Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/26/85TAPE ~257 UNAPPROVED DRAFT ~;0049 · ~0154 · ~0174 · ~0195 · CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES June 26, 1985 ,~t~O~ The -regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was held in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, June 26, 1985, at 4:30 p.m. with Council President Art Anderson presiding. Present were Councilmen E.L.Sturdivant, Bill Amo, Russ Johnson, Roy Mosely, Clyde Pachek, Spencer Horning and Phil Drouin. Absent was Councilman Jim Adrian. Also present were Mayor Morrie Dawkins, City Attorney Bill Broughton and City Clerk Kathleen McCluskey. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance, led by Council President Art Anderson with Councilman Spencer Horning giving the invocation. CONSENT AGENDA Item #A - Repair of Furukawa Loader, #AB84-279; Item #B - Extension of Great Northwest Federal Saving & Loan Agreement (Participation Agreement - Special Loan Program #2444, #AB85-280. M/S/C/U/(Mosely/Sturdivant) to approve items #A - B, Consent Agenda. Item #C - Change Order #2 - Water Utility Building, #AB85- 281; The items as listed on the attachment, filed in the City Engineer's office, are necessary to complete the subject project. The addition of $4,676.11 for this Change Order will still keep the total amount of construction under the original contract amount of $399,998.00. Mr. Dave Baker, Assistant City Engineer, clarified that this is the lower part of the property on Olympus Drive, location of the new Water Utility Administration Building. M/S/C/U/(Mosely/Pachek) to approve Change Order #2 - Water Utility Building. Item #D - Change Order #16 to Contract C-3, Wastewater Facilities Construction Project, #AB85-282; This change order formalizes fourteen (14) previously approved changes to Contract C-5. These changes were necessary to provide the Wastewater Utility with a high quality efficient station. Mr. Baker, WWF Project Manager, stated this change order will reduce costs approximately $3,500.00 annually. M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Horning) Contract C-3. to approve Change Order ~16 to CLAIMS/WARRANTS REGISTER Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24,080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing which has been made available to the Council. M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Mosely) on June 26, 1985, the Council, by a unanimous vote, does approve for payment vouchers included in the Wastewater Facilities Construction Project listing in the total amount of $834,293.79. M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Amo)) on June 26, 1985, the Council, by a unanimous vote, does approve for payment those vouchers included in the above list and further described as follows: voucher numbers #12594 - #12840, in the total amount of $314,790.50, and voucher number #12599, in the total amount of $684.63. TAPE #257 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes June 26, 1985 Pg. 2 of 10 UNAPPROVED DRAFT #0205 · MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Dawkins noted that his responsibilities include proposing citizens for positions on Boards and Commissions and that Ms. Marion Derrig's term on the Housing Authority, Board of Commissioners, will expire on July 17, 1985. He recommended that she be reappointed' to another five-year term. Attached is her application for appointment along with a letter from the Executive Director of the Bremerton Housing Authority. Mayor Dawkins introduced Ms. Derrig who thanked the City for the opportunity of serving the the challenges facing the Housing Authority at any given time. M/S/C/U/(Pachek/Drouin) to reappoin~ Ms. Marion Derrig, for another five-year term, on the Bremerton/Kitsap County Housing Authority, Board of Commissioners. Mayor Dawkins suggested the Plaque, presented by Puget Power the previous week to the City, be hung in the Council Conference room with Councilmen disagreeing, requesting that all plaques and presentations to the City be displayed in the showcase. Further, in response to questioning, Mayor Dawkins stated that the Showcase will be remodeled to allow the U.S.S.Bremerton Bell to remain in it's current position, enclosing the showcase so it will' again be usable. The Mayor reported that the official opening of the new City Hall Elevator occurred at 3:45 p.m. with a ribbon-cutting ceremony. He stated that two Assistant Editors of the Seattle PI/Times newspaper were in Bremerton today and personally escorted on a tour sponsored by the Bremerton Chamber of Commerce which he took part in. They were taken to the new Wastewater Treatment Plant, Olympic College campus, shown new construction happening in the area, Jackson Park and new Naval Medical Regional Facility, lunched at the Hearthstone and culminated the tour with a waterfront boat ride outlining the proposed waterfront redevelopment area. They seem impressed with other facets of the city, however, the article depicts what the observer first sees when approaching Bremerton via Ferry and exposure to the first few blocks of downtown. He noted that an Associate Editor has been appointed to do future articles on the City of Bremerton. PUBLIC RECOGNITION - 4:45 p.m. Ms. Jeanne Jackson, Chairman of the Mayor's Committee on Handicapped, praised the efforts of the present administration for their commitment in have the elevator installed. She noted that it will give handicapped and elderly the freedom to partake in City Government, something not afforded the past years. ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Bill Broughton reported that he attended the Municipal Attorney's Conference in Spokane this past week. Issues presented included Fair Labor Standards, Conflict of Interest, Criminal and DWI Standards and Age Discrimination. He felt the time was well spent and learned a lot on new laws. Councilmen noted that Mr. Broughton should be commended for being elected on the State Municipal Attorney's Board of Directors. Mr. Broughton stated that the P.S. "We Care" program will be resumed in July on a 24-hour, 365 days per year schedule. TAPE #257 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes June 26, 1985 Page 3 of 10 UNAPPROVED DRAFT He reminded Council this was the program started ~local. ly, through the cooperation of area Taxi Companies, Towing Companies, MADD Organization, Beer distributors and Bremerton Police and Attorney's departments. Purpose is to afford those who have over-indulged the opportunity to call for a "free" taxi to drive them home with a return to their vehicle in the a.m. It also provides for two of their vehicle if need be. This service is from Licensed liquor establishments in the area and the only broad-range program of it's kind in the State. He stated it was proven during the holiday season that DWI arrests were substantially reduce because of the area and commended the area business for their financial and physical support of the program. COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORTS Councilman Sturdivant reiterated that he felt the USS Bremerton bell was in the way and should be relocated. Mayor Dawkins stated the remodeling of the showcase is scheduled for the first part of July. Councilman Horning commented on the tour by executives of the Seattle PI/Times today and felt it had a positive impact for the City of Bremerton. He thanked both the Mayor and the Chamber of Commerce's leadership in having the tour scheduled. Councilman Pachek stated several Councilmen were invited guests of KOMO TV, Sunday June 23rd. as observers of a panel discussion on industry in Washington State. He noted several dignitaries who made up the panel. Questions facing the State include "what does Washington do now"; "Changes in Tax situation" and "what Industry and jobs does the State want to lobby for/against". He felt it was time well spent and noted there will be continue programs of this time in the near future. Councilman Mosely noted that he too attended the discussion along with Councilmen Pachek, Johnson, Amo and Drouin. He said statistics quoted showed the State of Washington 3rd in Liquor Tax, 8th in Cigarette tax in the United States. He took video tapes of the panel discussion and should anyone what to review they may contact him to arrange viewing. Councilman Drouin, gave tentative closures and opening ceremonies of the Wastewater Plant-facilities in the very near future. Grand opening of the new facility is still scheduled for September, 1985. ROOF REPLACEMENT QUOTATION - 1548 WARREN AVENUE BUILDING, #AB85-284 Mr. Dave Patmon stated the low quotation has been determined to be in non-compliance with City specification. The lowest quotation meeting City specifications is from Wayne's Roofing in the Amount of $24,035.09 including State sales tax. Wayne's Roofing has been used by the City on previous roof repair and replacement jobs and has performed well. Staff recommendation requested that Council award bid to Wayne's Roofing. A gentlemen from Field's Roof Service, Inc., Kent, WA. noted that the reason he was given for disqualification was that Field's crew was not' certified by "Owens-Corning" manufacture of the particular roofing materials in the specifications. He further stated, in order to meet Fire Codes, contained in the specifications, they would amend materials at their own cost to provide gravel on roof which will qualify as Class A Rating, as required on specifications. TAPE #257 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes June 26, 1985 Page 4 of 10 UNAPPROVED DRAFT #1501 City -Attorney Broughton requested a review of the specifications before advising Council.. Ms. McCluskey stated the suggested contractor, Wayne's, bid $22,296.00 whereas, Field's (lowest bidder) quoted a price of $17,908.00. Mr. Patmon noted that regardless of who is awarded the bid, there will be additional costs of repairs of any dry-rot, etc. He stated the guarantee is for 10 years and material is Owens's Corning fibreglass. Mr. Broughton stated that the responsibility of the Council, in awarding any job via the bid process, is to provide the public with services at the least