional Services Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Council Summary; 2) Professional Services Agreement; 3) Exhibits A, A-I,
B, C and D.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The cost of this contract is $302,389. $500,000 is
budgeted in the Water Utility Capital budget for this professional services contract. Construction for
these projects will be budgeted in following years.
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR.
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
--jj~ 1#r/~~ .
.4~ffilX-- /
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve Professional Service Agreement with RH2
Engineers for 2008 Water Main Improvements and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the
agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
COUNCIL SUMMARY
2008 WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
Summary. Each year the Utilities Division replaces several water mains
throughout the City. Typically these water mains are small enough in scope( less
than $50,000) that City crews can do the work. There are several water mains
proposed for replacement. These water mains were chosen using the priority
criteria of degree of degradation and the necessity to replace the main prior to
the street being overlay with asphalt. RH2 Engineers was chosen from the
Engineering Division list of qualified engineering firms for this type of work. A
scope of work, cost and schedule is included in the exhibits attached to the
professional services agreement.
Financial Summary. $500,000 was in the water utility capital budget for this
activity. The contract with RH2 Engineers is for $302,389.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
[2008 Water Main Improvements]
The City of Bremerton ("City") and RH2 Engineers ("Consultant"), referred to
collectively as the "Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services:
I. Scope: The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the
Scope of Work, dated , 20_, including any attachments thereto, attached hereto
as Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be modified
only pursuant to Section VII.G. of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides for
unspecified additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express written
request of the City. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this
Agreement will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in
effect at the time such services are performed.
II. Term: The City and the Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in
Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work
described in Exhibit A is to be completed as provided for in the work schedule attached hereto as
Exhibit B; provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable
delays or extra work as provided for in section IX (A) of this agreement.
III. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the
City shall pay Consultant in an amount not to exceed $320,389. Consultant's charges and bills
shall conform to the fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this
reference.
The Consultant shall submit regular billing statements detailing work performed and
amount charged on each task or portion thereof. The descriptions shall conform to and fall
within the categories set out in the Scope of Work and/or Fee Schedule. Upon receipt of a
conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment. PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to prioritize scoped work and accelerate and/or delay
work tasks under the time frame set forth in Section II herein. The Consultant's labor rates and
billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibit C.
Consultant shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated
for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this
Agreement. Consultant shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant
to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in accordance with
Exhibit C.
If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold
payment until the statement is brought into compliance. Such withholding does not relieve
Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement.
BrcmertonJRH2 Engineers
2008 Water Main Improvements
PageIof6
IV. Relationship of Parties: Consultant represents that it is skilled in the matters addressed
in the Scope of Work and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its
field of expertise. Consultant and its personnel are independent Consultants and not employees
of the City. Consultant and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the
City's employees and other Consultants. None of the benefits provided by the City to its
employees, including, but not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance
are available from the City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-Consultants of the
Consultant. Consultant will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of
Consultant's agents, employees, representatives and sub-Consultants during the performance of
this Agreement. The City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent
Consultants to perform the same or similar work.
As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management. The
City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of
managerial control over Consultant or its personnel.
As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for payment of all taxes and
licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees
include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State
professional licensing, and City business licensing. If any taxes or fees due the City have been
declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges
arising from the delinquency, from any payments due Consultant.
V. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages,
losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the
performance of this Agreement, except for that portion ofthe injuries and damages caused by the
City's sole negligence.
The City's review or acceptance of any of the work when completed shall not be grounds
to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to
RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons
or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant
and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability
hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence.
IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE
INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S
WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER
ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED THIS WAIVER.
The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or telmination of this Agreement.
Bremelion/RH2 Engineers
2008 Water Main Improvements
Page 2 of6
VI. Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in
connection with the perfonnance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-Consultants.
Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall
provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing:
Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per occurrence/claim.
Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the
Consultant.
The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason,
proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as
evidence of coverage.
VII. General Conditions:
A. Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Consultant shall furnish
periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and
documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Consultant shall maintain
accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to
substantiate all billed amounts.
B. Ownership and Use of Records and Documents: Original documents, drawings,
designs and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement are the
property of the City. All written information submitted by the City to the Consultant in
connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be
safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant safeguards like
information relating to its own business. If such information is publicly available or is already in
Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant from third
parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or otherwise.
All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored
at Consultant's office in Port Orchard, Washington. Consultant shall make such data, documents,
and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing,
modifying and updating as necessary until such time as the City is capable of storing such
information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the
City upon its request, and at reasonable cost.
All documents, including all reports, drawings, specifications, computer software or other
items prepared or furnished by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, are instruments of service
with respect to the project and are the property of the City. Any reuse by the City for other than
the specific purpose intended will be at City's sole risk.
Bremelion/RH2 Engineers
2008 Water Main Improvements
Page 3 of 6
C. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk: Consultant shall take all precautions necessary
and shall be responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub-consultants in the
perfomlal1ce of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose.
All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss
of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the
work.
D. Place of Work: The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this
Agreement at its offices in Port Orchard, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described
in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at locations mutually
agreed upon by the parties.
E. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement
between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or
oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement.
F. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be found void, the balance of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
G. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by
both Parties.
H. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the
parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1 st class mail, or by personal service, and
shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement
or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing.
City Address
Michael Mecham
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, Washington 98310
Consultant Address
Mike Pleasants
RH2 Engineers
600 Kitsap St, Suite 101
Port Orchard, Washington 98366
1. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a
waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be
deemed waiver of any other right or power.
J. Non-Waiver of Breach: The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any
of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in
one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants,
agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect.
K. Compliance with Laws: Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State,
and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement.
Brcmerton/RH2 Engineers
2008 Water Main Improvements
Pagc40f6
L. Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws
of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement
shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court.
M. Attomeys' Fees: In the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions
herein, each party shall pay all its own costs and attomey's fees.
N. Assignment: Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without the written
consent of the City shall be void.
VIII. Nondiscrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate in employment or services to the
public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, disability, or
sexual orientation except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification.
IX. Termination: This Agreement shall remain in force until completion and acceptance of
the services, terminated by written instrument upon mutual consent, or by the City of Bremerton
for convenience. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a Party if the
other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party, and the non-
performing Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within thirty (30)
days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Any Notice by
Consultant shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work
current through the termination date.
If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in
Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is
cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the
completion ofthe work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement.
A. Excusable Delays: The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall
Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due
to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials,
equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other nationql emergency; 2)
any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes
not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are
beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not
restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity. PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in
writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement,
the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the
work for a period of time commensurate with the period of excusable delay.
B. Rights Upon Termination: In the event oftermination, the City shall pay for all
services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of tennination, as described on a final
invoice submitted to the City. After tellnination, the City may take possession of all records and
data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City
Bremerton/RH2 Engineers
2008 Water Main Improvements
Page 5 0[6
without restriction. Any such llse not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to
perfonn shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant.
CITY OF BREMERTON
CONSULTANT
By:
its:
Date:
By:
its:
Date:
Approved as to form:
Attest:
Bremerton City Attorney
City Clerk
Bremerton/RH2 Engineers
2008 Water Main Improvements
Page 6 of6
EXHIBIT A
City of Bremerton
2008 Water Main Improvements
SCOPE OF WORK
BACKGROUND
TIle proposed project includes improvements to the City of Bremerton's (City's) water
system. The improvements include 27 separate projects, totaling over 23,000 feet of water
mains. Most of the improvements are pipeline replacements. Some new mains are also
included. The understanding of the project list is attached as Exhibit A-1.
The Public Works and Utility Department at the City will construct all projects estimated
to cost under $50,000. For these projects, RH2 will provide stamped and signed
construction drawings, but no specifications. The remaining projects will be combined to
create one bid package. This contract does not include services during bidding or
construction as the schedule of the construction of these improvements is not known at
this time. The target completion date of all tasks included in this contract is the end of the
2007 calendar year.
TASK 1- PERMITTING/EASEMENTS
Objective
Submit applications for or negotiate the necessary approvals/permits or easements,
respectively, that are required for the construction of the water mains.
Approach
A) Permit Information Collection - Compile basic information on known streams,
wetlands, regulated shorelines and ESA-listed species in the project area, to be
used in preparing the SEP A and other permitting documents. Conduct limited
field documentation of critical areas along the alignment, topographic map review,
County GIS review, Federal Species lists requests and related information review.
B) Prepare SEPA Checklist - Prepare a Draft SEPA checklist for final review,
signature and processing by the City.
C) Shoreline Permit and Critical Area Review Application - Prepare Draft JARP A
application for final review, signature and processing by the City.
Note: The Jvork jor Task 1, Jvhile an eJtimate ,s provided, JJlill be petformed on a time and e.':jJeme basiJ due
to the uncertain!] of the eJfott required.
Product
I nformation and photo documen tation to be used for SEP A and J ARPA preparation;
one paper copy and one electronic file of a Draft SEPA checklist; and one paper copy
and one electronic file of a Draft JARP A application.
9/../2\J11"i
Pag" l
/ ' ",-"",Ii, 1"1111'- i " P" il" ,.Ii ',l.ll \ .,r- l~, l me 11"' ,n \~~ IWI \\ lIr 1 \1.ull 11)'1';1' ,\', 1l1'.,!1' \ 1;1(\ I :II(I.~ \\ .dl"1 \l,I'l1 Ill1jll (,' ~m"l1r, ::,< 1\\ <I( ".
City of Bremerton
2008 lV.'1ter Jl-falil Improvements
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 2 - BASE MAp PREPARATION AND SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
Objective
Collect the information needed to determine the water mam alignment and
constructability of the proposed water mains.
Approach
A) Utility Records - Prepare maps to show the extents of the improvements. Provide
these maps to City and franchises with a request for record drawings. Collect utility
drawing records from the City and franchise utility providers. Collected utility
records will be used to verify accuracy of site survey.
B) Site Survey - Retain two licensed surveyors who will perform surveys of the
surface features, the located underground utilities and topographical features with
two-foot contours. The surveyors will coordinate the locating of underground
utilities by an underground utility locator. Prepare maps and meet with the
surveyors in the field to confirm the extents of the survey information needed.
C) Base Map Drawings - Create base sheets and format survey drawing data. Perform
site visits to review completeness of survey and utility data. Establish stationing for
water main design with reference to permanent monuments.
D) Subsurface Investigation - It is assumed the City has and will provide soil data
from projects constructed throughout the City in the vicinity of the proposed
projects. Conduct a limited geological and hydrogeological exploration using test
pits to characterize stratigraphy and ground water conditions. The City will provide
the operator, Baggers, equipment and any other staff required to dig and backfill
the tests pits. Depth of test pits will be as deep as possible with the equipment
available. With a rubber tired backhoe we should be able to excavate to 10 feet
below ground surface dependant on groundwater conditions and adjacent
structures/ roads. RH2 will prepare test pit logs and interpret information. RH2
will develop geotechnical and engineering geology recommendations for trenching,
handling of subsurface water, placement of improvements, temporary cut and fill
slopes, backfill and compaction recommendations and include recommendations
for import vs. use of native earth as backf1ll. If a directional drill or boring is
required to complete portions of these projects, such recommendations can only
be provided if previous reports of adjacent borings are available for review
including investigation and construction records. If no reports exist such
information can be provided via an amendment to this scope of work. \V'e assume
the water mains constructed down any steep slopes can be accomplished with
standard cut and fill trench. If directional drilling or other methods are required
they shall be reviewed via amendment to the contract.
Product
AutoCAD base map drawings at a scale of 1" = 30' using the site topography survey
with 2-foot contours detailing located underground and surface utilities.
I); 1: ~(IIII
Page 2
I \,~"".\ 1111'1111;'- '.1'1 "p'h 11",( ,11\ ,-,I l'II"I1'(:II'In\.2I)I),') \\',\Jr" \1,1111 Irll!'IL)\'!'l1ll r,ls'J)JC\1 :illIS \\ ,llll \lWl Il1lj1[, ,\ nT" IH, :-,U\\ r!'J<
City of Bremerton
2008 Water Main Improvements
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
~An engineering geology and geotechnical engineering report that will include test pit
logs and construction recommendations that can be incorporated into the construction
documents.
TASK 3 - PREPARE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Objective
Prepare construction plans and specifications for the installation of the water mains.
Approach
A) Preliminary Alignment - Meet with City to develop design criteria. Prepare
schematic layout of preliminary alignment. Meet with City to discuss before
continuing design efforts. Preliminary plans will be plan view sheets at a scale of 1"
= 30.'
B) Plan and Prof1le - Prepare plans of the water main alignment for review and
approval by the City. Plans will include TESC features and pavement restoration
extents. Scale will be 1" = 30' horizontal and 1" = 5' vertical.
C) Connection Details - Prepare details of temporary testing connections and
permanent final connections to the existing water system. Develop a plan for the
abandonment of the existing water main for each of the improvements.
D) Water Main Improvement Details and Notes - Prepare special details not included
in the City Standards as needed to convey scope and construction standards for
water main improvements. Provide General Notes in conformance with City
Standards for construction drawings.
E) Pavement Restoration Details and Notes - Prepare special details not included in
the City Standards as needed to convey scope and construction standards for
pavement restoration improvements. Provide General Notes in conformance with
the City Standards for construction dra'\vings.
F) In House Review - Conduct a Quality Control review of the plans and
specifications at 50 percent completion of construction documents.
G) City Review - Submit plans to City at 50 percent completion. Attend 50 percent
design review meeting for clarification on City comments.
H) Cost Estimate - Prepare preliminary cost estimate at 50 percent completion of
constluction documents.
I) Construction Contract and Specifications - City to provide RH2 Engineering with
a master copy of the 'boiler plate' Contract Document section in a Microsoft \',lord
electronic file. Prepare advertisement to bidders for the City to advertise. Prepare
bid schedule, and measurement and payment descriptions. Prepare the Technical
Specifications through reference to and modification of the curren t
\,(!SDOTj f\P\Vz\ Standard Specifications so as to be compatible with construction
scope and City Standards.
Page 3
') i),' ~\)III
J, ',~', \' 1'\':~'I'L ,. J'I"I"h.d',I.itl ,)1 ]1,1('111('1(' 11' 1(11),'-( \X ,lIl I .\1.\111 11'1'1<'\'
111<\! 1ll\lS \\ \10111' lin)'I" ([111'1'1" '--( l\\
City of Bremerton
2008 ll/:,uer M.I1D Improvements
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
Product
One set of preliminary alignment
specification and bid documents.
plans. One set of 50 percent construction plans,
TASK 4 - FINALIZE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND Bm DOCUMENTS
Objective
Finalize plans, specifications and contract documents.
Approach
A) In House Review - Conduct a Quality Control reVIew of the Plans and
Specifications prior to submitting 90 percent plans and specifications for City
review and prior to preparation of final bid documents. Perform edits to plans and
specifications based upon in-house review prior to 90 percent design review
meeting with the City.
B) City Review - Submit plans and specifications to City at 90 percent completion.
Attend 90 percent design review meeting for clarification on City comments.
C) Finalize Documents - Perform final edits to plans and specifications based upon
in-house review and City comments.
D) Cost estimate - Prepare cost estimate at 90 percent completion of construction
documents. Finalize with completion of construction documents.
Product
Two sets of construction documents, including plans, specifications and contract
documents.
!)/;:'~(lllf
Page 4
/ \ "t '\ l~\I~m('~, \]1" 'p,,~.ll \ ( ,1: ,Ii I~I( i nn t. JrJ' ~\!n," \\ ,<I, , :\1,'11 II npl ,,\ '-'I'lUll ,\ n I{ \ I - ":llflH \\ ,Ile" \1,111 1 nq)1 ,,' '. I'll II[" ,"::'U\\' ,I"l
EXHIBIT A-I
City of Bremerton
2008 Water Main Improvements
Project List
-, -,
Ploject #-. Ploposed Di.l. Existing Dia. Length
From (Along)
At
To
.At
P-30 8 4 239 Easement Marlow Ave Easement iW->N turn
_C'~_A" '~~n" ~_~~^,,~^, ,,~ ''''_C__C'C~ ,,- "'lr'"' . '"~ 'w~~~._^ _, ",,__ . __ _ _ H" .
P-31 12 6 914 Winfield Ave E 16th St Winfield Ave .50' south of E 18th St
P-32 8 1,204 . Orange Dr N\iV NW Taylor Rd Orange Dr.. NW .Seabeck Highway
" , " ~ ~ , , . ~,12ea_d~n.~. ....
P-36 8 4 758 .l?e_a~!!~~_tti9~'!'Iay ... .~orthla.k_e\IVay .NW ~e<Jb!!.l:kJlig~wa)' ..
P-37 8 4 248 Robin Ave Dibb St Robin Ave E 32nd St
P-38 12 8 295 Winfield Ave E 15th St Winfield Ave E 16th St
P-4O 8 6 2,900 Marine Dr Cedar Dr Marine Dr :Fitz Dr
. ,_~~ n_'~" . ',. ,,- , , . - ~.,.
P-41 12 6 2,605 Jacobson BouL Trenton Ave Jacobson BouL iNE Alder St
P-42 8 6 1,203 Kitsap Way Oyster Bay Ave Kitsap Way 'National Ave
P-43 8 6 898 .l<ttsap\lVay .J~url:hfi~ld))r . ........ .. ~ Kits'!p \iVaI' _. _ . _ ,~Q[)' 131==. oU3urEhfieJd [)! .
P-45 12 8 1,419 Northlake Way NW 1419' south of Lebers Lane NW Northlake Way NW 'Lebers Ln NW
P-46 8 6 352 Juniper Morrison Ct Juniper . Dead end
P-47 8 3 789 E 18th St ...I: e ~ry Av.e__.. .___ . . E 18th St 'Winfield Ave
_ ~,_ _" "~_'~M. ~ '" _ ".~, V_""~,,m_~ <_,. _,,_ '_____u'_p_'-
P-100 8 6 445 Halverson Ave E 30th St Halverson Ave . Sheridan Rd
P-101 8 6 309 Sheridan Rd Halverson Ave Sheridan Rd Sanders Ave
P-102 8 6 545 Sanders Ave Sheridan Rd Sanders Ave ;E 30th St
_ . . ~ "' ,n ,_.~ _ ^ pm Ad _ _ , .
P.103 8 6 351 E 30th St Sanders Ave . Sanders Ave Halverson Ave
P-104 8 6 403 Lewis Ave Sheridan Rd r!V intersection) Lewis Ave Sayl~s Rd .
P-105 8 6 341 Sheridan Rd Lewi.s.Ave (E intersection) Sheridan Rd _ Lewis Ave ryv intersection)
.. .".., , ~ . ,- ---
P-106 8 6 484 Bender Circle NE Intersection Stem II.. Loop Bender Circle NE .NE Foster Rd
P-107 12 8 379 State Highway 3 Turnquist Rd State Highway 3 ,NW->Bend
P-10B 12 8 845 Anderson Hill Rd SW Dead end Anderson Hill Rd SW ,SW Cook Rd
-, ..'^.. , .- " . --. ~ -,", .~O'- E of F eigley. Rd W
P-109 12 8 722 W Frontage Rd State Highway 16 W Frontage Rd
P-110 12 8 91 ., W Frontage Rd 30' W of Feigley Rd W W Frontage Rd !Bendin W Frontage Rd
Hilltop 8 4(2 1,800 .._Hllltcp Ln NW Chicc\'llay ....Hilltop.LI!.I\I\'11 .Chic:[) Way ._
Shore 12 8 1,800 Shore Dr E 10th St Shore Dr Trenton Ave
UnlO n 12 8 800 "Union Ave Werner Rd Union Ave .Poindellter Ave
27 23.139
7i24/2007
. - -,
System Map.
2016
2016
1013
1113
1813
2017
1413-15
2116-17
1517
1316
1115
1814
2016
1913
1913
1913
1913
1814
1814
1703
1214
1426-27
1226
1226
1114
2018(2118
1420
Z.\NewBusiness\Proposal\City ofBremerton\2008 Water Main Improvements\2008 Water Main Exhibit A-I.doc
EXHIBIT B
City of Bremerton
2008 Water Main Improvements
Preliminary Project Schedule
Descri tlon
Duration Completion 2007
Weeks Date
14 2/1/2008
10 11/26/2007
12 1/25/2008
14 2/1/2008
10 3/1/2008
Z INewBuslness\Proposal\City of Bremerton\2008 Water Main Improvements\BRM - 2008 Water Main Improvements - Fee Estimate.xls
7/26/2007
,",'", ,', ,,::/,'/,; ',:A ;, ,:'",',:;","', '" ,r:": ',','1 "l,i, ":<e"" ",' c ',':: <':7;:,'
," ',;" "0';< ",; ,', ;;g,{"i~i' ,,;/r' ,+,;,
" ~~ ~~~ 2;" ", oX ", ~i':~,~;;#~" ,,>, ,.'
!"<>:-" ,',?: '
;~t/t~ -~~~;:,~~:;)::'c;~':~f;'~~.1' '~1
,(::;::::',HQUJU;Y,JlA.,
>~":vi:::;,,:;/;'"'' ':;,:,
:~ ;:,";~~~ ' ^"~~;
;
01 I~:':; ;;1~;
<z' ~
! :
;~~i,~
1,;t;i)i'~,""",';:::'!: ~' " ~e~:;IN'>}B;:~~~ti;'E::S01,~t~:!'~;;'i::t"t~i ;::~"i ,;~:" ;,;~,
e< "e: ' , ,"'. IO,Q'SESEk",.c{ 'C ~,< ,fi ~ :: ~:~;
,,",;,;:::::1 ,; , ,Y' :', ,,;;;:);,,:;,';:iV:: ;', h';':"",;
;'ti' In-house copies (each) .~X~~_______~2.:9.?._ CAD Plots .!-~_________-1l2.:.9.2.. },,;f
't,,; In-house copies (each) !l!}~~~___________~9.;QL CAD Plots .f_l!!!.1'~._______~.:.2.0 "
7. In-house copIes (each) .!.l.~__~_.!Z:.___________J9.}_i._ CAD Plots Ha.!!Jlize _______~~2.2.. ,,"
'0, In-house copies (color) (each) 81/2"XII" $0,85 GIS System Per Hour $10,00
,: In-house copies (color) (each) '8-1/2" X I40;--------$i~O-- GIS Plots 'per Plot --$5,00
;';j In-house copies (color)(each) :D:2~)7" --=:::::::==EJo- In-house Computer :~~~i!our _--===-$92.9._
Mileage .~~.M~______--.!2.:i~_
Digital Camera .~~!2.!!L-___.___~.!Q:9.9_
Digital Camera .~~_~eek _---.--!~9.:~~
Digital Camera R.~}::!onth ___--190,09.
'Note: At project completion all digital photos can be supplied to the
client on CD, upon reql !st
~",;~,~." j #!
;" ~[:,:; ,Y,
GA
Principal
Principal
Principal
IX $171.00
.-.---.---....----.-.........--.
VlII $17100
------_...._--------------
_~L._.____________....!!~i,9.9__
Professional
Professional
Professional
VI $152.00
.---------------..-.
V $144,00
_.--._--------------._--
1:L_________.-!!}.?.:.9.9_
Professional
Professional
Professional
.!!!.________.-!l?~:9.Q...
II ___.-!!lt2.2...
1________--BQ~,9.Q...
','C,
',:,;,
FAX (each sheet)
In-house CAD System
_______________._______~J_2.9.__
Per Hour $25,00
.-.-----..--------------
,,; ,<:"":ii.
'" 'i'.
>, ;," ,~
*
"
" '
Technician
Technician
Technician
Technician
.!Y-_..._______..2!.9.8.OO
III $100.00
.-.-----------
fl____.______E?.:.9.9._
.L-__________~~.:.2.9_
Administrative
Administrative
Administrative
Administrative
Administrative
.Y-___.___-1?12.9.
IV ___________-1~2,OO_
,!!!..._______~.?!2.0
,!!____~.?.~,OO
I $~~2.9._
i"i
J '~"; .....;')j,;...'
~~~;:.';' ; "eitA
~';']~i('
,. ;' ., .,
I',,',' ;Y, ,':1, 'c',;, :f': "Y,'" ..', ",,'..'.:. ? ,,'
IS ~',f;:'" :c .'/ ,:p, '.',' ., '::,<
Is :', .' ,'.... .... ", i'".,,; (,';i:
i "':,.':::~ t!:;":v, "\;;~<<:;i2,tJ.,; ,;.)' i;.~
I,:::,.,. .",,"',,;; ::i,. :.'; :' ;';' :'. ':";';;', >\ ,,::/:,L'.,:;'::".
.' !",. :,,;./,/1' " ."';:~ .^' 'if:?'L; '.' ~:\;.
,;',!~~~"~;,:}i,',i,,:i, .' ....... .... ',:', ';^::,'; .,,,<2 \,
:;"'C,>,' ;...EF;:,:;;/<,;~y{.,_=,;c~:;.,::;'\...{,;:,' ,. .' ..... 'i,> .' ,; .
~".:;:,::;,'"
:,!!~i:::iz ..~jC"'l'.c
.;;>';';:;,
?$: ~ ~
~:~iiI7i~b' . .... '. i','
',j\\.,;,;':!<'/(":,.,;;; .:'::"1'...... .... ']i'.::>
RATES <.':'.;:;'Yi;' . ,. ~,'>:.
.....;;::~ '.,.~".t~:< ,,,}!~:!t~~: ' ,:~ 1~,: r,;
'" 11' :i!E~ :6'it .....~
,,':'.;;; . :;:\'!
;":f:, J:':"~:l. '.f'
" . ',.,;.,::;, . ):.::'n ;<' f:t' .i" ;< :,;:;';~f!
. .'. '^" ,'po ,<;,i,. '!"C,:"/> ~"i~~~~1
>::;'\t:::;(:',:, :;";', '~; ,<,"t' ,,: "V",;'.' 'j,
';:::,; i,i\': )
!-I,t!''':''ft'/:';' '",;',,",
..,' ::': ~;2:,'f;2",: ,;' .' '.~; ,X'i
~
,
'/
l'fJ~wf!u"'''~.t\Propo~ar ':"ly 01 B,,,m~rlon';>OO~ W~l"r M.", In pf"~~"'~"I~'ERM. 2noe Wal.., Ma.., Improvement< . r"" Eo1."'''l" .1.
EXHIBIT C
City of Bremerton
2008 Water Main Improvements
Estimate of Time a nd Expense
Description
..~ Classi;icatio~
Principal! Project Project i Staff Engineer ~ Engineering j Engr. i, Staff Scientist i Word Processor
I Manager I Engineer' i ! Technician I Geologist ! !
princi-aiVjiitPro"ies~iVtProiesSlOmtiiii1pMro;;ssfonaiilt-T~niCianTv-'i'-'princiaiviT-rprOfesSi'O'il8ii'ii1Aiimin~trative-ITI-
I~f!
PERMITTING
PefTllit InformatIOn Collection
~-Prepare SEPA Checklist
~ShorelmePermlt and Cnhcal Areas ReView ApplicatIOn
::==~=i==~=~~~-'~~=1==.-:~-::=-t=:~~~:~=:f~~=:~~-:=::t--' .-i. 1- ~i-.-"1--'~=-.=-:
6, 24 I ! 24 I ! I II i 24
Subtotal
Task 2_. BASE MAP PREPARATION & SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
A Utility Records
--E3 ---- Site Survey
C - ----EfaseMap Drawings
D Subsurtace Investtgahon
-... -. .--, --..'-32. ..t..--- -:..-.--+---. 32-.'-- -, -- 32.-- +. . ;--... -+ 8-. ..--
.=-:~:=:~r':~'~;~:==:=f:.~=:f;.- .=f==::~{i=:=:f.===]~.=--=l===-. ;s-'.-:r :~- l -=2~ =::-
4 41 i 32 i 64 10 21 10 4a
Subtotal
Task 3 PREPARE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS .--.-......-.-J_._.._..._.......__.l..._.____....._._...!-.._--.--..-...--...l...-.-._-.._ ___._._.~..__....____.)..-_._.._...;_.._._._..___.__.
---r;--- -.Preiimlnary Alignment 16 i 16 ! 40 i 60 i 1 _ i 6
8 =~-=-~~~and pro~~=-=-~"~____ =~_ ~ :f~~. ~ 1~ : H:~~E:-: :~~= _ ~:_ ~~f~=~I'::'_~ :!~p~'::'-=-:': + : ~~H: ~g ~:_. J-~~=- ~~:~= =:l:.=~~-:::=-:'~=E=-:':'~1!:~~.~~
C Connection Details - I 16 ! 24 ! 40 , 20 : _ ; . ! 8
!~~~~;~~;:~:'" -~. ..--=~~E~~Elf:f~qf~
H- -.. Cost Estimate . ! 4 1 6 1 12 ! - i . i _ ! 4
- -I - --COnstruction Contract -K.SpecificatJons --~.--4--~'r.~.-.--20.~..~.~.-~T.--..--20---_.rM_R_._.2i5'-'~~~T...--.-.-.:-_M'-'~'-T---'.'-':~---T--_-.~-_Hr---"40 -.-.--
Subtotal 12 120! 126 211 110' ; ! 92
66 $ 7.194 $ $
50 $ 5,194 $ $
5a $ 7.206 $ $
174 $ 20,994 $ $
104 $ 12,032 $ $
44 $ 4,956 $ 17,825 $
104 $ 11,172 $ $
132 $ 16,224 $ $
3a4 $ 46,014 $ a7,125 $
140 $ 15.824 $ $-
260 $ 30,096 $ $
101 $ 12,504 $ $
52 $ 5,792 $ $
32 $ 3,632 $ $
56 $ 6.120 $ $
40 $ 4,560 $ $
26 $ 2,954 $ -$
104 $ '10.924 $ $
IU $ 93,106 $ $
g-e,+s---- aN
467 $ 6,361
360 $ 7.566
l,31a $ 22,312
663 rs-
208 $
1,156 $
624 $
2,671 $
'~~
92,9.!l~
13,028
16.646
135,580
1.264 $ 17,088
2.661 $ 32,957
1.007 $ 13.511
461 ~~{
461 $ 4.093
326 $ 7.148
759 $ 5.319
-~~~ f-~
1,366 $ 101,461
-r:~:;~_~ - FINALIZE PLANS, SPECIFICA nONS & BID DOCUMENTS . ~.. ~ . 1,0<<
A -in=-house -ReVIew :=:~~J:~:.::=i==~-=-~~:::==---=t::=:=::~i-=::=~~:t=~:~:~==:==t:==--==-~==:=t=:~=--===---i=--=~:.===-J---=I:===-~ 120 $ 14,196 $ $ $--15,940
s' -~- ~:~ 'ReYI-e~----- ----~----_._~-~ 36 $ 4,164 $ $ 759 $ '- 4.923
.._~----~ 4 I e I - J 16 i - ! _ ; _ I 8
C Finalize Docu-men~ :~:::!f=:+::==l}:=:=::-:i=::=~:::::~~::::=::::=F:=::=f~.:==:::F==::=:::::::-..::==~::=:=::--:=-+..:.=. : .=:::.+=~---.2r---~. 136 $ 16,176 $ $ 1.917 +__~_.!1!61.
0 ." "-CoSt-Esl~mate.----~-----~ ---- --.-------- 30 $ 3.636 $ ~303 $ 3.941
Subtotal 40 60 64 ! 100 ! 24 j I ! 44 322 $ 31,174 $ $ 4,092 $ 42,966
PROJECT TOTAL
208
62
252
212
476
284
36
168
Z \N"...6u'''',,~~\Fr''j:!<lut\C.ty "f e''''''''r1,,~\2CI00 Wat.r Mam ImPfo~.m"nl.l\8RI.4 _ 2006 Wale. Main Impr,,~.m.n15 _ Fee E'bm,t"..1a
7r2.ff2007.f;:9p1,4
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
BILL # 07- 223
Sf
DATE SUBMITTED: August 31, 2007
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Renewal of Annual Funding
Commitment to Admiral Theatre Foundation
Committee Meeting Date: 9/12/2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: 9/19/2007
Department: Financial Services
Presenter: Laura Lyon
Phone: 473-5722
SUMMARY: The City entered into a First Addendum to Operating Agreement with the Admiral
Theatre Foundation in December of2001 for the purposes of providing ongoing funding for the
operations of the Admiral Theatre and to clarify the conditions under which the continuation of
funding support would be provided. Provisions in this agreement call for the City Council to renew
its commitments to the $90,000/year funding amount every three years throughout the term of the
contract. The agreement anticipates that the commitment will be renewed after each three year
review, so long as the Foundation has used the funds in the manner anticipated and met the ongoing
requirements of the contract. A three year review of the contract has been recently completed by City
staff and it is the recommendation of the Director of Financial Services that the City Council renew
its commitment of the current funding amount of $90,000 per year.
A TT ACHMENTS: Explanatory Memo and Submitted Report from the Admiral Theatre
Foundation.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Ongoing commitment of $90,000 per year from
the City's collected hotel/motel tax. Adopted budgets have provided for this financial expectation.
APPROV ALS:
DEP ARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
CONSENT AGENDA ':R!
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to renew the City of Bremerton's commitment to the
Admiral Theatre Foundation per Contract No. 3223 in the amount of$90,000 per year subject to the
ongoing terms and conditions of the agreement.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
. .b _ ~_.
:m;......,...".^~i:i
, iii
. Iii
.. ~. i.!
,. ~ ,:!
': n
t ~~,~'''''"'''''-_~" "".' ,'-""""'~.,.1_l:..,111
"
Memorandum
To:
City Council Members
!
Mayor Cary Bozeman
From:
Laura Lyon, Director of Financial Services
Re:
Admiral Theatre Agreement - 3 Year Contract Review
Date:
August 29, 2007
In December of 2001 the City of Bremerton entered into the "First Addendum to
Operating Agreement with the Admiral Theatre Foundation" for the purposes of
providing ongoing funding for the operations of the Admiral Theatre and to clarify
the conditions under which the continuation of funding support would be
provided. The summarized terms of the agreement are as follows:
Term - Expires on September 27, 2040
Building Maintenance - The Foundation is solely responsible for maintaining
the theatre property and improvements therein in good condition. The City shall
have no responsibility for building maintenance, repairs, or damage to the
structure, except to the extent insurance proceeds are available to cover any
loss.
Financial Contribution - Commencing in calendar year 2002 the City shall pay
to the Foundation Ninety Thousand Dollars ($90,000.00) and a like amount each
and every year thereafter. Provided, however, the obligation to pay this amount
is conditioned upon the following:
a) The Foundation properly maintaining the Theatre and its facilities;
b) The Foundation continuing to market and provide performing and
visual arts at the Theatre on a full-time basis, including education
and cultural events;
c) The Foundation making available to the City all financial
information deemed appropriate to determine that the Theatre is
using its funds in accordance with its non-profit purpose and the
purpose of the City's existing agreements with the Foundation;
d) The Foundation providing to the City an external audit on a bi-
annual basis, commencing in 2003, and the results of that audit
showing no significant irregularity;
e) The City's hotel/motel tax generates at least $90,000 each year for
each 2% of tax imposed; and
f) The City Council, in 2004, and every three (3) years thereafter,
renews its commitment to the above referenced funding amount or
such other amount as it deems within the best interest of the City
and its citizens. It is anticipated that the $90,000 commitment will
be renewed after each three (3) year review, so long as the
Foundation has used the funds in a manner that the Council
deems as promoting the best interests of the City and its citizens
and the purposes of the Hotel/Motel tax enabling legislation.
The first three year review in 2004 was not conducted by the City as anticipated
by the terms of the agreement. It was noted in December of 2005 (while
updating the final payment schedule for the interagency loan between the City
and the Foundation) that this review was needed and the City Council directed
the Director of Financial Services to ensure that the required next three year
review (due in 2007) was completed. Accordingly, I have undertaken the review
performing the following steps in that process:
1. Reviewed the terms of the contract - noting conditions for
continued funding
2. Requested and received internally generated financial reports from
the Foundation for the previous 3 year period and the most recent
audited financials (year ended August 31, 2006)
3. Conducted an onsite interview and facilities walk through with Ruth
Enderle (Executive Director) and Brian Johnson (General
Manager) on June 27,2007.
4. Requested and received on July 6th a recap report from the
Foundation outlining actions taken to comply with the agreed upon
conditions, including a recap of events conducted in the facilities
over the past three year period (report attached)
5. Reviewed current Admiral Theatre Foundation website - noting
freshness of information and general program/event marketing
contained therein.
After reviewing the information collected, I have concluded the following:
a) Maintenance of the facilities appears to be adequate. Some repairs and
maintenance needs were noted, however, the most pressing items are
scheduled to be attended to before the end of 2007. Items to be
completed in 2007 include roof repairs, HV AC repair/upgrades; and sound
system upgrades. Noted but not immediately scheduled for attention is
the need to waterproof the exterior of the building.
b) Marketing and provision of performing visual arts (including education and
cultural events) have been increasing over the past three year period -
with the 2006-2007 season being the largest in offered events to date.
However, the theatre expects that the number of events each year will
likely remain at or near this current level - as each event requires set up
and tear down time and adding more events beyond the current level
would not allow adequate time for these activities. The theatre provides a
main stage season each year, as well as two film series, and a school day
2
series. A significant number of community events, private events, and
commercial events are also hosted each year. Complete listings of the
events offered and hosted were provided and reviewed in the conduct of
this contract review. The following is a recap of events offered and
marketed in the current three year period:
f~~I~~~::t~_~.--_-r~2-ii~_f~]~ 1~20a~ol
c) Financial information has been made available to the City as requested
and as deemed appropriate to determine that the Theatre is using funds in
accordance to Agreement expectations.
d) The Foundation provided to the City external audit reports when
requested. The audit report was prepared by Clarke Whitney, P.S.
Certified Public Accountants for the year ended August 31, 2006 and
included an unqualified opinion with no significant irregularities noted.
The terms of the Agreement require that the Foundation provide these
audited financials on a biannual basis. In practice, the reports were
readily provided upon request but have not routinely been submitted to the
City. In order to properly comply with the expectations of the Agreement,
the Foundation will be requested to place the City on an automatic
distribution list for audit reports and City staff will place a tickler in the
City's contract file to ensure receipt of such occurs.
e) The City's hotel/motel tax generated more than $90,000 each year for
each 2% of tax imposed. The following is the hotel/motel tax receipts for
the period 2002 through 2006:
Cit of Bremerton Lod
Year
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007 Bud et
in Tax Recei ts
Amount
$ 255,395
$ 203,140
$ 256,068
$ 317,825
$ 333,577
$ 300,000
Based upon the results of this review and given that the Agreement expressly
anticipates that the $90,000 commitment will be renewed after each three (3)
year review, so long as the Foundation has used the funds in a manner that the
Council deems as promoting the best interests of the City and its citizens and the
purposes of the Hotel/Motel tax enabling legislation - it is my recommendation
that the City Council renew its commitment to the current funding amount
of $90,000/year with staff to conduct the next three year review in 2010.
