Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/02/2007 AGENDA FILE CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 D (360) 473-5280 - ***AMENDED*** MAY 2, 2007 CITY COl:JNCIL MEETING AGENDA 1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. in COUNCil CONFERENCE ROOM 603 A. General Council Business B. Executive Session to discuss "Pending Litigation" per RCW 42.30.110(1 )(i) 2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. in CHAMBERS lOCATED ON FIRST FLOOR A. Pledge of Allegiance B. Invocation 3. MAYOR'S REPORT 4. PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. Claims & Check Register (#AB07-093) B. Minutes of Meeting - April 18, 2007 (#AB07-094) C. Minutes of Meeting - April 25, 2007 (#AB07-095) D. Ordinance No. 5006, amending Chapter 9A.12 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the definition of a "Public Place" (#AB07-096) E. Bremerton Tunnel Construction Cooperative Agreement, Supplement No.1 with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT); and Purchase of Streetlight Standards from SPRING CITY ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY (#AB07-097) F. Shelter Plus Care Program Annual Renewal Contract with AGAPE UNLIMITED, Project Sponsor (#AB07-098) G. Ordinance No. 5007, amending Section 2.92.040 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to insurance, self-insurance, and pooled coverage programs (#AB07-099) H. Budget Adjustment to the 2007 Risk Management Fund (#AB07-100) I. Budget Amendment for 2006 Carry Forward Items (#AB07-1 01) J. Budget Amendment for additional principal payments on the Conference Center variable rate debt obligation (#AB07-1 02) K. Budget Amendment for additional street maintenance supplies (#AB07-103) 6. GENERAL BUSINESS A. Amendment to 2007 Budget for General Fund allocation to 2007 recipients of CDBG funding (#AB07-104) CONTINUED ON BACK... &I Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations should contact the City Clerk's Office at (360) 473-5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Council meeting. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Public Hearing & Resolution No. 3030 to adopt the 2008 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan (#AB07-105) B. Public Hearing & Ordinance No. 5008 to amend Section 17.04.040 "Buildings & Construction"; and several minor amendments to Title 20 "Zoning Code" of the Bremerton Municipal Code (#AB07-106) 8. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS 9. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Immediately following the City Council Meeting, the Council Members will reconvene in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603 to hear a presentation on the following item. Please note that no action will be taken, and the content of this item is subject to change... 1. Proposed ordinance to establish a Cable Television Franchise Agreement with COMCAST OF WASHINGTON IV, INC. - Laura Lyon, Finance Director &I Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations should contact the City Clerk's Office at (360) 473-5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL MEETING SPEAKERS LIST PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION FROM THE CITY OF BREMERTON MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING. THANK YOU. PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME BELOW IF YOU PLAN TO SPEAK DURING THE COUNCIL MEETING TONIGHT ~ \{ \ L\ ~ \~ \'\ \IV.- i3 (ZAj) B,4 (2{Z,l t: \:::\" h 4- t( MLA -c\)BV / ~h Icf~ y lJ&tv() 1 DATE SUBMITTED: BILL# (}7-a'j"3 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 5~ .E..........B..E...B..B.R.E~.~E.~...b.E...M.........R.a.E..~...cu...me.~mR~E...E...DEe.el SUBJECT: Claim & Checks Register Approval COlmnittee Meeting Date: COUNCIL MEETING Date: S ---.;( - (j 7 Department: Financial Services Presenter: Cathy Johnson Phone: SUMMARY: ATTACHJ\1ENTS: FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): APPRO V ALS: DEP ARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MAYOR: CONSENT AGENDA [3J I FISC:\l/BUDCET. -OPERATIONS:- ~F. COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ~~ t . 'y$P' RECO:M:MENDED MOTION: Move to approv:. . 1) Check#'s ,~/&:'?>//- 3J;;.~L EFT's 709;;;(- 7//) $ 99~ 09 ~ft;;;C I 2) Regular Payroll for $ 3) Retiree Payroll for $ COUNCILACTION:~pprove .0 Deny 0 Table o Contillue 0 No Actioll DATE SUBMITTED: A-prli /q . UJo7 . I . AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL BILL# 07- Oq~4- 58 ........................................................................................ SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes for meeting of ltp6 \ \ 1(3 ,2-0 07 Committee Meeting Date: COUNCIL MEETING Date: Department: Presenter: N/A mo.,~ ;) i ;;:Loo7 City ouncil Will Maupin, Council President (360) 473-5280 Phone: SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting held A-pr'. \ \ <0) ;).0 07 ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes for Afi~' Ie J ~Do70 FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/A APPROV ALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MAYOR: Council President N/A N/A N/A COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: N/~ ~~J . '" :v~ CONSENT AGENDA IT GENERAL BUSINESS 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table o Continue 0 No Action DIGITAL RECORDING CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, April 18, 2007 The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER 345 6th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, April 18, 2007, at 5:30 PM, with Council President Will Maupin presiding. Council members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Mike Shepherd, Wendy Priest, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Brad Gehring. Also present were City Attorney Roger Lubovich; City Clerk Paula Johnston; and Legislative Assistant Lori Smith. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Cecil McConnell followed by the invocation provided by Pastor Eric Roberts of New Life Assembly. President Maupin announced that a Pre-Council Session to discuss General Council Business was held prior to the meeting. MAYOR'S REPORT . Announced that a Ribbon Cutting Ceremony would take place at 12:30 PM on Friday, April 20 for the Grand Opening of Kitsap Lake Storage located at 6400 Kitsap Way; . Thanked Gary Sexton for all the extraordinary work he has done regarding Harborside Park; and reminded everyone that a Reception would be held on Friday, May 4 from 3:00 to 5:00 PM for the contractors and Public Officials; and the Public Grand Opening would be on Saturday, May 5 from 10:30 AM to 5:00 PM with the Ribbon Cutting Ceremony beginning at 12:00 Noon. PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS Carol Arends announced the Charleston Clean-Up event would be held Friday, April 27 from 11 :00 AM to 7:00 PM; and Saturday, April 28 from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM. The event is sponsored by the Charleston Business Association, and refreshments will be served. For more information, please call "Beth" at (360) 405-4341 or "Jill" at (360) 479-1661. Nick Wofford invited citizens to attend the "Parks & Open Space Plan Update" public meeting to be held at 5:30 PM on Thursday, April 19 in the Bremerton High School Library. Adam Brockus announced that the "Non-Motorized Transportation Plan" would be discussed at the next District 3 Community Meeting on Tuesday, April 24, 2007 from 7:00 to 8:30 PM at the Bremerton Senior Center located at East 13111 & Nipsic Avenue in Manette. Brad GehrinQ reminded Bremerton residents about the Spring Clean-Up event next week from Monday, April 23 to Saturday, April 28; and the Grand Opening & Open House of the new Police Headquarters (in the former Kitsap Federal Credit Union Building) on Friday, April 27 at 10:30 AM. Robert Gilman asked for clarification on a City Ordinance regarding the legality of running multiple taxis in and out of a private residence. President Maupin encouraged Mr. Gilman to submit his concerns in writing to address his issues. Mr. Lubovich suggested that Mr. Gilman speak to Assistant City Attorney Ken Bagwell to receive more information. Lori Oberlander with Habitat for Humanity provided an update on the Hope Project; and announced that there is a paint sale at the Builder's Bargains Store. For more information, please visit the website http://www.kitsaphabitat.orq. Don Larson reiterated information about the upcoming 17'h Annual Sinclair Inlet Clean-Up on Saturday, April 21,2007 from 11 :00 AM to 2:00 PM; and would like to work with the City's Parks Department to purchase trees for planting in various locations of the City. City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes Wednesday, April 18, 2007 Page 2 of 4 CONSENT AGENDA A. Check Numbers 316110 through 316278; and EFT-7070 through EFT-7078 in the amount of $746,000.42 for the period ending April 15, 2007 (#AB07-080) B. Minutes of Meeting - April 4, 2007 (#AB07-081) C. Minutes of Meeting - April 11, 2007 (#AB07 -082) D. Capital Purchase of Cameras and Miscellaneous Equipment for BKAT Studio from VTP (VIDEO TAPE PRODUCTS) INC. (#AB07-083) E. Acceptance of Public Works Trust Fund Loan Agreement No. PW-07-962-004 (#AB07-084) F. Acceptance of Public Works Trust Fund Loan Agreement No. PW-07-962-005 (AB#07-085) G. Acceptance of Public Works Trust Fund Loan Agreement No. PW-07-962-006 (#AB07-086) H. Resolution No. 3028 establishing a hearing date of May 16, 2007 to vacate portions of the alley between Burwell and 4th Street, and Washington and Pacific Avenue (#AB07-087) I. Resolution No. 3029 establishing a hearing date of May 16, 2007 to vacate a portion of former County Road No. 305, adjacent to Marine Drive (#AB07-088) J. State Participating Agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for Hot Mix Asphalt Overlay of State Route 3 On-Ramp (#AB07-089) There were no comments from the public. 05:53:55 M/S/C/U (Priest/Arends) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented. GENERAL BUSINESS 6A- ORDINANCE NO. 5005 AMENDING CHAPTERS 10.12 AND 13.04 OF THE BREMERTON MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE PROVISIONS RELATING TO PARKS (#AB07-090): Wvn Birkenthal, Parks & Recreation Director explained that the proposed ordinance updates current provisions of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to Parks in order to better utilize City park land in the Harborside District and to comply with current laws. Bob Vermeers asked the Council to reconsider the skateboarding restriction since during the last discussion there was a lot of support for skateboarding in the downtown area. Mrs. Arends and Mr. McConnell offered comments in support of the ordinance. Mr. Maupin emphasized that a skate park was built so children would have a place to skateboard safely rather than cause damage to downtown properties which was happening prior to the restrictions. 05:59:35 M/S/C/U (Wofford/Shepherd) Move to pass Ordinance No. 5005 amending Chapters 10.12 and 13.04 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to Parks. 6B - INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NOS. 3. 4. 5 AND 6 BETWEEN THE CITY OF BREMERTON AND KITSAP COUNTY FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF STATE ROUTE 304. NAVY YARD HIGHWAY (#AB07-091): Michael Mecham, City Engineer, provided a Power Point presentation to illustrate that the City of Bremerton and Kitsap County seek to incorporate additional work into the SR304 Transportation Improvement Project (TIP), Navy Yard Highway Phase. These improvements include replacing the existing County sanitary sewer line, upgrades to the proposed storm system, new street lighting, and maintenance of the landscaping. These will be completed as amendments to existing Interlocal Agreement No. 3829 with Kitsap County, and will allow the improvements to be constructed with the City project. City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes Wednesday, April 18, 2007 Page 3 of 4 There were no comments from the public. Mr. Gehring commented how much better the corridor appears since the Gateway Project began and commended staff for bringing this project to completion. Mrs. Priest asked if the streetlights will match the standard used on Burwell Street; and if a bike lane would be included. Mr. Mecham answered yes to both questions. Mrs. Arends hoped that the State will continue to be involved with improvements possibly extending all the way to Gorst. Mr. Maupin believed the process of the project has been interesting and was pleased to see that it is nearly completed. 06:13:05 M/S/C/U (Arends/Brockus) Move to approve Interlocal Agreement Nos. 3,4,5, and 6 between the City of Bremerton and Kitsap County for improvements of SR 304/Navy Yard Highway; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the amendments with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Nick Wofford reminded everyone that next week is "National Volunteer Week" and encouraged everyone to find at least a few hours to donate to a worthy cause; again reminded citizens that there are several City Boards and Committees that have openings; encouraged people to donate blood; and lastly, wished Will a happy birthday on Monday. Carol Arends reiterated information about the clean-up events next week. Mike Shepherd also encouraged involvement in the clean-up events; and commented on a neighborhood meeting held last Saturday to discuss ideas for the downtown sub-area plan. Wendy Priest stated that the initial meetings included those residing within the downtown area, and that the general public will have an opportunity to provide input on the downtown plan at a later time. Adam Brockus provided the Survey Results Manette Bridge Replacement Project Open House held on March 28. Cecil McConnell pointed out that a possible tax increase to pay for increased construction costs of the Manette Bridge was not included in the survey. Brad Gehring reported on a trip to Olympia last Monday to attend a ceremony where the Medal of Honor was presented to Lt. Col. Bruce Crandall, and referred to events that were also featured in the Mel Gibson film "We are Soldiers". Will Maupin thanked Adam Brockus for his work on the Manette Bridge Replacement Survey and feels WSDOT underestimated the interest by the residents in the final results; and reported on his attendance at the Kitsap Transit Board Meeting this week. With no further business, President Maupin adjourned the Council Meeting at 6:30 PM. Prepared and Submitted by: () e>.-', //,-, f ;/ fJ 'A'X'.JJ' ../. .,.....-1"- //i l'/V' ,-"'/.;/j/{/ {l/l ,/ { I ;"';'/ ., ...../\.",:--~, r f "" -...../ ./... '...._,,,..... LORI SMITH Legislative Assistant City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes Wednesday, April 18, 2007 Page 4 of 4 Attest: PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk WILL MAUPIN, City Council President WM:PJ:ls:cg DATE SUBMITTED: PrP(; I ;;Lfo/ ).007 BILL # 07- 09">.5 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL sC-. ........................................................................................ SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes for meeting of A-P(; I ~ 5 j 2J::;o 7 Committee Meeting Date: COUNCIL MEETING Date: Department: Presenter: N/A (!}.~v ~) d-007 Ot CouncIl Will Maupin, Council President (360) 473-5280 Phone: SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting held ft ~i \ ;1.5 I ';L.c::>o 7. 0' ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes for A pc: I :2-5) 2007. FISCAL IMP ACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/ A APPROV ALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MAYOR: Council President N/A N/A N/A COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: N/~ AU~//(?-~ CONSENT AGENDA [B/ GENERAL BUSINESS 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny o Table , o Continue 0 No Action DIGITAL RECORDING CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, April 25, 2007 The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER 345 6th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, April 25, 2007, at 5:30 PM, with Council President Will Maupin presiding. Council members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Mike Shepherd, Wendy Priest, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Brad Gehring. Also present were City Clerk Paula Johnston; City Attorney Roger Lubovich; and Legislative Assistant Lori Smith. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Brad Gehrinq followed by the invocation provided by Reverend Paul Meeker of our Saviour's Lutheran Church. President Maupin announced that a Pre-Council Session was held at 5:00 PM in the Council Conference Room to discuss General Council Business; and the Council will reconvene in the Council Conference Room following this short business meeting for a STUDY SESSION to hear presentations on upcoming agenda items. PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS Brad Gehrinq announced the City of Bremerton's 2007 Spring Clean-Up event will continue until Saturday, April 28 from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM at the Oyster Bay Public Works Facility; and the Rotary Club of East Bremerton will hold their 18th Annual "Blast from the Past" Dance and Car & Motorcycle Show on Saturday, April 28 from 7:00 PM to Midnight at the Kitsap Sun Pavilion Wendy Priest provided an announcement for a special benefit to raise funds for the Hathaway family who were victims of a recent fire that claimed the life of 8-year old Ariana. The event is a cooperative effort of local musicians, local businesses, Bremerton Eagles and Gospel Outreach of Kitsap County; and will be held at the Bremerton Eagels club located at the corner of 6th & Washington on Sunday, April 29 beginning at 2:00 PM. Parking will be available at the City Garage for a discounted rate. Dianne Robinson announced the "Rebuild Together Kitsap" project at 1143 Hewitt on Saturday, April 28 from 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM; all day long; and there will be an Anderson Cove Community Meeting at 5:30 PM at Mataan Park on Monday, April 30 to discuss the Neighborhood Enhancement Program. Carol Arends reminded the public about the Charleston Clean-Up event from Friday, April 27 from 11 :00 AM to 7:00 PM and on Saturday, April 28 from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Refreshments will be served and for more information please call Beth at (360) 405-4341; or Jill at (360) 479-1661. Will Maupin mentioned that he takes advantage of the City's Spring Clean-up every year to rid his yard of ivy and other fast growing plants, and complimented the Public Works staff for their help in unloading his truck. He encouraged other City residents to also take advantage of this opportunity. Ida Mae Cooper expressed her concern regarding a realtor's intention to short plat 1045 Walnut Street, which is across the street from her residence; and asked the City to please keep their promise to maintain their neighborhood as a single-family, low density, residential area. CONSENT AGENDA A. Check Numbers 316279 through 316310; and EFT-7079 through EFT-7091 in the amount of $1,077,931.18; and Regular Payroll in the amount of $684,412.15 for the pay period ending April 15,2007 (#AB07-092) There were no comments from the public. 05:44:50 M/S/C/U (Priest/Arends) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented. City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes Wednesday, April 25, 2007 Page 2 of 2 President Maupin asked the Council Members to reconvene in the Council Conference Room for a STUDY SESSION to hear presentations on upcoming agenda items, and mentioned the public was welcome to attend. With no further business, the Council Meeting was adjourned at 5:45 PM. Prepared and Submitted by: LO~~ Legislative Assistant Attest PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk WILL MAUPIN, City Council President WM:PJ:ls:cg DATE SUBMITTED: April 19,2007 BILL # 07-- O~ (0 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 5D .........am.aa.......aa..m.....aDa..md..o...g.............a..............m.............. SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 5oo(e amending BMC Ch. 9A.12 relating to the definition of "public place" Committee Meeting Date: April 25, 2007 COUNCIL MEETING Date: May 2, 2007 Department: City Attorney's Office Presenter: Roger A. Lubovich Phone: 473-2345 SUMMARY: The cunent definition of "public place" in Chapter 9A.12 of the Bremelion Municipal Code is inconsistent with Chapter 13.04 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to liquor in City parks. The proposed ordinance amends Chapter 9A.12 of the Bremerton Municipal Code to update the definition of "public place" to be consistent with BMC Chapter 13.04. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None APPRO V ALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MAYOR: COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: CONSENT AGENDA "&Q' GENERAL BUSINESS D PUBLIC HEARING D RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Ordinance No. 50 O(p 9A.12 relating to the definition of "public place". amending BMC Chapter COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table D Continue D No Action ORDINANCE NO. 500 Cp AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 9A.12 of the Bremerton Municipal Code to amend the definition of Public Place as it relates to liquor in public places to be consistent with BMC 913.04.140. WHEREAS, the CUlTent definition of "public place" in Chapter 9A.12 of the Bremerton Municipal Code is inconsistent with Chapter 13.04 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to liquor in City parks;; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend Chapter 9A.12 of the Bremerton Municipal Code to update the definition of "public place" to be consistent with BMC Chapter 13.04; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 9A.12 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Alcoholic Beverages" is hereby amended by adding a new section, Section 9A.12.020 entitled "Public Places - Supplemental Definition" to read as follows: Chapter 9A.12 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES 9A.12.010 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL - ENFORCEMENT. The following sections ofRCW Title 66, with the exception of those provisions contained therein for which a violation constitutes a felony crime, are hereby adopted by reference as currently enacted and as hereinafter amended from time to time, and shall be given the same force and effect as if set forth herein in full, and wherever the word "title" or words "this title" are used therein the same shall be construed to mean and refer to RCW Title 66, and "this act" shall mean and refer to the Washington State Liquor Act: RCW 66.04.010 Definitions. RCW 66.04.011 "Public place" not to include certain parks picnic areas. Title liberally construed. "Card of identification", "licensee", "store employee" defined for certain purposes. Unlawful acts relating to card identification and certification card. Permit for music and dancing upon licensed premises. Licensed premises open for inspection - Failure to allow. RCW 66.08.010 RCW 66.20.160 RCW 66.20.200 RCW 66.28.080 RCW 66.28.090 Alcoholic Beverages RCW 66.44.010 Local officers to enforce law - Authority of board - Liquor enforcement officers. Sufficiency of description of offenses in complaints, informations, process, etc. Description of offense in words of statutes - Proof required. Proof of unlawful sale establishes prima facie intent. Certified analysis is prima facie evidence of alcoholic content. Service of process on corporation. Opening or consuming liquor in public places. Sales of liquor by drink or bottle. Buying liquor illegally. Illegal possession, transportation of alcoholic beverages. Illegal possession of liquor with intent to sell - Prima facie evidence, what is. Violations of law. Jurisdiction. Sales to persons apparently under the influence of liquor. Obtaining liquor for ineligible person. Drinking in public conveyance - Penalty against carner. Minor applying for permit. Furnishing liquor to minors - Possession, use. Minor applying for permit. Minor purchasing liquor. Minor purchasing or attempting to purchase liquor - Penalty. Treating minor, etc., in public place where liquor sold. Minors frequenting tavern - Misrepresentation of age - Classification of licenses. Musicians eighteen years and older permitted to enter and remain upon licensed premises during employment. Sales of liquor to minors a violation. Unlawful transfer to a minor of an identification of age. Employees eighteen years and over allowed to sell and carry beer and wine for class E and/or F licensed employers. RCW 66.44.040 RCW 66.44.050 RCW 66.44.060 RCW 66.44.070 RCW 66.44.080 RCW 66.44.100 RCW 66.44.130 RCW 66.44.150 RCW 66.44.160 RCW 66.44.170 RCW 66.44.175 RCW 66.44.180 RCW 66.44.200 RCW 66.44.210 RCW 66.44.240 RCW 66.44.250 RCW 66.44.270 RCW 66.44.280 RCW 66.44.290 RCW 66.44.291 RCW 66.44.300 RCW 66.44.310 RCW 66.44.316 RCW 66.44.320 RCW 66.44.325 RCW 66.44.340 2 Alcoholic Beverages RCW 66.44.350 Employees eighteen years and over allowed to serve and carry liquor, clean up, etc., for class A, C, D and/or H licensed employers. Resisting or opposing officers in enforcement of title. RCW 66.44.370 9A.12.020 Public Places-Supplemental Definition. For the purpose ofRCW 66.44.100, adopted by this chapter, public place as defined in RCW 66.04.010, also adopted by this chapter, shall not include the Harborside Fountain Park pursuant to BMC 13.04.140 or any other public place now or hereinafter specifically exempted by city code or ordinance. SECTION 2. Severability. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2007 WILL MAUPIN, Council President Approved this day of ,2007 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: P AULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PUBLISHED the EFFECTIVE the ORDINANCE NO. day of day of ,2007 ,2007 R:\Legal\Legal\Ordin:mces\Parks\9A.12 Alcoholic Beverages.doc 3 Alcoholic Beverages DATE SUBMITTED: April 13, 2007 BILL # 07- 0 q 7 , AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 5€ ........................................................................................ SUBJECT: Bremerton Tunnel Construction Cooperative Agreement Supplement No.1 and Purchase of streetlight standards from Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co. Committee Meeting Date: April 25, 2007 COUNCIL MEETING Date: May 2, 2007 Department: PW&U, Engineering Presenter: Lynn Price Phone: (360) 473-5272 SUMMARY: Supplement No.1 to the existing Bremerton Tunnel Cooperative Agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) authorizes the City to acquire and provide decorative streetlight standards to WSDOT's Bremerton Tunnel Project contractor. WSDOT will reimburse the City 100% of the costs to acquire and provide the streetlight standards. Supplement No.1 also updates the estimate of cost for the Pacific Avenue Basin CSO main and authorizes WSDOT to reimburse the City for costs associated with providing electrical services for the Project's streetlight and signal systems. Staff recommends purchase of 42 Hudson River Park Lamp Posts as manufactured by Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co. in the amount of$275,359.64, including sales tax. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Summary, 2. Bremerton Tunnel Construction Cooperative Agreement, 3. Supplement No.1 FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): WSDOT will reimburse the City for 100% of the costs identified in Supplement No.1 including the $275,359.64 purchase amount from Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co. The Engineer's estimate for the Pacific Avenue Basin CSO main is $1,336,692.13. Funding for t~_~~9;;j,. work is within the available budget. APPROVALS: i.. . ""---;'f . A ~ DEPARTMENT DIRECTO~:,. -:; ,/1' ,~; 1:~4--_ CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MA YOR: COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ak~ e: ~ ~~_ /tU'gq~ p' CONSENT AGENDA ~ GENERAL BUSINESS D PUBLIC HEARING D RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve Bremerton Tunnel Construction Cooperative Agreement GCA-4924 Supplement No.1 with Washington State Department of Transportation, and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented, and to approve the purchase of 42 decorative streetlight standards from Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co. COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table ab, Agenda Bills 2007, BTC Construction Coop Agmt Supp No 1,4-07 D Continue D No Action Council Summary Bremerton Tunnel Construction Cooperative Agreement Supplement No.1 and Purchase of Streetlight Standards Description of work The City has a Cooperative Agreement with WSDOT for CSO and construction support for the Bremerton Tunnel Project. WSDOT has requested that the agreement be supplemented to include the City acquiring and supplying the streetlights for the Bremerton Tunnel Project. The decorative streetlights will meet the City's standard for the downtown district. The City will supply the 42 streetlights (Hudson River Park Lamp Posts as manufactured by Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co.), including mounting hardware, to WSDOT's Bremerton Tunnel Project contractor for installation. In addition, the supplement agreement provides for reimbursement to the City for the costs of providing electrical services for the streetlight and traffic signal systems. Since the City will own and maintain these systems, Puget Sound Energy (PSE) will enter into a service contract with the City to supply power. The supplement agreement also updates the construction estimate for the Pacific Avenue Basin CSO Improvement to reflect current construction costs. Fiscal Summary The estimated cost for the Hudson River Park Lamp Posts is $275,359.64 (including sales tax). Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co. will supply the streetlight standards. An additional $5,430 is budgeted for anchor boIts and mounting hardware, which will be acquired from a local source. The electrical service contract with PSE is estimated at $5,157.85. These costs will be 100% reimbursed by WSDOT. The Engineer's estimate for the Pacific Avenue Basin CSO Improvement Project is $1,336,692.13 and is funded by an EPA Grant (51 %) and State Revolving Fund and Public Work Trust Fund loans (49%). The CSO Project is included in the City's CIP and is budgeted for construction. Bremerton Tunnel Construction Cooperative Agreement GCA-4924 SUPPLEMENT NO.1 THIS SUPPLEMENTAL NO.1 to the original AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of ,2007 between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation, hereinafter the "STATE," and the City of Bremerton, hereinafter the "CITY" WHEREAS, the Parties hereto entered into the original AGREEMENT GCA-4924 on November 2, 2006 for the construction of improvements to SR 304 by the project entitled "SR 304 - Downtown Bremerton Pedestrian I Bremerton Transportation Center (BTC) Access Improvement Project," hereinafter the "PROJECT," located from M.P. 2.79 to M.P. 3.01, and WHEREAS, the CITY will furnish decorative streetlight standards for the illumination that is required for the PROJECT, as detailed in Exhibit F, and . WHEREAS, electrical power services are necessary for the streetlights as well as signal systems on the PROJECT, as detailed in Exhibit F, and WHEREAS, the STATE is the responsible party for the cost of the electrical power services and decorative streetlight standards, and WHEREAS, the original AGREEMENT also needs to be amended to provide for an updated estimate to the CSO work to reflect current bid items nearing the advertisement of the PROJECT. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to RCW 47.28.140 and chapter 39.34 RCW and in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Exhibit B of the original AGREEMENT is hereby deleted and replaced with Exhibit B-1, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. 2. Section 6, CITY SERVICES FOR PROJECT AND CSO, of the original AGREEMENT GCA-4924 is supplemented to include the following: 6.3 The CITY shall provide forty two (42) decorative streetlight standards for the PROJECT at locations identified in Exhibit F, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. The GCA--4924 Supplement No.1 Page 1 of3 streetlight standards shall include anchor bolts, mounting hardware, pole base, light pole, mast arms, luminaires, and fixtures. The CITY shall provide the STATE a Materials of Origin Certification, Bill of Lading, and a Paid Invoice for said streetlight standards. The STATE shall reimburse the CITY for the actual, direct, and related indirect costs for the procurement of the decorative streetlight standards. An itemized estimate of cost associated with the procurement of the streetlight standards is marked as Exhibit E, attached hereto and by this reference made part hereof. Upon completion of the installation of the decorative streetlight standards by the STATE, the CITY shall be responsible for ownership, operation, and maintenance. 6.4 The CITY shall provide electrical power services for the decorative streetlights and traffic signals systems constructed by the PROJECT at the locations detailed in Exhibit F. The STATE shall reimburse the CITY for the actual direct, and related indirect costs to provide the electrical services. An itemized estimate of cost associated with providing the electrical power services is marked as Exhibit D, attached hereto and by this reference made part hereof. Upon completion of the electrical power services the CITY shall be responsible for the ownership, operation, and maintenance of said electrical power services. 3. Section 7.9 ofthe original AGREEMENT GCA-4924 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 7.9 The CITY agrees to pay the STATE an advance payment amount of two hundred thousand five hundred three dollars ($200,503) within 20 days after the ST ATE submits its first partial payment request to the CITY. The advarice payment represents approximately fifteen (15) percent of the estimate of cost and covers costs incurred by the STATE in the initial stages of the contract. The advance payment will be carried throughout the life of the contract with final adjustment made in the final payment. 4. Section 7 ofthe original AGREEMENT GCA-4924 is supplemented to include the following: 7.11 The STATE, in consideration of the faithful performance of work provided by the CITY, agrees to reimburse the CITY for the actual direct and related indirect cost of the work as described in sections 6.3 and 6.4. All other terms and conditions of the original AGREEMENT GCA-4924 shall remain in full force and effect as modified by this SUPPLEMENT NO.1. GCA-4924 Supplement No. 1 Page 2 of3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this SUPPLEMENT NO.1 as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF BREMERTON By: Cary Bozeman, Mayor Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: CITY Attorney Date: By: Date: By: Date: STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Kevin J. Dayton, Region Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM Assistant Attorney General GCA-4924 Supplement No.1 Page 3 of3 GCA-4924 Exhibit B-1 Downtown Bremerton Pedestrian/BTC Access Improvements CSO - Combined Sewer Outfall Construction Estimate Group Summary: Group 3 Group 4 Total Subtotal $61,751.52 $1,110,785.44 $1,172,536.96 Engineering 10.00% $6,175.15 $111,078.54 $117,253.69 Contingencies 4.00% $2,470.06 $44,431.42 $46,901.48 Administrative Overhead (1) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOT AL: $70,396.73 $1,266,295.40 $1,336,692.13 Note: (1) Per Overhead Agreement OH-00166 GCA-4924 Exhibit B-1 Page 1 of4 PS&E JOB NO: 07C515 CONTRACT NO: 000000 WORK ORDERII: TA2511 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ESTIMATES AND BIDS ANALYSIS SYSTEM *** PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE - BY GROUP *** GROUP NO : 3 DATE: 03/27/2007 TIME: 16: 19 DOT RGG300 PROGRAM ITEM NUMBER CONSTR. TYPE CODE PROGRAM CODE STATE ROUTE (S) COUNTY CONTROL SECTION/SALES SAFETY CLASS CODE FUND NO: 2 330405A CSO-COMBINED SEWER OUTFALL. CITY OF BREMERTON WORK ON WSF PROPERTY P9 304 KITSAP TAX : 188000/8.60% PARTICIPANT: CITYBREM GCA-4924 ITEM STD. NO. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 0001 MOBILIZATION 2 0038 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SALVAGE 24 3151 TESTING STORM SEWER PIPE 32 HOPE DR 32.5 STORM SEWER PIPE 48 IN. DIAM. 95 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (TESC) PLAN 144 7006 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS B INCL. HAUL 146 7008 SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CLASS B 177 7728 MINOR CHANGE 217 '7730 FUEL COST ADJUSTMENT WASHINGTON STATE SALES TAX 8.60% OF $ 56,861.44 GROUP 3 SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING 10.00% GROUP 3 TOTAL SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEDESTRIAN/ BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS 06CS14 PARTICIPATION PERCENT: 100. 00% UNIT HEAS UNIT PRICE L.S. EST. L.F. L.F. L.S. 3.0000 400.0000 C.Y. S.F. CALC CALC 30.0000 6.0000 QUANTITY 80.00 80.00 339.00 1,193.00 GROUP 3 BASE SUBTOTAL MAX AMOUNT: AMOUNT 5,900.00 250.00 . 240.00 32,000.00 644.44 ' 10,170.00 7,158.00 -1.00 . 500.00 . :)6,861. 44 4,890.08 61,751. 52 6,175.15 67,926.67 PAGE: 14 VER: 1 * ** *** GCA-4924 Exhibit B-1 Page 2 of 4 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ESTIMATES AND BIDS ANALYSIS SYSTEM *** PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE - BY GROUP *** GROUP NO : 4 CSO--COMBINED SEWER OUTFALL. CITY OF BREMERTON WORK PS&E JOB NO: 07C515 CONTRACT NO: 000000 WORK ORDER#: TA2511 PROGRAM ITEM NUMBER CONSTR. TYPE CODE PROGRAM CODE STATE ROUTE (S) COUNTY CONTROL SECTION/SALES SAFETY CLASS CODE FUND NO: 2 330405A P9 304 KIT SAP TAX : 180301 /0.00% PARTICIPANT: CITYBREM GCA-4924 ITEM STD. NO. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 0001 MOBILIZATION 2 0038 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SALVAGE 20 3091 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 21 3105 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 48 IN. DIAM. 24 3151 TESTING STORM SEWER PIPE 25 3541 SCHEDULE A STORM SEWER PIPE 12 IN. DIAM. 31 HDPE DR 32.5 STORM SEWER PIPE 36 IN. DIAM. 32 HDPE DR 32.5 STORM SEWER PIPE 48 IN. DIAM. 76 5334 ANTI-STRIPPING ADDITIVE 78 5711 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 79 5767 HMA CL. 1/2 IN. PG 64-22 80 5830 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT 81 5835 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT 82 5875 COMMERCIAL liMA 82 6516 CYCLIC DENSITY PRICE ADJUSTMENT 83 . ASPHALT. COST PRICE ADJUSTMENT 85 6403 ESC LEAD 88 6470 STREET CLEANING 91 6478 STRAW BALE 92 6490 EROSION/WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 95 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CTESC) PLAN 109 6859 PLASTIC STOP LINE 131 6973 OTHER TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEDESTRIAN/ BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS 06C514 PARTICIPATION PERCENT: 100.00% UNIT MEAS UNIT PRICE QUANTITY L.S. EST. EACH EACH L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. EST. S.Y. TON CALC CALC TON CALC CALC DAY HR EACH EST. L.S. 1,100.0000 2,800.0000 3.0000 35.0000 325.0000 400.0000 1. 00 1. 00 1,579.00 77.00 1,163.00 339.00 7.0000 70.0000 1,390.00 17 4.00 55.0000 200.0000 125.0000 25.0000 20.00 40.00 10.00 L.F. L.S. 8.0000 12.00 DATE: 03/27/2007 TIME: 16: 19 DOT RGG300 PAGE: 1 5 VER: 1 MAX AMOUNT: AMOUNT 114,500.00 250.00 . 1,100.00 2,800.00 4,737.00 2,695.00 377,975.00 135,600.00 180.00 9,730.00 12,180.00 370.00 240.00 30.00 148.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 250.00 80,000.00 644.44 96.00 7,900.00 GCA -4924 Exhibit B-1 Page 3 of 4 PS&E JOB NO: 07C515 CONTRACT NO: 000000 WORK ORDER#: TA2511 ITEM STD . NO. NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ESTIMATES AND BIDS ANALYSIS SYSTEM *** PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE - BY GROUP *** GROUP NO : 4 DATE: 03/27/2007 TIME: 16: 19 DOT RGG300 PAGE: 16 VER: 1 UNIT MEAS UNIT PRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT HR 45.0000 120.00 5,400.00 L.S. 14,835.00 C.Y. 30.0000 6,357.00 190,710.00 S. F. 6.0000 16,861.00 101,166.00 EACH 5,000.0000 1. 00 ~),OOO.OO EACH 6,000.0000 4.00 24,000.00 EACH 8,000.0000 1. 00 8,000.00 CALC -1. 00 L.S. 750.00 CALC 500.00 GROUP 4 BASE SUBTOTAL 1, 1l0, 785. 44 * 133 6992 OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR 134 6974 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR 144 "7006 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS B INCL. HAUL 146 7008 SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CLASS B 166 7364 MANHOLE 60 IN. DIAM. TYPE TYPE 3 167 7365 MANHOLE 72 IN. DlAM. TYPE TYPE 3 168 7366 MANHOLE 84IN. DIAM. TYPE TYPE 3 177 7728 MINOR CHANGE 178 7736 SPCC PLAN 217 7730 FUEL COST ADJUSTMENT ENGINEERING 10.00% GROUP 4 TOTAL SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEDESTRIAN/ BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS o 6C514 111,078.54 1,221,863.98 *** GCA-4924 Exhibit B-1 Page 4 of 4 GCA~4924 Supplement No.1 Exhibit D City of Bremerton Electrical Services Description of Work The City of Bremerton is providing Puget Sound Energy (PSE) electrical services for streetlight and signal systems for the SR 304 - Downtown Bremerton PedestrianlBremerton Transportation Center (BTC) Access Improvement Project. The streetlight and signal systems will be owned and maintained by the CITY upon completion of the Project. Costs to provide electrical services for streetlight and signal systems will be paid by the CITY and reimbursed by the STATE. Estimate of Cost Three (3) Electrical Service Agreements: $5,157.85 Administrati ve Overhead (1) $0 TOTAL: $5,157.85 Note: (1) Per Overhead Agreement OH-00166 GCA-4924 Supplement No. I Exhibit D Page 1 of 1 GCA-4924 Supplement No. 1 Exhibit E City of Bremerton Supplied Decorative Street Lights Description of Work The City of Bremerton will furnish 42 decorative streetlight standards for the Bremerton Tunnel Project meeting City requirements for the downtown district. The decorative streetlight standards are the Hudson River Park Lamp Post as manufactured by Spring City Electical Manufacturing Company. The City will furnish the standards, complete with anchor bolts and mounting hardware, and decorative luminaires. The materials will be made available for pickup by the Bremerton Tunnel Project Contractor at the City of Bremerton's Oyster Bay Maintenance and Operations Facility located at 100 Oyster Bay Road, Bremerton. Estimate of Cost Hudson River Park Lamp Posts, including luminaires, 42 @ $6037 each: Anchor bolts and mounting hardware: Sales Tax @ 8.6 %: Administrati ve Overhead (1) Total: Note: (1) Per Overhead Agreement OH-00166 $253,554 $5,000 $22,236 $0 $280,790 GCA-4924 Supplement No.1 Exhibit E Page 1 of 1 , ......~ '.. .... ," .. '--.' ,". / ... '. /- '- ',/ - '-}--J~ <; <I ; ;}. ...- .'.' .'.-.-- '-'. _ SEC. 14 24N., R1E., W.M. II I I i j i 0~~ ; A~ \1 ':~ 1j--- \-"''/ ~"0 I I I CONllUITfMRE GENERAl. NOTES I. SYSTEM GROUHOING WlRES NOT SHOWN. IISTAlJ. PER COOE CONOUITfMRE SCHEDULE NOTES (1) lHSTAI..l PIAl ROPE I2JEwTY 13) C'N CONllJIT AT lAITOF CONSTRUCTlON 14) SCHEo.u 80 PVC (5; RalOVE EXISTING CONDUCTORS l~.. ST~ ~Jr ~ lU~ ~ C~ 110 851+45.00 32:11'.!!:- 35' ~!6' 250-WSIGtW. ,-, 111 858+05.00 -tTUlT.:; :: ~:::=: ,., -;,;-- -;;:;;- -;;~~. -'-IT--' f- :::=~ 1-2 ~ --- --- ~- 4' lOO-WCECORATl'IE 113 BWSB+TD.OO 2S.C'lT. +- --: 1QO.WDECORATIVE 1-1 -- ----~---- ----.- ------ 114 859+20.00 2C.5'RT. ~*--- . ::--~~ 1-.2 -- '---i~--- --~ too.WOECClAATNE _~~~ BW~.oo lUll:it=~ ~;-- tI>>WM~~__ ~___________ __~________._ 118 B5H7.00 2URT. ~--~~ :::=~ '-2 117 BW>>tOO.OO 2lI.D'lT. =it- ~J--~ ~~~~ '~-.~- -.--------------.-~---- --- ~;:: ::::::- ----------. ---_._----~~ ~_ ~~-==~__ _~~:~ ---:fr= _..~_~_-- l00-WDECOAATrif 1-2 _ _ _____. 120 861+88.00 24.5'RT.~--~-!...~~ 1.2 ____ ___...._..._ ___.___ ~ _~:'_ ~~_~~ ____n__________ ZIQ TlO+M.((I 19.5'LT. J!'....- 4' 1t>>WDECORA.TlVE 2-1 .__ 3.__ ~__ 100.w~~ ___________ __..___ 211 T11t35.oo 19.5' LT. ~~ :: ~:::=;: 2-' _.~ -- ~--- ---~-- -----~~_..- 212 T1h97.oo l!l5'LT.:; :: ~:::=:- 2-1 SEC. 13 T.24N., R1E., W.M. GENERAL NOTES LEGEND l N I EXiSTlIIG tEWlRElOCATED COBRA HEAD lIGHT STANOAAD DECOP.ATIVE lIGHT STANJARD ~ I 1 -I -4-< 1. ORIENT.NNCTlON BoxEs I>::. SHQWtl ON M F'tANS AND DETAILS. 2. ME WElL JUNCTION BOXES SHAlL BE 1NSTm.ED PER DETAILS l.2.3.4.5.& 6 ON &-fiT EOo4. '::"......,. .~' .~)--<>-2. ~ C06RA HfAD lUMlNAlRE ON SIGNAL POLE EXlST1NG BTC LJGHT1HG ro.E JUNCTION eox. TYPE 1 JUNCOON 80):. TYPE 2 CONDUIT AND MRlNG J. SEE OWG. ED1 FOFITREE waLlOCATlONTAIlt.EANDM4CTlON SOX TA8lf, co.c 0->>-0 &; " 4. SEE rmG. ED2 FOR SrNGlE lH: 0IAGfW,L S. SEE DWG. EI>4.-.ND EllS FOO SIDEWAlK, POlE, JUNGT\OflI BOX AND CABINET FOONOATlOH DETAI.S. " 6. S'fSTEM GROUNOlNG WIRES NOT SHOWN IN CONDUIT I WIRE SCHEoo.E. INSTALl PER CODE. i:82 ElfCTRJCAL SERVICE CABINET w z :J ci: i , , I I u 7. HSTAlJ.1.TDlAMETERPMPTYccmuITINAI.lUUYlNATlONRUNS ; , ,J0 L....1 SCAlE"":~ EXCBmNO'~1'2''''I3,26.''''l3ANO'' n k~ ~ IS UTIUTY:::i'~ I ~/~.'i I' [2) ^'^ ~--- :-~C~'~-~\- I( f2\ 10 I ~1t7 I--=' - -=.i::":--~~ .~ ~'J :. - - /il'. rl5l /6) ,~l --' '_- _~c---,..: ~-~'-~-1\m--I,S-j':l1+00 ;;;:\ 22 ^~ ___ (C:f."../CflY~Cf t'JM ! ~..w~ _ _ --.Y:':~~1 ~~-'''': - 1\2\ 0 I '~1*hNO"'I""""...~... '7-.13': /.::;.~-o--.,_~~.. :=:,~ - - ,t.U), - ..//15 l~2 ~: t,V . --~ '. .A'J_ Pli -- - )!--.----. ll"::\, - - 210 r 1 '1>-.1 r ~ 0 ~ ~1~)~~,2;t3: ~~' / , ,... "Y@~ /:; V,,:~~u ~V.;11 58+ ~ MINE 59+00 10+00 ~EIM'm-'--l ~ . .' /,\ ^ - ,~ i ~ ~ - /\ 4 - - _ !;., A 60+00 _ ~ ~_ ^ _~ 1; H ,,/ ,., ~ ,....~~ ~;~ - ~ ~. IF - T. Id~'J2_ - ':'o~--:,o';'- _o'i-:'.~-'--J___~'~":"-5::,="~,, '~16 _':'~_ ,-,_~M 1-'9,~ lA1~. r-- ,.., ,All ,_ I~ @I ~ d;jJ ~ 2 '~~ -~--~~'l8~~=&~~':_~01 Q'J TREE WEll 8 S! CONDUIT/WIRE SCHEDULE (ILLUMINATION AND TREE LIGHTS) N"::ER CONlXJlT UIMlNAS:::CE ~ UGHT -----n::wIiNATION SE~ H~E UGHT -- IlH-"IlNATION SERVICE NO~E UGHT REI<<lTE NOTES D S~ ~~~f!- ~-~: C~~~~S~: 2~/1~~7k- ~~ 3:A~~~~rk-. PHOTOCEJ. ~ :~ ::;. ~---:- ~~ -t--i .:. I :---+--:- "" f-.---'---- , ~ 2-Ill.. '----+. . . . L. .L' .-T~ ,_-'-_--'---__--'-- : 1: ~:- -. . ~+--_-:-: ~-~::= i I .~- -~~ ---i- ~-. T 2~":.' +- : ~ : . : .- - : ,- !. - " - - -----'-T -'.- ---;--+---:- 1~ ~ I 2";/0 +.~~- -~- i- I . _:_~. I . -- ~-- 11 1.5" 2-16: 2-*8 _-----I- 2-18 I . +-: - I I _!~_~ J.I12 ~ :: .l_~ .--C-=-__ ~-'--=- :: 1 2" ~'.--tj~ 4;:"" -'--1~+'-'- + ~F~ ~~.+-:-- --- I . .;~ -h-~.--T-.I1~ : - ~ . 1 .:- ---_.- .JL ,-E- 1~ . ;~+-'- >ie' I~ i _=__L:Il--= _~2-- --'---~ : ~ I - -'.--- ::: 248 i 242 ~- ! : t-~--+-~ :~---=- LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE .;;;.. ',"".1""1 ,"', ..,...-,. '.J ,,~-' m4M"/b ~. ~,;~f~ (.. . !~ ',..' V .. ;./>,,,,/6~"'J_~':l/.:"'Y ~~ W~e S~alIlg~WJl e PO~lO/'Id.~~ ';..~1''''8~.{ ~,\.!7,.~ <(,:' :~~~ LOCHNER Washington State Department of Transportation SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEDESTRIANI BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS I-----sHm-- /31 2;~ "'('.J.) ~C. -'._ <~, Sy~;$~~'~; ~- -~~==~I-:;-;~~ ~h ~_-=.--=--=-~--~~~ ~~:~ -==~==~.~==-=.~~~~=.=~-~~~=-~-=--=~-~- - .--- =-~=_-'-0cTaaeR"'" ~''':'~~~-=-----==_=--=--=:::::=---=------=---- .::::::::: ",~~~I.~;~:::~ l ~ W .;';i-',iSIG': .- "r ,l.f'P':: CONSTRUCTION NOTES (3) o INSTALl Z':J}.W lUMINAlRE AT 15--fOOTMOIJNl'ING HEIGHT, SEE SIGNAL fllNtl. OWG 151 CONSTRUCT FOUNO,I,TlON ATSTATlON AHD CEN1ER1.INE OFFSET SHOWN. SEEClTYOf BREMERTONSTANOAAO DWG.101-l, EXCEPT USE 4 ANCHOR 901. TS PER POLE MAHUfACTURER'S REOOMMENOATKlNS. FURNISH 00 INSTillDECORATlVE STEel UGKT STANDARD,IH() LUMINAIRES FURNISH AND lNSTilllYPE t Jl.JNC11ON eox AD.JACl:NT TO ST.6.NDARD PER DWG. EDt, DETAJlS 1, 2, J, 4 & 5~TE TO MIACOO S[)EWAACONOOlONS CD FURH~ AND INSTAll T'Yf>€ l.RlNCTlON BQXAOJACENT TO fflEE W8..l. PER tNtG. ED4, DEl A116. FlRNlSH AND INSTALL UANUNE caIDUll ~D'NlRE INTO JLINC11O+1 BOJ( PERWlflHl Sl:HEtlJLE. COt. 3 FEET OF WIfE IN EACH JUNCTlON lOX INSTAll PHOTOC8.L ON STREET lIGHT PCU CONSTRUCT FOIJN)ATION FOR SERVICE CABINET AT STA. B 58t17.00, 32.0' LT. SEE SIGNAl. PLANS AND lNSTA!.l FOUNDATION PEROWG.ED5, DETAI..8 ANODETAll ~o. FURNlSHANDINSTAIJ. SERVICE CABINET AND COMPONENTS FOR SERVICE NO.1, SEE CWO, ED1 FOR SERVICE REQUIReMENTS AND BREAKER SCHEDULE @ @ @ (B) APPROXIMATE lOCATION FOR Pst: twilHOlE FOR SERVICE COIINECTlON CONSTRUCT FOUNDATION FOR SERVICE CABINET AT ST.... 8W 31+<13.00.12..0' RT. SEE SIGNAL PlANS AND INSTALl FOUNDATION PER OWG. ED5. DETAIL 8 NlD DETAll to. FUAAlSH AND INSTAll SERViCE CAaINET -'NO COMPONENTS FOR SERVICE NO. 2. SEE DWG. ED1 FOR SERVICE REOIJIREMENTS AN!! BREAKER SCH€DUlE @ SEE QWG. 152 FOR lOCATION OF PSE HANDHOlE FOR SERVICE COIlN<CT1ON - GCA-4924 Supplement No. I Exhibit F Sheet 1 of 4 1L2 IllUMINATION PLAN J ;~;~'-. A N I LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE (CONTlNUED) ~ ~ ~ lUt.lN.e W~RE Ci~~IT REMARKS ~. S'?-n5N I ~ ~:tJ~ LU=Rf LU~~Rf CU~~IT Ra:ARKS lJ - Sf IT 4' l00-WDECOAATJIIE at! 1'.(' ,oo.w~~.!_ "- ezt8500 ~~~ --:i;---~~-~ 22__ _ __~__ ..__..,_,._ "_~___ 643/1,00 24.5'LT. __~ 4' 1QO.WDEC(lRATIVE 2-1 . .._._ i 24SRT. ~ -~_;=;;::~~ _~:~__, . .____ ______________ ~_ ~8',-..s.-~~.~:1.--,",-.~RT,-T..~-~-:,T~.--~-~.',4~---- _':;W;-OE:~~.~-.=.~--,;m.. _.~........-.._..~ '_.- ~_-~~-___,___ i- j..o1" 24m ~~~ -=f. _ :;~=:: _'~_ ___H_ ._ ." ~~ 0 'T ". ';WOE;;;;;; , ! ,tmm:: :~~ ~~-- $ill~~:~ --------.=- ~;~_Ii~~~_~~~ i ~i~ i!~} ~~.-~~~~~-.' r .i;~---.o~~ ' ~-" SEC. 13, T.24N., R1E., W.M. '" I p....,., f"RRT -if;- f. ~::=: " . , ? "'"-^'-~~ ~--:--'2\ _L~:\ '" '67.35." I"OLT .~ -+- :::=~ " : ~ ~--~\ ( -~ . (l} \ .... ~ ,,'f~~ Ji\ Lf ~ ~ '-\ " , H1NE ~'\~~\~~~, r,15~...-.;c~ __ ~~ ~ ~~W .< ~-~J'008W.l!N~~~~r 2iJ~"T {../'l ~\'~2ila' -:-;~/.:t4~:;ik~~/~ H,~:/ "'.: E_..~' ,,' "11' 17 J ^/ -<, . ':: _- - - - - - I +00 ~ L~ I- ...... ~ t-~ ~ -. _ --k~ ~~\ _ _ B-LINE 6s.QO !~: ~.~~I!' ~ 66+00 ';'lfiAI3. (','A" ,1AlS~~ lC' ~2C3 11&' -,(.\. -~" I,~ .fo..~''--_I '1, ;.... I l.Lr I I 2C4 ,.,..;:;- 2C5 ~~~ 218 VA -- ""'" -. +-. -r ~2" L~, \.~,. l"eC, ~.:..c~~ ~~1' . :.'_ L _. 'ih ....~7._~.J. ;; ~~ 'CJ~,-'!_< ~-'\ :crt---- .~-~-~~ . ~ '~ ''W &)dC ~/A)d" \Y 1~,:DhLl-~~l1~ ..... ~<:ONDUIT~~:NO~C~.D~LE (~;~,I~ATION AND_~;;3L1G_HTS) " ~~~};.:: -J-:~~I {,\ ,'" COIIlJT f-w.oi""KJN r TllEELIGHT ilLlJljl"'TION TREEU"'" ~ilON;::'''' TllEEuGHi'- REMOTE ~ j ~;ir~t;r--~ _">: D1 SIZE ClRcurr,S(2~ "~~ 9~3~" __SIRa.JlTS(12OVJ. C~fTS(2040V) _~_"_ HOTOCELL NOTt:S J:-'\A 33 r;.~' <:','.- 1-1 : 1-2 1.." I 1-8 2.1: H 2-" i 2-8 ,2-C ~1 ~ 3-2 3-A! 3-8 ! J.C ~ >>:;:: ~ II 3 .A ::" I ,...: .-:--j--=---: L t--'--'- I .': -----'--- ~3A21H~-"^ /\ l:6M": i7i'rTYSERVlCENO' .' :' '; I '.' ::---t-:----:-T+~ ---:~.: l':.J ~_ -'-_~ -'--- " .-~ ~12/ ~ '-- I=;" _ :. 'WI"" 0' '. . ,.. , . --'----1--:--.' ... ' 1 '-"'--- . i.. - , . 1 . . " .. 4 . '.- >~;l:;'I- _-'--J_-,--:-T,... -. , - , . . L:.' -- K~ ="f~= 'r;' 'l"o.Hl<D/\ , . .1.' -;---1--;-- ''''1''''' - J_l . ; I \ ':<' [Cl,I'-L:0, ........';;z.~.:.. ~ : E~I.. ~~_~._: +~ :.",;. :'- t-c.~;== . ~:: :/,i to 384 t---~'{ji,' :!'~"C~;$II" r ~-- - ; - -:--+:- -:-+~- ':: . - , - .. 3-112 I: 3A3 -~~ -:t\ 26 ." :.C.." L.:__ ~ -'-- -;--r-:--!---'--c ,... .' ". t- I -' 'f..../.- "'~ '-- ' '. I:,~ l:': -:,-;-- ~_:,~ :"ro-2~-j.':""~~:-t=~.t=:"":::~ 1\ J'~ 3M I~ (3~f~() I.,. I' . i ' t:=t.:-- --+---- -:'-+-. : - ,...,. .' -:-r-:- >112 . L~ " ' ~,' f\\ ,>.,.~)' u"~-I'I :-- --:---1'-:-- -:-=c-:--r:--- ,...-,-:' ~-:-+~~---:-- _n__ '--- I. 3M ^ 11''--- j~..\ .... :>';,.'1-:-. '; " ~- _ - --:--.i ~:: ~--- ^ ,j: ~/:."":", f\ 38L'S-., - - ........ ~._'. 1 . ' ,.. : ,... ....--'--- L!'_\ '.- 1>5;111 -...... ~-~~l---=- . ! . ~-+---:---+~~-_. }~_1248 _ ---\ ~I - '~'--1 ~ .~'r-f- - .. ...'---;--:-- "':'~-'--- _,---~,,:,,,;,,,:,,,,2:!"--+_~_ .- --- -.:Jl. 3B6 I"~ 'f,r-f--. . -:--J....- -'--t-'--- -:---r-:---T-:--"':u ,. I -- ~I MATCHL'iNEP 67.80:000t~ Il4- :;,D-- -:.n_t-- _ . t--:--- 1:-: ' . ~ . f--:-- ~----=-- CONDUlTM1RE SCHEDULE NOlES . . ~~n ::::.:.:._ -----..-.- :...,~~- ~_ ,~:~-~~~~~=~. ill ~~:W~~TRU~ 4" .' - . +---.-~ _:_~_-...:- ----t- -- ~_.L-..........___L_ (4) SCHEDt..UfIOPVC i .'." 2.#8: 2-18 ~Ui-12..f31O--r'U12 .- 8 ~ . W z J ::; ci. .. 0 L..~ SCALE IN fEET .. ---l >-:1.... .,,' GCA.4924 Supplement No.1 Exhibit F Sheet 2 of 4 GENERAL NOTES 1. ORtENT JUNCTION80XESASSHOO'NONrnEP~ANDI)F:TAJLS 2. TREE WELL JUNCTION BOXES SHALL BE INSTALlEO PER OETAH..S 1,2,3,4,5.& 6 ON SHEET EDt 3. SEE OWG. Em FOR TREE WELL lOCATlON Tl\BtE AJ<ID JlJNCT!ON OOXT.-.BLE. .. SEE OY/G. FD2 FOR SINGlE LINE OtM;RMl. 5. SEE OWG. ED4 AND EOS FOR SIOEWAlX, POLE. JUNCTION BOX AND CABlHET FOl.JN)ATlON OET.4.Il..S '" ..-1 a. SVS1B.4 GROIJNOIHG WIRES NOT SHOrVN IN CONDUIT IIMRE SCHEOI.A.E. INSTALl PER COOE- 7. tJSTALL 1.'l'QW.lETERPMPTVCOOOUIT IN ,IoUIUWNAT1ONRUNS EXCEPT RUN NO.1, 2. 11. 11, 26, 29, 33 AID 39 CONSTRUCTION NOTES :~ CONSiRUCT FOUNDATION AT ST ATlON AND CENTERLINe OFFSET Sl-lO'Ml. see CITY OF BREMERTCN STANDARD OWG 11)14, EXCEPT USE . ANCHOR BOLTS PER POLE MANUF.I.CTlRER'S RECOhIMEOOATIONS. FURNISH ~o INST"lL DECt:lRA11VE srm UGHT STANDARD AND LUMINAIRES AJRNISH AND INSTAll TYPE I JUNCTION BOX ADJACENT TO STAHDAROPER OWG. ED4, DETAn..s 1, 2, 3, 4&5Af'?Rt)MLATE TO ADJACENT S1DEW~ COlolOlTlONS \'2) =::'~NS~~ri:D~~C~=~~~ t.IAINLlNE CONDUIT AloiD WIRE INTO DICTION BOX PER WIRING SCHEDUlE. COIL J FEET OF WIRE IN EACH jIMCTJON BOX o @ INSTAll PHOTOCell ON STREET UGH'T POlE ""PROXIMATE lOCATION FOR FSE l-W()HOLE FOR SERVICE CON~CTIOO @ CONSTRUCT FOut.CATiON FORSERVlCE CABINET AT 5TA P lI6+83.00. 23.0' LT. SEESIGNAlPl...f.NSA~INSTAU FOUNDATION PEROWG. E05, DETAIL 7 ANO DETAIl 9. F\JR.NlSH AND ~STAJ..l. SERVICE CABINET AND COMPONENTS FOR SeRVICE NO. J. seE rNIG. E01 FOR SEIMCf REQUIREMENTS NID BREAKER SCI-IEDULE LEGEND EXISTING NEWlRROCATED ,,----ec: CoeRAHEAD liGHT STANDARD ,.>.,.<2 C'''''',<;.' OECORATlVEUG/fTSTANl'JAAD ~ COBAAHEAD llMNAlRE ON SIGNAl peLf G<-<.J 0" <>.-8 EXlSTINGBTCUGHTtNGf'QI.E .oj JUNCTlQNBOX, TY'I"E 1 N .II..INCTIONeox. TYFE2 --- COOOUrrmO\'l1RING Sf.ij ElECTRICAl. :;ERVICE CABINET ~J TREE '^'Ell t.mllTYHmJHQE 5'x1'x5'VMJl.T CllOWlooc; II.!II0(R II ~ Cl ,>" ';.; ~ exeltech Washington State Department of Transportation SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEDESTRIANI BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS IL3 ~__~-l- . 