Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAMPBELL WAY, 1225 .. /2- l- s tlLrn,p beLt ()) cu;r. " \ '.. TYPE , ~ VN .Ph,;, r...AI'~<w", ~ '" BARRY E. COALSON, If.n. ~ at: 1225 Campbell >Tay #201 $~, <1/f~ -0/'.40 Mat:M.,~-"'6e~ -"'M.,~~M., ~ ~ 0/' M., ~ 0/' $~ "" "-u. ~ CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CITY OF BREMERTON BUILDING DEPARTMENT ~~.. TYPE ~ B2 , OCCUPANCY ~ 20 COMMON USE Office ", ;:" "August 18, 1992 A'., -" ~ '. ~~ ~~- $,,~ tt;ir~ David A. Nelson TIlls Certllicale mils/ be PUsled and permaneril/y maln/alnedln aconsp;cuous Place. Bus. Lie. ': ,;' ""<-' ~'~-~~:'.;'- ;-:: ~ ~~l~~~~:;'t{~~~Jt.~"~.~\~t!?~;;~~{.'~'/~~~[JE~~~~~~~, >"':i~~~z~~:~4~~~~t~~~~~t~~ ..~ '.' ,;~:~~": ~. ~ ~ -'~ ~ ..~ ~~:~'~'.: ' JL oJ ,', ",' , ~...~ " . "'.,' ~ ,.'",. " .. _ '-~~" _. "', '_., . "'!.d.:Y" ::,. ";'" J ....,,'~ :.,' "',', '".;'~l~., ';'~:"',f<'~~~~':. :.;.-.! (,~::; :",' .'.' '.' ifl$. '" ',,'. "':1' -' ,.. '''', '. . ., ',,' . " ~ .... .""''''''.' ',>.,. ..~.."I.,~ ''''''.<~fr.>'' -".,>;..,......\\'\-~. ,,""''' ."'.. '. t\~ . ,'. ...t.,~. .' V~ . ......~ .".. ~.. ,~ . ". '~"....H. ] ~...'- ".' ~ ~V~-!' ~..", '. .' ~'",...:. ::... '~.' ( ,i '1',;',- ~ >' v,, '.", '.~ .:;,;, ';r"i~:::"(", -';--.""-"'. "';.~. C''';:'''''''k'..t!~~..'....- ~ -,,~ .... ~ .", ~. CERTIFICATE OFOccOpA~rcv~r,:'. .~-'~ ~ ff~~~tc JEFFREY P. LEAKE M.D. .','" ~ ~ ~~ 1225 CAMPBELL f!lJ~~ ~~ ~.< ~"'/>./I"A~A. dud the ~ ~ ~ uu:th the ~ ~-fl theOJlI:."J~~~ ~.' . ~~r-=-- nury. "r ,,~'7 ~ ~ ~o/the~o/f!lJ~~~~. . .,.~ ~.. TYPE' TYPE OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION OCCUPANCY LOAD COMMON USE VN ..' B-2 MEDICAL OFFICE :,: ..' J) / ."::~T 28, ~;86. ....... ":!~"-...:.'"-.;~: '... ~i . '.' This certificat~ must be posted and permanently maintained in a. CO~SPiC~?Us:Place. '.. ..... ~ ", . ',' ., _ .r. . '. ' . . . .:.' .. Permit No. '.::' , ,',' . :'. ~ .... :- . ',' . .~", .'. ~ ~A :. . . .;. . . ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~. ':; .' ...' '. :, ,.;, .:,.. ~.._.. ..~ " .':','.' ~":. ~o'''', . _~~,~.~~. ,:'~.. ~ _ '. .~}:,:';~~.:.,~. i~'::}:~'~~~:'_" L .~~:!:~~:.~1:>.. :. . ~.: . CITY HALL .. . :J (:) -- ^'~~ A.~~ ./ r~S'~ / c '::'5 ( , 0,> ??r.':-~f' 0 ~o~ ' /' ..' ~ / ." "_'0 'h/~~^"'-'~' "1:. ";,L J.,... .v, /"""" ~~. ~~\ /~.0g~.~ !:.~.^':'o ?~...,,~/..,. 'f'.~~ . () ~).~~ /....~ / /. ~. 1 ~.~.' ~~v~..<::.../'../';. 7 '. . . ,...'.........:.s'> ..!".' ) ,.~~ ~\J ~-~.? 7?oc::",. ?--{?J~ l:Jff;>.tY()~ - _, '. ~"'<'~' "" -'~Y~-'--f ~ ,).t, ,&.;.~.0T/.;~( ~'" .~ g;~~.'.,)j,. r'./ ~l '\j,.'.~..ifl\p../,' ;r"..~: (. /......,~. ~ '7 a::..~. o.~."i/!..(f~. 0~::j.,r,. 'i'~&~~o ~ ~2 ."'..>f\~~"'-.'V.- f-:::J '''; co j'~....~....,:.i,.';.~':...... ~'lf ( ? .aJ!Jii,iI' ) .' - l':li,~ -~;; 0' :,pP . -..'4 ~.. t:;:: ( cQ -~"', ~~,\_ ,,;00 (,,", :",;""" '''';:dl,''''';'(.~,,^ '4",!!:' <"" /'~ -~ t 0'" ,',;../\\ ~ ~ _... TQ~~'" ~~ .~ i D'Of) ~~-y oV'~ ~,;;:~,:",} p ,!.r.- ~-t I+...........~ ------7L-/' t>K'.p-*,j<, _ Q, ~.::~ VV<'~" ':1: 6 'C,_ ':::-.....~r . 0'-"" - ~ v \...,.. ~~ ,'::'-"""'" ";> ~ -4l""'~J' ~ '\\-... ,~""-~ ~~....;;,'"' ~d;'~J1,~~.:' ~WAS~I @)J~t <:;). p" ~~~ $;~~ ~,,~-~;."'~~ " 'i>-,::;,~..___,,,;r---w-fl""'-' ~":.:-"7;\",'~ 2- "" '=- ;"p''''J .,& Of a.._~ ~~. '\. '~,~'"tJ5:' -;::;;>a-tJ,THE O[YM~)cS ~ /,;/ ~-~~a$ ~~.~ ~ .' ~'"<'"'~~:/L~ ^~':S, ~'239~F-.eiJRtH STREEzr/~8.3,1..d:::~:~~'. <:.:::. 6 >7 'J. ~ LJ-r~~io""~" ~..... .--- "'Q "~&: ' e' ~~ ~---~C~_/~~- ~vV'V--~ ~ " T~-,",~,~ ,i1ovg,,,,g r~ MAYOR AND COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING CITY CLERK AND PURCHASING AGENT November 16~ 1981 1225 Campbell Way; BREMERTON CHE8T CLINIC PLAN REVIEW: 1. Hydrant must be installed prior to any construction as per comments of 7/27/81 to Planning Department. 2. Install Firecalarm system as per 1977 Fire Alarm Code; plans to be submitted for approval. 3. Apparent occupant load calls for exit doors to swing in the direction of egress. 4. No door schedule is shown on pZans. 5. Electrical; exit lights~ emergency lighting~ etc? - not shown! 6. Site must be kept clean and a dumster provided. Burning of scrap building materials is prohibited. ~ \~: '1 s"-~.. ~':j~ ~ " d '" ""'::'l!I' ~ ~~ ~.) .~~.,;. '-..1 1. ~~@~~w~@ NOY 1 7 1981 C;;i~Sf Qif Bremerton B 01 ,. UU,iZlt~"l;~ Depar~<!."t~!.'"tt HOME OF THE PUGET SOUND NAVAL BASE AND SHIPYARD . - \~( If: ~~ ~. ij W~ ~ lru i~ OV 0 6 1981 November 6, 1981 -: , ,'f Bram@\j"ton ;~~';~~:~;, ~ Oepar.~;.iM,~:l"bt TO: Building Department FROM: Engineering Department SUBJECT: Plan Review - Bremerton Chest Clinic Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit #56-81 imposed conditions that must be met prior to issuance of a building permit. Some of these have not been fulfilled. 6 (a) Sedimentation control. The plan contains no mention of the measures proposed to control silt and sedimentation. I need to know how the contractor will control the siltation resulting from runoff over the cut slopes and prevent damage to adjacent private property and City streets and deposition of the silt material into Port Washington Narrows. 7 (e) Storm Drain Facilities. Elevations given on the plan of storm drain structures appear to be inconsistent with the intent to drain to the existing catch basin in Campbell Way. I need data to verify that the system will function properly 7 (f) Sanitary Sewer. If the elevation of the sanitary main in Campbell Way is accurate there should be no problem in achieving the required slope on the service line. Field conditions could necessitate the installation of a pump station. The rockery along the northwesterly side of the project appears to be on the adjacent property. If this is a fact an easement must be secured from this property owner. ~ ALLAN L. KANE, P.E. City Engineer ALK:m :i ~I1H11f )/1'1 11 ~ ~~1(J~ "f~ a,-oe- eL/rLr~'a./.. c4tG ~~~ ,~. fib ~!1 .~ ~l F1 .."..- ~ F"""""'; t I ~. t..". 11 1,.\ l',T'1 !;.;:::1 ': j r2 ~'J , : " ': ..~ >..' L t .:"'::1:lL::::""l It e ~ _----~-----------.--------,----4---- BUILDING DEPARTMENT HOUTING FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT Name._ilw-~~_~~ (Jih',"~'J.t:~~";"'Ef Oil) Address .h 2-5 ~-f~~- Sui lder : __ /??2(U~r::.~~ __________._________ OCCUPANCY MUST BE APPHOVED BY THE FOLLOWING DEPAHTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPAHTMENT'S COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS: DEPARTMENT DATE SENT RETUHN DATELINE APPHOVED BY ~ 2- -6=- (Pi 2 -j (5- fly" --------.-. - COMMENTS NQJ.tZCQR....D .~aE_ 130 N 0 I-DR J210.yE&V(iY-__/~:.~~f ~ S~OCU/Au< S'--A~J) ___._______._w________.___._~ -...-.:, ~ " ,"""" H. BrlJ..~ " t -'fl. .-tl/orney 1\1:.,," I\illian . '~I (-Ity Attorney I flt:h Ann Tift . nl (Oily A ((orne)' e u e CITY AT! \J..."_ _ " vfFICE February 16, 1983 Dr. Richard Wesley 1225 Campbell Way Bremerton, WA 98310 Dear Dr. ~'lesley i Please find enclosed an estimate of the costs to build the sidewalk and driveway. Any bond method you prefer would be satisfactory to us. Sincerely, LEIGH ANN TIFT Asst. City Attorney LATitlb enclosure Gateway to the Olympics and Home of the Puget Sound Naml Shipyard - e e BUILDING DEPAnT~,lENT nOUTING FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT 11 ..., j ;-a. -, Q/J') / r y;'. 0 :. ' ,/1 Na.me :__. :;rzt.4~_~&~___!:~<<--G- _ /J-tt/i./L<I~C'" ..I::-bFL~~.~J uL! , - . r- / AddreSSh-~_.:L-~~2- --- - Bu i IdeI' : __-:?2;J:.~_~ __________.__,____ OCCUPANCY MUST BE APPHOVED BY THE FOLLOWING DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT'S COMPLIANCE HEQUIREMENTS: DEPARTMENT DATE SENT RETUHN DATELINE ~ _2 -b~ !?t 2_-:/6-:~ /_ COMMENTS <". e e BUILDING DEPARTMENT ROUTING FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT Name_/J-z~ ~~ Qav~,<t 4r,k-~.qf 4t1) Address: Iz-?-J ~~. . Builder: /??J~__ ____ OCCUPANCY MUST BE APPROVED DY THE FOLLOWING DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEPARTMENT'S COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS: RETURN DATELINE APPROVED BY DEPARTMENT DATE SENT ./1)11 lu~ 2- -6- gt COMMENTS crU"Y OF BREMERTON FEB 7 1984 W-ater Department e e . BUILDING DEPAnT~1ENT HOUTING FOH OCCUPANCY PERMIT f2 ~ /-~ J' Q" :J- ) " ",17 ~; . ...,.. /1'" 1 Name :__-I2:::I.td.-~"- _ /_~f4<<--<- __'j:~~'''' v:" ~~..-<J vi; Addl' e s s : -L-z_?:-_~2- __ a~~__~~,f!:.J--J.-._-----------_.- --;-r- ("\--.~ A /-0 Bu i 1 del' : __:2?;fU~~-~~~_._"------_.__._----------- OCCUPANCY MUST BE APPHOVED BY THE FOLLOWING DEPAHTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEJ5Al1TMENT I S COMPLIANCE HEQUIHEMEN'rS: DEPARTMENT DATE SENT HETURN DATELINE APPHOVED BY ~ 2- -b~ g:;/ COM~IENTS .- ,.<, .. e e . BUILDING DEPARTMENT ROUTING FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT Name :_i~14~/t0- _.~4L~>l~ Addr es s : -Lz_?:__;:,?_L~A2&L'-_0.J @J.. ,T ~. IT '), Bu 1.1 del' : __ ~U~~----_-....:.-. 0, . . .. fG"I '/ ,- /// l) ,-.{:lti/~/L{I ve' >i :~ k-offd:a..d":;<'/t--uJ L? Ufo I OCCUPANCY MUST BE APPHOVED BY THE FOLLOWI1'.;G DEPAHTMENT IN ACCORDANCE 'WITH DEPARTMENT'S COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS: DEPARTMENT DATE SENT HETURN DATELINE APPHOVED BY ,~- y -~-=- (f1- 2 ~/() ~f?LL ------- -- ,2.~hY ~ DEPUTY, FIRE MARSHAL I!temcrton Fire Department COMMENTS .-.---.-----------.......------....-"------- ,..... (,'~. , e . -(0 5l{cr 0/ S bC) L 5 BU I 1.D1 \G ])FP:\nT~,!L~:T HOUT 1 ;;C ro:\ OCCUPANCY P1T:'~1 IT < , , ~ West/!y. . /"1 ~ ~ /- /oN \2.1.... ,,) ... . / , /" ,", " -' . ' ''- ., I . Xa;'le :_/.>Z1.....f'-1/.7-c'..J:.-- _.i:/~~._.._ L~-:k<-<- _ ~,~~,~'L<'~" -i ..l;--'-''j/0r.~ <,,,,,,-U I ULl/ - /,1 ' / :\cldress: / Z 2._j_ _.-L-sJ:2~i-\~!.J2~LL_~0(;J_ T' i 1.1 ,,- . ~,.' V- r' -. - ;----c :JU.,UL. '__~'0.'(14~r),~.,",==-_~~__ OCCUPA~CY UUST HE API'HOVED BY TIrE FOLLOWI!';G DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDA:-:CE 'I'.' ITE Dl:P:\RT~.jr:!\T I s CmfPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS: DEPART~.IE~T in TE SP;T RETURN DATELINE APPHOV[J) BY /) .. _j~.t~ ;-~ -b" J:?c; 2 '-/0 ,- ? 7' -------. ,r "b~f}~ &_Cerv-l* bt- ~ vt-f s ~cU0 . c'o~\r~,l~~\TS .-!,C~~;(] 5U;UU8~f.,l ~.! :j ~.~ E' I.~...~ (31 [1 J c~ ,~~ io1 ~=) i~' .:-... c. ~ '(} a ?~ J~\ ~ ~:j~) ;::~ :~~ .', . BUILDING :"E'RMIT .