Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/14/93CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES #0014 #0036 APRIL 14, 1993 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Bremerton was called to order in the City Council Chambers, 239 4th Street, Bremerton, Washington, Wednesday, April 14, 1993, at 5:30 p.m., with Council President Eileen Fitz presiding. Council members present were Richard Neville, Lynn Horton, Hank Waibel, C. R. "Tiny" Collins, Morrie Dawkins,.A1 Colvin and Russ Johnson. Councilman Lon Overson was absent. Also present were City Attorney Ian Sievers and City Clerk Kathleen McCluskey. The meeting opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Council President Fitz and Invocation given by Chaplain Bob Marshall of the USS Texas. CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes Of Meeting - March 31, 1993, #AB93-066 M/S/C/U(Waibel/Colvin) presented. to approve the Consent Agenda as CLAIMS/WARRANT REGI8TERS Vouchers audited and certified by the auditing officer as required by RCW 42.24.080, and those expense reimbursement claims certified as required by RCW 42.24.090, have been recorded on a listing that had been made available to the council. M/S/C/U(Horton/Colvin) April 14, 1993, the Council does approve for payment those vouchers included and further described as follows: 165460 through 165600 in the total amount of $263,225.52, which also included the Total Furnishings claim ($6,419.43) that was pulled off the Register last week. COUNCIL MEMBER REPORT8 Mr. Colvin announced he had been selected as "one of the 10 most wanted" for the American Cancer Society fund raising event. As a part of that event, the "10 most wanted" are pictured behind bars and the intent is for those behind bars to solicit funds for the Cancer Society in order to "get out of jail". He related an incident where his grandson saw the picture and questioned his grandma why was his grandpa in jail? She responded that grandpa had to raise money for the Cancer Society... so his grandson dug into his pocket and came out with two cents and gave them to his grandma for his grandpa's bail. Mr. Colvin emphasized how much he appreciates TAPE #1099 City Council Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 2 of 23 citizen responses to his request for funds for this worthwhile cause. Anyone wishing to donate towards his "bail" can make a donation at Paul's Pharmacy at Sheridan Village Shopping Center. Mr. Colvin reminded everyone of District #1's Neighborhood Coalition meeting to be heldApril 15, 7:00 P.M., at the Sheridan Park Recreation Center. Lastly, he thanked City employees for their responses to his concerns. Mr. Dawkins stated he was looking forward to participating in the Christmas In April program that will take place on April 17. Mr. Collins reported on April 12 Bremerton Parks and Recreation Department honored approximately 130 volunteers for their volunteer efforts this past year. Mr. Neville reported he and his son spent some enjoyable time together last week during "spring break". Mrs. Hotton reported on April 13 she attended a function at the CenCom office in celebration of National Telecommunicators Week. This event was recognizing the efforts of the CenCom Dispatchers by the community. At that time, she told the Dispatchers the board members who represent the City receive very few phone calls that are ones of a complaint nature and the absence of negative is generally an indicator that a good and positive job is being done. She communicated the City's appreciation for their work and commitment to the citizen of Bremerton and Kitsap County. Mr. Waibel reported during the past few weeks he has traveled through Gorst a number of times and was pleased to report that Dan Robinson's garden on the waterfront is coming along nicely. Mrs. Fits stated she received a call from a resident in the area of 6th and Cambrian, who again has lots of litter on the street where she lives. She asked that those who live in that area to please keep lids on garbage cans and glass bottles off the street. On April 13 a Growth Management Committee meeting was held with Kitsap County Commissioners Granlund and Horsley. At that meeting, growth management issues were discussed including places where we need to work together. Things the County and City have in common to work on are construction of streets and sewers and areas that we share borders. She felt this meeting was a good beginning and she looks forward to having more meetings with the County Commissioners on this subject. TAPE #1099 City Council Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 3 of 23 PUBLIC RECOGNITION Mayor Louis Mentor wished President Fitz a "Happy Birthday". He was pleased to announce the Bremerton boardwalk has been entered as a finalist in a contest for Excellence In Concrete. The Use And Design, a State contest. Today he attended Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization meeting, which was held in Bremerton. The agenda at that meeting included prioritizing enhancement projects for ISTEA (Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act) funds. Mayor Mentor is chairing that group and was pleased to host them on sunny day in Bremerton. He also attended a meeting of the Kitsap County Recreational Council where they talked about parks and recreation in Kitsap County. He noted Bremerton is fortunate to have a long established parks program. There is lots of new building going on in the County, however, parks are not being provided. Any park development/enhancement in the County will help out the City due to the heavy use of City parks by County residents. He reported he and his wife were recipients of awards at the Parks Department's recognition of volunteers for their being Frankenstein and Frankenstein's Bride at the Sheridan Center Halloween Program. On Monday, April 12, the City planted a tree at Kiwanis Park in memory of David Bevans, who assisted the City in getting the Christmas In April program off to a good start. On April 10 a benefit concert was held at the RoxyTheater for the Kitsap Community Action Program (KCAP) and he enjoyed seeing people enjoying the downtown area during the evening hours. On April 8 he participated in a Block Grant program in Seattle - the Noel House, a women's shelter. At that event, Bremerton had a display board showing Block Grant funded projects and he believed the City's Block Grant program was much more diversified than those of larger cities. Mayor Mentor announced Spring Clean Up will be heldApril 17 - 25. From 11:00 AM to 7:00 P.M., daily, the City will accept yard waste at Evergreen Park. If Bremerton residents go to the Olympic Landfill between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., they will accept old mattresses and furniture at 1/2 the usual rate (proof of residency will be required). He reported on April 10 Port Orchard held their second annual Sea Gull Calling Contest. He was proud to announce his son won the award for "the most birds called" (42), and his granddaughter, who is three years old, won for the "most unusual call" - HERE BIRDIE! Mayor Mentor read the following Proclamations: 1) April 18 - 24, 1993, Credit Education Week In Bremerton. Mary Lou Addy, Office Manager Westhills Honda, accepted the proclamation and thanked Mayor Mentor and City Council for the TAPE #1099 City Council Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 4 of 23 Proclamation. She noted efforts are being made to get into the School Districts in Kitsap and Mason County and instill a program for youth to better understand the wise use of credit. 2) April 12 -17, 1993, National Christmas In April Week. Terrie Skelly, Kitsap County Home Builders Association, accepted the Proclamation and noted there are approximately 300-400 volunteers who make this program a success. Berry Keenen, Keenan Design, thanked Mayor Mentor and the City Council for the Proclamation and noted he had the honor of replacing Dave Bevans as a House Captain. 3) April 20, 1993, National Youth Service Day. Alice E~ans, Vice President of the NAACP, presented Councilman Colvin with a check representing a donation from the NAACP to the American Cancer Association, and as part of Councilman Colvin's "bail" to get him out of the Cancer Society's "Jail". Mr. Cclvin expressed his thanks to the NAACP and was thrilled with their proactive response. Carol Grogan, Kitsap Community Action Program (KCAP), announced KCAP will hold their 10th annual Awards Banquet on April 30th, 6:30 P.M., at Olympic College. 