HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/29/91TAPE #926
UNAPPROVED DRAFT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUW /99/
#0018
#0043
MAY 29, 1991
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers,
239 4TH Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, May 29 1991,
at 5:30 p.m., with Council President Lynn Horton presiding.
Council members present: Lon Overson, Wayne Estes, Spencer
Horning, Hank Waibel, C. R. "Tiny" Collins, Morrie Dawkins, A1
Colvin and Russ Johnson. Also present were City Attorney Ian
Sievers and City Clerk Kathleen McCluskey.
The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by
Council President Horton and Invocation given by Councilman A1
Colvin.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes Of Meeting - May 1, 1991, #AB91-142
B. Minutes Of Meeting - May 8, 1991, #AB91-142
M/S/C/U(Waibel/Estes) to approve Consent Agenda as correction,
amending the May 1, 1991, minutes to show Council Hank Waibel
as absent.
CLAIMS/WARRANT REGISTERS
Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as
required by RCW 42.24,080, and those expense reimbursement
claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been
recorded on a listing that had been made available to the
council.
M/S/C(Colvin/Dawkins) on May 29, 1991, the Council does
approve for payment those vouchers included and further
described as follows: 129879, 130029 through 130178 in the
amount of $272,654.68; and Fire Fighters Retro Pay for the
period ending 4-15-91, in the total amount of $35,238.11;
Regular Payroll for the period ending May 15, 1991, in the
total amount of $403,648.57.
Vote: In Favor:
Johnson, Colvin, Dawkins, Collins, Horton,
Horning, Waibel, Estes
Abstain: Overson
President Horton announced Item 6A was pulled off the Agenda
for one week.
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 2 of 11
COUNCIL MEMBER REPORT8
Mr. Johnson stated it was with pride that he viewed the avenue
of flags displayed by the Cemetery on Kitsap Way. And, he
appreciated all the residents who decorated graves in
commemoration of Memorial Day.
Mr. Colvin announced he invited some guests to attend this
Council meeting, the Carl Vinson Golden Eagles Softball Team,
sponsor of the Softball Tournament, and James Gwinn of Crista
Ministries. These guests will speak during the time of Public
Recognition.
Mr. Dawkins stated he was pleased with the increased
activities for the Memorial Days celebration and he enjoyed
the members of the HMS Warspite, who were visiting this area.
Mr. Collins stated last week a local newspaper made a
statement that citizens of Bremerton were not particularly
interested in the new highway into Bremerton. He wanted to
let the public know that there had better be some interest in
this project because if there isn't there will be so many cars
in the neighborhoods that one will never be able to get out of
the southwest corner of Bremerton. For example, through the
intersection of Callow and Farragut there is an average of
26,400 vehicles per day. Where these vehicles are going is
immaterial, that is how many vehicles are traveling through
that intersection today. When the Navy acquires all the land
to Wycoff, those vehicles will have to go some place. At the
present time there are 9,500 vehicles going into the shipyard.
Approximately 7,000 vehicles travel along Wycoff Avenue each
day. The Navy, in their preliminary E.I.S. stated Wycoff
would have to accept another 13,900 vehicles and that
Cambrian, which is a 25 foot street, is going to have to
accept an additional 13,000 vehicles. Mr. Collins expressed
"it can't happen"! He hope people were thinking of
alternatives ... the City has with its proposal of using
Burwell across to Gorst. The point made by the local
newspaper that there was not any interest in this project was
wrong...there is interest but people don't know what to do.
Mr. Collins explained they should contract the Engineers at
Parametrix and tell them what they want, how they want to
live, the mitigating things they want in order to live here.
The people on Burwell need to be asking questions about noise
mitigation. The people in old Charleston had better tell the
Engineers the things they need. President Morton announced
Council would be holding a Study Session on Monday, June 3,
and one of the items to be discussed would be the new entrance
into Bremerton. She encouraged anyone interested to attend
this meeting to learn more about the proposal.
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 3 of 11
Mr. Estes stated during the past two weeks he had the pleasure
of associating with members of the HMS Warspite Association.
