HomeMy WebLinkAbout2702 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2702
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, regarding the
adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 98-0001
WHEREAS, the State of Washington required that the City of Bremerton prepare a
Comprehensive Plan consistent with the requirements of WAC 365-195, The Growth Management
Act (GMA); and
WHEREAS, the City adopted a Comprehensive Plan in April 1995 after completing
environmental review consistent with the requirements of the WAC 197-11 the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), holding noticed public hearings, and taking comment from the
public, other jurisdictions and agencies; and
WHEREAS, following an appeal and related corrections, the Comprehensive Plan was
readopted by ordinance No. 4545 on February 21, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the GMA requires that Comprehensive Plans be amended no more than once
per year, excepting those amendments which are necessary to implement the plan, or to address an
emergency; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan contains Element K - Implementation, Consistency
and Concurrency, which provides procedures and review criteria associated with amending the
plan; and
WHEREAS, Element K requires that the all amendment proposals be considered'
concurrently (in a package) by the Planning Commission and the City Council so that their
cumulative effects can be ascertained; and
WHEREAS, throughout the year, applications for Plan Amendments have been collected
and placed on a docket for processing together after April 1 consistent with the schedule contained
within Element K.; and
WHEREAS, six (6) applications for revisions to the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive
Plan's Land Use and/or the Official Zoning Map were received on or before the deadline for receipt
of applications; and
WHEREAS, the City has proposed amendments to the Land Use, Transportation, and
Capital Facilities Elements of the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City-initiated amendments have been included in the docket, and will be
reviewed concurrent with the other applications for amendment; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to I~CW 36.70A. 106(3), the proposed amendment has been reviewed
by the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development 60 days before final
action on the proposed amendment; and
WHEREAS, environmental review consistent with the requirements of SEPA (WAC 197-1
1 ) was initiated by the City, and resulted in the issuance of a Determination of Non-significance
(DNS) on September 2nd, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the docket in workshop session on May
19th and August 25th 1998; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on September 15th, 1998 for
the purpose of receiving and considering testimony concerning the proposed docket; and
WHEREAS, the meeting was property noticed and open to the public; and
WHEREAS, the Suquamish Tribe filed an appeal on the Determination of Nonsigni~cance
and has subsequently withdrawn its appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on August 18, 1999, for the purpose of
receiving and considering testimony concerning the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and
appeal; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council considered each application in
order to evaluate consistency with the approval criteria contained in Element K;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Bremenon
finds the Determination of Nonsignificance adequate and that the proposed amendment:
1. Is consistent with the GMA and not result in conflicts between the plan and regulations;
2. Will not create significant adverse impacts on existing sensitive land uses, businesses or
residents;
3. Can be accommodated by all applicable public services and facilities including
transportation;
4. Help implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; and
5. Has been sent to State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development
and Kitsap County for review and comment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Bremerton adopts
Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA 98-0001 with attendant amendments to the Official Zoning
Map of the City of Bremerton, subject to the removal of any reference to rioride within the text of
the Capital Facility Element as shown in Exhibit A.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Bremenon this 18th day of day of
August, 1999.
MIKE SHEPHERD, Council President
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
Proposed Text Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
The following revisions to the City of Bremerton Comprehensive,, Plan are suggested to support the
designation of additional industrial lands outside of the Urban Growth Area, but within the Joint
Planning Area, and the annexation of such lands into the City of Bremenon. Specifically, the
following text amendments support additional land for industrial development purposes.
Based on our review of the Plan and information prepared to date, the proposed annexation of
additional lands will adequately meet the industrial land use needs of the community, and is consistent
with the vision, goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Sh ike out is deleted text Double underline is additional text
Element C Planning Goals
Goal #1 Urban Growth (Page 1)
Encourage development in urban amu where adequate public facilities and, services exist or can be
provided in an efficient manner.
A. Accommodate now devdopment with care that Bremerton will be a "most livable city" made
up of ;strong, healthy neighborhoods, workplaces and activity centers.
B. Group higher density development convenient to community activities and busy streets to
strengthen the identity of Bremerton's neighborhoods.
C. Approve only those annexation requests that are for lands within the designated Urban
Growth Area, or witlfin an Urban Joint Plam~ing Area, as identified on the Kit sap County
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map that can be effectively served by all needed public
facilities, and that will result in long-term benefits to the community.
D. Ensure that adequate land area has been designated to accommodate identified needed land
uses, including residential, commercial and industrial lands.
Goal #5 Economic Development (Page 3)
Encourage econormc development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted
comprehensive plans, provide economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for
unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient
economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public
facilities.
A. Develop a strong, healthy, diversified economy that supports and protects Bremerton's quality
of life.
B. Accent the roles of small businesses, light industrial or technological develot~ment, tourism,
health services, education, and social and cultural activities in diversifying Bremerton's
economy.
Element E Land Use Item # 3: Goals and Policies of the Vision for Bremenon
A. Planning Goals and City Policies
State Goal #1 Urban Growth (Page 2)
Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be
provided in an efficient manner,
Supporting policies:
(1) Collaborate with Kitsap County and other affected jurisdictions to ensure that the Urban
Growth Area will be based on recognized urban development patterns, good access, efficient
provision of utilities and public facilities, and projected growth needs.
(2) Coordinate the timing of new development with the upgrading or extension of needed
municipal services.
(3) Accommodate new development with care so that Bremerton will continue to be a well-
balanced "most livable city".
(4) Group higher intensity development convenient to community activities and busy streets to
strengthen the identity of Bremerton's neighborhoods.
(5) Continue to provide municipal governmental services within the Urban Growth Area, while
ensuring that the plans of Bremerton, Kitsap County and other affected jurisdictions are
coordinated and consistent
(6) Ensure that modifications to the designated Urban Growth Area or annexation requests are
based on demonstrated need for the additional land and proposed uses, and/or are consistent
with the U, ban Joint Platruing Areas identified in the Kitsap Coumy Comprehensive Plan.
State Goal #2 Reduce Sprawl (Page 3)
Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low density development
Supporting Policies:
(1) Ensure that sufficient land areas are available and appropriate zoning is in place to allow the
level of new development that is needed to accommodate Bremerton's twenty-year
population allocation.
(2) Adjust development guidelines and regulations to prevent development that is inappropriate
low and that might waste valuable urban lands.
(3) Assist Kitsap County in designating the Urban Growth Area large enough to accommodate
our expected growth and demonstrated need, but not so large that it will allow inefficient low-
density urban sprawl development.
(4) Work with Kitsap County to develop an Urban Growth Management Agreement (UGMA),
as required by the Countywide Planning Policies, to better govern all lands within the Urban
Growth Area or the Urban Joint Planning Areas.
(5) Promote the concept of development clustering to conserve energy, save land, lower public
costs, reduce sprawl, and provide open space.
State Goal #5: Economic Developynent (Page 4-5)
Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive
plans, provide economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for
disadvantaged persons, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth,
all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities.
Supporting policies:
(1) Promote a strong, stable local economy that retains existing jobs, assists in economic
expansion, promotes economic diversification, maintains environmental quality, and protects
our quality of life.
(2) Provide sufficient land use and development oppommities to ensure that Bremerton continues
to provide a wide variety of job and business opportunities, and continues to be a major
economic center of Kitsap County.
(3) Seek ways to attract and accommodate new kinds of business, home-based business, and
industrial or technological diversification opportunities to offset the anticipated decline in
federal or mililitary-related local jobs.
(4) Ensure that proper zoning and expeditious development regulations are in place to
accommodate new commercial, industrial, tourism, and other business-related development.
(5) Review and streamline, as necessary, the City's governmental and permitted processes to
ensure quick responses to potential investors, developers, homeowners, and others seeking
to build, live or do business within the City.
(6) Ensure the availability of adequate public services and utilities to all sites.
(7) Protect quality well-located industrial lands from being lost to higher value commercial or
other non-industrial competing uses.
(8) Encourage the development of sub-area plans for Urban Joint Planning Areas based on
demonstrated need for the additional land and proposed uses, availability urban services,
adequate transportation facilities. and public benefit.
(9) Cooperate with regional governments and local agencies as the Economic Development
Council of Kitsap County CEDCKC) to identify land use needs and employment trends to
ensure stable economy.
State Goal # 8 Natural Resource Industries (Page 5)
Maintain and enhance natural resource -based industries including productive timber, agricultural and
fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of productive forest lands and productive agricultural
lands, and discourge incompatible uses.
Supporting Policies
(1) Bremerton will continue to discourage costly and land intensive sprawl in rural areas by
providing opportunities for new development concentrated at higher urban densities within
the City, Urban Growth Area or the Urban Joint Planning Areas.
SECTION C. CONSISTENCY WITH REGIONAL PLANS (Page 6)
(Identifies Vision 2020, Puget Sound Regional Council, as the "Primary Regional Plan:. Identifies
"regional vision" as embodied in Multicounty Planning Policies."
In addition, the City of Bremerton will consider regional economic forecasts and studies, such as the
Industrial Land Market Analysis. prepare by the Economic Development Council of Kitsap County,
in determining land uses required to ensure that the City of Bremerton provides adequate areas for
anticipated land uses.
Supporting Policy: (Page 7)
Bremerton agrees with the overall intent and direction of the regional Vision 2020 Plan and-the
Multicounty Planning Policies. and the regional economic forecast prepared bv the Economic
Development Council, and will continue to support regional planning coordination and consistency
of plans and programs.
Element 1t Capital Facilities
A. Goal: (Page 14)
Provide high quality, well maintained physical systems and facilities that serve the needs of the
community, are, or can feasibly be made available at the time of development to serve new growth,
and are equitably distributed.
Policies: (Page 16)
7. Growth Rate: Foster orderly, desirable growth in appropriate locations at a rate consistent with
demonstrated land use needs, citizen desires and the provision of adequate services and facilities.
Element K- Implementation, Consistency and Concurrence Element
D. Annexation Policies (Page 10)
It is the policy of the City of Bremerton to promote planned community growth through annexation
within our Urban Growth Area or within the Joint Platoring Area.
Objective B: To consider annexations that best meet the growth goals and policies of the City and
region.
Objective C: To consider annexations that preserve established neighborhoods and community
identities, or serve a demonstrated need.
Objective D: To cooperate with Kitsap County and other jurisdictions in addressing areawide
comprehensive planning zoning and service provision to areas outside it's corporate
limits but within the Urban Growth Area, or the Joint Planning Area.
4. Urban Growth Policies
Goal #1 (C)Urban Growth: Approve only those annexation requests that are for lands within the
designated Urban Growth Area, or within an Urban Joint Plam~ing Area as identified on the Kitsal~
County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map that can be effectively served by all needed public
facilities and services, and that will result in long-term benefits to the community.
Supporting Policies:
(6) Facilitate am~exation of identified Urban Joint Plam~ing Areas for areas that set ,,e a
demonstrated need based on population projections or land use capacity, analysis. zmd
can be adequately se~ ¢ed by the necessa~ ~t itfft ash uctare.
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
ELEMENT F
TRANSPORTATION
A. PURPOSE OF THIS ELEMENT
As an important element of the Comprehensive Plan, the Transportation Element
must be consistent with all other elements and will assist Bremerton in moving
toward its vision and goals. This element will not simply promote more parking lots
and wider streets. It will encourage efficient multimodal and intermodal
transportation systems that will give our citizens an array of mobility options. It will
address bicycle and pedestrian facilities, mass transit, ferry service and other
components of transportation.
This element also recognizes that there are more than three million registered
automobiles in this state. We are traveling 50 billion miles per year and consuming
roughly three billion gallons of fuel. While we work on mobility alternatives, we can't
ignore the importance of the family car, motorcycles, service vehicles, 18-wheelers,
and the many other types of motor vehicles that presently serve our needs.
The systems and strategies proposed in this element are based on regional
priorities but also coordinated with the comprehensive plans of our neighboring
cities and Kitsap County. The proposals within this Element will be consistent with
those plans and will contribute in a positive way to the regional transportation
"system" that we all share.
A well-coordinated regional transportation system will enhance the efficient
movement of people, goods and services at optimum levels of safety, economy and
energy efficiency while also helping to reduce urban sprawl and other undesirable
development patterns.
B. STUDY AREA
The Transportation Element covers all areas within the City limits of Bremerton. If
the City's Comprehensive Plan is expanded to include areas beyond the City limits,
such as a smaller Urban Growth Area, of Area of Mutual Concerns, or Urban Joint
Planning Area, the Transportation Element will be expanded to ensure adequate
services to those areas as well. Some aspects of this element will deal with
transportation services that connect us with other areas, but are not fully within the
City, such as ferry and transit services. Figure 1 shows the study area for the
Transportation Element.
Transportation ~ Page 1
· increased transit use,
· implementation of additional intra-county passenger ferries,
· spreading of the peak hour - as a facility becomes increasingly congested, some
of the demand tends to shift to other times of the day, resulting in a spread of the
peak hour,
· increased bicycle use, and
· other demand management strategies such as telecommuting.
Therefore, adjustments to the future volumes for Scenarios 3 and 6 were quantified to
reflect the potential of these "non-traditional" transportation strategies. The results of
these adjustments in the three major travel corridors, Manette Bridge, Kitsap Way, and
Warren Bridge are summarized in Table 6.
For Scenario 3, the non-traditional travel demand adjustments could reduce the total peak
hour volumes by approximately 10 percent. The largest reductions would occur from
increased transit use and peak hour spreading. The level of service standards would still
be exceeded on the Manette and Warren Bridges; however, the LOS on Kitsap Way would
improve to LOS D.
For Scenario 6 with a new four-lane crossing of the Port Washington Narrows, the non-
traditional adjustments would improve the future PM peak hour LOS to LOS E on the '
Manette and Warren Bridges, and to LOS D on Kitsap Way. Therefore, assuming that
these non-traditional travel demand adjustments would occur in the future with Scenario
6, all streets in the City of Bremerton would operate at LOS E conditions or better.
Supplemental Scenario
The City has revised potential demands on transportation from light industrial/business
park development of the Port Blakely property located westerly of Kitsap Lake. In
performing this review and to assist in the preparation of a subarea plan, the City revised
it's Transportation Demand Forecasting Model to address trip generation associated with
the project. Adequate capacity was found to be available (with anticipated system
improvements) to accommodate the project.
Transportation - Page 38
DRAFT REVISIONS
September 8, 1998
Brernerton Comprehensive Plan
CAPITAL FACILITIES
ELEMENT
Part 2 of 2: Capital Facilities Program
Prepared by:
BREMERTON PLANNING
Adopted: April 5, 1995
Amended: October 23, 1996
Amended: September 1997
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
ELEMENT H
CAPITAL FACILITIES
Part 2 of 2: Capital Facilities Pro_qram
CONTENTS
Pa.qe
1. INTRODUCTION - NO REVISIONS - NOT INCLUDED IN DRAFT
A. AUTHORITY ..........................................................................................CFP-1
B. OVERVIEW ...........................................................................................CFP-1
C. DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................CFP-2
D. BACKGROUND .....................................................................................CFP-3
E. SCOPE ..................................................................................................CFP-3
F. PURPOSE AND INTENT .......................................................................CFP -5
G. DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDMENT PROCESS ................................... CFP - 6
2. CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM (CFP)
A. OVERVIEW (REVISED) .....................................................................'...CFP- 8
B. FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES .................................... CFP - 12
C. LAW ENFORCEMENT ...........................................................................CFP - 20
D, MUNICIPAL (REVISED) ........................................................................CFP - 27
E. PARKS & RECREATION (REVISED) ....................................................CFP - 33
F. SANITARY SEWER (REVISED) ...........................................................CFP - 44
G. SCHOOLS .............................................................................................CFP - 51
H. STORMWATER (REVISED) .................................................................CFP - 58
I, TRANSPORTATION ..............................................................................CFP - 63
J. WATER (REVISED) ..............................................................................CFP - 66
K. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN (REVISED) ................................................CFP - 77
2. Capital Facilities Pro,ciram (CFP)
An Inventory, Analys~s, and Six-Year Financing Plan
A. Overview
The Capital Facilities Program (CFP) is a six-year document which provides the main support for
all actions that satisfy the policy intent of the long-range Capital Facilities Plan. This Program
contains an inventory of existing and proposed capital facilities; forecasts future needs for
facilities; and identifies deficiencies in capital facilities and the actions necessary to meet such
deficiencies. It also provides the GMA-required six-year finance plan to fund the needed capital
facility improvements and projects for the next six years.
The inventory presented in the Capital Facilities Program provides background information on
those capital facilities for which the City has a responsibility. It also summarizes new capital
improvement projects for the existing population, new capital improvement projects necessary for
the growth projected through 2000, and major repair, renovation, or replacement of existing
facilities.
The six-year finance plan contains funding and scheduling of individual projects for all capital
facilities including transportation and utility facilities. Detailed financial plans of outside agencies
and special districts are included by reference.
1. Types and Providers of Capital Facilities
The chart on the following page lists the types and providers of capital facilities
addressed by this Proc~ram. (Table CFP-l Sections on each facility type follow in
alphabetical order.
The analysis of each type of capital facility includes:
· Inventory of Existing Facilities
· Forecast of Future Needs
· Level of Service Standards
· Need for FaCility Capital improvements
· Plans of Other Providers
· Planned Capital improvement Projects
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program CFP - 8 1998-09-08
CFP Overview
.. . ~
F~ili~Ty~ P~ ' ~H~i~n., "' ~_ ApPl~b~ Ran(s)
Fire and C~ of Pro~d~ fadl~ that sup~ ~e pro~on of
Emergen~ Breme~on Fire fire and emergen~ se~c~,
~Se~c~ De~L
Law C;~ of Pro~d~ facil~ ~at suppo~ the provision of · DraR Breme~on Fac/l~ies
Enforcement 9reme~on !~ enforcement se~c~. Study, 1985
Police Dept
Municipal City of Provides municipal buildings and parking Draft Bremerton Facilities
Bremerton structures. Study, 1985
Parks City of Provides facili'des for passive and active Land Use E/ement
Bremerton recreational activities, Parks &Recreation
Parks & ComprehensNe Plan. 1995'
Recreation
Dept
Streets City of Provides streets, sidewalks, traffic controls, · Transporfation Element
Bremerton and street lighting. · Six-Year Transportation
DepL of Pubiic Improvement Program (TIP),
Works & 1997
Utilities
Sanitary Sewer Bremerton Provides facilities used in collection, · Wastewater Comprehensive
Municipal transmission, storage, treatment or discharge Plan, 1996
Wastewater of waterborne waste within most developed
Utility portions of city and some surrounding
unincorporated areas.
Schools Bremerton Provides elementan/and secondary facililjes · Bremertcn School Distdct
School Distnct for instruction in the several branches of Capital Facilities Plan: In
learning and study required by the Basic Supped of the School Impact
Education Code of the State of Washington. Fee Program, July 1992
Storm Water Bremerton Provides facilities that collect and transport ·Ord. 4454
Management Municipal stormwater runoff. Bremerton Stormwater
Stormwater Management Plan, 1995
Utility
Water Bremerton Provides supply of potable water from system · Water System
Municipal of surface water and wells. Service area Comprehensive Plan, 1992
Water Utility includes developed portions of city and
surrounding unincorporated areas. Utility
also contracts to provide water to additional
areas (Tracyton, Rocky Point, PSNS, and
Port of Bremerton airport and industrial park.
2. Growth Assumptions
The CFP is base. d on the following population assumptions:
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program CFP - 9 1998-09-08
Year Population
1996 38,500
2001 41,893
2012 58,142
The 1996 population estimate was prepared by the Bremerton Department of Community
Development. Bremerton's population fluctuates regularly with shifts in PSNS staff levels.
The State Office of Financial Management (OFM) prepares quarterly updates
documenting changes in Navy population counts. This 1996 estimate represents an
average of recent OFM quarterly updates.
The year 2001 population forecast was prepared by the City. It represents continuation of
existing growth trends until at least year 2001. This forecast is based on the assumption
that the effects of Growth Management goals to promote infill in urban areas will not be
seen in the city until some interval after Kitsap County adopts policies and regulations to
limit sprawl in the unincorporated areas. This forecast is illustrated in the chart on the
following page.
The year 2012 population forecast was approved by the Kitsap Regional Planning Council
in 1995 for use by Kitsap County in complying with the Growth Hearings Board order to
revise the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan.
CFP 97 Introduction
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program CFP- 10 1998~09-08
CFP Overview
~:.::~ ',, ,,: ,,,, ,,: ,, ,;:,,,,, - ~
,, ,,,,,:, ,, ,=:,, . ~ ~;
'.:. ':.'.¥[ ~,.? ....
~: ". ..::
~ ~ Popula~on
I~1 ~':"""'~""" ~;~::~'~' ' 'F :. :..' ~ c.'.. ~ "'
~ ~:" .;~,~;,,~,,~..,~. ~.~ .. .... ~.~ . ... ,~ . ~. .'~ ,: .
1~ ~ ........ ..:L '~ . "... '~'
~ . ,::~ ..:~: .. ~...;.. ~ .
Ig~ ~ ',7:'[.~,::r.~.'.,'j~::[~" ~,.. :.. ~.. .. ~., ,.: ~ ..... ..
.............. ]:...:..:j..: ',
~ ~:: . '.~; f:.:.'D;'f' ~': ,~.. ,. :~' ~ :: .. ....F.v .', .:' ..i" [. [~. , .
. ,' . . ..':::...~.
