HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/01/22 ~ebru~ry 1. 1922.
Regular meeting of City Commission held on ~ednesday.~ebruary 1, 1922 with
0ommlesioner B~fffington in the chair as Mayor protem, and 0ommissioner Harrisemu
present at roll call.
~inutes of previous session rea~ ~d approved as rea~.
Attorney Stevenson addresee~ the Oc~iaslcn ~ submitte~ application Per
license of . ~'~tsui and F. E. L. ~cn to ~perate dance at 50~ 2ark Aven~e; lai~
over until next roger meeting. ~
~cmmunicati&n rea~ fro~ Star ~chinery Company advis~g that the contractors on
L. I. D. ~10J owe them $87~.4~ ~ requestin~ the City to withheld this amount
from Contractor's estimate. ~otion by Harrison~ seceded b~ B~fington, that
0ity Clerk be instr~te~ to not~y ~tar Machinery omp~y thati~ er~er t~ protect
their claim it woul~ be necessary for them to file a formal lien; carried ~imcus-
ly on roll c~ll.
Oo~unica~ion read fro~ Helen Durgin, Chas. D. Durgin, and ~s. Brown ac~owledg-
lng th~ expression of s~pathy of the City Oo~issioners in their recent bereave~ent~
Motion by Harrison, secon~e~ by Burlington, that co~unication be placed on file;
carried uu~imously en roll call.
Oo~ication read from City Engineer submitting Estimate ~S of James Brothers.
contractors ~der L.I.D. ~lO~, showing amount due this date t0 be $~1~8.80. h~otion
~y Buffl~gton, seconded by Harrison t~t estimate be approved and warrant dra~ on
L.I.D. ~lOJ for the amount of tB16B.80; carried ~imouely on roll e~l.
C~unication read from property o~ers In East Bremert~n petitic~A~ for a
hearin~ on the vacation of alleys in East Bremerton; petition referred ~te Oe~iss-
ioner Harrison for investigation.
Ordinate ~756 read, bei~ an Ordinance amending Section 2 of Ordinance ~730 with
reference to re-assessmen~ of L.I.D. ~62. Mo~ion by ~fington, seco~ed,by
Harrison, tha~ Ordinance ~756 be passed as read; carried un~imeusly on roll call.
Oo~nissioner Harrison reported t~t he had investigated the proposed installation
of fire hydr~ts ~d reco~ended that hydrators be installed at ~ifth and ~acific
and at ~ifth and Park ~d tha~ the proposed installation a~ Sixth and Pleasant be
further lnvestga~ed as ~o location.
Commissioner Burlington re?erred ~hat he had ~wo ~iles replaced at Wharf ~E at
a cost of ~$~0.00; a~o tha~ the damages caused by the Argus at'Wharf ~1 had been
satisfactorily repaired.
City ~tterney reported that a Judgment of $500.00 had been given a~ainst the
Oity in the Su~)reme Court in the ~inn case; that the trial on L.I.D. ~99 would come
up for hearing on h~ebruary 6th; tha~ the trial on L.I.D. ~81 w~uld come up for
hearing in ~he Supreme Court on ~,~ebruary 16th; and that the Charleston water suit
wo~ld come u~ for heari~ on the 14th of ~ebruary.
No~ion by Harrison, se$o~ed by B~fington ~ all bills which have been duly
approved oy allowed az~ marr~ts drawn for same; carried unanimously ~n.roll call.
There bei~g no ~rther busine~s to come before the Ge~ission~ the meeting was
duly adjourned.