HomeMy WebLinkAbout4597 ORDINANCE NO. 7
AN ORDINANCE adopting the Charleston Community Plan
as an amendment to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and
adopting Related Amendments to the Text and Maps
of the Bremerton Zoning Code, BMC 21.02.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton adopted a revised Comprehensive Plan by
Ordinance No. 4545 in February 1996 to comply with the Growth Management Act and with an
Order of the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan discussed the need for a "Specific Area Plan" for
the Charleston Business District to address the needs and concerns of those who live, work, shop,
or own property in the area; and
WHEREAS, Bremerton combined its resources with a Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) and a State Planning and Environmental Review Fund (PERF) grant to develop
an Integrated GMA/SEPA plan for the Charleston District that includes the Plan, an EIS, and
specific policies and recommendations aimed at desired neighborhood improvements, including
public and private actions, a process for the streamlined approval of"planned actions",
improvement concepts for future action, and zoning amendments that include a new "Charleston
District (CD)" zone; and
WHEREAS, the Charleston Plan was developed to comply with the provisions of the
Growth Management Act and to be consistent with the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and
related development regulations; and
WHEREAS, the preparation of the Charleston Community Plan and related
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) involved the citizens, property owners, merchants and
others in an early and continuous series of neighborhood meetings, study sessions and a public
hearing before the Planning Commission on May 20, 1997, after which the Commission
recommended Council adoption of the Plan and zoning recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the Plan was submitted for the mandatory 60-day State agency review in
· April 1997; and
Charleston Plan Ordinance: Page 1
WHEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on June 11, 1997
to accept public comments and to consider the recommendations of State agencies, the public,
and the Planning Commission; now therefore
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
Section 1. The Charleston Community Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", is hereby
adopted as an amendment to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan.
Section 2. The Bremerton Zoning Code (BMC 21.02) is amended as follows:
(a) The map in Appendix Figure 070(a), delineating the Charleston Business District,
is amended per attached Exhibit "B".
(b) Appendix Figure 080, Zones, is amended to add the "CD (Charleston District)"
zone under the Commercial category per attached Exhibit "C".
(c) Appendix Figure 090, Primary Zone Consistency, is amended to include the "CD"
Comprehensive Plan designation and its related zones, as shown in Exhibit "D".
(d) Page 11 of Appendix Figure 120, Zone Summary, is amended to add the
description, intent, and minimum standards for the "CD" zone, as shown in
Exhibit "E".
(e) Appendix Figure 130, Lot Requirements, is amended to add the development
requirements for the "CD" zone, as shown in Exhibit "F".
(f) Appendix Figure 140, Land Use Tables, is amended to establish the uses allowed
in the "CD" zone, as shown in Exhibit "G".
(g) Appendix Figure 600, Special Parking Districts, is amended to indicate that all
non-residential land uses within the Charleston Business District are exempt from
the off-street parking and loading space requirements of the Zoning Code, as
shown in Exhibit 'T'.
(h) BMC 21.02.670(a)(iv)(c) is amended to include an off-street parking exemption
for the Charleston Business District as follows:
(c)" ..... , o.._: .... ,-,: ~._:_. ~,__,.:__ n ___ Parking Exemptions
(1) The CBD Parking Area, as shown in Figure 600, is exempt
from the off-street parking and loading space requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance.
(2)
Charleston Plan Ordinance: Page 2
Parking facilities that are provided voluntarily ~
th~ ~BD o~ ~harle~ Dt~ shall conform to the minimum design
standards of this Chapter for Class "B" lots.
Section 3. The Official Zoning Map is hereby amended to apply the "IP (Industrial
Park)" and "CD (Charleston District)" zones within the "Charleston Business District"
Comprehensive Plan designation; and change the zoning from "MX" to "MF" along Wycoff
Avenue generally between Coontz and Sixth Streets, as shown in Exhibit "H".
APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading this twenty-fifth day of June, 1997.
PASSED by the Bremerton City Council this second day of July, 1997.
DAVID FARR, President
Bremerton City Council
APPROVEOthis dlq-~- day of ~> ~ , 1997.
LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
~*~,_~ (._k~-~ ~ ~City Clerk
KATHLEEN McCLUS~Ir,
Published:
Effective:
CHARLESTON: chasplan.ord
Charleston Plan Ordinance: Page 3
Summary of
ORDINANCE NO. -5/~5-~ y
AN ORDINANCE adopting the Charleston Community Plan
as an Amendment to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan and
Adopting Related Amendments to the Text and Maps
of the Bremerton Zoning Code, BMC 21.02.
Section 1. The Charleston Community Plan is adopted to provide a long-range
comprehensive vision and specific plan policies and action recommendations to guide
future public and private improvements and land uses within the area generally bounded
by Thirteenth Street on the north, Rainier and Bryan Avenues on the east, Forest Ridge
Park on the west, and the southern City limits and PSNS on the south. The Plan
addresses identified problems and opportunities within the areas of land use,
transportation, housing, recreation, capital facilities and utilities, and urban design. This
is an Integrated GMA/SEPA Plan that includes an Environmental Impact Study and
establishes the basis for allowing certain types of land uses as "Planned Actions" without
further environmental review.
Section 2. Based on recommendations in the Charleston Plan, the text and maps of the
City's Zoning Code are amended as follows:
(a) The Charleston Business District map is amended.
(b) Figure 080 (Zones) is amended to add the description of the "CD" zone to
the commercial category.
(c) Figure 090 (Primary Zone Consistency) is amended to include the "CD"
Comprehensive Plan designation and its related zones.
(d) Figure 120 (Zone Summary) is amended to add the description, intent, and
minimum standards for the "CD" zone.
(e) Figure 130 (Lot Requirements) is amended to add the development
requirements for the new "CD" zone.
(f) Figure 140 (Land Use Tables) is amended to establish the uses allowed in
the new "CD" zone.
(g) Figure 600 (Special Parking Districts) is amended to indicate that non-
residential land uses within the Charleston Business District are exempt
from off-street parking requirements.
(h) BMC 21.02.670(a)(iv)(c) is amended to include the off-street parking
exemption for the Charleston Business District.
Section 3. The Official Zoning Map is amended to apply the "IP (Industrial Park)" and
"CD (Charleston District)" zones within the Charleston Business District; and to change
the zoning from "MX" to "MF" along portions of Wycoff Avenue between Coontz and
Sixth Streets.
APPROVED by the City Council on June 25, 1997 and PASSED on July 2, 1997. The
full text of this ordinance will be mailed to interested persons upon request.
F/nal
Charleston Community Plan
June 18, 1997
~ITY OF BREMERTON · 239 4th Street · Bremerton, WA 98337
June 18, 1997
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The comment period for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) on the Charleston
Community Plan closed as of May 26, 1997. During this period, the City received both written
and oral comments regarding both the content of the plan and potential impacts associated
therewith. Some of the comments led to revisions of the Plan; those changes are not included in
the updated Charleston Community Plan being presented to the Bremerton City Council for
adoption.
Comments received on the Plan and the DEIS and changes to both these documents are included
in the attached submittal which, in conjunction with the DEIS, will serve as the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Charleston Community Plan.
As provided for by the State Environmental Policy Act, you may appeal findings of the FEIS
within 30 days of the City Council's announcement that they have taken action on (adopted) the
Plan. Notice of that action will be published in the Bremerton Sun. For additional information,
contact Bremerton DCD, 286 Fourth Street, Bremerton, WA 98337 or call (360) 478-5275.
Donald L. Pratt, Director
Department of Community Development
Celebrating 50 Years of Freedom
LWTEGRATED PLAN/ElIS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER LETTER
Charleston Community Plan (Preferred Action)
INTRODUCTION ..................................................... P-1
Relationship to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan ...................... P-1
The Community Planning Process .................................... P-2
Overview of the Plan .............................................. P-2
COMMUNITY PROFILE ................................................ P-3
Historic Heritage ................................................. P-4
VISION STATEMENT .................................................. P-5
The Vision for Bremerton .......................................... P-5
Bremerton -- 20 Years From Now ................................ P-5
Neighborhoods ................................................... P-6
The Vision for the Charleston Community ............................. P-7
Community Identity and Character ................................ P-7
Business District .............................................. P-7
COMMUNITY PLAN .................................................. P-8
Introduction ..................................................... P-8
Plan Proposal Development ...................................... P-9
Land Use Proposals .............................................. P-9
The Vision Guides the Plan ...................................... P-9
Adjustments will Accommodate Change ........................... P-10
Revised Plan and Zoning Maps will Guide Change .................. P-12
Transportation Proposals .......................................... P-12
Providing Good Public Streets and Sidewalks ....................... P-12
Taking Advantage of Bus Service ................................ P-13
Preserving the Parking on Callow ................................ P-13
Providing Parking That Serves the Needs .......................... P-14
Putting Parking in the Right Locations ............................ P-14
Rediscovering the Pedestrian .................................... P-15
Reducing the Impact of Major Arterials ........................... P-16
i
Charleston Community Plan
Promoting Transportation Alternatives ............................ P- 18
Housing Proposals ............................................... P- 18
Economic Health ............................................. P-20
Improving the Mix of Businesses ............................. P-20
Organizing the Merchants ................................... P-21
Capital Facilities and Utilities Proposals ...... · ..................... P-22
Meeting the Utilities Demands of Future Growth ................. P-22
Considering Public Uses .................................... P-22
Enhancing Police Protection ................................. P-23
Recreation Proposals ............................................. P-24
Improving the Community with Parks and Open Space ............... P-24
Urban Design Proposals ........................................... P-25
Encouraging Improvements ..................................... P-25
Making Signs Work Effectively ................................. P-26
Making the District Warm and Inviting ............................ P-26
Undergrounding Utility Lines ................................... P-31
Taking Care of Vacant Lots ..................................... P-31
Creating a Positive First Impression .............................. P-32
IMPLEMENTATION ................................................... P-33
Proposed Charleston District (CD) Zone .............................. P-33
Planned Actions ................................................. P-34
Design Guidelines ............................................... P-36
Proposed Design Guidelines .................................... P-36
Design Review Overlay (DRO) Zone ............................. P-37
Design Review Process ........................................ P-37
Capital Improvement Projects ...................................... P-39
LIST OF TABLES
Pl. Recommended Capital Facilities in Charleston Area ................. P-28
LIST OF FIGURES
Pl. Location Map ................................................ P-3
P2. Charleston Community Plan (map) .............................. P-11
P3. Charleston Community Plan (sketch) ............................. P~28
P4. Charleston Community Urban Design Concept Plan ................. P-29
PS. Charleston Community Urban Deesign Concept Plan (B) ............. P-30
ii
Charleston Community Plan
Final Environmental Impact Statement
FACT SHEET ........................................................ E-1
I. SUMMARY ....................................................... E-2
A. Introduction: Purpose and Need .................................. E-2
B. Planning Process .............................................. E-2
C. Integrated EIS/Master Plan Strategy ............................... E-2
D. Proposed Action and Alternatives Considered ....................... E-3
E. Impacts and Mitigation Measures ................................. E-5
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............ E-6
A. Proposed Action Overview ...................................... E-6 1. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan
2. The Community Planning Process
3. Overview of the Plan
B. Alternatives Considered ......................................... E-7
1. No Action Alternative ...................................... E-7
a. Land Use/Zoning
b. Transportation
c. Housing
d. Capital Facilities
e. Utilities
£ Recreation
g. Urban Design
2. Preferred Action (Alternative 1): See Charleston Community Plan .. P-1
3. Alternative 2 (Options to Preferred Action) ..................... E-8
a. Land Use
b. Transportation
III. AFFECTED ENVlRONMENT~ SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS~ MITIGATION MEASURES
AND UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS ............................... E-9
A. Land Use E-9
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Land Use In and Around Study Area
b. Existing Zoning
iii
Charleston Community Platt
c. Historical/Cultural Features
d. Key Development Regulations (parking, setbacks, height limits)
e. Sample Valuations -- Commercial Uses
2. Significant Impacts
a. No Action
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Action)
c. Alternative 2
3. Mitigation Measures
4. Unavoidable Impacts
B. Housing .................................................. E-15
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Housing Stock in Study Area
b. Housing Valuation and Affordability
2. Significant Impacts
a. No Action
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Action)
c. Alternative 2
3. Mitigation Measures
4. Unavoidable Impacts
C. Transportation/Circulation ...................................... E-25
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Circulation In and Around Study Area
b. Existing LOS and Capacity
c. Parking Supply/Utilization
d. Transit Service
e. Scheduled Improvements (e.g., SR 304)
f. Pedestrian Circulation
2. Significant Impacts
a. No Action
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Action)
c. Alternative 2
3. Mitigation Measures
4. Unavoidable Impacts
D. Capital Facilities/Utilities ...................................... E-37
E. Recreation .................................................. E-37
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Facilities in Study Area
iv
Charleston Community Plan
c. Historical/Cultural Features
d. Key Development Regulations (parking, setbacks, height limits)
e. Sample Valuations -- Commercial Uses
2. Significant Impacts
a. No Action
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Action)
c. Alternative 2
3. Mitigation Measures
4. Unavoidable Impacts
B. Housing .................................................. E-15
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Housing Stock in Study Area
b. Housing Valuation and Affordability
2. Significant Impacts
a. No Action
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Action)
c. Alternative 2
3. Mitigation Measures
4. Unavoidable Impacts
C. Transportation/Circulation ...................................... E-25
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Circulation In and Around Study Area
b. Existing LOS and Capacity
c. Parking Supply/Utilization
d. Transit Service
e. Scheduled Improvements (e.g., SR 304)
f. Pedestrian Circulation
2. Significant Impacts
a. No Action
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Action)
c. Alternative 2
3. Mitigation Measures
4. Unavoidable Impacts
D. Capital Facilities/Utilkies ...................................... E-37
E. Recreation .................................................. E-37
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Facilities in Study Area
iv
Charleston Community Platt
2. Significant Impacts
a. No Action
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Action)
c. Alternative 2
3. Mitigation Measures
4. Unavoidable Impacts
COMMENTS RECEIVED ............................................. E-39
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ........................................... E-52
PROPOSED CttANGES ............................................... E-55
LIST OF TABLES
El. Business District Inventory ................................... E-10
E2. Assessed Values ............................................ E-13
E3. 1990 Occupancy and Tenure in Charleston Block Groups ........... E-17
E4. 1990 Occupancy and Tenure in Charleston "Core" Block Groups ..... E-17
E5. Existing and Potential New Housing Units in Charleston Planning Area E-19
E6. Summary Valuations ........................................ E-22
E7. Existing Residential Un/ts in Proposed Residential Zones ........... E-23
E8. Potential New Residential Units in Proposed Residential Zones ...... E-24
E9. Charleston District Parking Supply ............................. E-30
LIST OF FIGURES
El. Existing Zoning ............................................ E-11
E2. Census Boundaries .......................................... E-16
E3. Area of Proposed Land Use/Zoning Changes ..................... E-18
E4. Block Numbers Outside Business Core .......................... E-20
ES. Residential Assessed Value Survey -- Sample Areas ............... E-21
E6. 1992 Traffic Volumes ....................................... E-26
ET. Arterial Routes ............................................. E-27
ES. Existing On-Street Parking per Block ........................... E-28
E9. Existing Off-Street Parking per Block ........................... E-29
E 10. Existing Transit Routes ...................................... E-31
E11. New SR 304 Configuration ................................... E-32
El2. 2020 Traffic Forecasts ....................................... E-33
V
Charleston Community Plan
REFERENCES
· Bremerton Comprehensive Plan (1995)
· Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/1986 Bremerton Comprehensive
Plan, 1995
· Environmental Impact Statement SR 304 Bremerton to Gorst, 1996
APPENDICES
A. Distribution List
B. Ordinance Adopting Plan (available after City Council action)
C. Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Specific Area C-2
D. History of Charleston (to be added later)
E. Proposed Zone: Charleston District (CD)
F. Planned Action
G. Residential Valuations (unpublished)
H. Business District Inventory (unpublished)
I. Background Information and Examples
vi
Final
Charleston Community Plan
June 18, 1997
Charleston Community Plan
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Charleston Community Plan is to identify concerns of
the people who live, work, or own property in the Charleston area, and to
set forth strategies for addressing these concerns. This plan will help
guide development in the area over the coming 20 years.
The Charleston Community Plan is an "Integrated GMA/SEPA Plan". It
was produced under a pilot program intended to bring together plans
produced under the state Growth Management Act (GMA) with
environmental analysis required by the State Environmental Policy Act
(S~P^).
Relationship to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
The City adopted a new Bremerton Comprehensive Plan in 1995. This plan
was an update of the City's 1986 Comprehensive Plan to bring it into
conformance with requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA) of 1990
as revised.
The £remerton Comprehensive Plan is a 20-year plan. It articulates a "vision"
of a desired future the City will strive to create. This citywide plan provides
broad policy direction to guide City actions over the coming years. It also
identifies the Charleston Business District as a "Specific Area" for further study.
(See Appendix B - Bremerton Comprehensive ?lan Specific Area C-2)
The City will use the general policy statements in the Charleston
Community Plan to guide future decisions involving development
proposals and plan amendments affecting the area. More specifically, the
City will use the Plan to integrate neighborhood needs into the City's
budget process, Six-Year Street Improvement Program, Parks and
Recreation Comprehensive Plan, and other planning and funding
programs.
This Community Plan is intended to be used by City officials as input in
developing more specific work programs and in establishing citywide
funding priorities. Many of the recommendations contained in the Plan
are conceptual only, and may need to be analyzed in greater detail, both
individually and in relationship to other recommendations. Funding
sources may not exist for implementing all of the recommendations
P-1
Charleston Community Plan
identified in the Plan. Some of the actions identified in the Plan are
intended to be initiated and implemented by members of the Charleston
community.
The Community Planning Process
The Charleston Community Plan was developed by the City of Bremerton
Department of Community Development with assistance from members of
the Charleston community. It is based on discussions with residents,
business people, and property owners at a series of community meetings
held between October 1996 and April 1997. (See Appendix _ - Charleston
Community Planning Meeting Summaries)
The Plan was adopted by the Bremerton City Council in [June 1997] after
Planning Commission and City Council study sessions and public
hearings. (See Appendix A - Bremerton City Council Ordinance Adopting
Charleston Community Plan)
Overview of the Plan
The Charleston Community Plan is organized into five sections.
· The COMMUNITY PROFILE contains a general description of the
current conditions within the neighborhood.
· The VISION STATEMENT describes the neighborhood's sense of
identify and vision for its future.
~ The COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES section identifies issues that are of
concern to the members of the Charleston community, and potential
action strategies for addressing those concerns.
· The IMPLEMENTATION section recommends various follow-up
actions that should be taken by the City to help implement the plan.
P-2
Charleston Communi~. Plan
COMMUNITY PROFILE
The Charleston Community is located in west central Bremerton along the
east slope of Capital Hill. It is generally bounded on the:
West -- by Forest Ridge Park and the Capital Hill ridge top
· North -- by 13th Street
East -- by Montgomery-Rainier-Bloomington Streets and PSNS
· South -- by the city limits
OST1~CH
BAY
;
............ ~'~; P1 Location Map
P-3
Charleston Community Plan
The Charleston Community is an established area that has seen little new
construction in recent years. The focus of the community is the
Charleston Business District, which serves all of Central Bremerton.
While the dominant landform is Capital Hill, the dominant built feature is
the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard.
The business district core consists of a mix of retail and personal service
uses. Except for the new Safeway grocery store, most business buildings
are reminders of earlier and more prosperous times. Several empty
storefronts, a few small houses, and a closed theater interrupt the
continuity of the district. The business core is flanked by a mix of retail
and industrial type uses on the south, west, and east.
The east slope of business district is flanked by residential areas on the
west, north and east. There is a wide mix of single family and multiple
family housing. The character of the residential areas varies significantly.
Some neighborhoods are tidy and stable, with well-kept, older homes.
Hillside areas enjoy scenic views of Mt. Rainier and Sinclair Inlet. Other
areas are plagued by poorly maintained homes with little evidence of pride
in ownership.
The Charleston area is the gateway to Bremerton from the south.
Highway 303 runs through the area, connecting the Bremerton Ferry
Terminal in downtown Bremerton to Tacoma, Olympia and points south
via State Highway 3. Other main cross-city arterials serving the area are
1 lth Street and Kitsap Way-to-6th Street.
Except for Forest Ridge Park on the hilltop, there are no parks within the
planning area. The nearest school is Naval Avenue Elementary School, a
few blocks east of the area. The Summit Avenue Church is a long-time
landmark at the south end of the area.
Historic Heritage
Charleston enjoys a unique place in the history of Bremerton and Kitsap
County. The t~vvrt C!~ of Charleston was incorporated as a company
town in 1893 It was: ......... ~ :-*~
· ,~,~,,,~, ........... C6h~S61idhted~ith the City of
Bremerton in 1927. A brief sketch of the history of Charleston is
included in the. APPendices. (See Appendix )
P-4
Charleston Community Plan
VISION STATEMENT
The ;9remerton Comprehensive Plan is based on an overall "vision"
describing the city's preferred future. This vision is presented in Plan
Element "B" - The k'isionfor £remerton - in the form of' a series o£ vision
statements that describe the future the City will strive to achieve.
The Vision for Bremerton
The Vision for Bremerton Element includes a number of vision statements.
These statements establish the base upon which the Charleston
Community Plan will expand. Those most applicable to the Charleston
Community Plan are listed below.
Bremerton - 20 Years From Now
The comprehensive planning process involves an assessment of our
community's strengths and weaknesses, problems, and opportunities for
improvement. Through our visions, goals, and courses of action, we can
greatly influence our future by directing change. The following vision
statements will show us the direction we intend to go and where we will be
twenty years from now.
A. During the next twenty years, Bremerton will experience the greatest
population and development increases since World War II. The new
growth will be planned, properly serviced, and accepted with care to
ensure that it will be beneficial and not disruptive to the community.
B. Bremerton will be economically stronger than it is today, with a
greater diversification of commercial and industrial activity, a wider
range of job types and salary levels, and a higher level of economic
independence.
H. Neighborhoods will continue to evolve, improve, and become more
attractive, comfortable, and desirable. They will_provide a greater
variety of housing options, affordable to a larger share of the market,
and will become stronger and more stable as the proportion of owner-
occupants gradually increases.
P-5
Charleston Community Plan
Neighborhoods
The quality and stability of neighborhoods are indicators ora community's
overall health. We generally associate "quality" with a number of factors that
include the level of property maintenance, neighborhood pride, peace and quiet,
and the nature and style of the architecture, landscaping, and overall design.
Bremerton has a great variety of housing choices. Some neighborhoods are in
need of protection while others need rehabilitation or, in some cases,
redevelopment.
A. Bremerton will continue to provide homes for Naval personnel and workers
from all sectors of the local economy, retirees, Seattle commuters, and
others.
B. We will continue to strive for a variety and a good balance of housing
opportunities for all economic and social segments of the community.
C. I'Ve will see a greater emphasis on home ownership as a means of achieving
a higher degree of neighborhood maintenance andpride, and to offer the
American dream of home ownership to more Bremerton residents.
D. In order to achieve a higher level of home ownership, a greater emphasis
will be placed on the provision of small, private, affordable single-family
homes, both in new subdivisions and as "in-fill" within existing
neighborhoods. Condominiums and other forms of ownership will increase
in popularity.
Jaristoric preservation will play a greater role in Bremerton's future as
certain unique areas and structures are recognized for their historical value.
F. Neighborhood quality, safety, stability, and affordability will be given
increased consideration in all community improvement programs.
G. Bremerton will support its neighborhoods through greater availability of
community services and improved maintenance of streets and other public
facilities.
The Vision for the Charleston Community
The Vision for the Charleston Community is consistent with the Vision for
Bremerton. It refines and focuses the citywide vision to address
neighborhood concerns. When implemented, the Charleston Community
Plan should help make the following vision a reality.
P-6
Charleston Community Plan
Community Identity and Character
The Charleston Community is a friendly small, self-contained "town"
within a city. People live and work here. Residents live in a range of
attractive housing types, from single family bungalows to mid-rise
townhouses. It is a pleasant walk from home to town, a convenient bike
ride to market and to work. There is a certain historic "flavor", without
being overdone. Historic homes and buildings are colorfully and
sensitively refurbished. At the same time, fresh, new buildings blend in
and punctuate the scene.
Business District
The Charleston Business District has been revitalized to become the retail,
service and social center of the Charleston community. Retail shops and
services provide for most daily needs. The district is framed by clusters of
lacy street trees. There are pleasant landscaped sitting areas, outdoor
eating spots, and even some children's play sculpture to add interest for
pedestrians. Awnings protect pedestrians from occasional inclement
weather, and add a sense of continuity to the street scene. Kiosks include
bus route information and space for handbills promoting special events.
