Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/31/91TAPE #941 UNAPPROVED DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 31, 1991 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4TH Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, July 31, 1991, at 5:30 p.m., with Council President Lynn Horton presiding. Council members present: Lon Overson, Wayne Estes, Spencer Horning, Hank Waibel, C. R. "Tiny" Collins, Morrie Dawkins, A1 Colvin and Russ Johnson. ~Also present were City Attorney Ian Sievers and Deputy City Clerk Gil Johnson. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by President Lynn Horton and the Invocation given by Reverend Clayton Bonar of the First Church Of The Nazarene. CONSENT AGENDA - None #0029 CLAIMS/WARRANT REGISTERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24,080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24,090, have been recorded on a listing that has been made available to the council. M/S/C/U(Colvin/Dawkins) on July 31, 1991, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 13217 through 13221 and 133395 through 133767 in the total amount of $873,332.50 and Retirees Payroll for the period ending July 31, 1991, in the total amount of $54,169.27. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS Mr. Johnson reported he recently learned about "soybean biodegradable ink" and questioned whether or not our local newspaper was using such a product. Today he discovered that The Sun had been using this product for a decade. In an international recycling bulletin he also learned that a recycling firm in Germany studied plastic packaging and what would be the affect on our economy if plastic packaging was not used. The result of that study was: (1) packages would weigh 404% more; (2) volume of waste would go up 256%; (3) 201% more energy to produce other packaging products; (4) cost of packaging would more than double 212%. The next step that needs further development is how to reuse the plastic packaging that we already have. Another area of concern was the fact that the Federal Government was putting stringent deadlines on stormwater permits. These deadlines are coming up very fast to meet the Federal requirement on "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems". Another area that will need close monitoring is the Growth Management Act, particularly in the amendments adopted this year. Many of those amendments affect TAPE #941 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 2 of 18 issues that are current in Bremerton. The Association Of Washington Cities will be holding hearings throughout the State in order to educate governmental jurisdictions on the new mandates. He quoted from one segment of the summary provided by the State: "The State must compile a list of essential State facilities in need of location within the next six years. All local governments planning under the Act must have a process for identifying and siting of these essential public facilities and no local Comprehensive Plan or development regulation may preclude siting these and other essential public facilities, such as airports, State education facilities, State or regional transportation facilities, and state and local correction facilities, solid waste handling facilities and inpatient facilities include substance abuse, mental health and group homes". Mr. Colvin reported he received a call from Randy Turner complaining about raccoons. He thanked the Street Department for their quick response to the concerns of some senior citizens. He pointed out it appears the Mayor had started his citizen input program. Mr. Dawkins reported he had the honor of leading the Bremerton Central Lions Club in the Silverdale Whaling Days Parade. He commended the local communities in the County on their street fairs and parades. Mr. Overson stated there is lots going on and suggested people walk around and see the changes taking place in the downtown area. Mr. Estes announced on Friday, August 2, 11:00 AM, at Ivy Green Cemetery the dedication of the Saratoga Monument will take place. He encouraged everyone to attend this ceremony. In September he will be coordinating another tour of the Pre-release Facility in Tacoma and extended an invitation to the three Bremerton elected officials who had refused to visit the site. He believed Kitsap County could one day end up with a full scale prison if the Pre- release Facility location is rejected. Regarding the proposal to change the form of City government, he reminded everyone that their group was following the democratic process and the education portion will be started soon. He stated he would challenge each of his opponents in the elected body to a debate some time in the future. In reference to the Mayor's new survey conducted through Utility billing, he felt it was a real tragedy. Utility billings do go out to people living in the County and not everyone who actually lives in Bremerton will receive such a billing, i.e., apartment building residents. He felt the questions were weighted to bring a certain type of response, therefore, the responses would not be valid. He did not feel it was appropriate to use the Utility Department personnel to carry out this function and only added costs to the water/sewer bills. It was his opinion and the TAPE #941 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 3 of 18 opinion of others he had talked with that the questions were poorly written. He hoped the questionnaire would be terminated and more thought given to it in the future. In reference to the new entrance into Bremerton, he questioned what was happening to the idea of mass transit and/or park and ride lots which would decrease the number of vehicles on city streets? Mr. Morning stated he had received a number of calls on the questionnaire issue supporting Mr. Estes position. One of the questions he was asked was would the property managers, who get 40- 50 water billings, get to turn in