HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/12/84 TAPE #201 UNAPPROVED DRAFF
i~ ~0000
CITY COUNCIL Mh:h:['ING MINUTES
December 12, 1984
Re reg~la~ meeting of the City Co~¢it of the City of Bremerton, was
held in the Cotmcil Cham~ers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Was~ktngton, Wed-
nesday December 12, 1984, at 5--30 p.m. with Co~e±l Bresiding ~t ~r~ler-
son presiding. Present ~e~e E. St~i~t~ S~ ~o~g, 9~1 D~o~
Cl~e 9ache~ ~uss Jo~on, ~ ~i~ ~ Bill ~. Also p~e~e~t were
~o~ ~ie Dawkins, 0it~ Atto~e~ Bill B~o~gh~n a~d CitX Clerk ~a~l~
~e m~ti~g was o~ wi~ ~e ~l~ge o~ All~i~m~ led b~ Vioe-B~eside~t
CO~S~ AG~A
Cit~ ~le~ ~l~s~e~ ~ot~ ~at ~e~ ~ Oo~t Age~da, ~t~ ~e~e ~e~t-
~ ~ ~ heard sedately
Cle~ ~es~d ~e ~tes o~ ~o~ 5~ 1984~ m~t~g ~o~ a~o~aZ.
~8~-59~.
Cle~ ~e~ted a ~est
~o~eot. It ~as noted ~t ~e Cit~ di~ ~e~it ~om ~s ag~t ho~e~
~e Cit~ ~s ~o legal
~1~ o~ ~e B~to~ ~e~eZo~t ~a~ Bocce. O~ ~e o~igi~Z ~10~000
willing to aooe~t ~1~000.00 as ~a~t
Co~cil B~esi~ent a~e~ Cit~ Atto~e~ i~ ~e C~t~ ~s ~ 1~al obligatio~ to
pa~ w~t5 ~. B~o~gh~n
oDposed ~a~t ~o~ ~ obligation not ~n~aot~ b~ ~e Cit~. ¢it~ ~l~g
D~eoto~ suggested ~t
ti~ in e~o~ts
~ D~o~ was oo~ce~ed~
~om. ~o~oi~ St~t ~eZt ~o~oil ~ld not ~ti~ ~a~t ~en ~e
Cit~ has aZ~ea~ ~aid a~ox~tel~ ~1~5~000 into d~t~ ~e~e~elo~e~t.
Co~oi~ Jo~so~ s~ggest~ ~l~ng ~til we ~d o~t legal obliga~o~.
~0387 · M/S/(~ach~) to deny r~est for pa~t, ~ ~e ~t of $1,000.00 to
Par~trix, by ~e ~t~ ~develo~t Task Force.
V~: In favor; St~t, Pac~k, ~derson, & ~ (4)
~s~; Hor~g, ~i~, Drown & Jonson (4)
~ Motion FAI[.~ for lack of ~jority.
~0417 ~ M/S/C/(A~i~/Jo~son) to ~le r~st for ~nt by ~e Task For~, for
t~ we~s wi~ f~er legal revi~.
V~: In favor; St~di~t, ~derson, Ho~g, ~i~, Drou~ & Jonson (6)
~; Pachek (1)
~s~; ~ (1)
Motion P~S~.
~u ~ng, 2433 E. Ph~ey ~y Drive (Dist. ~6), was o~osed to furze
consideration of ~t.
Ms. M~luskey presented C~ge ~der No. 5 to Contract C-6, ~84-594, w~ch
is at~uted to an error in desi~ ~d ~ ne~ to relocate ~e pi~l~e
~d consul~t ~s given ~e City a credit (let~r on file in ~e Clerk's
office) ~ offset ~e cost of ~is C~ge ~der. ~e ~t will ~ incr~sed
by $28,130.00. ~. M~luskey pres~ted a second ~ge order, No. 9 to Con-
tract C-3, ~84-595, ~i~ ~cludes 16 it~ on Contract C-3 into one ch~ge
order.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes UNAPPROVED DRAFT
December 12, 19~
Page 2 of 7
Mr. Ken MacKenzie, Project Engineer gave a brief background on the two
Change Orders and indicated the contractor, CH2M Hill has accepted respon-
sibility for the error in Change Order No. 5, Contract C-6, and a credit
will appear on this months bill. Mr. MacKenzie outlined the various
items to be covered under the second change order presented frcm painting
interior of Pump station #7 to temporary pumping, if required.
