The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4606 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE adopting 1997 amendments to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan. WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton adopted its revised Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance No. 4545 in February 1996; and WHEREAS, requested and proposed amendments to the Plan were docketed in accordance with an adopted procedure for amending the Plan once per year, were processed through the Planning Commission public hearings in May and June, and were submitted for a mandatory 60-day review by state agencies on June 11, 1996; and WHEREAS, the Bremerton Pla.truing Commission, following its public study sessions and hearings during May and June 1996, recommended City Council adoption of the proposed amendments, as presented, subject to any adjustments that may be necessary as a result of public testimony and comments from state agencies; and WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted public hearings on these proposed amendments on August 20 and 27, 1997 to accept additional public comments and to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and state agencies; now therefore THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN Section 1. The Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended in the West Hills neighborhood south of Roosevelt Avenue to change the designation from "Utility (U)" to "Medium Density Residential (MDR)", as shown in attached Exhibit "A", on a small portion of a City reservoir site that has been surplussed and may be sold for residential development. Section 2. The Comprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended on the east side of Wheaton Way, north of Dibb Street, to change the designation of two lots from "School (S)" to "General & Highway Commercial (C-G)", as shown in attached Exhibit "B". Section 3. The Comprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended in the vicinity of the Auto Center district to change the designation of four lots, consisting of about 22 acres, from "General and Professional Office (C-P)" to "Industrial Park (IP)", as shown in attached Exhibit "C". Section 4. The Comprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended to change the designation of two small lots, comprising about one-third acre total area and located on the south side of Broad Street from "General & Highway Commercial (C-G)" to "Medium Density Residential (MDR)", as shown on attached Exhibit "D". 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 1 Section 5. The text of the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to incorporated the annual update of the Capital Facilities Program portion of the Capital Facilities Element, as attached hereto as Exhibit "E". Section 6. The Comprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended to expand the "Parks (P)" designation north of Sheldon Boulevard and Thirteenth Street, south of Smith Cove, and to expand the "High' Density Residential (HDR)" designation to include two additional lots on the east side of Highland Avenue, as shown in attached Exhibit "F'. Section 7. The Land Use Plan maps contained within the Comprehensive Plan are hereby amended to eliminate the designation "Cemetery (C)" and change all areas currently designated "C" to "Low Density Residential (LDR)", as shown in attached Exhibit "G". Section 8. The text of the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to add descriptions of the land use designations used on Plan map, as contained in attached Exhibit "H". APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading this 27th day of August ,1997. PASSED by the Bremerton City Council this o?¢~, day of fi'~VID F'XRR, P~resident Bremerton City Council APPROVED this ,,.~t~ day of ~~' ~ _/4'AY ,1997. L~tNN HORTON, Mayor ATTEST: /~) / ~A~'~LEE]~ McCLUSKEY, City Clerk Published: ~_ ~ c~_ ~ -7 Effective: /O '- .~ 7' q 7 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 2 Exhibit "A" HARBOR HEIGHTS APARTMENTS --- Plan Amendment; This amendment changes the designation of the area shown below from "Utility (U)" to "Medium Density Residential (MDR)". All other portions of the site proposed for the Harbor Heights Apartments development are currently designated "MDR". This amendment brings the entire site under that designation and allows the surplus Utility land to become part of the development. Map Amendment: Area to be amended from "U" (Utility) to "MDR" (Medium Density Residential) (~) Area recently annexed to the Ci~. Designated "MDR". (MUlti-family/.2"~/'Residential) 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 3 Exhibit "B" BREMERTON SCHOOL DISTRICT --- Plan Amendment: This Plan Map amendment will allow the School District to sell two lots of surplus property for commercial development. The lots front on Wheaton Way and are adjacent to other commercial properties to the north and south. The Plan designations of the two lots are changed from "School (S)" to "General & Highway Commercial (C-G)". C-G MDR C-.P' Change the Plan designation on the subject property from "S" to "C-G". LDR- l-DR MU U mR 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 4 Exhibit ~C~ AUTO CENTER AREA INDUSTRIAL --- Plan Amendment; This amendment applies to four lots (about 22 acres) located on the hillside above and to the west of the Auto Center district. The property is currently planned and zoned for office development. The amendment will change the designations of these lots from "General & Professional Offices (C-P)" to "Industrial Park (IP)". HI IP. The Plan designation of the shaded area is changed from "C-P" to "IP" r Rd. P C-G ! 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 5 Exhibit "D" BROAD STREET RESIDENTIAL --- Plan Amendment: This amendment changes the designation of two small lots from "General & Highway Commercial (C-G)" to "Medium Density Residential (MI)R)". The lots are too small and too far removed from Wheaton Way to be suitable for commercial development. With the recent development of Broadmore Village, the west end of Broad Street has become a viable residential neighborhood. This change is consistent with that trend. MDR E. Broad Street C-G LDR 1997 Plan Amend. ord. --- Page 6 Exhibit "E' CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT AMENDMENTS; Bremerton Comprehensive Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Part 2 of 2: Capital Facilities Program Prepared by: BREMERTON PLANNING Adopled: April 5, 1995 Revised: October 23, 1996 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. -- Page 7 Exhibit "F' SOUTH SMITH COVE --- Plan Amendment: 1. This amendment changes the designation of lands along the north side of Sheldon Boulevard and Thirteenth Street from "Mixed Use/PUD (MU)" to "Parks (P)". This will achieve consistency with the master plan for the expansion of Evergreen Park and prevent commercial or industrial development from disturbing documented soil contamination areas immediately south of Smith Cove and north of Sheldon/Thirteenth. 2. The Plan designations on two lots on the east side of Highland Avenue are changed from "Mixed Use/PUD (MU)" to "High Density Residential (HDR)". NC Neighbmhood Convenience ~N ' LDR Low Density Residenlial J~--~, ~J-//~x 'L/~~HI~R~ ~ McdiumDensityRcsidcntitl High Density Residential ~ PROPOSED __] ~ Current __ HDR~ 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 8 Exhibit REMOVAL OF "Cemetery" DESIGNATION --- Plan Amendment: This amendment eliminates the designation "Cemetery (C)" from all Comprehensive Plan maps to remove the potential for confusion and conflicts with zoning. This change affects only two areas o£the City, as shown below, and will have no effect on the ability o£an existing cemetery to expand in the future in accordance with the provisions o£ underlying zoning. The Plan designation of all areas currently designated "Cemetery (C)" are hereby changed to "Low Density Residential (LDR). l,ocation Maps: A: West Bremerton B: Central Bremerton Land Use Plan Land Use Plan 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 9 Exhibit Land Use Designations Land Use DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION LDR Low Density Residential: This designation includes existing and proposed residential neighborhoods at densities of $ dwellings per acre or less. It is applied to areas that don't have the levels of urban services needed for higher density development, or that have terrain, sensitive areas (wetlands, creeks or shorelines), poor access, or special amenities (views) .that are best protected through Iow density development. Large lots are allowed in LDR zones, especially in areas without sewer service. Developers are encouraged to cluster development on smaller lots in exchange for open space through the PUD process lo make the best possible use of the site. Four Primary Residential Zones are directly consistent with this Plan designation (SI:-I, SF-2, SF-3, and DR). The Limited Parking Overlay (LPO) and Parks & Schools (PS) zones are also consislent with all residential Plan designations. Small "secondary zones" may be approved within larger residential developments to serve local needs for convenience shopping, employment, education or recreation. MDR Medium Density Residential:' This designation is applied to Ihe older higher- density residential neighborhoods &Central Bremerton where lots are small and mixed development is common or desirable. Other areas may be designaled MDR when found to be suitable for the 8-18 units per. acre density level. Such areas are generally near transportation corridors and shopping/employment concentrations, and have adequate availability of urban services and facilities. MF and CBR are the primary zones in lhis designation. They allow virtually all types of residential developmenl, including single-unit homes and duplexes on small lois, multi-unit developments, townhouses, and boarding houses. Limited mixed uses are permitled in these zones to provide convenient services to neighborhoods without causing land use conflicts. llDR iligh Density Residential: This designation allows the City's highest densities (more than 18 units per a.cre) and is dire~:tly consistent with the "MR" zone which allows tip to 44 units per acre. HDR areas are intended primarily for locations along major transportation corridors, within and around the Central Business District and smaller business districts, and where such development cat] take advantage of unique views or such amenities as shorelines, recreational facilities, or access to ferries or buses. Utilities, services and transportation must be adeqt, ate to serve lIDR development. C-G General & Highway Commercial: This is the City's most intense commercial designation. It provides for lhe "GB (General Business)" a,~d "SC (Shopping Center)" zones, both of which are automobile oriented and designed for application along highways and major arterial streets having high traffic volumes, direct auto access, and maximum drive-by visibility. These locations are suitable for such "heavy commercial" uses as shopping centers, major grocery stores, auto services, auto repairs, motels, taverns, restaurants, adult entertainment, fast food, and large scale retailers that require very large structures'and expansive parking. Most types of businesses are permitted in these areas, along with office uses. Residential is permitted as a secondary use. 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 10 Land Use DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION C-P General & Professional Offices: This designation supports the "PO (Professional Office)" zone. It's applied in locations that arc uniquely suitable for office development, areas that have physical or Iocationai features that might be less suitable for higher intensity uses, or areas in which office development might provide a buffer or transition between two zones that might otherwise conflict. Office districts may consist of a mixture of offices'and support services such as copy and computer services, office machine repairs, or mail services. Light retail, such as a restaurant, book or stationery store, art supplies store, delicatessen, or newspaper/magazine shop are usually compatible with this district. CBD Central Business District: This is downtown Bremerton. This desigation supports a number of zone.s, including BE.(Business Core), GB (General Business), PO (Professional Office), and the medium and high density residential zones MF and MR. The URD (Urban Renewal Dislric0 is on the CBD waterfront. The CBD is intended to provide a tnix of uses lhat includes retail at the slrect level of Ihe primary pedeslrian slreels, with offices, apartments, sludio lofts, and other uses on the upper levels. The downtown zones allow the highest residential densities in Ihe City with the fewest development limitations. Residential zones (MF and MR) may be permilted on side streets at densities up to 44 units per acre where it can be demonstrated that pedestrian retail is less important tha.n close proximity of full time downtown residents. CBD development should be designed to encourage walking, shopping, browsing, and the use of public transit, bicycles and the ferry system to reduce the imports,ice of the private automobile in this compact downtown environment. NC Neighborhood Convenience: This designation supports the "NB (Neighborhood Business)" Zone and is intended to provide small scale convenience services and retail goods within small neighborhood service areas. This district is often centrally located within neighborhoods and should minimize vehicular traffic and encourage short-distance walking. It should not include businesses wilh regional markets Ihat bring traffic from other areas. Neighborhood Convenience centers often consist of small "Mom & Pop" markets and may also include such personal services as a barber/beauty salon, day care center, neighborhood or senior center, and olher activities Ihat might benefit the surrounding neighborhood. MU Mixed Use/PUD: TI'Ils designation'is intended for areas Ihat are in transition, usually from residential to commercial or industrial, or that arc in a transitional location, such as between a residential neighborhood and a commercial district.' The "MX (Mixed Usc)" zone is the primary zone and leans toward commercial development with residential allowed as a secondary use. In cases where the MX zone doesn't provide the needed flexibility, the MU Plan designation promotes mixed use developments through Ihe PUD process. Single purpose developmenls that don't require a PUD and can't be built within the paramete.rs of the MX zc~ne should not be designated MU. 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 11 Land Use DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION tli lleavy Industrial: This designation is applied to the City's least sensitive areas and areas most suitable for.large-scale industrial uses. It supports the "IG (Industrial General)" and "MX (Mixed Use with industrial emphasis)" zones. Such uses include manufacturing, warehousing, trucking operations, motor vehicle sales and service, large open display lots, and are often accompanied by extensive outdoor stoi'age of supplies, vehicles, heavy equipment, products, or other materials. Businesses that typically generate noise, dust, odors, operate at late or odd hours, or that otherwise might not be pleasant neighbors could expect to find a home in the HI district. This dislricl is placed as close as possible to major highways, freeways, airports and rail lines, and as far as possible from residential neighborhoods and other sensitive land uses. IP Industrial Park: This designation supports the "IP (Industrial Park)" and "MX (Mixed Use with light industrial emphasis)" zones. It is intended to provide areas for a mix of office, wholesale, trade and distribution, bulk retailing, and light manufacturing itl a Iow-density, campus-like environment. The dislrict should be designed to minimize adverse impacts on adjacent areas and to present an attractive well-landscaped appearance. Businesses located within an Industrial Park should be conlained within buildings and have very little, if any, outdoor storage other than business-relaled vehicle parking. All areas of the Industrial Park should be landscaped with grass, shrubs, trees, elc., and all roads, driveways and parking areas should be paved. Preserved open space areas might include such employee amenities as walking/jogging palhs or bike paths Io encourage exercise or alternative commuting. BP Business Park: This designation was designed for very unique situations. It allows small and very uno§trusive businesses to locate within or adjacent to residential neighborhoods. The primary zones are "BP (Business Park)", "PO (Professional Office)", and "MX (Mixed Use witli business emphasis)". These zones allow a limited variety of Iow-intensity commercial, office and manufacturing businesses thai are most compatible with residential neighbors. Care should be taken to ensure that development within the BP district is attractive, well-landscaped and an asset to Ihe neighborhood in which it is located. This designation may also serve as a buffer or transitional district. RE Resource Extraction: This designation is reserved for possible application lo areas that may be identified as mineral resource sites of commercial s!gnificance that should be protected from other types of development. The City has not used this designation because all known mineral/gravel resource extraction sites within tile City are already permitted, are in operation, and are zoned appropriately for industrial use. The RE designation could be appliedas the long-range intent on lands that are in a different short-term use. A phased zoning approach may work well in such a situation. T 'Frausportation Facilities: This designation has been applied to major Iransporlation facilities of regional siguificance, such as the ferry tcrminal and Kitsap Transit's bus maintenance and storage facilities. It might also be applied lo locations found to be uniquely suited for commuter parking lots, heliports, crc. There is no zone that is specifically related to this Plan designation, but all commercial and industrial zones are considered appropriate. 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 12 Land Use DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION P or OS Parks or Open Space: All active public parks and recreation areas and major passive open space areas are designated either "P (Park)" or "OS (Open Space)" on the Comprehensive Plan maps. The primary zone is "PS (Parks & Schools)" S School: All public schools arc designated "S" on the Comprehensive Plan and are zoned "PS (Parks & Schools)". Private schools are not so designated but are included ~. within their host zone. H llospital: Harrison Hospital and the Naval Hospital in Jackson Park are designated "ti" on the Plan maps. This designation is intended to show the locations of these facilities and not to determine their physical size. Hospitals are allowed in the "llC (Health Care)", "GB (General Business)" and "BC (Business Core)" zones. PW Public Works: This designation is intended to show the location of the City's major public works facility on Oyster Bay Avenue. It does not determine the physical size of that facility. Public Works facilities are allowed in the "lG (Industrial General)" and "lP (Industrial Park)" zones. U & UL Utilities & Utility Lands: The "U (Utilities)" designation shows the location of the City's main Utilities and Engineering of]ices on Olympus Drive in East Bremerton. Most utililies and their offices are permitted in other zones and don't require designation on the Plan maps. The designation "UL (Utility Lands)" is applied to major areas that are owned and operated by the City's Utility, primarily in areas west of Gorst. WS Watershed: This designation is applied only to tile City's Union'River Watershed that surrounds and protects tile reservoir behind Casad Dam. The related zone is "WS (Water Supply)" which is a very restrictive zone intended to protect tile water resource. Military This is a Iocational designation intended only to identify major military facilities such as Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Jackson Park and the Naval I lospital at Jackson Park. These facilities are also designated according to their primary uses. O,dy PSNS has a Plan designation but remains unzoned. 1997 Plan Amend. Ord. --- Page 13 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT Part 2 of 2: Capital Facilities Program Prepared by: BREMERTON PLANNING Adopted: April 5, 1995 Revised: October 23, 1996 Revised: September 1997 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan ELEMENT H CAPIIAL FACILITIES Part 2 of 2: Capital Facilities Program CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION A. AUTHORITY ............................................ CFP- 1 B. OVERVIEW ............................................. CFP- 1 C. DESCRIPTION .......................................... CFP-2 D. BACKGROUND .......................................... CFP-3 E. SCOPE ................................................ CFP- 3 F, PURPOSE AND INTENT ................................... CFP- 5 G. DEVELOPMENT AND AMENDMENT PROCESS ................ CFP - 6 2. CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM {CFP) A. OVERVIEW ............................................. CFP - 9 B. FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ................ CFP - 13 C. LAW ENFORCEMENT ................................... CFP - 20 D. MUNICIPAL ............................................ CFP- 27 E. PARKS & RECREATION .................................. CFP - 33 F. SANITARY SEWER ...................................... CFP - 43 G. SCHOOLS ............................................. CFP - 50 H. STORMWATER ......................................... CFP - 56 I. TRANSPORTATION ..................................... CFP- 61 J. WATER ............................................... CFP- 64 K. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN ................................ CFP - 74 Capital Facilities Element LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page CF-1 Capital Facilities Element Timeline ................................. CFP- 8 CF-2 Population Forecast: 1990-2012 .................................. CFP - 12 CF-3 Location of Fire Department Facilities .............................. CFP - 19 CF-4 Location of Police Department Facilities ............................ CFP - 26 CF-11 Location of Municipal Buildings and Parking Structures ................. CFP - 32 CF-5 Bremerton Park Facilities ........................................ CFP - 42 CF-6 Bremerton Sanitary Sewer System Service Area ...................... CFP - 49 CF-7 Bremerton School District ....................................... CFP - 55 CF-8 Bremerton Stormwater Drainage Basins ............................ CFP - 60 CF-9 Bremerton Arterial System ....................................... CFP - 63 CF-10 Bremerton Water Plan Service Area ............................... CFP - 73 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan ELEMENT H CAPITAL FACILITIES Part 2 of 2 -- Capital Facilities Program (CFP) 1. Introduction This Capital Facilities Program (CFP) document is the second part of the two-part document that makes up the Capital Facilities Element of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan. A. Authority, The State of Washington Growth Management Act of 1990 (GMA) requires that the City of Bremerton develop a comprehensive plan which contains several elements, including a "capital facilities plan element". The long-range Capital Facilities Plan and the short- range Capital Facilities Program make up the capital facilities element required by the GMA. This Capital Facilities Element was developed under the direction of the City's Planning Commission and adopted as an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The element was developed pursuant to the authority conferred by the Washington State Constitution; the Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 36.70A; and Chapter 2.12 of the City's Municipal Code. B. Overview The Capital Facilities Element is organized into two documents, which contain the following sections: PART I- CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1. INTRODUCTION -- Includes authority, overview, description, background, GMA requirements, scope, purpose and intent, and development and amendment process. 2. PLANNING FRAMEWORK -- Lists applicable GMA goals and regional policies with which the Capital Facilities Element must be consistent. 3. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN -- A long-range policy plan containing guidelines for capital improvements. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 1 Capital Facilities Program Introduction PART fl - CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM (CFP) 1. INTRODUCTION -- Includes authority, overview, description, background, GMA requirements, scope, purpose and intent, and development and amendment process. 2. CAPITAL FACILITIES Program (CFP) --Includes an inventory of capital facilities, a forecast of future capital facility needs, and a six-year finance program for capital facilities. C. Description The Capital Facilities Element will guide public decisions on the use of capital funds. It will also indirectly guide private development decisions by providing a strategy of planned public capital expenditures. The element consists of two parts: a long-range Capital Facilities Plan and a short-range Capital Facilities Program (CFP). · Part 1: The Capital Facilities Plan is a long-range policy plan containing the City's main guidelines for capital improvements. It contains policies and strategies for adequate public facilities and services, funding, programming, maintenance, economic development and neighborhood revitalization, location and design, and the urban growth area. The plan provides the long-range policy guidance to develop and provide direction for the Capital Facilities Program (CFP). · Part 2: The Capital Facilities Program (CFP) contains an inventory of existing and proposed capital facilities, forecasts future needs for facilities, and identifies deficiencies in capital facilities and the actions necessary to meet such deficiencies. The program also provides the GMA-required six-year finance plan. The finance plan contains funding and scheduling of individual projects for all capital facilities including transportation and utility facilities. Detailed financial plans of outside agencies and special districts are included by reference. The CFP is under separate cover to facilitate an annual update of the six-year finance plan. The Capital Facilities Element is consistent with the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, as required by the GMA. Part I of the element -- the Capital Facilities Plan -- contains goals, objectives, and policies which are consistent and compatible with statewide planning requirements, goals and policies, with the regional goals and policies adopted by the Puget Sound Regional Council under Vision 2020, and with the Kitsap Countywide Planning Policy. Part 2 -- the CFP -- contains a six-year work program to implement the Land Use, Housing, and Transportation Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 2 Capital Facilities Program Introduction D. Background The Capital Facilities Plan and Program (CFP) differ from the City's previous Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Previously, the scheduling of physical improvements was based on anticipated available financial resources and on a priority listing of capital improvement needs for a five year period. While some projects in the ClP were incorporated into the Annual Budget, the ClP acted merely as a "wish list" of projects, often with no identified funding sources. In contrast, this Capital Facilities Plan sets policy direction for determining capital improvement needs, evaluating proposed capital improvement projects, establishing funding priorities, and guiding funding alternatives. The Capital Facilities Program (CFP) contained in Part 2 of the element establishes level of service standards for facilities and a financing plan for facility improvements covering the entire six-year period. Along with the Capital Facilities Element, the City's capital facilities planning effort also involves preparation of a Capital Improvement Program and an Annual Budget. · Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - The City's Capital Improvement Program is a six-year plan for spending public funds on capital facilities and amenities needed to address, support and implement the City's Comprehensive P/an and other adopted City plans and programs. The CIP only covers City of Bremerton programs. · Annual Budget - The City's annual budget authorizes expenditures for all city expenses, including the acquisition or development of capital facilities. The annual capital budget differs from the financing plan contained in the Capital Facilities Program in that it covers only capital projects receiving City funding. E. Scope The scope of the Capital Facilities Program (CFP) is city-wide and beyond. It includes all areas within the incorporated city limits, as well as areas surrounding the city which have been identified as Bremerton's urban growth area in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Public facilities and utilities include a variety of properties, improvements and services often administered by governmental agencies for the general public. Examples of public facilities include city administration buildings, parks and recreational facilities, libraries and public schools. Utilities include electrical, telecommunication, and refuse collection utilities. Certain facilities and utilities are provided by the City of Bremerton, while others are provided by other agencies, special districts, or companies. The Definitions section of this element defines "capital facilities", "capital improvement project", and related terms. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 3 Capital Facilities Program Introduction Transportation and circulation-related facilities are addressed in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Public and private utilities within the City are addressed in the Utilities Element. The scope of the Capital Facilities Element extends from the general long-range Capital Facilities Plan to the highly specific short-range Capital Facilities Program (CFP). For the City of Bremerton, the scope of the Capital Facilities Program (CFP) is: fire and police protection; municipal buildings and parking structures; parks, recreation facilities and open space; streets; schools; stormwater management; and sewer and water distribution systems. An inventory and analysis of certain publicly-owned capital facilities is provided in the CFP. Table CF-1 (page CFP-9) lists types, descriptions and providers of capital facilities specifically addressed by the CFP. For the purposes of this CFP, the City of Bremerton uses the following definition of a capital improvement project: A project to create, expand or modify a capital facility. The project may include design, permitting, environmental analysis, land acquisition, construction, landscaping, site improvements, initial furnishings and equipment. The project cost must exceed $35,000 in 1996 dollars. Capital improvements are major projects or activities requiring the expenditure of public funds over and above annual operating expenses. They have a life expectancy of more than ten years and result in an addition to the City's fixed assets and/or extend the life of the existing capital infrastructure. Capital improvements do not include capital outlay items such as equipment or vehicles. An exception for rolling stock could be a purchase necessary to accommodate increased service capacity due to population growth such as emergency medical service units or fire apparatus. Examples are: · Land or site acquisition; · Building or structure acquisition, construction or major maintenance; · Major repairs or renovations to the City's infrastructure (e.g., buildings, structures, etc.); · Major site improvements; · Utility installations or major replacements, repairs or improvements to utilities; · Street construction and improvements; and · Major design and engineering efforts associated with identified capital projects. The Municipal Utilities and outside agencies (Bremerton School District, Port of Bremerton, Kitsap Transit, etc.) work under their own definitions of capital improvement projects which may or may not include such things as rolling stock. Also, the City of Bremerton uses a somewhat different definition for its Capital Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 4 Capital Facilities Program Introduction Improvement Program (CIP), which includes projects costing $10,000 or more, and does include rolling stock. F. Purpose and Intent The purpose of the shod-range Capital Facilities Program (CFP) is to establish the City's work program for capital facilities for the next six years, to carry out the intents and policies of the Capital Facilities Plan, Transportation Element, and Utility Element, and to give further direction to implement the strategies of the plans. The Capital Facilities Plan and CFP make up the plan element that will bring the rest of the Comprehensive Plan to life. It fulfills the GMA requirement to assure that needed capital facilities will be financed. This requirement is the mechanism to ensure that the growth envisioned in the plan can really happen. The available capacity of public facilities will affect the type, amount and rate of growth. Because of the complexity of the relationships between land use and public facilities and services, the Capital Facilities Plan and Program will lay a foundation for the coordination and consistency of infrastructure plans and programs, including those of transportation and utilities. The Capital Facilities Element is a tool for coordination of the City's physical and fiscal planning. It is a mechanism for ongoing communication and cooperation between various City departments, and between the City, the County, and other providers of public services. The Capital Facilities Element promotes efficiency by requiring the City to prioritize capital improvements for a longer period of time than the single budget year. Long range financial planning presents the opportunity to schedule projects so that the various steps in development logically follow one another with regard to relative urgency, economic desirability, and community benefit. In addition, the process of identifying adequate funding sources results in the prioritization of needs, and allows trade-offs between projects to be evaluated frankly. The Six Year Financial Program contained in the Element will guide decisionmaking to achieve the community goals as articulated in the Vis/on for Bremerton and Planning Goals Elements. The purpose of the Capital Facilities Element is to: · Serve as a guide for making decisions that will improve the quality of facilities and services. · Ensure the proper coordination and timing of the provision of adequate facilities and services with land use development. Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 5 Capital Facilities Program Introduction · Coordinate and provide consistency among City plans for public facilities, including transportation and utilities, and capital facilities plans of regional, state and federal governments and plans of special districts (e.g. schools, libraries, and port districts). · Provide direction to facilities and infrastructure service providers to help them meet the needs of existing and new development. · Discuss locations and capacities of existing and proposed facilities. · Maintain the quality of life by establishing level of service standards for public facilities. · Determine the financial resources available for capital facilities projects and improvements. · Document all capital projects and their financing. · Provide direction for the provision of services in the City of Bremerton's urban growth area. · Ensure the timely provision of adequate facilities as required in the Growth Management Act. G. Development and Amendment Process The Capital Facilities Element was developed by City of Bremerton Department of Community Development staff with the assistance of numerous citizens and city staff. A Parks and Recreation Capital Facilities Plan Subcommittee, consisting of Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission members, along with Parks & Recreation Department staff, helped develop parks-related material in Spring 1993. The Bremerton Planning Commission Citizen Advisory Committee worked on the draft element during 1994. Finally, the Planning Commission and City Council held several study sessions and public hearings before the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in April 1995. The Capital Facilities Program will be updated annually in conjunction with the annual update of the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and development of the annual budget. The objectives and tasks will be reviewed to determine what has been accomplished, and the strategies and activities of the Capital Facilities Plan and Utility Element will be reviewed to determine what future objectives should be undertaken. Tasks will then be formulated for the chosen objectives. (See Figure CF-1 Capital Facilities Element Timeline.) Proposed amendments to the program will receive detailed review by the Planning Commission, and public hearing(s) will be held to solicit public comment. The Commission will consider any such comments and make a formal recommendation to the City Council. The Council will further review the proposal, hold a public hearing for public comments, make modifications if Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 6 Capital Facilities Program Introduction - necessary, and adopt the proposed amendments as part of the Capital Facilities Program. Revisions to the CFP may occur, at most, once a year and must be considered concurrently with any other amendments proposed to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan. Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 7 Capital Facilities Program Introduction Relationship Among Capital Facilities Element's Policy Plan, Capital Facilities Program, and City Budget Policy Plans January I c~ ~'~ Programs April Capital through Programs ~ FacUlties · S~lus / Operating Budget Budget Figure CF-I Capital Facilities Element Timeline Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 8 Capital Facilities Program 2. Capital Facilities Program (CFP) An Inventory, Analysis, and Six-Year Financing Plan A. Overview The Capital Facilities Program (CFP) is a six-year document which provides the main support for all actions that satisfy the policy intent of the long-range Capital Facilities Plan. This Program contains an inventory of existing and proposed capital facilities; forecasts future needs for facilities; and identifies deficiencies in capital facilities and the actions necessary to meet such deficiencies. It also provides the GMA-required six-year finance plan to fund the needed capital facility improvements and projects for the next six years. The inventory presented in the Capital Facilities Program provides background information on those capital facilities for which the City has a responsibility. It also summarizes new capital improvement projects for the existing population, new capital improvement projects necessary for the growth projected through 2000, and major repair, renovation, or replacement of existing facilities. The six-year finance plan contains funding and scheduling of individual projects for all capital facilities including transportation and utility facilities. Detailed financial plans of outside agencies and special districts are included by reference. 1. Types and Providers of Capital Facilities The chart on the following page lists the types and providers of capital facilities addressed by this Program. (Table CFP-'I Sections on each facility type follow in alphabetical order. The analysis of each type of capital facility includes: · Inventory of Existing Facilities · Forecast of Future Needs · Level of Service Standards · Need for Facility Capital Improvements · Plans of Other Providers · Planned Capital Improvement Projects Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 9 Capital Facilities Program CFP Overview Fire and City of Provides facilities that support the provision of Emergency Bremerton Fire fire and emergency services. Services Dept. Law City of Provides facilities that support the provision of · Draft Bremerton Facilities Enforcement Bremerton law enforcement services. Study, 1985 Police Dept. Municipal City of Provides municipal buildings and parking · Draft Bremerton Facilities Bremerton structures. Study, 1985 Parks City of Provides facilities for passive and active · Land Use Element Bremerton recreational activities. · Parks & Recreation Parks & Comprehensive Plan, Recreation 1995 Dept. Streets City of Provides streets, sidewalks, traffic controls, · Transportation Element Bremerton and street lighting. · Six-Year Transportation Dept. of Public Improvement Program Works & (TIP), 1997 Utilities Sanitary Sewer Bremerton Provides facilities used in collection, · Wastewater Municipal transmission, storage, treatment or discharge Comprehensive Plan, Wastewater of waterborne waste within most developed 1996 Utility portions of city and some surrounding unincorporated areas. Schools Bremerton Provides elementary and secondary facilities · Bremerton School District School District for instruction in the several branches of Capital Facilities Plan: In learning and study required by the Basic Support of the School Education Code of the State of Washington. Impact Fee Program, July 1992 Storm Water Bremerton Provides facilities that collect and transport · Ord. 4454 Management Municipal stormwater runoff. · Bremerton Stormwater Stormwater Management Plan, 1995 Utility Water Bremerton Provides supply of potable water from system · Water System Municipal of surface water and wells. Service area Comprehensive Plan, Water Utility includes developed portions of city and 1992 surrounding unincorporated areas. Utility also contracts to provide water to additional areas (Tracyton, Rocky Point, PSNS, and Port of Bremerton airport and industrial park. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 1 0 Capital Facilities Program CFP Overview 2. Growth Assumptions The CFP is based on the following population assumptions: Year Population 1996 38,500 2001 41,893 2012 58,142 The 1996 population estimate was prepared by the Bremerton Department of Community Development. Bremerton's population fluctuates regularly with shifts in PSNS staff levels. The State Office of Financial Management (OFM) prepares quarterly updates documenting changes in Navy population counts. This 1996 estimate represents an average of recent OFM quarterly updates. The year 2001 population forecast was prepared by the City. It represents continuation of existing growth trends until at least year 2001. This forecast is based on the assumption that the effects of Growth Management goals to promote infill in urban areas will not be seen in the city until some interval after Kitsap County adopts policies and regulations to limit sprawl in the unincorporated areas. This forecast is illustrated in the chart on the following page. The year 2012 population forecast was approved by the Kitsap Regional Planning Council in 1995 for use by Kitsap County in complying with the Growth Hearings Board order to revise the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 11 Capital Facilities Program E %~'¢~ OSSoJgUI% (~610~) IfOUnOO 8u~uueld leUOJSa~ pun~ l~6nd -- ls~Joj .,SUeld 8u!ls!x9,.: ~-~ ~gg'gs g~ ~ ~OC 9gL'SS Pt OtOg SSZ'OS t t ZOOZ gZZ'6¢ Ot 900Z ~Og'Zff 6 SOOg ~6g'Lff g LOOZ ~' L ~ k 000~ ' LLZ'L~ ¢ 666L - OZg'O~ E 966 ~ OO9'g~ 6~g'O~ ~ Z66 ~ ~ OZ~'9~ ggL'O~ 966~ ~aJGlenlov maJBIOd~ ~eeAueld ; JeaA;:; B. Fire and Emergency Medical Services The City of Bremerton Fire Department is responsible for providing emergency and non- emergency fire, rescue and medical services. The capital facilities used by the Fire Department include station buildings, emergency medical services (EMS) vehicles, fire trucks, fire engines and fire boats. (See Figure CF-3) 1. Emergency Medical Services (Ems) a. Inventory of Existing Facilities -- EMS The City has three EMS vehicles. Two units (Medic #2 and Medic #3) each cover half of the city, while one (Medic #2-A) is maintained as a reserve unit to fill in as needed. Under the City's rotation policy, EMS units are replaced every three years. Each time a new unit is added, the reserve unit is replaced by the next oldest unit. (Table EM-I) Medic #2 Callow Avenue to West Bremerton City Limits 1 Medic #3 Callow Avenue to Downtown to East Bremerton City Limits 1 Total Active Units = 2 Medic #2-A City-wide (replacement for #2 & #3) 1 Medic #3-A City-wide 1 Total Reserve Units = 2 Total Units= 4 Source: Bremerton Fire Department b. Forecast of Future Needs -- EMS (1) Existinq Demand Between 75-80% of Kitsap County CenCom (Central Communications) calls are for EMS. Over the last five years there has been a 5.4% per year increase in CenCom calls. The number of EMS calls inside the city has been increasing even though the population has not grown. This is due to a combination of factors, including an aging population, a Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 13 Capital Facilities Program Fire and Emergency-Medical Services concentration of convalescent centers and retirement homes near the hospital, and an economy in which people may tend to call for EMS to avoid the expense of a doctor. Some 96% of the calls for service are inside the city limits. The current response time is about 4.6 minutes for all responses. There are deviations in some areas, such as the golf course. These are handled through mutual aid agreements with other fire districts. (2) Level of Service (LOS) The level of service for EMS facilities is a function of response time and call volumes. These in turn are dependent on the number and location of fire stations, the number of fire apparatus units, and the number of firefighters available. The City is developing a LOS monitoring system that measures EMS response time (time needed to respond to a call) and call volumes (the number of calls received from different areas). In the meantime, the need for EMS facilities can be estimated by monitoring response times. The American Heart Association recommends a 4.0 minute EMS response time for Basic Life Support (BLS) and an 8.0 minute response time for Advanced Life Support (ALS). Past these times, a heart patient's chance of survival goes down significantly. · Current LOS = 4.6 minutes for BLS and ALS (or 3.3 minutes 90% of the time) · Proposed LOS = 5.0 minutes for BLS 8.0 minutes for ALS (3) Future Demand Bremerton's population is expected to grow by 3,410 by year 2000, and by an additional 16,590 by year 2014. CenCom projects a two-fold increase in calls between 1992 and 2005. The City is expected to continue to receive about half of these calls regardless of whether the population increases. (Table EM-2) Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 14 Capital Facilities Program Fire and Emergency_Medical Services Table EM-2 Sixteen Year Need: EMS Time Period Demand (Population) EMS units required ~_. LOS 5.0~8.0 minute response times Six-Year Need 1996 38,500 3 1997-2001 (new) 3,393 0 Total as of 2001 = 41,893 3 Sixteen-Year Need: 2002-2012 (new) 16,249 1 Total as of 2012 = 58,142 4 1996-2012 (new) 19,642 1 Source: Bremerton Fire Department (4) Need for Capital Facility Improvements The anticipated total need for year 2014 is four EMS units -- three active EMS units and one reserve unit. Mutual aid agreements will satisfy other needs. (5) Plans of Other Providers The September 1994 Kitsap County Draft Capital Facilities Element recommends a five-minute response time (from time of call to first unit on site) in urban areas, and a ten-minute response time in rural areas. To provide this LOS, it recommends that stations be located within a five- mile radius of each other, and that a 24-hour career staffed station be located within 10 miles of all areas. It uses replacement schedules for EMS/Aid units based on a five-year replacement cycle, unless otherwise stated. (6) Proposed Facilities The City will need one additional EMS unit at Station #1 sometime within the next five years. Existing EMS units are scheduled to be replaced every three years. However, the replacement schedule may be moved up to every two years if call volumes continue to increase. c. Six-Year Financing Plan -- EMS The six-year financing play for emergency medical service facilities is included in Section J of this Capital Facilities Program. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - '15 Capital Facilities Program Fire and Emergency-Medical Services 2. Fire Protection Services a. Inventory of Existing Facilities -- Fire Protection The City has three fire stations, one each located in west, central and east Bremerton. The City also has one drill tower/boat house, which is due to be demolished. There are seven fire apparatus and two specialty vehicles. Three of six fire engines are reserve units, on stand-by to replace the three active units. Although there are seven fire apparatus, three engines are not staffed. The ladder truck, fireboat, and rescue crew are staffed by the Engine #1 crew. (Table FP-f) Table FP.1 , ~ Inventory of ExiSting FacilitieS:--Fire proteCtion : BUildings ~ Size (square feet) Fire Station No. 1 817 Pacific 15,346 Max Meigs Fire Station No. 2 5005 Kitsap Way 9,389 Ted Tillet Fire Station No, 3 3031 Olympus Drive 7,640 Total Buildings = 32,375 , Fire Apparatus Ser-¢ice Area Fire Trucks Ladder #1 I All of City Limits 1 Total Fire Trucks = 1 Fire Engines Engine #1 Downtown Bremerton to Callow Avenue 1 Engine #1-A (Reserve) Same as Engine #1 1 Engine #2 Callow Avenue to West Bremerton City 1 Limits Engine #2-A (Reserve) Same as Engine #2 1 Engine #3 East Bremerton to City Limits 1 Engine #3-A (Reserve Same as Engine #3 1 Total Fire Engines = 6 Total Fire Apparatus = 7 Specialty VehiCleS i : . Marine-20 Fireboat I Sinclair and Dyes Inlets 1 Total = 1 Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 1 6 Capital Facilities Program Fire and Emergency_Medical Services b. Forecast of Future Needs -- Fire Protection (1) Existing Demand The City has three fire stations and four active fire apparatus serving about 38,500 persons--approximately one station per 12,833 people, and one fire apparatus unit per 9,625 people. The current response time is about 5.44 minutes for both emergency and non-emergency calls. The City has a Class 3 insurance rating based on manpower, water supply, etc. (2) Level of Service (LOS) The need for fire protection facilities is a function of response time and call volumes. These in turn are dependent on the number and location of fire stations, the number of fire apparatus units, and the number of firefighters available. Until the City's monitoring system can be further quantified, fire facilities needs can be estimated by monitoring response times. · Current LOS = 5.44 minutes response time for both emergency and non-emergency calls. · Proposed LOS = 5.0 minutes response time. (3) Future Demand The projected population growth within the service area is for approximately 3,393 new people by year 2001, and an additional 16,249 new people by 2014. (Table FP-2) Table FP-2 Sixteen Year Need: Fire Protection Apparatus Time Period Demand (Population) I Fire Protection Units Required(~ LOS 5.44 minute I response time Six-Year Need 1996 38,500 3 1997-2001 (new) 3,393 0 Total as of 2001 = 41,893 3 Twenty-Year Need 2002-2012 (new) 16,249 4 Total as of 2012 = 58,142 7 1996-2012 (new) 19,642 4 Source: Bremerton Fire Department Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 17 Capital Facilities Program Fire and Emergency-Medical Services (4) Need for Capital Facility Improvements The anticipated total need for year 2014 is seven fire apparatus. No additional buildings will be needed. (5) Plans of Other Providers The September 1994 Kitsap County Draft Capital Facilities Plan recommends a five-minute response time (from time of call to first unit on site) in urban areas. To achieve this LOS it recommends that stations be located within a five mile radius of each other to provide blanket coverage throughout the county. The element uses replacement schedules for most vehicles based on a 20-year replacement cycle, and for rescue vehicles based on a 10-year cycle, unless otherwise stated. (6) Proposed Facilities (a) Buildings The City, in partnership with several Fire Districts, plans to replace the existing drill tower with a more suitable facility. (b) Fire Apparatus Because the City currently has seven apparatus, no additional apparatus will be needed. However, the City will need to replace its existing fire engines toward the end of the 20 year period, and additional crews will be needed to staff all seven apparatus. No change in the existing number of stations will be needed. c. Six-Year Financing Plan -- Fire Protection The six-year financing plan for fire protection facilities is located in Section K of this Capital Facilities Program. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 18 Capital Facilities Program Fire and Emergency-Medical Services 1 Figure CF-3 Bremerton Fire Department Facilities Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 19 Capital Facilities Program C. Law Enforcement 1. Inventory of Existing Facilities -- Law Enforcement The capital facilities used by the Police Department are buildings and vehicles for patrol officers, investigations officers and administrative staff. (Since the cost of vehicles is less than the $35,000 capital facilities threshold, these costs are included in the City's Capita//mprovement Program/CIP) and Annual Budget, but not in the Capita/Faci/ities E/ement.) The Police Department is currently spread out over four facilities in four different locations. Administrative functions are concentrated in City Hall, convenient to the Municipal Court. A new Community Resources office is located in a store front setting next door to City Hall. However, the Patrol Division is housed in the West Precinct, along with the Animal Control Division, and the Drug and Gang units are located in the old Capital Hill Fire Station. (See Figure CF-4) (The City currently contracts with Kitsap County for jail services.) (Table LE-1) FaCility Name : :: ;:: : SiZ~ (sq?i} City Hail/Police 239 Fourth Street 7,085 Community Resources 245 Fourth Street 1,400 West Precinct/Patrol Headquarters 4846 Auto Center Way 3,700 West Precinct/Animal Control 4846 Auto Center Way 450 Capital Hills Fire Station/Special Investigative Unit (SIU) 3001 Sixth Street 5,400 Total = 18,035 Sources: "Facilities Management Alternative Plans", Department of Public Works and Utilities, 2/14/94; and Bremerton Police Department. 2. Forecast of Future Needs -- Law Enforcement a. Existinq Demand The City has 62 law enforcement officers operating out of approximately 18,000 square feet of buildings -- 290 square feet per officer (including support staff). b. Level of Service {LOS) The need for law enforcement facilities can be estimated by projecting the number of officers that will be needed to serve the forecasted population, and calculating the building space needed per officer. Currently, with 62 officers, Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 20 Capital Facilities Program Law Enforcement there is one officer per 615 persons. There is no consensus on staffing levels for local police departments. The ratio of both officers and total police employees to population size is significantly related to crime rates. However, there are many variables that enter into crime rates. Such standards have limited meaning because the actual number required will vary depending on the size of a city, geographic region, and type of city. Even cities of the same population size and type may differ widely in staffing needs because of differences in demographics, socio-economic characteristics, climate or other unique conditions. Washington State cities as a whole have an average of 1.6 officers per 1,000 population. Bremerton's staffing level is the same as the state average. Compared with available staffing levels from several Washington cities, Bremerton's staffing level falls between Yakima, which has a higher population, and Des Moines, which has a lower population? City Population Officers/1000 Seattle (1989) 531,400 3.06 Yakima 54,843 1.7 Washington average --- 'I. 6 Bremerton 38,500 1.6 Des Moines 21,330 1.5 Moses Lake 12,190 1.9 Poulsbo 5,415 2.3 The Police Department feels that its current staffing level is too Iow, given the City's crime rate. The Department recommends that 70 officers could provide a preferred level of service for the existing population. While the City's staffing level is the same as the state average, it may be that escalating crime rates are catching many cities short of staff. Another difficulty in linking staff levels to population in Bremerton is that the City's population fluctuates up and down with Navy population levels. For example, Bremerton's population dropped from 38,142 in 1990 to a Iow of 35,920 in April 1994. In 1995 it climbed to 39,610, and in 1996 it is down again to about 38,500. Police Department staffing levels need to take into account these typical population fluctuations. The following table contrasts 1990 and 1996 levels of service for officers with the Department's preferred staffing level. ~ Source: Level of Service Standards: Measures for Maintaining the Quality of Community Life, Municipal Research Services Center of Washington, Report No. 31, September 1994. Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFR - 21 Capital Facilities Program Law Enforcement Table LE-2 Level of Service - Law Enforcement Officers Year Population Officers Officers per 1,000 Population 1990 38,142 58 1.52 1996 38,500 62 1.61 P referred * 38,142 70 1.84 "Preferred LOS for Law Enforcement Officers is based on actual 1990 population. Source: Bremerton Police Department. The Police Department considers the existing building space to be inadequate for the current staff level of 62 officers. The existing law enforcement facilities are spread out in four different locations, and building space is not efficiently designed for law enforcement purposes. This is particularly true at the Capital Hill facility, which houses nine officers in 5,400 sq.ft. (600 sq.ft./officer). A more accurate measure of the existing space per officer can be determined by omitting the Capital Hill facility and staff from the calculation. Including the Capital Hill facility and staff, the Current Level of Service is 290 square feet per officer. Without that facility and staff, the Adjusted Current LOS is 238 sq.ft, per officer (12,635 sq.ft. / 53 officers). The proposed LOS is lower than the Current LOS, but higher than the Adjusted Current LOS, assuming that the existing facilities will be replaced with a more efficiently designed facility. The Proposed LOS assumes that new facilities will be located in a remodeled existing building rather than in a new facility that could be designed to meet law enforcement needs most efficiently. · Current LOS = 290 square feet per officer · Adjusted Current LOS = 238 square feet per officer · Proposed LOS = 250 square feet per officer c. Future Demand The projected population growth within the City is for 19,642 new people by year 2012. At the current level of service for law enforcement officers, the City would need 94 officers by year 2012 -- 32 additional officers. At the Police Department's preferred staff level of service, the City would need 107 officers by year 2012 -- 45 additional officers. (Table LE-3) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - :2:2 Capital Facilities Program Law Enforcement Table LE-3 Future Need -- Law Enforcement Officers 1996 2001 2012 Total New Population/Officers 1996-2012 Population 38,500 41,893 58,142 19,642 Officers (~ 1996 Officer LOS 62 67 94 32 Officers @ Preferred Officer 71 76 107 36 LOS Source: Bremerton Department of Community Development. d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements To maintain existing staff levels to year 2012 at 250 sq.ft, per officer, the Police Department would need 23,500 square feet -- an increase of 5,465 sq.ft, over 16 years. To maintain the Department's preferred officer level of service to 2012, it would need 26,750 square feet -- an increase of 8,715 sq.ft. (Table LE-4) Table LE~ FUture Need: Law Enforcement: BUilding Area (Square Feet) : : ScenariO* : 1996:ActUal 1996 Need 2001 Need 2012 Need 1996,2012 Increase 1996 Officer LOS 18,035 15,500 16,750 23,500 5,465 Preferred Officer LOS 18,035 17,500 19,000 26,750 8,715 * Staff levels per Table LE-3 @ 250 sq.ft./officer. ** 1996-2012 Increase = 2012 Need - 1996. The following table shows the future need for Police Department building area by year 2001 and by year 2012 at the proposed LOS of 250 sq.ft, per officer. The year 2001 need is based on continuation of the 1996 Officer LOS (1.61 officers per 1,000 population). · The year 2012 need is based on a gradual increase in staff levels after year 2001, with the goal of achieving the Preferred Officer LOS (1.84 officers/1000) by year 2012. (Table LE-5) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 23 Capital Facilities Program Law Enforcement Table LE,5 Future Need: Law Enforcement Building Area Time Period Demand (Population) Officers * Square Feet Required (~ 250 sq.ft, per Officer Six-Year Need: 1996 38,500 62 15,500 1997-2001 (increase) 3,393 5 1,500 Total as of 2001 = 41,893 67 17,000 S xteen year Need i 2002-2012 (increase) 16,249 40 9,750 Total as of 2012 = 58,142 107 26,750 Total 1996-2012 (increase) = 19,642 45 11,250 · 2001 Need = 1996 Officer LOS; 2012 need = Preferred Officer LOS Source: Bremerton Department of Community Development e. Plans of Other Providers The May 3, 1996 draft Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan addresses sheriff facilities, as well as corrections, work release, and juvenile facilities to serve county-wide needs. The CFP lists a current (1994) LOS for sheriff offices of 122 square feet per 1,000 population. The proposed LOS of 151 square feet per 1,000 population is 29 square feet per 1,000 population (24 percent) higher than the County's current LOS. The proposed LOS requires an additional 7,780 square feet of space through the year 2000. The draft six year financing plan lists two related projects to meet this need: expansion of the Sheriff Administrative Office, and construction of a Silverdale Precinct Building. f. Proposed Facilities The City has been working to develop a City Facilities Management Plan. A Facilities Management Alternative Plans study was prepared in February, 1994 to help plan for near- to mid-term facilities needs for various City departments. The goal and objective of this plan are the following: 1. Consolidation of Departments to improve communication; coordination; and streamline department management goals and objectives; and 2. Economics resulting in less property to maintain; centralize departmental needs; and reduce department managers lost-time due to existing decentralized departments. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 24 Capital Facilities Program Law Enforcement Work on the facilities plan is currently on hold, pending finalization of downtown waterfront redevelopment plans. One proposal under consideration would move City offices to a new location to free up the present location for redevelopment. The City is concerned about the rising costs of providing jail services. However, there is no expectation that it would be cost-effective for the City to construct and staff a new jail facility in compliance with State regulations. Therefore, the City proposes to continue to contract with Kitsap County to provide jail services for the foreseeable future. 3. Six-Year Financial Plan The total need for year 2001 is estimated at 17,000 sq.ft, in one consolidated facility designed for law enforcement needs. The existing 18,000 feet, while not efficiently used, will accommodate this need, at least until other options can be examined. A proposal to construct a new City Hall is discussed under Section I. Municipal Buildings. The six-year finance plan for municipal buildings is listed in Section K under Other Funds; Facilities Projects. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 25 Capital Facilities Program Law Enforcement %. I, Figure CF-4 Bremerton Police Department Facilities Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 26 Capital Facilities Program D. Municipal 1. Inventory of Existing Facilities -- Municipal The inventory of existing municipal facilities includes general purpose buildings and parking structures. (Table MB-I) a, Municipal Buildings The inventory of existing municipal buildings includes general city administrative and court offices. Buildings which house specific governmental functions that are connected with other capital facility planning areas (e.g. Fire and Emergency Medical Services and Law Enforcement) are included in those sections of the Capital Facilities Element. This inventory does not include Public Works & Utilities Administration or Parks & Recreation Department buildings, which are not addressed elsewhere in the CFP. b. Parkinq Structures The inventory of parking structures includes the underground City Hall parking beneath City Hall Park and the City Parking Garage. FaCility Name Locati°n : size: General Government (Sq. Ft.) 1. City Hall (1) 239 4th Street 31,915 2. Permit Center 286 4th Street 10,000 Total General Government = 41,915 Parking Structures (Parking Stalls) 1. Underground Parking (City Hall) 225 4th Street ** 2. Municipal Parking Garage 451 Washington Ave. 295 Total Parking Stalls = .. Notes: (1) City Hall sq.ft. = 39,000 s,f, minus 7,085 s.f. used for Law Enforcement. ** To be determined. Source: Public Works & Utilities Department, 7/97. Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 27 Capital Facilities Program Municipal Buildings - 2. Forecast of Future Needs - Municipal a. Municipal Buildings Existing Demand The need for municipal buildings can be roughly estimated by comparing the building area (square feet) to the population served. The City has 41,915 square feet of general purpose municipal buildings serving approximately 38,500 persons. (Table MB-2) (2) Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS for municipal buildings is based on the existing building inventory (sq.ft.) divided by the City's 1996 population (38,500). To continue the existing LOS, the City would need 3,457 additional square feet by year 2001. (Table MB-2) The proposed LOS is 64 sq. ft. per 1,000 population (8%) lower than the City's current LOS. The proposed LOS is based on an assumption that the City would be able to serve a larger population using a lower LOS if space could be used more efficiently.2 (Table MB-3) · Existing LOS: 1,089 sq. ft. per 1,000 population (1.088701 per capita) · Proposed LOS: 1,025 sq.ft, per 1,000 population (1.025 per capita) 2 Level of Service for Administrative Facilities: "As communities grow, they generally must add staff and acquire equipment to handle the additional workload. As a result, they will probably need additional space to house new staff and equipment. Many city administration offices are crowded compared to their private sector counterparts. For instance, Urban Land Institute 1988 date shows a national-wide average of 347 square feet per employee. A 1988 Building Owner and managers survey on office space reports that employees in a production office enjoyed an average of 305 sq. ff. while those in a headquarters office on the average occupied 374 sq. ft. Note that these averages include accessory space such as restrooms, hallways and conference rooms (Macheski, 1991). A mini survey of comparable-sized cities conducted by Bainbridge Island found space per employee ratios ranging from 75 to 210 sq. ft. per employee. A committee conducting an analysis of Bainbridge Island's administrative office concluding that office space equaling 1149 sq. ft. per 1000 population and 365 sq ft per employee should be provided. These recommendations covered space for city hall, police and public works functions. Because city halls often serve as community centers in addition to housing office functions, the need for public meeting facilities may increase the amount of space needed per employee. (Level of Service Standards: Measures for Maintaining the Quality of Life, Municipal Research Services Center of Washington, September 1994, Report No. 31, pg. 89) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 28 Capital Facilities Program Municipal Buildings - Table MB-2 Future Needs Analysis: Municipal Buildings Current LOS = 1,089 square feet per 1,000 population (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Time period City population Sq.ft. required @ Sq.ft. available Net reserve or 1.088701 per capita deficiency 1996 Actual 38,500 41,915 41,915 0 1996-2001: Growth 3,393 3,457 0 -3,457 Total as of 2001 41,893 45,372 41,915 -3,457 (3) Future Demand The projected population growth within the service area is for 3,393 new residents by 2001. (Table MB-3) (4) Need for Capital Facility Improvements The proposed LOS would require an additional 4,503 square feet of space by the year 2001. (Table MB-3) · . Table'MB-3 ' LOS Capacity Analysis: MuniCipal AdministratiVe Offices· :i Proposed LOS = 1' 025 square feet per 1 000 population i (1) (2) (3) (4) ' i5) Time period City population Sq.ft. required @ Sq.ft. available Net: reserve or 1.025 per capita : deficiency 1997 Actual 38,500 39,463 41,915 2,453 1997-2002: Growth 3,393 3,478 (1,025) -4,503 Total as of 2001 41,893 42,940 42,940 0 Capacity projects: New City Hall 3. Proposed Municipal Facilities a. Municipal Buildings (1) Plans of Other Providers No other agencies provide space that can be used for general municipal purposes. Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 29 Capital Facilities Program Municipal Buildings - (2) Proposed Facilities The City conducted a preliminary facilities study in '1985 to consider the City's short-term and long-term facility needs. This study found that the City's existing facilities were generally inadequate to meet the City's current operating requirements, and that population growth would further increase facilities needs. The most critical needs identified at that time included: a substandard jail and crowded Municipal Court; dispersal of City administrative activities to various facilities; the quality of City Hail; and inadequate facilities for operational sections of Public Works. Several changes have been made since 1985, including closure of the jail, addition of the Permit Center, and construction of the new Oyster Bay Public Works & Utilities Operations Center. A follow-up Facilities Management Alternative Plans study was prepared in 1994 to help plan for near- to mid-term facilities needs for various City departments. Work on this study has been on hold, pending finalization of downtown waterfront redevelopment plans. Although the City does not expect to need additional capacity by 2001, the City recognizes that it needs to continue facilities planning to further consolidate activities and replace aging structures. There is considerable expense in operating and maintaining the current obsolete facilities. Communications, efficiency, and coordination are significantly more expensive in the existing facilities. New construction and design techniques would decrease operations and maintenance costs and improve the efficient provision of city services. Therefore, the City proposes to continue its on-going facilities study to focus on consolidation of City administrative functions, with the possible inclusion of courts and law enforcement functions, at one centralized site. If this can be done, the City expects that the effective level of service can be increased within the proposed LOS. Toward this end, the City is programming funds for replacement of City Hall, the Permit Center, and some or all of the facilities used by the Police Department (see Law Enforcement section) with once consolidated facility in 2002. b. Parkinq Structures (1) Existincj Demand (To be completed) (2) Level of Service (LOS (To be completed) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 30 Capital Facilities Program Municipal Buildings _ (3) Future Demand (To be completed) (4) Need for Capital Facility Improvements The Sinclair Landing Association has determined a need for a large parking structure in conjunction with the proposed Sinclair Landing development in downtown Bremerton. The City has determined that completion of the Sinclair Landing Project is critical to the future of the City. For the project to be successful, adequate public parking will be necessary. Therefore, the City proposes to purchase from the developer the multi-stow Sinclair Landing Parking Structure, which will serve the owners, employees and customers of the Sinclair Landing Project including the multi-modal transportation center. 4. Six-Year Financial Plan The six-year financial plan for municipal buildings is included in Section J of this CFP. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 31 Capital Facilities Program Municipal Buildings - rn ji I, Figure CF-5 Bremerton Municipal Buildings and Parking Structures Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 32 Capital Facilities Program E. Parks and Recreation The City of Bremerton provides a system of local parks (neighborhood and community parks), regional parks, and open space parks. This system is managed by the City's Parks and Recreation Department with the help of the Bremerton Parks and Recreation Commission. The park system service area consists of all land within the incorporated city limits. This parks and recreation capital facilities program reflects recommendations of the City of Bremerton Parks & Recreation Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1995, as updated by the City Parks & Recreation Department. 1. Inventory of Park Lands The following inventory lists local, regional, open space, and special use park lands. a. Local Parks To assist in analyzing service levels, local parks are divided into two categories: neighborhood and community parks. Bremerton has 206 acres of local park lands -- an increase of 1.05 acres since 1995. (1) Neighborhood Parks A neighborhood park is a combination playground and park designed primarily for non-supervised, non-organized recreation activities. In addition to their recreation value, neighborhood parks also provide a source of open space and aesthetic quality in the neighborhood. They are generally small in size (about 3-10 acres) and serve an area of approximately one half mile radius. The City's neighborhood parks range in size from less than one acre to more than 27 acres. The City has 39 acres classified as neighborhood parks -- an increase of three parks on 1.05 acres since 1995. The following table includes an inventory of the City's 13 neighborhood parks. (Table PK-1) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 33 Capital Facilities Program Parks and Recreation Table PR-1 Inventory of Neighborhood Parks Map # Park Name Address Total Capacity (Acres) 1 Forest Ridge Park Summit Avenue & I st Street 27.30 3 Kiwanis Playfield Between 4th & 5th at Veneta 3.00 32 McKenzie Basketball Court Juniper Court 0.02 5 Ninth Street Mini-park E. 9th & Shore Drive 0.02 33 Lower Roto Vista Park Elizabeth Street end 1.00 6 Roto Vista Park 17th & Warren Avenue 0.70 7 S.P. "Pat Carey Vista Tracyton Beach Drive 0.50 9 Smith Playfield 1198 Elizabeth 3,00 10 SR-3 Park Arsenal & Kitsap Way 3.80 34 Arvon Park Arvon Street 0.03 Total Neighborhood Park Acres = 39.37 (2) Community Parks A community park is planned primarily to provide active and structured recreation opportunities for young people and adults. In general, community park facilities are designed for organized activities and sports, although individual and family activities are also encouraged. Community parks can also provide indoor facilities to meet a wider range of recreation interests. Where there are no neighborhood parks, the community park can also serve this function. Community parks serve a much larger area and offer more facilities. They usually exceed 20 acres in size and often have sport fields, water bodies, gardens, nature trails or similar facilities as the central focus of the park. Their service area is at least a 1-2 mile radius. The City's community parks range in size from one third acre to 54 acres. The City has 167 acres of community park lands. The following table includes an inventory of these community parks. The list includes 149 acres of "community parks of regional significance". These are parks that have traditionally served as local parks, but because of special features such as waterfront access have taken on a regional role as well. For example, while Bachmann Park is a very small waterfront park in the Manette neighborhood, it has become a popular regional sailboard launching site. These parks are listed as a subcategory of community parks because they have been identified in the Kitsap Countywide Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan as parks with regional significance which are eligible for countywide funding participation. (Table PR-2) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 34 Capital Facilities Program Parks and Recreation Table PR-2 Inventory of Community Parks Map # Park Name Address Total Capacity (Acres) 12 Bataan Park Sylvan & Olympus Dr 1.00 13 Blueberry Park Sylvan Way 8.90 14 City Hall Park 4th & Washington 0.30 18 Jarstad Park Old Belfair Highway 4.00 20 Manette Park & Senior Citizens Center 1140 Nipsic 2.60 24 Warren Avenue Playfield 11th & Warren Avenue 3.00 25 Wycoff Memorial Park 1st & Pacific Ave. (CBD) 0.02 Subtotal = 17.82 Community parks of RegiOnal Significance 11 Bachmann Park Shore Drive & Trenton 0.50 15 Eastpark & G. Jarstad Aquatic Center Magnusson Way & Homer Jones 17.50 16 Evergreen Park 14th & Park Avenue 8.00 19 Kitsap Lake Park Price Road 31.90 4 Lent Lane Park Lebo Boulevard 1.50 22 N.A.D. Marine Park Shorewood Drive end 27.50 21 N.A.D. Park (upper) 6002 Kitsap Way 54.00 8 Sheridan Park (lower) Lebo Boulevard & Clare Street 8.00 23 Sheridan Park Community Recreation 680 Lebo Boulevard 4.00 Center Total Community Parks of Regional Significance = 148.90 Total Community Park Acres = 166.72 b. Regional Parks Regional parks are recreation areas that serve an entire region. They are usually large in size and often include areas of natural quality suitable for outdoor recreation activities such as golfing, picnicking, boating, fishing, swimming, camping and hiking. If located within an urban area, they sometimes offer a wider range of facilities and activities which servee the entire region. The City's regional parks range from two to 50 acres. The City has 67 acres of regional parks. However, if the 149 acres of "community parks of regional significance" are included (see Table PR-2), there are 216 acres of City parks serving the local region. The following table includes an inventory of the City's three regional parks. (Tab/e PR-3) Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 35 Capital Facilities Program Parks and Recreation Table PR-3 Inventory of Regional Parks Map # Park Name Address Capacity (Acres) :28 Bremerton Boardwalk Between 1st & 4th St. - downtown 2.00 waterfront 27 Lions Community Playfield Lebo at Hefner 15,00 29 Andy Pendergast Regional Park 1199 Union 50.00 Total Regional Park Acres = 67.00 c. Open Sp~ An open space park consists of undeveloped land primarily left in its natural environment, with recreation uses as a secondary objective. It is usually owned or managed by a governmental agency and may or may not have public access. This type of land often includes steep hillsides, wetlands, large forested areas or other similar spaces. In some cases, environmentally sensitive areas are considered as open space and include wildlife habitats, stream and creek corridors, forested areas or unique or endangered plant species. The City's open space lands are often heavily wooded, and development, if any, is usually limited to trails. Bremerton has 55 acres of open space, including a cemetery. In addition, the City maintains numerous beautification areas and pocket parks. The following table includes an inventory of Bremerton open space park lands. (Table PR-4) inventOry °f open sPeCe parks Map # park Name Address size(Acres) 7 Eastpark Nature Area Wheaton Way at Magnusson 14.40 13 Ivy Green Cemetery Naval Avenue 13.00 31 Stephenson Canyon Between Lewis Lane & Willow :28.00 Beautification Areas/Pocket Parks various locations Total Open Space Acres = 55.40 d. Special Use Facilities The City-owned Gold Mountain Golf Course is located several miles south of the developed pads of the City. It is listed separately from other park and recreation facilities because it is an "enterprise" facility that is intended to pay for itself. Generally, the development and operation of the golf course is financed with Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 36 Capital Facilities Program Parks and Recreatio_n user fees and other special enterprise revenues, including development and operating agreements with concessionaires. The size of the facility will nearly double, from 190 to 360 acres, with completion of the addition of a second 18 hole golf course. Table PR-5 Inventory of Special Use Facilities Map # Facility Name Address Capacity (Acres) 26 Gold Mountain Golf Course Old Belfair Highway 360.00 Total = 360.00 e. Total Park Lands The City has a total of 691 acres of park lands, including the municipal golf course. Without the golf course, the total is 220 acres. (Table PR-6) summary Inventory ~ AIl pa~k Lands TYpe Capaci~, (Acres) Neighborhood Parks 39.37 Community Parks 166.72 Regional Parks 67.00 Open Space Parks 58.40 subtotal= 33149 Special Use Facilities 360.00 Total = 691.49 2. Forecast of Future Park Needs a. Existing Demand With 691 acres of park lands serving 38,500 residents, the City has 18.0 acres of park lands per 1,000 persons (including the municipal golf course).. Without the golf course, the City has only 8.6 acres of parks per 1,000 persons. (Table PR- 7) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 37 Capital Facilities Program Parks and Recreation b. Level of Service (LOS) The need for park lands can be estimated by comparing the number of existing park acres per 1,000 persons with national standards. The National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) recommends a total LOS of 15-20 acres per 1,000 persons for local and regional park lands. The following table compares the Existing LOS (ELOS) and the LOS recommended by NRPA. The overall City LOS is within the recommended range if the municipal golf course is included. Without the golf course, the City LOS is far below the NRPA recommendation. Compared to the NRPA guidelines, the City has ample regional park lands but falls short in neighborhood, community, and open space park lands. (Table PR-7) Level of service (LOS): All park LandS TYPe' AcreS i ExiSting (2) Pr0P°Sed (3)i Neighborhood (1) 39.37 1.25 1.0 1.25 Community 166.72 5 4.3 3.98 Regional 67.00 5 - 10 1.7 1.60 ODen Space 58.40 3.6 1.5 1.39 : Subtotal= : 331~49; : ; 8;6;; :; Special Use Facilities 360,00 - 9.4 8.59 Total Park Lands = 691.49 15 18.0 16.82 (1) The NRPA Neighborhood Parks LOS includes 0.25 to 0.5 acres mini-park. (2) Existing LOS = Acres / 1996 Population x 1,000 (1996 pop. = 38.5). (3) Proposed LOS = existing + new acres / 2001 pop./1000 (41.893). The NRPA standards are intended for a "typical" community, and of course all communities differ. For example, while the NRPA recommended LOS indicates that Bremerton is deficient in open space parks, the City is surrounded by thousands of acres of open water. Although water bodies may not fall within the traditional meaning of "open space", nevertheless many Bremerton waterfront parks provide visual and physical access to miles of open water that would be difficult to quantify with a LOS. Likewise, distant mountain views visible from many parts of the city add to the perception of open space. The NRPA standards were shaped in the early part of this century.' Although they have been adjusted over the years, they may not represent today's needs and values. Accordingly, they are currently under review for possible revision. They are best viewed as rough guidelines -- useful, but not absolute. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 38 Capital Facilities Program Parks and Recreation The proposed LOS of 14.15 acres per 1,000 persons will be a decrease from the existing LOS. This is because even though park acreage will be increased by 12.95 acres by year 2001, this acreage will serve over 3,000 more City residents. A per capita version of the LOS is also listed for the purpose of calculating park needs to serve forecasted population growth. (Table PR-7) · Existing LOS = 18.0 acres per 1,000 persons (0.0179607 acres per capita.) · Proposed LOS = 16.82 acres per 1,000 persons (0.0168164 acres per capita.) c. Future Demand The projected population growth within the City is for 19,642 new people by year 2012, for a total population of 58,142. d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements The proposed LOS would result in a need for 286 additional acres of park lands by year 2012 -- a total of 978 acres. This goal may not be sustainable if the City's population grows as projected. (Table PR-8) Table PR-8 . FUture Need: Parks Time Period· Population ACres {~ 010~i68164 ~ CUrrent acres: Net rese~ve:°r . per caPita I available deficiency · i Six-Year Need · 1996 actual 38,500 647.43 691.49 44.06 1997-2001 (new) 3,393 57.06 44.06 -13.00 Total as of 2001 = 41,893 704.49 0.00 -13.00 Sixteen-Year N'eed ' ' ' ' 2002-2012 (new) 16,249 273.25 0.00 -27'3.25 Total as of 2012 = 58,142 977.74 0.00 -977.74 1997-2012 (new) 19,642 330.31 44.06 -286.25 3. Proposed Park Facilities a. Plans of Other Providers The 1994 Kitsap Countywide Comprehensive Park and Recreation P/an recommends that the various jurisdictions undertake a coordinated, countywide Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 39 Capital Facilities Program Parks and Recreation approach to facility development to meet present and projected park and recreation land and facility needs. The plan proposes a county-wide LOS of 12.75 acres per 1,000 persons. Both the existing and proposed City LOS are above the proposed County standard. The county-wide plan recommends that Kitsap County park and recreation agencies undertake a "strategic role" service approach where: a) the county provides park and recreation facilities and programs that no other agency can or is willing to provide; b) the county acts as a coordinator of local interests where facilities are provided by many other agencies; and c) the county performs as a facilitator where unique acquisition or development opportunities may occur that could be implemented or operated by the local city or other agencies. Under this strategy, the county will consider providing financial support for capital facilities that have regional use benefits. Examples in Bremerton are: Bremerton Boardwalk; Lions Field; Pendergast Regional Park; and Eastpark/Bremerton YMCA. The May 1996 draft Kitsap County Plan proposes a total LOS of 13.13 acres per 1,000 population for County-owned parks. This will require purchase of an additional 1,730 acres by year 2012. The County expects the LOS to decrease in future years, as park land acquisitions are completed. Expenditures will then be concentrated on development following acquisitions. b. Proposed City Facilities The City's 1995 Parks & Recreation Comprehensive Plan proposes ~ adding 184 acres of park lands. The largest project is an 18-hole addition to the Gold Mountain Golf Course (170 acres). The Golf Course is a high priority, as it provides capital revenues for other city parks. The Plan also anticipates acquisition of an additional 14 acres of local park lands (one of which has now been acquired). (Table PR-8) In addition to adding new park lands, the City recognizes that it needs to make more intensive use of some existing park lands. For example, the City proposes to develop a natural amphitheater on the hillside above the ninth green on the Olympic course at Gold Mountain Golf Course. The City recognizes the difficulty in maintaining the recommended LOS past the year 2000. There are few large tracts of undeveloped land left within the developed parts of the City today. As infill development continues there will be even less vacant land, and land prices are likely to increase correspondingly. These developments may make it impossible to meet typical acreage standards. To continue to pursue a goal of providing opportunities for recreation and enjoyment of open space in every neighborhood will be a particular challenge. One option is a proposal to purchase approximately 275 acres of State DNR land with timber in the area North of Riddell Road and East of SR 303. This project is contingent on annexation of the surrounding area and the use of associated tax revenue. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 40 Capital Facilities Program Parks and Recreation The City will need to seek creative ways of adding park lands within developed parts of the city where vacant land is scarce. For example, the City and School District are exploring the possibility of shared use of school recreation lands. Other solutions could include tree-lined "greenways" connecting park lands; and rooftop gardens, landscaped public courtyards, or fees in lieu of open space in high density areas. In the long run the City may need to develop LOS standards which will better measure alternative park and recreation opportunities. 4. Six-year Financing Plan The six-year financing plan for parks and recreation facilities is included in Section K of this Capital Facilities Program. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 41 Capital Facilities Program F. Sanitary Sewer Sanitary sewer facilities are provided by the Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities. A complete inventory, analysis of need, and capital improvements program are provided in the adopted Wastewater Comprehensive Plan (a.k.a. the "Wastewater Plan"). 