that many responses to the questionnaire? Today he had the opportunity to ride aboard the USS Missouri from Indian Island to Seattle and Seafair. It was a marvelous trip and he looked forward to the day when the USS Missouri would be back in Bremerton as a decommissioned ship and again a tourist attraction. He thanked Dave Borcharding, who coordinated this event locally, Navy League, Sailors and Captain of the Mighty Missouri for a wonderful trip. Mr. Waibel announced the Japanese exchange students from Kure, Japan arrived on Tuesday and will soon visit the City Council. Mrs. Morton thanked the Street Department and Utility Department for their quick response to a problem on Naval Avenue. She announced that problem could not be totally repaired until a replacement part is secured, but the problem will be solves as soon as possible. PUBLIC RECOGNITION Mayor Louis Mentor reported some of his activities this past week included: attending a fund raising event for Hospice on Friday evening, participated in a Fun Walk/Run on Saturday, attended a "Chinese Celebration" on Saturday evening. He reminded everyone of the USS Saratoga Memorial Service scheduled for Friday, August 2, 11:00 AM; and on Saturday, August 3, 10:00 AM at the viewing platform there will be a special memorial service for the USS Shoobrick. In reference to street banners, he explained that work is underway to stabilize the banners so they will hang properly in the wind. He also reminded everyone of the "Concert On The Dock" on Thursday, 6:00 P.M. In reference to the questionnaire, he felt many people were missing the point of its purpose. The questionnaire will not be a scientific poll but as the Mayor of the City he wanted input from the citizens on important issues that are being considered. He stated he was interested in hearing what people think who live outside the City. He hoped City Council members would come up with questions to include in the survey. Richard Chrisinger encouraged everyone to attend the USS Saratoga Memorial Ceremony on Friday, August 2. He distributed copies of the history of the USS Saratoga and what happened to that ship in TAPE #941 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 4 of 18 1945. Police Chief De1 McNeal introduced Officer Steve Emm. Steve Emm, Crime Prevention Officer, presented a special Recognition Award to Ron Kerns, who volunteered in excess of 500 hours towards the D.A.R.E. Program and Crime Prevention activities. Officer Emmalso acknowledge Sandy Marshall for her volunteer services to the Program and Ed Arnold, who recently had to leave the program. Mayor Mentor presented Ron with a plaque and read a letter of acknowledgement and appreciation for 12 months of dedicated volunteer service in the Crime Prevention Division. Ron Kerns thanked everyone for the award. Vickie Loft, member of the Citizens Advisory Committee for Sinclair and Dyes Inlet, announced their group is planning an event for Saturday, September 21, 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM, to be held at the Central Branch of the Kitsap Regional Library, as part of the Washington Coast Weeks celebration. Anyone wishing more information may contact the Central Branch Library. Don Atkinson, Bremerton Main Street Association, announced on August 15 there will be the dedication of two million dollars worth of building modernization downtown with a 5:00 P.M. presentation at 4th and Pacific. Following that ceremony, there will be a social held at Hudson Photography, a Concert on the Dock, Bremerton Sunday Farmers Market on 4th Street between Pacific and Washington Avenue from 6:00 P.M. until 9:00 P.M., as well as a Gallery Walk. He invited everyone to attend this fun filled event. 6A - SOLID WASTE RATE INCREASE, #AB91-198 On October 1, 1991, rates at Olympic View Landfill will increase from $7.05 per cubic yard to $15.55 for compacted material. This includes an increase for both Olympic View and Kitsap County. This briefing is designed to cover solid waste issues in Kitsap County and the basis for the rate increase. The role of recycling, precycling, yard waste composting will be covered. Mary McClure, consultant to Kitsap County Sanitary Landfill, Inc., who owns Olympic View Sanitary Landfill, provided briefings on the following topics: 1. Nationwide trends in solid waste a. Population Pressure (no more room at landfills) b. Environmental protection c. High cost d. Long Range Planning e. Public Rejection a. Incineration b. Cost Increases 2. Responses/Strategies Nationwide TAPE #941 = City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 5 of 18 Decrease Waste stream precycling recycling composting packaging pricing Material Recovery Facilities Alternatives to Landfill Disposal waste - energy technology Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) Kitsap County Trash a. Collection areas b. Disposal sites 4. Kitsap landfill Capacities 5. Kitsap County Programs and Strategies 6. Proposed Rates/Tipping Fees 7. Conversion To Weight-Based Fee Structure 8. Rate Comparison: Tipping Fees/Ton 9. user Impacts 10. KCSL, Inc. Cost Breakdown $20.05 Million 11. Kitsap County Solid Waste Program: $3.95 Million (1991-1993 Rate Period) Bertv Buell, High Avenue, related the difficulty for senior citizens to dispose of garbage/yard waste/old tires, etc., and questioned if some type of pick up program could be implemented? Don Larson, Rainier Avenue, questioned if any thing could be done with yard waste to be reused on park areas? Jack Swanson, reporter from The Sun, requested Council President to summarize the nature of the negotiations underway with Brem-Air Inc., i.e., how are they going, term of contract, etc. Mr. Johnson stated in response to the question about contract negotiations, a public hearing on solid waste services for the City of Bremerton will be held on August 21. At that time, citizens will be asked to give their input as to service needs. And, with regard to how negotiations