HomeMy WebLinkAbout4707 ORDINANCE NO. 6170 7
AN ORDINANCE adopting the 1999 amendment to the Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan Map pursuant to RCW 36.70A.
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton has adopted its revised Comprehensive
Plan by Ordinance No. 4545 in February 1996; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bremerton amended it's revised Comprehensive Plan
and Map by Ordinance No. 4606 in September, 1997 and by Resolution No.
2702 in August, 1999; and
WHEREAS, RCW Chapter 36.70A permits the City's Comprehensive Plan
and Map to be amended no more than once per year; and
WHEREAS, the City has received the following Comprehensive Plan Map
amendment applications:
1. The David and Roxanna Jones Amendment, which changes a portion of the
Comprehensive Plan Map from "Mec~um and High Density Residential"
0VI/HDR) to "Business Park" (GB) as set out in Exhibit B rifled "Jones-
2711 Weaton Way, 2828 & 3231 Hemlock Street;" and
2. The Ghodrat and Lila Aflatooni Amendment, which changes a portion of
the Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium and High Density
Residential" (MF) to "Health Care Center" (HCC) as set out in Exhibit C
rifled "Aflatooni-804 Callahan Drive & 2802 Hemlock Street (Duplex at NE
Comer);" and
3. The Merit Company Amendment, which changes a portion of the
Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium Density Residential" (MDR) to
"General Business" (GB) as set out in Exhibit D rifled "Merit Company-
Riddell Road, West of Almira Drive, 4220 Wheaton Way;" and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to amend the Capital Facilities Element within the
Comprehensive Plan as set out in Exhibit E rifled "Revisions, 1999 Bremerton
Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Element"; and
WHEREAS, Comprehensive Plan amendments must be adopted by
ordinance; and
Page Z
WHEREAS, the Bremerton Planning Commission held punic study sessions
and meetings in January and February 2000, and after considering the staff
report and the public comments received, recommended adoption of the
proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the report of the Planning
Commission and additional public comments in open session; and
WHEREAS, based on the reports and comments, the City Council finds the
following:
1. The amendments are consistent with RCW Chapter 36.70A and will
not result in Comprehensive Plan or regulation conflicts; and
2. Any changes in development or use potential effected by the
amendments will not create significant adverse impacts on existing
sensitive land uses, businesses or residences; and
3. The amendments can be accommodated by all applicable public
services and facilities, including transportation; and
4. The amendments will help implement the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan; and
5. The amendments will have no substantive impacts beyond the City
limits; and
6. The amendments will have no cumulative adverse impact; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is concurrently passing, by separate ordinance,
Official Zoning Map amendments consistent with these Comprehensive Plan
and Comprehensive Plan Map amendments; now therefore
THE CITY OF BREMERTON DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Resolution No. 2752 is adopted by reference and incorporated
herein.
Section 2. The Comprehensive Plan Map is amended to change said Map as
follows:
A. The David and Roxanna Jones Amendment, which changes a portion of the
Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium and High Density Residential"
(M/HDR) to "Business Park" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects
property situated between Wheaton Way and Hemlock Street north of
Callahan Drive. Specifically the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/4
Page
of Section 12, Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M. and includes
parcels found in the Plat of First Addition To Sheridan Park - Plat Number
3965, Block 000, lots 158-00, 159-00 and 160-00. Said Comprehensive Plan
Map amendment is depicted in Exhibit B rifled "Jones-2711 Wheaton Way,
2828 & 3221 Hemlock Street," attached and incorporated herein; and
B. The Ghodrat and Lila Aflatooni Amendment, which changes a portion of
the Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium and High Density
Residential" (MF) to "Health Care Center" (I-ICC). Said Map Amendment
affects the property situated in the northeast comer of Hemlock Street and
Callahan Drive. Specifically, the property involved lies in the Northwest 1/4
of Section 12, Township 24 North, Range 01 East, W.M., and is described
as Lot 164-00, Block 000, of the Plat of the First Addition To Sheridan
Park, Plat Number 3965. Said Comprehensive Plan Map amendment is
depicted in Exhibit C tifled "Aflatooni-804 Callahan Drive & 2802
Hemlock Street (Duplex at NE Comer)," attached and incorporated herein;
and
C. The Merit Company Amendment, which changes a portion of the
Comprehensive Plan Map from "Medium Density Residential" (MDR) to
"General Business" (GB). Said Map Amendment affects property lying
adjacent to Wheaton Way, Riddell Road and Almira Drive. Specifically, the
property involved lies in the Northwest ¼ of Section 1, Township 24
North, Range 01 East, W.M. and involves the north thirteen (13) acres of
Tax Parcel Number 154 which is situated in the southwest comer of the
intersection of Riddell Road and Almira Drive. Said Comprehensive Plan
Map amendment is depicted in Exhibit D tiffed "Merit Company-Riddell
Road, West of Almira Drive, 4220 Wheaton Way," attached and
incorporated herein; and
Section 3. The Capital Facilities Element is amended as set out in Exhibit E
ritled "Revisions, 1999 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities
Element," attached and incorporated herein.
Section 4. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be ten (10) days from
the date of passage and publication by the Mayor and City Council.
APPROVED by the City Council of the City of Bremerton this ~/o~Jo day
of _~o, ~A~ -) ,2000.
Page
Pa s~a.~.dby the City Council of the City of Bremerton this /~ day of
,2000.
CAROL ARENDS
City Council President
APPROVED this ~. '~ day of WYx. ~_~ ,2000
LYNN HORTON
Mayor
ATTEST:
KATHLEEN McCLUSKEY
City Clerk
\ .'~ · 5956-
~ '~.,,
'"" ~ ~:,1~' -- 'N~"'. <'~'''h x ~-- ~, .... ,
-- .... -' "- ,,
~,..~ HEMLOCK STREET
kYM NO/¥:IH/~ 0E~:~ ':iA, la(]
-IO IS:iM 'QYO~I -I-I:IQQla --- ANYd~O::::)/1~:11~! 'Q J. IEilHX:I
DRA.~T REVISIONS
1999 Bremerton Comprehensive Plan
E. CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT-
Capital Facilities Program
Sanitary Sewer
Stormwater
Transportation
Water
3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezones (specifically
Capilal Facilities Plan) (PL99-0011). Lead Agency: City of
Bremerton, Department of Community Development-
Continued from January 18, 2000 meeting.
Chairman Dingfield asked if any members of the Planning Commission had any conflict of
interest or appearance of fairness on this issue. None were noted. Commissioner Dingfield asked
the members of the public in attendance if they felt any members of the Planning Commission had
any conflict of interest or appearance of fairness with this issue. None were noted.
Mr. Jon Holan, Director of Community Development, noted that this amendment and rezone
has been continued from two different meetings. There had been a meeting in December to talk
about the site specific issues, and was continued to the January 4th meeting. There were four
amendments/rezones approved at that meeting, but due to the length of the meeting the Capital
Facilities portion was carried over to the January 18'h meeting. There was not a quorum at the
January 18th meeting so it was continued to this meeting.
Amendments/Rezones approved at the January 4, 2000 Planning Commission meeting were:
Kitsap Way/Weslon Place (PL99-0011); 271 l Wheaton Way/2828 & 3231 Hemlock Street
(PL99-0015); 804 Callahan Drive/2802 Hemlock Street (PL99-0087); Riddell Road, West of'
Almira Drive - 4220 Wheaton Way (PL99-0088).
