HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/27/75 MINUTES OF SPECIAL COUNCIL M~'i'fNG
JANUARY 27 ~ 1975
Special MeetJ~ of the City Council of the City of B~me~ton, Washington, was held in the Council
Chambers of City Hall on January 27, 1975, at 9:08 a.m., with the following persons present:
Mayor Jamstad, presiding; Com~issione~ Stewart, Cul,nis~;~one~ Sehoneman, City Clerk Yeadon, Asst.
City Attorney Sexton~ and representatives of the press and radio.
Meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation by G.C. Yeadon, Sr., City Clerk.
GAMBLING TAX ON BINGO
Mayor stated that in talking to tkose people oonee~-ned with Bingo Tax it seens to be felt
that a lowe~ percent figure up to 810,000 in g~oss receipts is desirable.
Motion by Mayor Jar~tad and Con~ission~ ~ehoneman that the figure in the p~esent o~dinance
~----~ng for 10 percent tax on all PepoI~ted income be d~opped to a five percent figure up to
$10,000 of all ~ecorded receipts and 10 per~e~t from that point on.
Cc~nissloneP Stewart stated he would favor an elimination of tax on games less than $3,000
and a tax of ten pepeent for all g~nes ovep 82,000.
Motion b~ Co~missioner StewazWc to amend the o~dinanee to eliminate tax on games of 83,000 or less
o~ gr~ss revenue after prizes, and leave it at 10 pe~ce~ afte~ that. Motion died fop lack of
second.
Mayor Ja~stad ct~ented that the 1975 budget has lost approximately 87~000 due to the fact that
C~,,,issioner Stewart ~efused to vote for an emergency o~dinance implementing gambling taxes; that
such an ordinance would ~equtpe an unanJ~ous~vote.
Question on original motion made by Mayor JaPstad and C~,,,,issloneP Schoneman caz~ied as follows:
Maser Ja~stad, yes; Commissione~ Stewart, yes; C~,~issioner Schoneman, yes.
CETA OONTRACT
Mayor Ja~stad ~epo~ted on success of former gove~.~,[tent funded e~ployee prognm~s. Chief Schlie of
the Police Department stated use of CETA employees would help maintain present strength of the
Police Dep~.b~,ent; also, noted that EEA pm3gmam was ver~ successful and all EEA office~s were
eventually placed in a permanent position when othe~ office~s retired om ~esigned. Asst. Chief
MeiKs of the Fi~e Del~-b,ent spoke on success of EFA P~ognam and noted that all four EEA men
w~r~ placed in permanent positions; also, stated that two men would be allocated to the Fime
Dep~x-b.ent and in March would like to apply for one mo~e m~m_~in order to balance the shifts.
.Mayor Ja~stad cc~mented that the Pa~ks Dep~.b.ent is also very hopeful of usin~ CETA employees.
Cu~,,~issioner Schoneman noted that no CETA ~mployees would be designated to the Police Department.
Chief Schlie stated they a~e hoping to obtain some u~fA employees during Ma~ch allocation.
Cu~,,~issioner Stewart stated he is opposed to the CETA Pr~gnmm when the~e is no outlined plan of
work for the employees to do; that he is opposed to spending money from any source unless
scmethin~ is acc~nplished. Stated the Federal Cov~'.~,.ent cannot afford this plan and would be
operating out of deficit budget; also, commented that he is coneel~ned that the City will use
mo~e and mo~e of this type of funding, and then when the funding runs out, will not be able to
keep the employees.
C~¥.h~ssioner Schoneman cu,,,ented that this p~ogr~m will %-~ain employees so they will have the
skills to work elsewhere at a futur~ date; also, noted that these people would be receiving
unemployment or w~lfa~e benefits if not given an opportunity to work fo~ a salary.
Mayor Jar~tad also cu,,.ented on the unemployment factom and gave examples of the successful EEA
Pr~r~n. Mayor stated it is the Council's ~esponsibility to utilize these federal funds in orde~
to provide the pr~pe~ gove~,,ental semvices to the c~,,unity.
Motion by Mayo~ Jar~tad and Cc~missioner Schon~nan to authorize signing of the CETA Contract
6-008 for new positions, caz~ied as follows: MaYOm Ja~stad, yes; Cu~,~,issioner Stewart, no;
C~,,,issionem Schone~an, yes.
Motion by Mayor Ja~stad and Cc~missione~ Schoneman to approve the Contmact Addendum for positions
~---transfer~ f~u~ EEA to CETA, eaz~ied unanimously.
ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATIONS- 1975 BUDGET
Hayor Ja~stad explained that City Council January 9th authoPized a 12 percent wage increase to
management and supervisor~ personnel (employees not negotiable by Union Contract--non-uniformed)
and the City Attorney's Office was included on the r~cap of the positions to be covered by this
increase. Fu~the~ stated he personally delivered tBis ~ecap to the Chief Accountant and
authorized him to proceed with ~e Council dlr~ction to gr~nt this increase. Stated that he
would like to know who is responsible for the Attorney's Office being excluded from this pay
increase. Maycz~ showed ~{~u~es indicating that the City Attorney's Office did not ~eceive
this pay adjustment and were not even budgeted fop the adjus~nent, although they should have been.
Stated the City Attorney's Office is a legal det~.bnent of the City of ~eme~ton according to
the Citw Charte~ and ther~ is no ~eason they should be excluded from this p~evious Council Action.
Mayor ~ead opinion from City Attor~ev's Office signed by Ga~y Sexton stating that the Attorney's
Office is a legal depa~-b,mrfc of the ~ity; the City Attorney may hir~ assistants at his pleasure,
and in accordance, his staff heecmes City of Bmeme~ton amployees.
CITY COUNCIL h~rING - JANUARY 27; 1975 (Cont.)
M~otion by MayoP Ja~stad and C~,,i~{ssione~ Schoneman to Pead the Ordinance dPawn up to allocate
additional funds to gPant a 12 percent pay Paise to the City Attorney's Office as approved fop
all employees.
Co~ssioneP Sehoneman stated he undePstood thiswould confirm an action p~eviously approved by
City Council~ that this wa~e ad~us~ent was given to all depa~.hL,ents except the City Attorney's
Office, and it was approved fo~ all depa~b,~ents. MayoP Jar~tad stated this is correct.
Cu~,.issione~ Stewart stated be did not undePstand the ~eason fop City Attorney's Office
employees w~Pkir~ diffe/~_nt h3u~s, and didn't feel it was proper to have "Stand-in" PepPesentatior
(b~mented he felt the City Attorney's budget is high on a pe~ capita basis and should not be
incr~ased~ also, stated be felt payment should be made to the City Attorney on a consultant
basis through genial claim and he should then pay his own employees.
Cu,,~,issione~ Schon~nan stated he did not a~ree with this statement~ that Consultants a~e hi~ed
fop a par~iculal~ job and upon completion of that job they a~e no lor~eP used until needed
a~ain; that the City Attorney is used on a day-to-day basis and works fop the City on a ~ent
status.
Question called on motion as follows: Ma~p JaPstad~ yes~ Co~isslonem Stewar~, yes~
co~missfone~ Schon~man, yes. (NOTE: T~is motion was to ~ead the ordinance.)
ORDINANCE NO. 3193
Clemk ~ead An Ordinance amendin~ Ordinance No. ~185 r~_latin~ to the Final Budget fop fiscal yea~
1975, app~opPiatin~ dlffe~ent amounts in the Theatre construction and 1971 Wate~/Sewep
Revenue Bond Reserve Funds, and approp~iatin~ funds in the GenePal Fund.
Motion by C~,,,Lissione~ Stewar~c to strike from the ordinance the ~ount given to the City
Attorney's Office, and to Pest~iet them to the amount in the 1975 ~udKet. Motion died fo~ lack
of second.
Motion by MayoP Ja~stad and Os~mlssionem Schoneman to pass Ordinance NO. $19~, ca~Pied as
o1~: Mayor Ja~stad, yes; Oo~missione~ Stewa_~t, no; C~,~ssione~ Sehoneman, yes.
Motion by Mayor Jar~tad and C~,~kissioner Sehoneman to dtPeet City Clerk to question Chief
Accountant, undeP oath, as to why the 10% fi~ was not added into the City AttoPney's budget
as it was added into all budgets of the City Departments when he was diPeeted to do so by the
Mayor; why ~e did not pay the 12 percent figure which was unanimously passed by the City council
on January 9th fop all management employees and depax.b,~_nt beads, copy of which the Mayor
personally handed to Chief Accountant; and ask whethe~ all otbeP employees' pay cheeks now
meflect the 12 percent ink,ease ~r~nted by union contract. City Clerk stated he would follow
throuKh with t~is direction. Motion ca/zeied unanimously.
Motion by C~,,issione~ Stewart and (b~misisone~ Schoneman that all pay chanKes be ~eviewed by
t-~ef Accountant p~ioP to bein~ bPou~ht up at City Council Meeting, carried unan~ously.
Motion by Cc,missionem Stewar~ and Cu~,,~[ssione~ Schon~man to ~e~ad the ordinance r~latin~ to
payment of accumulative sick leave upon death of any City employee, car%~ied unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 3194
Clerk ~ead An 0~dinanee Pelatin~ to Sick Leave ~endin~ O~dinance No. 1813 as amended by
Ordinance No. 2297, 2335, 2385, 2588~ 2~50~ 259g- 281~, 29~5, 2990, and 3025~ and de~laPir~
an ~er~ency.