are going now...the City has been talking with Brem- Air Disposal, Inc., for a number of months and in his opinion being done in a very professional manner. In regard to what will garbage TAPE #941 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 6 of 18 service cost under the new contract, he felt it would be something less than what those living on the east side of Puget Sound are paying. Richard Chrisingerquestioned when the new recycle paper producing plants would be coming on line to take the burden off shipping the recycled paper to Oregon or overseas? Also, he reported that VFW Post 3694 recycled (for a 2-year period) over 1 million pounds of newspapers. Annie Bringloe, Solid Waste Division of Kitsap County, stated she shared Mr. Johnson's concerns over plastics and had been looking for a plastics processor for Kitsap County. The County and all the cities within the County are at a point in time where all of the solid waste and recycling management is changing. They are finishing their draft Comprehensive Plan, which should be available to the public on August 25, and much of the work Bremerton's Solid Waste Advisory Committee is doing will be included in the Plan. Some of the items in the questions raised will appear in the Plan. There will be a County sponsored "Backyard Composting Program", including education, assistance, availability of inexpensive composting bins. They will assist the Parks Districts on how to handle their generated waste on site. Other yard waste plans include the Yard Waste Composting Facility at the landfill site. There are many successful composting programs already implemented throughout Puget Sound. Ms. Bringloe anticipates starting out with yard waste drop areas and the Curbside Yard Waste Program coming later, possibly in one year. The curbside yard waste collection will probably be in the same areas that have curbside recycling pick up. Yard waste, in Kitsap County, is somewhere between 10 and 20 percent of the waste stream. Kitsap County is supposed to recycle 50% of the mixed municipal solid waste by 1995. She anticipates being able to recycle 38% without hurting too much, but effort must be made to reach 50%. The Department Of Ecology will be monitoring activities in local efforts to reach the 50% goal. Tire recycling is a real problem state-wide. The County is looking into providing some type of tire recycling service as well as the service they provide at KCSL. She is not aware of any curb side tire collection programs, however, this may be something that could be done on an annual basis. Newspaper recycling - she complimented any service organizations who stuck through collecting newspapers in this time when they were worth almost nothing. The Longview Plant for making recycled paper has started up, however, they obtained newspaper supplier contracts from California and Oregon. There will be new plants built in Port Angeles, eastern Washington and British Columbia for de-inking paper. She noted within a very short time the price for used newspaper should be going up. Mr. Collins questioned if Ms. McCLure was an employee of Olympic Landfill or Kitsap County? Ms. McClure stated neither, she is an TAPE #941 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 7 of 18 independent consultant and owner of McClure Research Company and is under contract to Parametrix, who are consulting engineers to KCSL, to handle the public information portion of this project. Mr.. Collins expressed concern over the 4 millions dollars that would go toward County costs. Ms. McClure explained Kitsap County will be collecting approximately 15% of the tipping fee. Kitsap County will be collecting $2.85 for every compacted cubic yard and $1.35 for every loose cubic yard. Those funds will go into their 27 month budget of basically 4 million dollars along with grant money and leasing funds. That would be separate from KCSL's 20 million dollars - this would be generated by some outside private funding for site improvements and $6.55 - $12.70 per compacted cubic yard and $8.65 per loose yard. Mr. Collins questioned if the 20 million dollars would go into the profit column of Olympic Landfill? Ms. McClure explained of that 20 million dollars 7% would be generated toward the profit margin (as authorized by the Washington Utility & Transportation Commission's profit margin maximum). Mr. Collins questioned if KCSL was receiving the full 7% profit margin or were there things eating into that percentage of profit? Pat Allan, Parametrix, stated they projected a 7% profit margin based on a projected waste stream and cost of facility improvements. If the cost of operating the landfill increase of what they projected and assumed, then the profit could go down. He doubted that profit margin would be going upward due to stringent regulations they are having to meet. Mr. Collins pointed out someone is putting these requirements on KCSL and therefore would this then be a tax? Mr. Allan explained the State of Washington dictated through new regulations that many environmental protection measures be taken and to implement those measures costs money and are derived from the user fees. Mr. Estes questioned the rate of decomposition and predicted life span of a landfill? Ms. McClure stated experts have stated there is not much settling rate involved once it has been handled/expands and compacted. Mr. Estes questioned. why couldn't some of the waste products be separated before going into the landfill? Ms. McClure explained that was the purpose of the Material Recovery facilities and she believed SWAC was talking about the development of such a facility in this region. Pat Allan stated when garbage is placed in the landfill it is compacted by machines and they assume certain density once compacted, but they also design into the landfill and calculate in terms of landfill life cycle, assuming materials will continue to settle over a period of time. Generally, they assume 