Attachment - July 6, 2007 Summary Report Submitted by Admiral Theatre Foundation
CC: Ruth Enderle, Executive Director of the Admiral Theatre
3
July 6, 2007
A.:\, fi\l.... ~{rt It R!,~ A~ II
, ': 1V~.;l"~~l ~." t1\ II
" ",""I:; ". ,.,. ",.~ <it ,1I>.
' '~~". ,~, -- "L
r () r :\ n ,\
BO;;PD ,:'F D1Rb':TORS
Joanne Haselwood, Chairman
Jerry Reid, President
Donna Gay Boyle, Vice Pl'esldent
Lon Johnson, Vice President
Judith Rammel, Vice President
Earle Smith, Secretary
Greg Meyer, Treasurer
Ruth Enderle, Executlv'= Director
Bryant Arnoid
Brian Buskirk
LOUise c"amer
Kyle Cruver
Michael Huey, DMD
Kyle Kincaid
Leslie Krueger
Abrahilm Laners
Vickie Levi
Patncia J. Lund
Marilyn Mantzke
Paul McCullough, MD
Norman McLoughlin
John Mitchell
Rodney B. Near
Sean Olmsted
Kimberly Ruona, DDS
Tim Ryan
Gussie Schaeffer
Helen Langer Smith
Ed Wolfe
11-1 f'H:M()f,i"\1~1/ FCU~ir)lN(, CHAiR
A, H. "Ike" Pal'ker
H{JNiJrUJ.r~Y Fur-.j[.rr<AlSINC C)1AJR
Congressman Norm Dicks
THf- Aor''I!RAL Tdf-,1.fR!: REcrIVFS Gf:NfRGUS
SUPPORT FROM THE CrTY OF Br<EHERTON
M-lG K1TSAP COUNTY.
CITV ell: Bf{~rif:fnON
Mayor Cary Bozeman
Cr fY COlJNlJL
Will Maupin, PreSident (Dlst 8)
Brad Gehnng, Vice President (Dist 1)
Cecil McConnell (Dlst 2)
Adam C. Brockus (Dist 3)
W8ndy Priest (Dlst 4)
Mlk8 Shept;E'rd (Dist 5)
Dianne Robinson (Dlst 6)
Carol Arends (Dist 7)
Nick Wofford (Dist 9)
Kirs/.p CG1J~~TY
SOAfeD Of C()r.lI"1rSSiDU~~c,
ChriS Enc1resen, Chalf
Jan Angel
Josh Brown
--
-----",
Laura Lyon, Director of Financial Services
City of Bremerton
345 Sixth Street, Suite 600
Bremerton, Washington 98337
Dear Ms. Lyon:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me regarding the agreement
between the Admiral Theatre Foundation and the City of Bremerton. On behalf
of the Admiral Theatre Foundation Board of Directors, the following report is
submitted for your review. As our fiscal year ends on August 31, the information
presented covers the period beginning September 1, 2004 through today's date,
with projections through August 31, 2007.
FACILITY -
The Foundation has kept the Admiral Theatre building in excellent condition. As
we begin our tenth season, the theatre is requiring work in several major areas
including: roof repair; HVAC repair/upgrades; sound system upgrades and
exterior waterproofing. It is expected that roof repair, HVAC repair and sound
system upgrades will be completed by September 2007.
In 2005, the Foundation purchased the building adjacent to the theatre on the
west side and invested more than $2 million to connect the two buildings and
create a backstage and loading area, production work spaces, artist dressing
rooms and a multi-purpose community room.
FINANCE -
The Foundation budget has grown only slightly in the past three years, due to
the Board's policy of responsible fiscal management. The current year budget
is $1.3 million. As compared with other theatres in the region, the Admiral
Theatre is in extremely good financial condition and operates efficiently. It
receives less than 10% of its budget from public sources - a notable exception
among Washington State theatres. Staff is often asked to lead seminars and
workshops on funding and budget issues and the Admiral Theatre is well known
515 Pacific Avenue · Bremerton, Washington 98337 . (360) 373-6810. FAX (360) 405-0673
www.admiraltheatre.org
Laura Lyon, Director of Financial Services
City of Bremerton
July 6, 2007
Page 2
and respected throughout the region for its ability to offer quality and affordability to the
community.
One measure of theatre quality is the fees paid to professional artists each season.
The Admiral Theatre spends more than $300,000 each season to bring professional
performances to Bremerton. This risk is completely underwritten by sponsors.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS -
The Admiral Theatre Foundation is fortunate to have some of the most influential businiess
and civic leaders as its Board members. They are responsible for setting policy, financial
oversight and raising more than $600,000 annually to support the theatre's program.
The Board of Directors includes two CPAs, two attorneys, 15 business owners, 5 banking/
investment professionals, one marketing professional, 29 committed community supporters,
and Congressman Norm Dicks as Honorary Fundraising Chairman.
Each and every Board member honors the Foundation's Vision and Mission Statement,
which are:
VISION STATEMENT
The Admiral Theatre is a symbol of the pride we hold in our
West Sound community.
MISSION STATEMENT
The Admiral Theatre Foundation pledges that the Admiral Theatre shall be
the primary link in the encouragement and development of the cultural, civic
and entertainment horizons of the entire West Puget Sound.
The principles upon which we shall make all our decisions are based in the
following core values:
A well-equipped and well-maintained
performing arts facility for community use
Presentation of a selection of arts performances
to meet the needs of the community
Responsiveness to the needs and interests
of local arts and community groups
Operation that is fiscally responsible
Laura Lyon, Director of Financial Services
City of Bremerton
July 6, 2007
Page 3
OPERATIONS -
The theatre presents a mainstage season each year, as well as two film series, and a
schoolday series. It also hosts a large number of community events, private events and
commercial events each year. Following is the event history for the period:
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
Presented Events
62
62
75
Client Events
35
38
49
TOTAL
97
100
124
As each event requires set up and tear down time, it is likely the number of events each
year will remain at or near the current level.
The Admiral Theatre Foundation is grateful for the support of the City of Bremerton and
pledges to continue to provide service to the community which represents an excellent
return on investment and which adds irreplaceable value to the lifestyle of our citizens.
submitted,
~
Ruth Enderle
Executive Director
cc: Mayor Cary Bozeman, City of Bremerton
Gary Sexton, City of Bremerton Economic Development
Congressman Norm Dicks
Enclosures:
Board of Directors Roster
Independent Auditor's Report and Financial Statements, August 31, 2006
Income and Expense Statements for Fiscal Years 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07
Event Lists for 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07
DA TE SUBMITTED: September 5, 2007
BILL#
07-:) ~ <f
6,A
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 50;).3
amending BMC Chapter 11.02 relating to
Right-Of-Way Use.
Committee Meeting Date: September 12,2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 19, 2007
Department: PW&U, Engineering
Presenter: Michael Mecham
Phone: 473-5288
SUMMARY: Chapter 11.02 of the BMC discusses the issuance of right-of-way use permits. The
proposed amendment emphasizes and clarifies the need for traffic control plans in construction areas
of City streets and clarifies the language concerning deposits and performance bonds.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Summary; 2. Proposed Ordinance NO' 5o.2.~
FISCAL IMP ACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
APPROVALS:
DEP ARTMENT DIRECTOR.
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
...
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
I} F -1)"
~~/k<<-:--
.-4 --. /
CONSENT AGENDA D
GENERAL BUSINESSN
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve Ordinance No. 5oJ., amending BMC Chapter 11.02.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
COUNCIL SUMMARY
AMENDMENTS TO BMC CHAPTER 11.02
SUMMARY
We have been using Chapter 11.02 of the BMC as written for several years. As we have applied
this chapter of the BMC, we have realized there are some revisions that would make the
enforcement easier for both the City and the Citizens. The following is a summary of the
reVISIOns:
1. All permits shall have a traffic control plan submitted with the application. Proper traffic
control is necessary to protect the traveling public when they enter a construction zone.
2. Construction of irrigation systems and landscaping in the right-of-way planter strip is
exempt. When a homeowner is working in this area there is typically no danger to the
public using the right-of-way
3. The permittee shall pay for parking stalls they use for construction activities in the
downtown area that are pay stalls.
4. The contractor shall have a bond for 150% of the cost to restore improvements in the
public right-of-way. Warranty bonds shall be required.
City of Bremerton
Amendment of BMC Chapter 11.02
September 2007
ORDINANCE NO. 5D;}.3
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 11.02 of the
Bremelion Municipal Code entitled "Right-Of-Way Use".
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update various provisions relating to
right-of-way use; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 11.02.040 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Definitions" relating to right-of-way use is hereby amended to read as follows:
11.02.040 DEFINITIONS.
The following words and phrases when used in this chapter shall have the following
meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
A. "Citation and notice" means a written document initiating a proceeding pursuant
to Chapter 1.12 BMC.
B. "City inspector" means the designated employee(s) ofthe Department of Public
Works and Utilities assigned to inspecting the permitted work.
C. "City" means the City of Bremerton, Washington.
D. "Complaint" means a written document initiating a procedure pursuant to Chapter
1.12 BMC.
E. "Department" means the Public Works and Utilities Department or other
Department designated by the Mayor.
F. "Director" means the Director of Public Works and Utilities or his/her designated
representative.
G. "Emergency" means a condition of imminent danger to the health, safety, and
welfare of property or persons located within the City including, but not limited to, damage to
persons or property from natural or manmade consequences, such as storms, earthquakes, riots or
wars.
H. "Enforcement Officer" means the Director or his/her designated representative.
1. "Engineering Division" means the Engineering Division of the Department.
1. "Franchised utilities" means utilities that have City approval to use City rights-of-
way for the purpose of providing their services within or beyond the City, whether by written
franchise granted by the City, State tariff or other similar City authorization.
K. "Notice of violation" means a document mailed to a permittee or unauthorized
user and posted at the site of a nonconforming or unsafe condition.
L. "Oral directive" means a directive given orally by City persOlmel designated by
the Director to correct or discontinue a specific condition.
M. "Permit" means a document issued by the City granting pennission to engage in
an activity not allowed without a permit.
N. "Permit Center" means the location for applying for permits.
1
Right-Of-Way Use
O. "Pem1ittee" means the person so designated on the pennit application, or
designee.
P. "Person" means and includes corporations, companies, associations, joint stock
companies or associations, firms, partnerships, limited liability companies and individuals and
includes their lessors, tmstees and receivers.
Q. "Private use" means use of the public right-of-way for the benefit of a person,
partnership, group, organization, company, or corporation, other than as a thoroughfare for any
type of vehicles, pedestrians or equestrians.
R. "Policy" means a policy adopted by the Director to implement this chapter, or to
carry out other responsibilities as may be required by this chapter or by other codes, ordinances,
or resolutions of the City or other agencies.
S. "Revocation" means the cancellation of a permit.
T. "Right-of-way" means all public streets and property granted or reserved for, or
dedicated to, public use for street purposes, together with public property granted or reserved for,
or dedicated to, public use for walkways, sidewalks, bikeways, parking, and horse trails, whether
improved or unimproved, including the air rights, sub-surface rights and easements related
thereto.
U. "Stop work order" means an oral directive or a written notice posted at the site of
activity that requires all work to be stopped until the City approves continuation of work.
V. "Suspension" means the temporary stay of a permit.
W. "Underground location service" means the underground utilities location center
that will locate all underground utilities prior to an excavation.
X. "Unsafe condition" means any condition which the Director determines is a
hazard to health, or endangers the safe use ofthe right-of-way by the public, or does or may
impair or impede the operation or functioning of any portion of the right-of-way, or which may
cause damage thereto.
SECTION 2. Section 11.02.090 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Applications and Processing of Permits" relating to right-of-way use is hereby amended to read
as follows:
11.02.090 APPLICATIONS AND PROCESSING OF PERMITS.
A. To obtain a right-of-way use permit the applicant shall file an application with the
Department.
B. Every application shall include the following information appropriate to the
proposed use:
1. A scale drawing showing the location of the proposed right-of-way use,
the location of the existing and proposed improvements, surface features such as curbs and
gutters, underground features such as the location of utilities, and the limits of the work area;
2. A description of the use;
3. The planned duration of the use;
4. Applicant contact information;
5. All other information which may be required as specified in policies
adopted hereunder;
6.
76.
Construction traffic control plan;
An estimate of construction costs; and
2
Right-Of-Way Use
~-1. Payment of the required fees.
C. The Director shall examine each application submitted for review and approval to
detennine if adequate inforn1ation is provided and if it complies with the applicable provisions of
this chapter and procedures adopted hereunder. Other departments that have authority over the
proposed use activity will review and recommend approval or disapproval of the application. If
the Director finds that the application conforms to the requirements of this chapter, he may
approve the permit, and may impose such conditions thereon as are reasonably necessary to
protect the public health, welfare and safety, to mitigate any impacts resulting from the use and
to coordinate activities or address potential conflicts with future improvements in the area.
D. All applications for permits must be submitted 10 working days or more prior to
the start of work or as required to obtain other City permits.
E. Upon submittal of a completed application the applicant shall provide the
application fee per the fee schedule adopted by the City. Permittees who have an approved
monthly billing status shall be billed accordingly.
SECTION 3. Section 11.02.110 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Permit Exception" relating to right-of-way use is hereby amended to read as follows:
11.02.110 PERMIT EXCEPTION.
A. A right-of-way use permit shall not be required of franchised utilities when
responding to emergencies that require disturbance of the right-of-way typical of a Type B
permit provided, that the Department shall be notified by the responding utility or contractor
verbally or in writing, as soon as practicable following onset of an emergency. Nothing herein
shall relieve a responding utility or contractor from the requirement to apply for a right-of-way
use permit as provided in this chapter within 48 hours after beginning emergency work in the
right-of-way.
B. Permits shall not be required for routine maintenance and construction work
performed by the City.
C. Permits are not required for City Public Works and Utility Department
construction projects.
D. Permits are not required for the ordinary construction and maintenance of
landscaping or irrigation systems in the planter strip of the right-of-way. Blockage of the right-
of-way associated with ordinary maintenance oflandscaping requires the appropriate permit.
SECTION 4. Section 11.02.190 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Warning and Safety Devices" relating to right-of-way use is hereby amended to read as follows:
11.02.190 WARNING AND SAFETY DEVICES.
A. The permittee is responsible for the safety of the work area and shall provide and
maintain warning lights, safety devices, signs and barricades shall be provided by the permittee
on all rights-of-way when at any time there might be an obstruction or hazard to vehicular or
pedestrian traffic in accordance with the Specifications. Warning and safety devices may be
removed when the work for which the right-of-way use permit has been granted is complete and
the right-of-way restored to the conditions directed by the Department.
B. The Director may require an applicant te-shall submit a traffic plan showing the
proposed shoulder closures, lane closures, detour routing, parking removal and location and type
3
Right-Of-Way Use
of waming lights, safety devices, signs and barricades intended to protect vehicular or pedestrian
traffic at the site for which the right-of-way use permit is requested. If a traffic plan is required,
ne-No work in the right-of-way use pennit will be issued allowed until the traffic plan is
approved.
C. The Director may require that the permittee provide a person certified as a
Washington State Traffic Control Flagger be on site during construction activities to monitor the
setup and maintenance of the waming and safety devices.
D. On right-of-way use permits that require a flagger for the purpose of traffic
control during the construction, the flagger will be either a properly attired and certified
Washington State Traffic Control Flagger, or an off-duty law enforcement officer.
E. All decisions of the City inspector shall be final in all matters pertaining to the
number, type, location, installation, and maintenance ofwaming and safety devices in the public
right-of-way during any actual work or activity for which a duly authorized right-of-way use
permit has been issued. Lack of notice or comment by the City on the waming and safety devices
does not relieve the permittee of responsibility for the safety of the work area.
SECTION 5. Section 11.02.200 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Temporary Parking Restriction Notification" relating to right-of-way use is hereby amended to
read as follows:
11.02.200 TEMPORARY PARKING RESTRICTION NOTIFICATION.
A. Where the Director determines that parking is a hazard to through traffic, or to the
construction work or other right-of-way activity, parking may be restricted either entirely or
during the time when it creates a hazard.
B. Parking restriction signs shall be placed at least 72 hours in advance of parking
removal, with the start date of the "no parking" clearly shown. The area to berestricted shall be
clearly marked with Type I barricades carrying signs that give the specific period (dates and
times) that the area is to be free of vehicles. Signs shall be large enough to be easily read from a
distance of 50 feet and shall advise where impounded vehicles will be stored or indicate a 24-
hour telephone number for obtaining that information.
C. The permittee shall be responsible for placement and maintenance of the signs.
Placement of the signs shall be as approved by the Director. The permittee shall notify the Gity
Director by telephone or otherwise when the signs are placed. No towing of vehicles shall occur
unless the signs are placed at least 72 hours prior to the beginning of the restricted parking.
D. All signs must be approved by the Director prior to placement, and must conform
generally to the following wording:
WARNING! TOW AWAY ZONE
NO PARKING
FROM: DATE & TIME
TO: DATE & TIME
FOR CONSTRUCTION WORK
ALL VEHICLES REMAINING WILL BE TOWED
(IMPOUND INFORMATION)
E. In areas where parking spaces must be used in which fees are collected by the
City for parking. the applicant shall pay the appropriate fees for uses of the parking spaces. No
permit shall be issued until the applicant shows proof of payment for the parking spaces.
4
Right-Of-Way Use
SECTION 6. Section 11.02.210 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Materials Testing" relating to right-of-way use is hereby amended to read as follows:
11.02.210 MATERIALS TESTING.
Material tests may be ordered by the Director to assure conformity with the
specifications. Material tests may include, but are not limited to: gradation analysis, compaction
testing, concrete strength, asphalt content analysis and pipe strength. When ordered by the
Director, the permittee shall have the material test performed by a certified laboratory and the
results provided to the GttyDirector. Location and timing of material testing shall be coordinated
with the Director.
SECTION 7. Section 11.02.220 ofthe Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Performance and Warranty Deposits" relating to right-of-way use is hereby amended to read as
follows:
11.02.220 PERFORMANCE AND WARRANTY DEPOSITS.
A. Performance Deposit. A performance deposit may-shall be required to ensure
conformance with the plans, specifications, standards, permit requirements, development
guidelines and other requirements. The minimum amount of the performance deposit shall be
150% of the estimated value of the work er-and the estimated cost to repair damagerestore
existing improvements as determined by the Director. Performance deposits shall not be released
until a warranty deposit, if required, is received.
B. Warranty Deposit. A warranty deposit may-shall be required to warrant the
workmanship and material of constructed improvements in the right-of-way for a period of two
years. The minimum amount of the warranty deposit shall be twenty (20) percent of the value of
the actual construction costs.
C. Deposit Instruments. The deposit instrument for the performance or warranty
deposit shall be cash, a non-revocable letter of credit, an assignment of funds, bond or other
readily accessible source of funds approved by the City Risk Manager. The deposit instruments
shall be on a form acceptable to the City Risk Manager. Any issuer of a deposit instrument shall
pay invoices presented by the City pursuant to this chapter within forty-five (45) days. A bond
will be accepted only for amounts over one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or when State law
requires a bond.
Interest on deposited funds will accrue to the benefit ofthe depositor, except that any
interest earned on a cash deposit will be retained by the City for account administration.
D. Notice oflncomplete or Defective Work. If the permitted work is determined to
be incomplete or defective, damage of existing improvements is observed, a defect is observed
during the warranty period or other activities which do not comply with the permit and require
corrective action by the permittee as determined by the Director, the Director shall notify the
applicant in writing prior to applying proceeds of the deposit to correct the work. The notice
must state:
1. The work that must be done or the improvement that must be made to
comply with the requirements of the permit or deposit; and
2. The amount of time that the applicant has to commence and complete the
required work or improvements; and
5
Right-Of-Way Use
3. That, if the work or improvements are not commenced and completed
within the time specified, the City will use the proceeds of the deposit to have the required work
or improvements completed.
E. Default on Deposit.
1. If the work or improvements covered by the deposit are not completed
within the time specified in the notice given under this chapter, the City shall obtain the proceeds
of the deposit and do the work or make the improvements covered by the deposit. The City may
either have employees of the City do the work or make the improvements or have a contractor do
the work or make the improvements.
2. If at any time the Director determines that actions or inaction associated
with any permit work has created an emergency situation endangering the public health, safety,
or welfare, creating a potential liability for the City, or endangering City streets, utilities, or
property; and if the nature or timing of such an emergency precludes the notification of
applicants as provided in this chapter while still minimizing or avoiding the effects of the
emergency, the City may use the deposit to cover costs incurred by the City to correct the
emergency situation. The City may either have employees of the City do the work or make the
improvements, or have a contractor do the work or make the improvements. If the City uses the
deposit as provided by this section, the applicant shall be notified in writing within four (4)
working days of the commencement of emergency work. The notice must state the work that was
completed and the nature or timing of the emergency that necessitated the use ofthe deposit
without prior notification.
3. The permittee is responsible for all costs incurred by the City in doing the
work and making the improvements covered by the deposit. The City shall release or refund any
proceeds of a deposit remaining after subtracting all costs for doing the work covered by the
deposit. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any amount expended by the City that
exceeds the deposit.
4. In each case where the City uses any of the proceeds of the deposit, it
shall, within thirty (30) days, provide the owner of the permit an itemized statement of all
proceeds and funds used.
SECTION 8. Section 11.02.260 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"Nuisance in the Right-Of-Way" relating to right-of-way use is hereby amended to read as
follows:
11.02.260 NUISANCE IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
A. Debris and Spilled Loads.
1. The owner or operator of any vehicle that has spilled, dropped, dumped or
in any manner whatsoever deposited any matter ("debris") upon the right-of-way shall cause the
right-of-way to be cleaned using suitable methods to the satisfaction ofthe DepartmentDirector.
Upon failure to do so the Department Director may cause to have cleaned the right-of-way and
the costs thereof shall be charged to the person or persons so responsible. The Department has
the authority to designate haul routes and time of day for operations involving hauling over
public right-of-way.
2. Earth-hauling contractors, builders, or anyone else utilizing vehicles upon
rights-of-way shall provide persons or equipment to keep the right-of-way clean at all times to
the satisfaction of the Department. Upon failure to do so, the Department may issue an
6
Right-Of-Way Use
immediate stop work order, revoke City permits, and the responsible person or persons may be
directed to immediately clean the right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Department. Upon
failure to do so the Department may cause to have cleaned the right-of-way and charge the costs
thereof to the person or persons so responsible.
B. Unauthorized Property.
1. Any object, equipment, structure, or personal property ("property") which
occupies any right-of-way without the legal authorization required by this chapter is declared a
nuisance. The Department may attach a notice to any such property stating that if it is not
removed from the right-of-way within twenty-four (24) hours of the date and time stated on the
notice, the property may be taken into custody and stored at the owner's expense. The notice
shall provide an address and phone number where additional information may be obtained. If the
property is a hazard to public safety, it may be removed summarily by the City. Notice of such
removal shall be thereafter given to the owner, ifknown.
2. All expenses incurred by the City in abating the nuisance condition or any
portion thereof, or to repair any damage to the right-of-way, shall constitute a civil debt owing to
the City jointly and severally by such persons who have been given notice or who own the
property or placed it in the right-of-way, which debt shall be collectable in the same manner as
any other civil debt.
C. Enforcement. If the nuisance debris or property has not been removed or
remedied as directed above or in lieu of the above, the Director may seek enforcement pursuant
to BMC 11.02.320.
SECTION 9. Severability. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 10. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the
day of
, 2007
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
Approved this
day of
,2007
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
7
Right-Of-Way Use
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
P AULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the
EFFECTIVE the
ORDINANCE NO.
day of
day of
,2007
,2007
R:\Legal\LegaI\Ordinances\Public Works & Utilities\Right of Way Use Ordinance.07.24.07.doc
8
Right-Ol-Way Use
BILL #
()7- 22-5
DATE SUBMITTED: September 19, 2007
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
(bB
........................................................................................
Committee Meeting Date: ~c-e. - Co v nc\ \ 9./1 q /07
COUNCIL MEETING Date: September 19,2007
Department: Public Works &
Utilities
Presenter: Phil Williams
Phone: 473-5315
SUBJECT: Former Chevron Property
Agreed Order with Washington Department
of Ecology
SUlVIMARY: The City has received the final Agreed Order from the Washington Department of
Ecology for conducting a remedial investigation/feasibility study and interim action plan in order to
develop a final cleanup action plan of the former Chevron property.
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Agreed Order for Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study and
Interim Action
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The total cost of remediation of the Chevron
Property is estimated to be $2.7 million. It is expected that the City will be reimbursed for at least
75% of this cost which would leave the City's expense as $675,000.
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
/I!?~~.-
CONSENT AGENDA 0
GENERAL BUSINESS ~
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Agreed Order for RerQ-CJW,\q..v-.eG
Investigation/Feasibility Study and Interim Action and authorize the Mayol~o execu'te the order with
substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
/
/
COUNCIL ACTION: ~pprove 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
ST ATE OF WASHINGTON
DEP.4.RTMENT OF ECOLOGY
In the Matter of Remedial Action by:
AGREED ORDER for REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY
and INTERIM ACTION - Chevron Tank Farm
Port Washington Narrows
CHEVRON TANK FARM PORT
WASHINGTON NARROWS
No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
TO: The City of Bremerton
Public Works Department
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, Washington 98310
r [~'~.~ ;":,;-..,:,,,' ~,._.t,.,::-;,..~~.'.' ~ l: 3 M ~ <l\
:. ~~ ~""~_;, . ~ '\ii"I:' [)
AUG :3 0 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i?'"'-> H'f ,.,..~.[ R~< ", ,..~.. .
~...~'? \J~ ...J!t;r1 ;l~rfc~r~
Cit.,{ l\ttnrnt:'.\!;~ rtfni~"""
1 . ~ _k.. \......, '"" ....!..l:"'W'~"-
I. INTRODUCTION ............ .................................................................... ........................ .........3
II. JURISD ICTTON ........................................................................ ................. ........................ ...3
III. PARTIES BOUND................................................................................... .... ........ .......... .......3
IV. DEFINITIONS.............................. ................. ........................... ............................................3
V. FINDINGS OF FACT.............. .......... .......... ......... ....................... ........... .............. ........ ..... ...4
VI. ECOLOGY DETERMINA nONS..... ............. ............................. ..... ............. .......................6
VII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED ....................... ..... ..... ............................ .............. .................. 8
VIII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ORDER .................................................................. ..... ...8
A. Public Notice........................ ............ .............................................................................. 8
,B. Remedial Action Costs........................................................................................ .......... 9
C. Implementation of Remedial Action..............................................................................9
D. Designated Project Coordinators.................. ........................................... ........... .........10
E. Performance .................................................. ...............................................................1 0
F. Access............................................................................................................ ............ ..II
G. Sampling, Data Submittal, and Availability............ ........ ............................................12
H. Public Participation..................................................................................................... .12
I. Retention of Records................................................................................................... .14
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 2 of21
J. Resolution of Disputes. ....... .......... ............... .............................................................. ..14
K. Extension of Schedule... ............................ ...................... ............................................ .15
L. Amendment of Order... ...... ........... .......... ........... .......... ......... ............. ........................ ..16
M. Endangerment........... .... .............. .......................................................................... .......17
N. Reservation of Rights.......... ............................ ...................................... ....... ................17
O. Transfer of Interest in Property .............................. ............................................... ..... ..18
P. Compliance with Applicable Laws............................ .......................... .............. ..........19
Q. Indemnification ........................ ... ...... ..................... ............... .......... ..... ........ ..... ......... ..20
IX. SATISFACTION OF ORDER ................................ ............................................................20
X. ENFORCEMENT ...............................................................................................................20
EXHIBIT - A Site Diagram
EXHIBIT - B Scope of Work, Wark Plan & Schedule
EXHIBIT -C Applicable, Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
EXHIBIT -D Policy 840 (Data Submittal Requirements)
A TT ACHMENT -1 June 2005, Due Diligence Investigation
ATTACHMENT-2 Groundwater Monitoring Results (1988 through 2003)
ATTACHMENT-3 March 1994, Supplemental Soil Investigation Results
ATTACHMENT-4 November 1991, Soil Vapor Extraction System Results
ATTACHMENT-5 July 1991, Site Hazard Assessment Results
ATTACHMENT-6 March 1989, Soil investigation Results induding some Product
Recovery
A TT ACHMENT -7 November 1988, Soil and Groundwater Investigation Results
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 3 of 21
I. INTRODUCTION
The mutual objective of the State of Washington, Department of Ecology (Ecology) and
the City of Bremerton (the City) under this Agreed Order (Order) is to provide for remedial
action at a facility where there has been a release or threatened release of hazardous substances.
This Order requires the City to conduct a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RIfFS) to
collect, develop and evaluate sufficient information to develop a final cleanup action plan (CAP)
for the Site, and to prepare a draft CAP. In addition, the City is required by this Order to conduct
an appropriate interim action to address the contaminated soils. Ecology believes the actions
required by this Order are in the public interest.
II. JURISDICTION
This Agreed Order IS issued pursuant to the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA),
RCW 70.105D.050(1).
III. PARTIES BOUND
This Agreed Order shall apply to and be binding upon the Parties to this Order, their
successors and assigns. The undersigned representative of each party hereby certifies that he or
. she is fully authorized to enter into this Order and to execute and legally bind such party to
comply with this Order. The City agrees to. undertake all actions required by the terms and
conditions of this Order. The City shall provide a copy of this Order to all agents, contractors,
and subcontractors retained to perform work required by this Order, and shall ensure that all
work undertaken by such agents, contractors, and subcontractors complies with this Order.
IV. DEFINITIONS
Unless otherwise specified herein, the definitions set forth in Chapter 70.1 05D RCW and
Chapter 173-340 WAC shall control the meanings of the terms in this Order.
A. Site: The Site is referred to as Chevron Tank Farm Port Washington Narrows and
is generally located at 1310 Highland Avenue in Bremerton, Washington 98310. The Site is
defined by the extent of contamination caused by the release of hazardous substances at the Site.
Based upon factors currently known to Ecology, the Site is more particularly described in
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 4 of21
Exhibit A to this Order, which includes a detailed Site diagram and the location map. The Site
constitutes a Facility under RCW 70.105D.020(4).
B. Parties: Refers to the State of Washington, Department of Ecology and the City
of Bremerton.
C. Potentially Liable Person (PLP): Refers to the City of Bremerton.
D. Agreed Order or Order:. Refers to this Order and each of the exhibits to this
Order. All exhibits are integral and enforceable parts of this Order. The terms "Agreed Order"
or "Order" shall include all exhibits to this Order.
v. FINDINGS OF FACT
Ecology makes the following findings of fact, without any express or implied admissions
of such facts by the City:
A. The Chevron Tank Farm Port Washington Narrows site (the "Site") is located at
1310 Highland Avenue, Bremerton, Washington (the "Property") and consists of approximately
1.5-acres. The Property is bounded on the northeast by the Port Washington Narrows, on the
northwest by a small inlet (Smith Cove), on the southeast by a residential area and on the
southwest by a mixed residential and business area. (Exhibit-A). From approximately 1950 until
1988, Chevron operated a bulk storage and distribution center for petroleum products on the
property, including a fuel distribution dock.
E. Currently the City of Bremerton owns the Property and it is a vacant piece of
land. (Exhibit-A).
C. In June 2005, Parametrix conducted a Due Diligence Investigation for the City of
. Bremerton to evaluate the then-current conditions at the Site.' The evaluation included a
comprehensive summary of site investigation, previous remediation efforts, data gaps, additional
investigations, a number of potential remedial alternatives and recommendations for the
property's acquisition. (Attachment-1).
D. Eighteen groundwater monitoring wells were placed on the site; sixteen remain.
From October 1988 to October 2003, a total of thirty-one rounds of quarterly, semiannual and/or
annual groundwater sampling have been conducted at the site. All of these groundwater samples
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 5 of21
were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons-gasoline (TPH-G), TPH-diesel (TPH-D), TPH-
Oil (TPH-O), benzene, ethylebenzene, toluene, xylenes (BETX) and dissolved lead. Results of
the latest round of groundwater sampling (October 2003) showed elevated concentrations of
TPH-G (9,000 ug/l), TPH-D (32,000 ug/l), TPH-O (5,200ug/l) and benzene (700 ug/l). These
concentrations exceed MTCA Method-A cleanup levels of 800 ug/l (TPH-G), 500 ug/l (TPH-D
and TPH-O) and 5 ug/l (benzene). (Attachment-2).
E. In March 1994, Chevron Company conducted a Supplemental Site Assessment.
As a part of this investigation, nine soil borings were drilled and six borings were converted into
groundwater monitoring wells. A total of thirteen soil samples were selected and sent to an off-
site laboratory for TPH-G, TPH-D, TPH-O, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) and total
lead analysis. Some of the soil samples showed elevated concentrations of TPH-G (1,300
mg/kg), TPH-D (11,000 mg/kg) and PAH range of 1.2 mg/kg to 24 mg/kg. These concentrations
exceed MTCA Method-A cleanup levels of 100 mg/kg, 2,000 mg/kg and 0.1 mg/kg (prorated to
benzo(a)pyrene with toxicity equivalent factors). (Attachment-3).
F. In November of 1991, Hart Crowser (Chevron's consultant) installed a soil vapor
extraction (SVE) system to remove the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the soils. The
system included eleven dedicated extraction wells and five groundwater monitoring wells. The
SVE system was operated from November 1991 through December 1994. Because of the low
VOC recovery the system was turned off in December 1994. During this period a total of
approximately 195,000 pounds of VOCs were extracted and the thickness of product was
reduced in some of the groundwater monitoring wells. (Attachment-4).
G. In July 1991, Ecology conducted a site hazard assessment investigation. As a part
of this investigation groundwater, sediment and shellfish samples were collected. These samples
were analyzed for TPH-G, TPH-D, BTEX, semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and total
lead. Groundwater results showed: total TPH (5,660 ug/l), benzene (2,420 ug/l), toluene (4,390
ug/l) and nitrobenzene (152 cug/l). Results of sediment samples (all compounds) were below
their practical quantitation limits (PQL). Since PQLs were higher than the Sediment
Management Standards, it does not preclude the presence of these compounds in the sediments
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 6 of21
exceeding the marine Sediment Management Standards. In addition, total TPH (100 mg/kg -
412 mg/kg), xylene (78 ug/kg - 103 uglkg) and lead (11.3 mg/kg - 53.3 mg/kg) were also
detected in sediment samples. (Attachment-5).
H. In May 1989, Chevron conducted soil investigation and Phase-l remediation
(some product removal). Nine test pits were excavated and a total of eighteen (18) soil sanlples
were collected for TPH-G, TPH-D and total hydrocarbon identification (HCID) analysis.
Elevated levels of TPH-G (25,000 mg/kg) and TPH-D (5,800 mg/kg) were detected in soil
samples. In addition, measurement of free phase hydrocarbon thickness revealed the presence of
approximately 3 to 4 feet of free product at certain locations on the site. A total of 47 gallons of
free product was removed during a period of one year. (Attachment-6).
1. In November 1988, Chevron conducted a soil and groundwater investigation. As
a part of this investigation,. twelve (12) exploratory borings and seven (7) test pits were installed
and a total of seventeen (17) soil samples were collected for TPH-G, TPH-D and BTEX analysis.
Elevated levels of TPH-G (4,300 mg/kg), TPH-D (17,000 mg/kg), benzene (3.4 mg/kg), toluene
(15 mg/kg), ethylbenzene (3.1 mg/kg) and xylenes (12.4 mg/kg) were detected exceeding their
MTCA Method-A cleanup levels of respectively, 30 mg/kg, 2,000 mg.kg, 0.03 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg,
6 mg/kg and 9 mg/kg. (Attachment-7).
Nine of the above-mentioned twelve borings were converted into groundwater
monitoring wells and groundwater samples were collected for total petrolewn hydrocarbon
(TPH) and BTEX analysis. TPH, BTEX concentrations of 1,742 ug/l, 6100 ug/l, 19,000 ug/l,
2900 ug/l and 23,000 ug/l were detected respectively. These concentrations exceed MTCA
Method-A cleanup levels of 800 ugll (TPH), 5 ug/l (benzene), 1000 ug/l (toluene and xylenes)
and 700 ug/l (ethylbenzene) (Attachment-7).
VI. ECOLOGY DETERMINATIONS
A. The City is an "owner or operator" as defined in RCW 70.105D.020(12), of a
"facility" as defined in RCW 70.105D.020(4) because it is the current ovmer of the Site.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 7 of21
B. Based upon all factors known to Ecology, a "release" or "threatened release" of
"hazardous substance(s)" as defined in RCW 70.105D.020(20) and RCW 70.l05D.020(7),
respectively, has occurred at the Site.
C. Based upon credible evidence, Ecology issued a PLP status letter to the City dated
October 25, 2006, pursuant to RCW 70.1 05D.040, -.020(16) and WAC 173-340-500. By letter
dated October 27, 2006, the City voluntarily waived its rights to notice and comment and
accepted Ecology's determination that the City is a PLP under RCW 70.105D.040. Ecology
notified the City of this determination by letter dated October 31, 2006.
D. Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.030(1) and -.050(1), Ecology may require PLPs to
investigate or conduct other remedial actions with respect to any release or threatened release of
hazardous substances, whenever it believes such action to be in the public interest. Based on the
foregoing facts, Ecology believes that conducting the remedial investigation/feasibility study,
interim action and development of a draft cleanup action plan (CAP) required by this Order is in
the public interest.