Wide, textured street crossings let drivers know that this is a pedestrian-
friendly area. New "old-style" street lights and the old Moeller clock are
reminders of Charleston's historic importance. The old theater has been
given new life, and features special film showings and occasional special
events. Friendly "bike cops" patrol the area, adding a sense of safety and
stability, and helping visitors find their way about. You can hop a colorful
shuttle bus downtown when you want a change of scene, and small groups
of tourists frequently ride the shuttle to visit the district.
P-7
Charleston Community Plan
COMMUNITY PLAN
Introduction
The Charleston Business District, Bremerton's oldest, has been serving its
surrounding residential community and the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
for more than a century. Many of its older residential and commercial
buildings are showing the effects of time. But there are signs of a
resurgence of interest in surrounding neighborhoods where homes have
been remodeled and are now considered classic examples of their era.
Many of the commercial buildings have been remodeled and repaired
numerous times over the years and the heart of the district along Callow is
still interspersed with a few remaiaing homes.
Charleston has too much historical significance, functional importance,
and quality of life potential to ignore. Thus, this community plan has been
prepared in pursuit of the following basic objectives:
To stimulate communication, new ideas and citizen involvement in the
community plan.
To provide guidance for future change and improvements.
To assist the decision-making process by providing a solid basis for
decisions.
To correct identified problems.
To ensure that Charleston will continue to be an active and viable business
center, maintaining its unique character while providing for the community's
basic needs.
To preserve the most important positive characteristics that make the
community and its business district functional, interesting, and historically
significant.
~ To work toward a stable and functional business district that is inviting and
convenient to park, walk, browse, eat and shop in a comfortable, safe and
attractive environment.
To ensure a stable and affordable residential community that is adequately
served by utilities and municipal facilities and services, and that is
accessible, safe and attractive.
P-8
Charleston Community Plan
Plan Proposal Development
Several neighborhood meetings were held early in the planning process to
gather information and establish the foundation of the Plan. A slide
presentation and "visioning" exercise stimulated thought and new ideas.
During and between meetings, valuable input was gathered from
Charleston area businesses, property owners and residents. A set of Plan
Proposals was drafted and offered for discussion at a neighborhood
meeting on December 10, 1996. After reviewing and considering all
comments, the "draft" proposals were revised by City planning staff to
become Plan Proposals.
The Community Plan proposals are presented in nine categories that
generally coincide with the elements of the citywide Comprehensive Plan.
All proposals were initiated by City staff or as a result of public input.
They were discussed, refined and modified through the process of
neighborhood meetings and public hearings prior to final consideration by
the City Council and adoption of the Plan. Since all proposals must be
realistic and consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, the
Charleston Community Plan contains only those that were found to be
most appropriate, effective, and feasible.
This Plan is adopted as part of Bremerton's citywide Comprehensive Plan
and is subject to the same amendment procedures. Although the Plan
looks 20 years into the future, it is subject to ongoing review and revision
to keep it current. Amendments to the Charleston Plan may be made once
each year. Zoning adjustments may be made at any time, provided they
are consistent with the Plan.
Land Use Proposals
The Vision Guides the Plan
This is a 20-year plan. The Plan was developed around a "vision" of what
the most desirable future would look like. In turn, the Plan Proposals were
designed to bring that vision to life. During the life of this plan, a number
of changes could occur within the Charleston community. For example,
the business district could continue to deteriorate with little or no new
construction. Low rents and old buildings could attract a less desirable
P-9
Charleston Community Plan
mix of businesses. Blighting influences could spread to nearby
neighborhoods. Retail businesses could give up and move to shopping
centers and strip malls, leaving the district for high-density residential
development, or auto repair, parking lots, warehousing, or other non-retail
land uses.
The "preferred vision", on which this Plan is based, provides a positive
outlook. It would see the Charleston Business District physically
improved and revitalized to become the retail, service and social center of
the Charleston community. The surrounding residential neighborhoods
would improve in appearance and livability, historic homes would be
preserved, properties would be well maintained, old sidewalks would be
repaired and new ones installed, and parking and traffic problems would
be corrected.
Policy 1: Work together with property owners, residents and merchants to
carry out this Plan in pursuit of the "preferred vision", as stated in
the Vision Statement section and summarized above.
Policy 2: Keep the adopted "vision" and Plan proposals in mind when
developing new policies, guidelines and regulations to ensure that
they will support and implement the vision.
Adjustments Will Accommodate Change
The changes that will result from adoption and implementation of this plan
will affect the Citywide Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and
Map, the City's Capital Facilities Program, Parks Plan, and various
budgets. The proposals should also influence how the property owners
and merchants of the Charleston Business District maintain and improve
their properties, grow their businesses, and conduct business cooperatively
as an organized district.
Action A: Consider all proposals contained in the Charleston Plan for funding
and implementation during the life of the Plan.
P-10
!' ~ ? Naval A ....
Elementary
Ridge I~TI;
Park
3-8 dwellings per acre
~DR ~edium Densi~ Residential
8-18 dwellings per acre
HDR High Densi~ Residential
More than 18 dwellings per acre
CD Charleston District
~,.=a~ C-G General & Highway Commercial
T Transpo~tion (Kitsap Transit)
~']'~ ~] '~ ;':: P Park
S School
~ Open Space
,-. :, : ,...::., ~SNS Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
I/
P-11
Charleston Community Plan
Action B: Adjust area zoning to accommodate the Gorst Connector highway
improvements, to encourage higher density residential development
and infill surrounding the business district, to maintain the lower-
density hillside neighborhoods, and to ensure that the Zoning Map is
consistent with the Plan Map.
Action C: Adopt a new "CD" zone tailored specifically for the Charleston
Business District and designed to encourage a mix of land uses that
will strengthen the pedestrian-oriented business core. Uses which
might undermine district goals should be removed. For example,
auto-oriented uses might only be allowed outside the pedestrian
core, while adult businesses might not be permitted anywhere in the
zone.
Revised Plan and Zoning Maps will guide change
The Charleston Community Plan includes both a text and a map. Both are
adopted as part of the city-wide Comprehensive Plan and will provide the
foundation for zoning regulation to implement the Plan on a daily basis.
Action A: Amend the City's Comprehensive Plan Map to incorporate the
Charleston Community Plan map, as adopted.
Action B: Amend the City's Official Zoning Map to include the new "CD"
zone and adjustments to other zones as necessary to achieve
consistency with the Charleston Community Plan map.
Transportation Proposals
Providing Good Public Streets and Sidewalks
Quality public streets and safe sidewalks are essential to the continued
improvement of the Charleston neighborhood. Currently, many hillside
residential streets are substandard or in need of repair and many have no
sidewalks at all. High quality attractive streets contribute greatly to a
neighborhood's image, desirability and value.
Action A: Develop a priority system for neighborhood street improvements.
[The priority system should help ensure good vehicular access to all
properties and a system of sidewalks that will encourage local
residents to walk throughout their neighborhood and to local
businesses.]
P-12
Charleston Camm unity Plan
ACtiOn B: Investigate the feaSibility of rightzturn-in and rightTtum-out lanes on
the west side of CallOw at First Street.
Taking Advantage of Bus Service
As vehicular congestion worsens throughout the city and county, bus
service will become increasingly important. In turn, scheduling and
overall convenience will improve and Kitsap Transit will expand its
facilities between Wycoff and Callow. Charleston is in a location to
benefit from improved public transit.
Action A: Work with Kitsap Transit to improve bus services to the Callow
Avenue corridor, particularly between Burwell and Eleventh Streets,
and provide bus shelters with scheduling information in convenient
locations. The :Ci~ recognizes tli~it ~ny:inci-eaS~s 6r changes' to ~
servJc~ along, Call6W.,will be d~p~ndent Oh re~ourc~ :to~stai~ 'ii ~gv
se~iceand;6h de~and f0r, and rid~rShip 6~ that se~ic~z It~is
understo6d tlmt hdditi6nM ~ervie~ w0fild ;h'ave26 b'e 's~pP0~d b~ th~
c6mmuni~; including the m~rcharitg! in :the :district, t6 ~iis~?e' its
Success.
Action B: Modify curb radiuses at corners as necessary to facilitate bus turning
movements onto Callow. In addifiofi~ eh§ute ~hat anyi%pe6d
humps" designed for traffi~ cAlking'need to b~ designed so as ~ot to
adversely affect the abili~ of buses to S~i~e: th~ stree* at a
reas6nable s~edi
Action C: Investigate the feasibility of providing a shuttle bus service
connecting downtown Bremerton with the Charleston Business
District and other points as appropriate.
Preserving the Parking on Callow
It was determined from written comments and through discussion at public
planning meetings that preservation of the on-street parking on Callow
Avenue is essential to the continued success of the business district. On-
street parking helps meet short-term convenience parking and loading
needs and also separates pedestrians from moving traffic.
Policy 1: Continue to maintain two lanes of moving traffic on Callow with
parallel parking on both sides for the foreseeable future.
P-I3
Charleston Community Plan
Action A: Review the on-street parking limits on Callow Avenue and consider
adjustments that will shorten time limits to prevent long-term
parking and to increase the turn-over and availability.
Providing Parking that Serves the Needs
Most parking lots that surround the core of the business district are
privately owned and many are related to individual businesses. Small
businesses with no off-street parking of their own rely on public lots and
on-street parking for their employees ~and customers, while some large
nearby lots sit idle. The existing imbalance of parking can be corrected
through creativity and cooperation.
Policy 1: Encourage property owners to work together to remove barriers and
redesign private parking lots to provide larger, more efficient
parking areas. Cross-parking agreements or easements may be used
and fees may be charged to help pay for the improvements and
ongoing maintenance.
Policy 2: Encourage the private sector to develop new accessory and
commercial parking lots to serve the Charleston District.
Policy 3: Seek opportunities to develop new public parking lots or a parking
structure to help serve the District's parking needs.
Policy 4: Work with Kitsap Transit and local businesses to provide incentives
for employees to walk, bicycle, car pool or ride a bus to work so that
more parking spaces are available for customers.
Putting Parking in the Right Locations
Parking lot location is important to the function of the business district.
However, parking should be viewed as a secondary function of the district
and not more important than the core's primary function of providing
retail businesses and services. The heart of the primary business area is
along both sides of Callow, between Eleventh and Burwell. It is
important to protect the commercial nature of this corridor, improve
existing businesses, make the district more compact, replace
nonconforming uses and structures, and fill in the vacant lots with new
businesses or a mix of business and residential. The more intense the
district gets, the more attractive and interesting it will become as a place
for pedestrian activity. However, if buildings are removed and not
P-14
Charleston Community P Jan
replaced, or replaced with parking lots, the intensity of the business district
will be diluted. Parking lots should be nearby and convenient, but should
not share the important Callow Avenue frontage with the primary
businesses.
Policy 1: Encourage the development of parking lots along alleys or fronting
on Montgomery and Wycoff Avenues. Prevent or discourage new
lots that front directly on Callow between Eleventh and Burwell.
Policy 2: Use narrow vacant lots, when opportunities arise, to provide
pedestrian and vehicular access from Callow to parking areas
located behind buildings.
Action A: Develop regulations and/or design guidelines to prevent or
discourage new parking lots fronting directly on Callow between
Eleventh and Burwell.
ActionB: consider forming apubliC degelopment authori~r6 e6nstmct pUblic
p~king 10~S iafid/0[ parl<ihg ~p¢~ures:
Rediscovering the Pedestrian
The automobile gets most of the attention in the Charleston business
district. Streets and acres of parking lots surround the business core.
Sidewalks are available on Callow and some other streets, but pedestrians
are often placed in positions of direct conflict with traffic. More often
than not, sidewalks are lined with parked cars, interrupted by utility poles
and sign posts, and have very little, if any, landscaping to separate or
soften the edges between the "people zone" and the "motor vehicle zone".
An important challenge in the revitalization of the business district will be
to create a pedestrian-friendly em, ironment in which people will want to
visit, browse and stay awhile.
Policy 1: Encourage merchants to better attract and accommodate pedestrian
traffic by providing attractive window displays, awnings, benches,
flower boxes and planters, outdoor dining in the summer, sidewalk
sales, and other appropriate events within the District.
Policy 2: Require clear pedestrian linkages between parking lots and
businesses, betwveen blocks, and between PSNS and the business
district in the design of new development and rehabilitation projects.
P-15
Charleston Community Plan
Policy 3: Coordinate sidewalks, trails, path~vays, stairways, and other
pedestrian ways as elements of an overall "system" intended to
provide safe and convenient access to and through the business
district from all surrounding neighborhoods.
Action A: Review and adjust development codes as necessary to ensure that all
major improvements to streets, parking areas and other property will
include adequate sidewalks, lighting, signing, and other features
intended to assist the pedestrian in getting to and from local
destinations.
Action B: Investigate the feasibility of a crosswalk on Callow at First Street.
A~tibn C: Bii~ell iS~'e~tT~!!l Climb. i
1. Narr0~th~:c/irlsX, tO~:eu~b~idth~'of-Bfirw~ll from Wyc0ff
eastwhrd'~6 the'~hlley loac¢OmmOdate 0n'e:hine oftfhffie inan
eastb0Und'.d!i~e~fibn7':' The~e'!mpro'vemen~ts ~0~!d:~el
and signe'd inI, adeo~danc~ _Witch City s~ree.'.'ps:~h~ards'.'~n~l ,W0uld
include proy!~si6:h~S~;fo?ia~¢gS~O p[i~a~' Pi:0ise~¢~i~aS,neeessary.
2. Create a'podostfianzfriendly ~"hill :cli~b'."ls~eoncall6W and
Wyc0ff; corisis~tihg
lighfi.ng,' !and?cgp!:~g an¢
3: continue.th~'pe~6~?~igp~sS/~te,~ 6fsildew. alk'~;, !and?,eal~ing:
lighting a~d ~geet'!trees'Wes~tw0ra'~rorfi Wy~0.,ffi}pF(~!-est Ridge
Park2
Action C: Sixth Street Hill c!imbi, :Re~ain~and imPlrgve:th~ s~gment of Sixth
Street ROW b~e~..ri.'wy96ff and ~ambrian with ~/hatTd Surface
walkway,~?npr~Oyed~qa3'd~eaping; n!ght lightifig.hhd 0thei~
appropriate featui-es:_
Actii~n:D: COnSider pr0vidihg:pedestrian'~tecess points:fr6m nev~Tcul-de-sacs to
the re66nfi ~i/fed'SK30z[' (Bfe~ert6ri "Gatew~i¥'~) 15i'~15wa¥3
Reducing the Impact of Major Arterials
The Charleston District enjoys direct access via several arterial streets.
But these streets are also major barriers to pedestrian movement within the
districL Eleventh, Sixth and Burwell Streets are intimidating rivers of
P-16
Charleston Community Plan
motor vehicles that divide the district physically and psychologically.
Pedestrian crossings are wide and uncomfortable, and they interrupt the
continuity of the district. Open parking lots at intersections add to the
distance, the amount of asphalt, and the numbers of vehicles, and make
intersections appear even wider and more difficult.
By reducing these effects, the north and south blocks of the business
district can be better tied together and pedestrian travel successfully
promoted. Similar treatment at Eleventh will encourage people to walk
into the district from the north. The proposed highway improvements and
widening of Burwell will include special treatments on that route as well
to ensure a safe pedestrian crossing for those who reside south of Burwell
and those within PSNS.
Action A: Combine development regulations, design standards and
architectural design to bring buildings close to intersections,
resulting in a visually narrower street corridor and shorter pedestrian
distance between businesses.
Action B: Develop and implement development standards that result in
pedestrian crossings that are more distinct and visible, through the
use of textured concrete, colored pavers, or painted crosswalks, to
emphasize the importance of these locations as pedestrian areas.
Action C: Install one or more "speed humps" on Callow Avenue as mid-block
pedestrian crossings, and consider other traffic calming devices that
will slow traffic while enhancing pedestrian safety.
Action D: Explore the possibility of closing Burwell between Callow and
Wycoff to improve traffic safety and enhance pedestrian circulation.
Dealing with Bypass Traffic
When too many motorists use the less traveled residential streets as short-
cuts to avoid congestion, signals and other delays, it becomes a
neighborhood problem. The Gorst Connector project will reduce bypass
opportunities by closing some intersections and enhancing the movement
of traffic on the primary arterials. Even with those improvements, there
will continue to be bypass traffic within the neighborhoods. A certain
amount is necessary and acceptable, but when bypass traffic exceeds
acceptable levels or is concentrated on certain streets, it may be time to
initiate additional "traffic calming" strategies.
P-17
Charleston Community Plan
Policy 1: Continue to investigate ways to discourage bypass traffic in
residential neighborhoods. Possibilities under consideration include
cul-de-sac streets, speed "humps", "bulbing" out curbs at
intersections, additional trees and landscaping, and other "traffic
calming" devices.
Promoting Transportation Alternatives
The Charleston Community is very auto-oriented. Those who prefer to
walk or ride bicycles must deal with incomplete facilities, conflicts with
motor vehicle traffic, and other inconveniences. Bus routes pass through
the area but not along Callow Avenue in the heart of the business district,
Policy 1: Work with Kitsap Transit to provide more convenient bus service or
a special shuttle bus to connect the Charleston District with
downtown Bremerton and other key West Bremerton locations.
Policy 2: Seek opportunities in public improvements and private
developments to provide bikeways, bike lanes on existing streets,
and other bicycle facilities that will encourage bicycle travel to and
within the Charleston community.
Policy 3: Work with Kitsap Transit, PSNS, and local merchants to establish
and promote programs to encourage the use of car pools, bicycles,
or buses (from park-n-ride lots) rather than driving.
Action A: Implement the sidewalk proposals and other pedestrian
improvements proposals recommended in this Plan through Site
Plan Review or proposed developments and application of design
standards.
ACti6n.B: ProVide bilge rout~gigfiifigthr6ugtith~Chm'I~st6filare~:as
appropriat~i
Housing Proposals
The primary housing goal of the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan is to
encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments
of the population, promote a variety of residential densities and housing
types, and encourage preservation of the existing housing stock.
P-18
Charleston Community Plan
The neighborhoods that surround the Charleston Business District are
already varied in density, housing types, styles, and costs. This is one of
the most affordable urban neighborhoods in Kitsap County and is showing
signs of renewed interest and revitalization. However, it's also an older
neighborhood that may be vulnerable to deterioration, traffic impacts and
other negative influences. Care must be taken to recognize the needs of
these neighborhoods and to provide the types and levels of encouragement
and assistance needed to ensure continued rehabilitation and maintenance.
Special attention should be paid to housing opportunities related to the
proximity of the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard. For example, housing
types tailored to the off-base needs of military ships personnel may be
especially appropriate.
Policy 1: Encourage the continued revitalization and maintenance of the local
housing stock through incentives and strict code enforcement.
Policy 2: Promote efforts to identify, rehabilitate and preserve homes having
historical/architectural significance.
Policy 3: Promote housing types designed to meet the special needs of
military personnel.
Action A: Establish the general Charleston neighborhood as a "target area" for
code enforcement and housing rehabilitation efforts, including Iow-
interest loan programs.
Action B: Promote use of the City of Bremerton's low-interest loan programs
that focus on such major building elements as roofing, plumbing and
electrical systems, and that can also be used for aesthetic elements
such as outside painting and repair or replacement of damaged
siding.
Action C: Promote use of the City's Homebuyer Assistance Program to
maximize affordable housing opportunities for new homeowners.
Action D: Designate low-density and medium-density housing as "planned
actions" to encourage revitalization of the housing stock.
Action E: Develop residential design guidelines to help owners and developers
achieve projects of consistent quality. Guidelines might include:
Useable front porches.
· Front yard design and street orientation.
· Trees and landscaping that are attractive and effective.
· Affordable and historically appropriate materials and siding.
P-19
Charleston Community Plan
Roof pitches and dormers that reflect neighborhood character.
· Doors, windows and trim details.
Creative density and site planning.
Economic Health
Improving the Mix of Businesses
The business district does not consist of the proper balance of businesses
and services that are needed to serve the surrounding neighborhood.
Some important types of businesses are missing and some existing
businesses are considered "undesirable" and may be adversely affecting
other businesses and the viability of the district itself. When particular
uses or businesses have blighting influences on the district or are a
deterrent to potentia! shoppers, adjustments may be necessary to achieve a
more desirable mix of land uses and businesses.
The proximity of PSNS, particularly the new home port facilities, to the
business district provides unique opportunities for the district. A recent
count of the PSNS resident population totaled over 5,400 military
personnel and dependents, including over 600 in enlisted and officers
quarters and over 4,700 on ships. These people will be living and working
within walking distance of the Charleston business district. While the
base is providing for basic shopping and recreation needs, the district
should be able to provide a diversity of eating, shopping and recreation
establishments that will improve the quality of life for those residents and
add needed pedestrian activity to the district. (See Appendix'T~7 PSNS
Map)
Policy 1: Promote a healthy balance of businesses and services within the
Charleston District to serve the surrounding neighborhoods and
PSNS.
Action A: Design a "Charleston District" zone that includes the most desirable
mixture of land uses and businesses to strengthen the pedestrian-
oriented business core. Amend the City's Zoning Ordinance
accordingly and "phase out" undesirable nonconforming uses over
time.
Action B: Determine what the ideal mixture of businesses would be for the
Charleston District and attempt to recruit the missing links.
P - 20
Charleston Community Plan
Organizing the Merchants
Organizing the individual businesses of an entire district into a
coordinated "team" is not a simple task. However, a good organization
could strengthen the district and benefit all businesses. There have been
many successful programs in other communities and similar business
districts. We can learn from those programs. Through the organizational
structure, individual businesses could participate in promotional and
advertising activities that would benefit everyone. Such an organization
could also work with the City to develop a coordinated urban design
approach for the district (e.g. for street furnishings and design guidelines).
The public would then begin to view Charleston as a single "shopping
district" rather than an assortment of individual businesses that are
competing against each other rather than working together. It's important
to change this public perception and image to one that is more positive.
Policy 1: Work with the local Chamber of Commerce to encourage the
organization of the Charleston Business District merchants, and
assist, as appropriate, in its activities.
Policy 2: Encourage local merchants to consider the establishment of a
Business Improvement Association (BIA) or "Main Street" type
program to provide financial, promotional and organizational
assistance to District merchants.
Action A: Offer a challenge to Charleston business district merchants and
property owners: If the businesses will form an association, the City
will earmark city funds for improvements to the district (e.g.
signage, street trees, lighting, benches, amenities). Further, the City
will assist the association to put together a grant application(s),
using the earmarked funds for a match, to achieve some of the goals
of the district.
Increasing Clientele Access
If the public can't get to the businesses easily and conveniently, then
they'll go elsewhere to shop. Ensuring adequate access is critical to the
District' s health.
Policy 1: Encourage property owners to provide improved long-term parking
behind businesses and along Montgomery and Wycoff Avenues.
Connect these lots to Callow with well-lighted attractive pedestrian
walkways.
P-21
Charleston Community Plan
Policy 2: Promote the Transportation Alternatives that are proposed under the
heading "Transportation Proposals" to increase accessibility.
Policy 3: Ensure that the residents of surrounding neighborhoods and PSNS
can walk to the business district on safe, well-lighted sidewalks.
Action A: Shorten the time limits for Callow Avenue on-street parking to
increase parking turn-over and make those spaces available more
frequently. (30 min. to 1 hour limits are suggested.)
Capital Facilities and Utilities Proposals
Meeting the Utilities Demands of Future Growth
Utilities must meet the demands of future growth. State law requires the
City to ensure that the levels of growth and development that we plan for
can be adequately served by the necessary utilities and services.
Action A: Initiate and complete City utility improvements to ensure that future
developments, as proposed in this Plan, will be adequately served.
Action B: Complete the Callow Avenue Basin Storm Drainage Separation
project, including the SR304/Cambrian, Rogers, and
Callow/Montgomery phases.
Action C: Complete the 24" Water Transmission Main on First Street.
Considering Public Uses
A neighborhood or community center may be a suitable addition to the
Charleston area. Such a center might be established within or on the
periphery of the business district, possibly as a temporary use in an
existing building. The center might be used for neighborhood meetings,
social events, recreational activities, public information, or as a casual
meeting place. Over the years there has been much discussion of locating
an indoor recreation facility somewhere on the west side of town. The
Parks and Recreation Department has been supportive of this idea, but has
cautioned that the Department would need to determine what the needs
are, what services should be provided, and to what extent the community
could support the development of such a facility and its on-going
P - 22
Charleston Community Plan
maintenance and operation. With its central location and good bus
service, the Charleston area may be an ideal area for such a facility if it
should be built.
Policy 1: Encourage an existing community organization to establish and
operate a neighborhood/community center, in cooperation with the
City's Parks and Recreation Department, in an existing building.
Action A: Include in a bond issue, a Central Bremerton Community Center that
is accessible to the Charleston community. Such a center could
include a small law enforcement office and/or other information and
government services to the community.
Action B: Review the City's zoning regulations to ensure that neighborhood
and/or community facilities can be permitted in the most appropriate
locations.