~_. City of Bremerton, Washington Phone: (206) 478-5281 OWNER'S VALUE BLDG. DEPT. VALUE PLAN CHECK FEE RECEIPT NO. PERMIT FEE $ $ gy;,U' ~~ $ (f)~_C:>-O SITE ADDRESS/LOCA~ION /)..:2 5'"' C~:J7;:f~/ ~/k~- OWNER'S NAME;t:~At./ /'.:c ./E?.?'f'~r . ADDRESS CONTRACTO~H?;j~ /!.e;-v,$<;; STATE CONTRACTOR'S L1C. # ADDRESS ). 3:7 J RECEIPT NO. DATE /} tJCJO 0 /:J. 77 d /' PHONE PHONE o RESIDENCE \. BUSINESS 0 OTHER NEW 0 REPAIR 0 REMODEL 0 ADDITION o DEMOLISH PLANNING I ZONING FIRE ZONE STORIES OCCUPANCY THIS PERMIT ISSUED FOR: j1t?~'c-~ cr:~/c! Ii' r - - All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. INSPECTIONS REQUIRED: Foundation ,J/ Framing .~ Plumbing 16~ Electrical r Wallboard J;;2f--- FINAL ~ SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. FOR INSPECTORS USE ONLY: REINSPECTION: ~PPROVED' NOT TYPE OF INSPECTION DATE TIME APPROVED COMMENT DATE TIME APPROVED FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED BY Building Inspector ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE REQUI,RED BEFORE deCUPfjIN,G BUILDING OWNER'S SIGNATURE DJ- ~~M~ k5'C~~ BY LJ,~ 2: lIIII-' ": M !II'!(';- fL S {l.~ J-\ I ~ U r~ ~' , I .'/"c CITY OF B.REl'JiE.ON' ~ BUILD!NG Dr'~RTi\~ENT I ,:. r.~~~:Fo.'.~J .. '""HIT"~'.' .~J..~.. (,CAH OH;" ,.5?3... f-i"J .. (~~? 7.) .. '/2..J#. ,- . '/ tv . '. C>:>RESS/LOCATIOr~ OF .JOB.. p~~';;' ~. ," ~.~I~. ::~_:~~ ;r.r......... .:... ......:.. ~... ................. . '" .:. i>PLICATION ISSUED FOR: . '-~... . .':... .'. ..~~...#7:Ic~.L-~~.,.. ;,;' .................... . . . . . . . .'. " . . . ... ROPERTY TAX ACCT. NO "00 , ............................. ll.............................. ANNING ZON1NG............fIRE_ZO~E......:..... - - . .- OCCUPANCy...... ~.... . ". TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION..... ..,.,.........' . CONTRACTOR.~~.~...... ' ]1 A!>D~ESS.. .j.3. 3:,~.-.'.Ld~~:~~~.'.'.'.'.'.'. . . .. .... ~':~~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . .. . . . . -0. : '.. .---;-ff- . . DRESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .... ._..-. .. ." . .. .-....:. rr . .t... . . ... . .. . P~:~~; -:...~.. .. . ".' STATE LI C. · ~ ~.~. '" ~ ~:~ . ...... .... . iGNA1URE"AP,PLlCANT. . . ..2::.~.... ...... ,DATE. /.0.... ...... . ./.. RECEIVED BY~.. .... :CEPTANCE OF APPLICA JON DOES NOT INSURE ISSUANCE OF BLDG. PERMIT.' ~'NNING COHMENTS/REVIEWEO p.Y..tV.'a.!.. / ' . ' ~b/tif?(c4tJ!/h&nt/b,&tr-,~?;a-,/V . ' t1t)??t'~ojl~L, ' . ,t!/)~ <7;7./# 1/7m?"~' /~7 /?/ jI~~v?/?uw~~ ~ y~ ' :;INEE,UNG COMMENTS/RK-IEwED BY..~ -L__o/( V' ", Q ...~,,- ';.'~- S ;U cJ:;; '"" j;' i ~ {-I - ~Y-OI Y I? o tuN' '<4'-- APP'O BY J0 .. , '; i i I I ! i I I ~ SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRE~ FOR WORK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, EXCAVATION, PAVING, SIOEWALKS,SANITARY & STORM SEWER. Rf DEPT. COMMENTS/~~VIEWED By.......... m'''.';J:r;'3'O;':'''\"~ ..r ~""-"\' ~ ~UJ ~""^--~~.' , ~MBING REVIEWED By..;....;.. . o!~~~ltr~lP:;" . - ....,.....--'...' --. ..' '\ .TER O(PT. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR PLUMBING ANO MECHANICAL WORK. ECTRICAL REVIEWED BY.......~.. '\ SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL WORK. I ILOINe; REviEWED BY..;....~......~ ~ A"I"'n ~'( . ~ to 1 r !' ! ~ . J -r,',:' ,~ )~ ~" ::'."~ .pr'~~o.'. .. . . . . . . . . ~. ( O"'TE. . ., . . ., . .,. . . .. I '; .~_-...,-.-;____~~.. . --';~~'''~'''~.<,~~ ""1 ~ . eN ~'f I C'I 1 Q ~,~ ,.,. ,: , \- ,-..( Inspections Required for Stated Construction BUILDING DEPARTMENT 0 FOUNDATION o ELECTRICAL 0 INSULATION 0 POST & BEAr~ o PLUHBING 0 SHEET ROCK OR COVER 0 FRAMING o MECHANICAL 0 FINAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT o FORM INSPECTION FOR CURD, GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND/OR DRIVEWAYS o FINAL INSPECTION FOR CURB, GUTTER, SIDEHALK, AND/OR DRIVEHAYS o CONNECTIOiJ TO CITY STORM OR SANITARY SEWER r~AIN LINES o INSPECTION OF PIPE INSTALLATION PRIOR TO BACKFILLING (City storm or sanitary sewers and side sewers) o INSPECTION OF STORM DETENTION SYSTEM PRIOR TO BACKFILLING o INSPECTION OF R/W EXCAVATIONS FIRE DEPARTMENT o o o LIFE SAFETY FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM o FIRE CODE o SPRINKLING SYSTEf'<l REMOVAL & INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND TANK THAT WILL CONTAIN FLAMMABLE MATERIALS Allow 24 hour prior notice for all inspections. Emergencies will be handled as soon as possible. If required inspections are not called for and made by the , necessary Ci ty Departments, a Stop t.-Jork Order \'Ji 11 be posted unti 1 necessary inspection is completed. Any materials hindering the inspection will be removed so an adequate inspection can be performed. All completed structures will have a Certificate of Occupancy BEFORE the structure is.occupied. If a structure is occupied without a CertificateOfOccupancy, the City will have the water utilities removed and order the structure vacated until compliance is achieved. I hav~ read and understand all the above that pertain to the construction at (Address) SIGNATURE TITLE DATE (~ , -, J -:'~I -.. " :r: ,".,. .. I -(J' ~ f , ! j , I ! --. ! . - ~ . ! . '., j i . i .' , .. 1. n;.' ~ ~," ,.. ',- , .f ',.' . ,.,. ......' ,.'. PER !>1 ITS .. Indicate below what requirements, permits are required for this project. PLAN~ING DEPARTMENT ~HORELINE ~~ 0 REZONE o VARIANCE 0 SHORT PLAT &;;NVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSHENT ~L- ~~ [JENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT [] SPECIAL USE PERMIT o CHANGE OF SITE PLAN BUILDING DEPARTMENT o BUILDING o MECHANICAL o HOUSE MOVING o ELECTRICAL o GRAD ING o PLUMBING o DEMOLITION o SIGN . .~- r ENGI~E~RING DEPARTMENT OS IDEWALK CONSTRUCTION 0 STOR1'! SEWERS 0 DRIVEWAY o CURB & ,GUTTER CONST. q SANJ:TARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION _. t',,, o STOR!-l DETENTION REQUIRED o INSURANCE AGREENENT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY 'i';ORK I' i I '< t t HEALTH DEPARTMENT o SEPTIC TANK o FOOD SERVICE ". .--.-.--.., . -'-'''--'.'-,,,.__ ."_h _ "',~,,_'~,,_. ~_.__-.,.._~.__.", ..... '0..__ ,.....,v.,...,..~ _.,...__ L ~~ !'~- " ''_,.._.....,,_______________ _ __.___.." '''''_''''~p_.___~.., Ji -- e . lOH~ SPEllJv1AN Governor ST ATE OF WASHINGTON '-,) DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 435D-150ih Avenue N.E. 0 Redmond. Washington 98052 . October 12 p 1981 Ci ty of Bn~Tllerton . Planning Departr:ent 239 Fourth Street Brernerton, Ivashington 98310 ~ECEnVED OCT 16 1981 City of 8remerton Pianning Dept. Dear !'IlS. Ii Ir. : Re : COUNTY: KITSAP APPLIC~\!T: DR. PJCHARD B. \'lESLEY SHORE LINE r.1A.t'lAGEMENT PERMIT #N 3507-18-A- (56-81) Development of a mLilical clinic. Tl1e subject Shor~line Management Substantial Development Permi.t was received by this office on October 8, 1981 The review period by the Department of Ecology and the Attorney GeneralIs Office will terminate 30 days from the above date. If no notice of appeal is received, construction pursuant to the permit may commence following expiration of the revi.ew period; provided, however, all other federal, state, and local laws regulating such construction have been complied with. ~. DONALD W. MOOS Dire<lor Sincere ly , J ~ ~/l..--t.--"7~"""v'-' C- I lr--~,J;'..-f~-1/)'-' Resource Manage~e~t NORTH'r'lEST REGIONAL OFFICE :n~ : sb cc' . Dr. Richard \'lesley I Ieadquarters Shara Stelling ECY 050-1-28 Rev. 6/78 .~---........ "> .. - 1l1li' j . (rev. 11/27/78) SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 19/] j)ERMI T FOR SHOI\E:L! NE ~'/\N^C[t.1ENT SUDSTAln 1 i\i !)[VEI,OPMENT, CONDITIOI'J/\L LISE OR VI\I'.if\NCE P(:rJlli t Nn, _,. 59.-81,_____,__ /\ullli II i s tel' i Ill.! 1\(J',::I1CY C i LY,,~~__I\r',c:Il!(',~~l:(J,~~__ 0,1 te /"\")',',)1.'.' Cc"t'!' (,',',1 ) "r" d 7'12/81 c" i'd:: ,., ':...- _ ___, IllljlrOved X DCil i eu Da te __~L~~/81_,___,_,____ ,Type of Action (s) t_~_J Subsl:3nti,:l1 Development Penlli L 1==1 COile! it i ona I Use. C--=-J Va ,- i ancp. i"ur':;,;uanl to"I<CW 90.58, a penni l l~; hereby ~J""l'ltcd to ______Q!::,:-Bi cl:!~~d B. ~_~~-=--__\______"_,__,____,_____ ..___ \ n a me 0 rap p 1 'C ,1 n L ) c/o Doug Weeks, Architect ---...------- (a del res s-r-- 2533 Wheaton Way, Bremerton, WA 98310 to undertake the following development: Medical Clinic and associated parking \'J i t. Ii i 11 Port ~~ashingto~ Nar.rows_______ unci/or' name of via tel- Cil-C':) I L:') ,:i<,';Ul: i CI ted ,'Ie t 1 and::,. uiJon the fol lowing pl'Openy: (It-::SFJl c1cscr-iption) (to the ne,Jn,:sl: qUClrtel' section, to\'lnsh i p, j-Clnge): Lots 4t 5, 6 and Lot 26 except the West 4 ft, Lots 27 & 28, Blk. 28, U.S. Navy Yard !\ddition to Bremerton, located within SW~ of Section 12, T24N, R1E) w.r,1., in Bremerton, Kitsap Co., WA not be '.'iirllill '_,l1o'-l!lillC', of ';tatc\"lidc :.ii~JnficCJ!l('c (11C\-1 90.S8,030) (t;;)(not~) be locate-d vlithin~; Urban Commercial <lc:siynation. The follO\'iing ((:'l~f;:or;m;.~;;~---'- . ' ITI.JSl:cI' pn)~jI',J11i p,-ovisions are appl iC;.1blt~ to this devl;loplllcnl: P. 30, Commerclal Dev.; 'F'i-i:ate the master pros!ram P. 35, Grading & Drainage; P. 36~ Land Clearing; P. 37, Utilities; & others Till' pi'u Ice:_ ';'II I I The project \'j 1 , 1 I ,.,.. \ . ., ~ -~--- -------- - - --- --- -- --- '\ "dJUl?!.lI?i\ 2q"j ';:I!iJou<=>ci .10 osn leuO\OlIPuo:J Citll ro\('IIL' q:J!LjI/i 11l1?JlJ(ue! J;:J.1Sf:!H JU LlOIIJOc! dLp I'J!:iUdP! USlt: ';nUl?!Jl:i\ .10 c1sn l,-"uOI:l!pU(n I; ~I . !",1 .,,', ' ~-~- ----~._---- - ------ - ~ (L ~ 9 . d :poda(J A.JOS ~^P\f aas) lS.:I;)~_~o JC' <c;\I(\! l=';'s - ,I '. City of Bremerton (Dr. Richard Wesley) Permit for Shoreline Management Substantial Development #56-81 -2- Deve 1 oprnent pursuant to th'l s permit shall be underta ken pursuant to the fo 11 O\\li ng terms and condit'ions: 1. Th'is permit is subject to the various requ'irements contained in the f3remerton Shore1 ine Management ~laster Program) the Uniform Bu-ilding Code and other applicable laws and regulations. It is the responsib'ility of the developer to assure compliance with the applicable provisions contained therein~ 2. The site shall be developed essentially the same as the modified site plan 1 abe 1 ed II Exhi bit 8" except as modifi ed to meet any condit-j ons of approval 1 isted herein. 3. Any changes, revisions or additions which constitute a significant departure from the approved site plan shall require approval of the City Council under the provisions of WAC 173-14-064. 