E. Under WAC 173-340-430, an interim action IS a remedial action that is
technically necessary to reduce a threat to human health or the environment by eliminating or
substantially reducing one or more pathways for exposure to a hazardous substance, that corrects
a problem that may become substantially worse or cost substantially more to address if the
remedial action is delayed, or that is needed to provide for completion of a site hazard
assessment, remedial investigation/feasibility study or design of a cleanup action. The presence
at the Site of significant concentrations of gasoline, diesel and oil in soil and groundwater
immediately adjacent to Port of Washington Narrows presents circumstances which warrant an
interim action consistent with WAC 173-340-430. The interim action will consist of removal of
petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) source(s). This includes the excavation of TPH contaminated
soils and/or removal of any product presents at the site, chemical oxidation, and enhanced
bioremediation. More details regarding the interim action are discussed in the RI/FS work plan
(Exhibit B, Section 3)
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 8 of 21
VII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED
Based on the Findings of Fact and Ecology Determinations, it is hereby ordered that the
City conduct the folloVv1ng remedial actions at the Site and that these actions be conducted in
accordance with Chapter 173-340 WAC unless otherwise specifically provided for herein:
A. The City shall conduct the remedial actions fully described in Exhibit B to this
Agreed Order. Generally, the City shall develop a draft cleanup action plan (DCAP) for the Site
and, prior to developing the DCAP, conduct a remedial investigation/feasibility study and
interim action including, but not limited to, the following tasks:
. Installing two new groundwater monitoring wells;
. Collecting groundwater and soil samples to define the full nature and extent of
contamination;
. Performing a chemical oxidation pilot scale study;
. Performing an interim action to remove contaminated soils and/or any product
identified by the remedial investigation, chemical oxidation for the treatment/reduction
of the other source areas, and enhanced bioremediation;
. Evaluating remedial alternatives;
. Identifying the preferred remedial alternative for the site;
B. Upon the approval of the final Rl/FS report, the City shall prepare a draft CAP in
accordance with WAC 173-340-380 that provides a proposed remedial action to address the
contamination at the site. In addition to a general description of the proposed remedial action,
the DCAP shall describe the results of contaminated soils excavation, the chemical oxidation
pilot scale study, the application of enhanced bioremediation technologies, and studies of natural
attenuation of residual groundwater contamination. The DCAP shall also include: cleanup levels
from the RlIFS together with the rationale for their selection; a schedule for implementation;
description of any institutional controls proposed; and summary of applicable local, state and
[ederallaws pertinent to the proposed cleanup action.
C. The City shall perform actions required by this Order according to the schedule
included in Exhibit B.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 90f21
D. If, at any time after the first exchange of comments on drafts, Ecology determines
that insufficient progress is being made in the preparation of any of the deliverables required by
Exhibit B, Ecology may complete and issue the final deliverable.
E. Should significant additional work be necessary based on information obtained
during the remedial investigation and/or new information that was not known at the time of the
preparation of this Agreed Order, a supplemental work plan shall be submitted to Ecology for
review and approval according to an agreed schedule, including an agreed revised schedule for
submission of the resulting RIfFS report.
VIII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ORDER
A. Public Notice
RCW 70.105D.030(2)(a) requires that, at a minimum, this Order be subject to concurrent
public notice. Ecology shall be responsible for providing such public notice and reserves the
right to modify or withdraw any provisions of this Order should public comment disclose facts or
considerations which indicate to Ecology that this Order is inadequate or improper in any
respect.
B. Remedial Action Costs
The City shall pay to Ecology costs incurred by Ecology pursuant to this Order and
consistent with WAC 173-340-550(2). These costs shall include work performed by Ecology or
its contractors for, or on, the Site under Chapter 70.105D RCW, including remedial actions and
Order preparation, negotiation, oversight, and administration. These costs shall include work
performed both prior (retroactive to October 1, 2006) to and subsequent to the issuance of this
Order. Ecology's costs shall include costs of direct activities and support costs of direct
activities as defined in WAC 173-340-550(2). The City shall pay the required amount within
ninety (90) days of receiving from Ecology an itemized statement of costs that includes a
summary of costs incurred, an identification of involved staff, and the amount of time spent by
involved staff members on the project. A general statement of work performed will be provided
upon request. Itemized statements shall be prepared quarterly. Pursuant to WAC 173-340-
550(4), failure to pay Ecology's costs within ninety (90) days of receipt ofthe itemized statement
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 10 of21
of costs will result in interest charges at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum,
compounded monthly.
Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.055, Ecology has authority to recover unreimbursed remedial
action costs (direct activities and support costs) by filing a lien against real property subject to
the remedial actions.
C. Implementation of Remedial Action
If Ecology determines that the City has failed without good cause to implement the
remedial action, in whole or in part, Ecology may, after notice to the City, perform any or all
portions of the remedial action that remain incomplete. If Ecology performs all or portions of
the remedial action because of the City's failure to comply with its obligations under this Order,
the City shall reimburse Ecology for the costs of doing such work in accordance with Section
VIII.B (Remedial Action Costs), provided that the City is not obligated under this Section to
reimburse Ecology for costs incurred for work inconsistent with or beyond the scope of this
Order.
Except where necessary to abate an emergency situation, the City shall not perform any
remedial actions at the Site outside those remedial actions required by this Order, unless Ecology
concurs, in writing, with such additional remedial actions.
D. Designated Project Coordinators
The project coordinator for Ecology is:
Panjini Balaraju
Toxics Cleanup Program
PO Box 47600, Olympia, W A 98504-7600
(360) 407-6161
E-mail: pbaI461@ecy.wa.gov
The project coordinator for the City is:
Thomas Knuckey
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, Washington 98310
(360) 473-2376
E-Mail: thomas.knuckey@ci.bremerton.wa.us
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 11 of21
Each project coordinator shall be responsible for overseeing the implementation of this
Order. Ecology's project coordinator will be Ecology's designated representative for the Site.
To the maximum extent possible, communications between Ecology and the City, and all
documents, including reports, approvals, and other correspondence concerning the activities
performed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Order shall be directed through the project
coordinators. The project coordinators may designate, in writing, working level staff contacts for
all or portions ofthe implementation of the work to be performed required by this Order.
Any party may change its respective project coordinator. Written notification shall be
given to the other party at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the change.
E. Performance
All geologic and hydrogeologic work performed pursuant to this Order shall be under the
supervision and direction of a geologist licensed in the State of Washington or under the direct
supervision of an engineer registered in the State of Washington, except as otherwise provided
for by Chapters 18.220 and 18.43 RCW.
All engin~ering work performed pursuant to this Order shall be under the direct
supervision of a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington, except as otherwise
provided for by RCW 18.43.130.
All construction work performed pursuant to this Order shall be under the direct
supervision of a professional engineer or a qualified technician under the direct supervision of a
professional engineer. The professional engineer must be registered in the State of Washington,
except as otherwise provided for by RCW 18.43.130.
Any documents submitted containing geologic, hydrologic or engineering work shall be
under the seal of an appropriately licensed professional as required by Chapter 18.220 RCW or
RCW 18.43.130.
The City shall notify Ecology in writing of the identity of any engineer(s) and
geologist(s), contractor(s) and subcontractor(s), and others to be used in carrying out the terms of
this Order, in advance of their involvement at the Site.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 12 of21
F. Access
Ecology or any Ecology authorized representative shall have the full authority to enter
and freely move about all property at the Site that the City either owns, controls, or has access
rights to at all reasonable times for the purposes of, inter alia: inspecting records, operation logs,
and contracts related to the work being performed pursuant to this Order; reviewing the City's
progress in carrying out the terms of this Order; conducting such tests or collecting such samples
as Ecology may deem necessary; using a camera, sound recording, or other documentary type
equipment to record work done pursuant to this Order; and verifying the data submitted to
Ecology by the City. The City shall make all reasonable efforts to secure access rights for those
properties within the Site not owned or controlled by the City where remedial activities or
investigations will be performed pursuant to this Order. Ecology or any Ecology authorized
representative shall give reasonable notice before entering any Site property owned or controlled
by the City unless an emergency prevents such notice. All persons who access the Site pursuant
to this Section shall comply with any applicable Health and Safety Planes). Ecology employees
and their representatives shall not be required to sign any liability release or waiver as a
condition of Site property access.
G. Sampling, Data Submittal, and Availability
With respect to the implementation of this Order, the City shall make the results of all
sampling, laboratory reports, and/or test results generated by it or on its behalf available to
Ecology. Pursuant to WAC 173-340-840(5), all sampling data shall be submitted to Ecology in
both printed and electronic formats in accordance with Section VII (Work to be Performed),
Ecology's Toxics Cleanup Program Policy 840 (Data Submittal Requirements), and/or any
subsequent procedures specified by Ecology for data submittal. Attached as Exhibit D is
Ecology Policy 840, Data Submittal Requirements.
If requested by Ecology, the City shall allow Ecology and/or its authorized representative
to take split or duplicate samples of any samples collected by the City pursuant to
implementation of this Order. The City shall notify Ecology seven (7) days in advance of any
sample collection or work activity at the Site. Ecology shall, upon request, allow the City and/or
,
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 13 of21
its authorized representative to take split or duplicate samples of any samples collected by
Ecology pursuant to the implementation of this Order, provided that doing so does not interfere
with Ecology's sampling. \Vithout limitation on Ecology's rights under Section VIII.F (Access),
Ecology shall notify the City prior to any sample collection activity unless an emergency
prevents such notice.
In accordance with WAC 173-340-830(2)(a), all hazardous substance analyses shall be
conducted by a laboratory accredited under Chapter 173-50 WAC for the specific analyses to be
conducted, unless otherwise approved by Ecology.
H. Public Participation
A Public Participation Plan is required for this Site. Ecology shall review any existing
Public Participation Plan to determine its continued appropriateness and whether it requires
amendment, or if no plan exists, Ecology shall develop a Public Participation Plan alone or in
conjunction with the City.
Ecology shall maintain the responsibility for public participation at the Site. However,
the City shall cooperate with Ecology, and shall:
1. If agreed to by Ecology, develop appropriate mailing list, prepare drafts of public
notices and fact sheets at important stages of the remedial action, such as the submission of work
plans, remedial investigation/feasibility study reports, cleanup action plans, and engineering
design reports. As appropriate, Ecology will edit, finalize, and distribute such fact sheets and
prepare and distribute public notices of Ecology's presentations and meetings.
2. Notify Ecology's project coordinator prior to the preparation of all press releases
and fact sheets, and before major meetings with the interested public and local governments.
Likewise, Ecology shall notify the City prior to the issuance of all press releases and fact sheets,
and before major meetings with the interested public and local governments. For all press
releases, fact sheets, meetings, and other outreach efforts by the City that do not receive prior
Ecology approval, the City shall clearly indicate to its audience that the press release, fact sheet,
meeting, or other outreach effort was not sponsored or endorsed by Ecology.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-S024
Page 14 of21
3. When requested by Ecology, participate in public presentations on the progress of
the remedial action at the Site. Participation may be through attendance at public meetings to
assist in answering questions or as a presenter.
4. ~nen requested by Ecology, arrange and/or continue information repositories to
be located at the following locations:
a. Bremerton Public Library
612 Sth Street North
Bremerton, Washington 98337
b. Washington Department of Ecology
Headquarters Office
300 Desmond Drive
Lacey, W A 98503
At a minimum, copies of all public notices, fact sheets, and press releases; all quality assured
monitoring data; remedial action plans and reports, supplemental remedial planning documents,
and all other similar documents relating to performance of the remedial action required by this
Order shall be promptly placed in these repositories.
I. Retention of Records
During the pendency of this Order, and for ten (10) years from the date of completion of
work performed pursuant to this Order, the City shall preserve all records, reports, documents,
and underlying data in its possession relevant to the implementation of this Order and shall insert
a similar record retention requirement into all contracts with project contractors and
subcontractors. Upon request of Ecology, the City shall make all records available to Ecology
and allow access for review within a reasonable time.
J. Resolution of Disputes
1. In the event a dispute arises as to an approval, disapproval, proposed change, or
other decision or action by Ecology's project coordinator, or an itemized billing statement under
Section VIII.B (Remedial Action Costs), the Parties shall utilize the dispute resolution procedure
set forth below.
a. Upon receipt of Ecology's project coordinator's written decision or the
itemized billing statement, the City has fourteen (14) days within which to notify
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 15 of21
Ecology's project coordinator in writing of its objection to the decision or itemized
statement.
b. The Parties' project coordinators shall then confer in an effort to resolve
the dispute. If the project coordinators cannot resolve the dispute within fourteen (14)
days, Ecology's project coordinator shall issue a written decision.
c. The City may then request regional management review of the decision.
This request shall be submitted in writing to the Toxics Cleanup Land & Aquatic Lands
Cleanup Section Manager within seven (7) days of receipt of Ecology's project
coordinator's written decision.
d. The Section Manager shall conduct a review of the dispute and shall
endeavor to issue a written decision regarding the dispute within thirty (30) days of the
City's request for review. The Section Manager's decision shall be Ecology's final
decision on the disputed matter.
2. The Parties agree to only utilize the dispute resolution process in good faith and
agree to expedite, to the extent possible, the dispute resolution process whenever it is used.
3. Implementation of these dispute resolution procedures shall not provide a basis
for delay of any activities required in this Order, unless Ecology agrees in writing to a schedule
extension.
K. Extension of Schedule
1. An extension of schedule shall be granted only when a request for an extension is
submitted in a timely fashion, generally at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the
deadline for which the extension is requested, and good cause exists for granting the extension.
All extensions shall be requested in writing. The request shall specify:
a. The deadline that is sought to be extended;
b. The length of the extension sought;
c. The reason(s) for the extension; and
d. Any related deadline or schedule that would be affected if the extension
were granted.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 16 of21
2. The burden shall be on the City to demonstrate to the satisfaction of Ecology that
the request for such extension has been submitted in a timely fashion and that good cause exists
for granting the extension. Good cause may include, but may not be limited to:
a. Circumstances beyond the reasonable control and despite the due
diligence of the City including delays caused by unrelated third parties or Ecology, such
as (but not limited to) delays by Ecology in reviewing, approving, or modifying
documents submitted by the City;
b. Acts of God, including fire, flood, blizzard, extreme temperatures, storm,
or other unavoidable casualty; or
c. Endangerment as described in Section VIILM (Endangerment).
However, neither increased costs of performance of the terms of this Order nor changed
economic circumstances shall be considered circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the
Port.
3. Ecology shall act upon any written request for extension in a timely fashion.
Ecology shall give the City written notification of any extensions granted pursuant to this Order.
A requested extension shall not be effective until approved by Ecology. Unless the extension is
a substantial change, it shall not be necessary to amend this Order pursuant to Section VIII.L
(Amendment of Order) when a schedule extension is granted.
4. An extension shall only be granted for such period of time as Ecology determines
is reasonable under the circumstances. Ecology may grant schedule extensions exceeding ninety
(90) days only as a result of:
a. Delays in the issuance of a necessary permit which was applied for in a
timely manner;
b. Other circumstances deemed exceptional or extraordinary by Ecology; or
c. Endangerment as described in Section VIII.M (Endangerment).
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 17 of21
L. Amendment of Order
The project coordinators may verbally agree to mmor changes to the work to be
performed without formally amending this Order. Minor changes will be documented in \"-vriting
by Ecology within seven (7) days of verbal agreement.
Except as provided in Section VIII.N (Reservation of Rights), substantial changes to the
work to be performed shall require formal amendment of this Order. This Order may only be
formally amended by the written consent of both Ecology and the City. The City shall submit a
VvTitten request for amendment to Ecology for approval. Ecology shall indicate its approval or
disapproval in writing and in a timely manner after the written request for amendment is
received. If the amendment to this Order represents a substantial change, Ecology will provide
public notice and opportunity to comment. Reasons for the disapproval of a proposed
amendment to this Order shall be stated in writing. If Ecology does not agree to a proposed
amendment, the disagreement may be addressed through the dispute resolution procedures
described in Section VIILJ (Resolution of Disputes).
L. Endangerment
In the event Ecology determines that any activity being performed at the Site is creating
or has the potential to create a danger to human health or the environment on or surrounding the
Site, Ecology may direct the City to cease such activities for such period of time as it deems
necessary to abate the danger. The City shall immediately comply with such direction.
In the event the City determines that any activity being performed at the Site is creating
or has the potential to create a danger to human health or the environment, the City may cease
such activities. The City shall notify Ecology's project coordinator as soon as possible, but no
later than twenty-four (24) hours after making such determination or ceasing such activities.
" Upon Ecology's direction the City shall provide Ecology with documentation of the basis for the
determination or cessation of such activities. If Ecology disagrees with the City's cessation of
activities, it may direct the City to resume such activities.
If Ecology concurs with or orders a work stoppage pursuant to Section VIII.M
(Endangerment), the City's obligations with respect to the ceased activities shall be suspended
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 18 of21
until Ecology determines the danger is abated, and the time for perfonnance of such activities, as
well as the time for any other work dependent upon such activities, shall be extended in
accordance with Section VIII.K (Extension of Schedule) for such period of time as Ecology
determines is reasonable under the circumstances.
Nothing in this Order shall limit the authority of Ecology, its employees, agents, or
contractors to take or require appropriate action in the event of an emergency.
M. Reservation of Rights
This Order is not a settlement under Chapter 70.105D RCW. Ecology's signature on this
Order in no way constitutes a covenant not to sue or a compromise of any of Ecology's rights or
authority. Ecology will not, however, bring an action against the City to recover remedial action
costs paid to and received by Ecology under this Order. In addition, Ecology will not take
additional enforcement actions against the City regarding remedial actions required by this
Order, provided the City complies with this Order.
Ecology nevertheless reserves its rights under Chapter 70.1 05D RCW, including the right
to require additional or different remedial actions at the Site should it deem such. actions
necessary to protect human health and the environment, and to issue orders requiring such
remedial actions. Ecology also reserves all rights regarding the injury to, destruction of, or loss
of natural resources resulting from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at
the Site.
N. Transfer of Interest in Property
No voluntary conveyance or relinquishment oftide, easement, leasehold, or other interest
in any portion of the Site shall be consummated by the City without provision for continued
implementation of all requirements of this Order and implementation of any remedial actions
found to be necessary as a result of this Order.
Prior to the City's transfer of any interest in all or any portion of the Site, and during the
effective period of this Order, the City shall provide a copy of this Order to any prospective
purchaser, lessee, transferee, assignee, or other successor in said interest; and, at least thirty (30)
days prior to any transfer, the City shall notify Ecology of said transfer. Upon transfer of any
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 19 of21
interest, the City shall restrict uses and activities to those consistent with this Order and notify all
transferees of the restrictions on the use of the property.
o. Compliance with Applicable Laws
1. All actions carried out by the City pursuant to this Order shall be done in
accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements, including requirements to
obtain necessary permits, except as provided in RCW 70.105D.090. The permits or specific
federal, state or local requirements that the agency has determined are applicable and that are
knoVvTI at the time of entry of this Order have been identified in Exhibit C.
2. Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.090(1), the City is exempt from the procedural
requirements of Chapters 70.94, 70.95, 70.105, 77.55, 90.48, and 90.58 RCW and of any laws
requiring or authorizing local government permits or approvals. However, the City shall comply
with the substantive requirements of such permits or approvals. The exempt permits or
approvals and the applicable substantive requirements of those permits or approvals, as they are
known at the time of entry of this Order, have been identified in Exhibit C.
The City has a continuing obligation to determine whether additional permits or
approvals addressed in RCW 70.105D.090(1) would otherwise be required for the remedial
action under this Order. In the event either Ecology or the City determines that additional
permits or approvals addressed in RCW 70.105D.090(1) would otherwise be required for the
remedial action under this Order, it shall promptly notify the other party of its determination.
Ecology shall determine whether Ecology or the City shall be responsible to contact the
appropriate state and/or local agencies. If Ecology so requires, the City shall promptly consult
with the appropriate state and/or local agencies and provide Ecology with written documentation
from those agencies of the substantive requirements those agencies believe are applicable to the
remedial action. Ecology shall make the final determination on the additional substantive
requirements that must be met by the City and on how the City must meet those requirements.
Ecology shall inform the City in writing of these requirements. Once established by Ecology,
the additional requirements shall be enforceable requirements of this Order. The City shall not
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 20 of21
begin or continue the remedial action potentially subject to the additional requirements until
Ecology makes its final determination.
3. Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.090(2), m the event Ecology determines that the
exemption from complying with the procedural requirements of the laws referenced in
RCW 70.105D.090(1) would result in the loss of approval from a federal agency that is
necessary for the State to administer any federal law, the exemption shall not apply and the City
shall comply with both the procedural and substantive requirements of the laws referenced in
RCW 70.1 05D.090(1), including any requirements to obtain permits.
P. Indemnification
The City agrees to indemnify and save and hold the State of Washington, its employees,
and agents harmless from any and all claims or causes of action for death or injuries to persons
or for loss or damage to property to the extent arising from or on account of acts or omissions of
the City, its officers, employees, agents, or contractors in entering into and implementing this
Order. However, the City shall not indemnify the State of Washington nor save nor hold its
employees and agents harmless from any claims or causes of action to the extent arising out of
the negligent acts or omissions of the State of Washington, or the employees or agents of the
State, in entering into or implementing this Order.
IX. SATISFACTION OF ORDER
The provisions of this Order shall be deemed satisfied upon the City's receipt of written
notification from Ecology that the City has completed the remedial activity required by this
Order, as amended by any modifications, and that the City has complied with all other provisions
ofthis Agreed Order.
X. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to RCW 70.1 05D.050, this Order may be enforced as follows:
A. The Attorney General may bring an action to enforce this Order in a state or
federal court.
B. The Attorney General may seek, by filing an action, if necessary, to recover
amounts spent by Ecology for investigative and remedial actions and orders related to the Site.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 21 of21
C. In the event the City refuses, without sufficient cause, to comply with any term of
this Order, the City will be liable for:
a. Up to three (3) times the amount of any costs incurred by the State of
\Vashington as a result of its refusal to comply; and
b. Civil penalties of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per day for
each day it refuses to comply.
D. This Order is not appealable to the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board.
This Order may be reviewed only as provided under RCW 70.105D.060.
Effective date of this Order:
CITY OF BREMERTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Phil Williams
Public Works and Utility Director
The City of Bremerton
Bremerton, Washington
Telephone: (360) 473-2376
Tim 1. Nord
Section Manager
Taxies Cleanup Program
Land & Aquatic Lands Cleanup Section
Telephone: (360) 407-7226
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
PO Box 47600 . Olympia, WA 98504-7600 · 360-407-6000
TTY 711 or 800-833-6388 (for the speech or hearing impaired)
CERTIFIED MAIL
August 29, 2007
Mr. Phil Williams, Director
Public Works and Utility
City of Bremerton
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, Washington 98130-4620
~~i~:(:: ~\lE '~~~~
AUG :3 0 2007
,(",...'~ r.' ~"l. .&.
......!lV Of brerm.1i'lt'XJ
r-:lty A' ~rtn!'r'!~IY't' ("'ff:;c';:~l
~l~ 4~~"_,~t"", v .)f I v
Re: Chevron Tank Farm Port Washington Narrows (Former Chevron Property)
Agreed Order Number DE-07TCPHQ-5024.
Dear Mr. Williams:
Enclosed is the final Agreed Order Number DE-07TCPHQ-5024 for conducting a
.. u.. --.- - remedialinvestigationlfeasibility studyand'interimactionat Chevron Tank: Farm Port--.u.----'......
Washington Narrows (Former Chevron Property) Site located at 1310 Highland Avenue
in Bremerton, Washington 98310.
Please sign the enclosed Agreed Order and mail it back to me by September 14,2007 to
the fOllowing address:
Panjini Balaraju
Department of Ecology
Toxics Cleanup Program
Lands and Aquatic Lands Section
300 Desmond Drive SE
PO Box 47600
Lacey, Washington 98504-7600
We will coordinate with the City of Bremerton (City) regarding the public comment period
date on the Agreed Order. We appreciate the City's cooperation and look forward to
working with the City for an expedited, effective and efficient cleanup.
o
Mr. Phil Williams
Page 2 of 2
August 29, 2007
If you have any questions, please call me at (360) 407-6161 or Barry Rogowski at (360)
407 -7236.
anjini Balaraju
reject Manager
Land and Aquatic Lands Cleanup Section
T oxics Cleanup Program
Enclosure:
Cc: Roger Lubovich, City of Bremerton Attorney
Tom Knuckey, City of Bremerton
Barry Rogowski, Ecology
Lee Overton, Office of the Attorney General
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
In the Matter of Remedial Action by:
AGREED ORDER for REMEDIAL
INVESTIGA nON/FEASIBILITY STUDY
and INTERIM ACTION - Chevron Tank Farm
Port Washington Narrows
CHEVRON TANK FARM PORT
WASHINGTON NARROWS
No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
TO: The City of Bremerton
Public Works Department
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, Washington 98310
~~'f~;('~ i:~; ~\l~: r~~
.' ~ ,/u:r "'<_~'"< ol . ..-\l~ iif ~ }$
. - -. -~ '._"'1" -;1) !h", &ffi'o/
AUG 3 0 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Br6mertt:)n
City Attorney's Office
I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................3
II. JURISDICTION................................................................................................................. ...3
III. PARTIES BOUND...................................... ................................................ .................. ........3
-IV.~~---.D EFINITIONSu;~-;:~;-; ~;;:..;~;; ;~';;;;;-'-;~;;;;:.;~ :-;.:-~; ~;~-:: ;-;;:: .:::;;::-::::'-: ::.:'-::::: .~:.::: ::-:-:-:::-::::-:-.-.-:::. :::-:-::-::: ::--'--:.-.::3- ---
V. FINDINGS OF FACT... ............................. ........... ................................................................4
VI. ECOLOGY DETERMINATIONS.................................................................... ....................6
VII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED. ............... ................................................................... .......... 8
VIII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ORDER ..........................................................................8
A. Public Notice............................... .................. ................................................................. 8
.B. Remedial Action Costs.................................................................................................. 9
C. Implementation of Remedial Action................. ...... ..... ........... ............ ....... ....................9
D. Designated Project Coordinators .................................................................................10
E. Performance .................................................................................................................1 0
F. Access............................................................ ............................................................. .11
G. Sampling, Data Submittal, and Availability ................................................................12
H. Public Participation ......................... ............................................ ............. ...... ............. .12
I. Retention of Records........... ........ ............................. ................ .................. .............. ....14
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 2 of21
J. Resolution of Disputes................................................................................................ .14
K. Extension of Schedule................................................................................................. .15
L. Amendment of Order................................................................... ..... ....................... ....16
M. Endangerment..............................................................................................................I 7
N. Reservation of Rights............................................... ....................................................17
O. Transfer of Interest in Property ............................ ...... ................................................ ..18
P. Compliance with Applicable Laws.................................................... .................. ........19
Q. Indemnification .................. ....... ..................... ............. ........ ............ ...... ...................... .20
IX. SATISFACTION OF ORDER ........... .................................................................................20
X. ENFORCEMENT ...............................................................................................................20
EXHIBIT - A
EXHIBIT - B
EXHIBIT -C
--- EXHIBIT--D
Site Diagram
Scope of W ork, Work Plan & Schedule
Applicable, Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
-PoliGy840 (Data-Submittal-Requirements) ----- .-
ATTACHMENT-1 June 2005, Due Diligence Investigation
ATTACHMENT-2 Groundwater Monitoring Results (1988 through 2003)
A TT ACHMENT -3 March 1994, Supplemental Soil Investigation Results
ATTACHMENT-4 November 1991, Soil Vapor Extraction System Results
ATTACHMENT-5 July 1991, Site Hazard Assessment Results
ATTACHMENT-6 March 1989, Soil investigation Results including some Product
Recovery
ATTACHMENT-7 November 1988, Soil and Groundwater Investigation Results
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 3 of21
I. INTRODUCTION
The mutual objective of the State of Washington, Department of Ecology (Ecology) and
the City of Bremerton (the City) under this Agreed Order (Order) is to provide for remedial
action at a facility where there has been a release or threatened release of hazardous substances.
This Order requires the City to conduct a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RIfFS) to
collect, develop and evaluate sufficient information to develop a final cleanup action plan (CAP)
for the Site, and to prepare a draft CAP. In addition, the City is required by this Order to conduct
an appropriate interim action to address the contaminated soils. Ecology believes the actions
required by this Order are in the public interest.
II. JURISDICTION
This Agreed Order IS issued pursuant to the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA),
RCW 70.105D.050(1).
III. PARTIES BOUND
This _Agreed Qrder s~all (lPph7~() __aI!~_~~J~tIl_q!Ilg_l1P~:r[l__t~~_ :P~~~!2Jb-i~ _Q~(i~I L!ht::ir __.
. -~.. - -- ------ - --------- ~-------- - --- -----
successors and assigns. The undersigned representative of each party hereby certifies that he or
she is fully authorized to enter into this Order and to execute and legally bind such party to
comply with this Order. The City agrees to undertake all actions required by the terms and
conditions of this Order. The City shall provide a copy of this Order to all agents, contractors,
and subcontractors retained to perform work required by this Order, and shall ensure that all
work undertaken by such agents, contractors, and subcontractors complies with this Order.
IV. DEFINITIONS
Unless otherwise specified herein, the definitions set forth in Chapter 70.1 05D RCW and
- Chapter 173-340 WAC shall control the meanings of the terms in this Order.
A. Site: The Site is referred to as Chevron Tank Farm Port Washington Narrows and
is generally located at 1310 Highland Avenue in Bremerton, Washington 98310. The Site is
defined by the extent of contamination caused by the release of hazardous substances at the Site.
Based upon factors currently known to Ecology, the Site is more particularly described in
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 4 of21
Exhibit A to this Order, which includes a detailed Site diagram and the location map. The Site
constitutes a Facility under RCW 70.105D.020(4).
B. Parties: Refers to the State of Washington, Department of Ecology and the City
of Bremerton.
C. Potentially Liable Person (PLP): Refers to the City,of Bremerton.
D. Agreed Order or Order: Refers to this Order and each of the exhibits to this
Order. All exhibits are integral and enforceable parts of this Order. The terms "Agreed Order"
or "Order" shall include all exhibits to this Order.
v. FINDINGS OF FACT
Ecology makes the following findings of fact, without any express or implied admissions
of such facts by the City:
A. The Chevron Tank Farm Port Washington Narrows site (the "Site") is located at
1310 Highland Avenue, Bremerton, Washington (the "Property") and consists of approximately
1.5-acres. The Property is bounded on the northeast by the Port Washington Narrows, on the
northwest by a small inlet (Smith Cove), on the southeast by a residential area and on the
southwest by a mixed residential and business area. (Exhibit-A). From approximately 1950 until
1988, Chevron operated a bulk storage and distribution center for petroleum products on the
property, including a fuel distribution dock.
B. Currently the City of Bremerton owns the Property and it is a vacant piece of
land. (Exhibit-A).
C. In June 2005, Parametrix conducted a Due Diligence Investigation for the City of
. Bremerton to evaluate the then-current conditions at the Site.. The evaluation included a
comprehensive summary of site investigation, previous remediation efforts, data gaps, additional
investigations, a number of potential remedial alternatives and recommendations for the
property's acquisition. (Attachment-I).
D. Eighteen groundwater monitoring wells were placed on the site; sixteen remain.
From October 1988 to October 2003, a total of thirty-one rounds of quarterly, semiannual and/or
annual groundwater sampling have been conducted at the site. All of these groundwater samples
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 5 of21
were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons-gasoline (TPH-G), TPH-diesel (TPH-D), TPH-
Oil (TPH-O), benzene, ethylebenzene, toluene, xylenes (BETX) and dissolved lead. Results of
the latest round of groundwater sampling (October 2003) showed elevated concentrations of
TPH-G (9,000 ug/l), TPH-D (32,000 ug/l), TPH-O (5,200 ug/l) and benzene (700 ug/l). These
concentrations exceed MTCA Method-A cleanup levels of 800 ug/l (TPH-G), 500 ug/l (TPH-D
and TPH-O) and 5 ug/l (benzene). (Attachrnent-2).
E. In March 1994, Chevron Company conducted a Supplemental Site Assessment.
As a part of this investigation, nine soil borings were drilled and six borings were converted into
groundwater monitoring wells. A total of thirteen soil samples were selected and sent to an off-
site laboratory for TPH-G, TPH-D, TPH-O, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) and total
lead analysis. Some of the soil samples showed elevated concentrations of TPH-G (1,300
mg/kg), TPH-D (11,000 mg/kg) and PAH range of 1.2 mg/kg to 24 mg/kg. These concentrations
exceed MTCA Method-A cleanup levels of 100 mg/kg, 2,000 mg/kg and 0.1 mg/kg (prorated to
b~nz~~tl)pyr~~~_'Y~ __t~~!_cjtx~gl!iv~}~~tJa.c!()r~L (At!a.~~~ll!:J 2 :__.___. mm__ ____._. ... ____ ___ ._.u_ ... .
.- --- ---- ---- -----
F. In November of 1991, Hart Crowser (Chevron's consultant) installed a soil vapor
extraction (SVE) system to remove the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the soils. The
system included eleven dedicated extraction wells and five groundwater monitoring wells. The
SVE system was operated from November 1991 through December 1994. Because of the low
\
VOC recovery the system was turned off in December 1994. During this period a total of
approximately 195,000 pounds of VOCs were extracted and the thickness of product was
reduced in some of the groundwater monitoring wells. (Attachrnent-4).
G. In July 1991, Ecology conducted a site hazard assessment investigation. As a part
of this investigation groundwater, sediment and shellfish samples were collected. These samples
were analyzed for TPH-G, TPH-D, BTEX, semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and total
lead. Groundwater results showed: total TPH (5,660 ug/l), benzene (2,420 ug/l), toluene (4,390
ug/l) and nitrobenzene (152 ug/l). Results of sediment samples (all compounds) were below
their practical quantitation limits (PQL). Since PQLs were higher than the Sediment
Management Standards, it does not preclude the presence of these compounds in the sediments
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 60f21
exceeding the marine Sediment Management Standards. In addition, total TPH (100 mg/kg -
412 mg/kg), xylene (78 ug/kg - 103 ug/kg) and lead (11.3 mg/kg - 53.3 mg/kg) were also
detected in sediment samples. (Attachment-5).
H. In May 1989, Chevron conducted soil investigation and Phase-I remediation
(some product removal). Nine test pits were excavated and a total of eighteen (18) soil samples
were collected for TPH-G, TPH-D and total hydrocarbon identification (HCID) analysis.
Elevated levels of TPH-G (25,000 mg/kg) and TPH-D (5,800 mg/kg) were detected in soil
samples. In addition, measurement of free phase hydrocarbon thickness revealed the presence of
approximately 3 to 4 feet of free product at certain locations on the site. A total of 47 gallons of
free product was removed during a period of one year. (Attachment-6).
1. In November 1988, Chevron conducted a soil and groundwater investigation. As
a part of this investigation,. twelve (12) exploratory borings and seven (7) test pits were installed
and a total of seventeen (17) soil samples were collected for TPH-G, TPH-D and BTEX analysis.
Elevated levels of TPH-G (4,300 mg/kg), TPH-D (17,000 mg/kg), benzene (3.4 mg/kg), toluene
(15 mg/kg), ethylbenzene (3.1 mg/kg) and xylenes (12.4 mg/kg) were detected exceeding their
MTCA Method-A cleanup levels of respectively, 30 mg/kg, 2,000 mg.kg, 0.03 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg,
6 mg/kg and 9 mg/kg. (Attachment-7).
Nine of the above-mentioned twelve borings were converted into groundwater
monitoring wells and groundwater samples were collected for total petroleum hydrocarbon
(TPH) and BTEX analysis. TPH, BTEX concentrations of 1,742 ug/l, 6100 ug/l, 19,000 ug/l,
2900 ug/l and 23,000 ug/l were detected respectively. These concentrations exceed MTCA
Method-A cleanup levels of 800 ug/l (TPH), 5 ug/l (benzene), 1000 ug/l (toluene and xy1enes)
and 700 ug/l (ethylbenzene) (Attachment-7).
VI. ECOLOGY DETERMINATIONS
A. The City is an "owner or operator" as defined in RCW 70.105D.020(12), of a
"facility" as defined in RCW 70.105D.020(4) because it is the current ovmer of the Site.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 7 of21
B. Based upon all factors known to Ecology, a "release" or "threatened release" of
"hazardous substance(s)" as defined in RCW 70.1 05D.020(20) and RCW 70. 1 05D.020(7),
respectively, has occurred at the Site.
C. Based upon credible evidence, Ecology issued a PLP status letter to the City dated
October 25, 2006, pursuant to RCW 70.1 05D.040, -.020(16) and WAC 173-340-500. By letter
dated October 27, 2006, the City voluntarily waived its rights to notice and comment and
accepted Ecology's determination that the City is a PLP under RCW 70.105D.040. Ecology
notified the City of this determination by letter dated October 31,2006.
D. Pursuant to RCW70.105D.030(1) and -.050(1), Ecology may require PLPs to
investigate or conduct other remedial actions with respect to any release or threatened release of
hazardous substances, whenever it believes such action to be in the public interest. Based on the
foregoing facts, Ecology believes that conducting the remedial investigation/feasibility study,
interim action and development of a draft cleanup action plan (CAP) required by this Order is in
thep_u?~i~ inte~e~t._____ _.
E. Under WAC 173-340-430, an interim action is a remedial action that is
technically necessary to reduce a threat to human health or the environment by eliminating or
substantially reducing one or more pathways for exposure to a hazardous substance, that corrects
a problem that may become substantially worse or cost substantially more to address if the
remedial action is delayed, or that is needed to provide for completion of a site hazard
assessment, remedial investigation/feasibility study or design of a cleanup action. The presence
at the Site of significant concentrations of gasoline, diesel and oil in soil and groundwater
immediately adjacent to Port of Washington Narrows presents circumstances which warrant an
interim action consistent with WAC 173-340-430. The interim action will consist of removal of
petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) source(s). This includes the excavation of TPH contaminated
soils and/or removal of any product presents at the site, chemical oxidation, and enhanced
bioremediation. More details regarding the interim action are discussed in the RVFS work plan
(Exhibit B, Section 3)
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 8 of21
VII. WORK TO BE PERFORMED
Based on the Findings of Fact and Ecology Determinations, it is hereby ordered that the
City conduct the following remedial actions at the Site and that these actions be conducted in
accordance with Chapter 173-340 WAC unless otherwise specifically provided for herein:
A. The City shall conduct the remedial actions fully described in Exhibit B to this
Agreed Order. Generally, the City shall develop a draft cleanup action plan (DCAP) for the Site
and, prior to developing the DCAP, conduct a remedial investigation/feasibility study and
interim action including, but not limited to, the following tasks:
. Installing two new groundwater monitoring wells;
. Collecting groundwater and soil samples to define the full nature and extent of
contamination;
. Performing a chemical oxidation pilot scale study;
. Performing an interim action to remove contaminated soils and/or any product
identified by the remedial investigation, chemical oxidation for the treatment/reduction
of the other source areas, and enhanced bioremediation;
. Evaluating remedial alternatives;
. Identifying the preferred remedial alternative for the site;
B. Upon the approval of the final RIlFS report, the City shall prepare a draft CAP in
accordance with WAC 173-340-380 that provides a proposed remedial action to address the
contamination at the site. In addition to a general description of the proposed remedial action,
the DCAP shall describe the results of contaminated soils excavation, the chemical oxidation
pilot scale study, the application of enhanced bioremediation technologies, and studies of natural
attenuation of residual groundwater contamination. The DCAP shall also include: cleanup levels
from the RlIFS together with the rationale for their selection; a schedule for implementation;
description of any institutional controls proposed; and summary of applicable local, state and
federal laws pertinent to the proposed cleanup action.