20-30% settlement, although some places have gotten up to 50% settlement. Mr. Morning emphasized just because the tipping fee may double did not mean the resident cost would double. This was one ingredient in how costs for residential pick up is calculated. If more effort can be made in the areas of recycling and keep the labor costs TAPE #941 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 8 of 18 within the homes then the cost of collection would be held down, which would also affect the rates. People can made a difference at their home by helping to reduce the waste stream into the landfill. Ms. MoOlure stated Mr. Horning was correct, the outcome of this proposal for the customer will be different in each city and County, depending on the negotiated contracts. She pointed out there would only be about a 50% increase at transfer stations because of other handling methods. TAPE #942 Mr. Overson questioned what percentage of the solid waste delivered to Olympic Landfill comes from outside Kitsap County? Annie Bringloe stated 2%. Mr. Overson requested some backup data that would demonstrate that 2%. He questioned how could he, as a citizen, feel comfortable that no more than 2% of outside solid waste is being placed in the landfill? Ms. Bringloe stated one of the jobs of the County is being "bean counters" and required by the Department Of Ecology. Therefore, they have developed an elaborate program for monitoring as they develop their Comprehensive Plan. This information will appear in the Comprehensive Plan. President Morton questioned if we go to cubic measure verses weight, what will prevent people from buying a compactor and compacting all their waste? Ms. Brin~loe stated the price of trash compactors would probably stop them from doing that. Mr. Johnson stated it was his feeling that both the hauler and the City would like to go to "weight", however, there are problems to overcome. Ms. Bringloe noted the City of Seattle is developing a weight based collection program and Kitsap County will be watching to see how that program works and determine whether or not it would be economical to implement in this County. Mr. Johnson emphasized the cooperative effort between the City and Kitsap County Solid Waste Division, the Department of Ecology and the State Utility and Transportation Commission. Mr. Colvin questioned what will the consumer expect to pay when this tipping fee increase goes into effect? Mr. MoClure stated the rates will not double and the exact impact will be determined by the negotiations between Bremerton's Solid Waste Advisory Committee and Brem-Air Disposal, Inc. The impact will be well within 50% and hopefully less. Mr. Morning explained the Council of Governments dealt with an issue relating to dumping of construction debris in the landfill. This item brought out much comment from the public. From those discussion at the Regional Council, it was learned that the controls desired on the landfill had already been taken in hand by the State. TAPE #942 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 9 of 18 President Morton stated in order to make recycling lucrative, she encouraged everyone to look for the recycled label when purchasing products. Markets can be generated if the public supports them by buying recycled products. 6B - UPDATE ON PROPOSED GOLD MOUNTAIN GOLF COURSE EXPANSION, #AB91- 195 For the past several weeks the City Treasurer, Head Golf Professional and the Director Of Parks and Recreation, along with other support staff, have compiled extensive information regarding potential expansion alternatives at Gold Mountain Golf Course. Included in the discussion tonight will be a summary of that information, and an explanation of staff's intent to (1) secure a consultant who will provide further financial feasibility documentation, and (2) to solicit Statements Of Qualifications from architect and engineering firms for the design of the proposed expansion. Vicki Vanneman, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated as a result of the previous Study Session on this issue there appeared to be three extensional alternatives to be considered: (1) building a maintenance facility only; (2) designing for an 18 hole expansion and only building nine; (3) designing 18 holes and building 18. It appears, after reviewing the spread sheets and looking at the numbers developed by the City Treasurer that the third alternative to design and build 18 holes at this point made the most sense. She noted this was an exciting opportunity for her staff, the golf course staff and the community. Because she felt it was prudent to solicit some assistance from a consulting firm to provide further financial feasibility information, staff had completed a great deal of the leg work, which should reduce the cost of such a study. She believed this study could be done for an amount significantly less than $5,000. Contact had been made with two consulting firms, since the past Study Session, and proposals requested from each one. The types of services these firms offer include: market demand analysis, review of financial projections, financial operating estimates and financing guidelines. The design phase of a major project is very lengthy and in order to expedite the process she proposed they begin to solicit information for feasibility but at the same time go ahead and solicit requests for qualifications from design firms to do the design work for the proposed expansion. If the feasibility information looks good and everyone is in agreement to proceed, the design firm will be nearly selected at that time. Public comment - none. TAPE #942 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 10 of 18 Mr. Estes questioned why can't some of the initial work be done out of cash receipts, such as land clearing, etc.? Ms. Vanneman stated they did not want to "jump the gun" until they were certain of the design. They feel a 6-8 week delay to obtain a very clear, objective