HomeMy WebLinkAbout4525
Contract Number:
Vendor:
Subject:
Department:
File Class:
Begin Date:
End Date:
Review Date:
Vault Date:
Comments:
4525
HDR ENGINEERING INC
Water System Plan & Regulatory Tech Evaluation
Water Resources
LEG 12-1
11/16/2005
04/30/2008
02/15/2010
01/01/2010
Amendment #1-1/08 #2-7/08
-,
AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR
WATER SYSTEM PLAN AND REGULATORY TECHNICAL EVALUATION
The City of Bremerton, Washington ("City") and HDR Engineering ("Consultant")
have entered into a Professional Services Agreement, hereinafter referred to as
Agreement for a project described as Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical
Evaluation.
This Amendment Number 2 modifies the Scope of Work and Budget set forth in
the Agreement dated September 12, 2005, as follows:
The Scope of Work shall be modified to add additional scope items as outlined in
the attached Amendment Number 2.
The Compensation for Services shall be increased by $3,000 and the total fees
under this Agreement shall not exceed two hundred twenty-two thousand five hundred
and fifty-two dollars ($222,552).
Except as herein modified, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Amendment
Number 2 to the Professional Services Agreement the date and year indicated.
/"
For HDR, dated this q1 day of
By:
--.--.
For the City of Bremerton, dated this ~ay of ~,J<!.. r
By: ~Ze~'MaYOr --,
pEPAR~fJ~ APPROVAL:
~,~if~
Phil Williams, Director of Public Works and Utilities Department
S T01RM:
RECEIVED FOR FILING:
~~J
Carol Etge , City Clerk
....
"'.
Amendment Number 2
Scope of Work
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
The objective of the project for this amendment is extended analysis needed to complete the
technical evaluation of disinfection by-products sample results and trends. Upon review of
existing data a more extensive analysis was merited to provide more meaningful conclusions and
to introduce additional monitoring and control strategies for the City to address compliance with
the Stage 2 Disinfectant/Disinfection By-products Rule.
Vendor
Subject
Department
Status Code
Amount
Begin Date
End Date
Review Date
Insurance
Comments
Contract Number 4525
HDR ENGINEERING INC
Water System Plan & Regulatory Tech Evaluation
Water Resources
PRO File Class LEG 12-1
$219552.00
11/16/2005
04/30/2008
05/01/2008
GL
AL
E&O
$2000000.00
$2000000.00
$1000000.00
Insurance Total
Insurance Review Date
$5000000.00
06/01/2008
Amendment #1-1/08
AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR
'Vater System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
The City of Bremerton, Washington, (the "City"), and HDR Engineering, ("Consultant") have
entered into a PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, hereinafter referred to as
AGREEMENT for a project described as Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical
Evaluation.
This AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 modifies the Scope of Wark and Budget set forth in the
AGREEMENT dated September 12, 2005, as follows:
The Scope of Work shall be modified to add additional scope items as outlined in the attached
Amendment Number 1.
The Compensation for services shall be increased by $14,743 and the total fees under this
Agreement shall not exceed two hlmdred nineteen thousand five hundred and fifty-two dollars
($219,552).
Except as herein modified, the terms of the AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 to
the Professional Services Agreement the date and year indicated.
For HDR, dated this 1'7
day of ~C--" , 2007.
By 0Lf'LPg
For the City ofBremerton, dated this ~
daYO~
By: Cary zeman, Mayor
----
~E~~V~:
Phil Williams, Director of Public Works and Utilities
:i:~AST~JM
C" Atto y
Amendment Number 1
SCOPE OF WORK
1.0 Introduction
The overall objective of this project is to provide the City of Bremerton with an evaluation of
available data for trends and to assist in identifYing ways to optimize system operations, water
age, source selection, and/or disinfection to reduce formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs)
while also meeting coliform and Surface Water Treatment Rule requirements. This work will
assist Bremerton in complying with the Stage 2 Disinfection By-product Rule. The approach is
divided into two phases of work and includes the following tasks:
1.1 Phase I - Evaluate Data and Screen for Optimization
Opportunities
Task 1 - Update and Review Available Water Quality Data and System Information
Task 2 - Evaluate Trends and Screen for Possible Optimization Opportunities
Task 3 - Prepare Technical Memorandum
Task 4 - Project Management and Quality Control
1.2 Phase II - Identify and Evaluate Optimization Strategies
(Optional, Future)
Task 5 - Develop a Water Quality Monitoring Plan
Task 6 - Perform Bench-Scale DBP Formation Tests
. Task 7 - Conduct Hydraulic Modeling
Task 8 - Perform Detailed Evaluation for Optimizing Specific Treatment Processes and
Operations
The current scope of services and fee estimate addresses only Phase I - Evaluate
Data and Screen for Optimization Opportunities.
2.0 Phase I - Evaluate Data and Screen for Optimization
Opportunities
2.1 Task 1- Update and Review Available Water Quality Data and
System Information
The objective of this task is to update and review available water quality data and system
information that pertain to formation ofDBPs in the main Bremerton system.
HDR Services
1. Prepare a data request for updated water quality data and system information.
2. If needed, develop a monitoring plan that indicates specific water quality
parameters and monitoring locations in the Bremerton system. This
monitoring plan would be intended only to fill any immediate data gaps to
allow for preliminary assessment. If more detailed or focused monitoring is
deemed necessary, a plan would be developed as part of Phase II.
3. Review Bremerton's current system operations and updated water quality data
and reports pertaining to formation ofDBPs.
4. Review existing and proposed water treatment methods and operations.
5. Conduct a conference call with the City to confirm data and understanding of
system.
City Responsibilities
1. Provide a minimum of the most recent 24 months of requested water quality
data (i.e., updated water quality data), treatment, and operational information.
2. Participate in a conference call to discuss updated water quality data and
existing and planned future conditions and operations.
3. Conduct additional monitoring, if needed, to provide sufficient water quality
data for this evaluation.
Assumptions
1. Sufficient data and information regarding water quality, treatment and
operations ofthe Bremerton will be available for review.
2. This review will build upon previous work conducted as part of the 2005
Bremerton Water System Plan Update, IDSE Report (2006), and the previous
investigation ofDBPs in the Bremerton system conducted by EES (2001).
3. Hydraulic modeling will not be conducted as part of this task. An assessment
of flow conditions will be made based on the City's understanding of
operations and available records or SCADA data of supply production.
2.2 Task 2 - Evaluate Trends and Screen for Possible Optimization
Opportunities
The objective of this task is to evaluate trends in updated water quality data and provide
a preliminary screening of possible optimization opportunities for reducing formation of
DBPs while simultaneously meeting other regulatory requirements.