Morion by Mayop Jar~tad and Cc~m~isisone~ Sehon~uan to pass O~dinanee nO. 319g.
Cu,,~,issione~ Stewart stated he did not feel this ordinance should be passed on an amer~enoy
basis; that the ordinance should have been passed at an eaPlie~ date to avoid an amer~ency
passage which should be kept strictly fop emergency situations.
MayoP JaPstad explained that this ordinance is bein~ passed in accordance with the Non-Uniformed
Employees' Union contPact ~ that this is oneof the provisions aK~eed to in the contract, and the
ordinance must be passed to allow the City to comply with this contract if needed. Explained
the Council is already obliKated to this action by Union Contract, and this is not a debatable
issue.
City ClePk noted that the urgency of the ordinance is stated the~eln, and that if not passed, the
City may be foPced into a union eorT suit ~ ~eeo~mended passage of the ordinance.
Cu,,~isslone~ Stewart stated he did not like to be in this situation~' but he w~uld be for~ed to
honoP the ondinanee to p~event the City f~u,, Eettin~ involved in a possible eou~t suit.
Motion carried as follows: Mayop Jar~tad, yes~ Cu~m~issione~ Stewar~, yes~ Co~ssionem
Schoneman, yes.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING - JANUARY 27, 1975 (Cont.)
PRE-COUNCIL MEETINGS
Cc~nissione~ Scbon~nan stated he felt it would be a good idea for the Council to resume having
"Pre-Council Meetings" in order to go over the Agenda and study scme of the items, having
a better knowledge of what is coming up and having a better understanding of these items.
City Clerk stated that an ~nending ordinance may have to be prepared t~ change the Council
Meetln~ time or to allow for such a "Pr~-Council Meeting". May~r Ja~stad stated they would be
open meeting, s with the Press invited.
Mmtion by Commissione~ Schoneman and Mayor Jarstad to have "P~e-councll Meetings" ever~
~-e~day at 8: 30 a.m., and to direct the City Attormey to prepare any necessary doctments to
~mplement this procedume; carried unanimously.
LONGEVITY PAY - DEPT. HEADS/SUPEVISORS, ETC.
~btion by Mayor Jarstad and C~,~[ssioner Schonenan that the s~ne longevity ~ay increase allocated
to the non-uniformed enployees negotiated by Union Contract be allocated to management personnel,
thus adopting this longevity p~y schedule to all non-uniformed City ~ployees, carried
unanimously.
ADJOURNtD
APPROVED: ~iC. CITY CLERK
GLENN K. JARSTAD, MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL Mr~I'/NG MINUTES
JAN];ARY 29, 1975
The re~uler meeting of the Citv Council of the City of BremerTon, Washington, w~s held in the
CouncLl Chambers of City Hall at 9:00 a.m., PST, Wednesday, January 29, 1975. Attending
were: C~,,,t[ssioner Stewart, Mayor P~otemDore; Co~nissionem Sch~neman, City Clerk Yeadon,
Asst. City_ Attorney McCluskev, and representatives of the press and r~dio. Mayor on USS
CON;~I'~-:~ J ATION.
Meeting opened with the Pledge of AlleAiance and Invocation by G.C. Yeadon, Sr., City Clerk.
~-~ of January 2~, 1975, and Janua/~y 27, 1975 were read and apiA-oved as amended.
SEPARATION
Elizabeth Campbell, Admin. Asst. Bkkpr., KCCS, Resigned, January; 17, 1975.
Motion by C~,,,issioner Schoneman and Cum,,issioner Stewar~c to approve the separation, cax-'~ied
unanimously.
~PLDYMENTS
Yun Sun Hon~,, PT Playleader, Pa~ks DeDar~ment, $3.30 h~., Januar~ ~9, 1975.
Linda Lee Biltoft, Asst. Admin. Bkkpm., KCCS, $3.058 h~., Januar~ 22, 1975.
Timothv Bellville, }~drr~ Help, Planning Dept., $2.50 hr., Januar~ 27, 1975.
Ann Finnegan, Office Asst. I, T~easurer's Office, $3.07 hr., Jan. 27, 1975.
Motion by Co~0nissionem Stewart ar~ Cc~missloner Schoneman to approve the emplovments, carTied
unanimously.
CHAN~ES IN PAY STATUS
Venessa Datus, Clerk-Dispatcher, PPovlsionaLl, Street, Dept., ~ $3.68 h~. to $3.86 hr.,
Effective Dec~mber 29, 1975.