Mr. Bert Gegner, 934 Washington, was concerned that all change orders
previously presentedwere approved with little question. He felt that it
only encourages the project engineers to make improv~nents without going
over the percentage allow by the contingency fund.
Ms. Mary Lou Long, asked for a clarification of the percentage factor and
would it mean sewer rate increases next year. Council President Anderson
stated that the percentage was determined by the over-all contract figure,
and that the Change orders are paid out of the contingency account which
now is only 3.7% of the total contract which is very low as c~mpared to
other cities in the area of 10%.
#0831 · M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Pachek) to approve Change Order No. 5 to Contract C-6 and
Change Order No. 9 to Contract C-3.
Council President Anderson stated that item "E", #AB84-588, hasbeenpulled.
Council President Anderson and Councilman Adrian left the meeting due to a
conflict of interest.
ed
Ms. McCluskey present/item "F" which is a request frcm the Planning department
to amend the Contract with Phoenix Group for preparation of Application for
Rental Rehabilitation Program Funds. She stated that Phoenix Group is already
under contract to develop the City's application for funding of the Rental
Rehabilitation Program and the agency is the Washington State Department of
Cc~unity Development. DCD has withdrawn the original application due date
and that the contract amendment is designed to accept delivery of the Grant
application and make payment in accordance with the DCD schedule.
Mr. Don Pratt, Co~nunity Block Grant Coordinator, explained that payment would
be frcm Block Grant Funds and he further explained loans and the history of
the program being administered by the Phoenix Group. Councilman Homing asked
if the City was asking Phoenix Group to ccntinue withMr. Pratt stating yes.
Mr. Pratt also confirmed that the City Attorney ~s signed off the request.
#1106 · M/S/C/U/(Horning/Sturdivant) to approve the amending of ~ Contract with
Phoenix Group for the purpose of preparation of application for Rental
Rehabilitation Program Funds.
Councilman Anderson and Adrian returned to the meeting.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Mr. Bert Gegner inquired as to whether the water/sewer rates will be increased
next year with Mayor Dawkins responding that hopefully not however will not
know until the budget is finalized.
Ms. MaryLouLong was concerned about the Contract the City has with PSGand
a requested increase for 1985 in the amount of $350,000 for servicing the
sewer plant. In response Councilman Drouin encouraged public to attend the
Wastewater Facilities Construction project meetings which are held for the
purpose of informing citizens and the City of progress, costs, etc.
Captain Samford, U.S.N., spoke in support of theYMC_AAgreement which is on
the agenda and stressed the importance, not only fort he cc~Nnunity, but the
military personnel and families. He felt it was a viable facility, especially
for the youth.
CLAIMS~ REGISTER, AB84-597
Ms. McCluskey read regular warrants, #7782 - 7783, in the amount of $11,446.25,
audited and certified by Darlene Herrmann as required by RCW 42.24.090, and
recorded on listings made available to the City Council.
#1414 · M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Adrian) to approve the Warrants register as presented.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Dawkins reported that the Planning department, along with the Traffic
City Council Reg. Mtg, Minutes ~PROVtD DRAFT
December 12, 196
Page 3 of 7
Engineer are reviewing Mr. Stine's problem at the 1500 block of Wycoff
Avenue. They are to get back to the Mayor and he will report to both Mr.
Stine and the Council.
He stated he was advised by the Kitsap Visitor's & Convention Bureau that
there is two proposed reunions scheduled to be held in Bremerton; one for
the crew of the USS Wasp and one for the crew of the USS Tennessee. It is
projected that each will bring approximately 300-500 people into the area.
He reported that he attended a meeting of the Economic Development Council
with Planning Director Gero and people from Seattle.
COUNCIL M~tBERS REPORTS
#1513 CounciLman Johnson presented a request from the Audit committee to appoint
Councilman Phil Drouin as an alternate.
#1539 · M/S/C/U/(Johnson/Pachek) to approve the request for appointment, as an alter-
nate, of Phil Drouin to the Audit C~¥~,~ttee.
Councilman Arno expressed concern that Councilman did not suk~mit the names of
those in their districts to serve as committeemen on the Cu'L~rehensive Plan/Map
and Zoning Ordinance cor~nittee being newly formed. He asked if anyone had
objection to this methodology with Councilman Johnson stating yes because
he questioned the authority of either the Planning Director or Council to
do this. Planning Director Gero stated that Assistant City Attorney Jane
Kohler is preparing a response which City Attorney Broughton affirmed.