132. ",'~' _",'/:<S7;;', ,,~ .: .."" ", , " \.q..., "~.:v.-,(jl ~~;~~1~~ , .._.."m~ LeCHNER -_.-.=~~::=~._~ ___.__u_______~ ---- ..==-H.____ I:;'W.J! --~='~~_-._~~~~ ~_I-_~~=~_____'_'_~'=-_~_~'.~~'~__.=-___.~:~~=:'-="~~~ - _.=~- ,'__ ':l;'. 'i'~' ___._..__u....: __ u.....___..___~__..____ _... Cb' ';.~ ~- - - - .;:;ZTC"I------ ------:~.~-.-.--._-..--.---- -'--.. -.;~~ .... ill Qlymria, W. S"fIlIl~. Wa p~rtI.~I"<I. OR ILLUMINATION PLAN 0> Z!} -~-~~ocroBafm ---.---.-.--~-2008 ----"---OCTOOER-m! - ---~~-,. SEC. 13, T.24N., R.1 E., W.M. $-LINE :7.'.7[ ,~C. A'D fOP:'::,;. 'lIf.S'" CONDUITIWIRE SCHEDULE (ILLUMINATION AND TREE LIGHTS) S€RVICE~,1 SERVlCENQ,2 CONDUIT iwi"MlNATlON'- -- TREEUG~ - UIMNATIOO- -,.--- TREE UGHT ~- SIZE CIRCUITS (24QV) CIRCUmi (12011) CIRCUITS !24OV) CIRCUITS (\201/) 1-1-~ 1="2~ --':A"--ii:e- 2-t 2:2~" --2-A'-2-"B-:-'-i:C - I _ : _ . -c-=-. . 1-. ~--L-:_,__ _=_IL__~.!~-:-_ RUN """"'" ;\ ,--, ~ 1.5" 28 29 .. " " 31 " N'-::, .~ ~, 2_~ 1S , , ,. . . ________..._~EfMCE N~..1 ._ UUMI~TlON TREE'UGHT CIRCIJITS(201OV) ClRCU!TS(12OV) 3-1 '-ii -j:A-'"~J:6i-3-c-- u. ,... _ _..~_;---'_--:--__ 248 . I I 2-48 -=L-'-+--'~ __ ~'--,---: . I . -=t.- CONOUITNIlRE GENERAL NOTES 1, S'I"S'IDl GROUNOlNG WIRES NOT SHOWN IN CONDUIT I WIRE SClEDUlE. INSTAll PER COOE. CONlJUITNIlRE SCHEDULE NOTES (11 INST~PULlROPE (2) EMPTY (31 CAP CONDUIT ATUMlT OF CONSTRl.ICllOO (4) SCHEDULE 80 PIC ~ ~ I 20 ~ 0 21) 40 I.... ......... ---...J SCALE "FEET Pa..E POLE POLE Lt.I.IlNAJRE LlIM1IWRE CIRCUIT STATION OFFSET HEIGHT ARM TYPE NO, P61+13.lIO 36SRT. ~~- ---f ::::=~ 3-2 .. -- --,1'--= __~ l00.woecoAATM _m~ P6&+29.oo 17.aLT. IT 4' -lIJG.WDECORATIVE 3-1 ---- --. 1T - ~-.- "1oow-OECiJAATiVE ~-_.- --~--'-'--------- 316 PlIlNO.OO 36.S'RT. --,T ~- 1OO-WOECORATM 3--2 ----"~- ------ lT -.;--- ~wDEO:3RArM ---- - ..------- p6Q'1a,1lCl 17.alT, IT -~ lQO.WDECORATIVE 3-1 --11-'- 4' lCJO.WOECORATM --.---- .-.------.~ P~23.DO 17,O'lT. \7'--- "i-- 11JO.WOECOAATM 3-2 - ---- ~ -iTu -'..--- l00.WDECOAATM:: -,_.~ p 159+65.00 ]6,S'RT. IT 4' 1QC}.W DECOAATM 3-2 -----" ~--~ -f"'--- 'IQo.W-riCOAATM P1Q+l1.fX) 17_aLT. 1T 4' 1QO.WOE:COAATlVE 3-1 LUM. NO. 314 '" 311 318 319 '" LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE ~ exeltech Olympia. w. SNltle, W;J Portl~, OR ....... W LOCHNER PH~~EU NOTES ~-+-----,- -'--- 24MII - ~ . i2-12~____ ,- J2.i2243111 - Washington State Department of Transportation GENERAL NOTES I. ORIENT JUNCTION BOXES 1-3 SHOWN ON THE PlANS AND DETAILS 2. TREE WEl1. JlJNCTION BOXfS SHAlLSE lNSTAU.EO PER O€TAlLS 1.2,3,4,5,&600 SHEETED4. 1 SEE OWG. EO' FOR TREE WEll lOCAtiON TABlE AND JUNCT:;JN BOX TABlE 4, SEE DWG. ED2 FOR SINGlE tiNE DIAGRAM_ S. SEE iNIG. E04 AND ED5 FORSIOf\o'iAlJ<. POLE, JUNCTlOO BOX AND OBINET FOUhDATION DETALS. 6. SYSTEM GROlIIDING WIRES 1-101 SHOWN IN COODUIT I 'MRE SCHEOOlE. INSTALl PERCOOE. 7, INSTAll 1. 'l DIAMETER PMPTY CONDtJIT IN ALL ILLUMINATION Rt.tLS EXCEPT RUN NO.1, 2. If, 13, 26, 29, 33 AND :19. CONSTRUCTION NOTES (j) CONSTRUCT FOUNOA TION AT STA noN AND CENTERLINE OFFSET SHQYd.j, SEE CIlY OF BREMERTON STANDARD DWG. 7014, EXCEPT USE ~ ANCHOR BOlTS PER POlE MANUFAt,TURER'S RECOMMENOATlONS. RmNlSH AND INSTAll. DECORATM: STEELUGHT STANDAADAND LlJMlNAlRES. FURNISH AND INSTAll. TYPE 1 JUNCTION BOX WACEHT TO STANllAfID PEROWG, ED3. DETAILS " 2, 3, 4&5APPROPRlATE TO ~ S1QEWAU< CONDITIONS FURNISH AH) INSTAll. TYPE I JUNCTION BOX /.DJACENT TO TREE WELLPERQWG. ED3. DETAIL 6, FlJRNISHANEllNST.-u IAAlNLINE CCffi)UlT AND WIRE INTO JLR'lCTION BOX PER WlRJNG SCHEDVlE. COIl 3 FEETOFWlRE IN EACHJUNCTlONBQX (j) LEGEND EXISTING NEWmOCATED "J---{j COORA HEAD LIGHT STMIDARD ~' ~ DECORATMUGHTSTANOARD ~ CoaRAHEAOLlJ,4ll-WREONSlGNAlPOlE 0<>fI 0--0'--0 EXlSTlNG Bre LIGHTING POlE ~ JUNCTION aox, TYPE 1 ~ WCllON BOX, TYPE 2 CONDUIT NolD WIRING ~-J ElECTRICAl SERVICE CABINET ~ r.i':; TREE WEU IT'] tm.ITY HAJrlOHOlE GCA-4924 Supplement No.1 Exhibit F Sheet 3 of 4 SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEDESTRIAN! BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS OIU""ooc, -" IL4 IllUMINATION PLAN 13~ ~8(. GENERAL NOTES SEC. 13, T.24N., R.1E. W.M. LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE POLE POlE UlMlNAlRE llJMIW.JRE CIRCUIT OFFSET !-EIGHT ARM TYPE NO 1T ... 1CJO.WOECORA.TIVE ~ '4.0' RT. iT f- - ',oo:..Y OECOAATM 3-2 -_. -;;;- ~-- ---;'-- ~::=: -;; --- ~~RT.~ ._-:;- '--Y-'- ~::=: 3-1 m.lI'RT. --1r"-- =:J.~ ,~_ DEOORA.TM 3-2 _J!...__ of' l00.WDECORATl\IE ~ __.--i.- ~oECORATh'E 3-2 _.. . -~T.. ...' __ 100-WDEalRATIVE -- .---- -'rF--- n f' 100-WOECORATIVE 25.5'lT. -""i'r- ~~ loo.WCECORATIVE 3-1 rr' -. _..-;nm '100.WOCCORATJIIE a.O'RT IT of'" 100-WDECOAATlIIE 3-1 25.5'LT. '-fr-~ --4;"--- 1QO.W~T1VE 3-1 .~r= ~~I= ~::~~ --.- 25.5'LT. 1r 4' 100-WOECQflATJ\IE 3-1 lUlT. --~~_.~ -~~L t~~~;;_ _._x~~_ ..~ 4' loo.wOECORATM 59O'RT. 1T --'i---' 100..WOECORATNE WSF uz-'--- -,ooo:.WSTCliJw 155'RT. 35' -~i---' 1OCG-W8TClU!.i- WSF 'I "lCOO-W8TC.WW' 35' 1-' llXJl}.'N8TCLUY WSf . u,:[ "~:I""r .'; LEGEND A N I 1. ORIENT JUNCTION BOXES AS Sl-ICl'Ml ON THE PlANS.IHJ DEl AILS. 2. mEEWEU.JL/NCTION80XES SlWJ.8EINSTAUEDPER DETAILS 1.2.3,4.5.& 8 ON SHEET ED4. EXlSTlNG NEWIRELOCATEO '..>-----;.:;: C08RA HEAD LIGHT ST,&NOAA[) -, "..":' .:},.....() DECORATIVE UGfIT STANDARD ~ COBRA HEAD ltMt<WRE ON SIGNAL POLE :::J----<.---G EXISTING BTC llGHTlNG POlE 3. SEE tmG. ED1 FOR TREE WEt.lLOCATION TABLE ANDJUNCTlON BOX TABIL 4, SEEOWG.E02FORSlHGLELJM:DIAGRAM 5. SEE OWG. E04 Am ED5 FOR SJOEWAI..K, POlE. JUNCTION BOX AN) CABINET FOUNDATION DETAILS. ft. SYSTEM GROI.IN:lINQ WIRES NOT ~ IN CONDUIT IV/IRE SCHEDUlE. INSTAll PER CODE_ 7. INSTALL I - Z" DWETER PMPTY CONDUIT IN ALl UUMlHATIOO RUNS EXCEPT RUN NQ.1, 2, 11, 13,25,29, 3300 3~. a COORDINATE ll.n.llNAJRE ST.AN::Wttl RaOCATION X212, X213 WrTtI WSf. JUNCTIONOOX,TYPE1 JUNCTlON80X,lYPE2 CONDUIT AND WIRING ~'i~.:; Et..ECTRICAL SERVICE CABINET l6: " .-,:- TREE WEll E.;} llTlLlTY HOOHCll 20 , 20 ~ SCALf IN FEET ., m_~ CONSTRUCTION NOTES (2) CONSTRUCT FWNCATION A.T STATICN AHO CEN'TERLrNE OFFSET SHCmN. SEE CITY OF BREMERTON STANDARD OWG. 7014, EXCEPT use 4 ANCHJR BOLTS PER ?OlE MANUF,f,CTIJP.ER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. fURNISH AND INST...u. DECORATIVE STE.El. UGfiT STm:wm AN{) LUMINAIRES. FURNISH AND INSTAll TYPE 1 JUNCTlON 80X ADJACeNT TO STANOAfU) PERDWG. 8)4, DETAILS 1, 2. 3. 4l5~TE TO ADJACENT SIDEWALK CONDITlONS CD FURNISH AND lNST All TYPE I JUNCiION BOX .o\OJACEHT' TO TREE WEll PERQWG. ED4 OfT"rul, FURNISH,&,ND ltolSTAU. UA.lNUNE CONDUIT ANOWIRE INTO JUNC110N BOX PER WIRING SCHED\A.E. COIL 3 FEET Of WIRE IN EACH JUNCTION BOX @ RELOCATE EXISTING BREMERTON TRANSPORTATlON CENTER (BTC) L\.R.lINAJRE POLE. LW1NAIRE CAMERAAND SPEAKER TO NEW FOONlMTlON. E.XTEND CONDUIT, SPEAAER. CAMERA.,.AND IUUMINATlONCAflLES TO EXIST1NG BTCCONTRQI.. PANELS ANtI SERVICE @ RElOCATE EXISTING BRE~ERTON ~SPORTATION CENTER (BiC) LUUlNAlRE POlE AND lUMltwRE m GATE ISlAAlO """""" GCA-4924 Supplement No. I Exhibit F Sheet 4 of 4 RE1.OCATEFROMT22+10,1.O'RT. Rll< ....... COI.wT /::" SIZE 26 1.5" 27 1.5" " . " IS 20_ _~__ .3J . " . SERVICE NO. 1 llUMIHATION mEEUGHT CIRCUIlS(24fN) CmCUlTS(12OV) -,-:;-'-------,:2--- 1-~.'-T-1:a-- SERVICE NO. 3 -UtiUNArUN- --.- TfiEEiIGHT--- R['-<<)TE NOTES ClRCUrTS(24CV) ClRCUITS(12fN) _ PHOTOCELL 3-1 ! 3-2 3-A 13-B :-.j:C- ,... , ''''__L=-. .-.:. _~_ :__' '0" 248!. - I . . .~:; ~.~~ffJI RElOCATE FROM 38+50, 74/1 L T, . -+-=---'- i~ ~ /,-,,,'C AC'4'_S/':<t ~~Y~t'<~\ . (' ~.:... -"~~~ .. ~" ~">!>; J" "1.,,<';-,, ...."":~,',~J.!!.~~""~I.~ _~~In' LOCHNER ILLUMINATION PLAN ~ exeltech ~-, "w"'" SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEDESTRIAN! BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS IL5 ~.3'ZI :z~r:. ~~ .... "II Washington State Department of Transportation O'y.....I"~. W3 Snalll<l,.....8 PnrtlMd,OR Bremerton Tunnel Construction Cooperative Agreement GCA - 4924 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this A I':!.i? day of N0V6/"18E1<., -;<D06, between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation, hereinafter the "STATE," and the City of Bremerton, hereinafter the nCITY.1I WHEREAS, the CITY has designed a project for improvements to SR 304 entitled "SR 304 - Downtown Bremerton Pedestrian / Bremerton Transportation Center (BTC) Access Improvement Project," hereinafter the "PROJECT," located from M.P. 2.79 to M.P. 3.01, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the STATE will be the lead agency for the construction of the PROJECT, but the CITY will participate in the construction process as further provided herein, and WHEREAS, the CITY also has plans to construct a project entitled, "Combined Sewer Outfall," hereinafter the "CSO," as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT, within the same footprint as the PROJECT and scheduled for construction at the same time as the PROJECT, and WHEREAS, the CITY will direct the PROJECT design consultant to incorporate the CSO work into the construction design of the PROJECT under a separate group and at no cost to the STATE, and WHEREAS, since a mutual benefit in cost savings, through economy of scale and other efficiencies, will be derived by both the STATE and. CITY by incorporating the CSO work into the PROJECT, the STATE agrees to construct the CSOat the San:le time as the highway PROJECT, and WHEREAS, the CITY is obligated for the cost of CSO work described in Exhibit A, NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to RCW 47.28.140 and chapter 39.34 RCW and in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. GENERAL 1.1 The STATE agrees to construct the CSO work at the same time as the highway PROJECT. 1.2 Plans, specifications and cost estimates shall be prepared by the CITY for the CSO work in accordance with the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, and amendments thereto, ("Standard Specifications") and adopted design standards, unless otherwise noted. The CITY's consultant will incorporate the CSO plans and specifications into the STATE's PROJECT. The STATE will thereafter advertis~ the resulting PROJECT for bid and, assuming bids are received and a contract is awarded, administer the contract. GCA - 4924 Page 1 of8 1.3 Warranty: The STATE's contract will include a bid item titled '..cso Warranty" specifying that the STATE's contractor will provide to the CITY, an agreed upon warranty for all associated CSO work performed under the contract. The STATE shall not be a party to this warranty. The CITY agrees that all actual direct and related indirect costs associated with the bid item "CSO Warranty" shall be the sole responsibility of the CITY. 1.4 The CITY hereby approves the CSO work shown in Exhibit A. 1.5 The CITY may, if it desires, furnish an inspector on the contract or CSO work. Any costs for such inspector will be borne solely by the CITY. All contact between the CITY and the STATE's contractor shall be through the STATE's representative. The STATE's representative shall have final authority for any and all decisions affecting the STATE's contract, including the CSO work shown in Exhibit A. 2. AWARD OF PROJECTIDELETION OF WORK 2.1 Following bid opening, the STATE shall provide the CITY with one (1) copy of the apparent low bidder's bid. The CITY shall have fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of receipt, or two (2). calendar days from notification by the STATE or United States Environmental Protection Agency, hereinafter USEP A, that the apparent low bidder has metUSEP A' s Women and Minority Business Enterprise requirements, whichever is longer, to review and provide the STATE with the CITY's written concurrence of award or rejection of said bid. In the event the CITY rejects the bid the STATE shall delete the CSO work covered by this AGREEMENT from the STATE's contract. Should the CITY fail to respond as provided herein, the. STATE shall delete the CSO work from the contract. 2.2 Should the CITY exercise its option to delete the CSO work or should the CITY fail to accept or reject the bid within the time provided under Section 2.1, the CITY agrees, upon receipt of a STATE" invoice therefore, to reimburse the STATE for any and all engineering and administrative costs incurred by the STATE in deleting, from the STATE's contract, the CSO work covered by this AGREEMENT. 2.3 The ST ATE shall make the final determin!ltion as to appropriateness of any bid with regards to the Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction and regarding the practices, policies and procedures of the Washington State Department of Transportation and reserves the right, should the STATE deem it necessary, to reject any and all bids for the PROJECT and/or the CSO. 3. CHANGES TO WORK 3.1 Changes to the contract will be documented by change order as defined in the current edition of the Standard Specifications. 3.2 Required change orders in~olve such changes in quantities or alterations in the CSO work or CITY -owned facilities as are necessary to satisfactorily complete the work as determined by the STATE. All other change orders shall be considered elective. The STATE shall process all required GCA - 4924 Page 2 of8 change orders in the manner as set forth in subsection 1-2.4C(3), Approval of Changes, ST ATE . Construction Manual, current edition. 3.3 The CITY herein authorizes the STATE to initiate, negotiate, document and execute all required change orders. 3.4 The STATE will advise the CITY of any proposed required change order affecting the CSO or other CITY-owned facility and provide it with an opportunity, if time permits, to review the change order before execution. The STATE will determine the length of the review time based upon the need to expedite the change order to avoid delay to the PROJECT work. 3.5 Any elective change order affecting the CSO or other CITY-owned facility shall require the written approval of the CITY before execution. 3.6 The CITY may request additions to the CSO work through. theSTATE. The STATE will comply with the requested change, provided that the change complies with the Standard Specifications, contract permits, state and/or federal law and applicable rules and/or regulations and/or design policies. 3.7 The STATE will make available to the CITY all change ordeJ documentation pertaining to CSO work and other CITY-owned facilities impacted by the contract. 4. ACCEPTANCE OF CSO WORK 4.1 The CITY agrees, upon satisfactory completion of the CSO work, as part of the ST ATE's PROJECT contract, to deliver a letter of acceptance to the STATE which shall include a release and waiver of all future claims or demands of any nature resulting from. the performance of the CSO work under this AGREEMENT. . 4.2 If a letter of acceptance is not received by the STATE from the CITY within twenty (20) business days following STATE's completion notice to the CITY of the physical completion of the CSO work, said CSO work shall be considered accepted by the CITY and shall release the STATE from all future claims and demands of any nature resulting from the performance of the CSO work under this AGREEMENT. 4.3 The CITY may withhold this acceptance of the CSO work by submitting written notification to the STATE within the twenty (20) business day period. This notification shall include the reasons for withholding the acceptance. If these reasons cannot be resolved within forty (40) business days of the receipt of the CITY's notification, the outstanding issues will go to dispute resolution per Section}6 of this AGREEMENT. )~~ 5. REPRESENTATIVES 5.1 The STATE's PROJECT manager for the STATE's contract is: GCA - 4924 Page 3 of8 Howard Diep, P .E. Port Orchard Project Engineer 8293 Spring Creek RD SE Port Orchard, WA 98367-8192 360-874-3000 Fax - 360-874-3003 5.2 The CITY representative, acting as the CITY project coordinator, for the CSO work shall be: Ned Lever, P.E. CITY CSO Coordinator 3027 Olympus Drive Bremerton,VVA 98310 (360) 473-2398 Additionally, the CITY's representative providing technical expertise to the STATE for all other CITY facilities affected by the STATE's PROJECT shall be: Lynn Price, P.E. CITY Tunnel Project Coordinator 3027 Olyrnpus Drive Bremerton,WA 98310 (360) 473-5272 6. CITY SERVICES FOR PROJECT AND eso 6.1 The STATE may request, and the CITY may provide, CITY construction support services for the PROJECT, such as, providing ongoing project review, coordination with CITY services, and expert advice regarding design and/or construction details of the STATE's contract as it may impact CITY facilities. Such requests may be either written or verbal and the STATE agrees to reimburse the CITY for 100% of its actual direct and related indirect costs for said construction support services not related to the CITY's CSO work. Verbal requests will be followed up in writing. Any services provided by the CITY without written or verbal request of the STATE shall be at the CITY's expense. Billing for services provided under this sectio~shall be in accordance with section>>kand.MOfthis AGREEMENT. ~~~ ~~ 7~~ 6.2 The STATE may request, and the CITY agrees to provide, construction support services related to the CITY's CSO work. All CSO related services requested by the STATE and provided by the CITY shall be at 100% CITY expense. GCA - 4924 Page 4 of8 7. PAYMENT 7.1 The CITY, in consideration of the faithful performance of the eso work to be done by the STATE, agrees to reimburse the STATE for the actual direct and related indirect cost of the CSO work as shown in Exhibit A. The CITY will also reimburse the STATE for a percentage of the STATE's construction administration and engineering costs based on the ratio of the value of CITY work to all contract work at award. 7.2 The CITY agrees to make partial payments within thirty (30) days of receipt of a detailed STATE invoice to cover costs incurred. Payments are not to be more frequent than one (1) per month. It is agreed that any partial payment will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and that at the time of the final payment, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in.the final payment. 7.3 An itemized estimate of cost for the CSO work to be performed by the STATE at the CITY's expense is marked as Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. 7.4 In recognition of the cost savings to the CITY by the STATE's incorporation of the CITY's eso work in the STATE PROJECT, the CTIY agrees to pay for the actual direct and related indirect PROJECT costs identified as ineligible by the Federal Highway Administration. These costs are estimated at less than.five thousand dollars ($5,000). The CITY shall not be responsible for ineligible costs resulting from the sole negligence of the STATE. 7.5 The STATE, in consideration.of the faithful performance of services provided by the CITY, agrees to reimburse the CITY for the actual direct and related indirect cost of the work as described in Section.J.d":" fo~;/ 7.6 The STATE agrees to reimburse the CITY for STATE-requested services as provided under Section.~ ~.sT ATE agrees to make partial payments within thirty (30) days receipt of a detailed CITY in$'cHce. fhese payments are not to be more frequent than one (1) per month. It is agreed that any such 'payment will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and that at the time of the final payment, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in the final payment. 7.8 An itemized estimate of cost for services to be performed by the CITY at the STATE's expense is marked as Exhibit C, attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. 7.9 The CITY agrees to pay the STATE an advance payment amount of one hundred sixty-nine thousand four hundred sixty-three dollars ($169,463) within 20 days after the STATE submits its first partial payment request to the CITY. The advance payment represents approximately fifteen (15) percent of the estimate afeost and covers casts incurred by the STATE in the initial stages ofthe contract. The advance payment will be carried throughout the life of the contract with final adjustment made in the final payment. 7.10 In the event unforeseen conditions require an increase in the cost of 25 percent or more from that agreed to on either Exhibits B or Cor section.9-:4;'theyarties agree to amend this AGREEMENT to include such increase. 7, q eI' pi GCA - 4924 Page 5 of8 8. CLAIMS 8.1 Claims for Additional Payment 8.1.1 In the event the contractor makes a claim for additional payment for CSO work, the STATE will immediately notify the CITY of such claims. Such claims shall be made in the manner and form as provided for in the Standard Specifications. 18.1.2The CITY shall have the right to review and discuss the settlement of all claims. The ultimate decision to pay a claim will be by mutual agreement of the CITY and the STATE. In the event such claims are not resolved, the CITY shall defend such claims at its own cost and shall pay any court judgment or arbitration award resulting from such claims, provided that the CITY shall not be obligated to pay such claims or the cost of defense to the extent that the claims are caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the STATE in administrating the CSO work. The STATE will cooperate with the CITY in theCITY1s defense of the claim(s). The CITY shall reimburse any STATE costs incurred in providing such assistance. 8.2 Claims for Damages 8.2.1 After CSO work acceptance, in the event of claims related to the CSO work for damages or loss attributable to bodily injury, sickness, death, or.injury to or destruction of property, the CITY shall defend such claims and hold harmless the STATE, and the STATE shall not be obligated to pay any such claim or the cost of defense... Nothing in this section, however, shall remove from the STATE any responsibilities defined by the current laws.oftheState of Washington or from any liabilities for damages caused by the STATE's own negligent acts or omissIons independent of the CSO work performed under this AGREEMENT. 9. RIGHT OF ENTRY 9.1 The CITY hereby grants to the STATE, including its contractors and subcontractors, the right of entry upon alllarid which the CITY has interest, within or adjacent to the right of way of the highway, for the purpose of constructing and if necessary, maintaining said improvements. Upon completion of the work outlined herein, all future ownership, operation and maintenance of the CITY's facilitIes shall be at the sole cost of the CITY and without expense to the ST ATE. 10. MODIFICATION 10.1 No modification of this AGREEMENT is valid unless evidenced in writing by amendment to this AGREEMENT and signed by both Parties. No verbal agreement may supersede, replace or amend this AGREEMENT. GCA - 4924 Page 60f8 11. ASSIGNMENT 11.1 Neither Party to this AGREEMENT shall transfer or assign any right or obligation hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party. 12. SEVERABILITY 12.1 Should any section, term or provision of this AGREEMENT be determined to be invalid, the remainder of this AGREEMENT shall not be affected and the same shall continue in full force and effect. 13. HOLD HARMLESSIINDEMNIFICATION 13.1 Each party to this AGREEMENT shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless the other Party, its officers, officials, employees, and agents, while acting within the scope of their employment as such, from any and all costs, claims, judgments, and/or awards of damages (both to persons and/or property), arising out of, or in any way resulting from, each Party's negligent acts or omissions in connection with. the terms of this AGREEMENT. No Party will be required to indemnify, defend, or save harmless the other Party if the claims, suits, or actions for injuries, death, or damages (both to persons and/or property) is caused by the sole negligence of the Party. Where such claims, suits, or actions result from concurrent negligence offueParties, or is covered by RCW 4.24.115, the indemnity provisions provided herein shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Party's own negligence. 13.2 This indemnification shall survive the termination of this AGREEMENT. 14. DISPUTES 14.1 In the event that a dispute arises under this AGREEMENT that cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of both Parties, with regards to the CSO work and other CITYMowned facilities, it shall be resolved as follows: The CITY and STATE shall each appoint a member to a disputes board, these two members shall select a third member not affiliated with either Agency. Costs related to the third member will be equally shared between the CITY and STATE. The decision made by this board shall be final and binding on the Parties to this AGREEMENT. GCA - 4924 Page 7 of8 15. VENUE 15.1 In the event that either Party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the Parties hereto agree that any such action or proceedings shall be brought in the superior court situated in Thurston County, Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written. CITYO~TO~ By: ~y: Cary Bozeman, Mayor STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION /~&.~ f Randall A. Hain, Region Administrator Date: II.. z. . 0 f.- APPROVED~FORM Date: /0 --;<~ -tJ~ APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:~ CITY Attorne By: Date: /ohQ~~ / / Date: GCA - 4924 Page8 of8 Assistant Attorney Genera fa - ';) - 0 'r GCA-4924 Exhibit A Page 1 of 5 Description of W orle The Combined Sewer Outfall line will install 1,163 feet of36 inch pipe and 418 feet of 48 inch pipe from the intersection of 4th Street and Park Avenue to 15t Street and Pacific Avenue in the City of Bremerton. It includes associated manholes, shoring, excavation, backfill and erosion control work. The work will also include the installation of a 12 inch storm line at the intersection of 4th Street and Park Avenue and pavement restoration on Parle Avenue from Burwell Street through to 4th Street. lTI' " ~..,;mr;~"""'; ! lU' Z. I i I ~ ~. B i : -7 < : :, ''';':>C' I . . 'l'_j~: R I ; . ~ I ~ ~ G ! : (Z!, c.".;., ,'':' I ! i ,,@t...J(in, E : (.l';i .\ -" ''I I)' I I ! ~ I \, ! ./j I ; I " ,,', ................/]' . ! , ! '0, ..: . .. ...., : / .t.. .--~ I. .-r' "" fl.. ~ j @ , .. .-' . "._.... _'.. """'n. ",. I H,',~ .1.. ! ;_"~I'~~:;~----;--";"..." .. .....:".!."".;;.,::.... ".. ..~.l V:) i I '~.".,"-\ ~,""""-.-'. ....::~, -p. !;\N-\.Il'lE ,."--~"..;; "'~~;~'l e':1', ,@ \.. ...--...~-:. .:/:,,':;'~:(.=-_~~..":-:--i '.. ............. ..........., t. ~. r .,. r -",." ~'~.....,,,.,,...,,..,,.., '-,..................k~.".'.,....~.".."._...."..... ".. ":in .t}~-~=~=- ~1,'~~~~:i:f:~'-_~j3~=~~==-~jl I ~ :'. ;' .. ~. \'", aURWClLSTREET . '\\ I' : i _. , , .\ ~ .. '1 J .--- "';'r-s" -'/t t~~''''~=-:-~-~ '\-:---\. "f.~'~ 'r-:1~:-~-",:-'~- ~'1''''- ~~...-..._~_._. , "1 .0'.. 'r' ".. .-. ... . "-'-,\\--'-- -., ...... '.. :,,': . tf..u. . I ..,.n.... .,. n / _ .If \ . . , . \ \ ., " '. . . \ .\ . J- --~-. ~ ,t -.... -.-..-..--'--------.-.----.--~--:::::1---.[~. ..--.--n-~---,-----...._.-,..,..,._.._. --'--__"___ __ ...u_. '__"1 :.:; ."~. .-;' (45) j' \ r .. ... '0. L... .1.\ . . . \.., . ..~:;. . . .-,.. ILl' ,..J. \ , ,=". @)'.., '~Ol '(~:d\ ~.J J ~ (~) ;:.~, \~ 'si '__ . .... I .(J~) rJ~}. l::.. '1;:............. r r I.. -----".. . _,:I;~:..7-.\ ..:'~.,~r.\~.... _..... ._~ ",' . '.. . .:'\'.';' '1!2\.. I t~n,~ <' /fr; ,I: '1'.. ,:!)~'. . j ~~---or~.f,,: ',.! --'~"f<; " ....~... 2.'...-~:.::_-1 I. "Y"{' '. .1'" ,..,.......-.1 i ')':" Ii, . , , ." "'1 ,. I 12-'} : .' .~. '." ;"1. , ;""..:'" ~; I . .! i . .; j & J " . .Ll_t.___~U . .;~i~: ;~'l.'~...~ I t; ~ d ;;hte.Dwior< 0......... ... ... a" Ou J -... ... ""'W..f 0.1....., &r LIJQ\l ...., ........... t. "'-"'~" _rt>itKtr..;.dlJli.l "'It """"" l. ! N ~ .....".,.,., LEGEND ~.i.i':""_p.J;.;:It~ifn. ~ C) ::Hil..... ::.::-;'.1.:I.:!:~~I.;.; ~::tH.~;~ 7','F~ I, 'f'! ~ \.:J ~~ Lo-.:.:f 'Jil. "7iri:11. A..'l.l:i~l :.,,;j~11~i;H '~;;'N:-fll.f ;\i:A\C1tolN t:xl::nstJ' &~;htlrJ!..f:. GCA-4924 EXHIBIT A Sheet 2 of 5 ~_ui t ---r .:t....,!?' '1':.\ ~ u 1-.utl.1 - DRAIWlGE PLAlIS SR 3M DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEDESTRIANI BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS -r ~ 01 - W~ W..hlnulon BlalD ..... nDplll'tmonl of T......porl.Uon AI ....... exeltech '--r."A ____~ ~~ 811 ",""0 n I I.. I! ". :"" ',,-, t r- ::"'~-~i;:l ~!I I l' r,;;'G.:'l ' ,., I. . , l. 8(.,: ' . .~p \:: / : i (~4;) ,........._ U,Vc"" . '. '. '. ,/ __ ,L"J"\..;:'.'Il', _,' ,......... ".,. _', .1,"'.,..1, . -, 1,-. )'; - .. .,} ,\:;.J / ~~ .....,.,.,...,-.......:-.._j~.f..~.,..., ,I.... t H 1 I. 1"::\ l.:;t'~, 1 r .. .... [f;- . ...... :.J( / ..1 t..::A '-' r.'''';I, ,: " .~. }' '"'. 4~ -'oJ~' ..!... ._~.~\~......~_,_._~ __~..... !. ' t .....!~l: ....~.:~..I~-2-,...... .,;.-:..,;,~ic-. _.\ '''I'. __ - jr' __.[..u...__~_.I_..... --C...i...---.-.---~~ 'it!f ",t\i.i<__~~ .. - -~~'~~"::?~':"':"'~"::'.. .,.,c-:;.~rs:'::"--(i~.:~':'-"~":~."..':.~:r)~~:",~.".;-'cc"c'''':'~:,,~i I .,.......' c,j."" 11): I a.L1NE"" 1'.0-,)0' ; ':...' j." ;.5-!" ~ ,.". I 'r' =~"oa ""-E}-" -':'._.' ...:-:-.... _ . -:;":',!;.t ' UAWElLSTREET' 1 .~," ,.,. i~7'.~.~--::'.~;' .._>/~7.'{:."~-~~:"::~>.':.~.. ~~:;~~;;'~~i;;~~..___..__~~..~~_~~_'_..:__~-~',.' ... 1- ..!.5'.~ .... I, I r... ,"" ..1'.1\) .:_.._~:...._ \t~., ......... I \~~. '-2:/!' " ....... .....;:,.:...;~"'..;:)1.-/'.~..;::..__--m.. ..---......""..... ..._..--~~~~":-., .>:..l~.::.~,....:_..~.__. ""- ~V. "".: ~.:.~:,,~.. ,eo".' ...,,:;,~ " '< ;,.~.zv,'-~ " .,~. '}. !' i .. ;~ :\ ,; " '~...... " '~~,. r ,..,i.:1c.;...!~~..:.u1~1' I' /'.J,-~,,,',..:...:<,'-,, .~. if i! I~"''''' " '~.. '\ - ~:..... I' .'. ~I'.I~ ~ ~ .... ,. hlJ",r;-ll'l, " .~~ " '.~" ::'1 ~ '\.... \ {,;. .~\, . '<. (tJ \..... ." '",. " ~--tl71 :i!,: ~ ...~.:. , r-.~:.. /#~::..I ^ '';, \ ',.:: .' ~ ~:, ..:::.. '~;;. f~t;>ft..i...a...tHI".-! \ ":\ "~..' :i:. \ ":. '-: ",;.,'. : i ~ ~ \ '::. \, ';':'. \ ! i z ~<::.:;.. \.';::::;:::.. :; ~;~. \\" \. .;.... (?,;),'j ~ %;::\:\ \:~\-V~~_!l.. i~__ ~~__.;_____ ~-rAlli. r (ltl1~ , r. !' r~ ; I ,.' ,;.- ii !~I: i I Iii WI ~ I ~ -----l' ~~i-it;iil; 6 ~=:"'~l~(,",,' "'.tIn ..,t.alft JO.......~R..~ ~l.... P, L IlORQS loIl"Ido.PII..',t,r. ....-.''-'It., ku.llld~r.,l .$1,ur nn. M) ft1ItQI. HQ. ~ - ~ Wuhlnstan atat. ~, Dapartmont af Tran1port.otJan ,. ........... exeltech ...-t.... ~""" ~~ "''''... '" -. ~- :rViil..", ] i~'!?) I . ~. /.{ ,r'" :.r~) ..... "., ., ::. .~... ),.--. ~ t ! N ~ L~9~N[) 1:1' C.WC"'i if~:'J~~ :Yf'l( , ~) SlQ~M EEWt:~ r'~10i () !;S'JMH, rlPll. '~!!'. i''rF:.1I ..; (0 CJ .:':.,;hti~~l t ~l~T'H;j U;.,,'j.K1J: En.I~h't i:r~/l:l'l~~:~t .:i7;~tl( 'L-Rr Pl;l{; E- ~.i:.H'.~ i-'!j'c GCA-4924 EXHIBIT A Sheet 3 of 5 SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEOESTRIANI BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS "'" - 02 ORAlNAGE FV.N5 I t; '" '" '" I ci Z:Bo...~t,.., Q ---..... 8f C. tltri J ~~ lJr RNIXIU: Qn.... L BUflQJ lI] ." ."'n' II r . ...-.... .........'.~I 290 .u, ."""" :..~:.Jf.l'o1:l'C~.u -,-- % \ 'I.' ,Ii , \ ~ ~ . _ i \.,}g7---1 ... .'ifJ:. % . (i(\' . ':..'. 81' \\:.;./ iP' 'I .. /."" I ~ \i '* ~.. L~ : ~l\'" _...J ,\ I" . -y" \\ ,-- -- - -.-- -.. "--.. (~\i' 7'" % \ % , \ , " ~ ~ jJ!) :F @ II: 'l .\f!:l./ ,,:' ~i'.~ ...., :C"~~_. ~~ ";.,;;'~'.!I,''''ir:i! S.llNE SECOND STIlE!:T ~_\: 1___l" ..CH.i:l!';h:!1 rm. AID Pta:U. ..:J. exeltech ..-,.1111'" __ _DI'I .. ...... ~ - ;m:;" Wuhlnslon Sial. ." D.par1m8nt ofTl'1InapartatJon olD8tu.1." or _D Ut!i:; .............-- ... :".1 ! ~ ii A N .~ LE(iEND (i_~) ::,i 1:.!,I!.:H C,;~!~f-Il'r'l'~ , ." t.lt-i. ~"''''I: II {2] ~=M!l'/E O;:..':,I~b"GE 31~!.,l!:'::. i~:: .... .' .... ..:::. :i'"i~iW :JE\\~H i:!:.:Wl GCA-4924 EXHIBIT A Sheet 4 of 5 SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEOESTRIANI BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS -p . D3 ORAJ//AGE PLANS ,/ // ~~,):\ .. .o'~:L~) "\'K\ 1;;;0- '-'. . . ~~~a~.. .,~! 1.<;, ,<...... .;. .~~. " '\. .-.... . '; )~5l "" ;..; .,1 '''-'W . 4\...~~a~} . '-"'j "'.. ~ ,. ~. '. A N I .;.: ~ . '." ;; '.i ,.'..:tn. 1i ),rfl.f' .. "'\~ ~::) . I ~ on I a..... .~..... ......vy'.., ,/' ,/' /' ./'. -~../' ../" Lg(;g~!P .........------i-. .,.:..~ LATCH ~~~l:i iYI;-E 1 r..5(J:.'II.I~'PC I ~Ilt. 7'iPE II. (:!) H;'~IR:~~.-;E~';"Er.I~I>:~l r;l; >,. ;jJ E'J o ( AfJJL'~j f ~:iSiISu M:'JIHI;.lf' .~r:~snrj~l E."J~ T1~ltj t.t.A.tIHC:tE ,'{JJ:..l~T ~)<IS1'I!~~ tAil.....' 8/-.51'-' FiEMO'Jf lirt.;l~.;.GE 5JHUC.l'Wfi: rLlI~E.&15(t.r:I:,?1?( GCA-4924 EXHIBIT A Sheet 5 of 5 l,:.,:, r----' ..;.~----...r ~"';I'I;'I..; o =1lo'....~lIof;r 8!11-,"- .., . COlI'4 J 0-...... ..Il~ ~ .. LOCflO.1 UI .""'iMlIC..,.. ""--"-III' ~K1 ..:;... JIAlt: rm. .100 I'ftO,t. 1Cl. ~ D4 JDI.....,.. exoltec:h "-._ --..... .....c.. - ::7: W..hlngton Btale "" Department at Tranlpo,uU.n SR 304 DOWNTOWN BREMERTON PEDESTRIANI BTC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS ":f 10 _AStt. DRAlIlAGE PLANS o..t .M><>t .. .".~ GCA - 4924 Exhibit B Downtown Bremerton Pedestrian/BTe Access Improvements Canslnlcl/an Ellllmalo STD ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTlON PREPARATION 0001 MOBILIZATION 7%1 0049 REMOVING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE STORM SEWER I UNrr I UNIT PRICE L.S. EACH $ 3091 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 3151 TESTING STORM SEWER PIPE 3577 SCHEDULE A STORM SEWER PIPE 121N. OIAM. HOPE OR 32.5 STORM SEWER PIPE 36 IN. DIAM. Sea CSOl HOPE OR 32.5 STORM SEWER PIPE 48 IN. DIAM. See CSOl STRUCTURE DEWATERING L1aUID ASPHALT 5334 ANTI-STRIPPING ADDITIVE HOT MIX ASPHALT 5711 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 57riT HMA CL 112 IN. PG 64.22 5630 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT 5835 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING 6403 ESC LEAD . 6470 STREET CLEANING 6373 SILT FENCE 1i478 STRAW BALE 1i490 EROS10NIWATER POLLUTION CONTROL TRAFFIC 6051 PlASTIC CROSSWALK LINE 6082 RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER TYPE 1 3884 RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER TYPE 2 INTERCONNECT 6971 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL 6992 OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL LABOR 6974 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPERVISOR OTHER ITEMS 7006 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS B INCLUOING HAUL 700B SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION ClASS B 7013 GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR PIPE BEDDING 7014 GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR DRAIN 7360 MANHOLE 481N. DIAM. TYPE 1 7364 MANHOLE 60 IN. OIAM. TYPE 3 7365 MANHOLE 72 IN. ClAM. TYPE 3 7366 MANHOLE 84 IN. DIAM. TYPE 3 CONSTRUCTION FENCING 7736 SPCC PLAN Sul>- Telal CenslrucUan > ",. ..., "', ,<Co .' Salus TaX.'; ... '. . ." . ..""';'....,. Ccn.truct/onEn~lneilril1ll Ce.1s 10%1. Cilillilriict/iiiliii:cillIliii'i!iicv..I,10%1..,.",., c..' .....,,:....::.;7::'.:;,"'2..;;':'.':,':.:,,:,..,. ......"..:,. AdmlnlsltilllVe',Oii6rtiona: ,n",: .. .' . . '. . . ",' '~', ::.;: '~...:;,':,::',:.r:.~.:;~,:-;;':,~J~~I'.;,;:r-, ~!;'.:.'; . - -'.: '. ,..: " . TQ.fu(/C'~~~lhIltii~~~:;~~>ii .~ .. NOTE: (1) po, Overhead Agrnomonl OH..(}0166 Clly 110m' E.limolo 9.7-06. Rovised EACH S LF. $ LF. S L.F. S L.F. S LS. S EST. S S.Y. $ TON S CALC $ CALC $ DAY $ HR S L.F. $ EACH S EST. $ SF 5..- HUND $ HUND S LS. $ LS. $ HR $ L.S. $ C.Y. $ S.F. S c.Y. $ c.Y. $ EACH $ EACH $ EACH $ EACH $ L.F. $ L.S. $ . . .. '. ....."'..:.'...,:...,,.,.;.'., ..,::,;;..... '. ........ . ,,". ...,'...,.... ... .....:..... " 1.000.00 2.500.00 2.00 50.00 325.00 400.00 250.000.00 150.00 125.00 4.00 5.00 100.000.00 12.00 250.00 600.00 32.000.00 430.000.00 50.00 125.000.00 CSO (In Slme Right olW.yl GROUP 3 OTY AMOUNT 80 80 1.00 10.00 65.00 1.00 1.00 16.00 340 S 2.50 1193 $ 25.00 111 $ 25.00 228 $ 4.000.00 4.000.00 4.200.00 4.500.00 10.00 5.000.00 .".' .,., ..... ...... ":..::: ":.' GCA-4924 . . '.': S $ S .... . is. .'" $ 3.434.03 $ S 32.000.00 5.440.00 2.982.50 2.775.00 5.700.00 62.,4111;53 4.409.29 '.: '.'..'. 5,249.15 : 524MS .$ 67,399.12: CSO GROUP 4 OTY AMOUNT 160.00 1 1,579 77 1.163 338 o 190 1700 $ 187 $ 370 S 230 S 10 S 25 S 250 $ 5 $ 0.1 $ 166 $ 0.9 S 0.3 $ 0.00 $ 0.04 S 100.00 S 0.04 $ 3668 S 15467 S 1.500 $ 2.490 $ 1 $ 4 S 1 S 1 S 250 S 0.04 S ...~ ..,. ". QTY TOTAL AMOUIIT S $ 57.916.84$ 1.000.00 1 5 61.350.66 1.000.00 $ S S $ S 15 1659$ 775 11635.. 418'$ 2,500.00 3.158.00 3.650.00 377.975.00 135.200.00 2 500.00 3.3'( B.OO 3.850.00 377.975.00 1 riT.200.00 1 S 0.005 $ 190.00 :.190.: ,$. . .1BO.00 I....., . 17.000.0017.00 ;$ ..' ..17.000.00 12,155.00187: '$' .12.155,00 370.00 --370,'. .'5'.,. ".370.00 230.00 ,,230: :.$ :230.00 "".,.,.,.. ...., '.,... '. ":".'" .:.. ....".., "",c'::,:..:.' 1.500.00 i:10i:: '.$" '.',":::::UOO.OO 3.125.00 :,:25, i5'.:'.' . :3126.00 1.000.00 "250,': :$.': :', . ....1000.00 25.00 ":.;5;';:; i$,,".> '.;"';':.25.00 10,000.00 ',Oil0. i$.. ':10.000.00 ,;~..::' '.1.. :.:."..i';,.' :".':.'~;:,~r:; :;J.,,:.~:'-::>:~;'.';., .,:::, :-..:. f..', ' .~ ~"<"':'.:;;:: :.' 1,992.00 1."166'.' ;$'.;:;:.:::,':.;:::,:1.992.00 225.00 ,,-,,,,1':\' t$:,::,.:,.;~,:";:"c225;00 '~~i~!~~:;!:;;~~ .. ..." ;"" ~~~:~,~~ 38667.50 '16860 \'$,,:,,"::';:"~'i41;660;00 37,500.00 i.16m :.$....",':':-.'H40.276:00 62,250.00 :i27.18! ~$.t,1,:;:,.;'"~67.950.00 4.00D.00 ;':;',1'1,': r$':"X:~:"'~'4',OOO;OO 16.000.00 ".'.'4:'i" !5'.:.ei.:.,:,'.16 000.00 4,200.00 ":.~1:;::; <5'::";''''':'<.:4200,00 4.500.00 ;:';:\1W' ~$'::;"<',:::"!4;600;00 2.50D.00 '.:250'; ;:$":::";'.';:'.,:2;500.00 200.00 .:'0;04',1 IS;:;;':':":;':',,'i:2DO:OO '_'_~:,.':'~'::i,: p>;,'::;' ".':....:.:..'.. 885.297.14 ::..:'::'. ..,.... . :,,,,': ,.; ~ :'s,;.~'; :,: :937,788;66 ,$'" '."'. .,:' 4A09.29 , ..: ,-" ,. l,....~. $ $. . .. 08529.71; ." "" :S""'93778.87 ..""',,.;88'.529;1:1; :,,,:;~';:~, 1S;;S::"'!':,93;T16.87. . ..:'~:::'~ i~-,::'::<::~',~ :':\- '~:,;;:,:; ::'(-.I:..;':-":'';'~~:'-~~-:'l:~'7.' '.."1,:'::: ::~ ~~": ...".,:,.....,,;.,:..; ..:.'"T"';;. ..;".:,..:,,',',,;: ..', SO.OO '.,'. ..".:0'."';; ';;:....n','.';.;:.;;:;.,.,; """" $ '1;062,356;Si' ",'1'.' ;'$:.:1;129.755.68 Page 1 of 1 GCA-4924 EXHIBIT C Combined Sewer Outfall City Inspection Service and Coordination City coordination and technical expertise provided by the City of Bremerton at WSDOT request 0.75 Full Time Equivalent X 12 months X $7,000 I mo. 0.25 Full Time Equivalent X an additional 8 months X $7,000 I mo. $77,000.00 Administrative Overhead (1) $0.00 Total City Services $77,000.00 Note: (1) Per Overhead Agreement OH-00166 GCA-4924 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL BILL# 07 - 098_ SF DATE SUBMITTED: ........................................................................................ SUBJECT: Shelter Plus Care Program Annual renewal contract with Agape Unlimited, Project Sponsor Committee Meeting Date: April 25, 2007 COUNCIL MEETING Date: May 2, 2007 Department: DCD - HUD Programs Presenter: Betsy Howe Phone: 473-5211 SUMMARY: Since 1996, the City of Bremerton has acted as a pass-through agent for the Shelter Plus Care program administered locally by Agape Unlimited. Funded by the McKinney-Vento Act and administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Shelter Plus Care funds provide rental assistance for homeless individuals and families affected by mental illness, chemical dependency, or both. Participants receive assistance and counseling until they reach self sufficiency, which averages about two years. The City's contract with Agape is renewed annually, as is the City's contract with HUD. The City and Agape have received "renewal" status with HUD; therefore the annual application submitted is not awarded on a competitive basis but rather renewed provided performance criteria are met. Staff is requesting Council approval to renew the City's contract with Agape Unlimited. ATTACHMENTS: Contract between the City of Bremerton and Agape Unlimited. FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Pass-thru funding of$142,676.00 from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to Agape Unlimited, Project Sponsor. COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: CONSENT AGENDA I$- GENERAL BUSINESS 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 APPROV ALS: DEP ARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MA YOR: / RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the 2007 Service Agreement between the City of Bremerton and Agape Unlimited and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Wd~h St.<..bst-('.u,\'6.IIl\ '"the- same,. terMS (l,"Id QD(I.dl+WV\'3 o.s pr-egen\-ed. COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table D Continue D No Action DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM To: Bremerton City Council- DCD Liaison Date: Betsy Howe, CDBG/HOME Programs April 6, 2007 ~ From: Re: Shelter Plus Care Annual Renewal Contract This memo is intended to brief the Council Liaison for DCD of upcoming agenda items per new Council procedures. Aqenda Bill Title: Shelter Plus Care Annual Renewal Contract Summary: Since 1996, the City of Bremerton has acted as~_p""ass-through agent for the Shelter Plus Care program administered locally by Agape Unlimited. Funded by the McKinney-Vento Act and administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Shelter Plus Care funds provide rental assistance for homeless individuals and families affected by mental illness, chemical dependency, or both. Participants receive assistance and counseling until they reach self sufficiency, which averages about two years. The City's contract with Agape is renewed annually, as is the City's contract with HUD. The City and Agape have received "renewal" status with HUD; therefore the annual application submitted is not awarded on a competitive basis but rather renewed provided performance criteria are met. Staff is requesting Council approval to renew the City's contract with Agape Unlimited. Scheduled Dates: Study Session April 25th Council vote May 2nd Any questions or concerns please don't hesitate to contact me at 473-5211 1 AGENCY SERVICE AGREEMENT Shelter Plus Care Grant AN AGREEMENT, by and between the City of Bremerton hereinafter referred to as "City" and Agape, hereinafter referred to as "Agency" by which the Agency agrees to carry out specific activities under the City of Bremerton's Shelter Plus Care Grant Program and establishing certain other terms and conditions of operation. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I. PROJECT 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES The City, as recipient of a Shelter Plus Care Grant from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), hereby designates the Agency to undertake, and the Agency hereby agrees to undertake the activities specifically described in the applications and management procedures/plan and summarized below: Agency will provide affordable housing and a full range of services to homeless individuals who have chronic alcohol and drug problems. The continuum of housing linked to appropriate social services is designed to promote self-sufficiency and clean and sober living by providing gradually increasing levels of responsibili1:Y ""and independence based on personal progress in meeting recovery goals. Project based assistance will be provided with in accordance with grant number WA01C601032, to the City, to be renewed on July 1,2007 and executed on April 17, 2007. Tenant Based Assistance will be provided in accordance with grant number W AO 1 C60 1 031, to the City, renewed February 1, 2007, executed on April 17, 2007. The corresponding Sponsor Based application will be provided in accordance with grant number WA01C601030 to the City, renewed on February 1,2007 and executed on April 17, 2007. The Management Procedures/Plan (Attachment 1) outlines the management of the three programs. 2. TERM OF AGREEMENT The term of this Agreement is April 1, 2007 through January 31, 2008, determined by the specific grant, but may be extended pursuant to an amendment to this Agreement as authorized in Article IV.8, or should additional time for auditing this project be required, in accordance with law, this Agreement shall be deemed automatically extended until such time as the said audit shall be completed. In any event, the term of this Agreement shall cover the period that the Agency has control over Shelter Plus Care funds. 3. PROGRAM REPORTING The Agency shall submit such reports as required by the City to meet its local obligations and its obligation to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The City will prescribe the report format, as well as the time and location for submission of such reports. Required reports include but are not limited to the following: (A) Semi-Annual Performance Reports which shall include all information required by HUD in the final Annual Performance Report. (B) Annual Housing Quality inspections and rent reasonableness studies. ARTICLE II. FINANCIAL CONDITIONS 1. BUDGET AND COMPENSATION The City shall reimburse the Agency its allowable costs for the services identified in this Agreement not to exceed $ 30,720.00 (Thirty thousand, seven hundred twenty dollars) under project based assistance contract WAOIC601032, $78,208.00 (seventy eight thousand, two hundred eight dollars) under sponsor ba~e(L'kssistance contract W AO 1 C60 1 030 and $33,748.00 (thirty three thousand seven hundred and forty eight dollars) under tenant based contract W AO 1 C60 1 031 upon presentation of properly executed monthly invoices in a form approved by the City. Such reimbursement shall constitute full and complete payment by the City under this Agreement. Allowable costs shall mean those necessary and proper costs identified in the Agency's application and approved by the City unless any or all such costs are disallowed by the State of Washington or the United States. 2. DOCUMENTATION OF COSTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL REPORTING All costs shall be supported by documentation, as evidence of the nature and propriety of the charges. All accounting documents pertaining in whole or in part to this Agreement shall be clearly identified and readily accessible, and upon reasonable notice, the City and United States shall have the right to audit the records of the Agency as they relate to the work. The Agency shall also: (A) Maintain an effective system of internal fiscal control and accountability for all Shelter Plus Care funds, and make sure the same are used solely for authorized purposes. (B) Keep a continuing record of all disbursements by date; check number, amount, vendor, description of items purchased and line item from which money was expended, as reflected in the Agency's accounting records. (C) Maintain financial records for a period of five (5) years after receipt of final monitoring letter from the City provided that the Annual State audit (which includes the Shelter Plus Care Program) has been completed. (D) Permit inspection and audit of its records with respect to all matters authorized by this Agreement by representatives of the City the State Auditor or the United States at any time during normal business hours and as often as necessary. (E) Inform the City concerning any funds allocated to the Agency that the Agency anticipates will not be expended during the Agreement period, and permit reassignment of the same by the City to other agencies. (F) Repay to the City any funds in its possession at the time of termination of this Agreement that may be due to the City or the United States. 3. REIMBURSEMENT The City shall reimburse the Agency only for actualhlc..urred costs upon presentation of a properly executed invoice in a form approved by the City. Only those allowable costs directly related to the Agency's application, shall be paid consistent with Article II paragraph 2. In the event the City or United States determines any funds were expended by the Agency for unauthorized or ineligible purposes or the expenditures constitute disallowed costs in any other way, the City or United States may order repayment of the same. The Agency shall remit the disallowed amount to the City within thirty (30) days of written notification of the disallowance. (A) The Agency agrees that funds determined by the City to be surplus upon completion of the Agreement will be subject to cancellation by the City. (B) The Agency agrees that upon expiration of this Agreement, the Agency shall transfer to the City any Shelter Plus Care funds on hand at the time of expiration and any account receivable attributable to the use of Shelter Plus Care funds. (C) The City shall be relieved of any obligation for payments if funds allocated to the City cease to be available for any cause other than misfeasance of the City itself. (D) The City reserves the right to withhold payments pending timely delivery of program reports or documents as may be required under this Agreement. ARTICLE III. FEDERAL CONDITIONS 1. UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS Agency shall comply with regulations set forth in 24 CFR part 582. 2. CONFLICT OF INTEREST In addition to the conflict of interest requirements in 24 CFR part 85, no person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected official or appointed official of the Agency, who exercises any function or responsibilities with respect to the program or who are in a position to participate in a decision making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a financial interest or benefit from the activity, or have a financial interest in any contract, subcontract, or agreement with respect to the proceeds of the shelter plus care assisted activity either for themselves or those with whom they have business or immediate family ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. Participation by homeless individuals who also are participants under the program in policy or decision making under 24 CFR part 582.300 does not constitute a conflict of interest. 3. DISPLACEMENT, ACQUISITION RELOCATION, AND REAL PROPERTY The Agency shall comply with the requirements relating to displacement, relocation, acquisition and replacement of housing (24 CFR part 582.335). Displacement of persons (families, individuals, businesses, non-profit organizations and farms) as a result of activities assisted with Shelter Plus Care funds is generally discouraged and in all instances must receive prior written approval from the City. 4. LEAD BASED PAINT Agency shall comply with HUD Regulations on Lead Based Paint hazards in federally owned housing and housing receiving Federal assistance. (24 CFR Part 35) 5. DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED Under the activities, funded in whole or in part by Shelter Plus Care, Agency shall comply with 24 CFR part 582.330. ARTICLE IV: GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Agency, in performance of this Agreement, agrees to comply with all applicable Federal, State and Local Laws and ordinances, and the rules and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, including but not limited to Shelter Plus Care Regulations and other policies and guidelines established for the Shelter Plus Care Program regardless if the law is specifically stated in this Agreement. 2. LICENSING AND PROGRAM STANDARDS The Agency agrees to comply with and to obtain at its own expense, if necessary, all applicable Federal, State, County or Municipal standards for licensing, certification and operation of facilities and programs, and accreditation and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Contract to assure quality of serVIces. 3. INSURANCE The Agency shall maintain at all times a policy of comprehensive general liability insurance providing an amount of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence, _prQt~cting the City of Bremerton from any and all damages which may arise in connection with the services to be provided hereunder, whether or not such damages are alleged to arise from acts or omissions which are the sole negligence of the City, its officers, employees, and or agents, or the combined negligence of the City and others. Such insurance shall include the City as additional insured and shall not be reduced or canceled without 30 days written prior notice to the City. The Agency shall provide and maintain a current Certificate of Insurance as evidence of the insurance required in this section. 4. INDEMNITY The Agency agrees to defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its appointed and elected officers and employees, from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damage and expense, including costs and attorney fees in defense thereof because of actions, claims or lawsuits for damages resulting from personal or bodily injury, including death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained or alleged to have been sustained by any person or persons and on account of damage to property, arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out of or in consequence of or the performance of this Agreement, whether such injuries to persons or damage to property is due to the negligence of Agency, its subcontractors, agents, successor, or assigns. This provision shall be inapplicable to the extent the City are judicially found solely negligent for such damage or injury. 5. NOTICES Any notices required to be given by the City to the Agency or by the Agency to the City shall be in writing and delivered to the following parties at the following addresses: City: CDBG Program Administrator City of Bremerton 345 6th Street Suite 600 Bremerton, W A 98337 Agency: Barbara Day Miller AGAPE 5464 Kitsap Way Bremerton, W A 98312 6. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING The Agency shall not assign or subcontract any portion of the services provided within the terms of this contract without obtaining prior written approval from the City. All terms and conditions of this Contract shall apply to any approved subcontract or assignment related to the Contract. 7. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such, nor _ sQaLI any waiver or relinquishment of such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any other breach. 8. AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT The parties hereby further agree that this Agreement cannot be amended or modified without the written concurrence of both parties. 