Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/05/89TAPE #623 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES APRIL 5, 1989 #0026~ #O045 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4Th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, April 5, 1989 at 5:30 p.m., with Council President Spencer Horning presiding. Council members present were Lon Overson, Shirley Marty Crutcher, Lynn Horton, Hank Waibel, Morrie Dawkins, A1 Colvin, Russ Johnson and C. R. "Tiny" Collins. Also present were City Attorney Ian Sievers and City Clerk Kathleen McCluskey. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Horning and Invocation was given by Reverend William Wambsganss of the Westside Baptist Church. President Horninq announced Items 7B and 7C had been pulled off the Agenda for one week and Item 7F had been pulled indefinitely. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of Meeting - March 22, 1989, #AB89-079 /M/S/C(Waibel/Crutcher) to approve Consent Agenda as presented. Vote: In Favor: Abstain: Overson, Crutcher, Horton, Waibel, Horning, Collins, Dawkins, Colvin Johnson CLAIMS/WARRANT REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24,090, have been recorded on a listing which has been made available to the council. M/S/C/U(Colvin/Horton) on April 5, 1989, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 42494, 42500 through 42648 for a total amount of $287,366.81 and Regular Payroll in the total amount of $378,757.19. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mr. Crutcher reported the Spokane Chamber Of Commerce has allocated $29,000 to look into the City Of Spokane's budget and Mr. Crutcher supported this type of activity from within the community. He noted he hoped the City of Bremerton would have such a review of its budget. Mr. Waibel noted a critical State Legislative issue - a number of years ago the Governor and State Legislature wrote legislation that this State would not participate in Nuclear Preparedness Testing and as a result the Federal Government has cut off Emergency funding (PEMA Funds) and the State Legislature, at that time, promised to make up any difference in emergency funds, if needed. Governor Gardner did introduce into his 1989 budget funds to replace the lost Federal funds but the Senate has removed those funds from that budget. Currently this issue is in the Ways and Means Committee and Mr. Waibel suggested that calls be made to members of the Legislator supporting retention of those funds identified to replace lost Federal funds in the Governor's budget. Legislative Hotline #1-800-562-6000. Mr. Johnson announced another team from the Veterans Administration toured Bremerton/Kitsap County in their search for property to locate a National Cemetery. USS Turner Joy Project- while in Washington D.C., Mr. Johnson came in contact with an TAPE #623 City Council Reg. Meeting Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 2 of 14 individual who was a member of the USS Turner Joy wardroom during the Vietnam War and who has been active in an alumni club for the Turner Joy. This individual has been put in contact with Mim Heuss of the VCB with the idea that past crew members belonging to the alumni club might be of assistance in setting up the Turner Joy as a monument in Bremerton. Mr. Colvin introduced Gordon Hanstad, newly installed Pastor of the Sylvan Way Baptist Church. Pastor Hanstad greeted the City Council, staff and audience and shared some thoughts on servanthood to our families, fellow workers and community as a whole. Mr. Dawkins reported he attended the opening of the Washington State Junior Bowling Association at Westpark Lanes on Saturday- April 1. Over the next four weekends approximately 1000 young people will be coming into the area to participate in that tournament. Also, he reminded everyone that on Saturday, April 8 - Bataan Park - there will be a memorial celebration honoring Prisoners Of War. Mr. Collins announced not everyone will be able to attend the event at Bataan Park on Saturday as several Council members will be working with the VCB at an event being held at Bellevue Square. Mr. Horning reported due to the Mayor being out-of-town he will hold a meeting with Ferry System personnel to discuss the new Ferry System schedule and the possibility that errors had been made which would affect the ridership of the system. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Phil Drouin, 103 Olympic Avenue, spoke in reference to KIRO News team's interview of City staff on the proposed Parking Plan. He assured the City Council that Olympic Avenue residents had contacted KIRO News requesting their investigation - not Councilman Tiny Collins. Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk, read a Proclamation with Mayor Lobe setting forth the month of APRIL as "CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH", recognizing the need for educational services and establishment of a cooperative network with local, state and national agencies for the prevention and education of child abuse. Kay Rosendal, representing Project Family, accepted the Proclamation and briefly outlined the services available through Project Family. Kathleen McCluskev, City Clerk, read a Proclamation which recognized the Busy Hands Extension Homemakers and other organizations involved in a Spring Clean-Up Campaign in the City of Bremerton for which Mayor Lobe proclaimed April 15 through 23 as "SPRING CLEAN-UP WEEK". Mary Drouin introduced Busy Hands Extension Homemakers President Rosemary Uhl. Rosemary Uhl thanked all of the club members for their tremendous efforts toward starting this project. Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk, read a Proclamation reaffirming the City's alliance and celebration of the 20 Year Anniversary of the City of Bremerton's Sister City relationship with the city of Kure, Japan. And, the support of the Bremerton Central Lions Club in the Sister City program which includes exchange of "delegations". Kathleen McCluskey, City clerk, read a Proclamation whereby Mayor Gene Lobe proclaimed April 10-14, 1989, as ARBOR WEEK and April 12 as ARBOR DAY - noting the significance of the tree resources within our State as well as the special beauty and inspiration #1079 TAPE #623 City Council Reg. Meeting Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 3 of 14 they bring to our citizens and providing valuable natural habitat. Michele Windsor, Parks and Recreation Department Naturalist, announced there will be a planting of four Nebraska Oak trees in commemoration of Arbor Day as well as the Ladies Auxiliary of the VFW planting a Camella in NAD Park in memory of MIA's and POW's. Also, in the up coming months the Bremerton Parks and Recreation Department will be putting forth a draft of its Comprehensive Tree and Trunk Ordinance for public opinion and they are hoping it will become a cornerstone for a successful Street Tree Program. 6A - BUDGET ADJUSTMENT - 1989 COMMUNITY SERVICES, #AB89-080 The 1989 budget for Community Services was adopted by the City ~Council prior to determining the actual 1988 Budget carryover and approval by HUD of the 1989 Grant funds. The actual carryover from the 1988 budget is $622,321.10 and the 1989 Grant as approved by HUD is $364,000.00. This represents an increase of $14,000.00 in 1989 Grant funds, and $34,416.10 in funds carried over from 1988 for a total increase of $48,416. Council action is requested at this time to adjust the 1989 budget to properly reflect this increase. The $34,416.00 was budgeted in 1988 but not spent by the end of the year. The $14,000 represents new dollars that need to be budgeted in 1989. Lena Swanson, 2123 Snyder, questioned if the additional $14,000 could be applied toward programs such as HOSPICE and if so she recommended that this amount be contributed to the HOSPICE Program? Carol Dickenson, Community Services Manger, stated yes, it would be eligible for such a program. Martha Westcott, Executive Director of Kitsap Sexual Assault Center, noted their agency has been proposed to receive $2,100 of the $14,000 and she thanked Mayor Lobe, the Block Grant staff, committee and City Council for their consideration of this agency as it will offset the loss of funding they had this year. She noted the importance of services being given by their agency and the need to increase such services. Mr. Johnson questioned if the Fiscal recommended approval of this request? Chairman, stated yes. and Budget Committee had Mr. Overson, as Committee Mr. Waibel felt that funding for Flagship '89 was more appropriate for CDBG funding rather than General Fund and questioned if Flagship would be eligible to receive CDBG funding? Ms. Dickenson stated Flagship is a 501-C3 non-profit recognized agency and CDBG could consider contracting with them. Mrs. Horton requested an explanation why the Assault Center was identified for the additional funding. Ms. Dickenson stated when additional funds were identified the Block Grant Advisory Committee reviewed those agencies who applied for funding last fall and came back with a recommendation to fund Kitsap Assault Center $2,100 additional dollars because that agency had taken the largest cut in funding from the prior year (1988-1989). Mr. Johnson stated he supported the Committee's recommendation and pointed out that the HOSPICE Program had received some funding through 1989 Block Grant funds. M/S/C/U(Crutcher/Colvin) to approve the proposed 1989 Community Services budget adjustment to reflect the actual 1988 Block Grant carryover and increased 1989 Grant funding as approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 8A - PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED INTERIM PARKING PLAN, #AB89-087 The Interim Parking Plan outlines a comprehensive phased program TAPE #623 City Council Reg. Meeting Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 4 of 14 for on-street parking within the City including provisions for free retail parking; retail/business, employee, residential and commuter parking; and reconfiguration of parking rates and penalties. Other recommendations reflect the Parking Committee's input on timed parking, parking on planting strips, one-way streets, and establishment of a Parking Advisory Board. Christa Little, Treasurer's Department, thanked those citizens, both pro and con who have taken their time to make input to the City in regard to the Parking Plan as well as an active Parking Committee who have dedicated considerable time also providing input. The emphasis on the Parking Plan has been one toward improving the residential areas impacted by parking and to upgrade the City's treatment of parking generally, both in the downtown area for retail parking and for employee parking. The following areas reflect a change as a result of the process of taking citizen input on the proposed plan: 1. Improve Enforcement - it is suggested that functions be consolidated, including enforcement, so that communications can be improved with citizens and upgrade enforcement efforts. 2. Revising previous recommendation to reserve parking spots for commuters in highest impacted residential areas - the city now has technology to allow use of smaller zones and not assigning spaces. Residents were concerned that they were not being treated the same way, that commuters would have parking but they would not. There will be no signing or street painting in order to maintain a more residential appearance in the neighborhoods. 