4. The use of the subject building shall be limited to offices for four (4) physicians/physician specialists excluding Family Practitioners, Pediatricians and Opthamologists. " 5. The applicant shall be requ"jred to meet the full requirements of City Ordinances for numbers of parking stalls at any future time should the City Council determine that such a need exists upon such evidence as lwight be submitted to them. (Note: The Planning Commission approved a variance to the parking requirements on 9/1/81 by Resolution No. 608 wh"jch allowed a reduction in the, . umber of spaces from 39 to 29.) Prior to issuance of any build'ing permits the developer shan:. ' (a) Receive approval from the Engineering Department for measures to control silt and sedimentation dur-ing and after construction.' 7. Prior to issuance of any building permits the developer shall obtain approval from responsible City Departments for a site plan ~\lhich includes: (a) Water service from Lebo Blvd. (b) Adequate fire hydrans access for fire apparatus to be approved by the Fire Department. (c) Minimum b"icycle parking facilities: (1) Two (2.) maximum securi ty, long-term use spaces for emp'] oyees . (can be inside building). (2) Tvvo (2) conveniently located minimum security, short-temi use spaces for clients. (d) The developer shall grant to the public and record with the Kitsap , County Auditor a publ ic pedestr"ian easement over any tidelands which' they may own on/or adjacent to the subject site. ~ Storm "a ter drainage faci 1 i ti es as approved by the Ci ty Engi neer. 2Ct? Sanitary sewer faeil it-j es \-vhi eh meet the apj)rova 1 of the CHy Eng; neer. 8. to issuance of any occupancy permit the developer shall: < Construct and enter into a binding agreement to install, maintain and operate a sanitary sewer pump station if required by the Engineering Department. " . .-. .," - '- - . - _J - -I ~ .. .. . ,,^ h n ~ r" m r. h 01 1 I,' " If ~ Construct a concretes, aeWct TK-wn,11 l-1I1 \.-!\cllCQuc'-':J"" ,--",T>7~" - --, to the alignment and grade set by .the Engineerin 9 Depai~tment. ihow compliance with all above listed conditions of the substantial )eve 1 oprnent Permit. ---~~ . ! . '. '. e e Ci ty of Br-emerton (Dr. Richard Wesley) Permi t for Shorel i ne ~lanagement Substantial Development #56-81 -3- This permit is granted pursuant to the shoreline management act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other ' federal t state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to.this project, but not inconsistent with the shoreline management act (Chapter' 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee '. fails to comply with the terms or conditions thereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN-OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING THE FINAL ORDER OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN1TIATED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED~ EXCEPT AS PROVIDED iN RCW 90 ~ 40)(5)(a)(b)(c). O~ J< ~LE~~JAR~T . MAYOR (Signature of Authorized Local Government Official) 10/6/81 (date)" THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL use OR VARIANCE PERMIT. Date received by Department of Ecology Approved Denied Th-j s condit-iona 1 use/vari ance permit is approved/deni ed by the Department of Ecology pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: -(da te) (Signature of Author-ized Department of Ecology Official) ....... - e e CITY OF BREMER TON R~~R~~l~XFINALDECLARATION OF ~~~~~~~~INON-SIGNIFICANCE. Description of proposal The proposal is for construction of a clinic for two doctors on upper level for treatment of chest diseases, etc. proposed rental space for medical uses on lower (daylight basement) level. ?roponent Dr. Richard B. Wesley Location of Proposal on north side of the Port Washington Narrows at approx. 1231 Campbell Way, Bremerton, WA Lead Agency CITY OF BREMERTON This proposal has been determined to (W7X>J,("not have) a significant adverse '7nr - c t 'loon "he env' ~on""o""'" '~n ET~S r,v.v..v,,:I.; '" not) _~, eo.'ul' ~~'eQ' 'un. de~.. -.I)L~.',.T h'O). ::".L'" . ':"""1-;c. . ", vJ. .,;,... ^,u<:::,,;". n. _ 'f>.jW\"'~ . ' \, '/ ~ \J 030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a corr::pleted envirorJ.mental checklist* and other infor:::atio::-: on file ,'Ii th the lead agency. *(Environmental checklist submitted for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit #56-81 & Negative Declaration issued 9/2/81.) Responsible Official KENNETH W. ATTEBERY Posj.tion/Ti tIe PLANNING DIRECTOR .lOt2fi/- 81 SignatUl'e Date . e . e;. 1'-, ; '--'l Lh U\.\ n~. \~ n WI ~ (D).. ,I, . U V Ib J - (~ G '~. 0 6 1981 November 6, 1981 9rrem~rtOrl '~'",," Oepar" 'I~'~"i: TO: Building Department FROM: Engineering Department SUBJECT: Plan Rev~ew - Bremerton Chest Clinic Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit #56-81 imposed conditions that must be met prior to issuance of a bui 'jding permit. Some of these have not been fulfilled. 6 (a) 7 (e) 7 (f) Sedimentation control. The plan contains no mention of the measures proposed to control silt and sedimentation. I need to know how the contractor will control the siltation resulting from runoff over the cut slopes and prevent damage to adjacent private property and City streets and deposition of the silt material into Port Washington Narrows. Storm Drain Facilities. Elevations given on the plan of storm drain structures appear to be inconsistent with the intent to drain to the existing catch basin in Campbell Way. I need data to verify that the system will function properly Sanitary Sevvey'. If the elevation of the sanitary main 1n Campbell Way is accurate there should be no problem in achieving the required slope on the service line. Field conditions could necessitate the installation of a pump station. The rockery along the northwesterly side of the project appears to be on the adjacent property. If this is a fact an easement must be secured from thi s property ovmer. ~ ALLAN L. KANE, P.E. Ci ty Engi neer ALK:m :i (J.?t",~f )''1'1 1f frr ~"'JfJ~ ~~ ~ ~fetMA Q4-e- o./dr-~'a.J. ~ (~ . - CITY HALL , ... ' ~" , A '17 ' . .- ,,0~ ,~-. . ,/--;~_:)-., ~ d' ~~ ~ /;", .;,.~ t,~ .f;. (flJ'" / ,.'" ',,,-;-,~_.. ~ ' . .. ";:O"",;....~ ~ ..iJ v . <'_.::::~., v 6' \''''--J. /' '~'J.'t'f.... :....~~ ~ j- ~ j _./ '\ ~ ... ... 60 S -'\~ .' Jt, ......-- ~...:>,..> J!. ...", :n -:- . -- - ./""/ "'r- i<'[f-"" ." "'-:.:. . ...,' (:-, 0' -- ~~, ..A ~ ( C:;::~~,"'l &~, "';J'N.~, .1,. ,1...."I\;/n,(!.;JJ;~:p/'l ';~'~~A8~\). \ :' ,~h. Af-rj,'~;i'}) Ln J;;,-i-dr .&In;~,\.-' -:,:~;', ,-C,~...,/. :',,'. ~'.'/\c ~,~ ~vWCu-Y I... "f[{p'J!'t ':.':l , :(f/::t::/U.17I.!/i!t::/'Jf/,~Jj~,..,., , '~,.. '- ': t", <Y"',F'I',:"- "l'r "~t'i8:'<' '.t::'v ); /', '4lfu.,/ ~ J ~C.-<: ': -=$" [.d."2dV """",;;' '\ ~. '- '^- -.;,:.. / .... ,'. . .~ ) Jo(.~; ~."'" <f ;;::;.vr'.(..,..-;;Y '--l..' S"-~ ~ "'\,:?~ ^ . \.:.'" -:':""' .~.. ''''~<'''''''''.:'~ . '" . ~ ~'>-, ~' ... \:\ ~ ~~ ~ ,f.: ffJ'" 't' .. _.~ V"'7A..... -""'~. ....il~", '-- ',~. ,< ;"~-' ',." ~l"" ~ --- /f ~. ,- i~P ~.',. ", '5:" '" '/~" ,"~"'. . <' ..;- ,,= ,v' ,~; '\....~ ~?;,~.J ,,~~~';:'J.'::iz'Z,"" .,~'&'%-=-V'-4:.l\Sl;1I, ~JiG1;U\_ ~,. .~,'" _~. '. -",<.J'~''$!->" ',;; '::", ""L.~ .': " . ~ j:~',.'"'J'-"""",1)~~-A;-'~;n.--' ~:"i "'~'::l. ~~_..'r~ ~~ ~"'V _ ...f-'''J~>' ~"'.. '. ~~~. -'...~r - " --.. <"...,.~ 1.. ,.\~~~ l~lHE o[y!C\eIBS ---:.r:-~"-,-~~. -c::::..~,---->, 2f" '~~~,:~.;~ ~ -..:.r... ~~=4"',,~ Jot: -239 f=@UFiTH STRr::ETl\g8~1 O~ <"::., ~U:')o.~ -,~ ~ ~/~"_..:::-::~ .c=----=:~....~_~~~__~~_~ ~.-..--~-~~~~c~\~t.~~ __S-. "", . '"__ ~~ MAYOR AND COMMiSSIONER COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY OF PUBLIC WORI<S AND UTiLITIES COMMISSIONER CITY CLERK OF FiI'~N!CE AND ACCOUNTING AND PURCHASING AGENT Novembey' 18 ~ 1981 PLAN REVIEf./.' .1225 Campbell Yay; BRE/.JERTON CHEST CLINIC 1. Hydrant must be instaZZed pl-;{,O~[' to any cor:struction as per comments of ? /27 /81 to Plann'tng Depw"tment. 2. lnstalZ Fire alo~ system as per 1977 Fire Alarm Cod.e; plans to be su.bmitted for appl"oval. 3, Appar'ent occupant load calls for exi,t doors to SlJ'/:r>..g 1..[1 the dh"ection of egress, 4 . iVO dool'" se hedu le 1..8 s (';()l,Jn on plans. 5. Eleetx'ical; exit lights~ emel"gency lighting... etc? - not shoum,' 6. Site must be keDt clean cmd a dwnster pY'oV1:ded. Burninrz of seY'o.p buildir>..g mateY'i~ls is prohibited. ---~.;:W~ ~ ~~~~77~-- ~ :"~ .."\ :'.. ..' b. '~" ~ ~. .. .~ ~ ~.. HOME OF THE PUGET SOUND NAVAL BASE AND SHIPYARD .. ~ . e e ~ ~\ \ ~\ \i" I r ' I ,\,':, ==-ift"'j Vv' RADIATION PROTECT~ON 6521 Beach Drive S.W. . Seattle. Washington 98136 November 25, 1981 DOUG WEEK ARCHITECTS 2333 Wheaton Way Brernerton, vJashington 98310 S ub j e c t : SHIELDING DESIGN OF CHEST X-RAY UNIT AT DR. R. B. WESLEY'S CHEST CLINIC. Oea r K i rn : Enclosed are the calculations and plans for the Chest X-Ray Unit. As you can see from the plans, the FLOOR will require a 1/32-inch (2 pound) Lead sheet because the area belmv is occupied. A 1/24-inch Lead sheet may be substituted for economy be- ca use it is Stock Lead. The CEILING will not require any additional shielding. The NORTH vJall will need 1/16-inch (4 pow1d) Lead because of the Chestboard, which makes it a Prirnary Beam wall. The DOOR on the North Wall will require a Solid Core door,to attenuate the secondary radiation. The EAST Wall will require a sheet of 1/32-inch Lead to attenuate the secondary radiation, The SOUTH Wall will not require additional shielding. The DARKROOM on the ~vall side will not be occupied during x-ray exposures, and vlill not need shielding. The FILM stored in the Darkroom should be shielded with 1/16-inch (4 pound) Lead to prevent the film from fogging. The CONTROL BOOTH along the West Wall will require 1/24-inch (2-1/2 pound) Lead. The \~INDCM in the Control Booth must be at least 12 inches by 12 inches, and have a 1 ead equi va 1 ence of 1/16-i nch (4 pound), wh i ch is a Stock item. The req ui rements of 18 inches of Shielded \~all Space between the Booth Edge and \.JindOlv, and the 7.5 square feet of Unobstructed Floor Space in the Booth are met. In order to meet the requirement of 40-inches between the Open Edge of the Booth and the Exposure Sit/itch, the Control Console must be moved as deep as possible into the Booth. I am sending a copy of this report to Henry Kocol, of the Wash'ington State Radiation Control Section-DSHS, for revie\v, If you have any questions concerning this shielding design, please contact me. WU1: gnw Enclosures. Sincerely, , I) ,'I . ::,d(!,~,./ /'i/f}'/" . I ! t . / / U(. I IL..