HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/21/2007 AGENDA
~
IY
FI LE
@O\l\1 @(J
__~@NJ
CITY COUNCIL 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton, WA 98337-1873 D (360) 473-5280
MARCH 21, 2007
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
1. PRE-COUNCIL STUDY SESSION: 5:00 - 5:30 P.M. in COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM 603
A. General Council Business
2. CALL TO ORDER: 5:30 P.M. in CHAMBERS lOCATED ON FIRST FLOOR
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation
3. MAYOR'S REPORT
4. PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS
5. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Claims & Check Register (#AB07-054)
B. Minutes of Meeting - March 7, 2007 (#AB07-055)
, - ~""J.:t ' . .. ., . '. .
C. Minutes of Meeting - March 14,2007 (#AB07-056)
D. Purchase of Fire Department Command Vehicle (#AB07-057)
E. Purchase of two Replacement Vehicles (#AB07-058)
F. Extension of Gold Mountain Golf Complex Professional Services Agreement (#AB07-059)
G. Resolution No. 3027 authorizing Financial Services Director and Finance Officer to designate
certain expenditures for potential reimbursement from debt proceeds (#AB07-060)
H. Interlocal Agreement for Legal Services relating to the Phase II National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Appeal (#AB07-061)
I. Authorization to add a permanent part-time Legal Assistant (#AB07-062)
J. Ordinance No. 5001, amending Chapter 3.64 of the Bremerton Municipal Code; creating
Chapter 2.36 of the Bremerton Municipal Code; and repealing Resolution Nos. 2666 and No.
2772, all relating to lodging taxes (#AB07-063)
K. Reappointments of Silvia Klatman, Ruth Enderle, Corky Trent, and David Tufts to the Lodging
Tax Advisory Committee (#AB07-064)
6. GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Interlocal Agreement between SOUTH KITSAP FIRE & RESCUE regarding exchange of first
response fire protection and EMS Services (#AB07-065)
B. Real Estate Purchase & Sale Agreement with MCCORMICK LAND COMPANY (#AB07-066)
C. Ordinance No. 5000 amending Chapter 6.04 of the Bremerton Municipal Code regarding
garbage collection; Chapter 7.05 of the Bremerton Municipal Code regarding livestock in
newly annexed areas (#AB07-067)
CONTINUED ON BACK...
rI Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations
should contact the City Clerk's Office at (360) 473-5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Council meeting.
..
7. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Public Hearing regarding Ordinance No. 5002 approving Annexation of the West Hills Island
of unincorporated territory to the City of Bremerton, establishing Interim Zoning Controls, and
establishing City Council Districts (#AB07-068)
8. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
9. ADJOURNMENT OF CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING
II Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations provided upon request. Those requiring special accommodations
should contact the City Clerk's Office at (360) 473-5323 by noon on the Monday preceding the Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SPEAKERS LIST
PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION FROM THE CITY OF
BREMERTON MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING.
THANK YOU.
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME BELOW IF YOU PLAN TO
SPEAK DURING THE COUNCIL MEETING TONIGHT
to
c
~ L-nt tl A/
S .s
EO
B",
P ~C[4 (~ l(ciLz/~
c~
MJ-r-714-- 6 ~-<- ~/&J~h S\
ffiA\ Ol!\ \~ . <'- Gr-R rIll 0 \)Dro~' (
((
9<?31
qg>J/~
106;;Z Sc n 7'{)
)yj / H#j:jtJ(f/ W 6e 9t3 fd,
306 ~ C~ 10 'ife-- AV€- CJ f3S J~
Jo/7 /? c T Lor II s-:s FArrvleY At; IV r-;/
11/;~/'!/fJn r dt-(I/~ &f[~CJ 1~1~/.P;U/ d~. '7?3/.2-. ,I /)&,f-
~'/f( /)c l / flf r!. b p /1/,Lj / L -tIz-(;; {~~ :l j ~ --e.c1V'2--1 - uu}--u r #/J J7fJ4fI CJ-cP<K vy.
N e., ; / A / /.e n I 0 ~ 5. 5 'tLV) V) Y h~ l( RJ 13 r eM. Wq q <b 312-
DATE SUBMITTED:
BILL # ()7 ---{) s:y
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SA
........a.D.....m.......aa.m..........aDD.................ED.....a.............a.ma..a..
SUBJECT:
Claim & Checks Register Approval
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
3 -c?(- 0 '7
Financial Services
Cathy Johnson
SUMMARY:
ATTACHMENTS:
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROVALS:
DEP ARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
I CONSENT AGENDA ISI I
, FISCA[/BUDGLT.
OPEPv^,.TIONS. - ~
COUNCILPRESIDENT. /t4-;/P71~ /?
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve:
1) Check#'s yS-:/713 -3/<;"~~
EFT's ?(Y 0 - /O-:<:S
$ 33cr;~3f: 9?
2) Regular Payroll for
$
3) Retiree Payroll for
$
COUNCIL ACTION: ~prove
D Deny
D Table
D Continue D No Action
DATE SUBMITTED:
BILL # b 7 -- {) 5S~
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
58
..amaa..mDUG.DB.U.g..........a..a......................a....a.sg.......aa....a.......mDI
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
for meeting of
/14/ vt, 71;). DO 7
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
N/A
il1cirr/h if! ;).6C 7
City Council I
Will Maupin,
Council President
(360) 473-5280
Phone:
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting held /1dYC41 7 d. bC> 7
r
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes for /114 It//, 7/ dO 07
FISCAL IMP ACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/ A
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
Council President
N/A
N/A
N/A
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
N2
4(-~4(?~~
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: n Approve n Denv n Table
n Continlle n No Adion
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Chambers, of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER 345 6th Street, Bremerton, Washington,
Wednesday, March 7, 2007, at 5:30 PM, with Council President Will Maupin presiding. Council
members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Wendy Priest, Adam Brockus,
Cecil McConnell, and Brad Gehring. Council Member Mike Shepherd was absent. Also present were
City Attorney Roger Lubovich; City Clerk Paula Johnston and Legislative Assistant Lori Smith.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Brad Gehrinq followed by the invocation
provided by Reverend Elizabeth Stevens of Kitsap Unitarian Universalist Fellowship.
President Maupin announced that a Pre-Council Session to discuss General Council Business was
held prior to the meeting.
MAYOR'S REPORT
· Phil Williams was invited to say a few words on behalf of Jeremy Loqan, from the Electronics
Division of the Public Works Department as he was presented the Mayor's Employee
Appreciation Award for the Month of March;
· Naval Avenue Elementary School will be hosting an Open House at the new sight of the Boys &
Girls Club Monday on March 26 at 5:00 PM Bremerton, which will include tours of the facility and
refreshments;
· Urged support of the Neighborhood Enhancement Program, and thanked staff for their efforts;
· Announced the public Grand Opening of the Harborside Fountain Park will be on Saturday, May 5
from 1 0:00 AM to 5:00 PM; and it was noted that a private ceremony will be held Friday, May 4 at
4:00 PM for the contractors and elected officials;
· Addressed comments regarding the recent property tax increase, and thanked the Port of
Bremerton for the work on the Bremerton Marina; and
· The "Free Wi Fi Zone" will be launched next Wednesday at 1 :00 PM, and thanked Bill Eley.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS
Gordy Byrd cautioned the public to be aware of a gentleman who is falsely claiming to collect money
on behalf of "Gordy's Bird House" fund because he is not authorized to do so.
Mike Walton, Marketing Director with the YMCA, provided an update on the current activities at the
"Y", and noted that further information can be obtained from their website at
www.kitsapfamilvvmca.orq.
Bob Field representing the American Legion was here to talk about "Boys State" and "Girls State"
which are national youth programs to encourage citizenship, and for additional information he can be
reached at (360) 620-8779 or Americanism@leqion.wa.orq.
Lori Oberlander with Habitat for Humanity, provided an update on the New Hope Final Plat and
Planned Unit Development; asked for interested volunteers; noted that three units are still available;
and provided their website at www.habitatforhumanitV.orq if additional information is needed.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Check Numbers 315158 through 315280; and EFT-7001 through EFT-7003 in the amount of
$1,002,840.57 for the period ending February 28, 2007 (#AB07 -041)
B. Minutes of Meeting - February 21, 2007 (#AB07 -042)
C. Minutes of Meeting - February 28,2007 (#AB07-043)
D. Budget Adjustment for the Purchase of Storage and Equipment at the New Police Building
(#AB07 -044)
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Page 2 of 4
E. Purchase of Dry-Pit Submersible Flygt Pumps from WHITNEY EQUIPMENT (#AB07-045)
F. Professional Services Agreement with MERCHANT PATROL for Security Services (#AB07-046)
G. Pre-Purchase of a 1.5 megawatt generator for the Wastewater Treatment Plant (#AB07-047)
H. Conveyance of 3,550 square feet of City property to the United States of America for Naval
Station Security Improvements (#AB07-048)
I. Resolution No. 3024, approving the New Hope Final Plat and Planned Unit Development for 18
units, File BP06-00190 (#AB07-049)
Lori Oberlander with Habitat for Humanity, thanked City staff for their help through the PUD process,
and thanked the Council for their support.
05:58:30 M/S/C/U (PriesUArends) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented.
GENERAL BUSINESS
6A - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT AND CONTRACT WITH CONSERVATION TECHNIX FOR PARK
PLAN UPDATE (#AB07-050): Wvn Birkenthal, Parks & Recreation Director, stated that in
December of 2006, the Parks Department widely advertised a Request for Qualifications to assist the
City with the update of the Parks & Recreation Plan. In January, a panel consisting of a Parks &
Recreation Board member, the Parks Director, Director of Community Development, and Parks
Maintenance Manager interviewed the top three firms. There was unanimous concurrence among
the panelists that CONSERVATION TECHNIX of Portland, Oregon was the firm most prepared to meet
Bremerton's need to update the Long Range Plan. After completing reference checks, staff
negotiated a scope of work and price (inclusive of travel) of $61,610.00 for the plan update. The
update of the Park Plan maintains the City's eligibility for State Grants to develop and acquire park
land. In 2006 the City received $2.8 million dollars of State Grant funds. The development of a Park
Plan is one of several tasks identified to be completed in 2007 to support the City's strategic
Priorities.
Helen Miller asked why the City was outsourcing this contract. Mr. Birkenthal said that in actuality,
this was a "hybrid" plan, and Parks staff were going to do a lot of work on the plan and would be
working with the consultants to minimize the costs. He added that it is a benefit to work with a
consultant because they are a "neutral party", and it is beneficial to see how Bremerton's Park
facilities and services "stack up" to national standards and other communities of similar size.
Mr. McConnell further explained that the City was outsourcing the planning is because the main
priority for the Parks Director is to manage the park system. Mr. Brockus encouraged supporters of
the proposed neighborhood park at 1 ih & lronsides to go to one of the three public meetings.
06:03:45 M/S/C/U (Brockus/Robinson) Move to approve a contract with CONSERVATION TECHNIX to
update the Long Range Park Plan; and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the contract in
substantially the same form as presented, and authorize the required budget adjustment in the
amount of $61,610.00 to fund this work.
6B - RESOLUTION NO. 3025, ADOPTING THE BREMERTON NEIGHBORHOOD ENHANCEMENT
PROGRAM (#AB07-051): Marie Vila, Community Development Block Grant and HOME Program,
explained that the Neighborhood Enhancement Program will provide small matching grants to
community groups seeking to make physical improvements in their neighborhoods. Through these
grassroots projects the City aims to trigger community-mindedness and pride that will make a positive
difference to the City as a whole. A POWER POINT presentation was made to further describe the
highlights of the Program.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Page 3 of 4
Mike Eliason with the Kitsap County Realtors Association urged the Council's support.
Council Members provided comments in support of this Program, and thanked Marie and staff for
their efforts in putting this together.
06:21:23 M/S/C/U (Priest/Brockus) Move to pass Resolution No. 3025 to adopt the Bremerton
Neighborhood Enhancement Program.
6C - RESOLUTION NO. 3026, RATIFYING THE KITSAP COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES AS
APPROVED BY THE KITSAP REGIONAL COORDINATING COUNCIL (#AB07-052l: Andrea
Spencer, Community Development Director, summarized that the Kitsap Countywide Planning
Policies (CPP's) are a regional framework prepared by local governments to coordinate jurisdictional
growth planning as directed by the State Growth Management Act. The CPP's were originally
adopted and ratified by all Kitsap County local governments in 1992 and have subsequently been
amended in 2000, 2001, 2003, and 2004. The proposed 2007 amendments address such items as
reasonable measures and the creation of land utilization and monitoring program. These
amendments were unanimously recommended by the KRCC Board on December 5, 2006 and
adopted by the Kitsap Board of County Commissioners on February 12, 2007. City Council
ratification of the amendments is requested to be compliant with the procedures outlined in the
CPP's. A POWER POINT presentation was made to highlight the amendments and discuss the
process. Mary McClure, Executive Director of the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, commented
that the CPP's have been evolving since early 2000, and the KRCC Board has been working with the
Planning Directors from throughout the County to amend and make them reflect the best case
relationships with the county, cities, and tribes, but it isn't perfect. She acknowledged that the item
the Council was most concerned about was also the most controversial of all the amendments that
were brought forward. Ms. McClure established that her intent was to facilitate the process to get to
a place where the parties can agree, and offered to answer any questions.
Paula Johnston, City Clerk, read proposed Resolution No. 3026 in its entirety into the record.
There were no comments from the public.
Council Members provided comments to establish their reasons for denying ratification of the Kitsap
Countywide Planning Policies, particularly due to the proposed amendment to change the word "shall"
to "should" in the RCW Section of the "Urban Growth Areas" that states "each County shall include
designations of urban growth areas in its Comprehensive Plan': because it would make it too easy to
ignore the requirement.
06:42:15 M/S/C/U (Wofford/McConnell) Move to pass Resolution No. 3026, rejecting the
amendments to the Kitsap Countywide Planning Policies, hereby denying ratification.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Adam Brockus announced the Washington State Ferries is looking for citizen volunteers to serve on
the Ferry Advisory Committee to call the office of County Commissioner Josh Brown.
Carol Arends mentioned that she is a graduate of "Girls State" from many years ago and
remembered it was a great experience, therefore highly recommended that anyone attend if they
have the opportunity.
Will Maupin reported on the recent KRCC Policy Board Meeting, which included discussions on
current issues of the Washington State Ferries, including lack of funding.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Page 4 of 4
With no further business, President Maupin adjourned the Council Meeting at 6:45 PM.
~;
LORI SMITH
Legislative Assistant
Attest:
PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WM:PJ:ls:cg
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMER TON
CITY COUNCIL
BILL # 01- oS"~
Sc,
DATE SUBMITTED:
.......................................................a................................
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
for meeting of
t1 () rvl.1 (tJ ( :J.. 00 7
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
N/A
I'1tArLh ~f d-O'!::l{
City Council I
Will Maupin,
Council President
(360) 473-5280
Phone:
SUMMARY: Attached is a summary of the City Council Meeting held 11 a rd" / 'I, ;:l 007
ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Minutes for M a..rc.-(,... 1'1, J-oCI
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): N/A
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
Council President
N/A
N/A
N/A
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
N~
At't!M'lc7~
CONSENT AGENDA [B"
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
DIGITAL RECORDING
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, March 14,2007
The weekly meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City
Council Chambers, of the NORM DICKS GOVERNMENT CENTER 345 6th Street, Bremerton, Washington,
Wednesday, March 14, 2007, at 5:30 PM, with Council President Will Maupin presiding. Council
members present were Nick Wofford, Carol Arends, Dianne Robinson, Mike Shepherd, Wendy
Priest, Adam Brockus, Cecil McConnell, and Brad Gehring. Also present were City Attorney Roger
Lubovich; and Council Assistant Christine Grenier.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Brad Gehrina followed by the invocation
provided by Council Member Mike Shepherd.
President Maupin announced that a Pre-Council Session was held at 5:00 PM in the Council
Conference Room to discuss General Council Business.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION & ANNOUNCEMENTS
On behalf of the Mayor and the City of Bremerton, President Maupin presented a proclamation to
proclaim Friday, March 30, 2007 as Washington State Science & Engineering Fair Day; which
was accepted by Lois Jane Luaq, President of the Washington State Science & Engineering Fair.
Ms. Luaa thanked the City for their support, and announced that the Fair would be held the weekend
of Friday, March 30 and Saturday, March 31 at Olympic College located at 13th & Chester Avenue in
Bremerton; and awards ceremony is planned for 6:00 PM that Saturday night.
Cecil McConnell invited the public to the 16th Annual Main Stream Association's Saint Patrick's Day
Parade to be held on Saturday, March 17'h bepinning at 11 :00 AM. The parade route will start from 6th
Street and Pacific Avenue, then proceed to 1s Street to Washington Avenue, and end at the
Harborside Fountain.
Adam Brockus announced the next District 3 Community Meeting would be held on Tuesday, March
27, 2007 from 7:00 to 8:30 PM at the Manette Senior Center located at E. 13th Street & Nipsic Avenue
and the speaker will be Kitsap Transit Director Dick Hayes who will be available to discuss bus
service.
Mike Shepherd encouraged people to attend the Water Festival to be held Thursday, March 22 at
Olympic College and added that representatives from Kitsap Trees would be hosting an exhibit.
Dianne Robinson will be part of a judging panel for the Regional State History Contest on Monday,
March 19th in the Olympic College Student Lounge.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Check Numbers 315281 through 315442; and EFT-7004 through EFT-7015 in the amount of
$1,358,314.51 for the period ending; and Regular Payroll in the amount of $620,761.75 for the
pay period ending February 28,2007 (#AB07-053)
There were no comments from the public.
05:40:18 M/S/C/U (Priest/Arends) Move to approve the CONSENT AGENDA as presented.
President Maupin asked the Council Members to reconvene in the Council Conference Room for a
STUDY SESSION to hear presentations on upcoming agenda items. With no further business, the
Council Meeting was adjourned at 5:41 PM.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
Wednesday, March 14,2007
Page 2 of 2
Prepared and Submitted by:
Attest:
PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
WILL MAUPIN, City Council President
WM:PJ:ls:cg
~:~~
CHRISTINE GRENIER '
Council Assistant
DATE SUBMITTED: OJ-07-()7
BILL # 01- 051
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
5D
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Purchase Fire Department
Command Vehicle
Committee Meeting Date: 03-14-07
COUNCIL MEETING Date: 03-21-07
Department: Fire Department
Presenter: Al Duke, Fire Chief
Phone: 473-5381
SUMMARY: The Fire Department Command Vehicle was approved in the 2007 budget in the
Public Safety Bond Fund. The vehicle to be purchased is a 2007 Ford Expedition from the State
Contract. The nearest State Contract dealer is Columbia Ford of Longview Washington. The cost of
the vehicle will be $26,746.20 which includes sales tax. Once the vehicle is purchased with Bond
Fund proceeds, the vehicle will be placed in the ER&R fund.
ATTACHMENTS: None
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): $26,746.20
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
CONSENT AGENDA E1/~
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: That the City Council authorize the purchase of one 2007 Ford
Expedition form the State Contract for a total cost of $26,746.20.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
DATE SUBMITTED: March 6, 2007
BILL# 01- OlS6
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
Se
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Vehicle Replacement
Committee Meeting Date: March 14, 2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 21,2007
Department: PW&U
Presenter: Jim Orton, Fleet Mgr
Phone: 473-5536
SUMMARY: Two replacement vehicles for Utilities were approved in the 2007 budget. The
vehicles to be replaced are Y2 ton trucks, which will be replaced by Chevrolet Yz ton pickups from the
State Contract. The nearest State contract dealer is Bud Clary of Longview, W A. The total cost of
both vehicles will be $41,858.64, which includes sales tax. Existing vehicles will be sold at auction or
otherwise eliminated from the fleet in whatever manner is most advantageous to the City.
ATTACHMENTS: None
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): $41,858.64
APPROVALS: ~'
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:~n~/
l
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
-mC:4?~---
- . -~O-J/ '
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the purchase of two Chevrolet Y2 ton pickup trucks
from the State Contract for a total cost of $41 ,858.64.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
DATE SUBMITTED:
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
BILL# D1- ost
5 F~
.................................................~......................................
SUBJECT: Extension of Gold Mountain
Golf Complex Golf Professional Services
Agreement
Committee Meeting Date: March 14, 2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 21,2007
Department: Parks and Recreation
Presenter: Wyn Birkenthal
Phone: 473-5752
SUMMARY: The City contracts with Scott Alexander and Daryl Matheny for professional services
at Gold Mountain Golf Complex. The parties are negotiating a new agreement and request an
extension of the current agreement to June 31, 2007, with an option to extend the agreement for two
additional three month extensions subject to approval by the Parks and Recreation Director and the
Finance Director.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Council Memo
2. . Fifth Amendment to Agreement Between The City of Bremerton and Scott Alexander and Daryl
Matheny.
FISCAL IMP ACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The maximum impact for the proposed
amendment will not exceed $36,726 in 2007.
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
----
CONSENT AGENDA ff
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Fifth Amendment to Agreement Between The
City of Bremclion and Scott Alexander and Daryl Matheny and authorize the Mayor the finalize and
execute the agreement with substantially the same terms as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
Parks and Recreation Department
Wyn Birkenthal, Director
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Wyn Birkenthal, Director of Parks and Recreation
Re: Fifth Amendment to Agreement Between The City of Bremerton and Scott Alexander
and Daryl Matheny
Dale: March 7, 2007
In 2002 the City entered into a 5 year professional services agreement with Scott
Alexander and Daryl Matheny (Professionals) to operate the Gold Mountain Golf
Complex. In July of2006 the professionals notified the City of their desire to renegotiate
the contract as opposed to exercising the renewal clause for an additional 5 years under
existing terms. The Parks Department was amenable to the request to renegotiate the
agreement for several reasons 1) There is a desire to add incentives to encourage higher
revenue production at Gold Mountain. 2) The existing agreement contains ambiguous
language in the compensation section that has been problematic in the past. 3) The City
has a need to improve cash handling and reporting procedures that are not specified in the
current agreement.
As negotiations progressed it became apparent that a Management Services Agreement,
in many respects similar to the one under which the Conference Center operates would be
the best path forward to address the contractual issues raised by both the City and the
Professionals. The change from the current method of operation to a Management
Services Agreement places new requirements on the Professionals for budget
development, acquisition of an enhanced point of sale software system and more time is
needed to continue fine tuning details. The extension includes an adjustment in
compensation to reflect the City's desire to increase the speed of play by supplementing
the course marshal program above the amount stipulated in the current contract. The
payment for the additional course marshals is calculated at a rate equal to $7.93 per hour.
The Parks Department is requesting an extension of the current professional services
agreement to June 31 st, 2007 to provide an orderly transition period. The extension may
be renewed for up to two additional 3 month terms provided the Parks Director and
Finance Director concur that orderly progress is being made toward a Management
Services Agreement and that cash receipting issues raised by the State Auditor are being
addressed.
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF BREMERTON AND
SCOTT ALEXANDER AND DARYL MATHENY
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton ("City") and Scott Alexander and Daryl
Matheny ("Professionals") entered into a Professional Services Agreement dated May 15,
2002 (the "Agreement") for professional services relating to the Gold Mountain Golf
complex; and
WHEREAS, the City and Professionals amended the Agreement on June 24, 2004,
February 13,2006, December 29,2006, and January 18, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term through
December 31,2007;
NOW THEREFORE, for mutual consideration, City and Professionals agree as
follows:
A. This Fifth Amendment to Agreement specifically amends the Professional
Services Agreement dated May 15, 2002 (the "Agreement") entered into between the City
and Professionals as amended on June 24, 2004, February 13, 2006, December 29, 2006,
and January 18,2007 as follows:
1. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "Term", as amended in the
Third Amendment to Agreement, is amended to extend the termination date to June 31,
2007. The term of this Agreement may be extended for two additional three month terms
upon the written agreement of the Professionals and of the City upon the concurrence of
both the Financial Services Director and Parks and Recreation Director.
2. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "Duties of the Professional";
Subsection L is amended to read as follows:
L. Professionals must provide a course marshal a minimum of
346 hours per week for the months of May through September, 148 hours
per week for the months of March, April and November, and seven hours
per week for the months of November and December. forty (40) hours per
'Neck for the months of October through February, and 80 hours per \veek
for the months of Murch through September. In case of extended periods of
inclement weather, this requirement can be waived by mutual agreement of
the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Professionals. In such case, the
compensation will be adiusted accordingly.
3. Section 7 of the Agreement entitled "Compensation" IS hereby
amended to increase compensation as follows:
In consideration for the additional services provided by Professionals in
Section 2 above, City shall pay Professionals additional compensation as follows:
(a) For the months of May through September, $5,454.00 per
month
(b) For the months of March, April and October, $2,293.00 per
month
(c) For the months of November and December, $192.00 per
month
Payments shall be made weekly no later than the month following the
month of services, which payment shall be added to the base compensation paid to
Professionals in Section 7 of this Agreement.
B. The parties agree that the Professionals shall work with the City to address
the cash receipting issues addressed by the State Auditor 5n its management letter dated
September 18, 2006.
C. All remaining provisions in the Agreement, including the remaining terms
contained in Paragraph 3 of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect except as
expressly modified by this document.
D. This Fifth Amendment to Agreement will become a supplement of the
Agreement and all provisions will apply hereto.
E. The parties whose names appear below represent that they are authorized to
enter into this amendment and that is binding on the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Fifth Amendment to
Agreement on the day and year as indicated.
SCOTT ALEXANDER
THE CITY OF BREMERTON
DATE:
Cary Bozeman, Mayor
DATE:
DARYL MATHENY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bremerton City Attorney
DATE:
R:\Legal\Lcgal\Contracts\P ARKS\Golf Pro PSA-Mod5.doc
2
DATE SUBMITTED: Febmary 26, 2007
BILL # 01- 0<.00
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
5G
..........a.....a...........................m.......BD....m.............................
ND. 3oJ-7
SUBJECT: Resolution authorizll1g the
Director of Financial Services and Finance
Officer to designate certain expenditures for
potential reimbursement from debt proceeds
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
March 14, 2007
March 21, 2007
Financial Services
Laura L von
"'
473-5722
SUMMARY: The City of Bremerton periodically issues tax-exempt debt obligations for the purpose
of financing various City capital improvement projects. In order to maintain maximum flexibility in
the conduct of such debt issuances and to ensure compliance with the United States Department of
Treasury regulations regarding the City's ability to reimburse itself for qualified expenditures made
prior to the final issuance ofthe debt obligation - authorization is needed for the Director of Financial
Services and the Finance Officer to identify qualified capital projects for potential reimbursement and
to make official certification of intent to do so in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-
2.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution and explanatory memo.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None.
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
APPROVALS:
DEP ARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve Resolution No. 30 a. '7 authorizing the Director of Financial Services and the
Finance Officer to designate certain expenditures for potential reimbursement from bonds that may be
authorized and approved by the City Council in the future.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
RESOLUTION NO. 30;),,1
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, authorizing the Director of Financial
Services and the Finance Officer to designate certain expenditures
for potential reimbursement from bonds that may be authorized
and approved for issuance by the City Council in the future.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton, Washington (the "City") issues tax-exempt
obligations from time to time, (including bonds, leases and lines of credit) for the purpose of
financing its governmental activities; and
WHEREAS, the United States Department of the Treasury has promulgated
regulations limiting the ability of the City to use the proceeds of tax-exempt obligations for
reimbursement of prior expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the regulations permit the City to appoint one or more officials for
the purpose of identifying and qualifying capital projects for reimbursement purposes;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Apvointment of Director of Financial Services and Finance
Officer. Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2( e)(1), the City Council hereby
designates and appoints the Director of Financial Services and the Finance Officer of the City as
the responsible officials for the purpose of issuing statements of official intent in compliance
with Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2.
SECTION 2. Statements of Official Intent. Upon a determination by the
Director of Financial Services or the Finance Officer that the costs of a particular capital project
may be reimbursed from the proceeds of a tax-exempt obligation(s) ofthe City, the Director of
Financial Services or the Finance Officer is authorized and directed to execute a certificate of
official intent, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Each certificate so
executed shall become a part of the official records of the City available for public inspection
and review.
No capital projects will be undertaken unless such projects have been previously
approved in the customary manner by the City Council, and the execution of any intent
certificate shall not obligate the City to issue any debt, all of which shall require separate and
additional official approval by the City Council.
SECTION 3. Severa b ilitv. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or
sentences ofthis Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
1
Reimbursing Resolution
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
day of
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, this _
,2007.
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
P AULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
R: \Legal\Legal\Reso lutions\Finance\Reimbursing reso lution.doc
2
Reimbursing Resolution
EXHIBIT A
FORM OF OFFICIAL INTENT CERTIFICATE
Pursuant to Resolution No. _ of the City Council of the City of Bremerton,
Washington (the "City"), the undersigned, [Director of Financial Services][Finance Officer] of
the City hereby states as follows:
SECTION 1. The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures described
herein with the proceeds of debt to be incurred by the City (the "Reimbursement Bonds").
SECTION 2. The maximum principal amount of Reimbursement Bonds expected to be
issued is $
[Select one version of Section? J
SECTION 3. The expenditures with respect to which the City reasonably expects to be
reimbursed from the proceeds of Reimbursement Bonds are for
[ insert
general functional description of the property, project or program].
OR
SECTION 3. The expenditures with respect to which the City reasonably expects to be
reimbursed from the proceeds of Reimbursement Bonds will be made from
[insert name of fund or account from which the expenditure will be made
and description of the functional purpose of the fund, for example, capital improvement
program].
Dated this _ day of
,20_
[Director of Financial Services]
[Finance Officer]
P:INMNINMN2WU
)jm'.......m..... .."...........'....
H',
g:~
.............. ~... :.)...............~........
~:~ ..- ',,~
h'
'.z-.:.,' ,d"r:~> ,.W'". ,,'.-. <.,,'..','. <k"-y' __;;':
l:M-!::':i"i
":,_i:::i?-};'.<
Memorandum
To:
City Council Members
From:
Laura Lyon, Director of Financial Services
Re:
Designation of Responsible Individuals for the Purposes of Issuing
Statements of Official Intent to Reimburse Expenditures from Bond
Proceeds
Date:
February 26, 2007
The City of Bremerton periodically issues tax-exempt debt obligations to finance
various City capital programs. It is in the City's best interest to maintain the
financial flexibility to process and close a debt transaction at the time deemed
most advantageous for rates (timing of bond sale). It is also important to fully
use the bond proceeds within the permitted "spend down period" to qualify for the
arbitrage rebate exception for governmental issuers that expect to issue
$5,000,000 or less of bonds in the calendar year. In order to maintain this
flexibility, the City needs to be able to pay for expenditures prior to the debt
transaction concluding and then reimburse the funds expended from debt
proceeds. The United States Department of Treasury has promulgated
regulations limiting the ability of municipal debt issuers to use the proceeds of
tax-exempt obligations for reimbursement of prior expenditures - specifically, the
municipal issuer must declare official intent to issue debt of which a portion of the
proceeds may be used to reimburse itself for prior qualified expenditures no later
than 60 days after payment of the original expenditure. This official intent may
be made before any expenditure is paid. The points that must be covered in the
official declaration are as follows:
o The declaration of official intent may be made in any reasonable form
including a resolution of the issuer, action of an authorized person, or
specific legislative authorization for a particular project.
o The declaration of official intent must contain a general functional
description of the project, property or program to be financed by debt
obligation. A project description is sufficient if it identifies by name and
functional purpose, the fund or account from which the original
expenditure is paid (for example, "wastewater utility fund - wastewater
system capital improvements").
o The declaration of official intent must state the maximum principal
amount of debt expected to be issued (or incurred) for the project.
Previously, the City has passed project specific reimbursing resolutions.
However, the regulations permit the City to appoint one or more officials for the
purpose of identifying and qualifying capital projects for reimbursement purposes
and this would allow this necessary procedure to be attended to without formal
council action each time. The execution of any intent certificate does not
obligate the City to issue any debt. All debt obligations require separate and
additional official approval by the City Council and no capital projects will be
undertaken unless such projects have been previously approved in the
customary manner by the City Council (budget and capital improvement plan
adoptions).
The Wastewater Utility System budget and capital plan anticipates the City
issuing approximately $5 million in Wastewater System revenue bonds in the first
half of 2007. In preparation for this upcoming debt issuance, I will need a
reimbursing resolution action from the City Council to meet the IRS regulation
requirements. I am requesting that the City Council resolution authorize the
Director of Financial Services and the Finance Officer of the City to execute
certificates of official intent to reimburse itself from proceeds of tax-exempt debt
obligations for this and all future debt issuances. This would remove the need
for these actions to be regularly brought before the City Council and meets the
IRS regulation requirements.
Attached is the resolution authorizing such actions and an example (Exhibit A) of
the form of such official certification statements. I am asking for the City Council
to act on this resolution at it's March 2151 business meeting.
DATE SUBMITTED: March 1,2007
BILL #
o l - 01..:, \
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
SH
........................................................a...............................
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement for Legal
Services relating to the Phase II National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Permit appeal
Committee Meeting Date: March 14,2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 21,2007
Department: City Attomey's Office
Presenter: Mark E. Koontz
Phone: 473-2345
SUMMARY: City Council approved participation by the City in the appeal of the Phase II National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. A coalition of Cities and Counties have
joined together and appointed Foster Pepper PLLC to represent the coalition in any legal challenges to
the NPDES Phase II permits. The proposed interlocal agreement provides for the payment of legal
fees to Foster Pepper.
ATT ACHMENTS: Proposed Interlocal Agreement for Legal Services
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The initial agreement authorizes $275,000 in legal
fees to be split equally by all members of the coalition. The City's proportionate share is $8,333.33,
which shall be paid by the Engineering Stormwater Operations Professional Services fund. Funds are
available in the 2007 budget to pay these fees.
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
~/)/~ / .
CONSENT AGENDA ~
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Interlocal Agreement for Legal Services relating to the Phase II National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit appeal and authorize the Mayor to execute
the same with substantially the same terms and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BElWEEN THE CITIES OF ANACORTES, AUBURN,
BELLEVUE, BELLINGHAM, BOTH ELL, BREMERTON, BUCKLEY, BURl EN,
BURLINGTON, CAMAS, DES MOINES, ELLENSBURG, EVERETT, FEDERAL WAY,
FIRCREST, KENNEWICK, KENT, LONGVIEW,
MARYSVILLE, MOUNT VERNON, NORMANDY PARK, ORTING, PORT ANGELES,
PULLMAN, PUYALLUP, RENTON, RICHLAND, SAMMAMISH, SEATAC, SUMNER,
UNIVERSITY PLACE AND VANCOUVER AND KITSAP COUNTY REGARDING LEGAL
SERVICES
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into between the Cities
of Anacortes, Auburn, Bellevue, Bellingham, Bothell, Bremerton, Buckley, Burien,
Burlington, Camas, Des Moines, Ellensburg, Everett, Federal Way, Fircrest, Kennewick,
Kent, Longview, Marysville, Mount Vernon, Normandy Park, Orting, Port Angeles, Pullman,
Puyallup, Renton, Richland, Sammamish, SeaTac, Sumner, University Place, Vancouver,
and Kitsap County and any other Phase II Permittees that might join this Coalition of
Governmental Entities (collectively, "Coalition").