Mr. Holan indicated that there have been two new Planning Commissioners appointed since the
last discussion was held. He provided an overview of the site specific approvals that had been
made.
Mr. Holan stated that this is a yearly update to ensure the Comp Plan is current.
Chairman Dingfieid asked if the plans and accommodations for the Port Blakely project were
included.
Mr. Holan stated that he believed that amendment was made last year. The water service
boundary areas were added as part of that amendment.
A motion was made by Commissioner Griggs and seconded by Commissioner Kosusko to
approve the Capital Facilities Element (Capital Facilities Program) of the Comprehensive
Plan Amendments (PL99-001 l).
Chairman Dingfield asked for a vote from the Commissioners: Commissioner Boyd, yes;
Commissioner Griggs, yes; Commissioner Kosusko, yes; Commissioner Moshay, yes;
Chairman Dingfield, yes. Motion passes
Planning Commission Meeting February 15, 2000 - Page 23 of 24
F. Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary sewer facilities are provided by the Bremerton Department of Public Works and Utilities.
A complete inventory, analysis of need, and capital improvements program are provided in the
adopted Wastewater Comprehensive Plan (a.k.a. the "Wastewater Plan").
1. Service Area
The Wastewater Comprehensive Plan identifies a service area consisting of territory
currently served by the Wastewater Utility, as well as areas adjacent to the city limits that
are not now serviced but which could logically be served based on natural topography.
The service area covers 13 drainage basins, of which five extend beyond the city limits
into unincorporated county areas: Kitsap Lake, Tracyton Beach, Trenton Avenue, Sinclair
Park, and Oyster Bay. The Utility provides sewage treatment to the sewered areas in the
service area through direct service and through specific contractual agreements with the
U.S. Navy and Kitsap County Sewer Distdct No. 1 (Navy Yard City). (Figure CF-4
Bremerton Wastewater System Service Area)
The Port of Bremerton operates a public wastewater facility located in Olympic View
Industrial Park (OVIP) on State Route 3 west of Gorst. The Port is exploring alternatives
to provide this area with high level municipal sewer. The Port District has contacted
Sewer Distdct #5, Kitsap County Public Works, and the City of Bremerton for improved
sewer service and has no formally contracted sewer service. Preliminary Port discussions
indicate they will seek service from Port Orchard/Sewer Distdct #5.
2. Inventory of Existinq Facilities
The City sewerage system consists of sewage collection, transmission, treatment, and
bio-solids utilization facilities. Included are more than 188 miles of gravity sewers,
approximately 16 miles of pressure lines, and 33 pump stations. These facilities convey
sewage to a secondary wastewater treatment plant located just south of West Hills, at the
intersection of SR3 and SR304. Add~ Currently~ there are -I-6 15 active combined
sewer overflow (CSO) sites located within the sewer collection system. One CSO site
(OF-17973 was abandoned in July of 1999. Another site (OF-15'~ is anticipated to be
abandoned in Seotember of 1999. reducing the number of active CSO sites to 14,
Approximately 60 percent of the system is composed of combined sanitary and
stormwater sewers. (Table SS-f)
DRAFT CFP 1 12/23/99
Sanitaq/Sewer
Bremerton Wastewater Treatment Plant (1) 1600 Oyster Bay Ave W (3) 10.1 mgd
Collection System: Pipe vadous 204 miles
Wastewater Lift stations various 33
350
Forest Enhancement Sites One & Two (2) Near Gold Mtn. Golf Course E0O acres
(1) City of Bremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, December 1995.
(2) City of Bremerton 1993 Biosolids Report to Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District.
(3) Average flow for maximum month per NPDES permit.
(a) Wastewater Treatment Plant
The existing wastewater treatment plant was designed to have a peak
hydraulic capacity of 29.5 million gallons per day (mgd). Peak flows ~n
excess of 25 mgd are typical during wet months. Normal dry weather peak
flow capacity without storrnwater inflow is estimated at 8, 4.5 mgd. Current
annual average and maximum monthly flows to the wastewater treatment
plant are about 8~ 65 percent of the average annual and maximum
monthly flows for which it was designed. It is estimated that 21 percent of
the annual average flow and 44 percent of the maximum month flow is
stormwater inflow.
next sc,:er~! ~,'e~r: under the C!t¥'s CSO Reduct!cn P!cn, which we:
,-,~1~, ,1~{.~1 ~.,.~ I~ ~QO/_ ~1~
Once stormwater inflow is reduced, the treatment plant will have the
~pacity to se~e approximately 58,000 people.
1 Source: City. of Bremerton Wastewater Utility.: 8/98.
DRAFT CFP 2 ~ 2/'23,/99
Sanita~ Sewer
(b) Forest Enhancement Proqram - Biosolids Utilization
The wastewater treatment plant produces approximately ¢we-millie~
gcllc,-,= 1.9 million dry pounds of anaerobically digested biosolids each
year. Because biosolids have fertilizer and soil amendment value the City
began an active land application program several years ago to utilize the
benefits of this wastewater process by-product. Biosolids are used to
enhance tree growth and, although the permitted area is substantially
greater, biosolids are currently applied to 600 35q acres of Utility-owned
forest land. Since June 1992, 100 percent of the biosolids produced at the
treatment plant have been utilized in this beneficial manner. The objective
of the City's forest enhancement program is to develop an environmentally
sound method of using the resource value of biosolids in accordance with
federal, state, and local regulations.
3. Future Needs
a. Existinq Demand
The Wastewater Plan estimates the 1990 population of the service area at
45,210, of which 38,140 were within the city limits and 7,070 outside the
city. The plan estimates that approximately 37,000 persons within the
service area were connected to the sewer system, leaving an unsewered
population of 8,210.2
Kitsap County estimates that the total 1994 service area population was
46,928.3 The City estimates that the 1996 population is approximately
52,762.4
The average annual daily flow, including stormwater inflow, is
approximately 6.0 mgd. As CSO separation occurs, the average flow will
be reduced accordingly, s However. other storm system work is anticipated
to increase flow to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Minimum peak flow
(peak flows occurring without storm water inflow) is estimated at 8 mgd.
While the U.S. Navy is allocated 3.8 mgd, it is currently discharging only 1
mgd -- roughly equivalent to 10,000 population. (Table SS-2)
2 Source: Table 1., City ofBremerton Wastewater Comprehensive Plan, December 1995, p. A-2 (Estimate
prepared in 1992).
3Source: Table SS-2. Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan Sewer Facilities - 20-Year Population
Allocation - CSF #1, Draft Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Part I1, April 1996, PG. 3-87. The
County population estimate is for the total service area, and does not include an estimate of the sewered
or unsewered populations.
4 The City population estimate is based on the Kitsap County population estimate for the unincorporated
part of the sewer service area, along with the City estimate within the city limits. (See page CFP-9)
5Source: Table SS-2. Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan Sewer Facilities - 20-Year Population
Allocation - CSF #1, Draft Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, Part II, April 1996, PG. 3-87. The
County population estimate is for the total service area, and does not include an estimate of the sewered
or unsewered populations.
DRAFT CFP 3 12/23/99
Sanitar~ Sewer
b. Level of Service (LOS)
The capacity of existing sewer facilities to serve future needs is
determined by comparing the gallons of effluent per day now approved by
the State, the number of existing connections, and the number of new
people to be served. The number of new people is converted into the
number of new residential connections based on assumptions of the
number of persons per household, and the number of gallons of effluent
generated per capita per day (gpcd). The capacity can also be estimated
based on an existing and planned LOS for sewer service.