9. FAILURE TO PERFORM In the event of a failure by the Agency to comply, with any terms or conditions of this Contract or to provide in any manner the activities or other performance as agreed to herein, the City reserves the right to temporarily withhold all or any part of payment pending correction of the deficiency, suspend all or part of the contract, or prohibit the Agency from incurring additional obligations of funds until the City is satisfied that corrective action has been taken or completed. The option to withhold funds is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the City's right to terminate as provided in Article IV. 10 of the General Conditions of this Agreement. The City may consider performance under this Agreement when considering future awards. 10. TERMINATION If the Agency fails to comply with the tenns and conditions of this Agreement, the City may pursue such remedies as are available in accordance with 24 CFR 85.43 including but not limited to, the termination of this Agreement in the manner specified herein. (A) Termination for Cause - If the Agency fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any of the following conditions exist: (1) The lack of compliance with the provisions of this Agreement are of such scope and nature that the City deems continuation of this Agreement to be substantially non-beneficial to the public interest; (2) The Agency has failed to take satisfactory corrective action as directed by the City or its authorized representative within the time specified by same; (3) The Agency has failed within the time specified by the City or its authorized representative to satisfactorily substantiate its compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, The City may terminate this Agreement in whole or in part, and thereupon shall notify in writing the Agency of the termination, the reasons therefore, and the effective date. The effective date shall not be prior to notification of the termination by the City to the Agency. Costs resulting from obligations incurred by the Agency after termination of the Agreement are not allowable unless specifically authorized in writing by the City. (B) Termination for Convenience The award may be terminated for convenience, in whole or in part, as follows: (1) By the City with the consent of the Agency. The two parties shall agree upon the termination conditions, including the effective date and in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated, or (2) By the Agency upon submitting written notification to the City. The written notification must set forth the reasons for the termination, the effective date, and in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated, However, in the case of a proposed partial termination, the City may terminate the award in its entirety if the City determines that the remaining portion will not accomplish the purpose for which the award was made. (C) Termination for Withdrawal, Reduction or Limitation of Funding In the event that funding from the Federal government is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way after the effective date of this contract, and prior to its normal completion, the City may summarily terminate this Contract as to the funds reduced or limited, notwithstanding any other termination provision of this contract. Termination under this Section shall be effective upon receipt of written notice by the Agency or its representative. 11. CLOSE-OUT Upon termination of this Contract, in whole or in part for any reason including completion of the project, the following provisions shall apply: (A) Upon written request by the Agency, the City shall make or arrange for payment to the Agency of allowable reimbursable costs not covered by previous payments; (B) The Agency shall submit within thirty (30) days after the date of expiration of this Agreement, all financial, performance and other reports required by this Agreement, and in addition, will cooperate in a program audit by the City; (C) In the event a financial audit has not been performed prior to close-out of this Agreement, the City retains the right to withhold a just ang r:~a~onable sum from the final payment to the Agency after fully considering the recommendation on disallowed costs resulting from the final audit. 12. VENUE AND CHOICE OF LAW Any action at law, suit in equity, or other judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement or any provisions thereof shall be instituted only in the Court of the State of Washington, County of Kitsap. It is mutually understood and agreed that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington, both as to interpretation and performance. 13. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE It is understood and agreed by the parties that if any part, term, or provision of this contract is held by the courts to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the state where made, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the parties shall be construed and enforced as if the Agreement did not contain the particular part, term, or provision held to be invalid. 14. INTEGRATED DOCUMENT This Agreement with any attachments constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and both parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been fully set forth in the text of this Agreement. EXECUTED this day of 200 AGENCY: AGAPE Unlimited (Agency) BY: (Signature) (Please Print Name and Title) (Date) ADMINISTRATOR SHELTER PLUS CARE PROGRAM Administrator Date MAYOR, CITY OF BREMERTON Cary Bozeman Date Approved as to form: Bremerton City Attorney INDEX TO SHELTER PLUS CARE AGREEMENT Article I. Project 1. Scope of Services 2. Term of Agreement 3. Program Reporting Article II Financial Conditions 1. Budget and Compensation 2. Documentation of Costs and Other Financial Reporting 3. Reimbursement Article III. Federal Conditions 1. Uniform Administrative Requirements 2. Conflict of Interest 3. Displacement, Relocation, Acquisition and Replacement of Housing 4. Lead Based Paint 5. Discrimination Prohibited Article IV General Conditions 1. Compliance with Laws 2. Licensing and Program Standards 3. Insurance 4. Indemnity 5. Notices 6. Assignment and Subcontracting 7. Reservation of Rights 8. Amendments to Agreement 9. Failure to Perform 10. Termination 11. Close-Out 12. Venue and Choice of Law 13. Severability Clause 14. Integrated Document A TT ACHMENT #1 SHEL TER PLUS CARE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES/PLAN Shelter Plus Care (SPC) is a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) housing grant specifically aimed at housing the disabled homeless population while ensuring that their on-going needs are met through active case management. SPC provides housing assistance funds and requires the agency involved to provide an equal amount of services to the client. The client must be disabled with either, or a combination ofthe following disabilities: severe mental illness, chemical dependency, or AIDS or AIDS related illness. AGAPE, as sponsor ofthe SPC Program will manage the program in accordance with the plan as described in the application and described below. Scope of Services/History The City of Bremerton initially submitted an application to HUD on July 6, 1993 under the McKinney Shelter Plus Care Program for rent assistance to provide alcohol/drug free permanent housing for 8 homeless women with children and 16 homeless men disabled by chronic alcoholism and substance abuse. A grant in the amount of $596,400.00 was awarded on January 5, 1995. Agape Unlimited, a state licensed non-profit alcohol and drug treatment provider, serves as the sponsor and primary social service provider for the project. Agape Unlimited and the City have successfully applied for renewal funds every year since the initial award; see below for current funding levels. Funds were awarded under three components of the Shelter Plus Care Program. Project Based Rental Assistance (PBRA): Assistance is provided to AGAPE for units located at 1323 and 1329 Crawford St. Participants do not retain assistance ifthey move. Sponsor based Rental Assistance (SBRA): Participants reside in housing owned or leased by Agape. Participants do not retain assistance if they move. Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA): Provides grants for rental assistance which allows participants to choose housing of appropriate size (goes with tenant) Agape may require participant to live in a specific structure the first year and in a specific area for the remainder of the participation. Units are located throughout Bremerton city limits. All three components, Project Based Rental Assistance (PBRA), Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) and Sponsor Based Rental Assistance (SBRA) of the original grant have been completed and must be renewed annually. The City submitted and received funding for 2007 as follows: Pro2ram Amount OBR I-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR 5-BR TBRA $33,748.00 1 1 3 SBRA $78,208.00 1 5 3 PBRA $30,720.00 2 Agape's program is composed of three stages: o initial outreach and residential chemical dependency treatment (funded by non Shelter Plus Care sources); .., 3-6 months of drug/alcohol free group living with intensive treatment and job training services; (Project Assistance) o permanent supported housing in the community.(TBRA and SBRA) The continuum of housing linked to appropriate social services is designed to promote self-sufficiency and clean and sober living by providing gradually increasing levels of responsibility and independence based on personal progress in meeting recovery goals. The group houses, located at 1323 and 1329 Crawford St. in Bremerton, provide 18 beds of permanent housing with cooking, cleaning, laundry and recreational facilities including a common room and garden. The program provides a home-like, not an institutional environment for residents. Moreover, the houses are only two blocks from the Agape outpatient treatment facility. The Sponsor based component is typically used both as an intermediary phase and an alternative to group living for families. Agape has identified apartment units throughout the community to utilize in the program. For the Tenant based component, participants must have obtained the self-sufficiency to maintain a unit with little assistance. Participant Selection Participants must be: o Chemically dependent, participating in an outpatient treatment program · 18 years of age or older · hom~less · living on the street or in a homeless shelter, released (with no housing options) to the streets from jail, in-treatment programs, and hospitals. Priority for housing assistance will be as follows: First Priority: Second Priority: Third Priority: Ir~dividuals living on the street; Release from the jail to the street; Release from treatment to the street Screening and selection process will be coordinated by AGAPE who will interview each potential participant to determine eligibility. Persons eligible for the project will be 2 placed on a waiting list and are responsible to contact AGAPE, by telephone, at least once every three days to indicate they are still interested in the program. Tenants are selected from those eligible based upon their position on the waiting list (unless there are documented extenuating circumstances) Method for Asshwine Units Assignment of units is determined according to the clients' needs, including stability in treatment, family size, level of self-sufficiency and need for on-going peer support. Generally, all entering program participants will be required to live in the project based houses. When residents move out, Agape will move new residents into the bedroom that was vacated. Participants that can be accommodated by the Project Based Houses will not be moved around the house unless a woman or man with several children requires the larger spaces located in the lower level of the buildings. Men, including men with children reside in one house and women, including women with children reside in the other house. Those moving out of the Project Based Houses (and having successfully completed stage one of their recovery program) will be placed in either a Sponsor Based house or apartment or in a Tenant Based unit as appropriate. Smaller sponsor based units are utilized by single individuals high in self-sufficiency. Large units are utilized as multiple adult dwellings or as housing for parents with dependent children. The appropriate housing unit will be determined_taking into consideration the quality, access to services, and appropriateness of the unit type. Those moving into Tenant based assistance will locate their own housing within the City of Bremerton. AGAPE will assure the unit meets HQS. The size and type of housing weill be determined according to family size and need. Participant Role in Operations/Manaeement Residents at the group houses will be responsible for regular house maintenance, including cleaning and yard work. Group home residents will have weekly house meetings to address both community and operations issues, and will provide input on program evaluation. These meetings will address mutual responsibility for house chores. All program participants will be involved in decision making and problem solving for the program through on-going program evaluations. Applicant Role in Operations/Maintenance Agape is responsible to ensure that the houses are properly maintained contract for necessary repairs, collect rent, provide cleaning supplies and provide yard tools. Agape counselors assist residents to develop skills for house maintenance, implement the chore list, and facilitate resident meetings. Agape is responsible to ensure that sufficient funding is available to operate and maintain the buildings properly. Agape pays all utility 3 bills, but not long distance phone costs. Agape is available in the evenings and weekends to provide help and supervision for participants. Participant Eligibility Verification Agape will verify eligibility and determine Total Tenant Payment (TTP) for all participants. The following documentation will be required to determine eligibility for each participant: 1. Intake application 2. Certification ofhomelessness 3. Certification of disability 4. Income verification Payment The rent to be paid by each tenant will be calculated based on the highest of: · 30 percent of the family's monthly adjusted income (adjustment factors include the number of people in the family, age of family members, medical expenses, and child care expenses); or, · 10 percent of the family's monthly income. Housing Quality Standards and Rent Reasonableness Cer.tHication All necessary Housing Quality Standards (HQS) Inspections and Rent reasonableness studies will be performed by Agape who will also maintain the required documentation. Agape may enter into a contractual agreement relative to the Shelter Plus Care Program with a landlord only after it has certified that the housing unit meets HQS and rent reasonableness criteria. Lead Based Paint Requirements AGAPE will assure all units meet HUD's Lead Based Paint Requirements. Assessment Methods The Continuum of Care Coalition consists of local participating agencies providing services, and Agape. The committee will meet at least monthly to share program information on housing units, client services and record keeping requirements. The City of Bremerton will participate in the meetings once a year. Additionally, the Coalition will assess and make recommendations regarding: · how effective outreach efforts were to identify initial program participants and additional participants as space became available; · how well coordinated the system of services is to meet the changing needs of clients; · how efficient is the mechanism for administering rental assistance. 4 The Coalition will discuss specific case studies to measure the clients' stability in housing, improved functioning, the use of treatment and community services, the degree of independence achieved, and the degree of client satisfaction with the services provided. AGAPE will submit semi-annual reports to the City of Bremerton. Request for Payment No less than two weeks prior to the last day of each month Agape must provide verification of rent subsidy payments required for the upcoming month. NO PAYMENT WILL BE MADE UNLESS THIS VERIFICATION IS RECEIVED. Such verification includes the following: 1. Documentation regarding participant eligibility as previously described; 2. HQS inspections and rent reasonableness studies as described above; 3. A signed contract between Agape and the Landlord for payment of housing assistance; 4. A signed lease agreement for a period of no less than thirty (30) days between the Landlord and Agape; 5. An agreement between the Landlord and the service agency regarding support serVIces. The City of Bremerton will promptly process the payment. Administrative Fee The HUD Shelter Plus Care program authorizes an eight percent (8%) administrative fee for the following activities: providing rental payments to landlords; examining family income; providing housing information and assistance; inspecting units for HQS; and receiving new participants into the program. An analysis indicates the City of Bremerton provides approximately 25% of these services and AGAPE provides 75%. Therefore, 6% of the administrative fee will be available to AGAPE and 2% to the City ofBremerton. To assure that administrative funds are available through the life of the Shelter Plus Care Program, the funds will be disbursed based on the amount of the monthly draw (for example, if the monthly draw is $2,500 AGAPE will receive $150.00 and the City of Bremerton will receive $50.00 in administrative fees). Documentation of the time spent on the activities must be maintained by the City of Bremerton and AGAPE. . 5 Housin2 Assistance Payments Rent subsidy payments will be made by Agape to the landlord(s) as appropriate Agape will maintain a special bank account dedicated solely to Shelter Plus Care activities. All funds received from the City of Bremerton will be placed in and disbursed from this account. Agape will maintain records of rent subsidy payments to landlords. Vacancy Payments Agape must immediately notify the City of Bremerton upon termination of tenancy so that the City may determine allowable vacancy payments to landlord(s). 'Hun Required Reportin2 AGAPE will provide the data to the City of Bremerton for the HUD annual report. 6 DATE SUBMITTED: April 3, 2007 BILL# 07- 099_ AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 56- ........................................................................................ ; I SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 5007 amending BMC Section 2.92.040 relating to insurance, self-insurance and pooled coverage programs qommittee Meeting Date: COUNCIL MEETING Date: I ! Department: Presenter: Phone: April 25, 2007 May 2, 2007 Financial Services Peggy Lesser ~ 473-5302 i SUMMARY: The current provisions ofBMC Seciion 2.92.040 restrict the City's ability to bind insurance coverage in a timely manner. The propo~ed ordinance amends BMC Section 2.92.040 in order to authorize the Risk Manager to bind insuratice coverage to protect the City of Bremerton. ! ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance : FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): iNone APPROV ALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR' CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MA YOR: I _f~~; . I I RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Ordinance No. 50D7 2.92.040 to authorize the Risk Manager to bind insJrance coverage. COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: CONSENT AGENDA ~. GENERAL BUSINESS D PUBLIC HEARING D amending BMC Section COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table D Continue D No Action ORDINANCE NO. 5007 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, amending Section 2.92.040 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the purchase of insurance policies, funded self-insurance programs, pooled coverage and related services. WHEREAS, the current provisions of Section 2.92.040 of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to the purchase of insurance policies, funded self-insurance programs, pooled coverage and related services restrict the City's ability to bind insurance coverage in a timely manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the provisions relating to the purchase of insurance policies, funded self-insurance programs, pooled coverage and related services in order to authorize the Risk Manager to bind insurance coverage to protect the City of Bremerton; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 2.92.040 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Insurance/Self-Insurance/Pooled Coverage Programs" is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.92.040 INSURANCE/SELF-INSURANCE/POOLED COVERAGE PROGRAMS. The Risk Manager is responsible for the design, negotiation, procurement and administration of all insured, self-insured and/or pooled coverage programs: (a) The Risk Manager shall determine and recommend the appropriate retention levels and amount of reserves to be established; (b) The Risk Manager shall negotiate with insurance brokers for any type of insurance and may recommend that the City engage the services of such brokers; (c) The Risk Manager shall purchase, with the approval of the Director of Financial Services and City Council, all insurance policies, funded self-insurance programs, pooled coverage and related services, and shall administer the samet. The Risk Manager is authorized to bind propertv. casualty. and surety insurance coverage without prior approval by City Council subiect to budget authority. Within 60 days of binding coverage. the Risk Manager shall advise City Council that coverage was bound and seek City Council approval for continuation of the bound coverage; (d) The Risk Manager shall make an annual report to the City Council regarding insurance coverage and the level of retained risk, and such other reports as may be required by the Council. SECTION 2. Severability. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not 1 BMC 2.92.040 affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2007 WILL MAUPIN, Council President Approved this day of ,2007 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney day of day of ,2007 ,2007 PUBLISHED the EFFECTIVE the ORDINANCE NO. R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Risk\Section 2.92 insurance purchase.doc 2 BMC 2.92.040 DATE SUBMITTED: March 28, 2007 BILL # 07'--/00 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 5H ........................................................................................ SUBJECT: Risk Management Fund Budget Adjustment Committee Meeting Date: April 25, 2007 COUNCIL MEETING Date: May 2, 2007 Department: Financial Services"? Presenter: Peggy Lesse~/5K Phone: 473-5302 SUMMARY: Risk Management has successfully settled two workers' compensation claims filed by former employees in the Public Works and Parks departments. In each instance, efforts to return the employees to work have proved futile, and each has taken legal action in pursuit of benefits. With the Mayor's and Mayor Pro Tempore's approval, negotiated settlements have been reached. Risk Management requests a budget adjustment of$81,626 to the Workers' Compensation Disability Pay line item and a reduction in the ending fund balance of the Risk Management Fund accordingly. . A TT ACHMENTS: Settlement authorizations signed by the City Attorney, Mayor, and Mayor Pro Tempore FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The ending fund balance will be reduced by $81,626 to pay the amounts due. Adequate reserves have been set aside to make these payments. COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: '"'' .......... APPROV ALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MA YOR: ~ ;J CONSENT AGENDA ~. GENERAL BUSINESS 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve an adjustment to the 2007 Risk Management Fund budget by $81,626 for payment in settlement of two workers' compensation claims. COUNCIL ACTION: n Approve n Denv n Table n Continue n No Action " " B"" ,: ,'.'" , . '. ~ ~" " " 'M.~ Office of Risk Management and Safety Margaret Lesser, Risk Manager Memorandum [<7~ 1':''( If, it: 3 .f~"l:~... ~ ~; t,; ", >i \ ' Da18: November 8. 20006 City of C'~ A" 'JIiV .".HoYnp1ii~. r)Hi~"i' '- '., ""f '.: \'.,. \i;;>..,.e TI: Roger Lubovich, City Attorney Fr.m: Peggy Lesser, Risk rVlanageri-<~;'" .1: Ron~orkers' Compensation Appeal As you may recall, former PW employee Ron_lipped and fell in a City parking lot on November II, 1996. He filed a workers' compensation claim, and medical and time loss benefits were provided until the claim was closed in October, 1998. His employment with Bremerton was terminated in September, 2002, after he basically stopped coming to work. Mr. .Js application to reopen his claim was denied by the Department of Labor and Industries on May 14,2004, and he has appealed that decision to Kitsap County's Superior Court. Jury trial is set to begin on December 4, 2006, with the sole issue being whether Mr. "'S industrial injury objectively worsened between October, 1998 and May, 2004. Carol Casey, M~'s attorney; has expressed an interest in reaching a settlement prior to trial. Her opening demand is for $103,000 based on her expressed belief that Mr.--' could be entitled to 4 years of back time loss benefits. Although it is unlikely that Mr. would prevail in securing that level of time loss benefits, Bremerton will spend $15,000 to defend the appeal at trial. Should the jury decide that Mr. _s claim should be reopened, Bremerton would be required to pay his attorney fees - approximately $30,000. Thus, the immediate costs of a superior court loss would be roughly $45,000. Treatment costs would begin again, with the very real possibility of time loss benefits, retraining costs, and a pension becoming a reality as well. I have authorized Bremerton's attorney, Andrew Myers, to counter Ms. Casey's opening demand with an offer of $12,500. Since further negotiations will exceed my settlement authority, I am seeking your support in requesting that the Mayor provide you and me with $45,000 in settlement authority to resolve this matter prior to trial. If you concur, please sign below and I will secure settlement authority from the Mayor. I approve of and authorize settlement of Ron_workers' compensation claim, with a (..~a,,~I~~~Cltlcment paYmentor~.4S'OOO to b2~;g~::ent~:nd.. Rhger Luhovich. City Attorney' Cary Bozcman, J'vlaYllr B. DIll: TI: Fram: BI: Office of Risk Management and Safety Margaret Lesser, Risk Manager Memorandum December 15, 2006 Roger Lubovich, City Attorney Cary Bozeman, Mayor P L R. k 1\1 /'/O~ eggy esser, IS lV anager V ^-- Willian__ - Wi11iam~ a 61-year-old former part-time laborer inothe Parks Department, who leased a park house from Bremerton on a month-to-month basis with rent waived in return for services provided. On May 26, 2003, Mr. ~slipped and then regained his balance while standing in a wet truck bed throwing a bag of garbage into a dumpster. He alleged that he sustained a right shoulder injury as a result of this im.:ident. Mr. .d.. !iled a workers'. compensation claim and began. treatment for his injured shoulder~ Modified duty assignments were offered to and accepted by Mr. _ , however, he repeatedly failed to report to work. His employment was terminated on November 3,2003 for failure to regularly report for work and his month-to-month lease was terminated. Mr. - _ --Ijled a discrimination complaint against Bremerton and also asked the Department of Labor and Industries to re-compute his time loss benefit to include the value of the housing that had been provided by Bremerton. The Department of Labor and Industries ultimately issued an order awarding time loss benefits that included $450 per month in housing benefits. The City of Bremerton appealed that order. Mr.. ~continued to receive intermittent treatment for his shoulder, but his pain complaints did not diminish. He underwent shoulder surgery on July 15,2004. Physical therapy followed, a vocational rehabilitation plan was developed, and pain complaints continued. The surgeon recommended retraining and an occupational goal of veterinary technician was adopted. The Kitsap Humane Society was amenable to having Mr. .perform on-the-job training at its location until Mr. presented himself unfavorably during an interview there. A new vocational plan will need to be developed and implemented before this claim can be closed with a finding that i\lr. ____is employable. He will also be entitled to a residual disability rating based on the less than completely successful surgery. The City's appeal dealing with time loss benefits for deferred rent is now pending. It would appear wise to settle all of the disputes related to this claim at one time. Mr. ~ "II appears to be \villing to concede, tor a price, that he is currently able to work and has been able to work for an extended period of time. This would tenninate his entitlement to the ongoing time loss MH\'10RANDUM: Wi/liol/1 U"'lhun/r De('l'lllber 1.'\. 200h Page: 2 benetits he is receiving, end the disagreement over deterred rent, eliminate the need to develop and implcment a new vocational rehabilitation plan, and end the use of outside counsel. I believe settlement is likely to be less costly than trying to rehabilitate an individual who has repeatedly demonstrated resistance to becoming employable. Therefore, settlement authority, not to exceed $45,000 is requested. This should cover all employability issues, all back time loss issues, and an agreement to not dispute a partial disability award made by an agreed-upon physician. It should be noted that the $45,000 amount is expected to cover the entire disability award, but it is possible (but not probable) the disability award would be larger than anticipated. Your concun"ence is required. I hereby concur and authorize settlement of the _ claim as described above: )' ..... ,/ \ /,...,.iiI' ".."'") ,-;7"''''' L_ ( ~ :/~.,/ /"? ('~ II ",'./ 'Jz.. .# ~. /~-rvt/(>'c ",,/ (....~ -.... ,.- "- .'l-/ V ~ ,'-"-! ,-'" # c' Cat:y-BozerrWn, M~yor Vr! i'7Jc/\ .~...-t,-~.;;...,.~ ~/...... DATE SUBMITTED: April 10, 2007 BILL # () 7 - I 0 I AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON 5 -,- CITY COUNCIL .... ....................................'.................................................... SUBJECT: 2007 Budget Amendment for 2006 Project Carry Forward Items Committee Meeting Date: 4/25/2007 COUNCIL MEETING Date: 51212007 Department: Financial Services Presenter: Laura Lyon Phone: 473-5722 SUMMARY: Several projects that were underway at the end of 2006 and/or expected to be completed prior to the end of 2006 - were not completed by year end as anticipated. The attached schedule to this agenda bill includes a listing (by fund) of the previously approved expenditures and related revenue items that were not concluded. These expenditures now require a budget adjustment to authorize these expenditures to occur in 2007. Funds for these expenditures are provided by the carry forward of greater fund balances from 2006 (resulting from these expenditures not occurring as \ originally planned) and/or from delayed receipt of identified revenue sources that also carry forward into 2007. ATTACHMENTS: Discussion memorandum and schedule of expenditures & related revenue items to be carried forward to 2007 . COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: Lf~~-:; CONSENT AGENDA GENERAL BUSINESS 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to amend the 2007 budget to include expenditures, and any related transfers of funds and revenue sources, as identified, for previously approved projects that were not completed by the end of 2006. COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny D Table D Continue D No Action ;..;.j.m.'''''~.'..#li.. ' ~" I:;m l\ :{~ "",--,-,"-.,.~-..,..~~. ,0, "':__. "'-<"'-"~~ ":L;;l;i ::";>;: n ......~~~'l Memorandum To: Re: City Council Mayor Cary Bozeman Laura Lyon, Director of Financial servic~ 2007 Budget Amendment for 2006 Carry Forward Projects From: Date: March 28, 2007 Each year there are projects underway and/or expected to be completed by the end of the year that for a variety of reasons end up not concluded in the timelines expected. Because the projects were expected to conclude by year end (2006) - no provisions are. made in the following budget year (2007) for these expenditures; These expenditures were previously budgeted for, so the effect of the work not being completed is that the ending fund balances of the affected funds are greater than. the following'year budget anticipated and/or there is a delay into the subsequent year of receipts from identified revenue sources. The funds are available from the carry forward of greater fund balance and delayed revenue sources receipts, but a subsequent year budget adjustment is necessary to provide expenditure authority for the project managers. In previous years, these budget amendments to carry forward uncompleted projects came to council for approval in a series of individual agenda bills. Last year we instituted a change to this practice by collecting the information and doing one agenda bill for action on all the known items that require a carry forward budget approval. This seemed to work well and we are managing this process in the same way for 2007. The attached list of budget adjustments are the items that staff is asking council to approve for expenditure in 2007. The funding for the additional 2007 budget approval is from the carry forward of fund balance from the prior year and/or from the carry forward of delayed receipts of identified funding sources. With council's approval of this agenda bill the work may be completed on the projects. When the mid year budget amendment ordinance is prepared - these and other budget amendments acted upon by council by previous motions or resolutions will be formally incorporated into an amended 2007 budget. Staff is asking for your approval of these 2007 budget amendments at the Council's May 2, 2007 business meeting. 2006 Carryover Projects - Expenditure Fund Department Project Amount Coding Comments 001 General Police Capital Improvement - New Facility 10,000 594.2120 54110 Remaining capital expenditures 50,600 594.2120 56210 associated with new facility and 3,200 594.2120 56310 equipment. 50,000 594.2120 56430 11,200 594.2120 56440 001 General General Facilities PW&U Oyster Bay Electrical Improvements 17,200 594.1849 56210 Project Date - June thru August PW&U Oyster Bay Interior Remodel 8,800 Project Date - June thru August Equip. Srvs Oyster Bay Electrical Lighting 8,800 Project Date - June thru August Fire Station Warehouse Mezzanine 11,900 Construction with Restroom Project Fire Station Warehouse Restroom 5,000 Construciton with Mezzanine Project Fire Station 2 Misc. Improvements - Cabinets 4,900 Remaining Cabinets on Order Fire Station 2 Noise Barrier 1,200 To be completed in April 001 General Parks Greenhouse 25,945 594.7651 56510 Delayed due to weather & permitting Total General Fund 208,745 102 Street Street Electrical Cabinets 47,000 595.6442 56430 On Order Street Capital Hill Fire Station Improvements 42,587 542.8042 53110 AB 06-178 103 Contingency Reserve Contingency Reserve Transfer to Parks Capital 199,650 597.0081 50310 Parks Restricted Funds Transfer to Public Safety Bond Fund 350,000 597.0081 50302 Cencom Proceeds for Court Facility 113 BKAT BKAT Camera Equipment 8,352 594.7184 56430 Lenses for cameras 302 Public Safety Public Safety Law Enforcement Facility 420,850 594.2127 56210 Fire Control Capital 93,339 594.2227 56310 Per AB 06-279 303 Harborside Park Harborside Park Park Construction 2,496,188 594.7657 56510 308 Gen Gov't Cap Imp Gen Gov't Cap .Imp Transfer to General Fund 57,800 597.0083 50001 Transfer for Gen Facility Improvements Pollution Control 187,450 531.7083 54110 Brownsfield Grant Kiss 'n Ride 135,000 559.9083 54510 Budgeted in 2005 401 Water Water Capital AC PS #2 Upgrades 125,553 594.3434 56310 Anderson Creek Chlorine Generators 181,151 594.3434 56430 451 Wastewater Wastewater Capital Pacific Ave Point Repairs 19,840 594.3535 56310 481 Stormwater Engineering NPDES Permit 100,000 538.8037 54110 Total Other Funds 4,464,760 Grand Total 4,673,505 2006 Carryover Projects - Revenue Fund Department Project Amount Coding Comments 001 General Fund Police Capital Improvements - New Facility 92,850 20 331.1673 Dept. of Justice Equipment Grant Funding Capital Improvements - New Facility 32,150 20 331.1671 Dept. of Justice Technology Grant 001 General Fund General Facilties Transfer 57,800 49 397.0308 Transfer for General Faciltiy Improvements Total General Fund 182,800 117 One Percent For Art One Percent For Art Interfund Trust Contributions 81,918 75 366.5000 302 Public Safety Bond Public Safety Bond Transfer 350,000 27 397.0103 Sale of Cencom Building 303 Haborside Park Harborside Park EDI HUD Grant 60,688 57 331.1424 WA Dept. of Com, Trade & Econ Dev 1,124,482 57 334.0420 Non-Taxable Sale of Asset 120,000 57 395.1002 308 Gen Gov't Cap Imp Gen Gov't Cap Imp Brownsfield Assessment 187,450 83 331.6681 310 Parks Capital Imp Parks Capital Imp Transfer 199,650 59 397.0001 Transfer for Sale of Tennis Court Property Total Other Funds 2,124,188 Grand Total 2,306,988 DATE SUBMITTED: March 2], 2007 BILL # 07--!O~ 5~ AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ..........................~.............................m............................... SUBJECT: Amend the 2007 budget for additional principal payments on the Conference Center variable rate debt obligation Committee Meeting Date: COUNCIL MEETING Date: Department: Presenter: Phone: 4/25/2007 5/2/2007 Financial Services . Laura Lyon 473-5722 SUMMARY: In 2006, the City experienced strong financial performance in the General Fund. As a result of increased revenues and reduced expenditures, the General Fund had a higher ending fund balance than was anticipated to carry forward as the beginning fund balance for 2007. After making consideration for; 1) cap,ital work that was not completed in 2006 that should be carried forward into 2007, 2) provision of adequate I reserves and contingency planning, and 3) other budget amendments previously approved by the City Council or anticipated to be approved in the future - there is a net available positive fund balance remaining that is recommended to be used for additional street maintenance supplies and additional reduction of outstanding debt obligations in 2007. An expenditure of $125,000 for additional principal retirement of the City's outstanding 2003 Conference Center variable rate debt obligation not only reduces the City's final obligation for repayment of the debt - but it also results in an estimated interest expense savings of $96,862 over the remaining term of the loan agreement (using today' s variable rate percentage to estimate future period rates). It is the recommendation of the Director of Financial Services that the City Council approve a budget amendment authorizing the transfer of $125,000 from the General Fund to the Bond Fund and authorize the expenditure in the Bond Fund of $125,000 for additional principal repayment on outstanding Conference Center debt. ATTACHMENTS: Explanatory Memo FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The requested budget amendment will transfer an additional $125,000 from the General Fund (Fund 001) to the Bond Fund (Fund 201) and authorize additional debt principal payments in the Bond Fund of $125,000. The Financial results for 2006 provided a positive General Fund ending fund balance variance carrying forward into 2007 - which is more than sufficient to cover this additional expenditure in 2007. :;". .--- ~ .~------ APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MA YOR: COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ~~;;. CONSENT AGENDA GENERAL BUSINESS 0 PUBLIC HEARING 0 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve a budget adjustment authorizing the transfer of $125,000 from the General Fund to the Bond Fund and authorizing additional debt principal payments in the same amount. COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table D Continue D No Action ,,-- ," ,-- -." ,-'- ". ,~". l}m'.....'''...~,.....}; ;,~ ; ^ ii., .~. ..:'..1 ~j{ ~.. n ".' '., ~; >,~~,_, .<~" C..., _ ," ,." ,-.>,",,, ,"" ,. ;',__>,"J' -,~~! ( ?~i~~{;t~,...~.~! Memorandum To: City Council Members Mayor Cary Bozeman From: Laura Lyon, Director of Financial Services Re: Amendment of the 2007 Budget for Additional Principal Payments on Conference Center Debt Obligation Date: March 21 , 2007 In 2006, the City experienced strong financial performance in the General Fund. As a result of increased revenues and reduced expenditures, the General Fund had a higher ending fund balance than was anticipated to carry forward as the beginning fund balance for 2007. After making consideration for 1) capital work that was not"completed in 2006 that should be carried forward into 2007; 2) provision of adequate reserves and contingency planning; and 3) other budget amendments previously approved by the City Councilor anticipated to be approved in the future - there is a het available positive fund balance remaining" that is recommended to be used for additional street maintenance supplies and additional reduction of outstanding debt obligations in 2007. The City Financial Goals & Policies provide that "Cash balances in excess of the amount required to maintain strategic reserves may be used to fund one-time or non-recurring costs. Preference should be given to uses that reduce ongoing expenses (for example - early retirement of debt)." Early retirement of debt is clearly an appropriate and desirable use of available surpluses as articulated in the Financial Goals & Policies. An expenditure of $125,000 for additional principal retirement of the City's outstanding 2003 Conference Center variable rate debt obligation not only reduces the City's final obligation for repayment of the debt - but it also results in an estimated interest expense savings of $96,862 over the remaining term of the loan agreement (using today's variable rate percentage to estimate future period rates). It is the recommendation of the Director of Financial Services that the City Council approve a budget amendment authorizing the transfer of $125,000 from the General Fund to the Bond Fund and authorize an expenditure in the Bond Fund of $125,000 for additional principal payments on the 2003 Conference Center variable rate debt. I am asking for the City Council to approve this budget amendment at it's May 2nd business meeting. DATE SUBMITTED: March 21, 2007 BILL # 07- 703 5K AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ........................................................................................ SUBJECT: Amend the 2007 budget for additional street maintenance supplies Committee Meeting Date: COUNCIL MEETING Date: Department: Presenter: Phone: 4/25/2007 5/2/2007 Financial Services Laura Lyon 473-5722 SUMMARY: In 2006, the City experienced strong financial performance in the General Fund. As a result of increased revenues and reduced expenditures, the General Fund had a higher ending fund balance than was anticipated to carry forward as the beginning fund balance for 2007. After making consideration for; 1) capital work that was not completed in 2006 that should be carried forward into 2007, 2) provision of adequate reserves and contingency planning, and 3) other budget amendments previously approved by the City Council or anticipated to be approved in the future - there is a net available positive fund balance remaining that is recommended to be used for additional street maintenance supplies and additional reduction of outstanding debt obligations in 2007. An additional expenditure of $125,000 for street maintenance combined with existing budgeted labor resources, will allow the Street Department to significantly increase the scope of the 2007 paving list of work to be completed It is the recommendation of the Director of Financial Services that the City Council approve a budget amendment authorizing the transfer of $125,000 from the General Fund to the Street Fund and authorize the additional expenditure in the Street Fund of $ I 25,000 for street maintenance supplies. ATTACHMENTS: Explanatory Memo, original Street Fund paving list for 2007, and revised Street Fund paving list if additional supply expenditures of $125,000 is approved. FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The requested budget amendment will transfer an additional $125,000 from the General Fund (Fund 001) to the Street Fund (Fund 102) and authorize additional supplies expenditures in the Street Fund of $125,000. The Financial results for 2006 provided a positive General Fund ending fund balance variance carrying forward into 2007 - which is more than sufficient to cover this additional expenditure in 2007. COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: :::::::::::; APPROVALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MAYOR: CONSENT AGENDA %. GENERAL BUSINESS D PUBLIC HEARING D RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve a budget adjustment authorizing the transfer of $125,000 from the General Fund to the Street Fund and authorizing additional supplies expenditures in the Street Fund in the same amount. COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table D Continue D No Action Memorandum To: City Council Members Mayor Cary Bozeman From: Laura Lyon, Director of Financial SeNices Re: Amendment of the 2007 Budget for Additional Street Maintenance Supplies Date: March 21,2007 In 2006, the City experienced strong financial performance in the General Fund. As a result of increased revenues and reduced expenditures, the General Fund had a higher ending fund balance than was anticipated to carry forward as the beginning fund balance for 2007. After making consideratioll fgr",1) capital work that was not completed in 2006 that should be carried forward into 2007; 2) provision of adequate reseNes and contingency planning; and 3) other budget amendments previously approved by the City Councilor anticipated to be approved in the future - there is a net available positive fund balance remaining that is recommended to be used for additional street maintenance supplies and additional reduction of outstanding debt obligations in 2007. The City Financial Goals & Policies provide that "Cash balances in excess of the amount required to maintain strategic reserves may be used to fund one-time or non-recurring costs. Preference should be given to uses that reduce ongoing expenses (for example - early retirement of debt)." Paving supplies, while ongoing in nature, are scaleable and are annually increased or decreased in the amount authorized - based on the level of available funding. Overlaying streets sooner also reduces costs since it stops the accelerating deterioration of the pavement before additional sub-grade damage occurs. An additional expenditure of $125,000 for street maintenance (combined with existing budgeted labor resources) will allow the Street Department to significantly increase the scope of the 2007 paving list. It is the recommendation of the Director of Financial SeNices that the City Council approve a budget' amendment authorizing the transfer of $125,000 from the General Fund to the Street Fund and authorize an additional expenditure in the Street Fund of $125,000 for street maintenance supplies. I am asking for the City Council to approve this budget amendment at it's May 2nd business meeting. PAVING LIST 2007 wo# I LOCATION I WIDTH I FOOTAGE I OVERLAY ! REPAIR I TONNAGE I I Lafayette Avenue/13th to 15th I I I I I 1 20 675 I X I 200 I I IJOhn StreeUHemlock to deadend I I I 2 I 15 130 X I 50 3 I LakehursUKitsap Way to 600' east I 22 600 X I I 165 4 10th StreeURainier Avenue to Olym[)ic Avenue I 35 523 X 230 5 12th StreeUlympic Avenue to Naval Avenue 15 662 X I 125 6 13th StreeUCallow to Montgomery I 23 267 X 80 7 13th StreeUPennsylvania to High 29 272 X I 110 8 Brentwood Drive/Brentwood Drive to dead end W 22 202 X 60 9 I Lafayette Avenue/E Phinney Bay Drive to deadend 24 296 X I 90 10 Wilbert Avenue/6th Street to 9th Street 24 I 668 X 200 11 Wilbert Avenue/9th Street to 11 th Street 20 547 X T 140 12 Wilbert Avenue/11th Street to Kitsap Way 25 355 X 115 13 Icedararove StreeUAlnus Wav to Bristlecone Drive 17 263 X 60 14 Cedararove StreeUSylvan Way to Alnus Way 36 532 X I 242 15 Cherry Avenue/Sheridan Road to Linberg Place 24 298 X 92 16 Cherry Avenue/Linberg Place to Sunset Vista 24 420 X 130 u 17 Ni[)sic Avenue/East 22nd Street to East 23rd Street 39 191 X 95 18 Pitt Avenue/E 16th Street to E 17th Street 33 495 X 208 19 Pitt Avenue/17th Street to deadend 33 200 X 85 20 Worrall Drive/Almira Drive to Petersville Road 32 65 X 270 I 7,661 2747 ARTERIAL STREET PROJECTS I Bruenn Avenue/Bruwell to 5th Street 32 385 X 154 Bruenn Avenue/5th Street to Autocenter Way 30 310 X 116 11 th StreeUKitsap Way to Callow Avenue 48 859 X 500 22 23 1,554 I 770 MAJOR REPAIRS I I 11th Street eastbound at Rainier 0 various X 30 Naval Avenue southbound 6th to Burwell 0 various X 30 24 6th StreeUCallow to Montaomerv 0 various X I 20 Union Avenue/Werner Road south to Poindexter 0 various I X 140 25 I I 220 261 I I Asphalt Tons 3737 I Street Costs I Arterial Street C:IUser/JoycelExcellBobTulplPaving List 2007 3/22/2007 PAVING LIST 2007 ADDENDUM wo# ! LOCA TION ! WIDTH I FOOTAGE I OVERLAY I REPAIR I TONNAGE 1 17th Street/Hiqh Avenue to Ohio Avenue I 33 785 X I 325 2 Arsenal Way/Marion Avenue to Constitution 20 109 X 30 I~ IArsenal Way/Constitution Avenue to Yantic Avenue 20 546 X I 140 4 I Beach Drive/deadend to Shorewood Drive 18 867 X I 200 5 I Dora Avenue/Burwell Street to 6th Street 25 I 667 X I :;- 6 IWilmont Street/Harlow to Kitsap Way 19 1,720 X I 408 8 Fv:9ome'" Ave""e/13th Streetto 15th Stceet 29 664 X 245 9 35 I 1,380 X 605 Veldee Avenue/24th Street to 26th Street 13 Wycoff Avenue/13th Street to 15th Street 20 665 X 170 !. I 22 665 X 185 14 I Wycoff Avenue/15th Street to 17th Street 15 Wycoff Avenue/17th Street to 19th Street 20 665 X 170 16 Almira Drive/Hollis Street to Clemens Street 38 648 X 310 17 IAlmira Drive/Clemens Street to Almira Court 38 255 X 125 18 4th Street/Pacific Avenue to Park Avenue 40 820 X 400 19 20 - ..- ~ 21 , I I 10,456 3523 . 22 23 I I I 24 25 26 I I I I I I I I C:IUser/JoycelExcellBobTulplAddedum Pa~ing List 2007 3/22/2007 DATE SUBMITTED: 04/18/07 BTLL#1J7-J 01- AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL ~A ........................................................................................ SUBJECT: General Fund allocation to 2007 recipients of CDBG funding. Committee Meeting Date: 04/25/07 COUNCIL MEETING Date: 05/02/07 Department: DCD - CDBG Presenter: Howe, Vila Phone: 473-5211 SUMMARY: In 2006, the City experienced strong financial performance in the General Fund. As a result of increased revenues and reduced expenditures, the General Fund had a higher ending fund balance than was anticipated to carry forward as the beginning fund balance for 2007. $18,000 of this balance carry forward is requested to provide a $2,000 funding 'boost' to nine public service agencies partially funded with CDBG funds in 2007. A breakdown of these agencies and the services provided is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Staff memo, CDBG funding summary for 2007 FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): $18,000.00, unbudgeted item for 2007. Requesting a budget amendment to provide authority to expend these amounts. Funding to be provided by General Fund ending fund balance. Positive fund balance carried forward from 2006 is sufficient to over this cost. APPROV ALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MA YOR: -- COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: ~ CONSENT AGENDA D GENERAL BUSINESS ~ PUBLIC HEARING D RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve an amendment to the 2007 budget by $18,000.00 using General Fund balance to provide $2,000.00 each to nine partially funded CDBG Public Service Projects for 2007. COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve 0 Deny 0 Table o Continue D No Action DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM To: Council DCD Planning Committee From: Betsy Howe and Marie Vila, CDBG programtr Date: April 6, 2007 Re: Additional funding for 2007 Public Services projects As you are aware, many nonprofit and public agencies serving Bremerton and Kitsap County provide a variety of much needed services to the City's low income and 'working poor' citizens. These services provide a tremendous value to the whole community. Unfortunately, funding for staff and operating costs continues to be the most difficult to obtain for these agencies despite the fact that ongoing staff services, such as counseling, are vital for any client to achieve self sufficiency. .