1. Service Area The Wastewater Comprehensive Plan identifies a service area consisting of territory currently served by the Wastewater Utility, as well as areas adjacent to the city limits that are not now serviced but which could logically be served based on natural topography. The service area covers 13 drainage basins, of which five extend beyond the city limits into unincorporated county areas: Kitsap Lake, Tracyton Beach, Trenton Avenue, Sinclair Park, and Oyster Bay. The Utility provides sewage treatment to the sewered areas in the service aree4C~rough direct service and through specific contractual agreements with the U.S. Navy and Kitsap County Sewer District No. 1 (Navy Yard City). (Figure CF-7 Bremerton Sanitary Sewer System Service Area) The Port of Bremerton operates a public wastewater facility located in Olympic View Industrial Park (OVIP) on State Route 3 west of Gorst. The Port is exploring alternatives to provide this area with high level municipal sewer. The City has entered into an agreement with Kitsap County to participate in a Gorst Area Sewer Feasibility Study, which will examine alternatives for sewering the greater Gorst area, including the OVlP and airport. 2. Inventory of Existing Facilities The City sewerage system consists of sewage collection, transmission, treatment, and bio-solids utilization facilities. Included are more than 188 miles of gravity sewers, approximately 16 miles of pressure lines, and 33 pump stations. These facilities convey sewage to a secondary wastewater treatment plant located just south of West Hills. Additionally there are 16 combined sewer overflow (CSO) sites located within the sewer collection system. Approximately 60 percent of the system is composed of combined sanitary and stormwater sewers. (Table SS-l) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 43 Capital Facilities Program Sanitary Sewer Table SS-1 Inventory: Wastewater Treatment Facilities Facilities Address Capacity Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Plant ('/) 1600 Oyster Bay Ave W (3) 10.1 mgd Collection System: Pipe various 204 miles Wastewater Liftstations various 34 Forest Enhancement Sites One & Two (2) Near Gold Mtn. Golf Course 600 acres ('/) City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, May 1996. (2) City of Bremerton 1993 Biosolids Report to Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District. (3) Average flow for maximum month per NPDES permit. (a) Wastewater Treatment Plant The existing wastewater treatment plant was designed to have a peak hydraulic capacity of 29.5 million gallons per day (mgd). Peak flows in excess of 25 mgd are typical during wet months. Normal dry weather peak flow capacity without stormwater inflow is estimated at 8 mgd. Current annual average and maximum monthly flows to the wastewater treatment plant are about 80 percent of the average annual and maximum monthly flows for which it was designed. It is estimated that 21 percent of the annual average flow and 44 percent of the maximum month flow is stormwater inflow. Stormwater will be reduced from the system over the next several years under the City's CSO Reduction Plan. Once stormwater inflow is reduced, the treatment plant will have the capacity to serve approximately 58,000 people. (b) Forest Enhancement Program -- Biosolids Utilization The wastewater treatment plant produces approximately five million gallons of anaerobically digested biosolids each year. Because biosolids have fertilizer and soil amendment value the City began an active land application program several years ago to utilize the benefits of this wastewater process by-product. Biosolids are used to enhance tree growth and are currently applied to 600 acres of Utility- owned forest land. Since June 1992, 100 percent of the biosolids produced at the treatment plant have been utilized in this beneficial manner. The objective of the City's forest enhancement program is to develop an environmentally sound method of using the resource value of biosolids in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 44 Capital Facilities Program Sanitary Sewer 3. Future Needs a. Existinq Demand The Wastewater Plan estimates the 1990 population of the service area at 45,210, of which 38,140 were within the city limits and 7,070 outside the city. The plan estimates that approximately 37,000 persons within the service area were connected to the sewer system, leaving an unsewered population of 8,210.3 Kitsap County estimates that the total 1994 service area population was 46,928.4 The City estimates that the 1996 population is approximately 52,762? The average daily flow, including stormwater inflow, is 6.0 mgd. As CSO separation occurs, the average flow will be reduced accordingly? Minimum peak flow (peak flows occurring without storm water inflow) is estimated at 8 mgd. While the U.S. Navy is allocated 3.8 mgd, it is currently discharging only 1 mgd -- roughly equivalent to 10,000 population. (Table SS-2) b. Level of Service (LOS) The capacity of existing sewer facilities to serve future needs is determined by comparing the gallons of effluent per day now approved by the State, the number of existing connections, and the number of new people to be served. The number of new people is converted into the number of new residential connections based on assumptions of the number of persons per household, and the number of gallons of effluent generated per capita per day (gpcd). The capacity can also be estimated based on an existing and planned LOS for sewer service. The calculation of the current LOS excludes stormwater inflow. (Although the City's system experiences some infiltration, it is not a major component of the flow.) The proposed LOS is the existing county-wide average. 3Source: Table 1., City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, December 1995, p. A-2 (Estimate prepared in 1992). 4Source: Table SS-2. Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan Sewer Facilities - 20-Year Population Allocation - CSF #1, Draft Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Part II, April 1996, Pg.. 3-87. The County population estimate is for the total service area, and does not include an estimate of the sewered or unsewered populations. SThe City population estimate is based on the Kitsap County population estimate for the unincorporated part of the sewer service area, along with the City estimate within the city limits. (See page CFP-9) 6Source: Bremerton Wastewater Utility, 9/96. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 45 Capital Facilities Program Sanitary Sewer - · Current LOS = 97 gallons per capita per day (gpcd)7 · Proposed LOS = 100 gpcd c. Future Demand The May 1996 draft Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan estimates that a total of 66,096 persons within the sewer service area will require sanitary sewer service by year 2012, an increase of 19,168 persons from 1992. The County plan estimates that this increase includes 1,111 persons that were not connected to the sewer system in 1992. (Table SS-2) Table SS,2 KitsaP c°unty Ca pita! FaCilities Plan sewer FaCilities . 20~Year AllOCation ~ Population 1992 1994:2000 2012 1992~2012 20t2 : i i%change : inCrease Total Population 46,321 46,928 54,370 66,096 29.92% 19,168 Sewered 45,210 NE NE 66,096 Unsewered 1,111 NE NE 0 Source: Table SS-2, Draft Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan, May 1996, pg. 3-87. The County allocation addresses years 1994 and 2000 (rather than years 1996- 2001) in order to comply with a Puget Sound Growth Hearings Board order. Therefore, the City has projected service area population figures for years 1996 and 2001 based on the County forecast. (Table SS-3) 7"Executive Summaw", City of Bremerton Sewer Comprehensive Plan, October 1991, p. 10. Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 46 Capital Facilities Program Sanitary Sewer Table SS-3 Future Need: Sanitary Sewer Time Period Demand Capacity Average Daily (Population in City-County (Population) Demand ~ 100 GPCD Service Area) (MGD) Six-Year Need 1996 Service Area Population 52,762 58,000 5.28 1997-2001 New Population 2,128 3,110 0.21 Total 2001 Sewered Population = 54,890 3,110 5.49 Twenty-Year Need 2001-2012 New Population (4) 11,206 (8,096) 1.12 Total 2012 Sewered Population = 72,077 (14,077) 7.21 Total 1996-2012 Increase = 19,315 (4,986) 1.93 Notes: For the purposes of this projection, it is assumed that all persons within the service area will connect to the sewer system by year 2001. d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements The Wastewater Plan was developed for an ultimate service area population of 80,610. Therefore, planned improvements will be adequate to serve the projected 72,077 sewered population, provided there are no major industrial hookups. The City is participating in a feasibility study to sewer Gorst and the industrial properties in the vicinity of the Port of Bremerton and Anderson Creek. Sewering all or a portion of these areas utilizing Bremerton's treatment facility are included as options. The results of this study may affect the need and timing for treatment plant expansion. e. Plans of Other Providers The Kitsap County Public Works Department Wastewater Division is in the process of preparing a County-Wide Wastewater Facility Plan. The draft plan integrates the individual wastewater plans within the county, and includes recommendations for expanding county facilities to serve projected needs. f. Proposed Facilities The City's Wastewater Plan recommends four types of improvements at the treatment plant to accommodate projected sewage flows at ultimate plan service area development and to solve some current and anticipated operational problems: Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 47 Capital Facilities Program Sanitary Sewer · Infrastructure improvements -- repairs or replacements of existing sewer system facilities to restore structural integrity; · Regulatory requirements -- improvements needed as a result of new or modified codes, guidelines, or laws initiated from federal, state, and local government; · Growth and system extensions --improvements resulting from new development or system extensions; · Other system improvements -- recommendations that contribute to the improved operation or function of the system but are not a result of infrastructure needs, regulations, or system growth. The Utility will acquire properties in the vicinity of the wastewater treatment facility for future plant expansion and buffer for odor management. The City will be conducting a study for reuse of wastewater treatment plant effluent. The purpose of the study is to determine the feasibility of reusing effluent for industrial use or land application. If feasible alternatives for reuse are identified, the City may pursue these alternatives toward implementation. The combined sewer overflow reduction program will continue over the next six years. The program includes completion of Callow Avenue Basin Priority 1 & 2 during 1997 and 1998. Reduction of overflows in the Anderson Cove Basin will begin with completion of an engineering report in 1997. This will be followed by final design and construction in phases from 1998 though 2001. Smaller projects will be undertaken throughout the system to reduce combined sewer overflows as they are identified. These projects may include pipe rerouting, combined sewer storage, and overflow structure modifications. 4. Six-Year Financial Plan It is estimated that the existing sanitary sewer system has a total capacity of 8 million gallons per day (mgd), with approximately 3 mgd available capacity, which is sufficient to meet the total need of 5.49 mgd through the next six years, provided there are no major new industrial demands. (This assumes removal of stormwater from the system over the next several years under the City's CSO Reduction Plan.) The six-year financial plan for sanitary sewer facilities is included in Section K of this CFP. It is a summary of the City's Six Year (1996-2001) Wastewater Capital Improvement Plan. Improvements are shown to be primarily Utility financed through 2002, assuming no grants will be available. Of the Non-Utility financed projects, most of the growth-related improvements are anticipated to be financed by special utility local improvement districts (ULIDs) or by developers directly. It is anticipated that roughly 20 percent of the expenditures beyond 2000 will be funded by non-utility sources of revenue. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 48 Capital Facilities Program G. Schools Bremerton School District #100C is located on the Kitsap Peninsula between Port Orchard Bay, Dyes Inlet and Sinclair Inlet. The District is adjacent to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, and its enrollment is directly related to the military population at the base. (See Figure CF-8 Bremerton School District) The Bremerton School District provides public education in most parts of the City. The exception is a small area in the vicinity of the Bremerton Watershed, which is served by South Kitsap School District #402. The Jackson Park Naval Reservation is jointly served by the Bremerton School District and Central Kitsap Public School District #401. Only the Bremerton School District is included in this Capital Facilities Program, since such a small fraction of city residents is served by the South Kitsap School District, and no school facilities operated by that district are located within the city limits. 1. Inventory of Existing Facilities -- Schools The Bremerton School District has seven elementary schools, one middle school, one junior high school and one high school plus an alternative high school, the District also administers a vocational skills center that serves six other school districts. The current grade configuration in the District is based on grades K-5, elementary; grades 6-7, middle school; grades 8-9, junior high; and grades 10-12, high school. The following table lists the Bremerton School District's schools and their enrollment capacity. (Table SC-l) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 50 Capital Facilities Program E. Schools Table SC-1 Inventory of Existing Facilities -- Bremerton School District School II Location I Existing Student Capacity Elementary Schools (Grades K-5) Armin Jahr 800 Dibb 481 Crownhill 1537 Bertha Ave. 528 Kitsap Lake 1111 Carr Blvd. 550 Naval Avenue 900 Olympic 484 Olympic View 2442 Perry 486 View R[~dge 3220 Wheaton Way 528 West Hills 520 National Ave So. 528 Total Elementary Permanent Facilities = 3,585 Total Elementary Interim (Portable) Facilities = 250 Total Elementary Permanent and Interim Facilities = 3,835 MiddlelJr. High SChools (Grades :6,9): ~ Mountain View Middle School 2400 Perry Ave. 810 Bremerton Jr. High 1300 E. 30th 1,115 Total Middle/Jr. High Permanent Facilities = 1,925 Total Middle/Jr. High Interim (Portable) Facilities = 115 Total Middle/Jr. High Permanent and Interim Facilities = 2,040 Bremerton High School JJ 1500 13th 1,275 Total Senior High School Permanent Facilities = 1,275 Total Senior High Interim (Portable) Facilities = 115 Total Senior High School Permanent and Interim Facilities = 1,390 Source: Bremerton School District No. 100C, 4/97. 2. Forecast of Future Needs -- Bremerton School District a. Existing Demand -- Enrollment and Capacity There were 6,463 students enrolled in Bremerton School District schools in 1996. Existing enrollment is shown in Table SC-3 (column 2). Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 51 Capital Facilities Program E. Schools b. Level of Service (LOS) The Bremerton School District has established the standard size for schools as 550 for elementary, 1,000 for middle school/jr, high, and 1,250 for senior high. The overall student to teacher ratio is set at 24 for elementary students and 32 for secondary schools. However, the district is concerned that the use of average classroom size as a standard may be misleading, since classroom size varies by program and contract provisions. The data for middle/junior high and senior high schools overstate the actual capacity of those schools because they are not adjusted for the "utilization" or "efficiency" factor that represents classrooms not in use during some periods of instruction. These factors typically reduce the theoretical capacities listed below by 10 to 15 percent. (Tab/e SC-2) : : Level of Service: ,. Bremerton SChoOl District Measu~e ,Elementary MiddleljrlHi~h seni°r High i School Size (Students) 550 1,000 1,250 Classroom Size 24 32 32 Sources: Bremerton School District, 10/94; Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Part I1: Capital Facilities Plan, 12/23/96 c. Future Demand -- Enrollment Projections The need for new schools is based on projected school enrollment. The Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) provides enrollment projections based on the "Cohort Survival Method? The school district considers the SPI system useful, but inadequate to represent the unique growth conditions of the Bremerton district. For example, 1992 enrollment forecasts based on SPI projections predicted a school population of 8,370 in 1994 --2,185 higher than actual 1994 enrollment. The largest single factor in Bremerton enrollment has historically been the fluctuation in naval population, which can be difficult to predict very far in advance. Table SC-3 compares current and future enrollment to the enrollment capacity of the Bremerton School District. The enrollment data (column 2) was derived from population forecasts provided by Kitsap County used to develop the County's Comprehensive Plan (which are based on official forecasts by the Office of Financial Management, State of Washington). 8 The Cohort Survival Method uses historic patterns of student progression by grade level to measure the portion of students moving from one grade level up to the next higher cohort or grade. This ratio or survival rate is used in conjunction with current birth rates as a base for state-wide enrollment projections. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 52 Capital Facilities Program E, Schools The existing capacity (columns 3 and 4) is taken from Table SC-l, and includes existing permanent and portable facilities. The net reserve or deficiency is the difference between enrollment and capacity. The net reserve or deficiency in permanent facilities (column 5) is calculated by subtracting enrollment from permanent capacity (column 3 minus column 2). The net reserve or deficiency in all facilities (column 6) is calculated by subtracting enrollment from both permanent and interim capacity (add columns 3 and 4, then subtract column 2). If capacity is less than enrollment, the district has a "reserve" that can accommodate future enrollment. If capacity is less than enrollment, the district has a "deficiency" which can be addressed by adding capacity (see Table SC-4) or by changing the standard for level of service as part of the annual amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. ~ Bremerton SChoOl District caPacitY Requirements: (1 ) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Net reserve or deficiencies Net reserve or Permanent permanent deficiencies all Time Period Enrollment Capacity Interim Capacity facilities facilities Elementaw Schools (K-5) 1996 Actual 2,938 3,585 250 647 897 1996-2002: Growth 722 -722 -722 Total as of 2002 3,660 3,585 250 -75 175 Capacity Projects - None Scheduled ** Middle/Jr. High Schools (6-9) 1996 Actual 1,836 1,925 115 89 248 1996-2002: Growth 220 -220 -220 Total as of 2002 2,056 1,925 115 -131 28 Capacity Projects - None Scheduled ** Senior High Schools (10-12) 1996 Actual 1,689 1,275 115 -414 -229 1996-2002: Growth 30 -30 -30 Total as of 2002 1,719 1,275 115 -444 -329 Capacity Projects - None Scheduled ** "The capacity deficiency does not equal or exceed the capacity of an additional school. No new school for this grade level is included in the District's 6-year Capital Facilities Plan. A replacement or modernization is required. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 53 Capital Facilities Program E. Schools d. Plans of Other Providers The Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Element projects facility needs for all school districts in the County, including the Bremerton School District. This element is a valuable resource for comparing class size, school size, construction costs, etc. between districts. 3. Proposed Facilities a. Elementary School Capacity Requirements Through the year 2002, the Bremerton School District will not need any additional permanent space for elementary students. Some existing space does require replacement or modernization. b. Middle School/Junior High School Capacity Requirements Through the year 2002, the Bremerton School District will need additional permanent space for 131 middle school/junior high school students. Since this capacity deficiency does not equal or exceed the capacity of an additional middle school or junior high school, the District does not include a new middle/junior high school in its capital facilities plan through the 2002-03 school year. Some existing space does require replacement or modernization. c. Senior High School Capacity Requirements By the year 2002, the Bremerton School District will need permanent space for 444 senior high school students. Since this capacity deficiency does not equal or exceed the capacity of an additional senior high school, the District does not include a new senior high school in its capital facilities plan through the 2002-03 school year. d. Non-Capacity Requirements This analysis of capacity does not address the need to modernize or replace existing facilities, but the District has determined the need for such capital projects, and they are included in the capital improvements projects and financing plan listed below. (Table SC-4) 4. Six-Year Financial Plan The Six-Year Financial Plan for Schools is included in Section K. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - ,54 Capital Facilities Program H. Stormwater Stormwater facilities are provided by the Bremerton Department of Public Works & Utilities. The Stormwater Utility was formed by ordinance in 1994 as a funding source for the stormwater program mandated by the Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan. The mission of the Program is to control flooding, enhance water quality, and protect sensitive habitat areas and local aquifers. A draft Stormwater Management Plan was prepared during 1995 & 1996 and is expected to be adopted in 1997. The City's stormwater service area is the City limits. There are 14 drainage basins located within the developed portions of Bremerton. These drainage basins closely conform to the limits of the sewer basins identified in the City's Wastewater Comprehensive Plan. Additional drainage basins within the Utility Owned Lands are also within the service area. 1. Inventory of Existinq Facilities With the exception of a few more recent developments, the existing drainage system within the City can be characterized as a conveyance system of surface drainage swales and a series of pipes which collect and route drainage away from homes and businesses as shown Exhibit 4-1. The City has a storm drainage system with partial sewage separation. The City's adopted Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Reduction Plan will separate stormwater from the existing sewage collection system and limit CSOs to no more than one per year. A number of natural drainage facilities exist in the Bremerton drainage system. These natural systems include swales, channels, creeks, ravines, and natural drainage ways that discharge directly to marine waters. The City is responsible for maintaining three detention facilities. These facilities are located near Loxie Eagans Blvd. & Arsenal Way, Oyster Bay Avenue & Loxie Eagans, and Ridgetop Circle & Monticola Drive (Holly Terrace West Addition). The City's stormwater conveyance system consists of approximately 52 miles of pipes ranging for 8" to 54" in diameter. An estimated 60% of the sanitary sewer system is composed of combined sewers which carry sanitary and stormwater flows. Bremerton currently has 14 developed drainage basins. The basins include those areas outside of the City limits that drain into the City and contribute runoff to some of the City's localized drainage problems. The City's stormwater basin area is 8,564 acre feet. The majority of undeveloped Utility Owned Land is not included in this inventory. (Table SW-~) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 56 Capital Facilities Program Stormwater Table SW-1 Inventory of Capital Facilities: Storm Water Basins Basin Name Location - D, ,rainage Acres 1. Anderson Avenue N shores of W. Brem. - Port Wn. Narrows 400 2. Callow Avenue Central W. Brem. - Sinclair Inlet 850 3. Cherry Avenue E. Brem. NE of Warren Ave. Bridge - Por~ Wn. Narrows 250 4. East Park E. Brern. S of Sylvan Way - Port Wn. Narrows 330 5. Kitsap Lake W. Brem surrounding Kitsap Lake - Chico Bay 1,550 6. Oyster Bay NW part of W. Brem - Oyster Bay & Ostrich Bay 1,575 7. Pacific Avenue SE part ofW. Brem incl. Ferry Terminal- Sinctair Inlet 150 8. Phinney Bay N central part ofW. Brem - Phinney Bay 225 9. Pine Road W part of E. Brem. - Port Wn. Narrows 680 10. Sinclair Park SW portion of W. Brem - 1,400 11. Stevens Canyon E. Brem. in vicinity of W. heaton/Sylvan - Port Wn. Narrows 350 12. Tracyton Beach Along W. edge of city limits in E. Brem - Port Wn. Narrows 60 13. Trenton Avenue E part of E. Brem - Port Wn. Narrows & Port Orchard Bay 670 14. Warren Avenue Downtown Bremerton - Port Wn. Narrows 275 Total = 8,565 Source: City of Bremerton Draft Stormwater Management Plan. 2. Forecast of Future Needs a, Existing Demand Water Quality -- The City of Bremerton established a policy requiring detention facilities on development projects in 1980. The guidelines for sizing these facilities limited the runoff rate to 0.2 CFS/acre based on a 25-year storm event. Since 1994, the City has required all development to meet the requirements of the "Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin". Conveyance -- A complete analysis has not been performed on the City's existing storm drainage system to determine the capacity of the components. This analysis will be conducted over the next five years as part of the proposed drainage basin assessments. b. Level of Service (LOS) Water Quality -- Development projects must meet the requirements of the "Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin", which includes Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 57 Capital Facilities Program Stormwater providing water quality enhancement for 6-month, 24-hour storm and stream bank erosion control by releasing one-half of the predeveloped 2-year/24-hour duration rate during a 2-year/24-hour duration event, and matching predeveloped 10-year and 100-year/24 -hour duration runoff rates. Construction sites are also required to provide erosion and sedimentation controls for up to the 2-year storm event. Conveyance -- Storm systems constructed as part of the City's CSO Reduction Plan will be designed to handle a 25-year storm. The City will be conducting drainage basin assessments as part of the storm water program. These assessments will include the identification of storm drainage conveyance system capacities. Based on the outcome of these assessments, a recommended level of service will be determined for existing systems. The drainage problems identified in the storm water capital program are based on conditions observed in the field and represent conveyance problems that occur annually. c. Future Demand Water Quality -- Development will be required to meet the Level of Service requirements defined above. Regional water quality facilities maybe identified in future drainage basin assessments. Conveyance -- The impact of additional impervious surfaces from development on the conveyance system will be mitigated by the limitations to the runoff rate to 0.2CFS/acre based on a 25-year storm. d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements The City's CSO Reduction Plan identifies construction of separate stormwater conveyance systems in the majority of the City's drainage basins. These improvements will address most of the drainage problems identified. The City's Draft Stormwater Management Plan identified three capital projects, not included in the CSO Reduction Plan, necessary to improve conveyance system capacity. e. Plans of Other Providers The City and Kitsap County share responsibility for a number of drainage basins. The water quality standards of the City and Kitsap County are consistent. Coordination between the City and Kitsap County will required regarding the downstream conveyance systems within these basins. 3. Proposed Facilities Improvements The Draft Stormwater Plan identifies eleven existing flooding problems and recommends solutions to alleviate these problems. Many of these drainage problems will be reduced or eliminated by CSO sewer separation projects. A few will be addressed during annual maintenance. (Table SW-2) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 58 Capital Facilities Program Stormwater TableSW,2 Major Flood COntrol Capital lmProvemen,t Projects and Costs Project # Basin Project Cost (1994 $) CIP #1 Sinclair Park Upgrade piping and detention at Kean and Rogers St. 851,000 CIP #2 Stevens Canyon Piping improvements at Robin and Dibb Streets 170,000 CIP #3 Pacific Avenue Pipi0g ,improvements along, Park Avenue, 5th St to Burwell 250,000 Total = 1,271,000 Source: Draft Stormwater Management Plan The Draft Stormwater Plan identifies a number of small capital projects that need to be performed on an annual basis. The Draft Plan recommends that the City needs to implement a series of storm drainage improvements over a multi-year planning period, and develop an effective City-wide inspection and maintenance program. (Table SW-2) 4. Six-Year Financial Plan The six-year financial plan for stormwater facilities is included in Section K. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - ,59 Capital Facilities Program Stormwater : ~ ~ ~--I--- o 1- - ~-- -=-"~ - I · ~' ~ ~ _~ -~. ...~ I : 2-: ".' . U ~ ...... :_. :'. f - :(. -- ~= , ~-'( Figure CF-9 Bremerton Stormwater Drainage Basins Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 60 Capital Facilities Program I. Transportation This section is a summary of information contained in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 1. Inventory of Existing Facilities Bremerton's transportation system generally consists of streets, highways, sidewalks, ferries, and public transit. The Transportation Element includes the following information on existing facilities: Streets and Highways · Principal Arterials (See Transportation Element Table 1) · Minor Arterials (See Transportation Element Table 1) · Collector Arterials (See Transportation Element Table 1) · Residential Streets (Not inventoried) Mass Transit · Kitsap Transit (See Transportation Element pg. 20) · Washington State Ferries: Bremerton-Seattle (See Transportation Element pg. 20) · Horluck Transportation Co.: Bremerton-Port Orchard (See Transportation Element pg. 20) Source: Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element"F" 2. Forecast of Future Needs -- Level of Service (LOS) Standard Levels of Service (LOS) is an estimate of the quality and performance of transportation facility operations in a community. The Transportation Element measures LOS by calculating the volume to capacity ratio (V/C) of the midblock of a roadway, using a range from A (free flow) to F (stop-and-go traffic). (a) Current Level of Service Almost all roadways in the City function at or better than LOS D. The following existing roadway sections exceed or are close to exceeding a Level of Service D (Volume/Capacity Ratio .90) threshold during the PM peak hour: Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 6'~ Capital Facilities Program Transportation Table TRi2 EXiStin Level of service ~ Transportation street section ViC Ratio LOS Burwell Warren to Naval 0.77 D SR 304 Preble to Farragut 0.91 E Kitsap Way Callow to SR3 0.87 D Manette Bridge 0.89 D Warren 11th to Bridge 0.8 D Warren (Wheaton) Bridge to Callahan 0.99 E Source: Table 1 -- Existing Corridor Level of Service, Transportation Element (b) Recommended Level of Service (LOS) The Transportation Element establishes the following level of service threshold standards: · Arterial Streets -- LOS D or better (v/c less than or equal to 0.9), with the exception of the following: · Wheaton/Warren Corridor -- Maximum LOS F with VIC threshold of 1.06 · Kitsap Way Corridor -- Maximum LOS E or better (VIC less than or equal to 1.00 · Manette Bridge -- Maximum LOS E or better (V/C less than or equal to 1.00) The higher threshold in the above three corridors allows time to develop strategies to address the corridor transportation needs. Transportation projects in these corridors will have a goal to obtain a LOS D. 3. Six-year Financial Plan The six-year financial plan for transportation facilities is included in Section K of this Capital Facilities Program. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 62 Capital Facilities Program Transportation O$TPJC~ 1750 3500 SCALE JH FEET ........ c~c~s Figure CF-'I0 Bremerton Arterial System Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 63 Capital Facilities Program J. Water The City of Bremerton Water Utility provides potable water for Bremerton and the surrounding area. A complete inventory, analysis of need, and capital facilities program is provided in the 1992 City of Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan (also known as the Bremerton Water Plan) adopted by the Washington State Department of Health in 1993 and the Bremerton City Council in 1994. The next update of the Bremerton Water Plan is required by 1999. 1. Inventory of Existing Facilities (a) Service Area The Utility services approximately 58,000 residents in Bremerton (38,000) and portions of Kitsap County (20,000), including the Gorst area and the western portion of the Manette Peninsula. The service area includes the Olympic View Industrial Park and the Bremerton National Airport. The Utility also is under contract to provide water to the Tracyton and Rocky Point Water Districts. In addition, the Utility contracts to supply water to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) and to the City of Port Orchard. The current service area includes approximately 5,300 acres within the Bremerton City limits, and approximately 6,800 acres within unincorporated Kitsap County. (See Figure CF-? ? "'Bremerton Water Plan Service Area".) The Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan contains an Interlocal Agreement for Establishing Water Utility Service Area Boundaries, but this agreement has not yet been submitted by Bremerton. (b) Facilities/Water Rights The City of Bremerton Water Utility supply system consists of Union River Reservoir behind the Casad Dam, 12 wells, 204 miles of water pipe, fourteen pressure reducing stations, 16 water storage reservoirs, and 14 pump and booster stations. (Table WA-l) Approximately 60 percent of the supply comes from the 2,764 acre Union River watershed, which is 98 percent owned and controlled by the City. Wells in several local aquifers supply groundwater to the system. Current average daily demand is approximately 8 million gallons per day (MGD). There are six pressure zones in the system: East (E) 240, E 398 E 490, West (W) 256, W 440, and W 517. These zones are designated by the overflow elevations in Utility reservoirs. Plans are being made for two additional pressure zones (W540 and W650). Bremerton's water supplies consist of 10,689 primary acre-feet (1,408 supplementary acre-feet) of groundwater and a firm yield from the Union River of 3.8 MGD. Instantaneous rights include 40 cubic feet per second (cfs) (17,952 gpm) on the Union River watershed and 6350 gallons per minute (gpm) groundwater. All water in use by the City has been properly appropriated through certificates of water rights or claims. Historically used surface water Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 64 Capital Facilities Program Water claims are maintained for potential emergency and future use pending required treatment. Bremerton's Union River surface source is of such excellent quality that the City is currently approved by the State Department of Health to remain unfiltered. Sources are disinfected with chlorine. The water system control and alarm is provided through a telemetry system. Updates to the telemetry system are planned for 1997-99, including conversion to radio telemetry. Operation staff are state certified, and the system is operated in compliance with all federal and state regulations. (Table WA-l) (c) Fire Flows The Utility is generally capable of meeting Kitsap County Ordinance fireflows, which are considered to be minimums for new construction. However the Bremerton Water Plan recommends that fireflows be designed to meet the significantly higher Insurance Services (ISO) Standards. Under peak hourly flow conditions, a minimum of 30 psi (new mains) residual system pressure without fire flows in water mains should be maintained to meet State Department of Health standards. (d) Capacity The current capacity of the water system on an annual average is 12 million gallons per day (MGD). The daily capacity of the system with groundwater sources only is 8.7, while the capacity with groundwater and surface sources at current hydraulic capability is 21.5 MGD. The capacity varies because the Union River is used to supply the average day demands of the system. The surface supply can be varied between zero and 15.5 MGD as long as annual average firm yield of 3.8 MGD and water quality limits are not exceeded. Note that not all sources can be used to maximum capacity at the same time, due to limited hydraulic capacity of the transmission mains or water right conditions. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 65 Capital Facilities Program Water _ Table WA-1 r , Inventory of Capital Facilities: Water Supply Facilities J Address I Capacity Surface Water Hydrau!ic Capacity MGD): / Union River I Watershed 15.5 Surface Water Subtotal = 15.50 GroundWater' Capacity (gpm) 1. #2-R - Anderson Creek Well 2380 Anderson Hill Rd SW 800 2. #3 - Anderson Creek Well 2380 Anderson Hill Rd SW 400 3, #7 - Anderson Creek Well 2731 State Highway 16 450 4. #-8 - Anderson Creek Well 2651 State Highway 16 650 5. #9 - Bridle Ridge We.!l 318 NW Firway Lane 230 6. #13 ~ Vena Well 50 NE Vena Avenue 600 7. #14 - East Zone 240 Well 5853 Central Valley Road NE 270 8. #15 - Pistol Range Well 6581 W, Old Belfair Highway 150 9. #17 o Pistol Range Well 6581 W. Old Belfair H!ghway 760 10. #18 - Twin Lakes Well 8301 W. Old Belfair Highway 370 11. #19 - Golf Course Well 7061 W. Old Belfair HighwaY 300 12. #20 - Twin Lakes Well 8301 W. Old Belfair Highway 1,100 13. #21 - Silverdale Mobile Home Estates Well 903 NE Saturn Lane (500) (pending application) ...... Future productio,n = 14. Gorst Well (pending application) Old Belfair Highway (400) Future product!on = Current Groundwater Sub-Total (gpm) = 6,080,00 Current Groundwater Sub-Total (MGp) = 8.70 ; , pUmPing CapacitY,, , (gPm). 15. PS #1 - Gorst Creek (emergency supply only) Belfair Valley Road - Gorst Creek N/A 16. PS #2 - Anderson Creek 2380 Anderson Hill Road 2,250 17. PS #3 (not in use) .... 7061 ,Belfa!r,Valley Road .... 400 18. PS ¢4 1335 Jones St:, (West Brem.) 800 19. PS #11 844 Catlahan Drive 1,400 20. PS #12 3029 OI,.ympus Drive ,,,950 21. PS #13 2929 Olympus Drive 500 22. PS #14 2101 Schley Blvd 825 23. P~ #16 50 NE Vena Ave 1,250 24. PS #17 Old Belfair Hw~ 1,,500 Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 66 Capital Facilities Program Water Table WA-1 Inventory of Capital Facilities: Water Supply Facilities I Address Capacity Pump Station Sub-Total = 9,875.00 Booster'Pump Stations Pump!,n(,] Capacity (gpm) 25. Booster Station #2 (backup only) 3201 Sixth Street 300 26. Booster Station #3 3000 17th Street 300 27. Booster Station #.4 3301 First Street 100 28. Booster Station #5 589 Lebo BIvd 1,000 Booster Pump Stations Sub-Total = 1,700.00 Pump Stations Total = 11,575.00 ·. ,.~t°~'e Capacity (MG) 29. Union River Reservoir Union River Watershed 1,350 31. Res. #22 McKenna Fails 0.1 32. Anderson Creek #1 - Abandoned Anderson Creek Watershed N/A 33. Anderson Creek #2 - Abandoned Anderson Creek Watershed N/A Reservoirs (Raw Water) Total = 1,350.10 34. Reservoir ~ 4801 Roosevelt Blvd 11.0 35. Reservoir #5 3200 First Street (Forest Ridge Park) 3.0 36. Reservoir #6 5144 Francis Street @ Eden Road 0.15 37. Reservoir #8 7300 Werner Road 2.54 38. Reservoir #10 5785 Imperial Way SW, Pt. Orchard- 0.21 Port of Brem. Industrial Park 39. Reservoir #11 844 Callahan Drive 1.58 40. Reservoir #12 ,3,029,01y, mp,u,s Drive 2.0 41. Reservoir #13 2929 Olympus Drive 0.80 42. Reservoir#14 1628 Hayward Avenue,@,,E. 17th , 2.0 43. R,eservoir #15 1925 Cheryl Street @ Forest Drive 1.0 44. Reservoir #16 260 Sugarpine - Tracyton Watershed 1.0 45. Reservoir #17 400 Ridge Lane NE @ Sandra Lane 1.0 46. Reservoir #18 1925 NE Cheryl Street @ Forest Dr. 1.0 47. Reservoir #19 2628 Ash Street @ Cherry Ave 2.0 48. Reservoir #20 400 Ridge L, ane' ,NE @ Sandra Lane 1.0 49. Reservoir #21 2132 Lakeh,u, rs! Drive - NAD Park 3.0 Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 67 Capital Facilities Program Water Table WA-1 ,, Inventory of Capital Facilities: Water Supply Facilities .I Address Capacity Distribution Reservoir Total = 33.28 Transmission Main Piping! ......... Capacity (Fe,,et) 12" - 36" Water Mains I Various 201,148 Transmission M, ain Pi,ping = 201,148.00 Bistribufion Piping System capacity (Feet): 2" - 12" Water Mains Various 1,211,729 10" Water Mains Various 43,945 8" Water Mains Various 387,816 6" Water Mains Various 411,758 4" Water Mains Various 155,653 3" Water Mains Various 14,533 2" Water Mains Various 91,344 Distribution Piping System Sub-Total = 1,211,729.00 Total Piping System = 1,412,877.00 2. Forecast of Future Needs (a) Existing Demand The average daily water system demand varies depending on weather conditions, but averages about 8.1 million gallons per day (MGD). Year Average Day Demand (MGD) 1990 9.35 1991 8.71 1992 8.48 1993 7.73 1994 8.29 1995 7.89 1996 7.43 Approximately 33 percent of the average daily demand comes from the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, the largest single water user. Approximately 78 percent of the water demand is "in-City" demand, and 22 percent is outside the city limits. Average day demand is affected by the year's rain patterns and other factors -- for example, 1993 was a wet summer, resulting in less outside water use. However, the highest peak day ever recorded was during unusually Iow Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 68 Capital Facilities Program Water temperatures in December 1990 when pipes broke and customers ran water to prevent pipes from freezing. In 1992, Seattle's drought response media campaign affected Bremerton customers' water use, even though our reservoir was not experiencing a drought. (b) Level of Service (LOS) Standard The estimated 1990 LOS is 106 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The City's Conservation Program" is expected to reduce domestic unit consumption by 3% by 1995, to 103 gpcd and by 6% by year 2000, to 100 gpcd. Domestic unit demands are then expected to remain constant through the year 2014. · Current LOS = 106 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). · Recommended LOS = 100 GPCD. (c) Future Demand The Bremerton Water Plan identifies needs for a 20 year planning period from 1990 to 2010. During that time it is expected that supply capacity to meet typical maximum day demands (MDD) will increase 26.99 mgd by year 2010. (Table WA-2) The Water Plan demand projections were based on outdated population forecasts derived from a variety of sources, including past trends, the Kitsap County Department of Community Development, and the former Puget Sound Council of Governments (PSCOG). Although the projections were not based on the Kitsap Regional Planning Council (KRPC) population forecast and subarea allocations, the KRPC allocations fall within the Iow to high range used to forecast water system demand. Existing and potential Water SupPly Water Source : DailY SUPPLY (mgd) : : Annual SuPPly (ac,fi) Existing Sources 9.1 - 23.7 13,460 - 16,565 Potential Sources 11.0- 12.2 7,470 Total Sources 20.1 - 35.9 20,930 - 24,035 Source: Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan Table 8-7 It is projected that if pending water rights certificates are secured, then no additional sources will be needed to meet the total demand through the next six years. However, future water sources will need to be secured to meet anticipated demands beyond year 2000. (Table WA-3) Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 69 Capital Facilities Program Water Table WA-3 Future Need: Water Year Demand (Population in City-County Service Avg, Day Demand Area) MGD Six-Year Need 1994 * 56,701 9.04 1995-2000 (new) 9,686 4.20 Total as of 2000 * 66,387 13.24 T~venty-Year Need 2000-2012 11,764 4.38 Total as of 2012 78,151 ,, 17.62 Sources: Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Pian, updated by Bremerton Water Utility · 1994 & 2000 demand - from Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, December 23, 1996 Assumptions: 2000: Pop. X 103 gallons/capita + 3.2 MG for PSNS 2014: Pop. X 100 gallons/capita + 3.2 MG for PSNS 3. Proposed Facility Improvements The Bremerton Water Plan recommends that an additional 0.7 mgd of groundwater supply should be developed by 1995 and a total of 1.4 mgd should be developed by year 2000. (Table WA-2) The City has two additional wells drilled and awaiting water rights. Current regulatory and legal uncertainty at the State level precludes processing of water rights applications except under emergency conditions. The Water Plan concludes that existing distribution system is capable of meeting typical system demands. Improvements in transmission and distribution mains are necessary to improve flows and pressures in certain areas and to replace undersized or sub- standard facilities. (a) Water Quality Meeting strict Federal and State water quality standards is a primary objective of the City. Drinking water is regularly tested at the sources and in the distribution system. To continue to use the unfiltered Union River source, the City should continue to pursue either acquisition or controlling agreements over remaining private lands within the watershed, and should vigorously implement the Watershed Control Plan. Responsible operation of the entire water system is critical to maintaining compliance with the non-filtration status of the surface water treatment regulations. Even with these precautions, a drastic change in source quality or changes in regulations could require the City to provide filtration. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 70 Capital Facilities Program Water lb) Storage Storage needs include the E398 zone and the Industrial Park and Airport area, no additional storage is needed to meet current demand. Adding such storage is the responsibility of the Port of Bremerton. By year 2010 a total of 22.5 million gallons (MG) of system wide storage is expected to be required. The system currently has 34.3 MG of storage available, primarily in the lower elevation zones in the developed pads of the city. Prior to year 2010, additional storage will be required to serve two new West Bremerton zones south of Kitsap Lake (W650/and south of Gorst (W540). Additional storage should also be provided north of the East Bremerton city limits. lc) Distribution System West Bremerton industrial/commercial areas have good fireflow capacity. Toward Jackson Park, fireflow capacity meets Kitsap County guidelines but is less than ISO recommendations for multi-family residential housing. Several improvements are needed to improve fireflow capacity in the East 398 Zone, west of the Brownsville Highway. Changing the shape of this long narrow zone service area by trading the northern part of the zone of the North Perry Avenue Water District in exchange for an equivalent part of their service area east of the central East Bremerton service area may be an economical way to improve service to both areas. Pump station capacity will need to be added to serve new west zones south of Kitsap Lake and south of Gorst. The Utility should continue to routinely replace small sub-standard water mains. Initial replacement projects should concentrate on mitigating Iow-pressure problems in the Sherman Heights area. The existing telemetry and control system will require upgrading and maintenance so the Utility can more efficiently control the water system. (d) Plans of Other providers There are no other providers of potable water within the City. However, there are several nearby water districts, public utility districts and municipalities that may have interests in local surface and groundwater resources. These include: Silverdale Water District No. 16; North Perry Avenue Water District; Erland Point Water District; Sunnyslope Water District; City of Port Orchard; and McCormick Woods development. An unclaimed area exists between the City Water Utility and the Erland Point Water District service areas. Unclaimed areas also exist south, east and west of the Utility's watershed. The Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), a regional water supply, transmission, and storage plan, was developed by the Water Utility Coordinating Committee (WUCC) to comply with state law. The plan assesses water supply needs in Kitsap County and presents a program to provide water supply and service to users. The plan, expected to be approved by the State Department of Health, provides a process and strategy for existing water utilities to define their role in a program consistent with adopted land use policies and projected growth strategy. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 71 Capital Facilities Program Water 4. Six-Year Financial Plan Under the proposed LOS it is projected that no additional water sources will be needed to meet the total demand through the next six years, providing water rights are secured on two wells which have already been drilled. The City pays for capital facilities through charges for service, but also through Timber Sales and other non-revenue receipts. The six-year financial plan for water facilities is included in Section K of this Capital Facilities Program. Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 72 Capital Facilities Program Water LEGEND ~ ~E~C~ WAFER BREMERTON WATER PLAN '-"' ' .... ,..,.-,-,,.,,," SERVICE AREA MAP } I '*'-"" ,.,,... Figure CF-11 Water Plan Service Area Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 73 Capital Facilities Program K. Six-Year Finance Program 1. Introduction A six-year finance program for capital facilities is one of the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The six-year finance program for all capital facilities addressed in this Capital Facilities Program (CFP) is consolidated into this section. Under the City's annual comprehensive plan review process, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and CFP are developed together by City staff. Both are based on the various plans for transportation, sewer, water, etc., which in turn are based on the City's Land Use Element. 2. Projected Revenue and Expenses The tables in this six-year finance program are excerpted from the summary tables of the CIP. Additional details are contained in the body of the CIP. The contents of the tables are as follows: Summaries · Total CIP · Water · Wastewater · Storm Water · Transportation · Engineering · Parks · Golf · General Fund · Other Funds Sources of Funding · Parks and General Government Projects Plans for Other Agencies · Bremerton School District Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 74 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM t997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY. TOTAL CIP: PRIOR 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002! SOURCES OF FUNDS General Governmental 62.0 190.8 358.2 428.8 327.6 403.7 205.7 Grants o CDBG 0.0 140.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Gmr~ . ~ 0.0 314.9 3,879.0 419.0 300.0 0.0 0.0 Wate~ 198.0 1,899.5 3,071.8 5,18g.3 3,813.5 2,55~.3 1,461.3 Wa~tawa~' 6,884.5 2,889.5 3,2~.0 1,705.0 1,641.0 1,743.0 4,943.0 Stormwat~ 0.0 128.0 70.0 150.0 67.0 60.0 50.0 G. O. Bo~da - Votad 314.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,800.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Boad~: Non-Vo~l 234.5 0.0 2,000.0 2,500.0 2,500.0 0.0 0.0 Revem~e Bonds. 0.0 0.0 2,0(X).0 10,000.0 0.0 0.0 10,550.0 Artm~ Str~,~ 101 157.6 402.7 396.0 329.5 263.0 160.0 150.0 R~ml Estate Excl~ Tax 109 0.0 377.0 204.0 50.0 1,050.0 50.0 50.0 P~ ~ Facility 112 0.0 88.0 98.0 148.0 275.5 9g.0 102.0 Pendecgaat Pa~k 308 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gold Mtn Golf ~ 407 0.0 6~3.0 113.0 116.0 11g.0 123.0 427.0 Equip. Rental Reserve 510 0.0 352.3 926.0 488.5 660.7 658.1 239.0 Roo~v~ Capital ~ 622 0.0 200.0 0.0 200.0 300.0 0.0 150.0 TIB(UATA) 1,252.5 2,965.2 3,556.5 1,230.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 64.0 176.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSDOT 624.5 338.0 200.0 159.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 45.4 2,839.1 2,196.5 1,077.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 County/State/Fed 166.5 135.0 220.0 235.5 133.0 10.0 0.0 Navy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.O Stree~ Vacation 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Othe~ 8.5 3,243.7 239.0 888.5 73.0 292.0 50.0 GRAND TOTAL 9,957.1 17,196.7 =,869.0 !25,521.5 17,13:3.3 6,165.1 18,398.0 IINFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS ! 5,993.5 I 12;95~.5 I 15,575.5 ] 21,861.5 I 6,939.0 ] 4,954.0 ] 6,363.0] [FACILITIES' PROJECTSI I I[ 2,930.5 I 3,516.6 I 5,148.2 I 4,946.5 I 10,345.0 J 854.5 I 11,425'0 J IEQUIPMENT&VEHIcLES I 657.51 1,117.21 1,810.3I 1,176.1 1 1,343.31 1,°97-sl 810.0J [GRAND TOTAL I 9,581.5 [17,592.3 I 22,534.0 I 27,984.1 I 18,~7.3 J S,90~.1 t 18,398.0 J [DIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES J 375.6 I (395'6}l 335.0 ! (2,462.6)1 (1,494.0)[ (741.0)l 0.0 I Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 75 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO(31~M 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY. WATER PRIOR 19971 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 SOURCES OF FUNDS Gene~ Gov~nmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grar~ - CDBG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gm,'~ - Other 0.0 0.0 2,835.0 315.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wate¢ 198.0 1,899.5 3,070.5 5,188.0 3,790.0 2,555.0 1,460.0 Wastewater 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Slorrnwatm' 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bof~ls - Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bonds: Non-Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Revenue Bond~. 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Arterial Stre~ 101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Real Estate Ex¢~ Tax 10g 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pml~ Capital Facility 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pendergasl Park 308 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gold Mtn Golf Course 407 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equip. RentaJ Reserve 510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 · 0.0 0.0 0.0 Roo~velt Capi~ A~se( 6'22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TIB(UATA) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WS0OT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Courtly/Stale/Fed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Naw 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 S~'e~ Vacation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL SOURCES 198.0 1,89~.5 5r905.5 5,503.0 3,790.0 2,555.0 1,460.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN98WA01 WATER SYSTEM FLUORIDATION 54.5 300.5 UTILWA18 SR//3 TRANSMISSION MAIN SYSTEM IMPROVEME 25.0 50.0 2,500.0 2,000.0 - UTILWA23 E398 ZONE TRANSMISSION MAIN & STORAGE ' . 103.0 930.0 UTILWA83 WARREN AVENUE BRIDGE MAIN UTILWA51 WEST 540 ZONE DEVELOPMENT 210.0 20.0 1,0(X).0 2,133.0 UTILWA47 WEST 650 ZONE DEVELOPMENT I I ~,o i ~.o I 1,~.o I I I I UTILWA48 RESERVOIR SEISMIC IMPROVEMENTS J I 40.0 1 2~.o I I 240.0 1 =40.0 1 ~o.o I UTILWA84 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM '1 I ~.0 I ~.0 I ~.0 I ~.0 I 250.0 I ~0.0 I UTILWA2 SILVERDALE MOBILE ESTATES WELL · 75 0 UTILWA45 DOMSEAWELL DEVELOPMENT 90.0 UTILWA72 PINE RD. MCWILLIAMS TO WELL 21 27.0 180.0 SUB-TOTAL 35.0 1,599.5 5,130.5 4,858.0 3,665.0 2,230.0 1,360.0 FACILmES PROJECTS SUB-TOTAL 2~.0 1 175.0 I 315.0 1 855.0 I 125.0 1 3~.o I loo.o I Capital Facilities Element - Pad 2 CFP - 76 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Pragram CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO<3RAM 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY. WATER EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES SUB-TOTAL J 137.0 1 ~25.0 1 12~.0 1 125.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LGRAND TOTAL I 198.0 J 1,899,5 I 5,570.5 I 5,838.0 J 3,790.0 I 2,555.0 J 1,480.0 I [OIFFERENCE SOURCES LESS USES ' I 0.0 J · 0.0 I 335.0 I (335.0)J 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 77 Capital Facilities Program C! - 'iF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROC. ~ M 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM S U M MARY - WASTE'WATER PRIOR 1997 19981 1999 2000 2001 20021 SOURCES OF J~UNDS General Govemrnental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grant~- CDBG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Grant~ - Other 0.0 0.0 104.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wastewatar 6,88~.5 2,889,5 3,26g.0 1,705,0 1,634.0 1,743.0 4,943.0 Stomtwater 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bonds - voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bonds: Non-Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Revenue Bonds. 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Aderial Slzee{ 101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Real Estate Excise Tax 109 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parks Capital Facility 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pendergast Perk 308 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gold Mtn Golf Course 407 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equip. Rental Resen, e 510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Roosevelt Capital Asset 622 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TIB(UATA) 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSDOT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 County/Slate/Fed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Naw 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Street, Vacation 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other 0.0 3,'100.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL SOURCES 6,884.5 5,989.5 3,373.0 1,705,0 1,634.0 1,743.0 4,943.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS INgTWW ANDERSON COVE BASIN CSO SEPARATION PROJ 30,0 35.0 115.0 755,0 764.0 758.0 IN98WW CSO DETENTION STRUCTURES 250.0 250.0 250.0 UTILWW I CALLOW AVENUE DRAINAGE BASIN CSO PROJ 3,522.0 4,035.0 2,059.0 400.0 3,790.0 IN97WW I WERNER ROAD SEWER EXTENSION 104.0 UTILWW ~ SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 100.0 220.0 220.0 220.0 220.0 220.0 220.0 INg8vvw INVERTED SIPHON ISOLATION VALVES 15.0 100.0 UTILWW OYSTER 8AY BASIN INTERCEPTOR 23.0 50,0 503.0 IN!~SVV~/ PORT WASHINGTON NARROWS INVERTED SIPHON 230.0 I SUB-TOTAL I 3,675.0 4,2<30.0 2,763.0 1,325.0 1,234.0 1,4:28.0 4,743.0 FACILITIES PROJECTS IUTILVV/PUMP STATIONS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 339.5 164.5 160.0 160.0 160.0 275.0 160,0 FA97¥/W WWTP PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS 1,080.0 UTILWW WW'TP FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS 25.0 80.0 UTILWW NEW ROOF ON CONTROL BUILDING 15.0 UTILWW WW'T'P ODOR CONTROL & HEADWORKS MODIFIC 2,565,0 200.0 SUB-TOTAL 2,904.5 1,444,5 200.0 240.0 160.0 :275.0 160.0 EQUII~MENT & VEHICIi. E$ UTILWW TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE 10.0 UTILWW VIBRATION ANALYSIS PACKAGE 15.0 EQ98W EMERGENCY POWER SUPPLY 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 UTILWW OIGESTER RENOVATION 60.0 UTILWW SCADA SYSTEM AND CONTROLS 250.0 150,0 150.0 50.0 :~0.0 20.0 20.0 UTILVVW VEHICLE PURCHASE 55.0 20.0 UTILWW AUTOMATIC POWER SWITCH GEAR 50.0 EQ98W WASTEWATER TREATMENT SOLIDS MANAGEMENT 170,0 UTILWW METHANE BOILER j 50.0 UTILWW BUBBLE TYPE DIFFUSERS IN THE AERATION BASIN 20,0 200.0 I SUB-TOTAL I 305.0 255.0 410~0 140.0 240.0 40.0 40.0 Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 78 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1997 - 201]2 PROGRAM SUMMARY - WASTE'WATER ! IORANO TOTAL 6,884.5 5,989.5 3,373.0 1 ~,70~.0 1 ~,63~.0 1 4,743.0 j 4,9~.3.0 j lO,F.~eRe~ce SOURCES LeSS USeS I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.01 Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 79 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY - STORM WATER 'PRIOR 1997 1998 1999 20(X) 2001 SOURCES OF FUNDS ~ Govemmentel 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grants. COBG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grarffs - Othe¢ 0.0 0.0 430.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wastewat~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stom~watm' 0.0 128.0 70.0 150.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 G.O. Bood~ - VD(ed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bor~ls: No~.Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RJvenue Bonds. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Arterial Stre~ 101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Real Estate F..xctse Tax 109 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parks Capital Facility 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pendergast Park 308 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gold Mtn Go~' Course 407 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equip. Rental Reserve 510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Roo~avelt Capitat Ass~ 622 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TIB(UATA) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSDOT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Co~ntyIState/Fed (EDA) 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Navy' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Str~ VacaOo~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Oth~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 TOTAL SOURCES 0.0 128.0 500.0 150.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS STORM03 ~STORM DRAINAGE MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60,0 SUB-TOTAL 0.0 128.0 500.0 150.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 lGRANOTOTAL I 0.01 .~2,.01 ~.01 ~SO.01 ~o.01 r,O.01 "0.01 [DIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES [ 0,01 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0l 0.0 I 0,0 I 0.0 I Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 80 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Pr;>gram CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY - TRANSPORTATION ,, 'PRIOR "19971 1998i 1999 2000 2CO1 2002 souF~c~ oF F~NDS General Governmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gtanf~ - CDBG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grant- - Other 0.0 0.0 260.0 10.4,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Walm' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Was~ewate~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stomwvater 0.0 O.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 G.O. Bond~ - Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bonds; Non-Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Revenue Bends. 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 O.0 O.0 0.0 Acterial Street 101 157,6 401.7 396.0 329.5 263.0 160.0 150.0 Real Est,ale Excise Tax 109 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 P~ks Capita{ Facility 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pendergast Park 308 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gold Mtn Goll' Course 407 0.0 · 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equip. Rental Reserve 510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Roosevelt Capital Aa.set 6'22 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TIB 1,252.5 2,965.2 3,556.5 1,250.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 64.0 176.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSDOT 624.5 338.0 200.0 159.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 45.4 2,839.1 2,196.5 1,077.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CountylStateJFed 166.5 135.0 220.0 235.5 133.0 10.0 0,0 Navy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stree{ Vacation 8.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other 8,5 143.7 239.0 18.5 40.0 275.0 0.0 TOTAL,,,SOURCES 2,263.5 6,822.7 7,13,2:0 3,350.9 436.0 445.0 150.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS TRANS4 l SYLVAN WAY OVERLAY - OLYMPUS TO WHEATON I 20.0 ] 20,~ .0 TRANS6 IKJTSAPWAY RECONSTRUCT-WESLON TO AUTO I 55,0{ 8SC.0 I 20.0 TRANS7 JSR3/SR304 BREMERTON FERRY TERMINAL TO GO~ 2,200.0 I 5,57c,7 I 6,243.0 I 4,704.5 I 1,600.0 ] 78~.0 I TRANS5 IWARREN AVENUE SOUTHBOUND OFFRAMP TO CALLAHAN I r>4.0 176.0 INg7AS0tlKEAN & UNION IMPROVEMENTS I I 120.0 33.0 TRANS8I$R303 CORRIDOR - MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDY I ] I 150.0 300.0 150.0 SUB-TOTAL [ 2,283.5I 8,8~.7 7,132.0 5,478.5 I 1,930.0 [ 1,186.0 I 150.0 GRANOTOTAL '"l 2'283'5l 6,8:22'71 7'i32'01 5,478:5 I 1,930.0 [ 1'186.0 I 150.0] [OIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES J (20.O)J 0.0 I 0.0 [' (2,i~7.6)J {i,494.0)1 (741.01[ 0.0 J Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 8'1 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY. ENGINEERING PRIOR 1997 199~ 1999 2000 2001 2002 SOURCES OF FUND,~ General Governmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grants - CDBG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grants - Other 0.0 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 warm- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W~st. ewater 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stoo'rwvate¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bonds - Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bonds: Non-Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Revenue Bo~ls. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Adedal Stree1101 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Real E~tate Excise Tax 109 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parks Capital Facility 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pendergast Park 308 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gokl Mtn Go~f Course 407 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equip. Rental Reserve 510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 R~ve~l Capital Asset 622 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TIB(UATA) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSOOT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 County/State/Fed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Navy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stree~ Vac~tk~n 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL SOURCES 0.0 15.g 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES SUB-TOTAL 0.0 15.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IGRANO TOTAL I o.o I lS.91 o.o I o.o I o.o I o.o I o.o I IOIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES j 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 82 Capital Facilities Program CITY "~ BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRA~ 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY - PARKS PRIOR 1997! lg°~ 1999 2000 2001 2002 'SOURCES OF FUNDS Gef~'al Governmental 0.0 34.5 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grants - CDBG 0.0 80.