~ ~:',:'. "....{. i"" .. ,:~'~'.. j:, [,. "..k' ,'i' ' .... "'
I~ ~ .. : .. .:
...[
I~7 ~ .F....'. ,:.j.."L~'::.'.:..:,.. .~.. . ..[,:"~'~: ~: ~ ' . ~' :. ~..'7
f - :.j:"",'.:9 .":' .~ [ .....~..'.:. i...~ .'b:':
' I~ ~ ' "'~" . [:
~I ~ " :' ' o
~2~ ~. 'i ... .~ ." [,
~ : .... .:. . [ .. . i.
, . : , :
~7 " ":' "':~ :: ~" :" ~ "' ' ......
~ ' .'[...:... . [ . . ~ ; .. :. ...
~ ~ ............ Z. ..........Z ......L_.~ .......~_.~; .....L".;.:..= ....... ~ ..
~'... ;~ . :.'.~ . i. ~ '
~10 ~--~ ..................:_ _ _:__: ................Lb ._' "' i' ': ' ' ' ' . '
~1 h """" ' [ ""' :' ' "" ' [ ":~ ' ~ ' ':" " "':" '
~12 {T~'; ..... ' '~' ""'" '" ': ': ....... ] . ." .. L. . "~ '~'
.......... F:--=---,-~ .... ~ ......... - ........................;.-' - .....,:[..'.: [:': '
Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 11 Capital Facilities Program
B. Fire and Emergency Medical Services
The City of Bremerton Fire Department is responsible for providing emergency and non-
emergency fire, rescue and medical services. The capital facilities used by the Fire Department
include station buildings, emergency medical services (EMS) vehicles, fire trucks, fire engines
and fire boats. (See F/gum CF-1)
1. Emerqencv Medical Services (EMS)
a. Inventory of Existinq Facilities -- EMS
The City has three EMS vehicles. Two units (Medic #2 and Medic #3) each cover
half of the city, while one (Medic #2-A) is maintained as a reserve unit to fill in as
needed. Under the Citys rotation policy, EMS units are replaced every three
years. Each time a new unit is added, the reserve unit is replaced by the next
oldest unit. (Table EM-1)
Table EM-1 · '
Irtvent0ry of ExiSting Facilities - Emergency Medical SerViceS.. ' : ;
"i ..... ':"'
· EMSVehicie " ".. '. Service Area " :' ' .!" Unit'Capacity
ACtive. Units .... ...
Medic fr2 Callow Avenue to West Bremerton City Limits 1
Medic fr3 Callow Avenue to Downtown to East Bremerton City Limits 1
.................. Total Active Units = 2
Reserve Units '
Medic ¢r2-A Ck"y-wide (replacement for fr2 & #3) 1
Medic #3-A C/b/-wide 1
Total Reserve Units = 2
Total Units= 4
Source: Bremerton Fire Department
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 12 1998-09-08
Fire and Emergency Services
b. Forecast of Future Needs - EMS
(1) Existinq Demand
Between 75-80% of Kjtsap County CenCom (Central Communications)
calls are for EMS, Over the last five years there has been a 5.4% per year
increase in ConCorn population has not grown. This is due to a
combination of factors, including an aging population, a concentration of
convalescent centers and retirement homes near the hospital, and an
economy in which people may tend to call for EMS to avoid the expense of
a doctor. Some 96% of the calls for service are inside the city limits. The
current response time is about 4.6 minutes for all responses. There are
deviations in some areas, such as the golf course. These are handled
through mutual aid agreements with other fire districts.
(2) Level of Service {LOS)
The level of service for EMS facilities is a function of response time and '
call volumes. These in turn are dependent on the number and location of
fire stations, the number of fire apparatus units, and the number of
firefighters available. The City is developing a LOS monitoring system
that measures EMS response time (time needed to respond to a call) and
call volumes (the number of calls received from different areas). In the
meantime, the need for EMS facilities can be estimated by monitoring
response times. The Amedcan Heart Association recommends a 4.0
minute EMS response time for Basic Life Support (BLS) and an 8.0 minute
response time for Advanced Life Support (ALS). Past these times, a heart
patient's chance of survival goes down significantly.
· Current LOS = 4.6 minutes for BLS and ALS (or 3.3 minutes
90% of the time)
· Proposed LOS = 5.0 minutes for BLS
8.0 minutes for ALS
(3) Future Demand
Bremerton's population is expected to grow by 3,410 by year 2000, and by
an additional 16,590 by year 2014. CenCom projects a two-fold increase
in calls between 1992 and 2005, The City is expected to continue to
receive about half of these calls regardless of whether the population
increases. (Table EM-2)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 13 1998-09-08
Fire and Emergency Services
Table F_,M-2
SiXteen Year Need: EMS
Time Period Demand (Population). EMS units required ~ LOS 5.OlSJ}
_ . minute response times ·
· Six-Year Need
1996 38,500 3
1997-2001 (new) 3.393 O
'
! Total as of 2001 = 41,893 3
Sixteen-Year Need
2002-2012 (:new) 16.249 1
Total as of 2012 = 58.142 4
1996-2012 ,:new) 19.542 1
Source: Bre.merton Ere Department
(4) Need for Capital Facility Improvements
The anticipated total need for year 2014 is four EMS units -- three active
EMS units and one reserve unit. Mutual aid agreements will satisfy other
needs.
(5) Plans of Other Providers
The September 1994 Kitsap County Draft Capital Facilities Element
recommends a five-minute response time (from time of call to first unit on
site) in urban areas, and a ten-minute response time in rural areas. To
provide this LOS, it recommends that stations be located within a five-mile
radius of each other, and that a 24-hour career staffed station be located
within 10 miles of all areas. It uses replacement schedules for EMS/Aid
units based on a five-year replacement cycle, unless otherwise stated.
(6) Proposed Facilities
The City will need one additional EMS unit at Station #1 sometime within
the next five years. Existing EMS units are scheduled to be replaced
every three years. However, the replacement schedule may be moved up
to every two years if call volumes continue to increase.
c. Six-Year Financing Plan - EMS
The six-year financing plan for emergency medical service facilities is included in
Section K of this Capital Facilities Program.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 14 1998-09-08
Fire and Emergency Services
2. Fire Protection Services
a. Inventory of Existincl Facilities - Fire Protection
The City has three fire stations, one each located in west, central and east
Bremerton. The City also has one drill tower/boat house, which is due to be
demolished. There are seven fire apparatus and two specialty vehicles. Three of
six fire engines are reserve units, on stand-by to replace the three active units.
Although there are seven fire apparatus, three engines are not staffed. The
ladder truck, fireboat, and rescue crew are staffed by the Engine #1 crew. (Table
FP-1)
" ' Table FP-1 " :
· InventOry of Existing. Facilities - Fire Protection .... '. .'.
Facility Name i " : "Address i Unit: "..,..
: ' ':' " ! 'Capacity.
Buildings Size (square feeti' . "
Fire Station No. 1 817 Pacific 15,346
Max Meigs Fire Station No. 2 5005 Kitsap Way 9,389
Ted Tillet Fire Stal~on No. 3 3031 Olympus Ddve 1 7,640
Total Buildings = 32.375
· · .i.. . ....
Fire Apparatus SePtice Area .." ':' i : '
Fire Trucks
Ladder #1 All of City Limits 1
Total Fire Trucks = 1
Fire Engines
Engine #1 Downtown Bremerton to Callow Avenue 1
Engine #1-A (Reserve) Same as Engine #1 1
Engine ~ Callow Avenue to West Bremedon City Limits 1
Engine ~2-A (Reserve) Same as Engine #2 1
Engine #3 East Bremerton to City Limits 1
Engine #3-A (Reserve Same as Engine #3 1
Total Fire Engines = 6
Total Fire Apparatus = 7
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 15 1998-09-08
Fire and Emergency Services
Marine-20 Fireboat Sinclair and Dyes Inlets 1
Total = I
b. Forecast of Future Needs - Fire Protection
(1) Existinq Demand
The City has three fire stations and four active fire apparatus serving
about 38,500 persons - approximately one station per 12,833 people, and
one fire apparatus unit per 9,625 people. The current response time is
about 5.44 minutes for both emergency and non-emergency calls. The
City has a Class 3 insurance rating based on manpower, water supply,
etc.
(2) Level of Service (LOS)
The need for fire protection facilities is a function of response time and call
volumes. These in turn are dependent on the number and location of fire'
stations, the number of fire apparatus units, and the number of firefighters
available, Until the City's monitoring system can be further quantified, fire
facilities needs can be estimated by monitoring response times.
· Current LOS = 5.44 minutes response time for both
emergency and non-emergency calls.
· Proposed LOS = 5.0 minutes response time.
(3) Future Demand
The projected population growth within the service area is for
approximately 3,393 new people by year 2001, and an additional 16,249
new people by 2014. (Table FP-2)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 16 1998-09-08
,,.,/
Fire and Emergency Services
·Tabie FP~Z
Sixteen. Year Need: Fire Protec'don Apparatus
Time Period ~ Demand Fire Protection Units Requiro~f @ LOS 5.44
. (Populalion) -' minute response tim
Six-Year Need
!996 38.500] 3
1997-2001 (new~ 3.393 J 0
Total as of 2001 = 41,893 j 3
Twenty-Year Need
2002-2012 (new~ 16,249 4
Total as of 2012 = 58.142 7
19~6-2012 (new) 19.642 4
Source: Breme~on Fire Gepartment
(4) Need for Capital Facility Improvements
The anticipated total need for year 2014 is seven fire apparatus. No
additional buildings will be needed.
(5) Plans of Other Providers
The September 1994 Kjtsap County Draft Capital Facilities Plan
recommends a five-minute response time (from time of call to first unit on
site) in urban areas. To achieve this LOS it recommends that stations be
located within a five mile radius of each other to provide blanket coverage
throughout the county. The element uses replacement schedules for most
vehicles based on a 20-year replacement cycle, and for rescue vehicles
based on a 1 O-year cycle, unless otherwise stated.
6) Proposed Facilities
(a) Buildinqs
The City, in partnership with several Fire Districts, plans to replace
the existing drill tower with a more suitable facility.
(b) Fire Apparatus
Because the City currently has seven apparatus, no additional
apparatus will be needed. However, the City will need to replace
its existing fire engines toward the end of the 20 year period, and
additional crews will be needed to staff all seven apparatus. No
change in the existing number of stations will be needed.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 17 1998-09-08
Fire and Emergency Services
c. Six-Year Financinq Plan - Fire Protection
The six-year financing plan for fire protection facilities is located in Section K of
this Capital Facilities Program.
CFP Fire 1998
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 18 1998-09-08
and Emer'Genc'! Medical Services
Figure CF-3 Bremerton Fire Department Facilities
DRAFT Capital Faciiiljes Program 19 1998-09-08
C. Law Enforcement
1. Inventory of Existinq Facilities -- Law Enforcement
The capital facilities used by the Police Department are buildings and vehicles for patrol
officers, investigations officers and administrative staff. (Since the cost of vehicles is less
than the $35,000 capital facilities threshold, these costs are included in the City's Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and Annual Budget, but not in the Capital Facilities
ElernenL )
The Police Department is currently spread out over four facilities in four different
locations. Administrative functions are concentrated in City Hall, convenient to the
Municipal Court. A new Community Resources office is located in a store front setting
next door to City Hail. However, the Patrol Division is housed in the West Precinct, along
with the Animal Control Division, and the Drug and Gang units are located in the old
Capital Hill Fire Station. (See Figure CF42) (The City currently contracts with Kjtsap
County for jail services.) (Table LE-1)
Table LE-1
Inventor'/of Existing Facilities - Law Enforcement
...
Fac iliZtY__.~_a_.m..e_ .......................- ........L__oca..tio...n_ .......: ._S..iz_e ¢.~_sq._ff.:) ....
i
3.:'~ -aP.. F :;,. co
..... !
!_:_,-._....:.--u_~._~., =:_~!,:_c...:,-,._~,,-_: ........................_2_-._s
;;::.s; ='c'-c.'~c'.Fr..,'r::. ~-'-::.~:c',':uar-e,s ' ." '~ Co'ft.' :
.................................. ·
· .q,..o :.,,,/,
~..:~ r'c;.;.:';rn,'!l "' ........' ' ~ 4c:,,
........ "'_ ........ ~"'."' .'_ ~C"i"~ 'L:O CO..r'te.r '~%':.!.v .. '
:~:):.:":~.:. '" :'S :'r.? S:g...":.:::'..S::ec.a: 'f"vc-s;,crl:',e '...-.T S,I .'"'^~' ?.×:):StrE. et 5 -'CC:
i
'j:'.'~.l =
,'.:.: ,'1. I :' :: % "'~!,:::i:'i:.% .%:'?.:':~!"t:."",:-'~ :. ~'.,"":;:I'.V~".'
and Bremerton Police Department.
2. Forecast of Future Needs -- Law Enforcement
a. Existinq Demand
The City has 62 law enforcement officers operating out of approximately 18.000
square feet of buildings -- 290 square feet per officer (including support staff).
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 20 1998-09-08
Law Enforcement
b. Level of Service (LOS)
The need for law enforcement facilities can be estimated by projecting the number
of officers that will be needed to serve the ferecasted population, and calculating
the building space needed per officer. Currently, with 62 officers, there is one
officer per 615 persons.
There is no consensus an staffing levels for local police departments. The ratio of
both officers and total police employees to population size is significantly related
to crime rates. However, there are many vadabtes that enter into crime rates.
Such standards have limited meaning because the actual number required will
vary depending on the size of a city, geographic region, and type of city. Even
cities of the same population size and type may differ widely in staffing needs
because of differences in demographics, socio-economic characteristics, climate
or other unique conditions. Washington State cities as a whole have an average
of 1.6 officers per 1,000 population. Bremerton's staffing level is the same as the
state average. Compared with available staffing levels from several Washington
cities, Bremerton's staffing level falls between Yakima, which has a higher
population, and Des Moines, which has a lower population.~
City Population Officers/1000
Seattle (1989) 531,400 3.06
Yakima 54,843 1.7
Washington average -- 1.6
Bremerton 38,500 1.6
Des Moines 21,330 1.5
Moses Lake 12, 190 1.9
Poulsbo 5,415 2.3
The Police Department feels that its current staffing level is too low, given the
Citys crime rate. The Department recommends that 70 officers could provide a
preferred level of service for the existing population. While the City's staffing level
is the same as the state average, it may be that escalating cdme rates are
catching many cities short of staff.
Another difficulty in linking staff levels to population in Bremerton is that the City's
population fluctuates up and down with Navy population levels. For example,
Bremerton's population dropped from 38,142 in 1990 to a low of 35,920 in Apdl
1994. tn 1995 it climbed to 39,610, and in 1996 it is down again to about 38,500.
Police D~partment staffing levels need to take into account these typical
population fluctuations. The following table contrasts 1990 and 1996 levels of
service for officers with the Department's preferred staffing level.
1Source: Level of Service Standards: Measures for Maintaining the Quality of Community Life, Municipal Research
Services Center of Washington, Report No. 31, September 1994.
DRAFT Capital Facililjes Program 21 1998-09-08
Law Enforcement
" Tab:ie LE:Z"
Lave{ of Service --Law Enforcement C)fficers
Year j Population Off'mars i Officers per 1,0{30
! ~ Population
1990 38.142 58 1.52
1996 38.500 62 1.61
Preferred · 38, 142 70 1.84
· Preferred LOS for Law Enforcement Officers is based on actual 1990 population.
Source: Bremerton Police Department.
The Police Department considers the existing building space to be inadequate for
the current staff level of 62 officers. The existing law enforcement facilities are
spread out in four different locations, and building space is not efficiently designed
for law enforcement purposes. This is particularly true at the Capital Hill facility,
which houses nine officers in 5,400 sq.ft. (600 sq.~./officer). A more accurate
measure of the existing space per officer can be determined by omitting the
Capital Hill facility and staff from the calculation. Including the Capital Hill facility
and staff, the Current Level of Service is 290 square feet per offic_er. Without that
facility and staff, the Adjusted Current LOS is 238 sq.~. per officer (12,635 sq.~. /
53 officers).
The proposed LOS is lower than the Current LOS, but higher than the Adjusted
Current LOS, assuming that the existing facilities will be replaced with a more
efficiently designed facility. The Proposed LOS assumes that new facilities will be
located in a remodeled existing building rather than in a new facility that could be
designed to meet taw enforcement needs most efficiently.
· Current LOS = 290 square feet per officer
· Adjusted Current LOS = 238 square feet per officer
· Proposed LOS = 250 square feet per officer
c. Future Demand
The projected population growth within the City is for 19,642 new people by year
2012. At the current level of service for law enforcement officers. the City would
need 94 officers by year 2012 -- 32 additional officers. At the Police Departmenrs
preferred staff level of service, the City would need 107 officers by year 2012 -- 45
additional officers. (Table LE-3)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 22 1998-09-08
Law Enforcement
i 1996 2001 · 2012: Total New Population IOff[cers
· J 1996-2012
Population 38,500 41,893 58.142 19.642
Officers ~ 1996 Officer LOS 62 67 94 32
Officers @ Preferred Officer LOS 71 76 107 36
Source: Bremerton Department of Community Development.
d, Need for Capital Facility Improvements
To maintain existing staff levels to year 2012 at 250 sq.ft. per officer, the Police
Department would need 23,500 square feet - an increase of 5,465 sq.ft. over 16
years. To maintain the Departmenrs preferred officer level of service to 2012, it
would need 26,750 square feet - an increase of 8,715 sq.ft. Table LE-4)
r..: · '.' Table LE;,4 ' ~. · "' "':
Future Need: Law:Enf~irCer/~ent"B~ilding'Area (SqUareFeet)' ':.. : ~
J ..... "" · .....:1
.... " [.2:a 2.I:
Scenario" ':.. .' 1996:: · J. '1996"':. '."" '.2001' j Need [ · Increase '
I ActUal ~... 'Need .- Need: .~ , ,,* ·
1996 Officer LOS 18,035 15,500 16,750 23,500 5,465
. R'eferred Officer 18,035 17,500 19,000 26,750 8,715
LOS
· Staff levels per Table LE-3 @ 250 sq.ft./officer.
· * 1996-2012 Increase = 2012 Need - 1996.
The following table shows the future need for Police Department building area by
year 2001 and by year 2012 at the proposed LOS of 250 sq.ft. per officer.
· The year 2001 need is based on continuation of the 1996 Officer LOS (1.61
officers per 1,000 population).
· The year 2012 need is based on a gradual increase in staff levels after year
2001, with the goal of achieving the Preferred Officer LOS (1.84 officers/1000)
by year 2012. (Table LE-5)
DRAFT Capital Facili'des Program 23 1998-09-08
Law Enforcement
Table. LE:S ·
Future Need: Law Enforcement Building'Area
'! :~!i;::Tmqe Period Demand. Officers * Square Feet
,.:..:: so. ft. per Officer
,Six~-Year Need "
1996 38,500 52 15.500
1997-2001 (increase) 3,393 5 1.500
Total as of 2001 = 41,893 67 17.000
S~een Year Need
2002-2012 (increase) 16.249 40 9,750
Total as of 2012 = 58,142 107 26,750
Total 1996-2012 (increase) = 19,642 45 11,250
2001 Need = 1996 Officer LOS; 2012 need = Preferred Officer LOS
So.roe: Sre .e ton E epartment of
e. Plans of Other Providers
The May 3, 1996 draft Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan addresses sheriff
facilities, as well as corrections, work release, and juvenile facilities to serve
county-wide needs. The draft CFP lists a current (1994) LOS for sheriff offices of
122 square feet per 1,000 population. The proposed LOS of 151 square feet per
1,000 population is 29 square feet per 1,000 population (24 percent) higher than
the County's current LOS. The proposed LOS requires an additional 7,780 square
feet of space through the year 2000. The draft six year financing plan lists two
related projects to meet this need: expansion of the Shedff Administrative Office,
and construction of a Silverdale Precinct Building.
f. Proposed Facilities
The City 'has been working to develop a City Facilities Management Plan. A
Facilities Management Alternative Plans study was prepared in February, 1994 to
help plan for near- to mid-term facilities needs for various City departments. The
goal and objective of this plan are the following:
1. Consolidation of Departments to improve communication; coordination;
and streamline department management goals and objectives; and
2. Economics resulting in less property to maintain; centralize departmental
needs; and reduce department managers lost-time due to existing
decentralized departments.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 24 1998-09-08
Law Enforcement
Work on the facilities plan is currently on hold, pending ~nalization of downtown
waterfront redevelopment plans. One proposal under consideration would move
City offices to a new location to free up the present location for redevelopmerit.
The City is concerned about the rising costs of providing jail services. However,
there is no expectation that it would be cost-effective for the City to construct and
staff a new jail facility in compliance with State regulations. Therefore, the City
proposes to continue to contract with Kitsap County to provide jail services for the
foreseeable future.
3. Six-Year Financial Plan
The total need for year 2001 is estimated at 17,000 sq.ft. in one consolidated facility
designed for law enforcement needs. The existing 18,000 feet, while not efficiently used,
will accommodate this need, at least until other options can be examined. A proposal to
construct a new City Hall is discussed under Section D. Municipal Buildings.
The six-year finance plan for municipal buildings is listed in Section K under Other Funds:
Facilities Projects.