- .. CDBG funds for these services are limited by regulation to 15% of our annual allocation. Over the past 10 years our allocation has decreased and, at best, remained stagnant. Unfortunately, the cost of these services increases and the net result is to serve fewer citizens at a time of increased need. Many other CDBG Entitlement Communities, such as the Cities of Seattle, Longview and Federal Way, contribute to similar services out of their General Funds. The City, in light of a one-time budget surplus, has graciously agreed to consider funding the following projects with General Funds. The Council Finance Committee has approved this request. In 2007, a contribution of $18,000 would boost 9 partially funded Public Service projects at $2,000 each. Such a contribution would greatly help: -Kitsap Sexual Assault Center to continue to fund a counselor for abused children in the City of Bremerton. The Bremerton Police Department regularly refers clients to this service -Kitsap Community Resources to continue to staff a Transitional Housing counseling program to prevent homelessness in Bremerton -RMH Services to continue to staff a program that serves and counsels Bremerton's most challenging mentally ill clients. -YMCA to provide childcare scholarships to more Bremerton children that might otherwise be at home alone after school and over the summer. -City of Bremerton Parks Department to staff a summer lunch program in Matan and Evergreen Parks. -Kitsap Boys and Girls Club to staff a new site at the Naval Avenue school that will provide afterschool activities for children that might otherwise be home alone. -Kitsap Literacy Council to provide services to program participants seeking skills and certifications (such as a GED) to increase self sufficiency. -YWCA to staff a bilingual advocate for women and children in domestic violence situations. -Catholic Community Services to staff Benedict House, a program for homeless men aimed at obtaining self sufficiency. While the Citizens' Advisory Committee recognizes the importance of these agencies and the work that they do, lack of adequate CDBG funding led to partial awards for most ranging from 25% to 65% of their original requests. As part of the application process, CDBG staff reviews the financial statements of each of these agencies and we have found them to be very prudent and efficient in their use of public funds. In short, a little goes a long way to help our citizens most in l1e~d..: Thank you and the Council for considering this funding request, and the Mayor for initiating it. Should anyone desire further information please do not hesitate to contact Betsy at 473-5211 or Marie at 473-5375. . Page 2 2007 CDBG APPLICATION PROCESS I AMOUNT REQUESTED I FUNDING RECOMMENDATION PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION $126,397 A V AILABLE (estimate) CDBG Administration Adm inistration $126,397 $126,397 TOTAL $126,397 $126,397 PUBLIC SERVICE $96,615 A V AILABLE (estimate) Bremerton Services Association Chuckwagon meals for seniors $]8,750 $]8,750 (100%) Kitsap Sexual Assault Center Child Abuse Intervention $16,600 $10,790 (65%) Kitsap Community Resources Transitional Housing $30,000 $19,500 (65%) RMH Services Untreated Mentally III $13,500 $8,775 (65%) YMCA of Kitsap County Childcare Scholarships $12,000 $7,800 (65%) City of Bremerton Parks Department Playgrounds Program $16,000 $8,000 (50%) Kitsap Boys and Girls Club Naval Avenue Center $10,000 $5,000 (50%) Kitsap Literacy Council Computer Lab for Literacy $13,500 $6,750 (50%) YWCA Bilingual Legal Advocate $20,000 $5,000 (25% ) Catholic Community Services Benedict House Operations $25,000 $6,250 (25%) All funding recommendations are based on an estimated allocation from the Department of Housing and Urban Development and contingent upon the receipt of said funds. Projects are listed in order of priority. Should more funding be received, it will be distributed evenly starting with the applicants funded at the 65% level until those projects are funded at 100%, then to those funded at 50%, then those fund~d at 25%. Should less funding be received, funding cuts will begin with those funded at the 25% level, then the 50% level, and so on. I TOTAL Public Services $175,350 $96,615 I .~ , Page 1 of 1 Lori Smith From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 12:29 PM To: 'ywcajackieb@donobi.net' Cc: Betsy Howe; Marie Vila; Adam Brockus; Brad Gehring; Carol Arends; Dianne Robinson; Mike Shepherd; Nick Wofford; Wendy Priest; Will Maupin Subject: RE: Citizen Letter - Surplus Money Attachments: AGENDA - MAY 2 2007.doc Ms. Brown: Thank you for your message, which was provided to the Council Members for their consideration. Lori Smith Legislative Assistant Bremerton City Council (360) 473-5280 -----Original Message----- From: ywcajackieb@donobi.net [mailto:ywcajackieb@donobi.net] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11 :43 AM To: City Council Subject: Surplus Hi, The YWCA ALIVE Shelter hopes that the City Council will vote to share the Surplus monies of $2000.00 per agency with us. The monies will do great things for homeless women and children and families in Bremerton/Kitsap County. Thank you, Jackie Brown YWCA ALIVE Shelter 5/1/2007 ~A ,~+~, ( ...t'.,~~~I~~0.,:;1'r~~ Catholic COMMUNITY serVIces OF WESTERN WASHINr.mN Benedict House 250 South Cambrian Avenue Bremerton, WA 98312 Phone: (360) 405-9486 1-866-246-3642 Fax: (360) 405-9487 Providing Emergency and Transitional Housing for homeless men of Kitsap County April 27, 2007 Mayor Cary Bozeman Bremerton City Council . Norm Dick Government Center, 6th floor 345 6th Street Bremerton,WA 98337 Dear Mayor Bozeman and Bremerton City Council Members, Catholic Community Services and Benedict House would like to express our deep gratitude to Mayor Bozeman for his recommendation to share the budget surplus with our agency and other agencies not fully funded in the 2007 CDBG Awards cycle and particularly the Bremerton City Council members for their consideration and support of his recommendation. The shortage ofCDBG funds resulted in a 73% cut ($18,300) for our Benedict House program. The additional $2,000 you can provide is greatly appreciated. It is your continuing support and the support of others that enables us to provide a broad spectrum of services to the people of Kitsap County, especially homeless men. We continue to house and support up to 25 homeless men a night and we couldn't do it without the city's help. Again, thank you! Sincerely, at ~f I!~?-) t'SF / Pat Millen, OSF Kitsap Family Center Developer and Benedict House Program Director Agency of Catholic Community Services of Western Washington, Archdiocese of Seattle . Visit our website at: ccsww,org DA TE SUBMITTED: BILL # 0] - /03 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 7A ........................................................m............................... SUBJECT: Resolution No.3o" 0 adopting the 2008 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan PUBLIC HEARING Committee Meeting Date: 4/25/2007 COUNCIL MEETING Date: 5/2/2007 Department: DCD-CDBG/HOME Presenter: Marie Vila Phone: 360-473-5375 SUMMARY: The CDBG / HOME Policy Plan sets parameters for the City's management of its HUD entitlement, including outlining the citizen participation plan, application and review processes, and eligibility and implementation requirements for grant funded projects. A TT ACHMENTS: Staff Memo, proposed resolution, DRAFT 2008 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan FISCAL IMPACTS: None APPRO V ALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MA YOR: COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: CONSENT AGENDA 0 GENERAL BUSINESS 0 PUBLIC HEARING RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the 2008 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan OM..d.. f~ (~ M. 3030 " COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table o Continue 0 No Action RESOLUTION NO. 3030 A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, adopting the 2008 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan. WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton is an entitlement community which receives a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) each year from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and also receives funding from HUD's Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) fund via an interlocal agreement with Kitsap County; and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton is required to establish a Policy Plan for the City's management of its HUD entitlement, including outlining the citizen pmiicipation plan, application and review processes, and eligibility and implementation requirements for grant funded proj ects; and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton currently has an established CDBG/HOME Policy Plan which is reviewed annually, and any required changes are presented to Council for approval; and ~. ~-- ~ WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development CDBG/HOME staff recommends adopting changes to the 2007 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan which would impact the application and review process for HOME funds to make it more competitive; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The recitals and findings of fact set forth in this resolution are hereby incorporated as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. The DRAFT 2008 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan attached hereto is hereby adopted as the 2008 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan. SECTION 3. Severability. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 1 2008 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force immediately upon its passage. day of P AS SED by the City Council of the City of Bremelion, Washington this _ ,2007. WILL MAUPIN, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk R:\Legal\Legal\Resolutions\Community Development\2008 Policy Plan.doc 2 2008 CDBG/HOME Policy Plan DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM To: Bremerton City Council From: Marie Vila, CDBG/HOME Administrator Date: April 18, 2007 Re: 2008 CDBG / HOME Policy Plan The CDBG / HOME Policy Plan sets parameters for the City's management of its HUD entitlement, including outlining the citizen participation plan, application and review processes, and eligibility and implementation requirements for grant funded projects. As necessary, the CDBG / HOME Program staff reviews and makes changes to the CDBG / HOME Policy Plan. In the past few years, changes have been made and approved by Council annually. Routine changes to the Policy Plan impact funding levels and schedules, but occasionally strategic policy changes are made as well. Below is a summary of key changes to the 2008 Policy Plan: · HOME funding will be included in together with CDBG funding in the competitive selection for eligible projects/sub-grantees · The City will prioritize the use of HOME funds to Designated Blight zones, and may set aside HOME funds for future use, including for a City initiated project · Sets a maximum subsidy of $30,000 per homeowner unit created with HOME funds · Requires a match ratio of 2:1 (two dollars from other sources to each HOME dollar) · HOME applicants will have the option to request funds as a grant or as a loan If you have any questions about the proposed program, please do not hesitate to contact me at 473-5375. 1 Department of Community Development 2008 CDBG/HOME POLICY PLAN and APPLICATION FOR FUNDING 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION Contents CDBG/HOM E Pol icy Plan.... .................................. .................................. .......... i i i STAFF CONTACTS ............................................................................................ iii 2008 CDBG/HOME Allocation Schedule .......................................................... iv CDBG/HOME Public Service Citizen Advisory Committee ............................. v CDBG/HOME Capital, Planning & HOME Citizen Advisory Committee.......... v 2008 Proposed Distribution of CDBG/HOME Funds....................................... vi Citizen Participation Plan.. ................................ .............. ........................ ......... vi i Five Year Consolidated Plan ................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Other Citizen Participation Opportunities ............ Error! Bookmark not defined. PART I 2008 CDBG/HOME ALLOCATION - GENERAL INFO .........................1 PART II 2008 CDBG/HOME ALLOCATION POLiCy......................................... 6 PART III 2008 CDBG NATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND ELIGIBILITY REQS....18 PART IV 2008 CDBG/HOME APPLICATIONS.................................................. 27 _PU BLlC/H U MAN SERVICES APPLICATION.................................... ............... _PLAN N I NG APPLICATION ...... ....... ............... ................. .."...."..;'...... ............ ....... _CAPITAL PROJECTS APPLICATION .............................................................. _HOM E PROJ ECTS APPLICATION ......... ...................... .............. ............ ......... 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION 11 -:r\::~~....~~:~j "-_~[:~~} : ~_~-7;= ~:'.: :',:~.;;_.:::;~\_:~-F~. ~ ~~ :~-::'::~:~ "':'i, ;~_~:: ,:,-'..~'\ "'~':: ::~~t.'.:-"~~'~l''! ;;:~.i ~~,~~';..~:' '~/IiIQM ES7fARR;e-0NIAEvS.f;,>, ~(:::-.;~'~ "i _~!J;~, ~~t~ F) ::,.~:~~-'~'~~:'''~,-Jj~ '~~~',~ ,_f1:~~;~-;~~. ~:~':,~~:i< .'~.~~:<; ,~X~~~ ";l~~ ~:;.}~~),~l{~\. Marie Vila, Program Administrator Telephone: Fax: E-Mail: Mailing address: (360) 473-5375 (360) 473-5278 marie. vila @ ci. breme rton. wa. us City of Bremerton Department of Community Development 345 6thth Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 Program Coordinator Telephone: Fax: Mailing address: 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION (360) 473-5211 (360) 473-5278 City of Bremerton Department of Community Development 345 6th Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 III ;;?f;'~;'>D'<)/'!:;:i:'~~:::':;;';:;}2'eofraDeG<'iHoM E~'Ab~8bAml(lN:"'SiCfnf6>Hi:jfEY"~:L"T~;(~:~7i':':,~~:.d',;} :&.', ,),}; ~.~':~~ ~.~~~i~L:":,":~~~~ ~:".:~~~~ :1j:,~;~; ~:~::'~:~-'> '~r~:~\1-~:'; <j/ '~:::~:~~_ _ :~~~" -',~ '::,: "~,. ~:, :,.} i ::D ~ .1.c ;'.,,,;~~u~~:'~ -"~ ~_: ;~ '}":' -~ -; _:: ;<.~ ~'. ': ,~{::~;. "-'- _~;~~:~<,~ '.,} ,~~r~: ..,,:~:"~~~r~.~;_ ,,~__ ,Tt~:~ ,:'~,:";~':.';:j;;~~L;: ~ :':~:;:<~~:'~~~4' }.:;::2--:;~.~; :~,,~ ~~ 04/02/2007 Advertise Availability of 2008 Draft Policy Plan (Ad to be placed in The Sun) www.cLbremerton.wa.us 04/25/2007 Present Proposed 2008 Policy Plan/New Advisory Board Members at City Council Study Session, City Council Office, Suite 600 5:00PM Bremerton City Council Public Hearing on 2008 Policy Plan 345 6th Street, 5:30 PM Final 2008 Policy Plan and Application Packet Available 345 6th Street, Suite 600, DCD www.cLbremerton.wa.us Technical Assistance Meeting City Council Chambers, 345 6th Street, 1 st Floor Applications Due in City of Bremerton, by 5:00 p.m. DCD, 345 6th Street, Suite 600 (Postmark is not acceptable) Citizen Advisory Committee Member Training City Council Chambers, 345 6th Street, 1 st Floor Staff Technical Review Monday Wednesday Wednesday 05/02/2007 Friday 05/04/2007 Wednesday 06/06/2007 Friday 07/20/2007 Thursday 08/02/2007 Mon-Fri 07/23/2007 -08/17/2007 Monday 08/27/2007 Mon-Fri 09/17/2007 -09/21/2007 Friday 09/21/2007 Wednesday 09/26/2007 Tuesday 10/9/2007 Wednesday 10/10/2007 Wednesday 10/24/2007 Wednesday 11/07/2007 Friday 11/09/2007 Tuesday 01/01/2008 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION Application Package to Citizen Advisory Committees Citizen Advisory Committee Review and Interviews Citizen Advisory Committee Recommendations to DCD Staff Advertise funding recommendations and Public Comment period; funding recommendations posted on City's website Public Meeting to Comment on Funding Recommendations DCD Conference Room, 345 6th Street, 3:00 PM City Council Committee meeting on Funding Recommendations Publish DRAFT Action Plan to HUD Present Proposed 2008 Funding Recommendations at City Council Study Session, City Council Office, Suite 600 5:00PM City Council Hearing on Funding Recommendations 345 6th Street, 5:30PM Annual Action Plan to HUD Program Year Begins IV ~:~~> q. :k;ri~'h'~:';; . ^":;~~\';"~C!';~'6:.'~C:;~'I~ +':'Z:'::t:':N"';~"D' . 'V5.: 1"~ij''g~:yr;..'''itiM:':'~:M~d,'ifif,~~F;::.';r;~;?:~:~;i;;:; :;"', ." vt.1,~U rr;,~ - . .. , " _~) ~'I1l~V\ . ~1;i..> ,~'jl: ,,~< '. "'#':\ . " .; ~,^~,n :I?' b.\;;:l : ';'1, :::a-:'~el;~J.:,":-""': .-.*'~-._ t': ,: ;~'-. : t :~2;' .~,~.. .:j:'~,:;;,:_:.~~.. :'''l;-:}: ;:_~~~:L~~' ~~~2.:;~~t~{~.~'.::;:2:;'<,~..- .:2~~;/rt~:,~ ~;. ':"i~'.;,~- ':-- ~'3 '/~-.~~; >.,-l'~ ~...~ '>.r..-", /:L _, -:: \':: ';,' ~,~:' ',~ ,: ~.~~, >~, '_{. :" t~'l; .~. i __~:-~~:::_:~>:~_r:' Ji;:,; i:~~~ ~h~?t;'':~:~~ <~ '::~1t,~.:;_: -,..~;';'.~~~l~~~~'~. .:SLl: Position Term o 1 Member from the City at large \ Judy Friedberg-Nerf 1/1/06-12/31/08 · 2 Members from the West Bremerton Area Open position Faye Flemister 1/1/07-12/31/09 1/1/04-12/31/07 · 2 Members from the East Bremerton Area Barbara Mail Ronald Smith 1/1/06-12/31/08 1/1/04-12/31/07 From then on 3 year staggered terms ,:..: -~j:{~.> >._';~~;J?'~f. ;_::~lil~~'~,~~ ~:~~":"_Y:, .!,.,-':~,-.,:,~?:~ /~"~i;l~Yf;j\ ~1~':'f4~f1::'~X ".... ,€~DEMEl~0RMBN~P,1XN Dd? " '-1i!i),,1::tf_~~ {?"f::-0: ~:~ ;~'-~~;<~~~r f~ _~~'C<:-'_ 't;;~;>J.: ~':~: .~1'; ';- ?":.~ <of >: '. .~!~;~ ":_~~:{.~?"!':~~~~'11:.~ 0: ~'j;E"E"lHOM,E RIiU9JEGJiSJG" }, -;~,';!-:~' :,:.,>}l{~_;.ti ;~:",~.~ :;j;(~~~,;;,'~' : ~~ -..~:~~~~: ;e;";',;:;' -;:. -~~> ,,~~;:}. ,~__, 1'~~Jf~l: · 1 Councilmember (appointed by the Council President) Dianne Robinson 1/1/07-12/31/07 · 1 Planning Commissioner (appointed by Commission President) Open position 1/1/07 -12/31/07 Three Community Members appointed by the Mayor: · 1 Member from the City at large Joyce Davison 1/1/06-12/31/08 · 1 Member from the West Bremerton Area Anne Strange 1/1/06-12/31/08 G 1 Member from the East Bremerton Area Mike Eversole 1/1/04-12/31/07 From then on 3 year staggered term 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION v - ^":}_~"'"', ,_ ~ _ " >:k~lV.:i~;~~~:I:~~~~?F;~~f::~~~::_ :~"'t: "';:::~f.-~':, ~ .:~<~. '~.~\t:: :~-.;.--<.<~ ':~.. : - :/~~, _-",..~.~.,._~ :>:., _, ,~~,:->':':;:>.,c.::. ,::' ,>:;.i:_(!r~ :E~'~~:'~"~,;~-- j 4-'>~-_ "~';-:..'~' __r--:.:" :~'-5,:>-' ~ ~<~ . ,;;,::'~",~'; ~::: ~ "",~<, · 8',PAepOSE.[) IDISTRIBlJrIQN,()p.€Il).BGFLJNDS '-"',', ;.'.>;,,"". -L(t; ~~. ~,~~~;{'~~-:f:'::~ :,~:~ :'~2 t~__ ?~"~ ~~_~:~":~~!i ~.,1::'_: ~, ,'~ ;_.:;~~~_,._,.- :~:~: :~-::~~{_.: :'~ ~,J.{,. :~: ;~,~ '-::, ~;'--~{--'2-~ ~;_ _' };~~ :~. \..:~" _~'~:'_~1~ ~ ,:~.t::_'Z ~. :J:;'.:'.;' :,"-~_",:-, ;~~'~',/,: ,'~ ~~;::::_:~~\~':_'::'~f: ,- ::.~ ",:"~', ~ ' - '- :':'; '.' .L:.~::_~: ~'.\;;: _ Estimated Funding Available for the 2008 COBG Allocation Process Tentative Estimate of 2008 Entitlement Tentative Program Income (PI) Available Total Entitlement + PI 524,000 20,000 544,000 Reallocated Funds prior year projects: Total Available for allocation o 544,000 Available for 2006 Public Service (15% of entitlement + PI ) Available for COB DCD 2006 Planning and Admin (20% of entitlement + PI) Available for Capital Projects and Economic Development ( 65% of entitlement + PI + recaptured capital project funds) Total Entitlement + PI 81,600 108,800 353,600 544,000 2007 HOME Allocation 2007 Program Income 2008 HOME Allocation Total Entitlement + PI 422,250 63,897 422,250 1,067,790 Available for American Dream Downpayment Initiative (2006, 2007) Available for COB DCD Planning and Admin (10% of 2006-2007 entitlement, after ADDI) Available for CHDO Projects (15% of 2007 & 2008 entitlement) Available for COB Down Payment Assistance Program commitment Available for any HOME Project Total Entitlement + PI 17,000 82,750 .124,125 100,000 743,915 1,067,790 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION VI '>':;';' ~~;L~j.! ~~' i~ '~"~:-<: -~:; ':-: ,;. "i'_.; ~ 5:" ~}t{ ?-'~~ ,:.7 .: ,~~:: :'~>~ '=:'~: - . ~.'~ ;_ ~>:.{ :_.~ "~:',_>_ :_~:~ ,': ~:~'_) -\ ,:;T,7~;-~~~:\:;,,~'{;:;;;:~ ::~:~.~~~::",-:t~.;~,:;,~;. ,-;:t;::~;:~,~~':~,_',~- Z":~': '<~~l<:> ~~ '-;::; ." ~1::r1IZEN BA'RliIGIRAI'IQNRL.~N >" q'q . p,'h_""',,. ;C.o' 'i},~~:t~~~;~,~ j ':-~~~:~1._?~~,~~~i ",~'~~:_~'~j" :o.~: ~~~: ,~,~ .,:'~~;;~~~_J.~~' --~_'~-,':' :~,'~,~, ,~;.,.~;i:,:~j"';!;._~_:1. ::.: i;~~- ~~,'~'~.:~~~:i~,;}-)ij~,~~~.::~~f~:~~~=:t::~~~;~;:~~~i2i~~~~~~;:'k;~;~~:{~~~;:~~i INTRODUCTION The City of Bremerton has received federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for over 20 years. During the period 1992 through 1995 the City deferred its status to allow Kitsap County to become an urban county entitlement. The City regained its entitlement status in 1996. The City has formed a consortium with Kitsap County for the period of 2005-2008 and beyond under the HOME program in order to better assure the receipt of funds. Each year the City of Bremerton is eligible to receive CDBG and HOME funds. There are specific rules and regulations governing the allocation and use of the funds, including provisions for citizen involvement in decision making. The City of Bremerton is committed to assuring opportunities for citizen involvement in decisions concerning activities taking place within their communities. The citizen participation plan outlines opportunities for citizen involvement in community development and housing programs. While the citizen participation plan gives citizens maximum opportunity to participate in the planning, implementation and assessment of housing and community development programs, final authority for development, modification and execution of programs lies with the Bremerton City Council. APPLICABLE PROGRAMS The programs covered by the citizen participation plan are the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and the HOME Program. PURPOSE The purpose of the Citizen Participation Plan is to provide an ongoing mechanism to ensure widespread citizen participation whereby all citizens have an opportunity to fully express their needs and wishes for community improvement. Special efforts will be made to encourage participation of: low and moderate income persons, particularly those living in slum and blighted areas and residents of predominately low and moderate income neighborhoods. minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities. This plan provides opportunities for representation of all of the citizens of the City of Bremerton by allowing them to have a voice in the decision-making process and giving them greater power and control over activities taking place within their communities. 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION Vll DEIFINITDONS CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEES (CAC) Two five-member committees established by the Mayor consisting of citizens representing East and West Bremerton and the City at-large. The Citizen Advisory Committees assist the Department of Community Development in reviewing CDBG and HOME applications, interviewing applicants and recommending annual project allocation decisions to the Bremerton City Council. One committee recommends funding for Public Service activities and is fully comprised of appointees by the Mayor. The other recommends funding for Capital, Economic Development and Planning projects. Two of its five committee members are appointed ex officio from the City Council and the Planning Commission, and the other three are appointees of the Mayor. COMMUNITY OR PUBLIC MEETING A meeting hosted by the Department of Community Development to obtain citizens' views and opinions concerning planning, implementation, or assessment of activities. At least ten days before any scheduled meeting, the date, location and time will be advertised in The Kitsap Sun and on the City's website at www.ci.bremerton.wa.us. KITSAP REGIONAL COORDINATING COUNCIL (KRCC) Comprised of three Kitsap County Commissioners and the Mayors of Port Orchard and Poulsbo, Mayors and City Council Representatives from BremertOrl and Bainbridge Island, and representatives of the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe and Suquamish Tribe. The KRCC is responsible for establishing policies for the overall administration of the HOME program. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (DCD) The City of Bremerton Department of Community Development. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE MEETING A meeting hosted by the Department of Community Development to inform citizens and funding applicants of technical aspects of the CDBG and HOME programs and to review application requirements for the upcoming year. At least ten days before the scheduled meeting, the date, location and time will be advertised in The Kitsap Sun and on the City's website at www.ci.bremerton.wa.us. PUBLIC HEARING A hearing hosted by the Bremerton City Council. Notice of public hearings will be published in accordance with the City's policy for publishing notices. Whenever practical, the DCD will publish a notice of the hearing in The Kitsap Sun and on the City's website if it relates to the programs covered under this plan. 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION V 111 Five Year Consolidated Plan The Consolidated Plan is the result of a process set forth by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to provide a planning and application process for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs within a single document. The Kitsap County HOME Consortium is required to submit the Consolidated Plan for the HOME participating jurisdiction (which consists of Kitsap County and the City of Bremerton). The Consolidated Plan, which is in place until 2010, is available online at http://www.cLbremerton.wa.us/displav.php?id=790 or a copy can be requested from the City of Bremerton Department of Community Development. There are a number of specific elements in the Consolidated Plan, including: an assessment of housing needs (primarily of low and moderate income people) and needs of homeless people; an analysis of the City of Bremerton and Kitsap County's housing market; a discussion of the City of Bremerton and Kitsap County's strategies, priority needs, and objectives for housing and community development activities; and two action plans, one that describes the activities Kitsap County will undertake to address priority needs during the next program year utilizing HOME, CDBG, and Public Housing Comprehensive Grant funds and one that describes the activities the City of Bremerton will undertake to address priority needs during the next program year utilizing CDBG funds. Governments, service providers, citizens, and non-profiVprofit agencies are encouraged to identify needs and priorities, assist in the development of strategies," and to participate in the annual allocation process. Following are specific opportunities available for citizens to participate in the development of the information to be incorporated in the Consolidated Plan, which is updated every five years. 1. At least one community meeting will be held to obtain the views of citizens, public agencies, and other interested parties concerning housing and community development needs, including non-housing community development needs and priorities during development of the plan. 2. The Department of Community Development will specifically consult with appropriate social service agencies regarding the housing and community development needs and priorities of children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, homeless persons and other persons served by such agencies. 3. The Department of Community Development will coordinate with the Bremerton Housing Authority (BHA) and Kitsap County Consolidated Housing Authority (KCCHA) to encourage participation of residents of public and assisted housing and other low income residents of targeted revitalization areas, in the process of developing and implementing the Consolidated Plan. 4. Agencies working with low and moderate income persons, particularly those living in slum and blighted areas and residents of predominately low and moderate income neighborhoods, minorities, non-English speaking persons, and persons with disabilities will be contacted to encourage participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan. 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION IX Annual Allocation Process I Action Plan Submission The City of Bremerton conducts a competitive annual process to determine allocation of CDBG and HOME funds. The public is encouraged to participate in the process and its end product, the submission of an annual Action Plan to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1. The Department of Community Development will place an advertisement in The Kitsap Sun announcing the acceptance of applications for funding under the HOME/CDBG program. 2. At least one mandatory technical assistance training will be held within the City of Bremerton. During the meetings, the Community Development Department will provide information to citizens concerning who can apply for funds, funds expected to be available, the estimated amount of funds that will benefit low and moderate income persons, the range of activities that may be undertaken, priorities for funding, application submission requirements, the application deadline, and how decisions concerning funding will be made. Applications will be made available in a format accessible to persons with disabilities upon request. Applications may be obtained from, and must be submitted to, the City of Bremerton Department of Community Development, 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337-1873. 360-473-5375. Applications are also available on the City of Bremerton website: http://www.ci.bremerton.wa.us/displav . php? id=864 Staff at the Department of Community Development is available to provide technical assistance to citizens and organizations concerning the submission of applications. The Department of Community Development will review applications to determine compliance with technical requirements. The Citizen Advisory Committee will review all proposals and interview applicants. 3. Applicants are encouraged to take part in a review of their application by appointment no later than two weeks before the application due date. This review will be conducted by DCD staff and cover only the technical requirements of the application. 4. Applicants will be interviewed by the Citizens Advisory Committee. 5. Applicants submitting proposals will be notified in writing whether or not the Citizen Advisory Committee has recommended their proposal for funding. The notification will include the date, time and place of the public hearing before the Bremerton City Council. 6. A summary of the draft Action Plan will be published in The Kitsap Sun and on the City's website, and copies will be available at public libraries listed in the resource section of this plan and the City of Bremerton office. The summary will describe the contents and purpose of the action plan, and include a list of locations where copies of the entire proposed plan may be examined, along with the date, location, and time of the Bremerton City Council Public Hearing to adopt the plan. Citizens will be 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION x provided a period of at least 30 days to review and comment on the plan. Comments or views of citizens will be considered at the public hearing, and a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons therefore, will be attached to the final consolidated plan which will be submitted to HUD. 5. The Department of Community Development will submit the Action Plan, including the projects proposed to be funded, to the Department of Housing and Urban Development no later than November 30th of each calendar year. 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION Xl Other Citizen Participation Opportunities IMPLEMENTATION Each CDBG / HOME funded program is unique and may receive some form of citizen involvement during the implementation phase. Each project is subject to citizen involvement but will use a form appropriate to the project's purpose. AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Citizens will be notified and have an opportunity to comment on any substantial changes or amendments proposed to the Annual Action Plan. A substantial change which requires an amendment to the final statement consists of: A change in the amount to be expended on a project equal to a 10% increase or decrease to the total CDBG/HOME allocation in a specific project. Canceling an approved project or adding a new project. A change to the purpose, scope, location or beneficiaries of the project as defined in the application for funds. Amendments to the Action Plan will be recommended by the DCD and acted upon by the City of Bremerton City Council at a regularly scheduled Public Hearing. Notice of the proposed amendment will be published in The Sun and on the City's website at least thirty (30) days prior to the Public Hearing to allow for public comment prior to implementation of the proposed amendment. Comments or vie\ivs- of citizens will be considered at the public hearing, and a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons therefore, will be attached to the substantial amendment of the final consolidated plan which will be submitted to HUD. Any request for a change in the amount to be expended equal to or less than 10% increase or decrease to the CDBG/HOME allocation in a specific project shall not be considered a substantial amendment requiring citizen notification. However, prior written consent of the CDBG Administrator is required. The change must be submitted by the grantee in writing and shall specifically state the reasons for the requested increase or decrease. All budget requests will be reviewed and approved or denied by the CDBG / HOME Program Administrator. PERFORMANCE REPORTS 1. The City of Bremerton will prepare and submit a Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) to HUD no later than April 15th of each year for the previous calendar year. 2. Availability of the CAPER for public review will be published in The Kitsap Sun and copies will be available on the City's website, at public libraries listed in the resource section of this plan and at the City of Bremerton office. 3. Citizens will be provided a period of at least 15 days to review and comment on the CAPER. Comments or views of citizens will be considered in the report, and a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons therefore, will be attached to the CAPER and submitted to HUD. 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION Xl1 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Any citizen may contact the Department of Community Development for technical assistance in relation to programs described in this Plan. The Department will help citizens understand CDBG and HOME funded programs, the procedures for submitting proposals, the Citizen Participation Plan and other program requirements so they can effectively participate in CDBG /HOME programs and the funding process. COMPLAINTS All written citizen complaints will be referred to the appropriate person(s) or agencies for action. Under normal circumstances, the Department of Community Development will respond to the person making the complaint within 15 days. All complaints and responses will be kept on file. DISPLACEMENT Proposals for CDBG and HOME funded projects that are likely to cause displacement of people or businesses are discouraged. Any proposal for funds that is likely to cause displacement must include relocation assistance payments in the budget. Relocation assistance must be provided consistent with the federal Uniform Relocation Act. EFFECTIVE DATE This plan became effective January 1, 1996, and will remain in effect as long as Community Development Block Grant activities are ongoing oruritil superseded or modified by a new plan. RESOURCES If you have questions concerning the programs identified, or would like copies of this plan or any related Federal regulations, please contact: CDBG Program Administrator: City of Bremerton 345 6th Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 (360)473-5211. A copy of policies described in this plan will be available for review at the following Library: Bremerton 1301 Sylvan Way Bremerton, WA 98310 (360) 377-7601 A notification will be placed in the following newspaper which is the paper of record at least ten days before a public meeting is held concerning a program described in this plan: The Kitsap Sun 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION X11l Notices may also be published on the City's website www.cLbremerton.wa.us. The notice will indicate when and where the public meeting will be held. Meetings are often held at the following location Norm Dicks Government Center 345 6th Street Bremerton, W A The following local planning department may be contacted concerning planning issues: City of Bremerton Department of Community Development Andrea Spencer, Director 345 6th Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 360-473-5283 ~-- t;'I., 2008 CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION XIV CDBG and HOME funds are Federal funds. Use of Federal funds may affect the way your agency does business. If you are applying for Federal funds for the first time, you are strongly encouraged to meet with CDBG staff to discuss Federal regulations. What is the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program? · The program is authorized by Title I of the Community Development Act of 1974. Federal funds are provided to local governments to assist in the development of decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities primarily for persons of low and moderate income. CDBG funds must be used for activities determined by the federal government to be eligible, however the local government determines which eligible use is appropriate in the community. · The City of Bremerton is an "entitlement city" and receives an annual CDBG allocation from the federal government. The City accepts applications from various organizations to implement CDBG activities. · Each application, at a minimum must meet the three threshold requirements. It must: 1) be implemented by an eligible applicant/recipient; 2) be eligible under the CDBG program requirements (24 CFR parts 570.201-270.207); 3) meet one of the three national objectives; and 4) be complete as of the due date. How much money is available? See page vi for funding and distribution information Who is an eligible applicanUrecipient? Eligible applicant/recipients include: City departments Other local public agencies Public and private nonprofit organizations (501 (c)(3) Section 301 (d) small business investment companies Local Community Based Development Organizations as described in 24 CFR 270.204(c) Private for- profit organizations may implement certain economic development and micro enterprise activities. Faith based organizations consistent with the President's initiative Additionally applicants must: · Demonstrate an active governing body or board of directors with skills and experience to provide oversight, leadership and direction to the agency; Demonstrate the legal, financial, and programmatic ability to administer the proposed project; and, · Meet the City's requirements for contracting agencies such as insurance requirements, audit and financial requirements. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 1 What are the three National Objectives? An eligible CDBG activity must either: Principally benefit low and very low income households; Reduce or prevent slum and blight; or, Meet an urgent need The National Objectives are included in the CDBG regulations at 24 CFR 570.208 and described in detail in Part III of this package. What are eligible activities? Eligible activities are defined in the CDBG program regulations at 24 CFR 570.201- 570.207. More information concerning eligible activities, and special circumstances relating to the activities, can be found in Part III of this package. A list of some of the activities follows: . Acquisition of real property by purchase, lease or donation · Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or installation of public facilities and improvements · Code enforcement in deteriorated or deteriorating areas Clearance, demolition and removal and rehabilitation of buildings and improvements · Removal of material and architectural barriers in certain situations · Public services (including labor, supplies and materials) including but not limited to those concerned with employment, crime prevention, child care, health, drug abuse, education, energy conservation, welfare or recreation needs Planning activities Assistance to Community Based Development Organizations (CBDO) to carry out projects · Assistance to carry out economic development projects · Housing services such as housing counseling and energy auditing - --" · Assistance to facilitate and expand homeownership opportunities for low and very low income people · Lead based paint hazard evaluation and reduction The following activities generally are not eligible for CDBG funding: New residential housing construction, except in special circumstances Regular government operations · Buildings such as city halls, police stations, or other buildings primarily for the general conduct of government · Income payments such as payments to individuals or families for food, clothing, or rent, except in certain circumstances · Political activities · Vehicles and/or Equipment Are there rules or regulations that I should consider when thinking about submitting an application? All projects are subject to environmental review, civil rights compliance, and procurement requirements. Some of the other things that may affect the amount you request, and your project, are labor standards, relocation, local hire, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and audit requirements. What constitutes a complete application? All required elements are included and complete. No changes of any kind will be permitted after the application due date. Applicants are encouraged to take part in a review of their application by appointment no later than two weeks before the application due date. This CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 2 review will be conducted by DCD staff and cover only the technical requirements of the application The application must meet HUD's three Threshold Requirements: o The applicant is eligible as of the application due date. o The project or activity addresses a National Objective (for CDBG applications) o The project or activity is eligible under the CDBG or HOME program. How do I apply? Complete an application and submit by the application due date to: CDBG / HOME Programs City of Bremerton Department of Community Development 345 6th Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, W A 98337 Eligible applicants will be required to take part in an interview with the Citizen Advisory Committee.. Please check the 2008 CDBG/HOME Allocation Schedule on page iv for specific dates and times. How do I get help with the application? Attend the mandatory pre-application Technical Assistance workshop. Please check the 2008 CDBG/HOME Allocation Schedule on page iv for specific dates and locations. Call Marie Vila at 360-473-5375 for more information. How will applications be reviewed and projects selected? DCD staff will review the application to assure it is complete, the applicant and project meet the threshold requirements, and the project is consistent with the Consolidated Plan. Projects not meeting the threshold requirements will be disqualified and not considered for funding. Such projects will not be rated. A Citizens Advisory Committee appointed by the Mayor will review public service applications, interview applicants, rate and rank the projects utilizing the process outlined in Part II, and present their recommendation to the Bremerton City Council. A separate Committee, consisting of appointees by the Mayor plus one member of the City Council and one member of the Planning Commission, will similarly review Capital, Economic Development, Planning, and HOME applications. A public hearing will be held and the Bremerton City Council will make the final decision concerning activities to be recommended for funding in the 2008 Action Plan. The 2008 Action Plan will be sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) no later than November 30,2007 for approval. When will funds be available? Funding is dependent on the federal HUD budget being ratified. In "normal" years this is by March. We will not be able to sign contracts with sub recipients until we receive a contract from HUD. Remember the budget is an estimate; we will not know the actual amount until after HUD's budget is approved. Certain funds can be committed to projects after the first of the year; please contact CDBG staff with any questions. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 3 What is the HOME Program? The HOME Investment Partnerships Program was created by the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 (NAHA). The Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 ; the Multifamily Property Disposition Act of 1994 made important changes to the Program. The intent of the HOME Program is to: o Expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing; o Strengthen the abilities of state and local governments to provide housing; o Expand the capacity of nonprofit community based housing development organizations; o Leverage private sector participation in financing affordable housing. HOME funded projects are subject to many of the same requirements as CDBG, such as environmental review, civil rights compliance, and procurement requirements. Some of the other things that may affect the amount you request, and your project, are labor standards, relocation, local hiring requirements, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and audit requirements. Contact DCD staff early in your project with questions regarding these requirements. HOME funds also carry many requirements specific to the HOME program. These requirements and regulations can be found at 24 CFR Part 92. If you have a HOME project in mind, it is recommended you meet with City CDBG/HOME staff early on to make sure it would qualify under the HOME program. How much money is available? Please refer to page vi for general funding and distribution information. HOME rules for affordable housing set the maximum subsidy for each unit at the Section 221 (d)(3) limit. This limit is set by HUD's Office of Multi-Family Housing Programs.This limit is currently set at $131,753 per unit. In addition, the City of Bremerton has a maximum per-unit subsidy limit for homeownership projects of $30,000 per unit for all types of units. Match Contribution The City of Bremerton also requires HOME projects to leverage other funding. The city requires a minimum leveraging ratio of 1 :2, or two dollars of other funding for every HOME dollar requested. The 1:2 match ratio may be applied to the entire project, not just to the HOME subsidized units. How do I apply? Complete an application and submit by the application due date to: CDBG / HOME Programs City of Bremerton Department of Community Development 345 6th Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, W A 98337 Eligible applicants will be required to take part in an interview with the Citizen Advisory Committee.. Please check the 2008 CDBG/HOME Allocation Schedule on page iv for specific dates and times. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 4 What are the City's Priorities for Use of HOME funds? The City will give priority to HOME projects located in the Anderson Cove and Downtown Designated Blight Zones (please contact the Department of Community Development for a map of these areas). In the absence of qualified, viable projects that fit the City's vision, the City Council may elect to set aside HOME funds for future use, including for a City-initiated affordable housing project. What is the Process for allocation of HOME funds? Applicants will use the HOME application format (attached). Please check the 2008 CDBG/HOME Allocation Schedule for specific due dates and times. DCD staff will review the application to ensure it is complete, the applicant and project meet the threshold requirements, and the project is consistent with the Consolidated Plan. Projects not meeting the threshold requirements will be disqualified and not considered for funding. Such projects will not be rated. The Citizens Advisory Committee responsible for reviewing Capital, Economic Development and Planning applications will also review HOME applications, interview applicants, rate and rank the projects utilizing the process outlined in Part II, and present their recommendation to the Bremerton City Council. A public hearing will be held and the Bremerton City Council will make the final decision concerning activities to be recommended for funding in the 2008 Action Plan. The 2008 Action Plan will be sent to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by the end of November preceding the program year for approval. Where do I get more information? Call Betsy Howe at 473-5211 or Marie Vila at 473-5375 if you are interested in applying for funds under the HOME Program. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 5 ;. ;>:c~Qo'f,i~:rjB'G~i!MQ'M.Ef7i.i[rd'cAfjo~j...ERt)I}12~:F:':;F,~~:l~,~~(;:, ~:~'!;~,::. 1O<~:~,,, .<~;C;1;-1~-!_- ~\ '., 1~~~:.". .::'.';;:^:_ <~~". ',,'.':;_<> ;~.: " .-,~"' '!;,,^ _ -;~:. -': ~. ,:~ ;,_~?,~~ -. ~:::}:'" "-:.?~~:~):~~'- ': :i;;:;-., ~ .:'!..fj~JJ:,~,=-?'~;:~;~~;~:".C~.~:: jl:~;,;,;-" .'.~:~~f" ., ,L ' How will CDSG funds be distributed among various eligible activities? Funds available for various eligible CDBG activities are determined by Federal regulations and local priorities. · Federal regulations limit the amount of funds which can be allocated to public service projects to 15% of the annual CDBG entitlement, plus 15% of the program income received during the City's immediately preceding program year. The City receives program income from the revolving housing loan program. These funds do not impact the annual CDBG allocation. The amount available for public services will be 15% of the federal allocation. · The amount of funds that can be allocated to planning and administration projects, including the overall administration of the City of Bremerton's CDBG Program, is limited to 20% of the annual grant. · Federal regulations require that a minimum of 70% of the annual grant funds go to projects that directly benefit low and moderate income persons; the City's goal is for 100% of CDBG funding to benefit low and moderate income persons. How will HOME funds be distributed among various eligible activities? The amount of funds that can be allocated to the overall administration of the HOME Program is limited to 10% of the annual grant. Becau_s~Jlle City and Kitsap County are joined in a consortium, the City's administrative costs are limited to 5% of the annual grant, with 5% allocated to Kitsap County for overall administration. 90% of the City's annual HOME grant will be allocated on a competitive basis to eligible affordable housing projects in the City of Bremerton; at least 15% will be allocated to activities undertaken by Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs). · Program income from the City's Downpayment Assistance Program, funded with HOME funds from past years, will be primarily used to fund new Downpayment Assistance loans for low and moderate income first time homebuyers in the City of Bremerton. Funds allocated under both the CDBG and HOME programs must meet one of the priorities identified in the Kitsap County Consortium Consolidated Plan for 2006 through 2010. The City of Bremerton and Kitsap County are joined as a consortium in order to receive HOME funds. The Consolidated Plan identifies five general priorities related to housing, homeless, and non-housing community needs to be addressed with Federal funds. Please note, that activities that are included in the plan may not be prioritized in the City's Policy Plan. The Consolidated Plan can be viewed in its entirety online at: http://www.cLbremerton.wa.us/displav.php?id=790. The Consolidated Plan priorities are listed below (the order listed does not establish any categorical priority): CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 6 1. Homelessness To ensure that decent, accessible, affordable, and suitable housing is available in the County and Cities and to support services that meet the needs of individuals and families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness, the Kitsap County community will: * Provide a variety of decent and safe emergency transitional and affordable permanent housing; * Provide adequate support through coordinated systems of: resources, outreach, assessment, case management, provider collaboration, homelessness prevention, and rental assistance; . Provide critical supportive services to support housing options for the homeless. 2. Special Needs Populations* To ensure that suitable, effective assistance is available for vulnerable persons in special needs populations who are in need of housing, support or care services, the Kitsap County community will: . Maintain, improve and increase effective services and suitable housing; . Ensure effective service delivery and housing availability through supportive ordinances and regulations; . Support efforts to develop an entry system for special population clients that ensures links with appropriate diagnosis, placement, suppo~ ~n9 treatment; . Increase and maintain the availability of effective, timely life skills training and work preparation to promote self sufficiency. 'Special Needs Populations include individuals falling into one or more of the following categories: elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (severe mental, physical, developmental), persons living with HIV/AIDS, persons fleeing domestic violence, persons with alcohol or other drug addiction. 3. HousinQ To ensure access to affordable, decent, safe and appropriate transitional and permanent housing for all individuals and families, the Kitsap County community will: . Increase the stock of affordable rental units throughout the County and City through preservation, rehabilitation and construction . Increase the number of new homeowners among low/moderate income individuals and families through fair housing efforts, education, housing counseling, financial assistance and affordable construction; . Improve and retain existing housing stock through preservation, rehabilitation, weatherization, accessibility and planning efforts; . Support education and training that builds community awareness of lead-based paint hazards and incorporate new studies and regulations into any planning for mitigation; . Improve the safety and livability of neighborhoods through revitalization and/or demolition of inappropriate or dilapidated structures; CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 7 ~ Promote equal treatment of all who seek homeownership by removing impediments to fair housing. 