HDR Services
1. Evaluate trends in updated water quality data relative to historical
performance of the Bremerton system.
2. Perform a preliminary assessment of primary factors that traditionally
contribute to formation of DBPs and attempt to identify possible causative
factors for the observed variable and generally-increasing DBP trends.
City Responsibilities
1. Provide additional relevant information as requested and needed.
2. Assist with evaluation of water quality trends and assessment of possible
causative factors in the formation of DBPs in the Bremerton system.
Assumptions
1. Sufficient data and information regarding water quality, treatment and
operations of the Bremerton will be available for review.
2.3 Task 3 - Prepare Technical Memorandum
The objective of this task is to prepare draft and final technical memorandums that
document the assumptions, methods, findings, conclusions, and recommendations as
related to the formation ofDBPs in the Bremerton system.
HDR Services
1. Summarize updated data, findings, conclusions, and recommendations based
on this evaluation.
2. Prepare a draft technical memorandum (approximately 3-5 pages) for review
by the City of Bremerton.
3. Meet with City staff to discuss the draft tech memo.
4. Integrate Bremerton's comments into a tech memo.
City Responsibilities
1. Review the draft tech memo.
2. Meet with HDR to discuss findings, conclusions, and recommendations.
3. Provide one set of written, non-conflicting comments on the draft tech memo.
Deliverables
1. A draft and final tech memo, to be transmitted to the City as an electronic file.
2.4 Task 4 - Project Management and Quality Control
The objective of this task is to manage the project and ensure quality control (QC).
HDR Services
1. Manage the Project to track the scope, budget, and schedule.
2. Prepare monthly status reports and invoices.
3. Notify Bremerton of budget or schedule issues, or out of scope requirements
in the monthly status report.
4. Conduct QC reviews on all deliverables.
City Responsibilities
1. Review and pay the invoices in a timely manner.
2. Work with the HDR Project Manager to review and negotiate scope changes.
Deliverables
1. Monthly invoices and status reports.
2. Bi-weekly phone meetings to discuss progress.
3.0 Schedule
Assuming a start date of January 15, 2008, a draft report for Phase I will be submitted to the City
by March 16, 2008. It is anticipated that the proposed follow-up meeting and final Phase I report
will be completed by April 30, 2008.
4.0 Fee
The fee for completing the sc;ope of services for Phase I as described above is shown in the table
below. An estimated fee for the Phase IT tasks was not developed because the need for and the
extent of these tasks are dependent on the findings in Phase 1.
Bremerton - Water Quality Evaluation - DBPs Labor Direct Estimated
Hours Costs Fee
Task I - Update and Review Data & Information 14 $52 $2,526
Task 2 - Evaluate Trends & Screen Optimization Opportunities 36 $133 $6,471
Task 3 - Prepare Technical Memorandum 20 $144 $3,704
Task 4 - Project Management and QC 16 $59 $2,042
Total 86 $388 $14,743
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
tEnter Search Criteria, Press Esc Key to Transmit - -
tPress Del Key to Terminate Delete Mode - -
, , CHANGE Contract Transactions --
- - Contract Number 4525 - -
t =1=
,'Vendor Name HDR ENGINEERING INC 9=
"Subject WATER SYSTEM PLAN & REGULATORY TECH EVALUATION :::-:
, ,Department WATER RESOURCES - -
"Status Code PRO =1=
. - Amount $204809.00 t
T Begin Date 11/16/2005 ,',
t Insurance End Date 12/31/2007 ==
t Type Amount Review Date 12/01/2007 ==
t Press F1 for GL $2000000.00 - -
t valid insuranceAL $2000000.00 - -
t type codes E&O $1000000.00 - -
9= Insurance Total $5000000.00 T
- - Insurance Review Date 06/01/2006 9=
- - - -
t Comments - -
t t
t ,.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
"'"
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
The City of Bremerton ("City") and HDR ("Consultant"), referred to collectively as the
"Parties," enter into the following Agreement for professional services:
I. Scope: The Consultant agrees to perform the services more specifically described in the
Scope of Work, dated September 12, 2005, including any attachments thereto, attached hereto as
Exhibit A, which is incorporated by reference herein. The Scope of Work may be modified only
pursuant to Section VII. G. of this Agreement. If the Scope of Work provides for unspecified
additional services such services shall only be performed upon the express written request of the
City. Consultant further represents that the services furnished under this Agreement will be
performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices in effect at the time such
services are performed.
II. Term: The City and the Consultant agree that work will begin on the tasks described in
Exhibit A immediately upon execution of this Agreement. The parties agree that the work
described in Exhibit A is to be completed as provided for in the work schedule attached hereto as
Exhibit B; provided however, that additional time shall be granted by the City for excusable
delays or extra work as provided for in section IX (A) of this agreement.
ill. Compensation: In consideration of the services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the
City shall pay Consultant in an amount not to exceed $204,809. Consultant's charges and bills
shall conform to the fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this
reference.
The Consultant shall submit regular billing statements qetailing work performed and
amount charged on each task or portion thereof. The descriptions shall conform to and fall
within the categories set out in the Scope of Work and/or Fee Schedule. Upon receipt of a
conforming billing statement, the City shall promptly process payment. PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, the City reserves the right to prioritize sCioped work and accelerate and/or delay
work t~sks under the time frame set forth in Section II herein. The Consultant's labor rates and
billing fees shall be as delineated in Exhibit C.
Consultant shall not perform work beyond the Scope of Work, nor shall be compensated
for such work, unless the Scope of Work or amount of compensation is modified pursuant to this
Agreement. Consultant shall only be compensated for additional services if requested pursuant
to Section I and, if not otherwise provided, such compensation shall be in. accordance with
ExPibit C.
If a billing statement does not conform to this Agreement, the City may withhold
payment until the statement is brought into compliance. Such withholding does not relieve
Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 1 of21
I
I
IV. Relationship of Parties: Consultant shall perform services with the same skill and care
ordinarily used by members of the Consultant's profession under the same circumstances.
Consultant and its personnel are independent Consultants and not employees of the City.
Consultant and its personnel have no authority to bind the City or to control the City's employees
and other Consultants. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, but
not limited to, compensation, insurance, and unemployment insurance are available ftom the
City to the employees, agents, representatives, or sub-Consultants of the Consultant. Consultant
will be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Consultant's agents,
employees, representatives and sub-Consultants during the performance of this Agreement. The
City may, during the term of this Agreement, engage other independent Consultants to perform
the same or similar work.
As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for its own management. The
City's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of
managerial control over Consultant or its personnel.