6A - INFORMATION ITEM - AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT - ,,REVIEW CITY CHARTERAND FORM OF GOVERh'MENT't,#AB93-067 The Bremerton City Council established an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee, though adoption of Resolution #2401/September 9, 1992, to evaluate Bremerton City government and City Charter, to report their findings and make recommendation appropriate for changes to the Charter and/or City government. President Fits introduced Cecil McConne11, Chairman of the Ad Hoc Committee and committee members Del Knauss, Larry Stone and Barbara Boyd, as well as Pat Mason, representing Municipal Research Center Services. She noted not all of the Ad Hoc Committee members could be present at this meeting. Cecil McConne11, Chairman Ad Hoc Citizens Advisory Committee, stated in September 1992 Council took action to form the Ad Hoc Committee for government review. The Committee met for the first time on September 29, 1992, followed by weekly meetings for a total of 30+ meetings. The Committee interviewed Mayor Mentor and all of the current City Council members, City department heads, ex-governmental officials from other cities as well as Bremerton, Mayors from other cities, Council members from other cities, County Executives, City TAPE #1099 City Council Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 5 of 23 Managers, etc. Mr. McConnell emphasized the Committee worked very hard and were very conscientious in accomplishing their tasks. Larry Stone, Secretary for the Ad Hoc Committee, stated in order to keep the presentation in a brief form he would read into the record the report prepared by the Ad Hoc Committee (note: report will be referred to as Exhibit #A and made a part of the official meeting minutes). Pat Mason, representative from Municipal Research Services Center (MRSC), reviewed the following five points under the "OPTIONAL MUNICIPAL CODE": 1) Until 1969 there were four classes of incorporated municipalities in the State of Washington. These four classes were first, second, third and fourth with the classification depending solely on population. (Bremerton became a first class city because its population was over 20,000.) 2) Only first class cities with charters had local home rule authority at that time. All other cities were subject to what is known as the "Dillon Rule", which indicates that a municipality only has those powers which are expressly ~ranted to it by statute or those which can be necessarily implied from the powers expressly granted. Any doubt is resolved against the municipality. 3) The Optional Municipal Code was enacted in 1969 to allow any city in the State of whatever size to achieve local statutory home rule authority by adopting the Optional Municipal Code. It is an alternative form of government which is available to any City in this State. (Mr. Mason pointed out if cities exercise that option, they have all the powers that a first class city has or any other class of city. It has a broad home rule authority that any city can have in this state.) 4) There are at least 146 cities that have adopted the Optional Municipal Code since 1969. All of these cities are noncharter code cities. No city which has ever adopted the code has abandoned it later, although this is an option. 5) No first class city has ever adopted the Optional Municipal Code in this state. The City of Vancouver, which is a first class city, did consider adopting the Optional Municipal Code but has not yet done so. Mr. Mason provided a document titled "A Comparison Of The Powers Of A Council-Mayor, Noncharter Code City and the City TAPE #1099 City Council Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 6 of 23 of Bremerton Under Its Present Charter", herein after referred to as Exhibit B and made a part of the official meeting minutes. Mrs. Hortonquestioned for clarification what was meant by the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation for a Charter Code city? Mr. Mason stated the Option Municipal Code provides two options: (1) noncharter code city; (2) charter code city. He emphasized currently Bremerton has a local charter that sets out its form of government. If the City of Bremerton was a charter code city it would have a charter that could be tailored with the provisions desired, which could even override some of the provisions in the Optional Municipal Code. For example, under the Optional Municipal Code there is provision for seven City Council members, however, under the City's charter that number could be overridden and 9 members could be stipulated. And, the Citylwould have to indicate that the City's charter would prevail over the Code provision and it would. Mrs. Horton requested Mr. Mason to include that third classification in writing by the public hearing on this issue on April 28th? Mr. Mason emphasized the content of the charter would be up to the individual cities. The City could adopt the existing charter they so desire. Mrs. Hotton questioned if there could at least be a third category that discusses that point. Mr. Mason stated he would rework that information by the time of the public hearing. Mr. C01vin stated under the Mayor, as chief administrator, he appoints department heads and Council has confirmation authority. He questioned if that would also apply under the City Manager form of government? Mr. Mason stated no, under the City Manager form of government the City Manager would make appointment of department heads. ME. Colvin questioned if a City Manager could make changes in at will personnel if he so desired? Mr. Mason stated yes. However, the City Manager could not change someone protected under Civil Service statues. He pointed out most department heads are not Civil Service. Mrs. Hortonquestioned if the City went to a charter code city, could the charter provide for confirmation of Department Heads by Council? Mr. Mason stated yes. Mr. Colvin questioned if Council desired could they convert all City managers under the Civil Service System? Mr. Mason stated as he understands the code City provisions, Civil Service would only apply to Police and Fire unless there was prior coverage for other positions, which could probably be grandfathered in. He believed department heads would remain "at will" employees. TAPE #1099 City Council Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 7 of 23 Mr. Collins questioned for clarification the point addressing prohibiting election campaign contributions in excess of $350.00 from any individual? He interprets that point to mean that he, as a candidate could not give himself more than $350.00 to run a campaign. Mr. Stone stated what Mr. Collins was reading is what he would read. He noted the City of Seattle exempts the individual who is running for the position. He stated he could not say the committee as a whole discussed the individual aspect of that issue. Mr. McConne11 stated the State and Federal law exempt the candidate themselves from any limit on the amount of money they can spent on a campaign. Mr. Collins stated he believes wording of that section should be changed to reflect that the candidate themselves would be except from the limit on campaign contributions for his campaign. Mr. Johnson expressed his appreciation for the support given by Mr. Mason and his fellow staff members at Municipal Research Center Services. Mr. Colvin expressed his appreciation of the prompt services rendered by Mr. Mason and fellow staff members of MRSC Bill Hilton, Home Builders Association, stated in the current form of government there are checks and balances with the Mayor's veto power. He questioned how do you protect yourself against a "bad" vote under a new form of government? Mr. Mason stated under a charter code city the Mayor does not have a veto. There is a separation of powers with a City Manager being the chief administrative officer and the City Council being the legislative body. He did not know of a comparable provision to a veto, but there are other class of cities where the Mayor does