4. Community Development To ensure the safe livability of neighborhoods, the preservation of important facilities, public access to facilities and services, and planning activities, that primarily benefit low-income persons, the Kitsap County community will: . Support a continuum of social and health services for low/moderate income persons in Kitsap County; . Provide suitable access to all public buildings in the cities and County; + Support planning and projects that preserve or increase housing for low income and moderate income populations; . Support local efforts toward solving public facility needs, especially those identified in community wide planning efforts; ~ Meet urgent Community Development needs, which pose a serious and immediate risk to public health or safety. 5. Economic Development To ensure a thriving community, with livable wage jobs and long-term economic and social viability, the Kitsap County community will: . Support creation and retention of livable wage jobs, and essential job preparation skills; . Assist low-income individuals who wish to establish, expand or stabilize a small business by providing loans and supportive technical assistance and training; + Revisit existing economic development plans and modify them as necessary to develop and maintain infrastructures that encourage living wage jobs; . Encourage and foster new businesses offering living wage jobs in the County. What are the other policies and regulations that apply? COBG and HOME funds are Federal funds. Use of Federal funds may affect the way your agency does business. If you are applying for Federal funds for the first time, you are strongly encouraged to meet with COBG I HOME staff to discuss Federal regulations. . Consistency with applicable City. County. and/or State Codes and Policies To be considered for funding, projects must be consistent with adopted codes and other applicable policies, plans and standards. . Approval of the Implementinj:l Aj:lencv Proposals submitted by applicants other than the Agency, City or County Department that will implement them must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate implementing Agency, City, or County Department prior to submittal. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 8 ~ Leqallv Bindinq Public Interest in CDBG I HOME Assisted Property HUD requires that facilities acquired, constructed or improved with CDBG and/or HOME funds be "publicly owned" and that the CDBG / HOME public interest be protected. The public (CDBG / HOME) interest will be secured, when appropriate, through a lien on the property recorded as a deed of trust, and a promissory note explaining the sale and change of use provisions that accompany CDBG / HOME assisted real property. The specific terms and conditions of the public interest security agreements will vary depending on the type of project assisted. . Restrictions on the Chanqe-of-Use of CDBG I HOME Assisted Property All CDBG recipients must agree to restrict the use of the property to the intended purpose for which the funds were awarded for a minimum of 5 years after close out of the project. This is to ensure compliance with HUD requirements restricting the change in use of property acquired, constructed or improved with CDBG assistance, and to ensure continued public benefit. All HOME assisted properties must provide public benefit during a designated Period of Affordability as described in 24 CFR part 92 F. . Restriction on Assessments CDBG funds may not be used for public improvement projects where a portion of the projects is to be financed by assessments to area property owners, unless the project is structured such that CDBG funds are used to pay the assessments of all low and very low income property owners. The analysis of incomes of affected persons must be done ahead of time and submitted as part of the application for CDBG funds. . Guidelines for Evaluation and Selectinq Economic Development Proiects The City of Bremerton will utilize the guidelines provided at 24 CFR 570.209 relative to project costs and financial requirements and standards for evaluating public benefit. . Equal Opportunity All CDBG proposals must comply with federal, state, local laws, and executive orders which prohibit discrimination on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, marital status, or the presence of any disability. Discrimination is prohibited in the provision of a service or facility funded with CDBG / HOME funds, and in all other aspects of administering a CDBG / HOME proposal including contracting, procurement, and employment. . Minimizinq the Loss of Low and Very Low Income Dwellinq Units Any CDBG / HOME proposal that would directly result in any occupied or vacant low and very low income dwelling units being (1) demolished, or (2) converted to a use other than as low and very low income housing must include a realistic plan to provide replacement housing within three years of the commencement of the demolition or rehabilitation relating to conversion. . Minimizinq Displacement and Providinq Relocation Assistance It is the policy of the City of Bremerton CDBG / HOME Program to discourage CDBG / HOME proposals that would cause displacement of people or businesses. Any proposal for CDBG / HOME funds that is likely to cause displacement must include CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 9 relocation assistance payments in the budget. Relocation assistance must be provided consistent with the federal Uniform Relocation Act. + Federal WaQe Rates (Davis-Bacon) Pursuant to the Davis-Bacon Act, federal wage rates apply to almost all construction projects over $2,000. Applications that involve construction must consider Davis- Bacon wage rates in the budget. There are few exceptions to the Davis-Bacon Act such as public agency use of force account crews and the rehabilitation of single family homes and small multi-family buildings. . Federal Audit Requirements Private non-profit agencies expending $500,000 or more in federal funds annually (whether CDBG / HOME alone or CDBG / HOME in conjunction with other federal funds) must have an annual audit conducted by an independent auditor in accordance with OMB A-133 Audit Standards for Private Non-Profit Organizations. Agencies are responsible to meet this audit requirement. . Environmental Review All CDBG / HOME projects must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA clearance must be obtained from the City of Bremerton and/or Kitsap County before any funds are committed in a CDBG / HOME funded project. . Lead-Based Paint Abatement .- 1Il. Any proposed homeownership, rental housing, rehabilitation or acquisition project that involves a (1) pre-1978 structure, and (2) would likely house a child age 6 or less must be informed of the possible hazards of lead based paint and a plan must be developed for addressing the presence of lead based paint under 24 CFR 35.105. Costs for abatement must be included in the rehabilitation budget. . SupplantinQ Federal regulations prohibit using CDBG / HOME funds to supplant (replace or substitute for) local funds for public services or ongoing responsibilities of general local government. The intent of this federal regulation is to prevent local government from using the availability of federal CDBG / HOME dollars as an excuse to reduce local funding commitments. . Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) The ABA requires certain buildings or other facilities that receive Federal funds to be designed, constructed or altered in accordance with standards that insure accessibility to, and use by physically handicapped people. The ADA provides comprehensive civil rights to individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, public accommodations, State and local government services, and telecommunications. It further requires that facilities for first occupancy are readily accessible and that architectural and structural barriers are removed when possible in existing facilities. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 10 . Family Policy Principles In the early 1990s the State of Washington conducted a number of focus groups throughout the State. Approximately 400 people, who were receiving human services at the time were asked to describe the characteristics of services that would be most effective for them. The Family Policy Principles reflect their collective response, and form the basis for the Washington State Human Service Policy. The principles, which have been incorporated in the rating of applications, are listed next: Family-oriented services and supports that: o Respond to the changing nature of families; CI Respond to what individuals and families say they need, and o Meet those needs in a way that maintains their dignity and respects their choices. Culturally relevant services and supports that: · Explicitly recognize the culture and beliefs of each family and use these as resources on behalf of the family; · Provide equal access to culturally unique communities in planning and programs, and day-to-day work, and actively address instances where clearly disproportionate needs exist; and o Enhance every culture's ability to achieve self-sufficiency and contribute in a productive way to the larger community. Coordinated services that: · Develop strategies and skills for collaborative planning, problem solving, and service delivery; · Encourage coordination and innovation by providing both formal and informal ways for people to communicate and collaborate in planning and programs; · Allow clients, vendors, community people, and other agencies to creatively provide the most effective, responsive, and flexible services; and · Commit to an open exchange of skills and information; and expect people throughout the system to treat each other with respect, dignity, and understanding. Locally planned services and supports that: · Operate on the belief that each community has special characteristics, needs and strengths; · Include a cross-section of local community partners from the public and private sectors, in the planning and delivery of services and supports; and · Support these partners in addressing the needs of their communities through both short range and long range planning and in establishing priorities within state and federal standards. Community based prevention that: · Encourages and supports state residents to create positive conditions in their communities to promote the well being of families and reduce crises and the need for future services. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE11 Outcome-based services and supports that: tl Include a fair and realistic system for measuring both short-range and long-range progress and determining whether efforts make a difference; G Use outcomes and indicators that reflect the goals that communities establish for themselves and their children; o Works towards these goals and outcomes at all staff levels and in every agency; and o Provide a mechanism for informing the development of program policies. Customer service that: o Provides a climate that empowers staff to deliver quality programs and services; o Is provided by courteous, sensitive, and competent professionals; and tl Uphold the dignity and respect of individuals and families by providing appropriate staff recognition, information, training, skills and support. Creativity that: o Increases the flexibility of funding and programs to promote innovation in planning, development, and provision of quality services; and simplifies and reduces or eliminates rules that are barriers to coordination and quality services How will Projects be selected for funding? All applications will be reviewed and rated against the City of Bremerton policies for the use of these funds. The Review Team, which will consist of CDBG program staff, the City Auditor, and a Citizens' Advisory Committee, will review the submission requirements, agency capacity, and the program/project. An interview with the-- €itizens' Advisory Committee will also be considered. The review process is summarized below: Step 1 - Submission Requirements CDBG / HOME Staff will review the application to ensure: · Application is complete. NOTE: No changes or additions will be allowed after the due date. Refer to the 2008 CDBG/HOME Allocation Schedule on page iv for due dates and times. · Applicant meets eligibility requirements as of the application due date. · Project or activity addresses a national objective (for CDBG projects) · Project or activity is eligible under the CDBG / HOME program(s). . Project is consistent with the Consolidated Plan and Priority Needs. Step 2 - Technical review A review team, composed of CDBG staff and the City Auditor, will review the orqanizational capacity of the agency (see rating sheet on page 14), and the fiscal capacity of the agency (see rating sheet on page 15). Performance records of previous CDBG or HOME recipients will also be considered. Results of this review will be shared with the applicants and with the Citizens' Advisory Committee before interviews. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 12 Step 3 - Project Proposal Review and Interviews The Citizens' Advisory Committee (CAC) assigned to each group of projects will review all applications, meet with CDBG staff to review technical scoring, and conduct agency interviews. They will consider Priority Needs, project and agency effectiveness and readiness, Family Policy Principles, and the mix of overall requests. Agency interviews will be 20 minutes long and consist of ten minutes for the applicant agency to present their request in a format of their choice, and another ten minutes for questions and answers with the CAC. Applicants are encouraged to keep their presentations succinct in order to make the best use of their time. Any materials distributed during the interview will be collected afterward and will not be considered part of the official application. The CAC will deliberate using the Citizen Advisory Committee Application Review Sheet on page 16 and compile a list of funding recommendations. These recommendations will be presented and discussed at a public meeting. The recommendations will then be presented to the Bremerton City Council at a Public Hearing. The final funding decision will be made by the City Council at the same Public Hearing. CDBG / HOME staff will submit the Final Action Plan to HUD no later than the end of November preceding the program year. Please refer to the 2008 CDBG/HOME Allocation Schedule on page iv for specific dates, times and locations. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE13 "i~4*.~:I~~~':g~~~:~,~~~}QJ~~J~t};~~~~!f\~;l~lfJ~lJ:~~;!i~~;':T;~~":~'~;~:;~ Name of Applicant B~::'>;'.J(p"'"'\;(l"g' "'2;tfi1;!'fr.'7f,jl""c!,;.F~',," :>,'.,.,." ',~.', a,'. ';', :;'::.:: ;:,+. :.:J>.:(;(:;'~ .~Q~Q1fi~1;in~ Score I. oar,. .:'an . 'i',.fa it, ",FO '1 e:;:.,;'-'.",.,';.d .)t/";;..:,;;..' d:'," ','. ,; .._-j,,-'_. _., -,..~ .,__..._ _ .,_ "'~'<>- .'.'~'" _" __' ._,_ '_. n.,_~ .. , " _ _. Board reflects a diverse representation of the community including minority and consumer participation, professionals from the community at large, persons with low 111comes, and consumer advocates 0-10 Points Board membership provides sufficient opportumtles for community participation (i.e. board vacanCIes, SIze and term length) 0-10 Points ~g~1ii~ajiQlial~\~fi~.;l~,~~.~~': -'t~~ 7~f.:~~~:~:~Jf:~';---~~:, :::~. ~~i(~'{.~: '~~-:.~' - 2~(~;;t :,":',::iJ ;~'~:~~~~~',~:~~?:,;{O~t$t~0Jn.i~ Organizational stmcture of the agency IS clearly defined 0-5 Points Program is adequately staffed / supervised 0-5 Points Chart reflects sufficient staffing and stmcture for the requested serVIces / proiect identified 111 the application 0-5 ~oints Q[g~tiizatio:ff3'l;"@atat>;~;; :';f;:;~;~'i;;:1t~~;~f)~:':;;'c:l,::i,~ ~\'".. ;~:'.' ;'.~'; ~.,;,;~:,:ti~::1~~ffO}'1.fJ)t~({ill~ Includes documentation that authorizes organization to conduct CDBG/HOME activities (i.e. 501(c)(3), public charter, business license, etc.), along with Statement of Experience, IRS 990, and Secretary of State CHO-l and Annual Report 0-5 Points Proposed Project aligns with the Mission Statement 0-5 Points ~Qrt~l1(.s~niffii~fQP~~~9'ff~iesii~l;7;o"il~~,.'~ K~~i",';"{Y;:.': :;X'~'~.}\~::~i ~:;ff.'f~'~;;tQ~$~Rolnts. Agency has adopted a policy of non-discrimination based on handicap, gender, race, etc. for all staff, volunteers, clients and participants, and does not deny program benefits for any persons needing reasonable accommodation 0-5 Points Total Rating: Comments: Reviewer: Title: Date: CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 14 - (t~;t} ';~lf ~ti\~\~<~~~~L::~: :~'~.\~:i~7:~~~},~ ~; i ,";.z. j -;, " ::~~.-~.. /' J~~'~-:_~-:-':"\:=: ;'?:":,~~~ ~~~~~ /:'~;:':1- ~,~~::~-'~'~ ~.~;. _~~~ :::..~j:~~.,(~?~,:F' ~:~~?:_y !':;~ "!?~~-l':~~ ~:[:: ',~;~'~~~~;i~ ;".~ fJ~":-~~~;? ~ ~~~ ~,</,~, " ~ANI~<A.'TIONAL,FINANOIAb'MANAG~MENlli'>"'('A. :".~"'\"^'" ::'&"~'~>: ':"ji/~;;"~~~~;, .;~~t,:~;~J:,~~~':-::r;~~~s~~.~,t,.~~~;~ ~~;' ~_ :. _~.;:i"i~\ .~~, ,,::-:; _~,:-L~"- - ~.i~4~'~~ ti.\}'i::. - ::':," ',,;:':: ~~-~.; '~: ~?",~ <:i:::~::'::- ~:"' <_<;;:__,~:~ :,!!~~::'~~r\,...t:'~>;::.:;"~_+o~~/: :~;~:~k.'~~~: :.~~~ i~:;2_(:.ir_~: _~ ~~i;P j:;~: :~Z:~~ Name of Applicant (Ef<Ylkl'$l():D~nf.QflfSj~nr~/~~~)?y:';;'~:ciJ~;~;~,:;:;",:'i',~ y {}'~"<' ,~,,',f~:~,~: ,/;, :;':;~' ,~' "t':"f: ~~; ,?;();jf5j~(jili:t~ Score IRS 990 is consistent with submitted audit and Secretary of State Annual Report 0-5 Points Secretary of State CHO-l Form (for non-profits) is consistent with submitted audit and Secretary of State Annual Report 0-10 Points Secretary of State Non-Profit Corporate Annual Report is consistent with submitted audit and agency's own annual report 0-5 Points Organizations other than Non-Profits 0-15 Points Records and program documents support investment in activities to Benefit low-income individuals 0-5 Points Organization clearly demonstrates reinvestment in community 0-5 Points - ~ ~- .., Demonstrates compliance with Generally Acceptable Accounting Principles 0-5 Points For All Organizations 0-35 Points Audit of Financial Statements Agency has independent review or audit by a CPA (as required by HUD) for the last fiscal year Independent Review 0-5 Points OR Audit 0-10 Points Audit or financial statement demonstrates adequate financial management (includes Management report) Independent Review 0-5 Points OR Audit 0-10 Points Annual Report Agency's Annual Report is completed for the last fiscal year 0-15 Points Total Rating: Comments: Reviewer: Title: Date: CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 15 ~t~~~~,I_;::~~:~~'f~\k:~ "~~';~:~;,.~)'~~~~~~~1, : .;:;:; '_~~_""':i~ '.~'.>' '~":':'_ _-~,~~ - '~:;- '_~:'::'"~_"_ ~'. ::~,?_~ ~~ ~::. ,: :.-J;. T~ 5i~~-:~~fi; -::~::~~ ~:~~,;:~~~~~~~ " ,1$c)~YABO~FlD .A~,R,[JQA::r:IG)N "RU~~I ~W\$ " \:f:1~-~);:Sf}j:~:~~ :~_... :::~'i>~:~ .~~: l;.~;:.,.i,,'.: .':,:: !i~.>}\>-L~.: <7.d;_.k~':_~~_#:'.-_:~' ~:i :-,,<lJ~'--~:'-<;~:i:::.i,_'~:~\",:,:; t:::'L.; ~}~:'~": -: :~~~" >~- .~~___ _:.., . 1. Review of Organizational Capacity Report: Are there remaining questions from the review sheet? 2. Review of Organizational Financial Management: Are there remaining questions from the review sheet? 3. Review of Application: A. Narrative Questions I. Does the proposed project fit within the organization's mission and history? II. Does the project description: 1. Address a national objective and community need? 2. Show that the project will address a significant portion of the identified unmet need with the requested funds? 3. Show that the requesting agency will partner with other community agencies? 4. Address the needs of low and very low income people? iii. Does the project's outreach plan and history demonstrate opportunities for persons with disabilities, limited English speaking, and minority clients to gain access-V;:> the project? IV. What will be the positive changes projected for this project and can they be documented, evaluated and monitored? B. Are project budget and resources adequate and reasonable for the expected outcome(s)? C. Are the program goals and outcomes clear and specific? D. Does the project fit within the agency's Mission Statement? E. Has the organization successfully managed CDBG / HOME funds effectively in past grants? F. Does the Annual Report reflect a well run organization with the capacity to manage the proposed project? G. If funding request is to support the salary of a position does the job description reflect the requested need within the project? H. Does the salary summary reflect an adequate and balanced salary structure? I. Does the annual report support the activities described in the application and does the report reflect a commitment to the goals of the CDBG program? J. Does the project's history demonstrate a commitment and well thought out plan and need? K. For Capital Projects, does the Operating / Management Plan demonstrate the ability of the organization to carry out and maintain the proposed project? CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 16 L. For Capital Projects, does the operating budget / proforma provide for a realistic ongoing financial support of the proposed project? M. For Capital Projects requiring a relocation plan, does the plan meet the required criteria and is it fully presented? 4. Overall Rating: High Priority; would like to see funded Needed Project; should be funded if funding is available Not a priority; should not be funded CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE17 , i~,i'~'i, . '. -'., ,,,< _ < ~. s.~~~-1-:~.;~~.~)T ,?~~,:~,'~'-~:. ~i'~(' ;,'~~.'~ ~~/~~-.z'~::, .- :;~":~ ~ :'~:~:::.: ~\ ~,.~~r~:~>,:: '. :,'-: ~;~~:,:.' '- ;-' .:~-".-~> ~,~~ ~- :.~ ;'~': -'~~'t;~~~~~:!~?\.: r~~~~~." ~ \~'~~.~~ ~-:~~'i~ ::.'~ '.~:'!~i-::;~~"i~ ,,,,;'''', ";"", 1,:",~008,(H)BG~NA"TIc)NA<L~c)8JE,@ml"!~S; ,f,~' :,," ;;'" ""'#, '. c'" <" ,.li:;j}!;;;;, r;, f;r~;;}~,:;;,,;,;: ",' {,1l:~~;l') :",_:'~>r,,~o,,\: ~:,>-'>,: ~:-~':;' ..~ ~:'!;' ',;: "";,--,,,:,}~},: ;:~~<::: ~'/::~ "'~:;?2~;,;~,5.;' ", ~~;-;,;;; '.) ;:,~~:i , ,\".' M' d'",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, N IBI(jI~YREQUJIRE,M~NWS, ,"" " ", ,', . ,..'" ~;:~:ib;;;t:~"\;~ ,,:;:~~i.f5~'~;J.~~fiL~J~, ::::~(;~::~~~~;~;:,~~ ~-~~:t~~>1f ~.;~~ ,=ft~'~:~ ~t~~ .;:.~; :;.^ :::'i~. - :,,: ~~ --~' . .~ :'-.~. Z ~ ~;.-~:_~~ ::'~:.~:' :.~':" '. '-2 :,:.{<' ,~:.~- ::,;"'\::'~~;J~<.~r:; _~ :;'~~;:~~3,;~.-:, .~~ ,J:.~:~:~}~t.~. :~~:~:~~ .~;~~~.:::t~.~~. 5.~ /- :~'.~~:~_i:~' ,.'] As stated in Part I, each CDBG activity must meet a national objective and must be eligible in order to be funded. The following information is provided to assist you in defining the eligibility and national objective that your activity meets and the type of information you need to provide to the City. Specific regulations that govern the CDBG program are available in our office. HOME funded projects need not meet a national objective. What are the National Objectives? (Benefit Criteria) An eligible CDBG activity must either (1) principally benefit low and very low income households, (2) reduce or prevent slum and blight, or (3) meet an urgent need. The vast majority of the City's CDBG activities are designed to benefit low and very low income persons and households. The following provides some detail on the way(s) in which CDBG projects can meet a national objective. More information on the three CDBG National Objectives can be found at 24 CFR Part 570.208. I. Principally benefit low and very low income A. Area Benefit B. Limited Clientele (1) At least 51% of beneficiaries are low or very low income persons/households (a) Presumed Benefit . "u" (b) Agency Requires Client Information (c) Income Eligibility Requirement (Direct Benefit) (d) Nature/location (2) Removal of Architectural Barriers (3) Assistance to Owners of Micro enterprises (4) Employment Support Services C. Housing Activities (Residential) D. Job Creation or Retention - Economic Development II. Reduce or Eliminate Slum or Blight A. Area Basis B. Spot Basis III. Meet an Urgent Community Need Potential applicants must be able to demonstrate that their proposed CDBG activity addresses one of these national objectives in one of several ways described below. I. Benefit Low and Very Low Income Persons To meet this national objective, an applicant must document that the proposed project will benefit predominantly low and very low income persons or households. A low income person/household is one whose annual income does not exceed 80% of the area median income for the City of Bremerton. The following shows income limits by household size for the City of Bremerton. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 18 INCOME LIMITS NUMBER IN EXTREMELY LOW VERY LOW INCOME LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLD INCOME (BELOW (31% - 50% MFI*) (51% - 80% MFI*) 30% MFI*) 1 $13,800 $23,000 $36,800 2 $15,750 $26,300 $42,050 3 $17,750 $29,550 $47,300 4 $19,700 $32,850 $52,550 5 $21,300 $35,550 $56,750 " 6 $22,850 $38,100 $60,950 7 $24,450 $40,750 $65,150 8 $26,000 $43,350 $69,350 *MFI = Median Family Income is determined periodically by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on the basis of state and local earnings data and is published for cities and counties. These figures represent percentages of MFI for Bremerton - Silverdale Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) published by HUD March 20,2007. The Median Family Income for Bremerton - Silverdale MSA is $65,700 for a four-person household. - -"---.=t. There are several different ways that COBG activities can benefit low, very low, and extremely low income persons: A. Area Benefit This is defined as an activity, the benefits of which are available to all residents in a particular area, where at least 51% of the residents are low, very low and extremely low income persons. In addition, the area must be orimarilv residential. Examples of area benefit activities include parks (that serve the immediate area), water and sewer projects, sidewalks and streets, and other public improvements that are available to all residents in a particular area. Applicants must: 0" Attach a map with the boundaries of the project's service area delineated (the surrounding geographic area in which all or most of the people benefiting from the project reside): [if Explain why that particular geographic area is the service area for the project; [if Indicate on the map residential and commercial areas within the service area boundary; and [if Provide documentation that 51 % or more of the residents within the service area are low very low and extremely low income persons/households. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 19 If you would like assistance in determining if your project is in a low income area, please contact us at 473-5211 or 473-5375. B. Limited Clientele 1. An activity which benefits a limited clientele, at least 51 % of whom are low or very low income persons/households. There are four types of activities in this category: a. Presumed Benefit An activity may benefit one of the following groups who are presumed by HUD to be principally low and very low income: abused children, battered spouses, elderly persons, handicapped persons, homeless persons, illiterate persons, and migrant farm workers. Applicants must: 0' Demonstrate that the facility or service is designed for and used predominantly by one of the groups identified above. b. A~ency Requires Client Information Which Shows 51 % or More are Low, Very Low and Extremely Low Income For example, community health clinic and most other agencies keep information on client income and family size. The information will be able to document whether or not 51 % or more of the clientele are persons whose family income does not exceed low, very low and extremely low income limits for Kitsap County. Note: Income qualification criteria from other programs (such as state poverty guidelines) may be substituted provided those criteria are at least as restricti\{EU~.~ the HUD income limits. Applicants must: 0' Provide documentation of the total number of clients/households served in 2006 (if this is an existing service); 0' State what percent of the clients/households served in 2006 were low or very low income (or met criteria that are stricter); 0' Provide a copy of the income qualification criteria that were used to screen clients and to determine the percent that were low and very low income; 0' Provide a copy of the client intake form highlighting the questions regarding family size and income levels; and 0' Agree to maintain documentation of the client's incomes for the CDBG contract period. c. Income Eliqibility Requirements (Direct Benefit) This means that the agency uses income screening to limit the benefits of the CDBG funded activity to only those persons who are low and very low income. For example, a housing counseling program would screen potential clients and use the CDBG funds to pay for the counseling only of those who are income eligible. Applicants must: 0' Screen clients by family size and income; 0' Provide a copy of the client intake form highlighting the questions regarding family size and income levels; and CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 20 IiI Describe how the program/project would limit the benefits of the CDBG funded activity exclusively to low and very low income persons/households. d. Nature/location of Activity Allows Conclusion of Primarily low and Very low Income Benefit This means that the activity is of such a nature and in such a location that it may be concluded that the clientele will be primarily low and very low income; for example, a food bank near an assisted housing project. Applicants must: IiI Explain how the nature, and if applicable, the location of the proposed project, establishes that it is used primarily for low and very low income persons. 2. Removal of Architectural Barriers A project which removes material or architectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderly or handicapped persons to publicly owned and privately owned non-residential buildings, facilities and improvements, and the common areas of residential structures containing more than one dwelling unit is considered a limited clientele activity. Note: This refers to the removal of existing barriers. It does not apply to new construction. 3. Assistance to Owners of Micro enterprises When assistance is to be provided to a micro enterprise (a commercial enterprise that has five or fewer employees, one or more of whom owns the enterprise) the owner must qualify as low or moderate income. Note: for micro enterprise projects under the limited clientele national objective justification, the low and moderate income threshold applies only to the owner; there are no income requirements for the workers the owner employs. 4. Employment Support Services If CDBG assistance is only provided for training or supportive services (peer support programs, counseling, child care, transportation, and other similar services) to assist business(es), the percentage of low and moderate income persons assisted may be less than 51 % if the proportion of the total cost borne by CDBG funds is no greater than the proportion of the total number of persons assisted who are low or moderate income. For example: A new business moves into town and begins an on-site day care program for workers. The total cost of the day care is $10,000. There are 40 children, 3 of which meet qualifications as low and moderate income. The maximum amount chargeable to the CDBG program is $750.00. ($10,000/40 =$250 X 3 = $750). Applicants must: IiI Maintain data documenting the total cost of the service, Screen clients by family size and income; and provide a copy of the client intake form highlighting the questions regarding family size and income levels. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 21 C. Housinq Rehabilitation Activities (Residential) These are activities providing or improving permanent residential structures which are or will be occupied by low and very low income households. It does not include group homes or shelters for the homeless, which are considered limited clientele activities. Applicants must: 0' Screen households for family size and income eligibility. If a residential structure contains two dwelling units, at least one must be occupied by low or moderate income households. If it contains more than 2 units, at least 51 % must be occupied by low and moderate income households. D. Job Creation or Retention Activities These are economic development activities which are designed to create or retain permanent jobs, where at least 51 % of the jobs, computed on a full-time equivalent basis, can be documented to employ low and very low income persons for the geographic area where it is located. There are very specific elements of this national objective. Please contact the Community Development staff to discuss your project prior to submitting an application. II. Reduce or Eliminate Slum and Blight An activity may meet the national objective of reducing or eliminatip.g slum and blight, instead of benefiting low and very low income people. There are two different ways that CDBG activities can meet this second national objective. A. Area Basis A project must be located in an area defined as a slum or blighted area under state or local law; the conditions which qualified the area as slum or blight must be on record; and the project must specifically address one or more of these conditions. B. Spot Basis A CDBG project to eliminate slum and blight on a spot basis (for example, outside of a locally designated slum or blighted area) must be limited to activities necessary to eliminate specific conditions posing a threat to the public health or safety. The health or safety hazard must be identified, and the scope of the project must be limited to correcting the hazard. III. Meet an Urgent Community Need Use of this category is extremely rare. It is designed only for activities that alleviate emergency conditions. Urgent need activities must meet the following criteria: · The existing conditions must pose a serious and immediate threat to the health and/or welfare of the community; CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 22 o The existing conditions are of recent origin or recently became urgent (generally, within the past 18 months); o The recipient is unable to finance the activity on its own; and Q Other sources of funding are not available. What are Eligible Activities? To be considered for funding, a CDBG proposal must also be an eligible activity under the federal CDBG regulations. A variety of activities serving low and very low income people are eligible activities as well as any special requirements or limitations that apply to use of CDBG funds. The applicant should recognize that the City may have local priorities within each of these categories of federally eligible activities that reflect local needs. Local priority policies are described in Part II of this document. .:. Acquisition of real property in whole or in part by public agencies or private non-profit organizations which is: · blighted, deteriorated, deteriorating, undeveloped, or inappropriately developed from the standpoint of sound community development and growth; · appropriate for rehabilitation or conservation activities; and, · appropriate for the preservation or restoration of historic sites, the beautification of urban land, the conservation of open spaces, natural resources and scenic areas; the provision of recreational opportunities, or the guidance of urban development; -.. '" .:. Acquisition, construction, reconstruction or installation (including design features and improvements that promote energy efficiency of these) of public works facilities (except of buildings for the general conduct of government), and site or other improvements; .:. Code enforcement in deteriorated or deteriorating areas where such enforcement together with public and private improvements or services are expected to arrest the decline of the area; .:. Clearance, demolition, removal, and rehabilitation (including rehabilitation which promotes energy efficiency) of buildings and improvements, such as interim assistance, and financing of public or private acquisition for rehabilitation, and rehabilitation of privately owned properties, including the renovation of closed school buildings; .:. Special projects directed to the removal of material and architectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility of elderly and handicapped persons; .:. Relocation payments and assistance to individuals, families or businesses displaced permanently or temporarily by a CDBG funded project consistent with the Federal Uniform Relocation Act; .:. Public/human services, including but not limited to those concerned with employment, crime prevention, child care, health, drug abuse, education, energy CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 23 conservatior,l, welfare or recreation needs, if such services have not been provided by the unit of general local government (through funds raised by such unit, or received by such unit from the State) during any part of the twelve-month period immediately preceding the date of submission of the CDBG Action Plan; .:. Planning activities necessary to: develop a comprehensive community development plan; develop policy-planning management capacity to rationally and effectively determine needs, set long and short term objectives, devise programs and activities to meet these objectives, and carry out management, coordination, and monitoring of activities necessary for effective planning implementation; .:. Provide assistance including loans and grants for activities carried out by public and private non-profit organizations including: acquisition of real property; acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation and installation of certain public facilities, site improvements and utilities; and commercial or industrial buildings or structures and other commercial or industrial real property improvements; and planning; .:. Assistance to Community Based Development Organizations (CBDO) to carry out neighborhood revitalization, community economic development, or energy conservation. A CBDO is an organization with specific characteristics such as: it is organized under State or local law to engage in community development activities; has as its primary purpose the improvement of the physical, economic or social environment of the area; may be either non profit or for profit provided any monetary profit to its shareholders must be only incidental to its operation; it must maintain at least 51% of its governing body's membership for low and moderate income residents of its geographical area of operation, owners or senior officers of private establishments, or representatives of low and moderate income neighborhood organizations located in the area of operation. The Development staff is available to review other requirements with entities interested in becoming CBDOs. .:. Provide assistance to private, for-profit entities, when the assistance is appropriate to carry out an economic development project (that shall minimize to the extent practical, displacement of existing businesses and jobs in neighborhoods) that: . create or retain jobs for low and very low income people; prevents or eliminates slums and blight; meets urgent needs; . creates or retains businesses owned by community residents; assists businesses that provide goods or services needed by, and affordable to, low and very low income residents; . provide technical assistance to promote any of the activities described above; .:. Provide technical assistance to public or non-profit entities to increase the capacity of that entity to carry out eligible neighborhood revitalization or economic development activities; CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 24 .:. Housing services such as housing counseling, energy auditing, preparation of work specifications, loan processing, inspections, tenant selection, management of tenant based rental assistance and other services related to assisting owners, tenants, contractors, and other entities participating or seeking to participate under CDBG or under Title II of the Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act; .:. Provide assistance to public and private organizations, agencies and other non-profit and for profit entities to enable such entities to facilitate economic development by: providing credit such as through direct loans and loan guarantees, establishing revolving loan funds, and facilitating peer lending programs for the establishment, stabilization and expansion of micro enterprises; providing technical assistance, advice and business support services (including assistance, advice, and support relating to developing business plans, securing funding, conducting marketing, and otherwise engaging in micro-enterprise activities) to owners of micro-enterprises and persons developing micro- enterprises; and · providing general support, such as peer support programs, counseling, child care, transportation, and other similar services to owners of micro-enterprises and persons developing micro-enterprises; .:. Provide direct assistance to facilitate and expand homeownership among persons of low and very low income by using such assistance to: · subsidize interest rates and mortgage principal amounts for low and very low income homebuyers; . · finance the acquisition by low and very low income homebuyers of housing that is occupied by the homebuyers; · acquire guarantees for mortgage financing obtained by low and very low income homebuyers from private lenders, except that funds may not be used to directly guarantee such mortgage financing and grantees may not directly provide such guarantees; provide up to 50% of any down payment required from low and very low income homebuyers; or · pay reasonable closing costs normally associated with the purchase of a home incurred by a low or very low income homebuyer. .:. Lead based paint hazard evaluation and reduction, as defined in Section 104 of the Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992. What are Ineligible Activities? (9 New Residential Housing Construction - CDBG funds generally cannot be used to construct new residential housing units, although activities in support of new housing construction may be eligible. (exception: CBDOs may use CDBG funds for new housing construction) Please note that group homes and shelters are not considered residential housing and are eligible for CDBG for new construction. o Regular Government Operations - CDBG funds cannot be used to fund the ongoing responsibilities of general local government. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 25 (9 Government Buildings - Government buildings such as city halls, police stations, jails and other buildings predominantly for the general conduct of government are not generally eligible for CDBG assistance. A major exception is rehabilitation to remove architectural barriers, which is eligible, even in government buildings. (9 Income payments - CDBG funds cannot be used for income payments such as payments for income maintenance or housing allowances. (9 Political Activities - CDBG funds cannot be used to finance the use of facilities or equipment for political purposes or to engage in other partisan political activities. (9 Purchase of vehicles and equipment. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 26 l, 'fu',.2:, ~ ~,,'i~~f;~l~.t ~~F":'/!r:~~~:{j,:~~~~>~-..,: ';~:; :~~~_~;.~;,~ ,~~~~~~ :~;~:_;~ :~__: ~- "'~~,::,:~. ;:-.\ ~ :' _;~;.~i: ~~~~ ~ ~~:::":~~T:";:' ~.-~,~~::,~(~~. ~,r,~:~'~-' ~~~:~~ _ :'=/:',:~:_IT;'---c \,c "'" \;Aamd~~,.\ ,2(j)c)I,,:CIi)m~J~()M E~P,f!IiIQA:rIQN $;\ ;'::' _~~_ ~?::;.:i-.;( ";.':~~~~:~;~:_8;,::-- -df.",~ "C;r~;j:~ ~-" ';';'y;;'~:~5;.-::\ ~;:- _ :~~ J?~: '-~':';:'::1"._~:C~:~~,:'":~:~::' :;2.~' ~:" '\' ;-t~+~ ; 'L"'; _:<f~:,r~:.;'~ ~~~::- ~< _';;~ "~.:..:Y . -'~_:::f::,.l_t~--_i:-~.:~,s:Et; ~ INTRODUCTION: Applications have been designed to gather necessary information about your organization and project to determine compliance with federal CDBG requirements and consistency with local policies for use of funds. Applications should be clear and concise. ApPLICATION DUE DATE: Applications must be received (postmark NOT acceptable) bv the due date at: City of Bremerton Department of Community Development 345 6th Street, Suite 600 Bremerton, W A 98337-1873 ApPLICATION SUBMISSION Four separate application packages are provided in this section. The application you use will be determined based on the type of project you are proposing. Activity Type Required Attachments CDBG Public Service A,B,C CDBG Planning A,B,C - -- .- CDBG Capital Projects A,B,E HOME Housing A,B,D Each application consists of 3 components: · 2008 CDBG Funding Application Form .. Response to Narrative Questions . Attachments . Provide one original application submission and one full copy consisting of the 3 components described above (include all attachments). . Provide five additional copies of the application submission consisting of: 1. 2008 CDBG or HOME Funding Application Form 2. Response to Narrative Questions 3. Project Feasibility Attachment (C, 0, or E, depending on the application category) Technical Assistance A mandatory Technical Assistance training will be provided by staff. See the 2008 CDBG/HOME Allocation Schedule on page iv for specific dates, times and locations.. CDBG/HOME PLAN AND ApPLICATION PAGE 27 2008 Community Development Block Grant PUBLIC/HUMAN SERVICES APPLICA TION Use this application for projects or programs which involve public services delivered to low-income Bremerton Residents. ~,~~j3.~:~ '. ,-.~_.~~~~~,-;,' i~,~~. - :.-;~? ~<~~:~~'~'~-~.2:,:-":~~~T~ .,::{.~.'; :.:~\o.. ~'';:: .r., ::' ~"- ~~ ~ ':>~:' r::',~\::~~~ty~~~ - ,~:'::5. ~,~i:u~"~;:::~7'_0~_" ;: .;".. ~ :::. ;'\;~ i,)rr~~~~l~ri~~~;.i~:~"- -: ~v';r~.,@;mEB.~ :;BUB:12.:1C."SEl,Rtltl C,e:....ABJ?,~I€A.ml ON,]:..>;,.. ,;,;,"":;:,:\~,,'l>";':'1",,J;f7', ;~~~1~:j'~A;~~',l~~;~~9;6~';~;fir.~!~6;t~:~":~~~~~~il~~iI;:.}~<"j;<';lr~:,:;~"~::;:~(1~;~:~';.F}.;!r.~:h; 2008 COBG Funding Application Form Response to Narrative Questions Attachments Attachment A (Organizational Capacity) A-1 An organizational chart showing all staff, board members and volunteer positions A-2 Organizational Data (i.e. 501 (c)(3), public charter, bylaws or business license #) A-3 Non-Discrimination Policies Attachment B (Organizational Financial Management) B-1 Most Recent Monthly financial statement including year-to-date information. B-2 Most recent Financial Audit or Financial Statement prepared by a CPA including findings. If your audit exceeds 50 pages, please include and executive summary and one full copy of the audit. B-3 A statement of experience including operating statements aria fender references and record of performance, qualifications, capacity to carry out the project described in this application and the agency's capacity to manage grants. B-4 IRS 990 (for non-profits) B-5 Secretary of State CHO-1 Form (for non-profits) also known as the Charitable Solicitations Renewal Form. B-6 Secretary of State Non-Profit Corporate Annual Report (for non-profits) Attachment C (Project Feasibility) **C-1 **C-2 **C-3a **C-3b **C-4 **C-5 C-6 C-7 **C-8 C-9 **C-10 **C-11 C-12 Total Budget, Form 1 2007 Agency Budget, Form 2 Sources of Financing Uses of Financing Agency Staff and Board Profile including names, addresses and associations. Program Goals and Outcome Data Commitment letters from other funding sources for this project Job Description (if requesting funding for personnel) National Objective and Eligibility Determination Mission Statement Agency CDBG/HOME History Form Salary Summary for entire Agency Annual Report. **Form provided within packet 2008 CDBG FUNDING APPLICATION FORM Check the appropriate box to Identify the type of funds for which you are applying: D Public Service D Planning D Capital Improvement CDBG Fund Request $ Project Title (If this project has been previously funded, please use the same title) Project Description Funds will be used to (25 words or less with specific numbers/goals): Project Location (physical address) Geographic Service Area Census Tract(s) Number of Unduplicated People Directly Benefiting from this Project Applicant Name Mailing Address Agency Director Name e-mail address Telephone # Staff Contact Name and Title e-mail address Telephone and Fax # Federal Tax I.D. # Type of Organization: Public Agency Private Nonprofit Other (Specify) Are you a Certified Housing Development Organization (CHDO) or Certified Community Based Development Organization (CBDO)? 0 Yes 0 No If not, are you planning on becoming a Certified CHDO or CBDO? 0 Yes 0 No Authorized Signature Date ~t~~t~~~::~~~~?~~~i~,~i~,~~~~~~1A'M~~q~~~~~r~~~1fI~?~~ig~~t~~}~~J;!);~~~~S~i Following each question are instructions to guide the type of information requested. Please type your responses and begin each page with the corresponding question number. The entire section must be limited to four (4) single sided pages of Times New Roman 12 point type. Additional pages will not be considered. 1. Provide a brief history of the agency I organization. When, how and by whom was the organization formed? How has it evolved and changed over the years? Give a brief description of your current programs and tell how they inter-relate. 2. Describe the project I program for which you are seeking funds. Include the following information: a. Proiect Specifics: Give a description of the proposed project including services that will be provided. Does the project address health and safety issues? .!1. Community Need: Is the project you are proposing identified / prioritized in a community or agency plan? If so, explain how and identify the plan. Estimate the unmet need for this service in the community being served. How much of the unmet need will the program address? c. Partners: Will you develop partnership agreements with other _co.r:n,!TIunity agencies to accomplish this project? What will be the nature of these partnerships? d. Tarqet Population: Who will be served? Describe the client population by geography. If the project serves Kitsap County as a whole, provide the percentage of clients living in Bremerton that will be served. g,. Client Income: How does this project target low and very low income populations? t Funds: How will the requested funds be used? Be specific. Explain how you determined costs and the status of other funding. 3. Describe the outreach plan to be used to ensure that eligible persons have access to your project I program. Include a discussion about outreach and access to persons with disabilities, limited English speaking, and minority clients. What is your organization's history in serving these populations? 4. What will change in the lives of individuals, families, and the community as a result of this funding? How do you know that your program / project will be effective? Site evidence of other successful models, or your own track record as examples of successful results. How will the change be documented, monitored and evaluated? 5. Describe your organization's incorporation of family policy principles as described on pages 11-12 of this packet. S ff & 8 d T t I Senior & Low ta " oar Racial Categories ..2 ~ M" 0 ~t. Income Total Profile C-4 jjj "u mon les Totals Z(f) c 0,).... cO,) 0,) 0,) 0 O LU c CO..c 0,) co :!: - C .::: c(/)O,) v -- co ~ o-v~..c..c COO/l ~ co ' -<( Cii .... O,)..c>. "-[( u (/) c (/)> S u z U 0,) 0 , -u- r- .- C C co -- co c co > '- C C .- ~ . . E _ :> co ~ c <C 0 .... - c - - .... .... ~ >. U co C :> U 'u 0 CL ~ co co <( co (/) co <( O/l O/l ~ co co __ c ~ ~ - .- 0,) >. "'" >. 0,) 0 OJ = OJ c:J OJ ~ ,g c .g C OJ OJ :iij -: .g c OJ c ~.g OJ .g c J:1 ~ .... Cii :~ ffi ~ .1:: :: .1:: (f) a5 -1 E ~ CL 1:: 5 ~ ~ LU - U OJ co OJ .~.::: .::: ~ ~ O,).~.::: co U O,).'!: O,).~ (/) U. 0,)'(3 c CL co 0 co 0 0 N 0 0 co -@ ::l (/) 0,) '-' f- ..c co E '(jj E v ~ ~ co CL E v ~ '(jj ~ E..c E v ~ ~ E :5 co :5 .~ '0 .S: '0 ,S: !!2 :.e !!2 U '0 co.... U g('3 S CD<( <( <(Ez ZI.... <(Ez <( co<(S <(E<(O/lco<( 00: WI I-~ I-~ <(() <(E 1-:::>.E.~5 Directors Administrators Professionals Technicians Protective Service Worker Para Professionals Office-Clerical Skilled Craft Service Maintenance Volunteers , , ,I Other Affirmative Action: What is your organization doing to increase or maintain appropriate representation of race, gender, age, income that supports your organization's unbiased treatment of volunteers, (including Board members) or staff. (IE Hiring practices, advertising, promotion, & job applicants)? 'C"",>.. . 'f, C!U.!II\GeS:;0f.;;E!.mamClnet..A:U ,p,roJect .f;'unCllng.$OUr'cesi..,,:. """';"';"''"'<'' '.:".'i; ;~~~(\,:,t_; :~-'_~ (::~~_~..,:;~~:~:~~.~.;,~t~:,J,~}- ~:ff:.~~\/ r~:i:":;~~~.~-'.,~~::~!!>:~._:~1.'~~+:;>~' ):,_.1.-:~;~':~..~,:,?L=-~~: ,>~..\~"~-=.:_ :~:_: :_, ~~'"--~~ ~_.::L ,~'.,~'-?~ ~~:::_~}_ '- _~:i, . > 'i .~~~, .';':;;:. ~/i"~, ~ :,_'i~:~~.:L; ~:'~-.:,,;; ~_::' ~'; : .:~ ":;:.