The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/20/84]TXPE #150 ~0000 CITY CCUNCIL lvlklhT/l',K] IvtlN(71F_,~ June 20, 1984 JlLAPPi~3V~D DPAFT The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton, Washington, was held in the City Council Chambers, 239 Fourth Street, Bremerton, Washing- ton, Wednesday, June 20, 1984, at 5:30 p.m. with Council President Art Ander- son presiding. Also present were Councilmen E.L.Sturdivant, Bill Am, Jim Adrian, Phil Drouin, Spencer Homing, Russ Johnson, R~y Mosely and Clyde Pachek; City Attorney Bill Broughton, Mayor Morrie Dawkins and City Clerk Kathleen McCluskey. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Alleginance and the invocation was given by Council E. L. Sturdivant. President Anderson noted items #10-C and ~10-E have bee pulled frcrn New Business. CONSENT AGENDA - BID A~qARD RECCMMENI]ATION/5 USED SEDANS #AB84-314 Mr. Dave Patmon gave a presentation on 'the ~o bidders, Bennett Ford (local) and Hertz Corporation - used sedans per specifications. Both proposed cars with 25,000 miles average use and staff reccrrnended acceptance of cars. Using ccr~parative analysis, over the expected seven-year use, the Dodge Aries (Hertz bid) will cost the City $3,095 less than the Mercury model bid by Bennett Ford. If the Council had concerns they my wish to award to a local vendor, however, the recomendation of the staff was to accept the bid received by Hertz in the amount of $32,995.00, plus applicable tax. Councilman Drouin asked if it were legal to award a bid in t/tis manner. Mr. Patron stated that specifications take into consideration more than cost facto~ for example warranty, service, travel time or available parts. When questioned about the average age of vehicles in the fleet Mr. Patnon said over 50% were 5.5 years old on average. He further stated that useful life of a ccr~pany vehi. cle is 75,000 miles. He deferred statistical questions to Della Mydske who stated the information w-as not a~kailable at this time but she could prepare it if Council needed it. Councilman Mosely asked which was the best deal, the 1982 or 1983 model cars? Mr. Patmen said that vehicles demonstrated were looked over carefully before reccrmmdation was made and that the Hertz cars had less visual exterior wear. He said Bennett Ford would have opportunity to present others than examined. Councilman Sturdivant asked the difference in warranty with Mr. Patmon respond- ing that Bennett Ford could provide local service, hcTwever, Hertz would allow the City to repair in it's own garage. Councilman Mosely asked if they were used or traded vehicles. Mr. Patmon stated cars were used in the rental fleet service of both bidders. #0541 Mr. Richard Gregg Bennett Ford representati~, offered to extend the city rights to cosmetic repairs before city takes delivery. A Ford Motor Warranty was offered on all cars and when vehicle was in for repairs the City would have the use of a rental car while in shop as part of the program he was offering. M/S/C/(Sturdivant/Drouin) to approve bid award to Bennett Ford. CounciLman Adrian abstained. Motion passed. Ms. McCluskey stated that since the Councilman have not had opportunity to review their copies of the mutes of June 13, 1984, they will be under next weeks business. CLA/~4S FOR DAMAGES #AB84-315 City Clerk McCluskey read for the record claims for damages received from, Steve Brewn, Dennis E. Perkins, Sandra Galando, Rcmain A. Miller, Charles L. Stone, Puget Sound Pc~er and Light and West American Insurance ccmpany. CLA_LMS/~ REGISTER #AB84-316 Gross Payroll in the amount of $317,872.30; Gross Payroll Retirees, $43,764.90; Employment Security, $13,070.28; Special Warrants #3335 - 3343 in the amount of $124,435.37, and Regular Warrants, #3349-3719 in the aunount of $265,990.33, were audited and certifiedby Darlene Herrmann as required by NeW 42.24.090 and recorded on listings made available to Council. CiCy Co~cil Reg. Mtg..Minutes jkme 20, 1984 Pg. 2 of 7 UNAPPPIDVED DRZ'47~p #0637 #0655 ~1043 #1474 #1778 M/S/C/U/(Mosely/Pachek) to approve Claims and Warrants as presented. Clerk McCluskey presented Construction Warrants for the Wastewater Faci~- ties Construction Project in the amount of $2,052,706.02 for Council appro- val. M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Mosely) to approve Construction Warrants for WWFEP. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Glenn Vockrodt, 1409 Marlow Drive, addressed the Council on two issues. (1) He felt Shoreline violations were occurring on old Wheaton Way across frcm Fast Park. He stated a fill was established without a permit, and requests that it be removed. He noted the material has bee there two months. Council responded that they understood that the Building department has already redm tagged the prclDerty in question. (2) Mr. Vockrodt said that at the North end of Park Avenue near the two houses and South of the Pump Station, materials were left after repairs to a sewer break. The materials are still there and felt they should be remDve~]. Councilman Anderson directed the Mayor to check into both requests and report back. Clerk McCluskey advised the F~3/lowe property is city property. Council President advised that we would have a report at next meeting. Ms. Walterine Taylor, 2708 Callaban Drive, inquired about the investigation within the Police depet and Council President stated a report tk~s been received by the Council and Administration. MAYOR'S REPORTS - CONFIRMATION OF BUILDING OFFICIAL #AB84-326 On Ju~e 11, 1984, a ccmmittee interviewed applicants for Building Official and Mr. David Delph was selected the most suitable and qualified candidate. Mayor Dawkins stated he is currently with the County as Building Official and asked that Council confirm his appointment. M/S/C/U/(Homing/AnD) to approve the appointment of Mr. David Delph as the new Building Official. Councilman Adrian pointed out Mr. Chet Megis, Acting Fire Chief, had assumed the responsibilities for the past six months and he should be ccx~rended. CENSUS IMPACT DEFINITION Mr. Joe Gero indicated that the city of Bremerton was denied its request for an adjustment to the Census figures, as of April 1, 1984, and what is needed is for the City to request reconsideration, to the State by June 22, 1984, which is the deadline. If the State does not concur, we will have to file an action in Superior Court. M/S/C/U/(Mosely/Adrian) by the Bremerton City Council that the Mayor is hereby directed to pursue through appropriate methods an appeal of the State of Wash- ington - 1984 estimate of Bremerton Census count. The Mayor should consider appropriate stepped prccedures to seek a solution agreeable to the City posi- tion which includes the possibility of filing in an appropriate court. CITY ATTORNEY ' S REPORT City Attorney Broughton gave background information on the tentative settlememt regarding Police Captain Greg Brouwn, stating the City' s Disability Board denied his request for disability leave or retirement. Mr. Brown appealed the decision through the State 's system and they overturned the denial, referring it back to the City. The City filed an appeal of the decision by the State however, Mr. Brown proposed a resolution of the City' s appeal by waiving his rights to the balance of disability leave on the books in the amount of approximately 124 days. He further stated he negotiated the settlement with Mr. Brcwn and his legal Counsel which was unanimously approved by the Police Pension Board at their regular montj~ly meeting Tuesday, June 19, 1984. It was his reccmmendation to the Council that the City accept the offer to waive balance of disability leave because he feels that we would eventually be unsuccessful in court. Discussion followed regarding needed changes in the State law but City Attorney Broughton stated the way the law stands, cause of the disability is not a factor in awarding a disability. M/S/C/(Pachek/Drouin) to accept offer of settlement that Mr. Brown waives the balance of disability leave on the books. VOTE: In favor; (Homing, Pachek, bbsely, Anderson, Drouin, & Johnson) Against; "'one) Abstained; zt~divant, Amo, & Adrian) #1804 #1939 ~2175 #2588 #2956 City Council Reg. June 20, 1984 Pg. 3 of 7 · Minutes U~APPROVEID DRAFT CCUNCIL REPOt{rS Councilman DroLLin r.eTinded concerned individuals that the Wastewater Ccrmittee meeting is tcr~rrcw at 9:30 a.m. in Council Conference rocm and it is impera- tive those involved attend. Councilman Johnson did not have a report but expressed continued concern with State Ferry service to the Brererton area end thequality provided citing this week's breakdown and hours without service. He suggested that citizens write or phone their representatives in Ol!mpia ccmplaining of their dissatisfaction. ORDINANCES/RESOLL~IONS - "DOMxrlIDWN REDE~YIDPMENT" LID #AB84-327 As directed by the City Council, City Attorney drafted an Ordinance for first reading on the "Downt~{n RedeveloFment" LID. City Clerk indicated copies have been available to interested parties and she has additional copies available on the front desk. Mr. Lou Soriano questioned that the Ordinance, before passed, should indicate interest rates, amount to be assessed property owners, length of time to pay and whether the rate of payment is fixed or variable. He felt there should be an Ordinance drafted that defines these issues before passing the Ordinance on the agenda