Enhancing Police Protection
Crime statistics appear to be decreasing in Bremerton and particularly in
the Charleston District. The removal of a pocket of problem properties in
the South Montgomery area for PSNS expansion had very positive results.
Crime is no longer concentrated in the Charleston District. Even so, there
remains a perception that "crime", or the threat of crime, is a very serious
concern in this area. This perception may be reinforced by an appearance
of blight and neglect in parts of the district. While police protection could
be enhanced in response to this perception, it may be even more important
to "spruce up" the district to replace indications that "no one cares" with
evidence of community pride.
Action A: Cooperate with local merchants and property owners to assess the
presence and levels of crime-related factors throughout the
Charleston neighborhood, including inadequate street lighting, gang
activity, graffiti, vandalism, security devices, and statistical trends to
determine what the actual problems are and what might be done.
Action B: Continue to promote the "Block Watch" program as an effective tool
in dealing with neighborhood crime.
Action C: Consider increasing the level of police visibility and pei-sonalized
service, possibly through walking or bicycling beats so that the
officers meet the merchants and local residents personally and
routinely.
P - 23
Charleston Community Plan
Action D: Consider establishing a police presence in the district by staffing a
small "storefront" office, if appropriate space is donated or
otherwise provided. (Also see "Considering Public Uses" Action
A.)
Recreation Proposals
Improving the Community with Parks and Open Space
Parks and Open Space will improve the community. The planned
improvements to the Gorst Connector project will include new landscaped
open space along the highway right-of-way. This will help buffer the
neighborhood from traffic and improve the visual impact of this entrance
to Bremerton but will not provide new recreational facilities. This part of
Bremerton appears to be deficient in public parks and recreational
facilities.
Action A: Acquire properties that are uniquely suitable for the development of
neighborhood parks, playgrounds, or other public uses and make up
for local deficiencies in those categories.
Action B: Provide, in cooperation with local property owners and merchants,
one or more small "vest pocket" passive parks within the business
district where pedestrians might relax on a park bench while eating
an ice cream cone, reading a newspaper or awaiting a bus.
Action C: Develop a pedestrian "Hill Climb" along Burwell between Callow
and Forest Ridge Park. At a minimum, this would include a distinct
landscaped walkway to encourage pedestrian travel betwveen the
park and business district. It could also include a small park
between Callow and Wycoff if part or all of that section is closed to
traffic (see Reducing the Impact of Major Arterials Action D). (Se~
P - 24
Charleston Community Plan
Urban Design Proposals
Encouraging Improvements
Bremerton's oldest business district is showing its age. Many of its older
commercial buildings have been remodeled numerous times, have lost
their original architectural style, don't meet the needs of today's tenants,
and should be replaced. The presence of a few remaining old houses and
vacant lots suggest opportunities for commercial "in-fill" along Callow
Avenue and surrounding areas. Signs of all types and sizes clash with
each other, utility lines clutter the views, and the mixture of facade
treatments demonstrates the absence of a design theme or other
architectural coordination that might help tie the district together visually.
Policy 1: Encourage property owners to remove buildings that have outlived
their usefulness and to redevelop those properties with new
buildings that better meet local needs.
Policy 2: Encourage property owners to preserve and maintain older buildings
that have retained their historical character or unique architectural
style.
Action A: Modify City development regulations and standards to promote
development that is most characteristic of the district and its
objectives. This might result in reduced parking and setback
requirements, promotion of mixed use development, additional
landscaping flexibility, etc.
Action B: Adopt a new Charleston District (CD) zone, tailored specifically to
this area and its objectives, and including uses that could be
approved as "planned actions" to streamline the approval process for
expansion and new development.
Action C: Promote the rehabilitation of homes and individual commercial
buildings, and provide financial and design assistance, as resources
are available.
Action D: Provide financial assistance through a coordinated facade
improvement program intended to benefit the business district. This
program will ensure design continuity and will guide individual
improvement projects.
P-25
Charleston Community Plan
Making Signs Work Effectively
The district is cluttered with signs of all types and sizes. There are wall
signs, roof signs, sandwich board signs, reader board signs, directional
signs, traffic signs, promotional banners, and signs that flash, blink, wave
and flutter in the wind. Some are professionally designed while others are
obviously home-made. Some are new and some are badly deteriorated and
barely legible. Many signs are probably not necessary and may actually
be damaging to local business and the overall appearance of the district.
Where each sign competes with those around it, the objectives of
identification and advertising are lost in the visual clutter and lack of
coordination.
.4etlon .4:Assist the local business organization in conducting a detailed sign
inventory, and in initiating a program to remove illegal signs
immediately and to gradually phase out (amortize) nonconforming
signs over time.
.4ction B: Assist the Charleston Business District owners and merchants
organization in developing a distinct sign code to better fit the needs
and objectives of the district.
.4ction C: Place distinct entrance signs on the major arterial streets to let the
motoring public know they are entering a special, unique place and
to increase public awareness of the Charleston Business District.
~ti~ D:'
other am~fiifi~§ :t6 indicate tl~at;:th~ b 16~k b~eefi Fii~t and BU~ell
i~ part of the p!~iet(
Making the Oistrict Warm and Inviting
People like to visit places that are warm, comfortable and inviting.
Pedestrians like to be protected from the sun and rain. They don't mind
walking short distances if they can park close to their destinations, but
they don't like to compete with moving traffic. The more comfortable and
pleasant the environment, the greater distances people will walk.
Distances seem shorter when the environment is friendly, attractive and
pleasant.
P - 26
Charleston Community Plan
There is considerable potential for improving the pedestrian environment
of the Charleston District. There are very few trees and very little
landscaping along Callow Avenue to soften the hard elements of asphalt,
concrete, wood, glass, steel, etc. A few relatively inexpensive
improvements could contribute significantly to a more attractive and
inviting environment. Those improvements must be visible to the
motoring public in order to entice them to stop and experience the district
on foot.
Policy 1: Promote improvements which will increase the attractiveness and
pedestrian comfort of the Charleston District. Examples of
appropriate improvements are shown in the Charleston Community
Urban Design Concept Plan and accompanying sketch on the
following pages.
Action A: Develop a street tree master plan for the area, in cooperation with
the Charleston District merchants, residents, owners, and the City's
Urban Forestry Project, along with a financing proposal to achieve
the desired results. New development will then include appropriate
landscaping and street trees in its improvements.
Action B: Assist the local business organization in the preparation of a
District-wide landscaping and open space plan to further enhance
the pedestrian environment of the District. This plan will include
such recreational elements as mini-parks and a community pathway
system of sidewalks, bikeways, trails, stairways, viewpoints, rest
areas, etc.
Action C: Develop design guidelines for the Charleston District to help owners
and developers achieve projects of consistent quality. These
guidelines might build upon the historic significance of the district.
Guidelines could include:
Pedestrian-friendly features.
Lighting for security without glare.
Parking lot location and design.
· Building scale, material, color and detail
, Landscapes, views and natural features
P - 27
uutd ,41.~unmtuOD uol~oi.~uqD
Charleston Comrnunity Plan
Undergrounding Utility Lines
Those participating in this planning process agreed that overhead utility
lines are eye-sores that seriously affect the visual quality of the district and
the community. The utility poles are often old and deteriorated, littered
with faded garage sale signs, and take up valuable sidewalk and street
right-of-way space that could be better utilized.
Action A: Require most new public and private developments to place their
new utilities underground and encourage the utility companies to
gradually place all utilities underground.
Action B: Encourage the business district organization to sponsor a Local
Improvement District (L.I.D.) to underground utilities in the district,
along with other suitable improvements.
Taking Care of Vacant Lots
Vacant lots can be blighting influences on a neighborhood. The owners
are often heirs, investors, or others who live outside the area and have no
immediate plans to use or develop these properties and little or no interest
in maintaining them. As a result, we have unsightly overgrown lots
littered with trash and debris and often used as dumping grounds for junk,
abandoned autos, etc. These lots have adverse effects on the appearance
and desirability of the neighborhood and on its property values.
Action A: Target the Charleston neighborhood and business district for
increased code enforcement activities to remove junk and debris and
to require a minimum level of property maintenance, in order to
make a dramatic difference in a short period of time.
Action B: Inform the owners of vacant lots about current zoning and
development opportunities, and encourage them to develop in the
best interests of the neighborhood, or to sell.
Action C: Consider the potential of vacant lots for various "public" uses and
the feasibility of acquisition for parks, open space, community
center, or temporary recreational uses until a development is
proposed.
P-31
Charleston Commzmity Plan
Creating a Positive First Impression
The Charleston District should be considered and treated as a major
entrance to Bremerton. It's important to offer a clean, attractive first
impression to visitors entering the City. Kitsap Way (to Eleventh and
Sixth Streets) is one of two major entrances into the City from the west.
The other, via the Charleston Beach Highway (SR-304) and Burwell, will
soon be improved with new landscaping, directional signs and other
improvements that will enhance the community's image from the
southwest. Motorists entering from either direction should get the
impression that something unique, attractive and interesting exists along
Callow Avenue. This is an important crossroads and community center ---
not just another cluster of strip-commercial businesses.
Action A: Invite the Charleston Community to assist in the design of an
attractive entrance sign to be placed at each major arterial street
entry point to let travelers know they are entering "Charleston", or
the "Charleston Business District".
Action B: Encourage the business community to develop its own logo or theme
that will be distinctive and recognizable. That logo or theme will
then be displayed on the entrance sign, used in district advertising,
or used in other applications.
P-32
Charleston Community Plan
IMPLEMENTATION
The preceding Community Plan section listed many actions that will be
needed to implement the recommendations of the Charleston Community
Plan. Some can be taken by the City. Others will depend on private
actions by residents, business people, and property owners. This section
further describes those planning actions that can be initiated by the City.
Proposed Charleston District (CD) Zone
The Charleston business district is currently zoned General Business (GB),
which is the City's most intensive business zoning district. The Zoning
Code describes the GB zone as follows:
This is Bremerton's primary auto-related, highway-oriented, high-intensity
retail and service commercial zone. [t is designed primarily for locations
along arterial streets and allows a wide variety of business and office uses.
The Charleston Community Plan stresses the importance of renovating the
business district in ways that will "create a pedestrian-friendly
environment in which people will want to visit, browse and stay awhile.
For example, the Plan encourages:
· Improving the mix of businesses
· Making signs work effectively
· Making the district warm and inviting
The Plan recommends that a new CD zoning district be created:
Land Use Proposals- Adjustments Will Accommodate Change:
Action C: Adopt a new "CD" zone tailored specifically for the Charleston
Business District and designed to encourage a mix of land uses
that will strengthen the pedestrian-oriented business core. Uses
which might undermine district goals should be removed. For
example, auto-oriented uses might only be allowed outside the
pedestrian core, while adult businesses might not be permitted
anywhere in the zone.
P-33
Charleston Community Plan
Economic Health - Improving the Mix of Businesses Action:
Action A: Design a "Charleston .District" zone that includes the most
desirable mixture of land uses and businesses to strengthen the
jvedestrian-oriented business core. Amend the City's Zoning
Ordinance accordingly and "phase out" undesirable
nonconforming uses over time.
Accordingly, this Draft Plan includes a proposed Charleston District (CD)
zone.
The intent of this zone is to strengthen the business district of the Charleston
neighborhood by ]vroviding a compatible combination of allowed uses to
strengthen the pedestrian-oriented character of the district, along with
development standards that reflect the historical character and design
limitations of the district. The "CD" zone encourages compact and mixed
use development, pedestrian activities, and retail and service businesses. It
includes most of the uses allowed in the "General Business (GB) " and
"Professional Office (PO) "zones, but without some of the larger disruptive
auto-oriented businesses that often locate along highways.
The full text of the proposed Zoning Code amendments is included in the
Appendices of this Draft Plan. Once the Plan is adopted, the CD proposal
will be scheduled for public hearings before the City Council. The
adopted Zoning Code amendments may differ from the proposal, based on
public testimony. (See Appendix
Planned Actions
The Charleston Community Plan identifies the need to encourage
improvements in the business district. It recommends the "Planned
Action" tool as one incentive:
Urban Design Proposals: Encouraging Improvements --
Action B: Adopt a new Charleston District (CD) zone, tailored specifically
to this area and its objectives, and inchtding uses that could be
approved as '`planned actions" to streamline the approval
process for expansion and new development
Housing Proposals:
Action D: Designate low-density and medium-density housing as ''planned
actions" to encourage revitalization of the housing stock.
P-34
Charleston Community Plan
The Planned Action is a new tool added to the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) to help streamline development permits for types of actions
that have received advance environmental analysis. The intent is to
exempt such actions from unnecessary environmental review. Planned
Actions do not require a SEPA "threshold determination" or the
preparation of an environmental impact statement (ELS).
To an applicant who wants to develop a Planned Action, this means the
City will issue the necessary construction permits upon review of a
complete application. To the public, this means that a Planned Action
project can be approved without an opportunity for further public
comment. All public comment on Planned Actions must be made during
the comment period on the draft Integrated GMA/SEPA Plan.
This Plan qualifies as an "Integrated GMA/SEPA Plan" under new State
regulatory reform legislation. As an Integrated Plan, the Plan and EIS are
packaged together. In order that the certain uses may qualify as Planned
Actions, the EIS section of this Integrated Plan addresses the expected
significant impacts of those actions.
Recommendation: Amend the Zoning Code to designate as Planned Actions all
uses specified as allowed uses in the Land Use Tables for
the following zoning districts within the Charleston
Planning Area:
~ All allowed uses in the Charleston District (CD) zoning
district.
All allowed residential uses in the Residential Low-
density (SF & DR), and Residential Medium-density
(MF) zoning districts.
Once a type of project action is designated as a Planned Action in the City
Zoning Code, it will NOT require a threshold determination or the
preparation of an environmental impact statement under SEPA.
NOTICE TO PERSONS REVIEWING Tills DP. AFT PLAN
This Integrated GMA/SEPA Plan includes the necessary environmental
review of all Planned Actions proposed within the Charleston Planning
Area to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Planned
Actions will be required to mitigate any significant impacts identified in
this Integrated Plan as a condition of approval of construction permits, but
they WILL be allowed.
P-35
Charleston Community Plan
The technical requirements for Planned Actions are included in the
Appendices. (See Appendix "F")
Design Guidelines
Design Guidelines can be used to reduce unnecessary adverse aesthetic
and other impacts which may arise from uncoordinated site development.
The Charleston Community Plan recognizes the importance of Design
Guidelines for both the business district and residential areas.
Urban Design Proposals - Making the District Warm and Inviting:
Action C: Develop design guidelines for the Charleston District to help
owners and developers achieve projects of consistent quality.
Guidelines could include:
· Pedestrian-friendly features.
· Lighting for security without glare.
· Parking tot location and design.
· Building scale, material, color and detail.
· Landscapes, views and natural features.
P-36
Charleston Community Plan
Housing Proposals:
Action D: Develop residential design guidelines to help owners and
developers achieve projects of consistent quality. Guidelines
might include:
, Useablefrontporches.
Front yard design and street orientation.
Trees and landscaping that are attractive and effective.
Affordable and historically appropriate materials and siding.
Roof pitches and dormers that reflect neighborhood character.
Doors, windows and trim details.
, Creative density and site planning.
Proposed Design Guidelines
Recommendation: Develop residential and commercial design guidelines to
implement the Charleston CommuniW Plan. Work with
members of the communiV in the development of these
guidelines.
Ill p ~: ~'~ ~- *~ ~ Ci%% ,,~n ~__:__ ~..:~_,:__~ P, cqucst List" will , .... ~,: ........ · ~ a ~w ·
C~ty af grcmcrttn
Design Review Overlay (DRO) Zone
The City's Zoning Code already includes a Design Review Overlay (DRO)
zone. The DRO zone "overlays" any underlying zone to which it applies.
It establishes a specific area within which formal Design Review of
P-37
Charleston Community Plan
proposed projects is required before they can be approved. At present it
applies only to the Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal District. The
DRO zone is described in the Zone Summary table (Figure 120) of the
Zoning Code.
Recommendation: Amend the Zoning Code to designate the CD zone as a
Design Review Overlay (DRO) zone.
Design Review Process
The City's Zoning Code does not now include a process for design review.
(The Downtown Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan lays out a design review
process for applications within the Urban Renewal District, but this
process does not apply elsewhere in the city.) The code will need to be
amended to determine how design review applications will be approved.
Recommendation: Amend the Zoning Code to specify a process for approval of
design review applications. In order to encourage
revitalization of the Charleston District, this process should
be streamlined to minimize delay for projects that comply
with design review guidelines. For example, projects that
do not otherwise require a public hearing could be approved
administratively during the site plan review process.
Capital Improvement Projects
The Charleston Community Plan includes a number of recommendations
that could result in capital facilities expenditures by the City over the
coming years. The Growth Management Act requires the City to identify
future capital facilities needs in its Capital Facilities Element and to
include those it plans to build in the next six years in a six-year finance
plan. This six-year plan is updated each spring in the form of a Capital
Facilities Project List (CFPL). Projects for the upcoming year are then
folded into the annual budget.
The following table includes capital facilities projects which are already
programmed, as well as new projects recommended by this Plan. Those
already programmed are designated with an asterisk (*). The project year
and cost estimates are given where available. (See Table PI.
P-38
Charleston Community Plan
Recommended Capital Facilities in Charleston Area)
ProjeCts listed On.Table P1 are reco~ended for inclusion in the City's
SixzYe~ F~Ce Pro~am~
P-39
Charleston Community Plan
Table Pl. Recommended Capital Facilities in Charleston Area
1997 ] * 24" Water Transmission Main 1st Street I Water rates 1144,000
i:: ::i ::: (: :::::-:::::: :::i:i::ii:i:::!:::::!::~ :7::: i::i:::: ::': :: !::i: ::::!: :i ::i:: :;:: :: ::?: :::::: :::::: ::: :: : 'i:: ::::!:~ ::: i::: i: !?:i :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :i:
1997- * Priority 1, Phase 2 - SPO04/Cambrian Wastewater rates 5,344,000
1998
1997- * Priority 2 - Rogers Wastewater rates 794,000
1998
2002 * Priority 3 - Remainder (Callow / Wastewater rates 4,160,000
Montgomery) *
1997~: ~; SR304';Tf~sii6~ti6fi I~0r0,iemeht various: ~6u~ees: Federal~ 29;000;000
2003; Pfoj ~t,~6n ;~Giit~a~? :P~0j~t~ Sta~ & ~6eal
1997 ~ B'fi~ll ~n C:~I1:6~ ~ W~6ffi Str~t ~ifitehafi~ fuhd l;000
2002 · Resurface Callow / Montgomery Wastewater rates + **
Arterial Street Fund
1998 Storefront Office (w/parking) Donation of space 0
2000 Office in Central Bremerton Community Bond issue 15,000
Center (150 sq.ft. ~ $100/sq.ft.)
After Parking Structure Parking revenue bonds *~
2002
Joint Parking Lots off Montgomery / L.I.D. and/or Revenue **
Wycoff between 1 st / 1 lth Streets bonds
P - 40
Charleston Community Plan
2000 Community Center - somewhere in Central Bond issue / Local park 5,600,000
Bremerton capital funds (1)
Hill Climb Park - Burwell between CBDG (4) / BIA (2) 25,000
Callow/Wycoff
Pocket Parks along Callow btwn 1st - 1 lth CDBG (4) / BIA (2) **
Before Business Improvement Assn. (BIA) or BIA (2) / Hotel/Motel **
2002 merchants association Tax
1997 Pedestrian amenities (sidewalks, trees, CSO project / L.I.D. / **
grates) - Montgomery btwn 1 st/6th BIA / R.E. Excise Tax (3)
2002 Sidewalks, landscaping "bulbs", textured CSO project / L.I.D. / **
crosswalks BIA / R.E. Excise Tax
2002 Street Furnishings (lamps, benches, kiosks, L.I.D. / R.E. Excise Tax / **
etc.) - Callow btwn Burwell/1 lth CDBG / BIA
Before Bus Shelters Kitsap Transit **
2002
2002 Kiosks (bus route info, etc.) Kitsap Transit / L.I.D. / **
BIA / R.E. Excise Tax
2002 Street Trees - Callow btwn Burwell/1 lth CSO project / L.I.D. / **
BIA / R.E. Excise Tax /
CDBG (4)
1998 Low Interest Facade Loan Program CDBG (4) **
1998 Code Compliance Loan Guarantee Program CDBG (4) **
NOTES:
(1) Local park capital funds = Fund 112 Park Facilities Construction (from Golf Course); Fund 109 Real Estate Excise Tax;
and Fund 622 Roosevelt Capital Assets.
(2) BIA = Business and Improvement Association
(3) R.E. Excise Tax = Real Estate Excise Tax
(4) CDBG = Federal Community Development Block Grant - Application to fund program must be approved by City Council.
* Project ~ ~ad~
*~; Cost !o be dete~inedl
P-41
June 18, 1997
Cha, ~ston Community Plan
FACT SHEET
Title: Charleston Community Plan
Description of Proposal
Nature and Location: A community plan for the southwest central area of
the City of Bremerton.
Alternatives: A No Action Alternative which would see a continuance of
land use and development policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan;
the Preferred Action Alternative which modifies land use and zoning and
specifies a range of new improvements and development regulations to
achieve a new community focus; and an Options Alternative which offers
variations on selected elements of the Preferred Alternative.
Proponent: City of Bremerton
Lead Agency: City of Bremerton
Responsible Official: Donald L. Pratt
Contact Person: Kay Wilson (360-478-5275)
Permits and Approvals Required: Bremerton City Council Plan Adoption
DEIS Issuance Date: April 16, 1997
Comments Closed on the DEIS: May 26, 1997
FEIS Issuance Date: June 18, 1997
Public Meetings on the DEIS: Open House / Planning Commission Study
Session -- May 6, 1997; Public Hearing with Planning Commission --
May 20, 1997
Implementation Date: Follows City Council Adoption
Further Review: None currently scheduled; certain elements of the Plan are
considered "Planned Actions" under State law and will receive no further
SEPA review.
Location of Copies for Review: Both Bremerton branches of Kitsap Regional
Library; City of Bremerton Department of Community Development
Cost Per Copy: No charge
Principal Authors and Contributors: City Planning Staff with consultants from
Kato and Warren and Hewitt Isley.
E-1
Charleston Community Plan
I. SUMMARY
A. INTRODUCTION: PURPOSE AND NEED
The City of Bremerton revised its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 to meet the requirements of the
Growth Management Act. This city-wide plan provides broad policy direction to guide City
actions over the coming years. It also identifies the Charleston Business District as a "Specific
Area" for further study.
The City will use the general policy statements in the Charleston Community Plan to guide future
decisions involving development proposals and plan amendments affecting the area. More
specifically, the City will use the Plan to inte~ate neighborhood needs into the City's budget
process, Six-Year Street Improvement Program, Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan and
other planning and funding programs.
The Charleston Community Plan is intended to be used by City officials as input in developing
more specific work programs and in establishing city-wide funding priorities. Many of the
recommendations contained in the Plan are conceptual only and may need further analysis prior
to implementation. Funding may not currently exist for implementing all of the
recommendations identified in the Plan. Also, some of the actions identified in the Plan are
intended to be initiated and implemented by members of the Charleston community.
B. PLANNING PROCESS
The Charleston Community Plan was developed by the City of Bremerton Department of
Community Development with assistance from members of the Charleston community. It is
based on discussions with residents, business people and property owners at a series of
community meetings held between October 1996 and April 1997. The Plan will be adopted by
the Bremerton City Council after Planning Commission review, at least three Planning
Commission/City Council public heatings, and finalization of the Environmental Impact
Statement.
C. INTEGRATED ElS/MASTER PLAN STRATEGY
This document follows the guidance provided by the State's Growth Management Act in
combining both the Community Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement into one
document. The intent is to provide reviewers a more complete understanding of Plan
-implications, potential impacts and mitigation measures. The Plan also takes advantage of a new
provision in the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) to identify "Planned Actions." Planned
Actions benefit from a streamlined development permit process in that they have received
advanced environmental analysis and do not require a SEPA "threshold determination" or the
preparation of an environmental impact statement. Planned Actions identified in the Plan
include:
· All allowed uses in the proposed new Charleston District (CD) zoning district, and
· All allowed residential uses in the Residential Low-density (SF and DR) and Residential
Medium-density (MF) zoning districts.
E-2
Cha. _,ston Community Plan
D. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Preferred Action (Alternative 1)
The proposed Charleston Community Plan contains recommendations in a variety of areas
including land use/zoning, housing, transportation, open space, urban design and public facilities.
A summary of the key recommendations in the preferred plan includes:
Land Use/Zoning
· Adoption of a new "CD" zone tailored specifically for the Charleston Business District
and designed to encourage a better mix of land uses while removing less desirable uses
(e.g., auto-oriented).
· Adjust area zoning to accommodate the Gorst Connector highway improvements
(SR 304); encourage higher density residential development and infill surrounding the
business district; and maintain lower hillside densities.