not have a veto and they seem to work. Mr. McConnell raised the question during the time of the current form of government how many vetoes were invoked by the Mayor? Mr. Johnson stated one and that was over turned by the City Council. Mr. Collins stated before a performance audit can be made there needs to be criteria that employees are to function to; and at the present time there is nothing like that available. He questioned how did the City go about getting such criteria? Mr. Stone stated the concept he had in mind, when talking about a performance audit, is performance capacity - functions performed. Included in that would be job descriptions, mission, and goals set out in order to measure performance. What the Committee is seeking is more than fiscal accountability. Mr. Collins questioned the time to set something up to address the performance issue? Mr. Stone stated he did not care to engage in setting a time for the TAPE #1099 City Council Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 8 of 23 audits, but consideration must be given as to how they should be set up. Mr. Collins questioned how was that to be done? Mr. Stone stated he would be glad to sit down and discuss it with Mr. Collins at another time. President Fitz thanked the Ad Hoc Committee and Pat Mason for their presentation. She reminded everyone the public hearing on this issue is scheduled for April 28. 7A -FARMER8 MARKET AGREEMENT TO OPERATE ON THE BOARDWALK, #AB93-069 City staff and Farmers Market Board have completed negotiations on the Farmers Market Agreement to operate the Market on the City boardwalk for the 1993 summer season. This agreement is in addition to the Farmers Market Vending License required under BMC 5.30 and includes lease conditions, operating requirements and boardwalk placement. Paula Johnson, License Inspector, explained in February staff presented to Council a regulatory ordinance providing for a Master License for the Farmers Market operating on the boardwalk this summer. With that, Council preliminarily approved a Farmers Market Agreement. City staff met with the Farmers Market board and negotiated an agreement using the document previously reviewed by Council as a base. The agreement being brought forth at this time is a negotiated agreement with all sides agreeing, if Council concurs. Following are the negotiated changes: 1) Article 3 - the Farmers Market board asked that the City not stipulate the amount of hours per Sunday or that they be tied to a specific amount of additional days, special events or promotions besides the Sundays. Staff changed the wording to "Parks Director approval" to cover both of those areas. 2) Article 4 - the Farmers Market Association did not want to be tied to a minimal percentage for members dues. They wanted the flexibility to make a determination on what fits the organization best, but the City will continue to receive 1% as lease payment. 3) Article 5 - the lease payment requirement was "beefed up" stipulating that it was due monthly within 30 days at the end of the month. 4) Article 6 - wording was desired to say they would clean up in the immediate area of the surrounding area of the boardwalk function instead of stipulating an actual footage, which was 25 feet. TAPE #1099 City Council Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 9 of 23 5) Article 8 - the Farms Market board wanted to be able to place banners not only on public right-of-way, such as across the street, but on the boardwalk itself. Wording was included allowing such action with Parks Director's approval. 6) Article 10 - erroneously, this article still had the liquor liability language for insurance and that has now been corrected with deletion of that reference. 7) Article 24 - language was included relating to the possible sale of the boardwalk and what would happen. Because that was not an issue, the entire article has been deleted. Mrs. Hotton stated in reference to Article 8 and the placement of banners in public right'of-way, it was her understanding that the Parks Director could not approve such action and would require Engineering Department approval. Ms. Johnston stressed that was meant to tie it to the Boardwalk site and language could be changed to make that more. specific. Mrs. Horton referenced Article 6 and the point about cleaning up the facility after the day's use, she passed on the comment that a better job of cleaning up needs to be done through out the day during the operation of the market. Mr. Collins referenced Article 6 and questioned who will provide some type of disposal facilities for the garbage? Ms. Johnston explained the Farmers Market Association is to provide for the refuse disposal from operation of the market at the end of the day. Mr. Collins questioned if that was clearly stated in the agreement? MS. Johnston pointed out the specific language addressing that in Article 2(d) of the agreement. Terrie O,Neill, Municipal Services Coordinator, explained the contract states that it is the Farms Market responsibility to dispose of refuse and that point was discussed at their General Meeting. The vendors have proposed that each individual vendor provide a receptacle and will haul away their own garage. Roy McInnis, 2711 Maple Street, stated if a problem with disposal of garbage developed, it should be mandated and specified within the contract how such a situation is to be corrected. From the explanation given, he understands it is up to the individual vendor to remove garbage generated and collected at their booth; and it is up to them where they dispose of that garbage. Robert Ackerman, 3706 Arsenal Way, stressed the importance of having clean restrooms and sidewalks and felt wording should be included in the contract that addresses those issues. TAPE #1099 City Council Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 10 of 23 Vicki Vanneman, Director of Parks and Recreation Department, stated the restrooms at the boardwalk will be open each Sunday when the market is operating as it will be every weekend day of the summer. They did not experience any problems last year with excessive use of restroom facilities and her staff is responsible for clean up and refilling supplies. TAPE #1100 Mrs. Hotton stated Mr. McInnis did have a good point and although she would prefer that Farms Market maintain the space during the day on their own, she suggested adding an amendment to Article 25 so if a problem developed, the City could make a modification to the agreement and then hold them accountable. Mr. Dawkins stated he objected to that suggestion. If garbage/litter problems develop in the future, then Council could take necessary corrective action. Because past history of the market has been good, he did not want to "hammer down" the people participating in the Market. Mrs. Hotton stressed the point was not whether or not they cleaned up after the market closes... the question is maintaining the boardwalk area in a cleanly manner throughout the day; and there have been complains in the past. Ms. Johnston stated she felt it would be more understandable to incorporate language addressing the issue of clean up during operating hours in Article 6. She suggested the wording "throuGhout the day of operation as well as after the day". #0078 M/S/C/U(Horton/Neville) to approve the Farmers Market Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute this agreement with the Farmers Market Association with the amendment to Article 6 (first sentence) to read: "The Market agrees to be responsible for the cleaning of the market facility and the surrounding area on the boardwalk throughout the day and after each day of use". And, including the recommended change in Article 8 relating to banners placed on right-of-way; and the deletion of any reference to product liability coverage for "alcohol beverages" in Article 10. 