CFP Law 1996
DRAFT Capital Facili'des Program 25 1998-09-08
Figure CF-4 Bremert'on Police Department Facilities
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 26 1998-09-08
D. Municipal
1. Inventon/of Existinq Facilities -- Municipal
The inventory of existing municipal facilities includes general purpose buildings and
parking structures. (Table MR-l)
a. Municipal Buildinqs
The inventory of existing municipal buildings includes general city administrative
and court offices. Buildings which house specific governmental functions that are
connected with other capital facility planning areas (e.g. Fire and Emergency
Medical Services and Law Enforcement) are included in those sections of the
Capital Facilities Element. This inventory does not include Public Works &
Utilities Administration or Parks & Recreation Department buildings, which are not
addressed elsewhere in the CFP.
b. Parkinq Structures
The inventory of parking structures includes the underground City Hall parking
beneath City Hall Park and the r-;+.. Municipal Parking Garage. The underground
parking structure houses city vehicles. The Municipal Parking Garage provides for
a combination of public and pdvate sector needs. Some of the spaces are used
for city staff and department parking, but most spaces are leased to long-term
pdvate sector users or are available to the public for hou~y parking,
..
Table MB~I'
Inventory o:f Existing Facilities - Municipal ....
Facility Name { Location .. Size · 'l
General Government (Sq. Ft.)
1. City Hall (1) 239 4th Street 31,915
2. Permit Center 286 4th Street 10,000
Total General Government = 41,915
Parking Structures (Parking Stalls)
1. Underground Parking (City Hall) 225 4th Street *'
2. Municipal Parking Garage 451 Washington Ave. 295
Total Parking Stalls = *'
Notes: (1) City Hall sq.ft. = 39,000 s.fi minus 7,085 s.f. used for Law Enforcement.
· * To be determined.
Source: Public Works & UtilFdes Department, 7/97.
DRAFT Capital Facili'des Program 27 1998-09-08
Munidpal
2. Forecast of Future Needs - Municipal
a. Municipal Buildinqs
(1) Existinq Demand
The need for municipal buildings can be roughly estimated by comparing
the building area (square feet) to the population served. The City has
41,915 square feet of general purpose municipal buildings serving
approximately 38,500 persons. (Table MB-2)
(2) Level of Service (LOS)
The current LOS for municipal buildings is based on the existing building
inventory (sq.~.) divided by the City's 1996 population (38,500). To
continue the existing LOS, the City would need 3,457 additional square
feet by year 2001. (Table MB-2)
The proposed LOS is 64 sq. ~. per 1,000 population (8%) lower than the
City's current LOS. The proposed LOS is based on an assumption that
the City would be able to serve a larger population using a lower LOS if
space could be used more efficiently. 1 (Table MB-3)
· Existing LOS: 1,089 sq. ft. per 1,000 population (1.088701 per capita)
· Proposed LOS: 1,025 sq.~. per 1,000 population (1.025 per capita)
1 ~ Level of Service for Administrative Facilities: "As communffies grow, they generally must add staff and acquire
equipment to handle the addi'donal workload. As a result, they will probably need additional space to house new staff
and equipment. Many cK-/administration offices are crowded compared to their private sector counterparts. For
instance, Urban Land Institute 1988 date shows a national-wide average of 347 square feet per employee. A 1988
Building Owner and managers survey on office space reports that employees in a produ~on office enjoyed an average
of 305 sq. ft while those in a headquarters office on the average occupied 374 sq. ft Note that these averages include
accessory space such as restrooms, hallways and conference rooms (Macheski, 1991). A mini survey of comparable-
s~.ed ci'des conducted by Bainbddge Island found space per employee ratios ranging from 75 to 210 sq. ft. per
employee. A committee conducting an analysis of Bainbddge Island's administrative office concluding that office space
equalling 1149 sq. ft. per 1000 population and 365 sq ft per employee should be provided. These recommendations
covered space for city hall, police and public works functions. Because c~ halls often serve as community centers in
addition to housing office functions, the need for public meeting facili~es may increase the amount of space needed per
employee. (Level of Service Standards: Measures for Maintaining the Quality of Life. Municipal Research Services
Center of Washington, September 1994, Report No. 31, pg. 89)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 28 1998-09-08
Municipal
· .
' · ::E<F :':':~: :::~::~":~:
1996 Actual 38.500 41.91 5 41.915 0
1996-2001: 3,393 3,457 0 -3,457
Gro~h
Total as of 2001 I 41,893 45,372 41,915 -3,457
(3) Future Demand
The projected population growth within the service area is for 3,393 new
residents by 2001. (Table M8-3)
(4) Need for Capital Facility Improvements
The proposed LOS would require an additional 4,503 square feet of space
by the year 2001. (Table MB-3)
Table MB-3 :"
LOS Capacity AnalysiS:' Municipa!:Admihistrafive OfficeS' : . :'.
(~) ('2) .... '(3):'.' (4) : (5) ..:
Time pedod City population. Sq.~. reqOir~d'@ Sq=ff,. available Net reserve or'
~ :025 per capita i deficiency.'
1997 Actual 38,500 39,463 41,915 2,453
1997-2002: 3,393 3,478 (1,025) -4,503
Growth
Total as of 2001 41,893 42,940 42,940 0
Capacity projects: New City Hall
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 29 1998-09-08
Munidpal
b, Parking Structures
(-1) __,xisting ~mand (7'0 bo oornplotod)
(:;l) L~vel ef $erviee (~ Q$) (7'o bo oornplotod)
(3) Future ~emend (7'o bo eornplotod)
The City accepted a role in providing public parking in the downtown when it built
the existing oarking earage. This decision was a Policy decision ddven by an
understanding that the availability of Darkina Dtavs a key role in the economic
health _of the downtoyvn. The City has determined that it must share the
responsibility for providing parking with the private sector when the private sector
is unable to do so alone. It would be difficult to identify a level of service
measurement that could predict the CitYs responsibility. As the health of the
downtown improves, the market should be able to supply a greater proportion of
the parking needs.
3. Proposed Municipal Facilities
a. Municipal Buiidinqs
(1) Plans of Other Providers
No other agencies provide space that can be used for gen.eral municipal
purposes.
(2) Proposed Facilities
The City conducted a preliminary facilities study in 1985 to consider the
City's short-term and long-term facility needs. This study found that the
City's existing facilities were generally inadequate to meet the City's
current operating requirements, and that population growth would furher
increase facilities needs. The most cdtical needs identified at that time
included: a substandard jail and crowded Municipal Court; dispersal of City
administrative activities to vadous facilities; the quality of City Hall; and
inadequate facilities for operational sections of Public Works. Several
changes have been made since 1985, including closure of the jail, addition
of the Permit Center, and construction of the new Oyster Bay Public Works
& Utilities Operations Center.
A follow-up Facilities Management Alternative Plans study was prepared in
1994 to help plan for near- to mid-term facilities needs for various City
departments. Work on this study has been on hold, pending finalization of
downtown waterfront redevelopment plans.
Although the City does not expect to need additional capacity by 2001, the
City recognizes that it needs to continue facilities planning to further
consolidate activities and replace aging structures. There is considerable
expense in operating and maintaining the current obsolete facilities.
Communications, efficiency, and coordination are significantly more
expensive in the existing facilities. New construction and design
DRAFT Capital FacilFdes Program 30 1998-09-08
Municipal
techniques would decrease operations and maintenance costs and
improve the efficient provision of city services. Therefore, the City
proposes to continue its on-going facilities study to focus on consolidation
of City administrative functions, with the possible inclusion of courts and
law enforcement functions, at one centralized site. If this can be done, the
City expects that the effective level of service can be increased within the
proposed LOS. Toward this end, the City is programming funds for
replacement of City Hall, the Permit Center, and some or all of the facilities
used by the Police Department (see Law Enforcement section) with ~
one consolidated facility in 2002.
b. Parking Structures
(1) Plans of Other Providers
No other agencies provide public parking facilities for the downtown area.
12) Proposed Facilities
The Sinclair Landing Association has determined a need for a large
parking structure in conjunction with the proposed Sinclair Landing
development in downtown Bremerton. The Sinclair Landing project
includes 23 buildings/facilities in a multi-block area. The project would
create 2,930 new oarkina spaces and eliminate approximately 1,500
spaces. Most of the parking spaces to be eliminated are located in surface
parking lots. Most of the new parking spaces would be located in two
parkina buildings and one residential building. The largest parking building.
would provide 1,592 spaces.
The City has determined that completion of the Sinclair Landing Project is
cdtical to the future of the City. For the project to be successful, adequate
public parking will be necessary. Therefore, the City proposes to purchase
from the developer the large multi-story Sinclair Landing Parking Structure,
which will serve the owners, employees and customers of the Sinclair
Landing Project, including the multi-modal transportation center.
4. Six-Year Financial Plan
The six-year financial plan for municipal buildings is included in Section K of this CFP.
CFP Municipal 1998
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 31 1998-09-08
Municicat Buildings
Figure CF-5 Bremeffon Municipal Buildings and Parking Structures
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 32 1998-09-08
E. Parks and Recreation
The City of Bremerton provides a system of local parks (neighborhood and community
parks), regional parks, and open space parks. This system is managed by the City's
Parks and Recreation Department with the help of the Bremerton Parks and Recreation
Commission. The park system service area consists of all land within the incorporated
city limits.
This parks and recreation capital facilities program reflects recommendations of the
City of Bremerton Parks & Recreation Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1995, as
updated by the City Parks & Recreation Department.
1. Inventon/of Park Lands
The following inventory lists local, regional, open space, and special use park
lands.
a. Local Parks
To assist in analyzing service levels, local parks are divided into two
categories: neighborhood and community parks. Bremerton has 247:~ 215
acres of local park lands 3n inoroaco of 1.0,5 scroc cinoo ! 096.
(1) Neiqhborhood Parks
A neighborhood park is a combination playground and park
designed primarily for non-supervised, non-organized recreation
activities. In addition to their recreation value, neighborhood parks
also provide a source of open space and aesthetic quality in the
neighborhood. They are generally small in size (about 3-10 acres)
and serve an area of approximately one half mile radius. The
City's neighborhood parks range in size from less than one acre to
more than 27 acres.
The City has 88 4~__4 acres classified as neighborhood parks -- an
increase of thrcc four. parks e~ ,~1.05 5.55 acres.~ since 1995. The
following table includes an inventory of the City's ~ 1~___1
neighborhood parks. (Table P__R-1)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 33 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreation
Table PR-1
Inventory of Neighborhood Parks :
Map # Park Name Address I Total Capacity
(Acres)
34 Arvon Park Arvon Street 0.03~
1 Forest Ridge Park Summit Avenue & 1 st Street 27.30!
3 Kjwanis Playfield Between 4th & 5th at Veneta 3.00,
32 McKenzie Basketball Court Juniper Court 0.02i
5 Ninth Street Mini-Park E. 9th &Shore Drive 0.02!
6 Roto Vista Park 17th &Warren 0.70~
33 Lower Roto Vista Park Elizabeth Street end 1.00i
7 S,P. "Pat" Carey Vista Tracyton Beach Road 0.50!
9 Smith Playfield 1199 Elizabeth Street 3.00!
10 SR-3 Park Arsenal & Kitsap Way 3.80i
i- G unnamed park (Haddon School Site) 15th &Lafayette 4.50I
! Total Neighborhood Park Acres = 43.87
(2) Communitv Parks
A community park is planned primarily to provide active and
structured recreation opportunities for young people and adults. In
general, community park facilities are designed for organized
activities and sports, although individual and family activities are
also encouraged. Community parks can also provide indoor
facilities to meet a wider range of recreation interests. Where
there are no neighborhood parks, the community park can also
serve this function. Community parks serve a much larger area
and offer more facilities. They usually exceed 20 acres in size and
often have sport fields, water bodies, gardens, nature trails or
similar facilities as the central focus of the park. Their service area
is at least a 1-2 mile radius. The City's community parks range in
size from one third acre to 54 acres.
The City has ~67 171 acres of community park lands. The
following table includes an inventory of these community parks.
The list includes ! '!,9 153 acres of "community parks of regional
significance'". These are parks that have traditionally served as
local parks, but because of special features such as waterfront
access have taken on a regional role as well. For example, while
Bachmann Park is a very small waterfront park in the Manette
neighborhood, it has become a popular regional sailboard
launching site. These parks are listed as a subcateg0ry of
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 34 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreation
community parks because they have been identified in the Kitsap
Countywide Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan as parks
with regional significance which are eligible for countywide funding
participation. (Table PR-2)
Table PR-2
Inventory of Community Parks
" ~ To~l| capacity
Map ~ ~ Park Name .. ~ :. Address ~ (Acres)
12 Bataan Park Sylvan & Olympus Dr 1.00
13 Blueberry Park Sylvan Way 6.90
14 C~ Hall Park 4th & Washington 0.30
18 Jarstad Park Old Belfair Highway 4.00
20 Manette Park &Senior C~zens Center 1140 Nipsic 2.60
24 Warren Avenue Playfield 1 lth &Warren Avenue 3.00
25 Wycoff Memodal Park I st &Pacific Ave. (CBD) 0.02
..... Subtotal = 17.82
Community Parks of Regional Significance. . E '.:.: .
11 Bachmann Park Shore Drive &Trenton 0.50
15 Eastpark & G. Jamtad Aquatic Center Magnusson Way &Homer 17.50
Jones
16 Evergreen Park 14th &Park Avenue 10,50
19 Kitsap Lake Park Price Road 31.90
4 Lent Lane Park Lebo Boulevard 1.50
22 N.A.D. Marine Park Shorewood Drive end 27.50
21 N.A.D. Park (upper) 6002 Kitsap Way 54.00
8 Sheddan Park (lower) Lebo Boulevard &Clare Street 6.00
23 Sheddan Park Community Recreation 680 Lebo Boulevard 4.00
Center
Total Community Parks of Regional Significance = 153,4
Total Community Park Acres = 171.22
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 35 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreation
b. Reqionai Parks
Regional parks are recreation areas that serve an entire region. They are
usually large in size and often include areas of natural quality suitable for
outdoor recreation activities such as golfing, picnicking, boating, fishing,
swimming, camping and hiking. If located within an urban area, they
sometimes offer a wider range of facilities and activities which serves the
entire region. The City's regional parks range from two to 50 acres.
The City has 67 acres of regional parks. However, if the 4-4.8 153 acres of
"community parks of regional significance" are included (see Table PR-2),
there are 21 =~ 220 acres of City parks serving the local region. The
following table includes an inventory of the City's three regional parks.
(Table PR-3)
Inventory of Regional Parks
Map # .. .. 'Park Name ~.. : "Address. ' .... ' CapaCity'. ·
: (Acres) '
I
28 i Bremerton Boardwalk = Between Ist & 4th St. - 2.00
i downtown waterfront
27 Lions Community Playfield Lebo at Hefner 15.00.
29 Andy Pendergast Regional Park 1199 Union 50.00
Total Regional Park Acres = 67.00
c. Open Space
An open space park consists of undeveloped land primarily left in its
natural environment, with recreation uses as a secondary objective. It is
usually owned or managed by a governmental agency and may or may
not have public access. This type of land often includes steep hillsides,
wetlands, large lorested areas or other similar spaces. In some cases,
environmentally sensitive areas are considered as open space and
include wildlife habitats, stream and creek corridors, forested areas or
unique or endangered plant species. The City's open space lands are
often heavily wooded, and development, if any, is usually limited to trails.
Bremerton has 55 acres of open space, including a cemetery. In addition,
the City maintains numerous beautification areas and pocket parks. The
following table includes an inventory of Bremerton open space park lands.
(Table ~R-4)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 36 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreation
Table PR4 : :. "".
Inventory of OpenSpace Pa~cs
7 Eastpark Nature Area Wheaton Way at Magnusson 14.40
13 Ivy Green Cemetery Naval Avenue 13.00
31 Stephenson Canyon Between Lewis Lane &Willow 28.00
Beauti~catjon Areas~ocket vadous locations
Parks 3.00
Total Open Space Acres = 58,4
d. Special Use Facilities
The City-owned Gold Mountain Golf Cc=rco Complex is located several
miles south of the developed parts of the City. It is listed separately from
other park and recreation facilities because it is an "enterprise" facility
that is intended to pay for itself. Generally, the developmeet and
operation of the golf course is financed with user fees and other special
enterprise revenues, including development and operating ~agreements
with concessionaires. The size of the facility will no,3rly doubled, from 190
to 360 acres, with completion of the addition of a second 18 holo golf
cs~rsc holes in 1996.
Table PR-5
Inventory of Special Use Facilities
Map # .L.F._a_c..ii'_~t_._N_a_me ................Address ._. [ Capacity {ACres)
26 Gold Mountain Golf Ge~Fr, e Old Belfair Highway 360.00
Complex
Total = 360.00
e. Total Park Lands
The City has a total of 684- 701. acres of park lands, including the
municipal golf course. Without the golf course, the total is ~ 340 acres.
(Table PR-6)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 37 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreation
: ' Table PR-6
Summary Inventory -All Park Lands
';' Type I Capacity {Acres)
: Neighborhood Parks i J~3.,.,~.
i Community Parks
Regional Parks i 67.00
Open Space Parks 58.40
:: :: :: ::::i:::: . :::: ::.::: :. ,:.. · .......
Special Use Facilities 360.00
Total = 7'00.49
2. Forecast of Future Park Needs
a. Existinq Demand
With Cg.~F 700 acres of park lands serving 38,500 residents, the City has
18.0 acres of park lands per 1,000 persons (including the municipal golf
course). Without the golf course, the City has only ~..~ 8.9 acres of parks
per 1,000 persons. (Table PR-7)
b. Level of Service (LOS)
The need for park lands can be estimated by comparing the number of
existing park acres per 1,000 persons with national standards. The
National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) recommends a total
LOS of 15-20 acres per 1,000 persons for local and regional park lands.
The following table compares the Existing LOS (ELOS) and the LOS
recommended by NRPA. The overall City LOS is within the
recommended range if the municipal golf course is included. Without the
golf course, the City LOS is far below the NRPA recommendation.
Compared to the NRPA guidelines, the City has ample regional park
lands but falls short in neighborhood, community. and open space park
lands. (Table PR-7)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 38 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreation
!i!i! i~:~:~i Level of Service (LOS): All Park Lands
! :::::: Type. Acres LOS Acres 11,000 Population)
NRPA Exg-'ting (2)' [ Proposed (3)
Neighborhood (1) 43.87 1.25 .L1. 1.25
Community 17122 5 4.4 3.98
ReGicnal 67.00 5 -
Ooen Soace 58.40 3.6 1.5 1.39:
Subtotal = 340,4cj 15 - 24 89 7.91 '
Special Use Facilil~es 360.00 - 9.4 8.59 ,
Total Park Lands = 700.49 15 18.2 16.82
(1) The NRPA Neighborhood Parks LOS includes 0.25 to 0.5 acres mini-park.
(2) Existing LOS = Acres / 1996 Population x 1,000 (1996 pop. = 38.5).
(3) Proposed LOS = existing + new acres/2001 pop./1000 (41.893).
The NRPA standards are intended for a "typical" community/, and of
course all communities differ. For example, while the NRPA
recommended LOS indicates that Bremerton is deficient in open space
parks, the City is surrounded by thousands of acres of open water.
Although water bodies may not fall within the traditional meaning of "open
space", nevertheless many Bremerton waterfront parks provide visual and
physical access to miles of open water that would be difficult to quantify
with a LOS. Likewise, distant mountain views visible from many parts of
the city add to the perception of open space.
The NRPA standards were shaped in the early part of this century.
Although they have been adjusted over the years, they may not represent
today's needs and values. Accordingly, they are currently under review
for possible revision. They are best viewed as rough guidelines -- useful,
but not absolute.
The proposed LOS of 14.15 acres per 1,000 persons will be a decrease
from the existing LOS. This is because even though park acreage will be
increased by 12.95 acres by year 2001, this acreage will serve over 3,000
more City residents. A per capita version of the LOS is also listed for the
purpose of calculating park needs to serve forecasted population growth.
(Table PR-7)
· Existing LOS = i 8.0 acres per 1,000 persons
?
(0.0179607 acres per capita.)
DRAFT Capital Facili+jes Program 39 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreation
· Proposed LOS = 16.82 acres per 1,000 persons
(0.0168164 acres per capita.)
c. Future Demand
The projected population growth within the City is for 19,642 new people
by year 2012, for a total population of 58, 142.
d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements
The proposed LOS would result in a need for 286 additional acres of park
lands by year 2012 - a total of 978 acres. This goal may not be
sustainable if the City's population grows as projected. (Table PR-8)
fab te. P R~' ':
" .' FUtm, e Nee~h. Parks .' '.' ': "
: Time Period I Population. i':' · '. ACreS ~ ".. · ~ Current acres ". ~ Net t;eservei or'
" ~" " ' I ' "
} :. = · '0.0'168164' pei'' ,~vailable i~ deficiency.:'.
: : '. :' '.' 'capita.' ~ ~ -. · · ..:.
Six-Year Need
1996 actual 38,500 i 647.43 691.49 44.06
1997-2001 (new) 3,393 57.06 44.06 -13.00
Total as of 2001 = 41,893 704.49 0.00 -13.00
:Si~een~Year Need
2002-2012 (new) 16,249 273.25 0.00 -273.25
Total as of 2012 = 58,142 977.74 0.00 -977.74
1997-2012 (new) 19,642 330.31 44.06 -286,25
3. Proposed Park Facilities
a. Plans of Other Providers
The 1994 Kitsap Countywide Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan
recommends that the various jurisdictions undertake a coordinated,
countywide approach to facility development to meet present and
projected park and recreation land and facility needs. The plan proposes
a county-wide LOS of 12.75 acres per 1,000 persons. Both the existing
and proposed City LOS are above the proposed County standard.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 40 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreation
The county-wide plan recommends that Kitsap County park and
recreation agencies undertake a "strategic role" service approach where:
a) the county provides park and recreation facilities and programs that no
other agency can or is willing to provide; b) the county acts as a
coordinator of local interests where facilities are provided by many other
agencies; and c) the county performs as a facilitator where unique
acquisition or development opportunities may occur that could be
implemented or operated by the local city or other agencies. Under this
strategy, the county will consider providing financial support for capital
facilities that have regional use benefits. Examples in Bremerton are:
Bremerton Boardwalk; Lions Field; Pendergast Regional Park; and
Eastpark/Bremerton YMCA.