- , . . WILLIAM E./~10RGAN Health Phys"lcist ,. JOHN SPELl.M,-\N Covern.or ,. ~ ~ :: : ~ ~: " -.- . ';.. ~..,.'::~: ALAN I, GIBBS SecrelJry ST/\TE OF W,\SHINCrnN DEPARTlv1ENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTI--i SERVICES '1-109 Smith Tower, U 17':J 0 5e.1llle, \.Va,hin,l;w{] </(j /IJ-I 0 (-,(!(,) ,i6-1-(,I!-JO 0 (Sc-iN) 576-68-iO December 7, 1981 Or. R. B. Wesley Bremerton Chest Clinic Bremerton, Washington Dear Dr. \~esley: In accordance with Washington State Rules and Regulations for Radiation Protection, WAC 402-28-032, on December 1, 1981, Mr. Wi1iam E. Morgan has submitted to this agency recommendations for the shielding of your new x-ray facility. A review of the recommendations, in view of the data submitted, indicates that the recommended shielding will be adequate to protect clinical personnel and clientele from unnecessary x-ray radiation. Therefore, the shielding is accepted as submitted. Please note that full compliance with WAC 402-28-052 is expected, in that the X-ray exposure switch must be mounted in such a manner that it is impossible for an operator to make exposures from an unprotected area. Therefore, the X-ray control panel must be installed as recommended by Mr. Morgan, and any changes in the location of the X-ray control panel or the exposure switch, or in the plans themselves, must be resubmitted for approval. If you have any questions, please contact this office at 206-464-6840. ~' in __relY,( /) ~l,'- -G-Gf ' ~o , Superv i SOl' X-ray Control Unit HK: jd cc: Mr. William E. Morgan DOllg \~eek Arch i teet s ~ X . 1 --16 F ac. ''';~:_~':3-<1l.' J : .- e /' . - 4. ~I I .... - r- , i, , i . .. ~ I ::~,.....,/, J: fl.; ~~ --I,::,..~' ...- i_ I .::1. ~...:.'. 1 , , ,. ;. ,.~ . ~- cr--',~.I, ._ -- i.. to""... ~. ';':. . ' :. ,.;, '. $-' . t, ... ~ y;~': : . ~. ., t :. .' . , '. .~.' .:,'. :-'-"'_J!!':f~~,.l"':f~.~.~~-~f ',' '--"'-"---, "'-1' ,....'-" ,,' .r~ .-.~-;, n") "'. . 1<' ) .' "J ~\. -- It: . . ~' 't.:. '~~.,~ ~': "'U .. r-=-.;.t':;:,.":"1%'.t:.:..:"::::-: \ I i k to j,-",',-: ",. . hJ&.~d-. ~ .1 ' -' ~, :'~ ~:"I C~#~:~=i-:-':t::~~~;;:~..~ ,f i '" .:! ..., '\.; . ;' r" _1.; :_',:.rS;.:" .; j , I, :1 --- f~.::c:~~:~~..:.t:::'..:,-,.- .,,- . \.\ ~ - 'It., . --~ ~Ot. rjf~:'i .., \\ \\ .., -'~\T' ~: \>. ,r. ~' \l~ :_~". .._~. _.~ ;' '\ \, . ....,,\. ~ ,~~~~iW'_', Iii' '\ E 'I A- f},~ RoDM ~'~":'~--" ~ L ,,' "'~-.~:_CJ-":~..'.,~ ': ! [~ ,.,:",<, . ;"~~~.~i~~~::~: \\, .,..~ \' '.'. ,( , ~i :::... ~-;"',,. ~~:/.Jf /' ',i i': :. . {; C', (:,'.,;.. I ''''. -- ~ . , , , "I : ,.,,...- i'.;. <~ fl . ; .- '~i! : '.-. --._..:'. ~.: !' ~----_.' .--. ~~, ..-j;l:~:.,~--:~ . -~- :.:..;mfc...L~;.;i...A _~..,;:-,r\ -:.:h~......_~. ':-: :.._~",:':!..~...:~:::;L~, , .. . , :I .'.:JE)tAM .. l2co!t1 ~ ~-~'._-. .=.~~. L....--___. _." \~'\:. \~ ~, , ( ! \ , , I {.--- ..- LNMJI MEA- ~ ~(l~~:'j.::'~_&t'_ ~_.~..-: ':.';~~'~ j ~,E ~ ~{f[)iU ! ~..:,.. " [>' u __ . ..._ __ .~ _.__ _ '- ,i I 1 h~= [I. N ~,,\ v.~ /I, [=111'\ II ~ 132 L:-I1-1...J 'S H'E~'T =y.c"~ iI /I LEAo btJ E E- T I;;l!- . . . K II LE-A--D s-l-l-r:;:. ~T Ib }/; li LEA 0 .: 6-LA ss;. EyAh1.iZ6utl1. . SksLDW lit! 54-0' E In EItJ'f' "0" '" I ;CU,( J(\. ,. ,~ I~I ~. . -- . e " Bremerton Chest Clinic SHIELDING REQUIREMENTS K V : 150 MA: 300 W: ~OO Dr. R. B. Wesley CHEST ONLY DATE: 11-25-81 10 Patients per day DISTANCE REQUIRED ADDED SHIELDING* AREA TO PRIM/ CONTROL USE OCCUP WUT SHIELD EXISTING PEOPLE SEC LEAD CONC SHIELD WALL- ( tit) (mm) (-<.11 ) LEAD CONC BOARD FLOOR 10 SEC NO 1 1 500 0.6 -- 3/4 "PLYWOOD 1/32" * -- -- eEl LI NG NO SEC NO 1 NO --- --- -- --- -- -- -- 2ea-S/8" NORTH WALL 7 PRl NO 1/4 125 1.7 W"AT.T. 1 /1 h" - 1 -- -- -- 10 SEC 0.25 SOLlDCORE D< OR -- EAST WALL 5 SEC NO 1 1/2 250 0.8 -- 2ea-S/8" 1/32" -- -- WALLBOARD SOUTH WALL 10 SEC NO 1 1/2 250 0.45 -- 2ea-S/8" -- -- -- vvALLBOARD ItJEST WALL 14 SEC NO 1 1/2 250 0.25 -- 2ea-S/S" -- -- -- WALLBOARD CONTROL BOOTH 5 SEC NO 1 1 500 1.0 -- 2ea-S/S" 1/24" -- -- IvALLBOARD WINDOW 5 SEC NO 1 1 500 1.0 -- --- 1/4" LEAD GLASS*** -0 * Shielding to 7 feet high in walls. * * 1/24" Lead may be substituted for economy because it is Stock Lead. *** Stock Lead Glass 1/16" lead-equivalence, Density of 4.2 pounds per square foot. . -:------w-....~.-~.-. ,_..,... .."~.~ ~.._~--..---.:.....:.... " .; GEO'I'ECHNICAL INVESTIGATION \vESLE Y CLINIC BREl'-lERTON, WASHINGTON CERT. NO. 818-65G r w' z" ',: .,. ll' \.1.120 N.E:. 21~>t STI-?l:::ET Bf:::LLEVUE. \.-VA.SHING'TON 08007 12061 641.257.3 SEATTLE e:Vl!Rf!TT (206) 525-6700 (2,00' ::5'*-00 \-, o. e e CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING 8< INSPECTION I ENGINEERS IGEOLOGISTS August 28, 1981 Cert. No. 818-65G Doug Weeks, Architect 2333 Wheaton \'lay Bremerton, WA 98310 Reference: Geotechnical Investigation \vesley Cl inic Bremerton, Washington Dea r Mr. Weeks: and slope stability. We submit herewith a report of our findings, At your request vie have conducted a geotechnical investigation at the site of the proposed Wesley Clinic on Wheaton Way in Bremerton, Washington. The investigation addresses both foundation conditions concl.usions and recommendations. PUl{POSE Th e pro j e c t , as we understand ]'.- . L.., is to consist of a two ( 2 ) story >,'j ,,'I /"'j ,,] f tl: t. :~ ': "] ~~~':l ~,d .~': 1 ~:,i!J., 't ,',' ~ .".!'" ~;;:~ ':;\~'~ ,# .' :',~:.~ , -.:~tt~ ~~~'<t~ '.b( f ~,'1 ~~'l' :',;L: , ':>:,:.:: .,'!<,:t'; 'I~;:: ~: ''','.' : ~~:~~} f The purpos e of th i s study wa s to de termi ne soi 1 condi t ions a nd to formulate recommendations to assist In the design and placement of the proposed facilities, wood structure with an at.tached t.wo (2) story reinforced concrete parking facility. A continuous spread footing lS to be used under the building walls and several footing pads (many separate footings) Lnder the building interior. The upper level of the parking area is to be supported on columns with individual footings. The lower parking level will be asphalt on grade. The client wishes to place the building close to the edge of the slope as judged safe. '1 J ", . . ] CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. IESTING & INSPECTION I ENGINEERS IGEOLOGISTS Au'gust 28,1981 Cert. No. 818-65G Doug Weeks, Architect Pet 9 12 2 SCOPE Cascade Testing Laboratory representatives visited the site on August 26,1981. Extensive visual reconnaissance of the geology, topography and vegetation of the site and surrounding areas was made, Three (3) backhoe test pits were dug to ten (0) foot depths across the building area. Drawings showing topography and building plans were supplied by the architect. SITE DESCRIPTION The property containing the proposed building site J,S located be- tween Wheaton \'lay on the north and Port Washington NarrO\vs on the south, ,ln Bremerton, \.'lashington. The property extend::. froln the water to the road right-of-way. Sl~ The southern half of the property consists of a densely vegetated s lope a verag ing approxima t.ely thirty-three (33) degrees. Port ions of the s lope are approxirna tely forty-five (45) degrees a nd for distances of a few feet the slope may approach sixty (60) degrees. Detailed observation of the slope was very difficult because of dense vegetation, especially blackberries. The slope adjacent to the park located approximately three hundred (300) to five hundred (500) feet west of the proposed building site was sufficiently free of vegetation to permit detailed observation of soil types. e e CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 1-l::STING tic INSPECilON / ENGIN~Ef-?S IGEOLOGIS1.S l\ugust 28, 1981 Cert. No. 818-65G Doug Weeks, Architect Page 3 Soils observed on the exposed slopes near the park included what appeared to be overconsolidated glacial silts with minor amounts of gravel, and sand and gravel lenses. associated with the gravel lenses. enough flo\" to create a few cubic feet of mud downs lope. Some seepage appeared to be One seep below the park had site. Seepage was also noted on the slope below the proposed building Overconsolidated silts, which corresponded to those observed below the park, were observed at the base of the slope below the building site. The silty and gravelly sands which were excavated 1n the test pits are assumed to form the upper ten (10) feet or more of the slope. Alder trees less than fifty (50) years old near the toe of the slope be 10"'; the building site were bent approximately ninety (90) degrees. This indicates slow downslope movement has taken place 1n the last f if t Y ( 50) yea r s . Large trees in the middle and upper portions of the slope did not appear to be bent. Tidal high water comes up to the toe of the slope. Some undercut- ting was apparent, as much as one (1) foot in Some areas. Building'Site The proposed building site is located on level ground to the north of the slope. Vegetation consists of brush and grasses in this area. Soils appear to be very well drained. '~ "" ., '..' b] ..1" 1 r: 1 '/. _J .1 ':1 J ~~ 's iJ J e e CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC TESTING 8< INSPECTION / ENGINEERS /GEOLOGISTS August 28, 1981 Cert. No. 8l8-65G Doug Weeks, Architect Pag e 4 GEOLOGY No rock IS exposed on or near the site. Soils present appear to be all of glacial origin. Overconsolidated glacial silts with sand and sravel lenses comprise the lower portions of the slope. Three (3) test pits were dug around the proposed building site (see test pit logs and site plan). rl'he upper two (2) feet typically showe c1 s i 1 t Y san d s . Th e s e s i 1 t Y san d s we r e t y pic a 11 y u n de r 1 a i n by medium dense to dense clean sands containing variable amounts of gravel. All test pits were terminated in sandy material at depths of approximately ten (0) feet. These sandy materials are probably glacial outwash. Exposures 1n the area suggest that the total thickness of the out- wash sands does not exceed twenty (20) feet. The sands are probably underlain by the overconsolidated glacial silts previously men- tioned. No fill was observed, but the upper six (6) inches of the soil near the road appeared to have been disturbed. H YDROLOG Y ]80ils excavated In the test pits appeared to be very free draining, a nd were in a dry to damp s ta te. Soi Is exposed on the s lope were generally dry, except around seepage areas and along the beach. ~l . Ii 01 l _.il !l '" CJ '1 \ .J ;;/ .j J . . CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. 