~ \k:}->i:~ ~~::~_ ..:;:~'~j A enc Name Pro'ect Name Source (Name) Committed Conditional Tentative Federal: CDBG $ $ $ (Application amount) $ $ $ State: $ $ $ $ $ $ Local: $ $ $ $ $ ~--~ $ Applicant: $ $ $ $ $ $ Private: $ $ $ $ $ $ In-kind: $ $ $ $ $ $ Subtotals: $ $ $ "Ai;~;J{lRi"J~~~~~f;i\l~ti~t~[~~V~~~!r~~~~i~~~fi~~tij~~~'~~f(~~fI:;~~c A ene Name Pro'eet Name Project Cost Amount CDBG/HOME (County) CDBG/HOME (City) Other Source of Funds PERSONNEL Managers Staff SUBTOTAL SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT Office Supplies Equipment SUBTOTAL *ADMINISTRATION Advertising Audit Insurance/Bonds Postage/Printing Rent/Utilities Communication Training/Travel Transportation SUBTOTAL ACQUISITION COSTS Acquisition SUBTOTAL DEVELOPMENT SOFT COSTS Appraisal Design and A & E Processing/Settlement and Financing Marketing Operating Reserve SUBTOTAL DEVELOPMENT HARD COSTS Clearance/Demolition Construction Rehabilitation Improvements SUBTOTAL OTHER COSTS Relocation Operating/Maintenance expenses SUBTOTAL ,f~~~~~r~~i~![~"",:~i~i~~~'~t~~;:~;i~~~:q~!1~f,i1t~A:~~~~~1~~r~: Agency Name Project Name Indicate the national objective your project meets. Attach the documentation specified for the national objective (refer to PART'" of this manual). o Principally benefit low and very low income o Area Benefit o Limited Clientele o At least 51 % of beneficiaries are low or very low income persons/households (identify a, b, c, or d below; documentation will be determined by the letter selected) (a)D Presumed Benefit (b)D Agency Requires Client Information (c)D Income Eligibility Requirement (Direct Benefit) (d)D Nature/location o Removal of Architectural Barriers o Assistance to Owners of Micro enterprises o Employment Support Services o Housing Activities (Residential) o Job Creation or Retention - Economic Development o Reduce or eliminate Slum or Blight . Identify how you think your project is eligible according to CDBG requirements. Part 11/ provides additional information concerning eligibility requirements. o Acquisition of real property o Acquisition, construction reconstruction or installation of public works facilities o Code enforcement o Clearance, demolition, removal, and rehabilitation of buildings and improvements o Removal of material and architectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility o Public/human service o Planning activities o Assistance to Community Based Development Organizations (CBDO) o Economic development project o Housing services o Assistance to facilitate economic development o Assistance to expand homeownership o Lead based paint hazard evaluation and reduction **Please attach documentation showing how your agency complies with National Objective requirements. Please see Part'" of this manual or contact CDBG staff for further information. Resources Staff Violence Prevention Curriculum Partnerships: University, Counseling Center, Sheriff, Schools Participants PROCESS Activities Delivery of violence prevention curriculum in the schools (pre-K through 4th Grade) Intensive Violence prevention groups to high risk youth DARE Family empowerment Attachment C-5 Outcome Evaluation Outputs 4-6 hours of violence prevention education for 1890 students 480 students receive intensive prevention training in 10 week groups of 6-10 students each 185 at-risk families receive outreach assistance. Outcomes Improvement in healthy peer social communication reduction of violent behaviors in schools improved school related behaviors increase in family support consumer satisfaction OUTCOME Goals Violence prevention Resources ~ PROCESS Activities +- Attachment C-5 Outcome Evaluation Outputs . Outcomes OUTCOME Goals ."""..;,<C;'," "r,:-'+' . "",'Age ene\l;{@Da~lt1lG>M,E,Hlst0r'Yc,f,'ol'1m ,'",'.:" ' ....."""',,r..>~,'..,,',,...;.,'''::.,''. ~~~t:)~;::t.'~~:~:~>::", :;:[":::' ~'.:~': ~_:i~;:~:~ :' Ji2'g~ :i,.7!:"{ :,~'<{_~:~il~'. -'~. ~h,,~~:J,t.~,: ".~<~t~_~. c:;. ~-~~~~; : .7~_":- ':.' :.: _~, ~_~. -. :.,~: _.:, :'~':~ :::(~-S~, }:~ ;',,::_L:-~~i ~;~:'-;"~~<:~~?~2:~( f~~;;'_':_2~; ~~~:,~ j?~.~,~~; ,~.~-' ~~~-~';:> _<~::;1 Agency Name Project Name Provide a history of your agency's management of CDBG and/or HOME Projects since 2002. I~)l~ ~?I J~~~'{Y,;\ :' :i;' 1~'(> I J. r:.. ,;.. y{/:",,;, ,:,::1:' ;,:" ".,:.:';:5;"i, ..:';,,: ,:i :\2. :c: ,'e, ':".:. ;:c'; .';~',;; .:. j;;~i; '\7';;;"<) ,;/" ,i" ':':';~~;:~~F.-J~~'~"::::(I~'~~r. ,'-'"V;:''',:; .<:).;~,:,;/] :':"} ,f';,;"I ~'E.~'~n'a~d,I);, ,1'6:;).::"',-;",;:' ",>:,~; 'c.,? :C:''':; ,<;? :',,:~,'!." i{i f:~.;~~~/~!i!.~?";~L;I;"' . ",,,. .... '::",:'i:-\:,~:~;)::,,~\ '::,:,:;~":,,::,. c_.,; .7" ,:,~ CDBG D COUNTY D HOME D CITY D CDBG D COUNTY D "- HOME D CITY D CDBG D COUNTY D HOME D CITY D CDBG - . '- '" D COUNTY D HOME D CITY D CDBG D COUNTY D HOME D CITY D CDBG D COUNTY D HOME D CITY D CDBG D COUNTY D HOME D CITY D What is the agency's insurance program for general liability/officers and board/volunteers, etc.? Please attach a copy of your current policy. Does the agency have any threatened or pending litigation? No Yes (if yes, attach explanation) Does the agency have any audit or I RS problems? No Yes (if yes, attach explanation) Authorized Signature Date :f:J,;~:{~,'~;~F~:"~:f'T'.,,?):~r, \"i,;;-:';' ;~~ir"J.:;;;~J;lM"::;~'N'-:: #:;;;:,;, > ',::;i, ,~:.:;::;~:::yr'::'~:}2:{:QF;:50:' ,;~~;;'~ "';''"="'-':'C 'l"""'<~ ._"I..-'~""'&",-'-""<..,-. ;.__l;"~.,o".';'~"Y' ,...: ..,--;\-'~-)Jer\:.,I:- 'jl..M.\,;;iA. ~1 ":1 ",V-""!"." .c"",-"., . ~ .:Y,,'_'- '," ."- ,,-~I,~_ >;:\'" i-~',-"- c,-,> t~,;~;~,i~;r:>fi~~~~~j~:fiQ~"~~~;~~*F~:~;~:~i;9_:~~.~Yj'C~"~;f:~j:~~t'~":.':'.;(/l?"~,1i}~;:;~'i:,;.~~;~,: Project Name , ,:2,Op8,'p.,rgr~ctEi(j 8Ud ",' et ", ".,g Number of professional FTEs Number of clerical FTEs Number of all other FTEs !~~,i9rYJ6J~'r~.~~t~~~:':r;f;i{::J,D~:' Salary of Director Salaries of Professional Staff Salaries of Clerical Staff Other Salaries Description Description Description Description Totals Total Payroll Cost (including payroll taxes) Total Cost of Benefits Total Cost of Retirement Total Salary and Fringe Costs 2008 Community Development Block Grant PLANNING APPLICATION Use this application for projects or programs which involve the development or implementation of community plans. ~':~'~:-:~~~..~3.::~:;~?IZ'f~":': ~.~ ~ ,:>": ';:'~;t ~~ ~ ~ ",.; ~f"'<:: /~~/ ~:?,~~: ;;o~~f;j~. '~;/ - ',-':%->;;,};:-:!~ _~~{~~~~:~~::;-~: ";~ ,~;~ ... ~7;::::0~~-~ -:;~, :'..,~: :,,~~, ~~,.:~~- ~::',;-~~~ ,-;.~~,:;,,~~ -~:f~ :;.' '. . 'B C;'~RI1iAI\IN I N ~ JU~U?111 0' N'; ., 3'\'H.o:'>', .c," .~" ,,~;~,i4,;:,~,;:~f;~tj!~~m~"~i:~:9;b:r~'6l~t~1:'::h~~~1J~%~;~;~;'~2;1:~~/fj~;~~t~~L; 2008 COBG Funding Application Form Response to Narrative Questions Attachments Attachment A (Organizational Capacity) A-1 An organizational chart showing all staff, board members and volunteer positions A-2 Organizational Data (i.e. 501 (c)(3) , public charter...) A-3 Non-Discrimination Policies Attachment 8 (Organizational Financial Management) B-1 Most recent monthly financial statement B-2 Most recent Financial Audit or Financial Statement prepared by a CPA, including findings. B-3 A statement of experience including operating statements and iender references and record of performance, qualifications, and capacity to carry out the project described in this application B-4 IRS 990 (for non-profits) B-5 Secretary of State CHO-1 Form (for non-profits) B-6 Secretary of State Non-Profit Corporate Annual Report (for non-profits) Attachment C (Project Feasibility) C-1 Project History C-2 Commitment letters from other funding sources for this project **C-3a Sources of Financing **C-3b Uses of Financing **C-4 Agency CDBG/HOME History form C-5 Mission Statement **C-6 Salary Summary C-7 Annual Report **C-8 Agency Board and Staff Profile including names, addresses and associations **Form provided within packet 2008 COBG FUNDING APPLICATION FORM Check the appropriate box to Identify the type of funds for which you are applying: D Public Service D Planning D Capital Improvement CDBG Fund Request $ Project Title (If this project has been previously funded, please use the same title) Project Description Funds will be used to (25 words or less with specific numbers/goals): Project Location (physical address) Geographic Service Area Census Tract(s) Number of Unduplicated People Directly Benefiting from this Project Applicant Name Mailing Address Agency Director Name e-mail address Telephone # Staff Contact Name and Title e-mail address Telephone and Fax # Federal Tax I.D. # Type of Organization: Public Agency Private Nonprofit Other (Specify) Are you a Certified Housing Development Organization (CHDO) or Certified Community Based Development Organization (CBDO)? DYes D No If not, are you planning on becoming a Certified CHDO or CBDO? DYes D No Authorized Signature Date ,,~~.,;;\~~~~~l;";~Q;";~j~tW;!Qfi1T~~i~~~~~~X\ Please type your responses and begin each page with the corresponding question number. The entire section must be limited to four (4) single sided pages of Times New Roman, 12 point type. Additional pages will not be considered. Briefly describe your project: (3 to 4 sentences) 1. Describe the anticipated results of the planning activity. Explain if the plan will result in the development of specific community priorities. 2. Describe who will benefit from implementation of the planning effort and how they will benefit. 3. Describe if you are collaborating or coordinating with other agencies to develop the plan. Attach documentation if available. 4. Does the plan promote neighborhood and local improvements? Explain. Staff & Board >- Racial Categories :'.:: Total Senior & Low () Total Profile C-8 c: Minorities Income Totals .c: ... w Z(j) c (!) "- c (!) (!) (!) c 0 OW c Cll J:: (!) Cll ::: ::: c > Cll (fJ (!) "0 1-0: Cll ..:x: -"0 ..:x:J:: J:: ~~ ~ .~ I <t ro "- (!) J:: >- U (fJ o c c~S S E (!) 0 , -u- <(0 'C c c.!!l ---Cll 'C c c z:;: :::J >-u E :s: Cll Cll c - Cll c - Cll<(~ - Cll (!) >- Cll >- c .!:2 (!) 0 0...0 Cll<( Cll.!!!. ~ <( u Cll___c~ :2: - .- (!) c o (!) <( u .!:2 'C (!) .!:2 'C (!) 'u c LJ..::: :2: ::: '"'O.._c ~ 'C (!) := ~ 'C .g C ~ ~ "-ro CI) (!) ..J E =>w ~ c > Cll cj c 'c ~ "- "- -:::JcoQj' Q; Cll .::= Q; Cll .::= (!) .- - 0 - 0 01- u (!) .~ :.;::;:S:Cll Cll u (!) . (!) Cll (fJ- . J:: U 2 c 2 c o N o 0 2"O:::J~u J:: .!!lE (fJ E'5"CU CllCllo.. E'5"CU (fJ .!!l E: E'5.!!lcoE _ Cll J:: (fJ o .- o .- C/)';.f:j (fJ U o C 0 (!) c 0<( S - .- <to - c 00 CO<( <( <(Ez ZI,,- <(Ez <( CO<( <(E<(06<( Ocr: WI f-:2: f-:2: <(- f- :) ..s. 0.. 0 Directors Administrators Professionals Technicians Protective Service Worker Para Professionals Office-Clerical Skilled Craft , Service Maintenance i Volunteers Other Affirmative Action: What is your organization doing to increase or maintain appropriate representation of race, gender, age, income that supports your organization's unbiased treatment of volunteers, (including Board members) or staff. (IE Hiring practices, advertising, promotion, & job applicants)? ,,,,,,,,~:::::;iiiil\1~~l~~~f~~~~~lil~~~~~lt~~~r' A enc Name Project Name Source (Name) Committed Conditional Tentative Federal: CDBG $ $ $ (Application Amount) $ $ $ State: $ $ $ $ $ $ Local: $ $ $ $ $ $ Applicant: $ $ $ $ $ $ Private: $ $ $ $ $ $ In-kind: $ $ $ $ $ $ Subtotals: $ $ $ ;l0ti~:~;'~i~~~~~J~~~1fl~t~Jll~rl[~~~~~~i~~~~i~,~~y~~~j!f;J~~!~~~J; Project Cost Amount Pro"ect Name CDBG/HOME CDBG/HOME (County) (City) Other Source of Funds A enc Name PERSONNEL Managers Staff SUBTOTAL SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT Office Supplies Equipment SUBTOTAL *ADMINISTRATION Advertising Audit Insurance/Bonds Postage/Printing Rent/Utilities Communication TraininglTravel Transportation SUBTOTAL ACQUISITION COSTS Acquisition SUBTOTAL DEVELOPMENT SOFT COSTS Appraisal Design and A & E Processing/Settlement and Financing Marketing Operating Reserve SUBTOTAL DEVELOPMENT HARD COSTS Clearance/Demolition Construction Rehabilitation Improvements SUBTOTAL OTHER COSTS Relocation Operating/Maintenance expenses SUBTOTAL *If your agency has an administrative overhead rate pre-approved, please attach documentation. ;',.[,~~;.~?;~;1'~~1~:~1~:Il~~~r0;~~!~~9.~Bi!i~~~f:'~~~;,~~;/i.TC:t~fXt;~r:~~~~;~;~~~~~~::~;r.;:,,'it;:;,F:~~F;~~,'n~' v.,.. ," ...,.,'d",,'..,.., ~r:\'r:;)~,lUOI\'II~ "H" '''t . ". ".~."... "", ,<""'"". .,".. ,.,. .....'.,......,'... .... ~>,i:~:: ".... ~~RYL~B;~~~.~Ih:..::,!:\[~~:;'. ..,';~.,,~:.~~r[9Im~x~;{f:::t,:;!~;;}3*;&;{~Jj~':~:" Agency Name Project Name Provide a history of your agency's management of CDBG and/or HOME Projects since 2002 &l~~[;1 ~~~'1~!~J CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOM!;. CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME What is the agency's insurance program for general liability/officers and board/volunteers, etc.? 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 Does the agency have any threatened or pending litigation? No Yes (if yes, attach explanation) Does the agency have any audit or I RS problems? No Yes (if yes, attach explanation) Authorized Signature Date ::_,: r .-- ~ ~ ; ~ _ ':'::;'~:;.<~ " ';,.~.' --. . ;j~'- :3"., ;':i'o;"'1:' "': ~ ~-,- -,,--;, ::rM~~ ': ~'~~~<-',,- : -- - :.,~, .....-;;. :- ~, : -, '1-: ~.,"-~ ~ ( ",.,- ..~\-: ,.:<;,"'.}l'" ,~hf' tJ;- , :. , C,", . .' ""ATTAP_IlIIM'~NT ,,,... '6:,' '. ,.' ".' . ',U, -.' .''''.n >, .'~ <> ~~~;"+'~ :=-"... ':,..,.;: '11 ",'t- ..._~!fI-t~ ,I;;~.:t~~~ "~~:-... :' '_ ~t I ~ ~"~'M<;c' :...~"')'<.:/v r". ......\~t 'J( .:,~ ,'ry ~:.c ~;(,J;_ '~;~,$!criarV:$:um:rtia'It~'~P,lad'tji'flg';f~-fi>j~ets:":'if, ',,:>:,:~, ',> -i', '''l}: :::" :', ',', - -i~", ~ .~.::~:?~ ~ ~~.~~"';:,.~ f:'.11 '::..~;~ ,,_:~;-'1,7 "=~h ~ ~ _~~"y~_~: 'i'~"i"<~ "'~/N_; _.~~""_~,. '" '. "', ~\1;~~:-"'; ~""'; ~ :~: ,;~.:__: ~ .._-' -~1<.1 t~ Agency Name: Project Name Number of professional FTEs Number of clerical FTEs Number of all other FTEs 8a:lar'"",JnforrfHUiijif'." ' :'.;:':;;:,~, .:.":,;<' Salary of Director Salaries of Professional Staff Salaries of Clerical Staff Other Salaries Description Description Description Description '-," '-; Totals Total Payroll Cost (including payroll taxes) Total Cost of Benefits Total Cost of Retirement Total Salary and Fringe Costs 2008 Community Development Block Grant CAPITAL PROJECTS APPLICATION Use this application for projects which involve public facilities or the acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or construction of real property. ~~ffi~;r;:':,~iJJ!~~~1~f~l~~~q41~';"!~I~li~~~~~~f~~~ri:l~~~~Jr~I~,f{i~':;i~~~ 2008 CDSG Funding Application Form Response to Narrative Questions Attachments Attachment A (Organizational Capacity) A-1 An organizational chart showing all staff, board members and volunteer positions A-2 Organizational Data (Le. 501 (c)(3), bylaws, public charter or business license #) A-3 Non-Discrimination Policies Attachment B (Organizational Financial Management) B-1 Most recent monthly financial statement including year-to-date information B-2 Most recent Financial Audit or Financial Statement prepared by a CPA including findings. If your audit exceeds 50 pages, please include an executive summary and one copy of the full audit. B-3 A statement of experience including operating statements and J~lJder references and record of performance, staff qualifications, and capacity to carry out the project described in this application. B-4 IRS 990 (for non-profits) B-5 Secretary of State CHO-1 Form (for non-profits), also known as the Charitable Solicitations Renewal Form. B-6 Secretary of State Non-Profit Corporate Annual Report. Attachment E (Project Feasibility) Sources of Financing Use of Financing Commitment letters from other funding sources for this project Management Plan National Objective and Eligibility Determination Preliminary Environmental Review Checklist Purchase and Sale Agreement, if applicable Operating Pro Forma Plans and Specs for the Project Relocation Plan, if appropriate Neighborhood Notification Plan, if appropriate Mission Statement Agency CDBG/HOME History Form Salary Summary Annual Report (if your report exceeds 50 pages, please include five summaries and one copy of the full report) **E-15 Agency Board and Staff Profile with names, addresses and associations **Form provided within packet **E-1 a **E-1 b E-2 E-3 **E-4 **E-5 E-6 E-7 E-8 E-9 E-10 E-11 **E-12 **E-13 E-14 2008 COSG FUNDING APPLICATION FORM Check the appropriate box to Identify the type of funds for which you are applying: D Public Service D Planning D Capital Improvement CDBG Fund Request $ Project Title (If this project has been previously funded, please use the same title) Project Description Funds will be used to (25 words or less with specific numbers/goals): Project Location (physical address) Geographic Service Area Census Tract(s) Number of Unduplicated People Directly Benefiting from this Project Applicant Name Mailing Address Agency Director Name e-mail address Telephone # Staff Contact Name and Title e-mail address Telephone and Fax # Federal Tax I.D. # Type of Organization: Public Agency Private Nonprofit Other (Specify) Are you a Certified Housing Development Organization (CHDO) or Certified Community Based Development Organization (CBDO)? DYes D No If not, are you planning on becoming a Certified CHDO or CBDO? DYes D No Authorized Signature Date ~ii&1Ji~~t~~~d:, Following each question are instructions to guide the type of information requested. Please type your responses and begin each page with the corresponding question number. The entire section must be limited to four (4) single sided pages of Times New Roman 12 point type. Additional pages will not be considered. 1. Provide a brief history of the agency I organization. When, how and by whom was the organization formed? How has it evolved and changed over the years? Give a brief description of your current programs and tell how they inter-relate. 2. Describe the project I program for which you are seeking funds. Include the following information: a. Project Specifics: Give a description of the proposed project including services that wjJJ be provided. Does the project address health and safety issues? b. Community Need: Is the project you are proposing identified I prioritized in a community or agency plan? If so, explain how and identify the plan. Estimate the unmet need for this service in the community being served. How much of the unmet need will the program address? c. Partners: Will you develop partnership agreements with other community agencies to accomplish this project? What will be the nature of these partnerships? Q., Tarqet Population: Who will be served? Describe the client population by geography. If the project serves Kitsap County as a whole, provide the percentage of clients living in Bremerton that will be served. Q,. Client Income: How does this project target low and very low income populations? t Funds: How will the requested funds be used? Be specific. Explain how you determined costs and the status of other funding. 3. Describe the outreach plan to be used to ensure that eligible persons have access to your project I program. Include a discussion about outreach and access to persons with disabilities, limited English speaking, and minority cfients. What is your organization's history in serving these populations? 4. What will change in the lives of individuals, families, and the community as a result of this funding? How do you know that your program / project wjJJ be effective? Site evidence of other successful models, or your own track record as examples of successful results. How will the change be documented, monitored and evaluated? 5. Describe your organization's incorporation 'of family policy principles as described on pages 11-12 of this packet. 6. Describe your organization's construction management and property management experience. What project(s) has the organization constructed in the past and how large were they in physical size, complexity and cost compared to the proposed project? Has your organization received Federal funding for previous construction projects? Discuss the experience of the staff who will be assigned to construction management, record keeping and facility maintenance once completed. Give a brief project schedule and estimate when the CDBG funds will be used. Provide a brief maintenance plan, including how maintenance will be funded. >- Senior & Staff & Board .'!:: Total Low Racial Categories () Total Profile E-15 l:: Minorities Income ..c: - Totals w ,q c c Z(f) .~ '206E <a (1) (1) 0 o!:!:! ..... .c '13 0 N E ~ c (1) c (1) cs: ro(1)<( ro c :;::; 0 (1) i=rr: ro .c ..... co ."!:::: (1) .- > a:: 0 ~ G U "OD.. C ..... "0.- C 00 (1) <(0 ro .Ot:. ..... (1) .Ot:. .c :.c ~06 c.....ro , ::i: <a ..... c (1).c U 00 0"0 c~S: s: - ro U '';::; (1) 0 ,. mUm 0...0 c~ ""'c c Z'C ::i E "t: C C ro ";:: c >.U <a c :?: () ro =>w - ro ro<( ro<(06 - ro ~c<c ~ (1) >- <( U ro- 06 <( U ."!:::: 'c ~ (1) 0 Io..~g Of- .g C ~ (1) := 00 .g c ~ 'C J:1 ~ LL ."!:::: (f) -' (1) ~'c c ro- c ~'c CD .~ ro - 0 - ::J C 0 0<( ..... U (1) ro (1) ro._ ..s :?: <.:i (1) ro._ ro U (1) (1) 00 U C D.. .;g C <a 0 0 ro"O::J~ 00 .c ~ E '(ii E'Oill E'Oill '(ii ~E E~~ .c .coo '0 00 00 ro ro ro i5 o .- 'Ococ s: CD<( <( <(Ez ZIo... <(Ez <( CD<( <(<(CD WI f-~ f- ::i: ::i: f-:J-2-o Di recto rs Administrators Professionals Technicians Protective Service Worker Para Professionals Office-Clerical Skilled Craft I i Service Maintenance ~ Volunteers I Other Affirmative Action: What is your organization doing to increase or maintain appropriate representation of race, gender, age, income that supports your organization's unbiased treatment of volunteers, (including Board members) or staff. (IE Hiring practices, advertising, promotion, & job applicants)? ;~~~~l~~f~V~~~l;~~mt~t~~T~~~~~i~~l~~[i~l;~f~~~~~l~: Agency Name Project Name Source (Name) Committed Conditional Tentative Federal: $ $ $ $ $ $ State: $ $ $ $ $ $ Local: $ $ $ $ $ $ Applicant: $ $ $ $ $ $ Private: $ $ $ $ $ $ In-kind: $ $ $ $ $ $ Subtotals: $ $ $ Name Pro'ect Name Project Cost Amount CDBG/HOME (County) PERSONNEL Managers Staff SUBTOTAL SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT Office Supplies Equipment SUBTOTAL *ADMINISTRATION Advertising Audit Insurance/Bonds Postage/Printing Rent/Utilities Communication TraininglTravel Transportation SUBTOTAL ACQUISITION COSTS Acquisition SUBTOTAL DEVELOPMENT SOFT COSTS Appraisal Design and A & E Processing/Settlement and Financing Marketing Operating Reserve SUBTOTAL DEVELOPMENT HARD COSTS Clearance/Demolition Construction Rehabilitation Improvements SUBTOTAL OTHER COSTS Relocation Operating/Maintenance expenses SUBTOTAL CDBG/HOME (City) Other Source of Funds ;""""""""',.".;'" /,' "",-<,,/',,Natlonal..(}IJ)Jeellve::arael.;lnlgIDlhty',[}etermlnatlon.. ' ;~ ~.;~~i:!d:~ ~{j~_~t~~~zi;~, ~:~~:iCt~~i;.,:i!:t:?:~l~~A ,:.~~.;_; ~~":~~~-';~; '<." ~_'.~:- '::;,~.. ,: :>,\. - ". ,,"., . ,- '~", '/r;, ,,;': t :~~,_~;-:-',:' '.:;-~", is ~' :t. i~;~~~>:~'~ '~.~\;:'.c.~-;=' ~,'~{"_:_, '; : -ii'~ :-.:/<; / '_.-:i.~~ ~ :'::'~' ~(;; ~~ '~c Agency Name Project Name Indicate the national objective your project meets. Attach the documentation specified for the national obiective (refer to PART III of this manual). D Principally benefit low and very low income D Area Benefit D Limited Clientele D At least 51 % of beneficiaries are low or very low income persons/households (identify a, b, c, or d below; documentation will be determined by the letter selected) (a)D Presumed Benefit (b)D Agency Requires Client Information (c)D Income Eligibility Requirement (Direct Benefit) (d)D Nature/location D Removal of Architectural Barriers D Assistance to Owners of Microenterprises D Employment Support Services D Housing Activities (Residential) D Job Creation or Retention - Economic Development D Reduce or eliminate Slum or Blight · Identify how you think your project is eligible according to CDBG requirements. Part 11/ provides additional information concerning eligibility requirements. D D D D D Removal of material and architectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessibility D Public/human service D Planning activities D Assistance to Community Based Development Organizations (CBDO) D Economic development project D Housing services D Assistance to facilitate economic development D Assistance to expand homeownership D Lead based paint hazard evaluation and reduction Acquisition of real property Acquisition, construction reconstruction or installation of public works facilities Code enforcement Clearance, demolition, removal, and rehabilitation of buildings and improvements **Please attach documentation showing how your agency complies with National Objective requirements. Please see Part III of this manual or contact CDBG staff for further information. ,:tT~j1~~~irj~~~~~tli~lli~~~2J~f~~~~f~B;;~f~~~1i At the site under consideration for the project, please make an observation for each of the seven Compliance Factors listed below. Enter a "Y" for Yes or "N" for No in the space for the given condition. Fill in the blank with the appropriate answer for all other questions. Project Name and Address: ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FACTORS 1.) HISTORIC PRESERVATION o Does the project involve a building greater than 50 years old? · If yes, does the project involve rehabilitation of some sort? · Are you aware of any historically significant events that have taken place at the site? Note: If the structure is greater than 50 years old and rehabilitation is proposed, the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) must be contacted (as well as any local historic office). If the property is on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), eligible for listing, located in a Historic District, or adjacent to a NHRP, additional action may be required. 2.) FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT · Is the property where the proposed project is located in a Coastal High Hazard Area, flood way or have a finished floor below the 100 year flood plain? · Does the project propose the development of impervious surfaces (roof or concrete)? · If yes, approximately how many square feet of impervious surface will be developed? Note: Property in a flood plain will require flood insurance. If you need help making this determination, you may contact the City of Bremerton, Community Development Office at (360) 473~5211 for information regarding the Floodplain areas of Bremerton. 3.) COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT o Is the proposed project site within 200 ft. of the Ordinary High Water Mark? "Ordinary high water mark" on all lakes, streams, and tidal water is that mark that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the department: PROVIDED, That in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found, the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water. 4.) WETLANDS PROTECTION . Does the site or the adjacent areas of the proposed project have the appearance of a swamp, marsh, or slough? o Does the project appear to be wet (standing water) at any time of the year? 5.) NOISE · Is the proposed project site within 1,000 feet of a Highway (usually a four lane road) . or within 3,000 feet of a Railroad? 6.) ENDANGERED SPECIES . Is the proposed project site a habitat area for any endangered species? 7.) AIR · Do you know if the proposed project site has any asbestos located on the property? 8.) HAZARDS A.) Explosive or Flammable Tanks o Does the site for the proposed project have any visible storage tanks for a flammable substance with in a quarter (1/4) of a mile? o Is the proposed site within a quarter (1/4) of a mile from a loading terminal for a flammable substance? . Does the proposed site have high pressure gas lines or overhead transmission lines present within 200 square feet? B.) Hazardous Waste e Will the proposed project be located on fill land? o If yes, what materials were used for the fill? o Is the project area on or near a site suspected of posing a potential environmental hazard such as a dump, land fill, or industrial location containing hazardous wastes? 9.) LAND USE HISTORY o What, if any, prior uses existed on the property? I UNDERSTAND THAT UPON SUBMITTAL OF THIS APPLICATION, NO FURTHER FUNDS, OF ANY KIND, CAN BE SPENT ON THIS PROJECT UNTIL A HUD APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS COMPLETE. FUNDS BEING SPENT ON THE PROJECT AFTER APPLICATION SUBMITTAL COULD JEOPARDIZE THE ELIGIBILITY OF THE PROJECT FOR HUD FUNDS. Note: A "Yes" response to any of these questions may be an indicator that some form of mitigation could be required for the project. Signature of Agency Director Name (PRINTED) Date fsn;; ",A~enC'N()[)B(sI'~QME,llfllstor,\1:\Eol)m'f" i; ,., ....,'."".".. ~'" f:t:~~~,:~~~~~:'~.; ,~:~_--)~:,-:;, f !i~.~~;l~ ~~~.~~"'L4'.~r~~}~:::';;2L>;/-~~ ~d~:_:'_~~-~~] '~-~ :~=;;~ j;~:~ :'_~:; '-;,./1 :l~~~;-tk!r!L::.\-;:i"~l.;'':/:_? t.ri'';;~..';.i. ~\~~~- >~D-,~. :." '~;.:::r~:;.~:}tt~;F!.:. "._ Agency Name Project Name Provide a history of your agency's management of CDBG and/or HOME Projects since 2002. ~ '.'{'.'.:..""';"':;~'>';i'~':i.';".;.." .'......"'....': .....~.....;;....;...::,.'" :.;.-';.'.:.."'............'. I..:.; ~~~~". if" r.g.,I~~!J.;'r;:....;:; ';;':tJ,difar;;,';'; {.,'\:RUnd~/.,:~': : : ..... '/:.: !};;J;;c, , '0.. :;;Am;6U~t:i ::'~;Ei':~Wd~dr~' . '.; "5' " ".,:":,} ....;;. .},;!;;1.;&' '\'.,,',,,"" .".,.,.,' ,'n.,R,.,..,,,.,~...\, ,';A' :;q ,.:",\,. :"'. '. :'1: ;i:;.~:~'\'.'$, ': <ib"'''y'': '1)'6"/'3"'0'/0' ''-';,<; s'" /'i. 1'i:<:',1 ',L .,.,..;;,;; ','.,' ;n, t.': "";';V"''',,,,c<..':;:- ,,,,,.,,..,,,;t.,,,,,.,."""!:-.!">:' S ~..'-+ .. ."v~. ".~..P L ,Co. L'-- .-- <_ _ ~,--_ _.-',_^",~ '_'/'W" __~'~_': '~".",,"__"'~'~'" CDBG . HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME o o o o o o o o o o o o o o .., ~k1~~~~~~~) COUNTY 0 CITY 0 COUNTY 0 CITY 0 COUNTY 0 CITY 0 COUNTY 0 CITY 0 COUNTY 0 CITY 0 COUNTY 0 CITY 0 COUNTY 0 CITY 0 What is the agency's insurance program for general liability/officers and board/volunteers, etc.? Please attach a copy of your current policy. Does the agency have any threatened or pending litigation? No Yes (if yes, attach explanation) Does the agency have any audit or IRS problems? No Yes (if yes, attach explanation) Authorized Signature Date '~~,~ ~,~" . ~~:'~i:~{.~; ;:L~~'Z,':::::(~~ ~:~t~ :.:-2'- :..'~(~-'~i_:"L:. {" L::<~~'-' __ ~l<:..?_ ~~ ~~~;'~~ ;7~-,e~,:r;;,~-~ ~,~ _ .~.,;/~~.<~_--_::~~~~~;';}~>;~r~~:- " "', ....'~~FrACH'Me.~;l[m'~'3 "~,!,", ""'.'~"W ;)~i~~~~~~~j~1tt~~:~fi#~l&~tt~~~~1~:i~~1~11:L, Agency Name Project Name "::\}:t:\'~:~~~i@it~rl. Number of professional FTEs Number of clerical FTEs ~':i~~~8~E~qj~6f~!?BQ~~~t::': ' Number of all other FTEs :,~.~j~frl~~fit~~~:i??;::.J.:,':::?};';:,;Y~~~;'::~;"~; Salary of Director Salaries of Professional Staff Salaries of Clerical Staff Other Salaries Description Description Description Description _ __d ~ Totals Total Payroll Cost (including payroll taxes) Total Cost of Benefits Total Cost of Retirement Total Salary and Fringe Costs 2008 Community Development Block Grant HOME PROJECT APPLICATION Use this application for projects which provide decent, affordable housing through construction, rehabilitation, rental and homeownership subsidies :1,:" ";,,;,,?,, .:' ",", '~..' '?j:' ,.~'3"""""'n'''''::<:'''Arnr.\ll(}atlon),Ool'ltents,1:enecKlist::", \' ',,; "~';"i"","":, ", ~"', ,","",,"," 2007 /2008 HOME Funding Application Form Response to Rating Factors Attachments Attachment A (Organizational Capacity) A-1 An organizational chart showing all staff, board members and volunteer positions A-2 Organizational Data (i.e. 501 (c)(3), public charter...) A-3 Non-Discrimination Policies Attachment B (Organizational Financial Management) B-1 Most recent monthly financial statement including year-to-date information B-2 Most recent Financial Audit or Financial Statement prepared by a CPA, including findings. If your audit exceeds 50 pages, please include an executive summary and one copy of the full audit. B-3 A statement of experience including operating statements and lander references and record of performance, qualifications, capacity to carry out the project described in this application, and capacity to manage grants. B-4 IRS 990 (for non-profits) B-5 Secretary of State CHO-1 Form (for non-profits) B-6 Secretary of State Non-Profit Corporate Annual Report (for non-profits) Attachment D (Project Feasibility) D-1 Commitment letters from other funding sources for this project D-2 Management Plan D-3 Plans and Specs for the Project D-4 Relocation Plan, if appropriate **D-5 Preliminary Environmental Review Checklist **D-6 Agency CDBG/HOME History Form **D-7 Salary Summary D-8 Annual Report. If your report exceeds 50 pages, please include a summary and one copy of the full report. Include Agency Mission Statement **D-9 Agency Board Profile, attach the names and addresses of Board Members **Form provided within packet 007 /2008 HOME FUNDING APPLICATION FORM HOME Funding Request $ Project Title (If this project has been previously funded, please use the same title) Project Description Funds will be used to (25 words or less with specific numbers/goals): Project Location (physical address) Geographic Service Area Census Tract(s) Number of Unduplicated People Directly Benefiting from this Project Applicant Name Mailing Address Agency Director Name e-mail address Telephone # Staff Contact Name and Title e-mail address Telephone and Fax # Federal Tax I.D. # Type of Organization: Public Agency Private Nonprofit Other (Specify) Are you a Certified Housing Development Organization (CHDO)? If not, are you planning on becoming a Certified CHDO? DYes D No DYes D No Authorized Signature Date , c"o:e ",,,,"'i'c .#'."'.. ~/~'11t1@M'E"'Rffi0JE'GT'IRA.TING"E1i€TQRS ,',"" ". ,,,......,,.."' ';':,,"('T,",' . 1. A licant Profile Applicant Profile (see attached instructions): 2. Proiected use of HOME funds -- Proposed Proiect Proposed project: Tenure of recipients: check one o New construction o Substantial rehabilitation (> $25,000) o Moderate rehabilitation (< $25,000) o Tenant Based-Assistance o Other _' o Renters DOwners 3. Need Describe the need for the proposed project. The description should incliJefe characteristics such as cause, extent, and location of the specific need and should be in measurable and quantitative terms. Describe how you determined that the project is the most appropriate method to address the need and the proposed impact the project is expected to have. 4 G I P . I f . enera rOlect n ormation Explain how the project is consistent with the Consolidated Plan: Is the project identified / prioritized in any other community or agency plan? If so, identify the plan and explain how the project fits with the plan. Project address: City: State: Zip Code: Bremerton WA Identify the service area of the project: ~ Please attach a project map that identifies the project location(s) 5. Sources of Financin - All Pro"ect Fundin Sources Source (Name) Committed Conditional Tentative a. Federal: HOME $ $- $ (Application Amount ) $ $- $ b. State: $ $- $ $ $ $ c. Local: $ $- $ $ $- $ d. Applicant: $ $ $ $ $- $ e. Private: $ $ $ $ $- $ f. In-kind: $ $- $ $ $- $ Subtotals: '! :(,< ,~.!'" ,",.~~({ ;""; ,-,;" ,,~". " '''',,; .:' ,,,'-,_ ',',,':._0.',' '. ;;','_,"_. ',';_ ';1' .~-,;:-> ,",~ <:"'l~\-f:':~~:,-) ~i:/'; ~ ~('; ':,:~ ':: ,':_y~:~~::.\t~'~.>: .~..'":!;1 ~~:::;, ,_," :.'.:'<~,' ,"~j ,:1, ; .,': :;T0T Ab'ALLFUNOING SOURCES -< , '''r:.-;; T ;_'..-,-, ~ ,-->~- ~'''',' ;:~;.,,~,:, -\ >.".."" . 1 ... (~>":;:'> " -"":_,~ ,_ 'l ',,~i, ',: ~'~',:2./~;{;,~S ':~i.;" ~:)"',,',{ "t...'\ u F All F s 6. ses of mancmg - undmg ources Project Cost Amount HOME HOME Other (City) (County) Source of Funds ACQUISITION COSTS: Acquisition Homebuyer assistance Other SUBTOTAL RELATED SOFT COSTS Appraisal Architect Engineering Design Processing/Settlement and Financing Costs Audit Affirmative Marketing Operating Reserve Other SUBTOTAL DEVELOPMENTAL HARD COSTS New Construction Rehabilitation Improvements - -- -r;t, Demolition Other SUBTOTAL OTHER COSTS Relocation CHDO operating expenses Tenant Based Assistance Other SUBTOTAL OPERATING COSTS (generally not HOME costs) Services Rent/Mortgage Subsidies Operating Other SUBTOTAL ?[gI~1;;~~~~:~,~tl~~~;r:,);:.!:t;;i;:::,~.t;. e:\r;/.i~;:;;:: ",,~;;. is; '".':,;""",;';)::..,n;:",; c,', :"\,, ((';",;, ,1~Y I ~';t .,"" ::'il . ;'; :~ ';';:';;' ",' .,.' ;, **Note: Total Project Cost must be equal to Total all Funding Sources on the Source of Funds statement. 7. Sources of Cost Estimates ~ Summarize and attach cost estimates Attach: earnest money agreement, option or closing statement for land and/or building(s); construction cost estimate; construction contract or preliminary bid(s); agreements governing the various reserves which are capitalized at closing; appraisal; and if low income housing tax credits are utilized, documentation on the syndication costs from the organization/individual who will syndicate and sell the offering. Provide supporting documentation for all other costs. 8. Total Per-Unit Cost Total Project Development Cost: Total Number of Units in the Project: Cost per unit: 9. Match Contribution a. Total HOME funds requested $- b. Match contribution $_ c. Match is % of HOME reauest d. Description of match contribution: 10. Use of HOME funds a. Development hard costs b. Acquisition costs c. Related soft costs d. Relocation costs e. Costs related to TBRA f. CHDO operating expenses g. Total HOME-Assisted Cost: h. Total Number of HOME-assisted Units j. HOME cost per unit $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- *Note: A maximum HOME subsidy of $30,000 per unit is allowed for homeownership ro"eets and $131,753 er unit for rental ro'eets. See a e 4 of the Polie Plan. 11 P t Ob" r IT k IS h d I rOlec .Iec Ives as s c e u e List the specific tasks to complete and manage this project, the total amount required to meet the task, the amount that will be paid using HOME funds, the source of any other funds needed to complete the task, the date when you will start the task and the date when it will be completed. Include tasks through the period of affordability. Specific tasks Total HOME Other Sta rt End Date Cost Cost Sources Date 0 See Attached 0 0 " I!l 0 . 0 . . 12. Lon~ Term Affordabilitv Indicate the number of years the project will be retained as affordable housing for your target income level and how this will be accomplished, for example, land covenants or deed restrictions. (See Policy Plan and attached instructions for requirements.) If the project is for assistance to homebuyers, include a specific description of the resale/recapture procedures that will be used. Project will remain affordable for years 13. Minority and Women Owned Businesses Identify the types of notices, bid procedures, and direct outreach that will occur in regard to recruitment of minority and women owned businesses for this project. 14. Affirmative Marketina (see attached instructions) If your project is for . homeownership you must answer questions 15 and 16 (you do not need to answer questions 17, 18, 19, 20, or 21) and include the attachments in 22. · rental housing you do not need to answer questions 15, 16, 20 or 21, but you must answer 17,18,19 and include the attachments in 22. . tenant based assistance you do not need to answer questions 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 21, but you must answer 20 and include the attachments in 22. 15. Homeownership Requirements Describe the method of assuring that (1) All of the HOME funds will assist low income homebuyers, or existing low-income homeowners, whose family incomes are at or below 80% of the area median family income (see page 19 of the Policy Plan). (2) The assisted housing will be the owner's principal residence; and (3) The purchase price of the property, or the appraised value of a property already owned after rehabilitation will be less than 95% of the median area purchase price. o h' I T 16. Home wners IP ncome argetmg Please provide the information requested in the followinc table Size of House and Income Number Monthly Targeted Assumed PITI Median Comments Level of Payment Maximum Family I divided Income* Houses (PITI) HH Household by adjusted for I Units income Size monthly family size Income ONE BEDROOM % of Median Income* % of Median Income % of Median Income TWO BEDROOM % of Median Income % of Median Income % of Median Income THREE BEDROOM % of Median Income % of Median Income % of Median Income FOUR BEDROOM % of Median Income % of Median Income % of Median Income TOTAL ! *Median Income = Median Family Income. Median Family Income is determined periodically by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on the basis of state and local earnings data and is published for cities and counties. See Page 19 of the Policy Plan. 17. Rental OperatmQ Statement Provide operating statements for # of years project will remain affordable to very low and low income households. After year 5, projections may be in 5-year increments. (you may provide a more detailed statement in vour own format) A. Operating Income: Gross Rent Receipts less Vacancy Rate _ % Other Income Total Operating Income B. Operating Expenses Sewer/Water Electricity Gas Garbage Maintenance Management Advertising Reserves Other Expenses Total Operating Expenses C. Net Operating Income $- D. Total Debt Service (complete table below) $- E. Net Cash flow (Net Operating Income less Debt Service Total) $- Debt Service: loans or other Amount Monthly Payment Annual Payment Loan 1 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- Loan 2 Loan 3 Total Annual Debt Service $- rOJec en c e u e Provide the information requested in the followinq table Type of Unit # of Targeted Targeted Proposed Tenant Tenant Type of Proposed rent units Family Household Monthly paid Monthly subsidy as % of income Size Income Rent Utilities! Rent (if any) Services** Plus Utilities SRO % of Median Income* % of Median Income % of Median Income ONE BEDROOM % of Median Income % of Median Income % of Median Income TWO BEDROOM % of Median Income % of Median Income % of Median Income THREE BEDROOM % of Median Income % of Median Income % of Median Income I TOTAL I I I ,=: I I I I I ** List utilities and services to be paid bv tenant: , 18 P . t R t S h d I *Median Income = Median Family Income. Median Family Income IS determined perrodlcally by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on the basis of state and local earnings data and is published for cities and counties. See Page 19 of the Policy Plan. ) 19. HOME Rents Describe the process that will be established to assure that the rents charged in HOME assisted rental projects do not exceed the allowable amount under HOME program regulations. (see attached instructions) 20. Tenant Based Rental Assistance Describe actions you will take to assure the project meets the requirements of 92.210 and 92.211 including tenant selection policies, lease requirements, rent reasonableness, terms of any rental assistance contract and maximum subsidies. 21. Additional Information Provide any additional information you think may help us evaluate your application. Please limit the amount of additional information to four pages. 22. Attachments. Please provide the following attachments with your application and copies: Attachment A (Organizational Capacity) A-1 An organizational chart showing all staff, board members and volunteer positions A-2 Organizational Data (i.e. 501 (c)(3), public charter...) A-3 Non-Discrimination Policies Attachment B (Organizational Financial Management) B-1 Most recent monthly financial statement including year-to-date information B-2 Most recent Financial Audit or Financial Statement prepared by a CPA, including findings. If your audit exceeds 50 pages, please include an executive summary and one copy of the full audit. B-3 A statement of experience including operating statements and lender references and record of performance, qualifications, capacity to carry out the project described in this application, and capacity to manage grants. B-4 IRS 990 (for non-profits) B-5 Secretary of State CHO-1 Form (for non-profits) B-6 Secretary of State Non-Profit Corporate Annual Report (for non-profits) Attachment D (Project Feasibility) 0-1 Commitment letters from other funding sources for this project 0-2 Management Plan 0-3 Plans and Specs for the Project 0-4 Relocation Plan, if appropriate **0-5 Preliminary Environmental Review Checklist **0-6 Agency CDBG/HOME History Form **0-7 Salary Summary 0-8 Annual Report (include Agency Mission Statement). **0-9 A Board profile, attach the names and addresses of Board Members **Form provided within packet f*t\r:>'"'\;'~~t~:;1;:~j~1J{~~~lli~~:'_~6ti~~~:,~~~~~H,f~tt~ri;~~~~1~~~~~~;~Y~~ ,;:';'./Ji ,.~.e. " , Jo.nmemtal\f,leMleW,;.Ques:flonmalr::e1'."', ';"".?'<';"JV':?~,""i'<'" ~ ;~. '_Li;' ", - ~.,- - <'Y~,'~ ,;;:-,: ~~ -:-}/ ;~~~:~~'i:~:~~;,'?~.~-~~: !,__,?, :c::~ ~~~ !~~':_(_:_~'5 -\":"i'l::r-:f:<~:. ;:'~~,:::;:'j -~_::J~?::~.~~ :t~~ \:~~~~/'::~';';::-/:i::~\~i~ "_~_ ~i~ ~-j./~~~~\:if:e" At the site under consideration for the project, please make an observation for each of the seven Compliance Factors listed below. Enter a "Y" for Yes or "N" for No in the space for the given condition. Fill in the blank with the appropriate answer for all other questions. Project Name and Address: ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE FACTORS 1. HISTORIC PRESERVATION o Does the project involve a building greater than 50 years old? · If yes, does the project involve rehabilitation of some sort? e Are you aware of any historically significant events that have taken place at the site? ,_ " Note: If the structure is greater than 50 years old and rehabilitation is proposed, the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) must be contacted (as well as any local historic office). If the property is on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), eligible for listing, located in a Historic District, or adjacent to a NHRP, additional action may be required. 2. FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT e Is the property where the proposed project is located in a Coastal High Hazard Area, flood way or have a finished floor below the 100 year flood plain? · Does the project propose the development of impervious su rfaces (roof or concrete)? o If yes, approximately how many square feet of impervious surface will be developed? Note: Property in a flood plain will require flood insurance. If you need help making this determination, you may contact the City of Bremerton, Community Development Office at (360) 473-5211 for information regarding the Floodplain areas of Bremerton. 3. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT o Is the proposed project site within 200 ft. of the Ordinary High Water Mark? "Ordinary high water mark" on all lakes, streams, and tidal water is that mark that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may change thereafter in accordance with permits issued by a local government or the department: PROVIDED, That in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found, . the ordinary high water mark adjoining salt water shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water. 4. WETLANDS PROTECTION · Does the site or the adjacent areas of the proposed project have the appearance of a swamp, marsh, or slough? o Does the project appear to be wet (standing water) at any time of the year? 5. NOISE · Is the proposed project site within 1,000 feet of a Highway (usually a four lane road) · or within 3,000 feet of a Railroad? 6. ENDANGERED SPECIES · Is the proposed project site a habitat area for any endangered species? 7. AIR · Do you know if the proposed project site has any asbestos located on the property? 8. HAZARDS Explosive or Flammable Tanks o Does the site for the proposed project have any visible storage tanks for a flammable substance with in a quarter (1/4) of a mile? CD Is the proposed site within a quarter (1/4) of a mile from a loading terminal for a flammable substance? III Does the proposed site have high pressure gas lines or overhead transmission lines present within 200 square feet? Hazardous Waste o Will the proposed project be located on fill land? G If yes, what materials were used for the fill? o Is the project area on or near a site suspected of posing a potential environmental hazard such as a dump, land fill, or industrial location containing hazardous wastes? 9. LAND USE HISTORY o What, if any, prior uses existed on the property? I UNDERSTAND THAT UPON SUBMITTAL OF THIS APPLICATION, NO FURTHER FUNDS, OF ANY KIND, CAN BE SPENT ON THIS PROJECT UNTIL A HUD APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS COMPLETE. FUNDS BEING SPENT ON THE PROJECT AFTER APPLICATION SUBMITTAL COULD JEOPARDIZE THE ELIGIBILITY OF THE PROJECT FOR HUD FUNDS. Note: A "Yes" response to any of these questions may be an indicator that some form of mitigation could be required for the project. - -- 'C'\ Signature of Agency Director Name (PRINTED) Date Pf):;t,1::i~~'i~':i~~~'~~~~I::~~~~.jf:~i~~1~~[~;~~",7:,5 ,.(;l~(?).M,E'itf I s:t0r~I;"F0rmC~j z~1:i1~~1~-\L~:=~~t- :./:~:,:~: ._~~': :~~,t:~'~~ --,f&~t~~f.:~~~~~r;_~;:f~~':r~i~' :~~i~-.;1:-_:~):t:3,: ;>,;..,~.. :.~,~,. _ Agency Name Project Name Provide a history of your agency's management of CDBG and/or HOivlE Projects since 2002. ~~DFli1 ~r~f~ltl;~! -,\b,";;0613010'l ,'~ . ~,:_:,.JY_ j:, ~ ~,:''"',:.Jt..,., " '1';1!",~{ CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME CDBG HOME What is the agency's insurance program for general liability/officers and board/volunteers, etc.? Please attach a copy of your current policy. , -'-.:~ ~. ;. 0 COU NTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COU NTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 0 COUNTY 0 0 CITY 0 Does the agency have any threatened or pending litigation? No Yes (if yes, attach explanation) Does the agency have any audit or I RS problems? No Yes (if yes, attach explanation) Authorized Signature Date Agency Name , ~,", Project Name .'";:,~ ,"1:r.+ ~ ~,: ~; _:-;E':i ,:;~' ':~:/:-:"/ .~~\.,.' c'[)~$9ripti(jrf " ' ';'?B~6r~/()j~'~(~~~~&2~Jt Number of professional FTEs Number of clerical FTEs Number of all other FTEs .i~~t~~~j~h!~f~~ii~~;ri Salary of Director Salaries of Professional Staff Salaries of Clerical Staff Other Salaries Description Description Description Description Totals Total Payroll Cost (including payroll taxes) Total Cost of Benefits Total Cost of Retirement Total Salary and Fringe Costs CITY OF BREMERTON HOME Application Instructions General Applicant Information: ApPLICANT: ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSONITITLE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: The organization submitting the application Address of applicant agency For this project For applicant agency and the contact person TITLE AND SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL The title and signature of the person authorized to sign contracts for the organization. Indicate, in this section, if you are applying for the CHDO set aside. A CHDO checklist or a letter indicating you have been predetermined to be a CHDO in The City of Bremerton, must be submitted with the application. The applicant has the option of having the application considered only in the CHDO set-aside competition, or considered in both the CHDO set aside competition and the general competition. 1. Applicant Profile: The organization that will administer the project must describe its record of performance, qualifications, and capacity to carry out the project described in the application. Any recent (within the past year) housing activities that have been administered should be described. The applicants role, and if appropriate the role other entities will have, in carrying out the proposed project (i.e. developer, owner, investor, manager, etc.) must be described. 2. Projected Use of HOME Funds Indicate if the proposed project is: New construction newly built or built within the last 12 months adding additional unit(s) outside existing walls Rehabilitation Substantial: development cost per unit is greater than $25,000 Moderate: development cost per unit is less than $25,000 Homeowner Assistance Tenant Based Rental Assistance Indicate if proposed recipients of HOME assistance will be renters or owners. 3. Need Describe the need for the project. How long has the need existed. Are any other activities currently being undertaken in the community to address the need? If appropriate, identify any new emerging needs that are not met through any of the existing agencies or programs. Where did you get the information included in this section? Quantify information when possible 4. General Project Information Describe what your project is. Provide sufficient detail to give the reader a clear understanding of the nature of the activity to be undertaken. Include "who, what, where, how, and why." Be as specific as possible. This is an opportunity to "make the case" for your project. Include information concerning the housing standards that will be met. List the specific objectives to be met. Displacement of people or businesses is discouraged. If your proposal is likely to result in displacement, discuss it in this section and include relocation assistance, as appropriate, in the use of funds section. Explain how the project is consistent with the Consolidated Plan. See page 6 of the Policy Plan for more information Explain how / if the project is prioritized in another community or agency plan. Address: Provide the street address for the project. If project sites have not been identified, provide the address of the Agency applying for the funds. Service Area: Provide the service area for the "project" not the Agency, unless the service areas are the same. Identify the neighborhood, City or County by Name. Project area Map: Attach a map that best shows the "project service area. Identify the project location on the map. 5. Sources of Financing- All Funding Sources: Please list the sources of all funds required to complete the prejsGt." a. Federal: list all specific sources of federal funds required to complete the project. Indicate if the amounts are committed, conditional or tentative. Provide the date you will be given a notice of a firm commitment or denial if the funds are conditional or tentative. b. State: list all specific sources of State funds required to complete the project. Indicate if the amounts are committed, conditional or tentative. Provide the date you will be given a notice of a firm commitment or denial if the funds are conditional or tentative. c. Local: list all specific sources of local funds required to complete the project. Indicate if the amounts are committed, conditional or tentative. Provide the date you will be given a notice of a firm commitment or denial if the funds are conditional or tentative. d. Applicant: list all specific sources of funds to be provided by the applicant that are required to complete the project. Indicate if the amounts are committed, conditional or tentative. Provide the date you will know if the funds will be committed for any amounts listed as conditional or tentative. e. Private: list all specific sources of private funds required to complete the project. Indicate if the amounts are committed, conditional or tentative. Provide the date you will be given a notice of a firm commitment or denial if the funds are conditional or tentative. f. In kind contribution: includes volunteers, supplies and other contributions for which a cash value can be assigned. Attach a description of any in-kind contribution listed, including dollar value and the basis for the value determination. g. Subtotals:: provide the total of lines a through f for the amount in the committed column, conditional column, and tentative column. h. Total All Funding Sources This is the sum total of the three columns in item g (subtotal) 6. Uses of Financing - All Funding Sources Identify the budget required for the specific project. Amount: List the costs, by category for the total project budget. Subtotal: Provide the total for each of the sections. Source of Funds: Identify the specific source of funds that will be utilized for the budgeted cost. 7. Sources of Cost Estimates Indicate the source of cost estimates used to determine funds, and distribution of funds, required to complete the project. 