The calculation of the current LOS excludes stormwater inflow. (-~
the City's system experiences seine infiltration. In the past it is was not
considered a major component of the flow. This is currently beina
reevaluated as oart of the CSO Reduction Plan Uodate and
Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update to be completed in 2000.'~ The
proposed LOS is the existing county-wide average.
· Current LOS = 97 gallons per capita per day (gpcd)6
· Proposed LOS = 100 gpcd
c. Future Demand
The May 1996 draft Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan estimates that a total of
66,096 persons within the sewer service area will require sanitary sewer service
by year 2012, an increase of 19,168 persons from 1992. The County plan
estimates that this increase includes 1,111 persons that were not connected to
the sewer system in 1992. (Table SS-2)
Total Population 46,321 46,928 54,370 66,096 29.92% 19,168
- Sewered 45,210 NE NE 66,096
- Unsewered 1,111 NE NE 0
Source: Table SS-2, Draft Kitsap County Capital Facilities Plan, May 1996, pg. 3-87.
The County allocation addresses years 1994 and 2000 (rather than years 1996-
2001) in order to comply with a Puget Sound Growth Headngs Board order.
S"Executive Summary", City of Bremerton Sewer Comprehensive Plan, October 1991, p. 10.
DRAFT CFP 4 12_/23/99
Sanitan/Sewer
Therefore, the City has projected service area population figures for years 1996
and 2001 based on the County forecast. (Table SS-3)
DRAFT CFP 5 12/23/99
Sanitary Sewer
1996 Service Area Population 52,762 58,000 5.28
1997-2001 New Population 2,128 3,110 0.21
Total 2001 Sewered 54,890 3,110 5.49
Population =
~!J j~ iii !J~ ~j~Jj ii iiijiji !J !ii:!ii~! !i il J~ ii iii il !i~i !J! ilJ ~Jj ij i~J~ i~J !Ji~iiiii iJ ii ii: ~i i:i:i: i:i :~:i:i: i:i:i: i:i:i: J:i:!: i:i:i: :i:i:J :J:i:~:i:i:J :i: i;J :i:J:i:i:J :J :i:::J:~:i:i:~: ~:i:~: :;i :J:i:: J:i :: :i:: i:i:i:i: i:i:i:~: i: :~: ~: ~:i :~ :~: ~:~:i;J:~:~:i:J:J:i: J;J:J:i:i:J: i:i ::::::::::::::::::::: ::: :::::: ::: :::: :: :::::: :::::::::2:: ::. :: :::;::::::;:: :::::;:::::; ::.::: ::¥ ::::::: :: :::::::2: ::::::::: :::;:::: ¥ :;; ::::: ::: :::::::::::::::::: ::: ;:: ::: ::
2001-2012 New Population (4) 11,206 (8,096) 1.12
Total 2012 Sewered Population 72,077 (14,077) 7.21
Total 1996-2012 Increase = 19,315 (4,986) 1.93
Notes: For the purposes of this projection, it is assumed that all persons within the service area will
connect to the sewer system by year 2001.
d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements
The Wastewater Plan was developed for an ultimate service area population of
80,610. Therefore, planned improvements will be adequate to serve the projected
72,077 sewered population, provided there are no major industrial hookups.
The City has participated in a feasibility study to sewer Gorst and the industrial
properties in the vicinity of the Port of Bremerton and Anderson Creek. Sewedng
all or a portion of these areas utilizing Bremerton's treatment facility are included
as options. The results of this study may affect the need and timing for treatment
plant expansion.
The City has reviewed potential demands on the wastewater system from the light
industrial/business park development of the Port Blakely property located westedy
of Kitsap Lake. In performing this review, the City converted the anticipated
demand of the light industrial/business park to its functional population equivalent.
The population equivalent was added to anticipated demand for both the six and
twenty year hodzon. Adequate reserve capacity was found to be available (with
anticipated system improvements) to accommodate the project.
e. Plans of Other Providers
The Kitsap County Public Works Department Wastewater Division is in the
process of preparing a County-Wide Wastewater Facility Plan. The draft plan
DRAFT CFP 6 12_/23/99
Sanitar7 Sewer
integrates the individual Wastewater plans within the county, and includes
recommendations for expanding county facilities to serve projected needs.
f. Proposed Facilities
The City's 1996 Wastewater Plan recommends four types of improvements at the
treatment plant to accommodate projected sewage flows at ultimate plan service
area development and to solve some current and anticipated operational
problems:
· CSO treatment capacity- a hi(~h rate clarification orocess is oroposed to
treat oeak hydraulic flows dudng storm conditions. This will provide
heeded treatment capacitv for the plant as a CSO treatment facility.:
· Infrastructure improvements -- repairs or replacements of existing sewer
system facilities to restore structural integrity;
· Regulatory requirements -- improvements needed as a result of new or
modified codes, guidelines, or laws initiated from federal, state, and local
government;
· Growth and system extensions -- improvements resulting from new
development or system extensions;
· Other system improvements -- recommendations that contribute to the
improved operation or function of the system but are not a result of
infrastructure needs, regulations, or system growth.
The Utility has acquired properties in the vicinity of the wastewater treatment
facility for future plant expansion and buffer for odor management.
The City is cc,",ducting com_~Dleted a study for reuse of wastewater treatment plant
effluent in September, 1998. The purpose of the study is to determine the
feasibility of reusing effluent for industrial use or land application, k~-Ceasible The
altematives for reuse are being evaluated .............. f,~. ;'~"*;¢'"'~, *~'". ...... "';*~ racy ~.., ~.~ *~'"~" ......
· '1*~"""'; .... * ...... '~ implementation.
The CSO reduction pan will identify additional improvements necessary to meet
the regulatory requirements. The plan will show implementation of the
improvements in accordance with the schedule dictated by the Department of
Ecology consent decree and the court order. The City is actively pursuing grant
and loan funding for these projects. The City's ability to obtain funding resources
may affect its ability to implement the schedule.
The Combined Sewer overflow Reduction Program will continue until the year
2007, specific projects will be developed and constructed in accordance with the
attached schedule. Smaller projects will be undertaken throughout the system to
reduce the combined sewer overflows as they are identified. These projects may
include pipe rerouting, combined stormwater and sewer storage, overflow
reduction modifications, pump station improvements, overflow structure
modifications and increasing flow to the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
DRAFT CFP 7 12./23/99
Sanitan/Sewer
Detailed listings of the anticipated capital projects to be developed in the next six
years are in the attached Capital Improvement program sheets.
4. Six-Year Financial Plan
It is estimated that the existing sanitary sewer system has a total capacity of 8 10.1
million gallons per day (mgd), with approximately 3 mgd available capacity, which is
sufficient to meet the total need of.5~ through the next six years, provided there
are nc major new industrial demands. (This assumes provisions for peak stormwater
treatment for wet weather flows through high rate clarification rcmc.;---I cf ~tc,,-m,,.;;ctcr from
+~. ..... , ..... ,,.........* ....... , City's )
~: ....... v ...... yecr.~ under the CSO Reduction Plan.
