Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/03/74 CITY COUNCIL ~L'i'ING APRIL 3, 1974 The ~egulap meeting of the City Council of the City of hreme~ton, WashingTon, was held in the Coun- cil Chambers of City }{all at 9:00 a.m., PDST, Wednesdays April 3, 197~. Attending were: Mayor Ja~stad, p~esiding; Con~nissioner Ste~_~t~ CoJ¥/,{ssioner Sehoneman, City Clerk Yeadon: Asst. City Attorney Jackson, and representatives of the press and radio. Meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation by Rev. Soule of Manette Con~m~nity Church. M-~-6-tes of Ma~ch 27, 197~ were read and approved as amended. NOTICES OF EMPIDYMIi%T Kerry ~blmes Whiteside, Pa~king Garage Attendant, $2.25 Pm., April 3, 1974. Pauline Ivy Schwendemann~ PT Playleader, Pml~ks Dept., $3,05 h~., April 3, 1974. Ruth Shedwin, Extra Help~ Public W6rks Co,,~.{ssioner, $2.47 hp.~ April ~, 197~. Jonl Dawkins, Extra Help, Finance Co~lnissione~, $~.B7 h~. ~ April 1, 1974. ~btion by Cx)m~tissioner Schoneman and Co~i,~ssioner Stewal-t to approve the employra~nts, carried unan- ~-6~fy. CHANGES IN PAY STATUS Kenneth B~ees, Engineering Aide II, $780 to $790, April 1, 1974, End of Probation. Clerk read memo dated April 1, 1974, from City Engineer to City Council stating~ M~. B~ees has com- pleted his six-month probationary period in a very satisfactory manner, and recon~nending approval of pay increase. Motion by Commissioner Schoneman and C~,,,.~ssioner Stewart to approve the change in pay status, ear~ied unanimously. PAYROLL VOUCHER Clerk presented Payroll Vouche~ for the pay period March 10th through Mar~h 23~ 197~ in the amount of $1~3,122.32; which was audited by I-~l~old Fitz%~ter and approved by Commissioner Stewart. Motion by Commissioner Stewar~ and Mayom Japstad to approve the payroll voucher~ carried unanimously. APPLICATION FOR TAXICAB DRIVER LICENSE Clerk presented application for Taxicab D~iver License from Harold W. Julian which was approved by Captain Dever¥ for the Chief of Pollce. Motion by Con~nissione~ Stewart and Mayor Jar~tad to approve the application, car~ed unanimously. LICENSE APPLICATION - ART SHOW (AM~ED FORCES DAY) City Clerk presented Application for license to hold an a~t show on the City street du/~ing Ar~ed Forces Day, signed by Sharon Hill. Mayor Ja~stad explained that the Ar~c Show is usually held in the City Hall Park; however, this would bring the show closer to the activities of Ar~ed For~es Day. City CLerk noted that the application s~uld be approved contingent on filing of proper insurance bonds. Application approved by Chief of Police. [.~tion by Mayor Ja~stad and Co,~,~ssioner Stewart to approve the license application contingent on ~ling insua-anee ~equi/~en~nts, carried unanimously. CLAIM FOR D~iAGES - BELMONT TERRACE Clerk presented Claim for Damages from Belmont Terrace, Inc. ~ in the amount of $15.75, and stated this would be refer~ed to the City's insurance eu,!~any. CLAIM FOR D;~AGES - VICKI TURNER, GLENN LUND, INA RANSOM, ELITABLTH DECOTEAU Clerk presented Claim for ~nages from the following: Vieki Tu/v~r, Amount $25,000, referTed to insurance Company; Glenn Lund~ $50,000~ to he refers-ed to insurance company; Ina Mae Ranscm~ $25,000, to be refer~ed to insurance c~p~ny; Elizabeth Decoteau~ $50,000~ to be refer~ed to insur- ance company. City Clerk stated that these claims will be refer~ed to False Arrest Insttrance Car~iel~. Mayor Ja~stad gave background on Claims. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - RANDY SARGENT Clerk presented Claim for ~amages fl~m Randy Sargent in the amount of $79.~, and stated this would ~ refer~ed to City's insurance company. SURPLUS IT!