C. The City shall perform actions required by this Order according to the schedule
included in Exhibit B.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 9 of21
D. If, at any time after the first exchange of comments on drafts, Ecology determines
that insufficient progress is being made in the preparation of any of the deliverables required by
Exhibit B, Ecology may complete and issue the final deliverable.
E. Should significant additional work be necessary based on infonnation obtained
during the remedial investigation and/or new information that was not known at the time of the
preparation of this Agreed Order, a supplemental work plan shall be submitted to Ecology for
review and approval according to an agreed schedule, including an agreed revised schedule for
submission of the resulting RlfFS report.
VIII. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ORDER
A. Public Notice
RCW 70. 1 05D.030(2)(a) requires that, at a minimum, this Order be subject to concurrent
public notice. Ecology shall be responsible for providing such public notice and reserves the
right to modify or withdraw any provisions of this Order should public comment disclose facts or
~.n~~~.~ ~~~si<i~~~~~~!:lsn ~~~i~l1i!1~ic;at~~!<?~g<::()logy .tl:1a!_thi_~9.~d~r_ i~j!lllcieql.late_ _or jIIlPJ:OP_~L i!LE!lY_u~ Un ..
respect.
B. Remedial Action Costs
The City shall pay to Ecology costs incurred by Ecology pursuant to this Order and
consistent with WAC 173-340-550(2). These costs shall include work performed by Ecology or
its contractors for, or on, the Site under Chapter 70.105D RCW, including remedial actions and
Order preparation, negotiation, oversight, and administration. These costs shall include work
performed both prior (retroactive to October 1, 2006) to and subsequent to the issuance of this
Order. Ecology's costs shall include costs of direct activities and support costs of direct
activities as defined in WAC 173-340-550(2). The City shall pay the required amount within
ninety (90) days of receiving from Ecology an itemized statement of costs that includes a
summary of costs incurred, an identification of involved staff, and the amount of time spent by
involved staff members on the project. A general statement of work performed will be provided
upon request. Itemized statements shall be prepared quarterly. Pursuant to WAC 173-340-
550(4), failure to pay Ecology's costs within ninety (90) days of receipt of the itemized statement
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 10 of21
of costs will result in interest charges at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per alliUm,
compounded monthly.
Pursuant to RCW 70.1 05D.055, Ecology has authority to recover unreimbursed remedial
action costs (direct activities and support costs) by filing a lien against real property subject to
the remedial actions.
c. Implementation of Remedial Action
If Ecology determines that the City has failed without good cause to implement the
remedial action, in whole or in part, Ecology may, after notice to the City, perform any or all
portions of the remedial action that remain incomplete. If Ecology performs all or portions of
the remedial action because of the City's failure to comply with its obligations under this Order,
the City shall reimburse Ecology for the costs of doing such work in accordance with Section
VIILB (Remedial Action Costs), provided that the City is not obligated under this Section to
reimburse Ecology for costs incurred for work inconsistent with or beyond the scope of this
Order.
Except where necessary to abate an emergency situation, the City shall not perform any
remedial actions at the Site outside those remedial actions required by this Order, unless Ecology
concurs, in writing, with such additional remedial actions.
D. Designated Project Coordinators
The project coordinator for Ecology is:
Panjini Balaraju
Toxics Cleanup Program
PO Box 47600, Olympia, W A 98504-7600
(360) 407-6161
E-mail: pbaI461@ecy.wa.gov
The project coordinator for the City is:
Thomas Knuckey
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, Washington 98310
(360) 473-2376
E-Mail: thomas.knuckey@ci.bremerton.wa.us
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 11 of21
Each project coordinator shall be responsible for overseeing the implementation of this
Order. Ecology's project coordinator will be Ecology's designated representative for the Site.
To the maximum extent possible, communications bet\veen Ecology and the City, and all
documents, including reports, approvals, and other correspondence concerning the activities
performed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Order shall be directed through the project
coordinators. The project coordinators may designate, in writing, working level staff contacts for
all or portions ofthe implementation of the work to be performed required by this Order.
Any party may change its respective project coordinator. Written notification shall be
given to the other party at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the change.
E. Performance
All geologic and hydrogeologic work performed pursuant to this Order shall be under the
supervision and direction of a geologist licensed in the State of Washington or under the direct
supervision of an engineer registered in the State of Washington, except as otherwise provided
for by Chapters 18.220 and 18.43 RCW.
All engin~ering work performed pursuant to this Order shall be under the direct
supervision of a professional engineer registered in the State of Washington, except as otherwise
provided for by RCW 18.43.130.
All construction work performed pursuant to this Order shall be under the direct
supervision of a professional engineer or a qualified technician under the direct supervision of a
professional engineer. The professional engineer must be registered in the State of Washington,
except as otherwise provided for by RCW 18.43.130.
Any documents submitted containing geologic, hydrologic or engineering work shall be
under the seal of an appropriately licensed professional as required by Chapter 18.220 RCW or
RCW 18.43.130.
The City shall notify Ecology in writing of the identity of any engineer(s) and
geologist(s), contractor(s) and subcontractor(s), and others to be used in carrying out the terms of
this Order, in advance of their involvement at the Site.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 12 of21
F. Access
Ecology or any Ecology authorized representative shall have the full authority to enter
and freely move about all property at the Site that the City either owns, controls, or has access
rights to at all reasonable times for the purposes of, inter alia: inspecting records, operation logs,
and contracts related to the work being performed pursuant to this Order; reviewing the City's
progress in carrying out the terms of this Order; conducting such tests or collecting such samples
as Ecology may deem necessary; using a camera, sound recording, or other documentary type
equipment to record work done pursuant to this Order; and verifying the data submitted to
Ecology by the City. The City shall make all reasonable efforts to secure access rights for those
properties within the Site not owned or controlled by the City where remedial activities or
investigations will be performed pursuant to this Order. Ecology or any Ecology authorized
representative shall give reasonable notice before entering any Site property owned or controlled
by the City unless an emergency prevents such notice. All persons who access the Site pursuant
to this Section shall comply with any applicable Health and Safety Planes). Ecology employees
and their representatives shall not be required to sign any liability release or waiver as a
condition of Site property access.
G. Sampling, Data Submittal, and Availability
With respect to the implementation of this Order, the City shall make the results of all
sampling, laboratory reports, and/or test results generated by it or on its behalf available to
Ecology. Pursuant to WAC 173-340-840(5), all sampling data shall be submitted to Ecology in
both printed and electronic formats in accordance with Section VII (Work to be Performed),
Ecology's Toxics Cleanup Program Policy 840 (Data Submittal Requirements), and/or any
subsequent procedures specified by Ecology for data submittal. Attached as Exhibit D is
Ecology Policy 840, Data Submittal Requirements.
If requested by Ecology, the City shall allow Ecology and/or its authorized representative
to take split or duplicate samples of any samples collected by the City pursuant to
implementation of this Order. The City shall notify Ecology seven (7) days in advance of any
sample collection or work activity at the Site. Ecology shall, upon request, allow the City and/or
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 13 of21
its authorized representative to take split or duplicate samples of any samples collected by
Ecology pursuant to the implementation of this Order, provided that doing so does not interfere
with Ecology's sampling. Without limitation on Ecology's rights under Section VIII.F (Access),
Ecology shall notify the City prior to any sample collection activity unless an emergency
prevents such notice.
In accordance with WAC 173-340-830(2)(a), all hazardous substance analyses shall be
conducted by a laboratory accredited under Chapter 173-50 WAC for the specific analyses to be
conducted, unless otherwis'e approved by Ecology.
H. Public Participation
A Public Participation Plan is required for this Site. Ecology shall review any existing
Public Participation Plan to determine its continued appropriateness and whether it requires
amendment, or if no plan exists, Ecology shall develop a Public Participation Plan alone or in
conjunction with the City.
. ___~~?~~~X_~~~ll.. ~~~l1!ai12_~~~_~~~poIl_~i~ilio/_!~~J>~~!i~_pctr!i~ip_a~!?~ ~!_!Qe__~.i!~: ..J!g~~y~!,,__.
the City shall cooperate with Ecology, and shall:
1. If agreed to by Ecology, develop appropriate mailing list, prepare drafts of public
notices and fact sheets at important stages of the remedial action, such as the submission of work
plans, remedial investigation/feasibility study reports, cleanup action plans, and engineering
design reports. As appropriate, Ecology will edit, finalize, and distribute such fact sheets and
prepare and distribute public notices of Ecology's presentations,;md meetings.
2. Notify Ecology's project coordinator prior to the preparation of all press releases
and fact sheets, and before major meetings with the interested public and local governments.
Likewise, Ecology shall notify the City prior to the issuance of all press releases and fact sheets,
and before major meetings with the interested public and local governments. For all press
releases, fact sheets, meetings, and other outreach efforts by the City that do not receive prior
Ecology approval, the City shall clearly indicate to its audience that the press release, fact sheet,
meeting, or other outreach effort was not sponsored or endorsed by Ecology.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 14 of21
3. When requested by Ecology, participate in public presentations on the progress of
the remedial action at the Site. Participation may be through attendance at public meetings to
assist in answering questions or as a presenter.
4. When requested by Ecology, arrange and/or continue information repositories to
be located at the following locations:
a. Bremerton Public Library
612 5th Street North
Bremerton, Washington 98337
b. Washington Department of Ecology
Headquarters Office
300 Desmond Drive
Lacey, W A 98503
At a minimum, copies of all public notices, fact sheets, and press releases; all quality assured
monitoring data; remedial action plans and reports, supplemental remedial planning documents,
and all other similar documents relating to performance of the remedial action required by this
Order shall be promptly placed in these repositories.
I. Retention of Records
During the pendency oftrus Order, and for ten (10) years from the date of completion of
work performed pursuant to this Order, the City shall preserve all records, reports, documents,
and underlying data in its possession relevant to the implementation of this Order and shall insert
a similar record retention requirement into all contracts with project contractors and
subcontractors. Upon request of Ecology, the City shall make all records available to Ecology
and allow access for review within a reasonable time.
J. Resolution of Disputes
1. In the event a dispute arises as to an approval, disapproval, proposed change, or
other decision or action by Ecology's project coordinator, or an itemized billing statement under
Section VIII.B (Remedial Action Costs), the Parties shall utilize the dispute resolution procedure
set forth below.
a. Upon receipt of Ecology's project coordinator's written decision or the
itemized billing statement, the City has fourteen (14) days within which to notify
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 15 of21
Ecology's project coordinator in writing of its objection to the decision or itemized
statement.
b. The Parties' project coordinators shall then confer in an effort to resolve
the dispute. If the project coordinators cannot resolve the dispute within fourteen (14)
days, Ecology's project coordinator shall issue a written decision.
c. The City may then request regional management review of the decision.
This request shall be submitted in writing to the Toxics Cleanup Land & Aquatic Lands
Cleanup Section Manager within seven (7) days of receipt of Ecology's project
coordinator's written decision.
d. The Section Manager shall conduct a review of the dispute and shall
endeavor to issue a written decision regarding the dispute within thirty (30) days of the
City's request for review. The Section Manager's decision shall be Ecology's final
decision on the disputed matter.
2. The Parties agree to only utilize the dispute resolution process in good faith and
agree to expedite, to the extent possible, the dispute resolution process whenever it is used.
3. Implementation of these dispute resolution procedures shall not provide a basis
for delay of any activities required in this Order, unless Ecology agrees in writing to a schedule
extension.
K. Extension of Schedule
1. An extension of schedule shall be granted only when a request for an extension is
submitted in a timely fashion, generally at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the
deadline for which the extension is requested, and good cause exists for granting the extension.
All extensions shall be requested in wTiting. The request shall specify:
a. The deadline that is sought to be extended;
b. The length of the extension sought;
c. The reason(s) for the extension; and
d. Any related deadline or schedule that would be affected if the extension
\\Fere granted.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 16 of21
2. The burden shall be on the City to demonstrate to the satisfaction of Ecology that
the request for such extension has been submitted in a timely fashion and that good cause exists
for granting the extension. Good cause may include, but may not be limited to:
a. Circumstances beyond the reasonable control and despite the due
diligence of the City including delays caused by unrelated third parties or Ecology, such
as (but not limited to) delays by Ecology in reviewing, approving, or modifying
documents submitted by the City;
b. Acts of God, including fire, flood, blizzard, extreme temperatures, storm,
or other unavoidable casualty; or
c. Endangerment as described in Section VIILM (Endangerment).
However, neither increased costs of performance of the terms of this Order nor changed
economic circumstances shall be considered circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the
Port.
3. Ecology shall act upon any written request for extension in a timely fashion.
Ecology shall give the City written notification of any extensions granted pursuant to this Order.
A requested extension shall not be effective until approved by Ecology. Unless the extension is
a substantial change, it shall not be necessary to amend this Order pursuant to Section VIILL
(Amendment of Order) when a schedule extension is granted.
4. An extension shall only be granted for such period of time as Ecology determines
is reasonable under the circumstances. Ecology may grant schedule extensions exceeding ninety
(90) days only as a result of:
a. Delays in the issuance of a necessary permit which was applied for in a
timely manner;
b. Other circumstances deemed exceptional or extraordinary by Ecology; or
c. Endangerment as described in Section VIILM (Endangerment).
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 17 of 21
L. Amendment of Order
The project coordinators may verbally agree to mmor changes to the work to be
performed without formally amending this Order. Minor changes will be documented in writing
by Ecology within seven (7) days of verbal agreement.
Except as provided in Section VIII.N (Reservation of Rights), substantial changes to the
work to be performed shall require formal amendment of this Order. This Order may only be
formally amended by the written consent of both Ecology and the City. The City shall submit a
written request for amendment to Ecology for approval. Ecology shall indicate its approval or
disapproval in writing and in a timely manner after the written request for amendment is
received. If the amendment to this Order represents a substantial change, Ecology will provide
public notice and opportunity to comment. Reasons for the disapproval of a proposed
amendment to this Order shall be stated in writing. If Ecology does not agree to a proposed
amendment, the disagreement may be addressed through the dispute resolution procedures
described in Section VIIL] (Resolution of Disputes).
L.Endangerment
In the event Ecology determines that any activity being performed at the Site is creating
or has the potential to create a danger to human health or the environment on or surrounding the
Site, Ecology may direct the City to cease such activities for such period of time as it deems
necessary to abate the danger. The City shall immediately comply with such direction.
In the event the City determines that any activity being performed at the Site is creating
or has the potential to create a danger to human health or the environment, the City may cease
such activities. The City shall notify Ecology's project coordinator as soon as possible, but no
later than twenty-four (24) hours after making such determination or ceasing such activities.
Upon Ecology's direction the City shall provide Ecology with documentation of the basis for the
determination or cessation of such activities. If Ecology disagrees with the City's cessation of
activities, it may direct the City to resume such activities.
If Ecology concurs with or orders a work stoppage pursuant to Section VIILM
(Endangerment), the City's obligations with respect to the ceased activities shall be suspended
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 180f21
until Ecology determines the danger is abated, and the time for performance of such activities, as
well as the time for any other work dependent upon such activities, shall be extended in
accordance with Section VIII.K (Extension of Schedule) for such period of time as Ecology
determines is reasonable under the circumstances.
Nothing in this Order shall limit the authority of Ecology, its employees, agents, or
contractors to take or require appropriate action in the event of an emergency.
M. Reservation of Rights
This Order is not a settlement under Chapter 70.1 05D RCW. Ecology's signature on this
Order in no way constitutes a covenant not to sue or a compromise of any of Ecology's rights or
authority. Ecology will not, however, bring an action against the City to recover remedial action
costs paid to and received by Ecology under this Order. In addition, Ecology will not take
additional enforcement actions against the City regarding remedial actions required by this
Order, provided the City complies with this Order.
Ecology nevertheless reserves its rights under Chapter 70.105D RCW, including the right
to require additional or different remedial actions at the Site should it deem s~ch actions
necessary to protect human health and the environment, and to issue orders requiring such
remedial actions. Ecology also reserves all rights regarding the injury to, destruction of, or loss
of natural resources resulting from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at
the Site.
N. Transfer of Interest in Property
No voluntary conveyance or relinquishment of title, easement, leasehold, or other interest
in any portion of the Site shall be consummated by the City without provision for continued
implementation of all requirements of this Order and implementation of any remedial actions
found to be necessary as a result of this Order.
Prior to the City's transfer of any interest in all or any portion of the Site, and during the
effective period of this Order, the City shall provide a copy of this Order to any prospective
purchaser, lessee, transferee, assignee, or other successor in said interest; and, at least thirty (30)
days prior to any transfer, the City shall notify Ecology of said transfer. Upon transfer of any
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 19 of21
interest, the City shall restrict uses and activities to those consistent with this Order and notify all
transferees of the restrictions on the use of the property.
O. Compliance with Applicable Laws
1. All actions carried out by the City pursuant to this Order shall be done in
accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements, including requirements to
obtain necessary permits, except as provided in RCW 70.105D.090. The permits or specific
federal, state or local requirements that the agency has determined are applicable and that are
kno~n at the time of entry of this Order have been identified in Exhibit C.
2. Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.090(1), the City is exempt from the procedural
requirements of Chapters 70.94, 70.95, 70.105, 77.55, 90.48, and 90.58 RCW and of any laws
requiring or authorizing local government permits or approvals. However, the City shall comply
with the substantive requirements of such permits or approvals. The exempt permits or
approvals and the applicable substantive requirements of those permits or approvals, as they are
known at the time of entry of this Order, have been identified in Exhibit Q.u_______ _..n .___. __..u..__
___.. _ ._, ____ "___" _._On_ ._~.________. . __ _~ __ __w"._____ ____~_ ______ _ __~__ ___ _ __ __ __..____~ ___ _ __ __ _____. ..___ _ _ ______ ". __ _____ _____. ____._ _____ ____ __ "_
The City has a continuing obligation to determine whether additional permits or
approvals addressed in RCW 70.105D.090(1) would otherwise be required for the remedial
action under this Order. In the event either Ecology or the City determines that additional
permits or approvals addressed in RCW 70.105D.090(1) would otherwise be required for the
remedial action under this Order, it shall promptly notify the other party of its determination.
Ecology shall determine whether Ecology or the City shall be responsible to contact the
appropriate state and/or local agencies. If Ecology so requires, the City shall promptly consult
with the appropriate state and/or local agencies and provide Ecology with written documentation
from those agencies of the substantive requirements those agencies believe are applicable to the
remedial action. Ecology shall make the final detennination on the additional substantive
requirements that must be met by the City and on how the City must meet those requirements.
Ecology shall inform the City in writing of these requirements. Once established by Ecology,
the additional requirements shall be enforceable requirements of this Order. The City shall not
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 20 of21
begin or continue the remedial action potentially subject to the additional requirements until
Ecology makes its final determination.
3. Pursuant to RCW 70.105D.090(2), in the event Ecology determines that the
exemption from complying with the procedural requirements of the laws referenced in
RCW 70.105D.090(l) would result in the loss of approval from a federal agency that is
necessary for the State to administer any federal law, the exemption shall not apply and the City
shall comply with both the procedural and substantive requirements of the laws referenced in
RCW 70.105D.090(l), including any requirements to obtain permits.
P. Indemnification
The City agrees to indemnify and save and hold the State of Washington, its employees,
and agents harmless from any and all claims or causes of action for death or injuries to persons
or for loss or damage to property to the extent arising from or on account of acts or omissions of
the City, its officers, employees, agents, or contractors in entering into and implementing this
Order. However, the City shall not indemnify the State of Washi,ngton nor save nor hold its
employees and agents harmless from any claims or causes of action to the extent arising out of
the negligent acts or omissions of the State of Washington, or the employees or agents of the
State, in entering into or implementing this Order.
IX. SATISFACTION OF ORDER
The provisions of this Order shall be deemed satisfied upon the City's receipt of written
notification from Ecology that the City has completed the remedial activity required by this
Order, as amended by any modifications, and that the City has complied with all other provisions
of this Agreed Order.
X. ENFORCEMENT
Pursuant to RCW 70.1 05D.050, this Order may be enforced as follows:
A. The Attorney General may bring an action to enforce this Order in a state or
federal court.
B. The Attorney General may seek, by filing an action, if necessary, to recover
an10unts spent by Ecology for investigative and remedial actions and orders related to the Site.
Agreed Order No. DE-07TCPHQ-5024
Page 21 of21
C. In theevent the City refuses, without sufficient cause, to comply with any term of
this Order, the City will be liable for:
a. Up to three (3) times the amount of any costs incurred by the State of
.Washington as a result of its refusal to comply; and
b. Civil penalties of up to twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per day for
each day it refuses to comply.
D. This Order is not appealable to the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board.
This Order may be reviewed only as provided under RCW 70.1 05D.060.
Effective date of this Order:
CITY OF BREMERTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Phil Williams
Public Works and Utility Director
--~..The City~0fBremerton.._~~m ...-....
Bremerton, Washington
Telephone: (360) 473-2376
Tim L. Nord
Section Manager
~-- ~~~Toxics-Cleanup Program--~.. ..~.- --.
Land & Aquatic Lands Cleanup Section
Telephone: (360) 407-7226
EXHIBIT - A
" "', '''jt '~..J . '" .=.... .". ""-~"r'~~'~ ..,. ')' .' - 'I" I' 'I' 'om' iI~ (../~ .,v I ,j fP' ,.'~~.~ '~' / / :.. ../, "1' ..< ','
71' "'~-_._- -- .-.-.-c- ' .' . =='-1 'TJ"=-;==l=-" r " I"j .,<"",..Ii I ,~
1\II'il-./--l~~' .~t._:,/ I~/ :"'=(~~J' :'.' ~J/f '!'\I'~b11\ tl ;,.~.' (~ .~ ';;~"r"~.,~.,,.{
'r'n \0 i/ ___~~! [~;J;._..; t_j~:~~.-",:.." ..J...: :. 0 !~ II~); .'l:[: r!: \) (1(: 0\ 1 " '., :"'1~ 'I ((\\')J' \~\ ~~~
.! \ . ~-;!'.-;-F..q='l 7'- t ~'T~~a5~:\ ',-- I r-"("'-:... rrlL3 r)!i {::: U! /:: ~-;', L'. v) I) \ ;d,tit~
. ~\,'~ \..~. II }~TI . ; :.( :~ . :/?B~ehterj;bntJ\ ~'-/, ;-\ \ \ U~ ef!~. k~:ii ! ~\ '" ( ,.,// / I ,: \\~-U~
\ :-----,- :t:'"JiI\ -,1' 1,,-1 . ':! ,. D.~. ~ { \ ..... '\.....fI..-..... \_ \ \ II/ ,.i .:":1: .-" .s.53 ,~/ l .111:'::'-; 1 ...
~~'~ I (,Uo ;:: ~!: ~. 'W :, .;:'C~.' 1/ '"' \. ':l."d\. 1\ -1...!11lfl" A,' '?:;J; .)i l'\" :~i ' .' ~/..~. _!~\
\: .~~'::\ ,\. ~~. M U '0..f ;;;;.., . =........,', ~~ v, . I, X' ~.1 LJ :Yr~'.. ! \~,." JI. j. r .
'1:.'~~~:~'K':'~\~\::"\-: ../:,~ ~ ~. ",---T..~, i~ \. \ ---"" j;: 't \jlT')l,j \~. .u."t' ,! \". ,,;. .~. ..1 ,f" lJ)';:
....~\'.,:.... .....,:.......j n'I:~ ~ ~, I.', ( ~ L-.t/'.'....... O..ft' /( I'~ .,~f. .~.......\..'...I.I il/'
~,." ",'-. -.- -. t '\. . ',) r==. I ~.- .. I r L!
' . . .~... ,':,' cb~~_ I~,;~~.\ . 'rc-..~" ~\ ') I \'4 ~I ( r r;f" ")) \ --, "~ . I ~. ,::
,~\ ..; :~. .:. ~.u,,..:;>::-~:_~-...'::. :""-;: ~~ . , .: :::.. I ,,' . \ ~. " .' ': L, ..\ '-.' '..::>,'
1 'l.. :~\ \.'--:" ,..J-- ::",-;~:" J 6J-'~1~' " .. ~ . 5"I~tl~~( <eS[]' - . ()-/--::;;:--'I ' \ ',V- .I' ], I' \ ~.~ <;~
-.) tr:: \ ~nl....." ~ 1- I!~:"~ ,1... ,1r t~~, tJ l'i ~I. .~), \ . Ij( ~I J ===- '(--'__'"' :_-11
'-. . ." ""' - ~..,-.., -.I'---.j'. __' i1-:::7 ~\ ,~,...,JI ~c !Jfib'i:~"',. i~1 iller T~I-. \:-:--=-113 5,' . . J. ..... c. ~ .. ;:--2;
'~('~?-"""\ '..,> L.:~-., :.7. .:;;,:-iL/:: !j ~ I~":I~ ~ )b#-;-<"""IJ:Y'~.' ,:... '" ,: r~'CC_-;~' "'-./~
~\ .:.".... ' ." '-~:. ........ I_,,,-',--,,~. \ '. )>: "('~ I' I~II' . ........., ""....'''-. ./':J'
",,""\ ~ ---, ) e' ,I \ 1 '. (' ( ;. "" ,: '''--.:' . 'I' k ,\ , . '~.."l' ) / IX:'
, ~",\'. .....~.'..,. ..:(...i__4'..~~~.I'\"- ,.....:!""'~-=::'I I,t\.-!: Ivi355 .. w.~1 ~",:,..?",), I '"......../ .~.:.
~,..,~ -t'~... 'y--:. '\0/..(0....,-,,\ \ ~- "'\"~'''' "//~Ki~ "':m'{Jt'..,::;'-=-'.r"\~~e-o /?,.,':
~" "". i'~\_ .{i~~" "-'~'\,\'.::"i"d2!~~kn:~, '~"i@', ~\~ ,~/ Uu I;"i~ :\!~. ,"'~" /'/":';"~I
':I~\ .... <PC(.... '. ~'-'- "'-' 'fr,. ,;';:~>~~~}\(, r~,\-:::I;-"=~~~\\,~ /:~~I,... '1Qk ,':.", ~.,.~ .~;:<t::..J>?/b/
..J r~ v ~ " " ..U .0='\' Yl'jl" ,~ ., \ ' ~':,;~-:J I ~ ;;=:__'.....~~ ~"""\ ..... ./~/ I, /6".'
l)"~,~ ?'-/7'"D ~k' ~"l:'~;:; .......: ~:\ . "~~;I (--->~... .!.~ ,1 ~.~ \. '-.'\ ,.,..... ," /m'~~' ,:\i \\,.,\ ~.=-;;,(~\';'%>:.:::::Zl; .;;fl?~
-.,...-- oc ~.. oJJ' ,"'. ....... 0 ~ .. r'" ~ ; , i\" r=r=: ' " '(,., .\ "..., ! __ J-: /:!1:!- '-
I F"l \ " -" '--"j , ", . \."..... : - i 'I-', '.;~;.:.. <-v;rr ' \' 'r '" .<-~~ I~,} :~.;1-.~/-II:'{ ~
'. - -- ........" r'. o\~-- cp.- '-01 K ,.' ;"'n.~ ~~'II, " .. l;l ~ lit! ,I.~
-\.,.11 39 , \ .... OT\ $'" ~:., . ,.,' ',' /r. .. 1'1~:E>.." B,~ "r, · "viii /'~"j
,- 'Q 'I / t.-.h' ) '. ~-:-." -:..- . I I _.~ ".\,.,.) .... .
. -....:....0.. ;;-., -... ::': " ... -, F=" . I ~ ,w'~...:t!\ .~.~ ',' ! I ,""'0 \.. i;'" "I till..
I ~ f ~ r .. ,.)! ( .-' ~ -__ I ( , " IJ\'" 1'" " IV!
- .' "'B b~;.. p~, ;~-;: ~ · 0~i- ;,'.. it \\ . I ~ I I, \ ,~) /;;,j,/I!:..\~V,~8!1I'/"
,.::.fiTi '-' -. ,r.. _ tl' - '. _ Ji'~"-;..,,: c;€.--, ~"),'::l\ : 7;''' .i I: }", I ~ II I i \ \~d )'~~i/~''l.'.
.. . c \ f _\ '_. ~'- ~__ .:7"~... . ').:-I.J! ~ I -/ 'I I I..... ;~,I\lr"'<';~~~/I:.
I:) j ,; i, ;: ',.COll~,... '. ,~....:--. "-, '''~>-" (fl" _ I ii\) 1\' .. :h~ A ' "iI..
= nl r! i j.. :' "{'?-::;,," ~7-'.. --:-' / ~ ~" .~( ~':1: \, 1\ .:/) ~. I) ""'" ~\" _:.-
;I r ,.\:.1,/ "~'., .. Q;:--I~ -- ." /~~ '0.::, "POot" .... " f p~ 7 .
." .:\.\.. \ I (~) ....:1~ . ~1!t~1 ;- -'~~~ . ../~,,, ....)0. Area",. .. ,.....! ,'j \. / / ;\,.;.;,K, ':. , /
I :', \ \, rl I'~~~ f: ~ JF<~ O'~" '- ~. ')''''(1 Iii.
...!, ill I : , .. " I'-~"..l()) pIC i ' ... ,,>. "';'" ) " . ///). r-, I'" II
~)\ 'I (' - '1/ \~' 1(' \,r" '.' ,.-reo ege ~!b R- . ,~~': ~ ' I' '~ L'~ ~~;: . ))U;/~.' /~!- /
~dl ~n . "'!(~IM I-l '~I' IN oi' rv!eJ01 '" .._.~' ,SITE Ir') '\ 193 ;: f"."./~~I(~ '. .'.,;:<.:.....( ~c.'"
~ 15 "-L..;.J ..:..::: l...W ~;" _ ~ ~ Iill! .0 '-. '\ii,~iNN.' ;:;, 'l~ \ '/cP IJ I ~ "$.;h~;.. / 'I
' 'Ml: '. ' lnf1lfij ~~. I 3~DrF1f--7'.. ~ "'~""\\..;.."':'~' J",,)<(. ~..... J. ~gt(-:;'/ /
~I- .~ I : 44, ; DQO.....[]. , lr~./~lll.~q-.E.. ~~. \/t~~~ l' ~I 'J;:;~,>.I (l'~ /1
r,. l U ,': r 4~-..;.,"""'_ :." \'r- . .. e' 'j(~ /.. ( I
./. I:, i '-: 1 . · y. <0 ,\ _. h :-- . _ rr.:_,~' #..- 7~I..._._./--_.- u
. " '-" ....:"....... ,\,:....?...-_-...-:~~I.\ ;.:lV-I:;;;!!." / I
",. W ~i ~. J!~.; \ }.\ E'1'1"~\\', '/ ll!J/ I /
~ i Fi J J \ i~\ r-A,Ar-l,DGE: /,:~~ I 'I' /. I
<( , , ' ... \ F< . '" :\~ = /.. /
~ = i ~ , .l, i "'. ...., ~ I.. /
' I'''' .' 303 r=;t \ -., ~ "------ -, I
.f J. \ \.. D ,.... - ar, 1 ~~. :' .i> -'.' '..'\ ~..:. :"... . ,"/
~p 3 .., ,r... n II 'L \..' r'"' i )(" / '->, . . .\ ........-:.. .... . '
\\ ' ,.:::--: 6TH. n \ mo iif co' S'T \ 0 .. (l~ir:,' (, ~ . ..::~ ~ Point' r(erron
rl~.' \' I '-, ILL--, (II . ~ . ~ r'\ ~ .e:. "03 '"'-~. . . "" *'. ...>...... ,
I \. I .' J ~ " ~....... ___-........'.. ._"./ "-
I is h' . tz.. '\~ --., \ 'r--:.b~: <-<:r ".. '..-=-;-:~.' " ,
. . ....... I, , ,:r-<<!nt ....-.!?".-,..(. /', ).'
~l'~ ~ I I" . ~dl.'TurR~..r.... . '-bght.. y//' " ,/', ~
'; ;, :Ill' radio Towe, ....,.... /: , -,' C'''<l "
. . -c'J .., I' :~,' I' - ~~ KBRO ',/ ,x, v.. ,
I u \, ~o' I ,.-(,. I Mll'..... ..... ,'"
\ \ 'yt< . I'" . '~ _ .... -,,'
. I )'-.....,1 ,'-., T'O~\e,r.",Ji-.J I ", l' I".. ~ 1IP" -- . -" 1'~
~~ ~ . .'" Ii, t- ,.,0.\. -', "'..
(I j \ -, ~\i~ I/L I.#~ 1 Il~H~ ..~t~~~:'W-:.;~;O'..'\\ --- ~ _." // ",
<( I Pu1 'r, s u: :Wi-~~L . ~iVA!, 1'::, ~.'\' '~..- I ,r ....
. \ \ ! '.. ~! :...:' J ,1. i ::::.--:../.0' X p~' GET.SOL'SO ,JIt-:>-,' ,
" \.. v ..!J,.I. ~ ,', ' ,. .
I" ." VAL .llt~).A..~O _",r ~
( ~,'='.irA'., ) U i.: I / \ I .--.---.. N
..2.,_.. {". :~~~I"'I'~I('~~1ttll' i /.. \~i\
!~ . j:rl,I' tlr:;~:. '1':; "'_rl. /" \ S .....
::1:'" .....~, :t+i+ .@l~ .@ ..,1 ~, ..;' ............... ~ \ '/ \
tJfi4/ IInF-L ii, ,.- ~ V..\ __
,
,
- ~ -~.'
1",.'
. ..,
.!"~h
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5' TOPOGRAPHIC
QUADRANGLE SHEETS "SREMERTON
EAST, WASH." AND IISREMERTON
WEST, WASH.II
o
I
2000
I
SCALE IN FEET
4000
I
-~~
Geo ~~ Engineers
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1
Page 1 of 1
Search Results
K;;\,i',~~yJ:$~~rqh'l;(,1
Data Tax i Section
Change Assessor Sales Permit Tax Account Taxpayer Township Account Site
Map Request Data Data Data Statement Number Tflxpayer Address Range S_taJJ.J~ Address
i 345 6TH
! 3709-001- CITY OF STREET STE NW/4 1310
~ GO GQ GQ QQ 003 -0 102 600 13 24N A .HIGHLAND
.<~ BRI;:MER TON
(1422765) BREMERTON IE AVE
! W A 98337
i
Tax Statement
Page 1 of 1
I I I Elected
Home Departments Officials
I County
Services
I I I I Parks 8<
Resources Environmental Elections/Licenses Recreation
20061'
$221,360
$0
$221,360
- - ---- ~___h__ $0-
2006 General Property Tax +
ssessments = $1,460.26
View: Receipt(s) on file
[Click here to Print]
Barbara Stephenson
MAKE REMITTANCES PAYABLE TO:
Kitsap County Treasurer
PO Box 34303 Seattle, Washington 98124
For Informational Purposes Only
Process Number 1422765
~axpayer Name:
ITY OF BREMERTON
Account Number
3709-001-003-0102
I
BAYVIEW ADDN
BLK 001 LOT 3 NL Y 104FT ALSO LOTS 4 & 5 TGW TH TPN OF BLK 6 LOT 1
DAF BAT SE COR BLK 4 BAYVIEWTH N37*49W 133.53FT TH N23*00W
60.6FT TO X MEA LN & TPOB TH N23*00'W ALG SWL Y MGN HIGHLAND
PROJ NL Y 105FT MIL TO X WITH LN 50FT DIST MEAS AT RIA SEL Y FR
CTRLN OF EXT TRANSMISSION LN SD TRANS LN OAF BAT MON AT PAC
& 11TH ST TH NOO*38W ALG CTRLN PAC 778.42FT TO X CTRLN OF
TRANS LN CROSSING WH BEARS N44*15' FR SO PT ON SWl Y MGN
HIGHLAND AVE PROJ NL Y N44 *15'E PL T & 50FT DIST SEL Y FR CTR
I VALUE INFORMATION FOR TAX
2005
$199,420
$0
$199,420
"$0'
Tax Property Description
Land:
Improvements:
TOTAL VALUE:
.. 'Frozen Base:~-- ... ..-
Exemptions (if any):
olal aual~ing Exemptions:
$0
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE:(Land + Improvements minus Qualifying Exemptions)
$199,420 $0
Levy Code 0010
General Levy Rate per $100011.6241
Voted Rate - 36.2 % Voter Approved
[Click here to Pay by Credit Card]
[Click here to Pay by E-Check]
2006 WEB TAX STATEMENT
Printed:10/2512006
CITY OF BREMERTON
345 6TH STREET STE 600
BREMERTON, WA 98337
I GENERAL TAX DISTRIBUTION
I 2005 I 2006
12005 Totat $.0012006 Total:
I
I
I
$.00
Current Taxes
fA,SSESSMENT 2005 200E
Noxious Weed $1.02 $1.02
iA.smt Total $1.02 $1.02
$0
Delinquent Section
. Year Taxes
InUPen to
10/2006
Total Delinquent Amt Due:
Total Collection Cost:
Total
$.00
$.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE:
$173.21
First half taxes paid after April 30th will incur interest plus
penalty computed on the FULL year amount (RCW
84.56.020).
Account Number: 3709-001-003-0102
(1422765)
...n..................................................................................................................~........................~.n....................................._.................._...._......n.................._........................n......................................................
If you did not make a first half payment or pay
the delinquent taxes listed, if any, call
(360) 337-7135 for delinquent lax, interest and
penalty due. Delinquent payments received
without interest and penalty will be returned.
See Treasurer Information link.
TOTAL I
Half I
$173.21
$.00
I
$173.211
2
CITY OF BREMERTON
345 6TH STREET STE 600
BREMERTON, WA 98337
Make Remittance Pavable To
Kitsap County Treasurer - PO Box 34303 - Seattle, WA 98124
hHw//kr.wnnllh2.co.kitsan.wa.us/nls/ilisw/lis.lZenerate web statements pkg.web stateme... 10/25/2006
Kitsap County Parcel Search Map
Page 1 of 1
Applications
Parcel Search
Hazard Locators
Voter Information
Maps & Data
Map Library
Download Data
Section Downloads
Data Change Request
Resources
What is GIS?