8. Total Per Unit Cost Total project development cost: This amount should be the same amount as in question 7 "Total Project Cost." Total number of Units in the Project: Identify the number of units in the project. Cost per unit: Divide the total project development cost by the cost per unit. 9. Match Contribution a. Total HOME funds requested: This amount should be the same as in question . - "-- 1l'I 9(g). b. Match contribution: The amount of match contribution that will be provided. c. Match percentage: The match contribution (b) divided by the HOME funds requested (a). d. Description of the match contribution: Include a detailed description of the source of the contribution. (For example if the contribution is cash, land or real property, describe where it is coming from; if the match is donated or voluntary labor describe who will provide it). Include the status of the contribution, is it committed, conditional, or tentative. Explain the status. 10. Use of HOME funds Identify costs that are proposed to be paid with HOME funds. Eligible costs are described in HOME regulations 92.206 and are briefly outlined below. a. Developmental Hard Costs are the actual cost of constructing or rehabilitating housing. Costs 0 demolish existing structures and for improvements to the project site that are in keeping with improvements of surrounding, standard projects, and costs to make utility connections are considered developmental hard costs. b. Acquisition Costs are the costs of acquiring improved or unimproved real property. c. Related Soft Costs are other reasonable and necessary costs incurred by the owner and associated with the financing, or development (or both) of new construction, rehabilitation or acquisition of housing assisted with HOME funds. These costs include, but are not limited to: · Architectural, engineering or related professional services required to prepare plans, drawings, specifications, or work write-ups; Costs to process and settle financing for a project, such as private lender origination fees, credit reports, fees for title evidence, fees for recordation and filing of legal documents, building permits, attorneys, fees, private appraisal fees and fees for an independent cost estimate, builders or developers fees; . Costs of a project audit t · Costs to provide information services such as affirmative marketing and fair housing information to prospective homeowners and tenants; For new construction or substantial rehabilitation, the cost of funding an initial operating deficit reserve, which is a reserve to meet any shortfall in project income during the period of project rent up and which may only be used to pay operating expenses, reserve for replacements and debt service. d. Relocation Costs: are costs of relocation payments and other relocation assistance for permanently and temporarily relocated individuals, families, businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm operation where assistance is required. e. Costs Related to Tenant Based Assistance are rental assistance and security deposit payments made to provide tenant-based rental assistance for a family. f. CHDO Operating Expenses: g. Total HOME Assisted Costs: The total of 11 a through f. h. Total Number of HOME Assisted Units: The total number of units that will be assisted with HOME funds. i. HOME Cost Per unit: The total HOME assisted costs (g) divided by the total number of HOME assisted units (h). 11. Project ObjectiveslTasks/Schedule Specific tasks: Separate the project into tasks, including those tasks which are necessary for project start up, like hiring staff or consultants. List the tasks in this column. For any tasks that will be done by an agency other than the applicant agency, indicate the implementing agency in the same column. These tasks should relate to the objectives described in 5. Total Cost: Enter the cost of accomplishing the task if it is included in the total project cost whether or not HOME funds will be used for the particular task. Some start up costs may be borne by the agency's existing administrative capacity and not charged to the project. The tasks should still be listed in columns b, c, and d. The total of this column should equal the "total project cost" on question 7. HOME Cost: Enter the amount of HOME funds you will use for each task. The total of this column should equal the amount requested from the HOME program Other Sources: Enter the amount of any other funds you will use to complete each task. Start Date: Indicate when you will begin each task. Be thoughtful and specific. Your performance will be monitored using these dates. End Date: Indicate when you will complete each task. be thoughtful and specific. Your performance will be monitored using these dates. 12. Long'Term Affordability Describe the policies and procedures to assure units remain affordable. Projects involvinQ homeownership One of the purposes of the HOME Program is to increase the supply of affordable housing units over an extended period of time. To this end, homebuyer units must remain affordable for up to 15 years, dependent on the amount of HOME funds invested in each unit. Generally, If the original homebuyer retains title to the property for the full period of affordability, no resale/recapture provisions apply. However, if the property is transferring during the period of affordability the applicant must assure continued affordability in one of two ways: Creation of another affordable unit. Procedures must be outlined to recapture the HOME assistance that was provided to the original buyer and invest it in another homebuyer unit. If proceeds are insufficient to recapture the entire subsidy, the rules permit recapturing a portion of the subsidy based on length of ownership. The HOME investment subject to recapture is the HOME assistance that enables the homebuyer to buy the dwelling. -or- Sale of the property to another low-income buyer who will use it as their principal residence. Procedures must be outlined to assure the sale of the property is at a price which allows for a fair return on equity in addition to being affordable to the subsequent low-income buyer. Proiects involvinQ rental units: Describe the policies and procedures to assure that units will remain affordable for the following terms based on the per unit amount of HOME funds: Rehabilitation of up to $15,000 5 years Rehabilitation between $15,000 and $40,000 10 years Rehabilitation of $40,000 + 15_ye.ar..s New Construction (any amount) 20 years 13. Minority and Women Owned Businesses The HOME program requires the encouragement and use of minority and women owned business enterprises in the implementation of HOME program activities. Describe your plans for affirmative marketing to minority and women owned businesses. Identify the types of notices, bid procedures and direct outreach that will occur in this regard. 14. Affirmative Marketing HOME regulations require affirmative marketing of housing units assisted with HOME funds. Describe the methods of affirmative marketing that will be undertaken as part of the HOME-assisted project. Affirmative marketing steps consist of actions to provide information and otherwise attract eligible persons from all racial, ethnic, and gender groups At a minimum, project sponsors will be required to use affirmative fair housing marketing practices in soliciting renters or buyers, determining their eligibility, and concluding all transactions. Any HOME assisted housing must comply with the following procedures for the duration of the applicable compliance period: Project sponsor advertising of vacant units must include the Equal Housing Opportunity logo or statement (newspapers, radio, television, brochures, leaflets, sign in a window, etc.) · The project sponsor will be required to solicit applications for vacant units from persons in the housing market who are not likely to apply for the housing without special outreach (e.g. use of community organizations, places of worship, employment centers, fair housing groups, etc) The project sponsor must maintain records containing documentation of all marketing efforts (e.g. copies of newspaper advertisements, memorandums of telephone calls, copies of letters, etc.). A listing of all tenants residing in each unit at the time of application submittal through the end of the compliance period must also be maintained. Records to assess the results of the affirmative fair housing marketing actions must be available for inspection by The City of Bremerton HOME administrators. 15. Homeownership Requirements Describe the method of assuring that All of the HOME funds will benefit families whose incomes are at or below 80% of the area median income. · The assisted housing will be the owner's principal residence · The purchase price of the property or the appraised value of a property already owned, after rehabilitation will be less than 95 percent of the median area purchase price. 16. Ownership Income Targeting Provide the information requested for HOME assisted units Size of House and Income Level: Under the bedroom size, indicate the targeted income. - --- """ Number of Houses: Identify the number of HOME assisted houses by bedroom size and targeted income Monthly PITI: Identify the projected Principal, Interest Taxes, and Insurance (PITI) by bedroom size and targeted income. Targeted Maximum Household Income: Identify the maximum targeted income by bedroom size and percent of median income. Assumed Family Size: Provide targeted family size by bedroom size and percent of median income. PITI divided by Monthly Income: Divide the monthly PITI by the monthly targeted household income. Median Income adjusted for family size: Identify the median income based on the family size (see attached chart) 17. Operati ng Statement Provide operating statements for the number of years the project will remain affordable to very low and low income households. After year 5, projections may be in 5 year increments. 18. Projected Rent Schedule Rental projects must provide the information requested for units assisted with HOME funds. List by type of unit, the number of units, the targeted family size, the targeted household income, the proposed monthly rent, the tenant paid utilities and services (identify utilities and services to be paid by the tenant at the bottom of the chart), the type of subsidy if any (this should have been discussed previously)and the proposed rent divided by the monthly income. 19. Home Rents Describe the process you will establish to assure that: 80% of the HOME assisted units in the project have rents which are 30% of adjusted income for households at 65% of median income, minus tenant paid utilities. (HOME regulations require that 80% .the lower of either: '0' The Section 8 Fair Market Rents (FMR) for existing housing., minus tenant paid utilities -OR- * rents which are 30% of adjusted income for households at 65% of median income, minus tenant paid utilities. · At least 20% of HOME assisted units have rents that are equal to or less than 30% of annual incomes for households at 50% of median income minus tenant paid utilities. Properties with 1 or 2 units are exempt from this rule. 20. Tenant Based Rental Assistance (if applicable) I Tenant Selection Policies Describe the status of your program in relation to the regulations at 92.210 and 92.211. The requirements are briefly listed below. General Requirements - Tenant Selection Policies for all HOME assisted units: · Families must be selected in accordance with written tenant selection policies and criteria that are consistent with the requirements of 92.211 (2). Do you already have selection procedures or will you develop them after contract award; · Rents must be reasonable, based on rents that are charged for comparable unassisted rental units · The lease between the tenant and owner must comply with requirements of 92.253; · The housing occupied by a family receiving tenant-based assistance must meet the Section 8 housing quality standards; Rental Assistance The rental assistance contract providing assistance with HOME funds may not exceed 24 months, but may be renewed, subject to the availability of HOME funds; The amount of monthly assistance that may be provided to a family may not exceed the difference between the standard unit rent and 30% of the family's monthly income; · The standard for the rent will be based on either local market conditions; or may not be less than 80% of the Section 8 Fair Market Rents, or more than the FMR; A minimum tenant contribution to the rent must be established; Security deposits Loans or grants can be provided to low income families for security deposits, even when other tenant based assistance is not provided; The HOME funds that may be provided for a security deposit may not exceed the equivalent of two month's rent for the unit; 21. Additionallnformation Provide any additional information you think may help us evaluate your application. >- Senior & Staff & Board - Total Low Racial Categories "(j Total Profile D-9 "2 Minorities Income .l: - Totals w Z(f) CD @ g; C ow C C Q) Q) 0 co ..c '- ca :t::: .-'- co i=iI C - C "Ocou (/l Q) "0 co ~ - Q) ~..c ..c ~06 EZ:E , <( ro '- Q) ..c >, <(0 u (/l 0"0 c~$: $: - Q) 0 , -u- c~ --.c cc<( "3 E o...~ 't= C C co "i:: C :>-u ro>, c ~ co co c - co co<( co<(o6 - co coco:::;: :2: Q) >, .5:1 Q) 0 ::)w <( u co- 06 <( u :t::: 'c Q) C o Q) .g c ~ Q):= (/l .5:1 C: Q) .g ~ ~ LL .-=:: :2: :!:: lo........C 01- Q) :::;: .;:: c co- c ~.;:: '-ro .5:1 co - 0 - 0 (f) Q) ....J E - u Q) co Q) co ._ .,5 ~ c.i CD co .::: co u Q). Q) co - , Q) .- C Q.. o N o 0 -::lcoQj' 0<( ..c u ~ c ~ C .;g"'O::l~(,,) ..c ~ E .u) E '6 co co co co E '6 co 'u) ~ E: E-(]) E _ co ..c (/l o .- o .- (/)':.t= (/l u os8Q)c 00 $: (])<( <( <(Ez ZIo... <(Ez <( (])<( <(::06<( Ocr: WI 1-:2: 1-:2: <(0 - c <(- I- ~Q..O Directors Administrators Professionals Technicians Protective Service Worker Para Professionals Office-Clerical Skilled Craft Service Maintenance I , Volunteers I Other Affirmative Action: What is your organization doing to increase or maintain appropriate representation of race, gender, age, income that supports your organization's unbiased treatment of volunteers, (including Board members) or staff. (IE Hiring practices, advertising, promotion, & job applicants)? DATE SUBMITTED: April 18, 2007 BILL # 07-/00 AGENDA BILL CITY OF BREMERTON CITY COUNCIL 78 ........................................................m............................... SUBJECT: Public Hearing and ordinance N05ooCOamending BMC S 17.04.040 Buildings and Construction and several minor amendments to BMC Title 20, the Zoning Code. Committee Meeting Date: April 25, 2007 COUNCIL MEETING Date: May 2, 2007 Department: DCD Presenter: Nicole Ward Phone: 473-5279 SUMMARY: The action before the Council is to conduct a public hearing and adopt Ordinance No.5ooB amending BMC S 17.04.040 and several sections of the Zoning Code, BMC Title 20 including definitions, outright allowed uses for several zones, development standards for several zones, accessory dwelling unit requirements, fencing requirements, landscaping requirements, and sign standards. ATTACHMENTS: A. Ordinance No.5obS including Planning Commissions Findings and Conclusions B. Staff Memo including an amendment narrative and Planning Commission minutes FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None APPROV ALS: DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: CITY ATTORNEY: FINANCE DIRECTOR: MA YOR: " COMMITTEE CHAIR COUNCIL PRESIDENT: CONSENT AGENDA D GENERAL BUSINESS D PUBLIC HEARING RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Ordinance No.5oo~ to amend BMC S 17.04.040 Buildings and Construction and several sections of the Zoning Code, BMC Title 20. COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table D Continue D No Action DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM To: City Council From: Nicole Ward, City Planner Date: April 26, 2007 Subject: Revisions to Zoning Code Amendment Ordinance SUMMARY Staff has revised the proposed ordinance for the Zoning Code amendments based on discussion in the City Council study session Wednesday April 25, 2007. Revisions relate to the accessory structure amendments in sections 3, 7 and 20 of the proposed ordinance. The entire ordinance has been replaced in your packets to include the following revisions: 1. Addition of the following definitions: . "GARAGE" means an attached or detached enclosed accessory structure intended primarily for the storage of private vehicles such as automobiles, light trucks or recreational vehicles. . "CARPORT" means an attached or detached partially enclosed accessory structure intended primarily for the storage of private vehicles such as automobiles, light trucks, or recreational vehicles which is open to the weather on at least two sides. . "SHOP" refer to the definition of "Storage Building" . "STORAGE BUILDING and SHOP" means an attached or detached accessory structure which is used for non-commercial storage of household goods or non- commercial recreational and hobby uses in association with the principal use. 2. Language has been added to sections 7 & 20 to ensure that buildings that do not require a building permit will not count towards the total accessory structure maximum, which is based on 80% of the principal unit not to exceed 1,200 square feet. 3. Language has also been added to sections 7 & 20 to exempt Carports from design requirements so that they will not be required to be made of similar materials or have the same roof pitch as the principal unit. This will not change the requirements for garages, storage buildings or shops. ORDINANCE NO. 5DD8 AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, making a minor amendment to BMC S 17.04.040 Buildings and Construction and several minor amendments to BMC Title 20, the Zoning Code including definitions, outright allowed uses for several zones, development standards for several zones, accessory dwelling unit requirements, fencing requirements, landscaping requirements, and sign standards. WHEREAS, the City Council adopted ordinance 4950 on November 30, 2005 establishing a new Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, through practical use and application of the new Zoning Code the need for several minor modifications have been identified; and WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has establislied a procedure for amending the Zoning Code in Title 20.18.020 (d) of the Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC), which requires amendments to the Zoning Code to be both consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan and to be consistent with other city, state, and federal codes, regulations and ordinances; and WHEREAS, these minor amendments are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, County Wide Planning Policies, The State Growth Management Act, and other city, state, and federal codes regulations and ordinances; and WHEREAS, on February 6,2007 the proposed Zoning Code amendments were circulated to the State Agencies for the requisite 60-day review and comment period; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 2007 the public was notified by a legal advertisement in the Kitsap Sun of the opportunity to make comment and participate in the public hearing held by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2007 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the minor Zoning Code amendments, formulated a recommendation for further Planning Commission Study prior to the recommendation to City Council.; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2007 the public was notified by a legal advertisement in the Kitsap Sun of the opportunity to make comment and participate in the second public hearing held by the Planning Commission; and 1 2007 Zoning Code Amendments WHEREAS, on March 20; 2007 the Planning Commission conducted the second public hearing on the minor Zoning Code amendments and formulated a recommendation to forward the amendments for City Council consideration; and WHEREAS, on February 22, 2007 a SEP A DNS was issued for the proposed action with an administrative appeal deadline of March 8, 2007 and no appeals were filed; and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2007 the public was notified by a legal advertisement in the Kitsap Sun of the opportunity to make comment and participate in the public hearing by the City Council; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 2007 the City Council conducted a public hearing and considered all testimony prior to their decision. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The findings and conclusions adopted by the Planning Commission attached hereto as Exhibit A are adopted and incorporated as if Set forth fully herein. SECTION 2. Section 17.04.040 ofthe Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "W ork Exempt from Permit" relating to Amendments to the International Building Code is hereby amended to no longer require building permits for fences under 6' in height as follows: 17.04.040 AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE - ADMINISTRATION. The following local amendments to the International Building Code previously adopted in BMC 17.04.030 are hereby adopted and incorporated into the International Building Code: (a) General- Building Code Appendices Adopted. Section 101 of the International Building Code, entitled "General," is amended by adding the following new Subsection 101.5: Sec. 101.5 Building code appendices adopted. Appendices C, H, I, and J to the International Building Code are hereby adopted; however, the public works director shall have the authority to enforce and interpret Appendix J and, accordingly, all references to the "building official" in Appendix J shall be substituted with the words "public works director." (b) Duties and Powers of Building Official - Lot Lines and Setback Lines. Section 104 of the International Building Code, entitled "Duties and Powers of Building Official," is amended by adding the following new Subsection 104.12: Sec. 104.12 Lot lines and setback lines. Notwithstanding the authority of the building official to administer and enforce the building code, the building official shall have no duty to verify or 2 2007 Zoning Code Amendments establish lot lines or setback lines. No such duty is created by this code, and none shall be implied. (c) \V ork Exempt from Permit. Section 105.2 ofthe International Building Code, entitled "',"l ark exempt from permit," is amended by amending building exemption number 2 as follo'.'.'s: 2. Fences not over 2 feet high. (d~) Board of Appeals. Section 112 ofthe International Building Code, entitled "Board of Appeals," is amended by substituting Section 112 with the following: Sec. 112 Board of appeals. The City of Bremerton hearings examiner is designated as the board of appeals in order to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations made by the building official relative to the suitability of alternate materials, design, and methods of construction and appeals of the reasonable application and interpretation of the building codes. Appeals shall be made as set forth in section 17.04.140 of the Bremerton Municipal Code. SECTION 3. Chapter 20.40 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Definitions" relating to Accessory Dwelling Units, carports, garages, medical offices and clinics, storage buildings, and shops are hereby amended to read as follows: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) means a second dwelling unit on a lot with an existing principal unit added to or created \vithin an existing single unit residential structure (principal structure) or ',vithin a detached accessory structure (guest house, cottage, or as part of or abo'o'e a garage) for use as a complete, independent or semi-independent living unit with provisions for cooking, eating, sanitation and sleeping, and which complies with the development and design standards contained in this code for ADUs (BMC 20.46.010). "CARPORT" means an attached or detached partially enclosed accessory structure intended primarily for the storage of private vehicles such as automobiles, light trucks, or recreational vehicles which is open to the weather on at least two sides. "GARAGE" means an attached or detached enclosed accessory structure intended primarily for the storage of private vehicles such as automobiles. light trucks or recreational vehicles. MEDICAL OFFICE and CLINIC means an establishment primarily engaged in providing medical, dental or other health care services to patients on the premises, but which excludes facilities for overnight patient care. Medical clinics that do not have facilities for overnight patient care are included. Veterinnry offices and clinics that do not have facilities for o'o'ernight care arc included. "SHOP" refer to the definition of "Storage Building" 3 2007 Zoning Code Amendments "STORAGE BUILDING and SHOP" means an attached or detached accessory structure which is used for non-commercial storage of household goods or non-commercial recreational and hobby uses in association with the principal use. SECTION 4. Section 20.46.010 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Accessory Dwelling Units" is hereby amended to read as follows: 20.46.010 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) may be installed where a new or existinKsingle-family dwelling unit (hereafter-principal unit) is allowed. Accessory Dwelling Units are exempt from density requirements and shall be subject to the following specific development, design and owner-occupancy standards. (a) An ADU shall comply with the development standards of the underlying zone for the principal unit including setbacks, height, and lot coverage. (b) An ADU may be attached or detached from the principal unit.:. only if incorporated into an accessory garage structure. (c) Only one (1) ADU may be created per lot residel)ce. (d) The property owner, which shall include titleholders and contract purchasers, must occupy either the principal unit or the ADU as their permanent residence for at least six (6) months out of the year. (e) An ADU shall be limited to not more than: (1) Sixty Fefty (604{}) percent of the principal unit's total floor area (not including basement) and; (2) One-thousandEight hundred (1,000&00) square feet maximum, nor less than three-hundredJ300) square feet; (3)Tvlo (2) bedrooms. (f) Any attached ADU shall be designed so that the appearance of the building remains that of a single-family residence including the following: (1) Constructed of similar the same materials and siding as the principal unit; (2) A roof of equal or greater pitch as the principal unit; (3) A height not more than twenty-five percent 25% greater than the principal unit not to exceed the height limit of the zone. (g) The entrance to an attached ADU shall not be on the same fa~ade of the structure as an entrance to the principal unit. (h) Accessory Dwelling Units shall provide (1) one off street parking space '.vith up to one bedroom shall pro'v'ide one (1) off street parlcing space, and .\DUs '.vith two bedroom shall provide t'NO (2) off street parlcing spaces in addition to that which is required for the principal uni t. (i) When development of an ADU is for people with disabilities, the Director may allow reasonable deviation from the stated requirements to install features that facilitate accessibility such as those required by the International Building Code. An ADU shall have a deed restriction recorded with the Kitsap County Auditor to indicate the presence of the ADU, the requirement of owner-occupancy, and other standards for maintaining the unit as described above. 4 2007 Zoning Code Amendments SECTION 5. Section 20.46.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Fences and Walls" is hereby amended by as follows: 20.46.020 FENCES AND WALLS (a) Fences and walls shall observe the following height and setback requirements: (1) Residential Zones: (i) Maximum height shall be six (6) feet. (ii) Maximum height within the front yard setback area shall be fourthree (1J) feet-,-; except an open mesh cyclone type fence may not exceed a height of forty eight (48) inches. (iii) On comer lots with a specified front yard setback on each street frontage, both frontages will require a height of no more than four (4) feet. (iv) To obtain a six (6) foot high fence on a comer lot a fence permit is required. Tthe Director can determine that the street frontage of the residence's principal orientation is a "primary frontage" and may permit a six (6) foot maximum height fence in the yard on the other (secondary) frontage only if all of the following conditions are met: a. The higher fence will not block any existing front yard views from an adjoining residence with its principal orientation to that same street; b. The higher fence will not be closer to the residence's front property line on the street of principal orientation than the closest part of the front fac;ade of the residence; c. The higher fence will not encroach into the front yard of the primary frontage where the maximum height limit in BMC Section 20.46.020(a)(1)(ii) takes precedence. (v) Six (6) foot tall side yard fences may not proiect into the front yard setback except when the house's front fac;ade is within the front yard setback area, in which case the taller fence may extend no further than the front fayade of the house. (2) Commercial Zones: (i) Maximum height shall be eight (8) feet. (ii) Maximum height shall be six (6) feet when adjacent to a public right-of-way, or to a residential zone. (3) Industrial Zone: (i) Maximum height shall be ten (10) feet. (ii) Maximum height shall be six (6) feet when adjacent to a public right-of-way, or to a residential zone. (4) District and Neighborhood Center Zones: (i) Maximum height shall be four (4) feet in front yard setback areas. (ii) Maximum height shall be six (6) feet for side and rear yard setback areas. (iii) To obtain an eight (8) foot tall fence a fence permit is required. The Director may allow for a maximum height of up to eight (8) feet in side and rear yard setback areas provided the use is non-residential and the fence is necessary for security purposes. (5) Essential Public Facilities: 5 2007 Zoning Code Amendments (i) Essential Public Facilities may have up to ten (0) foot tall fences in any zone through a fence permit application provided the fence is the minimum necessary for security purposes. (b) A Type II Conditional Use Permit may be granted for fences or walls up to eight (8) feet high in a side or rear yard only if the fence or wall is necessary to provide privacy and security between a residential and a non-residential use. (c) Fences and walls shall not block or hinder the sight distance of traffic. Exact location and design of a fence or wall is subject to the approval of the City Engineer when visibility or public safety is an issue. (d) No electric or electrified fences shall be permitted within the City of Bremerton. (e) Barbed wire or similar wire protective devices are permitted only in industrial zones above a height of six (6) feet provided that adjoining a residential zone, devices may be allowed by approval of a Type II Conditional Use Permit pursuant to BMC Section 20.58.020 only ifthe following criteria are met: (1) The applicant demonstrates that the protective device cannot be installed outside of the specified setback without significantly diminishing the utility of the industrial property; (2) The protective device will be designed to minimize adverse aesthetic impact to the residential use by installing the device behind the lop of a fence or wall or screening the device with landscape; and (3) The applicant demonstrates that the protective device is necessary to provide additional security along the residential property line to protect the industrial premises. (f) Notwithstanding the provisions of (a)(1)ii above, architectural appurtenances such as trellises or entry gates that define a walkway or driveway entry are allowed in a front yard up to ninety (90) inches high, provided that: (1) No individual structural support for such features shall be more than sixteen (16) inches square in section, (2) Any gate shall not obscure more than twenty (20) percent of visibility to the yard as viewed perpendicular to the gate's installation, and (3) Any entry feature greater than three (3) feet in height shall not be more than six (6) feet wide for a walkway entry or more than sixteen (16) feet wide for a driveway entry. (g) All fences shall present a "finished" appearance on its outside face. SECTION 6. Section 20.50.050 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Performance Standards" is hereby amended by including minimum plant size requirements for landscaping areas and to correct a typo in the exemptions for parking as follows: 20.50.050 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Required landscaping shall be provided in the following manner: (a) Street Trees: One tree for every twenty- five (25) linear feet of street frontage, and shall be spaced a maximum distance of thirty-five (35) feet on center, however, trees may be spaced irregularly in natural groupings rather than uniformly spaced except as noted elsewhere in this chapter; 6 2007 Zoning Code Amendments (b) Screening Requirements: (1) Landscaping forming a year-round sight barrier a minimum of five (5) feet in height in a landscaped area at least ten (10) feet wide; or (2) A fence or wall, and/or berm, or combination, no less than five (5) feet high plus shrubs and trees in an area at least five (5) feet wide; (c) Significant Trees: Existing healthy trees located within required landscape areas and undeveloped areas and which will not constitute a safety hazard shall be preserved as follows: (1) . Evergreen trees: Eight (8) inches in diameter or greater, measured four (4) feet above existing grade; and (2) Deciduous trees: Twelve (12) inches in diameter or greater, measured four (4) feet above existing grade; (d) Planting Materials: Plants shall be selected based upon site-specific conditions which may affect plant growth such as sun exposure, soil types, shoreline conditions, adjacent site improvements, etc. New plant materials shall consist of drought resistant species, or other species that are irrigated per the provisions of BMC Section 20.50.060(b) (4) of this chapter or located in high moisture content soils. Plant material selection shall be consistent with the list of approved plant materials recommended for use within areas in the City of Bremerton per BMC section 20.50.040(f) of this chapter. Plant materials shall also b'e coordinated with utility company requirements to avoid conflicts; ( e) Plant Tvpe and Size: Plants shall be sized according to the following: (1) Standard deciduous trees: 1 Y2 in. to 2 in. caliper (2) Small ornamental and flowering trees: 1 Y2 in. to 1 % in. caliper (3) Evergreen trees: 5 ft. to 6 ft. in height (4) Shrubs and ground cover: Adequate size to be consistent with design intent fet(D Deciduous Species Requirement: Landscaped areas and required screening shall consist of no more than fifty percent (50%) deciduous species. ffi( g) Areas Adjacent to Trails and Open Spaces: All developments adjacent to publicly used or designated trails and open spaces in the Comprehensive Plan shall provide one tree per fifty (50) linear feet of the property facing such trails and open spaces in addition to the General Provisions ofBMC Section 20.50.040(d); ~(h) Interruptions: Screening and buffering may be interrupted where necessary for access consistent with the general provisions of this chapter; tht(i) Safety: All fire hydrants are to be free of fences, hedges, and other landscaping obstacles. Shrubs eighteen (18) inches in height and less must not be placed closer than five (5) feet to a hydrant, and shrubs or trees larger than eighteen (18) inches must not be planted closer than twenty (20) feet to a hydrant; @(i) Freestanding Signs: An area around the base of each freestanding sign equal to the sign area must be landscaped to improve the overall appearance of the sign and to reduce the risk of automobiles hitting the sign or supports of the sign. This landscaping must include vegetation and may include other materials and components such as brick or concrete bases, planter boxes, pole covers, or decorative framing; @(k) Outdoor Storage: In addition to any other requirements, storage yards and garbage dumpsters shall be surrounded by a six (6) foot high solid wall or sight obscuring fence. 7 2007 Zoning Code Amendments The wall or fence shall be considered a structure and shall conform to setbacks which may be required for building on street frontage. Outdoor storage of materials shall not exceed six (6) feet in height when visible from a public right-of-way; fk.t(l) Parking Lots: Parking lots shall comply with all of the landscaping requirements for non-residential uses. In addition the following standards shall apply: (1) Parking lot setback areas shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, ground covers, turf grasses, or combinations thereof. Non-living materials shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the landscaped area at maturity; (2) Parking lots shall have at least ten (10) square feet of interior landscaping for each parking space. Required peripheral trees and required landscaped setback areas shall not be included in the interior landscaping calculations; (3) Interior landscaping shall be dispersed as equally as possible throughout the parking lot; (4) Each separate landscaped area shall be a minimum of fifty (50) square feet and shall include at least one tree in combination with shrubs, ground cover or other landscaping materials; (5) Bio-swales and permeable pedestrian access ways through parking lots, connecting landscaped areas, are encouraged and are included in the calculation of required landscaping square footage; (6) Lots larger smaller than thirty (30) spaces, are exempt from internal landscaping requirements if: (i) They have only a single aisle with parking spaces on one or both sides; (ii) They have at least a five (5) foot width oflandscaping across the frontage and along at least one other property line; and (iii) The lot has no internal parking islands or peninsulas; (7) Trees shall be provided along any property line abutting a residential zone at a minimum rate of one (1) tree per each fifty (50) linear feet except along property lines abutting an alley or already occupied by a building or other structure; (8) If not necessary for visual buffering or if other trees are on or near the property line, trees may be irregularly spaced or grouped rather than uniformly spaced on the property line; (9) Whenever possible, mature healthy trees, as defined in BMC Section 20.50.040(e) already existing on the site shall be preserved. Credit may be given by the Director at the time of Site Plan Review for the preservation of such a tree in exchange for the loss of a parking space; fl)(m) Clear Vision Triangle: A clear-vision area shall be maintained at the intersections of streets, alleys and commercial driveways, or combinations thereof as determined by the City Engineer with the following requirements: (1) A clear-vision area shall contain no plantings, fences, walls, other structures, or visual obstructions within a vertical area extending from three (3) feet to eight (8) feet above the ground, measured from the established centerline of the street, alley or driveway; (2) The foregoing provision shall not apply to: (i) A tree trimmed to the trunk within the 3-8 f1. clear area; 8 2007 Zoning Code Amendments (ii) Other plant species that are so planted and trimmed as to leave a clear and unobstructed cross-view in all seasons; (iii) A supporting member or appurtenance to a permanent building lawfully existing on the site. (3) Where the maximum setback conflicts with the Clear Vision Triangle relief from the maximum setback may be granted through a type I director decision. SECTION 7. Section 20.60.060 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Development Standards" relating to development coverage and accessory structures in the R-lO zone is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Lot Standards: Lot development requirements shall be in accordance with BMC Section 20.60.060 and the following standards unless allowed for by law otherwise: (1) Setbacks. (i) Minimum front yard setback is fifteen (15) feet; (ii) Minimum side yard setback is five (5) feet; (iii) Minimum rear yard setback is fifteen (15) feet. (2) Maximum structure height is thirty-five (35) feet: (3) Maximum structure height in R-I0 areas within the Downtown Regional Center shall be pursuant to figure 20.74 (a) and shall supersede'BMC section 20.60.060 (2) above. (4) Minimum lot width is thirty (30) feet; (5) Maximum developmentbuilding coverage is sixty percent (60%). (b) Zero Lot Line (ZLL) Development An attached single-family dwelling and! or garage structure may have a single shared side or rear lot line, and a setback reduced to zero provided the structure complies with building code fire separation requirements. (c) AccessorvDetaehed Structures: The following standards shall apply but are not limited to: attached garages and detached garages, carports, shops, barns, covered patios, cabanas, gazebos, and incidental household storage buildings, excluding accessory dwelling units per BMC Section 20.46.010 and structures not requiring a building permit. (1) The maximum area for all accessory structures garage/carport (attached or detached) area shall be eighty percent (80%) of the principal residential use not to exceed one- thousand two hundred (l,200)five hundred (500) square feet.:. of gross floor area plus ten percent (10%,) of gross floor, provided: (2) Setbacks of detached accessory structures is pursuant to BMC Section 20.44.060. (i) The garage/carport does not exceed 1,000 square feet; (ii) The square footage of anyone garage/carport structure may be increased up to a maximum of 2,000 square feet of gross floor area if the setback from all property lines is increased an additional five (5) feet over the minimum setback requirement for each additional one hundred (100) square feet of structure area exceeding 1,000 square feet. (2) In addition to the requirements prescribed in BMC Section 20.60.060( c)(1), the maximum area of all accessory structures, including attached and detachod garages, carports, barns, covered patios, cabanas, gazebos, and incidental household storage buildings, excluding accessory dVlolling units per BMC Section 20.46.010, is fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area ofthe principal use or five hundred (500) square feot, 'Nhichover is greater, 9 2007 Zoning Code Amendments subject to maximum lot coverage standards. (d) Gara2es. Stora2e Buildin2s and Shops: (1 ) Any garage, storage building or shop structure shall be designed so that the appearance of the building remains that of a single-family residence including the following: (i) Constructed of similar materials as the principal unit; (ii) A roof of equal or greater pitch as the principal unit; (iii) A height no more than twenty-five percent 25% greater than the principal unit not to exceed thirty-five feet (35'). (3) Maximum height of detached accessory structures (including garages) shall not exceed the height of the principal structure. f41 Setback of detached accessory structures is pursuant to BMC Section 20.44.060. (2) Any garage, storage building, or shop may be exempt from the accessory structure size requirements provided it is contained within the principal unit ftBQLGarage carport, and Shop Vehicle Entrance -geef-Setbacks: When the garage vehicle tleer-entrance faces the street, the garage carport, or shop it shall have a front yard setback of at least twenty (20) feet, except as provided in BMC Section 20.44.020 (Traditional Front Yard Setbacks). (e) Lot Area for Parks & Schools: Parks and schools may exceed maximum lot area requirements if approved by a Conditional Use Permit. SECTION 8. Section 20.60.065 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Allowable Density and Lot Area" relating to determining neighborhood compatibility the section is hereby to read as follows: 20.60.065 ALLOWABLE DENSITY AND LOT AREA The purpose of this Section is to establish compatible levels of density within existing neighborhoods. The intent is to allow infill residential development at densities equal to or slightly higher than existing residential densities in the vicinity, to encourage neighborhood compatible infill over time. The following density and lot area standards are applicable to development within the zone: (a) Minimum Density: The minimum required density is five (5) dwellings per acre. (b) Maximum Density: The maximum allowed density is subject to neighborhood compatibility and the neighborhood average lot area as determined in BMC Section 20.60.065(f), and the following corresponding target densities: Neighborhood Average Lot Area: Target Density (Net) (Dwellings Per Acre): (1) Low 7,501sq ft or greater (2) Medium 6,001 sq ft to 7,501 sq ft (3) High 6,000 sq ft or less 6 8 10 (c) Maximum Lot Area: The maximum lot area is 8,712 square feet, with the following exceptions: 10 2007 Zoning Code Amendments (1) The lot area may be modified through the approval of a Residential Cluster Development pursuant to BMC Section 20.58.060; (2) One (1) lot within a proposal for a division ofland may exceed 8,712 square feet provided the remaining lots do not exceed the 8,712 square feet maximum lot size; and (3) A Flag Lot that complies with the requirements in BMC Section 20.44.100 may exceed the 8,712 square feet provided the total area of the Flag Lot does not exceed 13,068 square feet. (d) Minimum Lot Area: The minimum allowed lot area is subject to neighborhood compatibility and the neighborhood average lot area as determined in BMC Section 20.60.065(f), and the following corresponding lot area: Neighborhood Average Lot Area: Minimum Lot Area Allowed: (1) Low 7,501 sq ft or greater (2) Medium 6,001 sq ft to 7,500 sq ft (3) High 6,000 sq ft or less 6,000 sq ft 5,000 sq ft 4,300 sq ft (e) Exception to Minimum Lot Areas and Target Density: (1) The minimum lot area may be modified through the approval of a Residential Cluster Development pursuant to BMC Section 20.58.060, provided the development complies with the maximum density requirement set forth in BMC Section 20.60.065(b). (2) The minimum lot area in a center may be modified pursuant to BMC section 20.60.066 (c) (3) One (1) remainder lot with a proposal for a division ofland may be less than the minimum allowable lot area, provided it is no smaller than 4,300 square feet, and provided the reduction is the minimum necessary to create the other conforming lot(s). (f) Determining Neighborhood Compatibility and Neighborhood Average Lot Area: New development is required to be compatible with the density of the surrounding neighborhood. Compatibility is determined by calculating the average lot area of all existing lots within one hundred fifty (150) feet from the outer boundaries of the site subject to the following standards: (1) All lots greater than 8,712 square feet shall be rounded down to 8,712 square feet to determine average lot area; (2) The current platted orane un-platted tfHf lot boundaries recorded with the Kitsap County Assessor shall be used to determine average lot area; (3) Flag Lots meeting the requirements in BMC Section 20.44.100 shall have their lot area divided by one and one-half (1.5) to be used to determine lot area; (4) All lots containing two (2) or more dwelling units (not including Accessory Dwelling Units) and all lots containing non-residential uses shall be rounded down to 4,300 square feet to determine average lot area; (5) All lots containing multi-family residential uses with twenty five (25) or more units shall be considered ten lots with an area of 4,300 square feet each for the purposes of 11 2007 Zoning Code Amendments this calculation. No further bonus is allowed regardless of the number of units exceeding twenty five (25). (g) Target Density / Minimum Lot Area Discrepancy: Should a discrepancy arise between the number of subdividable lots allowed through the use of the Minimum Allowable Lot Area and the Target Density, the Minimum Allowable Lot Area shall be the controlling factor in cases where nine (9) or fewer lots are being created, and the Target Density shall be the controlling factor in cases where ten (10) or more lots are being created. SECTION 9. Section 20.60.100 entitled "Sign Standards" relating to the R-l 0 zone is hereby amended to clarify the code references as follows: 20.60.100 SIGN STANDARDS Signs shall meet the standards ofBMC Chapter 20.52 and the following: (a) One (1) sign with a sign area of up to eight (8) square feet may be allowed to advertise a permitted Bed & Breakfast provided it matches the architectural features of the primary residence. (b) For a home occupation sign the residential district sign regulations in BMC 20.52.120 shall apply. BB( c) When an established business use is located in the Low Density Residential zone, the special purpose sign regulations in BMC chapter 20.52.130 shall apply. SECTION 10. Section 20.62.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Commercial Corridor is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.62.020 PERMITTED USES The following uses are permitted outright: (a) The following uses provided they do not exceed 20,000 square feet gross floor area: (1) Automobile service and repair excluding outdoor display areas for cars, boats, or other vehicles; (2) Community facility; (3) Day care; (4) Drinking place; (5) Drive-through facility; (6) Education and school; (7) Entertainment use; (8) Finance, insurance and real estate; (9) General office and business service; (10) General retail; (11) Medical office and clinic; (12) Personal service; (13) Physical fitness and health club; (14) Restaurant; (15) Senior center; 12 2007 Zoning Code Amendments (b) 20.46.140. (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Co-location of wireless telecommunications facilities per BMC Section Hotel and lodging place; Museum and gallery; Non-motorized outdoor recreation facility; Public administration use; Residential as a secondary use~~ Veterinary Clinic. SECTION 11. Section 20.62.060 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Development Standards" relating to the Commercial Corridor is hereby amended to use the term "development coverage" consistently as follows: 20.62.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (a) Lot development shall be in accordance with the following standards, unless allowed for otherwise by law: (1) Maximum front yard setback: Five (5) feet. At least sixty-five percent (65%) of the building's front fayade must meet the maximum front yard setback; (2) Minimum side yard setback: Zero (0) except as follows: (i) Residential uses abutting the low density residential zone: Ten (10) feet; (ii) Non-residential uses abutting the low density residential zone: Sixty (60) feet; (3) feet; (60) feet; Minimum rear yard setback. Zero (0); except as follows: (i) Residential uses from the Low Density Residential zone: Ten (10) (ii) Non-residential uses from the Low Density Residential zone: Sixty (4) No maximum density for secondary residential uses. (5) Maximum building coverage. Fifty percent (50%) unless increased per Subsection 20.62.060(b). In no case shall maximum lot coverage exceed seventy-five percent (75%) (6) Maximum development coverage is seventy-five percent (75%) unless increased per BMC section 20.62.060(b). In no case shall maximum development let coverage exceed ninety-five percent (95%). (7) Maximum height. Forty-five (45) feet, except that structures within one hundred (100) feet of the low density residential zone shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height. (8) Maximum building heights within the Downtown Regional Center are pursuant to Figure 20.74(a), and shall supersede BMC Section 20.62.060(a)(7) above. (b) A development that provides the following may have its maximum development and lot coverage increased by adding bonus percentages to the maximum base area percentage provided the total does not exceed the maximum allowed above: (1) Commercia1/ Residential Mixed-Use Development: Twenty percent (20%) bonus; 13 2007 Zoning Code Amendments (2) Development containing seventy-five percent (75%) ofthe building footprint with three (3) and four (4) story buildings: Ten percent (10%) bonus; (3) Ten percent (10%) bonus if a sidewalk ten (10) feet in width or greater is installed extending to the front of the building and continuing along the entire arterial frontage ofthe parcel; (4) Pedestrian through-corridor that provides pedestrian access to a location approved by the Director: Five percent (5%) bonus; (5) Fifty percent (50%) of off-street parking is provided undergr~und or within a building designed for occupancy: Twenty percent (20%) bonus. SECTION 12. Section 20.64.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Wheaton Way Redevelopment Corridor is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.64.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted outright: (a) (b) (c) 20.46.140; (d) (e) (0 (g) (h) (i) 0) (k) (1) (m) (n) (0) (p) (q) (r) (s) All residential uses except Class II group residential; Automobile service and repair; Co-location of wireless telecommunications facilities per BMC Section Community facility; Drinking places; Drive-through facility; Entertainment use; Finance, insurance and real estate; General office and business service; General retail; Hotel and lodging place; Medical office and clinic; Museum and gallery; Park, playground and open space; Personal service; Physical fitness and health club; Public administration use; Restaurant:.t Veterinary Clinic. SECTION 13. Section 20.62.060 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Development Standards" relating to the Commercial Corridor is hereby amended to use the term "development coverage" consistently as follows: 20.64.