He commended Sgt. Majors (Retired) Bob Sauter and Richard
Chrisinger for their tremendous job in hosting this group. He
invited members of the Warspite Association to say a few words
about how they feel about Bremerton: Start Lawrence of Great
Britain, George Mammering of Australia, Bill Foster, Wittel
Enqland, Bill Biars of Scotland, expressed their deepest
appreciation for the tremendously warm welcome they received
from everyone here in Bremerton. Their entire visit exceeded
their expectations and it was with a reluctant heart they were
leaving their many Bremerton friends. They gave a special
thank you to Bob Sauter and Richard Chrisinger for their
outstanding job as hosts to their group. Mr. Lawrence
presented Mayor Mentor with a special wreath. Richard
Chrisinger introduced Verna Lilly, who will escort the
Warspite members on a boat cruse to Seattle.
Mr. Waibel stated he was very impressed with Amy Burnett's
Gallery Open House and he had already overheard someone in
Tacoma taking about the gallery. He was also impressed with
Bremerton's Armed Forces Parade, which had a good crowd in
spite of the rainy weather. He did have the opportunity to
visit with members of the Warspite group during the Navy
League reception held on Saturday, May 25, and found them to
be very interesting and informative on people and historical
events.
Mr. Overson pointed out TCI Cablevision was doing some
interesting things with channel programming.
Mrs. Morton alerted the public about TCI's new practice of
"negative billing", whereby they put on a new channel program
which is received by everyone on cable and in order to cancel
such service it must be made in writing. Mr. Johnson stated
if someone had a complaint about their service they should
call the City Clerk's office or the Cable Company and ask that
your complaint be recorded in their logs and it would be
considered when time comes to refranchise. These complains
would also be forwarded to the Federal Communications
Commission, who keep track of such things.
PUBLIC RECOGNITION
Mayor Louis Mentor read a Proclamation proclaiming the week of
June 2-8, 1991, as NATIONAL SAFE BOATING WEEK. Verna Lilly
Commander of Flotilla 45 Coast Guard Auxiliary, accepted the
Proclamation and explained they patrol the waters every
weekend and all holidays from May 1 until end of September.
Jack Hisong, Commander of the Bremerton Power Squadron,
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 4 of 11
announced their Squadron sponsors public boating coarse
several times a year and he invited the public to attend the
next coarse starting in the fall of this year.
Mayor Mentor read a Proclamation proclaiming the week of June
3 -7, 1991, as MANAGEMENT WEEK. Janet Brittain, Past
President of the Lockheed/Bangor Chapter of National
Management Association and currently a National Director on
the Board of the National Management Association representing
Western Washington, accepted the proclamation.
Jim Gwinn, President Crista Ministries/Seattle based, stated
their organization is also located in Kitsap County. He was
chairman of the recent Billy Graham Crusade, held in
Seattle/Tacoma, and had the opportunity to meet A1 Colvin
during that event. The Crista Ministries has taken over as of
July 1, Bremerton Christian School (to be named King's West)
with an anticipated enrollment of 300 students K-12. They
also have two camp facilities in Kitsap County, Miracle Ranch
and Island Lake. They have a Counseling ministry (five)
throughout the Pacific Northwest and one of those is located
in Silverdale. Their organization also owns two radio
stations -KCIS (AM630) and KCMS FM. He was pleased to be a
part of the greater Kitsap County community.
Dave Ajax, sponsor of the Slow Pitch Softball Tournament, held
May 25/26 at Lions Field, thanked the City Council and the
Kitsap County Commissioners for the proposed new softball
fields to be constructed at the sports complex. The only
complaints he heard from people involved in the tournament was
the limited number of hotel/motel rooms. The winner of this
tournament was the Uptown Auto Body Team and second place went
to the USS Carl Vinson Golden Eagles. Don Large, sponsor of
the Uptown Auto Body Team, thanked the Parks Department for
getting the fields ready and the Carl Vinson team for putting
up an excellent fight. He was real impressed with Golden
Eagles' sportsmanship. A special thank.you was given to KBRO
for providing publicity for the event. Bruce LennV stated it
was nice winning such a high caliber ball game and he was
happy keeping the winning trophy in Bremerton. He was also
looking forward to the development of a new sports complex for
future tournaments.