REelT ALS
1. The members of the Coalition are public agencies as defined by Ch. 39.34 of the
Revised Code of Washington, and may enter into interlocal agreements on the basis of
mutual advantage to provide services and facilities in the manner and pursuant to forms of
governmental organization that will accord best with geographic, economic, population, and
other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities.
2. The Phase II National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit is
required under provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act and requires members of the
Coalition in Washington to develop and maintain storm water programs. The Department of
Ecology (DOE) has adopted standards (DOE Standards) purportedly under the NPDES
Permit authority that may impose costly burdens on landowners, including members of the
Coalition and may also cause costly legal challenges to members of the Coalition as a result
of enforcing DOE Standards.
3. The potential impact of the DOE Standards on members of the Coalition and
property owners is so significant and far-reaching, members of the Coalition are joining
together to explore all legal and other avenues available to challenge the DOE Standards
including but not limited to filing an appeal with the Pollution Control Hearings Board. The
appeal deadline is February 16, 2007, the effective date of the DOE Standards. Members
of the Coalition wish to retain outside counsel (Counsel) to represent the Coalition in said
legal challenge(s) and wish to collectively pay Counsel as further set forth below.
NPDES INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 1 of 14
4. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and provisions contained
herein, Coalition agrees as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Purpose: It is the purpose of this Agreement to have the Coalition collectively pay
for the legal services of Foster Pepper PLLC (Legal Services) to represent the Coalition's
interests in any legal challenges to the NPDES Phase II permits (Litigation).
2. Duration: This Agreement shall be effective January 25, 2007, irrespective of the
date members of the Coalition execute this Agreement. Unless terminated by any party in
accordance with Paragraph 5, Termination, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect through conclusion of the Legal Services either through settlement of the dispute with
the State of Washington, Pollution Control Hearings Board order, court order or other court
disposition by the highest court authorized to hear an appeal of this matter, and/or other
mutual resolution of the legal challenge or Legal Services as agreed to among members of
the Coalition as provided in Paragraph 5.2 of this Agreement.
3. Administration: Coalition shall enter into a Joint Prosecution Agreement for the
administration of the Legal Services and Litigation. Said Joint Prosecution Agreement shall
include, but need not be limited to, a confidentiality agreement, establishing a structure for
the administration and oversight of the Legal Services and Litigation that is efficient and
effective given the number of Coalition who are parties to this Agreement, including
oversight of the legal costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement and any other subjects
necessary or appropriate to the administration of the Legal Services and prosecution of the
Litigation. If this Agreement is effective prior to finalizing the Joint Prosecution Agreement,
Coalition authorize the City of Bellevue to be Lead Agency to do all things necessary and/or
appropriate to pursue the Litigation on behalf of Coalition including but not limited entering
into an agreement for Legal Services as contemplated herein.
4. Payment:
4.1 The Legal Services' fees and costs shall be shared equally by all Coalition
regardless of a member of the Coalition's population or nature or any other factor
distinguishing it from another member of the Coalition. This obligation shall continue
through conclusion of the Legal Services as provided in Paragraph 2 above, unless a
member of the Coalition terminates its participation in this Agreement as provided in
Paragraph 5. Members of the Coalition hereby authorize said fees and costs up to a total of
$275,000. Additional fees and/or costs may be approved by written amendment to this
Agreement by Coalition.
4.2 The provider of Legal Services shall provide a monthly bill of its fees and
costs to Bellevue. Bellevue shall timely pay the bill on behalf of Coalition. Within 15 days of
approval of this Agreement, each member of the Coalition shall remit its proportionate share
NPDESllffERLOCALAGREEMENT
Page 2 of 14
of the fees and costs to the City of Bellevue. Bellevue shall place these funds into an
interest-bearing account, with any interest derived from these funds to be applied to the
costs of the provider of Legal Services. At the time of drafting of this Agreement 33
governmental entities have committed to joining this appeal; therefore the proportionate
share of each member of the Coalition is $8,333.33. In the event Bellevue must take legal
action to collect any amount due from a member of the Coalition, Bellevue shall be entitled
to recover all costs for said action including reasonable attorney's fees.
4.3 In the event additional governmental entities join this Agreement, the
proportionate share of each member of the Coalition shall be reduced accordingly. In the
event fewer governmental agencies participate in this Agreement or terminate their
participation, the proportionate share of each remaining participating member of the
Coalition shall increase accordingly.
4.4 While it is recognized that some members of the Coalition may not be
able to sign this Agreement before February 16, 2007, it is agreed that the members will
benefit from the Legal Services provided herein. Therefore, it is presumed that a member of
the Coalition which enters and signs this Agreement agrees to pay for Legal Services
performed as of January 25, 2007, regardless of the date ot signing. Adjustments to
amounts previously billed and received by Bellevue due to later joining members of the
Coalition will be reconciled on a semi annual basis.
5. Termination: I
5.1 Termination by Notice: Any participating member of the Coalition may
terminate its participation in this Agreement by providing at least three months prior written
notice to all other participating members. The terminating member must pay the full share of
the Legal Services Fees and Costs due through the date of termination three months from
the date of Notice. Should it become necessary to amend this Agreement to increase the
authorized total amount of fees and costs set forth in Paragraph 4.1, or a member's
proportionate share pursuant to Paragraph 4.3, any member may terminate its participation
in this Agreement by providing written notice to all other participating members within 15
days of receiving written notice of the request to amend fees and costs. This termination
shall not affect the obligation of the terminating member to pay its full share of the currently
authorized Legal Services Fees and Costs. Except as provided in Paragraph 5.2, the
termination of a member's participation in this Agreement shall not result in the termination
of this Agreement with respect to other members of the Coalition.
5.2 Termination by Mutual Written Agreement. This Agreement may be
terminated at any time by mutual written agreement of a majority of the then participating
members of the Coalition. Members shall be obligated to pay for Legal Services incurred to
the date of Notice to the provider of Legal Services that its services are no longer needed
and any reasonable additional fees and costs necessary to conclude its Legal Services.
5.3 Distribution of Assets upon Termination. It is not anticipated that any
assets will be acquired as a result of participating in this Agreement. If, however, any
NPDESThITERLOCALAGREEMENT
Page 3 of 14
assets are acquired with joint funds of the Members of the Coalition, those assets will be
equally divided among the members at the asset's fair market value upon termination. The
value of the assets shall be determined by using commonly accepted methods of valuation.
Additionally, any funds remaining in the interest-bearing account following conclusion of all
Legal Services shall be equally divided among the members of the Coalition.
6. Miscellaneous:
6.1 Amendments. This Agreement may only be amended by mutual written
agreement of the members of the Coalition.
6.2 Severability. If any section of this Agreement is adjudicated to be invalid,
such action shall not affect the validity of any section not so adjudicated.
6.3 Interpretation. The legal presumption that an ambiguous term of this
Agreement should be interpreted against the party who prepared the Agreement shall not
apply.
6.4 Ownership of Property. Any property owned and used by Bellevue in
connection with this Agreement shall remain the property of Bellevue and any property
owned and used by any other participating member of the Coalition shall remain the
. property of that member, unless otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement or its
amendment.
6.5 Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement will be sent to the
parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the
contrary. Any written notice shall become effective upon personal service or three (3)
business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and will be deemed
sufficiently, given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or any
other address if later specified in writing. Except for the requirement of Notice as provided
in this Agreement, nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the members of the Coalition
from communicating among themselves by email, fax or other electronic means. Any
governmental agency not specifically named herein, that later joins in this Agreement, shall
give to all members of the Coalition then participating under this Agreement written notice of
the name and address of the person that can accept notices on behalf of such joining
governmental agency.
6.6 Counterparts. This Agreement may be entered into with any number of
counterparts which, taken collectively, will constitute one entire agreement.
6.7 Ratification and Confirmation. All acts taken prior to the effective date of
this Agreement that are consistent with the intent and purpose of the same are hereby
ratified and confirmed retroactive to January 25, 2007.
6.8 Dispute Resolution. Should any dispute arise among members of the
Coalition or between one or more members related to the interpretation, application or
NPDES INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 4 of 14
administration of this Agreement, the disputing parties shall participate in a good faith
mediation effort to resolve their differences prior to bringing any legal action.
6.9 Compliance with RCW 39.34.040. Members of the Coalition entering into
this Agreement shall be responsible for ensuring that it is filed in accordance with RCW
39.34.040.
IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become
effective February ,2007.
ANACORTES: AUBURN:
CITY OF ANACORTES CITY OF AUBURN
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (F acsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
NPDESThITERLOCALAGREEMENT
Page 5 of 14
BELLEVUE BELLINGHAM:
CITY OF BEllEVUE CITY OF BELLINGHAM
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BOTH ELL BREMERTON:
CITY OF BOTH Ell CITY OF BREMERTON
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
NPDESThITERLOCALAGREEMENT
Page 6 of 14
BUCKLEY: BURIEN:
CITY OF BUCKLEY CITY OF BURIEN
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BURLINGTON: CAMAS:
CITY OF BURLINGTON CITY OF CAMAS
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
,
NPDES INfERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 7 of 14
~) - (Facsimile) ~) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DES MOINES: ELLENSBURG:
CITY OF DES MOINES CITY OF ELLENSBURG
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
>
~) - (Telephone) ~) - (Telephone)
~) - (Facsimile) ~) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
EVERETT: FEDERAL WAY:
CITY OF EVERETT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
NPDESThITERLOCALAGREEMENT
Page 8 of 14
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
FIRCREST: KENNEWICK:
CITY OF FIRCREST CITY OF KENNEWICK
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
KENT: LONGVIEW:
CITY OF KENT CITY OF LONGVIEW
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
NPDES INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 9 of 14
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARYSVILLE: MOUNT VERNON:
CITY OF MARYSVILLE CITY OF MOUNT VERNON
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
NORMANDY PARK:
ORTING:
CITY OF NORMANDY PARK
CITY OF ORTING
By:
By:
NPDESThITERLOCALAGREEMENT
Page 10 of14
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PORT ANGELES: PULLMAN
CITY OF PORT ANGELES CITY OF PULLMAN
By:
By:
Print Name:
Its: Print Name:
Date: Its:
Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
NPDESThITERLOCALAGREEMENT
Page 11 of 14
PUYALLUP: RENTON
CITY OF PUY ALLUP CITY OF RENTON
By: By:
Print Name: Print Name:
Its: Its:
Date: Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
LJ - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
RICHLAND: SAMMAMISH:
CITY OF RICHLAND CITY OF SAMMAMISH
By: By:
Print Name:
Print Name: Its:
Its: Date:
Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
-
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
NPDES INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
Page 12 of14
I APPROVED AS TO FORM:
I APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SEATAC: SUMNER:
CITY OF SEATAC CITY OF SUMNER
By: By:
Print Name:
Print Name: Its:
Its: Date:
Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
L) - (Telephone) L) - (Telephone)
L) - (Facsimile) L) - (Facsimile)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
UNIVERSITY PLACE: VANCOUVER:
CITY OF UNIVERSITY PLACE CITY OF VANCOUVER
By: By:
Print Name:
Print Name: Its:
Its: Date:
Date:
NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO:
NPDESThITERLOCALAGREEMENT
Page 13 of14
DATE SUBMITTED:
BILL # D 1 - O~ ,)....
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
51:
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Authorization to add a
permanent part-time Legal Assistant
Committee Meeting Date: March 14,2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 21, 2007
Department: City Attoll1ey's Office
Presenter: Roger A. Lubovich
Phone: 473-2345
SUMMARY: In October 2006 the City Attoll1ey's Office hired a temporary part-time legal assistant
to provide support in order to meet the litigation demands of the office. Since that time, it has become
apparent that a permanent part-time position would greatly benefit both the City Attorney's Office
and the Risk Management Office by providing constant confidential administrative support. Staffis
requesting to create a position for Legal Assistant at Professional Pay Band 5 and authorize allocation
of .25 FTE to the City Attorney's Office and .25 FTE to Risk Management. Further, staff requests a
budget reallocation from current 2007 available funds to fund the position for 2007.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Legal Assistant Job Description
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Funds necessary for 2007 funding of this position
($37,514.64 annually to be pro-rated) would be reallocated in equal amounts from the City Attoll1ey's
Office Supplies and Services Fund and the balance from the Risk Management Fund - Fund balance.
A 2007 budget adjustment will be required.
APPROV ALS:
DEP AR TMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
1~'k~ 7" .
CONSENT AGENDA 1RI
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to create the position of Legal Assistant at Band 5 of the Professional Pay Band and authorize a
.5 FTE to be paid equally from the City Attomey's Office and the Risk Management Fund and,
fUl1her, to authorize a budget adjustment to fund the position for 2007.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
Position Title:
Legal Assistant
Date:
Reports to:
City Attorney
Supervises:
Direct Reports
Total
FTE's
Bud2et Accountabilitv:
$
Revenue $
Authorities:
Status:
Exempt/non exempt Civil Service Classification: Exempt
Basic Function:
Provide confidential legal assistant and administrative support to
the City Attorney, Assistant 8ity Attorneys, and Paralegal
Duties and Responsibilities: List in order of time spent and underline the number of an
essential function.
No.
.L
~
3.
4.
5.
Task
Prepare draft correspondence, ordinances, resolutions and agenda bills from
brief instructions, notes, or ta e transcri tion
Arrange for service and filing of pleadings, motions, affidavits, certificates
and other documents in support of civil litigation by and against the City.
Assist in coordination and management of litigation calendar and assist with
liti ation su ort
Provide assistance and information to the public and other city departments.
Log and monitor work requests from the Mayor, City Council, and other
de artments
Maintain case mana ement and filin rocedures
Coordinate and erform administrative office rocedures
% Time
25%
25%
10%
10%
30%
Relationships:
Primary internal interaction is with all City department personnel and elected
officials. External contacts are with professional staff from cities, counties and the
private sector. Frequent public contact relating to operating procedures and general
information requests.
Legal Assistant
Page I
2/20/07
Knowled2e. Abilities. and Skills:
Knowledge of:
. Office administration, principles, practices and procedures
. Civil litigation rules and procedures
. Court procedures and requirements in State and Federal courts
. Correct English, grammar, spelling, punctuation and vocabulary
. Records management, including State retention schedule
. Telephone etiquette and techniques to properly assist a diverse
assortment of inquiries
. Technical record keeping techniques and requirements
Skills:
. Office administration functions
. Technical skills using computers and related software, including
spreadsheets and database applications; word processing; internet;
and e-mail
. Enhanced communication skills, including coordination with other
agencies and law offices
Ability to:
. Work independently and make responsible decisions in accordance
with policy and procedures
. Analyze, organize and prioritize work
. Communicate effectively, both verbally and in writing
. Compose, proofread and edit documents for clarity and correctness
. Maintain strict confidentiality
. Understand and comply with City of Bremerton policies and
procedures
. Carry out instructions furnished in written or oral format
. Deal effectively with a wide variety of people
Physical Requirements:
The physical demands described here are representative of those that must be met
by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job.
Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to
perform the essential functions.
While performing the duties of this job, the employee is frequently required to sit
and communicate effectively, use hands to finger, handle, feel, or operate objects,
tools, or controls, and reach with hands and arms. The employee is occasionally
required to walk. The employee must occasionally lift and/or move up to 25 Ibs.
Specific vision abilities required by this job include close vision and the ability to
adjust focus.
Legal Assistant
Page 2
2/20/07
Minimum Qualifications:
Two years of college or technical school and/or two years experience as a Legal
Assistant with progressively responsible experience or any combination of
education and experience which provides the required knowledge, skill and ability
to perform the work.
Workinl! Conditions:
The work environment characteristics described are representative of those an
employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. Work is
performed in a normal air-conditioned office situation.
Appointment and Removal Authoritv:
This position is filled by appointment by the City Attorney. Removal is at the will
of the City Attorney in conformance with procedures established by the City.
This classification specification does not constitute an employment agreement
between the City and employee. It is subject to change bylhe City as the needs and
requirements of the City change.
Legal Assistant
Page 3
2120107
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
BILL# Ol- Ol.o"~
DATE SUBMITTED: March 8,2007
5Y
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 500J_
amending BMC 3.64 and creating BMC 2.36
and repealing Resolution Nos. 2666 and
2772 all relating to lodging taxes
Committee Meeting Date: March 14, 2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 21,2007
Department: City Attomey's Office
Presenter: Roger A. Lubovich
Phone: 473-2345
SUMMARY: The current provisions of the Bremerton Municipal Code relating to lodging taxes are
incomplete and out of date. The proposed ordinance adds a chapter to the Bremerton Municipal Code
relating to the lodging tax advisory committee, providing for tenns for membership on the committee
and providing for duties of the committee relating to the administration of lodging taxes. The
ordinance also updates provisions relating to the lodging tax fund.
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed ordinance 1Jt>, 5{)Of
FISCAL IMP ACTS (Include Budgeted Amount):
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
CONSENT AGENDA IZI
GENERAL BUSINESS D
PUBLIC HEARING D
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Ordinance No. 500 I amending BMC 3.64 and
creating BMC 2.36 and repealing Resolution Nos. 2666 and 2772 all relating to lodging taxes.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
ORDINANCE NO. 600'1
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, amending Chapter 3.64 of the Bremerton
Municipal Code entitled "Lodging Tax", creating a new chapter,
Chapter 2.36, entitled "Lodging Tax Advisory Committee" and
repealing Resolution Nos. 2666 and 2772 relating to lodging taxes.
WHEREAS, the current provisions of Chapter 3.64 of the Bremerton Municipal
Code relating to lodging taxes are incomplete and out of date; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend Chapter 3.64 and create a new
chapter establishing a lodging tax advisory committee in order to update and consolidate the
provisions relating to the administration of lodging taxes; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Resolution Nos. 2666 and 2772 are hereby repealed in their
entirety. Repeal of these resolutions shall not affect existing programs funded by these
resolutions, which programs are hereby ratified herein as if these resolutions were not repealed.
SECTION 2. Chapter 3.64 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Civic
Improvement Fund" is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 3.64
CIVIC IMPROVEMENT FUND
LODGING TAX FUND
3.64.010 ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.
The provisions contained in Chapter 3.86 BMC entitled "Administrative Provisions for
Taxes" shall be fully applicable to the provisions of this chapter except as expressly stated to the
contrary herein.
3.64.GM020 TAX - GENERALLY.
There is levied a two percent special excise tax to be reimbursed to the City from the
state sales tax as provided in RCW 67.28.180 and there is levied an additional two percent
special excise tax as provided in RCW 67.28.181.
3.64JWl030 TAX - IMPOSITION.
As provided above there is levied a special excise tax of four percent on the sale of or
charge made for the furnishing of lodging by a hotel, rooming house, tourist court, motel, trailer
camp, and the granting of any similar license to use real property as distinguished from the
1
Lodging TlL,(
renting or leasing of real property; Provided, That it shall be presumed that the occupancy of real
property for a continuous period of one month or more constitutes a rental or lease of real
property and not a mere license to use or to enjoy the same.
3.64'()W040 DEFINITIONS.
For the purposes of this chapter, the definitions set forth in Chapter 3.48 BMC shall apply
to this chapter as applicable. In addition, the following definitions will apply:
(a) The definitions of "selling price", "seller", "buyer", "consumer" and all other
definitions as are now contained in RCW 82.08.010, as currently enacted or hereinafter amended
are hereby adopted by reference as if fully set forth herein. and subsequent amendments thereto,
are adopted as the definitions for the tax le','ied in this chapter.
(b) The definitions of the terms "acquisition," "municipality," "operation," "person,"
"tourism," "tourism promotion," "tourism-related facility" and "tourist" set forth in RCW
67.28.080 as currently enacted or hereinafter amended are hereby adopted by reference as if fully
set forth herein.
3.64.()4{}050 TAX - ADDITIONAL TO OTHERS.
The tax levied in this chapter shall be in addition to any license fee or any tax imposed or
levied under any law or any other ordinance of the City.
3.64'()SQ060 FUND CREATED- USE OF FUNDS.
There is created a special fund to be known as "civic improvement fund" in the treasury
of the City. .^.ll such taxes collected under this chapter shall be placed in such fund for the
purpose of paying all or any part of the cost of authorized uses outlined in RC\V 67.28 as now or
hereafter amended and until \vithdrawn for use, the moneys accumulated in such fund may be
invested in interest bearing securities by the City Treasurer in any manner authorized by lmv.
Pursuant to RCW 67.28.1815, there is created a special fund in the treasury of the city
and all taxes collected under this chapter shall be placed in this special fund to be used solely for
the purpose of paying all or any part of the cost of tourism promotion, or acquisition of or
operation of tourism-related facilities or to pay for other uses as authorized in Chapter 67.28
RCW, as now permitted or hereafter amended. Until withdrawn for use, the monies accumulated
in such fund may be invested by the city in any manner authorized by law.
3.64.(}{;()070 TAX - ADMINISTRATION AND COLLECTION.
For the purposes of the tax levied in this chapter:
(a) The Department of Revenue of the state is designated as the agent ofthe City for
the purpose of collection and administration.
(b) The administrative provisions contained in RCW 82.08.050 through 82.08.070
and in RCW Chapter 82.32 shall apply with respect to administration and collection by the
Department.
(c) All mles and regulations adopted by the Department of Revenue for the
administration ofRCW Chapter 82.08 are adopted.
(d) The Department is empowered, on behalf of the City, to prescribe such special
forms and reporting procedures as the Department may deem necessary.
2
Lodging Tax
3.61.070 VIOLATION PEN.A..LTY.
Any person violating or failing to comply with any of the provisions of this chapter or
any lawful rule or regulation adopted by the City Treasurer pursuant thereto, upon conviction
thereof, shall be guilty ofa civil infraction and subject to the provisions ofBMC Chapter 1.12.
Each day of violation will be considered a separate offense.
SECTION 3. There is hereby created a new chapter, Chapter 2.36 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Lodging Tax Advisory Committee" to read as follows:
Chapter 2.36
LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE
2.36.010 COMMITTEE CREATED - MEMBERSHIP.
There is hereby created the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee ("Committee"). The
Committee shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Mayor and City Council. The Committee
shall consist of five (5) members as follows:
(a) Two members appointed by the City Council wno are representatives of
businesses required to collect tax under Chapter 67.28 RCW;
(b) Two members appointed by the City Council who are persons involved in
activities authorized to be funded by revenue received under Chapter 67.28 RCW;
(c) One member of the City Council who shall serve as chair of the Committee.
2.36.020 APPOINTMENT.
Pursuant to Section 32 of the City Charter and as provided for in RCW 67.28.1817(1),
appointments to the Committee shall be made by the Mayor subject to confirmation by the City
Council, except the appointed council member who shall be appointed by the Council President.
Pursuant to Section 32 of the City Charter, the members identified in BMC 2.36.010 (a) and (b)
above need not be residents of the city, however, said members should represent interests doing
business in the city.
2.36.030 TERMS.
With the exception of the City Council member serving on the Committee, who shall be
appointed by the City Council on an as needed basis, all members appointed pursuant to BMC
2.36.020 above shall serve three (3) year terms. The initial appointment shall be staggered with
one (1) appointment serving a one (1) year term, one (1) appointment serving a two (2) year
term, and two (2) appointments serving a three (3) year term. Organizations representing
businesses required to collect to tax under Chapter 67.28 RCW and organizations involved in
activities authorized to be funded by revenue received under said tax as well as local agencies
involved in tourism and promotion may submit recommendations for membership on the
Committee to the Mayor.
3
Lodging Tax
2.36.040 COMMITTEE DUTIES.
The Committee shall review and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council
as follows:
(a) The Committee shall review and make recommendations to the Mayor and City
Council on any increases in the rate of tax imposed, repeal of any exemption from a tax imposed
or a change in the use of revenue received, including allocation of city lodging tax revenues,
pursuant to RCW 67.28.1815.
(b) Any such proposal shall be submitted to the Committee at least forty-five (45)
days before final action on or passage of the proposal by the City Council. The Committee shall
consider any such proposal, provide for public input, and submit comments in a timely manner to
the Mayor and City Council. The comments shall include an analysis of the extent to which the
proposal will accommodate activities for tourists or increase tourism, and the extent to which the
proposal will affect the long-term stability of the fund created under RCW 67.28.1815. Failure
of the Committee to submit comments before final action on or passage of the proposal shall not
prevent the City Council from acting on it. An amended proposal is not required to be submitted
to the Committee under this section.
(c) The Committee may adopt, and amend from time to time as deemed necessary,
rules and procedures for submittal, reviewing and processing of applications consistent with this
chapter.
2.36.040 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
The following criteria must be met and included in applications by all applicants and
recipients for any use or disbursements of the lodging tax funds, and any reserve created with
lodging tax funds:
(a) Applicants must provide information and documents as required in the application
form, pursuant to rules and procedures as may be established by the Committee and as otherwise
requested by the Committee.
(b) Proposals shall be dated and submitted in writing on a form or in a format as
required by the Committee. Proposals shall be submitted to the City Council office by the date
established by the Committee for submitting applications.
SECTION 4. The amendments to Chapter 3.64 BMC pursuant to this ordinance
do not affect the obligations relating to the inter-fund loan to the Civic Improvement Fund, now
the Lodging Tax Fund, for the benefit of the Admiral Theater pursuant to Resolution No.2760.
SECTION 5. Severabilitv. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the
day of
,2007
4
Lodging Tax
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
Approved this
day of
,2007
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
P AULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the
EFFECTIVE the
ORDINANCE NO.
day of
day of
,2007
,2007
R: \Legal\Legal\Ord inances\F inance\Lodgi ng Tax.doc
5
Lodging Ta.'\:
DATE SUBMITTED: March 8, 2007
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
BILL # Ot - O<O~
51<-
.......................................................a................................
SUBJECT: Re-appointments of
Silvia Klatman, Ruth Enderle,
Corky Trent, and David Tufts
To the Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee
Committee Meeting Date: March 14,2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 21, 2007
Department: City Council
Presenter: Wendy Priest
Phone: (360) 473-5280
SUMMARY:
Council has confirmed previous appointments to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee and with
passage of Ordinance No. S-O() I , Council must now authorize the re-appointments of those
individuals serving on the advisory committee with defined tern1S. The action before the City
Council is re-appointing Silvia Klatman, Executive Director of the Bremerton Area Chamber of
Commerce for a I-year term and Ruth Enderle, Executive Director of the Admiral Theatre for a
3-year term, as representatives of organizations eligible to receive funding; and Corky Trent, General
Manager for the Super 8 Motel for a 3-year term and David Tufts, General Manager for the Hampton
Inn and Suites for a 2-year term, as representatives of hotels that collect the lodging tax. The effective
date of each of the terms will be the same as the effective date of Ordinance No. 5001.
ATTACHMENTS: Applications for City Boards/Commissions
FISCAL IMP ACTS (lnclude Budgeted Amount): None
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
CONSENT AGENDA jg!
GENERAL BUSINESS 0
1Zf:;::--fJ!ilf~/~' PUBLIC HEARING 0
/tv / C?- F~
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to re-appoint Silvia Klatman for a I-year tern1; Ruth Enderle for a 3-year term; Corky Trent for
a 3-year tern1; and David Tufts for a 2-year tern1, with each term effective upon passage of
Ordinance No. SUOI.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
Jun 28 OS 02:32p
10.2
m.
,. '.
. ....".
APPLICATION fOR CITY BOARDS/COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEE
NOTE:
As In applicant for 8 City Board. CommJss;on or Committee, your name, addre", and
telephone number will be .".n.bIe to the press and pubtic. You will be contacted
before any action la taken on your appointment.
DATE: l...D - aCi ~00
NAME: Co '( Kid: "I r E:r'd:. HOMe .p,HONE:.:;j:OC) - 't"l..! -I ~OlLj
o Co. I , \ t ?oftorC.hO"ly
HOllE ADDRESCc?~Clg ~~!.t Lr-. STATE ~ ZIP CODEq't,l'lL> '7
OCCUPATION:. Y 'YEMPLOYER: ~I '6 m()~
WORK PHONE:.:3l.(} -~I/-~IE.MAlL: FAX:~ _~~ 9,,<:,'5
BUSINESS ADDR~: ';:{)l,,~ K d:~8 ~ ~~ --;p, YH'(lE"( ton, l A )~. . .~rOl
EDUCAnoN:h\q.h ~cnoo)QI l .
(Please type or print clearly)
I AM INTERESTED IN SEJ:tV'NG ON (please check one or more):
( ) Dieabilitv Action Commlteee ( ) PlannIng Commission
() Civil Service Commi..ion () P.rks & R_reatlon Commi.sion
, ) Ethics Commi...ion ( ) Citizen'. Comml.sion on Counclr Salaries
( ) Public Acee.. CItizens Advisory Committee ( ) Parking Advfeory Board
~ ) Community Development Block Grant ( ) Solid WMIle Management
Advisory Committee ( ) Bremerton .Housing Authority
: ) Ana (;ammi..ion
'64 OtherJodjr~4"iSl)f~ ~-dk4
· this IIn .ppfication for reappolntm.,nt? no
f yes, haw many year. hay. you ..rved on this commilll.ion'~ommlnee?
Please turn page -+
Jun 28 08 02:~Zp
1'='.3
WHY ARE YOU APPl- yaNG FOR THIS APPOINTMENT?
WHICH OF YOUR PERSONAL ANDIOR PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS PROMPTED YOU TO APPLY
FOR THIS APPOINTMENT:
HAVE YOU SERVED ON ANY OTHER BREMEATON BOARD~ COMMISSION, COMMf1'TEE OR TASK
FORCE? IF YES, PLEASE LIST:
n()
PLEASE LIST YOUR QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS APPOINTMENT (INCLUDE SKILLS. ACTtVlnES,
TRAINING, EDUCAnON);
.........
~
f-fiX~t
. ','
1/17/Q0
Application For City Boards/ Commissions/ Committee
Note: As an applicant for a City Board, Commission or Committee, your nanle, address, and
telephone number will be available to the press and public. You will be contacted before any
action is taken on your appointment.
(Please type or print clearly)
Date: February 15,2006
Name: Ruth
FIRST
Winona Enderle
MIDDLE LAST
Home Address: 14262 Komeda! Road
NUMBER STREET
Occupation: Executive Director
Home Phone: (206) 780-2131
WA
STATE
Bainbridge 1.
CITY
98110
ZIP
Employer: Admiral Theatre Foundation
Work Address: 515 Pacific Avenue
NUMBER STREET
Work Phone: (360) 373-6810
WA
STATE
Bremerton
CITY
98337
ZIP
Fax: (360) 405-0673
E-Mail: ruthe-atf@qwest.net
Education:
Attended WWtJ (Liberal Arts), Santa Ana College (EnglishlMusic/Arts), Saddleback College (Business),
Olympic College (JournalismlMath).
Local References (names and phone numbers):
Joanne Haselwood (360) 405-6208
Kyle Kincaid (360) 373-1488
Helen Langer Smith (425) 454-1121
I am interested in serving (please check one or more):
o Disability Action Committee
o Civil Service Commission (18 yrs. and older)
o Urban Forest Committee
o Public Access Citizens Advisory Committee
o Community Development Block Grant Advisory Board
o Youth Council
o Safe Streets Steering Committee
o Board of f\p~ea~HOllSi!lg/Buildil;g Codes.
IZJ Other LDcl'I"1 t ti-)( ~civ'-(,';;"r'f tOJMM.d~ ~
o Planning Commission (18 yrs. and older)
o Parks & Recreation Commission
o Ethics Commission
o Parking Advisory Board
o Mayor's Select Committee on Law Enforcement
D Bremerton Housing Authority
o Solid Waste Management
o Citizen's Commission on Council Salaries
City Appointment Application
Page I of2
Is this an application for reappointment? No.
If yes, how many years have you served on this commissionlcommittee? N/ A
Why are you applying for this appointment? Strong support for the activities for which this funding
legislation was designed. Major recipient.
Which of your personal and/or professional interests prompted you to apply for this appointment? Arts
activist (personal). Executive Director of the Admiral Theatre Foundation (professional).
Have you ever served on any other Bremerton Board, Commission, Committee or Task Force? If yes,
please list: No other Board, Commission, Committee, or Task Force.
Please list your qualifications for this appointment (include skins, activities, training, education): Please
see attached.
\Vhat are your community interests (committees, organizations, special activities)? Please see attached.
We welcome your willingness to serve Bremerton. For more information please contact the Mayor's Office at
(360) 473-5266, FAX (360) 473-5883 or via email at mayor@ci.bremerton.wa.us. Please return the completed
form to: Mayor's Office, 345 6th Street, Suite 600, Bremerton W A 98337.
City Appointment Application
Page 2 of 2
-_._~r-
".2
m!
, I I . ~ I ." ~ i!
:: !l.fl,: !.: )~..i :,:j
,',
APPLICATION FOR BOARDS/COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEES
239 4th Street. Bremerlon, WA 96337. phone (360) 478.5280 . Fax (360) 478-5251
NOTE:
As an applicant for THE LODGING TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE. your name. address,
and telephone number will be available to the press and public. You will be contacted
before any action is taken on your appointment.
(Please type or print clearly)
DATE: CJ /.91/IcJ L/
I
NAME: ---D)~}' L/;':) <-Ie, i:+ s
HOME ADDRESS: J (;; I k' [)~ k:. (t/..;, I:: 0/,
HOME PHONE: tix:D) C, ,;:)., re,
~
STATE k)f\ ZIPCOOE {'y,,:,'" i J
OCCUPATION: Dee ,'1. ~',i i-..A:' /?'It:Y-l C;, ~t(.'-' EMPLO~ER: )!(.~ 1'7'1/) /1;).1 1>);1 'i S~,,; J ej
WORKPHONE:(:S(; <-'J 4 I).;;;, O;k..'':':': EMAIL: i.e,,; Fir C?,"h.. 1-: I e,-, "<f)/H.,.FAX:' (;;0 O}'I{;I,~'(){' IS'
BUSINESS ADDRESS: / SD LA ':' )./1 .... fel.', 11/./( .-} it' r;~,/ ,Ie' . VI ~;;. S.?,??