7B -BUDGET ADJUSTMENT - PERSONNEL DIRECTOR AND CIVIL SERVICE OFFICER POSITIONS, #AB93-068 The attached Budget Adjustment authorizes the positions of Director Of Personnel and Civil Service Officer at full time for the period 4-1-93 through 5-31-93 and provides expenditure authority as discussed at the 4/5/93 Study Session. Rich Hanna, City Treasurer, stated this issue was addressed at some lengths at the budget deliberations last fall and thoroughly covered in a Study Session. As indicated on the TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 11 of 23 attached adjustment, this requires an additional $8,220.00 of expenditure authority and will maintain these positions at the current staffing level through the end of May. Mrs. Hotton questioned if the Fiscal and Budget Committee had determined if the source of funding was appropriate? Mr. johnson reported the Fiscal and Budget Committee voted to recommend approval of the Budget Adjustment as presented. Mr. Collins questioned for clarification had Fiscal and budget Committee determined the extended time period to be to June 30 rather than May 317 Mr. Johnson stated he recalled Council's direction during a Study Session on this issue was to fund the two positions until June. At the Fiscal and Budget Committee meeting members were given a copy of the Budget Adjustment that recommended extending funding for the remainder of the year. Upon checking the Agenda Packet, documentation had been set up that reflected prior Council concurrence - ending the full time funded period up through the month of May. The committee's main issue was to see where the funding was coming from and that there was sufficient funds coming into Beginning Cash. Public comment - none. #0201 M/S/C/U(Colvin/Dawkins) to approve Budget Adjustment 93-5: Source of funds - Increasing Beginning Cash $8,220.00; and Use of funds - Personnel Department $4,660.00, Civil Service Department $3,560.00. 8A - RESOLUTION #2429, SUPPORTING CONSISTENT AND UNDERSTANDABLE REGULATORY PROCESSES BETWEEN GOVERNMENTAL BODIES, #AB93-070 The Resolution promotes consistent and understandable requlatory processes between governmental bodies. The resolution is the result of recommendations from the citizen participants in the recent diversification summit. It was passed unanimously by the Kitsap Regional Planning Council on April 7, 1993. The City Clerk read the Resolution into the record. Mrs. Horton stated she is the originator of this document and was petitioned by the Transition Committee, the Committee moving forth some of the issues on the Diversification Summit, to forwarded this Resolution on to the Regional Planning Council and all governmental jurisdictions. The Kitsap County Commissioners passed an identical Resolution on April 12. She emphasized this resolution is a reiteration of the County-wide TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 12 of 23 Planning Policies and does talk about standardization of processes. Also, it includes a section that addresses diversification of the economy in Kitsap County. Public comment - none. Mr. Johnson stated he believes this is an excellent first step toward helping developers who come into Kitsap County. He pointed out in the past there has been, on occasion, adverse impacts on properties and people bordering development areas, i.e., previous construction on Auto Center Way and Sun Fjord area. He would like to see better dialogue between departments during the permitting process to .address situations like routing heavytruck traffic, etc., that impact surrounding residents. Mrs. Hotton stated during the April 13 meeting with the County Commissioners that was one of the things they strived to resolve. The County and City both agreed that a better job needed to be done in the area of joint governmental coordination and planning. Mr. Johnson expressed concern that a large portion of his District borders on the County and should there be major development on the westside of Kitsap Lake he wants to make sure there are adequate controls so that the surrounding properties will not be adversely affected. He encourages open communications and welcomes that kind of cooperation between the City and County. #0385 President Fitz stated during the meeting with the County Commissioners there was agreement on both sides that there are certain things that lend themselves to inter-governmental cooperation. Mr. Waibel stated he is currently remodeling homes in Bellevue, Lynnwood and North Seattle, attempting to make them power wheelchair accessible and there is no consistency among those three jurisdictions. The only consistency on those projects is Federal mandates. M/S/C/U(Waibel/Horton) to approve Resolution #2429, supporting consistent regulatory processes between governmental bodies 9A - PUBLIC HEARINGAND ORDiNANCE (FIRST READING) TO ANNEX 20 ACRE AREA OWNED BY THE PORT OF BREMERTON INTO THE JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF BREMERTON (75% PETITION & PRE-ANNEX ZONING, #3~LB93-071 A legally sufficient petition for the Port of Bremerton Annexation area has been filed with the City of Bremerton. According to RCW 35.13.140 the City must now hold a hearing before the City Council for discussion on this matter. Any interested persons may appear and voice approval or TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 13 of 23 disapproval for this annexation. Following the hearing, the Legislative body must: 1) enact an ordinance annexing the area; or 2) decline to annex the property; 3) approve, reject or modify the pre-annexation zoning of said property. The Council may annex all or any portion of the area proposed for annexation, but may not include any property not described in the annexation petition. President Fits asked the "Appearance Of Fairness/Conflict Of Interest" question with all Council members being seated. Terrie O,Neill, Municipal Services Coordinator, stated this is the final step before Council on a 75% method of annexation for a 20 acre parcel known as the Jefferson site and owned by the Port Of Bremerton. Mr. Waibel reported after reading the Growth Management Association Board's analysis of proper methods of annexation, he believes the City was very much vindicated. Public comment - none. #0489 M/S/C/U(Waibel/Colvin) to approve ordinance, on first reading, annexing approximately 20 acres known as the Port Of Bremerton Annexation Area which lies south of the City of Bremerton Biosolids Application site and north west of the Bremerton Airport and fixing the effective date of annexation. 9B - PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 10 LOT SUBDIVISION AND 10 SINGLE FAMILY HOME8 CALLED "ARVON VILLAGE"~ APPLICANT RA8 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (DAVID SMITH, PRESIDENT)~ LOCATION EAST SIDE OF ARVON AVENUE NORTH OF 16TH STREET, ='~AB93-072 On March 30, 1993, the Planning Commission approved this project as a Residential Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD); the Commission also recommended approval to City Council for the Preliminary Plat for 10 lots with 10 single- family residences. The City Council is the decision-making body responsible for evaluation of Preliminary and Final Plats. The City Council shall either: 1) affirm the decision under review; 2) Reverse the decision under review; 3) modify in whole or part the decision under review; 4) remand the matter back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 14 of 23 president Fits asked the "Appearance Of Fairness/Conflict Of Interest" question with all members being seated. Shane Jensen, Planner, explained at this time Council is considering a Preliminary Plat on a redesigned Arvon Village PUD. He provided a view graph that displayed the flexible nature of the PUD process in terms of lot development requirements. For example, taking a one acre site of 43,560 sq. ft., subtract 25% open space, approximately 10% for streets and other hard surfaces we are left with 65% of the lot area to make buildable lots. The Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum density of 12 dwelling units per acre in the SF-3 zone if 25% open space is provided. Therefore, if the lot area is divided into 12 units and the area is left for open spaces and streets we get a minimum lot size of 2300 sq. ft., which is what is being proposed at this time. The point of this explanation is that with open space provided some lot requirements have to be flexible... that being lot size, width and setbacks, etc. The Zoning Ordinance in the PUD Chapter states that the PUD shall allow exceptions to lot requirements of the underlying zoning district, including modification to lot size, setback, height and other similar requirements. The revision