opinion about financial feasibility of the project would be worthwhile. Mr. Estes questioned what about starting after that 6-8 week period and pointed out the need to get the stumps out so the land could settle? Ms. Vanneman stated they may be ready to do that. Mr. Colvin questioned if the survey of out-of-town golfers was being continued? Ms. Vanneman stated that information had been collected since January 1, 1991, per Council's direction. At the last Golf Course Board of Director's meeting they discussed continuing that practice and it was learned that it tended to slow movement of business through the Pro Shop. The Board Of Directors made the decision to discontinue the survey, total the numbers and review the data. 7A - BREMERTON - KITSAP COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1991 BUDGET INCREASE, #AB91-181 The Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District Board recently approved a revised 1991 budget, which included an increase of $160,000. Bremerton's share of that increase is $29,600. There are three options available: 1. Do not approve the increase in which case services to Bremerton will be cut commensurate to our share (this may be difficult for the Health District to achieve). 2. Agree to the increase but pay in 1992 (we will then be faced in all probability with $30,000 for 1991 and $30,000 for 1992). 3. Agree to the increase and pay as soon as possible. Note: Fiscal and Budget Committee discussed this item at their July 3 meeting. Dr. Willa Fisher, Health District Officer, stated she and Elaine Massara, District Business Manager, would do their best to answer any questions that might arise. She provided copies of their new brochure listing their services and a copy of the revised budget. Dr. Fisher briefly reviewed recent action by the Health District Board to increase their 1991 budget. She noted this was a very unusual situation and the first time that it had happened in her 15 years as director. She was proud of the District's fiscal management and had always had a perfect report from the State Auditors. Several things happened in October 1990, that made it difficult to develop accurate budget projections. At that time, they were TAPE #942 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 11 of 18 impacted by increases in health insurance and benefits, they did not have an accurate projection of the C.P.I. that would go into effect in January 1991, and the IRS increased the mileage rate in January 1991. These were all things that impacted them all at once which they had not projected. Also, in 1990, they were implementing the First Steps Program (State Pre-natal Care Program for pregnant women), and were adding nursing staff to provide services for the low income women eligible for the program. Another impact was the Medicaid Program that was paying for this new program was changing its rates. Dr. Fisher pointed out the majority of the women in the First Step Program live in Bremerton. She noted the Board was aware of these concerns prior to their passing the 1991 budget and after the Business Manager put together better predictions it became apparent services would have to be cut unless additional funding was secured. The Board Budget Committee as well as the Board felt that the increase was justified and did vote to approve the amendment. Public comment - none. Mr. Johnson stated he felt the District's labor contracts were awfully high. Dr. Fisher stated through Union negotiations the Board approved pay increases based on the current C.P.I. for the Seattle/Tacoma area. Mr. Morning gave a brief explanation that the Health District had some catching up to do on salaries due to stiff competition from Harrison Hospital and other health care providers. This issue had been surfacing within the Unions over the past two years, but particularly salaries for licensed staff have cost substantially more. Dr. Fisher stated with the growth in the County over the past two years, they have been actively recruiting Community Health nurses as well as environmental specialists. Mr. Johnson stated Bremerton provides the County with homes for most of the low income people, which in turn puts the greatest demand on the Health District leaving Bremerton with the medical bill for all of those individuals. He did not feel it was fair that the County was expecting Bremerton to carry a greater share of the cost. Some of the areas, like Bainbridge Island who does not have a large low income population, should be paying their fair share as well. Ms. Massara provided a handout that discussed the formula calculations for distributing the local governments' contribution to the District. In 1977 the Board of Health hired consultants to determine what would be the most equitable way to distribute local governments' contributions to the Health District. At that time, the formula approved was a combination of percent of population and percent of use by each entity. In 1991, because the smaller entities of the boards get highly impacted due to program changes and more activity within a specific municipality, the Budget Committee received approval from the Board to add assessed value to that formula. Therefore, the County is carrying a larger percentage in 1991 than they had in previous years. The average TAPE #942 City Council Keg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 12 of 18 percent used for 1991 for Bremerton was 18.5%. If they had used the population and activity average only it would have been 25.81% and in 1990 it was 22.1%. Therefore, the percentage has decreased due to the adding of the assessed value. Mr. Johnson pointed out the City's assessed valuation also decreased significantly. Dr. Fisher stated this was the Board's attempt to add in that ability to pay into the formula. President Horton pointed out that Bremerton houses 65% of the low income population and house 50% of the County's population. If Bremerton is carrying