1-'-"'''' " i ,I
EDUCATION: /'! /k:'ldl..z':(
i /) .- i '<::./'.<-
I....fJ' 6 <:""rr- (; fc:... ,,) I('-..b
"
LOCAL REFERENCES (~,,~t;: & PHONE NUMBER)
;"\ -r . ~ I 1- .':~s '"7 ,,;\ .. /><).~C
tJ ( . .,oJ c: )\...._.,., '""r ~"y",.j( \ /
/C '# I ..
f r' ,. <,"".. (-1,'-.,1 <>,~.. '-,:'~.,_'.".~~) -~:~l'-:' _:.~,-~'
'_.1' .'t)" \.} ,,'';'i.,..-!< / ',~.,"\.. .. ~ .,. , __
r-;: __'. I ~:). il ,.I! ~z. .. 'l -, .. .~: i'- \~.:;,
t."....,.. ! ,... I ~ Lt.rl~ -~ ! t,
NHY ARE YOU APPLYING FOR THIS APPOINTMENT:
\ . -- . . /"'~"l \. i
f~Si:::..".....f ./) J C.DG,-", (, ji'~;; ,I /yJ j/ ."1
--..",,' ~- , ..- .
:'
Please tl,lrn page ....,.
c'mo;!; cirycoun,i1~ci.brcmertO/l.wo.\iS . Web: "VWW,(i.bremcrtol1waus
WOcL:.l
cd WdL!:~0 p00c 6c 'd~S
09Sp!pt790c 'Ot.j XI::J.:.l
-~~ L~ U~ U~:U~p
p.3
WHICH OF YOUR PERSONAL AND/OR PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS PROMPTED YOU TO APPLY
FOR THIS APPOINTMENT:
,"":'""')
r:),::; 'l'\-
-~"'-I
" .::'
i"-..;'E' 1)-<.. '
.>
(: }7'1
......,~
~_.
if: t-. {' ~'. ('.:" "~";'(~"",..,.,....., L j ) A.v,<)
.,' .1 V.i.:::'...".,..."". ""'- .... ~ -'\.r ~ \..
i'G '-"'" Ol'1:1-if: /'L (~:,:t:~-::, (;.,~--::/ t./("...,/
.L .... .' ../
)- (.''-7,'" Cl(
...,"
!")C,-..<) ..' kt...-:).-J
HAVE YOU SERVEO ON ANY OTHER BREMERTON BOARD, COMMISSION, COMMITTEE OR TASK
FORCE? IF YES! PLEAse LIST:
.."'/"'7.,
" .f. {1
=-
PLEASE LIST YOUR QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS APPOlilfTMENT (INCLUOE SI()LLS, ACTIVITIES,
TRAINING, EOUCATION):
,
J~'j/
'1 L~
'T:~,,-.'K'"
.. ,
/1;, ..
/~-I'I I';'
;~. v';
(-) ., .
!;:y:(.L.~y,~~.;~t( I-'t~;t.,~ "I,.Z:~~
1"1 i .
\. ;1"",/
=
=
WHA T ARE YOUR COMMUNITY INTERESTS (COMMITTEES, ORGANIZATIONS, SPECIAL
ACTIVITIES)?
::I'
c:<~,.~-v
(~~- ,,/?;Z-'''b,,}~>,.. l~;)i~ ,"
,,:~./l
,
/t'~ j
,"":: ,,: ..J~ .
t (: t c../' ,.....)
f ' ....' I . .~ / _
--~
=
We welcome YOur willingness to serve Bremerton. Please return this completed form to:
COlJncil Office
239 4111 Street
Bremerton, W A 98337
(360) 101'8 528Q '{ 7 3 ~ 5 d. BO
(360) 47e S2~ FAX 473 ~ S'~SI
E-mail: Citycouncil@cLbremerton.wa.us
,..1 I.I..JRT 'C"Cl ~(An? C? -.-4",,...
DATE SUBMITTED: 03-07-07
BILL #
01 ~ Ol,~
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
toA
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement between
City of Bremerton and South Kitsap Fire &
Rescue regarding exchange of first response
fire protection and EMS services.
Committee Meeting Date: 03-14-07
COUNCIL MEETING Date: 03-21-07
Department: Fire
Presenter: Al Duke, Fire Chief
Phone: 473-5381
SUMMARY: This is an agreement between the City of Bremerton and South Kitsap Fire & Rescue
to exchange first response areas. Currently there are areas in each jurisdiction that are difficult to
respond to in a timely manner. The areas for the City of Bremerton are the Gold Mountain and
Anderson Hill region and for South Kitsap Fire & Rescue it is the Rocky Point and Navy Yard City
region. Because of the disparity in responses this would generate revenues that would allow for
staffing of the paramedic unit at Station #1.
ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): This will generate approximately $167,414 in
revenues with corresponding expenditures in the Fire Department. \)....~....., v-e..s eo. 'o-.)~.e~ c:..-e.~~
-\-0 ,...,~ ~~'t-..... -----; ~ "'-' ~ '--6.... ~."..CL) ~~..... 't.CXS1. \..~.......... '"\ \'l '1;1'
APPROVALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MAYOR:
--_.~~
--=- ,.
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT: CONSENT AGENDA 0
GENERAL BUSINESS f;;:l
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Interlocal Agreement between City of
Bremerton and South Kitsap Fire & Rescue regarding exchange of first response fire protection and
EMS services with a corresponding budget amendment and authorize the Mayor to finalize and
execute the agreement with substantially the same tem1S and conditions as presented.
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve D Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF BREMERTON & SOUTH KITSAP FIRE & RESCUE
REGARDING EXCHANGE OF
FIRST RESPONSE FIRE PROTECTION & EMS SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of ,2007,
between the CITY OF BREMERTON, a Washington municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as' "City", and SOUTH KITSAP FIRE & RESCUE, a Washington municipal
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "South Kitsap Fire". Herein, City and South Kitsap Fire
shall also be generically referred to together as "parties", or singularly as "party".
Washington State's Interlocal Cooperation Act, RCW, Chapter 39.34, encourages local
government units to enter into agreements with one another on a basis of mutual advantage in
order to make the most efficient use of their resources for the benefit of their respective citizens.
o
Washington's legislature, through Chapter 52.33 RCW, has set forth its intent that fire
protection agencies establish and monitor performance standards to the end that response times
concerning fires and emergency medical services (EMS) may be monitored and improved to the
end that the public will be better and more timely served.
The parties each provide fire protection, fire suppression, and emergency medical
services, primarily within their respective jurisdictions in Kitsap County.
The City and South Kitsap Fire currently cooperate with one another through mutual aid
agreements, and on a request basis, for assistance from one to the other.
Recently, the parties reviewed response times within various portions of their respective
jurisdictional service areas, and determined first response fire and EMS services to certain of
those areas could be more timely provided by the other party. "First responder" means the first
fire protection/EMS units sent to a particular area according to information contained in the
dispatch cards at CenCom.
The purpose of this Agreement is to establish what portions of each party's jurisdictional
fire and EMS service areas will be served by the other party acting as the first responder, to the
end that the most timely and efficient fire suppression and EMS services may be provided to
those areas.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
REGARDING EXCHANGE OF
FIRST RESPONSE FIRE PROTECTON & EMS SERVICES
Page 1 of7
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration bfthe foregoing recitals, and the
promises and covenants of the parties hereinafter set forth, they agree as follows:
1. First Response Services Provided by the City to South Kitsap Fire. The City
shall provide first alarm fire protection and EMS services (Basic Life Support [BLS] and
Advanced Life Support [ALSJ) to the following portions of South Kitsap Fire's jurisdictional
service area: ROCKY POINT and NAVY YARD CITY. Specifically, the boundaries of the
ROCKY POINT and NA VY YARD CITY service areas are identified on the map set forth on
the attached "EXHIBIT A", which by this reference is incorporated herein.
2. First Response Services Provided by South Kitsap Fire to the City. South Kitsap
Fire shall provide first alarm fire protection and EMS services (Basic Life Support [BLS] and
Advanced Life Support [ALSJ) to the following portion of the City's jurisdictional service area:
GOLD MOUNTAIN. Specifically, the boundaries of GOLD MOUNTAIN's service area are
identified on the map set forth on the attached "EXHIBIT B", which by this reference is
incorporated herein.
3. CenCom Dispatch Run Cards. The dispatch run cards maintained and followed by
CenCom's dispatchers shall be changed by the party representatives pursuant to Section 8 of this
agreement, to reflect the first responder obligations established in this Agreement.
4. Incident Command. When one party responds into the other party's jurisdictional
service area as a result of this Agreement, incident command shall be determined according to
the Incident Command System protocol followed by the parties.
5. Service Fees. Each time a party acts as first responder into the jurisdictional service
area of the other party, as identified in section 1 or 2 ofthis Agreement, regardless of the nature
of the call, the responding party shall charge a fee to the other party of $500.00 for its services.
On a quarterly basis, the parties shall meet and reach agreement on the number of first response
calls each made into the service area of the other party as identified in sections I and 2 hereof.
The Parties shall use CenCom and their own Records Management System data to cooperatively
determine the number of first response calls made by one party into the other's jurisdictional
service area. The party who makes more calls into the other party's service area shall bill the
other party at the rate of $500.00 for each "overage" call. For instance and by way of
illustration, in a given quarter, if the City's fire department makes 98 first response calls into
ROCKY POINT and NAVY YARD CITY, and South Kitsap Fire makes 6 first response calls
into GOLD MOUNTAIN, the "overage calls" made by the City would be 92. Under these
circumstances, the City would pay no fees to South Kitsap Fire, but South Kitsap Fire would pay
the sum of$46,000.00 to the City ($500 x 92 "overage" calls made by the City).
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
REGARDING EXCHANGE OF
FIRST RESPONSE FIRE PROTECTON & EMS SERVICES
Page 2 of7
6. Ambulance Transport Billin2s. It is agreed that, because of Medicare
requirements, that billings for ambulance transport shall originate from the transporting agency
and be billed directly to the person transported.
7. A2reement Evaluations & Modifications. The parties shall meet twice a year, in
August and February, to review implementation of this Agreement and its terms, and how such
implementation may be improved, and/or what Agreement changes should be made. The
delegation from each party shall consist of: the fire chief, or his/her designee; a representative
from the firefighter's union; and a member of the fire agency's operations' division.
At such meetings, possible changes in the agreed upon response areas identified in
sections I and 2 hereof, shall be discussed and tentatively agreed upon. After any such modified
response areas have been approved by the governing body for each party, they shall be reflected
in a modified EXHIBIT A and/or EXHIBIT B to this Agreement, which modified exhibit shall
be dated and signed by designated representatives from each party and replace the prior
EXHIBIT A or EXHIBIT B..
Any changes to the body of the Agreement recommended by the delegations from each
party, after being approved by the governing body for each party, shall be memorialized in an
amended Agreement which shall be duly enacted by the parties. Provided, however, if the only
change involves a change in compensation, such change shall be memorialized in and added
"EXHIBIT C" to the Agreement, which shall be dated and signed by designated representatives
from each party. As the compensations set forth in EXHIBIT C changes, such changes shall be
reflected in a new EXHIBIT C, dated and signed by representatives designated by each party,
which new EXHIBIT C shall replace the prior EXHIBIT C.
8. Party Representatives. Each party shall designate one of its members to act as its
representative to the other party, should the other party have any questions, comments, and/or
concerns regarding implementation of this Agreement. Each party shall keep the other party
appraised, on a current basis, of the name and contact information for its representative.
Initially, the representative for South Kitsap Fire shall be Wayne Senter, and the representative
for the City Fire Department shall be Al Duke.
9. Non-Assi2nment of A2reement Obli2ations. Neither party shall assign the
obligations placed upon it hereunder to any third party unless specifically approved by the other
party in wri ting.
10. Hold Harmless Provisions. Each party shall be solely responsible and liable for the
consequences of any negligent or wrongful act, or failure to act, by its employees,
representatives, and/or agents, in carrying out its obligations hereunder; and such party shall hold
the other party harmless from all said wrongful conduct, and shall indemnify the other party from
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
REGARDING EXCHANGE OF
FIRST RESPONSE FIRE PROTECTON & EMS SERVICES
Page 3 of7
any and all losses of every kind and nature, including attorney fees and costs, arising from any
claim or action related to its sole negligence.
11. Financial Considerations. The Interlocal Cooperation Act requires that the parties
establish how their joint undertaking pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act shall be financed
and what joint budget(s), if any, will be maintained. In answer to that statutory directive, each
party shall be solely responsible for its own costs incurred in carrying out the terms ofthis
Agreement; no joint financial accounts or arrangements shall be established. Also, no joint
budget shall be maintained regarding implementation of this Agreement; each party shall make
adequate provisions in its own agency budget for carrying out all its obligations hereunder.
12. Mana2ement of A2reement. The parties will not establish any separate legal or
administrative entity to manage the duties of each under this Agreement.
13. ACQuirin2. Holdin2. & Disposin2 of Jointly Acquired Property. The Interlocal
Cooperation Act requires that the parties establish how property will be acquired, held, and
ultimately disposed of. It is not anticipated they will jointly acquire any property, either real or
personal, in carrying out the terms of this Agreement. The property of either party used in
implementing this Agreement shall remain that party's sole prQperty and under the party's sole
control. If the parties do jointly acquire any property for the administration of this agreement,
prior to doing so, they shall reach written agreement as to what each will contribute to acquire
the property, who shall be in charge of acquiring and managing the property, and how it will be
held and ultimately disposed of at the time of this Agreement's termination.
14. Cooperation / Disputes. The parties shall strive to cooperate with one another in all
reasonable respects, and at all reasonable times, so the terms and spirit of this Agreement may be
fully implemented for the benefit of both parties and the public they serve.
If any disputes arise between the parties regarding this Agreement and its implementation
and/or interpretation, they shall both strive in good faith to settle all such disputes in a timely and
reasonable manner at the lowest possible level, with each being mindful and reasonably
accommodating of the interests and concerns of the other party.
15. Duration / Termination / Notices. This Agreement shall remain in effect
indefinitely until terminated by either party according to the provisions of this section. It may be
terminated by either party at any time and without cause, by the terminating party submitting
written notice to the other party of its intent to terminate this Agreement at least 60 days in
advance of the termination date, which termination date shall be set forth in the notice and occur
on the last day of the month stated in the termination notice.
For purposes of receiving written notices under this Agreement from each other, the
contact persons and addresses for submitting notices to the other is as follows:
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
REGARDING EXCHANGE OF
FIRST RESPONSE FIRE PROTECTON & EMS SERVICES
Page 4 of7
CITY OF BREMERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT
c/o CHIEF AL DUKE
911 Park Avenue
Bremerton, W A 98337
SOUTH KITSAP FIRE & RESCUE
c/o CHIEF WAYNE SENTER
1974 Fircrest Drive SE
Port Orchard, W A 98366
If the name or address of the contact person for either party ever changes, that party shall
promptly notify the other party of its new contact person and/or address for the receipt of notices.
All notices hereunder shall be deemed delivered to the receiving party two business days after
being deposited for mailing at a u.s. mail postal drop in Westem Washington.
16. Complete Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the full and complete agreement
of the parties as to the matters contained herein. No other verbal or prior written understandings
shall be provided with any legal effect whatsoever. Any amendments hereto shall be in writing
and signed by both parties.
17. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in
several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one
and the same instrument.
18. Approval of Parties. The Bremerton City Council duly considered and entered into
this Agreement at its regularly scheduled council meeting held on the _ day of
, 2007, and authorized the individuals signing this Agreement hereafter to sign
the same on its behalf.
South Kitsap Fire's board of commissioners duly considered and entered into this
Agreement at its regularly scheduled board meeting held on the _ day of
2007, and authorized the individuals signing this Agreement hereafter to sign the same on its
behalf.
19. Agreement to be Filed with County Auditor. Pursuant to RCW 39.34.040, this
interlocal Agreement shall be filed with the Kitsap County Auditor by South Kitsap Fire as soon
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
REGARDING EXCHANGE OF
FIRST RESPONSE FIRE PROTECTON & EMS SERVICES
Page 5 of7
as reasonably practical after both parties have duly executed it. The filing party shall thereafter
provide a fully conformed filed copy hereof to the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement, as ofthe dates
appearing by their respective signatures, to evidence their consent to all its terms:
CITY OF BREMERTON
by:
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
Date of Signing:
Attested to:
by:
PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
Date of Signing:
SOUTH KITSAP FIRE & RESCUE
by:
DAVID GELSLEICHTER, Board Chair
Date of Signing:
by:
WAYNE SENTER, Fire Chief
Date of Signing:
Attested to:
by:
RICHARD GROSS, Board Secretary
Date of Signing:
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
REGARDING EXCHANGE OF
FIRST RESPONSE FIRE PROTECTON & EMS SERVICES
Page 6 of7
"EXHIBIT A"
(* Attach map, and any other description, that clearly identifies the boundaries of the ROCKY
PO INT and NAVY YARD CITY fire and EMS response areas.)
/,.j;;T'\~:<;,r'~1i'l '~\
'\ ~ '1 0
o 1
..~....,
O-i/y. l
N :bJ,;;"~cL_
'" , P'd SndJ1;-.-
"'-<0"-"""".",,;1' /YO
r.v'" ~i.
~~,;), ~. ~ ;'-~
: rr;
5
u
415'0';>
-(~,
)~
~'\
(,/
",0
~\
\,
~' --{\-I'-N
c"- ;-\
s€.1'I>€.
'~'-~'<"._'--:-"'"
~o~ '-(\
-'\II " .
f,'J..J:'=~1V~7
. cJ, J,,;..;?
QJ <Yo
'.-.$; ~
:ttiNN?,;.O 0)
O/&CllIM
.....
o
o
N
o
o
N
0:::
L.L..
~
CI)
~
==
Q)
'S;:
s...
Q)
>
o
c
o
t::
Q)
E
~
OJ
-t1'
O<Y-
atJ';;wvv
'l'l
Q.
",<<'
s"p
,$'.
:r
';:.ON '-1
M atJ NOISS
DORA AVE
. '_. ."OC_~~.F'()~NT R D
. .,;3~O'
.'I'-d'<l'"
'-i'P '3"
j-
1.-......,
~'^^'''w
r......or. ~
. ~O,RGAN RD
';!J
. ~
,z
r
. Z
~-=. C0I38ET.DR
~"'~,-
.to""
.-1
,I
'(JJ
-1
C~()WARD W,AY
~s,p'<lr
~o'"
:;:-
..,~
'--Q
C!J
...,
',in
,;!J
'0
;!J,e
-l>
TI,MESAVE
,.. ;F(),RDAVE
'.. .."~ .. jAFAYEj-rEAVE N
-1
I
(JJ
-1"
E,PH/NNEY 8
-..A.YDR
.;CAMBRI-:"NAVE N
--'-r."-"-
WYCOFF N
CAL,LOW AVE N
CA,L.L<)VV AVE N
iO
-1
.I
j(J)
-1
,.._.__~NYDER AVE
:~
..-, , -I
I
'(JJ
-1
ONTGOMERY AVEN.....
RAIN I,ER.AV E
"WHITNEY AVE
'0;
.-1
.I
(JJ
,-1
R,i\INIERAVE
". !yO.--.....' ...
USTO", !__f:<IIIN'ER AVE
BLOOM .."11/10
'. INGTON AVE' '
:OLYMp ';"- TAFT AVE
...._I~~VE
'",
.0
"~""
'I
.(JJ
,-1
(f)
-<
r
<
)>
Z
:;;
)>
-<
:m
'(f)
(JJ
m
><
(JJ
-1
/-r IJ
I \
BUR\iVELL)iT
z
~
al
tr
w
~
en,
>-
0'
z,
w:
>
<'"
;ii
z,
Q,
1-;
<
z,
<
tr
o
o
zi
1lc:.
~
'~
'<"1> ,l\G~EAL "IV"
o .
KEI\N BLVD
.. WERNER kD
:;;
m
(f)
-<
I
r
r-
(f)
al
<:
o
f!.ASELvVOOD ST
-'I"
-:&
O'/-
<?-t-
~ ,0
~ S7i
~ 3; ~/
<( :3' OJ'
o UJ' 1-.
z; 12;':: ~,
Q~0~" t;.:
0' , OJ
,..:'tf 1//' 3: i
'''5 UJ:
~:
>-:
<.
cof
tr
W,
h
(/J
>-'
o
1ST ST
<
tr
o
o
(/J
OST
(/J'
w:
>
<:
21
0'
0:;
<:
::;:)
~COLUM':liA .'NAY
3:,
lU:
>!
<,
>-'
<,
CO!
tr,
w'
~,
(IJ~
bJ'
. I
~
~'/ '
\N__LOX~E..EOAGANS~LVD I
r.~..
'" .",
'" "~cp
,"~
'"'~ j
. '!1 Sr
!-c.ST
'",
,
.;
}ST
"'-.REBLE ST
G ST
U):
w
>
<
5!
ii"
<
:ii;
!~T
.. E.ST
3:
w,
>i
<,
w
H .giu
--"
tr,
<,
I
o
EST
D ST
D ST
gsT
3:
~i
z
<(I
::;::
f-!
~
o
0,
3:,
~:
(/J'
z'
~:
w'
00':
WI
~!
....J,;
<'
Z'
o ~-'""
~i
z"
I
.CST
I
i\1A().R.ONA SIL.
!.. LAUREL PL
':;;
m ",Q
, ;MCC/>.lclc~\.-
m"'" .,.
"
"
o
BST
z
--'
zi
0;
o
tr
,,~,;;;,
3:
cci
0'
3:
w'
>
~
al,
~
"-
'o.
f tfJ.
',j'
",
<Q
BU.~WELL ST
z
~,
<
z
o.
ii"
<
::;:
z
~,:
<
~
~
:ii
"',
en,
z.
w:
>
<
~
w
~
:5
1ST ST
w'
>
<
0'
0::'
o
\.L'
1-1
tr'
<('
:>:'
"-~
0'::'
'"
w
>
<
!::::
:ii
:ii
'"
(/J
I
I-i
::J'
o
(/J
COONTZ ST
PArr
, ,0",
, "-:1v~
(I)!
w
~!
z:
Qj
~,
~/
f=:
(/J'
z'
0;
ui;
FA RRf\Glh AVE
(/J
w'
~:..
o
>=
z,
~!
,
(I):
~;
<.
z
0,
"/-'--,
(/J,
W'
--,:
cC
<,
I'
Ui'
PORTER ST
..w
;;:
o
0:
0:
\.L
~
0::
<(
II
!;-'<:.<
~
PORTER S
(/J
w
?;:
~'<;
,f ,
0~-
,,0c;
0,0
C;"
o
~
",.
1-:
F'
(/J
z
o
o
(/J
w
>
<
2i
0,
~:
UJi
w'
--',
0:
.<
I
u
3:
tr,
0',
~1
0::':
cr
W,
:<i
SKFR ESZ 7183000
"EXHIBIT B"
(* Attach map, and any other description, that clearly identifies the boundaries of the GOLD
MOUNTAIN fire and EMS response area.)
0,
0::
W
'"
:s
Q.
4.l_ . -, "
S 1J)I NI
en
o
o
N
o
o
N
oes
.....
o
o
N
o
o
N
.In
N
en
W
c:
o
1::
(1)
E
~
co
'0,5,.....
0<1-
-r.;;
-b
,<y .
'" "
o
0::
Z
o
f-
u.
::;
o
9
o
s
CJ)
Nlsi'Jl ~it38 3NCJl
'005'
~O/Y
}'" ','
<I-~b
NlS ~,o ),1i6~olt _ ,
-"'-1
0::
o
s.
" w
5.
II
f-'
0::
o
Z
.......
o
o
N
o
o
N
1.:) N\tlil,^
'"
z
'"
""Q
v~
I.-
MS NNWHS
w
z
o
'"
u.
S
o
""
I
o
~
o
N
O. .
. ,," ""~
,.
o
N
s:-~
,,-"'/
<0'
s:
MS O~ ^~\t:)5~ .
M1.::JNmH\I
QW
Q.-
>-:
w;
-'
<.9!
Uj'
u.
z
-'
3:
(J)
ill i <( :
...J' :2 '
<C I <(..
ii i ui
<C ~II
Ea~ m\
u
sJ
(J)
ji
.". L"
s
(J)
o
'"
'"
S
ur
o
'"
w
'"
:5
>-
'"
'"
W
<D
S
(J)
318lii5 N'3>1SISMS
1-'
w
w
~i ~
~~- ---~
-<._.f;3. (3
<:(; z
~, ~
;;;:: (J)
(/): U5
;;;:
(J)
o
~
o
N
o
o
N
N
en
W
s:::::
o
t::
Q)
E
~
aJ
Srid~V::i .
'"
o
z'
o
Cfl:
"
Dear Council Member,
As a resident of the City of Bremerton and a member of the Bremerton Fire Department I
must ask you to delay this request of Chief Duke's until I get back in town so I can meet
with several of you to discuss this issue.
The daily staffing ofthe Bremerton Fire department is already low, and without any
additional work added, daily staffing for this department should minimally be at 15 per
day. With only lion duty every day we are only able to answer most of the calls with
our own units. Training continues to be interrupted, our training hours continue to go
down every year, pre-fire plans are not getting done and other specialized training is not
being completed. (Ladder truck training, hazardous materials training).
While on the surface it would appear that this may be the right thing to do, there are
numerous issues that need to be addressed.
I have included a list of some of these that you should be asking before you vote on this
Issue.
Is this the most important priority for the Bremerton Fire Department?
Do have the staffing to do this?
Will this require overtime?
Will the $$$'s collect cover the overtime?
What is the true cost of providing this service?
Is this the cost that all of the residents of Bremerton pay?
Is there any training needed?
Are you currently getting all of the training done?
What effect will the proposal have on your training?
Is there any additional equipment needed?
What effect will this have on your Shift Commanders?
If so what is it?
Is this proposal in the best interest of the city and the department?
How does this affect the Marine program?
If you were on a call in Rocky Point (South Kitsap Fire and Rescue) and
responding to a marine call for Central Kitsap Fire& Rescue how many units
would be left to provide service to the citizens of Bremerton?
Have your middle managers been engage in this discussion? Are they in favor of this
proposal as it currently is presented?
If not, why not?
Why should this be done now? Would we be better off to wait and see what the fire
department study says?
Here are some questions for the Marine 20 Program
Is this the most important priority for the Bremerton Fire Department?
Why did we discontinue the Marine program?
What does the needs assessment show?
Is this need currently being met?
What has changed to bring this matter back to the council?
With the contracts with South Kitsap Fire & Rescue and Central Kitsap Fire & Rescue,
will that add more calls? If so, how many?
Could responding to these calls cause a delay in services to our citizens?
What training is required?
How much training will you allow?
Will responding to calls with Marine 20 take away other training that is needed?
Has the training officer been engaged in these discussions?
Have your middle managers been engaged in this proposal?
Why should this be done now? Would we be better off to wait and see what the fire
department study says?
Respectfull y,
Ron McKiernan,
3525 Parker Lane
Bremerton, W A. 98310
DATE SUBMITTED: March 1,2007
BILL # ~~ 0 k_~_
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF 8REMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
~B
...........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Real Estate Purchase and Sale
Agreement with McCormick Land Company
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
March 14, 2007
_ March 21, 2007
Public Works & Utilities
_ Billl\lcKinn~____
473-5354
SUMMARY: McCormick Land Company owns approximately 30 acres of undeveloped property adjacent to Water
Utility forest land. This property had previously been identified in the 1996 Utility Land Management Plan and the
2000 Land U5e Guidelines Addendum for potential acquisition. Because of its proximity to current Water Utility
land the property has the potential to be used as an expansion to the Site 2 biosolids application site. The property is
bounded by Bremerton Water Utility land to the north and west; State Highway 3 right-of-way to the southeast; and
a private residence to the south. The property is relatively flat and consists of well drained soils. The property is
stocked with third-growth conifer approximately 25 years old. Land value was determined by a local appraiser
agreed to by the City. The value of $15,000 for existing tree cover was by mutual agreement. McCormick Land
Company has agreed to sell this property to the City for $165,000 total price (land and timber inventory).
ATTACHMENTS: I. Proposed Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement 2. Aerial Photo Exhibit
3. Appraisal Summary Report 4. Proposed Land Purchase Synopsis.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): The total purchase price for the property is $165,000. The 2007
Water Utility budget includes $300,000 for land purchases.
APPROVALS: . '
CI1Y ATTORNEY: ~
FINANCE DIRECTOR: ~: -
MAYOR: ~
COMMITTEE CHAIR:
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
~~~T
CONSENT AGENDA 0
GENERAL BUSINESS ~
PUBLIC HEARING 0
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement with
McCormick Land Company and authorize the Mayor to finalize and execute the agreement with
substantially the same terms and conditions as presented and further authorize the Mayor to finalize and
execute any and all documents necessary to close transaction.
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny D Table
D Continue D No Action
ab, Agenda Bills 2007, REP&S McCormick
REAL EST A TE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
WITH EARNEST MONEY PROVISION
This contract controls the terms of the sale ofreal property.
(Please read carefullv before shwing)
This Agreement is entered between the CITY OF BREMERTON, a Washington municipal
corporation, whose mailing address is 345 6th Street, Bremerton, Washington 98337, ("Buyer"), and
McCORMICK LAND COMPANY, a Washington corporation, whose mailing address is 4978 SW
Lake Flora Road, Port Orchard, W A 98367 ("Seller"), for the sale and purchase of real property as
follows:
1. PROPERTY. The real property being sold is vacant land only. The real property
and appurtenances situated thereon, which Buyer agrees to buy and Seller agrees to sell, is
approximately 29.61 acres (the "Property"), which Property islegally described in Exhibit A. A
map indicating the location of the Property is depicted in Exhibit B. Exhibits A and B are attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. EARNEST MONEY. Received from the Buyer, One Thousand and Noll 00 Dollars
($1,000.00), as earnest money and part payment on the purchase price of the Property.
3. PURCHASE PRICE. The total purchase price for the Property is One Hundred
Sixty Five Thousand and NollOO Dollars ($165,000.00), including earnest money, payable on
closing.
4. CONTINGENCIES. This agreement is contingent upon:
(a) Acceptance of its terms by the Bremerton City Council.
(b) Buyer's review and approval of the title report on the Property prior to Closing.
(c) A Feasibility Study as follows:
(1) Buyer shall have thirty (30) days from the date of mutual acceptance ofthis
Agreement to determine, in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion, if the Property is feasible for
investment and/or development by Buyer.
(2) If Buyer fails to notify Seller of its approval of the Property, in writing, on or
before the expiration of the feasibility period, then this Agreement shall be terminated, and neither
Buyer nor Seller shall have any further rights, duties or obligations hereunder, except that the Earnest
Money held in escrow, by Buyer to Seller shall be immediately returned to Buyer. Buyer agrees to
return the Property to its original state (e.g., fill all boring holes, etc.). Buyer shall notify and obtain
Seller's consent before entering on to the Property to conduct any feasibility study, test, survey,
investigation or examination as Buyer deems necessary; provided that Seller's consent shall not be
Page 1 of 8
umeasonably withheld. Buyer shall not permit liens or encumbrances to be placed against the
Property for expenses incurred as a result of any work done or studies undertaken by Buyer or at
Buyer's direction, and Buyer shall not damage the Property and will use its best efforts not to
interfere with the Seller's business operations on the Property in any way in the course of conducting
such studies and inspections.
(3) Buyer's feasibility study may include, but is not limited to, soil studies,
utilities availability and capacity, access availability, zoning, environmental assessment, preliminary
architectural and engineering studies and marketing feasibility.
(4) Buyer agrees to conduct its feasibility study at its sole cost and expense and
shall be liable to Seller for any property damage to the Property arising out ofthe sole negligence of
Buyer or its designated agent while conducting its feasibility study.
(5) Buyer shall provide Seller with the results of all environmental testing, reports
and other studies performed on the Property prior to Closing. In the event of, or discovery of, an
environmental condition on the Propeliy prior to Closing, Buyet may at its sole option, terminate this
agreement.
Should any of the contingencies of Section 4 not be met prior to closing, then this Agreement
shall terminate, except neither Buyer nor Seller shall have any further rights, duties, or obligations
hereunder, except that the earnest money held in escrow, by Buyer to Seller shall be immediately
returned to Buyer and except that Buyer shall remain obligated to return the property to its original
condition and remain liable for any property damage arising out of or in connection with Buyer's or
Buyer's agent's acts or omissions in conducting the feasibility study.
5. CONVEYANCE AND CONDITION OF TITLE. The title to the Property shall
be conveyed by Seller to Buyer at closing by Statutory Warranty Deed, free and clear of all liens,
encumbrances or defects except those described in Paragraph 6 below.
6. TITLE INSURANCE. At Closing, Seller shall cause LandAmerica Transnation
Title Insurance Company, whose address and telephone number is 9619 Levin Road NW, Silverdale,
W A 98383, (360) 692-4556, to issue a standard form owner's policy of title insurance to Buyer in an
amount equal to the total purchase price of the Property, and insuring the Property being discharged
by Seller shall be paid from Seller's funds at Closing. For purposes ofthis Agreement, the following
shall not be deemed encumbrances or defects: rights reserved and federal patents or state deeds;
building or use restrictions consistent with current zoning, and utility and road easements of record.
Iftitle cannot be made so insurable prior to the Closing date called for herein, unless, Buyer elects to
waive such defects or encumbrances, this agreement shall terminate. Buyer shall have no right to
specific performance or damages as a consequence of Seller's inability to provide insurable title.
7. CLOSING COSTS AND PRO-RATIONS. The cost of escrow shall be shared
equally between Buyer and Seller, except those fees which are expressly limited by Federal
Page 20f 8
Regulation. Taxes for the current year, rents, interest, water and other utility charges, ifany, shall be
pro-rated as of date of closing unless otherwise agreed.
8. CLOSING OF THE SALE. WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT TIME IS
OF THE ESSENCE FOR THIS AGREEMENT, this sale shall be closed by April 30, 2007, which
shall also be the termination date of this Agreement unless said closing date is extended in writing by
mutual agreement of the parties. When notified, the Buyer and Seller will deposit, without delay, in
escrow with LandAmerica Transnation Title Insurance Company, 9619 Levin Road NW, Silverdale,
W A 98383, all instruments and monies required to complete the transaction in accordance with this
Agreement. Closing, for the purpose of this Agreement, is defined as the date that all documents are
executed and the sale proceeds are available for disbursement to the Seller.
9.
POSSESSION. Buyer shall be entitled to possession on Closing.
10.
SELLER'S REPRESENT A TIONS. Seller represents:
(a)
closing.
that it will maintain the Property in its present or better condition until the date of
(b) that it has no knowledge or notice from any governmental agency of any violation of
laws relating to the Property.
(c) that the Property is not encumbered by any leases.
11. SELLER'S ENVIRONMENTAL REPRESENTATIONS. Seller represents that to
the best of its knowledge that it is not aware of existence of, or has caused or allowed to be caused,
any environmental condition during Seller's ownership of the Property (including, without
limitation, a spill, discharge or contamination) that existed as of and/or prior to the Closing date or
any act or omission occurring prior to the Closing date, the result of which may require remedial
action pursuant to any federal, state or local law or may be the basis for the assertion of any third
party claims, including claims of governmental entities. This provision shall survive the Closing and
be in addition to Seller's obligation for breach of a representation or warranty as may be set forth
herein. The limitation period for filing claims shall be consistent with applicable statutory and
common law limitations periods.