3. Recommendation that plan be implemented in a more "phase" basis - plan will be taken step-by-step. As a result, the financial projection has been reduced in the first year and it is estimated that there will be 1-3 potential commuter spaces actually used for commuter parking within the first year. 4. Provide a program that will allow a great deal more citizen involvement on on-going problems through the creation of a Parking Advisory Committee. Staff is recommending that the committee be chaired by a Council member along with citizens from areas which are impacted. And, to establish a network of volunteers to provide information to the Parking Advisory Committee and to the City itself in terms of what is happening in the residential areas with parking problems and suggestions for improvement. Ms. Little explained the process to be used in residential areas, including: allocating adequate parking space for all of the residents. This is the first priority of the plan and staff is recommending moving at a slow pace, finding out what residential needs are (street-by-street) and then allowing plenty of parking space for those residents. Then, they would allow additional space for guests and staff does have a recommended "guest parking" program. After the above has been accomplished, staff will look into whether or not there is space to provide commuter parking and only if there is some availability of space will they start the first phase of "residential commuter parking" plan. Ms. Little noted that throughout the process staff has requested recommendations, suggestions, i.e., alternatives and they have not received viable alternatives to this plan. Basically the things they wish to accomplish ~: (1) develop a funding source, other than the tax payers, to continue an enforcement program in the impacted neighborhoods; (2) to provide funding for operations of streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters in these neighborhoods- so that there can be a significant improvement in the residential area; (3) recommendations for free retail parking and TAPE #623 City Council Reg. Meeting Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 5 of 14 long term paid employee parking; (4) changes in violations and penalties and parking rates. The recommendation to do away with commuter parking in residential areas entirely was not considered a viable solution because of the fact there is a significant cost absorbed by the City as a whole for the Residential Parking Program. There will be a need to find a viable funding source outside the General Fund for that program. Ms. Little stated there are problems throughout the City relating to parking and she feels the proposed plan deals with those problems. She noted it was not a "fixed" plan but basically a framework that could be worked with to develop on a continuing basis of response to the citizens and to their needs as both residents, employees and business owners. Andrew Parypa, Parking Committee member, stated if the proposed plan is implemented and enforced along with existing ordinances it will give the streets back to the residents. He noted the first priority in the plan is to the resident and the second prior is to the resident's guest and any remaining space would be available for commuter parking...resident and guest would have free parking but commuters must pay. He stressed the importance of getting vehicles off planting strips and sidewalks and repairing those damages with funds other than from the residents, as well as enhancing the areas. He noted if the plan is not accepted the citizens can expect further deterioration of planning strips and sidewalks, possibly opening the City to very costly litigation. He urged the Council to implement the plan City-wide so that the community migration can be controlled. Joe Stark, Parking Committee member, spoke in favor of the proposed Parking Plan due to increased enforcement allowing residents more parking opportunities, repaired streets and sidewalks and he urged everyone to work together so the plan can be implemented slowly and effectively. Diane Stefanini, Parking Committee member, stated she joined the Parking Committee a long time ago when her street was proposed to be made one-way. At that time, the City decided it was necessary to look at Bremerton as a whole not just the Manette area. She stressed that the Parking Committee is made of individuals from all parts of the City and an important aspect of the proposed Parking Plan is the Citizens Advisory Committee, which would allow representation of the residents of the City. Wayne Estes, Parking Committee member, stated he felt the City was working its way in the right direction and the Parking Committee is about 1/2 way through their recommended proposal. He invited anyone interested in the issue of parking to join the Parking Committee which meets every Tuesday evening at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Conference Room. He noted Mrs. Horton is doing a terrific job as chairman of the committee. He looked forward to some type of traffic organization once the parking issue is being resolved. He announced the Committee will be taking a walking tour on Thursday, April 6, starting at 6th and Venita at 10:00 AM, and invited anyone interested to join them. He urged the City Council to keep the parking program going and the City will get a Parking Plan that will make sense. Paul Schmitt, Parking Committee member, stated he would be very happy to have parking enforcement in his neighborhood due to his being impacted with commuters who work at the Para facility. He pointed out that the property owners of Bremerton are paying for the wear and tear on streets, destruction to sidewalks and planting strips and treatment of stormwater that runs off into the sewer system, and also paying dearly in property values. TAPE #623 City Council Reg. Meeting Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 6 of 14 Bremerton is the only area in Kitsap County that has not seen an increase in its assessed value in the last two years. He noted the proposed plan is an "interim" plan and that if parking was not free there might be more "pay" parking lots. Phil Drouin, Parking Committee member, stated we have to live in the day of compromise and noted the revision in the plan - no rented space in residential areas. Mr. Drouin offered the following suggestions for further revision: (1) Page 2- Enforcement - question...will the Parking Regulators be under the Parking Manger? This needs to be clarified and he stated if the regulators remain under the Police Chief, through no fault of his own, the easiest things for him to cut from the