· Designation of Industrial Park (IP) zones to provide limited areas for non-commercial
activities.
Transportation
· Develop a priority system for neighborhood street improvements ensuring both vehicular
and pedestrian access.
· Improve transit service along Callow and investigate feasibility of a downtown shuttle.
Develop a parking strategy that includes cooperative use of existing off-street parking;
develop new parking opportunities and incentives for visitor and employee parking.
· Develop methods to discourage bypass traffic in residential neighborhoods.
· Develop facilities and incentives to reduce auto dependency in the District.
Pedestrians
· Develop clear pedestrian linkages between parking and businesses, between blocks, and
between PSNS and the business district.
· Develop a system of sidewalks, trails, pathways and stairways to provide safe and
convenient access to and through the business district from all surrounding
neighborhoods.
· Support pedestrian circulation and safety by special design treatment at intersections and
mid-block crossings and through minimizing building setbacks.
Housing
· Encourage the continued revitalization and maintenance of the local housing stock
through incentives and strict code enforcement.
° Develop residential design guidelines to help owners and developers achieve projects of
consistent quality.
Charleston Community Plan
Recreation
· Acquire properties that are uniquely suitable for the development of neighborhood parks,
playgrounds, or other public facilities making up for local deficiencies in those categories.
· Provide, in cooperation with local property owners and merchants, one or more small
"vest pocket" passive parks within the business district.
Public Facilities
· Pursue siting and funding of a central Bremerton Community Center accessible to the
Charleston Community and possibly containing a small law enforcement office.
· Initiate and complete City utility improvements to ensure future developments, as
proposed in this Plan.
Urban Design
· Modify development regulations and standards to promote development that is most
characteristic of the District and its objectives.
· Promote rehabilitation of homes and individual commercial buildings and provide
financial and design assistance within available resources.
2. Alternative 2 (Option to Preferred Action)
Alternative 2 follows the same basic intent of the proposed plan (Alternative 1) but would
include the following options:
Land Use
· The proposed Industrial Park zone bounded by Wycoff, Sixth and Eleventh Streets would
be designated as Charleston District (CD).
· The eastern half of Montgomery bounded by First Street and Burwell would be
designated Charleston District versus Mixed Residential as it is in the proposed plan.
Transportation
· A parking garage to serve PSNS civilian employees and contractors and local business
employees and patrons would be located close to the Farragut gate versus near the
Montegomery gate as it is in the proposed plan.
· An eastbound only--lane would be provided from Wycoff to Callow versus no provision
for this movement in the proposed plan.
3. No Action Alternative
The No Action alternative would see a continuation of development patterns as described in the
1995 Comprehensive Plan and accompanying zoning ordinance and development regulations.
While transportation and circulation improvements would continue to be made in Charleston,
they would not have the focus of emphasizing pedestrian circulation and organizing parking
opportunities. Development of any new open space may not occur in a manner optimizing
District development. Opportunities to relate to the new PSNS Montgomery gate both from a
E-4
Cha .ston Community Plan
vehicular and pedestrian circulation standpoint would not be addressed in a comprehensive
manner. The entire package of incentives and guidance for refurbishing and redevelopment of
existing businesses would not be pursued.
E. IMPACTS AND 1VIITIGATION MEASURES
Land Use/Housing
· The proposed zoning would increase the build out potential for residential units by
approximately 70 units (8% change).
Transportation
· Measures to enhance the pedestrian environment on Callow Avenue may cause a shift of
traffic to Montgomery Avenue.
· The complete closure of Burwell between Callow and Wycoff may result in additional
trips on adjacent streets.
E-5
Charteston Community Plan
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES
A. PROPOSED ACTION OVERVIEW
1. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan
The City of Bremerton revised its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 to meet the requirements of the
Growth Management Act. This city-wide plan provides broad policy direction to guide City
actions over the coming years. It also identifies the Charleston Business District as a "Specific
Area" for further study.
The City will use the general policy statements in the Charleston Community Plan to guide future
decisions involving development proposals and plan amendments affecting the area. More
specifically, the City will use the Plan to integrate neighborhood needs into the City's budget
process, Six-Year Street Improvement Program, Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan and
other planning and funding programs.
2. The Community Planning Process
The Charleston Community Plan was developed by the City of Bremerton Department of
Community Development with assistance from members of the Charleston community. It is
based on discussions with residents, business people and property owners at a series of
community meetings held between October 1996 and April 1997. Those meetings included
discussion of issues identification, EIS scoping, alternatives development and draft plan review.
The Plan will be adopted by the Bremerton City Council after Planning Commission review, at
least three Planning Commission/City Council public hearings, and finalization of the
Environmental Impact Statement.
3. Overview of the Plan
The Charleston Community Plan is organized into four sections:
· The Community Profile contains a general description of the current conditions within the
neighborhood.
· The Vision Statement describes the neighborhood's sense of identity and vision for its
future.
· The Community Plan section identifies issues that are of concern to the members of the
Charleston community and potential action strategies for addressing those concerns.
· The Implementation section recommends various follow-up actions that should be taken by
the City to help implement the plan.
Within the Community Plan are specific proposals for land use/zoning changes including:
creation of a new Charleston District (CD) zone; transportation improvements including traffic
calming features and a new parking strategy; housing proposals that promote a variety of
densities and preservation of existing housing stock; economic proposals that address appropriate
mix of uses and merchant organization; recreation proposals that identify major pedestrian
E-6
Cha. ~ston Community Plan
corridors and pocket park opportunities; and urban design proposals that promote District
identity and visual quality.
B. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. No Action
The No Action alternative would see a continuation of development patterns as described in the
1995 Comprehensive Plan and accompanying zoning ordinance and development regulations.
While transportation and circulation improvements would continue to be made in Charleston,
they would not have the focus of emphasizing pedestrian circulation and organizing parking
opportunities. Development of any new open space may not occur in a manner optimizing
District development. Opportunities to relate to the new PSNS Montgomery gate, both from a
vehicular and pedestrian circulation standpoint, would not be addressed in a comprehensive
manner. The entire package of incentives and guidance for refurbishing and redevelopment of
existing businesses would not be pursued.
Specific aspects of the "No Action" alternative include:
a. Land Use/Zoning
The Charleston District would continue under General Business (GB) zoning. Residential
densities would continue as currently designated.
b. Transportation
The proposed improvement of SR 304 would occur, but with little or no further refinement to
meet the specific needs of the Charleston District. Traffic calming techniques would not be
pursued in a comprehensive manner, if at all. Parking supply and availability would continue at
current levels.
c. Housing
Densities would continue to be based on existing zoning. No focused or comprehensive effort
would be undertaken to stabilize and improve housing stock.
d. Capital Facilities
No new capital facilities are scheduled for the Charleston District in the existing Comprehensive
Plan.
e. Utilities
The major storm water separation project, currently underway, would continue, as would a major
water line upgrade. No other significant projects are scheduled.
E-7
Charteston Community Plan
f. Recreation
No new parks are scheduled for the Charleston District. Open space associated with
redevelopment of SR 304 would be created.
g. Urban Design
No specific or comprehensive urban design plan would be developed to address District identity
or visual quality.
2. Preferred Action (Alternative 1):
See Charleston Community Plan (page P1).
3. Alternative 2 (Options to Preferred Action)
There are several options under consideration for specific plan elements. The key options
amongst these are identified below. They could be substituted individually or in total for the
corresponding provisions in the preferred plan.
a. Land Use
· The proposed Industrial Park zone bounded by Wycoff, Sixth and Eleventh Streets would be
designated as Charleston District (CD).
· The eastern half of Montgomery bounded by First Street and Burwell would be designated
Charleston District versus Mixed Residential as it is in the proposed plan.
b. Transportation
· A parking garage to serve PSNS civilian employees and contractors and local business
employees and patrons would be located close to the Farragut gate versus near th~
Montgomery gate as it is in the proposed plan.
· An eastbound only lane would be provided from Wycoff to Callow versus no provision for
this movement in the proposed plan.
E-8
Cha ston Community Plan
III. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS, MITIGATION
MEASURES AND UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS
A. LAND USE
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Land Use In and Around Study Area
The Charleston Community is characterized by highly developed, lower density residential areas
and a major Naval facility (Puget Sound Naval Shipyard), all surrounding a historical retail
shopping core, the Charleston Business District. The Community also contains a large urban
park, Forest Ridge Park. An elementary school (Naval Avenue Elementary School) is nearby.
The Charleston Business District is centered around Callow Avenue and, to a lesser extent,
Montgomery Avenue, and is concentrated primarily between Eleventh Street on the north and
First Street on the south. The District is irregular in shape and includes some adjacent
commercial, office and light industrial businesses as well.
Street access to the District is excellent. Kitsap Way flows into Eleventh and Sixth Streets while
Charleston Beach Highway (SR 304) provides access from the south to Burwell Street and
Callow Avenue.
This business district is central to at least five residential neighborhoods which, in mm, are
separated from each other by arterial streets. The arterials function as barriers to effectively
prevent ease of movement or interaction between these neighborhoods. Even so, neighborhood
residents do have good access to this business district.
The business district provides a full range of retail shopping and personal services. The 7/11
convenience store at the south end of the District, the Bremerton Food Outlet at Sixth and
Montgomery, and the new Safeway at Eleventh and Callow satisfy most ~ocery needs. Several
restaurants, a bakery, and a tavern or two add variety. Retail stores include a sporting goods
store, bicycle shop, furniture stores, used and antique goods, sports card shop, appliances, and
others. Services include automotive repair, gas, animal care, pawnbrokers, banks, beauty school,
hair care salons and others.
An inventory of developed and available commercial space was conducted by the Bremerton
Planning Division in March of 1997. A summary of the results is shown in Table E1 with a
detailed listing included in Appendix H. At the date of the survey, there were approximately
450,000 square feet in use. Commercially zoned land that is currently vacant totals
approximately 340,000 square feet.
IE~9
Charteston Community Plan
Table E1 m Business District Inventory
Infill GFA GFA Off-Street
Area Summaries Area Used Unused Parking
North of Eleventh Street 86,567 62,100 -- 142
Ninth Street to Eleventh Street 105,554 101.100 -- 246
Sixth Street to Ninth Street 101.738 8 [.500 28,500 303
Burwell Street to Sixth Street 16.000 1,66,250 9,200 410
First Street to Burwell Street 28.800 36.900 1,500 72
Tmals: ] 338,659[ 447,850I 39,200I 1,173
Infill Area: Commercially-zoned land area (sq. ft.) that is currently vacant. This
includes the undeveloped portions of partially-deveiopod lots and
nonconforming development that could be convened to a use a]lowed by
present zoning. (Improved parking areas were considered "developed.")
GFA Used: Estimated "Gross Floor Area" in commercial use. This figure includes
the primary use as well as any secondary or accessory uses that might
occur on the property, other than parking.
GFA Unused: Estimated "Gross Floor Area" that is currently vacant in a commercial
building.
Off-Street Parking: The number of spaces avaitable on each lot.
b. Existing Zoning
Existing zoning is shown on Figure E1 and contains a range of residential densities (from 3 to 44
dwelling units/acre) and a general business zone which allows a broad array of business and
office use.
c. Historical/Cultural Features
The town of Charleston, Washington began with real estate speculation that a new naval
installation would be built somewhere on the shore of Port Orchard and most likely on Sinclair
Inlet. In 1891, the Navy acquired land for a drydock just east of the plat of Charleston. The
contractor for the drydock, Byron Barlow of Tacoma, established his headquarters at Charleston
-- even though the drydock site was over a mile to the east -- because some of his associates
had a financial interest there. The plat of Charleston joined with the plat of Port Orchard .to
incorporate as the Town of Charleston in August 1893. This was a company town; the
newspaper, general store and housing were all controlled by the Barlow Company. Even the first
mayor, Edward Barlow, was the contractor's son, and the second mayor was a company partner.
The company town phase had ended by 1896 when drydock construction was completed and the
workers had departed. Combined with a national depression (Panic of 1893), the town
practically ceased to exist. For two or three years, the town consisted of a general store that also
housed the town hall and post office, a one-room church and a four-room school house of which
only one room was in use. The other buildings that had served the contractor were vacant.
Work began to pick up in the "shipyard" in 1897, as the battleship Oregon was prepared for its
famous voyage around South America to participate in the Spanish American War. Additional
employment for the men and businesses of Charleston came when a coaling facility was built in
the west end.
E-10
Charleston Community Plan
Starting about 1900, the population and area of Charleston began a period of continual growth
that would continue for a quarter of a century. Very quickly, Charleston and Bremerton
expanded to a common boundary at High Avenue. It was at that boundary where the towns
established Union High School, which in 1930 would be renamed Bremerton High School.
Charleston was a one school town until 1912, when schools (grades 1 to 3) were added in Navy
Yard City, on Naval Avenue and near Phinney Bay. With the great growth resulting from World
War I, Hillcrest was added next to the old Charleston Central School and the federal government
built Washington School for Charleston and Lincoln for Bremerton.
The other building that the government provided to Charleston as a result of World War I is now
known as the American Legion Hall. It originally was known as the Charleston community
House or Red Circle Club when it opened in 1919. It had been built by War Camp Community
Service for the thousands of servicemen in the shipyard at that time. When the vi, ar ended, title
passed to the town and later to the American Legion.
Through 1912, almost all commercial development in Charleston had been on Farragut or south
along Cambrian, Wycoff or Callow, and all were wooden. Beginning in 1907, brick and concrete
buildings were built and some commercial buildings began on Naval Avenue and around the
intersection of Burwell and Callow.
The strengths of Charleston had always been a good beachfront, proximity to the shipyard, and
good transportation, first by ferries and later by roads. Each was eventually lost. Successive
improvements to the road to the head of the bay (Gorst) took away the beach. Larger automobile
ferries discontinued service to Charleston after Bremerton provided auto handling facilities.
Finally, in 1942, shipyard expansion resulted in the destruction of most of the early business
buildings and loss of the last of the waterfront with its railroad facilities. Charleston lasted 33
years as a separate city and has been the heart of west Bremerton for the last 70 years.
d. Key Development Regulations
Those development regulations subject to change deal with commercial activities in the General
Business (GB) zone and include parking, setbacks and height limits. Existing provisions for
these elements include:
Parking -- Allowed as a primary use in the General Business (GB) zone.
Setbacks Maximum Minimum
· Front -- 20 feet
· Side -- 0 feet from non-residential zones,
10 feet from residential zones
· Rear -- 0 feet
Height Limit 60 feet
E-12
Cha ston Community Plan
Sample Valuations -- Commercial Uses
review of County Assessor records (1996) was conducted for the commercial properties
fronting on both sides of Callow Avenue from Burwell Street to Eleventh Street. The results of
that review are shown in Table E2.
Table E2 -- Assessed Values
ASSESSED VALUE
LOT Acres Land Use Owners
Buildings t Land I TOTAL
44 0.26 Office Furn. Fields 186,000 72,000 258,000
57 2.94 Safeway Riggs 2,922,000 640,000 3,562,000
74 0.20 Pawn Shop Fischler 57,000 86,000 143,000
75 0.21 E1Camino Maurice 264,000 60.000 324,000
76 0.21 Card Room Maurice 96,000 60,000 156,000
77 0.09 Retail i D%earimore 80,000 26,000 106,000
78 0.05 Bus. Svcs. Churchill 38,000 14,000 I 52,000
79 0.14 Retail De,earimom 82,000 40,000 122,0001
80 0.14 Retail Beth Hatikvah 88,000 40,000 128,000
81 0.36 Vacant Bldg Peterson 211,000 ilM,000 315,000
82 0.64 Vacant Bld~ Peterson 208,000 154,000 362,000
83 0.10 Retail Cntr. of Ways 90.000 29,000 119,000
84 0.07 Bakery Sheldon 56,000 20.000 76,000
85 0.10 Retail Bryan Prop. 89,000 2%000 118.000
86 0.14 Veterinarian Bischak 75,000 40.000 115;000
87 0.32 Retail Scott 327,000 138,000 465,000
102 0.17 Retail Brinkerhoff 98,000 73,000 171,000
103 0.07 Retail Jackley 18,000 25,000 43,000
104 0.07 Retail Dave's Guns 62,000 25.000 87,000
105 0.10 Retail Maurer 42,000 36.000 78.000
106 0.10 Theater Forbes 70,000 36,000 106,000
107 0.11 Bus. Svcs. Johnson 47,000 40.000 87,000
108 0.14 Pers. Sves. Childress 65,000 50.000 115,000
113 0.24 Home Fum. Meurs 374,000 97.000 471,000
122 0.06 Retail Ode~aard 44,000 24,000 ! 68,000
123 0.10 *,etail Westroad Inv. 65,000 29,000 94,000
124 0.17 Retail Ode?ard 89,000 61.00t3 150.000
125 0.10 Home Fum. Hills/Keppert 123,000 36,000 159,000
126 0.14 Retail Bejeault 53,000 50.000 103,000
127 0.02 Retail Hoffman 7,000, 7,000 14,000
128 0.07 Retail Moeller 33,000 25.000 58,000
129 0.18 Retail Pro Rentals 23,000 65.000 88,000
130 0.14 Retail Wan~/Wa~ner 77,000 50,000 127,000
131 0.07 Retail Dascenzo 57,000 25.000 82,000
132 0.07 Retail Hovermale 47,000 25.000 72,000,
133 0.07 Retail Ber~Haynes 57,000 25.000 82,000
134 0.19 Retail Ber~nJHaynes 145,000 82.000 227,000
Total 1' ] 8.35 t All Businesses I 6,494,000(72%) 2,488,000 (28%) 8,982,000
Total 2' 5.41 Without Safeway ] [t 3,572,000 1,848,000
I
5,420,000
(66%) (34%') ~
Total I -- Totals of all businesses and their properties.
Total 2 -- Excludes Safeway
Safeway is the newest and, by far, the largest and highest value building in the area. By not including the Safeway
property, the "Total 2" Figures are more representative of this business district.
E-13
Charteston Community Plan
2. Significant Impacts
a. No Action
The District will continue to have the prospect of new or expanded auto-oriented use. These
are in conflict with the community goal of a pedestrian-friendly environment.
There will be no positive resolution of land use designations for the new SR 304 corridor.
Numerous parcels will continue with zoning unmatched to access needs, noise intrusion or
compatibility with adjacent uses.
· There would be no reco=o-nition of the new PSNS gate at Montgomery.
· The amount of new development potential may be less due to tack of a comprehensive set of
initiatives aimed at enhancing the District.
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative)
· The proposed zoning reduces the range of allowable business uses and most specifically
eliminates most auto-oriented uses. All such uses which are currently developed would
become non-conforming and would not be able to expand or rebuild if destroyed.
· New potential commercial development over the 20 year period of the Plan is estimated at
400,000 square feet.
· The proposed zoning provides for an increase in residential density. See Section EI B,
Housing, for a discussion of potential impacts.
c. Alternative 2
· Proposed Industrial Park zoning (IP) is eliminated in this alternative for those blocks bounded
by Eleventh Avenue, Sixth Avenue/Kitsap Way and the east face of Wycoff, and is
designated as Charleston District (CD). Elimination of the IP designation removes a range of
uses that are essential to overall community development and would potentially make existing
uses in this area non-conforming.
· The east face of Montgomery in the block bounded by Burwell and First Avenue is
redesignated from Mixed Residential (MR) to Charleston District (CD).
· These redesignations increase the total area of CD zoning and have the prospect, at least in
the short term, of diluting the vitality of the core CD area. This would happen if development
were to occur in these areas prior to in-filling the core CD area.
3. Mitigation Measures
No mitigation is identified for potential impacts associated with Alternative 1. Mitigation for
"over zoning" CD uses in Alternative 2 could involve a deferral in CD type uses in the
redesignated areas until such time as a certain level of new development (e.g., 50,000 sq. ft.) had
occurred in the core area.
4. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
No unavoidable impacts have been identified for any of the alternatives under consideration.
E-14
Cha ston Community Plan
B. HOUSING
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Housing Stock in Study Area
The source of information for the overall Charleston Planning Area is from the 1990 census. The
major change since the census would be the expansion of PSNS to Callow Avenue, which
removed 168 housing units from the City's housing stock.
The Charleston Planning Area is located in the census tract block groups listed below and shown
on Figure E2. The percent of each block group that lies within the Planning Area is estimated.
Approx. % of Block Group
Location Block Group in Planning Area
Between 11-~- 13-~ Streets: 806- 300 (10%)
Between 6-~ - 11th Streets: 811 - 100 (35%)
Between 1s- 6-~ Streets: 811 - 200 (80%)
Between Preble - 1~t Streets: 811 - 300 (50%)
Between City Limits - Preble: 810 - 100 (5%)
The heart of the District lies within the Block Groups 811-200 and 811-300. However, the 168
units removed by the PSNS expansion were located in Block Group 811-300, one of the "core"
block ~oups, so data for that block ~oup may not represent present conditions closely.
Following is a summary of data from Tables E3 and E4 below. (This data does not take into
account the 168 units removed by the PSNS expansion.)
Total housing units in Charleston Block Groups in 1990: 2,634
Total units in core block groups (811-200 and 811-300): 1,075
Total occupied housing units: 2,417
Total occupied units in core block groups: 959
Percent owner-occupied in Charleston Block Groups: 47.0%
Percent owner-occupied in core block groups 35.0%
The following table (Table E3) lists occupancy and tenure data for the Charleston Area block
groups from the 1990 census.
E-15
Cha~._o'ton Com~nunity Plan
Table E3 -- 1990 Occupancy and Tenure in Charleston Block Groups
Item Census Tract Block Group
: 806-300 [ 81:t~100 811-200 811~300 I 810z100 Total
Totalhousing units 429 526 409 666: :: 604 2,634
Occupied housing units 394 505 361:: ~: 559 2,417
Owner-occupied 215 298 :108 228; 287 1,136
Percent owner occupied 54.6 59.0 29:9 38.1 51.3 47.0
Renter occupied 179 207 253 370 272 1,281
Vacant housing units 35 21 48 68 45 217
For occasional use i 0 0 :0: 1 2
Homeowner vacancy rate (%) 0.9 1.7 1.8 320 ;: 1.7 n.a.
Rental vacancy rate (%) 3.2 3.3 14i2 ? i 8~6 ; 4.9 n.a.
Persons/owner-occupied unit 2.15 2.35 : 2~61 : 2~36 i': 2.25 12
Persons/ranter-occupied unit 2.36 2.53 1284 12.27 2.28 11
Units w/over I person/room 15 17 }17 I 31 29 109
Occupancy in Core Area
Table E4 lists occupancy and tenure date for the "core" block groups (811-200 and 811-300).
This data does not take into account the 168 units removed by the PSNS expansion. This area
was known to have a high proportion of lower value housing, much of which was rental units.
Table E4 -- 1990 Occupancy and Tenure in Charleston "Core" Block Groups
Item Census Tract Block Group :
811;-200 , 811-300: :. :~Total:'::
Total housing units 409 666 1,075
Occupied housin~ units 361 598 959
Owner-occupied 108 228 336
Percent owner occupied 29.9 38.1 35.0
Renter occupied 253 370 623
Vacant housing units 48 68 l 16
For occasional use 0 0 0
Homeowner vacancy rate (%) 1.8 3.0 n.a.
Rental vacancy rate (%) 14.2 8.6 n.a.
Persons/owner-occupied unit 2.61 2.36 5
Persons/renter-occupied unit 1.84 2.27 4
Units w/over 1 person/room 17 31 48
That portion of the study area (see Figure E3) affected by proposed land use and zoning changes
contains 674 dwelling units within the currently designated residential zones. Their distribution
is shown in Table E5. Housing types range from single family to medium density residential (up
to 18 units per acre). Up to 89 of these dwelling units will be lost to the construction of SR 304.
Accounting for loss of housing to SR 304, the potential number of dwelling units that could exist
under current zoning is 824 units.
E-17
Chi,. ~ston Community Plan
Table E5 -- Existing and Potential New Housing Units in Charleston Planning Area
(Excluding CD/IP Business Core Area)
(A) (B) (C)
Existing Units in Units in Adjusted Total Potential Total
Block # * Units SR 304 Area GB Zone (A-B-C) New Units Possible Units
25 24 24 2 26
26 33 33 0 33
27 5 5 7 i2
28 4 4 6 10
29 9 9 4 13
30 7 7 5 12
31 14 ' 14 2 ~ 16
21 4; ' 25
32! 21:
33 0 :: : : 60 :;60'
63 63 25: :::: 88 ::
341
35 22: : 22 11 :: J : :33:: ;
36 l0 10 12 22
37 9 9 3 12
38 16 16 9 25
39* 31 -7 24 3 27
40* 39 -39 0 0 0
19.2
42: : 19 :' 19 5::;
43~: ;::: :18 :: 12
45 ;: I: :; 2 : :::' 2: 4: : ~ : 6:
46 6 6 0 6
47 9 9 1 10
48* 33 -6 27 0 27
49* 8 -8 0 0 0
50 0 0 0 0
12
:53* :
15: 0( :::
56* 16 -i -15 0 0 0
57 I1 11 5 16
58 26 26 21 47
59* 12 -8 -4 0 0 0
60 23 23 39 62
61: t32 : : 1321 : :: [ 132
Total 693 -89 -19 585 239[ 824
See Figure E4 for block number locations.