As an independent Consultant, Consultant is responsible for payment of all taxes and
licensing fees necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement. These taxes and fees
include but are not limited to State industrial insurance, Business & Occupation, State
professional licensing, and City business licensing. If any taxes or fees due the City have been
declared delinquent, the City may withhold the delinquent amount, plus any additional charges
arising from the delinquency, from any payments due Consultant.
v. Indemnification: Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages,
losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, to the extent caused by the negligent
performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the
City's negligence. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City from the
Consultant's breach of its obligations under this Agreement.
The City's review or acceptance of any of the work when completed shall not be grounds
to avoid any of these covenants of indemnification.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to
RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons
or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant
and the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, the Consultant's liability
hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence.
IT IS FURTHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE
INDEMNIFICATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONSTITUTES THE CONSULTANT'S
WAIVER OF IMMUNITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, TITLE 51 RCW, SOLELY
FOR THE PURPOSES OF TillS INDEMNIFICATION. THE PARTIES FURTHER
ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE MUTUALLY NEGOTIATED TillS WAIVER
The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 2 of21
I
~
/Q
~
VI. Insurance: The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, ~
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in ("
connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, employees, sub-consultants or sub-Consultants.
Before beginning work on the project described in this Agreement, the Consultant shall
provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing:
1. Automobile Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 combined single
limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and
2. Commercial General Liability insurance written on an occurrence basis with limits no
less than $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence and general aggregate for
personal injury, bodily injury and property damage. Coverage shall include but not be
limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations/broad form property
damage; explosion, collapse and underground (XCU) if applicable; and employer's
liability; and
3. Excess Liability insurance with limits n<;>t less than 1,000,000 limit per occurrence and
aggregate.
4. Professional Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 limit per claim.
Any payment of deductible or self insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the
Consultant.
All required policies shall be provided on an "occurrence" basis except professional
liability insurance (if required), which may be provided on a "claims-made" basis.
The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability
insurance policy, as respects work performed by or on behalf of the Consultant and a copy of an
endorsement that is acceptable to the City, which names the City as an additional insured shall be
attached to the Certificate of Insurance. The City reserves the right to receive a certified copy of
all the required insurance policies and endorsements. The City further reserves the right to reject
any unacceptable policies and/or endorsements.
The Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance shall contain a clause stating
that coverage shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is
brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer's liability.
The Consultant's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City and the City
shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, of
any cancellation, suspension or material change in coverage.
The City also reserves its unqualified right to require at any time and for any reason,
proof of coverage in the form of a duplicate of the insurance policy with all endorsements as
evidence of coverage.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 3 of21
1
i/"")
t,..::::(\
r;/
#0
VII. General Conditions: .-./1/
IV """
A., Reports and Information: When requested by the City, Consultant shall furnish)-(
periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and
documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. Consultant shall maintain
accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to
substantiate all billed amounts.
B. Owner~hip and Use of Records and Documents: Final documents, drawings, designs
and reports, including those in electronic format, developed under this Agreement as described in
Exhibit A, Scope of Work are the property of the City, All written information submitted by the
City to the Consultant in connection with the services performed by the Consultant under this
Agreement will be safeguarded by the Consultant to at least the same extent as the Consultant
safeguards like information relating to its own busine~s. If such information is publicly available
or is already in Consultant's possession or known to it, or is rightfully obtained by the Consultant
from third parties, Consultant shall bear no responsibility for its disclosure, inadvertent or
otherwise.
All data, documents and files created by Consultant under this Agreement may be stored
at Consultant's office in Bellevue, Washington, Consultant shall make such data, documents,
and files available to the City upon its request at all reasonable times for the purpose of editing,
modifying and updating as necesSary until such time as the City is capable of storing such
information in the City's offices. Duplicate copies of this information shall be provided to the
City upon its request, and at reasonable cost.
All final documents, including all reports, drawings, prepared or furnished by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement, ate instruments of service with respect to the project and are the
property of the City. Any reuse by the City for other than the specific purpose intended will be
at City's sole risk.
C. Work Performed at Consultant's Risk: Coq.sultant shall take all precautions necessary
and shall be. responsible for the safety of its employees, agents, and sub-consultants in the
performance of the work hereunder and shall utilize all protection necessary for that purpose.
All work shall be done at Consultant's own risk, and Consultant shall be responsible for any loss
of or damage to materials, tools, or other articles used or held for use in connection with the
work.
D. Place of Work: The Consultant shall perform the work authorized under this
Agreement at its offices in Bellevue, Washington. Meetings with the City staff as described in
Exhibit A, Scope of Work, shall take place at the City's offices, or at locations mutually agreed
upon by the parties.
E. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement
between the Parties, and the Parties acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or
Qral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 4 of21
% I
0~
F, Severability: Should any part of this Agreemeot be found void, the balance of the ~
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. <
G. Modification: This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by
both Parties.
H. Written Notices: All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the
parties at the addresses listed below by registered or 1 st class mail, or by personal service, and
shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement
or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing.
City Address: Consultant Address:
Public Works and Utilities Department HDR Engineering, Inc.
3027 Olympus Drive 500 10gth Avenue NE Suite 1200
Bremerton, W A 98310 Bellevue, W A 98004-5549
I. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a
waiver of that provision. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be
deemed waiver of any other right or power.
J. Non-Waiver of Breach: The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any
of the covenants and agreements contained herein, or to exercise any option herein conferred in
one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of said covenants,
agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect.
K. Compliance with Laws: Consultant shall comply with all applicable Federal, State,
and local laws in performing its obligations under this Agreement.
L Choice of Law and Venue: This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws
ofthe State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement
shall be brought in Kitsap County Superior Court.
M. Attorneys' Fees: IIi the event of litigation to enforce any of the terms or provisions
herein, each party sh~ll pay all its own costs and C}.ttorney's fees.
N. Assignment: Any assignment of this agreement by the Contractor without the written
consent of the City shall be void.
VID. Nondiscrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate in employment or services to the
public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, or disability,
except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification.
IX. Termination: This Agreement shall remain in force until completion and acceptance of
the services, terminated by written instrument upon mutual consent, or by the City of Bremerton
for convenience. This Agreement may be immediately terminated for cause by a Party if the
other Party substantially fails to perform through no fault of the terminating Party, and the non-
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 5 of21
L__.___.
%
Q
"A
perfotming Party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within thirty (30) ~ j,/""
days of the terminating Party's sending notice to the non-performing Party. Any Notice by '-;;,,/
Consultant shall include a report showing the status of all items listed in the Scope of Work <:
current through the termination date.
If the City receives reimbursement by any federal, state, or other source for work described in
Section I herein, and that funding is withdrawn, reduced or limited in any way, or the project is
cancelled or substantially reduced after the execution date of this Agreement and prior to the
completion of the work, the City may summarily terminate this Agreement.