The May 1996 draft Kitsap County Plan proposes a total LOS of 13.13
acres per 1,000 population for County-owned parks. This will require
purchase of an additional 1,730 acres by year 2012. The County expects
the LOS to decrease in future years, as park land acquisitions are
completed. Expenditures will then be concentrated on development
following acquisitions.
b. Proposed City Facilities
In addition to adding new park lands, the City recognizes that it needs to
make more intensive use of some existing park lands. For example, the
City proposes to develop a natural amphitheater on the hillside above the
ninth green on the Olympic course at Gold Mountain Golf Courso
Complex.
The City recognizes the difficulty in maintaining the recommended LOS
past the year 2000. There are few large tracts of undeveloped land left
within the developed parts of the City today. As infill development
continues there will be even less vacant land, and land prices are likely to
increase correspondingly. These developments may make it impossible
to meet typical acreage standards. To continue to pursue a goal of
providing opportunities for recreation and enjoyment of open space in
every neighborhood will be a particular challenge. One option is a
proposal to purchase approximately 275 acres of State DNR land with
timber in the area North of Riddell Road and East of SR 303. This project
is contigent on annexation of the surrounding area and the use of
associated tax revenue.
The City will need to seek creative ways of adding park lands within
developed pads of the city where vacant land is scarce. For example, the
City and School District are exploring the possibility of shared use of
school recreation lands. Other solutions could include tree-lined
"greenways" connecting park lands; and roo~op gardens, landscaped
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 41 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreation
public courtyards, or fees in lieu of open space in high density areas. In
the long run the City may need to develop LOS standards which will
better measure alternative park and recreation opportunities.
4. Six-year Financinq Plan
The six-year financing plan for parks and recreation facilities is included in
Section K of this Capital Facilities Program.
CFP Parks 1998
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 42 1998-09-08
Parks and Recreatien
Figure CF-6 Bremerton Park Facilities
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 43 1998-09-08
F. Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary sewer facilities are provided by the Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities.
A complete inventory, analysis of need, and capital improvements program are provided in the
adopted Wastewater Comprehensive Plan (a. k.a. the "Wastewater Plan").
1. Service Area
The Wastewater Comprehensive Plan identifies a service area consisting of territory
currently served by the Wastewater Utility, as well as areas adjacent to the city limits that
are not now serviced but which could logically be served based on natural topography.
The service area covers 13 drainage basins, of which five extend beyond the city limits
into unincorporated county areas: Kitsap Lake, Tracyton Beach, Trenton Avenue, Sinclair
Park, and Oyster Bay. The Utility provides sewage treatment to the sewered areas in the
service area through direct service and through specific contractual agreements with the
U.S. Navy and Kitsap County Sewer District No. 1 (Navy Yard City). (Figure CF-4
Bremen'on Wastewater System Service Area)
The Port of Bremerton operates a public wastewater facility located in Olympic View
Industrial Park (OVIP) on State Route 3 west of Gorst. The Port is exploring alternatives
to provide this area with high level municipal sewer. Tho City has 3ntorod into an
3groomont v~th K!tc3p County to partic~p-'~to in a Corr.,t Aro3 Sow<~r ~'o-~cibility StudT,
whic, h will o~nmino altomativoc for c~,vodng tho groator Gorct 3r3a, including tho OVIP
and 3irport. The Port District has contacted Sewer District ~5, Kitsap Coun~ Public
Works, and the City of Bremerton for improved sewer service and has no formally
contracted sewer service. Preliminary Port discussions indicate they will seek service
from Port Orchard/Sewer District #5.
2., Inventory of Existinq Facilities
The City sewerage system consists of sewage collection, transmission, treatment, and
bio-solids utilization facilities. Included are more than 188 miles of gravity sewers,
approximately 16 miles of pressure lines, and 33 pump stations. These facilities convey
sewage to a secondary wastewater treatment plant located just south of West Hills.
Additionally there are 16 combined sewer overflow (CSO) sites located within the sewer
collection system. Approximately 60 percent of the system is composed of combined
sanitary and ~tormwater sewers. (Table SS-1)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 44 1998-09-08
Sanitary Sewer
::: :~::ii~ii:z::~:~:~i::!!:~:~:::! :~:!:. ~iiT:i~:;:~ i'~ :!:. :: :::~ ::~:: ! InverttoW: Wa stewater Treatment F~l/'de~ .
Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Plant (1) 1600 Oyster Bay Ave W (3) 10.1 mgd
Collection System: Pipe vadous 204 miles
Wastewater lift stations vadous 34
Forest Enhancement S/tes One & Two (2) Near Gold Mtn. Golf Course 600 acres
(1) City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, December 1995.
(2) C/b/of Bremerton 1993 Biosolids Report to Bremerton-Kitsap County Heaith District.
(3) Average flow for maximum month per NPDES permit.
(a) Wastewater Treatment Plant
The existing wastewater treatment plant was designed to have a peak
hydraulic capacity of 29.5 million gallons per day (mgd). Peak flows in
excess of 25 mgd are typical during wet months. Normal dry weather peak
flow capacity without stormwater inflow is estimated at 8 r;ngd. Current
annuai average and max/mum monthly flows to the wastewater treatment
plant are about 80 percent of the average annual and maximum monthly
flows for which it was designed. it is estimated that 21 percent of the
annual average flow and 44 percent of the maximum month flow is
stormwater inflow. Stormwater will be reduced from the system over the
next several years under the City's CSO Reduction Plan, which was
implemented in 1994. By the end of calendar year 1998, CSO reduction is
calculated to be 39% complete-!
Once stormwater inflow is reduced, the treatment plant will have the
capacity to serve approximately 58,000 people.
(b) Forest Enhancement Proclram - Biosolids Utilization
The wastewater treatment plant produces approximately five million
gallons of anaerobically digested biosolids each year. Because biosolids
- have fertilizer and soil amendment value the City began an active land
application program several years ago to utilize the benefits of this
wastewater process by-product. Biosolids are used to enhance tree
growth and are currently applied to 600 acres of Utility-owned forest land.
Since June 1992, 100 percent of the biosolids produced at the treatment
plant have been utilized in this beneficial manner. The objective of the
City's forest enhancement program is to develop an environmentally sound
method of using the resource value of biosolids in accordance with
federal, state, and local regulations.
Source: City of Bremertort Wastewater Utility, 8/98.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 45 1998-09-08
Sanitary Sewer
3, Future Needs
a. Existinq Demand
The Wastewater Plan estimates the 1990 population of the service area at
45,210, of which 38,140 were within the city limits and 7,070 outside the
city. The plan estimates that approximately 37,000 persons within the
service area were connected to the sewer system, leaving an unsewered
population of 8,210.2
Kitsap County estimates that the total 1994 service area population was
46,928.3 The City estimates that the 1996 population is approximately
52,762.4
The average annual daily flow, including storm water inflow. is
approximately 6.0 mgd. As CSO separation occurs, the average flow will
be reduced accordingly? Minimum peak flow (peak flows occurring
without storm water inflow) is estimated at 8 mgd. While the U.S. Navy is
allocated 3.8 mgd, it is currently discharging only 1 mgd -- roughly
equivalent to 10,000 population. ('Table SS-2)
b. Level of Service (LOS)
The capacity of existing sewer facilities to serve future needs is
determined by comparing the gallons of effluent per day now approved by
the State, the number of existing connections, and the number of new
people to be served. The number of new people is converted into the
number of new residential connections based on assumptions of the
number of persons per household, and the number of gallons of effluent
generated per capita per day (gpcd). The capacity can also be estimated
based on an existing and planned LOS for sewer service.
The calculation of the current LOS excludes stormwater inflow. (Although
the City's system experiences some infiltration, it is not a major component
of the flow.) The proposed LOS is the existing county-wide average.
2 Source: Table 1., C~ of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, December 1995, p. A-2 (Estimate
prepared in 1992).
3Source: Table SS-2. Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan Sewer Facilities - 20-Year Population Allocation
- CSF #1, Draft Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Part II, April 1996, PG. 3-87. The County population
estimate is for the total service area, and does not include an estimate of the sewered or unsewered
populations,
4 The City population estimate is based on the Kitsap County population estimate for the unincorporated
part of the sewer service area, along with the City estimate within the city limits. (See page CFP-9)
5 Source: Bremerton Wastewater Utility, 9/96.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 46 1998-09-08
Sanitary Sewer
· Current LOS = 97 gallons per capita per day (gpcd)s
· Proposed LOS = 100 gpcd
c. Future Demand
The May 1996 draft Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan estimates that a total of
66,096 persons within the sewer service area will require sanitary sewer service
by year 2012, an increase of 19,168 persons from 1992. The County plan
estimates that this increase includes 1,111 persons that were not connected to
the sewer system in 1992. (Table SS-2)
: Table SS-2.
Kitsap COunty CaPital Facilities Plan .Sewer Facilities -. 20-Year AJiocaU0n
i . '
Population 1992. I 1994.' 2000 i '20~2 ~1992-2012 !" 2012
! ~ . % change . increa~se ~
Total Population 46,321 46,928 54,3?0 66,096 29.92% 19,168
- Sewered 45,210 NE NE 66,096
- Unsewered 1,111 NE NE 0
Source: Table SS-2, Draft Kitsap County Capital Facilides Plan, May 1996, pg. 3-87.
The County allocation addresses years 1994 and 2000 (rather than years 1996-
2001) in order to comply with a Puget Sound Growth Headngs Board order.
Therefore, the City has projected service area population figures for years 1996
and 2001 based on the County forecast. (Table SS-3)
s"Executive Summan/", City of Bremerton Sewer Comprehensive Plan, October 1991, p. 10.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 47 1998-09-08
Sanitary, Sewer
Table SS-3
Future Need: Sanitary Sewer ·
Time Period- Demand . Capacity AverageDaily.
(Population in City- (Population)· Demand' ~_~-100: '
County Service Area) GPCE~: (MGD):
Six-Year Need: ·
1996 Service Area Population 52,762 58,000 5,28
1997-2001 New Population 2, 128 3,110 0.21
Total 2001 Sewered 54,890 3,110 5,49
Population =
2001-2012 New Population (4) 11,206 (8,096) 1.12
Total 2012 Sewered Population 72,077 (14,077) 7.21
Total 1996-2012 Increase = 19,315 (4,986) 1.93
Notes: For the purposes of this projection, it is assumed that all persons within the service area will
connect to the sewer system by year 2001.
d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements
The Wastewater Plan was developed for an ultimate service area population of
80,610. Therefore, planned improvements will be adequate to serve the projected
72,077 sewered population, provided there are no major unanticipated industrial
hookups.
The City is participating has participated in a feasibility study to sewer Gorst and
the industrial properties in the vicinity of the Port of Bremerton and Anderson
Creek. Sewedrig all or a portion of these areas utilizing Bremerton's treatment
facility are included as options. The results of this study may affect the need and
timing for treatment plant expansion.
The City has reviewed potential demands on the wastewater system from the light
industrial / business park development of the Port Blakely property located
westerly of Kitsap Lake. In performing this review, the City converted the
anticipated demand of the light industrial / business park to it's functional
population equivalent. The population equivalent was added to anticipated
demand for both the six and twenty year horizon. Adequate reserve capacity was
found to be available (with anticipated system improvements) to accommodate
the project.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 48 1998-09-08
Sanitary Sewer
e. Plans of Other Providers
The Kitsap County Public Works Department Wastewater Division is in the
process of preparing a County-Wide Wastewater Facility Plan. The draft plan
integrates the individual wastewater plans within the county, and includes
recommendations for expanding county facilities to serve projected needs.
f. Proposed Facilities
The City's Wastewater Plan recommends four types of improvements at the
treatment plant to accommodate proiected sewage flows at ultimate plan service
area development and to solve some current and anticipated operational
problems:
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 48A 1998-09-08
Sanitary Sewer
Infrastructure improvements - repairs or replacements of existing sewer
system facilities to restore structural integrity;
· Regulatory requirements - improvements needed as a result of new or
modified codes, guidelines, or laws initiated from federal, state, and local
government;
· Growth and system extensions - improvements resulting from new
development or system extensions;
· Other system improvements -- recommendations that contribute to the
improved operation or function of the system but are not a result of
infrastructure needs, regulations, or system growth.
The Utility will 3cquiro has acquired properties in the vicinity of the wastewater
treatment facility for future plant expansion and buffer for odor management.
The City ,.':!]! ~o is conducting a study for reuse of wastewater treatment plant
effluent. The purpose of the study is to determine the feasibility of rousing effluent
for industrial use or land application. If feasible alternatives for reuse are
identified, the City may pursue these alternatives toward implementation.
The combined sewer overflow reduction program will continue ovor tho noxt c, ix
~,'ccrc until the year 2011. Tho program inc.,tudoc Gomplotion of C3tlo,,v Avonuo
Bacin F',.riodty ! & 2 aludng 1007 and 1008. Reduction of overflows in the
Anderson Cove Basin will begin with completion of an engineering report in !997
1998. This will be followed by final design and construction in ph,scoc from ! 008
though 2001 beginning in 1999. Smaller projects will be undertaken throughout
the system to reduce combined sewer overflows as they are identified. These
projects may include pipe rerouting, combined sewer storage, a,~ overflow
structure modifications, and increasing flow to the wastewater treatment plant
4. Six-Year Financial Plan
It is estimated that the existing sanitary sewer system has a total capacity of 8 million
gallons per day (mgd), with approximately 3 mgd available capacity, which is sufficient to
meet the total need of 5.49 mgd through the next six years, provided there are no major
new industrial demands. (This assumes removal of stormwater from the system over the
next several years under the City's CSO Reduction Plan.)
The six-year financial plan for sanitary sewer facilities is included in Section K of this
CFP. It is a summary of the City's Six Year (1996-2001) Wastewater Capital
Improvement Plan. Improvements are shown to be pdmadly Utility financed through
2002, assuming no grants will be available. Of the Non-Utility financed projects, most of
the growth-related improvements are anticipated to be financed by special utility local
improvement districts (ULIDs) or by developers directly. It is anticipated that roughly 20
percent of the expenditures beyond 2000 will be funded by non-utility sources of revenue.
CFP Sewer 1998.doc
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 49 1998-09-08
LEGEND
WASTeWATER COMPREHfNSIVE
,~ ~_ PLAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY:
i CITY LIMITS
I__
/ j_,r" SEWERED PORTIONS NON-SEWERED
----" __F- ~ PORTIONS OF BASIN~
,,/-./-.......--,.,. .....
-
.
t
~IGUR~ C~-7 ~R~RTO~ SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM S~RVIC~ AR~A ~:\~¥~MAP;~\C~-~8.~WG
G. Schools
Bremerton School Distdct #100C is located on the Kitsap Peninsula between Port Orchard Bay,
D~es Inlet and Sinclair Inlet. The District is adjacent to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, and its
enrollment is directly related to the military population at the base. (See F/gum CF-5)
The Bremerton School Distdct provides public education in most parts of the City. The exception
is a small area in the vicinity of the Bremerton Watershed, which is served by South Kitsap
School District #402. The Jackson Park Naval Reservation is jointly served by the Bremenon
School Distdct and Central Kitsap Public School Distdct #401.
Only the Bremerton School District is included in this Capital Facilities Program, since such a
small fraction of city residents is served by the South Kitsap School District, and no school
facilities operated by that district are located within the city limits.
1. Inventory of Existinq Facilities -- Schools
The Bremerton School Distdct has seven elementary schools, one middle school, one
junior high school and one high school plus an altemative high school. the Distdct also
administers a vocational skills center that serves six other school districts. The current
grade configuration in the District is based on grades K-5, elementary; grades 6-7, middle
school; grades 8-9, junior high; and grades 10-12, high school. The following table lists
the Bremerton School District's schools and their enrollment capacity. (Table SC-1)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 51 1998-09-08
Screens
Table ~-1
Inventorit of Existing Facilities -- Eremorton School District
;
School : Location Existing Student
; Capacity
~ Elementary _Schools (Grades
, .-'.r"n,~n .ahr ...... ~CC..~!.b_.b.. .__ 481
i
~ .,3.'cwnmll · 537 Bertha Ave. 529
J
~ K;tsa:,, _.a_ke_L ...... 111 ! Carr 51vc. 55C
[Nav-~= Ave_."u._e_ ........... G0C CI.vmc_j.c_ .... 484
j '/.'ew ___
L_:.~'].YrrJ:,c_. 2442 .Perry 486
I .........
% :y'~;-w~:Sg_e' .... 3220 Wheatcn ,~av
,.
~. , it... -,l:s .... j 52S Nat.'onai Ave Sc
I ..........................
i Tsta= E e'ne:'lar'! Permanerl:
I
., ........ T~.'.s! E:er.-'_e_n.ta_rv 'r~terim .'PcrtaDle~ Fac:i;rJes = 250
Total Elementary Permanent and Interim Facilities = 3.835
: Midd!elJr. High Schools (Grades 6-9)
: ',lc,:ma,n Vew Midc!e Sc:;coi
J B'er",;.-.cn jE. Ficr 13C0 E 3Cth '.I'5
.~. = .............. . .................... ·
L ...... Total Middle:jr. High Permanent Fac:;i~:es = 1 ,~25
- T; :aL'¢,.d._'q!.e."__Jr. Hi.__eJ' :r'. te r;m; Pc rta tie:, F ac:;aties = I '. 5
....... Total Middle/jr. High Permanent and Interim Facilities = 2.340
Senior High Sc_h.9_o.!.s J_G_.rades 10-12)
'
,._-_-... ,,..:,.. ;,._~.,,. ..................,,.
.................... _T.'-:!:'.i i_S.-._c.]~.,<.-...r .%g ; L'.S_c_;_~.cF. =...~.r_.;2r_,.r.e_,_;t_=_:.Lc.......!!.,j.s =. ..................._'
: ......
..................... _'_.c. tai..S.e'~.'cr.'.:L~:~ '.n;.er:m..
I'
Total Senior High School Permanent and Interim Facilities = 1,390
Source: Bremerton School Distdct No. 100C, 4/97.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 52 1998-09-08
E. Schools
2. Forecast of Future Needs - Bremerton School District
a. Existin~ Demand - Enrollment and Capacity
There were 6.463 students enrolled in Bremerton School District schools in 1996.
Existing enrollment is shown in Table SC-3 (column 2).
b. Level of Service (LOS)
The Bremerton School District has established the standard size for schools as
550 for elementary, 1,000 for middle school/jr. high, and 1,250 for senior high.
The overall student to teacher ratio is set at 24 for elementary students and 32 for
secondary schools. However, the district is concerned that the use of average
classroom size as a standard may be misleading, since classroom size varies by
program and contract provisions. The data for middle/junior high and senior high
schools overstate the actual capacity of those schools because they are not
adjusted for the "utilization" or "efficiency" factor that represents classrooms not in
use during some periods of instruction. These factors typically reduce the
theoretical capacities listed below by 10 to 15 percent. (Table SC-2)
Table SC-2
Level of Service -- Bremerton School District
Measure i EJementary ; Middle/Jr. High i Senior High
School Size (Students) 550 1,000 1,250
Classroom Size 24 32 32
Sources: Bremerton School District, 10/94; Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Part Ih Capital Facilities
Plan, 12/23/96
c. Future Demand - Enrollment Projections
The need for new schools is based on projected school enrollment. The
Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) provides enrollment
projections based on the "Cohort Survival Method".~ The school district considers
the SCI system useful, but inadequate to represent the unique growth conditions
of the Bremerton district. For example, 1992 enrollment forecasts based on SCI
projections predicted a school population of 8,370 in 1994 --2,185 higher than
actual 1994 enrollment. The largest single factor in Bremerton enrollment has
historically been the fluctuation in naval population, which can be difficult to
predict very far in advance.
~ The Cohort Survival Method uses histodc patterns of student progression by grade level to measure the portion of students
moving from one grade level up to the next higher cohort or grade. This ratio or survival rate is used in conjunction with current
birbh rates as a base for state-w~de enrollment projections.,
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 53 1998-09-08
E, Schools
Table SC-3 compares current and future enrollment to the enrollment capacity of
the Bremerton School District.
The enrollment data (column 2) was derived from population forecasts provided
by Kitsap County used to develop the County's Comprehensive Plan (which are
based on official forecasts by the Office of Financial Management, State of
Washington).
The existing capacity (columns 3 and 4) is taken From Table SC-1, and includes
existing permanent and portable facilities.
The net reserve or deficiency is the difference between enrollment and capacity.
The net reserve or deficiency in permanent facilities (column 5) is calculated by
subtracting enrollment from permanent capacity (column 3 minus column 2). The
net reserve or deficiency in all facilities (column 6) is calculated by subtracting
enrollment from both permanent and intedm capacity (add columns 3 and 4, then
subtract column 2). If capacity is less than enrollment, the district has a "reserve"
that can accommodate future enrollment. If capacity is less than enrollment, the.
district has a "deficiency" which can be addressed by adding capacity (see Table
SC-4) or by changing the standard for level of service as pa~ of the annual
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 54 1998-09-08
E. Schools
· "'B~emedon SC~I' Oi~rfc~ Cap~C~y R~quireme~ · · ·
(~) (2) (3) (4} ...(s) ".. : (e)
~. .. ....
~ · : :. .. or "· ~... Net: ~e
i .F~n~ .... '.. '~nc~. ': '..:'.:~r:' .'