The six-year financial plan for sanitary sewer facilities is included in Section K of this
CFP. It is a summary of the City's Six Year (-I-996-2OO-1- ~) Wastewater Capital
Improvement Plan. Improvements are shown to be primarily Utility financed through
reimbursable loans through 2002 2004, assuming Re limited grants will be available. Of
the Non-Utility financed projects, most of the growth-related improvements are anticipated
to be financed by special utility local improvement districts (ULIDs) or by developers
directly. It is anticipated that roughly 20 percent of the expenditures beyond 2000 will be
funded by non-utility sources of revenue.
CFP Sewer 1998.doc
DRAFT CFP 8 12_/23/99
H. Stormwater
Stormwater facilities are provided by the Bremerton Department of Public Works & Utilities. The
Stormwater Utility was formed by ordinance in 1994 as a funding source for the stormwater program
mandated by the Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan. The mission of the Program is to
control flooding, enhance water quality, and protect sensitive habitat areas and local aquifers. A
~'~""+"'~ ~" 4997. The City adopted its Stormwater Management Plan in 1996.
The City's stormwater service area is the City limits. There are 14 drainage basins located within
the developed portions of Bremerton. These drainage basins closely conform to the limits of the
sewer basins identified in the City's Wastewater Comprehensive Plan. Additional drainage basins
within the Utility Owned Lands are also within the service area.
'!. Inventory of Existing Facilities
With the exception of a few more recent developments, the existing drainage system within
the City can be characterized as a conveyance system of surface drainage swales and a
series of pipes which collect and route drainage away from homes and businesses as shown
Exhibit 4-1.
The City has a storm drainage system with partial sewage separation, or a combined sewer
system. Because the City's storm drainage system is inte(~ral to its sewer system in areas.
work on one system may effect the other. The City is aoaressivelv pursuing a oroaram tn
reduce combined sewer stormwater from the sewer system or improvino oumoin~
transmission and treatment capabilities for stormwater at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The maiodtv of this work is shown in the Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO~ reduction Plarl
and the sanitary sewer system planning documents, The City's adopted Combined Sewer
Overflow (CSO) Reduction Plan will s~pcr=t~
...............................
~ limit CSOs to no more than one per year per outfall.
A number of natural drainage facilities exist in the Bremerton drainage system. These
natural systems include swales, channels, creeks, ravines, and natural drainage ways that
discharge directly to madne waters. The City is responsible for maintaining three detention
facilities. These facilities are located near Loxie Eagans Blvd. & Arsenal Way, Oyster Bay
Avenue 8, Loxie Eagans, and Ridgetop Circle & Monticola Drive (Holly Terrace West
Addition). In addition: the City will accept responsibility, for maintenance of the Vortechnic,~
Filter (swid filter~ in the ferry terminal ~arkino lot constructed as part of the Bremerton
Trans[~ortation Center project in late 1999. This filter serves the Pacific Avenue basin. In
1999 the City initiated a Droeram of annual inspections of private and City stormwater
detention facilities, The City's stormwater conveyance system consists of approximately 52
miles of pipes ranging for 8" to ~ 154" in diameter. An estimated 60% 45% of the sanitary
sewer system is composed of combined sewers which carry sanitary and stormwater flows.
Bremerton currently has 14 developed drainage basins. The basins include those areas
outside of the City limits that drain into the City and contribute runoff to some of the City's
localized drainage problems. The City's stormwater basin area is approximately 8,564 acres
feet. The majodty of undeveloped Utility Owned Land is not included in this inventory. (Table
SW-~)
DRAFT CFP 1 12/23/99
Stormwater
1. Anderson Avenue N. shores of W. Brem. - Port Wn. Narrows 400
2. Callow Avenue Central W. Brem. - Sinclair Inlet 650
3. Cherry Avenue E. Brem. NE of Warren Ave. Bddge - Port Wn. Narrows 250
4. East Park E. Brem. S of Sylvan Way - Port Wn. Narrows 330
5. Kitsap Lake W. Brem surrounding Kitsap Lake - Chico Bay 1,550
6. Oyster Bay NW part of W. Brem - Oyster Bay & Ostdch Bay 1,575
7. Pacific Avenue SE part of W. Brem incl. Ferry Terminal - Sinclair Inlet 150
8. Phinney Bay N central part of W. Brem - Phinney Bay 225
9. Pine Road W part of E. Brem. ~ Port Wn. Narrows 680
10. Sinclair Park SW portion of W. Brem- 1,400
11. Stevens Canyon E. Brem. in vicinity of Wheaton/Sylvan - Port Wn. 350
Narrows
12. Tracyton Beach Along W. edge of city limits in E. Brem - Port Wn. 60
Narrows
13. Trenton Avenue E part of E. Brem - Port Wn. Narrows & Port Orchard Bay 670
14. Warren Avenue Downtown Bremerton - Port Wn. Narrows 275
Total = 8,565
Source: City of Bremerton Draft Stormwater Management Plan.
2. Forecast of Future Needs
a. Existing Demand
Water Quality -- The City of Bremerton established a policy requiring detention
facilities on development projects in 1980. The guidelines for sizing these facilities
limited the runoff rate to 0.2 CFS/acre based on a 25-year storm event. Since 1994,
the City has required all development to meet the requirements of the "Stormwater
Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin.
Conveyance -- A complete analysis has not been performed on the City's existing
storm drainage system to determine the capacity of the components. This analys~s
will be conducted over the next five years as part of the proposed drainage basin
assessments.
DRAFT CFP 2 12/23/99
Stormwater
b. Level of Service (LOS)
Water Quality -- Development projects must meet the requirements of the
"Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin", "or other technically
equivalent manual adopted by the City of Bremerton, which includes providing water
quality enhancement for 6-month, 24--hour storm and stream bank erosion control by
releasing one-half of the predeveloped 2-yead24-hour duration rate dudng a 2-
yead24-hour duration event, and matching predeveloped 10-year and 100-yead24
-hour duration runoff rates. Construction sites are also required to provide erosion
and sedimentation controls for up to the 2-year storm event. The City anticipates
adopting all or most of the Kitsao County Stormwater Manual f. asa technically
equivalent manual) in late 1999= or eady 2000. This will allow the City to meet the
Department of Ecoloav requirements while providin(~ consistency within the County.
Conveyance -- Storm systems constructed as part of the City's CSO Reduction Plan
will be designed to handle a 25-year storm. The City will be conducting drainage
basin assessments as part of the storm water program. These assessments will
include the identification of storm drainage conveyance system capacities. Based
on the outcome of these assessments, a recommended level of service will be
determined for existing systems. The drainage problems identified in the storm water
capital program are based on conditions observed in the field and represent
conveyance problems that occur annually.
c. Future Demand
Water Quality -- Development will be required to meet the Level of Service
requirements defined above. Regional water quality facilities maybe identified in
future drainage basin assessments.
Conveyance -- The impact of additional impervious surfaces from development on
the conveyance system will be mitigated by the limitations to the runoff rate to
0.2CFS/acre based on a 25-year storm.
d. Need for Capital Facility Improvements
The City's CSO Reduction Plan identifies construction of separate stormwater
conveyance systems in the majodty of the City's drainage basins. These
improvements will address most of the drainage problems identified. The City's
Stormwater Management Plan identified three capital projects, not included in the
CSO Reduction Plan, necessary to improve conveyance system capacity. These
stormwater mana<~ement plan also identified areas for further ana .l~sis that may result
in additional future projects, as will discovery of new problem areas.
e. Plans of Other Providers
The City and Kitsap County share responsibility for a number of drainage basins.