Quick Facts
Site Map
Related Links
GIS Home
Contact Us
Location
Directions
Parking
Comments
Last Updated:
June 28, 2006
L .--.---.- --...--.-..-....-...-.....--
I~~I g~!ClI.().Qs_ 211
KITSAP COUNTY PARCEL SEARCH
Zoom to an area: I~~~~I~'
-~
r---- "" 1:---7'0" ~Q
~---T-..J " ~d'I_ / ,', ~
, I '""Y. ,. . ',"'l"
!-_J_,,/ __ '1-... // ,,/' \, ~o'
i i .,."', ~ / , ~t-
r---..~... . ~ ~ .,' ./\ <$'.
3709-001-003-0102 '. :./ ""
Copyright @ Kitsap County 2006
.r...~-"..r'-
w..
Search by Tax Account
A full or partial tax account numbe
. .I::::--:--==.=--===:..:::~:::-:::::.:::=:::-~:~.:~--.!-._---.- . .--..
~-.,.,"
Search by Address
Do NOT enter Street Direction (E,'
(St., Ave., Blvd., etc.). A list of potE
displayed.
L. .!....-- j L. ........ .---.. .... .-- -- .... ..
__ Show 2005 \
-
__ Shl
.~~.~
Copyright @ 1995-2006 Kitsap County GIS. All rights reserved.
Prival4' Policy- Disclaimer Comments/email
1. ~._. I n_______..t." ~~ lr:+M~ mn "... Im"'hC';t"'/....."'rf'pl "'P!Olrf'h/nrf'<:p.nt~ti()n/c.h::lmeleon/maD.asD?C... 1 0/25/2006
J
LU
::l
Z
LU
>
c:(
~
a:
c:(
c..
~
,
,
.
PACflC
ENVIRONMENTAL
GROUP, INC.
"
,,~
.
LIGHT
INDUSTRIA
EVERGREEN. .
PARK
~
~>-
~
~
~.
"'Q
~
~
SITE LOCATION ~
~~
~O
~
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL - 0
Q COMMERCIAL ~
~~ ~~
t.. %
1 .~ ~
. "1t.; ~
RESIDENTIAL ~ 1-
~
'\
RESIDENTIAL
r \
11TH PLAlli n
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
12TH STREET
w
RESIDENTIAL
I
o
SCALE
~
200
~
400 FEET
DECOMMISSIONED CHEVRON BULK TE:RMINAL #61001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, Washington
EXTENDED SITE MAP
FIGURE:
2
PROJECT:
520-41.01
EXHIBIT - B
EXHIBIT-B IS THE FINAL REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATIONIFEASIBILITY STUDY AND
INTERIM ACTION WORK PLAN. THIS WILL BE
INCLUDED LATER.
EXHIBIT - C
CHEVRON BULK PLANT PORT WASHINGTON NARROWS SITE
APPLICABLE RELEVANT AND APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS
Chapter 70.1 05D (Model Toxics Control Act, and Chapter 173-340 WAC (MTCA
Regulations)
Chapter 173-204 WAC (Sediment Management Standards)
Chapter -197-11 WAC (State Environmental Policy Act)
Chapter 43.21C RCW
Chapter 90.48 RCW (State Water Pollution Control Act)
Chapter 70.105 RCW (Washington State Hazardous Waste Management Act), and
Chapter 173-303 WAC (State Dangerous Waste Regulations)
Chapter 70.95 RCW (Solid Waste Management-Reduction and Recycling)
Chapter 173-201A WAC (Washington Surface Water Quality Standards)
Shoreline Management Act, Chapter 173-14-28 WAC
National Toxics Rule: 40 CFR 131.36.
Chapter 173-160 RCW (Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells)
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), 29 CFR Subpart 1910.120
Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA)
EXHIBIT - D
.:<.
..
fUlllITlI SUTI
IlrUTlllT IF
ECOLOGY
, -
, . ~ 1 ' .
. .. . , -
Toxics CI~a]lU])"PJ';ograllt,ro]iCJ ,', ' ,
Policy 840
- ResoUlce Contact: Policy and Technical SuppOIt Staff Effectiv~. August 1, 2005
References. WAC 173-340-840(5) Revised' September 9,2005
http://www.ecv.wagov/eiml
htto:/ /wWw.ecv. wagOVlPIOeramsltCO/smulsedqualiirsthtm
http://www.ecv. wagovlbiblio/0309043 ~
Replaces.' Procedure 840
Policy 840: Data Submittal Requirements
Purpose: Contamin,:tted site investigations and cleanups generate a large volume of environmental
monitoring data 1hat need to be properly managed to facilitate regulatory decisions and access to this
da,ta by site'owners, consu1tants~ and the general public. The purpose of this policy is to describe the
requirements for submitting environmental monitoring data generated/collected during the
investigation and Cleanup of con~mimJted sites undeI the Model Ioxics Control' Act (MICA) and
'the Sediment Management Standards, .
,Applic.ation: Ihis policy applies to Ecology staff, potentially liable parties, prospective pl,JI'Chasel's,
, state and local agencies, and Ecology contractors that inveStigate 01 manage the cleanup of
CODmmin8ted sites.
, -
1. Unless Otherwise Specified by Ecology, all Envb-onmental M~mitoring Data Generated
. ",,'- duting ColitaDilil~ted' SifeIiive~tigationSan(rCteaDiipsnshaJf belbqufiedfobe' -----,.- ____..u__.
Submitted to 'Ecology in both. Written a~d Electronic Format.
Environmental monitoring data include biological, chemical, physicaI, and radiological data
, generated 'dming site investigations and cleanups under the Model Taxies Control Act Cleanup
Regulatio~ (WAC 173-340) and the Sediment Management Standards (WAC 173-204).
. Data geneIated!colIected during site inv~gations and cleanups conducted under'an order, agreed
. oIder or cpnsent decree, permi~ gIan~ loan, contract, interagency agreement, memorandum of
understanding or dUIing an independent remedial action, ai~ considered environmental monitoring
data. under this policy.
Data generated/collected fOI non site-specific studies, site hazard assessments that result in no fiutheI
action and initial site investigations are not considered environmental moni~oring data wider this .
'policy. "
2. Orders, Agreed Orders, Consent Decrees, or Permits Issued After the Effective Date of
this PoliCy ShaD Include a Condition that Site-Specific Data be Submitted in
Compliance with this Policy.
Reports on such work that do not include documentation that the data have been submitted in
compliance' with this policy shall be deemed incomplete and a notice of such provided to the
, ,
Page 1 of5
ReviJed- September 9,2005
Policy 840 Data Submittal Requirements .
submitter. These reports generally should not be reviewed until that information is provided The
: assistant attOIney geneIal assigned to the site should be consulted in these situations.
3. Reports OD Independent Remedial Actions Submitted for Review After October 1, 200S, ,
Under Ecology's Voluntary Cleanup Program Shall Not be Reviewed Until the Data
Have Been Submitted in Compliance with thiS Pollcy.
Such Ieports shall be deemed ~complete~ and a notice to this effect provided to the submitter.
4. Grants, Contracts, Interagency Agreements or Memoranda of Understanding Issued
After the Effective Date of this Policy ShaH Include a Condition that Site-Specific Data
be, Submitted in Compliance with this Policy.
Reports on such work shall not be accepted as complete 1Dltil the data have been submitted in
compliance with this policy. If a paym~nt or transfeI of funds is involved in the transaction, the
relevant payment 01 transfer shall be withheld uilti1 this requirement has been met.
Example language'to include in these documents is attached in Appendix ft.-
,5. Data Generated During Upland Investigations and Cleanups ShaD be Submitted
ElectronieaUy Using Ecology's Envirolimental Information Management System (ElM).
. . .
ElM is Ecology's main database for environmental monitoring data. Proper submission of data "
tlno~ this system meets the requirement of submitting such data in an electronic format.. . Electronic
data shall be submitted to Ecology simultaneously with the accoDlpaI?-ying printed report.
..----..-..-.._____~________.___________~_._"___n_____._____.__.._____________ _____ ___ __~ ___ _ _________ ___ _~__ ____ _ __ __ _ ~~_ ____ _ _______ ________
. Addi~onal in:fOIlIUltion o~ EM, including instructions faI data submittal, can be found on EcO~~gy's
: EIM 'web si~ at h1:W:lIwww.ecy.wagovleiml.ICP.sEIM Coordinator also'is availiWle for techDiCal.
as~ fu site m~nls:!gers and consultants using EIM. .
6. Data Submitted Electronically Using ElM: Shall be Checked by the Toxics Oeanup
PrograDi.'s EIM Coordinator Prior to Loading the Data into ElM.
" .' .' ' ..".
NonnSIiy, ~tice that data have been ~tted through ElM: will come to rep's EIM Coo~-
Upo~ receipt of such. a notice the ElM: COOrdinatoI 'should notifY the ~ite manager_ Similady, if the-
ECOlogy site ,manager receives a notice of an EIM submittal, they should notify TCP's ElM .c,
Coorditiator-. Upon receipt of the data, Tcrs EIM Coordinator reviews the subinittal for quality
control and officially loads the data into the system.
7. Data Generated During Sediment Investigations and Cleanups shall be SnbntittecJ
Electronically Using E.cology's Sediment Quality Information System (SED QUAL).
'SEDQUALis Ecology's data m~nagement system fOl sediment-related data. Proper sub~io:n~f
data through this system meets the requirement of submitting such data in an electronic fOI:Q1aL
EI~tronic data Shall be submitted to Ecology simultaneously with.' the accompwiyin~ printed repOIt
Revised. September 9, 2005
Page 2 of 5
I
!
I
i
I
j .
1
I
I
f
i
I
...,,____ _u__ Lu___
I
.
I
1
.
1
I
I
I
i
i
i
I
i
~
l
i
1
;
i
, Policy 840 Data Submittal Requirements '
8. Sediment Sampling Data Shall be Submitted to Ecology Using the SEDQUAL Data
Entry Templates.
At a minim~ the following SEDQUAL data entry templates must be completed:
I. Reference & Bibliography: Describes lab reports and publications that Ielate to the data
being entered;
2. SUIVey:- Sample mnnber; .
3, Station: Specifies geographic location of the sediment sample. Sample,latitudellongitude
coordinates must be entered using the N oIth American Datum of 1983 in U.S. Survey feet
(NAD 83, U.S. feet);
4. Sample: Describes sample characteristics such as depth; and
5. Sediment Chemistry: Reports chemical concentration data iri dIy weight units.
The folloWing additional templates must also be completed where these measurements/observations
have been made:
"1. Bioassay: BioaSsay test results;
2. Bioassay Control: Bioassay'control test results;
3. Benthic Infauna: Species abll"rl::m{"..e & diversity;
4. Tissue: Describes the organism collected; {
, 5. Bioaecumulation: Reports tissue chemical concenlIations; and
______ -"____ ~__ ___ ____ __6.._.HistQpath.~Jog)'::_Rep-Qrts_ tissue_pathoIQgy:.such_as_tumoIS. .odesionsL___~_______________ .:.__.u u_ ____
9. Electronic Data Formats ShaD be Ve~ed,to be Compatible with SEDQUAL Prior to
Submittal.
Because.8EDQUAL uses ASCII protocol and comma delimited text files, data fOImat verification
shall be conducted prior to submittal to Ecology. Data shall be verified by downloading the
SEDQUAL database, impoIting the data into the database, correcting eIroIs, and then exporting the
COIrected templates.
For- additional information on sediment sampling and analysis plan requirements, see Ecology
publication 03-09-043 "Sediment ~ampIing and Analysis Plan Appendix". ApIil, 2003. A copy of
this docwnent can be obtained fioni Ecology' s publ~cation office or downloaded from the following
web site: htto://www.ecv.wagov/biblio/0309043.htmI
- Additional information on SEDQUAL can be found at:
http://www.ecv.wa.lZov/programs/tcp/smulsedaualfirst.h1m. I CP's SEDQUAL CoordinatOI is also
available fortecbmcal assistance to site managers and consultants using SEDQUAL.
10.. Sediment Sampling Data Shan Also be Submitted to Ecology in a Printed Report
Printed reports shall present the data in both ~ weight and total organic carbon normalized units in
data tables that compare the results to applicable state Iegulatory criteria.
Page 3 of5
Revised: September 9, 2005
PoliCy g40 Data Submittal Requirements
11. Data Submitted Electronically Using SEDQUAL ShaD be Checked by the Toxies
Cleanup Program's SEDQUAL Cdordinator Prior to Loading the Data into sEDQttAt.
Normally. SEDQUAL data submittals will come to ICP's SEDQUAL CoordiDator. Upon receipt of a
submittal, the Coordinator should'notify the site manager. Similarly, if the Ecology site mRnager
receives a SEDQUALsubmittal, they should notify rCP's SEDQUAL Coordinator. Upon receipt of
the data, rcP's SEDQUAL Coordinator reviews the submittal for quality control and officially loads
the data into the systen:L
Approved'
~~ClJJ-
James J. PendoWsld, ~gram Manager
. Ioxics Cleanup Progtam
" -..
..(
Poliq Disclaimer: lhis policy is inteDded solely for the guidance of Ecology staff. It is not infp!ntleil)
and cannot be relied on, to create rights, substantive or proceduial; enforceable by any party in litigation
wi1b:the state of Washington. Ecology may act at valiance wi1htbi$ policy depending on site-specific
circumstanCeS. 01 modify OI withdraw this poliCy ~ any time. .
"
Revi.sed~ September 9, 2005
Page 4 of5
, ,
Policy 840 Data Submittal Requirements
APPENDIX A: MODEL GRANT AND PERMIT CONI>mON
The following condition is to be inseIted in permits, gran.~, loans, contracts, interagency agreements,
meInorandmn of understandings where site-specific environmental monitoring data is expected to be
generat,ed: .
All .sampling data shall be submitted to Ecology in both printed and electronic formats in
accordance with WAC 173-340-840(5) and Ecology T oxics Cleanup Program Policy 840: Data Submittal
I
Requirements. Electronic submittal of data is not required for site hazard assessments that result" in no
further action and initial site investigations. (FOR GRANTS & CONTRACTS ADD: Failme to properly
submit sampling data will 'result in. Ecology withholding payment and could jeopardize future grant
funding .)
Page 5 of5
Revised. September 9,2005
ATTACHMENT -1
un ______. ,__ _ _~____ __~_ __~._____ ~________ ___
o
Chevron Property Environmental
Conditions Assessment
Preparedfor
City of Bremerton
3027 01ympus Drive
Bremerton, Washington 98310
Prepared by
Parametrix
5700 Kitsap Way, Suite 202
Bremerton, W A 98312-2234
360-377-0014
www.parametrlx.com
June 2005: 255-1896-064
~~~.-
"MIll
CITATION
Param.etrix. 2005. Chevron Property Environmental
Conditions Assessment. Prepared by Parametrix.
Bremerton, Washington. June 2005.
Chevron Property Environmental Conditions Assessment I
City of Bremerton
CERTIFICATION
The technical material and data contained in this document were prepared under the
supervision and direction of the undersigned.
(/l~~~,0
/' ------
~----
kCA(
Approved by Bill Webb
June 20051255-1896--064
r~r~~n_..
--
"'<iI
Chevron Property Environmental Condltionl A.ssulment I
city or Bremr:Jton -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EX ECUTIVE SUM MARy................... ................. ....... ..... .......... .... .......... ............. ES-1
1. I NTR ODUCTION .............. ....... .... ..... ..... ...... ............ ............... ......1 ... ..... ... I' ......1-1
1.1 SCOPE ....... ............................ ............ ............................................................ ........ 1-1
1.2 OBJECfIVE ................... ....................................................................................... 1-1
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY CONSIDERATIONS..................................... 1-1
1.3.1 Regulatory Framework .............. ..................... ............................ ......... ........ 1-2
1.3.2 Cleanup Criteria and Extent......................................................................... 1-2
1.3.3 Stakeholder Responsibility .......................................................................... 1-3
1.3.4 Property Value ............................................................................................. 1-3
1.3.5 Funding Opportunities ............. ....... .............. ................ .............. ....... ...... .... 1-3
2. BAC KG R au N D ....... I........ I" I... I.................... .... I' ..... I. .................. I... ..... ..... ... ....2-1
3. SITE DESCRIPTION ............. ...... .......... ............. ............. ................ ......... .... .... 3-1
4. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND REMEDIATION .......~..............................4-1
5. CURRENT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ........................................5-1
--- 5-. t----- SOIl;;:-::::: ~-:-;:-::-:;-::;;;. :-.:;-.--;;;-;-;;;-;;:--; ;;;;:;;.-;:;-.--;;;; ~~-.--.~;-;;-;;;;;;;;;;-;;; ;;;;-;;;;;;;-.-; ;..-;;=;;; .;...;.-;.;;..-....... .-5-1- ----~-- - ---
5.2 GROUNDWATER .. ........................ .... ................................................. ........ ......... 5-1
5.3 SEDTh1ENT ...... ...................................... .............................. ..... ......... ......... .......... 5-1
5.4 PHASE-SEPARATED HYDROCARBONS ........................................................ 5-2
5.5 SUMMARY OF CURRENT CONDmONS........................................................ 5-2
6. DATA GAPS ....... ........ ............... ........... ..... ..................... .................................6--1
7. CONCEPTUAL REMEDIAL ACTION AL TERNA TIVES..............................;....7-1
8. RECO M M EN DATI ONS ......................................... ..................................... ...... 8-1
8.1 CONSIDERATIONS FOR PROPERTY ACQUlSmON ....................................8-1
8.1.1 Future Use of the Property ........................................................................... 8-1
8.1.2 Regulatory Framework and Risk Threshold ................................................8-1
8.1.3 Project Costs and Funding Opportunities .................................................... 8-1
8.2 RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVES AND FUNDING OPTIONS ...................8-1
June 2005: 255-1896-064
I Chevron Property Environmental Conditions Assessment
City of Brcmertoa
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
9. LI MIT A TIO NS II ... ............... ................... ........ ... II ...... ......... .......................... ...... 9-1
10. REFERENCES... .................................................................................... ........ 1 0-1
LIST OF FIGURES
2-1 Historical Photograph of the Site During Operational Years with all Site
Improvements in Place (1963 - 1988). .................................................................. 2-1
3-1 Site Map .............................................. .............. ...._..... ........................................... 3-3
LIST OF TABLES
5-1 March 2003 Groundwater Sampling Resultsa ....................................................... 5-1
5-2 Phase-Separated Hydrocarbon Measurements a.................................................... 5-2
8-1 Alternative Cost Scenarios.................. ......... .......... ............. .............................. ..... 8-2
8-2 FlUlding Scenario for Independent Remedial Action............................................. 8-2
APPENDICES
A Contaminated Site Development Strategy Letter
._ '____ ._]3 u__~~~~~~~ ~e~~~!~f~a~l}?,~s':l~e.s.!~~is~ __ ___
C List of Reviewed Documents
D Remedial Alternatives Detail
ii June 2005: 255-1896-064
E'r.I&.~- _,
Chevron Property Environmental Conditions Assessment I
City of Bremlll'lOll
ACRONYMS
Agreed Order
BTEX
City
DNR
Ecology
MLLW
MfCA.
SVOC
TPH
VCP
Agreed Order of Consent
benzeze, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes
City of Bremerton
Washington Department of Natural Resources
Washington State Department of Ecology
mean lower low water
Model Toxies Control Act
semi-volatile organic compounds
total peteroleum hydrocarbons
Voluntary Cleanup Program
June 2005 : 255-1896-064
iii
-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Tbe City of Bremerton (City) is considering the acquisition of the former Chevron Bulk Fuel
Facility located at 1310 Highland Avenue, Bremerton, Washington. This property is adjacent
to Evergreen Park Phase n and is being considered for the expansion of Evergreen Park and
possible integration into the Washington Avenue Sewer Replacement Project. The objective
of this assessment is to assist the City in making an infonned decision regarding the purchase
of this property. This report sununarizes findings from a historical document review, provides
cost estimates for remedial alternatives, and provides recommendations for the city of
Bremerton for considering the acquisition of this property.
The fonner Chevron Bulk Fuel Facility occupies an approximately 1.5-acre site that operated
as a bulk fuel terminal from approximately 1950 until it was decommissioned in 1988.
Practices at the facility have resulted in contamination to soil,' groundwater, and possibly
sediments. Previous site remediation has removed much of the phase-separated petroleum ~":. ~
products floating on the groundwater surface and may have reduced the mass of contaminants
in soil. Gasoline, diesel, heavy oil, benzene, and lead remain in groundwater and/or soil at
concentrations exceeding the Model Toxics Control Action Method A regulatory limits.
Significant data gaps exist that prevent characterization of the site inCluding a lack of recent
soil and groundwater data, limited sediment data, an absence of fate and transport information
or a site conceptual model, and limited monitoring points along the shoreline to evaluate
contaminants the may migrate off site at the likely point of compliance.
An evaluation of potential remedial alternatives was completed to assess regulatory and cost
criteria for possible site cleanup. The results of this evaluation. suggest that the City consider
two alternatives for remediation:
· Alternative 2: Point of Contact Compliant Soil Capping System with
------- ------Giounnwater l\fomforiDiC-::': The-soil'cappmg--ilItemative-'proVides--i-barnerto----_u
receptors for the upland portion of the site. This alternative does not provide
containment for groundwater contaminants to migrate off-site. Institutional controls
would be required to ensure protective conditions are maintained. This alternative is
unlikely to substantially reduce petroleum hydrocarbon or lead concentrations in soil
or groundwater to below regulatory limits. This alternative offers a lower cost with a
lower level of containment than Alternative 3. Estimated Cost: $681,000.
· Alternative 3: Point of Contact Compliant SoU Capping System and Cutoff
Wall with Groundwater Monitoring - The cap/cover plus cutoff wall alternative
provides a higher degree of containment than the cap and cover alternative as it
includes additional containment of the upland material along the shoreline.
Institutional controls would be required to protect against exposure to subsurface
contaminants. TIlls alternative is unlikely to substantially reduce petroleum
hydrocarbon or lead concentrations in soil or groundwater to below regulatory limits.
lbis alternative offers a higher level of containment with a higher cost than
Alternative 2. Estimated Cost: $1,100,000.
In addition, consideration of future liability and funding considerations suggests that the City
should pursue and Agreed Order of Consent with the Washington State Department of
Ecology (Ecology) to implement Alternative 2. Operating under and Agreed Order with
Ecology would make the City eligible for grant funding under the Brownfields program for
assessment and cleanup grants with a maximum value of $550,000 and fimding from Ecology
for up to 50 percent of cleanup costs. Both of these alternatives assume 20 years of
monitoring and no work beyond the parcel boundaries.
June 2005 : 255-1896-064
ES-I
lKl'-'f.'OIlI _ ---
Chevron Property Environmental Conditions Assusmmt I
City ofBremertOD
1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Bremerton (City) is considering the acquisition of the fonner Chevron Bulk Fuel
Facility located at 1310 Highland Avenue. Bremerton, Washington. This property is adjacent
to Evergreen Park Phase II and is being considered for expansion of Evergreen Park and
integration into the new Bremerton Boardwalk and Washington Avenue Sewer Replacement
project. This report summarizes the findings of a document review performed to evaluate
conditions at the Chevron Property and to provide cost estimates for possible remedial
alternatives. Considerations for the City regarding acquisition of the property include future
re-use of the property. potential liability, cost for acquisition and cleanup. and community
value.
1.1 SCOPE
As part of this task. historical documentation provided by the City of Bremerton was
reviewed. cost estimates for potential cleanup scenarios were prepared and a meeting with the
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) was held to discuss possible technical
and administrative alternatives for remediation.
Other actions performed included a review of a proposed Purchase and Sale Agreement
between Chevron. USA and the City of Bremerton. and sediment sampling to evaluate
whether or not contAmination appears in the nearshore sediments.
The scope of this report does not include aU criteria set for under ASTM 1527-00 or EPA
AAI under 40 CFR Part 312.
--- -1~2 OBJECTIVE-----
The objective of this review is to assist the City in making an informed decision regarding the
purchase of this .property by summarizing environmental conditions at the site. evaluating
possible remedial alternatives and developing recommendations regarding potential cleanup
liability to the City associated with acquiring this property.
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY CONSIDERATIONS
Chevron has provided the City of Bremerton with a proposed purchase and sale agreement
for the Chevron property. Under the current purchase and sale agreement. Chevron would
transfer all future environmental liabilities to the City of Bremerton. A detailed response to
the liability considerations regarding hazardous materials is docwnented in a letter dated
April 22. 2005 from Parametrix to the City of Bremerton. A copy of this response is included
in Appendix A.
In considering potential cleanup liability or actions that may be associated with the
acquisition of the Chevron property, the City of Bremerton should understand the following:
. Regulations that will define any future liability
. Cleanup criteria and possible extent of cleanup
. Responsibilities of all stakeholders
. Appropriate property value
. Options for funding a potential cleanup
These considerations are described below.
June 2005: 255-1896-064
1-1
I Chevron Property Environmental Conditions Assessment
City of Bremerton
1.3.1 Regulatory Framework
This law governing this site is the Model Toxies Control Act (MTCA) (Chapter 70.10SD
RCW). According to MTCA Regulations (Chapter 173-340 WAC), the City may perform and .
Independent Remedial Action, enter the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP), negotiate an
Agreed Order of Consent (Agreed Order) or take no action which may result in a possible
enforcement order, each of these is discussed below:
· Independent Remedial Action: Undertaken without oversight or consent from
Ecology, this approach would allow for maximum control by the City but would not
necessarily resolve long-term cleanup liabilities (if Ecology is not satisfied with the
cleanup or if additional contamination is identified, Ecology may require a more
comprehensive cleanup) nor does it provide for the opportunity to received cleanup
funding from Ecology.
· Voluntary Cleanup Program: Undertaken in cooperation with Ecology, Ecology
provides oversight and review of cleanup activities with the goal being"issuance of a
"No Further Action" determination. Up to $200,000 of eligible cleanup cost
reimbursement is available through Ecology following the determination. It may be
problematic for this site to receive this determination.
· Agreed Order: A negotiated agreement with Ecology which. defines the
responsibility and extent of cleanup for a site. This approach transfers a levd of
control to Ecology and provides an opportunity "to receive funding from Ecology at
up to 50 percent of the study and remediation costs.. An Agreed Order was negotiated
for Evergreen Park Phase II. Ecology is currently considering whether or not that
Agreed Order could be extended to this site.
· . -NoAction:--The€ity may opt to"take no "action-anhis-site:The "site-lfas beenliStea-m--
with Ecology. Ecology has the option to issue an enforcement order if they believe a
cleanup solution cannot be achieved through negotiation or if there is an emergency.
If the City takes no action and Ecology chooses to issue an enforcement order, the
City has the option to perform the cleanup as directed by Ecology or take no action at
which time Ecology may undertake the cleanup and recover costs from the
responsible party at up to three tiines the actual cost of cleanup. In addition, the State
Attorney General's office can fine the party in violation of an enforcement order up
to $25,000 per day of violation.
1.3.2 Cleanup Criteria and Extent
Any cleanup action taken at the site should be designed to limit exposure to human and i
sensitive environmental receptors either by physically containing the site to avoid contact or ,
by removing sufficient contaminated material to eliminate the risk. The City has the option to
negotiate both the criteria and the extent of cleanup under an Agreed Order or through the
Voluntary Cleanup Program. Any Independent Remedial Action should also be based on a
defensible cleanup criteria scenario. A general understanding of cleanup criteria and extent of
cleanup that may be required for this site would be useful in determining which approach
would best meet the needs of the City.
Default cleanup criteria are available Under MTCA Method A. MTCA also provides the
responsible party with the option to develop risk-based criteria specific to their site. Chevron
has not developed these criteria, nor is these criteria developed in this report. The default
criteria are often more stringent than criteria negotiated based on site conditions or risk to
human health or the environment.
1-2
June 2005: 255-1896-064
~~~
J
Chevron Property EnvircmmenlaJ Conditions .4ssessmenl I
City ofBremer1OD
The default extent of cleanup includes all areas impacted by the release(s) and is not limited
to property boundaries or shorelines. Under an Agreed Order, the extent of cleanup would be
negotiated and defined. Under the VCP, it may be possible to negotiate the extent of cleanup,
but the larger site definition is generally followed.
1.3.3 Stakeholder Responsibility
A clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder would provide the
City with additional information for negotiating both the purchase and sale of the property
and assistance in negotiating and funding any potential cleanup. Stakeholders include:
. Chevron currently holds responsibility for all environmental impacts.
. Ecology is the regulatory agency and has access to funding for public agencies.
. Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR) owns the tidelands which may
be impacted by releases from the site. A tidelands lease appears to have been
rescinded by DNR, citing future use of the area, disposition of existing improvements
and potential for contaminated sediments. A copy of the lease information is
provided in Appendix B.
. The City of Bremerton is. the potential purchaser and owns adjacent property that
may be impacted by releaSes from the site.
1.3.4 Property Value
- .' The assessed value of the property for taxing purposes is approximately $200,000. The
appraisal provided by Chevron values the property at $730,000. The City should consider
. ..__. whether ornotadditionalevaluationoftheproperty_V'a.lll~j~w~~. ..... ..--- ----- ._n__un_
1.3.5 FUJ::ldlng Opportunities
Several funding sources are available, depending on the approach identified. Funding sources
for this project include:
. Ecology may provide Site Study and Remediation Grants if they are involved in the
remediation.
. EP A Brownfields offers assessment and cleanup grants and cleanup loans.
. Private Investment such as service organization contributions or foundation grants for
park development.
. Park development grants through the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation.
Evaluations of these steps related to a cleanup alternative are addressed in Section 7.
June 2005: 255-1896-064
1-3
2. BACKGROUND
The Chevron Site was developed in 1946 and expanded up to 1963. It operated as a bulk fuel
tenninal until it was decommissioned in 1988 (Ecology 1991). By 1988, all buildings and
major facilities were removed with the exception of a pier, and some of the concrete slabs and
asphalt paving (GeoEngineers, 1988). Previous site remediation included active product
removal and installation and operation of soil vapor extraction system. These remedial
activities have removed phase-separated petroleum product floating on the groundwater
surface and may have reduced overall soil contamination. However, gasoline, diesel, heavy
oil-range hydrocarbons, benzene ~
and lead remain in groundwater
and/or soil at concentrations
exceeding MTCA Method A
regulatory criteria. Figure 2-1
shows the Chevron Bulk Fuel
facility during operational years.
Figure 2-1
Historical Photograph of the Site During Operational Years with All Site
Improvements In Place (1963 -1988).
June 2005 I 255-1896-064
2-1
...
---
3. SITE DESCRIPTION
The former Chevron Bulk Fuel Facility occupies an approximately 1.5 acre site located at
1310 Highland Avenue, Bremerton, Washington. The site is bordered by Highland Avenue to
the southwest, a privately-owned property to the south, and the Port Washington Narrows
waterway along the eastern and northern portions of the site (Figure 3-1). The site elevation is
approximately 10 to 25 feet above mean sea level. The facility is divided into the upper and
lower yard by a wooden and concrete bulkhead. These structures are not visible. The Upper
Yard is located on the sOuthern half of the property; the Lower Yard is approximately 10 feet
lower in elevation than the Upper Yani and is located on the northern half of the property.
There are currently no above-ground structures in place on the property. There is an existing
concrete pad, and evidence that a soil vapor extractions system and several monitoring wells
are still in place below ground. The site is vegetated with Scotch Broom, blackberries and
other light vegetation, a derelict pier is located on the western portion of the site.
Soil borings indicate that subsurface soils consist of silts and silty sand on top of either
Vashon Till or fill material. The area beneath the Upper Yard consists ofVashon till, dense,
low-permeability glacial flour. The area beneath the Lower Yard consists primarily of
imported fill material. The fill is approximately I8-feet thick (pacific Environmental Group,
1994). Some large concrete pieces (rip rap) were encountered during soil boring advancement
near the shoreline in the Lower Yani (GeoEngineers, 1988).
June 2005: 255-1896-064
H
-
SMITH'S COVE
I .
Parametrlx
o~
DIllE: 06IlI:wa 3_ F1LE: 8Rt_POt'Tll1P-F2
120
1
Figure 3-1
Plumber's Union
Project Location Map
SCALE IN FEET
4. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND REMEDIATION
A review of existing documentation related to environmental conditions and cleanup actions
was provided by the City of Bremerton. This documentation was reviewed to compile the
summary presented in this section. A list of all documents reviewed for this report is provided
in Appendix C.
Active environmental investigations began on the site in 1988. Chevron advanced 12 soil
borings and installed monitoring wells in nine of these borings. Soil and groundwater samples
were collected and analyzed for gasoline. diesel #1. diesel #2. and benzeze. toluene.
ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX). Sample analyses showed all areas of the site contaixied
petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in excess of MTCA Method A regulatory standards.
with the. highest concentrations found in areas where above ground storage tanks were
historically located. Groundwater was DOted to flow to the north. (Geo-Engineers, 1988).
Ii1:> June 1989 Chevron installed a product recover)" pump to remove phase-separated
hydrocarbons. This pmnp operated in MW -4 and MW -6 and removed approximately 2S
gallODs of petroleum product 'over a one-year period. In addition. field technicians removed
approXimately 22 gallons of product from wells MW-9. MW-13. MW-14 and MW-15 over a
7-month period in 1990 (Hart Crowser, 1991).
Additional investigations continued wtil 1991. some of the initial wells were lost or
destroyed and additional wells were installed.
In 1991, the Department of Ecology performed a Site Hazard Assessment for the property.
Chevron representation was present during the sampling phase of this assessment to collect
split samples for independent analysis. Groundwater and sediment samples collected were
analyzed for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOC), total peteroleum hydrocarbons
... {TPH);-- total-lead;- and - benzeze,-toluene,ethylbenzene, - and.- xylenes- BTEX._ Because__ oL_______
surrogate and spike recovery issues at the laboratory and low relative percent difference
between the split samples. this data is unreliable. Results of petroleum hydrocarbon levels
generally suggest contamination in the range of 50 to 400 mglkg and lead analyses showed
lead levels ranging between 10 and 100 mg/kg (Ecology, 1991. Hart Crowser, 1991b).
As part of the Site Hazard Assessment. Ecology estimated quantities of liquid hydrocarbons
at the site to be approximately 135,000 gallons; Chevron estimated quantities of liquid
hydrocarbons at the site to be approximately 8,4S0 to 13.550 gallons. .
In November 1990. Chevron installed a soil vapor extraction system (Hart Crowser, 1991c).
This system ran until 1994 at which time the recovery rates leveled off and were too low to
justify the cost of continued operation. It is estimated tl1at approximately 195,000 pounds of
hydrocarbons were removed using this technology (Emcon. 1998).
In 1994. Chevron performed an air sparging pilot test at the site which indicated that air
sparging technology would work at the site. No actions were taken as a result of this test.
Quarterly monitoring of groundwater at selected wells continued through 1997 and semi-
annual monitoring continued until March 2003. Following cessation of the soil vapor
extraction system operations in 1994, no trend showing a reduction in concentrations of
gasoline, diesel or BTEX has been observed.
During initial site investigations (1988-1990), phase-separated hydrocarbons were measured
in a number of monitoring wells with thicknesses up to 4 feet. Since cessation of product
recovery, the presence of phase-separated hydrocarbons is reported to be intennittent. with
measured thicknesses of less than 3/4 inch.
June 2005: 255-1896-064
4-1
lIIII
t~
4-2
-
Two water-bearing units are reported to be present on the site; however, they do not appear to
be distinct. (pEG, 1994). Groundwater very near the Port Washington Narrows may be tidally
influenced (GeoEngineers, 1988); however, wells further inland do not appear to show tidal
fluctuation (Ecology, 1991). No studies of tidal influences on groundwater, beyond an
incidental observation, were found in the data.
June 2005: 255-1896'{)64
-11I-
5. CURRENT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
This section presents a summary of CWTent site environmental conditions based on a review
of documentation provided by the City. With the exception of three sediment samples
collected, no investigations were performed in support of this report. The information related
to soil, groundwater, sediment and phase-separated hydrocarbons presented below is
collected from previous investigations. The most recent data reported was collected in 2003
and would not meet the standard for ASTM-1527 or prospective purchaser under EPA
40CFRPart 312.
5.1 SOIL
Very little is known about current soil conditions at the site. No soil investigations were
performed following the remediation actions taken in the early nineties. Prior to remediation
activities, gasoline and diesel were detected in the soil at 100-200 times MTCA Method A
regulations and BTEX concentrations were detected in the soil at up to 40 times MTCA
Method A regulations (Ecology 1991). The vapor extraction system installed in 1991 and
operated until 1994 is reported to have removed 195,000 pounds of hydrocarbons :from the
site. It is anticipated that concentrations in the soil today would be reduced in comparison to
the results of initial sampling.
5.2 GROUNDWATER
The most recent groundwater data was collected by Chevron in March 2003. Groundwater
samples were collected from six wells, the results of these analyses are presented in
Table 5-1.
Table 5-1. March 2003 Groundwater Sampling Results.
Contaminant
MTCA Method A:
MW-6
MW-9
MW-18
MW-21
MW-22
MW-23
Diesel (uglL)
500
4,400
6,300
80,000
970
1,500
270
011 (ug/L)
500
4,100
2,400
<10,000
NO
500
NO
Gasoline (uglL)
800
1,200
8,200
810
6,500
100
NO
Benzene (uglL)
5
39
550
NO
NO
0.89
NO
. (Gettler-Ryan, 2003)
5.3 SEDIMENT
Ecology and Chevron collected sediment samples in 1991; however, the results were rejected
due to data quality issues. No other sediment evaluations were identified in any of the
docwnentation reviewed. Three composite sediment samples were collected as part of this
assessment on April 26, 2005. The samples were analyzed for gasoline, diesel and heavy oil.
No contaminants were detected in any of the samples. The samples were collected from an
area west of the existing pier where staining was noted in 1991, at a location approximately
ten feet east of the end of the shoreward portion of the derelict pier and at the southern .
boundary of the property. line 72 feet from the bulkhead. During the sampling effort no
June 2005: 255-1896-064
-
5-1
discharges onto the beach were observed and no sheen, odor or obvious staining was noted
(parametrix, 2005).