that burden housing wise as well as health wise then maybe the County and other municipalities need to carry more of that weight. Mr. Johnson questioned how did the Health District determine if someone is from Bremerton? Ms. Massara stated through a census track...that question is asked at the time patients check in and maps are available to determine their exact location and how it falls within a specific jurisdiction. Mr. Estes questioned what would be the outcome if medical costs continued to escalate 2% per year? Dr. Fisher explained the Health District is not in the business of primary health care. They do provide some direct health care and family planning but much of their work is not direct hands-on health care. They have major responsibilities on communicable diseases, sexually transmitted diseases, such as aids, etc. Their situation is not into the expensive high tech medicine that is going out of control as to costs. Mr. Estes questioned what would happen if the Health District stopped operation? Dr. Fisher stated it would affect Bremerton in the following ways: (1) no restaurant inspections and increased incidents of food born illnesses; (2) more garbage problems than currently experiencing; (3) reduced inspection of landfills; (4) no monitoring of water supply systems; (5) reduction of immunization programs; (5) reduction or elimination of health nurses working with mothers and children; (6) reduction or elimination of family planning services; (7) no well certification; (8) impact on sewer sanitation relating to development projects. Mr. Horninq emphasized the impact on the local Health District from mandated Federal and State regulations. Mr. Waibel stated he hated surprises and was concerned that the City's representatives on the Health District Board did not keep the Council apprised of the increased costs as early as 1990. It bothered him that at the time the 1991 Health District Budget was presented there was not some indication that there were outstanding cost issues which would be readdressed early in 1991. Mr. Homing pointed out Mayor Mentor was the City's representative on that Board and was aware of the impending financial situation and was asked to go to the City Treasurer to do that function and he assumed he did. Mr. Waibel stated Council has two representatives on that Board and they should have conveyed the circumstances as presented during the budget approval process. TAPE #942 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 13 of 18 Mr. Overson pointed out that the actual population percentage of the City in the County came out to 20.1% in 1991. Dr. Fisher stated that change would be reflected in their 1992 budget. Mr. Overson stated when this issue was brought to the Fiscal and Budget Committee Mayor Mentor did not propose a means to fund the increase, however, he did support paying the increased amount. When looking at the financial picture for the remainder of the year there are other concerns that need to be addressed as well. He felt what needed to be determined at this time was to determine the process that would result in a decision on this issue. Mr. Dawklns noted during his tenure as Mayor he had served on this board for 3 years. He stressed the importance of the Health District and the outstanding work accomplished by Dr. Fisher and her staff. Mr. Morning stated reports to Council on Health District activities are recorded on tape. Mr. Collins stated he could not support this proposal due to the fact that the 6.4% C.P.I. had nothing to do with Bremerton or Kitsap County. The 6.4% increase in labor was completely out of scale even though they are professional people. The City and Federal Government have professional staff and they did not receive 6.4% C.P.I. Mr. Overson stated he was aware of the possibility that the formula might be refigured, thereby resulting in a change. Dr. Fisher stated if Mr. Overson had some input as to how to change the formula, the City's representatives on that Board could present them. Their Budget Committee will be meeting in September to work on the 1992 budget and any recommendations should be submitted prior to that time. Mr. Johnson stated he was tired of voting yes on these budgets and would not support this proposal as presented. He stressed he did not have any problem with the services provided by the District, however, he did have big time problems with Bremerton hosting most of the low income people in the County, which increases the costs for 911, public safety, health, etc. When looking at the formula and seeing Winslow/Bainbridge Island paying only 1/2 as much as what Bremerton is paying something is wrong with the system. Dr. Fisher explained Bainbridge Island had just became part of Winslow in April, which is not a full year allocation. Their full year will reflect a greater percentage than what was presented at this time. For the first quarter of the year Bainbridge Island was part of the County. Mr. Colvin questioned if there were extenuating circumstances why the 6.4% COLA was used in determining salary increases? Ms. #1374 TAPE #942 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 14 of 18 Massara stated a two year contract was negotiated and the Board of Health Personnel Committee determined the guidelines for negotiating the contracts. The caveat on that contract was 100% of the Seattle-Tacoma C.P.I.. and during that time the C.I.P. did change to twice yearly. They had always used the Seattle-Tacoma C.I.P. rather than the National Standard. The Board also approved their mileage reimbursement rates to reflect the same as the IRS. Dr. Fisher stated previous C.I.P.'s had been running lower and suddenly it went up to 6.4%. Mr. Overson suggested if this proposal did not pass that it be returned to the Mayor to address some of the Council's concerns with the Health District's Board. He hoped that the information brought to Council relating to their 1992 budget would be based on