I.'~ ~' ~rd~" :: '~,~.: ' ~,~' ::: "'~~' ~".:
.. . .
~ '.: ~C~ facil~. ~ .. all fadi~.
E!emen~ Schools (K-5)
1996 A~ual 2.938 3,585 250 647 897
1996-2002: Gro~h 722 -722 -722
Total as of 2002 3,660 3,585 250 -75 175
Capac~ Projects -
None Scheduled"
Middle/Jr. High Schools (6-9)
1996 Actual 1,836 1,925 115 89 248
1996-2002: Gro~h ~0 -220 -220
Total as of 2002 2,0~6 1,925 115 -131 28
Capac~ Projects -
None Scheduled ~
Senior High Schools (10-12)
1996 Actual 1,689 1,275 115 ~14 -229
1996-2002: Gro~h 30 -30 -30
Total as of 2002 1,719 1,275 115 ~ -329
Capaci~ Projects -
None Scheduled"
· * The capac~ deficiency does not equal or exceed the capac~ of an add~onal school. No new school
for this grade level'is included in the Distdct's 6-year Cap~al Facil~es Plan. A replacement or
moderniza~on is required.
d. Plans of Other Providers
The Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element projects facility
needs for all school districts in the County, including the Bremerton School
District. This element is a valuable resource for comparing class size, school
size, construction costs, etc. between districts.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 55 1998-09-08
E. Schools
3. ProDosed Facilities
a. Elementary School Capacity Requirements
Through the year 2002, the Brernerton School District will not need any additional
permanent space for elementary students. Some existing space does require
replacement or modernization.
b. Middle School/Junior HiGh School Caloacity ReGuirements
Through the year 2002, the Bremerton School Distdct will need additional
permanent space for 131 middle school/junior high school students. Since this
capacity deficiency does not equal or exceed the capacity of an additional middle
school oriunior high school, the District does not include a new middle/junior high
school in its capital facilities plan through the 2002-03 school year. Some existing
space does require replacement or modernization.
c. Senior Hi.oh School Cai3acity Requirements
By the year 2002, the Bremerton School District will need permanent space for
444 senior high school students. Since this capacity deficiency does not equal or
exceed the capacity of an additional senior high school, the District does not
include a new senior high school in its capital facilities plan through the 2002-03
school year.
d. Non-Cal3acity Requirements
This analysis of capacity does not address the need to modernize or replace "
existing facilities, but the District has determined the need for such capital
projects, and they are included in the capital improvements projects and financing
plan listed below. (Table SC-4)
4. Six-Year Financial Plan
The Six-Year Financial Plan for Schools is included in Section K of this CFP.
SCH(:X:)L97.CC
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 56 1998-09-08
E. Scheels
Figure CF-8 Bremerton School District
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 57 1998-09-08
H. Stormwater
Stormwater facilities are provided by the Bremenon Department of Public Works & Utilities, The
Stormwater Utility was formed by ordinance in 1994 as a funding source for the stormwater
program mandated by the Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan. The mission of the
Program is to control flooding, enhance water quality, and protect sensitive habitat areas and
local aquifers. A dr3~ Stormw3tor M~nagomont Plan wac proparod during 1006 & 100~ and ic
oxpoctod to bo 3doptod in 1007.
The City's stormwater service area is the City limits. There are 14 drainage basins located within
the developed portions of Bremerton. These drainage basins closely conform to the limits of the
sewer basins identified in the City's Wastewater Comprehensive Plan. Additional drainage
basins within the Utility Owned Lands are also within the service area.
1. Inventon/of Existing Facilities
With the exception of a few more recent developments, the existing drainage system
within the City can be characterized as a conveyance system of surface drainage swales
and a sedes of pipes which collect and route drainage away from homes and businesses
as shown Exhibit 4-1.
The City has a storm drainage system with partial sewage separation. The City's adopted
Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Reduction Plan will separate stormwater from the
existing sewage collection system and limit CSOs to no more than one per year .oer
outfall.
A number of natural drainage facilities exist in the Bremerton drainage system. These
natural systems include swales, channels, creeks, ravines, and natural drainage ways
that discharge directly to madne waters. The City is responsible for maintaining three
detention facilities. These facilities are located near Loxie Eagans Blvd. & Arsenal Way,
_ Oyster Bay Avenue & Loxie Eagans, and Ridgetop Circle & Monticola Ddve (Holly Terrace
West Addition). The City's stormwater conveyance system consists of approximately 52
miles of pipes ranging for 8" to 54" in diameter. An estimated 60% of the sanitary sewer
system is composed of combined sewers which carry sanitary and stormwater flows.
Bremerton currently has 14 developed drainage basins. The basins include those areas
outside of the City limits that drain into the City and contribute runoff to some of the City's
localized drainage problems. The City's stormwater basin area is 8,564 acre feet. The
majodty of undeveloped Utility Owned Land is not included in this inventory. (Table SW-1)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 58 1998~09-08
Stormwater
Inventory of Capital Facilities: Storm Water Basins
Basin Name ~ Location - Drainage ! Acres
1. Anderson Avenue N. shores of W. Brem. - Port Wn. Narrows 400
2. Callow Avenue Central W. Brem. - Sinclair Inlet 650
3. Cherry Avenue E. Brem. NE of Warren Ave. Bddge - Port Wn. Narrows 250
4. East Park E. Brem. S of Sylvan Way - Port Wn. Narrows 330
5. Kitsap Lake W. Brem surrounding Kitsap Lake - Chico Bay 1,550
6. Oyster Bay NW part of W. Brem - Oyster Bay &Ostrich Bay 1,575
7. Pacific Avenue SE part of W. Brem incl. Ferry Terminal - Sinclair Inlet 150
8. Phinney Bay N central part of W. Brem - Phinney Bay 225
9. Pine Road W part of E. Brain. - Port Wn. Narrows 680
10. Sinclair Park SW portion of W. Brem - 1,400
11. Stevens Canyon E. Brem. in vicinity of Wheaton/Sylvan - Port Wn. Narrows 350
12. Tracyton Beach Along W. edge of c~/limits in E. Brem - Port Wn. Narrows 60
13. Trenton Avenue E part of E. Brem - Port Wn. Narrows & Port Orchard Bay 670
14. Warren Avenue Downtown Bremerton - Port Wn. Narrows 275
Total = 8,565
Source: City of Bremerton Draft Storm water Management Plan.
2. Forecast of Future Needs
a. Existing Demand
Water Quality -- The City of Bremerton established a policy requiring detention
facilities on development projects in 1980. The guidelines for sizing these
facilities limited the runoff rate to 0.2 CFS/acre based on a 25-year storm event.
Since 1994, the City has required all development to meet the requirements of the
"Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin.
Conveyance -- A complete analysis has not been performed on the City's existing
storm drainage system to determine the capacity of the components. This
analysis will be conducted over the next five years as part of the proposed
drainage basin assessments.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 59 1998-09-08
Stormwater
b. Level of Service (LOS)
Water Quality - Development projects must meet the requirements of the
"Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin", "or other
technicaliy equivalent manual adopted by the City of Bremerton, which includes
providing water quality enhancement for 6-month, 24-.hour storm and stream bank
erosion control by releasing one-half of the predeveloped 2-year/24--hour duration
rate during a 2-year/24-hour duration event, and matching predeveloped 1 O-year
and 100-year/24 -hour duration runoff rates. Construction sites are also required
to provide erosion and sedimentation controls for up to the 2-year storm event.
Conveyance - Storm systems constructed as part of the City's CSO Reduction
Plan will be designed to handle a 25-year storm. The City will be conducting
drainage basin assessments as part of the storm water program. These
assessments will include the identification of storm drainage conveyance system
capacities. Based on the outcome of these assessments, a recommended level
of service will be determined for existing systems. The drainage problems
identified in the storm water capital program are based on conditions observed in
the field and represent conveyance problems that occur annually.
c. Future Demand
Water Quality -- Development will be required to meet the Level of Service
requirements defined above. Regional water quality facilities maybe identified in
future drainage basin assessments.
Conveyance -- The impact of additional impervious sudaces from development on
the conveyance system will be mitigated by the limitations to the runoff rate to
0.2CFS/acre based on a 25-year storm.
d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements
The City's CSO Reduction Plan identifies construction of separate stormwater
conveyance systems in the majority of the City's drainage basins. These
improvements will address most of the drainage problems identified. The City's
2."'-fi Stormwater Management Plan identified three capital projects, not included
in the CSO Reduction Plan, necessary to improve conveyance system capacity.
These projects will be included in the 1999 update to the CSO reduction plan.
e. Plans of Other Providers
The City and Kitsap County share responsibility for a number of drainage basins.
The water quality standards of the City and Kitsap County are consistent.
Coordination between the City and Kitsap County will required regarding the
downstream conveyance systems within these basins.
3. Proposed Facilities Improvements
The Drcfi Stormwater Plan idehti~es eleven, existing flooding problems and recommends
solutions to alleviate these problems. Many of these drainage problems will be reduced or
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 60 1998-09-08
Sto~ter
eliminated by CSO sewer separation projects. A few will be addressed during annual
maintenance. ('Fable SW-2)
· Table SW-2
Major Flood Control Capital. Improvement Projects and'coSts
Project # Basin' ' Project:: Co~t (1994-$)
C:P ~I Sinclair Park Ul:.grade piping and detention at Kean and Rogers St. 851.000
CIP ~r2 Stevens Piping improvements at Robin and Dibb Streets i 170,000
Canyon
CIP #3 Pacific Avenue Piping improvements along Park Avenue, 5th St to 250,000
Burwell
Total = 1,271,000
Source: Draft Storm water Management Plan
The Dr:ft, Stormwater Plan identifies a number of small capital projects that need to be
performed on an annual basis. The Dr:fi Plan recommends that the City needs to implement a
series of storm drainage improvements over a multi-year planning period, and d~velop an
effective City-wide inspection and maintenance program. (Table SW-2)
4. Six-Year Financial Plan '
The six-year financial plan for stormwater facilities is included in Section K.
CFP Stormwater 1G<:jB.doc
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 61 1998-09-08
i' ....-~ ~' '~/ t ~-,t i~,-~-
,X.~ ~~ .X'~ ~ - ~ ~~- -~' ' ~
, , ~ /
FIGURE CF-~ ~R~MERTON STORMWATER DRAINAGE BASINS
D~FT Cap~al Facili~es Program 62 1998-09-08
I. Transportation
This section is a summary of information contained in the Transportation Element of the
Comprehensive Plan.
1. Inventory of Existinq Facilities
Bremerton's transportation system generally consists of streets, highways, sidewalks,
ferdes, and public transit. The Transportation Element includes the following information
on existing facilities:
n i|ities. "' "' ."i
: ' "":':"' "': :" I""" Cap City ''
:Type. . ..... ..... :. : i'. .. i
streets and Highways
· Principal Artedals (See Transportation Element Table
1)
· Minor Artedals (See Transportation Element Table
1)
· Collector Artedals (See Transportation Element Table ,
1)
. Residential Streets (Not inventoded)
Mass Transit
· Kitsap Transit (See Transportation Element pg. 20)
. Washington State Ferdes: Bremerton- (See Transportation Element pg. 20)
Seattle
· Hoduck Transportation Co.: Bremerton-Port (See Transportation Element pg. 20)
Orchard
Source: Transportation Element "F"
2. Forecast of Future Needs -- Level of Service (LOS) Standard
Levels of Service (LOS) is an estimate of the quality and performance of transpodation
facility operations in a community. The Transportation Element measures LOS by
calculating the volume to capacity ratio (V/C) of the midblock of a roadway, using a range
from A (free flow) to F (stop-and-go traffic).
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 63 1998-09-08
Transpodation
(a) Current Level of Service
The following existing roadway sections exceed or are close to exceeding a Level
of Service D (Volume/Capacity Ratio .90) threshold durfng the PM peak hour:
...... Table TR-2
Existing Level of Service -- Transportation
Street i Section ! VIC Ratio LOS
Bur~veil ;~/arren tc Naval 0.7' : D
I
SR 3C4 F'ecle to Farragut O 9' E I
· (;tseD/Vav Callow to SR3 ~ 87 ":.
Manette Bncge .... 0 89 D
Warren : ':h to Br:dge 3.8 --":'
--~{ar'eq .'.Whoarc.q! Rrlcge :c Cal:ahan __ 0 9-3 E
Sct. rce: Tacle · --. -_'x;s;:ng Ccrr;dor Love= c' SeP;'ce, ,'.'ar;spcr:a,'icn Eien':enr
(b) Recommended Level of Service ('LOS)
The Transportation Eiement establishes the following level of service standards:
· WheatonA/Varren Corridor -- LOS F with V/C threshold of 1.06
· Kitsap Way Corridor - LOS E or better (V/C less than or equal to 1.00
' · Manette Bridge -- LOS E or better (V/C less than or equal to 1.00)
· All Other Arterial Streets -- LOS D or better (v/c less than or equal to 0.9)
3. Six-year Financial Plan
The six-year financial plan for transportation facilities is included in Section J of this
Capital Facilities Program.
CFP Transportation 19<:jS.doc
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 64 1998-09-08
.- .....~ .......~--~ ............~~~ ....~";~" .. b--. ~. ~Z'?';~
..:. 2~:
. ~ ..........:~'~ /~ ~-~=~'--~---~--~----~ ::.:::..~:~:
~ .. /.~,:,'~'~'-~~ ..........
F"~ --~ : -.
~- ~ .... g,,,, ~ ~ ~ ,'
F~' ..~ ~~ [' ~] /r" · , ~ '
~.,,~..~ -,-,~. ~,.;,.-,~ ~ ....~ ..... , ~..
.,~ .......% .~'~ '~
,~ .....~ , ~ ~ ' ,,, ......
.... ~~ ~
," t ~ ~
,_, ,~, .~. ,
,,,, ,
L~/' I "
........................ ~ .......
........ ..........
., .y"',..'~ ~ :~ ............
~ ~-, .......
.......................................... ~,,..~ .................· ,"'~ t ~,~:7,~I
.... =~:::::--~ ........~M'~: .........,....~ ~~~<~:~: .......
~,~ ~'~ ....... .
~:::, / - ......
sc~uE CITY OF BREMERTON THE CITY OF
HORIZD.t.s. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
~ U~LITIES BREMERTON
PLOT 1:1 ENGINEERING D~V~S~O~ ARTERIAL STREETS
DRAWING NO. D~WN BY: S.M.J. DESIGN BY: ~CHECKED BY: SHE~
ARTSMALL DATE 9 -98 DATE DATE 1 OF 1
D~ Cap~al Facil~es Program 65 1998-09-08
J. Water
The City of Bremerton Water Utility provides potable water for Bremerton and the surrounding
area. A complete inventory. analysis of need, and capital facilities program is provided in the
1992 City of Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan (also known as the Bremerton Water
Plan) adopted by the Washington State Department of Health in 1993 and the Bremerton City
Council in 1994. The next update of the Bremerton Water Plan is required by October 1999.
1. Inventon/of Existinq Facilities
(a) Service Area
The Utility services approximately 58,000 residents in Bremerton (38,000) and
portions of Kitsap County (20,000), including the Gorst area and the western
portion of the Manette Peninsula. The service area includes the Olympic View
Industrial Park and the Bremerton National Airport. The Utility also is under
contract to provide water to the Tracyton and Rocky Point Water Districts. In
addition, the Utility contracts to supply water to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
(PSNS) and to the City of Port Orchard.
The current service area includes approximately 5,300 acres within the Bremerton
City limits, and approximately 6,800 acres within unincorporated Kjtsap County.
(See Figure CF-8 "Bremerton Water Plan Service Map".) The Kits. ap County
Coordinated Water System Plan contains an lntedocal Agreement for Establishing
Water Utility Service Area Boundaries, but this 3groomont has not yot boon
submittod b,! Bromorton, and in addition, the City has service area agreements
with North Perry, Silverdale. Sunnyslope. Rocky Point. and Tracyton water
districts.
(b) Facilities/Water RiGhts
The City of Bremerton Water Utility supply system consists of Union River
Reservoir behind the Casad Dam, 12 production wells, 204 miles of water pipe,
fourteen pressure reducing stations, 16 water storage reservoirs, and 14 pump
and booster stations. (Table WA-1) Approximately 60 percent of the supply
comes from the 2,764 acre Union River watershed, which is 98 percent owned
and controlled by the City. Wells in several local aquifers supply groundwater to
the system. Current average daily demand is approximately 8 million gallons per
day (MGD).
There are six pressure zones in the system: East (E) 240, E 398 E 490, West (VV)
256, W 440, and W 517. These zones are designated by the overflow elevations
in Utility reservoirs..P4anc 3ro boing m3do for bNo additional procz.,uro zonoc
(W640 3nd W660). Two additional pressure zones (W540 and 650) are currently
being designed. Construction on the W650 zone is scheduled to begin in 1999,
with the W540 zone scheduled to begin in 2001. Both zones include pump
stations and reservoirs.
Bremerton's water supplies consist of 10,689 pdmary acre-feet (1,408
supplementary acre-feet) of groundwater and a firm yield from the Union River of
3.8 MGD. Instantaneous rights include 40 cubic feet per second (cfs) (17,952
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 66 1998-09-08
Water
gpm) on the Union River watershed and 6350 gallons per minute (gpm)
groundwater. All water in use by the City has been properly appropriated through
certificates of water rights or claims. Historically used surface water claims are
maintained for potential emergency and future use pending required treatment.
Bremerton's Union River surface source is of such excellent quality that the City is
currently approved by the State Department of Health to remain un~ltered.
Sources are disinfected with chlorine. The water system control and alarm is
provided through a telemetry system. Updates to the telemetry system are
planned for 1997-2000, including conversion to radio telemetr~. Operation staff
are state certified, and the system is operated in compliance with all federal and
state regulations. (Table WA-1)
For com.01i~nce with the Le~d and Cogper RUleL the City is constructing a
Corrosion Control Facilitv that will inject Caustic Soda (NoaH) into the water
entedng the water system at Reservoir No. 4. The facility is scheduled to be
ol;eratinc~ by November 1998,
-Thc City may al..~o booin ~uoddation of thc wetc-r SyStC,T,. Fluoddc may be added
to tho wator at Rcsorvoir No. 4, and also at four wcll sitcs whioh indudc Welt,3 9~
13, 1 q, and Andcr3on Crock. If iml;}lcmcntod, thc ~uoddation ohc, rnicel oddcd te
-thc watcr supply at Rc~rYoir No. q would bc I lydrofluooilicio Add (I
,Sodium Fluoddo (NnF) is tho chomioal which ~vould bc uscd at thc four well sits3,
(c) Fire Flows
The Utility is generally capable of meeting Kjtsap County Ordinance fire flows,
which are considered to be minimums for new construction. However the
Brernerton Water P/an recommends that fire flows be designed to meet the
significantly higher Insurance Services (ISO) Standards. Under peak houdy flow
conditions, a minimum of 30 psi (new mains) residual system pressure without fire
flows in water mains should be maintained to meet State Department of Health
standards.
(d) Capacity
The current capacity of the water system on an annual average is 12 million
gallons per day (MGD). The daily capacity of the system with groundwater
sources only is 8.7, while the capacity with groundwater and surface sources at
current hydraulic capability is 21.5 MGD.
The capacity varies because the Union River is used to supply the average day
demands of the system. The surface supply can be varied between zero and 15.5
MGD as long as annual average firm yield of 3.8 MGD and water quality limits are
not exceeded. Note that not all sources can be used to maximum capacity at the
same time, due to limited hydraulic capacity of the transmission mains or water
dght conditions.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 67 1998-09-22
Water
TableWA-1
:
!nv~ntoq of Capital Facilities: Water Supply
Facilities Address j Capacity
Surface Wmer Hydraulic Capacity MGD)
Union River Watershed 15.5
....... Surface Water Subtotal = 15.50
i Groundwater CaFac:ty (gpm)
I ;r2-R - Anderson Greek Wei~ 2380 Anderscn
2. ~r3 - Anderson Creek Well 2380 Anderson Hill Rd SW 400
3. #7 -Anderson Creek Well 2731 State Highway 16 450
4. #8- Anderson Creek Well 2651 State Highway 16 650
5. #9 - Bddle Ridge Well 318 NW Firway Lane 230
8. #13 - Vena Well 50 NE Vena Avenue 600
7. #14 - East Zone 240 Well 5853 Central Valley Road NE 270
8. #15 - Pistol Range Well 6581 W. Old Bellair Highway 150
9. #17 - Pistol Range Well 6581 W. Old Bellair Highway 760
10. #18 - Twin Lakes Well 8301 W. Old Belfair Highway 370
11. #19 - Golf Course Well 7061 W. Old Belfair Highway 300
, 12. ¢r20 - Twin Lakes Well 8301 W. Old Bellair Highway 1,100
' 1~3. ¢r21 - Silverdale Mobile Home Estates Well 903 NE Saturn Lane (500)
(pending application) Future production =
14. Gorst Well (pending application) Old Beifair Highway (400)
Future production =
Current Groundwater Sub-Total (gpm) = 6,080
....... Current Groundwater Sub-Total ('MGD) = 8.70
' 5..=S #' - Gcrst Creek ~omerge,:cy su.c~'iy _elftar ;,/aLey .c,.oac - ,Gorst Creek N,'A
only)
16. PS ~r2 - Anderson Creek 2380 Anderson Hill Road 2,250
17. PS #3 (not in uc, o emergency use only) 7061 Beifair Valley Road 400
18. PS ~ 1335 Jones St. (West Brain.) 800
19. PS #11 844 Callahan Drive 1,400
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 68 1998-09-08
Water
.r Tab~ WA,4 '
i Inventory of Capital Facilities: Wafer 8apply
f ,
.' Facilities [ Address ~ Capacib/
38. =,eseP~c:r #~ 3 5785 ;mpenal Way SW, Pt. 0.21
Orchard - Port of Brem. Industrial
Park
39. Reservoir #11 844 Cailahan Drive 1.58
40. Reservoir #12 3029 Olympus [::)rive 2.0
41. Reservoir #13 2929 Ofympus Drive 0.80
42. Reservoir #14 1628 Hayward Avenue ~.. E. 17th 2.0
43. Reservoir #15 1925 Cheryi Street @ Forest Ddve 1.0
44. Reservoir #16 260 Sugarpine - Tracyton 1.0
Watershed
45. Reservoir #17 400 Ridge Lane NE @ Sandra 1.0
Lane
46. Reservoir #18 1925 NE Cheryl Street @ Forest 1.0
Dr.