possible cost. He said that because the low bidder now qualified and capable of providing the work they could be awarded bid with the understanding that~ they will absorb the cost of Fire code change and upgrade of materials. At this time, Mr. Thomas Gilmer, General Manager of Field's Roof Service, Inc., stated that the specifications for the roof repairs, did not specify, "certified" and that bid was based on original specifications as issued. He stated that Owen's/Corning, manufacturer of the roof materials, has assured him that -they will soon have the certificate in their possession. M/S/C/U/(Horning/Amo) to approve award of bid for Roof Replacement - 1548 Warren Avenue Building, to the lowest bidder, Field's Roof Service, Inc, contingent upon possession of the Owen's/Corning Certification of training at the time the repair work commences. FACILITY SPACE REALLOCATION, #AB85-285 In order to increase efficiency and better utilization of existing space the Mayor directed internal space moves to include Planning Department to Fire Station with relocation of the Fire Department Administration within Fire Station #1; Consolidation of the Municipal Court to the 2nd floor of City Hall; Expansion of Administrative Services into space given up by the Municipal Court; Reallocation and consolidation of Engineering Department; Movement of Director Public Works/Field Services to 1548 Warren Avenue Building and Movement of the City Auditor to the old Field Services office. The rationale for these moves, along with the total cost of each move is shown in Exhibits A-1 and A- 2, on file in the City Clerk's office. Mr. Court Prisk emphasized that some departments could not possibly run efficiently, for example Municipal Court which was located in 3 separate areas. This department has noted less error, better organization and improved accountability. Councilman Johnson, Amo, Anderson and Sturdivant expressed concern that the moves have taken place already and now Staff is asking for funding to cover the project. Staff recommended allocation of $20,875.00 to the Facilities Division Budget from unappropriated General Fund Carryover. Councilman Johnson asked Mayor Dawkins by what authority he made the decision before seeking approval from the City Council. Mayor Dawkins stated he checked with the City Treasurer to see if a funding source was available which the Treasurer concurred. Council did not object to the need but the methodology used and circumventing normal budget request procedures. Mr. Court Prisk, Field Services Director, noted that staff would not have done remodeling or moving without evaluating increase in efficiency and production. Councilman Johnson countered that the move is a good idea, however, normal mode is to get authorization first, not after money is spent. Councilman Sturdivant stated it was time for the Council to deny the request and felt that the Mayor is directly TAPE #257 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes June 26, 1985 Page 5 of 10 UNAPPROVED DRAFT #2257 · #2833 · responsible for the error. Mayor Dawkins defended the action reminding Councilmen they do not work in City Hall and are probably not aware of the conditions employees were previously faced with, such as lack of space, poor facilities, etc. Mayor Dawkins stated that the Fire Department gave up it's new Administration building to enable the One-Stop Permit center to be implemented; Municipal Court was housed in three separate locations and stated he would take the responsibility for the decision. Councilman Amo expressed concern that the Council recently hired a firm to do a facilities study and no action should have been taken until the study is complete because through Arai-Jackson, firm contracted, they may have a total different concept which could be costly or redundant. Councilman Anderson concurred. Councilman Drouin reminded Council that it had been pushing for the One-Stop Permit center, but he too agreed it should have been approved prior to the moving of departments. Council Amo and Sturdivant stated they would opposed to request. M/S/C/(Drouin/Mosely) to approve the allocation of $20,875.00 to the Facilities Division Budget, #001-49-518- 3q-3310 from Unappropriated General Fund Carryover. VOTE: In favor; Horning, Pachek, Mosely, Anderson & Drouin Opposed; Amo and Sturdivant Abstain; Johnson Motion PASSED. PURCHASE PUBLIC ACCESS TO STATE OWNED TIDELANDS - ALEA GRANT FUNDS, RESOLUTION #2072 - #AB85-286 The City needs undisputed access rights to the downtown waterfront over 2nd and 4th Streets between Washington Avenue and the Inner Harbor line. Aquatic Land Enhancement Account (ALEA) grants are available to aid the City in acquiring fee or easement access. The City Council must give the Planning Department approval to apply for the maximum grant available ($75,000) because a 25% match would be required from Block Grant funds should acquisition costs satisfactory to the Council be negotiated. Mr. Jack'Maher, Waterfront Development Manager, addressed Council asking that CounCil approve Planning Department application for the