budget, when a cut is required, is the parking regulators. (2) Page 4 - Parking Permits - Mr. Drouin questioned the fairness to those residents who have some type of parking on their property and their not being eligible for Parking Permits. He described a scenario of elderly women who preferred parking in front of their homes where they felt more safe when going to and from their vehicles. He felt the plan was discriminatory and each resident should have the equal opportunity for permits. (3) Ordinance relating to no parking of RV's or trailers on City streets - mention of this should be included in the Parking plan, which it does not at the present time, for enforcement purposes. (4) Page 5 - Use of Proceeds - question..will it be earmarked as stated on page 6 of the Plan or will it go into the General Fund? Mr. Drouin requested City Council to take his suggestions under advisement before making a final decision on the proposed plan. Ms. Little stated for clarification: residential permits in original proposal was that every household would receive one parking permit, if off-street parking were available they would not receive additional permits. However, if they did not have off street parking the resident could apply for a second permit and additional permits would be granted. In the "Interim" Plan proposal they have tried to be more flexible in the wording- basically saying if the residents owns five vehicles they could obtain 5 parking permits if there is no off-street parking available. We are concerned with the situation that people are selling off-street parking and it is not desired to open the area up entirely. Georue Stefanini, Parking Committee member, stated his primary concern for serving on the Parking Committee was to preserve the parking rights of the residents of the City. The proposed "Interim" plan protects the rights of the residents the right to park in front of or within their own block where they reside. He stated the proposed plan was a good opportunity for the members of the City Council to take a big step forward and get some action going toward the parking problems of Bremerton. George Allan, Parking Committee member, stated the plan is not perfect but it is something to work from. He strongly urged the Council to adopt the plan and he commended Mrs. Horton for the wonderful work she has accomplished in a short period of time. Richard Haves, Executive Director of Kitsap Transit, stated Kitsap Transit will do every thing they can to encourage commuters to use alternative transportation, such as bus service, car pooling, park & ride facilities, etc. The following individuals stated their opposition to the proposed "Interim" Parking Plan: Kal Leichtman, 205 High Street; Lena Swanson, 2123 Snyder; Russ Butler, 1240 8th Street; Donald Brittin, 1520 Elizabeth; Robert Baker, 2424 Snyder; Louis Mentor, 2669 Marine Drive; Wallis Simpson, President Olympic College; Dave Scott, 615 High Avenue; Del Knauss, 109 Olypic; Clarence Land, 145 S. Lafayette; Dale Magneson, 132 Bloomington Avenue; TAPE #623 City Council Reg. Meeting Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 7 of 14 Randy Brezler, 130 Olympic; Terry Surratt, 6353 Sunset Avenue NE; Lisa Wischhoefer, 779 Glenwood Rd.; Chuck Naper, 126 Olympic Avenue; David Lacross, College Student; Gene Canciglie, College Student; Doreen Scott, 615 High Avenue; Tom Swanson, 2123 Snyder Avenue; Art Anderson, 1712 Ohio; Tom, Daines, 207 S. Lafayette, Arthur Borders, 213 High Avenue; Carole Henry, 2208 Burwell Place; Dona Magneson, 132 Bloomington Avenue; Randy Jackson, 806 Broadway; Richard Connell, 131 Olympic; Curtis Allen, 2123 5th Street; Mary McC_u]n , 1722 Gregory Way; Earl Nelson, 313 Olympic; David Kilpatrick, 109 State Avenue; John Parker, 1411 13th Street, Dan Waldbillig, 1428 Burwell; Elizabeth Buell, 1722 High Avenue. The following comments were given by the above named individuals who opposed the Parking Plan: (1) litter and garbage left by commuters; (2) question - whether or not it is legal to charge for parking on State Highway route;(3) infringement on 5th Amendment by lowering property values in residential areas impacted by commuters; (4) discriminatory...3 out of 9 districts are affected by the plan; (5) objection to the manner public hearing is being held; (6) residents have stated previously they do not support the plan; (7) if the plan is approved a Referendum will be out on the street immediately; (8) object to creating position for Parking Manager and assistant; (9) PSNS has not taken care of commuter parking problem and State has not taken care of Olympic College parking problems; (10) spend $40,000 on computerized system to manage parking problems not to pay for additional staff; (11) did not like residential two hour parking limit which places burden on resident and visitors to move vehicles; (12) additional permits for those persons age 62 or older - felt this was discriminatory; (13) Citizen Advisory Committee - not clear how citizens complaints can be handled or resolved through this body; (14) make Citizen Advisory Board an Omnibus Board; (15) garbage problem not from commuters but from people who party at night; (16) do not spend $40,000 on Parking Manager - instead buy property and build parking lots; (17) Map included in plan difficult to read; (18) revenue projection overstated; (19) suggested Flagship '89's Plan - do not allow any long term parking by anyone but residents anywhere in the City; (20) let private business build parking lots; (21) citizens can act as enforcement - no need to hire $40,000 manager; (22) charge for Olympic College Parking - burden placed on students would be a financial hardship' (23) question - what is the real reason behind the proposed plan; (24) parking spaces in front of residents being used to subsidize downtown retail parking; (25) City can't manage City Garage how can it expect to manage this plan; (26) questioned Washington State Constitution rights; (27) why should City deliver parking permits to PSNS - let the people come down and