Glenn Shephard, Elect-~onics Teeh. Senior, Communications, From $6.07 hr., to $6.27 h~.,
Effective Janual-y 27, 1975, End of Six Month P~obation.
Marvin Heistand, Electronics Technician Senior, C~m~unications, t'£u,, $6.07 to $6.27 hr.,
Effective Januar~ 27, 1975, End of Six Month Probation.
Motion bv Cu~,~issioner S~honeman and Cc~issioneP Stewsr~ to approve the Changes in Pay Status,
e-~ed unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL M~rrlNG - JANUARY 29, 1975 (Cont.)
LETTER - UNION - ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT
Clerk mead m~mo dated 23 January7 1975 from AFSCME Imeal 2052 Pmesident Ge~nie Saunde~s to City
Council advising that union me~be~s voted to accept the City's pz-oposal with the exception
of paragraph #4 inammuch as this paragraph dealt with possible subjects for the yea~ 1976; also~
outlined the items accepted as follows: (1) Pay ~se of 12 percent of that ~ate of pay
in effect on 31 Decembe~ 1974, (2) Longevity at the ~ate of one percent of pay for each five
5~al~s of City employment, (3) Payment of any unused sick leave to an employee's estate upon
the death of such employee. Clerk ~ead lei~ce~ dated 21 Janual~ 1975 ft~m Lilly Piva~
Repmesentative AFL-CIO, confi~min~ this info.ma/ion.
MESSEUSE LICENSE APPLICATIONS
City Clerk p~esented the following Masseuse License Applications ~ecuia,~nded for denim1 by the
Police Depa~-h,'Lent: Jeanne Ann Wy~ick, Carol Ann Powers, Teanie Elizabeth Ca~te~, Alma
louise Christ ~ Lynn Ellen Fahel. Clerk r~ad r~asons fop Pec~%endation attached to each
application.
Motion by Oo~mlssione~ Stewart and C~,~issione~ Schoneman to accept the r~oo~mendations of the
~ Depa~.b.ent, and deny the applications; carried unanimously. Clerk noted that he would
officially notify the applicants and advise them of their right to ~equest a hea~ing.
APPLICATION FOR TAXI CAB DRIVER LICENSE
Clerk p~esented Application fora Tax'icab D~ive~s License from Eugene Fl~aneis Goodenough,
approved by Captain Johnson for the CHief of Police.
Motion by Cu,,,~issione~ Stewar~ and Cc~missioneP Sehoneman to approve the application, carried
unanimously.
REJECT BIDS - CEMETERY
Clerk stated that he and fb~nissionep St~ reoo~mend City Council reject the bids and
authorize a new call for bids when the plans and specifications a~e ~mended to bring the
bids closer to the ~ount presently authorized to be spent.
Motion by Cu,,.issioner Stewart and C~,m~issione~ Sehoneman to ~e~ect the bids and authomize new
~-~ call as ~eco~mended, carried unanimously.
CALL FOR BIDS - PAINTING/ECKLUND & #6 RESERVOIRS
Clerk read memo dated 28 Januar~ 1975 from E.R. Wellem to C~,¥,~issione~ Schoneman requestinf
authorization to call for bids for the ~epainting of the intemio~ and exterio~ of #5 and Ecklund
Reservoirs as provided in 1975 kudget.
Motion by Cu,~issioner Stewar~ and Cu,,,,issioner Sehoneman to authol~ize the bid call, carTied
unanimously.
BID CALL - W~l'~ Mb','k~S
~lerk read memo dated 28 January 1975 frcm E.R. Weller to C~,,~,issioner Schon~m~un requesting
authorization to call for bids for the purchase of water meter sizes 5/8" x 3/4" through 2"
to he used for new service connections and to replace obsolete meters in our continuing meter
replacement program. Included in 1975 budget.
Motion by Co~mlssioner Schon~nan and C~,,,~ssioner Stewart to authorize the bid call, carried
unanimously.
BID CALL - POLICE VEHICLE
Clerk read letter dated January 24, 1975, from Chief of Police and Sg~c. of Traffic Division to
City Council requestin~ authorization to call for bids for one Cushman police vehicle or its
equal; included in 1975 budget.
Motion by Cu,,,,iss~oner Stew~L~t and Cum~issioner Schon~n to authorize the bid call, carried
unanimouslv.
Clerk read memo dated 23 Januarv 1975 frcm Building Inspector to City Council requesting budget
adjustment for extra help and increases in repairs and maintenance to cover increase in gas
prices.
Motion by C~,,,,issioner Schoneman and Co~issioner Stewart to authorize the ad~us~ent subject
to review bV the Chief A~countent, carried unanimously.