5.4 PHASE-SEPARATED HYDROCARBONS
Phase-separated hydrocarbons were observed in some wells during the 2003 groundwater
sampling event. Table 5-2provides a summary of free product observations.
Table 5-2. Phase-Separated Hydrocarbon Measurements.
Sheen or measurable product
during at least one observation
Maximum Product Thickness
Recovery ActIvities
Historic (1988-2002)
11 of 17 wells
Current (2003)
3 of 17 wells
4 feet
Active pump system installed,
bailers used during sampling
events.
Less than ~ inch.
Recovery not practical.
"Gettler-Ryan. 2003
5.5 SUMMARY OF CURRENT CONDITIONS
Groundwater currently exceeds MTCA Method A regulatory criteria. Soil conditions are not
- known but historically have exceeded MTCA Method A regulatory criteria. Historical
sediment data shows contamination, but recent sampling did not show contamination. All of
the data presented in this section is limited by the data gaps discussed in Section 6. Additional
...-.-------- ---- characterization may-be-requireddepending-on-theselectedapproach,-. ------.-.----..---.---------- --- .--
5-2
June 2005: 255-1896-064
rl)i~
"'" -
-.--
-
.-z!I
--
6. DATA GAPS
Based on information reviewed, several data gaps were identified tbat may affect a
prospective purchasers future cleanup liability. This means that Ecology could require
additional sampling prior to negotiating cleanup criteria and extent or the City may elect to
. perform some additional sampling to better understand conditions prior to deciding on a
regulatory approach. While we believe that sufficient data exists to prepare cost estimates of
potential property liability, these factors do create some level of uncertainty.
Data gaps include:
. No data since 2003: Two year old data does not meet the standard for AAI under 40
CFR, Part 312 or the guidelines set forth under ASlM 1527-00 that may affect a
prospective purchaser's future cleanup liability. ;It is not known if site conditions
have changed since 2003.
. Absence of fate and transport information: No data exists to establish trends in
natural attenuation processes. While considerable chemical data is present, no
determination of natural degradation processes (methagenesis, sulfate/iron reduction,
etc.) and no mobility modeling bas been performed.
. No Site Conceptual Model Exists: No site conceptual model bas been developed
. for this site. A site conceptual model may be recommended or required to develop
risk-based cleanup criteria
. Limited coverage for monitoring points: Several of the wells located along the
edge of the property have been damaged or lost and no data is available for these
locations. Without adequate coverage for sentinel wells, the levels of cont::lmin::lnts
that maybe migrating_offthe_propertyjs_not~W!l-______-':_ ______._._ _~_ ___ _u__m m____. __
. Unknown soll conditions: Site soil data were collected prior to the implementation
of any remedial actions. Current soil conditions are not known and the volume of
continuing source material that may remain at levels exceeding MTCA regulations
cannot be evaluated..
. Sediment data is indicative rather than definitive: Sediment data is sparse,
limited in quantity with no off-shore data collected. Three sampleS were collected as
part of this assessment and indicated that no hydrocarbon contamination was present.
Ecology of the Washington Department of Natural Resources may require additional
characterization to demonstrate that impacts are not present in the off-shore
environment.
. Impacts to adjacent properties are unknown: Cont::lminants from this site may
have migrated off-site to an adjacent property. Potentially-impacted properties are
owned by the City of Bremerton, Washington Department of Natural Resources and
privately-owned parcels to the north. Consideration of the tenns of the purchase and
sale agreement should include a discussion of the potential liability from these
adjacent properties.
The lack of information regarding current soil conditions, sediment conditions, and lack of
recent groundwater data or adequate coverage for monitoring wells present the most
significant unknowns for this site. Additionally, the lack of a site conceptual model may
make it difficult for the City to negotiate less restrictive cleanup criteria. Future actions to
address these unknowns are impacted by the stakeholder responsibilities and regulatory
scenario selected for this property as discussed below:
June 2005 : 255-1896-064
6-1
. Under any scenario Ecology may mandate or the City may elect to install additional
monitoring wells to evaluate groundwater conditions at the property and to collect a
baseline set of groundwater data from selected wells. This would mitigate the data
gaps related to a lack of recent data and limited coverage for monitoring points.
. Under an Agreed Order, the level and extent of any cleanup would be negotiated and
defined and Ecology would identify any additional investigation requirements. This
would help to mitigate the liability associated with impacts to DNR properties and
the possibility of a future enforcement order from Ecology. In addition, collection of
fate and transport information or the development of site conceptual model would
likely not be required. This may also eliminate the need to collect additional soil or
sediment data.
. Through the VCP the City would likely be required to collect additional soil. and
sediment data to develop a cleanup action plan. This would resolve the data gaps
related to unknown soil and sediment conditions.
. Under a "no action" or Independent Cleanup scenario the City may additionally elect
to install borings to evaluate current site soil conditions and to consider future
liability as unidentified source areas may ~st. This would resolve the data gap
related to unknown soil conditions.
. Under an Agreed Order or the VCP, additional sampling of soil, groundwater and
sediment data would provide a basis for the City to negotiate risk-based cleanup
criteria which may be less restrictive. This would resolve the data gaps related to
unknown soil and sediment conditions.
6-2
June 2005: 255-1896-064
1.'I}l~_
"
7. CONCEPTUAL REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Several remedial alternatives were developed to assess potential cleanup costs for the site.
The remedial alternatives evaluated range from no action with monitoring (low cost, low
effectiveness) to significant excavation (high cost, high effectiveness).
A list of remediation options was considered in developing the remedial alternatives. These
options are listed below.
Groundwater
The following remedial options were used in developing alternatives for grOWldwate.r
remediation:
. MonitoringINatural Attenuation (20 year duration) - Monitor six wells semi-annually
for 10 years, annually for 10 additional years.
. Dewatering - Maintain groundwater levees below the existing hydrocarbon "smear"
zone to aid removal of residual free product, reduce potential for migration of
contllmimmt,o; in soil, and possibly enhance natural attenuation processes.
Soil
The following remedial options were used in developing alternatives for soil remediation:
. Cap and Cover - Install cap consisting of a g~composite clay liner and clean soil
cover layer.
. Cutoff Wan - Contain site groundwater with an oil-resistant geomembrane or sheet
_____pilewalL_ _ __ _____________ _ __ ________ __ _n_____ _U__
. Soil Excavation - Excavation and offsite disposal of contaminated soil. This option
is included for completeness to provide an upper bound remediation cost.
An in-situ remedial alternative, Oxygen Releasing Compound, was considered but it was
determined that this site is not a good candidate for this type of remediation due to the
presence of free product in some wells and soil conditions.
Sediment
The following remedial options were used in developing alternatives for sediment
remediation:
. Sediment Removal- Excavation of a 3-foot layer of sediment located between the
toe of the shoreline bank and the mean lower low water (MLL W) line. Sediment
would be excavated in the dry during low tides and disposed of off-site in a Subtitle
D landfill. This estimate is based on an assumed volume of 3,000 cubic yards.
. Sediment Capping - Placement of an oil-resistant geomembrane and 3 feet of cobblyopit run fill over sediment located between the toe of the shoreline bank and the
extreme low water line. Exact dimensions are unknown, and a 50xlOO foot impacted
area was estimated for purposes of estimated costs.
The remedial alternatives presented below were developed from these options. Details and
estimated line item costs associated with these alternatives are provided in Appendix D.
(1) Monitoring with no active remediation or institutional controls such as deed
restrictions.
June 2005: 255-1896-064
7-1
kJI".:'-.
7-2
-
(2) Point of contact compliant soil capping system with monitoring and institutional
controls such as deed restrictions.
(3) Point of contact compliant soil capping system and cutoff wall with monitoring and
institutional controls such as deed restrictions.
(4) Cutoff wall and dewatering with monitoring and institutional controls such as deed
restrictions.
(5) Point of contact compliant soil capping system, cutoff wall and dewatering with
monitoring and institutional controls such as deed restrictions.
(6) Cutoffwall and soil excavation with limited monitoring.
Each of the upland alternatives were evaluated for effectiveness/risk reduction,
implementability, and cost. The scoring analysis used to evaluate the alternatives is presented
in Table 8-1. The alternatives which presented the highest value based on these eval~on
criteria are summarized below.
· Alternative 2: Cap and Cover with Monitoring - The cap and cover alternative
provides a barrier to receptors for the upland portion of the site but does not provide
containment for groundwater or soil contaminants to migrate off-site along the
shoreline. Institutional controls would be required to protect against exposure to
subsurface contaminants. This alternative is unlikely to substantially reduce
petroleum hydrocarbon or lead concentrations in soil or groundwater to below
regulatory limits. The preliminary estimate for implementing the cap and cover
alternative is $680,000 which includes 20 years of groundwater monitoring. This
alternative offers a lower cost with a lower level of containment than Alternative 3.
· Alternative 3: Cap, Cover and Cutoff Wan with Monitoring - The cap/cover
- --------pfusuciifofrwaU-attemiiHve woula-proViaC;-a-fUgber-degree-o{coritaiiUileiii-ilWi- the---- -
cap and cover alternative as it includes additional containment of the upland material
along the shoreline. Institutional controls would be required to protect against
exposure to subsurface contaminants. This alternative is unlikely to substantially
reduce petroleum hydrocarbon or lead concentrations in soil or groundwater to below
regulatory limits. The preliminary estimate for implementing the cap/cover plus
cutoff wall alternative is $1,100,000, which includes 20 years of groundwater
monitoring. This alternative offers a higher level of containment with a higher cost
than Alternative 2.
Sediment remediation, if required, is estimated to' cost' an additional $300,000. Please note
these cost estimates are based on the limited site data currently available. Actual remedial
action construction costs can be anticipated to be within -30 percent to +50 percent of the
costs indicated in Appendix D.
June 2005: 255-1896-064
-
-
8. RECOMMENDATIONS
8.1 CONSIDERATIONS FOR PROPERTY ACQUISITION
Prior to acquiring the Chevron property, the City of Bremerton should consider several
factors that may impact the decision whether or not to purchase the property and the terms of
a purchase and sale agreement.
8.1.1 Future Use of the Property
This property is an excellent candidate for future development as. a park. If a capping
alternative is selected, the cap could consist of soil and grass, or other appropriate vegetation
and would be eligible for cleanup grant funding. Future property re-use that would potentially
require disturbance of contllm;nated soils may be problematic unless a soil excavation
alternative is selected due to institutional controls placed at the site under any other
alternative.
8.1.2 Regulatory Framework and Risk Threshold
Any regulatory approach which involves the Department of Ecology has implications both in
regards to liability, and funding. The City should consider the level of risk, benefits to the
enviromnent and community, and funding strategy as some approaches provide an
opportunity for liability reduction, lowered risk to human health and the environment and an
opportunity to pursue State or Federal funding and others do not.
8.1.3 Project Costs and Funding Opportunities
n n_ud ---- The- overall costs -to the-City for the project should.be considered.uThese -would include the un__. _un -- .
sale price of the property, the cost for cleanup or potential costs for no action, the costs for
construction if the property will be re-used, the parameters surrounding funding opportunities
and the overall value to the City.
8.2 RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVES AND FUNDING OPTIONS
Based on the cleanup cost estimates presented in Section 7 and the considerations identified
in Sections 1.3 and 8.1, different programs should be considered during the redevelopment of
this property. While no guarantee exists regarding either Ecology requirements for remedial
action or grant receipt, a reasonable scenario would assume the selection of either Alternative
2 or 3 and a high probability of both Ecology cost match and Brownfields Grant funding.
Sediment issues appear to be negligible however, sediment data is very limited and additional
characterization and/or remediation of sediments is possible. For purposes of this report, it is
assumed that Alternatives 2 or 3 would be selected and that no sediment cleanup would be
required. Options for selecting a cleanup program based on this would include:
. Agreed Order: Under this scenario the City could recover up to 50 percent of
cleanup costs from Ecology. In addition, Brownfields Grants could be used to defray
City expenses. Benefits of this approach include greater access to funding sources as
well as lower long term liability to the City. Risks associated with this alternative
include no guarantee of funding, higher project costs, and the probability that a more
rigorous cleanup alternative (Alternative 3) would be required. Two cost scenarios
were evaluated. They are presented in Table 8-1
June 2005: 255-1896-064
8-1
-
8-2
Wr.-.
Table 8-1. Alternative Cost Scenarios
Total Cost
Ecology Share (50% match, up to)
Brownfields Assessment Grant (no match, up to)
Brownfields Cleanup Grant (20% match, up to)
City Match or Cleanup Grant (maximum)
Alternative 2
$681,000
$340,000
$200,000
$350,000
$70,000
AlternatIve 3
$1,094,000
$547,000
$200,000
$350,000
$70,000
. Independent Remedial Action: This approach is regulated by WAC 173-340-151.
Under this scenario the City would act independently of Ecology, conduct remedial
action, submit a report to Ecology, and await response. Benefits of this approach
include City control over selection of an alternative and lower overall project costs.
This would create less financial risk to the City if no cost recovery occurred. The
limitations of this approach include no possibility of obtaining funding from Ecology,
a lower probability of obtaining Brownfields Grants and increased long term liability
to the City. It should be noted that (based on over 15 years of inaction) enforcement
action at this site is highly unlikely as long as the City makes a good faith effort to
improve current conditions. This does not prevent future enforcement action
however. Should the independent cleanup action be selected, a cost scenario for
Alternative 2 is shown in Table 8-2 (cap and cover would be selected by the City
based on cost).
--Table 8-2. f'undlng-ScenarlofoF Independent-Remedlal- Actlon-
Total Dollars
Total Cost
Brownfields Cleanup (20% match, up to)
City Match
$681,000
$350,000
$70,000
Based on this analysis and assuming that sediments are not an issue, we recommend that the
City proceed with an Agreed Order strategy. Negotiation of the Agreed Order would likely
involve the implementation of a remediation approach similar to Alternatives 2 or 3.
Additional sediment characterization may be required as part of this Agreed Order. However,
this approach is still the best value to the City based on two factors:
. Probability of grant funding for cost recovery.
. Reduction oflong-tenn liability.
June 2005: 255-1896-064
9. LIMITATIONS
The potential for environmental liability associated with the release or threatened release of
hazardous substances. and compliance with federal and state environmental laws, has become
a major concern with many public agencies and private companies considering property
transaction. Federal and state regulations do not specify the amount of effort necessary to
determine environmental status of real property. However, if brought to litigation, the court
will consider specialized knowledge or experience of the def~dant, the relationship of the
purchase price to the value of the property, and the ability to detect such contamination by
appropriate inspection.
parametrix performed this assessment with a limited amount of historical data. Judgments
leading to conclusions and recommendationS are made generally, with an incomplete
knowledge of the subsurface and former conditions applicable to the site and adjacent
properties.
The assessment contained in this report is subjective, qualitative and based mainly on the
professional judgment of the Parametrix staff after review and consideration of available
infonnation. Because site activities and regulations beyond our control could change at any
time after the completion of our observations, findings, and opinions can be considered valid
only as of the date of this report.
9-1
June 2005: 255-1896-064
10. REFERENCES
Ecology, 1991: Site Hazard Assessment Summary Report for Chevron Tank Farm,
Bremerton, Washington, July 1991, Washington Department of Ecology (49)
Hart Crowser, 1989: Letter Summarizing Work Accomplished
GU, 1995: Letter to Rene White RE: Former Chevron Bulk Terminal - Bremerton,
Washington Site Remediation Plans, Groundwater Technology, July 13, 1995
Gettler-Ryan, 2003: Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report, Event of March 7..
2003, Gettler-Ryan, Inc., April 16, 2003 (22)
Pacific Environmental Group, 1994: Supplemental Environmental Site Assessment
Decommissioned Chevron Bulk Terminal No. 61001351, 1310 Highland Avenue,
Bremerton, Washington, Pacific Environmental Group, Inc., March 10,1994.
Hart Crowser, 1991: Status Report Interim Remedial Action Vapor Extraction System
Chevron Former Bulk Terminal, Bremerton, Washington. Hart Crowser, December 16,
1991.
Emcoo, 1995: Letter Report, Fourth Quarter (September 22 to December 19, 1994) Vapor
Extraction System Monitoring, Former Chevron Bulk Fuel Facility 61001351, 1310
Highland Avenue, Bremerton, Washington, Bmcon Northwest, Inc. January 13, 1995.
Parametrix, 2005: Technical Memorandum: Sediment Sampling Results, Former Chevron
Property, "1310-Highland-A. venue~ Bremerton:, W a:shington;Pa.rametriX;MaylO; 2005~-----
June 2005: 255-1896-064
10.]
~~".i~-
APPENDIX A
Contaminated Site Development Strategy Letter
----LI
ATTACHMENT - 2
~J'........
~ ' ....
':.,-\ .
r--!~ 2io I 8
C~\Q\j.~ \CLnk:.- ~V m
I ro(t; \}JA \~Qrrvw.s
GETTLER - RYAN INC. gyemo'---tzsv\
T RAN S M IT TA L October 22, 2003
G-R #386607
TO: Mr. Joe Muzzio
SAlC
2192 Pelican Crest
Santa Cruz, California 95062
FROM: Deanna L. Harding
Project Coordinator
Gettler-Ryan Inc.
6747 Sierra Court, Suite J
Dublin, California 94568
RE: Former Chevron Bulk Terminal
#1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, Washington
WE HA VB ENCLOSED THE FOLLOWING:
_ CO_PIES
DATED
-------------- -- ..-.--
DESCRIPTION
1
October 17, 2003
Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report
Event of September 10,2003
COMMENTS:
This report is being sent for your review. Please provide any comments/changes and propose any
groundwater monitoring modifications for the next event prior to November 5, 2003, at which time the
final report will be distributed to the following: '
cc: Mr. Gerald O'Regan, Chevron Products Company, P.O. Box 6004, San Ramon, CA 94583
Mr. Wietfeld, WDOE, Northwest Region, 3190 l60th Avenue, SE, Bellevue, WA 98008-5452
RECEIVED
NO'J 1 2 2003
DEPT OF ECOLOGY
{
Enclosure
trans/100 13 51-gor
6747 Sierra Court, Suite J . Dublin, CA 94568 · (925) 551-7555. Fax (925) 551-7888
3140 Gold Camp Drive, Suite 170. Rancho Cordova, CA 95670. (916) 631-1300. Fax (916) 631-1317
1~n4 N, McDowell Blvd.. Suite B2. Petaluma. CA 94954. (707) 789-3255 . Fax (707) 789-3218
f: 'I ! ~ t .
EXPLANATION
.
P"..
\Groundwater monitoring well
i(First Water-Bearing Unit)
.
:Groundwater monitoring well
: (Deeper Water-Bearing Unit)
: Abandoned well
[99.99]
NM
99.99
..
,
~~"
,,~~.
,
)(
* : Discontinued from monitoring/
: sampling program
:
VaporExtractlan
Equipment EnclollullI
^
. ~~~S9~,
'f..~ Cb MW-22 ~-t'
,,~-- , 1-
----" 'NM"- ~'''l
\'1- ,lMw 1/t . Fonner MW-7 : ~
MW-a * * - I' 88.40 Walllhouu)( 184.74] I
LDWBr Yard Ll
-,t.. MW-5...... 1M, W.~_: ~UMW-23'Qg ~nd x
::rr : ..dI... ...~.,,~ '''''. c:t~ft. Tanka
\ - ~'''''' 0 -0 ~.' '. /.........,. x
C I,: : ." "'0". -,' '-/ I
88.53 ~'r ..""". .....,;""".."".".; ::':"'W-12': \:-.~ <::> ":
\ . AaPhaij I JrMW-4 '\ r::~'~ ~8 3~. ,... \ ~..: x
'tM~~:l =~ 88.23. 11 \ \ ~ ':::: ~:--::M~12,J J~~'~"" I
\ Racks .,,!I.-"!'- I \ \ \r-;-......::!.~.:--- ~'91..45.^ ><
c9~a ",,88.?0 88.82' ':\..~ -+-=~ i;'_YilaP- 00 .... I
")C. V, 88.3 MW,15 I MW-10 1 MW-24-r...... _ _ _92.: ~
\ '- MW. t I ~ I 1:' ."r.\ M;~~.I(7 ...... ...-- x
")C. ....... II ~.r ~ .'. . f
\...--x MW-20_ _ io*/'f -': loading , -: Former'~ : :
: Rcka ..... " .} Gara -, - : x
~89.64 "".Il"",,; I a ~.: L88.22). g~: ..... .... J
NJI ~ (' ':. : - '".'
~x f\ MW-11\ _~.~.~.....:. x_x_!!!.'!3!-x_X-X
W~~ ~-~X~x--X .
BulkhBOd ""''''.,,'''' I
(Buried) ~~~r 'HIGHLAND AVENUE
Source: Figure modified from drawing provided by Pacific Environmental Group, Inc,
_GETTLER. RYAN INC.
6747 Sierra Ct., Suite J
Dublin. CA 94568 (925) 551-7555
POTENTIOMETRIC MAP
F:ormer Chevron Bulk Terminal # 1001351
1310 ! Highland Avenue
.Bremerton, Washington
DATE i REVISED DATE
Se tember 10 2003
PROJECT NUMBER
386607
REVIEWED BY
Groundwater elevation in feet
referenced to arbitrary datum
Groundwater elevation contour,
dashed where inferred
Not used in contouring
Not Monitored
Groundwater elevation corrected
for the presence of seporote-
phase hydrocarbons
~
Approximate groundwater
flow direction at 0
grodient of 0.008 to 0.1 Fl/Ft.
,
,/ \
o 60
~ I
Scale in Feet
FIGURE
2
Layout Tab: Pot3
MW-4
100.34
98.46
I
I
Tabllf 1
Groundwater Monitoring D~ta and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton,'o/ ashington
,
.... . _. _.'h '. .....
)).1i; ..... .......n.. .....,. . .....
..<~//:1'~~i ........ ..../.
.. ... . -- . . ~J~/:::/:::.::::::'::'.:,..:- .-:":--'."
09/10/88
03/09-10/89
04/04/89
08/07/89
09/21/89
OS/21/93
09120/93
12/23/93
03/25/94
05/04/94
09/28/94
12/09194
03/15/95
06/22/95
09/11/95
12/06/95
03/14/96
06/05/96
09/04/96
12/23/96
04/15/97
09/15/97
12/29/97
03/18/98
06/23/98
03/24/99
08/3 ]/9912
03/17-] 8/00
10/06/00
04/0 1/0 1
09/27/01
1001351.xls/#386607
10.99
12.76
1256
11. 74
11.71
9.29
10.36
10.68
8.33
7.98
9.10
10.30
6.22
8.38
9.33
ORY
9.10
9.90
7.12
6.98
9.63
6.47
10.23
7.05
10.34
7.96
10.81
90.43**
90.74**
91.00**
89.86**
89.77**
91.07**
89.98
89.68"
92.01
90.48
89.36
88.16
92.24
90.08
89.13
89.36
88.56
91.34
91.48
88.83
91.99
88.23
91.41
88.12
90.50
87.65
1.35
3.95
4.02
1.57
1.42
0.02
0.02
Sheen
0.00
Sheen
Sheen
0.00
0.00
0.00
NO
__I
190,000
31,OpO
5,400
13
130,000
NblO
i
580,000
3,200
2,400,000
270,?00
96,000
1,000
6,000
NOlO
NOlO
32,000
-~
I
76,]00
NOlO
973
12,700
-"
68,500
6,~90
746
36.8
1,640
NO
i
8,910
170
NO
NOlO
630
110
NOlO
30
NOlO
NOlO
3,600
8.1
1,900
470
NOlO
99.5
12
222
23,000
79
18
4,800
45
1,300
NOlO
217
35.8
504
As of 09/1 0/03
~k~.lJM...........<pAtlt:....
T()C*<ii)}.>...........
,
... AUa" ...
Groundwater Monitoring D~ta and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
I
Bremerton, yv ashington
MW-4
(cont)
03/28/02
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
8.48
10;23
8.68 .
9.93
89.98
88.23
89.78
88.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MW-5
99.23 09/1 0/88\ 10.05 89.18 , 1,900 360 290 1,900
j
03/9-10/89 8.56 .90.67 5,400 11 ,000 1,400 7,000
04/04/89 8.22 91.01
08/07/89 -i
,
09/21/89 -i
OS/21/93
09/20/93 ...:.
95.96 12/23/93 --
03/25/94 :
.,.
05/04/94 -:-
09/28/94 ,
.,.
12/09/94 5.78 90.18 :
..,..
03/15/95 !
-
06/22/95
09/11/95 .l.
12/06/95 - 8
.;..
03/14/96 5.37 90.59 .,..
06/05/96
09/04/96 8
12/23/96 8
-
04/15/97 8 i
-- I
09/15/97
12/29/97 -- 8 i
8 I"
03/18/98 --
8 I
06/23/98 -- i
..,..
100 135 I.xlsl#386607 2
As of 09/1 0/03
i
i
Table' 1
Groundwater Monitoring Da~a and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal # 1 00 1351
131 0 High1an~ Avenue
Bremerton,Washington
i
.' . . ... ... - .
uP .. n' ......
....... ....-.-.. "'.'.'-,
.... '__0"'"
MW-5
(coot)
03/24/99
08/31/99
03/17-18/00
10/06/00
04/01/01
NOT MONITORED/SAMPLED
8
MW-6
100.29 09/1 0/882 11.08 89.21 2,000 1,500 150 4,300
03/09-10/89 12.76 90.96"'* 4.29
04/04/89 12.21 91.13** 3.81
08/07/89 10.44 89.85 Trace --'
09/21/89 --I
OS/20/93 9.11 91.18 14,000 -I 40,000 820 1,600 640 5,600
98.40 09/20/93 . 9.99 88.41 --,
12/23/93 10.96 87.44 26,000 14,0~0 27,000 1,400 2,300 560 5,000 26
03/25/94 - ,
05/04/94 11.31 87.09 20,000 16,900 21,000 720 1,100 450 2,500 NO
09/28/94
12/09/94 8.92 89.48 18,000 12,000 8,800 58 60 30 1,300 8.2
03/15/95 I
06/22/95 11.31 87.09 9,800 5,800 16,000 110 76 240 2,100
09111/95 10.65 87.75 ,
,
12106/95 6.76 91.64 750 ND 7,500 12 17 20 500
i
03/14/96 8.20 90.20 ,
06/05/96 8.95 89.45 26,700 20,~00 9,780 41.8 22.3 135 1,070
09/04/96 10.50 87.90 I
1 2/23/96 7.65 90.75 T
04/15/97 ,
i
09/15/97 9.83 88.57 3,710 908 10,800 19.6 12.5 126 810
12/29/97 7.76 90.64 ~-
100135I.xls/#386607 ~ As of 09/10/03
MW-6
( cant)
.1 auu~ .1
,
Groundwater Monitoring D~ta and Analytical Results
Fonner Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, V:' ashington
pA.tti
:(::?ttS~DI::!;::::;:)trn~q}:/
.............;.:.;.;.:.;.;...:.;.;.:...;.;.'..;.::...,.;-:.::.:.;;..............'...'.,.:....;...;.;...:.::.;.;................
..... .... ........ .. ....
. . ...... ....
H it::::\Jl
03/18/98
06/23/98
03/24199
08/31/99
03/17-18/00
10/06/00
04/01/0 I
09/27/01
03/28/02
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
7.53
9.65
7.00
10.28
7.85
11.08
8.69
10.84
8.50
10.28
8.74
10.00
90.87
88.75
91.40
88.12
90.55
87.32
89.71
87.56
89.90
88.12
89.66
88.40
I
2,500 Nq
0.00 2,200 2,030
!
0.00 9,490 5,890
Sheen 2,850 1,75,0
0.00 4,60014 . NOlO
,
0.00 5,970 3;7~0
0.00 7,410 5,090
0.00 3,30020 3 30020
, .
I
0.00 5,40020 3,20020
0.00 4,40020 4 10020
,
0.00 1,30010 32010
!
II ,000
216
4,040
1,960
6,020
4,530
4,110
1,400
1,500
1,200
810
39.2
3.95
25.8
21.6
13.5
56.6
25.7
23
21
39
16
12.8 235 1,270
2.94 3.79 13.4
ND10 62.7 131
ND10 22.9 84.4
24.7 39.1 118
6.84 128 281
5.01 35.0 55.6
<5.0 20 32
1.8 12 7.9
1.9 18 22
0.9 5.7 3.1
MW-7
101.25 09/10/883 9.93 91.32 -i ND ND 62 21
03/09-10/89 I
8.36 93.31 ** 0.53 -i
04/04/89 7.64 93.86** 0.31
08/07/89 10.98 91.03** 0.95
09/21/89 UNABLE TO LOCATE
OS/21/93 UNABLE TO LOCATE i
'0
09/20/93 UNABLE TO LOCATE
12/23/93 i
UNABLE TO LOCATE - PRESUMED DESTROYED
03/24/99 UNABLE TO LOCATE --
08/31/99 UNABLE TO LOCATE ,
--
03/17-18/00 UNABLE TO LOCATE I
-
ABANDONED
1001351.xls/#386607
4
AS of 09/1 0/03
. .. _n. _
.D.ATJt<:
MW-8
98.17
95.18
09/10/884
03/09-10/89
04/04/89
08/07/89
09/21/89
OS/21/93
09/20/93
12/23/93
03/25/94
05/04/94
09/28/94
12/09/94
03/15/95
06/22/95
09/11/95
12/06/95
03/14/96
06/05/96
09/04/96
12/23/96
04/15/97
09/15/97
12/29/97
03/18/98
06/23/98
03/24/99
08/31/99
03/17-18/00
10/06/00
04/01/01
NOT MONITORED/SAMPLED
7.18
8.28
13.33
8.39
9
1001351.xls/#386607
91.01"''''
90.48..
85.40"'.
90.07"''''
i
i
Tabl~ 1
Groundwater Monitoring Da~a and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highlanil Avenue
Bremerton,'Yashington
... . _ ..... .....
. - -. . ... . - .
..... . ...--
..... ......P....
0.02
0.74
0.70
0.36
3,900
19,000
2,900
18,000
-'
-'
--
I
,
-.!
i
i
,
!
-T
As of 09/1 0/03
I
Tame, 1
Groundwater Monitoring Da~a and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk 1ierminal #1001351
131 0 Highl8m~ Avenue
Bremerton,~ashington
",::~:':::::::::'.:.'::::.m~ttr:~':;::".i::,:::':'::~1i...:::::::'::":I'f:~:.,.'.::::)::
b '.' .' 'J;.::::: .~({
!
.. .. .
. . - . . . . . .. - - .
. . . . .......
0.... ........
,".." .. .... ".
... . ...... .
.-... ... .. '...
. .. .......
...DA11ti
MW-9
100.34
09/1 0/88s
03/09-10/89
04/04/89
08/07/&9
09/21/&9
OS/21/93
09120/93
12/23/93
03/25/94
05104/94
09/28/94
12/09/94
03/15/95
06/22/95
09/11/95
12/07/95
03/14/96
06/05/96
09104/96
12/23/96
04/15/97
09115/97
12/29/97
03/18/98
06/23/98
03/24/99
08/31/99
03/17-18/00
10/06/00
04/01/01
09/27/01
98.50
100135I.xls/#386607
9.88 90.46
8.34 93.13** 1.41
8.74 92.80*'" 1.50
12.58 90.03** 2.84
10.15 88.36**
7.99 90.51
8.43 90.07
7.81 90.69
9.46 89.04
10.15 88.35
6.20 92.30
7.39 91.11
8.40 90.10
10.15 88.35
6.75 91.75
7.40 91.10
9.95 88.55
6.72 91.78
6.90 91.60
9.63 88.87
6.15 92.35
9.92 88.58
6.69 91.81
11.45 87.05
7.70 90.80
9.63 88.87
0.00
0.00
Sheen
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,210
5,470
4,620
2,290
4,290
5,910
3,560
3,860
3,600
11,900
13,400
I
- ,
-I
,
,
-I
1
-1
5,0~0
5,OQO
--I
3,100
-,
6,O~0
-,
1,590
ND
I
I
-r
I,Q50
1,490
!
q20
ND
796
2,920
939
NDIO
7~z14
3,310
i
4~510
:6
6,100
11,000
1,400
9,800
4,300 370 510 110 980 120
4,200 1,000 1,000 110 750 13
2,000 140 73 65 180 67
4,600 230 84 170 390
2,700 390 110 94 360
7,960 1,140 1,500 124 812
3,370 449 547 III 652
7,700 943 23.6 545 515
306 14.9 4.47 10.2 69.7
10,900 541 252 293 2,190
12,600 980 108 513 2,790
8,850 627 97.7 246 1,310
2,160 333 NDIO 62.3 73.5
16,600 819 186 741 3,760
3,990 437 21.1 75.6 90.1
13,300 621 96.3 666 2,790
4,860 419 19.6 82.3 70.2
As of 09/10/03
Tabl~ 1
Groundwater Monitoring D~ta and Analytical Results
Fonner Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton,Washington
. _. _ . d
....p .... ...
<UATE<>
MW-9 03/28/02 7.50 91.00 0.00 4,80020 1 80020 8,500 480 38 610 1,600
, :
( cont) 09/30/02 9.74 88.76 0.00 3,30020 1,10020 3,000 230 9.5 47 28
I
03/07/03 8.39 90.11 0.00 6,30020 2,40020 8,200 550 52 520 1,000
09/10/03 10.12 88.38 0.00 2,80020 49~20 3,400 360 18 110 40
MW-10
99.94 09/10/886 9.37 90.57 ND ND 350 110
, 6.8 ND 2.8
03/09-10/89 6.54 93.40 -.! 150
04/04/89 6.51 93.43
08/07/89 9.39 90.55 _.J.
09/21/89 ....
OS/20/93 7.64 92.30 180,000 i 1,900 64 1.9 3.9 3.6
-i
98.45 09/20/93 9.97 88.57** 0.11
12/23/93 7.31 91.14 350,000 Np 4,800 23 6.2 26 130 5.4
03/25/94 ,
05/04/94 7.98 90.47 220,000 38,000 3,600 71 ND 7.1 8.2 8.5
09/28/94 I
12/09/94 7.86 90.59 60,000 Np 6,700 ND 4.9 11 21 8.0
03115/95
06/22/95 9.41 89.04 11,000 940 4,300 2.6 5.9 1.8 8.8
09/11/95 10.12 88.33 +
12/06/95 6.43 92.1 0** 0.10 780,000 26,pOO 4,100,000 100 960 1,200 2,300
03/14/96 7.52 90.93
06/05/96 8.80 89.65 9,890 27,600 1,610,000 ND10 ND10 NDIO 1,170
!
09/04/96 10.20 88.25 .f-
12/23/96 7.13 91.32
i
04/l5/97
09/l5/97 9.83 88.65** 0.04 !
12/29/97 :
0.06
03/18/98 0.04 i
06/23/98 9.22 89.33** 0.12
1001351.;ds/#386607 7 As of 09/1 0/03
,
MW-I0
( cont)
... MUA" .A.
I
Groundwater Monitoring D~ta and Analytical Results
Fonner Chevron Bulk Tenninal #1001351
1310 HigWand Avenue
I
Bremerton,Washington
P~~'>:'::.
. . . - . .. . , -..
. ..........,.. ..-...-........- .
.... ..0 _ .. .
03/24/99
08/31/9912
03/17-18/00
10/06/00
04/01/01
09/27/01
03128/02
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
6.11
8.43
6.47
10.52
7.16
10.19
6.78
9.03
7.88
9.63
92.34 Sheen 104,000 NOlO 21,300 2.50 3.14 20.0 43.5
90.02 0.00 _I
Sheen 8,890 1,1~0 4,940 NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
91.98
87.93 0.00 --
91.29 0.00
88.26 0.00 -
91.67 0.00 ...,
89.42 0.00 -- i
. 90.57 0.00
88.82 0.00 .J.
MW-ll
100.03 09/1 0/887 8.45 91.58 NO NO NO NO NO
03/09-10/89 6.03 94.00 NOlO 0.6 0.8 5.2
04/04/89 6:47 93.56 -;
08/07/89 8.65 91.38 .;..
09121189 .,..
05/20/93 7.11 92.92 73,000 .,.. 320 NO 0.7 0.7 1.0
98.11 09/20/93 8.62 89.49 20,000 4,900 600 NO 0.7 NO 2.7 NO
12123/93 6.69 91.42 25,000 6,900 250 NO NO NO 1.1 NO ~
! NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
100.03 03125/94 5.84 94.19 13,000 2,?00 120 -
05/04/94 7.35 92.68 16,000 4,300 350 NO NO NO NO NO
09/28/94 I
9.51 90.52 7,900 2,200 730 NO. 0.9 0.9 1.3 NO
12109194 6.41 93.62 I NOlO ND10 NOlO ND10 NOlO
15,000 3,~00 460
03/15195 3.97 96.06 11 ,000 3,rOO 140 0:72 0.73 ND ND
06122195 8.22 91.81 11 ,000 5,000 240 ND NO NO NO
,
09/11/95 8.67 91.36 13,000 5;500 3,600 NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
12106/95 4.99 95.04 7,300 Ij800 160 NO ND NO ND
, NDIO NOlO NOlO NOlO
03/14/96 6.17 93.86 17,000 5~500 2,300
06/05/96 7.23 92.80 ,
,--
09/04/96 8.45 91.58 I-
1001351.xls/#386607 i8 As of 0911 0/03
i
Tabl~ 1
Groundwater Monitoring Data and Analytical Results
. Former Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton,WasbiJigton
H _ _ ...d
. . _"'._ '_d
..:'DATE::: ::
MW-l1 12/23/96 5.48 94.55
(cont) 04/15/97 6.55 93.48
91.80 2,170 1,Ql'0 679 NO NO NO NO
09/15/97 8.23
12/29/97 5.83 94.20 --
03/18/98 5.95 94.08
06/23/98 8.00 92.03 Sheen -'
, NO 2.20
03/24/99 5.16 94.87 Sheen 1,890 837 231 NO NO
I
08/31/99
03/17-18/00 5.34 94.69 0.00
10//06/00 -
,
04/01/01 6.28 93.75 0.00
09/27/01 9.04 90.99 0.00 :
,
03/28/02 6.41 93.62 0.00
09/30/02 MONITORED ANNUALLY
03/07/03 7.33 92.70 0.00
09/10/03 MONITORED ANNUALLY ..:.
MW-13
97.11 09110/88
03/09-10/89 "7"
04/04/89
!
08/07/89
09/21/89 9.80 87.31 !