The water quality standards of the City and Kitsap County are consistent.
Coordination between the City and Kitsap County will required regarding the
downstream conveyance systems within these basins.
f. Separation of Private Storm Connections to Sewer System
DRAFT CFP 3 12/23/99
Stormwater
In many areas roof; driveway, basement, foundation and parkin<~ lot drains am,
directly connected to the sanitary, or combined sewer system. This contributes tn
CSO events. In order to meet the CSO Reduction Program reouirements, the City
will initiate a program to seoarate these connections from the sewer system so they
are routed to a stormwater on.ly conveyance facility_ or infiltration area. The City will
be workin_a to adopt an ordinance in late 1999 or ead.v 2000: to encourage orooerW
owners to disconnect their pdvate storm connections from the sewer system., and
allow provisions for City assistance ir~ that effort,
a_. Endanoered Species Act and NPDES II Considerations
In 1999: several salmon species were added to the Endanaered Soecies listinos as
a threatened or endanoered soecies. In addition: NPDES III will require Bremertor~
to get a Stormwater Discharoe Permit. With these issues it is anticipated that water
quality, standards will become more stdna_ent. This ma.v require modification~ to the
ordinances and practices of the City when the new standards are known.
3. Proposed Facilities Improvements
The Stormwater Plan identifies eleven existing flooding problems and recommends
solutions to alleviate these problems. Many of these drainage problems will be reduced
or eliminated by CSO sewer separation projects. A few will be addressed dudng annual
maintenance. Because of the need to meet the PSA Consent Decree and Ecolo(~v Order
on Consent re(~arding combined sewer overflow reductions, stormwater capital fundino is
allocated to those projects, which meet those needs. Projects that address stormwater
issues only are bein~ deferred unless other factors ('such as flood damage to properS, or
grant funding opportunities) provide sufficient justification to address a specific issue.
Sinclair Park Upgrade piping and detention at Kean and Rogers St. 1,000,000
ClP ~ Stevens Piping improvements at Robin and Dibb Streets 180,000
Canyon 170,000
CIP ~3 Pacific Piping improvements along Park Avenue, 5th St to 290,000
Avenue Bu~ell .......
Total = 1,470,000
Source: Dra~ Stormwater Management Plan
The Stormwater Plan identifies a number of small capital projects that need to be performed on
an annual basis. The Plan recommends that the City needs to implement a series of storm
drainage improvements over a multi-year planning pedod, and develop an effective City-wide
DRAFT CFP 4 12/23/99
Stormwater
inspection and maintenance program. {:?aA~,SW-~ Further. the City needs to develoo a model
and oerforTn a detailed analysis of the storm drainage system in several basins. This effort
should identify additional future [~roiects. A detailed listin(3 of the pro.iects anticipated to bc
developed in the next six .years is shown in the attached Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
4. Six-Year Financial Plan
The six-year financial plan for stormwater facilities is included in Section K.
CFP Stormw ter 1998.doc
DRAFT CFP 5 12/23/99
I. Transportation
This section is a summary of information contained in the Transportation Element of the
Comprehensive Plan.
1. Inventory of Existin,q Facilities
Bremerton's transportation system generally consists of streets, highways, sidewalks,
ferries, and public transit· The Transportation Element includes the following information
on existing facilities:
Streets and Hic, lhways
· Principal Arterials (See Transportation Element Table
· Minor Arterials (See Transportation Element Table
· Collector Arterials (See Transportation Element Table
· Residential Streets /Not inventoried)
Mass Transit
· Kitsap Transit /See Transportation Element pg. 20)
. Washington State Ferries: Bremerton- (See Transportation Element pg. 20)
Seattle
· Hoduck Transportation Co.: Bremerton-Port (See Transportation Element pg. 20)
Orchard
Source: Transportation Element "F"
2. Forecast of Future Needs -- Level of Service (LOS) Standard
Levels of Service (LOS) is an estimate of the quality and performance of transportation
facility operations in a community· The Transportation Element measures LOS by
calculating the volume to capacity ratio (V/C) of the midblock of a roadway, using a range
from A (free flow) to F (stop-and-go traffic).
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 1 12/23/99
Transportation
(a) Current Level of Service
The following existing roadway sections exceed or are close to exceeding a Level
of Service D (Volume/Capacity Ratio .90) threshold during the PM peak hour:
B u,"';:c!! We,~-~te44av~ 0.77 D
Burwell Street Warren to Naval 0.77 D
Cambrian Avenue Preble to Farragut 0.73 C
Kitsap Way Callow to SR3 0.87 D
Manette Bridge 0.89 D
Warren/~venue 11th to Bddge 0.80 D
Warren 0Nheaton) Bridge to Callahan Ddve 0.99 E
Source: 1999 Field Measurements by Engineering Division
(b) Recommended Level of Service (LOS)
The Transportation Element establishes the following level of service standards:
· Wheaton/Warren Corridor-- LOS F with V/C threshold of 1.06
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 2 12/23/99
Transportation
· Kitsap Way Corridor -- LOS E or better (VIC less than or equal to 1.00
· Manette Bridge -- LOS E or better (V/C less than or equal to 1.00)
· All Other Arterial Streets -- LOS D or better (vic less than or equal to 0.9)
(c) Existin,q and Anticipated Deficiencies
Existing transportation deficiencies that have been identified from the level of service
standards, as well as operational safety and other improvements include SR304 (Cambrian
Avenue, Farragut Street, Callow Avenue, Bur'well Street and the ferry terminal area); SR303
(Warren Avenue and Wheaton Way); SR310 (Kitsap Way); the Manette Bridge; the Sheridan
Road, Sylavan Way and Riddell Road approaches to Wheaton Way; the Wemer road area from
Union Avenue to SR3; a southbound off-ramp from the Warren Avenue Bridge to Callahan Ddve
and other miscellaneous channelization or traffic control improvements as warranted. Source:
1995 Bremerton Transportation Element.
Subsequent to prepartion of the 1995 Transportation Element, additional deficiencies are
anticipated to develop or become more problematic:
1. Arsenal Way/Patton Avenue from Lafayette Avenue to Loxie Eagans
Boulevard - with improved connections from the Farragut Avenue intersection
on SR304 to Rogers Street and Lafayette Avenue (part of the SR304
Transportation Improvement Project), an increased level of traffic is
anticipated to use this access to the neighborhoods and SR3. This in
combination with the existing land uses in the area (especially the schools
adjacent to the corridor) and the potential for development in the area, an
evaluation and project development of this corridor is appropriate.
2. Auto Center Way widening, Bruen Avenue to SR3 southbound on-ramp - this
will extend a second southbound lane from Bruen Avenue to the SR3
southbound on-ramp to facilitate merging movements of Auto Center Way
traffic from the Kitsap Way turn and turn lane storage from southbound SR3
on-ramp traffic.
3. State Street pedestrian concerns regarding Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
personnel using the State Street gate and crossing Burwell Street at State
Street have increased. City staff will evaluate this location for signal warrants.
4. Traffic calming measures - the City has initiated a program of providing traffic
calming devices (speed humps, traffic circles, bulb outs, chicanes, etc.)
throughout the city. To date this has been largely funded through CDBG
funds, limiting its application to Iow income eligible areas. Expansion of this
program throughout the city, as wee as use of other traffic calming devices
(such as a radar speed trailer) are desirable.