~_~.~EST FOR HEARIN~ - KUM SOON HDBBS MASS~JSE APPLICATION
Clerk r~ad letter dated 21 January 1975 f~cm Kuru ~ Hobbs requesting hearing with City
Council reagardi~ previous denial of her application for Masseuse License.
Motion by Co~misisoner Schon~man and C~,,~issioner Stewar~ to set hearing dated February 5, 1975,
at 11: 00 a.m., carried unanimously.
Clerk read letter dated 27 January frc~ Conifer Developments, Inc., to City Clerk requesting
hearinK continuation scheduled the second meeting in February be postponed unt~ a March Council
date.
Motion by Cc~ssioner Stewa~c and Cu,,,~ssioner Schoneman to schedule the Hearing oontinuation
March 19, 1975, at 10:~0 a.m., carried unanimously.
(Coontz F~ Central School sites) zone classification; Bo~ess Richardson application for rezone
at 4020 Bledsoe; and Administrative Variance Pmo~edu~e amendment.
Motion by Conmissioner Stewart and Commissioner Sehoneman to set hearin~ dates 26 February 1975
- 10:30 a.m., carried unanimously.
CORPS OF ENGINES PERMIT APPLICATIONS
Clerk r~ad mem~ dated 22 Januar,y 1975 frc~ City Engineer to City Council recommending that a
letter be sent to the Corps of Engineers indleatln~ that the City of B~emerton does not object
to the issuance of permits to Cascade Natural Gas Company to install cathodic urotection for
the nas system at Lebo Boulevard (coal dock), Thompson D~ive, Forest D~ive, P~°vided that they
follow the City's specifications for crossing existin~ asbestos cement lines in melation to
Permit Applications 92417 and 2418 and that the City w~ll notify the CorDs of Engineers of the
results of public hearings for Shomeline Management Substantial Development Permits.
~otlon by Co~issioner Schoneman and C~,,~,issioner Stewart to follow reeu~,,~endations of City
E--/~-~er by sendin~ such a letter, car~ied unanimously.
LL'rrEK - WAGE 8 PRICE CONTROLS
Clerk read letter dated 17 January 1975 from U.S. Senator MaKnuson to City Clepk ~ega~ding City
of Bremerton wage and price control resolution, and statir~ that he has not ruled out advocating
a wag~e-price control program if it become, s obvious that inflation can be controlled through no
other apu~oaeh.
~JBLIC M~rINGS -SEPA
Clerk presented Notice of Public Meetings to be held concerning SEPA guide-lines for Environmental
Impact Statements; also, presented schedule of these meetings. Referped to City Planner.
SEWER SERVICE - MITEH~.L PROPERTY
Clerk read letter dated 2~ Januars; 1975, from Subdivision Management Company P~esident to City
O~uncil explaining~ that Wick Homes, Inc., wish to develop the 37-ac~e site owned bv Mrs. Mitchell
(Northwest ODr~er Pine Rd. S Riddell); that this proper~ty is in the County and will ecme before
the Kitsap County Plannin~ Commission on February 24th, and they need the following policy
statement frcm the City of B~emerton to Kitsap County: (1) That all outside eonnectlons to
the City of Brekmemton sewer system must be acccmDanled by an outside sewer a~reement, (2) That
the City has no current plans to annex the area in question into the City, (~) That if, in the
future, the County!-.p~uvides sewer service to the propez.ty~ the project, if still in the County,
could disconnect fr~ the City sewers and connect tb the CountV §ewers, (g) At the time said
disconnection did occum, the outside utility agreement ~uld become null and void. Co~mlssioner
Schon~nan explained that the cost of connection ~uld be paid by the developers, and that this
~uld actually help the Kravitv flow system.
Motion bV Cu,,~issioner Schone~ln and Oommiss[oner Stewart to approve these conditions and allow
the connection throuKh Outside Utility AKPeement~ cs/-Pied unanimously.
REPORTS - CO~ISSIONER SCHONEMAN:
1. Held meeting yesterday with L~ Martin representing C.H.2.M. Hill Ccmpany to cheek on
information that B~eme~ton has with respect to the Ci%7 sewer proKram in the past. P~evious City
studies will be incorporated into anv proposals b£uught to the County and City C~N~issloners
upon ccmpletion of thei~ projects, and meimkursed for cc~pleted sewer plans bv the City.
2. Met with Bill Korf, District H~h%~y F~n~ineer, and discussed program of substitutinK Burwell
for Sixth Street as a State Highway. Discussed ~mount of work city would expect State to pay
for in up-Kraaling Sixth Street prior to turning over to the City.
~. Will be welu~ming USS CONSTELLATION representing the City at 10:00 a.m. in the Shipyard on
Saturday.