T
OS/20/93 7.55 89.56 11,000 9,000 84 22 250 440
09/20/93 8.13 88.98 22,000 8,200 2,800 33 6.4 58 95 100
12/23/93 7.65 89.46 6,700 1,700 1,800 140 27 34 49 NO
03/25/94.' 6.81 90.30 11,000. 4,600 4,600 22 7.0 180 280 NO
05/04/94 8.19 88.92 20,000 7,~00 5,000 15 1.6 67 120 3.1
09/28/94 9.71 87.40 72,000 28!000 17,000 48 13 250 570 20
12/09/94 7.55 89.56 5,800 2,800 360 0.9 NO 6.1 7.8 7.9
03fl5/95 5.40 91.71 3,800 1,400 5,800 2.6 0.97 39 76
100135 Lxls/#386607 9 As of 09/1 0103
,
. aUl~ J.
Groundwater Monitoring Data and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk ;rerminal #1001351
131 0 High1~d Avenue
Bremerton, "f ashington
.. .":,'SPltlfI?){/m!!i,4.!.::!':':::
,:::.' Hbf{)::
:.<...:<-..:..:.-.;:.;...:.....:::..>>;..;.;.
.......... -...........................
....... ... -" ........
.. ",-,'.. .........- ...............
. . - . ... .. . - ... .
.. . .. -.. .
....... .........-.
MW-13
(cont)
MW-14
97.58
. .. ... .-. . ."..
.' .. . - . ..
....... 'D" A:T...E.............
.. ".. .....
. ... .. .. ..
:-,<:>:':":". .: ',-:..::.:-.-
06/22/95
09/1 1/95
12106/95
03/14/96
06/05/96
09/04/96
12/23/96
04/15/97
09/15/97
12129/97
03/18/98
06/23/98
03/24/99
08131/99
03/17-18/00
10/06/00
04/01/01
09/27/01
03/28/02
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
09110/88
03/09-10/89
04/04/89
08/07/89
09121/89
OS/20/93
09120/93
1001351.xls/#386607
8.69 88.42
8.89 88.22
6.00 91.11
7.50 89.61
8.30 88.81
8.90 88.21
6.72 90.39
7.75 89.36
8.42 88.69
6.60 90.51
7.40 89.71
8.37 88.74
6.07 91.04
6.70 90.41
7.55 89.56
9.67 87.44
7.49 89.62
MONITORED ANNUALLY
7.72 89.39
MONITORED ANNUALLY
10.00
7.34
8.85
87.58
90.24
88.73
675
0.00 576
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,800
9,200
390
2,000
58,900
6,630
1,730
742
1,060
791
,..u.
..
i
,
3,3qO 3,400 13 5.2 240 160
8,7qO 7,500 10 2.8 120 35
479 ND ND ND NO ND
2,2~0 110 1.2 ND 1.2 14
24,5~0 6,990 13.9 5.44 374 160
. 3,380 9,160 11.3 11.8 266 61.6
1,850 ND ND NO NO NO
N1;> 105 ND NO 9.53 11.2
NOlO 775 4.42 NOlO 45.4 NOlO
ND NO ND 0.695 NO NO
!
,
Np 1,080 7.70 2.54 209 24.5
NO 82.8 1.92 ND 9.83 3.74
-:-
'-
.,..
,
L
i
i
--
34,000 -- 2,600 75 180 58 250
27,000 2,700 8,700 330 570 350 1,000 46
.0 "As of 09/10/03
Tabl~ 1
Groundwater Monitoring Data and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk 1ermina1 #1001351
131 0 Highlan~ Avenue
Bremerton, Washington
. I
12/23/93 7.26 90.32 13,000 4,100 280 2.1 0.8 1.5 9.8 12
MW-14
( cont) 03/25/94 -I
05/04/94 -,
09/28/94 -:
12/09/94
03/15/95
06/22/95 -- !
09/11/95
12/06/95
03/14/96 6.98 90.60 6,200 2,4QO ND 1.1 ND 1.1 ND
06/05/96 8.20 89.38
09/04/96 10.16 87.42
12/23/96 6.00 91.58
04/15/97
09115/97 9.00 88.58 7,330 1,610 1,380 5.94 2.22 5.36 2.70
12/29/97 6.25 91.33
03/18/98 6.31 91.27 --
06/23/98 9.00 88.58 Sheen --
03/24/99 5.58 92.00 0.00 1,250 ND 51.0 1.17 ND ND L02
08/31/99 9.38 88.20 0.00 68,500 NDIO 119 8.06 ND1o' 2.69 NDIO
03/17-18/00 5.94 91. 64 Sheen 3,510 ND 237 6.97 7.56 5.70 15.5
I 0/06/00 10.15 87.43 0.00 8,570 1,7901S 494 9.85 3.54 23.5 32.9
04/0 I/O 1 7.04 90.54 0.00 5,920 J,~80 <50.0 1.43 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00
09/27/01 9.93 87.65 0.00 12,200 <2,~00 492 8.52 2.84 11.9 12.5
03/28/02 6.80 90.77*** 0.03 NOT SAMPLED DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF SPH
I
09/30/02 9.35 88.22*** 0.03 NOT SAMPLED DUE TO TJ:ffi PRESENCE OF SPH
03/07/03 7.58 90.00*** 0.02 NOT SAMPLED DU~ TO THE PRESENCE OF SPH
09/10/03 9.37 88.23** 0.02 NOT SAMPLED DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF SPH
I
I
lfl(\l'1Cl _1..1#1.Qt;.t:;f'\7
11
As of 09/10/03
,
Table!
i
Groundwater Monitoring Data and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk [Terminal # 1 00 1351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton,~ ashington
. . ... - . . . ..
~~lj:rp/... ......P.4.1!~:...... ...
Xo:(;~.. . ... ... .....:.:....:...:.<..:.:.::..:.<..
MW-15
97.46
09/10/88
03/09-1 0/89
04/04/89
08/07/89
09/21/89
OS/20/93
09/20/93
12123193
03/25194
05/04/94
09/28/94
12109194
03/15195
06/22/95
09/11/95
12106/95
03/11/96
06/05/96
09/04/96
12123196
04/15197
09/15/97
12129/97
03/18/98
06/23/98
03/24/99
08/31/99
03/17-18/00
10/06/00
04/01/01
09/27/01
10013 51.xls/#3 86607
9.90
6.91
9.22
6.61
7.44
6.40
8.48
9.34
5.15
6.35
7.50
9.25
5.78
9.00
7.79
7.65
8.58
5.20
9.12
5.62
9.78
6.39
9.35
87.56
90.55
88.24
.. 90.85
~0.02
91.06
88.98
88.12
92.31
91.11
89.96
88.21
91.68
88.46
89.67
89.81
88.88
92.26
88.34
91.84
87.68
91.07
88.11
0.00
0.00
.. 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,000
2,400
1,500
4,300
4,600
640
4,160
1,510
582
894
2,640
846
2,00014
445
2,930
~
4,600
4,600
190
63
67
2.7
NO
7~0
NO
450
3.5
NO
350
2.2
-:-
1,200
96
1.5
NO
i
72
1.3
NO
233
1.54
NO
266
1.24
NO
110
823
~O
NOlO
<750
730
120
NO
143
269
358
210
653
3.91
3.16
NOlO
1.22
NO
2.90
5.96
i
12
. - - . . .. .. . . .
..... . ..".
...-. -. ... -.
. .q.' .. ..
....'........ ............,..
31
24
0.5
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
0.522
NO
0.681
NOlO
3.14
<0.500
1.73
420
360
4.1
2.0
2.2
1.6
NO
0.769
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
0.606
<0.500
<1.00
280
77
4.9
14
9.8
3.4
4.9
2.3
6.7
1.9
NO
NO
'-
NO
1.11
1.48
1.27
NOlO
1.07
1.66
4.42
As of 09/1 0/03
WELLIDI' ... DATE' .'iirwlP'>
..T......OiC.. .... ."")". #.....).....,.,........,.........,...,............'.....'..... ...,...). . ........... ..........., ..... n'. ,. ..' .... ....
V" .,'.', ,'..".,' "....".. i),)
,
Tabl~ 1
Groundwater Monitoring Data and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton,Washington
i
MW -15 03/28/02 6.51 90.95 0.00 84020 <750fo <50 <0.50
(cont) 09/30/02 8.84 88.61*** 0.03 NOT SAMPLEO OUE ~O THE PRESENCE OF SPH
03/07/03 7.19 90.26*** 0.03 NOT SAMPLED DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF SPH
09/10/03 8.96 88.50 0.00 54020 <250~0 110 0.8
<0.50
<0.50
<1.5
<0.5
<0.5 .
<1.5
MW-16
108.03 09/20/93 16.23 91.80 6,200 1,4qO 670 NO 1.1 1.7 4.1 3.7
12/23/93 12.26 95.77 8,400 1,100 1,300 6.9 1.8 2.2 7.0 ND
03/25/94 9.23 99.10** 0.37 i
05/04/94 12.92 95.44** 0.41 -I
09/28/94 17.29 90.92** 0.22 -,
12/09/94 12.49 95.54 39,000 N910 1,800 2.0 2.1 4.3 6.3 NDIO
03/15/95 8.35 99.68 3,900 N9 1,500 2.2 ND 1.3 1.9
06/22/95 14.20 93.83
09/11/95 16.42 91.61 220,000 14,000 170,000 NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
12/06/95 9.23 98.80 5,800 NqlO 210,000 NOlO NDIO NOlO 43
03/14/96 9.11 98.92 110,000 3,800 590,000 NDIO NOlO 100 240
06/05/96 ~ --
09/04/96 15.90 92.13 I
12/23/96 i
,
04/15/97
09/15/97 ,
12/29/97 -L
,
03/18/98 I
-i
06/23/98 14.90 93.13 Sheen i
08/31/99 16.10 91.93 Sheen 8,820 NO 2,83011 NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
03/17-18/0013 9.01 99.02 0.00 i NOlO NOlO NOlO
2,010 NO 1,870 NO
i
I 0/06/00 16.25 91.78 0.00 2,88016 NO 2,030 ND 2.44 4.11 6.40
04/0110119 12.37 95.66 0.00 168,000 <7;880 2,550 1.44 1.25 2.39 9.90
09/27/01 16.86 9I.l7 0.00 32,700 <5;500 2,340 6.51 <10.0 <10.0 <15.0
03/28/02 9.60 98.43 0.00 46,00020 <10,00020 1,800 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 7.6
1nnl'1C:l _1.../H'1Rhh07 1~
As of 09/10/03
.....,&.;; ...
I
Groundwater Monitoring D~ta and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, Washington
. ,
.' . . -
;~~GJJ>!/i:J);.\tE; . ..
tQe~:::' ..~~j.:: :~::)? '.: :" ,::/,~:::';::': ~ :~: ,:::::.- :-' :.:...:,::.:'", .
. ."
....:\~)::?:;:::::~~fP:i:;:/::::t;::I:it~~}::m:::;::]::::::rrriHg:::mm::::c'
"f; it; . 61 :...
MW-16
(cont)
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
17.00
11.40
16.60
91.03
96.62***
91.45**
0.00 140,00020 <5,00p20 970 <0.50
0.06 NOT SAMPLED DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF SPH
0.02 NOT SAMPLED DUEiTO THE PRESENCE OF SPH
<0.50
0.59
1.9
MW-17
108.97 09/20/93 19.38 89.59 280 NO NO NO NO NO NO 16
12/23/93 17.92 91.05 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
03/25/94 21.12 87.85 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
05/04/94 20.33 88.64 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
09/28/94: 22.96 86.01 NO ND NO NO NO NO NO NO
!
12/09/94 18.34 90.63 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
!
03/15195 18.87 90.10 NO NE> NO NO NO NO NO
06/22/95 21.84 87.13 NO 910 NO NO NO NO NO
09111/95 21.90 87.07 NO ND NO NO NO NO NO
12/06/95 20.00 88.97 NO NI;> NO NO NO . NO NO
03/14/96 18.73 90.24 NO NO l'IO NO NO NO NO
06/05196
09104196 20.80 88.17
12/23/96
04115/97 '-
09/15/97
!
12/29/97 ....
03/18/98 i
,
06/23/98 24.77 84.20 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
08/31199
-,.
03/17-18/00 18.53 90.44 0.00
'T
10/06/00
i
04/01/01 19.49 89.48 0.00
,
09/27/01 17.01 91.96 0.00
03/28/02 19.25 89.72 0.00 ,
.,..
100135I.xls/#386607 14
, As of 09/1 0/03
. .
..t)ATE.....<
Tabl~ 1
Groundwater Monitoring Data and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 High1an~ Avenue
Bremerton,Washington
>O.Ltad\
...b....:.:.......:
MW -17
(cont)
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
22.96
20.86
22.82
86.01
88.11
86.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
MW-18
104.88 09/20/93 11.67 93.21 3.0 NO NO NO NO NO 1.2 46
12123/93 8.38 96.50 8,300 1,700 1,300 6.3 1.3 4.3 3.8 NO
i 4.2 . 1.0 4.1 6.4 NO
03/25/94 5.91 98.97 4,600 NO 760
05/04/94 8.15 96.73 9,500 NO 1,100 NO 0.9 2.2 2.6 NO
09/28/94 12.18 92.70 3,500 760 460 NO 1.1 1.2 1.4 NO
12109/94 10.15 94.73 31,000 NI> NO NO NO NO NO NO
03/15/95 5.02 99.86 2,800 1,lqO 1,300 3.0 1.3 2.3 2.9
06/22/95 9.92 94.96 15,000 1,500 870 0.57 NO 0.56 2.0
09/11/95 11.60 93.28 5,500 2,700 1,200 NO 0.58 NO 3.3
12106/95 7.00 97.88 3,400 ND 1,800 0.96 0.72 1.2 3.0
03/14/96 6.55 98.33 Sheen 4,600 790 11,000 NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
06/05/96 7.70 97.18
i
09/04/96 10.85 94.03 I
12/23/96 10.85 94.03 ..;.
04/15/97 7.48 97.40
09/15/97 11.10 93.78 14,800 1,3~0 641 NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
12/29/97
03/18/98
06/23/98 10.18 94.70 Sheen --
03/24/99 . 5.89 98.99 0.00 2,490 NO 647 0.943 NO 0.792 4.21
08/31/99 19.59 85.29 0.00 NO Np NO NO NO NO NO
03/17-18/00 6.54 98.34 Sheen 3,000 ~O 999 NOlO NOlO NO NOlO
1 0/06/00 12.07 92.81 0.00 1,85017 53~14 462 NO 0.601 0.727 1.42
04/0 I/O 1 8.46 96.42 0.00 121,000 <30~800 1,390 0.791 <0.500 0.806 3.90
09/27/01 12.29 92.59 0.00 5,610 856 494 1.06 <1.00 <1.00 3.08
03/28/02 8.60 96.28 0.00 68,00020 <10,00020 1,300 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 5.3
1001351.xlsI#386607 1~ As of 09/10/03
- ..... . . . ... . . . . . '. .. -. .. .... ... . . . .. .
+12fl;r(?~~T~p..:.~!:WlJf)\\bwt:
.. .Ul.~ ~
Groundwater Monitoring Da~a and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton,V{ ashington
... . ... ...
. H__ .' .' ..
..,.....:{....))...:Ltad:.:..:..
.-1j::.,.........
MW-18
(cont)
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
12.42
10.52
11.91
92.46
94.36
92.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
28,00020
80,00020
32,00020
<5,00020
<lO,oqifO
<5 20020
,
730
810
760
<;0.50
<1.0
<0.5
<0.50
<1.0
<0.5
<0.50
<0.50
<0.5
<1.5
<1.5
<3.0
MW-19
107.39 09/20/93 15.73 91.66 4,900 1,2QO 400 4.1 1.0 1.3 3.1 NO
12/23/93 -10.31 97.08 6,700 1,7QO 1,600 25 3.8 9.7 10 NO
03/25/94
05/04/94 10.95 96.44 45,000 ND 3,500 41 3.7 19 9.8 4.9
09/28/94 ,
12/09/94 8.69 98.70 16,000 NDIO 2,800 12 1.9 6.7 7.0 NOlO
03/15/95 ..l
06/22/95 13.53 93.86 12,000 1,4~0 3,800 17 2.6 8.7 8.7
09/11/95 15.73 I
91.66
12/06/95 6.00 10 1.39 3,300 810 1,900 8.2 1.1 3.6 3.3
03/14/96 7.13 100.26 ..;.
06/05/96 11.15 96.24 4,350 NO 1,700 12.5 1.58 6.75 4.40
09/04/96 15.45 91.94 !
12/23/96 7.85 99.54
i
04/15/97
'-
09/15/97 15.35 92.04 8,510 1,280 3,260 3.51 2.12 2.54 5.74
12/29/97 8.23 I
99.16 -
03/18/98 7.50 99.89 2,580 NOlO 1,250 NDIO NOlO NOlO NOlO
06/23/98 13.90 93.49 Sheen
03/24/99 6.49 ,
100.90 0.00 2,010 ~O 780 NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
08/31/99 I
03/17-18/00 6.41 j-
100.98 0.00 -
10/06/00 -
04/01/01 8.80 98.59 0.00
,--
09/27/01 16.12 91.27 0.00
03/28/02 8.05 99.34 0.00
.-
1001351.1\15/#386607 ~6
As of 09/10/03
.. ,............ . .
VVltLLIl)'.. ..... ...>DA.t~................t>!M'~ H.
TOC*(ft.Y\<...... ........... ....................i... j
I
i
Tabl~ 1
Groundwater Monitoring Da.ta and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton,Washington
!
MW-19
( cont)
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
15.76
13.87
19.01
91.63
93.52
88.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
MW-20
97.25 09120/93 8.86 88.47** 0.10 ,
12/23/93 7.91 89.34 590 76~ NO NO NO NO NO NO
03/25/94 5.85 91.40 740 ND NO NO NO NO NO NO
05/04/94 7.22 90.03 1,900 1,990 NO NO NO NO NO NO
09128/94 9.29 87.96 780 910 NO NO 1.5 NO NO NO
12/09/94 6.63 90.62 490 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
03/15/95 4.32 92.93 580 NO 66 NO NO NO NO
06/22/95 8.14 89.11 700 NO NO NO NO NO NO
I
09111195 8.87 88.38 1,300 1,900 84 NO NO NO NO
12/07/95 5.27 91.98 NO NO 83 , NO NO NO NO
i
03/14/96 6.32 90.93 440 NO 66 NO NO NO NO
06/05/96 !
7.30 89.95 636 NO 752 NO NO NO NO
09/04/96 8.85 88.40 557 763 76.2 NO NO NO NO
12/23/96 5.82 91.43 1,140 865 63.1 NO NO NO NO
04/15/97 6.40 90.85 385 NO 56.8 NO NO NO NO
09/15/97 8.55 88.70 412 NP 178 NO NO NO NO
12/29/97 5.82 91.43 614 NO 56.7 NO NO NO NO
03/18/98 5.80 91.45 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
06/23/98 8.12 89.13 269 NO 58.1 NO NO NO NO
03/24/99 5.28 91.97 0.00 318 ~O NO 0.581 NO NO NO
08/31/99 ,
I
03/17-18/00 I
5.61 91.64 0.00 i
10/06/00 i
04/01101 6.68 90.57 0.00
09/27/01 7.93 89.32 0.00
03/28/02 6.34 90.91 0.00
1001351.xls/#386607 17 As of 09/10/03
w&j,;t!ri?i.:(:p'~~~:....:: .......:. " '.: ..: ....... ....... . .
rioc~(k.:: :i:::i(\\'"
1 ame 1
i
Groundwater Monitoring Data and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton,Washington
'::::::.i:':!:::..;:.:.:::-.~~~~::":::::::'."':::;:::::%~I',:':':::::::::::'::.::~r~~:!;i!l!.!:!:ii:ii
MW-20
( cont)
09130102
03107103
09110103
8.52
7.17
7.61
88.73
90.08
89.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
-,
MW-21
97.27 09120193 9.10 88.17 2,200 Nd10 45,000 470 8,300 890 6,500 49
12/23/93 8.11 89.16 3,000 930 12,000 120 2,200 410 2,400 32
03/25/94 7.92 89.35 2,800 NUIO 12,000 89 1,400 450 1,900 11
05/04194 8.72 88.55 4,900 940 20,000 150 4,200 480 3,800 14
09/28/94 9.73 87.54 2,600 NP 52,000 170 4,500 1,600 6,800 12
12/09194 8.08 89.19 1,700 NqlO 40,000 120 2,100 910 3,800 13
03/15195 6.50 90.77 1,000 NO 19,000 71 1,400 670 2,800
06122195 9.16 88.11 4,100 8~0 35,000 130 4,600 740 4,100
09/11/95 9.25 88.02 3,600 II,QOO 40,000 92 3,100 1,200 5,800
12/07/95 7.27 90.00 1,200 ND 960 2.3 50 30 150
i
03/14/96 8.36 88.91 2,800 Np 25,000 110 1,200 1,600 4,000
06/05/96 8.83 88.44 3,580 NalO 47,400 NOlO 3,700 2,160 8,780
09/04/96 9.25 ,88.02 3,460 8i5 42,500 71.6 2,570 1,780 7,780
12/23/96 7.64 89.63 2,250 887 31,900 59.7 1,500 1,300 5,230
04/15/97 8.40 88.87 404 No 4,870 12.1 231 207 649 '-
i
09/15/97 9.10 88.17 1,800 NDIO 65,300 NDIO 2,130 2,160 10,200
12/29/97 7.69 89.58 4,960 859 31,600 59 992 1,190 4,760
03/18198 8.00 89.27 275 'N.O 2,410 20.3 10.4 30.3 66.9
06/23/98 9.10 88.17 756 NO 31,000 63.2 1,150 1,390 5,990
I
03124199 7.16 90.11 0.00 774 NO 34,600 46.0 600 1,680 3,820
i
08/31199 9.29 87.98 0.00 547 NO 31,000 NOlO 748 1,260 4,920
03/17-18/00 7.88 89.39 0.00 732 NOlO 24,200 47.5 503 1,530 4,500
10/06/00 9.84 87.43 0.00 1,15018 ~O 34,800 56.5 588 1,500 6,050
04/01/01 8.41 88.86 0.00 2,870 <750 41,100 191 633 1,890 7,570
09/27/01 9.49 87.78 0.00 6,560 i
4,00 36,100 91.4 494 1,890 7,430
03128/02 8.30 88.97 0.00 70020 <75020 5,200 5.3 130 360 970
1001351.xls/#386607 ~8 As of 09/1 0/03
'. , . . -. - ..
DATE \ ..>> D!\yl:t) >
iF,i<
Tabl~ 1 .
Groundwater Monitoring n"ta and Analytical Results
Fonner Chevron Bulk Terminal # 1 001351
131 0 Highl~d Avenue
Bremerton,Washington
MW-21
( cont)
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
9.09
8.45
8.84
88.18
88.82
88.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,20020
97020
60010
28020
<25020
<25010
34,000
6,500
9,000
<50
<20
14
360
110
82
1,500
530
370
6,200
600
1,100
MW-22
96.47 09120/93 8.04 88.43 95,000 .15,000 450 24 1.3 2.6 3.4 30
12/23/93 7.38 89.09 14,000 NO 5,100 20 NO NO 9.7 NO
03/25/94 7.98 88.49 91,000 8,OpO 410 15 3.6 14 11 NO
05/04/94 8.49 87.98 55,000 NO 2,500 3.0 NO 3.0 5.3 NO
09/28/94 9.48 86.99 9,500 NO 280 0.5 1.3 1.2 1.3 NO
12/09/94 8.11 88.36 43,000 NqlO 210, NOlO 0.7 NOlO 0.8 NOlO
03/15/95 6.67 89.80 2,200 770 220 1.2 NO 11 2.0
06/22/95 8.99 87.48 4,500 I,~OO 430 NO 1.4 NO 1.6
09/11/95 8.59 87.88 9,300 4,~00 570 1.1 1.8 NO 2.6
12107/95 7.12 89.35 3,100 NO 350 NO NO NO NO
03114/96 7.25 89.22 4,700 780 670 NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
i
06/05/96 8.40 88.07 8,850 998 535 0.559 NO NO NO
09/04/96 8.35 88.12 15,600 2'140 1,450 NO NO NO NO
12/23/96 7.00 89.47 19,100 2,790 1,350 NO NO NO NO
04/15/97 7.95 88.52 2,040 NO 63.8 0.876 NO NO NO
09/15/97 8.50 87.97 2,200 NO 774 5.02 NO NO NO
12/29/97 7.00 89.47 2,180 ~O 202 1.47 NO NO NO
03118/98 7.97 88.50 870 ~O 84.7 NO NO NO NO
06/23/98 8.75 87.72 1,010 ~O 133 2.59 NO NO 1.20
03/24/99 6.12 90.35 0.00 1,150 NO 187 6.33 3.20 4.77 8.66
08/31/99 8.26 88.21 0.00 966 NO 57.2 1.53 NO NO NOlO
03/17-18/00 i NOlO
7.49 88.98 0.00 797 NO 144 NO NO NOlO
1 0/06/00 1,11014 ,
9.50 86.97 0.00 NO 216 0.619 1.09 0.611 2.36
04/01/01 7.50 88.97 0.00
i
09/27/01 8.96 87.51 0.00 ,
--
03/28/02 8.05 88.42 0.00 5,60020 <1,10020 250 1.3 <0.50 <0.50 1.8
1001351.)(15/#386607 19 As of 09/1 0/03
DATii:
1 aDl~ 1
Groundwater Monitoring Data and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk [erminal #1001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, Washington
I
:::smxf:::::: :::ttp:HJjf::,{::::;::;twoH:'(
"Jj ::
:.' ;': <I>/L~.d' ::.;
b<:':':"';
MW-22
(cont)
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
8.23
8.18
8.58
88.24
88.29
87.89
0.00 SAMPLED ANNUALLY
0.00 1,50020 . 50lfo
0.00 SAMPLED ANNUALLY
100
0.89
<1.0
<0.50
<1.5
MW-23
108.07 09/20/937 18.22 89.85 4,300 97P 900 20 2.6 4.0 2.8 NO
12123f93 17.11 . 90.96 3,700 1,2pO 370 8.6 1.9 0.9 3.9 NO
03/2Sf94 20.39 87.68 4,300 880 880 14 2.3 3.0 3.5 NO
I 1.3 NO
05/04f94 19.31 88.76 3,900 NO 1,000 12 1.9 2.1
l 1.0 4.2
09/28/94 21.54 86.53 2,500 NO 750 7.7 1.5 1.1
12/09/94 17.25 90.82 3,400 NO 430 5.7 1.5 1.0 1.2 NO
03/15/95 19.32 88.75' 4,100 1,600 1,700 14 2.6 3.4 4.5
06/22/95 20.77 87.30 5,100 2,1;00 850 7.8 1.4 1.1 2.4
09/11/95 22.37 85.70 8,300 5,7,00 NO 0.57 NO NO NO
12/06/95 18.95 89.12 2,100 N;O NO NO NO NO NO
03/14/96 14.15 93.92 2,600 1,1,00 970 5.7 0.63 0.70 1.4
06/05/96 20.45 87.62
09/04/96 18.80 89.27 "-
12/23/96 17.81 90.26 5,660 2,$00 378 2.23 0.626 NO 1.19
04/15/97 18.55 89.52 2,910 914 1,260 9.22 1.50 1.61 3.15 '..
09/15/97 22.20 85.87 2,330 1,110 462 NO NO NO NO
12/29/97 19.15 88.92 2,710 8~0 155 0.728 NO NO NO
03/18/98 21.60 86.47 2,570 NDIO 1,460 NOlO NOlO NOlO NOlO
06/23/98 23.68 84.39 2,370 NO 784 2.02 0.774 NO 2.21
03/24/99 . 15.65 92.42 0.00 2,150 NO 553 2.16 1.08 2.04 4.93
08/31/99 18.88 89.19 0.00 1,220 ND 264 NOlO ND NOlO NOlO
03/17-18/00 16.90 91.17 0.00 2,070 ~O 1,240 1.57 NOlO NOlO NOlO
10/06/00 19.84 88.23 0.00 7,97014 256014 919 0.926 1.57 1.39 3.38
'r
04/01/01 20.40 87.67 0.00 1,400 <'150 146 0.769 <0.500 <0.500 . <1.00
09/27/01 17.76 90.31 0.00 5,050 1,040 1,030 10.2 1.74 4.22 13.1
03/28/02 17.49 90.58 0.00 2,50020 <75020 1,100 <1.0 <1.0 1.7 <3.0
1001351.xls/#386607 20 As of 09/1 0103
i
~Lt ii;){H .DATJt</
T}:l(j.VJi.) ...
TablJ 1
Groundwater Monitoring Da,ta and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal # I 00 1351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, 'Yashington
MW-23
(cant)
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
19.03
21.33
23.33
89.04
86.74
84.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,30020
27020
53010
1,00020
<25020
<25~10
190
<50
<50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.5
<0.50
<0.50
<0.5
<0.50
<0.50
<0.5
<1.5
<1.5
<1.5
MW-24
100.65 09/20/937 10.53 90.12 340 ND ND 0.6 ND ND ND 5.0
12/23/93 9.61 91.04 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
03/25/94 -- I
05/04/94 11.32 89.33 ND NJ? ND ND ND ND ND ND
09/28/94 --
12/09/94 9.99 90.66 310 NID ND ND ND NO NO NO
03/15/95
06/22/95 12.96 87.69 2,000 NID ND ND ND ND NO
09/11/95
12/06/95 10.68 89.97 ND NO ND NO ND NO ND
03/14/96 10.25 90.40 ND Np ND ND ND ND NO
06/05/96 12.20 88.45 --
09/04/96 11.75 88.90
12/23/96 10.60 90.05 --
04/15/97 10.60 90.05
09/15/97 14.34 86.31 504 ND 94.7 NO NO NO ND
12/29/97 9.95 90.70
03/18/98 12.65 88.00
06/23/98 15.15 85.50 NO ND ND ND ND NO ND
03/24/99. 8.11 92.54 0.00 267 ND ND ND ND ND NO
08/31199 ,
--
03/17-18/00 9.92 90.73 0.00 I
10/06/00 --
04/0 1/01 13.91 86.74 0.00
09/27/01 11.67 88.98 0.00
03/28/02 11.04 89.61 0.00
1 nn1 '1'; lxl~/#3R6607 21 As of 09/10/03
.l ilUlt: .l
I
Groundwater Monitoring D~ta and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk iI'erminal #1001351
131 0 Higbl~d Avenue
Bremerton, Vi ashington
DA1'lt<<.. .....
... . . . . -".
... -. - ..... ...-..
. P' . ..... _.........
. ... . . .. -... - . ..
. . ........
,- .-.....-. .. . . "'" ..
,_. .. .. ','" .
.. ... . - .... . .
. . -. - . . . . . .
. ..,-," -.
. . . . . - . .... . .
MW-24
( cont)
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
12.99
11.03
12.43
87.66
89.62
88.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
Trip Blank
TB-LB 06/23/98 ND ND ND ND ND
03/24/99 -- ND ND ND ND ND
08/31199 ND ND ND ND ND
i ND10 ND10 ND10
03/17-18/00 113 ND
10/06/00 ND ND ND ND ND
04/01101 -- <50.0 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00
09/27/01 ~ <100 <0.500 <1.00 <1.00 <1.50
03/28/02 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5
QA 09/30/02 -- <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5
03/07/03 <50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5
09/10/03 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
TPH-D TPH-O TPH-G B T E X D. Lead
Standard Laboratory Reporting Limits.: 250 250 50 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 - ~
MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels: . 500 500 800/1,000 5 1,000 700 1,000 15 -
Current Method: NWTPH-D + Extended NWfPH-G and EPA 80218 EPA 7421
IOOI351.xIs/#386607
2~
As of 09/10/03
Table 1
Groundwater Monitoring Data and Analytical Results
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal # I 00 1351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, Washington
EXPLANA nONS:
Groundwater monitoring data and laboratory analytical results prior to March 24, 1999, were comp/led from reports prepared by Pacific Environmental Group, Inc.
TOC in feet relative to an arbitrary datum.
GWE has been corrected for the presence ofSPH; correction factor: [(TOC - DTW) + (SPIn; x 0.80)].
GWE has been corrected for the presence ofSPH; correction factor: [(TOC - DTP - SPHT) +: (SPHT x 0.80)]; Historical data has been altered
to correct error in original reporting of depth to product as depth to water.
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) Modified EP A Method 8015 was detected at 46,400 ppb.
TPH Modified EP A Method 8015 was detected at 36,700 ppb.
TPH Modified EPA Method 8015 was detected at 76,700 ppb.
TPH Modified EPA Method 8015 was detected at 1,742,000 ppb.
TPH Modified EPA Method 8015 was detected at 38,900 ppb.
TPH Modified EP A Method 8015 was detected at 150,000 ppb.
TPH Modified EPA Method 8015 was ND.
Well obstructed at approximately 5.2 feet.
Well obstructed at approximately 4.5 feet.
Detection limit mised. Refer to analytical reports.
Laboratory report indicates sample appears to contain extractable diesel range organics.
Absorbent sock installed in well.
Replaced absorbent sock.
Laboratory report indicates detected hydrocarbons have non-petroleum peaks or elution pattern that suggests the presence of biogenic interference.
Laboratory report indicates detected hydrocarbons in the heavy/oil mnge appear to be due t6 overlap of diesel mnge hydrocarbons.
Laboratory report indicates detected hydrocarbons appear to be due to biogenic interference; as well as weathered diesel; cleanup recommended.
Laboratory report indicates hydrocarbon pattern and mnge have non-p'etrOleum peaks or elu~on pattern that suggests the presence of biogenic interference,
however, there. is some heavily weathered diesel. !
Laboratory report indicates detected hydrocarbons are mainly due to overlap from the gasoline range; however, there is some weathered diesel detected.
Absorbent sock present.
TPH-D and TPH-O with silica gel cleanup.
TOC = Top of Casing
(ft.) = Feet
DTW/P = Depth to Water or Product
GWE = Groundwater Elevation
SPHT = Separate Phase Hydrocarbon Thickness
TPH-D = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel
TPH-O = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Oil
*
**
***
4
9
10
II
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
1001351.xls/#386607
TPH-G = Total Petroleum Hydrocar~ons as Gasoline
B = Benzene
T = Toluene
E = Ethylbenzene
X = Xylenes
(ppb) = Parts per billion
ND = Not Detected
-- = Not MeasuredfNot Analyzed
D. Lead = Dissolved Lead - Analysis by EPA Method 7421
QA = Quality AssumncefTrip Blank
MTCA = Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulations
[WAC 1 73-340-720(2)(a)(I), as amended 02/0 I]
~3
As of 09/1 0/03
Table 2
Separate Phase Hydrocarbon ThicknesslRemoval Data
Former Chevron Bulk Terminal # 1 00 1351 .'
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, Washington
H . .' . . . .. ..
'. . ......, . ,'. "
. . .. . . . . , . . . . . .' .
... ....\........~Aft.<)n ........ .......p ..D'f:t}<:.
.... .. l!t.) .'.: ..:.....:.: :.. .. . . .
. P ... . . spa . .. . ..AM~y~~~^I~~p
>l'~lt~~::?;..(~rllf"'~!tiR)...
.. .. . )</\+:. . :... ..... li aIIOJ",) > >
MW-14
03/28/02
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
6.80
9.35
7.58
9.35
6.83
9.38
7.60
9.37
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MW-15
09/30/02
03/07/03
09/10/03
8.84
7.19
8.87
7.22
8.96
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MW-16
03/07/03
09/10/03
11.40
16.58
11.46
16.60
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.00
EXPLANATIONS:
DTP = Depth to Product
_m_--DTW = Depthfo Watti
(ft.) = Feet
SPH = Separate Phase Hydrocarbons
Note: Historical data has been altered to correct error in original reporting of depth to product as depth to water.
ATTACHMENT - 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_____1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ 4'
4
Su pplementalEnvironm ental
Site Assessment
Decommissioned Chevron Bulk Terminal
No., 61001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, Washington
_ _P!~2~_~forH
Chevron U.S.A Products Company
March 10, 1994
Prepared by
Pacific Environmental Group, Inc.
4020 148th Avenue NE, Suite B
Redmond, Washington 98052
Project 520-041.01
PACIFIC
ENVIRONMENTAL
, GROUF? INC.
.. .... _ _' _' _ ...... __ _, ~. 8lIIIIII!IL' .... -- ~. ~ ...... ~.. -.-
,
, PARAMETER
. TPH- TPH- TPH- Ethyl- Total
Sample I.D. Date Gasoline Die~c1. Oil Benzene Toluene benzene Xylenes Lead
'~_~~~oWir~~j&~~~~~~~W'~X1';W~~~1ct~.m?
MW-23 (35') 9/13/93 NO NO NP NO NO NO NO 2.8
.
MW-2J (42') 9/14/93 NO 38 74 NO NO ND NO 5.7
, , !
MW-24 (21.5') 9/13/93 NO 44 2io 0.l2 ND ND 0.041 \ 14
!
, I
,
MW-24 (34') 9/14/93 NO 42 120 NO ND NO NO 4.3
MTCA Method A i
:
Clcnnun Lc"cl: - 100.0 200.0 2~Q.0 0.5 40.0 20.0 20.0 250.0
, 0.027 - 0.027 - 0.027 - 0.027 -
.
Relwrting Limit: - 5-7 10 - 13 401.49 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033 1.5 - 6.2
TABLE :1
SOIL ANA~YTlCA~ RESULTS
DECOMMISSIONED CHEVRON BULK TERMINAL 61001351
TPH as Gasoline-Method WfPH-G
TPH as Diesel and Oil~Melhdd WfPH-O+exlended
BTEX ComDounds-Melhod 8020
TC!tal Lead~Melhod 1420
Concentrations in ~glkg (ppm)
!
NOTES: NO - Not Detected
3/8/94
..
.. ..
---...---------
TABLE 3 :
SOIL ANALYTICAL J;UtSUL TS
DECOMMISSIONED CHEVRON BULK TE~INAL i# 610U1351
Polynuclear Aromatic ~vdrocarbons (PA!ls) - EPA MeU\od 831Q
Concentrations in mglkg (ppm)
PARAMETER
. 1-Methyl- 2-Methyli' Phenan- Fluor-
Sample I.D. Date Nallthalene nallthalene nallthalene Fluorene threne Anthracene anthene pyrene
:mMilim~!iW$$~mw.~~;~~.~~~~~~~~~~l1.~~~~~~
. '
i
MW-23 (35') 9/13/93 NO . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
NO
0.083-
0.11 .