of the Arvon Village project include a 10 lot subdivision of lots that are 34 ft. wide, a private street (one-way), slightly over 25% open space (greenbelt, open play area and children's playground). The developer proposes to build 10 single family homes with four attached 0-lot line garages and two detached one-car garages on lots #1 and #6. All of the statistics of the site are shown on the table listed in the staff report. Parking for these lots is provided in one-car garage and tandem parking in driveways, which gives ample space for two and perhaps even a third vehicle. The main considerations at this time are the Preliminary Plat itself and does it meet the following criteria: 1) Consistent with the Bremerton Comprehensive Plan, 2) Consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, 3) Are all necessary utilities and public services available at the site for this type of subdivision. The first thing to consider is density of the Plat. The SF-3 zone with 25% open space allows 12 units per acre. Figured density on this project is 11.35 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan for this area calls for a higher density of residential 15-30 dwelling units per acre. There is substantial conformance with the Zoning Ordinance TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 15 of 23 allowable by the PUD process. The developer has gone through design phases to create lots to fit houses, to provide parking, open space and play areas for children, and use of some of the natural site amenities, such as some existing fruit trees. The Planning Commission's recommendation is for approval of the PUD in accordance with the following conditions: 1) The applicant/developer shall dedicate five (5) feet of property from the subject lots adjacent to Arvon Avenue to increase the right-of-way width to 20 feet. 2) The applicant/developer shall document adequate maintenance of common areas and streets, identifying the responsible parties. 3) Both sides of Village Lane will be restricted from on- street parking. 4) The applicant/developer shall design and install road improvements to meet approval of City Engineer and Fire Department. 5) A fire hydrant will be required at the northwest corner of Arvon Avenue and Village Lane. The hydrant shall meet the requirements of the Bremerton Water and Fire Departments. 6) The applicant/developer shall provide a Temporary Erosion Control Plan to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The Plan shall be implemented prior to any grading or construction. 7) Water and sewer service is available upon obtaining necessaryeasements and extending the utilities to the subject property as per City of Bremerton, AWAA & APWA standards. 8) All subdivision plats shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor. 9) Lots #1 and #6 shall resolve Gront Perimeter Setback issues by special permit (Zoning Ordinance Special Exception Of Right-Of-Way Vacation) prior to development. 10) Request curbing along both sides of Village Lane, Greenbelt area and Open Play area. Mr. Johnson questioned if Village Lane would run through the "basketball court" shown? Mr. Jensen the basketball court TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 16 of 23 will actually be painted lines on the street. Mr. Colvin questioned how wide is the street that leads into the development? Mr. Jensen explained Arvon Avenue is currently undeveloped and is 15 feet wide. He noted the developer will be dedicating five feet, which will then make Arvon Avenue 20 feet wide. Village Lane is 12 feet wide on both sides of the open play area. Mr. Colvin questioned if the development would include sidewalks? Mr. Jensen stated sidewalks are not proposed because of the 12 foot setback. Mr. colvin questioned if Village Lane would be a private street? Mr. Jensen stated yes and it is proposed that the property owners will be responsible to maintain Village Lane as well as the open space and play areas. Mr. Colvin questioned if this proposal is approved, would such a development be allowed in other parts of the City? Mr. Jensen stated this type of development is allowed in other parts of the City according to the PUD regulations for each particular zone. Mr. Colvin set up the scenario that he has a lot that is large enough to divide into two lots the same size as the proposed project and questioned if he could put a similar type project on his site? Don Pratt, Director Of Community Development, stated the method that is being used for this project is a PUD method that allows lots to be created in different sizes than otherwise mandated by the Zoning Code. You can even develop, through the PUD method, a lot that is only included in the footprint of the house and there is no other land associated with it. The intent is to have the overall density equal what is required in the Zoning Code. For Example, Mr. Jensen displayed a graphic of how many square feet in the total development there are per unit...that is the key element they use to measure density. They could all be joined all together without any yards other than the footprint, but have common open space all around them, and the net density would be allowable by the zone. This can be done in any zone in the City as long as the overall density is present. The test is: is this a creative use of the land and does it fit the neighborhood and the land that is being built upon? The Planning Commission made a decision that this does fit the neighborhood and land that is to be built upon. Council's decision, at this time, has to do with the plat only. The Planning Commission found this project was a creative use of this particular site so that these size parcel are appropriate there. This design in another location in the City and different environment may not be appropriate. Mr. Colvin stated he was concerned whether or not the neighbors of the site have deemed it appropriate for their area. Mr. Neville questioned the ending of Arvon Avenue and if the TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 17 of 23 City maintained the right-way on through to another street? Mr. Jensen explained Arvon Avenue ends at the pavement at the southern portion. No street development beyond that point is proposed. He pointed out there is an edge of a hill with a circular street below it...there is no follow through to the lower street. Mr. Neville expressed concern that particular area may end up as a parking lot for abandoned vehicles, etc. Mrs. Hotton stated since the property owners should be forming a homeowners association, she expected that would be something they would look at. Mr. Dawkins questioned if the City oversees what a ,,homeowner's association" will have in their agreement? Mr. Jensen stated the conditions of a homeowner's association are included as conditions of the plat. President Fits questioned could the homeowners' association make stricter covenants than what is already included? Mr. Jensen stated yes, provided they are not in violation of any civil rights. Mr. Johnson stated he recalled when Dockside was approved, the association rules and by-laws were part of what was adopted at Council level and questioned will that happen in this instance? Mr. Pratt stated that would happen with the final plat and their intent is to have the City Engineer review the final plat to make sure that the road maintenance is adequately covered. Planning staff had several other concerns other than maintenance of the roadway for the final plat, therefore, they have not asked that it be provided as part of the preliminary plat. Mr. Neville reported he received a letter from Mr. Robert E. Wood in which he indicates there are errors in the square footage calculations. Mr. Jensen stated he reviewed Mr. Wood's letter with the developer, who stated to Mr. Jensen that all of the calculations he gave for the plat were taken from a Subdivision Map, signed by a professional surveyor, for a short plat that was done earlier in the project. The main discrepancy was based on a 195 foot length taken from the Assessor's records. Mr. Smith stated to Mr. Jensen that the Assessor's records say 195+ feet, which means "subject to a survey at least 195 feet long". He recalculated the land in the plat according to the survey map - 200 X 202 square feet