Gregory Keith, Captain of the USS Carl Vinson Gold Eagles
Softball Team, introduced his fellow members of the ball team
and expressed their appreciation being able to pay in such a
tournament and they had a great time. He congratulated the
first place team. The team presented to A1 Colvin a hat,
making him an honorary member of their team. And, he stated
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 5 of 11
since the Carl Vinson arrived in Bremerton the crew members
and their families had received a very warm welcome from the
community and they appreciate that very much. Mr. Waibel
noted one of the reasons the Carl Vinson team was so good was
due to their practicing on the flight deck while the ship was
at sea.
Jim McNamara, a Special Olympics athletes, expressed the need
to find some ball fields and gyms where the Special Olympic
athletes could practice for their events. Many of the local
fields are taken up by other organizations. Their goal is to
have a tournament in the Bremerton area but they need help
from the community to find fields and gyms to hold such
events. President Hotton suggested that Mr. McNamara talk
with Mayor Mentor and Vicki Vanneman of the Parks Department.
Councilman Dawkins left the Council meeting at '6:15 p.m.
Del Knauss, Olympic Avenue, discussed the following issues:
(1) changing the form of City government - he did not support
changing the form of government but rather change the people
running City government. (2) Proposed new roadway into
Bremerton - he did not believe Mayor Mentor's statements
during a hearing before the Parks Commission were good reasons
for spending the taxpayers money, if a less expensive route
exists (3) Building a Department of Corrections Pre-Release
Facility in Bremerton - he did not support this proposal and
questioned why form a committee to study proposals if the
"deal" was already worked out. (4) House purchased by the
City next to Ivy Green Cemetery with the intent to turn it
into visitors' parking - he felt this was a good idea but
since the lot was not zoned for parking, he questioned if the
City would follow the same zoning rules that apply to every
other resident in Bremerton?
Bean Newsome, Bremerton homeowner, expressed concern over
opportunities for the public to give input on the new proposed
entrance into the City. He hoped there would be more meetings
on this issue at varying times in order to give people working
on various shiftsto have the opportunity to give input.
President Morton stated there will be more pubic hearings on
this issue and invited anyone interested to the Council's
Study Session on Monday, June 3, when Parametrix would give a
briefing to the Council. Mr. Newsome noted a lot of elder
people live in his neighborhood, who have difficultly getting
out to meetings at night and hoped there would be some way to
assist transporting those people to future meetings.
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 6 of 11
7A - ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL REAL
ESTATE EXCISE TAX, #AB91-144
Bremerton currently imposes a 1/4% excise tax on real estate
sales for the funding of local capital improvement projects.
Chapter 17 Section 38 of Washington Laws 1990, allows cities
to impose an addition to the 1/4% already imposed. This
additional 1/4% does not require a vote by the people. The
City of Bremerton is authorized by Washington Law to impose
the tax by ordinance.
In 1990 the 1/4% excise tax generated $140,000. Had we
collection another 1/4%, the amount of money collected would
have been twice as much or $280,000. The first four months of
1991, the 1/4% excise tax generated $38,300. Had we
collection another 1/4%, the amount of money collected would
have been twice as much or $76,500.
Each member of Council received copies of the Growth
Management Act approximately 6 months ago. However, in case
this has been misplaced, attached is Washington Law, Section
38 allowing this tax and spelling out how it may be spent.
The County Treasurer collects the tax and remits to the City.
They are unable to provide a breakdown of commercial versus
residential sales. We have requested this information from
the local real estate industry and it will be presented at
Council, if available.
The City's five year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) passed
last year and is in the process of being updated. We will
expand the CIP as necessary to comply with Section 7
requirements.
With passage of the excise tax, we will be following the lead
of the County who is collecting and holding the tax in reserv~
until such time as the capital facilities plan element of the
Comprehensive Plan is complete. As you may recall, the County
and cities employed a consultant to assist in this process.
The growth in Bremerton is obvious and the demand for capital
improvements is growing. The sooner this tax is approved the
better we serve our citizens.