at this meeting. Mr. Jim Straight, Harlcw Drive (President of BACCN) felt the Councilwas "puttin0 the cart before the horse". He expressed concern about the $7,000,000 for just a cover and parking. He stated without revenue what would the taxes to the citizens be for the city's share. He thought that without the provision for parking first, forget the rest of the project. Mr. Bert Gegner, 934 Washington, said there is a certain amount of gamble to the project and feels that money generated frc~n the property owners may not be enou/ but the city should go for it even though details are not ironed out at this point. Mr. Glenn Vockrodt felt the parking problem should come first and expressed con- cerns of citizen ccnments he has heard. Mr. Gene Fisher, 218 1st Street, said the city should resolve the parking hass]l1 first. He agreed with Mr. Bob Smock (reference Hearing minutes 5/31/84) that we are not prepared to proceed with the project and the boundaries ere still in question and should be more seriously considered, what the cost will be to the taxpayers. Councilman Adrian asked the City Attorney hc~ many more ordinance will be needed with City Attorney Broughton responding, several. One for bonds, assessment roles, selling of bonds, etc. Mr. Adrian asked what exactly this Ordinance covers with City Attorney Broughton stating the project goals, defining boundaries and a chance for people to respond. Mr. Adrian then asked what if the interest rates are high? Mr. Broughton said the state of the bond market is important because the City will have the same concerns as the property owners. Mr. Joe Gero answered questions and ccnr~_nts on parking and said one of the tb/ngs that could be implemented and that the Parking co~xmittee is looking into, is parallel type parking and staff is looking into other solutions. The ccrmittee and staff are progressing and review of maps indicates high percentage of long-term parking at present time in downtown Bremerton. He hopes to bring a rec~rmendation before the Council soon to implement changes. Councilman Pachek noted that free parking will be sereday a thing of the past. He has sedan large shopping cc~plexes like the Value Giant and K-Mart chains starting to charge and put up ~eters. M/S/C/(Adrian/Pachek) to approve an Ordinance, on first reading, ordering the construction of local improvements in the City' s Central Business District all in accordance with Resolution No. 2010 of the City Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 325 and ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvu-. ment; providing that payment for the improv~{~ent be made in part by special assess- ments upon the property in the District, payable by the mode of "payment by bonds"; and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing and local improvement district bonds. Councilman Drouin indicated he would vote in favor as the downtown needed sizzle. Councilman Sturdi~-ant stated his position has not changed and is opposed because he feels ot~ priorities are out of line. Councilman Mosely is still against it ~0779 #0803 City C~,tmci] Reg. Mtg. Minutes UBLAPPROVED DFjIFi' J,.me 2(1, 1984 Pg. a of 7 because his observation of similar type structures shcws, not the positive aspects as indicated by those in favor of this Ordinance. VOTE: In favor; (Amo, Adrian, Anderson, Homing, Pachek, Drouin & Johnsop) Against; (Sturdiv~nt & Mosely) Motion passed RESOLUTION 02036 PERMIT PARKING ZONE 051 - REQUEST TO RESCIND ~AB84-318 The Resolution for Zone #51 was passed by City Council on May 9, 1984, however the residents of the area have now petitioned (100% of original petitioners) to rescind the parking zone. Ms. McCluskey said that of the 3 original petitioners, all 3 signed the request to rescind. The Council would have to repeal by resolu- tion, if that is the desire, per attached Resolution 02036. ~VS/C/(Adrian/Horning) to approve Resolution 02036, rescinding Zone #51, Permit Parking. (Sturdivant not present to vote). Motion passed HEARINGS - OLYMPIC KIDNEY CE~I'ER REQUEST FOR REZONE FROM R-2 to B-2 0AB84-257 Olympic Kidney Center has requested the City to approve a rezone frcm R-2 to B-2 for properties at Clare & Hemlock. Council Presidnet Anderson asked if any Councilman had a conf]_ict of interest; Councilman Sturdivant removed himself frcfa ~e meeting. Carol Saari, Planner, gave a short narrative of the history of action on above request, indicating that the Planning Ccn~nission approved the request per Resolu- tion #716, on April 17, 1984; it was scheduled for City Council Hearing on May 16, 1984 with request for continuance; May 23, 1984 with request for continuance ~d June 6, 1984, with a request for