ALEA Grant, requiring a $25,000 match for the purpose of acquiring undisputed ownership of 2nd. Street between Washington Avenue and the Inner Harbor Line and pedestrian access from the easterly street stub of 4th Street to the Inner Harbor Line. He noted that Council would have to approve each acquisition after satisfactory negotiations as a budget item. Planning Director, Don Pratt stated that the 25% matching funds are in hand in the form of Mr. Maher's salary and dollars allocation to the downtown redevelopment. He stated this will be specifically for the 2nd and 4th street accesses to the waterfront where additional properties will need to be acquisitioned. Councilman Mosely reminded constituents that Council is not committed until funds are approved. M/S/C/U/(Mosely/Pache]~) to trade Waterfront Development Manager's budget for the $25,000 match for the purpose of acquiring undisputed ownership of 2nd Street between Washington Avenue and the Inner Harbor Line and pedestrian access from th5 easterly street stub of 4th Street to the Inner Harbor Line. Recessed at 5:52 p.m.; Reconvened at 6:10 p.m. TAPE #257 & #2L City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes June 26, 1985 Page 6 of 10 UNAPPROVED DRAFT TAPE #258 #1490 #1922 · HEARING - REQUEST FOR REZONE R-1 TO B-2 - APPLICANT, PAUL A. SCHMIDT, 1040 HANFORD - #AB85-278 Council President Anderson asked the standard "Conflict" question with all Councilmen remaining seated. Mr. Bob- Duffy, Planner, presented staff report on the request by Mr. Schmidt. He stated the property is located at 1040 Hanford Avenue, near the N.W. corner of Wheaton Way and Hanford Avenue and his intention ~Schmidt) is to construct an professional office building. Pl'anning Commission at it's April 16, 1985, meeting unanimously denied the application. The subject site has been used for residential uses in the past and is served by all common urban utilities. A more extensive report per. Planning Resolution #747 is on file in the Planning Department. Mr. David Grallier, Architect representing Mr. Schmidt, spoke in favor of the proposal stating the property is not suited for residential as now zoned. There is becoming strong pressure on the area for commercial development. B-2 rezone offers type of development happening along Wheaton Way with some areas already designated B-3. Consistent with applicant's intent to development an office structure, there is adequate parking, site will be adequately buffered with greenbelt and used mainly for daytime uses. Mr. Paul Schmidt, applicant/owner of subject site, stated that property is within 150' of commercial and those objecting to the rezone are already faced with traffic diversion, off Wheaton Way, noise pollution from Arby's and Kitsap County Bank, and felt the decision by the Planning Commission was based solely on public input and not consideration of the fact this area is becoming highly commercial. He stated that if Council upheld the decision of the Planning Commission he would build 4 duplexes on the site which would cause more density than now exists. He appealed to the Council to approve the requested rezone. Those speaking in opposition of the rezone included, Mr. Randy Loun, Ms. Virginia Ockerman, Mr. Henry Horner, Mr. Henry Cummings, Mr. Glenn Magnuson, and Ms. McCluskey read into the record letters of opposition from Ms. Mary Zable, Mr. & Mrs. Ed Ockerman and Mr. & Mrs. John Peabody, on file in the Planning Department. Councilman Drouin noted that the Engineering department found problems with the proposed rezone. Councilman Anderson, Councilman Amo and Councilman Pachek all stated they were familiar with the area and that the residential area is well kept and this street can hardly be compared to Hollis (off Wheaton) where the whole area is zoned commercial. Councilman Anderson asked if rezone, could the applicant be held to site's intended use with City Attorney Bill Broughton stating no! M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Mosely) to deny request for rezone from R-1 to B-2, 1040 Hanford, Applicant Paul Schmidt. ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS, REQUIREMENTS, OBLIGATIONS, FOR OPERATION OF CABLE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, #AB85-287 An Ordinance, first reading, was presented to Council establishing conditions, requirements, obligations for operation of cable communication system. Non-passage would mean less control over Cable operations and dollars, however if approved, the City would realize an increase in Franchise fees and there would be moderate increase in staff time to monitor franchise. TAPE #258 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes June 26, 1985 Page 7 of 10 UNAPPROVED DRAFT #2269 #2454 #2758 #2858 Mr. Lon Hurd, representative from 3-H Cable Consultants, stated he worked with the Franchise Committee consisting of Councilmen Russ Johnson and Jim Adrian, City Attorney Bill Broughton, Field Services Director Court Prisk and Director of Administrative Services Kathleen McCluskey. The committee recommended approval of the ordinance at it.'s Council Study Session June 10, 1985. M/S/C/U/(Sturdivant/Johnson) to approve, first reading, an Ordinance establishing the conditions, requirements, obligations, duties for construction, maintenance and operation of a cable communication and distribution system within the City and granting the right, privilege, and authority to a franchisee to construction, operate, maintain and use poles, conduits, cables, wires and other incidental equipment in, upon, under, over, along and across streets, avenues, boulevards, alleys and other public places of the City of Bremerton. This Ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 3191 relating to Community Antenna Systems Franchise. ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) GRANTING FRANCHISE TO NATIONWIDE CABLEVISION, #AB85-288 M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Mosely) to approve first reading, an Ordinance of the City of Bremerton, granting a non exclusive franchise to construct, install and operate lines, wires, coaxial cable and appurtenances for originating, receiving, distributing and supplying radio, television and other cable communication services along, across and upon the Public's streets, ways, alleys, and places within the City of Bremerton. Ms. McCluskey noted that the two previous ordinances, regarding Cable Franchise, will not return for second reading until July 17, 1985 because of Charter restrictions. ORDINANCE #3967 (SECOND READING) - CITY PERSONNEL CODE OF ETHICS, #AB85-252 Ordinance #3967 regarding City Personnel Ethics was approved on first reading, June 5, 1985, as amended by Councilman Adrian. It returned to Council on June 12, 1985, with additional amendments and tabled for June 26th. Ms. McCluskey noted the changes prior to this meeting to include (1) Pg. 8, Para 3(a) (top of pg) Exempt elected officials from the prohibition of soliciting help in municipal elections; (2) Pg. 9, Para 8 - (top of page) Includes the Planning Commission in prohibiting ex parte contacts , and (3) Pg. 19, Sec. 13 - The section was rewritten to clarify the requirements for notification of City personnel. In addition (4) Pg. 10, Sec 6(1), deleting "and subject to confirmation by a majority of the City Council". M/S/C/U/(Sturdivant/Amo) to strike verbiage, Pg. 10, Sec6(1) "and subject to confirmation by a majority of the City Council". M/S/C/U/(Sturdivant/Drouin) to pass Ordinance #3967, second reading, as amended, creating a code of ethics, requiring disclosure of financial interests, establishing an ethics commission, providing for criminal and civil sanctions and penalties for violations, and adding a new chapter to the Bremerton Municipal Code, and amending Pg. 8, Para 3(a), Page 9, Para~8 and Pg. 19, Sec. 13 as outlined above. Council President Anderson noted that #9D - Planned Unit Development Chapter to Zoning Ordinance has been pulled at Study Session, to be resubmitted in two weeks. PARKING ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) AMENDING CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE, #AB85-259 TAPE #258 & #25 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes June 26, 1985 Page 8 of 10 UNAPPROVED DRAFT TAPE ~259 #0540 · #0903 · In order to amend the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance and provide for new off-street parking and loading requirements, it was necessary to amend all sections of the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 1792) and subsequent amendments to that Ordinance which pertain to off-street parking requirements. It was accordingly necessary to (1) amend Ordinance No. 2297 which was enacted in 1958 and amend the off-street parking requirements set forth in the Bremerton Zoning Ordinance, and (2) Ordinance No. 3732 which set forth parking requirements for the Residential Townhouse District. Councilman Horning suggested tabling until next week. Mr. Isaac Soriano, 520 Burwell, became upset with the suggestion stating these ordinances relating to parking have been on the drawing board for two years and it is time for Council to take action. He noted that the Soriano's have purchased parking and made available to citizens and felt other property owners and businesses would do the same. Mr. Howard Hager, recommended that the Council deal with the downtown parking CBD, (Central Business District), as a separate issue and hope Councilmen would make a decision tonight. He stated if Public was against, they would indicate tonight. Mr. Herb Effron supported Mr. Soriano and Mr. Hager in Council approving, this meeting. Mr. Rich McDonald, General Mgr. Bremer's Inc., felt this was an important issue with "Mainstreet" in place and concurs with Mr. Soriano. He thought Council needed to make a decision, sending a clear message, in order to attract commercial interests to the downtown core. Mr. Don Pratt, Planning Director, thought Planning department was to wait for Council direction. M/(Amo) to approve, first reading, Agenda items #9E and #9F as presented. Motion DIED FOR LACK OF SECOND. Councilman Horning felt comfortable dealing with the CBD parking ordinance