Part or all of block is in SR 304 revised alignment.
Housing Valuation and Affordabilit¥
Current residential assessed valuation (1996 data) was determined for sample areas within the
Charleston District (see Figure E5). Within the sample areas, the valuation for residential units
(unit plus land) ranged from an average of approximately $28,000 to $91,637. The summaps~ of
assessed valuations is shown in Table E6.
E-19
Rainier to Ol~pic ~'""'~ ~::::: ':.:
Montgeme~ Ave
Charleston Community Plan figure E5
Residential Assessed Value Survey- Sample Areas ~
no scale
Charleston Community Plan
Affordability levelsI for Bremerton as of 1993 were estimated to be $91,212. As can be seen
from Table E6, the Charleston area provides a significant source of affordable housing with 96%
of all units within the sample area qualifying as "affordable."
Table E6 -- Summary Valuations
Neighborhood Units Individual Homes All Residential Units
(% of all) Avg. Assessed Value Number Avg. Assessed Value
Area A 38 (73%) $ 62,701 52 $ 56,073
Area B 27 (77%) $ 90,693 35 $ 82,132
Area C 27 (47%) $ 68,551 57 $ 58,735
Area D 32 (47%) $ 60,514 68 $ 44,345
Area E 40 (63%) $ 61,423 63 $ 50,664
Area F 22 (15%) $ 61,777 150 $ 27,942
Area G 18 (60%) $ 77,578 30 $ 57,475
AreaH 19 (100%) $ 91,637 19 $ 91,637
Area I 20 (83%) $ 73,567 24 $.65,882
Area J 24 (86%) $ 57,484 28 $ 53,536
TOTALS 267 (51%) $ 69,001 526 $ 49,586
$18,423,151 Value $26,082,432 Total Value
71% of Tot. Res. Value
2. Significant lmpacts
a. No Action
The adopted Comprehensive Plan contains no specific proposals for the Charleston District
which would directly impact the existing housing stock or affordability levels.
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Action)
The proposed zoning for the Charleston District would increase the potential housing stock by
approximately 8%. As shown in Table E7, there are approximately 605 existing units in areas
designated for residential development. The proposed zoning would allow an additional 288
units at build out (see Table E8). This is approximately 70 more units than permitted under
existing zoning. Both the existing General Business (GB) zone and proposed replacement
Charleston District (CD) zone allow housing. No increase in potential number of units would
occur with the CD zoning.
No impacts have been identified with this potential increase as all of the proposed residential
density changes occur within areas currently served by utilities and with developed access. No
capacity limitations have been identified for basic utility services (water, sewer, power -- see
Section m D, Capital Facilities/Utilities) and no LOS limits would be exceeded on area streets
(see Section 11I C, Transportation). The proposed density increases do not have any identifiable
impact on the affordable housing supply in the Charleston District.
~ Affordable housing is that which can be purchased by a family of 4 earning 80% of the County median and not
spending more than one third of their income on housing.
E-22
Cha ~ston Community Plan
Table E7 -- Existing Residential Units in Proposed Residential Zones
Block SF-3 DR MF NLR MX (SR-3) Total
25 24 24
26 15 15
27 5 5
28 4 4
29 9 9
30 7 7
31 14 14
32 21 21
33 0 0
34 6 57 63
35 13 9 22
36 10 10
37 9 9
38 4 12 16
*39 14 10 (7) 24
*40 12 (39) 12
41 12 12
42 18 18
*43 12 (18) 12
44 0 0
45 2 2
46 7 7
47 9 9
*48 27 (6) 27
*49 (8) 0
*50 0 0
51 2 2
52 7 5 12
*53 11 1 (2) 12
54 9 6 15
55 7 7
*56 15 (1) 15
57 11 11
58 2 24 26
*59 8 (4) 8
60 23 23
61 132 132
Total 40 206 66 217 76 (85) 605
E-23
Charteston Community Plan
Table E8 -- Potential New Residential Units in Proposed Residential Zones
B10c& : ~SF~3~ DR IvlF :i~ MX: I Total
S~FJD:U;i : 4,800: 4,800 2.053 ~: 1,000 : 1,000
25 2 2
26 0 0
27 7 7
28 6 6
29 4 4
30 5 . 5
31 2 2
32 4 4
33 60 60
34 25 25
36 ~2 12
37 3 3
38 6 3 9
39* 3 3
41 ~ 4
42 4 4
43* 0 0
44 0
46 0 0
47 l I
48* 0 0
49* 0
52 I I 2
53 2 2 4
54 0 0 0
55 I : 55 55
56* 2 2
57 5 5
58 13 13
61 0 0
TOtal:: 16: 142 6 [ ::106: 18 288
Alternative 2
Alternative 2 would reduce housing potential by approximately 20 units through the rezoning of
eastern half of Montgomery on the block bounded by First Avenue and Burwell Street from
(Medium Residential) to CD (Charleston District). No impacts are identified with this
potential reduction.
Mitigation Measures
mitigation measures have been identified for any of the alternatives under consideration.
Unavoidable Impact
unavoidable impacts have been identified for any of the alternatives under consideration.
E-24
Ch~, ,ston Co~nmunity Plan
C. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Circulation In and Around Study Area
Figure E6 shows the location of the Charleston District relative to the primary arterial system
serving west Bremerton. SR 304 is the primary route from east Bremerton, the Bremerton CBD,
and the Naval Shipyard to south Kitsap County. It makes a turn in the Charleston District, using
Callow Avenue south of Burwell Street as a principal arterial. Sixth and Eleventh Streets feed
into Kitsap Way and the SR 3 freeway as the primary route from central Bremerton and the
Naval Shipyard to central and north Kitsap. Naval Avenue provides a connection between the
Naval Shipyard and Sixth and Eleventh Streets. From the Farragut gate, shipyard traffic to/from
central and north Kitsap uses Arsenal Way and Loxie Eagans Boulevard as an alternate route to
SR3.
Before the SR 3 freeway was constructed, Callow Avenue was the official SR 3 route through
Bremerton between south and central Kitsap (Kitsap Way). This historic through traffic route
was likely a catalyst to the development of the Charleston Business District. Since construction
of the freeway bypass, Callow Avenue north of Burwell has become non-essential for through
traffic use.
b. Existing LOS and Capacity
The street and arterial system serving the Charleston District and 1992 volumes are shown on
Figure E7. Burwell, Sixth and Eleventh Streets are the primary through traffic routes; as
discussed above. Callow Avenue between Sixth and Burwell Streets carries less than half the
traffic of these major arterial routes. No counts were available for Montgomery Avenue;
however, it appears to be more lightly traveled than Callow between Sixth and Burwell. All
major street intersections are signalized and they operate at level of service (LOS) C or better.
c. Parking SupplvFUtilization
A parking survey was conducted in March, 1997 by the Planning Division to determine the
number and distribution of parking spaces in the retail core area. The results of this survey are
shown in Figures E8 and E9 and in Table E9. On-street parking along Callow provides a
convenient and much desired parking supply for area businesses. While the overall number of
spaces (1,361) in the business area appears adequate, many of these spaces are associated with
specific businesses and do not function as part of a general supply. Other than marked on-street
spaces, a visitor to the area would have difficulty locating general use parking. There is currently
no policy in place to manage employee parking, which may preclude use of close-in, convenient
spaces by customers, and there is concern that parking associated with PSNS could be occurring
on City streets and in private lots. While PSNS has recently improved parking supply for
military personnel vehicles on base, there is no provision for parking for the civilian workforce
or contractors. This unmet demand places pressure on the surrounding neighborhoods and the
Charleston Business District.
E-25
Charteston Community Plan
Table E9 -- Charleston District Parking Supply
Block # Off-Street On-Street Marked On-Street Total
Unmarked
~- 50 0 14 64
82 0 31 113
:3 ..:::. 11 0 16 27
8 28 0 4 32
179 0 0 179
-f3 ;i;:; 37 17 4 41
53 15 0 53
;'.: 15:::. 55 0 2 57
-:~:-[6.: 9 0 14 23
:.~. -: t7!: .-: 18 0 3 2 l
:': 1811: ¢~i 57 15 4 61
· .'.:; 19' ¢ 5: 29 21 0 29
! :i.:.2(11.. : 79 0 17 96
245 20 0 245
- 11 0 7 18
37 0 0 37
i~;24 ~.i~ 24 0 15 39
TOTAL.'i ~: :~ i::.i" :i ~:'~::'~ i;! ~ ~004 ': 'i':' '.'i ); 'i: : 13I;- : !".:. 1i361
d. Service
Kitsap Transit currently operates east/west bus routes through the Charleston community on
Sixth and Eleventh Streets and along the BurwellYCallow SR 304 route. These routes are shown
on Figure El0. Service frequency from the District back to downtown and the ferry terminal is
no less than every 15 minutes.
e. Scheduled Improvements
The City of Bremerton and WSDOT have prepared plans to improve SR 304 between the ferry
terminal and its junction with SR 3. The adopted plan envisions a widening of Burwell to three
moving traffic lanes between Naval Avenue and Warren Avenue by removing parking on one
side. The intersection of Burwell and Callow will be realigned and reconstructed to facilitate
through traffic movement between these two intersection legs (see Figure E11) and to discourage
through traffic use of Callow north of Burwell. South of Burwell, Callow will be widened and
realigned to eliminate the "dog-leg" at Farragut Street. A new street connection will be
constructed from the Farragut gate to Arsenal Way to facilitate shipyard traffic movement
to/from SR 3 north via its Loxie Eagans Boulevard interchange.
Figure El2 illustrates the modified street system and shows 2020 long-range traffic forecasts.
These forecasts include the anticipated traffic generation from Sinclair Landing. However, the
SR 304 studies did not acknowledge Naval Shipyard plans for a new access from Montgomery
Avenue. It is also believed that the 2020 traffic forecasts may not include the full impact of the
added carrier homeport. With these caveats, traffic volumes are estimated to increase by 50%
along Sixth Street over the next 25 years and by 65% to 75% along the SR 304 route. Long-
range operating conditions in the vicinity of the Charleston Business District are expected to
remain at LOS C or better during the p.m. peak commuter traffic hour.
The traffic forecast of 11,200 trips per 24 hours for Callow between Sixth and Burwell could be
considered heavy for a two-lane street operation with parking on both sides. It would require
E-30
Charleston Community Plan figure Ell
New SR-304 Configuration
Charleston Community Plan
continued use of left turn lanes at Sixth Street and at Burwell Street. However, the traffic
forecasting models did not reflect the potential for some traffic shifts from this section of Callow
to Montgomery Avenue, which is situated parallel to Callow. This will occur as a result of the
street realignment project shown on Figure E11 and other measures to discourage unnecessary
traffic use of Callow north of Burwell. The new Naval Montgomery gate would also help direct
shipyard traffic to/from Sixth Street via Montgomery Street. The City is currently testing a
closure of the steep section of Burwell west of Callow Avenue to Wycoff. Final determination
has not been made as to whether there will be any or partial closure of this segment.
f. Pedestrian Circulation
The Charleston District has an incomplete system of sidewalks abutting the circulation system.
While sidewalks of varying dimension and quality do exist on Callow, they are incomplete on
Wycoff and Montgomery. Signalized intersections do provide for pedestrian crossings but no
special treatment is given to alert motorists to the potential presence of pedestrians. There is
currently no pedestrian-oriented directional signage or mapping to point out location of key
features in the community (e.g., Forest Ridge Park, PSNS, downtown).
2. Significant Impacts
a. No Action
Pedestrian Features
There would be no organized or specific attempt to promote pedestrian circulation within the
core district, and therefore community goals would not be met. Without positive treatment of
potential movement from PSNS to the Callow retail core, a significant safety problem in the
crossing of Burwell could develop. This could discourage flow of pedestrians from PSNS to the
Callow area.
Parking
There would be no organized effort to promote parking management. Close-in spaces would
continue to be dominated by employee parking or be otherwise unavailable to the general public.
By not developing a parking garage, PSNS civilian employees and contractors will continue to
put pressure on available spaces in surrounding neighborhoods and the Callow shopping district.
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Action)
Proposed Zoning Changes
The proposed zoning plan would result in a potential for more building area (especially
residential) than allowable under current zoning. On the other hand, it would encourage more
mixed uses and pedestrian orientation, which reduce auto travel. The proposed zoning would
also result in less auto-intensive types of businesses. The overall assessment is that the proposed
zoning would not result in any significant increase in vehicle trip generation over that which
could occur in the 20 year Plan horizon or at buildout under existing zoning.
E-34
Charleston Community Plan
Localizing Callow Avenue
The plans to "pedestrianize" Callow Avenue north of Burwell could reduce the through traffic
moving efficiency of Callow. However, that is an objective of the Plan. As was pointed out
above, Callow north of Burwell is not essential for through traffic movement in Bremerton. The
Callow/Burwell street modifications illustrated in Figure E11 would promote some traffic shifts
to Montgomery Avenue, which is situated parallel and has considerable unused capacity. The
new Montgomery gate for the Naval Shipyard would further increase use of Montgomery rather
than Callow for shipyard access. Localizing Callow north of Burwell would not result in any
significant impacts on overall traffic circulation in the greater vicinity.
Additional actions to install sidewalk "bulbs" at the Callow intersections with Sixth and Eleventh
Streets should be approached with care. Turning radii for trucks and buses are important
considerations; the actions should not result in unsafe intrusions of adjacent lanes by trucks and
buses in making turning maneuvers.
Burwell Pedestrian Crossing
The Burwell/Callow intersection modifications will result in more pedestrian-friendly crossings
of the north and west legs. However, pedestrian crossings of the south and east approaches
should be avoided if possible. With the new Montgomery gate serving military PX and
entertainment facilities, protected pedestrian crossings of Burwell at Montgomery should be
promoted. However, pedestrian crossing times would affect signal phasing and could reduce the
capacity of the intersection.
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Actions
The proposed plan calls for traffic calming actions where deemed appropriate by City
Engineering. Such actions could include local street cul-de-sacs, intersection traffic islands and
diverters, speed bumps, and stop signs. However, care should be exercised to identify the
problems that are supposed to be remedied by these actions before the actions are initiated, since
such actions can impair the local circulation that the streets should be providing. The use of
temporary actions plus observations of results should be considered before permanent actions are
implemented.
Parking
The proposal to consolidate off-street parking and designate a portion for short-term customer
parking should have a positive impact on circulation and on the economic vitality of the District.
Currently, there is no indication of alternate available parking if on-street parking is occupied,
which causes shoppers to either circulate around the block until a space frees up, park illegally,
or leave the District and shop elsewhere where parking is known to be available.
The companion proposal to place a parking structure in the block bounded by First Avenue,
Burwell, Montgomery and Callow will also have a positive benefit on circulation. By providing
space for employee parking, overflow shopper parking and PSNS civilian employee/contractor
parking, pressure should be taken off the available supply of on- and off-street parking serving
the core. Also, by having a known location of adequate capacity and easy access, circulation
within the District associated with a search for available parking would be reduced.
E-35
Charleston Community Plan
The new CD zone does not require provision of parking on-site if spaces are dedicated at other
existing parking facilities. This provision will need to be monitored to assure that the parking
supply is not diminished through conversion of the parking facilities to other uses.
c. Alternative 2
Parking
The proposal to place a parking structure near the Farragut gate should have a positive impact on
circulation within the District, but to a lesser extent than the proposal in Alternative 1 (up at First
and Montgomery). This location could be very successful in attracting PSNS civilian/contractor
parking but ineffective in serving as a location for business district employee parking or overflow
for shoppers in the District.
Burwell Closure West of Callow
The proposal to close the westbound lane of Burwell between Wycoff and Callow should have a
positive impact on vehicular circulation with only minor compromise of pedestrian circulation,
The partial opening allows egress from the hillside into the Callow area and SR 304 corridor
without requiring traffic to go north to Sixth Avenue or south to First Avenue. While still
allowing for an expanded pedestrian facility over existing conditions, the concept of a more
generous "hill climb" at this point is compromised,
3. Mitigation Measures
a. No Action Alternative
No mitigation is identified for the No Action Alternative,
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative)
Parking
The location of a parking structure at First Avenue and Montgomery could be enhanced for use
by PSNS civilian workers and contractors by providing shuttle bus service from the new
Montgomery gate.
Closure of Burwell Block
A right turn only from southbound Callow to westbound First Street could be provided to allow
circulation back to the Charleston District.
c. Alternative 2
Parking
No mitigation has been identified for the reduced potential of a garage at this site in terms of
service to business district employees or shoppers.
E-36
Chat ~eston Community Plan
4. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
· The circulation impact of the Burwell closure is unavoidable.
· The reduced service level of a parking garage at Farragut is unavoidable.
D. CAPITAL FACILITIES/UTILITIES
There are no new proposed capital facilities or utility upgrades or expansions proposed for the
Charleston Community which are not already part of the City's current capital program. There
are no significant deficiencies in service capabilities of existing utilities that would affect
development as proposed in the Charleston Community Plan.
The ongoing sewer separation pro,am which affects much of the Charleston Business District
could serve as a catalyst to accomplishing many of the street design objectives of the Charleston
Community Plan.
E. RECREATION
1. Affected Environment
a. Existing Facilities in Study Area
The Charleston Neighborhood is served by two City parks, Forest Ridge Park on its west
boundary and Kiwanis Park near its east boundary. A future park at the old Haddon School site
is planned for development and will be located near the planning area's north boundary. The
Gateway project, featuring extensive landscaped right-of-way associated with redevelopment of
SR 304, will be developed and will impact the southern area to Burwell. While the Gateway may
not be used for recreation purposes, it can be viewed as open space.
Forest Ridge Park is located on the west side of the planning area. It generally serves the
neighborhood from Wycoff to Marion Avenue and from Sixth Avenue to Coontz Street. The
park is 27.3 acres, most of it covered in woods. In the last two years, Forest Ridge Park has
undergone a renovation; the Department installed a new playground toy, resurfaced the tennis
court and renovated the restroom. With the assistance of the Boy Scouts, the lawn area was
developed and new horseshoe pits, picnic tables and park benches were installed. Security
lighting and parking were also upgraded. The Department planted a number of trees and has
made a concerted effort to make sure that the forest is in good health.
Kiwanis Park is located between Fourth and Fifth Avenues, east of Hewitt Street. This is within
three blocks of the eastern boundary of the planning area. This park is three acres. It has a
soccer field, youth baseball field, two tennis courts, a walking path, playground toy, and
restroom.
The City is in negotiation with the Bremerton School District to purchase the former Haddon
School site. This should be accomplished in 1997, at which time development can begin. It is
anticipated that the site will offer open play fields, playground equipment, walking paths, picnic
E-37
Charleston Community Plan
areas, restrooms and parking. This future park should be able to serve the northern portion of the
Charleston neighborhood as well as most of the Anderson Cove neighborhood.
The Parks and Recreation 1995 Comprehensive Plan establishes LOS (levels of service) for park
land and facilities. The Plan reflects that in 1995 the Department had 317 acres of park land, or
about 8 acres per 1,000 population, taking under consideration a combination of resource
activities, athletic field/playgrounds and recreation center and pools. According to the 1995
Comprehensive Plan, the PLOS (proposed level of service) should be about 10 acres per 1,000
population. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that according to nationzil standards, the
Department does supply sufficient athletic fields and playgrounds to serve the general
population. However, the Plan also indicates that the distribution of fields and playgrounds is
uneven within the Bremerton city limits and, as a consequence, some neighborhoods may be
underserved.
The Charleston neighborhood displays a somewhat uneven distribution of parks, with the edges
being better served than the central core along Callow. It is also deficient in acres per population
with 27.3 acres in the actual planning area compared to an estimated population of 6480. This
results in a ratio of 4 acres per 1,000 population versus the LOS goal of 10 acres per 1,000
population.
2. Significant Impacts.
a. No Action
With no specific proposal for increasing recreation opportunities,.existing needs would go unmet
and opportunities may be lost to competing development.
b. Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative)
With the introduction of one or two pocket parks in the retail core area, a ~ositive impact on
recreation in the core area will be realized. The overall Charleston Community will remain,
however, below desired service standards. The proposed "hill climb" corridor on Burwell and
pedestrian corridor on Sixth Avenue (extended) will serve to promote linkages with the retail
core and the recreation opportunities of Forest Ridge Park.
c. Alternative 2
No variation in recreation proposals are contained in Alternative 2.
3. Mitigation Measures
For both action alternatives, additional funds and commitment could be made to the Charleston
District to increase overall open space. The total deficiency of 4-5 acres could be accomplished
on one site or perhaps 2 or 3 smaller sites and provide a meaningful addition to recreation
resources.
4. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
No unavoidable impacts have been identified for any of the alternatives under consideration.
E-38
May 25, 1997
1997
I~R£MF..RTON
To Whom I! May Concern:
Ptease find attached 2 copies of'written comments pertaining to the
proposed Charleston Business Diarict Plan. The last date for written comment
w~s noted to be May 26th. Since the 2fith of May is a national holiday, there
wasn't an opportunity to present them to you on this date; thus, I am hand
delivering them on May 27th.
The comments are critical of'the plans closure of First Street on the west side
side of Callow; not only negatively impacting the businesses on the west side of
the ,,'-eet, but also closing off.access ofthe residents living to the west o~'
First and Callow. Nowhere else along the Callow in the proposed business
district was access so flagrantly denied! In addition, the plan is partial to the
business area between Burwell and 1 lth; the remainder of the business district
on Callow is given very minimal attention and for the most part neglected or
treated as second class citizens.
I am hopeful that the plan will 13e changed and equity/fairness to be shoxm
for all businesses in the Charleston district on Callow avenue.
Respectfully submitled are the comments of 1) Dr. Marvin Bruno of 103 N.
Callow and 2) John Furtado of Ltl John Automotive. Either or both of us can be
contacted at your convience for further clarification or information.
Marvin Bruno, Ph.D.
Clinical Psychologist
cc: Mayor Lynn Horton
1~40
Concerns with the Charleston comprehensive plan are as
the present access on the west side of ]First and Callow has
been closed by the plan and replaced by a permanent barrier
thus, there will be no way to make a turn to the west While driving on
Callow and thus read access the business located at the south end is negatively impacted or
greatly reduced
you will still be able to make tums to the east on First and Callow, toward
lhe Naw yard and 7-11; businesses on the east and west side of the street are being treated
differently and equity or equality is absant', there is accommodation for the big owners and big
interests only
small businesses on the west side of First and Callo~v are not provided for
fairly and equally with business interests on the East side of Callow-access to their
businesses toward the southwest end of the business district are limited if
not made extremely difficult--vn]y the most persistent client o~ customer will attempt to access
these business; access from Burwell is inadequatel it is a steep and a :. roller
coaster hill that is far from being user friendly
THE ONLY ACCESS WlTIIIN THE BUSINESS DISTRICT ON
CALLOW CLOSED BY IItE CHARLESTON PLAN IS AT FIRST AND CALLOW ON
TIlE WEST SIDE OF TIlE STREET--THE RESIDENCES AND BUSINESSES NOW
USrNG THE STREET ARE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED FAIRNESS??
many (hundreds/thousands) residents of the area are cut off from their
primary access to the bus,ness district by rmt being allowed to cross Callow at First street
Observations of current crossings at First street indicate that Ihis is
a preferred route to access the Charleston business area by
residents from the west side of Callow who have been the primary
customers of many of the businesses in the Charleston area; using
Bum'ell or Sixth or Faragut are not reasonable alternatives
Although the beginning of the Charleston business district starts
E-41
2
at First street, the "entry" lo the district is said to be But-well;
businesses from ButwelI to First Street particularly those toward
First StTeet and on the west side of the street are being treated wi~.h
benign neglect or negatively impacted; blighted areas of business
districls are created by such treatment by government agencies.
Why shouldn't ail oft.he business area have an equal opportunity
to prosper and benefit from the planning and resources being made
available to the business district?
Resources provided by the plan ar, far from fairly
distributed by the plan and give favor to the area on Callow
between Burwel[ and 1 lth
E-42
May 19, 1997
Donald L. Pmu
Director
City of Bremerton
Dcpa~'~i~cn~ of Community Development
2$6Fourth Street
Brernerton, WA 98337
RE: Charleston Community Plan
April 16, 1997 Draft
Dear Mr. Pratt:
As owner of the Bremcrton School D[str/,ct Property (NEC of Burwell and Montgomery, Parcel No.