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. (a) Lot development shall be in accordance with the following standards, unless allowed for otherwise by law: 14 2007 Zoning Code Amendments (1) Maximum front yard setback is five (5) feet except that front yard setback may be increased if the Director finds that such increase is necessary to accommodate pedestrian features per BMC Section 20.64.070 or equivalent. At least sixty-five percent (65%) ofthe building's front fa<;ade must meet the maximum front yard setback; (2) Minimum side yard setback is zero from non residential zones, and thirty (30) feet from the low density residential zone; (3) Minimum rear yard setback is zero from non residential zones, and thirty (30) feet from the low density residential zone; (4) Maximum building coverage. Fifty percent (50%) unless increased per BMC Section 20.64.060(c). In no case shall maximum lot coverage exceed seventy-five percent (75%); (5) Maximum development coverage. Seventy-five percent (75%) unless increased per BMC Section 20.64.060(c). In no case shall maximum developmentlet coverage exceed ninety-five percent (95%); (6) Maximum height. Forty (40) feet, and structures within one hundred (100) feet of the Low Density Residential zone shall not exceed three (3) stories in height. (b) A development that provides the following may have its maximum development and lot coverage increased by adding bonus percentages to the maximum base area percentage provided the total does not exceed the maximum allowed above: (1) Commercial! Residential Mixed-Use Development: Twenty percent (20%) bonus; (2) Development containing seventy-five percent (75%) of the building footprint with three (3) and four (4) story buildings: Ten percent (10%) bonus; (3) Ten percent (10%) bonus if a sidewalk ten (10) feet in width or greater is installed extending to the front of the building and continuing along the entire arterial frontage of the parcel; (4) Projects providing a through-block corridor that facilitates pedestrian access in a location approved by the city: five (5) percent bonus; (5) Proj ects providing at least fifty percent (50%) of their required parking underground or within the building: twenty percent (20%) bonus; (c) Maximum residential density. Twelve (12) units per acre, except on sites in single ownership larger three (3) acres, residential density may be increased to a maximum density of twenty (20) units per acre provided that: (1) Site design provides for internal circulation connections for both pedestrians and vehicles between all portions of the site; (2) Landscaping and/or screening adjacent to a single-family zone district shall be provided per BMC Section 20.50.040( c); (3) A transit stop with shelter is provided at the arterial street frontage. (d) Commercial uses shall be located within two-hundred (200) feet of the arterial street frontage. SECTION 14. Section 20.66.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Neighborhood Center Core is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 15 2007 Zoning Code Amendments 20.66.020 PERMITTED USES Permitted Uses include: (a) (b) 20.46.140; (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (1) (m) (n) (0) (p) (q) (r) (s) Bed and Breakfast; Co-location of wireless telecommunications facilities per BMC Section Community facility; Drinking place; Entertainment use; Finance insurance and real estate General office and business service; General retail; Hotel and Lodging Place containing ten (10) or fewer guest rooms; Medical office and clinic; Museum and gallery; Park, playground and open space; Personal service; Public administration; Transportation facility; Residential as a secondary use; Restaurant; Transportation facilitY~7 Veterinarv Clinic. . SECTION 15. Sections 20.70.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the District Center Core is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.70.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES The following uses are permitted outright: (a) Bed and breakfast; (b) Co-location of wireless telecommunication facility per BMC Chapter 20.46.140; (c) Community facility; (d) Day care facility; (e) Drinking place; (f) Entertainment use; (g) Finance, insurance and real estate; (h) General office and business services; (i) General retail; (j) Group residential facilities class I; (k) Hotel and lodging place; (1) Medical office and clinic; (m) Motion picture theatre; (n) Museum and gallery; (0) Nursing I convalescent home; (p) Park playground and open space; 16 2007 Zoning Code Amendments "(." (q) (r) (s) (t) (u) (v) (w) (x) (y) (z) Personal services business; Physical fitness and health club; Public or private park, playground or open space; Public administration; Residential as a secondary use; Restaurant; School and education; Senior housing complex~ Transportation facility~ Veterinary Clinic. SECTION 16. Sections 20.70.060 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Development Standards" relating to the District Center Core is hereby amended to use the term "development coverage" consistently as follows: 20.70.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Lot development shall be in accordance with the following unless allowed for otherwise by law: (a) Front yard setback. No minimum front yard setback. The maximum front yard setback is ten (10) feet. At least eighty percent (80%) of a building's front fayade shall meet the maximum front yard setback. (b) Side yard setback. Zero (0) from non-residential zones, and ten (10) feet from the low density residential zone. (c) Rear yard setback. Zero (0) from non-residential zones, and ten (10) feet from the low density residential zone. (d) There is no maximum density for residential as a secondary use. (e) Maximum building coverage: Sixty percent (60%) base maximum, provided that through the use of any combination of the following, building coverage may be increased up to eighty-five (85%) maximum. (1) Projects containing mixed uses: ten percent (10%) bonus. (2) Projects with three (3) or four (4) story building: ten percent (10%) bonus. (3) Projects providing a pedestrian oriented plaza or area of at least one hundred fifty (150) square feet along a pedestrian walkway at an intersection comer, bus stop or other key pedestrian area approved by the city. Such areas shall contain seating for at least four (4) people, a trash receptacle and three (3) or more of the following: a pedestrian shelter, a drinking fountain, a bike rack, pedestrian scale lights, pavers on the walkway surfaces, a kiosk, a street vendor station providing food or beverages, trees, an appropriately sized statue or sculpture, or a public restroom. Interior courtyards with these amenities qualify if they would be readily apparent and accessible to pedestrians on adjoining sidewalks: twenty percent (20%) bonus. (4) Projects providing a through-block corridor that facilitates pedestrian access in a location approved by the city: five percent (5%) bonus. (5) Projects providing at least fifty percent (50%) of their required parking underground or within the building: twenty percent (20%) bonus. (f) Maximum developmentffit coverage: Maximum development ffit coverage by 17 2007 Zoning Code Amendments impervious surfaces, seventy-five (75 %) maximum, provided that through the use of any combination of the mechanisms listed in BMC Section 20.70.060(E)(1) through (5) above, up to ninety-five (95%) maximum development coverage may be allowed. (g) Maximum building height: 50 feet. SECTION 17. Section 20.74.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Business Core is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.74.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted: (a) Accessory parking facility; (b) Bed and breakfast; (c) Co-location of wireless telecommunication facility per BMC Chapter 20.46.140; (d) Communication! broadcasting facility; (e) Community facility; (f) Day care facility; (g) Detoxification center; (h) Finance, insurance and real estate; (i) General office and business services; (j) General retail; (k) Group residential facilities class I; (1) Hotel and lodging place; (m) Indoor automobile sales, service, repair, or car wash; (n) Indoor entertainment use; (0) Indoor recreational facility; (p) Medical office and clinic; (q) Motion picture theatre; . (r) Museum and gallery; (s) Parking structure; (t) Personal services business; (u) Physical fitness and health club; (v) Public or private park, playground or open space; (w) Public administration. (x) Public facility; (y) Residential use of all types; (z) Restaurant and drinking place; (aa) Schools and education use; (bb) Social services facility; (cc) Transportation facility; (dd) Veterinary Clinic; (ee) Welfare and charitable services and facility; (ft) Worship and religious facility. 18 2007 Zoning Code Amendments SECTION 18. Section 20.75.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Downtown Core is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.75.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted outright: (a) Community facility; (b) Drinking places; (c) Education and school; (d) Entertainment use; ( e) Finance, insurance and real estate; (f) General retail; (g) General office and business services; (h) Hotels and lodging places; (i) Medical office and clinic; (j) Motion picture theatre; (k) Museum and gallery; (1) Park, playgrounds and open space; (m) Parking structure (n) Personal service business; (0) Public administration; (p) Restaurants; (q) Residential uses ofali types; (r) Transportation facility; (s) Veterinary Clinic; ftB(t) Worship and religious facilities. SECTION 19. Section 20.76.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Downtown Waterfront is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.76.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted outright: (a) Drinking places; (b) General office and business services comprising no more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total gross floor area of a mixed-use development; (c) General retail, including marine retail; (d) Hotels and lodging places; ( e) Parks, playground and open spaces; (f) Residential uses of all types; (g) Restaurants; (h) Structured parking with other permitted use; (i) Transportation facility~ (j) Veterinary Clinic. 19 2007 Zoning Code Amendments SECTION 20. Section 20.79.060 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Development Standards" relating to the Multiple Residential zone is hereby amended to change the accessory structure requirements as follows: (a) Lot development requirements shall be in accordance with the following standards unless allowed for by law otherwise: (1) Density: (i) No maximum density; (ii) Minimum: 5 dwelling units per acre; (2) Setbacks: (i) Minimum front yard setback: Ten (10) feet; (ii) Minimum side yard setback: Five (5) feet; (iii) Minimum rear yard setback: Ten (10) feet; (iv) Zero Lot Line Development: An attached single-family dwelling and/or garage structure may have a shared single side or rear lot line, and a setback reduced to zero (0) provided the structure complies with building code fire separation requirements. (3) Minimum lot area: 3,000 square feet; (4) Maximum height: Height limit pursuant to figure 20.74; (5) Maximum building coverage. Eighty percent (80%); (b) AccessorvDetaehed Structures: The following' standards shall apply but are not limited to: attached garages and detached garages, carports, shops, barns, covered patios, cabanas, gazebos, and incidental household storage buildings, excluding accessory dwelling units per BMC Section 20.46.010 and structures not requiring a building permit. (1) The maximum area for all accessory structures garage/carport (attached or dctached) area shall be eighty percent (80%) of the principal residential use not to exceed one- thousand two hundred (1,200)five hundred (500) square feet of gross floor area plus ten percent (10%) of gross floor, provided: (2) Setback of detached accessory structures is pursuant to BMC Section 20.44.060. (i) The garage/carport docs not exceed 1,000 square feet; (ii) The square footage of anyone garage/carport structure may be increased up to a maximum of2,000 square feet of gross floor area if the setback from all property lines is increased an additional five (5) feet over the minimum setback requirement for each additional one hundred (100) square feet of structure area exceeding 1,000 square feet. (2) In addition to the requirements prescribed in BMC Section 20.60.060( c)(1), the maximum area of all accessory structures, including attached and detached garages, carports, barns, covered patios, cabanas, gazebos, and incidental household storage buildings, excluding accessory dwelling units per BMC Section 20.46.010, is fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area of the principal use or five hundred (500) square feet, 'vvhicheyer is greater, subject to maximum lot coverage standards. (c) Gara!!es. Stora!!e Buildin!!s. and Shops: (1) Any garage, storage building or shop structure shall be designed so that the appearance of the building remains that of a single- family residence including the following: (i) Constructed of similar materials as the principal unit: (ii) A roof of equal or greater pitch as the principal unit; 20 2007 Zoning Code Amendments (iii) A height no more than twenty-five percent 25% greater than the principal unit not to exceed thirty-five feet (35'). (3) Maximum height of detached accessory structures (including garages) shall not exceed the height of the principal structure. ~ Setback of detached accessory structures is pursuant to BMC Section 20A1.060. (2) Any garage, storage building, or shop may be exempt from the accessory structure size requirements provided it is contained within the princit'al unit Wal- Garage, carport and shot' vehicle entrance !fflef-setbacks: When the garage vehicle dooF-entrance faces the street, the garage, carport or shop it shall have a front yard setback of at least twenty (20) feet, except as provided in BMC Section 20.44.020 (Traditional Front Yard Setbacks). SECTION 21. Section 20.84.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Limited Commercial Zone is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.84.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted: (a) Automobile service and repair, and car wash; (b) Co-location of wireless telecommunication facilities per BMC Section 20.46.140; (c) Day care facility, all; (d) Drive-through facility; (e) Finance, insurance and real estate; (f) Gas stations at the intersection of arterial roadways; (g) General office and business services; (h) General retail; (i) Hotel and lodging places, motels, and inns; G) Personal services; (k) Public administration; (1) Recycling collection station; (m) Residential as a secondary use; (n) Restaurant drinking place~ (0) Veterinarv Clinic. SECTION 22. Section 20.90.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Industrial Park Zone is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.90.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES The following uses are permitted outright: (a) Automobile service and repair; (b) Car wash; (c) Community facility; (d) Day care facility; 21 2007 Zoning Code Amendments ( e) Drive-through facility; (f) Entertainment uses; (g) Finance insurance and real estate; (h) Gas station; (i) General and large retail; U) General office and business services; (k) Kennel; (1) Light industrial/manufacturing; (m) Medical offices; (n) Nursery & greenhouse; (0) Outdoor athletic fields, and sports complex; (p) Outdoor storage; (q) Physical fitness & health clubs; (r) Public administration; (s) Recycling collection station; (t) Restaurants; (u) Schools & education uses; (v) Transportation facility; (w) Veterinary Clinic; fwt( x) Warehousing; W(y) Wireless telecommunications facilities per BMC Section 20.46.140; (yi(z) Worship and religious facility. SECTION 23.. Section 20.92.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Employment Center Zone is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.92.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted outright: (a) Co-location of wireless telecommunications facilities per BMC Section 20.46.140; (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) U) (k) (1) (m) (n) Community use facility; Day care facility, all; General office and business services; Finance insurance and real estate (no drive-through facilities); General retail; (no drive-through facilities); Hotels and lodging places; Medical offices; Outdoor athletic fields; Park playgrounds and open space; and parks; Personal service business; Physical fitness and health clubs; Public administration; Residential uses of the following types: (1) Group residential facility - Class I; 22 2007 Zoning Code Amendments (2) Multi-unit structure; (3) Nursing convalescent home; (4) Senior housing complex; (5) Single unit structure - attached or detached; (6) Townhouse. (0) Restaurants and drinking places; (no drive-through facilities); (p) Schools and education uses; (q) Transportation. facility; (r) Veterinary Clinic; m(s) Worship and religious facility. SECTION 24. Section 20.94.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Outright Permitted Uses" relating to the Industrial Zone is hereby amended to include Veterinary Clinic as an allowed use as follows: 20.94.020 OUTRIGHT PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted: (a) Automobile service and repair; (b) Car wash; ( c) Drive-through facility; (d) Gas station; (e) General office and business services over 5,000 gross sq. ft; (f) Heavy Industrial/Manufacturing; (g) Kennel; (h) Light Industrial/Manufacturing; (i) Nursery and greenhouse; (j) Outdoor storage; (k) Public administration; (1) Recycling collection station; (m) Outdoor athletic fields; (n) Stadiums and sports complex; (0) Transportation facility; (p) Veterinary Clinic; W( q) Warehousing; w(r) Wireless telecommunications facilities per BMC Section 20.46.140. SECTION 25. Severabilitv. If anyone or more sections, sub-sections, or sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 26. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. 23 2007 Zoning Code Amendments PASSED by the City Council the day of ,2007 WILL MAUPIN, Council President Approved this day of ,2007 CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: P AULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney ,2007 ,2007 PUBLISHED the EFFECTIVE the ORDINANCE NO. day of day of R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinances\Community Development\2007 Zoning Code amendments-I.doc 24 2007 Zoning Code Amendments Exhibit A FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON PLANNING COMMISSION Summary - Since the adoption of the new Zoning Code on November 30,2005 the need for several minor amendments have been identified through day to day use and application of the code. BMC chapter 20.18 "Text Amendments" directs staff to bring amendments that result in any substantive change of content or meaning to a public hearing by the Planning Commission and then City Council for review and adoption. Planning Commission conducted a hearing on February 20, 2007; decided further study was needed and therefore held a second public hearing on March 20, 2007. At the March 20, 2007 public hearing the commission made a recommendation to approve all seven amendments to the Zoning Code. Changes include modification to Accessory Dwelling Unit requirements, fencing height and permitting requirements, accessory structure development standards, and minor house keeping corrections in various chapters. I. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Project Description Minor modifications to several sections of the zoning code are. There are seven issues that require modification, these issues include the following: adding veterinary clinics as an allowed use in the commercial zones; modifying Accessory Dwelling Unit requirements for more flexibility, changing the fencing height requirement for front yards; clarifying accessory structure development standards, correcting clerical issues in the landscaping section, clarifying the density calculation and signage requirements in the R-1 0 zone; and correct inconsistent wording throughout the code. Planning Commission recommended all but two amendments to City Council at the February 20,2007 public hearing. The Commission determined that the amendments to accessory structures, both garages and Accessory Dwelling Units needed further study prior to a recommendation. The commission directed staff to provide graphic representation to better visualize the proposed changes. The Commission wanted to see how large of a structure the amendments would allow. The primary concern was that the proposed amendments would allow for garages and accessory structures that would not be compatible with existing neighborhoods. On March 20, 2007 the Planning Commission held a second public hearing to further discuss the two accessory structure amendments. Staff brought diagrams and examples of typical garages and Accessory Dwelling Unit sizes and showed renderings of lot size requirements to explain how the changes would affect existing neighborhoods. Based on the graphics the Planning Commission was satisfied with the proposed amendments to Accessory Dwelling Unit. The public hearing focused primarily on the garage I accessory structure amendments as staff brought forward revised amendment language that addressed concerns raised in the February hearing. Exhibit A The changes proposed in February would have allowed for an accessory structure to be as large as 60% of the principal unit or 1,000 square feet, which ever was greater. This would allow some smaller homes to have garages that exceeded the homes size. It also did not sufficiently limit the size of garages for large homes. The comprehensive plan goal CC1 H suggests as a general rule-of-thumb, an accessory structure should be of a lesser square footage and volume than the principal structure. The revisions proposed at the March 20, 2007 Public Hearing meet this goal by allowing accessory structures to be up to 80% the size of the principal unit with a cap of 1,200 total square feet. This will ensure that most small homes can have a two car garage and large homes cannot have an excessive amount of accessory structures (for reference an average two car garage is 400 square feet and the average six car garage is 1,200 square feet). The Planning Commission recommends the remaining two amendments be added to the previously recommended amendments in the February Public Hearing and sent forward to the City Council for approval. 2. Procedural History 2.1 February 6, 2007 sent CTED notification of pending Zoning Code amendments 2.2 February 10, 2007 Notice of Public Hearing 2.3 February 20,2007 Planning Commission Public Hearing 2.4 February 22,2007 Issuance of SEPA DNS 2.5 March 10, 2007 Notice of Public Hearing 2.6 March 20, 2007 Planning Commission Public Hearing 3. Public Comment 3.1 Individuals providing verbal testimony at Planning Commission public hearing: February 20. 2007: a. Andy Schoos, 534 Juniper Street March 20. 2007: a. Jordy Andrew, 1328 Hayward Avenue 4. SEPA Determination A Determination of Non-Significance was issued on February 22, 2007. No appeals were filed for this action. 5. Consistency Amendments to the Zoning Code Zoning Code text amendments shall meet the decision criteria outlined in BMC 20.18.020 (d). The Planning Commission may recommend, and the City Council may adopt or adopt with modifications, an amendment to the Zoning Code text if the criteria outlined below are met. 20.18.020 (d) (1) allows amendments to the Comprehensive Plan if it is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Exhibit A . The amendments are minor and continue to uphold the objectives and goals of Comprehensive Plan. These amendments do not change the intent or purpose of the zoning code. 20.18.020 allows amendments to the Comprehensive Plan if it does not conflict with other City, state and federal codes, regulations and ordinances. . The amendments to the Zoning Code do not conflict with any other regulations. II. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings above, Planning Commission concludes that The Zoning Code amendments meet the requirements in BMC 20.18.020, text amendments to the Zoning Code and therefore recommends the adoption of the amendments to the Zoning Code. Respectfully submitted by: Executive Secretary Approved by: John Cockburn, Chair DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM To: City Council From: Nicole Ward, City Planner Date: April 18, 2007 Subject: Minor Zoning Code Amendments SUMMARY Since the adoption of the new Zoning Code on November 30,,2005 the need for several minor amendments has been identified from the daily application of the code. BMC chapter 20.18 "Text Amendments" directs staff to bring amendments that result in any substantive change of content or meaning to a public hearing by the Planning Commission and then City Council for review and adoption. The Planning Commission conducted two public hearings, the first on February 20,2007 then another on March 20, 2007. Staff is brining forward the Commission's recommendation of 7 amendments for City Council's consideration. Changes include modification to Accessory Dwelling Unit requirements, fencing height and permitting requirements, accessory structure development standards, and minor house keeping corrections in various chapters. Following this memo in Attachment I is an amendment narrative which contains a summary of each of the proposed changes. OPTIONS . Adopt the changes as recommended by the Planning Commission in Attachment I . Adopt the Planning Commission's recommended changes to the Zoning Code with modifications. . Deny the Planning Commission's recommend changes to the Zoning Code. ATTACHMENTS . Attachment I - Narrative of Planning Commission recommended changes . Attachment II - Planning Commission meeting minutes Attachment I Staff Discussion of Proposed Zoning Code Amendments 1) Amendment to BMC 20.42 Definitions and several zones. Purpose: To allow for veterinary services with over night stay within the City. Although the code includes a definition of "Veterinary Clinic" it does not allow such services anywhere in the City. This should be corrected by adding veterinary clinics as an allowed uses in commercial zones. Veterinary services are discussed in the definition of "Medical Offices and Clinics" however this definition excludes overnight stay of patients. This is illogical because many veterinary procedures require overnight stay including spay and neuter. To simplify the code the definition of "Medical Offices" should be amended so the definition only applies to human medical services. Please review the following sections of the proposed ordinance for the specific code language: 3,10,12,14,15,17,18,19,21,22,23,&24 2) Amendment to BMC 20.46 Special Standards - Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) Purpose: To simplify ADU requirements and provide more.flexibility in what shape an ADU may take while maintaining the original intent to keep the primary residential unit as the obvious principal use. Proposed changes will no longer require an ADU to be attached to another structure and allow for slightly larger units. The definition of Accessory Dwelling Unit also needs modification to match the proposed changes in the text of the chapter. Please review the following sections of the proposed ordinance to see the specific changes: 3 & 4 3) Amendment to BMC 20.46 Special Standards - Fences Purpose: To change fence permit requirements so that not all fences will require a permit; to increase the minimum height of fences in the front yard from 3 to 4 feet; to include fence height limits in District and Neighborhood Centers, and to make exceptions for essential public facilities for fence height and materials. Also chapter 17 of the BMC . requires modification to no longer require fence permits for fences less than 6' in height. A few years ago the City determined that all fences over 2' in height needed a fence permit and amended this code section to include such language. To change it back this requirement must be removed. Please review the following sections of the proposed ordinance to see the specific changes: 2 & 5 Attachment I 4) Amendment to BMC 20.50 Landscaping Standards Purpose: To include minimum tree sizes for landscaping plans, these caliper requirements were in the old code and were inadvertently left out. Also to amend a typo which should have exempted very small parking lots from landscaping requirement, but as currently written does the opposite. Please review the following sections of the proposed ordinance to see the specific changes: 6 5) Amendment to BMC 20.60 R-IO - Garage Requirements Purpose: To simplify and clarify the garage requirements. The section has been difficult to implement and interpret as to what structures are being regulated and how to apply those regulations. These amendments will create more flexibility for garage and accessory structures while maintaining them as clearly accessory uses to the home. These amendments will affect both the Low Density Residential zone and the Multiple Residential zone as the same garage requirements are found in both. The Planning Commission had significant discussion relating to this amendment please review the Planning Commissions Findings and Conclusions and hearing minutes for specific discussion. Please review the following sections of the proposed ordinance to see the specific changes: 7 & 20 6) Amendment to BMC 20.60 R-IO - Density Calculation Purpose: Clarification was needed to specify that the actual lot boundary should be used not just the tax lot boundary. Several property owners have more than one lot, but for tax purposes combine them to get one tax statement. More accurate densities can be achieved by allowing the actual lot boundaries, not just the tax lot boundaries to be used. Please review the following sections of the proposed ordinance to see the specific changes: 8 7) Amendment to BMC 20.60 R-IO - Sign Standards Purpose: To clarify the location of signage requirements for home occupation businesses. Please review the following sections of the proposed ordinance to see the specific changes: 9 Attachment I 8) Amendment to Several Chapters - Development Standards. Purpose: To provide consistent wording throughout all the zoning code chapters relating to maximum development coverage. Some chapters have used the term "lot coverage" while the majority of the chapters use "development coverage". These terms mean the same thing and should be used consistently through the code. Please review the following sections of the proposed ordinance to see the specific changes: 7, 11, 13, & 16 Attachment II Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for: February 20, 2007 & March 20, 2007 DRAFT FOR APPROV AL ON 3/20/07 Minutes for City of Bremerton Planning Commission Regular Meeting February 20, 2007 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chairman Cockburn at 5:31 p.m. .. (< II. Roll Call IF 'tp Those present were: Chairman Cockburn, Commissiog~i-i t;ri~dberg-Ne 'i.IS?~issioner Hoell, Commissioner Kennedy, Commissioner Mosiman, anclI Commissioner Streissgulh. Commissioner Kosusko was excused. Quorum certified. \:. -r~>::, Also present: Andrea Spencer, Nicole Ward, and Pam Ranti~R/QDCDA~'t~ff), III. Sl::, Chairman Cockburn introduced the agenda. as presented. to approve the agenda -"S{.';:',:'., ,;!t;lV. ~':,:--'-::::-,: - ---. - - \::~~' App;~~~i of Minut~s T-"'~ +S} The minutes of thep>Re~ul<l,r Meeti. held on Jariu.~~;>16, 2007 were presented for approval by Commissioner Cockburn. ...1\; motioU ",as made b~:~Commissioner Kennedy and seconded by Commissioneri"'~~'~i~!.~sgutht~ aprove>!.ular Meeting Minutes of January 16, 2007, as presented. Cail1e~f(r' vote:~~issionfiedberg-Nerf: Yes; Commissioner Hoell: Abstain; Kenned Commls ioner Mosiman: Yes; Commissioner Streissguth: Yes; Chairman The moti ied. f;{-::, E}:::;:V VI. Public Meeting c',., A. ublic (pGblic comments on any item not on tonight's agenda). '"\;ti ).-g-' i~\~\/:// Commissioner~ockburn asked if there were any comments from citizens. Seeing none, he closed this portion of the meeting. B. Public Hearine: Nicole Ward, City Planner, presented eight proposed amendments to the zoning code. Chairman Cockburn opened the Public Hearing and asked if there were any comments from citizens. Andy Schoos, 534 Juniper Street, Bremerton: "Basically, I was here approximately eight, nine months ago talking about garage sizes. I'm kind of unprepared here but it looks like we're Planning Commission Meeting February 20, 2007 Page 1 of 4 DRAFT FOR APPROV AL ON 3/20/07 heading towards the right area. What was the proposal that's on the table looks very good; it looks like it'll [inaudible] a healthy enthusiast. You've seen what's been happening in downtown Bremerton with West Sound Bank and people supporting car activities downtown Bremerton; there's a lot of car people here as well as RVers and campers and stuff like that. I think that we're on the right track. It looks very good to me. It would fit me, it would fit a lot of people that I've talked to - the sizing that we have, that is being proposed, and basically, I'm all for it - I hope you guys are, too. Thanks." Chairman Cockburn asked if there were any further comments from the public. Seeing none, he closed this portion of the Public Hearing and moved on to commis,,~i9,n deliberations. ;.",/) --.":11 Commissioner Hoell asked staff for clarification on what a "com Iicated fence" was. This was explained as any fence that deviates from the code. Property.o would still be able to discuss fence requirements with staff and determine if a perm" s nee Ai.: Code Enforcement will continue to deal with fences that don't meet code req~i?;~ent:~. Engin~" g standards have to be met for fences on comer lots that might obstruct a dr' ~}':sl!pe of sight. ""'W Chairman Cockburn asked if the 25% heig9M!.BH~ase on A~cessory DwelliR~~~I1.itSWoUld still have a maximum height of 35 feet. Staff saidit~ould. ~t:;JY~s suggested tOi,lpd language to 920.46.01 0(f)(3) to clarify the maximum height limi . < 4 ""'t. Commissioner Mosiman wanted toKf'1?W why the require.m~gt for two off-street parking spaces had been struck from the section reg~F<li~~:>;'\ccessory Dwelli~~4~nit~.; Nicole explained that, by requiring two spaces instead of one,tt.~....'..'.wQ.u......'...I.....d..'.....:.....:....:;...~............l....l.:'......m..:...:........I."..t citizen'sao.....'.i.....l.........I......1Y......, to have an ADU on their property and felt that one required parklgg space~':\X(j1;llgbe suffiCi~nt. .,A{\ Commissioner M~~lrn~~,~cPressed cond~:~j[j156ut th~ihqT~~sed size of the garages and ADU s and what kind of)Ry"isualirn}J~ft that would)>~ave on a neighborhood. Nicole explained that in residential zo~e,s'itl1ere could.llpt be more thall;pO% lot coverage which includes all structures and impervious sutfac~~r n that lql~ '~::f.j.f """'T"" Comm~~sion~r Hoell a ought process behind changing the ADU requirements. Nico)~'H~spon that the~vious requI ents were too focused on size and were restrictive to tb~point that Cl etits..usually.<;Q"Uld not put an ADU on their property. ....j...;:.... .:;;;.ll.t:.\'i{.;~f.th\\; C~~!pissioner Fried~~rg-Nerfexpressed concern regarding the potential size of a garage or ADQ{1::1ttt~e house werei~'OOO square feet. Nicole reminded the commissioners that garages and Acce~~dhDwelling U~~ts are separate issues and have different maximum square footage. Andrea S .... cer, Dire.~~or of Community Development, stressed that stafPs view was to ease up on the sl~:s~e~~d'focus on the design of the garage and maximum lot coverage to make the code more citiier).jf~endly. Commissioner$treissguth noted that there were no design standards listed for Accessory Dwelling Units: Nicole referred to the proposed amendment to 920.46.01O(f) which states that the appearance of an ADD will be consistent with the primary dwelling. Chairman Cockburn wanted to know if it was more common in other jurisdictions to have a 60% size limitation or a 40% size limitation for Accessory Dwelling Units. Nicole said that typically other jurisdictions were not as restrictive as Bremerton and they use other calculation methods to determine maximum size, but most were compatible with the 60% maximum size. Planning Commission Meeting February 20,2007 Page 2 of 4 DRAFT FOR APPROY AL ON 3/20107 Commissioner Hoell wanted to know how the proposed amendments would affect the decision making process in Community Development during the permitting process. Staff felt the proposed amendments add clarification to the previous code. Chairman Cockburn expressed concern about garages that may "dwarf' the primary structure and be unsightly regardless of what the design standards are. Nicole explained that the requirement to have the garage use materials similar to the primary structure could, in itself, be a limiter for size as well as making the structure's overall appearance more consistent. Andrea suggested limiting garages to the height of the primary structure. Commissioners Hoell and Kennedy reminded the others that housing recreational vehicles part of the decision to allow a garage to be taller than the primary structure. ~"",:"" ,:',:,:"',~ Commissioner Friedberg-Nerf asked for clarification as "WQY the amendment proposed changing the word "lot" to "development" in S20.70.060. Nicole.said it was for consistency throughout the entire code. ..e:Z Commissioners Friedberg-Nerf and Streissg~~h!i;asked for additional la 811age to clarify the proposed amendment to S20.60.100, Sign Sta'!44rd!f to make,iJ easier to use',fi \,~ ,,::,<~.{ C Co"~ ",::",::~'-::_:<-- :":0, :'--i. ::'i;::. ,',:: r ,,---_.,---,.,- -.".".,...,--" Commissioner Mosiman expressed concern reg;fal~g~9~a~r~tion of S20.60.060(c)(ii) which included an increased setback for larger structures. NhiQI~.,x:~plied that the additional setback was difficult to implement and had littlei~.ffect on the overall aPH~~rance of the structure. ~~l Commissioner Streissguth suggeste<li~iabli~g e amendmen.lt~ garage requirements and having staff provide "real life" scenari'3~ to )) . lustrate th~proposed changes at the next Planning Commission meeting, and m~veJ~ ..' ':~girithe other amendments. Andrea reminded the comm!~~iwn~.F;of the propose~J',al1nexation~i;'9f areas that have very large lots and how a code that istobirestr;'pt!xe could potentially make future annexations more difficult. ',- ,-'.--,-.'.-' ---,-- ...., ,,,' "'-I~' . A motion wa~ m .;~t;~y COil!rissioner Kenn~ierand seconded by Commissioner Friedberg- Nerf to recommeri'ai,~~.~ ~.2:~Jn~fEo~e am~~aments 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8, as identified in Attac.h.................m..........,.."............................e.........!l....t..................I......... and ame..n......,.d.....e..........d,.foniCit.y...........'.,...............C.............,..,....o..,..................,.......".... ncil adoption. Called for a vote: Commissioner ;0>;',::,:::,::,,:::.::::,:'::"'''' -:-.:;. ", -," _ ''''.::..?'^ Frie.<loerg::Mt"\' es; CO~~!.ssioner Hoell:: Yes; Commissioner Kennedy: Yes; Commissioner .ty1osiman: Yes, issione treissguth: Yes; Chairman Cockburn: Yes. The motion carried. 'i,t\':\.., c!psed the\i"~blic Meeting. "j'i:i' .wm 'l;~ VI. Business Meeting ,<+ A. Chairman's Report: i~None. -..;,-- B. <~:'.-~/ w:?i:~::\'>-- Director's RevdH: Andrea Spencer, Director of Community Development, reported that Art Castle from tliie Homebuilders Association will be giving a presentation on Low Impact Development at the March meeting. Annexations of Nary Yard City and West Hills will commence at the February 21, 2007, City Council meeting. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) has implemented a neighborhood enhancement program. Planning Commission Meeting February 20, 2007 Page 3 of 4 DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 3/20107 If the City of Bremerton annexed the South Kitsap Industrial Area (SKIA) it would realize approximately $50,000.00 per year in taxes without NASCAR and approximately $450,000.00 per year in taxes with NASCAR. This does not include additional businesses such as restaurants or retail. Annexation cannot happen without approval from the Port of Bremerton. Staffing: GeoffWentlandt, Planner I, has been promoted to Planner II; Janet Lunceford has been promoted to Code Enforcement Officer; Pam Ransier has been promoted to Office Assistant Senior Specialist. Three additional positions are still open. A new condominium project is proposed for 600 Washington & Challenges to the Andrea will be giving a presentation on Growth Management - League of Women Voters on February 21,2007. /#\7 ~: "',-;;-.~" Interviews have been conducted for a consultant for..~~:B9wntown ional Center Sub-area Plan. VIA Architecture out of Vancouver, BC,~#s";Be~n "chosen to~r~ with the City of Bremerton on this project. It's hoped to have a preliminary draft plan aV8cHflble by September 2007. . '~ Commissioner Friedberg-Nerf asked for an upda'i7:!~~jlWhe~ton Way/Riddell sub-area plan. Andrea said the process has been delayed for a couple'~"nths due to the development company working on this project.i'Gi. C. Old Business: Commissioner Fried~~f~!w>" suggested hav1I1gthe'Planning Commission look for opportunities to work with Public \\ror oifl ing projyCts. Y':\ l' D. New Business: M3~~e~)gp>~opies of the1>~~W1ing Coml}}!~slOn bylaws were distributed in the meeting pacKet for:theicommissioneisto review and make comments or changes. No action is re,q~if~d at thistime.iii,., Respeqt!i ',t?;;,;':!:;.<4t,.,., :~_:,,:,-,:~'i/ Adjo~til~ent e next R~gul'iir Meeting is scheduled for March 20,2007. Approved by: John Cockburn, Chairman Planning Commission Meeting February 20, 2007 Page 4 of 4 DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 4/17/07 Minutes for City of Bremerton Planning Commission Regular Meeting March 20, 2007 I. Call to Order II. Roll Call ommlsslOner Hoell, Commissioner The meeting was called to order by Chairman Cockburn at 5:32 p.m. Those present were: Chairman Cockburn, CommissionfrnFrifdberg-Ner )".,\'r" --_._c_, _,~ Commissioner Kennedy, Commissioner Kosusko, Cgrnmissioner Mosiman; Streissguth. Quorum certified. III. RY general cortsensus to approve the agenda Also present: Andrea Spencer, Nicole Ward, and Pam Ransi~{y Chairman Cockburn introduced the agenda. as presented. ~',-- ,,;::;; \;~~h, The minutes of the0Jl'eg~1~r MeetIp held on Feb~'l,D! 20, 2007 were presented for approval by Commissioner Cockburn.'{~.moti?g.I\:~~~made b~;ii(::ommissioner Kennedy and seconded by Commissioner..~.t.~eissguth . t~approve!1t.~~~.~!!.I~r Meeting Minutes of February 20, 2007, as revised'..~':l'Hedf~;:;>'.~.::".vote:),,~g~missioner)Friedberg-Nerf: Yes; Commissioner Hoell: Yes; Commis~!i~rih Kennedyl:x:.~s; Co~tssioner Kosusko: Abstain; Commissioner Mosiman: Yes; Comfi}!s '(mer Streissguth: :::X:~;~; Chaih1)'lpJ:Qpckburn: Yes. The motion carried. "<'::'-'i'+ !~:<<s VI. Public Meeting <-'-'-:!rtGtL '- :;. .._,_.t._ Commissioner";I:!:r~kburn asked if there were any comments from citizens. Seeing none, he closed this portion of the meeting. ;ublic (pd6lic comments on any item not on tonight's agenda). A. B. Guest Speaker: Art Castle, Home Builders Association gave a Power Point presentation on Low Impact Development. He reviewed the history of Low Impact Development in Kitsap County and outlined the science and benefits of it. He showed examples of neighborhoods currently incorporating LID standards in their design. Handouts of this presentation are located in the Planning Commission meeting file. Planning Commission Meeting March 20, 2007 Page 1 of 4 DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 4/17/07 C. Public Hearin1!: 1. Reconsideration of Amendment 8. Nicole Ward, City Planner, presented for revision Amendment 8 of the Zoning Code 920.60.060 and 920.70.060 that was approved by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2007 meeting. The revision would replace the term "lot coverage" with "development coverage" for consistency throughout the chapters. Chairman Cockburn opened the Public Hearing and asked if there were any comments from citizens. Seeing none, he closed this portion of the meeting. A motion was made by Commissioner Kosusko and seconded by..~?mmissioner Streissguth to reconsider Amendment 8 from the February 20, 2007 ~!annihg Commission Public Hearing to include revisions to both the District Cente . ore arid R-IO development standards to maintain consistent language throughout t~>,'~~ code. Called for a vote: Commissioner Friedberg- Nerf: Yes; Commissioner HoeIJ,I:",Y es; ''@Q~issioner Kennedy: Yes; Commissioner Kosusko: Yes; Commissioner Y~s; Commts~ismer Streissguth: Yes; Chairman Cockburn: Yes. The motion carried.' 2. Minor Amendments to the Zonin Code Regarding GarageH~/(Accessory Dwelling Units. Nicole Ward, City Planri'ei:; .the st~f:fJeport on revisiory~'to the Zoning Code amendments regarding garages and Accesso ellifi~\Units that had been presented to the commission on February 20, 2007. She showe0~:nples of what had been previously allowed, what was proposed for th,~.8.~rrent code, and h():iifhe proposed amendments comply with the Comprehensive Plan. Sli~('~ls.g,jj,~,~cluded a cIYclrt:til~~strafing garage sizes for each scenario. She reminded the commiss.~,?ner.~;t,9,~t.the calculatio~for development included the square footage of all accessory structur~~ on ilie"lof\..tj~is total~,quare footage could not exceed 80% of the square footage of the primarystructure'~~fe~.s.?d; Dwelling Unit square footage is calculated separately bqt.il1qluded in total (I~y~16pmentco~~~age. -/'_:,:' "'. :':'_".,.:,::,"",,' \4t~\):::. ,.':"",,;. <;i';' ,,:::, Commissioner.~oell aske if the change,~",in building height calculations for garages in 920.60.060(d)(iii}'\y<?uld co y with overall~~~.ilding heights within the zone. Nicole said it would; the standardspecifie the structure Qould not be greater than thirty-five feet tall. &/ C~"!tlii~si6n.~.~;),.~gsusk;...g~ested incuding a minimum structure size in the development .M~ndards to enslir~'.i'if~at some~R,e wifh a house under 500 square feet could build a two-car ).garage. Andrea SR~' cer, Dire.c..........t......o. t.c.).of Community Development, explained that the proposed ":,::::;-s.'._",-:.-'/-(:-:":._ .,>::::. ' ' 'ae.~~~g,pment standard..ere forJ.~ll accessory structures, not just garages, and did not want to ina{lyert~ntly force so:n.~gne to Buil{l a larger out-building, like a garden shed, than was wanted. She sug~~?ted having t~~. commission direct staff to look at options that would allow someone with a ve' all houseito have a two-car garage rather than make another amendment. Chairman Coc...;;~..n opened the Public Hearing and aske{l if there were any comments from citizens. Seeingp'one, he closed this portion of the meeting. Jordy Andrew, 1328 Hayward Avenue: "Looking at the minutes here - I didn't plan on asking any questions - but, the setback issue that was - there was a question asked about that, I guess at the last meeting, that part of this was to eliminate the additional setbacks for larger structures. Am I understanding that correctly? That - I'm not familiar with what those were but you're basically proposing that those be eliminated completely? Or the a{l{litional setbacks be [inaudible] understanding that?" Planning Commission Meeting March 20, 2007 Page 2 of 4 DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 4/17/07 Nicole said yes, and explained that the additional setbacks applied only to structures that were over 1,500 square feet in size, and that with this code amendment the largest detached garage size would be 1,200 square feet thereby making the additional setback unnecessary. Chairman Cockburn asked if there were any further comments from citizens. Seeing none, he closed this portion of the meeting. Commissioner Friedberg-Nerf asked to substitute the word "structure" for "storage buildings" in Amendment 2. Staff explained that that was a description of the amendment and not the chapter amendment. :.1';':,=>. Commissioner Friedberg-Nerf noted that the structures liste~jl1s:920.60:060(c) did not include all of the structures listed in 920.60.030 and thought th<lt,":tH:~:iH"~ts should be identical for consistency. Andrea explained that the language "but are.;:~~t lim'ited~Q;;: would include all types of accessory structures even if they are not specificaH~~is~~d. Staff:if~jll compare the sections before presenting the amendments to Council to ens,~econ~}stency. ox Commissioner Friedberg-Nerf asked if th~:~~~~~trement in 920.460 I O(t)fdfI!:~j.m:iJa:r materials and siding would include color and design.o;':Aftet!!some distusion, the commiss'ioners decided the proposed language was sufficient. A motion was made by Commissi~g~..~. Streissguth and ~S():~ded by Commissioner Kennedy to recommend Zoning Code Ameqd.,......lJl~pts 1 and 2 as .id~~!i{ied!.n attachment V for City Council adoption with instruction t~::.~tit(~:[i~:().:r~~amine the"pi~~~!Dility of larger garages for very small houses. Called for a vot~::; c6ri1rl11~~jQ~:r Frie~gerg-Nerf: Yes; Commissioner Hoell: Yes; Commissioner Kennedy::;*::es;(:::follli!1i~~.~QH~rkosusko: Yes; Commissioner Mosiman: Yes; Streissgutlfi:ii.Y6s; ChairrnariCockbum: Yes. The motion carried. ~:,:',-",,: <,: -:,,", Chairman '.Meeting A. ,:_:::',\'::(:,:?i:r,::,:,2R;~ C~~iriD~nfsI!ep()~t:~t~~n nl reported on the Non-motorized Transportation Plan 21~eting. FourPI.<lg~~pg Collli!1i~~ioners attended. He noted the consultants from Portland were :t~rrific and they lia:a~~ttogeth~:t:~::great meeting. He feels Bremerton will end up with a great w pl~.rld was impress~~:~ith the. aCtive participation of citizens. There will be more meetings on this t9pic with a plan to!nresent to the Planning Commission in September 2007. B. C<{:~\15:_>,:} zj~0'~; Directot:'~<~~.~ort: 1:pdrea Spencer, Director of Community Development, reported that there will be;;t~:final":J.?ublic Hearing on the West Hills Annexation at the next City Council meeting on Mar'9liit71; 2007. It's anticipated City Council will adopt an ordinance that will start a 45-day recall petiad which could result in a petition asking for a public vote on the annexation. Andrea reviewed the costs and revenues, both current and future, of annexing that area. The City is in the process of developing an ordinance that will allow newly annexed areas to continue to have livestock and no garbage service; that exemption would be discontinued once the property changed ownership or if it becomes a code enforcement issue. A Comprehensive Plan amendment for interim zoning control is proposed to limit industrial development and to maintain the single-family character of that area. Community Development recently negotiated a scope of work with VIA Architecture who has been retained as the consultant for the Downtown Regional Center's sub-area plan. Andrea expects to present this ontion to City Council for the study session on March 28, 2007 and action Planning Commission Meeting March 20, 2007 Page 3 of 4 " DRAFT FOR APPROVAL ON 4/17/07 on April 4, 2007. Stakeholder meetings should begin on April 5, 2007 with community outreach meetings shortly thereafter. Updated bylaws will be presented at the April meeting. C. Old Business: None. D. New Business: None. Andrea Spencer, Executive Secretary VII. Adjournment Meeting was adjourned at 6:58 p.m. The next Regular Meeting is Respectfully submitted by: Approved by: John Cockburn, Chairman Planning Commission Meeting March 20, 2007 Page 4 of 4 't Accessory Structure Comparison (All units are in square feet) Average 2 car garage is 400 Average 6 car garage is 1,200 House Size Current Code Proposed Code 500sf + 10% of house Accessory Structure 80% of house size not to exceed 1,200sf 500 550 Max 400 1,000 600 Max 800 1,500 650 Max 1 ,200 2,000 700 Max 1 ,200 3,000 800 Max 1,200 7,000 1,200 Max 1 ,200 _...'~ .,...t',.~ I.......... L CD 0 C) 0 0) C "'0 .- 0 CO ....... ~ i lo- m X ... CO () 0 ... N C!) ... to CO ~ Q) 0) ,CO ~ ~ '-./ CO k uO- .oz .I CD ~ co () +-' CD Q) ~ C\J Q) ~ cu :J 0- en 0 0 """ :J o <( ..c +-' ..- ~ Q) C) CO !... CO C) ~ CO () C\I " I~~ lUO"~ ~. ~~ ~~.~~. ~' ". ,-".-" E r d; I ()~ ~ o o ~ ..c () ~ Q) C o -I-' Q) Q) '+- Q) ~ ~ ::::J 0- en o o Q) Q) C) co ~ co (!J '!l!i!!!J fl!iii!!i 01 ,\ 0: (I): : ~.'- ,W : ~"b !~$~ iU)!t!X : ~- ""..,. ()- . ........' I. .. .......... ...'. .' I ..' ~\ I _::cO" I , ..... (b j H :rt\~ ! I I I f~' "'e'~ ~, ="1li L......J nO-,he ~ CO () (V) '. +-' (]) (]) '+- (]) ~ CO ::J 0- 00 o C\J ~ , 3 Car Garage with ADU Br1 10-3x12-8 I I I Family 12-5x16-4 rL~:::::] :;.-------------- 'I I-=_-::.=_=~-=--=-==-=~ 1 ,000 square feet each floor " Br2 12-3)(1 ()"3 IWVWIIWWII\ i. Dn~H I r Breakfast 11-4x7-8 Q ~1 I I .~ '9 ~ Garage 23-0x31-0 I I >------ 31'-4" 1--1 Storage 7-4>:12-4 t-i \!J~- Z~ :Jill -:t Ul O~ :to 'l1-- ::J:1l <o'~ ~~~.. tid~ I '<t;; ~\!JJ t.: Q) C) rn ~ rn ~ I ~5!.tNV"d'~ V~_. ,-'" -- .. '-....- - ~------~- 1I00,OV -- '- rn o CD tflP r;;? ~. ., ~ ~- ~~ GS?C ~~~ .. wi . .- --~ \. I~ _ -~1\. I I I I 1- 'Iiiiiir .... I~- () I 8 . I - I I () I I CC\ I I I I 1- - J , ......., Q) Q) ~ (]) ~ CO ::J 0- 00 o o C\J ,...... cH. !lJuwain d1:1c23'CiJe 1337 1!owe'C dl1mine !lJ'tiue 23'Cemnton. CWaj.hin9ton 98312 April 16 , 2007 Will Maulpin President, Bremerton City Council 4610 Marine View Place Bremerton, Washington 9/~8312 Dear Will, We are writing to ask you to vote for the recommendation from the planning department to increase the size of an accessory dwelling on a residential lot from 800sq. Ft. to 1000sq. Ft. We believe that this if in keeping with the guidelines of urban density planned for Bremerton and is good use of city lots. On a personal note we know of caseS where this type of dwelling is planned for the use of aging parents who can be close to help when needed but still independent. This also helps to meet an increasing need in our society. / '/ (., ., G Virginia McBride /li,.."oj/ , "';'. .:.-....) //7 -1, A I . f I I' ""'2/ j."".. 0- (E' \,J j' ,t./(.,.,-'"-" '/'" .... j- r .' .j Duey (H. Duwain) McBride 1337 Lower Marine Dr. Bremerton Wa. 98312 360 479-2559