Mayor Mentor stated we are a tax poor City and this is an
opportunity to increase revenues. When the State gives cities
the opportunity to make such an increase and the opportunity
is not taken, then cities can be penalized by the State later
on. All of the funds collected would be used for CIP
projects. Currently, there are a lot of real estate
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 7 of 11
transactions being made and it is an opportune time for the
City to benefit for future development.
Public comment - none.
Mr. Overson stated the additional tax revenue that this
proposal would generate would fund needed projects on the CIP
and maybe the City would have a change to catch up rather than
always slipping behind on making improvements.
Mr. Johnson stressed that the general feeling is to shy away
from new taxes, however, if the City is to grow there will be
need to fund public projects to meet increased needs. He felt
it was most appropriate placing the burden of growing needs on
the real estate transactions. He stated he strongly supports
this proposal and believes it will bring about many
improvements for the community.
Mr. Waibel pointed out that the description in the title of
the Ordinance should read as follows: "An Ordinance imposing
upon consumers an additional one-quarter percent (1/4%)excise
tax on real property sales".
Mr. Morning stated he was not in favor of taxes, however, we
must have them to provide needed services. He would support
this proposal, but he was reluctant to do so. Because it
would become part of the CIP, he will make a big deal out of
this if it doesn't go to something that helps the real estate
in this town. For instance, he felt the non-arterial streets
is a prime candidate for these funds. He would be strongly
supportive identifying this money to and moving the non-
arterial streets to a high priority in capital improvements.
Mr. Collins stated he did not support earmarking any specific
amount of money for a known today Capital Improvement
project. We do have the Six Year Street Plan as well as
another alternative - the Limited Improvement District (LID).
If Council feels they should include a non-arterial street
project annually on the CIP, using the excise tax, he would
support it.
Mr. Colvin stated he did not believe there was anything in the
proposal to preclude using the funds for non-arterial street
improvements. He supported giving street improvements a
higher priority because the real estate the tax will be
imposed on are located on those streets.
President Morton stated she would support this proposal, and
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 8 of 11
there are so many things in the City that need to be improved
and could be accomplished through this funding opportunity.
Even though those tax dollars may not go as far as we would
like, it does show that we are using those tax dollars in a
way that the citizens can see it is beneficial to them. And,
it commits to something up front and shows we are interested
in the non-arterial street needs.
#2207
M/S/C/U(Johnson/Colvin) to approve ordinance, on first
reading, as amended imposing upon consumers an additional one-
quarter percent (1/4%) excise tax on real property sales.
7B - ORDINANCE (FIRST READING) BONDS FOR MUNICIPAL CONTRACTS,
#AB 91-145
Under RCW 39.08, a bond is required of any person/organization
who contracts with the City to perform work. Cities are
granted authority to determine by ordinance the bond amounts,
provided that they are not less than 25% of the contract
price.
Ian Sievers, City Attorney, stated this would take advantage
of a local option that is provided in State law that
performance bond requirements for public works and in certain
types of projects the City may want to set less than 100%
bond, resulting in eventual savings on the project.
Public comment - none.
Mr. Waibel stated while he agreed with the originator of the
Ordinance, this would place an additional burden on Council.
In the past, there was a strict 100% bonding in place and that
may have made it difficult for local people to bid on City
projects. The City does want to use local businesses but we
don't want the City to be taken advantage of either. We will
need to make sure, when reviewing contracts, that this will be
one of the items to be reviewed by the Council to see if we
agree with reduction of bonding.
Mr. Estes questioned what guarantee do the taxpayers of this
City have that these jobs will be completed? Mr. Sievers
stated this proposal would reduce the security requirement and
the City could always sue the contractor and if they go
bankrupt the surety could be sued. Hopefully, this would be
provided on only those contracts where we are recovering some
value on the project as the project proceeds, so that the City
would not be at risk on those types of projects. If the
surety company goes broke, that could present a problem for
the City. There is review of the credit worthiness of the
surety. Mr. Estes questioned if there was any advantage to
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 9 of 11
the City to do this? Mr. Sievers stated he believed there was
and this would make the contracts more available to local
bidders. Actually, all the costs are passed along to the City
when bids are made on projects and the City can require less
of performance bond, thereby reducing the cost of the public
works project.