NOTES: NO - Not Detected
Detected concentrations ofPAHs are non-carcillogenic PAlls only.
See CARs for reporting limits for MW-22 (lq') and for PAlls analyzed for not shown on this table.
The MfCA Method A cleanup level for total: carcinogenic P A!ls is 1 ppm. .
Certified Analytical Results are attached
MW-23 (42')
9/14/93
NO
NO
NO.
NO
NO
MW-24 (21.5')
9/13/93.
NO
NO '
NO
NO
NO
MW-24 (34')
RCIJorting Limits:
9/14/93
NO
0.17-
0.22
NO
0.17- :
0.22 !
NO
0.017-
0.022
NO
U.0083-
'0.011
NO
NO
'NO
NO
NO
0.0083-
0.011
NO
O.U17-
0.022
NO
NO
NO
0.017-
0.022
-
'.
3/3/94
N
I
I
I
I
I
.
......
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
CONSTUCTED IN FIRST
WATER-BEARING UNIT LOCATION
AND DESIGNATION
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
CONSTRUCTEDDEEPER IN
WATER-BEARING'UNIT LOCATION
AND DESIGNATION
MW-12 J2J ABANDONED GROUNDWATER
MONITORING WELL LOCATION AND
DESIGNATION
PORT WASHINGTON NARROWS
WOODEN BULKHEAD (BURIED)
VAPOR EXTRACTION EQUIPMENT
r FORMER WAREHOUSE
LOCATION
WOODEN BULKHEAD
MW-8
(DRY)@
MW-13 @)
I .
(8S.98)
,.
MW-5 MW-6
(DRY) @) (88.41)@
1 If
ASPHALT J
MW-4 ~
(SS.36),
I
MW-14J
S8.73)
tlttr~~~~(!~i!IiI~~~~ :
;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;: : ::::::::::::::;:::. J
f li> MW-1~
J (S8.24)
@) MW-9 J .
(S8.35) J
I
I
I
9,
'""'
~C::~M
..
l
FORMER ABOVE GROUND
TANKS (TYP)
MW-4 @)
STORAGE
CONTAINER
<.0
~
MW-17 +
@)
MW-21 LOWER
(S8.17) YARD
UPPER
YARD
MW-17-
+
LEGEND
(8S.36) GROUNDWATER ELVATION IN FEET,
PROJECT DATUM, 9-20-93
(NA) WELL INACCESSIBLE, 9-20-93
GROUNDWATERELEVATION IN FEET,
PROJECT DATUM, 9-20-93
MW-17- DUE TO SCREENING PLACEMENT,
THESE WELLS WERE NOT USED
FOR CONTOURING
MW-20
(S8.39)
FORMER GARAGE
CONCRETE
BULKHEAD
(BURIED)
HIGHLAND AVENUE
V:::::::::::::::::::::I AREAS OF CONCRETE PADS
&
PACIFiC '
ENVIRONMENTAL
GROUP, INC.
DECOMMISSIONED CHEVRON SULK TERMINAL 61001351
1310 Highland Avenue
Bremerton, Washington
SCALE
I
40
I
o
I
80 FEET
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR MAP - SHALLOW WATER BEARING UNIT
SURVEY BENCHMARK LOCATION,
ARBITRARY ELEVATION = 100.00 FEET
FIGURE:
3
PROJECT:
520-41 .01
b (Q(::)( ,3:s I
REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION STUDY
CHEVRON BULK FUEL TERMINAL
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
FOR CHEVRON, U.S.A.
FILE NO. 0372-34-4
_'H~r
"11
1\
~~!li
[~~
r...~l
[~
~(!~
~
;.~ ~
.~,
~~ 0
~4 TI\BLE 1 I.J
~
I ~Y OF: SOIL ANALYTICAL QIEMIsrRY IM'A tr1
tU!i :::l
~!~ , cs.
:Sfl
:~ t:l
Diesel Ethy1- Total (1)
Bi;! ('t)
~.:~~ Gasoline 41=1 , 41=2 Benzene Toluene benZene Xy1enes ~
t~1
t~ij Location ( PP1l) (ppn) (ppll) (ppb) (ppb) (POO) ( ppb)
I
l'!'~ .
~~ B-3 66 <10 <10
~
~tl;. MW-4 630 <10 100 <10 15,000 3,100 12,400
ilf. I
(~
~~ ffi-5 4,300 17,000 <10 3,4~0 9,400 2,600 6,800
~~~
"'I
Ii@. MW-6 230 .71 <10 <10 8,700 2,300 10,500
,. ';:~
MW-7 <1 <10 <10 <10 27 66 <10
ffi-8 900 <10 200 <10 39,000 110,000 37,000
\J1 ffi-9
<1 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 29
MW-I0 <1 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
i
MW-11 3. <10 480 <10 <10 <10 <10
MW-12 220 <10 i 210 <10 <10 <10 520
TP-l ' 250 <10 1,400 <10 <10 169 15
TP-Z 31 <10 74 <10 <10 201 15
TP-3 81 <10 i 250 <10 <10 88 680
,
TP-4 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1
TP-5 <1 <10 ! <10 <1 <1 <1 <1
TP-6 4 <10 ! 82 <10 <10 <10 41
TP-7 280 <10 47 <10 6,100 2,400 2,300
'1
Shoreline~~...
.., ______ B-~ B-2"\, -- ---..._
Fence ~ ____i-Y-+-.Jr~ x__
~~ B-3.;..,'--;:;0 ~ =---- - -
~ MW-1
MW-8.
(88.32)
\
*
\
I
MW-5.
(89.82)
.MW-6
(89.86)
MW-4 .
(89.93)
6"l
Terminal Area
(Lower Yard)
/ MW-10
MW-9. (90.40-
/(90.19)
10
TP-~
<:()
o
,
...
,
Q
.....
~
~
)
j
'l--
.
~
()
.
N
1'-..
:)
::l
-~~-
Port Washington Narrows
...-----... .
70 ---...____...
)~ __ 1< )~ H )(,,-- -
MW-20
D
MW-11.
(91. 27)
I
I~?I
/ MW-120
I (91. 26)
TP-3-$-
I
I
TP-~
TP-2 -$-
Former Fuel Tank Area
(Upper Yard)
TP-6 -$-
TP-~
-- )t '"
Highland Avenue
REFERENCE: DRAWING ENTITLED "GROUND PLAN", DATED 10/16/70 REVISED, BY
STAND~RD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA.
YW.,
EXPLANATION:
B-1A
." BORING LOCATION
AND NUMBER
MW-4. MONITOR WELL LOCATION
AND NUMBER
TP-1~ BACKHOE PIT LOCATION
AND NUMBER
TP-5-$-
. ,
.:t'
J(
~N
o
t
40
I
80
I
SCALE IN FEET
(89.92) RELATIVE GROUND WATER
ELEVATION ON 10/12/88
o GROUND WATER FLOW 01 RECTION
MW-10 MONITOR WELL INSTALLED
JULY, 1976 BY GEOENGINEERS
~91 WATER TABLE ELEVATION CONTOURS
BASED ON 10/12/88 MEASUREMENTS
,J'
:.s
~
<f
'"
-~I".
Geo qgJEngineers
SITe PLAN
FIGURE 2
ATTACHMENT - 4
53
..
..
HNrrCnowsBl
Earth and Environmental Technologies
FACrlrTY NII~.yp.~ _ {{y(} l?:b1
GE:CG.'LC:=-:::l 0
SERVIC: i--....J.!,~~;?03AlS IJ
PERri.; Ie. -'-. --; J 0
DRAWfNGS/P; :,;702/i\lOTES 0
SPILL & u::;'.:~ r._PO?iTS 0
LEGAUEAsEMENTSJUC. Q.
,REPoRTs JfJ,
Status Report
Interim Remedial Action
Vapor Extraction System
Chevron Former Bulk Terminal
Bremerton, Washington
Prepared-'or
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
December 16, 1991
J-2365-01
Seattle . Tacoma . Rich/and . Anchorage . Portland . San Franc/sco . Long BeaJ:h
~ ~
Table 1 - Summary of Analytical Results for Soil Samples
Hart Crowser
J-2365-o1
EP A Method 8020 EPA Method 8015 mod.
Depth Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon~
Sample ID in Feet Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylenes as gasoline as diesel
Concentration in mg/kg
EX -:2 7.5 to 9 NO 21 ~ 23 130 3800 ND
EX-3 7.5 to 9 0.16 1.6 1.6 11 250 310
EX-4 7.5 to 9 NO 38 33 190 3200 2200
EX-5 7.5 to 9 NO 28 17 180 660 1100
EX-6 7.5 to 9 1.4 NO 3.2 8.1 125 790
EX-7 7.5 to 9 NO 3.6 1 0.31 1 14 ] 600 530
EX-g 7.5 to 9 NO 28 J 16 ] 140 ] 540 935
EX-9 7.5 to 9 51 200 570 1000 9663 NO
EX -10 6.5 to 8 NO 59 6.2 140 2400 9100
EX-ll 7 to 8.5 0.65 39 14 210 7200 NO
ND - not detected above the. laboratory detection limit, see attached Laboratory Certificates for specific limits
1 - Estimated value; QA/QC review of laboratory data revealed problems in analysis, See Appendix B for explanation.
Sample locations are shown on Figures 2 and 3.
Chemical analysis was performed by Analytical Technologies, Inc., in Renton, Washington.
DUOIT1lJOas
.;~
.1 .
Hart Crowser
1-2365-01
Table 2 - Summary of Vapor Extraction System Monitoring Parameters
Date of Calculated Emissions in Pounds/day++ Percent LEL+ Percent Oxygen+
Measurement ' SP-l SP-2 VP-l SPl & SP2 SP-l SP-2 VP-I SP-3 SP-l SP-2 VP-I
11/07/90 365 3730 4095 43
11/09/90 1580 10536 12116
11/16/90 . 492 3802 4294 27
11/27/90 143 105 248 31
12/20/90 18 117 135 2
12/27/90 0 265 265 22
03/02/91 1 23 24 5 1 1 19.7 18.5 19.6
03130/91 33 1217 1250 3 15 5 5 20.3 19.7 20.2
05/01/91 99 151 127 250 2 24 8 8 2O.S 18.3 20.S
06/24/91 23 1024 960 1047 1 29 7 7 19.8 16.7 18.9
07123/91 6 58 9 64 1 27 8 8 20.4 16.4 19.1
08/23/91 6 33 20 39 1 4 2 2 22.3. 20.6. 21.4.
. MSA 361 not calibrated properly for oxygen measurements.
+ Measurements made using a MSA 361 combustablc gas monitor.,
++ Samples collected using a charcOllI collection tube (Appendix A) and analyzed using NIOSH Method 1500 (OCIFID).
236j01T31JOBS
Vapor Extraction System Plan
l' or."'
;.~x~
If';'~ -1"..........
;.~ ..........-t~ThermaIOxidl...r
...---- 3.
;. .EX-10
------ f
'1-~ 2e .
;.~ r Lateral 1 !
( .ell.....L.................J
..... t. =
,. .... =
\ ..... EX-4 o. :t.
MW-8~. .EX-1
>'-.".
\ .EX-5
>'- 7. ~
\ Lateral 2 \ ......l...........::~.~:;...............
EX-8.)(o.....~..... .t =
13. .EX-3 :
>'-\ n. i
EX-2i
\ ... ~ Yom
\ ""~13/' , 'h ~EX-9
.,.:. ..................;.. .
.
:I
.EX-6
\
Lx--X
totl
st\\tlG
'fJf>-.
O\f'J5
tlf'.r.r.
8.
20.
~A~ ""-
HIGH ..,.,
LA.No AlleNuE "---- x
s.
L1A
J
~MW-5
.
.
.
i L1
I
!;..w-f
:t SP-1
EX-11.
23.
10.
SMW-4
.
.
.
:It;
MW-14S
15.
".
L2
.,8
L3
SMW-8
.EX-1
- SP-1
. L1A
.~
Monitoring Well location and Number
CAtraclion Well location and Number
.,
Sampling poinl location and Number
Velocity Measurement Poinl
locatioo and Number
Observation Piezometers
location and Number
4- Diameter PVC Pipe
6. Diameter PVC Pipe
x
4-inch Diameter Ball Valve
Concrete Pad
~
o 20
s;;;je in Feel
40
-
..
HI:IRTOlOWSER
J-2365-01 10/91
Figure 2
Concentration of Gasoline - Range Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil
Sol/ Samples Collect,ed between Depths of 6 Feet and Water Tab/ePr/or to /nstal/at/on of Vapor
Extract/on System
"OBi
O'f'l5
f'lfl.Bfl.
'{ot'l
\"\\t'l"
'f'lfl.5
~~~~~~
~ 1- ~~ ThermaIOxldlzor
.........1- ............ "
......... .EX-10 ~
~~ 2~OO 1---.-----
.........1- i SMW-13
(~~ ~TP-a I, LHC
.EX-4 17,000
~ 2000 7 ,
~\ 8 ,.EX-1 SMW-5, S
!-as ~go MW-6
B " LHC
"~ ~~/.~~~~l ' ~ ~11.
~~ , , ,
,,~,~-- \. I
~~"" \ .EX-5 , ' i
~~ "\ \11~0 ASPhalt. \ \
EX-a. \ .~-3
"~~~,~~,~~~_~~_~~~~-~~\ 2i~\
__ , I
\ EX-2.
, "\TP-11 Lowe~\ Yard 3".fO
330 ,
7 EX-7. \
jC. 550' \
\ . \
" \
\ \.
L~__1-
SMW-4
LH!:
EX-9.
'\<,O
.
,
,
.'
, 'MW-15
, S
~
,
,
~
I
,
I
EX-e.
110
,
S
MW-9
LHC
,
~~~
HIGHL<>,
No AVENuE
~'
"'---x
8M CnUe with
Equlpment and
Control Panela
SMw-a
.EX-1
~TP-8
000
LHC
~
Monitoring Well Location and Number
e
E.<traction Well Location and Number
Test Pit Location and Number
(Hart Crowser 1989)
Petroleum Hydrocarbon Concentration
In mg/kg as Gasonne in Soil
(EPA Method B015 Modified)
liquid Hydrocarbon in
Monitoring Wen
Soil Sample Oeplh In Feet
(Presented'as Mldplnt of Sample Interval)
Concrete Bulkhead
Wooden Bulkhead
Concrete Pad
Note: All concrete and wooden bulkheads
were encountered during excavallon,
,
o 20
ScSie in Feel
40
l
..
..
HiJrrrCROWSER
J-2365-01 10/91
Figure 3
Contour Map of Equal Vacuum Measurements in Extraction Wells and Piezometers
Date of Measurements: June 25. 199.1
O'fJ5
t'1",f\~
,\O~
5\.\I~G
'\ 'fJ'"
I'O~
Condensale Tanks
Vacuum in Inches of Waler
18
26
20
20
19
x~
I ~/~0~' -t~-t
,~i-/ hfs,@.\ ~
......--;. o~ ( ~OP ~
-;."""- 0.0- O' \, ~ "-
,~ ~-=--:., ",---.." !
\ ~ 0.5 0-03_
~~ \(::~\~. ~::;--->o ,.. ~. \ \
\~) \'\:' · ;'.' 8 ~ "'\
~~ "\ ~ <0. ..n\ ."
\~,.) Lowe ~ ~ \
\~! ~,.. ~ ) ..:\ l
\ ~~o., ~..n !J
L~__x '?o~ ~ ' /
~~~~O$ ?y
HIGHJ.A
NO A"'€NlJl:
See Crate wllh
EQUlpf'I'1eot and
Conlrd Panell
@
@
-0.115
-0.5-
~
Monitoring Well Location and Vacuum
Measurement in Inches of Waler
Extraction Well Locallon and Vacuum
Measuremenl in Inches 01 Water
Piezomeler Location and Vacuum
Measurement in Inches of Water
~~~~~ ~ ~~~~Is of Waler
Concrele Pad
NoI_: (l) VSC\Jum a. extraction and monilOfing well head! were
measur9d by u.ing . 0- 10 l00-1ndl Wl!!Iiler eQUfYs"enl
vacuum 1)8uge.
(2) Vacuum at phum8l11f' wu meuured using an A1nof
VekHnet.r.
(3l Vacuum a' tha _'a lanko .... mouonod by dif<lcl
reading 0- 10 lfX)-lnc:h nler ~lent Y8.cuum oauge
dedicated 10 each tank.
~,
o 20 40
&;;;ie 10 Feel
-
..
HNrrCROWSER
J-2365-01 10/91
FIgure 4
:no '.
I~
.... l\) .
~.~
iii ~
(.h6
...
~';e~
CO.
...
Volatile Petroleum Hy~rocarbon Extraction Rates
14000 T
I
12000
~ 10000
'1j
~
..0
,.J
.5
t! 8000
o
..0
G
o
.t3
:f6000
S
~
III
'0
.tl
~ 4000 ...
2000
o
11 /7/90
~~
I
.
~ 2000 T \
~ 1800 I 1
:3 1600 I \
.~ 1400 I
c I
~::. .\ /
~ BOO
i =1.. I
~ 2~" .__~---------.-j
11/7/90 12/27/90 2115/91 4/6191 5/26/91
Dille of Silmple Collecllon
.-----.-T
12/27/90
~-... ......----.-.-......
./ . -+- '--""'-'---~/'- ~.
\-~
7/15/91 9/3191
.~
913191
Note: Pounds per day measurements presented In this graph were the total pounds per day extracted as calculated from charcoal tube samples collected
In sampling ports SP-1 and SP-2 (See Table 2).
, .
2/15/91
4/6191
5126/91
7115/91
Date of Sample Collection
Liquid Hydrocarbon Thickness
Monitoring Wells MW-4, MW~6 and MW-9
3.00
. MW4
....
~ 2.50
100.
.5
-0-- MW-6
-+- MW-9
II)
II)
~ 2.00
~
~
g 1.50
..0
- :a
1.1
o
~ 1.00
:I:
'Tj
'3
:r 0.50
0.00
11/15/90
I
7/23/91
9/11/91
.--j
10/31/91
1/4/91
2/23/91
4/14/91
6/3/91
Date ,of Measurement
~ ~. ~...
~ Cl) II
(J) 0)
O)Y'
<:)
.....
"'60
C)
"
CO.
.....
ATTACHMENT - 5
SITE HAZARD ASSESSl\1ENT
~"
SUMMARY REPORT
FOR
CHEVRON TANK FARM
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
JULY 1991
Prepared for:
Washington Department of Ecology
Mail Stop PU-7
.. Olympia;.Washfngion- ~-g504
Prepared By:
Parametrix, Inc.
13020 Northup Way
Bellevue, Washington 98005
&
SAle
626 Columbia Street NW, Suite IC
Olympia, Washington 98501
Contract Number: COO89006
Work Assignment No. 49
6.0 SAMPLING RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
6.1 Groundwater and Free Product Sampling Results
Semi-volatile organic compounds (carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic) were detected in the
groundwater sample (monitoring well MW-4) at concentrations up to 152 parts-per-billion (Ppb)
(nitrobenzene) (Table 2).
The groundwater sample from MW-4 also contains 353 ppm total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH,
EPA Method 418.1), 5,660 ppb Benzene, 2,420 ppb Toluene, and 4,390 ppb Xylene (total).
The free product sample from monitoring well MW-4 contains 90% diesel.
A water sample was not available from monitoring well MW -8 because of the lack of water in
the well (see Section 4.1).
6.2 Sediment Sampling Results
Results from sediment sampling (SD-l, SD-2, and SD-3) are summarized in Table 3. As can
be seen in this table, all compounds are below quantification limits, although concentrations of
some compounds have been estimated (shown as a "J"). Laboratory data validation activities
indicated that there were extremely low surrogate recoveries for all samples. The lab indicated
that this was due to "matrix interferences". The lab did not elect to reanalyze or dilute these
samples. Based on this information, it is not considered valid to attempt a comparison with
sediment management standards. However, trends in the data are Qresent. It is_ncJ~~,Lll}1iL;;lJ
---'leasiutheu[oilowing- comPOtlndsare'.present'in--thesediment-sampies-: ------ -- --- -
· Acenaphthylene
· Fluorene
· Anthracene
· Fluoranthene
· Chrysene
· 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
· Di-n-Butyl Phthalate
· Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
· Acenaphthene
· Phenanthrene
· 2-Methylnaphthalene
· Pyrene
· Dimethyl Phthalate
· Diethyl Phthalate
· Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
· Phenol
Based on the quantification limits utilized by the laboratory, it is expected that these compounds
may be at or above the Marine Sediment Management Standards (WAC 173-204).
Sediment samples from the Chevron site also contain TPH (EPA Method 418.1) concentrations
of 100, 145, and 412 ppm for SD-l, SD-2, and SD-3 respectively. Lead was also detected .at
concentrations of 11.3, 25.8, and 53.3 ppm for SO-I, 50-2, and SO-3 respectively. Xylene
(total) was detected in SO-1 at 103 ppb and in SO-2 at 78 ppb.
Chevron Tank Fann SHA
12
Final, July 1991
Table 2.
Groundwater and Free Product
Semi-volatile and Volatile Organics, TPH, and Diesel Analysis Summary
Chevron Tank Farm, Bremerton, Washington
Analyte
!lI1ill
Groundwater
Semi-volatile
Organics
Phenol ug/L
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ug/L
4-Methylphenol ug/L
Nitrobenzene ug/L
lsophorone ug/L
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L
Naphthalene ug/L
4-Chloroanaline ug/L
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L
2-Methylnaphthalene ug/L
_7_~_N!tl:Q~~!t!~_____ _.. ug/L
Dimethylphthalate - _n ---- ~-uglL-_n
Acenaphthylene ug/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L
3-Nitroanaline ug/L
Acenaphthene ug/L
4-Nitrophenol ug/L
Dibenzofuran ug/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L
Diethylphthalate ug/L
4-chlorophenyl-phenylether ug/L
Fluorene ug/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ug/L
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ug/L
Phenanthrene ug/L
Anthracene ug/L
Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L
Fluoranthene ug/L
Pyrene ug/L
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/L
Orevron Tanlc Farm SHA
Sample Number
MW-4
t\~C\ ~
24 \ \J \ J
22\~ \~
34
(ill' ~ " ~
?'
31
51
134\~~\b
22
14
41
3 r--- -
61
91
71
5 J
11J
2J
15
31
3 J
17
31
31
17
17
4J
5 J
9J _,/'.
49\~ ~\?
13
Carcinogen or Noncarcinogen 1
NC
C
UNK
NC
NC
UNK
NC
NC
UNK
UNK
UNK
NCn
NC
C
UNK
NC
UNK
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
C
UNK
UNK
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
Final. july 1991
Table 2 continued.
Groundwater
Semi-volatile and Volatile Organics, TPH, and Diesel Analysis Summary
Chevron Tank Farm, Bremerton, Washington
Analyte
Units
Sample Number
Carcinogen or Noncarcinogen 1
Groundwater
Volatile
Organics
MW-4
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene (total)
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
5660
2420
4390
C
NC
NC
TPH (418.1)
mg/L
353
UNK
Free Product
. .. Diesel
Percentm
... 90..
.UNK.... .. - ..--.--.. ... H_._
From the Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables, Third Quarter - FY-1990. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, D.C. July 1990, as updated.
ug/L Micrograms per liter (parts-per-billion [Ppb]).
NC Compound is a noncarcinogen.
C Compound is a carcinogen.
UNK Unknown whether compound is a carcinogen or a noncarcinogen.
J Indicates the compound was detected but at a level below the quantification limit. The
number preceding J indicates the approximate concentration of the compound.
mg/L Milligrams per liter (parts-per-million [ppm]).
Chevron Tank Fann SHA
14
Final, July 1991
8.0 REFERENCES
GeoEngineers, Inc., 1988. Report of Geotechnical Services Subsurface Contamination Study
Chevron Bulk Fuel Terminal, Bremerton, WA. Prepared for Chevron U.S.A., Inc. November,
1988. 7 pp. and Appendices.
Hart Crowser, 1989. Summary of Work Accomplished to Date and Pending, Farmer Chevron
Bulk Plant, Bremerton, WA. Prepared for Chevron U.S.A., Inc. November,1989. llpp. and
Appendices.
parametrix, Inc., 1991. Site Hazard Assessment Final Work Plan for Chevron Tank Farm,
Bremerton, W A. May 1991. 12pp. and Attachments.
Parametrix, Inc., May 30, 1991. Telephone conversation with Jennifer Martin of Hart Crowser,
Inc.
Parametrix, Inc., June 4, 1991. Telephone conversation with Brendt Fenske of Hart Crowser,
Inc.
Parametrix, Inc., 1991. Progress, Report for Site Hazard Assessment at Chevron Tank Farm
in Bremerton, W A. June 7, 1991. 4pp. and Attachments.
Washington Department of Ecology, Not Dated. Chevron Tank Farm - Bremerton. Draft Scope
_ ______'. _ __ _ _ _ ___of W_QI~._ _ __m________
Chevron Tank Farm SHA
19
Final. July 1991
ATTACHMENT - 6
17
..
..
HNrrCROWSER
Hart Crowser, Inc.
1910 Fairview Avenue East
Seattle, Washington 98102-3699
FAX 206.328.5581
206.324.9530
Earth and Environmental Technologies
Phase I-Remediation Services
Bremerton Bulk Plant
Bremerton, Washington
u n ..npiepaiedlor....
Chevron U. S.A., Inc.
May 15, 1989
J-~365-0 1
Hart Crowser
J-2365-01
water from MW-l1 was predominantly fresh water
with little or no salt water influence. This is
consistent with a groundwater flow direction
from the site toward the Port of Washington
Narrows.
GROUNDWATER AND FREE PHASE HYDROCARBON LEVEL MEASUREMENTS -
TASK 1.2
Measurements Taken
Groundwater and free phase hydrocarbon level
measurements were made in all wells available on
March 30, 1989. We observed that six out of
nine wells had measurable free phase
hydrocarbons. We then bailed off the
hydrocarbons from four of the wells (MW-4, MW-6,
MW-7, and MW-8) and measured groundwater levels
and free phase hydrocarbon thicknesses again on
April 4, 1989.
.r-'
Our measurements are presented in Table 1. For
comparison purposes, we have also included in
. -"Tabl-e nl"ntne --i;rrounawa:ter revel'Haria-prOduct;--
thickness measurements from the previous study
in september and October 1988. .
Table 1 - Water Levels and Free Phase Hydrocarbon Thickness
Date 9/88. 10/88 3/29, 3/30/89 4/4/89
CGeoEngineers)
Product Water Product Product Water Product Product Water Product
We II Level ill.tl Thickness Level Level Thiclcness Level Level Thiclcness
M\I-4 9.64 10.99 1.35 8.81 12.76 3.95 ' 8.54 12.56 4.02
M\I-5 10.05 8.56 8.22
MW-6 11.08 8.47 12.76 4.29 8.40 12.21 3.81
MW-7 9.93 7.83 8.36 0.53 7.33 7.64 0.31
MW-8 7.16 7.18 0.02 7.54 8.28 0.74 12.63 13.33 0.70
M\I.9 9.88 6.93 8.34 1.41 7.24 8.74 1.50
MW'10 9.37 6.54 6.51
MW.11 8.45 6.03 6.47
M\I-12 17.62 14.91 15.10 0.19 i 4.71 14.97 0.26
All measurements in feet; product level and water level measured as depth below top of casing.
Page 4
Hart Crowser
J-2365-01
Table 2 - Results of Chemical Analyses of Soils
Concentrations in ppm
Sample Depth Fuel Hydrocarbons TPH
Number . in Feet Gasoline Diesel (418.1)
TP-B S-2 2 to 4 58 NO
5-4 6 to 8 17,000 NO
TP-9 5-2 2 to 4 760 5,800
5-4 6 to 8 25,000 NO
TP-10 5-2 2 to 4 30 NO
5-4 6 to 8& 400 NO
TP-11 5-2 2 to 4 NO NO
5-4 6 to 8 330 1,100
TP-12 5-2 2 to 4 NO NO
5-4 6 to 8 NO 210
TP-13 5-2 2 to 4 700
S-4 6 to 8 757 NO
TP-14 5-2 2 to 4 NO NO
S-5 S' to 10 NO NO
TP-15 S-3 4 to 6 1,900
_ _______u___ . ----------~-_._-- S_~4____ __.. 6 to 8 30
TP-16 S-2 --,-2--to 4 --------- -- -- ---"--"-- -----.--_.- HI, -300
------- -..-.
S-4 6 to ,8 3
NO = not detected in sample
Soil hydrocarbon concentration results
summarized. Soil hydrocarbon concentrations
are summarized on Figure 5 for soils within 6
feet of the ground surface and on Fiqure 6 for
deeper soils. Also included on these figures
are the results of chemical analyses performed
in the p~evious study.
Soil hydrocarbon concentration - upper yard.
Soil hydrocarbon concentrations in the upper
yard area appears to be:
predominantly diesel fuel;
generally restricted to a relatively small
area around TP-l;
less than 2,000 ppm concentration; and
highest in the upper 6 feet of soil.
soil hydrocarbon concentration - lower yard.
Soil hydrocarbon concentration in the lower yard
can be considered in two separate zones:
shallow soils less than 6 feet deep, and deeper
Page 8
Site and Exploration Plan
:
iPort Washington Narrows
Shoreline
SMW-8
9-3$
~TP-8
MW-5S
MW-8
$
\~TP-ll
~ -!\rTP-T
\
---.~
G.I~
~TP-10
SMW-4
Lower Yard i
~concrete Wali.
~TP-13
*TP-3
Former Fuel Tank Aria
(Upper Yard)
.TP-4
I
r
f
!
"
---1
Highland AVlnue
TP-11 ~ Tesl Pit Location and Number (Current Study)
M W -1$ Monitoring Wen Location and Number (Previous Study)
9-le Boring Location and Number (Previous Study)
MW-9S
SMW-l0
.TP-8
-$-TP-5
SMW-ll
IP-1 ~ ~
. ..
TP-l -$- 1;est Pit Location and Number (PrevIous Study)
A A' i
U Geologic Cross Section Localion and Dlsignatlon
~
o
40
80
-
Scale In Feet
..
..
HIJR1CROWSER
J-Z:I..-O' 4/59
FIgure Z
Free Phase Hydrocarbon Thickness Measurement~
April 4, 1989
Port Wa.hlngton Narrow.
hordn.
~
I
9V 9~#
SO - -93.8#
S 4.0
90.3#
!
i
f
WOod
Bulkhead
Wall
Highland Avenue
o
40
80
-
Scal. In Feet
1.5
9 MonllomO We' Locallon
Free Ph... Hydrocerbon Thickness
In Fe.t Measured In wen
tldleate. We' Not Pr8'lloully Reported
# 10 Contain Fre. Pha.. Hydrocarbon
..
..
114n,0.-..-
J-Z3...01 ../..
FI".,. ..
ATTACHMENT - 7
, r.:'Y
.r
r-
).
/ .'
I::.'"
10-..,
t~
b<
It
,. .
r .
L'
.r
I
I~:
C
Jd'____ __
f-:.
r-:.'
t.':c"
h;'
j..:
nr;
I' ~ .
"
j' .
.,.'
f-:
~~!
[I,
,
I
!"
t
I-
I
\
." '.
\. '
".
REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION STUDY
CHEVRON BULK FUEL TERMINAL
BREME:RXON, WASHINGTON
FOR CHEVRON, U.S.A.
FILE NO. 0372-34-4
'\
"
r" t
~ '~1
~ '" f'
~I l'
~ ',.';J
kJi::1
Jr "J
~! 'f
j
,.,
,
.1
rij
l!~
r.
~:j
1.',: . 1
>'.;
""..... .
C '
.1',) "
:t:. .
\ ~~. ,
~i:
.,'It.,.
.,\..:..
'~.",
~~1' '~ ~
tr~':.,
~. .i
::: .1
'1:,
~ .
J?;
\.(~,:
(\:j'
~.~,
i1::. '"j
~", '
;o;~..'
1;:'.1
:~. .
;'.. .;
(...1
. (' ,
I .
it.
:f;,~
i;,' I
i., ,
{,~,~,
~;: \:
~);I
I,', :i
.,
t
.
.--:--=-~~._... . :\[---'
I .:' ~. ~:~._"~..' -f-:--7'"-.... '---:-=--=:::::-i-- ~.
, '"
-~
'. -
-. kt:B~~:~~;-.~
. -,- i "-w
.. . . 'j .
--, :. . ('.
I ",.' .,.
.~
Benzene
(g:b)
Ethyl-
benzene
-(Q:b)
2
II'
\\~
i
'lbtal m
Xylenes tA
(rPJ)
'maLE 1
StMo1J\RY OF SOIL ~mCAL OiEMImRY IlNl1\
Diesel
Gasoline #1 , #2
r.ocation (PI:m) (mn) .!mill
B-3 66 <10 <10
M+-4 630 <10 100
Mt-5 4,300 17,000 i <10
Kf-6 230 71 <10
Mi-7 <1 <10 <10
M-l-8 900 <10 200
U\ M-l-9 <1 <10 <10
Mt-l0 <1 <10 <10
Mt-ll 3 <10 , 480
L~12 220 <10 ( ~o_)
''f.~,,'"'''' ,. '.
"'-. ...--
~l 250 <10 1,400
TP-2 31 <10 74
, TP-3 81 <10 250
TP-4 <1 <10 <10
TP-5 <1 <10 <10
" ~;~f,l1P-6 4 <10 62
TP-7 280 <10 47
'Ibluene
(IP:l)
<10 15,000 3,100 12,400
3,400 9,400 2,600 6,800
<10 6,700 2,300 10,500
<10 27 66 <10
<10 39,000 110"QQO 37,000
<10 <10 <10 29
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 520
<10 <10 169 15
<10 <10 201 15
<10 <10 aa 6aO
<1 <1 <1 <1
<1 <1 <1 <1
<10 <10 <10 41
<10 6,100 2,400 2,300
~I.. "
I
I.
':. ~;\. ";~;:'~.:::!i.~':.- ~r '-. ~~- - .-.~ :~~1-t .,._~ ~-_..T--~'_ Qmr'~~:~.~.\.:
'~~'E .
"
,'":0.
if!
'.
:.:-.
'mBLE 2
. ,
r:~'; }
~.~. \ ~
t.... .'
J:.' f
..1 "
, .
~y OF ~ WATER ANALYTICAL OfEMIS'lRY ~
~i'1'
ft'
;(
.;
'lbtal Petroleum
Hydrocarbons Benzene 'lbluene Ethylbenzene
IDeation ():lI:ID ) (R:b) (R:b) (J:dJ)
1+1-4 a. <100 <100 3,600
Mi-5 46.4 1,900 360 290
r+l-6 36.7 2,000 1,500 150
I
Mi-7 76.7 <1 <1 62
Mi-8 1,742 3,900 19,000 2,900
Kt-9 . 38.9 6,100 11,000 1,400
Kt-10 150 <1 <1 : 350
1+1-11 <10 <1 <1 <~
Mt-12 <10 <1 <1 ~,\)
N:>tes,:
a. Sanple contained 75\ naptha
.~'~.. '
~l'. .~.
,.J. , (~
I..... '.
I :,i:: ~,
~/.. .
~~'...
,.cA....
't~.::~
I"
'i(~
, . \.
.1,,"."
~i' .
'r~'l'
.... .'
;:1 "
"
1
~',',' ,
~.. "
~~:.~:~;
. "', 6..
~. ::i=:.
;~ :-..:
Q\
" a
' "
~s ~.*
:r" "
"t(..
~~::"j;
~ ...,
:~~:.~
.1f i-
folll ,:
,1' ;,'
~L'rl
!~"-;i
t~'r.:'~
l,: >
'-"'"
I". ~ .
"
,
I:A
J
J
'lbta1 Xylenes
iJ;d))
23,000
1,900
4,300
21
18,000
9,800
110
<1
<1
.~
.,
2
({t
~
'e'
~
'.
,
;>~ I~:
r
[
f
1
j
,I
1 L
[
r
:.< I
L
'I
I f
j r
]L
,] t
, 1-
"1 '~
- r-Q
, l~
z.
<::)
;-1 _
-.:.~. '
~l:.
..~
~__'ii ~
, ~
_. ..f
"J- "10-
, .
- ~
,t'\
.
:'J~
':'\
. :)
'1
j
...----- "
------........... .
1<,
'1 )~ 1(
MW-7 I Lft-:- S....1l q'~
· J,...,. "Pk>wI u)/ 1/
. (90.80~,{, IS- ~
. / I MW-12 ~ "f!''f J~,@ Ift(O
/ / (91.26).'?"
MW-20 //
Former Fuel Tank( Area
(Upper Yardj
I
~
,/ ~ \~.
;: T!k:~
' --'-,
:~" ..
'""'
'"
"e..., ,~;.
~f.,~ ~.."
Port Wa.thngton Narrows
-
\0.....0-> IO)/rl':.
MW-5.~ ~ .MW~ - a'
(89.82) 0 (89.86) 4. !
~
.'
Terminal Area
(Lower Yard)
TP-~
.D
I
/TP-~
{
I
I
~'.. ~
, \
, ('S. i i);;~/3-
~.
I
1\
, .
. ..-... ~"
1
1
TP-~
TP-6-$-
~
MW-10. ,-
~. (90.41). D
/(90. /
'0 ?-::'" //
-~~t.Lt~/' ~
~... ...
1-'/
MW-11. ,.-
(91.27) D
1P-~
-- II
Highland AVenJe
REFERENCE: DRAWING ENTITLED "GROUND PLAN", DATED 10/16/70 REVISED, BY
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA.
. --..----.' -...........
-...------
tt :1 ~_..:..=-
~
---
I ;
I
,I
-... .,.
,.
a?
"J~
""
Geo _Engineers
,
~
,
,
_:
~N
, !
o
I
40
I
80
I
SCALE IN FEET
, I
EXPLANATION:
B-1~ BORING LOCATION .
AND NUMBER
MW-4. MONITOR WELL LOCATION
AND NUMBER
TP-1~'BACKHOE PIT LOCATION
AND NUMBER
(89.92) RELATIVE GROUND WATER
ELEVATION ON 10/12/88
o GROUND WATER FLOW DIRECTION
MW-10 MONITOR WELL INSTALLED
uULY, 1976 BY GEOENGINEERS
/'1 WATER TABLE ELEVATioN CONTOURS
BASED ON 10/12/88 MEASUREMENTS
70 ~.fIN... v..e II Le 4GJ
-
3,li ~r'Ocl~~
I
.-.
j
I
I
I
J :
!'
j
srre PLAN
FIGURE 2