4. Having reception in Mayor's Office at 3:00 p.m. today in honor of John Balbo, Lions
International P~esident and that he is in Br~mer~on for 50th anniversary eelebratlon of Central
Lions Club and will tour the City to review acoomplis~ments of the Lions Club.
5. Iry Moritz has been working on cleaninK and repairing a well that has been used for 30 years
and water production has come back to the amount it was 30 years ago which is 1 1/2 million
Kallons p~ day. He will continue on cleaning proKrams with three other wells.
6. Februar~ 1, 1960, took office as Public Works OD~issioner; 15 years ago.
COMMISSIONER STEWART:
1. Sick Leave and Annual Leave will be meeorded on pay checks this payday.
2. Gave an~ual bus report for the year 1974; income has improved and have reduced cost of
operation. On file in Co~missloner Stewart's Office.
HFY~RING - BRIDGEVI~W, INC. (CHERRY/G~ERRY PLACE)
Motion by Commissioner Stewart and Cu,,~ssioner Sehon~man to open hearing at this time, carried
unanimously.
CITY COUNCIL M~L'I'ING - JANUARY 29~ 1975 (Cont.)
C~,,,,iss~oner Stewart e~plalned that he should not pa~tleipate in t~is hea~in~ because he owns
property adjacent to the site proposed fop Pezoning.
Clerk ~ead memo dated 28 Janua_~y 1975 fr~n Asst. City Attorney Pinckney to City Clemk and
Cu,,,issioner Stewart advising that P~,~,,issioner Stewsr~c should not participate in the hea~ing
due to the fact he has adjacent p~oDe~.ty~ that since the Mayor is not l~esent, the heaping
should be continued to anothe~ date.
Motion by Cu,¥~issione~ Stewar~ and Cu~,,~issione~ Schoneaan to r~cess the heapinK until Feb~uar!; 5,
19--~-, at 10:00 a.m., car~eied unanimously.
HEARING~ - PROPERTY HOLDING g DEVELOPMENT (PINE ROAD) CHANGE OF SI'IE PLAN
Motion by Co~nissioner Sehoneman and Co~*nissioner Ste~k~t to open hea~ing, carried unanimousl¥~
Clerk stated that notice of heaping was adver~cised in official newspaper, letters were sent
to property owners within 250 feet, and prop~-ty ~s .posted; all at the prope/, time as
~equimed by law.
Clerk read Planning Cu,,,~ission Resolution No. 280 stating the ~nain diffepenee between the new
proposed site plan and the si~e plan originally approved and incoz.porated with O~dinance 92958
a~e as follows:
1. The new site contains 3.76 aca-es, which excludes the approximately 1 acre site of the
Ch~istensen residence, whereas the forme~ site contained 4177 acres.
2. The new plan contains 63 units (1 and 2 bedrock); former plan contains 68 units (1, 2, and
3 bedroom).
3. The fomer site plan indicated a concentration of units at the eastern and western ends of
the site, whereas the current plan distributes the units uniformly over the site.
4. The former site indicated, in the eente~ of the site, a l~c"f~ation building, pool, putting
~reen and children's play al-ea. The p~oposed plan shows a pond in the center of the site and
a pool in the easter~ pol~tion of the site.
5. Access to Pine Road in the ~evised site plan is only at the southwestern corne~ of Tract 15.
The for~er plan indicated access both at the southwestern and nol~thweste~n cor~em of the Teact.
6. The eaplieP plan showed 2 pa~king stalls pe~ dwelling unit. The ~nt plan shows
ap[,£oxlmatelv 1.5 stalls De/- unit.
7. The proposed plan indicated parking or driveways around the enti~e periphery of the site,
whereas the forme~ plan had pal-king concentrated along the length of the no~th and south
property lines.
8. Sewers to aecomodate sanitar~ and store effluent a~e available adjacent to the ~ite.
}~x~ever, the location and depth of these facilities in ~elation to the site topography may
cause scme difficulty in connection to the lines.
Resolution 280 Pec~,,,ended approval of the change with the following conditions:
1. Existing vegetation shall be incorporated into the final site develo~aent plans wher~
feasible.
2. No store drainage shall be allowed to drain into the natural d~ainage way which abuts the
eastern p~ope~ty line.
Clerk r~ad Planning C~,,ission Minutes dated December 18, 1975, confirming this resolution.
Clerk r~.ad Envirormental Asses~nent and Staff Review stating the site plan complies with all
the requir~nent of the zofiing o~dinanee; that it is determined that the action of changing the
rez~Dne site plan is not a major action and will not r~sult in significant effects to the
envir~rments and a detailed Envirormental Impact Statement will not be p~epar~d.