Councilman Arno still felt that names should be provided now however Councilman
Bz~rian asked when the legal opinion would be available with Broughton stating
by the end of the week. Councilman Amo stated that,asst~ming Councilman John-
son is advised by the end of the week, he would hope that Councilman could be
prepared to sukmmit names by Tuesday of next week.
Councilman Drouin noted the next Wastewater conmzittee meeting would be Decem-
ber 20, 1984. He also reported the progress and ccmpetance of the new Accountant
Ms. lacy Brunetti. He also stated that District #7 is supporting the YMCA
Agreement before Council this evening.
Councilman Sturdivant stated that he and Councilman Pachek attended a program
in conjunction with King County officials last evening in the King Dome to
benefit underpriledged children and they represented the City of Bremerton
and credit was given to both the City and the Bremerton Lion's Club.
Councilman Homing noted several Council members at the 4:00 p.m. study session
with the Planning Co~,~ttee. He stated he endorses the conm~ttee's process
and encouraged Councilmen to get the names of their district representatives
in as soon as possible.
Councilman Pachek stated the Parks Committee meetings are continuing and it
is hoped that a draft will be available within two weeks. He said that the
Golf Course Board met today and presently are working with the 1985 Budget.
6:30 p.m. recessed; 6:45 p.m. reconvened.
KITSAP COUNTY YMCA CONCESSION A~R~MENT, ~AB84-590
Ms. McCluskey presented the revised Kitsap County YMCA Concession Agreement
and noted that the total square footage, where left blank, is 19,000 sq. ft.
The Agreement was prepared by the City Attorney and reviewed by the Parks
Cc~mission in public session and unanimously endorsed after both the City
and the YMCA agreed to delete references or indications that the YMCA
would operate the Municipal Pool. The Agreement now before Council eliminates
all references to the YMCA operating the Pool. It was rec~nended that the
Council endorse unanimously as a kick-off to their Building Fund dirve.
Mayor Dawkins stated many hours were spent developing the final Agreement.
He then introduced Glenn Godfrey, Director of the YMCA who will speak.
Councilman Sturdivant stated his concerns and that of his constituents were
addressed by the revised document. City Attorney Broughton stated that patrons
will be treated more fairly and noted changes made to include (Pg. 5, para 8a.)
"Membership in the Kitsap Family YMCA will entitle an individual to non-
instructional use of the City pool facility at no additional Charge. YMCA members
will pay normal public fee cb~arges for any instructional swimming classes
offered by City at City pool facility". Pg. 6 - added sentence under "perform-
ing arts" Sec. c. and sentence added under "fee cc~mittee", Pg. 6, e.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes ~tPPROVED DRAFT
December 12, 198
Page 4 of 7
Councilman Sturdivant requested tb~ first change to be more acceptable
to the public and too that the YMCA will pay the City 20% of the member-
ship fee, regardless if the mamber uses the Peel facility. Councilman
Amc asked whether the most recent changes have affected the YMCA's posi-
tion. Mr. Godfery responded that it is acceptable with his Board.
Mr. Glenn Godfrey explained the history of the proposed agreement and stated
this woul~d be a unique facility whereby the co0a/m~ity and YMCA were pooling
resources. He apologized that the management of the pool did come up but
felt the issue was resolved by the revised draft. He said that the YMCA is
merely purchasing dead-time available in the Municipal Pool and should be
able to off-set operating expenses for the City. He said that only 20 - 25
percent of the Y membership will actually used the pool however the Y has
agreed to pay the city 20% per member fee for the use.
Mr. Ed Sheldon, Chairman/Fund Raising Campaign, stated this will be the lar-
gest charitable fund raising event ever held in this c~nity. The project is
based on the "family" concept and if it were to fail, Mr. Sheldon thought it
would be the last of a YMCA facility in the Bre~erton area. He then pre-
sented an artist's conception of the proposed facility. He said the facility
will be centrally located and cheaper to build new than atten~pt to repair
the existing site.
Ms. Linda Gleason,l127 Walnut, spoke in opposition of the proposed Agreement.
Mr. Carl Cramer, YMCA Board Chairman, stated the citizens of Bremerton are
the people to benefit.
Ms. Marylou Long expressed concerns over costs for the public vs cost for
YMCA members to use the Municipal Pool; question the possible conflict of
interest because of the logo name "Young Men's Christian Association".