continuance, all granted. She further pre- sented doc~n~tation from the Planning department which was the basis of the Planning Ccr~nission motion to rec~r~nd approval. The proposed fezone would be consistant with adjacent businesses in area, consistent with the Bremerton Area Pi~ policies, would provide more intense use of the subject prope_rty, existing utilities are capable of supporting service, Clare and Hemlockwould more than likely accc~n~Ddate any additional traffic and that the Planning staff had no objections to the proposed fezone to B-2. Mr. Bill Palm~r, Land Use Consultant, worked with Mr. Eline and had asked again per letter dated, June 18, 1984, to delay; hcwever, they have since decided to go ahead with the hearing tonight and have asked the City Council to disregard the previous request to delay tonight. Mr. Palmer wanted to emphasize two areas: (1) ~at both the Planning Departne_nt and Planning Cc~ssion have reviewed the proposed rezone and rec~nend approval; and (2) that the area has substantial comnercial development already in the area. Mr. Eline requests to rezone the whole parcel now instead of ccming back to rezone the balance of the property at later date(s). Mr. Eline requests that the whole parcel be rezoned to B-2 instead of [3-1 because the B-2 zone allows a wider variety of land uses. The B-3 land uses, for example, would allow business and professional offices on the southern portion of the site (such uses would not be allowed in the B-1 zone). Mr. Palmer stated that such land uses would be cc~patible with the surrounding land uses and zoning. His client, Mr. Eline, is also looking for conpatible uses to cc~plement the Kidney Center. }~. Rick Bearbauer, P.O. Box 2058 Silverdale, stated it has been difficult to find a parcel of property to fit the Kidney Center needs at an affordable price and this land is cc~patibte for its purpose. Dr. James Kilduff, Urol0gist - 2500 Cherry Avenue, said the Kidney Center receives public funding and is presently a part of the Northwest Kidney Center. The origi- nal plans were to treat 12 individuals hcwever, they are presently handling in excess of 40 patients with no space, possibility of having to change to shift appointments and no where for patient's family or friends to sit while waiting for patient. He e~phasized the need to be close to the hospital and there is now a need to turn patients away, directing them to seek treatment in Seattle or Taccma. He said he and other investors will lose their earnest money if they do not receive the rezone as that is the way the contract reads. Counci~mAno, for clarification, asked if ~e Kidney Center would lose existing money? Dr. Kilduff stated yes. He mentioned that since BACC~ had accepted the plan, they did not see any problem. Dr. Kenneth Cogan, 2528 hTheaton Way, stated the present facilities are bursting at the seams and the only way to expand would be to start a swingshift, 12:00 to 8:00 a.m., which is not agreeable due to additional staffing and security reasons. He felt the B-2 zoning is appropriate for area and the Kidney Center's needs. He noted that not one neigbtDor or citizen has opposed the plan or complained. Mr. Jim Fortune, 702 Concord Lane, is a patient at the existing facility and the first 1~ years he has checked in for treatment, it wasn't bad. But the needs, #1254 ~2044 ~2080 City Council R~. Mtg. t~inutes U%U~PPROVED J,lue 20, 1984 Page 5 Of 7 because of more patients needing to be served, plus the fact that it serves a 3 county are, the facility is overrun. He urged the City Council to suEport the rezone. Ms. Mickey Kenyon, Employee at Kidney Center, stated that over 25% of the patients being treated are over age 65 years and approximately 14% are in the handicapped category. She urged the Council to pass the rezone'because of the need for ex- pansion of the existing facility to serve Kidney patient needs. Mr. Ivan Trumbell, Vice-President BACON - Cherry P1., approved the initial con- cept of the fezone for the Kidney Center only. Mr. Bill Palmer said to delay action would pose a hardship on the Kidney Center and patients served. Councilman Amo inquired as to the square footage proposed for the facility. P4r. Palmet stated 5,000 feet. Mr. Amo asked if B-1 would not be good enough? Mr. Palmer said for the Kidney Center, yes, however his client will not all the Kidney Center to buy a portion of his property unless the entire property had the B-2 zone. Mr. Amo stated he felt the Kidney Center was important but that the Council was "being held hostage" if they do not grant the rezone and that he would vote against it. CounciLman Mosely thought that no one would build a residence in the area be- cause of the conmercial