more factual information. He suggested not supporting this proposal at this time but to come up with another one that provides a vehicle for a better compromise. Mr. Colvinquestioned the impact on the District if Council did not support this proposal? Dr. Fisher stated she would have to go back to the Board of Health to decide what they would want to do. She would anticipate the Board would ask her for recommendations on what cuts could be made for Bremerton. She stated it would be very difficult to cut the health services, however, it would be easier to reduce environmental health services. Mr. Oversonquestioned if less than a months worth of service would be cut if the proposal was not approved? Dr. Fisher stated that would probably be the reality. Mr. Morning encouraged his fellow Council members to be realist and support the proposal. He will meet with Mayor Mentor and Council President to formulate a way to approach the Board of Health and share Council's concerns. M/S/C(Dawkins/Colvin) to approve the increase as presented and have the Council Fiscal and Budget Committee work out the best method of payment. Vote: In Favor: Opposed: Motion'carried. Horning, Dawkins, Colvin, Overson, Horton Waibel, Estes, Collins, Johnson President Morton stated the representatives to the various Councils need a longer lead time to allow them to get back to those Councils for formal discussion before adoption at the subregional group. The County Commissioners have the luxury of not only being the legislative body but also the administrative body and it is easy for them to make those decisions with 10 days lead time. Dr. Fisher stated this year things had settled down in their area and #2078 TAPE #942 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 15 of 18 they feel much more confident that they will have good "figures" to discuss during the budget process. 7B - AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY TO ACCEPT THE AWARD OF GRANT FUNDS FOR DESIGN OF EVERGREEN PARK SHORELINE RESTORATION, #AB91-197 The Department of Community Development submitted a grant application to the State Department Of Ecology to request assistance in developing a design for the Evergreen Park Shoreline Restoration Project. The grant was awarded in the amount of $20,000. Council authorization is required for Mayoral signature of contract accepting award. Connie DevaneV, Grants Manager, stated this is a Coastal Zone Management grant, which is federal monies through the State Department of Ecology. It will be utilized to develop a design for the restoration of a part of the shoreline at Evergreen Park. It will redevelop and restore a natural cove that had existed, however, over the years it had been filled in with concrete and debris. When this cove is restored, it will provide public beach access to the water. Public comment - none. Mr. Dawkins questioned if this was a "matching fund" grant and did the City have funding available through the overwater boardwalk fund? Ms. Devaney stated yes, it is identified under Fisheries Mitigation. Mr. Estes questioned if this grant would include any construction? Ms. Devaney stated it would be limited to design work and would allow some staff time as an in- kind match to develop funds to construct the project. M/S/C/U(Waibel/Colvin) to approve the contract. 8A - RESOLUTION #2357, BENEFIT INCREASE FOR RETIRED EMPLOYEE, #AB91-196 There remains one individual covered by the old City pension plan for non-uniform employees provided for under Ordinance #1572. The attached Resolution would provide a 7.11% increase in this pension benefit as of July 1991, consistent with increases granted to retirees covered under the State Retirement System and uniformed employee pension adjustments which are adjusted by the cost-of- living index each year. Public comment - none. Councilman Collins 'left the Council Chambers at 8:22 p.m. #2257 TAPE #942 City Council Keg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 16 of 18 M/S/C/U(Dawkins/Estes) to approve Resolution #2357 to increase the benefits of employees retired under the provisions of Ordinance No. 1572, as amended and authorized by Ordinance #3411 9A - PUBLIC HEARING - SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM AMENDMENTS AND RESOLUTION #2358 The Bremerton Planning Commission is recommending approval of amendments to the Shoreline Master Program covering the following issues: Public Access; Shore Modification; View Protection, Join- Use Moorage; Kitsap Lake & Kitsap Bog; Housing keeping Items; General Provisions & Procedures; Map Amendments - Annexation Areas. Shoreline Master Program ~mendments are effective only after adoption by the Department Of Ecology (DOE). DOE is responsible to ensure that the City's Master Program is consistent with the Shoreline Management Act and Kitsap County's Master Program. To initiate DOE review and adoption, the City Council forwards a Resolution of Intent To Adopt to DOE. DOE makes its decision after holding at least one public hearing and considering comments of the State Ecology Commission. After DOE approval, the City Council passes an ordinance to adopt the amendments. This final review and approval stage takes 3-6 months. Councilman Waibel stepped down on this issue due to his not being present at the previous hearing nor did he review the official recorded tapes. Kay Wilson, Senior Planner, made a slide presentation illustrating some of the issues that were discussed during the first public hearing that seem to need additional review. She showed a variety of slides showing "public accesses to shorelines" in order to give Council a better idea of projects that other areas had undertaken. She described how such public accesses could be compatible with surrounding residential and commercial facilities. She explained growth management will result in significant and greater concentrations of people in Bremerton and more people will want access to the shorelines that