A. Excusable Delays: The right of Consultant to proceed shall not be terminated nor shall
Consultant be charged with liquidated damages for any delays in the completion of the work due
to: 1) any acts of the federal government in controlling, restricting, or requisitioning materials,
equipment, tools, or labor by reason of war, national defense, or other national emergency; 2)
any acts of the City, its consultants, or other public agencies causing such delay; and 3) causes
not reasonably foreseeable by the parties at the time of the execution of the Agreement that are
beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not
restricted to, acts of God, fires, floods, strikes, or weather of unusual severity. PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, that the Consultant must promptly notify the City within ten (10) calendar days in
writing of the cause of the delay. If, on the basis of the facts and the terms of this Agreement,
the delay is properly excusable, the City shall, in writing, extend the time for completing the
work for a period oftime commensurate with the period of excusable delay.
B. Rights Upon Termination: In the event of termination, the City shall pay for all
services performed by the Consultant to the effective date of termination, as described on a final
invoice submitted to the City. After termination, the City may take possession of all records and
data within the Consultant's possession pertaining to this project which may be used by the City
without restriction. Any such use not related to the project which Consultant was contracted to
perform shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant.
CONSULT ANT
By: ~ f~l~eP~~~:
its: ~ /!}if. -
Date: Date: 16{17/o/
/
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 6 of21
I
(/
~~
Q
0~
It:/' ~
Exhibit A .~/
/
Scope of Work
Water System Plan and Regulatory
City of Bremerton W A
September 12, 2005
PROJECT OBJECTIVE
The objective ofthis project is to work with the City ofBremerton (City) staff to update selected
sections of the 1999 Water System Plan and contribute to the development of a useful,
comprehensive, long-range water supply and delivery strategy for the City. This Scope presents
the HDR/EES approach for fulfilling this objective within nine specified areas (Tasks 1.0-9.0).
The Scope of Work is comprised of the Task,s listed below:
. Task 1.0 - System Analysis
. Task 2.0 - Water Conservation
. Task 3.0 - Water Quality Review and Regulatory Compliance
. Task 4.0 ~ LT2ESWTR Compliance Strategy and Preliminary Design
. Task 5.0 - Cross Connection Control
. Task 6.0 :- Financial Pro~ram
. Task7.0 - Review of Draft WSP
. Task 8.0 - Project Management
. Task 9.0 - Supplemental Assistance
TASK 1.0 - SYSTEM ANALYSIS
This task includes all work related to the verification of distribution system facilities, collection
of field fire flow information, model calibration, model simulations, and development of Capital
Improvement Projects.
Consultant Services
1. Receive model files from City and confirm that information is accurate based on
information on system facilities provided by the City.
2. Assist City in determining locations for calibration fire flow tests and provide assistance
perfotming calibration fire flow tests.
3. Edit model based on the results of the calibration fire flow tests to obtain a calibrated
hydraulic model.
4. Develop demand allocation process that will allow future demands to be inserted in the
model in a manner that reflects the future distribution of population using Traffic
Analysis Zones, or other similar population distribution method.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 70f21
0
1%:
~
5. Perform a source and storage calculation in accordance with Department of Health ~
(DOH) requirements to determine if any deficiencies exist. e (/"
6. Run simulations of the existing distribution system to determine existing available fire \
flow during Peak Day DemanQ (PDD) and pressure during Peak Hour Demand (PHD) in
accordance with DOH requirements. Identify capital improvements needed to bring the
existing system in compliance with DOH regulations for fire flow and PHD pressures.
7. Run simulations of the distribution system (under 20-year projected demand conditions)
to determine available fire flow during PDD and pressure during PHD in accordance with
DOH requirements. Identify capital improvements needed to bring the distribution
system (with 20-year projected demands) in compliance with DOH regulations for fire
flow and PHD pressures.
8. Run simulations of the distribution system (using 6-year demand projections) to
determine the capital improvements needed during the fIrst 6 years to bring the existing
system in compliance with DOH regulations. This analysis will remove items from the
20-year CIP listing to identify the projects that are needed to meet the 6-year
requirements.
9. Develop comprehensive CIP and cost estimate.
10. Create two separate sets of hydraulic model input flIes, one containing all the scenarios
used in the development of the Capital Improvements and one "Working" model with a
limited number of scenarios that can be used by City staff for the on-going evaluation of
the system.
11. Provide on-site training on the development, calibration, and operation of the two model
files.
City Responsibilities
1. Provide base hydraulic model (W ATERCAD) input flIes.
2. Provide data on distribution system facilities (controls, pump curves, storage reservoirs,
diurnal demand curve, interties, large uset demands, etc.) for confirmation that
information in the mod.el is accurate.
3. Perform calibration fire flow tests.
4. Provide staff knowledgeable in the operation ofthe system to discuss issues as they arise
during the modeling process.
5. Provide projected demands by pressure zone.
6. Review and comment on proposed capital improvement project submittals.
Assumptions
1. Model successfully operates in steady-state and Extended Period simulation prior to
delivery to HDR.
2. HDR will not participate in field work for calibration fire flow tests.
3. Current demand in the model is appropriately distributed to junction nodes to reflect the
population distribution. Creation of current peak day demand will only require a
universal multiplication factor to the existing individual junction demands so as to match
current demand.
BremertonlHDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 8 of21
%
0~f
. . d . d I fil /1/
4. One meetmg reqUIre to reVIew mo e es.;.y1 /'
5. Data on future population distribution is available in a manner that will allow future r <"
demand to be allocated to junctions in the model. "
Deliverables
1. Capital Improvement list for piping, pumping, and storage. The list will identify projects
needed to meet existing deficiencies, projects needed within the next 6-years, and
projects needed beyond the 6-year horizon but needed within the 20-year limit.
2. Hydraulic Model (W ATERCAD) data files that includes the scenarios used in the
development of the capital improvement listing.
3. Hydraulic Model (W ATERCAD) data files that reflect the existing system and can be
used by City staff to simulate operation of the existing system. This model can be edited
by staff as new projects are constructed in the system.
4. Provide graphical descriptions of each reservoir identifying DS, SB/FSS, ES, and OS for
each.
TASK 2.O-W A TER CONSERVATION
The State of Washington is in the process of writing a new water conservation rule related to the
passage of House Bill 1338 in 2003 (commonly referred to as the Municipal Water Law). This
rule will essentially replace DOH's 1994 Conservation Planning Requirements and must be
adopted by DOH by the end of2005. The objective of this task will be to determine steps
Bremerton will need to take to comply with the new rule, and the timeline for completing these
steps. Additionally, HDR/EES will review the updated Conservation Plan prepared by the City,
and will evaluate conservation measures by quantifying historic and future conservation savings.