~S - STPe2:I' DEPARTMIiNT ~lerk read memo dated April 1~ 1974, from Street Superintendent to Commissioner Schoneman requesting the following items be declared surplus: (1) Gallion Rolle~, 19~, Model 2578138024; (2) Athey IDader, 19~5, Model S/M21115; (3) Rock Crusher, 1950; (4) Gravel Screen Plant, 19~5; (5) C~npactor- Sheeps Foot, 1965; (6) Pulva Mixer, 19~7; (7) Wheel Packer, 1945; (8) 19~7 Caterpillar. ~tion by C~',~,gssioner Schoneman and Commissioner Stewar~ to declare the items surplus to be dis- Dosed of in the best interest of the City. Oommissioner Schoneman stated that the Pa~k Depsx,t,~mnt ~3y be interested in acquiring the 19~7 Cater~illal-. Mr. Schoneman stated the sul~plused Water Supply Fire T~uck might also be l-pansfer~ed to the Pa~k Deparivnent to use as recreational equipment for the children. City Clerk stated he would w~ite a memorandum to the Park Superintendent to look into these matters. Motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, April 3, 197~ ~ Continued BID AWARD - SURPLUS PROPERTY (}KGHLAND AVE~3E) Clerk stated that only bid received was from Ronald Asleson, and this bid was at the minimum price to be accepted. Con,missioner Schoneman stated that this property serves no use to the City, and should be back on the tax rolls. Motion by C~ssioner Schonenan and Mayor Jarstad to accept the bid, and to direct the City Attor- ney to prepare the necessary resolution which would state the fair market value and other terms and conditions of the sale. (bmmissloner Stewart stated he felt the appraisal fee of $100 was too costly for this vacant lot; that he didn't see why a MAI ~praiser was necessary in this instance. Asst. City Attorney Jackson stated that MAI Ap_~raisers a~e used for the protection of the City due to the possibility of these appraisals going to Court ;also, stated that this is standard procedure throughout the state and a reeu,ul~ndation of the Association of Washington Cities. Co',m.{ssioner Schoneman noted that the appraisal fees were included when determining minimum price. Motion carried unanimously. BID AWARD - WATER WORKS MATERIALS Clerk stated that Council previously awarded three items on Water Works Materials to low bidder{ Crane Company; however, it is the conclusion of the Water Depar, t,~nt to ~m~nd this award and give these three items to second low bidder, 1'1'1' Grinnell Corporation. Explained that Crane Company does not feel they should furnish these thr~e items because they understood the award would be based on lowest schedules, not lowest items. City Clerk stated that specifications did not reflect how the award would be determined. Stated that Crane Ccmpany does not want to suDply the three lowest items of an entire scheduler and a study of their proposal indicates that they probably bid according to schedules. Motion by Conmissioner Schoneman and Con, missioner Stewart to concur with recommendation of the Water 'Dep~'.b.ent, carried unanimously. BID /~ARD - CULVERT PIPE Clerk read memo dated April 1, 1974, from City Clerk to City Council stating he has discussed the only bid (North Kitsap Gravel g Asphalt Con,any) with Watem Supply Fore~n~ and they reconraend award of this bid which is well below estimate. Motion by Conmlissioner SchOneman and Mayor Jarstad to award bid to North Kitsap Gravel g Asphalt Cbmpany as recon~nanded, carried unanimously. WATER MAIN CONNECTION - ARSENAL WAY g KITSAP WAY Clerk mead memo dated April 3, 1974, from E.R. Weller to Co,..~ssioner Schoneman ~equesting author~ ization to install a 12-inch connection at Amsenal Way and Kitsap Way; that this would connect the existing 12-inch main on Kitsap Way with the 12-inch main installed in conjunction with the relo- cation of the ten-inch main made necessary by the building of the ~$tpark freeway. Estimated cost, $6,500.00. Motion by Commissioner Sehoneman and Cxmmtissioner Stewart to authcmize the work to be done by Work o~e Account, carmied unanimously. BID AWARD - CO~MUNICATIONS CENTER ROOM (REMODELING/ALT~{ATIONS) POLICE DEPT. Clerk read memo dated April 1, 1974, from Chief Schlie to City COuncil, mequesting subject bid award be made to Con~ereial Builders, low bidder. - ~{otion bV ~l~yor Jarstad and Co~ssioner Stewal~t to award bid to Comnereial Builders as reccmmended Conrais~ioner Stewart asked if proper funding is provided, and City Clerk stated he would cheek into the source of lundinq. Motion was ~nended to read as follows: Motion by Mayor Jarstad and Commissioner Stewar~ to award bid to Commercial Builders as reco~,~nded s--~-~t to loeatlon of funds, carried unanimously. CALL FOR BIDS - FIRE ALARM/COP~fONICATIONS CABLE Clerk read men~ dated Mar~h 27~ 1974, from 0ommunications Supervisor to City Council requesting authorization to call for bids for a Fire Alarm/Cor~nunications Cable, as authorized in 197~ Budget. Motion by Mayor Jarstad and C~m.