5. Non-motorized improvements - non-motorized improvements are envisioned
to by projects which facilitate pedestrian or bicycle access through the city.
These include completion of the Burwell Hill Climb project (from Callow
Avenue to Forrest Ridge Park) and other pedestrian access routes (such as
6~h Street from Cambdan Avenue to Meade Avenue, and 19th Street off of
Wycoff Avenue). Other program needs include continuation of the Amedcan
With Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Cut Program, coordination with the County's
Bike Ways Program and improvements to the City's bike system.
6. Preservation and miscellaneous - provide for funding of projects which
improve the safety, operations, preservation and TDM aspects of the City
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 3 12/23/99
Transportation
artedal system. This may also include support of street operations on the
local and collector system, as well as other non-routine issues that may arise.
3. Proposed System Improvements
1. SR303 (Warren Avenue/Wheaton Way) - the City has allocated $200,000 of
its county wide TEA-21 funding to the Washington State Department of
Transportation to perform a Major Investment Study of this corddor from
Burwell Street to SR3. This study will focus on existing and anticipated
deficiencies, land use impacts and development of a plan that can provide
guidance for development in the corridor, as well as projects to improve and
maintain capacity of the corridor.
2. SR304 (Cambrian Avenue, Farragut Street, Callow Avenue, Burwell Street
and the ferry terminal area) - In 1999 the City was successful in secudng
approximately 15 million dollars in federal and state grants, for a total project
fund (including asked development and construction costs) of approximately
39 million dollars. It is anticipated this funding will be sufficient to complete
the SR304 portion of the project for which the City is responsible.
Uncertainties in the effects of the salmon listings in accordance with ESA and
actual right-of-way costs may modify the total construction estimate. The City
is going forward with design and construction in 2000-2001, the Navy Yard
Highway phase anticipated in 2001-2002, and the ferry terminal area
improvements in coordination with the Bremerton Transportation Center
project and anticipated redevelopment of that area.
3. SR310 (Kitsap Way) - improvements to Kitsap Way in the vicinity of St3 were
completed in 1999. No further improvements are anticipated until the level of
service or operational problems occur.
4. Manette Bddge replacement - the City and State concluded a public
evaluation of alternatives for the Manette Bddge replacements. The Manette
Bridge will be placed south of its existing structure with connections at the
existing termini. No additional right-of-way is anticipated. The State is
expected to fund construction of the bddge in the 2001-2003 biennium.
5. Widening of Sheddan Road, Sylvan Way and Riddell Road at their approaches
to Wheaton Way - widening is not forecasted to started within the next six
years. The City will continue to monitor these intersections for degradation of
the level of service. These intersections will be included in the SR303
Corridor Study.
6. Wemer Road area improvements - the City has been successful in receiving
grants from the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) and the Federal
Economic Development Administration (for stormwater improvements) and
county wide TEA funds, as well as developer and property owner contributions
for construction of improvements in this area. It is anticipated that
construction will occur in 2000.
7. Warren Avenue southbound off-ramp to Callahan Ddve - this project lost the
old Federal Aide Urban (FAU) funding which had been allocated to it. The
funding was insufficient to complete the project. This project does not
compete well for grants under the current cdteria for transportation funding.
City staff will continue to pursue grant opportunities for this project and will
include it in the SR303 Corddor Study.
8. Arsenal Way/Patton Avenue (from Lafayette Avenue to Loxie Eagans
Boulevard) - the City is preparing to make grant applications for this project.
Construction of this project is dependent upon receipt of grant funding.
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 4 12/23/99
Transportation
9. Auto Center Way widening (Bruen Avenue to SR3 southbound off-ramp) - the
City is developing a conceptual plan for this improvement and anticipates
making grant application funding for this work. Improvements will not occur
without grant funding.
10. Preservation - as the City street network deteriorates, preservation
improvements are becoming more necessanj. A mixture of local and state
funds will be pursued to maximize preservation of the existing system.
11. Non-motorized, traffic calming and miscellaneous improvements - these
improvements will be funded to the extent possible with City or outside
funding.
Detailed listings of the anticipated capital projects to be developed in the next six years
are shown in the attached Capital Improvement Program sheets.
4. Six-year Financial Plan
The six-year financial plan for transportation facilities is included in Section J of this
Capital Facilities Program.
CFP Transportation 1998.doc
DRAFT Capital Facilities Program 5 12/23/99
J. Water
The City of Bremerton Water Utility provides potable water for Bremerton and the surrounding
area. A complete inventor~, analysis of need, and capital facilities program is provided in the
1992 City of Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan (also known as the Bremerton Water
Plan) adopted by the Washington State Department of Health in 1993 and the Bremerton City
Council in 1994. T~. .... *, ,,-,~.-*,- .-.~ *~... ~ .... ,-*.... ~^~-.*,.. C...,. ; ...... ;...~ ~.,. ~ OOO Uodate fOF
the Water System Comprehensive Plan is currently underway and will be completed by the end
of 1999.
1. Inventory of Existinq Facilities
(a) Service Area
The Utility services approximately 58,000 residents in Bremerton (38,000) and
portions of Kitsap County (20,000), including the Gorst area and the western
portion of the Manette Peninsula. The service area includes the Olympic View
Industrial Park and the Bremerton National Airport. The Utility e~e-is-u,~,e~ has
contracted to provide water with ooerations and maintenance services to the
Tracyton and Rocky Point Water Districts. In addition, the Utility contracts to
supply water to the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS) and to the City of Port
Orchard.
The current service area includes approximately 5,300 acres within the Bremerton
City limits, and approximately 6,800 acres within unincorporated Kitsap County.
(See Figure CF-8 "Bremerton Water Plan Service Map".) The Kitsap County
Coordinated Water System Plan contains an Intedocal Agreement for Establishing
Water Utility Service Area Boundaries, and in addition, the City has service area
agreements with North Perry, Silverdale, Sunnyslope, Rocky Point, and Tracyton
water districts.
In 1999= the Cit.v and the Port of Bremerton entered into an agreement to have the
City own and operate the Port water system,
(b) Facilities/Water Riqhts
The City of Bremerton Water Utility supply system consists of Union River
Reservoir behind the Casad Dam, 12 production wells, 204 miles of water pipe,
fourteen pressure reducing stations, 16 water storage reservoirs, and 14 pump
and booster stations. (Table WA-l) Approximately C~ 65 percent of the supply
comes from the 2,764 acre Union River watershed, which is 98 percent owned
and controlled by the City. Wells in several local aquifers supply groundwater to
the system. Current average daily demand is approximately 8 million gallons per
day (MGD).
There are six pressure zones in the system: East (E) 240, E 398 E 490, West (W)
256, W 440, and W 517. These zones are designated by the overflow elevations
in Utility reservoirs. Two additional pressure zones (W540 and 650) are currently
being designed. Construction on the W650 zone is scheduled to begin in -1-989
2000, with the W540 zone scheduled to begin in 2001. Both zones include pump
DRAFT CFP 1 12/23/99
stations and reservoirs.
Bremerton's water supplies consist of 10,689 pdmary acre-feet (1,408
supplementary acre-feet) of groundwater and a firm yield from the Union River of
3.8 MGD. Instantaneous dghts include 40 cubic feet per second (cfs) (17,952
gallons per minute-gpm) on the Union River watershed and 6350 gpm
groundwater. All water in use by the City has been propedy appropriated through
certificates of water dghts or claims. Historically-used surface water claims are
maintained for potential emergency and future use pending required treatment.