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Gran(J, - Ol~ef 0.0 300.0 2,50.0 0.0 300.0 0.0 0.0 Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W~ewalef 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~ Stormwater 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 i G.O. Bond~ - Voled 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,600.0 0.0 0.0 ~ G.O. 8ond.~: NomVmed 0.0 0.0 2,000.0 2,500.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Revenue BorKl~. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 550.0 Arterial Stree~ 101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Real Eslate Excise Tax 109 0.0 327.0 154.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parks Capital Facility 112 0.0 88.0 96.0 148.0 275.5 99.0 102.0 Pe~lergast Pa~ 308 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gold Mtn Golf Course 407 0.0 154.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equip. Rent, al Re~rve 510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Roo~avell Capital Assel 622 0.0 200.0 0.0 200.0 300.0 0.0 150.0 TIB(UATA) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSDOT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Coup/Slate/Fed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Navy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Street Vacation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 870.0 33.0 17.0 50.0 TOTAL SOURCES 0.0 1,213.5 2,510.0 3,728.0 6,518.5 12~.0 862.0 FACILITIES PROJECTS FAg7OF0 PICNIC TABLES & PARK BENCHES REPLACEMENT mARK17 J RRIGATION PROJECTS BALL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS UNIDENTIFIED & EMERGENCY PROJECTS GLEN JARSTAD AQUATIC CTR - ADA ADAPTATION MANET'I'E PARK- RESTROOM REHABILITATION PLAYGROUND EQUIP. REPAIR & REPLACEMENT LIONS PARK - TENNIS COURT REHAB WARREN AVENUE PLAYFIELD - RESTROOM & LIGHTING iPENDERGAST PARK- UNIDENTIFIED & EMERG PROJ !PURCHASE & DEVELOP HADDON SCHOOL SITE J EVERGREEN PARKJ . KJTSAP LAKE PARK- PARK BOAT/TRAILER SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER HVAC SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER - EXTERIOR PAINT & CARPET REPL. VARIOUS NECESSARY ADA IMPROVEMENTS LIONS PARK- DOCK REPAIR SHERIDAN RECREATION CTR - ELECT. UPGD PAT CARRY VISTA - SHORELINE REHABILITATION PENDERGAST REGIONAL PARK- LIGHTS PENDERGAST REG. PARK FIELDS 4,5, & 6 CONST. 9TH STREET MINI-PARK - SHORELINE REHABILITATION GLEN JARSTAD AQUATIC CTR - ROOF REPAIR J JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER - PUBLIC ACCESS ENHANCE NAD PARK- DEMOLISH HOUSE, CREATE PICNIC AREA WARREN AVENUE PLAYFIELD J MANE'I-rE - DEVELOP.- PLAYFIELD REHABILITATION BLUEBERRY PARK- DEVELOPMENT J I JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER - LOCKER ROOM IMP. GLEN JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER - FALSE CEILING GLEN JARSTAD AQUATIC CENTER - FAC. UPGD. =Ag7OF2 NAD PARK- RESTROOM RENOVATION N.A.D. MARINE PARK- DEVELOPMENT PARKS & RECREATION COMMUNITY CENTER SENIOR CENTER - OFFICE & RECEPTION AREA EXPAN. Capital Facilities Element - Part :2 CFP - 83 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY - PARKS Pt~IOR "'1997 19981 1999t 20(X}l ~::~I t 2002 ,FA97GF1 SENIOR ClTtZ. ENS CENTER- ROOF !FAgTOF2 LIONS FIELD - SHELTER FA97OF2 REHAB TENNIS COURTS 10,0 FA97OF2 LIONS FIELD- PARKING LOT RENOVATION 30.0 IFA97OF1 KITSAP LAKE PARK- PHASE III DESIGN 50.0 FA97OF1 LENT LANE -MASTER PLAN - DEVELOPMENT 150.0 !FAgBOFO PENDERGAST PARK PHASE III - RV CAMPGROUND 550.0 SUB-TOTAL 0.0 1,157,5,. j 2,507.0 3,693.0 6,488.5 116.0 843,0 EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES EQB8PK0 PURCHASE TWO' 15 PASSENGER VANS 30.01 EQ97GF0 GLEN JARSTAD AQ. CTR - CHEM DISINFECT. SYS 5.0 EQgBPK0 PARKS MISCELLANEOUS 5.0 8.0 5.0 EQ97OFO GLEN JARSTAD AQ. CTR - WATER SLIDE 6.0 EQg7OF0 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT -INFIELD MACHINE 10.0 EQg7OF0 SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER - UPGRADES 3.0 12.0 4.0 EQg7GF0 PARKS & RECREATION COPY MACHINE 15.0 EQg7GFO GLEN JARSTAD AQ. CTR - DEHUM. SYS. REPAIRAJPGD. 30.0 EQg7GFO GLEN JARSTAO AQ. CTR - BOILER TUBE REPAIR I 10.0, EQgaPKD ADMINISTRATION - CHAIR AND TABLE REPLACEMENT 10.0 SUB-TOTAL 0.0 56.0 3.0 35.0 30.0 10.0' 19.O [GRAND TOTAL ,., 0.0 1,213.5 2,510.0 3,728.0 6,518.5' "126.0 862.0 [DIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 84 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CiTY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY - GOLF { PRIOR 1997 1998 1999 2C(X) I 2001 2002 ISOURCES OF FUNO~; C.-,er-,e~al Governmental 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gran{s - CDBG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Grants - Other 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wastewater 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stormv,'ater 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bonds - Vo[ed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 G.O. Bonds: Non-Voted 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Revenue 8oods. 0.0 0,0 2,000.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Arterial Street 101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Real Estate Excisa Tax 109 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Parks Capital Facility 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pendergast. Park 30~ 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 Gold Mtn C~f Course 407 0.0 509.0 113,0 116.0 119.0 123.0 427.0 Equip. Rental Ree~rve 510 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Roosevelt Capital Asse{ 622 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TIB(UATA) 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSOOT 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 CounyStale/Fed 0.0 · 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Navy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Street, Vacatk~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 * 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL SOURCES 0.0 509.0 2~113.0 116.0 119.0 123.0 427.0 FACILITIES PROJECTS FA97OF1 MTN GOLF COURSE - NEW CLUB HOUSE 2,0~30.0I SUB-TOTAL . 0.0 2,000.0 0.0 0 0.0 300.0 EQUtPMENT& VEHICLES SUB-TOTAL ] 0.0 lO9.O! 113.01 116.01 119.oI 123.o! 127.0J [GRAND TOTAL I ~i0[ 509.01 2,113.01 116,01 119.01 123.01 ~427.0J [.DIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES [ '~10I 0,0 [ 010I 0..01 0:0 ] 0.0I 0101 Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 85 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance PrDgram CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM SUMMARY o GENERAL. FUND PRIOR 1997 1998 1999 20001 2001 2~32 iSOURCE$ OF FUNDS I ~1 Geverrm'~rfml 62.0 148.0 358.2 42B.B 327.6 403.7 205.7 i Gr~nt~ - CDBG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gran~ . Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wate~ 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 23.5 1.3 1.3 Wastewate~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 Ston~w3ter 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. ~ - Vo~ed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bood~: No~.-Vo(ed 234.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Revenue Bonds. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Artedal Stree~ 101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Real E~ate Excise Tax 109 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pmd~ Cal:~al Facility 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 P~c~rg~ Pall( 308 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Go~d Mtn Golf Coum~ 407 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equip. Re~al Resecve 510 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Roo~evel Capital Ass~ 6'22 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TIB(UATA) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSDOT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 County/State/Fed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Navy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Streel Vacation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Other 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 TOTAL SOURCES 296.5 148.0 359.5 430.1 365.1 405.0 207.0 FACILITIES PROJECTS FAS7GF11FAC~UTmS PLAN I I =5.01 ~'= I 1~.51 9.51 ~25.01 =.0 I FAg7GF1 JPAINT FIRE STATIONS 2 1 3 ' 7.5 SUB-TOTAL 0.0 25.0 12~.2 158.5 71.5 138.5 22.0 EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES POLICE1 JPATROLVEHICLE REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE J J 75.0 I ~25.01 ~25.01 ~25.0 I 125.0 ~35.0 I GENSATICOMPUTERS I 2~s.s I ~2~.o I I I I I I PSFIRE3 IDEVELOP & IMPLEMENT EMERGENCYOPER. CTR. I I I 10.0 I I I I I EQ98GF0~REPLACEMENTOF FIRE HOSE I I I ~o.ol I ~o.ol I ~o.ol PSFIREI/COMMERCIALWASHER/DRYER I I I 1~.5 I I I I I POLICE 4~MOBILE DATA TERMINALS I I I 3~.81 ~.sl ~0.6] 42.7l I EQg8GFC~COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES I I I ,o.o I ,o.o I ~o.o I ,o.o I ~o.o I PSFIREllEMERGENCYGENERATORS'FIRESTA2&3 I I I I ~7.01 I I I "SF,R~-21RAD,O EQUIPMENT UPDATE I I I I 5~.o I I I 1 EQg7GF0~SURVEY EQUIP. PURCHASES- ENGINEERING DIV. I I I I I 28 0 I I I PSFIRE2ILIFE-PAKCARDIAC MONITOR/DEFIBRILATOR I ' I "1 I I I lzo I I EQg7GF0JFURNISHINGS FOR COUNCIL CHAMBER I I I I I I 6.8 I I EQ98GF0JREPLACEMENTOFSCBABREATHINGAPPARATUSI' J ' '1 I I '1 SUB-TOTAL J 2~5.S t' 204.0 I ~3.3 I 271.6 I 2~3.6 ! 26~.S I ~.01 JGRANOTOTAL I 2~5.51 Z~.01 35g-Sl ~.11 355,~1 '~-01 207.01 JOIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES I 81.0 I IB1.0)l 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 86 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 15~T- 2002 PRO~RAM SUMMARY. OTHER FUND8 SOURCES OF'FUND~ ....... ~ ~ o.o s.3 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o Grm~ - CDBG 0.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gran'm - Other 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Water 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 W~tevv~u~ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stomrwate¢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bondl - Voted 314.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.O. Bond~: Non-Vo~cl 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,500.0 0.0 0.0 Revenue Bond~. 0.0 0.0 0.0 s. 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 10,000.0 Arterial S~'eot 101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Re~l E~ta ~ T~x 109 0.g 50.0 50.0 50.0 1,0~.0 50.0 50.0 Park~ ~ Facility 112 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Penderga~ P~rR 308 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Go~ ~ Golf Coume 407 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equip. Renal Re~fve 510 0.0 352.3 926.0 488.5 880.7 858.1 239.0 Roosevelt Cap#~ A~e< 822 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TIS(UATA) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FAUS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WSDOT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ISTEA. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 County/State/Fed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Navy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 S~ee~ Vac~don 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Othee 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL SOURCES ,.. 314.8 470.6 976.0 10,538.5 4,210.7 708.1 ,10z269.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS INg7OF0 ICONTINGENCY FOR UNIO' INFRASTRUCT' PROJEC TS150'01 ,ol SUB-TOTAL I 0.0 118.3 50.0 10,C50.0 50.0,, 50.0 50.0, FACILITIES PROJECTS FAgBOF0 INEW CITY HALL 3,500.0 FAgBOF0 iSINCLAIR 0.0., 0.0,, 0.0 3, ,5~.0 0.0, 31 10,000.0 SUB-TOTAL 4.6 EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES [GRAND TOTAL ',, "' .[ 4, ,0.0 [ 7,85.2,,[ 976.0 [ 10,~.5"'1 4,2io.7J 708.1 [lO',28~.'o-] [DIFFERENCES SOURCES LESS USES [ , 3~4.6 I (3~4.8)[ 0.0 I ' 0.0 j 0.0 [ ,0.0 I O,O.J Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 87 Capital Facilities Program CITY OF BREMERTON 1997 - 2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SOURCES OF FUNDING - PARKS AND GENERAl. GOVERNMENT PROJECTS 1997: 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002' GENERAL FUND FUND 001, ADA Curb Cut Pro, ram 2.0 K3tsap Lake Boat/Trailer 5.0 Traffic Calming and safety devices 6.3 Senl,~' Center HVAC i 14.5 Administration - Purchase two 15 passencjer vans j 15.0 Facilities Plan J 25.0 12.6.2 [ 158.5 59.5 125.0 22.0 ' Computer~ 12-'9.0 Patrol Vehicle Replacement 75.0 [ 12.5.0 ~25.0 125.0 125.0 135.0 · Develop & Implement Emerg. Op. Cir. j 10.0 Replacement of fire hose 10.0 10.0 10.0 Commercial Washer/DP/er 11.5 Computer Teohnolo~ Upgrades 38.7 38.7 73.5 38.7 38.7 Emergency Generators Fire Sra. 2 & 3 17.0 Survey Equip. - Engineering Division 7.0 Air Condiflonin(,,1 Fire Station 2 & 3 12.0 5.0 Llfe-Pak 10 Cardiac Mon/Defib 12.0 Furnishings for Council Chamber 6.8 Paint Fire Station 2 & 3 7.5 Replacement of SCBA breathing apparatus 40.0 ~,VAILABLE 271.8 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 NET THIS YEAR 0.0 (71.4) (8g.2) (37.0)i (111.0) 44.3 NET CUMULATIVE 0.0 ~71.4/ /160.6/ I197.611 (308.61 (264.3) PARKS CAPITAL FACILITY FUND 112 Irrigation Proiecta 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Playground Equipment Repair & Replacemenl 15.0 0.0 10.0 I 0.0 10.0 $ 0.0 Ball§eld Improvements 10.0 10.0 15.0 I 0.0 10.0 10.0 Picnic Tables & Park Benches 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Unidentified & Emer~eno7 Projects 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Misc. Ec[uiP. - Infield Machine 10.0 Lions Park - Tennis Court Rehab. 20.0 Parks Miscellaneous 5.0 8.0 5.0 Glen Jarstad AC[. Ctr.- Chem. S~tem 5.0 Senior Citizens Cente~- Upgrades 3.0 12.0 4.0 Senior Center- Extedor Paintincj & car~et replacement 5.0 5.0 Lions Park. Dock Repair 15.0 Pat Carey Vista - Shoreline Rehabilitation 25.0 Sheridan Recreation Center Elect. Up~d. 15.0 Parks & Recreation Copy Machine 15.0 9th SIre~t Mini-Park - Shoreline Rehabilitalion 15.0 Jarstad Ac[uatlc Cent~- Public Areas Enhancement 20.0 Glen Jaratad AC[. Ctr.- Roo[ Repair 30.0 Manette- Develop - Pla~field Rehabilitation 150.0 Jarstad Ac[uatic Cenler - Locker Room Improvements 10.0 Glen Jamtad AC[. Cir. - False Ceilin~ Insp. & Rep. 10.0 Glen Jarstad Ac[uatlc Center- Facility UFx:jrades 14.5 NAD Park Restroom Renovation 13.0 Glen Jaratad Ac[. Ctr.- Dehum. S~tem 30.0 Glen Jarstad Ac[. Ctr.- Boiler Tube RepI. 10.0 Lions Field Shelter 13.0 Senior Citizens Center- Office & Reception Area F_.~an. 13.0 Senior Citizen Cfi. - Roof Repair 20.0 Parka Tennis Courts Resur/acln~ 10.0 Lions Park - Parldnc~ Lot Renovalion 30.0 Administralion - Chair & Table replacement 10.0 ..................... · .......-...............-.-.-,......-...<.......-.. ...... ,' · :-"-.~ .......... ~- ...:..;~...~:~?~.w¥,v. :.;...:.:..,_..~,~,~,.. ^VAILA8LE , 88.0 74.0 t 65.2 265.5 194.6 25~, ~,0 Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 88 Capital Facilities Program CITY OF BREMERTON 1997 -2002 CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SOURCES OF FUNDING - PAR, KS AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT PROJECTS REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX FUND 109 Infrastructure Contincjenc.~ 50.0 50.0 50.0 ,50,0 50.0 50,0 Administration - Purchase two 15 ,oassenc~er 'rahs 15.0 Haddon School Site - L,and Purchase 150.0 Haddon Schoot Site - Oevelopmenl,, t ,225.0 Glen Jaratad Aej. Ctr.- Waler Siiae 6.0 AVAILABLE 270.0 337.4 350.5 364.0 378.0 406.8 ROOSEVELT FIELD ASSET~ FUND 622 EVergreen Park 435.0 NAD Park - Demolish house & create' picnic area 100.0 Warren Avenue Pla~ield 100.0 NAD Madne Park- Development 300.0 Lent Lane - Master Plan & Development 150,0 AVAILABLE 140.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 G,O, BONDS~ VOTED Parks & Recreation Commun~ Cen't'er 5,600.0 G, Ot BONOS; NON-VD,TED Pendergast Park - Lights I'or Athletic Fields 250.0 Pendeq]ast Park Fields 4, 5 & 6 Construction 1,750.0 Blueberry Pad( - Development 500.0 ,,. Evergreen, Park Project 2,000.0 ,REVENUE BONDS , Pen, der~ast Park Phase III - RV Cam]:~round 55~,.0 CEN-COM BQND LEVY Mobile Data Terminals 36.8 38.6 40.6 42.7 Radio Equipment Update 5~.0 IA(; Evergreen Park 300.0"' pendergast Park - LIcjhts 250.0 ,. NAD Madne Park 300.0 DONATIONS/MATCH/U,NKNQWN Irri~Jatlon Projects 33.0 Lions Field Shelter 17.0 ~c~Sap Lake Park - Phase 111 O~si~]n .... 50.0 Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 89 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Prpgram CITY OF BREMERTON 1997 . 2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SOURCES OF FUNDING - PARKS AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT PROJECTS i ~ 9971 19981 19991 ~ 2OOll :~:)2! BLOCK GRANT G~en Jamtad Aq. Cts. ADA Adair. 12.3 Trafl'~c Calimln(~ and safet~ devices 50.0 ADA Curb Cut Pro, ram 10.0 Various A DA Improvements 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Maneffs Park- Restroom Rehabilitation 14.4 Warren Pla~letd - Restroom Rehab & pla~eld li(~hlin~ 23.9 Haddon Schoo{ Si~e 29.4 D.O.Ei eRANT Evergreen Park Project 870.0 DII.r REBATI~ qadar Speed Notlflcallon Tralle~ 14.9 WATE RJWASTEWATEFUSTOR MWATER Survey Equipment - Eng. Division 21.0 Capital Facilities Element- Part 2 CFP - 90 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM INFRASTRUCTURE SUMMARY CIP ID # DESCRIPTION General Governmental Grants - CDBG Granta - EDA Water Wastewater Stormwater G.O. Bonds - Voted G. O. Bonds - Non-Voted Revenue Bonds Arterial Sb'ed 101 Real Estate Excise Tax 109 Parks Capilal Facility 112 Pendergast Park 308 Gold Mtn Golf Course 407 Equip. Rental Reserve 510 Roosevelt Capital Asset 622 TIB(UATA) FAUS WSDOT ISTEA County/Stata/Fed Navy Street Vacation Other TOTAL SOURCES WATER UTILITY UTILWA87 12' DISTRIBUTION WATER MAIN IN98WA01 WATER SYSTEM FLUORIDATION UTILWA18 SR #3 TRANSMISSION MAIN SYSTEM IMPROVEME UTILWA27 PUMP STA #14 REPLACEMENT & 12" TRANS. MAIN UTILWA23 E396 ZONE TRANSMISSION MAIN & STORAGE UTILWA83 WARREN AVENUE BRIDGE MAIN IN97WA01 12. DIST. WATER MAIN - SHOREWOOD DR TO RES UTILWA5t WEST 540 ZONE DEVELOPMENT UTILWA47 WEST 650ZONE DEVELOPMENT UTILWA,48 RESERVOIR SEISMIC IMPROVEMENTS UTILWA84 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM UTILWA89 CORROSION CONTROL TREATMENT FACILITY UTILWA2. SILVERDALE MOBILE ESTATES WELL UTILWA64 18' SHERMAN HEIGHTS TRANSMISSION MAIN UTILWA45 DOMSEAWELL DEVELOPMENT UTILWA72 PINE RD. MCWILLIAMS TO WELL 21 UTILWA21 36' MAIN EXTENSION SUB-TOTAL WASTEWATER UTILITY I IN97WW01 ANDERSON COVE BASIN CSO SEPARATION PROJ 30.0I 35.0I 115.0I 755.0I 764.0I 758.0 INg8WW02 CSO DETENTION STRUCTURES I I 250.01 = 0.01 250.01 I UTILWWg CALLOW AVENUE DRAINAGE BASIN CSO PROJ I I 3 ,~2.01 4,035.01 2,05g.01 I 400.0 3,790.0 UTILWW20 SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM - 00.0- 220.0 220.0 220.0 220.0 220.0 220.0 UTILWW17 OYSTER BAY BASIN INTERCEPTOR 23.0 r-"O.0 ' IN98WW01 PORT WASHINGTON NARROWS INVERTED SIPHON · SUB-TOTAL I 3,§75.01 4,290.01 2,763.01 1,325.01 1,234.01 1,428.0J 4,743.0 Capital Facilities Element - Part 2 CFP - 91 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program CITY OF BREMERTON CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1997 - 2002 PROGRAM INFRASTRUCTURE SUMMARY c,P,O# JOESCR,PTION I PRIOR I 1997l 19981 19991 2°°°I" 2001J 20021 STORMWATER UTILITY STORM0t' KEAN STREETIRO~ERS STREET STORM DRAINAGE 68.0 430.0 STORM03 STORM DRAINAGE MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 STORM02 EAGLE AVENUE STORM DRAINAGE 10.0 90.0 SU B-TOTAL 0.0 128.0 500.0 150.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 TRANSPORTATION TRANS1 [MISCELLANEOUS 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 TRANS4 iSYLVAN WAY OVERLAY - OLYMPUS TO WHEATON 20.0 ' 203.0 TRANS6IKiTSAP WAY RECONSTRUCT - WESLON TO AUTO 55.0 890.0 20.0 TRANS7 SR3/SR304 BREMERTON FERRY TERMINAL TO GO 2,200.0 5,579.7 6,243.0 4,704.5 .1,600.0 786.0 TRANS3 WERNER ROAD/LOXIE F_..AGANS BLVD. IMPROVEM 8.5 40.0 35.0 TRANS5 WARREN AVENUE SOUTHBOUND OFFRAMP TO ~ALLAHAN 64.0 176.0 INg7AS01 KEAN & UNION IMPROVEMENTS 120.0 33.0 TRANS8 SR303 CORRIDOR - MAJOR INVESTMENT STUD? 150.0 300.0 .150.0 INg7AS02 'RODGERS STREET CONSTRUCTION 345.0 80.0 IN98AS01 AUTO CENTER WY, BRUEN AVE TO SR3 SB ON RAMP 30.0 250.0 I SUB-TOTAL I 2,283.5 6,822.7 7,132.0 5,478.5 1,930.0 1~186.0 150.0 OTHER FUNDS INgTOF01 CONTINGENCY FOR UNID. INFRASTRUCT. PROJECTS 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 IN97OF02 TRAFFIC CALMING & SAFETY DEVICES 56.3 INgSGF01 ADA CURB CUT PROGRAM 12.0 IN98PK02 ILLAHEETRUST LANDS- PURCHASE 10,000.0 SUB-TOTAL 0.0 118.3 50.0 10,050.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 JGRANO TOTAL I 5.993.5 1 12,958.5 1 15,575.5 12i;661.5 1 s,939:01 4,954.01 6,363.1~ I ' Capital Facililies Element - Part 2 CFP - 92 Capital Facilities Program Six-Year Finance Program Capital Projects and Financing Plan Table SC-13 presents Brcmcrton School's six-year plan for capital improvement projects; h~cluding sources of public money within the projected funding capacities that constitute the probable funding of District's capital improvement projects. In 199 i, the voters of the Bremcrton School District authorized a $17 nfillion boud issue. That program is now complete. The District docs not anticipate r~qucsting addiiional voter authorization before 1998. The District uses a citizens review conunittee to identify future, capital projecls for rccosmnendation to the District's Board of Directors. Table SC-13. Bremerton School District Capital Projects and Financing Plan ($000) Cost/Revenue 199.__.~7 1998 .1999. 200__..~0 2001 2002 Total Non-Capacity Proiect 1. Administration Building 1,350 1,350 2. Maintenance & 1,200 1,200 Transportation Building (Replacement) 3. Brcmerton Jtmior High " 15,~)00 15,000 (Replacement) 4. Olympic View Elementary (Replacement) 8,000 8,000 Total Cost 1,350 24,200 25,550 Local Funds* 1,350 1,350 Local Bond Funds 24,200 24,200 State Match Impact Fees 20. 20. 20. 20. 20 80. Total Reveuues 1,370 20. 24,220 20. 20 20. 25,630 Balance 20. 20. 20. 20. 20 20. 80. *Local Funds it~clude revenue from property leases tu~d surplus properly sales. Sourcc: Bremcrton School District Thc District anticipatcs only linfitcd cligibility for Statc match'ing fimds. Thc actual rcccipt of state matching funds is difficult to predict because o£statc funding shortfalls, hnpact fcc rcvcnuc forecasts arc consistent wifl~ past income from new residential development (the District has $2,888 in its hnpact, fee account at the beginning of 1997). Capital Facilities Element - Pad 2 CFP - 93 Capital Facilities Program