Attorney Bill Broughton stated that he revie~d the Policies of the "Y",
and the agreement clearly states the organization will not discriminate because
of race, color or creed, etc., and the agreement is available for Ms. Long's
perusal.
Mr. Glenn Jarstad, Former Mayor/City of Bre~nerton, 2823 Hefner presented
~i?~ p~titions which emphasized that the citizens wanted the City to remain
owner/operator of the MtaiicJpal Pool, however, since the last revision of
the Agreement, he a satisfied that ~_he issue is resolved. He hoped that Council
TAPE #202 will pursue future possibility of the City jc.J~t]y able to use the YMCA faci-
lity for Parks purposes and closing stated he encouraged unanimous support.
~0079 · M/S/C/U/(Adrian/Sturdivant) to approved the proposed Kitsap County YMCA Con-
cession Agreement, as revised, including Councilman Sturdivant's revision
Pg. 5, line #19, "Membership in the Kitsap Family YMCA will entitle ~ indi-
vidual to non-instructional use cf the City pool facility at no additional
charge. YMCA n~nbers will pay normal public fee charges for any instructional
swinl~J_ng classes offered by City at City Pool facility".
Councilman Drouin was concerned whether, prior to construction, a site plan
would be required with City Attorney stating it was covered in the Agreement.
OPJDINANCE (1ST READING) AMENDING ORDINANCE #3709, SEC. 1, RELATING TO CON-
D±'±'IONS IMPOSED ON THE (Anderson) REZONE, #AB84-598
Ms. McCluskey presented a request frc~ the Planning Department to amend the
conditions imposed on Ordinance #3709. In fall of 1983 the Planning Cc~nission
reccnn~nded approval of the rezone, with conditions; On December 28, 1984, the
City Council approved such request. Before such action can be done and the
special conditions to be met, Concomitant Zoning Agreement is required and
attached. Planning staff recc~nended approval.
Mr. Joe Gero, Planning Director, stated that the problem occurred when review-
lng the document, it was found that several of the conditions were found add-
ressed in the Zoning ordinance or other documents therefore not necessary.
Since cc~mencing the new procedures, when approving rezones, the Anderson rezone
is now back with new type of Conconmitant Zoning Agreement. Bob Duffy, Planner
gave examples of those areas that would be deleted and those that will remain.
Counci/men expressed several concerns that changing the document a year later
may not make the document valid and that when approved originally in December
of 1983, both the applicant and the City agree to the terms of the Agreement.
City Attorney Broughton stated the pr~nent was not agreeable however it is
now cleared up. It was also questio~,l~w could an ordinance that was passed
never been written. Councilman Homing felt conditions were not lessened.
City Council Reg Mtg. Minutes UNBODROVED DPJtFT
December 12, 19~
Page 5 of 7
#0913 · M/S/(Homing/Anderson) to approve ordinance (lst reading), amending Ordi-
nance No. 3709, Section 1, relating to conditions imposed on Anderson rezone.
Mr. Bert Gegner concerned about action Council was entertaJ_ning. Does not
understand after one year circumstance warrants a new ordirk~nce which may
alter conditions. Councilman Anderson stated that the hearings were done and
it is not the fault of the proponents. Councilman Arno not~ it was not the
Agreement made a year age and what would happen if not passed tonight.
City Attorney Broughton stated that there was a one-year moratori~ to reapply
so they could reapply.
Counci/man Arno urged fellow Councilmen to vote the ordinance down and ccme
before a clean hearing. If voted down he would ask for a hearing
reopening concerning the rezone.
Councilman Horning stated he would support if voted down, only non-enforceable
items.
Mr. Jim Straight, 6530 Harlow, noted that if Council voted to place restrictions
applicant can accept or reject, but Council either approves or disapproves.
Mr. Charles Palmer, Representative for Property Owners, st~ted his clients
have found a qualified buyer for the parcel and it needs to be a B-2 zoning
with conditions. Councilman Adrian was concerned that we could not take
public testimony with Attorney Bill Broughton stating he was correct, however,
cannot go into merits of hearing. Mr. Broughton continued that Council would
need to either reopen hearing or send property owner papers being sure an
agreement was reached.
Councilmen Homing (Motion) and Anderson (Second) both withdrew previous motion.