Motion bv Co~mlssioner Sehoneman and Co~mlssioner Stewar~t to accept the Envirormental
ss~ent as ccmplete, carried unanimously.
Clerk presented Depaz.b~,ental Responses as follows: Engineering Dept: Storm and sanitary;
sewer~ available; curb gutters and sidewalk must be provided on Pine Road. Fir~ Depa~,b,ent:
Additional Fi~e ~t p~oteetion should be p£ovided. ~ter Department: Water main is
available on Pine Road. Police Traffic: No objection on approval of prope~ dmlveway.
Clerk read note from M~. and M~s. Ch~istensen advising they have no objections as per the sketch
pr~vioed thei~ propez~ty is included in any zone change, and bi~. Plescher assured the~ that they
a~e still in the zone.
GeorKe Plescher, City Planner, gave p~esentation to Council and showed the site on an a~ea map.
CITY COUNCIL M~L']'IN~ - JA~JARY 29, 1975 (Cont.)
PROPONENTS
Steve Anderson, ProDe~ty Holding ~ Development, advised they have solved all physical p~oblems
and a~e p~epaPed for construction upon approval of the Council.
Cu~¥,issioner $chon~nan questioned whether they have a plan for sewe~ eonnectlons and hydrant
pr~tectlon.
Mr. Anderson stated that Mike Williams of the Company is womking out a plan and it will be
p~esented prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
Nina Ch~istensen stated she had no objection sJ~ce the zoning is not to be chanM~ed and this is
merely dealing with a change in site plan.
Motion by Cu~,issioner Stewart and Cu~,~,issione~ Schon~nan to approve the request based on the
P-~lnK Cum~ission ~eeon~nenda~ion, carried unanimously.
~JRPLUS PORTION OF SR 3
Clerk ~ead lette~ dated 27 January 1975 fEwn General Services Adminlst~ation to Mayor Ja~stad
advising that a por~on of SR 3, A~senal Way to Chico, has been determined sumplus'Gover-~ment
property and available for disposal, and giving instructions to any a~ency interested in
purchase of this ~£upePtw.
Motion bM C~,,,issioner Schonenan and Co~missione~ StewaI~ to ~efel- this information to the
E--/~-~eI~in~ Depa~,b,ent for map to be p~epa~ed and b~ing the matte~ up a~ain next Council MeetinK,
carTied unanimously.
ACTURIAL STUDY - FIRENEN'S PENSION FUND
Clerk read lei-tap dated 21 January 1975 f~c~ Milllman g Rober~son, Inc., ~eDo~tin~ that amount
of money in Fimemen's Pension Fund as of January 1, 1975, togethe~ with est~nated income from
sources other than ~ proper~y tax will be sufficient to meet the estimated disbul~sements
frDm said Fund during 1975.
HIGHWAY COMMISSION - UTILITY SEMINAR
Clerk presented lette~ dated 27 January; 1975 from State Highway Cu~,,ission to City of Br~mer~on
advisin~ that District No. S of the State High, ay Depa~.~u,,ent is planning to conduct a Utility
Seminar Mar~h 11 in Shelton, Ma~ch 12 in BPeme~ton and MaI~h 1S, 1975 in Tacoma. Refer~ed
to Co~nissione~ Sehon~nan. Copy Pefer~ed to Chief Ancountant.
PORT ORCHA~RD WAT~
Clerk ~ead Agreement for Supplying Wate~ to the City of Port Or~har~.
Motion bM Cu,,~issioner Schonenan and CG,~aissione~ Stewart to approve the Agr~enent, carried
unanimously.
Meeting Recessed 10:55. Called to O~der 11:05 a.m.
BID OPENING - THEATRE CONSTRUCTION
Motion bM C~m~nissione~~ Schoneman and Cu~,~issioner Stewart to open bids as scheduled, carTied
unanimously. Clerk opened the following bids:
Solie Construction, BP~nerd3on, 5% Bid Bond Enclosed ................ $295,500
Co~e~cial Builders, Bl~emer~con, Bid Bond 5% Enclosed ................ 279~987
Noted: This ~ount does include alteNnate bid amounts.
Motion bM Cc~missioner Schon~man and Cu,,,~ssioner Stewart to Pefe~ bids to cu,,,~ittee for
z~co~nendation of awal-d including City Clerk, City Coun~l, Cu~,,~Gnity Theatre menbers~
Bob Thelx~ux, and Govex'.~,,,ent Funding A~ency; caI~ied unanimously.
ORDINANCE - SHORT PLATS/~3BDIVISIONS
Clerk read An Ordinance governing sho~t plats and sho~t subdivisions within the City of Br~mer~con;
ssttinK, forth: the ~egulations, pr~)eedupes, filing requirements, fees and aDpointing an
Administrator for the su~uar~ approval thereof.