tonight, but not the rest of the ordinance. Councilman Anderson thought it was imperative that Council proceed carefully. Mr. Soriano could not understand another delay. Mr. Jerry Soriano, concurred, stating several concerned businessmen/property owners have continually attended Council meetings with postponement after postponement and objection to another continuance. Councilmen requested Ms. McCluskey to read Page 19, Sec. B and Section C. Section B deals with the "Intent" of the ordinance and Section C deals with it's "Provisions". Copy is on file in the City Clerk's office. Councilman Sturdivant stated #9E, Section #11 (of the Ordinance) is clear. M/(Sturdivant) to approve Agenda Bill #9E, Section #11, was; Ruled OUT OF ORDER. Mr. Pete Flynn, project "Mainstreet" Coordinator, asked that City Council deal with the CBD issue separately. City Attorney Bill Broughton stated Ordinance should be amended as follows: "An ordinance which amends Title II, Chapter VII of Ordinance No. 1792, by adding a new Section, regulating parking in the Central Business District". SECTION 1: Short Title. This Ordinance may be referred to as The Downtown Parking Requirement Ordinance. TAPE #259 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes June 26, 1985 Page 9 of i0 UNAPPROVED DRAFT #1101 #1321 SECTION 2: Ordinance No. 1792, Title II, Chapter VII, is hereby amended to add a new section as follows: SECTION 3: A. Intent Circumstances make the Central Business District different from the remainder of Bremerton in the following ways: 1. That there exists a concentration of transit.- 2. There exists a concentration of private commercial parking facilities. 3. There is the availability of public parking. 4. There are land resources substantially developed in a manner which makes it unreasonable to require off-street parking as a condition to the use of the individual lots. 5. The Central Business District is, and should continue to be, a concentrated area of retail, office, and other approved uses in a pedestrian scaled environment. 6. The Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, the County's largest employer, is adjacent to the Central Business District and both provides substantial on-site parking and pro- duces large numbers of pedestrians at certain periods of the day. Because of these factors, but still recognizing the need to provide parking to serve the needs of Central Business District and provide for the public health, safety and welfare, a different set of off-street parking and loading regulations shall apply to the Central Business District. B. .Provisions 1. Within the geographic bounds of the Central Business District is identified. in this section, there shall be no required parking for Structures or uses, nor shall parking be required for rehabilitated or remodeled structures, or when obtaining a certificate of occupancy. 2. No loading zones are required. M/S/C/(Drouin/Mosely) to approve Ordinance, first reading, as outlined above, which amends Title II, Chapter VII of Ordinance No. 1792, by adding a new section regulating parking in the Central Business District. VOTE: In favor; Sturdivant, Horning, Pachek, Mosely, Anderson and Drouin Opposed; Amo and Johnson Motion PASSED. M/S/C/(Horning/Pachek) to table rest of Agenda Bill #9E, #9F and #9G for 2 weeks. VOTE: In favor; Sturdivant, Horning, Pachek, Mosely, AndersOn and Drouin Abstain; Amo and Johnson Motion PASSED. RESOLUTION #2070 - BUDGET GOALS & OBJECTIVES FOR FY86, #AB85-291 The Budget Goals and Objectives have been developed by the Fiscal and Budget Committee and staffed through the managers of the Administration. Additionally, drafts of these goals and objectives have been provided to all Council members for review and comment. All comments have been considered and all incorporated into the final proposal before Council. The Fiscal and Budget Committee recommended adoption of these goals and objectives. TAPE #259 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes June 26, 1985 Page 10 of 10 UNAPPROVED DRAFT #1390 · #1432 · M/S/C/U/(Johnson/Drouin) to approve Resolution establishing the Budget Goals and Objectives Bremerton City Council for Fiscal Year 1986. #2070, of the RESOLUTION #2071 - BUDGET CALENDAR FOR FY86, #AB85-292 Pursuant to Council Policy and RCW direction, it is the responsibility of the Council to formally establish an annual Budget calendar. The City of Bremerton 1986 Budget Calendar has been prepared by the Fiscal and Budget Committee in close cooperation with key officials of the Administration. the Fiscal and Budget Committee recommends Council adopt the attached Resolution to establish the 1986 Budget Calendar, copy on file in the City Clerk's office. M/S/C/U/(Pachek/Mosely) to approve the adoption of Resolution #2071, establishing the Budget Calendar for the preparation of the Fiscal Year 1986 Budget. With no further business, meeting adjourned at 8:49 p.m. KATHLEEN L. MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk City of Bremerton APPROVED: ART ANDERSON, President City Council KLM:AA/cjs cc Normal Distribution File/Vault