Bremerton's Union River surface source is of such excellent quality that the City is
currently approved by the State Department of Health to remain unfiltered.
Sources are disinfected with chlorine. The water system control and alarm is
provided through a telemetry system. Updates'to the telemetry system are
planned for 1997-99, including conversion to radio telemetry. Operation staff are
state certified, and the system is operated in compliance with all federal and state
regulations. (Table WA-l)
For compliance with the EPA Lead and Couper rule: the City has constructed a
Corrosion Control Facility that injects caustic soda (NaOH) into the water entednn
the water system at Reservoir No.4. This facilitv beaan operation in March of
1999. Fluoridation of the water system was considered as part of this project., but
by a vote of the people: was not implemented,
used ct the four wa!! sites.
(c) Fire Flows
The Utility is generally capable of meeting Kitsap County Ordinance fire flows,
which are considered to be minimums for new const~ction. However the
Bmmedon Water Plan recommends that fire flows be designed to meet the
significantly higher Insurance Se~ices (ISO) Standards. Under peak houdy flow
conditions, a minimum of 30 psi (new mains) residual system pressure without fire
flows in water mains should be maintained to meet State Depadment of Health
standards.
(d) Capaci~
The current capacity of the water system on an annual average is 12 million
gallons per day (MGD). The daily capacity of the system with groundwater
sources only is 8.7, while the capacity with groundwater and su~ace sources at
current hydraulic capability is 21.5 MGD.
DRAFT CFP 2 12/23/99
Water
The capacity vades because the Union River is used to supply the average day
demands of the system. The surface supply can be vaded between zero and 15.5
MGD as long as annual average firm yield of 3.8 MGD and water quality limits are
not exceeded. Note that not all sources can be used to maximum capacity at the
same time, due to limited hydraulic capacity of the Unior~ River transmission
mains or water dght conditions.
DRAFT CFP 3 12/23/99
Water
Union River Watershed 15.5
Surface Water Subtotal = 15.50
1. ~r2-R - Anderson Creek Well 2380 Anderson Hill Rd SW 800
2. #3 - Anderson Creek Well 2380 Anderson Hill Rd SW 400
3. #7 - Anderson Creek Well 2731 State Highway 16 450
4. #8 - Anderson Creek Well 2651 State Highway 16 650
5. ~9 - Bridle Ridge Well 318 NW Firway Lane 230
6. #13 - Vena Well 50 NE Vena Avenue 600
7. #14 - East Zone 240 Well 5853 Central Valley Road NE 270
8. #15 - Pistol Range Well 6581 W. Old Belfair Highway 150
9. #17 - Pistol Range Well 6581 W. Old Belfair Highway 760
10. #18- Twin Lakes Well 8301 W. Old Belfair Highway 370
11. #19 - Golf Course Well 7061 W. Old Belfair Highway 300
12. ~r20 - Twin Lakes Well 8301 W. Old Belfair Highway 1,100
13. ~r21 - Silverdale Mobile Home Estates 903 NE Saturn Lane (500)
Well (pending application) Estimated Future production =
14. Gorst Well (pending application) Old Belfair Highway (400)
Estimated Future production =
Current Groundwater Sub-Total (gpm) = 6,080.00
Current Groundwater Sub-Total (MGD) = 8.70
15. PS #1 - Gorst Creek (emergency supply Belfair Valley Road - Gorst Creek N/A
only)
16. PS #2 - Anderson Creek 2380 Anderson Hill Road 2,250
17. PS #3 (emergency use only) 7061 Belfair Valley Road 400
18. PS #4 1335 Jones St. O/Vest Brem.) 800
19. PS #11 844 Callahan Drive 1,400
20. PS #12 3029 Olympus Drive 950
DRAFT CFP 4 12/23/99
Water
21. PS #13 2929 Olympus Ddve 500
22. PS #14 2101 Schley Blvd 825
23. PS #16 50 NE Vena Ave 1,250
24. PS #17 Old Belfair Hwy 1,500
Pump Station Sub-Total = 9,875
..................... \ ...... i,, .... II ...................
25. Warner Booster Station ~ 5881 Warner 50
26. Booster Station #3 3000 17th Street 300
28. Booster Station 05 589 Lobe Blvd ~ nn
29. Ha~horne Booster Station ~ 4490 Ha~horne Ave West 120
30. Booster Station ~7 1527 Cook Rd SW 60
Booster Station ~10 5785 Imoedal Way SW 3.695
Booster Pump Stations SubTotal ~ ! ,~30
Pump Stations Total = 1_.. ~_ ,~ ~ nn~ ~,,.~.cn~
29, Union River Rese~oir (behind Casad Union River Watemhed 1,350
Dam)
31. Res. ~2 McKenna Falls Head Tank 0.1
Rese~oirs (Raw ~ate0 Total = 1,350.10
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: ::::::.::~ ::: :~:: ::::::~: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~: :~: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~:~:~: :: ::
34. Rese~oir ~ 4801 Roosevelt elvd ~ ~ .0
35. Rese~oir ~5 (~) 3~00 First Street (Forest Ridge 3.0
Park:)
36. Rese~oir ~ 5144 Francis Street ~ Eden Road 0.15
DRAFT CFP 5 12/23/99
Water
37. Reservoir #8 7300 Werner Road 2.54
38. Reservoir #10 (2 Tanks) 5785 Imperial Way SW, Pt. 0.21
Orchard - Port of Brem. Industrial
Park
39. Reservoir #11 844 Callahan Ddve 1.58
40. Reservoir #12 3029 Olympus Ddve 2.0
41. Reservoir #13 2929 Olympus Ddve 0.80
42. Reservoir #14 1628 Hayward Avenue ~ E. 17th 2.0
43. Reservoir #15 1925 Cheryl Street ~ Forest Drive 1.0
44. Reservoir #16 260 Sugarpine - Tracyton 1.0
Watershed
45. Reservoir #17 400 Ridge Lane NE @ Sandra 1.0
Lane
46. Reservoir #18 1925 NE Cheryl Street ~ Forest 1.0
Dr.
47. Reservoir #19 I 2628 Ash Street ~ Cherry Ave 2.0
48. Reservoir #20 400 Ridge Lane NE @ Sandra 1.0
Lane
49. Reservoir ~r21 2132 Lakehurst Drive - NAD Park 3.0
~istdbution Reservoir Total = 33.2~
12"- 36" Water Mains Vadous 20-1-¢48
Transmission Main Piping =
2" - 12" Water Mains Vadous 1,211,729
45.781
10" Water Mains Various
8" Water Mains Various 3~7,~!~
7" Water Mains Vadous 703
6" Water Mains Various 4! !
114.378
4" Water Mains Various
3" Water Mains Vadous
16.658
2" Water Mains Various
DRAFT CFP 6 12/23/99
Water
Distribution Piping System Sub-Total = ~
Total Piping System = ~., ,~o, ,-,~.~?'~, .-~nn
2. Forecast of Future Needs
(a) Existinq Demand
The average daily water system demand vades depending on weather conditions,
but averages about 8.1 8.2 million gallons per day (MGD).