12. SELLER'S INDEMNITIES: Seller agrees to indemnifY and hold harmless the
Buyer, against any and all damages, claims, losses, liabilities, judgments, demands, fees, obligations,
assessments, expenses, and costs, including but not limited to all reasonable attorney's fees and costs
of suit, and including, without limitation, accounting, consulting, engineering and other expenses
which may be imposed upon or incurred by Buyer, or asserted against Buyer as a result of a claim by
any third party or parties (including, without limitation, a governmental entity), arising out of or in
connection with any hazardous waste contamination or other environmental condition existing as of
and/or prior to the closing date, including the exposure of any person to any such environmental
condition, regardless of whether such environmental condition or exposure resulted from Seller's
Page 30f 8
activities or Seller's predecessors in interests, except any and all of Buyer' s costs, fees, and expenses
for any environmental assessments, investigations, studies or reviews conducted by Buyer or at
Buyers request whether before or after closing.
Buyer shall notifY Seller in writing of any third party claim with reasonable promptness, and
~.o11o..... cohl")l1 'hl')"o. t-1..,,0. ....~rY"h+ f-r\. ......r\....-v-.-......r\.......,.,;sO' "..... ,..1a.+o._...l """"""'Ir ("'0...,......1-. ,....In;~ ............"...,;,-1.,:..,1 +t.."r..+ n..'1......l-.. "'....,........................^~;n.o
tJ\...-.lJ\,.I.l ,,:)UU.l11JUV\,.I Ll.1\,.1 .lll:).11L LV \..IVl.1.l'plVl111 \,... Vi U\,..o.l\..l11U auy ':->U\.;11 \..;-laH1i, j-'lVV JU\,.,tU lUOL ~U\,.l11 ~Ul111-'lVllH;::)"""
or defense of such claim does not negate the Seller's obligation to indemnifY and hold harmless the
Buyer.
Buyer shall release, indemnifY and hold Seller harmless from any and all liabilities,
obligations, judgments, demands, damages, causes of action, claims, costs and expenses, including
but not limited to all reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit, arising out of or in connection with
any contamination from hazardous waste or an environmental condition on the Property caused
solely by Buyer, its agents and representatives from and after the date of Closing. The indemnities
set forth above shall survive Closing for the applicable statutory and common law limitation periods
of the underlying claims and are in addition to Seller's obligation for breach of representation or
warranty .
13. DEFAULT AND ATTORNEY'S FEES.
(a) BUYER'S DEFAULT. IF BUYER DEFAULTS HEREUNDER, SELLER'S SOLE
REMEDY SHALL BE LIMITED TO DAMAGES AGAINSTPURCHASE IN THE LIQUIDATED
AMOUNT OF THE EARNEST MONEY PREVIOUSLY PAID THE BUYER. BUYER AND
SELLER INTEND THAT SAID AMOUNT CONSTITUTES LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: AND
SO AS TO AVOID OTHER COSTS AND EXPENSES TO EITHER PARTY IN CONNECTION
WITH POTENTIAL LITIGATION ON ACCOUNT OF BUYERS' DEFAULT. BUYER AND
SELLER BELIEVE SAID AMOUNT TO BE A FAIR ESTIMATE OF ACTUAL DAMAGES.
(b) SELLER'S DEFAULT. IF SELLER DEFAULTS HEREUNDER, BUYER SHALL
HAVE ALL THE RIGHTS AND REMEDIES AVAILABLE AT LAW OR IN EQUITY.
(c) ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS. Except as provided in Section 12,
in the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions herein, each party shall pay all its
own costs and attorney's fees.
14. NOTICE TO SELLER. This form contains provisions for an agreement for the
purchase and sale of real estate. The Buyer makes NO WARRANTY OR REPRESENT A nON OF
ANY KIND that this form, or any of its provisions, is intended to meet the factual and legal
requirements of a particular transaction, or that it accurately reflects that laws of the State of
Washington at the time you enter the agreement. THIS AGREEMENT HAS SIGNIFICANT
LEGAL AND FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES AND YOU ARE ADVISED TO SEEK
INDEPENDENT LEGAL AND FINANCIAL COUNSEL REGARDING THESE
CONSEQUENCES. IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE EFFECT OF ANY PART,
CONSULT YOUR ATTORNEY BEFORE SIGNING.
Page 40f 8
15. NON-MERGER. The terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement shall not
be deemed merged into the deed, and shall survive the Closing and continue in full force and effect.
16. NOTICES. All notices required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in
writing and shall be sent U.S. certified mail, retum receipt requested, addressed as set forth below:
(a) All notices to be given to Buyer shall be addressed as follows:
City of Bremerton
Attn: Bill McKinney
345 6th Street, Suite 600
Bremerton, W A 98337
(b) All notices to be given to Seller shall be addressed as follows:
McCormick Land Company
Attn: Doug Skrobut
4978 SW Lake Flora Road
Port Orchard, W A 98367
Either party hereto may, by written notice to the other, designate such other address for the
giving of notices as being necessary. All notices shall be deemed given on the day such notice is
personally served, or on the date of the facsimile transmission, or on the third day following the day
such notice is mailed in accordance with this paragraph.
17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, including all incorporated exhibits,
constitutes the full understanding between Seller and Buyer. There have been no verbal or other
agreements that modify this Agreement.
18. BINDING EFFECT AND SURVIVAL. This Agreement shall be binding upon
parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns; and the terms, conditions and
provisions of this Agreement shall survive the closing of this transaction.
19. DATE OF MUTUAL ACCEPTANCE. For the purposes of this Agreement, the
date of mutual acceptance of this Agreement shall be the last date on which the parties to this
Agreement have executed this Agreement as indicated below.
20. ASSIGNMENT. Buyer may not assign this Agreement or Buyer's rights hereunder,
without Seller's prior written consent.
21. Seller shall have only until 5:00 p.m. on the March 28, 2007, to accept the purchase
and sale agreement as written, by delivering a signed copy thereof to the Buyer or the Buyer's agent.
If Seller does not so deliver a signed copy within said period, this Agreement shall lapse and all
right of the parties hereunder shall terminate.
Page 50f 8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date set
forth below.
ill lVCD.
.1JU 1 LP,.
~~r.T T r.n.
0LLLGR.
THE CITY OF BREMERTON
McCORMICK LAND COMPANY
By:
CAR Y BOZEMAN, Mayor
By:
Its:
Dated:
Dated:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
R:\Legal\Legal\Files\Current Active Files\McCorrnick Land Purchase\REPSA-Final.doc
Page 60f 8
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCELl
TAX ID: 062301-2-050-2007
RESULTANT PARCEL C OF AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 9412160220; BEING TRA T PORTION OF
THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF STATE ROUTE 3; EXCEPT
THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY
INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN VOLUME 656, PAGE 286
Together with
PARCEL II
TAX ID: 062301-2-011-2005
TH PTN OF THE FDP L Y NWL Y OF A LN DRAWN PL W & 170FT NWL Y WHEN MEAS AT
RJAFR THECTRLN SURVEY OF S/HWYRT3 (PSHN021) CNVYDBY AUDNO 1122582
DAF, THPTNOFNW1/4NW1I4 DAF,BAAP ON THENW MGN OF SIHWYNO 14 (AKAPSH
NO 21 & NOW KNOWN AS SR 3) AS SD HWY EXIST 7-8-57 SD PT BEING S88*26E 976.29FT
& S 854.54 FT FR THE NW COR OF SD SEC TH NWL Y AT RJW WITH THE NL Y LN OF SD
HWY 200FT TH SWL Y PL W THE NL Y LN OF SD HWY 100FT TH SEL Y 200FT TAP ON THE
NL Y LN OF SD HWY 100FT SWL Y FR THE POB TH NEL Y 100FT TO POB
Page 70f 8
EXHIBIT B
Assessor's Map
~ I~~'.
1$1 _,.... I j ../'~'... J_
---'--,-~~ /,,,
I no~ '~.~l-I--L--T'~'
i I ... . .1 ',J ~
j Ii! I
t--_ m ...!~u. t ,~.'" fl' -~~.J==-_~ I L.L
- ----'-----------_1"
I ~Jr - i -~-+-
......------:-- h (}.6~ 'Ola
j ,.~~ I '
1: IIJJ j::::--- .-..- ."t--~..5~ - - ---
. _. ~ _ ,ij-l= H6:,,}
- -_ ---------L-_ - ('" A-., t -".,~.. _ n: ~
~- _ -~ I-- I --_1...____.____
'" I L =---.. ." ~-
J-~_.~ ~--- !.'..~~-i
~v~el
..,,!~~
on
~ -------
---------- ~--
Page 8af 8
o
"1l
..,
0
I\) "'C
0 0
0 en
0 CD
Q,
"tJ
r::
..,
(')
::r
D)
en
CD
w s:
0
0 (')
0 0
0
..,
3
-.
(')
"
r
D)
~
Q,
~ 0
0
<c .,,0 0
(DO .
(D )>
r+
-c
-c
..,
..lo. 0
- ><
-
II .
..lo. W
0 0
0 )>
0
- (')
..,
CD
en
&
~
,,"0
"'3
30>
",-0
.:.,-0
6.2.
....10
o
rJ&:
"';;:
Or
go
'"
o
)>
5:.
(,Tl
o
o
~
o
o
o
{ +2
SYNOPSIS
Proposed Land Purchase - McCormick Land Company Property
City Council Meeting 3/21/2007
Background
Public Works & Utilities has identified approximately 29.6 acres of property owned by
McCormick Land Company (MLC) for acquisition by the City of Bremerton. Because of
proximity to current Water Utility ownership it has the potential to enhance various Water Utility
operations and provide long term benefits to the City of Bremerton. The Water Utility operates
one of its permitted biosolids application sites on land adjacent to the MLC property. General
forest management operations also take place on the Utility lands.
. The MLC property had been previously identified by the City for acquisition in our land
management plan and guidance documents (1996 Utility Land Management Plan
and the 2000 Land Use Guidelines Addendum)
. Acquisition of this property was previously proposed to the City Council's Public Works
Committee (mtg. of 8/7/06) through a land exchange proposed by MLC. Issues on
the City parcel prevented consummation of an agreement. Acquisition is now
proposed as a direct purchase by City
. $300K for "Watershed Land Purchase" is included in the' Water Utility's 2007 Capital
Budget
Property Description
r".,
Two undeveloped parcels make up this property: Kitsap County Assessor's tax parcel #062301-
2-011-2005 consisting of 0.18 acres Undeveloped Land class, zoned RR; and tax parcel
#062301-2-050-2007 consisting of29.4 acres Forest Land class, zoned RR. The aggregate
property is bounded by Bremerton Water Utility land on the north and west, which is currently
used for forest management and biosolids application; State Highway 3 right-of-way to the
southeast; and a private residence to the south. The aggregate parcel is relatively flat and consists
of well drained soils. The most recent activities on the MLC property were timber harvesting
conducted in the mid-1980's and timber harvest of most of the remaining merchantable trees in
2005. The property is well stocked with third-growth conifer approximately 25 years old.
Typical tree cover on property.
Synopsis MLC Purchase
Portion of property fronting SR 3.
3/6/2007
Values
Land value was established by Richards & Associates appraisal dated 3/20/06. Non-
merchantable conifer (approximately 25 years old) value is by mutual agreement. Value table
follows:
Land
$150,000
Timber
Non-Merch. Timber
$15,000
Total
$165,000
Benefits for City Acquisition
. Blocks up Water Utility ownership -last major parcel along SR3 (over 2000 feet of
highway frontage); bounded by Water Utility property to the north and west
. Adds land compatible for forest management and provides additional acreage suitable for
application of Class B biosolids. Avoids possible future conflicts resulting from
non-compatible uses
. Simplifies management on surrounding Water Utility lands
. Because of location, topography and soils these parcels have potential for other uses in the
future
Issues for Consideration
. MLC has expressed willingness to enter into a sales agreement
. Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement prepared by City Legal staff
. City has existing access from West Belfair Valley Road at the Gold Mountain Golf Course
entrance
. Current Kitsap County Zoning described above - adjacent City property zoned as Forest
Management
. If acquired consider Annexation procedure
- ':.'')~~l ,:t:,:y P'~r.-f :...,..~ ,
_WI!!~t6.lh:'V;j.,,,<,Rc"'<1 1
'.....-S~3
... -.',)' 1"
~Sh',r
m
II
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
McCormick Acreage
Complete Appraisal, Summary Report
~ SuBJECT
West Side of State Route 3 at its
Intersection with Sunnyslope Road
Port Orchard, \Vashington 98366
I . . ')
\ M c. c 0:- \ol.-'\. \. c... \ <: k a v\ c.l Co.
~ ApPRAISAL BY
Gary D. Lyman, MAl
Jeannette A. Rogers, Associate
Richards & Associates
908 Bertha Avenue
Bremerton, Washington 98312
~ DATE OF' V ALUA nON
March 20, 2006
~ AUTHORIZATION
Bill McKinney, Forestry Manager
City of Bremerton
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, Washington 98310
06- J 43.2 :vlcCormick Acreage
- 1-
Richards&ssocicHes
I
I
!I
II
I
~-~ +
Ri h d / [>. "'\A
. C av S /~~ hssociates
REAL ESTATE A~'~R~I'~'E"~s"~ CONSULTANTS -
I'v1ay 12, 2006
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BilJ I\'lcKinney, Forestry I\'lanager
City of Bremerton
3027 Olympus Drive
Bremerton, \\,'ashington 98310
Re: Appraisal of uncle vel oped acreage on State Route 3, Port Orchard, Washington.
Dear ML McKinnev:
In accordance \vith your request, we have employed all applicable methods of appraisal analysis
required of a Complete Appraisal and submit our analysis within the follO\vingSummaJ}l Report
Our instructions \vere to estimate the Market Value of the Fee Simple interest in the subject
property in its current As-Is condition. The client for this appraisal is the City of Bremerton,
and/or their representatives, and its intended use is to assist in their analysis of the propel1y for
a proposed City ofBremeJ10n/McCormick Land Company prOpeJ1y exchange. McCormick Land
Company is also recognized as an intended user of this report.
PROPERTY OVER\:IEW
The subject of this appraisal involves 29.61 acres of undeveloped land located on the northwest
side of SR-3 near its intersection with Sunnyslope Road SW. This property is landlocked and
essentially represents timber land that is provided periodic access through adjacent City of
Bremerton O\vned land \vhen it has been logged in the past.
REPORT TYPE
To develop the opinion of value a Complete Appraisal process as defined by the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) has been utilized, and no depaJ1ures from
Standard 1 \vere invoked.
The appraisal analysis is presented in a Summary Reporr format \\'hich is intended to comply with
the reporting requirements set forth under Stand;;trds Rule 2-2(b) of the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) for a Summary Appraisal Repon. As such, it presents
only summary discussions of the data, reasoning, and analyses that were employed to develop the
appraisers' opinion of value. Supponing documentation concerning the data, reasoning. and
analyses is retained \\'ithin the appraisers' files. The depth of discussion contained \\ithin this
report is specific to the needs of the client and for the use stated above, The appraisers are not
responsible for the unauthorized use of this repon,
CD
o
00
to
(\)
""\
c-+-
::r
~
>
-::
Iv
....
r-'
-
Iv
ff
::l
....
(\)
'1
8'
::l
~
u;
::r
CD
00
CN
~
ro
"
UJ
0\
o
'-../
...t>-.
'-J
\D
I
N
UJ
UJ
N
!I
!
I
I
J
!I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Richardg~)Q"Associates
\ r~\ :"?~,~/ )
REAL ESTATE APP'R-A:rsE'RS~& CONSULTANTS
REPORT CONCLUSIONS
This appraisal takes into account pertinent factors regarding the subject property, and its
conclusions. are based on considerable research into current conditiol1S vv-ithin the Kitsap County
real estate market. Regional and national economic trends have also been considered in respect
to their impact on the local market.
'{ our attention is directed to the folJo\~'ing pages of data and analj'sis from which, in pal1, the
value conclusions v/ere derived, After careful consideration of appropriate data, it is our opinion
that the A1arkel Value of the Fee Silnple interest in the subject property in its As-Is condition, as
of Jl1arcl1 20, 2006, is estimated to be:
ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
($150,000)
At the above value estimates, it is our opinion that the prope11y could be successfully marketed
for sale within a one year period, If you should have any questions, or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact us, Thank you for the opportunity to be of service,
Sincerely yours,
.~~
~0x~
Jeannette A, Rogers, Associate
Gary D. Lyman, MAl
~~J6-14~.~ I'dcCc\rlllj~1-: Acreage
R Ichard~osc,c lales
CD
o
00
td
(\)
~
::r
p
>
-::
(\)
.....
:::
(\)
td
M
S
(\)
"1
r1"
9
.....
~
~
c.D
00
VJ
.......
IX)
"
VJ
0\
o
'-../
,+::...
--.J
'-D
I
N
VJ
VJ
N
Assessor's Map
/
J6 Jl
1 6
_n_/
OSO
"I.r'I~:'J~.<'
081
012
---------------~~~~~~-----
a7J
<~~,d!l:in;'.f
009
00.
H)"n~::rlJr~'
:=;?~~q~
0"
--G
Jf~~.f, r~.f~~.!
O<J
U'H-;
-,
:~t~,
l___
=.:--.:-
OOl
005
11'.'f- ~
I
Opt
I
,
0:7 '1
ut~!..::,~.::.. ___/!!.!..-_
I I
I
~
I
----
00/
}Jl~
f/'
I
II
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPRAISAL ASSIGNMENT
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
The subject of this appraisal involves 29.61 acres of undeveloped land located on the northwest
side ofSR-3 near its intersection with Sunnys!ope Road SW. This property is landlocked and
essentially represents timber land that is provided periodic access through adjacent City of
Bremerton owned land when it has been logged in the past.
OSTENSIBLE OWNER
No title report was provided to the appraisers for review and the property ovmership is assumed
to be the same as the current taxpayer which is indicated by Kitsap County Treasurer's records
to be:
McCormick Land Company
4978 SW Lake Flora Road
Port Orchard, Washington 98367
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The property is identified for appraisal purposes as Kitsap County Assessor's Tax Parcel Nos.
062301-2-011-2005 and 062301-2-050-2007, located within the Northwest Quarter of Section
06, Township 23 North, Range 1 East, W.M., in Kitsap County, Washington. Legal descriptions
as obtained from Kitsap County Assessor's records are also included in the Addenda section of
this report.
HISTORY OF CONVEYANCE
No sales involving the subject property appear to have occurred within the past five years. A
trade with the City of Bremer ton for land near Anderson Hill Road is being considered, however,
and is the reason for this appraisal report. The exchange of sites it intended to be mutually
beneficial as each party owns land adjacent to the parcels to be traded.
Please note that this discussion of sales history is intended to satisfy appraisal reporting
guidelines only, which are concerned mainly with price levels paid for the property within recent
years, and is not intended to detail all deviations in ownership interest which may have occurred
06-1432 McCormick Acreage
- 8 -
R IchanJs8Cssociates
i
.
.
I
I
.
.
I
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AI'PRAiS~4L ASSiGNMENT
over this time frame. This includes transfers of title, if any, between partnership, corporate,
family and/or marital interests.
INTEREST APPRAISED
The fee simple interest in the property is appraised.
INTENDED USE/USER OF THE APPRAISAL
The client of this appraisal is the City of Bremer ton and/or their authorized representatives. The
intended users are the City of Bremerton and the McCormick Land Company. The appraisal is
intended to assist the client in a proposed land exchange. Use of this report by others for any
other purposes is not intended by the appraisers, and no appraiser/client relationship is
considered to exist for any other use or users of this report.
SCOPE OF APPRAISAL
The appraisal process followed in the preparation of this summary report included an on-site
inspection of the subject property; an analysis of pertinent factors regarding national, regional,
and local economic conditions; an analysis of the Highest and Best Use of the land; and a
comparative analysis with similar properties in the area. Since the subject property consists of
raw land, emphasis in the analysis was placed on the Sales Comparison Approach as it applies
to undeveloped land.
The on-site inspection of the property was conducted on lv/arch 20, 2006, and consisted of a
walking tour of the southeastern and southern perimeters of the site and immediately surrounding
area. Due to topography and limited access, the appraisers were unable to conduct a walking
tOllr of the entire parcel. Photographs were taken during the inspection, and the physical
characteristics of the site were noted. It should be noted that no soils testing was conducted and
this appraisal assumes that no contamination exists which would have an adverse impact on the
value of the property. It is also assumed that the load bearing capacity of the soils is adequate
to allow building construction by standard meth~ds of construction.
In compiling data for the analysis, considerable research was conducted for comparable
undeveloped land sales. Sources of data included Northwest Multiple Listing Service records
06.1432 {"v1cCorll1ick Acreage
- ':1-
j( Iclwrd,&s<,oc imes
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPRAiSAL ASSIGNMEl'/T
for Kitsap County, MetroScan™, and in-house file data. Sales documents and other relevant
information (Warranty Deeds, Deeds of Trust, Short Plats, Surveys. etc.) were obtained from
copies of the County Auditor's records, and attempts were made to contact at least one of the
principals or an agent involved in the transaction to confirm the sale. Additional information
relative to the property was obtained from a number of sources, including but not limited to the
foil o\'vi ng:
J) On-site visits;
2) Assessor's records:
3) Treasurer' records;
4) Recorded documents;
5) Northwest Aerial Reconnaissance aerial photograph of site dated 7/]4/2005;
6) Kitsap County Soils Surveys;
7) Kitsap County Topographical and Building Limitations Maps.
This appraisal and report format are intended to meet the specific requirements of the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice as formulated by The Appraisal Foundation; in
addition to the minimum reporting standards stipulated by the Appraisal Institute, in which Gary
D. Lyman, MAl, is presently a member in good standing.
RELEVANT DATES
As-Is Value Estimate:
Date of Report:
March 20, 2006, the most recent date of on-site property inspection.
May 12, 2006, the submission date of the appraisal to the client.
06-1432 \1cCormlc~ Acreage
- ICI -
R ic hards&s,0Ci mes
iI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
SITE DESCRIPTION - SIZE & SHAPE
The subject prope11y is a 29.61 acre tract of forest land owned by McCormick Land Company.
According to Kilsap County Assessor's records, the property consists of two separate tax parcels
consisting ofroughly 29.43 and 0.18 acres. The latter parcel is the remainder of a tract which
\vas acquired for State Route 3. The facing page assessor's maps depicts the configuration of
the triangular shaped assemblage \vhich has roughly 1,955' of frontage along the nortlw..'esterIy
side of SR-3.
TOPOGRAPHY & GROUND COVER
\Vith the exception of a perimeter buffer and areas around a small ravine at the south\vest corner
of the property, the tract was clear-cut in about 1983, and subsequently replanted with fir trees.
A separate timber cruise has been commissioned by the> City of Bremerton to assess the
commercial value of the existing stand of trees.
Topography of the property is detailed on the follo\ving facing page map. As it indicates, the
property generally lies below the grade of its SR-3 frontage and slopes gently downward from
the south to n011h. Elevations above sea level range from roughly 400' near the south boundary
of the property to roughly 300' near its northeast corner.
SOILS CLASSIFICATIONS
According to the Soils Survey of Kit sap County Area, Washington, published in 1 980 by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, the subject soils generally fall into three main categories detailed as
foIlO\vs:
Land area along the highway frontage is classified as Alderwood verv r:ravellv sandv loam. 0 to
6 oereen! sloves. According to the survey it is:
"A moderately deep and moderately well drained soil on uplands. This soil is suited to urban
development if community seviage systems are built. The main limitations are depth to the
cemented hardpan and the seasonal perched \':~ter table. ]n areas of moderate or high population
density, onsite sewage disposal systems often fail or do not function properly during periods of
high rainfall because of these limitations."
06-143.2 i'vlcCormlch Acreage
- J 1-
R Ichards&ssoc lare,
ill
I
!I
II
II
I
II
II
I
tI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPERTY DESCRiPTION
Most of the northern portion of the site consists of Ragnar fine sandv loam, 6 to J 5 vereent
slaves. According to the survey:
"This deep, well drained soil is on terraces and uplands. The Ragnar soil is used mainly for
woodland. Some areas are used for hay, pasture, cropland, and homesites. The main limitation
for use of this soil for urban development is slope. CutbanKs may cave in excavations."
Much of the remaining land area within the center of the site consists of Neilton gravellv sandv
loam, 0 to 3 vereen! slaves. According to the survey:
"This deep, excessively drained soil is on terraces, benches, and uplands. This Neilton soil is
used for woodland and urban development. Some smalJ areas are used for pasture. Trees can
be harvested throughout the year by using proper equipment. This soil is capable of moderate
production of floral greenery, such as salal, evergreen huckleberry, and \",estern swordfern. This
soil is well suited to urban development. Cutbanks may ca\~e in excavations."
In general, the soils classifications confirm the moderate topography over much of the site and
its ability to be utilized as woodland. Residential construction also appears to be a viable form
of development if access could be obtained.
HAZARDOUS \V ASTE
No testing of soils was conducted by the appraisers, nor was a Phase 1 Environmental
Assessment provided by an outside source. The land is presently vacant and unimproved, and
no evidence suggests that it has been improved with any form of structures in recent years.
Given these conditions, the likelihood for soils contamination is considered to be low.
Therefore, lacking specific data to the contrary, this appraisal is based on the assumption that no
contamination that \vould have an adverse impact on property value presently exists on site. In
the event that environmental risks are discovered at a later date, a revised value estimate for the
property may be required. Please note that this revised estimate mayor may not be generated
simply by deducting the estimated costs to cure the environmental conditions. Properties known
to have environmental risks may cany a stigma in the market place \lv'hich could also affect their
market value,
()6.) 43.2 McCormick /\creage
. lB.
Richards&ssociales
!II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
ii
.
II
.
II
I
.
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPERTY DESCRiPTION
EASEMENTS, ENCROACHMENTS & RESTRICTIONS
No title report was provided to the appraisers for review and it is unknown whether or not any
easements and/or private use restrictions encumber the property. None were obvious during our
on-site inspection, however, and in the event that any exist, it is our assumption that they do not
have a material impact on the use and/or value of the prOperly.
ACCESS
The subject property has frontage along State Highway No.3, which is classified by the State
Department of Transportation as a "Limited Access Highway.)) Circa 1950, the State purchased
access rights from individual owners abutting the highway including access rights belonging to
the subject.
One possible means of access for the subject is from the abutting property to the south. This
parcel is improved with a single-family residence and has a developed driveway from SR-3.
However, according to the Department of Transportation, legal access to this parcel was
grandfathered and is for the exclusive use of this property. In order for the subject to obtain
access through this property, permission must be given from both the property owner possessing
this access and the State Dep311ment of Transportation.
Alternative access would have to be provided through City of Bremerton property which lies
adjacent to the north and west. Temporary access was apparently given in 1983 through city-
owned property for the duration of logging activities. Since a private condemnation against a
government entity is not legally possible, there is little to no chance of gaining permanent access
to the subject property across abutting parcels. Consequently, the subject parcel is effectively
"landlocked".
UTILITIES
Public utilities available to the property include power and telephone service ii.om existing lines
ofPuget Sound Energy and QWest Communications. Public water and sewer are not available,
and to our knowledge, there are presently no existing water wells or septic tank and draintield
systems developed on the parcel.
06-143.2 McCormick Acreage
- 19-
]< ichards(\;tssociates
LI
B
g
tI
a
tI
.
.
!i
I
I
.
.
I
I
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
TAXES & ASSESSED VALUATION
The subject parcel is taxed under the County's Forest Land designation which was created to
provide tax relief to owners whose property meets certain criteria. This designation requires a
minimum area of20 acres which is primarily devoted to and used for grovving and harvesting
timber. Upon removal of the land from this classification, the owner is responsibie for payment
of a Compensating Tax. The Compensating Tax is calculated by multiplying the difference
between the current Fair Market Value and the current Forest Lane! Value, times the current Levy
Rate, times the number of years in the program (not to exceed ten). This lax may be waved if
the property is sold to a government entity or to a nonprofit conservancy corporation, exclusively
for the protection and conservation of lands.
The land use designation, 2006 assessed valuation, and property tax burden, are summarized
below:
Assessed Valuation & Taxes for 2006
Land Use Assessed Estimated
Tax Lot Designation Value Taxes
062301-2-050-2007 Forest Land $3,990 $3558
062301-2-011-2005 Undeveloped Land $1,880 $16.78
Totals: $5,870 $52.36
ZO NIN G
The site is currently zoned Rural Residential by Kitsap County which allows the creation of new
lots at a maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit per f.ive (5) acres. Existing lots that me small
than five (5) acres are considered to be legal non-conforming sites.
FLOOD ZONE
According to Flood Map Community-Panel N~lmber 530092-0295-13, published by the U.S.
Department of I-lousing and Urban Development, and dated as of May] 5, 1980, the subject
property is located within a designated Zone C. This zone is an area of minimal flooding and
is typical of a majority of Kitsap County's non waterfront area.
06-143.2 McCormick Acreage
- 20 -
R ichards8CssoCIUlCS
II
I
iI
II
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
HIGHEST & BEST USE
According to the definition (see page 36), the analysis of highest and best Llse must meet four
criteria. This use must be (1) physically possible, (2) legally permissible, (3) financially feasible,
and (4) maximally productive. This applies to the land as ifvacant and as improved.
AS VACANT
P/-IYSICALL Y POSSJBLE USES
The subject property is large enough to accommodate a wide variety of potential uses. The
topography of most of the parcel is gradually sloping and soils conditions appear to be adequate
to allow development by normal methods of construction. Basic utilities such as power and
telephone service are immediately available to the parcel. The site does not have any legal
access, however, and the potential for obtaining access is extremely speculative. Given these
conditions, the physically possible uses for the overall prop~rty in its undeveloped state are
basically limited to its current use of timber production and/or speculation by a purchaser that
believes adequate access could ultimately be obtained.
LEGALLY PERMISSJBLE USES
Legal factors influencing the highest and best use of a site are primarily govermnent regulations
such as zoning, comprehensive plans, and environmental restrictions. The subject is zoned Rural
Residential. 1 unit per 5 acres by the Kitsap County zoning ordinance effective February 15,
1999 and many potential combinations for development are possible. Health Department
requirements generally have the greatest impact on development of residential lots. Public sewer
and water are not available and the subject would require installation of an on-site septic tank
and drainfield system, and drilling of an on-site well.
FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE USES
The test for financial feasibility involves a use which is physically possible, legally permissible,
and which generates a return greater than the combined income needed to satisfy operating
expenses, financial expenses, and capital amortization. All uses that are expected to produce a
positive return are regarded as financially feasible. In the subject case, the potential of the
subject is severely limited due to the Jack of access. The unavailability of access to a public
right-of-way basically limits the subject's use to timber and/or Christmas tree production until
such time as permanent access becomes available.
06-143.2 McCormick Acreage
- 21 -
I{ Ichards8tssoclales
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
HIGHEST & BEST USE
MAXIMALLY PHODUCTlVE USES
A maximally productive use is the use among financially feasible alternatives which produces
the greatest net return. With the current zoning of Rural Residential, and the unavailability of
permanent access, Highest and Best Use of the subject site is to continue its use for forest
management until such time as access can be obtained.
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
06-1.)32 McCorllllck Acreage
- 22-
R Icl1dfds&sSIJCI<lleS
.
II
.
.
.
.
.
.
II
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE VALUATION
LAND VALUATION - CORRELATION AND CONCLUSION
The seven sales considered in direct comparison with the subject focused on properties with
limited access, limited availability of utilities, and limited development potential due to either
zoning or environmental conditions. With the exception of one transaction that occurred in
December 2002, the remaining transactions all closed within roughly the past 18 months, and
ranged in price from $2,186 to $10,000 per acre.
The high end of the range ($10,000 per acre) was represented by Comparable Sale No.3. This
is a slightly smaller site that has direct blacktopped frontage on a public roadway and generated
an acreage price that could not be achieved by the subject due to its access issues. On the other
hand, the low end of the range ($2,186 to $3,014 per acre) was generated by Comparable Sales
4,6, and 7. These are larger sites than the subject and involve properties with environmental
issues in addition to access problems. It is our opinion that ~hese sales set the lower limit of
value for the subject, which should fail somewhere between the high and low indicates discussed
above. Remaining Comparable Sales 1,2, and 5, range from $4,242 to $7,745 per acre and all
involve smaller sites with similar to superior development potential.
No attempt is made to apply site specific adjustments to each of the comparables in direct
comparison with the subject, given the variables and unknowns associated with its access
problems. Greatest emphasis, however, is placed on the lower end of the mid range comparables
and a rounded value of $5,000 per acre is considered a reasonable estimate. At this value level
(excluding merchantable timber) the following is indicated for the subject.
29.61 acres @ $5,000 per acre = $148,050
Indicated Land Value, rounded. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. $150,000
06-1432 McCormick Acre~ge
- 32 -
R Ich"rds&ssoc lales
DATE SUBMITTED:
BILL #
01- [)(o7
AGENDA BILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
c.oc
........................................................................................
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 5600
amending BMC Ch. 6.04 regarding garbage
collection and BMC Ch. 7.05 regarding
livestock in newly annexed areas
Committee Meeting Date: March 14, 2007
COUNCIL MEETING Date: March 21,2007
Department: City Attorney's Office
Presenter: Roger A. Lubovich
Phone: 473-2345
SUMMARY: The City is annexing areas and some property owners in annexed areas, which have
traditionally been more rural in character, have declined collection, removal and disposal of garbage
and refuse services, which is mandatory in the City. Additionally, other property owners have
maintained livestock on their property. The proposed ordinance allows certain property owners in
newly annexed areas to decline collection, removal and disposal of garbage and refuse services and to
maintain livestock under certain conditions.
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed ordinance N1>. 50() 0
FISCAL IMP ACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): None
APPROV ALS:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
COMMITTEE CHAIR
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
~
~M' ~ pro '
CONSENT AGENDA D
GENERAL BUSINESS D?:I
PUBLIC HEARING D
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to pass Ordinance No. SOO,O amending BMC Ch. 6.04 regarding garbage collection and BMC
CIl. 7.05 regarding livestock in newly annexed areas
COUNCIL ACTION: D Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
ORDINANCE NO. 5000
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremel1on, Washington, relating to newly annexed propel1ies by
amending Sections 6.04.020 and 6.04.040 of the Bremerton
Municipal Code regarding the collection, removal and disposal of
garbage and refuse and by amending Section 7.05.0 I 0 of the
Bremerton Municipal Code regarding livestock.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton is annexing areas to the City; and
WHEREAS, some property owners in annexed areas, which have traditionally
been more rural in character, have declined collection, removal and disposal of garbage and
refuse services, which is mandatory in the City; and
WHEREAS, some property owners is these annexed areas have also maintained
livestock on their property which is currently prohibited within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to allow certain property owners to decliae
collection, removal and disposal of garbage and refuse services and to maintain livestock under
certain conditions; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 6.04.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Intent
of this Chapter" is hereby amended to read as follows:
6.04.020 INTENT OF THIS CH:\PTER MANDATORY COLLECTION. REMOVAL
AND DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE AND REFUSE.