'n::::STING t~ INSf=)I'::CTION I ENGINEERS IGEOLOGIS.rr.; August 28, 1981 Cert. No. 818-65G Doug Weeks, Architect Pa 9 e 5 During the wet season it 15 anticipated that the building site and the soils immediately below the foundation will not become saturat- ed. Perched water tables and greatly increased seepage on the slope are anticipated c1uringthe wet season. Water J.S expected to move througll sand and gravel layers and be confined by the silts. As a res ult, wa ter wi 11 move re la ti ve ly free ly in t 1112 hor i zonta 1 eli rec- tion and very slowly in the vertical direction. Much of the water movlng through the soil will probably exit through the face of the slope, toward the south. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMr-mNDATIONS The project as proposed appears to be compatible with the site. No IlIa jor problems a re ant icipa ted, provided sound a nd pruden t cons truc- tion techniques are utilized by the contractor. Our observations and calculations suggest that major slope failures within this property are unlikely. Continued undermining of the toe of the slope on the beach and weakening of soils on the slope sur- fa ce by seepage suggest tha t cont i nued g radua 1 movement 0 f sma 11 amounts (on the orcler of a few cubic yards) of soil and vegetation i s to be e x p e c t e d . It i s strongly recommended that t his sma 11 s c ale movement of material be monitored over the years. If exceSS1ve undermining or loss of slope material occurs, some type of remedial laction may become necessary. Minimizing runoff from the building , and parking areas will help to alleviate the problem of gradual slope erosion. A I1lln1lllurn building set back of fifteen (15) feet from the edge of the slope is recommended to maximize bearing capacity and minimize slope stability risk. .. " " CASCADE TESTING L.ABORATORY, INC, 'n:'t:-"TING tJ. IN:.:;.I;'L::C 'rtON Il{NGotNL:l:..'~~> I Gf.::OLC)GIST'-'; August 28, 1981 Cert. No. 818-6SG Doug Weeks, Architect Pa g e 5 During the wet season it is anticipated that the building site and the soils immediately below the foundation will not becorne saturat- ed. Perched water tables and greatly increased seepage on the slope are anticipated during the wet season. Water is expected to move through sand and gravel layers and be confined by the silts. As a result, water will move relatively freely in the horizontal direc- tion and very slowly in the vertical direction. Much of the water movlng through the soil will probably exit through the face of the slope, toward the south. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOtvlt-1ENDATIONS The project as proposed appears to be compatible with the site. No major problems are anticipated, provided sound and prudent construc- tion techniques are utilized by the contractor. Our observations and calculations suggest that major slope failures within this property are unlikely. Continued undermining of the toe of the slope on the beach and weakening of soils on the slope sur- face by seepage suggest that continued gradual movement of small amounts (on the order of a few cubic yards) of soil and vegetation :1 t,,:,'J ..1. ,,}.. r:;-::: ',' '," ,Vl',""':r" Vj;;':;; I:,;@j is to be expected. It is strongly recommended that this small scale movement of ma terial be moni tared over the years. If exceSSlve undermining or loss of slope material occurs, some type of remedial ,action may become necessary. Minimizing runoff from the building , and parking areas will help to alleviate the problem of gradual slope erosion. A minimum building set back of fifteen (15) feet from the edge of the slope is recommended to maximize bearing capacity and minimize slope stability risk, t;;:l ;~:"1 ,',';:1 ~;r',"l r..' 1 ii,! 'i~: i;'~ j:!."'~" l.,., . ~_ '~".',',":~1~~ :";'. <:;.Jo;.:.: '...' .;;:.. : " f:"':"- .::'~t~: ,.,j ;l~ )t 1::;,1 ~J ~,;: :;1 ~;'~ QrflF f'~ . " - be tightlined and run into the storm sewer system. Efforts should CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. n=:STING 0. INSPE;:CTtON / ENGI""'JEERS /GEOLOGISTS August 28, 1981 Cert. No. 818-65G Doug Weeks, Architect Po. g e 6 All runoff from building roofs, walkways, parking areas, etc. should be made to eliminate any surface runoff down the slope. A safe allowable maX1mum soil bearing capacity of 3000 psf may be used provided that: 1. Above recommendations concerning building setback from slope and drainage collection are followed. 2 . Fo 0 tin 9 s P 1 ace d 1 nth e den s e g r a ve 11 y san c1 f 0 u n din t est pit s one (1) and two (2) shall be buried a minimum of twelve (12) inches within suitable d~nse granular material. 3. Footings placed 1n the medium dense sand found 1n test pit three (3) sha1.l be buried a f111nlmLlrn of thirty (30) inches by dense granular material. We fully expect the on-site soil conditions to reflect our findings. However, some local variations may Occur. Should soil conditions be ~:' I "~J 0';:( t ...'..;............'..! t- , I,,' {l -' ., 1 'Ii ," """:"'.. " i' .';1 ;) ;'j . ' I t 1 S r e c 0 nUll end e c1 t hat the s 0 i 1 s e n g 1 nee r 0 r his r e pre s e n tat i ve be present to inspect footing excavations prlorto placing footing concrete to confirm adequate bearing materials. ~ncountered that cause concern and/or are not discussed herein, the I soils engineer should be contacted immediately. .;{ '.,:,:'t.' """ ..':..'......i.i'j..~ ~> .~,--, . ,,,.~", .'" j' .. .. "'.1 " :.:~:: j ~ ~ i:.. '." .01,: ; '" ::~~;~ .. - - ;1 >f.j;1 CASCADE TESTING LAI30RATORY. INC. l-L:::ST1NG L1o: INSPI:Cl"ON / ENGINEE:F?S /GEOLC)G1STS August 28, 1981 Cert. No. 818-65G Doug Weeks, Architect Pa g e 7 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Doug ,,: l~ Weeks for specific application to the proposed Wesley Clinic struc- engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, 15 I:' i,.,: ~.. ,; \,:: ~~~ ~..,. ;: ture, 1n accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation macie. ~,; ~i. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you. If you should have any additional questions please feel free to contact us at any time. il., ~;.~ " ~l ; Sincerely, r;_: CASCADE TESTING LABOR}\TORY, INC. ,," /2:/ /~ / 7? ~~c~y~. ~J\ : );:_;~ :r . ~ '1 : -I- /1) ~ /i ~v~"'-' ---k-: I Steven Foley Geological Engineer SF:rnjg :;:"~~"_~~~~.-<.'n:">~"'_'*'=r':'"",,,,^,_-:;';:;:;:';;':::;:;;::;'-=;;;""':-';~-;;:;;;;';;,;:;;;~~1E1~_illi~~7!""'''''=~:'::'~~~''~.'. .., . ~ h y~-~~ 'j'"" ~';~ !:J 4:" :i,' },l " 'I~ " ~l '~ W fi-;. 1i',' i~"' APPENDIX A ~, TEST PIT LOGS ~ ~ f .. ,', .. e T. P. - l I Soil Description end Classification ! ol:'~',:' u~\-\\ BeO\v,.J \ :5ILI'-( , I -Li.fy I "'-J..:..J:.__ I.Q :.;~ I '5AN.\:.:r-{ LoM\. · 0'..~ .... . o.e. ...9. -5 - ~ D. . 0'" '..: - .~; 6 DtSNSE:, ID ;\\E..\::)\U~ ~E..., 13C2.Q\...jJ _ 'lD G,\ZA"Y Ll'ZAVEUX .jMD \ \.Je.....J......- G;eADED \ -50;\\6 (200TS \ 'iJ U?.cA<Sc cq2AVe.L CoN'reM' \.JITH DET?T1-\ DAt\.\ F , 0 .D. -10 9...... . o ~. :'0.. :..~ .'.() o' .0, . . . '0,(1 ?~'.".\: 0..0. I.D, ~ 10' Notes: T P.'.5 I Soil Description and Classification o .: ,ll1J'. " _ '0" . ~ I ~I I I,' -5-..... cr . ~ . . . . 0 . A\~DIUt\.\ DENSE', Llc,,\\-\T ~\2/l:"i-5eo\~Al, A\OTn_ED, \Ve:LL.-C1eADED 5AJJD ,-Jrrn ;::x::)!\.\E: ~'2..A.0EL \ 5U~~'L>( ^-\O\s\, 024M ICS IrJ. DPPE e.. CD 1\ . . .c. ,. /:.:. 0:: J: -10'. ...... . I. . .Q . l;~:~i \ 1. 1\ I I \1-J I Notes: .t , I Ii ,I .------- TEST PIT LOG "-'~'~'~,"'~~."'M~,._""~."_,,,_'''''''''',",_",,",'';i'''i,,,,..''r"::':"'i,.~,~ii:I.t".t";l\';;;;:;;:'i:1;'t':,.t;fwjt~, T.P.-.2. I Soil Description and Classification o j#', . "ri . \4;. . . ~ .- ~o'.'o b.' .'0'.:.' :-.0..0. p,-, o' . . ,0. ^\E'DIU^\ CBJse Tb l)E.W6E. \ G,.,,'Z-A,Y- -5-' '0' .. .Q . o. e:.eo'-.-Jhi ~12t>..:v ELL --( "5AJJ. D \ FE\..J - . ..... C-O~0Lt-S \ 5SCOA\t::"2> A\Ob\ AT <::1< ~-...:;: . ~ l~. . Lt~H-\ ~f2.0\.v',J \ 61L.1'-( SIJ..NDY LDA!\\ ,bE::Y. V' . '0' - '0,0. '. -10 ~ 0. .0' .. . . 0' "0 T.D.= 101 Notes: T. p., I Soil D05uiption and C!ouificotion o _i, -5- .' , ~ -10- ;': NOt05 : \~t:5LEY 5kt/\E12--rON 0 LL\r~ \~ \JA.S~l ~91oJ Cascade Testing Laboratory, Inc. Engineers Geologists 14120 N. E. 21st Street Bellevue. Wash 98007 Phone 641-2573 DATE 8 - 2(0 - 8 ( I CERr. ~~o. 815 - (059 DWN BY Pt4E:.C.t>.N I CHKD BY If . J. '. d.e f UriS ICllon 0 ____ . s-ct ,5- - D -' - 'GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST Based on 1976 Edition of the Uniform Building Code Owner ..___fj)tA.~_____~~___..__...__________.__.___.,. Plan Check No. .__~____..______..V~luat;on h~'O:.J"~-- J~b Address ....~.--I;)..---..-----..~~..U~se "'h~.<.d."~'__""""h""__"___""" City '__"__~__~___'___________"______h"''''_______' Type of V Al Occupancy D State .. ___LJ../~. -------- -- .----- -- -- --.. ---;fS:r.---------... --. .--. Construction.. ...':':':':....--- --.-- Classification. P. '-'h~'___ Total Allowable Floor Area ---h...9.(L------------. Sq. Ft. Fire Zone No. h__...:__..,___.__..Stories ____m~.h_______..m... ' Basis for Increase ~." Floor Area: .ot~--....tf~QO--...-::..~.:.~.tft"'/&I'~ Floor (Max.) ________.________...._________.._________..._____..... Sq. Ft. Floor (Total) ___________..___._____..._____._____________________.. Sq. Ft. Occupant Load ...7. roo... __.. ___....... m....... h... ___.. ..__... / 1~'1ff ~L:7 1A1t.A" ".~ - - '" Corrections checked below are to e made on plans befor permit is issued. The approval of plans and specifications does not permit the violation of any section of the Building Code, or other City Ordinance or . State Law. GENERAL (c) All openings protected with fire assemblies having a fire.resistive rating of one.and-one. 1. Valuation should be $................... .........~ ........... half (three) hours. (d) Ducts through area separation walls should 2. Show job address on plans. be avoided. If allowed, fire dampers on each side of the wall are required. , 3. Give name of person responsible for plans. 