Mr. Johnson questioned who would decide what the reduction of
bond would be and what would that decision be based on? Mr.
Sievers stated it would be an up front decision made by the
administrator and in most cases that would be the City
Engineer since he puts together the bid specs for public works
contracts. He would have to make an assessment and the
contract would be bid based on that as one of the
requirements. Mr. Johnson stated he had a concern if he were
an administrator and he had a limited budget and bids on a
project came in high he might negotiate away the bond in order
for it to come in on budget. Or, in making a decision as a
Council member he might be influenced to make a decision based
on a cost savings for a particular reason, such as paying the
insurance. He did not know how Council will know when that
decision was made to cut back on the contract costs. Mr.
Sievers noted as Councilman Waibel stated perhaps this would
be something that would need to be flagged when the acceptance
of the bid was brought back to Council. Mr. Johnson stated he
would feel more comfortable if the Risk Manager had input or
we knew that there was concurrence from that area. Kathleen
McOluskeV, City Clerk, stated there is concurrence from the
Risk Manger through her review of the contract prior to its
going out for bid. The requirement for bonding and who the
surety company is, do go through the Risk Manager for review.
President Morton questioned if there are types of projects
that, by their nature, tend to be more high risk, in which
case by Administrative Policy those would be deemed as 100%
bond requirement and/or a minimum reduction in the bond? Mr.
Sievers noted that was the point when tearing up streets to
put in sewers could leave streets torn up, which is a lot
worse than when the project was started. When building a
building from a piece of flat land the City would be getting
value as the project progressed.
Mr. Johnson expressed concern with what would be considered
appropriate bonding level three years hence. He would like to
make the assumption that a project is 100% bonded and if it
isn't he wanted to know why not.
Mr. Waibel stated the City has had problems in this area and
that was why part of the "boiler plate" contract needed one
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 10 of 11
section devoted to "bonding" and that section should be
checked each time a contract came to Council. Ms. McCluskey
stated unfortunately the contract approval by Council comes
after the steps allowed after bid award. Mr. Waibel stated he
would assume the administrator would make sure they had good
reasons for reducing the bond. Ms. McCluskey stated the
intent of this proposal was that the City would get better
bids if it had more flexibility in bonding requirements. And,
as stated by the City Attorney, the City Engineer is the one
who would most likely be making those recommendations. She did
not believe the project would be affected under the scenario
of not having enough money because the administration is so
conscious of the City's liability and exposure that would be
of more importance than what dollar amount the bids would come
in. The Legislature changed this law to give cities more
'flexibility and that is what the City is attempting to do.
Mr. Johnson expressed concern that there was no policy
guidance. He suggested checking with some of the other larger
cities, such as Seattle and Tacoma and see if they are doing
the same thing.
Mr. Morning pointed out what is done is to set policy in
advance and you don't negotiate it after the contract is let
to reduce the price. Council does set policy and that was
where he saw the most critical area and why he was
uncomfortable with passing this ordinance at this time. He
stressed that Council needed a "policy discussion" on this
issue and that it was a far bigger arena to be concerned with
than is realized. He encouraged Council to not approve this
proposal but to set up a time to study the issue. He
questioned if there was a particular project that the
administration wanted to reduce the bonding? Mr. Sievers
stated the Public Works Complex project specs were being
developed.
Mr. Estes expressed concern that something might happen on a
project in Bremerton similar to the disaster of the 1-90
Bridge in Seattle.
Mr. Colvin stated he was not prepared to vote on this issue
and desired further study of the proposal.
TAPE #926
City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes
May 29, 1991
Page 11 of 11
#2808
M/S/C/U(Horning/Johnson) to continue this item up to three
weeks while staff prepares some discussion on this item.
with no further business meeting adjourned at 6:52 p.m.
KATHLEEN L. McCLUSKEY, C{ty Clerk
, Council President
City of Bremerton
KLM/LH/me
cc: Normal Distribution
File/Vault