142401-3-064-2008), I would like to take this opportunity to respond to the City's draft of the Charleston
Community Plan ("CCP"), dated April 16, 1997. My property lies on the eastern fringe of the Charleston
Community, with frontage on a major transportation route (the northeast corner of Montgomery and
Bur'well). Our current development concept for this site is auto oriented aa~ consists of four structures: 1)
a convenience store/gas Station/fast food facility; 2) a tunnel ca~ wash; 3) a fast food restaurant; and 3)
four, connected soil-serve car wash bays. "
All of these auto-oriented uses are consistent with the current GB (general business) zoning for this area
and appear to be allowable uses under t~he CCP. Our proposed site use will generate a vehicular, not
pedestrian, customer base which is consistent with the CCP. In fact, the ch'aft CCP recommend~ the
development o~_~ew parking_ lots frontir~g Montgomery Avenue (Policy I, page 15). That
recommendation clearly acknowledges thc importance of this traffic corridor and its hegvy usc by
automobiles.
The function of a convenience store/gas station/fast food facility dictates certain traditional circulation
patterns which affect its location and orientation on a site. An intersection-oriented building placement, set
back from a comer, enhances the visibility of the service station and provides security during the evening
hours. It also allows easy automobile access to gasoline pumps and fast food, drive-through windows.
To enhance pedestrian safety, zones are designated on these type of sites to permit customers to cross
circulation areas easily.
By contrast,//' tkis type of facility is located at a corner, its function forces it to be placed with "its back to
the street" (rear walls in this type of building are windowless due to their functional requirements of their
floor plans). Only one door can be used. In this type of scenario, pedestrians have to be routed around
the sides of the building in order to enter the building.
Appendix E, page 5 o£ the CCP indicates that automotive services, gas stations, car washes .knd related
,ervice$1~ throughout the Charleston District zone under Special U~e Permits (with the
exception o.f, p.roperties fronting on Callow between Burwell and Eleventh). 55thai criteria will the City use
to delermin~ whethe?' or not th~se uses a~'e_perm~ge_d7 If these uses ar¢_cu~re_ntI~allo'~able, ,&'hat ~o¢I~__:
m~li~ale the City ~o deny or condition these ~,~ses~
E-43
Donald b. Pratt
May 19, 1997
Page 2
Further, it ap]peas that the five SUP criteria in the City's 1997 zoning code are somewhat redundant.
These requirements, and our comments regarding them, are'provided below.
(1) Is the proposal consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and either designated "SUP" in the
Zorfing Ordinance, or is being processed as an "Unlisted Use"?
· The uses in our proposal are consistent with the City's 199'1 zoning for this
area which is "GB" (General Business). These uses are categorized as
"Eating & Drinking" and "Auto/Transportation". Under the CCP, these
uses appear in the same categories, but the "Auto/Transportation" uses are
shown as "SUP".
(2) Will the proposal comply with all applicable development standards and requirements, including
the ava/Jabilky of all needed utilities and services?
· These standards and requirements are met through the standard plan review
process.
(3) Will the proposal, along %vith any mitigation measures or other conditions of approval, avoid
significant adverse envkonmental consequences?
· SEPA already provides for adequate mitigation measures.
(4) Will the proposal be compatible with adjacent uses and surrounding neighbarhood?
· The surrounding Charleston Neighborhood is primarily a buslne~s district
comprised of mixed use development, pedestrian activities, retail and
service business. Surrounding uses on three sides are "OBt' (to the north
is a large grocery store; to the west and south are retail businesses). To
the east are single family residences zoned "MDR" (8 to 1.8 dwelling units
per acre) with buffering and screening requirements in place.
(5) Does the proposal comply with all other criteria or design guidelines that are applicable to the
specific use or type of development?
· These standards and requirements are met through the standard plan review
process.
E-44
Donald L. Pratt
May 19, 1997
Page 3
Thc City should clearly articulate its concerns and intentions regarding allowable uses ia the Charleston
Community, Thc City must also specifically idtntify proposed criteria changes to thc SUP requirements,
It is ca'~cial that this information be made available to property owners in thc Charleston Community prior
to thc finalization of the CCI:' so that a complete understanding o£the plan can be achieved. Thank: you for
your consideration of our coacems. We look forward to continued dialog on this subject.
Very truly yours,
Dean Straley
E-45
[t~I ~' t:. ,',
, '~''; '-.~J; .....
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DE~'E~L'OP~E'NT' '
OFSICE O~ ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
l'il 2~s~ Avenue S, W. * P.O, Box 483~3 * Ol~pia, Wa~hinjton 98304.8343 · (206)7~3.4011 * SCAN234-4011
M~y 20, 1997
Mr. Donald Pratt
Director of Community Development
286 4th Street
Bremerton., Washington 98337
Dear Mr. Pratt:
Thank you for sending a copy of the Draft Charleston Commu.nity Plan and Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DE!S) to the Washington State Office of Archaeology
and Historic Preservation (OAHP). On behalf of OAHP, I have reviewed the Draft Plan
and ElS to assess potential impacts on historic properties in the neighborhood.
In general, I support the Plan and its recommendations. This support'is a result of
statements which acknowledge the importance of the community's heritage and tke need
to protect the kistoric character of buildings in the neighborhood. In particular I note and
support vision siatements and objectives found on pages 7 and 8. In addition, I note and
support recommendations in the Plan for developing design standards for the
neighborhood. I recommend that proposed design guidelines for Charleston use as a
basis lhe U.S. ,gecretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Secondly, I
recommend that a comprehensive survey be undertaken of tb_e neighborhood to identify
properties with historical re'Id/or architectural significance. This survey should be
generated by a qualified pro'fessional historian/architectural historian. Data generated
from this effort can be used by the City.' to inform development of design guidelines,
protection strategies for significant properties, implementation of preservation incentives,
historic overlay zoning, and other historic preservation planning strategies for Charleston.
In addition to the general comments above, following are comments/recommendations on
specific elements of'the Plan:
I note and support Policy 2 on page 18.
E-46
Mr. Donald L- Pratt
May 20, 1997
Page Two
* In regard to Action B on page 19, use of Bremerton's low-interest loan program
for aesthetic elements ~l~ould be implemented to be in accord with design
guidelines for the district and take into consideration a¢cepled rehabilitation
practices such as found in the Secretary's Standards.
* See general comments above in regaxd to Action E on page i9.
* In regard 1o Policy 1 on page 25, I recommend that this policy be implemented
after completion of the historic property survey so that results can be used to
guide decisions about thc historical and/or architectural significance of buildings.
I note and support Policy 2 on page 25.
1 recommend implementation of Action C on page 25 only' in conjunction with an
overall preservation strategy for the neighborhood following a survey of historic
properties and development of design guidelines.
* In ~egard to Action C on page 27, plus Action C and Action D on pages 36 a~d 37
respectively, I reference comments above ~recommending inclusion ~3fthe U.S.
Secretary of the £nterior's Standards for Rehabilitation as tlxe foundation for
design guidelines not only for historic propcrtie~, but also additions to historic '
properties and/.u-fill development.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to review emd comment on the Draft Plan for
Charleston. The Plan hold~-exciting promise for using historic preservation tools toward
revitalization of the neighborhood. Should you have any questions, plea.se feel free to
contact me at (360) 753-9116.
Sincerely,
Gr y Oriffi~
~ive Planning Specialist
GAG
E-47
TO WHOM IN MAY CONCERN
THE MEMBERS OF THE CHARLESTON BUSINESS COMMUNITY WOULD LIKE
TO EXPRESS OUR OPINIONS TO CITY OF BREMERTON AND THE DEPT. OF
DEVELOPMENT. WE RECOGNIZE THAT THE CHARLESTON BUSINESS DISTRICT
WILL BE 774E FIRST THING THAT PEOPLE SEE ON ENTERING THE NEW GATEWAY
TO BREMERTON AND WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS AND
OBJECTIVES OF THE CHARLESTON COMMUNITY PLAN.
1. THE BREMERTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS A 20 YEAR PLAN
2. THE CITY WILL USE TIlE GENERAL POLICY STATEMENTS IN TI{E
CHARLESTON COMMUNITY PLAN TO GUIDE FUTURE DECISIONS
INVOLVED IN DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
3. THIS COMMUNITY PLAN IS INTENDED TO BE USED BY CITY OFFICIALS
4. THIS PLAN WAS DEVELOPED BY THE CITY WITH VERY LIMITED INPUT
FROM MEMBERS OF THE CHARLESTON BUSINESS COMMUNITY.
AS BUSINESS COMMUNITY MEMBERS WE WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THE
FOLLOWING ACTIONS TO THE CITY OF BREMERTON AND DEPT. OF PLANNING.
1. DO NOT CHANGE THE LAND USE ZONING,
THIS WILL ONLY DISCOURAGE BUSINESS PEOPLE FROM WANTING TO INVEST
TIME AND MONEY IN THE CHARLESTON BUSINESS DISTRICT. THE ONE TI-lING
THAT HAS KEPT INVESTORS OUT OF THE AREA HAS BEEN THE CONSTANT
CHANGES THAT TH]E CITY KEEPS TRYING TO FORCE ON THE AREA. LEAVE
THE ZONING GB. DO NOT CHANGE TIKE ZONING IN CHARLESTON BUSINESS
DISTRICT(DO NOT ADOPT A NEW CD ZONE). LEAVE THE AREA ALONE.
2. ACCESS TO CALLOW BUSINESS'S AND PARKING SHOULD BE A
PRIORITY.
TO NOT ALLOWED AUTOMOBILES INSDE CERTAIN ZONES WILL HURT THIS
AREA_CHARLESTON BUSINESSES ARE AUTO - ORIENTED BUSINESSES PLEASE
UNDER STAND THIS. PRESERVE THE PARKING ON CALLOW ( on street parking).IT
IS A MUST WITH THE BUSINESSES THAT EXIST ON CALLOW BETWEEN
BURWELL STREET AND 11TM STREETS. THE AUTO AND ITS USE IS PARAMOUNT
TO THE BUSINESS DISTRICT OF CALLOW AND IF FLITURE PARKING LOTS THAT
FRONT ON CALLOW ARE NOT ALLOWED IT WILL HAMPER BUSINESS. TRAFFIC
IS ONLY A PROBLEM 1 HOUR A DAY. (NOTE SEVERAL BUSINESS OWNERS
WERE ON THE STREET COMMITTEE).
E-48
3. ENCOURAGE PROPER-1-Y AND BUSINESS OWNERS TO INVEST MONEY
IN THE CHARLESTON(CALLOW) BUSINESS DISTRICT. PLEASE DO NOT
TRY TO REGULATE PEOPLE TO INVEST IN THE AREA.
THERE ARE A LOT OF CALLOW BUSINESS PEOPLE THAT WORK ~
TO MAKE A LIVING. WHEN PEOPLE WANT TO INVEST MONEY IN THE
AREA THEY WILL DO SO.LANDSCAPING IS NICE BUT DO NOT FORCE IT
ON THE BUSINESS MERCHANTS. A NICE LANDSCAPED PARKING LOT IS
A LOT BETI'ER THEN AN OLD BROKEN DOWN EMPTY BUILDING.
THANK YOU SIGNED
NAME BUSINESS/PROPERTY OWNER
E-49
ftaron '
(360) 377-6879
5610 KITSAP WAY, g 100
BREMERTON, WASHINGTON 98312
=~~1997
K~ W~on
C~ OF B~RTON
Pla~g D:pa~t
239 4m
Br=m~on, WA 98311
D~ar Kay:
I r~a~ with kl~r~s~ your Charleston Co~ud~ Plan. I Now aa~ th~ City of
Br~meaon want, to hdp fl~e bm~ss~s and prop~ own~ and I ~ tl~y a~ appr~ciat~
your good int~nfiom. I don't b~w ~at ~e ch~g~s you want to m~ in th~ zo~g w~
k~ a kenefcial ag:ok kow=~r, oa~ tkan a~o~g apaam~n~ on tll: s:cona lloor. E
· = Ci~ oodd lo,ow ~o~ on a~ ~STRUCT~ ~t t~ b~n prom~d for a~
I~ a~eral y~, tNs would b~ th~ most ~poaant ~g ~ could do for the Charleston
~a. FMk ~y prom~d to b~d ~= n~w Ch~leston I~way approach. Thor~ ~o a
numb~ of u~ ~d ,:w~ ~oj~cm that haw b~n ~opos~d and pl~:d. RanO Wi,
- s~d l~t N~t that fl~e City w~ sta~ ~ prdcct next ye~.
~e t~g I t~ would be a ~g ~set to the area and show the Ci~'s good
~tention, would be to make a new 4-lane tree ~cd street from the new Mon~omeu Gate
lo Bu~eH. ~e Na~ has made a substantial ~vestment ~ this area and the Ci~ looks ~e
"cheap count~ com~s" when you come out of file Mon~ome~ Avenue Gate. ~fis is
one of the most despicable are~ of old bufld~ ~ the City, and adjacent to a vc~T nmxow
street.
Quic~y gong flu'ou~ your cotmu~ pla~ I would ~e to make file fogow~g
co~en~. You are propos~g on P-5, ~at the population ~ have a ~emendous
~cre~e, ~eater fl~ s~ce W.W.~. ~en on p~e P-13, yo~ proposh~ to presmwe
on-s~eet par~g on C~ow A~nue. Keep ~ ~d ~at Ca,ow is an ex~eme¢ na~ow
sffee~ wifl~ few e~ par~ spaces, ~d wi~ fl~e new h~lway co~g ~ ~d the
population ~crease, ~s 2-lane s~eet ~ not be able to h~dle the ~affic and ~ have to
be made 4 lane, whch wffi e~ate the par~g. I tl~ we afl a~ecd at the mcethg last
~t flint file bufld~ on Ca~ow are o1~ m down, framed b~d~ and when new
bufld~gs are bu~[ they should prohde thek own off-s~eet park~g. Page P-15, you
surest ~at na~ow lots should ~ reed for par~g. ~at is aH well and good, but I be~eve
that Mde par~g Io~ with lan~cap~g are much more ~g for the remfl customer.
P~e P-17, Pokey 1, I ~ comfy ~ favor of. On P-18, you arc su~est~g this area h~
the most ~ordable urb~ neighborhoods ~ ~ap count. ~at you really mean is that
you have thc most dilapidated, run-down ho~c8 hi l~lsap coutdy. P-19, Acli{m C, 1
c~ am ~ f~or of the ci~'s Home B~em Assistance Pro,am.
. COMMERCIAL · DESIGNING ~ LEASING · FINANCING ·
I.'ESIDEN[IAL
II?AL) lNG
SINCE 1956
Kay W~sot~
~v~y 7, 199'7
Page 2
Action E, I beli~'e we should follow the Navy's design thcy have used on thch'
fences and the same type of landscaping they have u~ed. You're proposing there w4,11 be a
population of 5,400 military personnel, plus 4,700 on slfips. Again, this calks for a new
Montgomery Gaie to Burwelt street ira!movement program and ortly reinl"orce~ practical
¢lJmination of parking on Callow. On P-22, I like thc idea of an indoor recreational facility
for thi~ area. Being realistic, with the Navy)s now recreational hcilifies they are building
and the income of the people in the area, it i~ going to be a real hard sell. On P-23, Action
D, I would propose as a additional deterrent for crime, that new parking lots have a higher
than normal lighting level. On P-27, developing a street master plan should be a
brainer. I would strongb' encourage ~e area be developed .in the sam, style and design
that the Navy is doing/m the south end.
The land use proposals do not fit into the Iarge increase in population that/s .l
anticipated and will not allow for large enough apartment buildings to be built on fairly
small lots. On ?-33, I am certainly in favor of the elkmination, of any "adult" businesses.
On P-35, ~ fat as ~ zoning being more helpful to a developer, I gues~ that is in the eye~
of the beholder. It will depend on the person who is in charse of the Depamnent of
Plaxming and (he type of'decisions he makes, more than on what specific zoning is
~p?roved. The county hws been cat~ng the c[t3,'s lunch ~nd ali the new apartment houses
arc being built all around the city, just outside the city limits. On P-38, there is a lot of talk
about how great the do~vntow-n urban renewal plan is, but I have seen no indication that
anylhing i~ going to be done do,on there and '.flit is, it could not have been done under
previous zoning.
There arc many other areas fluat I would hke to touch on. THE CHARLESTON
COM2v[UNITY IS NOT A PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED PflLEA. lfyou take a ,u~'cy of
the traffic, it has become very clear that the business is generated by automobile, there i~
extremely Et-tie or no foot traffic.
Sincerely,
Joe Mentor
Copy: Randy Wilt
?lan.r¢ng Comm/s~ion
Cily CounciI
Mayur
_ E-SI
Response to Comments
Lil' John Auto Center
1. The street pattern referred to is a result of the proposed SR 304 Corridor
improvement program, a project sponsored by the WSDOT and the City. That
proposal has been previously approved by the Bremerton City Council and was
analyzed in a NEPA/SEPA EIS. It also predates activity on the Charleston
Community Plan and was considered a "given" for the Charleston Plan. The
prospect of keeping 1''-t Street open to Callow Avenue, at least for right-in/right-out
traffic, has been considered and identified as potential mitigation. The City is
currently evaluating this adjustment to determine if it would be consistent with the
SR 304 project.
2. The referenced turn pocket is a result of the above referenced SR 304 project, not
the Charleston Community Plan. The Plan reflects the recent adoption of the
SR 304'corridor project by the Bremerton City Council. As it is not the City's
desire to restrict movement north on Callow from this intersection, the City will
monitor the new configuration t6 determine ff any adjustments are necessary.
3. The potential for parking to be restricted or difficult to access along 1st Street is the
result of the SR 304 corridor project referenced above and not the Charleston
Community Plan. If the identified mitigation measure which opens 1~t Street up for
right-in/right-out only is accepted, there should be no loss of parking or access
thereto.
Marvin Bruno
1. See response #1 to Lil' John Auto Center.
2. The loss of pedestrian access across Callow at 1s-t Street is the result of the SR 304
Corridor project and not the Charleston Community Plan. The City does not wish to
restrict pedestrian access. To the extent that a pedestrian crossing can be
accommodated in a safe manner and be consistent with the SR 304 project, it is
supported by this plan.
3. The observation that the urban design concept does not cover the full extent of the
Callow Business District, especially south to 1s.at Street, has led to a modification of
the Charleston Community Plan and will apply to subsequent design guidelines.
The City wants all properties in the new CD zone to benefit from the Plan. The
extent to which certain features of the urban design plan and design guidelines can
apply to each block face is, in part, a response to existing conditions and probable
future actions. As an example, the area between 1''-t Street and Callow currently
contains some auto-oriented uses with curb cuts. It also is subject to the design plan
C:\Projects\Charls96.369\Comments.doc E-52
for the SR 304 Corridor project, which entails right-of-way and/or street width
modifications. Any application of the design guidelines to this block would need to
work within these constraints.
Dean Straley
1. The uses you are considering would either be allowed outright (e.g., fast food) or by
Special Use Permit (e.g., gas station, car wash). Uses subject to a Special Use
Permit are allowed, providing-they comply with applicable criteria as you have
noted.
Until you submit required information for permitting, it is not possible to
predetermine what adjustments or mitigation requirements, if any, would be
required for your development.
Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (Gregory Griffith)
1. Regarding use of .... U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation" as
a basis for District design guidelines, the City will consider this if and when it is
determined that the Charleston District has merits sufficient to classify it as a
historic district. Unfortunately, it appears that the history of the District is more in
its role as a community retail/service center and not as a collection or concentration
of historic structures.
2. Regarding the recommendation to perform a comprehensive survey of the
neighborhood to identify properties, of historical and/or architectural significance,
the City agrees this would provide needed understanding that does not currently
exist. The City will pursue grant funds to help offset costs of the study.
3. See response to comment #1.
4. See response to comments gl and #2.
5. The City will consider this recommendation if and when a comprehensive survey is
completed. In the meantime, the City could require basic information on property
history from applicants seeking demolition permits to determine if subject properties
are even minimally eligible for historic status (i.e., of sufficient age).
6. See response to comments #1 and #2.
7. See response to comments #1 and #2.
C:\Projects\Charls96.369\Comments.doc
Petition from Business/Property Owners
1. Support for the "No Action" alternative is noted.
2. Neither of the "action" alternatives would restrict vehicular access or parking on
Callow Avenue. The Plan further recommends development of a strategy to make
more of the existing parking supply available to shoppers and visitors to the District.
Accessory parking associated with an adjacent business is allowed to front on
Callow.
3. The City has certain existing requirements that apply to development in the District
(e.g., landscaping of parking lots). These requirements would be refined and
tailored to the Charleston District through the use of design guidelines.
Joe Mentor
1. The City does plan to upgrade Montgomery from First Street to Sixth Street, but
only to an improved two-lane roadway. Traffic volumes do not warrant a four-lane
roadway.
2. Traffic projections do not support a four-lane roadway for Callow Avenue. The new
SR 304 corridor project and traffic calming recommendations in the Charleston Plan
are intended to take pressure off of Callow and thereby allow it to better serve
District businesses.
3. Lighting levels in parking lots (and along sidewalks) do need to be uniform and of
sufficient strength to provide a safe environment. They also need to be matched to
the presence of surrounding housing and not become a visual deterrent to
development of that housing. More value will be gained from creating a sense of
"neighborhood" for the District.
4. Bremerton has reviewed its overall housing capacity and has concluded that there is
more than adequate reserve to accommodate projected growth and meet the
requirements of the Growth Management Act as they relate to Kitsap County and the
City.
C:\Projects\Charls96.369\Comments.doc E-54
Charleston Community Plan
PROPOSED CHANGES
INTRODUCTION
The following changes are proposed to the draft Charleston Community Plan in response to
written and oral public comments received by the June 11 City Council public hearing on the
Plan.
PROPOSED PLAN CHANGES
LAND USE
[] Pg. P-JO, Figure P2, Charleston Community Plan (Map) and
Appendix "E", Page 7, Charleston Community Proposed Zoning (Map):
1. Designate properties shown on the official -J ~-- '
Right-of-Way Acquisition map for either
right-of-way or residential purposes, unless
other known uses are anticipated. This will
result in the following changes to both the
Charleston Plan Map and Zoning Map:
a. South of FarragutAvenue: Coo~,~
. No change to Proposed Plan and Zoning.
b. Farragut to Rodgers:
All areas proposed for-acquisition to
be shown as ROW.
c. Rodgers to First:
All areas proposed for acquisition
to be shown as ROW, with the exception
of the area north of Coontz and east of
Wycoff which will be designated "T" ...:;
(transportation) on the Plan Map and
zoned "IP" (Industrial Park) on the
Zoning Map to accommodate planned
expansion of Kitsap Transit.
2. Remove proposed General Business (GB) zoning of property at NE corner of
Rogers and Cambrian. (All but one parcel will be shown as ROW; the remaining
parcel will be kept in its present Duplex Residential (DR) zoning.
3. Expand CD plan designation and zone to include:
a. The existing taverns, uphol'stery shop, flower shop, espresso drive-through,
grocery store, dog gro9ming shop, .and other existing businesses in the vicinity
of Sixth & Wycoff.
b. The Knights of Columbus Hall, hobby shop, and adjacent accessory parking
lot at the SE corner of Burwell and Montgomery. (See next_page)
E-55
SUGGESTED ADJUSTMENTS
to the proposed "CD" Zone
Expand the zone to include CD
the Fandango Tavern, Brewski's
Tavern and upholstery shop,
Mark's Flowers and espresso
drive-through, the grocery store,
the dog grooming shop, and w~.
other existing businesses in the
vicinity of Sixth & Wycoff.
Expand the zone to include the
Knights of Columbus Hall, ] '"' '
Pouisbo Pacific Hobby Shop, and
the adjacent accessory parking $~.
lot at the SE corner of Burwell .....
and Montgomery. _
PSNS
TRANSPORTATION
· Pg. P-J2, Providing Good Public Streets and Sidewalks -- ~4dd:
Action B: Investigate the feasibility ot' right-turn-in and right-turn~out lanes on the west · side of Callow at First Street.
· Pg. P-J4, Putting Parking in the Right Locations -- .4dd:
Action B: Consider forming a public development authority to construct public parking
lots and/or parking structures.
· Pg. P-16, Rediscovering the Pedestrian -- Add:
Action B: Investigate the feasibility of a crosswalk on Callow at First Street.
· Pg. P-I6, Rediscovering the Pedestrian -- Add:
Action C. Burwell Street Hill Climb:
1. Narrow the curb-to-curb width of Burwell from Wycoff eastward to the
alley to accommodate one lane of traffic in an eastbound direction. These
improvements would be designed and signed in accordance with City
street standards and would include provisions for access to private
properties as necessary.
2. Create a pedestrian-friendly "hill climb" between Callow and Wycoff,
consisting of sidewalks, stairways, rest benches, lighting, landscaping and
street trees.
3. Continue the pedestrian system of sidewalks, landscaping, lighting and
street trees westward from Wycoff to Forest Ridge Park.
· Pg. P-i6, Rediscovering the Pedestrian -- Add:
Action C: Retain and improve the segment of Sixth Street ROW between Wycoff and
Cambrian with a hard surface walkway, improved landscaping, night lighting
and other appropriate features.