{ssioner Schoneman to authorize ~he bid ca]] , carried unanimously. CALL FOR BIDS - TRUCKS/AIR CCMPRESSOR (STR~ffI' DEPARTMENT) Clerk read memo dated April 1, 197~, f~om Street Depa~O~,ent to Commissioner Schoneman requesting authorization to call for bids for one 1-ton truck, one 1/2 ton truck, and one Air Ccmpressor com- plete with hose and hammer. Commissioner Sehoneman stated that funding is provided in the budget. ~btion by Cx~maissioner $choneman and Mayor Jarstad to authorize the bid call, carried unanimously. CA iL FOR BIDS - SIRENS ~ BEACONS Clerk read memo dated Mar~h 27, 1974, from Dave Patroon, Communications Supervisor to City Council, requesting authorization to call for bids for the purchase of sirens and beacons to be installed at selected traffic signal intersections to aid the flow of emergency vehicles, as authorized in 1974 budg~et. Motion by Mayor Jarstad and C~m[ssioner Stewart to authorize bid call, carried unanimously. PURCHASE UNDER STATE CONTRACT - TWO-WAY RADIO (FIRE DEPT. ) Clerk presented Requisition for one two-way radio and equf~ent to be purchased under State contract from RCA Mobile Cc~,,,m~nications for the Fire Depa~'.b~ent; amount, $1173.76. Motion by Mayor Jarstad and Con~nissioner Schoneman to approve the purchase under State contract, carried unanimously. CITY OJJNCIL MINlrfES, April 3, 197~, Continued 0(IrSIDE UTILITY ~ - RULON HEAD Clerk explained that Application fop Outside Utility Agreement was filed about a year ago, and held up pending the outcome of the Sheridan Heights Annewation Election which was not held. City Clerk stated that Mr. Head said the ground does not percolate properly for his septic tank, and this causes the water to go to the lower level inside ~he City Limits. Con,,{ssionezTM Schoneman stated that other Utility Agreements have been made in this a~ea: including Ba~.zy B~anch's Agreement. M~. $choneman stated that the City should withhold any Additiom~R1 Outside Utility ~reements fo~ new construction; however this Application was held hack on the basis of possible annexation. Motion by Commissioner Schen~nan and Mayor Ja~stad to approve the Outside Utility Agreement. ~sioner Stewart noted that this would add mo~e sewage to an overloaded p~np station. Stated the City is discharging sewage into the Puget Sound~ and some type of plan should be imple~nented to solve this problem. Ma-. Stewal~t stated that charges of Outside Utility Agreements are not pay- inK the costs involved; that this ~ate should be adjusted or the City will be putting_, a financial burden on those persons within City LJmlits. Cux~,~ssioner Schoneman stated that plans have been prepared, and the Finance Cu~,.~ssioner can assist in obtaining funds for the improvements. Motion carried unanimously. OUTSIDE UTILITY AGREtMENT - DOUGLAS GIBBONS Clerk read memo dated Mal~eh 27, 1974, f~om City Engineer to C~]~x~issionel~ Stewart, advising that both Gibbons and Head Properties would go through the ss~ne overloaded pump station that the sewage fr~m the Branch p~ope~ty will flow through. Clerk presented Outside Utility Agreement and Application f~mm Douglas Gibbons at 118 Sheridan Road. ~otion by Cu,,,;ssioner Schoneman and Mayom JaPstad to approve the Agreement. Cu~,~[ssioner Sehoneman explained that several yea~s ago M~. Gibbons gave the city an easement through his property to mi]ow the main sewer trunk line; that he could have connected at that time, but his septic tank was adequate. Stated this application should now be honored. Motion carried unanimous lV. NOTICE OF }~3%RING - KITSAP COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD Clerk presented Notice of Heal"lng of the gitsap County Boundary Review Board regarding the pro- posed Pa~kwood East water main ex'tension. Commissioner Schoneman explained that before an ar~a can connect to a water system, approval must he obtained by the. Boundary Review Board, that althou~h they are connecting ~o the City's system, this matter is beiween the Review Board and Parkwood East. Mm. Schonenan stated that there would be City representation at the meeting. NEW PROJECT PROPOSALS - URBAN ARTERIAL BOARD Clerk read memo dated April 1, 1974, from Urban Az~terial Board to City Council submitting a notice of Urban Arterial Board intention to modify its existing rules concer~ing subnission of new pre- ject proposals to UAB; also, statinz that these revised ~ules will, be considered by the Umban Arterial Board for adoption at its meeting on April 18, 197~. Also to be held, meeting concerning bike routes. ASSOCIATION OF WASH. CITIES ANNUAL CONVSNTION City Clerk read eorTespondence from AWC eoneer~ling Annual Convention dates and submitting Conven- tion hotel reservations. Clerk asked the Con~nissioners if they received this information. Mayor Jarstad directed Clerk to check with Co.,,Jssioners' secretaries to be cel-tain reservations have been made. NOTICE OF CONI'fM~qCE - ASSOCIATION OF WASH. CITIES Clerk presented Notice of AWC Oonfe~ence on "Volunteere in local Gove~'~,,~ent - The Untapped Resoumce", to be held May 8, 1974, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at Seattle's Olympie Hotel. Stated this notice will be distributed. ~ LETTER - CHARLES ULLOCK RE: DtMPS/LANDFILLS Clerk mead lette~ dated Mameh 29~ 197~ from Charles Ullock to City Clerk regalxting his letter wi-il-ten to Council dated Ma~ch 20th, and requesting mo~e detailed answers to his questions in that letter related to dumping and landfills. C~x,,{ssioner Schoneman stated that press has been made in the areas mentioned in M~. Ullock's Ma~ch 20th letter; that one site will be fenced, and the other site (within City ownership) has been reviewed and the City will be reeeivlng a letter fr~m M~. Wiegel of the Health Department. Stated this information will be given to Mm. Ullock. This matter referTed to Cu~,{ssloner Schoneman fop proper answer to M/~. Ullock. LEiTER- C}bMRLES ULLOCK RE: 0Yb'r~ BAY CONTAMINATION Clerk read letter dated Apl~il 2, 197~, from Charles Ullock to City Council relating to contamina- tion of Oyster Bay, and ma~or erosion f~n steep land-cut slopes; also, asking why M~. Skirving is hot honoring, his Agreement with the City relating to his landscape plan of the Oyster Bay Plaz~ Site. Motion by Mayor Jar~tad and C~Jssioner Schoneman to refer the letter ~o the proper depaz.h~mnts for the proper answers to Mr. Ullock's questions, and to provide copies to the C~,,,{ssione~s, carried unanimously. 10: 00 - PUBLIC RECOGNITION Mo one spoke Motion by Mayor Ja~stad and Commissioner $choneman to hold hea~ings as scheduled on the agenda, ca~ie d unanimously. CITY ODUNCIL MINUTES, A~ril 3, 1974, Continued }~J~RING - STEG~EYER APPEAL - SPECIAL USE PE~rlT - RADIO ~ TOWER City Clerk stated he advertised Notice of Hearing in the newspaper, and posted the property and public places at the p~oper t~me as requi~ed by law. Stated letters of notification were sent to people showing interest in the matter. Clerk stated that this application cc~s to the Council on Appeal of Plannin~.