4. Submit fully dimensioned plot plan. 10. A fire.resistive occupancy separation in conform. ance with Table No. 5.B and Section 503 is 5. Give all dimensions on plot plan. required between the AREA LIMITATIONS AND GENERAL -----------..-----......-.....---.......-------- (.............hours) OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS ----------..-.-......----...------...----------- (......h.....hours) 6. Ground elevations should be shown at corners ._-----------------.._----..-._.-.-.....__...... (.........0.. .hou rs) of the building and at changes in ground slope. The ground elevations should be taken at the 11. Horizontal occupancy separations should be sup. lowest point between the exterior wall and a ported with a struc,tural system having equiva. point 5 feet out or at the property line, if lent fire.resistive protection. Section 503 (b). closer. Where the exterior wall is parallel to and 12. The building is limited to ....?-,...........__ stories within 5 feet of a public sidewalk, alley, or other public way, the ground elevations should (.................. feet in height) as a Type.............. be the elevation of the public way. The number structure. Section 507 and Table No. 5.0. of stories in this building cannot be determined ------------------------------------.-------.- ----..._-- ... ------------ until this data is furnished. The total floor area is limited to /b.IIJ'rC..... ----------------------------------_...----... -"-...... ---..... .._h____ 7. square feet. Sections 505 and 506. ,0' ___________________________n______..______.._.______._______________.... 8. Unobstructed yards of .................... feet should 13. A room in which a water closet is located should be maintained on ......................__............ sides be separated from food preparation or storage of the building for area purposes. Section 506. rooms by a tight-fitting door. Section 510. 9. Provide details to show that .............................. .hour area separation walls should comply with Section 505 (c); (a) Extend vertically from the foundation to a point 30 inches above the roof. Total width of all openings limited to 25 per. cent of the wall length in the story under consideration. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 14. . ui!.d.illgsaar.e. not permitted 'O':""-X::5.'e"c.ti'o-tlm02 (a). 15. Roof coverings should be fire retardant. Section 1603 (a) or 1704. Details or specifications complying with Section 3203 (e) are required. Form 200.3 Sheet No.1 of 6 Sheets tit f e Exterior (court) walls wjthin.;r ______ _______ feet of line~ shoJ;!.ld be of ____-f-_~_L__f~J.Jr construction. SectIOn 5- -- --------,.-~ Openings in exterior (court) walls within /0- __ feet of property lines should be proteded I h thre fou hs-hour fire assemblies. Section ------ ~- - ---- ~ Usable space under the first floor except in Group I (J) Occupancies should be enclosed as required in Section 1703. Fire.resistive construction for structural frame elements in the exterior walls should comply with Footnote No. 1 of Table No. 17.A and Section ._________.____________.. See Section 1702 for clarification. Building paper should be applied to exterior walls as specified in Section 1707 (a). Enclosures for floor openings should comply with Table No. 17.A, Section 1706. Details should clearly indicate this. 22. Structural members carrying masonry or con- crete walls in buildings over one story in height should be protected with minimum one.hour fire protection. Section 1708. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 23. Nonabsorbent finish and backing for toilet room walls and floor should conform with Section 1711 (a). 24. Shower stall walls should be finished with a hard, nonabsorbent surface to a height of 6 feet. Section 1711 (d). 25. Doors and panels of shower and bathtub en. closure should comply with Section 1711 (e) to (g). 26. Parapet walls not less than __._____.____.__ inches in height are required. Section 1709. 27. Eave overhangs and similar architectural pro- jections should comply with Section 1710. 28. Projections beyond the exterior wall should con- form with the least restrictive of the following: (a) A point one.third the distance to the proper. ty line from an exterior wall. Section 504 (b). (b) A point one.third the distance from an as. sumed vertical plane located where fire. resistive protection of openings is first re- quired due to location of property. Section 504 (b). 29. Envelope ceilings should satisfy the following conditions [Section 4303 (b) 6.]: (a) Should not be used to provide fire protec. tion beam and girders supporting more than one floor. (b) Columns should be individually fire pro- tected. (c) Duct and outlet openings are limited to 100 square inches in each 100 square feet of ceiling area and should be protected with approved fire dampers. (d) Electrical outlet boxes should be of steel and not greater than 16 square inches in area. 30. GYP~uf!1 board ceilings in conjunction with fire. ~eslstlve assemblies should be supported at Intervals not exceeding 16 inches. Item 25, Table No. 43.C. . e 31. Wood stripping or suspended wood systems for gypsum board ceilings should be not less than 2.inch nominal thickness. Section 4704 (b). [Section 4703 (b) for wall stripping.] 32. Final partition layouts and details should be sub- mitted prior to installation to justify compli- ance with occupancy, fire.resistive, structural, and exit requirements. 33. Justifying test data in conformance with Section 106 or an ICBO research recommendation is required for _______________________________.__........_...._.___... 34. Rooms in which rubbish (linen) chutes terminate should be separated from the remainder of the building with a one.hour occupancy separation. Section 1706 (c). 35. Openings into rubbish and 'linen chutes should not be located in required exit corridors or stairways. Section 1706 (c). SPECIAL OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS Group A 36. A.3 Occupancies should be of one.hour fire. resistive construction if located in a basement or above the first story. Section 702 (b). ----- 37. A.2.1 Occupancies with an occupant load of 1000 or more should be in Type I, II.F.R., II one.hour, III one-hour or IV one.hour build. ings. The assembly room should not be in a basement if it contains this high occupant load. Section 702 (b). 38. The main entrance should front directly upon or have a 20.foot wide access to a public ,way at least 20 feet in width. Section 703. 39. Light and ventilation should comply with Section 705. 40. A One.Hour Fire-Resistive Occupancy Separation is required between the boiler or central heat- ing plant and the rest of the building. Section 708. 41. Exterior openings for rooms containing a boiler or central heating plant should be protected with three.fourths.hour fire.resistive assemblies that are fixed, automatic, or self.closing if 10' cated below openings in another story or if less than 10 feet from other doors or windows in the same building. Section 708. Group E 42. Atmospheric separations should comply with Section 802 (b). 43. Use of rooms should be clarified. Note that rooms in Divisions 1 and 2 Occupancies used for day care purposes and rooms used for kindergarten, first, or second grade pupils and Division 3 Occupancies cannot be located above the first story. Section 802 (c). 44. Special hazard rooms should be separated from other portions of the building by not less than a One.Hour Fire.Resistive Occupancy separa. tion. Section 802 (d). 45. One required exit should front directly upon, or have a 20.foot wide access to, a public way at least 20 feet in width. Section 803. 46. Sanitary facilities should be provided in accord. ance with Section 805. 47. Light and ventilation should comply with Section 805. Sheet NO.2 of 6 Sheets . e 48. A One-Hour Fire-Resistive Occupancy Separation is required between the boiler or central heat- ing plant and the rest of the building. Section 808. Group I 49. Group I, Division 1 Occupancies should be of Type I or Type II-F.R. construction unless com- plying with the Exception in Section 902 (b). 50. Group I, Division 1 (2) Occupancies should be of one-hour fire-resistive construction. Table No.5-C. 51. Light and ventilation should comply with Section 905. 52. A One-Hour Fire-Resistive Occupancy Separation is required between the boiler or central heat- ing plant and the rest of the building. Section 908. 53. Exterior openings for rooms containing a boiler or central heating plant should be protected with three-fourths-hour fire-resistive assemblies that are fixed, automatic, or self-closing if located below openings in another story or if less than 10 feet from other doors or windows in the same building. Section 908_ Group 8 54. Motor vehicle service stations should be of non- combustible fire-retardant treated wood or one- hour fire-resistive construction. Section 1102 (b). 55. Storage areas in excess of 1000 square feet in connection with wholesale or retail sales should be separated from the public areas by a One- Hour Fire-Resistive Occupancy Separation un- less the building is equipped throughout with an automatic fire.extinguishing system. Section 1102 (b). 56. Light and ventilation should comply with Section 1105. 57. Exhaust ventilation at or near floor level is re- quired by Section 1105. 58. A One-Hour Fire-Resistive Occupancy Separation is required between a boiler room or central heating plant and the rest of the building. Sec- tion 1108. Group R-I 59. A Group H Occupancy more than two stories in height or having more than 3000 square feet above the first story should be of one-hour fi re-resistive construction throughout. Section 1302 (b). 60. The following rooms should have window areas as specified in Section 1305 (a), one-half of which is openable. ---------------.---...".----.......-............---.....----------......-- ---.-....--..............__....._---------------..-.....--------------.... ------------....--......._-_...._------------.--..-.-.....--.--------..... 61. Mechanical ventilating system in bathrooms should provide five air changes per hour di- rectly to the outside. Section 1305 (a). 