· Pg. 17, Promoting Transportation Alternatives -- Add:
Action A: Provide bike route signing through the Charleston area as appropriate.
ECONOMIC HEALTH
· Pg. P-20,'Improving the Mix of Businesses --~4dd reference to Par. 1, Line 5 (and add
mai) to Apivendix) :
(See Appendix 'T' - ?SNS Map)
Charleston Community Plan: Proposed Changes E-57 3
CAPITAL FACILITIES AND UTILITIES
· Pg. P-40, Table PI. Recommended Capital Facilities in Charleston Area -- Revise to
read:
1997- * SR304 Transportation Various Sources: Federal, 29,000,000
2003 Improvement Project State & Local
(Bremerton "Gateway" Project)
1997 * Burwell between Callow - Wycoff Street maintenance fund 1,000
2002 * Resurface Callow/Montgomery as Wastewater rates + Arterial
part of stormwater projects Street Fund
URBAN DESIGN PROPOSALS
· Pg. 26, Making Signs Work Effectively -- Add:
Action D. Place an entrance sign at First and Callow to mark the beginning of the Charleston
Business District. Use street trees, street lights, and other amenities to indicate
that the block between First and Burwell is part of the District.
APPENDICES
· Appendix "E - Pg. 2, Figure 140: Land Use Tables -- Add:
Legend: A = Use is ALLOWED OUTRIGHT in zone
SUP = Use is ALLOWED with APPROVAL of a
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
· Appendix "E" - Pg. 5, Figure 140: Land Use Tables, Auto/Transportation -- Revise:
AUTO/TRANSPORTATION Automotive Services (repair, maint., etc.) A
· Add a new Appendix "I" containing the following:
A. Identification of the Charleston Business District
B. Pedestrian-oriented Core of the "CD" Zone
C. Parking Lot Proposals
D. Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
Charleston Community Plan: Proposed Changes E-58 4
Appendices
A. Distribution List 1
B. Adopting Ordinance (following City 'Council action) 3
C. Bremerton Comprehensive Plan Specific Area C-2 6
D. History of Charleston (to be added) 10
E. Proposed New Zone: Charleston District (CD) 12
F. Planned Action 20
G. Residential Valuations (unpublished) 21
II. Business District Inventory (unpublished) 21
1. Background Information & Examples:
I-l: Identification of the Charleston Business District 22
I-2: Pedestrian-oriented Core of "CD" zone 23
1-3: Parking Lot Proposals 24
I-4: Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (proximity map) 25
I-5: Burwell Hill Climb 26
1-6: Sixth Street Hill Climb 27
- Appendix "A" -
DISTRIBUTION LIST
Charleston Community Plan and ElS
Kitsap Co. Homebuilders Suquamish Tribe Dept. of Transportation
5251 Auto Center Way ATTN: Phyllis Meyers ATTN: Cass Brotherton
Bremerton WA 98312 P.O. Bo~ 498 P.O. Box 47440
Suquamish WA 98392 Olympia WA 98504-7440
Kitsap County DCD P.S.W.Q. Action Team Dept. of Transportation
ATTN: Ron Perkerewicz ATTN: Steve Tilley ATTN: Bill Wiebe
614 Division Street MS-36 P.O. Box 40900 Mailstop 47370
Port Orchard WA 98366 Olympia WA 98504-0900 Olympia WA 98504-7300
Bremerton Planning Dept. offish & Wildlife Utilities and Transp. Com.
Commission ATTN: Steve Penland ATTN: Jeffrey Showman
286 Fourth Street P.O. Box 43155 P.O. Box 47250
Bremerton WA 98337 Olympia WA 98504-3155 Olympia WA 98504-7250
Kitsap Regional Library Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Dept. of Archeological
1301 Sylvan Way ATTN: Steve Kalinowski & Hist. Preservation
Bremerton WA 98310 501 High Street, suite 108 111 West 21st Avenue
Port Orchard WA 98366 Olympia WA 98504
Brem. School Dist. 100-C Health Department ' Department of Ecology
300 N. Montgomery Ave. ATTN: Jerry Deeter ATTN: Bonnie Simms
Bremerton WA 98312 109 Austin Drive MS-18 P.O. Box 47600
Bremerton WA 98312 Olympia WA 98504-7600
Kitsap Co. Association of Wash. Dept. of Health Department of Ecology
Realtors ATTN: Richard Sarver ATTN: Barbara Ritchie
3689 Munson Street NW P.O. Box 47822 P.O. Box 47703
Silverdale WA 98383 Olympia WA 98504-7822 Olympia WA 98504-7703
Bremerton City Council Wash. Dept. of CTED Dept. of Nat. Resources
239 Fourth Street ATTN: Heather Bailash ATTN: SEPA Center
Bremerton WA 98337 P.O. Box 48300 P.O. Box 47015
Olympia WA 98504-8300 Olympia WA 98504-7015
Bremerton -Kitsap Co. PSAPCA Dept. of Nat. Resources
Housing Auth. 110 Union Street, #500 ATTN: Eric Huart
ATTN: Norm McLaughlin Seattle WA 98101 P.O. Box47014
9625 Bayshore Drive · Olympia WA 98504-7014
Silverdale WA 98383
Appendix: 1
Dept of Wildlife
ATTN: Steve Kalinowski
5014 Huckleberry lane NW
Gig Harbor WA 98335
Social and Health Services
ATTN: Pam McPartland
P.O. Box 45848
Olympia WA 98504-5848
Supt. of Public Instruction
ATTN: Terry Michalson
P.O. Box 47200
Olympia WA 98504-7200
Dept. of Corrections
ATTN: Bob Bcrgquist
P.O. Box 41112
Olympia WA 98504-1112
Interagency Committee on
Outdoor Rec.
ATTN: Lorinda Anderson
P.O. Box 40917
Olympia WA 98504-0917
Parks & Recreation
Commission
ATTN: Judy McNickle
P.O. Box 42653
Olympia WA 98504-2653
Appendix: 2
Appendix "B"
Adopting Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE adopting the Charleston Community Plan
as an amendment to thc Bremerton'Comprehensive Plan and
adopting Related Amendments to the Text and Maps
of the Bremerto~ Zoning Code, BMC 2 ! .02.
WItEREAS, the City of Bremerton adopted a revised Comprehensive Plan by
Ordinance No. 4545 in February 1996 to comply with the Growth Management Act and with an
Order of the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan discussed the need for a "Specific Area Plan" for
the Charleston Business District to address the needs and concerns of those who live, work, shop,
or own property in the area; and
WHEREAS, Bremerton combined its resources with a community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) and a State Planning and Environmental Review Fund (PER. F) grant to develop
an Integrated GMA/SEPA plan for the Charleston District that includes the Plan, an EIS, and
specific policies and recommendations aimed at desired neighborhood improvements, including
public and private actions, a process for the streamlined approval of"planned actions",
improvement concepts for future action, and zoning amendments that include a new "Charleston
District (CD)" zone; and
WHEREA$~ the Charleston Plan was developed to comply with the provisions of the
Growth Management Act and to be consi~tent with the B~:emerton Comprehensive Plan and
related development regulations; and
WHEREAS, the preparation of the Charleston Community Plan and related
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) involved the citizens, property owners, merchants and
others in an early and continuous series of neighborhood meetings, study sessions and a public
hearing before the Planning Commission on May 20, 1997, after which the Commission
recommended Council adoption of the Plan and zoning reconunendations; and
WHEREAS, the Plan was submitted for the mandatory 60-day State agency review in
April 1997; and
Charltslon Plan Ordinnnce: Page I
Appendix: 3
WIIEREAS, the Bremerton City Council conducted a public hearing on June 11, 1997
to accept public comments and to consider the recommendations of State agencies, the public,
and the Planning Commission; now therefore
TilE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
Section 1. The Charleston Community Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", is hereby
adopted as an amendment to the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan.
Section 2. The Bremerton Zoning Code (BMC 21.02) is amended as follows:
(a) The map in Appendix Figure 070(a), delineating the Charleston Business District,
is amended per attached Exhibit "B".
(b) Appendix Figure 080, Zones, is amended to add the "CD (Charleston District)"
zone under the Commercial category per attached Exhibit "C".
(c) Appendix Figure 090, Primm3' Zone Consistency, is amended to include the "CD"
Comprehensive Plan designation and its rel~ited zones, as sh'own in Exhibit "D".
(d) Amend page 11 of Appendix Figure 120, Zone Summary to add the description,
intent, and minimum standards for the "CD" zone, as shown in Exhibit "E".
(e) Amend Appendix Figure 130, Lot Requirements, to add the development
requirements for the "CD" zone, as shown in Exhibit "F".
(t) Amend Appendix Figure 140, Land Use Tables, to establish the uses allowed in
the "CD" zone, as shown in Exhibit "G":
(g) Amend the Official Zoning Map to apply the "IP (Industrial Park)" and
(Charleston District)" zones within the "Charleston Business District"
Comprehensive Plan designation; change the zoning from "MX" to "MF" along
Wycoff Avenue generally between Coontz and Sixth Streets; and remove zoning
from lands to be within the Highway 304 right-or-way as shown in Exhibit "H".
Charleston Plan Ordinance: Page
Appendix: 4
(h) Amend Appendix Figure 600, Special Parking Districts, to indicate that all non-
residential land uses within the Charleston Business District are exempt from the
off-street parking and loading space requ!rements of the Zoning Code, as shown
in Exhibit 'T'.
(i) Amend BMC 21.02.670(a)(iv)(c) to include an off-street parking exemption for
the Charleston Business District as follows:
(c) ...... t .......... : .......... :-- Arcs Parking Exemptions.
(1) The CBD Parking Area, as shown in Figure 600, is exempt
from the off-street parking and loading space requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance.
(2)'~.~_...Th.~ ..C.h~leston gUs~e..ss .Dis~ict, ~ .shown. in Figure 600, is
~xemPt;fr.9~i~7,~ff-~sUeet P~ki~'g!.~d,!0,~g. sp~a~e:!~equireme_nts for
nbn:f~id~iitiali~
(3)~..~, ........ , Parking facilities that are provided voluntarily in
the CBD,'o.~i:Ch',ar. leston DistriCt. shall conform to the minimum design
standards of this Chapter for Class "B" lots.
APPROVED by the City Council on the first reading this
day of June, 1997.
PASSED by the Bremerton City Council this day
of ,1997.
DAVID FARR, President
Bremerton City Council
APPROVED this day of ., 1997.
LYNN S. HORTON, Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY, City Clerk
Charleston Plan Ordinance: Page 3
Appendix: 5
Appendix "C"
Bremerton Comprehensive Plan -- Specific Area
cHARLEsTON BUSINESS DiSTRICT
C.2:
· i .
:.: ..~.. ::~.. ::. :::: :~,i:,:..::._:~::::~:~ :!:;i:i::.:~.~ ,.:~. ::.
~ I
A. LOCATION: _.JJ-'~ I__/~:~ ~ ~ ~_'~ ~ L: ~ ~--~
'! "" '
The Charleston Business District is centered
around Callow Avenue, and to a lesser e~ent
Montgome~ Avenue, and concentrated pri- ; '; ~ "
and First Street on the South. The district is
irregular in shape and includes some adjacent ; ~ ~~~~ ~ ~,,.~.:.
commercial, office and light industrial busi- = '
nesses as well.
Street access to the district is excellent.
~tsap Way flows into Eleventh and Si~h
(S.R. 304) provides access from tho south to
Bu~ell Street and Callow Avenue.
The Charleston Business Distri~ is the d~nt~ ~ion
of the former ~mun~ of Char~ston, ~ich was ~n-
has been kno~ ~ the C~l~ Business Distri~. A re~nt : _
(spring 1 ~3) prop.~ owner and business que.ion~aire ~~~
found the n~e Charleston ,o have ,m~.an, historic
signifi~n~ and to be dearly preferable to Call~.
On that b~is. the area ~11 be referred to ~ the
Charleston Business Distri~ througho~ this Plan.
C. AR~ DESCRIPTION: ~
This business district is central to at least five residential neighborhoods which, in turn, are
separated from each other by a~erial streets. The a~erials function as barriers t0 effectively
prevent ease of movement or intera~ion be~een these neighborhoods. Even so,
neighborhood residents do have good access to this business district.
The business district provides a full range of retail shopping and personal se~ices. The 7/1
convenience store at the south end of the district, the Breme~on Food Outlet at Si~h and
Montgome~, and the new Safeway at Eleventh and Callow satis~ most groce~ needs.
Several restaurants, a bake~, and a tavern or ~o add varie~. Retail stores include a
spo~ing goods store, bi.cie shop, furniture stores, used and antique goods, spo~s card
shop, applian~s, and others. Sewices Include automotive repair, gas, animal care,
pawnbrokers, banks, beau~ school, hair care salons and others.
Appendix: 6
This district has a lot to offer. Unfortunately, it is also quite old and showing its age. On a
scale of 1 to 5, those responding to the business district survey gave the district an overall
quality rating of 3.5. The feature that was rated lowest was customer/employee parking
(3.9), followed closely by lack of overall visual/aesthetic appeal (3.7), lack of attractive and
effective signing (3.7), and poor physical condition of buildings (3.6). Eighty-one percent of
the respondents felt the district could become stronger if more people were living in or
around it.
Traffic considerations were rated higher than Physical conditions. Most agreed that current
traffic volumes are okay and that improved bus service would benefit the district. But most
were cool to the idea of one-way streets.'
When asked what kinds of activities would bring the greatest benefits, the highest rated
response by far was 'low-interest rehabilitation/improvement loans'. The action bringing the
least benefit was 'loosening up development regulations'. Between the extremes,
respondents felt relatively positive about a targeted code enforcement program, a voluntary
clean-up or fix-up campaign, a street tree or landscaping program, and design standards for
new buildings and signs. Some expressed frustration at the lack of organization of the
business community and the difficulty in getting individual property and business owners to
commit to district improvements. They expressed a need for coordination and leadership
from within the district itself, but with support and assistance from the City.
At least five distinct neighborhoods surround~_
the Charleston Business District. They are
separated from each other by arterial streets I JFTT]'~ F
which act as barriers to mobility and inter- l'
action.
LandU~ --P~e61
Appendix: 7
D. RE~:OMMENDATIONS:
Consistent with the City's visions related to the maintenance of healthy and attractive
neighborhoods and business districts, the following actions are recommended:
;, The City shall carefully consider the impacts of the Highway 304 improvements on the
Charleston Business District and on circulation in and around the district and new
PSNS gates and expansion area.
2. The City shall encourage the establishment of a Charleston Business District
Association that can meet regularly, discuss problems and opportunities, coordinate
promotional activities, and initiate and follow through with identified district
improvements.
3. The City shall offer to work with local property owners, businesses, and surrounding
residents in the development of a Charleston District Neighborhood Plan to include
some or all of the following:
a. A master plan for future land uses in and around the district.
b. Zoning adjustments to more directly reflect the district's growth ambitions.
c. A strategy to improve the image and visual appearance of the district, possibly
including landscaping, street trees, signing, design guidelines for new
construction and rehabilitation, and building maintenance program.
d. A plan to improve mobility through pedestrian-related improvements,
bikeways/routes, bus scheduling, bus.stop design, and other means.
E. DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW:
The Charleston Business District has retained much of its original character. The central
portion along Callow is very pedestrian-oriented with small stores, window displays,
interesting storefronts and signs, and a human scale.
New development and building rehabilitation projects can be encouraged to take into
consideration these features and design their projects accordingly. The City can assist by
advising clients of design options and by applying adopted criteria in the site plan and design
review stages of the permitting process. For a project to be in compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan, it should be found to be consistent with the following criteria:
1. Efforts to repair and rehabilitate older existing structures are. encouraged.
2. Natural exterior building materials such as wood and brick are preferred over
concrete, plastics, or metal.
Land U~e -- P~ 62
Appendix: 8
3. Exceptionally large stores should be located at the extreme north or south of the
district, or along Montgomery Street to avoid disruptions to the small business
character of central Callow Avenue.
4. Providing a higher density residential base is an important objective. One or two
stories of residential development are encouraged over street level businesses
whenever possible to bring more people into the district as residents. The City will
look for ways to assist through incentives or other means.
5. In keeping with regional and citywide transportation objectives, local district policies
will give preference to travel modes that provide alternatives to the single-occupant
vehicle. Some additional parking should be provided, but so should bicycle facilities,
improved bus service, and pedestrian amenities.
6. New parking lots should not front on Callow Avenue, but should be provided behind
the buildings, off alleys, or along Montgomery Street. The possibility of consolidating
properties to create a single large parking lot along the west side of Montgomery
between Burwell and Sixth should be investigated.
7. The present Bremerton School District administration building property at the
northeast corner of Burwell and Montgomery should be master planned for business
uses or a mixed use development that can take advantage of the high-traffic location
while also becoming a part of the business district.
8. In addition to being consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, signs are encouraged to be
simple, in scale with the buildings and surroundings, and consistent with the 'Old
Charleston" character (or other locally adopted theme} of this district. (The district
association may wish to establish design standards.)
9. All new development shall be pedestrian oriented.
a. The primary entrances to buildings and businesses shall be from the street
frontage sidewalk, particularly buildings fronting on Callow and Montgomery.
b. Street front facades shall showcase their businesses and encourage window
displays. The City will consider.a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to allow no
more than 40 percent (suggested) of a building's first floor width to consist of
solid walls to the street. ' .
10. The Zoning Ordinance shall be adjusted to encourage the continuation of established
development patterns that provide the district's character and to adjust setbacks,
parking, or other requirements that may be overly restrictive. At the same time, the
City will emphasize the importance of landscaping requirements and encourage street
trees, private landscaping, and other amenities that might enhance the visual
appearance and image of the Charleston District.
Land Use -- Page 63
Appendix: 9
Appendix "D"
History of Charleston
--- Contained in EIS ---
Appendix: 10
Appendix: 11
Appendix "E"
Proposed New Zone
"CHARLESTON DISTRICT (CO)"
Bremerton Municipal Code: 21.02
Figure 120: ZONE SUMMARY 12-A:cd-zone. pro
ZONES Description/Intent Min. Standards (See Table
z-4)
CD The intent of this zone is to strengthen the business Min. Lot Size: None
Charleston District district of the Charleston neighborhood by providing Max. Coverage: 100%
a compatible combination of allowed uses, along with Min. Lot width: None
development standards that reflect the historical Max. Bldg. Ht: 60 ft.
character and design limitations of the district. The
"CD" zone encourages compact and mixed use SETBACKS:
development, pedestrian activities, and retail and Front: No min. setbacks.
service businesses. It includes most of the uses 10 ft. max. to Callow Ave.
allowed in the "Genera_l Business (GB)" and Side: 10 ft. from resid, zones
"Professional Office (PO)" zones, but without some None from non-resid, zones
of the larger disruptive auto-oriented busineses that Rear: 10 ft. from resid, zones
often locate along highways. None from non-resid, zones
Figure 130: LOT REQUIREMENTS
CHARLESTON DISTRICT
Requirements (CD zone)
Allowed Resid. Density No density limit
Setbacks: FRONT: No min. front setback within CD zone.
10 ft. max. setback to Callow Avenue.
SIDE: 10 ft. min. setback to any residential zone.
REAR: 10 ft. min. setback to any residential zone.
Min. Lot Size None
Min. Lot width None
Maximum Height 60 ft.
Maximum Coverage 100%
Charleston District zone -- Page 1
Appendix: 12
Figure 140: LAND USE TABLES
Legend: A = The use is allowed outright as a principal use.
S = The use is subject to approval ora Special Use Permit (SUP).
P = The use is allowed only within an approved Planned Unit Development.
~ = Uses with an asterisk may not be located on properties that front on Callow Avenue
between Burwell Street and Eleventh Street.
MAJOR CD
CATEGORIES USES ALLOWED Zone
RESIDENTIAL: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) A *
Multiple-unit Structure (4 or more units) S *
Townhouse (attached units on own lots) A *
Residential --- as a secondary use. A
OTHER LODGING: Foster Home A *
Day Care Facility (13 or more -- all ages) S *
Day Care Facility (-12 or fewer -- all ages) A*
Hotel or Motel A *
Residential Hotel or Inn (weekly/monthly) A *
ENTERTAINMENT/ Theater (performing arts or motion picture) A
CULTURE
Video/Pinball Arcade S
Bowling Lanes A
Pool/Billiard Facility A
Youth or Teen Center (social/recreational) S
Senior Center (social/recreational) A
Community or Neighborhood Center A
Dance Hall or Multi-purpose Hall A
Clubhouse, Frat. Lodge, or similar A *
MEDICAL & Medical -- Out-patient Clinic A
SOCIAL SERVICES
Medical Services (diagnostic, ENT, etc.) A
Charleston District zone -- Page 2
Appendix: 13
CD
Major Categories USES ALLOWED Zone
Medical Laboratory A
Veterinarian & Animal Hospital A
Social Service Facilities A
Welfare & Charitable Svcs./Facs. A
RECREATION & HEALTH Gymnasium or similar facility A *
Indoor Athletic/Recreation Facility A
Tennis or Swim Club (or similar facility) A *
Weight Control and Aerobics A
Tanning Salon, Spa, and similar uses A
Park, Playground, or Rec. Area &Fac's. A
OTHER PUBLIC/ Private Educ. Facilities S
QUASI-PUBLIC
Religious Worship & Related Facilities A
Library A
Museum --- in designated historic building A
Museum --- other A
Art Gallery (2,000 sq. ft. or smaller) A
Art Gallery (larger than 2,000 sq.ft.) A
GOVERNMENT & Law Enforcement & Fire Facilities A
UTILITY SERVICES
Water, Sewer, Stormdrain Facilities A
Utility Substation S *
Communication Antenna/Relay Tower S
Antenna Tower (non-commercial) S
EATING & DRINKING Restaurant./Cafe (2,500 sq.ft, or larger) A
Restaurant/Cafe (Under 2,500 sq.ft.) A
Fast Food Restaurant' (no drive-through) A
Fast Food Restaurtmt (with drive-through) A
Charleston District zone -- Page 3
Appendix: 14
CD
Major Categories USES ALLOWED Zone
Food/Beverage Take-out (no inside seating) A
Donut Shop, Baded Goods, retail A
Delicatessen A
Drinking Place --- with entertainment S
Drinking Place --- without entertainment A
OTHER RETAIL BUSINESS Market - general (7,000 sq. ft. or larger) A
Market - convenience (Under 7,000 sq.ft.) A
Any busi.ness with accessory gasoline sales S *
Specialty Food Sales A
Liquor Store A
Drug Store/Pharmacy A
Furniture & Appliance Sales & Leasing A
Music Systems, Instruments, and related A
Pre-recorded Movie/Music sales and rental A
Book Store (newspapers, magazines, etc.) A
Stationery, Paper Products, Office Supplies A
Antiques and Second Hand Goods A
Sporting Goods --- sales and services A
Clothing (incl. shoes, hats, uniforms, etc.) A
Department Store (variety retail) A
Factory Outlet (accessory to on-site mfg.) A
Jewelry, Clocks, Watches and related A
Flowers, Gifts, Greeting Cards A
Toys, Hobbies, Arts and Crafts A
Cameras and Photo Supplies and Services A
Glasses & Optical Goods and Scl'vices A
Charleston District zone -- Page 4
Appendix: 15
CD
Major Categories USES ALLOWED Zone
PERSONAL SERVICES Laundry & Dry Cleaning Services A
Self-service Laundry (laundromat) A
Non-auto Repair (furniture, appliances, etc.) A
Small Engine Repair' S *
Personal Apparel Repair/Alterations A
Hair Care and Personal Grooming A
Tatooing, Body Piercing and related A
Photographic and Art Studio A
Personal/Family Counseling Services A
Personal Services --- other than listed A
Home Occupations (subject to guidelines) A
BUSINESS SERVICES Banking & Other Financial Services A
Insurance and Investment Services A
Real Estate, Title, Escrow and Similar Svcs.A
Accounting, Tax Prep. and Similar Svcs. A
Copying, Mailing, FAX, and Similar Svcs. A
Office/Business Assistance Services A
Communications/Broadcasting Studio A
Property Mgmt. & Maint. Svcs. Offices A
Property Maint. Svcs. with Supply Storage S
Consultants (Arch., Planning, Design, etc.) A
Computer assistance, training & repair svcs.A
General Offices (other than listed above) A
AUTO / TRANSPORTATION Auto, Truck, Trailer & RV Sales S *
Automotive Services (repair, maint., etc.) A *
(See ** footnote at end of table)
Charleston District ZOne -- Page 5
Appendix: 16
CD
Major Categories USES ALLOWED Zone
Motorcycle & Bicycle Sales & Service A
Automobile, Motorcycle Rental S *
Bicycle Rental A
Truck, Trailer and RV Rental S *
Marine Craft Sales and Services S *
Tires, Batteries, & Related Sales & Svcs. S *
Other Auto & Marine Accessories A
Gas Station (Incl. related services) S *
Automotive/Marine Painting & Detailing S *
Car Wash (self-service or automated) S *
Non-accessory Parking A *
Parking Structure A
Auto Impound Lot $ *
Motor Freight Transportation Facility S *
Bus Passenger Terminal A *
CONSTRUCTION Construction Services Office A
RELATED
General Hardware Sales and Services A
Lumber & Other Building Materials Sales S *
Heating, Plumbing, A/C Equip. & Services S *
Electrical Supplies & Services A
Paint, Glass, Interior Decor (carpet, drapes) A
Nursery & Garden Supplies A *
Greenhouse (primarily retail sales) A *
INDUSTRIAL / MFG. Wood Products Mfg. (furniture, cabinets...) A *
Electrical & Electronics Products Mfg. A *
Mini-warehousing (small unit storage) S *
Charleston District zone m Page 6
Appendix: 17
MAJOR CD
CATEGORIES USES ALLOWED Zone
Research, Development & Testing Svcs. S *
Professional / Scientific Instrument Mfg. S *
Printing, Publishing & Related Services A
Apparel and other Textile Products M£g. S *
Recycling Collection Station S *
Recycling Collection Station (Limited) A *
· * These uses may be permitted by SUP on properties fronting on Callow Avenue
between Burwell and Eleventh Streets.