The maintenance of health and sanitation require, and it is the intention hereof, to make
the collection, removal and disposal of garbage and refuse within the City, compulsory and
universal is mandatory. Property with existing residential uses annexed to the City after January
I, 2007, to which mandatory collection is not being provided on the date of annexation, are
exempt from mandatory collection unless ordered to obtain service by the City Hearing
Examiner in a code enforcement proceeding due to public health and safety concerns. This
annexation exemption applies until such time as title to the property is transferred to a new
owner.
SECTION 2. Section 6.04.040 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled
"accumulation and Disposal of Refuse" is hereby amended to read as tollows:
Allllexatioll-
Garbage & Livestock
6.04.040 ACCUMULATION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE.
(a) It shall be the duty of every person who owns or is in possession, charge, or in control of
any dwelling, f1at, roominghouse, group home, apartment house or other multi-residential unit,
hospital, school, hotel, club, restaurant, boardinghouse, or eating place, or who owns or is in
possession, charge or control of any shop, place of business or manufacturing establishment
where garbage, refuse, or swill is created or accumulated, at all times to keep or cause to be kept
portable appurtenances, metal or other approved containers in sutlicient numbers, for the deposit
therein of garbage, refuse, and recyclables, and to deposit or cause to be deposited the same
therein. Upon request, the garbage collector may provide a solid waste container larger than the
standard garbage container that may be suitable for automated pick up. Yard waste may be
collected at the place where garbage containers are left, in containers or bundled so that they will
not be scattered by the wind or tipping over of the container and can be easily picked up by the
collector.
(b) The lids on garbage containers shall not be removed, except when necessary to place
garbage and refuse in such cans or take the same therefrom. When garbage and refuse is placed
therein or taken therefrom, such lid shall be securely replaced by the person placing the same
therein or taking the same therefrom. Such containers shall be kept in a sanitary condition with
the outside thereof clean and free from accumulative grease and decomposing material. Each
container shall be kept in a place easily accessible to the garbage truck on collection day and
shall be removed from the city right-of-way between collection days. The property owner and
occupant is responsible for ensuring that the lids are properly secured on the containers and that
said containers are removed from the right-of-way between collection days.
(c) Each garbage can shall be kept clean inside and out so that no odor nuisance shall exist.
(d) In the case of isolated dwellings or places of business located in sparsely settled portions
of the City, or where reasonable access cannot be made by truck, garbage and refuse therefrom
may, upon special arrangement with the garbage collector, be otherwise collected, removed and
disposed of Garbage and swill shall not be disposed of upon private premises by incineration.
(e) Large suitable containers for collection of both garbage and refuse may, with the
approval of the collector, be used by hotels, restaurants, boarding houses, eating places,
apartment houses and other multi-residential units, schools and hospitals, and in the business
district.
(f) Except as provided in BMC 6.04.020, tt-iLshall be the duty of every person to cause
garbage and refuse to be removed and disposed of only by the garbage collector, Provided,
however, That items that will not fit within a garbage container may be transported by the owner
thereof to a county approved disposal site for disposal.
(g) It shall be the duty of every person in possession, charge or control of any dead animal
or upon whose premises the same may be located to forthwith cause the same to be removed and
properly disposed of by Animal Control and to pay the required disposal fee.
2
A Illlexatioll-
Garbage & Live...;tock
SECT/ON 3. Section 6.04.020 of the Bremerton Municipal Code entitled "Intent
of this Chapter" is hereby amended to rcad as follows:
7.05.010 PROHIBITED ANIMALS.
(a) Possession of 'lny creature that is venomous, poisonous, or wild is prohibited.
(b) Prohibited animals include, but are not limited to, lions, tigers, bears, monkeys,
chimpanzees, gorillas, cougars, mountain lions, badgers, wolves, hybrids, coyotes, fox, lynx,
alligators, caiman, crocodiles, or any venomous/poisonous creature; provided, that circuses,
zoos, licensed trappers and animal welfare organizations are exempt from this regulation if
proper safeguards are taken, as required in the event permitting process, to protect the public and
that the animal control authority is notified of their arrival and duration of stay in the city;
provided further, that State-registered wildlife rehabilitation centers are exempt from this section
with regard to care and rehabilitation of those wild animals that are indigenous to North
America.
(c) Snakes over seven (7) feet in length are prohibited.
(d) Livestock is prohibited inside the Bremerton city limits; provided,
i) that this provision shall not apply to individuals in the process of transporting
livestock through the City when such entry into the City is of minimal duration and the livestock
are properly secured for transport in a cage or other suitable enclosure~
ii.) owners and authorized occupants of property annexed to the City after January 1,
2007, upon which livestock is maintained on the date of annexation, may continue to maintain
livestock on the property unless ordered otherwise by the City Hearing Examiner in a code
enforcement proceeding due to public health and safety concerns. During said time there may not
be an expansion of livestock or livestock activity on the property beyond that which existed at
the time of annexation. This annexation exemption applies until such time as title to the property
is transferred to a new owner.
SECTION 4. Severabilitv. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this ordinance are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this ordinance and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECT/ON 5. EffCctive Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force ten
(I 0) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council the
day of
,2007
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
3
A II II exatioll-
Garbage & Livestock
Approved this
day of
,2007
CARY BOZEMAN, Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PUBLISHED the
EFFECTIVE the
ORDINANCE NO.
day of
day of
,2007
,2007
R:\Legal\Legal\Ordinanees\Community Dcvclopment\Annexations - Garbage 8: Livestock.doc
4
A II 11 exatioll-
Garbage & Livestock
AGENDA HILL
CITY OF BREMERTON
CITY COUNCIL
O't-
BILL # ~f}
DATE SUBMITTED: 3/7/07
,A
....................................-....................................................
SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Ordinance
No. ~ approving annexation of the 'West
Hills Island' of unicorporated terri tory to the
City of Bremertol,k.
ftNDf::S-rf}e>L-tSf-fIN<P INrtr(.jN! ZOtJI!\J(p
Committee Meeting Date:
COUNCIL MEETING Date:
Department:
Presenter:
Phone:
C ONTrc..OLS,
3/14/07
3/2 1/07
Comm. Development
Andrea Spencer
473-5283
SUMMARY: The Ordinance approves annexation by the abbreviated island annexation method, and
sets an effective date of the annexation ordinance as May 7,2007. The annexation is subject to
BOUll\:try Review Board review, and resident petition for a recall election before it may be effective.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Ordinance No. 5QQd- 2.) Resolution 3023 initiating West Hills Island
annexation proceedings 3.) West Hills Island Annexation Report & Cost / Benefit Analysis A-"l!)
S-rA1:=f:- rI'€:,Mo D~5Ce.6INfo Vlf(Jfr7€;S To .$740'1 To P-tFt.k-.:r INT€fZ.tN1 '2oNIN~ Co"-lTIloc.-S.
FISCAL IMPACTS (Include Budgeted Amount): Costs / benefits of annexation detailed in
Annexation Report.
APPROVALS:
DEP ARTMENT DIRECTOR:
CITY ATTORNEY:
FINANCE DIRECTOR:
MA YOR:
-FISCAL/BUDGET: .
orr::R A TIOP' 'S' Pt...AA.>,vIAJ&, ,
~ n ,. Cow\W1. cftA1~
COUNCIL PRESIDENT:
CONSENT AGENDA 0
PUl3LU EARI~&-
RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pass Or . nance N . oooJ.- approving annexation of the
West Hills Island) f\'DoPTINf? INTE.R-IM -ZVI'-Il"-fG CuNTR.oLS,) ftND E.ST/1e.~H(N(' wt<l.f\JColl-- U/Sl"IZ1c..T,j
COUNCIL ACTION: 0 Approve 0 Deny 0 Table
o Continue 0 No Action
ORDINANCE NO. 5002
AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, approving the annexation of certain lands
comprising approximately 171 acres in the West Hills area of West
Bremerton situated within an island of unincorporated Kitsap
County territory that is completely encompassed by City of
Bremerton; adopting comprehensive plan and zoning designations,
subject to interim zoning controls adopted herein; adopting interim
zoning controls of RIO zoning in a majority of the area designated
Industrial; setting June I, 2007 as the etTective date of the
annexation; and establishing Council Districts for the annexed
area.
WHEREAS, RCW 35.13.182 provides for an abbreviated procedure to annex
unincorporated islands of property having at least 80% of the boundaries of such area contiguous
to the city, initiated by City Council Resolution; and
WHEREAS, City Council seeks to annex territories within City of Bremerton
Urban Growth Areas that contribute to the overall economic and social health and well being of
the City and lead to an orderly and logical pattern of development; and
WHEREAS, the proposed area for annexation is legally described and further
depicted in Exhibit A, legal description and Exhibit B, map, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the proposed area tor annexation is located within the City's Urban
Growth Area (UGA) and is completely encompassed by the City; and
WHEREAS, the land use designations previously established by the City for the
proposed area for annexation are Low Density Residential (LOR) and Industrial (I) as depicted
on the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap County, during its recent ten year comprehensive plan
update, signiticantly reduced the area designated Industrial in the West Hills Island which is
inconsistent with the City's designation tor the area; and
WHEREAS, Much of the area designated Industrial by the City currently consists
of residential uses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the City's Industrial designation
should be re-evaluated and designated to be consistent with the County's land use designation
and the existing uses in the West Hills Island through the City's annual comprehensive plan
West Hills Island Annexation
amendment process and fUliher that interim zoning controls pursuant to RCW 35.63.200 should
be implemented until such time as the comprehensive plan amendment process is completed; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.13.183, the Bremerton City Council passed
Resolution 3023 on February 21,2007 initiating proceedingstor annexation of the West Hills
Island, and setting a date for public hearing of March 21,2007; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.13.1822 residents and property owners in the
area proposed tor annexation have been afforded an opportunity to be heard during a public
hearing on March 21, 2007 at the regular City Council meeting, and all statutory notice
requirements tor said hearing including publish in a newspaper oflocal circulation have been
provided; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.13.1821 the annexation is subject to potential
referendum for 45 days after passage if a petition is prepared and signed by qualified electors in
number equal to not less than ten percent of the votes cast in the last general state election in the
area to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton estimates that there are approximately 325
voters residing in the area, and this estimate is prepared based on the number of housing units
located in the area proposed for annexation, and this number is subject to revision and
adjustment based on Kitsap County Auditor records; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has filed a Notice of Intent to Annex
document with the Kitsap County Boundary Review Board (BRB) and official BRB filing date is
pending, and the annexation may not be effective before the Boundary Review Board statutory
review period has expired; and
WHEREAS, City of Bremerton has prepared an analysis of the costs and benefits
and the anticipated fiscal impacts to the City of annexing the West Hills Island; and
WHEREAS, City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City to approve
the proposed annexation as presented, require the simultaneous adoption of the comprehensive
plan for the area proposed to be annexed as set forth in this ordinance and require the assumption
of all or any portion of City indebtedness by the area to be annexed; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOllOWS:
SECTION I. There shall be annexed to the City of Bremerton, Washington,
certain property situated in Kitsap County, Washington, commonly known as the "West Hills
Island", which is legally described in Exhibit A attached hercto and incorporated hercin by this
reference, and as further identi tied in the map attached as Exhibit B incorporated herein by this
reference.
2
We....-t Hills b1and Annexation
SECTION 2. The property hereby annexed shall assume and be subject to its
proportionate share of the City's existing indebtedness and shall be assessed and taxed at the
same rate and on the same basis that other property with in the City of Bremelton is assessed and
taxed to pay for any outstanding general indebtedness of the City, if that indebtedness has been
approved by the voters, contracted tor, or incurred prior to, or existing at the effective date of this
annexation.
SECTION 3. The City's Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Low
Density Residential (LDR) and Industrial (I), and Zoning of Residential Low Density (R I 0) and
Industrial (I) are hereby adopted tor the West Hills Island annexation area as set forth in Exhibit
C incorporated, herein by this reference subject to the interim zoning controls adopted herein.
Based on the findings of fact set forth in the above recitals, the City Council hereby determines
that it is necessary to adopt interim zoning controls for part of the annexation area. Accordingly,
pursuant to RCW 35.63.200, there is hereby adopted interim zoning controls of Residential Low
Density (R I 0) zoning on that portion of the Industrial designation as shown in Exhibit C which is
redesignated as Interim R- I 0 as shown in Exhibit 0, incorporated herein by this reference. As
long as the interim zoning controls are in effect, all use and development shall be subject to the
City's land use and development regulations in effect for RIO zoning.
SECTION 4. The interim zoning controls will expire six months from the
effective date of annexation as defined in Section 6 below, unless the interim zoning controls are
shortened or extended by action of the City Councilor until the effective date of any ordinance
establishing new comprehensive land use designations for the West Hills Island, which ever is
sooner.
SECTION 5. The comprehensive plan and zoning designations for the West
Hills Island shall be included in the City's annual comprehensive plan amendment process for
2007 for review and redesignation as appropriate.
SECTION 6. This annexation will become effective June 1,2007 or the date
following the expiration of the Boundary Review Board's 45 day review period, or if subject to a
referendum election vote, the effective date of annexation pursuant to said vote if passed,
whichever is later, and on that date, the annexation area shall become a part of the City of
Bremerton, subject to all the laws and ordinance of the City except as otherwise provided by law.
SECTION 7. This annexation ordinance shall be subject to potential referendum
for 45 days after its passage. To initiate a referendum a petition signed by qualitied electors in
number equal to not less than ten percent of the votes cast in the last state election in the area to
be annexed must be prepared. If a timely and suHicient referendum petition is filed with the City
Council, the question of annexation will be submitted to voters during the next general election,
if one is to be held within 90 days, or at a special election called not less than 45 days nor more
than 90 days after the filing of the petition.
SECTION 8. Pursuant to RCW 35.13.260 within thirty (30) days from the
effective date of this annexation as provided by law, the City Department of Community
Development (DCD) ofthe City of Bremelion shall, under the direction of the Mayor of the City
3
West Hills b.1and Annexation
of Brcmerton, detennine the resident population of the annexed telTitory, which population
detennination shall consist of an actual enumeration of the population that shall be made in
accordance with he practices and policies and subject to approval of the State of Washington's
Office of Financial Management and which population shall be determined as of the effective
date of this annexation as specified in this ordinance. DCD shall prepare a certificate signed by
the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk in such fOnl1 and containing such infonnation as shall
be prescribed by the State Omce of Financial Management and the City Clerk shall thereafter
submit that certificate in triplicate to the Office of Financial Management together with the
population determination of the annexed territory.
SECT/ON 9. Upon passage of this annexation ordinance, the City Clerk of the
City of Bremerton, pursuant to RCW 35.13.150, shall send to the omce of the Clerk of the
Kitsap County Board of Commissioners a certified copy of this ordinance.
SECT/ON 10. City Council Districts. Upon the effective date of annexation, the
property annexed by this ordinance shall be assigned to Bremerton City Council Districts 8 and 9
as depicted in Exhibit E incorporated herein by this reference.
SECT/ON 11. Severability. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECT/ON 12. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force 10
days after the date of publication.
day of
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington this_
,2007.
WILL MAUPIN, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, City Attorney
PAULA JOHNSTON, City Clerk
R:\Legal\Legal\Fiks\Current Active Fiks\Annexation - West Hills Island\Annexation Ordinance.doe
4
West Hills Island Annexation
Exhihit A
Legal Description
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR \VEST HILLS ISLAND ANNEXATION
Those portions of Sections 16 and 21, Township 24 North, Range I East, W.M., described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of the Plat of Leibly & Blumer's I sl Addition to Bremerton Heights, as
recorded in Volume 3 of the book of plats, Page 89, records of Kit sap County, Washington, also being a point
on the east--west centerline of said Section 21, also being on the westerly right of way of Howe Street and the
True Point of Beginning; thence westerly along said centerline to the east line of the southwest quarter of the
northwest quarter of said Section 21; thence northerly along said east line to its intersection with the northerly
right of way for Werner Road; thence westerly along said northerly right of way to its intersection with the
westerly right of way of Ida Street (formerly Maple Street); thence northerly along said westerly right of way to
its intersection with the southerly right of way for Rogers Street; thence westerly along said southerly right of
way to its intersection with the westerly right of way of Broad Street; thence northerly along said westerly right
of way to its intersection with the north line of said Section 21; thence westerly along said north line to its
intersection with the easterly right of way of Tweed Lane; thence northeasterly along said easterly right of way
to its intersection with a line 150 feet south of and parallel to the north line of the southwest quarter of the
southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence westerly along said line to its intersection
with the west line of said Section 16; thence northerly along said west line to its intersection with the centerline
of Price Road; thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Harlow Road;
thence northwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the westerly extension of the south line of the
north half of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16, also being the south line of the
plat of Brentwood, Being Jas. W. Carr's Subdivision as recorded in Volume 4 of the book of plats, Page 84,
records of Kitsap County, Washington; thence easterly along said south line to the east line of the west halfof
the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence southerly along said east line to its intersection with the north
line of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence
easterly along said north line to the west line of the east 166.32 feet of the southwest quarter of the southeast
quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence southerly along said west line to the southerly right
of way of said Harlow Drive; thence easterly along said southerly right of way to its intersection with the west
line of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence
southerly along said west line to its intersection with the south line of said Section 16, also being the northwest
comer of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 21; thence continuing
southerly along the west line of said east half to the southwest corner of said east halt; thence easterly along the
south line of said east half to its intersection with the north-south centerline of said Section 16; thence southerly
along said centerline to its intersection with the south line of the north half of the northwest quarter of the
southwest qumier of the northeast quarter of said Section 16; thence easterly along said south line to its
intersection with the westerly right of way of Blumer Street, also being the northwest corner of the said Plat of
Leibly & Blumer's I st Addition to Bremerton Heights; thence southerly along said westerly right of way to its
intersection with the northerly right of way of said Werner Road; thence easterly along said nOliherly right of
way to its intersection with the extension of westerly right of way of Howe Street; thence southerly along said
extension and westerly right of way to the true point of beginning.
, ''"---"-' , \ \ '\ ,/ '" j / '! / \.' ~I '0, / ;-~) \ \\U i -/i/ -~?'~--
, \ '\ \ /, I! I, ,( J ,-...,-~ il.l; -' /
\ l ) \ ), J I / If J, l.\~~r I t \ ", ~../) _ _(__
\ "" ,/ BEACH 'I / \ " '~I I "I \ \ /"~ - --'t'-I
\ '\ \ " -r ( I" ; / \ \ - \ -" ,;! --;~4;;-=:c __ __
\ \ \ - I, \ I -I - I I I 'en' I : I J;< 'I I r-, ~ 1J---
\ \ - ~ ' I~ i II 1 '-:-' t];1~ :,r \ 1)(-\'.'\1\ )
" \ .-l):to \! r - ,- 1 - - e j-+ !' ,~y '-J
-' L,:- I :E <.n \ Ti r 'I 'oN 1- - ~>~:
~ \ \ I J." :..\ ), ( I 'I m /
~#~##~ Bremerton City Limit , \ I !0\ ~ \' :-,-1--//) ~ I _ "" ';
~ ~ 71 \\ \ ~- I ~\, ~ '\ ' l~<_jl ~ ~tt-- ,. _-:..::1 01 l/Ster
1 000 ,I r \ ~, \ \ t!J 1 '1 J'
' II \ / \ ..... \ \ L - 1- I - _ -----r-'----
I F t I \ - ..'\ ' I al- - - " \"l Bay
N ee, \ I j \ .., \ 1 or- \ --- \ \ - _-
-- II ',: I 1- - I/I! / / 71 J \J~ - \ \i--~r- ~ \- ~\ \:-~-~
- , I I!! /,', \p \ ' El-I-I- I - \'\ I u_
II I II -~- --r/ I ., --\ "Z..J! \\~ I !I
,--/ T' / / 7 ! I I r I I , II' r-' r T - - L , = '- ~ \ 1-- j -'-I '-'r _ \" "'-- /_____'
I~( ~L '---J / 'I" ~ ,) '---' ~'"i I t ~ '. I J I /, r:0-". \ ' WI J i \\
) /-~ 'I '^,,"', / ;';\ ) no', " I II / ~ / / i -'[::::\ \ \ ~ \ l,- I 1 1 I f"
"-,1 </ >- '-.( 1'--'1 ) ,--L-r'-I' fl-M0N~- --- - ~ / I / \ '-.. \ \, I J I~, / / 1_lj f,
I l_l~ \' ;',OSPR~EI- ~J I[ -I ----~-I---r....!~- - - If' I ~ " ' '-'-,_, \ ,\, --' L, i! /- ')/; I (~C-=_~ I
r]--l\, \/-j\--~rrr-/'l~ L~-~"- --=J I -1 I! "'---"'_ / r-n-',I'--L.-~(" ;d1;r q:__".1 I
tJ-~-'1;->(;~\!---lfr--=-! /--------j J : I L ~ff--\\ r.'I-'..~~*:t~N'
~<~/(:A\'lJ;'J j I "'~--- / JJ, q: /~=:'--"" "','~ '-. '--,,-U
I /, -- t- (J- I -- i -- T -- ----1 > e)-H,-,.J,c:.~, ~~r ~ ~ "j
\" --~~\ -J?{f--~7F---i-~ -~J-'--T'J~J~J-3~~~~~I~- III:::..// ~b--' =--"\~~ Vj~~~ \k '~---
\--t- ~l;\ - L[j- ') 1------)- -'--l [--t:::(5 -- :: ~Tp,f __n -J--.-11// i'" Q \ vl//'~ '\f~ /
\,), '\y- - -=-- .~---' I - -- ,I --- r---=--I-Z -----vo/----:1.!l '--~~c-l --TI T __ _ _ / /~~ '\ (,> \~ ',,\ __
>-!'r-.(<>--\),\_~ -j-I-- .~-~-,-rj',<x://C / 1- '--!5TAi-~~-CU-- ~ '"I, \/ \~~ \,
iJj,ll ill 'z \(Jb ...Ll~,.y I i IT J 1\\\ \ ;~-I':2:;;.} '\", 't \S\ \i
--~!c;,~!J,~CL-:~I-rr\;;~--__c. J "---rTE-C:(-L\lllr\~ II ~~\~~ ~""\h~)J
---om -- - -- II r --j-.~\' L__=-# 1-~-aL~' ),\~ ~ ";'> '-<Z
..... I \---\\ r ~ "I'-I~'A. /, , " ~~.
m i .L-~~=_~\----______T~_ .----. 1.__ I!--T T .'-___1 r q~yl:I.;1..---'\\ '\.., '\" 9:-.vv
Z i I I \ I rl -- -;J_ 1__ J I' rl' _ _ IJJ L 1_,_ z~ !1 ---\\/"" '\.." ~ ~~___
00 II ~ 1--'0:.1:;:-.., 1111 1f I 1-- - I II rtr -j LL ffi"-- ..J -) C:::';)\FyA 'OF'tf -----,
- II ~'(;. I ~w, "L v;" "t"J:l> " ^ '., -J
_M -_t7J)'.. llttl[~JTr~rl~~~~]~~o1e:I~~T{Jlt~\l
I / II I 'JfU IT m _. --'=~j I-J I i_ i_-~~I-r\:---~r"'-- -- ---L'- far --\\,JT! -",,- <\.-:::-
' I --1 --I "'P U I ----- --- ;'-- -- --- -- V,/ ~ ~ / I', "
CITYbF I I-I ;~~J---~J~~ I ~! 1- ~f((~
I , __J -- '-1-' ~ I J--e~ l-===- ( J<lu)'j 1!~ ~ Z-::.Il'" _, '
'1 BRrM~f-r9~-TI:IJ~' t--<l>rJ -=-~~ill-- ~-~T- '-. )~.e~~4thll:::~( ~~ !l):'l;
I I ILJ~__ J'__ -'--- -------r----- ~ ~j/ "'--f--'!",; ),~-Jf~r///~<
I i 1--.-' -- I 0 -- n:::-=f en r--:.-::-~--i :~- I ( / >-'~y/ - St: I /< '\
I II I 3: ---il - ~--r -II 1-- -iJ,--~. ~ I _ , / // \,,'\ I _ _1__/', I
I' " ...J ,-- -- , ,..u, I - '" / / / \ " I I I' I
" ! ...J - -, L -I, I - "_" L L__ _ ' '\ '\ I I
.L i-- - u I - --, 'f'--- - 0 1- . I--j---l., j __ " ~r--'I I n .__. -~ ---If /'" \,,_,LKEAN-- L__.
' I II Z I I. '.1 r 11 !--,Il Z' I---J, _1 III I '. \l'----r--'/T-T.r
I I ,'I I I l" , 'f' I '''' -- \ '~\ 1 I"
' I ili [--1_-,_1 !1-~;l;l- ZrL-,- TI---I i " '___\ \ I L ,t_,1
I I i, r',I, I,' 11- a:t--J['.::!)i---Lj-,! Ii !. !.. ,Ii \ --'!
- I;' -\ I ! II .1 Lu ,. In 11- ~!--jl~~'_~1 i--i I I' ~l'y1pNB,o,r;r~:l, \ J
i \ I III r C=-t~~- il- - II " I I I hlj' I 'Ij', \ \
.. .:-::!-,o-jJ - .[11_ J - .._____ r Ib ~t-_-Ilu 11' tL __ _ I I-I _. IFFrl':c"~f-'\ \ \, r
" ,.. , . , , --- c__ WERNER--- ---,- L-LI_L__L___I,)__ n_____.
-c:: -- i-r -- --'T--TTI-Irp--T-, TnT T -,- -1---<;'':'-111-- __
I, [ I ! Z!__ r!! .i/- L'I' I '- j II I, \ I
' , 'w, 1- I W j " \ ~
" , L I" I sf" I' "
II I i ref' I 1- -;,') I aU! II I! ~ "
III " -j I II. ,: .. ! ~- I I i
" , I L__ -~ I' I I.,'" " 'I ,I
,/ 111)1 I I illJI J 11//
I' 4:R ^ fir-Ie r ; 1 , li_ <:-I::~_
i !~: ,. -I'
'~i
/ EXHIBIT B
I West Hills Island
}_ Proposed Annexation Area
r
\,'
:;;, ~,~~:: i~::}>.:. ~:,,;~;-::
1_'/ {\~. -4/,/" ('I
,..... /L",,</?~"/ ]r~_ _"" ..f'/
. ~ :k;1j~ ~ ,--::~:;:: /-.: /l/ ( r ~ ,'; :
~~iFU:~~::'p'
'. ,. : ~ ' ".-..!
.~ .f:t?~.~' i. . , '1;'..;,'., OOOMJ.N311B
. -. . ~i.I-:i.i:~t~~; j' "
.,;~~~E.
/
"',:::~;::<~WN~,d.~\.\",;;>(;:'
.-. ._1 &"~! ,/ ")',___' \" I
~.Ji)l'! ~. /-"'" "
.' Ol: ~$/ ",
o +/
I.l.. ... /j'
~f/
). /
....
UlU y
Q:
,.~./
....i
. _. Cff
r:
-.;;.-!",/ / '
~r /'~
i,/:/ ,,:.<,~~"/ :~"-
/'\
( '\ '-.' i/ "
:7)' .;. ~o:/ ojo"'~~
b<....3 ,/ ciC,t:,
, ~ltl" .j ~->~, \ ,j
..' '. .~'
. . L' ilfr--
I'
i.
,~ ~.. '_ ~*'QrJ
...".... ~/ '
.- EO, ';!:'>;-- I
.CM,~,f.OR,":O.','<. ' ,.,... ~ I
>~>~,.J I "" ;]: ;';,,-,;,:-"-
,; \,:;;:\ ,~. ll-.i' E;:11 i !ij- Ii '~.
l' '.., 11<', ,....~., ,"";::.:!.:::l..l .1.1.1 I - ~
"~\~,~_"" Q." ",,,,,.\.I.! I. fl. / .! r'j-r-'-""H~" . ~
'lj' i "., ,'1 I ly,LI OJ I i j i, UJ ~5\l;
, . ~Aia!'r'i-'-'ir-:r"" ..L~. ..L.JJ.L ,~~~
i'F---'--'-'4 "p.;';' '-f.luJ'-~" Q: i i I .' .
l:i ~ ;..=~~.,~- i: f~W~ ~t-;tTlt5"rrrLrf+n..--;-1\fO'~';=C'
. ~ i . '''' '\ i'- ,,- .--- ,..~llll,::\ 'i~_j2'::lJILj"+,OI-.J J..' i -." '
:l! I \\L~ /,,";. 1';'''S!:lN''lI,j''T''!-'-l'''~.JLr1I! ilJlllJ 1/ rlr'] ..-{! ! I
! ) ,', .;.II 1'----i.'~J tj \ \ I i #...1..'! ' ,. , ,,,j,. .". , ,..,;::~::.; /' I I'
E r" 1'_ __ l J T ....\.., ,/^ 1, ~..,' 'i f ' , ' , f'" 1 L.
"I c::; l I ~.~.;..-: !..:" fil 01'-'\) L",,"\" 0). I.... "'" ;"1 :':1-1; :'+1 C;:-=! i -T'---"j
~ ,i!;' ... ,_"".., I ,I: ' ..... '-'j "i' 1.'/ ~ ~-1.' --.-.,.../dl ' L I '. r !, ..' .'.
, U N ::::...z--~- ,I~.i ~_! II I. \ ( \."-'f.,..Lil-" -f;,{ : : .........- --r- _.....__L.....~r t! !
i!:: g 0 fO ~' :~:5i1V\f~~ L, ~--~.]JIIJ]lL.!d,;~rj.;\\-.L..r-. "'. r:=:; ~ I :...1 r'l1]])
o m ~ ~"'!iS" ~ c'~' .. """lIdl/o' '-".c., I ' /' \ .- --"="'-r'~'''' --"f"'~'lA. .... ' ,;....)1 i , I :1
h: ~ [~, ~_ -_~~~;~:'[[:3~S'~~'- _ . ~ ili -'-r~""-')i--,--
1 ~ / --]z !,,,}l i~~j,~s;f,~ffif ".... -" o~:, c~4
...1'- _,.,~' i '
;,_1.t.;_L~1Yr[-~) ._;~~ r:::"-:2:.";~",--.lr'-\-7 /' --;./ 1/
'11 rr.''-)~J(<'/ ~\ g"-'J<:::-iC1' / _.~-!' ,// / //';- '~y'\fWN~.j'klW ,l!7-::-:.~>-"-i
'I ",'; \f+-'>.$I"~ I """""1! '?' '_~~Vl ,/ L:;<' "'." '7~''\ /~/' ,i,i3L I
~jif/\':~Z///I."'{'-J'T'\-(' .:{"" /!I ..,,'t~/ / Y ,/' ,</f-' '--; f\." // y- &11"11"'1'
.."""fi;t.---~..\ /, (..T-.....,.. ! ',__"'~ ! ,II ,// // / 'Vi'" I I, ^ /V,. , 0" 'W
;~~---:-l-( : i I i1 . V'I _i I I'.....; Ij ~/ ~ ",y ./ \ /'/ ;--~~..~-- 1/;' ,...-/,\ ) IX 1
___'-'-" '\" ,I' , I' j"'1 i i }_,. J ! \\ '-/"'" / /\ // ;--;-- 9~...._j IY~"" ", I Z 1 I
r ;m~F:~\ V",!.i 1 ;:_;_~ ,:__i i <' ,-.'10:,::::':" /! \\, (~ __~....I / ~...-/ !. I I -~"b'";.'~ I; '. j- J_ 0 II-~.
/ .V"'.' ,/.,,' ,., ,. '!- ~09 1 ) , ~ ' / ojo"ff . '\ "" Ol: '.~> '-., ~ ",2\,o::1t-
'i-'-:i:J'::~':i,!;':I.:::;j;:.;;,";, , ' I L ,- " ~""~&'Itt : ! ,/ ~...O~t:'" ,11,' -'0 $,/ ',i .,..,.'=.,
/ ~;<[)\: :: I 'H" ',.:,-! I.J .. ,-,' ,P'/, \;: ,-,~!. :1.l..J.;.(j/ /
~:.r~,~~..,.i,.. 11,11':.._;1! "', //) ~ ~ ~I~'
.~---r"t f~~--' ,;,".'", I ,I -~'" "/-. "'1' .~/ ".(jf"::" ,,; J!'-i''''''' ,/ /
:z -V>k.J l~..l_ ,L I.... --W/ 0, OOMJ.H~> ~ ~ ! ~ ~ I, /'
- I I I;" / ,,', I ~, " "'-
....... _'_.\. I" 1111" I' I .__~>/' .. "', '~.).. ;:> ,._,11 ,'.
,r------- . "r-,~.l_-t-'ClI ,.-....., J...._J."fl '1 f r\. Qf~--. ~ ' ..... lU ~ ,.~ /
.;;<, ri.,U.1.J~_j:r.'--;;b'" ,../ (^.... C'" ---. /,' , NNa~". -=f'::::'-' U /'
/"0"; /'l.: il';Y 11') r 1_; .'~! ovi;'Q,z::~1 i ~J ,I !]!:- Q: /'
,j-:>-.!..II ',.)// ~~'tE.~ ".,I..f !~-...~~.lt:::""i ;--,:] ,.IL..~, a:l
-.51.>;"""; --T' 'r~ .;/ '<<If/ r:~f:c}1 1=:1 L2f/1 -.--"'.- '''.
_CRAWFOiO\, -1 : ,.J/'~" /:"-..:~.>"", r'rt:J~=~':"~Y/ ~ !
\ L(.\,'j.!~I:.~:~\~.~';;rr'I'=.' u :=ll .. r ; ,::;d t;:,:Jj I Ii I i I
.' "!or! "" c=,;~:"L.;,..1J...L i '["-,J I f
... .' 11<"1 ,\}".".. ....I..J.
/~1";"'::i" , Q. -, ,\ " : i! I'T-"-I"f""''''11Ik'(
r -~-~t ... E!~ . /";.,:t.i.',,"l";'-~"Ilt,, I,' l L fJ
! :1 i k :-' ,L~'~",i~:,l.~,~~'.",
.IE ! ".;.Ii ! I ...
I .::; I ~r ',' ,i,,!
.j (,) _ 1 I 'in
'j ~ f' rrJi;~~INrt~roi~,::(;\' r ,
'4 >< ,., ,,", ll.;' ,',i""dl,.r .,:':-/":" f\"'~!': SERENO CIRCLE
,) W / -12 r~~; ::j ">~~::;~'~:~~>~::::t7t:~lJ~e'
;U" ,
~
.., 0
1.l..J.;.