~ Conm%issions Decision. Clerk read Planning. C~,.,ission Resolution No. 253 denying the Special Use Permit fop the following reasons: (1) N~erous c~.plaints of residents and property owners in the neighborhood concemnirk~ television and radio interference, (2) Tower is objectionable because of aesthetic reasons, (3) Mr. Stegemeyer a]ready has an existing tower on adjacent pmope~ty. Clerk read Staff Review dated February 28, 1974, recu~,,~nding approval of Special Use Permit with the condition the Pelm~it he rescinded should the use of the tower not be allowed by other a~encies, or that the structur~ falls into dls~epair or ceases to be used. Clerk read City of Br~me~ton Envirorm~_ntal Impact Assessment concluding that proposed action would be minor and the potential adverse envlrormental impacts are insignificant, and making a negative declaration concernln~ the l~uiPement fop a detailed Envirormental Impact Statement. Clerk read excerpt of Planning Cu,.,{ssion Minutes dated March S, 1974, at which time a motion was passed to deny the ~pecial Use Permit. Clerk read petition signed by 48 persons expressing, opposition to the application for special use permit for a radio antenna tower at 2348 East 18th Street. Clerk presented the following letters, all addressed to the Planning Conmission: (1) Mrs. Madeline Foster, 1731 Nipsic Averse, stating she has no c~,~nt as long as there is no television interfer- ence, (2) Joseph Rayburn, 2320 East 18th Street, objectin~ to the radio antenna tower; (3) Blanche Netterfield, 1809 Nipsle, objecting to ~adio antenna tower; (4) Mm. & Mrs. James Vetch, 2337 East 18th Street, objecting of radio antenna tower; (5) Polly S Stanley Huser, 2338 F~mst 18th Street, objecting to radio antenna tower; (6) James Jones, 1730 Nipsic, objecting to radio antenna tower. Clerk presented Letter of Appeal addressed to Planning Conmission frcm Mr. Stegemeyer dated March 7, 1974. George Plescher~ City Planner, gave presentation to the Council showing general area and location of proposed madio antenna on a map. Cu,,,;ssioneI, Seheneman asked if Mr. Stegemeyer's existinf, tower w~uld be removed. Mr. Plescher stated it would remain; that this is a request for an addi- tional tower. Commissioner Sehoneman asked how Mr. Stegemeyer obtained permission to locate his present tower. Mr. Plescher stated he was granted a Conditional Use Permit in March, 1970. Bruce Harrod, Attorney representing Mr. Stegemeyer, stating that the Planning Commission could not properly deny the application on grounds of television interference; that all c~,,,~nication prob- lems such as this are under jurisdiction of the Federal Co~*nunieatlons Co~nission (FCC). Stated the FCC takes all complaints, and regnlates all transmissions. Stated the City Council has no jur- isdiction in this amea either; that this matter would he handled by the FCC. Mr. Hat,od explained that this additional tower would not brin~ any additional television interference, that ~. Stegem~yer would be operating the s~e nu~r of watts. Stated that Mr. Stegem~yer is per- forming a valid public service, providing co~,~nieation from servicemen overseas, etc. Stated that this application could not be denied for aesthetic reasons; that one person may consider the tower uK1V where another person may not. Stated that many Court cases reveal that denial cannot be given on aesthetic grounds. Mayor Jarstad stated he felt the City Council does have jurisdiction when the situation is of con- cern to the su~.xuunding residents. Mr. Harr~ suggested the matter be referred to the City Attor- ney to determine whether the Council does have jurisdiction. Asst. City Attorney Jackson stated he believed the Council could properly consider location of the tower. ~'~. SteKemeyer ex?lained that the additional tower would not cause any additional interference, and might even improve the situation. Stated he plans to operate whether this permit is issued or not; that the additional tower would eliminate his having to climb the existing tower to change antennas according to conditions. Stated he is willing to help with any interference problems, and will fix televisions and radios at his expense. Stated that other equipment such as tape decks, stereos, organs, are more involved and he is willing to pay half the cost of modification. Co~zulssioner Stewart questioned why the FCC hasn't done anything to eliminate interference caused by the present tower. Mr. Stegemeyer stated he didn't believe any complaints had been registered with the FCC; that if a complaint was issued, he would have been advised of any violations. Mayor Jarstad