purchase permits from City Hall like any other citizen; (28) post everything two hours or less for parking; (29) 1,051 signed petition from students and concerned people on Olympic College campus - opposed to charging parking fees on streets surrounding Olympic College (474 City residents) which would create financial hardship on students; (30) as student, denied right to attend Olympic College due to financial hardship added parking fees would create; (31) difficulty in selling a home where assigned commuter parking is designated; (32) if property value drops will City of Bremerton make up the difference; (33) will have to commute to Tacoma to attend Jr. College due to financial hardship; (34) leave Olympic College student parking the way it is; (35) service vehicles permits- cumbersome process obtain permits as plan now proposes; (36) concerned that plan came from Treasurer's Department and not from Engineering Department; (37) plan should be a ballot issue so the residents of Bremerton can decide if they want the plan or not; (38) how can the City charge commuters for what residents are already paying for through taxes; (39) enforce car pooling TAPE #623 City Council Reg. Meeting Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 8 of 14. instead of impacting plan into ordinances; of parking lots neighborhoods; (40) translate enforceable (41) change laws to allow easier building TAPE #624 Staff's response regarding comments given by those who oppose: Ian Sievers, City Attorney, stated he would look into the question relating to collecting fees for parking on State Highway routes. He saw no conflict on the equity issue...State Law gives the City Council that right. Ms. Little stated that litter and garbage concerns were a primary reason in developing the plan and if adopted the plan would provide more control of that issue. Ms. Little stated the Parking Manager position was identified to pull together functions that currently are being paid for through General Funds from various parts of City administration...not a new position just a consolidation of functions. On the two hour parking limit it is understood this is a problem area and effort will be made to work with the Advisory Board to come up with a solution that is responsive to the residents. President Hornin~ questioned the membership of the Advisory Committee? Ms. Little stated the Citizen Advisory committee would be chaired by a City Council member with representatives from the three most impacted residential districts along with three City staff who have knowledge related to parking - City Engineer, City Treasurer and Police Chief. The Parking Committee has recommended that the City Advisory Committee include representation from all City districts. Ms. Little stated there will be a "Guest Permit" process available for everyone no matter what their age. The part of the Plan relating to additional permits for 62 year old or older citizens was included in response to older citizens concerns as to difficulties encountered getting down to City Hall to obtain a permit. Mr. Waibel stated for clarification that the $40,000 shown for the Parking Manager position reflected the entire personnel cost, including benefits for that individual, therefore the base salary would be less than the $40,000. Ms. Little noted there is no intention to put meters in residential areas. And, she stated for clarification the process used in determining location of residents: (1) use of a plat map, taking measurements on every block and allowed parking for every resident including every unit (duplexes or apartments) allowing for curb cuts, driveways, fire hydrants, etc., providing guest parking and service parking then allocated a high average for all those concerns; (2) a net number was determined and that number was discounted by 35~ for contingency purposes; (3) then the first year projects were cut by approximately 1/2 that amount. She felt her predictions were conservative but they did not include, but it might be obtained, metered parking other than designated in the financial analysis. Ms. Little stated the reason the parking issue was looked at was at the request of the City council. The concerns have been to improve control of commuter traffic in residential areas to allow better control of litter and congestion problems; to provide a continuing stable revenue base to off set what is currently substantially subsidized cost for the City's current parking enforcement program in the residential area; to bring parking rates into line with the market rate; parking penalties to bring more in line with other cities are charging. TAPE #625 TAPE #623 City Council Rag. Meeting Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 9 of 14 Garage and parking lot - these are areas that are being looked into and recommendations will be made to the City Council later. The liability does not change from current status with the exception where planting strips are stipulated for parking with the City being responsible for both the surfacing and liability in those places where on-street parking cannot be utilized safely. Ms. Little stated the Parking Committee has asked Olympic College to work with them to help deal with the concerns the student body has. She noted they are looking forward to working with the college and Kitsap Transit to address those concerns. Ms. Little stated the "interim" plan is not proposing reserved plan. Great care will be given in determining where allowable commuter parking is available in the residential areas so as to have the least impact on residents. President Hornin~ noted the City has contacted Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Olympic College and all of the appropriate legislators regarding parking concerns, unfortunately they are not addressing the problem and it is back in the hands of the City to resolve. Ms. Little stated there will be multiple guest space set aside- as many spaces are needed for any particular block. Also, there has been developed a proposal for free retail parking in the downtown and Callow area. Ms. Little explained the provisions made for service permits would allow people who have multiple days on a job to get permits for as many days as they require. Ian Slavers stated, in regard to charging for parking on street, the State allows ~ees to be charged for on street parking as a means of regulating a scarce resource and they do regulate how those revenues can be spent so the funds are earmarked to go back into parking administration and parking development. Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk, read letters into the record from the following individuals: Cheryl Matson, Hewitt Avenue, opposing charging for parking in the Olympic College Area and felt the public should decide if they want a Parking Plan through a ballot issue; Myrtle Macklehaney, 100 N. Lafayette, opposed to parking Plan due to increased traffic problems, hardship on guests or family visiting their residence; Leo Woercher, Gregory Way, opposing Parking Plan; Richard and Ina Merchon, opposed to Parking Plan due to its giving preference to commuter parking not to residents and their guests; Philip Washington, 147 S. Montgomery, opposing the parking plan but welcomed any help the City could give to open up parking in front of our near his home; Norma Olmstead, 2136 Fifth Street, opposed to Parking Plan because of (1) limit of parking permits for residents, allowing commuter parking would add congestion to street, problem for guest parking; Mr. Collins stated he had received 29 letters opposing the Parking Plan and requested that the names and addresses be entered into the record: Wallace A. Simpson, President Olympic Collete; Norma J. Olmstead, 2136 Fifth Street; Robert R. Olmstead, 2136 Fifth Street; Earl Nelson, 313 Olympic; Mr. & Mrs. Victor Scott, 1529 Naval Avenue; M. L. Loth, 1551 Snyder; J. F. McDonald, 2206 Burwell Place; Mildred L. Crossman, 1339 Ivy Road; Mrs. Hazel Morrissay, 307 S. Lafayette;Mrs. Marjan E. McCuin, 1722 Gregory Way; Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Jansen, 147 Olympic Avenue; Marilyn Alcantor, 2136 Fifth Street; Dorothy Morrison Kiss, 204 #1699 #1857 TAPE #624 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 10 of 14 S. Marion Avenue; Ed Schroeder, 1736 Gregory Way, Mr. & Mrs. Harry D. Schroeder, 1736 Gregory Way; Mrs. Dorothy Hutchins, 141 S. Summit; Mr. & Mrs. Leo Brott, 503 Olympic Avenue; Lee Eagleton, 304 Olympic P1.; John Black, 117 South Wycoff; Mr. & Mrs. William T. Clark; Mr. & Mrs. James Hanson; Philip Washington, 147 S. Montgomery. Mr. Collins presented a petition to the City council which contained 659 names of individuals who are opposed to the parking Ms. McCluskey, City Clerk, read into the record a letter from Mayor Gene Lobe in which he urged the City Council to address the issue of parking and to approve the plan as modified. Mrs. Horton pointed out commuter parking in residential areas is only one component of the proposed plan. She pointed out the need to increase parking penalties, to look at impounding repeat violators and addressing downtown employee/retail parking problem. Therefore, she suggested a modification to the "Interim" Plan which included adopting all of the portions of the plan excluding commuters in residential areas. However, she would like to select a target area in one of the non-2-hour zones to implement this plan for a trial run of 2-3 months. Mr. Crutcher stated parking problems cannot be solved with the proposed plan and he supported the suggestions made by Mr. Louis Mentor - to restrict all commuter parking and require that they park in private lots. Mr. Johnson stated he felt the Olympic College students had a valid complaint about parking, however, he felt they should be complaining to the legislators not the City. He noted he had some problems with the revenue allocation and felt it was a non- negotiable issue~ In regard to the Citizen Advisory Committee, he suggested the possibility of rotating citizens membership on a two years basis between some of the other districts. Mr. Johnson questioned if the proposed plan was more of a policy document not a detailed implementation plan? Mr. Sievers stated this would not provide a method of implementation by just passing a motion to adopt the plan - what is needed is to pass a motion directing staff to come back with ordinances and resolutions to implement all or some of the elements of the plan. Mr. Colvin questioned the legality of charging commuters for parking? Mr. Sievers stated yes, it is very common to set a priority favoring residential property owners where there is a heavy impact on the users, such as large industry, complex, not only in this state but other states. Mr. Colvin suggested that the City should review the plan proposed by Flagship '89 and compare it with what is being proposed at this time. Also, Mr. Colvin supported leaving Olympic College parking as is. Mr. Collins briefly reviewed the petition he presented which contained 659 signatures opposing the proposed plan - noting the percentages of different districts. He stated he felt staff did what they were told to do, however, he felt it was poorly completed, subject to change at will and suggested that it was just the beginning to be further developed before Council voted on a definite plan. M/S/C/U(Waibel/Colvin) to approve the implementation of the following portions of the plan: Setting Of Parking Rates, Setting Of Parking Violation Penalties, Establishment Of A Parking Advisory Board, Prohibition Of Parking On Planting Strips, Designation Of One-Way Streets, Retail/Business Parking Areas, M/S/C(Waibel/Johnson) that the City Council direct staff to prepare a plan for developing a test area in a residential area TAPE #625 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 11 of 14 that is designated by the Parking Advisory Committee, all of the required ordinances for that test area. to develop Vote: In Favor: Opposed: Johnson, Dawkins, Horning, Waibel, Horton, Overson Collins, Colvin, Crutcher 6B - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - BREMERTON