Consultant Services
1. Review the dr~ rule and assess how it affects the City ofBremerton.
2. Prepare a memo detailing the requirements and timeline, as they pertain to the specific
characteristics of the Bremerton water system. If the final rule differs materially in ways
that affect Bremerton, a follow-up memo will be prepared.
3. Review updated Conservation Plan developed by the City and provide written comments.
4. Evaluate the costs and water savings of up to five specific conservation measures.
5. Prepare a spreadsheet to analy~e these five measures, using specific data on customer
demographics and water sales provided by the City.
City Responsibilities
1. Participate in up to two meetings or conference calls to discuss requirements in the draft
rule.
2. Update Conservation Plan and provide to consultant for review and comment.
3. Assist with selection of conservation measures to be evaluated.
4. Provide data on customer demographics and water sales to support this analysis.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 9 of21
0
%
Assumptions ~
1. DOH will complete rule-making by its scheduled deadline of December 31, 2005. ('
2. Standard assumptions on costs and water savings developed by HDR for spreadsheet
analysis of conservation measures will be applied. No new in-depth research on
conservation measures will be required.
Deliverables
1. Technical memorandum summarizing impacts of new Rule on the City.
2. Written comments on draft Conservation chapter prepared by the City.
3. Spreadsheet analyzing up to five conservation m~asures.
TASK 3.O-WATER QUALITY REVIEW AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
The objective of this task is to develop a plan for existing and continued compliance with State
and Federal Safe Drinking Water Act requirements.
Consultant Services
1. Describe Safe Drinking Water Act and Washington State Administrative Code drinking
water regulations applicable to the City for:
a. Existing Regulations
b. Proposed Regulations
c. Anticipated Regulations
2. Prepare a Data Request form to obtain historical water quality data and monitoring plans.
3. Review the City's water quality compliance data from ZOOO-2005, includin~
Cryptosporidium data, if available.
4. Review the City's existing regulatory compliance monitoring plans.
5. Document compliance status.
6. Prepare recommendations regarding existing monitoring plans and/or treatment practices
based on existing or proposed Safe Drinking Water Act regulations.
7. Conduct an evaluation of Stage 2 Disinfection Byproduct Rule Initial Distribution
SY$tem Evaluation (IDSE) compliance strategies.
a. Determine Standard Monitoring Program sampling requirements
b. Compare existing hydraulic model capabilities to roSE compliant model
requirements, to determine feasibility of conducting a System Specific S~udy.
c. Estimate costs associated with making necessary updates to model.
d. Recommend an IDSE compliance approach.
8. Prepare Comprehensive Regulatory Compliance Plan.
9. Review and document the City's procedures for handling customer inquiries
10. Document use of certified laboratories.
BremertonIHDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 10 of21
0 I
~
City Responsibilities ~
1. Provide existing water quality monitoring plans and requested regulatory compliance data (
from 2000-2005 for review.
2. Attend up to two meetings (one to review existing data, one to discuss IDSE compliance
strategies).
3. Review draft chapter and provide comments.
Assumptions
1. The recommendation for IDSE compliance strategy is for planning purposes only. At the
City's request, an additional services scope of services will be prepared for the
development of the IDSE monitoring plan and/or modeling scenarios. This work will be
considered once the Rule is finalized.
2. Impacts ofthe L T2ESWTR on the City will be summarized in this Chapter. A detailed
compliance strategy will be developed under Task 4.
3. Existing monitoring plans will be updated and modified by the City, based on
recommendations prepared by HDR.
4. Up to two meetings will be attended to complete this section of the WSP.
Deliverables
1. E-mailed document files of the draft and final WSP chapter.
2. IDSE compliance strategy Technical Memorandum.
TASK 4.0 - LT2ESWTR COMPLIANCE STRATEGY AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
The City of Bremerton' s Union River water source is classified as unfiltered surface water. On
August 11, 2003, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) issued the proposed Long
Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2) that contains additional treatment
requirements for unfiltered surface waters. The EP A is expected to issue the final L T2 rule in
early 2006. This scope of work describes consulting engineering services for planning, selection,
and preliminary design of advanced disinfection to comply with L T2 requirements.
The proposed L T2 rule requires 2- to 3-log inactivation of Cryptosporidium, in addition to the
microbial treatment requirements already in place. This must be accomplished with a minimum
of two disinfectants. There are three potential disinfectants that could be added: ultraviolet light,
chlorine dioxide, and ozone. Membrane filtration could also be used to meet the regulatory
requirements. This project will assist the City in selecting the preferred treatment process to use
in meeting regulatory requirements for the Union River source.
Once the preferred treatment process is selected, alternative sites will be evaluated to determine
the best location to build the new treatment facility. It is anticipated that only two sites will need
to be fully evaluated to select the best site. Alternative sites will be evaluated on the basis of
hydraulics, available space, existing utility services, ownership and land use issues, other utility
preferences, and costs.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 11 of21
I
%
~
Consultant Services ~
1. Prepare a request for information outlining the information necessary to complete the /"
project. '(
2. Conduct a project kick-off meeting and site visit to McKenna Falls area.
a. Identify potential locations for a new advanced disinfection facility.
b. Assess the condition of the chlorine system.
c. Understand how the system is operated.
d. Review available maps and other information.
e. Assist the City in determining treatment, operations, and water quality objectives to
consider as the L T2 compliance strategy is developed.
f. Prepare meeting notes.
3. Document existing facilities in the McKenna Falls area.
a. Revh~w a description of the existing system, a site map of McKenna Falls area
facilities, system schematic, and hydraulic grade line which will be provided by the
city.
b. Review existing level of disinfection provided with chlorine.
c. Document operational requirements including conjunctive use other sources in the
system.
d. Review the condition ofthe chlorine system referencing EES Tech Memo June 1999.
e. Determine the cost of installing Halogen tank closure valves to meet International
Fire Code requirements for controlling chlorine releases.
f Determine if the chlorine facility should be retained or incorporated into a new
advanced disinfection building with the other disinfectant.
4. Evaluate water quality and regulatory requirements.
a. Provide a general description ofLT2 and its implications for the City (summarized
from Task 3).
b. Review turbidity data to determine expected frequencies and durations that the Union
River source may need to be out of service. Determine a combination of alternative
sources and storage to meet supply needs with the expected downtime at the 6- and
20-year planning horizons.
c. Discuss the stability of the Union River's unfiltered status with WDOH.
d. Assist the City with a plan for additional water quality data collection.