62. Windows from .________________.._____...______________. should not be considered as furnishing required light or ventilation since they do not open to a yard, court, or street in accordance with Section 1305 (a). 63. Courts bounded on four sides with walls should be at least 10 feet in length. For courts more than two stories in height, the required width should be increased by one foot and the re- quired length by 2 feet for each additional story. Section 1306 (c). . e 64. Every sleeping room' below the fourth floor should have at least one window or exterior door approved for emergency exit or rescue. Section 1304. 65. ....________.._________n......n__nnnn.._h__...h_ room should have the minimum ceiling height required in Section 1307 (a). 66. ____n____n_nnn___.........nn_n_n__............. room should have a minimum su perficia I floor area of ...n__n_____n____ square feet. Section 1307 (b). 67. Efficiency dwelling units should comply with Section 1308. 68. A One-Hour Fire-Resistive Occupancy Separation is req u ired between a boiler room or central heating plant and the rest of the building. Section 1312. 69. Every dwelling unit and guest room should have comfort heating facilities as specified in Sec- tion 1311. Group M 70. Group M Division 1 Occupancies are limited .to 1000 (3000) square feet in floor area and one story in height. Section 1502. 71. Garages should not open directly into a room used for sleeping purposes. Section 1504. 72. An approved noncombustible material or asphal- tic paving material is required for garage floor surfaces. Section 1504. EXIT REQUIREMENTS 73. An occupant load sign is required in classrooms, assembly areas, etc., having an occupant load' of more than 50. Section 3301 (j). See ____........ 74. Conforming exits are required from the areas below as specified in Section 3302 (a). 75. Exits should have a minimum separation of one- half the maximum overall diagonal of the build- ing or area served. Section 3302 (c). __......n____ 76. No point in the building should be more than 150 (200) feet from an exterior exit, horizontal exit, enclosed stairway, or exit passageway, measured in the direction of travel. Section 3302 (d). __________._.........._........_._______....._......_n_ Exit door should swing in the direction of egress. Section 3303 (b). See doors .__nnh_______ -tt.- n_ ---n----nu?J?~R__E~r~_ --,.,t;:!-l------.. 78. Double acting doors are not allowed where serv- ing a tributary occupant load of more than 100. Section 3303 (b). 79. Exit doors should be openable from the inside without the use of a key, special knowledge, or effort. Section 3303 (c). Note also that flush bolts or surface bolts are prohibited. 80. Exit doors should be a minimum size of 3' x 6'8" with a minimum door swing of 90 degrees. Section 3303 (d). ..___..___ _......_____n___.._ _____nn__n 81. The net dimension (clear width) at doorways should be used in determining exit widths required by Section 3302 (b). Section 3303 (d). In consideration of door thicknesses, panic hardware, door swing, etc., the required exit widths have not been furnished. See door Sheet No.3 of 6 Sheets ~, 99. " e 82. A floor or landing not more than 1 inch below the threshold is required o'n each side of an exit door. Section 3303 (h). Doors should not project more than 7 inches in- to the required corridor width when fully opened or more than one-half into the required corridor width when in any position. Section 3304 (d). mm___.______mm.mm._____.m._ _...._ ____.. _.m Revolving (sliding) (overhead) doors are not per- mitted as exit doors. Section 3303 (f). Exit doors should provide immediate access to an appr~lVed means of egress. Section 3303 (g). Exiting through another room does not com. ply, except as provided for in Section 3302 (e). Corridors should have a minimum width of 44 inches. Section 3304 (b). Corridors serving nonambulatory persons should have an 8-foot minimum width. Section 3318 (c). 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. Dead end of corridors and exit balconies are limited to 20 "feet. Section 3304 (e). Walls and ceilings of corridors should be of one- hour fire-resistive construction. Section 3304 (g). An architectural section through the corri- dor is necessary to determine how this is accomplished. Exterior exit balconies cannot project into an area where protected openings are required due to location on property. Section 3304 (i). 89. 90. 91. Interior openings irito corridors should be pro- tected as specified in Section 3304 (h). Stairway m.__mm____h..___m____h______m. should have a minimum width of ____h____..h.__... inches. Trim and handrails should not project more than 31h inches into the required width. Section 3305 (b). Risers on stairways should not exceed 71h inches and runs should not be less than 10 inches. Section 3305 (c). Landings on stairways should have a dimension in the direction of travel equal to the width of the stairway but need not exceed 4 feet. Sec- tion 3305 (g). Landings should not be reduced in width more than 31h inches by a door when fully open. Section 3305 (g). Basement portion of stairways should have an approved barrier where continuous to upper floors in an exit enclosure. Section 3305 (h). Vertical distances between stairway landings 'are limited to 12 feet. Section 3305 (i). Handrails should be placed not less than 30 inches nor more than 34 inches above the tread. Section 3305 (D. Two handrails are re- I quired where stairways exceed 44 inches in width. Guardrails for stairs, balconies, and landings should conform with Section 1716. Note that maximum clearance between intermediate rails is 9 inches. Openings in exterior walls within 10 feet of exterior. stairways should be protected with self-closing three.fourths-hour fire-resistive as- semblies. Section 3305 (J). Enclosed usable space under interior stairways shou.ld be protected on the enclosed side as r~qUlred for one-hour fire-resistive construc- tIOn. Section 3305 (m). Noncombustible exterior stairs are required. S~ction 3305 (n). 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 100. 101. 102. Sheet No.4 of 6 Sheets . e 103. Exterior stairs should not project into an area (yards or courts) where wall openings must be protected. Section 3305 (n). One stairway should extend to the roof. Section 3305 (0). It must be in a smokeproof enclosure in buildings over 75 feet in height. Section 3309 (b). Six-foot 6.inch minimum headroom clearance for stairways should be indicated on plans. Section 3305 (p). Note that this is from a plane tangent to the stairway tread nosings. Ramp slopes should not exceed one foot in ....____h__hh______....______ feet. Section 3306 (c) (d). 104. 105. 106. 107. Surface of ramps should be roughened or of a nonslip material. Section 3306 (f). Stairways should be enclosed as specified in Section 3308. (a) One (two)-hour fire-resistive walls are reo quired. . (b) Only exit doors are allowed to open into exit enclosures. (c) Doors should be labeled one (one-and-one- half)-hour fire assemblies. (d) Exit enclosures should include a corridor on the ground floor extending to the exterior. Fire-resistive construction should be as re- quired for the exit enclosure, including pro- tected openings. Only exit doors are per- mitted to open into the corridor. (e) An approved barrier is required at the ground floor to prevent people from acci- dentally continuing to the lower level. (f) Usable space is not allowed under the stairs. 108. 109. One exit from the building should be a smoke- proof enclosure complying with Section 3309. Openings into exit courts less than 10 feet wide should be protected with labeled 45-minute fire assemblies. Section 3310 (d). Also see "exit court" definition in Section 3301 (c). Openings more than 10 feet above the court floor are exempt. No openings other than required exits are per- mitted in exit passageways. The passageways should be of ______m..m____...._. -hour fire-resistive construction. Se<;tion 3311 (a). Exit illumination and signs should be provided in conformance with Section 3312. Aisle (cross aisle) in auditorium should have a minimum width of __..________.mm.__hh_._.. Section 3313 (b). Section 3313 (e). Panic hardware is required on exit doors serving Group A Occupancies having an occupant load of more than 100. Section 3316 (a). In lieu of this, doors shall have no locks or latches. Main and side exits in conformance with Sec- tion 3315 are required for B-2 (1) Occupancies. Section 3316 (a). Corridors of Group E Occupancies should have a width required by Section 3302 plus 2 feet, but not less than 6 feet. Section 3317 (e). Each floor above or below the ground floor level of Group E Occupancies should have no less than two exit stairs. Section 3317 (g). Exit stairs serving an occupant load of more than 100 in a Group E Occupancy should have a minimum clear width of 5 feet. Section 3317 (g). 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. Every room with an occupant load exceeding 300 should have one of its exits into a separate exit system. Section 3317 (b). - e 120. When three or more exits are required, no more than two required exits should exit into the same exit system. Section 3317 (b). 121. No point in a room in a building should be more than 75 feet to an exit corridor, enclosed stair- way or exterior of the building. Section 3317 (c). 122. Exiting through adjoining rooms should comply with Section 3317 (d). 123. Panic hardware is required on exit doors serving rooms containing more than 100 occupants and in corridors of Group E Occupancies. Sec- tion 3317 (j). 124. All required exterior exit doors in a Group I Oc- cupancy shall open in direction of exit travel. Section 3318 (a). 125. Doors from bedrooms and wards of Group I Occupancies and all exit openings where non- ambulatory patients are housed should have a minimum clear width of 44 inches. No pro- jections in this width are allowed. Section 3318 (b). 126. Panic hardware is required on exit doors serving more than 50 occupants in Group I Occupan- cies unless there is no latch or lock. Section 3318 (f). . FLOOR, ROOF CONSTRUCTION, COVERING, SKYLIGHTS, ROOF STRUCTURES 127. The space between wood floor construction and a suspended ceiling below should be divided into areas not exceeding 1000 square feet. Section 2517 (f). ~ 128. Attics of combustible material should be divided into areas not exceeding 3000 (9000) square feet. Section 3205 (b). 