OQ:
~~
-U,j
UQ:
a:l
aOOMllONF
, I
..,j,'o;,'='
"'"
'-
""'6P=
"'"
.J
;'h "".....-,.,
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 3 D 2- 3
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton, Washington, initiating the annexation of certain lands
comprising approximately 171 acres in the West Hills area of West
Bremerton situated within an island of unincorporated Kitsap
County territory that is completely encompassed by City of
Bremerton jurisdiction, more particularly described in Exhibit A;
and declaring Notice of Intent to Annex said territory; and setting a
date for a public hearing on the resolution.
vVl-IEREAS, RCW 35.13.182 provides for an abbreviated procedure to annex
unincorporated islands of property having at least 80% of the boundaries of such area contiguous
to the city, initiated by City Council Resolution; and
WHEREAS, City Council seeks to annex territories within City of Bremerton
Urban Growth Areas that contribute to the overall economic and social health and well being of
the City and lead to an orderly and logical pattern of development; and
WHEREAS, the proposed area for annexation is legally described and further
depicted in Exhibit A, legal description and Exhibit B, map, attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the proposed area for annexation is located within the City's Urban
Growth Area (UGA) and in completely encompassed by the City; and
WHEREAS, the land use designations previously established by the City for the
proposed area for annexation are Low Density Residential (LDR) and Industrial (I) as depicted
on the City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.13.1822, a public hearing will be held on the
proposed mmexation on March 21, 2007 at 5:30 PM during the regular City of Bremerton City
Council meeting and all statutory notice and publication requirements for the public hearing shall
be met prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton estimates that there are approximately 325
voters residing in the area, and this estimate is prepared based on the number of housing units
located in the area proposed for annexation; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton will file a Notice of Intent to Annex document
with the Kitsap County Boundary Review Board (ERE) immediately following the passage of
this Resolution; and
>>,'est Hills Island Annexation
WHEREAS, City of Bremerton staffwill present to City Council an analysis of
the costs and benefits and the anticipated fiscal impacts to the CiTY of annexing the \Vest Hills
Island prior to the City Council's consideration of whether to approve the annexation; and
'vVHEREAS, City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City to initiate
the proposed annexation as presented, require the simultaneous adoption of the comprehensive
plan for the area proposed to be mmexed and require the assumption of all or any portion of City
indebtedness by the area to be annexed; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLO\VS:
SECTION 1. City Council hereby initiates annexation proceedings as pursuant
to RCW 35.13.182 for the territory included in the West Hills Island as legally described in
Exhibit A, and mapped in Exhibit B, attached hereto.
SECTION 2. City Council sets March 21, 2007 as the date for a public hearing
on the proposed annexation.
SECTION 3. City Council shall require the simultaneous adoption of the
comprehensive plan land use designations ofLDR and I as previously established by the City for
this area in the UGA for the proposed annexation area.
SECTION 4. The City Council shall require the assumption of all existing City
indebtedness by the area to be annexed.
SECTION 5. The City shall submit an Intent to AImex as required by law to the
Kitsap Boundary Review Board (BRB).
SECTION 6. Severabilitv. If anyone or more sections, subsections, or
sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton, 'vVashington this~
day of\ ~.(~ y ,2007.
A /. //O--~
/ ;%UZf///C~ /':D
WILL MAlTP~, CounctfPresident
2
1Fest Hills Island j-'iJl11 exatioJ1
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTES.!: /~l ,
/) (.' ./.
/1t:~~
LPAULA J9jfNSTON, City Clerk
II
R:\Legal\Legal\Files\Current Active Files\l~lU1exation - West Hills Island\Initiation Resolution.doc
.~~. ~
.......
3
West Hills Island Annexation
Exhibit A
Legal Description
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR \VEST HILLS ISLAND ANNEXATION
Those portions of Sections 16 and 21, Township 24 North, Range 1 East, W.M., described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of the Plat of Leibly & Blumer's 1 sl Addition to Bremerton Heights, as
recorded in Volume 3 of the book of plats, Page 89, records of Kit sap County, Washington, also being a point
on the east-west centerline of said Section 21, also being on the westerly right of way of Howe Street and the
True Point of Beginning; thence westerly along said centerline to the east line of the southwest quarter of the
northwest quarter of said Section 21; thence northerly along said east line to its intersection with the northerly
right of way for Wemer Road; thence westerly along said northerly right of way to its intersection with the
westerly right of way of Ida Street (formerly Maple Street); thence northerly along said westerly right of way to
its intersection with the southerly right of way for Rogers Street; thence westerly along said southerly right of
way to its intersection with the westerly right of way of Broad Street; thence northerly along said westerly right
of way to its intersection with the north line of said Section 21; thence westerly along said north line to its
intersection with the easterly right of way of Tweed Lane; thence northeasterly along said easterly right of way
to its intersection with a line 150 feet south of and parallel to the north Jine of the southwest quarter of the
southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence westerly along said line to its intersection
with the west line of said Section 16; thence northerly along said west line to its intersection with the centerline
of Price Road; thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline ofRarlow Road;
thence northwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the westerly extension of the south line of the
north half of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16, also being the south line of the
plat of Brentwood, Being Jas. W. Carr's Subdivision as recorded in Volume 4 of the book of plats, Page 84,
records of Kitsap County, Washington; thence easterly along said south line to the east line of the west half of
the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence southerly along said east line to its intersection with the north
line of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence
easterly along said north line to the west line of the east 166.32 feet ofthe southwest quarter of the southeast
quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence southerly along said west line to the southerly right
of way of said Harlow Drive; thence easterly along said southerly right of way to its intersection with the west
line of the southeast quarter ofthe southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of said Section 16; thence
southerly along said west line to its intersection with the south line of said Section 16, also being the northwest
comer of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 21; thence continuing
southerly along the west line of said east halfto the southwest corner of said east half; thence easterly along the
south line of said east half to its intersection with the north-south centerline of said Section 16; thence southerly
along said centerline to its intersection with the south line of the north half of the northwest quarter of the
southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 16; thence easterly along said south line to its
intersection with the westerly right of way of Blumer Street, also being the northwest comer of the said Plat of
Leibly & Blumer's 1 5t Addition to Bremerton Heights; thence southerly along said westerly right of way to its
intersection with the northerly right of way of said Werner Road; thence easterly along said northerly right of
way to its intersection with the extension of westerly right of way of Howe Street; thence southerly along said
extension and westerly right of way to the true point of beginning.
4
"Vest Hills Island A.lll1exatioll
r
EXH~BiT B
West Hills Island
proposed Annexation Area
-~--------------_.__.-
BEACH
L\
N
1,000
o
:D
~
~
-n
o
::0
o
~
~"
~
-:;.
.L.
til
CJj
:::i:
o
:0
m
:E
0:
o
o
"'"
....,''It
,
Bremenon Cill' L.lmit
Cl
o
'1i.
\...-:", ,0
"'~ 3=n
\ 1" 1-0-, I -
.~ i ! "0 z. , -,-,
;:-(: i l; , W :','1,
: \~.' I 0:' I, ;
j -- vvlLMONT en . , '
. . . r--; - Ii!
1 ./ i~.:i I
. , " " .. !< "/ .'0'
, :.' '; / i . ",' ',' '. I '~.: : .Jf
~ ". 'CJ)
h{ :" Ie i'i-;' i ! .. ,J~ -] >- :!: h-ft if \ :.1 ..~
i \ '.1 ',,' I ...., I. j f ; f i IT' i 'iEi--1 .~i I' I' . /'--" '''L,'_~~\ .:v",. \',' ',. ,
'\--\'-1""/ \;",,.:.,..-, .!..j I ..f: __, _'j 1__,1 ~L,- tO~'l'l-J'~ 1.1. ,. o'/ ,i ".,~1 -\1.
. -". ./ "('\ .., 1 I J I ,I!, 11-. ,"'" ' 'Ill.. n., , ~ I,." \ '
.,\ J I '\1', -"-= :',./ .1; _,L -, --~:Z;.=r 8~--r- . iil ! t. Q ~.,;;)"" 'f!9..
f~ .- ./\,'.\ 1 r ! i .. ,_.J r ~I-, "0 ,'" : .' '(j:..rT1.d'i {'T)1'~/'~ (I,,/',~ '('k
.~ / i r : : n'i):.- ',:,<')1 ! _ : 'j'! fE' , ,,'~,LO ,-:':' 1 ~:~~<~}. ~,... ~ ,~, ,
----.PRJ6/. f . i' \.' I " IT. '--, . I ,--..J f _J; ,! \ \ \) I(/) I' ". >:.~ ',\ \~ \\,
-~'<'~'~~'--~'~;>:I T-1'::\--~ ;' I i _i.r..j.J .i \)1'1\9 I :\,"~..,' ;. ::,\ _' .))
:IJ i . '~ -'I:. I -;u f~L, .." "-
m ' LJ. - ~ , 1:- .: _. I' '1Y~W.L'- \, ',' '-;',~,
5 r-i--(;........Ii! I-Cl_f ..: I ! I" i 'Zl '~/..--l.:-:: _. ~'v.'V
C"> ~'r"" . II I i- Ii" I! ;-.--''-1' ~.' " ~"
55 '~-A'<;! ':ri'~.I,~J i. I:' "/' L.~L__.f ~.-i; I -, ..~.: I' ern,.,.".....)- 'O.,.F t::J<</ .
C"> 11~..i i-'ii' r~,l/,,'/I'i '-,---': I .Jr T ._
ii --"T' J' 'I:~~..I 'i f-!:-:.~c:::;-i' ~i 'II! II ',,~ ,~ B " . .
i"m Il, . r' Lrl J ~ I' : t-i~~'l!_J, -\'--:-
: "--'I',1S' _1.1'1':1: Li'-' '-11'/' \', ntA- ".-- R~McRTON'i
::-1 ~~ !i! I' -'\, .
;~ 'I-I~ ---,,,, ,-, i I'i' .. --:":--~= ~ -~-1ST--o----=- r.
! / c -:L_!' ~- ==-:t'Jl, ~--~~' --.;,;r----.-/r-ID;.-.::',- n~:-
"I t' ::: 1- J: re'-I'i _.- I! 41, '/"~! ",Z/ I,:.
CITY OF i r-- I ,-:-Th 1-0 .c t-- I.\, ~/ /-' ii-/',lC( / '--
1-I-BR1=MElRrQ/ll,N "l L!I--I~IJ ,[~~rl'-~,II:' --rLc-_.9-~ji~~__'_'-___- \\"~(/~ :i /,/-") ~>>~:<( ,
1 "Ir~ 11 0 r-- - I ~l L ~ , /?o.oS,A. //'>,,> i,-m',I/ //,>,.
I' I' I I, - LI"S____.--....L,- _ ,'- ,I. _ 1 ' .-. 1"- --,"/ /1 "~" ''''.,.b-i- ><: ~I r-' -/ o''-;' ,,'
r \wi ", ,I,.' ...'._..~~. ._~..:~.., \, ~ ./ ///~/>,.., r
~ :- 'j /' -~, .-:- ~J ~ ' /"'...< ...t;-- ", /,..!... /
I >1""! ; "///,'
i ..J r :-.1 11 /" r" -iJ..,. ~'.'.. ,/ /,', ~,' '.',V
I ' . 'r-"/ . I ~ 1 .
I ..J,.. ,.... r ' ~ '" '" ;-. J I I
, II! ~ .1 I, il j . I: J; ~ji I:. . .ir!~Kr4~Ju
ii' Q: J ::> ' I , " , -', '; : " I
) ! ' ' :--I~, Cff - ' i ' i ! ". \ . . J
" j . ; ': <t, :' , 'I\~O' N ;
'!i ~ ~~ iC' -u: II: I lV':', ROE- I
; I: ~~' 1,' ',' " - , : 1,- ,UL,'_,-' _'_, . ~ c..i 'r!; i-
. I I '! I
-~'-.. ',- '_ --,--WERNER -. L! LL
m'~' ~ 'T' r--;- ~... ,-
o 1 ~
W
O.
j -:;
I Feet
. r .~ .
Oyster
Bay
1 i
, '
,.' ~sp.Rdy
l,
" i '
I : : '
1\' i
; i'<_
')_; i i
, ,; I !
. ~. .!. . J
/.
....J _
~:,
jp
J4
<~'-"
f
I. I __ ~ .
f"
"
!'
i
I
_~; ,f
I ~ ,I
~,' I
------.---~_._ __lJ
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council
From: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Date: March 16, 2007
Re: West Hills Island Annexation - Land Use Assumptions
This is to explain how the Annexation Report and Cost / Benefit analysis for the West Hills Island Annexation
would change if land use assumptions were shifted to reflect less industrial along Werner Rd. and more
residential per the discussion at the study session on March 14,2007. Adjustments are described in a general
way since the overall magnitude of cost / benefit would not change dramatically based on the revised
assumptions.
Existing Buildout Analysis - 2007
There would be no change to either the operating costs / revenues or the one-time costs / revenues for the initial
year 2007. This is because in the start year calculations are based on existing land uses and structures in the
area. Land use assumptions do not have an impact on the initial year analysis.
Buildout - 2027, Operating Costs
Changes occur to several cost / revenue items under Operating Costs for the buildout year. Please refer to page
11-3 to consider the impact of these adjustments. Buildout assumptions would shift projected land uses by
decreasing the number of projected industrial businesses by about 10-15, and increasing the number of
residential housing units by 75 - 125.
· Sanitary Sewer: Projected Sanitary Sewer Costs / Revenue would remain about the same or even
improve the cost / revenue balance for both operating and one time costs by a small percentage. While
commercial sewer usage rates (operating) and GFC charges (one-time) are about twice the residential
ones, the greater residential density would offset or outstrip.
· Potable Water: Projected Potable Water Costs / Revenue would remain about the same or even
improve the cost / revenue balance for both operating and one time costs by a small percentage. While
commercial water usage rates (operating) and GFC charges (one-time) are greater than the residential
ones, the higher residential density would offset or outstrip.
· Transportation: No Change. The mileage and roadway projection would not change.
· Storm: No Change to capital improvements (one-time) costs on stormwater, since the mileage of storm
upgrades would be the same. However, a decrease in the operating revenues generated by stormsewer
usage would occur. Industrial users generate storm usage charges substantially higher than residential
uses due to the larger amount of impervious surface. It is expected that revenues from stormsewer
usage would decrease by approximately $15K annually at buildout.
· Fire & EMS: Since the amount of residences in the area would increase, the demand for fire services
would increase. However, Fire / EMS has budgeted amply (3 additional firefighters) to cover the demand
for service in this area in the existing projection. The increased residential buildout of 75 - 125 units
beyond the original projection would not trigger need for an additional firefighter beyond what is already
budgeted. No change.
· Police: Since the amount of residences in the area would increase, the demand for police services
would increase. Police services are generally calculated on a per person basis. (2 officers per thousand
standard.) Both police operating and one-time costs as shown in the study would increase by 25% to
50% ($13K - $26K annual operating, $1,800 - $3,600 one-time).
· Revenues: Tax revenues would decrease or stay about the same. With less industrial buildout tax
revenues projected would decrease by about $75K annually. This includes loss of B&O and sales tax.
Property and other taxes from increased residential buildout would be in the range of $45K - $75K
annually. So a proportionately small overall tax revenue decrease could be expected.
Summary
Based on these generalized adjustments, we do not expect any significant change in the
overall cost revenue picture with revisions to the land use assumptions. The 2007
calculations are the same. While there are several adjustments within the 2027 buildout,
these adjustments tend to be roughly offset.
. Page 2
en
.... .-
.. en
o ~
a..-
~ ~
C D::cc
o"ca....
.... C ~ .-
..ca......
~-A CLt
een......c
- c ~
~enom
.. -- .-
m -- ............ .....
... i cu... 0
o~=~ ~
~~ 2(.) ~
City of Bremerton
West Hills Island
Annexation Report &
Cost I Benefit Analysis
March, 2007
Prepared for Council Review in advance of the March
21,2007 Public Hearing on annexation by the abbrevi-
ated island annexation method.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Area Background
1-1 Location, Growth Planning Status
1-2 Existing and Projected Buildout
1-4 Analysis & Existing Conditions
1-6 City & County Land Use Designations
1-7 Existing Utilities
II. Executive Summary of Costs I Benefits
11-1 Cost / Benefit Structure
1-2 Ongoing Annual; One-Time Costs / Revenues
11-3 Compiled Summary Costs / Benefits
III. Service-By-Service Costs I Benefits
111-1 Urban Service Delivery
111-2 Revenues
111-4 Sanitary Sewer
111-6 Potable Water
111-8 Transportation
111-10 Storm Sewer
111-12 Fire / EMS
111-14 Public Safety
/
I. AREA BACKGROUND
West Hills Annexation Area Report
March, 2007
Location
The West Hills Island is located in the hilly area to the
west of Bremerton's Auto Center district. The West
Hills annexation area is accessed via Werner Rd,
where Werner Rd passes through the southern portion
of the annexation area. Sunnyhill Rd. runs north I
south through the center of the area. Maps, existing
conditions and current and future build out of the
annexation area are included in this Chapter.
Growth Planning Status
The annexation area is entirely within the current City of
Bremerton associated Urban Growth Area (UGA). The
annexation area is entirely surrounded by City of
Bremerton jurisdiction. Because it is an 'island'
completely surrounded by Bremerton, it may be
annexed at any time using an abbreviated annexation
method initiated by City Council resolution. By
including the area within the UGA at the time of the
City's 2004 Comprehensive Plan, the City made a
committment to annex this area during the 20 year time
horizon of the Plan, and evaluated its ability to provide
the full range of urban services from a capacity
standpoint.
West Hills Island Annexation Report
Vicinity. West Hills lyland in Black.
Werner Rd. is the main arterial access to the
West Hills Island.
1-1
General Annexation Discussion
In 2006 and 2007, the Bremerton City Council
included progress on annexation as an important
priority. The West Hills Island is a clear choice for
annexation because it is highly integrated with the
City of Bremerton. Bremerton already provides
water service and sewer service to some or all of
the island and the area is surrounded by City of
Bremerton. For these and other reasons it is appro-
priate for Bremerton to pursue annexation of the
West Hills Island at this time.
A map of the proposed annexation area is shown at
right. The boundary of the annexation area is the
thick black line.
Existing and Future Buildout
The table below summarizes the existing conditions and
the projected 20 year buildout of the West Hills Island.
The area totals 171 acres. There are currently about 237
dwelling units and 509 people living in the area, and one
sizeable manufacturing business in the area along
Werner Rd.
Current City of Bremerton land use designations (see
page 1-6) are for Industrial uses in the Werner Rd.
corrdior. However, some of this land is being used as
single family residential. Based on these designations
the projection shows a transition of lands in that corridor
to commercial! industrial over time, with a total of 17
businesses in the corridor. Some infill residential
redevelopment is projected, but the total number of
housing units goes down slightly due to conversion to
commercial! industry in the Werner Rd. corridor. Total
assessed value increases from about $36M to $41 M
over the 20 year period due to infill and redevelopment.
West Hills Island
Proposed Annexation Area
Existing Buildout Summary 2007 Existing 2027 Future Buildout
Total Acres (Includes ROW) 171 171
Total Assessed Value (2007) $36,353,410 $41,624,400
Residential
Acres: Low Density Residential Designated 95 95
Estimated Dwelling Units 207 174
Estimated Total Residential Population 509 428
Brem. Water Customers 207 174
Brem. Sewer Customers 35 174
Commercial
Acres: Industrial Designation 57 57
Estimated # Business Uses 1 17
Brem. Water Customers 1 17
Brem. Sewer Customers 1 17
Acres: Vacant I Undeveloped 32 0
Notes: Notes:
1. Source: County Assessor 1. Res. Infill assumed on lots> 12,500
2. Industrial Lands include res. units 2. 40% res. reduction due to rugged / sensitive conditions
3. Infill assumed on vacant lands
4. Transition of res. uses on industrial lands to industrial assumed
5. Ind. Bus. Assumed at .3/ acre consistent with existing
6. Future hookups of res units to sewer assumed
7. Future residential bldg. val. Assumed @ 185% exs!. Avg.
a.Future industrial bldg. val. Assumed
1-2
March, 2007
West Hills Island
Annexation Area
West Hills Island Annexation Report
1-3
West Hills Island
Annexation Area
Analysis & Existing Conditions
W"h. "<
"W,. h""'rn'''fI7)n Ll'l)11',
'~I -,~ H<<"<,, ,
0.25
Miles
.....
IVldl vii, It.VV I
These units in the Dorothy I F rands I Hazel section of
the area are similar to many West Bremerton homes.
Broad St. and other residential roadways are rural in
character without curb and gutter.
Werner Rd. is the primary arterial access to the area.
Werner Rd. carries high volumes of truck traffic to the
industrial area to the West.
West Hills Island Annexation Report
Several larger, older homes are on Sunnyhill Rd. and
other locations within the area.
The Ex One manufacturing plant is a sizeable existing
business in the area.
The West Hills Baptist Church is located in the area
along Werner Rd.
1-5
City of Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan land Use
City Land Use Designations
The 2004 City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan land
use designations are shown for the area in the figure
above. These are not the same as the newly adopted
County Comprehensive Plan designations. Bremerton
shows industrial lands along the Werner corridor. All
other lands within the area are shown as Low Density
Residential (LOR) consistent with the city's policy to
concentrate new multifamily uses in Center districts
that are close to services.
Following or concurrent with the annexation process,
the City should review the land use designations to
ensure they are appropriate and acceptable to
residents. In particular, the City should review the
industrial designation along Werner Rd. to refine it
based on input from residents and property owners.
1-6
Kitsap County
Comprehensive Plan land Use
County Land Use Designations
The 2006 Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan land use
designation are shown for area in the figure above.
These are not the same as the City's Comprehensive
Plan designations. The County shows residential
along the bulk of the Werner Rd. corridor. The County
also shows a pocket of Medium I High Density
Multifamily (M/H Res.) in the western half of the area.
The City did not approve of that multi-family designa-
tion during the County 10-year update.
March, 2007
. :1"0,>'
; "-":.".- -,:
..... ".< Oyster'
'B.ay' '.'
. .'{
'",
"\.
',.
"
Existing Water Infrastructure
Existing Sewer Infrastructure
The figure above shows City of Bremerton Water and
Sewer mains within the annexation area. City water
mains (shown in blue) are present throughout the area,
including the smaller residential streets. Current water
coverage is well developed.
The figure above shows City of Bremerton Water and
Sewer mains within the annexation area. City sewer
mains (shown in brown) are located only within the
Werner Rd. corridor in the southern third of the annex-
ation area. All other residential portions of the study
area are on septic systems. It is anticipated that at
some future time sewer line extensions could occur in
a north I south direction through the area.
West Hills Island Annexation Report
1-7
Page left intentionally blank.
1-8
March, 2007
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COSTS I BENEFITS
West Hills Annexation Area Report
March, 2007
Cost / Benefit Structure
This Section summarizes the overall cost I benefit
picture of annexing the West Hills Island. The analysis
reviews an initial year (2007) and a 20 year buildout
year (2027). This allows for consideration of the
immediate financial impacts on the City, as well as the
long term financial impacts on the City.
Costs and Benefits are summarized into Operating or
ongoing annual costs and one-time capital costs or
revenues. This allows for consideration of the annual
budgetary impacts, as well as the impacts to the City's
Capital improvement budget.
Concept Level Study
It is important to note that this study is a 'thumbnail'
concept level study. Costs and revenues are for a
general financial picture only, and to review for any
major potential costs or revenue impacts to the City.
Cost estimating and revenue projections are based on
rough data only and should be considered with this in
mind.
West Hills Island Annexation Report
11-1
Cost I Benefit Executive Summary
Ongoing Annual Revenues
Operating Costs / Revenues are 'year-aver-year'
costs and revenues.
Existing 2007 - Initially the City will incur net cost
impacts totalling $190,037 on the operating budget.
The greatest cost impacts are in the areas of Fire /
EMS service ($231,834) and Police ($52,211). Both
Fire and Police will begin staff increases to satisfy
increased demand as part of a greater picture of
increased demand with new development in the
vicinity, potential annexation of Navy Yard City, and
potential growth at SKIA. A proportionate share of
the staff ramping costs is assigned to the West Hills
Island. Initial sewer and water 'costs' are due to rate
revenue decreases that will occur as existing
customers in the County cease to pay the out-of-city
surcharge. Transportation costs are associated with
routine maintenance and upkeep of roadways in the
area.
Tax revenues will initially total approximately
$135,037 on an annual basis. This does not include
B&O taxes on businesses, since the city recently
took action to provide a 3 year exemption whereby
no B&O tax is collected for the first 3 years. The
bulk of revenue income is from property taxes on
residences.
Buildout 2027 - Over the 20 year horizon the annual
financial picture of the annexation improves dramati-
cally to a revenue surplus of $405,824 annually.
Stormwater assessment revenue increase signifi-
cantly as underutilized lots are converted to com-
mercial/ industrial uses. Cost balances for sewer
and water improve as new ratepayers are added to
the system. The cost of providing Fire and Police
does not change over the timeframe after the initial
investment is made.
Annual tax revenues increase to $192,042 as new
commercial/ industrial uses are created, yielding
some B&O and other taxes. Increased taxbase is
also attributable to some residential lots redevelop-
ing.
11-2
One- Time Revenues
One-time revenues are capital costs or receipts that
happen once and are not ongoing. In the computation
2027 buildout, one-time costs / revenues are cumulative
over the 20 year period as costs and improvements will
happen in different years over time.
Existing 2007 - The only immediate direct cost with
annexing West Hills is the proportionate share of new
Police Vehicles assigned to the West Hills Island. The
Police Department will purchase a total of six new
vehicles to service increased demands in the greater
vicinity. This accounts for the 2007 initial capital cost of
$7,200.
Buildout 2027 - Over the 20 year period a relatively
small cost balance of $133,868 will be incurred. This is
a minor number considering that costs are spread over
20 years. The most substantial cost items are associ-
ated with roadway upgrades and stormwater system
upgrades in the area. These improvements would be
paid for primarily by development and Local Improve-
ment District (LID) with only a portion of the improvement
cost being realized by the City. Sewer extension and
upgrades would also be achieved through cost-sharing
with development and / or LID. The cost of providing
sewer and water services are also balanced by Gross
Facility Charges (GFCs) that will be collected as new
hookups occur.
One time revenues of $137,806 are the result of one
time taxes and fees on items such as construction and
real estate excise taxes.
March, 2007
West Hills Island Annexation
Compiled Summary - Costs & Benefits
Change in Operating Cost I RevenUles
Existing - 2007 Buildout - 2027
______~~~~C______________________(~~~?_~~l_____________~j_~~~j_~:!_______
______~~t~_~!~_~~!~C__________J_~~~_~~_l~l_____________l~_12:~~~~l______
______JC~~Q~~~_~~!~~!J__________J_~;!Q_~~~9_l_____________l~~~~~~~L______
______~!~J[QJ_______________________~_~_~L~9_~______________~~_~_1~;?_~_~_______
______f:~~_~_~~~______________(~~~~2_~~~)___________JC~~~J2_~~~_L_____
______~~U~~______________________J_~~?_~~_1j_L_____________(~~~~~_1j_l______
------~~y-~!!y-~-~----------------~~-~~~~-~:!_------------~j-~~~~-~~-------
Balance I Total
$405,824
Balance One-Time Cost Revenue Impacts
Existing - 2007 Buildout - 2027
______~~~~C__________________________~_Q__________________J_~_l~~~~~l______
______~~t~_~!~_~_~!~_C_______________~_Q__________________~~_1~L~_9_~_______
. ______JC~~_Q~~~_~~!~~_Q_______________~_Q__________________(~~~92~~Q_l_____
.______~!~CQJ____________________________~__________________($~}_Q2_~~9_L_____
______f:~~_~_~~~____________________~_______________________~_9____________
______~~U~~_______________________S_~2:~?_Q~l______________J~~~?_Q~l_______
______~~y_~!!y_~_~_____________________~_Q__________________~j_~~~~_9_~_______
Balance I Total
West Hills Island Annexation Report
11-3
Page left intentionally blank.
11-4
March, 2007
III. SERVICE-BY-SERVICE COSTS I BENEFITS
West Hills Annexation Area Report
March, 2007
Urban Service Delivery
This Section details the costs of providing urban
services to the West Hills Island. The costs and
revenues associated with providing each individual
urban service are tabulated separately. (See Execu-
tive Summary for compilation.) A brief narrative on the
urban service and any unique delivery challenges are
provided for each service.
Urban services provided directly by the City of
Bremerton for the West Hills area upon annexation are
as follows:
· Sanitary Sewer - Public Works & Utilities
. Potable Water - Public Works & Utilities
· Storm Sewer - Public Works & Utilities
. Transportation (roads) - Public Works & Utilities
. Public Safety - Bremerton Police Department
· Fire & EMS - Bremerton Fire Department
. Other I Misc. - Parks + Code Enforcment Etc.
In addition, this section includes a summary of the
revenue consequences from taxes and fees that
would be gained by the City upon annexation of the
West Hills Island.
As explained in the Executive Summary, costs and
revenue are tabulated for an initial year (2007) and a
20 year buildout year (2027). Capital costs for the
2027 year are cumulative in that all capital costs
"incurred over the 20 year timeframe are aggregated to
2027.
West Hills Island Annexation Report
111-1
111.2 Revenues
Ongoing Annual Revenues
Ongoing general taxation revenues come from
several sources. The largest single source of
ongoing revenue is from property taxes. The City's
2007 tax levy per $1,000 of assessed value is
$2.451212. Other tax revenues are from utility taxes,
and state population distribution taxes. Minor tax
revenue sources are business 8&0 and sales
taxes, though these grow over the 20 year period as
more business develops in the Werner Rd. indus-
trial corridor.
In the initial year $135,474 of new revenue is
recieved. This grows to $210,308 in 2027. In-
creases are due to rising assessed values of
properties and growth in 8&0 and sales taxes.
111-2
One Time Revenues
There are several one-time revenues received over the
20 year period: real estate excise taxes, sales and use
taxes on the construction of new units, and 8&0 tax on
construction of new units. Total one-time receipts are
approximately $138,000.
March, 2007
WEST HILLS ISLAND ANNEXATION
General Fund/General Capital Improvement Fund - Revenue Impacts
Department: FINANCIAL SERVICES
2007 - Annexing Existing
Buildout Scenario (2027)
Note #
Ongoing Revenues (Annual)
.E'Lq,e~J!Y..I~~U;.~y.x.:_B~.9.\!!~!Ltt<21L~LlJ.g_y',[11L____________m____nmm
.~_@!Y_T.?~~_~I:Lq\!~J!1..9_~_QiL____________________________________m__m
_E'_~[_<.;:.?.[>i~~J?j~_t!i~kl)lQ!1J!9_f!1__~!~!~!.E9P..\!!<;!!Lq[1Jl[11L__mmmmm
Units Revenue Subtotal Units Revenue Subtotal
207 $420.09 $86,959 174 $420.09 $73,065
:~~~~Q2~~~~~~Ii?Q.~QQ~~~~~~~~~?i:~~Q~~~ .~~~I~~~~=~~~~~E?Q~QQ~~~~~~~~j?Q:~?~i~~~~
.m~9_~_____m~?_?J.?:L__ooooHgc!~.!L__ _____~~~___oo_m~?LE.?:L__n____~1&.clJ_Q_m
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
.E'!.2Q~J!Y_I~2<J;.~Y_~YJ..<';:.9.[1]![1~'=.c.<L~UHl2gY_~!d?LY..~~_~__m___m_____On
.~_~U!Y_T.?.~~_~!,g9_1TI.[1]~!1~?J_~J!1_\!kl_~trl~Ll}_~~~moooo____mmmm_m_
_!?_~.Q_I~~_L~Q![1!!l_~[~1<;!L~_LQ9_'!~![L'!.L!_!.~~~_m___nn________m_mm_
.~_'!.L~~_I~~_L~Q![1_f!1_~[~1<;!L~_LQ9_'!~!d.?.L!_!.~~L_____mm__________mm_
_!?_'!~lQ.!l_~~_1-jf~[1~_~_~~~~__m____oomoo___m_________n______m_____m_
.........-------------------------------..-----.... .-------------..----------......----------......-..-----
____L______~~c!~_!~~!Lmool~.19..L__ ____JLoom_gcl~_L~g________~?_E!.J_?_Q_m
____L_____oo~_~QQ~QQ_________l~9_Q..m .m_J?___m_J_~QQ~Q9____ooml~.tQQ_____
.___t-JJ..~:_~2<_~![1P..~~g_!QL~l[~!J_y_~~!~___ .m_JL__oom~_~~.:U~_m__ml~.9Q1___oo
.____L______gcQ9_Q.~~9_______1~.Q9_L__ .m_JLoo____gcQQ_Q._~Q___m__~?.:LQ9_L__
.____Loooo____~?_~"Q9______m__~_E!.~______ .___n1L____m_~?_~"Q9oo________l1.1Q~m__
________________m____oomm_mI.'!!_aJ.:_f!!-'!.I}Jl~l'!..~'!..'!_'!.~!J!_r:Y..r:'!..'!_e..~ ._________m_________oo____m~.1.~?J~Z~___ _____moo_______________________~)_~~JQ~~_m
9
10
11
.Revenlieinipiicts-fromoii;;Time-Fe~s----n-----oo-mmm-mm
.B.~?L!.=_~~~!~_s~~1~~_I~2<..g,[1_~\:!D9_Qkl)_Y..[11~~:_9~2.Q~_Qt~~1~~_.E!Lc.<~_m
_~.?L~~_~_lJ~_~_I.?..~_Q!l_<.;:QQ~_t!kl_~~9..IJ_:Q&~1'!..9.t,g9_Q~!!kl_~~9_1J._<';:_q~!_____
_!?_~.Q_I~~_9_Q_<.;:_Q[1_~tr.!-!.c.<!Lq[1_9L~_Qi~~:_9~_1~9..'2''!._QL<.;:QQ~).!'Y_~~9_Q_~Q~!m
---.....-.....-..---------.......-..-------------------
Units Revenue Subtotal
.oo__9oo_____nn~Q"9_Q_____oo_oooo~9oo__oo_
.____9oom__oooo~Q"9_Q.._moooooo~Q______
____9oooomoooo~Q"9_Q.._______m~Q__m_
.-----..--...------------------............--...............------
Years Revenue Subtotal
.oo_nL_____m~_~~.:?_~~__m____~?!!c~?_~____
.___ooL_ooooooJ_~M_~~_________~~_~c4?_E!._m
.m_J_oooo_____H~.:9_4?_________~J~LQ~_~__oo
.-----------m-------moom-----------m--;--;;t~i:-one:iime-Reiienues .---m-----------------oo---------$O--m- .--m----oom-moo-------------$1-3:,-,806'-oo
Notes:
:Residential Property tax is based upon average assessed value (2006 data) at existing properties in the proposed annexation area excluding commerciallindustrial properties. Average
1 :assessed value per unit ($171.381) divided by 1.000 and then multiplied by Bremerton's 2007 property tax levy rate per $1.000 of assessed value ($2.451212) provides an average per
:unit property tax revenue to the City of Bremerton of $420.09. Includes the regular and EMS property tax levy rate.
----------~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:Residential utility taxes based on average annual power bill at $1.500 and an average annual telephone service bill of $500 per housing unit. This analysis ignores cable television.