and it is not exactly square so if you take out the northeast corner (15 X 66) dedication of 5 feet times 132 feet long along Arvon Avenue and subtract a small 2 ft. by 50 ft. no- mans-land piece of property on the southeast corner, the total area deductions is 1750 square foot, which would leave 38,650 TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 18 of 23 sq. ft. President Fitz questioned if the survey took precedents over the Assessor's map?Mr. Jensen stated yes, and a final survey for this plat will be done prior to final plat approval and any discrepancies can be taken care of at that time. Mr. Waibel stated one of the opportunities we were providing when looking at this site previously was the opportunity for first time home buyers to get into the single family home market. He questioned if the changes made substantially increased the cost of the homes to the point where that market would be excluded? David Smith, President RAS Property Management, 423 Pacific Avenue, stated his presentation would cover the homes and the value they would be adding to the neighborhood, home ownership, lot sizes and several miscellaneous items. He did have a slide presentation available showing "narrow houses" that have been built in other parts of the United States. In answer to Mr. Waibel'squestion about price of the proposed homes, he was able to hold the line on price even thoughthere were some changes to the project. He noted cost of materials have increased as well, however, the price of the homes is still at the mid $70,000s, which is somewhat above the medium price that homes in Bremerton sell for today. There are people who have already indicated their desire to purchase one of his homes and compared to other homes that have sold in that neighborhood ($60,000 range) this development will be raising the value of the neighborhood. Since 1980 home ownership has declined in the City (60% in 1980). He was not please to report that currently there is 50% home ownership in the city of Bremerton. Mr. Smith pointed out the project is designed with lot sizes of 34 feet wide and 68 feet deep. Included in the design is a mini-park for the homeowners use. There was considerable discussion in the Planning Commission hearing about the open space/basketball court area. He emphasized that area is wide enough to establish a separate lane to serve the residents. The "open space" requirement is met by just the "green" area as shown on the drawing. The hard surfaced area has been widened to make room for the basketball court, which he feels adds a nice touch. In reference to development of the Homeowners Association Agreement, he has engaged a local attorney to develop the basic format. He tends to lean toward architect controls rather than social controls for such an agreement. TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 19 of 23 Mr. Smith described the homes - they are to be a victorian style with front porches, with garages recessed to the rear. The street scene should be attractive and similar to what is already seen in Bremerton. The homes will be supplied with natural gas and will meet Cascade Natural Gas Company's "Best House" criteria for an energy efficient home. In response to the question about the undeveloped portion of Arvon Avenue, he noted that area would be a piece of landlocked property, which has been improved below on Anderson with the duplexes. Mr. Smith has gained easement through Mr. Burton's backyard to handle stormwater drainage. Currently, Mr. Burton is being impacted by flooding off of the subject site and there has been a trade off with him to fix some of his problems in exchange for the easement. Dan Eisses, Acting Assistant City Engineer, indicated to Mr. Smith that he hoped the undeveloped area of Arvon Avenue would stay as a grassy configuration to act as a bio-swail for the site. Mr. Charles Wyde11, Executive Director, Community Resources Assessment Center (CRAC), extended Pastor Robertson's regrets for not being able to attend this meeting. He emphasized the Mission Statement of CRAC is to assist in the development of a healthy community through the empowerment of individuals by promoting affordable home ownership, education and entrepreneurship as a means of providing or improving quality of life by restoring and nurturing individuals' dignity and self- respect. In answer to the question "what does the design mean to CRAC's in terms of their Mission Statement", the design says that we are able to promote that sense of community because of the common areas that will be shared, the close proximity of homes as well as some of features that are already there. in addition to that, they look at the benefit of single family dwellings verses the multi-family dwellings, which are a lot more transient than single family dwellings. The next question is who are the type of people looking for this type of development? He shared several profiles of individuals., i.e. professional single mother with one child, who is working two jobs and who has the ability to afford a home in this price range; single mother, who was a child in a migrant family, who is determined about her children having a stable life; recently divorced military wife, with three children, who now must establish her own career and who could afford this priced home. Another important aspect is that they will be promoting retention of the homes for a minimum of 5-years, which allows those family to grow and stabilize prior to their looking for a larger home. Those incentives are in some of the financial packages as well as part of some of the TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 20 of 23 things they are talking about, including some of the covenants to developing and improving the properties. CRAC will be providing those individuals training on issues of home maintenance, pre and post budget planning, and developing communication skills. He stressed this type of project is the ideal community to carry out the intent of their Mission Statement. He pointed out the street being named "Village Lane" also promotes a sense of community. Betty Bue11, High Avenue, requested clarification of location of streets into the proposed project, width of greenbelt and location of the fruit trees. Mr. Jensen pointed out specific locations on the view graph map. Bob Wood stated his interest in writing the letter previously responded to by Mr. Jensen was to provide Council with information needed in order for Council to make a decision. He questioned the actual liveable square footage in the proposed homes? He noted the 19 X 27 is the advertised sizes of the outside and in usual terms that is a footprint of a dwelling on a lot. According to Mr. Jensen, he was surprised to find the footprint, in Bremerton, is the roof perimeter not the dwelling perimeter. He urged Council to keep a close watch on what is actually being developed. Owen TripD, 3030 Pine Road NE, stated he was opposed to this proposal, however, he does support private home ownership. He did not find the 34 ft. wide lot acceptable. He noted Olympic Manor's minimum lot width is 50 feet, which is rather tight. He did not support cutting back the lot size any smaller than 50 feet. He participated on the Committee that updated the City's Comprehensive Plan in the late 80's. The overall theme for the Committee's efforts, at that time, was to make Bremerton a nice place to live. Then, that Committee went to the Comprehensive Map and outlined what the densities should be in certain areas. He pointed out when the termdensity cog units per the acre is used, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is correct, it is a figure and in some cases it maybe ok. He is not pleased with the allowable density within his own area on Pine Road where it went from 9 units per acre to 20-30 units per acre. He viewed the proposed project as being a jammed in configuration that needs dressing up. Roy McInnis, 2711 Maple Street, stated in viewing the proposed project it was not something that was attractive to him at this point in his life. However, he sees such a project as being affordable to someone like his children, who are looking for such a buy. He emphasized there is a need for houses, such as this project, in the City of