#1465 · M/S/C/U/(Drouin/Pachek) to table Ordinance (lst Reading) a~nding ordinance
#3709, Sec. 1, relating to conditions imposed on the Anderson rezone~ for two
weeks for further review
ORDINANCE (1ST READING) UNIFORM CONTROL OF GRADING & DRAINeR]E, #AB84-601
Ms. McCluskey presented an ordinance (lst Reading) providing for uniform control
of grading & drainage. City Attorney Broughton gave the Council a smm~ry
of the contents which included; Ptmrt~se, Compliance with Federal to local
laws, Public benefit, Compliance by owner, Definitions, Drainage Control Plan,
requirements, Review & Approval of Plans, Drainage Control Facilities and
Containment Systems/Bonding, Inspections, Modifications, M~intenance,
Deficiency & Correction, etc. Councilman Sturdivant suggested that there should
be a Public Hearing or Study Session on such a complex Ordinance (24 pages)
because he thought Council had not had the time to review such a lengthly
document.
Councilman Homing felt the ordinance, in it's
presented draft, was difficult to understand. He went fur~er to say that
anyone planning to build would have problems with ordinance. Councilman
Johnson stated the ordinance should not get hung up on environmental issues.
Councilman Anderson agrees that ordinance should be tabled.. Councilman Horning
suggested the City Engineers and outside independent Engineers review and
make reconmendation.
#1957 · M/S/C/(Adrian/Sturdivant) to table and refer ordinance, providing for uniform
control of grading and drainage, to the Planning Conmittee for study and
review. VOTE: In favor (7); Amo Opposed
ORDINANCE (1ST READING) MANAC~Sb~N~ BENEs'ITS, #AB84-602
City Clerk McCluskey presented an ordinance (lst Reading) setting forth a
benefit plan for non-union management personnel. Personnel director Dave
Hiestand stated that Senate Bill 843 has impacted the original ordinance
which has caused a rewrite because of issues of Military Leave, Retirement
payoff, etc.
Councilman Adrian questioned pg. #1, pg. 5, "Physical" and who defines.
Mr. Hiestand explained that it is a wellness physical which includes weight,
heart, etc. Councilman Adrian felt that someone should set the standard
such as the Personnel Director. Mr. Hiestar~ went ~f~er to state that the
· . .r-or worx~ .~o, .
physical, because the C~ty ms Self-Insured,/ms a pr~%~lvem~]ical program
that should prevent sick leave abuse by addressing a proble~n in it's infancy.
Councilman Anderson could not see the benefit of a City paid physical.
Councilman Homing disagreed stating the affected employee,, with knowledge of
a medical problem, may have a attitude change, less time loss, and certainly
corrective measures would be required. Councilman Pachek asked if companies
like Boeing, etc. have plans of this nature implemented wif~ Mr. Hiestand
stating he had not done a survey of this type. Several ccmpanies do but he
could not state which specifically.
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes UNAPPROVED DRAFT
December 12, 19F
Page 6 of 7
Councilman Sturdivant had several concerns that verbiage was changed,
added, deleted, etc. and requested justification. Mr. Hiestand clarified
that the document before Council tonight is different than the previous
doc%tnent to separate out the organization portion which Council agreed
to review after the November election. Failure of that portion caused
deletion of much of the verbiage. Under Sick Leave benefits, Administra-
tion sensed discomfort with the 240 hours, therefore it was reduced to
200 hours, and he continued to explain the difference between active and
set-aside accounts of accrual. Mr. Hiestand also explained the problem
of several individuals who had up to 1000 hours banked and instead of
getting into a cash payoff problem, it was handled in the ordinance draft.
On page 5, January 20th instead of the 15th was due to the tin~ frame of
ordinance passage, ass~ning the Council passed first reading this evening.
Mr. Hiestand also addressed the issue of Military Leave as defined in
RCW 38.30. 060 which states the e~ployee will earn his regular salary plus
any military compensation which is also covered under Federal Title X.
Mr. Hiestand expressed concern that, to enable computer set-u~implementation,
consideration should be given tonight to pass first reading of the ordi-
nance.
Mr. Bert Gegner could not see where an e~ployee physical benefit anyone except
the employee. He stated he felt it was a luxury.
Ms. Judith Katsirubas, City Auditor, noted that when claims drop, so do
#2002 insurance premiums paid for group coverage.