2 :waste disposal & waterlsewerlstormwater utility revenues as not all units will be subjected to these taxes based on service provision choices. This overly simplified revenue expectation
___ _ __ __ _ _ :f9~ .!_'!i~ty_t~~~~ ~s_ ~h~~~f9~~ Y~'Y_,,'?n.s_e.:::~t~v_e, _'!:~~ ~a_t~ _a! ~.!~ .?pp~~q._ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
3
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ;'!:~~ ~~~~_<!i~t..ri_b.!_'!~s_~~~ !a.x, !ig~~~ ~a_x, ~~!! _c~i~i~~I)!:,~~,,~ !u_n.d.s_ t9_t~!:' .c~i!y_ '.?~ .?)~~r_c_ap!t.?_~a.s!~._ !~!:' _c9~~i~~q r~~.t9~ ?99!'!~ ~~!' ,6_4_e~r_t~!:' _~~!e_ !?!:,p~~~_e_n~ _a! .~e.v~!'!:'!:', _ _ _ _ __
:Commercialllndustrial use Property tax is based upon the current assessed value (2006 data) of the one existing property in the proposed annexation area of this type. Assessed value
:for this unit ($877.630) divided by 1.000 and then multiplied by Bremerton's 2007 properly levy rate per $1.000 of assessed value ($2.451212) provides an average per unit property tax
:revenue to the City of Bremerton of $2.151.26. New development tor commercialflndustrial use is assumed to average to this same assessed value tor the purposes of the tuture
__ __ _ _ _. _ _ :~~i~d_O~: ~:,~i~~.e::i~_a:::._ :~c:~~:: :h_e_ ~e_g~:a_r_".n_d_ ~~_S_ ~~o!,_e_rty_t~~ ::~y_ r:'::_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ____ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. __
:Commercialllndustrial utility taxes based on estimated average annual power bill of $4.500 and an average annual telephone service bill at $500 per housing unit. This analysis ignores
:waste disposal & waterlsewerlstormwater utility revenues due to a lack at data from which a reasonable estimate could be extrapolated. This overly simplified revenue expectation for
:utility taxes is therefore very conservative. Tax rate at 6% applied.
~..-..----,------------------------_._----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 :Businesses in the annexed area at the time of annexation are exempt from the City's 8&0 tax for a period of 3 years. Thereafter, 8&0 tax revenue IS assumed to apply at the lowest
:Possible rate (retail - .00125) and is applied to the taxable revenues from business operations which is assumed to be the average taxable retail sales per business for Kitsap County
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ :($?~?,~~3)p_er ~~~ :~a_s_h~n_g~~~ _S_t~~e_ ~I~~,:~c_ ~gg~-?99!':._ _ _~hJ~ !''.?TP_u~~~ !O_ ~ p_e~ .!_'!'~t!~y~,:~~ ~~e~"t~~'.?~ p!:,~ Y~~~ '.?f_ ~~~-:. ~? _(~~~~.~?~ _~ ,0_0_1_2.5)._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
:Sales tax revenue from commercial/industrial uses is based upon taxable revenues from business operations which is assumed to be the average taxable retail sales per business for
7 :Kitsap County ($235.353) per the "Washington State Almanac 2006-2007" multiplied by the City tax rate at .0085 (1% less .15% administrative fee to the County). This computes to a
_ _ _. _. _ _ _ _ ;e~r_~,:i! ~e_v~!'!:'!:'_e.xp~9_a~i9!'_ee! y_e.?~ 9! ~?,0_0_0:~g~~~~5-,~?~ _~ ,O_O.??L ___ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __
........ _~........ ~!~': S:Jty}~9~~~~ ?_I~c~!l?~ _b_e_i?~~,:C!!~ ~IJ p~?Ln~;;?S!~ s:e~9~~t!~Q. ~~~i~~~~ ~~~,::i!y_ i!l_~r_e~':r:!~~._ _~h_e_ ~~r!,:~t_l~c~!l?~ J~': l~ ~~~ P~E Y~~~..... _ _ _ _ _ _............................................ _.. _ __
:Real Estate Excise Tax on sales of residential properties that are then converted to industriallcommercial uses is based upon an assumed sale price at such property that is equal to the
9 :current average assessed value ($171.381) multiplied by the REET tax rate (.005) for a revenue per unit sold of $856.91. The number of residences converted in use at the end at the
:20 year buildout period analyzed is 33 (207 units in 2007 - reduced to 174 units in 2027). 33 units converted at a per unit revenue expectation of $856.91 provides a total "one time"
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ;r_ey!:,~~~ .i'_rTl'?~,:t_o!_$_2.?,~7.a..9~ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _. _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __. _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ __
:Sales and use tax on construction related to the buildout of new industriallcommerical use facilities is based upon a taxable construction cost equaling 80% of the final average assessed
10 :value (.80 X 877,630) times the City sales tax rate (.0085) then multiplied by the number of such facilities estimated to be constructed during the analysis period (16) which provides a
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ :t9!~I~'9~~ _ti~~"_r~y!:,~~~ .i'~'?'!.n_t_o! _$_9_5,-:a.E!..~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
:B&O tax on construction related to the buildout of new industriallcommerical use facilities is based upon a taxable construction cost equaling 80% of the final average assessed value
11 :(.80 X 877.630) times the City's applicable B&O tax rate (.00125) then multiplied by the number of such tacilities estimated to be constructed during the analysis period (16) which
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ :er9y~d_e_s_~ !'?t~I_'~o_n~_t~",~': ~~v_e".!_'~_~"''.?~~t-'~f_~1..4.:Q~~.P.?_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _. __ __ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ __
General
4
5
. _. _ .: . . . . ;~I! ~~'?u_n.t~ i'~~ !:'~e~e..s..s!:'!! 1': ?99!' _d_O!I~~S_ ~~q 99 _ ,:~t J,:"I~q~ .i'!'Y _c.o"..s~d_er~~'?': ~~ ~u~~r_e_ i~~I~~~,:~ry _a_fl_e!,!S_ '?~ ~_a_~~t_ <!r~v_e_n_er9P~~Y .v~lu_a~i9!' _c_h_a_n9~..s, __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
..........:........ i'3~~I_ ~~t~!:. ~~~i:~_~~x_ ~~ P~~i99i;::..s..a1~~ 9~ ~~i~~~Q ~9~~i!19_o..r_c_o_~T.:~~i~~i!'9~~~i~l ~~~~ ~n.. th"e.. ~r~~_i~ JQ~~r~9 .f~~ th!~ ~~~~~~s.. t9_~e_ ~~T}~~ry~~,:e;;........................................................
West Hills Island Annexation Report
11I-3
111.3 Sanitary Sewer
Summary of Services to Be Provided
The Bremerton Level of Service (LOS) for sanitary
sewer service (proposed) is 100 gallons per person
per day. The West Hills Island area currently has a
sewer main in the Werner Rd. corridor, but no
Sanitary Sewer service is present for the bulk of the
residential lands stretching to the north along
Sunnyhill Rd. It is expected that at some future time
a sewer line could be extended along Sunnyhill Rd.
and other residential streets in the vicinity. This
sewer would most likely be funded through a local
improvement district or by adjacent development,
with some cost-sharing with City of Bremerton.
Summary of Additional Service Demand
Since Bremerton sewer already serves this general
vicinity no significant increase in demand for sewer
service is anticipated with this proposed annexation.
Incremental demand with new development has
already been accounted for in Wastewater
Comprehensive Plan.
Rate Revenue Changes
Some minor change in rate revenue collection to the
area is anticipated as existing customers in the area
currently pay a surcharge for Bremerton services.
Over time as buildout increases, especially for
residential uses there will be increased rate
revenue.
Impact on Service Delivery Capacity
Annexation of the West Hills Island will create no
direct impact on the ability of the City to provide
Sanitary Sewer services as a whole.
Unique Service Delivery Challenges
No unique service delivery challenges are
anticipated.
111-4
Summary of Costs I Revenues. Sewer
As seen in the table at right, the City will incur annual
operating costs of $6,222 in the initial year, but will run a
surplus of $172,164 by the end of the 20-year horizon.
The improving financial picture is due to the increased
number of commercial ratepayers for sewer service.
For capital costs, the City will incur total one-time costs
of $12,432 over the 20 year period. This includes cost
sharing for the extension of the gravity-sewer lines to
several currently unserved residential areas. This total
cost impact however, is largely softened by the collec-
tion of Gross Facility Charges (GFCs) for new commer-
cial users hooking up.
March, 2007
WEST HILLS ISLAND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SERVICE DELIVERY COSTS
Urban Service: SANITARY SEWER
Department: PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES
Annexing Existing (2007)
Buildout Scenario (2026)
Operational Costs (Per Year) Units Cost Subtotal
___________________________P..~!~_~!).!!~!L~_t.?_tfl!),[g~~!~: _____~?_______jg:~;3J..n_jl!i.!~lQQL_
n_________________________________~~P..e~~~_~_~~.!Yl~~~ _____~?_____njg:~?~L___jg:U~_!lL_
__________________Q.~pJ_~~EY1~~_~I]_Q.~pJ!9LQLQ!?_~g~g2 ____________________________________00__
Subtotal
Units Cost Subtotal
191 ($33) ($6,303)
:::}~!:::::::::{~;i?2::::::::::[~~::Ii~[::::
_~~~~_~~~_~~_'!~_~9.l!~_'!~_~~J~~!_Y..~~!L_____________ _____________00_________________00______
_________________________~J~_~2.!!~!)_~~.!!~~_~t~~!~_~9!,[~ _____~?________l~J_l?]_____J;i~~~~11___
___________________6~i.~~i2!1_~U3.?.~~e.9.1!?!~_B~_~L~~_f!~~J._______________________________________
_____________~____~g5!~~<?!)_~LB~_t~..e.9.x~!~_~9_1!l_~~!~ j~J _00_____________________________________
________________________________l~~A:~JJ.____
___lj_~l________~!:~~____~____Jl!i.l~_~~!?_~2___
---_!~---------~~~~~~---------~~~~~~~~-----
:::::::::::::::::::E~t~l:~~~:~9.~:~~!?~:~rB"i.~""i.~""i.~~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::}!~~?~?1::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::E??;I~~C:::
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
Units Cost Subtotal
_~~~~~~~_~~_'!~_~9.l!~_~~_~~JQ~_~_!l!!1_~L___________ _______________________________000000___
______________00_______00_ _ s:ifg_!i9_~~~..e~_~9_1!l_T1l~!~j~J _______________________________ ______00_
_____________n_____________s:if..Q._1j9_~~_~e~_B~~L~~_f!~.9J ____________m________m______________
CapitaI"C-osts;;TOneTfmEiExpEiris-esr------------ ----Cjn~s-------CosT------Su-btotaT--
_____________________~_~~r!:l.?.~~g_!2!9J_~9_~~~_~9!~!9_~J!~ _____~__________~9____________~Q_______
of future sewer extensions.
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
Units Cost Subtotal
::::I~::::::::E1:?~~::::::::~~~?~~~~::::
Units (LF) Cost Subtotal
_l_Q~Q9_Q______Jl!i.l?_~2_______J~~?_Q~Q9_Q2___
--------------n-n-Ne""io;;e-fj-,.;ie-cos-iTRevenues ----m----n-----------------'$O------- -------------------------------7.rf2~432T---
Notes
1 10,000 LF of sanitary sewer extenstion assumed along Broad IIDA, Sunnhill, and Price, Cost assumed at $125LF based on
other recent cost estimates. 20% cost share with LID I Development assumed by City,
2 Staffing costs are fully loaded with benefits etc, estimates based on per capita per city as a whole,
3 No new GFC charges assumed for redevelopment of residential lots due to balance with residential lots converted to industry,
4 All dollars are 2007. 2027 buildout costs are cumulative over the 20 year period.
5 Industrial Sewer usage estimated at 5000 HCF per month
West Hills Island Annexation Report
111-5
111.4 Potable Water
Summary of Services to Be Provided
The Bremerton LOS for potable water service is 200
gallons per equivalent residential unit, and minimum
fire flows of 1,000 gpm residential 2 hours, and
2,000 gpm commercial for 2 hours. Bremerton will
continue to provide water service to the area. The
West Hills Island is already on the City of Bremerton
water system.
Additional Service Costs - Operational
Providing potable water services to the West Hills
Island annexation area will result in additional
operational costs as more customers are served by
the water utility. These costs will be offset by the
additional rates collected from these customers.
Summary Additional Costs
No direct capital costs are associated with the
annexation of the West Hills Island related to potable
water. Bremerton already provides potable water to
the area and accounts for costs in its water service
planning. Any additional capital cost will be financed
by either a local improvement district or
development.
Rate Revenue Changes
Upon annexation existing ratepayers in the annexing
area will cease to pay an out-of-city rate. This will
result in an initial revenue decrease of roughly
$25,000 per year.
Impact on Service Delivery Capacity
No direct impact on the ability of the system to
provide potable water service to the area is
anticipated.
Unique Service Delivery Challenges
None anticipated.
11I-6
Summary of Costs I Revenues - Sewer
As seen in the table at right, the City will incur a signifi-
cant negative impact on operating in the initial year, due
to the loss of rate revenue from current customers who
will cease to pay a surcharge for water service. This
negative amount is softened slightly in the 2027 year as
new commercial ratepayers are added.
For capital costs, since the system is already in place
there are no one-time cost impacts. GFC charges of
new users hooking up will bring the City roughly
$313,000 over the 20 year horizon.
March, 2007
WEST HILLS ISLAND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SERVICE DELIVERY COSTS
Urban Service: POTABLE WATER
Department: PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES
2006 - Annexing Existing
Operational Costs (Per Year) Units Cost Subtotal
.___________________________~_~~~9_~~~I_~_~!9.!!L~g_fg~~~* ______Q__________1~2.9J___ ________~Q________
.___________________________________~_~[?.P..ll~~_~_~_~~L'2~~ .______Q___________\:~'~~l___________~Q________
-...---------------- ---------------------------------------- .----------------------------------------------
.~~Y..~!l~!:._~_~!I_~~_q!l_f!!1_<:~_~_l'?!:.~ .r!:.~r!____ __________ .__________00__________________________________
._________________________Ql~~_~~!L~~_~~~~_<;?!_~_~~~~_~~g~ ._____~Q.!.._______J~].z91______ig:L?~l?L__
.___________________~g.9J!i.2.!:l~U:~Sl!~.QSlY..~I~_B~~J~L~I1!L~ I .____00___ _____n___________________~Q____ ____
._________________ _~_q9j!i9_r:!9J _B~!~.P..~y_~~~_~_<?I!:l_f!l_~I~L~1 .00____________________________________________
Buildout Scenario (2026)
Units Cost Subtotal
o ($40) $0
~~~~~~Q~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~?I~~~~~~~~]Q~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~~~?~I~}
______Q___n_______g~9___________~Q____
_____!.?.___________H!9________!U?~~__
.---------------------------------------------------------.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.__________________!..'!_t!!~~!'..f!!!!!!J!:.~'!..f!.1J_'!.!:f!J.!!!'..g2.~ ._______________________________(!ff_~1&!~1____ _____ _________________________J~_!?~~_~~ 1
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. . . .. . ... . . . - ----Units--------c-osT------s'U"ljtotaj"---
.~~Y..~!l~!:._~_~!I_~~_q!l_f!!1_<:~_~_lQ.I]~_.!!~~l____________ .__________ _________________ _________00________
._m_______m____mmn__~E,g_!:!<;?9..~~.Q~_B~~J~I.~!:1!L~1 .____m__m__m_________m_______m____m
.n_____________________n_g.!:,g_tl_<?~_~~.P..~_~_<?I!:l!!1_~I~!~ I .__________ ____________________________________
Debt Proceeds
.----------------------------------------------... ---------- .----------------------------------------------
----- -------------------------------------
Units Cost Subtotal
... -------...-------------- -------------------
----_!.?._--------~-~~~?_~~-----~~!~~~Q~
.C:.<!P!!~~ .C:.C?~~:>.*. ~~!l.~ .T!~~. ~~P.E?!l.~~~1............. ....... _. _ _ _... _.................. no _ _ _ - -... ...................... -........ - - -. -.. - --
.n_______~~_~J9.~~!~9_~!_~~pJ!9L~PJl~~Q~~_9_'J!i~i.P..~!~.9 .___n_9____________~9______________~Q____ ____ _____ _Q_____________1Q ___________ _~Q____
.--------------------NeToii-e-tiiiie-CostTRevenues .-----------------------------------$0--------
1 Difference in City and County water rate paying is $120 per year for an average 3-person household.
2 Water consumption for commercial businesses is assumed at 5,000 HCF.
West Hills Island Annexation Report
----- -------------------------------------
$313,808
111-7
111.5 Transportation
Summary of Services to Be Provided
Bremerton utilizes a LOS of D to identify
deficiencies in the transportation network. No
arterials in the annexing area have an identified
deficiency. Other transportation levels of service
that will be applied include:
- Maintain and enhance existing roadway surfaces
and conditions.
- Seek to upgrade existing roadways to City
standards with curbs, gutters, planter strips and
sidewalks.
- Require all new development to meet City street
standards or equivalent.
.Summary of Additional Service Demand
Additional maintenance and repair costs associated
with service to the area will be incurred. Some
upgrade to through routes, especially Werner Rd. in
this vicinity may be anticipated as development
occurs. Some cost sharing with developers may be
anticipated.
Summary Additional Costs - Capital
Some roadways in the West Hills Island area will
require capital investment over the 20 year
timeframe. Any major reconstruction of streets
including the construction of curb, gutter and
sidewalk will be financed either by a local
improvement district or development. Major
maintenance of these roads including overlays will
be placed in priority order based on the street
condition rating.
Impact on Service Delivery Capacity
No substantial impact on ability of the City to provide
transportation services is anticipated.
Unique Service Delivery Challenges
A number of the residential streets in the area are
underimproved without curb and gutter or sidewalk.
Some of the streets are in similar condition to those
within city limits. Maintenance of these streets will
be prioritized based on the citywide condition rating.
111-8
Summary of Costs I Revenues - Transportation
As seen in the table at right, the City will incur a signifi-
cant negative impact in operating costs related to
maintenance and repairs of existing streets in the area.
These annual cost impacts are relatively constant for the
area over the buildout period as the extent of the
roadway system is largely established.
For capital costs, roadway resurfacing I reconstruction
projects are assumed for a total of 1.42 miles of street.
These roadway improvements are combined with storm
sewer improvements as a construction practicality. The
combined cost is assumed at $2.5M per mile. Half the
cost is allocated to Storm and half is allocated to
Transportation. Most improvements will be paid for
through LID or with development, so a cost share
portion to the City of just 20% is assumed. This leads to
total one-time costs for streets of $355,000 over the 20
year period.
March, 2007
WEST HILLS ISLAND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SERVICE DELIVERY COSTS
Urban Service: TRANSPORTATION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES
Annexing Existing (2006)
Buildout Scenario (2026)
Operational Costs (Per Year) Units Cost Subtotal Units Cost Subtotal
.______________________________..r:~!..~9DD~J_L~!9ftiD.9_gg?_t? _____?Q?_________L~~3L_____(~J.:~:.Q~+_~L__ ___~_~L___________lr@?1________i?X~:.~.??2__
.______________________________________~~epJ!~?_~_~~~~~~? ._____?Q?_________t~?.~1_____J~]_!:.~9.2L__ ___~_~~___________1~??1_______J~_'!.:~:.Q~~r?2__
.____________________.Q~ ~!_~~_':.'!L~~_9!!._~~l?!~~L lif_!:1_~~.9.~~ .____________________________________________ --- ------- ------ ----------------- --------------
.------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ -- ------------------------- ------- --------------
.~~Y..~!!~~_~_<:!!l_~~_q~~!!':~_~_ t<.?_']~.I!~~l_______________ -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
.___r:!9!~_:_~J9 !.'I!~_~1~r_~~y.~_LIl!::l':!st~9_!1]_9~I]:.J~I]9..!i'l2~~.? ______Q___________~_(L___________~Q________ _____Q_________ _____~9_______________~9_______
.------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
._____________________I.':!!fJLt!.!!!!!!.~lB_~~_~!.l_~~_f!2.i!!.?JI~~ ______m____________________i~~Q,_~~_0____ ____________m_________~________(~~J!:~!i~l__
.Revenue-C-onsElquences-[OrieTimey--------------- ----Unlt'S-------Co-sr-----su-bto'"{cii--- -Unlt'STMTr----..C-os'"{--------Subtotcir-
._________________________________________~_9I1_~~!.!~.s:Jp_'~!~9 ____________________________________________ ___________________________ -___________________
.--------------.-------------------------------.----------------------------------------------------------
.~~E~~'!~_~~~!:;..*_iq!!~_TJ.!!'_E!_~_~I?_~~_~~_~L_____________ ._________________________ ___________________
._________________~_~~!!1_~~~9_!9!~J_!::9_~~?_~i'l.!"~L~i'l_tch_~~~ ______Q___________~_Q___________~Q____m_
.__!..~~9..~~y_~.P_g.!"~<.!~_~_@_?Q'Y2_~i!~_!_J.Qi.Q~_':::~!9P..~~_llt _________ m_______ ___________________ ______
~~~i~~~~~~~~~1~~~:~Q~Q:Q9~Qi~~~1~~~~~~q9~i~
.--------------------------------------------------s.iilitotai --------- ---------------- --------$0-- ---- -- --------------------------------($-.:f55~Oo{ji-
1 Stormwater and capital roadway improvements are assumed for 1.42 miles of underimproved roadway in the study area. Cost of
combined improvement is estimated at $2.5M per mile based on comparable projects and the City Engineer. Half
the cost is allocated to stormwater upgrade and half is allocated to roadway upgrade. 20% of total cost is assumed as a cost
share or match from City of Bremerton sources. The remaining 80% is to be paid by development, LID or other source.
West Hills Island Annexation Report
11I-9
111.6 Storm Sewer
Sumary of Services to Be Provided
The City of Bremerton regulates storm drain
activities. Maintenance and operation cost are
funded by the rates collected by the storm water
utility. These will be applied to the newly annexing
area. As is common in many of the roads in
Bremerton most of the existing roadways in the area
have only roadside ditches without curbs and
gutters.
Summary of Additional Service Demand
The operational costs for this area will be offset by
the rates from the new residents and industries.
Summary Additional Costs - Capital
Some roadways in the West Hills Island area will
require capital investment over the 20 year
timeframe. Any major reconstruction of streets will
include construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk,
and will be financed either by a LID or development.
Impact on Service Delivery Capacity
No direct impact on the ability of the Bremerton
system to handle storm water is anticipated.
Facilities to accommodate increased storm water
runoff into the system will be constructed with
installation of new curb and gutter.
111-10
Summary of Costs I Revenues - Storm Sewer
As seen in the table at right, the City will incur a surplus
in operating costs related to stormwater in the initial year,
as the stormwater assessment is collected. At buildout,
as storwater facilities are constructed maintenan'ce costs
will be incurred on an annual basis. Increase in the
amount of stormwater assessments will also occur.
For capital costs, roadway stormwater improvement
projects are assumed for the same 1.42 miles of street
where roadway improvements will occur. These road-
way improvements are combined with storm sewer
improvements as a construction practicality. The
combined cost is assumed at $2.5M per mile. Half the
cost is allocated to Storm and half is allocated to
Transportation. Most improvements will be paid for
through LID or with development, so a cost share
portion to the City of 20% is assumed. This leads to
total one-time costs for storm facilities of $355,000 over
the 20 year period.
March, 2007
WEST HILLS ISLAND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SERVICE DELIVERY COSTS
Urban Service: STORMWATER
Department: PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES
Existing - 2007
Buildout Scenario - 2027
Operational Costs (Per Year) Units Cost Subtotal
___________________________~~E:>_'~~_~~!L~_t.9..f!l~9__~~~!~: _____Q_________~Q____________~_Q_______
___________________ ________________?~P.E~~~_~_?..~EY1~~~ ______________ __________________________
__________________!?_~p_~?.~EY!~~_~I]_~~ pJ!~l_ QLr:!~_~9~92 ____________ __ __________________________
Units Cost Subtotal
.____~~_~________j3'..~91_______j2'.!2:.~?!21__
.____~~_~________j3:~~1________i~~~:.~9_~L_
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_~~':!~_r:!~~_~?.!!~!:.9..':!~_I:!~_E!~J~~!_Y__=~!L_____________ ________________________________________
___________________~9_q~l~~_~!_F3~t~~~~r~_!3~_~~q~.!!~~J ____?Qr_______~~~________~J_~~?1:~____
__________________~95!i!~~~_'~~!3~_t~.E~.>::~E:>_s::9_'!1_r:!:.~rs:l~J ______l______J_~~_l_________~~_~1______
.----17-4----------$93---------$1~j(43-5--
.~~~~~I~~~~~~~~]~~~I~~~~~~Jf?~~~~~~~~~
-------------------Toiai,,:;;nuarRe~enu-e-Ciia;;9..--es ---------------------------$20-207---- ..-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_$_-_j_7_-_1_-:_2_2_-_0_-_-_
---------------------------------------------- ------- --- ------------------------------_!..--------
--------------------------------;;------------------------- ------------ -- --------------------------
Revenue Consequences lOne Time) Units Cost Subtotal
____________________________gE_g__fj9_~~_l!~~_!3~_~~q~_~~~J ____________ ____________________________
___________________________~fg_!::!9_~~~.E:>_s::9_'!1_r:!:.~rs:J~J ________________________________________
.---uiiij-s---------c;C;st---------s-utitolai--
.~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~J~q~~~~~~~lE4~f~Q~~
---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- -------------------
_~~e!!~L~_<?~_t~:_t<.?_I:!~_.!~'1!~_~~E~.!!~!:.~L____m____ ______m__________m__________________
Estimated total cost share I match
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~}~~~~~~~~!~r~~p.9r~~~~i~@~?Q% ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.-----1-------{S;;~50()jjo-6)---~S3f~5~o1jo,-
.________________ ______;.___________________'.1_
-------m-----------NetOii;;ffme-CostTRe"-eriues -------------------------------"(j------- .-------------------------------{s;iilfifsoj-
1 Stormwater and capital roadway improvements are assumed for 1.42 miles of underimproved roadway in the study area. Cost of
combined improvement is estimated at $2.2M per mile based on comparable projects and the City Engineer. Half
the cost is allocated to stormwater upgrade and half is allocated to roadway upgrade. 20% of total cost is assumed as a cost
share or match from City of Bremerton sources. The remainder 80% will be funded by LID or development.
West Hills Island Annexation Report
11I-11
111.7 Fire & EMS
Sumary of Services to be Provided
The Bremerton LOS for Fire Protection isa rsponse
time of 5.5 minutes. The Bremerton urban level of
service standard (LOS) for Emergency Medical
Service (proposed) is a response time of 4.0 minuts
for Basic Life Support, and 8.0 minutes for Ad-
vanced Life Support. Upon annexation the BFD will
provide Fire Protection and EMS Services to the
West Hills Island area. Response times from Station
#2 are expected to be between 4 and 5 minutes.
Currently Fire & EMS service is provided to this
area by the Central Kitsap Fire & Rescue.
- Emergency Fire & EMS response service shall
come from Fire Station #2 located at 5005 Kitsap
Way.
- Additional alarm fire responses will come from Fire
Stations #1, 3 and 63. Fire Station #1 is located at
911 Park Ave, Fire Station #3 is located at 3031
Olympus Drive and Statino #63 is located in Jack-
son Park.
- Additional EMS response will come from Fire
Station #3.
Summary of Additional Service Demand
Providing services to the West Hills Island annex-
ation area by BFD will result in the following addi-
tional service costs.
- 2006 call volume increase was at 138 calls per
year.
- 2027 call volume increase to roughly 175 calls per
year.
Summary of Additional Costs
To provide the additional service to the area the
Department will need to add 3 Firefighters. Our
current needs today, without any additional work
load would be three paramedic units operating
100% of the time, it currently operates approximately
30% of the time. Our out of service time for the two
paramedic units is steadily increasing. The existing
and projected population of the area does not
warrant any new capital such as fire station, or
engines.
11I-12
Impact on Service Delivery Capacity
Without recommended staffing increases, the additional
call volumes associated with annexation of the West
Hills Island would have a definite and noticeable impact
on the Department's capacity to deliver services to the
City as a whole. Currently the Department has an engine
and paramedic unit at Fire Station #2 on Kitsap Way
which woudl respond to this area. The backup engine
would come from Fire Station #1 and paramedic re-
sponse would come from Fire Station #3 in East
Bremerton. There is not a staffed paramedic unit 100%
of the time at Fire Station #1. This would create a longer
response time not only to this area but also to the
citizens of Bremerton. It also increases the amount of
out of service time, which decreases the amount of
training time.
Unique Service Delivery Challenges
A map of the proposed annexation area with brown
circles to indicate fire hydrant coverage is attached. As
you can see there are some areas that have poor fire
hydrant coverage along Harlow Drive and Sunnyhill Rd.
March, 2007
WEST HILLS ISLAND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SERVICE DELIVERY COSTS
Urban Service: FIRE PROTECTION
Department: BREMERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT
2006 - Annexing Existing Buildout Scenario (2026)
Operational Costs (Per Year) Units Cost Subtotal Units Cost Subtotal
___________________________!:~!~~IJ.!').~!L?J?_1!!IJ.9.g~~~~: ______1________~~?!..'..?:.!!~L......_t~.?~2J~f~~:U.._.. .._..__~.._....____t~n:.~Lf2Ljl?~;~1:.~;)..~L
____________......_..........____..____......__~l:!p..eLi~~_~_~~.!Y!~~~ ---------------------------------------------- .._.._..9.._........_.._.._~Q_____________~9_____....
---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
_~!'!~_~~~_~~_~~..<<:g_~~_~~_<<:~_!~~!_'!..~~!l_______.._...._.... ~~~~~~Q~~~~~~~~~~1Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~!Q~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~9~~~~~~~~~~~~~Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~9_~~~~~~
No direct
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------......-..- ------------------------------------------
___________________!~~'!I_~_'!.!'..'!!l.L~~_'::~!!~_~_~'!!l_'!.fI..'!! _____________mm____m_____(~?_~1&~1L_ ___________________________.f~_~~_!:.~~~_
-Reve-riue-Co-ris-eq-ue-rices-(Orie-fime)------------- --- ------- ------------------------------------ ------ ------------------------------------
Units Cost Subtotal Units Cost Subtotal
_______________________________....__...._~~IJ~_~~..t!~!P_9~~_~ ______________________________________________ ------------------------------------------
---------------------NetOne-;="i"me..CostTReveii-ues ---------------------------------------------- ..-..---..-........-..-..-----------------$0-------
0
1 Three Additional firefighters salaries fully loaded with benefits are estimated at a cost of $77,278 annually.
Fire coverage by hydrants for the West Hills Island indicated by brown circles.
West Hills Island Annexation Report
111-13
111.8 Public Safety
Sumary of Services to be Provided
The Bremerton Police Department staffing planning
is currently based on a level of service of 2.0
officers per 1,000 persons. This figure is derived
from data in the Manpower Needs Assessment, an
internal planning document which shows a national
average LOS of 2.3 officers per 1,000 persons.
BPD views the West Hills Island as one area within a
group of areas within the south and west quadrant of
the City which will experience increased demand for
public safety services in the coming years. Other
related areas include potential annexation of Navy
Yard City, and new developments in the West Hills
area and the Bayside I Sinclair Ridge areas. Future
growth at SKIA also factors in. All told, population
increase of 5,000 or more persons is expected with
additional commercial and industrial demands as
well.
Summary of Additional Costs
To meet the increased demand BPD will need at
least 10 additional staff plus associated costs and
vehicles. A detailed total for these combined
increases was prepared with the potential annex-
ation analysis for the South Kitsap Industrial Area
(City of Bremerton, January 2007). A relatively small
portion of this additional cost is attributable to the
West Hills Island. Based on population and geogra-
phy factors 6% of the south I west sector increases
may be attributable to West Hills for the purpose of
the analysis.
Impact on Service Delivery Capacity
Without recommended staffing increases, the
additional call volumes associated with annexation
of the West Hills Island and other nearby growth
areas would have a noticeable and substantial
impact on the ability of the City to deliver public
safety services.
111-14
March, 2007
WEST HILLS ISLAND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA SERVICE DELIVERY COSTS
Urban Service: PUBLIC SAFETY
Department: BREMERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
2006 - Annexing Existing
Buildout Scenario (2026)
Operational Costs (Per Year) Units Cost Subtotal
____________________________!:'_~~~9.n!l_~LL_~_t9..f!lr:!9_f9_~~~: _____?~~'!.______j~~:~f2~213_~2_____ _t~~_Q~(J:lt_
____________________________________~_l!p.EU~_~_~_?.E.:!Yl!?!:.~ _____?~~O________j~_~?..9!l9J.______.c~ 2..0!l9J.__
Units Cost Subtotal
6% {Sb4b,i(l3) ($bO,/')1)
-----6-oi--------i:~;-,-;.-r~;::(-) ')-------'-;:1-;;-(77)-)--
______~'?_______~.:L~?.:::::..~~_:._____J.;:~.;~:~!~___
_13_~y_~~_l!~_f?.~~c:.9.~~~_~c:~_<~~!..!~!!~l_________ ______ ________________________________________________
No direct 0 $0 $0
----------------------------------- ----------------- ------- ------------------------------------------------
.. -------------------------------------------
_____Q____________~_Q______________~9______
::::::::::::::::::::f9.~!~!!~Y_~Z~~y.~!!~~I1!~!!9_~! :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::(~if.?:~!lC ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::(~~I~Iil:
------- -----------------------~~--------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
Capital Costs (One Timel Units Cost Subtotal
Vehicles 6% i$120,()()O) {$7,200j
___________________________________________________________ ________________..l___________________________""___
Units Cost Subtotal
____?X~______!'.:~J~9..9!l9)_____.iSE.:~il9J..
---------------------Ne-iOne-Tln,e-cosiTRevei,ue-s -----------------------------------($7~iOOr-- ---------------------------------($7~200T"
1 Total annual costs (salary and benefits) of $845,183 plus $25,000 are estimated operational expenses to service the southlwest
Bremerton area, including new residential developments in the vicinity, future annexation of Navy Yard City, and residential
development in the Bayside / Sinclair Ridge area, and future development at SKIA. Of this amount 6% is allocated to the increasess
associated with the West Hills Island, based on approximate share of population and geography.
2 Six police vehicles are estimated to be needed to serve increases attributable to growth in the south / west Bremerton area as
described above, Police Vehicles are assumed at $20,000 each,
West Hills Island Annexation Report
111-15
Page left intentionally blank.
11I-16
March, 2007
City Council Public Hearing
- ---------~----~---"--^----------------_._--- -~~------- ----~~----------"-,--~._--
3/21 Council Meeting
Public Hearing
- Resident Comment
- CounciLHears Testimony
- Review of Costs 1 Bene.
ANNEXATION PROCESS
ISLAND ANNEXATIONS
2/21 Council Meeting
Resolution
- Intent to Annex
- Sets Hearing Date
.