47. Reservoir #19 2628 Ash Street ~.. Cherry Ave 2.0
48. Reservoir ~r20 400 Ridge Lane NE @ Sandra 1.0
Lane
49. Reservoir #21 2132 Lakehurst Drive - NAD Park 3.0
Distribu~on Reservoir Total = 33
.
Tra .....
[_~ nsmisslon Main Piping Capacity (Feet)
'1
· 12" - 36" Wa,ver :J.a.ns Var!cus ^"i ·148
I
I
; 2" -: 2" Water :,!~::r~s ......
..... v,..,, c...;s 1 ·2': !
I ........................
. .v c.n_s ...................... VaP. OLS 4~ Q4c
................................ -:__-, .
i ~.. .
I ,.. '/',/a:,.:.r ".~'-. ns ' '/?.r'c~:s : 2~7
I ...............................................................
L._s_"_ '.".q a_:? r_.'4, ':.ts_' ...............................:.Z) U_c ......7
: "" Wa~.or M.a.ns I Var!c,,:s ...... : '55.653
' ~' ':i ',"
3" ~ .....r .",la:rs Var'c.'..'s 4.533
..................................................... ..,
2'" ',~L-.:',c.r '.,!a:::~ ...... Var!,':.Ls ,31.344 'i
Distrshutior .=:p:.~,:; Systen'; S,:b.-Tetal =: 1,211,729.00
DRAFT Capital FacilYdes Program 70 1998-09-08
Water
TabbWA-1
Inventory of Capital Facir~ties: Water Supply
Facilities f Address Capacity
20. PS #12 3029 Olympus Drive 950
21. PS #13 2929 Olympus Drive 500
:22. PS #14 2101 Schlev BIvd
I 23..=S ~16 50 NE Vena Ave 1.250
_.24~ PS ~'." CId Belfa~r ~--wy 1.500
: ;UmD Sta-qcn Sus-'c~'a: = 9 875
__Booster Pump StationsPumping Capacity (gpm)
· ;2~' S,r..h S'.roc{ ~-".-.
2e. ---.c',:ster Stab;on ~3 : 3003 17th Street 300
27. Booster Station #4 3301 First Street 100
28. Booster Station #5 589 Lebo Blvd 1,000
...2~:..u_.r~'~.c_.c;~ ~.C~.st_~.~L~t~tj._~p,..'.~. -_.~_4..~g.'.,-~.'.a,~,.,..c~.:.e ._:,_,z=....'~'.;:::.5.;_ ~2--~..
._ ......................... Bccs:er .=ur:'.: Stadons Sdc-'ota~ = I ~'~C
I =ump Sta:icns ';'c:ai = ': .505
- Reservoirs - Raw WaterStorage Capacity.(MG_L'
!._29.._'.~:;"._.~n_.?ve- =.ese-~cir ~;e,~:,':c C~5a.;1. ;a:?.~ :i Unmn R~ver ',%'a~em~'ed ' .35G
! 3 :. ~'es. '~22 ! McKorma .=aFs
F.;_2.._-:.:','i__~,'~'~,'~ .~__";fX '."._ .'_~×;_v'_'iC/",2_*_'j' .........,_" :~.~r_(;~l_:r;.ok ;,'.'3;crc:~c,<j
I "
i- ..................................................... Rc. scrvc'rs .'Raw Water) T:;..'ai =
I Resen,,oirs - Distribution Storage{MG)
~ ..
}_.-, _ .=,,_e:.s?rvc.r .-~ ......... _.4.80._'. R._o. oseve;: Blvd i I C
.] 35. ~es~:r';o'r :5 3200 Firs; Stree: ;=crest :~id<;e 3.0
Park)
36. Reservoir ~ 5144 Francis Street @ Eden Road 0.15
37. Reservoir #-8 , 7300 Werner Road 2.54
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 69 1998-09-08
Water
Table WA-1
Inventory of Capital Facilities: Water 8.upply
I
Facilities i Address Capacity
Total Piping System = 1,412,877.00
2. Forecast of Future Needs
(a) Existinq Demand
The average daily water system demand varies depending on weather conditions,
but averages about 8-_4. 8.2. million gallons per day (MGD).
Year Averaqe Day Demand (MGD)
1990 9.35
1991 8.71
1992 8.48
1993 7.73
1994 8.29
1995 7.89
1996 7.43
1997 7.'!2 7.83
Approximately 33 percent of the average daily demand comes from the Puget
Sound Naval Shipyard, the largest single water user. Approximately :;7-8 80
percent of the water demand is "in-City" demand, and =~. 2._Q percent is o~'side the
city limits. Average day demand is affected by the year's ~n patterns and other
factors - for example, 1993 was a wet summer, resulting in less outside water
use. However, the highest peak day ever recorded was dudng unusually low
temperatures in December 1990 when pipes broke and customers ran water to
prevent pipes from freezing. In 1992, Seattle's drought response media campaign
affected Bremerton customers' water use, even though our rocorvoir the City's
watershed was not experiencing a drought. The City's conservation program
provides customer information on reducing both indoor and landscape water use.
(b) Level of Service (LOS) Standard
Tho oStimatod 1000 LOS ic 106 gallonc pot capita por day (gpc, d). Tho City'c
Concorv,ation .n. rogram" ic oxpoctod to roduoo domoctic unit ooncumption by 3%
by 1006, to 103 gpod and b7 6% by yoar 2000, to 100 gpcd. Current LOS is 103
GPCD. The City's Conservation Program is expected to reduce domestic unit
consumption by the year 2000 to 100 GPCD. Domestic unit demands are then
expected to remain constant through the year 2014.
· C'_'rrcnt .1990 LOS = 106 gallons per capita per day (GPCD)
· Current LOS, = 103 GPCD
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 71 1998~09-08
Water
· Recommended LOS = 100 GPCD
(c) Future Demand
The 1992 Bremenon Water Plan identifies needs for a 20 year planning pedod
from 1990 to 2010. Dudng that time it is expected that supply capacity to meet
typical maximum day demands (MDO) will increase 26.99 mgd by year 2010.
(Table WA-2)
Tho Wotor Plan damand projoctjonc woro basod en outdotad J3opula~ioa foreeastc dorivod
from a varioty of courooc, inoluding pact ironale, the K~¥-alt CouRts/_r',otgortmo~t of
Community Dovotopmont, and tho formor ,Rugel ~eund Couaeil of CovoFRmeRtc
(F'~Cn-C)./%lthough tho projootjonc woro not booed eR tho Ki~ap ,q. ogieRal Planning
Council (K.qPC) popularjan forooact and cubaroe alloeationc, the KFiPC allesationc fall
within tho low to high rango uc, od to forocac, t wetoF G/stem damand.
The 1999 Ul;xJate to the Water System Comprehensive Plan will ulDdate the Water System
Plan demand projections.
i 'i
i Table WA-:Z
I Existing and Potential Water Supply
i Water Source ~DailYSup. l?_ly (m_cjd) Annual Supply (ac-ft)
I ............
~ --.Ex~s:ir:c'.; ScLrces ......... ~_'_-..2._.3.._.7 ......... 13.46~ ·; 6 565
~ .DCtS.'.t,'ai S;.,UiC,~S
~ ..... ; ' 7- - · 2.2 7 A -..-
iTota: Sccrces 2C '. - 35 ~ 2'5 G3C - 24 32,5 '
I
~ Scur,-.e. ~re:';'ie,,'s,r: Wa:er ,,t/Sten? C~mpr.r.t:,.,?r,s.ve =!~r: Tai'-'.e ~-7 i
It is projected that if pending water dghts certificates are secured, then no
additional sources will be needed to meet the total demand through the next six
years. However, future water sources will need to be secured to meet anticipated
demands beyond year 2000. (Table WA-3)
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 72 1998-09-08
Water
" Future Need:.. Wat.,er
Year _: Demand (Popubl:ion in City-County Avg. Day Damanti
Service Area}' 'MGD
Six-Year Need
1994 * 56,701 9.04
1995-2000 (new) 9,686 4.20
Total as of 2000 * 66,387 13.24
~!::~:~:::'-.-, ::-:..-::,-: ..:.... ,:,... ,......
2000-2012 11,764 4.38
Total as of 2012 78,151 12.17'
Sources: Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan, updated by Bremerton Water Utility
· 1994 & 2000 demand - from Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, December 23, 1996
Assumptions:2000: Pop. × 103 gallons/capita + 3.2 MG for PSNS
2014: Pop. X 100 gallons/capita + 3.2 MG for PSNS
3. Proposed Facilitv Improvements
The Bremerton Water Plan recommends that an additional 0.7 mgd of groundwater
supply should be developed by 1995 and a total of 1.4 mgd should be developed by year
2000, (7'able WA-2) The City has two additional wells drilled and awaiting water rights.
Current regulatory and legal uncertainty at the State level precludes processing of water
rights applications except under emergency conditions.
The Water Plan concludes that existing distribution system is capable of meeting typical
system demands. Improvements in transmission and distribution mains are necessary to
improve flows and pressures in certain areas and to replace undersized or sub-standard
facilities.
(a) Water Quality
Meeting strict Federal and State water quality standards is a primary objective of
the City. Ddnking water is regularly tested at the sources and in the distribution
system.
To continue to use the un~ltered Union River source, the City should continue to
pursue either acquisition or controlling agreements over remaining private lands
within the watershed, and should vigorously implement the Watershed Control
Plan. Responsible operation of the entire water system is critical to maintaining
compliance with the non-filtration status of the sudace water treatment
regulations. Even with these precautions, a drastic change in source quality or
changes in regulations could require the City to provide filtration further treatment
DRAFT Capital Facili'des Program 73 1998-09-08
Water
suCh as o:,onation or
Groundwater wells water quality will be ensured through a Wellhead Protection
Program, implemented in 1996.
(b) Storacle
Storage needs include the E398 zone and the Industrial Park and Airport area, no
additional storage is needed to meet current demand. Adding such ctorogo ic tho
ros~oonc~bility of tho .r'~ort of ~romorton. By year 2010 a total of 22.5 million gallons
(MG) of system wide storage is expected to be required. The system currently
has 3'f.2 ~ MG of storage available, pdmadly in the lower elevation zones in
the developed parts of the city.
Two additional pressure zones (W540, and 650) are currently beine desiened.
Construction on the W650 zone is scheduled to begin in 1999, with the W540
zone scheduled to begin in 2001. Both zones include pump stations and
reservoirs.
Prior to year 20'10, additional storage will be required to c, orvo tv,,o now Woct
.gromorton zonoc south of K!tc~p Loko 0N660) and south ef Corot (VV64g).
Additional stor3go chould nlco bo prcy~idod north of the East Bremerton city limits.
(c) Distribution System
West Bremerton industrial/commercial areas have good fire flow capacity.
Toward Jackson Park, fire flow capacity meets Kitsap County guidelines but is
less than ISO recommendations for multi-family residential housing. Several
improvements are needed to improve fire flow capacity in the East 398 Zone, west
of the Brownsville Highway, Changing tho ch-~po of thic long norrow zono sorvioo
oro,.'~ by trading tho northore part of tho zono of tho North ,~om/AveRue Wntor
.Gistdot in oxch-~ngo for an oquiv. alont part of thoir sorvioo oroa oaot of tho eeRtFOI
Eact 3Femorton c_,orvioo oroo may bo an oooRemioal w,.~/to impFo~,,e corvico to
both orooc. Pump station capacity will need to be added to serve new west zones
south of Kitsap Lake and south of Gorst. The Utility should continue to routinely
replace small sub-standard water mains. Initial replacement projects should
concentrate on mitigating low-pressure problems in the Sherman Heights area.
The existing telemetry and control system will require upgrading and maintenance
so the Utility can moro of~oiontly control continue to improve the water system.
(d) Plans of Other Providers
There are no other providers of potable water within the City. However, there are
several nearby water districts, public utility districts and municipalities that may
have interests in local surface and groundwater resources. These include:
Silverdale Water District No. 16; North Perry Avenue Water District; Erland Point
Water District; Sunnyslope Water District; City of Port Orchard Water District; and
McCormick Woods development. An unclaimed area exists between the City
Water Utility and the Edand Point Water Distdct service areas. Unclaimed areas
also exist south, east and west of the Utility's watershed.
The Kitsap Cout~ty Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), a regional water
supply, transmission, and storage plan, was developed by the Water Utility
Coordinating Committee (WUCC) to comply with state law. The plan assesses
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 74 1998-09-08
Water
water supply needs in Kjtsap County and presents a program to provide water
supply and service to users. The plan., o~pestod to bo approvod by tho St-~to
Dop-~rtmont of: :ealth, provides a process and strategy for existing water utilities
to define their role in a program consistent with adopted land use policies and
projected growth strategy. The City is beainnina to alan for the uadate to the
CWSP.
4. Six-Year Financial Plan
Under the proposed LOS it is projected that no additional water sources will be needed to meet
the total demand through the next six years, providing water dghts are secured on two wells
which have already been ddlled.
The City pays for capital facilities through charges for service, but also through timber sales and
other non-revenue receipts. The six-year financial plan for water facilities is included in Section 3
of this Capital Facilities Program.
CFP Water 19<:JB.doc
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 75 1998-09-08
WATER
LEGEND
BREMERTON WATER SERVICE AREA
OTHER WATER DISTRICTS SERVED BY BREMERTON
'l' ~ ,_, NO1TH PERRY
WATER INLET
DIb
ROO~
SILVERDAI,F.
WATER DISTRICT '
BREM~ON
WATER CITY OF
~ BREMER ~
BREMERTON s~cz,~n
WATERSHED
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD
WATER
BREMERTON WATER PLAN
SERVICE AREA MAP
BREM_ZRTON SUNNYSLOPE
////~ WATER
~VATER DISTRICT
................... ~
F'~gun CF-11 Water Plan Service Area
DRAFT Capitl Facilities Program
K. Six-Year Finance Program
1. Introduction
A six-year finance program for capital facilities is one of the requirements of the Growth
Management Act. The six-year finance program for all capital facilities addressed in thSc
the Capital Facilities Program (CFP) is consolidated into this section.
Under the City's annual comprehensive plan review process, the Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) and CFP are developed together by City staff. Both are based on the
various plans for transportation, sewer, water, etc., which in turn are based on the City's
Land Use Element.
2. Projected Revenue and Expenses
The tables in this six-year finance program are excerpted from the summary tables of the
CIP. Additional details are contained in the body of the CIP. The contents of the tables
are as follows:
Summaries Pa.qe
· Total CIP ...................................................................78
· Water .........................................................................79
· Wastewater ...............................................................81
· Storm Water ..............................................................83
· Transportation ...........................................................84
· Parks .................................................................85
· Golf .................................................................87
· Engineering ...............................................................88
· General Fund .............................................................89
· Other Funds ...............................................................90
Sources of Fundinq
· Revenues for 1998 - 2003 C.I.P ................................91
Plans for Other AGencies
· Bremerton School District (to bo upd~tod) .................. 92
CFP 6 Year Finance Plan.doc
DRAFT Capital Faciliees Element 77 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program'~' A
C:TY CF BI~EMERTCN CA,oIT,,tL IMPROVE,%tENT ?RCGR, A0'~i
1991 - ;003 Ff~CGRAM
SUMMARY - TOTAL C:P
=~CR r 1SSBI :SS,ct ZL'CCI ZC(2~I Z,'~3ZI ZC(2:l
fscuRcEs cF =UNc~
Grant,~- CJSG r>t.4 105.5
G,'ants - Other O.O 4.2~34 3 ~.Q :4 '3 ! ~_C'(3.O 0O ~ O
S|crrnwa~er 46.0 94.5 2C70 50 O 53.:3 60.0 53.0
G. C. 8or~s - Vote~ 2.8g.~ ?~-.0 0.(3 5,5C0.0 0.O O.0 0.O
G.C. 8o¢',cs: Non-Voteci ?,,--t.5 10.0 0.0 3,1CC.0
Revenue ,=ends. 0.0 25C.rJ Q.2CC.O 10,250.0 5C"X3.0 550.0 0,3
Anensl Street ~01 5,0 5a~.5 ~2~,.-3 215.0 150.0 150.0 150.0
Real Eslate E.xc:s~ Ta~ 109 71.0 28C.7 5Q.O 1,05C.0 170.0 ,33.0 53.0
P.~n~erga~ Parx :'.C8 O.O 0.O 3.'3 C.O O.O 0.O O.0
Gc((~/vttn GGiI' Cauf's.e 4~7 ??4.0 188.4
E;uip. Renlal Reserve 510 0.0 E52.1 87~.2 5-~3.~ 374.7 3J-4.0 57 2
,=,ce-s~ve,,t Cap~iAsset 5.~, 0.0 285.0 ~25.0 125.0 -IOC.0 3C0.0 I75.:3
T[8(UATA) I 5.0 5,573.2 3.~C,..~ 1,75-4.0 360.4 0.0 0.0
FAUS 0.0 0.0 ,3.0 54.0 178.0 0.0 0.0
WSOOT 0.0 570.5 25=;.5 2C2.3, 415 0.0 0.0
Ccuney/Stace/F~ 0.0 237.5
Naw, 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Stre.e( Vac.~don O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O
Other 'rICO.0 110.0 2-=7'?~ J. CO ~7~0 I.CC,O.0 0.0
IGRANC TOTAL 9.524.0 I 25.575.2 ~7..:.4S0 30.0~5 I i 9.~68.4 f 7..=,~2,.7 5.5379
[INFrASTrUCTURE =RC,;ECTS ~.277,'.5 ~2.550.I 10.C41.5 17.552.2 4.~3~.0 t 4.4~7.0 4.ScJE.0
{FAC;L[T[ES =~CJE'STS 570.0 1.987 4 5.25',.7 I 1,293.5 3.597.5 t 2.282.3 1.015.0
[E,~UtPMENT &VEHICLES 5C8.5 9,377 ~.565.7 1.1794 9.S8.q. ~ 834.4 527_=
!G~A,'UO TOTAL 9.4,54.3 25.5752 I !7
[CrFFE.=,ENCES SOURCES LESS US~_S 70.3 ~ ~.:3 ~ C
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 78 1998-09-08
8ix-Ye.mr Fin.mn¢~ Program' ""
CRY GF BREMERTCN CAFfT,.IJ... IMP~CIVEME, i'T
19Sl. Z0O3 PRCGR.AM
SUMMARY -
:q~CR: :99~1 i9991 2.r'CCI Z".C~ 2-rDC:~!
SCURC,:.. CF =UNC::S
Dana · CZaG .!.,3 3.3 9..3 0 O C.:3 a 3 33
Crane - C:l~er 3.,' ~-."CC3 3.C i O.O 03 ,3 '3 3.3
Wacer 5C!.5 4,37~5 ~.~88.3 ] '~.22.-5 a 2.2~.3 :.Ece.: :.L-".:
',4/as(ewe(or 3.3 3 ..l 33 i a 3 33 go
S~crmv~cer 3 .l D: 0.3 0 O 0 Q ,3 .~
G.,3. BanDs - Vateel -~ 3 C: J.3 I C O 0O 9,3
G.9 Banes: Non--Vole<l 0.3 C.'3 30 i 3.0 O.O O O
.~evenue Bones. =3.,1 O.a 0.g 0.0 0,3 O.C
Arterial Slree( 101 3 '2 C,,3 gO C.0 ,3.0 9.~
Real Estale 5.xc:se Tax IO9 3.3 g C O O gO 0O ,3.j O '2
Parxs Caol~,l Fac:iity I 12 30 0.:3 O.g 0 0 ,30 0D
Penc:ergast .=srx 308 '33 0.0 0.O O.0 O.O ,30 03
GcK~ Mtn Gait' Course 407 3.,D O.C O.0 O.0 0.0 00
E~ula. Ran(el Reserve 510 0.0 0.C O.0 O.O 0.O 0.O 0.0
Rooseve,,t Ca¢ctal Asse( ~ O.O 0.0 I 0.O 0.0 O.O O.rD 0.0
TTE(UATA) '3.3 O ',3) 0.'D 0.0 0O 0.0 00
.=AUS O.O 0.,3 I 0'rJ C.O 0.0 0.O
INSOCT '~.O O.~ ~ 0O 0.O 0.O 0.0 0.rj
iSTEA. ',30 O.0 0.O 0.0 00 O.0 0.O
CountylS[ateyF'eci 3. '3 0:3 3.0 0.0 O.O 0.0 0.0
Navy, ,3.0 O.,l O.g 0.0 O.O 0.0 O.O
Stree( VacaUan j 3.,,~ 3.,,3 0.0 0.0' 0,O 0.0 0.9
Other .3,3 O.O 0 O 0.0 O.O 0.O 0.0
ITCTAL SOURCES i 5C~ ,5 t 7570.=. !.~_8.0 3,285.0 ~ 2.%c,2.0 2.~08.0 !