#2017 · M/S/C/(Adrian/Johnson) to approve Ordinance, first reading, setting forth
a benefit plan for non-union maD~gement personnel with two amendments;
(1) Pg. 1, Footnote #1 - addendum verbiage "The scope to be defined by
the Personnel Director". (2) Pg. 4, G., last sentence - addendum verbiage
e~ployee's sick leave, "or annual leave". VOTE: In favor; Homing, Pachek,
Drouin, Arno, Adrian & Johnson. Opposed; Anderson & Sturdivant.
KITSAP PUBLIC SERVICES, INC. - REQUEST FOR RATE INCREASES - 1985, #AB84-600
Ms. McCluskey presented a request frcm Kitsap Public Services (KPS) for
propcse~ rate increases for 1985. It was noted that the requested increases
are similar or identical to those passed the previous week for Olympic
Ambulance Company. Councilman Drouin asked if Mr. Pat Tucker, owner, would
agree to inserting, under night charge, "£~cm 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m." which
Mr. Tucker said he was agreeable to. Ai~D to reduce the fee frc~n extra
attendant, from $25.00 to $21.00, agaiD ~hich Mr. Tucker agreed.
#2138 · M/S/(Drouin/Adrian) to approved the request frc~ Kitsap Publ2~ Services, Inc.
for 1985 rate increases with two amendments; (1) Night Charge - ad~dendum of
verbiage "6:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m." and, (2) Extra Attendant - reducing ~he
figure from $25.00 to $21.00.
Mr. Bert Gegner, reco~ended that Council not approve because he understood
that, according to ordinance and discussion last week, Olympic Ambulance met
the time frame and Kitsap Public Ambulance did not. He felt also there was
a collusion in the rates sutxaitted by the two Ambulance companies.
MS. McCluskey defined the ordinance as revision one month before it is effective.
VOTE: In favor; Pachek, Anderson, Drouin, Adrian & Johnson (5)
Opposed; Sturdivant, Homing (2)
Abstain; Amo (1)
Motion PASSED
KITSAP LAKE STATemENT OF LEGISLATION INTENT TO PROC~, #AB84-599
Ms. McCluskey read a reques% from the Planning depar~men% for ~]le Ki%sap Lake
Statement of Legislation Intent to Proceed. When the City of Bremerton applied
for funding (Phase I) through the Department of Ecology to prepare a restoration
analysis and watershed management plan for Kitsap T~ke, the City agreed as a
condition that it would apply for a Phase II grant to complete the work neces-
sary as identified by the original restoration analysis. Further the City
agreed that it would provide a boat launch and park at Kitsap Lake as a pre-
condition of accepting the Phase I grant regardless of whether the restoration
was acutally completed at the lake. This resolution sets forth the intent
of the City Council to effectuate that pc.rtion of the grant agrecment between
the Department of Ecology and the City tc provide the boat launch and parks
facilities. It is recc~mended that the City Council pass this resolution and
proceed with the development of the Kitsap Lake Park and Boat Launch.
City Council Reg Mtg. Minutes ~m~IPPROVED DRAFT
December 12, 19~
Page 7 of 7
Mr. Joe Gero, Planning Director, stated that with Council approval, a
dollar amount must be set aside as a condition of the Grant. He stated
we can file application but do not have to accept. He explained that
sc~e equipment could be borrowed from the County such as a Harvester.
He said that the Grant will be matched funding and has bcc~n previously
applied for by Parametrix who would make this application.
Councilman Homing asked what would happen if we did not make this applica-
#3205 tion with Mr. Gero responding that the State would probably take a dim
view of future applications. He further stated the purpose of the Grant
was to create water quality in Kitsap Lake. Councilman Johnson stated that
if we have the option to turn down at a later date, we have nothing to
lose by making the requested application.
TAPE #203
#0176 · M/S/C/U/(Johnson/Adrian) to approve Resolution #2052, a Resolution of the
City of Br~nerton, ~A, City Council stating it's intent to file an applica-
tion with the Inter-agency cc~ttee for Outdoor Recreation to provide
recreational facilities at Kitsap l~ke~, to include the development of a
Kitsap Lake Park and Boat Launch, Items #3 and #6, eliminating items #1, #2,
#4, & #5.
Discussion followed with Councilman Adrian expressing concern, that what
if the $25,000 is not set aside. Director Gero stated that the City has
said that it will provide public access to Kitsap t~ke by 1987.
With no further business, meeting adjourned at 10:03 p.m.
KATHI.E~N L. MCCLUSKEY, City Clerk
City of Br~nerton
APPROVED:
City Council