PARKING CODE AMENDMENT:
Amend the off-street parking requirements of Bremerton Municipal Code section 21.02.670 to make all
non-residential land uses within the Charleston District exempt fi.om the off-street parking and loading
space requirements of the Zoning code.
Charleston District zone -- Page 7
Appendix: 18
r:ll~,~ [:-J.L-[:
I.
_L
._ R,d,.
[ _ '.. Park F-FI-I~
Burwell Street
I
~PSN$. :.~
SF-3 Single-unit Residential
3-8 dwellings per acre
DR Duplex Residential
3-8 dwellings per acre
. _ -.I [:b]"[:~ MF Multiple.unit Residential
I MR Mixed Residential
;z 8-44 dwellings per acre
" Porter CD Charleston District
IP Industrial Park.
- PS Parks & Schools
Appendix "F"
PLANNED ACTION
RCW 43 · 21C. 031 Significant impacts.
(1) An environmental impact statement (the detailed statement required by RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c))
shall be prepared on proposals for legislation and other major actions having a probable significant,
adverse environmental impact. The environmental impact statement may be combined with the
recommendation or report on the proposal or issued as a separate document. The substantive
decisions or recommendations shall be clearly identifiable in the combined document. Actions
categorically exempt under RCW 43.21C.110(1)(a) do not require environmental review or the
preparation of an environmental impact statement under this chapter. In a county, city, or town
planning under RCW 36.70A.040, a planned action, as provided for in subsection (2) of this section,
does not require a threshold determination or the preparation of an environmental impact statement
under this chapter, but is subject to environmental review and mitigation as provided in this chapter.
An environmental impact statement is required to analyze only those probable adverse
environmental impacts which are significant. Beneficial environmental impacts may be discussed.
The responsible official shall consult with agencies and the public to identify such impacts and limit
the scope of an environmental impact statement. The subjects listed in RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) need
not be treated as separate sections of an environmental impact statement. Discussions of significant
short-term and long-term environmental impacts, significant irrevocable commitments of natural
resources, significant alternatives including mitigation measures, and significant environmental
impacts which cannot be mitigated should be consolidated or included, as applicable, in those
sections of an environmental impact statement where the responsible official decides they logically
belong.
(2)(a) For purposes of this section, a planned action means one or more types of project
action that:
(i) Are designated planned actions by an ordinance or resolution adopted by a county, city, or
town Planning under RCW 36.70A.040;
(ii) Have. had the significant impacts adequately addressed in an environmental impact
statement prepared in conjunction with (A) a comprehensive plan or subarea plan adopted under
chapter 36.70A RCW, or (B) a fully contained community, a master planned resort, a master planned
development, or a phased project;
(iii) Are subsequent or implementing projects for the proposals listed in (a)(ii) of this
subsection;
(iv) Are located within an urban growth area, as defined in RCW 36.70A.030;
(v) Are not essential public facilities, as defined in RCW 36.70A.200; and
(vi) Are consistent with a comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW.
(b) A county, city, or town shall, limit planned actions to certain types of development or to
specific geographical areas that are less extensive than the jurisdictional boundaries of the county,
city, or town and may limit a planned action to a time period identified in the environmental impact
statement or the ordinance or resolution adopted under this subsection.
[1995 c 347 § 203; 1983 c 117 § 1.]
NOTES:
Finding--Severability-Part headings and table of contents not 1aw-1995 c 347: See
notes folloWing RCW 36.70A.470.
Appendix: 20
Appendix "G"
Residential Valuations
--- Unpublished---
Appendix "H"
Business District Inventory
--- Unpublished ---
Appendix: 21
Appendix "I-1"
Identification of the Charleston Business District
The Charleston Business District, as identified in this Plan, includes most non-residential
areas from First Street on the south to Thirteenth Street on the north. The pedestrian-
oriented retail center of the district is along Callow between Burwell and Eleventh.
The Plan suggests that identification signing, historic lighting, and other special features
be used to enhance the district's unique character and identity, particularly in the high-
intensity pedestrian core.
Recommendations:
1. Establish an "Old Charleston" street lighting theme along Callow Avenue from
First Street to Thirteenth and on Montgomery Street from PSNS to Eleventh
Street. Continue the theme on intersecting streets within the "CD" district.
2. Entrance/identification signs should be i........~ ~ ~i'"':::~ ?'"[:::-":'.! .... -1-· ~-.....~
Callow Avenue at First St. ~..:::j i:':::i.:::::::i
Callow Ave. at Thirteenth St. % ~'""fi i L ............ ] , ~ ~:i ..-.:~!
(for southbound traffic) ~
Sixth St. west of Bryan :'"" ,........~ r- , ,, ~ , · ,, , r-
Sixth St. near Wycoff Ave.
(for eastbound traffic) ?'"I
Burwell St. west of Bryan [':::~ i.-...~
(westbound traffic) !'""'~ ....
EleventhEleventh St. west of Callow(eastbound traffiC)st, near Montgomery ,~'_')[ ' ~ ~i! !! ~i .... ''!}'I [''''] '' [--i i:'!l
(westbound traffic) w-"; '
i..._.,i
Appendix: 22[::i[::l / Gate
Appendix "I-2"
Pedestrian-oriented Core of the "CD" Zone
The proposed new "Charleston District" zone includes a list of allowed land uses and
businesses. Most will be compatible the zone and will strengthen its pedestrian-oriented
core. A number of other uses and businesses that are less compatible or auto-oriented
would also be permitted within the zone but would be restricted from the pedestrian core
area. The "pedestrian core" includes properties that front on Callow Avenue between
Burwell and Eleventh Streets as shown on the roi'lowing map.
! i'i:'":::'::! [Z.:!~[.!:!~ !i.2.h2! l~.t.:-_:ii.t ~ ....... ~ !:.~._~1~_.-].., t::::':::IL
I"
~'"'~" 1! !5'''::[':r~i !.-.-.-ff"'"'l F"I~.-:.-
!.'.ZZi i...-4 i--..~. I'--1 "-"
('"'-'~ ...... ! ....... i~---i ~......~-
i ...... ~ ....... i.....q !,..-,: t...-..!~ .......
~ ..... iiiiiiii!, ........ t ............ :-.! !....-..! !.-.-I J"--!i .....
~'ede,trian Core: ~......~.---;., ........ '.: i ,'"r"il:i":'t F::t!:.'.::
........ ,! ...... ~ ..................... I '"L'.l~l~ Sti,'~
"Charleston Business District (CD)" ' .....
zone. Within that zone, the shaded ,;.E.L.: ~ [:;iiiiii ,i~:::' "';-'i"Tr"r ....
' L..,...[..., ...... I ........ l..] ....
area identifies the "pedestrian core".
...... [I! l
: ...... , "i '~'F .......
·
· " '~: L.I...LI..L.LLt--~-~ [..--
F.:.':.!~ ..i i'"-'I :..,....,...,~.,..~...l..~
L:..-.] ~'~'t,,. 'xl ,-r--w' :~ I']
' EL.J..L...,..F..L.,
i"---i I'"'"!I -
, ..... , ~ ....... I;;Z! ~::.,. E
ii ' -~ :. iLZ
i
'271 :'-'!E2'.'3 I;_'..-..11"'"3, ' "'-'[_...,1:~ ......
Appendix: 23 gomery
Gate
Appendix "I-3"
Parking Lot Proposals
Adequate and convenient parking is a primary concern of the Charleston merchants. An
inventory of on-street and off-street parking spaces found a total of 1,361 spaces.
Although there is a perceived parking shortage, there is not a deficiency of spaces. The
problem is availability. Most parking lots are privately owned, many are poorly
maintained, and most are reserved for specific businesses and not available to the
customers of others. The Plan found that the primary problem is not a lack of parking,
but a lack of parking coordination and management which can be corrected most
appropriately through the cooperation of parking lot owners and merchants.
This business district can become a thriving economically successful and attractive
district. To help this happen, the Plan encourages infill and redevelopment to maintain a
continuous pedestrian-oriented retail core from Burwell to Eleventh. Some land uses and
businesses would not be allowed within this pedestrian core. Included on the list of non-
pedestrian businesses is "Non-accessory Parking", which includes public and private
parking lots that are not directly related to (accessory to) a particular business. Such lots
would be allowed to locate anywhere in the "CD" zone except within the pedestrian core.
Parking areas that are provided to serve the needs of a particular business are considered
"Accessory Parking Lots" and may be provided to serve the needs of local businesses.
These lots may replace demolished older buildings and must meet the City's minimum
development standards for Class "A;' Lots, as provided in the City's Zoning Code. To
provide a quality appearance and minimal conflicts with the pedestrian environment,
Class "A" lots must be paved and provide a 10 ft. landscaped setback from the front
property line.
The following illustration shows how a Class "A" accessory parking lot might be
provided on a typical 60 ft. wide infill lot on Callow Avenue.
Appendix "I-4"
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
[Proximity to the Charleston Business District]
[2_[
PUGET SOUND
NAVAL SHIPYARD
Relationship to the
Charleston District
:1171
1511.I'_-1
"1-1'-I-1
Appendix: 25
Appendix "I-5"
Burwell Hill Climb
The City is considering the closure or partial closure of a portion of Burwell Street
between Wycoff and the alley between Wycoff and Callow. This street segment is very
steep and hampered by visibility limitations. The alley should remain available for local
vehicular access. Access to the alley from Callow via Burwell is important.
Improving pedestrian linkages between the Charleston Business District and its
surrounding neighborhoods is an important objective of this Plan. The Burwell Street
right-of-way has the potential to become an important pedestrian link between the west
side neighborhoods, the business district, and Forest Ridge Park. Improvements to its
sidewalk system could (1) encourage pedestrians to walk to and from the business
district, (2) establish an attractive landscaped walkway between these two important
areas, and (3) make more effective use of the Buvwell right-of-way.
Recommendation-- Add:
Action C. Burwell Street Hill Climb:
1. Narrow the curb-to-curb width of Burwell from Wycoff eastward to the
alley to accommodate one lane of traffic in an eastbound direction. These
improvements would be designed and signed in accordance with City
street standards and would include provisions for access to private
properties as necessary.
2. Create a pedestrian-friendly "hill climb" between Callow and Wycoff,
consisting of sidewalks, stairways, rest benches, lighting, landscaping and
street trees.
3. Continue the pedestrian system of sidewalks, landscaping, lighting and
street trees westward from Wycoff to Forest Ridge Park.
3
I Appendix: 26 I I
Appendix "I-6"
Sixth Street Hill Climb
A short segment of the Sixth Street right-of-way between Wycoff and Cambrian is steep,
overgrown with vegetation. It is not likely to be developed as a roadway. For years,
residents of the neighborhood to the west have been using a primitive trail through this
ROW for access to the business district. This is a natural pedestrian connector.
Relatively minor landscaping and walkway improvements could encourage pedestrian
travel, increase local business patronage, and improve the view of the hillside from
Kitsap Way. Enhanced pedestrian access to local businesses is important to the district,
'is in everyone's best interests, and is consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan.
Proposal: Improve this ,.
steep undeveloped public
right-of-way with a hard
--
surface pedestrian walkway
to link the Charleston
Business District with the
neighborhood and
Forest Ridge Park. Sign
~ igna
Appendix: 27
Exhibit "C"
Figure 080
ZONES
The following table lists the zones that are iancluded in this Zoning Code, by major
category of Residential, Commercial, Industrial and Special Purpose:
RESIDENTIAL: SF-1 Res. Low-density (1-3 DU/Acre-- Single-unit)
SF-2 Res. Low-density (1-8 DU/Acre-- Single-unit)
SF-3 Res. Low-density (3-8 DU/Acre-- Single-unit)
DR Res. Low-density (3-8 DU/Acre -- 1- & 2-unit)
MF Res. Medium-density (8-18 DU/Acre -- Multi-unit)
CBR Res. Medium-density (8-18 DU/Acre -- Multi-unit/mixed)
MR Res. High-density (8-44 DU/Acre-- Multi-unit/mixed)
COMMERCIAL: PO Professional Office
NB Neighborhood Business
GB General Business
SC Shopping Center
BC Business Core
CD Charleston District
INDUSTRIAL: BP Business Park
IP Industrial Park
IG Industrial General
SPECIAL MX Mixed Use
PURPOSE: SMU Shoreline Mixed Use
HC Health Care
PS Parks & Schools
FM Forest Management
WS Water Supply
URD Urban Renewal District
DRO Design Review Overlay
LPO Limit6d Parking Overlay
Exhibit "D"
Figure 090
PRIMARY ZONE CONSISTENCY
For purposes of initial zoning and consideration of rezone requests, these primary zones
are considered to be consistent with their related Comprehensive Plan designations.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PRIMARY ZONES
LDR: Low-density Residential SF-I: Res. Low-density (single-unit)
3 to 8 DU/Acre SF-2: Res. Low-density (single-unit)
SF-3: Res. Low-density (single-unit)
DR: Res. Low-density (1- & 2-unit)
LPO: Limited Parking Overlay
PS: Parks & Schools
MDR: Medium-density Residential MF: Res. Med.-density (multi-unit)
8 to 18 DU/Acre CBR: Res. Med.-density (multi-unit/mixed)
SMU: Shoreline Mixed Use
LPO: Limited Parking Overlay
PS: Parks & Schools
HDR: High-density Residential MR: Res. High-density (multi-unit/mixed)
More than 18 DU/Acre SMU: Shoreline Mixed Use
LPO: Limited Parking Overlay
PS: Parks & Schools
C-G: General & Highway GB: General Business
Commercial SC: Shopping Center
HC: Health Care
SMU: Shoreline Mixed Use
C-P: General & Professional Offices PO: Professional Office
HC: Health Care
SMU: Shoreline Mixed Use
CBD: Central Business District BC: Business Core
GB: General Business
PO: Professional Office
MF: Res. Med.-density (multi-unit/mixed)
MR: Res. High-density (multi-unit/mixed)
URD: Urban Renewal District
DRO: Design Review Overlay
CD: Charleston District CD: Charleston District
IP: Industrial Park
BP: Business Park
PO: Professional Office
Title 21 Appendix: Page 7
Exhibit "E"
ZONES Description/Intent Min. Standards (See Table Z-4)
NB The NB zone provides areas for limited retail activity Min. Lot Size: None
and personal services in or adjacent to residential areas Max. Coverage: 50%
Neighborhood for the convenience ofneighb0rhood residents. Min. Lot Width: None
Business Businesses are encouraged to locate in a tight cluster Max. Bldg. Ht: 30 ft.
and reflect the scale and'character of th~ surrounding Max. Bldg. Size: 5,000 s.f.
neighborhood. Businesses that have a community-
wide or regional market or service area, or that have SETBACKS:
large land, floor area, or parking requirements are Front: Same as abutting zone.
probably not well suited to this zone. Side: None from non-res, zones.
10 ft. (from R zones only)
Rear: 20 ft.
GB This is Bremerton's primary auto-related, highway- Min. Lot Size: None
oriented, high-intensity retail and service commercial Max. Coverage: 100%
General zone. It is designed primarily for locations along Min. Lot Width: None
Business arterial streets and allows a wide variety of business Max. Bldg. Ht: 60 fi.
and office uses. The City may limit driveway access
and require landscaped setbacks and other SETBACKS:
improvements that enhance the aesthetic and visual Front: 20 ft.
qualities, increase safety, encourage pedestrian and Side: None from non-res, zones.
transit usage, and help ensure compatibility with less 10 ft. (from R zones only)
intense adjacent land uses. Rear: None from non-res, zones.
10 ft. (from R zones only)
CD The intent of this zone is to strengthen the business Min. Lot Size: None
district of the Charleston neighborhood by providing a Max. Coverage: 100%
Charleston compatible combination.of allowed uses, along with Min. Lot Width: None
District development standards that reflect the historical Max. Bldg. Ht: 60 ft.
character and design limitations of the district. The
"CD" zone encourages compact and mixed use SETBACKS:
development, pedestrian activities, and retail and Front: No min. setbacks.
service businesses. It includes most of the uses 10 ft. max. to Callow Ave.
allowed in the "CB" and "PO" zones, but without between Burwell & 1 lth
some of the larger disruptive auto-related businesses Side: 10 fi. from resid, zones.
that often locate along highways. None from non-resid, zones
Rear: 10 ft. from resid, zones
None from non-res, zones.
SC This zone is intended to accommodate clusters of retail Min. Lot Size: None*
activity, personal services, entertainment, and office Max. Coverage: None*
Shopping Center uses in accessible, well-designed, and pedestrian- Min. Lot Width: None*
oriented shopping centers. These centers should Max. Bldg. Ht: None*
provide more desirable alternatives to strip-commercial
development. These centers will be larger than * Shopping Center development
neighborhood business centers in scale and use, and requires a master plan consistent
will usually be anchored by a junior department store, with City PUD standards and
variety store, major supermarket, or may consist of a approved through the PUD
combination of smaller stores and offices, process.
Title 21 Appendix: Page 1 1
Exhibit "F"
Figure 130
LOT REQUIREMENTS
ALLOWED 2 3 MIN. MIN.
ZONES RESID. ~ FRONT SIDE REAR LOT LOT MAX. MAX.
DENSITY Setback Setback Setback SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT COVERAGE
SF-1 1-3 DU/Ac. 20 ft. 10 ft. 15 ft. 13,000 s.f. 60 ft. 30 ft.. 25 %
SF2 1-8 DU/Ac. 20ft. 10ft. 15ft. 9,000 s.f. 50ft. 30ft. 30%
SF-3 3-8 DU/Ac. 15 ft. 2 5 ft. 15 ft. 5,000 s.f. 40 ft. 30 ft. 40 %
DR 3-8 DU/Ac. 15 ft. 2 5 ft. 15 ft. 4,000 s.f. 40 ft. 30 ft. 40 %
MF 8-18 DU/Ac. l0 ft. 2 5 ft. 20 ft. 3,000 s.f. 30 ft. 40 ft. 50 %
CBR 8-18 DU/Ac. l0 ft. 2 5 ft. 15 ft. 3,000 s.f. 30 ft. 30 ft. 50 %
MR 8-44 DU/Ac. 10 ft. 2 5 ft. 3 10 ft. 5,000 s.f. 40 ft. 120 ft. 60 %
PO ....... 10 ft. ~ ...... 5 20 ft. ' .............. 30 ft. 45 %
NB 7 ....... 10 ft. - ...... 5 20 ft. - ............. 30 ft. 50 %
GB ....... 20 ft. - ...... 5 ....... 5 .............. 60 ft. 100 %
SC 6 .............. 4 ....... 4 ....... 4 ....... 6 ....... 6 ....... 6 ....... 6
BC ..................... 5 ....... 5 .............. 120 ft. 100 %
CD .............. 8 ....... 5 ....... 5 .............. 60 ft. 100 %
BP ....... 20 ft. - ...... 5 ....... 5 .............. 30 ft. 50 %
IP ....... 20 ft. - ...... 5 ....... 5 .............. 40 ft. 50 %
IG ....... 20 ft. - ...... 5 ....... 5 .............. 40 ft. 100 %
MX 8-44 DU/Ac. 10 ft. - ...... 5 ....... 5 3,000 s.f. 30 ft. 30 ft. 50 %
SMU ....... 10 ft. 5 ft. 10 ft. - ............. 40 ft. 50 %
HC ....... 10 ft. - ...... 5 ....... 5 .............. 60 ft. 60 %
PS ....... 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. - ............. 40 ft. 25 %
1 Base density ranges do not include additional incentive "bonus" densities that may be offered.
2 All garages and carports shall maintain a Front setback of 20 feet.
3 Zero Lot Line development shall add the normally-required side yard to the opposite side ofthe lot. ZLL development along
a rear property line may be approved only through the PUD process.
4 Development is subject to the same setback that is required on the residential side of the lot line for any development abutting
a residential zone. Structures higher than two stories or 30 ft. (whichever is higher) shall double the setback when abutting any
other residential zone.
5 A 10 ft. setback is required from any residential zone.
6 DeveLopment within this zone shall be consistent with a master plan approved through the PUD process.
7 An individual building may not exceed 5,000 sq.ft, in this zone.
8 Maximum setback of 10 ft. from Callow frontage between Burwell and Eleventh Streets.
Title 21 Appendix: Page 19
,,E},, l!q!qx::l or oi~UcI :x!puaddv Ig oIl!,L
[E O~ed :x!puoddv IE
ZZ OSed :x!puoddv [Z
~'Z °~ed :x!puoddv lZ oi1!£
SE o:Bed :x!puaddv IE
9E a~ed :x!puoddv IZ oI1LL
LZ O~ed :x!puoddv [E oi1!£
6E O~ed :x.tpuoddv l Z Oll!J~
S ¥ ¥ ¥ ,S ¥ ¥ (ogeao,s l!un-lletUS) gm. snoqoaeax-!m.l~
V V S S l~u~D -- ~u~snoq~
V V S V V ~uoz u~ p~n!~d s~npo~d - ~leS~lO~
V V V ,V V 'gJ~ slanpo~d sa!uoaoal~
V V S ,V S ('"sl~qe~ 'm~) '~j~ sl~npo~d poo~
V V S ~ulamaeJn~ slonpo~d ~oded
S ~u!II~ a~ded p~ a~qmn~ 'poo~
V V S S lo~ soles OmOH
V S ~lq~°ssv / '~J~ ~ somoH po~J~
V S ~u{am,ujnue~ aOll~J~ pug Ola!qoA'Ua~
V S XlqmassV~u{~magjn~ oall°m°lnv
t V S (OleSalOq~ ~l!~d) asn°quaaa9
V V S ,V V V (SOleS lle~o~ Xl~mp~
S V S ,V V V V sa!Iddns uap~D ~ ~as~nN
V V V V V V V (sade~p 'la~v) ~o,~ '~uI 'sseID
V V V V V V V sa~aS P~ sa~Iddns
V V V ,S V V V sooS ~ 'd~nb3 D~ '$~q~Id
DH a~S X~ DI dl aa a~ oa ~s ao a~ oa a~ aa~ ~ aa g g
ss as ss auozKq--pos~Ollg
0£ o~ecI :x!puoddv [E
'slooaS qluo^olH pu, ii,,vdnl~t UOOAxloq 'OAV ~OlIeD uo ~u!luo~J so!laodoad uo dFlS Xq pollltmod oae sosn oSotLL **
· sp.mpums u~!sop ii~ slootu 1! uoq~ Kiuo ~'oII¥,
.... Exhibit "H"
Elevenlh Slreel
· · Ell!
Sixth
PS 31llJl~.
Park
Bu~ell Slreel
~PSNS~
SF-3 Single-unit Residential
3*8 dwellings per acre
DR Duplex Residential
3-8 dwellings per ac~e
I~ll CBR Central Bremerton Realdenllal
e-le dwefllngs per acre
MF Multiple-unit Residential
6-18 dwellings per acre
i 8~4 dwelfinga ~r acre
~ II J~. I r"~'-~ CD Charleston District
" PaRer
~ IP Induslrlal Park
' PS Parks & Schools
~ I'l
, .~ CHARLESTON
I. I_1 I ~ COMMUNIW
I I I : ?'Proposed ": ·
ZONING '
Appendix: ]9 *~ '" ...... ~ '~'
Exhibit "1"
Figure 600
SPECIAL PARKING DISTRICTS
A WEST BREMERTON PARKING AREA:
Reduced parking provisions for multi-unit residential developments.
a CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT:
Off-street parking not required within the CBD, with the exception of the Waterfront Urban Renewal
District (See URD description in Figure 120).
C CHARLESTON BUSINESS DISTRICT:
Off-street parking not required for non-residential uses within this district. Reduced parking provisions for
the West Bremerton Parking Area apply to multi-unit residential development.
Title 21 Appendix: Page 32