Bremerton. TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 21 of 23 Betty Bus11 stressed the importance of include "sidewalks" as part of the project considering the fact that these types of homes will attract people with children. Mrs. Horton stated this site is located within her Council District and at the previous hearing on this site she was critical of the arrangement. She likes the fact that the developer was willing to take some of the suggestions given at the previous hearings and reconfigure an area that creates an atmosphere of "neighborhood". Even though the lots and homes are small, she feels they are in keeping with the area, which is "duplex". She sees this project bringing together a lot of good elements that we could look to as a model for other development in the City. Granted, it would be nice to have larger lots, but the combination of the CRAC and the element they bring with home ownership with teaching first time home owners the responsibility of owning a home is wonderful. One of the goals Bremerton needs and is included in Housing Bremerton Plan is home ownership. It is recognized that there are an over preponderance of rental properties and in order for us to upgrade our community, we need to reverse that trend..going from 60% rentals to probably 70% home ownership. She also believes having covenants on this site will give hope that in the future it will be a self-perpetuating neighborhood and that home owners will not just come in and then abandon the property, allowing it to deteriorate. She referenced a comment made by one of the neighbors of the project, who was at first opposed to the project, but was impressed with the changes made by the developer and is now in favor of the project. She sees the proposed project fitting in more with Vision Kitsap. She was pleased with the attention given to open space, maintaining natural vegetation, providing landscaped areas where possible, and recessing the parking, so that the living area, people area, is the focal point rather than the living space for a vehicle. She stressed the positive aspects of having a basketball court available for youth activities. She believes this project is a. creative usage of the site and that it would be unrealistic to get the dollar value out of four homes on four lots in that location because it would not be similar to surrounding properties. That is an important point when looking at trying to site such a project. This project may be a model project for the rest of that area to redevelop into. President Fits stated she likes smaller lot sizes because there is less "yard work". Mr. Dawkins pointed out the entire City of Bremerton was laid out on 30 x 100 ft lots. He reported several houses are being TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 22 of 23 built on Adele that are on 30 ft. lots with parking coming in to the site off of the alley, and are on the market for a little below $100,000. Mr. Waibel noted this proposed project does not violate the City's Zoning Ordinance, which in fact provides for this type of trade off. Mr. Johnson stated he hoped no one thinks this is what we want Bremerton to look like. Personally, he believes we are 20 years away from a slum with this project. If one looks at houses of this size packed on narrow lots, it is tight living conditions. In his opinion, the place for this size lot is for infill and replacement homes. Mr. Colvin stated he personally experienced living in "shotgun" type houses and he admires the promotion for first time home buyers, but it is not the type of house he would want to live in the rest of his life. When people are brought close together, as these are, they get on each other nerves and a lot of things happen. He pointed out there will be no sidewalks provided by the developer, so the children will have to walk on the streets. He questioned what would it cost the developer to provide sidewalks as part of the project? Pratt stated the cost to build sidewalks is $1.00 per square foot. Frankly, he believes sidewalks are required in most places in the City. This is not a public street and is something they refer to as an integrated sidewalk and street (a lane). He learned about integrated sidewalks and streets when they were involved with Vision Kitsap. He emphasized a 12 foot width is adequate room for a vehicle moving at 10 miles per hour and someone to walk along side. Arvon Avenue functions similarly until it intersects with 15th Street where there is a sidewalk. This project is a tucked away element off of the circulation pattern and the people using the integrated street will be the residents of that neighborhood. He is of the opinion that this design looks like the old traditional "village square" where walkers and cars can be accommodated for 10 houses only. What that does is to allow the homes to be sold at a lower cost than if full sidewalks were required. He believes there is a balance and the biggest mistake they could make would be to require 20 ft. wide streets with sidewalks on either side. He emphasized the City Engineer feels comfortable with an integrated vehicle/pedestrian access around that square, which amounts to a driveway. Mr. Colvin questioned for clarification if that would not be a public street? Mr. Pratt stated the only reason people drive on Arvon, at this point, is to enter one #2700 TAPE #1100 City Council Reg. Mtg. Minutes April 14, 1993 Page 23 of 23 of the 10 houses. It is not a through street to access other areas. For that purpose, it functions more as a driveway than as a street. Mr. Colvin questioned who would be responsible for maintaining Arvon Avenue? Mr. Pratt stated it would be the City's responsibility. M/S/C(Waibel/Horton) to approve the Preliminary Plat for Arvon Village as the application meets the criteria necessary as stated in the Zoning Ordinance, subject to the above listed conditions (1-10). Vote on motion: In Favor: Neville, Horton, Waibel, Dawkins, Fitz Opposed: Johnson, Collins Abstained: Colvin With no further business meeting adjourned at 8:47 P.M. KATHLEEN L. City Clerk City of Bremerton KLM/EF/me cc: Normal Distribution File/Vault "EXHIBIT A" CITIZEN'S AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT Of CITIZEN'S AD HOC COMMITTEE To REVIEW CITY CHARTER and FORM OF GOVERNMENT On September 9, 1992, the Bremerton City Council passed Resolution 2401, creating this Committee, calling for a re- port of the Committee Findings and Recommendations no later than April 1, 1993, at which time the Committee is to be discontinued. Charged with evaluating City Government and the Charter in specified areas, the Committee has had 24 meetings. The first two meetings involved an orientation by Council Pres. Lynn Horton and discussions by members about the mission of the Committee, procedures and areas to be addressed. Committee interviews have been held with Mayor Mentor, Council Pres. Hotton, all members of the Council, the City Attorney, the City Clerk and selected department heads. The Committee would like to express appreciation for the cooper- ation received from each of the elected officials and mem- bers of the City staff. Valuable assistance has also been received through interviews with representatives from the Municipal Research and Services Center, Ms. Dorene Marchions, former Mayor and Mr. Pat Vache, former Councilman from the City of Redmond, Richard Cushing, City Manager, Olympia, Washington and Ms.joni Earl, Dep. County Exec. of Snohomish County and former City Manager of Mill Creek, Washington- The Committee has also had telephonic contact with repre- sentatives of the cities of Mukilteo, Kennewick, Kent, Lynwood, Kirkland, Seattle and Vancouver. Recommendations of the Committee are as follows: CITIZEN'S AD HOC COMMITTEE ALTERNAT I VE RECOMMENDAT IONS April 14, 1995 ~.t ty Counci~ have clear y es- tabiished the gravity and comOt c o on tained in the Ad Hoc Committee e. t e not labor under the illusion of total accomplishment im- mediate!y, 'though that may be very desirable. However, we do believe an incremental approach is practical and the follow- ing steps could be properly considered and disposed of ini- tially, as Phase I. Step 1. - Reclassification to Charter Code City - The Committee originally recommended reclassification to Non-Charter Code status. However, the City Council Study Sessions and further research revealed potential advantages to retention of a Charter; 1. With a Charter, important ordinances can be further protected through adoption in the Charter. 