asked Mm. Stegemeyer why he war~s an additional tower if he can operate with the existing tower. Mr. Stegemeyer stated this would avoid his having to climb up and down the existing tower to meet with changing conditions; that the proposed t~er would be an "alternate" The followin~ persons spoke in opposition to the radio antenna tower: Mrs. }{retold Fischler, 1802 Nipsic Avenue; Mrs. James (Alma) Vetch, 2337 East 18th Street; Pete Walker, 1804 Nipsic Avenue. Main objections of opponents were television and radio interference and aesthetic reasons. CITY COUNCIL MIN~JTES, April 3, 1§74, Continued Mm. Stegemeyer stated the ~esidents in the area could ~m]l him if they have interferences with their television and ~adio equitm~nt, end he could stop operation until a later time. Conmissioner Schoneman stated he could not see why the residents should be required to call Mr. StegemeyeP on a continuous basis. Mayor Japstad stated he ~eeognizes the value of M~. StegemeyeP's excellent hobby; however~ he feels the concerns and testimonies of the neighborhood mesidents a~e valid; al~o~ noted that Mr. Stegemeyer can still continue with his opeDation usinK his existing tc~ep. Motion by Mayor Ja~stad end Commissioner Stewal~t that this request for a Special Use Per~it fop a seco----~n-~tower he denied. Mayor Ja~stad directed the City Attorney to obtain information concerning legal matter of proper jurisdictions to be certain the Council's decision is within the law. Co~nissioner Schoneman stated he felt this neighborhood is strictly residential and another loca- tion would be much more suitable. Motion cal~mied unenimously. Meeting recessed at 11:18 a.m. Called to O~deP 11:27 a.m. BOGGESS/RICHARDSON REZONE HEARING - R-1 T0 R-2 (812 SHERIDAN RD. ) C'le~k stated he published notice of heaping in newspaper, posted the property and public places, mailed letter~ of notification to propel~ty owneps within 250 feet of the proper~y; all at the proper time and as ~equired by law. Clerk read Planning Conmission Resolution No. 252 recommending approval of the rezone subject to the site plen and land use restrictions. Clerk ~ead City of Br~me~ton Environmental Asses~ent making a negative decla~ation in respect to the p~epapation of a detailed ~hvironmental Impact Statement fop the proposed rezone action. Clerk road excePpt of Planning Cc~mission Minutes dated Ma~ch S ~ 1974, at which time a motion was unanimously passed to approve the rezone according to site plan end Land Use Restrictions. Clerk read letter dated February 11, 1974, from Owen B. Tripp to Propel~ty Owners in subject a~ea, exDressin~ his opposition to the rozone end u~ginK them to do the same. George PlescheP, City Planner, showed a~e on land use map and Con~prehensive Plen; also, presented site plen showing 10 building, 80-unit apa~.b,Lent complex. Cx~n~nissioner Stewart asked if this development would be pa~t of the already overloaded sewage pumo station. M~. Papkem explained this is corTeet; however, the number of units involved in the proposed development is no more than the numbel- of duplexes that could be developed under present zoning. PROPONENTS Me~v Richardson, applicent, stated he felt this is en excellent location for the apaz.~uL~nt complex, being close to scbPols, churches, end shopping. Stated this development will only cover 13 peroent of the grounds as opposed to 35 percent if developed into single family residences. Con~nissioner Stewart asked M~. Richardson if he w~s in debt to the City for sewer connections to his develo~nent on T~enton Avenue. Mr. Richardson did not feel this was relevent to the proposed ~ezone. C~n~nissioneP Schoneman gave background of this matter. ~4alteP Hackett, Attorney ~epresenting some residents opposing the rezone, stated the rezone should not be granted until there is a Comprehensive Plen fop the a~ea enticlpating new future growth. Stated a/-ea is predominantly Residential-One. Stated that houses in the a~ea ape on lots larger than the normal size. M~. Haekett stated that the local Elementary