MAIN STREET ASSOCIATION, #AB89-067 The City Budget includes $15,000 for services delivered to the City by the Bremerton Main Street Association. Council Statements Of Legislative Intent (1989) address the need for a clearer contractual relationship with the Bremerton Main Street Association. The proposed contract identifies both general promotional activities on behalf of the City and quantifiable work products to be produced by the Bremerton Main Street Association. Don Pratt, Director Community Development, stated the work products identified are quantifiable and of assistance in providing an economic indicator as to what is happening downtown and also helpful in analyzing what's happening and developing policies and plans to deal with them. In addition, Item F requires a report and recommendation from the Main Street Board to the Mayor on business improvement area by a set date. Ian Sievers, City Attorney, stated this item had been tabled for two weeks and some revision of the contract did take place since that time: (1) under Scope - change wording to read "Consultant shall present written reports as required by Exhibit A to the City Council following each quarter .... "; (2) under Termination- change it to read: "This agreement may be terminated by either party for convenience upon thirty (30) days written notice...". Don Atkinson, Bremerton Main Street Association, provided a brief synopsis of the past years activities and present thrust which includes: (1) cooperative effort and support to the City of Bremerton and to the overall Flagship concept, working with the Chamber Of Commerce and some other agencies of the City who are vitally concerned with the revitalization of the central business district; (2) protracted negations with Mr. Pratt and Mr. Sievers lining out some specific duties for Main Street and working with the City and other entities - making it a task oriented contract; (3) will be working with Olympic College on a marketing issue to assist in the research portion of the contract which is to be attempted in a timely fashion and brought in the form of a document that will be of assistance to the Planning staff and the City in general. Mr. Johnson suggested that each City Council member receives copies of Main Street Reports and questioned, under Exhibit A (a) - Building Utilization Inventory, who will be doing the work? Mr. Atkins stated Main Street would be responsible for the report with assistance from the Marketing class at Olympic College. Mr. Pratt stated he is the contract administrator on behalf of the City so the reports will be directed to him. The intent is to have a report developed, there are some unknowns and there is not enough money in the contract to provide all of the leg work to get the report written. It is felt that a portion of the work can be done through volunteers and the College but it can't be assumed, in the contract, that the work will be forthcoming. All that is being asked is that a report or status report be provided by Main Street, who will be coordinating the effort to get it started. If Main Street comes back stating the TAPE #625 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 12 of 14 work cannot be completed due to some valid reasons, then the City will have to accept the fact it could not be completed. Mr. Johnson stated he disagreed and the purpose of the contract was to establish a deliverable and if for some reason they cannot make it then they would request a change in the contract. Mr. Pratt stated the proposal is for the $15,000 contract to have Main Street initiate this contract and report back. The Mayor and administration believes that to ask them to provide the report and the other work that they have done for $15,000 was more than they were funded for. Mr. Johnson stated maybe that item should be deleted if it turns out to be non-deliverable. Mr. Pratt disagreed, in that they think it is important that someone take the responsibility for trying to get the report completed and Main Street has agreed to take that responsibility for being the coordinator - whether or not it can be accomplished will be up to them to tell the City. Mrs. Horton noted she had a problem with Item G - report on sources and revenue received in the categories of public funds. She stated Main Street is being treated as a consultant, as is Flagship - that was not required for Flagship. Mr. Pratt stated the Mayor's initial understanding of funding for Main Street was granted with a significant public promise or goal to achieve funding on a 1/3 City, 1/3 tenants and 1/3 property owners. The Mayor assumes that this situation is still in place and he believes it is a political necessity that it be monitored to see if that agreement is still in effect. Mrs. Horton disagreed with that position and stated if the City receives a final report and a financial statement showing the 1/3 breakdown that should be adequate. Mr. Overson pointed for a number of years Main Street was funded with no specific action identified or required. Mr. Atkinson stated, on point G, he resisted it when it came out in the contract as he feels an effort is set out to have it both ways - to line out the chores and demanding the levels of participation for funding be maintained. The implied threat of the possibility of funding be pulled is evident through this item. Main Street is willing to adhere to the points that are included and perform the contract as stated. However, if the funding level slips with further decline of the downtown area is the implied threat then that they are not achieving the contract? Mr. Johnson noted the big difference in the past when Main Street was funded through Block Grant funds. And, any time the City funds anything out of the General Fund it should be monitored carefully. Also, when Main Street was first established City's funding was to last a few years and it was to become self- sustaining. Mr. Atkins reported he artended a Main Street Conference, which was held in Olympia last month, and at