2. Charter provides vehicle through which special "tailoring" of 55A can be done, such as; I. Mayoral and District elections, ii. Removal from office clauses, IIi. Non-Uniformed Civil Service, IV. Pre-filing residency requirements, V. Registered Voters vs Qualified Electors. In addition, further advantages arise from adoption of Code City status; 1. Eliminates any question about revising our Charter by adopting portions of 35A, 2. Greater flexibility in change of govt. form, 3. Greater flexibility in annexations, 4. Charter can prevail over Code if appropriate steps taken by Council. It was suggested that selected portions of 35A be in- corporated into the present Charter to avoid Reclassi- fication as a Code City. Though this might provide a plausible approach to the needed Charter corrections, it raises some legal questions, it is cumbersome and of doubtful value. The concerns about 35A RCW being inhib- itlye to a Class ! Charter city are, according to all the research of the Committee, completely unfounded. We have been unable to find any Code City that can recall experiencing a disadvantage. Based upon the foregoing, as an alternative approach to the recommendations made in the Committee Report, the Committee now strongly urges serious consideration of reclassification from a Class ! City, to a Charter Code City. Obviously, a wide variety of preparatory steps must be taken precedent to the reclassification action, all of which must rest unon guidance by Legal Counsel. Step 2 - Term Limits By ordinance or charter provision prohibit any elected official from serving for more than two (2) consecutive terms. Such limit to be effective for service commenc- ing 1992. Step 3 - Campaign Contribution Limits By ordinance or charter provision prohibit election campaign contributions in excess of $350 from any individual, group, or corporate contributor. Step 4 - Performance Audits By ordinance or charter provision require an indepen- dent audit of books, functions and performance records of all city departments. Such audit to be conducted in part on an annual basis, so that in each 5-year period, every department will have been reviewed- Reports to be filed with the City Council and open to the public. Step 5 - City Filing of PDC Forms By ordinance or charter provision require all candi- dates for public office to file copies, with the City Clerk, of any and all forms required by the Public Disclosure Commission, established by 42.17 RCW. Step 6 - Complete Charter Revision Re-state or modify existing Charter provisions and in- corporate appropriate provisions from Optional Munici- pal Code, only as recommended by City Attorney. The F'hase ! steos above were not listed on any basis of seOuentia! imoortance or priority. The manner and tim- ing of their handling would have to rest uoon the City Council decision regarding reclassification to Charter Code City or Non-Charter Code City. Phase II Step 7 - City Reorganization to Council/Manager Successful completion of the Phase t items would lead to the subject of City Reorganization. From a practical standpoint and, out of consideration for those in elected office, Reorganization should be pursued with a timing and method that will incur the least election cost to the city. This refers to whether the Council takes action by passing a Resolution or by Referring to the Voters. It also refers to establishing a future effective date for the Reorganization that will minimize the inconvenience to presently-elected officials. Appropriate Charter or Ordinance modifications should be established prior to any reorganization action, pur- suant to the Committee Majority recommendations that: !. There be a Full Time Mayor ( Minority Opinion Attached ); and 2. There be a Council of Six Members, elected at large ( Minority Opinion Attached ). Upon completion of Phase i and F'hase II preparatory steps, the Committee recommends that the City Council pass a resolution, pursuant to 35A.07.060 RCW, submitting to the voters the Reclassification to Charter Code City, retaining Council/Mayor government and adopting Revised Charter. The City Council should also announce the intention to pass a similar resolution early in the second quarter of 1995, to Reorganize city government to the Council/Manager form, calling for 1995 Primary and General elections of all Elected City Officials, with Reorganization effective when the new officers are seated in January, 1996. MINORITY REPORT OPPOSING FULL-TIME MAYOR Currently, the Mayor's position is full-time, with the complete administrative responsibilities of the City taking up approximately 75% of his time. If the Committee proposal to change Government Form to Council/Manager is enacted, it would relieve the Mayor's office of all administrative duties, while retaining full time status and pay. The Minority feels that this is irresponsible and re- sults in a super Council member with a distinct advantage over other members, who would be part time. A full time Mayor could become most influential on the City Manager, creating a situation of dissension and dis- trust. This would be quite harmful to City Government. With a City Manager, it is totally unnecessary to re- tain a full time Mayor with no administrative duties. It would also place an unnecessary burden on the taxpayers of the city, since they would have to pay full salary for an inactive Mayor. CiTIZEN'S AD HOC COMMITTEE MINORITY REPORT Goal: Election of a hiqh!y representative City Council which reflects the demoOraphics of City and provides a representa- tive voice for all, with minimum special interest influence. The minority has agreed with the majority on all items of the majority report with the exception of the recommenda- tion of At Large elections. The minority feels that it is essential to maintain district representation similar to that enjoyed in our present city government. We propose to do that by having (1) six part-time councilmen elected from districts and (2) one full-time councilman elected at large. The full-time councilman would serve as Mayor and president of the Council. The minority would propose the following: Subject to completion of Reorganization action, the Council pass an ordinance establishing that council po- sitions one through six be elected from districts and serve part-time. Council position seven be elected at large and serve full-time as Mayor and president of the council. The Majority/Minority Ratio - 2/1 Reasons for Minority Report. 1. The cost of running in a city-wide election would prohibit many qualified candidates from running. 2. District elections reduce the real or perceived po- litical influence on councilmen that result from cam- paign contributions needed in a general election. 3. District elections enhance the opportunity for work- ing class, lower income, and minority candidates to participate. 4. Poorer neighborhoods are more likely to have a rep- resentative in city government if elections are from districts. 5. Candidates elected at large are less likely to ac- tively seek to resolve problems specific to a given neighborhood. 6. if candidates are elected at large, a special inter- est group could vote as a block for every council posi- tion. A block of fifty votes could determine the out- come for~ many candidates. 7. With district elections, it is easier for citizens to change their representative if he is not responsive to their needs. 8. District elections ensures the council has city-wide knowledge. This is helpful in land use and comprehen- sive planning issues. it is also particularly helpful in long range planning for parks, transportation and utilities. 9. District elections prevent either an all east side o~~ all west side council. 10. District elections cut down on campaign trash, such as signs, discarded leaflets and flyers. There are only 2 city-wide candidates rather than 14 ~-esulting from at large elections. 11. Being able to contact one's own councilman about a local problem, with some hope of having it resolved, has been the most popular aspect of the existing city government.