129. Roof drainage should be conducted under the public sidewalk. Section 3207 (e). 130. Overflow drains having the same size as roof drains and on independent drain lines are re- quired. In lieu of this, overflow scuppers three times the size of roof drains should be installed in parapet walls. Overflow system should have inlets located 2 inches above the low points of the roof. Section 3207 (c). 131. The aggregate area of penthouses and other roof structures cannot exceed 331h percent of the supporting roof area. Section 3601 (b). FIRE-EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM 132. A.n approved automatic fire-extinguis~ing sy~tem In the ___________________________________________. IS required. Section 3802 (b). This includes blind spaces enclosed wholly or partly by combustible con- struction. 133. Dry standpipes are required in buildings four or more stories in height. Section 3803. 134. Wet standpipes are required as specified in Sec- tion 3804. 135. Combination standpipes are required in build-' ings exeeding 150 feet in height. Section 3805 (b). 136. Buildings six stories or more in height should be provided with not less than one standpipe dur- ing construction. Section 3806 (b). 137. Fire-extinguishing system plans should be sub- mitted to you to determine compliance with applicable building, plumbing, and fire codes. . e FIREPLACES AND CHIMNEYS 138. Chimneys should comply with Sections 3703 and 3704. 139. Fireplaces and barbecues should comply with Section 3707. FINISH WORK 140. The interior wall and ceiling finishes should be specified and comply with Table No. 42-B and Section 4203. . 141. Gypsum wallboard (interior lath and plaster) cannot be installed on weather-exposed sur- faces. Sections 4705, 1711. See Section 424 for definition of weather exposed surface. 142. Skylights should comply with Chapter 34. Plastic skylights are allowed only under the conditions specified in Section 5205. 143. Glass and glazing should comply with Chapter 54. Type and thickness of glass should be specified. 144. Glass and glazing subject to human impact should comply with Section 5406. STRUCTURAL 145. Special inspection in conformance with Section 305 is required. 146. Soil classification in conformance with Table No. 29-8 and ._____..__..___.____.____.__ pounds per square foot soil bearing value used in design should be specified on plans. Section 2905 (a). X -147. The foundation investigation report mentioned in plans was not included in data forwarded to us. It should be submitted for review. 148. All masonry or concrete elements resisting seis- mic forces should qualify as reinforced ele- ments. Section 2312 (j) 28. 149. Precast concrete wall panels are limited to an hIt ratio of 36 (25). Section 2616 (c). 150. Wood members may support loads from ma- sonry or concrete only under the conditions specified in Section 2516 (a). 151. Structu ra I calculations should be submitted to justify the adequacy of the structural system in resisting seismic and wind loads, and sup- porting dead and live loads. This includes foundations. 152. Justifying calculations and details should be pro- vided for. ______________. h__'" ___ __ _ _____ _ ___ _____. ________..______ ......------------------------------.---..---..----.-...-.....-....-.....- 153. Roofs shall be designed for snow loads of _____________________. pounds per square foot. Section 2305 (d). 154. The roof should be designed for uplift wind pres- sures with due consideration for lateral support of compression flanges of flexural members. 155. Floor load should consider a 20-pound per square foot partition load. Section 2304 (d). IX 156. Marquees should be designed for a 60-pound per square foot live load. Table No. 23-A. / , Sheet No.5 of 6 Sheets . -I' ~: e K 157. Garages for the storage of private pleasure cars should be designed for a minimum 2000-pound wheel load. Section 2304 (c). 158. Live load reductions should comply with Sec. tion 2306. 159. Glued-laminated lumber should be fabricated in accordance with Section 2511 (f). 160. Allowable stress in glued-laminated members over 12 inches in depth should consider a depth reduction factor. Section 2511 (d) 6. 161. Bolted connections exposed to the weather are limited to 75 percent of the allowable load under protected conditions. Where always wet, the allowable load shall be 67 percent of the allowable load under protected conditions. U.B.C. Standard No. 25.17. 162.' Anchorage of concrete and masonry walls should comply with Section 2310. . 163~ Plywood grades should conform with Table No. 25-B. 164. Justification is required that sufficient slope or camber is available to assure adequate roof drainage after long time deflections. In lieu of this, roofs must be designed for possible pond- ing of water. Section 2305 (f). 165. Details on stressing method and hardware along with justifying data are required on prestressed concrete work. This data should be submitted and approved prior to ordering of material. Note that all tendons should comply with Sec- tion 4303 (c) 3, for fire.resistive purposes. 166. Welding data or details for steel decking used as a diaphragm should be provided. Information should comply with a specific ICBO research recommendation or test data submitted in compliance with Section 106. Additional Corrections: . e 167. Details should be provided on roof (floor) dia- phragm connections that indicate how the shears are transferred to vertical shear.resist- ing elements. Connections should be justified with structural calculations for compliance with allowable values. 168. Nailing for gypsum board (lath, sheathing board) used structurally on shear walls should be specified to comply with Table No. 47-1. 169. Shear walls utilizing gypsum board (lath, sheath. ing board) cannot be used to resist loads im. posed by masonry or concrete walls. Footnote 1, Table No. 47.1. 170. Railings should be designed to withstand a 20 (50) pound per foot horizontal force. Table No. 23.B. 171. Ceiling framing should be designed for total load of not less than 10 (20) pounds per square foot. Table No. 23.B. 172. Interior partitions should be justified structurally for strength and deflection criteria specified in Section 2312 (b). 173. .hh....hhhhhhhhhnm.nhhh.h...mn should comply with a specific ICBO research recommendation or justifying test data should be submitted in compliance with Section 106. 174. Plans should indicate' that foundations extend below the frost line. 175. Provide complete specification in conformance with the design for .mh_.m._.m__...........mh..__...._ These sheets are a part of the plans and shall remain attached thereto. Corrections as above indicated will be complied with. Rechecked a nd Approved .. h..h h' h. h' __.... ..._... __... ...___ __ __.. __.. .__h. h...m... "h"_ (Sign Here) __ __ h... __...... .h..... ...... h..h ...h'h.h..... ..m..m..,.hm...h (Signature of Owner or Applicant) Date ...................._......................__._..._._..__._..__._..._.._.. Checked by.... .... ...... ......h. ._.... n.... n.'" ._.... ...... ..._... ._.__._.. ._._.___, Date ...__._..__..........._........................................h..........__._..__.____ Sheet No.6 of 6 Sheets ~ 0, 1'[))~UG' . 2333 WHEATON 206-479-6120 WE~KS AtCH~iEC1f WAY BREMERTON WN 98310 November 12, 1981 Heat loss through walls for Bremerton Chest Clinic All ceilings and floors exposed to the exterior have an "H" value of 30 which meets the energy code. TOTAL \'lALL AHEA Framed area @ 75% Glass area @ 25% 7003 Sq. Ft. 5253 Sq. Ft. 1750 Sq. Ft. Heat loss'in Btuh == (AREA)X(U)X(LT) Framed area @ R-ll == U of .09 Glass-tw~n glazed == U of .69 Assume.6T == 250 3/8" alr space Framed area-(5253 sq. ft.) Glass area -(1750 sq. ft.) Total heat loss allowable ( . 09) ( . 69) (25"') = 11819 Btuh (250) ~ 30187 Btuh 42006 Btuh Proposed framed area @ R-19 == U of .053 == 5442 sq. ft. Proposed glass area @ U of .69 == 1561 sq. ft. (5442 sq. ft. ) ( . 053) ( 250 ) == 7211 (1561 sq. ft.) ( .69) (25'" ) == 26927 Actual heat loss through walls of proposed building == 34138 Btuh .. .. . " e . CITY OF BREME~TON e Date _ __ _ _ h _ __ _//-:::__:T".~ _ ~_ _ h_ _ _ _h__ Inter-office Communication To _h_____,dh___/..(If~__ ----------------------------------------------- From _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J71'1_ _ _ h _ _ _ll!i?t:Blt,&:t(_ __ h ______ _ __ _ __ ____ _ _____ Subject ___h______________ ---------------------------------------------------- SoTcJ If M .L1/1/E Wi L C /VGGD "/0 /""'0 ''I L;r 'TO MA-N;Iot. E 1/11 d I<. P <:512.. 'TO G-5T E /I/O U C--(-{ FALL~ /1 L-S () 5 ccve K .?IIVE / S 9(/65 r,-ro/l/ A e~ e AS 10 /J~c!-c5S I~ /V1/!rlV ,A //1/6: .- A \ V-.€e- '->-' t -n..-, --.1.,- "'" . " ~ ..... . . MAYOR AND COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH N!D SAFETY COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING CiTY CLERK AND PURCHASING AGENT November 163 1981 PLAN RE'VIH1: 1225 Campbell vlay; BREl1K9TCW CHEST CLINIC 1. Hydrant must be instaUed pl->ior to any construction as pN' comments of ? /27 /81 -1;0 PZanm',ng Depart-ment, 2. Install F-il"e alarm system as per 1977 Pire AZarm Code; pZans to be submitted for approval. 3. AppCl1~ent occupant load calls .for exi,t doors to SZJ1:n(T 1,{1 the c!il'ection of egl'ess. 4. No door schedule 'is shozJn on plans. 5. ElectricaZ; exit Zights3 emergency l'ighting3' etc? - not shou,'ri1! 6. S'ite must be kept clean and a dwnstel" pl'lovided. Burning of SC1"ap building matej"ials ,is p'ohibited. 1.?~~, ~~~ ~ c5' ;;;;! S-.&. ___~~.~ /' /~~--r~'r------. ,'-,.---- ~:..---- I. .-~. .. ..,.... HOME OF THE PUGET SOUND NAVAL BASE AND SHIPYARD " a ., .. . CIT~ OF B'REM'E~TON . . . Date __________..__L?~____?.._... g I . ----.---.----------..--...------.--.--... Inter-office Communication To __.______.__.~...__..__..______.__...__..____. . fit .----.----.----. ------- From .--.------ __. .a.M1------- / n--------.--------- SUbjectmnuu.uuuu\J~~-e4Jn~m~u~utv, d/~,~7U7f:7:ZJi2~ ~zt7~ {)~,/I1k ;,I1W-CDr:; ~!!" &u-f .A-.n~ ~ ~ 7:.h ", V J! /U(-Wi MkI. ~ ~CA~~~~~~~JW~ ~. ~~7-J~~;tLf-~-~ J,Ji:! f)~~ P~3~-=---------