that meeting it was noted when Main Street was initiated in many communities it was initiated with the expectation that there was a primary three-year commitment, just as it was in Bremerton. Since that time they have re-evaluated this and have said it is an on-going program and there is no magic in the 3-year formula previously used. #2349 M/S/C/U(Waibel/Collins) to authorize Mayor Lobe to sign the contract between the City of Bremerton and Bremerton Main Street Association. #2858 M/S/C/U(Horton/Crutcher) made an amendment eliminate Item #G from the contract. to the motion to Vote on original motion: Unanimous Yes to approve. TAPE #626 6C - GRANT ACCEPTANCE - BOATING SAFETY PROGRAM, #AB89-081 On September 21, 1988, the City Council approved application for a Boating Safety Grant. The grant is in the amount of $10,160. #0053 #0129 TAPE #625 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 13 of 14 The City will provide matching funds through in-kind services in the amount of $10,840. The State Parks Commission has approved the City's Grant Application and Council acceptance of the grant is requested. Arvilla Ohlde, Parks & Recreation Director, noted there was a delay in getting the grant to the City and the State has extended it until March 31, 1989, at the City's request. M/S/C/U(Colvin/Horton) to accept State Parks Cooperative Boating Safety Grant and authorize Mayor Lobe to sign. 6D - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT BROKER- CORROON & BLACK, INC., #AB89-082 In order to control the rising costs of the City's employee benefit programs, the City solicited proposals for benefit broker services in January, 1989. Proposals from three firms were received and representatives from each were interviewed. The interview panel has determined that Corroon & Black, Inc., would provide the best and most cost effective service to the City. The proposed agreement requires Corroon & Black to review existing City plans, assist with plan design, market the selected plans, negotiate terms and conditionals and install the selected plans for a maximum fee of $8,000. The agreement also provides the City with the option of obtaining additional broker services at a fee not to exceed $14,000 in total. At the conclusion of the first phase, a recommendation will be brought to Council regarding extension of the contract for continuing Broker Services as listed in Addendum "A". Mr. Waibel questioned if a "broker's fee" was included in the proposed contract amount and if it was he suggested eliminating it or to modify it to be included in the amount quoted? Kathleen McCluskey, City Clerk, stated the intent of the contract is a flat fee and specifically no commission in the rate and if it is not included in the contract it will be added in. M/S/C/U(Waibel/Crutcher) to approve Professional Services Agreement with Corroon & Black, Inc. 6E - FIRE DEPARTMENT REOUEST TO PURCHASE SIX NEW VEHICLES AND SURPLUS NINE VEHICLES, #AB89-083 The Fire Department is requesting purchase of vehicles through the State bid process. The Fire Department needs five automobiles for emergency duties and prefers to use the same vehicles as obtained by the Bremerton Police Department for emergency duties. In addition, the Fire Department needs one mini-van instead of an automobile for non-emergency duties in the Fire Prevention Bureau. This change is necessary to avoid further damage to equipment that is taken apart in order to squeeze into the rear of an automobile when it is better transported in the cargo area of a mini-van. The Fire Department will need six radios and related emergency lights of these six new vehicles. The Fire Department is requesting six vehicles. disposing of seven automobiles and Leonard Marks, Fire Chief, stated the City has a Vehicle Depreciation Reserve Fund and the requested vehicles are fully funded through that source. This is a routine replacement process - the current vehicles are 8 1/2 years old and at the end of their useful life as emergency vehicles. The Fire Department also has two 30 year old pumpera that are beyond repair. In #0549 #0619 TAPE #626 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 5, 1989 Page 14 of 14 addition, when the City purchased two new ambulances the department promised to get rid of the 1976 ambulance when the other vehicles were disposed so that vehicle is included in the request to surplus. In addition, the 1979 Pontiac that they surplused last year but had not replaced was scrapped for metal and now needs to be replaced. It is Chief Marks' recommendation that all new vehicles be purchased (same model/heavy duty type) so that they can be run depreciatively and safely for the next 10 years. President Hornina requested Chief Marks to notify local auto dealers of the proposal to purchase vehicles so that they may also made a bid. Chief Marks stated he acknowledged that request and will proceed as soon as possible. Mr. Johnson stated he did not remember purchasing Fire Department vehicles as a big budget issue. And, why do the Fire Department need as heavy duty vehicles as the Police Department? Chief Marks stated the Police Department replace their vehicles more frequently than the Fire Department and the wear and tear on a vehicle over time is reflected in the adequacy of the size of frame, tires, etc., so a heavy duty vehicle should be purchased in the beginning so they will last for 10 years. M/S/C(Waibel/Dawkins) to approve the purchase of the six requested vehicles and to declare surplus the following vehicles: Vehicles Nos. 430, 431, 433, 434, 435, 437, E5, E6 and R1 and direct that they be disposed of in the best interest of the City. Vote: In Favor: Opposed: Overson, Crutcher, Horton, Horning, Waibel, Collins, Dawkins, Colvin Johnson M/S/C(Johnson/Colvin) one week. motion to table all unfinished items for Vote: In Favor: Opposed: Johnson, Colvin, Dawkins, Collins, Horton, Crutcher, Waibel Overson, Horning With no further business meeting adjourned at 10:42 p.m. ~ ~ ~ ' '~ KATHLEEN L. MCCLUSKEY, CLERK CITY APPROVED 1 D File/Vault