Discussion was held, and C~,~issione~ Stewart commented the ordinance seemed to be quite
restrictive and he would like more information before voting on this matter.
Schoneman suKgested distribution of ordinance copies and meeting with the Planner.
Motion by CoHmissloner Stewart and C~,,issioner Schoneman to postpone action on the proposed
o~nce until the Planne~ meets with City Council, carried unanimously.
ORDINANCE - CIDSE 0UT SAL~S
Clerk presented An Ordinance PelatinK to and providing fop the licensin~ and regulation of certain
kinds of sales of merchandise, includin~ bankl-upt and insolvent sales, and definin~ offenses
and prDvidinK penalties for the violation thel~eof.
Motion bM C~,,,,issloner Stewal~t and Cc~missioneP Schoneman to postpone action on this matter,
~R~ve the Police Depa~.b.ent meet with the City Council, carried unanimously.
ORDINANCE -FIRST READING - SC~l'l'r REZONE (OLYMPIC AVENUE)
Clerk read, First reading, An O~dinance amending the use and a~ea maps of O~dinance No. 1792.
Motion by Cu,,,,issloner Schon~nan and Cu,,,~issionap Stewal~t to approve ordinance on fk~st reading
ear, led as follows: Commissioner Stewart, yes; Co~missioner Schoneman, yes.
CITY COUNCIL MEL'I'Iklq - JANURAY 29, 1975 ((]ont.)
ORDINANCE - FIRST READIN~ - SMITH CHANGE OF SITE PLAN '(WHEAION WAY)
Clerk read, First Readir~, An Ondinanee 8mending Section 1 Of Ordinance No. 3036 and adding
sub-sections 8 and 7 thereto.
~otlon by C~,,,~[ssione~ Schoneman and C~m,lssionep Stewal~t to approve ordinance on first
~, carried as follows: Cu,,,~ssioner Ste~, yes; C~,,,isstoner Sehone~%n, yes.
ORDINANCE - AUTO CENr~ WAY
Clerk read, first reading, An Ordinance rer~nlng ~%rsenal Way with the City of B~emerton to Auto
Center Way.
Motion by Cc~nissioner Stewart and Cum,~issioner Schonaman to approve ordinance on first reading,
carried as follows: Cu,,,issioner Stewart, yes; Co~mlisstoner Sehone~an, yes.
ORDINANCE - BINGO TAX
~l'e~k read, first reading, An Ordinance amending Sub-section (a) of Section 2 of Ordinance
No. 3187, providing for rate of tax to be levied on Bingo receipts.
Motion by C~,~,~issioner Schoneman and C~,nlssioner Stewsrt to approve ordinance on first
r~--~zng, carried as follows: Cu,,~issioner Stewart, yes; Commissioner Schoneman, yes.
RESOLUTION - BASIS FOR C0MM3/~ OVERTIME/POLICE DEPT.
C~erk presented A Resolution declaring ~rk period ~o be used as basis of comDuting over~ime
for Police Depa~b,,ent employees. City Clerk stated this is requested by Police Depaz.[,,mnt in
order to c~aply with Fair Labor Standards ~t which is presently involved with court suit.
Discussion held, and this matter referred to Chief Accountant to determine financial impact.
STATE LAND FXC~=E NO. 129
Clerk advised he wmote a letter to the State requesting a Warranty Deed in place of a Quit
Claim Deed for the p~oper~y exchange, and he received a letter stating this is not policy of
the State; that the State only accepts Warranty Deeds end only issues Quit Claim Deeds due
to the fact that State lands do not have a lor~ chain of title and have been in State ownership
for many years.
Motion by Cc~missioner Stewart and Co~,,,issioner Scbon~an to direct the City Clerk acquire
a..p~e, liminary.tltle report andto refer this to the City Attorney's Office for determination of
wnerner the C~ty should acquire title insurance; carried unanimously.
M~SSEUSE LICENSES - 0PINION/A~RNEY
Clerk read m~ dated ~9 Janual~y 1975 from Asst. City Attorney Jackson to City Clerk advising
that a masseuse need only to acquire one City license which would r~main in effect in the event
he or she changed place of employment. Ref~ed to City Attorney for checking in the event the
masseuse license ~as paid for by the owner of the massage parlor.
BILLS
~---~n by Cu,,~(issioner Stew~trt and Cu,,,issioner Schoneman to give a blanket approval of
Vou~s ~790 through ~867 fora payment in ~unt of ~8~798.20; car~ied unanJ3nously.
M~L'['IMG ADJOURNED 11:~5 a.m.
G.. YEADO , SR., CITY CLERK
APPROV ED:
· JARSTAD, R