Staff Prepares
Cost 1 Benefit Report
- Details Service Delivery
Public "Meet & Greet"
Meeting 3/12107
45 Day Recall Period
10% of Electors Must
File Petition
~
~mfJ~
City Council Public Hearing
THE ANNEXATION AREA
· Approximately 171 Acres
· Approximately 500 People
· Approximately $36M Assessed Value
· Primarily Single Family Residential
· Some Industry On Werner Rd.
~~1JfJ~
~D City Council Public Hearing
~'...,'... Bremerton City Limit
i
. ".
!
,1
"'i....
"
;..i....
#..".i~ .
'T' " 1/,..,....
, II .l''''
. ).-1' __..~..
I ",......".....
" .........,."...,
'''~I", ........",.....-.... .
"...,,~............,."
WHY DOES BREMERTON
WANT TO ANNEX?
· Within Bremerton Urban
Growth Area (UGA) For More Than
a Decade. (Dec. 29 '94 County Compo Plan)
.
Efficient Delivery of Urban
Services.
Protect Community Character"
Not A 'Money-Maker'.
~ ~llfJ WJJt1
City Council Public Hearing
COST IMPACTS
TO THE CITY OF BREMERTON?
City of Bremerton
West Hills Island
Annexation Area Report
& Cost I Benefit Analysis
March, 2007
· In 2007 Annual Cost Impact of
Approximately -$190,000.
· In 2027 Estimated Annual Revenue
Impact of +$400,000.
· Net One-Time (Capital) Costs I
Revenues of Approximately
-$133,000.
~~fJ~
City Council Public Hearing
WEST HILLS ISLAND POTENTIAL ANNEXATION
COST COMPARISON WORKSHEET
PROPERTY TAX COMPARISON
I I~
Enter Your Home's ~
Total Assessed Value
.0106278
Total Tax Rate
City
+ $'1.00
Noxious Weed
Assessment
.0107662
Total Tax Rate
County
+ $1.28
Noxious Weed
Assessment
m~
'~B;OO0( I
~;[-1f"~f
+$0
No City Stormwater
Assessment on Tax Bill
City Yearly Property Tax Total
+ $57~30
Stormwater
Assessment
I
County Yearly Property Tax Total
WATER BILLING Average 2-Month Bill (Use TheAmount For Your Family)
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People
$25.46 $33.26 $40.28 $47.30 $54.32
$38.20 $49.96 $60.52 $71.08 $81.64
City
County
STORM SEWER
(City Only)
For An Average
Single Family Home
UTILITIES TAXES
(City Only) Your Average Monthly Cable Bill I
Your Average Monthly Electrical Bill I
Your Average Telephone Bill (Land Line) I
X6 Bills
Per Year
B
Monthly Bill
$7~76
COST IMPACTS TO
RESIDENTS &
PROPERTY OWNERS?
· Depends On Usage of
Services and Assessed
Value.
· Sum Total Is Roughly
Equivalent To Current
County Costs.
~.il ~f) ~
X 12 Months
City Tax
X.07
X 12 Months
X.06
X 12 Months
X.06
X '12 Months
eel
-
E >. C
+-' 0)
:J .- "0
"0 (f)._
0) C (f)
0) 0)
~oo:
CP
en
::>>
" en
c c
o
<<I ._
...+'
~<<I
..... C
C .~
::s en
o ~
UQ
l I "Il \ ''> {---::.1:!dirf I I ...~<< - >~VWN:J.r.u~ 4 -1-- I L_~ I -----~..... IT
"h'~!.rl<'I' ;J>. 'f"- ~,<'j 1 ","'" .. L~".,'\ /;/f' '1jC=-=:T--"'o!.t
~Jf"C>\E~43t'://'~ ni ~'/ (//1 f ~tbt:~ .Ii' /,;:LL ,j'" 'y://'rL~_1 r--'~I '/)
-- J -~'/Jl~HH' ,y" ;'1 ~;.f~; /, \ >/l'~'~' ,I'y;( \ L " l
Ie -:=:\'rr;:L! 1-.Ci::'iUqJ l~o='DL.,), '\'.'/')~~7' /-~,,:,f'''' '1ILL;'ii~~r.~~iillj ""
I;-~'dl..-_'...-J. ..--'---~\:\-~I I I!:'N~ / \ / ~9G 11 J. I 0 ~I "
()<::t-~T~lpIH I J=fiD-~ISJ'/ <:,{:,),\!Lri'rFLU. '- ~/ .
{!p'3S. __td--j?~N3"." '/~11' 'Il ~II N~, '
:;;;~__I+ QjEjV.J-..-. C--:t' j(;=;-J==~N...";M.LT(:r~ 1'1
('W f -JJ-'~~"'> "I (~)'_~,.'PZJ, 'I IXl L-..
'\.(.1. _ 51;~ __--I 7~ ..t- l-i~1 I-- -1'- r-- --
;,._ ____ ~__,_"" / / ....::::::::.1;/ t""-' I--\.. ,I
_/~e~,\J\I/>;/ /"/', tTB'WnL- ~ ~lllllt II
f \ \ >~- ,I I IU ..J[=-I -Je:g -R 11=: .
~r.,~.-:~:~~j r"~---! " ~I- - .r- ~~tItIIDJ'1 r-T]
I I vr--T'l-J~ lv..a.1 [-TT]'"":' r I' ,L_. ,
ci"'____r:J~L_ '\..._J I I I fliIA ~ r~t::'::,:t-=1! II: I I 1 i -_J ------
t-----~~ Il AHJ.O~b(] ! L--p:----,~=r- VOl---=-- I
~ ~j ~:~~:lJai'~ -r#~~\l! t~:~~fl~~~I[j3~~[, l
c a ~ bh MJtif:LHJI I 1-\ ,-1 . =fLl- "-", ~- f ~ !~-~-tj,[~TfBfr
I- ~ 0 nn:~ 1 I~TBl}.;[[nJIln'!=J n~' ,- ~ -- ~._---- -u. ~ 1 .iL' J, 1'-+ I
in ~ tT~.l~, "']tgt-q {~iir~T:'~ \ L, ~ lli r.OOM>".I/ f------- rr T
::I: " I;J 1<:'1 ~0)T"''l:>X2T-11:;,~~,SERENoe'ReLE' - ~-, ~ il:j l- ~ ------I ,
>< / l--[ I q <7~:',YtN. \\k;~' I I ~ r-' ~ 'f I
W <jz "'L.Lc__ "v" \:0<: "eh.J, f--- ---- I.L '! I
- t-j.....l, / t-., f Ir-r F
J j"td'r . '> I ~- -1-1J! 7 / ~:;/ // T---")/r=i'="^" =t.......-L- ~ .-- L I ---.- ~
Tf0~~t<4~., /~f'~1/ ,/"'~ ~~~..~,/ /)f<~----L;z"\/?;'r I~-~r=::~II--"'~O;j,;;:
;'l:t!~Y1f;-ffi' ~WDj ,q / II ~<,(",/ /~;>[1F);~{: /\;~,\..c~ ~
~~:?\~~ f~n~~~~l.:o}!N \\'i /~-/ 4v.~~' 11-r-<:~1. ,"i~-==:--'~~ -
r;~i~1-=lr=-ll] C lJ I Lbl; -'I, ~'""(,,f/ ~~9 J _j"----~----I u. ~ 0/ -; f
'/u/.~j I k L,; I 1=,1 j.,;"'-- / ,/ ~;i Y,if-.! 1 rT~..C!t~} / I' - ," .
/'!..'''':I~' =r'T'~"'!v/.aOO,^,N3Y. ' <:J" / l j" II ~ :11""" / C 3MOH
~', J f-' CH"'.' /;c- i1 LL -UJ " j,
~IJ~~L '\ ~qJ__l..J-' .r. /,..-1\"\ HI -; 1=r'N3m~9rJf)I=O a:: I" -:,-ffi - 1-
'x~XJELL.=-l;~~~i') r, r ~Jj) __i~~~Ll -[t [,-i~'-L_~ L __ ~~ ffi-~' ! r 1
~> '-- S __~r--~-r _ ~-/1 / f ~ !I ~-.:JLl __a~;fr I ! .~ ~Sc _, ~
/.,(tlJ\TIf~\l_';_J-:~ /11/ / 'fl-I'~J:J~i~tn:q,=1 f5'~' I 11_ Ul I -1': 1ii '-N~O~~';
1~_J \_ _~/ /~- I/~ / I~l Fj-~eCL.. ~l lJl.} I ~ :JJ1'~" -
J _ rtS""-- './., If ~--J [~ . --j ~--\\.lT~1IrrIT-'c.mllIHA N -'t>. ,
... !'-..~ .---r'i, _~ r"~--- I II I I C\c- 0 I !ii ['J
hjJ1 JL_L\-j~>yt--f;':::::', rM~' lill}-j~"~- I,LL \ ; I
, ' .~ :.J.~" j II j;;m~ f L7!,-,JL.l J _1 ____"" 1-'1
i:: ,~.C ---j 1 ~WI ,q -- -!! =r~gTrP,--nT----,'olr - I- --1
, ~ :--- --.,,1 ~--I' I -r t'.,bk\..'J ~ ,_#::'IlJ:!.-,lT1, ~ rJ 1'tI n, I, r ' -=1 J II I
,L- -:I ~ ,I 1,-\ I) Jr-T =f=::1 I
o! ~ I", _ )~nr ~~ I~r:ibt~~r -j1~lllf ,[pJfJ_~i
I- i3 ~ ~'g~,~Ma''''H~ n '._.LL' ~ jC ~ )--1 i5! L~'I tJ''T I
_ ~ 0 1" ~ c~ i f~'::gLI;, c..fTI1iTl1Irt- \ ~,- - - - ~u. '-'--e H 'Tj
!Q ~ ~-llLl-~-f:~~~tJ~~~~-~Iq~m~l\ ~, -L~ ffi rQOOm~lONjr ~---r-:--T
, ::I: m i i I Ii''; ~~h"'<:;1'.' . fERENoeIRe," ,-."'. I -.il:j-,----:. '--'l I '
>< / " : f </:/S ....'~ " , I . 0 a: ~~ I "
w <{z I Ul '/S/I ~~f):s,SK'1i I f-----1Xl- 1 ,- I
>1)'1-- --~ i~} ,-( <')::1~~t7J I: f I
"
C
ta
.J
E C
... 0
1m ....
CP.....
+' <<I
C C
....Ii>>
" .-
cp en
._ cp
:=C
sa ~
o en
~:)
~
CP
a.
en c
g <<I
.- -
......a.
<<I .
C a.
.~ E
en 0
cpu
Q'lit
~O
.- 0
UN
m
c
'i:
~I
~I
: :s I
I a. .
f ~ I
i C I
! :::s i
: 0 I
!CJ
! ~ I
i.... I
i'- t
i (.) i
! I
L-__---1
~~
i~
I
Z
<I:
m
D::
::)
o
I-
...I
~
:)
at:
:E
o
D::
LL.
Z
o
-
...
-
en
z
~
I-
m
c
.....
>C
CP
c
c
C\l
~
l
C!>
s:::
c
.....
~
CJ
o
..
en
(!.)
>
....
.....
....
o
=
c
.-
a.
CP
CP
~
"
CP
~
C
.-
..
C
o
Co)
~
o
-
- .
cu"
00
.. en
~ en
cu .-
-~
=1:
C CP
.t: a..
CP 0
" ..
.... a-
en_
s:: ...
0"""
CJ ;
~(I)
.... m
U ~
1m
() Cij
c
IIICiiI
CD
U
.~
CD
CI)
Cl)
m
fa
J)
b
m
m
CI,)
'TJ
....
ct)
.a
1m
~
CJ
~
o
..
CU
"
C
CU
E
.
C
o
c-a
,,-
cp 0
~ en
c .!!!
.-
..~
ct:
o cp
CJ a.
~ e
.ga.
-
ca=
0"
.. c
~
~ en
cu cu
- CP
=...
C <<I
.t: en
~ c
" .....
.- >C
en cp
c c
o c
U m
>t>.
." IEl!IJ
... ~
u(!)
() ~
~
Q
(!)I
~l
""
'iF
~
~
(1)1
~
JUI
11
r-- --~ .
@OJJ"i7 @(J I COt C - -. P bl- H -
~~~~~ L~~..~_Y _ouncl _~~__~arm~_ _____.________~____________________________________________~_____~___ ____
Scenario #1
Flat fees/no usage CITY COUNTY COB city
flat rate water bi-monthly monthly bi-monthly monthly vs county
flat rate water $ 19.22 $ 9.61 $ 28.84 $ 14.42 $ (4.81 )
usage rate/HCF $ $ $ $ $
sewer flat $ 57.10 $ 28.55 $ 65.66 $ 32.83 $ (4.28)
sewer usage/HCF $ $ $ $ $
stormwater $ 15.52 $ 7.76 $ 9.55 $ 4.77 $ 2.99
Waste Mgmt - 64 gal cart $ 34.98 $ 17.49 $ 39.50 $ 19.75 $ (2.26)
$ 126.82
$ 63.41
$ 143.55
$ 71.77
$(8.36) (6.10)
~ ~f) wm?
City Council Public Hearing
Scenario #2
CITY
COUNTY
Average Werner area 1 200cf 600cf 1200cf 600cf COB city
use of 12.71 per billing bi-monthly monthly bi-monthly monthly vs county
flat rate water $ 19.22 $ 9.61 $ 28.84 $ 14.42 $ (4.81 )
usage rate/HCF $ 12.48 $ 6.24 $ 18.72 $ 9.36 $ (3.12)
sewer flat $ 57.10 $ 28.55 $ 65.66 $ 32.83 $ (4.28)
sewer usage/HCF $ 45.96 $ 22.98 $ 52.80 $ 26.40 $ (3.42)
stormwater $ 15.52 $ 7.76 $ 9.55 $ 4.77 $ 2.99
Waste Mgmt - 64 gal cart $ 34.98 $ 17.49 . $ 39.50 $ 19.75 $ (2.26)
$ 185.26 $ 92.63 $ 215.07 $107.53 $(14.90)(12.64 )
!Nklu@]) ~1JfJ ~
City Council Public Hearing
Scenario #3 CITY COUNTY
usage of 2000cf 2000ef 1000cf 2000cf 1000ef COB city
per billing bi-monthly monthly bi-monthly monthly vs county
flat rate water $ 19.22 $ 9.61 $ 28.84 $ 14.42 $ (4.81 )
usage rate/HCF $ 20.80 $ 10.40 $ 31.20 $ 15.60 $ (5.20)
sewer flat $ 57.10 $ 28.55 $ 65.66 $ 32.83 $ (4.28)
sewer usage/HCF $ 76.60 $ 38.30 $ 88.00 $ 44.00 $ (5.70)
stormwater $ 15.52 $ 7.76 $ 9.55 $ 4.77 $ 2.99
Waste Mgmt - 64 gal cart $ 34.98 $ 17.49 $ 39.50 $ 19.75 $ (2.26)
$ 224.22 $112.11 $ 262.75 $131.37 $(19.26)(17.00)
~~1JfJ~
~- -. --
~~~1r!I City Council Public Hearing
Staff recommends that Council
· Hold a public hearing on the Annexation
and Interim Zoning Controls
'. Take public testimony
· Move to pass Ordinance No. 5002
~~'1JfJ ~
City Council Public Hearing
Piotential Recall Election
· Precinct 087 (West Hills Area) has 243 registered voters.
· 150 of the 243 voters, voted during the last State general
election.
· 15 qualified petitioners required to trigger recall election (100/0).
· Timing of election depends on date petition is filed, and
interpretation of state laws on annexation and election timing.
~1JgWiJfl
Page 1 of 1
Lori Smith
Il
From: Lori Smith on behalf of City Council
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:54 PM
To: Adam Brockus; Brad Gehring; Carol Arends; Dianne Robinson; Mike Shepherd; Nick Wofford;
Wendy Priest; Will Maupin
Subject: FW: Citizen Letter - West Hills Island
From: Bruce Hankins [mailto:rbruce@telebyte.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:09 AM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: [SPAM] West Hills Island
Importance: Low
From: R Bruce and Connie Hankins
5709 1 st Street
Geoffrey,
We just wanted to take the opportunity to thank you, the other city officials and council members who attended,
for the excellent informational meeting regarding the possible annexation on March 12th. We felt that we learned
enough through that forum to be completly in favor of annexation. Please pass on our thanks to all who
participated.
Let us hope that an election, if it is necessary, will bring approval. We believe that annexation, while costing a
small additional amount, would be to everyone's benefit in the long term.
Thank you again.
Bruce & Connie Hankins
312012007
Geoffrey Wentlandt
From: pamalonia [pamalonia@donobi.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21,20078:55 AM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: The Newspaper pieces March 19, March 21
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
\I\I11ile the City was able to charm Mr. Gardner to write an article that misleads West Hills residents, the story continues in my letter
to the editor today. If you read the concerns of residents in my letter to the editor, you might do better at alleviating our fears.
However, we don't want false assurances. We want the City to get real and get specific. Just so you know, of the 73 people I've
polled to date, 69 are adamently against and four are undecided.
Please note that I sent the typo of the ordinance number to the editor to read 5022; I caught my mistake and called it in to read
5002, but it was too late, evidently.
Here is a question many residents want answered tonight: are their utility extension agreements still in effect, or are they affirmed
as unconstitutional? I'm speaking of the ones they signed in the early nineties that gave the City the power of attorney to cast their
annexation vote for them, the same one that precludes them from signing an annexation petition. Several residents want to know.
The City should send them a letter at least by the date of publication of the Ordinance in the paper or make it known in the meeting
tonight whether or not this contract still holds.
----- Original Message -----
From: 9~QffI~y_Wentlandt
To: pamalonig
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:26 PM
Subject: RE: Annexation Ordinance
Thanks. We're working on that. We're looking into the best way to allow for grandfathering of pet laws, farm animals (we've
noticed there's a donkey in the area) and a clause to allow for continued non-mandatory garbage collection so people can
continue to take refuse to the dump if that's what they prefer. These clauses may be added to the ordinance, or we may pass a
separate law amending City codes for special consideration of newly annexed areas.
Sincerely,
Geoffrey WentlandtAICP
City ofl-lrcl11crtonl Citv Planncr
345 6th Sl. Suite 600 Bremerloll \VA 98337
P }60-473-5X45I f 360-473-527X
Geof f.r: ey . ~'Ven t 1 c-u1dt@ci . br eHl.e r ton. we... us
From: pamalonia [mailto:pamalonia@donobLnet]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 20074:22 PM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Annexation Ordinance
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
Please communicate to the drafters of the ordinance that we're going to need a grandfathering of county pet laws. The county
allows four cats and four dogs per licensed owner; the city allows four total.
Thank you
PamAlonia McCrary
479-5968
3/21/2007
Geoffrey Wentlandt
From: pamalonia [pamalonia@donobi.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 11: 51 AM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Re: Annexation Ordinance
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
I want to thank you for managing the questions of the participants at the meeting last night so that everyone got to fairly ask their
questions. That went well.
I want to thank the City for cooperating with us in allowing us to ask questions and hear proposals as a collective body. That went
well.
I am writing to share with you information I have received from the elections department in the Kitsap County Government office. In
our precinct there are 233 registered voters; 150 of them voted in the last November election. This means we must have the
petition signed by 16 people, which is doable. I've already got 45 people (last night I estimated 100), who want me to contact them
so they can sign the petition.
So roll up your sleeves. We're going to be contenders.
P.S. In the information I presented to people in my area in a two page argument against annexation I said this about you:
I'd like to begin by saying I've spoken numerous times to Geoffrey Wentlandt, the
signature head on the March 2, 2007 mailer you mayor may not have received. I
have found him to be generous with his disclosure of the City's position. He is
an approachable, professional City employee of the Community Planning department.
Sincerely,
PamAlonia McCrary
----- Original Message -----
From: Geoffre~ Wentlandt
To: paillc:llQnia
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:26 PM
Subject: RE: Annexation Ordinance
Thanks. We're working on that. We're looking into the best way to allow for grandfathering of pet laws, farm animals (we've
noticed there's a donkey in the area) and a clause to allow for continued non-mandatory garbage collection so people can
continue to take refuse to the dump if that's what they prefer. These clauses may be added to the ordinance, or we may pass a
separate law amending City codes for special consideration of newly annexed areas.
Sincerely,
Geoffrey WentlandtAICP
City ofl3remel1on I City flannel
34) 6th :'It. SullC 600 Rn:lIlcrtllll. \VA 98337
p. 360-473-5845 I f 360-473-5178
Ge,)ffre~'.Wen~lancit@ci.brernelton.wa.us
From: pamalonia [mailto:pamalonia@donobLnet]
3/2112007
Geoffrey Wentlandt
From: pamalonia [pamalonia@donobi.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 1: 18 PM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Re: Annexation Ordinance
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
Since the meeting today, March 12, is a public meet and greet, am I safe to assume I can set up my own table of opposition
materials? I'll be furnishing my own table and fliers.
Thanks. I look forward to meeting you.
PamAlonia McCrary
479-5968
----- Original Message -----
From: Geoffrey WentlaJldt
To: Rqma.].Qnia.
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: Annexation Ordinance
Thanks. We're working on that. We're looking into the best way to allow for grandfathering of pet laws, farm animals (we've
noticed there's a donkey in the area) and a clause to allow for continued non-mandatory garbage collection so people can
continue to take refuse to the dump if that's what they prefer. These clauses may be added to the ordinance, or we may pass a
separate law amending City codes for special consideration of newly annexed areas.
Sincerely,
Geoffrey WentlandtAICP
City ol'Rrc1l1crlonl eitv Planner
345 6th Sl. Suite 600 Bremerloll. \VA 98337
p. 360-473-5845 I f 360-473-5278
Geoffxey.Wentlandt@ci.brsmerton.w2.Ll3
From: pamalonia [mailto:pamalonia@donobLnet]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 20074:22 PM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Annexation Ordinance
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
Please communicate to the drafters of the ordinance that we're going to need a grandfathering of county pet laws. The county
allows four cats and four dogs per licensed owner; the city allows four total.
Thank you
PamAlonia McCrary
479-5968
3/21/2007
Geoffrey Wentlandt
From: pamalonia [pamalonia@donobi.net]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:41 AM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: [SPAM] Zoning and West Hills Island Annexation
Importance: Low
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
I did find the zoning laws for the city of Bremerton as they would apply to me. I own a double-city lot with a mobile home that does
not conform to the city's code, which I rent out as my subsistence income; I own a recreational vehicle on the other lot out of which I
partially live, cooking and sanitation, that does not meet the city's zoning laws, and I spend most of my time in a concrete building,
sleeping, personal time that is not considered a dwelling because it doesn't have cooking and sanitation.
What am I to do? I cannot support annexation if I have to have over my shoulder a "complaint driven" challenge. I cannot lose my
living quarters, nor can I lose my rental income, and yet both are not permitted by the city of Bremerton zoning.
Please provide in your ordinance a permanent allowance for my situation. To lose what I've got, to have to pay to replace these
structures with what the city requires, would be the very definite end of me. I am on a limited income.
Also, I have wire fencing in my back yards that are not trimmed on the outside, and I can't afford to make them look pretty.
I look forward to your response. Here are the codes:
20.46.020 FENCES AND WALLS.
(g) All fences shall present a "finished" appearance on their outside face. (Ord. 4950 9 8 (Exh. A) (part), 2005)
20.46.040 MANUFACTURED HOMES.
(a) Manufactured homes are permitted on one (1) individual parcel, lot, or tract in residential zones; provided, that the home is:
(1) Approved by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, and the appropriate certification insignia is affixed to the unit, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 4322
RCW;
(2) Comprised of at least two (2) fully enclosed parallel sections each of not less than twelve (12) feet wide by thirty-six (36) feet
long;
(3) Set upon a permanent foundation, as specified by the manufacturer, and that the space from the bottom of the home to the
ground be enclosed by concrete or an approved concrete product which can be either load-bearing or decorative;
(4) Compliant with all local design standards applicable to all other homes within the neighborhood in which the manufactured home
is to be located;
(5) Thermally equivalent to the State Energy Code;
(6) Originally constructed with and now has a composition or wood shake or shingle, coated metal, or similar roof of nominal three
to twelve (3:12) pitch or greater;
(7) Sided with exterior siding similar in appearance to materials commonly used on conventional site-built International Building
Code single-family residences; and
3/21/2007
(8) A new manufactured home as defined in RCW 35.63.160(2).
(b) A manufactured home which was legally placed and maintained prior to the date of adoption of this chapter, and does not meet
the requirements of this chapter, shall be deemed to be a nonconforming structure. If a legal nonconforming manufactured home is
partially or wholly destroyed, replaced, or altered, it shall be required to meet the relevant requirements set forth in the
nonconforming provisions of this title.
(c) The Building Official or designee shall inspect the installation of manufactured homes prior to occupancy and issue certificates of
occupancy for manufactured homes. If all requirements are met, a certificate of occupancy shall be issued. No manufactured home
shall be occupied until after the City issues a valid certificate of occupancy.
(d) If a manufactured home is replaced by another manufactured home, a new certificate of occupancy shall be required for the
installation of a manufactured home after the date of adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter. (Ord. 4950 9 8 (Exh. A)
(part), 2005)
20.46.050 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ON A PRIVATE LOT.
A recreational vehicle, occupied or not, may be parked on a private lot or lots only as an accessory use subject to the parking
provisions of this title and the following provisions:
(a) A recreational vehicle may be occupied for a cumulative period not to exceed thirty (30) days during any twelve (12) consecutive
month period;
(b) A recreational vehicle may be parked and occupied by the owner of a lot as temporary housing during the period of new house
construction on the lot for a period not to exceed one (1) year;
(c) Only one (1) recreational vehicle may be occupied on a single lot at any time;
(d) A recreational vehicle shall not be parked within a required front yard setback for more than fifteen (15) consecutive days and
not more than thirty (30) days cumulative in any twelve (12) consecutive months; and
(e) Any occupied recreational vehicle must be self-contained and all garbage and sanitation shall be disposed of in a manner
approved by the City. (Ord. 49509 8 (Exh. A) (part), 2005)
3/21/2007
Geoffrey Wentlandt
From: pamalonia [pamalonia@donobi.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 20074:51 PM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Re: Annexation Ordinance
Yes, the garbage is an issue too. I use Brem-Air twice a month, and I hardly even fill my can then; I can't afford it if I have to receive
Brem-Air weekly.
Thank you.
----- Original Message -----
From: Geoffrey Wentlandt
To: P-CLmalonlq
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: Annexation Ordinance
Thanks. We're working on that. We're looking into the best way to allow for grandfathering of pet laws, farm animals (we've
noticed there's a donkey in the area) and a clause to allow for continued non-mandatory garbage collection so people can
continue to take refuse to the dump if that's what they prefer. These clauses may be added to the ordinance, or we may pass a
separate law amending City codes for special consideration of newly annexed areas.
Sincerely,
Geoffrey WentlandtAICP
City ol"Rrclllcr!onl City Planncr
345 6th St. Suite 600 13remeltoll. W A 98337
p. 360-473-58451 r. 360-473-5278
Geoffrey.Wentlanctt@ci.bremerton.wa.us
From: pamalonia [mailto:pamalonia@donobLnet]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:22 PM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Annexation Ordinance
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
Please communicate to the drafters of the ordinance that we're going to need a grandfathering of county pet laws. The county
allows four cats and four dogs per licensed owner; the city allows four total.
Thank you
PamAlonia McCrary
479-5968
3/21/2007
Geoffrey Wentlandt
From: pamalonia [pamalonia@donobi.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:50 PM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Re: Annexation Ordinance
Thank you.
I am concerned about my property, thus I am hoping you can refer me to the city of Bremerton laws on mobile homes and
recreational vehicles. As I explained on the phone, I bought a two city lot. One side has a well-kept old mobile home; the other side
has a recreational vehicle hooked up as though it is a home. I bought the property this way. I need to know that the city has no
objection to what I have on my property. Can you refer me to the right material?
Additionally, as to the gun laws, do you have any city ordinances on them, or county? Christy has a gun, I don't know what kind,
and I assume it's licensed with the county. Would there be a difference between county's licensing and city's? I can't find this
information online. I imagine there are several people with guns in this area. Actually, I can think of several for whom annexation
would be an issue if they can't keep whatever it is they legally have now.
Thank you.
PamAlonia McCrary
----- Original Message -----
From: ~eQffI~Y Wentlandt
To: Qan:!~loniC!
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: Annexation Ordinance
Thanks. We're working on that. We're looking into the best way to allow for grandfathering of pet laws, farm animals (we've
noticed there's a donkey in the area) and a clause to allow for continued non-mandatory garbage collection so people can
continue to take refuse to the dump if that's what they prefer. These clauses may be added to the ordinance, or we may pass a
separate law amending City codes for special consideration of newly annexed areas.
Sincerely,
Geoffrey WentlandtAICP
Cily of Bremer lon' I City Planner
345 6th St. Suite 600 8rernertOtt W i\ 9X33 7
p. 360-473-5845 I r 360-473-5278
Geoffr~y.Wentlandt@ci.bremerton.wa.us
From: pamalonia [mailto:pamalonia@donobi.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:22 PM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Annexation Ordinance
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
Please communicate to the drafters of the ordinance that we're going to need a grandfathering of county pet laws. The county
allows four cats and four dogs per licensed owner; the city allows four total.
Thank you
PamAlonia McCrary
479-5968
3/21/2007
Geoffrey Wentlandt
..'n_._________.".'______'.'.'.m'"____"',._.__~._""'."."..,,",.,...'.,.__,.,,"".'"__~____'.'_"',._,_.,.'..,.____._,_._~__".".________'.__n_""'.'.,._~~_.__,.___".""___-,.'...'-,-.------,--,-.,.---'.----~----_._.,.----,.-'.,---'"---'.,-.-.--------'.,,"-~--------,.---~--
From: pamalonia [pamalonia@donobi.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:22 PM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Annexation Ordinance
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
Please communicate to the drafters of the ordinance that we're going to need a grandfathering of county pet laws. The county
allows four cats and four dogs per licensed owner; the city allows four total.
Thank you
PamAlonia McCrary
479-5968
3/21/2007
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 20074:22 PM
To: Geoffrey Wentlandt
Subject: Annexation Ordinance
Dear Mr. Wentlandt,
Please communicate to the drafters of the ordinance that we're going to need a grandfathering of county pet laws. The county
allows four cats and four dogs per licensed owner; the city allows four total.
Thank you
PamAlonia McCrary
479-5968
3/21/2007
3-~'.~b7
-T"D "~~ Ai-. ~/~ .
:J- fAA"_~; ~/~~~
g /J Jl---rv-- LU ,c-L- 1 fi' 3 leA.,
<
~ ~ ./Yl-[,/' ~&~J' ~/) ~.-c~fAi~
~ ~~ .~~~f1~
J...)~ ,10- /I~~ > ~J ~~
~ TI t~-" ~~
AJ.-.o r; ,,"J. . . ~ ~ CS ~v ,t2evzJ
.... . 0:;, J3/~~~ -' -~~ > ~~ '_
~- C", ,~~
>~." /
,_ /o.v~!~_~~' ,~ ~-t~ ~t) ~~
...!-~~~>~
. .
"'
..~<L~ ~~_
iJ{;,~-Mc~ ~ .,0
I
" Ms. Barbara Barcelon
113 Broad 81. N.
. Bremerton, WA 98312
560)-3;3 -.g>1~d
,".'"
January 9, 2007
Geoffrey Wentlandt, AICP
City of Bremerton
Community Development
345 6th Street, Suite 600
Bremerton, WA. 98337-1873
Mr. Wentlandt,
I am requesting that our property on Werner Road, parcel
4672-002-012-0007 be annexed into the City of Bremerton. I am
also requesting that this parcel be zoned for commercial\use.
I, \
/, 1') XI.. 1
^ 0 ! I r, / '. ,,/1 'I..
11 //" r /'
" IJ-Ikii /" - r. \f-"r'Z:/w~'"o~--
Sincerely, ~11' (J'.IiIifr
\ )
"
J,,-,- R R" h d
ames . IC a~ s - manager
Bergen Richards LLC
q
U
MY TURN '3 J"d-ll 07
West Hills Annex Not a "Wash" for Residents
Regarding the March 19 ar-
ticle about Bremerton
possibly annexing the West
Hills area:
Unfortunately, the piece
gives too much. favor to the
city. I am currently circulat-
ingfliers door-to-door to re-
but the city's claim that the
annexation will be "a wash."
Straight from city council's
Ordinance No. 5002that ap-
proves annexation, the city
declares it wants to annex
us residents of West Hills be-
cause it's in the city's best fi~
nancial interests. And fur-
thermore, the city states in
its ordinance that it will re-
quire us county residents to
assume all or any portion of
the city's costs to annex us.
When I asked at the meeting
March 12 how much that cost
will be, the city representa-
tives refused to give us any
idea of this dollar amount.
If the city annexes us and
runs a sewer line to our
neighborhood, and the coun-
ty health district does not re-
quire a resident .to use it be-
cause his or her septic sys-
tem is healthy,the annexed
resident will. still have to
pay. a sewer availability us-
. age fee. each month. And if a
fixed-income resident can't
afford to pay it, the city can
put a lien on. the property
and charge 8 percent inter-
est for the sewer line the res-
ident doesn't use, accord-
ing to RCW.35.67.20e. At the
meeting, we asked how much
'~vould this charge be, but the
city representatives refused
to tell us.
There are some residents.
who want sewer. When we
. asked at the meeting how
much . an installed sewer
line will cost those orus an-
nexed, even ballpark, the
city refused to answer. When
we asked how much a sewer
hookup will eost a resident,
allowing the city to ballpark
us high, mid and low ranges
based on their extensive past
experience, the city refused
to tell us.
These hidden charges are
those that many of us can't
risk taking on: indebtedness,
sewer availability usage,
sewer lines, sewer hookups,
. and storm water charges.
The city's worksheet said
a $7.50 per month charge
would be assessed for storm-
water, which comes to $90
per year. However, I know for
a fact that a city stormwa-
ter charge can be $14.75 per
month, which is double what
the city says it will be.
Also, the city does not take
into account that for senior
citizens and disabled per-
sons who receive property
tax exemptions, this popula-
tion will feel the full weight
of the stormwater charges
that they currently don't pay
while these charges are on
their Kitsap County proper-
ty tax bills. In addition, rent-
al tenants who pay water
bills will be greatly affected,
too, because the stormwater
charges, which are currently
in the owner's county prop-
erty taxes, will then be fully
absorbed by the tenants who
pay for their water.
The annexation will not be
a wash - a break-even deal
- for county residents. But
the city doesn't want to tell
us these hidden costs.
So far, the city has been
terribly disingenuous, if not
outright misleading and se-
cretive about what the an-
nexation is going to cost us
in hard dollars and cents.
For these reasons, I have to
lead the fight against annexc
ation.
Pamalonia McCrary
BREMERTON
FILE