Yeast Average Day Demand (MGD)
1990 9.35
1991 8.71
1992 8.48
1993 7.73
1994 8.29
1995 7.89
1996 7.43
1997 7.42 7.67
1998 8.20
Approximately 33 percent of the average daily demand comes from the Puget
Sound Naval Shipyard, the largest single water user. Approximately 78 percent of
the water demand is "in-City" demand, and 22 percent is outside the city limits.
Average day demand is affected by the year's rain patterns and other factors -- for
example, 1993 was a wet summer, resulting in less outside water use. However,
the highest peak day ever recorded was dudng unusually Iow temperatures in
December 1990 when pipes broke and customers ran water to prevent pipes from
freezing. In 1992, Seattle's drought response media campaign affected
Bremerton customers' water use, even though our reservoir was not experiencing
a drought.
(b) Level of Service (LOS} Standard
........ ,~,.,, ~,,, ~, ...... ,~nn ,,, ~r~n ~_~,'-~ Domestic unit demands are then
expected to remain constant through the year 2014.
· 1990 LOS = 106 gallons per capita per day (GPCD)
100
· Current LOS = 103 GPCD
_. o ....... '~-"~ LOS -
DRAFT CFP 7 12/23/99
Water
(c) Future Demand
The 1992 Bremerton Water Plan identifies needs for a 20 year planning period
from 1990 to 2010. During that time it is expected that supply capacity to meet
typical maximum day demands (MDD) will increase 26.99 mgd by year 20'10.
(Table WA-2)
The 1999 Update to the Water System Comprehensive Plan will update the Water
System Plan demand projections.
Existing Sources 9.1 -23.7 13,460- 16,565
Potential Sources 11.0 - 12.2 7,470
Total Sources 20.1 - 35.9 20,930 - 24,035
Source: Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan Table 8-7
The 1992 Water System Plan kt-is projects that if pending water dghts certificates
are secured, then no additional sources will be needed to meet the total demand
through the next six years. However, future water sources will need to be secured
to meet anticipated demands beyond year 2000. (Table WA-3)
I 1994 * 56,701 9.04
1995-2000 (new) 9,686 4.20
Total as of 2000 * 66,387 13.24
2000-2012 11,764 4.38
Total as of 2012 78,151 12.17
Sources: Bremerton Water System Comprehensive Plan, updated by Bremerton Water Utility
· 1994 & 2000 demand -from Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan, December 23, 1996
Assumptions: 2000: Pop. X 103 gallons/capita + 3.2 MG for PSNS
2014: Pop. X 100 gallons/capita + 3.2 MG for PSNS
DRAFT CFP 8 17_J23/99
.Water
3. Proposed Facility Improvements
The Bremerton Water Plan recommends that =,'*, =ddltlc,-,=! 0.7 mgd of g, v.nd ......
~-~.~.,j ............... ~...~ by ........ a total of 1.4 mgd should be developed by year
2000. (Table WA-2) The City has two =dditi=,-,=l wells ddlled and awaiting water dghts.
Current regulatory and legal uncertainty at the State level precludes processing of water
dghts applications except under emergency conditions.
The Water Plan concludes that existing distribution system is capable of meeting typical
system demands. Improvements in transmission and distribution mains are necessary to
improve flows and pressures in certain areas and to replace undersized or sub-standard
facilities.
(a) Water Qualify
Meeting strict Federal and State water quality standards is a primary objective of
the City. Ddnking water is regularly tested at the sources and in the distribution
system.
To continue to use the unfiltered Union River source, the City should continue to
pursue either acquisition or controlling agreements over remaining pdvate lands
within the watershed, and should vigorously implement the Watershed Control
Plan. Responsible operation of the entire water system is critical to maintaining
compliance with the non-filtration status of the surface water treatment
regulations. Even with these precautions, a drastic change in source quality or
changes in regulations could require the City to provide filtration further treatment
such as ozonation or filtration. The City has reviewed and evaluated potential
water treatment plant sites in the City's system. A site has been located near
Reservoir No. 4 on Washington State Military Department property. The City has
begun discussions with the State Military Department regarding acquisition of the
property.
Groundwater wells water quality will be ensured through a Wellhead Protection
Program, implemented in 1996.
(b) StoraRe
Storage needs include the E398 zone and the Industrial Park and Airport area, no
additional storage is needed to meet current demand. By year 2010 a total of
22.5 million gallons (MG) of system wide storage is expected to be required. The
system currently has 34,3 MG of storage available, pdmadly in the lower elevation
zones in the developed parts of the city. In 1996 the City formally took over the
Port of Bremerton Reservoir.
Two additional pressure zones (W540, and 650) are currently being designed.
Construction on the W650 zone is scheduled to begin in 1999, with the W540
zone scheduled to begin in 2001. Both zones include pump stations and
reservoirs.
Prior to year 2010, additional storage will be required north of the East Bremerton
city limits.
DRAFT CFP 9 12/23/99
Water
(c) Distribution System
West Bremerton industrial/commercial areas have good fire flow capacity.
Toward Jackson Park, fire flow capacity meets Kitsap County guidelines but is
less than ISO recommendations for multi-family residential housing. Several
improvements are needed to improve fire flow capacity in the East 398 Zone, west
of the Brownsville Highway. Pump station capacity will need to be added to serve
new west zones south of Kitsap Lake and south of Gorst. The Utility should
continue to routinely replace small sub-standard water mains. Initial replacement
projects should concentrate on mitigating Iow-pressure problems in the Sherman
Heights area. The existing telemetry and control system will require upgrading
and maintenance so the Utility continue to improve control the water system.
(d) Plans of Other Providers
There are no other providers of potable water within the City. However, there are
several nearby water districts, public utility districts and municipalities that may
have interests in local surface and groundwater resources. These include:
Silverdale Water District No. 16; North Perry Avenue Water District; Erland Point
Water District; Sunnyslope Water Distdct and City of Port Orchard Water District.
.......... Unclaimed service
areas also exist south, east and west of the Utility's watershed.
The Kitsap County Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), a regional water
supply, transmission, and storage plan, was developed by the Water Utility
Coordinating Committee (WUCC) to comply with state law. The plan assesses
water supply needs in Kitsap County and presents a program to provide water
supply and service to users. The plan provides a process and strategy for
existing water utilities to define their role in a program consistent with adopted
land use policies and projected growth strategy. The Water Utility Coordinatino
Council has be(~un to City :-' ~'~-'~,'""'--' +-' plo,-, ~'-- +~'~ update te the CWSP.
re) Seismic Improvements
A Water System Earthquake Vulnerabilit.v Assessment was com[~leted in March
1997, which looked at the system vulnerabili~ due to seismic events. The study
recommended several improvements to the storage reservoirs., pump stations.
transmission mains and the Oasad Dam intake structure. Implementation of these
improvements will be done on a programmatic nature with a funding allowance on
an annual basis.
A detailed listing of the or¢jeCs anticipated to be developed in the next six years is shown
in the attached Capital Im______provement Plan sheets.
4. Six-Year Financial Plan
Under the proposed LOS it is projected that no additional water sources will be needed to meet
the total demand through the next six years, providing water fights are secured on two wells
which have already been ddlled.
The City pays for capital facilities through charges for service, but also through Timber Sales and
DRAFT CFP 10 12/23/99
Water
other non-revenue receipts. The six-year financial plan for water facilities is included in Section 3
of this Capital Facilities Program.
CFP Water 1998.doc
DRAFT CFP 1 1 12/23/99