School may not be large enough to handle the additional children, and the City should have an impact statement from the School System. Spoke of problems with fire p~otection due to the fact that there is only one foot access. Stated vegetation will have to be r~moved which may oause erosion by the c~eek. ~h~l~nitted picd~ur~s of vegetation in the ar~a. Stated any covenants placed on the land should be made in a very binding mannep fop protection in the case of futupe sale of the comDlex. Stated the rezone ~equest should be either deferred or denied until the Sheridan Pa~k Neighborhood Plan is worked out. Cc~sslonep Schoneman stated that develolm~ent of duplexes could also have some adverse effects also, stated he dldn~t agree that mostly young children would be living in the apa~.O~ents. Bob Dapling, 815 Fast 31st Street, spoke in opposition to the rozone and explained that the residents in the a~ea do not want apa~.l,~nt complexes; that they want to develop their neighborhood the way they would like it. Sheldon ParT, 612 Sheriden Road, spoke in opposition to the rezone, explaining they don't want eny more vegetation r~noved, and want the neighborhood developed in a residential manner. Stated this would cause increased noise pollution as well as destroy the view. CITY OF BRU~ERTON, COUNCIL MINUTES, A~ril 3, 1974, Continued C~lly [~rlinK, 815 Fast 31st Street, objected to the proposed rezone because she didn't want apa~.b,ents in this neighborhood; also, questioned how covenants on the ~ezone would be enforced. Mayor Jarstad stated the covenants ar~ placed on the land, and if not fulfilled, Cour?c action can be taken to enforce fulfillment. IDrna Bouton, 2960 Rickey Road, spoke against the rezone, and explained that a plan should be worked out for the neighborhood. Also complained that this would cause additional noise pollution. Joseph Obrien, 3023 McClain, spoke in opposition to the rezone; that he and his wife do not want this type of development in their neighborhood. Commissioner Schoneman suggested the matter be set aside for answers to the questions regarding sewer facilities and watel- pressure. ,Motion by Co,~nissioner Schoneman and Con~nissionel~ Stewart to set the rezone matter aside in order to study these questions, carried unanimously. REPFf%L RESOI~frION - STATE LAND EXCHANGE (TO TRADE DIFFERENT CITY PARCEL) Clerk explained that Water Supply Supervisor reo~,,~mnds Resolution No. 1527 be repealed in ordem to omit the parcel of land previously approved for transfer with the State ~ and to request approval to transfer another pamcel of land; also~ explained that the parcel previously approved showed future ~ecreational value. M~. Schoneman explained that the first parcel to be treaded was ez~on- eously descPihed, and was never intended for tDade. Motion bv Cc~ssioner Schoneman and Co~missioner Stewart to accept recommendation of the Water Supply Supezxrlsor, carried unanimously. Lwl'rw~< - HIGHWAY COMMISSION RE: DW~o/SALE OF gORPLUS PROPERTY (SR 3 HIGHWAY) Clerk read letter dated Ma~ch 2B, 197N, f~om State Highway Con~ssion to Public Works Cbn~lissioner submittinK Deed conveying surplus proper~y along existing SR $ Highway ~o Roger a~d Nancy Reid, and exDlaininK that this highway was certified to the ~ity ppio~ to sale of the surplus prope~ty~ end the City should also be included on the deed in order to convey all inter~st concerned. Discussion was held as to where the money obtained f~om sale would belong--with the City or with the State, or with both. Motion by Con~tissionep Schoneman and Co~m~issioner Stewar~ to refer this question to the City Attorney's Office to find out where the money would go, tattled unanimously. ORDINANCE - APPROPRIATING FUNDS - WAT~ SUPPLY (HOUGH lOADER) NO. 3120 Clerk ~ead, second reading, An O~dinanee amending Ordinance No. 3101, adopting the Water DeparTment budget of the City of Breme~ton for the year of 197~, as authorized by RCW 35.33.091. Motion by C~,,,Jssioner Schoneman and Cu,,~.