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
[jT;L~NA&.3 WARREN AVENUE BRIDGE MAIN !8.3 175.3
UTIL'C/A47 WEST 653 ZONE DEVELCPMENT , :C.0 ICQ.G 1,C50.0 1,000.0
tjT:UNAEI WEST ~ ZONE DEVELOPMENT 300 170.0 1.COO.0 2,1Z3.0
INS7"WAC1 12. DIET. WATER MAIN - SHCRE'NOOD OR TO RES 20.0 210.0
IN98WA01 WATER SYSTEM FLUOF~IDATION 54.-i 3CO.5
.UT[L'NA18 SR ;13 TRANSMISSION ,MAIN SYSTEM EMPRCVEME 75.'3 4.5C0.0
UTIUNABg CORROSION CONTROL TREATMENT FAC',LIT'r 280.0 910.0
UTIL'NA,~,8 RESE,:~VOIR SEISMIC IMPROVEMENTS ICC.0 100.0 1C<).0 1CO.0 103.0
UTIL'NA84 WATER ,MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.9 250.0
UTrL'NAF>i 18" SHERMAN HEIGHTS TRANSMISSION MAIN 3.4C.3
UTIL'NA2'3 E396 ZONE TRANSMISSION MAIN &STORAGE 1C.,3,Q 9~0.0
L,'TIL'NA27 PUMP ETA #14 RE,=LACEMENT & 12. TRANS. MAIN 50.0 9.:0.0 60.0
UTIUNA87 12' CISTRIBUTION WATE,R MAIN/13TH/HIGH/CH10 25.0
UT;UNA2 S',LVEROALE MOBILE ESTATES WELL 75.0
UTIUNA,4,5 DCMSEA WELL DEVELOPMENT
UTIUNA21 I EXTENSION 295.0
SUB-TOTAL 517 5 7.055 5 i.EO3 0 2,340.0 2.290.0 2.508 0 1._"2,2.0
FACILITIES PROJECTS
FAgTWAOI CASAD DAM E.ARLY WARNING 16.0 20.0 75.0 75.0
FA97WA03 RESERVOIR ;¢4 COVER 16.0
FA_qB~'IA01 OYSTER BAY 'LAY DOWN' YARD 20.0 20.0
UTIL'NA82 DETERIORATED METERS UPGRADE PROGRAM I00.0 1CO.0 1CO.O 1CO.0 ~OO.0 ICO.0
FASBVVA02 CASAD DAM INTAKE TOWE..,R SEISMIC UPGRAOE 120.0 680.0
SUB-TOTAL 25.0 l 3-c'<).0 315.0 855.0 1CO.O IOO.O 1COO
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 79 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program
CITY CF EiI~!SMF,.RTCIN C,,1J~fTAL
1991 - Z003 PRCGI~,M
SUMMARy
ECUIPMENT &
I
UTIL',.VAS~ UTIL;T'Y SYSTEM CONT.~CL & ~JCN. -'CUI~
[GRANC TCTAL ~C5
[C~FF'-i.=,,ENCE SCL'~CES LESS USES
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 80 1998-09-08
CRY CI= 8R,F..MERTCN C-,,,,~rT,,t/. LMPRIBVEJ,IENT PR~-,RAM
SUMMARY. 'NAi'T'EWATER
.,=FtICRI 19~-~1 t'g~gl
SOURCES CF =UNO:S
G~ne~"~l C.~v~rnmen~al 0.(] 0.0 O.O O.O O.O O.O 0.(]
smn~, - CCBG O.O 0.0 O.O 0.0 o.o O.o a.a
Grants · Other 0.0 104 3 Z 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Water 0.0 .3.'3 ! 30 0 0 00
Was:e.w~:er 4 5~0 3 3._':~.3 ~ '. 310.3
S~crrm. ra~e~ a.a o.s i a.,3 0.o
G.O, -~cncs - vo~e~ 0.0 J.~; '~O
G.O. Bane:',: Nan-',/o¢ec~ 0..3 a..J ,3.0 0 3 o.o 0.0 o..~
Revenue .%naB. g.0 c.,~ 0.0 o.g o.o 0:3 0.,~
Arterial SLree_~ I O 1 0.0 3.D rj.0 0.O 0.0 3.0 0 ..3
F~eam Es;a~e -Sxc:se 7zx ~Cg 3.3 0.0 .3.3
Pt, fl~ C~I::~,i F'3C:Jity 112 O.0 3..3 3.0
Pendefgast Pan< 30.8 0.0 0.'3 0.3 O.O 0.0 0.0
Go~d Mtn Go4 Course 407 ! O.O g.g O.0 0.0 0.0 0.,g 0.0
E.,.lu~p. Rental Reserve 510 ; ,3.0 '3.0 O.O ,;.O 0.O 0.G 0.3
Roosevelt C. apRat Asse{ 52.2. Q.Q 0:3 O.O 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0
TIB(UATA) .3.0 2,.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0..3
FAUS O.0 O.O 0..3 O.O 0.0 0.0 0.0
WSCOT 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.O 0.O 0.0 0.O
IST~J,. 0.O O.0 O.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Caunty/'Sta[e]Fed 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0'.0 0.0
Nsvy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0..3
S[ree~, Vacs~ien 0.0 0.3 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0
Cther 3. I CO.0 0..3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
[TOTAL SCURCES ~ 7.~210.3 i 4.C.,67 '3 I.'~0.0 i 1-KDS0 1.470.0 1.-c44.0 3.753.'3
1NPFL,~STRUCTURE PROJECTS
UTIL'~%'VI OYSTER BAY BASIN INTERCEPTOR 23,0 5,3.0 5~3.0
IN97V,/M/01 Am',iDERSCN COVE BAS;N CSO SEPARATION PROJ 30.0 115.3 578.0
UTiLW%,Vg CALLOW AVENUE DRAINAGE BASIN CSO PROj 7,-5,7.0 3.2'; 8.3 313.0 3,00~.3
INgT~'A'OZ WE~NE.~,ROAD SE"NER -7_XTENSION I
UTIUNW2 SE"NER MAiN RE?L_ACE,MENT PROGRAM ~"~.g.0 ~__..rj.0 -'2'2,0.0 ~'--'Y-3..0 ~"""0.0 ,T_~.O.O,.L
INggVv%'01 PfNE ROAD BAS;N CSO REDUCTION PROJECT 77.0 ~2.0
IN.c~BW'v'VC'ZCSO OETENT;CN STRUCTURES 10~3.0 I00.0 15~3.0 15,3.0 150.0
INggW%:'O2 EAST PARK BASIN CSO OVERFLOW RED. PRCJ. 73.0 65'7.0
IN~,g~,Wi03TRENTCN AVENUE BAS;N CSO OVERFLOW RED PRCJ 4~.0 428.0
INgBWVVOtlNVERTED SIPHON [SCL-~TION VALVES
INS, BW~I0 PORT WASHINGTON NARRCWS INVERTED S;PHON
[SUB-TOTAL [ 7.5~00i 3.Sc"'TD 1..~T5.0 ',.C, BS0 1,125.0 1,514.0 3,~8.0
FAC:LIT',ES PROJECTS
UTiL'¢,hV~ PUMP STATIONS ;MPROVEMENT PROGRA,M ~50~,.3 !70.0 ~80.0 1.03.0 200.0 210.C
UTILW~tV3 NE:N ROOF CN CONTROL BUILDING 15.0
LJT[LVV'~V2 V',~'v'TF~ F.RONTAG~ IMPROVEMENTS
SUB-T:TAL 0.0 I 1~.,3 IT0.0 180.0 205.0 2CC.O 210.0
EQUIP%lENT & VEHICLES
EQgg~h%N0 FUEL TANX R EPLACE,MENT (REG ULATORY MANDATE) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
UTILWV,/3 TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE ] 15..3
UTILWV/30IGESTER RENOVATION 2'~.0
EQgBW%"~'0 ',NASTE:NATE,R TREATMENT SOLIDS ,MANAGEMENT 5,0.0
UTILW'tN3 SCAOA SYSTEM AND CONTROLS 150.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
EQ98WW'0 EMERGENCY POWER SUPPLY (CONSENT ORDER) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
UTIL'NW3 AUTOMATIC POVVER SWITCH GEAR 50.0 50.0 EQ.0 50.0
UTILW'/V4 VEHICLE PURCHASE
UTILWVFJ METHANE BOILER
FOgQW'~'0 tlEADWQRKS MFCHANICAi. BAR SCREEN
UTIL'¢VW2 8UBBLE TTPE DIFFUSERS'IN THE AERAT[ON BASIN
l .
SUB-TOTAL I 0.0 I 25.3.~ 55.0 140.0 140.0 1 40.0 ~ 75.0
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 81 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program "' --
crr'f CF BREMERTCN cAPrr,.Ij= [MPRCVEMENT PRCGRAM
1891 - ZOO3 PRCGRAM
SUMMARY - WASTEWATeR
":~fCR ! ~.c.c.~l 'gggl ~CCCI ~'C(31
[G,"IA,NC 'CTAL "'2~0.0 , 4C.57 2; ' ];~,C: ! .;,C5 3: ' 473 '3
[CIF:EqENC5 SCL. RCES LESS ',JSES ~.3: ::: '3 3 ! 3:: ~ 2 ,3..3 '
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 82 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program ~" --
CITY CF BREMF.~TCN GAMTAL IMPRCIVEMENT
19~1 - :003 PROGRAM
SUMMARY - STORM WATE:~
=~ICR ,'S,¢--81 :SSSI _"'COOl ,,"'t:~l ,"",C2:
iSCURCF. S CF ;UNOS
C--~neral Governmenbtt 0.0 0.3 9.3 0.~n 0 0 3,3
G,~nls - CSBG O '3 J.C 3.g 3 O 30 3.3
Granl,~ - C(her 0.9 4~0.C 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0
VVate. r ~ '3.'3 O.Z, 2~.3~ OO 0.0 'J,3 0
Waste,~aler t 0.,3 0.3 ~ 0 J 9.2, 33 O 2
S{crmw'~(er ,~.3 7C3 ZC0,O ~0 5C 9 ,~0 50
G.O. -~ands - Vcce~ i 9 O 0G 0.0 00 3 3 O .3
G.C. 5onds: Noc,-Vo{ea · ,3..3 0.C 0.0 3.0 0.,3 3.3 33
Revenue Bonds. 0.0 0 0 O.O 0.0 03 0 ~ 0
Anenat Street 101 0.3 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.3 C 0
Real Es~,ce ='.xczse Tax IGg 0.0 0,g O0 00 0.,3 O 0 0
Parl~ Cap(Col Fac:J~'y 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0
P~ndergast Pa~x 368 0,0 0.0 C.0 0.O 0.0 0.3 0.0
Goicl Mtn Golf Course 4~37 0.0 0..3 O.0 0.0 0.3 .3.0 03
EauIe. Ren{al Reserve 510 O.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.,3 0.0 0 O
Roosevett CaCdal As-s. et 5-''~ 0.,3 0.0 0fJ 0.0 00 O.C 0 0
TIa(UATA) 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0
FAUS (3.0 0.9 0.0 (].0 0.0 0.0
WSCOT 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.,3 00 0.0 0.0
ISTEA, 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.O 00
CountT/S{a~e/F_-ci (ECA) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.,3 0.0 0
Navy 0.g 0.3 0.0 0.0. 0 0 0.0 0.0
Street Vacation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other O.O 0.O 0.0 O.0 O.S 0.0
,TOTAL SCURCES 46.0 ! 5CC.3 Z50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
INFP-t,~,ST~UCTURE PqOJECTS
ISTORM(32 EAGLE AVENUE STORM ORAlNAGS_ , 10,0 90.0
ISTCRM03 STORM DRAINAGE MAJN RE,=_~CEMENT r~RCGP. AM 50.0 50.0 80.0 50.0 5,3.0 80.0
/STORMO1 KEAN STaEET/RGGERS "r-=T 'T,~', ' A - 46.0
SUE--'TCTAL S ~ m,_ ~ cram GRAIN G .!6.0 5C0.0 150,0 60.0 50.0 60.0 6O.O
FACtLIT[ES PROJECTS
FA~GSW01 COVER FOR DEWATE.RiNG FAC:LZ~'Pr' 110.0
SUe-TOTAL 0.0 0 O 1100 O.g O.O 00
IGRA. NC TOTAL r -I-5.9 I 5CO.g 250.0 [ 5C.'3 50.0 509
IOIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES I 0.0 [ 0..3 O.0 j O.0 0.0 0 O C.O
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 83 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program
C."FY CF BREMERTCN C.,~,RTAL IMPRI3VEMIBI'T
IS~l - .~003 PRCGR,.AM
SUMMARY - TRAN-SPCRTA~CN
=~ICR !g,~I ~Sg, Sl :,"'COt Z3C: ZCCZ! ZCC~
SCL/RC~S C~ =UNCS
Gener31 Governmental ,3.0 3 '3 03 3.,3 ~0 0.3
Gants - CCBG 30 7.,3 :7 S `3 3 : .3 3 3
Gants · CW. er S.3 3.0 3.3 0.,3 30 ,3.0
W~cer 0.3,, ,33 "'~ 00 ' .' ,'~ ."
Was~ew'aler :3 33 0 0 3 9 3 3 '3,2
S~cm'r.~er 0.'3 :,,15 ~ 3 ~,3 ,3 '3 33 ~
G.3.9cncs - Vc~ec 00 3.9 '3;3 3 C 3 g 3 3 r 3,3
G.O. 8oncis: Ncn-',/ctea 3.~ 3.g O 3 O.C O.0 O0 i
, ~e',ence 9oncs. O.0 i ,30 '3.'3 '3.0 3.0 023 3.'3
At, enal SIreet ',01 -,=.0 5555 42'3.5 Z130 1F::x3.O ~5,3.0 ~50 3
~eat Estate -~xc;se Tax JOg ,3.3 ,30 O.0 C.,D .2.0 D O
Ps,'xs CamtEl Fac:iib' 112 0.0 3.0 0.0 g.0 ,,3.0 0.0 ~.,3
Penciergast Parx 3C,B 0.O o.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
G¢~d ,Mtn Goit' Course '-07 0.O 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.O G.O
E.Iu~D. ,~eniat ~ese,,'ve 5tO O.O 0.',.1 ,0.0 O.O O.g O.O ,3.0
,Rccseveft Cr, Cltal Asse( 5~' 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.O 0.0
TI8 16.C) 5,573.2 3..-~0.9 ~,754.0 360.-t 0.0
FAUS 0.0 0.0 0.O 54.0 176.0 0.O 0.0
WSOCT 0.0 670.5 250.5 202.3 ,~ 5 0.0
ISTEA. 4~..3 3,977,.4 2.363.0 1,518.5 332.5 0.0 ,3.0
Counb//S(ate~F.,yj 0.0 287.5 303.0 80.3 16.4 0.O 00
Navy O.0 0.0, 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 O.O
Stree~ Vacaticn 0.0 0.g j 0.O 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0
OIher 0.O 110.0 377.c~ ~.0 275..3 O.O O.O
LTCTAL SOURCES r 57.0 ~ 1.315.5 I 72185 3,972.2 1.~62.,3 ~50.01 IEC.O
INF.:~ASTRUCTURE P.~CJECTS
T~ANS3 WEST HILLS CCMME,RC;AUWE:~NE?, CCRPJDCR 10(~.,3 I 1,80.~5.5
TP, ANS 1 MISCELLANECUS 150.0 150.0 I 5C,.O 150.0 150.0 1
T~,ANS8 SP,,203 COR,RICOR - MA~CR ENVESTME,~,~T STUOY 150.0
TaANS6 KJTSAP WAY RECONSTRUCT -WESL3N TO AUTO 57.3
T,~ANS7 S~.31SR304 BREMERTCN FF~RY TE~,',4[NAL TO GCRST 9,5.59.0 4.8-~3.0 3,7~8.2 788.,3
-"'~'INgSAS01 BURWELL HILL CLIME ~ 7.0 43.0
TaANS5 WA,RREN AVENUE SOUTHE].OUNO OF;RAMP TO CALLAHAN 54..0 176.0
IN9BA.S01 AUTO CENTE,R WY, B,RUEN AVE TO SP, 3 S8 CN RAMP 30.0 250.0
SUB-TOTAL ~79 11.31,-3~ 7.218.~ ~972.2 1,262.0 150,0 15,O.0
GRANO TOTAL 57..3~1.316.5 7.218.5 ~ 3972.2 3520 j 1if0.0 15.3 0
~OIFFE.RENCES SOURCES LESS USES 0.C [ 0.:3 0 O I 0.9 0.0 I '3 O 0.3
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 84 1998-09-08
G~ ~enul 0,O 0.O O,O 0.0 0.0 O.O 0.O
Gmes- COSG ~.~ 27. S O.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 O.0
a~la - C~.ef 0.0 ~.0 0.0 0.0 ~.0 O.O 3.0
Wal~ O.O ~.g 0.0 O.O 0,3 0 ~ ~.0
W~s~t~ 0 3 O.O O.O a g , 'J ,3 O.g
S;~ter O.,J ~ '~ ~ ,~ O.O ] 03 3.C 3 j
G.3. B~cs -Vo~ 3.,3 O.O O.C 5.~.0 ~ 0.3 0.3
G.O. 8enos: N~V~ 0.3 a.O 3.C ~OO ~.~C.O 0 O 3,3
.~en~ ~oncs. O.O 0.0 ,3.g 250.0 ~..3 5~.0 O 0
Arterial S~ %01 3 '3 3.C O.O O.O 0.O 0.,3 0 3
~e;i Estate 5c~ ~ 10g 71.3 t~4 0 g O.0 120.0 0.,3 3 3
Pa~Ca~iFac;l~ ~12 3.,3 317.5 1C~.5 ~2.3 71.9 1~.9 ~.3
~gas~ ~3~ ~8 30 00 0.O O.g , O.O 0.0 0.g
Go~ ~n God Cour~ ~7 :~.O 0.3 0.g O.0 O.O 0O
Ecui~. Ran[ai Re~e 5~0 0.3 O.O ~ O 0 00 0.3 O.O
R~ve~ Cacti Asset 5~ 0.0 285.0 ~ 125.,3 125.0 i~.0 ~.0 ~75.0
T;8(UATA) 0.0 O.O 0.O 0.O O.O O.O
FAUS O.g g.O O.O 0.0 O.O 0.0 0.0
WSCOT O.g O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.O
IST~. 0.0 0.0 0.O O.O 0.0 0.O O.0
CcunWiS~twF~ O.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0
,qa~ '3.0 O.0 0.O 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0
S~t Va~ucn O.0 0.O 0.0 O.O O.0 0.0 O.O
Other 0.0 0.O 2.~.0 0.0 0.0 ~ ,~.0 0.0
{TOTAL SOLACES J 254 4j 1.? !3.5i 2.425.5 5.5~7.3 2,~g1.~ j ~.9~0.9 J ~1.~ j
~AC;LITtES
PA~ FURCHASE & CEVELCP HA~OCN SCHOOL SITE 2~.4 1~.4
FAggPK~2 LIONS FIELD - RESTRCCM UPGRACE 5.0
F~gTC~Gg P~CNIC TABLES & ~AR~ BENCHES RE~CEMENT 5.0 5.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
FA~GP~7 SHERIDAN ~A~K IMPROVEMENTS
FAgTOF~ 8ALL FFELD IMPROVEMENTS 10,0 5.0 5,0 7.5 . I0.0
PARK17 IR~I~TIQN PROJECTS 10.0 7.5 7.5 10.0 15.0
FAGgP~ SR~RUEN TENNIS COURT IMPROVEMENT 10.0
FA99PK41 ~TSAP ~ ~STER P~N 10.0
FA98PK~ JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER - LOCKS~ ROOM IMP. 10.0 '
FA~OF03 VARIOUS NECESSARY ADA IMPROVEMENTS 1 ~.4
FA98PKg7 UCNS RA~K-DOCK REPAIR 15.0
FA~PK09 PAT CAREY VISTA - SHORELINE REHABILITATION
FA97OF10 UNIDENTiFiED &EMERGENCY PROJECTS ~.0 24.5 20.3 20.4 24.3 ~.3
FAGGP~ ~NE~E F~ELD IMPROVEMENTS (UGHTS} 50.0
FASGFK~ PENOE~GAST IMPROVEMENT 71.5
PARK1 EVERGREEN PARK 565.0 2,2CG,O
FA~PK02 F~RK SIGNS 2.5 2.5 38
FA97OF07 ~YGRCU'NO EQUIP. REPAIR & REP~CEMENT 5.0 ~.O ~.~ ~OO
FAgGPK01 FENCZNG R~{~CEMENT 5.0 5.0 7.5 10.0
FA~7GFll SHE,RIDAN RECR~TION CTR - ELECT. UPGD 15.~
FAS7OF23 ~,~NE~E - 0EVELOP. - P~YFIELO ~EHABIUTATICN 125.0
FA~7GFO7 GLEN JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER - FALSE CEILING 10.0
FA97OF~ WARREN AVENUE P~YFIELD 125.0
FAggPKC~ PENDERGAST REG. PARK - ~NO PURCHASE 250.0
PAR~ BLUEBERRY PARK- DEVELOPMENT 6C0.0
FA~8FK02 PARKS & RECREATION COMMUNITF CENTER 5,~.0
FAggPK~ GLEN JARSTAD AQ. CTR. BULKHEAD REPAIR 5.0
FA97OF29 ~EHAB TENNIS COURTS 10.0 110 13.0
FA97OF24 NAG PARK - 0EMOLISH HOUSE, CREATE PICNIC AR~ 1~.0
FA~gP~8 HADDON SITE - CONSTRUCTION PHASE 3 120.0
PARK~ J N.A.D. ~RTNE PARK - DEVELOPMENT 3~.0 3~.0
FAg7OF25 PENDERGAST REGIONAL PARK - LIGHTS ~.0
FAg7OF31 PENCEROAST REG. PARK FIELDS 4,5, & 5 CONST, 1,3~.0
FAggP~O HAOOON SITE - CONSTRUCT RESTROOM ~.0
FAgBOF02 PENDERGAST PARK PHASE III - RV CAMPGROUND 5~.0
D~FT Cap~al Facilities Element 85 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program ,~--
Ch, C)F BREMEXI'~N ¢AimfrJU,, IMI~OVEMENT pimps,
SUMMARY -
'F.x.g7CFI 7]K;TSAP '_~,KE. ;AR)K - ;~ASE :11 DES;ON J
FASgPKI2 )SENIOR C:TiZENS CENTER - ~EF'..ACE CARPETrNG
FASgP'K:O IK2CVANI5 =~.~K · tIEHAS 'qASE=~,LL & SCCCE.R F:EL2S 'C'l
FASgPKCg rYe(SAP L.-~KE =A,qK · ~E~=AiRS 70 -'CAT LAUNCH :2 3
FA,gTCFZI ~!.:CNS FiEL3 - PArtK;NG .CT F~E.NCVAT:CN
F~gTCF-,'~-IL:CNS F;EL..3 - SHELTER
FASSPKC~ IW 5REEN CEMETERY - PLOT LC~VER SECTION
FA.qSFKt T SHERICAN ~,E.:REAT[CN CTR. POi~'ERY STUC[C3
FA_cSF~K:3 i~r GREE~ CEMETERY - AUTCtvLATE :RRIGATICN
PA~PKI4 L;CNS PARK - ~E?LACF_ THE -~CAT DOCK
FAgSPKI5 CDNSTRL'CT BMX FACtLIlY
FA_qSPK18 'iVY GREEN C~METERY - RELOCATE BUILDINGS
FAggPKI9 FOREST RICGE ~ARK - REHAcl SCCLJT HALL
FASSPK21 F-JTSAP LAKE P~RK - ACUATIC WEED ,',,{ASTER PLAN
FAgSP~ ,L'.CNS PARK - NEVV RESTROOM & OTH, AMMENITIES
FAEiSPK.2"3 17'FH & )RONS~DE - DEVELOP PRCPE.~TY FOR PARK
FASgPK24 PAT CAREY VISTA - PARKING PRC~ECT
FASSPK,2i EATAAN PARK - SHELTER
FAS'~PK.25 F,._.REST RIDGE PARK - RENOVATE PARK AREAS
FAggPK27 SHERIDAN RECREATION CTR -AIR C.,~NDiT{CN OFFICES
FASgPK29 iVY G~EE,"4 CEMETERY - CEMETERY E.XPANS',ON
FAggPK20 L:CNS PARK - UPGRACE BALL FIELD LIGHTrNG
FASSPK31 iVY GREEN CEMETE.RY - CONSTRUCT ~.A/N CRYPT
FASSPK22 (VY GREEN CEMETERY - CONSTRUCT .%,tAL,'SOLEUM
FAggPKD,3 'TEEN CENTER
FASgP."W34 iYCUTH ATHLETIC FIELDS
EQU)PMENT & VEHICLES
ECggCF01 MOWER & TP,,AILER ..~.0
E,,199PKCt SiGN MAKER
EQc. gF:XOI CON~p,jTS,=. HAROWARS~SOFi",A/ARE PROGRAM 3.0 3.C 4.0
EQ~PK07 SENIOR C',T[Z-2,~tS CENTER - RE,=L. PCCL TABL-2 10.0
~99,:K02 E:UIPMENT ~EPLACE,MENT 2.5 2.5
~..,g/uFC6 -2, E,klICR C~TLT_ENS CENTER - ~EP_. MiSC. EQUIP
EQSgPKC-4 GLEN JAASTAO AQ. CTR. - iNS. PCOL BLANKET REPAIR 7.5 ,
EQg7GF03 PArtKS & RECRE.ATICN COPY MACHINE 15..3
EQSgPKO.3 PURCHASE OF TURF T.E,~RA .k4ACHINE 9C
IO.C
F ,GLE T , AQ. CTR - C~EM DISINFECT. SYS
EG97GFCEiGLEN JARSTAD AQ. CTR - DE~UM. SYS. REPA~RYUPGG.
EGgSPKCE{GLEN JARSTAG AG. CTR. FILTER SYS. RE;R. & UPGG.
ECggpKC6iGLEN JARSTAO AG. CTR. POOL LINER REPLACEMENT
EG99PK0~ SHERIDAN RECRFATICN CTR. SEC',J'RIIY SYSTEM i
SUB-TOTAL 0e 58.0 32.0 120 5.5 g ~ 21.0
(GRAND TOTAL 2¢_4.4 1.113.5 I 2.425.5 6,517.3 2.491 .g 1.g80.9 331.8
[DIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES I ' 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0O O0 [ 0.0
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element ~)6 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program"" --
C,"FY CF 8,qEMERT~N C,1,PfT.,tL. iMP!qQVEME.NT
SLIMMARY - GCI..~
SOURCES CI= =UNCS
G~nts - CZSG 'O.O g,C
Gc4rrt..s - Other 3.3 Qn 0.0
Water 3.3 0.0
',Naslewater , G.C 0.,3
S[cm'rw~ter 0.'2 O 3 30
G.O. ~anGs - Vale<n 0.,~ 0.,3 0.3 0 0 0.,] 3,3 O C
G.C. 9ancs: Nan-Va(ec~ 3.3 ,3.,5
.Revenue =.onc~'~. O.O 250.C .~.,.:c,,~.O
Atlenat Slteet 101 O,rJ 0,0
Real Es,'ace E~c:se T~x lu"'S 0.0 0,O 0.0
Parks Cat~ttm Fac:lity. 112 0.0 0.0
Penciergasl Pan< 308 O.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0
O-alcl Mtn Gat' Course 407 70.0 168,4 445.0 175 0 875.0 175.0 475.0
Equio. Rental Reserve 510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.O 0,0
,Rcx~.everl Cac:nt;~l Asse{ ~"'2_ 0.,3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.,3 0.C} 0.0
TIB(UATA) 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0
FAUS O.O O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
WSOOT 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
tSTEA. O.0 O.0 0.0 0.O 0.0 0,O 0.0
Caunty/Stale, Fsd 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.O
Navy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sb'eet Vacstjcn O.O O.0 0.0 0.0 ' 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 0 O 0.0 g 3 0,0 0.0 0.0 , rJ0
TOTAL SOURCES I 70.0 ~ 416.4i
FAC;LITIES ?ROJECTS
FAS~GM01 UNIOENT[FIED& EMERGENCY 41.4 25.0 25.0 5O.0f 50.0 50.0
FAgTOF15 ,NEW CLUB HOUSE 250.0 3,CCO.C
FA99GMO4 REBUILD ;8 GREEN CN CLY. COURSE & #2 TEE
FA.99GMC2 ,M~INTENANCE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 25,3 25,0
FA_-IgG,MO3 ENCRCACHMENT- MCCORMICK LAND 250.C
FA_cgGMO5 INSTALL NE'¢/IRRIGATION SYS CN CASCADE COURSE 7CO.O
~FA..~BQFCA AMPH. THEATER 3C_.XS,C
FAS'gGMC6 WATER RE-USE PROGRAM
SUB-TCTAL 0.0 2~1 .~ 3.32g.0 50.0 750 O 53.C 350.~
EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES
· 2 . 125.0 25.0
SUB-TOTAL I .'3 125,2 2.0 1.:5.,~ 125.0 25.C
[GRANO TOTAL 0.01 418.4}
[CiF,=ERENCES SOURCES LESS USES 70 0~ O.al 0.01
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 87 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program ~ ,....,
CF/"f CF BREMERTCN CAJ~AL IMi~3VIgiL'~ N~.,GRAM
19gl - Z003 PRCG~M
SUMMARY - ENGagiNG
Fscu~c~s cF =u~cs
G~nts - Ctner :.C :.~ 2.0 : 4 ~ ~.J 2 2
'A'at~ 3.3 :.3 12 0.0 ~.2 3~
Wasc~ter 0 ~ : 3 3..~ ~ ~ 0.G 3 ~ 2 ~ '
Rev~ue ~oncs. 0..D 0.,3 C.G 0.0 GO 0.~
A~enal S~t 101 2-; ~ 3 ~.O 2.0 ~.0 ~..~
~eal Estate ~c~ T~ TCg G.3 ].3 03 0.0 O0 0.0 0
Fa~s Cac~al F/c~i~ 112 0.3 O.0 0.O O.g 0.O 0.O 0.3
P~rga~ P3~ ~8 0.,3 O.O 0.0 0.0 0,0 O.O 0..3
Gceo ~n Golf C~ ~7 0.,3 0.9 3.0 O.O 0.O O,O 0.3
5cuzo. Renal Re~pe 510 0.O 0.O O.O 0.0 0.0 0.O
~ve~ Cap~al A~t 5~ 0,0 0.O 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
T~8~UATA) O.O 0,~ C,0 0.0 0.3 O 0
FAU5 0.,3 3.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 O.0
WSCC:T 0.9 3.0 O.0 O.0 0.0 0.0
IST~A. 0.0 0.O 0.0 O.0 0.0 O.O C
Ccun~/Stat~F~ 0,0 0.,3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Na~ 0.; O.O ~.3 0.O O.O 0:3
S~,t Vs~dcn 0.0 0,0 0.0 O.0 0.O 0.O
C~er 0.O 0.0 .3.0 O.0 0,O 0.0
T3T,~L SCL~CES I O.'D :D.O 00 180 O.Q ~ ~..3
EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES
EC98AS0 RA;AR SPEED NOT[FICATiON TRAJLE~ 18.0
SUB-TOTAL O.O 0.O O 0 1~.0 O.O 0.0
iG~ANO TOT;L I O,O ~ '~.0 O,0 :5.,D O.C .~.0
[OFF=E~ENCES SCURCES LESS USES i 0.3 t 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 '3.0 ( 023
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 88 1998-09-08
SUMMARY - GF_NE~q.a4, FIrNO
SOURCES :~ :UN~S
~ G~vemmental I ~0.0 119.~ ~.2 3~.7
S3. ~oncs -vcc~ 3.3 3 ~ g.3 g.~
~ev~ue ~cncs. 'D.O ~..] ~ 3 O.g O.0
~e~i S~t ',01 ~.g 3'3 C ] 0:3 0.0
~eal Es{ate ~c:~ 7~ 'Cg O.S g] C 3 a.0
:s~s Cac~ai :sc'.~ ', '.2 D.3 :~ 2 g.O 0.0 C.:3
:enaergsst =s~ 3~ 0:3 : 2 O.O O.O 0.0 3.0 3.3
~ M~ Gel/3au~ ~7 O.O 3.3 O 0 O.O O,O
~:u~O. ,qen{al ~ ese~,e ~ ~ O O.0 30 O.0 0.0
T;B(UATA) O.O 0.3 O.g 0.0 O.O 0.O 0.0
~US 0.3 g.'3 O.O O.0 0.O 0.0 0.O
'NSOCT O.O 0.O g.9 O.0 0.0 O.O O.O
'.STB. g.O 0.'3 C O i 0.0 0.0
C~nct~StateF~ O.0 0.,3 O.O ~ 0.O O.O O.O 0.0
Na~ 0.0 3.0 3.0~ 0.0 0.0 0O 0.0
~ St'~t Vacs~cn 0.0 O.O O.0 j 0.O 0.O 0.0 O.0
I C:ber 0O ,~ ,~ '3 C ~ 9.0 O.O
~'CT;LSCL~CSS I ~5 I~.3 333.7 i 3S80 t ~7~ 27~.~
FAC',LIT:ES PROJECTS
FF~SSF~ iFS.~CE~GAST L~S~ ~AYMENT 15.2 ',~.2 18.2 ' 18.2 152 I~.2
~FASZGF~Z~FAC;LITrES P~,N 3~.0 35.0 12.5 15.0 8.0
'F~TGF01 ~A;~ SSNC/T',CNING FOR FIRB STAT[ONS 2 & 3 12.0
F~97GF~IGL~N jA~STAO AC. CT~. - ~GCF REPAIR ~.0
FAg7GF!4~F.~INT F~RE STATIONS 2 & 3 7.5
FA97GFC6 ~:ARSTAO AQ. CTR. - FACILI~( UPGRAGE 15.0
F~99PKG7 S~NICR CENTER - VTNYL SIDING 10.0
FASTOFt0 SENIOR C;T:SN CTR - ROOF aE,=AiR ~.0
FA~PK~ ~TSAP ~ .=A~K - RE~AJRS TO RESIDENCE 20.0
F~PKO3 iSHE,RICA,~ ~SCRE~TtCN CTR -WINDOW REPLACEMENT
SUB-TCT;L O.O ~ ~.2 ~2.2 , 103.2 57 2 51.2 ~.2
EQUIPMEh~ & VEHICLES
'DENSAT5 =C3MPUTERS i ~.5 ~C.3 ~ '
E.299GF,31iSHCP ~CHINERY & EQUIPMENT - TRANSRCRTAT~CN
;~9cGF02;UNICENT~FiE.2' SAP TAL - F=RE
~FCL',CE! ',~TROLVENCLE~E~CEMENTSCHEDULE S8.~ I~5.3 125.0 125.0 I~.0 1~.0
FSF~E3 ICSVELC[ ~ ~M~L~MS~ ~,ERSS~CY C~Sa. CTR. 10.C
PS;i E ~ERG~NC'f GENERATORS - Fi~E ETA 2 & 3 17.0
E~gTGF01 SURVEY EQUIP. PURCHASES - ENGINEERING DIV.
E;98GF03 SSMPUTE~ TECHNOLOGY UPG~ADES ~.O ~.0 750 ~.0 ~.0
PCUCE ~ ~MCSILE DATA TE~,MINALS 36.8 ~.8 ~ 5 42.7
PSFiRE~ ~AOlO EQUIPMENT UPDATE ~ 5~.0
PSFIRE21 ~L:FE-PAX CARDIAC MONITQR/QEFiBRI~TOR ~ 12.0 12.0
E'S98GF0~ ~C AEN ~ OF SC~A BREATHING APPARATUS ~.0
E~S8GF02{~EP~CSMENT OF FIRE HCSE 10.0
SUB-TOT;L 3~ 5 I ~.5 ~S~ 5 252.8 ~.5 2155 ~9.7
[GRAND TOF.~L ~ 344.5 145.0 i 333.7 t 350.0 j 347.0
[C~FFa~E,CSS SOURCES L~SS USSS I 0.0 0.O ( 00 I 0.0 I 0.0
D~FT Cap~al Facil~es Element 89 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program--- ,_
C,'TY CF I~REMERTCN CAPITAL IMiaRCV~.MFJ, Fr
1991 - ~.003 ;RCGRAM
SUMMARY - OTHER r'tJNl:)S
rSCURC~S :F =UNCS
' Gml C,~vemmefi~l * ~ 3.0 '3.0 ,1.0 3.C '3.3
G~n~m - C38G 253 7',.3 ~.3 ~ 2 ~3 ~ 3
G,~n/s - Other 3.3 0O 3.'3 0 O J0 ' '; ; 3
] Wast~Cer '2; 3.0 ;.'3 O,g 0'2 '~. 3
~ S~c~er : 2 ,3,3 3.3 ,3.0 3.,3 '3.2
G Q 5onds - Vo{~ :E~.~ 25..3 O.O 0.0 0.0 3.O
~evenue 5ones. ~ .3,3 C 3 3.,3 :O.':~O O ,3 : '2 t 32
Anenat S~r~t :O1 3.3 3 3 32 3.2 3.C 3.3
R~I Es~ce ~c:s~ T~ 1~9 9 ~ g7 3 50.3 !.:~C.'3 ~0 5~ 3
Fs~s Caa~sl Fac::~ I 12 :.3 3.0 3.g O.O '3.0 g.g ,3.0
F~rgas~ PDrX ~8 O.g 0.0 O.O O.O g.g ,3.g
Gc~ ~n Golf CJu~ ~7 O.g O.0 0.O O.O 0.0 0.O ,3.0
E~u,o. Rental Rese~e 510 0.3 2S2. t 37:.2 ~.5 3747 3;0 57.2
R~ve~ CaG~al A~{ 6~ g.C 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.O O.0
7:~(UATA) 03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 00
.:AUS 0.0 0.0 O.O 0.3 O.0 0.9
WS~GT O.O 0.C 30 0.0 0.O ;3 O
IST~A. 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.O 0.0
Ccun~/SmteF~ 3.3 0.O O.C 0.0 0.0 ,3.0
Na~ O,g O.O 0.0 0.0 O.O 3.0 0.0
~ Clher 3.0 O.O g,O g.O O.O O.O
[TOTAL SOURCES 325 5 ~.~ ~572 14:385 ~ ~9.7 ~g0 I
INF~STRUCTURE PROJECTS
IN~GF0 J
;ACA CURB CUT PROGRAM 12.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
JlNSTCF0 CONTINGENCY FOR UNIC. [NFRAST~UCT. PRCjECTS 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 ~.0
JlNgTCF0 TRAFFIC CALMING & SAFE~ DEVICES 25.0 51.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 2~.0 25.,3
37 D 121.0 95 0 I 0.CgE.0 DE.0 ~.0 ~.g
FAC:LITIES PROJECTS
PSFiRE1 F;AE DRILL TC'~VER 289,5 253
FASSCF0 FAILURE ANALYS;S C.O. ~3 - EVERGREEN 47,3
FA~OF0 NE'N C;~ HALL 2,5C0,0
EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES
ECUIFRE AE~L. OF VEHICLES & ~QUIPMENT IN ERR 252.1 ~72.2 54.5 374.7 3~.0 57.2
C L .3 0 252.1 872.2 374.7 3~.0 57
SUB-T TA 5~3.5
[GRANO TCTAL j 3255 $ ~.4 [ 9672 14.128.5 ~9.7 439,0 )
{C~F;E.RENCSS SOURCES LESS USES i O0 ~ 00 ~ 0.O 0 0 00 0,0 I C.O
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 90 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance Program ""'
~ ~ ~ ~ cct c'
> ~ ~8 ~ c c c c,c c c ~ ~ c
C[
--.
O~
=m
~ D C~O D~ ~ · C
~ ~ ~ z~w ~ zl~ z~O z~ ~ z
D~PT Cap~al Pacil~es Elemen~ ~1 1998-09-08
Six-Year Finance ProBran "
C~pit=~ Projects ~nd Financing Phn
7abi¢ SC-[ .: presc.".ts 3reme~en Schccl's s:x-v~ pi~u :~r c:c~:l ~mcrcv~::cnc 2reject. ~c[u~n~ sc~ccs
c(;uCi~c mcncv ',v:dmn d:c prcjc::d 5~dm~ c:p:c:L:cs :~:~ :cas:.:_:: ~:¢ ;robsOlo 5 dtng 'E ~' .7,. ,...
::c~L:i :mprcvsmcm ;rcjcc',s
:a ', ~9 :. :h~ vc[er~ o[' :he Bremenon School 2~s{r~c: :ud:or~zed: ~ Z 7 mzZHcn bond ~ssu¢. T:n:~ ;rc~:m ~s
no~ :3mg[c~c The D~s~:c: dc¢s ncc ~csc~::c :ecucq'.na ~dd'
' . - :::cn:[ vct:: auLhenzzUCn ~c:bre [9~S. The
D~s~nc: uses: c',[~:cns :cv~¢,.v cc~,icLcc Lo [dcnc~%' ~hc~-e c:p~L:[ ;rcfec~ Ear rcccm. mcnd:cicn
T~bie SC-13. Bremer[on School Dis~ric~ C~pi~l ~ro]ec:s lad Financing ~l~n (SOO0)
Cos~'Revenue 1997 I998 1999
2000 200l 2002 Total
Non-Caoacitv Proiect
'~ .A~iais~aticn guiiding } [,350 t 1,350
2. Mzmteaa~ce & 1,200
Transpc~aUen Building 1,200
(Replacemeat)
: gremeaca J~ior High i5,000 15,0OO
GEeplacement)
~. Ol>~pic View EZemeac=~,'
(Rcpiacement) 8 .'3'C'O 8,000
Total Cost 1,350 24,200 25,550 '
Local F~ds' 1,350 1,350
L~csl Send ?~ds ~4 ~n3
..... 24,200
S~:tc Match
. ~:s~c; Fees 20. 20. 20. 20. 20 80.
Total Revenues 1,3~0 20. 24,220 20. 20 20. 25,630
t Balance 20. 20. 20. 20 20.
~ 20. 80.
'Loca[ Fund~ include zevenue from proper~ lezses ~d surFi~ pmpe~.
Sourc:: 3cemeaon School Distree: '
The ~str~c: am:c:petes only limited c[igibilit,:' for State matching f~qds. The actual receipt of state matching
(,~ds ;s dtf~cuEc :o prodie: because ogstate fmqding shcr:[aHs. hnpac: Fee revenue gorecasts ~-c consis~cm
'.fi~ Fast income 9ore ne..v res{dcntial development (the District has 52,888 in its Impact fee accost at the
bcgiFcmg oF i997).
DRAFT Capital Facilities Element 92 1998-09-08