properties already established but he was concerned about the environmental impact such as signs, noise, etc. that could eventually cause the resthc~e a problem, across the street. He felt it was an ideal place for the Kidney Ces~ter and something needed. Councilman Pachek concurred with ~Lr. Mosely and felt it would be an asset for cc~munity and would support it. Councilman Homing will support the Center and would encourage further use of the property. Councilman Adrian shared some of Mr. AmD's concerns. Maybe the Council should consider, lighting, greenbelt, etc. Concerned about resthame and bordering chLu, in area but would support with restrictions suggested. Councilman Johnson asked who made-the application? Mr. Bearbower, Agent for Olympic Kidney Center, stated that p~wer-of-attorney was granted frcrn the owner Mr. Eline, allowing Dr. Cogan and Mr. Bearbower to act on his behalf. City Attorney reviewed docunents and stated they were in order. Councilman Drouin asked what would prevent a sheetmetal shop or garage type of business going in at a later date. Mr. Gero responded that there would be no way to guarantee. Councilman Anderson wished property was not on terms but wanted the Kidney Center and would vote for project. He further stated he disliked the loss of control over the rest of the property. M/(Amo) to reject rezone frown R-2 to B-2; Motion died for lack of second. Councilman Adrian again expressed his environmental concerns such as visual impact, lighting, noise, glare, traffic impact and City Attorney Broughton stated if he is concerned about these issues, it must be part of the motion. M/S/C/(Adrian/Drouin) to approve rezone frown R-2 to B-2 with a 20' (twenty-foot) greenbelt on the North and West sides and tied to binding site plan approval for environmental concems of visual impact, noise, light, glare, drainage and traffic cc~gest/on. M/A/S/C/(Horning/Pachek) to amend the above motion to include setback of 10' (ten-feet) to the North and West of a solid hedge-like greenbelt. VOTE: In favor; (Adrian, Anderson, Homing, Pachek, Drouin, Johnson & Mosely) Ageins t; (none) Abstained; (Amo) Not Present; (Sturdivant) Amended notion passed VOTE: In favor; (Adrian, Anderson, Homing, Pachek, DroLLin, Johnson & Mosely) Against; (AnD) Not Present; (Sturdiwant) Original motion as amended -passed ORDINANCE (1ST RFADING) AM~qDING ORDINANCE #3622, Sec. 3, #AB84-317 AMBUIANCE APPLICATION UPDATES Ms. McCluskey read the ourending Ordinance #3622, Sec. 3, which adds item #6 referring to updating of an ambulance application when there is a change in any of the informational items listed in sections 1 through 5, ~4C 5.50.303. City Attorney Broughton stated that the Ambulance ccnmittee is suppose to City Council Peg. Mtg. N[inutes June 20, 1984 Pg. 6 of 7 b~LAPPROVED DPJ~7 ~2444 #3015 · TAPE #152 #0137 ~0305 · annually inspect ambulances operating in the city of Br~nerton. What has happened in the past, if that after inspections scrae equipr~dqt has been removed from service with something inferior replacing the equipment inspected. This Ordinance would require ccrpanies operating in the city to update their applica- tions when a piece of equipment is changed. M/S/Cfij/(Adria~/Drouin) to approve Ordinance on Application updates for ambulances on first reading, an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 3622, Section 3. RFSOLUTION ~2038 SUPPOR[FINGCOOPERATIVE SLUDGE MANAGt~ENTALTERNATIVES #AB84-319 Waste~ater Facilities Construction Project Engineer, Dave Baker, gave a short presentation with graphs and d~mrts sho~ing the need to work within the County for a cooperative sludge management alternative. He stated there are four ways to dispose of sludge; (1) land application, (2) landfill - avs/lability, (3) ccm- position and (4) incineration, the most expensive method. He stated ccnposting is long term and has to be stored, used, or sold. Landfill has to be covered. lncineration has air pollution problens and doubtedwe could qualify for the permits. He felt the only solution would be a county-wide cooperative effort. Dr. Don Proctor, Wastewater Treatment Supt. stated that a regional approach would put us on the top of the grants 1/st. If we attenpted to inplement a solution alone, we probably wouldn't receive a dime. M/S/CfiJ/(Pachek/Mosely) to approve Resolution #2038 supporting Cooperative Sludge Management alternatives. NEW BUSINESS - ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT CONTRACT/KCFD #9 NORTH PERRY ~AB84-320 Batt. alion Chief of Training, Gary Scott, stated that if the contract with North Perry is approved, Fire Department staff reccr~rendedmoving R-1 (presently at headquarters station downtcwn) to Station #3, E. 31st and Olympus. He said North Perry has approximately 160-180 calls annually and noted this contract would assess North Perry approximately $15,000 annually which is adequate, comparing other like contracts. Councilman ;ruderson expressed concern about moving R-t to the eastside station for the purpose of obtaining an outside contract. That the service is for the citizens of the city. PEr. Scott stated that headquarters would still have a paramedic attached to an engine ccmpany responding frcm headquarters. He said it would improve manning for the department. Mr. Bert Gegner takes exception with Mr. Scott's conrnent saying that the down- town area is more the elderly and needs the main Rescue Unit in the dense area. Mr. St~rdivant disagreed saying that over 40% of Bremerton's population is in East Bramerton. It was noted that contract is frcxn year to year with a cost of living index. It also is bearing on the number of calls Bremerton Fire responds to. M/S/C/U (Mosety/Aslrian) to approve the Advanced Life support contract with Kitsap County Fire District ~9. CCNTRAC7 AGRFfMflVr BETWEEN CITY OF ~ AND THE CITY OF WINSLOW TO SUPPLY JAIL HOUSING FOR WINSLOW PRISONERS #AB84-321 Act/ng Captain Joe Hatfield gave a short narrative of service to be provided to the City of Winslow for housing certain jail prisoners wkich is similar to contracts already in existance with the Cities of Port Orchard and Poulsbo. Should the Council agree to enter into this contract with the city of Winslow, there is an attached contract, already signed by the Mayor, City Clerk and their City Attorney. He reccrmended the Council approve. He stated that the city of Bremerton has already received in e~xcess of $14,000 to date for the services rendered the cities of Port Orchard and Poulsbo and would receive addi- tional revenues if we include city of Winslcw. Cotmcilman Sturdivant asked if we had housed their prisoners before? Acting Captain Hatfield said, not to his knowledge. M/S/C/U/(~bsely/Adrian) to enter into a Contract with the city of Winslow to house prisoners. Cit7 Cotmcil Req. Mtg. Nttnutes June 20, 1984 Pg. 7 of 7 UNAPPROVED DRAFT ~0356 ~0442 CHANGE ORDER kT~STEWATER FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION PROJECT #2 TO CONTRACT C-6 AB84-323 Dave Baker, Project Engineer, stated the need for the change order because houses were inadvertently left without sewer service unless this work is ccnpleted. · M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Amo) to approve the above request for change order #2 to Contract C-6. BREMERTON HOUSING REHAB PRDGRAM GUIDELINES 1984 REVISED #AB84-325 Ms. Colleen Donley, Planning Department, gave a presentation of 1984 Revised Housing Rehab Program guidelines. This infonnation was obtained over the past 6 months cencerning Br~nerton's Housing rehabilitation needs and requirements of the 3rd Pound of of the Rental Demonstration Program and new Rental Rehab Prcgram. She defined loan categories as (1) 0%, deferred term loans for homeowners with incomes less than or equal tO 65% of the media income; (2) 4%, 30-year term loans for homec~ners with inc~nes greater than 65% but less than or eq~ual to 80% of the m~{lian inccme, loan not to exceed $12,000; and, (3) 0%, deferred term loans for rental properties housing primarily low and moderate in~ persons, with the owner providing bank funds or funds from other private sector sources equal to at least 50% of the total rehabilitation loan package. Cc~parisons are for inc~ne averages in Kitsap County. The progranuq first priority re~a/ns Health and Safety deficiencies. The two target areas are the Naval and Smith neighborhoods. She reccmmended Council approval. Mr. Bert Gegner, Apartment owner, stated he has applied and utilized this pro- gram and it was a "sFecial kind of hassle" to get the loan. He did not like the idea that conditions were placed on the loan such as certified laborers when he could do the work himself at less cost. He reccmmended simplifying contract requirements and clarifying reasonable and just costs. Much of tj]e work he did ffimself, he could not charge against the loan. Ms. Donley stated that contractors have to be State licensed and bonded. · M/S/C/U/(Drouin/An~) to approve the 1984 Revised Housing Rehab Program Guide- lines. LINDSEY REZONE M/S/C/(Adrian/Homing) to cancel request for further hearings on the Iindsey Rezone and have the Shoreline permit issued on condition of fulfilling other conditions required by law. Vote: In favor; (Adrian, Anderson, Drouin, Homing, Pachek, Sturdivant end Johnson ) Against; (None) Abstained; (Amo & Mosely) Motion passed APPROVED: City Council KATI-rr.E'FN ~%~LUSKEY, City Clerk City of Brenerton