1. Methods and frequencies for additional Crypto monitoring.
ii. Data to support design and regulatory approval for advanced disinfection.
S. Evaluate Treatment Process Options and Select the Preferred Alternative.
a. Develop alternatives to be considered including: UV light, ozone, chlorine dioxide,
and membrane filtration.
b. Describe how the process options would be combined to meet regulatory
requirements.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 12 of21
0
~
c. Assist the City with development of criteria for evaluating the altematives that could ~
include: Life-cycle cost; Operational complexity; Reliability; Water Quality; Water (
System Compatibility.
d. Discuss options for addressing the patent on UV disinfection.
e. Provide cost opinions.
f. Evaluate the options against the selected criteria.
g. City to select preferred treatment option.
6. Evaluate Alternative Sites for the New Treatment Facility.
a. Identify up to three potential locations for future treatment facilities.
1. Perform site visit.
ii. Facility siting locations will consider: Existing system configuration; System
hydraulics; Available land; Site utilities, and future potential need of a filtration
facility.
b. Develop up to five alternative compliance solutions (combinations of treatment
technology and site) for city review and selection.
1. Develop conceptual system configuration.
ii. Determine impact on system hydraulics.
iii. Determine impact on system disinfection strategy (Will chlorine requirements be
reduced or changed? Can a method other than ton containers be used? Will
chlorine boosters in the system be needed?).
iv. Estimate capital, annual operation & maintenance (O&M) cost, and 20-year
lifecycle costs.
c. Investigate and describe legal considerations: Ownership; Land use / zoning; Right of
way; Restrictive covenants; Relationship with the boundary review board and utilities
and transportation commission (UTC).
d. Lead a workshop with City staff to evaluate alternatives and select the preferred
alternative using the Pairwise Comparison process.
e. Prepare technical memorandum.
City Responsibilities
1. ;Provide requested information.
2. Att~nd kick-off meeting and conduct site visits.
3. Review and comment on Technical Memorandum.
4. Help select treatment alternative evaluation criteria.
5. Host and participate in workshop.
6. Attend site visits to other UV disinfection facilities.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 13 of21
I
I
0
%
~
Assumptions ~
1. Surveying and geotechnical investigations are not included in this scope of services.
'\
2. Base maps for existing facilities can be provided by the City.
3. The preliminary design services provided are not intended to result in complete and
finished construction documents.
4. Equipment procurement is not included in this scope of services.
5. Project report to DOH is not included.
Deliverables
1. Kick-off meeting and site vi~it meeting notes.
2. Technical Memorandum and workshop.
TASK 5.0 - CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL
The objective of Task 5.0 is to review the City's current Cross Connection Control Plan (CCCP)
and compare it to the requirements contained in WAC 246-290-490, Cross-Connection Control.
A summary section will be prepared that addresses the minimum elements to be included in the
WSP. Recommendations will be developed for updating the CCCP.
Consultant Services
1. Review the City's existing Cross Connection Control Plan.
2. Meet with City to discuss degree of implementation of each Plan element.
3. Review authority associated with each Plan element.
4. Develop recommendations for strengthening implementation of Plan elements, as needed.
5. Prepare summary section for WSP.
City Responsibilities
1. Provide copy of current CCCP for review.
2. Provide description of City actions used to meet required elements ofCCCP.
3. Describe degree of implementation for each element.
4. Provide copy of most recent CCC report submitted to State.
Assumptions
1. City's existing CCCP contains minimum required elements.
2. Recommendations for improving CCCP will be prepared by IIDR. However, City will
develop and implement recommendations.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
I Page 14 of21
~
~
0
tV
~~ . ~
1. Draft and final Technical Memoranda summarizing recommendations for improving the ''\
City's CCCP.
2. Summary section to be included in WSP.
TASK 6.0 - FINANCIAL PROGRAM
The objective of this task is to develop a financial plan that identifies the adequate funding of
operating and maintenance expenses, taxes/transfers, debt service and capital projects. Special
emphasis will \,>e placed on the development of a capital funding approach that considers both
annual capital renewals/replacements and non-recurring projects. The results of the financial plan
will provide a recommendation regarding the required changes in rate revenue levels to
accomplish both the existing obligations ofthe water utility and new operating and capital items
identified in the WSP. Additionally, this task will result in the development of alternative
conservation rates and a conservation rate structure that meets the City's goals and objectives
while maintaining revenue stability.
Consultant Services
1. Summarize operating income and expenses for the last 6 years (WSP requirement).
2. Update the City's existing model with current year budget (O&M, taxes, debt service).
3. Review financial indicators (reserve levels, renewal and replacement funding levels, debt
service coverage).
4. Incorporate new operating, maintenance and capital items identified in the WSP
5. Develop rate transition plan.
6. Discuss alternl:\.tive conservation rate options (overview).
7. Develop one (1) conservation based rate design alternative that meets the City's goals
and objectives.
City Responsibilities
1. Provide current year budget document (revenue and expenses).
2. Provide six years of historical audited financial statements (2000 - 2005).
3. Review and comment on draft results of financial plan (technical).
4. Review and comment on draft written financial section ofWSP.
5. Sqpply City specific billing data, by customer class.
6. Identification of goals and objectives for conservation rate.
7. Review of alternative conservation rate options.
8. Identification of most appropriate rate option to use for development of City conservation
rate.
Btemerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 15 of21
0
%
Assumpti~ns. . . .. ~
1. EXIstmg financIal plan m rate model can be used to update operatmg, mamtenance and ~
capital costs. No major changes to model required.
2. Historical financial statements are available.
3. The City can generate City-specific billing data, by customer class, to develop
conservation based rate.
Deliverables
1. Six-year financial plan that includes existing and new operating and capital obligations.
2. Annual rate impact to accomplish items identified in the WSP.
3. Rate transition plan.
4. Written financial section ofWSP.
5. Conservation based rate design that meets goals and objectives of City.
TASK 7.0 - REVIEW OF DRAFT WSP
The objective of this task is to provide external review ofWSP chapters prepared by the City,
and to provide external QC review of the draft final WSP prior to submittal to DOH.
Consultant Services
1. Review draft Chapters ofWSP prepared by City.
2. Conduct QC review of draft final WSP prior to submittal to DOH.
3. Provide written comments to City.
City Responsibilities
1. Prepare draft Chapters and submit electronic version to HDR for review.
2. Incorporate selected comments.
3. Prepare final Chapters and draft final WSP for submittal to DOH.
Assumptions
1. Members ofHDR project team with appropriate expertise will be assigned to Chapter
review.
2. HDR project manager will conduGt cover-to-cover QC review of draft final WSP prior to
submittal to DOH by the City.