{ssioner Stewart to pass Ordinance No. 3120, carmied as olds: Mayor Jarstad, yes; Cu,,,~ssioner Stewart, yes; Commissioner Schoneman, yes. ORDINANCE - CREATING POSITION/PARKS MAINTENANCE DEPT. Clerk read an O~dinance creating a position of Park Maintenance Man II in the Parks and Recreation Department, and declaring an emergency. Commissioner Schoueman stated he understood that no new positions, re-classifications, or wage increases were going to he implemented prior to the Wage and Reclassification Study; also, asked when this study was going to begin. Mayor Jarstad explained that this employee has been working in the Parks and Recreation Depaz~ti,~nt full time; however, does not have the proper permanent status and is not getting benefits such as sick leave, vacation. Commissioner Stewar~ stated he didn't feel an eme~rgency o~dinance is a necessity. ~4avor Jarstad a~reed to make the o~dinance a two-reading ordinance, and make the following motion. I~otion by ~vor Jarstad and Co~missioner Schoneman to approve the ordinance on first reading, carried as follows: Mayor Jarstad, yes; Commissioner Schoneman, yes; Ccmmkissioner Stewart, yes. ORDINANCE - CRFATING POSITION/MUNICIPAL COURT 0FilCE Mayor Jarstad stated that this ordinance should be set aside until it is determined exactly what funds are to be. used. Mayor Jamstad directed the City Clerk to contact Mm. Jandzlnski and advise him to talk to the rest of the Council members concerning this new position. ORDINANCE - WATER ACCObYrrf~rrS/F~TABLIS}[ING POSITIONS Clerk read An Or~linance creating two temporary positions as Accountants in the Water Office Depsx'.h'~nt of the Water/Sewer Fund, and declaring an emergency. Commissioner Stewart questioned the necessity of the Ordinance. City Clerk read RCW law requiring such an ordinance. Asst. City Attorney Jackson stated he believed the ordinance is required according to RCM. Commissioner Stew~_~t also read the RCM law and stated he could not see anythinK in the law requiring such an ordinance. l~tion by ~3vor Jarstad and Commissioner Schoneman to pass the ordinance on first reading~. City 7keasurer Gallagher was present at the meeting and questioned why he and Frank She~amd Were both paid for working the same day if this is not allowed presently in the Water Department. Mayor Jarstad stated that if this question was brought out at the time, it may not have been allowed in the Treasurer's Office if in violation of RCM. Mr. C~llagher also commented that classifications and titles in the Water and Treastu~er Office need to be revised to reflect the jobs performed. Mayor Jarstad stated this will be part of the considerations in the wage and classification study. COUNCIL MINUTES, CONTINUED, April 3, 197~ Motion carried as follow~: Mayor Jarstad, yes% Con~issioner Stewart, NO; ~ssioneP School, ~s. (N~E: ~ O~IN~ DID N~ P~S--~ O~I~ ~UI~ UN~IMOUS ~PROV~ 0F ~ C~ ~UNCI L ) O~--~NS~R D~SITS OD~ssioner ~ho~ s?a~d ~ ~d l~e to s~ed~e a meeti~ to discuss this p~sed o~in- ~ce. ~ssio~r Ste~ a~ed to ~is meeti~ ~i~ ~ld. PAY BI~S ~ ~ssioneP Stew~ ~d ~m J~ad to give a bluet app~val of Vouches ~. 1325 ~h 1~01, in ~e ~t of $49,~35.34, ~ied ~usly. ~S - ~ISSI0~R ~ 1. ~. ~ew~ stated ~ is ve~ disap~ted ~ t~ City A~o~y's Offi~ for ~t p~p~ing t~ o~ ~lat~g to duties of Auditor ~d ~ef ~t~t; t~t tSey ~id t~s o~i~ ~d ~ ~adv for the meeti~. ~ated ~ ~t ~de~t~d t~ o~i~s ~ ~ p~p~d; t~t ~ ~ew the ~n~ on Auditor's duties was p~p~d ~ca~e ~ obt~d a ~py. ~r J~ad stated it ~d ~ p~r to hold a ~eti~ ~th all st~f ~d ~o~ invol~d to discuss the p~posed o~ces. City Clemk ~ated that he ~s ~s rights ~g~ this ~tter, ~d his leE~ ~s~nsibilities ~d ~ to ~ e~ified. ~m~ssio~r Schon~ su~ested a ~eting ~ sched~ed at 3:00 p.m. to ~scuss the p~sed o~in~s, ~d the other ~ssio~ ~nc~d. ~S - C~ C~ ~itv Cle~ ~ated that ~erly ~et ~vi~ MeetinKs will ~ sched~ed after April 15, 1974, ~en ~s ~ av~lable. ~ssioner ~e~ stated t~s s~d ~ ~ed on the ~p~- ~nt~ leal ~fo~ it is discussed on ~e C~ssio~rs' leal. ~p stated this ~d ~ ~scussed. r~:rl'IN~ ~0~ 1:40 P.M. ~. C. ~N, SR., City Clerk APPROVED: