HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/26/88TAPE #584
UNAPPROVED DRAFT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 26, 1988
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton
was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4Th Street,
Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, October 26, 1988 at 5:30 p.m.,
with Council President Hank Waibel presiding. Council members
present were Lon Overson, Lynn Horton, C. R. "Tiny" Collins,
Shirley Marry Crutcher and Russ Johnson, Spencer Horning, Morrie
Dawkins and A1 Colvin Also present were City Attorney Ian
Sievers and Deputy City Clerk Gil Johnson.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council
President Hank Waibel and Invocation was given by Reverend A. H.
Lubkemann of Memorial Lutheran Church.
o~-a
037
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of Meeting held - October 12, 1988, #AB88-245
M/S/C/U(Horning/Horton) to approve Consent Agenda as presented.
CLAIMS/WARRANT REGISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the
required by RCW 42.24.080, and those
claims certified as required by RCW
recorded on a listing which has been
council.
auditing officer as
expense reimbursement
42.24,090, have been
made available to the
M/S/C/U(Colvin/Dawkins) on October 26, 1988, the Council does
approve for payment those vouchers included and further described
as follows: 39322 through 39425 in the total amount of
$94,063.93.
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS
Mr. Overson noted the Candidate Forum held on October 24 was
excellent and he was glad to see this type of programming being
done over the Cable Access Channel.
Mrs. Hotton reported that her daughter's third grade class at
Crown Hill Elementary School is participating in an "election"
event beginning with registering to vote with a voters card,
holding a Primary Election and they will hold their General
Election on November 8. Mrs. Horton commended this type of
activity in helping our young people to understand the workings
of governmental entities.
Mr. johnson reported that there is effort within the community to
provide a memorial to Vietnam Veterans through the possible
acquisition of the USS Turner Joy. He noted that this effort is
not to try and replace the USS Missouri but to provide a way to
truly recognize the individuals who served in the Vietnam War.
Mr. Johnson stated his full support to the efforts that are being
undertaken in this direction.
Mr. Colvin reported that a potential traffic problem was
discussed during the recent Sheridan Neighborhood Association
meeting - held October 20 - and that he had invited a number of
citizens to come to todays City Council meeting to express their
concern to the full Council relating to traffic safety at the
intersection of Pine Rd. and Sylvan Way. Also, during that same
meeting discussion was held regarding the proposed wastewater
rate increase and the need for prior public notice of any agenda
items which may mean an increase in costs to the citizens. He
suggested that money issues be advertised in the newspaper so
~547
TAPE #584
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
October 26, 1988
Page 2 of 10
that a broader base of citizens could be made aware of future
Council actions which would affect them financially. President
Waibel noted that the proposed wastewater rate increase was heard
three weeks prior to first reading of the Ordinance. Mr. Colvin
expressed concern that the City should have a standard policy
regarding publicizing proposed increased costs for the citizens.
Mr. Collins reported the Council Public Works Committee had met
this date, at which time it was learned that the problem with
Bremerton Gardens is being worked on very diligently between the
City, property owner and the State Housing Commission.
Mr. Waibel reported that the Manette Neighborhood Association met
on October 20 and had a two hour discussion period.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
5A - RESOLUTION #2231, DESIGNATION OF FIREARM RANGE AS THE
"SERGEANT GED W. HONSOWETZ POLICE FIREARM TRAINING FACILITY,
#AB88-246
Because of his 23 years dedication to Police Science, as an
active member of the Bremerton Police Department, Sergeant Ged
Honsowetz is being recognized for his individual contributions to
the Police Firearms Range.
In addition, the Bremerton Police Department also wants to
recognize Sergeant Honsowetz for his unselfish contributions as a
line officer with the presentation of a plaque for services.
Mayor Gene Lobe read into the record Resolution #2231 which
outlined Ged's service in the Police Department from April 26,
1965 to present, his health setback at the present time, his
dedication to the community and his family, the volunteer hours
he gave to improve firearm training of officers as well as
improving the firearms facility itself; and the declaration by
Mayor Lobe and the Bremerton City Council to proclaim the Police
Range as "Sergeant Ged W. Honsowetz Police Firearm Training
Facility".
Actina Police Chief Joe Hatfield introduced Judy Honsowetz, Ged's
wife, and then briefly explained that a sign will be placed at
the firearm range with the new designation. Also, Capt.
Hatfield presented a plaque to Ged, on behalf of the Bremerton
Police Department, which stated "Sergeant Ged W. Honsowetz-
1965 to 1988 - for your loyalty and dedication to the Bremerton
Police Department the Police Firearms Training Facility is hereby
dedicated in your name "Sergeant Ged W. Honosowetz Firearms
Training Facility" October 26, 1988. Included on the plaque was
one of Sgt. Honsowetz's Sergeant badge. Judy Honsowetz accepted
the plaque with great honor for her husband. She read a
statement prepared by Ged which reflected his thanks for not only
the honor but for hiring an innocent boy as a police office in
1965. He thanked past officers who helped him to grow in his
knowledge as a Police Officer, his opportunities for technical
training in firearms, and for his part as the Police team
protecting the citizens of Bremerton. Mayor Gene Lobe presented
Ged with a City of Bremerton hat.
M/S/C/U(Dawkins/Colvin) to approve Resolution #2231, designating
the firearms qualification area as the "Sergeant Ged W. Honsowetz
Police Firearm Training Facility".
Pat Carey, 108-B Oak, spoke on the safety of the intersection of
Sylvan Way and Pine Road. He related that a number of citizens
spoke up at that meeting about their concern for the need of a
traffic light in order to keep someone from being killed.
TAPE #584
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
October 26, 1988
Page 3 of 10
Shirley Borcherdina, 447 Sylvan- Way, expressed concern over the
traffic hazard at the intersection of Pine Rd., and Sylvan Way
and felt that something more than the stop signs is needed.
Pat Cook, 2510 Reid, stated she had personally witnessed three or
four accidents at the intersection of Pine Rd. & Sylvan Way and
feels that something should be done to improve ~he safety of the
intersection.
Mrs. Liebmann, 3309 Pine Rd., stated she had lived at her
residence for 15 years and have assisted many vehicle accident
victims ~ in vehicles= collisions at the intersection of Pine Rd.,
and Sylvan Way. She noted that she and her neighbors are
becoming proficient in determining which Police agency needs to
be called - City police or County Sheriff's department. She
also suggested that possibly the City and County could work
together in getting a light installed at the intersection.
Hank Park, active member in the Sheridan Neighborhood
Association, stated he had witnessed a number of vehicle
accidents at the intersection of Pine Rd., and Sylvan Way. He
suggested that Council members drive in that area around 5:00
p.m. to see the traffic flow and problems that arise. He
stressed the importance of the City not waiting to do something
until someone gets killed and/or the possibility of the City
getting sued now that they have been made aware of the traffic
hazard.
Dale Swanson stated he artended the recent Sheridan Neighborhood
Association meeting where he heard about the traffic hazard at
Pine Rd. and Sylvan Way and urged the Council to study the
situation. President Waibel requested the Deputy City Clerk to
notify the City Engineer to contact the County Engineer on this
issue
Roy McInnis and Latisha Cunninaham, 2711 Maple Street, expressed
concern that the Council Agenda had been removed from Channel 29.
President Waibel stated that the Agenda is shown on Channel 29
but is rotated about once every 17 minutes and requested Mr.
Johnson to look into this matter and see if it could be shown
twice during that time cycle.
6A - ANNEXATION NOTICE WEST HILLS EhEMENTARY SCHOOl, #AB88-247
Bremerton School Board District 100-C submitted a notice of
intent to commence annexation proceedings to incorporate its West
Hills Elementary School property into the Bremerton City limits.
The City Council is to meet with any representatives of the
School District who attend the meeting, discuss the proposal, and
determine:
(1) whether to accept the annexation;
(2)
whether to require assumption of existing City
indebtedness, as a condition to the proposed
annexation; and
(3) whether to require simultaneous adoption of proposed
zoning legislation, as a condition to the proposed
annexation.
President Waibel questioned if an actual 104 petition existed?
Ian Sievers, City Attorney, stated there are two documents that
the property owners submit for Council action, a Notice of Intent
and a Petition... one by State Statute is supported by 104 of
assessed valuation and the other is supported by 754. Assertion
of the 104 is indicated by the first line in the Notice of
Intent. President Waibel stated for clarification that basically
TAPE #584
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
October 26, 1988
Page 4 of 10
recommended action is to agree
intent with the 10% showing.
to meet and also accept their
Dick Chichester, 825 Merrill Drive, spoke in opposition to the
annexation request and questioned if anyone from the Navy Yard
area had been invited to attend the Council meeting. He noted
that previous attempts to annex the Navy Yard area had met with
defeat and he knew of no one who desires to be annexed into the
City. President Waibel suggested that Mr. Chichester contact the
School District to find out why they wish to annex this
particular property into the City. Mr. Chichester stated he
believed that the City had requested the School District to
consider annexing into Bremerton.
Harry Chichester, 825 Merrill Drive, stated he understood it was
the School District's right to want to annex into the City of
Bremerton, however, the majority of the residents of Navy Yard
City are not interested in 'annexing. He noted there are many
questions that are unanswered, such as what will be the outcome
to the citizens...what is going to happen to the property
surrounding the school...what is going to happen to District 8
Fire Department, is there any possibility that the Fire District
become part of Bremerton? If the property is annexed what will
the outcome be to the citizens.
Gil Johnson, Deputy City Clerk, read a letter into the record
from the Westside Improvement. Club which cited their opposition
to the proposed annexation actions and questioned why the
Environmental Check List did not include a statement that the
school was built over a refuse landfill.
Mr. Dawkins questioned if this would be just setting a date for
another hearing? President Waibel stated Council would be
accepting the Notice Of Intent and 10% showing for annexation.
Don Pratt, Director of Community Development, stated as the
designated responsible official under the State Environmental Act
for the City of Bremerton, it is his responsibility to ensure
.that the Environmental Check Lists are properly and adequately
filled out and it is his responsibility to determine if it is an
acceptable check list and to accept it on behalf of the City.
Once the applicant prepares it and the City accepts it, then it
is the City's document. The Check List must cover any
environmental impacts of the proposed action. The proposed
action is a switch in jurisdiction from the County to the City.
This switch in jurisdiction does not carry with it nor proposes
any physical changes to the environment. If there ever was
a proposal to change in any way then a new Environmental Check
List would be required and the environmental impacts with
proposed change would be required. Because of that reason Mr.
Pratt did not consider any further information on whether there
was a fill site or what the fill site consisted of as pertinent
to the switch in jurisdiction.
Mr. Johnson questioned when and where would the City Council be
meeting with the School District, during a public hearing,
Council Study Session, etc.? Mr. Pratt stated the formal meeting
where Council will make the decision is at the 75~ submittal
which will be a duly advertised and public meeting. There will
be a series of preliminary discussions between the administration
and the applicant prior to that meeting; and a report and
recommendations from the Mayor will be forthcoming based on those
meetings for the Council's formal consideration of the request to
annex. Mr. Johnson indicated the formal date would have to be 60
days after September 6. Mr. Pratt stated that the meeting and
response has to be occur within 60 days of this date.
556
TAPE #584
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
October 26, 1988
Page 5 of 10
M/S/C/U(Johnson/Collins) that the City Council
preliminary acceptance of the proposed annexation.
does a
Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, stated because of. the tax exempt
nature of the property under consideration makes the question of
assumption of existing city indebtedness a moot issue and that is
why it was suggested that the City respond in the negative.
President Waibel questioned for clarification that in this
instances there is no City indebtedness to assume? Mr. Hanna
stated that the existing City indebtedness is supported by excess
property tax levies because the property in question is owned by
a municipal corporation and exempt from property taxes - they
would not pay property tax either way.
Mr. Johnson stated his concern that someday the School District
might sell the property to private owner - if the City should
wave the right of indebtedness is this in the best interest of
the City? Mr. Hanna stated what they would be assuming is
current outstanding indebtedness and it is reasonable to assume
that the school would last considerably longer than the City's
indebtedness since the school facility is brand new. President
Waibel pointed out it would be for all pre-existing indebtedness
not what would happen to indebtedness incurred after transition.
Mr. Colvin questioned if the School sold off part of the
property would that portion be exempt also? Mr. Sievers stated
it would be exempt from existing indebtedness and he supported
Mr. Hanna's statement that considering there is a new school
facility on the property one would assume they would not be
putting the property back on the tax rolls for the foreseeable
future or the life of the current facility. President Waibel
questioned what is the current life of the indebtedness? Mr.
Hanna stated the longest current outstanding bonded indebtedness,
that is supported by excess property tax levies, would be the
1983 issue which would run through the year 2003.
762
M/S/C/U(Horning/Colvin) we would not require assumption of
existing debt as long as that property is non-taxable but upon
receiving different status then it would be excepted.
Mr. Johnson noted for the record that the proposed motion is Item
#2 in the School Board's letter and Item #3 on the front of the
Agenda Bill. Also, he questioned if the City would be suggesting
the Zone at this time? Mr. Sievers stated there is a trickiness
with timing and the old ordinance when it might go into effect.
Under the'present Zoning Ordinance it would go automatically to
R-1. Mr. Johnson stated that if it reverted to a R-1 designation
it would be eligible under the new Zoning Ordinance to go through
the errors and corrections process established along with the new
ordinance. President Waibel questioned what the normal process
would be for establishing a zone for a new annexed area? Mr.
Pratt explained there are two processes of review. The current
Zoning Ordinance says that if no action is taken at all the
property would be annexed as R-l, which is what is being proposed
at this time. The other process is to go through a simultaneous
zoning, which had been previously done using the Planning
Commission as a hearing and coming to Council as a
recommendation. The Zoning Ordinance currently protects any
properties which are annexed to the City and which are legally
zoned for the use on them now, it protects them as non-
conformities in the new Zoning designation for the City. Mr.
Pratt stated Mr. Johnson is correct that there will be a note
made under the correction and errors process regardless of what
designation is given.
i955 M/S/C/U(Johnson/Colvin) the City Council will require adoption of
TAPE #584
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
October 26, 1988
Page 6 of 10
substantial compliance of Zoning in compliance with the City's
Comprehensive Plan which would be R-1 in present laws and that
the School District and staff would be authorized to convert that
R-1 designation to the new Zoning Ordinance designation for
school houses during the errors and corrections process.
310
,'442
6B - DTS ELECTRONICS LEASE, #AB88-248
The City had a lease with Tribune Publishing Company for tower
site n Gold Mountain since 1982. Tribune recently liquidated and
this site is being purchased by DTS Electronics. The lease is
for 10 years with a 10 year renewal, base rent is $353.55 per
month tied to an annual CPI or 15~ of Leasees gross revenue at
the site, whichever is higher. Currently they are paying the
City $515.00 per month based upon gross revenue. The City and
DTS share the tower and building space on the site as shown by
the map. Revenue goes to the Utility. Also included was a
Consent to Assignment of Lease required by the bank financing
DTS acquisition.
Allan Robinson, owner of DTS Electronics, requested the City to
recognize he and his wife as the new lessee for the property.
Mr. Hornina questioned for clarification that what is being
proposed is continuation of a 10 year lease? Ian Sievers, City
Attorney, stated he characterized it as a negotiated new lease,
it does have a full new 10 year term and there was one minor
change in compensation as well...the City is a co-user of the
tower - giving them $10.00 transmitter credit against electrical
use the City is using. Mr. Hornina questioned why a new lease
was prepared and the previously one not continued? Mr. Robinson
stated there were two items in the old lease which the City of
Bremerton wanted changed: (1) desire to do away with any other
lessees other than the single owner; (2) CenCom requesting
additional room in one of the rooms that was shared with other
agencies and desired the room be vacated and be used strictly
.by City and County. He agreed to move any equipment other
than City and County from that room, providing necessary cables,
labor, etc.
Mr. Johnson questioned if Mr. Robinson would object to having
decorative lights placed on the tower? Mr. Robinson stated he
had no objection as long as the electrical connections were made
properly and maintained.
M/S/C/U(Horning/Crutcher) to approve lease with DTS Electronics
and Consent to Assignment of Lease and Leasehold Deed Of Trust.
6C - SURPLUS OF CITY VEHICLE, #AB88-249
On September 24, 1988, Vehicle No. 1432, a 1988 Chevrolet
Celebrity police car was involved in a traffic accident and
sustained extensive damage. Based on. estimated repair costs,
staff has determined that it is in the best interest of the City
not to undertake repair of the vehicle, but rather to remove any
usable parts/equipment and dispose of the vehicle.
Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, stated this was the second new Police
vehicle that-had met an untimely end. A local firm had made an
analysis of possible repair of the vehicle and coupled with the
salvage of the vehicle in its present condition it was determined
that it would be in the best to declare it as a loss and that it
be sold in its present condition.
M/S/C/U(Dawkins/Collins) to declare Vehicle No. 1432 surplus and
direct that it be disposed of in the best interest of the City.
TAPE #584
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
October 26, 1988
Page 7 of 10
6D - RENEWAL OF VEHICLE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT, NOVEMBER 1, 1988-
OCTOBER 31, 1989, #AB88-250
The City's contract for vehicle maintenance calls for annual
budget figure to be agreed upon. The first year of the contract
amounted to $453,483. In the current year, the budget is
$431,641. The proposed budget for the
10/31/89 is $497,781.
Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, stated the
represents the third and final year
period 11/1/88 through
renewal of the contract
with Managed Logistics
Systems, Inc., for the operation of the garage. The amount
proposed for the third year contract is significantly higher than
the first two years with the primary factor being determination
by the State Department of Revenue that the labor and profit
portion of the contract as subject to State Sales Tax. This was
not known to the contractor - it was an error they made in
pricing the first two years of their contract. They became aware
of the error approximately six months ago and accounts for the
majority of the price increase reflected between years two and
three.
Mr. Johnson stated he had heard previously that the new Police
vehicles were experiencing some brake problems, however, he had
been reassured that there were not any problems. Now, as part of
the proposed contract it sh6ws allowances for 5 Police patrol
cars upgrading of brakes...why is it necessary to upgrade these
brakes? Mr. Hanna stated he did not know who may have made any
statements regarding the brakes. Based on everything he was
aware of at this point there had been documentation to the fact
that there are problems with the brakes on the Celebrities, their
brakes do heat up during pursuit situations. It is the
recommendation of the contractor to upgrade the brakes with both
the Acting Police Chief and City's Risk Manager in agreement both
from a liability and economic standpoint to spend the money to
retrofit the brakes on the Celebrities to a heavy duty brake
system. Mr. Johnson noted that supposedly when Police vehicles
are purchased they generally come with heavy duty transmissions,
cooling system, etc., why are we not going back to General Motors
on this issue. Mr. Hanna stated the police vehicles, as sold to
the City, were sold per the specs the City provided - Chief
Coney developed the spec. Mr. johnson stated his understanding
that the specs were from the State. Mr. Gil johnson noted they
were not the State standard specifications they were
specifications prepared by former Chief Coney based on City of
Redmond specifications. Mr. Collins questioned if the Pursuit
Manual had been developed? Mr. Hanna stated he was not prepared
to answer that question - it would have to be addressed to the
Police Department. Mr. Colvin cautioned it may not be the
vehicle's fault. Mr. Johnson strongly felt that the problem
should be addressed back to the manufacturer. President Waibel
questioned if acceptance of the City's specs remove any warranty?
Mr. Hanna stated to his understanding yes it did - the vehicles
were provided by Chevrolet through Brooks Biddle Chevrolet by
City specs. And, to his understanding there were three levels of
braking system...heavY duty, light and medium system and for
reasons he was utterly at a loss to explain why the City's
vehicles were ordered with the lightest braking system available
on that vehicle. That is the circumstances the City and
Maintenance Contractor recognizes and that's what leads them to
the determination that it is in the best interest of the City to
spend the money to retrofit the vehicles now to avoid higher
maintenance costs in the future and an element of potential
liability.
Mrs. Horton requested a breakdown of the portion brought about
due to the sales tax issue. Mr. Gil Johnson stated the basis
contract costs for 1989 as proposed is probably $5,000 more than
-Pg #585
TAPE #584
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
October 26, 1988
Page 8 of 10
the first year of the, contract which is 1986 with the balance
being taken up in sales tax. Mr. Hanna stated in order to
compare more directly, the contractors proposal is $458,000 plus
applicable State and local taxes. Mrs. Horton questioned since
the contractor did not charge the City tax for the previous two
years can they come back and seek it from the City? Mr. Hanna
stated they can come back and seek it from the City, however, it
is a matter of negotiation whether we consider it as an excess
cost item solely born by the City or as a cost that is under the
budget provisions of the current contact, in which case if we run
over the budget amount in the current contract, which is
$431,000, then that cost would be shared betwee~ the City and the
contractor by a ratio that is dictated by the contract.
Roy McInnis, 2711 Maple Street, stated he was speaking from a
professional standpoint and he did not support the contractor's
determination of costs for retrofitting the braking systems. In
his opinion only the brake lining and switch of the master
cylinder would have to be made which should not cost as much as
the $600.00 quoted by the contractor. Mr. Colvin suggested the
issue should be further investigated.
046
M/S/C/U(Crutcher/Dawkins) to approve renewal of the City's
vehicle maintenance contract with Ryder/MLS for the period
November 1, 1988 through October 31, 1989 in the amount of
$497,781.00.
7A - ORDINANCE #4174 (SECOND READING) WASTEWATER UTILITY RATE
INCREASE, #AB88-230
Isaac Sofiario, 520 Burwell, expressed his concern and noted he
had talked with a number of individuals who were alarmed that the
rate is being raised. He questioned what percentage the City is
collecting on the notes to pay the sewer? Bill Duffy, Utilities
Manager, the capital portion of the sewer rate is a discrete fund
and those funds are maintained by the Finance Director and are
obligated to pay the bonds. Currently there is a necessity in
that portion of the fund to continue payment. The debt the City
incurred is an escalating debt over a period of years to mid
1990's and at that time it will level off and actually begin to
decrease toward final payment of the bond. So, that debt
continues to rise and is taking up any excess portion of the
revenues that may be derived. Mr. Soriano questioned what
happened to the extra money in the reserve a couple years ago?
Mr. Duffy stated the debt service to the City of Bremerton is
approximately 2.2 million dollars per year so the $200,000
reserves had been used up in the increased debt service needs.
Jerry Soriano, 509 4th Street Room 16, spoke against the idea
that the City signed a debt obligation that had a negative
amortization and questioned why the City would do something like
this? Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, stated the increases in the
debt service payment represent both the principal and interest.
The reason the payments are going up in the. near time is not
because of the negative amortization situation rather that in
incremental years we are increasing the amount of principal that
we are paying off in those given years by a rate that is greater
than the decrease in the interest payment resulting from the
retirement of a portion of the debt. President Waibel noted did
not the City consider we might be in better shape to handle the
increasing reduction of the principal through the first six
years? Mr. Hanna stated he could only speculate on the
assumptions that were made at that time because he was not part
of the decision making process. He stated, given the
circumstances at that time in 1985, Mr. Waibel's assumption was a
fair assumption. In all likelihood two things were contemplated,
TAPE #585
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
October 26, 1988
Page 9 of 10
expansion of the service base through annexation and connections
and also inflation at some level would continue through future
years and the larger debt service payments would be more easily
made because of those two factors.
Jim Adrian, 621 Washington, expressed concern that more citizens
were not in attendance at the meeting and urged the council to
not take that as a lack of interest...people are concerned over
raising of rates. He noted he was knowledgeable that a number of
Bremerton property owners have walked away from their property
due to costs they could not keep up with. He suggested that if
a rate increase is to be faced every two years then maybe the
City should look at the possibility of refinancing the bonds.
Five years ago the Council talked about addressing the issue of
parking lots and vacant property. At that time the Council
agreed to go with a user fee and would be able to address later
on. As of this date nothing is being done to charge users who
are not paying any user fees.
Isaac Soriano questioned if in the future it would be possible
for some of the Council to meet with a few people of Bremerton to
discuss issues that affect them - small people do not have a
voice. President Waibel invited Mr. Soriano to return in two
months when Mr. Duffy will be presenting different ways in
spreading this cost.
Mr. Crutcher noted he had contacted Mr. Duffy regarding the
possibility of instituting an assessment for each
household/business user in order to spread the added costs over a
larger body.
Mr. Collins recommended to the Council that a
increased rates be delayed until Mr. Duffy returns
and the wherewithal is determined.
decision on
in December
Mr. Colvin questioned what percent over the required amount to
pay the bond are we charging the users now? Mr. Duffy noted these
rates represent sufficient monies for the next two years to meet
the debt. We are not collecting monies in excess of that. We do
maintain a debt service reserve which is required under the Bond
Ordinance of one years debt payment. Mr. Colvin questioned if
the City had any other options available? Mr. Duffy explained he
was in the process of rewriting the entire Utilities section of
the B.M.C. which will attemptto straighten out the inequities of
the user fees through assessments, etc. These won't change the
revenue required. Mr. Colvin questioned what would be the
impact if a decision was delayed for two months. Mr. Duffy
explained there are two debt service paymen~ per year, one in the
fall and one in the spring. If the payments are delayed it will
just escalate the rates that much higher at a later date - over a
nine month period rather than a year.
Mr. Johnson continued to recommend that Council wait until Mr.
Duffy brings the new ordinance before the Council and he would
continue not to support the rate increase at this time. Mr.
Duffy stated he heard Council's message loud and clear and he is
actively working on the new ordinance and it is his intent to
have it before Council in December... yes, the parking lots are
being looked at and some of those areas. In addition to the
wastewater rates issue, the ordinances will cover water issues
and some of the problems in that area, also look arsurface
drainage problems in Bremerton, etc.
Mrs. Horton stated she did not believe the City Council could
afford to hold off on taking action, that they would not be
doing their job if they allowed maintenance not to be carried
1934
.089
.164
TAPE #585
City Council Rag. Mtg. Minutes
October 26, 1988
Page 10 of 10
out as needed.
Mr. Dawkins pointed out they were focusing only on the rates and
not the whole picture and he felt the Council would have to bite
the bullet and make a decision at this time.
M/S/C(Horton/Dawkins) to pass Ordinance #4174, on second reading,
amending Ordinance #3997, establishing rates and charges for
sanitary sewer service and amending B.M.C. 15.04.612.
Vote: In Favor:
Oppose:
Horton, Homing, Overson, Waibel, Dawkins
Johnson, Crutcher, Collins, Colvin
Isaac Soriano questioned if the City Council discussed with staff
issues which will have a financial impact on the citizens?
President Waibel stated yes, Council does work with staff through
the committee process.
7B - ORDINANCE #4175 (SECOND READING) AMENDING THE CITY OF
BREMERTON 1988 BUDGET, #AB88-243
M/S/C/(Horning/Colvin) to pass Ordinance #4175, on second
reading, amending Ordinance #4155 relating to the budget of the
City of Bremerton for fiscal year 1988.
Vote:
In Favor:
Oppose:
Overson, Crutcher, Horton, Horning,
Collins, Dawkins, Colvin
Johnson, Waibel
7C - RESOLUTION 2232, REOUESTING i HOUR PARKING LIMITATION 15TH
STREET (BOTH SIDES) BETWEEN WARREN AND BROADWAY, #AB88-251
The resident of 15th Street (both sides) between Warren and
Broadway have asked to have their Residential Parking Zone
changed to one (1) hour from two (2) hours. They have previously
been approved as Residential Parking Zone (old Zone #59) #10.
Both Police and Engineering have approved the time change as
noted in their response attached.
Mr. Crutcher stressed that the requested area is impacted by
students attending Olympic College.
M/S/C/U(Crutcher/Colvin) to approve Resolution #2232, providing
for i hour parking in Residential Parking Zone #10.
President Waibel announced, at 7:40 p.m.,
would be held immediately following the
discuss "personnel" issues.
an Executive Session
Council meeting to
With no further business meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Council Executive Session concluded at 8:15 p.m.
KATHLEEN L. MCCLUSKEY, CITY CLERK
APPROVED
HANK WAIBEL, Council President
City of Bremerton
KLM/HW/me
cc: Normal Distribution
Fi te/Vault