make Bremerton a most liveable City, however, the 11 miles of shorelines will not increase. Last summer the City adopted a Waterfront Access Plan to establish City policy for improving public access to City shorelines. This Plan included a vision of a public access walkway that would run along the shoreline in front of multi-family, commercial, industrial and other intensive new developments. It calls for taking advantage of new developments, such as new City utilities to provide public access opportunities. Since 1989 City shoreline regulations have required public access walkways when new multi-family/commercial developments are built along City shorelines. The new Shoreline Master Plan Program Amendments will refine existing public access requirements and result in more connecting walkway links as City TAPE #942 City Council Keg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 17 of 18 shorelines redevelop. Ms. Wilson pointed out a correction to "Table II, Development Standards...under Residential Detached Dwelling Unit it should say: view corridor would be 25% rather than "40% to 30%". Don Larson, Rainier Avenue, representing Kitsap Diving Association and DOE Citizen Advisory Committee For Sinclair and Dyes Inlet, reported on a Coastweeks event in Tacoma, "Water Access Our Legacy IN Crisis" on September 6-7, which is directly related to this shoreline access. This event will be held at the Tacoma Sheridan at a cost $50 per day or two days $90.00. Additional information may be obtained by calling 943-0394. He reported his Diving Club is working toward establishing an underwater park near the Turner Joy. Viokle Lott urged Council to give serious. consideration to requiring a natural buffer between the walkways and water source. President Morton stated Council did have a discussion on that issue. Mr. Overson expressed concern over the lack of public in attendance at this hearing and questioned if notification had gotten out to the public prior to this meeting? Ms. Wilson stated she does the best she can within their limited budget. Public notice is published three weeks in advance of the public hearing, a mailing is sent out to groups and individuals on their mailing list and she informed the local newspaper and radio stations. Mr. Overson noted Ms. Wilson's presentation on view corridors was very good and brought about some interest. He questioned if consideration would be given to applying the view corridor requirement back beyond the 300 ft. requirement? Ms. Wilson stated that was something that could be addressed by the Zoning Ordinance but the Shoreline Master Program only applies to the first 200 feet up from the water. Ian Sievers, City Attorney, recommended the following changes to the Public Acces section: (1) May 21 document (page 6) Policy #10...delete this as a policy but reference it as a footnote for information. The reason for this change is that statute does not assign liability to the City but does provide immunity from liability for urban recreational lands. That immunity is provided to both private property owners and the City. (2) Page 11, 6b "Access provided at street ends, public utilities and rights-of-way shall not be diminished..", the problem with this statement is that State statute is already very comprehensive and detailed in considering things like public access, shorelines and water related uses and the City could not write something that would cut short or modify what is already spelled out in that statute. There should be simply a footnote that streets and alleys are covered by that ~0~5 TAPE #942 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes July 31, 1991 Page 18 of 18 RCW. (3) Pages 11/12 - Handicapped Access Provision - for all appearances Regulation 6.d. is exactly the same coverage as (f) located on Page 12. He recommended striking (f) out of the text. (4) Page 28 -Policy 1. -"Develop existing and acquired public lands"... the second sentence directs the seller vacate these lands only if they have demonstrated limited recreation or public access potential. He recommended striking the last sentence since Council already has the policy of reviewing surplus properties, referral to department heads and recommendations by the Planning Commission; and for park lands, the Parks Board. Also, this seems to be a financial decision which is not something covered by the Shorelines Management Act. Don Pratt, Director of Community Development, stated he concurred with Mr. Sievers' suggested changes. Mr. Johnson pointed out on revised page 91, Camp McKean is located on the west side of Kitsap Lake not the east side. And, the Department Of Community Development wants to make sure none of the piers on fresh water (Page 90, Paragraph 4(b.iii.) are more than one foot over the ordinary high water mark. He noted in Kitsap Lake that would be hard to determine because the water level was controlled by a small dam at the opposite end of the lake. He felt the requirement should be changed to reflect at least two feet. Ms. Wilson stated it does apply to both marine and fresh water, and is determined one way on marine waters and another way on lake waters. Kitsap Lake is a difficult lake and it was her understanding that the Department of Fishers had controlled the lake level for many years but are no longer taking that responsibility. They have given up the easement they had over private property in order to control the lake . Mr. Johnson stated what the Department Of Fisheries indicated was they were abandoning any efforts to control the lake and just maintain the salmon flows and separation between the Bass/Salmon, etc. M/S/C/U(Colvin/Dawkins) to approve Resolution #2358 as presented, including amendments made by the City Attorney and Mr. Johnson. With no further business meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. APPROVED ~HOR~ON, Council President City of Bremerton KLM/LH/me cc: Normal Distribution KATHLEEN L. MCCLUSKEY, CITY CLERK