3. City will provide minimum of2-week review perioq for individual chapters and 3-week
review period for draft final WSP.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 16 of21
~,
~
~'f
/~
Delivetables ~
1. Electronic comments on Chapters.
2. Electronic comments on draft final WSP.
TASK 8.0 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The objective of this Task is to manage the scope, schedule and budget for consultant's portions
of the City's WSP update. Work with City project manager to coordinate joint CitylHDR team
to complete project services.
Consultant Services
1. Organize and manage consultant project team and coordinate with City project manager
to manage joint project team.
2. Prepare and maintain updates to a project guide.
3. Prepare initial project scope, schedule and budget and update as the project is completed.
4. Prepare monthly team meeting agenda, notes, and action items.
5. Prepare brief monthly progress reports including the following:
a. CommunicationslMeetings Summary
b. Work Completed During the Month
c. Work Scheduled Next Month
d. Needs for Additional Information/Reviews
e. Scope/Schedule/Budget Issues/Changes
f. Schedule Update
g. Summary Budget Update
6. Prepare standard HDR format invoice and submit monthly.
7. Attend up to a total of four meetings with parties external to the WSP development team
(i.e., DOH, City Council, public meeting).
City Responsibilities
1. Review monthly reports and requests for information.
2. Participate in monthly team meetings and other meetings between individual team
members as needed to conduct work.
3. Prompt review and processing of monthly invoices.
4. Schedule external meetings and develop agendas, including explanation of consultant
responsibilities.
5. Provide a minimum of one-week advance notice prior to scheduling external meetings.
Assumptions
1. Project duration will be from October 2005 through December 2007.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 17 of21
/'~~.
(/,~
#7'''',,1'
/6~A
2. The IIDR Project Manager will he Melinda Friedman. Should the project manager need ~
to change, her replacement shall be approved by the City ofBremerton.
3. Monthly progress/team coordination meetings will most often occur via telephone.
Meetings in person will be conducted at the City's offices as needed.
Deliverables
1. Three oopies of a project guide - including final scope, schedule, and b\Jdget
2. Project guide updates - as needed
3. Coordination meeting agenda, notes, and action items
4. Monthly project reports
5. Monthly invoices
TASK 9.0 - SuPPLEMENTAL ASSISTANCE
Supplemental Assistance is an optional task. $20,000 ofthe total contract amount is specifically
budgeted to this task. Assistance may be in areas such as additional presentations, meetings, or
development of technical work products not identified in the scope of work. Prior to proceeding
with any work or incurring any expenditure associated with this task, written authorization must
be obtained from the City's project manager.
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 18 of21
I
r
/A~~:)
o. I .,-
/,r;:l
v/
Exhibit B ~
Schedule (
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Notice to Proceed Oct. 2005
First draft of Water System Plan for internal review (Tasks 1,3,5,6, and 7) April 2006
Final draft ofWSP for City and DOH 90-day review (Task 7) July 2006
Final WSP for DOH approval Dec. 1,2006
Stage 2 DIDBPR and IDSE Evaluation (Included in Task 3) Within 6
months after
rule
promulgation
Evaluate Impact ofLT2SWTR (Task 4) Within 12
months after
rule
promulgation
Conservation Plan Evaluation (Task 2) Complete by
mid -2007
Completion of all tasks in this project December 31,
2007
Bremerton/HDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 19 of21
. . //)
,",j.,U
Exhibit C Budget FIFO.
~
I I ~<
I QAIQC I Project Mgr I Senior Engineer I Senior Engineer I Project Engineer I Financial Manager I Financial Analyst I Planner I Project Engineer I Senior Planner I CAD Technician I proJ Controller I Admin Asst I I TOQ' P'ojecl Co,, II " -- ~I!l
HDR Budget Task Totals I O~"' Oi,~, I HOR TOQ' I Q ." ~ iii
Costs (ODes) 0 r= " .
J. Peterson M. Friedman D. Howie B. Black P. Kwan A. Sanchez S. Koom K. O"Rourke A. Hanson A. Graham SQff G.Pfelffer J. Self j; . c E'
~3 ~ .
~ ~ ;t8iii O~ ;'!
I Hours I Hours I I I I II ~"
Tasks r:".."t Hours ~o!<f 1-1011"" (':01\1 Houts Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost I-Inllrs Cost Hour!:. (';0:'\1 Hours Cost J.lt'''''~ Cost Hours C~t Hours Cost Hours Cost Cost
.Tsstr 1 - S~ An&1ySia II $II 2 $354 39 $6,_ II $II II $II II $II II $11 4 $382 126 $12,213 II $II 12 $986 II $11 2 $151 185 $20,_ $1,1184 $22,11'111 $II $22,1170 $1,084 $100 $50 $100 $50 $759 $25
1.1- Receive/Review model 2 $354 8 $775 10 $1,129
1.2 - Field Calibration
Assistance 4 $708 4 $388 2 $164 10 $1,260
1.3 - Edit/Calibrate Model 4 $708 30 $2,908 2 $164 36 $3,780
1.4 - Demand Allocation 1 $177 4 $382 16 $1,551 21 $2,110
1.5 - Source and Storage
Calculations 4 $708 12 $1,163 16 $1,871
1.6 - Existing System
Simulations and CIP 4 $708 16 $1,551 20 $2,259
1.7 - 20-yea, System
Simulations and CIP 4 $708 16 $1,551 20 $2,259
1.8 - B-yea, System Simulations
and CIP 4 $708 8 $775 12 $1,483
1.9 - CIP Listing and Cost Estim 2 $354 4 $708 12 $1,163 8 $657 2 $151 28 $3,033
1.10 - Prepare Model for
Delivery 4 $388 4 $388
1.11 - On-site Training 8 $1,415 8 Sl.415
7'ss(t~. Wamt.~etVat/OfI .2 $422 0 $II I) $II II $II. I) $II II $II II $II 32 $3,lIR I) $II 16 $2,579 0, $II II $II 8 $805 .58 $6.8&3 ~ $7,1~ $0 $7.126 $463 $0 $50 $100 $50 S238 $25
2.1 - Review Draft Rule 5 $806 5 $806
2.2 - Rule Impacts TM 2 $422 2 $191 5 $806 2 $151 11 $1,570
2.3 - Review Draft Conservation
Plan 5 $478 3 $484 8 $961
2.4 - Evaluate Costs/Savings of
Conservation Measures 15 $1,433 3 $484 3 $227 21 $2,143
2.5 - Prepare Measure
Evaluation Spreadsheet 10 ~9~,~ 3 S227 13 Sl.182
task ~..Wamt ~ F/fMf!W.
~~PI/II.~ 8 $1,_ 47 $8,31. 24 $4,24& I) $II 'Il $II . $II I) $0 II $II, ,144 $1t~. '0 $II 0 $II II $II .. $II ...m $~,788 . $1,181 $28,'" $II ~i'" $1,181 $0 $50 $100 $100 $906 $25
3.1 - Describe SDWA
Regulatory Requirements 4 $708 32 $3,102 36 $3,809
3.2 - Prepare Data Request 1 $177 4 $388 5 $565
3.3 - Review Historical Data 4 $708 16 $1,551 20 $2,259
3.4 - Review Monitoring Plans 4 $388 4 $388
3.5 - Document Compliance
Status 2 $354 16 $1,551 18 $1,905
3.6 - Prepare Recommendations 4 $708 4 $388 8 $1,095
3.7 - Conduct IDSE Evaluation 24 $4,246 24 $4,246 32 $3,102 80 $11,595
3.8 - Prepare Comprehensive
Regulatory Compliance Plan 6 $1,265 8 $1,415 32 $3,102 46 $5,782
3.9 - Review ProckJures for
Customer Complaints 2 $194 2 $194
3.10 - Document Laboratory
Certification 2 $194 2 $194
BremertonlBDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 20 of21
. 0-
-
r... 4. L12ESW1R Compl/lmce
["n""..,. ,.l'teIiminatyDeMltl. . $&,4l!O ~ $&,~70 0 $0 1113 $24,40 '171 ,$19,703 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4CI $3,_ 0 $0. 18 $1,_ 480 $80,507 $3.812 . $84,3.,. $0 , $64,379 $3.872 $200 $200 $1,000 $200
4.1 - Prepare RFI 2 $300 2 $300
4.2 - Conduct Kick-off Mtg &
Site Visit to McKenna Falls 3 $632 3 $531 17 $2,551 12 $1,321 35 $5,035
4.3- Document existing facilites
at McKenna Falls 7 $1,475 11 $1,946 41 $6,152 23 $2,532 20 $1,643 4 $302 106 $14,051
4.4 - Eval WIT Quality and
Regulatory Requirements 4 $843 5 $885 18 $2,701 41 $4,513 4 $302 72 $9,244
4.5 - Eval Treatment Process
Options & Select Pref Altem 6 $1,265 8 $1,415 42 $6,302 50 $5,504 4 $302 110 $14,788
4.6 - Eval Altern Sites for new
Treatment Facility 6 $1.265 9 $1.592 43 $6.452 Ii~ $5.834 20 $1.643 4 $301 1~1i S17.088
T*.~';~.~..~, t! $!I .. $1,411. 0, $0 .0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $CI $5,818 0 $0 0 $0 II $!I 3 $W 7'! ~."" $4a& $7,'" $0 $7,'" $426 $0 $50 $50 $25 $291 $10
5.1 - Review Existing CCCP 4 $708 16 $1,551 20 $2,259
5.2 - Review Implementation
Procedures 8 $775 8 $775
5.3 - Review AuthOlity 4 $388 4 $388
5.4 - Develop
Recommendations 4 $708 24 $2,326 3 $227 31 $3,261
5.5 - Prepare Summary Section
for WSP 8 $775 8 $775
f*f~ Fl~,'P/ognrm , lI' $0 1I $0 ,0 $0 0 $0 .0 $0 32 $5.n3 84 $7,1$0 0 $0 .0..,' $0. 0 $!I O. $0 0 $0 A $302 100 $12,725. $&2.11 $13,34& \ $0 $13,m $620 $0 $50 $100 $50 $410 $10
6.1 - Summarize Expenses 2 $330 4 $447 6 $776
6.2 . Update Financial Model 2 $330 6 $670 8 $1,000
6.3 - Review Financial
Indicato's 2 $330 6 $670 8 $1,000
6.4 -Incorporate Items Identified
inWSP 4 $659 12 $1,341 2 $151 18 $2,151
6.5 - Develop Rate Transition
Plan 6 $989 12 $1,341 18 $2,329
6.6 -Identify Alternative
Conservation Rate Options 8 $1,318 12 $1,341 20 $2,659
6.7 - Develop Conservation-
Based Rate DeSign 8 $1.318 12 $1.341 2 $151 22 $2.810
f*7~~of~WSI:'., 8 $1,6!J& 4CI $7,077 8 $1,411 1I $0 0 $Il 0. $I! II $0 II $0 0 .$Il, " $1,2llO 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0, .f;4 l1;1_. $477 511,ll4!l $!I 511,141 $477 $0 $50 $50 $100 $262 $15
7.1 - Review Chapters 8 $1,415 8 $1,415 8 $1,290 24 $4,121
7.2- QC Review of Draft Final
WSP 8 $1,686 16 $2,831 24 $4,517
7.3 - Provide Written Comments 16 $2.831 16 $2.831
ii
T.8.~"",'\..,." . '!f. ..0 $I! 1.30 . 5~,oo~ 0 $!I 0 $0 0 .$0 0 $0 0 $II II $0 II $0 0 $0 0 $0 44 $4,193 8 $8OIi 1~ .$27,,,,, $1~, ~,m, ,$0 $2ll,~., $1,296 $0 $50 $200 $200 $746 $100
8.1 - Manage project Team 18 $3,185 18 $3,185
8.2 - Prepare Project Guide 4 $708 8 $762 8 $605 20 $2,075
8.3 - Prepare Scope, Budge~
Schedule
8.4 - Conduct Monthly Status
Meetings 24 $4,246 24 $4,246
8.5 - Prepare Monthly P'ogress
Reports 18 $3,185 12 $1,143 30 $4,328
8.6 - Prepare Monthly Invoices 18 $3,185 24 $2,287 42 $5,472
8.7 . Attend External Meetings 48 $8.493 48 $8,493
T...i,'~A"",,,;,".,j,", 10. $0. to $0 ]'0 $II. 1'0 '$II; Io $Il 0 $0 $0 f .0 $0 I 0, $0 $0 $!I $0 1.0 $!I I II $0 l ...;$!I... l$2.ll,ooGf $II l $2.II.llOO .. ,l $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0
, I , I I 1 1 I j , , , I , , I , , ,
Project Totals 1421 $8,853 12631 $46,534 171 I $12,562 /1631 $24,459 11791 $19,703 136 $4.193 141 I $3.098 11341 I $175,390 I $9,419 I $204,8091 $0 I $204.809
I
$8,853 $46,534 $12,562 $24,459 $19,703 $5,273 $7,150 $3,439 $31,986 $3,869 $4,271 $4,193 $3,098 1341 $175,390 $9,419 $204,809 $0 $204,809
Bremertonl}IDR
Water System Plan and Regulatory Technical Evaluation
Page 21 of21